Resolution No. 96-62 CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON
RESOLUTION NO.961Oa
A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION TO THE CIN OF TIGARD OF THE TERRITORY AS
Y DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A AND ILLUSTRATED IN EXHIBIT B(ZCA 96-0005).
WHEREAS,the Tigard City Council held a hearing on September 24,1996,to consider the annexation of
one parcel consisting of 0.33 acres located at the Southeast comer of Johnson Street and 106th Drive.
WHEREAS,the proposed annexation constitutes a minor boundary change under Boundary Commission
law ORS 199.410 to 199.519,and
.I WHEREAS,the Tigard City Council is authorized by ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B)to initiate an annexation upon
.i receiving consent in writing from a majority of the electors registered in the territory proposed to be
r'- annexed and written consent from owners of more than half the land in the territory proposed to be
annexed;and
WHEREAS,the property which lies within the boundary of the Washington County Enhanced Sheriffs
Patrol District,Washington County Urban Roads Maintenance District,Washington County Street Ligt t:rl0 "
District#1 and the Washington County Vector Control District would,by operation of ORS 199.510,be
automatically withdrawn from those districts immediately upon completion of the annexation.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that:
} .Section 1: The City Council,pursuant to ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B), hereby initiates proceedings {
for annexation to the City of Tigard of the territory described in Exhibit A and
' illustrated in Exhibit B.
Section 2: The City Council hereby approves the proposed annexation and requests that the
Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission approve the
proposal and effect it as soon as possible. f;
" Section 3: The City Recorder is hereby directed to file certified copies of the resolution with
the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission at once.
PASSED:
This 6 day o tayor--C�fty.l rd s"
EST:
y Recorder-City of Tigard V
r Date
1AC1TYW1DE1RES=A96-65.RES "
RESOLUTION NO.961�'�
Page 1 _ t.:
4
Y
k STAFF REPORT 's
t.w) September 24,1996 EXHIBIT A
r
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
TIGARD TOWN HALL
13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD
TIGARD,OREGON 97223
A.' FACTS {
1. General Information
CASE: Zone Change Annexation 96-0005
�'r'by,
REQUEST: To annex one parcel of .33 acres of unincorporated
Washington County land to the City of Tigard and to change
the zone from Washington County R-5 to City of Tigard R-4.5. yr
APPLICANT: Steve Sanders ;
12390 SW 106th Ave
Tigard,OR 97223 {$
OWNERS: Same t
LOCATION: At Southeast corner of Johnson Street and 106th Drive - vs
„ WCTM 2S1 3 AA,lot 1916(see vicinity exhibit map). �r + ,
2. Vicinisy Information
—
Properties to the north,south,east and west are in Washington County and zoned
R-5. These parcels have single family residences on them.
3. Bac ground Information k '
rs
The applicant approached the city with a request to annex the property. No
previous applications have been reviewed by the city relating to this property.
k „
4. Site Information and Proposal Description
The site is sloped to the north with a gentle rise toward the southern end.There is
one single family house on the southern portion of the site. The site is located on
�r„
t
3 the corner of SW Johnson St.and SW 100th,Avenue which are both local streets.
The site has approximately 100 feet of frontage along SW Johnson Street and 150
feet along SW 106th Avenue.
The applicant has requested that the site be annexed to the city by means of the
double majority method. Representing the owners of more than half the land
(100%)and a majority of the registered electors(100%)of the area proposed to be
annexed,the applicant has initiated this action through his written consent. The
applicant intends to obtain sewer service after annexation to the city.
The proposal includes the request to initiate annexation to the city and to change
the zone only on the property. Because the property is in the city's Active Planning
Area, it has already been assigned a Tigard Comprehensive Plan designation,
,j
which is Low Density Residential.
5. Aggnry Comments
The Engineering Division,Tigard Police and Water departments,Tualatin Valley *r,;
Fire and Rescue District,PGE and General Telephone have reviewed the proposal -'M
and have no objections. No other comments were received at the time of this '
report.
B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1,
i 10.1.1, 10.1.2,and 10.1.3; and Tigard Community Development Code chapters
18.136 and 18.138.
Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of
the Comprehensive Plan based on the following findings:
6 �
1. Policy 2.1.1, requiring an ongoing citizen involvement program,is satisfied
because the Central and West CITs and surrounding property owners have
been notified of the hearing and public notice of the hearing has been
published.
2. Policy 10.11-1, requiring adequate service capacity delivery to annexed
parcels, is satisfied because the Police Department, Engineering,,Water
Department, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District have reviewed the
proposal and indicate that adequate services are available and may be
extended to accommodate the affected property.
2 ,
k:
3. Policy 10.1.2, boundary criteria for annexations, is satisfied because the
Police Department has been notified of this request and has no objection;
the affected land is located within the city's urban planning area and is
contiguous to the city boundary; and adequate services are available to
accommodate the property.
4. Policy 10.1.4,zoning designation,is satisfied because the affected parcel
will be designated as R-4.5,which is the most closely conforming zoning
designation to the existing Washington County zoning of R-5.
Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portans of
the Community Development Code based on the following findings:
1. Code Section 18.136,030, requiring approval standards for annexation
proposals,is satisfied because:
a. Service providers have indicated that adequate facilities and services
are available and have sufficient capacity to serve the affected site.
b. Applicable comprehensive plan policies and code provisions have
been reviewed and satisfied.
C. The zoning designation of R-4.5 most closely conforms to the county
designation of R-5 while implementing the city's Comprehensive i
Plan designation of Low Density Residential.
{'v
d. The determination that the affected property is an established area is
based on the standards in Chapter 18.138 of the code.
2. Code Section 18.138,providing standards for the classification of annexed ;
land, is satisfied because the property shall be designated as an
established area on the development standard areas map of the ,
comprehensive plan.
s
C. RECOMMENDATION
r
Based on the findings noted above,the planning staff recommends approval of
ZCA 96-0005.
t
l_LLRPLNW EMZCA96 05 STF '
k
i
3
I I I1-T-T
--,
LU
co
o j I JOH SON ST.
- IT-
���
I ERROL ST. T
co
CL
l i
EXIUBI1"I3°.... /� µexanonuaozorve cwwce Fsrn�-....
ZCA96-0005 /.J\\1 c H,YRsioGrY -0s
Sanders Atinemiti 7 M1I M IN nGPRD CIN UG9115