Resolution No. 88-101 C1ly OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO. 88-SOI
A RESOLUTi.ON ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 10 APPROVE BOIH A PLANNL".)
_ DEVELOPMENF CONCEPTUAL PLAN (PD R8-010 AND A VARIANCE (V 88--27) AND ALSO TO
REMAND THE PROPOSAL 10���1HE PLANNING COMMlSE;ION fOR PLANNED DEVEL-OPME:'T
DETAILED PLAN APPROVAL AND SITE DEVE.LOPMENI- RkV£)_W APPROVAL (,-."DR 88-17). THE
PLANNING COiWPtISE 1:01U's PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSAL SOBJCC`i- TO CE RI A1
CONDITIONS WAS APPEALED TO THE CITY (JOUNCIL. THE COUNCIL'S ACTION AMENDS
CERTAIN (A THOSE APPEALED CONDII MS. AND REQUIRES THE DETAILED PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO BE REV:EEWFI) 8Y THE: PLANNING COMMISSION.
WHEREAS, Tod De Kanter, repr•esentiug CBO Company, applied fur Site Development
Review appruval, Planned Development approval, and a Variance to the Community
Development Code standard for number of driveways required for a multi--family
development of greater than 100 units; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposal on September 6, 1988,
ar,d approved the proposal subject to several conditions including a condition
that the number of dwelling units be limited to 100 units rather than the 130
units proposed and also including a condition that required the applicants to
submit a revised site Elan for detailed Planned 'Development Review; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's decision was appealed to the City Council
by the CEPH Company on grounds that 1) The Planning Commission did not prup,rrly
apply the Planned Development section of the Community Development Code -
Chapter 18.80; 2) that the number of units allowed by the Commission is
inconsistent with the intent of the Plan for land zoned k--12 (PD); 3) that
the imposition of curtain planting and fencing requirements by the Commission
" exceeded the standard- established by the. Community DeveloC
pment ode; and 4)
that the findings coritained in the Commission's Final Order do riot: support Lhe
decision as the applicant has gully satisfied all applicable sections of the
Plan and Code; and
WHER€A a public hearing was held by the City Council on October 10, 1988, to
review the Commission's order relative to the proposal;
NOW. THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that.:
Section 1: Planning Commission Final Order No. 88-10 PC is modified as
follows at D. -- Decision on Page 10:
DECISION
The City Council grants conceptual approval of Planned
Development PD 98-04, Site Development Revi,,w 88-88-17, and
Variance V 88-27. A detailed plan shall be submitted within one
year, for Planning Commission review, that includes the
following:
1. A grading plan for the developed portion of the site. Cross
slopes in parking areas shall be reduced to approximately 6
r ,__..r- _•!he' - possible.
2. The single driveway connection to SW 109th Avenue shall be
designed in conformance with the recommendations of the
applicant's traffic report.
RESOLU'TIM NO. 89-/01_
Page I
3. A land scapi rig plan shall be submitted fur Planning Commission
rreviow and approval. the plan shall provide location and
Species specific information on proposed landscaping ❑;ater'ial.
As a guideline, of this plan should pr-eserve a minimum of 130
trees that arc 6-inches in diameter or greater within tho
ciLvoloped porEion or the pr•ojoct. Tho plan shall provide for
Street l.r'[:,y�; vain -tho oi,.. c. 109th o,__n_ funtac_a
and for'
additi.::na1 per'i.motcr• buffering along the northern border, of the
site from the bltAff near- Pacific Highway to 109th Avenue. The
eastern boundary shall also be buffered. Said porimot.er
buffering shall consist of a 6 foot chain link fence and
vegetative screening or a 6 foot site obscuring fence at the
option of adjoining property owner s. Said fencing sha1.1 be
installed prior to issuance of building permits.
4. A revised site plan shall he submitted which 1) pr-ovides for' a
IT;ir.i:au::r of one appropriately _i,od and located designated
handicapped parking spaco for every 50 standard parking spaces;
2) relocates the proposed sign outside of Lho -eyuir�d v..
clearance area; 3) has a maximum of 130 unite, aild 4) provid s
for- a fire hydrant tO be iocatcn'l within 250 feet of all first.
floor, exterior portions of all buildings unless the buildings
ar-e to bo provided with automatic spr'inkier-s.
5. A detailed tr-ee protection plan shall be submitted for' Planning
Commission approval which includes locations and types of trees
to be retained, an arbor.isL's for methods of
protoct:ing these trees as well as trees on abutting properties
durnr c•.or,struc,tion of the proposed apartment-
iarid also for
maintenance of the long--ter'm health of the trees. Ttie
Commission directs that the ar,bor•ist shall protect abutting
pr'c)perty owner's trees. "F he treos to he sauce; shalt be
proteci.ed during coristr,uctiori by fenc,rig or similar, means
approvoil t;y the Planning Division. No Site gr•adi.ng, clearing,
or• tree removal shall occur- prior, to satisfaction of this
condition.
Section 2: The City Council waives the: automatic review of the Planning
Commission's decision regarding the detailed plan subject to the
Council's right to call up the decision for review if such is
deemed necessary.
PASSED: This cx_�(f n day of __C'CY-1i2 -k— _�,, 1908.
Mayor — City of Tigard
ATTEST:
IT
Deputy Recorder -- City of T; urd
APPRg7E¢-A&-TO FORM:
/-y r 'i
--�
. It
Ca Recorder
Date
br/7571D
RESOLUTION NO. 88— lt��
Page 2