The URL can be used to link to this page

Resolution No. 06-10 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 06-1 U A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ENGINEERING STAFF TO ESTABLISH A PROPOSED LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (LID) AS A PROJECT IN THE FY 2005-06 CIP (CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM), DIRECTING THE PREPARATION OF A PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED LID IN THE TIGARD TRIANGLE AND AUTHORIZING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FUNDING MECHANISM FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE REPORT. WHEREAS, properties in the Tigard Triangle are zoned MUE (Mixed-Use Employment) and C-G (General Commercial); and WHEREAS, some of those properties ate currently residential in nature,but are in the process of converting to commercial;and WHEREAS, the Tigard Ttiangle Plan established guiding principles (adopted into the Development Code as Chapter 18.620) that when implemented would develop the Triangle into a high-quality mixed-use employment area;and WHEREAS, the Tigard TSP (Ttanspottation System Plan), adopted in 2002,identified the Tigard Triangle as an area where the street infrastructure needs to be significantly upgraded to meet those established standards. ; and WHEREAS, recent efforts to enhance this sparsely developed area have included the following LID's: Year Local Improvement District 1984 68th Avenue Sanitary Sewer Local Improvement District (LID 42) 1993 Combined Dartmouth Street LID and C.I.P.Phase 2 Project 1998 69th Avenue Local Improvement District(Specht Development, Inc.); and WHEREAS, the formation of an LID (Local Improvement District) for construction of street improvements would address some of the deficiencies identified in the TSP by upgrading the streets within the LID boundary to meet the current standards; and WHEREAS, Specht Development, Inc. has submitted a petition tequesting the formation of an LID to improve certain streets witivn the Tigard Triangle; and WHEREAS, the proposed LID boundary within the Tigard Triangle is defined as SW 68th Avenue, SW 69th Avenue, and SW 70th Avenue between SW Dartmouth Street and SW Baylor Street and SW Dartmouth Street and SW Clinton Street between SW 68th Avenue and SW 70th Avenue; and RESOLUTION NO. 06 - Page 1 WHEREAS, the Engineering staff prepared a Prelin-r.nary Evaluation Report (attached as Attachment 1.2),which was submitted in draft form to the City Council for discussion and direction during its February 21, 2006 meeting; and WHEREAS, tlae Preliminary Evaluation Report determines that the proposed LID appears feasible and recommends that the City Council take the next step in the LID formation process by authorizing the preparation of a Preliminary Engineer's Report; and WHEREAS, the proposed LID is not listed as a project in the FY 2005-06 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and there is currently no existing budget resource for the cost of preparing the Preliminary Engineer's Report; and WHEREAS, Specht Development, Inc. has agreed to deposit,in advance of any work, the amount needed for preparation of the Preliminary Engineer's Report with the understanding that the City include the cost of preparing the report in the total cost of the LID,if and when the City establishes the District;and WHEREAS, City Council discussed the proposed LID and indicated that the LID boundary and improvements to be constructed by the LID are satisfactory as submitted; and WHEREAS, the City Council has directed staff to prepare a resolution authorizing preparation of a Preliminary Engineer's Report and submit that resolution for adoption at a City Council business meeting. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The proposed LID in the Tigard Triangle is hereby added to the list of projects for the FY 2005-06 Capital Improvement Program. SECTION 2: The Engineering staff is directed to proceed with preparation of a Preliminary Engineer's Report,which includes "60% complete" engineering plans in sufficient detail to provide reliable cost estimates and to meet requirements for various pezilit applications. SECTION 3: The Preliminary Engineer's Repot should include the scope of work, location of the proposed improvements, financial information, the proposed district boundaries, estimated costs, proposed assessment methods, and other information that may be relevant to the feasibility of the proposed improvements and district. The report should recommend approval, approval with conditions, or denial. RESOLUTION NO. 06 Page 2 SECTION 4: The City staff is directed to proceed with the establishment of the funding mechanism in the amount of$70,000 to cover the anticipated expenses during the remainder of FY 2005-06 for preparation of the Preliminary Engineer's Report. A contingency transfer from the Gas Tax Fund is authorized as the funding source for the purpose of preparing the report. Any budget adjustments requiting Council action and necessary for the establishment of the project funding shall be brought to Council for appropriate action. SECTION 5: Before work begins on the preparation of the Preliminary Engineer's Report, Specht Development, Inc. will deposit an amount to cover the engineering contract and administrative costs for the preparation of that report. If the City establishes the LID, the cost of preparing the report shall be included in the total cost of the LID. In this case, Specht Development, Inc. will be refunded the amount deposited. If the City does not establish the LID, Specht Development, Inc. will be given the remaining balance of their deposit,less all actual costs incurred in preparing the report. SECTION 6: All costs incurred after the date of this resolution to prepare the Preliminary Engineer's Report and form the district shall be included as part of the LID costs and shall be reimbursed to the City if the LID is formed and the improvements are constructed. SECTION 7: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. L� PASSED: This ~day of IA- 006. Mayor- ty or Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder- City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 06 - Page 3 Attachment 1.1 Page 1 of 4 Preliminazy Evaluation Report Formation of a Local Improvement District in the Tigard Triangle Background It is proposed to develop a Local Improvement District (LID) including street and utility improvements to SW 68h Avenue, SW Wh Avenue, SW 7e Avenue, SW Dartmouth Street and SW Clinton Street, all within the Tigard Triangle, between SW Dartmouth Street and SW Baylor Street, and between SW Wh Avenue and SW 70th Avenue (Attachment 1.2; p. 8). The area consists of a transforming balance of residential to commercial zoning(Attachment 1.2; p. 9). Recent efforts to enhance this sparsely developed area have included the following LID's: (Note: In 1998, Specht Development, Inc. initiated a successful LID responsible for improvements to SW 69``'Avenue south of Dartmouth Street) Year Local Improvement District 1984 68'''Avenue Sanitary Sewer Local Improvement District (LID 42) 1993 Combined Dartmouth Street LID and C.I.P. Phase 2 Project 1998 69"'Avenue Local Improvement District (Specht Development,Inc): 2,750 lineal feet of partial/fall-width street improvements Specht Development, Inc. is the owner or contract purchaser of fifteen (15) of the twenty five (25) parcels within the proposed LID boundary (Attachment 1.2; p. 11). These parcels . comprise 59% of the land area (Attachment 1.2;p. 12) and 64% of the street frontage within the assessment district(Attachment 1.2;p. 13).The Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) 13.04.020 specifies that an LID may be initiated by written petition of "property owners owning at least fifty percent of the property benefited by the local improvement" (Attachment 1.2; pp. 2-4& 14). Current Proposal The proposed Local Improvement District in the Tigard Triangle will be for the express purpose of improving the following streets to partial of full standards as required by the City of Tigard(Attachment 1.2;p. 6) • SW 6e Avenue (between SW Dartmouth Street and SW Baylor Street) • SW 690'Avenue (between SW Dartmouth Street and SW Baylor Street) • SW 70" Avenue (between SW Dartmouth Street and SW Baylor Street) • SW Dartmouth Street(between SW 6e Avenue and SW 69''Avenue) • SW Clinton Street(between SW 68thAvenue and SW Avenue) The improvements to the aforementioned streets would include: • Asphalt Pavement • Water Improvements • Curb and Gutter • Storm Drainage • Sidewalks • Utility Undergrounding • Street Trees • Right-of-Way Acquisition, • Street Lighting if necessary • Street Signs • Tigard Triangle Portal • Sanitary Sewer Enhancement(s) P-p—d Mg�d zri-jrs LII]—PaGm rsap Er.lusriars + Attachment 1.1 Page 2 of 4 The LID would provide highly visible enhancesiients to the Tigard Triangle area, particularly SW Dartmouth Street and SW 68`" Avenue. Each of these streets, within the proposed district boundary, is at the Dartmouth St terminus of the previous LID'S. Consequently, an obvious visual difference is noticed on the north side of SW Dartmouth Street between. the I-5 On/Off Ramps and SW 69`' Avenue. It should also be noted that the I-5 Ramp intersection is a designated Tigard Triangle Portal. Therefore, consideration would be given to enhancements associated with that distinction such as the monument on SW 72"a Avenue at the northbound 217 on/off-ramp intersection (Attachment 1.2;p. 17). Cost Estimate Without the benefit of greater detail for the scope of work,we submit the following estimate for the total cost of the currently proposed LID.According to the Prebminaiy Engineer's Report on record,, the total LID cost for the 1998 SW 69`"Avenue LID project was $1,288,005.00. After evaluating that cost per lineal foot of street improvements, our estimate will use a cost of$500 for full width and$337 for partial width street improvements. These unit costs assume a similar scope of work. For the purpose Of.a preliminary evaluation,we will estimate the total LID cost based on the following values (Note:These costs do not reflect cost of.living increases and general inflation). Qua Unit Cost Item Cost Work Item Description O � Partial Street Improvements: 2,015 lineal feet $337/LF $679,500.00 Full Street Improvements: 1,220 lineal feet $500/LF $610,000.00 Sub Total: $1,289,500.00 Ancillary.Costs Portion of Sub Total Item.Cost City of Tigard Administrative/Construction Services: 8% $100,000.00 Preliminary Engineer's Report and 60% Complete Construction Drawings 10% $125,000...00 Completion of Final Construction Drawings 6% $75,000.00 Total LID Cost: $1,589,500.00 The 25 parcels within the proposed LID boundary combine for a total of 297,525 square feet (Attachment 1.2;p. 14). When consideration is given to the general feasibility of.a proposed LID, a ratio of 3:1 of land value ($15/square foot) to the total cost of the ID is favorable. In this cage, the ratio is approximately 2.81:1. 297,525 SF x $15/SF = $4,462,875.00 Estimated LID Cost = $1,589,500.00 The Local improvement District (LID) formation process. The LID process has several steps in it. The basic concept of any LID is that the benefited properties pay for the improvements. The following is the LID process,in accordance with our City Municipal Code: • preliminary Evaluation Report • Preliminary Engineer's Report • Declaration of intention to form the district Prop—a rs.,a T&.&un-P Ari—y e.m-eon K" Attachment 1.1 Page 3 of 4 • District formation • Construction of Improvements • Spreading of assessments by ordinance We are currently preparing the PreliminaLy Evaluation Report,which should provide sufficient* formation for Council to make a decision on whether or not to proceed with in directing staff to prepare a Preliminaiy Engineer's Report for the purpose of evaluating the feasibility of forming the LID. The Preliminary Engineer's Report will also have the proposed methodology for distributing the costs, the proposed LID Boundary, and the benefited properties that would be included in the LID. An LID could be formed through Council initiative, or at the request of the property owners that want the improvements. For this particular LID, Specht Development, Inc. has submitted a formal"Petition for and Consent to Create a Local Improvement District. Specht Development, Inc. has agreed to deposit,in advance,the cost of preparing the Preliminary Engineer's Report with the understanding that the City include the cost of prepatng the report in the total cost of the LID,if and when the City establishes the District. The total cost of the LID would also include the City's contribution for the design and construction.management,plus the costs to establish the LID and construct the improvements.The LID formation is contingent upon 50% of the properties by area approving the LID formation. In this case, Specht Development, Inc. is the owner or contract purchaser of fifteen (15) of the twenty five (25)parcels within the proposed LID boundary.These parcels comprise 59% of the land area. The Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) 13.04.020 specifies that an LID maybe initiated by written petition of"property owners owning at least fifty percent of the property benefited by the local improvement" Council;dor the property owners, could withdraw at anytime if the costs prove to be exorbitant, or if construction of the improvements does not appear feasible. The property owners could stop tie LID formation if two-fliitds of them (by area) remonstrate against the LID fomation.. Since there is one major property owner for this LID,if Specht Development, Inc. decides it does not want to proceed,we would terminate the LID process. The City would provide the interim financing to design and construct the project,and then issue bonds after the project is completed and the total costs are known. The benefited property owners would be assessed their shale of the LID costs with repayment over a 1Q- year period, or longer, or all at once,if they choose. If Council moves to proceed with establishing the Local Improvement District in the.Tigard estimated time line can be expected. It should be noted that the Triangle, the Following attached schedule does not include the necessary time to select a consultant to prepare the Prehmina.ty Engineer's Report. (Attachment 1.2;p. 15-16). Issues To Be Resolved Some of the major issues that need to be resolved for the successful implementation of the improvements in the proposed LID are: • Acquisition of Right of Way along SW 70''Avenue,if necessary. • Connection to existing improvements and infrastructure. (Particularly, Storm and Sanitary Sewer). Pmimed TFTd T6 ng1c LID—P,bminaryy Gv➢=6-Report Attachment 1.1 Page 4 of 4 Recommendations The LID appears feasible.To comprehensively address the roadway improvement deficiencies in the Tigard Triangle, staff recon-Anends the following: • That Council direct staff to proceed with the next step in the LID process. This would require a resolution directing staff to proceed with the preparation of Prelim4iaiy Engineer's Report.This report would examine the overall scope of work and associated cost assessment per tax lot owner within.the LID boundary. Specht Development, Inc. has agreed to deposit,in advance, the cost of preparing the Preliminary Engineer's Report with the understanding that the City include the cost of preparing the report in the LID,if and when the City establishes the District. P.p..d T.V d T k.d.LID-Pmlimi—y RV-" Attachment 1.2 Page 1 of 18 DDC January 25,2006 Dcsign Group cflw-c�rs:r--� Gus Duenas,City Engineer Engineering Department: City of Tigard 1312.5 5W Hall 131vd. Tigard,Oregon 97223 RE: Proposed Local Improvement District in Tigard'Triangle area Dear Mr. Duenas= On behalf of Specht Development, Inc., I am submitting ten (10) copies of a petition requesting the City Council to form a Local Improvement District (LID) and make public street and utility improvements to certain streets within the Tigard Triangle area. Specht Development, Inc. is the owner or contract purchaser of 15 out of the 25 parcels within the proposed LID boundary, these parcels represent 59%of the land area and 64%of the street frontage within the proposed assessment district, This is significantly more than the minimum required by Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) 13.04.020, which requires "property owners owning at least fifty percent of the property benefited by the local Improvement"to initiate a Local Improvement District by written petition. The proposed LID would include street and utility improvements to SW 68t" Avenue,SW 6911 Avenue,SW 701"Avenue, SW Dartmouth Street and SW Clinton Street, all within the "'Tigard Triangle", between SW Dartmouth Street and SW Baylor Street, and between SW 68t"Avenue and SW 70th Avenue. These streets are currently substandard, or, in the case of SW 70th Street, non-e)astent. This LID would make improvements similar to the Improvements made to SW 691i Avenue south of Dartmouth Street. As you know, Specht Development, Inc. initiated a successful LID for those improvements In 1998. We respectfully request that your office prepare a Preliminary Evaluation Report for the City Council's consideration, and schedule this matter before the City Council at the earliest possible date. If the City Council adopts a Resolution directing that a Preliminary Engineer's Report be prepared, Specht Development, Inc.will pay In advance the cost of preparing that report,in accordance with TMC 13.04.030,with the understanding that the.City will include the cost of preparing the report in the LID, If and when the City establishes the District. Thank you, Gus. Inc el , Ed Murphy \` r=x�ra,�r,47rl �a�OaE5e ra Comprehensive Planning manager F F_IItl3Ls:iy,�:dt::3net++n Project File# 1017.001 c:c: - Cea;;ris:m Attachment 1.2 Page 2 of 18 PETITION FOR AND CONSENT TO CREATE A LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT THE HONORABLO HAYOFt A"D CITY COUNCIL city of Tigard county of Washington state of Oregon in the matter of the improvement of lands described as. Street and udilty improvements to SW 6e Avenue,SW W Avenue,SW 7&Avenue,SW Oarbnoutft Street and SW CAnton Street, all within the '779ard Triangle" between SW Dartmouth Street and Sty Saylor Street,and between SW 681 Avenue and SW 7Oe4 Avenue. We, the undersigned petitioners, hereby request that the City of Tigard Investigate the feasibility of forming a local Improvement District(LID) and draft a PmIIminary Evaluation Report for the city Council's consideration. The evaluation would review the feasibility and estimated costs of maklog public improvements to these streets through the,creation of an assessment dlstrtM if the Preliminary Evaluation Report determines that the LED is feaslble,we request that the City Council direct the engineering staff to proceed to the next step and prepare a Prelininary Engineering Report. The UD would be for the express purpose of. Improving the following streets to partial or hull city, street standards, Including streetsr ' curbs, gutters, sid"alksl street trees, street lights and signage; sanitary sewer; water, Including fine hydrants; storm drainage fadlit!",' undergrounding of overhead utilities; aequlsition of additional right of-way or easements acquisition, if necessary; street and utility engineering design and related professional service: SW 68h Avenue,between SW Dartmouth Street and SW Baylor Street; • SW Wh Avenue between SW Dartmouth Street and SW Baylor Street; • SW 70h Avenue between SW Dartmouth St and SW Baylor Street; • SW Dartmouth Street between 5W 6e and SW 69th Avenues; SW Clinton Street between SW 60P and SWW,0'Avenues. The area hereby to be improved by the creation of an assessment district comprises approximately 10 acres,counting existing right-ref-ways. The area and the proposed LID are more specifically explained in the exhibits attached to this petition, which ace all by reference herein made a part of this petition,and which include the following. Exhibit'MIS a list of the properties to be included in the ISTD; n Exhibit'W is a narrative description of the proposed improvements; Exhibit 'C' Includes maps (Figures 1-6) Which illustrate the general location, the proposed boundary,the property ownerships,and the parcel size and parcel frontage of each parcel wit.'�in the LID; i Attachment 1.2 Page 3 of 18 G Exhibit `D' provide$ detail on the area. and frontage caiculations, including the percentage of the area and frontage which is owned by Specht Deveibprnent, Inc„ which is summarized on Figures 5 and 6 of Exhibit'C'. We hereby declare that we,the undersigned petitioners: (1) Are in fact the owner or the contract purchaser of the Indicated properties; (2) Represent at least fifty percent(50%) of the property benefited by the proposed local improvement district; (3) Understand that the cost.of these improvements would be borne by the benefited property owners if a local improvement district were forged; (4) State that by signing this petition we are only acknowledging an interest In having a preliminary engineering report completed, and are not committed to supporting any local improvement district that may be proposed as a result of the. City's evaluation and report. WHEREFORE,petitioners request thatsaid preliminary investigation be accomplished,and a preliminary Evaluation Report be delivered to the City council regarding the feasibility of creating an assessment district,and further that, if the LID appears to be feasible,the City Council of the City of Tigard, Oregon, direct staff to prepare a Preliminary Engineering Report and expedite the study as much as possible. SIONATURE COMPANY ADDRESS TAX LOT# (WCTM 1s135DD) e/ A $� CNsv4a;!rr��►!C. ,s�tcs� -su►� dt vias ,2100 2200 „ 2300 }v� f ! 2500 f ` 2900 3000 e r i1 3041 3100 ` 6140 + " 6200 1 rti 6340 a.. e 6600 2 Attachment 1.2 Page 4 of 18 SW V40AW-O ! � e,CIA t' p �ufC��a�.4�L. 4f-Y7arc 6700. 6800 3 Attachment 1.2 Page 5 of 18 EXHIBIVA' PROPERTIES INCLUDED WITHIN THE PROPOSED LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT The following tax lots,all on Washington County Tax Assessor's Map IS136DD: 2100 Pollock,Donald E&Julia Gall/Specht Development, Inc. 2200 Pollock, Donald E j Specht Development,Inc. 2300 Carpenter,Richard L/Specht Development,Inc. 2500 Dickey,Velda A/Specht Development,Inc, 2900 Specht Development,Inc. 3000 Specht Development,Inc. 3001 Specht Development,Inc. 3100 Specht Development,Inc. 6100 Specht Development,Inc. 6200 Specht Development,Inc. 6300 Specht Development,Inc. 6500 Specht Development,Inc. 6600 Specht Development,Inc. 6700 Specht Development, Inc. 6800 Specht Development, Inc. 1900 John Carl Coon&Mary G.Olsen,Trustee 2000 Paul B. Wagar 3r.&Kaneko T TRS 2400 Sternberg Family Limited Partner 2700 Lavida E.Miller 2800 Glenn L.and Sharon L. Moore 32.90 Judy Lorraine Strojny&Diane Louise Baldwin 6900 J.T.Jr.and Theresa A.Roth 7001 ]acob T.Jr.and Theresa A.Roth 7300 Kenneth and Marilyn Rosenfeld 7601 Marzle Salarle 4 Attachment 1.2 Page 6 of 18 RX"18rr Ir NARRATIVE DFSCRlpnoN OF THE PROPOSED PR039CT The proposed project Mould Improve the public streets and utilities to partial or full city standards. Specifically,the project would Improve: • Partfat street improvements to SW 68th Avenue, between SW Dartmouth Street and SW Baylor Street, along the west side of the street only(Pacific IOW Properties Is E Improving the east side ,of the street as a condition of development), and not Including tax lot 2600(IS136DD),which is already developed; • Full street and utility improvements to SIN 6911 Avenue between SW Dartmouth Street and SW Saylor Street, along both sides (except that portion between 5W Dartmouth Street and SW Clinton 5trt:et along the west sada of SW 694h Avenue, which Is being developed by Pacific NW Properties as a condition of development); • Partial street Improvements to SW 7411 Avenue between Sw Dartmouth St and SW Saylor Street, along the east side of the street only,and not including tax lot:7500 (1S13600),which Is already,being developed by Pacific NW Properties as a condition of development; • Partial Street Improvements to SW Dartmouth Street between 5W",t'and SW C' Avenues,on the north side of SW Dartmouth Street only; • Full street and utility Improvements to 5W Clinton Street between SW 6s' and SW 700 Avenues. The street standards assumed in this proposed local Improvement district are as follows: r SW 68*Avenue would be 44-feet%vide In a 70-foot wide right-cf-way; • SW 69"t Avenue would be 36-feet wide In a 60-foot wide right-of way; • SW 70th Avenue would be a I 11 street Improvement,Le.,Is-feet wide in a 304bot wide right-of-way,with curbs,sidewalks,landscape strip and street trees on the east side only; • SW Dartmouth Avenue would be 5e-feet wide In a 94-foot wide right-of-way. There,appears to be enough right-of-way available for the proposed Improvements, therefore it should not be necessary for the City to acquire additional right-of-gray or easements. However,1f there Is a need to acquire for additional right-of-way or public easements,the costs of such"uisftfons would be added to the UD. In addition to any r[ght-of gray acquisition and constriction costs, other costs will be folded into the local Improvement district, including but not limited to city,staff and consultant time and materials for survey, engineering design, project admInlstmtlon, legal services and financing costs. S Attachment 1.2 Page 7of18 EXHIBIT`C' SUPPORTING ILLUSTRATIONS The following figures Illustrate the percentage of the property area and property frontage owned by Specht Development, Inc. Figura I..This figure Illustrates the location or the proposed Local Improvement District, which Is within the"Tigard'Triangle",generally north of Dartmouth street,between I-5 and SW 721"Avenue; Figure 2-This figure Is an aerial photograph which shows the proposed LID boundary and the parcels that would be Included.in the assessment district, Figure 3--This figure shows the ownerships of the properties In and adjacent to the proposed LID boundary; Figure 4-'this figure Illustrates the proposed local improvement district boundary,and the areas where street and utility improvements would be made. All public Improvements made as part of the LID project would be within this boundary; Figure 5-This figure shows the total land area, In square footage,of the parcels within the proposed LID,and the percentage of the square footage owned by Specht Development, Inc. Figure 6-This figure shows the total street frontage of the parcels within the proposed LID, and the percentage of the street frontage of parcels owned by Specht Development,Inc. 6 Attachment 1.2 Page S of 18 FIGURE I r Metz r legend a Proposed L.I.D.Boundary 3 r ^ , E �r p F f Q9w ." off V . ro 4 � 514 PFAPFLI STQ 21 AE C' o ( - o f M c m f � P V ql m Figure 1: Location Map a DDC Specht LID aI1,300FL �' tresign�mup: City of t igard, Washington County, Oregon P ed N, "' cw�aava 1Q47.Qp104 Q arxpiwrtf�ue�uv�e�nr.>: Spt><tei:: erase5ryo.om-.sou�n:.C I]rawrl fay:G►H�yeids.t+s McirsWtsRtr+aufoeCcfitG.RL15LgiE[kt80ikC,fA7v8q'DEi7 ES r�.r.euw_xio I II1 t � IT Legend Proposed L.I.D.Boun ry# 44, ' t Jo ! rti iL } !n�•t �. ILZ LDC Figure 2: Aerial Photograph QDC Specht �� i'r- /. (q {} rJ(i -�' �1 _ � .`iie r• I 'f'.. yif� u tp �i i. "I� •�e� 1/ LID et OV51grk Grovp City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregul I 1• +t +1 Attachment 1..2 Page 10 of 18 FIGURE 3 y Legend " r Proposed L.I.D.Boundary u ' r E I � �rsexae�wi4 I ' I f ti :NL�lh1�l6T V-7Ur.CA 511 -- ... ..-:.,-..- - i { .� : r El Ewr`Y Ir wS171G1bA1lj 4 rCM.n+rarviCef '1 I i ? ! ! .:CDiFC-., i 'SSrle �et'.9�betrlM � 1 hQtH.*CYw e 5 i 4:lbeew[ Wsa.*Wrie 7i�]M70eYe1 > r ae,rwoereTr , , .arse■r " i p ksv� _ � s � MtlMw4Y Sa KtrlOenf/e .{ ..• � •• Wllr''ProMIT:Na1LLC �� I ryrfKBeNM' _ —.,,.�•--� r }►+xgcArlmwvarsaarwe4 E E._ ergine- '_i o a> eir«c; tTt7eaexere I 4 T SNC1,r'�.Li.Yy'3ESi r i W f�" E r! v r er 7 B -Date.. Figure 3: Ownerships Scale, trs QLLLD Specht Lil] zaa� es De,ignGrroup City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon rQj-ci�`,ao d $OSiFk'�!. �„' C4St+1"k TAlALC1.9„[pVK Data DMWn By:CES �,ip;rgpyWRGdxtGCertfef.RLl53.lIRtaSC.Npv6rid4r',�'J5 p Nxarri+iisx Attachment 1.2 Page 11 of 18 FIGURE 4 E $ i LEGEND AwC1 Boundary E � ImprovomontAross a CL 4 40 N SW BAYLOR ST S7 t�1 tti19GPP 1 Mao WACAW roup 2M WW610 GOpK M mum g 0 16�rp�b l511shb P OKr 2500 snoprte v 1S1Ypp' 10MM pICiSEY1 lwo �P [,j S-Rw" 7517GpD 24M E'TFAHBERO FMU�.Y + - ARTM 1517640 p � SPEGtfi` rxssao t9rw44 'S cre� ,wt rs�r7644 seEcirT ' a OKCRT SPKHt n m SW CUNTON ST ISOM ISO= 1. Vot 7Cut ROTH 3 0RM Q � t6176b0 15i56t0 p 7ri7r s�:1tT p SHAR1E ISIMOD FO SK tSr?D6D OtDD co SPEWT F 1S33M RdSENFE7A 11 181 M El E6p6 ISIYAM 630 z enr o ` t M3= ew 10 EceT SW DMTMDUM ST NORTH e A Data: Figure 4; Improvement District Scmle: tx Q..C, Specht UD ;` ,soft. Quo City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon p,ojedN, .rr..w�r soa�+s: 3p17tr01:QS1 rte» o s�maa �.twaoataR�aurc�Ca:t+�r,RuSt�n�cxc�Har«ra»r prawn By: CED Q ►utmwueos ...q�,.,,rrxm•zafw+t-��Y�+•F�+�v��arhrc Attachment 1.2 Page 12 of 18 FIGURE 5 E $ LEGEND C i Properties Owned By Others 123,35B1sgX or 41% Properoas Owned By Specht =174.167sq.11,er 59% TOW ;;297.525eq.1t,(100%) SW SAYLOR S7 Iwo .tri.q ' ' �treaoras. ;9o.oeow�' U f�l r�fr r 35Aa � �`ri��f,':t8i76aR ' Wj tstaco� r Uj 2290 Zo ' OtaAw w �isf +stxco T f lfi�/ 4 S R,taa "' 4 rf /!�♦ Fi>,lilyClt i SW CLINTON S7 q tsin aeoo .�' arae fr �fr mr000awi' Yr . teaea.aA. r� - +^fst3aoR! aaoaas%' £ f12MO wm ts138G9 t fr3 s r saa*4 .. s i= ro !�r , ' rt9 ra9eeto r17J�tSl. pF% t�r 16135W csoa 2.7meni< m a � SW CAR7MOU-M ST NORTH Data, Figure 5. Parcel square rootage 01120rZ5M LQ Specht LID -Acple: . a tiealnnCitrxrp City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon Projectt iw.:w+rr so�rcae 1017.6pi.00 Drawn By. CE8 U „« a�w•ra+ Metro bal�.fia ossa!Caller,Rl IS Lioe lite Dice.tdd�i p rwe�m►a�wo ryq ru.rrm,�w.•mn n,.�:.., ,h.mrp.+sau.t i 1 Attachment 1.2 Page 13 of 18 FIGdRIE G LEGEND ...�.- Street Frontage By Others s 1,352 Fedor 38X+ M, Street Frontage By Specht=2,449 Foot or 64% Total m 5,795 feet(900%) propetties Owned By Othm i. Properties Awned 13Y Specht v SW 13AYLOR ST g , 59156D0 ' � 15i9it]P C Lu75 0'' , '1000 7,10D rn uj SW CUNTON ST Yw isio aooa bt00 3: At � 1P'aePP�R F" 457b7Db',: tt 7�DD f ur i8_i56prD Cl t: $ - — - SWOARTMOMST NORTH e a rs pato, Figure 6: Linear Street Frontage 09=006 (LLD Specht LID 06 iahcisup City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon Prgedit o ,h..t«rs, Saurtex 1097.001.00 e] dmrwi�atsuerwfeurx iRL1$t3lafla!><Die4,Na,mttmr�OGS � ,�n��rrEN Melvot)et�►��loartt,?e5lar, erownsy: GtcB o rK .r fir.{N+.+.l�il�pnl"��S'4�S1NA�*M�Wq+l1[S/YMti: Attachment 1.2 Page 14 of 18 EXHISIET'D' 51 leg, B!i I in p IV n:10 9 ill;98!�g i� Tki.$'f. �' +L9 ldir-t4 -dd }"j fin ag &SS g CO 40 : X4Xlx,X11 XIX-.YC-3C5 x x XS MI X,X x XX, M U)LO 'CO 16N in t;8 aLn. to CD 0 8 r, :00 "IC,(n. CQ v- N Cq C4� t! 01 CLI 40 8 81 88. 8,8'RE 0a�S.7r R is vs CD 04 r.z 7 z z z 7-ZI 1 Oil CL 4 C;; IW CO, &122,01 koi > 1-3 0 0 2 , 01 p z r Vj (0 i 1 '6 CL, W�;2 �,W�w 1 1� -S V-61 NU.0 CL 0 %; Attachment 1.2 Page 15 of 18 Specht Triangle LID Tentative Schedule 12101105 PHASE 1: INITIATE LID 1, Develop tentative.LID boundar 11125105 2. Review with Cita'staff 11129105 3. Meet Nvith individual propertY MUM 12401-12109105 4. Revise boundary 12112105 5. A4cet svitlt City Engineer 12115105 6. Neighborllood meeting(optional) 1112(06 7. Submit petition to Gita'staff 1120106 S. Petition presclited to City Council 2114106 PHASE Il: FOILMATION OF LID 9. Council requests Engineering Report 2114106 1.0.specht deposits funds 2117106 11.preliminary Eltg.Report completed 4114106 12.Council adopts Report,calls for!tearing 519146 13.Pubic Hearing 6116106 14.Adoption of LID Ord,and assessment roll 6116106 PHASE 111: CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS 15.Complete Final construction draw-inns 7121106 16.Construction load 7425106 17.Advertise for bids 7128106 1 S.Award bid 9412106 PHASE IV: CONSTRUCTION 19.Construction stares 9WI06 20.Consinsction conultleted 12r_=2106 21.Acccplance of i1nlp]'0Wn1ents 1!31107 cjdJlolT.O�I ri��'.igfd sc7rnR�IG+i2�11 A11 1 Attachment 1.2 Page 16 of 18 22,Fitvit costs tabulated 2!28107 1'11ASE 8"'. 1?MAL ASSESSAIMT ROLL 23,11na1 enginceriug rptfassesslnent roll 3r301Q7 24.Council adapts final assessment roll 4124/07 pi.TASR vi.SALE OF BONDS 25.Sale ofwscssntent bands 6115/07 26.First assessment notice 1/15/08 ,jWI017Ao-Ffh i�huiXi.'b(!dal61V0IMS 2 Attachment Page 17 of 18 Tigard Triangle Portal ' AveOn/Off ' + Intersection s I { J l I 4 z.i itt- .i Attachment 1.2 Page 18 of 18 w x 'A F _ v _ f lid C9 Jy: ff 4 T AVM33U4 )13OQMHjj L MWAY X F p rk A L -T "A, 3rjNW i:, Rug Ms P-1 --4 -lit It X, I � j L I k r t 6 E, f X.0 tA Ms 7-1 r: v 3ns3Av Mr. 4!r: it IL r E'. It m'7 4-4 Sit r: 4n 7- 1 q. 4.'I j., 2 i Aq ,;7 7-� Attachment 1.3 Page I of I SPECHT 1-TE" C 1,";A7"( Februaiy 17,2006 City Engineer City of Tigard 13125 SW 11311 Blvd, Tipard,OR 97223 Tigard Triallgle 131) D c a r Gus; 111ank you ror die opportunity to lowl Willi you and Marco cabirtillas yesterday. Per your mquest,we havesuninvarized our agteement As it portains to the deposit for the PfelintinDrY Engineer's lKeP011; Speclit sliall have Ilse-opportunity to review mid discuss the scope Of tile ItOquesl f0YPJ`oV0saI for ,Ile prelintinary r.-Iijineoritia Repon. t The City of Tigard("tile City")Will Use its cOns"liint Proeegs to 5 'ccI a Q 0R5 uHAM to pmpliye.the Preliminary FngincurinS Report rind associated work for the LID. Igincering Spechl Will deposit fonds equal 10 the conoll.,11it's cost to prepare the Preliminary El Itepan, plus a reasonable estimated :mount for City Stairs jnV0lVCmC11t in the proje'el subsciiiiictit. to City Council approving, the resolution to prepare the Pfclilnillal U-nAineer'AA lkeport. ,) The deposit by 191MIlt Development,['to.will be held by the City,to mitigate the nsk Of f'1y1ng for the Preliminary Engineering Report should the TID not lv formed for imy reason.If COU061 forms the LTD' all costs to prepare the preliminary Engineering Report(fwm the date of the resolution) %vill bi; included in the Iji) m part or the LID costs mid will be Included in the OssessitIL,ilts.to benefited proirrty o1,v11c1,,5. As a mull,At the time the City Council forms thc LID,.the deposit money will be mtumcd to$Pechl- • Should.the City Council not fora(lie;LU),ally funds not used sliall be returned to Specht. Specht reserves the do)t to withdraw its support of the LID at au y tirui;. At thritt1luc,any unused funds fiviii die deposit will be reltimQ4 to SPccht- loak fonvird to ivorkhtg Willi the City on this project ajjd Are cNoited far the Chat=to provide tanvible,beiiefits;to lite community. Should you bave any'questions,please do not heshatc to-outlet'Ile, Best Regards, SpE�CI-JT DEVELOPMENT.INC, Todd Shaakr elli Cf opcnjting O)Tjccr C- NJawo Cabanilils I-M Mulpliy,LDC Design Group 02vg Spechi.Pete Kit-by 1-01 fmix fee MIA':