Resolution No. 79-46 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO. 79- ,V4
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING RECOMMENDATIONS TO FURTHER THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
HOUSING PLAN OF THE CITY OF TIGARD.
Acknowledging its earlier passage of the housing plan of the City
of Tigard and its commitment to that plan and to satisfy at the earliest
possible time the obligation to accomplish its planning and development
work in accord with the goals and guidelines of the Land Conservation and
Development Commission of the State of Oregon, and having received the
recommendations of the planning staff of the City of Tigard with regard to
methods of implementing the adopted housing plan, the City Council by this
resolution expresses its intention to implement the housing plan by the
methods recited in the attached memorandum.
PASSED: This _2,�_ day of ,. 1979.
', OF-TIGARD
ATTEST:
�i
CITY RECORDER; CIT
'F TIGARD
�71
i
RESOLUTION NO. 79-,4/(,_
Housing Implementation
ITEM #D
Location of Assisted Housing
Applicable Policy (from adopted Housing Plan)
Policy 8. Low and moderate income housing units shall be located ac-
cording to appropriate standards (eg., not concentrations
of undue size, to minimize impacts on existing neighbor-
hoods, etc.).
Findings
1. The City of Tigard currently has no guidelines to help public agencies
and private individuals in selecting suitable locations for new
assisted housing.
Implementation Recommendations
Private, public, and quasi-public providers of assisted housing should be
urbed to use the following criteria when selecting locations:
1. The candidate sites should meet the following minimum or threshold
criteria:
A. The proposed housing density is permitted outright or is a con-
ditional use according to the existing zone designation on the site.
C. For projects intended to house families, rather than the elderly,
there should be no other assisted housing for families within
mile of the site.
Housing Implementation
ITEM #E
Tigard's Fair Share of Low Income Housing
Applicable Policy (from adopted Housing Plan)
Policy 14. Accommodate for the provision of subsidized housing assistance
to meet Tigard's fair share of local/regional needs.
Findings
1. The CRAG Board of Directors will soon adopt a Housing Opportunity
Plan (HOP) for the Portland area. The HOP will consider housing
needs for the entire region and thereby will help improve the al-
location of funds for those requiring assistance. Participation in a HOP
by a local jurisdiction will make it, and the region, eligible for ad-
ditional federal funds (from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development) under various programs.
2. In the past, local jurisdictions seeking federal funds under some
HUD programs were required to prepare their own Housing Assistance
Plan (HAP) that estimated the number of local households needing hous-
ing assistance and set target goals for meeting that need. The City
of Tigard prepared such a HAP in 1976 as part of the process of applying
for the Housing and Community Development Block Grant funds which were
used to install storm sewers and bikepaths on Tigard and Greenburg.
3. Participation in the HOP will be one of the factors considered by LCDC
when it reviews Tigard's Housing Plan (and implementing actions) for
compliance with Goal #10 (Housing).
4. The HOP being developed by CRAG estimates the "fair share" of the
region's needy households for the counties and largest cities only.
However, Tigard's adopted Housing Policy 414 referring to "fair share"
is not precise enough to guide the City in determining its general
responsibility as a participant in the HOP.
5. To estimate the City of Tigard's implied general "fair-share" of needy
households under the draft HOP, which should approximate the targets
and fund allocations established by the Housing authority of Washington
County, staff used the figures developed for Hillsboro and Beaverton.
The HOP needy household fair shares estimated for those two larger cities
were compared with their respective populations in 1978. The average of
these two ratios (.106) was then applied to an estimate of the current
population in the Tigard Plan Area (20,000). The resulting estimate of
current needy households for the entire plan area (2120) compares well
with the 1976 HAP estimate developed independently (1903) and an updated
HAP estimate based on the intervening overall -population increase (2302).
Page 2
If this ratio, developed from data for Beaverton and Hillsboro, is applied
to the current City population, there are approximately 1272 needy
households for which Tigard should be responsible if it agrees to par-
ticipate in the HOP. This figure is somewhat lower than the rough
estimate made in the 1976 HAP (1476).
Implementation Recommendation
1. The City should agree to participate in the Housing Opportunity Plan.
Housing Implementation
ITEM #F
Unnecessary Standards or Restrictions
Applicable Policies (from adopted Housing Plan)
Policy 11. Review and revise the subdivision and zoning codes to ascertain
the presence of any unduly restrictive provisions which could
significantly increase costs while providing negligible benefits.
Policy 13. Accelerate the review process for approval of development proposals
where the quality of the review is not adversely affected.
Findings
1. In recent months various steps have been taken by the Planning Department
to streamline the review process for permit applications. These include:
is
A. Development of operations/procedures manuals for each of the permits
processed by the department (not yet completed).
B. "Fast-tracking" of the review process, where feasible.
C. Review of the zoning and subdivision codes for possible revisions
to reduce unnecessary delays. This analysis, currently being
conducted by a consultant, will also include an evaluation of the
,i potential for a "one-stop" permit system.
2. The proposal to permit rolled curbs was investigated by the Planning
Department, which was advised by the head of the Engineering Division
(John Hagman) that they posed several problems:
A. The street gutter along the edge of the curb is eliminated after
the first overlay is instylled (about 5 years).
B. The City's street sweepers are ineffectual along rolled curbs.
C. Rolled curbs are structurally inadequate because of a shallow
base and raised gutter. In the City's experience they are readily
made dysfunctional as use drives them into the ground (and rotates
them) as on Fir Loop in NPO #5, for instance.
D. Rolled curbs extruded by machine (eg., Viemount Ct. in NPO #3) are
apparently as costly as standard curbs given their quality control
difficulties.
1
3. The proposal to move utility lines outside the paved area of streets
(and thereby reduce costs for dirt hauling and backfill rock) is
Generally endorsed by the Engineering Division as follows:
....._._.>_-. �_
Page 2
A. This change of requirements will be a good idea with respect to
telephone, electricity, natural gas, and water lines.
B. Natural gas and electric utilities require, ncvertheless, that the
right-of-way be graded to certain standards.
C. The U.S.A. requires the location of sewer lines within 5 feet of
the street centerline.
D. Storm sewers should be located under the gutter portion of the paved
section.
4. The proposal to reduce the pavement width standard for local streets was
evaluated:
A. The e_cisting standard is 34 feet and was originally adopted without
serious analysis.
B. The conventional textbook standards do not appear to be based upon
an overall evaluation of the costs and benefits of generously large
widths, especially such impacts as increased runoff, higher con-
struction and maintenance costs, incentive for speeding, etc.
C. Adjacent jurisdictions have a 32 feet standard.
D. Access by emergency vehicles, especially fire trucks, should be a
critical consideration:
1) In the City of Portland, fire trucks routinely negotiate
residential streets of 28 feet width with cars parked on both
sides of the street.
2) The Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District prefers the fol-
lowing local street width standards:
No parking - 24'
Parking one side - 28'
Parking two sides - 32'
It has indicated, however, that it could live with a 30 feet
minimum.
Implementation Recommendations
1. Standard curbs should continue to be required.
2. The location of utility lines should be outside the paved section where
feasible as indicated by the Engineering Division of the Public Works
Department.
3. The local street pavement width standard should be 34 feet.
Runoff, Erosion, Sedimentation
POLICY #2 - The City shall initiate a cooperative, interjurisdictional water shed,
storm drainage and flood plain management study of the Fanno Creek basin, and
establish restrictive interim standards for development until sufficient data
is available to set standards at identified levels of adequacy. Interim
standards shall limit the rate of runoff and erosion caused by a development both
during and at completion of construction, as well as development in all flood
plain and wetland areas identified in the physical inventory.
Findings
1. The City has contracted with an engineering firm to conduct a drainage
study of the Tigard area.
2. The City adopted an Interim Stormwater Detention Ordinance (Chapter
18.58) early this year. This ordinance requires stormwater detention
facilities on new developments to reduce the runoff impact of urban-
ization. The Engineering Division of the Public Works Department has
found this new provision of the Code to work well.
3. General controls on runoff and erosion are lacking, especially with
regard to the construction process itself.
4. The Washington County Soil and Water Conservation District has developed
technical standards for control of erosion and sedimentation.
Implementation Recommendations
1. Title 14 (Buildings and Construction) of the City Code should be
g amended to require that construction plans and practices incorporate
measures to minimize runoff, erosion, and sedimentation.
i
a. The following general design principles will be applied insofar as
i
is practical:
' i. Wherever feasible, natural vegetation shall be retained and pro-
tected.
ii. When land is exposed during construction, the exposure shall be
kept to the shortest practical period of time.
iii. Sediment basins (debris basins, desilting basins, or silt traps)
shall be installed and maintained to remove sediment from run-
off waters from land undergoing development.
iv. The permanent landscaping and structures shall be installed as
soon as practical.
b. All construction plans and specifications shall meet the technical
standards and specifications in "Practice Standards and Specifications
for Erosion and Sediment Control" developed by the Washington County
Soil and Water Conservation District, which is on file at City Hall,
where appropriate.