Loading...
Resolution No. 82-16 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 82- /(a RESOLUTION ADOPTING A FINAL ORDER IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF JOHN SKOURTES, FILE NO. V 10-81, REVERSING THE ACTION OF THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION, ENTERING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The Tigard City Council heard the above-entitled appeal at its regular Council meeting of February 8, 1982. The only participant was the appellant, who also appeared before the Tigard Planning Commission. The Council makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT in this matter: 1. The applicant has requested a side yard variance of 10 feet, from the 20 foot side yard requirement of Section 18.84.040(2) of the Tigard Municipal Code, pursuant to Section 18.76.020 of said Code. 2. The subject parcel is described as Washington County Tax Map Parcel 251-12A (Railroad Right-of-Way) located at the southeast corner of S. W. Bonita Road at S. W. 74th Avenue. The configuration of the site is set forth on the map on the Notice of Public Hearing in this matter found in the case file. 3. The subject site is oddly shaped and of a unique confi- guration for the area, based upon the map referred to above and u+ the applicant's testimony (Transcript pp. 2-4, Item C, letter of John Skourtes dated October 27, 1981 to Elizabeth Newton) and a, the Council believes this uncontested evidence. 4. The size, shape and configuration are not the result of circumstances over which the applicant has control, but are circumstances which have resulted from the historical configuration of the parcel since 1902 (based upon the letter by applicant to the Tigard Planning Commission, dated October 23, 1981, Item 1) . 5. The development of the site for any use allowed by TMC Section 18.48.010 is precluded by the depth of the lot, which, coupled with the 25 foot setback imposed by the Burlington Northern Railway (see map attached to letter of applicant to the City Council dated February 3, 1982) , leaves only 30 feet of area which can be developed. The Council believes the testimony of the applicant and, based on that testimony and its own experience, determines that the applicant would, if this application were denied, be denied any use of the subject parcel, substantially differing his situation from that of other owners in the C-3 zor: and in the area. t � RESOLUTION NO. 82- _ 6. The Council has considered the purposes of the Tigard d` Zoning Ordinance as set forth in TMC 18.04.020 and finds them C generally met by the application, as follows: a. The variance encourages the most appropriate use of land in that it allows C-3 uses permissible on this site to be undertaken. The Council reiterates that to deny the variance would not allow use of this site for any C-3 purpose and would render the subject site unusable and an eyesore. b. By allowing a use at all, the variance promotes conservation and stability of property values. C. The large setbacks from Bonita Road (40 feet) and the railroad tracks (25 feet) , the conditions regarding parking and other matters set forth in Exhibit "A", all aid the city to provide fire and police protection and lessen street congestion. d. Despite the reduction of the setback lines, there will be sufficient light and air for any uses on the site. e. No population will be housed on this site and the uses allowed in the C-3 zone are of low intensity and an extension of the manufacturing uses in the area. Therefore, we find the citywide goals of orderly growth and prevention of undue concentrations of population to be met. f. The grant of this variance will have no effect on any public facilities mentioned in Section 18.04.020(8) as no more intense use of the site will be undertaken. g. Because of the above, and the fact that the uses proposed are in accordance with the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, there is assured conformity with public health, safety, convenience and general welfare. 7. There was no contrary evidence to petitioner's unrebutted assertions that the grant of a variance was not injurious toproperty values in the zone or the vicinity of the use, nor any showing that a conflict existed with the objectives of any city development plan or policy. 8. A 10-foot side yard setback is necessary to render the subject site usable for any C-3 use. Any less of a variance would not enable the land to be used; any more would be unecessary to accommodate C-3 uses allowable in this zone. 9. There are no State-wide Planning Goals applicable to this case except the following: a. Goal 1 which is fulfilled by the public hearing processes in this case. RESOLUTION NO. 82-_L4_ b, Goal 2, under which conformity of the Industrial designation of the Plan is furthered by the grant of this variance. C. Goal 9 which is furthered by allowing the use of designated odd-shaped lot. an industrially g d. Goal 11 and Goal 14 which boundaryfulfare1toeallow for reinforcement of the urban 5 ublic facilities already urban-type industrial uses with p provided. 10. The conditions on the use publictforth service1n Exhibit and facilities will assist the city in meeting p mitigating its effect needs emanating from the proposed use and on surrounding persons or property. owing CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: The Council adopts the foll 1, Based on Finding No. 3, the Council has determined that the subject site has extraordinary conditions, due to its size and shape, that do not apply generally to parcels in the sameura- vicinity. Based on Finding No. 4, the size, shape and t under the Council concludes, are not under tion of the subject site, predecessors in interest. the control of the applicant a his p and Municipal Code The application, therefore, satisfies Tigard Section 18.76.020(1) . 2. Based on Findings 3 through 5, the Council concludes d th that the uniqueness of the site anermitted under tTMC 018.85010a possible use p would not allow any p licant has proved to the reservation ofsatisfaction f and, therefore, the app r ' the same as is possessed by other the Council that the variance is necessary for p a property right substantially property owners in the C-3 zone and in the vicinity. the 3, Based on Finding No. 6, the Council concludes a that and Municipal Code and, based on Finding authorization of this variances is not detrimental to the p P of Title 18 of the Tig injurious to property No. 7, that the variance issue would nro ertys located, or in the zone or vicinity in which ect pr of any city development otherwise detrimental to the a al Code. plan or policy. Therefore, we conclude that the variance complies with Section 18.76.020(3) of the Tigard municipal 4, Based on Finding No. 8, the Council concludes that the nted is the minimum necessary to alleviate the application prese Council identifies as the inability to use hardship which the bject site with a 30-foot wide buildable area the su . 5, Based on Finding No. 9, the Council concludes Goals alsthatande application satisfies applicable State-wide Planning that c other Goal is applicable to this matter. RESOLUTION NO. 6. In reviewing the applicable Comprehensive Plan for this site, the Council finds no policies therein which mitigate either for or against the proposal before the Council. ORDER It is, therefore, ORDERED that, based on the above Finlings and Conclusion, the application for a variance in this matter be, and the same hereby is, approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A". It is FURTHER ORDERED that the applicant be notified of the entry of this Order. PASSED: Thisa.2 day of e L -wc�� ti , 1982, by the Council of the City of Tigard. a � � i - City of Tigard ATTEST: C'Jty Recorder Cof Tigard e i k RESOLUTION NO. 82-_4�_ EXHIBIT "A" i + i CONDITIONS { 1. Nonremonstrance agreement signed by Burlington Northern agreeing not to remonstrant against the formation of a local improvement agreement to city standards on SW 74th Avenue and SW Bonita prior to issuance of building permit. } p 2. Site Design Review shall be required. C 3. Minor land partition shall be approved by the City and recorded with Washington County prior to issuance of building permit. 4. Direct access from the 74th Avenue to the building shall be prohibited. 5. No access to SW Bonita. 6. Dedicationof right-of-way on S.W. 74th as necessary to accommodate any realignment of the 'S' curve due to design. S d' li