Ordinance No. 77-23 1 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON cC?
ORDINANCE NO. 77- 4
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 18.58.010 TO
ADD "C-3M, MAIN STREET COMMERCIAL" TO THOSE ZONES IN WHICH BUILDING
PERMITS AND CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: Finding that pursuant to Chapter 227 ORS and Ordinance No.
70-32 (City of Tigard Zoning Ordinance of 1970) the herein-
after stated amendment to said ordinance, pursuant to prescribed pro-
cedures, were submitted to public hearing held by the Tigard Planning
Commisson on March 1, 1977, and to the City Council thereafter recom-
mended that said zoning ordinance be amended as hereinafter set forth.
Section 2: The City Council further finds that after due and legal
notice, a public hearing was held by the City Council March
28, 1977, where all interested persons were afforded an opportunity to
be heard and present and rebut evidence with respect to said amendment.
Section 3: The City Council further finds that the purpose for this
amendment is to protect the public health, safety and general
welfare and, furthermore said amendment serves to implement the city 's
objectives and policies concerning development C-3M, Main Street Com-
mercial .
Section 4: That therefore Chapter 18.58.010 be amended to read as
follows:
"Except for single family dwellings building permits and certificates
of occupancy within all zones; building permits and certificates of
occupancy shall be issued in accordance with a site development plan
approved by the site development plan and design review board for the
lot or tract on which the proposed use, uses or major remodelings and
additions are to be located."
Section 5: Inasmuch as it is necessary for the peace, health and safety
of the people of the City of Tigard that the foregoing change
become a permanent part of the city's records, an emergency is hereby
declared to exist, and this ordinance shall be effective upon its passage
by the Council, and approval by the Mayor.
PASSED: By unanimous vote of all Council members present, after being
read three times by number and title only this _ day of
1977.
Recorder - Czty of T' rd
APPROVED: By the Mayor this day of � 1977.
Mayor City of Tigard
g
CITY QF TIGARDf OREGON
ORDINANCE NO, 77-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18,58 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE
ADDING C-3M TO THE ZONES IN WHICH SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REQUIRED.
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS;
The C--3M Zone,, described in Chapter 18.30 of the Tigard
Municipal Code, was created by Ordinance No, 75--28.
l other
commercial, multiple residential, and manufacturing zones gare lcovered
by the terms of -Chapter 18,58 dealing with site development plans, the
C^3M zone has not previously been added to the list of zones in which
site development plans are required.
It was and is the intention of
the City Council that site development plans be required for Ce-3M zone
uses. For that reason, Section 18058,010 is amended to read as follows:
"18.58. 010 Site develo mentfans-'re`cuired. (a) Except
for single family residentT 1 dwe lings eR- P R--10, R�15,
R--30) , no building permit shall be issue for a new building
or major remodelling of an existing building until the
plans, drawings, sketches and other documents required
by Section 18.58,030 have been reviewed and approved by
the Site Development Plan and Design Review Board in
conformity with the criteria set .forth in this chapter.
(b) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent
ordinary repair, maintenance and replacement of any part
of the building or landscaping which does not involve
substantial change from the goals and objectives of this
chapter. Proposed "substantial changes" shall be submitted
to the Site Development Plan and Review Board for approval
and shall be subject to -the procedures and requirements of
the site development pland and design review process
applicable to new proposals."
PASSED; By vote of Council members present, this
day of 1977,
Recorder - City of Tigard
APPROVED: By the Mayor this* * day of
1972.
Mayor City of Tigard
Page one - Ordinance No. 77
S'_ F REPORT
AGENDA 7
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
?March 1, 1977 - 7:00 P.M.
Twality ,Junior High School - Lecture Room
14650 S.W. 97th Avenue - Tigard, Oregon
DOCKET: ZOA 1-77
KF!,LEST: To add the "C-3M, !Main Street Commercial" zone to the list
of those zones within which new construction and major re-
modeling is subject to Design Review Board approval .
APPLICANT: City of Tigard
I . BASIC FACTS:
1 . Section 18.58.010 of the Tigard Municipal Code states:
"In the A-2, C-3, C-4, C-5, C-P, M-2, M--3 and M-4 zones, and
for conditional uses within all zones; building permits and
certificates of occupancy shall be issued in accordance with
a site development plan approved by the site development plan
and design review board for the lot or tract on which the
proposed use, uses or major remodelings and additions are to
be located.
II . FINDINGS :
1 . Since Section 18,58.010 of the Tigard Municipal Code was adopted
Chapter 18. 30 (1,9ain Street Corunercial) was added to the Tigard
Municipal Code and through oversight the C-3M was not specifically
addressed-in the Site Development Plan review section. -Without
realizing this technical deficiency the Design Review Board has
been reviewing projects in the- C-3M zone. The continued review
of projects in the core area is imperative to fulfill the com-
munity design goals of the Tigard Community P?an , Neighborhood
Plan I and the Tigard Municipal Code.
2. Chapter 18.59 .010 (Architectural Design Review) addresses the
situation in the following manner, "except for single family
residential dwellings, no building permit shall be issued. . . "
This wording maintains the flexibility for when zoning districts
are added or deleted.
III . CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS-. -
It was clearly the intent of the site develop;-,i-Int plan section of
the Tigard Municipal Code to include new construction and major
remodelinr;s in all zoning districts except single family zones 1.0
be appy-3ved by the Design Review Board, and through oversight in
a 1975 amendment to the Tigard Municipal Code creating the C-3M
zone, it failed to include the new zone among thosein which con-
struction is reviewal ,
r
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA 7
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
March 1, 1977
Page 2
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Amending Section 18 .58.010 to read "except for single family
dwellings building permits and certificates of occupancy within
all zones; building permits and certificates of occupancy
shall
be issued in accordance with a site development plan approved
by the site development plan and design review board for the lot
or tract on which the propos"
ed use, uses or major remodelings and
additions are to be located.
a
3
9
'ss"it;'1kS
` TIGAIRD PLANNING CO',IMISSION
Page 9
Commission approval. and -4 be changed to read one access.
The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote.
7. ZOA 1-77
A request to add the "C-3M, h"ain Street Commercial" zone to the
list of those zones within N-hich new construction and major
remodeling is subject to Design Rlv:it?:t Board approval .
A. Staff Report : Read by Daniels
B. Staff Recommendation:
Amending Section 18.58.010 to read "except for single
family dwellings building permits and certificates of
occupancy within all zones; building permits and certi-
ficates of occupancy shall be issued in accordance with
a site development plan approved by the site development
plan and design review board for the lot or tract on which
the proposed use, uses or major remodelings and additions
are to be located."
C. Public Testimony: None
D. Commission Discussion:
Iood moved and Tepedino seconded to approve the proposal
based on staff findings with staff recommendations.
The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote.
-rFm
8. ZOA 2-77
A request to amend Section 17.28. 110 of the Tigard Municipal
Code to reduce in length the maximum cul-de-sac street length
from 600' to 400'
A. Staff, Report: Read by Daniels
Staff also submitted'testimony from the Fire ?,.arshal
encouraging the proposed change .
B. Staff Recorunendation :
Replace the words four hundred" for "six hundred in
Section. 1E.28. 110 of the Tigard iMunicipal Code.
C. Public Testimony: None
.r D. Commission Discussion :
Wood moved and Sakata seconded for approval based on
staff finding., _
}` The motion failed in a 3 to 3 roll call vote with Moore,
rj
_S3C &§3U<
% . 9C; Cit-, ?omjcil
2 F'OM: Planning Tierart2ent
§ S U B,JTC2: Zee ±n3 0& Arcp±Io2 of TTOUC±nr Policies Ordinance
DATE: M'arch 28, 1977
< The accompanying Bousin- policies and effectuating ordinance
. . . incorporate instr ct±ons ±o the staff by the Coi-m it at the
\ 2 y study session of 114054 , March 21, 7977, .
U
MEM.ORA.;D"U"N.
V Council
r:1 Plana irg :--Par Len L4
c:tar- m. 4l , +� Se p o '4c.-Eno, l
..� s-�C C��y Co.�7c'1 S �. •ci„ ,,ssi n _ ::oa___. . c ivies
__arch
17, lir?
A-. ;`-4I' rE filar c- February 17, 1977, the :tel=i_,^-ing la'Jmm4ssi0r,
rev Ewed a } n a-^ enl ic—s for r -e h S- 1;7- .o1lcias
Z'?GOLuer;�c .a _ssicr arc- t=- c ._.e _.:c_. 3e dram
repot+ on, housing. 1ie r r 4 -foc"..2s.''_r n_V on I n-
1C�1Ld}2r, dasT `-n'od to 7eciC1 y,:-,; T:; ,icns sn houssirg poli '_�5
tc be adc- ted by the City. Th-? re-p.--rt- Is a:I'd c-n several months c
ae c c C'aff i a t:, n G':S -�:L _ i lyh rel,—,; -± �Gv ;mei
in r. i<< ti __^ yes,.i`C. _ c o:
Ta.:cl j ?.,;LL 1 r r - E.r1t.g, C?'J':'d '.c'i } l=ri i t-ion 0I i ve'�S
a� es -public c.. 3 ou s_L c ca
i.. the u.rafl. report prio `-o __:e .AcrSCzay c ._iy`. sess_nf 'v.e w`ll
a aijable vC e-.swc r any que-Stix zs.
qD
rl
�L-J ;, rr.
v ��� LIJ-d
Q�Q
1
PAGE
Text 1
7 Problems and Pol -c: o 11
,pendi.ci es 14
Al. jousing Go. _ . _ 14
. . . - ,: .. ..
Cor.sc_rrt, T _,..
A2. :sousing Pl.an
from t_ne L.
Urban
A3• Housing ObjectivLoObject _
17
B Current
Goal 19
Cost of a co :,
• Tigard 21
r, recent Vacancy 23
Commun i ,._ . . . . . . . . .
E Increased ,,r . . . . . 26
Declining :WMhcQs 7YO , . . .
Area
'r La'1dS by �On arC i t e n 'i. L j f cat?on 2
within ti-le r •i _. 5. e „ . . . . . . . 9
ion. .
I
Curre n t S 32
JecteO
33
K. Costs of . • • is
L
Single
. . .
Alteration o
38
r,
+-a
�. _. � er fy ...�_ E:. ,, v. �• �- � - fir,
crit'
_, cm: 'InivAnE r i f y . . . .C lot Z!ze am, 41
l r r . . . . . .
B , lna��_e _.. . .. :, rf _ * , °e ':']Fr 'ea • . . • 44
45
T., is:i}.l i —r;;p12y . . ,
i-
i S Z
i { yY J A. if
_.
SN INC _ +
y i _
77
i
.- - / 7 E j�: -��,.,,• r--Y�- fes.:
4
•-}• � h•, -s I .. •;. � �'�.�\ �I' .off
y I d ?s
it
AF
i
N.
,
v�
^
j
C
:A
}
dill
MAgW
r;
a
- E
a:
ell vk
Owl
t
J
,r _. resldyr�
c-
AM
via , vivo lot -.... ,» ., ... ,
ma.,. wa �, E
E
f
1r
'")^rte }` fc•r ?.n i 1 a'.'!.iY1jT
- _••''�- tori r C-„..',: r:'-.J'•'.). �* _!Z .^tom- 1 '.1•�t�
of
.t.ist �1.. . �a in elf >. li 4e
The Ct A'v housing . ''ia_
`, ^> -a o n
y=.rely foo-_,a1 ^ s c,,-a� S 3.i, GL`; C /r_ u - [
' n M, i ;r.i 1 ,a !'7.c�.:7 �n INPC
extent in the _;gars? C y r_
i�i2^aBFi 8 '_tori) :ln5. n ..:a ^' .” > ~-'�*
ait n._
firs E r�� L-ai;
Goal (p. 1() 1 e= r5 o a a
3 11
o e a v i ty of li-v Will
c. .
tended `o ;ter vial ar e 1
h0Z,.iSi:%g -cac`�S QI C_.:_c_:'F:'c, =�? _y
Q G f _.i.'�J. : w.: I ly ;Sr.'..41-hi_. '_he va St de ade, t s f'-.�rier-f al t.
Sino the late _.40 s, J "he _
go v er% F=nt has p-!aCaC:+ inc- r G _ut,
to Haat l., _l _ _G a bus
ani y Tn?l 3S y' c� ��_ 1?7 l g7C f `-- ec<d h-
=.ion-S as - ts Cr
'-' r, -
Sui vEy
tc real ordlor ei. a,= �._ _ -•�' . ✓3r:u..2 • _ .. a Ji a, l.i
J w,n_ i era tt'ra' t,_-at C>1 ock 3; __1 v
d C
!^a-- ✓'• h
^T� :f ^•ice i _ e'_-:':_
u . (J v _
4 � i S •- I?
•r -semYt ^r .� _..:.c•4 -.t the s ?.s
uy��1.� F Y r 2
v Q wll T J•1'v fi '. ci v- G 7c^ t- h-r.I_a, S�'-,df _S, a me
�Jy J
al - r sd ,n s 1 share _
r f J
5_�II y r- r'Q }S _ err ?j r allu aT Su C = r311 C
_5 r1, Vit%:v+ �,
F, f - l
�� .:':- X .'a?� F1�G :.s L :�.%,ver �i ,i i.•==C_' C G-4.". ._.::.��. i7i...�.��_�5� F
an co ii
'G
t
Staff Research on Tigard Housing
In order to accomplish the task of bringing the Tigard Comprehensive Plan
and implementing ordinances into conformity with the state housing goal, the
planning staff has been involved in several projects. Among the more im-
portant of these have been the production of land use maps of the plan area,
technical studies and maps of physical limitations (natural hazards), an
apartment survey, a housing need survey (Appendix N) , a preliminary survey of
substandard and deteriorated housing, single family house value survey and
map, buildable lands survey, investigation into specific housing problems and
possible solutions identified in our research, and organization of a Washington
County inter-governmental - interest group housing workshop. This draft report
contains the most important information which is available to date on Tigard's
housing problems and solutions. It will be supplemented and revised when all
housing work program elements are completed in a few weeks, and when housing
policies have been adopted. The final housing report will be prepared at that
time.
The Cost of a Conventional New Single-Family Home in Tigard
Boldly stated, the Tigard area does not presently have adequate numbers of
dwellings in the types and densities demanded and in all price ranges.
This is by no means merely a problem for low income families: housing is a
serious problem for middle-income wage-earners who might want to settle in
Tigard. Although there are some older homes in the Tigard area which cost less
than $35,000, they are relatively few in number and when they appear on the
market they are rather quickly sold if they are of sound construction. The
lowest cost new conventional home available in Tigard today costs about
$35,000. On the basis of moderate to conservative assumptions about standard
mortgage lending practices and excluding costs for insurance, maintenance, and
utilities, it can be calculated that the minimum gross income necessary to pur-
chase this rock bottom 'rouse is $14,640 (Appendix C). The average price of a
new conventional home in Tigard is $45,000, and the income required to purchase
it is $18,816. Estimated median household income for city residents was
$16,147 in 1976. Average-income families now living in Tigard could not afford
an average-cost new home.
3
,K
:Multiple-Family :fomes in Tibard: Ccst and Availabi li ty
Multiple-family housing in migard offers scant haven for families
priced out of the conventional home-ownership market. The overall
average rent for apartments in Tigard is X179, but the vacancy rate
is relatively low (Appendix D) , especially for the lot, cost
units. Moreover, the average cost of new apartment units is $235,
which requires a gross income of at least 0`11,280 if the house-
hold is to avoid paying an excessive proportion of its income on
shelter. Fewer and fewer households can afford t.:e rising cost
of new apartments: in 1975 about 551% of the households in the
Portland area could not afford the average rent of new
apartments.
Some Causes of Tigard's ucusir_g Problems
There are -any causes of the basic housing problem in T.oard.
The co=anity's locaticr. at the edge cf 7. ,Drtland has meant rapid
grot,rth in the past tverty years. maze do-ble-digit Inflation of
recent years, coupled with an economic downturn, ::az e made
mortgage loans prehibi Lively expensive while simultaneousl�F reducinG
the earning pm,,er of families. Another factor is increased
expectations (Appendix E). A generation ago houses were much
less costly because they were much, smaller, and that was during
an era of large families. Now smaller families expect larger
douses. Those smaller families are part of another cause of the
:cusir.0 problem: declining average househole. size (t. pendia F) .
Iz 4'he number of individuals living together has decreased,
_ _
IJ
T'-la r'`1'?ir
-c~e o LG^es P r �5 ^� A runits
r =r .. e 1s =n
c _4e I.i.'T..'J l';O 12 i1-1 tS - -_ c�;_ :. �t.-��•
L Of _ _ t
c�
„ i• o
._.,7,G �,: v 4 '.. � ,-'�-'`� ♦ 16`ice _.
's-.-- --•�.L _ � - -=� . _,.,:�_ i' •-•C.
�r r-_�?�
`r
sol
r
C!G, ..^.CST �? ___:� .__ '�S 01^ '_TI '•d: l _1 ,_. j' .o c7 i� 'O :�? 7c
6 y r,.+ d a i n. -act,
•today 1`�S t CF' L and a_ ? �Y _ s
Tn
V_.
V
1�y^_i fCk 'rrs , _ 'FaGo C,
_�� 1 _ 1 -
dl. :%. U`. - ::CJ _"_ ".'__. __..—....L.� .�'�",.i .i.. Lr I1� .e J'1� „7 �•••�
._ 4:�L tr. t.�--, ...i._... .�� __.,uc =i t�E>�'C•..l h r'--D :Clte dl- ect._. ?�: iIi
r a•s` c: i y _ C-i ' C acs .._"`cnc : !
. . � -
��- w i•-
C.
is
c r
ncy
'E' �- -. 1 ee. cS' _`�r v.�.P C: .:..-P'y: f.:_ - ...Y:.±. '-..�.r:
., '^.
c f L i - r• rte..' r; c _. uS 'J$Le
,-1-1 -- u� L1 a' _U_
.z r�•1 7
^- a� -^." i� 'is* l c Oc ii.� o s LnIg ci oc:: _.. Mul:_y y }i;:_YS
act 2' -
l.
�.� �1lal �-n•T 1 J �,�rr.:1i .. .. L- �} �✓- .� �- -r- • T'�� l.� _-_..� 1 _.1. �T_ _.y (,�.�:: 4` ,. , _
and lo-n5
-.�
cl'.C :� -^=f✓-.�..0 fir^. - 'ry o...
_.ems _ `- -'n
ZV
...els
J
ff
f`
}i}.., C sc-
r u TSI '•
_
. r1
c
— — -
.l.
a
i
I �
In an a:tempt to i den tify the n,-imb pf F P i lie S or individuals who a"
si_� - or who v,ould pl,,. rcilase housing if it Were av
in need Cf hot: aila'0le �o
hone _ur-1ei
Of elcy ers� in the plan ar=a
meet their income levels, a +elepdiX l .O/c ( np-De
Was conducted by 'the Citv in the fall Gf
I
,- s .J� etc. ) provided the City '•v" tr- a
and other date sources �,�,'.��� 7 pati 5��.1.0 > -�� �
~ y t mar'_ket situation is in regard to �
clearer under=tat'=d i r'g of Vna t the -ores n €
housing and Correspondingly the difficulty :r any families are experiencing
f + e hOLSi?_. .
t '^ket beca".se O 'r cur-rent of
by being excli�C ed frC?m "t-1 r.
The regional planning age_.c5 s
rrr * i in the process of reviewing the overall
"for."tne re T i or and will be providing tecl-.nical assistance
housing picture a-
to local jurisdic lio-s. This assistance will provide coEmuni ties wl th an
,.• ,,,a , goal should be.
idea as t0 °,.'nat their fair share of ane regional housing 5
a vehicle for establishing an eq Ui t-
pegioral di rection will alsoprovide
a f units which allow for Tlexibilittir Of ho-using-
zing
Sire
able pr Cportion o- housl.ng
and rent le`:elS de ',ait^
+- e and ders4 tv an P"ice ranzes 4
location, .„p
tb fi?'•,:•-cial ca:'s-i l it;es Cr mi v ri li^''S�(lOids•
rly poo
The eiAerly ha-;e - -
-.l syn i «c.,-• e C �' rn^c« pre s s J no,
di -fic-,11-v in
rf 1yc l i . Wachingtr=
nb'fP*uos "any nlr�_ prho-:]le
T}? _ r r - r _,a r t' ese i,
L .a.vti riz,o ei erl;, live ZP-Se '?=d
f`r;t-,r '" }., J v i� �' vt.Gt '"t
}i Tr ^.=�
that
71 r�i �C _ e F �u
s vcr ry 'C v� -o_ ..re _re
CCiC� r'+ ^ems _ _^ t
r�C`rr. cw_ne E__o T1 t`^ Yu^G =r.0 Cc _�a � - —r+� [•.?f'.-isT ._�.'''.`^..,.
-- ry +^' -ete,
are r
SO i o -
�y , F- tea. a r at a^j
5Cm eS t0 h = f
Plan
(1r i ?a _+ii'ied s -'gl .._� circ r=eds c
C., :o zs r L__ 7
3>tac 1 I� _ Y. t v` 1 3 r c}'r _ ri ?l+„G ,ative
akts elderly, 'C
L.
"V' y
a r c_n
je_^) '^52eu- parta-u.:l..�'_"l.`r
,, _
C j?` Y`n .�v" c-,;+r tc- and ' c ui.siIc. i;-l�'. t0
- ed-ed ho' sing m2- •j .�e � - -
�+' ra terior-
.. .a. «�r7 4' -bu�,. v1 .,.�' '"�b: r:"icod e
I;ay wsl s, and 'wh.ere C_nwert Can Cont: y ,
}� l ;. _ __. y ' Tl ._• l: 1: _c::.
._..3..t e t t _ }' _ _ --Dn. 7 _ „ _ � ._`'} ._._ t i�'�_,� �. _. 'n, ty f a c .ter. 'r
fir'=.'lr.,-^c 2 .4-%- ._✓ ....:.:.G._` j ��._._ _. -- '..v .�-r sdic�acns .'.,... _.'.
} _
mccr,7
Wi 'I _ Y .r_ r.- .._.... v...� __� J n. vim.;:__
Cl
oi _ _.. c _: _. ..._ t,.,. S.L.-...., - -.. __ - _ _. t-C - _•. �-
F
�+4
• j
i
LCi')O NOUS%NG aOA-L
rrZO pY071id3 7-or tine housS ?,g reeds Gf -i �erS
Z' Of the sate.
BuiZdable Zands for residential use shaZZ be inventoi,ied and pZans s,?aZZ er-
^'R'age the qva� lap2lZty of QMe(ivaie is G'�7erS Of Nous;rg ur?its at ✓r C2 rarigeS and
rcY:t ZeveZs whivh are com,•,ensurate with the financial capabiZZties of 0r gcn house-
holds and aZZozv for fZexibility of Nous g location, types rr rr
a.,d density.
PROPOSED MOUSING POLICIES FOR TIGARD
PROBLEM AREA =1
Many individuals who work in the area are unable to find suitable
housing because of cost and a relatively narrow range of oppor; unities.
On the other hand some existing housing is in unsuitable locations
(eg• flood plains) . The community lacks a coordinated housing program
which addresses these and other housing problems of the area.
Policy Z. housing deveZopirient shaZZ occur to the
� greatest extent possible, on
designated bziZduble Zands (those Zac;ing flood ha��rd, sevare soil.
Zi?ritations, etc.
Policy 2. Y?e cor„riunity shaZZ promote and encourage a d.versity of housira densities
and residentiaZ types that are available at vz'ious pr'iees and rents to
hcuseiaoZds of aZZ "-"Orrres, age, sex, nice and Ziving puser�?s. Such
housing should incZude, but not be Zirrited to single fa,,vi's residences,
duplexes a n_rt,e
.+ � nZS, 7fiOb2Z2 YlX,/1eS, CUYti201;7Z%?2uI;tS and T.OZJYZ�houses.
PoZicy 3. Housing units shaZZ be designed cons ruc constructed ana main u"ew so trcav
the cOrm?ur.ity is asst 'ed of safe, sanitar Qr n
y, d ve, r.t L� ng con-
in
in CZ, that are Sound, energy e1fZCZ8nt, and aL„r•active
Zn their, appearance.
PoZicy 4. Prohibit housing
u..scr;.rrir_.�„t,on based or race, sex, Breed,
and maritaZ status.
PROBLEM AREA 7#2
Tigard residents fear their established neighborhoods are being threat-
ened by rapid change due to F;rowth . The location of higher density E'
and low income housing are subjects of particular concern. In addition
new residential developments can create public facility shortages
(eg. schools) and increased taxes
PoZicy 5. As stated b the adc::ted NPO A.
y � ( 'el'anborhnod PZanrirg 0,yarcizat•icnl pZars
the residentiaZ cha:racter Or e r ,
� st..;cl,:,,ne.� nezc�n::�Orhonds shall be
protected and means sought to ensure their preservation.
I'
`t
GvZs - 6 lva2LULZZZL ! O +_'+7,{:'Zic Sel'vioes impool:ea
PoZicy P. L�- e methods for ensu=�•��g the `� f ,°�
by a cxeveZoJrrrc�-nt (Ztrder 'CDC G;iaZ #ZZ). ,F
PoZicy 7. Multi-rw(liZ' hous2n ehall _2 Zoca Zed GD ZYIg L,^• O "" _u
vas
ac. �.Y'C, a(J✓-' p_':,a�e Sia 'LS
as indicated 2n 2Gr' or7-,00d i)r,?Un2�ation
PoUc B. Low and rri.adarate income houcin un =s shaZ.Z he Zor%, .
� g ' �d :.u..o_ :z..ng to
appropriate standurds (eg., not G"O'rZC nt2'at20T2S Of zo?_ue Size, to rain-
ZrrlZze impacts on ewistiny^ nicig�+L 02"'hODLLS, etc.).
PROBLEM AREA :;�3
The rapid increase in housing costs Excludes many families from ob-
t"af,ing suitable housing to meet their needs. Among the more important
causes is the rising cost of land. Building costs have contributed
to this situation. Excessive government standards (eg. , zoning, sub-
civision codes) are a significant cause of single family housing costs
k' effectively exclude alternatives to conventional housing. Even
with a significant change in housing cost trends, there will still
remain an unmet need for low income housing.
PoZicy 9. Encourage rousing deveZ.onment' in areas w2�re rvwbZ'ic �'aci?ities aZread7
exist (eg., sewer, water, streets).
PoZicy ZO. Revise the zoning ordinance to pf. snit rnobiZe home sufbdi.vi.siorls and
marks in suitabile axeas and under standards w7h'ic1'i make thein
c'orrfpatiNe with the ne2ghJorhood.
Policy ZZ. Rev ew irid revise the subdivision and zoning coCir"'s to the '
I-'?°E3 en Ce OT any Ur,'aUZy res i� .,ct ve r.,ovisions whZ�h c,-,uZG J2 jY�r GC In LU
increase coets whiZe prow -^Zng negligible ilenefits.
d€.
POZZ 'yZ2. ReViSe ZOt S*Ze regit 2'er,?ents to ProvZae diversity (eG., allow smaZ.Zer P
'Got sizes 2n de i'g-iat-ed al,eas) without changing the Character of e=stina
nceiahb0l;ZOods.
PoZicy Z3. AcceZerate the review process for approvaZ of deveZo.-wnent rroposals
where the quaZity of -"he review is not adverseZr GJ ected.
PoZicy Z4. Acconlodate for the provision of s7;.Msidiaed housing ass stance to rrteet
Tigard's fair share of ZocaZ/ragivnaZ 'mousing needs.
` PROBLEM AREA #4
Single-family dwellings satisfy only a portion of the housing needs
in the Tigard area. Existing vacanc-
g
y rates and project=ion trends in-
dicate a need to provide for additional multiple-family housing. More
generally, there is a need for a greater diversity of housing densities.
Policy Z5. Provide greater di.ve2'eit2l of housi=ng density (eg., du zex, �-V'Zex, E,
attached sirgZe-fcji7iZv, units, etc.).
12
NF-
__.
4.'
PcZicy Z6. Provide for a diversity of housing tapes in Zarge residentiaZ pZanned
unit devel.oprients which offer the opportunity to plan for their
corapat-inZe pZaoement.
3
PROBLE:;i AREA r5
The elderly often have unique housing problems. rla.ny elderly on
modest fixed incomes have difficulty finding housing which meets
their special facility and locational needs. Elderly homeowners
sometimes have financial difficulty maintaining their home.
PoZicy Z7. Encourage eZder'.'y group-living arrangements (eg., apartments with
shared jacilities) in appropriate Zocations.
PoZicy Z8. Allow eZderZy horieozaners to take hoarders.
PROBLEM AREA r6
Some housing in the coma;unity is deteriorated or substandard, creating
r�
unsafe conditions and a blight on the neighborhood.
PoZicy Z°. Conservation of housing resources shaZZ be encouraged through code
enforcements renovation, and rehab;Zitation of the existing housing
stock.
t
9
- 1
A 'r'x'NDTX Al
LC DIC GOALS
GL
ro provide for the )-,o,-,si.nq neads of citizens of the state.
Buildable lands forY -�i(3?nt.ial use shall be inventoried
.. 7S S ;n1I P:?r O? r 33 icenl
)-jijity Of adc-,quai_e nwn'.,ers
O housing units at pr ce ° 5 and- rent levels wl-ilch are
CC):;.ii1+=i7surate with tale n=i C'..al capabilities Of oreaon_ house-
1"lC!IC75 and allow for 'eY, :_ Ij itv of housing location, tv.+e and
density.
^* ;T �7E LT-'NDS--refers „r,- -n Urban and ur';aniza'_ie
BU LD-74 _E''ErS to �a:_ b
areas that are su- a',le, available and necess:!ry far
residential use.
;3; 'tiT:;;JCJ��- -reFerS to one o-r more persons occupying a Single_
housing unit.
GU-iDEI:" ES
1. l.ri addition to of buildable lands , housing
=S O� - cn;`_ ns _'ire plan Slr Ll'.�+ at c T[].ri1ITlUII+
p
rr i* :.. :' .ion Of the
r. :t 02 r r f c r3ul]tion of
r: n `
amu_ - it cost :2i G d�4.rm ation of
larle _,nc i
ar,C3 at i-'r 'i:lr` rent ranges
�' a M--"nation 'of �pected holls�ng
n y rY 1 :]
,,n ' c Te ens (a) allo:�`-
z w G- C7 15 i'_ S an'f r c of rE 1tlences 1Y,
each rt, r; -a 1d {5} c 7', �'E'',tory of sr--fund housing in
n= r r i� a, Ie- of .nein rehabilitated.
ui+•:l?;v GYC..S-_.l C:�.L. ... 1_
units l.'. =J.
_ L G' insures the
S
c)4- land k1t ,zr:
Jr
T a
_ism. u_.. r: dihE necessary
t. c_ng needs O`
E:
-I l i nc,. legs
IocatIon
7D Y t . _ til . =nt G.-:. -+'. �...t.
ror
r Icon�..
iia ior i! ie C s ig J1 a'-r+
t' nn�? := r-_ "C'.JU-r_.,.?S G_ t C L.� r I•.; :1�:. c _ LIa _:LiE- laClCl CCJI
: .,d �� s est _Gr.s _ -' "Gr F' ,uc}'
ls:1J'11G j^vt e C� `i c' car r _�1 a t\" of cit h
re so jr ces.
Y
st
i4 E
B. IMPLE'>ENTATION:
1Plans should �,p._-DTl r3e a continuing re,,ev: of housing
meed projections and should establish a process for.
accommodating .__,1ded rev cions.
. Plans should tai:e into account the effects of utilizing r
financial incentives and resources to (a) stimulate the
rehabilitation or _.=i' Cr.rd :?(w=ing without regard to C
the .financial can--_c _-Ly of L'�e owner so long as benefits
accrue to the occupants; and (b) bring into compliance
with codes adopted to assure safe_ and sanitary housing
the dwellings of i 1Cti Vi i :als i.ho cannot on their own
afford to meet quc'2"l copes.
3. Decisions on housing uevelooment prcpcsals should be
ei..JC31* i..ed ,dhen such prc;%.?Sats are 1n accordance with Zo:; ?;C?
ordinances and Uri i7 n-rovisi^•nc of coli^rehens2Ve nfans .
'4 . Ordinances and incen.�ives should ,_ .. used to incr_.ase
population dens i = cS i is 0 5=;an dl:ecs =a=:in.g into cons-.a-r-
ation (1) kkE',' . a.c: .'_I .: s , 2 ) the 'c',)I,tomic, enL i-ronin-ntal ,
social and en-,-a,- c es of the proposed -2nsit es
nd (31 the e;`:i.sting urrIan land pert"
lar.1v in sec-lo-_ c .,,. , ii i.ng significant amounts of
unsound sulbs:a;.,I`ia .
'do ' t i_-)n l _e .or ng this goal.
should, a.`-te C .; _ t_71i of
`Zit
e i .•act on lower income_
�
ti1Ci se'�oidS, In i ]C: ,'.'it ? o b ? - _i?u O: (1) tax in-
c ep*ities and d, es; 21 '->~_lc n, and construction
Code revision, 1,31 2,c -._.,?C ane land us= controls, (4) suh—
si e F and lr,i nc (G) "-e and s ._s :i ._. iee acCTuisition
en_ :_,nt of lc _a' health and safety
,.oats; and (7) coca _.tion of ,e �'.,,•e cor.�erit of .urban.
fa i11ties and ces to d-' snerse Ion+ income housing '
throughout L planning area.
E F -s .- -iou d :,. c, _ - a , ie : =~,e-.t program to
:.a.. . =;� G`. i\'e l: _ ' �a� ,... _. . ,d7 : L"E.'_}oi:S
Ii i.•-. ^t
bilil• S to t`i_:se C;J .. i..�...:!,. �C):._�c. _y'C+_i-z! }n� the
planning arca and ir. -a_-rv-*na out the
Goal.
i
15
A
HCIJSI AND CO 'IUTNITY ACT OF 1974
ECD Rules and Regulations
For an application to be acceptable for uonsideration by HUD
all community and development block giant applications shall contain
a Housing Assistance Plan which ;
(1) Accurately surveys the condit.;on of thehousing stock in
the community.
(2) Estimates the housing assistance needs of lower income persons.
(3) Specifies a realistic annual goal
units or persons to be for the number of d«elling
assisted .
(4) Indicates the general location where housing assistance shall.
take place.
Incomplete or inadequate preparation of =-IAA's mans' constii.•,:te
grounds for disapproval of an entiro community Development Block
grant application.
Beginning with the first fiscal year. and each -fiscal an annual performance report shall he su?emitted to HI!Dywhich ear ��indicates
the progrbss made toward providing housing a.ssistanc.e.
i
1
4
} all r! tiveL!IOc
Dover,,. . _nts
"t _>> o_ establishing _nitial
b. Z z� \ r y „
�•� t.lttv.'tis :C' �-1E_`;r ' IS,\'t ;CC�Iy Shall mea/an
u e4 ra anL k 1 ive
�..t _ion c f v
z it 1mooted by
C. IC :P1"G , '.l. Cs '
the C,_.4 i� �.t C ,:i.' � ]C:c .tr�'i!1 t-o and relaSJ� U
l C I s of tyle urha-J W3 rural
srow ih
c _ - es abl i s_
-n _y, Forrun-noses (
inc =r a O nt ,�t c,C ,on Of aCr1CUlU1"al
_an an 1 _. r _.� 1 b' e f,-c,m the Soil
n =
<Jr;; f s Uric Illi ui?.
�� �u 1'.SrJi r: aJ, n o
Conservation u _ �.
r _1loc_zt , - -am. _�,s of
r. �., c
sMural or i0C,qt l �arJ.^s
iJ DC 2 - -
Lh L,c,t r c ali be
v 'd for
E.. l a TL or j e l_`
_ Y _d
f.. = sources siva Ll be iT c-n or,
1 l
and E-
lands \Ic
at aj:e T, .L in
- .t t lr t 4:':i:rl i ,C r �,r rd for _ a _ .CP, of
.- "- c
--_ r c U Por t =11LU're
the
o
m = "I,f _ n
h - r Jr
n _ .
of, P-J
t c
-
h.
... �an gy
1 .,r l
i t ,7. L i t hi. G � t ''s
E'S n rr r t W G17 S J t ' 5
- ._ _.. .
.DIX
HOUSINGCRAG M MCT AVE A;V
f Land T'se .
,
L a V... y
a.
17 !"
^.�n'.-'\Di x
'N3 CC
i _ �.j3:1 �..._ d.'(.:F' r.':.�i?�:-�=(1 t4;t �'r?�i�»1
Til t *tl 't,..+ :� i-nT *v��O r'r 3/ :-^y�r -•J(;�4 _e Ii t'!-'e Sic a e ;!!311'
? for L s are seve:'?1, ',ot .ic? >JC`St ? r%CY'�dI?t 27"`':
1 , � hensive l;;L 2 is a ;e-- cl r3�y brca6br US'i'1
:2
C:'iC _ _71t which does not �_treat r^J•l1 el "=-,?I7t5 1I1 the
d,tyl required.
L. no ..s _hborhood . _ n C: .:e?: 1t 1pr,Y at cr,.',,-, S of
•''•_o c� _..:!".:^1�C .r, u�':.aiZy .,,u�� %J nc. r':fll_,}' BG:ir'�'SS
-_ _._:a-- 'L-A -'N 1 e c -: S.
+`. �� •- _--man .�%Y.'� .. __i.:.V r^':. c<<i . ..?� � (`,'�vo��:;'."3 � .^.a�..LS
cf
C:'r uit Sr C
�IY11.{- .. e^f`n._. y h ,'e c-vner&hip 6n c. ��!�r
c . _y : ,p twel'.. . _. uniis per gross acre in suitable _.. _hs.
?r - r v �y t r _
z,, C
cf'+ C . (_
Npjg'Dorro,Dd Men
5-'L #2
Ar t r - -j _ rri
t L.
a _._ that _ -
rl.._ a r old have 1E- .. 07 B`F`I: :C.. .. ��., 4_ .._ Com' �1,.e C eS
C
To provide a basis for h.e1-,inn -`o beat the cu__ -nt and rjro -c4 ,d
anticipated housingee? 2s of the CO?�riFrii ty, Tiz,aIrd's iousi na
Assistance Pan established a first year goal of ,0 t:nitil
s and a
three year goal of 160 units of assisted housing.
To further facilitate reeting 'the identified housi: g -h:.ed, the
`�'ashin.-ton County Housing Authority has suggested sav-3ral
policies that would : ?Ka -t e-as er rQr, -those sf-- _n- Z otic nv
1 1- - .�-
in the co::rl�..duni 4y. i11..'y eli,-e that ..P j,.e ads ' � -n ^�
r of t:.o: U:. �l.la
who are currently "ceing priced out of y"tl-a _..a::'--et olace due to
increased housing costs can be .yet "if policies adoptad have the
flexibility to allow for smaller lot si-es, for provision of space
for -mobile hones for zoning that will provide for Planned Unit
1'3velc-ments, as well =:s for _iulGiple min"sir;;; _nits in zr-rioirs
sizes, frcm duplex lots to fairly large size 'multi-family
Complexes.
i
.fin excerpt from 2_ letter to the City e�r Tigard from the Washington
County rousing Authority.
r,.
�. 20
t
t^ cm Cr. A ,T' 'T"IO�TT�T CIr:��Tr�y+n...-�� ..�..7yR•- -i-tt mll"�^pT` j.
1..'�i 4. CCI:.V__T\t i,l•_V....� .1 •�r ..L.:.."_ .. .:._ . �'r_..t� trfE
In 1076, the CcSt of y- net•,', Conven+_onal si^'r-1e-far-i'_y 1"cTe it
Ti6arc? averajed about ;'45,000, white the very IOY.'G'St cost units
could be purchased for abo'_,t �,'7,c,'3,000. '.1""'at 1C''PZ of inc., w, s
recuirec for on n t,.,4 l '.�;-s a e r r-.^c ,_J? y
P f' �: Ce t.'t'�e1 � 1...�+. �Q L%� .)u rC �P r. C;,�•^l Y.� j
conventional 20a dova—i payment, a standard 25 y:;ar r:or-'C1,aSe at
�Tj interes-, and property taxes at 1124 per 5'.1.000 of asse:'sed
Tl'
a .4 'tj}loo:
t`,7 A 0G� Lowest cost convFn`i Gnat nen.,' home
-7,000 20r dcwn
�'2?,000 loan at 011% over 25 years
235 mc. principal plus interest
+70/mc. property tai- ("240/y r. at `24/_`1000)
exclu.!-_ng, insurance, s:air;t-nanc.:. and u ,11 ips
.'inc= r,2' s'usually do not E-rant LTiC tG2aCs t,' is ^C"2 t_ -n 25
Cr E?r^^c income ::'ou:l a2 required "or tiF' cosi_� ar. u41 �, CE
^ E Df 2t 2eatit "�,_ -4^ _S tC pur_l nse the lC'°'est Cc t
.:eVT :.Qe i n r'iaarrd.
` 4.5 000 cost cc_nven._f cn=1 new ..c'7P �
--, 100 205 d ct%r
1Qtr. 2t Qj E'v'er `25 - -_--•c_
S, P? mo. e.ycludinE is sure-nce, m3lnte_ia-cF -�nd
An c' nnu r'O_s neo e oS1i6 is ' Fa-aired crurc, '_ar,c n
2L"c'-a- cost con—. e icnal new iC j
y c,1' 1 c b^rd r _l�cS hac3 e C ;2 a tom: iter n c"me r .l G,l 4 4
in 57E, r'�c': �e2ns the r :er,-E;e '.-cuse`�c1: ccu_ ,.. t _rfic .c
f
1
Other estimates of new conventional housing costs, using slightly
different, but plausible, essumptior_s yield even grimmer
stzl,isticS. The Preliminary,* ashinMton Court HousinE Plan
(1975), for instance, assumed a 0� down paynent an a 30 year loan
period and included insurance and maintenance costs in its
calculations. With these changes, a x34 ,500 house purchase
recuires an income of $21,600 and a X45, 500 house requires an
income of �`2 7,7T4.
3
22 -
z. : ;
A 1,'1-Y'. ::,".A
f ' fj.-rn r.nT'� A?.Tr- Slv.r^..� .7�1�
. .s.."._^,^C�) .�.. _ r...✓ ..._.L i._� U.,✓__.�T L.___...iw1
j
i
The c+- i ♦ ro ,i cn of 1icusing units which, r r `u rout is very
ri f fi.Cul t to es-imat c a,cc c_:c�l_ _._e Censu''s Count 'is Lest cxCCuryte
b;:" 7s available Orly at
:^,-�'Crr __ _:"e eI-,tS. Qi..h ' r'et. 00S C* sse,
ing •_,cancy rates are less an-'—aVe c arac.veristiC S_'?-rtComirrc, 1
1
k 0 1t ITl e--fa ily ( ,airly a" .�_:_t) cacti. ^y ='C ?c t ciar t�-rC r f
=a-25e,'s fire '1Seful in 1'-at � :ey C___ ? Ccnc!-,ct d rela''y'_rely easily
4.^_C� ?"2 J' 're efC_'C' Ue mic,s+ --p_t0- 'V`r' "1C1^`' 2T t `�',� E' 77&y �e 2 -'?S i
--uc 2 surve-s toward un er-Esti-mciion of vacancies iV ;-'DH^tment
man:_7ers desi-i to report b-usi.:?es_ ::e t -wr tr,ar it is. In Au-U t-
�"J-�:^. l J"f ria slim-,ey of V J:rd -cart_-n`n.i.., C ......_d --ni c.:,e.-.^�?r--
CO rlc:� %� a nC`: rate _r
o ..s i _S r t__yr` S i
eI"21 cL 4 o`it C= C1 - a a, D... _ c ^1_' S c_C ::C t"'Can !!
c-eS• i
i
".-^_e ✓ �.Stol C` C�' sT�_ ^- c `- t cr.rer by 7 L' and cconmy:,Cye? 1•y -he
.,.T. C. _ ..., tG1, ...... ?�._^..� rt .!1_.+ ccn n,A`n C L,:-.�'_: .1-)'� C.
r_ri cdlc ,-'i^ t c c' eC `. #
'1rc+ .ic ::e+ r
iS ? ^L v2t t_:?,_ ct<_ 'e, Com_. C7t _.._ 1-a a 1 ;_ca ^e e-c -.c i
v_
gra actually r c ? ir�,n. =: __;c r- ,_. c^^ C: : ^lam `� _ ..
nc— iec t-,^ -l-;.. ti _-ent
i
}
_ ' !7inzia73-
vaveT,:cn 2.1 v,n 1,7 4.1 f
7 .0 �
ar (C-7227) 1.1 7
_ J 1
al ^ 4 'C _ ^^f. C=. = rI' c eta 1 ,* t nr 4--
fre �o. r::e t')' ✓, th_-..ti '_a._ _.,ce"' U..i ts CC-St c+io
a v aC :v. r'r•_c r e�e� i '' vy:
Lr iL i, _ n_- � he ccm ani for tin _ 3
1 -fin t, C}r mill c J _'e l..t = .i- - -S _ l ^r? c5 Y aC2 i. Al s,� rac-
tS Cr :a '_T3 CP_ ?-,.ave _n;rJC�r, I � 77. Cf,!L _�ec as +Gr Cii
i
+' al t. _;CF: C" afSS -, -U:"'2° W2
. .:_ ._::C. th ,.. _7n -_70, _n?' eT.c:'..pey n s C':)'_.i__+
LC1'e r rates Cf ht�.e -uncial slzr",re is. yL'n crtur_2:ely, the yFail, i97i
Ccstal vacancy ra':e+ survey s _T_'Ct yet av"aila11-2e, s^ a direct ^c,M-- f
i a sc-n fo-r reC;en ._C`nt=. is ::„`v pc -,s i Cl.c.
i
i
2 7
G7 +� Ql r C✓ CT. I L`4 ti N
C`.1 u-,r`! Z)
Q N N u u1 il LCl H C
NCZ
�;v
t�
F'y
U1
E-4
r . r
E-4 r; ( _
•J
G r' C
cl
r
4'
Cj
C7.
k K C• r L
r i i
C r
C7 C' sSG GC
rc, cU� •c, :�, Fes;- t
- 24 -
'ne soc'_ally Jvcir .,:le vaC:E-cy _r e fC. sl-,-__c f
i�,., :r c," _` I, s.S.p .1-a c ^.r. I.T. :�� 1_Dc so
ms 3. 1e-fam2_a' � S, c � �r, _
-Lola t_ ere is iZ,.>>�_I_�_ _Ifi rA- ;; 1 ,1 � _ W_.- ^L
2 ;ffBCi cr. c�lec 'i.^n or 2-P -.t,_ ui�.'S
t
nc
add, tical units.
pattern of t'ie Co._._,lrity. In rUp'_ClJ :' C ' a r ?5 S,,c11 as
.-ate sllculC 't_ J_;�r t <-n in `,,o" a slc ,.y c - areas.
ar t oSe c� 52C ^at :S t -vim s ' 2r 11Z a rl -_p�_ l' U-11
+5
G i C - �!
shculd ha,.,e a c a' ate ���,,,-ter ' ' �r;d �•;�z ;s � 1� Gss��e
v C c^C"
For
units, 'cf t_:i,^yr rc..-..._
acc^I'dirlg u-o :U (: a es ate of 1•`l � - 2• as '� .;al" for
single-family Tlrits�
Acccr•^i^~ to the 7cst rev=r_L ''�� v-?C nc: r?t
t �r� "Zire� l`-i, _�..��' `v aCnnT"iy .0`�I' 1. ltc vl?l µ�.a:.,.,_COI." .ri..�'.j; ,�.. ' 7 !,
i. v, _'''c. a�... ., .
p c•+,cln-ft -,l.r .`r? c „2:e in tr:t�' 2:Ca a �2 1S �,tili•l ! ?tet P
accertable --ran-c ? o .,ila L'l e-{^-ni , cancy rate t 1'01:e v e". is
e ii Zr?il2b=_I_ilr p- cT art fent. .in this are? iS
4' ciel�'
Probably '"'e2 ts to
y
25
t
t �
4
t�t
f
370y-. R -X P CTA`ATIC' S
r
-rec
'-ed the avai labil it-Y Of
r'!n of the Ove all ca`-,5�'S w'f=C.h i^38^z�ura``e with the
s8 Dili �y of
4-•e - e ranges co. "-e
r.< ral
housing uni-s and prs �, e} ectation of
�. is �.ne increasedP
potential home buYer
public.
For example:
r was 840 square feet
In 1970 a typical home
2 bedrooxst 1 bath, garage,.. and a few built-ins
Costu00
interest rate
7 out 10 >ce :zrg housing could afford it
in 1974 a median. new
ho��se was 1560 sq. ft.
2 car ga.are, lowed with buily-
a
b?f.r�or.ls t baths,
1^5 �, :'sa Ynyy, 4 uut 10 ye-so^s could
in;ems es'L
rc�tfiS5 a u % c
afford it
C'St
of -T.71 _amily
$79,000 C
kl
r �T,d inter=st rates have �xrluced
.gin essence the COSI a
any Potential buyers from the market Cl ace.
p�p �
4$� 26
s
IDIX F
fundainental reason biahind 't'he grow-in' pouring probl€'n around the
'1 as in tae Portland arta is � e declin.Lrrg si2a Of
nation as well
householdsaver,,_ e mimtier of indiy- 61Iais living together has
Vitae dreri,,; for a n � ;aer of c s bec o; st?t.h -factors 7 = h r
22 .e_ f Land " l *er families. I T
divorce rags, le�;ax� srr?. �e �x'yes, he
the Portland atropolitan area in 1960, the average household size
,vas between 3.1 and 3.2 parsons. This sigUz—e .as only 2.7 to 2.8
in 1974.
In concrete 4az means
s, •this decline in household sine i�iso
For every 100 Portland area residents .in 1960, 31 r,.e llings
were needed.
For e v X23 100 .a- v1
arld arca , 45i . :•v in 1974, 3( ' ,>all :r JS
Were needed.
7n 1974, 6 mo�re homes were neraJed to hci.)se -the s_ t e
number of P�O-P e
living
OOfl had to�!y �r5 cellars "De oo`: i;,"t2G�i.£d yn
L� t9? rs i
at " W
from 1960$to
c haT„"S iTi } _er,Ll d
area
size.
27
\
I`• v Tf'iC •.T m-_'t, Iz{ F ✓ _ — 1,a` f P
^c, tr " _--I C. C. ?l. !.il` 'T �Ct�'_ 2S n! v"-- ?^fir 1 71 r
there
4.
TV T
1 35? Z e15
2 4�� �� n 505 ?7
3 -` 4
2-z0 c 35
eye
4r-ll 2'4-7
52
mrn.-
7 -_
l u t -
r
m'_.E'T2 are c lrC3i?vcfEllr 6t!4 U.,res of 't�nri wi ,ni11 }-'-p t i n^ ".?"c?,
i' C? r 2 �,�
_r i": 1(�P:_"tl=..."C y�-:�c T'c:c��r �J ��`-r--,.a C' �'-2SSj .7.r tiC--G '
res—, c'Ct_'ve Yn"'CCnt of -L `^! X_ Z4
C.1
•T'' :l i 1 CT 7^N 7 T n. C_ T ��..�._r�.._,-1 T - ??I�.., c•r�1_._�._.n-./`—��� r.' J,y
1-22.72 ?G n r nC 1•^. Gi C'�_ .`-C
✓�
2 244 44 !5 4:•S4 t 6l t '� E 75 ! - G
•J •IJ
61.41 ?'_., 31•62_ 0 5, 5= 707.7c
435 5 2.7C' 76 `17 ;17. 7u ?/:n 2c
7 -71 77 'x.74 2, ?�
"_
- _
4.
2
L 7 • n r. n. r..
r
-t % ..
02
t.0 C_.7��
2 cc? c,r- -. C" _ `rr: sr .1 S
20
'x�
123.
87
3 673, 2"; 25.41 L5, 52 C 744.-
^, f� �^n
` Gi �
' `-
5 1QC. 22
6 1275.606 S. 43 C 1310-C 3
7 933.97 . 74 1 C ��! 7,
y
+.W A V4 �- ✓.-_ .Y
'eTT- T h' m;...^ r ,w t.i.
7�
30
"Very fCYI l ,!er CC:ZL hC21 zJ R.1.t.?iz'at2'..':. s ,i -':ntly exist in too;—tyfs
sous n a _e,t;.it his Csi ;Il ..5 Z _, .,.'. .:a bi.:ed on a st:Fri's UT
`r r v�_i'. :`7t a f' li�1Z
{
-S a 1l? . .. _ ? ? i q 4� -� lS 'JPvI n
CRAG's Por
975 7 (? Of 'i_,v _.._._nS sold ,'GI' ? r'^
, _:.rs old
CT 5 5 _:S o l_CI
pr older.
_ I'cE1 c C_ S . �'t? r±r•t tcl _.` C d:.e UY'Cn47
L4 r',bi 1 , Se.
y. 14obile hOme Darks are full in z:-Ie F r l ':�' , t;
__'-G_2i7d _, thG'�!�.�1�X21 ;�i't:3y WZ i._7
vacancy rate o .3
5. -labl_C -I:'G= 3 = :",-J '_s t mobile " c.-n_-s has led t0 :ingl_rg out his
d`Crisp !}f ::L:',75 • ns t --et--c, CSIi=l?l ey CtiC. t 4,'^cYl 1T7
tact _^e-
c n
SZ.?�t<Cd ;!: 8 a:�'•^tJI' y�'I'J. '' i
I'Cbile hog s are ua - - _
r7?iG3 r 4` ?`J' C'!: C-_r:.-:'l=1" `o 4 s _..n -3, ;—"i zed �s a m.�_?., ;rat
_and ii se r� f. r.`_ ,n _
v _ S 6_ 1CC j t? .. C
'7C.a g In iC^ i i'_'t Crli of te_.0 S li _ �C•
` - {
t a
_ F
�•`T
01V -. r } -r
12c
1,-
e 01
h C. 'a
�'• Xo bi_....eire nCf l ti <.c'• .sa
,G.. There re rio T.2 i:h2",ica1 :aso ns rvr i?oasrii��+ h�
on r,1°1z-i? 1'Jts. m._s
n s.
5• C GC1� G _ t^iC'.:S we re rdCt i1C_`o d .d �ti rl: .:r�'c:I from, 3taJ}`.,i1E homiE_ _
pal`rs
F.. ''.obile home parks Cc-sti't i-Ite ir'_ ��i•L�.a yseiE'_"lbC3T'hoods in the old-
fashioned
dfashioner+ sense D<oviding ph-, s_?cs1 tecarity and relief from
thratzgh traffic,c, as well as, a krc- r% economic mix that is
desira 2e for lamer neighborhoods.
i
SY I
LrTrE7 r r i .4J1
1PS 1^.+rYJ mm S_:;
r .
LN °iii ^^r.r r _ r� ._F.,.
-C)--- , wi th__n the ''§,j +rd u�'uail pj.--n area the r 3 is Of eS_.4 st nv
o
S __die fcr;1ly _i.itS ':3 ^ill i 3 lljT 11TH' S is
2 t0 1 or si ^-l2 fc 1 ly S l LS C nsy.:-cute 64% of the tC ta7 hcuzing
S'GrJC1S { 2�i
un-its) l and 3�?) a--re :iai.ul i--s4urzly ','Ili-"-s (24,2) 2
Based on current, at fu i? tie'Y'c''ltne- n-oAr O"1::..m t-e
ratio Of Si nz e _c'_Ai ly :.mac a, l ` n-i+s t0 units
is
a%lec/s c3 s?yrJli14C a:t ' �C ;`� 't3 i_ IL-lo I Or s—i-igle fl-am-illy
1i'.�iiiS. \1ibltC lit;`r_.tL.i.i.,_ _�...:1��,... ��Si�J'rJ �
n
` r?'7?S f. �'- :,e ..n' l,..cles dur%l'eyss, r.J--c .._...:s fi=ia four t''+.,lexeso
to units]
4 7j
32
r
I
A 51 ND1X K
I
AT' 'CCETS CIF
1
I
iI
s r t.�T,
�1.'.c� �ipzGsl 5t1'bsn deve :T L;{ " tea S`'i 4�Y (�i sc:zb-'wd
u d U s
GLIB ?'.tl }! Of "� f? cqt z r dTri t.il
UIC 1.__..,1saL�1I.
> y that 4-rd :4
4 ,3
SS e
rytJ .-ld l ;, . +v
i „�A �� r _I i--- ,...7 v al 11 t 7 O �' -)rte L 5.01}
f rC. -� ���� Of cn a'�1 rt .1 �i i' :2 t ' 3r.
l _ ^ Costs ". S e3 f C; ;l c,' 7. c S"c c s W-
r AYFie rnl ti r e costs
197- T�.s'5: 4cdGnL � Fl--at ?1;
densities.• - sI#ts ,--
ILS much as
� h as
Capital
Y,a t
t ,jj j _c�.s vere sc c'r
Onerc:ting and m iv te,.'a'nOk' costs of v11 �LC
�',ctcr use
•,�. !ar@ '.w35 �S ;"';ch as Ar" &
z.....r�y `' �-3n �/'�� '-I,l•7'� fir` �.•l-,� -� 1"L.-•..� 1� P1 I ,.. ti ji� �.
v,S ^4....42 �O!")_..t i on i,�,s c 4'�
t'�'. n. -.
Traffic accident
ase h
i
1 Y.
i
i
The tax service Fwact of ADVOI-elit
single faEj.'Ly Ps �:O.,Itynsted
is an i—; 2ortant factor in considnAr-g rIn of
Mon 1 w ? c,?,_.,l ai'lj• 1 _ .�_:,�w. _. City vt Y�.�a�C
y
c 1 i--,-Dl eed a study
that light`v on
t.J r �f h' :;ate. ,�r..'nl ) v;Cj to 4!- ,` d, ,e --'�-�-
, nije its dial _gid find Es _ �..
c: ^c;;lusi ons probably have . 1_` tintial a al.kQit-y civ y `�
n
41';S�r 2S fa 4.1 zZ T r7 ' }�_ :t�.
in c'-or.2-,3ring the --rel a i-vte- financial a ..ve` �S �OZ (�1 cC , % =S% of
single and wilti—fauily r Es , _. l , s, e Nnem
to be_
nearly squivilant. 5.n :thnwwgh tit
to check all the :wWantial
in te�
c_sts.
Oporating of
Per 7n
_ t S-. rl v f Mil f =�.�..>,C
"deficit"tr,� L`;
6Jffa-4,enca is to -.n& higher density-11're
9. n, --.1 7 t .�ti ``:5 _. 01 , _. �„ Y .ice callinytr
arating cos'-'s C_ atOU
J. J.J. t rc1cy sing2a 1 ,_ ar.
st ? w tt fir'_ _w_ l�• 87i .._L..bt_ f l'S*
'i_i =S 45 r.JX111i Jr ' •
L' _j
is .ftee to Cz-_.5._'4j Li ^`e C{S-
r"" - a , '_i 4' Vit- __
^l�' urs t - ;� y_�
more "nwmsi" for the vea, about
1
34 _ 6
..- ?� �_r` C` r-ya i,� �l-
T
a; n . CF'Y =-' :S of ^Ol
,,:•c l_ r .,_.i�:'S Z,S ---V -C_"`:'ir'_.
In +.c-r,!7 i,f c^Il F s L c:_~ _�.i's t >>L C 'rye za
S -Sid, r'1.'c1 vUtr .._moi, 1 _=T yr.p ? C'^'L vri.� �c.?� _v
--j4.
4,er .:�.'.•
-r v.acri.4,w
_-''r?._
._ S ;�I R e_
t ,C+iS on C?=1.!=2'�:.
cte
.—.7+r , •i r.. —1 — s .—� t"4'y� ._�•
- - - -
21! n 1
Lr
t
.yea
+ ry�
4S 1 N7 'x.01.+—+ 1 `•i'. 'j 1.,. __ - I
-C,1,1-;,,G .�_� t 1�
_
E
t;
hoinetuAld-s. i .r�r `T a,n§31_jf,S The
th -t there
a� , '� uus, d Local EL,V
and s,,,ZYdivislt'n 4 `
`;; - }
c�
ea�. �r e.. Y x t�_ r s irn r , r
a
CS ztl _s a - t fi i
�� � `�` �___S' cr � r xi �.<11 r
,4id hs r Ctd i r c y;r�� 7,i ']..i.�vbe 3 � -'. C� Yv
Testi!; tcz of �� v y:
)0e. CBjit2ji Cj "eft G i 5 rot to be . tr., drt
? {
1{
stQ, ? . tTc OS
,2F G' -_�rSof c:t
1� .'„ y.:ir r C+sl
r `E
�o review. t
Y -
t
COST _Y7 F a gl lTO
'i 40 LZC` !"
T �
mo
yS
-At
T• J.
CN
_ _r .._lii1� �.UU'���� or _�. 4✓ vi 1O
ril
�' }
l °w?:,,� r of Gt.S:
TYS�P're a v..� �='T, 1�:� 4� i .� �•7 sst ._C-.yY �.
2 c :3: V s.�, J A t}.
t,here is a � y
2.
aY 5 PP
r_ eev l
_ £. e��d i-^-S 3_4 to Lamfeell- Gil ._.l
L7
to
Ure ak in C
I
�. 4 4
i9 Z•rJ v i_l th
Sidc'?ev,al k are nl _?":.c1.Lc:� -?"`trl i•P ly ,.� -^,� _...._ -
J 1t U_ Q
side of Vne s f_ ,.z e, --.n uL
to tht? ?'adlus of "`_j'i 3
r � :
bS e��2_. s
in eln a t_'^V 4, ''fl ."- t c;
for a t-otal s3k _s L,s of 2Q.,150• 175•Ofl
is reduced from 5 feet to 18
h
saves 1,320 s^et. -� 5 �0
..
i
he so,---m � :air =r_e 's "e,aUced from 3, 220 lin=arr
feet -o 2,c'GO linear 1'�,'.'"1` ;,at y.S ??er font. l �
i�h e ;st0rM L_ryor"S a r e ^v d ou i- J y I
l!7,p `ovc_-me -1: &-i-ep, which _. _i•�S rock for
and the cost of hauling ,.i'ar excess dil't for
a total savings of 06,136•
6.
nor L_;
, u '-1 =i!+ G'! c'v��t4C Ji.sa _4-�y' e�.�ussN
dirt.
{
t
'rat&rli:i=s cjr r r� tU cE-Cd f r c%M, gcr =a �
if 5'� -'moi? _. e vUsed �
b.
� i .
C. '!'i=e savings if cast it On nive -were
in the exist-,-Ln� S :sCc�.._^C`$ b-7- A-c i re'
J
L
sewer connections, and >,`ztsrliie
Conn ci i o-ns on about half f the 1CtC +'c":ld be +
a-J"lc:ed by 4 ice?t per lot. e
46.80
_ 31
s
i
ZP C"Y: r to
Q t S tv t:rl C 7 c
1QL24:I2� 1Q C r t 4 .i.0 1 a` Jr a
'4ry :�s �S
� y '� e. Ci" r ? .� i.;��
of
` 4 to
dIn
Of
a. presently
b. V ^Gr-= n:� -it-hin Ore
-en ed
(2) The prcpc_--- o 1i~arc��
-9000 (41 �, _ard S :Li2 - ?L` Y,?ate .��I ,�r, (' jeGc
77
5 Q
!_`
17
Lb r
v 1� :'l �tOs Cis W'i"`-'n kid +>' -
C err 7
th
2� t� �-� v' o. y'^ 1Cll �;11
... a.:
f
CZp•+=''v� Jy} t„��y y ri .,ter• -.pry r'�; a�`� Gr ,�
Zr
....:ann 4 C. .`c' :z
bers
nssfbly- be
,y.c w7„Q� r¢ `e .t.�.,-?1�3' 'l;I�..cved. _ f-�iy !'T 4 `°3 � ,� .s. .��
only 0-7
One ,. -'=le eaZ_'IC=I' pe— f'.^th� ."L, es map
1 � 4 C
1y os0ia
" : P
i.
- -
tnnca Plan
To to-Oar WAIMAto qVntiflnd
rin4^S lvUg p F. c _d zA of -..
_.:..is ti.� _ ✓. �..- -..� . 1Via .... ..
O Fj , lot for _ .._
— —
o _
Tynnin
w _
x
APPENDIX 0
cc 4
THE HOUSING AUTHOR.{TY OF WASHINGTON BOUNTY
245 S Phone E. Second Avenue, Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 (503) 648-8511
-
tM,SSIDN E RS:
..Huygens,Cha4r man
g,Fanning
H.Pittman
M.Wallace %.
rVe" January 31 , 1977
NSEI: t
B.Duncan
;CUTIVE DIRECTOR
C-Cable
I!
_City of Tigard
Planning Department
12420 S. W. Main Street
Tigard, Oregon
Attention: Larry Swart },
Gentlemen:
The Housing Authority represents the interests of the low-income {
people of Washington County in matters of housing assistance. We
e City of Tigard is in the process of
have been advised that th
adopting a housing policy. We would like to see incorporated
which we believe are desireable and
into your policy criteria
necessary from our perspective to make it possible not only for
the mousing Authority to assist low-income elderly and families
within the City of Tioard with rent subsidies, but also to make
it possible for developers and builders to produce within the
city's boundarles, housing both single family and multiple n�
which will be within the ownership and rental means of 10-E;i
moderate income families.
We believe that these needs can be met if policies adopted have the
lot sizes, for provision of space
flexibility to allow for smaller
ning that will provide for Planned Unit Devel
for mobile homes, for zo
opments, as well as for multiple housing units in various sizes,
from duplex lots to fairly large size multi-family complexes.
Providing for a wide rarge of housing types within your community
will make it possible for those who are of lower and moderate
income to work and reside there. We would that your
policy address a program of actively seeking subsidized housing for
your community other than that provided through the Housing Authority
rent subsidy programs.
Please feel free to call upon us for any additional information.
i
Vej y/ ru 1), yours
_ U --CAB-LF.
Executive irector _ dQ
LC/cd
APPENDIX P
D7T - =(,�' z 77. 71V T_m TTf-F J, I^C'7'I 1. 7-nl
i workshop o? �o�ti.i^ ;,.,_ T , ,u. r-, o
i�l1C OL2r1 C 8 held 021 1�e 12:c SClay t a 1 10 s
10,77 at `";ti2j'+V junior ` i` ^t',001 a � OI �t^e ho'2sim7 \'crk•
scl7et ule approved 'I-,_vi"`' ee or_ .' VO ` @i�el v.
o- 'he , eG inao .•eQUragting Cit. e _ar'1_C c C O' a<1G emp`,agi 17inc
r: t ,` P 4'C_'r.Sr'L�w V,ati „ +_ L VC. I'Sa_ _ r
imno_ mance o _ ► -
ir_cludirg
p
SC
All TT PT,"a i:! ,terq
CO-Thai?"Len of CPC 7-a
_ocal 7.endi2.g _nc 1Ll �ia_s
Ad'ecent icira ' -
Decal _-,oL'e Co2"str-c ti on _'_idul +;TV —p e assocIF-__' c
Local aned�acentr Social l'el a-e o_'an - O? S
Locals aCV,aCP.rT S'a e a :: _ederell hous_1 g a c= C-=
n the
Purdic at�r10L''_".ce e'en' s 0I t�0, S r�� an ?C u:t
r `
r'n d _:ice'-"n-
A 9� .F ci .+a (��,` -,•i e,_;T`r LLC C 'i�'OY'_:G•`!C� C 1`71_C;
� 0 x L_ r \- 1
'e __c ._ c M's . c�_or inch
IS
01.V_ TC-'
`-
e staff _ .. . -
nv C` r,.,c ate r r r
_ o __t. c _e _
'i C' c._ c'___C
r.2.
C .'fin ya7 � c J
re- 'm'7. e up
_ t
P• ev=ry! a of ie «�, �_ --4 -mac
`
ren S ,.•."`y'cv c 'a-,*rcat :J..T~ �.. _. i '_'Ce'.
ci' 1_ _
cws:
Local
elow-ccs- e C
ana
C, nc
C'.-
Oct --y
f
F t d
e rs
c
o-,-,�.:r 0
V E 2
s e resi 'ent f e 71
M
pe 0
0
n e- v el- on bla a n c
tae resident ori
C e r
1, •z I �' c,
a e e 1- Slid c-e n
n,C t.
-171
There %%-as o. s7 Ot si
es
eve- less ). E?21 c-c,Ar a c
1-15C-� Several c--l.e---
,i Dd'v u
s b e,
F, c: n-
e ce s s a ry 's
to rc,--,!
nd re
of c
t-
pp
p
C,
ref-e-c—�
C:,
o" E4 4
L
.r. — .a.--,
un��s
D V 1 S 1
fr:
2 11 n C,T
tc- d i t f c n
Ur
elz
7more
an nd;ca
J rL r, c
f Cru n
ou s J n,
dra�-' ed to -L-S
C
42
C:7 Cncn-.Irr '1ni- AND S1?,
The size Of lot Of a s, n^7le--fam'=ly ho-ne is an i_portant Z= n--
ant of its total cGSt, .-` eci2lly with the cost of land rising
n13Ch faster than i;ti,e Feral inflation rate. The cost Of a a
developed lot censti':'-rtes 20�-25� Of the total price e' a re;,•
done.
In the 'Tigard area t' e permitted lot size for single family k�k
homes 1S �f1U` square fc t (f Cu:it� .e) C'JPT^C+I.�Z7 S' rStE'(1 i
a i+o r,:at_ �'e'` 5,000 SGL'&rE rCnt. ' 'LhE' -,_-in- _+�*n lo. cl2e�].n i�O'"'tl2nC
G '
hfor exam-,,le, where large �e +, o_s •- t;e 1� y consist Of Te
_ d
ba-r-hoods i�,,Lth hoses 'on
such lots. C_= ares with t'-e current
lCytiact Cost CGnT%e.^:ti0 2l home 1n i^e area - i'�5.r%00 -
homes cn 5,nOO sc i rE' cc's
ess, _c_ a savl2:os Of batween a2�,00 an,4 �i��l. _n_c ^, t
re(-
uC t�Or♦ would t home t s l^ pl of o- s ffn2_icnnt umbers
ould make h o eo vier t7 noS e
of families.
7!00!-'
7�?7 ` . 20 (lot CCS :,/i,c tial cost.) - fi f
.L: , X .25 (lot cr)stltotal cost) =
.07 t' k 5.�n n.1C1C�
�.
7
_ 43 _
Tr �?e_ta. ri'r� Ln2 2�cr,'�'?iai oo ' la' On Of ..n m= --ard t
order
?s 11CC2`SS3_'3' to know: ; 1j +ne amount or I-an d ,, ,ich is not already
wilt uTJon, (2) the tonin", on tris land, and?kl') -:e aart of
*:252 lwn iS !thi-^ _s =�:ail '�le and suites-ble for _'eSJILd n t i al
d eve l opment.
For ur- cSes o- the D'a?l-able landS '__iventcry, it 1dzS ass;I'_'ed
..r. i• .it_ `^' ar b,-,1 not 'tet
ti?at areas reC7ntl' __ _.:. .0 �:: y .y U y
rezoned would eventually `ce _ zo.,.rd -Lo ..-�. It Y;es also asvw�,ed
that all land c1ti__ed by :c L rn. n" =`_-•-,C7 es \re C. , Ti-gard 'C.'-^,00l
District, j1n1`?ed cewe age _5e:1Cy', etc ) a_nd o";�e 11^c t,1C:ZS
(eg. churches,
-or
ctC. ^ no' 1` ^2 ?t'c?1a�le
for develorment.
"anrk S�ai t ble for dev'el o_hent was cziculated
1 . The 200 Veer floodplain
2. Door?v draiLne^ =2s along waterccursIs
C}�_C>::S d^2tr:?�e S'';81eS
sad:
� Sit `es of 2C: more
lYi tom" b2 ?S of trasn ^s 'A?" 1iC; S, ;,_ E' c ?a` lz a 24a_lable
t
.._ad S?.�.taC'_2 "Cr rec�o2_.._.. _� Ncv i r enn �.; .'s _.e2,cur24 ca1ci:.�2 ped,
and '=GuL?�_c 72C _ ^_e `�_ _ 7e+ ',I ed 'l___ _._ 2. r'.� C 7 r_
"rare l�f l +_�:p.,'.. 1^•ea e >� 20-
I
�
1_.ne. r �i rLl l r_Vy1 r -m under eXJ Sti''' s.o '_ -T this Wol
a11cw an Foprc,x 2'�2 onul_ation increase o-
r
A4
� 1
S1
t
BIBLIOGRAPHY
3
i
Y
i
5
i
5
L
MPJ,
S
n,
mt,e Costs of "-,raw `x:�cu'i e al iI sta -esearch
Cor oraticn, =_LTi', __ I .
.0_.SAG Re;�icna1 _i_o-us4 .' -,-,rl-sh`o�-cs, Columbia ;.egio _ :^c snristi *
of Coverr—ments, Snring, 197=.
CRA.v `egicrna1T1`Orksho_s, Re-Dort, Columbia nnloi c'
,-ssociation OI Gover_:,e" ts. 1, 'z*cr
1C.7-
air Housir_r and xc!_!2siC,_ ary - c, Use, yr-'a:? land Testi ute,
Research agrcrt 7.77 1574•
_T=acts u •o. r'� o_ r r
^iGy�l "'^,ar'�,;c p? Urban - >�lc,n-rnn in �,a'-� na, ?O. �._',_'C_. +__�Z O�
.r�e Csveagc ,i c-I arc _=itchiscr ",7, 1976.
C^l r"' Te ra rirp.F tr 1 'si` Dr•t,and Are 3 eu a'_.'1_Tl r
t _
_r.Ets, 07e;^on rt2.1: :c^_'c^ 32111;e s c-s- c I a ic' V .^ _ iC?L
V'i t
4.
e !_'^O c, FI)e r a 7'c r? s ^._1e.)_ -'t
s
ne vc.._:�� -.mitteP `* 97�.
"cr C„s 4 a.1d :'e c nl e __'+ C -o -`,c -_ ,_cin _.�Z%-
.-..�1 ca,.. J.1 .-...r,... rev,?`”. - 19 A-ash 'l'cr
tc =?r'._ce Ot, -g a-.1 C
-'
45 --_
v
Tigard NPO #I, Plan 027 Avenue, Tf.'fi , 1974.
Tigard NPO #2, Ulan Or G'_ eenburg/Brockside, February, 2975.
S
Tigard NPO r3, Plan for Derry Dell/Foot of a.:11 M-ounta;r,
Eecenber, 1975.
?.'asririr,tor. G^only ComMrenensive Freme:acrk Plan-, November, 1973.
t
OW 46
tmF*zr ..s.1