Loading...
Resolution No. 00-66 . v CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON RESOLUTION NO.00- (0(10 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY OF TIGARD WATER SERVICE AREA SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE AND THE METHODOLOGY USED TO ESTABLISH THE CHARGES WHEREAS, Tigard Municipal code chapter 3.24 defines the authority and process for imposing Water System Development Charges(SDCs); ` HIEREAS,Section S.B of the Intergovernmental Agreement for water within the Tigard Water Service Area states that Tigard City Council has the authority to modify, alter or repeal the rules, rates and regulations for water service within the Tigard Water Service Area; WHEREAS,The Intergovernmental Water Board(IWB)has recommended approval of the Tigard Water Service Area SDCs; WHEREAS,The purpose of the Water SDC is to ensure fair and equitable financing is available to support needed capital additions; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The water system development charge for new connections by meter size based on a 5/8" x 3/4"meter having a weighting factor of one equivalent dwelling unit shall be amended as follows: Meter Size 410 service area Bull Mountain system 5/8"x 3/4" $2,041 $2,763 1" 5,103 6,908 1 1/2" 7,348 9,947 2" 16,328 22,104 3" 30,615 41,445 4" 51,025 69,075 6" 102,050 138,150 1 8" 163,280 221,040 10" 293,496 397,319 12" 775,907 1,050,382 SECTION'2: The methodology used to establish the above system development charges,which is attached as Exhibit"A",is also hereby adopted. SECTION 3: The capital improvement plan required by state law as the basis for expending SDC revenue for water capital improvements shall be based upon the attached Exhibit`B", which was recommended by the IWB, approved by City Council on September 26, 2000,and is also hereby adopted. RESOLUTION NO.00- Page 1 SECTION 4: This level of SDC also supports the$40,000,000 water supply source program that was adopted by Council or,November 14,2000. SECTION 5: The City Council determines that the amended SDC fee schedule is not a tax subject to the property tax limitations of Article XI,Section 11 (b)of the Oregon Constitution. PASSED: This a _ day of ✓ 2000. ayor-City o Tig d ATTEST: City Recorder-City of Tigard h:`dccs\sdc\sdc resolution 2000.do I i i f RESOLUTION NO.00-A6 Page 2 x1-ll��T "A" TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM CH2MHILL Tigard Water System System Development Charge Update PREPARED FOR: Mike Miller,City of Tigard PREPARED 8Y: Art Griffith,CH2M HILL COPIES: Ed Wegner,City of Tigard Craig Prosser,City of Tigard DAM September 1,2000 Introduction The City of Tigard has authorized CH2M HILL to complete a System Development Charge (SDC)Update for the Tigard water system.The existing SDC was developed in 1996 and since that time,the City has continued planning for a long-term water source of supply project,has constructed additional storage facilities,and has completed a water system hydraulic analysis which has developed revised proposed capital improvements. The Tigard water system serves areas inside the Cities of Tigard,King City,and Durham, and also serves portions of unincorporated Washington County.Currently,the system serves approximately 15,000 customers.The majority of the system's water supply is currently purchased from the City of Portland,with additional production from tai---lystem wells and additional wat r purchase from the City of Lake Oswego and the Tualatin Valley Water District.For the definition of rates and SDCs the system is divided into the lower 410 pressure zone and the higher Bull Mountain area.The Bull Mountain area includes the 550 idgh pressure and gravity pressure zones,and the 713 high pressure and gravity pressure zones.Separate rates and SDCs are maintained for the Bull Mountain area because of the additional pumping expense and system facilities required to serve the higher elevations. Table 1 summarizes the existing System Development Charge,including the reimbursement fee and improvement fee,but not including any installation charge. 1 , , , i SEPT 12000 SDC FINAL REPOW.DOC t TIGARD WATER SYSTEM SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE UPDATE TABLET Tigard Water Service Area Existing System Development Charge Schedule Meter Size 410 Zone Bull Mountain Area 5/8—'/4 Inch $986 $1,507 1—Inch $1,972 -$3,014 1;§-Inch $4,930 $7,535 2—Inch $7,888 $12,056 3—Inch $15,776 $24,112 4—Inch $24,650 $37,675 6—Inch $49,300 $75,350 8—Inch $78,880 - $120,560 10—Inch $113,390 $173,305 Legislative Considerations In 1989,the State of Oregon enacted legislation that authorizes local governments to define and assess SDC and the legislation also places limits on the ways revenues generated through SDCs can be used.A copy of ORS 223.297-314 is included in the Appendix of this Memorandum.A SDC is defined in ORS 223.299,and is an amount charged to a new user at the time of connection to the water system in excess of the cost of inspecting and installing the connection.The SLC does not include fees assessed or collected through local improvement districts.Tl:e statute further breaks down the SDC into an improvement fee and a reimbursement fee.The improvement fee is a fee for the cost of capital expansions to be constructed.The reimbursement fees a fee for the costs of capital improvements already constructed or under construction. ORS Chapter 223 specifies that the reimbursement fee must be established by an ordinance or resolution that sets forth the methodology that will be used to calculate the charge.It { further specifies that the methodology must consider the cost of existing facilities,prior contributions by existing users,the value of unused capacity,ratemaking principles a employed to finance the capital improvements,and other relevant factors.The objective of the methodology must be that future system users contribute no more than an equitable share of the cost of existing facilities. The improvement fee methodology must also be specified in an ordinance or resolution that considers the cost of projected capital improvements needed to increase the capacity of the system.ORS Chapter 223 further requires that a credit be provided for the construction of qualified public improvements(contributions).A qualified public improvement is one required as a condition of residential development approval,identified in the system's SEPT 12000 SDC FINAL REPORT.DOC 2 7r.ARD WATER SYS: CHARGE UPDATE capital improvement program,and either(i)not located on or contiguous to the property being developed or(ii)located on or contiguous to the property being developed but required to be built larger than necessary to serve the property being developed. Revenues generated through the reimbursement fees must be spent only on capital improvements to the system or repayment of debt on those improvements.Revenues generated through the improvement fees are dedicated to capacity increasing capital improvements or repayment of debt on capacity increasing capital improvement.An increase in capacity is established if the improvements increase the level of performance or service provided by existing facilities or provide new facilities.The portion of such improvements funded by improvement fees must be related to current or projected development. Other provisions of ORS Chapter 223 require that: . A local government implementing an SDC must develop a capital improvement plan (CIP)or other comparable plan that lists the improvements that may be funded with improvement fee revenues and the estimated timing and cost for each improvement. Any capital improvement being funded wholly or in part with SDC revenues shat'be included in the plan adopted by the local government. • SDC revenues must be deposited into dedicated accounts,and local government must provide an annual accounting of revenues and expenditures. • Local government must provide for an administrative appeal procedure whereby a citizen or other interested party may challenge an expenditure of SDC revenues. . No legal action challenging the methodology used to calculate SDCs may be filed after 60 days from the enactment of or revision to the SDC. • The provisions of ORS 223.297 to 223.314 are not applicable if they impair the local govemmenes bond obligations or the ability of the local government to issue new bonds or other financing. Proposed Capital Improvements Capital improvements are identified in the City of Tigard Water Distribution System y Hydraulic Study(2000 Hydraulic Study)prepared by Murray,Smith&Associates,Inc.ALT y capital projects identified in the 2000 Hydraulic Study are incorporated into this SDC except j demolition projects,Aquifer Storage and Recovery studies,and water main replacement projects.These three types of projects are not,for the purposes of this SDC analysis,defined y as capacity-increasing projects. A$40 million water supply project has been identified by the City,which will provide a 7 long-term water source owned by the City.This water supply project would provide an estimated 20.0 mgd of water on a maximum day basis to the Tigard water service area.Debt financing is projected,with three annual interest-only payments followed by levelized principal and interest payments over the subsequent 22 years at a 60/6 interest rate.Debt issuance costs include a capitalized bond reserve estimated at 8.7%of bond proceeds and other costs of issuance estimated at 2.0%of bond proceeds. SEPT VOW SDC FINAL REPORT.DOC 3 TICARV WATER SYSTEM SYSTEM DEYELOPMEH't CHA%E UPDATE Prior to adoption of this SDC,state law requires that the City adopt a Capital Improvement Plan that contains the proposed capital projects that form the basis of the SDC. Methodology Used To Calculate SDS' The SOC is comprised of a reimbursement fee and improvement fee.The reimbursement fee is intended to recover the costs associated with the growth-related(or available)capai—zy in the existing system,and the improvement fee is based on the costs of capacity-increasing future improvements needed to meet the demands of growth. Equivalent Dwelling Units Equivalent Dwelling Unit(EDU)data was calculated from information contained in the City's May 2000 Water Distribution System Hydraulic Study(2000 Hydraulic Study)and current meter size data provided by the City of Tigard.Table 2 summarizes March 2000 meter data provided by the City,showing 21,465 meter equivalents system wide. Table 5-1 of the May 2000 Water Distribution System Hydraulic Study reports a projected 2000 peak day demand of 13.84 mgd.Dividing the 2000 maxianurt day demand by the existing 21,465 meter equivalents results in a maximum day demand of 645 gpd per meter e „iyaIPnt,Throughout this analysis,an EDU is defined as a water system connection with q� a 5/8 x 3/4-inch meter with a maximum day water consumption of 645 gpd. TABLE 2 Meter Equivalent Data as of March 2004 Meter Size March 2000 Number Meter Equivalent Number of Meter of Meters Factor Equivalents 5/8—V4 Inch 12,975 1.0 12,975 1—Inch 1,190 2.5 2,975 1 Ds-Inch 365 3.6 1,314 2—inch 314 8 2,512 3—Inch 19 15 285 4—Inch 6 25 150 6—Inch 5 50 250 + 8—Inch 6 80 480 a 10—Inch 1 140 144 12-Inch 1 380 380 T Total Number of Meter Equivalents 21,465 SEPT 1 2000 SOC FINAL REPORTAOC 4 TIGARD WATER SYSTEM SYSIEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE UPDATE System Capacity The 2000 Hydraulic Study estimated water system demands for each water system pressure zone at existing demands and at saturation for a hater service area that encompass--.the existing Tigard water service arca and Urban Reserves 47,48,and 49.The saturation analysis was based on planning data provided by the City of Tigard,and projects an increase of service area population from a current estimate of 46,144 to a saturation estimate of 85,147. For the 410 Zone,the existing maximum day demand is an estimated 7.80 mgd,and the projected saturation maximum day demand i.:16.17 mgd.The projected increase in system capacity in the 410 Zone,measured by maximum day demand,is 8.37 mgd.For the Bull Mountain area,the existing maximum day demand is an estimated 6.04 mgd,and the projected saturation maximum day demand is 11.93 mgd.The projected increase in system capacity in the Bull Mountain area,measured by maximum day demand,is 189 mgd. Water system growth rates projected in the 2000 Hydraulic Study are based or-,population projections provided by Metro and include an annual 1.2%growth rate. Reimbursement Fee The general methodology used to develop the reimbursement fee includes the following four steps: 1. Determine the value of growth-related capacity 2. Define system capacity 3. Calculate the unit cost of growth—related capacity 4. Develop reimbursement fee per EDU The valve of growth-related capacity in this analysis is based on the non- -ontributed depreciated plant investment.The existing plant investment used in the 1996 SDC calculation was used as the basis for the es,!mate,!current plan xnve -:mt. Adjustments from the 1996 plant investment include estimated depreciation between 1996 and 2000,addition of facilities(i.e.the Menlor Reservoir)completed since 1996,and addition of existing capital reserves.Table 3 shows the derivation of the reimbursement fee. including the derivation of the net system investment of$24,370,445. The system capacity,described above,is the estimated saturation maximum day demand of 28.1 mgd.Use of saturation maximum day demand as a measure of system capacity is a change from the existing methodology,where the existing system capacity is used.Dividing the net system investment by the system capacity results in the vnit cost o°growth-related capacity of$867,276 per mgd of system capacity. To determine the reimbT?rsement fee per EDU,the net investment per unit of system capacity is multiplied by the estimated capacity requirements,645 gpd,of"i EDU.The 1 resulting improvement`ee is$561 per EDU. SEPT 12CCO SDC FINAL REPORT-DOC 5 Table 3 Reimbursement Fee Calculation Item Total 1996 Rate Study Fixed Asset Value(.s of 6/30/95) $14,261,700 Less Estimated Depreciation(1996-2000) ($1,457,359) Plus Assets Constructed Sinre 6/30/95 Menlo.-Rczcrvoir,Original Cost Less Deprec. $3,616,104 Subtotal $16,420,445 Less:Current Outstanding Debt Principal(a) $0 Plus:Current Cash Reserves(a) $7,950,000 Net System Investment $24,370,445 Saturation System Wide System Capacity,n;gd 28.1 Net Investment per mgd $867,276 Net Investment per gpd $0.87 Maximum Day Water Demand(gpd)(c) 645 Reimbursement SDC perEDU $561 Notes: (a)Projected 6/30/00 reserve balance in water funds (b) Estimated saturated system wide maximum day demand i (c) Estimated 2000 max day demand divided by the number of 2000 system-wide meter equivalents a i i September 1.MM CNQm K L Inc. TIGARD WATER SYSTEM SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE UPDATE Ianprovement Fee The general methodology used to develop the improvement fee is similar to that for the reimbursement fee,and includes the following four steps: 1. Determine the costs ofgrowth-rel--ted improvements 2. Calculate the unit cost of additional capacity 3. Calculate debt service credit 4. Develop reimbursement fee per EDU Cost of Growth-Related Improvements Capacity-increasing project costs were identified in a Draft City of Tigard Distribution System Hydraulic Study Financial Plan Technical Assistance memorandum(2000 Technical Memorandum)prepared by Murray,Smith&Associates,Inc,a copy of which is included in the Appendix.The 2000 Technical Memorandum identifies allocations of project costs to the 410 Zone and the Bull Mountain area and allocations of project costs to existing capacity and future capacity.The allocations between existing capacity and future capacity are generally based on the ratio of existing to saturation maximum day demand in the area benefiting from the project.Projects required to serve the Urban Reserves are allocated entirely to growth.The City's water main oversizing program was allocated between existing and future capacity by C142M HILL based on the ration of system wide existing and saturation maximum day demand.Table 4 shows,for each distribution system project included in the SDC,the project cost in 2000 dollars and the allocations of project costs between 410 and Bull Mountain areas and between existing and future capacity.Use of 2000 dollars is a change from the current methodology,where an inflation-adjusted cost was used.This change was made because of the long-term i...cure of the capital improvement plan that is based on a saturation analysis and a capital improvement plan schedule covering over twenty years. The City is pursuing the feasibility of a number of potential options for securing a guaranteed long-term water supply.For the water supply project,the derivation of the capacity increasing project cost is defi*,ed by the fptt ..,._.o Seri—cf • Define the project cost,estimated at$40,000,000 and the amount($3,900,000)expected to be funded from existing Tigard water system capital reserves.The remaining $36,100,000 would be funded by debt issuance. • Estimate the costs of debt financing,including the capitalized bond reserve and costs of n debt issuance for the bond issue that would supply$36,100,000 of bond proceeds for the " water supply project.The estimated financing costs are$4,325,500,for a total project cost of$44,325,500. • Calculate the proportion of the water supply project to be allocated to future capacity The 20.0 mgd water supply project would supply the existing maximum day demand of 13.84 mgd plus an additional 6.16 mgd.30.8%of the water supply project is allocated to growth(30.8%=6.16/20). SEPT 12000 SDC FINAL REPORT.DOC 6 TaNc 4 Distribotin SYslem Capin)hrworemnas Incorporated Into SDC Pertrnt Pacest Proj-Curt All-d to All]acned to Allocaedto Alt-un>d 10 Allocated to 410Z- Bull Mm. PROJECT TOTAL New User Bull Mountain 410 Zorn Ncw User New Users Rtgrvoln 6t Smrag<: 55OZne Rexrvoir No.1 2.950.000 583% IOD% 0 0 1,725.000 550Zne Rex rvoir No.2 4200.000 583% 100% 0 0 2,457.000 410 Zane Reservoir Na.3 2.400.000 49.7% 0% 2.400.000 1,192.800 0 713 Zane Reservoir No.4 2,400,000 19.9% IOM% 0 0 476,700 Reservoir Evaluatin Pmgrmn 130,000 50.0% 50% 65.000 32.500 32500 Sudad-Reservobs R St 512.080.000 52.465.000 SI.225300 34.691.2ts0 Transmission.Disnibution.$Pump Statiom: Melva Px�.p Stad-(550 Zoa) 675.000 585% 1006 0 0 394.875 Transfer Pump Satin(550/)13 Zone) 2,100,000 44.0% 100% 0 0 924.000 M8h Tor Pump Sndn(7 13 Z m) 750,000 23.1% 100% 0 0 173.250 Pump Satin No.2 Uppadc(410 rad 510/1 13 Z-) 400.000 47.4% 41% 236010 111.77] V.675SW Wa uut Street lsspu-nls 681,000 49.7% 0% 681,000 338.457 0 Z1-Main:Walnut Street.121st to Ban-- 1368000 49.7% O% 1,368,000 679,896 0 R-.Read Warn Main 301 000 49.7% 0% 304,000 151064 0 Sin No.I Piping InVmvemcnts 200,000 49.7% 0%� 200,000 99.40 il Site No.4 Piping inpmvemcnn 300.000 49.7'!: 0% 300.000 149.100 0 24'M in:Beef Beud Road and Pwi0c Highway 1.754.000 49.7% 0% 1,254,000 623.238 0 Nash 121st Avenue Upgrade 513.000 49.7% 0% 513AOO 254,961 0 SW Lincoln Street 60,000 49.]% 0% 60.000 29,820 0 SW Bumharn S-1 334,000 49.]% O% 334.000 165.W 0 F"410Zuns Upgrd 1,109,600 49.7% 096 1,109.600 551.471 0 SW Barrows Road 228,000 49.7% 0% 228,(00 113,316 0 SW King Richard Drive 68.000 49.7% 0% 68000 33.796 0 SW 93r1/SW 92.d Avenues 399.000 49.7% M% 399.000 198303 0 SW Fairtnvcn 421.800 49.7% O% 421.800 209.635 0 SWK-n/SW 1251h Avenue 127,500 49.7% 0% 127300 63368 0 410 Reservoir No.5 Supply 380.000 49.7% 0 00% 380,0 188,860 0 King City U+C Reserve 344500 100% 0% 344,500 344500 0 Weu Urban It- 1.748.00D 100% 096 1.748000 1.748.000 0 Wat 550 Zone Reservoir Supply 342,000 58S% 1004 0 0 200.070 Eau55OZorse Reservoir Supply 608,000 58.5% 100% 0 O 355.680 Canterbury Srspply 1026.000 585% 10096 0 0 -,210 Nanhcast 550 Zu-Transmi.ma 676500 "_5% 100% 0 0 372353 Soul,5507 Tr-%"s.'- 1,054500 SBS% 100% 0 0 616.883 Northwest 550 Z e Tm,,dssin 714,400 58.5% IOD% 0 0 417.924 West Transmission MODO 563% 100% 0 0 489.060 9fci=uc,132.dto 13501 304,000 583% 100% 0 0 1]7.840 SW Walnut LISW I=Suva 342.000 585% 1004 0 0 200.070 csaterbur,Cool. 684.000 18.54 100% 0 0 400.140 SW CrecksW-Drive 85,000 583% 10096 04Y.- an UrbR-Area No.d8 760.00D 100.0% 100% 0 0 760.000 Buli M-nWn Crntral Loop 285,000 22.6% 100% 0 0 64.410 Wcu Transmission 436000 22.6% 100'% 0 0 Y03A56 1501h Avevtse 342,000 22.6% 100% 0 0 77.292 SouOs T-- 212500 22.6% 100% 0 0 48.025 Surview Caassection 42500 22.6% 100% 0 0 9.605 NMM nTrasasndssin 382.500 22.6% IOD% 0 0 W445 Southwest Transm6sin 85,000 22.6% 100% 0 0 19.210 4 Southeast Transndssin 255.00 000 22.6% IOM% 0 0 57.630 Noril-an Trans .- 238,0 22.6% 100% 0 0 53.788 i Novts Traysmtssin 8.5,000 226% 100% 0 0 19.2 4 SW'144th Avenue 142,587 23.1% 100% 0 0 32,918 i SWBenchview T- 114.000 23.1% 100% 0 0 26334 SW B-11 Mosmsair Road 285.000 23.1% If#% 0 0 65.835 Nauhwest Tr�tsmisain 191.250 23.1% 100% 0 0 64,179 SW ISM Avenue 85.000 23.1% 100% 0 0 19.635 7 Dhtributrn System Ovarsirzs 1.575.000 505% 44.8% 868.772 438.730 356.645 Tck-my BY-ltgsovemmn 300,000 505% 44.8% 165,480 83568 67.932 SUNdaI-T�^�^�n'n.DinfiWd a,and PuV Sta ka 26234.050 11.110.653 6.5]7.281 7361.903 TOTAL Dista tion Pro Cour X38314.037 5133]3,653 57.802581 512033.103 Table 5 Improvement Fee Water Distribution System Item Supply 410 Zone Bull Mountain Project Cost(a) $44.325,500 $13,575,653 $21,038,397 %Allocable to Growth(b) 30.8% 57.5% 57.3% Growth Related Cost(b) $13,652,254 $7,802,581 $12,053,103 Increase in Capacity Provided by Project,mgd(b) 6.16 8.37 5.89 Unit Cost of Additional Capacity,$/mgd $2,216,275 $932,208 $2,046,367 Unit Cost of Additional Capacity,$(gpd $2.22 $0.93 $2.05 Maximum Day Water Demand(gpd)(c) 645 645 645 Additional Capacity Cost Per EDU(d) $1,432 $600 $1,322 Less Debt Service Credit(e) ($552) $O $0 Improvement Fee,$/EDU $880 $600 $1,322 Notes: (a)Water supply project cost: placeholder value to be incorporated into an adopted Capital Improvement Plan. I ineclnd� nroc:eeds of$40M for oroiect and financing costs required to issue debt service Distribution System:Refer to Table 4 (b) Water supply:Based on water supply project with 20 mgd capacity and projected 20W 13.84 mgd peak day demand. Water supply growth percentage=(20-13.84)/20=30.8% Distribution System:Refer to Table 4 1 (c) Projected 2000 peak day demand divided number of 2000 system-wide meter equivalents 7 (d) Unit cost of capacity,in$/gpd,multiplied by maximum day water demand per EDU (e) Refer to Table 6 N i 7 Seplanber 1.2000 C/QM HILL 1-- TrARD WATER SYSTEM SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE UPDATE System Capacity and Unit Costs of Addf!anal Capacity For the distribution system improvements,the increase in system capacity is the difference between existing saturation maximum day demand and estimated existing maximum day demand.This information is provided in the 2000 Hydraulic Study for the 410 Zone and Bull Mountain area. Table 5 shows the unit costs of capacity for the water supply component,the 410 Zone distribution system component,and the Bull Mountain Lnea distribution component.The unit cost of future capacity is calculated by dividing the project cost n1locable to growth by the increase ir_system capacity. Deb,Service Creat A debt service credit is applied to the improvement fee in recognition that the water supply project will be debt financed,that the water supply project benefits existing as well as future customers,and that future customers will be repaying debt service for facilities that benefit existing customers.The debt service credit is detailed in Table 6,and includes a calculation, for each year where outstanding water supply project debt service exists,of the amount of debt service principal benefiting existing customers that paid per EDU.The debt service credit is the present value of these debt service payments calculated using a nominal interest rate of 5%.Table 6 shows that the debt service credit is$552 per EDU. Improvement Fee Per EDU The improvement fee per EDU is calculated by multiplying the unit cost of future capacity by the estimated capacity requirements,645 gpd,of an EDU,and applying the debt service credit.Table 5 shows that the improvement fee for the water supply project(not including the debt service credit discussed below)is$1,432 per EDU.This component of the improvement fee would be applied system wide.For the 410 Zone,an additional distribution system component of$600 per EDU would be applied,and for the Bull Mountain area,an additional distribution system component of$1,322 per EDU would be applied. Proposed Systema Development Charge The proposed SDC per EDU is the sum of the reimbursement fee and inn iuLpw emc fcc, and is summarized in Table 7.Table 8 presents the proposed SDC applied to each water meter size.Prior to adoption of the SDr,C142M HILL recommends that the City's legal counsel review this memorandum and that a Capital Improvement Plan be adopted that + contains the capital improvements upon which the improvement fee is based. a a s SEPT 12000 SDC FINAL REPOF1T.D0C 7 . 1 Table 6 Debt Service Credit Water Supply Project Cost 540,000,000 Less Existing Reserves Used to Finance Project ($3.900,000) Debt Proceeds Toward Project $36,100,000 Financing Costs(Bond Reserve and Cost of Issuance) $4,325.500 Taal Debt Principal 540,425.500 Anticipated Debt Service Terms 3 Years Interest Only Payments Followed By L,velized Principal and Interest Payments Over 22 Year Period With Expected interest Rate of 6% Present Value of Principal Repayment per EDU $552 Present Value Discount Rate 5.00% Repl De W� Replacement Replacement Principal Repayment Principal Percent Debt Service Paid With Number of Principal per Year Payment of Plant Principal SDC$ EDU$ _EDU 2001 s0 69.2% $0 s0 21,723 $0.00 2002 s0 69.2% $0 s0 21,983 s0.00 2003 s0 69.2% s0 $0 22,247 $0.00 2004 $931,629 69.2% $644,087 $0 22,514 $28.63 2005 $987,526 69.2% $683,368 s0 22,784 $29.99 2006 $1,046,778 69.2% $724,370 s0 23,058 $31.42 2007 $1,109,585 69.2% $767,833 so 23,334 $32.91 2008 $1,176,160 69.2% $813,903 s0 23,614 534.47 2009 $1,246,729 69.2% $862.737 s0 23,898 $36.10 200 $;.321533 69.2% $914,501 s0 24.184 $37.81 2011 $1,400,825 69.2% $969,371 $0 24,301 $39.89 2012 $1,484,875 69.2% $1,027,533 s0 24,418 $42.08 2013 $1,573,967 69.2% 61,089.185 s0 24,536 $4439 2014 51,668,405 69.2% $1,154.536 s0 24,654 $46.83 �-8 599 f+9.2% $1,223.808 $0 24,773 $49.40 2016 $1,874,620 69.2% $1,297,237 W 2017 $1,987,097 69.2% $1,375,071 s0 25,013 $54.98 2018 $2,106,323 69.2% $1,457,575 s0 25.133 $57.99 } 2019 $2,232,702 69.2% $1.545.030 s0 25254 $61.18 i 2020 - $2,366,664 69.2% $1,637,732 s0 25,376 $6454 2021 $2,508,664 69.2% $1,735.996 s0 25,476 $68.14 2022 $2,659,184 69.2% $1,840,155 $0 25,577 $71.95 i 2023 $2,818,735 69.2% $1,950,565 s0 25,678 $75.96 a 2024 $2,987,859 69.2% $2,067,599 $0 25,779 $80.20 2025 $3.167,131 69.2% $2.191,655 $0 25,881 $84.65 7 a�e.ei me TIGARO WATER SYSTEM SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE UPDATE TABLE 7 Proposed SDC Per Equivalent Dwelling Unit 410 Zone Bull Mountain Area Reimbursement Fee $561 $561 Improvement Fee Water Supply $1,432 $1,432 Debt Service Credit ($552) ($552) Distribution System $600 $1,322 Total $2,041 $2,763 TABLE 8 Tigard Water Service Area Proposed System Development Charge Schedule Meter Size 410 Zone Buil Mountain Area 5/8—'/.Inch $2,041 $2,763 1—Inch $5,103 $6,908 1 1/2-Inch $7,348 $9,947 2—Inch $16,328 $22,104 3—Inch $30,615 $41,445 �_Inch $51,025 $69,075 6—Incn $102,050 $138,150 8—Inch $163,280 $221,040 ,_ ,,,_„ $293,496 $397,319 12 Inch $775,907 $1,050,382 i i I I 3 a SEPT 1 200 SOC FINAL REPORT.00C 8 HARD WATER SYSTEM SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE UPDATE APPENDIX Jil SEPT 12000 SOCfWAL REJORf.DOC 9 OREGON REVISED STATUTES,1997 VERSION,CHAPTER 223 SYST'FM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES 223.297 Policy.The purpose of ORS 223.297 to 2.23.314 is to provide a uniform framework for the imposition of system development charges by governmental units for specified purposes and to establish that the charges may be used only for capital improvements.[1989 c.449 s.l; 1991 c.902 s.251 Note:223.297 to 223.314 were added to and made a part of 223.205 to 223.295 by!egislative action,but were not added to and made a—rt of the Bancroft Bonding Act.See section 10, chapter 449,Oregon Laws 1989. 223.299 Definitions for ORS 275.297 to:,Z3.314.As used in ORS 223.297 to 223.314: (1)(a)"Capital improvement"means facilities or assets used for the following-. (A)Water supply,treatment and distribution; (B)Waste water collection,transmission,treatment and disposal; (C)Drainage and flood control; (D)Transportation;or (E)Parks and recreation. (b)"Capital improvement'does not include costs of the operation or routine maintenance of capital improvements. (2)"improvement fee"means a fee for costs associated with capital improvements to be constructed. (3)"Reimbursement fee"means a fee for costs associated with capital improvements already constructed or under consa-uction. (4)(a)"System development charge"means a reimbursement fee,an improvement fee or a combination thereof assessed or collected at the time of increased usage of a capital improvement or issuance of a development permit,building permit or connection to the capital improvement.System development charge includes that portion of a sewer or water system connection charge that is greater than the amount necessary to reimburse the governmental unit for its average cost of inspecting and installing connections with water and sewer facilities. (b)"System development charge'does not include any fees assessed or collected as part of a local improvement district or a charge in lieu of a local improvement district assessment or the cost of complying with requirements or conditions imposed upon a land use decision, expedited land division or limited land use decision.[1989 c.449 s.2;1991 c.817 s.29;1991 c.902 s.26;1995 x595 s.28) Note:See note under 223.297. 223.300[Repealed by 1975 c.642 s.261 223.302 System development charges;use of revenues;review procedures.(1)Goverrunen'•_ I =+s are authorized to establish system development charges,but the revenues produced therefrom shall be expended only in accordarice with ORS 223,297 to 223.314.If a governmental unit expends any such revenues in violation of the lir_itations described in ORS 273.307,the governmental unit shall replace the misspent amount with moneys derived from other sources. Replacement moneys shall be deposited in a fund designated for the system development ' charge revenues not later than one year following a determination that the funds were misspent. (2)Governmental units shall adopt administrative review procedures by which any citizen or other interested person may challenge an expenditure of system development charge revenues. Such procedures shall provide that such a cballenge must be filed within two years of the expenditure of the system development charge revenues.The decision of the governmental unit shall be reviewed only as provided in ORS 34.010 to 34.100,and not otherwise.[1989 c.449 s.3; 1991 c.902 s.271 Note:See note under 223.29:. 223.304 Determination of amount of system development charges;ordinance;credit allowed against charge;limitation of action contesting ordinance imposing chaage;notification request.(1)Reimbursement fees shall be established by ordinance or resolution setting forth a methodology that considers the cost of the existing facility or facilities,prior contributions by existing users,the value of unused capacity,rate-making principles employed to finance publicly owned capital improvements and other relevant factors identified by the local government imposing the fee.The methodology shall promote the objective of future system users contributing no more than an equitable share to the cost of existing facilities.The methodology for establishing such fees shall be available for public inspection. (2)Improvement fees shall be established by ordinance or resolution setting forth a methodology that consider;the cost of projected capital improvements needed to increase the capacity of the systems to which the fee is related.The methodology for establishing such fees shall be available for public inspection. (3)The ordinance or resolution that establishes an improvement fee shall also provide for a credit against such fee for the construction of a qualified public improvement.A"qualified public improvement"means a capital improvement that is required as a condition of development approval,identified in the plan adopted pursuant to ORS 223.309 and either: (a)Not located on or contiguous to property that is the subject of development approval;or (b)Located in whole or in part on or contiguous to property that is the subject of development approval and required to be built larger or with greater capacity than is necessary for the particular development project to which the improvement fee is related. (4)(u)"The credit provided for in subsection(3)of this section shall be only for the improvement fee charged for the type of improvement being constructed,and credit for qualified public improvements under subsection(3)(b)of this section may be granted only for the cost of that portion of such improvement that exceeds the government units minimum standard facility size or capacity needed to serve the particular development project or property.The applicant shall have the burden:of demonstrating that a particular improvement qualifies for credit under subsection(3)(b)of this section. {b)When,the construction of a qualified public improvement gives rise to a credit amount greater than the improvement fee that would otherwise be levied against the project receiving devel..�pment approval,the excess credit may be applied against improvement fees that accrue in subsequent phases of the original development project.This subsection shall not prohibit a unit of government from providing a greater credit,or from establishing a system providing for the transferability of credits,or from providing a credit for a capital improvement not identified in the plait adopted pursuant to ORS 213.309,or from providing a share of the cost of such improvement by other means,if a unit of government so chooses. " (c)Credits shall be used in the time specified in the ordinance but not later than 10 years from the date the credit is given. ()An 5 Any,mit of lorai government that proposes to adopt a system development charge shall y maintain a list of p.rsons who have made a written request for notification prior to adoption or amendment of a methodology for any system development charge.Written notice shall be mailed to persons on the list at least 45 days prior to the first hearing to adopt or amend a system development charge,and the methodology supporting t=he adoption or amendment shall be available at least 30 days prior to the first hearing to adopt or amend.The failure of a i person on the list to receive a notice that was mailed shall not invalidate the action of the local government.The unit of local government may periodically delete names from the list,but at least 30 days prior to removing a name from the list must notify the person whose name is to)e deleted that a new written request for notification is required if the person wishes to remain on the notification list.No legal action intended to contest the methodology used for calculating a system development charge shall be filed after 60 days following adoption or modification of the system development charge ordinance or resolution by the local government.A.person shall contest the methodology used for calculating a system development charge only as provided in ORS 34.010 to 34.100,and not otherwise.[1989 c.449 s.4;1991 c.902 s.28;1993 c.80's.201 Note:See note under 223.297. 223.305[Repealed by 1971 c.325 s.l] 223.307 Autho_-ized expenditure of system development charges.(1)Reimbursement fees shall be spent only on capital improvements associated with the systems for which the fees are assessed including expenditures relating to repayment of indebtedness. (2)Improvement fees shall be spent only on capacity increasing capital improvements, including expenditures relating to repayment of debt for such improvements.An increase in system capacity may be established if a capital improvement increases the level of performance or service provided by exiting facilities or provides new facilities.The portion of such improvements funded by improvement fees must be related to current or projected development. (3)System development charges shall not be expended for costs associated with the construction of adsinistrative office facilities that are more than an incidental part of other capital improvements. (4)Any capital improvement being funded wholly or in part with system development charge revenues shall be included in the plan adopted by a governmental unit pursuant to ORS 223.309. (5)Notwithstanding subsections(1)and(2)of this section,system development charge revenues may be expended on the direct costs of complying with the provisions of ORS 223.297 to 223.314,including the costs of developing system development charge methodologies and providing an annual accounting of system development charge expenditures.11989 c.449 s.5; 1991 c.902 s.291 Note:See note under 223.297. i i (2)A Qovemmental unit that has prepared a plan described in subsection(1)of this section may t + modify such plan at any time.[1989 c.449 s.6;1991 c.902 s.301 + Note:See note under 223.297. j 223.310[Amended by 1957 c.397 s.3;repealed by 1971 c.325 s.l] { 223.311 Deposit of system development charge revenues;annual accounting.System S development charge revenues shall be deposited in accounts designated for such moneys.The governmental unit shall provide an annual accounting for system development charges showing the total amount of system development charge revenues collected for each system and the projects that were funded.11989 c.449 s.7;1991 c.902 s.311 Note:See note under 223.297. 223.312[1957 c.95 s.4;repealed by 1971 c.325 s.11 223.313 Application of ORS 223.297 to 223.314.(1)ORS 223.297 to 223.314 shall apply only to system development charges in effect on or after July 1,1991. (2)The provisions of ORS 223.297 to 223.314 shall not be applicable if they are construed to impair bond obligations:or which system development charges ha.e been pledged or to impair the ability of governmental units to issue new bonds or other financing as provided by law for improvements allowed under ORS 223.297 to 223.314.[1989 c.449 s.8;1991 c.902 s.32) Note:See note under 223.297. 223.314 Adoption of system development charge not a land use decision.The adoption of a system development charge,or a plan as provided for in ORS 223.309,or any modification thereto,is not a land use decision pursuant to ORS chapters 195 and 197.[1989 c.449 s.91 NGte:See note under 223.297. Dowriloadedfroai-,vww.leg.state.or.us/o October 18,1999. Mu>ragSmi�&Acsodnes,tuc. .`__ _ llism.�,s�tom . eonhnd,aegou9�1 �o�io}�T7010 �x;o�2t�-9oz� FACSIl4IILIL TRANSMQTTAL Date: June 8.2000 Job No.: 99-0430.401 Thee: 9:30 a.m. _ Re: City of Tigard Distribution System Pages(including cover sheet): 6 Hydraulic Study Financial Flan Orighml to fbHow by mail: UYes H No Technical As tante Attention: f+st Griffith Company: CH2M Hill Fax Number: 425-452-5957 Comments: Art: here is a drift copy of the technical rremorandum for financial pian technical assistance. If you have 2M questions or comments please give us a tali Thank you i i 0 cc: Mike Miller.City of Tigard aid Fa-o•_•_•_- Carie Peterson MOM.(flow do riot necrim Om maam(ats at desc e7,ad atov4;pig au eonraerarvofJies Dema ady. Z�:-j l00'd lli-1 ZZ089lZEU4 YTSK-mg EL'EO C�6i-80-WSP R � i I �lotl�;snrim� es,loe. ltlfjlt2e15i1= _ htl ttu.yb,�yyt 1020 . Pabmi.0itgm 9TM • PH n SOf12i910 FAX 50jdZ5-90jj DATE: Juste 8,2000 PROJECT: 99-0430-401 D�/ ' ° TO: Mr-Art Griffith s� 8 CH2M Hill FROM: Chris Uber,P.B. Murray,Smith&Associates,Inc. RE: City of Tigard Distribution System Hydraulic Study Financial Plan Technical Assistance 1 Introduction In accordance with your request and the City's authorization,this technical memorandum has been prepared to document a cost apportionment of recommended water distribution system improvements from the City of Tigard's recently completed Water Distribution System Hydraulic Study, The methodology used for the apportionment of costs is developed and applied in accordance with your direction- This methodology is used to apportion the project cost of each improvement between existing and future capacity needs of the system and presents tabulated summaries of this effort. Background in May 20M_wnrar Distribu!io,System t-tydravlic Str4dv was completed for the City of Tigard by Murray,Smith&Associates,Inc- As part of this study a detailed hydraulic analysis of the distribution system was performed. The analysis evaluated the performance of the existing system and identified system improvements necessary to correct existing deficiencies and to provide for future system expansion. Also included in this effort was the * development of project cost estimates for all recommended improvements. These estunates are used in this memorandum as the basis for all cost data a In conjunction with the hydraulic study,the City is also reviewing and updating its water 1 service area system development charges(SDCS). In developing the SDCs,a methodology was established in accordance with our discussions for determining the proportion of each improvement needed to correct existing deficiencies and the proportion needed for system 99-0430.401 1'agc 1 Dist auxr,g--n Sys=Hydrauhc Steady June 8.2000 FinancW Plan Technical Assistance City of Tigard ZSt-d Z00'd Z_'.-.t ZZ059ZZEOS VISVI-MI WOO 00OZ-80-IUIP expansion. In addition,all improvement project costs associated with the Bull Mountain service area are identified. The Bull Mountain service area includes the 550-foot zone,the. 713-foot zone and the 713-foot high pressure zone covering areas on Bull Mountain and Canterbury hilt, Presented below is a desi-aiption of the methrv_rinw r1P.VP.loneli to apportion the costs of recommended improvements and to identify improvements needed to serve the Bull Mountain service area. Methodology Work associated with the hydraulic study included iden''dfieation of existing population and water demands,and development of anticipated ultimate population and water demands for the entire water service area. Based on projected water demand data and planning and analysis criteria developed for the hydraulic study,distribution system piping,pumping and storage improvements needed to correct existing system deficiencies and to support system expansion were identified for the water system service area- For reaFor use in development of SDCs,recommended improvements are grouped according to the pressure zone they will serve. The proportionate difference between the existing maximum day water demand and the projected ultimate maximum day water demand for each pressure zone is the basis for apportioning casts of improvements between existing capacities and future capacity needs. Project costs for improvements recommended within the Urban Reserve areas are considered entirely for future development and are apportioned as such_ Water demands and corresponding existing and future capacity percentages for each zone are shown in Table 1. Table I Project Cost Allocation by Pressure Zone Summary ..;C.� °.fi�•ps�.to,3¢�Ca6sft.:•�•;-- Iry �•• •`moi•.. �- �l�li�:: ..`' - .F.a.-c.rj,r. `tw+,���8�� .?`+. ,n-?:c5.•':'fi�._ `:oiiL.�. ':"':les_.. .k3v•• ..uJlb'.�'�''•'Yf';�• .��. w..:. r. 410-Foot 7.8 15-5 50.3% 49.7% 550-Foot(,-xavity and high pressv �) 2.7 6.5 41.s% 585% 713-Foot 2.4 1 3.1 77.4% 22.6% i 713-Foot Mgh Pressure 1.0 i-3 76.4% 23.196 :26A"':s %9275o•'r.; "4'7390` �.. Urban Reserve 1? 0% 100% Total Water Service Area 139 28.1 49.5% SOS% Most improvements recommended in the hydraulic study will ultimately serve only one zone a and are easily divided by the capacity percentages for that zone. A few projects will serve more than one zone when they are completed. For these improvements,a more detailed allocation calculation is required. A discussion of this allocation is presented below. 99-40430.401 Page 2 - Distribution System Hydraulic Study June 8,2000 Financir_l Man Technical Assistance r- -- City of Tigard zst-a troo'd W-1 zzosszzeos YYi{t-Mi woo cooz-eo-mr Pumping and Storage Facilities for the 713 foot Zones The High Tor Reservoirs,and the pumping facilities serving them,supply both the 713-foot zone and the 713-foot high pressure zona, inprovem—*s re—commended to t1sescuu-1 iu Y Y K- and storage facilities are initially divided between the two zones based on their respective ultimate maximum day water demand. The project cost of each recommended improvement is then apportioned into existing and fixture costs using the method dcscnbed abcove. Finally, the existing and future costs from each zone are added back together as listed in Table 2. Transfer Pump Station The Transfer Pump Station will ultimately serve the 5513-foot tone and both 713-foot zones_ Improvement costs for the transfer pump station are appropriated based on proportionate ultimate pumping capacities to each zone. Under this condition,approximately 3,900 gpm will be pumped to the 550-foot zone,and approximately 3,300 gpm will be pumped to both of the 713-foot zones. The portion of the project cost allocated to the 550-foot zone is then divided into existing and future costs using the previously described method. The portion allocated jointly to the 713-foot zones is split between the two,and the4 divided into existing and future costs. The existing and future costs from each zone are then added back together as listed in Table 2. Pump Station No.2 Pump Station No_2 will ultimately pump to the 10 MG Reservoir,which provides storage for the entire water service area. '*he project cost allocaticei of this improvement serving the Bull Mountain service area is determined by proportioning costs between the 13ull Mountain service area and the entire service area under a maximum day water demand condition at saturation development. The project cost is then divided into existing and future costs using the method described above. This improvement is listed separately on Tables 2 and 3 to reflect the portions of its service to the 410-foot zone and to the Bull Mountain service area. Cr►nclo�sion Cost breakdowns for all proposed facility and piping improvements are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. Table 2 lists improvements that will serve the Bull Mountain service area, and Table 3 lists all other improvements. 9904.30.401 Page 3 bl ufttion System Hydratulc study Junes 8.2000 Financial Plan?eehnicat Assistance City of Ttgazd 291-d Y00'd 291-1 ZZOOMEDS Mr.-nmi woo ooamo-1mr Table 2 Bull Mountain Servla Area Improvements Project Cost Estimate Summary Iry - aeility Im rgvements Station No_2 fAl%) $ 164,000 $ 91.840 $ 72,160 enlor Station $ 675,000 S 280.125 1 S 394,875 ransfer Fu Station $ 2.100.000 $ 1,176,000 $ 924,000 h Tor Pump Station $ 750,000 S 576,750 $ 173,250 50 Foot Reservoir No.1(2.0 MG) $ 2950,000 $ 1.224.250 $ 1,725,750 50-Foot Reservoir No.2(3-0 MG) $ 4-200,000 S 1,743.000 S 2,457,000 713-Foot Reservoir No.4O.8 MG S 2.100.000 $ 1.623,300 S 476.700 50 Foot Zone Pi g Im rovements est 550.Fc Reservoir Sn 1 $ 342 000 $ 141,930 S 200,070 550 Ft Reservoir Su 1 $ 608,000 $ 252320 $ 355,680 terb Su 1 S 1.026,000 $ 425.790 $ 600,210 ortheast 5506wFt Zone Transmission $ 636,500 S 264,148 $ 372,353 oath 550 Ft.Zone Transmission S 1,054500 $ 437,618 $ 616.883 orthwest 550-Ft Zone Transmission $ 714,400 S 296,476 $ 417,924 est Transmission S 836,000 S 346,940 $ 489,060 Laut.132nd to 135th $ 304,000 S 126,160 $ 177,£40 nut I-ane/SW Fern Street $ 342000 $ 141,930 S 200,070 ry loo $ 684000 S 283860 $ 400,140 kshi:eDrive $ 85,000 S 35,275 $ 497255 eserve Ama No.48 $ 760000 $ $ 760.000 t Zone Piping Im rosc nrnts Bull Mountain Central Loop Is 295.0001S 220590 $ 64,410 West Transmission $ 456,000 5 352 944 $ 103,056 150th Ave. $ 342.0001 $ 264,708 J.S 77.292 Smut+ Transmission i$ 212-5001 $ 164,475 1 S 48,025 ® Statview Connection $ 42,500 S 32,895 S 9.605 Northeast Transmission _ _- S 382,500 $ 296,055 S 86.445 outhwestTransmission S 85.000 S 65,790 S 19,210 Southeast Transmission $ 255,000 $ 197.370 S 57,630 orthwest Transmission _ $ 238,000 $ 184,212 S 53.788 orth Transmission 3 85-000 S 6.790 $ 19,210 1t13C' ��- 1.Si:."..:rr: 13 Foot lUgh Pressure Zone Piping improvements W 144th Ave. $ 142.500 T-169-583 S 32.918 Sw genrhview Terrace $ 114,000 5 87,666 IS 26,334 _W Bull Mt-Road $ 285,000 S 219,165 S 65,835 orthwestTransmission $ 191.250 $ 147.071 S 44,179 SW 150th Ave. $ 85.000 S 65.365 S� 19.635 `- Tota! $ 23-532,690 $ 11 oaaZOW Fwnes�oa[+�+p.�ori5ace�rcca�Nuyv'�ah to AM 291-d 900'd 0002-80-ldlr Table 3 410-Foo=Zone Improvements Project Cost Fi±-%thrude Summary a It Improvements ' upump Station No.2 5996 S 236,000 $ 118.708 S 117,292 30-Foot Reservo+rNo.S 1.0 MG S 2.400,000 $ 1,207.200 S 1,192,800 W Gaarde Street PRV Station $ 150,000 S 75.450 S 74.550 121St Ave,and Former Stroet PPV Station S 280,00 $ 140.8401 $ 139,160 � ut rr ,tea l0-Foot Zone Pl lat vements Walnut Street S 681.720 S 342,905 $ 338,815 alnutSexet121sttoBarrows tea' S 1,368,000 S 688,104 S 679.896 arrows Road S 304,000 S 152,912 S. 151,088 it8 No.1 Piping Improvements $ 200,000 S 100,600 5 99,400 S1te M.4 Piping Lm rovementa S 300.000 S 1f 0,900 S 149,100 eef Bend Road&Pacific Iii wav S 1,254,000 $ 630,762 S 623.238 Oath 121st Ave.Upgrade S 513,000 $ 258,039 S 254,961 W Ldtteoin Strcet S 60,000 S 30.180 S 29,820 Burnbam Suva S 334.400 S 168,203 $ 166.197 t 410-Ft.Zone Upgra& S I,109.600 S 558.129 $ 551,471 W Barrows Road S 228,000 S 114.684 S 113.316 W Xing Richard Drive S 68.000 S 34.204 S 33,796 93rd AveJSW 92nd Ave. $ 399,000 S 200,697 S 198,303 W Fairhaven $ 421.800 S 212.165 S 209,635 SW Kareo/SW 125th Ave:. $ 127,500 $ 64,133 $ 63 36$ 10 Restrvoir No.5 Su 1 $ 380,000 $ 191.140 S 188,860 CI Urban Reserve NO.47) IS 344500 b - S 344.500 est Urban]terserve No 49 ,$ 1.748.000 i$ t'ri1i:"•l.��'rfiv42vy' ice$ �.!#i+i,' Total S907 S 3 39 55 $ 7467 F �O,lb. sl Af�Y�,6� 05140k512100e"AM 251-d 900"d 291-1 i20691ZE05 Yl91H108d 9Ee00 .0002-@0-Wlf EXH 1151T a�n Table City of 3 Water Distribution Sysi Capital Improvement 550•Faol ReaervoM No.1 rgwtly PuNhew 5l0Fnat R�aarwir No.1 z (55OFo Zuw) S 150.0001 S 1.400,000 - 1.480.008 550-Foot R—ir No.2 1'topony Pwtluae 550-Foot Rsearmk N0.2 55OFoot Zane S 200000 1 S 2.000.008 f 2.000.000 4/0•F:.o1 Reaervdr No,5 Storage flawwk 4S0-=Zor_- _ Factlttles F.—M 71311F o--lvok 140.4 .. 13•Foot Zone Reservoir Eveluatbn flawrvok Evalwibn Propnm P s /30,000 Raservdr No.3,A Reservo Abantlan nan, SWToIa f 350,000 S S 130000 S 1400000 S 1400000 S - S S 2,00(1.= f 2.00800 Msmior Rewrvok Site Manby Pump S. 5.50-F=ZOM S x75.800 New Pump Sbtbna Trarmiv Pump Station Tronfer Pump Slalian S=N13-Foct Zona 00 S 1.050.0f 1.050.000 Htp)1 Tw Reservck Sit. Pumping 13-Foot zone Facilities Pamp Lion Pump Station No.2 llppre0es Resenrok Site No.2 132ntl Street Pump Station P—P Station 13•Fod Zona AouWarmW Pump Station No.1 Pump Station No.7 Aband v ant Akaun4c anant Is 50.000 Sub•TMe S 5875 $ - S - S - (.105000(! S 9050000 It .50000 S treet 12'(14•Walnut S24•Walnut Street Suppy Main 18•Barrows 41aFool Zone f 681.720 f 458.000 $ 458.000 S 458.088 $ -+04.000 Tra Ession 16.20.550Foot Reservoir No.t Supply Improumgrts 55 1--Zona f 152.000 S 190." 2(r24.550Faot Reservoir No.2 Supply S 380.000 S 228.000 713-Fool Zone 12'150m Ave S 171.00o S 41PFo Zone Distribution 550-F—Zone System I,Fka Fke Flotow n Piping 713-Foot Zone 713-HP Zone D4trbulbn System Wast Suit Mountain Area Water Main 0—lzip VarbuatMrsizkp Propos•tOpatbna DpM60n1 Ql FN hnpovamen1 S 75.000 S 75,000 S 75,000 s 75,000 S 75.000 $ 75,000 S 75,000 f 75.000 f 75 000 Cvanl:ll9 Program naauciKl FadAtin S 150.000w U roh St Water Mein S 08.800 fl9PieC9manta •1x•SW Burnham 9 4 000 f ]5 000 $ 75,000 ; 75,0001S 7500010 75 000 f 751g S 75.000 Sutb Tota S 1452.]20 S 438.000 f 321.040 S 606.00o It 606.8011 $S -988000 S 882000 150000 13000 Ground ASR Study �St"d' 4 Water S 25,000 s 25,000 Wells Sub-Tote $ 25000 s 2500o S - $ Telemetry System Telemetry System Evalua5on Telanaztry Syslem knpreveman[s Other S 56.000 s 1s.oao p sue.TMa s SD hoc s 1zs 660 ss 7 S 3,013,]20 S ],60/,7wf f 11.3x9.729 1-1 508,880 ��,520,34! 5.=,42 t syy�w.aaoaLrTw�wa' 1rY►1