Resolution No. 98-12 CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON
RESOLUTION NO.98-/a
A RESOLUTION BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL TO GRANT AUTHORITY TO THE MAYOR
TO SIGN THE WASHINGTON REGIONAL CENTER GRANT INTERGOVERNMENTAL
AGREEMENT WITH THE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
WHEREAS,the City and ODOT entered into an intergovernmental agreement to develop a long
range comprehensive land use and transportation plan for the Washington Square Regional
Center area.
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on Feb. 24, 1998 to review the grant
workprogram and grant authority to the Mayor to sign the intergovernmental agreement.
NOW,THEREFORE;BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL THAT:
SECTION 1: The City Council approves of Mayor Nicoli signing the intergovernmental
agreement with ODOT on behalf of the City of Tigard.
PASSED: Bh6t 0l M1)LtS vote of all Council members present this p-O�day of
r tt Gt r _,.1998.
Catherine Wheatley,City Re=r
J Nicoli,Mayor
Approved as to form:
4AttoFney
y4-iy
Date
CS d o+
ORHRi-A�No.98-I Z
Page 1
Proj:.ct Description
The purpose of the Washington Square Regional Center plat;project is to
address land use and transportation plan changes that will be needed to meet
Metro's Region 2040 concept for this area. Changes in the affected local
jurisdictions'plans will most likely include promoting a more compact,mixed-use,
transit and pedestrian friendly built environment than has been developed in the
Washington Square area to date. To support the increased land use density in
this area,transp:rtation needs will require evaluation which may lead to possible
changes in local transportation plans.
Although a map of the proposed study area has been provided as per the TGM
guidelines,the first task in this effort is to develop agreement among the City of
Tigard,City of Beaverton, Metro,and Washington County on the general
boundaries of the Washington Square Regional Center study area. In addition,
the study will consider the surrounding community(area of influence)and
examine ways to connect this area of influence to the Regional Center while
minimizing the impacts.
The project team will establish a method of soliciting broad public participation
for the area. Public participants should include property owners, business
representatives, development representatives,and affected public agencies
(Tigard School District, Metro,ODOT,Washington County,City of Beaverton,
and City of Tigard). We will also hold an initial public workshop to both educate
the public about the Regional Center and to solicit input on the needs of the
area. Public participation will play a key role in the development and
implementation of the Washington Square Regional Center plan and,therefore,
a task force must be developed early in the planning process.
With assistance from the newly formed Washington Square Regional Center task
force, land use and design needs will be determined for this area. We will
consider types and densities of land uses required to encourage walking,
bicycling,and use of transit,which is the vision for the regional centers. Land
use considerations will be evaluated in terms of the Metro 2040 vision,the local
vision and also the needs of neighboring residential areas such as the Metzger
area. This plan will also need to give special consideration of the Tigard School
District since Metzger school is located in the Regional Center in addition to
other institutional needs for the area. The study will also consider the wLker
quality issues associated with this area as well as examining open space
requirements.
In terms of land use designations,the project team will evaluate the applicability
of Tigard's Mixed-Use Employment zone and comprehensive plan designation to
Adak Tigard's portion of the regional center. This effort may require changing zone
standards for the Mixed-Use Employment zone designation, or development of
1
new zone designations,or the inclusion of overlay zones for the Washington
Square Regional Center. Other involved jurisdictions will also need to evaluate
zoning and comprehensive plan needs for their respective portions of the
Regional Center.
Transportation will also play a key role in determining the success of the
Regional Center. A transportation analyst will review past transportation studies
and determine what further studies need to be completed. Obviously,one study
to be completed would be to determine the adequacy of the transportation
system to support Regional Center type land use densities. The transportation
analyst will also evaluate the circulation of the Washington Square study area in
terms of pedestrian, bicycle,and transit.
The location of Metzger school will play a unique role in the Regional Center
plan. Because of its location in close proximity to Lincoln Towers area,
consideration needs to be given on whether or not the school is located in an
appropriate area. If it stays,plans need to be made so that the school is
accessible by bicycle and walking.The City is also applying for a grant to provide
planning for safe routes to schools. This school is an excellent example of an
area that is in need of safe routes to and from school for children. InvolAment
from the school district will play a key role.
The primary final products will include:
m a set of Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan amendments that
provide higher density and intensity of mixed use development in the
Regional Center;
• Circulation and Parking Plans that include recommendations on the
management of transportation system impacts within and around the
Regional Center and that encourage the use of walking, bicycling,transit,and
manage congestion with increased development in the Regional Center;
• tables with maps summarizing development/redevelopment potentials;
• ordinance and comprehensive plan language for each of the affected
jurisdictions;
• any proposed transportation plan changes for each of the affected local
jurisdictions;
• Regional Center boundaries
• a basis for agreements between Tigard; Beaverton,Washington County to
develop a coordinated planning process for the Regional Center
Project Objectives
A. To develop a set of Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan amendments
that will achieve compact urban growth by providing higher densities/intensity
mixed use development opportunities with corresponding design standards
2
for high quality development and redevelopment projects in the Regiona!
Center. To support the type of land uses in this area, a comprehensive
transportation plan must be developed that will encourage use of alternative
forms of transportation.These land use and transportation objectives will
facilitate implementation of the Metro 2040 Growth Concept Regional Center
designation in the Washington Square area.
B. To complete a parking plan for the Regional Center that accommodates
future transportation needs based on higher densities and intensities of land
development and available land area but also achieves related statewide
Transportation Planning Rule(TPR)requirements(660-12-045). This parking
plan will be included in the Transportation Comprehensive Plan for the
Washington Square Regional Center.To meet any other TPR requirements
and Metro Urban Growth Functional Plan Title 2 requirements.
C. To develop a Transportation Master Plan for the Regional Center and impact
area,centering around Washington Square mall,that inciudes necessary
improvements to the bicycle, pedestrian,and manages traffic congestion
based on the impacts of future development. To meet the TPR(660-12-060)
and the Metro Growth Urban Functional Plan Title 6 requirements.
D. To increase pedestrian and bicycle trips within the Washington Square
AIRL Regional Center Area. One way to achieve a higher number of bicycle and
pedestrian trips in the area is to identify areas where bicycle and pedestrian
connections need to be made between adjacent land uses. A product of this
effort will be a list of needed pedestrian and bicycle improvements for this
area to be included in each affected jurisdiction's capital improvement
program.
Team member roles
Nadine Smith, Planning Supervisor for the City of Tigard,will provide overa!I
supervision on the general direction of the grant. Laurie Nicholson,Associate
Planner for the City of Tigard,will coordinate the daily tasks for the grant. Brian
Embley City of Tigard Associate Planner,will serve as a GIS resource.
John C. Spencer, Principal of Spencer&Kupper,will act as the contact person
with the City and TGM staff,and will serve as the overall project manager for the
consulting team. Beth Wemple of Kittelson&Associates will be responsible for
transportation related work elements. Urban design and planning tasks will be
the responsibility of Lloyd D. Lindley. Public involvement will be coordinated by
Elaine Cogan of Cogan Owens Cogan.
DBE Statement
3
MMEM9
Spencer/Kupper commits to using the following subconsultants to perform the
following listed tasks:
• Claire Levine Research and Writing-research, report writing, project
communications
• Christine Rains Graphic Design-publications,graphic design, presentations
• Nevue Ngan Associates-CAD/GIS services
• SRI/Shapiro/Agro-Water quality and environmental studies
Spencer/Kupper commits to utilizing these DBE firms for 11% of the amount of
grant money, or for$17,600.
Work program
Phase 1• Public Involvement Program
Task 1: (A) Establish a public involvement plan. (B)Research materials to
support the public involvement plan.
Objective: To develop a systematic, informed public involvement strategy.
Methodology: Research and write the public involvement plan.
Personnel &Hours:John Spencer: 8 hours
Elaine Cogan:40 hours
Laurie Nicholson: 30 hours
Products: A memo will be developed outlining the public and agency
involvement strategy.
Schedule: Months 2-3
Task 2: Form a Washington Square Regional Center Task Force to help
develop, review, and provide comments on project work program elements.
Notify existing groups,individuals with interest in the Washington Square
Regional Center of project elements and processes.
Objective:To develop an informed and communicative constituency for the
project and to act as a sounding board for development of project objectives and
implementing measures.
Methodology:The Public Involvement member of consultant team will further
define a public involvement strategy which may include visioning workshops and
focused presentations. Solicit members through publications, phone calls,
written communications, presentations of neighborhood and business
4
asseciations,and other groups. Develop a meeting schedule for participatory
groups.
Personnel&Hours: john Spencer:8 hours
Elaine Cogan:8 hours
Products:A mailing list of citizen participants for different elements of the
project. A meeting schedule for public participation on the different project
elements.
Schedule:Month 2-ongoing
Task 3:Conduct meetings of the Washington Square Task Force,and make
community presentations on project elements throughout project process. A task
force would be formed of all key stakeholders: citizens, developers, property
owners,and public agency representatives.
Objectives:To carry out a public participation program that obtains cc.n1munity
and policy input throughout the project. The following agencies shall be involved
with the task force: ODOT, Metro,City of Beaverton, Tri-Met, DLCD,and
Washington County. Representatives from these agencies shall be approved by
the Washington Square Regional Center Project Management Group. City of
Tigard staff shall approve the Washington Square Task Force members.Task
Force members shall be expected to coordinate with their respective agencies
and/or constituents, in addition they shall be expected to participate in Task
Force meetings as reasonably expected.
Methodology:Conduct meetings and schedule presentations in the community
as appropriate for project elements. Maintain minutes of meetings and provicie
necessary follow-up to enhance public participation.
Personnel&Hours:John Spencer: 48 hours
Elaine Cogan: 48 hours
Beth Wemple:32 hours
Lloyd Lindley:48 hours
Products:Meeting agendas, meeting minutes and backup materials. Revisions
to materials. Meeting agendas will be made available to all meeting participants
one week prior to the meeting.
Schedule:Ongoing throughout the project.
5
Task 4: Develop and carry out technical advisory group meetings as appropriate,
to provide technical input on work program elements.
Objectives:To include the participation of relevant agencies in technical review
of work program elements.
Methodology: Identify appropriate agency staff to participate in technical
advisory groups. Establish meeting schedules based on work program
elements. Conduct meetings and update work program accordingly.
Personnel &Hours: John Spencer: 30 hours
Elaine Cogan: 15 hours
Beth Wemple: 30 hours
Lloyd Lindley:30 hours
Products: Meeting agendas,meeting minutes,meeting backup materials,and
correspondences. Meeting agendas and review materials will be made available
to all meeting participants one week prior to the meeting.
Schedule: Ongoing, as necessary, thrcughout the project.
Task 5: Hold public workshops.
Objectives: To provide opportunity for the general public to gain information
concerning the regional center and provide input to the planning process.
Methodology: Develop communication materials and conduct up to two public
workshops.
Personnel &Hours: John Spencer: 20 hours
Elaine Cogan: 20 hours
Beth Wemple: 16 hours
Lloyd Lindley: 16 hours
Products: Meeting agendas and meeting minutes.
Schedule: Ongoing,to be established by the public involvement plan.
Phase II:Boundary Definition and Data Collection
Task 1:Collect and review all existing; relevant land use and policy documents,
including,Metro Functional Plan,Tigard comprehensive plan,traffic studies,
transportation data,and transportation existing conditions data.
6
objective: To assemble all relevant information that may be useful in developing
the regional center plan,which may include maps,tables, and descriptions,(this
is not a complete list of all relevant information that may be used).
Methodology: City staff will collect background reports, maps,and data,and
compile an inventory list. Staff will also contact and collect reports, maps, and
data available from ether jurisdictions andcompile inventory. Staff will meet with
consultant team to review available information. Consulta,it team will review
background information and utilize in subsequent work as appropriate.
Personnel &Hours:
John Spencer: 8 hours
Beth Wemple: 8 hours
Lloyd Lindley: 8 hours
Products: Inventory list and minutes from team meeting.
Schedule: Months 2-3.
Task 2:With the involvement of the task force(s),define the regional center
boundary and study area.
objective: To define the boundary of the regional center areas of interest to the
regional center.
Methodology: City staff and consultants will work to build consensus among the
stakeholders regarding the boundary of the regional center and the areas of
interest to the regional center.
Personnel &Hours:Nadine Smith: 12 hours
John Spencer:20 hours
Beth Wemple: 10 hours
Products: Washington Square Regional Center boundary and areas of interest
Schedule: Months 2-3
Phase 111 DevelopmenVRedeveloi2ment oQportunitiom
Task 1: Conduct a detailed inventory of existing land uses including vacant land.
Objective: To understand existing uses and scale of development, and vacant
land available for development/redevelopment in the Regional Center area.
7
Methodology:Map existing uses and vacant lands in the Regional Center, using
City of Tigard and Metro inventories. Summarize extent of different uses in study
area. The consultant will develop maps with input from the City of Tigard's staff
GIS coordinator. Draft ordinance language will be used for modeling future
development patterns.
Personnel•&Hours:John Spencer:20 hours
Lloyd Lindley:20 hours
Products:GIS maps and data, illustrating existing uses and vacant lands in the
study area. Summary report on existing uses in study area.
Schedule:Mcnths 1-4
Task 2: Begin program to assess potential for development and redevelopment
in the short end longer term future based on desired development. This program
should include evaluation of institutional, open spaces, residential,and
commercial land uses for both short and longer term needs in the Regional
Center. At this point staff members and consultants will meet with commercial
interests in the area to discuss their future commercial redevelopment plans.
The team will also need to meet with representatives from Metzger school to
discuss the future of the school in the Washington Square area. Using GIS data
from Task 1, a GIS-based model will be developed to test various
development/redevelopment strategies identified regarding redevelopment plans.
Objective: To learn development and redevelopment potential in the Regional
Center area and to improve the GIS modeling capabilities for this area.
Methodology:Using information from Task 1, develop several
redevelopment/development strategies, using the GIS-based model to test the
various strategies. This modeling strategy will include retail and commercial
opportunities,housing options, locations of gateways, open spaces and
institutional uses. It will also identify constraints to development,particularly
water quality issues and interviewing major land owners in the area about their
redevelopment interests.
Personnel&Hours:John Spencer:40 hours
Lloyd Lindley:20 hours
Products: Summary report with tables and maps depicting development and
redevelopment potential.
Schedule:Months 4-6
a
OIC.
Task 3: Develop urban design concepts for the regional center which consider
the mix and intensity of land uses,multi-modal transportation opportunities,npen
spaces,and their functional relationships. Analyze how these concepts meet
evaluation criteria established by the Washington Square Regional Task Force,
which will include conformance to Metro Functional Plan standards.
Objective: To prepare urban design visions for the regional center and select a
preferred urban design plan.
Methodology: Utilizing information from task 1 and task 2,the consulting team,
with task participation, will develop urban design concept diagrams which
illustrate arrangement of land use and general intensity,multi-modal access and
circulation, open spaces and other features. Consultant will evaluate urban
design concepts against project objectives. The Washington Square Task Force
and Technical Advisory Group will review and refine the preferred concept. (This
task depends on a thorough inventory output from Phase 2,Task 1).
Personnel&Hours: John Spencer:30 hours
Beth Wemple: 8 hours
Lloyd Lindley:50 hours
Products: Urban design concept diagrams(up to three),sketches(up to six),
and sections(up to ten), and a brief memorandum analyzing concepts and
description of the preferred urban design plan.
Schedule: Months 4-6
Task 4: Develop design standards for public improvements and the public
realm,which will be developed concurrently with the Washington Square
Transportation Master Plan.
Objective: To define standards for public and private streets and accesses
within the regional center and to define design standards for public and private
development within regional center.
Methodology:The consulting team will develop draft design standards based on
the preferred urban design concept for the regional center and the analysis and
recommendations developed for the transportation and parking plans for the
area. These design standards will be developed in consultation with the task
force and property owners and will be evaluated and be refined.
Personnel&Hours: John Spencer:30 hours
Beth Wemple:8 hours
Lloyd Lindley:60 hours
9
Products: Draft and final design standards,supporting plans or diagrams(up to
ten).
Schedule: Months"-6
Phase IV•Washington Square Regional Center Transportation Master Plan
and Parking Plan
Task 1: Existing Conditions:
To establish existing conditions in the WSRC,review previously performed
transportation studies in the study area. Summarize existing conditions and
deficiencies from a mu!ti-modal perspective. Existing conditions for the system
will be based primarily on available studies and reports and augmented by field
observations by KAI staff. Limited additional existing conditions analyses will be
performed. It is anticipated that models and analyses previously developed for
the City of Tigard will be made available to Kittelson&Associates in electronic
format. The existing conditions memorandum will be relatively brief,
documenting existing conditions and identifying critical locations that might be
conflict points as the plan and vision for the regional center develops. The
performance measures used in this analysis will be those utilized in studies
previously performed in Tigard.
Objective:To develop an understanding of the existing conditions of all modes
in the WSRC area .
Methodology: To establish existing conditions in the WSRC, review previously
performed transportation studies in the study area. Summarize existing
conditions and deficiencies from a multi-modal perspective. Existing conditions
for the system will be based primarily on available studies and reports and
augmented by field observations by KAI staff. Limited additional existing
conditions analyses will be performed. It is anticipated that models and analyses
previously developed for the City of Tigard will be made available to Kittelson &
Associates in electronic format. The existing conditions memorandum will be
relatively brief, documenting existing conditions and identifying critical locations
that might be conflict points as the plan and vision for the regional center
develops. The performance measures used in this analysis will be those utilized
in studies previously performed in Tigard.
Personnel& Hours:John Spencer: 8 hours
Beth Wemple: 104 hours
Lloyd Lindley: 4 hours
Products: An existing conditions/opportunities/constraints summary memo will
be developed. This memo will document observed and previously evaluated
conditions for all modes of transportation.
10
Schedule: Months 1-7
Task 2:Future Conditions:
Task 2A-Modeling,Analysis and Plan
The future conditions analysis will be performed utilizing the travel demand
model data previously developed by CKS and Metro for the City of Tigard.
Tigard will confirm that the model assumptions are consistent with the regional
center requirements established by Metro. Kittelson will work with Metro to
revise transportation analysis zones, mode split 4nd base network assumptions
as appropriate to reflect future regional center scenarios. Metro will perform all
of the travel demand modeling as requested by Kittelson. It is assumed that
Metro will provide the appropriate information to develop year 2017 forecasts.
Since the Washington Square Area has been designated as a regional center by
Metro(and therefore it is accepted that land use composition will change
substantially from current comprehensive plan designations)-a future conditions
no-build analysis will not be performed. There is no no-build scenario. With
direction from Kittelson and the project team, Metro will model up to three(3)
transportation/land use scenarios for the study area. These will reflect the
regional center vision developed by the project team and Task Force. It is
anticipated that:his will be an iterative process resulting in up to six(6)model
runs. The vehicle performance measure for this analysis will be consistent with
the two-hour peak operating standards outlined in the Metro Functional Plan.
The future vehicle transportation system will be developed based on link level
operating conditions with a sensitivity analysis for over-capacity conditions at
critical key intersections. Complementary pedestrian, bicycle and transit
recommendations will be developed. A brief functional review of the
recommended improvements will be performed concurrent with alt3matives
development to ensure that they are feasible. The feasibility performance
measures will be established by the Task Force and project team during
alternatives development. It is assumed that aerial and topographic mapping will
be made available from the City of Tigard.
Objective:To develop an understanding of the future transportation conditions
in the WSRC for all modes of transportation.
Methodology: To establish future conditions in the WSRC, using travel demand
model data previously developed by DKS and Metro for the City of Tigard. With
direction from Kittelson and the project team, Metro will model up to three (3)
transportation/land use scenarios for the study area. These will reflect the
regional center vision developed by the project team and Task Force. It is
anticipated that this will be an iterative process resulting in up to six (6) model
runs. The future vehicle transportation system will be developed based on link
level operating conditions with a sensitivity analysis for over-capacity conditions
at critical key intersections. Complementary pedestrian, bicycle and transit
11
recommendations will be developed. A brief functional review of the
recommended improvements will be performed concurrent with alternatives
development to ensure that they are feasible. The feasibility performance
measures will be established by the Task Force and project tear: during
alternatives development. It is assumed that aerial and topographic mapping will
be made available from the City of Tigard.
Personnel& Hours:John Spencer:20 hours
Beth Wemple:256 hours
Lloyd Lindley: 10 hours
Products:A memo outlining the future transportation scenarios for all modes of
transportation.
Schedule: Months 1-7
Task 21B-Alternatives Analysis Memo and List®f improvements
Once the modeling analysis has been completed, alternative scenarios will be
developed than will demonstrate transportation scenarios for all modes of
transportation.
0
Objective:To develop an understanding of the future transportation options
available for all travel modes in the WSRC.
Mr
Methodology: Using the future conditions model, scenarios for all travel modes
will be developed.
Personnel &Hours: Beth Wemple:76 hours
Products:A memo outlining the future transportation scenarios for all modes of
transportation.
Schedule: Months 1-7
Task 3-Parking Strategy
Our review of existing parking conditions in the study area will be based on data
provided by Washington Square,the City of Tigard, and surrounding land
owners. If insufficient data is available,aerial photography will be utilized. The
results of the existing conditions analysis will be limited to a)an estimation of
parking supply by land use category and by parking zone within the study area;
and b)an estimation of parking utilization by land use category and zone.
12
To ensure that this there is adequate parking to accommodate future increased
densities and intensities in the Regional Center and meet related Transportation
Planning Rule requirements, Kittelson&Associates will review future parking
supply and demand information provided to us by the project team. Our review
will provide assistance in identifying parking strategies(i.e. increased transit,
shared parking,and parking management)to decrease area wide parking
demand. Our review will also generally assess the impacts of parking supply
location on the surrounding transportation system. We will not generate future
parking supply or demand forecasts.
Objective: Ensure that there is adequate parking to accommodate future
increased densities and intensities in the Regional Center. To meet related TPR
and UGMFP Titie 2 requirements.
Methodology: Review available research to determine peak parking demand
levels for different land use categories and for different peak periods (Christmas,
Friday evening, Saturday mid-day...). The project team and Task Force will
determine peak condition to be considered in the ar.3iysis. Based on the
selected peak period, Kittelson will review aerial photography of the study area
during the appropriate peak conditions. The assessment will determine the
following: a)an estimation of parking supply by land use category and by parking
zone within the study area;and b)an estimation of parking utilization by land use
category and zone. The evaluation will allow us to determine the range of
parking ratios needed for each land use category and zone within the study area.
Based on the land use and transportation alternatives developed by the project
team, Kittelson will estimate future parking demand by land use category and
zone. This will include strategies to reduce parking demand such as increased
transit, shared parking, and parking management (review existing comparable
land uses). This will allow the project team to develop parking alternatives within
the study area.
Existing parking within the regional center will be inventoried and analyzed
relative to land use, finction (tenant, visitor, employees, etc.) and access.
Parking needs will be estimated based on anticipated growth within the regional
center. Parking strategies will be identified to optimize the utilization or carking
spaces including transit, sharer? Parking, and alternative modes. A parking plan
will be developed whidl considers parking location and function, structured,
surface, and on-street parking, and parking access. Parking management
opportunities will also be assessed which consider parking pricing, employer
incentives, adjacent neighborhood impacts and strategies.
Personnel&Hours:Beth Wemple: 66 hours
AM John Spencer:40 hours
Lloyd Lindley:40 hours
13
Products: We will prepare a technical memorandum documenting the data
analysis and research and describing the parking strategies considered.
Schedule:Months 1-7
Phase V Washington Square Regional Center limplamentation
Task 1: Draft Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan amendments that
provide mixed use zoning categories and standards,support higher density,and
intensity development, and require specific design standards. Development of
the Implementation Pian will occur simultaneously with finalization of the
Transportation Master Plan phase.
Objectives: To develop appropriate regulations to implement mixed use zoning,
higher densities and intensities and appropriate design standards for application
in the City's Regional Center area.
Methodology: Write draft ordinance amendments incorporating relevant
information from previous tasks.
Personnel&Hours: John Spencer: 100 hours
Beth Wemple:8 hours
Lloyd Lindley:40 hours
Products: Draft ordinances for review and recommendation by Planning
Commission(s)of respective jurisdictions.
Schedule:Months 10-12
Task 2:Complete public hearing process with adoption of Comprehensive Plan
and Zoning Ordinance amendments. Consultant will indicate necessary
comprehensive plan and development code amendments. City of Tigard staff
will draft plan and development code amendments.
Objectives: To have Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan amendments
related to mixed use zoning in the Regional Center adopted by City Council.
Methodology: Schedule public meetings and hearings. Public meetings may
be organized and held according to Regional Center sub-areas. Provide public
notice of meetings. Provide draft proposals to the public. Hold public meetings
and worksessions with the Planning Commission and City Council.
Personnel&Hours:John Spencer:24 hours
Elaine Cogan:24 hours
14
Beth Wemple: 16 hours
Lloyd Lindley: 16 hours
Products:Adopted ordinance amendments.
Schedule: Months 10-12
15
SCHEDULE OF LABOR COSTS AND EXPENSES-WASHINGTON SQUARE REGIONAL CENTER
Team Spencer& Kittelson& Lloyd D. Cogan Owens (DBE) Totals
Kupper Assoc. Lindley Cogan
Hourly Rate $100.00 $79.00 $90.00 $105.00 $60.00 NA
Project Tasks Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs
I.Public Involvement Program
1. Establish plan $800.00 $4,200.00 $5,000.00
2. Form Task Force $800.00 $840.00 $360.00 $2,000.00
3. Task Force Meetings(12) $4,800.00 $2,528.00 $4,320.00 $5,040.00 $3,600.00 $20,288.00
4. TAC Meetings(10) $3,000.00 $2,370.00 $2,700.00 $1,575.00 $2,400.00 $12,045.00
5. Public Workshops(2) $2,000.00 $1,264.00 $1,440.00 $2,100.00 $960.00 $7,764.00
11. Boundary Definition and Data Collection
1. Collect and review all data $800.00 $632.00 $720.00 $480.00 $2,632.00
2. Define RC boundary $2,000.00 $790.00 $900.00 $600.00 $4,290.00
III. Developmem/Redevelopment Opportunities
1. Inventory land uses $2,000.00 $1,800.00 $2,400.00 $6,200.00
2. Assess development/ $4,000.00 $1,800.00 $2,400.00 $8,200.00
redevelopment potential
Urban design concepts $3,000.00 $632.00 $4,500.00 $2,400.00 $10,532.00
VIrDesign Standards $3,000.00 $632.00 $5,400.00 $480.00 $9,512.00
IV. WSRC Transportation and Parking Plan
1. Existing conditions $800.00 $8,216.00 $360.00 $9,376.00
Z� Future condlttotts•ruadeE
analysss andptan(BY CJ1CI}
2.13 Future conditions-alter. $6,004.00 - $960.00 $6,964.00
analysis memo and improvements
3_ Develop Parking Strategy $4,000.00 $5,214.00 $3,600.00 $12,814.00
V. WSRC Implementation
1. Draft ordinance and plan $10,000.00 $632.00 $3,600.00 $14,232.00
amendments
2_ Public hearing process(4) $2,400.00 $1,264.00 $1,440.00 $2,520.00 $7,624.00
Project Management $14,400.00 $14,400.00
Subtotal,Labor $57,800.00 $30,178.00 $32,580.00 $16,275.00 $17,040.00 $153,873.00
Expenses $1,567.00 $3,000.00 $500.00 $500.00 $560.00 $6,127.00
Totals,Labor&Expenses $59,367.00 $33,178.00 .033,080.00 $16,775.00 $17,600.00 $160,000.00
and Total $160,000.00
February 9,1998 TGM PROJECT BUDGET SUMMARY