City Council Packet - 02/09/1976 ;�
:�
, .
,.
�'
t
::, ::
a,.
•,
�..
�.
.,�-'
r-.
i
,, .g. � .....��
7,
�. .
i
a.. /
�.9
� p
-,�
J�
C..
0
�.A
a
3
D.
JY
�tl
.. e.� �
TICARD CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
{� FEBRUARY 9, 1976, 7:30 P.M.
FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
LECTURE ROOM
AGENDA:
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. CALL TO AUDIENCE FOR THOSE DESIRING TO SPEAK ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
5. CONSENT AGENDA: (All matters Ander this heading are considered to be routine
by tle City Council and will be enacted in one motion in the
form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of
theso items. If discussion is desired by any Coyncil member
or member of the audience, that item will be removed from the
Consent Agenda and will be considered separately,)
(a) Approval of Minutes - Regular moeti}:g January 26, 1976; special
meeting January 29, 1976.
(b) Receive and file WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
(1) Communication from Chairman of C.R.A.G.
(2) Communication from C.R.A.G. Transportation Planner
(3) Communication from Senator Mark Hatfield
(c) APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES AND INVESTMENTS: 88 241.03
6. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION FEE - Appearance by
Roy McIntyre.
7. AUTHORIZE REFUND - $125.00
Conditional Use Application - James Brien, 12115 SW Lincoln Street
(a) Recommendation of Planning Director
8. APPROVE O.L.C.C. APPLICATIONS
(a) Sherwood Inn, 15700 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road - DA Application
Gaffer's 207 Tigard Plaza, 11420 SW Pacific Hwy. - RMB Application
Big B Thriftway, 14365 SW Pacific Hwy, - PS Application
Lone Oak Restaurant, 11920 SW Pacific Hwy. - DA Application
Town Tavern - 12370 SW Main Street T RMB Application
Ron`s Green Valley Tavern, 12470 SW Main Street - RMB Application
Girod's Super Market, 12230 SW Maip Street - PS Application
American Legion Tigard Post, 11578 SW Pacific Hwy. - DBA Application
(b) Recommendation of Chief of Police
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS (commencing at 8:00 P.M.)
(a) CRAG DRAFT PLAN HEARING
(1) Public Hearing Opened
(2) Opening Remarks - Rod Sandoz C.R,A.G. Planner
(3) Public, Comment & Input
(4) Hearing Closed
(b) Hearing to discuss Tigard's community needs as a basis for applying
for monies under the Department of Housing and Urban Development Block
Grant Program.
(1) Public Hearing Opened
(2) Opening Remarks - Planning Staff
(3) Public Comment & Input .
(4) Hearing Closed
(5) Discussion By Council
(c) ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
A request by City of Tigard to amend sections 18.20.020, 18.20.030,
and 18.20.040 of the Tigard Municipal Code to increase the minimum
lot sizes required in residential zones for duplex and two family use
from 8,000 square feet to 10,000 square feet.
(1) Public Hearing Opened
(2) Statement of Facts by Planning .Director
(3) Public Testimony
Proponents
Opponents
Cross Examination
(4) Recommendation of Planning Director
(5) Consideration by Council
(6) ORDINANCE No. 76- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL
CODE, CHAPTER 18.20, SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL ZONES, TO INCREASE THE MINIMUM
LOT SIZE REQUIRED FOR A DUPLEX IN THE R-7
ZONE FROM 8,000 TO 10,000 SQUARE FEET AND
TO DECREASE THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE FROM
35 PERCENT TO 25 PERCENT AND DELETE
DUPLEX RESIDENCES AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN
THE R-30 ZONE; PRESCRIBING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
10. RESOLUTION No. 76-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING
APPOINTMENTS TO FILL ONE UNEXPIRED ALTERNATE TERM
AND THREE EXPIRING TERMS ON THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
AND DESIGN REVIEW BOARD.
11. RESOLUTION No. 76-_- A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING AN
APPOINTMENT TO FILL AN UNEXPIRED TERM ON THE TIGARD
PLANNING COMMISSION.
12. RESOLUTION No. 76- A RESOLUTION APPOINTING FAYE SUNDT AS A DEPUTY CITY
RECORDER FOR MUNICIPAL COURT RELATED PURPOSES.
(a) Recommendation of City Administrator
PAGE 2 - COUNCIL AGENDA - FEBRUARY 9, 1976
a
13. RESOLUTION No. 76, RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTING THE
^^ PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED WITHIN SALEM FREEWAY
SUBDIVISION AND AUTHORIZING RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE
BOND THEREFORE.
(a) Recommendation of City Administrator.
14. RESOLUTION No, 76- RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL, ACCEPTING THE
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED WITHIN PATHFINDER
SUBDIVISION.
(a) Recommendation of City Administrator.
15. ORDINANCE No. 76-� AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 10.28,
OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL, CODE BY ADDING TO SECTION 10.28.
130 TO PROHIBIT PARKING ON A PORTION OF COMMERCIAL STREET
LYING EASTERLY OF MAIN STREET, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND
FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(a) Recommendation of City Administrator.
16. ORDINANCE No. 76-� AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 10.28,
OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL COPE BY ADDING TO SECTION
10.28.130 TO PROHIBIT PARKING{ ON SW' HUNZIKER STREET
LYING SOUTHEASTERLY OF HALL BOULEVARD, DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY AND FIXING 'AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(a) Recommendation of City Administrator.
17. ORDINANCE No. 76-� AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 10.28,
OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING TO SECTION
10.28.130 TO PROHIBIT PARKING ON A'PORTION OF SCOTT
COURT LYING WESTERLY OF SW 98TH AVENUE, DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
1
(a) RecommendAtion of City Administrator.
18. STATUS REPORT POLICE LIFE INSURANCE
(a) Report by City Administrator.
19. '?THER
(a) Budget Committee Discussion Session
20. ADJOURNMENT
PAGE 3 - COUNCIL AGENDA - FEBRUARY 9, 1976
t I' I G r� R. I? C I T `1
REGULAR ^.'BETTHNI i F'EBF:t7ARY
1. ROLL CALL: Present: iyor iV.I I bu_ •)ohn
E. Cook, Robert C. Mroor�, :`plan 1. _ _ .:!.son; R.B.
Adams, Chief of Police; tJl . D. Bai ey , i.ege.l Co nsel;
Richard C. Bolen, Piar,_ning _Jirectnr; Bruce P. Clark.,
City Administrator; Doris ha'rtig, Ci - Recorder.
2. CALL TO AUDIENCE FOR THOSE DESIRING TO SPEAK 0'\1 NOiT-AGENDA ITEMS
(a) No one desired to speak.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES, Regular meeting January 26, 1976; special
meeting January 29, 1976
(a) Motion to approve: Councilman Cook, Seconded by Council-
man Moore.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
Chairman of C.R.A.G.
C.R.A.G. , Transportation Planner
Senator Mark 0. Hatfield
(a) Motion to receive and file: Councilman Cook, seconded
by Councilman Moore.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
5. APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES AND INVESn',IENTS: $68,241.03
(a) Motion to approve: Councilman Cook, seconded by
Councilman Moore.
Approved by unanimous vote of
6. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF CONDITTONAI. f. ..'E, vI' 1C:.3`.!'a(,e'v FEE -
Appearance by Roy MC T n tyre.
(a) Mr. McIntyre stated his reas�-_^_s foi
of the conditional use applicat:on f.
Mr. Mote, owner of the "building- o T pr
roose E ,-is-�-i :.:.
i�,
site, questioned whether t1ne fee for apreviouS
conditional use application for a dif'f'erent lase
be applied to this request.
Council, staff and applicant d.iscuss�!_'L rFauest..
a
i
(b) Motion to deny request: Councilman Mickelson, seconded
by Councilman Cook.
Denied by unanimoxzs vote of Council present.
7. REQUEST FOR r?EFUND OF CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION FEE - James
Brien, 12115 S. W. Lincoln Street
(a) The City Administrator advised Council that the application
had received attention by the Staff and Planning Co=mmission
but that a definitive action had not been taken.
(b) Motion to deny request: Councilman Cook, seconded by
Councilman Mickelson,
Request denied by 3-1 majority vote. Mayor Bishop
voting nay.
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS - OPENED 8:05 P,M.
(a) CRAG Draft Plan
(1 ) Public hearing opened
(2) Opening remarks by Mayor Bishop stating that it
was an opportunity for the oitizens of Tigard to
have input and make suggestions to be summarized
and forwarded to CRAG for review and consideration.
Rod Sandoz, CRAG Planner, handed out information
titled CRAGS Goals & Ob eotives Draft 2 and dis-
played; a c ar s ow ng a proce ure proposed
for the development and implementation of a regional
growth management plan and; 2) a map showing planned
boundries.
Mr. Sandoz stated that CRAG's goal for the adoption
date of phase V of the three year plan was April
22, 1976 and pointed out that each of the Phases
(as adopted) allows six months for the cities to
come into compliance with -the plan and a provision
for an extension of time when necessary.
Planning Director Dick Bolen summarized anticipated
impact on Tigard.
(3) Public Comment & Input opened
The following people testified:
Mary Ann Kaczynski, 12985 S. W. 135th. , Tigard
i Larry St-Pierre, 13992 S. W. Fern, Tigard
PAGE 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 9, 1976
Lynn Engdahl, Executive Director, Western Environ-
mental Tracie Association, Inc.
Mrs. McIntyre, 8863 S. W. Commercial Street, Tigard
Rober-; Bailey
(4) Hearing Closed
COUNCIL RECESSED 9:05
COUNCIL RECONVENED 9:25
(b) Hearing to discuss Tigard's Community needs as a basis
for applying for monies under the Department of Housing
and Urban Development Block Giznt Program.
(1 ) Public Hearing Opened
(2) Opening Remarks
City Administrator reminded Countsl that approxi-
mately one year ago a aeriep of publio hearings
were held to establish Tigard's priorities in terms
of improvement activities. Number one priority
was providing the City with an adequate pedestrian/
bicycle pathway system. On the basis of that input,
the Staff submitted an application to the Dept. of
Housing and Urban Development for monies to construct
pathways which was not funded. The City Administrator
further pointed out that there are now monies avail-
able for a second year of projects a d ho recommended
that the City take the opportunity tq re-submit the
application. The proposed applicattgn would be
essentially the same with only a few revisions and
modifications.
(3) Public Comment and Input
Mrs. McIntyre, Council and Staff discussed funding
of application.
(4) Hearing Closed
(5) Discussion by Council
Council and staff discussed the proposed application.
Council requested Staff check the status of the
Durham Road Pathway with the Tualatin Development
Corp. in regards to the completion of that project
and to report findings to Council.
Motion to authorize Staff to re-submit application:
Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Moore.
PAGE 3 — COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 9, 1976
Appro-%rec ?;.- unanimous vote of Council present.
(C) ZONE ORDINAPTC;E AT�ENDMENT
A request by City of Tigard to amend sections 18.20.020,
18.20.030, and 18.20.040 of the Tigard Municipal Code to
increase the minimum lot sizes required in residential
zones for duplex and two family use from 8,000 square feet
to 10,000 square feet.
(1 ) Public hearing Opened
Statement of facts by Planning Director
(2) Public Testimony - None
Cross Examination - None
(3) Planning Director recommended changing the previous
required minimum lot sizes in residential zones for
duplex and two family use and the deletion of duplex
residences as a conditional use in the R-30 zone.
(4) Consideration by Council
(5) ORDINANCE NO. 76-5 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TIGARD
MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 18,20
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES,
TO INCREASE THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE
REQUIRED FOR A DUPLEX IN THE R-7
ZONE FROM 8,000 TO 10,000 SQUARE
FEET AND TO DECREASE THE MAXIMUM
LOT COVERAGE FROM 35 PERCENT TO
25 PERCENT AND DELETE DUPLEX
RESIDENCES AS A CONDITIONAL USE
IN THE R-30 ZONE; PRESCRIBING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE AND DECLARING AN
EMERGEHCY. .
Council discussed the title of the ordinance with
staff and felt it should be amended to reflect the
full intention of the ordinance.
Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 76-5: Councilman Conk,
seconded by Councilman Mickelson.
F
Motion to amend Ordinance No. 76-5 by inserting the
words R-15 ZONE after and, fourth line down:
Councilman Cook, seconece by Councilman Mickelson.
Approved amendment to Ordinance No. 76-5 by unanimous
vote of Council present.
PAGE 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 9, 1976
i
ili: the fj�{•�.�.�:?;'a..-.y ,'.a C'�li!f1'.-. 3i I 't
t t?<
�. .r �T»: -1P:i) 4rs�"c•`E:"(';.VE, iJAS'F:' 'n -
D.�.,r�.:,.,�T . =:�; rn+TEI�Gt,n:t„'. JISO, to am eYt�lof
ordir.arce, Sections 3r last three lines on page one
to read - 1 ) Duplex residential, with a Inl.nimum
to size oftenthousand square feet: one duplex
per lot; : Councilman Mickelson, seconded '�.✓
Councilman Cook.
Amendment approved by unanimous vote of Council
present.
Discussion called for on Ordiance 76-5 as amended
None
The motion to adopt Ordinance 76-5 as amended was
Passed by unanimous vote of Council present.
City Administrator recommended that Council consider an
amendment to Comprehensive Plan to reflect change.
9. O.L.C.C. Applications
Sherwood Inn, 15700 S.W. Upper Bones Ferry Road - DA Application
Big GafferThtsr,
14365
OwTigard
Plaza
Paci
RMB Application
Lone Oak Restaurant, 11920 SW Paciffic ic�H PS Application
Town Tavern, 12370 SW Main St. - RrgB Application
tDA Application
Ron's Green Valley Tavern, 12¢70 RM App St.
Girod's Super Market, 12230 SW Main St. - PS Applicationcation
American Legion Tigard Post, 11578 SW Pac.Hwy. - DPA Application
(a) Chief of Police requested the Sherwood Inn application be
set aside for the next meeting and stated the remaining
sever. appl.icatits had been invest! -ated and =vert. reconianend-
ed for approval of renewal by the Department.
Motion to for:,tard applications to t objections;
ho
withoutu
Councilman Moore, seconded by CatznOLCr OLCCan t o'
Discussion followed and Council requested 'the Town: Ta,eern
be deleted from the list of aPPlicants and directed Chief
Adams supply additional information on Town Tavern for
Counc-196 consideration and review.
Motion to rescind previous motion with the approval of
second and to forward applications to OLC
objections with the exceptions oC without
f Sherwood Inn and Town
Tavern: Councilman Moore, seconded by Councilman Cook.
PAGE 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 9, 1976
i
41
10.. RESOLUTION No. t 6w.`� 3:HE CGt-'!'_ ' I:
APIA!.': 1,0 F .T.:
.LTEt'tNA T E V-:PIJ AN'i ;,liR2 .
C111141 THE S'[Tr. '`i, i-' .a.N AND J]Ea:i.GN
REV.TEW BOARD.
Discussion - Councilman Cook requested the month and the
day of tern expiration be changed to March I on all four
appointments.
Motion to adopt: Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman
Moore.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
11 . RESOLUTION No. 76-8 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
MAKING AN APPOINTMENT TO FILL AN UNEXPIRED
TERM ON THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
Motion to adopt: Councilman Coop, seconded by Councilman
Moore.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
11A. RESOLUTION No. 76-9 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
MAKING APPOINTMENT TO FILL ONE EXPIRED
TERM ON THE: PARK BOARD.
Discussion - City Administrator informed Council that
there would still be two vacancies on the Park Board
upon approval of this resolution.
Motion to adopt: Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman
Moore.
°-^Trovsa `,,:i ananimous vote of Council present.
12. RESOLUTION No. 76-10- A RE3011J^7l'N AP OT'1':'1?.'-; _,'Ati, S:J;4T)"�' A:� 11
DEPUTY C:ITir nT,"tt:;,z?; =^R i�nJP�:i i',i ' Al.- ��Ct!RT
RELATE:) FtJJif'.):?JS.
City Administrator recoLimendeu approval in order tc. rro-
vide capability to witness complaints in abserc; - o-•
unavailability of City Recorder.
Motion to adopt: Councilman Moore, seconded b,,7 Councilman
Mickelson.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
13. RESOLUTION No. 76-11 RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD C: Y "OUr;1. r
C ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC II• PROVF.Mr',PTS CON-
STRUCTED WITHIN SAI,EA FREEtfAY SUBDIVISTON
AND AUTHORIZING RELEASE OFTHv_ pgATNImg,.;_
ANCE BOND THEREFORE.
PAGE 6. - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 9, 1976
3; i�;` . :ifia- .Y,2S ;i�:D ,e0C ii::i�:..... sOit :c.:.2. 3c::ep% the
vr.'_thir_ Salem Free--
;•Jay �� .;:I.'rj.Sl.c. cl::'� t- '��=.ii;'_ re'leas, cf the
1� )r;. . Zi`:. .'L�1 Jrle:f$7 8 e.a i.Y 3t the City's
requixe!nerits har. been ::et.
Motion to adopt: Councilman Coon, secon=ed by
Councilman Mickelson.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council creseri
14. RESOLUTION No. 76-12 RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPRO"vr :_" ?NTS
COIvSTRUCTED WITHIN PATHFINDER SUB-
DIVISION.
(a) City Administrator recommended Council accept the
public improvements constructed within Pathfinder
Subdivision.
Motion to adopt: Councilman Mickelson, seconded by
Councilman Cook.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
15. ORDINANCE No. 76-6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING
"- CHAPTER 10.28, OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL
CODE BY ADDING TO SECTION 10.28.130 TO
PROHIBI'1 PARKING ON A PORTION OF COMMER-
CIAL STREET LYING EASTERLY OF MAIN STREET
DECLARING AN E'iri"F.RGENCY AND FIXING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
(a) City Administrator recommended Council approval
and stated that in order to eliminate street
congestion: ;7y Girods there i.= a need for additional
room for street improvement:; wh=et, would consist
of right and left Nand turn lanes entering; onto
Main Street,
Motion_ to adopt: Councilman Moore, seconded by (Iouncil-
man Cook.
Approved by unanimous vote of Counciz present.
16. ORDINANCE No. 76-7 AN ORDINANCE A146110- ING ANI) SUPPL NIFE'1•4TfNG
CHAPTER 10.28, OF THE TIGARD M' 1iC_T.P;AL
CODE BY ADDING TO SECTION 10.28.130 TO
PROHIBIT PARKING ON S4ti :JNZT._KER STREET'
DYING SOUTHEASTERLY OF HALL E-tOLLEVkWD,
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
PAGE 7 — COUNCIL MMT1JTES — FEBRUARY 9, 1976
;7((
4
appr
0,vai so
l as 11r.. _\�):Z o i till
a� :.reg :L .:-, :�.a,
; itcther stated
plan a n ncve . uncil not
t v r._rd, de-
and :,.._,-t; �_ an:-e i t o. 76-7 puts
t le Co :�� ._'ins _01 e`,rious pie.^_z p ion into law.
Motion to adopt: Councilman rook, seconded by Councilman
Moore.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
17. ORDINANCE No. 76-8 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING
CHAPTER 10.28, OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL
CODE BY ADDING TO SECTION 10.28.130 TO
PROHIBIT PARKING ON A PORTION OF SCOTT
COURT LYING WESTERLY OF SW 98TH AVENUE,
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
(a) City Administrator recommended Council approval.
Motion to adopt: Councilman Mickelson, seconded by
Councilman Cook.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
18. STATUS REPORT POLICE LIFE INSURANCE
(a) City Administrator reported that insurance meeting all
State requirements had been purchased successfully in
accordance with Council direction.
19. OTHER
(a) Budget Committee Discussion Session set for Thursday,
February 26th. at 7:30 p.m. location of meeting; will
be arranged and committee u-11-1. be notified.
(b) City .Administrator noted ti-tat Llecuric. O. i;.C.C. license
had been denied.
(c) Council requested staff to drag; up resolutions of
commendation for citizens of Tigard ha��ina served on
various boards and committees.
20. ADJOURNMENT 11:10 P. M.
ATTEST: C±ty Recorder y
or
L
'? PAGE 8 - COUNCIL MINUTES -- FEBRUARY 9, 1976
1
BILLS PAYABLE
Z FEBRUARY : 9, 1976
GENERAL FUND - U.S. NATIONAL BANK
Check No.
18424 James Farmer - Kaiser Insurance Refund (616B) $ 6.52
18425 Michael Smith - Witness Fee (11) 5.48
18426 George Kelty, Jr. - Witness Fee (11) 5.96
18458 Tigard Credit Union - Payroll Withholding (619) 24.00
18459 Banker's Life - Payroll Withholding (608A) 1,251.43
18460 U. S. National Bank - Payroll Withholding (613) 2,406.70
18461 Public Employees Retire. Board - Social Security (11) 42.06
(12) 142.10 (13) 184.04 (14) 188.51 (16) 1321.86 (16.3) 68.75
(18) 21.29 (612) 1968.61 3,937.22
18462 Oregon State Tax - Payroll Withholding (614) 1,711.00
18463 I.C.M.A. Retire. Corp. - Retirement (104) 110.00
18464 Traveler's Ins. - Retirement (13) 59.07 (14) 54.79 (608B) 149.66 263.52
18465 Tri-City Federal Credit Union - Payroll Withholding (609C) 50.00
18466 Tigard Community Federal Credit Union - Payroll Withholding (609A) 363.68
18467 Washington Co. Federal Credit Union - Payroll Withholding (609B) 932.00
18468 Tigard Police Officer' s Assn. - Payroll Withholding (611) 181.00
18469 Oregon Admin. Co. - Payroll Withholding (619) 32.12
18470 Dept. of Commerce - Bldg. Permit Surcharge (623) 122.34
18471 Oregon Dental Service - Dental Insurance (11) 12.88 (12) 40.74
(13) 53.62 (14) 61.11 (16) 333.57 (16.3) 12.88 (18) 20.37 535.17
18473 Beaverton Ins. Agencies - Police Insurance (106) 52.00
18474 Bureau of Management & Budget - Booklet (12) ' 2.50
18475 William Sprague - Witness Fee (11) 5.32
18476 Rex Gordon - Witness Fee (11) 5.64
18477 Addressograph - Multigraph - Masters (18) 46.80
18478 N.W. Natural Gas Co. - Utilities (18) 148.75 (20) 363..30 512.05
18479 Purnell Education - Books (15) 105.00
18480 Don Thomas Petroleum - Super Shell (13) 13.49 (19) 11.20 24.69
18481 Xerox - Equipment Rental (622) 13.50
18482 Chalet Pancake House - Spec. Executive Session (10) 11.40
18483 Wilbur A. Bishop - Mileage (10) 20.40
18484 Maryatt Industries - Laundry (20) 20.20
18485 Rentex - Laundry (18) 13.35
18487 Tigard Times - Notice of Public Hearing (10) 17.15
18488 Mr. C's Photo Factory - Film & Processing (14) 2.52
18489 Cascade Arch. & Eng. - Blackline Paper (14) 36.77
18490 Schwenn, Bradley, Batchelor, Bailey - January Legal Service
(11) 280.00 (18) 422.00 702.00
18491 Don Thomas Petroleum - Super Shell (13) 5.99 (19) 11.43 17.42
18492 Tigard Lumber & Bldg. Supply - Misc. Bldg. Supplies (17) 1.70
(17.3) 15.80 17.50
18493 Times Publication - Notice of Public Hearings (14) 6.65
BD U.S. National Bank - Payroll Withholding (610) 150.00
$13,721.00
Payroll 22,131.42
$35,852.42
SEWER FUND - U.S. NATIONAL BANK
Check No.
18460 U.S. National Bank - Payroll Withholding (613) $ 492.00
Bills Payable
February 9, 1976
Page 2
Check No.
( 18461 Public Employees Retire. Bd. - Social Security (101) 204.70
(612) 204.70 $ 409.40
18462 Oregon State Tax - Payroll Withholding (614) 176.00
18464 Traveler's Ins. - Payroll Withholding (608B) 125.37
18466 Tigard Community Fed. Credit Union - Payroll Withholding (6O9A) 50.00
18467 Washington Co. Federal Credit Union - Payroll Withholding (6O9B) 80.50
18469 Oregon Administration Co. - Payroll Withholding (619) 6.66
18471 Oregon Dental Service - Dental Insurance (108) 53.64
3642 Doug's Auto Parts - Misc. Auto Supplies (210) 56.40
18490 Schwenn, Bradley, Batchelor, Bailey - Legal Services (29OL) 438.00
3145 Unified Sewerage Agency (753 - 755.1) 33,957.99
$35,845.96
Payroll 2,523.21
$38,369.17
ASSESSMENT FUND - U.S. NATIONAL BANK
Check No.
3635 First National Bank - Coupons (851) $ 28.75
STATE TAX STREET FUND - U.S. NATIONAL BANK
Check No.
18458 Tigard Credit Union - Payroll Withholding (619) $ 36.00
18461 Public Employees Retire. Board - Social Security (101) 204.70
(612) 204.70 409.40
18462 Oregon State Tax - Payroll Withholding (614) 176.00
18464 Traveler's Ins. - Retirement (104) 128.65
18466 Tigard Community Federal Credit Union - Payroll Withholding (6O9A) 259.10
18467 Washington County Federal Credit Union - Payroll Withholding (6O9B) 80.50
18471 Oregon Dental Service - Dental Insurance (108) 53.64
3643 Electromatic Assoc. Inc. - Antenna (240) 4.00
3649 Tigard Water District - Utilities (260) 14.50
3651 Union Oil - Diesel (210) 82.29
18480 Don Thomas Petroleum - Super Shell (210) 26.16
3653 Casey Tractor & Equip. - Tractor Parts (240) 57.25
3654 Feenaughty'- Machinery -,Parts for Wayne Sweeper (240) 56.83
3656 Power Rents - Rental Space Heater (214) 24.80
3657 Rodda Paint - Paint Cook Park Restrooms (240) 94.29
3660 Tigard Sand & Gravel - Rock (220) 30.12
3661 Tualatin Valley Paving Co. - Street Patching (220) 50.62
18491 Don Thomas Petroleum - Super Shell (210) 65.71
18492 Tigard Lumber Co. - Building Supplies (240) 10.38
3662 P.G.E. - Street Lighting (282) 4,284.66
$5,944.90
Payroll 2,388.19
$8,333.09
FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUND - U.S. NATIONAL BANK
Check No.
18460 U.S. National Bank - Payroll Withholding (613) $ 334.00
18461 Public Employee Retire. Board - Social Security (15) 76.89
(21) 148.74 (612) 225.63 451.26
18462 Oregon State Tax - Payroll Withholding (614) 253.00
18464 Traveler's Ins. - Retirement (15) 31.26 (21) 76.28
(6O8B) 145.69 253.23
18466 Tigard Community Federal Credit Union - Payroll Withholding (6O9A) 243.46
18469 Oregon Administration Co. - Payroll Withholding (619) 7.28
18471 Oregon Dental Seriice - Dental Ins. (15) 12.88 (21) 40.74 53.62
Bills Payable
February 9, 1976
Page 3
i
Check No.
. 18478 N.W. Natural Gas - Utilities (15) 92.13 (16) 26.21 $ 118.34
18480 Don Thomas Petroleum - Super Shell (16) 437.79
3641 Canyon Chrysler Plymouth - 2 arm rests (16) 16.80
3642 Doug's Auto Parts - Misc. Auto Supplies (16) 146.72
3644 American Federation of Police - Book for Lawmen (16) 17.70
3645 Halray Auto Supp*y - Misc. Auto Parts (16) 40.63
3646 Miller's Auto Supply - Misc. Auto Supplies (16) 331.80
3647 Mainline Book - 1 set Chilton Auto Manuals (15) 27.07
3648 E & H Machine Works - Skin Cleaner (16) 17.85
3650 J. Thayer - Forms (21) 5.40
3652 Valley Communications - Repair Police Radio (16) 66.00
18485 Rentex - Laundry (15) 4.30 (16) 5.75 10.05
3655 Sales Nine-T-Nine - Misc. Auto Supplies & Towing (16) 37.09
3658 Southwest Office Supplies - Rubber Stamp (16) 7.20
3659 Roger Thomssen - Recording (21) 24.00
18488 Mr. C's Photo Factory - Film & Processing (16) 51.61
18491 Don Thomas Petroleum - Super Shell (16) 395.91
18492 Tigard Lumber Co. - Bldg. Supplies (16) 1.39
BD U.S. National Bank - Payroll Withholding (610) 18.75
$3,367.95
Payroll 2,289.65
$5,657.60
Bills Payable $58,908.56
Payroll (January) 29,332.47
TOTAL BILLS PAYABLE $8$,241.03
_ . CaYx�rr►
-IT 7&
. Sb /
COLUMBIA REGION ASSOCIATION of GOVERNMENTS
CRAG+ 527 S.W. HALL S
y TREET (503) 221-1646
PORTLAND,OREGON 97201
LARRY RICE,EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
January 22, 1976 RECEIVED
JAN 2 3 1975
REGULAR MEMBERS
CLACKAMAS COUNTY CITY OF T16ARD
Barlow Mr. Bruce Clark, City Manager
Canby
EstacadaCity of Tigard
Gladstone P.O. Box 23557
Happy Valley
Johnson City Tigard, Oregon 97223
Lake Oswego
Milwaukie
Molalla Dear Mr. Clark:
Oregon City
Rivergrove
Sandy As the representative of the Cities of Washington
West Linn County on the CRAG executive board, I would like to
Wilsonville
MULTNOMAH COUNTY take this new year as an opportunity to describe some
Fairview difficulties and to explain some of the opportunities
Gresham that I think we have. It is important to recognize
Maywood Park
Portland that the influence of the cities is out-of-proportion
Troutdale to our voting power, and we should leave no avenue for
Wood Village
service to our cities untravelled.
WASHINGTON COUNTY
Banks
Beaverton CRAG should be viewed as an association of governments;
Come11Os an extension, if you will, of the local government
Durham
Forest Grove philosophy to the regional level. The dilemma is this:
Gaston If we view (as is widely done) CRAG as an additional
Hillsboro
King City layer of government and use our influence to limit the
North Plalna performance of the organization as much as possible, we
Sherwood
Tigard may succeed and at least the agency will not function
Tualatin well. The result though would be the opposite of that
ASSOCIATE MEMBERS intention--certain coordinative functions would continue
CLARK COUNTY at a level that is. less accessible to our influence.
Vanm:mr We would see a proliferation of more single-purpose
Washougal districts created perhaps at the state level and in
Columbia City other ways see a transfer of what ought to be local
Scappoose
St.Helens concerns to state control. Another loss to Washington
The Port of Portland County Cities would be a lack of voice in metropolitan
Td-Met
decisions and a return to feudal competition with the
State TheheState of Oregon
City of Portland and Multnomah County. On the other
hand, we could press for CRAG taking a more active
role--supporting local government concerns--expanding
our influence in areas where now our powers are being
eroded. The attendant increase in the powers of CRAG
will not come at the expense of local government, but
on the contrary will provide us resources jointly which
we could never attain by the loose, informal way we now
Ccoordinate our inter--governmental affairs.
APPOINTMENTS
To ensure coordination of activities on the various commit-
tees, the appointment by each jurisdiction of people to
participate at each planning level is invited. I need names
of persons who could fill vacancies on CRAG' s Community
Development Technical Advisory Committee and Aging Advisory
Committee. It is important that our view be represented at
each level, so if you would forward your recommendation to
me, I will take care of it.
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
Viewed in the abstract, the citizen participation element of
the CRAG planning effort should be limited to the CRAG
membership--even as the cities limit it to their own
citizens. However, the State law seems to require some
comment from regional citizens on regional matters. It is
not clear to me what a regional citizen is, and I remain
unconvinced as to the usefulness of that concept anyway. As
it seems wrong for CRAG to enter our cities to seek comment
on matters without our knowledge, we should ourselves fill
that vacuum. When approached on any question that requires
"citizen participation" , we should trigger our own process
and then relay the comment to CRAG. In fact, it may come to
a choice between CRAG requiring cities to have a citizen
process on regional matters, or having a regional citizen
participation program. There are those people who are not
accountable to anyone who are urging the latter upon us, and
I view it as a subversion of representative government.
Again, I recommend that each city use its own citizens who
are just as qualified as anyone to be regional citizens and
respond as a city to the various questions.
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
The General Assembly is the real authority of CRAG, and each
city represents itself at' those meetings. It is my obser-
vation that an important balance of power is held by the
cities and could be wielded by the Cities of Washington
County, if only we take great care for all of us to attend.
Please appoint alternates and make sure we are always there.
THE CRAG BUDGET
The General Assembly will be beginning its review of the
CRAG 1976-77 budget soon. Please forward comments to me.
For example, the "grantsman" of CRAG is essentially a
creation of the budget committee and it needs to know if he
has been of any help to the smaller cities.
Thank you,
David McBride
Mayor of Beaverton
DM:nf
2:1-2
sba
COLUMBIA REGION ASSOCIATION of GOVERNMENTS
CRAG 527 S.W. HALL STREET
iY (503) 221-1645
PORTLAND,OREGON 97201
RECEIVED
LARRY RICE,EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR January 26, 197 6
JAN 2 3 1975
REGULAR MEMBERS
CLACKAMAS COUNTY
Barlow CITY OF. TIGARD
Canby Mr. Bruce P. Clark
Estacada
Gladstone City Administrator
Happy Valley P.O. Box 23557
Johnson City
Lake Oswego 12420 S.W. Main
Milwaukie Tigard, Oregon 97223
Molalla
Oregon City
Rivergrove Dear Bruce:
Sandy
West Linn
Wilsonville You have expressed concern, together with others in the
MULTNLINTY
Fairview Tigard area, regarding the amount of traffic on Pacific
Fairview
Gresham Highway West through your city. Last fall your City
Maywood Park
Portland Council adopted a resolution, supported also by King
Troutdale City, which called for the investigation of and develop-
Wood Village ment of a by-pass.
WASHINGTON COUNTY
Banks Although some time has gone by since that resolution,
Beaverton
Cornelius we have been working here to review the possibilities
Durham for such traffic relief. This letter is an acknowledge-
Forest Grove
Gaston ment of your concern and an indication to you that we
Hillsboro are actively pursuing solutions to the traffic problems
King City
North Plains on Pacific Highway West.
Sherwood
Tigard
Tualatin Currently, we are meeting with county and city planners
ASSOCIATE MEMBERS and traffic engineers to develop possible projects to
CLARK COUNTY relieve traffic problems in various cities and counties
Vancou1ef in `this region. In this round of meetings, we will be
Washougal talking to John Crockett of Washington County and Dick
Columbia City Bolen of Tigard, as well as Dave Bryan of Tualatin, to
Scappoose investigate the possibilities for developing a by-pass
St.Helens
The Port of Portland to Tigard that would be in keeping with your resolu-
Trl-Met tion.
The State of Oregon
Yours truly,
Othar ').1herrington, Directo
Transportatilanning
RE:ls
1:18
cc: Mr. Byron M. Billings
Thursday, December 25, 1975 Hillsboro Argus 11A
c G, LCDC goals, �
look si
milar t® �S®v
- 1et P®mer®
(Editor's note: The following article, would regulate the entire life of the voice for meeting the mutual needs of
country- the Pacific Northwest."
co
"Blueprint for a New Society," was Theplanhad its eye from first to last This organization (outside the whole
written by Mrs.Mary Kangas of Rt. 1, upon the needs of the consumers. The of industry)is called the Pacific North-
Scappoose.) _ plan demanded that every individual west Economic Development Com-
enterprise should pass under public mission and was formed at the request
BY MARY I{ANGAS control, that every source of raw of the federal government, without a
material, with every acre of land, vote of the people or of the Legislatures
When I first read the Goals &
should ass into public ownership. of the states involved.
Guidelines of LCDC and CRAG, I P p I find it interesting that in 1973 the
realized I had read these words America has a Committee for Oregon Legislature provided for an
somewhere before this. I tried to Economic Development,first set up by a ointed commission to the Economic
remember,but I read so much that it Franklin Roosevelt, which gives Development Division.
kept eluding me. research and advisory service to more The "Soviet Power" informs us the
Then I decided to straighten my than a dozen departments and agen- workers needed the stimulus of a great
bookcase (a major undertaking), and cies, including the White House. Vision and a great program which
as will happen with such a project I was The council has no official status.It is developed at length into the five-year
randomly glancing through the books outside the whole of industry. Its plans.
, writing to Krzhizhanovsky in
when I came upon one I had read about blueprint calls for: Confining popular Lenin
five years ago. elections to members of policy-making 1920, said, "Couldn't you produce a
It was entitled "The Soviet Power, bodies of government; severely plan,not a technical plan but a political
and as I leafed through the pages I reducing the number of 500,000 locally scheme,which would be understood by
realized I was reading the Goals & elected officials, paid and unpaid; the proletariat?
Guidelines of LCDC and CRAG. having a single chief executive, either "For instance,in five years we shall
I forgot the bookcase, got out my elected or appointed, for each local build 20 power stations covering the
copies of the G&G and other pertinent government remaining in operation; country with a network of such stations.
redrawing cumbersome state con- We need such a plan at once to give the
documentation, and for the next two
weeks I proceeded to compare them stitutions to allow needed local masses a shining unimpeded prospect
with the book. changes;community problems needing to work for,and in those years we shall
In that book is contained the direc- attention involve education, public electrify the whole of Russia."
tives for all of the regressive, socialist welfare, health, urban transportation, So, the Russian masses endured
gobbledegook that is plagueing us slum clearance and redevelopment and because they lived in the future — a
today, namely, communal child care, economic development,and the way in new political system,a new freedom,a
metro transportation, women's lib, which this would be accomplished is to new emancipation for the individual
computerized CRISS and PPBS to reconstruct counties. and a new distribution of the products
mention a few. They feel that more effective local of industry on a more equitable basis,
This article will compare the above government would result from a all these fruits were to be reaped in the
subjects with "The Soviet Power." smaller slate of elected officials, and future. (By the way, they are still
"Soviet Power" informs us that to under their system,there would be no waiting.)
ascertain the needs of the community more elections of departmental heads It was for this reason that Lenin had
demands an organization outside the in government. seized upon this gradiose scheme of
whole of industry, an organization This committee's good will and ad- electrification. A commission was
which would voice directly, as the .Vice are sought eagerly by bureaucrats, appointed in 1921 to work out a plan for
spokesman or representative of the cabinet members and the President. electrification of the whole country.
whole community, what things the (Do any of these suggestions sound The State Planning Commission,
community has need of, and that in- familiar? Most of them have been commonly called the Gosplan, was
volved a plan. implemented under home rule, and charged by decrees with working out
The plan is described as "the first LCDC and CRAG will take care of the the General Comprehensive Plan. The
organ in the world for carrying out in rest of them.) plan involved a fight from the first,
practice the theory that each citizen is conomic Develop- however,"if an economic process,"we
part of a great human family and has merit Division and egon has an its long-range goals read in the Economic Survey of the
rights in that family, in so far as he State Bank of the USSR, "takes place
performs his duties to
it. (Sound are to sustain a level of economic ac- that is not provided for in the Plan,then
familiar?). fluffy in the state which will supporta the Bank is in the position to signal the
"In the plan lay the instrument high standard of living for the citizens breach in the sector of the planned
destined to fashion a new order,not in of Oregon while maintaining the state's
front."
Russia alone,but at length throughout quality of environment and livabilit . America also needed the stimulus of
However, this apparently was not
the whole world." satisfactory to the federal government, a great vision and a great program,in
Consequently,on Dec.5,.1917,a body, order to condition them to accept the
called the Supreme Council of Public s oVi 1972 Vthen d Governor Andress loss of their right to private property
Economy, was appointed, with ex- .+ and the regulation of their lives.
i ceedingly wide powers, to produce met in Vancouver and formed a However,since Congress had refused
general plans and estimates which common organization with a common
to pass land-use legislation and What are these goals? Complete program that allows citizens to par-
America already was electrified,what control of the use of your land and the ticipate in all phases of planning
political scheme could be produced to regulation of your life. processes. (Translation: "We've got to
keep the people living in the future SB 100,Part I,sec.3,(8)provides for listen to them because HUD says so,so
while the schemers confiscated their councils of government,and SB 769 was let's hurry and listen so we can get on
land and regulated their lives in the enacted because the Legislature found with what we are going to do.")
present? that it was a matter of statewide con- 2—Define roles and responsibilities
During 1971 Laurance Rockefeller set cern to establish a representative among local and regional jurisdictions.
up his own Land-use Task Force, regional plan, thereby usurping the (Local roles and responsibilities
financed from the tax-exempt constitutional duties of elected local already have been defined under the
Rockefeller Brothers Fund. officials and ignoring the thousands of Constitution, and that document (foes
This task force stated, "What is citizens who appeared at hearings to not provide for regional jurisdictions.)
needed is a changed attitude toward protest the passage of this bill. 3—Determine and apply the regional
land, not simply a growing awareness LCDC's and CRAG's political scheme carrying capacity. (Up to this point I
of the importance of stewardship,but a for the "environment" is the same as have been unable to get anyone in
separation of commodity rights in the Lenin's political scheme for "elec- CRAG to define carrying capacity.
land from the urbanization rights." trification." CRAG tells us the task force has chosen
In other words,you can "own" your The people of Russia now rent the to leave the term and its use undefined
land and your business and pay the land they once owned, because they during the three months of public
taxes,but the government will tell you lived in the future instead of guarding discussion,which means that as soon as
how and whether you may use it. what they had in the present. it has gotten rid of the public, it will
In 1972 a group of environmental Remember that we are inundated define it any way it chooses.)
experts met in Stockholm, under the with statements and studies from Under definitions in CRAG's goals is
guidance of the United Nations,to draw CRAG, indoctrinating us with the 1990 this statement: "A priority of human
up the plans for worldwide environmEnt transportation plans and the needs and environmental concerns
control, and David Rockefeller headed nonexistent population explosion of the which must be met." Lenin's political
the American delegation. year 2000. scheme used the words "community
Subsequently, Russel Train, a faith- "Soviet Power" tells us that needs and electrification."
ful Rockefeller retainer,was chosen to "socialist organization had great ad- There is no difference between the
head the new Federal Environmental vantages in electrification because it political schemes,the result is the same
Protection Agency and nationally feared no property rights." Under — abolition of private property and
implement the goals arrived at in socialist SB 100 and SB 769, CRAG and regulation of our lives.
Stockholm. LCDC have great advantages in en- The decision lies with us. We can
The National Environmental Policy vironrnent because they will soon have repeal SB 100 and SB 769 and live in the
Act (NEPA) requires all agencies of to fear no property rights. present as freemen,or we can go along
the federal government to consider the "Soviet Power" states the "plan with the socialistic plans for the future
environment in all their decisions. must supply all the needs of the masses as outlined by CRAG and live as
An environmental impact statement for clothing, food, housing, education, regulated serfs on our own land.
must be prepared for scrutiny by the health, leisure/recreation."
federal ecologists, and although this LCDC's and CRAG's goals are to
could not legally stop an action, com- secure the basic food,clothing,housing,
plying with the demands of federal education and recreation for the
bureaucrats causes delay,and delay is masses of the region. "Soviet Power"
most always the end of a project. The promises to provide personal security
schemers are well aware of this, and and safety for all and profitable em-
you can witness this in the Amax ployment for all. The plan lifts the
Aluminum squabble. So, they have emphasis of life from personal
control over private uses of land. acquisition to socialist accumulation.
America could not be electrified, but CRAG promises to secure your
America could and is being en- personal safety,continuing income and
vironmented, which accomplishes the employment, and safeguard the
same purpose — abolition of private property of all the region's citizens.
property and regulation of our lives. "Soviet Power" informs us the plan
And,as the Bank of Russia steps in to produces a sense of identity and
signal the breach in the planned front, belonging and a sense of adventure.
so also does the A-95 process, revenue CRAG will secure for you a sense of
sharing and all free federal funds, belonging,of achieving identity and the
signal the breach in our planned freedom to explore and grow.
economy and keep our officials in line. Of course CRAG, laboring under its
Oregon's political scheme arrived Utopian dream of collective security,
when ex-Sen. Hector McPherson, with never once seems to remember that all
the help of a publication called Feed- the rights it is going to secure for you
back and a grant from HUD, pushed were secured 200 years ago in the Bill of
through SB 100, which implemented a Rights.
State Planning Commission,commonly "Soviet Power" informs us of the
called LCDC,which was charged with five-year plans. CRAG's Goals & f
setting up a General Comprehensive Guidelines also include five-year plans.
Plan. CRAG's procedural goal No.7 tells us
All local plans will conform to the that to balance the human and en-
state plan, or the LCDC can prescribe vironmental goals through agreed-upon
and amend such plans,ordinances and standards and procedures for planning,
regulations that do not comply with these measures must be taken:
statewide planning goals. i—Develop a citizen involvment
w
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CRAG RULES
Attached are proposed Rules for Adopting and Implementing
the CRAG Goals and Objectives, Comprehensive Plan, and Land Use
Framework element of the Comprehensive Plan. Hearings on the
Rules will be held at the times and places already announced
for hearings on the Goals and Objectives and Framework Plan.
Additional copies of the Rules will be available at the
learings or may be obtained by contacting Dick Paulson at CRAG,
(221-1646 x. 352) .
COLUMBIA REGION ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
527 S. W. Hall St.
Portland, Oregon 97201
/.l
a
,r
j
i
PROPOSED RULES ADOPTING AND IMPLEMENTING
THE CRAG GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Section 1. Authority and Purpose
These rules are adopted pursuant to ORS 197.735 (4) ,
197.750 (1) (f) , and 197.755 (1) for the purpose of adopting
and implementing the "CRAG Regional Land Use Planning Goals
and Objectives" , hereinafter referred to. as the "Goals and
Objectives", a copy of which is attached hereto or available
for inspection at CRAG offices.
Section 2. Adoption
The Goals and Objectives are hereby adopted and shall be
implemented as required in these rules.
Section 3. Application
(a) It is declared to be the policy and intent of the Board
of Directors that the Goals and Objectives apply directly to the
preparation of the CRAG Comprehensive Plan, and indirectly to plans
of its members, rather than to individual land use decisions, and
that land use decisions must be in accordance with comprehensive
t
plans, both regional and local. It is further declared to be the
intent of the Board that conformity of member's plans to the Goals
and Objectives be required and assured by means of conformity of
member's plans to the CRAG Comprehensive Plan and elements thereof.
(b) Pursuant to (a) above, the Goals and Objectives are
hereby made mandatory as to the CRAG Comprehensive Plan and said
Plan shall conform to the provisions of the Goals and Objectives
f,
upon adoption of said Plan. Elements of the CRAG Comprehensive
{ 1,
w •
Plan adopted prior to completion- of the entire Plan shall conform
to those Goals and Objectives which apply to each element.
(c) Pursuant to (a) above, the Goals and Objectives are hereby
made advisory as to the members of CRAG, their comprehensive
plans and their planning processes.
Section 4. Implementation
(a) The Goals and Objectives shall be implemented by the
CRAG Comprehensive Plan, and may be further implemented by desig-
nation and regulation of areas and activities of significant
regional impact.
(b) Comprehensive plans or plan elements adopted by members
shall conform to the CRAG Comprehensive Plan or elements thereof
as required in adopted rules implementing the Comprehensive Plan.
r
T
2.
(Proposed amendment to existing CRAG procedural rules for the
adoption of goals and objectives)
"Section 4 Review, Revision and Amendment
(a) The Goals and Objectives shall be regularly and com-
prehensively reviewed and, if necessary, revised every four (4)
years. Such review shall include a staff review and report to
the Board of Directors, committee recommendations, receipt of
comments and proposals from members and an opportunity for
effective citizen participation.
(b) Any agency or individual within the CRAG region may at
any time petition the Board of Directors to amend the Goals and
Objectives. Such petition shall be in writing on a form provided
by, and submitted to, the Executive Director. Such completed
petition shall be considered by the Board of Directors and petitions
may be summarily denied or approved for consideration. If. so
approved, the Board shall cause the proposed amendment to be
further considered at or during a designated time each year, said
time to be designated by resolution, under the provisions of the
CRAG Procedural Rules for the Adoption of Regional Land Use
Planning Goals or Objectives prior to adoption of said amendment. "
AJ:ls
4:19-20
3.
PROPOSED RULES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
CRAG COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Section 1. Authority and Purpose
These rules are adopted pursuant to ORS 197.735 (4) , 197.750 (1) (f)
and 197.755 for the purpose of implementing the CRAG Comprehensive
Plan, hereinafter referred to as the "Plan", or elements thereof.
These rules shall not apply to "interim" regional plans adopted
by CRAG.
Section 2. Conformity to -the Plan
Comprehensive plans or elements of such plans adopted by
members and shall be made to conform to the Plan and elements
thereof within six (6) months from the date of adoption of each
Plan element and members shall maintain such conformity thereafter.
Upon revision or amendment of the Plan or any element thereof,
the comprehensive plans or elements of such plans of members shall
be made to conform to the Plan as revised or amended within sir,- (6)
months from the date of such revision or amendment.
Section 3. Rules For Implementation of Plan Elements
(a) Each plan element adopted by the Board of Directors
shall be adopted by rule.
(b) Rules adopting Plan elements may provide further
regulations and requirements for implementation of each element
consistent with the rules herein.
i
4.
� J
Section 4. Certification of Member Plans
(a) Upon conformity of each member' s comprehensive plan or
plan element to the Plan or each element of the Plan, the Board
of Directors shall certify that each such comprehensive plan so
conforms. For purposes of these rules, "conformity" shall require
that no conflict or inconsistency exists between the Plan or element
and the member' s comprehensive plan or element, and that the member' s
comprehensive plan or element contains and includes provisions
implementing each substantive requirement of the Plan as the Plan
applies to each member's jurisdiction.
(b) For purposes of certification, members shall submit
their comprehensive plans or plan elements to CRAG with a written
request for certification on or before six (6) months following
the date of adoption of each Plan element, or, if a member' s
comprehensive plan or plan element is incomplete at the end of the
six-month period, a member may request in writing an extension of
time to conform in accordance with Section 6 of these rules.
(c) All requests for certification shall be submitted to
and reviewed by the Executive Director and shall be submitted by
the Director with a recommendation to the Board within sixty
(60) days of receipt.
(d) After receipt of a member's comprehensive plan or plan
element by the Board of Directors, the Board shall certify the
comprehensive plan as being in conformity with the Plan or appli-
cable Plan element, or, if conformity is not found, the Board
may either grant an extension of time pursuant to Section 6
( herein, or order immediate changes in the member's comprehensive
5.
plan or element pursuant to Section 7 herein which will cause
the comprehensive plan or plan element to conform to the Plan or
applicable element.
Section 5. Extensions
(a) Upon a request by a member for certification of its
comprehensive plan or plan element and a finding by the Board of
non-conformity to the Plan, or upon a request by a member for
an extension of time to comply, the Board may grant extensions
of six (6) months or less. Upon or prior to the conclusion of
each member' s extension, the member shall either request certi-
fication or a further extension.
(b) Members may be granted extensions under (a) above upon
approval by the Board of a written request containing the following:
1. Statement of progress toward conformity
2. Statement of the reasons for current non-conformity
3. Proposed time schedule under which the member will
achieve conformity
(c) Extensions requested under this section may be granted
only upon demonstration by the requesting member of substantial
progress during the immediately preceding six-month period toward
conformity with the Plan or applicable element thereof.
(d) All requests for extensions shall be submitted to and
reviewed by the Executive Director. The Director shall, within
sixty (60) days of receipt, submit each request to the Board with
a recommendation.
6,
Section 6. Orders to Conform
�- The Board may at any time after six (6) months following the
adoption of the Plan, or any element of the Plan, order that member's
comprehensive plans or applicable plan elements be changed or
amended so as to conform to the Plan or element. Such order shall
include the changes necessary to cause the member' s comprehensive
plan or plan element to conform to the Plan or element thereof,
and shall provide a level of detail and specificity sufficient to
allow the member affected to implement the order without delay.
Section 7. Local Plan Changes
(a) Members shall submit all proposed changes or amendments
to their comprehensive plans to the Executive Director prior to
consideration and adoption of such changes or amendments.
(b) Upon receipt by the Executive Director of a proposed
change or amendment to a member' s comprehensive plan, the Director
shall determine whether the proposal would, if adopted by a
member, conform to the Plan and elements thereof, and shall submit
to the member, within ten (10) days of receipt of the proposal, a
written opinion as to such conformity. If, in the opinion of the
Director, the proposal would not conform to the Plan or elements
thereof, the Director shall provide in the written opinion
specific reasons for the opinion and any alternatives which might
assist the member in its final disposition of the proposal.
(c) Upon adoption by a member of any change or amendment to
its comprehensive plan, the change or amendment shall be submitted
to the Executive Director within ten (10) days of adoption. If the
change or amendment does not conflict with the written opinion of
7.
i
the Executive Director, the change or amendment shall be added to
l_. CRAG's copy of the applicable member's comprehensive plan. If the
change or amendment does conflict with the written opinion of the
Executive Director, the Director shall submit the change together
with the opinion to the Board of Directors at its next regular
meeting, and the Board shall thereupon cause the change or amend-
ment to be reviewed under applicable procedural rules as a contested
case and the opinion of the Executive Director shall thereafter be
considered as a petition for review of a contested case.
Section 8. Review of Local Land Use Actions
(a) Pursuant to ORS 197.755 (6) , the Board of Directors may
review land use actions taken pursuant to zoning, subdivision and
other similar ordinances and regulations of members in accordance with
the provisions of this section. "Action", as used in this section,
includes but is not limited to any adopted zone change, subdivision
or planned unit development approval, variance, conditional use permit
and any action or decision taken pursuant to or in implementation
of a member's zoning, subdivision or similar ordinance or regulation
which has a substantial effect or impact upon the Plan or element
thereof, or a substantial impact upon a member or members other
than the acting member. "Action" shall not include changes or
j amendments to local comprehensive plans.
(b) All reviews of actions shall be for the purpose of
assuring conformity of such actions with the Plan or elements thereof.
(c) The Board of Directors shall review actions upon petition
by any member of CRAG or by any person or group of persons whose
interests are substantially affected by the action. A petition
8.
J �
filed pursuant to this section must be filed not later than sixty
days (excluding Saturdays and holidays) after the date of final
adoption or approval of the action upon which the petition is
based. Petitions shall be on a form provided by the Executive
Director and shall state in detail how the action effects or impacts
upon the Plan or upon a member other than the acting member.
(d) Reviews under this section shall be based upon the record
of the proceedings, if any, prepared by the acting member with respect
to the action which is the subject of the petition, and shall be
conducted in accordance with CRAG procedural rules relating to
contested cases.
(e) Any member or any person or group of persons whose interests
are substantially affected by the action may intervene in, and be
made a party to, any review proceeding held under this section upon
approval by the Board of Directors or Hearings Officer of a request to
intervene from a member, person or group of persons or upon request
by the Board or Hearings Officer.
(f) All petitions for review shall be filed with the Executive
Director and transmitted by the Director to the Board at its next
regular meeting with a written opinion on the nature and degree of
impact of the action 6n the Plan and on members other than the acting
member. Upon receipt of a petition and Executive Director's opinion,
the Board shall summarily, and without hearing, determine whether the
action, which is the subject of the petition, does or may have a
substantial effect or impact upon the Plan or member other than the
acting member. If the Board finds such effect or impact, it shall
order that the action be reviewed in accordance with appropropriate
procedural rules. If the Board finds that no such effect or impact
exists, it may order that the petition be dismissed.
9.
• v f
(g) This section shall apply only to actions taken by
a member subsequent to the adoption of a Plan element and prior
to certification of conformity of such member's comprehensive
plan with such Plan element.
r
10.
2
r
(Proposed amendment to existing CRAG procedural rules for the
adoption of a Comprehensive Plan)
"Section 7 Regular Revision and Review
(a) The Plan or adopted elements thereof shall be regularly
and comprehensively reviewed and, if necessary, revised every
four (4) years. Such review shall include a staff review and
report to the Board of Directors, committee recommendations,
receipt of comments and proposals from members and an opportunity
a for citizen participation. Such review should be conducted
simultaneously with, or immediately following, comprehensive
i
s
review of the Goals and Objectives.
(b) Any agency or individual within the CRAG region may at
any time petition the Board of Directors to amend the Plan or
element thereof. Such petition shall be in writing on a form
i provided by, and submitted to, the Executive Director. Such
completed p petition shall be considered by the Board of Directors
and petitions may be summarily denied or approved for considera-
tion. If so approved, the Board shall cause the proposed amend-
ment to be further considered, at or during a specified time each
year simultaneously with or immediately following annual review
of Goals and Objectives, under the provisions of the CRAG Procedural
Rules for the Adoption of A Comprehensive Plan or Elements
Thereof prior to adoption of the amendment. "
11.
Y �
PROPOSED RULES FOR ADOPTION OF THE
LAND USE FRAMEWORK ELEMENT OF THE
CRAG COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Section 1. Authority and Purpose
These rules are adopted pursuant to ORS 197. 735 (4) , 197. 750 (f)
and 197.755 (2) for the purpose of adopting and implementing the
Land Use Framework element of the CRAG Comprehensive Plan.
Section 2. Adoption
The Land Use Framework element of the CRAG Comprehensive Plan,
attached hereto or available for inspection at CRAG offices,
is hereby adopted as an element of the CRAG Comprehensive Plan
and is hereinafter referred to as the "Framework Plan" .
Section 3. Implementation of Rural Area Densities
(a) After the date of adoption of these rules, no member
jurisdiction shall issue any building permits for new housing
unit construction of any type in area designated by the Framework
Plan as "Rural" unless and until such member jurisdiction has
conducted, within the jurisdiction, an inventory for each desig-
nated rural area which shows the number of "lots of record" , as
defined below, and the number of housing units existing in the
area at the time of adoption of these rules. Lots of record shall
be exempt from the provisions of this subsection.
(b) Upon preparation and completion of such inventory,
member jurisdictions shall determine from the inventory the
numbers at the time of such completion, of existing housing units
and the number of lots or record in each rural area, and shall
12.
determine the number of housing units permitted in each rural
area pursuant to the Framework Plan. If the total of existing
housing units and the lots or record equals or exceeds the
permitted number of residential units, henceforth building permits
for housing units in the area shall only be issued to owners of
lots of record. If the total is less than the permitted number,
building permits for housing units in the area may be issued to
applicants to the extent of the difference between the permitted
number of housing units and the existing units and lots of
record.
(c) Where a specific rural area is wholly or partially
bounded by Type 2 boundary lines, members may determine interim
locations for such boundaries for purposes of inventory prepa-
rations and application until such boundaries are certified
pursuant to Section 5 of these rules. Interim boundaries shall
not deviate substantially from the Type 2 boundary locations on
the Framework Plan map.
(d) "Lots of Record" , for purposes of these rules and of
the Framework Plan, shall mean duly recorded lots established
in accordance with state law governing partition and subdivision
of land and recorded prior to the date of adoption of these
rules upon which, at the time of adoption of these rules, no
housing unit is or has been placed, constructed or permitted by
valid building permit. Where the same owner owns two or more
recorded lots which are adjacent to each other along a common
boundary or boundaries, such adjacent lots shall be considered
as one lot of record. Where two recorded lots under the same
ownership are divided- by a dedicated public street or road or by
t 13.
a perennial waterway, the lots shall not be considered as one lot
of record.
(e) "Housing Unit" , for purposes of these rules and of the
Framework Plan, shall mean a residential living unit which has
either been placed or constructed, or for which a building permit
has been issued and is outstanding.
Section 4 Implementation of Natural Resource Area Densities
All requirements and provisions in Section 3 of these rules
pertaining to "Rural Areas" shall apply equally to each "Natural
Resource Area" as designated in the Framework Plan, except that
the residential unit maximum density for Natural Resource Areas
designated in the Framework Plan shall apply rather than rural
density restrictions.
Section 5. Boundary Lines
(a) Those boundary lines on the Framework Plan map which
are designated in the plan as Type 2 (broken lines) shall be
specifically defined and located in accordance with Section 5
(Certification of Member Plans) of the Rules for Implementation
of the CRAG Comprehensive Plan. Each member' s comprehensive
plan shall include and' designate specific locations of all Type 2
boundary lines within its jurisdiction, and upon certification of
each plan, the specific locations of such boundary lines indicated
in member' s plans shall also constitute the specific location of the
Type 2 boundary lines on the Framework Plan map. Thereafter,
such boundary lines may be amended in accordance with those
rules relating to review and revision of the CRAG Comprehensive
Plan.
a
14.
(b) Prior to adoption of specific locations of Type 2
boundary lines by members, each member shall submit the proposed
specific locations to the Executive Director of CRAG who shall,
within 30 days of such submission, and after coordinating such
proposals with applicable members, committees and other interested
persons and groups, submit to each such member an opinion regard-
ing the probable acceptability and conformity of each proposed Type
2 line location.
AJ:nf
S:900/7-10
.x
15.
• MARK O.HATFIELD
OREGON
a
�1 C�rf eco ,$f of e� .�ertiaf e
WASHINGTON.D.C. 20310
January 19, 1976
The Mayor and the City Council
City Hall
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Dear Friends:
In this letter I would like to suggest a format to provide more
effective communication between us. Some time ago you met with
Mr. Ken Levstone and provided him with impressions that have
been valuable to me in determining where present inadequacies may
exist, and what I might be able to do to eliminate them.
Further, your comments have suggested to me the possibility of
new services my office might be able to offer you and your
community. Would you please consider the following outline as a
means for us to proceed , and share with me any reactions you have
to it.
I. Legislative Matters
In consideration of bills before the Congress, I am assisted by
several members of my staff who make up what we call the
"legislative staff." With the occasional exception of field
hearings (hearings held outside of Washington) , all legislative
activity is localized in the Capitol and the Congressional office
buildings. At times I will try to alert you through mailings to
impending action on bills that might directly affect your
community. This may supplement, but my no means replace,
information you now receive through League of Cities or
Association of Counties publications. In order for you to be
effective in responding to such alerts or in initiating contact
on any legislative matter of concern to you, I would ask you to
write me directly at my office in Washington (463 Russell
Building, Washington, D.C. 20510) . I recommend that official
views of your city or county be communicated consistently through
one or selected correspondents (e.g. , the City Manager or County
Administrative Assistant) , so that I and my staff may respond
consistently with information we know will be of help, and that
your correspondent(s) will come to know exactly what kind of
information best helps my efforts on your behalf here in
Washington. Should a legislative matter of particular urgency
arise, a phone call should be made to one of my field offices
(Portland 221-3386, Salem 363-1629) concerning the subject. They
will relay the message to Washington, and I or one of my
Legislative Assistants will return the call as soon as possible.
This is not to preclude your sending me your personal views on
any matter at any time, however; your personal communication
i
The Mayor and the City Council January 19, 1976 PG: 2
should not in any way be considered superfluous next to the
i above-described system.
II. Federal Programs
Once a bill becomes law, the program it establishes becomes the
purview of my "program staff," people who assist me in serving as
ombudsman or liaison between community organizations and the
Federal Government. Federal regulations, requirements, grant
systems, or bureaucratic red tape that cause you concern should
be brought to my attention in the same manner as legislative
matters. Here again, I will at times try to alert you to new
programs as they are beginning to be set up.
III. Case Work
Should an individual with a problem involving the Federal
Government happen to come to you, please feel free to refer this
person directly to one of my field offices. I have recently
moved my entire case operation to Oregon in order to better serve
such individual citizens.
It is my hope that working closer with you will help accomplish
greater things for the public we serve. I plan further
expansions of my operations in Oregon as resources permit and
will keep you apprised of such developments.
Sincerely,
Mark 0. Hatfield
United States Senator
MOH:shc
I
j �+
<Gx��%fLXiL. �'/•�Zvf r'G�tom/
` , AN Arnfac COMPANY
PECEIVED
JAN - 9 1976
January 8, 1976 CITY Of. TIGARD
Mr. Butch Kienow
9840 S.W. River Road
Milwaukie, Oregon 97222
To: Butch Kienow
Your Community Safety Committee recommends an expenditure of $350 to the
Tigard Police Department.
The expenditure would be for a film and visual, aids to be used by the
Police Department instructors for a neighborhood first-aid training
program.
The training program would be given to groups from schools, churches and
community organizations.
A film and visual aids would be the first step in developing a basic .
community first-aid programa
Sid Reese
Manager, Executive Services
cc: Bruce Clark ✓
t
Lamb-Weston,a Division of Amfac Foods,Inc.
General Office: 6600 S.W.Hampton Street e P.O.Box 23517 • Portland.Oregon 97223
Phone 503/639.8612 • TWX 910!458.8796 • Cable: LAMBWESTON
tigvLircl
SCHOOL DISTRICT 23J �G%�'Z�wv •�LcLG�'
TIGARD SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
i •9000 S.W. DURHAM ROAD
TIGARD, OREGON 97223
r' Area Code (503) 639-2151
December 22, 1975
a ,
X
v'
G _
4 Chief Of Police
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Dear Chief:
The administrative and counseling staff of Tigard Senior
High School wish to express our satisfaction with the assis-
tance Officer Charles Martin has provided us in working with
students. The program initiated this year by the Tigard
Police Department placing an officer on juvenile matters is
viewed as very helpful to youngsters in this community.
Officer Martin' s competency and interest in working with
young people is observable and impressive.
A
Sincerely yours,
Darwin Shinn
Principal
DS/fk
r
y,
{
k •
s}]
1