City Council Packet - 10/28/1968 TI GARD CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 28, 1968, 7:30 P.M.
1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor E.G. 'Kyle, Councilmen Floyd H. Bergmann,
Robert C. Moore, Harvey L. Knauss; Fred. A. Anderson,
City Attorney; Stephen M. Telfer, City Administrator;
Doris Hartig, 'City Recorder. s
Absent: Councilman W. ,Del`Ball; Keith C. Thompson,
Director of Public Works.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. MINUTES FOR APPROVAL, October 14, 1968.
(a) Approved as submitted,
4. COMPREHENSIVE LIABILITY POLICY RENEWAL
(a) City Administrator recommended comprehensive liability
policy be awarded to Marsh, McLennan --D.K. MacDonald &
Co. Inc. for a $500,000, single limit, all risk policy.
Annual premium for 3 year policy $2,549. Administrator
further stated he had received a letter from Dan
Bertuleit of I.A.A. offering an addendum to his bid in
that he now could offer the errors and omission coverage
for additional $95.00 premium. The original bid was
for $300,000. single limit, all risk policy, for a
premium of $2,425. making total premium $2,520.
(b) Motion by Councilman Moore to authorize City Administrator
to award bid for comprehensive liability insurance, 'total
premium $2,549, for one year premium on a three year
policy. Motion seconded by Councilman Knauss.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
5.` BUREAU OF OUTDOOR & RECREATION FUNDS
(a) City Administrator requested matter be set-over until
such time as an additional contract has been made with
Washington'County. Council, 'City Administrator and City
Attorney discussed at length present status of 'Cook Park
access road. Administrator stated County is considering
S.W. 92nd and S.W. 94th Ave. and is in the process of
obtaining new roadviewers reports. Public Hearing on
road will be held by Washington County Commissioners,
November 4, 1968. ' Council `expressed'dissatisfaction over
delay in development of'roadway and possible loss of
B.O.R. Funds.
(b) Motion by Councilman Knauss authorizing Mayor and City
Administrator to'draft a statement directed to Washington
County Commissioners requesting positive action be
taken with 'respect to obtaining entrance to Cook Park.
Motion seconded by Councilman Moore.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
6.` ORDINANCE No. 68-74 AN'ORDINANCE SETTING HEARING WITH RESPECT TO
PETITION':PROPOSING`ANNEXATION OF'LANDS;TO THE
CITY OF TIGARD;IN SECTION 3, T2S, ;R1W,
WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON,
COMMONLY rDESIGNATED lTHE 11115th AVENUE ANNEXATION".
DIRECTING THE GIVING-OF:NOTICE, `AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY.
Page 1
( :) Setting of Public He;3ring November- 25, 1968, 8:00 B.M.
(b) Motion to sct public hear-incl: Councilman Bergmann,
seconded by Counciin.ui Moore.
.pproved by unanimous vote of Council present.
7, ORDINANCE No.. 68-75 AN ORDINANCE SETTING HEARING WITH RESPECT TO
PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF THE LANDS OF STANDARD
INVESTMENT CO, in Sec:. 35, TIS, R1W, W.M.
WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON AND DIRECTING GIVING
OF NOTICE THEREOF,
(a) Setting of Public Hearing November 25, 1968, 8:00 P.M.
(b) Motion to set public hearinq: Councilman Moore, seconded
by Councilman Knauss.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
B. APPROVE 1969 LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION
-(:a) City Administrator reported police department had
approved license renewal applications for:
Girod's Super Market
Fred Meyer Inc_
Lone O.:ik Restaurant
(b) Motion to approve applications: Councilman Bergmann,
seconded by Councilman Moore:
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
9,. ORDINANCE No. 68--.-- AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A ZONE CHANGE WITH
RESPECT TO THE LANDS OF ROBERT T. COOPER
DEVELOPMENT CO. IN Seca 35, TIS, R1W.
W.M, TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON,
Present Zone-R-7 (Residential) ;; Reauested
Zone a --2 (Multiple dwelling) Application
denied by Planningand 'Zoning,'Commission
(a) Public Hearing 8:00' P,M.
Those who testifiea against zone change:.
Jerome Petrin, 11570"o.w. 'Grt,,...,ury ,..,dd:
Leonard Dicker, 11420 S.W, 94th
Gerald Swank, 9445 S.W. Center Street
Those who testified for zone change:
John Fredricks Realtor, representing Mr. Cooper
Public Hearing Closed
(b)', Motion to adopt: Councilman Bergmann, seconded by
"Councilman Moore.
Motion to adopt ordinance failed to pass;by unanimous
vote of Council present.
10. ORDINANCE No. 68-76 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING`THE MAYOR AND CITY
RECORDER TO EXECUTE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY 'A
CERTAIN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE`CITY OF 'TIGARD
AND PARMERS`UNDERWRITERS ASSOCIATION`AND
^EORGIA PACIFICCORPORATION_ CONCERNING
S,idER SERVICE.
(a) D:otiov to .:dopa: Councilman' Bergmann, seconded by
citi,ra�T.m n Knausla.
agP 2
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
11. SALE OF SURPLUS EQUIPMENT - Sewage Treatment Plant, Multilith
Machine and APECO copy machine
(a) City Administrator stated City did not receive any bids
on surplus equipment. He requested Council authorize
City staff to negotiate the disposition of equipment
on whatever basis they can secure beat price.`
(b) Motion by,Councilman Bergmann to authorize City
Administrator to negotiate for the disposal of equipment.
Seconded by Councilman Moore.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
OTHER BUSINESS
A. City Attorney requested guidance from Council regarding Davidson
zone change litigation. Council discussed matter after meeting in
closed session.
B. City Administrator stated letter had been received from BENOL
Corp. requesting credit on expired building permit 67-51 for
Plaza Gardens Apts. taken out in March of 1967. New plans have now
been re-submitted and Adn;ini.strator requested Council authorization
to retain plan checking fee of $326.25 paid in March 1967 and
credit building permit feea'of $553.50 to new plans recently submitted.
Council discussed setting a policy to retain plan checking fee and
refund building permit fee in the form of credit only.
Motion by Councilman Moore establishing a policy that building permit
fees shall be refunded in the form of credit and plan checking
fees shall be retained by City for services performed. 'Motion
seconded by Councilman Bergmann:
Motion passed by a vote of 3 t 1. - Councilman Knauss voting "NAY
a. Meeting adjourned 8:40 P.M.
Ci Recorde /
ATTEST:
Mayor
•Com'
i
til:
October 14, 1968
MEMO TO: City Council
FROM: City Administrator
RE: Bids on Comprehensive Liability Insurance
The City has received three bids on Comprehensive Liability Insurance
as per the bid specifications drawn by Fred. Anderson. Fred, and I
have had the opportunity to sit down together and review the bids,
weighing in each case the coverage offered with respect to the
specifications and the premium.
After study of the three bids (see attached summary sheet) , I make
the following recommendations:
1. The City Council award the contract for Comprehensive
General,Liability Insurance coverage to Marsh 6 McLennan
D. K. MacDonald and Company, Inc, on the basis of their
premium of $2,549.00 for $500,000.00 single limit - all
risks coverage. As you can see from the attached summary,
the premium cost difference between Option "C" $300,000.00
single limit - all risks coverage versus Option "D" $500,000.00
single_limit - all risks coverage, is only $161.00. I am
recommending the $500,000.00 policy at the $161.00 premium
-
increase in lieu of the $1,000,000,00 umbrella coverage with
as additional premium cost of $3,113.00.
k
2. The City Council and staff should continue to weigh the
liability risks encountered in a rapidly growing governmental
agency with the premium costs of a supplementary,umbrella
policy such as offered under_Option "G" of the specifications.
As you are aware, Chapter 627 Oregon Laws of 1957 limits the
= liability of any public body on claims arising,under the act
from any single occurrence to'$300,000.00. The statute, however,
does not limit the liability of officers,,agents, and;'employees
of governmental units. In other words, a serious occurance
caused by:the negligence of an employee of the:City, acting
within the scope of his employment,' could':give rise to a
judgment or claim greater than the City's G;$300,000.00 'liability
limit. This would leave the employee with the possibility of
having to privately settle any share of the judgment in excess
' of the $300,000.00 limit. At the present°time"the scope of
the City's operations and its number of employees does not
present 'enough opportunity or risk to warrant the expenditure
of $3,113.00 for an 'additional $1,000,000.00 worth of umbrella
protection. It is for this reason that I'have elected to
recommend that you purchase the $500,000.00 policy, thereby,
obtaining an additional $200,000.00 coverage over the statutory
limit for the additional $161.00 premium.
3. Should you elect: to award the bid to the Marsh & McLennan
firm, our existing comprehensive liability coverage would be
cancelled and any premium paid, refunded, on a prorated basis.
I would then recommend that you direct metoreview all other
), City insurance policies with an aim towards consolidation.
page,2
Policies that cannot be consolidated should perhaps be
altered to'provide_for uniform expiration dates, thereby,
providing easier analysis and budgeting.
4
i
z
z Baa O o o
zz 0 0 0
o +a '
W a W m v r+
a 0 q>+ r ut 0 C4
1
U
w ro
> x 4
E
A4: q v>•
o.
rn
�n w
o � N
W
U
z
v o
W N o
z,
H 2 a c
H fA q>+
H H R"i M O O O. O O O O 014
O 5-4
N
o c r` v o E q 41
!T m N v N M Ch •A N.11
m O 14 N -T O r4 q Y F
a
u u o uw 41 41 4J 4J 4J
q q q q
O Sa E 1.1 '.O H E:N EE E E a1 11 a)'
N :3 ,•H a .:U1 A •.{.a •11:N N •'/ N -.•.I N.i .ei.N ri
14U ,_la u axax ax axn ax�a
al U .i,U m U -4 U '. N Er, N N•,4 to.,•r
M o U 0 a o U o (D-14 (1)-1 W-4v•-r 41 W-11 41
.i 9 .-r C. : -f Z �4 a' U .-1 1z U
u u u �i u U u u C,-1 C,-/ C,-1 C H b r 1.4 a
•.•1 `:ro ro 'ro re •.i :ro to It ro --4 q -.-1 4 •.1,4 ••1,-r W •'r.•r ai:
Q a) w al N .n a) a W:01 rA 4 W 4 m 4 m Q b m a.0
E E
0 'oo ro'0 O ;oo oo 0 0 o o 0 0
4.) -00 0o 4J 00 ^0o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0
A -00 0 o a "0 o .....Oo o o :.o <."O o 0 :.o'.
1011o
-rA O O u1:O 'O O OO O O O O 7 O
".: bl V7 0 'N O � .,00 u'1 0 O O ':O O i O O
H
:.H = M 'M ,4 "H 1l1 ':N M 10. V) Cl l/1 V} O ri
!n a � � V)- m
O 14
N U U
H q G
E-1 H v H Q H H q
as
co
Uj
z
H A
v �
o �—
U
o�
4Z vi
u Cl
o %I
.a �i,
x .
o ~
w S
P4
w 0 QNI
Y1
U
w
0
z
0
w
a
o
U
NA
44
C$ H
a)
as
W N
Q) a)
O > C N m p*' 4Jro
H .1 O O.4J i.) -.
i H m 4J0 (d ",ro b 3 aG) 'A A. ;M-4 > o'
i) O u) O
f a O 4 C w M N-4i >,a o 14 •moi
ra a) row yv,o �
Ero oN a3 ro ° z >,k 4J-.l vii G
O w o °:4J m N: > U a 11 1-4w N ro b .' ayi rE N q-`>
w w m ° , � . vw > w aH yti MGo
44 .
0 w >1 a .Hoarrow o
{ ul rd u) aA° �Co a a0ao
zaa •oM44 Hvc m•.4 Id a3
v w brooi r °u v.
Wx�7 a :a $4mH m °a °ua�i•.�i c> u° a ro a oc carob.
t� U H w@ a W a 3 o7 Sa'•I 'Fi a) a u D+ Q Cq ro a) D o w
P4 H
z a ;w roA U b N w U
0 W... y CP WM b SA
y
mill liiii�m�ilim
w
z
�
Q z °
a
�o
o �
a
VI
N.
N N
W CD
o•.n ro .
> : $0 �4,N
v ar•�, ai u
.H:yJ O 44 - 019
a'w10 O.d W H W
ro0 ae`ti oy 5 O
-40 1 731 > a O H
N Zal Z70 3 U �H
v U C v h H�
� y Q
October 23, 1968
TO: Tigard City Council
FROM: Tigard Planning & Zoning Commission
( SUBJECT: Zone Change Request: Cooper Development Company
A request for a change from R-7 to A-2 on a 4.88
acre site located at 11585-11595 SW Greenburg Road
and'11785-11830 SW 95th Street (Map '#l$1 35DC,
Tax Lots 2900, 2800, 3900, 4000)
Planning and Zoning Action:
The Commission and the City Staffrecommenddenial of this
application at this time. There is great City Staff concern about
the inadequacy of Greenburg Road and of the utilities serving the
area. The City Engineer has pointed out problems with the existing
sewer service which is now used to capacity and which has particular
problems'during' the rainy season. The fire department has also
expressed concern about the already reduced water pressure in the
area and its effect "on city-wide fire ratings.
Reconsideration of the zone change should be made when the
road and utility problems have been alleviated. With access shown
on 95th and on Greenburg the property is felt to be more suitable
for higher density development, than under the previous application
(denied January, 1968) when access was only on Greenburg Road. It
is also in an area which is forecasted for higher density. Granting
the zone change,now however would only aggravate existing problems
and;burden rthe entire neighborhood.
(The A-2 zone will permit a maximum of 160 units on a 4.8 acre
piece of property)
i
�2tY Tour Ooke5
R '► i R
tt
-0 ��
9-7 I .
f`
a
II R-7
N
It
.T 2500
o R.7
-1
- -
21-
90
oSACID
,oa
A-2
C9°l un:%under
�..' I m Constiruation�
; ) x
4�0p
yf00 4400
An application by the 'Coopei'
Development Co. for a zone change
from the R-7 (single sfamily residential
to the A-2 (Multi family residential)
of the properties located at 11565 and
11595 SW 'Greenburg Road and,11785 and
11830 SW`95th'Street.