City Council Packet - 02/11/1963 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
_
MINUTES QT rCETINC; rpYnnA111 li lc
Present.: Mayor E. A. Wooc!arC; _ Counc;-1, _._ _
r, J. Cooper; F. II. Parcmartn; IlI. ,,. t,ohnsont n ne
Attorney F. A. Anderson.
Dieetincr called to ord.ei a✓ "flayor`�,7oodard at 7:30 P. 'nT
Mayor Woodard requeste'. reac'inq of the b;i.nutes o{ the t e. Lino
of rebruarr 1st. The x7inutcs were en react and upon call`
for corrections or ohject.�_ons, none 7 ei-nc* n�fern ?, rtavnr
Woodard -eclared the i•'.inutes to stangy aph.rovee?. as ream
Mavor Woodard offered. Mr. 'Sellihen, front the au; ;cnce, an
opportunit:,
to --,Deal: to the Council ^llik.^_n is scllinc
a line of'chemicals for use in sewage plants. r qvor <;ocdar
a�tvised Council would consider the ratter and porhar_c set a
time dor him tc -
deca- nts of t-er.
Mayor Woodard: We will now take un the question of the ';one
change on Mr. Keesli.n5_' property, on .cite ocher side of the
viaduct.- At this time we will call upon anyone :in the
audience who would lil:e to talk either for or-ac*ainst this
`:;one chance. _
k.r.-Vichael Stan was concerned about the bovnc_._v o_
f
a
r the
proporty involved in this ;one change an(.. what type huiluling
was proposed; whether Lr. P.eeslinc iiau stated. an,lthincr in this
respect.
Councilman Hanneman: Yes_ he has 'stated what lie proposes to
buil there. I mi.g tt ash 2'_r.f/ o
would correct-me if
my information is not,up-to-tate. The proposal is o:- 12
units, apartment units, constructed over a peri oel of :two to `.
three years, not all. 12 units building- at once and or courso
we'would not mean to in.-_, that lie:woulc,"+_.,. e 'tree E,ears to
build 4. units, 't would be the normal sequence of construction.
That is the information I Have on the number of units. The
area is plenty larcTe for that mama units, ;or siffi cient off-
street parking and the owner:has statec7,. also I that ng- hopes
to:put in a Swimming pool for the aI'lrtriG:ts. Further, that
they will be two story in construction and that; I may have
misunderstood on this score, but I"believe he stated %te would
develop the street frc nio property to Greenburg Road, that
is, 91st, which of course -mould be necessary to provioc access
to the apartments.
In this respect, ;we have at the present -J--me, a 20 foot
right-o£-way from Greenbura'to Lincoln Avenue. If this then
were developed that would mean that all hist. a few feet of the
street would be'built as a uY ble street 'anr_'<. surfaced. That
would mean also :that it would have to he widened to 4-0 feet.`
I would like to point out there is this aevantage to the City,
that we would be getting the street and tile property owner.
2-11-03 Page 1.
would have vo dec zcr,_e to :J.7n_ City, c',eed '_o the City, 20 foot
frontage in order to mal,_e the street. that ..._ +
Mr. 1) E. Franzel also -no:,e about the wi;lth of the street an,,
thought Council should Consider wore t tan 20 l.e:?t7, . 'o ..tl i.CR
Mayor 11oo6aril ans*,ier.ed; there is 20 feet at the present anc7.
there is supposed to be 20 feet r,ore".
Councilman Hanneman: What : i
_r. Franzel means is that rrovsion
3 � made for 50 fee'c anal this is a proposal for a 10 `oot
riq_ht-of-wav, not 50 foot.
mo,. rranzel : There was provrci.on co allo%, for 30 fee*_.
Cnunc'i l,,,an Isannerian: well, this problem would- exist- on any
such street. as 91st and there areacreat many e tiem.; we
could not physically use a 50 foot richt-of-way. The houses
could not deduct 30 sleet; they would 'have to cut oik portions
of their structures or have the street richt to tho front door
,which would not enhance the property. This was the case on
Lincoln Avenue; at best it would cut across front door-steps
and,-not allow any front area, -I am sure this applicant could
not deed, 'even if the rest could.
Mrs. Earl B. Johnston, of 11775 S. 17. 91st, adc7resse(7 Council
saying she felt she should have been notified of this heari.ny
tonight, as she is on the same side of the street although
she did not receive notification. She stated she was most
definitely against any raultiple dwellings"and that further if
any of her propertz, were to be taken .she ;7oulcl not have anv
front yard left.
Councilman Hanneman: I was under the impression that the
property owners spoke for the full loncth r of the street when
they said to me that they would all agree`to dedicate cate 20 feet
to the City.
Councilman 11anneman asked Mrs. Johnston if she owned the
property and she replied they were b ,,,,ing, it.
Councilman Hanneman: Do you have an- information on the part
to Greenburg Road?
Attorney Anderson: We must know; we can't take any chances
on who are the owners. ,
Councilman Hanneman: They are down somedistance from
Greenbury, this lot here is the second from Greenbury.
Attorney Anderson: We have to obtain sicnatures of anyone
having any interest whether by mortoac-e, deed or contracts.
Councilman Hanneman: Is Dir. Henry, here this evening? (Nr.
Henry answered from the audience.) on this 2.0 foot- frontage,
-' 14r. Henry, from the Keesling `-place .to Greenburg Road, are you
2-11-63 - Page 2.
the owne_ that pror0rt, all
the a,•::
i"r Heni:, Yes.
IsCOUII lzan tannezz n , a --
'to ._
a _ t! i a _;n r ,. t n c z }r for Lno ,: ol.osai
'-'r, enr,/: s 1 >ac ..c, last nirizt; r q
an, r,'t ,a.n1. to to?,
c�clor,..ent Jo.dr.
Council an Itannci an: c un
ciL Zn u:, zzi Jn � _11 "have
this also; however, w can i c,
z,
aS=COY n,- l-J t�'1(` co, rp ohlcie:lce. I
over to hi i these ag,.ee.tents wArn -1,a,
Keesline 111.a _:r. cc, o _ Li.ra� Uci _Tou z
20 o)L ce .gat on to the City, in
turn the city woulc i„-:provc• t-zzc Lrcc+
gay ttzat'we would G: dcu se, T ?,c, not
pace anc, Curl the re-et, we <.aill
as c�de are financially able to •1 -rove it, -z1r�e�e z
proposal l.:ado t0 0U _'Or a This Wu til(?
Z le. I want to make Sure Lhat is is
physically possible to Co ,o ani it appears that _t '"
I-=r.. Henry: r don't want to do
t.zat at the c,_
neighbors: pense o f .,z
Y
Attorney Anderson: 1 acree 'You have to have a roac' into an
apartment welling to accommouate the traffic. Mr. lenry,
you own the 20 feet additional area teat
the street? ;_s to be annexed to
Mr'. Henry: Yes,:
You own the area to the present street, youcankeep your
neighbors from coming or going; is it a right-of-wayor t
you have title to: it: Does each lot thatabutts yours have a
right to use it?
Mr. Henry: Yes.
Attorney Anderson: To clari£j, we have 20 feet on the ,east
side of the street w:zicl-i is dedicated; we have in 'Nr. Keeslina's
property on the west side or maybe on the leer rs/
ftan" side, another
20 feet which abutts and ends Par. Keesling's land and runs
to Greenburg. w 7�t 20 feet intervenes between each lot that
lies betweenI ---
and. Grecnburg; frr. I.eesling sayshe
owns and he says further that each lot has an easement,to use
it for a road; that's all I go by. Tile answer is to §et a
title report on the 20 feet and find out who owns it. it
could be conceivably possible that it is already dedicated by
instrument for road purposes.
Councilman Hanneman: I would suggest, Mister Dlayor, that the
city's approval of alone change would be entirelydependent
on the right-of-way and it could not be approved until a'
right-o£-way was confirmed.
Councilman Johnson: I think, whether we like it or not, we
2-11-63 - page 3.
are c-oi.nc; to have to rlan for si,'r-walkF. 1 am Buie 1. ice,t t fere
will be people in ,_i.i.s ica,l tir1._ r7vvcllincc ;:hat will lave to -rave
so:net.iinc to 'kal;c on hosice e crr
st;l,l thin]- wo arc! r-_"...c: to .. -n
o have r id:c ;il -s hu 7,,re we coins to zr -;rove a
or are d e c,u nc to ta1., a1 .
Counciliran Johnson: I thin'!: we .h zA6., in to "t,t,, re, in -
-iinc., like this, plan enough room =or a cnr.> .-Ind a _ida4.al;:.
I thi nl: ;Here shoul0 '..,e siuewalRs on both s .< es.
Councilman Tanneman: Por the nurrlose o-- tl,,is nearing I wo!A,
rsuccest that the _arinq be re cnec'uleCt at a later -?ate, until
such time as sufficient richt-o:=-w.av can nrovic,e i Por the
pror,erty, to justify a streci.
Mayor Woos:ard: Are there an.y comments from am� o!-.ier. Councilman?
CouncilmanCool er.: I think wo woulr;" be wrong in .?o.i.nc anvthinc
until we have all the Facts. T t:i.n:_ it shquld. be rost.roned
but it shon.lc2 be taken care of as soon as possible.
Councilman Hannen.an: I woulJ 1..':.e to make t'hi.s stater+crit; it
was,the City's assumption that these plans had been foa:nulated
as to right-of-way into t1ae property, obvi.ousl,,, no attempt. was
made to provide the right-of-way.
Mayor Woodard: I -vent over to Keesling's w t'n you three or
four weeks ago. It was my understanfincr the ric_n -of-way was
decides: and we could go ahead with it, accorcUnc to the
tonight, we are not sure.
Councilman Hanneman: We certainly are not.
R ayor Woodard: I would also state, that we should go ahea,,i
and see if Lhe riabL-of.-way can be approveO before we can act
on this lone change for Pr. Keesli.ng; after t•iat:is none we will,
notify these people again, scheduling another hearing at a
later date.
Councilman Cooper: 1f.,gg..t that this lacy's name be put. on
the list. (Theiname�-o of krs. Earl B „ohnston of 11.775:S. S'T.
91st, was added to the list.)
Councilman lianneman: I think the notification of the heari_nc,
should be published; it should be carried as advertising i.n
the paper, "i.nstead of local news. I would suggest for the
Tigard Times' information, they should call the City Office
for more information.
Councilman '7ohnson: Could we also ;put _n the legal description
and also give the address of the propert,�c
Mayor Woodard: We will ,.o ahead now and aet the right-of-way
:for 91st Street straightened out and'- ,:hen we will again call`for
2-11-63 - Pace 4.
a hearing* on this n.l notify-you in'nlent, of tire. "7C ci11`
dispense with _urther trcarinc on this m�,tte.r enrich`, as ,..,e
have insufficient in,ornation ^or. au,,
Councilman Johnson, have �,,ou awithinq to o,fear
Counc'lman Johnson; I "sr.i two th i nes, one or' ;vizi c:r I no,.,,
withdraw. T'ie o`I e_ i_;,, we are involve-1 in'a private street
that we shoul-' spent iaoney on, S:cl_e.nzie. T iat toes' fro-
to
ro-to Grant. That's z Private street, and we have a complaint
from St-. Anthonv's Church. I think if i oy were to reams' thein;
deed., I think they woulcl fin,, they own that street. Th, •
>_s a
ather i,i:_i ul citing cb 7o, I n!Z want' to cet tnto pro rle„-
with St. Anthon;-'s Chu,:rh; on she other han•' I C link, -i in
reason the lent_th of tiros_ it has been upe,, as a ',reef ic'rt
mate it public property, ,.lt:houcjh it was never eedec• to ''he'
Citi ;or County. I an he.sitant to use public func's to'repai.r
that Street. The other one I hat. was 95th from Commercial to
Greenburg; that is full of chuck-holes I 'snow tine,.n is a
creat deal of traffic. The bi.c_' we got was .550.')0 for 4:axine
care of that; I would move 'hat we allow tliat expense. 1--lotion
seconded by Councilman Hanneman.
Mayor Woodard: It has been properly mocec' ane seconOec that
we allow an e,cpense of $50.00 to repair 95th from Greenburcr to
Commercial.
Upon call for vote, the motion was unanimously• approvec by Council.
Councilman Johnson read a letter from Dir. , . T. Serec.a of
9280 S. W. Electric Street, Tigard requesting a "dead-encs
sign be placed on S. W. Electric. Councilman Johnson suggested
the placing of a ''dead-end" sign on this street and after some
discussion itrasagreed t al-. one of thetwo remaining
"dean-end" signs in stock and place one on S. W. Electric St.
Followino this there was cons i_derable review and discussion
about the condition and responsibility for repairing' McKenzie
Street, which review was entered into by I-'ayor Woodard, <Counci.l-
men Johnson and Hanneman. The discussion centered around the
fact 'that Councilman Johnson felt that if:Council repaired the
street it might mean paving it eventually and the possibilit.y
of demands ;by residents on other streets, :in like condition,
to have repairs instituted. Councilman uanneman stated that
his suggestion made to private property owners on a deicated
street, to pay fifty percent of the cost of improving the
street, he thoucaht was a bargain to the public, but the;public =
wouldn't go 'along with it and there was only one person, D'r.
Phillips, that cooperated.
Councilman Jchnson fell: that the letter having been civen to
him by the Mayor, as no doubt a' legitimate job but that
basically Mr. Cagle and the Church owned the street.
Attorney Anderson suggested Council should go about Glatt:int
that street legitimatized; the first thing to do is survey
_
it, determine where it is, get'a line on each side, ?sake up
2-11-63 - Page 5. `'
ease ani., cio ,.,;n. t ll; R' 1...._.� a .' a.s;. c,V..7,..,,' .�_„ ;._n
icn _ tc o pn.,lic or i_ci'f.-e C'it l.i,n .e C_tv .munch
can accept the pti:oot in 1n�, ccn(Ut on. T ;:n; _ - .i.s u.lu s
to ac ort t"J.13 rrohle"hA c•I Ien Ou .)tre o .mer.
;t. An:hon-'45 is * .vax`e >> '. an nn
t rh l o.. .n!") t .'
IMC soo .it2rn t an-,.' cr ceCtl �_OJ E:. Jl. .i +.0 c'e, ..la'`.
strep". iI-I'Lo a Cit tr
C,ovnC l...an On.insfn: T can i''.. ^Al'i•C•>C-`-'., c?1 d17.
J:Ticoli, Lr. Cac-1 ;.. i.s,_. I I co at t1aj s, _ ,..i.. to
aY,e 1t to 1, :-,1e v s i,c 11 1 o UiL Cl.a .
proper" anc', must we .ascr_ ,1-.00 :,n.
other const a ti ons, i_
t -Or
rxt
Attornev Ancj-ez-son, -ou are, ra a.J.J r _: li',, an- con -rapt to
be Orvalue riils,t- "lave cons ir',era t i ons. T.ae polls1 ,]ati.on can
' e Until -,ou hate
be r;•,onet,• r o,al.se or- >.ot Esc .ritn t,l,� ,.
i.t si ned, r;-eu have (--,onsicerati_on in e.i,ectunc• 1'oi Jon"4
have to o ice thee, a p oll ar and r:necan' _ „r o: it, .-V-lo
say ,in hanc is«irQ". it eel' not ,-)e E,. cu;a clan. c"ee.,
should be a "bargain an' `salo" Cee':.
Mayor woo-arra: You., Councilman Jo=lnson, ;can c_re aaea 1 ,anr�, do
that
Councilman Johnson: I will ao aiieaC, an(f, t.o t11at ane- See
we can get it settled.
Councilman Berccmann: 'lL,ul J we have- to take anv street in
concl.ition, or can vnu s,a,_, nrr,n_ rent r n cot our co'1?_ ._.:..r.,
first'
Councilman Hanneman: The ozistinr brivate roa' 'ways, at the:
time of Incorporation, 'they were to be r.ra3uallv:accepted, one
by one, on the basis of financial ability to do sorothinq with
them; how many do we have to maintain that we have accepter',
Attorney Anderson: You mi-a-ht even approach it this warn, if
you ;put it up to the people; we will moi- this street or do
certain things if you will bear 15, 20 or 25 percent of the
cost of this street. You get a policv, if you put UP so much
money, we rill take it over and co what we can with it.
Councilman Johnson: I'would like to make a motion that, as
a policy of this City Council, that we accept- existinc private
streets intheircondition as o, now, provided the interested
parties give us a deed to those streets. N.otionseconded by
Councilman Borgmann.
Attorney Anderson: One comment; ownership' sometimes has
something to ao with it. de have no responsibility. If
r` someone hurts themselves on it if it were the City's, the
4 City-would be open to suit under the ;Charter up to $500:00;
2-11-63 - page G.
that is one of the most prevalent ,hint s. I c"111' sucgest
you woulrl not want to accept them carte blanche until =;ou
determined they were in safe conciti.on.
Councilman IIannernan. 0ou1' i.t not ?ae !.c ce;. `o accept '.-.i e
item by item as we procaed, ,:eKaz,i_e r.irsi..
Attorney AnO-erson: I won er if it z:;ic iL no' „e -- am
then you determine what streets we are talkinc about, we ;'ollow
' you take sue to carry out
f in this catecory, .hen one U�,' one yo
your
policy.
Councilman Johnson: ply motion has a lo'- of roles in it, if
someone would like to close those ,poles Jt ai.1.l be aprrec ate—
Icant the,policy that is o?_ay with the Council, so that I can
proceed and get these streets UI 1at are privately own C, under
our control so that we:can pave them or oravfe Thera as it con es
along; we will have the right for crater and sewer, tine sewer
lines can be put i_n without having a lot of p-robl<e..Vs' and going
through a big "wrastle".
Mayor.-Woodard: If we go ahead with your motion as stated,
then before we accept that particular street, we would. have to
grade it before we write it up as our street, so it will be
safe when we take it over.
Councilman Hanneman: It seems dangerous, to ire, to adopt a
policy',by motion of. this Council, that we will accept private_
streets An_v one can come to us and say, we have a private
street.
Councilman Johnson: we will adopt private streets as of
now,
in ti:e future we c,on until ..h`„> u e brought up to our
specifications. This street is 30 years ol,l and'son•.e of them
are around 10 to 15 =gears old.
Councilman Hanneman: I-am talking about the private roa days
in this City, which is sufficient; every foot of those two miles
can demand work from the City unless we have an "i_ron-clad"
policy set up and not a policy to accept: all the streets as or
now, which is 2 miles of street, I cannot see that. We s7hould
clarify it according to our feasible or planned program of
adoption; the policy to adopt the private streets based on the
City' plan of adoption.
Attornev Anderson: ' Would vou'want to state this in terms
of a program that ,you undertake= so: this could be an e.rpression
of purpose without committing you definitely so no one could
point',a finger at'vou. There could be ways lightly traveled.
I think we can all understand we are afterµan expression of
purpose; as these streets seem to have a public justification, `
you will undertake them on a planned purpose.
Councilman Johnson' suggested that if Councilman Bergmann would
f withdraw his second to the motion, he would:withdraw his motion.
2-11-63 - Page 7.
This was accoaaplis1c.C' ;w Cr,uncilT,an Docrag nn with:?rae*inc his
sccenc' to the motion an(' Counci.lt'..an ---)Ianson with(?r-awi.nc his
,aotibn.
ayor Woodard:: I will as;: our Ai.C:oiney ':o r, to i n oic_,
that will:f!.t...in as c;•e t.nule want at.
Councilria n Johnson: I 'cavo only thin one nine, if it !.s
all .a.ctnt t.ztn Lie Council, I will j,ut up a "dead-enc, s>_r.n
on S. W. Electric. 110-yor ,ioo _a.r staff_. ,; i- was okay-anc
Council agreed.
Councilman Hanneman: If �,ou will recall, we had directed.
our Attorney to write an Ore n nce for our r ild nc n: ;oninc
Codes; tnas would ue a roucl>: raft and 7.r it a.G available
;t
would be wonderful. (At tilis time At.tornep Anderson rresente7.
each Councilman with a rougi-A draft ct two Orci:inances) .
Several:thinc;s have core up that certainly need I2ulalic
airing. We want to obtain I rinted cor es of the lonino Corte
prior to enactment of the law and'I have'contacted the County
in consideration of getting this worn, done and have talked to
our Clerk anCt I believe we will arrive at sore solutionthere.
As far as the,Building Code, as mentioned ,previously,
we would get copies from the Build.inc• Official's Conference.
This of course was based upon payinc a memliershir fee to the
Conference of $40.00 per year. I will now recommend that
we do not join that Conference 'lecause we are to+mall a City
to ever hope to have the resources to send a representative
to the Conference meetincs and keep,rwith the status of that.
I`have Pound out also twat we can adopt this code, we
can write our own amendiients"to the code, which of course
would be `costly if we fid because we would no longer have the
code in it's entirety and we would see more complaints than
the.,several that the contractors had about the 'building permit
fees and I will suggest, however, that we;will possibly ,ust
continue the County fee basis until we fi.nc' out what our costs
should be 'anC' I believe the Duilding Department should operate
on 'a "pay-,as-you-go" basis. This will depend upon t_ha tire
lapse between now and the enctrent of the law. `
In the mcantire, I expect to get a list of the fees
charged by various Cities in the State o,_" Oregon as a basis
to go by. I would imagine that or Ordinance then would
imply define those fees, ,,s
s being an e:.ceution to the Code.
in these, the majority of Cities in Oregon do not appear
to use the fees found in the code. Also, to`'mai,e the
Building Code wore-able we must :lave competent inspectors
and several possi_biliL-ifs are beim,. consi6ere'. I` we cannot
determine "those fees, then I would 'suggest we continue with
the County fee basis.
Councilman Johnson: ,lave you explored `•:he poss._.;ilit,r of
using the County inspectors on a fee basis.`
councilman Hanneman: Yes sir.
2-11-03 -:Page 2.
mom
COlInc r lro-zn n1in o ,
eeo _*• m nn
-e.enc .in 7_ �c . .on �n c, .. t, 1� ;-nc, ,
o clear LIT',. I c nul 1.4.,;e co l e Cl c
'ere
the ru'ber s z3rl 5 '. (.tz lx s n lrn r
03 .
b-on o>de,en ,_nee
hat boe-n ei4 an _urne , :o cost of Cnun
au la_ ii1 u�ret" n,z h.^ 1" ai
-
Tr n n _l, n'
of the Cil
the Count, has o n_e; t, 30. : , <
e % u...J
agog ?: owei.
C'nunc 1 'a"1 'Sr .r.. y
Copt._. O_, taleC_, '.e t,.le C�.t
Counc4lna'1 iannoe_n.s.G "011 —)O e. c;J-1 '.
_1 1e CL
volu3�r_s one an-! i.lzre`, ,'li.,, erics,
ttornay An rsor q
a t I P o was,, z i S ,S i ile
la:, andprovu:.e l zatY a Cit,, , Ordinance a�' _
a c. L_ as it
lata 1r�r pthxi eaeJ Stan .Zrc: Ccc _ chit
n the C.i.t, 0. ;-ic, e L s_ haveon _ lr,^
be o ! 3 ac'oT _e le< _h:ee
copias.
Counci..lran I-Iannernan: Z. ,u. 31a,s ` one o 1 ,,
�. �� o_L ey ��o
'need the ottlers. ..7e :vi_11
Pcr the Counc_1's cons is pati ont1l
a r
Code rlculr_z we n _ a='ro
used laih,�? ,r_ tha Cc--'c tsc .l s sinc is ,s belnc
T i•.:oul l k to ma":e a motion that our
`_03 tat he
instructed to draw M
up an O cl;nanee a opl.in� lae ate lcctr
Code. Inasmuch cal
s "'r are us nr Stat inspectors on e ,a•
of she State code, s's
ta,..: rer•ta on
'h re-write it: I would chin i't Would . in or ^_r to recon
c
the motion,
h:atign secon1 r - Councilman Johnson.
Upon call for vote the motion was unanimouslzr approvecl
by Council.
Councilman Hanneman: I would like to as': the city 1;ecorc'er
to return Mr. Elton C. Phillips' check on the Lincoln:Avenue`
Improvemen
proposal. t Fund, since there was no other response to the
One thing more, it, isn't;in my department but
a complaint this week on the p I n Lomita p n� baslcetbail stop erected on Lomita
Terrace; I'do not nave the address of the 'aouse,r;it is up at
the end of;Lomita Terrace and the basketball stop i, erected:
and unfortunately faces;the front window of another house. T'
could not specifically tie it down to the Provisions of the
Nuisance Ordinance.
The complaint was not presented in writing
as I requested, so I can't be specific about referrinc it to
someone else but to be aware of it,if it is submitted in wra_tinrr.
Mayor Woodard: Until it is in writing we should not act upon it,
2-11-63 - Page 9.`
Councilman Cooper: The Reco_ er has letter from the 'lctinc
Director of the Census, I would li.l.e nir;, to rea., (1^ e
:.t.
T;ecorder '_-hen read. the letter.)
I Would like to move that t.ne Recor(.'cr })e ,nstructe•' tc
arrange: for and proceec w.th the census enum=_ration rn�l we
proceea with it in.m01iiateiy, nayi.na t'ae em.—_,ator
$0.10 a
head and th-is to be conplei-en a,i ce to he state �_,
Oregon by the 2.0th of ,Tune of this year. .`3tion seconCcc' bv.
Councilman IIanne..an and upon call for vote was unani.rcously
approved by Council,
Councilman Le g' nn gave a report OF n_:s visit ,o the State
Fire Marshall's office, tnL information he 1 acl cathlera, with
respect to no map+vailable showinc ire _iyc:+.rantS and also
advised on Business Licenses Le had contacted various Cities
and was setting up a meeting with representatives of the Chamber
of Commerce to hear their 'views and complaints on this and
reported he has just about com letecl tybino the list of business
houses in the City. -
Councilman. Cooper "I certain1v don't think it shoul-d be
submitted to the Chainber of Commerce to let the,, write t oi.r
own t._cket.
Councilman Bergmann: It was to cet their i.c:eas on J_t anj
then I will come back and continue d.rawinq up the ordinance.
Councilman Cooper: if tizey take t'.e same attitudc. on ".hese
licenses as they do on other thincrs in respect to Cite Council
I think it r..ight hethewrong approach in cettinc this set up.
Attorney Anderson: I would surcrest a public hearing as a
proper approach.'
Mayor Woodard: There are very few members of the Chamber of
Commerce who live in the City o. Tigard.
There was considerable discussion and review of traffic fines
charged by various Cities and upon the question of jurisdiction
of the streets, Attorney Anderson suggested., "I would "hold
that the City has police ,rowers anywhere in the City regardless
of ownership. We should consider and perhaps enact a tine
schedule because the Ordinance I drew on 'No Parking' has no
penalties. We should sea,:, up'a schedule and enact an Ordinance
and charge them whatever you are going to 'charge them;and it
o ul_S2 apply throughout the City unifoimly'.
There was some further review of traffic tickets, atter
which Councilman Bergmann moved"that Council accept the parking
ticket that Beaverton uses, with their fee schedule". Motion
seconded b, Councilman Johnson and upon call for 4vote,;the
motion was unanimously aprroved by Council.
Councilman Johnson huggested that it might be well for Council
t.
2-11=63 - Page 10.
91
..o think about the prob1e111 a re Corart .ent inspections ane'
Councilman Berorann i-•en1_, that^the r,.c .. A ocpart:�ent
erlployees co out ancd inspect properties.
favor 1100(31aro suck _ t' Pore .
_ tat Conn�ill;:a�? inn r.nt in tni,c^ _
with Chief Parnorover an' see if ti .le nsi-ect an, rlaco^ or if
,
taey will do i.tJan' see «inat he has to say al)out it. It wouI
be a goof'.. idea to have, sere Off these places i.nspectecl.
Do you have agytni ncr to ..
Attorney,Anderson: I ciaverile Ree r,l,et a letter to t^
Librarian d`SS the Suprer,e Court ,Libra:y an,. the i].S117i.es ought
to say it wry mailee sn i_hat , co,,,I.,1{ wakh chat l:rovisronr l
law- I also sent some printed C;iarters to
the r.uni.cipal
Research nureau, (The letter to the Lib rati.an and the nri.ntee
pamphlets of. the City Charter, with the properly signed
certification and tl,c City seal placed thereon, were forwardeli
to the Librarian by the f o17.o:vino mail.)
Mayor 1^7oodard reporter.', the City received a voucher :icor the PCE
for our share of the franchise for one-hal? year, 52,771.5C; also
that he had a meeting vitro !`?alley's representatives and rc9_terated
the stater-ent that they would have to live un to their contract
eaith the City until suet- time as our plant e.rpansi_on night
warrant .any increaseabove. their contract specifications.
Councilman Hanneman: The County_Plannine Departnent can assist
us in the future zoning of Tigard and since they have offerees
their services I would like to request a meeting with them,
primarily Larn, Bissett, for an evening,t'iat will be suitable
to all of us. blight I suggest the :peek of rebruary 15th since
there is no Council meeting that week. After discussion it
was finallzci,I.et, mile etin« would be bele mu s lay evening,
Pebruary 19th -A 7:30 P. Ii. in the Community Center..
ZOn//Ne7
Councilman ianneman: in the rough;Graft of this code there is
a statement of enactment in here, does that nean' that the Ordinance'
will be included in this Code?
Attorney Anderson: This code *.•sill be incorporated in the
Ordinance by reference. There will be an official code
annexed to the Ordinance as a part.
Councilman Hanneman: 74-11 it be possible to put riinor changes
in an addendum. .fit this time it would save us many hours of
work, I would n'tk. nt to say "strike out Planning Co^.mi ion
those words should e out of there and "Washington County shou.lr-
be out of there. WOL110, it do to co through the printed sheets
an,' ttype on those':
Attorney Anderson: Basically you are interested in aettina one
official copy, if people wanted a copy they could :lave a corrected
copy) corrected in any way. Xou merell want: to have one coIy.
WE
2-11-63 - Page 11';
Pin ""�
� .u_ r'•
cn
" t ,anC i'l "'le 11
7 17
t'} r.a• zr.. � �. ----
c c cn a lnEl r ,tiit•
man,aol a Zr L^ oto r
( )
'LIT) n
wa„ tu.r'. r 1 r,r...
n
�a an , a e rl" l1 a a -1 .i0
(;) )uiir apyro ilt,att ly
Cil. r 7: 1 Oa:'
Heavy roc.
into t.a.-1,nu_ on •ae ._ .a.pe
C c,e ;r soutn si?r c= br. . 1'r 00
=n
_.ii`a'-n st.rec'.
I wcul_. l.i;ce :« as?, Council's Pozmi..s ton to c�; a�iea anC.
-these jobs
a notion prod o have L1110
Councilman Hanneman:
• -
work cone as ;.termec 7_y I ayor
Councilman Cooper and.: upon call for vo4e wa+n .n1'.r ously
spprove& by Council.
Councilman Cooper raised ,:he c.,uest.a-on about ?r .s ieinc
;oo a , a w le ha('
thro�:vn into P'anno Cree7c 3'10 Mayor . ,
written sometime ag, t:i property. ov-nerz mond, tile Cree,",.
about the con0ition.
Favor ?voodard: V7e t,ill now
procee<= to Pa" the' b -1
Councilman Cooper read tine bi]-1 s an` upon compl ait on of tha
reacl .ng councilmantr ;anneman mpvecl 'r.1?e bills be Fa--d
astrto
motion seconcled bCouncilr;an Cooper anv^ upon being p
,ote`wa.s unanimously approver by Council.
Councilman Cooper movecl for a0iournment, seconded by.Council
man=`Bergmann ant; he mo..i.on was unanimously approvers by
Council.
Adjournment taken at 10:4-0 P. x
Resprlaa
ully submitted:
S
czz'r RECOPDE
ATTFS .
n'AYC1R_
4'r
2-11-53 -,Page 12.