Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
ZOA2001-00003
• S 8 CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = N/A FILE NO.: ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA) 2001-00003 FILE TITLE: RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE PARKING AMENDMENT APPLICANT: Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries OWNER: N/A 9905 SW McKenzie Street r. Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: A request to review and amend the Religious Institution parking requirements within the Tigard Community Development Code to allow for more flexibility. The request revolves around the required seating_that is currently imposed on the development of Religious Institutions within the City of Tigard. The current proposal involves three components: • Changing the requirement from one space for every two seats, to one space for every-4 seats; • Allowing shared parking to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses; • Allowing some on-street parking to occur where streets are designed and physically improved to accommodate such parking. LOCATION: Citywide. ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2 and 2.1.3; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765. CIT AREA: East/South/West/Central CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request COMMENTS SENT: DECEMBER 27, 2001 DUE: JANUARY 10, 2002 DATE DLCD NOTICE WAS SENT: DECEMBER 21, 2001 (45 days prior to ISt hearing) DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ['TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ® TYPE IV ® PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: FEBRUARY 4, 2002 TIME:7:30 PM ® CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: -FEBRUARY 12, 2002 TIME:7:30 PM M ri4 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION ® PROPOSED ORDINANCE/AMENDMENTS ® STAFF REPORT ® DLCD NOTICE ® VICINITY MAP ❑ SITE PLAN STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171, Ext. 388 Nor ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TYPE IV APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 • GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP.HELD WITH: 8 r '�� DATE OF PRE-APP.: 2-5— O f - Property Address/Location(s): N/4%. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): � : :;";. ,>;. ` ' .: £,.�. •..... " :;� -, _. //'� 2.c. P1. 0. , Site Size(s): `Receipt No: '.. : . ; ; Application `ccepted-6y:: l '. ' Property Owner/Deed Holder"(s): �::_ 49: "Gate:� . 1 .�3��a (.`' :<�';.� .• a �'" : ,, _. Address: Phone: City: 1, /e Zip: L y Date;Deter'mined Complete ::`> y:;r Applicant*: �i�l A L KT lJ V A_L t/ C -R*5"1 . M _`r p T Rev.8/4/2000 =d islcurpin masterslreyised\ioaa.doc Address: qq05. 514) McS6A X:6" St.Phone: 52:03-63 -q/79 City: i 679/0) / O i., Zip: 9 7Z 3 When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written (Note: applications will not be accepted authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space without the required submi ttal elements) provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. L/ Application Form PROPOSAL SUMMARY Rh Owner's Signature/Written Authorization MA Title Transfer Instrument or Deed The owners of record of the subject property request a Zone Copy of Pre-Application Conf. Notes Ordinance Amendment(if applicable)from to ®A Site/Plot Plan (#of copies based on pre-app check list) OR...The applicant requests an amendment to the following sections of the Comprehensive Plan or Community Development Code ®a Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/:"x 11") (please be specific): Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) -A 6/-6 l8, 765'. 2 r;jv, MM h/a 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped #10 Envelopes & Copy of 500' Property Owner List Generated by the City GI.0. - : tts ko M f r�M EIA Neighborhood Mtg. Affidavits & Notes [Filing Fee $1,415.00 1.0/2_ 5 e 4'S i M- Mo-,•v` as-g0.44t1}11 el CrQ /.0 / • • 1 i List any VARIANCE OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements"box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowlddge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this 3/2 day of OC%6 , 66e, ,20 0 I X,04A4...., /22 - klyoad-e,f1Y-et.D‘'it,e_ 6( Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 Receipt #: 27200100000000004018 Date: 10/08/2001 TIDEM COMPUTER SYSTEMAS.RINCK, Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due ZOA2001-00003 [LANDUS]ZONE ORD AMEND 100-0000-438000 $1,415.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Check ST ANTHONY PARISH 0 12933 $1,415.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $1,495:00 • • Religious Institution Parking Amendment Proposals 18.765.030 General Provisions B. Location of vehicle parking. The location of off-street parking will be as follows: 1. Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling(s); 2. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 500 feet from the building or uscproperty line that they are required to serve, measured in a straight linoalong the most direct, publicly accessible pedestrian route from the building-property line with the following exceptions: a. Commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300-500 feet from the primary site; b. The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. C. Joint parking. Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1. The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3. If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. • 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements D. Exclusions to minimum vehicle parking requirements. The following shall not be counted towards the computation of the minimum parking spaces as required in Section 18.765.070H: 1. 1. On-street parking. Parking spaces in the public street or alley shall not be eligible as fulfilling any part of the parking requirement; except; Religious Institutions may count on-street parking around the perimeter of the use provided that the following criteria have been satisfied: a) The on-street parking is on a street that is designed and physically improved to accommodate parking within the right-of- way. b) The street where on-street parking is proposed is not located on local residential classified streets. Table 18.765.2 Minimum and Maximum Required Off-street Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Requirements Religious 1.0/2-3 161 seats in Institutions main assembly area (M) 161 Religious Institutions may provide 1 space for every four seats on site in the main assembly area provided that they supply the City with a parking plan that demonstrates that the peak parking demand of 1 space for every 3 seats is met utilizing any combination of the alternatives and adjustments mentioned in this chapter. SLO1 3DIVYtt34 NOD NQLLV) flddfr' 3'4 v.H . 0 • -e_ PRE-APPLICATION A't� CONFERENCE REQUEST CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION FOR STAFF USE`ONLY Applicant: i L(AL� N ch�.;ST AA) M ; V, 6g_c2U� (� �y • Address: 'H 0� SID Mc KLA)1 E Phone: X 03-(y,35-L1119 Case=No::. :.Y ��CEi . ` . ..,, City: 'A RAC Zip: �) `aola•'?a Receipt No: `aCOI ;"�:. ,:,"'..':° Appi•ication,ACCe aed y:_ : 1 Contact Person: 1- i-:t S: ,c' Phone: 03-4,3'—V/ y IS ` Date: 'I D VI,, Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): ;:`: -.;, DATE:,OF,PRE-AP,P::'"•: '1&5101;:n:_•z., ;:TIME•=.OF PRE-APP. , f.V .Li Address: Phone: -. , PRE APP:.HELD.WITH: " . City: Zip: Rev-12/6/2000; acurpin\masters\revised\Pre-App Request,doc Property Address/Location(s): PP 1k/ 7d ana o U 1 9 A (Z I REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will not be accepted without the required submittal elements) Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): [- Pre-Application Conf. Request Form 2 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: Site Size: A Brief Description of the Proposal and PRE-APPLICATION any site-specific questions/issues that RE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION you would like to have staff research prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are required to be Ai submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a i,,! i1 Site Plan. The site plan must show the minimum of one (1) week prior to officially scheduling a proposed lots and/or building layouts pre-application conference date/time to allow staff ample time to drawn the subject jest Also, show the location to of the subject property in relation to the prepare for the meeting. nearest streets; and the locations of driveways on the subject property and A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 - across the street. weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either 1 Tuesday or Thursday mornings. Pre-application conferences are ' V The Proposed Uses. one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of fi Topographic Information. Include 9:00-11:00 AM. Contour Lines if Possible. ;a' If the Pre-Application Conference is for a PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN MONOPOLE project, the applicant must PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM attach a copy of the letter and proof in 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. the form of an affidavit of mailing, that l the collocation protocol was completed IF MORE THAN® PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE (see Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE Community Development Code). INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM Filing Fee $240.00 ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE GROUP. Receipt #: 27200100000000003803 0 ---��-.� Date: 09/19/2001 U TIDEMARK �� COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC, Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due PRE2001-00068 [LANDUS)PreApp Conf 100-0000-438000 $240.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Check ST.ANTHONY'S PARISH 0 1416 0 $240.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $240.00 Pre-Apps (CD Meetings) September 2001 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Tuesday, September 25, 2001 30 8:00 8:30 9:00 Pre-app Mike Miller 503.750.0399 13620 SW Barrows Rd./SUB 9:30 10:00 Pre-app appt Father Leslie Sieg 503.639.4179/Zone Ordinance Amendment 10:30 11:00 No preap please. BR Pre-app 11:30 • 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 8:49AM Wednesday, September 19, 2001 • • • Church Parking Standards The Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries passed a unanimous resolution on Thursday, September 18,2001. In that resolution the group endorsed a proposal to seek an amendment to the City of Tigard Parking Standard that applies to places worship. The group appointed a committee comprised of Fr. Leslie Sieg(Pastor- St. Anthony Church), Rev. Jim Philipson (co-pastor - Tigard United Methodist Church), Kelly Ford (attorney representing Westgate Baptist Church) and Rev. George Ladu(Pastor - Jubilee Fellowship) to initiate steps to bring about this amendment to the city code. This group proposes the following amendment: That places of worship be required to provide 1 off-street parking space for every 4 seats. This would replace the existing standard that calls for 1 parking space for every 2 seats. It is the belief of this group that the 1 to 2 standard is far too onerous for churches and is more parking than is generally needed. Our neighboring jurisdictions of Beaverton, Hillsboro, Lake Oswego, Tualatin, West Linn and Wilsonville all have a 1 to 4 standard. The present standard makes it nearly impossible for existing congregations to expand their facilities to meet the needs of the growing community and the lack of available land that is presently undeveloped will make it increasingly impossible for new congregations to become established in Tigard. It also seems that the parking standard being applied to places of worship is more demanding than other similar types of land uses in the city. This code also seems to conflict with Public Law No. 106-274, codified at the USC - 2000 enacted by congress last year. "No government shall impose or implement a Land use regulation in a manner that treats a religious assembly or institution on less than equal terms with a nonreligious assembly or institution." Finally, this standard seems to run counter to present trends and thinking regarding regional environmental and transportation issues. It seems that our region is increasingly urging greater dependence upon public transportation and less dependence on automobile transportation. The shift is being sought to both relieve congested highways, as well as, to reduce the amount of land that is being converted to impervious surfaces and thus increasing storm run-off capacities and water pollution that is affected by that run-off. Since this is a prposed leguislative change that would affect all parts of the City of Tigard no site plan or other material is applicable. • • Preapplication Meeting Notes for Church Parking Requirements Proposal: The Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries, an assembly of local churches, is requesting that the City of Tigard amend its parking standards for religious institutions. The Ministries have indicated that the one space for every two seats is too onerous. Application Type: As this is a request to amend the text of the zoning code, a Zone Ordinance Amendment application is necessary. Review Type: The request requires a Type IV review as defined in Tigard Development Code (TDC) Chapter 18.390.060. Review Process: A Type IV procedure of this nature will require a hearing before the Planning Commission followed by a required hearing before the City Council. Once the application is deemed complete, the staff will prepare a staff report to the hearing authorities, and set a tentative date for the first hearing. The proposed amendments must be submitted to the Oregon State Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) and Metro for comments prior to the first hearing date. The LCDC has 45-days to return comments. Although it usually occurs sooner, the Planning Commission will formulate a recommendation to the City Council within 60 days of it's first hearing. The item will then be scheduled for a hearing before the City Council. Appeals of City Council decisions are filed with the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. Generally, items heard by both the Planning Commission and City Council take 4 months. Comprehensive Plan Policies: There are no Comprehensive Plan policies that speak directly to parking for religious institutions. Rather, the Comprehensive Plan policies that address transportation, livability, and urbanization are interpreted to address the necessity for parking to maintain a quality of life and to ensure compatibility between land uses. The policies also require that the citizens have an opportunity to participate in the processes. To address these items, the applicant should respond to the following policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan: 1.1.1a, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3, 12.4.1, and that section concerned with Medium Impact Utilities and Facilities. Copies of these sections are provided with these notes. TDC Requirements: The TDC requires at a minimum (1) space for every (2) seats in the main assembly area, but maximum parking requirements also apply depending on the location of the.facility. Those institutions in Zone A of the Metro Parking Zones allows a maximum of(1) space for every (1.7) seats in the main assembly area; in Zone B, the maximum is (1) space for every (1.3) seats in the main assembly area. Bicycle parking for religious institutions is computed at (1) space for every (20) seats in the main assembly area. S Items needed for a complete application: • Completed and signed application • A narrative addressing the specific criteria in TDC chapter 18.390.060(G) • Proposed code language where applicable in the TDC. Fees: The fee for an amendment to the Development Code is $1,415. NOTES: If you have any questions, contact Brad Kilby at (503) 639-4171 ext. 388 • 111 • Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries Application for amendment of Off-Street Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Requirements Part One - Preapplication Meeting Notes for Church Parking Requirements Part Two - Table 18.765.2 Part Three - Proposal to amend Minimum Parking Standards Part Four - Narrative addressing Comprehensive Plan Policies and TDC 18.390.060(G) Part Five - Attachment # 1 - Westgate Baptist Church review of Public Law No. 106-274 (RLUIPA) A Preapplication Meeting Notes for Church Parking Requirements Proposal: The Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries, an assembly of local churches, is requesting that the City of Tigard amend its parking standards for religious institutions. The Ministries have indicated that the one space for every two seats is too onerous. Application Type: As this is a request to amend the text of the zoning code, a Zone Ordinance Amendment application is necessary. Review Type: The request requires a Type IV review as defined in Tigard Development Code (TDC) Chapter 18.390.060. Review Process: A Type IV procedure of this nature will require a hearing before the Planning Commission followed by a required hearing before the City Council. Once the application is deemed complete, the staff will prepare a staff report to the hearing authorities, and set a tentative date for the first hearing. The proposed amendments must be submitted to the Oregon State Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) and Metro for comments prior to the first hearing date. The LCDC has 45-days to return comments. Although it usually occurs sooner, the Planning Commission will formulate a recommendation to the City Council within 60 days of it's first hearing. The item will then be scheduled for a hearing before the City Council. Appeals of City Council decisions are filed with the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. Generally, items heard by both the Planning Commission and City Council take 4 months. Comprehensive Plan Policies: There are no Comprehensive Plan policies that speak directly to parking for religious institutions. Rather, the Comprehensive Plan policies that address transportation, livability, and urbanization are interpreted to address the necessity for parking to maintain a quality of life and to ensure compatibility between land uses. The policies also require that the citizens have an opportunity to participate in the processes. To address these items, the applicant should respond to the following policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan: 1.1.1a, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3, 12.4.1, and that section concerned with Medium Impact Utilities and Facilities. Copies of these sections are provided with these notes. TDC Requirements: The TDC requires at a minimum (1) space for every (2) seats in the main assembly area, but maximum parking requirements also apply depending on the location of the.facility. Those institutions in Zone A of the Metro Parking Zones allows a maximum of (1) space for every (1.7) seats in the main assembly area; in Zone B, the maximum is (1) space for every (1.3) seats in the main assembly area. Bicycle parking for religious institutions is computed at (1) space for every (20) seats in the main assembly area. • • Items needed for a complete application: • Completed and signed application • A narrative addressing the specific criteria in TDC chapter 18.390.060(G) • Proposed code language where applicable in the TDC. Fees: The fee for an amendment to the Development Code is $1,415. NOTES: If you have any questions, contact Brad Kilby at (503) 639-4171 ext. 388 .�, '.-' �,` ( . \` �` ' �� �v�/ �� � / �� �`~ � • Tub& 18.76B.% Mi,dmmomu and�[usnmumuRequired��[�o/rru*��mhiclmand Bicycle Pur�dog Ragolrumue�s("CoorJ � • :71 ���� `?`*x Postal Services 2.5/1,000 3.0/1.000 4.5/1,000 8.3/1.000 Public Support Facilities none none none none ' � Religious Institutions l.02o���mu��x�b�u�a l.�l.7�u��na��uemh� l.�l.3ouu��mu�uou�b� l.&O0oea��om�uu�m6)y ' (M) . area(M) area(M) area Schools Preschool: 5.0+1/classroom Preschool: 7.0+1.0 classroom Preschool: 10.0+1/oluoernom Preschool: 1.0/cluaunoom Elementary/JR: 2.06)usmnom Elementary/JR: 2.5/classroom Elementary/JR: 3.5/classroom Elementary/JR: 6.0/cluuomoomo • SR: 1.0/5 students/staff(M) SR: 1.0/3.3 students/staff(M) SR: 1.0/3.3 students/staff(M) SR: 6.0/oiuem000z Social/Fraternal Clubs/Lodges 10.0/1,000 main assembly area 12.0/1,000 main assembly area 14.0/1,000 main assembly area 2.0/1,000 main assembly area COMMERCIAL Commercial Lodging 1.0/room 1.2/nxmu 1.4/noom 1.0/10 rooms Eating and Drinking Fast food: 9.9/1,000(M) 12.4/1,000(M) 14.9/1,000(M) All: 1.0/1.000 Establishments other: 15.3/1,000(M) 19.1/1,000(M) 23.0/1,000(M) Entertainment-Oriented Major Event Entertainment l.08oeutsur 1.0/6'bench 1.0/2.5 seats or 1.0/2 seats or l.0/l0 seats or4O`bench 1.0/5'bench 1.0/4'bench 'Outdoor Entertainment 4.0/1,000(M) 4.5/1,000 5.0/1,000 0.4/1'000 , Indoor Entertainment 4.3/1,000(M) 5.4/1,000(M) 6.5/1,000(M) 0.5/1'000 Theater: 1.08 seats(M) Theater: 1.0/2.5 seats(M) Theater 1.0/2.0 seats(M) 1.0/10 seats Adult Entertainm ot 2.5/1,000 3.5/1,000 4.5/1,000 0.5/1,080 1.0/3 seats(M) 1.0/1.25 seats(M) 1.0/2.0 seats(M) 1.0/20 seats General Retail III Sales'Orio�ed 3.7/1,000(M) 5.1/1,000(M) 6.2/1,000(M) 0.3/1,000 I��� Personal Services 2.5/1.000 3.0/1,000 4.5/1^000 1.0/1.000 ~-� Bank with drive in:4.3/1,000(M) 5.4/1,000(M) 6.5/1,000(M) 1.0/1'000 Repair-Oriented 3.3/1`00O 4.0/1'000 4.5/1,000 0.3/1,000 ' Bulk Sales 1.0/1,000 but no less than 10.0 1.3/1'000 2.0/1,000 0.3/1,000 - Outdoor Sales 1.0/1,000 sales area 1.3/1,000 sales area 2.0/1,000 sales area 0.1/1,000 sales area (Animal-Related 3.3/1,000 4.0/1,000 4.5/1,000 0.3/1'000 *., (updated 3/99) Off-St 'Requirements ' 18.765'16 11/26/98 • Part Three Proposal to Amend Minimum Parking Standards for Churches October 5, 2001 The applicant (Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries) seeks to amend Table 18.765.2 Minimum and Maximum Required Off-street Vehicle and Bicycle Parking requirements of the Tigard Municipal Code. The present code requires a minimum of(1) one parking space for each (2) two seats in the main assembly area of religious institutions. The applicant proposes that this code be amended to require (1) one parking space for each (4) four seats. It is the applicant's understanding that the present parking standard was established as a part of a general code revision that was undertaken by the City of Tigard in 1998. Prior to this revision of the code, churches were required to provide: " (1) one parking space for every (3) three fixed seats; or every six feet of bench length in the assembly area or every 50 square feet of floor space in the assembly area where there are no permanent seats, whichever is greater." According to the understanding of the city planning staff, this change was inadvertently made when staff brought the Tigard Municipal Code into general conformity with the City of Gresham's code, which was the most recently revised in the area at that time and thus used as the model for Tigard. There was no particular or specific intention on the part of the city staff or city council to'address the issue of parking standards for religious institutions at the time of this revision. Prior to adoption of this revision there were no specific notifications made to churches beyond the general notification of planned code revisions in the newspaper. Thus, it was not until particular churches began applying for expansion or new construction permits that this revised standard was noticed. It appears that the most demanding standard permitted under Metro regulations was used to establish as the minimum parking requirements for religious facilities rather than the maximum as envisioned by Metro planners. Based on conversations with metro's general counsel, it is the applicant's understanding that Metro's planning standards do not encourage 1 • • or require any off-street parking requirements for religious institutions. Each jurisdiction is free to adopt any parking standard that is less demanding than one parking space per two seats. Therefore, we find in the City of Portland that religious institutions are required to provide 1 parking space for every 10 fixed seats. Most neighboring communities of Tigard have adopted a standard requiring 1 parking space for every 4 fixed seats. Those communities include Beaverton, Hillsboro, Lake Oswego, Tualatin, West Lynn and Wilsonville. To the applicant's knowledge these communities have not experienced any significant problems relating to this standard. In a sampling of 15 churches in the Tigard community, only one church was found to presently meet the 1 parking space to every 2 seat standard. Most churches have parking lots sized between 1:3 to 1:4. At most sites, congregations would need to purchase adjacent developed properties in order to achieve this new standard if they wished to expand their sanctuaries. Thus, congregations would bear the cost of land purchase, demolition of existing structures as well as the cost of construction of parking lots themselves. New congregations seeking to locate in the Tigard community would surely find such costs very prohibitive. The present code also seems to violate Public Law No. 106-274, codified at the USC - 2000 enacted by the Congress. This law reads: "No government shall impose or implement a land use regulation in a manner that treats a religious assembly or institution on less than equal terms with a nonreligious assembly or institution." The present Tigard code requires churches to provide 1 parking space for every 2 seats while requiring theaters and other adult entertainment establishments to provide 1 parking space for every 3 seats. It would seem that the City of Tigard would be in violation of this law since theater use and religious institution use would seem to be comparable land uses. (see attached argument prepared by Westgate Baptist Church— Part Five) Finally, the applicant would urge this less demanding parking standard on ther basis of environmental and density issues. Nearly one half acre of land is required for 50 parking spaces. A church seating 500 persons would need to pave two and one- half acres of land to achieve this standard. These increases in impervious surface would add to the volume of storm 2 • • • water and its inherent pollutants. The use of this much land for paved parking would certainly contribute to urban sprawl. 3 • • Part Four The applicant has been asked to address the specific criteria in TDC chapter 18.390.060(G), and we do so in turn. That section says, "G.Decision-making considerations. The recommendation by the Commission and the decision by the Council shall be based on consideration of the following factors: 1. The Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; 2. Any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable; 3. Any applicable METRO regulations; 4. Any applicable comprehensive plan policies; and 5. Any applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances. Response to G. 1. Concerning the LCDC's goals enacted under ORS Chapter 197, Tigard Comprehensive Plan Section 1.1.1a also requires compliance with them, as follows: 1.1.1 a. "This comprehensive plan and all future legislative changes are consistent with the statewide planning goals adopted by the Land Conservation and Development Commission, the regional plan adopted by the Metropolitan Service District." As to the fourteen specific goals promulgated by LCDC, the applicant believes the requested change is impacted only by goals Nos. 6, 8, 11, 12, and 13. Goal number 6 is "Maintain and improve the quality of air, water and land resources." The proposal advances that goal by reducing the amount of urban land required to be devoted to hard surface paving, which reduces demand on water treatment and runoff facilities and improves the quality of water resources. Goal number 8 is "Meet the recreational needs of residents of the community, State, and visitors" The proposal advances that goal by permitting religious institutions to retain larger portions of their property in non-parking uses, including both indoor and outdoor recreational facilities such as gymnasiums and athletic fields. 1 • • Goal number 11 is "Plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as the framework for urban development." Due to the severe shortage of vacant sites of suitable size for additional church development • within the City, the present parking requirement interferes with the development of needful religious facilities not presently in existence within the city, by eliminating smaller sites from consideration for development by most congregations. Goal number 12 is 'Provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system." Consistent with the goal of encouraging use of mass transit, the proposed change will lead to increased ridership of mass transit to attend religious functions. The present ordinance requires more on site parking than is necessary, and that discourages transit use. Goal number 13 is "Conserve energy." The present ordinance encourages inefficient automobile use, increases ground water runoff(leading to higher maintenance costs for the community's storm water system), and increases electrical use necessary to light unnecessarily large parking lots. The proposed change mitigates all these energy-wasting effects. Response to G. 2. As stated above, the applicant believes the proposal is necessary to bring the TDC parking requirement into compliance with the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA), which is a federal law. A detailed explanation of the applicable provisions of RLUIPA is attached as Exhibit A. Response to G. 3. Concerning the regional plan adopted by Metro, Tigard's current ordinance imposes the maximum amount of parking on religious institutions that is permitted under Metro's regulations. The current ordinance, therefore, encourages use of private automobiles by requiring a great deal of on-site parking be dedicated to them. No Metro regulation prevents a jurisdiction from requiring less parking for religious facilities, or from not requiring any parking at all. The proposed change furthers Metro's goals of advancing the use of public transit and reducing reliance upon private vehicular traffic. Accordingly, the proposed change is consistent with Metro's regulations. Response to G. 4 and 5. The applicant has been asked to address the following additional policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan that correspond to the criteria stated in 18.39.0606(G) 4 and 5: 2.1 .1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3, and 12.4.1 with respect to Medium Impact Utilities and Facilities. 2.1.1 "The city shall maintain an ongoing citizen involvement program and shall assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process." RESPONSE: The proposal is being heard pursuant to a Type IV review as 2 • • defined in Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.390.060. The procedure includes the following notice requirements, which assures that citizens are provided an opportunity to be involved in the planning process: "2. Notification requirements. Notice of the public hearings for the request shall be given by the Director in the following manner: a. At least ten days prior to the scheduled hearing date, notice shall be sent to: (1) The applicant; (2) Any affected governmental agency; (3) The individual recognized by the affected CIT as the official contact person; and (4) Any person who requests notice in writing and pays a fee established by Council resolution. b. At least ten business days prior to the scheduled public hearing date, notice shall be given in a newspaper of general circulation in the City." Under this ordinance, notice is provided to all citizens of the community affording them an opportunity to be heard for or against the proposal. 2.1.2 "The opportunities for citizen involvement provided by the City shall be appropriate to the scale of the planning effort and shall involve a broad cross-section of the community: a. The citizen involvement teams shall be the primary means for carrying out the program; b. Where appropriate, other involvement techniques will be used; and c. The citizen involvement team facilitators shall serve as the committee for citizen involvement and shall be responsible for evaluating the citizen involvement program and for working with the neighborhood planning organizations in recommending changes in the program. RESPONSE: The scale of the applicant's proposal is extremely modest in comparison to the scope of the development code. Publication of notice of the proposed change in parking requirements affords the citizen involvement teams with ample opportunity to participate in the process. 2.1.3 "The City shall ensure that information on land use planning issues is available in an understandable form for all interested citizens." RESPONSE: The proposed change is extremely simple and straightforward. It requires only a change in the stated parking ratio for religious institutions in Table 18.765.2 from one space per two seats in the main assembly area, to one space per four seats. 3 - • • 12.4.1 "The City shall provide for the location of community facilities in a manner which accords with: a. The applicable policies in this plan; b. The locational criteria applicable to the scale and standards of the use." RESPONSE: Religious institutions are an approved conditional use in every zone, to the best of the applicant's knowledge. They are listed as among "Medium Impact Utilities and Facilities." With respect to existing religious institutions, it appears locational criteria are not applicable by definition, since the facilities have already been sited. With respect to the location of future religious facilities within the community, existing locational criteria for medium impact facilities require them to be sited on collector streets, and access may not be routed through local neighborhood streets. Criterion 2. A (1 ) (a). They may not cause dangerous intersections or traffic congestion. Criterion 2. A. (1 ) (b). They must be within one quarter mile of public transit, and the use must be compatible with surrounding uses, considering scale, character and use. Criteria 2. A. (1) (c) and 2. A. (2) (a). The proposal is consistent with all these goals. The applicant's proposal changes the Code to require less on-site parking. That, in turn, encourages use of mass transit, which is available close to all new religious facilities. Use of transit reduces traffic congestion, consistent with criterion 2. A. (1) (b). Also, because peak usage of religious facilities typically occurs on Sunday mornings, at the time when other traffic is at its weekly minimum, traffic congestion is less of a concern than with other types of medium impact facilities. • Siting future religious facilities along collector streets also reduces the impact of on-street parking associated with use of religious facilities, if any, on surrounding residential neighborhoods. Therefore, the proposal will have little or no impact on residential neighborhood parking congestion near new religious facilities. Proposed code language change to the TDC Finally, the applicant has been asked to include the specific code language change requested to be made. The specific code change proposed is in Table 18.765.2. The column entitled "Minimum," in the row entitled "Religious Institutions" currently reads as follows: "1 .0/2 seats in main assembly area" 4 • • The applicant proposes that this be changed to: "1.0/4 seats in main assembly area" The applicant is not aware of any other changes to the TDC necessary to implement the proposed change. • 5 �• • — a 1A ek ; V Attachment # 1 Tigard's Minimum Parking Requirement for Churches Violates Federal Law. The reason that churches are entitled to occupancy of one parking space per 3.33 seats even though Table 18.765.2 calls for a minimum of 1.0 spaces per 2 seats in the main assembly area of a religious institution is that Tigard's parking requirement for churches violates federal law in this instance. The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 ("RLUIPA"), Public Law No. 106-274, codified at 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc makes it illegal for a city to enact or enforce an off street parking requirement (or other land use regulation) that treats religious institutions less favorably than other types of institutions. A copy of RLUIPA is attached. In this case, Tigard's parking requirement limits religious institutions having a fixed number of parking spaces to a lower maximum occupancy than it permits similar non-religious assemblies or institutions with the same number of parking spaces. That discrimination is illegal under RLUIPA. RLUIPA was enacted unanimously by both houses of Congress and signed into law on September 22, 2000, in response to widespread discrimination against religious institutions by many zoning and landmark boards. The extent of the discrimination is documented in the congressional hearings leading to the passage of RLUIPA. Some of the legislative history, including a listing of land use problems encountered by religious groups, is found at www.rluipa.com. Thus, RLUIPA is intended to eliminate discrimination against religious institutions in the enactment and application of all land use regulations, such as the discrimination contained in Tigard's parking code. Section 2 (b) of RLUIPA says: (b) Discrimination and Exclusion. — (1) Equal Terms. — No government shall impose or implement a land use regulation in a manner that treats a religious assembly or institution on less than equal terms with a nonreligious assembly or institution. (2) Nondiscrimination. — No government shall impose or implement a land use regulation that discriminates against any assembly or institution on the basis of religion or religious denomination. Table 18.765.2 violates both subsections (1) and (2) by requiring more parking of religious institutions and assemblies than it requires of other institutions. Of all types of institutions where the parking requirements are stated in terms of the number of parking spaces per seat in the main assembly area, only religious institutions are subjected to the high ratio of one parking space per two seats in the assembly area. Indoor theaters and adult entertainment establishments ("theaters") are the other two types of institutions where Tigard establishes the parking requirement by reference to the assembly area seating capacity. In both instances, Table 18.765.2 lists the minimum parking as one place per 3.0 seats, fully one third less than churches. Stated the other way around, for facilities with the same number of parking spaces, Tigard permits indoor • • 2 theaters fully one half more seats than it allows church sanctuaries. That is patent discrimination against religious institutions that violates RLUIPA on its face. Churches are entitled to the equivalent parking requirement as would apply if it was a theater. Tigard's Minimum Parking Requirements for Theaters Violates Metro Requirements. A parking requirement of 3.33 seats per parking space is proposed to be used to calculate maximum occupancy because that is actually the most parking Tigard may require of indoor theaters under the Metro Code. Tigard's requirement of no more than 3.0 seats per space for theaters violates Metro law. A copy of the relevant portions of the Metro code are attached. The applicable provision of the Metro Code is Title 2, Regional Parking Policy, Section 3.07.220 "Performance Standard," which says in subsection A. 1., "Cities and counties shall require no more parking than the minimum as shown on Table 3.07-2, Regional Parking Ratios . . . ." Table 3.07-2 states the maximum parking that may be required of indoor theaters is 0:3 parking spaces per 1.0 seat. Tigard's Table 18.765.2 expresses the minimum requirement for theaters as 1.0 space per 3.0 seats, and that table's footnotes indicate that is a "Metro requirement." Regrettably, someone at Tigard did the math wrong when they created Table 18.765.2. Three tenths of one parking space per seat is equal to one parking space per 3.33 seats, not one space per 3.0 seats, as Tigard enacted. Tigard is out of compliance with Metro's mandatory requirements as to theaters, so it cannot enforce the requirement it enacted. Complying with RLUIPA by Treating Churches the Same as Theaters Does not Conflict with Metro's Parking Requirements. Examination of Tigard's parking requirements generally reveals that with only one single exception Tigard has adopted as its minimum parking requirement the most parking that Metro law allows it to require. Table 18.765.2's footnote indicating that certain institutions' minimum requirements (including religious institutions) are "Metro Requirement" is simply wrong. The Metro Code does not require any minimum parking at all. All metro's guidelines state with respect to parking requirements for churches is that a city may not require a minimum number of spaces greater than one for each two seats, and a city may not allow a maximum number of spaces to be built greater than one for each 1.7 seats (in Zone A). Thus, a minimum parking requirement of more than 1 It is important not to confuse the maximum parking amount a city may require with the maximum amount of parking it may allow. The former is labeled"Minimum Parking Requirements" on Table 3.02-2, the latter is shown in the other two columns of that table. • • • 3 two seats per space is entirely permissible under Metro guidelines, and there is no conflict between the guidelines and RLUIPA. In fact, according to the statements of Metro's general counsel Dan Cooper in a telephone discussion with the church's general counsel Kelly Ford on February 15, 2001, Metro has no minimum parking requirements for churches or other institutions; it would be content if a municipality allowed a church to build with no parking lot at all —thereby requiring people to walk or take the bus. That opinion is consistent with the plain reading of Metro Code Section 3.07.220 A. 1., quoted above. Of course, even if Metro took the position that cities must require something that RLUIPA forbids, there is no doubt how that conflict would be resolved — The Supremacy Clause in Article VI of the US Constitution requires local law to give way to federal law. Conclusion. In summary, to comply with Metro's requirements, the city may not require more than one parking space per 3.33 seats for theaters, and to comply with RLUIPA it may not treat religious institutions any less favorably than theaters. Therefore, Churches should be permitted a parking ratio of 3.33 seats in their assembly area per parking space in calculating its maximum occupancy. • • CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD TO: Bill Monahan FROM: Jim Hendryx jjliQ� aG DATE: October 18, 2001 SUBJECT: Religious Institution Parking After meeting with staff, reviewing the Community Development Code standards for religious institution parking, and surveying other jurisdictions, staff has concluded that Tigard's standards should be reviewed and modified to a lesser standard. However, a determination to what standard has not been made as of yet. In light of this determination, I am going to refund the application fee submitted by Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries to modify the same. No Council action is necessary. At the same time, assistance in determining appropriate off-street parking ratios will be solicited from local religious institution leaders. Specifically, they will be asked to quantify parking/patronage ratios over a given number of weeks. This information will be used to develop a new standard. Furthermore, a small task force (3-5 members), including neighborhood and religious leaders, should be convened to assist the City in this effort. At most, this task force would meet 2-3 times to review the information and assist in developing new standards. Pending land use applications filed during this period of time would have to be reviewed in light of current standards. However, code provisions exist to modify off-street parking standards through an adjustment process. Minor adjustments to the approved site plan could also be necessary, depending on the status of any application. The time schedule for this amendment would be dependent upon participation of the religious community and schedule of the task force. I would anticipate this may take from 4-6 months to process. - .. '1IP 5. PUBLIC HEARING (LEGISLATIVE) TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW FOR MORE FLEXIBILITY PERTAINING TO PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND JOINT PARKING THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF TIGARD — (ZOA2001-00003) REQUEST: A request to review and amend the Religious Institution parking requirements within the Tigard Community Development Code to allow for more flexibility. The request revolves around the required seating that is currently imposed on the development of Religious Institutions within the City of Tigard. The current proposal involves three components: • Changing the requirement from one space for every two seats, to one space for every 3-4 seats; • Allowing shared parking to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses; • Allowing some on-street parking to occur where streets are designed and physically improved to accommodate such parking. LOCATION: Citywide. ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2 and 2.1.3; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765. a. Mayor Griffith opened the public hearing. b. Community Development Director introduced this agenda item and Associate Planner Kilby presented the staff report. c. Public Testimony • Father Leslie Sieg, 13665 SW Fern Street, Tigard, advised he is pastor of St. Anthony's Church. Fr. Sieg spoke in favor of the proposed amendments advising this was a good compromise for those who had been concerned about the present requirements. He noted that if the amendments were approved, there would be less pavement required and churches would not have to buy as much property for parking. • Kelly Ford, 13975 SW 27th Street, Beaverton, advised he is an attorney for Westgate Baptist Church. He referred to a study conducted by this church, which indicated the ratio of parking needed was not as great as what was currently being required by Tigard's code. He thanked the staff for their hard work on the proposed amendments and agreed that these amendments were a good compromise. • Jack Polans, 16000 SW Queen Victoria, King City, also spoke in favor of the proposed amendments unless the Police Department or Tualatin Valley Fire 8z Rescue objects. Associate Planner Kilby confirmed that COUNCIL MINUTES — MARCH 12, 2002 page 4 all City departments and area agencies had reviewed the proposed amendments and had opportunity to comment. d. Mayor Griffith closed the public hearing. e. Associate Planner Kilby advised that staff recommended approval of the proposed amendments. f. The matter was discussed briefly by Council. All Council members indicated support of the proposed amendments, with the exception of Councilor Dirksen. Councilor Dirksen advised he would not vote on this matter since his church was considering expansion and he also lived near to a church property. g. Motion by Councilor Patton, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to adopt Ordinance No. 02-13. ORDINANCE NO. 02-13 — AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LANGUAGE OF THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW FOR MORE FLEXIBILITY PERTAINING TO PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND JOINT PARKING THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF TIGARD. The motion was approved by a majority vote of Council present: Mayor Griffith - Yes Councilor Dirksen - Abstained Councilor Moore - Yes Councilor Patton - Yes Councilor Scheckla - Yes 6. PUBLIC HEARING (INFORMATIONAL) TO CONSIDER ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT NO. 21 - ERROL AND FONNER STREETS a. Mayor Griffith opened the public hearing. b. Project Engineer Greg Berry presented the staff report, which is on file in the City Recorder's office. c. Public Testimony • Tim Brandon, 12555 SW 112th, Tigard, commented that he thinks he understands the function of the reimbursement district. He advised he did not anticipate hooking up to the sewer right away. d. Mayor Griffith closed the public hearing. d. Project Engineer Berry recommended approval of the proposed resolution. e. Council members discussed the project briefly and indicated their support of the proposal brought forward by staff. g. Motion by Councilor Dirksen, seconded by Councilor Patton, to adopt Resolution No. 02-17 COUNCIL MINUTES — MARCH 12, 2002 page 5 Zol 000 i-ooce 3 i St_ Anthon .j Catholic Church -:- 9905 S.W. McKenzie Street Tigard, Oregon 97223-5198 March 13, 2002 RECD MqR 1 s 2002 James Hendryx Director of Community Development City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Jim, I am writing to thank you and your staff for all of the assistance that you provided in developing the ordinance amending the development code to allow for more flexibility in parking requirements for churches. In particular I would want to commend your associate, Brad Kilby. Brad certainly handled this matter in a very professional fashion and seemed to go beyond the call of duty in his attempt to research his findings. So often folks have the feeling that it is impossible to move city hall. This is but another good example of local government working and working well for the benefit of the community. Please relay by gratitude to Brad and to Dick Bewersdorff for their help. And, a final word of appreciation for the return of the application fee. Every little bit helps. Sincerely, Rev. Leslie M. Sieg Pastor • Telephone (503) 639-4179 E-Mail: LSieg @stanthonytigard.org Fax (503) 624-2364 Form 2 • • DLCD NOTICE OF ADOPTION his fo m must be mailed to DLCD within 5 working days after the final deci ..n C:9 O per ORS 197.610 and OAR Chapter 660- Division 18 (See reverse side for submittal requirements) O Jurisdiction: City of Tigard Local File No.: Z 2001-00003 (If no number,use none) Date of Adoption: March 12, 2002 Date Mailed: March 13, 2002 (Must be filled in) (Date mailed or sent to DLCD) Date this proposal was sent or mailed: December 21, 2001 (45 days) (Date mailed or sent to DLCD) Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment _ Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment X Land Use Regulation Amendment _ Zoning Map Amendment New Land Use Regulation _ Other: (Please Specify Type of Action) Summarize the adopted amendment. Do not use technical terms. Do not write "See Attached." A Zone Ordinance Amendment amending the Religious Institution parking requirements and the requirements for shared parking for all uses within the City of Tigard. The new regulations are as follows: ► Religious Institutions must provide one parking space for every three seats in the main assembly area as opposed to the previously imposed one parking space for every two seats in the main assembly area. ► For added flexibility, the religious institution may provide one space for every four seats in the main assembly area on the site as long as they provide staff with a parking plan that illustrates compliance with one space for every three seats utilizing adjustments,joint parking agreements, or on-street parking as outlined below. ► Joint parking is allowed to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses as opposed to the current standard of 200 feet from the building for residential and 300 feet from the building for commercial and industrial uses. ► Religious Institutions may count on-street parking where streets are designed and improved to accommodate such parking. Describe how the adopted amendment differs from the proposed amendment. If it is the same, write "Same." If you did not give notice for the proposed amendment, write "N/A." Same as previous. Plan Map Change from: N/A to N/A Zone Map Change from: N/A to N/A Location: Citywide Acres Involved: N/A Specify Density: Previous: N/A New: N/A Applicable Statewide Planning Goals: 1 and 2. Was an Exception adopted? Yes: _ No: X DLCD File No.: Form 2 • • Did.the Department of Land Conservation and Development receive a Notice of?Proposed s E " :'`Amendment FORTY FIVE (45) days prior to the first evidentiary hearing? Yes: If no, r o tl1e.;Statewide Planning Goals apply. -7/. f io:/_ i If no did Tp,e Emergency Circumstances Require immediate adoption. Yes: _ No: .:2 Affected State or Federal Agencies, Local Governments or Special Districts: DLCD, Metro, ODOT and the City of Tigard. Local Contact: Brad Kilby Area Code + Phone Number: 503-639-4171 Address: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard City: Tigard, Oregon Zip Code + 4: 97223-8189 ADOPTION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS This form must be mailed to DLCD within 5 working days after the final decision per ORS 197.610 and OAR Chapter 660-Division 18 1. Send this Form and Two (2) Copies of the Adopted Amendment to: ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 635 CAPITAL STREET NE, SUITE 150 SALEM, OREGON 97301-2540 COPY TO: Metro Land Use & Planning ODOT—Region 1, District 2-A 600 NE Grand Avenue Jane Estes,Permit Specialist Portland, OR 97232-2736 5440 SW Westgate Drive, Suite 3 Portland, OR 97221-2414 2. Submit Two (2) copies of adopted material, if copies are bounded please submit two (2) complete copies of documents and maps. 3. Please Note: Adopted materials must be sent to DLCD not later than five (5) working days following the date of the final decision on the amendment. 4. Submittal of this Notice of Adoption must include the text of the amendment plus adopted findings and supplementary information. 5. The deadline to appeal will be extended if you do not submit this Notice of Adoption within five working days of the final decision. Appeals to LUBA may be filed within TWENTY-ONE (21) days of the date, the "Notice of Adoption" is sent to DLCD. 6. In addition to sending the "Notice of Adoption" to DLCD, you must notify persons who participated in the local hearing and requested notice of the final decision. 7. Need More Copies? You can copy this form to 8-1/2x11 green paper only ; or call the DLCD Office at (503) 373-0050; or Fax your request to: (503) 378-5518; or Email your request to Larry.French(o�state.or.us —ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST. CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON ORDINANCE NO.02- 13 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LANGUAGE OF THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ' . CODE TO ALLOW FOR MORE FLEXIBILITY PERTAINING TO PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND JOINT PARKING THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF TIGARD. WHEREAS, the applicant requested a Zone Ordinance Amendment to adjust the parking requirements for religious institutions in all zones, to amend the maximum distance for shared parking in all zones, and to allow on-street parking for religious institutions in instances where the street is designed and improved to accommodate on-street parking;and WHEREAS,the City of Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 4, 2002 and reccommended approval of the proposed amendment by motion and a vote of 6 in favor, 1 against,and 1 abstention. WHEREAS, the City Council held a Public Hearing on the request on March 12, 2002 and indicated they were supportive of the proposed zone change and directed staff to prepare langauge and an Ordinance for Council review and approval;and WHEREAS, the City Council determined that the proposed language adequately addressed concerns regarding protecting both the residential neighborhoods, as well as,the interests of the Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries;and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable; any applicable Metro regulations; any applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies; and any applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances;and WHEREAS, the City Council has found the following to be the only applicable review criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, and 2.1.3;The Metro 2040 Plan; and Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2; and WHEREAS,the City Council has determined that the proposed zone ordinance amendment is consistent with the applicable review criteria and that approving the request would be.in the best interest of the City of Tigard. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The specific text amendements attached as "EXHIBIT A" to this Ordinance are hereby adopted and approved by the City Council. SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor,and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By tYl OC�� j t fivote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only,this 1d - day of Ina,r-k- ,2002. -( /- QAeis_ Gti Catherine Wheatley, City Ci Recorder • ORDINANCE NO. 02- /3 Page 1 of 2 • APPROVED: By Tigard City ty Council this/ — da y of ,2002. i►ii-'Ifi' mes E. G fith, oved as to form: j Attorney 1,Z- ( 01 Date ORDINANCE NO. 02- /3 Page 2 of 2 • • EXHIBIT A-1 • ADDITIONS: Indicated by IJDERL NI E DELETIONS: Indicated by (Additionally,a bar in the far right margin also indicates where a change has been made. Example:—÷ I ) Religious Institution Parking Amendment Proposals 18.765.030 General Provisions B. Location of vehicle parking. The location of off-street parking will be as follows: 1. Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling(s); 2. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 `5.0_0.feet from the I:propeIV ne that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line rIong1h�e n o M __ect, publ c(y a essible ped:estvian-route from the building r.property line with the following exceptions: • a. Commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 5e feet from the primary site; b. The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: • 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. C. Joint parking. Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1. The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the • • • • number of vehicle parking spaces required by the Iarger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3. If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. 18.765.70 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements D. Exclusions to minimum vehicle parking requirements. The following shall not be counted towards the computation of the minimum parking spaces as required in Section 18.765.070H: 1. On-street parking. Parking spaces in the public street or alley shall not be eligible as fulfilling any part of the parking requirement; •xeeat` Nadal on s r<eet1 B arktng tai-®5 nd t. - perimeter b theus pro i edtha; t o low ng;irtteria Mi«be rtsatisftdd` a: TFhe o ith reeti-arki g l 5n a .sfreet that s designecJ aR p y_sit5all: improve to. accommodate��pariking within t; rig off: ay ,� �.e��s°r;�• ��.... . - �.�'��."' g� ,gyp p€4 .- 6� <a,. �z�a� .°�+-�°°, ° TtWiri:.eMraf `re on street arkin <IS ro ose®'is of loeated on focal residaenalsfreets Table 18.765.2 Minimum and Maximum Required Off-street Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Requirements • MINIMUM Religious Institutions 1.0/2 3tsj seats in main assembly area (M) _u .; .. a.r...wasr`a5a �r.:3r.`r :v:x�.s.. :.. s' . ,tgir w., . fo l`Religious4institutlons�may�provide�:frspace�far�-veGy:.4afs.-on�sife-ir}zi�re-criaia asseni6y:ceaprondet #hatt e';:stlag rr rcitwviii h a paii rriki ptan-.tfiattdemonstr tes<t�i iii a aik�aiem n�"a spac elii 24ret�:>�'�Le+yK—.ews s,z.:r•.:•a=.a"Yta�°.�i`.+�-z'�<;.:Ye'-aS,.-n.,;^zY.rF Zy^PS' ^z:. 15�T%'T°:Y�m. eF.v::•^s::Y.t+,r ,` ,:+- �h':x .�<° e re►y T afs erifi t�.uttlriide afro mbinatrealltae af£erna6vesrmecntiMalirafth�c life eAntmeri' a the:.minimums parkin of:1,-space>for every 3 seat`s;.m eKranted pe gplica •le prro lions` the co•e 1r<':a i eyro...xrosc.}'al::.-e:�,v+.r^_a•iZat.rs., mazinlit=roi�:+tSg�r ti ,�-WIEs r8.vterfT•_- ilfit e�ayax^ s`�iat�adt��ecreasecthe.amounto>requ�Fed�-on-5ateiparkinq�totress�tfiari�`space��fo�,evecy 4�se "s�luntess�tFie aini iffiiv va iae offal adiustmeats gral Fesuf n a diusted renm eme f ot=?l M tha 1 paceYf8M .4aseats::1 • • rU.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) urI D, l, F F `k A U S E co 0-' Postage $ m �j O' Certified Fee (/ 1--1 Return Receipt Fee �/J Postmark 4 -711111 D (Endorsement Required) //��.JJ/�� Here Restricted Delivery Fee rr (Endorsement Required)I • ( 3)) D Total Postage&Fees 'ATTN: PLAN AM �`�++�_ SPECIALIST o Oregon Dept. of Land Conservation & Development D -635 Capital Street NE, Suite 150 r` Salem, OR 97301-2540 PS Form 3800,January 2001 See Reverse for Instructions SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY r� I j • Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Received by(Please Print Clearly) B. Date of Delivery item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. 5 Spy - /'I--o Z_ • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. C. Signature • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, X 4L- / ❑Agent or on the front if space permits. s '_ -✓- ❑Addressee ,D delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes 1. Article Addressed to: -= If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑ No ATTN: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST Oregon Dept. of Land Conservation & Deve • 635 Capital Street NE, Suite 150 Salem, OR 97301-2540 3. Service Type I _ 1 .Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes 2. Article Number(Copy from service label) — 7001 1140 0001 9398 2055 PS Form 3811,July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-00-M-0952 1. • • • U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) cO !° FFIC11AL USE '' co Postage $ lu 117 Certified Fe: ►O��l 9�J E Postmark rl Return Receipt F:!( I ce.b Here ° (Endorsement Requi.15116 ° 2002 ° Restricted Delivery Fe (Endorsement Require. j$,' ° Total Postage&Fees ���1 � C ▪ Sent To Metro ATTN: LAND USE & PLANNING' rR Street,Apt.No.; O or PO Box No. 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland, OR 97232-2736 r_ City,State,ZIP+4 PS Form 3800 Ja . e' ee •everse for Instructions SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY • Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Received by(Please Print Clearly) B. Date of Delivery item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ��� Gt1or TI_) §lf�R Il 4 • Print your name and address on the reverse C. natu ��r 77 so that we can return the card to you. t • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, X i ti ��LJ y AgeAgenessee or on the front if space permits. /Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes 1. Article Addressed to: If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑ No ■ Metro 'ATTN: LAND USE & PLANNING 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland; OR 97232-2736 3. Service Type Apertified Mail ❑ Express Mail 4 _ ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise �1! ❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(ExtraFee) ❑Yes j,j 2. Article Number(Copy from service label) l 7001 1140 0001 9398 2048 PS Form 3811,July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-00-M-0952 i ( • • • U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) Postage $ �C•- r" �� �Op CD Certified Fee D ,-4 Return Receipt Receipt Fee /3. -�- Cc, , Postmark (Endorsement Required) IIIII� C ► Here Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) ED Total Postage&Fees $ C,(/ �l• ' Sent To ODOT— Region 1, District 2-A ,-R Street,Apt.No., Jane Estes, Permit Specialist 0 or PO Box No.I 5440 SW Westgate Drive, Suite 350 City,State,ZIP, Portland, OR 97221-2414 PS Form 3800,January 2001 See Reverse for Instructions • SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY • Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Received by(Please Print Clearly) B. Date of Delivery item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse C. Signature so that we can return the card to you. / ❑Agent • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. X e°_ // ❑Addressee I D. Iscelivey address different from item 1? ❑ Yes 1. Article Addressed to: n f7ES,enter delivery address below: ❑ No ODOT— Region 1, District 2-A ';;1 l • Jane Estes, Permit Specialist • 5440 SW Westgate Drive, Suite 350 . Portland, OR 97221-2414 3. Service Type.. - Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail --- ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes 2. Article Number(Copy from service label) 7001 1140 0001 9398 2062 PS Form 3811,July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-00-M-0952 1 • w 120 DAYS = N/A CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL Case Number: ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT(ZOA) 2001-00003 Case Name: RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE PARKING AMENDMENT Names of Owners: N/A Name of Applicant: Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries Address of Applicant: 9905 SW McKenzie Street Tigard, OR 97223 Address of Property: Citywide - Tax Map/Lot Nos.: N/A A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT(ORDINANCE NO.02-13). THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL HAVE REVIEWED THE APPLICANT'S PLANS, NARRATIVE, MATERIALS, COMMENTS OF REVIEWING AGENCIES, THE PLANNING DIVISION'S STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON FEBRUARY 4, 2002 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE REQUEST. THE CITY COUNCIL ALSO HELD A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON MARCH 12, 2002 PRIOR TO MAKING A DECISION ON THE REQUEST. THIS DECISION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. Request: > A Zone Ordinance Amendment amending the Religious Institution parking requirements and the requirements for shared parking for all uses within the City of Tigard. The new regulations are as follows: ► Religious Institutions must provide one parking space for every three seats in the main assembly area as opposed to the previously imposed one parking space for every two seats in the main assembly area. / For added flexibility, the religious institution may provide one space for every four seats in the main assembly area on the site as long as they provide staff with a parking plan that illustrates compliance with one space for every three seats utilizing adjustments,joint parking agreements, or on-street parking as outlined below. ► Joint parking is allowed to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses as opposed to the current standard of 200 feet from the building for residential and 300 feet from the building for commercial and industrial uses. / Religious Institutions may count on-street parking where streets are designed and improved to accommodate such parking. Zone: N/A. Applicable Review Criteria: Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2 and 2.1.3; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765. Action: ➢ ® Approved ❑ Approved with Conditions ❑ Denied Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: ® Affected Government Agencies ® The Affected Citizen Involvement Team Final Decision: THIS IS THE FINAL DECISION OF THE CITY AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON APRIL 11,:2002. All supporting documents relied upon to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. Copies of these items can also be obtained at a cost of$.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Appeal: A review of this decision may be obtained by filing a notice of intent with the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) according to their procedures. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division or the City Recorder at (503) 639-4171. • • CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON ORDINANCE NO.02- 1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LANGUAGE OF THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT . CODE TO ALLOW FOR MORE FLEXIBILITY PERTAINING TO PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND JOINT PARKING THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF TIGARD. WHEREAS,the applicant requested a Zone Ordinance Amendment to adjust the parking requirements for religious institutions in all zones, to amend the maximum distance for shared parking in all zones, and to allow on-street • parking for religious institutions in instances where the street is designed and improved to accommodate on-street parking;and WHEREAS,the City of Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 4, 2002 and reccommended approval of the proposed amendment by motion and a vote of 6 in favor, 1 against,and 1 abstention. WHEREAS, the City Council held a Public Hearing on the request on March 12, 2002 and indicated they were supportive of the proposed zone change and directed staff to prepare langauge and an Ordinance for Council review and approval;and WHEREAS, the City Council determined that the proposed language adequately addressed concerns regarding protecting both the residential neighborhoods,as well as,the interests of the Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable; any applicable Metro regulations; any applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies; and any applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Council has found the following to be the only applicable review criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, and 2.1.3;The Metro 2040 Plan; and Statewide Planning Goals land 2; and WHEREAS,the City Council has determined that the proposed zone ordinance amendment is consistent with the applicable review criteria and that approving the request would be in the best interest of the City of Tigard. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The specific text amendements attached as "EXHIBIT A" to this Ordinance are hereby adopted and approved by the City Council. SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor,and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By 11(1 Ors}y vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title oay, this 1r) -ell day of ` ',Ct,t e ,2002. -- 601-P- Catherine Wheatley, City Ci Recorder ORDINANCE NO. 02- /3 Page 1 of 2 • • APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this 1„�-12-ilday of ,2002. �/ mes E. G fith,W{y Ap oved as to form: ' I Attorney _) \k` ( 0 -2- Date ORDINANCE NO. 02- 13 Page 2 of 2 • • EXHIBIT A-1 ADDITIONS: Indicated by UNDERii NE DELETIONS: Indicated by (Additionally,a bar in the far right margin also indicates where a change has been made. Example:- I ) Religious Institution Parking Amendment Proposals 18.765.030 General Provisions B. Location of vehicle parking. The location of off-street parking will be as follows: 1. Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling(s); 2. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 :5.D:0 � feet from the b ' pr�.prtiViln that they are required to serve, measured in a straight lino salon_ gfherno=st iect, j5,b tclv =ccessiblep destrfan 'oite from the gprope.=§y;lir:te with the following exceptions: a. Commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 5.00 feet from the primary site; b. The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. C. Joint parking. Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels. of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1. The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the • ' • number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; • 3. If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses • change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. 18.765.70 Minimum and Maximum,Off-Street Parking Requirements • D. Exclusions to minimum vehicle parking requirements. The following shall not be counted towards the computation of the minimum parking spaces as required in Section 18.765.070H: 1. On-street parking. Parking spaces in the public street or alley shall not be eligible as fulfilling any part of the parking requirement; pxce ti • 6` A4'�;n:-"-pt�+'�., -`s+`. �.- ..� .. � ,yy. _.- k.:-BPS- iFer-'.' 2�'+'�.,.LS•' eltgtous 1 s twt s may�o nt on street�par Ctng aroun a tliaci rime er o f thetuseTpr. vJd.edkthat- . e o owing criteria ave been sa1tsfied ep Shatbil. ceet parka iOs_ ilffi eet thiat "s ti es geed nd_®hysiea tI:` tr' oRue aceornr Coda a ark with _the-ri-'#t7of.=wa 4 • b`: Theistreet:wherE on stx:.eet .a'rkl.... proposecre fiot located on lo`caf resident al streets. Table 18.765.2 Minimum and Maximum Required Off-street Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Requirements MINIMUM Religious Institutions 1.0/2 Ri seats in main assembly area (M) :ari !lligN'�EP-�3• -? B'e..R °o e -a---.:�:,�d ,0..,frx,,'erTjY - ..i•} .ax w.` cr.v%:5a`tFi }'61iRetgious,�r�stitutions�mav�provicie�1y�st�aceor�every..4.�sea�'s.ori sif'e;=�r�.tfiermatn:�assemtily'.fea..:aro�ideci that they upp"v meeCitty wittz akiiikinq ptan that`dea onstrates=:that-ttineak1parkina del and ofZ p ceTor`: 3:rfla�s�--•=�}-rcw..s.�s_ +=c-'.:�:�:�->:--��w.a>x&�r,+�.cw=.:,�a.�,�>•,�--.v:-.,.�^.a�:-,n.;:�;:.. �:esi-:z-;:.;--,�.c-.•6s=.3.;- s��> �v.:.a.-^«�.�.°"r..a.--�7 .ver3y 3;seats°isrmefrall rirr e a i eombinairti �of i e alternatives mentioned.iiiiih allfa a Iiustments;to ^:sax,.=•9„^v� r.��. ;;mA1,;�r- •-?= a=vmn.�sry''"' '.�=ca'°-':, s;�^. � a� .Uts_;r°-:�.. a , SSCr:^:: "a•c..r..:psi. xy.°r-='^.:.�7xr. •..rs'*- �e rrainrmum>paiiTaof 1:space=-for eve q eatstmaaeieranteaNTApplreR provrs[onsrofatheseod�e atiu Ural l nofiecueas t m MTh'g.i I V°M i a l o te;v e ry g g a s r dil l Ofie ' naulati ie Wa i a of at'I diarrt ene p ante ies ialii an adrusted a if irement o€'fe ;ttaah 1 'Space#or''t evem • • • • • KTIG`ARD CITY.:000NCIL �;�� �NN+�p �lj�l'��c �MEETING -7 4,, �� ...,.,., � ��� CITY OF TIGARD MARCH 1�2 `20,0,kk 6,30 p m CITOREGON - k ' . TIGARD CITY9HALL " “<_= :1311, 5 SW.�HALL BLVD 44:04-4 �:.--:�� �3,TI�GA.RD�=®.R 9x7223}, r PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15-p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171, x309 (voice) or 503-684- 2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for.the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA COUNCIL AGENDA — MARCH 12, 2002 page 1 IP • AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 12, 2002 6:30 PM • STUDY SESSION > DISCUSSION AND REVIEW OF COMMUNITY EVENTS FUNDING REQUESTS > DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS FOR COOK PARK CONCESSIONS • EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(3), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 7:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council St Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications 81 Liaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please) • Tigard High School Student Envoy Nathan Leamy 3. PROCLAMATIONS: a. National Community Development Week, April 1 —7, 2002 b. Declaring Tigard High School Marching Band and Tigerette Dance Team as the Official City of Tigard Ambassadors to New York City COUNCIL AGENDA — MARCH 12, 2002 page 2 • • 4. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 4.1 Approve Council Minutes for October 15, 2001 and January 14 and 15, 2002 4.2 Receive and File: a. Council Calendar b. Tentative Agenda 4.3 Revise Resolution No. 00-08, Citywide Personnel Policies, Updating Family and Medical Leave Article No. 55-0 — Resolution No. 02 - 4.4 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Sign a Dedication Deed Dedicating Additional Rights-of-Way at SW North Dakota Street and SW 115t Avenue, SW Walnut Street and SW Tiedeman Street, and SW Gaarde Street — Resolution No. 02 - 4.5 Adopt a Resolution Approving Year Twelve of the Washington County Wasteshed Waste Reduction Plan and to Adopt an Intergovernmental Agreement with Washington County — Resolution No. 02 - 4.6 Local Contract Review Board a. Award Engineering Services Contracts to Westlake Consultants for 121' Avenue and to CESNW Consultants for Walnut Street Improvements • Consent Agenda - Items Removed for Separate Discussion: Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 5. PUBLIC HEARING (LEGISLATIVE) TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW FOR MORE FLEXIBILITY PERTAINING TO PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND JOINT PARKING THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF TIGARD — (ZOA2001-00003) REQUEST: A request to review and amend the Religious Institution parking requirements within the Tigard Community Development Code to allow for more flexibility. The request revolves around the required seating that is currently imposed on the development of Religious Institutions within the City of Tigard. The current proposal involves three components: COUNCIL AGENDA — MARCH 12, 2002 page 3 • • • Changing the requirement from one space for every two seats, to one space for every 3-4 seats; • Allowing shared parking to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses; • Allowing some on-street parking to occur where streets are designed and physically improved to accommodate such parking. LOCATION: Citywide. ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1 .2 and 2.1 .3; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765. a. Open Public Hearing b. Staff Report: Community Development Department c. Public Testimony d. Staff Recommendation e. Council Discussion f. Close Public Hearing g. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 02 — 6. PUBLIC HEARING (INFORMATIONAL) TO CONSIDER ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT NO. 21 - ERROL AND FONNER STREETS a. Open Public Hearing b. Summation by Engineering Department c. Public Testimony d. Staff Recommendation e. Council Discussion f. Close Public Hearing g. Consideration by Council: Resolution No. 02 - 7. PUBLIC HEARING (INFORMATIONAL) TO CONSIDER ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT NO. 22 - HOWARD DRIVE a. Open Public Hearing b. Summation by Engineering Department c. Public Testimony d. Staff Recommendation e. Council Discussion f. Close Public Hearing g. Consideration by Council: Resolution No. 02 - COUNCIL AGENDA — MARCH 12, 2002 page 4 • 8. UPDATE ON COOK PARK MASTER PLAN EXPANSION PHASE II a. Staff Report: Public Works Staff b. Council Discussion 9. DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS TO PAY ADDITIONAL CITY COSTS FOR THE 69Th AVENUE LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (LID) a. Staff Report: Engineering Staff b. Council Discussion c. Council Direction: Which funding option should staff pursue to cover the additional costs associated with the 69' Avenue LID? 10. CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10.28 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO PARKING a. Staff Report: Engineering Staff b. Council Discussion c. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 02 - 11. COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS REGARDING MUR-2 ZONING ISSUES RAISED DURING THE WASHINGTON SQUARE REGIONAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PUBLIC HEARING 12. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS 13. NON AGENDA ITEMS 14. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(3), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 15. ADJOURNMENT I:\ADM\CATHY\CCA\020312P.DOC COUNCIL AGENDA — MARCH 12, 2002 page 5 • r AGENDA ITEM# 5 FOR AGENDA OF March 12, 2002 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Religious Institute&Joint Parking Zone Ordinance Amendment (ZOA2001-00003) PREPARED BY: Brad Kilby DEPT HEAD OK A .1. //� ITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Should the Council approve a requested Zone Ordinance Amendment to amend the joint parking and religious institution parking requirements? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approving the requested Zone Ordinance Amendment as amended by motion by the City of Tigard Planning Commission. INFORMATION SUMMARY The Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries initiated a request to City staff and the City Council. As a result, the Community Development Director appointed staff to work with a committee of citizens to review the concerns and recommend solutions. The Committee met once and suggested a few alternatives that have been incorporated into the proposal currently before the City Council. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the request on February 4, 2002. At that meeting, the Commission voted 6 to 1 in favor of the amendment with one abstention. Since this amendment is legislative in nature.and does not further restrict property, the City Attorney has indicated that individual property .owner,notice was not required. Notice procedures in the development code including publication of notice yin the paper, and written notice to the appropriate agencies were met. The proposal makes the following recommendations: • Changing the parking requirement for Religious Institutions from one space for every two seats, to one space for every 3-4 seats in the main sanctuary. (Table 18.765.2) • Allowing joint parking to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses as opposed to the current standard of 200 feet from the building for residential and 300 feet from the building for commercial and industrial uses. [Section 18.765.030(B)] • Allowing some on-street parking to occur where streets are designed and improved to accommodate such parking. Essentially, the amendment allows religious institutions to provide 1 space for every four seats in the main sanctuary on-site if they can show, through a parking plan, that they can meet the 1 space for every three seats in the main sanctuary utilizing a variety of options including adjustments,on-street parking, and joint parking. • • . T Attached as "Attachment 1" is the ordinance adopting the proposal. The Planning Commission recommendation and meeting minutes are attached as "Attachment 2". OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Deny the request or approve it with revisions. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY 1. "Community Character and Quality of Life"-Develop strategies to balance needs of new and infill development with need to provide preservation and protection of open space, natural areas, and other defined aesthetic qualities valued by those who already live and work in Tigard. 2. "Transportation and Traffic"-Improve traffic safety by reducing actual speeds on neighborhood streets. ATTACHMENT LIST Attachment 1: Ordinance adopting the code amendments Exhibit A-1: "Revised"Proposed language Changes Attachment 2: 2/4/02 "Draft"Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. Attachment 3: Staff Report to the Planning Commission(including Exhibits A & B) Attachment 4: Staff follow-up memo regarding Washington County parking standards FISCAL NOTES N/A "ATTACHMENT 1" • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LANGUAGE OF THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW FOR MORE FLEXIBILITY PERTAINING TO PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND JOINT PARKING THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF TIGARD. WHEREAS,the applicant requested a Zone Ordinance Amendment to adjust the parking requirements for religious institutions in all zones, to amend the maximum distance for shared parking in all zones, and to allow on-street parking for religious institutions in instances where the street is designed and improved to accommodate on-street parking;and WHEREAS,the City of Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 4, 2002 and reccommended approval of the proposed amendment by motion and a vote of 6 in favor, 1 against,and 1 abstention. WHEREAS, the City Council held a Public Hearing on the request on March 12, 2002 and indicated they were supportive.of the proposed zone change and directed staff to prepare langauge and an Ordinance for Council review and approval;and WHEREAS, the City Council determined that the proposed language adequately addressed concerns regarding protecting both the residential neighborhoods,as well as,the interests of the Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries;and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable; any applicable Metro regulations; any applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies; and any applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Council has found the following to be the only applicable review criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, and 2.1.3; The Metro 2040 Plan; and Statewide Planning Goals land 2; and WHEREAS,the City Council has determined that the proposed zone ordinance amendment is consistent with the applicable review criteria and that approving the request would be in the best interest of the City of Tigard. NOW, THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The specific text amendements attached as "EXHIBIT A" to this Ordinance are hereby adopted and approved by the City Council. SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only,this day of ,2002. Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder ORDINANCE NO. 02- Page 1 of 2 • • "ATTACHMENT 1" APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of , 2002. James E. Griffith,Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney Date • S ORDINANCE NO. 02- Page 2 of 2 S • EXHIBIT A-1 ADDITIONS: Indicated by UND LRE INE DELETIONS: Indicated by (Additionally,a bar in the far right margin also indicates where a change has been made. Example:--> I ) • Religious Institution Parking Amendment Proposals 18.765.030 General Provisions • B. Location of vehicle parking. The location of off-street parking will be as follows: • 1. Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the • dwelling(s); • 2. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 0d feet from the buildin g-er ase�F?_.ltPiOIme that they are required to serve, measured ire a straight line along tithem tdirect publiclyeaccessibie{=;pedestrian 4oute from the building P e Y line with the following exceptions: • a. Commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 3.00..r000 feet from the primary site; b. The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: • • . 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; • 4) Long-term spaces. C. • Joint parking. Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1. The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the • . r number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3. If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. 18.765.70 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements • D. Exclusions to minimum vehicle parking requirements. The following shall not be counted towards the computation of the minimum parking spaces as required in Section 18.765.070H: 1. On-street parking. Parking spaces in the public street or alley shall not be eligible as fulfilling any part of the parking requirement; except; Religious Institutions•rrmarcount-on-street-,parking aroundAt :e. perimeter of fhe erse provideditha't�the droxi nc rater at ave_'t een satittie i a.a`The:on-street "`arkin "is ion=a street that its designed and hysically I rn'pr vo ed to accommodate park tt4V;iff iri the_;i r taot:way tj _ :T.he sfreet where.on{sfre'et parki'ragals proposed ishnof_'lotated 6n local residential>;streets Table 18.765.2 Minimum and Maximum Required Off-street Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Requirements MINIMUM Religious Institutions 1.0/2 376j seats in main assembly area (M) 61.-Religi6ti 1nstitutionsimay;provide}1�fiebe=for'lever∎i'M seat"s_.'on.'site in:;the`niainsassenatily area:provided �. >, tea.- `1siiacefor het theObobl the>Gity>with'a'pa tc nq plan.that:demonstrates°that°the;peak:garkiriq``demand of eveiv=3"seatsais.met utilizinq;anv"combinat'ion flf heleiternatives-TnentioneiArr'thii aliei t J*iusthi ts-o #`iie`fiiiinimum arking3of.�.sciace=for evenir3 seats*mav°be:grente l per appiiCeble:piovisionsclthe ea-CO Welt:hot decrease'ttie amount 66-666 srte'.paikina fo 1essfthan.17space-.fors_everv::4-:`seats{untee the blimulativel alue'°of all adiustrnents tiranted resuifs'in an'adiu"seed re4uirement of less"ttiaria saaee"for.every • • • • 4 seats: Attachment 2 DRAFT CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes February 4, 2002 1. CALL TO ORDER President Padgett called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The meeting was held in the Tigard Civic Center, Town Hall, at 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: President Padgett; Commissioners Anderson, Bienerth, Buehner, Mores, Munro, Sutton, Webb, and Wolch (alternate) Commissioners Absent: Commissioner Scolar Staff Present: Dick Bewersdorff, Planning Manager; Brad Kilby, Associate Planner; Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner; Jerree Gaynor, Planning Commission Secretary 3. COMMUNICATIONS The joint meeting with City Council on February 19th, will begin at 6:30 p.m. instead of 7:00 p.m. Suggested topics for the meeting have been forwarded to the Council. 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4.1 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA) 2001-00003 RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE PARKING CODE AMENDMENT REQUEST: A request to review and amend the Religious Institution parking requirements within the Tigard Community Development Code to allow for more flexibility. The request revolves around the required seating that is currently imposed on the development of Religious Institutions within the City of Tigard. The current proposal involves three components: 1.) Changing the requirement from one space for every two seats in the main sanctuary to one space for every three to four seats; 2) Allowing shared parking to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses; and 3) Allowing some on-street parking to occur where streets are designed and physically improved to accommodate such parking. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES — February 4,2002 — Page 1 • • DRAFT LOCATION: Citywide. ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2 and 2.1.3; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765. STAFF REPORT Brad Kilby presented the staff report on behalf of the City. This amendment results from a request by the Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries, which advised that the City's parking standards do not conform with the standards of other jurisdictions and requested that the standards be reviewed to accommodate the planned expansion of many religious institutions. Staff was directed to form a committee in conjunction with Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries in order to look into alternatives to the current parking standards. A survey was conducted and it was found that Tigard imposes the strictest parking standards compared with surrounding jurisdictions. One of staffs concerns is not having justification for raising the standards. No other jurisdiction provided its justification for allowing a 1:3-4 ratio of parking spaces per seats. Staff researched the issue through various resources and drafted the proposed amendments to allow a minimum of one parking space for every three seats in the main sanctuary, or one space for every four seats using the adjustments for adjacent on-street parking or a shared parking agreement as set forth in the staff report. Upon inquiry by the Commissioners, staff advised that they are not aware of the Washington County ratio, but believe it is 1-to-2. The average family size in Tigard is 2.48. The memo from Mr. Ford, attached as Exhibit A, provides data on the ratio of. vehicles and people in attendance at Westgate Baptist Church. This data varies among the various religious institutions in Tigard, and the average is approximately 2.5. President Padgett noted that religious institutions are in an overlay Institutional Zone, which is conditionally allowed in all zones. He asked how the parking requirements are calculated for non-religious community institutions such as a community center. Mr. Padgett pointed out that if the use of the religious facility is expanding, then perhaps having a separate religious institution parking requirement is no longer relevant. Staff advised that the calculation is determined by the type of institution/use and most types are specifically addressed in the code. If a certain type of institution is not specifically addressed, it is referred to the director for determination. For example, the requirement for a cultural institution is a minimum of 2.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The requirements are based on square footage and type of use. Mr. Kilby stated that an exhaustive study in Redmond, Washington had been made on this issue and it was determined that the accessory uses did not conflict with the use of the main sanctuary and therefore it was not deemed necessary to address those uses as separate uses. Commissioner Munro asked about ability of the City to determine whether or not the religious institution is meeting the requirements, and President Padgett asked what the remedy would be if a surrounding community disputed that the institution was meeting the requirements. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES — February 4,2002 — Page 2 • • DRAFT Mr. Kilby responded that the determination of whether parking requirements are being met is not complaint-driven by the surrounding community. When an institution is developed or application is made for expansion, a parking study is performed as part of the application process and the requirements are determined at that time. The applicant must follow specific criteria and prove that the requirements are met. Commissioner Buehner commented that expanded uses, such as evening services, may have a different impact on parking than would the usual weekend morning services. She asked if this issue had been looked at. Staff responded that a separate analysis on such an impact had not been performed because traffic and parking requirements are determined by analyzing peak demand, not particular days or times of use. PUBLIC TESTIMONY— IN FAVOR Kelly Ford, 13975 SW 27th St., Beaverton, OR 97008, stated that he represents Westgate Baptist Church and the Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries. Mr. Ford submitted written testimony in favor of the application, attached to these minutes as Exhibit A. Mr. Ford pointed out that the survey attached to his written testimony uses data collected at the church's 11:00 a.m. Sunday service because this is the most intensive use of the church and other accessory uses generate less attendance and parking needs. He also stated that he does not believe information contained in the staff report about the establishment of minimum requirements by Metro is correct. He said that Metro does not set forth any minimum parking requirements; Metro standards provide a maximum amount of parking that the City may require. and a maximum amount of parking that the City may permit. The maximum amount of parking under Metro standards that the City may require is 2-to-1, and the maximum amount it may permit is 1.7-to-1, and the 1998 amendments to the code adopted both of those maximums. It is the applicant's position that the proposed ratio of one space for every three/four seats is reasonable and in line with the ratios allowed for other uses. Father Leslie Sieg, St. Anthony's Parish, 13665 SW Fern St., Tigard, OR 97223, also testified as to the reasonableness and desirability of the proposed parking amendments. He said he does not believe it was the City's intent to impose more restrictive require- ments on religious institutions at the time the code was amended in 1998. The Commission should also be made aware that while parking requirements are based on 100% of the institution's capacity, actual attendance/use rarely exceeds 80%. In other words, peak usage is actually less than the peak capacity on which the requirements are based. He also reiterated that peak usage is only obtained at weekend morning services and all other uses require less parking. PUBLIC TESTIMONY — IN OPPOSITION None PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES — February 4,2002 — Page 3 • • DRAFT PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED The Commissioners agreed that the language set forth on page two of Mr. Ford's letter (Exhibit A) captures the intent of this proposal. Upon inquiry by President Padgett, staff explained the reasoning for the change from 1-to-3.3 to 1-to-3 was due to consideration of what is appropriate for Tigard and the local situation. Commissioner Munro stated that she is in support of the amendment. She is not in favor of large areas of asphalt parking lots based on peak demand but are largely unused. As far as implementing this parking plan, Commissioner Munro would like to see applicants use creative strategies and look at all aspects of their parking needs, such as carpooling, encouraging public transportation, partnering with park & ride, shuttles, etc., as well as being self-policing, in order to minimize impact on the surrounding neighborhood. Commissioner Mores and Commissioner Sutton expressed support- of the recommendation. Commissioner Bienerth said that while she does feel that the current parking requirement is somewhat strict, she does have some concerns about allowing on-street parking for a religious facility. There should be uniformity in the parking code and they should not set a precedent where other uses will use this amendment as a basis for seeking exceptions to the parking code. She supports the amendment in part, but would like to limit the ratio to 1-to-3 ratio without adjustment. President Padgett pointed out that shared parking with adjacent properties is also an adjustment and that on-street parking can be viewed as shared parking. Commissioner Bienerth said she is in favor of shared parking, her objection is only with on-street parking when it impacts surrounding neighbors. She would like staff to consider this issue. Commissioner Anderson commented that on-street parking is only allowed on streets designed to accommodate on-street parking and are approved for that standard. While on-street parking can impede traffic flow, it also serves to slow traffic. Commissioner Sutton noted that on-street parking is required to be adjacent to the facility and is not allowed on local residential classified streets. In addition, a street must be upgraded for on-street parking to be allowed. A brief discussion was held regarding street classifications and what streets are eligible for on-street parking. The intent is to preclude on-street parking on local residential streets, but parking is permitted on local collector and commercial streets. Commissioner Buehner stated she supports the 1-to-3 ratio, but noted that many churches have a larger senior population that commonly only have one person in the car. Her main concern is about on-street parking and its impact on the community. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES — February 4,2002 — Page 4 • • DRAFT Commissioner Webb has no objections to the amendment, but also is concerned about on-street parking. Commissioner Sutton asked what the requirements are to ensure that a street is suitable for allowing on-street parking. Staff responded that an applicant seeking to count on-street parking must present a plan showing that the street meets the requirements for and can accommodate on- street parking. On-street parking is limited to those streets that are not local neighborhood streets. If there is an impact, it can be addressed through the conditional use process. Commissioner Buehner asked if the City has the ability to force a religious institution to address their parking needs if the use expands over time. Staff responded that the City can only require that the facility provide the required number of spaces based on the number of seats in the main sanctuary. President Padgett stated that he is in support of the amendment. He does not feel that what other jurisdictions require should be a consideration here. He supports increasing the ratio to 1-to-4. This amendment does not encourage people to park on neighborhood streets. When an applicant presents a parking plan that counts on-street parking, that applicant will be required to improve the street to meet the standards for accommodating on-street parking. He feels that the concerns expressed above have been addressed. Following discussion, Commissioner Munro moved, based on the findings in the staff report and testimony heard tonight, to recommend to City Council to adopt the proposed amendment, including the amendment to Footnote 6 as follows: "Religious institutions may provide one space for every four seats on site in the main assembly area provided that they supply the City with a parking plan that demonstrates that the peak parking demand of one space for every three seats is met utilizing any combination of the alternatives mentioned in this chapter. Adjustments to the minimum parking of one space for every three seats may be granted per applicable provisions of the Code, but shall not decrease the amount of required on- site parking to less than one space for every four seats unless the cumulative value of all adjustments granted results in an adjusted requirement of less than one space per four seats." Commissioner Mores seconded the motion. A voice vote was taken and the motion passed 6-1: Commissioner Buehner voted no and Commissioner Bienerth abstained. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES — February 4,2002 — Page 5 • .' DRAFT 5. OTHER BUSINESS Morgan Tracy submitted a memorandum regarding planned development ordinance language revisions, attached as Exhibit B to these minutes. He briefly discussed the details set forth in the memorandum. The ordinance revisions address the Commission's concerns related to density bonuses granted for providing open space that is otherwise undevelopable and for trees protected in areas where development would not otherwise be allowed to occur. The Commissioners agreed that the proposed language set forth in the memorandum (Exhibit B) is acceptable. These amendments affect properties Citywide and therefore, under the requirements of Ballot Measure 56 which is now State law, notice must be provided to all property owners at a cost to the City of over $6,000 to mail 16,000 notices. Because of this, the Commission should consider the advisability of delaying these amendments until such time as they can be bundled with other Citywide amendments requiring the mailing of a notice, in order to avoid this separate mailing cost to the City. Another issue to be considered is an amendment to the development code that these changes will not apply to those areas within the Urban Growth Boundary outside the City limits. The City will therefore be dealing with two separate standards until and if Washington County changes its code to apply to that area. Further discussion was held regarding the City of Tigard and Washington County's adoption of these amendments. From a budgetary standpoint, staff recommends that these amendments be bundled with other amendments that require the mailing of notice. Following further discussion, staff was requested to research the issue and provide a recommendation at the next Planning Commission meeting. Planning Commission Secretary advised that the next Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for March 18, beginning at 7:00 p.m. 6. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:53 p.m. Jerree Gaynor, Planning Commission Secretary • ATTEST: President Mark Padgett PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES — February 4,2002 — Page 6 01/28/2002 15:03 5036418757 FORDGREY PAGE 82 KELLY E. FORD,P.C. CO\‘‘Pipt ATTORNEY AT LAW 14355 Southwest Alen Blvd.,Suite 100 Beaverton.Oregon 97005-4404 Facsimile(503)6414757 Telephone(503)641-3044 Email 1(ord law�a te.nu January 28, 2002 To: Tigard Planning Commission From: Kelly Ford Re: Item 4.1 Zone Ordinance Amendment 2001-00003 Religious Institute Parking Code Amendment. Dear Members of the Planning Commission: I am a member of the Citizen Task Force that developed the proposed amendments that are the subject matter of this item. I am also a member of and general counsel to Westgate Baptist Church at 12930 SW Scholls Ferry Road, Tigard, which currently has a conditional use application pending in connection with its development of a new multi-purpose building that will seat 600 for church services. This testimony is offered on behalf of Westgate Baptist Church in favor of the proposed amendment. Westgate agrees with the proposed new ordinance with a single exception. The proposed terminology of footnote six of Table 18.765.2 purports to require parking of not less than one space per three seats in the main assembly area, including 'any combination of the alternatives and adjustments mentioned in this chapter." The "ahcrnatives" referred to arc such things as joint parking agreements. "Adjustments" are provided in the code for such things as development of mass transit improvements on site, and in situations where the applicant proves its vehicle demand is less than the applicable minimum parking standard would require be accommodated. Grant of an adjustment can reduce the minimum required parking below the table minimum. No separate parking standard is `stated in footnote 6 for religious institutions whose applications do not involve adjustments, and that is not the intent of this proposal. Thus, the proposed terminology is unclear at best, and quite possibly,would not permit adjustments to affect the required minimum ratio. That is contrary to the express terms of the adjustment provisions of the codes, which are created for the precise purpose of permitting decreases to the amount of required parking, where applicable. I also believe it is not the intention of any of the Task Force members to create such an inflexible provision. Religious institutions should have the same opportunity-to apply for and receive adjustments to required parking as other uses. Therefore, I ask the Commission to adopt the following language in footnote 6 instead of the language in the staff report: 01/28/2002 15:03 5036418757 FORDGREY PAGE 03 January 28, 2002 Page 2 Footnote 6: "Religious institutions may provide 1 space for every four seats on site in the main assembly area provided that they supply the City with a parking plan that demonstrates that the peak parking demand of 1 space for every 3 seats is met utilizing any combination of the alternatives mentioned in this chapter. Adjustments to the minimum parking of 1 space for every 3 seats may be granted per applicable provisions of the Code, but shall not decrease the amount of required on-site parking to less than 1 space for every four seats unless the cumulative value of all adjustments granted results in an adjusted requirement of less than one space per four seats." For the Commission's information, in light of the existing standard of one space for every two scars and Westgate Baptist Church's need to receive an adjustment to that ratio under existing adjustment procedures, Westgate has conducted a survey of its attendance and vehicle count for its 11:00 a.m. service that shows our average vehicle occupancy has been onc vehicle for each 3.05 persons in attendance. A copy of that report is attached. . . 1 have no reason to believe our ratio is significantly different than other churches. Our average count per car is higher than the average family size cited in the staff materials. Reasons for this include carpooling, which is especially common among seniors, use of TriMet, which stops by the church,some pedestrian traffic, and disproportionately higher church attendance among families with children as opposed to single adults. The existing ratio of one space per two seats in the main assembly area has the effect of blocking any further development of substantial sized churches within the City of Tigard. Design standards require approximately onc acre of land for each 100 parking spaces which, under. the existing code, means one acre of parking for each 200 attendees. To develop an assembly area for 600 attendees such as the Westgate proposal; under the current standard approximately three acres must be devoted to parking. Adding the building itself with an appropriate number of classrooms means that it takes a four acre site to build a medium size church, without any consideration of other uses such as outdoor athletic facilities. There are very few sites remaining within the city that will accommodate that size church, and almost none that will accommodate a larger church. The amendment provided by this proposal before you is desperately needed. Thank you. • • 01/28/2002 15:03 5036418757 FORDGREY PAGE 04 • •: WESTGATE BAPTIST CHURCH 12930 SW Scholls Ferry Road, Tigard, OR 97223 11:00 am Service Date Attendance Vehicles Ratio 12/17/2000 237 80 2.96 24-Dec 199 70 2.84 31-Dec 192 71 2.70 01/07/2001 232 79 2.94 14-Jan 210 78 2.69 25-Feb 204 80 2.55 04-Mar 204 67 3.04 11-Mar 237 81 2.93 18-Mar 265 72 3.68 • 25-Mar 211 69 3.06 01-Apr 221 72 3.07 08-Apr 223 79 2.82 22-Apr 229 78 2.94 29-Apr 221 69 3.20 06-May 189 69 2.74 13-May 222 78 2.85 20-May 191 78 2.45 17-Jun 188 52 3.62 24-Jun 230 67 3.43 01-Jul 215 70 3.07 08-Jul 233 65 3.58 15-Jul 211 61 3.46 22-Jul 211 63 3.35 19-Aug 223 65 3.43 02-Sep 238 69 3.45 30-Sep 259 77 3.36 07-Oct 229 83 2.76 14-Oct 235 77 3.05 ' 21-Oct 214 70 3.06 Total - 6373 2089 3.05 The church does not have vehicle counts for dates missing from this analysis. • 11, Attachment 3 Agenda Item: Li- I Hearing Date: February 4,2002 Time: 7:30 PM • TAFFRE RT _- S. P �.RT�:TO=T 0 RE `PLANNING . � � � �,� OMMI;SSION= CITY OF'HOARD comraunity.Deve - Si:a.' 'gig;%7(BetterCommuruty ;'3 Folio CIritoFTIGARD OREGON SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY - CASE NAME: CODE AMENDMENT TO THE SHARED PARKING AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION PARKING REQUIREMENTS CASE NO.: Zone Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) ZOA2001-00003 PROPOSAL: . To review and amend the Religious Institution parking requirements within the Tigard Development Code to allow for more flexibility. The request revolves around the required seating that is currently imposed on the development of Religious Institutions within the City of Tigard. The current proposal involves three components: • Changing the-requirement from one space for every two seats, to one space for every 3-4 seats. • Allowing shared parking to occur up to 500 feet from the property • line for all uses. • Allowing some on-street parking to occur where streets are designed and improved to accommodate such parking. APPLICANT: Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries OWNER: N/A 9905 SW McKenzie Street Tigard, OR 97223 ZONE: N/A. . LOCATION: Citywide. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, and 2.1.3; The Metro 2040 Plan; and Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION ..: ... Staff,recommends ,that:. the.:Plannin' Commission .:alter: tt e?=Reli ions Institution af#�n requlremellis:?as determined=through the public hearing:process and make a`recommendatipFl`°_ ::`'; to.the Tigard`City Council •Yly ZOA2001-00003 - PAGE 1 OF 8 2/4/02 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION • • SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION • As the role of religion within our society evolves, the use is expanded and redesigned to accommodate the function of their respective purpose: Religious institutions have changed the way that they operate. One can no longer say that religious institutions are comprised of a main sanctuary and several small classrooms for Sunday school. In addition to Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts there are aerobics sessions, art lessons, counseling, day care and schools. Serving the larger community there are clothing banks, food pantries, meetings for varied 12 step programs, soup kitchens, and even drug treatment centers. As a result, neighbors can feel their communities are overwhelmed by churches now operating day and night, seven days a week. Many of the Religious Institutions within Tigard have indicated that they will be seeking to expand their facilities within the next few years. Several of the ministries approached City staff about amending the parking standards to reflect a standard that would be more in line with other jurisdictions around Tigard. Staff conducted a survey of surrounding jurisdiction requirements, and found that the Tigard Development Code was stricter than surrounding jurisdictions. However, a literature review of professional sources shows that Tigard regulations are in line with professional recommendations. To that end, staff was directed to work with a parking committee to come up with a resolution and proceed with an application to amend the code. SECTION IV. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA Chapter 18.380 states that legislative text amendments shall be undertaken by means of a Type IV procedure, as governed by. Section 18.390.060G. Chapter 18.390.060G states that the recommendation by. the Commission and the decision by the Council shall be based on consideration of the following factors: • The Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; Notice was provided to DLCD 45 days prior to the first scheduled public hearing as required. In addition, the Tigard Development Code and Comprehensive Plan have been acknowledged by DLCD. The following are the applicable Statewide Planning Goals that are applicable to this proposal: Statewide Planning Goal 1 — Citizen Involvement: This goal outlines the citizen involvement requirement for adoption of Comprehensive Plans and for changes to the Comprehensive Plan and implementing documents. This goal has been met by complying with the Tigard Development Code notice requirements set forth in Chapter 18.390. Notice has been published in the Tigard Times Newspaper prior to the public hearing. Two Public'Hearings are held (one before the Planning Commission and the second before the City Council) in which public input is welcome. Staff has also worked with a committee of citizens to review the alternatives. The City CIT members were also notified of the proposed changes. ZOA2001-00003 PAGE 2 OF 8 2/4/02 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION • • • Statewide Planning Goal 2 — Land Use Planning: This goal outlines the land use planning process and policy framework. The Comprehensive Plan was acknowledged by DLCD as being consistent with the statewide planning goals. The Development Code implements the Comprehensive Plan. The Development Code establishes a process for and policies to review changes to the Development Code consistent with Goal 2. The City's plan provides analysis and policies with which to evaluate a request for amending the Code consistent with Goal 2. Any applicable Metro regulations; Two Metro regulations need to be considered with regard to this request: Title 2: (Metro code 3.07.210-3.07.220) Regional Parking Policy The Metro 2040 Growth Concept calls for more compact development as a means to encourage more efficient use of land, promote non-auto trips and protect air quality. In addition, the federally mandated air quality plan adopted by the state relies on the 2040 . Growth Concept fully achieving its transportation objectives. This title established regionwide-parking policies that set the minimum number of parking spaces which can be required by local governments for certain types of new development. It does not affect existing development. Parking maximums are also specified. By not creating an over supply of parking, urban land can be used most efficiently. The City of Tigard implements this policy through its off-street parking standards. Currently, Tigard's parking standard for religious institutions is the maximum minimum allowed by Metro. The proposed amendment will act to reduce the minimum parking standards for religious institutions to 1 space for every 3 seats in the main sanctuary or 1 space for every four seats in the main sanctuary as long as a parking plan is provided that illustrates that the 1/3 requirement can be met utilizing variances, adjustments, and the alternatives proposed as part of this amendment. Title 3: (Metro code 3.07.310-3.07.370) Water Quality and Flood Management Conservation The' goal of the Stream and Floodplain Protection Plan (Title 3) is to protect the region's health and public safety by reducing flood and landslide hazards, controlling soil erosion and reducing pollution of the region's waterways. The proposed amendment will potentially reduce the amount of impervious surface, thereby providing additional opportunity for water - to be filtered through natural systems, and allowing runoff that would otherwise tax the stormwater system to be accommodated on site. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies: Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.1.1: This policy states that all future legislative changes shall be consistent with the Statewide Planning Goals and the Regional Plan adopted by Metro. As indicated above under the individual Statewide and Regional Plan goals applicable to this proposed amendment, the amendment is consistent with the Statewide Goals and Regional Plan. ZOA2001-00003 PAGE 3 OF 8 2/4/02 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION • • Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.1.1: This policy states that the City shall maintain an ongoing citizen involvement program and shall assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process. This policy is satisfied because notice of the proposed amendment was mailed to all Citizen Involvement Team (CIT) Members and the amendment was discussed at a regular monthly CIT meeting. In addition, notice was published in the Tigard Times of the Public Hearing and notice will be published again prior to the City Council public hearing. Public input has been invited in the notice. Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.1.2 and 2.1.3: In pertinent part, this policy states that the Citizen Involvement Team program and the Citizen Involvement Team Facilitators shall serve as the primary means for citizen involvement in land use planning. Policy 2.1.3 states that information on land use planning issues shall be available in understandable form. These policies were satisfied because notice of the proposed amendment was mailed to all Citizen Involvement Team (CIT) Members and the amendment was discussed at a regular monthly CIT meeting. An attempt was made in the written notices and the amendment itself to make the proposal understandable to anyone who reads it. • Any applicable provision of the City's implementing ordinances. Code Section18.380: This section regulates amendments. It outlines the process for reviewing Development Code Text Amendments. The present amendment will be reviewed under the Type IV legislative procedure as set forth in the chapter. Code Section 18.390: This chapter establishes standard decision-making procedures for reviewing applications. The amendment under consideration will be reviewed under the Type IV legislative procedure as detailed in the chapter. Code Section 18.765: This chapter establishes parking requirements intended to provide sufficient vehicle parking in close proximity to the various uses for residents, customers and employees, and to establish standards which will maintain the traffic carrying-capacity of nearby streets. These regulations are also intended to establish vehicle-parking areas which have adequate capacity and which are appropriately located and designed to minimize any hazardous conditions on the site and at access points. The present amendment will satisfy this purpose as illustrated in the following analysis. ZOA2001-00003 PAGE 4 OF 8 2/4/02 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION • • SECTION V. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed amendment allows religious institutions and in cases of shared parking, other uses, some added flexibility. There is an inherent conflict between required parking based on peak demand and actual need as peak demand is not always consistent. And, there are many pros and cons to accommodation of parking. The amendment under consideration would relax the current one space for every two seats in the main sanctuary. It would allow religious institutions. to utilize several alternatives to meet the underlying ratio of one space for every three seats in the main sanctuary. The benefits of requiring less parking include less impervious surface, more space for development or open space, and less stress on the Tigard stormwater system. The downside is discussed in more detail below. In order to realize the current proposal, the following steps were taken. Staff was approached by the Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries (TVCM), a conglomerate of Tigard Churches, to review and amend the Tigard Development Code (TDC) to allow one space for every four seats in the main sanctuary. As a result of this request, staff began researching the validity of the problem. It was discovered in a survey of other jurisdictional requirements (Exhibit B), that Tigard was in fact stricter than the surrounding jurisdictions when it came to parking. It was also discovered in a literature survey of professional resources that parking requirements for religious institutions varied dramatically across the country. In some instances the ratio was one space for every ten seats in the main sanctuary, and in other cases, the requirement was one space for every two seats in the main sanctuary. There . seemed to be no real justification for any one standard. Staff proceeded to continue researching alternatives and solutions that would accommodate the Religious Institutions in Tigard, but those same alternatives and solutions would also have to relieve Tigard neighborhoods of added congestion and conflicts that become a problem during religious activities. As indicated in the previous discussion, citizens value the right to peaceful enjoyment of their,neighborhoods almost as much as their right to freedom of religion. The professional resources, Eno Foundation for Transportation, Inc. and Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) both indicate that one space for every two seats is appropriate based on demand, but concede that the actual requirements are highly variable. In describing parking demand, the Eno Foundation states that, "...parking demand is defined as the accumulation of vehicles parked at a given time as a result of activity at a given site. Demands may reflect maximum accumulations during the average day, peak day of the week, or during the peak season of the year. Irrespective of when -they occur, parking accumulations result 'from interactions between three traffic variables: total daily trips attracted, time pattern of arrivals, and average lengths of stay. To illustrate, two sites with the same land area and floor space may attract equal daily numbers of vehicles, yet their parking accumulations can be quite different. If at one location cars arrive nearly simultaneously and park for an average of eight hours, its parking accumulation could be four times that of the second site, if the second site's vehicle arrivals are spread out evenly over eight hours and the average length of stay is 2 hours. Thus, in determining parking needs, the arrival pattern and length of stay (parking duration) are as important as the total number of daily vehicles attracted."(Pg. 37) ZOA2001-00003 PAGE 5 OF 8 2/4/02 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION • However, in the case of most religious institutions, peak demand is not met as frequently as. most uses. So, staff could concede that at times other than main service times, the requirement of one space for every two seats in the main sanctuary could seem onerous. According to the 2000 Census results, the average household size is 2.48 persons in the City of Tigard. Assuming every household in Tigard attended a religious function in only one car per family, the on site parking ratio would need to be 1 space for every 2.48 seats in the sanctuary to accommodate all parking on site. Staff realizes that every household in Tigard does not attend only one church, but all of the parishioners are not Tigard residents, and we traditionally plan for worst case scenarios. The ITE manual conducted parking studies of religious institutions that show a direct correlation with the requirement of one space for every two seats in the main sanctuary. The results of their studies are illustrated in the following table: DATA PLOT AND EQUATION 800 w 700- a U 600 - F 0 L" 500- n 0 0 400- 0 • Y • - ¢ ' 300 . a w 200 - a n- 100 • n 0 200 400 .600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 X = NUMBER OF ATTENDEES 0 ACTUAL DATA POINTS FITTED CURVE Fitted Curve Equation: P = 0.495(X) - 4.0 R2 = 0.849 ZOA2001-00003 PAGE 6 OF 8 2/4/02 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION a • • Religious Institutions are defined as, "places of religious worship which may include related accessory uses such as offices, classrooms, auditoriums, social halls, gymnasiums, and other recreational activities" in the Tigard Development Code. When these ancillary uses become a part of a particular institution, the activities on site increase, and so does the demand for parking. There does not appear to be significant overlap with religious services, so the code does not place any additional requirements for the accessory uses. However, religious institutions are permitted conditionally or outright in every residential and commercial zoning district, and our inability to treat them individually as it relates to parking, undoubtedly creates conflict in those institutions that are located within or close to neighborhoods. As a result, the stricter standard is more appropriately imposed to prevent conflict. The amendment before the Commission is an attempt to balance the needs of the neighborhoods with the needs of the religious institutions. The proposal was drafted as a result of research, departmental comments, and the cooperation of a parking committee comprised of two representatives from the TVCM, one representative from a neighborhood that recently voiced concerns regarding a Church parking facility, and .one Planning Commission member. The proposed changes to the code can be reviewed in Exhibit "A." The only change that was not agreed upon by the committee was the change in ration from 1 space for every 3.3 seats to 1 space for every 3 seats. Staff made this change in light of the census results. Staff observation is that in this day large numbers of single and two person vehicles attend churches. The 1 space for every 4 seat standard may have been more relevant in a time when more families and larger families attended Church together. In summary, the changes include relaxing the base standard to one space for every three seats, permitting religious institutions to count on-street parking where the street is adjacent to the site, designed, and improved to accommodate on street parking, and allowing shared parking to be accommodated at sites that are up to 500 feet away from the site as opposed to the 300 feet currently in the code. The 500-foot standard would apply to all uses. This amendment came about after staff researched the state Transportation Planning Rule as it relates to the acceptable walking distance for pedestrians. Typically, pedestrians consider a quarter of a mile to be acceptable in pedestrian oriented developments. If an applicant can show that the one space for every three seats can be illustrated in a parking plan utilizing a combination of the above measures, adjustments, and variances, then they would be required to only accommodate parking at one space for every four seats in the main sanctuary on site. SECTION VI. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Leave the code as is The standard would remain at 1 space for every 2 seats in the main sanctuary, no on-street parking could be counted, and shared parking would only occur within 300 feet of the front building line. Accommodate parking at 1 space for every 4 seats in the main assembly area without any other changes. ZOA2001-00003 PAGE 7 OF 8 2/4/02 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION • • • SECTION VII. ADDITIONAL CITY STAFF & OUTSIDE AGENCY COMMENTS The Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue Department has had an opportunity to review this proposal and has found that the proposal does not conflict with their interests. The City of Tigard Engineering Department has had an opportunity to review this proposal and have no objections. Two Citizen Involvement Team Members responded to the proposal and one indicated that she had concerns with the lack of parking/planning in the Tigard downtown. The other CIT member had no objections. The City of Tigard Public Works and Operations Department has had an opportunity to review this proposal and have no objections. The City of Tigard Police Department has had an opportunity to review this proposal and have no objections. Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation, DLCD, City of Tigard Building Division, ODOT, Tualatin Valley Water District, Clean Water Services, Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District, and Metro Land use and Planning Growth Management have all had an opportunity to review this proposal and have offered no comments or objections to the proposed Zone Ordinance Amendment. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A— Community Development Code Chapter 18.765, Table 18.7652 Exhibit B — Jurisdictional Survey Results .,c- i January 23, 2002 PREPARED BY:Brad Kil y DATE Associate Planner . January 23, 2002 APPROVED BY:Richard Bewersdorft DATE Planning Manager ZOA2001-00003 PAGE 8 OF 8 2/4/02 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION • • EXHIBIT A Religious Institution Parking Amendment Proposals • 18.765.030 General Provisions B. Location of vehicle parking. The location of off-street parking will be as follows: • 1. Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling(s); 2. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 500 feet from the building-er-aseproperty line that they are required to serve, measured in a straight lincalong the most direct, publicly accessible pedestrian route from the building-property line with the following exceptions: a. Commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 388-500 feet from the primary site; b. The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; • 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. C. Joint parking. Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1. The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; • • 3. If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements D. Exclusions to minimum vehicle parking requirements. The following shall not be counted towards the computation of the minimum parking spaces as required in Section 18.765.070H: 1. 4—On-street parking. Parking spaces in the public street or alley shall not be eligible as fulfilling any part of the parking requirement; except; Religious Institutions may count on-street parking around the perimeter of the use provided that the following criteria have been satisfied: a) The on-street parking is on a street that is designed and physically improved to accommodate parking within the right-of- way. b) The street where on-street parking is proposed is not located on local residential classified streets. Table 18.765.2 Minimum and Maximum Required Off-street Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Requirements Religious 1.0/2-3 161 seats in Institutions main assembly area (M) 161 Religious Institutions may provide 1 space for every four seats on site in the main assembly area provided that they supply the City with-a parking plan that demonstrates that the peak parking demand of 1 space for every 3 seats is met utilizing any combination of the alternatives and adjustments mentioned in this chapter. s EXHIBIT B The following survey was conducted in the last week of September, 2001. It is a representation of the answers received from jurisdictions that responded to e-mail and telephone inquiries, as well as, information gathered from online resources. The City of Tigard currently requires a minimum of one parking space for every two seats in the main assembly area. City of Gresham - requires a minimum of .3 spaces for every seat or 1 space for every six lineal feet of bench seating within the main sanctuary. The City of Gresham also recognizes a maximum of .6 spaces for every 1 seat or 1 space for every 4.5 lineal feet of bench seating within the main " sanctuary. City of Tualatin - requires a minimum of 1 space per 4 seats or 1 space for every eight feet of bench length. City of Hillsboro - requires a minimum of.25 spaces per seat. City of Portland - requires a minimum of 1 space for every 100 square feet within the main assembly area under one standard, and 1 space for every 67 square feet of main assembly areas in another standard. Standards are determined by the underlying zone. City of Beaverton - requires a minimum of .25 spaces for every 1 seat. • Attachment 41 CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community MEMORANDUM TO: City Council and Planning Commission FROM: Brad Kilby,Associate Planner DATE: February 28, 2002 SUBJECT: Follow-up for Religious Institution Parking Requirements In response to the question posed by the Planning Commission as to what Washington County requires for Religious Institutions, Washington County requires 1 space for every 2 seats in the main sanctuary. The proposal before the City Council would relax the parking standard for development within the Tigard city limits, but not for development within the"Urban Service Area." • S 11. �u l City of Tigard Community Dewlopment TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION g ShaCommunity FEBRUARY 4, 2002 7:30 p.m. TIGARD CIVIC CENTER —TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OREGON 97223 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. COMMUNICATIONS 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4.1 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA) 2001-00003 RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE PARKING CODE AMENDMENT REQUEST: A request to review and amend the Religious Institution parking requirements within the Tigard Community Development Code to allow for more flexibility. The request revolves around the required seating that is currently imposed on the development of Religious Institutions within the City of Tigard. The current proposal involves three components: Changing the requirement from one space for every two seats, to one space for every 3-4 seats; Allowing shared parking to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses; Allowing some on-street parking to occur where streets are designed and physically improved to accommodate such parking. LOCATION: Citywide. ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2 and 2.1.3; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765. 5. OTHER BUSINESS 6. ADJOURNMENT / . • Agenda Item: 4. 1 Hearing Date: February 4,2002 Time: 7:30 PM • STAFF REPORT TO THE : A : :PLANNING COMMISSION; CITY O ill4Z.� Community(Deveropment FOR THE CITY:OF TIGARD,:OREGON S aping f Bet ter.Community:' SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE NAME: . CODE AMENDMENT TO THE SHARED PARKING AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION PARKING REQUIREMENTS CASE NO.: Zone Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) ZOA2001-00003 PROPOSAL: To review and amend the Religious Institution parking requirements within the Tigard Development Code to allow for more flexibility. The request revolves around the required seating that is currently imposed on the development of Religious Institutions within the City of Tigard. The current proposal involves three components: • Changing the requirement from one space for every two seats, to one space for every 3-4 seats. • Allowing shared parking to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses. • Allowing some on-street parking to occur where streets are designed and improved to accommodate such parking. APPLICANT: Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries OWNER: N/A 9905 SW McKenzie Street Tigard, OR 97223 ZONE: N/A. LOCATION: Citywide. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, and 2.1.3; The Metro 2040 Plan; and Statewide Planning Goals land 2. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff-:recommends that the 'Planning Commission alter: the Religious Institution parking, requirements.as determined-through the public hearing process and make-a recommendation to the Tigard,City Council. ZOA2001-00003 PAGE 1 OF 8 2/4/02 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION • • SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION As the role of religion within our society evolves, the use is expanded and redesigned to accommodate the function of their respective purpose. Religious institutions have changed the way that they operate. One can no longer say that religious institutions are comprised of a main sanctuary and several small classrooms for Sunday school. In addition to Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts there are aerobics sessions, art lessons, counseling, day care and schools. Serving the larger community there are clothing banks, food pantries, meetings for varied 12 step programs, soup kitchens, and even drug treatment centers. As a result, neighbors can feel their communities are overwhelmed by churches now operating day and night, seven days a week. Many of the Religious Institutions within Tigard have indicated that they will be seeking to expand their facilities within the next few years. Several of the ministries approached City staff about amending the parking standards to reflect a standard that would be more in line with other jurisdictions around Tigard. Staff conducted a survey of surrounding jurisdiction requirements, and found that the Tigard Development Code was stricter than surrounding jurisdictions. However, a literature review of professional sources shows that Tigard regulations are in line with professional recommendations. To that end, staff was directed to work with a parking committee to come up with a resolution and proceed with an application to amend the code. SECTION IV. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA Chapter 18.380 states that legislative text amendments shall be undertaken by means of a Type IV procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.060G. Chapter 18.390.060G states that the recommendation by the Commission and the decision by the Council shall be based on consideration of the following factors: The Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; Notice was provided to DLCD 45 days prior to the first scheduled public hearing as required. • In addition, the Tigard Development Code and Comprehensive Plan have been acknowledged by DLCD. The following are the applicable Statewide Planning Goals that are applicable to this proposal: Statewide Planning Goal 1 — Citizen Involvement: This goal outlines the citizen involvement requirement for adoption of Comprehensive Plans and for changes to the Comprehensive Plan and implementing documents. This goal has been met by complying with the Tigard Development Code notice requirements set forth in Chapter 18.390. Notice has been published in the Tigard Times Newspaper prior to the public hearing. Two Public Hearings are held (one before the Planning Commission and the second before the City Council) in which public input is welcome. Staff has also worked with a committee of citizens to review the alternatives. The City CIT members were also notified of the proposed changes. ZOA2001-00003 PAGE 2 OF 8 2/4/02 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION • • Statewide Planning Goal 2 — Land Use Planning: This goal outlines the land use planning process and policy framework. The Comprehensive Plan was acknowledged by DLCD as being consistent with the statewide planning goals. The Development Code implements the Comprehensive Plan. The Development Code establishes a process for and policies to review changes to the Development Code consistent with Goal 2. The City's plan provides analysis and policies with which to evaluate a request for amending the Code consistent with Goal 2. Any applicable Metro regulations; Two Metro regulations need to be considered with regard to this request: Title 2: (Metro code 3.07.210-3.07.220) Regional Parking Policy The Metro 2040 Growth Concept calls for more compact development as a means to encourage more efficient use of land, promote non-auto trips and protect air quality. In addition, the federally mandated air quality plan adopted by the state relies on the 2040 Growth Concept fully achieving its transportation objectives. This title established regionwide-parking policies that set the minimum number of parking spaces which can be required by local governments for certain types of new development. It does not affect existing development. Parking maximums are also specified. By not creating an over supply of parking, urban land can be used most efficiently. The City of Tigard implements this policy through its off-street parking standards. Currently, Tigard's parking standard for religious institutions is the maximum minimum allowed by Metro. The proposed amendment will act to reduce the minimum parking standards for religious institutions to 1 space for every 3 seats in the main sanctuary or 1 space for every four seats in the main sanctuary as long as a parking plan is provided that illustrates that the 1/3 requirement can be met utilizing variances, adjustments, and the alternatives proposed as part of this amendment. Title 3: (Metro code 3.07.310-3.07.370) Water Quality and Flood Management Conservation The goal of the Stream and Floodplain Protection Plan (Title 3) is to protect the region's health and public safety by reducing flood and landslide hazards, controlling soil erosion and reducing pollution of the region's waterways. The proposed amendment will potentially reduce the amount of impervious surface, thereby providing additional opportunity for water to be filtered through natural systems, and allowing runoff that would otherwise tax the stormwater system to be accommodated on site. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies: Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.1.1: This policy states that all future legislative changes shall be consistent with the Statewide Planning Goals and the Regional Plan adopted by Metro. As indicated above under the individual Statewide and Regional Plan goals applicable to this proposed amendment, the amendment is consistent with the Statewide Goals and Regional Plan. ZOA2001-00003 PAGE 3 OF 8 2/4/02 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION • • Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.1.1: This policy states that the City shall maintain an ongoing citizen involvement program and shall assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process. This policy is satisfied because notice of the proposed amendment was mailed to all Citizen Involvement Team (CIT) Members and the amendment was discussed at a regular monthly CIT meeting. In addition, notice was published in the Tigard Times of the Public Hearing and notice will be published again prior to the City Council public hearing. Public input has been invited in the notice. Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.1.2 and 2.1.3: In pertinent part, this policy states that the Citizen Involvement Team program and the Citizen Involvement Team Facilitators shall serve as the primary means for citizen involvement in land use planning. Policy 2.1.3 states that information on land use planning issues shall be available in understandable form. These policies were satisfied because notice of the proposed amendment was mailed to all Citizen Involvement Team (CIT) Members and the amendment was discussed at a regular monthly CIT meeting. An attempt was made in the written notices and the amendment itself to make the proposal understandable to anyone who reads it. Any applicable provision of the City's implementing ordinances. Code Section18.380: This section regulates amendments. It outlines the process for reviewing Development Code Text Amendments. The present amendment will be reviewed under the Type IV legislative procedure as set forth in the chapter. Code Section 18.390: This chapter establishes standard decision-making procedures for reviewing applications. The amendment under consideration will be reviewed under the Type IV legislative procedure as detailed in the chapter. Code Section 18.765: This chapter establishes parking requirements intended to provide sufficient vehicle parking in close proximity to the various uses for residents, customers and employees, and to establish standards which will maintain the traffic carrying-capacity of nearby streets. These regulations are also intended to establish vehicle-parking areas which have adequate capacity and which are appropriately located and designed to minimize any hazardous conditions on the site and at access points. The present amendment will satisfy this purpose as illustrated in the following analysis. ZOA2001-00003 PAGE 4 OF 8 2/4/02 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION • • SECTION V. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed amendment allows religious institutions and in cases of shared parking, other uses, some added flexibility. There is an inherent conflict between required parking based on peak demand and actual need as peak demand is not always consistent. And, there are many pros and cons to accommodation of parking. The amendment under consideration would relax the current one space for every two seats in the main sanctuary. It would allow religious institutions to utilize several alternatives to meet the underlying ratio of one space for every three seats in the main sanctuary. The benefits of requiring less parking include less impervious surface, more space for development or open space, and less stress on the Tigard stormwater system. The downside is discussed in more detail below. In order to realize the current proposal, the following steps were taken. Staff was approached by the Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries (TVCM), a conglomerate of Tigard Churches, to review and amend the Tigard Development Code (TDC) to allow one space for every four seats in the main sanctuary. As a result of this request, staff began researching the validity of the problem. It was discovered in a survey of other jurisdictional requirements (Exhibit B), that Tigard was in fact stricter than the surrounding jurisdictions when it came to parking. It was also discovered in a literature survey of professional resources that parking requirements for religious institutions varied dramatically across the country. In some instances the ratio was one space for every ten seats in the.main sanctuary, and in other cases, the requirement was one space for every two seats in the main sanctuary. There seemed to be no real justification for any one standard. Staff proceeded to continue researching alternatives and solutions that would accommodate the Religious Institutions in Tigard, but those same alternatives and solutions would also have to relieve Tigard neighborhoods of added congestion and conflicts that become a problem during religious activities. As indicated in the previous discussion, citizens value the right to peaceful enjoyment of their neighborhoods almost as much as their right to freedom of religion. The professional resources, Eno Foundation for Transportation, Inc. and Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) both indicate that one space for every two seats is appropriate based on demand, but concede that the actual requirements are highly variable. In describing parking demand, the Eno Foundation states that, "...parking demand is defined as the accumulation of vehicles parked at a given time as a result of activity at a given site. Demands may reflect maximum accumulations during the average day, peak day of the week, or during the peak season of the year. Irrespective of when they occur, parking accumulations result from interactions between three traffic variables: total daily trips attracted, time pattern of arrivals, and average lengths of stay. To illustrate, two sites with the same land area and floor space may attract equal daily numbers of vehicles, yet their parking accumulations can be quite different. If at one location cars arrive nearly simultaneously and park for an average of eight hours, its parking accumulation could be four times that of the second site, if the second site's vehicle arrivals are spread out evenly over eight hours and the average length of stay is 2 hours. Thus, in determining parking needs, the arrival pattern and length of stay (parking duration) are as important as the total number of daily vehicles attracted."(Pg. 37) ZOA2001-00003 PAGE 5 OF 8 2/4/02 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION • • However, in the case of most religious institutions, peak demand is not met as frequently as most uses. So, staff could concede that at times other than main service times, the requirement of one space for every two seats in the main sanctuary could seem onerous. According to the 2000 Census results, the average household size is 2.48 persons in the City of Tigard. Assuming every household in Tigard attended a religious function in only one car per family, the on site parking ratio would need to be 1 space for every 2.48 seats in the sanctuary to accommodate all parking on site. Staff realizes that every household in Tigard does not attend only one church, but all of the parishioners are not Tigard residents, and we traditionally plan for worst case scenarios. The ITE manual conducted parking studies of religious institutions that show a direct correlation with the requirement of one space for every two seats in the main sanctuary. The results of their studies are illustrated in the following table: DATA PLOT AND EQUATION 800 w 700- a 8 600- o O U 500 - 0 a 0 400 - z - d 300 - fL w 240 - a tt a. 100 0 0 0 I i 1 I I i- I IT II 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 X = NUMBER OF ATTENDEES 0 ACTUAL DATA POINTS FITTED CURVE Fitted Curve Equation: P = 0.495(X) - 4.0 R2 = 0.849 ZOA2001-00003 PAGE 6 OF 8 2/4/02 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION • • Religious Institutions are defined as, "places of religious worship which may include related accessory uses such as offices, classrooms, auditoriums, social halls, gymnasiums, and other recreational activities" in the Tigard Development Code. When these ancillary uses become a part of a particular institution, the activities on site increase, and so does the demand for parking. There does not appear to be significant overlap with religious services, so the code does not place any additional requirements for the accessory uses. However, religious institutions are permitted conditionally or outright in every residential and commercial zoning district, and our inability to treat them individually as it relates to parking, undoubtedly creates conflict in those institutions that are located within or close to neighborhoods. As a result, the stricter standard is more appropriately imposed to prevent conflict. The amendment before the Commission is an attempt to balance the needs of the neighborhoods with the needs of the religious institutions. The proposal was drafted as a result of research, departmental comments, and the cooperation of a parking committee comprised of two representatives from the TVCM, one representative from a neighborhood that recently voiced concerns regarding a Church parking facility, and one Planning Commission member. The proposed changes to the code can be reviewed in Exhibit "A." The only change that was not agreed upon by the committee was the change in ration from 1 space for every 3.3 seats to 1 space for every 3 seats. Staff made this change in light of the census results. Staff observation is that in this day large numbers of single and two person vehicles attend churches. The 1 space for every 4 seat standard may have been more relevant in a time when more families and larger families attended Church together. In summary, the changes include relaxing the base standard to one space for every three seats, permitting religious institutions to count on-street parking where the street is adjacent to the site, designed, and improved to accommodate on street parking, and allowing shared parking to be accommodated at sites that are up to 500 feet away from the site as opposed to the 300 feet currently in the code. The 500-foot standard would apply to all uses. This amendment came about after staff researched the state Transportation Planning Rule as it relates to the acceptable walking distance for pedestrians. Typically, pedestrians consider a quarter of a mile to be acceptable in pedestrian oriented developments. If an applicant can show that the one space for every three seats can be illustrated in a parking plan utilizing a combination of the above measures, adjustments, and variances, then they would be required to only accommodate parking at one space for every four seats in the main sanctuary on site. SECTION VI. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Leave the code as is- The standard would remain at 1 space for every 2 seats in the main sanctuary, no on-street parking could be counted, and shared parking would only occur within 300 feet of the front building line. Accommodate parking at 1 space for every 4 seats in the main assembly area without any other changes. • ZOA2001-00003 PAGE 7 OF 8 2/4/02 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION • • SECTION VII. ADDITIONAL CITY STAFF & OUTSIDE AGENCY COMMENTS The Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue Department has had an opportunity to review this proposal and has found that the proposal does not conflict with their interests. The City of Tigard Engineering Department has had an opportunity to review this proposal and have no objections. Two Citizen Involvement Team Members responded to the proposal and one indicated that she had concerns with the lack of parking/planning in the Tigard downtown. The other CIT member had no objections. The City of Tigard Public Works and Operations Department has had an opportunity to review this proposal and have no objections. The City of Tigard Police Department has had an opportunity to review this proposal and have no objections. Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation, DLCD, City of Tigard Building Division, ODOT, Tualatin Valley Water District, Clean Water Services, Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District, and Metro Land use and Planning Growth Management have all had an opportunity to review this proposal and have offered no . comments or objections to the proposed Zone Ordinance Amendment. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A— Community Development Code Chapter 18.765, Table 18.765.2 Exhibit B — Jurisdictional Survey Results �,,,c- 6.4 January 23, 2002 PREPARED BY:Brad Kilby - DATE Associate Planner _ , 7 Cr ) i - !la -,- January 23, 2002 APPROVED BY:Richard Bewersdorft �- DATE Planning Manager ZOA2001-00003 PAGE 8 OF 8 2/4/02 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION • • EXHIBIT A Religious Institution Parking Amendment Proposals • 18.765.030 General Provisions B. Location of vehicle parking. The location of off-street parking will be as follows: 1. Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling(s); 2. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200-500 feet from the building or useprorerty line that they are required to serve, measured in a straight linoalong the most direct, publicly accessible pedestrian route from the building-property line with the following exceptions: a. Commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300-500 feet from the primary site; b. The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. C. Joint parking. Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1. The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; i • 3. If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements D. Exclusions to minimum vehicle parking requirements. The following shall not be counted towards the computation of the minimum parking spaces as required in Section 18.765.070H: 1_1. On-street parking. Parking spaces in the public street or alley shall not be eligible as fulfilling any part of the parking requirement; except; Religious Institutions may count on-street parking around the perimeter of the use provided that the following criteria have been satisfied: a) The on-street parking is on a street that is designed and physically improved to accommodate parking within the right-of- way. b) The street where on-street parking is proposed is not located on local residential classified streets. Table 18.765.2 Minimum and Maximum Required Off-street Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Requirements Religious 1.0/2-3 161 seats in Institutions main assembly area (M) [61 Religious Institutions may provide 1 space for every four seats on site in the main assembly area provided that they supply the City with-a parking plan that demonstrates that the peak parking demand of 1 space for every 3 seats is met utilizing any combination of the alternatives and adjustments mentioned in this chapter. • ! EXHIBIT B • The following survey was conducted in the last week of September, 2001. It is a representation of the answers received from jurisdictions that responded to e-mail and telephone inquiries, as well as, information gathered from online resources. The City of Tigard currently requires a minimum of one parking space for every two seats in the main assembly area. City of Gresham - requires a minimum of .3 spaces for every seat or 1 space for every six lineal feet of bench seating within the main sanctuary. The City of Gresham also recognizes a maximum of .6 spaces for every 1 seat or 1 space for every 4.5 lineal feet of bench seating within the main sanctuary. City of Tualatin - requires a minimum of 1 space per 4 seats or 1 space for every eight feet of bench length. City of Hillsboro - requires a minimum of .25 spaces per seat. City of Portland - requires a minimum of 1 space for every 100 square feet within the main assembly area under one standard, and 1 space for every 67 square feet of main assembly areas in another standard. Standards are determined by the underlying zone. City of Beaverton - requires a minimum of .25 spaces for every 1 seat. • 01/02/2002 12:48 FAX 5036847297 City of Tigard a 001 • ********************* • *** TX REPORT *** ********************* • TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO 4006 CONNECTION TEL 5036418757 SUBADDRESS CONNECTION ID ST. TIME 01/02 12:47 USAGE T 00'56 PGS. SENT 3 RESULT OK • 474460„, • `h ^� __� SETTING THE STANDARD FOR SERVICE EXCELLENCE Facsimile To: f� Q�^ 1 �t'1-t-lt �OP ; f•l — Company: Phone: $03 GA I - 304 y Fax: S.03 Cfl y ( - g ? s r7 From: 3JRA0 Company: City of Tigard Phone: (503)6394171 Fax: (503)684-7297 Date: j/a(OD Pages including this page: 3 l COMMENTS: LtERE tS --Le ?cal 44c4- wit( 4-ke Plat,n mw„ sion [ 1 rt�ant aooa .�•• +� C �c)nC: 1 De, ave. -1-: rhe. 503 ts1-3 .. t-11 1 9,+4. S� TICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOLD• • NOTICE E, R,VENDOR OR SELLER:- THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER 1a � CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community y�7�i 37� 7�,}7�: 7f t 7�,' 'u _.'.`-,,,?';,,,..-:•.^,-3'o-:.="5""'"�. :�i�.S.:-'s'ri4 _ - :;=iii-i,•'.�. �;ti�:�'�s`,,�,5`''u'•'�, :: ._.,.. : EVIy mE ._.....,•.a ._:__ :s.�.:`: . � rcYS.� -�.-... a:.;i ;k:!-,],•1:'.6;:: .}.: ;by:i._' .^n'i;.+ =f`S'^_ _.F..._ e�4, y.�..;3.�":r�.1� -•'t;" :.:rya;.i4'� '��Jx a;.` _ �'�.•i.;'` .>1v:.r°=":=.::� - rs' 'YjMa_:o,j':._ .•..°y. ::.cr -._�r,✓: fir. .. -.f.�w.t ,;F::- `_`��` •�. •„�:_..::t - ' .,.:�:may';: .ai: 3. - =:S;:t",m= ::E„6j.,yi, ,°7'.r,':': ._.t3t:.p.gr.;t;':p s;_ set•,`,_._ � ...ts p• .vir a - wru.✓.. a".-}.4"d"S.x_�>i;.z. :£.".::-:�v:ya.{f. ..a-.n.. ✓.•.r...... .«-.:v.v waS:J"ti':<:v9,.�.•«......:e,eNJ.rJa..::r.4:<.'i���:f::,Cv._..ii,.SS'1w':.w:e ,.y,..3. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE FOLLOWING WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ON MONDAY. FEBRUARY 4, 2002 AND BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY-1-2,-2002 MARCH 12, 2002 (could potentially be heard earlier by the City Council based on the Planning Commission's recommendation). THE HEARINGS WILL BE. HELD AT 7:30 PM IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER AT 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. FILE NO.: ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA) 2001-00003 FILE TITLE: RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE PARKING AMENDMENT • APPLICANT: Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries OWNER: N/A 9905 SW McKenzie Street Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: A request to review and amend the Religious Institution parking requirements within the Tigard Development Code to allow for more flexibility. The request revolves around the required seating that is currently imposed on the development of Religious Institutions within the City of Tigard. The current proposal involves three components: • Changing the requirement from one space for every two seats, to one space for every 3-4 seats; • Allowing shared parking to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses; • Allowing some on-street parking to occur where streets are designed and physically improved to accommodate such parking. LOCATION: Citywide. ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2:1.2 and 21.3; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765. THE PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNDER TITLE 18 AND THE RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL OR THE RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN SECTION 18.390.060E. • ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. PUBLIC ORAL OR WRITTEN TESTIMONY IS INVITED. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARINGS, THE HEARING AUTHORITY WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARING AUTHORITY MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. THE PURPOSE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S REVIEW IS TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. THE COUNCIL WILL THEN HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE REQUEST PRIOR TO MAKING A DECISION. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25 ) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER BRAD KILBY AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. • NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOL R,VENDOR OR SELLER: • THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. !1 CITY OF TIGARD Community cDeveropment Shaping A Better Community PUBLIC. NEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE FOLLOWING WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ON MONDAY, FEBRUARY 4. 2002 AND BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2002. THE HEARINGS WILL BE HELD AT 7:30 PM IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER AT 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. FILE NO.: ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA) 2001-00003 FILE TITLE: RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE.PARKING AMENDMENT APPLICANT: Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries OWNER: N/A 9905 SW McKenzie Street Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: A request to review and amend the Religious Institution parking requirements within the Tigard Development Code to allow for more flexibility. The request revolves around the required seating that is currently imposed on the development of Religious Institutions within the City of Tigard. The current proposal involves three components: • • Changing the requirement from one space for every two seats, to one space for every 3-4 seats; • Allowing shared parking to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses; • Allowing some on-street parking to occur where streets are designed and physically improved to accommodate such parking. LOCATION: Citywide. ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2 and 2.1.3; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765. THE PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNDER TITLE 18 AND THE RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL OR THE RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN SECTION 18.390.060E. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. PUBLIC ORAL OR WRITTEN TESTIMONY IS INVITED. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARINGS, THE HEARING AUTHORITY WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING,AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARING AUTHORITY MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. THE PURPOSE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S REVIEW IS TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. THE COUNCIL WILL THEN HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE REQUEST PRIOR TO MAKING A DECISION. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER BRAD KILBY AT(503)639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. ¶ EQUEsr �bR CcMMArrS • KELLY E. FORD, P.C. • ATTORNEY AT LAW 14355 Southwest Allen Blvd.,Suite 100 Beaverton,Oregon 97005-4404 Facsimile(503)641-8757 Telephone(503)641-3044 Email kford.law @gte.net January 28, 2002 RECEIVED PLANNING • By Facsimile to 503 684-7297 and US Mail JAN 3 0 2002 Brad Kilby (.;11.1" G~T1GARD Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard OR 97223 • Re: Proposed change to church parking requirements Dear Brad, I have your staff report materials,which I see do not mention our discussions about footnote 6. Please place the enclosed materials in the record as my written testimony on behalf of Westgate Baptist Church. I will mail the originals to you in tomorrow's mail. I hope you concur the proposed amendment to footnote 6 is needful. Thank you. Very truly •. Ford KF:ab Cc: Pastor Les Seig by fax to 503 624-2364 • • • KELLY E. FORD, P.C. ATTORNEY AT LAW 14355 Southwest Allen Blvd.,Suite 100 Beaverton,Oregon 97005-4404 Facsimile(503)641-8757 Telephone(503)641-3044 Email kford.law @gte.net January 28, 2002 To: Tigard Planning Commission From: Kelly Ford Re: Item 4.1 Zone Ordinance Amendment 2001-00003 Religious Institute Parking Code Amendment. Dear Members of the Planning Commission: I am a member of the Citizen Task Force that developed the proposed amendments that are the subject matter of this item. I am also a member of and general counsel to Westgate Baptist Church at 12930 SW Scholls Ferry Road, Tigard, which currently has a conditional use application pending in connection with its development of a new multi-purpose building that will seat 600 for church services. This testimony is offered on behalf of Westgate Baptist Church in favor of the proposed amendment. Westgate agrees with the proposed new ordinance with a single exception. The proposed terminology of footnote six of Table 18.765.2 purports to require parking of not less than one space per three seats in the main assembly area, including ""any combination of the alternatives and adjustments mentioned in this chapter." The "alternatives" referred to are such things as joint parking agreements. "Adjustments" are provided in the code for such things as development of mass transit improvements on site, and in situations where the applicant proves its vehicle demand is less than the applicable minimum parking standard would require be accommodated. Grant of an adjustment can reduce the minimum required parking below the table minimum. No separate parking standard is stated in footnote 6 for religious institutions whose . applications do not involve adjustments, and that is not the intent of this proposal. Thus, the proposed terminology is unclear at best, and quite possibly, would not permit adjustments to affect the required minimum ratio. That is contrary to the express terms of the adjustment provisions of the codes, which are created for the precise purpose of permitting decreases to the amount of required parking, where applicable. I also believe it is not the intention of any of the Task Force members to create such an inflexible provision. Religious institutions should have the same opportunity.to apply for and receive adjustments to required parking as other uses. Therefore, I ask the Commission to adopt the following language in footnote.6 instead of the language in the staff report: • January 28, 2002 • • . : Page 2 Footnote 6: "Religious institutions may provide 1 space for every four seats on site in the main assembly area provided that they supply the City with a parking plan that demonstrates that the peak parking demand of 1 space for every 3 seats is met utilizing any combination of the alternatives mentioned in this chapter. Adjustments to the minimum parking of 1 space for every 3 seats may be granted per applicable provisions of the Code, but shall not decrease the amount of required on-site parking to less than 1 space for every four seats unless the cumulative value of all adjustments granted results in an adjusted requirement of less than one space per four seats." For the Commission's information, in light of the existing standard of one space for every two seats and Westgate Baptist Church's need to receive an adjustment to that ratio under existing adjustment procedures, Westgate has conducted a survey of its attendance and vehicle count for its 11:00 a.m. service that shows our average vehicle occupancy has been one vehicle for each 3.05 persons in attendance. A copy of that report is attached. . I have no reason to believe our ratio is significantly different than other churches. Our average count per car is higher than the average family size cited in the staff materials. Reasons for this include carpooling, which is especially common among seniors, use of TriMet, which stops by the church, some pedestrian traffic, and disproportionately higher church attendance among families with children as opposed to single adults. 0 The existing ratio of one space per two seats in the main assembly area has the effect of blocking any further development of substantial sized churches within the City of Tigard. Design standards require approximately one acre of land for each 100 parking spaces which, under the existing code, means one acre of parking for each 200 attendees. To develop an assembly area for 600 attendees such as the Westgate proposal, under the current standard approximately three acres must be devoted to parking. Adding the building itself with an appropriate number of classrooms means that it takes a four acre site to build a medium size church, without any consideration of other uses such as outdoor athletic facilities. There are very few sites remaining within the city that will accommodate that size church, and almost none that will accommodate a larger church. The amendment provided by this proposal before you is desperately needed. Thank you. • • WESTGATE BAPTIST CHURCH 12930 SW Scholls Ferry Road, Tigard, OR 97223 11:00 am Service Date Attendance Vehicles Ratio 12/17/2000 237 80 2.96 24-Dec 199 70 2.84 31-Dec 192 71 2.70 01/07/2001 232 79 2.94 14-Jan 210 78 2.69 • 25-Feb 204 80 2.55 04-Mar 204 67 3.04 11-Mar 237 81 2.93 18-Mar 265 72 3.68 25-Mar 211 69 3.06 01-Apr 221 72 3.07 08-Apr 223 79 2.82 22-Apr 229 78 2.94 29-Apr 221 69 3.20 06-May 189 69 2.74 13-May 222 78 2.85 20-May 191 78 2.45 17-Jun 188 52 3.62 24-Jun 230 67 3.43 01-Jul 215 70 3.07 08-Jul 233 65 3.58 15-Jul 211 61 3.46 22-Jul 211 63 3.35 19-Aug 223 65 3.43 02-Sep 238 69 3.45 30-Sep 259 77 3.36 07-Oct 229 83 2.76 14-Oct 235 77 3.05 21-Oct 214. 70 3.06 Total 6373 2089 3.05 The church does not have vehicle counts for dates missing from this analysis. Bradley Kilby- Religious Institute Parking Code Amendment.doc _ WY Page 1 • • TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE • SOUTH DIVISION COMMUNITY SERVICES • OPERATIONS • FIRE PREVENTION January 14,2002 Brad Kilby,Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Religious Institute Parking Code Amendment—ZOA 2001-00003 Dear Brad, I have reviewed the submittal for the above named project and find no conflicts with our interests. Please contact me at(503)612-7010 with any additional questions. Sincerely, Eric T. McMullen • Eric T. McMullen Deputy Fire Marshal 7401 SW Washo Court,Suite 101 •Tualatin,Oregon 9rife22•oT61.(503)612-7000•Fax(503)612-7003•www.tvfr.com C aht REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community cDevetopment Shaping Better Community DATE: December 27, 2001 TO: Brian Roger,Development Review Engineer RECEIVED PLANKING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division JAN 0 2 2002 STAFF CONT - . B - : - 1 •y, Associate Planner (x388) 'hone: (503) 639-4171/Fax: (503) 684-7297 CITY OF TIGARD ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA)2001-00003 ➢ RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE PARKING CODE AMENDMENT Q REQUEST: A request to review and amend the Religious Institution parking requirements within the Tigard Community Development Code to allow for more flexibility. The request revolves around the required seating that is currently imposed on the development of Religious Institutions within the City of Tigard. The current proposal involves three components: • Changing the requirement from one space for every two seats, to one space for every 3-4 seats; • Allowing shared parking to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses; • Allowing some on-street parking to occur where streets are designed and physically improved to accommodate such parking. LOCATION: Citywide. ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2 and 2.1.3; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765. Attached is a "DRAFT" of the Proposed Amendments for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JANUARY 10. 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEA CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Please provide the following infonnation)Name of Person(s) Commenting: K S k 6 I Phone Number(s): I • b .a REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: December 27, 2001 TO: All Citizen Involvement Team Members FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby, Associate Planner (x388) Phone: (503) 639-4171/Fax: (503) 684-7297 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA)2001-00003 ➢ RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE PARKING CODE AMENDMENT < REQUEST: A request to review and amend the Religious Institution parking requirements within the Tigard Community Development Code to allow for more flexibility. The request revolves around the required seating that is currently imposed on the development of Religious Institutions within the City of Tigard. The current proposal involves three components: • Changing the requirement from one space for every two seats, to one space for every 3-4 seats; • Allowing shared parking to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses; • Allowing some on-street parking to occur where streets are designed and physically improved to accommodate such parking. LOCATION: , Citywide. ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2 and 2.1.3; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765. Attached is a "DRAFT" of the Proposed Amendments for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JANUARY 10, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. I:RLEASE-CHECKTHE>FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY= -3- -_. ,� �,sue.�, ..,,•...-mss... _r.. ..:.v.... - :.,.•, _.._ .,._ ...r ,.. ,. • e r ., -... ..?': .., We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. - Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: I I Phone Number(s): I • RECEIVED PLANNING • C) JAN 0 3 2002 To: Brad Kilby, Assoc. Planner 01 CYO ° CITY OF TIGARD As a memb f the All Citizen Involvement Team I've made time to review the attached, *&my comments: Focused solely on a petition for changing requirements based on seating. Also parking "shared up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses? Allowing some on-street parking where streets are designed and physically improved to accommodate such parking. I'm well acquainted with our Downtown Tigard Main St. lacking parking, with the side roads Burthalp,Commercial failing to provide sidewalks and parking eerr property ownerships? As a result our Downtown Tigard could benefit by each ownership providing customer parking which has never been done? I am the owner of the Bishop Building and parking per rentor is available for their customers. When standing in our office on the second floor one views all the roofs and unkept grounds surrounding existing commercial uses? Pay: could increase downtown parking for their customers rather than utilizing the few commercial enterprises who do provide asphalt paving for parking customers. I'm always taken back by the lack of failure by the City of Tigard to address the need for commercial parking spaces. Our Downtown Merchants Assoc. seems to feel they represent the area but I've not seen the changes to increase public works or private ownership improvements to make our downtown visually attractive nor foot traffic showing shoppers walking thru our downtown area? If our City aim is to bring the Downtown into the current 'century' we need to draw the pubidcinto downtown to shop. Parking is vital to the success of downtown rather than putting funds yearly into what has been done, planters, flags, etc. Quaint 'look' has been addressed by adjacent cities to keep "old town alive" but parking is essential. When we built our building it was mandatory to provide,pArking yet the older least#d out builings were new ver participating in a provision to provide parking X11 around their buildings are weeds-vacantt land that could be a _and utilized by not only their rentors but custers_? A Boy is now providing so much parking that no doubt people wishing tom to walk the walk park there and then walk to and from the next two blocks as Main St, only comprises about the equivalent of 4 blocks. I've noted a big difference when in A-Boy as to the old established less parking of most businesses depelddng upon Main St. strip. .. only. Yet be their businesses is ammo yAoa .t weed property, unfinished parking�.reas''f paved,behind and signage showing an arrow "PARKING' ...off;Main St. owners would be doing their responsible obligation to rentors....just like like„1:722y. Sure many of us are using A-Boy to get to the other businesses who have failed to provide parking? Chuck Woodard has put in parking beyond even his number of customers so why not the other merchants ownerships do the same? I see a need to rezone downtown Tigard into high rises up by Commerciale from Main St. to Hall Blvd.-adding to the zoning that has had mobile housing which to me was poorly zoned for locationale. We need a building 'mix' housing is all around us and Washington Square - but what about Tigard Square -to facilitate our own City ..df Tigard tax base? We have a lot of high quality housing all around us, only problem is they don't have a "downtown" to roam, shopy,-village style so one can meet his 'neighbor' and spend their funds within our own City limits. On City of Tigard staff we have the most qualified leadership. Ed Wagner of Public Works has gone all out in his department and it shows not only in Cook Park but all over Tigard. What's so hard for staff to figure out to inc eas interest on Main St.? We keep importing planners where are they as f as downtown Tigard needs? We as $!'' $ r took this responsibility others have no • • �I P, REQUEST FOR COMMENTS O IIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: December 27, 2001 TO: Matt Stine,Urban Forester/Public Works Department FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby, Associate Planner (x388) Phone: (503) 639-4171/Fax: (503) 684-7297 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA)2001-00003 RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE PARKING CODE AMENDMENT < REQUEST: A request to review and amend the Religious Institution parking requirements within the Tigard Community Development Code to allow for more flexibility. The request revolves around the required seating that is currently imposed on the development of Religious Institutions within the City of Tigard. The current proposal involves three components: • Changing the requirement from one space for every two seats, to one space for every 3-4 seats; • Allowing shared parking to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses; • Allowing some on-street parking to occur where streets are designed and physically improved to accommodate such parking. LOCATION: Citywide. ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2 and 2.1.3; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765. Attached is a "DRAFT" of the Proposed Amendments for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JANUARY 10, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. . Written comments provided below: 14RE HERE Y ,mPAcrs xo TREES 7 is 19-A y M 17-Ia r/t,A) c t I�►IAT7� S17M 121az (Please provide the following information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: I Phone Number(s): I • • 4 . . REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI Y IGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: December 27, 2001 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Dennis Koellermeier,Operations Manager/Water Department JAN 0 3 2002 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby, Associate Planner (x388) Phone: (503) 639-4171/Fax: (503) 684-7297 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA)2001-00003 ➢ RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE PARKING CODE AMENDMENT < REQUEST: A request to review and amend the Religious Institution parking requirements within the Tigard Community Development Code to allow for more flexibility. The request revolves around the required seating that is currently imposed on the development of Religious Institutions within the City of Tigard. The current proposal involves three components: • Changing the requirement from one space for every two seats, to one space for every 3-4 seats; • Allowing shared parking to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses; • Allowing some on-street parking to occur where streets are designed and physically improved to accommodate such parking. LOCATION: Citywide. ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2 and 2.1.3; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765. Attached is a "DRAFT" of the Proposed Amendments for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JANUARY 10, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. • PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ( o c drnw•a ANACJ '-, ‘ a)� tOK hyb//-47---/Ji • - 177 if, / (ease provide the following information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: I Phone Number(s): I • - • • A� REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI OF TIIGARD Community cDeve(opment Shaping Better Community DATE: December 27, 2001 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: n Roy,Property Manager/Public Works Department JAN 0 3 2002 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby, Associate Planner (x388) Phone: (503) 639-4171/Fax: (503) 684-7297 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA)2001-00003 > RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE PARKING CODE AMENDMENT < REQUEST: A request to review and amend the Religious Institution parking requirements within the Tigard Community Development Code to allow for more flexibility. The request revolves around the required seating that is currently imposed on the development of Religious Institutions within the City of Tigard. The current proposal involves three components: . Changing the requirement from one space for every two seats, to one space for every 3-4 seats; • Allowing shared parking to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses; • Allowing some on-street parking to occur where streets are designed and physically improved to accommodate such parking. LOCATION: Citywide. ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2; Comprehensive Plan Policies.1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2 and 2.1.3; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765. Attached is a "DRAFT" of the Proposed Amendments for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JANUARY 10, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provitle thefo1Twing information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: I Phone Number(s): I 111 • 44,REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TIIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: December 27, 2001 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Barbara Shields,Long Range Planning Manager JAN 0 3 2002 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY t TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby, Associate Planner (x388) Phone: (503) 639-4171/Fax: (503) 684-7297 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA)2001-00003 ➢ RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE PARKING CODE AMENDMENT < REQUEST: A request to review and amend the Religious Institution parking requirements within the Tigard Community Development Code to allow for more flexibility. The request revolves around the required seating that is currently imposed on the development of Religious Institutions within the City of Tigard. The current proposal involves three components: • Changing the requirement from one space for every two seats, to one space for every 3-4 seats; • Allowing shared parking to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses; • Allowing some on-street parking to occur where streets are designed and physically improved to accommodate such parking. LOCATION: Citywide. ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2 and 2.1.3; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765. Attached is a "DRAFT" of the Proposed Amendments for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JANUARY 10, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: /4°Z°`e-- (Please proviufe the following information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: I Phone Number(s): . • • A REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C.OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: December 27, 2001 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer DEC 2 8 2001 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby, Associate Planner (x388) Phone: (503) 639-4171/Fax: (503) 684-7297 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA)2001-00003 > RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE PARKING CODE AMENDMENT < REQUEST: A request to review and amend the Religious Institution parking requirements within the Tigard Community Development Code to allow for more flexibility. The request revolves around the required seating that is currently imposed on the development of Religious Institutions within the City of Tigard. The current proposal involves three components: • Changing the requirement from one space for every two seats, to one space for every 3-4 seats; • Allowing shared parking to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses; • Allowing some on-street parking to occur where streets are designed and physically improved to accommodate such parking. LOCATION: Citywide. ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2 and 2.1.3; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765. Attached is a "DRAFT" of the Proposed Amendments for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JANUARY 10, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments: If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. P LEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: / We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: • (lease provide the foffcnving information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: VV� e I Phone Number(s): y'vb I • • . REQUEST FOR COMMENTS o IIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: December 27, 2001 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: All Citizen Involvement Team Members DEC 3 1 2001 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF T1GARD STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby, Associate Planner (x388) Phone: (503) 639-4171/Fax: (503) 684-7297 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA)2001-00003 ➢ RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE PARKING CODE AMENDMENT < I REQUEST: A request to review and amend the Religious Institution parking requirements within the I Tigard Community Development Code to allow for more flexibility. The request revolves around the required seating that is currently imposed on the development of Religious Institutions within the City of Tigard. The current proposal involves three components: • Changing the requirement from one space for every two seats, to one space for every 3-4 seats; • Allowing shared parking to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses; • Allowing some on-street parking to occur where streets are designed and physically improved to accommodate such parking. LOCATION: Citywide. ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW-CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2 and 2.1.3; and. Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765. Attached is a "DRAFT" of the Proposed Amendments for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JANUARY 10, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. IDLFao►" En± s:.H. CK.THE FOLLO.V111NG ITEI111SsTHAT`APPLY z = q = 4:..:'= `^l:E.. )( We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (T&ase provide the following information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: , 1/ I Phone Number(s): 4-03/5 2 l 0 7 GO REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYO TIIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: December 27, 2001 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby Associate Planner Ix3881_ 1'none: (5O3) bn-41/1/1-ax: U3) 4-7297 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA)2001-00003 ➢ RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE PARKING CODE AMENDMENT Q REQUEST: A request to review and amend the Religious Institution parking requirements within the Tigard Community Development Code to allow for more flexibility. The request revolves around the required seating is currently imposed on the development of Religious Institutions within the City of Tigard. The current proposal involves three components: • Changing the requirement from one space for every two seats, to one space for every 3-4 seats; • Allowing shared parking to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses. . .Allowing some on-street parking to occur where streets are designed and physically improved to accommodate such parking. LOCATION: Citywide. ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2 and 2.1.3; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765. Attached is a "DRAFT" of the Proposed Amendments for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JANUARY 10, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (T1 ase provide the fodou ing information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: I Phone Number(s): I CITY• TIGARD REQUEST FOR CO•ENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: ZOA—A00‘ —00003 FILE NAME: CV ukC.H rA21F.if�Ci. AMCf.)otrErs-)i ... ' : CITIZEN INVOLVEMENTTEAMS; 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: ffeentral [East Eouth [West Proposal Descrip.in Library CIT Book _ . CITY:OFFICES.; ONG RANGE PLANNING/Barbara Shields,Planning Mgr. OMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT/Planning-Engineering Techs. 4/F.-POLICE DEPTJJim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer 1UILDING DMSION/Gary Lampella,Building Official GINEERING DEPTJBrian Rager,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer j,,eliVATER DEPTJDennis Koellermeier,Operations Mgr. CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder UBUC WORKS/John Roy,Property Manager 1gUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester 7(PLANNER—POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM-10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING! _C.DfSherman Casper,Permit Coord.(SDR/cuP remr) . ..SPECIAL DISTRICTS . -- . 1. . . /TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*_7TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* 'TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT♦ ✓CLEANWATER SERVICES+1r Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 °LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON* _ CITY OF TUALATIN• _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street NE _ Irish Bunnell,Development sem:es PO Box 369 . PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97301-1279 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING* _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE CITY OF DURHAM * 600•NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland.OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 v'Bob Knight,Data Resource Center(zCA) _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator �R.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP 333 SW First Avenue j/Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPAJZ0A) Larry French(Comp.Plan Amendments Only) PO Box 2946 _CITY OF KING CITY* _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 •Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _ C.D.Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 15300 SW 116th Avenue WASHINGTON COUNTY King City,OR 97224 _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(PowedinesinArea) _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO* Routing TTRC–Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Planning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369. Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 _Brent Curtis(CPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion(CPA) _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) 9 Ar DOT,REGION 1 * _Anne LaMountain(IGURB) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) onya Kazen,Development Review Coordinator A/ Phil Healy(IGuRB) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir. Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations> Steve Conway(General Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders r.Cartographer(CPA/zcA)MS 14 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 Jim Nims(ZCA)MS 15 Portland,OR 97204 _Doria Mateja(ZCA)MS 14 _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A Jane Estes,Permit Specialist 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Portland,OR 97221-2414 _.. UTILITY PROVIDERS-AND SPECIAL AGENCIES=_;, ,,,,,,,, ;; ; , ' _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northem/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 • —SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _AT&T CABLE _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Pat McGann (If Project is Within%Mile of A Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 _PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC —NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY —VERIZON _ QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Jim VanKleek,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Richard Jackson,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 — AT&T CABLE(■pp,.E.ueev&oravw) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Portland,OR 97232 * INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h:\pattytmasters\Request For Comments Notification List 2.doc (Revised: 7-Nov-01) • • • Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR. 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 MiChaelaTrigaboff 7072:SW Barb ra'zLane Tigard; OR 97223 Dieter`°Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard; OR 97223-6210 David Cfapnan 9840 SW.Landau Place Tigard; OR 97223 • Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard,'OR 97281 qN CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: December 27, 2001 . . • Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive#4 Tigard, OR 97224 Brooks Gaston 10272 SW Meadow Street Tigard, OR 97223 Don & Dorothy Erdt 13760 SW 121st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Mieh goii§tein • 14616 SW f3501Ave11le Tigard; OR 97224 Mar68- 8igh'cip-1 105ge ObliktAnce: Tigard;OR 51228 r\-f6tkeis*RigterE7(f: 180'8'6 8W ROCki6rd'Drive Tigard; OR 51223 Stiai5611k6:-! Ott'SW_ fi4tn,1516'86'.: ti§-60,OR' 51228 146-tfiri '4itrAr4n Murdock 9"i21.f • CITY OF TIGARD - CENTRAL CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT Central.doc) UPDATED: December 27, 2001 • • • Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Craig Smelter PO Box 1467 Tualatin, OR 97062 Harold and Ruth Howland 13145 SW Benish Tigard, OR 97223 Kevin Hogan 14357 SW 133rd Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 136th Place Tigard, OR 97224 Jon Sirrine 12761 SW 133rd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Judith Anderson 16640 SW Jordan Way King City, OR 97224 Beverly Froude 12200 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard, OR 97224 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 CITY OF TIGARD - WEST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (pg. I of I) (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT West.doc) UPDATED: December 27, 2001 • • Jack Biethan . 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335.SW Highland Drive' Tigard, OR 97224 LouiSe:Fronville 15760 SW oak'Meadow Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tim ESav PO Box 230695'x;•: Tigard, OR 97281 Nathan.and Ann.Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (pg. I of I) (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: December 27, 2001 01/17/2002 15: 39 5036418757 FORDGREY PAGE 01 • LLX E. FORD, • KELLY ,P.C. • ATTORNEY AT LAW 14355 Southwest Allen 131vd.,Suite 100 Beaverton,Oregon 97005-4404 • Facsimile(503)541-8757 Telephone(503)641-3044 Email l(fnrd.law.d gre,net January 17, 2002 By Facsimile to 503 684-7297 Brad Kilby Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW'Jail Blvd. Tigard OR 97223 Re: Proposed change to church parking requirements Dear Brad, Following our conversation this afternoon where we agreed that religious institutions should remain eligible for otherwise applicable parking adjustments that decrease the required amount of parking, how about changing footnote 6 to read, "Religious institutions may provide 1 space for every four seats on site in the main assembly area provided that they supply the City with a parking plan that demonstrates that the peak parking demand of 1 space for every 3 seats is met utilizing any combination of the alternatives provided in 18.765.030 B. and C., and 18.765.070 D.1. Adjustments to the minimum parking of 1 space for every 3 seats may be granted per applicable provisions of the Code, but shall not decrease the amount of required on-site parking to less than 1 space for every four seats unless the cumulative value of all adjustments granted results in a requirement of less than one space per four scats." The existing language is ambiguous,I think, as to the applicability of adjustments to the 1. to 3 ratio. The paragraph above permits them,while protecting the I to 4 on site requirement as a maximum unless very unusual circumstances exist. For example, two separate twenty percent adjustments to a 1 to 3 ratio would permit of a ration of 1 to 4.2. I do.n't expect there would be much occasion.where that large an adjustment would be approved. Thanks again for your good work. Very trul . s, • Kelly Ford • • KF:ab Cc; Pastor Les Seig by fax to 503 624-2364 • 01/16/2002 14:44 5036418757 FORDGREY PAGE 01 • KELLY E. FORD,P.C. • ATTORNEY AT LAW 14355 southwest Allen Blvd.,Suite 100 Beaverton,Oregon 97005-4404 Facsimile(503)641-8757 Tele phone 003)641-3044 Email I ord.law@gtc,har • January 16, 2002 By Facsimile to 503 684-7297 Brad Kilby, Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard OR 97223 • Re: Proposed change.to church parking requirements Dear Brad, I was looking through the proposed changes again., and I note as to footnote six, the original draft was changed only to add and adjustments." Looking back at my December I1 comments to the original draft, I was concerned that the original terminology might not permit adjustment upward from the minimum 3.3 to one ratio,whereas all other types of uses are currently permitted upward adjustments from the table minimums for such things as proof of special circumstances justifying less parking, transit improvements, etc. My proposed solution in the December 116' letter would have corrected the problem I pointed out by making it clear that only joint parking and on street parking were included in the minimum ratio, not adjustments. However, the modified language makes it even clearer that the problem I identified appears to be the intent of the code — no adjustments arc permitted. It very specifically sets 1 to 3 as an absolute floor on parking including alternatives and adjustments (in fact, that's an oxymoron —if it's an absolute standard, there is no adjustment permitted). So, I'm not happy with that current wording. Please call or respond by fax, because I need to address this in my comments to the Planning Commission. Have we written language contrary to the actual intent, or is staff intending to eliminate adjustments here? Thanks. Very to K lly E. ord Cc: Leslie Sieg by fax L Ly -- • • 12/31/2001 11: 09 04040404040404040404 PAGE 01 • KELLY E. FORD P.C. • ATTORNEY AT LAW 14355 Southwest Allen Blvd..Suite 100 Beavenon.Oregon 97005-4404 . Facsimile(503)641-8757 Telephone(503)641-3094 Email lOrd.law(gie.nel . • December 31, 2001 By facsimile to 503 684-7297 Brad Kilby Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall, Blvd. Tigard OR 97223 Re: Proposed change to church parking requirements • Dear Brad, About three weeks have passed since your last correspondence on the parking change for religious institutions. What is the status of this matter? Very truly. 1 Kelly E. Ford KF:ab • • • • .ri PMiM& MxrER4 LS • • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING OF TIGARD G ARD Community Development Shaping Better Community I, Patricia L. Lunsforcd being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of7igard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Cluck Appropriate Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:I 10A200I-00003/RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE PARKING AMENDMENT I 3/12/2002 AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ® Tigard City Council • • A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked EXhibit'B",and by reference made a part hereof, on March 13,2002,and deposited in the United States Mail on March 13,2002, postage prepaid. _ /• O (Person th Prepared N• ice)I • STATE OF OEGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) • . •Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 0 1 day of rn , 2002. I �,�`.i OFFICIAL SEAL � l ,=;'.=` DIANE M JELDERKS `-"� NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.326578 NOTARY PUBLIC OF 0 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 1 M 7 D� My Commission Exp . ` • • • EXHIBIT A 120 DAYS = N/A CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL Case Number: ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT(ZOA) 2001-00003 Case Name: RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE PARKING AMENDMENT Names of Owners: N/A Name of Applicant: Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries Address of Applicant: 9905 SW McKenzie Street Tigard, OR 97223 Address of Property: Citywide - Tax Map/Lot Nos.: N/A A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT(ORDINANCE NO.02-13). THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL HAVE REVIEWED THE APPLICANTS PLANS, NARRATIVE, MATERIALS, COMMENTS OF REVIEWING AGENCIES, THE PLANNING DIVISION'S STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON FEBRUARY 4, 2002 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE REQUEST. THE CITY COUNCIL ALSO HELD A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON MARCH 12, 2002 PRIOR TO MAKING A DECISION ON THE REQUEST. THIS DECISION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. Request: > A Zone Ordinance Amendment amending the Religious Institution parking requirements and the requirements for shared parking for all uses within the City of Tigard. The new regulations are as follows: ► Religious Institutions must provide one parking space for every three seats in the main assembly area as opposed to the previously imposed one parking space for every two seats in the main assembly area. ► For added flexibility, the religious institution may provide one space for every four seats in the main assembly area on the site as long as they provide staff with a parking plan that illustrates compliance with one space for every three seats utilizing adjustments,joint parking agreements, or on-street parking as outlined below. ► Joint parking is allowed to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses as opposed to the current standard of 200 feet from the building for residential and 300 feet from the building for commercial and industrial uses. ► Religious Institutions may count on-street parking where streets are designed and improved to accommodate such parking. Zone: N/A. Applicable Review Criteria: Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2 and 2.1.3; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765. Action: > ® Approved ❑ Approved with Conditions ❑ Denied Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: ® Affected Government Agencies. ® The Affected Citizen Involvement Team Final Decision: THIS IS THE FINAL DECISION OF THE.CITY AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON APRIL 11, 2002. All supporting documents relied upon to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. Copies of these items can also be obtained at a cost of$.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Appeal: A review of this decision may be obtained by filing a notice of intent with the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) according to their procedures. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division or the City Recorder at (503) 639-4171. • • • CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON • ORDINANCE NO. 02- 1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LANGUAGE OF THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ' CODE TO ALLOW FOR MORE FLEXIBILITY PERTAINING TO PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND JOINT PARKING THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF TIGARD. WHEREAS,the applicant requested a Zone Ordinance Amendment to adjust the parking requirements for religious institutions in all zones, to amend the maximum distance for shared parking in all zones, and to allow on-street parking for religious institutions in instances where the street is designed and improved to accommodate on-street parking;and WHEREAS,the City of Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 4, 2002 and reccommended approval of the proposed amendment by motion and a vote of 6 in favor, 1 against, and 1 abstention. WHEREAS, the City Council held a Public Hearing on the request on March 12, 2002 and indicated they were supportive of the proposed zone change and directed staff to prepare langauge and an Ordinance for Council review and approval;and WHEREAS, the City Council determined that the proposed language adequately addressed concerns regarding protecting both the residential neighborhoods, as well as,the interests of the Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries;and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable; any applicable Metro regulations; any applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies; and any applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Council has found the following to be the only applicable review criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, and 2.1.3; The Metro 2040 Plan; and Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed zone ordinance amendment is consistent with the applicable review criteria and that approving the request would be in the best interest of the City of Tigard. NOW,THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The specific text amendements attached as "EXHIBIT A" to this Ordinance are hereby adopted and approved by the City Council. SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By vote vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only,this f d - day of -trio,t,P , 2002. Gti- Catherine City Wheatley, Ci Recorder U ORDINANCE NO. 02- /3 Page 1 of 2 • • APPROVED: By Tigard Ci ty Council this/ da y of , 2002. 1A mes E. G fith, ���: Approved as to Attomey 1. ( 3 -z Date ORDINANCE NO. 02- /.3 Page 2 of 2 • • • • EXHIBIT A-1 • ADDITIONS: Indicated by UNDERLINE DELETIONS: Indicated by . (Additionally,a bar in the far right margin also indicates where a change has been made. Example:-* I ) Religious Institution Parking Amendment Proposals 18.765.030 General Provisions • B. Location of vehicle parking. The location of off-street parking will be as follows: • • 1. Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling(s); • 2. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 r.5.00 feet from the building-or-use prop y lino that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line ::along=they m'ostd ri ecf putilicly_=aceessible epedest►`iari`=route from the building rproperty.line with the following exceptions: a. Commercial and industrial uses which. require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 000 500 feet from the primary site; b. The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; • 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; • 4) Long-term spaces. C. Joint parking. Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1. The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the • • • number of vehicle parking spaces required by the Iarger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form • • of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3. If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. 18.765.70 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements • D. Exclusions to minimum vehicle parking requirements. The following shall not be counted towards the computation of the minimum parking spaces as required in Section 18.765.070H: • 1. On-street parking. Parking spaces in the public street or alley shall not be eligible as fulfilling any part of the parking requirement; except Religious-�ln`s titu:tlons.may.',counton-streetT.parking around_tfie"perimeter • of ahe.use°�p`rovided�th`at{;#tie"following:criteria><have3beensatisfied: a : .The:on-street.: aik ri P� .on aF sfreet tt at s7desi9n demn .d P : sic alN improved CI4eommodate iak6 ifh irl e'ir ght-of46 b'F :.The'<street.where=on-stre.et parking"is:proposed•.is-:no IocateCd::on local residential"=str..eet"s Table 18.765.2 Minimum and Maximum Required Off-street Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Requirements MINIMUM Religious Institutions 1.0/2 3rsj seats in main assembly area (M) jeNteliq ous istitutions'niaViiro"vide'1'rseace-_for:eVeiV4 seats on ite in=th'a=marn`assemblC atea:provided that theyasupplythe=Gity with',a iia�kings plan that demonstrates`-t1iatthe`peakspa�kinq demand of 1 space for every 3.seats:is`mef utiliz nq.anv"combination of•.the.alternative's-mentioned in_this chapter.:>'�Adiustme"n'ts°'to ihe'm niriium.parkina of 1'space-for everv'3=seats may}tie granted='per applicable provisions of`the code;.but .�"..,.. �'-'.: :•=' .: ,'•r,.,, .•.c.z.;..,.c.r„- .'.: < j,.¢..'ys".¢+i.���i ...,_�..�)ti:•�:c_ "'i:�'^rr .:..=^I,"u' ,�'Y."..:'"„- ,� ” shall not decrease.the amount°of=required'on-site parking to less than 1 vspace for,everv'4°;seats<(unless`tfe cumulative value`of all-adjustments:graiiteii'resulfs,in'an<adiusted requiremenYof less=tfian'1 space for."-66ry • 4:`seats. • • LX}Ji PIb Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries ZOA2001-00003 9905 SW McKenzie Street RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE PARKING AMENDMENT Tigard, OR 97223 NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE COUNCIL Leslie M. Sieg Westgate Baptist Church 13665 SW Fern Street Tigard, OR 97223 Sam Gotter 10125 SW Murdock Street Tigard, OR 97224 Judy Munro 12739 SW Danbush Court Tigard, OR 97223 Martha Bishop 10590 SW Cook Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Kelly Ford 13975 SW 27th Street Beaverton, OR 97008 Kelly Ford 14355 SW Allen Blvd., Suite 100 Beaverton, OR 97005-4404 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS • P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503)684-0360 Legal Notice TT 999° BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising . City of Tigard - • : 13125 SW Hall Blvd. CITY OF TIGARD r'�-gard.,O.regon 972..23 � . Accounts Payable ,tj' ''1'I� OREGON ,Tt.t� The following.. will E•:be ,considered by the Tigard Planning _: COninission on Monday, February 4, 2002.at 7:30.p.m..at the Tigard Civic Center—Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, AFFIDAVIT OF PUB Oregon. . STATE OF OREGON, Public oral or written testimony is invited.The public hearing on this matter will be held under Title'18 and rules of procedure adopted by COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) SS' the Council and available at City Hall or the rules of procedure set forth in Section 18.390.060E: The.Planning Commission's review is I, N.9.1:11y :;nyriPr for the purpose of making'a recommendation to the City Council on being first duly sworn, depose and say that I the;request..The:Council,"Wilt then hold a,public hearing on the Director, or his principal clerk, of thot's.gard. requestiiioraomakirg'adecision, ` W' a newspaper of general circulation as define Further information may: be obtained from the City of Tigard and 193.020; published at Tigard Planning Division at 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223,or aforesaid county and state; that the by calling.503-639=4171.. Puh1 i c HPari ng/7,OA 2001-0000 PUBLICSHEARINGITEM: • a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, wi ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT.(ZOA)2001.00003 >RELIGIOUS'INSTITUTE PARKING'CODE"AMENDMENT< entire issue of said newspaper for ONE REQUEST:'A request to review and amend the Religious Institution consecutive in the following issues: parking requirements within.the,Tigard Community tDevelopment code to allow for more,flexibility::.The;:Request,.revolves,:around the January 17 , 2 0 0 2. required seating,that is currently imposed on the development...of Religious Institutions within,the.City of_Tigard..The:current.proposal inv`olves,thr`ee;components ':..''' :% ♦• 'Changing`the requtremenffrom°one space:for every two seats,to 4 one space for every 3-4 seats;' • t. Allowing shared parking to occur.up ;t0 500 feet from the ` • property line for all uses; ♦ Allowing some on-street:'parking'to occur'where streets are Subscribed and sworn to be ore me this 1-1. designed .and 'physically, 'improved to accommodate such } IO : LOCC ATION:. Citywide. ZONE: N/A. APPLICABLE• REVIEW "CRITERIA:,Statewide Planning Goals 1 And;2; Comprehensive Notary Plana.Policies`.1:1.1, •;2.1.1,,,,2.,1•.2 and. 2.1:3; and. Community My Commission Expires: 1 Yol, / DevelopmentCodoChapters 18.380, 18.390 and-18.765:.TT9990-Publish`.January 17,2002. • AFFIDAVIT ----.-_. ___-__ N. • • • . AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING z '''' CITY OF TIGARD • Community cDeveropment Shaping Better Community I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City ofYgard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: • . .. (Check Apprxpnate Box(s)Bebw) . ® NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: fi 10A2001-00003/RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE PARKING AMENDMENT (2/4/2002 &.2/12/2002) File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council - A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof, on January 3,2002,and deposited in the United States Mail on lannary 3,2002, postage prepaid. , --) • 1/1 ill:/,e/-4.i 1 I I I I I I 1:■4, ' ._ _ „.. (Perso. at P1'= red N•tic STATE OF OXEGON County of Washington )ss. • . City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the Le day of ---���a, r , 2001, OFFICIAL.SEAL ._ 'j)= DIANE M JELDERKS • . I \'", / NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO..326578 / MY COMMISSION EXPIRES;SE T.07 , C-- P 2003 NO Y PUBLIC OF OR . r My Commission Exp •s: 9/73 • NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOL R, •VENDOR OR SELLER: • THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community * * * * * *REVISED* * * * * * PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE FOLLOWING WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ON MONDAY. FEBRUARY 4, 2002 AND BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ON TUESDAY~ FEBRUARY---1-22002 MARCH 12, 2002 (could potentially be heard earlier by the City Council based on the Planning Commission's recommendation). THE HEARINGS WILL BE HELD AT 7:30 PM IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER AT 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. FILE NO.: ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA) 2001-00003 FILE TITLE: RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE PARKING AMENDMENT APPLICANT: Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries OWNER: N/A 9905 SW McKenzie Street Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: A request to review and amend the Religious Institution parking requirements within the Tigard Development Code to allow for more flexibility. The request revolves around the required seating that is currently imposed on the development of Religious Institutions within the City of Tigard. The current proposal involves three components: • Changing the requirement from one space for every two seats, to one space for every 3-4 seats; • Allowing shared parking to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses; • Allowing some on-street parking to occur where streets are designed and physically improved to accommodate such parking. LOCATION: Citywide. ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2:1.2 and 2:1.3; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765. THE PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNDER TITLE 18 AND THE RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL OR THE RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN SECTION 18.390.060E. • • ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. PUBLIC ORAL OR WRITTEN TESTIMONY IS INVITED. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARINGS, THE HEARING AUTHORITY WILL RECEIVE A. STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARING AUTHORITY MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. THE PURPOSE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S REVIEW IS TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. THE COUNCIL WILL THEN HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE REQUEST PRIOR TO MAKING A DECISION. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25 ) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER BRAD KILBY AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. • • Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries ZOA2001-00003 9905 SW McKenzie Street RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE PARKING AMENDMENT Tigard, OR 97223 Attention Plan Amendment Specialist Department of Land Conservation & Development 635 Capital Street NE, Suite 150 Salem, OR 97301-2540 Metro Land Use & Planning 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland, OR 97232-2736 ODOT — Region 1, District 2-A Jane Estes, Permit Specialist 5440 SW Westgate Drive, Suite 3 Portland, OR 97221-2414 • Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive#4 Tigard, OR 97224 Brooks Gaston 10272 SW Meadow Street Tigard, OR 97223 Don & Dorothy Erdt 13760 SW 121st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beirstein 14630 SW 1:39ttvAvehile Tigardi OR 97224 Maitha Sigh1050 SW Cdok:Lane Tigard, OR 97223 VaneSia Foster: 13085 SW Howard Drive Tigard; OR 97223 • Stiahteilke 11755 SW f149i Pike Ti§ard, OR 97223 Ng*and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 . . CITY OF TIGARD - CENTRAL CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT Central.doc) UPDATED: December 27, 2001 • • Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michgl:Trigoboff 707)2"SW7tra'rbaratn6' Tigard? OR 97223 bialleclatObs 7715(8W Siiicce•Stteet Tigard, OR 81223 Alaarideitfag head 12205 SW 461143oulevard Tigatd, OFk 97223-6210 Tiprd, OR 72:2: D'aciikrAkian!: Ofir8WI:a-ridaiikPlke Nath6rVgrrid'Ann Murdock Pd 3óx. 31 TigatV, brR 97281' CITY OF. TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curplMsetup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: December 27, 2001 • • Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 LOCiiSd Fr nVille 1560 SW Oak;Meadow'Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tim.E8av, ,:" PO go 230695 Tigard, OR 9728f Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 • CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH CR SUBCOMMITTEE (pg. I of I) (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: December 27, 2001 • • Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Craig Smelter PO Box 1467 Tualatin, OR 97062 Harold and Ruth Howland 13145 SW Benish Tigard, OR 97223 Rt4itir:Hdgan 14357 SW f33rd'AiikiieC Tigard; OR p7224 tiretch-ohlidu'ohner 1=524SW-1.36o! Place TigaAVORi'laiTiC Jerf,8irriri4 12161,SW f:331'dAvenue Tigard; OR 07223 egderson 1.064 SW kiri6tit0141124 6eVddife6cide'',): 12- 6SW 0611 Mountain Road Nathan and Ann Murdock Pd Bok 231205', Tigard, OR 97281- ' -•'' 11 CITY OF TIGARD - WEST (IT SUBCOMMITTEE (pg. I of I) (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT West.doc) UPDATED: December 27, 2001 • _2., .7, AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING G CITY OF TIARD Community Development SiapingA Better Community I, Patricia L. Luord, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of 7igar , 'Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) ® NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: 10A2001-00003/RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE PARKING AMENDMENT (2/4/2002 & 2/12/2002) File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked EXhibit'B", and by reference made a part hereof, on December 31,2001,and deposited in the United States Mail on December 31,2001, postage prepaid. • I I • ,,i. � G3�v (Person . -t Prepared- ,otice)/ • STATE OAF oEGoW ) County of'Was Washington )ss. City of igard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of 6//' , 2003„ • OFFICIAL SEAL p.:�.; DIANE M JELDERKS ? NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.326578 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 N Y1 OF OR My Commission En s: 7 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOL!R,VENDOR OR SELLER: • EXHIBIT A THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. CITY OF TIGARD Community cDeve(opment Shaping A Better Community PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE FOLLOWING WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ON MONDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2002 AND BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2002. THE HEARINGS WILL BE HELD AT 7:30 PM IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER AT 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. FILE NO.: ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA) 2001-00003 FILE TITLE: RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE PARKING AMENDMENT APPLICANT: Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries OWNER: N/A 9905 SW McKenzie Street Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: A request to review and amend the Religious Institution parking requirements within the Tigard Development Code to allow for more flexibility. The request revolves around the required seating that is currently imposed on the development of Religious Institutions within the City of Tigard. The current proposal involves three components: • Changing the requirement from one space for every two seats, to one space for every 3-4 seats; • Allowing shared parking to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses; • Allowing some on-street parking to occur where streets are designed and physically improved to accommodate such parking. LOCATION: Citywide. ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 2.1 .2 and 2.1.3; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.765. THE PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNDER TITLE 18 AND THE RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL OR THE RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN SECTION 18.390.060E. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. • • PUBLIC ORAL OR WRITTEN TESTIMONY IS INVITED. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEAR ING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARINGS, THE HEARING AUTHORITY WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARING AUTHORITY MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. THE PURPOSE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S REVIEW IS TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. THE COUNCIL WILL THEN HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE REQUEST PRIOR TO MAKING A DECISION. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25 ) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER BRAD KILBY AT(503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. • • EXHIEIT Tualatin Valley Christian Ministries ZOA2001-00003 9905 SW McKenzie Street RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE PARKING AMENDMENT Tigard, OR 97223 Attention Plan Amendment Specialist Department of Land Conservation & Development 635 Capital Street NE, Suite 150 Salem, OR 97301-2540 Metro Land Use & Planning 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland, OR 97232-2736 ODOT — Region 1, District 2-A Jane Estes, Permit Specialist 5440 SW Westgate Drive, Suite 3 Portland, OR 97221-2414 • Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Craig Smelter • PO Box 1467Y Tualatin, OR 97062 Harold and Ruth Howland 13145 SW Benish Tigard, OR 97223 [4iihE14fdgari 14351 SW f330-xikiJeL • Tigard; OR V224 Gretfiehl,gifehner 1.2249)SW,1.86th Place TiOrdirORP91222132 • Jihirié RI H(''' 1276f 8-W 33rd Avenue Tigard; OR 97223 1:0640. JO(dbli-104 kifiotiVoR1§724 • 6eV'e:rlifkU,de'"-r 1.266);SW Bull Mountain Road NOliari 00 iNnn"Murdock BoX723126517 Tigtd;CA 97281 • CITY OF TIGARD - WEST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (pg. I of I) (iAcurpin\setup\labels\CIT West.doc) UPDATED: December 27, 2001 • • Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 LaQise Frtlnville 15760 Sill Oak1MeadovVLane Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esau` +f=` PO`.Bo 230695''x=' ' Tigard, OR 97261 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265; Tigard, OR 97281 t. CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (pg. I of I) (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: December 27, 2001 • • Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive#4 Tigard, OR 97224 Brooks Gaston 10272 SW Meadow Street Tigard, OR 97223 Don & Dorothy Erdt 13760 SW 121st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beirstein 14630 SW 1;39tkAvehue Tigard, OR 97224 Martha Gish 10590 8W Cbbkliane Tigard, OR 97223 VaneasrasFoter: - 13085 SW Haward Drive Tip-di OR 97223 iMBéiIkë i17 SW 'f14tti'PlaCd TiOrd; OR 9723 Nathati and Mn Murdock Pb e6)(231265 Tigád; OR 97281' • - • CITY OF TIGARD - CENTRAL CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT Central.doc) UPDATED: December 27, 2001 • - . • • Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michieffrigoboff 7072:StiVtiarbaratke' Tigardi OR 97228 biate-Natobs 7775(8W8WriSca'Street Tigard, OR 97223 Allearidartraghead 12205 SW Rail,BOUlevard Tigard, OR 97;223-6210 D'aVidterfaiktiati 9g4dSWCalida0kPl6e fi4gdi §12: 13 KatharilarkrAnn Murdock 1-36:bbk3f6.6.!::\vrli''- tibgrd, 6Ft CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curplMsetup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: December 27, 2001 F rn.1 I • DLCD NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMENDM This form must be received by DLCD at least 45 days prior to the first evidentiary he per ORS 197.610, OAR Chapter 660- Division 18 and Senate Bill 543 and effective on June 30, 1999 (See reverse side for submittal requirements) Jurisdiction: City of Tigard Local File No.: ZOA2001-00003 (If no number,use none) Date of First Evidentiary Hearing: 2/4/2002 Date of Final Hearing: 2/12/2002 (Must be filled in) (Must be filled in) Date this proposal was sent or mailed: December 21, 2001 (45 days) (Date mailed or sent to DLCD) Has this proposal been submitted to DLCD? _Yes X No Date: N/A Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment _ Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment X Land Use Regulation Amendment _ Zoning Map Amendment _ New Land Use Regulation _ Other: (Please Specify Type of Action) Briefly summarize the proposal. Do not use technical terms. Do not write "See Attached." A Zone Ordinance Amendment to to review and amend the Religious Institution parking requirements within the Tigard Development Code to allow for more flexibility. The request revolves around the required seating that is currently imposed on the development of Religious Institutions within the City of Tigard. The current proposal involves three components: • Changing the requirement from one space for every two seats,to one space for every 3-4 seats. • Allowing shared parking to occur up to 500 feet from the property line for all uses. • Allowing some on-street parking to occur where streets are designed and physically improved to accommodate such parking. Plan Map Change from: N/A to N/A Zone Map Change from: N/A to N/A Location: Citywide Acres Involved: N/A Specified change in Density: Current: N/A Proposed: N/A Applicable Statewide Planning Goals: 1 & 2 Is an Exception proposed?_Yes X No Affected State or Federal Agencies, Local Governments or Special Districts: DLCD, Metro and ODOT Local Contact: Brad Kilby Area Code + Phone Number: (503) 639-4171 Address: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard City: Tigard, OR Zip Code + 4: 97223-8189 DLCD No.: Form 1 • SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS This form must be received by DLCD at least 45 days prior to the first evidentiary hearing per ORS 197.610,OAR Chapter 660-Division 18 and Senate Bill 543 and effective on June 30, 1999. 1. Send this Form and Two (2) Copies of the Proposed Amendment to: ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 635 CAPITAL STREET NE, SUITE 150 SALEM, OREGON 97301-2540 COPIES TO: Metro Land Use & Planning 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland, OR 97232-2736 ODOT—Region 1, District 2-A Jane Estes, Permit Specialist 5440 SW Westgate Drive, Suite 3 Portland, OR 97221-2414 2. Unless exempt by ORS 197.610 (2), proposed amendments must be received at the DLCD's SALEM OFFICE at least FORTY-FIVE (45) before the first evidentiary hearing on the proposal. The first evidentiary hearing is usually the first public hearing held by the jurisdiction's planning commission on the proposal. 3. Submittal of proposed amendments shall include the text of the amendment and any other information the local government believes is necessary to advise DLCD of the proposal. "Text" means the specific language being added to or deleted from the acknowledged plan or land use regulations. A general description of the proposal is not adequate. 4. Submittal of proposed "map" amendments must include a map of the affected area showing existing and proposed plan and zone designations. The map should be on 8 1/2 x 11 inch paper. A legal description, tax account number, address or general description is not adequate. 5. Submittal of proposed amendments which involve a goal exception must include the proposed language of the exception. 6. Need More Copies? You can copy this form on to 8-1/2x11 green paper only8-1/2x11 green paper only; or call the DLCD Office at (503) 373-0050; or Fax your request to: (503) 378-5518; or email your request to Larry.French(a_state.or.us — ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST. • • Religious Institution Parking Amendment Proposals • AFT, 18.765.030 General Provisions B. Location of vehicle parking. The location of off-street parking will be as follows: 1. Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling(s); 2. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 500 feet from the burg-er-tseproperty line that they are required to serve, measured in a straight linoalong the most direct, publicly accessible pedestrian route from the building-property line with the following exceptions: a. Commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40. spaces up to a distance of 300-500 feet from the primary site; b. The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. C. Joint parking. Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1. The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3. If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements D. Exclusions to minimum vehicle parking requirements. The following shall not be counted towards the computation of the minimum parking spaces as required in Section 18.765.070H: 1 . 1. On-street parking. Parking spaces in the public street or alley shall not be eligible as fulfilling any part of the parking requirement; except; Religious Institutions may count on-street parking around the perimeter of the use provided that the following criteria have been satisfied: a) The on-street parking is on a street that is designed and physically improved to accommodate parking within the right-of- way. b) The street where on-street parking is proposed is not located on local residential classified streets. Table 18.765.2 Minimum and Maximum Required Off-street Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Requirements Religious 1.0/2-3 161 seats in Institutions main assembly area (M) F61 Religious Institutions may provide 1 space for every four seats on site in the main assembly area provided that they supply the City with a parking plan that demonstrates that the peak parking demand of 1 space for every 3 seats is met utilizing any combination of the alternatives and adjustments mentioned in this chapter. N • • U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only;No Insurance Coverage Provided) .m rim.....i..m.u.imm7: o- F P C ' L US E c:, Postage $ t. .' Certified Fee _ Ct 'I O�r/ mark Return Re ceipt Fee ere r` (Endorsement Required) ,4 O• p ' Restricted Delivery Fee t , i'p (Endorsement Required) a' i T Total Postage&Fees E • , ,', }-0 y ' ' - Sent To r r--1 ODOT- Region 1, District 2-A I io Street,At Jane Estes, Permit Specialist I( ra Ciry,Sta15440 SW Westgate Drive, Suite 350 , 1 r- I Portland, OR 97221-2414 1 PS Form 3800,May 2000 See Reverse for Instructions I -- 1 ii SENDER:COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY i • Complete items 1, 2,and 3.Also complete A. Received by(Please Print Clearly) B. Date of Delivery i item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse (bit...,so At that hi can return the card to you. C. Signatur X ❑Agent ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, ❑Addressee a or on the front if space permits. D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes 1. Article Addressed to: \AI" n ' If YES,enter delive��ry �esd elowu ❑ No ti<< ,.._ O- v ODOT- Region 1, District 2-A o DEC 2 4 20tH `-, Jane Estes, Permit Specialist 2- /� 5440 SW Westgate Drive, Suite 350 3. Service Type \/(5,/,.) /'�l Portland, OR 97221-2414 ait Certified Mail Il Exprss Wfail•' ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise --- — — — — ❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D. IY 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes 2. Article Number(Copy from service label) 700O /k74 OOO 7 6/al 9 - I PS Form 3811,July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-00-M-0952 • r • • U.S. Postal Service • i CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only;No Insurance Coverage Provided) o- O (� F IlCij SLE I Postage MN= d .� \\) Certified Fee / J+ ' �!. ¢ Postrnarkyl Return Receipt Fee // Here`p t P- (Endorsement Required) a 1 �• O Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Mgt�1 �� O f`Y ij� r A �`b 1 Total Postage&Fees mi. S Cis U '6 r- Sent To a Metro o Street,Ap ATTN: LAND USE & PLANNING O 600 NE Grand Avenue o City,State r- Portland, OR 97232-2736 PS Form 3800,May 2000 See Reverse for Instructions ", SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY • Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Received by(Please Print Clearly) B. Date of Delivery item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. 0/24.N10e7� /2- p of • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the.card to you. C. Signatu • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, •X•oe/'A) V-4rtlt-1)(1 Agent or on the front if space permits. / ❑ Addressee D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes 1. Article Addressed to: If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑ No Metro ATTN: LAND USE & PLANNING 600 NE Grand Avenue 3. Service Type Portland, OR 97232-2736 pit,Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes 2. Article Number(Cop from service label) 7006 id 7. 9 7 ‘0/ 0 4'IJOq PS Form 3811,July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-00-M-0952 • S • U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only;No Insurance Coverage Provided) • • it] OFF Ci & L CfS Pos..- Ce/r t✓i �©- ps / Gr-1 Postmark rk Return R0-ei t Fee Here • (Endorseme tee uired) MINME n p Restricted -i ni p (Endorsement eqw U p S',7 Allino \� Total Postage& � ' —o Sent To ATTN: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST street,Al Oregon Dept. of Land Conservation & Devel 635 Capital Street NE, Suite 150 p City,star Salem, OR 97301-2540 1 See Reverse for Instructions PS Form 3800.May 2000 iSENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY I • Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Received by(Please Print Clearly) B. Date of Delivery item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. • • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. C. Si. ature r • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, ❑Agent or on the front if space permits. d■ J • Ak21:1••r- •e D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes 1. Article Addressed to: If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑ No ATTN: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST. Oregon Dept. of Land Conservation & Devel .635 Capital Street NE, Suite 150 3. Service Type (Salem, OR 97301-2540 Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail 1r ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) 0 Yes fi 2. Article -/qm service label 4L.j(.` 7 0007 (0/C wW , / e o PS Form 3811,July 1999' Cf✓1 Domestic Return Receipt 'L11` C/ 102595.00-M-0952