Ordinance No. 81-23 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO. 81-a3
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO AN APPLICATION FOR A COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN REVISION TO "IM 1978 NPO #6 PLAN MAP OF THE CITY OF TIGARD DECLARING
AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Edwards Industries CPRPD 2-81)
PLANNING DEPAR'PMENT DEFERENCE INFORMATION
Tax Map 2S1 10A, Tax Lots 302, 400, Sol - Project Address 14240 SW Pacific
Highway and lots connecting to the southeast and east, - File Number CPRPD 2-81, -
Present zoning designation City of Tigard A-12 "Multifamily Pesidential Urban
Medium Density", - Zone changed to City of Tigard A-20PD "Multifamily Residential
Urban High Density Planned Development District", - Applicant Edwards Industries.
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION le Finding that the lands hereinafter described are now classified as
City of Tigard A-12, -and further findings that pursuant to
procedures, the abovestated application for a Comprehensive Plan Revision
was presented at a public hearing held by the Tigard Planning Commission on
March 3, 1481. All interested persons were afforded an opportunity to be
heard at this public hearing. Therefore, the Council adopts the following
substantive finding:
A. That the proposed zoning is compatible with the surrounding
neighborhood as determined by the Tigard Planning Commission.
SECTION 2: Therefore, pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 18.88 of the
Tigard Municipal Code, this request for a Comprehensive Plan
Revision of the NPO #6 Plan Map of the City of Tigard is hereby approved
subject to provisions of Chapter 18.24 of the Tigard Municipal Code as
embodied in adopted Exhibits "A", "B", and "C" attached and made a part of
this Ordinance. The zoning designation of the subject property is hereby
changed to A-20PD.
Exhibit "A": Legal Description - Exhibit "B": Tax Clop -
Exhibit "C": Staff Report
And further subject to the following conditions:
1. Development subject to Site Design Review.
2. Final plans to be reviewed by Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District.
3. Access to this site from Pacific Highway and SW McDonald Street shall
be reviewed at Site Design Review to the satisfaction of Public Works.
4. Revised parking layout to be submitted with Site Design Review material.
' f S. No Occupancy Permits shall be issued until all conditions placed upon
this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections
verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate department
ORDINANCE NO. 81 -
CPRPD 2-81
i
. i
6. No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unless formal
application is made to the appropriate City department and changes are
approved by that department. Application for changes will be made in
writing and shall include applicable drawings.
7. Grading and construction pians for all work in public rights-of-way
and all other public improvements shall be prepared by a registered
professional engineer in accordance with City standards, and shall be
submitted to the Public Works Department for review.
All public improvements will require a Compliance Agreement and must
be (design) approved by the Public Works Department, and must be either
(1) fully and satisfactorily constructed prior to the recording of any
minor land partition, public dedication, final plat, or issuance of
Building Permits; or (2) bonded to the City for 100% of the estimated
cost thereof prior to the recording of any minor land partition, public
dedication, final plat, or issuance of Building Permits.
8. All proposed utilities shall be placed underground. Street lighting
installations shall be approved by the Public Works Department.
9. All street and parking areas shall be concrete and asphalt. All sidewalks
shall be concrete.
10. No Building Permits shall be issued until the expiration of the twenty
(20) day appeal period from the date of approval.
11. The only residential use for this parcel shall be a home for the aged.
SECTION 3: Inasmuch as it is necessary to the peace, health, and safety j
of the public that the foregoing sone change I the City's records
become effective, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this ordinance �
shall be effective upon its passage by the Council and approval by the Mayor.
PASSED: By �� �,L",1 �� vote of all Council members present this ?7 '
day of . 1981, after being read two times E`
by number and title only.
RacdrcTer - City of Tigan
7
APPROVED: By the Mayor this �7� day of .Qv,�-. r . .1981.
r-:
Mayor City of Tigard 7f
' tp�
MINFNCS NO. el
b
EXHIBIT "A"
DESCRIPTION SHEET
See Page 1 for vesting and encumbrances, if any.
Description of the tract of land which is the subject of this report:
PARCEL I:
A portion of Lot 8, CANTERBURY PLACE, a duly recorded plat and
other lands in the Northeast one-quarter of Section 10, Township
2 South, Range 1, West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County,
Oregon, described as follows:
Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 10, said plat, being also
the Southwest corner of tract in Deed to R. T. Cooper as recorded
at page 17 of Book 556; thence South 890 591 West, 199.89 feet to
t a one-half inch iron pipe at the Northwest corner of said Lot 10;
thence South 890 541 2411 West, 190.39 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod
on the.North line of Lot 9, said plat, being also the Southwest
corner of tract in Deed to G. W. Hubble as recorded at page 575
of Book 405; thence South 890 541 2411 West, 79.10 feet to a 5/8 inch
' iron rod at the Northwest corner of Parcel I of tract in Deed to
Oregon Foundation, Inc. , as recorded at page 399 of Book 580; thence
South 3'40 551 1111 West on the nest. line of said Parcel I, 249.09 feet-
to a,5/8 inch iron rod at the Northeast corner of Parcel II of
said Oregon Foundation, Inc. Deed; thence North 590 ;021 1711 West on
the North line of said Parcel II, 98.18 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod
at the Southeast corner of tract in Deed to James L. Cain as
recorded at page 978 of Book 1119; thence North 330 571 5711 East,
{ 131.18 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod at the Northeast corner thereof;
thence North 560 021 0311 West, 123.75 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod
at the Northwest corner of said Cain, being on the East right of way
k� line of S.W. Pacific Highway; thence North 33° 571 5711 East on last
# said line, 190.96 feet to the North line of tract in Deed, G. R.
Bubble, as recorded at page 482 of Book 413; thence South 650
251 0811 East on said North line, 271.04 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod
at the Northeast corner of last said tract; thence North 250 491
1011 East, 140.89 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod; thence South 400
281 0611 East, 90.33 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod; thence South 730
461 1211 East, 259.71 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod on the West lane
of said Cooper Tract; thence South 000 391 West, 52.40 feet to the
beginning.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM the Easterly 42.0 feet.
PARCEL II:
The Easterly 42.0 feet of the following described property:
A portion of Lot 8, CANTERBURY PLACE, a duly recorded plat and
other lands in the Northeast. one-quarter of Section 10, Township
2 South, Range 1 blest, Willamette Meridian, Washington County,
Oregon, described as follows:
Report No. 34-A-107611
Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 100 said plat, being also
the Southwest corner of tract in Deed to R. T. Cooper as recorded
k at page 17 of Book 556; 'thence South 890 591 West, 199,89 feet to
a one-half inch iron pipe at the Northwest corner of said Lot 10;
thence South 890 541 2411 West, 190.39 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod
on the North line of Lot 9, said plat, being also the Southwest
corner of tract in Deed to G. W. Nubble as recorded at page 575
of Book 405; thence South 89® 541 2411 West, 79.10 feet to a 5/8 inch
iron rod at the Northwest corner of Parcel I of tract in Deed to
Oregon Foundation, Inc., as recorded at page 399 of Book 580; thence
South 33" 551 1111 West on the West line of said Parcel' I, 249.09 feet
to a 5/8 inch gran rcd at the Northeast corner of Parcel lI of
said Oregon Foundation, Inc. Deed; thence North 590 021 1711 West on
the North line of said Parcel II, 98.18 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod
at the Southeast corner of tract in Deed to James L. Cain as
recorded at page 978 of Book 1119; thence North 330 571 5711 Last,
131.18 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod at the Northeast corner thereof;
thence North 560 021 0311 west, 123.75 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod
at the Northwest corner of said Cain, being on the East right of way
line of S.W. Pacific Highway; thence North 330 571 57Q1 East on last
said line, 190.96 feet of the North line of tract in Deed, G. R.
Nubble, as recorded at page 482 of Book 413; thence South 650
251 0818 East on said North line, 271.04 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod
at the Northeast corner of last said tract; thence North 250 49' r"
10F° East, 140.89 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod; thence Soutai- 40"
281 0611 East, 90.33 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod; thence South 730
461 1211 East, 259.71 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod on the West line
of said Cooper Tract; thence South 000 391 West, 52040 feet to the
beginning.----------------------------------------------------------
E
a-
6x
k
T
Report No. 34-A-X107611 ,
t.
EXHIBIT "B"
• ! /e
ME.T rpQ��Q}a�a S.W. WIC DONALD S-
o d� .
m a'a' �ti/ �; g':as� s 2Qi. 2�0 a�as.
® ,.: flo �� e�*' 800 $ ` .a0� .ao�. axes try
200
�• ar�.er 8
a 500 �g &tet. s ena Ir
% � ®� 20 ��v, • R ass is
g �
X300 o°� 303
� O r trP as y-- s t.00es , •
Vo
•moo �" �ac� �(
50t io?
0 500
600
Nr
eve
� I
� o �
`t�'saoeArr0 ALLAY
X000 +32.30
!PAC �Av $<
A".rr
faaP.sa pyo)
O RS Y
j
S�«
EXHIBIT"C"
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA 5.5
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 3, 1981 - 7:30 p.m.
FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH - LECTURE ROOM
10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard
NO SUBMISSION OF ADDITIONAL MATERIAL BY APPLICANT SHALL BE MADE AT THE PUBLIC
HEARING UNLESS THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTED TO DO SO. SHOULD THIS OCCUR,
UNREQUESTED, THE ITEM WILL BE TABLED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING HEARING.
DOCKET: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, CPRPD 2-81
(Edwards Industries Medium to High Density Comprehensive
Plan Change) NPO #6
APPLICANT: EDWARDS INDUSTRIES OWNER: SAME
6800 SW 105th Avenue
Beaverton, Oregon 97005
REQUEST: For a Preliminary Plan Review for a Comprehensive Plan
Revision from City of Tigard A-12 "Multifamily Residential
Urban Medium Density" to A-20PD "Multifamily Residential
Urban High Density Planned Development District" to build a
home for the aged.
SITE LOCATION: 14240 SW Pacific Highway and lots connecting to the southeast
and east (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 10A, Tax Lots 302, 400, 501)
STAFF NARRATIVE:
At the present time, this parcel is zoned A-12 "Multifamily Residential."
on the Zone Map and Comprehensive Plan. It is the intent, in this case,
to change the Comprehensive Plan from A-12 to A-20 "Multifamily Residential".
Under the Code, all Multifamily must be reviewed as a Planned Development,
hence the A-20(PD) designation.' As the applicant states in the attached
Narrative, the purpose of the Change is to allow construction of an eighteen
(18) unit elderly housing complex. Present zoning is A-12 "Multifamily
- twelve (12) - units per acre". Proposed construction of eighteen (18)
units per acre would not be possible under present zoning. The lot is .93
acres. Under the PD designation, the Planning Commission could allow a
ten (10%) percent density increase for approximately fourteen (14) units if
open space could be found as a "tradeoff". This is not the case.
What the developer has proposed is a living complex for the elderly. The
proposed site plan meets the criteria for landscaping,and if you figure one
(1) space per two (2) units for parking; parking is adequate. The fire
department has reviewed and approved the plan.
The issue is whether or not to allow six (6) additional units or. this site.
Applicant is requesting three things: Comprehensive Pian Change, Preliminary
Planned Development Review, General Planned Development Review.
I
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA 5.5/CPRPD 2-81
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 3, 1981
Page 3
3. All public services are available to this site.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends a�oval of this Comprehensive Plan Revision from A-12
i1Multifamily Residential" to A-20PD "Multifamily Residential Planned Development
District" and the Preliminary and General Review with the following conditions:
1. Development subject to Site Design Review.
2. Final plans to be reviewed by Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District.
3. 3 int/acce s agr ement`�be p ovi fo ac ss f om 9W �i;Fa�rdTax o
t 00 ( 1 10 and/Vax Lf 30 (2� 10 to e rth Care
C ntCer)��(u_� ��J .. -mac.._) .fit. t` /�1 .;;_� �<.,t,_. r
V-/)I 1Jl.iU f-
4." Revised farki.ng lajc(4 to be submitted with Site Design Review material
5. No Occupancy Permits shall be issued until all conditions placed upon
this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections
verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate department.
:
S. No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unless formal
application is made to the appropriate City department and changes
are approved by that department. Application for changes will be made
in writing and shall include applicable drawings.
7. Grading and construction plans for all work in public rights-of-way
and all other public improvements shall be prepared by a registered
professional engineer in accordance with City standards, and shall be
submitted to the Public Works Department for review.
All public improvements will require a Compliance Agreement and must
be (design) approved by the Public Works Department, and must be either
(1) fully and satisfactorily constructed prior to the recording of any
minor land partition, public dedication, final plat, or issuance of
Building Permits; or (2) bonded to the City for 100% of the estimated
cost thereof prior to the recording of any minor land partition, public
dedication, final plat, or issuance of Building Permits.
S. All proposed utilities shall be placed underground. Street lighting
installations shall be approved by the Public Works Department.
9. All street and parking areas shall be concrete or asphalt. All sidewalks
shall be concrete.
10. No Building Permits shall be issued until the expiration of the twenty
(20) day appeal period from the date of approval.
anni .rector
APPLICANT'S NARRATIVE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE, ZONE CHANGE, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
2S1 10A Tax Cots 302, 400, 501
I. THE PROPOSAL
Edwards Industries of Beaverton is proposing to construct 18 units of elderly
housing adjacent to an existing convalescent care facility in Tigard. In
addition, on separate but contiguous properties, Edwards is proposing to
construct an office commercial condominium project. Offstreet parking for
each portion of the project will also be provided. The land use actions are
being requested in order to facilitate construction of the project in a manner
consistent with present city codes.
II. CONFORMANCE TO TIGARD'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
A. The residential facility;
Goals 1 and 2 in Tigard's Community Plan pertain to the proposed project.
Goal 1 says, "This range of residential densities (2 to 40 families per
acre) is intended to provide a variety of living environments that will
accommodate the housing needs of different family size and income". The
proposal seeks to take advantage of a unique opportunity available at
this particular site where an adjacent care facility exists. Because
of this situation, the construction of elderly residential units would
create the opportunity for family members (spouses) not requiring attentive
care to reside next door to the ailing spouse. Also, with state assisted
financing, the residential building owner would be able to offer rents
attractive to individuals (retirees) who exist on fixed or limited
incomes. These mechanisms, working together, should make a very success-
ful enterprise which would provide additional vitality and diversity to
the City of Tigard.
Goal 2 says, "The comprehensive plan recognizes the established character
of existing neighborhoods and seeks to preserve and enhance existing
neighborhood values. Future development proposals should be sensitive
to the concern of citizens for their own immediate environment as well
as to the well-being of the city as a whole. Since the proposed project
is new construction, it should enhance the property values of adjacent
owners. Additional open and landscaped areas will be provided to com-
plement and enhance those of the care facility. Circulation will be
improved to the adjacent apartments by upgrading access routes to meet
the code of the Fire Marshal. All improvements will take place in
accordance with city design code which will ensure that adequate standards
of appearance are met.
B. The office cop nercial condominium development:
While community plan goals of Neighborhood Plan 6 do not specifically
L
apply to this part of the development, the general thrust of the plan
can be interpreted through more specific policies of the Plan. These
policies are addressed for both portions of the proposal below.
C. Neighborhood Plan 6 policies relating to the proposed development:
Policies 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20 and 21 apply specifically
to the development. Each is quoted with discussion following.
f,
Policy 10. Urban medium-density residential areas will be developed
with paved streets, curbs and gutters, and walkways, according to
city or county standards. All utilities will be placed underground.
The proposal will include paved parking and access with curbs, drainage
structures and walks as required to meet codes. Utilities will be
placed underground on site where the developer has the ability to do so.
Policy 11. Development will coincide with the provision of public
streets, water and sewerage facilities. These facilities shall be
(a) capable of adequately serving all intervening properties as well
as the proposed development, and (b) designed to meet city or county
standards.
i
One of the public benefitsto be derived from this development will be
a more complet ' =. tilization of public utilities and services as a result
of the "filling in" of vacant city property. Sewers and water are
available without costly extensions and more efficient police and fire
protection will result as these voids are closed in. Additional taxes
will be generated without the need to expand the area to be served.
Poliy12. Planned unit development will be encouraged on tracts large
enough to accommodate ten or more dwellings. Planned unit development
will permit a degree of flexibi'sity in design that will enable a higher
quality of development in accordance with zoning standards.
The applicant finds the PD approach desirable from a flexibility stand-
point and intends to develop the property under these procedures.
Policy 13. Site plans will provide for adequate open space to (a)
protect adjacent properties, and (b) provide ample yard space for
residents and play space for youngsters.
While the project is not oriented for youngsters, outdoor spaces for the
use of the tenants will be provided. (See site plan. )
Policy_ 14. High design standards will be established for signing and
appearance, including the landscaping of setback areas and the designation
of access points.
i
In the interest of maintaining their reputation as a quality oriented
firm, Edwards Industries intends to provide attractive landscaping of all
areas not covered by buildings or paving. Sign:: and other details will
reflect this thinking and will be further analyzed and developed prior
to the Design Review application and procedures. Access will be shared
with an adjoining property which is used for dental offices. The present
driveway location will not be altered. Additional access points onto
Pacific Highway are not desired.
Policy 15. Apartments should be located to produce an Optimum living
environment for the occupants. Development criteria should include:
A. Buffering by means of landscaping, fencing and dis—r,::e from commer-
cial areas and major traffic carriers such as Pacifsc Highway.
B. On site recreation space as well as pedestrian and bicycle access
to parks, schools and convenience shopping.
C. The siting of buildings to minimize the visual effects of parking
areas and to increase the availability of privacy.
As previously mentioned, the details of the development are sketchy at
the present time, however, the developer is sensitive to the needs of
the users and amenities will be provided. Privacy is a key element in
the location of the residential structure. Units will have the rear
oriented toward what is envisioned as a common area supplement to the
existing care facility's common area, and the visual effects of parking
and access areas will be dealt with during the detailed design of the
site.
Policy 17. Avoid locating apartments where access can be gained only
from local residential streets.
s Access to the proposed residential units will occur via existing roadways
in the adjacent apartment development. Traffic will be slight. No local
single family streets will be utilized.
Policy 18. The Design Review Board will solicit the opinion of the
Neighborhood Planning Organization before approving development plans
for apartments in this neighborhood.
The proposed project will be subject to Design Review.
Policy 20. Pacific Highway is developing as a strip commercial highway.
The traffic-carrying capacity of this highway should have the highest
priority and adjacent commercial development should be subordinated to
this need.
As already outlined, the project will share its access with an adjoining
owner and will not add additional access points onto Pacific Highway.
Policy 21. In the interest of safety and efficiency, the number of
highway access points must be kept to a minimum. Wherever possible,
businesses on Pacific Highway should be clustered and share common
parking facilities and driveways. As new development occurs, the number
of access points should not exceed the number necessary for property
on-site traffic circulation and, where possible, should be combined
with access to adjacent businesses.
See the response to Policy 20.
III. COMMUNITY NEED/PUBLIC BENEFIT DERIVED.
A. See IIA.
B. A market study was undertaken to gain some insights into the need for the
development in October, 1980. The results of the survey showed that six
nearby multiple family developments of varying amenities were all full.
The low vacancies point to a definite need for additional units. A
healthy market condition is generally characterized by 3% to 4% vacancy
rates. Otherwise, a constrained market puts undue burden on renters,
as the demand exceeds the supply. The six projects surveyed were The
Maple Tree, Canterbury Heights, Panorama West, Canterbury Terrace,
Westwind Apartments, and Driftwood Terrace. These projects contain a
total of 344 units with a range of from 850 to 1,100 square feet.
The market study included a survey of 4 office condominium projects in
the northwest. Two are located in Beaverton, one in Bellevue, Washington
and one in Redmond, Washington. Beaverton Commons was just recently
completed and no sales have been recorded. Suburban West Office
Condominium is still under construction and there have been no recorded
pre-sales. In the Bellevue--Redmond area the Koll Company's "Limited
Edition" has sold 14 of 18 buildings ranging from 4,500 to 17,500 square
feet in just 9 months. The Rockwood Park project in Bellevue is 71%
constructed aad the project is sold out just 18 months after construction.
While the Bellevue comparisons are remotes the concept of office
condominiums is new, and existing projects are scarce. Based on the
recoru�; of the other projects, however, it appears that the idea will be
successful, and the demand should increase as inflation and the desirability
of ownership continue.
C. In general, the public benefit derived from the project will be the
conversion of underutilized vacant land to productive, upgraded, and
attractive uses.
IV. CHANGES IN EXISTING CONDITIONS THAT WOULD JUSTIFY THE ACTION
The change in existing conditions that most directly affects the property and
justifies the action is the fact that the conditions of the market and free
enterprise system are such that an investor has found a viable piece of
property to put to a better, more attractive and productive use. Prior to
this time, the conditions necessary to achieve that end did not exist.
i
V. SUITABILITY OF LOCATION
This location is perfectly suited for the construction of housing for the
elderly due to the location of the convalescent center immediately north of
the property. Additionally, since the site is presently zoned for multi-
family use, the proposed change to a higher density does not conflict with
the intent of the Plan, and further enchances the site as a viable location
for this type of development. Because of these conditions and the suitability
of the site, a detailed study of alternative sites was not undertaken.
VI. SURROUNDING IMPACTS
A. Traffic:
Some additional traffic will occur from both portions of the development.
The residential part will add very few trips, possibly only 40 per day to
existing streets. The office condominiums will generate approximately
430 ADT.L. Because of the configuration of Pacific Highway, right turn
movements will be the only kinds of movements to take place into or
out of the property. This is the safest possible arrangement without
going to signals.
B. Noise, Air Quality:
The increase in noise and air quality will take place at a level that
has been anticipated and planned for under the Comprehensive Planning
program of the city. The uses have been designated by the City after.
conscious consideration of the effects of those uses based on local,
regional and state standards.
C. Aesthetics:
The property will look better after development than it presently does.
This is a positive impact that should be considered when deciding on
the application. New improvements and landscaping will enhance the
appearance of the entire neighborhood as well as the property itself.
VII. PUBLIC SERVICES
As already described in IIC, Policy 11, the development will make more
efficient use of existirr, services at the same same it provides additional
taxes to support those services.
Note! PLEASE REFER TO ATTACHED DRAWING (SITE PLAN) FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION -
PARKING VARIANCE, SITE LAYOUT, RELATIONSHIP TO SURROUNDING USES AND CONCEPT
PLAN DISCLAIMER.
I. Source; Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2nd Ed. 1979
JAMES L. CAIN, D,M.D., P.C.
1490d, 5 W. PACIFIC HWY.
March 3, 1981
To: The Tigard Planning Commission
From: James L. Cain, owner of the property at 14300 S.W. Pacific Rwy.Tiax Lot 504
We wish to state that as owners of one of the adjoining properties that will
abut the proposed Edwards project at 14240 S.W. Pacific hwy., we are in favor'
of the development of this lAnd for this purpose by the Edwards CO. and in-
tend to cooperate with then in mutual harmony ass neighbors. We feel that
this use of the: property will improve the present site and enhance the appear-
ance and usssa.ge for all members of the community.
However, we wish the Planning Commission to be aware that there is stili one
serious consideration that w:.b! need to be satisfied between us and the Ed
wards Co. as tc the exacs. parking requirements all. buildingsbuilt and to be
built on the Edwards and Cain, prop rtitis- 'ne 1976 applications and accow-
panying narratives from the original XUP .5-76 from Edwards/Cain and the
original CO 20 76 from Cain, are on file at the City gall, and we have copies
of those. The recorded easement between the two landowners is recorded -with
Washington County (see index 78 16760).
We wish to make it clear that we accept the concept of the usage and support
Edwards Co. in the application for conditional use of the lend, We are meeting
to 'satisfy the original 1976 agreement between the two parties and both
parties have pledged to cooperate.
Firstly, we wish to go on records as fully supporting the Comprehensive
Plan ,Revision Planned Development application from Edwards Co.
Secondly, we wish to go on record as generally supporting the conditional €
usage application, with the qualification that the plan and usage will not
change the original Edwards-Caine eagreemnL granting usage of the existing
harking lot and now developed parking areas.
A;
x` d
.�:nIM.aKa»`.rat wa.+� ,,. .aw*,ms*,.:� r,:s+.�+�.-{�m,.;:.a-r.�,.7rr+.�e-'.:*�S''-�"-r,•-vr«r'r>.f4.. _.,,, y p .-e---.x.^, � i,._...
s
,
_
SITE DPTP� ���
Mew 1�0`7
--,rFLx- r;;b rk, OP-•1rKirnl:E',`4 ioC MA`i lFfN51T Eti;c�JF.i-�EM:r'i.:T�
o Fob APP RTNIET-1rS :V P`4 C- 44 vNt-6�q) ( .
NOTE° THIS FL--4,J 15
(y'l'GX TO MEET 7/OONC,GLpE P`F11ih!`G,NFNTS. FNbV a'
Gr,-GCAr l Mu. 2E 5eT -q'ir'"e.p DUWwq %siwJ 2F,hEW
LW 4r46 rlla^;7v ft-lNwlw-, Mer AarrA nrr v*ro HBAWNraE,
r c
GNorthml m r
I �
F 0 a0 80 , -
¢+ $ 0
WWI and Ham
:. 521 5W I th PxxmW(xacran W205
W #
W � W
Wg �
H o
.. - I'IItrIItlPI'11191PIIIgRI IIgIP Illplt UgRtl:"1R f(1(Rl 111.111 IIT R III Ijl III Ip II Rrlgl qr(I I I III III IlllTp Ili ygllnyl 1'I ql III qr III Iptyr qrn _ - -
rare: IF TRss xlcrovtuFo -----a--J--- 2 I 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 0 I I 12
OFAVIM Is IPss BEAR MAV
Hiss WTla.IT Is OSE TO -
llE QI ITY OF TI£ORIGMA -
'.'Of 82 BZ L2 a2 S2 62 FX R 12 02---6t -al--Ll--al- Sf--bl fl -ZI II01 a a L --9-- ^a b- E 2 Iw
wllnn6mivahwlll Id xlmdm�lla
MARCH-
� A �](�
r� MARCH �...:�y y 199
x