Loading...
Resolution No. 10-58 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 10-5-0 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE WATER RATE STUDY WHICH PROVIDES A LONG-TERM FINANCING STRATEGY TO FUND THE LAKE OSWEGO-TIGARD WATE-R PARTNERSHIP AND OTHER WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the City of Tigard is the managing authority and water provider for the Tigard Water Service Area (I"WSA). The TWSA includes the residents of Durham, King City, two-thirds of Tigard, and the Tigard Water District; and WHEREAS, the Tigard Municipal Code, Chapter 12.10, defines the authority of the City to operate and maintain water utility services within the Tigard Water Service Area;and WHEREAS, the Intergovernmental Agreements for Delivery of Water Service, Sections 8.B., state that Tigard City Council has the authority to modify, alter or repeal the Rules, Rates and Regulations for Water Service within the Tigard Water Service Area;and WHEREAS, on October 13, 2010, the Intergovernmental Water Board recommended the Tigard City Council approve the Water Rate Study and the corresponding adjustments to water fees and charges; and WHEREAS, on August 6, 2008, following extensive analysis of various long-term water supply options, the City Council entered into the Lake Oswego-Tigard Water Partnership whereby the cities would jointly develop a shared water system;and WHEREAS, the Council may approve the use of bonds, secured with water utility revenues, as funding source for water partnership projects and other capital improvements;and WHEREAS, a water rate studl7 was necessary to support die issuance of bonds for the Lake Oswego Tigard Water Partnership;and WHEREAS, the City's consultant completed a comprehensive water financial plan which included a Water Rate Study and Water System Development Charge Update. The report provides an analysis of the additional revenue requirements needed for water-related operation and maintenance costs, and for projects associated with die Lake Oswego-Tigard Water Partnership and other capital improvements; and WHEREAS, the City's financial planner has reviewed the findings from the Water Rate Study and provided approval of recommended revenue bond strategy contained therein; and WHEREAS, the Water Rate Study provides Council with five major recommendations to improve revenue stability, provide equity among ratepayers, and continue water conservation efforts. These recommendations are: 1. Increase fixed rates based on increasing meter size. 2. Enhance water conservation by using a three-tiered inclining block rate. 3. Enhance water conservation by increasing the uniform water rates for industrial and irrigation users. 4. Implement monthly billing. RESOLUTION NO. 10 - Page 1 NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVE7D by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby adopts the Water Rate Study,Exhibit A, dated October 25,2010. SECTION 2: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This q67day 44o�p X2010. Mayor-City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 10 - Page 2 Exhibit A D• t b- n REDOA REDOK CONSULTING MEMORANDUM A DIVISION OF MALLOLM PINKIE To: John Goodrich, City of Tigard Date: October 25, 2010 From: Joe Healy, Red Oak Consulting Re: Water Rate Study Executive Summary Introduction The City of Tigard engaged Red Oak Consulting to update the City's water user charges. Among other goals, the City desired that fees encourage conservation while meeting the needs of its capital improvement plan. In August 2008, the cities of Lake Oswego and Tigard formally endorsed a partnership agreement for sharing drinking water resources and costs. Lake Oswego's water supply system is near capacity, and key.facilities need expansion and upgrades. Tigard residents need a secure, dependable water source. Both cities want to keep water affordable for their customers and sharing the cost of new infrastructure to serve both communities does that. The Lake Oswego—Tigard Water Partnership (Partnership) is expanding the City of Lake Oswego's existing water infrastructure to serve both the City of Lake Oswego and the City of Tigard. The Partnership will upgrade, upsize, and expand six existing facilities: 1. Raw Water Intake 2. Raw Water Pipeline 3. Water Treatment Plant 4. Treated Water Pipeline(s) 5. Treated Water Reservoir 6. Bonita Road Pump Station Given the size and scope of Partnership project costs, the City of Tigard (City) engaged Red Oak to complete a comprehensive financial planning and water rate study. Red Oak assisted the City in four main tasks, or phases, described below: a Phase 1. Develop the City's revenue requirements for the next ten years using a formal financial planning model. "Introducing the Partnership";Lake Oswego-Tigard Water Partnership; http://"vww.lotil ardwater.ora/?u=project-information;accessed 10/20/2010. 12670 NW Barnes Road • Suite 104 . Portland,OR 97229 • T 503-352-0900 • F 503-644-2414 • mvw.redoakconsulting.com Page 2 • Phase 2. Analyze the costs of service that will ensure the City collects its required revenues and meets the needs of stakeholders. • Phase 3. Analyze alternative conservation-oriented rate structures and provide the City with the right information to select the best rate structure for the City. Once the rate structure alternative is selected, conduct an affordability analysis to highlight the impact on customers. • Phase 4. Conduct an analysis of the City's non-recurring water charges, specifically fire line fees and charges. The results for each phase are provided below. Also attached to this Executive Summary memorandum are select results of Red Oak's analyses that have been delivered to the City throughout the execution of the water rate study. The attachments include: ➢ A—Financial Planning Technical Memorandum ➢ B—Financial Planning Summary Information ➢ C— Water Financial Plan Detailed Results For this study, generally accepted industry standards were followed in conducting the analyses. These industry standards were developed so that the results are proportionate to the cost the City incurs to serve its customers. Financial Plan Development Financial planning is an integral part of a comprehensive process of establishing the cost of service for a utility that incorporates a longer term perspective. A finance plan looks at a utility's long-term capital needs, typically from a master plan or similar document, along with other assumptions to calculate an overall level of rate adjustments and additional debt requirements for a five- to ten-year period. The portion of annual system revenue requirements to be recovered through rates is referred to as a utility's user charge revenue requirements (UCRR). The determination of a utility's UCRR depends on its financing policy and its other sources of income. Financial Planning Cost Components All of the City's expenditures can be classified as one of the following three cost components: • Capital Improvements • Debt Service • Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Costs Page 3 Each is briefly described below Capital Improvements Capital improvements consist of those large and costly additions to utility facilities that oftentimes occur infrequently and at irregular intervals. Capital improvement projects are designed to fulfill a range of needs including: • Compliance with new state and federal regulations, • Enhancement of the level and reliability of the service provided, • Meet ongoing demands of system growth and economic development, and • Replacement and refurbishment of existing system infrastructure. Debt Service Costs Utilities frequently finance major capital improvements by issuing long-term financial instruments for two primary reasons. First, the financial resources required for these types of projects typically exceed the utility's available resources from the normal operation of its system. Second, spreading the debt service costs for the project over the repayment period effectively spreads the financial burden of financing large improvements to both existing and future users of the system. This burden sharing allows the utility to better match the cost of improvements with those customers using the improvements. Operations and Maintenance Costs O&M costs account for most of the day-to-day expenditures for operating a water utility. O&M costs include, for example, labor, benefits, insurance, utilities, etc. Financial Policies Provisions of the City's bond covenants will require it to maintain minimum ratios for debt service coverage and meet other coverage requirements before it can issue additional debt. Debt Service Coverage Debt service coverage (DSC) is the ratio of the City's net revenues to its annual debt service subject to coverage requirements. With input from the City's financial advisor, Red Oak assumed that the City must maintain a minimum 1.15 DSC ratio if SDCs are included in the calculation of net revenues.2 In other words, the City's net revenue must, at a minimum, exceed its annual debt service by 15%. a If SDCs are excluded from the calculation of net revenue,a 1.05 DSC ratio is required. 'Net revenue is gross revenues less operating expenses. Operating expenses do not include depreciation expense. Page 4 Based on recommendations frorn Red Oak and the City's financial advisor, the City chose to set its minimum debt ratio targets higher than the minimum required. This is a matter of prudent financial policy, in which the City will strive to achieve a higher standard than the minimum requirements set forth in its bond covenants. Utilities commonly adopt higher standards to achieve better financial performance, and thereby, a higher bond rating. Additionally, by achieving target net revenue higher than its minimum requirements, the City will provide itself a degree of safety from technical default on its bonds in the case of unforeseen expenditures or revenue shortfalls in the future. For the purposes of this analysis, the target DSC ratio is 1.35 for all years if SDCs are included in the calculation of net revenues.4 Additional Bonds Test Similar to the DSC ratio requirements described above, the additional bonds test(ABT) is the ratio of the City's net revenues to its additional annual debt service for future bond issues after the initial projected issue in FY2012. With input from the City's financial advisor, Red Oak assumed that the City must maintain a minimum 1.15 ABT ratio. In other words, the City's net revenues must, at a minimum, exceed its additional total debt service by 15%. For the purposes of this analysis, the target ABT ratio is 1.25 for all years. Overview of Selected Financial Planning Alternative Red Oak developed several alternative financial plan scenarios for review by the City. Based on guidance from the City, the scenario presented in this report provides the City with a projection of the optimal mix of rate adjustments and additional debt financing to meet its capital requirements. The first annual rate increase under the selected scenario is scheduled to be completely effective in January 2011. This rate increase is based on need by utility, and will provide sufficient rate revenue for the remainder of FY2011 and half of FY2012. Beginning in January 2012 and every January thereafter, additional rate adjustments are projected dependent on need. Capital Improvements Table 1 presents individual examples of the City's largest planned capital expenditure projects over the course of the ten-year projection period used in this analysis (inflation included). 41f SDCs are excluded from the calculation of net revenue,a DSC ratio of 1.25 is targeted. s Net revenue is gross revenues less operating expenses. Operating expenses do not include depreciation expense. Page 5 Table 1: Largest Planned Capital Expenditures ASR Well 3Deszgn&Ecjuip� ( Muli� le U $2,736,000 ASR We114i;t Siting Study LL 1 FY2Q11 {„=3.0,000' E1SRWe114=—DesiDrll&Eui + ears ° °z '' F1'20172�°� � _, � ,2':84;810'' ASk Well*4 DrilLLy&Equip,Y `2 (50%) Multiple 4 1;42'w5,210 Pipelneconriecting5 SOG and 530Zo e De g FY20i17k242,124 Pipeline o ectingrt550G and 530 Zones .Constructioi{, Multiple $�' 2 262 442.> PS8 Construction• p T 24 8 6'10 _ 3. 1VTulti le.. .x, 550-:6270 755827x 550'Zone IOIvi�It M _ `;'W ��_Mult�ple 4' v 1!--, 69;043 , M ;WiEllamette SherwoodPipeline €g` � e r:., u tiple4400,000i Jomtt_ e Su 1 Pro ects* `x & Multi le c 112'057 883 f' Total *Note: Joint Water Supply total does not include$6 million already spent. The total cost for Joint Water Supply Projects shown in Table 1 is a summary project cost estimate for all projects included in the Lake Oswego—Tigard Water Partnership (Partnership). The Partnership will upgrade, upsize, and expand six existing facilities: 1. Raw Water Intake 2. Raw Water Pipeline 3. Water Treatment Plant 4. Treated Water Pipeline(s) 5. Treated Water Reservoir 6. Bonita Road Pump Station Table 2 presents a summary of the City's annual capital program costs used in this analysis (inflation included). Table 2: Annual Capital Program Costs W E TIF Y201sLa $9;91 147 MR FY2013 b 23;865;900. "6 ,, M FY2014 ! 43;44 7;985 e 3�,�. s�325�4. ;p�FY2Q&1749;06658N4• FY2018 6 935 477 * i FY2020 �. 909,01.?u �� f Totals r $,151,871363A = Page 6 Funding Sources Under this scenario, Red Oak's analysis assumes that the City will finance these improvements with a combination of cash from rate adjustments and by issuing over $125 million of additional long-term debt through FY2017. The sizing and timing of the projected long-term debt issues is shown in Table 3 below.6 Table 3: Projected Bond Issues e i , '2012=1" Revenue"Bonds 2014 w _Revenue Bonds _ 40.00, 201 5 ] 'Bond AntcipatzorNofes , t l 2016 Bond Anticipation Notes-",'-- _ 2017 � Revenue Bonds' " ' ��"' 41 34: r T9141160. ng-Term,Debt 11,141^1S,125-49 V Projected Revenue Requirements In this scenario, the majority of the City's revenue requirement is related to O&M and capital. Debt service for Lake Oswego Partnership capital is projected to represent a majority of the City's revenue requirement in the future. The projected annual debt service associated with the proposed bonds present an increasing percentage of the revenue requirements. Projected Revenues The first proposed annual rate increase is projected to be completely effective January 2011 (FY2011).' Based on this increase, the average residential customer's water bill would increase by $9.50 per month beginning in January 2011, when compared to bills prior to October 2010. The next rate adjustment would not be effective until January 2012.. At that time, the next adjustment is estimated to increase the average bill by $5.19 per month. Rate adjustments would continue to occur in January for each of the remaining projected years. The projected annual rate adjustments are summarized in 'The projected annual bond issues include estimates for issuance costs and the funding of reserve requirements. Issuance costs were assumed to be 2%of proceeds,and the reserve requirement is 10%. All projected bonds are assumed as 25-year term. FY2012 revenue bonds projected interest rate of 5.5%. All other bonds projected with 6.0%interest rate. 'The City implemented a 7.0%rate adjustment in October 2010. The remainder of the proposed FY2011 rate increase will be implemented January 2011. Page 7 Table 4 below. Projected annual rate adjustments, debt service coverage ratios, and additional long-term debt are summarized in Appendix B.8 Table 4: Total Annual Rate Adjustments —gin -�----�-------- �,,FY20.Ll E 345% -EI'2016 x ^4.3%o . _. ._ . - FY2012 14.0% FY2017 1� 4.3.0/o FY2014 - 14 0% FY2019. 0.0% F1'2015 4 3% Y202Q Impact on Fund Balances Typical financial management strategies include the maintenance of a minimum cash balance large enough to provide adequate working capital and meet future contingencies. The selected scenario maintains a minimum of 3 months of O&M in the operating fund balance, along with other minimum fund balance requirements related to future bond issues. By incorporating these fund balance requirements into the financial plan, the impacts of inflation are mitigated. Financial Planning Summary Conclusions The City is in a large investment cycle, and will need to fund large portions of its capital improvements with a combination of rate increases and long-term debt. The balance between rate increases and long-term debt protect the financial health of the City while maintaining the lowest possible user charges. Also, the use of long-term debt improves the equity among current and future rate payers since the improvements, specifically the Partnership projects, being constructed and financed by debt will provide service for more than 25 years. Findings and Recommendations Key findings of the financial planning analysis include: 1. The projections presented in this section are based on many assumptions that will inevitably vary over time. Red Oak recommends the City closely monitor its revenues and expenses and make necessary adjustments to its rates in the future. 2. Additionally, an increasing reliance on debt will require the City to closely examine its future financial performance. Specifically, the City's ending cash $The actual rate increases required to properly fund the City will likely vary from the estimates presented here. Future capital requirements,O&M expenditures,customer demands,etc.,will impact the accuracy of the estimates. The City should regularly review its revenue and expenses and recommend adjustments as necessary. Page 8 balances may need adjustment to account for the natural fluctuations in revenue that are not controllable by the City. 3. Given that the projected Partnership costs are estimates, Red Oak recommends that the City conduct an additional rate study three years from now. By FY2014, the City will have a record of Partnership expenditures to that point, and a much clearer forecast of remaining costs. An additional financial planning analysis and rate study will ensure that the City's rate revenue collections meet its requirements. Cost-of-Service Methodology The water cost-of-service (COS) methodology used in this study follows the industry standard approach called the base/extra-capacity approach described by the American Water Works Association (AWWA) in its Manual of Water Supply Practices: Principles of Water Rates, Fees, and Charges. This approach includes the following basic steps: 1. Establish customer characteristics. 2. Calculate revenue requirements. 3. Allocate costs. 4. Design rates. Each is briefly described below. Customer Characteristics Customers of a water utility are often identified according to customer class. Each customer class has unique water demand and usage characteristics. Because cost-of- service is based on the concept of proportionality, customer service characteristics for each customer class must be analyzed to allocate the system revenue requirements equitably. Revenue Requirements The portion of annual system revenue requirements to be recovered through rates depends on a utility's financing policy and its other sources of income. To determine the amount of revenue that rates must generate annually, the total revenue requirements must be reduced by non-rate or other system revenues. These non-rate revenues may include, but are not limited to, miscellaneous charges and interest earnings on unrestricted fund balances. Capital reserve funds may also provide revenue to offset costs of capital improvements. Page 9 Cost Allocations This study relies on the base/extra-capacity cost allocation methodology to allocate costs among customer classes. This methodology is more fully described in the AWWA Manual M1. Water systems are designed to meet both the average and peak demands of their customers. Therefore, data on total annual consumption and contributions to system peak demands, as mentioned in the section on customer characteristics, are needed to allocate costs fairly among customer classes. Data on the number of customers with meters of various sizes must also be available to allocate customer-related and meter-related costs. Rate Design Red Oak developed a rate design model (RDM) for the City that allowed it to measure the likely conservation and revenue impacts of various increasing block rate designs. Based on direction from the City, Red Oak developed a number of alternative rate analyses using the RDM. After discussions with the City, Red Oak identified a proposed solution which is presented below. Proposed Rate Design During the water rate study process, the City identified three primary goals for its new rate design and rate revenue collections. The goals are: 1. Equity, 2. Conservation, and 3. Financial Stability. Red Oak conducted a rate design workshop at the City's offices to develop a new rate design alternative for recommendation to the City Council and Intergovernmental Water Board (IWB). During the workshop, Red Oak and City Staff used Red Oak's RDM to run multiple scenarios and quickly assess alternative results. Source of Data The City provided its billing data for the study. The billing data consisted of individual customer accounts for the utility from FY2005 through FY2009. The FY2005 data had significant data deficiencies, but the other four historical years were sufficient for the analysis. Historically, the City's customers were billed a fixed bi-monthly charge and a uniform volume rate which varied by customer class. Currently, the City's fixed charge does not vary by meter size, and therefore does not accurately reflect the cost of maintenance system capacity for larger meters. Various meter equivalency schedules are published by the American Water Works Association (AWWA). Additionally, Red Oak calculated a meter equivalency schedule for the City based on actual use data developed using the Page 10 City's customer billing database. A summary of the meter equivalency schedules used in this analysis is provided in Table 5 below. Table 5: Meter Equivalency Schedules e 1.40, I-1/2P 00 2" 2.90 12.99 . p 4" ' 1.4.00 . 46.97. 6" _ 21.00 - ._50 00 8" 29.0080 00` 1 43.50 ' 225.07 The A W WA M 1 schedule in Table 5 represents the average cost to maintain meters of varying sizes by comparison to the smallest meter size shown. As an example to interpret the numbers provided in Table 5, AWWA estimates it costs a utility approximately 1.8- times as much to maintain a 1'/z-inch meter versus a%x 3/4-inch meter. Additionally, the City's actual billing data shows that customers with 1%-inch meters use eight-times as much water, on average, as customers with %x3/4-inch meters. These two equivalency schedules were applied to different components of the City's costs to develop alternative fixed charges as part of this analysis. Limitations Many assumptions, including price elasticity assumptions, are employed in an analysis like this. For this reason, results are not concrete in nature but are necessarily estimates. Red Oak assumes that the customer data it received from the City is accurate and representative of the number and types of customers that are actually in the City's service areas. Due to all of the variables involved when changing rates, it will likely take a significant amount of time to get a reliable projection of the results (i.e., more than 3 years). Fixed Charges Currently, the City's fixed bi-monthly charge is $6.86 regardless of meter size. The City also assesses a booster charge to customers in higher elevations that require additional pumping. Red Oak recommends a COS-based rate structure for two reasons: 1. Fixed charges that accurately reflect costs associated with larger meters will enhance equity among the City's customers, and ensure that customers with larger meters are paying their fair share of the water system's costs. Page 11 2. Increasing the revenue collected from fixed charges will improve the City's financial stability, as the City will be less dependent on volume rate revenues which vary due to weather, rate adjustments, and conservation efforts, among other reasons. Based on the needs identified in the financial planning phase of the water rate study, the City may choose to implement the fixed monthly charges shown in Table 6 and Table 7 in January of FY2011. The proposed fixed charges include two or three components, depending on the amount of pumping required to serve a customer. Table 6: Proposed Fixed Charges -Non-Boosted Customers 1�0 r M_- 01 $l. 7s s - 1 N 7.39 r 28.01 35.40 5Q 83 '9 '93 49 2 - - F,, 15.31 i; 136.37 ;— 151.68 7,7 382404�8 X4; .29 856 4" 73.92 493.19 567.12 80 8525 s00 81t: { 153.12 840.00 993:12 l.p 191 40` }1,8� 229.69' ; 2,363.26 2,592.94 12" C Table 7: Proposed Fixed Charges -Boosted Customers P1 ii0 C I + ' + + ' 1 ___J�._�. . _ 7 39_•x, . ._':28 01: I ___,.__a ___._� � ��.... �_a._._ L1 ;9,50 38 98 n 32 6Q] ,126;8 ..u<...wMT.'4.'.�,____'u._m4 ao� 2'' �15 31 136.37 �� 529 1 3 204:6°1 3;" �� _,-58.08: _240.48 ; .. 93.33391: 8u9 3-Tier Volume Rates Currently, the City charges a uniform volume rate that varies by customer class. In other words, customers are charged the same unit rate regardless of the amount of water consumed. Using the RDM, Red Oak and City Staff developed an increasing 3-tier volume rate structure for recommendation to the City Council.9 9 The 3-tier rate structure is proposed for the City's residential,multi-family,and commercial customers. Industrial and irrigation customers will maintain a uniform volume rate structure. Page 12 The RDM was designed to propose volume rates and tier thresholds for an increasing tier rate structure. Table 8 contains the proposed tier thresholds, per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU)10, used in the analysis. Table 8: Proposed Tier Thresholds per EDU Moloomoffik 1". 0 . Tier-2 7 15 ^, .. Tier Over 15 w The upper limits for Tier 1 and Tier 2 are based on the City's billing data. On a per-EDU basis, 6 CCF represents average winter monthly consumption. Similarly, 15 CCF represents average peak-season monthly consumption per EDU. Similar to the way the proposed fixed charges for larger meter sizes are increased by the City's actual use equivalency schedule, the proposed tier thresholds for larger meter sizes are increased using the same equivalency ratios. For volume rate billing, the tier thresholds are multiplied by the number of EDUs each meter size represents to establish the amount of water each customer will be charged for at each tier. Table 9 presents the proposed tier thresholds for all meter sizes. Table 9: Proposed Tier Thresholds (CCF) 5/8"x 3/4" r0 -,40 1, Over 40 1°U2" u 0 48 ' � 49 - 120, Over 1A20 2" 0 - 78 79 195 „r Over 19.5 138 =:3.44 3Over 3'4 _ _ 4 _. 4" _._ _... _._ 0 - 282 -- —283 =705 �i-- Over 705 6" 00 5 0 a3' a A 301 =750 ,Over 750 p 8" j'_ 0 i. __-481 - 1x,200 Over 1,200 TO" " O : 3'8 x93.9. 2;;5Over 2,345 :¢J 12" 0 1.;350 1;351 - 3;3:76 �" Over 3,376'. These thresholds represent a shift towards conservation-oriented rates from the City's current uniform rate structure. The proposed tier thresholds are based on meter size only. These thresholds apply to residential, multi-family, and commercial customers uniformly. 10 A 5/8 x'/4-inch meter represents one EDU. EDUs for larger meter sizes are assessed based on the City's actual use equivalency schedule shown in Table 5. Page 13 The proposed 3-tier volume rates from the RDM are shown in Table 10. Table 11 presents the uniform volume rates for the City's industrial and irrigation customer classes. Table 10: Proposed 3-Tier Volume Rates(per CCF) Multi i .Family 1.70 2.48 2.84 C,onmercial n. 2.;323:87 Table 11: Proposed Uniform Volume Rates Industrial $3 23 Irrigation 4.59 The volume rates presented above are based on the results of the COS analysis. As a starting point, Red Oak used the average cost of water by class, as calculated in the COS analysis, to establish the Tier 2 rates and uniform volume rates. The RDM set the Tier 1 and Tier 3 rates, and adjusted the meter and account component of the fixed charge as necessary to meet the City's overall revenue requirement. Cost-of-Service Rate Design Conclusions Calculating cost-of-service rates requires that both the use of the system and the cost of operations be estimated. In ratemaking, the costs of operating the utility are referred to as the utility's revenue requirements. Customer Demands One of the key elements to any cost-of-service analysis is an estimate of the likely customer demands. Estimating these demands, and subsequently, rates, is complex and subject to uncertainty. The forecast of demands in this analysis is based on recent water sales trends that may change due to external factors. External factors that impact water demands for the City include weather, economic growth or recession, and public attitudes. Rate Design Findings and Recommendations Key findings from the RDM include: 1. Due to the nature of the revenue adjustments proposed in this study, the City will need to closely watch its revenues from year to year. Many variables can alter a utility's revenue stream, including changes in weather, the local and regional economy, and customers' reaction to rate adjustments. 2. One of the challenges in adjusting rates is accurately predicting a revenue neutral rate design, where revenues earned after a rate adjustment equal those prior to the Page 14 rate adjustment. Without a precise count of customers and EDUs, it is more difficult to project a utility's total revenues. Although the City appears to have a solution for conservation-oriented residential rates, the City should take great care to mitigate risk by following prudent management practices. This includes reviewing rates and revenues at least annually to see if additional adjustments are necessary. D City of Tigard Water Rate Study Executive Summary v. 3 v v_ v � C: 3 m 0 SECTION 0 m Financial Planning Technical Memorandum •. :: REBDA K • • •• CONSULTING • • A DIVISION 0( MALCOLM PIRNIE 6812001 / POR 3 U RE4iGA K.CONSULTTISG PfW$51014 OF MALG44M P,flWtE MEMORANDUM To: John Goodrich, City of Tigard Date: September 28, 2010 From: Joe Healy, Red Oak Consulting Re: Summary of Recommended Financial Planning Scenario Introduction The cost of service for the City includes both near-term and long-term capital expenditures. Financial planning is an integral part of a comprehensive process of establishing the cost of service for a utility that incorporates a longer term perspective. A finance plan looks at a utility's long-term capital needs, typically from a master plan or similar document, along with other assumptions to calculate an overall level of rate adjustments and additional debt requirements for a five- to ten-year period. Broad Overview of Financial Planning The financial plan is a useful tool. Actually, it may be described as four tools in one. The four main functions that a financial plan serves are for the following: 1. Planning 2. Communication 3. Information 4. Policy Assessment As relevant for the purposes of this memo, the policy assessment aspect of financial planning is described more fully below. Financial Plan as a Policy Assessment Tool Policy assessment means a wide-variety of things to different people. A utility's stakeholders may use financial plan results to assess how its policies and goals for the utility stand the tests of time. A utility's management may use financial plan information to assess the cost effectiveness of operations or infrastructure replacement. First and foremost, a utility may use the plan to assess the long-term implications of capital decisions. Topics related to capital decisions include: • Scenario analysis, • Sensitivity analysis, • Financing options, • Operating costs, • Matching revenues with expenditures, and - 12670 NW Barnes Road - Suite 104 - Portland,OR 97229 - T 503-352-0900 - F 503-644-2414 - www.redoakconsulting.com A-2 • Managing rate adjustments over time. As mentioned above, a financial plan is a tool used for alternatives analysis. Regarding its financing options, a utility can use the financial plan to assess its plans for the use of additional long-term debt and capital reserves. Questions surrounding this issue include: • What is an appropriate level of debt? • How much can we afford? • Should we accumulate and use capital reserves to mitigate the need for debt in the future? • Will certain capital additions also affect our O&M projections? • How will we best match our need to recover costs with the available revenue sources? • How can we avoid rate shock to our customers or send them price signals to influence conservation goals? Along with all of these questions, the financial plan can be used to assess the impacts of legal, institutional, and regulatory requirements. The lists of questions above reinforce the idea of a financial plan as a broadly focused planning tool. If it were designed to meet more narrowly focused needs, such as budgeting or auditing, it would lose its ability to capture and address these wide-ranging issues. Side effects of a utility's failure to plan properly may include system deterioration or failure, higher financing costs, rate and revenue instability, limited choices, rate shock, and unhappy customers. Summary of Assumptions for Recommended Financial Planning Scenario Red Oak analyzed alternative financial planning scenarios. The results were presented to the City in a previous technical memorandum. Presented below are the assumptions underlying the financial planning scenario selected by City Staff for recommendation to the City Council, Table 1: Recommended Financial Plan Scenario - General Assum tions e oSalim Financ►,ng Schedule„, „ 2012��Renue�Bonds �_;,, .; �a � � ��_�„FMLL _, 2016 Bond Anticipation Notes s 77 - e c >2017,Reeven e ondS 4 � f TargetRat�o � Total!DebtSerCo ear gls � YG Min Re aired Ratios AdditonalBoTest#�1 25xfor 201`2 Revenue Bonds i Additio al Bonds Test ILSz for all',other Revenue Bonds Total_Debt Seruce 110x8 , Interests ates ��'k �� �”�5�5%for�201�2�Revenue Bonds 0%oAfor all other finan"cmg Term �m ,u �S�year term for all ficiancmg, ,w. ;,,, ,. =t A-3 Summary of Results Presented below are the summary results of the recommended financial planning scenario. Table 2: Recommended Financial Plan Scenario - Summary Results F011 37 OS Mi, 3.4.5% _., $2097;054 FY2012 42 24 �T.T14 0%{� F 44147;727 FY2013 4816 ;t FY2014 54 90=s.;� 1.4,.0%� ,,-4000,0000 FY2015 0 FYN 6 j 59 2 p: .5 m FY2017 62.29 j 4 3%, i 41 341,374 -- - - - - - FY20,f .F � - �64 97 4 3%0 FY2019 64.97 a 0.0% Q $127 586,1.55 * Residential example monthly bill. Monthly use assumed at 9 CCF. 0— ra. City of Tigard Water Rate Study Executive Summary SECTION co 5' v o M Financial Planning Summary 0 o � nn Information C 3 3 v REBDAK. • • •' CONSULTING • • A DIVISION Of MALCOLM PIRNIf 6812001 / POR Water Financial Plan City of Tigard Water Financial Plan Results - Summary of Financial Metrics 0 • � � I 1 1 1 I 1 � Increased Revenues Required 34.5% 14.0% 14.0% 14.0% 4.3% 4.3% Financial Ratios DSC (w/ SDCs) 40.30 3.35 2.22 1.79 1.49 1.56 Add'l Bonds Test(w/ SDCs) 20.15 1.75 2.22 1.36 1.49 1.56 DSC (w/o SDCs) 40.30 3.03 2.04 1.67 1.40 1.45 Add'] Bonds Test(w/o SDCs) 20.15 1.59 2.04 1.27 1.40 1.45 Additional Long-Term Debt(millions) $2.10 $44.15 $0.00 $40.00 $0.00 $0.00 Annual Debt Service(millions) $0.08 $1.80 $3.45 $5.01 $6.58 $6.58 Year-End Reserves (millions) Water Fund $1.46 $4.64 $7.60 $3.81 $5.96 $8.46 Debt Service Fund 0.22 4.62 4.62 8.62 8.62 8.62 Totals $1.68 $9.26 $12.22 $12.43 $14.59 $17.09 W `' City of Tigard Water Rate Study Executive Summary SECTION Water Financial Plan Detailed Results v ( � cn0 03 0 Q REMAK • • •• CONSULTING • • A DIVISION OF MALCOLM PIRNIE 6812001 / POR Water Financial Plan Table 1 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan Tigard CIP Total Descri tion Line FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2011-20 ASR Well 3-Design&Equip 1 $259,804 $2,304,397 $45,761 $2,609,963 ASR Well 4-Siting Study 2 30,000 30,000 ASR Well 4-Design,Drill&Equip Year 1(50%) 3 1,859,000 1,859,000 ASR Well 4-Drill&Equip Year2(50%) 4 1,115,000 1,115,000 New Pump Station-Siting Study 5 50,000 50,000 New Pump Station-Design 6 255,000 255,000 New Pump Station-Construction Year 1(67%) 7 963,000 963,000 New Pump Station-Construction Year 2(33%) 8 481,000 481,000 New PRV from 550G to 410 Zone 9 105,000 105,000 Pipeline connecting 5506 and 530 Zones-Design 10 197,000 197,000 Pipeline connecting 550G and 530 Zones-Constructic 11 1,770,000 1,770,000 Annual Fire Flow Improvement Allocation 12 100,000 100,000 100,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,100,000 Pipeline for installing PRV 550G4 13 17,000 17,000 Pipeline in Main St.&Tigard Ave. 14 101,000 101,000 Water Master Plan Update 15 140,000 140,000 Asset Management Program 16 100,000 100,000 Res.Seismic&Condition Assessment 17 100,000 100,000 PS8-Design 18 210,000 210,000 PS8-Construction 19 1,900,000 1,900,000 550-6270-755827-550'Zone IOMil 20 3,543,043 221,569 3,764,612 Joint Water Supply Projects 21 4,347,998 5,245,436 17,424,543 33,012,465 27,522,199 1,288,111 458,407 89,299,160 Willamette Sherwood Pipeline 22 1,000,000 3,333,333 4,333,333 Repayment of Prior LOC 23 225,000 5,936,275 6,161,275 SDC Methodology Update 24 25,000 25,000 Water Main Line Oversizing 25 100,000 98,039 142,776 137,284 132,004 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 1,360,103 BANsAdjustments-L.O.Projects 26 (27,522,199) (1,288,111) 28,810,310 0 BANS Adjustments-Other 27 (813,004) (390,000) 1,203,004 0 Unfunded CIP Adjustment 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total(w/o Inflation) $9,494,041 $15,144,456 $20,126,716 $34,358,511 $0 $0 $33,087,721 $5,135,000 $350,000 $350,000 $118,046,445 Expected Expenditure Rates 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Inflation Factor 1-All other projects Expected Inflation Rate 0.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% Inflation Factor 1.000 1.020 1.051 1.093 1.136 1.182 1.229 1.278 1.329 1.383 Inflation Factor 2-Joint Water Supply Projects Expected Inflation Rate-Joint Water Supply Projects 0.0% 12.4% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% Inflation Factor-Joint Water Supply Projects 1.000 1.124 1.191 1.263 1.339 1.419 1.504 1.594 L690 1.791 Capital Outlays $417,100 $249,652 $266,699 $284,949 $304,490 $325,416 $347,830 $371,840 $397,565 $425,131 $3,390,671 Expected Capital Expenditures w/Inflation $9,911,141 $16,242,522 $23,865,900 $43,447,985 $304,490 $325,416 $49,066,585 $6,935,477 $862,835 $909,012 $151,871,363 Total Growth-Related CIP $5,684,928 $2,824,739 $8,891,595 $17,519,817 $15,190,361 $739,386 $2,592,653 $1,744,667 $0 $0 $55,188,146 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan Table 2 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan Capital Improvement Plan(With Inflation) Descri tion I Line FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 I Total ASR Well 3-Design&Equip 1 $0 $265,000 $2,421,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,736,000 ASR Well 4-Siting Study 2 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 ASR Well 4-Design;Drill&Equip Year 1(50%) 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,284,810 0 0 0 2,284,810 ASR Well 4-Drill&Equip Year 2(50%) 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,425,210 0 0 1,425,210 New Pump Station-Siting Study 5 0 51,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51,000 New Pimp Station-Design 6 0 0 267,903 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 267,903 New Pump Station-Construction Year 1(67%) 7 0 0 0 1,052,197 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,052,197 New Pump Station-Construction Year 2(33%) 8 0 0 0 0 546,574 0 0 0 0 0 546,574 New PRV from 550G to 410 Zone 9 105,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 105,000 Pipeline connecting 550G and 530 Zones-Design 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 242,124 0 0 0 242,124 Pipeline connecting 550G and 530 Zones-Constructic 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,262,442 0 0 2,262,442 Annual Fire Flow Improvement Allocation 12 0 0 0 109,262 113,633 118,178 245,811 255,643 265,869 276,504 1,384,900 Pipeline for installing PRV 550G4 13 17,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,000 Pipeline in Main St.&Tigard Ave. 14 101,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 101,000 Water Master Plan Update 15 0 0 0 0 0 165,449 0 0 0 0 165,449 Asset Management Program 16 0 0 0 109,262 0 0 0 0 0 0 109,262 Res.Seismic&Condition Assessment 17 0 0 0 0 113,633 0 0 0 0 0 113,633 PS8-Design 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 258,101 0 0 0 258,101 PS8-Construction 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,428,610 0 0 2,428,610 550-6270-755827-550'Zone IOMil 20 3,543,043 226,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,769,043 Joint Water Supply Projects 21 4,347,998 5,895,870 20,760,298 41,692,314 36,844,023 1,827,860 689,520 0 0 0 112,057,883 Willamette Sherwood Pipeline 22 1,000,000 3,400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,400,000 Repayment of Prior LOC 23 225,000 6,055,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,280,000 SDC Methodology Update 24 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,000 Water Main Line Oversizing 25 100,000 100,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 177,267 184,358 191,732 199,402 207,378 1,610,137 BANS Adjustments-L.O.Projects 26 0 0 0 0 (36,844,023) (1,827,860) 43,335,475 0 0 0 4,663,593 BANS Adjustments-Other 27 0 0 0 0 (923,840) (460,895) 1,478,556 0 0 0 93,821 Unfunded CIP Adjustment 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total(w/Inflation) $9,494,041 $15,992,870 $23,599,201 $43,163,036 $0 ($0) $48,718,755 $6,563,637 $465,270 $483,881 $148,480,692 N 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan Table 3 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan Funding Sources for Improvements Descri tion FY2011 I FY2012 I FY2013 I FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 I FY2017 I FY2018 I FY2019 I FY2020 Total Construction Fund $7,794,798 $15,572,837 $23,277,246 $42,827,198 ($350,319) ($365,425) $48,337,573 $6,166,018 $465,270 $483,881 $144,209,078 Water(Operating)Fund Capital Outlays 417,100 249,652 266,699 284,949 304,490 325,416 347,830 371,840 397,565 425,131 3,390,671 Grant Funded Capital 1,699,243 108,390 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,807,633 Improvement SDC Account 0 311,643 321,955 335,838 350,319 365,425 381,182 397,619 0 0 2,463,981 Total $9,911,141 $16,242,522 $23,865,900 $43,447,985 $304,490 $325,416 $49,066,585 $6,935,477 $862,835 $909,012 $151,871,363 C7 w 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan Table 4 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan Projected Debt Issue Size and Costs Descri tion FY2011 I FY2012 FY2013 I FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 I FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Issue Sizing&Type(select Type for each year) Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Bond Proceeds Required $1,845,407 $38,850,000 $0 $35,200,000 $0 $0 $36,380,409 $0 $0 $0 Issuance Costs 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% Reserve Requirement 10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 1000% 10.00% Reserve Req? Revenue Bonds Issue Size Yes $2,097,054 $44,147,727 $0 $40,000,000 $0 $0 $41,341,374 $o $0 $0 G.O.Bonds Issue Size No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Debt Service Requirements Term(Years) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Interest Rate 5.50% 5.50% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% Subject to Coverage? Annual Debt Service Costs $156,334 $3,291,185 $0 $3,129,069 $0 $0 $3,234,000 $0 $0 $0 Accumulated Debt Service TRUE 78,167 1,801,926 3,447,518 5,012,053 6,576,587 6,576,587 8,193,587 9,810,587 9,810,587 9,810,587 Annual G.O.Debt Service Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Accumulated G.O.Debt Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C7 a 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan Table 5 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan Annual Debt Service Subject to Coverage Requirements Subject to Descri tion I Requirement I FY2011 I FY2012 I FY2013 I FY2014 I FY2015 I FY2016 I FY2017 I FY2018 I FY2019 FY2020 Existing Debt Service Subtotal $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Debt Service on Proposed Debt TRUE $78,167 $1,801,926 $3,447,518 $5,012,053 $6,576,587 $6,576,587 $8,193,587 $9,810,587 $9,810,587 $9,810,587 Total Debt Service $78,167 $1,801,926 $3,447,518 $5,012,053 $6,576,587 $6,576,587 $8,193,587 $9,810,587 $9,810,587 $9,810,587 n in 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan C-6 Table 6 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan Estimated O&M Costs by Year Escalation Description Rate FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 I FY2015 FY2016 I FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Salaries-Management 7.7% $15o $161380 $174,276 $187,737 $202,237 $217,858 $234,685 $252,812 $272339 $293,374 Salaries-General 6.3%, 536,996 570.994 607,144 645.584 686.456 729,917 776,129 825,267 877,516 933,072 Part Time-Temporary 3.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 0 0 Overtime 6,0% 25,000 26,500 28,090 29.775 31,562 33,456 35,463 37,591 39,846 42,237 Unemployment 3.0% 684 705 726 747 770 793 817 841 866 892 Worker's Compensation 7.1% 20,569 22,026 23.585 25,256 27,044 28,959 31,010 33.206 35,558 38,076 Social Securig/Medicare 5.3'7. 52.570 55,373 58,325 61,434 64,709 68,159 71,792 75,620 79,651 83,898 Tri-Met Tae 6.6% 4.684 4,995 5,327 5,690 6,057 6,459 6,888 7.345 7.833 8,353 Retirement 6.7% 70,218 74,906 79,907 85,242 90,933 97,005 103,481 110,390 117,760 125,623 Retirement-3%ERMatch 6.7% 4,505 4,805 5,126 5,468 5,832 6,221 6,636 7,079 7,551 8,055 VEBA-ER 3.0% 10,200 10,506 10.821 11,146 11.480 11,825 12,179 12.545 12.921 13.309 Life Ins/ADD/LTD 6,0%, 2,520 2,671 2,831 3,001 3,181 3.372 3,575 3.789 4,016 4.257 Long Term Disability 3.0'7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 Medical/Dental/Vision 6.0% 145,131 153,839 163,069 172,853 183.225 194,218 205,871 218.223 231,317 245,196 Dental Benefits 3.0'% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Office Supplies 60% 2,000 2.120 2247 2,382 2,525 2,676 2,837 3,007 3.188 3.379 Small Tools&Equipment 3.0'% 20,043 20,644 21,264 21,902 22,559 23.235 23,932 24,650 25,390 26,152 Fuel 3.0% 25,500 26265 27,053 27,865 28300 29.561 30,448 3L362 32,303 33,272 Water Costs:L.O.&Ptld 6.0% 3.362.145 3.563 874 3,777,706 4,004,368 4,244,631 4,499,308 1,265,137 1,341,046 1421,508 1,506,799 Professional/Contractual Services 6.0% 384,390 407.453 431,901 457,815 485,284 514,401 545,265 577,980 612,659 649,419 Water Costs:Sampling 3.0% 39,745 40,937 42,165 43.430 44,733 46,075 47,458 48,881 50,348 51,858 Legal Fees 3.0% 30,900 31,827 32,782 33,765 34.778 35,822 36,896 38,003 39.143 40,317 R&M-Facilities 6.0% 8,500 9;010 9,551 10,124 10,731 11,375 12,057 12,781 13,548 14,361 R&M-Water Lines 9.7% 70,000 76.102 82,736 89,948 97 789 106,313 1 15,581 125,656 136,610 148.518 R&M-Control Valves 6.0'7 17,000 18,020 19,101 20,247 21,462 22,750 24.115 25,562 27,095 28.721 R&M-Reservoir 60% 6,000 6,360 6,742 7,146 7,575 8,029 8,511 9,022 9,563 10.137 R&M-Grounds 60'% 12,000 12,720 13,483 14,292 15,150 16,059 17.022 18,044 19,126 20,274 R&M-Pump Station 6.0% 8,500 9.010 9,551 10.124 10,731 11.375 12,057 12,781 13,548 14,361 R&M-SCADA 60"0 8.000 8,480 8,989 9,528 10,100 10.706 11,348 12.029 12,751 13,516 R&M-Wells 3.0'7. 11,500 11,845 12,200 12.566 12,943 13,332 13,732 14,144 14,568 15,005 R&M-Meters 6.0'7 227.100 113,550 120,363 127,585 135,240 143,354 151,956 161,073 170,737 180,981 R&M-Service Lines 3.0'7, 20.500 21,115 21,748 22,401 23,073 23,765 24,478 25.212 25,969 26,748 R&M-Regulators 3.0% (1 0 (1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R&M-Fire Hvdrmt 60% 120,000 60,000 63,600 67.416 71,461 75,749 80,294 85,111 90,218 95,631 R&M-Vehicles 3.0'7 25,000 25,750 26.523 27.318 28,138 28,982 29,851 30.747 31,669 32,619 Utilities-Electric 6.0'% 271,728 288,032 305,314 323,632 343,050 363,633 385,451 408,578 433,093 459,079 Utilities-Water/Setccr/SWM 60% 1,000 1,060 1.124 1,191 1,262 1,338 1,419 1504 1.594 1,689 Utilites-Phone/Pager/Culls 6.0'7 9.706 10288 14906 11,560 12,254 12,989 13,768 14,594 15-470 16,398 Advertising&Publicity 60% 43.167 45;757 48,502 51,413 54,497 57,767 61,233 64,907 68,802 72.930 Fees and Charges 60%, 1725 1.829 1,938 2,055 2,178 2,308 2,447 2.594 2.749 2,914 Dues&Subscriptions 30% 6.900 7,107 7,320 7,540 7.766 7,999 8,239 8,486 8.741 9,003 Travel and Training 3.3'% 7,250 7,492 7,742 8.000 8,266 8,542 8,827 9,121 9,425 9,740 Conservation Expenses 3,0% 31.700 32,651 33,631 34,639 35,679 36,749 37,851 38.987 40.157 41,361 Insurance 3.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Property Damage 6.0% 5,750 6.095 6.461 6.848 7,259 7,695 8,156 8,646 9,165 9,715 Rents and Leases 3.0% 3.000 1.090 3,183 3.278 3,377 3,478 3.582 3,690 3,800 3.914 Bad Debt Expense 60% 5.750 6,095 6.461 6,848 7.259 7,695 8.156 9,646 9,165 9,715 Special Department Expenses 60'% 8000 8.480 8.989 9,528 10,100 10,706 11,348 12,029 12-751 13,516 Vehicles 3.0%, 70,000 72.100 74.263 76,491 78,786 81,149 93,584 86091 88-674 91,334 Computer Hardware and Software 3.0% 3,100 3,193 3,289 3,387 3,489 3,594 3,702 3,813 3,927 4,045 Equipment 3.0% (l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interdepartmental Costs 3.0% 443,482 456,786 470,490 484,6115 499,143 514,117 529,541 545.427 561,790 578.643 AMR Program O&M 6.0% 0 100,000 106,000 112,360 119.102 126,248 133,823 141,852 150,363 159,385 Monthly Billing Program Adj. 63% 0 50,000 53,166 56532 60.111 63,916 67,963 72,266 76,841 81,706 Total 0&M Costs $6.334,338 $6,654,237 $7,037,707 $7,444,053 $7,874,667 $8,331,033 $5,310,593 $5,613,029 $5,933621 $6273.495 Less Capital Ondava $417,100 $249.652 $266699 $284,949 $304,490 $325,416 $347.830 $371,840 $397,565 $425,131 Net O&M Costs $5,9.17.238 $6404.585 $6,771008 $7,159,104 $7.570,177 $8,005.617 $4,962,763 $5,241,189 $5,536,056 $5,848365 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan C-7 Table 7 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan O&M Manual Overrides Descri tion I Escalation I FY2012 I FY2013 I FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Salaries-Management 7.7% Salaries-General 6.3% Part Time-Temporary 3.0% Overtime 6.0% Unemployment 3.0% Worker's Compensation 7.1% Social Security/Medicare 5.3% Tri-Met Tax 6.6% Retirement 6.7% Retirement-3%ER Match 6.7% VEBA-ER 3.0% Life Ins/ADD/LTD 6.0% Long Term Disability 3.0% Medical/Dental/Vision 6.0% Dental Benefits 3.0% Office Supplies 6.0% Small Tools&Equipment 3.0% Fuel 3.0% Water Costs:L.O.&Pild 6.0% 1,265,137 Professional/Contractual Services 6.0% Water Costs:Sampling 3.0% Legal Fees 3.0% R&M-Facilities 6.0% R&M-Water Lines 8.7% R&M-Control Valves 6.0% R&M-Reservoir 6.0% R&M-Grounds 6.0% R&M-Pump Station 6.0% R&M-SCADA 6.0% R&M-Wells 3.0% R&M-Meters 6.0% 113,550 R&M-Service Lines 3.0% R&M-Regulators 3.0% R&M-Fire Hydrant 6.0% 60,000 R&M-Vehicles 3.0% Utilities-Electric 6.0% Utilities-Water/Sewer/SWM 6.0% Utilites-Phone/Pager/Cells 6.0% Advertising&Publicity 6.0% Fees and Charges 6.0% Dues&Subscriptions 3.0% Travel and Training 3.3% Conservation Expenses 3.0% Insurance 3.0% Property Damage 6.0% Rents and Leases 3.0% Bad Debt Expense 6.0% Special Department Expenses 6.0% Vehicles 3.0% Computer Hardware and Software 3.0% Equipment 3.0% Interdepartmental Costs 3.0% AMR Program O&M 6.0% 100,000 Monthly Billing Program Adj. 6.3% 50,000 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan Table 8 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan Number of Water Meters by Meter Size and Customer Class Meter Size TWSA I Unused Unused Total Meters 5/8 x 3/4-Inch 15,635 0 0 1-Inch 1,604 0 0 1 1/2-Inch 375 0 0 2-Inch 320 0 0 3-Inch 24 0 0 4-Inch 11 0 0 6-Inch 5 0 0 8-Inch 5 0 0 Totals 17,979 0 0 CO 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan Table 9 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan Equivalency Factors Meter Size TWSA Unused Unused 5/8 x 3/4-Inch 1.00 1-Inch 2.67 1 1/2-Inch 8.00 2-Inch 12.99 3-Inch 22.90 4-Inch 46.97 6-Inch 50.00 8-Inch 80.00 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan Table 10 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan Number of EDUs by Meter Size and Customer Class Meter Size TWSA Unused Unused 5/8 x 3/4-Inch 15,635 0 0 1-Inch 4,279 0 0 1 1/2-Inch 2,999 0 0 2-Inch 4,156 0 0 3-Inch 550 0 0 4-Inch 517 0 0 6-Inch 250 0 0 8-Inch 400 0 0 Totals 28,785 0 0 0 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan Table 11 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan EDU Forecast Description FY2011 I FY2012 I FY2013 FY2014 I FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 EDUs TWSA 28,785 28,785 28,872 28,958 29,045 29,132 29,220 29,307 29,395 29,483 Total 28,785 28,785 28,872 28,958 29,045 29,132 29,220 29,307 29,395 29,483 New EDUs TWSA 0 86 87 87 87 87 88 88 88 88 Total 0 86 87 87 87 87 88 88 88 88 Growth Rate TWSA 0.0% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% System Growth 0.0% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% C7 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan Table 12 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan SDC Forecast Descri tion FY2011 I FY2012 FY2013 I FY2014 I FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 I FY2018 I FY2019 FY2020 Annual SDC Escalation Rate Improvement NA 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% Reimbursement NA 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% Improvement Fee TWSA $3,538 $3,609 $3,717 $3,866 $4,020 $4,181 $4,348 $4,522 $4,703 $4,891 Reimbursement Fee TWSA $2,936 $2,994 $3,084 $3,207 $35336 $3,469 $3,608 $3,752 $3,902 $4,058 n N 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan Table 13 City of Ti-ard Water Financial Plan Forecast of SDC Revenues Description FY2011 I FY2012 I FY2013 FY2014 I FY2015 FY2016 I FY2017 I FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Improvement Fee TWSA $0 $311,643 $321,955 $335,838 $350,319 $365,425 $381,182 $397,619 $414,764 $432,649 Total $0 $311,643 $321,955 $335,838 $350,319 $365,425 $381,182 $397,619 $414,764 $432,649 Reimbursement Fee TWSA $0 $258,575 $267,131 $278,649 $290,665 $303,198 $316,272 $329,910 $344,136 $358,975 Total $0 $258,575 $267,131 $278,649 $290,665 $303,198 $316,272 $329,910 $344,136 $358,975 Grand Total $0 $570,217 $589,086 $614,487 $640,984 $668,623 $697,454 $727,529 $758,900 $791,623 n w 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan Table 14 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan Estimated Revenues Descri tion FY2011 I FY2012 I FY2013 I FY2014 I FY2015 I FY2016 I FY2017 I FY2018 I FY2019 FY2020 Water Assumptions Rate Revenue Increases 34.50% 14.00% 14.00% 14.00% 4.30% 4.30% 4.30% 4.30% 0.00% 0.00% Month of Rate Increase 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Prorated Percent Impact of Increase 38.01% 62.22% 62.22% 62.22% 62.22% 62.22% 62.22% 62.22% 62.22% 62.22% Meter Growth 0.00% 0.30% 030% 0.30% 0.30% 0.30% 0.30% 030% 0.30% 0.30% Sales Growth 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% System Growth 0.00% 0.30% 0.30% 0.30°% 0.30% 0.30% 0.30°% 0.30% 0.30°% 0.30% Revenues User Charge Revenues-Water Before Increase $7,887,387 $10,640,361 $12,166,402 $13,911,307 $15,906,467 $16,640,216 $17,407,813 $18,210,818 $19,050,864 $19,108,017 Revenues from Increase 1,034,419 926,854 1,059,784 1,211,778 425,568 445,199 465,736 487,220 0 0 Total User Charges $8,921,806 $11,567,215 $13,226,185 $15,123,085 $16,332,035 $17,085,415 $17,873,549 $18,698,037 $19,050,864 $19,108,017 Revenue Summary User Charge Revenues-Water Revenues Before Increase $7,887,387 $10,640,361 $12,166,402 $13,911,307 $15,906,467 $16,640,216 $17,407,813 $18,210,818 $19,050,864 $19,108,017 Revenues from Increase 1,034,419 926,854 1,059,784 1,211,778 425,568 445,199 465,736 487,220 0 0 Total User Charges $8,921,806 $11,567,215 $13,226,185 $15,123,085 $16,332,035 $17,085,415 $17,873,549 $18,698,037 $19,050,864 $19,108,017 Non-Rate Revenues(net of related expenses) Developer Overhead $10,000 $10,030 $10,060 $10,090 $10,121 $10,151 $10,181 $10,212 $10,243 $10,273 Miscellaneous Fees/Charges 2,500 2,508 2,515 2,523 2,530 2,538 2,545 2,553 2,561 2,568 Other Utility Sales 4,443 4,456 4,470 4,483 4,497 4,510 4,524 4,537 4,551 4,564 Leaks/Misreads Credits (22,915) (22,984) (23,053) (23,122) (23,191) (23,261) (23,331) (23,401) (23,471) (23,541) Meter Sales 27,679 27,762 27,845 27,929 28,013 28,097 28,181 28,266 28,350 28,435 Fire Hydrant Flow Testing Srvc 2,000 2,006 2,012 2,018 2,024 2,030 2,036 2,042 2,049 2,055 Late Penalties/Charges 120,774 121,136 121,500 121,864 122,230 122,597 122,964 123,333 123,703 124,074 Returned Check Fees 1,286 1,290 1,294 1,298 1,302 1,305 1,309 1,313 1,317 1,321 Bad Debt (20,483) (20,544) (20,606) (20,668) (20,730) (20,792) (20,854) (20,917) (20,980) (21,043) Miscellaneous Fees&Charges 420 421 423 424 425 426 428 429 430 431 Rental Income 66,492 66,691 66,892 67,092 67,294 67,495 67,698 67,901 68,105 68,309 Interest Earnings-Water Fund 9,673 30,492 122,395 114,079 97,716 144,271 96,870 25,160 62,137 132,562 Total Non-Rate Revenues $201,869 $223,265 $315,746 $308,010 $292,228 $339,367 $292,552 $221,429 $258,995 $330,010 Total Revenues $9,123,675 $11,790,480 $13,541,931 $15,431,095 $16,624,263 $17,424,783 $18,166,100 $18,919,466 $19,309,859 $19,438,027 (7 A 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan Table 15 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan Calculation of Revenue Proration by Month Sales Subject to Percent of Fiscal Average Month Month I Increase I Year I FY2007 I FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 Revenues January 1 $2,764,448 38.01% $576,469 $529,934 $498,881 $535,095 February 2 2,229,353 30.66% 300,272 287,414 468,560 474,462 382,677 March 3 1,846,676 25.39% 462,291 456,469 .436,321 573,940 482,255 April 4 1,364,421 18.76% 414,491 422,605 397,807 324,957 389,965 May 5 974,456 13.40% 524,889 485,369 508,112 506,123 June 6 468,332 6.44% 412,602 412,602 579,793 468,332 July 7 7,272,170 100.00% 742,168 791,988 803,681 779,279 August 8 6,492,891 89.28% 869,137 718,339 793,738 September 9 5,699,153 78.37% 1,030,357 1,102,184 1,390,778 1,174,440 October 10 4,524,713 62.22% 725,375 698,010 723,469 715,618 November Il 3,809,095 52.38% 650,779 589,037 647,065 724,159 652,760 December 12 3,156,335 43.40% 297,128 442,726 479,117 348,579 391,888 Total $6,136,821 $5,985,291 $6,644,990 $4,555,214 $7,272,170 n 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan Table 16 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan Sources and Uses--Water Fund Descrition FY2011 I FY2012 I FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 I FY2016 I FY2017 I FY2018 I FY2019 FY2020 Interest Rate on Fund Balance 0.50% 1.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% Sources of Funds Beginning Water Fund Balance $2,410,162 $1,459,045 $4,639,350 $7,600,154 $3,807,791 $5,963,766 $8,463,326 $1,223,695 $1,292,348 $4,921,363 User Charge Revenues-Water 8,921,806 11,567,215 13,226,185 15,123,085 16,332,035 17,085,415 17,873,549 18,698,037 19,050,864 19,108,017 Non-Rate Revenues(net of related expenses) Developer Overhead 10,000 10,030 10,060 10,090 10,121 10,151 10,181 10,212 10,243 10,273 Miscellaneous Fees/Charges 2,500 2,508 2,515 2,523 2,530 2,538 2,545 2,553 2,561 2,568 Other Utility Sales 4,443 4,456 4,470 4,483 4,497 4,510 4,524 4,537 4,551 4,564 Leaks/Misreads Credits (22,915) (22,984) (23,053) (23,122) (23,191) (23,261) (23,331) (23,401) (23,471) (23,541) Meter Sales 27,679 27,762 27,845 27,929 28,013 28,097 28,181 28,266 28,350 28.435 Fire Hydrant Flow Testing Srvc 2,000 2,006 2,012 2,018 2,024 2,030 2,036 2,042 2,049 2,055 Late Penalties/Charges 120,774 121,136 121,500 121,864 122,230 122,597 122,964 123,333 123,703 124,074 Retuned Check Fees 1,286 1,290 1,294 1,298 1,302 1,305 1,309 1,313 1,317 1,321 Bad Debt (20,483) (20,544) (20,606) (20,668) (20,730) (20,792) (20,854) (20,917) (20,980) (21,043) Miscellaneous Fees&Charges 420 421 423 424 425 426 428 429 430 431 Transfers In Rate Stabilization to Water Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interest Earnings-Water Fund 9,673 30,492 122,395 114,079 97,716 144,271 96,870 25,160 62,137 132,562 Total Sources of Funds $11,467,345 $13,182,833 $18,114,390 $22,964,157 $20,364,761 $23,321,053 $26,561,728 $20,075,260 $20,534,102 $24,291,081 Uses of Funds Net O&M Expenditures $5,917,238 $6,404,585 $6,771,008 $7,159,104 $7,570,177 $8,005,617 $4,962,763 $5,241,189 $5,536,056 $5,848,365 Water(Operating)Fund Capital Outlays 417,100 249,652 266,699 284,949 304,490 325,416 347,830 371,840 397,565 425,131 Transfers Out Water Fund to CIP Fund(Cap.Reserves) 3,586,747 0 0 6,710,886 0 0 11,924,720 3,491,135 0 3,277 Water Fund to Debt Service Fund 87,216 1,768,1 10 3,355,029 4,879,563 6,404,098 6,404,098 7,979,756 9,555,415 9,555,415 9,555,415 Water Fund to Rate Stabilization 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ending Water Fund Balance 1,459,045 4,639,350 7,600,154 3,807,791 5,963,766 8,463,326 1,223,695 1,292,348 4,921,363 8,334,820 Total Uses of Funds $11,467,345 $13,182,833 $18,114,390 $22,964,157 $20,364,761 $23,321,053 $26,561,728 $20,075,260 $20,534,102 $24,291,081 n m 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan Table 17 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan Sources and Uses--CIP Fund(Cap.Reserves) Descri tion FY2011 I FY2012 I FY2013 I FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 I FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Interest Rate on Fund Balance 0.50% L00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 200% 100% 2.00% 2,00% 2.00 Sources of Funds Beginning CIP Fund(Cap.Reserves)Balance $2,290,176 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Transfers In Water Fund to CIP Fund(Cap.Reserves) $3,586,747 $0 $0 $6,710,886 $0 $0 $11,924,720 $3,491,135 $0 $3,277 Rental Income 66,492 66,691 66,892 67,092 67,294 67,495 67,698 67,901 68,105 68,309 Interest Earnings 5,725 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Sources of Funds $5,949,140 $66,691 $66,892 $6,777,979 $67,294 $67,495 $11,992,418 $3,559,036 $68,105 $71,586 Uses of Funds Transfers Out CIP Fund(Cap.Reserves)to Construction Fund 5,949,140 66,691 66,892 6,777,979 67,294 67,495 11,992,418 3,559,036 68,105 71,586 Ending CIP Fund(Cap.Reserves)Balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Uses of Funds $5,949,140 $66,691 $66,892 $6,777,979 $67,294 $67,495 $11,992,418 $3,559,036 $68,105 $71,586 J 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan Table 18 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan Sources and Uses--Bond Proceeds Fund [Description FY2011 I FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 I FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Interest Rate on Fund Balance 0.50% 1.00% 2.00% 2.00% 100% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00 Sources of Funds Beginning Bond Proceeds Fund Balance $0 ($0) $23,653,755 $889,069 $8,980 $9,162 $9,347 $94 $1 $0 Bond Proceeds 2,097,054 44,147,727 0 40,000,000 0 0 41,341,374 0 0 0 Transfers In Interest Eamings 0 118,269 245,428 8,980 181 185 94 1 0 0 Total Sources of Funds $2,097,054 $44,265,996 $23,899,184 $40,898,049 $9,162 $9,347 $41,350,815 $95 $1 $0 Uses of Funds Issuance Costs, $41,941 $882,955 $0 $800,000 $0 $0 $826,827 $0 $0 $0 Transfers Out Bond Proceeds Fund to Debt Service Fund 209,705 4,414,773 0 4,000,000 0 0 4,134,137 0 0 0 Bond Proceeds Fund to Construction Fund 1,845,407 15,314,514 23,010,115 36,089,069 0 0 36,389,756 94 1 0 Ending Bond Proceeds Fund Balance (0) 23,653,755 889,069 8,980 9,162 9,347 94 1 0 0 Total Uses of Funds $2,097,054 $44,265,996 $23,899,184 $40,898049 $9,162 $9,347 $41,350,815 $95 $1 $0 C7 Co 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan Table 19 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan Sources and Uses--Debt Service Fund IDescription FY2011 I FY2012 I FY2013 FY2014 I FY2015 I FY2016 I FY2017 I FY2018 I FY2019 I FY2020 Interest Rate on Fund Balance 0.50% 1.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00 Sources of Funds Beginning Debt Service Fund Balance $o $219,302 $4,624,478 $4,624,478 $8,624,478 $8.624,478 $8,624,478 $12,758,615 $12,758,615 $12,758,615 Transfers In Water Fund to Debt Service Fund $87,216 $1,768,110 $3,355,029 $4,879,563 $6,404,098 $6,404,098 $7,979,756 $9,555,415 $9,555,415 $9,555,415 Bond Proceeds Fund to Debt Service Fund 209,705 4,414,773 0 4,000 000 0 0 4,134,137 0 0 0 Interest Earnings 548 24,219 92,490 132,490 172,490 172,490 213,831 255,172 255,172 255,172 Total Sources of Funds $297,469 $6,426,404 $8,071,997 $13,636,531 $15,201,065 $15,201,065 $20,952,203 $22,569,203 $22,569,203 $22,569,203 Uses of Funds Total Debt Service $78,167 $1,801,926 $3,447,518 $5,012,053 $6,576,587 $6,576,587 $8,193,587 $9,810,587 $9,810,587 $9,810,587 Transfers Out Ending Debt Service Fund Balance 219,302 4,624,478 4,624,478 8,624,478 8,624,478 8,624,478 12,758,615 12,758,615 12,758,615 12,758,615 Total Uses of Funds $297,469 $6,426,404 $8,071,997 $13,636,531 $15,201,065 $15,201,065 $20,952,203 $22,569,203 $22,569,203 $22,569,203 (7 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan Table 20 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan Sources and Uses--Construction Fund Descrition FY2011 I FY2012 I FY2013 I FY2014 I FY2015 FY2016 I FY2017 FY2018 I FY2019 F1'2020 Interest Rate on Fund Balance 0.50% 1.00% 200% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00 Sources of Funds Begiruting Construction Fund Balance $0 ($251) $67,025 $135,947 $460,409 $1,185,142 $1,952,638 $2,356,604 $104,234 $52,775 Transfers In CIP Fund(Cap.Reserves)to Construction Fund 5,949,140 66,691 66,892 6,777,979 67,294 67,495 11,992,418 3,559,036 68,105 71,586 Bond Proceeds Fund to Construction Fund 1,845,407 15,314,514 23,010,115 36,089,069 0 0 36,389,756 94 1 0 Reimbursement SDC Account to Construction Fund 0 258,575 267,131 278,649 290,665 303,198 316,272 329,910 344,136 358,975 Improvement SDC Account to Construction Fund 0 311,643 321,955 335,838 350,319 365,425 381,182 397,619 0 0 Interest Earnings 0 334 2,030 5,964 16,456 31,378 43,092 24,608 1,570 528 Total Sources of Funds $7,794,547 $15,951,506 $23,735,148 $43,623,445 $1,185,142 $1,952,638 $51,075,359 $6,667,871 $518,046 $483,863 Uses of Funds Capital Improvements Projects $7,794,798 $15,884,480 $23,599,201 $43,163,036 $0 $0 $48,718,755 $6,563,637 $465,270 $483,881 Transfers Out Ending Construction Fund Balance (251) 67,025 135,947 460,409 1,185,142 1,952,638 2,356,604 104,234 52,775 (18) Total Uses of Funds $7,794,547 $15,951,506 $23,735,148 $43,623,445 $1,185,142 $1,952,638 $51,075,359 $6,667,871 $518,046 $483,863 C7 N O 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan Table 21 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan Sources and Uses--Reimbursement SDC Account Descri tion FY2011 I FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Interest Rate on Account Balance 0,50% 1.00% 2.00% 2,00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% Sources of Funds Beginning Reimbursement SDC Account Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Reimbursement Fee Receipts 0 258,575 267,131 278,649 290,665 303,198 316,272 329,910 344,136 358,975 Transfers In Interest Earnings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Sources of Funds $0 $258,575 $267,131 $278,649 $290,665 $303,198 $316,272 $329,910 $344,136 $358,975 Uses of Funds Transfers Out Reimbursement SDC Account to Construction Fund 0 258,575 267,131 278,649 290,665 303,198 316,272 329,910 344,136 358,975 Ending Reimbursement SDC Account Balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Uses of Funds $0 $258,575 $267,131 $278,649 $290,665 $303,198 $316,272 $329,910 $344,136 $358,975 C7 N 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan Table 22 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan Sources and Uses--Improvement SDC Account Descrition FY2011 I FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Interest Rate on Fund Balance 0.50% 1.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% Sources of Funds Beginning Improvement SDC Account Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $418,954 Improvement Fee Receipts 0 311,643 321,955 335,838 350,319 365,425 381,182 397,619 414,764 432,649 Transfers In Interest Eamings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,190 12,834 Total Sources of Funds $0 $311,643 $321,955 $335,838 $350,319 $365,425 $381,182 $397,619 $418,954 $864,436 Uses of Funds Transfers Out Itnprovement SDC Account to Construction Fund 0 311,643 321,955 335,838 350,319 365,425 381,182 397,619 0 0 Ending Improvement SDC Account Balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 418,954 864,436 Total Uses of Funds $0 $311,643 $321,955 $335,838 $350,319 $365,425 $381,182 $397,619 $418,954 $864,436 0 N N 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan Table 23 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan Sources and Uses--Rate Stabilization IDescription FY2011 I FY2012 I FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 I FY2016 FY2017 I FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Interest Rate on Fund Balance 0.50% 1.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 100% 2.00% 2.00% Sources of Funds Beginning Rate Stabilization Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Transfers In Water Fund to Rate Stabilization $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Interest Earnings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Sources of Funds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 Uses of Funds Transfers Out Rate Stabilization to Water Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Ending Rate Stabilization Balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Uses of Funds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n N W 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan Table 24 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan Summary of Fund Balances [Description FY201] I FY2012 I FY2013 I FY2014 I FY2015 I FY2016 I FY2017 I FY2018 I FY2019 I FY2020 Beginning Fund Balances Water Fund $2,410,162 $1,459,045 $4,639,350 $7,600,154 $3,807,791 $5,963,766 $8,463,326 $1,223,695 $1,292,348 $4,921,363 CIP Fund(Cap.Reserves) 2,290,176 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bond Proceeds Fund 0 (0) 23,653,755 889,069 8,980 9,162 9,347 94 1 0 Debt Service Fund 0 219,302 4,624,478 4,624,478 8,624,478 8,624,478 8,624,478 12,758,615 12,758,615 12,758,615 Construction Fund 0 (251) 67,025 135,947 460,409 1,185,142 1,952,638 2,356,604 104,234 52.775 Reimbursement SDC Account 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Improvement SDC Account 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 418,954 Rate Stabilization 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals $4,700,338 $1,678,097 $32,984,609 $13,249,647 $12,901,658 $15,782,548 $19,049,790 $16,339,009 $14,155,199 $18,151,708 Ending Fund Balances Water Fund $1459,045 $4,639,350 $7,600,154 $3,807,791 $5,963,766 $8,463326 $1.223,695 $1,292,348 $4,921,363 $8,334,820 CIP Fund(Cap.Reserves) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bond Proceeds Fund (0) 23,653,755 889,069 8,980 9,162 9,347 94 1 0 0 Debt Service Fund 219,302 4,624,478 4,624,478 8,624,478 8,624,478 8,624,478 12,758,615 12,758,615 12,758,615 12,758,615 Construction Fund (251) 67,025 135,947 460,409 1,185,142 1,952,638 2,356,604 104,234 52,775 (18) Reimbursement SDC Account 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Improvement SDC Account 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 418,954 864,436 Rate Stabilization 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals $1678,097 $32,984,609 $13,249,647 $12,901,658 $15,782,548 $19,049,790 $16,339,009 $14,155,199 $18,151,708 $21,957,854 C) N A 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan Table 25 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan Debt Service Coverage Calculation (Including SDC Revenues) Description Include in Test FY2011 I FY2012 I FY2013 I FY2014 I FY2015 I FY2016 I FY2017 I FY2018 I FY2019FY2020 Estimated Gross Revenues User Charge Revenues-Water TRUE $8,921,806 $11,567,215 $13,226,185 $15,123,085 $16,332,035 $17,085,415 $17,873,549 $18,698,037 $19,050,864 $19,108,017 Developer Overhead TRUE 10,000 10,030 10,060 10,090 10,121 10,151 10,181 10,212 10,243 10,273 Miscellaneous Fees/Charges TRUE 2,500 2,508 2,515 2,523 2,530 2,538 2,545 2,553 2,561 2,568 Other Utility Sales TRUE 4,443 4,456 4,470 4,483 4,497 4,510 4,524 4,537 4,551 4,564 Leaks/Misreads Credits TRUE (22,915) (22,984) (23,053) (23,122) (23,191) (23,261) (23,331) (23,401) (23,471) (23,541) Meter Sales TRUE 27,679 27,762 27,845 27,929 28,013 28,097 28,181 28,266 28,350 28,435 Fire Hydrant Flow Testing Srvc TRUE 2,000 2,006 2,012 2,018 2,024 2,030 2,036 2,042 2,049 2,055 Late Penalties/Charges TRUE 120,774 121,136 121,500 121,864 122,230 122,597 122,964 123,333 123,703 124,074 Returned Check Fees TRUE 1,286 1,290 1,294 1,298 1,302 1,305 1,309 1.313 1,317 1,321 Bad Debt TRUE (20,483) (20,544) (20,606) (20,668) (20,730) (20,792) (20,854) (20,917) (20,980) (21,043) Water Fund Interest Earnings TRUE 9,673 30,492 122,395 114,079 97,716 144,271 96,870 25,160 62,137 132,562 CIP Fund(Cap.Reserves)Interest Earnings TRUE 5,725 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bond Proceeds Fund Interest Earnings TRUE 0 118,269 245,428 8,980 181 185 94 1 0 0 Debt Service Fund Interest Earnings TRUE 548 24,219 92,490 132,490 172,490 172,490 213,831 255,172 255,172 255,172 Construction Fund Interest Earnings TRUE 0 334 2,030 5,964 16,456' 31,378 43,092 24,608 1.570 528 Reimbursement SDC Account Interest Earnings TRUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Improvement SDC Account Interest Earnings TRUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,190 12,834 Rate Stabilization Interest Earnings TRUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reimbursement Fee Receipts TRUE 0 258,575 267,131 278,649 290,665 303,198 316,272 329,910 344,136 358,975 Improvement Fee Receipts TRUE 0 311,643 321,955 335,838 350,319 365,425 381,182 397,619 414,764 432,649 Transfer from Rate Stabilization TRUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CA oss Revenues $9,063,037 $12,436,406 $14,403,651 $16,125,500 $17,386,655 $18,229,537 $19,052,447 $19,858,447 $20,261,156 $20,429,444 Operating Expenses(excluding Dept.&Franchise Tax) Net O&M(less Capital Outlays) TRUE $5,912,554 $6,399,590 $6,765,682 $7,153,424 $7,564,120 $7,999,157 $4,955,875 $5,233,844 $5,528,223 $5,840,012 Transfer to Rate Stabilization TRUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operating Expenses $5,912,554 $6,399,590 $6,765,682 $7,153,424 $7,564,120 $7,999,157 $4,955,875 $5,233,844 $5,528,223 $5,840,012 Net Revenues $3,150,483 $6,036,817 $7,637,969 $8,972,077 $9,822,535 $10,230,379 $14,096,572 $14,624,603 $14,732,932 $14,589,432 Debt Service Coverage Test 1 Annual DS Subject to Coverage $78,167 $1,801,926 $3,447,518 $5,012,053 $6,576,587 $6,576,587 $8,193,587 $9,810,587 $9,810,587 $9,810,587 Estimated Coverage 40.30 3.35 2.22 1.79 1.49 1.56 1.72 1 49 1.50 1.49 Target Coverage 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35 Override Target Coverage Additional Revenues Required-Test 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Required Coverage 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Additional Bonds Test DS Subject to Coverage $156,334 $3,447,518 $3,447,518 $6576,587 $6,576,587 $6,576,587 $9,810,587 $9,810,587 $9,810,587 $9,810,587 Estimated Coverage 20.15 1.75 2.22 1.36 1.49 1.56 1.44 1.49 1.50 1.49 Target Coverage L15 L25 1.25 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 L15 Override Target Coverage 1.25 1.25 Additional Revenues Required to Meet Target $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 ro Required Coverage 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 n 10/21/2010 Water Financial Plan Table 26 City of Tigard Water Financial Plan Debt Service Coverage Calculation (Excluding SDC Revenues) Descri tion Include in Test FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 I FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Estimated Gross Revenues User Charge Revenues-Water TRUE $8,921,806 $11,567,215 $13,226,185 $15,123,085 $16,332,035 $17,085,415 $17,873,549 $18,698,037 $19,050,864 $19,108,017 Developer Overhead TRUE 10,000 10,030 10,060 10,090 10,121 10,151 10,181 10,212 10,243 10,273 Miscellaneous Fees/Charges TRUE 2,500 2,508 2,515 2,523 2,530 2,538 2,545 2,553 2,561 2,568 Other Utility Sales TRUE 4,443 4,456 4,470 4,483 4,497 4,510 4,524 4,537 4,551 4,564 Leaks/MisreadsCredits TRUE (22,915) (22,984) (23,053) (23,122) (23,191) (23,261) (23,331) (23,401) (23,471) (23,541) Meter Sales TRUE 27,679 27,762 27,845 27,929 28,013 28,097 28,181 28,266 28,350 28,435 Fire Hydrant Flow Testing Srvc TRUE 2,000 2,006 2,012 2,018 2,024 2,030 2,036 2,042 2,049 2,055 Late Penahies/Charges TRUE 120,774 121,136 121,500 121,864 122,230 122,597 122,964 123,333 123,703 124,074 Returned Check Fees TRUE 1,286 1,290 1,294 1,298 1,302 1,305 1,309 1,313 1,317 1,321 Bad Debt TRUE (20,483) (20,544) (20,606) (20,668) (20,730) (20,792) (20,854) (20,917) (20,980) (21,043) Water Fund Interest Earnings TRUE 9,673 30,492 ]22,395 114,079 97,716 144,271 96,870 25,160 62,137 132,562 CIP Fund(Cap.Reserves)Interest Earnings TRUE 5,725 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bond Proceeds Fund Interest Earnings TRUE 0 118,269 245,428 8,980 181 185 94 I 0 0 Debt Service Fund Interest Earnings TRUE 548 24119 92,490 132,490 172,490 172,490 213,831 255,172 255,172 255,172 Construction Fund Interest Earnings TRUE 0 334 2,030 5,964 16,456 31,378 43,092 24,608 1,570 528 Rate Stabilization Interest Earnings TRUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transfer from Rate Stabilization TRUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gross Revenues $9,063,037 $11,866,189 $13,814,565 $15,511,013 $16,745,671 $17,560,913 $18,354,993 $19,130,918 $19,498,067 $19,624,986 Operating Expenses(excluding Dept.&Franchise Tax) Net O&M(less Capital Outlays) TRUE $5,912,554 $6,399,590 $6,765,682 $7,153,424 $7,564,120 $7,999,157 $4,955,875 $5,233,844 $5,528,223 $5,840,012 Transfer to Rate Stabilization TRUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operating Expenses $5,912,554 $6,399,590 $6,765,682 $7,153,424 $7,564,120 $7,999,157 $4,955,875 $5,233,844 $5,528,223 $5,840,012 Net Revenues $3,150,483 $5,466,599 $7,048,883 $8,357,589 $9,181,551 $9,561,756 $13,399,118 $13,897,074 $13,969,843 $13,784,975 Debt Service Coverage Test 2 Annual DS Subject to Coverage $78,167 $1,801,926 $3,447,518 $5,012,053 $6,576,587 $6,576,587 $8,193,587 $9,810,587 $9,810,587 $9,810,587 Estimated Coverage 40.30 3.03 2.04 1.67 1.40 1.45 1.64 1.42 1.42 1.41 Target Coverage 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 125 1.25 1.25 1.25 Override Target Coverage . Additional Revenues Required-Test 2 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Required Coverage 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 L05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1,05 Additional Bonds Test DS Subject to Coverage $156,334 $3,447,518 $3,447,518 $6,576,587 $6,576,587 $6,576,587 $9,810,587 $9,810,587 $9,810,587 $9,810,587 Estimated Coverage 20.15 1.59 2.04 1.27 1.40 1.45 1.37 1 42 1.42 1,41 Target Coverage 1.15 1.25 1.25 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 L15 1.15 Override Target Coverage 1.25 L25 Additional Revenues Required to Meet Target $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Required Coverage 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 n N tT 10/21/2010