Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
MLP2001-00014
1\1\ L? 2DON0004 ,116 �l -•I I! CITY OF TIOARD Community'Development ShapingA Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 4/11/2002 FILE NO.: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2001-00014 FILE TITLE: PASSMORE PARTITION APPLICANT: Charles H. Martin OWNER: Hampton PT LLC Hampton PT Profit Sharing Trust By Thomas Fisher 944 SE Sellwood Blvd. PO Box 11370 Portland, OR 97202 Portland, OR 97211 PHONE/FAX: 503-236-3895 REQUEST: A request to Partition one existing lot of 0.42 acres into two (2) parcels of 7,509 and 8,023 square feet. An existing single-family dwelling exists on the subject parcel. However, the existing dwelling will be on proposed parcel #1 and will meet all applicable setbacks of the base zone. LOCATION: 11370 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2101. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters: 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, CRITERIA: 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. CIT AREA: Central CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ® TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: DECEMBER 14, 2001 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: DECEMBER 28, 2001 ❑HEARINGS OFFICER [MONJ .DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ❑PLANNING COMMISSION [MONJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 1:30 PM ❑CITY COUNCIL [TUESJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 1:30 PM ®STAFF DECISION [TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: JANUARY 10, 2002 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION ® VICINITY MAP ® TREE PROTECTION PLAN El ARBORIST REPORT ® SITE PLAN ® UTILITY PLAN ❑ TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ® NARRATIVE ® GRADING PLANS ® OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner (503) 639-4171. Ext. 317 • , t . !,1 • • Community Development - .. . ,„.- -.....,. WILL CALL /PICK UP TIGARD . . . , \ , , IFill out this form completely and attach it securely to the docfmnt(s). Bring it to the WILL CALL/PICK UP . ..-- ) area ..-the Permit Center Counter and file alphabetically by - last name of ndividual or company name. ! TO: V.c..i"c 6 - r . FROM: to L4d4 t/, '1- t'- .. 'DEPARTMENT: CD• • 7 1 ?)(06) DATE TO WILL CALL: I . FEES DUE: ..... . .. . ATTACH FEE INFORMATION(ACCOUNTS,PERMITS,COPIES,ETC.) 1 Doc,-"ent will be returned to the originator if not picked up . . witl business days of the"DATE TO WILL CALL". t . I RECEIVED BY: I MUST BE SIGNED BY THE PERSON LISTED ABOVE RECEIVED DATE: • ,• RETURNED TO ORIGINATOR DATE: . .: I I:\13uilding\Forms\RteSlip-WillCall.doc . - ,____-____—_-:_______,, _ ..., ., _ - • — ____ • • BURGESS :FAMILY TRUST U/T/D—12/05/1994;17(EVISED.&AMMENDED 04/13/2000 Board of Trustees TRUST CONTACTS JAMES F. BURGESS, SST FRED J. BURGESS,Trustor (TEL: 503-620-1387) (TEL: 503-694-2545) (CELL: 503-708-4051) (mailing address) ELLEN M. BURNS,TTS BURGESS FAMILY TRUST BARBARA A. HOLDEN,TTS 32399 S.W. LAKE DRIVE Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 TODD PRAGER, ASSOC. PLANNER/ARBORIST • . • CITY OF TIGARD L ` 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD, OR. 97223 OCT 1 5 2008 Thursday, October 09, 2008 l�b .i ,1) SUBJECT: TREE REMOVAL ISSUES AT 11380 SW FONNER ST. TIGARD OR. PASSMORE PARTITION, MLP2001-00014 • DEAR MR. PRAGER: THIS LETTER ACKNOWLEDGES OUR RECEIPT OF YOUR LETTER DATED 10/07/08 AND AMMEND,ED LETTER DATED 10/08/08 CONCERNING TREE REMOVAL ON PROPERTY LISTED IN ABOVE SUBJECT LINE. -BOTH IVII(SQN JIM AND I ACKNOWLEDGE AND ACCEPT YOUR FINAL DETERMINATIONS AND :-:.,:A4 E_GLAD THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN RESOLVED AND DOCUMENTED IN PUBLIC RECORD FOR ,.,'-=FtJTQREREFERENCE. WE ARE ALSO APPRECIATIVE OF THE SENSITIVE, THOROUGH, AND .==PROFESSIONAL MANNER IN WHICH YOU AND MS.CHRISTINE DARNELL CONDUCTED OUR • HEARIPI,G ON 10/03/08. IF WE ENCOUNTER TREE ISSUES ON SAID PROPERTY IN THE FUTURE WE WILL'MAKE SURE WE CONTACT YOU ASAP IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY SITUATION. THANKS TO YOUR PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT WORK I CAN NOW GO BACK TO PLAYING WITH MY TOYS "WESTERN ART AND FIREARMS OF YESTERYEAR" AND PLANNING THE ELK HUNT THAT JIM AND I WILL TAKE IN NOVEMBER, BOTH THINGS THAT AN 83 YEAR OLD NATIVE OREGONIAN CAN ENJOY. THANKS AGAIN FOR HELPING US RESOLVE THIS MATTER. SINCERELY FRED J. BURGESS CC: Christine Damell James F. Burgess U.S. Postal Servicem CERTIFIED MAIL. RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only;No Insurance Coverage Provided) O • For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.comr OFF _ 2 Ln Ln Y P ge $ X0.4 rl V▪ i(..i rtified Fee -,12.70 g. - Postmark' CI Return Receipt Fee 12.2 0 Hereo. O (Endorsement Required) , -, =' . CI Restricted Delivery.Fee J', -d (Endorsement Required) ( �411----4.O ). n.1 Total Postage&Fees $ 5.32 O I _ SeM po rr N o p ,nk""11 l ru�t . Street,Apt No.; !! D or PO Box No. 3y5 7 s w Luke, prig N City,State,ZIP+4 imzTSonv`..,, ol\ d17o70 PS Form 3800,August 2006 See Reverse tor Instructions l SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY t • Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Signatur: 1 X item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. —i 0 Agent l • Print your name and address on the reverse tali' 0 Addressee _ B so that we can return the card to you. B. Received by(Prin.=•Name) C. Date of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1, Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? 0 Yes r If YES,enter delivery address below: 0 No ' /5/7/55 )'µ^' /�T tist - , `3e 3y7 SwL..kc °nit k l I 3. Service Type ',ho,r)✓:lle ) a f 9742 70 EYCertified Mail ❑Express Mail 0 Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise li I 0 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D. i 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) 0 Yes , 2. Article Number ,1 (Transfer from servicelabef) • , 1 �; 7007 0220 0001 ;,5565..2004 1 l I PS Form 3811,February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-o2-M-1540 Cit y of Tigard, Oregon 0 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigara R 97223 October 8, 2008 T I �AR ti, D�r Burgess Family Trust 32399 SW Lake Drive Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 RE: Tree Removal at 11380 SW Fonner Street/Passmore Partition (MLP2001-00014) Dear Burgess Family Trust: As a result of additional photographic evidence you provided on October 8, 2008, the City of Tigard has determined that the 22-inch diameter Douglas-fir at 11380 SW Fonner Street was removed due to hazardous condition. Therefore, the Douglas-fir will not be subject to the mitigation fees stated in the letter that was sent to you on October 7, 2008. Please note that any tree listed as "save" in the Passmore Partition tree plan shall be removed only if it is determined dead or hazardous according to a certified arborist, and the City is provided with supporting documentation. Alternatively, any tree listed as "remove"in the tree plan,including the 24-inch diameter cherry, does not require permission from the City prior to removal. Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions regarding this correspondence. Sincerely, Todd Prager o g City of Tigard Associate Planner/Arborist Cc: Christine Darnell, Code Enforcement Officer Enclosure: Excerpts from the tree protection plan for 11380 SW Fonner Street/Passmore Partition (MLP2001-00014) Phone: 503.639.4171 • Fax: 503.684.7297 • www.tigard-or.gov • TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 S a Sent By: HP Laser Jet 3100; 5032396133; Nov-91A1 11:26PM; Page 3 11/09/2081. 6711 503774793.. . COLLIER ARBOR CARL PAGE 02 . • kl ; .• ' , .M art i rill'r e e Ikepo rt : ' . , Paget of 4 • • 03 • . • . .• . . . . r; . :: • • • • ..•..,. . : ,.• , TREE INVENTORY .. . •;.., , . . • . ' RI • I •. . . • . . ' The falewing 13 trecasklv.r 12-inches in diameter;Note: identified by species, measured for trtfpc diAmeter, visually rated for crown condition, and recommended for'either remOil or pieservatioh:(1table#1).Tree diameter warneasure.d at 4.5-feet above grade • unlesseted because ci.t Inpltiple trunks. If the tree had multiple'trunks it was tryeasured ' belowAhe foik. The eortdition of the trees was rated by good, fair, and poor assessments adcordttg.to he followiddidefinitions. • , 4-4 • 4 .• .. .i, . . . • ii .: : •tcGood-trunk and crown have no significant problems observed, and growth rate is • ' • ' •Fit-orrn41: . . , . . . . . . . - • gri: . E .:• : . .Vair..1tome truiik and crown problems observed; growth rate reduced. ' • • 111 :'- : • • • • , • . . • trPp or-.,/.signifibant titunk and crown problems obiervd that limits life span and is a • Raigh tiazard potential for failure.Growth rate is poor. . . • • 0, , . • • . - P f: . •- • ' . ' TABLE PI . • . • t. ; . . , 1 : • -- — . . • ' skies ; ----15r"---. 1141. 'ter" Condition Action Comment .• . • 'Er' ' , inChes • ., - . . • :nogglas fit ;:35:, Good : Save . .. . . Dollas fi t '°. .8',' Good , • Save • . : 1Do • lits ft ..,40i, Good : Save • 2-trunks- • • . • ' —"D'011•ras fit :22: . Good ' : Save • -- -,-- • DO Es fif • ' . 23; Good ' •: Save • . - . • Do 1-44 fil; :30i Good Save . • ._ . . • Dog las 0 737 Good : Save ' • , . • •Do ' las fil ..34 Good . Save . — - ..,...- • _ . . ,4,..=: .4 . •- • • Under•34"fir, • • Willow • •25 . Fair . , . Save . • • • 4..%•.1. , •• deadwood in crown . • 1. .•-• , . . . • ' •Ihe .. •1•l.3; -Good '_Remove . Mru cr si ;near house . • lerry i ..: 4• • Good .. a:move 4-t1-unks,near °Use ' . .• • • • -iirrph :1 .:20 Fair Remove . In driveway • 0.. . ra ! • .....:11: Fair. Itemove In driveway - - • • ... iota • .34 • • . • : : • M ! • • . ' ; . qs 7 . • . it ° • •:. • . • . • • ' ' . 10 . . . • : TREE INVENTORY SUMMARY . • •q: 1 . . • IN ,i • • * pi • 3 0..: . . . • • Of tht41 trees,four alt.:recommended for removal due to probable consttuction conflicts • . and nOd ar&recommOided for preservation. The total diameter inches of the removed . • . • • . . trees *ale 75 inches;.the total diameter inches of the preserved trees equals 274. The . . • .. total crn tfietett•of all 13 ':tieCs is 349 inches. .• , • . . . • . . . 1 l'' i . • • .. . . . • 1 . ' . . . . . . 1;1; '• . . . • . . • • . . . Alf • 14 .. .. . . . • ... • • . 6 Cattier AAor Care,ilic,: •' 0 . , 11/9/2001 • . • / . .7.! •_ . . . t :: • . . i • • ; . . • . • . : • : . . t ": • • . •• • . • . , . ; . . . . . . . . • • Sent By HP Laser Jet 3100; 5032396133; Nov-9-01 11 :27PM; . la Page 6/8 11/09/2001. 07041 .:. 50377479.:, : COLLIER ARBOR OAR! . PAGE 05 1; . . : : . . • Appe!4i.#1 Ore Plan I: : oft: ' - . • • ketalt tee Reort infi' Page I fA• - ,:—....—,..........: . . . ...I.J. :::,!z • . 4 14 • F •.:: • ', • 111) ' e (E...) -45-1T2' • ipp - 3v: v- i 0,... i ; 1:7•P•31" 1 bFlon .....,. ,._. . :g .. . PO . • Ar' IA 4 .. !:•••/.1f.L., _••2 .'. oe e,..."..r,- ) g / : t . •::, ; .......,-,. • :...r— -- — ': — — — - - — — . DF(- k • •Vif -': I • . . I . /4 . : ; • . • . • f, 1 . $ ... ) .. . • . . ig: t ,...,`'• 0.• • • . • li . .. . .. • r......4• rikt..-. ?.13- • 7. I .\_ 1 • tr,.! , r- ....., ig., .. • • gt : •• • 0 13'1 • '44: • •• • `..::‘ iZ' AO+.1•R Pro'jected.I ko,,/ • •X9. r"..Ai;•rri-. 7:k • i..- t . q .. • c-s3 7 • . • t• ;-.... > • ( ILID A -'11... 14••••1) C..)Af tAt I i•t.:'! , • :. .• a. . • f-../1•,.-iip- - r• . 7. • • .. . . • 4":. .. LI6 1 • •1 ti.,'• . 4---: - --. ."- .•-•-• • 71".." - ---' . • 41.. • E • / • k . : . • • it c i g i . ' . • • nt,,,, : i • • :, : . . : • • • 1 .ti' . ..• i . ■ g3 :d • 30, st ,•:.: . :: . . . .,,t..; . . FE• . . . . . N s . • fiAi- I f>3.; • ": . • I .. ,,,..t. • (.... Ii" ( . . . . • . • ....... • a. , . • 'ai.,., • • : . • ; . • : 1 • 1 - • ; . . . . . . , . econierAV rbor dare,Inc - . s.l. • so 11/9/01 . g , . . • . ' • 1 . i-. '..1 . • : R.: • i .i • . •• a : , :..! ; . . ...,.. „......„ .... '•• • •:.. . ,..„.,,,..,..,,il!.......J.1:::.1!... ' ....]:,."..f.;•.:•...."..,,•••f p,,,,"7 .4... .4..li...kt*:;.."1"It".7 ....1::.**N.1":"...... ". !.... i'l.?•"'''. . •:•"*.i."."-"i4....1•:,.,..1„"i",t'...:::.,''`,..i'47,,,;.tit,i.....',.:—41.PT,:14.'......•. .-",•,'.....:4"*:";:••'*•11..' ' ...: ...4".!..."..,"•,..,i,s?;:"..i,i4":.* * -,?.....''...c:.'":'.6V.......;;...441k ' 15..Vi•i*••":;•A4,4.••1:.;•.......P.',.....,..*-. •-..ciod-4, if.",.....*!•.:: ••••... i „.....?,...!.,........f........5.....,„...&,....;,„•••:,...,;:,..,,......4?-4.: .41...i. ..........,1,.., .....• .,•:..:•. ..*.i.*.4,44. .,f; ,iy.; * ,4 i...,.:,,,,,t. r..t• '.. l• ....,:.:::.•,,...„: , 4 ' —• ..... * ***;'''' '. . ...?..*:. .. ' ..'' :**7" .1., :"....t14...% . .• — * .. .4 ,N.V:41'.....4::::•••• '''':•77:7...,„.....h.,•r,.......iff,:i,.....:::••*'•••‘ '' '.4 ..• .•••••••' • .,41'. 41 *** •—'. ......, .....i,if,..,...• :1:14:14.1*.:••.*n ....i... ..'..1".....,..S.Iili.. . „;.• ,• , ......,. . •.•tl•if.......-—........ ..„,„„:• '..•:•„41......?..1.4... ..,..1.....,..„ .. .„ ..r...„- ............. ..:„. .• .,„.4'.: ., • , ..,.„,,,• „ •• • i• k-4 S ‘‘ '.. • ;,;4....,_.. 1 ' i 11. •... • ,...........T, ........... • Todd Prager From: Todd Prager Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 3:05 PM To: 'Pierre Gohier' Cc: 'Patty Gohier Subject: RE: Trees on Burgess lot Yes. I sent a letter to the owner on 9/23/08 requesting documentation that the trees were removed due to hazard or payment of $5,875 in mitigation fees for removing the 25-inch willow and 22-inch fir. The owner then requested a meeting to discuss the issue, so on 10/3, the owner, Tigard's Code Enforcement Officer, and I met here at City Hall. At the October 3rd meeting, the owner provided photographic evidence that demonstrated the willow was split and unbalanced due to the loss of a large portion of its canopy structure. Based on the photo, I determined that there was enough evidence to suggest the willow was removed due to hazard, and waived that portion of the mitigation requirement. However, the owner was unable to prove the fir was removed due to hazard, and could not provide me documentation from a certified arborist testifying that it was removed due to hazard. Therefore, the mitigation fee for the 22-inch fir was upheld. I sent the owner a revised letter today requiring a mitigation fee of $2,750 (22 inches removed x $125/inch mitigation fee) on or before October 28, 2008. Thanks, Todd Original Message From Pierre Gohier [mailto:prgohier @hotmail.com] Sent: T day, October 07, 2008 2:37 PM To: Todd P .ger Cc: 'Patty G.'ier' Subject: RE: Tees on Burgess lot Todd, I was wondering if yo. have had any updates from the arborist about the trees on the Burgess property. Please let me know. Thanks, Pierre Original Message From: Todd Prager [mailto:todd@tigard .gov] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 9:12 To: 'Pierre Gohier' Subject: RE: Trees on Burgess lot Yes. But if a tree is removed because it dies or i azardous, it is exempt from penalties. This is why I am working with Mr. Burgess and his arbo .st to determine when and why the trees were removed. In my experiences, when removal occu • in a selective manner (i.e. one tree removed from a group) it is usually because a tree die. or became hazardous. I want to be careful not to jump to conclusions before I have all of the 'nformation. I will keep you informed as I know more. • • October 7, 2008 Burgess Family Trust 32399 SW Lake Drive Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 RE: Tree Removal at 11380 SW Fonner Street/Passmore Partition (MLP2001-00014) Dear Burgess Family Trust: As a result of photographic evidence you provided on October 3,2008, the City of Tigard has determined that the 25-inch diameter willow at 11380 SW Fonner Street was removed due to hazardous condition. Therefore, the willow will not be subject to the mitigation fees stated in the letter that was sent to you on September 23, 2008. However, there was insufficient evidence provided to suggest that the 22-inch diameter fir was removed due to hazard. As a result, the fir will be subject to a mitigation fee of$2,750 (22 diameter inches removed x $125/inch mitigation fee). Please provide the City with the required mitigation fee of$2,750 on or before October 28, 2008 in order to avoid a citation by Tigard's Code Enforcement Officer. Finally,please note that any tree listed as "save"in the Passmore Partition tree plan shall be removed only if it is determined dead or hazardous according to a certified arborist,and the City is provided with supporting documentation. Alternatively, any tree listed as "remove"in the tree plan,including the 24-inch diameter cherry, does not require permission from the City prior to removal. Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions regarding this correspondence. Sincerely, Todd Prager City of Tigard Associate Planner/Arborist Cc: Christine Darnell, Code Enforcement Officer Enclosure: Excerpts from the tree protection plan for 11380 SW Fonner Street/Passmore Partition (MLP2001-00014) • • Sent By: HP LaserJet 3100; 5032396133; Nov-9-01 11 :26PM; Page 3 11/09/2081. 07:;x1 :503774793_ COLLIER ARBOR CARE PAGE 02• Martirs1'ree k;sport Paget of 4 .' TREE INVENTORY •• • The fcitlowing 13 trees:over 12-inches in diameter wore: identified by species, measured for tri jk diarnetex, visually rated for crown condition, and recommended for 'either remov ar pieservatibi•('Table#1). Tree diameter was•.measured at 4.5-feet above grade • uniessAioted because oi'tin iltiple,trunks. If the tree had multiple trunks it was measured belowi'i .o folk. The condition of'the trees was rated by good, 'fair, and poor assessments . accordig,to the following definitions. • , • Wood trunk rid a :crown have no significant problems observed,,and growth rate is • normal: j • '4:#air-;",some trunk tod crown problems observed; growth rate reduced. ' 43eor 4 signifbarit trunk and crown problems observed that limits life span and is a high.t azard•potential for failure. Growth rate is poor. • • 1! .. • 'TABLE#1• ' • • • t . Diaa .0.er- S ies S ' inches Condition Action Cornnjenits • ' • :Doujfas fix :35: Good : Save . ' • , . Do1as flit `.28 c Good . • Save • Do itl s fit :•40 Good : Save • 2-trunks• • oy las fib .22 . Good • Save • • Do>�fas fif • ' . 23 Good • Save . • • Do fas 30 Good , Save . • Doti las fit' 37 Good : Save •• •Do . las fit ..34 Good . Save , . Under•34"fir, :111ow - •25 • Fair . , . Save fleadwood in crowzt • . . • • "';•ple .r .:'a.3 -Good Remove . , 4-trunks; near house . •,,erry .•: g4:: • Good emove 4-trunks, near Ouse ' larch < .:20. fair Remove . In driveway .. lira - ..•18 Fair' Remove In driveway• . lintel • 349 , •. t.. . •• .• . . • •: • kx,.: i : : *TREE INVENTORY SUMMARY 0 • • Of th "k13 trees,four are re.commended for removal due to probable constriction conflicts • • . and n#0 are;recoininet dc'd for preservation. The total diameter inches of the removed • trees okuals 15 inches;The total diameter niches of the preserved trees equals 274. The • • total dametei of a11'13"trees is 349 inches. . • • • • N ' I • • ' _ . • f . / ©Co&'icx A.4-or Care,;sac:! •• • 11/9/2001 Sent By:. HP LaserJet 3100; 5032396133; Nov-9-C1 11:27PM; Page 6/8 11/09/2001: 07;?41 503774783 COLLIEF ARBOR CARL. PAGE 05 Rppenl' z#L''1 Sete Plan Page 1 of 1 Niactin; reeRe�ort 5'v' ' _ N ;i Or .. .34s: 4/ ` fir6, uT I 0P•37" � bF•30^ o�' 4'-' iii :,II' of 'ate Ci; • L Gina N ' -n ++Ve.• fay'••• n I` I v'S zI I i` ^^ 13'i • • Z. •o A1t11 }wf •R Ctb•J ec'teal hDVS� s1. n.1.1 i•Ir4-. f • J. Av.tc c 1 ( I6oA -r . r4, 0 I 5/..4-1•44.t y; 2 . t: L _ _ _ 7 - 3o, s 3 1 • :g: • • 6 F • ez . fit . i ©Collier rbor Care,Inc 11/9/01• • .0,* - 7'"'...'..:. ' .........'. .. •••;•••••.. ... ,•••-.- . . . • . •••••••••.• .• , •4 * • . .46, . • ., io..... . ...,*. '. . iilif,.4.,=, . 4000e,1.40.,.. .,...... . ,.,4 .. ....- ,,,,,ifitto... ... . t ..... , • • .)..• .• . .....,,,,,, .4...!,•,.., 4, 10,... .. . .. . . : . ....• 4 - '••••••••... i4.••f .174.'1.• ' ;'' • •••••••'. a .* '*''*. • 4. ••*•** 4'•:• •• •'• •..‘. *t #' -.'•,•••'.44..;'•''..Y.' ..*** ..44 *******•1:: '... '....1'..!.... I z •• .. .../. . . = , . i . • 's • i , - •• .. 0....'' • 4 %'. • * At ...> • 4 * of zz414• 44. V'. . '• z.1 • • * ...... zzlz • . • .4, • •Zz I • ..z. T ''..4.• 4 4 *14: . .•... .: 4..i....4 44..••--'.- • ..• ' •- 4- ZI• - i•• ''"*. . .1*!. . .t.- . ••••.- a i..-..••••• .'••••''-"* .'}i: .4.''... .:.1... an .. .1..,.'4..i.i.........4:MF..,0.4,,.. . .r... 0 ....... .! It >!...,''11' r ., .... ...- ,.......,. . —77.. .. .. .- -. -,,... . ,---..... ---,.!... ... ....!i...,...: ......LE ,,,,,,„.............. .. .... .0/..W. : .1.-- , PN1/4, L.d.'.....,,,,,, ........ ..., . . . . ....... ..,..„... ....................... - 034 - i , . ... . .. ........:... .. .. .. : .. .. ... „ , -1 ..,..,-..,... ... _ .......• ,..: .,..1 '4 - ...•..'''''...''..... .... .............''......'1'''"'.. ...--... i 4 .••••• ....................'''''''''''''''''' 0....4 '....... .47".4".-- ...... ... . .. . ............44..k....... ..........4. . ... ...144,144•••,- .- . • ' • .1•••.....••-••'....:..••••-:•••••••.:!:triee-!...1:.:.'::-.44'.... ... ..4%''P4$4.%,.- .....4. .......:',.•.' ' • ' " • •''...'.:*****:•••••144:64..4r'•1.*::*'Ili.1.414001410* _ • ..... .... ... . .. .. _ ... .. ,• , „....;. ... .... ••zzi..** . ....**.*".....;•*•.• -.--4i.„•.-•-•• • • •- ..,:,......f...., --• ..........-...•-,... ---• -• ----?.. '•.'..••••••••1...4•••••:••••••rilaRA .....4•''''•••••••••••••• •• - ••••-.,..#•••••••-......444... .......„4• - .., •••••••••••••.:0•••• S - •- ••••:'ii•••••••••••••::::::::, Ift , ., .:....,:;.:.....:.....4::::.„;::„:. ..:.;:.„•••••'''....,•:::::::•••••••;•:•iiiiii•f•iii;.;.:riirli::::..... ::: ..:::::.,:i1::..:'... '„..!....T. ....••• ..........,......:r••••••••:.••••••••00 ..... ..8:0. !::::;,..:;•...„110,1,...,.."' 11:+li:::•••: . iir":•:::::::. ...:•::• .411!SP.:::...::::.1.1 .. ...11: .4.:111_,„„e!P'... .1::„„i••, ••••..i;:ig•17::;A:,.-...•._,.;...:!'...:•i!!'..."•?'::::#41r...:.••.. e11.::: :::g ::::;;;;1•::'1.:.::..„!:::::.::::.iiililli:".:3:::tilicli.::: ..4.1.••••••••- .. • •••!4t!...: •' ••M''.:•••;:::,:.iiii. ...''''...-•,.:: -:!":"::.1. ...:::::::::::.:11.:71.::F0:5;:iiie:':.....•:.:::i47:....:::--::::,..:.... :...i..!::...filii!...::iii.11igHlikr.io.:....,1!1•.:••••••••....' •.-.1•••••••••:•,:•••••.''''''.:-"'"'•••••••m••I.."'•• t..... ..07,.. -......!°•-i'..:.':::.:•:•:::liAliMik:::•:i!.F.E$104".: . :::i.'ll.'. - ..i.i....i....::::•.:•.:••..:.4'...:•.•::.:•....•.,1.1.-:::.:I.,..-..'•.••••.•-.-.•..,•I•:•,,..•.:•i••tt.....,!+...•.......!:.!!:•:..:4.•,:,:.:.,••I••P•I...:•::.:.•,•...-.:.;...:}..4....1.B•... .....i..c:i.4:..i4::i'.::,::'•:::!••::•••:i.'1'1:'.:'•.:.•:.:•':•.'.:-,''•••.'•.''••'••„••„',••..••:.'.'.....f...,.:.•,..,.:,,.!,.•.•..•.....,..:.....:_'„„'.1.4.:-:.:'i.:.„:..*::i::::h:4,,:•:,:,,i••4..••..•:4 1.7•,.'iin•.i•m•••.,•:e•*:.,,:!.:..e..'.!,•.,,•:"fr:.i..l:$......1_7!4.!"„'....I..:-...V--;'..•:'.;•...•:.. O: t:•:'„..:i.•.•.::.:•.:•.::.:.i!:,19...'11k.:.•.••..:'1::':::r..'...f...:..1-.•i:m••g••.:::•.:,.:.:.4 1-0 1i.::...1.••..•..,..-.:k..-:1„.:7.:.1::;..:::.!:::•:::•::„!T„::.•:.i••..:.i•1.:....i•:•i••i0•.::••::••:!:•"!•••••..•••••••.•••..•••:.•.•::„1•:::::+,:::::::(1:::.:.:•:"•1:,,,1ii1.i::.•'•.•..••1k 1 : 44.7:1,.t 4:.::!4::;.:,.".d''....•..:„...:.:::':..::74„::::::,.:::..:.1..„:•!:4....::i'0i'::::1.:..::17:.:::.::'•;1.:•1;.:•!•!i••:l:'i::•:1 $; •••: 1•••''-.......•'.:••!••.:••••.:•....:'.:•'• ..:•. .iel',...:::.71.,::*14iiit,;;::::::::-..r. ..o..:::-..::::::......:::.: .. ..1:11r... ••••••::::::•••••,:•••••••ti•:1'.P.•:•..••••••iii......•••••' .. • ..,.. •••......:„.••••::: •••••••••• ,:•..,• ....,.. ::••...hilia:-6,0%.,,a.re.. . '1.:":::::.::::::.:7::.:5iAk•...F::::;det, :::11!,-.:•.':' ..'......• •••''''‘.....-•4`....•••• ....:•••••••.7 • '.' • , • m m• ,,,, , , ::::• ..T•J`ii•lifi,..:1„1„_„.. m......{11.1..!'„;::....:••••40::::•.' "k... .:•••••::x.4.••••;••,'t•..... :••••:••••:;::;:ii:4i1440:7•:::::::::-.. .• . • .:'•:::.•::N"':4' •:'.:10.• ••+.."1...... •• • -....• „••'.. •• ..' ....:•'....M ..,....i..,•:',.. ' .. •::.igiitiiii.„.• „...„:„.....--.g••• 41... Jo: . . .4 ...:1:•.:!.....";,.' .46: .•••!...4 .4::. ..:.:3.:k::•::,.....40Aiii- 644:•,:c.:.: ,14•'...•....,....:...1.•Hi:,:: .•"iii....... • :: tr. ..i.:::::::4;!•••:,:::::::...... .:...........:.11s .••:::::::::::414 .• ,,v., ... „„.....,.... .....:•••-: :: ,,„. :,.,..4.. ,.1.•... .i.1,i.,.......i....•• -Li!. ..4:.... . 4... •..:•.• : .., .......,...... . ..:::: ... _....,,,..,... .. ••••••.41.... . 11,...;•;••.:. • ..:*.it.T....• ... . -.. ';• .• •:.:T.I.••••• .••:::.:.••••••:.• L 4.1: •••••:... .:'!„,.... V:I,1:'...' ...... •:•.: • ••••••• ••••••••••••••..•11•1•1•N'::::::„..144`......••::::1•••••,•74.7....,..,.... ;:,.,.,J.::• •1:::". •t.4':•: ...4'•• 1110::::::::::14k•::‘••...:•1;::::i.•... ••It....'''4,1:;:.Z.:::".71:+1::;h1-.••:•i. ....;iii!..•••1;:30*:i. .1..4..f. '•It ••j-. :::;:::- •:.00k•.0, j."1:' •::!Iliti;;;.i;i:li1`'...t'`141....°•.::::/f.....1.'tlill*. •;,::::::1:.•+..,:.•..:::•!ii:::• :I .:::..•,,iiti...41itigui:.;,..04'• l'.."••••: '•••.' '' :ZIA'4.: ;•••.•'J.:.••••• .!MIRIK::•:.: yuL......:•'::::::.:4i.::...:::..., • •••• ....::::*.•!': '+` .::'......• ;.+Ili:........!...• •!1.1.1•1 ',........!. • 'N.i !••10•6`1;•'....;1::::::: iii:..0:!•'..!1:i4..qi,...•'• .,..' 4.'0.:•1 . 7.4# ,.:-.; -7N:":7fr.':: 77ti,.::: •:7117:•::-.......:111 •N•t.!': :11:- 1:•••,::::::•••••••1::::•::' „::.•••••:. . ...:1c.:'''''•1"''''"'Fikiill•,....1•..4.'• :I'll. ....: '::•1::•:•::: :•:,. 1, •.1.:.::...! '4.'''''....' '7;0!!,11ritig":•711,%:::.31,.....::.;.:e.:•'i.,.,_ Ift_.:.:1;411:%;e1......:•:i.:•••1 .1..:"..i.1;:i- • ! •'''..i. J .11:: .::,•••1. '..iiiiii'•.fi' .1:„..,.....„,:•••..i15..1...„,,,,,, ,..„....',„, Awl-,,,,,... :•••. ,!...47,'41',...,,,,,..!:::::::::.:.. !::,.:::::::•!%::h::•..7::::,::: ,•,:.•,....•••••••••••*4*., N......:....:•:•!:.:.1.2!1.6117•11Mglilliii:112':::.::::...... 1.14;4' .iiiii,:''•. !'••••17!••••••,:i.•::171 .,.:....',,,,,.. % I•k•:1111.1::•.. • :41. . •'kl. '...•••••••••• • 1••••' ,,ij••••"4,44444, .4.1:!,..,,•••'.:•.:•,. * '..':'.....'•":.i.•114:illril!,:i,Pfathkii•••!'01.'"%''".7-..:.I.:. •••1:ii ' •.0....1`: .!••••••••••••••1..1::.•;•• • •'•••i: 1•1•:!,..ki•i'i *•••. ••'••.' •••''... .,,. "414:'.'•••'•••41'!1•1.:••.L.iii....:,...,... "........:::::••• ........ ...„„:„....„:IN:..T•:•:;i...••••::::11:::•.,:';•••..Aft.72.:.::....":.+::::::•,... ..:.. ..:::::ii•:.,:.': : .......fr•,.-...). .. ' • 4,,,,iii7r5,011::.•„:4...,••-: ............-....•• __.,...41,,....1%•:?:•"' •.' '11....11:1::::: .-'I:::::+1'''....iiiiti .....::::!.....;:r.„...iii;:.. . .......;,)..' ... ::. •. %.,,..,.... 'I:n.1'111:iii..... .4041....."4!*t4'.ittli...,........,..„:,,mq.......=i:::::'''':.:,,,,...iii iii:.:'19.:::. • 44.-•:::,1:::14•.': T.:if::: •; :.''''' •ir'. .., • :::!F t ,#':•,::..i.::1§... .• '....:...:..:m11;J:,'..: •• '.: it:. ....., • '..I. ,, '''!:::::. •: .'11'..i*k ;1 ::i;:.::•:•. ..':::4;••••••••?•"•'••*41A : • ::1'.11k..i..:i.V1.1111!:::11P:'•,......:.1,:::.::!!.:•:.!:+'...!!....•;••••''••'+'• .'J. • :.: ,:":„.11:.:::.:-••:••••5:::" 1".:•.: '. ::. i ..:. !."1:1:11 ••'5:: , .:::. . ........ '. ,...•:::+iiii.114...*:.:„:1-. -Ft'..,..••...••%••••••!!!'ili.N.:;:::::1. ........':::..: 44 :::ii, '4'4. .•+. 1::• 1:::•41::-. • .:. •:::.• "" :' ..:......- . .14.•!.....• :::::iii; i: ••.. ,.•'..p.....i.,•,.••••• %.: .•.. • ' •.•:•.•:....:.:-:::::•::4:::: - •'•'.........1:::- • .1:•,..... . m. i.• ...:.:.....:......: ...ii • •• .. -.......,................7..f.•....:: •.... •-• .: :ii. • .' l!..i:i.:.:.:"Irei:liiiiill '''.'1...i.........iii' .:: ...........,:,:::::::•:4o. .ii.ii.....i.::. 17...,:,...!:•.; ;H!,.,...rk.*."•:::::...:::.....,,........eiiiiiiim*,.. :::. .:::.......::! •...!..'ii.....,r1:::::::::::::: •••:::•••....... • ...•.....7:'......::::...:,••••••••••••••,,•:..:...........,::::::::::::::e:::::::::lik ::. ,..: ::::•,,:::.• wh........................*•••••,..•::::,,,,,!••••••••••"!...i.•••••••••••:.::::•;•;::::1111::::::::•• :::::::::::: ..:.::::,::,::::::: •.:,, :.:.::::::•:",,••:::::: :41:::,„i........ .::::::::::::, :.::::.:1:i.i.:.::.:::.:::.•,:,:.,:::......:•........"••:•. • . :. .•:! . ..•••. ...:......::•••••••;:::,...,.:.:... . •:.:::•.:.:•• .:::...:::•:...:.:•:::„::::.kli:..,::......,i, .....: .. issworr. ...:. •• . .• %C.a.:: .::.:•....n.:. ::::! ... ..,''....t......•.......;!' ' Iii1.1 :::;.:.,..::•:::.:....:....;.;:i...::;'W:. L::011::::::....: 3::':I• A:7.•;;;i::::::::...;;:79::.:::::::71::: •.. •:i:...i::::::::.••:...,:•:::::::.:7e.•::::1 ,..:_:•:••••1 •.... . • :....+:::::::::..:•71::::::::::•.•.k;•::::Iiiiim •• _11,:171 r:.::•::::::::::::.:•1iFfik:...,:•:..::... ;:11:•• • .........:: ...1". .••••:•.•:••••••.t.ii:i• ...... Atit:•• •'::. !:•:••••:ia:!::::::;..::i:•;:•ili..:::.1:11:2:!.91 .4.• ..:77:::!.:.: ... • :.:47-Aig,,,,,,:„:7 :::1•::::::::.4::::.1.firME!7'....:;14. •..:: •:7::::::::::710:::::....... .... • .... ...::::::::•1:..„::i•:::::!:::•:•: :::!:.•::::0:::.•,.:. .:.:•;.:7:617:71:0::::.::::774::::::7:).::.:7::..:: A:1! i:;:0::::i•:::::: e:AtFilli.:11i.:::1111:411.. :•Ii7.1P.1:::::::::::11.wissong• %:::::::1111111:::::::. 1:::::Ar•L f.:,.: :::-...::Iiiiinlijaill;5iinii.:,i'7 .4.17::::, .,,•,•,•1,... 1.........11„,!•'...1:11111 .:4:7::....:11i1:710211•::::::::.••':!:•1:,:::::.::::::::. ....•:.:::. . 4:. . ....i:Li. 4...: ......:::::„...............: ::}.0:::•:.N....:"".7'"•'•::•:::::: :. -:':::. :„::: - ::.:, :::::.: • .....iiii::::::iiiii:.111:0.::::::::;„ii .. • ....• •„,„,d.....••••••:1,...':!:,104•••,0:.." N:F::::.::::::.:....:::::. •.:.: •:, 7 .. ..". I: ••:11!,.• •:::0106.247,1E.:. .......: ••••••••1::::::::::::::••••••••:::+0... • ......:::::: •••:, :•:•,...........'. .-....ii :••ir:*,'•:'"...:.!::::::Illi.i.:::::::::PCIir ;.. . .:::.' .:::,•.::":: ••• ::1:.,. .,,.., •••...,:,:::::An::.:.•:::.„,, I;:::,m1 ..1,,,,„:::::iiiiti.1::::::::•:„••••• :......• . ••••••:;.74:',:,, , .:::::#••:::7::: r'.*:::::::111iii.:::::::::::11:::ii;.::::AN.9': ••••••$::::::111!!;4•11::••••••::............;,:i...... %L. • •:•ri. ::•••••••••• .10 ..•••••••••••••. „...1.111 Ili; :•:::..::!::!:!!!.. ..•. • ::. . .:.:.:,..,,,let 4.: ,:pri...•• ••.,!.....,,:•;:i.11::::::+1:•••:::::::::::.:••:inith: .....'1'.... : ••.'... 'ili.......'....... .....• t :.41•••••• ....I . . i::::::::: •4"...... •:::01:: • .il•211::iliIIT!!!:::::....:11::•:::.!•:k:::".:!:.1 ... .""f'............t.:1111 .....::::::::•:-....::::::iiiiir'ii.''''''':11. :''''..i.ii'fli:•' .*:141%.•••••:, „4.1,....!,•::............: -:::::'.i.:•:„:11:::::::i:::::.• •• • :„..4,. .im":".F•iii.•••••••:...!!!.:,.:::::::.:::. •::. .• ;::!.::..,..:,,....,:il:::::•::•:•?:::17::::77........:•..0!:.:.:Iiii:::.. 111:.:!1:i1::::. .. : ,r, .....,:::::::::::::::::••:::::::..... .•• • ...,........."..•:. ...........,:••••:,...,...... +It- . 1•limiNhe,,,,!m..... . :..,. ,.:::::.. .....,...:::;::::ffp::::::„...:: : . ...„:...•::::,.::::•• k,••:::::::::::::::::: .::•:::::::).:•,,,.: .•'•••...,,,,,::::.:+q,•••••••••::::::::.•••. ••••,..:::::: ,..::.:,...:....::::••••::.,.:•••••:•.N.ui.i;::::::411 ..•:•:, ,r=:.:.:::::::7,....• •::.. : •.....,:,•::,:::::::„,,„:.,.. •::•::, .:...... •: •••••••-•-v", .::::: •••••-•-..:••••,.; ••,..,•,,.....•::::,,,....1 •:.•:::::::::" .... .. .......:::•:: ...,,h„...:...- .....„1::::. ••A....4,,,A . f" •:. ... ..:!:.:4....i :.:... „.:.:.:.:.:::.:::::;..:.!ii401!:;.:.;:::::•:::•• .:......:......i.....:. ..:.. .:.;i.g.::11:::101g.;:4:„....::;.:::. 12111::. .:.:•': 11:::..i:;1....„...•:+1.1.1.11.........1......T m .;iiiij,.....• ....... '+'..:„... ..'..:.:.:.:.".....:::;k:S.:•qh.:':I:. ••:. ...:;:':::.::, ....!iili:ITi..1:•;':: :::::::.:E...• :: *••:gr:•• 4::::::::::::: ,,...:5.. -...:Ni. ' •::•:4.• ..:....:... • . •.: ...:::::;:417'•":.6::::::444:••::::41...,•,.:4•.: . 1 :14: 4:::::::::.:...... •''....0,114.: : • •.........::::::::::.-.....:....-...41::::::::::1•1•..111:::::•:::•'%..••:4E1.:•••;75::::.:...:... ••••%%L.:. :••••• ...: ": •• ..:••:D::::::•:::. 0414"14:::•11:111:bi. •.4 I' '..:141.•••::::FI ••• ::: ...:4,:::::2: ...:1400:•••:::: •::••:::::•::"7 . • ..;:iii::::::41r. .!.:•i•••44., 1.1.1••••••' ,::: . .•.•.:::: •-,-.4.,,,,H4.,.'..;.........7„:,...,::•,:::::::ti.':".::i::••%:::.::::8 . ::::" I •••:"ti!:• 11::..: ..:• • •••••- • ''''.:•:".•:•::::::w. ''•• : ....: 4%::::::•:•';•••:••••'•1:, .1'....:.::::::: "iii11•••ffil efir.:.••,`„ii....::::::::::::::::i.:::.....::......:::::41:4 •-••••••1784.:.i....:1 ,..:.:.:::::::::14:14:::;;;...::::::i1:•::,.... .::::: :::: ...: li:: :-.:••••:.. • • ...: :•..i:,.., :••••;111tr..14.::::••::::•••: ...t..•.!:.:••'i;•:': :::•••• .i111:::::, ..:Iii:::::14#1414404grip,!•.:4,ii,.:,gr....7.„: ........ •:„.:...........:......a.....:,-.• •••• :45::. ..: ...,....:•:• ..•••••::•::::•••••171 ,•,,....11a144;17.74.44:74i•ii1;...i.ii:NR.:::!'••....:.":.• :.•i::::::.:ki :•:.::••••:• • . :. ... $ .-:•• • ::::::•':::::::::::11::151::.••::::::: •• „I.::: • .• .,•:. 4. ..!......:••••::: ... ... . .... ..:....:...........„:”...::•: - • ... . •.•••• • ...: ..:.+.4:„...: • • . flii:•::..::::04•41:: iliP6.•••••M:.:717.::..."::ii.::g:;4:.i!..•;!::.;;c::•.:11::•': ..,1,•1•••''...::.::1'4...*:.::i.V.;...liiii.i.'!•:.: • •••• • -•• Iiiijii.:*::.:.+1,41•••••• iiii:4•IIPI.,:,:ii:• "IiIiiii• •-•::;: • •.., '..... : ..: .. :•••••.ii'...4••.1. ,......., ,::;•441.4'"'Q••.::........::::.41•1!1"'!::::::,••:::: .1:1:1:4:.::::...:1;1.: - •••::11:: • .•::$6,...!!!‘‘...:itt::•:::::ii.'ill .11':::',..„..,..71::16."1:::: .:•:.:::1.::::::.• ... ...::::....:..:... .......:..... .. ..•:,.:::::......:.... :..•,... . ..... . . .....,...i: • :. ' .7.1A„::••••1!:+4'4•:::"Cti•..!•:.'i'.1;V:111•1i ••!.. . :.1:::::::::::::: ::11::::!.:: ::!:..:.. ,.... • :.•:::' .4g..::•:. k •,• :•::•• .•:•••••••••••.:.••••••••11:• .::::::.:0::i.:!,,:• NitiN:k .:*"*4iii.:::••!:'•,::•••• '.•:• 4,. • •.:•:::•:*,...; 2.:•:. .:1A.;:iri;iV.::.Z:NO::1:;%:::''..gi::::::: %A.:: •.' .... it.:.4: IF; ••••.p.1!„igipti• . • .•‘;•••:•...•••••• •...:•••••••!••••: 1:•00 :.:.:::::iii:•••... • .. i r •••••• ••••.:IF••:•%•::.:.. tr.': •••••:11:::::14:1„.:.;:::::i1:11)111„NIC: ,.,:!:!•.'.........:Niir.:::.:::::iii:qii'.......!..•„::!!!:.1.1„•'•• :'•1!"......•:......1.1. :: 141,•."4.::::::;••::!!!!!i!`....;. ...• •• ,.4. •!••.4.....'.1... ...„.:.:....„7:44:•:::„.: .„..,P,t.::•:... .;;: ::: 17••• 4 g:i.i!::•••■••.... ......::::: '';11.':'' . ::..::::::::i1:117:!....iii':::':'.1:11i:0111.:„„„::..:.:4;;;;4...:i:---ii:•'.....:::.::::::::::::•AiN' ,......4.•:!: •*• ......••.. :I.'''. '......V.....f:' •••'.. ..i..".....1.:' . '.'4"• .. .. .. .......... .... „... ....:„.....:......„....:.. ...... •iiiii...1„•:.::..''••••!...!.. .. • ••ii.. 117!:li.•• '......" ii.: ....:1*•;:110:;::.:::!0::::::41.? :• .:: .::'•111:•:'..4:;...4.•: •••..4141:': a: •'. .11111:-..:.:1 ..:. ..:ilii.:i"..:.:. :::::::.••-•••••.tir.:::::• ........t.......:•.t.:11:::•••r.r...7•:••.:•••:,••••••••:• • 1:::,..••••••At!`:••••;.` •lifirdi:::::.....,::!::::::... ::.• .,.. • •.:1,!•••:::.!.:11::::•'.. iii::.•1::::::::...14:. . ••' :•....":••:•::::::•.:,.„:.:....::::::..:.:.•:... :EillimP!!!:'•:,-.! :::::::ii'.... :•. ..P.: .:!.:1:iit:• 1.......4' ••••••'• ••••1 • .••'••••eir"."::::::::•••••••••ii..!......!•:•••••....1••-•.: • • !...4:•!:•,.!:ii.:.:1;1:,1.::..,••••••••:::•94 .,• 1, •••,41.,.........4:::'••'i•.;.',11:„,k•:: :•,.1„:•,...•„.••:••....••••••„111;i:itiii::•••••••...•'•••••••••.'•:...: 11.....• •::::::. •...AC•:;••••::'..':• ..1.. . . ' ..1::......)::..:11:::‘.•;:::titi:::::::::*.:::::;!:::.••••••::::•••••••••••••:1•ii.-•:',1: •..r.' ....i.j••••••••••:'••:ii.::1•!1::::•.....''...irl'i''''''4"...'4..... .•••::::,1:!!!i.....iii.14:• ••':':::.ii.••••••'•....'iki.••:•••-•.:•.....1•:::.!....'..'..i.,...:••••••••„; ....: ..,;iii..........!2.4•1!1.•:' • •••'.......;•1 f••••••••••:::•:4:::...1.••••11.0...: .'••• ::..„..::•:•.:..: ...i,t li.J*4 • it.....:::••••••••••'• ••• ••: iii •• . .......,,, • ►l ����� R Environmentally Friendly...Since 1937 • 11814 SE Jennifer Street, Clackamas, Oregon 97015 • September 30, 2008 Jim Burgess 11350 Fonner Street Tigard, OR 97223 Re: 11380 Fonner Street, Tigard, OR 97223 Mr. Burgess, On September 29, 2008 you and I met to discuss the Cherry tree located in your yard. The topic of discussion was the need for and the process required to obtain a tree removal permit. After examination of the City of Tigard's tree removal requirements, it is apparent that you do not need a tree removal permit for this Cherry tree. This tree does not conform with tree removal requirements listed in municipal code 9.06.070. Thank you, Phil Wich Certified Arborist Portland: 503--22--26- \ancouvcr: 360-693.6056 Fax: 503-23-5531 www.collierarhor.com • • • COLLIER ARBOR CARE, INC. ,..i V ',-I r i. 11'814 SE JENNIFER STREET CLACKAMMAS, OR 97015 COVETER PLEASE PAY FROM THIS INVOICE ARBOR CARE PORTLAND-(503) 722-7267 • ,,,, VANCOUVER-(360) 693-6056 _I", SERVICE DESCRIPTION/RECOMMENDATIONS :, 1 t .. �.r'{.!'l}": !!�!.t:.' 1'7. 11 .ti 1"1:f1'!I`II.f'. •i'1 .1..t.' • • ti KEEP PEOPLE&PETS OFF TREATED AREA FOR_HOURS TERMS—1%PER MONTH ON OVERDUE ACCOUNTS PAYMENT DUE UPON RECEIPT. PEST CONTROL, FERTILIZATION, LAWN AND WEED SERVICES ARE WE ACCEPT VISA/MASTERCARD RENEWED ANNUALLY UNLESS WE ARE NOTIFIED. CHARGE: Vag/ • • LOCATION: ;•°.h, a'1„I-11 s_'..�'i DATE G TIME CUSTOMER COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS �• I WOULD LIKE ONE.OF COLLIER:ARBOR CARE'S PROFESSIONALS TO CALL ME REGARDING: CHARGE INSECT&DISEASE CONTROL ®FERTILIZING TREES&SHRUBS TAX - ®PRUNING LANDSCAPE WEED CONTROL • 0 LAWN CARE 0 CONSULTATION PLEASE REMIT CUSTOMER NAME: ACCOUNT NO. COLLIER.ARBOR CARE, INC. CHECK NO. SEND PAYMENT.TO:, 11814 SE JENNIFER STREET CLACKAMAS, OR 97015 AMOUNT PAID PAYMENT DUE UPON RECEIPT—PLEASE RETURN THIS PORTION WITH YOUR PAYMENT • , . • • BURGESS FAMILY TRUST U/T/D-12/05/1994; REVISED&AMMENDED 04/13/2000 Board-of Trustees TRUST CONTACTS JAMES F. BURGESS, SST FRED J. BURGESS,Trustor (TEL: 503-620-1387) (TEL: 503-694-2545) (CRS._#: 503-708-4051) (mailing address) ELLEN.M. BURNS, TTS BURGESS FAMILY TRUST BARBARA A. HOLDEN, TTS 32399 S.W. LAKE DRIVE R.7.77!' • TODDPRAGER,.ASSOC. PLANNER/ARBORIST SEP 3 0 2008 CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW HALL BLVD CITY 07 TIGARD TIGARD, OR. 97223 September 27, 2008 SUBJECT: TREE ISSUES AT 11380 SW FONNER ST/ PASSMORE PARTITION, MLP2001.00014 DEAR MR. PRAGER: THIS WILL ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT YOUR LETTER DTD 9/23/08 CONCERNING SAID PROPERTY IN ABOVE SUBJECT LINE. DUE TO MY DISABILITIES ('HAVE AUTHORIZED MY SON JAMES F. BURGESS TO REPRESENT M IN ALL MATTERS IN RESOLVING ISSUES WITH YOU AND OTHER OFFICIALS OF THE CITY OF TIGARD. HE HAS "POWER OF ATTORNEY" TO ACT ON MY BEHALF. I AM 83 YEARS OLD AND DISABLED WITH CRIPPLING ARTHRITIS COMPLICATED BY FOUR- TOTAL JOINT REPLACEMENTS WHICH NEVER FULLY RECOVERED. AS A RESULT I CANNOT WALK WITHOUT CANE(S) OR A WALKER. WITH SUCH I STILL CANNOT NEGOTIATE STAIRS OR • HIGH CURBS. MY MOBILITY IS VERY LIMITED. I AM ALSO HEARING IMPAIRED TO AN EXTENT THAT 1 CANNOT COMMUNICATE VIA NORMAL TELEPHONE USE. I AM, HOWEVER, PROFICIENT AT USING E-MAIL AND SENDING LETTERS VIA REGULAR US MAIL. FOR THE ABOVE REASONS I HAVE THREE REQUESTS. 1. PLEASE COMMUNICATE WITH ME BY LETTER OR E-MAIL. MY E-MAIL ADDRESS IS derfbna.comcast.net. MY SONS E-MAIL ADDRESS IS ifburgessacomcast.net. HIS US MAIL ADDRESS IS 11350 FONNER ST. , TIGARD OR. 97223. ALSO SEND A CC OF ANY COMMUNICATIONS TO BOTHME AND MY SON. 2. PLEASE EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR RESOLVING ISSUES TO DECEMBER 23, 2008. MY SON IS A MAJOR DIVISION MANAGER AT BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION. HIS TIME FOR WORKING ON EXTERNAL MATTERS DURING WEEKDAYS IS VERY LIMITED, HE WILL NEED MORE TIME THAN THE 30 DAYS INDICATED. 3. PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS LETTER VIA E-MAIL_ THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION FRED J. UrtsoE, S • • ic°ricl1ed 6G �,�1 00f)c 53 Todd Prager Py6•5 From: Pierre Gohier[prgohier @hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 10:08 AM To: Todd Prager Cc: 'Patty Gohier Subject: RE: Trees on Burgess lot Attachments: tree trunk.pdf Todd, Here is a picture of the stump left from the tree in question. Pierre Original Message From: Todd Prager [mailto:todd @tigard-or.gov] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 9:12 AM To: 'Pierre Gohier' Subject: RE: Trees on Burgess lot Yes. But if a tree is removed because it dies or is hazardous, it is exempt from penalties. This is why I am working with Mr. Burgess and his arborist to determine when and why the trees were removed. In my experiences, when removal occurs in a selective manner (i.e. one tree removed from a group) it is usually because a tree died or became hazardous. I want to be careful not to jump to conclusions before I have all of the information. I will keep you informed as I know more. -Todd Original Message From: Pierre Gohier [mailto:prgohier @hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 8:58 AM To: Todd Prager Cc: 'Patty Gohier' Subject: Trees on Burgess lot Todd, Per our conversation earlier this year, I was under the impression that since Mr. Burgess cut down a tree that he know was designated as "Save" would make him liable to penalties. Could you please keep me updated on the outcome of your discussions with Mr. Burgess? Thanks, Pierre Original Message From: Todd Prager [mailto:todd @tigard-or.gov] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 8:28 AM To: 'prgohier @hotmail.com' Subject: Thank you for your message Pierre. I am working with Mr. Burgess and his arborist on resolving this issue. -Todd 1 Original Message • • From: Todd Prager Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 4:30 PM To: 'prgohier @hotmail.com' Subject: FW: Attached, please find the arborist report for the Passmore Partition (MLP2001-00014) at 11370 SW Fonner Street. Todd Prager. City of Tigard Arborist 503 718-2700 2 .!.....'!..:: • Mi. . . . . ............: ..... .A :: ......ii:i I:..ii•iiiii 1 11 1 iii 1 ,,•.....•.:.'•...i..'•:Alit i.;.•..,....:''';'::x•'• : .• t• . .. •••:.•WirOyIrl,0 . •„ ,::•:•:•I. ••.•. •......},.• ••: • N. i•lif.•.. .. .....::::.... ...'"ii".•.• ...ii.I.,...„1.... . • 0 , • ,. :.. j lg.,.•.1.: . .. .. . •••• •••'••••••••••..•••"' • • •• .. ..........:..*...;:;. ••• li NIIIIMIIIIMIll iiiiiMINE 1 ..•;1•••»*.'...,'...i.;4 1....4 MI . ..,:!... •• '....,,. . • .......-4.6.4.1fril .. 1 . I : ..•••+/•".F.- •-',,,'-:Ifs .1.::.;F„ ,.. .- .. • ..q , Mk= . . . .. .. ,. ................ . • .. .. .. : . r • iii......: . • .. ••• :I, , • .„ !!!!!!!!!! . . ..: , • .... . • , . .... „ •• , : -. . . ....:•1,...,...g: . . . . . ..: •. • •• •• . "-...10...... .. . . .:.:... .. ... .. .. . „ ,.... .. ... ••••• - •,... "IIIIIIIIIIIhkui4,....; 4k•:. • • ,R.'•.::.:;..!:?.:::::ii417:..:.. 1 .. . • •": :.;.7.r:::::'71•i:Vi? - ..... . ... •.. • . • ". • 4 Irliit;::..,..•::%::..:. .i; :.. .. • ..c.::..,„:„.•::::.„....•..:: • ..,. ...,.:.„,„...... . . •..:.:. ••• . •... . : ,.... .:::::::;,,,,,,.,,,:::,:.::::•„......::::...:,:: .„,,,, •• • . . '•••i...,:K.E. . ..•• • s/4 I 1 •..,, ..4..:,,,.......;: t:.: .dj:::: •.:. •: .. . . • ;0::•: :r".•...:•'! ,• ' i 1.11111411,41 .4:if v...••::: .. . . 111 .:...1:1....... t. ..-•.': •- - "4::. ••4:ir. ...... :: ..•.::::..::: 1 .,, ....s •••,•::- -+. .•t:. ....••.r. , ..• „...::..... ....,.. 1:7?eil. . ...... . . .. A , ••' r :,,. 1::: •• , .. ...... ..%::: ''• . •S'ir::.0'''... '''' :iii.'i.';::iiitiiiiN•.;;.%":11:li.!::::•4PI: , • ...: I .:.:.::•• : • • i4 111. ' ,...1"i..;....: ., •• •••.: • • •-7 IllikW: •::.+.:0::.:.0.:' .,,, ..1:. 1 ‘01 r. ... ..•••.•;.... .. . .. go, II'. •.,..% . ..• ,,,, .:.•:•.' . •• ..:::.:::. • '4.: .....! I:.••• . Or ''.• .: ' •, . . . ,.. • ..., • ' ' ..'.....,.:: . ii.. .." • • ... , :.i. : . .... . .. .. . ..... • • li .....'..w:\ ::... • . ... . ..:,.. • • • :.:::::.• .:::•PI:. ::::%::::::••• . • •• • " .. •.• • ..1.;.:•.,... .. :::.... .:i::::.....:: .9••••11:1•••••:* :: • :%.;...•••••.. •:. .• 1.'•• P '''" • . ... ...... . • ••• •i.,it.:':•irg,'.....-'--•+.. 40:::::"ii: • ••••.:••••••-. • " '.•.. 1 ok. :%•.: : ,. ... 4 • •• • --- • ...: • • • . .•*11 :: : . ' ....'1.' •... '''..c•f? :: .. #. ,• • "..:::t. ,#.r. . . •.:•11r0'• ••:+,•'::..•:• .::: •••••..,•:•■4.::k...• :14./. II lii,.:• ::. ..• •+.. „•••'!J. . .,•.•..0.. 0::!!.•,. •,.Ipi;:i+Pi.. V::4.- ...21. •l'": ••...N::.:.'•••".,:NV: .•• . ..;•'t••:.... • !.... ...'....',:ii...1 . ,... :...-'' • .:111,!...•...;:•. .. •.:Pl•::.:ine..N C.•':fr-4. .i:•.; :...11Pe.e...•• e'', .,N!....4."!.• .4,:.:..•:• ;'.:4;:.!,,,:..2....'5iiii 7...i::.•.:".: ..e.....4.g.t.. ....e..r.:::............:• .:..:. .../.......,:i...........: ' .40.4 • .... .:"*". .. Is';':-"IC!, ;ft:I:.%I!i.;:i.11:::.k.,•.;..'••;;f;1: .................... ;or'.....•::::;:!::::::::::„..:..... ,... ..• 'Iii.i..Zt . ••• ....4.1:1•!•••:::::1. '!:•:. ,1:1 Al I aff •• ••4...ivr.. ::0 „;...'i4::..•.`,‘.:.J.:...:...•4P-.... s::. 44:4:e.:••••■PilX;•.....++4: •••••••••••'•1.•!..:',•••.I. :.::::. • /I • • • „ •• '...i.7-:,..2 Ir.....14,,troa ..• • ' / 4 t. .:, ••'.T. .•:.'7..1' •...."';'.13■;.V‘Itii••••:4.4!:NO- . •....iiii : .... +:: ."1......r."1...•:::li.:!:::::: • • ... . ...:.:.P;. •- . ood• .44 li:',.."-•:•.0•17/0. Pli:..„:%:".•0:.. :' ; '""•.._ ....4.:::::: • . ..•• . ... :. " '1,°•.;!'•.:- ...,.i.•• .'.••••:..:::"••••■0 niiii ;!:.!:!..:••.:•f. I... . .dlii::::••1 ''•:.•4.11' '•••• •. - .• ‘ ? •.%....?`..f....1'.1..::4,.:...11. 711.1.::••:.;...,''.;.'• '•el' .::::;:::::? ::::.. .: .#" "'ad° .4Hr .•' 4..:' 'il•f::::::::: • • :: :••• ' •....*::,:::#.:,!1:1'..!".'..;;:011r.'7::.: 1 -.WT.*:,:•...# # 1/. r :.6.911.•• ••••••'•......:::: Igipc:' ). ... .. • ••• • ... ........ :: • • - " • " ri..4 11:::.t '1:::: .. 4 •11110ffri " '..!..::•••••'+' ''..1..iist7tSim::#1:.•, ii i iiiiii. • ::•:•.:. iiii. • • • • • ... i. ... ..• ••i .. . .. .i .. . . • :. ii•::.•if...:- i•--ii%..i.ht+.41' ..• ;F.'.. .. i . : 4.... • k, .,,., ' ,, vr.:4,....,.....'!...•••••••• ' . ,. .'7."::.......1.1.::. ..I.,t ' . .i.:•'. .:'"...., 911.::.'6 ....- . ill ,,, • ....•••••• • • 31.1■.1 U.S. Postal Servicem, CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT E' (Domestic Mail Only;No Insurance Coverage Provided) .A mRFor delivery information visit our website at www.usps.como Ln tal l ; 0.42 . !,y 7.m Postage $ 2.7 0 ?o,,(4,„ r-R - �. O Certified Fee ��• �: Return Receipt Fee 2.20 0 1 dy' __,y b O (Endorsement Required) . / CI Restricted Delivery Fee s c3 (Endorsement Required) X4. 5.32 o ,,- f- Tfital Pplaglat&Fees Sent To r II o or at 5-5 i,4"• I / ru3�' !; p Street,Apt.No.;p_ or PO Box No. 3 3 77 S`, L.kt: Drive City,State,ZIP+4 I'v 150 n v- I c (.)R ,! O 70 PS Form 3800.August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY • Complete items 1, 113.Also complete A Sign. . : ( \• '. -Tom. item 4 if Restricted .ev'ery is desired. /1G-_ 7 ❑Agent • Print your name and address on the reverse . ,,,-----g. J it Ir`t►v 'Y+ ❑Addressee ( so that we can return the card to you. B. Received by(Printed Name) . Date of Delivery • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. Ii' t "V j D. Is delivery address different from item 1? a Yes 1. Article Addressed to: If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑ No 13Urle SJ TAM ry 7it'S — 3,p. 1 y y s w(` '.aICC Pr.v1., `'joi v.Ile� g 7 7010 3. Service Type .Certified Mail ❑Express Mail ❑Registered ❑Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mall ❑C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes 2. Article Number [ 7007 0710 0000 1305 1169 (Transfer from service labe0 ■ PS Form 3811,February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595.02-M-1540 1 • • City of Tigard, Oregon • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, OR 97223 ®I • . _Ty. • . September 23, 2008 ¢T IrG�AR�D} Burgess Family Trust 32399 SW Lake Drive Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 RE: Tree Removal at 11380 SW Fonner Street/Passmore Partition (MLP2001-00014) Dear Burgess Family Trust: The City of Tigard has reason to suspect that a 25-inch diameter willow and a 22-inch diameter fix at 11380 SW Former Street have been removed. These trees were listed as "save"in the Passmore Partition (MLP2001-00014) tree protection plan and were not to be removed unless declared dead or hazardous according to a certified arborist. I have enclosed excerpts of the tree protection plan for the Passmore Partition that demonstrates the trees that were to be preserved and the trees that were to be removed. If the trees were removed because they were dead or hazardous, please provide the City with supporting documentation from a certified arborist. If the trees were removed illegally, please provide the City with the required mitigation fee of$5,875.00 (47 diameter inches removed x $125/inch mitigation fee). Failure to provide the City of Tigard with the necessary arborist report or mitigation fee on or before Thursday, October 23,2008 will result in a citation by Tigard's Code Enforcement Officer. Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions regarding this correspondence. Sincerely, 7:-A//44.7. Todd Prager City of Tigard Associate Planner/Arborist Cc: Christine Darnell, Code Enforcement Officer Enclosures: Excerpts from the tree protection plan for 11380 SW Former Street/Passmore Partition (MI.P2001-00014) Stump of 22-inch diameter fir Phone: 503.639.4171 • Fax: 503.684.7297 • www.tigard-or.gov • TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 III • Sent By: HP LaserJet 3100; 5032396133; Nov-9-01 11 :26PM; Page 3 w:.: 11/09/2001. 6701 :50377470. COLLIER ARBOR CARE PAGE 02 .Marti4,'free keport Paget of 4 ' . ti • •r; TREE INVENTORY • . • The following 13 trees�:over 12-inches in diameter were identified by species, measured _ for tri k diameter, visually rated for crown condition, and recommended for'either removal or p1eservatibti (Table#1). Tree diameter wa$••measured at 4.5-feet above grade • unless.noted)because o multiple,trunks. If the'tree had multiple' runks it was measured t.(a ' below_be folk. The condition of the trees was rated•by good, £air, and poor assessments . accord`tig.to the followingidefinitions. • , Wood trunk and crown have no significant problems observed,,and growth rate is • • •g;riorni4: • . . is 7.: • fair-•;some t trunk and crown problems observed, growth rate reduced. ' M.• 1i: . §13oor 4.significant trunk and crown problems observed that limits life span and is a • Plhigh.tiazard•potential for failure. Growth rate is poor. , • TABLE#1 y4 DittMeter- • S ies • inches Condition Action Coinxnerit� .• Aau 1'as fit •• : 35: w- Good : Save . ' • Do as fit '.28i" Good . • Save . Do its 40 Good : ave • 2-ttu. -• • • :b0 4.les •fit :22; . Good • Save • • Do . • ' . •3 Good • .: Save - - Do 1' :30! Good , Save • • Doti!las • .37 Good : Save ' Good Save ---, •Do :las fit 34 1 . • Under•34"fir, • . t1low 25 . Fair . , Save I k • deadwood in crown . :1.ple ..13; • oo. Remove • , 4-trunks; near house . IIIIL ••: 4; • Good emove 4-trunks, near house IIIIIVTIENEIIII .:20• •F air ' emove In driveway , 8'! Fair 1.emove In driveway .. •. 4 s • ' TREE INVENTORY SUMMARY • = :.• • Of dill trees, four are rccomn ended for removal due to probable construction conflicts • and n ie are recomineiid4d for preservation. The total diameter inches of the removed • , trees wale .75 inches::The total diameter inches of the preserved trees equals 274. The total ameter of all 13"trees is 349 inches. R • . • F / ®Col ier A or Care,Inc: •• • • 11/9/2001 :;r I H . 4110 • Sent By: HP Laser Jet 3100; 5032398133; Nov-9-C1 11 :27PM; Page 8/8 11/09/2001: 07$41 ., 50377479:. . COLLIER ARBOR CARL PAGE 05 , . . . , . ..F,.. . Appen #1 Site Plan 1: : . , • . • Martirirkree Relaort • . .. Page 1 of 1 . i i-T-A.--7- i-- . ___ _.. ......... _s_...._ ' •''.• - 4\feN ....® • ' ,34s" 490P•371( 1 C)DF jo" . • . p5 . i •• : : 1 S'SO DA- " . r.4.: t••;,i;',..• -'Z‘" ...--...\ 7 Of /te,1 r . :..,,,,s• ' ;". ,--, • , . PS• Y -- - - — .-- . 'W.f.: . ', •1 1 I • I * . . :3.P. .... . . . 'S .. . ::'4 . .1.1. ,•)•9• I :g-f.:i • ; • :$ . ; • tii - .'? .. ' \,... II 1.--V r• el"—. • fl: Ki .:. . 10 I`..51 1 ,,....._......,...,, v.t . • .. . : . I 4- R I.( .•••"•, Pn,:rzti,1 . -.....:: • i: . : rs.kl;•eri-. , •p.: . .0. 7. '... 41561-/rIzi— 3,511 Li gi • "fi• , ff-sl: ( I 6 I 0 A'-11,, 1+,1) 0,0-4 I , 1 1•41.,...,-;,- ;4;: . •:. . • it ... . . • fri.. ..• :. .x—I —r— .---- • ri LI6 ' • .1 ••,:k ...... — — . • t.% • t••• I / • ii: • :=• . ..t, . ;:.?..t '1.• 1 • •,...,‘ i 1 . . . . • . . . . , • fi •.: ; • . • g ... I • •••1:::1 ' t • t . •••.; I . . • .... . . • • ,,....: •:: . • 1 i • :i • 1 A .,..t. . (:: ii" f . . .. . . gi.: g•-: , - ". . . :. . . . .. . : . . . § 7: . . . . . . . . • .i:''''. .• .. :: : . ti • ff, ; .... .: ; . . . . CCo1lierOsbor Care,Inc • : .. pd . 11/9101 li• :, • : : . . ...... ; • D.,,,,, • : . ' : tii : i .• .. ; • • •• el • r. :::; ; . .. .. • '.......bafpf14-r.'•-• ........kiaKii),ii::;:iiirtft-,.'..•., • ''•'••••••••••:::•1::,::,..•:' .., ..::::..,...:A.:'.....''..,Fi ...• ..,•••1:.r.....:,„.',:.'.. :,r'f.......?e...' . !tlit!:,..,,..ci....,'''.."'.t....i.,,''...„. .,T.1.1i,etic.„,,VT.7!1„....i';',' ,,iF....y.443. fill! ,.....1'.E1':**....1...,.`...,1,4:*i!...',';''''',0',7:',11......;0.'+'..........=,:.f.o.j:r •.•:•..,01,4;tz.. '.'• -:4'.M .T..........-,,,,',':' ++.4..'...1••.;.':.:.•• . . •• -.1-..'''.' T• •.01; , l''• •• '•••'•!••:1•1•1•••.•,::.:.....f.:•.' • ' • .. . . . . ..5ft, .1.N.C.;•1 ;..p.,,R404......„, -- ....—...,......- •. . . . .. : •••• • .. :.....?..,.......,:....0...,...,:5„,••,..i.....:::::,::••.,,.,..i.:••• .. ..,. .........:.........!........................:4„;•:..„:„...„,:_a..i.„- , :::„....,•,•••••::. . ....:,;..:::,,J...... •• ..;„.:,::: :..„..:•i•.::r..•....•:••• •••.•••• :•,......i•;:•:::::.:•. , • .....:.,......, ... .......:4,:•:,:;•:.,..:•,...:::.. . ••••••••••:,•h,....::::::>:••••••.:.... ,..• .1.,:::4::••• „:„,,..,.14.0:„,•,:!, .. . . ••• ...T.,:: . 0m. . .. - '...'':•4dR,T••••41.;'P.'''''' „ . • • , ','•::0.1.$ w's4.;:'..V.:7.1.;%. . . . „. . , ...1.11S:.::::::•zi,• • , .. . . .„ , . , ... 4'..4'P4•:'' ''••••• ' .... .4.,........„,..„.........„* ..+ „ .f. .. ... . .. . , ,...:. ,- :.:,,eat,,I.in:,,qty+gull,,,II - • ,rt.4,44:4 iiv.:41:0,,,,,,. ... .. . .... . . . ,. . „ . . . . . .... : ;;;..:.:.„:-.....,...!-....,.. i •. ..,4E4,..,K4i,........,,,,,,,•:::•:".7' , • C.. :.::.,.:%1•••,,,,r.-14,,....t.i,.....,., . , . . . . J.• .i,6....•.";11::..' ''''''.....rr • ,... .''f'..ai;/'.`.'',,...1.1:',4‘'.!,'Sii..... 4.4* ..;t1', t'..r..•,„?,'"...• ••-•••• :• .. '''''.11.'''':,ir'.:•':,:'::::4;ljtt,'.1i:!:,, . ... ' ';....1%•:d. • , . . •-• .` -...••C•':-.,... • ' ,T. "',..,:,„ :T.,,-,.,atf.':...--,4-=:',..,.. . •• .-•. , , „ , ..-....• 04F,... .;Z!.•.:.:.,.- ''''I k» ,,,I'1;1,' ' . ' •• •. .- . ..-... . • , .., . ' ••• ... . .. .••••• . .. , • .. '''1:•:T.:::....,;':::•'•. " : . . ••:••.;•,•:•• • • t::::;i:• '': '',,, ,,A111 s., III , . ..zt..• , ...,.. .. , ... . ... ' •••• * ..A. . • " ',OW. ... !..: ili.::2;ia'.. •.,::.. .... .. ... . .., al, ,..a•7;.',:::::. • • ::,::' ' • , . • t;1 ' ': ' '''N1:4: . . • . ..°% . ..a.., 1 .....i.::. ...•v......-af1;171 . i. . ...;:'.... .. ••-,-• s"fe-,..-... ..,i4-;• : .:,...: . •:.::4,.',1'...t.'7';.„-'•!''......: ,:e' :,., ,,il • -•••• ,..] . ..f.r.:.; • t.i",'..,••.-...:•14 lb, . . :, ••,r•;:.: gr'''• ..••• • ,::.1::. .'•." . ' "'■ ' . , . .k, .. l'. 1:.'i'.• • • . ..•.... •• ....... •--. . • ' ' ..$' •I.,:. ' ' • , •4...,it :AO: •:•,:f.a.':;•:..'..'• • .■ • : 1 • , . , .., . •• . . . . „, .. • .' . . , '11••.•,...-:,...... . ''..,'" .''' • ..",.'•••,- •-•- ' . . .• I ''''.'''..8,, ''...•':::•:•.::::.•,••.'••• .:'..5.;.i....t .'..y., '..A'..;'..,;;:......... . . ' . . . •::::::1,!P•••••: . ..:` ..g7.41,,,,tr.• ' .. . . '':,.;.::i..75.:'?"' . . . ,..,', ,i., ...:.• ,,, : , , . ••••••.-y.,:uct• ..• • , • • • . .. ,. Iiii •... , . ••': ,.. . ' :':, - , , . ,..' . • • • , . . . .: .,-,••.;11r. ' 1 , . .. . ' ::,,,,,,:,,,.,,,,,,.•:'„.„•,_ , ,. . , . ': I•I•:'',''''.*"*. • ,::: . . . ... . , ...... ,,... • ,. . . . .•• • „ . • • •:::. ., . . , • . .. • " A '''..'."::::..'• . •.X. „ . f.iti. ''.::::42,,, • :.;.1.•• • , • . . ' • • • • ., .. . .:•4.'•. .1.••:,:5.1;• .. , •;;:',.....■•• . . ... '.:•••:.!1!....•,. ' • •• .•:::P.',./4.0., . . . . .. . , , . .. .... • .•.•. .,. " '.. il. .,.....• , '7.?..,411',....... "::•••••■•:' •••••;•:;•: . 1 . , , Ilt"*.•81ZSI ::" 'F:'+' F.!' .... ..,411 # ....:-'..•'5:•'' mmousemonee„ ma Wash) County,Oregon 2002-065249 06/07.202:41:33 PM D•R/B Cnta1 8tna6 J GREGORY $20.00$6.00$11.00 •Total:$37.00 . After recording, return to: 0 City of 13125 SIW gard -Hall Blvd.Records Division 1111111111111 1111111 I 111111 T. 00111317200200652490040047 Tigard, OR 97223 I,Jerry Hanson,Director ofAssessmerit and Taxation „ . and Ex-Offlelo County Clerk for Washington County, Yd do hereby certifythat the within Instrument of writing v” was received and recorded In the bo k of records of said county. � °• Jerry R.Hanson,Director DLR mint and�Taxation, Ex-Officio County Clerk RESTRICTIVE COVENANT (FUTURE STREET IMPROVEMENTS) THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 1Z-- day ofu 2002, by the City of Tigard, a /Municipal Corporation of Washington County, Oregon, ("CITY"), and /{z� 1 f% 2.L.L -1-;r54e,.-/ PL... , a eamoratitYll authorized to do business in the State of Oregon, ("OWNER"). RECITALS WHEREAS OWNER is the Owner of record of Property covered by this Agreement as shown in Section 1 below, and WHEREAS OWNER has received approval of a development on the Property from the CITY, as set forth in MLP 2001-00014 dated January 11, 2002, and WHEREAS Chapter 18.810 of the TMC (Tigard Municipal Code) contains certain conditions applicable to • street improvements, and issuance of permits is conditioned on OWNER'S compliance with the TMC, and WHEREAS OWNER wishes to mitigate the impacts of the proposed development, and WHEREAS parties wish to fulfill the requirements of Chapter 18.810. IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual promises, convenants and undertakings, and the issuance of a building permit in advance of OWNER constructing improvements required by the TMC, the parties agree as follows: Section 1: The real property subject to this Agreement is described as follows: Parcels 1 and 2 of Partition Plat No. 2002-040 0 0 2-0 4 0 , recorded as �� Document No. 2002065248 , Washington County, Oregon. OWNER agrees that the terms of this Agreement shall bind the OWNER as well as its heirs, successors in interest or assigns. Section 2: The improvements covered by this Agreement are as follows: SW Fonner Street Half-street improvement adjacent to the subject property to meet the City's minor collector standard. Restrictive Covenant (Future Street Improvements) Page 1 of 4 Revision date: 111101 LIUII1IIIIIUIII • 2002-65249 Section 3: This Agreement shall be in full force and effect from the date of its execution until the improvements referred to in Section 2 are constructed in accordance with CITY standards in effect at the time of construction. Section 4: CITY agrees that the improvements listed in Section 2 will only be required as a result of any one of the following events: (1) when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the formation of a Local Improvement District, (2) when the improvements are part of a larger public project to be financed or paid for in whole or in part by CITY or other public agency, (3) when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and involves the sharing of design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s) of property in addition to the property described in Section 1, or (4) when construction of the improvements are deemed to be appropriate by the City Engineer in conjunction with construction of improvements by others adjacent to the improvements described in Section 2. In addition to this Agreement, OWNER'S obligation to share design and/or construction expenses may arise by application of the Reimbursement District Ordinance; Chapter 13.09, TMC, or any similar ordinance or law providing a process whereby such expenses are distributed among benefited properties. Section 5: OWNER agrees to sign any and all waivers, petitions, consents and all other documents necessary to obtain the above listed applicable improvements under any improvement act or proceeding of the State of Oregon, Washington County, or the CITY as may be proposed or adopted and to waive all right to remonstrate against the improvements listed in Section 2 above, submitted either alone or in conjunction with other improvements described in Section 4, as may be proposed. OWNER agrees that in lieu of any other document, CITY may treat this Agreement as a waiver of remonstrance on behalf of the property described in Section 1 against formation of such a Local Improvement District. OWNER covenants and agrees that the improvements described in Section 2 will specially benefit OWNER'S property as described in Section 1. • Section 6: If CITY decides to form a Local Improvement District as a mechanism for the installation of improvements listed in Section 2, then OWNER shall retain the right to protest only the amount or the manner of spreading the assessment, but not the formation of such district. Section 7: CITY acknowledges that OWNER'S execution and performance of the terms of this Agreement constitutes compliance with the requirements of TMC Chapter 18.810. Section 8: OWNER agrees that if CITY causes the improvements listed in Section 2 to be constructed, or part of such improvements without regard to the source of funds for such project, but not as part of a Local Improvement District, then CITY will charge to OWNER and OWNER will promptly pay OWNER'S share of the cost of such improvements. OWNER'S share will be determined by CITY in a manner similar to spreading the cost of a public improvement to specially benefited properties. The parties intend OWNER to share in the cost of improvements even though actual construction is undertaken and performed by some third party, so long as the improvements, listed in Section 2, are included within the project. • Restrictive Covenant (Future Street Improvements) Page 2 of 4 Rawson date: 111101 a • I II 1011111111 I • 2002-65249 (1) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (2) of this section, prior to construction of such improvements under this section, OWNER shall be provided not less than six (6) months written notice by first class mail that the project will be built. The notice shall advise OWNER that OWNER will share in the cost of such improvements and provide OWNER with an estimate of the total project cost as well as an estimate of OWNER'S share of the costs. Failure to provide this "six month" notice in advance of construction shall not nullify OWNER'S obligation to pay, but shall only extend the payment due date by the amount of time less than six months that notice was given, but not more than six months. Upon completion of improvements pursuant to this Section, CITY shall provide written notice to OWNER of OWNER'S share of the actual cost of the improvements and OWNER shall pay OWNER'S share within sixty (60) days. If OWNER's share of the cost of the improvements is $10,000 or more, the owner may elect to pay the City in 10 equal annual installments, with the first installment due within 60 days of the notice. The installment option shall be available only if the OWNER provides written notice and the first payment within 60 days of the notice. If the installment option is chosen, the unpaid amounts shall bear interest at the then legal rate of interest. Interest on overdue payments shall bear interest at the rate of one and one-half (1 '/2%) per month from the date the payment is due until paid. (2) Where the improvements listed in Section 2 are constructed by a third party, who seeks reimbursement in accordance with the Reimbursement District Ordinance, Chapter 13.09, TMC, or a similar ordinance, then the terms and procedures of the ordinances shall apply in lieu of the provisions in subsection (1) of this section. Section 9: At any time prior to the events listed in Section 4, OWNER or OWNER's successors may pay to the CITY an amount determined by the CITY to be OWNER's share of the anticipated cost of the future improvements. Payment under this section shall discharge all of OWNER's obligations under this Agreement. City shall use the funds received under this section solely to pay for the costs of the improvements. Section 10: CITY and OWNER intend that all terms of this Agreement shall be covenants, conditions, and restrictions running with the title to the property covered by this Agreement, and shall be binding upon parties to this Agreement, their heirs, executors, assigns, administrators, and successors and shall be construed to be a benefit and a burden upon the property described in Section 1. The parties agree the CITY may, for purposes of recovering the cost of improvements described in Section 2, levy an assessment against the property, described in Section 1, and may enforce payment of such assessment in the manner provided in ORS Chapter 223 or the general laws of the State of Oregon. Section 11: Promptly after its execution by the parties, this Agreement shall be recorded in the records of Washington County to provide public notice and especially notice to future owners of property, described in Section 1 of the conditions, covenants and restrictions against the title to the property imposed by this Agreement. Section 12: CITY may enforce the terms of this Agreement in any court of competent jurisdiction. In addition to any other legal remedies, OWNER'S failure or refusal to comply with this Agreement shall constitute a violation of the TMC and the rights, remedies, and penalties provided in the TMC may also be enforced. Restrictive Covenant (Future Street Improvements) Page 3 of 4 Revision date: 1/1/01 11111111111 MIN • 2002-65249 Section 13: If suit or action is instituted to enforce a right guaranteed in this agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to, in addition to the statutory costs and disbursements, a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the trial and appellate courts respectively. Section 14: The parties agree that if any term of provision of this agreement is declared by a court to be illegal or in conflict with any law, the validity of the remaining terms and provisions shall not be affected, so long as this agreement continues to reflect the intent of the parties. The parties shall negotiate an equitable adjustment of this agreement so that the purposes of this agreement are effected. OWNER(S): `_ Si ture Signature ///9Y'L f l /' /77/ ' •� Name (Print or Type) Name (Print or Type) Title (Print or Type) Title (Print or Type) Acknowledgment of OWNER'S signature(s) must be notarized. Where the OWNER is a corporation, it has caused its name to be signed by resolution or official approval of its board of directors. STATE OF OREGON County of Was ) On this (7 day V1 s 01/44.- c, , 2o62 , before me a Notary Public, ist \RAar.-h 4,L1 personally appeared and acknowledged that the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act and deed. Before me: . oFFicw.s Notary Public for Oregon SHERMAN S.CASPER S. V"'�� COMMISSION Np 323s 09 p 13 Zvo3 My commission ex fires: ay my=MISSION EXPIRES MAY 13,2003 202 Accepted on behalf of the City of Tigard this (off" day of -I✓va c-- , 0 tt City Engineer NO CHANGE IN TAX STATEMENT document4 Restrictive Covenant (Future Street Improvements) Page 4 of 4 Revision date: 1/1101 • 2/5/02 Conditions Ailociated with Case #: MLP21110-00014 3:09:20 PM Cond. Stat. Changed Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By 0001 RECIPROCAL EASEMENT DOC 0 Not Met MAS 1/29/02 BLW 1. Provide documentation that a reciprocal easement ensuring access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. 0001 STREET TREE PLAN 0 Not Met MAS 1/29/02 BLW 2.Provide a plan showing street trees planted along the proposed access to parcel#2 according to Section 18.745.040.C. of the Tigard Development Code. 0003 STREET OPENING PERMIT/P-IMP PLANS 0 Not Met BDR 1/29/02 BLW 3.A Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the new sanitary sewer lateral,driveway approach and any other work in the ROW. The applicant will need to submit five(5)copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the.public improvements. 0029 COMP AGRMNT/$ASSURANCE INFO REQD 0 Not Met BDR 1/29/02 BLW 4.As a part of the public improvement plan submittal,the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement(if one is required)and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example,specify if the entity is a corporation,limited partnership,LLC,etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 0001 ADDRESSING FEE 0 Met 2/5/02 DCP 2/5/02 PLN 5.Prior to approval of the final plat,the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). Paid Recept#2002-436 0001 STREET IMPROV AGREEMENT 0 Not Met BDR 1/29/02 BLW 6.The applicant shall enter into a Street Improvement Agreement with the City whereby they agree to complete or participate in the future improvements of SW Fonner Street adjacent to the subject property,when any of the following events occur: A.when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the formation of a Local Improvement District, B.when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for in whole or in part by the City or other public agency, C.when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and involves the sharing of design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s)of property in addition to the subject property,or D.when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate by the City Engineer in conjunction with construction of improvements by others adjacent to the subject site. 0001 DRVWY USE/MAINT AGREEM'NT 0 Not Met BDR 1/29/02 BLW 7.A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for all common driveways. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. 0001 UTILITY LINES 0 Met 2/5/02 DCP 2/5/02 PLN 8.The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Fonner Street underground as a part of this project,or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is • parallel to the utility lines and will be$27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen,the amount will be$2,200.00 and it shall be paid prior to approval of the final plat. Recpt#2002-436 0001 GPS COORDINATES 0 Not Met BDR 1/29/02 BLW 9.The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system(GPS)geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary.Along with the coordinates,the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: -GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • -By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. • Page 1 of 2 • • Receipt #: 27200200000000000436 0Q��� Date: 02/05/2002 T I D E M A R K COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Line Items:. Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due iii MLP2001-00014 [EADDRE]Address Fee 100-0000-433070 $30.00 MLP2001-00014 [UNGRND] Fee Lieu Underground 230-0000-445003 $2,200.00 % Payments: %110 Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Cash HAMPTON PT. PROFIT SHARING PLAN 0 0 $5.00 Check HAMPTON PT. PROFIT SHARING PLAN 0 240.03176 0 $2,225.00 0 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $2,230.00 .v 0 r NOTICE OFD TYPE;II DECISION MINOR`,,LAND PARTIT`IOR.:(MLR) 2001`,-00.014 ! Ah CITY OF TIOARD, Commu�iity,3evevprrrent PASSMORE PARTITION.J sfiapingABettereommumty, 120 DAYS =04/11/2002 • SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: PASSMORE PARTITION CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2001-00014 PROPOSAL: A request to Partition one existing lot of 0.42 acres into two (2) parcels of 7,509 and 8,023 square feet. An existing single-family dwelling exists on the subject parcel. However, the existing dwelling will be on proposed parcel #1 and will meet all applicable setbacks of the base zone. APPLICANT: Charles H. Martin OWNER: Hampton PT LLC Hampton PT Profit Sharing Trust By Thomas Fisher 944 SE Sellwood Blvd. P.O. Box 11370 Portland, OR 97202 Portland, OR 97211 ZONING DESIGNATION: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. LOCATION: 11370 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2101. PROPOSED PARCEL 1: 7,509 Square Feet. PROPOSED PARCEL 2: 8,023 Square Feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390 (Decision-Making Procedures); 18.420 (Land Partitions); 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation); 18.715 (Density Computations); 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening); 18.765 (Off-Street parking and Loading Requirements); 18.790 (Tree Removal); 18.795 (Visual Clearance Areas); 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). SECTION II. DECISION riotice. is hereby g iven. that .the City: O f Tigard Communit y ,DeveloP men t Directors:desi9n ee has . APPROVED`the above request:subject yto=certain•conditions; •The fin_ dmgsrand:-conclusions;on which"the e=• decision is=:based are•noted�in.Section V:... • NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 1 OF 14 • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE'OFBU LDING PERMITS;. THE FOLLOWIN.0 C:ONDITION.S STiALL:;130,SATISFIED Submit the following to the Planning Department (Mathew Scheidegger 630-4171, x317) for review and approval: 1. Provide documentation that a reciprocal easement ensuring access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. 2. Provide a plan showing street trees planted along the proposed access to parcel #2 according to Section 18.745.040.C. of the Tigard Development Code. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL;BE:SATISFIED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT.: ,: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 3. A Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the new sanitary sewer lateral, driveway approach and any other work in the ROW. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 4. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity i incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 5. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). 6. The applicant shall enter into a Street Improvement Agreement with the City whereby they agree to complete or participate in the future improvements of SW Fonner Street adjacent to the subject property, when any of the following events occur: A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the formation of a Local Improvement District, B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for in whole or in part by the City or other public agency, C. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and involves the sharing of design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s) of property in addition to the subject property, or D. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate by the City Engineer in conjunction with construction of improvements by others adjacent to the subject site. 7. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for all common driveways. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. 8. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Fonner Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The f, shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27:. per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $2,200.00 and it shall be paid prior to approval of the final plat. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 2 OF 14 • 9. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: o GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. o By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. 10. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. Attach a check in the amount of the current final plat review fee (Contact Planning/Engineering Permit Technicians, at (503)639-4171, ext. 426). C. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the.minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. D. The right-of-way dedication for SW Fonner Street shall be made on the final plat. E. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they.receive a letter from the City Engineering Department indicating: 1) that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor, and 2) that the,. applicant has either completed any public improvements associated with the project, or has at least obtained the necessary public improvement permit from the City to complete the work. F. After the City and.County have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer signature (for partitions), or City Engineer and Community Development Director signatures (for subdivisions). THE.FOLLOWING'CONDITIONS SHALLBE SATISFIED - PRIOR TO'IS -.- SUANCE OF B.UILDING.PERMITS � , ;,: .. , Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian !lager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 11. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a mylar copy of the recorded final plat. 12. Prior to issuance of the building permit for Parcel 2, the applicant shall pay the standard water quality and water quantity fees per lot (fee amounts will be the latest approved by CWS). • THIS APPROVAL IS'VALIDIF=EXERCISED.WITHINEIGHTEEN (18j: - 'MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE:DATE OF THIS DECISIONNOTED'rUNDER THE:PROCESS:AND-APPEAL'SECTION°OF THIS:DECISION SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Property History: The subject parcel is located within the City of Tigard. The property is designated Low Density Residential on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map. A record search indicates a minor land partition was approved on 10/29/98 (MLP98-00011). The decision was re-issued 11/5/98 due to an incorrect appeal date. However, the partition expired without the applicant meeting all the conditions. Site Information and Proposal Descriptions The subject property is approximately 18.295 square feet. The site has approximately 80 feet of ntage on SW Fonner Street. The owner is proposing a 2-parcel partition as indicated on the proposed `partition plat. Parcel #1 (7,509 square feet) Parcel #2 (8,023 square feet). A single-family residence exists on Parcel #1, which is proposed to remain. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 3 OF 14 • • • SECTION IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were received. SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Land Partitions (18.420): The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; The proposed partition will comply with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations at the time of proposed development as demonstrated both by the analysis presented within this administrative decision and by this application and review process through compliance with the conditions of approval. Therefore, this criterion is met. There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal; Public facilities are discussed in detail later in this decision under Chapter 18.810 (Street & Utility Improvement Standards). Based on the analysis provided herein, Staff finds that adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal. Therefore, this criterion is met. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards; and The public facilities and proposed improvements are discussed and conditioned later in this decision under Chapter 18.810 (Street & Utility Improvement Standards). Improvements will be reviewed as part of the permit process and during construction, at which time the appropriate review authority will insure that City and applicable agency standards are met. Based on the analysis in this decision, Staff finds that this criterion is met. All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below: The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. The minimum lot width required for the R-4.5 zoning district is 50 feet. The smallest of the lots has a minimum width of 65.08 feet. Therefore, this standard has been met. The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the. accessway may not be included in the lot area. The minimum lot area requirement in the R-4.5 zoning district is 7,500 square feet. The proposed partition creates three (2) lots that are 7,509 and 8,023 square feet respectively. The remaining 2,763 square feet will be used for the access and right-of-way dedication along SW Fonner Street. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The proposed partition plat demonstrates that each lot will have frontage onto a public right-of-way. Parcel #1 has 65.08 feet of frontage onto SW Fonner Street and Parcel #2 has 15 feet of frontage onto the proposed access, which connects to SW Fonner Street. Therefore, this standard has been met. Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. No development is proposed with this application. The existing home on Parcel #1 has a front yard setback of 27 feet . The rear yard setback is 45 feet, the east side yard setback is 18 feet and the west side yard setback is 5.9 feet. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. NOTICE OF DECISION • MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 4 OF 14 • • Proposed Lot #2 is a flag lot. However, no development is proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard will be reviewed when building permits are issued. A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. The applicant indicates in the narrative that the access drive will be screened from the adjoining property to the west with a 5-foot fence. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities. Fire district regulations are reviewed at the time of development. This criterion shall be addressed at that time. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. The applicant has proposed a shared driveway. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide documentation that a reciprocal easement ensuring access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. Any access way shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation. This standard is addressed under 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation) later in this decision. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred year floodplain, the city shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and whin the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for-the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. The partitioned lots are not adjacent to a one-hundred-year floodplain. Therefore, this standard does not apply. An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in accordance with Chapter 18.370, Variances and Adjustments. The applications for the partition and variance(s)/adjustment(s)will be processed concurrently. No variances or adjustments have been submitted with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the Minor Land Partition Standards have not been met. CONDTION: Provide documentation that a reciprocal easement ensuring access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. Residential Zoning Districts (18.510): Development standards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2 below: NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 5 OF 14 • • TABLE 18.510.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES �.e.-_ TANDARD Minimum Lot Size . - Detached unit 7,500 sq. ft. - Duplexes - Attached unit [1} 10,000 s q. ft. Average Minimum Lot Width - Detached unit lots 50 ft. - Duplex lots 90 ft. - Attached unit lots Maximum Lot Coverage - Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 20 ft. - Side facing street on corner& through lots 15 ft. - Side yard 5 ft. -Rear yard ' 15 ft. - Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district - Distance between property line and front of garage 20 ft. Maximum Height 30 ft. Minimum Landscape Requirement - [1]Single-family attached residential units permitted at one dwelling per lot with no more that five attached units in one grouping. [2]Lot coverage includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. * Multiple-family dwelling unit ** Single-family dwelling unit A minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet is required for each lot. The proposed lot sizes of 7,509 and 8,023 square feet meet this standard. Parcel #1 is developed with an existing single-family home tha' is approximately 27.10 feet from the front property line. The side yard setbacks are 5.99 feet from the western property line and 18.52 feet from the eastern property line. The rear and setback is 45.40 feet, which meets the setback standards of the R-7 zoning district. Setback standards, required by Table 18.510.2 will apply to all future development of the proposed lots. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Residential Zoning District Standards have been met. Access. Egress and Circulation (18.705): Continuing obligation of property owner. The provisions and maintenance of access and egress stipulated in this title are continuing requirements or the use of any structure or parcel of real property in the City. The applicant has been conditioned earlier in this decision under Chapter 18.420 (Land Partitions) to provide copies of access maintenance agreements for the proposed private drive. Therefore, this criterion has been met. Access Plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented an approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are.to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided a site plan showing a 15-foot-wide access used for access, egress and circulation for both lots. Joint Access. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses. structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this titl provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, lease- or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 6 OF 14 • Both proposed lots will take access off of the proposed private drive. Access maintenance agreements have been conditioned earlier in this decision under Chapter 18.420 (Land Partitions). Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approve by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. Both parcels will have access onto SW Fonner Street, by a 15-foot access drive. Therefore, this standard has been met. Inadequate or hazardous access. Applications for building permits shall be referred to the Commission for review when, in the opinion of the Director, the access proposed: Would cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or would provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or would in any other way cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. Direct individual access to arterial or collector streets from single-family dwellings and duplex lots shall be discouraged. Direct access to major collector or arterial streets shall be considered only if there is no practical alternative way to access the site. In no case shall the design of the service drive or drives require or facilitate the backward movement or other maneuvering of a vehicle within a street, other than an alley. Single-family and duplex dwellings are exempt from this requirement. :. According to Engineering Staff, additional traffic at this location and the placement of the proposed access drive will not create or increase a hazardous condition. They proposed access drive is approximately 190 feet from the intersection of SW Fonner Street and 113 Place and 50 feet from the adjacent driveway to the west. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. '9inimum access requirements for residential use. Private residential access drives shall be jrovided and maintained in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Fire Code. This standard will be address under the "Agency Comments" section of this decision. Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus by one of the following: a) A circular, paved surface having a minimum turn radius measured from center point to outside edge of 35 feet; b) A hammerhead- configured, paved surface with each leg of the hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a minimum width of 20 feet; c) The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is 5%. The site plan shows the access drive to be 113 feet in length. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds the Access, Egress and Circulation Standards have been met. Density Computations (18.715): A. Definition of net development area. Net development area, in acres, shall be determined by subtracting the following land area(s) from the gross acres, which is all of the land included in the legal description of the property to be developed: 1. All sensitive land areas: a. Land within the 100-year floodplain; b. Land or slopes exceeding 25%; c. Drainage ways; and d. Wetlands. 2. All land dedicated to the public for park purposes; 3. All land dedicated for public rights-of-way. When actual information is not available, the following formulas may be used: a. Single-family development: allocate 20% of gross acreage; b. Multi-family development: allocate 15% of gross acreage. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 7 OF 14 4. All land proposed for private streets; and 5. A lot of at least the size required by the applicable base zoning district, if an existing dwelling is to remain on the site. B. Calculating maximum number of residential units. To calculate the maximum number of residential units per net acre, divide the number of square feet in the net acres by the minimum number of square feet required for each lot in the applicable zoning district. C. Calculating minimum number of residential units. As required by Section 18.510.040, the minimum number of residential units per net acre shall be calculated by multiplying the maximum number of units determined in Subsection B above by 80% (0.8). The standards for Density computation deal with the intensity of residential land uses, usually stated as the number of housing units per acre. The total square footage of the subject property is 18,295 square feet. However, the square footage of Parcel #1 (7,509 square feet) is subtracted from the calculation because it is developed with a pre-existing single-family home. Other subtracted square footage is 1,695 square feet for the proposed access and 800 square feet for additional right-of-way needed to bring SW Fonner Street up to City standards. Therefore, density is calculated from a total square footage of 8,291 square feet. Minimum lot size for the R-4.5 zone is 7,500 square feet, which requires the maximum allowable density to be no more than 1 unit. The proposed partition creates 1 additional lot from the pre-existing home. Therefore, this standard has been met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Density Computation Standards have been met. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street trees: Section 18.745.040 Section 18.745.040.A.: All development projects fronting on a public street, private street or private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040C. The proposed partition has 80 feet of frontage on SW Fonner Street. Therefore, no street trees are required along SW Fonner Street. However, the private drive is approximately 113 feet in length. .. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing street trees planted along the proposed access to parcel #2 according to Section 18.745.040.C. of the Tigard Development Code. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet the standard the applicant shall satisfy the following condition: CONDITION:Provide a plan showing street trees planted along the proposed access to parcel #2 according to Section 18.745.040.C. of the Tigard Development Code. Tree Removal (18.790): A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot„ parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is pref=erred over removal wherever possible. The applicant has indicated that there are a total of 16 trees over 12-inches in diameter located on the proposed site. Two 18-inch trees equaling 36-inches will be removed as a result of this partition. Therefore, 87.5% of the trees 12 inches and greater will be retained. According to the mitigation standards of the above code, "retention of 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation." Therefore, this standard does not apply. However, if additional trees are to be removed, the applicant will be subject to the mitigation standards of the Development Code. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Tree Removal Standards have been met. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 8 OF 14 • • ,`- Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): This Chapter requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3. feet in height The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually.clear between three (3) and eight 8 feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight 8 feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a -foot distance points with a straight line. The site plan does not show any obstructions within the visual clearance triangle for the access drive. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the Vision Clearance Standards have been met. IMPACT STUDY (18.390.040): Requires that the applicant shall include an impact study. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication of real property interest, or provide evidence which supports the. conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. The applicant has proposed to dedicate 801 square feet of right- 1--way along SW Fonner Street. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the ,mpact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $7,062 ($2,260 divided by .32).The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the collector and arterial street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is $4,802. The applicant has agreed to enter into an agreement with the City whereby the owner agrees to participate in any future widening project for the street carried out by the Cifij, a third party, or through a local improvement district. The cost of the improvements is expected to be $4,603 (801 square feet x $3.00 per square foot, $2,403 + 80 feet x $27.50 for underground utilities), thus it meets the rough proportionality test. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a minor collector °reet to have a 60-foot right-of-way width and a 40 foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 9 OF 14 • • • This site lies adjacent to SW Fonner Street, which is classified as a minor collector on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 20 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate additional ROW to provide 30 feet from centerline. The applicant's application indicates they will provide that dedication. SW Fonner Street is paved but not fully improved to City standards. TMC 18.810.030(A) 1) states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with Ci standards. However, 18.810.030(A)(4) states that the City may accept a future improvement guarantee in lieu of street improvements if the improvement associated with the project does not, by itself, provide a significant improvement to the street safety or capacity. Although this development will incrementally increase the amount of traffic on the roadway, the increase will not substantially degrade the level of service on the street. A street improvement adjacent to this site, therefore, will not significantly improve the safety or capacity of the street. In addition, 18.810.030(A)(1)(e) states that a guarantee in lieu of street improvements is acceptable if the proposal is a land partition on property zoned residential and the partition does not create any new streets. This partition will not create a new street. Based on these code provisions, Staff therefore recommends that the applicant be required to enter into an agreement with the City whereby the owner agrees to participate in any future widening project for the street carried out by the City, a third party, or through a local improvement district. This agreement must be executed prior to approval of the final plat. The applicant's statement indicates they will enter into this agreement. Access to Arterials and Major Collectors: Section 18.810.030.P states that where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or major collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The design shall include any of the following: • A parallel access street along the arterial or major collector; • Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or major collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another street; • Screen planting at the rear or side property line to be contained in a nonacces. reservation along the arterial or major collector; or • Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives of this subsection; • If a lot has access to two streets with different classifications, primary access should be from the lower classification street. The applicant will serve the two lots with one joint driveway onto SW Fonner Street. This is acceptable, as there are no other access options for this site. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be • designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. No blocks are created or effected by the partitioning of the subject property. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing betwer connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental t.. topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 10 OF 14 • No blocks are created or effected by the partitioning of the subject property. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. Neither of the proposed lots are 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the R-4.5 zoning district. The depth of the lots are not more than 2.5 times the average lot width. The average lot width for both lots is 72.5 feet with an average depth of 108 feet. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. The proposed lots have frontage on SW Fonner Street. Proposed lot#1 has approximately 65.08 feet of frontage and proposed lot #2 has approximately 15.02 feet of frontage through an 15.02-foot driveway. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets.: By entering into the future improvement agreement for SW Fonner Street,this criterion will be met. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each .iew development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing public sewer line located in SW Fonner Street. that presently serves the existing home. A new service lateral will be provided from the main line for the new home on Parcel 2. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no upstream drainage hazards that impact this parcel. Parcel 2 will be graded and drained toward SW Fonner Street. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the "ty Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing ..raina9e facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 11 OF 14 • • In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that alfnew developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. Onsite detention is not required for small projects, such as partitions. The drainage for Parcel 2 can easily be directed toward SW Fonner Street where there is a roadside ditch. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeway/pedestrian path is required at this location. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. Not applicable. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. Not applicable. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and whir are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu �.. under-grounding. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 12 OF 14 • • There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Fonner Street. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 80 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $2,200.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: There is a ublic main line in SW Fonner Street that can serve this site. The existing home is presently served and the applicant will provide a new service to Parcel 2. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The CWS standards include a provision that would exclude small projects.such as residential land partitions. It would be impractical to require an on-site water quality facility to accommodate treatment of the storm water from Parcel 2. Rather, the CWS standards provide that applicants should pay a fee in- lieu of constructing a facility if deemed appropriate. Staff recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on this application. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within *he Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final plat. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. Survey Requirements The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS)geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comment: • Request signage or monument at foot of shared driveway identifying the two residences. City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comment: • Provide a fire hydrant within 500 feet of all portions of proposed construction for both parcels. City of Tigard Operations Department has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: Developer to be invoiced for removal/relocation of existing water meter to property. • Locate new water services out of driveway (landscape only). Lot 2 may need 1" water service and water meter due to service length. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 13 OF 14 • • SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to it. SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: , THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JANUARY 11, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JANUARY 29, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal; ector's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1: may. appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard. Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of,procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JANUARY 28, 2002. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. / /aff January 11, 2002 PREPARED BY: a ew ' }r!d!�! DATE Assistant Planner Janua ry 11, 2002 APPROVE BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Planning Manager i/cu rpin/mathew/mip/mIp2001-000014.dec NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 14 OF 14 NO ANTRIM • 1 I I CITY of TIGARD ,111 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM - _T VICINITY MAP alltilliiiii■ Jill_ I -SW , _� M1P2001-00014 SW ER.O� lU,•- ■ • PASSMORE PARTITION o*TrAli e/--- IN. Illi a • MI ST !IuIIIII, r =m.o.r �►� •�i■ 0 0. 1/ "4Y-fiRg,,FNR \ -Er A T P b, 671 . . kikv 1111 1 Ikon oval '.�euu.r�rtq�?, ty f.Q��_----�Q eaHrr�rr-o x... : v■ --.'-''''''adF fiEt / 4lLR ittt Ifc`, ', I,ti:-:,,,,„.,..„.,;i,,,,,,,„ • `-- ,k.,,� IPP .,./ Ti Ares Mep I I / ait WIP4 Itill ow '- 0 200 400 800 Feet . 1„. .4 fo ••. ,, �, 4111M 1"•400 feet illrij 72A% W ♦ c.;ern II i, II tVA VI 'S 2 ■O City of Tigard �G . ■. Informadon on this map Is for general location ony and A S Atli should be verified with the Development Services Division' ♦ ,C �. _ .. ■ 13125 SW Hall Blvd •' , 0 -. Tigard,f '23 2 W &�._∎ __ � ' _� Wr ._- httpih wwla. .f,/ onus Community D .ment C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR date:Dec 13,2001;C:\ma ic\MAGIC03,APR 1 1 . TL 6, IL 1200 TL 5100 • • �0V 2 0, , g aIJ � .4 61 1- TL 5000 G t•ta• I c � • I of I iii. ,� c1 J1 - - T- - -- - -�_ -- -� -I ' L_F I S.W. % FONNER ST. — _. -4 - _4_1_ _ _ - _ —r —I I 1 it ti 587'46'00:W 80.10' I TL 2300 TL 2200 •. °� 9 TL 6100 TL 2000 v"<:."1 7.waei w1G NSSUI CLEARANCE 1 1472• AREA IRO IGNCL/WALL) !"5 POMO 1 MOOS(A1 Z Ob 1 a is 1a7t N • u _ g 1 . 7000S2ANC a BUMPING, • WALL AG'CV1117ut$ V # Of MC ACat NSUAS p C ...a.AREA ma �. 731} -N g _—l._ -1 • - J e Nu aox�377.,a TL 6200 N GROSS O.643.113.111. ' TL 2400 I B 2 I r-isc` • l-J J °N8746'00'E au). 0 I I • 1 CITY of TIGARD T •111,- MLP2001-00014 CT'ON noABO SITE PLAN N PASSMORE PARTITION (Map is nc scale) • ., 'Y.i:' �:!:;1"7.:5:-- 5F}I✓;ti; ''i 'i�r"..L: �, . • �I�d rI.F, I I' ,I 4 NOTI:GE 0>F=TYPE±IIk'DECISION ' A1►' ,�,II ' i I �, YX, J ..,,i li^.I.� � 1 � ? I' ;�,I � t a�I I,• p S II" ken \ ` M D'q5P.'^F AR, TI.T; I O N (kl M?w:.L�t.P.n�..12i,0°0 100 1`4' ,'�•'.•,'' L%;�::;",. .CITY OFTIOARD r," .'I"ljyv, �•' vA' t„.:m,s :'Y: r.,-•v�:"'' .'d'.a.' ,1 � •A."III I'. n 5 'h7�i'14.4 I5: rl l/i1llUttt � CO PASS A s,hap;,in,o l Bryet;,terlcottp i ml n i ty" .. .a,... „ ., ..h .�_. 'nP:• .} £, ,r n1^ f „r'c=�, .'Yn ..'n. ..t. ',Nv ! ,..,!!,;. >,.1 ',L,,:.t I d, rs.r}..L n.' J.'�',..,!a: �.,.•' ,.ii• 120 DAYS =04/11/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: PASSMORE PARTITION CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2001-00014 PROPOSAL: A request to Partition one existing lot of 0.42 acres into two (2) parcels of 7,509 and 8,023 square feet. An existing single-family dwelling exists on the subject • parcel. However, the existing dwelling will be on proposed parcel #1 and will meet all applicable setbacks of the base zone. APPLICANT: Charles H. Martin OWNER: Hampton PT LLC Hampton PT Profit Sharing Trust By Thomas Fisher 944 SE Sellwood Blvd. P.O. Box 11370 Portland, OR 97202 Portland, OR 97211 ZONING DESIGNATION: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. LOCATION: 11370 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2101. PROPOSED PARCEL 1: 7,509 Square Feet. PROPOSED PARCEL 2: 8,023 Square Feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390 (Decision-Making Procedures); 18.420 (Land Partitions); 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation); 18.715 (Density Computations); 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening); 18.765 (Off-Street parking and Loading Requirements); 18.790 (Tree Removal); 18.795 (Visual Clearance Areas); 18.810 (Street and Utility • Improvement Standards). SECTION II. DECISION J' 4. i e�'as� 'hereb:` ivem-,th'at�atlie> Git• �of�,Ti''"ardL�:,C:ommuni� �D.evel o-'ieit�-',D,irecfor/s.,,desagn`ee� �..;.:....I. �1:�,�•, . t' 'The:findin s:'and conel'usions;'on+:whicli.,the:;decis on ishbased are:noted APPROVED,the above reques g, in.'the,,fulh'.decision `'available.'af City Hall f J� 4P r° �4` ! ".`..L..• � ',,.J. �J���:' . .. ,:. .. ., .. .. ..6n..,,,,,°,,. .. !'.I. ,..n'�.. ;I�,''c, ,ry, ., .,,..„�:.-. _. .ua I•,, ...' .IP�... ., r,,li l�. -.,. _',.'. I i"!°+I: i''1 '.1:• �:II :Jh�.1;' .�,.'f 1'• ''THIS'APPROVAL' SHA'L BE VA°°LID FOR�.1.8,''MONTHS • ` FR. OM J:rT� H,_ •TIV E�I•DAT.y �F�.. .rvHI., L S�D C S O N:1, .� _ 1 ... • I.I M,. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies • • Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JANUARY 11, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JANUARY 29, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. A eal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. I THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JANUARY 28, 2002. uestions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. / °`� � � ci,va nca¢o ���� � ,rsrru N111111111111i— . VICINITY MAP _, 1.011 Øj r MLP 2001-00014 rI : .i- :111. 1 E ���� � II "HIM PASSMORE PARTITION MINIS■ �: lir illip,10.1■111111: 11116 _ 4 ; , �� FAA Valli WO'�j -ell II.11111 d I Ell 1.1.104„ ���1� 111211� �i .,., � /_.' - J tu ,4 -' =yam,'.,.•.,,r�I� :: I 1111011 V. 4 NA ��! iv. •!�'►�'► A 1 111 City BfTIQUd �I' ♦* ,-* 0.4• .'12._ • ■ r Inv ..B".,-.. i TI.6. Ti.1200 j n 5100 i I 6ryy J• 1 1 x I I . P666 1 I I I I n 5000 - 466 1 I I I 46 L:-+c) I I I 146 r"-T 1' I I 1 � I 3I I I / . Tr---- -ii-----t- FT 2 ar. B.W. FONHBR TI 2300 TI.2200 J � ' ) TL 0100 n 2000 I Pail - J u« n 0x00 n 2400 j -.. . = 2 ,.(M I ■ J I Ni I ACITY OF TIGARD f MI.P200I.00014 SITE PLAN N PASSMORE PARTITION (Mavis not to scale) NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION }� MINOR LAND PARTITION CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: December 14, 2001 FILE NUMBER: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2001-00014 FILE NAME: PASSMORE PARTITION PROPOSAL: A request to Partition one existing lot of 0:42 acres into two (2) parcels of 7,509 and 8,023 square feet. An existing single-family dwelling exists on the subject parcel. However, the existing dwelling will be on proposed parcel #1 and will meet all applicable setbacks of the base zone. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 11370 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2101. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON DECEMBER 28. 2001. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 10. 2002. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. • d Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: • The application is accepted by the City • Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. • Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this•application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." •■■••,..,�, ,� CITY OI iIGAftD PINP-1/41111111 ... 'S 1111111111 VICINITY MAP a øIii!rii:Ii� • ��■111111I MLP200I-00014 1■— IP" Vries 11k" i;'r ,,,1 M' m PASSMORE PARTITION I"hr' 1Ih� rI ■IC J a� m 0 i ;;A: 1111 r.�,.��i Yr* VJSIEA ■■�•���■. iii --w"tip �f as NI.- pe„.10■1,,INI' I.■� . �._ ��� : � ;.,I�Ti 11111 ...01. ,.`,♦�''' Ai •,,.tot ■ • ..-■• CibofTig.d 1SEGU&SV• ks CoM, Jrs REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C,OF IGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: December 14,2001 TO: Gary Lampella,Building Official RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division JA N1 5 2002 STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner(x3111 ,ciTY a-TIGARD Phone: (5031639-4111/Fax: (5031684-1291 MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLP)2001-00014 ➢ PASSMORE PARTITION Q REQUEST: A request to Partition one existing lot of 0.42 acres into two (2) parcels of 7,509 and 8,023 square feet. An existing single-family dwelling exists on the subject parcel. However, the existing dwelling will be on proposed parcel #1 and will meet all applicable setbacks of the base zone. LOCATION: 11370 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2101. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: DECEMBER 28, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: — (Please provide the following information)Name of Petunia]Commenting: I Phone Numbertsl: I • S REQUEST FOR COMMENTS of I;ARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE December 14,2001 l'/ a T 11 TO: Lee Walker,CleanWater Services/SWM Program IL j DEC 1 7 2001 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner(x311) BY _,.:_... NG Phone: (5031639-4111/Fax: (5031 684-1291 .IAN 0 7 2002 MINOR LAND PARTITION(MLR 2001-00014 )=. PASSMORE PARTITION Q CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST: A request to Partition one existing lot of 0.42 acres into two (2) parcels of 7:509 and 8,023 square feet. An existing single-family dwelling exists on the subject parcel. However, the existing dwelling will be on proposed parcel #1 and will meet all applicable setbacks of the base zone. LOCATION: 11370 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2101. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: DECEMBER 28, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. P SE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: • (Tlease provide the follawing information)Name of Person(sl Commando!` I I mberisl: "�.. Phone Nu 846-1 _ I • • MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: January 4, 2002 TO: Matt Scheidegger, Assistant Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer U.-- RE: MLP 2001-00014, Passmore Partition Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: -Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a minor collector street to have a 60-foot right-of-way width and a 40-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Fonner Street, which is classified as a minor collector on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 20 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate additional ROW to provide 30 feet from centerline. The applicant's application indicates they will provide that dedication. SW Fonner Street is paved but not fully improved to City standards. TMC 18.810.030(A)(1) states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with City standards. However, 18.810.030(A)(4) states that the City may accept a future improvement guarantee in lieu of street ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2001-00014 Passmore Partition PAGE 1 • • improvements if the improvement associated with the project does not, by itself, provide a significant improvement to the street safety or capacity. Although this development will incrementally increase the amount of traffic on the roadway, the increase will not substantially degrade the level of service on the street. A street improvement adjacent to this site, therefore, will not significantly improve the safety or capacity of the street. In addition, 18.810.030(A)(1)(e) states that a guarantee in lieu of street improvements is acceptable if the proposal is a land partition on property zoned residential and the partition does not create any new streets-. This partition will not create a new street. Based on these code provisions, Staff therefore recommends that the applicant be required to enter into an agreement with the City whereby the owner agrees to participate in any future widening project for the street carried out by the City, a third party, or through a local improvement district. This agreement must be executed prior to approval of the final plat. The applicant's statement indicates they will enter into this agreement. Access to Arterials and Major Collectors: Section 18.810.030.P states that where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or major collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The design shall include any of the following: • A parallel access street along the arterial or major collector; • Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or major collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another street; • Screen planting at the rear or side property line to be contained in a nonaccess reservation along the arterial or major collector; or • Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives of this subsection; • If a lot has access to two streets with different classifications, primary access should be from the lower classification street. The applicant will serve the two lots with one joint driveway onto SW Fonner Street. This is acceptable, as there are no other access options for this site. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of- way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2001-00014 Passmore Partition PAGE 2 • • • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. PLANNING Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. PLANNING Lots -Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. PLANNING Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. PLANNING Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. By entering into the future improvement agreement for SW Fonner Street, this criterion will be met. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. ENGINEERING,COMMENTS MLP 2001-00014 Passmore Partition PAGE 3 • • Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing public sewer line located in SW Fonner Street that presently serves the existing home. A new service lateral will be provided from the main line for the new home on Parcel 2. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no upstream drainage hazards that impact this parcel. Parcel 2 will be graded and drained toward SW Fonner Street. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2001-00014 Passmore Partition PAGE 4 • Onsite detention is not required for small projects, such as partitions. The drainage for Parcel 2 can easily be directed toward SW Fonner Street where there is a roadside ditch. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. PLANNING Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. PLANNING Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. PLANNING • Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2001-00014 Passmore Partition PAGE 5 • • • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Fonner Street. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 80 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $ 2,200.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: There is a public main line in SW Fonner Street that can serve this site. The existing home is presently served and the applicant will provide a new-service to Parcel 2. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) • regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2001-00014 Passmore Partition PAGE 6 • • The CWS standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such as residential land partitions. It would be impractical to require an on-site water quality facility to accommodate treatment of the storm water from Parcel 2. Rather, the CWS standards provide that applicants should pay a fee in-lieu of constructing a facility if deemed appropriate. Staff recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on this application. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of$ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final plat. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. Survey Requirements The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: A Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the new sanitary sewer lateral, driveway approach and any other work in the ROW. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2001-00014 Passmore Partition PAGE 7 • As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). The applicant shall enter into a Street Improvement Agreement with the City whereby they agree to complete or participate in the future improvements of SW Fonner Street adjacent to the subject property, when any of the following events occur: A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the formation of a Local Improvement District, B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for in whole or in part by the City or other public agency, C. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and involves the sharing of design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s) of property in addition to the subject property, or • D. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate by the City Engineer in conjunction with construction of improvements by others adjacent to the subject site. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for all common driveways. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. . The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Fonner Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 2,200.00 and it shall be paid prior to approval of the final plat. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2001-00014 Passmore Partition PAGE 8 • • of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. Attach a check in the amount of the current final plat review fee (Contact Planning/Engineering Permit Technicians, at (503) 639-4171, ext. 426). C. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. D. The right-of-way dedication for SW Fonner Street shall be made on the final plat. E. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive a letter from the City Engineering Department indicating: 1) that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor, and 2) that the applicant has either completed any public improvements associated with the project, or has at least obtained the necessary public improvement permit from the City to complete the work. F. After the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer signature (for partitions), or City Engineer and Community Development Director signatures (for subdivisions). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: . Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a mylar copy of the recorded final plat. ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2001-00014 Passmore Partition PAGE 9 • Prior to issuance of the building permit for Parcel 2, the applicant shall pay the standard water quality and water quantity fees per lot (fee amounts will be the latest approved by CWS). • i:\eng\brianAcomments\mlp\mlp2001-00014.doc • • ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2001-00014 Passmore Partition PAGE 10 • • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI O TIIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community DATE December 14,2001 TO: ohn Roy,Properly Manager/Public Works Department RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division JAN 0 2 2002 STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner 1x3111 CITY OF TIGARD Phone: (5031639-4171/Fax: [5031684-7297 MINOR I N(MLR 2001-000 PASSMORE PARTITION REQUEST: A request to Partition one existing lot of 0.42 acres into two (2) parcels of 7,509 and 8,023 square feet. An existing single-family dwelling exists on the subject parcel. However, the existing dwelling will be on proposed parcel #1 and will meet all applicable setbacks of the base zone. LOCATION: 11370 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2101. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: DECEMBER 28, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ('lease provid the fofiawing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: I Phone Number's]: I • MEMORANDUM U.,"11 otl I fi,\ TO: Matt Schiedegger FROM: Matt Stine, City Forester RE: Passmore Partition vd(Lr2ft,f DATE: December 17, 2001 As you requested I have provided some comments on the "Passmore Partition" project. If you have any questions or concerns regarding my comments please contact me anytime. 1. TREE PROTECTION DEVICES 18.745.030 • E. PROTECTION OF EXISTING VEGETATION. Existing vegetation on a site shall be protected as much as possible: 1. The developer shall provide methods for the protection of existing vegetation to remain during the construction process; and '2. The plants to be saved shall be noted on the landscape plans (e.g., areas not to be disturbed can be fenced, as in snow fencing which can be placed around the individual trees). 1.1. All tree protection devices shall be located on the Tree Protection Plan. Any tree that will not be removed onsite that is within the limits of disturbance of this project must be protected. Any tree that is located on property adjacent to the construction project that will have more than 15% of its root system disturbed by construction activities shall also be protected. 1.2. Details and specifications are required as to how the trees will be protected on site. 1.3. Provide a construction sequence including installation and removal of tree protection devices, clearing, grading, or installation of sediment and erosion control measures, and other activities that may be required to implement the tree protection measures. .y S • 1.4. Include in the notes on the final set of plans that equipment, vehicles, machinery, dumping or storage, or other construction activities, burial, burning, or other disposal of construction materials must not be located inside of any tree protection device or outside of the limits of disturbance where trees are being protected. No grading, filling or any other construction activity may occur within the tree protection devices at any time or outside of the limits of disturbance where trees are being protected unless approved by the City Forester. 1.5. All tree protection devices shall be: • Visible. • Well-anchored. • Approved in the field prior to clearing, grading, or the beginning of construction. • Remain in place and maintained until all construction is completed and a final inspection is conducted. 1.6. To determine the size of the tree protection zone follow the guidelines listed below • For individual trees follow the trunk diameter method. For every one-inch of diameter at breast height (DBH), or 4 1/2 feet above the ground, allow 12 inches of space from the trunk of the tree. For example, a tree that is 15" at DBH must have at least 12' of tree protection zone around the entire canopy of the tree. • For groups of trees the tree protection zone must be outside of the dripline of the trees on the edge of the stand. If there are conifers with narrow crowns on the edge of the stand follow the trunk diameter method or the dripline method, whichever is greater. 1.7. Identify, on the Tree Protection Plan, the location of the stockpile area and the staging area (if different from the stockpile area). 1.8. All of this information must be included in the final plan's notes or drawings. 1.9. Specific to this project: • Protection for a 45" DBH Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) tree must be included with the protection guidelines for the other trees onsite. This tree is located behind the northwest corner of the home. 2. TREE SPECIES SELECTION & PLANTING 18.745.030 C. INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. The installation of all landscaping • shall be as follows: 1. All landscaping shall be installed according to accepted planting procedures. 2. The plant material shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nurberg Stock (ANSI Z-60, 1-1986, and any other future revisions); and 3. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. G. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF EXISTING VEGETATION. The review procedures and standards for required landscaping and screening shall be specified in the conditions of approval during development review and in no instance shall be less than that required for conventional development. 2.1. It is recommended that all tree planting follow the guidelines set forth by the International Society of Arboriculture's tree planting guidelines as well as the standards set forth in the American Institute of Architects' Architectural Graphic Standards, 10th edition. In the Architectural Graphic Standards there are guidelines for selecting and planting trees based on the soil volume and size at maturity. Additionally, there are directions for soil amendments and modifications. I recommend that these guidelines be followed and adhered to at all times. 2.2. In order to develop tree species diversity onsite it is recommended that the following guidelines be followed: • No more than 30% of any one family be planted onsite. • No more than 20% of any one genus be planted onsite. • No more than 10% of any one species be planted onsite. 2.3. I recommend that all of this information be included in the final plan's notes or drawings. If you have any questions please call me anytime. Thank you for requesting my comments on this project. • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE December 14,2001 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division DEC 1 8 2001 STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner 1x3111 CITY OF TIGARD Phone: [503)639-4171/Fax: 1503)684-1291 MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLR 2001-00014 ➢ PASSMORE PARTITION REQUEST: A request to Partition one existing lot of 0.42 acres into two (2) parcels of 7,509 and 8,023 square feet. An existing single-family dwelling exists on the subject parcel. However, the existing dwelling will be on proposed parcel #1 and will meet all applicable setbacks of the base zone. LOCATION: 11370 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2101. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: DECEMBER 28, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 1ZQawtS_) 4■502IaR, .Gl rneml fv?c A - cO0V CR SnwleA d4%.16Ati ��j/"3'C�c`1�in� ANN- kVIo l e.Sa�Ce9 - 1 J (Please provufe the foc-wing information)Name of Persons'Commenting: J . \f I Phone Humberto]: ', O • • ry �l 40 l f � REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C.OFTIGARD Community Development ShapingA Better Community DATE: December 14,2001 TO: Dennis Koellermeier,Operations Manager/Water DepartmenlECEIvED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division DEC 21 2001 STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner 0x3111 CITY OF TIGARD Phone: 15031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 MINOR LAND PARTITION(MLR 2001-00014 ➢ PASSMORE PARTITION Q REQUEST: A request to Partition one existing lot of 0.42 acres into two (2) parcels of 7,509 and 8,023 square feet. An existing single-family dwelling exists on the subject parcel. However, the existing dwelling will be on proposed parcel #1 and will meet all applicable setbacks of the base zone. LOCATION: 11370 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2101. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: DECEMBER 28, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: / ve4 c 76 4 ih chill-/ r r►.rdva0frcl retha, coreiegdoti &r v te-k. ertert �al4C4 AP) jzrat:0 of o444() 141446tete daIS), I f Z nrd ti Wu.I✓ GcrV/c, r I € ,6 .2i/d« tz/zirt ?Sig- f14/ (Bkase provi&the foffilwing information)Name of Persontsl Commenting: Phone Number's]: •• w . S * REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF IIGARD Community Deve(opment S&iapingA Better Community DATE: December 14,2001 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner[x317 Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 MINOR LAND PARTITION(MLR 2001-00014 ➢ PASSMORE PARTITION Q REQUEST: A request to Partition one existing lot of 0.42 acres into two (2) parcels of 7,509 and 8,023 square feet. An existing single-family dwelling exists on the subject parcel. However, the existing dwelling will be on proposed parcel #1 and will meet all applicable setbacks of the base zone. LOCATION: 11370 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2101. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square, feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: DECEMBER 28, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provick the fort-wing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: Phone Nembutal: • • . CITY* TIGARD REQUEST FOR COIENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: / Z / Coe,1 / FILE NAME: �� tai CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS` ,.. .. - 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA:•Central DEast ['South []West ElProposal Descrip.in Library CIT Book :Olt( .V - _ CITY OFFICES; ; /Barbara Shields,Planning Mgr. _COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPTJPIanning-Engineering Techs.�POLICE DEPTJJim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer `°CBUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official O<ENGINEERING DEPTJBrian Rager,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineera.WATER DEPTJDennis Koellermeier,Operations Mgr. CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder 4 .PUBLIC WORKS/John Roy,Property Manager IY'PUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester PLANNER—POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM-10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARIN D Isle sasreuPveTi ) VD/lL9)� 'SPECIAL.DISTRICTS`_ " ; . : - _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.* TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT*DCCLEANWATER SERVICES Planning Manager ire Marshall Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE.JURISDICTIONS,.:- CITY OF BEAVERTON* _ CITY OF TUALATIN* _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE. _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street NE _ Irish Bunnell,Development serves PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97301-1279 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE CITY OF DURHAM tit 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ Bob Knight,Data Resource Center(ZCA) US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP_333 SW First Avenue _ Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA1ZOA) Larry French(Comp.Plan Amendments Only) PO Box 2946 _CITY OF KING CITY AC _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _ C.D.Manager,Growth Management services Salem,OR 97301-2540 15300 SW 116th Avenue WASHINGTON COUNTY King City,OR 97224 _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powerlines in Area) _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division 155 N.First Avenue —CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO* Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Planning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 _Brent Curtis(CPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion(CPA) OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * Anne LaMountain(IGA/URB) CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) _Sonya Kazen,Development Review Coordinator Phil Healy(IGANRB) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir. Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacation = eve Conway(General Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Sr.Cartographer(CPA/ZCA)PAS t. 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Jim Nims(ZCA)MS 15 Portland,OR 97204 _Doria Mateja(ZCA)Ms 14 . _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A* • Jane Estes,Permit Specialist 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Portland,OR 97221-2414 UTILITY,PROVIDERS�AND SPECIAL=AGENCIES :- _ ' - `:: . : —PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington NortherrvSanta Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W.10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 . —SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R J 4NETRO AREaA��_�CQM 1iIIUNICATIONS )AT&T CABLE — TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer ° Debra Palmer(Armexations ony) Pat McGann (If Project is Within%Mile of A Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 "RORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC ‘,,A-NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY _VERIZON _ QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Jim VanKleek,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Richard Jackson,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 , nn(y AT&T-EABLE.4,..Eat r�+.d�nn — Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics&Planning Dept. (f JO.Diana Carpenter • 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street 'Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Portland,OR 97232 11t INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). - h:\patty\nasters\Request For Comments Notification List 2.doc (Revised: 7-Nov-01) PLANN!AJ6 SEC f<FLTAK�/ M A • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OF TiOARD Community rDevetpment Sfeapingit Better Community I, cPatricia L. Lunsforc4 being first duly sworn/affirm,, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of7igard Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: • {Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: MLP200I-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION IDAMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) • ® City of Tigard Planning Director • A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked EXbibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked EXIlibit'B",and by reference made a part hereof, on December 14,2001,and deposited in the United States Mail on December14,2001, postage prepaid. (Person th repared Notice) S7A?E OE (R, G0N ) County:if Was ington )ss. City of igard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the (Q day of ('.7 /!A-4 , 200St OFFICIAL SEAL W,;aM"r'•,y DIANE M JELDEW \` 1:;5' NOTARY PUBLI o- : •N • COMMISSION N• ?:: : teJLt MY COMMISSION EXPIR E'07,2003 . l NO Y PUBLIC OF RE ::; My Commission Expire . 7/7 • • • EXHIBIT A NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION _,,411;1 MINOR LAND PARTITION CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: December 14, 2001 FILE NUMBER: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2001 -00014 FILE NAME: PASSMORE PARTITION PROPOSAL: A request to Partition one existing lot of 0.42 acres into two (2) parcels of 7,509 and 8,023 square feet. An existing single-family dwelling exists on the subject parcel. However, the existing dwelling will be on proposed parcel #1 and will meet all applicable setbacks of the base zone. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 11370 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2101. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON DECEMBER 28, 2001. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 10, 2002. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. • • Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: • ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." / CITY OI TIGARD 0M---, ' . VICINITY MAP 2-Liffilliii ';_ gaol- �:�� �� MLP2001-00014 MP IN Es NI mitzaw me °` PASSMORE PARTITION ��=_.�. j�4"w ui I mieHt 1. , •1111:°: ioriii4 X1_ : :,� Eilltai .4 1 p s „'' L-4' '� i '�ei Kra- IF*■ X4,1 LI - r ....iion � �� �� ��► , X11.. L" . ♦•' ,`',,,.�,'v �_ in" C.4 ,. � ♦ AM -?.7?.7 .i* i.* 67-f, w, MI rte„` • • EXHIBIT B • 2S103bB-09400 2S103AC-04000 ABEYTA THOMAS J AND DEBORAH L BURNS RUSSELL L&LORRAINE H 11370 SW ERSTE DR 12590 SW 114TH TER TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DB-10000 2S103DB-09300 BAFIGO MICHAEL A& CLARKE JOHN G&KARYN S CELIA S 11380 SW ERSTE PL 11470 SW SONNE PL TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S103AC-06700 2S103AC-05300 BILODEAU DOUGLAS J& CONNELL JAMES J NICOLE S 12731 SW 113TH PL 12899 SW 113TH PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 103AC-0 0 2S103DB-09600 B OMES INC CULBERTSON JON C 11385 SW ERSTE PL TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103CA-00208 2S 103AC-05100 BOY-1E HOWARD W DAHLEN MARK S MARILYN K 12775 SW 113TH PL 11560 SW FONNER TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-06600 2S103AC-01503 BRADY COREY E&SUSAN K DAVIS ROBERT J 12855 SW 113TH PL 11195 SW FONNER TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DB-08800 2S103AC-04100 BREWIN SHARON F&MICHAEL K DURFEE MICHAEL D AND 11225 SW MORGAN CT BUTTERFIELD MELISSA TIGARD,OR 97223 12612 SW 114TH TERR TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DB-09800 2S103CA-00100 BRUMMETT RODNEY L&REBECCA S EDWARDS WILLIAM M 11490 SW SONNE PL PAULINE M TIGARD,OR 97223 13105 SW 115TH TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-06200 2S103AC-00600 BURGESS JAMES F&MARY B EMME LARRY M 11350 SW FONNER ST 11221 SW FONNER ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-05500 2S103AC-01504 BURK RICK R ERICKSON GEORGE W JR 12687 SW 113TH PL MARLENE IDEEN TIGARD,OR 97223 11175 SW FONNER ST TIGARD,OR 97223 • • • 2S 103AC-02400 2S 103AC-02101 FILLER DAVID E&MARY C HAMPTON PT LLC 11500 SW FONNER ST BY THOMAS FISHER PORTLAND,OR 97223 PO BOX 11370 PORTLAND,OR 97211 2S103AC-01401 2S103AC-05400 FLEMING DAVID L HELLHAKE FRANK J& 11227 SW FONNER TALBERT SHELLEY A TIGARD,OR 97223 12709 SW 113TH PL TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S 103AC-05000 2S 103AC-01400 FRANK CRAIG E&LORI A HOBBS RONALD E AND JUNE E 12797 SW 113TH PL 7205 SW VENTURA DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DB-09900 2S103AC-02200 FRANK LARRY AND ANGELA HOLMES ROBERT W • 11480 SW SONNE PLACE PO BOX 1924 TIGARD,OR 97223 KINGSTON,WA 98346 2S103AC-05200 2S103DB-09500 GARNER DANNY A&KAREN E HONEYCUTT PROPERTIES LLC 12753 SW 113TH PL 1205 SE GRAND AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97214 2S103AC-02600 103AC-0 .00 GIANOLA JEFFREY W&SHANNON L HU CREEK ESTATES 11550 SW FONNER ST OW RS 0 TS 3-6 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-04300 2S10380-09000 GOETZ JEANNE HUNTERS WOODLAND LLC 12758 SW 114TH TERRACE 4351 SW CULLEN BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97221 2S 103AC-07000 103BD-09900 GOHIER PIERRE HU RS OODLAND LLC 12955 SW 113TH PL 4351 N BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 RTLAND,OR 97221 2S103AC-06400 03BD-09100 GRECO LEONARD R HUN DLAND LLC 8151 SIMMS SL 4351 C EN BLVD ARVADA,CO 80005 RTLAND,OR 7221 2S103AC-06300 2 103BD-08900 , GRECO LEONARD R&JULIE M HU RS ODLAND LLC 11441 SW FONNER ST 4351 LEN BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 P, TLAND,OR 97221 • • 2S103BD-10100 2S103AC-07100 NTERS ODLAND LLC MUIR DIXIE R 4351 CULLEN BLVD 12977 SW 113TH PL RTLAND, R 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BD-10000 , 2S103AC-01800 HU RS ODLAND LLC NEUMANN MICHAEL F 4351 ULLEN BLVD 11200 SW FONNER STREET TLAND, R 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 103BD-10200 2S103AC-01300 H ERS ODLAND LLC OAK RICKY J&BARBARA T 4351 LLEN BLVD 11245 SW FONNER ST P TLAND, 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DB-09000 2S103DB-09200 JOHNSEN ROGER C&MAILI H PALMER ROBERT MATT& 11265 SW MORGEN CT CHILLESS TRAE E TIGARD,OR 97223 11390 SW ERSTE PL TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DB-09100 2S103AC-01100 JONES SONYA M PHELAN THOMAS C 11285 SW MORGEN CT 4504 GRANT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 VANCOUVER,WA 98660 2S103AC-07400 2S103AC-07600 K&W DEVELOPMENT INC PINE VALLEY BUILDERS INC 9155 SW RAMBLER LN 1044 TROON RD PORTLAND,OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 2S103DB-10100 2S103DB-00100 KNUTSON RICHARD AND JOYCE POTTER ERIC R 11475 SW SONNE PLACE 13030 SW 115TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-04200 2S103AC-02300 LIBERT SCOTT A AND CYNTHIA M QUIMBY ELEANOR N 12636 SW 114TH TERRACE 11480 SW FONNER ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-05800 2S 103D B-08700 LIDAY GARRY&LOUISE A ROEHRDANZ LEE J 12621 SW 113TH PL 11205 SW MORGEN CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-01701 2S103AC-01900 MORTENSEN COLIN N ROGERS PAUL LOUISE ANE 11230 SW FONNER ST 11160 SW FONNER TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 2S 103AC-07200 2S 103AC-01200 S R TURNER CONSTRUCTION LLC STARK JOHN& 8835 SW CANYON LN#408 ERVIN KIM PORTLAND,OR 97225 PO BOX 23215 PORTLAND,OR 97281 2S103AC-06900 S103AC-00900 S R TURNER CONSTRUCTION LLC& S RK JO & WILLIAMS JAMES B/CAROL L ERVI 9155 SW RAMBLER LN PO X 15 PORTLAND,OR 97223 ORTLAND,OR 97281 2S103DB-09700 2S103AC-06100 SCHOPPE PAUL&KATHRYN J THOMPSON JANET • 11395 SW ERSTE PL 11340 SW FONNER ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S103AC-01700 103BD-0870 SCHULTHEIS ERIC D& TIG D OF 11180 SW FONNER ST 1312 HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,0 97223 2S 103AC-07300 103AC-0770 SCHWEITZ ERICA& TI D OF MARTHA L 1312 HALL 12980 SW 113TH PL ARD, 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-06800 2 103BD-10 SELLICK LEE A&BETSY TIG RD ITY OF 12911 SW 113TH PL 131 W HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD, R 97223 2S103AC-05600 2 103BD-106 SHIPLEY LANE A&LUCY A TI D TY OF 12665 SW 113TH PL 131 HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 T ARD,0 97223 2S103AC-06500 2S103AC-07500 SMITH GEOFFREY K& TOM WHELCHEL BUILDERS INC JANEA 1020 SE 61ST WAY 12801 SW 113TH PL HILLSBORO,OR 97123 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103BD-04401 2S 103AC-01501 SMITH WILLIAM L& VOORHEES JOHN J MARGARET 0 KATHRYN A 33350 NE OLD PARRETT MTN RD 11145 SW FONNER RD NEWBERG,OR 97132 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BD-10700 2S103DB-08900 SM ' WILL •M L& WELCH MICHAEL& MARG 0 BREDESEN DANIELE 333-• NE • ' PARRETT MTN RD 11245 SW MORGAN CT WBERG,OR 97132 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 2S 103AC-05700 WISNER LEONARD P&KATHLEEN L 12643 SW 113TH PL TIGARD,OR 97223 HAMP'T'ON PT LLC BY THOMAS FISHER PO BOX 11370 PORTLAND OR 97211 • Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive#4 Tigard, OR 97224 Brooks Gaston 10272 SW Meadow Street Tigard, OR 97223 Don & Dorothy Erdt 13760 SW 121st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Martha Bishop 10590 SW Cook Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Vanessa Foster 13085 SW Howard Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Susan Beilke 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - CENTRAL CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT Central.doc) UPDATED: November 6, 2001 . . 4 • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING T` IG CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community • I, Patricia L. Luns{orcd being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard;Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: • (Check Appropnate Box(s)Below} © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: MLP200I-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION • ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof, on lanualy 11,2002 and deposited in the United States Mail on January 11,2002, postage prepaid. / -I erlW___} (Person that ° -•ared •tice) • STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City gig-ware Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day da of CW rC4' , 200a. • OFFICIAL SEAL DIANE M JELDERKS NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION N0.326578 � MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 �C F My Commission WI s: 9/ of £ °I�X A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2001-00014ii' CITY OF TIGARD PASSMORE PARTITION CommunityDeveropment Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS =04/11/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: PASSMORE PARTITION CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2001-00014 PROPOSAL: A request to Partition one existing lot of 0.42 acres into two (2) parcels of 7,509 and 8,023 square feet. An existing single-family dwelling exists on the subject parcel. However, the existing dwelling will be on proposed parcel #1 and will meet all applicable setbacks of the base zone. APPLICANT: Charles H. Martin OWNER: Hampton PT LLC Hampton PT Profit Sharing Trust By Thomas Fisher 944 SE Sellwood Blvd. P.O. Box 11370 Portland, OR 97202 Portland, OR 97211 ZONING DESIGNATION: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. LOCATION: 11370 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2101. PROPOSED PARCEL 1: 7,509 Square Feet. PROPOSED PARCEL 2: 8,023 Square Feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390 (Decision-Making Procedures); 18.420 (Land Partitions); 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation); 18.715 (Density Computations); 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening); 18.765 (Off-Street parking and Loading Requirements); 18.790 (Tree Removal); 18.795 (Visual Clearance Areas); 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (250 per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies 'Final Decision: I • THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JANUARY 11, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JANUARY 29, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. VA eal: ector's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JANUARY 28, 2002. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. CITY Of TIGARD ^1 la � ITSTRF —� ' VICINITY MAP V :.111_1.. ■ r. ■ = •• m . MLP200I-00014 Oir NI • �� � PASSMORE PARTITION C-Ci-0! "i l ♦�1f I I.I WI irli 1 Il I 0 III X1111111:=: III'iiin.tiPral iIIIi RI i •!i 1.� o�■�� 1 .r �►... �`I� ■■i III 11111 �.�.w -1-- .►�4 ,,,I �..11.��!��NK►� ► N 1 MI IM . • * li`' dl Clry of iigvd it 11�� �_1.■Alitliervi n 6. II.1200 j TL 5100 j .61° 2 TL 5000 OR e4 1 4' I I .eP 1 -. ee i rr— I 1--Tr----�_11-----� �T B,w FONNER eT. f e iL 7300 n 2200 )re n 61 Do Jn 2000 1 - s 6200 I n 2400 6 n 2 I I -(E I f 1 ..7,4 14 J I . . CITY OF TIGARD T MLP2001-00014 SITE PLAN N PASSMORE PARTITION (Map Is not to scale) • 2S1O3DB-59400 2S103AC-04000 • EXHIBIT ABEYTA THOMAS J AND DEBORAH L BURNS RUSSELL L&LORRAINE H 11370 SW ERSTE DR 12590 SW 114TH TER TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103DB-10000 2S 103DB-09300 BAFIGO MICHAEL A& CLARKE JOHN G&KARYN S CELIA S 11380 SW ERSTE PL 11470 SW SONNE PL TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S103AC-06700 2S103AC-05300 BILODEAU DOUGLAS J& CONNELL JAMES J NICOLE S 12731 SW 113TH PL 12899 SW 113TH PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 103AC-0 0 2S103DB-09600 B OMES INC CULBERTSON JON C 11385 SW ERSTE PL TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103CA-00208 2S103AC-05100 BOYTE HOWARD W DAHLEN MARK S MARILYN K 12775 SW 113TH PL • 11560 SW FONNER TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103AC-06600 2S 103AC-01503 BRADY COREY E&SUSAN K DAVIS ROBERT J 12855 SW 113TH PL 11195 SW FONNER TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DB-08800 2S103AC-04100 BREWIN SHARON F&MICHAEL K DURFEE MICHAEL D AND 11225 SW MORGAN CT BUTTERFIELD MELISSA TIGARD,OR 97223 12612 SW 114TH TERR TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DB-09800 2S103CA-00100 BRUMMETT RODNEY L&REBECCA S EDWARDS WILLIAM M 11490 SW SONNE PL PAULINE M TIGARD,OR 97223 13105 SW 115TH TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103AC-06200 2S 103AC-00600 BURGESS JAMES F&MARY B EMME LARRY M 11350 SW FONNER ST 11221 SW FONNER ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-05500 2S103AC-01504 BURK RICK R ERICKSON GEORGE W JR 12687 SW 113TH PL MARLENE IDEEN TIGARD,OR 97223 11175 SW FONNER ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-02400 • 2S103AC-02101 • FILLER DAVID E&MARY C HAMPTON PT LLC 11500 SW FONNER ST BY THOMAS FISHER PORTLAND,OR 97223 PO BOX 11370 PORTLAND,OR 97211 2S103AC-01401 2S103AC-05400 FLEMING DAVID L HELLHAKE FRANK J& 11227 SW FONNER TALBERT SHELLEY A TIGARD,OR 97223 12709 SW 113TH PL TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-05000 2S103AC-01400 FRANK CRAIG E&LORI A HOBBS RONALD E AND JUNE E 12797 SW 113TH PL 7205 SW VENTURA DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DB-09900 2S103AC-02200 FRANK LARRY AND ANGELA HOLMES ROBERT W 11480 SW SONNE PLACE PO BOX 1924 TIGARD,OR 97223 KINGSTON,WA 98346 2S103AC-05200 2S103DB-09500 GARNER DANNY A&KAREN E HONEYCUTT PROPERTIES LLC 12753 SW 113TH PL 1205 SE GRAND AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97214 2S103AC-02600 103AC-0 0 GIANOLA JEFFREY W&SHANNON L HU CREEK ESTATES 11550 SW FONNER ST OW RS 0 TS 3-6 - TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-04300 2S103BD-09000 GOETZ JEANNE HUNTERS WOODLAND LLC 12758 SW 114TH TERRACE 4351 SW CULLEN BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97221 2S103AC-07000 103BD-09900 GOHIER PIERRE HU RS ODLAND LLC 12955 SW 113TH PL 4351 N BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 RTLAND,OR 97221 2S103AC-06400 03BD-09100 GRECO LEONARD R HUN DLAND LLC 8151 SIMMS SL 4351 C N BLVD ARVADA,CO 80005 RTLAND,OR 7221 2S103AC-06300 2 103B0-08900 , GRECO LEONARD R&JULIE M HU S ODLAND LLC 11441 SW FONNER ST 4351 LEN BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 P, TLAND,OR 97221 10100 • 2S103AC-07100 • 2S1036D i NTERS ODLAND LLC MUIR DIXIE R 4351 CULLEN BLVD 12977 SW 113TH PL RTLAND, R 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BD-10000 , 2S103AC-01800 HU RS ODLAND LLC NEUMANN MICHAEL F 4351 ULLEN BLVD 11200 SW FONNER STREET TLAND, R 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 103BD-10200 2S103AC-01300 H ERS O DLAND LLC OAK RICKY J&BARBARA T 4351 LLEN BLVD 11245 SW FONNER ST P TLAND, 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DB-09000 2S103DB-09200 JOHNSEN ROGER C&MAILI H PALMER ROBERT MATT& 11265 SW MORGEN CT CHILLESS TRAE E TIGARD,OR 97223 11390 SW ERSTE PL TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DB-09100 2S103AC-01100 JONES SONYA M PHELAN THOMAS C 11285 SW MORGEN CT 4504 GRANT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 VANCOUVER,WA 98660 2S 103AC-07400 2S 103AC-07600 K&W DEVELOPMENT INC PINE VALLEY BUILDERS INC 9155 SW RAMBLER LN 1044 TROON RD PORTLAND,OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 2S103DB-10100 2S1030B-00100 KNUTSON RICHARD AND JOYCE POTTER ERIC R 11475 SW SONNE PLACE 13030 SW 115TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-04200 2S103AC-02300 LIBERT SCOTT A AND CYNTHIA M QUIMBY ELEANOR N 12636 SW 114TH TERRACE 11480 SW FONNER ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-05800 2S103DB-08700 LIDAY GARRY&LOUISE A ROEHRDANZ LEE J 12621 SW 113TH PL 11205 SW MORGEN CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-01701 2S103AC-01900 MORTENSEN COLIN N ROGERS PAUL LOUISE ANE 11230 SW FONNER ST 11160 SW FONNER TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 2S 103AC-07200 2S 103AC-01200 S R TURNER CONSTRUCTION LLC STARK JOHN& 8835 SW CANYON LN#408 ERVIN KIM PORTLAND,OR 97225 PO BOX 23215 PORTLAND,OR 97281 2S103AC-06900 103AC-00900 S R TURNER CONSTRUCTION LLC& S RK JO & WILLIAMS JAMES B/CAROL L ERVI 9155 SW RAMBLER LN PO X 15 PORTLAND,OR 97223 ORTLAND,OR 97281 2S103DB-09700 2S103AC-06100 SCHOPPE PAUL&KATHRYN J THOMPSON JANET • 11395 SW ERSTE PL 11340 SW FONNER ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-01700 103BD-0870 SCHULTHEIS ERIC D& TIG D OF 11180 SW FONNER ST 1312 HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,0 97223 2S103AC-07300 103AC-0770 SCHWEITZ ERIC A& TI D OF MARTHA L 1312 HALL • 12980 SW 113TH PL RD, 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-06800 2 103BD-10 SELLICK LEE A&BETSY TIG D ITY OF 12911 SW 113TH PL 131 W HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD, R 97223 2S103AC-05600 103BD-10 SHIPLEY LANE A&LUCY A TI D TY OF 12665 SW 113TH PL 131 HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 T ARD,0 97223 2S103AC-06500 2S103AC-07500 SMITH GEOFFREY K& TOM WHELCHEL BUILDERS INC JANEA 1020 SE 61ST WAY 12801 SW 113TH PL HILLSBORO,OR 97123 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103BD-04401 2S 103AC-01501 SMITH WILLIAM L& VOORHEES JOHN J MARGARET 0 KATHRYN A 33350 NE OLD PARRETT MTN RD 11145 SW FONNER RD NEWBERG,OR 97132 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103BD-10700 2S 103DB-08900 SM WILL M L& WELCH MICHAEL& MARG 0 BREDESEN DANIELE 33 NE PARRETT MTN RD 11245 SW MORGAN CT WBERG,OR 97132 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S103AC45700 WISNER LEONARD P&KATHLEEN L 12643 SW 113TH PL TIGARD,OR 97223 • • S Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive#4 Tigard, OR 97224 Brooks Gaston 10272 SW Meadow Street Tigard, OR 97223 Don & Dorothy Erdt 13760 SW 121st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Martha Bishop 10590 SW Cook Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Vanessa Foster 13085 SW Howard Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Susan Beilke 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - CENTRAL CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT Central.doc) UPDATED: November 6, 2001 S • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING `A. 7h1 CITY OF TIGARD Community cDeveropment SliapingA Better Community 1, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of7gard Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: • (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) • NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director • A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked EXhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked EXhibit'B", and by reference made a part hereof, on January 11,2002,and deposited in the United States Mail on January 11,2002, postage prepaid. • • • (1.* ;41;/--;-9 (' • • (Person that repared Notice STATE OF OEGON ) County of ff Was ington )ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the of l /�C��'l 20 �� day r%��a , 0A. • .. OFFICIAL SEAL mss. . DIANE PA JELDERKS / NOTARY PUBUGOREGON n•,. COMMISSION NO.326578 .MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 , ` �. / iI I I I ' 4: 'Iir.. • My Commission Exiii :. 0 • • S S EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2001-0001412 CITY OF TIGARD PASSMORE PARTITION CommunityDeveCopment Shaping Better Community 120 DAYS =04/11/2002 • SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: PASSMORE PARTITION CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2001-00014 PROPOSAL: A request to Partition one existing lot of 0.42 acres into two (2) parcels of 7,509 and 8,023 square feet. An existing single-family dwelling exists on the subject parcel. However, the existing dwelling will be on proposed parcel #1 and will meet all applicable setbacks of the base zone. APPLICANT: Charles H. Martin OWNER: Hampton PT LLC Hampton PT Profit Sharing Trust By Thomas Fisher 944 SE Sellwood Blvd. P.O. Box 11370 Portland, OR 97202 Portland, OR 97211 ZONING DESIGNATION: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. LOCATION: 11370 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2101. PROPOSED PARCEL 1: 7,509 Square Feet. PROPOSED PARCEL 2: 8,023 Square Feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390 (Decision-Making .Procedures); 18.420 (Land Partitions); 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation); 18.715 (Density Computations); 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening); 18.765 (Off-Street parking and Loading Requirements); 18.790 (Tree Removal); 18.795 (Visual Clearance Areas); 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section V. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 1 OF 14 • • • • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: Submit the following to the Planning Department (Mathew Scheidegger 639-4171, x317) for review and approval: 1. Provide documentation that a reciprocal easement ensuring access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. 2. Provide a plan showing street trees planted along the proposed access to parcel #2 according to Section 18.745.040.C. of the Tigard Development Code. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 3. A Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the new sanitary sewer lateral, driveway approach and any other work in the ROW. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 4. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 5. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). 6. The applicant shall enter into a Street Improvement Agreement with the City whereby they agree to complete or participate in the future improvements of SW Fonner Street adjacent to the subject property, when any of the following events occur: A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the formation of a Local Improvement District, B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for in whole or in part by the City or other public agency, C. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and involves the sharing of design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s) of property in addition to the subject property, or D. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate by the City Engineer in conjunction with construction of improvements by others adjacent to the subject site. 7. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for all common driveways. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. 8. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Fonner Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $2,200.00 and it shall be paid prior to approval of the final plat. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 2 OF 14 i 9. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. 10. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. Attach a check in the amount of the current final plat review fee (Contact Planning/Engineering Permit Technicians, at (503) 639-4171, ext. 426). C. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. D. The right-of-way dedication for SW Fonner Street shall be made on the final plat. E. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive a letter from the City Engineering Department indicating: 1) that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor, and 2) that the applicant has either completed any public improvements associated with the project, or has at least obtained the necessary public improvement permit from the City to complete the work. F. After the City and.County have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer signature (for partitions), or City Engineer and Community Development Director signatures (for subdivisions). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 11. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a mylar copy of the recorded final plat. 12. Prior to issuance of the building permit for Parcel 2, the applicant shall pay the standard water quality and water quantity fees per lot (fee amounts will be the latest approved by CWS). THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION NOTED UNDER THE PROCESS AND APPEAL SECTION OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Property History: The subject parcel is located within the City of Tigard. The property is designated Low Density Residential on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map. A record search indicates a minor land partition was approved on 10/29/98 (MLP98-00011). The decision was re-issued 11/5/98 due to an incorrect appeal date. However, the partition expired without the applicant meeting all the conditions. Site Information and Proposal Descriptions The subject property is approximately 18.295 square feet. The site has approximately 80 feet of frontage on SW Fonner Street. The owner is proposing a 2-parcel partition as indicated on the proposed partition plat. Parcel #1 (7,509 square feet) Parcel #2 (8,023 square feet). A single-family residence exists on Parcel #1, which is proposed to remain. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 3 OF 14 S SECTION IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were received. SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Land Partitions (18.420): The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; The proposed partition will comply with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations at the time of proposed development as demonstrated both by the analysis presented within this administrative decision and by this application and review process through compliance with the conditions of approval. Therefore, this criterion is met. There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal; Public facilities are discussed in detail later in this decision under Chapter 18.810 (Street & Utility Improvement Standards). Based on the analysis provided herein, Staff finds that adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal. Therefore, this criterion is met. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards; and The public facilities and proposed improvements are discussed and conditioned later in this decision under Chapter 18.810 (Street & Utility Improvement Standards). Improvements will be reviewed as part of the permit process and during construction, at which time the appropriate review authority will insure that City and applicable agency standards are met. Based on the analysis in this decision, Staff finds that this criterion is met. All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below: The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. The minimum lot width required for the R-4.5 zoning district is 50 feet. The smallest of the lots has a minimum width of 65.08 feet. Therefore, this standard has been met. The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area. The minimum lot area requirement in the R-4.5 zoning district is 7,500 square feet. The proposed partition creates three (2) lots that are 7,509 and 8,023 square feet respectively. The remaining 2,763 square feet will be used for the access and right-of-way dedication along SW Fonner Street. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. • Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access easement. The proposed partition plat demonstrates that each lot will have frontage onto a public right-of-way. Parcel #1 has 65.08 feet of frontage onto SW Fonner Street and Parcel #2 has 15 feet of frontage onto the proposed access, which connects to SW Fonner Street. Therefore, this standard has been met. Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. No development is proposed with this application. The existing home on Parcel #1 has a front yard setback of 27 feet. The rear yard setback is 45 feet, the east side yard setback is 18 feet and the west side yard setback is 5.9 feet. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 4 OF 14 • Proposed Lot #2 is a flag lot. However, no development is proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard will be reviewed when building permits are issued. A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. The applicant indicates in the narrative that the access drive will be screened from the adjoining property to the west with a 5-foot fence. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities. Fire district regulations are reviewed at the time of development. This criterion shall be addressed at that time. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. The applicant has proposed a shared driveway. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide documentation that a reciprocal easement ensuring access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. Any access way shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation. This standard is addressed under 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation) later in this decision. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred year floodplain, the city shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. The partitioned lots are not adjacent to a one-hundred-year floodplain. Therefore, this standard does not apply. An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in accordance with Chapter 18.370, Variances and Adjustments. The applications for the partition and variance(s)/adjustment(s) will be processed concurrently. No variances or adjustments have been submitted with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the Minor Land Partition Standards have not been met. CONDTION: Provide documentation that a reciprocal easement ensuring access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. Residential Zoning Districts (18.510): Development standards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2 below: NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 5 OF 14 S TABLE 18.510.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES STANDARD R-4.5 Minimum Lot Size - Detached unit 7,500 sq. ft. - Duplexes 10,000 sq. ft. - Attached unit [1] Average Minimum Lot Width - Detached unit lots 50 ft. - Duplex lots 90 ft. -Attached unit lots Maximum Lot Coverage - Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 20 ft. - Side facing street on corner& through lots 15 ft. - Side yard 5ft. - Rear yard 15 ft. - Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district - Distance between property line and front of garage 20 ft. Maximum Height 30 ft. Minimum Landscape Requirement - [1]Single-family attached residential units permitted at one dwelling per lot with no more that five attached units in one grouping. [2]Lot coverage includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. * Multiple-family dwelling unit ** Single-family dwelling unit A minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet is required for each lot. The proposed lot sizes of 7,509 and 8,023 square feet meet this standard. Parcel #1 is developed with an existing single-family home that is approximately 27.10 feet from the front property line. The side yard setbacks are 5.99 feet from the western property line and 18.52 feet from the eastern property line. The rear and setback is 45.40 feet, which meets the setback standards of the R-7 zoning district. Setback standards, required by Table 18.510.2 will apply to all future development of the proposed lots. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Residential Zoning District Standards have been met. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Continuing obligation of property owner. The provisions and maintenance of access and egress stipulated in this title are continuing requirements or the use of any structure or parcel of real property in the City. The applicant has been conditioned earlier in this decision under Chapter 18.420 (Land Partitions) to provide copies of access maintenance agreements for the proposed private drive. Therefore, this criterion has been met. Access Plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented an approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided a site plan showing a 15-foot-wide access used for access, egress and circulation for both lots. Joint Access. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 6 OF 14 S • Both proposed lots will take access off of the proposed private drive. Access maintenance agreements have been conditioned earlier in this decision under Chapter 18.420 (Land Partitions). Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approve by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. Both parcels will have access onto SW Fonner Street, by a 15-foot access drive. Therefore, this standard has been met. Inadequate or hazardous access. Applications for building permits shall be referred to the Commission for review when, in the opinion of the Director, the access proposed: Would cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or would provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or would in any other way cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. Direct individual access to arterial or collector streets from single-family dwellings and duplex lots shall be discouraged. Direct access to major collector or arterial streets shall be considered only if there is no practical alternative way to access the site. In no case shall the design of the service drive or drives require or facilitate the backward movement or other maneuvering of a vehicle within a street, other than an alley. Single-family and duplex dwellings are exempt from this requirement. According to Engineering Staff, additional traffic at this location and the placement of the proposed access drive will not create or increase a hazardous condition. They proposed access drive is approximately 190 feet from the intersection of SW Fonner Street and 113 Place and 50 feet from the adjacent driveway to the west. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Minimum access requirements for residential use. Private residential access drives shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Fire Code. This standard will be address under the "Agency Comments" section of this decision. Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus by one of the following: a) A circular, paved surface having a minimum turn radius measured from center point to outside edge of 35 feet; b) A hammerhead- configured, paved surface with each leg of the hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a minimum width of 20 feet; c) The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is 5%. The site plan shows the access drive to be 113 feet in length. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds the Access, Egress and Circulation Standards have been met. Density Computations (18.715): A. Definition of net development area. Net development area, in acres, shall be determined by subtracting the following land area(s) from the gross acres, which is all of the land included in the legal description of the property to be developed: 1. All sensitive land areas: a. Land within the 100-year floodplain; b. Land or slopes exceeding 25%; c. Drainage ways; and d. Wetlands. 2. All land dedicated to the public for park purposes; 3. All land dedicated for public rights-of-way. When actual information is not available, the following formulas may be used: a. Single-family development: allocate 20% of gross acreage; b. Multi-family development: allocate 15% of gross acreage. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 7 OF 14 • • 4. All land proposed for private streets; and 5. A lot of at least the size required by the applicable base zoning district, if an existing dwelling is to remain on the site. B. Calculating maximum number of residential units. To calculate the maximum number of residential- units per net acre, divide the number of square feet in the net acres by the minimum number of square feet required for each lot in the applicable zoning district. C. Calculating minimum number of residential units. As required by Section 18.510.040, the minimum number of residential units per net acre shall be calculated by multiplying the maximum number of units determined in Subsection B above by 80% (0.8). The standards for Density computation deal with the intensity of residential land uses, usually stated as the number of housing units per acre. The total square footage of the subject property is 18,295 square feet. However, the square footage of Parcel #1 (7,509 square feet) is subtracted from the calculation because it is developed with a pre-existing single-family home. Other subtracted square footage is 1,695 square feet for the proposed access and 800 square feet for additional right-of-way needed to bring SW Fonner Street up to City standards. Therefore, density is calculated from a total square footage of 8,291 square feet. Minimum lot size for the R-4.5 zone is 7,500 square feet, which requires the maximum allowable density to be no more than 1 unit. The proposed partition creates 1 additional lot from the pre-existing home. Therefore, this standard has been met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Density Computation Standards have been met. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street trees: Section 18.745.040 Section 18.745.040.A.: All development projects fronting on a public street, private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040C. The proposed partition has 80 feet of frontage on SW Fonner Street. Therefore, no street trees are required along SW Fonner Street. However, the private drive is approximately 113 feet in length. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing street trees planted along the proposed access to parcel #2 according to Section 18.745.040.C. of the Tigard Development Code. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet the standard the applicant shall satisfy the following condition: CONDITION:Provide a plan showing street trees planted along the proposed access to parcel #2 according to Section 18.745.040.C. of the Tigard Development Code. Tree Removal (18.790): A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot„ parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. The applicant has indicated that there are a total of 16 trees over 12-inches in diameter located on the proposed site. Two 18-inch trees equaling 36-inches will be removed as a result of this partition. Therefore, 87.5% of the trees 12 inches and greater will be retained. According to the mitigation standards of the above code, "retention of 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation." Therefore, this standard does not apply. However, if additional trees are to be removed, the applicant will be subject to the mitigation standards of the Development Code. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Tree Removal Standards have been met. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 8 OF 14 • • Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): This Chapter requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight 8 feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight 8 feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a -foot distance points with a straight line. The site plan does not show any obstructions within the visual clearance triangle for the access drive. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the Vision Clearance Standards have been met. IMPACT STUDY (18.390.040): Requires that the applicant shall include an impact study. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication of real property interest, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. The applicant has proposed to dedicate 801 square feet of right- of-way along SW Fonner Street. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $7,062 ($2,260 divided by .32).The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the collector and arterial street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is $4,802. The applicant has agreed to enter into an agreement with the City whereby the owner agrees to participate in any future widening project for the street carried out by the City, a third party, or through a local improvement district. The cost of the improvements is expected to be $4,603 (801 square feet x $3.00 per square foot, $2,403 + 80 feet x $27.50 for underground utilities), thus it meets the rough proportionality test. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a minor collector street to have a 60-foot right-of-way width and a 40-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground Utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 9 OF 14 • • This site lies adjacent to SW Fonner Street, which is classified as a minor collector on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 20 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate additional ROW to provide 30 feet from centerline. The applicant's application indicates they will provide that dedication. SW Fonner Street is paved but not fully improved to City standards. TMC 18.810.030(A) 1) states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with Ci standards. However, 18.810.030(A)(4) states that the City may accept a future improvement guarantee in lieu of street improvements if the improvement associated with the project does not, by itself, provide a significant improvement to the street safety or capacity. Although this development will incrementally increase the amount of traffic on the roadway, the increase will not substantially degrade the level of service on the street. A street improvement adjacent to this site, therefore, will not significantly improve the safety or capacity of the street. In addition, 18.810.030(A)(1)(e) states that a guarantee in lieu of street improvements is acceptable if the proposal is a land partition on property zoned residential and the partition does not create any new streets. This partition will not create a new street. Based on these code provisions, Staff therefore recommends that the applicant be required to enter into an agreement with the City whereby the owner agrees to participate in any future.widening project for the street carried out by the City, a third party, or through a local improvement district. This agreement must be executed prior to approval of the final plat. The applicant's statement indicates they will enter into this agreement. Access to Arterials and Major Collectors: Section 18.810.030.P states that where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or major collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The design shall include any of the following: • A parallel access street along the arterial or major collector; • Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or major collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another street; • Screen planting at the rear or side property line to be contained in a nonaccess reservation along the arterial or major collector; or • Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives of this subsection; • If a lot has access to two streets with different classifications, primary access should be from the lower classification street. The applicant will serve the two lots with one joint driveway onto SW Fonner Street. This is acceptable, as there are no other access options for this site. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. No blocks are created or effected by the partitioning of the subject property. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 10 OF 14 • . No blocks are created or effected by the partitioning of the subject property. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. Neither of the proposed lots are 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the R-4.5 zoning district. The depth of the lots are not more than 2.5 times the average lot width. The average lot width for both lots is 72.5 feet with an average depth of 108 feet. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. The proposed lots have frontage on SW Fonner Street. Proposed lot#1 has approximately 65.08 feet of frontage and proposed lot #2 has approximately 15.02 feet of frontage through an 15.02-foot driveway. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. By entering into the future improvement agreement for SW Fonner Street, this criterion will be met. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing public sewer line located in SW Fonner Street, that presently serves the existing home. A new service lateral will be provided from the main line for the new home on Parcel 2. • Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments) . There are no upstream drainage hazards that impact this parcel. Parcel 2 will be graded and drained toward SW Fonner Street. • Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 11 OF 14 • • In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. Onsite detention is not required for small projects, such as partitions. The drainage for Parcel 2 can easily be directed toward SW Fonner Street where there is a roadside ditch. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeway/pedestrian path is required at this location. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. Not applicable. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. Not applicable. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 12 OF 14 • • There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Fonner Street. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 80 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $2,200.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: There is a ublic main line in SW Fonner Street that can serve this site. The existing home is presently served and the applicant will provide a new service to Parcel 2. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The CWS standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such as residential land partitions. It would be impractical to require an on-site water quality facility to accommodate treatment of the storm water from Parcel 2. Rather, the CWS standards provide that applicants should.pay a fee in- lieu of constructing a facility if deemed appropriate. Staff recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on this application. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final plat. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. Survey Requirements The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comment: • Request signage or monument at foot of shared driveway identifying the two residences. City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comment: • Provide a fire hydrant within 500 feet of all portions of proposed construction for both parcels. City of Tigard Operations Department has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: • Developer to be invoiced for removal/relocation of existing water meter to property. • Locate new water services out of driveway (landscape only). Lot 2 may need 1" water service and water meter due to service length. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 13 OF 14 • • SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to it. SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JANUARY 11, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JANUARY 29, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. VA eal: ector's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment eriod. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JANUARY 28, 2002. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. �—� January 11, 2002 PREPARED BY: a ew - - _ - -• DATE Assistant Planner January 11, 2002 APPROVE BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Planning Manager i/curpin/mathew/mlp/mIp2001-000014.dec NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2001-00014/PASSMORE PARTITION PAGE 14 OF 14 0 CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM UT STREET VICINITY MAP "gag __J■ BILN=■A ;T • —a ■a1111■=111 .ions IML200100014 - .4 . SWERROLST ■■1■ 11111110 PASSMORE PARTITION 7 ■a /� .p. Irpv%-ANI ST 111111111L 1 O4 ! /�fAVLots 1111111;44, "I'. EPR-J-r--- � �BUIL RTT::59{!� QP4 aONRA! �D ( sin BEEF SENO RD,l/, DURHMI_j RO / . P t \x1I Ir111.111 if/ !�� Tlpard Area Mep 111. 101.1 J I*111A0C) 200 400 600 Feet •. \, -, ,•=400 feet 4IPL>a � � a ♦ ♦ *1151 City of Tigard �♦ �� -o•ti I'r 713111 MI RA Infortnebon on thrs mep la for general location ony end G09`'1' :11111.1111, ■ should be verified with the Development Services Division. .4# n 13125 SW Hell Blvd ■ ■ Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171� -^ _ hltp:/Avww.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date: Dec 13,2001;C:Unagic\MAGIC03.APR TL 6. IL 1200 I TL 5100 ® i 2 01 � �I g .4 / 6i TL 5000 G ,4�� I 441/4 LAL—L J . I i l ' L_ J j T---- - 1--..w-. 1 -T - -- - L ST. F___ ____4__t_._. -L " • K L 58T46'OO,W 80.10' f�3- - - IL 2300 TL 2200 � '- ' V 1 IL 6100 TL 2000 '''/ ✓" Tsa1 yl{ I — 7 ARIA a FEN IE Iasq' 4RCA MD rtNCr/wAU) —av� cla N AC W g fi i 0 TO W664 SCI EMNC k BUFFCRINQ : L' WALL L S' BO DO WALL ALONG BOTN 90[S '.7 Of MC POLE:WSUU QCAR4NCC ARC4 WILL C SC YAINTAWLD. !� 8 i' a112 Sn - J 2 TL 6200 I 825 4033,75.q.% i CROSS 8,8'5.63.q.lt i TL 2400 2 I • C BSTINS SHOD RE TO f"' BC WOWlA J N8T48'OVE 8030' 6 I 1 ___ _______. ,OF CITY or gro T1 krtD CITY OF TIGARD MLP2001-00014 SITE PLAN N PASSMORE PARTITION (Map is not to scale) . EXHIBIT B Charles H. Martin, Co-Trustee Hampton PT Profit Sharing Trust MLP2001-00014 944 SE Sellwood Blvd. PASSMORE PARTITION Portland, OR 97202 Hampton PT LLC By Thomas Fisher PO Box 11370 Portland, OR 97211 T"' T-• CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM• AREA NOTIFIED I ______cc) . .r_. (.0 �, ,,,,, ,m1°° (500') r- 511310 .., nmu°nm mlmmm. mum= "`"'°' '�`°" =MOM / FOR: Chuck Martin °=,3333°3 ntm3°en1 atmmisn * .5i -N I n» °° RE: 2S 103AC, 2101 mum= r— 2010140111100 mum= "limn nionnis 3 mmmoea OC nm113m° J) 1201010001100 J r - Property owner Information is valid for 3 months from • \ the date printed on this map. °1am1 \\\\ \ nnn . 11Lm010110 `i'MIZ. m1nn= .•*35310000 nnmem110 ` �� \�\\! x133051°0 201038031100 • -r . mamma N. MOM=MOM= nonnoun nwm°o°t nnunnop \ 0030331 °° I 51330300 0 mm1°nm Jo fillm°m v . m° 7503000T100 ,c�` — I-- ,�,�3 • nnl3mma atanearno NE foam 301315051 *53°2150 10131001700 n10ae0Mm A N 10133°30° 4!fl1O30I0*S00 • •=maw 21"3" 0 100 200 300 Feet 1110,3 1 205 feet *5*103525*00 V N CT 10onmw 1033133 0 V^ 0 CAt'ma10 gmn .i of Ti gard 9, 2 • Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd �I Tigard,OR 97223 5 t� http://www ci.t gard.orus . . .. . Community Development Plot date:Nov 13,2001;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR 2S10308-09400 • 2S103AC-04000 • ABEYTA THOMAS J AND DEBORAH L BURNS RUSSELL L&LORRAINE H 11370 SW ERSTE DR 12590 SW 114TH TER TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103DB-10000 2S 103DB-09300 BAFIGO MICHAEL A& CLARKE JOHN G&KARYN S CELIA S 11380 SW ERSTE PL 11470 SW SONNE PL TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S 103AC-06700 2S 103AC-05300 BILODEAU DOUGLAS J& CONNELL JAMES J NICOLE S 12731 SW 113TH PL 12899 SW 113TH PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 103AC-0 0 2S103DB-09600 B OMES INC CULBERTSON JON C 11385 SW ERSTE PL TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103CA-00208 2S103AC-05100 BOYTE HOWARD W DAHLEN MARK S MARILYN K 12775 SW 113TH PL 11560 SW FONNER TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103AC-06600 2S 103AC-01503 BRADY COREY E&SUSAN K DAVIS ROBERT J 12855 SW 113TH PL 11195 SW FONNER TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1030B-08800 2S103AC-04100 BREWIN SHARON F&MICHAEL K DURFEE MICHAEL D AND 11225 SW MORGAN CT BUTTERFIELD MELISSA TIGARD,OR 97223 12612 SW 114TH TERR TIGARD,OR 97223 2S10308-09800 2S103CA-00100 BRUMMETT RODNEY L&REBECCA S EDWARDS WILLIAM M 11490 SW SONNE PL PAULINE M TIGARD,OR 97223 13105 SW 115TH TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-06200 2S103AC-00600 BURGESS JAMES F&MARY B EMME LARRY M 11350 SW FONNER ST 11221 SW FONNER ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-05500 2S103AC-01504 BURK RICK R ERICKSON GEORGE W JR 12687 SW 113TH PL MARLENE IDEEN TIGARD,OR 97223 11175 SW FONNER ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-02400 • 2S103AC-02101 • FILLER DAVID E&MARY C HAMPTON PT LLC 11500 SW FONNER ST BY THOMAS FISHER PORTLAND,OR 97223 PO BOX 11370 PORTLAND,OR 97211 2S103AC-01401 2S103AC-05400 FLEMING DAVID L HELLHAKE FRANK J& 11227 SW FONNER TALBERT SHELLEY A TIGARD,OR 97223 12709 SW 113TH PL TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-05000 2S103AC-01400 FRANK CRAIG E&LORI A HOBBS RONALD E AND JUNE E 12797 SW 113TH PL 7205 SW VENTURA DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DB-09900 2S103AC-02200 FRANK LARRY AND ANGELA HOLMES ROBERT W 11480 SW SONNE PLACE PO BOX 1924 TIGARD,OR 97223 KINGSTON,WA 98346 2S103AC-05200 2S103DB-09500 GARNER DANNY A&KAREN E HONEYCUTT PROPERTIES LLC 12753 SW 113TH PL 1205 SE GRAND AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97214 2S103AC-02600 103AC-0 00 GIANOLA JEFFREY W&SHANNON L HU CREEK ESTATES 11550 SW FONNER ST OW RS 0 TS 3-6 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103AC-04300 2S103BD-09000 GOETZ JEANNE HUNTERS WOODLAND LLC 12758 SW 114TH TERRACE 4351 SW CULLEN BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97221 2S103AC-07000 103BD-09900 GORIER PIERRE HU RS OODLAND LLC 12955 SW 113TH PL 4351 N BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 RTLAND,OR 97221 2S103AC-06400 103BD-09100 GRECO LEONARD R HU DLAND LLC 8151 SIMMS SL 4351 C N BLVD ARVADA,CO 80005 RTLAND,OR 7221 2S103AC-06300 103BD-08900 , GRECO LEONARD R&JULIE M HU S ODLAND LLC 11441 SW FONNER ST 4351 LEN BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 P, TLAND,OR 97221 1 2S103BD-10100 • 2S103AC-07100 • NTERS ODLAND LLC MUIR DIXIE R 4351 CULLEN BLVD 12977 SW 113TH PL RTLAND, R 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BD-10000 , 2S103AC-01800 HU RS ODLAND LLC NEUMANN MICHAEL F 4351 ULLEN BLVD 11200 SW FONNER STREET TLAND, R 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 103BD-10200 2S103AC-01300 H ERS DLAND LLC OAK RICKY J&BARBARA T 4351 LLEN BLVD 11245 SW FONNER ST P TLAND, 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DB-09000 2S103DB-09200 JOHNSEN ROGER C&MAILI H PALMER ROBERT MATT& 11265 SW MORGEN CT CHILLESS TRAE E TIGARD,OR 97223 11390 SW ERSTE PL TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DB-09100 2S103AC-01100 JONES SONYA M PHELAN THOMAS C 11285 SW MORGEN CT 4504 GRANT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 VANCOUVER,WA 98660 2S 103AC-07400 2S 103AC-07600 K&W DEVELOPMENT INC PINE VALLEY BUILDERS INC 9155 SW RAMBLER LN - 1044 TROON RD ' PORTLAND,OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 2S103DB-10100 2S1030B-00100 KNUTSON RICHARD AND JOYCE POTTER ERIC R 11475 SW SONNE PLACE 13030 SW 115TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-04200 2S103AC-02300 LIBERT SCOTT A AND CYNTHIA M QUIMBY ELEANOR N 12636 SW 114TH TERRACE 11480 SW FONNER ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-05800 2S103DB-08700 LIDAY GARRY&LOUISE A ROEHRDANZ LEE J 12621 SW 113TH PL 11205 SW MORGEN CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-01701 2S103AC-01900 MORTENSEN COLIN N ROGERS PAUL LOUISE ANE 11230 SW FONNER ST 11160 SW FONNER TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 2S103AC-07200 2S103AC-01200 • S R TURNER CONSTRUCTION LLC STARK JOHN& 8835 SW CANYON LN#408 ERVIN KIM PORTLAND,OR 97225 PO BOX 23215 PORTLAND,OR 97281 2S 103AC-06900 103AC-00900 S R TURNER CONSTRUCTION LLC& S RK JO & WILLIAMS JAMES B/CAROL L ERVI 9155 SW RAMBLER LN PO X 15 PORTLAND,OR 97223 ORTLAND,OR 97281 2S103DB-09700 2S103AC-06100 SCHOPPE PAUL&KATHRYN J THOMPSON JANET • 11395 SW ERSTE PL 11340 SW FONNER ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-01700 103BD-0870 SCHULTHEIS ERIC D& TIG D OF 11180 SW FONNER ST 1312 HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,0 97223 2S 103AC-07300 2 103AC-0770 SCHWEITZ ERIC A& TI D OF MARTHA L 1312 HALL 12980 SW 113TH PL RD, 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AC-06800 2 103BD-10 SELLICK LEE A&BETSY ' TIG D ITY OF 12911 SW 113TH PL 131 W HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD, 97223 2S103AC-05600 103BD-10 SHIPLEY LANE A&LUCY A TI D TY OF 12665 SW 113TH PL 131 HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 T ARD,0 97223 2S103AC-06500 2S103AC-07500 SMITH GEOFFREY K& TOM WHELCHEL BUILDERS INC JANEA 1020 SE 61ST WAY 12801 SW 113TH PL HILLSBORO,OR 97123 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BD-04401 2S103AC-01501 SMITH WILLIAM L& VOORHEES JOHN J MARGARET 0 KATHRYN A 33350 NE OLD PARRETT MTN RD 11145 SW FONNER RD NEWBERG,OR 97132 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BD-10700 2S103DB-08900 S WILL •M L& WELCH MICHAEL& MARG 0 BREDESEN DANIELE 333-• NE 9 e.PARRETT MTN RD 11245 SW MORGAN CT • WBERG,OR 97132 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 2S103AC-05700 WISNER LEONARD P&KATHLEEN L 12643 SW 113TH PL TIGARD,OR 97223 • • Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive#4 Tigard, OR 97224 Brooks Gaston 10272 SW Meadow Street Tigard, OR 97223 Don & Dorothy Erdt 13760 SW 121st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Martha Bishop 10590 SW Cook Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Vanessa Foster 13085 SW Howard Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Susan Beilke 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - CENTRAL CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup labels\CIT Central.doc) UPDATED: November 6, 2001 • CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT t PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF TIGARD Community(Deve(opment 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD Shaping A<Better Community TIGARD, OREGON 91223 • PHONE: 503-639-4171 EAX: 503-684-1291(Attn: Patty or Shidey/Planning) '•EQUEST tO.R i110 lOOT ! RfHT !OWNEB1 AIIiIN i Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (.e. IS134A6,Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW and INCLUDE A MAP OF ALL LOTS FOR THE PROJECT (preferably assessor's tax map): /7X `,f 2/0 / /747, —2- g/ 63i (_ /13 7-is INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTING 2 OR 3 SETS OF LABELS: l-t,-* (NOTE: A minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided to place on your 2 sets of envelopes that applicants are required to submit at the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood meeting is required and you have not yet held that meeting,you should request 3 sets) NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: L11i /�A,64/ PHONE:(5°-3) 381.1 This request may be mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum fog processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request it "Will Call" by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE—TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Desaip ion: $11 to generate the mailing list, plus $2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels (20 addresses per sheet). Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. *EXAMPLE* * -* COST FOR THIS REQUEST * * A_sheets of labels x$2/sheet = $8.00 x L sets = $16.00 sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet = $ x sets = 1_ sheets of labels x$2/sheet for CIT area x sets = $ 4.00 / sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet for CIT area = sets = $ 1 GENERATE LIST = $1100 (1 LIST = $ TOTAS. 4./1.0 I TOTAL = Receipt #: 27200100000000004490 Date: 11/13/2001 T I D E M A R K COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due MISC Miscellaneous Fees&Charges-27.0000 @$1.00 100-0000-451000 $27.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Cash CHUCK MARTIN $27.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $27.00 e • • • • • illill CITY OF TIGARD OREGON December 12, 2001 Charles H. Martin 944 SE Sellwood Blvd. Portland, OR 97202 Dear,Mr. Martin: RE: Notice of Complete Application Submittal — MLP2001-00014 The City has reviewed your submittal material and finds that your application is complete. Staff will now review your application for Land Partition Approval. A decision will be rendered within 5-6 weeks. I am available to answer questions and otherwise assist you as may be required at 503-639-4171, extension 317. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. If I am not available, please leave your name and phone number so that I can call you as soon as possible. Sincerely, . Ma he - eidegg- Assistant Planner i:\curpin\mathew\mIp2001-00014.acc.doc c: MLP2001-00014 Land Use File 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 ( Design Group LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL inc. RECFRIF7r. r"¢ ANNING Date: 12-5-01 2001 To: Matt Scheidegger DEC F; City of Tigard PLANNERS CITY 'f F TIGARD Firm: Community Development ENGINEERS 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Address: Tigard, OR 97223 SURVEYORS Phone No.: (503) 639-4171 (LDC)Job No.: 2297 HILLSBORO,OR Project Name: 2-Lot Minor Partition (CORPORATE OFFICE) Toll Free: 877.648.4061 www.ldcdesign.com We are sending you: ® Attached ❑ Under Separate Cover 3300 NW 211TH TERRACE HILLSBORO,OR 97124 Copies Description PHONE: 503.858.4242 FAX: 503.645.5500 1. Response to Notice of Incompletion Letter BELLEVUE,WA 12 11x17 Revised Preliminary Grading and Utility Plan PHONE: 425.468.0245 12 24x36 Revised Preliminary Grading and Utility Plan FAX: 425.462.1374 VANCOUVER,WA 1 8.5x11 Revised Preliminary Grading and Utility Plan PHONE: 360.573.0370 FAX: 360.573.0390 These are being transmitted as indicated below: ® As Requested ❑ For Your Use ❑ For Approval ❑ Other AFFILIATED COMPANIES Comments: KLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. HILLSBORO,OR Dear Matt Scheidegger, PHONE: 503.858.4242 FAX: 503.645.5500 The following attachments are in regard to your Notice of CTS ENGINEERS, INC. Incomplete Application Submittal MLP2001-00014 letter. Please (a WBE/DBE Firm) contact me if you have any questions at 503-858-4242. Thank you. www.ctsengineers.com BELLEVUE,WA Sincerely, PHONE: 425.455.7622 FAX: 425.462.1374 Lauren Bradstreet HILLSBORO, OR PHONE: 503.690.8080 FAX: 503.645.5500 Signature: MECKEL ENGINEERING Title: Assistant Planner &SURVEYING,INC. • www.meckel.com CC: COEUR D'ALENE, ID PHONE: 208.667.4638 FAX: 208.664.3347 • •LD D esi n � Group P • Inc. December 5, 2001 PLANNERS • City of Tigard ENGINEERS Community Development 13125 SW Hall Boulevard SURVEYORS Tigard, OR 97233 ATTN: Matt Scheidegger, Assistant Planner HILLSBORO, OR RE: Notice of Incomplete Application Submittal—MLP2001-00014 (CORPORATE OFFICE) TOLL FREE:877.648.4061 www.ldcdesign.com Dear Mr. Scheidegger: 3300 NW 211TH TERRACE HILLSBORO,OR 97124 This letter is provided in response to your November 29, 2001 "Notice of PHONE: 503.858.4242 Incomplete Application" letter to document completion of the requested FAX: 503.645.5500 item as follows. BELLEVUE, WA PHONE:425.468.0245 • Drainage from the new lot (Parcel 2) will be directed down the FAX:425.462.1374 proposed shared driveway into the ditch located along SW Fonner VANCOUVER, WA Street via catch basin and 10" storm drainage pipe (Refer to PHONE: 360.573.0370 FAX:360.573.0390 revised Preliminary Grading and Utility Plan). This letter is provided for your records to document the required additional information needed for the 2-Lot minor land partition AFFILIATED COMPANIES application. Please feel free to contact me at (503) 858-4242 if you have KLEIN CONSULTING any further questions. ENGINEERS, INC. HILLSBORO,OR PHONE: 503.858.4242 Sincerely, FAx: 503.645.5500 A CTS ENGINEERS,INC. 4.0 (A WBE/DBE FIRM) Lauren Bradstreet www.ctseng i neers.com Assistant Planner BELLEVUE,WA PHONE:425.455.7622 FAX:425.462.1374 HILLSBORO,OR PHONE: 503.690.8080 FAX:503.645.5500 MECKEL ENGINEERING &SURVEYING, INC. www.meckel.com COEUR D'ALENE, ID PHONE:208.667.4638 FAx:208.664.3347 P:\Projecis\2297\DOCS\Report s\2 2971 ncom plete le tier.doc , • I V 1 g 1• w LEGEND f- v a 1 j S =SEND DEOD000S TRL2 TO ROOM "���� I I • ENBTero EVERGREEN TREE m REMAIN yp TL 5000 p� I r� I e CIMINO 0(OD000S NU TO BE REMOVED ,a*45 (��T� �I IesT2 Ia0 ..- •..�..,. EXISTING!'coNTOUR R O' �1 I�V• r] I M EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING !'CONUa W E MAILBOX RB ®MT BEGINS ( )p( ) 587'46'00"W UTILITY POLE I WATER METER 1 80.10' —� II 1 AR APPLE TO BE —— ———— C/5 I L_—— IS Bwa 2 I awl I n REMOVED q b n E140 14011Y CE = .110w z _•�— .—...Pl—. �''�-_ _--�oRfvEw ------ --- •98... n.7•.�acAUPwnR S•ENTR U y 1,i ..- • v., • 7P.rte Y"CAUPE•FEET ABOVE WOUND LEVEL) O l a 0• --74 RARR 2...".01 ►•..._...I� ..w�mi .99 CL ° d - e•RA 7.•RAID ]••RATER — 1•'WARR':.,:..:_ `.......7,00 W °~ Q'with { 1:;;x'�'''':�. °" —•ter ESQIE:EXISTING DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE TO BE ♦ OA-3 EXISTING 3 ES 0 a O?. 1>i;`��. i', f 101 FLOW IMPROVED PER OTT a YARD, {V�} g INSTALL C8 ., �ITCII E4 TL 2200 l�` FASTING ^'P•) IL 2000a 3 '. 11 T II CULVERT WATER G INSTALL SANITARY l'\ •`A' :`%r, HYDRANT SERER STUB ' 11:" . 1 • INSTALL DOUBLE ' .31ia'I 10'1RDE R.0.W.DEDICATION V WATER METER I,'?c'y:'i'::<," J z 10,y,i,.ic;':;I`.. EXISTIND !1 To R0UEEMUN;;. TL 6100 >g EXISTING ; EDP or I'',,,,t'' .....t'' GRAVEL ....t. _ O5 DRIVEWAY 1.� - "_-1' - EXISTING 1 ` 1°4'21 to ' 1 F+- I 1C yw. I't MGH 1 10 4..,,,,:' •,..( ;' N° STONE WALL i� OS•"1:: ,�• 3 ow--� R DRIVEWAY e I�'d O IMPROVEMENTS C- ••` {T�' O �,,S., CLOTHES hp� y., ' • FLOW LINE• ONES F1 a p ——I EXISTING S s•NIGH •': CRAINUNK FENCE ' 100.,•.. ...,.t TL 6200 2g 1 (TYP.) RI 0 �CH-2s •m., GRAPHIC SCALE ELLUrcel] I,-%p—De:• EXISTING v • + Surveyor SHED to I VIM wR.ua I.., 2s(r•--�BE REMOVED ; . etleRiel COON T. I .,.....- --?90.., 1RRR.ee M1 _.i? ( ) C.i •'(J u.rr...W Pa WAY 1..40' 97 I4, OUT ma N87'46'00'E I 80.10' v3 II • r--44 c hhyd IV ist CITY OF TIGARD OREGON November 29, 2001 Charles H. Martin 944 SE Sellwood Blvd. Portland, OR 97202 Dear Mr. Martin: RE: Notice of Incomplete Application Submittal — MLP2001-00014 The City has not received the information necessary to begin the review of your Minor Land Partition application. Staff has, therefore, deemed your application submittal as incomplete. In order for staff to proceed, the following materials will need to be submitted: • Show how the new lot will be drained. (i.e. pipe across parcel 1 to flow line of ditch?) I am available to answer questions and otherwise assist you as may be required at 503-639-4171, extension 317. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. If I am not available, please leave your name and phone number so that I can call you as soon as possible. Sincerely, Mathew Scheidegger Assistant Planner i:\curpin\mathewM1p2001-00014.acc c: MLP2001-00014 Land Use File • 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 i 0• PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN CHCKLIST Project: P}sM„le.E. PPR.Tt"ftonl FOR Date: t t(20∎10% LAND USE APPLICATION SUBMITTALS 11 ❑ COMPLETE ['INCOMPLETE Existing and proposed contours shown. []' Are adjacent parcels impacted by proposed grading? ❑ Yes [rlo Adjacent parcel grades shown. STREET ISSUES . J Right-of-way clearly shown? [� Centerline of street clearly shown? j( Name of street(s) shown? _J,A Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown? Profiles of proposed,EITAr• Future Streets Plan provided? (subdivisions and some partitions) ❑ profiles ❑ topo shown on adjacent property? ❑ 'a Traffic study required/submitted? [r Do proposed street grades comply with City standards? [ K Widths of proposed public streets shown? [' Widths of streets appropriate? . Are private streets proposed? ❑ under 6 lot minimum? ❑ width appropriate? [other: �..tt i- r,Tpt,S T tMu Std A qtr tMPR.o./Gk t*sc . 4- 1 -- CV-- r ITARY SEWER ISSUES Existing/proposed lines shown? Stubs to adjacent parcels required? WATER ISSUES Existing/proposed lines w/sizes noted? . Existing/proposed fire hydrants? Er Proposed meter location and size shown? • Proposed fire protection system shown? M DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines?— 140; it • `' 1 w"-`- 6 • iG• , PiPG /a- Preliminary sizing calculation of water quality and/or detention provided? P(41457 14512c42— I T° Water quality and/or detention facility shown on plan? F1-01,-) L OI1QI ? ❑ does area provided match calculations for size requirement? P' Stubs to adjacent properties required? pc Water quality and/or detention shown outside of any wetland buffer? i:tengtbriannrnasterslpublic facility plan checklist.doc REVISED: 03/13/01 RSOPOML/A/ARR4i1 V€ I • Design C '''' DC Grou _....) P Inc. • PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS APPLICANT'S STATEMENT HILLSBORO, OR For (CORPORATE OFFICE) TOLL FREE:877.648.4061 www.ldcdesign.com 2-Lot Minor Land Partition 3300 NW 211TH TERRACE HILLSBORO,OR 97124 PHONE: 503.858.4242 FAX: 503.645.5500 BELLEVUE, WA PHONE:425.468.0245 FAX:425.462.1374 Tax Lot 2101, Tax Map 2S1-3AC VANCOUVER, WA PHONE: 360.573.0370 City of Tigard, Oregon FAX:360.573.0390 AFFILIATED COMPANIES KLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. HILLSBORO,OR PHONE: 503.858.4242 FAX:503.645.5500 APPLICANT: CTS ENGINEERS, INC. (A WBE/DBE FIRM) www.ctsengineers.com Hampton PT Profit Sharing Trust BELLEVUE,WA Charles H. Martin, Co-Trustee PHONE:425.455.7622 FAX:425.462.1374 944 SE Sellwood Boulevard HILLSBORO,OR Portland, OR 97202 PHONE: 503.690.8080 FAX: 503.645.5500 MECKEL ENGINEERING &SURVEYING, INC. www.meckel.com COEUR D'ALENE, ID PHONE:208.667.4638 FAx:208.664.3347 • • 2-LOT MINOR LAND PARTITION TABLE OF CONTENTS • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM AND FEE MI IIIPRE-APPLICATION NOTES . APPLICANT'S STATEMENT 4 EXHIBITS RECEIVED PLANNING NOV 13 2001 CITY OF TIGARD Table of Contents-1 Olgesemir pl. j • • A, LAND PARTITION "- �4y ''�. TYPE H APPLICATION A.CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP.HELD WITH: 43 tg510 I DATE OF PRE-APP.: . ? El-0 Property Address/Location(s): 11370 SW Fonner Si- _ ;,'FOR(STAFF USE�ONLY'.: __: Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): 2S103AC-02101 f A 1:4,Case.No.-(s):.9'IL Q.O0 " . ;1. -- : ::::-- ':Other,Case:No: s '(""f :: Site Size: 0.42 Receipt>No.: ' ::Application Accepted y.-:` : : - -:: ,,. Applicant*: Charles H. Martin ;Date A 61:,,,- .: . Address: 944 S.E. Sellwood Blvd. City/State: Portland, OR Zip: 97202 Date Determined Complete,jai: :; .dl Primary Contact: same as above Rev;8/21/2001 .; is\curpin\masterstrevised\andpart.doc.; Phone: (503) 236-3895 Fax: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: (Attach list if more than one) Hampton PT Profit Sharing Trust REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will not be accepted Address:944 S.E. Sel'wood B1vdehone: (503) 236-38c.5 without the required submittal elements) City/State: Portland, OR Zip: 97202 1 Application Form *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant .21 Owner's Signature/Written Authorization must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written ,—,/ authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written t!J Title Transfer Instrument or Deed authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space Copy of Pre-Application Conf. Notes provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. Site/Plot Plan (#of copies based on pre-app check list) PROPOSAL SUMMARY e Site/Plot Plan (reduced 81/2"x 11") VfThe owners of record of the subject property request permission to Applicant's Statement allow a Land Partition to: (#of copies based on pre-app check list) [� CWS Service Provider Letter divide �� into Q 121 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped (total area) (#of parcels) containing ' 1)50g. #10 Envelopes.& Copy of 500' Property €. and g i ,c�J`- Owner List Generated by the City (sq. ft. or acres) (sq. ft. or acres) 4.-A Filing Fee (City) $ 780.00 (provide any additional information here) (Urban) , $2,480.00 1 • List any VARIANCE OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements"box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this day of ,20 Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 st an VARIANCE OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as.part of this application:..:..: ..... .:.� .,: , . ..•• N/A • ' •.. . , • . . . _ . . . . . . . ... . . • . : . • • • • • _ . . . . . . . . . . . . • . , . . . • . .. _ . PPLICANTS: consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL EZ� as scribed on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements"box. • 4=11111313, . etailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) fE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: k e; .. .__ -,.:riM:. . 1[, • •-• • L i ; *1 • • . 1 • '• ; ' - 1 •=..t• L*.1!I !•1 , III - fI. !a: I!. I tit! • • iII • • y! 9 •1 1. . ! - . =RIM • :r.. If the appacation is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all ,-;,;.,. •condlons and limitations of the approval. - • --____... _.. f the above statements and the-statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false, r. . The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. . SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this 1 7 day of 4 -- j _}g _ . Amer's • _Ad( i aa52--‘ZT-i‘..e.___ - Signature Owne. s Signature 411 • ern Signature •Owner's Signature • 2 , _ I `• r • • • •, ,.. ,pvur,:.� 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 CITY OF TIGARD • • • GENERAL INFORMATLQN PRE-APP.HELD WITH: w\ . ../- t _ DATE OF_PRE-AP_P.: • t_ (3.1 f Property Address/Location(s): 11370 SW FONNER STREET TIGARD, OREGON 97223 FOR STAFFL1SEO►R9lLX • :,.. ;:. _. isOr)Tax Map& Tax Lot#(s): TAX MAP 2S1-03AC TAX LOT 210 . . . _ .' :•.: }v . ry: .M.•. 1:><•V.•}•:.. v ;n;i'%:i�Y'. Site Size: 0 . 42 ACRES _ Case No.(s): Other Case No.(s): Hampton F'r' Profit Sharing '�?'::::Ni •i. Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)•: .. r`F' g Receipt No: %i': r ": :i' Address: . 944 SE Sellwood Boulevard Phone: 503) 236-3695 •Application Aide,. ^-' ;: :It.-- City: Portland, Oregon Zip: 97202 Date: , _ Charles H. Martin, Co-Trustee <<; :,;: r S 3 0 r ' !3Y• ine To`Be Completig .i .>: ::•.:: ems_ '��y{ 4`-1 . S t t•11 p ne: ?- ro. ` :. v :<;.:.. r• Y..k. -4tig A �<.;..: >�? ` 0...--(16,......4 - - ,. .::;}saz?!�',�Sir.:::;:mod}:�.�i^-:�.,:4�^•.3�...;�}:}..�.?. . .Y::Z:::�'�. 910 Zip: q-7 .o&-- `• mp PlanlZone Designation: - •1h„en the owner and the applicant are different people,p the a• . .�,•s�::: Receipt #: 27200100000000004516 U ----�""�—�► Date: 11/14/2001 NEt7P17 TIDEMARK COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due MLP2001-00014 [LANDUS]MLP Application Fee 100-0000-438000 $780.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Check RAGEN MACKENZIE 0 24002519 0 $780.00 _ __ TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $780.00 0 1111 CITY OF TIGARD A • ' PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES Zieltik. CM OT MAIM OREQ011 Community'Development (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid forSix (6) Months) srraprngA'Better Community RESIDENTIAL PRE APP.to G.DAiE: g//g STAFF AT PRE.APP.: APPLICANT: _ ,-<1. i_., AGENT: - -4 1; /4t 1` Phone: ( ) I Phone: 3 ��- � �/ PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: // � 9 A) / z _-z-t - TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): 4-7 5 103/3('_ 0 Z/©/ NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: _ • _�f2... __ _� -� • PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: _ _ ---__ ---r:07E� COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: i- cc. , , c. j F- p,4p,,t i�4 ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: - - e(S CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM (C.I.T.) AREA: e. ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18. .s/0 l ■IA, MINIMUM LOT SIZE:35-61:73 sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: 5-0 ft. Max. building height: 3D ft. ''41 Setbacks: Front . ft. Side ft. Rear /s--- ft. Corner /3—ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: ---%-- Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: -%. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] THE. APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR, AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. • * NOT E: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans . Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page I of 10 R,,iden l Appl*,uon/Phoning Drnion kaiun A • -di;/ NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.3901 The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. 4-- IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 , As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. 'I ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.105 and 18.1651 Minimum number of accesses: ` Minimum access width: S Maximum access width:. .. Minimum pavement width: 'O WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7051 Within all ATTACHED HOUSING (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each residential dwelling SHALL BE CONNECTED BY WALKWAY TO THE VEHICULAR PARKING AREA, COMMON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION FACILITIES. no RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATION (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7151-SEE EXAMPLE BELOW. The NET RESIDENTIAL UNITS ALLOWED on a particular site may be calculated by dividing the net area of the developable land by the minimum number of square feet required per dwelling unit as specified by the applicable zoning designation. Net development area is calculated by subtracting the following land area(s) from the gross site area: All sensitive lands areas including: ➢ Land within the 100-year floodplain; ➢ Slopes exceeding 25%; ➢ Drainageways; and ➢ Wetlands for the R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 zoning districts. • • Public right-of-way dedication: ➢ Single-family allocate 20% of gross acres for public facilities; or ➢ Multi-family allocate 15% of gross acres for public facilities; or ➢ If available, the actual public facility square footage can be used for deduction- `EXAMPLE OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATIONS: EXAMPLE: USING A ONE ACRE SITE IN THE R-12 ZONE(3,050 M . M LO SIZE)WITH NO DEDUCTION FOR SENSITIVE LANDS .. Single-Family �-z Multi-Family 43,560 sq. ft. of gross site area V 43,560 sq. ft. of gross site area 8.712 sq. ft. (20%)for public right-of-way 6.534 sq. ft. (15%)for public right-of-way NET: 34,848 square feet NET: 37,026 square feet 3,050(minimum lot area) = 3.050(minimum lot area) 11.4 Units Per Acre = 12.1 Units Per Acre *The Development Code requires that the net site area exist for the next whole dwelling unit NO ROUNDING UP IS PERMITTED- *Minimum Project Density is 80%of the maximum allowed density.TO DETERMINE THIS STANDARD,MULTIPLY THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS BY.8. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 10 'Aesdentul AppLuuon/Plennmc Dimon Section SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.7301 D STREETS: feet from the centerline of D FLAG LOT: A TEN (10)-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK applies to all primary structures. D ZERO LOT LINE LOTS: A minimum of a ten (10)-foot separation shall be maintained between each dwelling unit or garage. • MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL building separation standards apply within multiple-family residential developments. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES UP TO 528 SQUARE FEET in size may be permitted on lots less than 2.5 acres in size. Five (5)-foot minimum setback from side and rear lot lines. ACCESSORY STRUCTURE UP TO 1,000 SQUARE FEET on parcels of at least 2.5 acres in size. [See applicable zoning district for the primary structures'setback requirements.] FLAG LOT BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7301 MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 1% STORIES or 25 feet, whichever is less in most zones; 21/2 stories, or 35 feet in R-7, R-12, R-25 or R-40 zones provided that the standards of Section 18.730.010.C.2 are satisfied. ,.y,' a BUFFERING AND SCREENING [Refer to Code Chapter 183451 In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the CITY REQUIRES LANDSCAPED BUFFER AREAS along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.705) STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1551 Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a-clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177- . • CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 10 Andrntial Apph(Jnon/Plannint Dm,an kaion 0 -• gat,Ai' PARKING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.765&18.705r _--- M ALL PARKING AREAS AND DRIVEWAYS MUST BE PA P. - - ➢ Single-fariiily Requires: One (1) ff-street parking space per dwelling unit; and One 1) space per unit less than 500 square feet. ➢ Multiple-family Requires: . spaces per unit for 1-5edroom; . 1.5 spaces per unit for 2 bedrooms; and 1.75 spaces per unit for 3 bedrooms. Multi-family dwelling units with more than ten (10) required spaces shall provide -parking for the use of guests and shall consist of 15% of the total required parking. NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet. 6 inches X 18 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Compact parking,space dimensions: 7 feet. 6 inches X 16 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Handicapped parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. -A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.7651 BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. SENSITIVE LANDS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7151 The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO.----ARE-A --WIT -HE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAN,D7AREAS SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will a. empt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference,.based • available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identi sensitive land areas . •e • •oundaries is the ressonsibilit of the a••licant. Areas • meeting the definitions of sensitive lands mus •_ clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development app(ff'cafion. Chapter 18.775 also provides regula ions for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPME T IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.775.080.C1 When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses e approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. T report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommen (ions for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. o,/,' UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY(USA)BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to R g 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 31 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 10 t,denial Applialwn/Pltnnint O,vs on Seaion • • TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: USA DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION & ORDER 96-44 `SLOPE:ADJACENT'-' : , °: ,WIDTH'OF VEGETATED..: SENSITIVE AREA"DEFINITION a TO SENSITIVE AREA.: CORRIDOR'PER • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% 10 to <50 acres 15 feet >50 to <100 acres • 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres • • • Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% $ 10 to <50 acres 30 feet • >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine(break in • Natural lakes and ponds <-25% slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine' Starting point for meastrement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the USA Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: - IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. USA Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a USA Service • Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, USA must still issue a letter stating a USA Service Provider Letter is not required. SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7801 SIGN PERMITS MU T BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelin Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standar may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 10 Attidtnoil Appliuoon/PLnnine Dnnnn Seaton • . THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: • • Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; • Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; • Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; • Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation;• • ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. - TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. MITIGATION (Refer to Code Section 18.790.0601] REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: • The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be • viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. • XI CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7951 The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. • CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 10 Aesdennil Applioiion/Phnning Orvisim kwon • WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT [Refer to de Section 18.797.0301 The WATER RESOURCES (WR) ERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intend d to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specificall , this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and object) e standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve Otive plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats;, and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Re•ources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). T -se provisions require that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. e Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more that'll.°b 9 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-: ARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less th. 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs). • ➢ Major streams in- -Tigard include 'ANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY *REEKS) AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARI G STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard incl de Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain sho ributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORI TALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the s me as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). ➢ The standard TUALATIN RIVER R PARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter.. ) ➢ The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.797.1001 The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE • - -SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIA S 'BACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces of -rwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major str-:m resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian veget. on in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eli•ibilit for Ri•arian Setb. k in Disturbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A ' ' • ' • ► ETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially . turbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the egetation Study required by Section 18.797.100 that demonstrates all of the following: • Native plant species currently cov•r less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; The tree canopy currently cover less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed fr., the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; • That vegetation was not removed cntrary to the provisions of Section 18.797.100 regulating removal of native plant species; CIfY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 10 0.ndrntul Appiutwn/Pl nning Dnbwn Srawn 4110 . • ➢ That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and D The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. . FUTURE STREET PLAN AND EXTENSION OF STREETS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.030.FJ A FUTURE STREET PLAN shall: D Be filed by the applicant in conjunction with an application for a subdivision or partition. The • plan shall show the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division and shall include boundaries of the proposed land division and shall include other parcels within 200 feet surrounding and adjacent to the proposed land division. D Identify existing or proposed bus routes, pullouts or other transit facilities, bicycle routes and . pedestrian facilities on or within 500 feet of the site. Where necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. BLOCKS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.0901 The perimeter of BLOCKS FORMED BY STREETS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1,800 FEET measured along the right-of-way line except where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development: When block lengths greater than 330 feet are permitted, pedestrian/bikeways shall be provided through the block. CODE CHAPTERS 18.330(Conditional Use) 18.620(ligard Triangle Design Standards) 18.165(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) 18.340(Directors Interpretation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) 18.115(Sensitive Lands Review) 18.350(Planned Development) 6)`18.105(Access/Egress/Circulation) 18.780 (Signs) 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.110(Accessory Residential Units) 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) 18.370(Vanances/Adjustments) `18.115(Density Computations) 12�1 8.190(Tree Removal) 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) 1 8.120(Design Compatibility Standards) C .,_18.195(visual Clearance Areas) Q� 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) 18.125(Environmental Performance Standards) 18.191(water Resources(WR)Overlay District) - ` 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) 18.198(Wireless Communication Facilities) • 18.410(Lot tine Adjustments) 18.140(Historic Overlay) C .18.810(Street 8 Utility Improvement Standards) 6'?---' 18.420(Land Partitions) 18.142(Home Occupation Permits) 18.430(Subdivisions) 7i_._ .- 18.145(Landscaping 8 Screening Standards) J-__ 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.150(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) 18.520(Commercial inning District) _ 18.155(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) . _._ 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) - 18.160(Nonconforming Situations) (IIV Of FIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 10 Andrnwt Apptanwn/Phnnwg Donlon Stow i ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: • • � - - �1� • • • • • PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. • Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 4:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. (ITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 10 Rnidrntal Applkktion/%tnnint Division Section • The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public . hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all la se decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review proces Is availaLJ from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications .requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION (County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-8884) PRIOR TO SUBMITTING. A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, applicants are required to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not• be accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. BUILDING PERMITS . • PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by • the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings • or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a • waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a _prospective. applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). / PREPARED BY: I ' • CITY OF ARD P .N` o • ION - STAFF PERSt• 0 ; NG PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4111 FAX: (503) 684-7291 E-MAIL (staffs first name)@a.tigard.or.us TITLE 18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE)INTERNET ADDRESS: ci.tigard.or.us H:\patty\Wasters\Pre-App Notes Residential.doc Updated: 18-Jan-2001 (Engineering section:preapp-eng) CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes • Page 10 of 10 Resident d Applicriion/Phnnmg Division Seaton • . S CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefull in con'unction with the notes •rovided to ou at the •re- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an.application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named .•w at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: Date: C ?/Z 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed #10 envelopes for all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (#10), addressed with 1" x 4" labels (see envelope submittal requirements). Property owner mailing lists must be prepared by the City for a minimal fee (see request for 500' property owner mailing list form). Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B:2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): • Vicinity Map ❑ Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan c- Existing Conditions Map ❑ Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan E Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Site Development Plan ❑ Architectural Drawings �. Landscape Plan ❑ Sign Drawings ° Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FORtAN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES 1Z COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. • City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 Y i • 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis ❑ Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility • ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other • 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural -drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 8% x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area • ❑ • Contour lines (2'intervals for 0-10%slopes or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ • Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ • Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils • ❑ • Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with >_6" caliper measured 4'from ground level ❑ • Location and type of noise sources ❑ • Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ • Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 • • Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ Scale, north arrow and date ❑ • Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided • Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10% grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands and marsh areas The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and-dimensions, and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ • Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan • The owner of the subject parcel ❑ • The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines ❑ • Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ • Contour lines (2' intervals for slopes 0-10%or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑. • Location,width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ • Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25'of all property lines ❑ • Location and width of all water courses ❑ • Location of any trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4'above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ • Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ • Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ • • • City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 • • O • Site Development Plan • The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ • Contour line intervals ❑ • The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • • Outdoor common areas s. ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ ♦ Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ • The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: _ • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25'of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ • Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ Landscape Plan • • Location of trees to be removed ❑ • Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ • General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ • Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ • Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan • Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ • A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 • • • • Grading/Erosion Control Plan The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan • The location of all areas subject Ito inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location,width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings • Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ i:\;curpla\masters\revised\checklist.doc 5-Jun-00 • City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 • PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION` Q Citydmmgard,Oregon Development Shaping'A Better Community PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Maptsl: 2S1 03AC Tax Lottsl: 2101 Use Type: MLP The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ® SW Fonner Street to 30 feet from centerline (minor collector) ❑ SW to feet • ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet Street improvements: ® 1/2' street improvements will be necessary along SW Fonner Street, to include: • 20 feet of pavement from centerline to curb ® concrete curb ® storm sewers and other underground utilities ® 5-foot concrete sidewalk on south side. ® street trees spaced per TDC standards ® street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application CoEderence Notes Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department Section El Other: The dellpment code allows an exception • residential partitions, where an • applicant can propose o enter into a restrictive covenant for future street improvements. The applicant must indicate what they are willing to do. The TDC states that a development must have access to an improved street. If the applicant does not wish to improve the street now, the only other option is the restrictive covenant. C.. ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement (l concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: • ❑ feet of pavement • ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement CITY OF TICARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section ❑ concrete curb • • • ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) SW Fonner Street(This option was mentioned above). (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: ® Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing-overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW Fonner Street. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located in SW Fonner Street. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to extend sewer services to both lots (unless the existing house is already served). Water Supply: The City of Tigard (Phone:(503) 639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applicatlon Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section Tualatin Valley Fire and Ripe District (South Division) [ContaEric McMullen, (503) 612-7010] • provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The istrict should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. The applicant must show how both lots will be drained to an approved drainage system. If both lots can be drained to the roadside ditch, and if the applicant's engineer can show that the ditch has sufficient capacity to handle the additional flow from the new house, then that option would be acceptable. This assumes the applicant does not construct the half-street improvement. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee.in-lieu*will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of.new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: • ❑ Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ® Payment of the fee in-lieu. For the new house only. Payable at building permit issuance. Other Comments: • All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. • Stulzty Piuvcad l anR N TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section In 1990, Washington Countiliopted a county-wide Traffic Impaikee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic ' Irripact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. Pay T1F for new house only. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. This type of permit requires $150.00 fee. . In certain cases, where City costs may exceed the $150.00 fee, an administrative deposit will be required. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. This type of permit requires a deposit to be submitted with the construction plans. The amount of the deposit depends upon the overall value of the public improvements. The City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applicatlon Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section Building Division Permits: • • The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%; as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: Sf lO( ENGINEERING DEP MENT STAFF Phone: [5031639-4171 Fax: [5031684-7297 is\engtbrianr\templates\preap notes-eng.dot CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section - , . • • A PRE-APPLICATION ti�til CONFERENCE REQUEST CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION l n �� S� � �L � °--FOR STAFF USE ONLY :'•Applicant: tiw,� �1_LC �� tir _ i : ''''Address: et`.1`( S - Szllt.,,•..,,A (31,,r,t Phone:�SO3�--3c. - 3515 Case No:: �'�"I:. : . :, City: ?wv"fl 012 Zip: 91 z.a z_ ,, Receipt ■o:- ."6: }' r?\ :.4r , . Application Accept d By 1.6 ,_ Contact Person: C�, t. N�a,�K Phone:(533 13‘ 3 reg.- ti , , 1 Date � �' ?���. Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): 5Gtw.e_ :: cr DATE=OFPRE-APP :e-:: J. '' ---i = - '•,<` TIME-OF`PRE-APP::',A0:t° - Address: Phone: . .. ,;. .;•; PRE-APP:.HELD WITH:- City: Zip: ,Rev 12/6/2000=;is\curpin\masters\revised\P.re-App;Request;doc Property Address/Location(s): V\'"1 a S w `—UV\rO✓ REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will not be accepted without the required submittal elements) Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): -2-- S 0=.3 (1-c- — oZ1ot ( 'Ri .S) - Fr Pre-Application Conf. Request Form Site Size: a 41— a cve�. / 2 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: IN Brief Description of the Proposal and PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION any site-specific questions/issues that you would like to have staff research prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are required to be submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a O Site Plan. The site plan must show the minimum of one (1) week prior to officially scheduling a proposed lots and/or building layouts pre-application conference date/time to allow staff ample time to drawn the subject scale.property show the location tthe of the subject property in relation to the prepare for the meeting. nearest streets; and the locations of driveways on the subject property and A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 across the street. weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either The Proposed Uses. Tuesday or Thursday mornings. Pre-application conferences are one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of 0 Topographic Information. Include 9:00-11:00 AM. p(Contour Lines if Possible. M] If the Pre-Application Conference is for a PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN ' \ MONOPOLE project, the applicant must PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM attach a copy of the letter and proof in 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. the form of an affidavit of mailing, that the collocation protocol was completed IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE (see Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE Community Development Code). INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM © Filing Fee $240.00 ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE GROUP. Receipt #: 27200100000000003133 __../~_.. Date: 07/31/2001 T I D E M A R K COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC, Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due PRE2001-00055 [LANDUS]PreApp Conf 100-0000-438000 $240.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No °Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Check CHARLES H.MARTIN TTEE 0 813 0 $240.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $240.00 • • OW? Pre-Apps (CD Meetings) August 2001 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Thursday, August 16, 2001 8:00 8:30 9:00 Pre-app 9:30 0 *add 10:00 Pre-App Chuck Martin 503-236-3895 I 11370 SW Fonner, MLP 10:30 1-it(A • • 11:00 Pre-app 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 2:22PM Tuesday, July 31, 2001 • • Hampton PT, L.L.C. Profit Sharing Plan Charles H. Martin, Co-Trustee 944 SE Sellwood Blvd. Portland, OR 97202 (503) 236-3895 July 31,2001 Planning and Engineering City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 To Whom It May Concern: We are now the owners of the property at 11370 SW Fonner in Tigard. This also described as tax lot 2S103AC-02101. We propose to partition this lot into two lots. It is our understanding that this will create a flag lot on which a residence may be constructed. Plans are attached. We do need to know two things at the pre-application conference. When the adjacent lot to the east was partitioned and 4D,s constructed a house on the flag lot in 1997, no sidewalk was required to be built (as there was no sidewalk on that side of Fonner), and the property was allowed to continue to drain naturally. We are anticipating that we would be treated similarly. We are aware that the house will have to be connected to the sewer system as a condition of partition, and that a sewer connection will have to be installed for the new lot created. We appreciate your timely consideration of this application. Charles H. Martin Co-Trustee - 1,' * • . . . . • . • r I I 1 _ I 1 1 • I • I I TL 6300 1 TL 1200 I IL 5100 4 wl , I INDEX OF DRAWINGS I I I ' I . 2 a<1 _1 I GpRRAE Lw I::NGA RTyi T FL L.':A T I I • a. I P AGE N 0. I 1 •'I%..." - 1 I .......0 e I I I - -C.•• ... .."'";' 1._ ___ ___ _ ___ ___ , .1_ ___ ___ __- --- --- --- 1 , I of 3 2 of 3 PRELIMINARY UTILITY & GRADING I I -C I i PLAN I :,`: ' I c.r/ 3 of 3 ON-SITE ANALYSIS & FUTURE I IL 5000 - I STREET PLAN I I _ .e.,, I I %... ,.r my I 1 .4.. '7 I ' I 1 I 1 I I - I g 1 I I I I . 1 * 5 I I / I (1)-- _ __ -. - - -- - -- -- I • .,=. L_ _J --- ST . F S.W. 1 FONNER ; - ------- -4-1-- - ---- 11--- L ,687'4600Ni 1 80.10. z 0 i= c u ,f, — — — _ -- 1-- - -. — —. — ---- ---- ---- — -— --- .-''.•::::::-::::.:*..*!.C..=;. -;.:*4c-,■iici,:::,:::::. L 1 4: .... ,.... t ... .....JT__...F:,__7,;;. , "_____. _r_ _ _ _ 0 IL 2300 TL 2200 1 TL 6100 m 0 0 '....-T-.-...."' TL 2000 7.515.12 sq.f t. VI ■- •-•• • IS < 1-_, VISUAL CLEARANCE I 113 sr, a_ AREA(NC PENCE/WALL) 5. ) .-." I--'— Z.N3STING NONJSE A, N. i TO c■AAIN !".05:::.41-- '8.52 ..... AC . . -.1 '_ SCREENING&BUFFERING: . CL ' wiAn.wwl 5'hoaf FENCE/ I.- wALL ALONG 110 IN 40ES Cr C'CL-E PCEI Ao7E.14SPZ 0 2 vioNn-y MAP SCALE: N.T.S. ...0 Re MAIN rAINEO. ii" o - M 0 n . 7-' .5n::■ f/1 ...: SI I DATA i - _ _ _ _. _ _ J .:: 2 TL 6200 I ; I NET 8-12.-A 7:..,et_ 27 . 7.31. ... GROSS 9..7.-2, ,,,,„. APPUCAN T: TT . ' ..... a . 2. . IL 400 I -..- 3 . . . _ 2 • FI I THOMAS L SHER P.O. 809 11370 1 PORTLAND, OREGON 97211 t VS ONG .., .0-': TO I •TROPOSAL: 2-LOT PARTITION r—ir 0€ ,NovEa I. _j J 1 C.nsTINC ZONING. R-A.5. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ,910:Ps cROf.:17,pAnP:Y: F°,Ei 02:IRREVES Y B Y L.0.C. 1! :::...0 "1 1-......::1- FCRESCTUIGNP -- ---- -- e -- — — -- -- ---. ---- 1.--.-- -- ,--. -- -- ---- — NB T46'00-E 80.10e-6- • I . TAII LOT 2101. 105 NAP 25 1 3AC I LEGAL STORN: CI IV OF 90080. OREGON SANITARY SORER:' 0 TN OF TIGARD CONSUL RNG OTON=•S L.NO USE ALANv£,S LA NO SORvE rOAS . I ria__ PARCELS 1 &6r. 2 MEET ROTOR: OFF OF 110080 slLSISC.C.SMC.Os S 7,17 - - ---. - - - _i eAsic soLAR ACCESS GRAPHIC SCALE ELEc TRIC: P.O.E. Sta-‘081 Is.,..3 41-71. Gust:.....es.-,.,..., . • REQUIREMENTS. " ? 7 1° 'r -ELEPHONE: C.i.f. SO St 2297 TL :600 TU.LATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE 7.-....A. ( IN FER) 1 Inch . 30 71 1 _...._ 11.17 PAPER SZE.SCALE: 'N 1•A60' ' w.3 ./ .. • • ■ • } - t • , I 1 I 1I \ TL 6300 TL 1200 I TL 5100 I I -,.,' " � LEGEND I ?„'?� 4 K I fl EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN v — — — < I- _+.- i EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE TO REMAIN 4 i r " ` I _ G EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED I TL 5000 •<�. ----"92-....--- EXISTING 5' CONTOUR a 1—�1 -•••"P...-••••• EXISTING 1• CONTOUR Ex15flNG EX75 TING r "."'..1 .e. = • MONO EROS TING �i • EDGE OF ROW UNE uNLeox CURB � ! I PROPOSED 5• CONTOUR PAVEMENT BEONS I (T1P.) ; 8 3 (T1'p•) COSTING ® PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR €eB — — — — EasnNC ^\f S8T46 _ BE RELOCATED CAE TO I c_b WATER METER BE RELOCATEDy -e 1 TO BE — — —80.10_ — — I� — p REMOVED I TREE ABREV1AT1ONS ?l, . 4.a; L — -- r - - i3O_ • ' _ Y AP = APPLE J I ----f, ST_ _ >: - - -Q- -= -_.1Qo_ FONNER''_�=: — . . — ._n — =¢ — SI = BIR H S.W. .45' — r-u— . . — . 7414 .x-ss , - - CH = CHERRY O Fl FIR F= V o°. ___ ...r �i�" _ - - 2'°� HO - HOLLY H p o _ . __ _2_•wva 2:ura __ 1, '�.IOI a <-r.rtA=_ — — OA = OAK O_ 6 •..rtnOO :ria _ tp. =/ wr I.r-� I PI PINE Q N is utEA 2. —<Jw< <.,irol -t-� 99< _1. = _ •_'�^— _- 1 -? F`ce1� � ' _ dEOO - SP = SPRUCE [L o Cm umI 10,0.'1 7.• •n�-f r 141--`-'OA-5 INSTALL EXISDNO WI WILLOW ce J a 4 ilfr 701 TAPE FLAW O O O INS MU' - o TAPER uNE Fl-24 = 24° CALIPER FIR TL 2300 TL 2200 PAVEMENT I� ® , (TIN.) TL 2000 (MEASURED 4 FEET ABOVE GROUND LEVEL) rn p- TAPER - ' ^..^ O RE_NOW EXISTING Q EXISTING a ?' 12 CULVERT V WATER .INSTALL SANITARY I Y t1 HTDRANT SERER STUB e - l 20'WOE 0 1 18.52- HALF-STREET c INSTALL DOUBLE 25 5.9)9'1 '7?.... IMPROVEMENT WATER METER T Q J EXISTING T TO NEC R.O.W. DEDICATION . ,�^_ MOUSE TL 6100 R R EXISTING m'.I.• TO REMAIN: 2•EDGE OF `'.. I '' -_ •, - 0 0 GRAVEL I. I8'S? 1� W EXiS^vG HALF-STREET PROPOSED HALT-STREET _ W Z DRIVEWAY 10• _.,J '• I 0. EXISTING WPROVEMENT Q 6:05".'1-- r • h IC L' I < s Y:wGN VARIES >- N �'. <� N STONE WALL I .....-1 I li N --f�, -T- - - N ti aRIES �. •<o 105^ - va iES • W i O 1--e P.V.E�VANES VARIES....) 20' I 10• 8 P.D.E.-I W a d O -EXISnNO� 3;,,,c3 " Z'/,4 1 VARIES 5' •I o.a•(rvn) FlNISN GRADE 5' A 5• I Jai' d~• PI ASS CLONES 41 W 44. MK.V.1 (NUNIKxr fUV ur Lukti O s t1NE5 0.TZ o�00 5 j N4x i �) -¢ELEV. I 5:1 V" 1 • 7 cOi2 2 =:1 VA''''' 2.59% 2.592 2'• 1 i J'* _ J NAx • 1� lbL� �. EXOSTING ~4'f 4'1n0 • . CHNNUNK _ o EXISTING SIDEWALK 1-' -I J'ASPNA0 PAKyENT(2 WITS) (ryp) TOp-' - ', 1 TL 6200 I (NUN90LT CREEK ESTATES)TA(ES) 2•i_0 IEKLVG COURSE SIDEWALK Z. _J I 10-IV-0 BAR ROCK CURB ANO GUTTER STD.-DWG. STREET SECTION (TYP-) e TL 2400 2 I RITZ co SCALE . 1 S.W. FONNER STREET 1 '0�-24 I HALF-STREET IMPROVEMENT " CESINO m c I �m 10 ,'Ft-24 r V REMOVED 8 L_ •- . — C:.OROUP C --.‘I CONSUL LINO LNGN[EfRS LANG USE PLANNERS LANG SUR••fYOQS V Sg - y i4 N8T0.10' E wscs,.7.Is1. 80.10' _ .aamwa OKS061 VIII .c , 4� 648-4061 G -74 -4s.-n•4 — — — — — — J GRAPHIC SCALE EE'.x:L"'anT M"°R'-°"' " 120 a 2297 N. i TL 2600 2 inch a�r) 1 ' ch = 90 Et 11.17 PAPER SIZE.SCALE: I•-60• • • • N ■ TL 1100 I 4, - TL 1200 4 I 3 I TL 1300 \ I;f,� I I I I LEGEND �,�. n 6300 � I � I A ' TL 5100 I D� _ 1 _ ' 45• SOIL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER I _CI". t's'Q 2 5 . "-"`"' SOIL SEPERATION UNE f I •M1 —,'$,� t ^'•'122- EXISTING 5' CONTOUR *, 1 IL 5000 4Vy�. I I ?", ��``''��� -•'9_4. EXISTING 1' CONTOUR 1 g y€ Cmuc Mtn. um*.E cos.. I 3 5§win 3 �nitr.r °CONS I 1'�� �T� ,N� JI N DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION ,�,� gi:10- 80.10 ��. I - FONNER --=i_ Z O c S.W. i _ �_ _ _ +^ ,a.8w,,, R. _ u °o. ` z 1 r7;— �' _°.lid' '�.}^x._ti;. ��°�' w ° ^ S I•�.� :`..„':..t-_-- ,---yam °� aQ N Ill IL 2300 TL 2200. r. 1 \ „",'r"`. ,o... ._i I 1 TL 2000 CC x i . I I, - Et�ourm 0 O u w ii I .."'�mo i" .L, a 0. 1 a s .l ,ro.r�g.- 3 I TL 6100 ,r• ._• --.--I ;" ' lit.W. i-,.,„ t .'/ ray I r. ` ' \tg'_ I.9. N Q• I $ e .._j a® u) a r CIA .-g I —'�a i_� I g- -. — — — I-<IA DESME R F•1 oa• TL 6200 I 45V j/ Wm 1 4O I 2 I 7 I -I .`® I TL 2400 I - I _ 0 $ I o fr -7.- - E r 1 NOTE- I 1 GRAPHIC SCALE i• OFF-SITE CONTOURS EXTRAPOLATE° FROM INCTI6'09'E • U.S.G.S. I 8410 1O I I ; m r g� IN FEET 3 ........4: ";,..•%4-fi •I I mon a a0 1 n_ • I TL 2600 ''f ~^~.y I ' 11.17 PAPER 92E.SCALE: I'�EO' .F':':'- It%F" 8 y ` LDC'CROUP fry. ,;:. r I r LA.0 USE P IAro+ERS 1..0 SURKO.S SOIL LIMITING DEPTH TO SEASONAL/APPARENT DEPTH TO DEPTH TO ,,,:t,,,,�„,,. ' DESCRIPTION % SLOPE ^LLB MEG.lam '''j TYPE FEATURES WATER TABLE BEDROCK FRAGIPAN CAL.) Er r 2-3 ft. PERCHED >60 in. NONE LISTED ����"" '' 45A 45A W0006URN SILT LOAM 0-3% WATER a � 2297 458 WCODBURN SILT LOAM 3-79: EROSION 2-3 ft. PERCHED >60 in. NONE LISTED 45D W0006URN SILT LOAM 12-207. EROSION 2-3 ft. PERCHED >60 in. NONE LISTED 3 N I SOURCE: SOIL C:PISERVATION SERVICE SOIL SURVEY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, JULY, 1982. N. J '3 • • • • • 3 • ( Dgn C Gro P Inc. November 13,2001 PLANNERS APPLICANT'S STATEMENT ENGINEERS APPLICANT'S SURVEYORS REPRESENTATIVE: LDC Design Group APPLICANT/OWNER: Hampton PT Profit Sharing Trust Charles H. Martin, Co-Trustee 944 SE Sellwood Boulevard HILLSBORO, OR Portland, OR 97202 (CORPORATE OFFICE) TOLL FREE:877.648.4061 www.ldcdesign.com REQUEST: Two (2) Lot Minor Land Partition 3300 NW 211TH TERRACE HILLSBORO,OR 97124 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tax Lot 2101, Map 2S 1-3AC PHONE: 503.858.4242 City of Tigard, Oregon FAX: 503.645.5500 BELLEVUE, WA SIZE: 0.42 Acres PHONE:425.468.0245 • FAX:425.462.1374 LOCATION: 11370 SW Former Street • VANCOUVER, WA PHONE:360.573.0370 ZONE: R-4.5 Single Family Residential FAX:360.573.0390 I. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AFFILIATED COMPANIES KLEIN CONSULTING A. City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan. ENGINEERS, INb HILLSBORO,OR B. The Following Chapters of the City of Tigard Community Development PHONE: 503.858.4242 FAx:503.645.5500 Code, Title 18: CTS ENGINEERS, INC. Chapter 18.390 Decision Making Procedures (A WBE/DBE FIRM) www.ctsengineers.com Chapter 18.420 Land Partitions Chapter 18.510 Residential Zoning Districts BELLEVUE,WA Chapter 18.705 Access, Egress and Circulation PHONE:425.455.7622 FAX:425.462.1374 Chapter 1 8.715 Density Computations Chapter 18.730 Exceptions to Development Standards HILLSBORO,OR Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening PHONE: 503.690.8080 FAX:503.645.5500 Chapter 18.765 Off Street Parking & Loading Requirements Chapter 18.790 Tree Removal MECKEL ENGINEERING Chapter 18.795 Visual Clearance Areas &SURVEYING, INC. Chapter 18.810 Street& Utility Improvement Standards www.meckel.com III COEUR D'ALENE, ID PHONE:208.667.4638 FAx:208.664.3347 P:\Projects\2297\DOCS\Reports\M inorPart i t ion.doc Page 1of13 • • • IL INTRODUCTION The subject property is a generally rectangular shaped parcel approximately 0.42 acres in size and fronts on the south side of SW Fonner Street, approximately 120 feet west of SW 113th Place. The subject property was annexed into the City limits of Tigard on February 24, 1998 under Ordinance No. 98-04 (See Exhibit 4). An existing single-family dwelling with an attached garage and a detached shed are located on the property. The existing residence is addressed as 11370 SW Former Street. The subject property has a generally flat topography, with a 4% slope to the north and northeast. A variety of trees are scattered throughout the site, predominantly along the south property line. The subject property does not include any sensitive land areas. The applicant is requesting approval of a two(2)-Lot minor land partition. The subject property is located in the Low-Density Residential District (R-4.5). Parcel 1 is proposed to be 7,508.81 square feet in size and retain the existing dwelling and attached garage. Parcel 1 will have 65 feet of frontage on SW Former Street. Parcel 2 is a proposed flag lot with a 15-foot wide pole/access strip to SW Former Street. Parcel 2 will be 8,023.25 square feet in size and is intended for the use of a future single-family residence. The detached shed on Parcel 2 will be removed. Plans depicting the existing site conditions and the proposed development are attached to this report(See Exhibit 1). III. FINDINGS • A. CITY OF TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: COMMENT: • The subject property is designated Low Density on the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan and zoned R- 4.5 on the City of Tigard Zoning Map. Except where required by the Community Development Code, this application is not required to address goals and policies related to the development of land, since the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan is implemented by the Code. The applicable chapters of the Community Development Code are addressed in the following sections of this report. - • B. CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE,TITLE 18: CHAPTER 18.390: PROCEDURES FOR DECISION MAKING: QUASI-JUDICIAL 18.390.40 Type II Procedure A. Preapplication conference. A preapplication conference is required for Type II actions. Preapplication conference requirements and procedures are set forth in section 18.390.080C. COMMENT: A Pre-Application Conference was held on August 14, 2001 for the proposed partition. A copy of the • Pre-Application Conference Notes is attached to this application. P:\Proj ects\2297\DOCS\Reports\MinorPartition.doc Page 2of13 • • B. Application requirements. 1. Application Forms. Type II applications shall be made on forms provided by the Director as provided by Section 18.390.080 El; 2. Submittal Information. The application shall: a. Include the information requested on the application form; b. Address the relevant criteria in sufficient detail for review and action; c: Be accompanied by the required fee; d. Include two sets of pre-stamped and pre-addressed envelopes for all property owners of record as specified in Section 18.390.040C. The records of the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation are the official records for determining ownership. The applicant shall demonstrate that the most current assessment records have been used to produce the notice list; e. Include an impact study. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements • necessary to meet City standards and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected, private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirements, or provide evidence,which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. COMMENT: These application materials include the following items. A form signed by the property owner is attached to these application materials. A copy of the Trust Deed for the property is attached to this report as Exhibit 2. A copy of the Warranty Deed for the property is attached to this report as Exhibit 3. Full-size site plans are attached to these application materials. Reduced(8 %" x 11") and (11" x 17")site plans are attached as Exhibit 1. A check for the appropriate filing fee is attached to these application materials. These items are provided as requested on the City's application form. This report serves as the"Applicant's Statement"and addresses the appropriate criteria in sufficient detail to allow for review and action. A list of the names and addresses of all persons who are surrounding property owners of record within 250 feet of the site is attached to this report(Exhibit 5). This ownership list is-compiled from the records of the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation. An. "Impact Study," as required by the Pre-Application Conference Notes, is provided in the comments addressing Chapter 18.810 (Street & Utility Improvements). • P:\Projects L397\DOCS\Reports\MinorPartit ion.doc Page 3 of 13 o • • CHAPTER 18.420: LAND PARTITIONS 18.420.050 Approval Criteria A. Approval criteria. A request to partition land shall meet all of the following criteria: 1. The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; COMMENT: The proposed partition complies with all statutory and. ordinance requirements and regulations, as • evidenced by the following findings within this report and the attached plans(See Exhibit 1). 2. There are adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal; COMMENT: Adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposed partition as evidenced by the findings addressing Section 18.810 (Street And Utility Improvements Standards), below, and the attached plans (See Exhibit 1). 3. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards; and • COMMENT: The attached plans illustrate that all proposed improvements will meet applicable City and agency. standards. 4. All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below: a. The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. COMMENT: The minimum lot width in the R-4.5 zone is 50 feet. As demonstrated by the attached plans, the minimum width of the building envelope area for both parcels complies with the lot width requirement of the R-4.5 zone listed in Table 18.510.2. b. The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot,the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation. COMMENT: As discussed within the following sections of this report, and illustrated on the attached plans,the subject parcels comply with the R-4.5 lot area requirement (See Exhibit 1). The accessway of the proposed flag lot is not included in the lot area calculation. 111 P:\Projects\2297\DOCS\Reports\MinorPartition.doc Page 4 of 13 • • • c. Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15-foot wide access easement. COMMENT: As demonstrated by the attached plans (Exhibit 1), both of the proposed parcels have at least 15 feet of frontage on a public right-of-way(SW Former Street). d. Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. COMMENT: • • As discussed under the subsequent Section 18.510.050, Development Standards, and illustrated on the attached plans, the subject parcels contain adequate area to comply with the R-4.5 setback requirements. e. When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. COMMENT: The attached plans demonstrate that sufficient area exists to maintain a minimum 10-foot side yard setback on Parcel 2. 111 f. A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.050. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. COMMENT: According to the attached Pre-Application Notes, sight-obscuring screening is required along the pole flag of the flag lot (Parcel 2). Sight-obscuring screening will be established along the pole of Parcel 2 as depicted in the attached plans and in compliance with the applicable standards of Chapter 18.745. g. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities. COMMENT: A fire hydrant will be installed on the accessway of Parcel 2 if required by Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue. h. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. • P:1Proj e c t s\2 2 9 71D OC SU2 e p o rt s1M i n o rp a rt i t i o n.d o c Page 5 of 13 • • • COMMENT: According to the Pre-Application Notes, a minimum 15-foot shared access driveway is required for both parcels. A proposed 16-foot minimum shared access driveway is depicted on the attached plans and in compliance with the applicable standards of Chapter 18.705 (See Exhibit 1). 5. Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress, and Circulation. COMMENT: • The standards of Chapter 18.705 (Access, Egress, and Circulation) are addressed within this report, • below. This report and the attached plans demonstrate compliance with the applicable .standards of Chapter 18.705. 6. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred-year floodplain,the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. • COMMENT: The subject property is not located within or adjacent to the one-hundred-year floodplain. Therefore, this • section does not apply. • . 7. An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in • accordance with Chapter 18.370, Variances and 'Adjustments. The applications for the partition and variance(s)/adjustment(s) will be processed concurrently. COMMENT: The applicant is not applying for a variance. Therefore, this section does not apply. • CHAPTER 18.510: RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS 18.510.020 List of Zoning Districts D. R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. COMMENT: The applicant is requesting approval of a partition in the City of Tigard R-4.5 zone. The proposed development is a 2-Lot minor land partition. The existing detached single-family dwelling will be • P:\Projects12297\DOCS\Reports\M inorPartition.doc Page 6 of 13 • • • retained on Parcel 1. Parcel 2 will be developed with a detached single-family residential unit in the future. 18.51030 Development Standards A. Compliance required. All development must comply with: 1. All of the applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district, except where the applicant has obtained variances or adjustments in accordance with Chapters 18.370; 2. All other applicable standards and requirements contained in this title. B. Development Standards. Development standards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2. TABLE 18.510.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES STANDARD R-1 R-2 R-3.5 R-4.5 R-7 Minimum Lot Size -Detached unit 30,000 sq.ft. 20,000 sq.ft. 10,000 sq.ft. 7,500 sq.ft. 5,000 sq. ft. -Duplexes 10,000 sq.ft. 10,000 sq.ft. -Attached unit[I] 5.000 sq.ft. Average Minimum Lot Width -Detached unit lots 100 ft. 100 ft. 65 tt. 50 ft. 50 ft. 4110 -Duplex lots 90 ft. 90 ft. 50 ft.Attached unit lots 40 ft. -Maximum Lot Coverage - - - - 80%[2] • Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 30 ft. 30 It. 20 ft. 20 ft. 15 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 15 ft. 10 ti. -Side yard 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 11. 5 it. 5 ft. -Rear yard 25 ft. 25 It. 15 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district 30 II. -Distance between property line and front of garage 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. Maximum Height 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 R. 30 it. 35 ft. Minimum Landscape Requirement - - - - 20% [I]Single-family attached residential units permitted at one dwelling per lot with no more that five attached units in one grouping. [2]Lot coverage includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. COMMENT: As noted previously, the proposed development is a 2-Lot minor land partition. The proposed partition is depicted in the attached plans (See Exhibit 1). Parcel 1 is proposed to be approximately 7,508.81 square feet in size and will retain the existing dwelling and attached garage in compliance with the R-4.5 setback requirements. Parcel 2 is a.proposed flag lot intended for future single-family. residential uses and is proposed to be approximately 8,023.25 square feet in size. The proposed parcels comply with all dimensional requirements of the R-4.5 zone. • P:U'rojects122971DOCS\Reports\MinorPart i tion.doc Page 7 of 13 • • • CHAPTER 18.705: ACCESS, EGRESS AND CIRCULATION COMMENT: A site plan, which depicts circulation within the proposed development and in relation to abutting properties, is included in the attached plans in accordance with Section 18.705.030. The subject property abuts SW Former Street to the north. SW Fonner Street is designated as a Minor Collector on the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map. The applicant is proposing to partition the subject property into two (2) parcels. Both parcels will front of SW Former Street. Parcel 1, which will retain the existing single-family dwelling, will have 65 feet of • frontage on Former Street. Parcel 2, which will be developed with a single-family dwelling is a flag lot • with a 15-foot wide strip fronting on Former Street. Adequate clear vision areas will be maintained for the proposed 16-foot shared driveway for both parcels. An additional 10 feet of right-of-way will be dedicated along the site's frontage on Former Street. A half-street improvement along the site's frontage on Former Street will not be established at this time. The applicant will sign a non-remonstrance agreement to not remonstrate against formation of a local improvement district of improvements deemed necessary by the City of Tigard. CHAPTER 18.715: DENSITY COMPUTATIONS COMMENT: • • The net acreage (site area 18,295.2 square feet — public rights-of-way 801 square feel — flag pole area 1,820.38 square feet— Parcel I with existing house to remain 7,508.81 square fret) = 8,165 square feet. The minimum number of units allowable on Parcel 2 is 1 dwelling unit (8,165 square feet/ 7,500 square foot minimum lot size requirement)= I dwelling unit. CHAPTER 18.730 EXCEPTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 18.730.020 Exceptions to Building Height Limitations C. Building heights and flag lots. • 1. Limitations on the placement of residential structures on flag lots apply when any of the following exist: 2. A flag lot is created after April 15, 1985 by an approved partition; or 2. The maximum height for an attached or detached single-family,duplex,attached, or multiple-family residential structure on a flag lot or a lot having sole access from an accessway, private drive, or easement is 1-1/2 stories or 25 feet, which ever is less, except that the maximum height may be 2-1/2 stories or 35 feet, which ever is less, provided: a. The proposed dwelling otherwise complies with the applicable dimensional • requirements of the zoning district; P:1Projects122971DOCS\Reports\M i norPart ition.doc Page 8 of 13 • • • b. A 10-foot side yard will be preserved; c. A residential structure on any abutting lot either is located 50 feet or more from the nearest point of the subject dwelling, or the residential structures exceeds 1-1/2 stories or 25 feet in height on any abutting lot; and d. Windows 15 feet or more above grade shall not face dwelling unit windows or patios on any abutting lot unless the proposal includes an agreement to plant trees capable of mitigating direct views, or that such trees exist and will be preserved. COMMENT: The applicant is proposing the creation of a flag lot through a minor land partition, as depicted on the attached plans. The proposed flag lot will be developed with a detached single-family residence. Plans for the proposed residence on Parcel 2 are unknown at the present time. However, the proposed residence will comply with the applicable standards of Section 18.730.020 (2). 18.730.040 Additional Setback Requirements E. Lot Area for Flag Lots 411 A. The lot area for a flag lot shall comply with the lot area requirements of the applicable zoning district. B. The lot area shall be provided entirely within the building site area exclusive of any access way. COMMENT: The attached plans (Exhibit 1) demonstrate that the proposed flag lot (Parcel 2) complies with the R-4.5 lot area requirement. The lot area of Parcel 2 is provided entirely within the building site area exclusive of any access way. • F. Front Yard Determination. The owner or developer of a flag lot may determine the location of the front yard, provided no side yard setback area is less than 10 feet and provided the requirements of Section 18.98.030, Building Heights and Flag Lots,are satisfied. COMMENT: The attached plans (Exhibit 1) demonstrate that sufficient area exists to maintain a minimum 10-foot side yard setback on Parcel 2. 111111 P:\Projects\2297\DOCS\Reports\M inorPartition.doc Page 9 of 13 • . • CHAPTER 18.745 LANDSCAPING & SCREENING 18.745.040 Street Trees COMMENT: As indicated on the attached plans, Parcel 1 will have 65 feet of frontage on Former Street. Parcel 2 is a flag lot with a 15-foot wide access strip fronting on Former Street. A proposed 16-foot shared access driveway is located near the western portion of the subject property. As illustrated on the attached plans, a 32-inch white oak tree exists along the frontage of Parcel 1. Due to the required minimum 15-foot access driveway, the 32-inch oak tree should adequately satisfy the street tree requirement. 18.745.050 Buffering and Screening . B. Buffering and screening requirements 5. Where screening is required the following standards shall apply in addition to those required for buffering: a. A hedge of narrow or broadleaf evergreen shrubs shall be planted which will form a our foot continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two years of planting,or; b. An earthen berm planted with evergreen plant materials shall be provided which will form a continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two years. The unplanted portion of the berm shall be planted in • lawn, or other living ground cover; or c. • A fence or wall of the height specified in Table.18.745.2 shall be constructed to provide a continuous sight obscuring screen. 8. Fences and walls a. Fences and wall shall be constructed of any materials commonly used in the construction of fences and wall such as wood, stone, rock or brick, or otherwise acceptable by the Director; b. Such fence or wall construction shall be in compliance with other City regulations; -c. Walls shall be a minimum of six inches thick; and • d. Chain link fences with slats shall qualify for screening. However, chain link fences without slats shall required the planting of a continuous evergreen hedge to be considered screening. C. Setbacks for Fences or Walls 1. No fence or wall shall be constructed which exceeds the standards in Section 18.745.040 C2 except when the approval authority, as a condition of approval, allows that a fence or wall be constructed to a height greater than otherwise permitted in order to mitigate against potential adverse effects. 2. Fences or walls: 110 P:\Proj ects\2297\DOCS\Reports\M inorPartition.doc Page 10 of 13 • • • a. May not exceed three feet in height in a required front yard along local streets or eight feet in all other locations and, in all other cases, shall meet vision clearance area requirements in Chapter 18.795; b. Are permitted up to six feet in height in front yards adjacent to any designated arterial, major collector or minor collector street. For any fence over three feet in height in the required front yard area, permission shall be subject to administrative review of the location of the fence or wall. 3. All fences or walls shall meet the vision clearance area requirements in Chapter 18.795; 4. • All fences or walls greater than six feet in height shall be subject to building permit approval. COMMENT: According to the attached Pre-Application Conference Notes (Exhibit 2), sight-obscuring screening is required along the pole of the flag lot(Parcel 2). Sight-obscuring screening will be established along the pole of Parcel 2 as depicted in the attached plans (Exhibit 1) and in compliance with the applicable standards of Section 18.745.050. CHAPTER 18.765: OFF STREET PARKING & LOADING REQUIREMENTS COMMENT: • Ea ch proposed parcel will contain adequate area for the provision of one (1)off-street parking space, as required by Table 18765.2. (See Exhibit 1). CHAPTER 18.790: TREE REMOVAL COMMENT: The proposed development complies with the tree plan requirements. A tree inventory and tree protection plan prepared by a certified arborist is attached as Exhibit 7. CHAPTER 18.795: VISUAL CLEARANCE AREAS 18.795.040 Computations B. Non-arterial streets. 2. Non-arterial streets less than 24 feet in width. At all intersections of two non- • arterial streets, a non-arterial street and a driveway, and a non-arterial street or driveway and railroad where both streets and/or driveways are less than 24 feet in width, a visual clearance area shall be a triangle whose base extends 30 feet along • the street right-of-way line in both directions from the centerline of the accessway at P:\Projects\2297\DOCS\Reports\M inorPartition.doc Page 11 of 13 . . • the front setback line of a single family and two family residence, and 30 feet back from the property line on all other types of uses. COMMENT: The subject property fronts on SW Former Street, which is a non-arterial street. The proposed street and driveway intersections will maintain clear vision areas in accordance with Section 18.795.040 (B). CHAPTER 18.810: STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS 18.810.030 Streets COMMENT: As discussed previously, the subject property abuts SW Former Street to the north. SW Former Street is designated as a Minor Collector on the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map. The applicant is proposing to partition the subject property into two(2)parcels. Both parcels will front on SW Fonner Street. Parcel 1, which will retain the existing single-family dwelling, will have 65 feet of frontage on Fonner Street. Parcel 2, which will be developed with a single-family dwelling, is a flag lot with a 15-foot wide access strip fronting on Fonner Street. Adequate clear vision areas will be maintained for the proposed shared driveway for both parcels. An additional 10 feet of right-of-way will be dedicated along the site's frontage on Fonner Street. A half-street improvement along the site's frontage on Fonner Street will not be established at this time. The applicant will sign a non-remonstrance • agreement to not remonstrate against formation of a local improvement district or improvements deemed necessary by the City of Tigard. • 18.810.040 Blocks - COMMENT: • The proposed development is designed in consideration of the existing development patterns in the surrounding area. Block lengths do not exceed 1,800 feet in length where possible. 18.810.050 Easements COMMENT: Easements are provided as indicated on the attached plans (Exhibit 1). 18.810.060 Lots COMMENT: The attached plans demonstrate that the proposed parcels are designed in conformance with the standards . of Section 18.164.060 (See Exhibit 1). No through lots are proposed. • • P:\Projects\2297\DOCS\Reports\M inorPartit ion.doc Page 12 of 13 • • 410 18.810.070 Sidewalks COMMENT: Sidewalks will be installed within the partition as indicated on the attached plans (Exhibit 1). 18.810.090 Sanitary Sewers COMMENT: Sanitary sewer lines exist within SW Former Street. Both residences will connect with the existing sanitary sewer line. 18.810.100 Storm Drainage COMMENT: Storm drainage will be provided through the existing drainage facilities along SW Former Street and as illustrated on the attached plans (Exhibit 1). 18.810.110 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways COMMENT: • The site is not adjacent to any identified bikeways. Therefore, provisions for bikeways are not required. 18.810.120 Utilities COMMENT: All utilities will be installed underground, as required. The attached development plans (Exhibit 1) indicate the locations of proposed underground utilities and any associated easements. • IV. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION The above findings, in conjunction with the attached plans and exhibits, demonstrate compliance with the applicable requirements of the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan and Development Code. Therefore, this request should be approved. • P:U'rojects\2297\DOCS\Reports\MinorPart ition.doc Page 13 of 13 • • • C F. • • • • LIST OF EXHIBITS 1. Development Plan 2. Trust Deed 3. Warranty Deed 4. Annexation Ordinance No. 98-04 5. Ownerships within 250 Feet 6. Clean Water Services Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment 7. Tree Protection Plan 1111 • • 0 DEVELOPMENT PLANS fib • EXHIBIT NO. C I II TL 60 TL 1200 TL 5100 1 ` • v . I INDEX OF DRAWINGS ®O 2 I a PAGE No, DRAWING TITIF +�� 1 of 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT £ 2 of 3 PRELIMINARY UTILITY&GRADING d 7 PLAN 3 of 3 ON–SITE ANALYSIS&FUTURE L TL 5000 of-44$ 4� I STREET PLAN �tP I 2271 IA, k kg0i I �y 1—T-1 ,Ism. 3 ! I at�., I *4- 9 fi1b1da _ _�— T — Fiat s 9' � � � I /6111„, J la S.W. g —— FONNER _ -— a �t a� �a e it— L sato' --- � ---- y 58I'46'00-W �� � rr�:J. 0. a d re a • La 3 \ \13.0 ( .° 174 �” i.�5`�> Al vr`� ) O ft TL 2300 TL 2200 \''�',b� 9 TL 6100 TL 2000 � '1 ��' g • '� ✓`" 7.S0GB1 roll 1j^'S} s,�0.-n ,/,‘„,71.4,...,,,C, J a MCA(=MANGE LL) —SGV� IS,Y w �1f 744• ,7 ,-y p E. IS,? g IB9r 'Y z trca- tLxz---7 ;5:0,,E0.4.7.5.$0�7 F 9i �'-, REms� q 14 X 8 VICINITY MAP SCALE: N.T.S. Cr!LAC PAM WAAL wmlw r 44 0 7ENa/ CLEARARCE AMA ALL a St IIIJIMMIX k.8 \3, 80.1} s S —�— —{ SITE DATA TL 6200 I 9 _ J 2 NET 4000.79 w2 a g CROSS 2,04323 AOl6 I OIN.Ex/APPI1tN11. 042 TIA247C2 M.A C mom SIZE PLAN g a O4ARU9 N.N.1NiW.0p-TRU91[E 942 LA D.CALCO 0.10. TL 2400 2 I PORTLAND.0.502) ono: I g TELEPNOxO(901)7]B-x90. PRIA09A44 2-LOT MART ON i MONO I 009100 001010: 2-4 S.84401.0 IAIRLY RE901511AL �SUO TO y- BE MAW" 1 Art 042 ACRES - L J - 101005 PM/: MELD SUBLET 0,LO C. F Ns7'16'OO'E 80.70 s''`'7R�l� OE9CAIP1pN1 IAA l0T 7101•MI YAP E 1]AC te4 p AI 1{r 11101..I NAP onp I 91011 I • SAMAR,S[TIEM CITY Or MARI) Planners .0 IONA 1 WAIVN on OP 1104x0 Surveyors NO E.. QECBOC v.0.L ;ajp J PARCELS 1 k 2 MEET GRAPHIC SCALE 1GEN10NL• OIL ,r1- BASIC SOLAR ACCESS REQUIREMENTS, a • • 0 . Iv FIRE: Tl1AUIR1 VALLE,FM a RAMA ,�. � B7E� 2297 -.- -, 'B7a- TL 2600 (01107) 1 1010-90 IL 110.17 PAPER 87L SCALD 1'-0O• - ! 03 i I I TL 6300 • TL 1200 I IL 5100 I w I pv 2 I Vlp I LEGEND • I p�® I n_ I G� I p I ® EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN S �l 1 t ® E)DSTING EVERGREEN TREE TO REMAIN 6 G I TL 5000 G W� I I EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED 4 ng -- - EXISTING 5'CONTOUR R 4� a7q 4' I t I—I� I - EXISTING I'CONTOUR 0 80888 a6�i m ore rt�iw2 CAaem V I §4! ® PROPOSED 5'CONTOUR d ii gR cune PAK4ERT a z I (TT9.) 4 I trek) omen I 58T46'00'W IDin4tt POLE / P I ® PROPOSED I'CONTOUR fit 8¢¢5 TO BE —80.10_ ( "L{¢I�S g PISMO L I —— ———— R[LOKD —— , L- TRPF ABRPV AI N< ` Z C1 a d�Y J 1 -- - - - e5= Y _ AP APPLE I a > _ °rm FONNER• -.n _ ..0._ n ST_ e� ASH .. 1 _ _ S.W;.tm'-L _'' _ 6- CH CHERRY p HO HOLLY 4 w •..mi02.._...= ram- 41 g��... 7ig' al rlum - •.• — OA OAK % �'eR. •_"9'———1P$- MY . - .__•.r�---aR PI PINE N' B SP SPRUCE — 1�..1 '� .•Y`V`f _._� _�•:- lair——— �'� NI BILLOW cc J Er ••TL 2300 TL 2200 `Ib • Fl-24•24 CAI PER FIR O o 9 OOSRVG (") TL 2000 (MEASURED 4 FEET ABOVE GROUND LEVEL) F G WARR a MEW.SANI:AII,, I i5• ' }• I ]'MHFr NYMAN, SEW?srus •i:"�i :'" ' TASY \ a , .41 INSTAL 001.1131Z ..''MT N WW1 lyl;n PM saNC i Ke We RAW.OCPUTIM ..dam 1(0 TL 6100 HOTEL EXISTING DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE TO BE Norm I�"`j 41 ' •• %MY' IMPROVED PER CITY OF TIGARD. mce ar •. G1AW ORIVEMAT Id Z.!:V V- 9 D WSn=C I Z • IG ... ''.14 IRON h STONE MALL • • V.a ao1NU /q "y; S o z U) MCI /�,. '•.......... • TL 6200 I • A J (TMPa ®g I TL 2400 • -lb, 2 I I ®a-sA I 1 �°• � �TMEOio ;'9 I I • ec nc4o•so ':- • 0 Planners I Engineers N87'46'00'E Surveyors I 80)0' 0110 mw 1008.3 NuaPq OR=•no. J GRAPHIC SCALE .... ,a.a. 2297 TL 2600 of nrr . .3s • ' 1107 PAPER BM=ALL 1'.RD .3 • f n 1100• I - n 1200 4 i 3 01_1300 ` 0 TL 6300 LEGEND TL 5100 45D . 043 0-'' 00 2 I ® SOIL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER 'J �4 I 61 �® son.SEPERATION LINE p 0 34 V —4' ——1 6 ••—.1•—_ EXISTING 5'CONTOUR P e,, 11.5000 _ ®„n tip I I J qX �.� ---99---. EXISTING 1'CONTOUR -1 G ti• I Gibe • • 'M+'' a I Pr ow )7 N.+ DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION 1 1141 rc,:r I I 3F 6wn b9 LL— A ac.� -��- -1 ,r:',.., FCNNER _s r S.W.X _. -_ -• y--- "'. F yy . - - m�r> -- lL�t r- 1111 msgh ,,,.•:- �?— a . "_ "— I--'I Rn-Iy4 W J Fr i � TL 2300 n 2200 i I;' T ....,..2,,,•••• '! n 2000 .a- a -, wie I a t3 III ••\ •I .16100 I1-"b I ....• .•.-.._ a. a •. .:O. i I ...1"' •• `e, ,, ------ wm 1—--—�b vil '• - •TL 6200 I 45B I �' Z 2 I I o 2 �n 2400 P h.`! .e I A —_—_— :SOD` O h•--__•. 1 Nng r I GRAPHIC SCALE OFF-SITE CONTOURS EXTRAPOLATED FROM .- U.SO.S. I' C9 se I ••�• r(WRIST)m b Y I— Si" fhb-4o n. n 2600 - I 11.17 PAPER sx.SCAM 1'.70. >:.. • d" > ^ Group SOIL LEGEND �•l �°` • I Engineers SOIL LIMITING DEPTH TO SEASONAL/APPARENT DEPTH TO DEPTH TO amurnyon n TYPE DESCRIPTION R SLOPE FEATURES WATER TABLE BEDROCK FRAGIPAN iunwa VIM mn. P01001.11 0.0 A ,1 45 • 45A WOODBURN SILT LOAM 0-3x WATER 2-3 ft.PERCHED >60 In. NONE LISTED • 458 WOODBURN SILT LOAM 3-7R EROSION 2-3 ft.PERCHED >60 In. NONE USTED G� - 450 WOODBURN SILT LOAM 12-205 EROSION 2-3 fl.PERCHED >60 In. NONE USTED _<6 N I SOURCE SOIL CONSERVATION MINCE SOIL SURVEY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY,JULY,1982 I y3 • 0 • I I TL 6300 TL 1200 TL 5100 �, I c I INDEX OF DRAWINGS Ap 2 10_ a PAGE No. DRAWING TITLE �� 4 I 1 of 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT c — � 2 of 3 PRELIMINARY UTILITY & GRADING e I- — — — — I PLAN �� I M 3 of 3 ON-SITE ANALYSIS & FUTURE g TL 5000 I STREET PLAN 6 W C N� \ 1 ��AP r t0.]' I Las V co 0,<7 Y. co 0[V I SW usm:ai ` i 10'00 ,,-„,,. : '• ;” _v----i a S'A' lo —p L e< 4*: (. PPA :i°a .fy y.. E x c�m a r 1 r I__ _ - — — — a-<. psi" Al \ G*� .. ..: 9 '° ?%. J S.W. T FONNER •4 :.* ..L k.1' �4.-NzISG:' F.:, r��D...��:-,rr "'; YY 1 4 L' }� �F3T +w1 C'/�C'�,+ ';L'�W. :tit Ej-„1v,,k'Jt Z j %- • Form'r�<'` 31016-t;),...4,...:,;:,' .SN` y.,•,, r,;i3Fs1 a.1,.;.:r, O C ^ :OI �..,;. � +Orb'i8 "� /e P O n• N.$87'46'00"W 80.10 - - - - - r $� ,, '<'fPl,q l-V'7.,-wry„ - {r,',`r,O:t ¢ (V STJ 'Y.fY '4'•j: <fY•-;r/' Fj`Y d N V L -L,)- I X10'WIDE RO.W.DUCAT!. �-. i (' �,.,; �?�HI(n: 'SL.n.. �.•.y%{'� 'Y`}. o T !!UJ//!1!/!(LL/J%//!! Ea "!?r m F Y, v�N't'" l t.� „, �%t4..}�',,y:.”. may; �w J Ca p 15.02' .I .6 B. � Z` `� dl.� }' Pcy „ r. rf T o • 7'TL 2300 TL 2200 "..v,/ of 1 TL 6100 TL 2000 ',ANT' ;y�~�E'SA GT1'�"7:,;.. 7:' y T ya rs,7 n "`V ✓a 7.508.81 eq.11. , 5.:.5(j'936<a t �. "`tL¢S y�,sff 4+ C{ ! _X g a U VISUAL CLEARANCE 5.99' I I&52' .fi i. '; ES 0/4%. 1 tF y 'ti 6`x'. 1, i AREA(NO FENCE/WAIL) - l ; w'.' •�;' •• t ' 4 I,./ DUSTING ...; :: i • I eI I TL 6300 TL 1200 TL 5100 1 J w lq cc®e 2 i g LEGEND ce N n. +c I . EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN W -� ° <C R i ® EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE TO REMAIN E w " °° G TL 5000 �� I a- I Q EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED N �� 1nr 1 -----1�` _-- EXISTING 5' CONTOUR S� o W W N CI 1 �, r'ij 1 -----p___.._• EXISTING 1' CONTOUR d 3a�N l'' DOSTING EXISTING EXISTING COSTING C ® -) p 2 or~' Q 0 EDGE OF FLOW uNE MAXtBOx CURS I PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR F s s u� PAVEMENT BEGINS (TYP.) I a. 30- Q a (n ) S8T46'OOWW uT1uTr POLE I ® PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR r4 l.. a . . EXISTING _ r WATER METER 8010_ •_ °v=m - - . TO BE _ — I I _ v 'a _ — _ _ _ _ REMOVED 1i — , L IL— TREE ABREVIATONS = °'El". O Q _ A�c�-- la Jr _,-.-- i. AP APPLE Z " ? FONNER' .2=. _ r u 'SS el BIRCH• x-ss x-s2 ^J.W •ss g--- �e T _ •E T a— CH = CHERRY O o- _ — _ _ -a—�— o11/VEWAY -_ __ _----- :- 98_ H = FIR F v a ENTRANCE '� - DMAr j WR 9 2a•WATFA HO = HOLLY CC .-h vo 7[ �S<�'✓�. r•nig.— — — OA = OAK 4 wv'� 100•'-''W- 2:'WIS.- TO ...--w ruTU _er+� --e W-.*ci1 1•. 8D e-r:1rn PI = PINE Q a. N o SP = SPRUCE 2a•WATEA �1----- �_ 2:WATER �„� d WATrA -- _ 100 �.W='°1 s•W_ml_ _ _ InvArl �® T --�•- — — -- WI = WILLOW J n 1. ce X07. ._ �,'• I *OA-1 10/ ROW NG r:.c UNE FI-24 = 24' CALIPER FIR M 1-9 ° TL 2300 TL 2200 I ':::',1-:.-.:1z., ' !o� Emma ( ') TL 2000 (MEASURED 4 FEET ABOVE GROUND LEVEL) Q 1-°• u WATERINSTALL SANITARY' •:t`i'is"`,'1' 1 - 12•CUL 1£R l' 0- WATER SEWER STUB •I<.:. :.".•:;;�+ B HYDRANT ro��:.'� �j 18.32' p INSTALL DOUBLE kill' -:..,A) WATER METER Iw".`'_ = 10'IMDE R.D.W.DEDICATION 703 Irp'•, - EXISTING r to, HOUSE NOTE: EXISTING DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE TO BE �`` . • TO REMAIN, I EXISTING `1-'-,J r ;� TL 6100 00 IMPROVED PER CITY OF TIGARD. EDGE OF I -• -..__ .XaS2' ^ i z GRAVEL ^ :<:<'::: + j DRIVEWAY 104 ` .' "' EXISTING 1 a f 'N.' N!W 1'S HIGH } III/ I . 1 N STONE WALL y(J� DRIVEWAY ku v.•:::. �,I O R W LVPROVEMENis 4 9: ___ __E�G® O Q } - •n W cc J Sn :.. . ��* UNES ES HO 7 ` 0 5 cs ?$'O R V) 7oi . I • EXISTING 4'HIGH CHAINUNK '�`- ''Q!° TL 6200 I J (TrP.) €FENCE 2 I - 6 ,� 2 I 1 TL 2400 ' (� 1 . k - 1-'j+ ' °CH-2A 9 1 . "Fl-38 r'r EXISTING °10 I 2 : a SHED TO 8E REMOVED® I 1` FI-2A f- -19°-•V 0 ?- `�`?'?* �� �'•e Design 1 s '• 'Group lne. Planners Engineers N87'46.00 WE Surveyors 80.10' 3200 KW 21155 TERRACE I 1aLL580RO.M(C°I 97125 POIC:(5(1.1)C16-42.2 r (10T)953_3300 GRAPHIC SCALE i2 0 1s 20 w 00 2297 = m.R o TL 2600 ( IN FEET) 2j 1 inch-. 30 SL (� 11:17 PAPER SIZE.SCALE: 1-•80' 11110 `'3 do I, 1 , I I W ,. i._ I V , g I LEGEND t,,, .d eL ���/\JC�� /��j) I II>< ® EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN TL 5000 (VN lIn I I ® EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE TO REMAIN • vU C D+c9' I EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED a a 1 1BS 59--,--- EXISTING 5' CONTOUR o 0 1 r •--...--�4?.....�••••• EXISTING i' CONTOUR � � r" - C N EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING �� EXISTING I 1' I ® PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR c I o,p EDGE OF FLOW LINE MAILBOX CURB i % I ® a 8 m c",PAVEMENT BEGINS I (TYP.) I1 P PROPOSED I' CONTOUR d 5 c^ (TYP.) EXISTING I ' j .g c o EXISTING I S87'46'00"W UTILITY POLE a I TREE ABREVIATIONS ; v v r WATER METER I 80. Or— — �� I 1 AP . APPLE $ n =1n c TO BE _ — - - - - - - - T A5 m ASH a If g REMOVED (n L_ — — et . BIRCH ° w°t - — •{� 00•........... _ .. - Ise CH . CHERRY E� to a" �i I _ •• c.T-- HO = HOLLY 2 UOsC L � �.... _ �, � , - ------ ' ,9• � '1 — X SS �7 1 . O - O�Y � a 3r .W. ,c 1111 '-....7.09 X_ss — . . = - - .- - WA . WALLOW _ x 55 EXIST.. . _ . --`s? FONNER ,x 1111. _ x SS IN PINE x-1111 . — . — 16' EXIST• _ T- �� RULE Z - — g—_ — _ -- _ - DRIVEWAY - _ Fl 24 - - -ENTRANCE -JTER ' (MEASURED 4 FEET ABOVE GROUND LEVEL) _ . .- • . ........... ,♦ D'WAY_- 's• 4.:W�TT,(i... 24 WATER ).... 6 Mal O ® 98. . 24' CALIPER FIR N co • 100 ..,..,.,.. o. r W1/ 24•WATER ' "6•WATER ts' WATER ^4 2e WATER —24'WATER ., �•Q'• 8 YIAIER r.. • � •99 ME VEL � -' � 6 Q fV - — I r L m �A" 6'WATER 6•wrLRER — — — '� '-41OD L .�J a 6�WATER — — - D1NAY I I 1'•:'...: O r.. 1 •w„,. .OA-3 EXISTING NOTE: EXISTING DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE TO BE 0 p x o • 01•• ` - 101 FLOW IMPROVED PER CITY OF TIGARD. U) o TL 2200 INSTALL CB I ` `1�N DITCH EXISTING (TYP.) TL 2000 a 1 �a EXISTING INSTALL SANITARY 'r.::: :+: '�I 12' CULVERT WATER SEWER STUB `• 1 � '# I 18.52' HYDRANT 14;',.;V: " :.. INSTALL DOUBLEt9§.''.I o •4 10' WIDE R.O.W. DEDICATION WATER METER ,,,r, _. j z 1031.:"i .;`r EXISTING :: HOUSE TL 6100 TO REMAIN ; o z a EXISTING IE'g+a E 1 Cr ce EDGE OF k,� -. 18.52 k 1n Z ce LE GRAVEL DRIVEWAY jp4 W I }' ;o`ll'. I-r ,' N W EXISTING 2 Q a N tD 1't HIGH 1 W O I I I EN STONE WALL 105-'1 A .1 3 m DRIVEWAY W I, v p z ff IMPROVEMENTS O ';"' i" / O X Q I >,:." L EXISTING D;� w y AS�4 CLONES Ho FLOW LINE in dD� ' UNES !? m O SL = 5xt 00-------- ---- 0 {� m �O� ,,I N O i N o ., e I —I dgp o EXISTING k 4' HIGH FENCELINK 0 m ' 1 TL 6200 o• 0 ..•. `j. �CH-24 1A GRAPHIC SCALE 6n �eers FI-36 % EXISTING I �0� m o b m e e II) SHED TO Surveyors r•-- BE REMOVED ��8 v�� Y �' °' "�� "� mono 2"coN 24 FI-24 I.. (DI Pest) p401E003)1150-4242 ------, -- _ _ — I Inch. 20 a FAX 645-5500 C .I4e0WgLearn �: o n U ..-.v V 1107 PAPER SZE•SCALE: 1•r4o' DEC . q roe 2297 `� 14?4 `�s �'`� �/'7,�.p�� p0�{ SHEET NO. I N87'46'00"E CITY `V� TI A D 80.10' 2 . 1 1 3 • • • TL 1100 I _ IL 1200 i 4 i 3 I TL 1300 TL 6300 I I LEGEND P TL 5100 45D - I N,a 45 A SOIL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER . $ 2 U a \� �� I S I 0. — I aI SOIL SEPERATION LINE ii M -•--J0'--- EXISTING V CONTOUR a ri t1 on TL 5000 4'P I :I m co H • --10-s---• EXISTING 1' CONTOUR • , o a n '' Ensnxe Us c vnnxc COMO - a =a O 5i • :°GCw°evr IKONS"1 I YA JU mne I 5 W d i'""•i (*R.1 J ®� DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION p N-e°La • I 58rt6'oo'W I m - - - I ,_ _ _ 80.10 - - - - °e m' - 1 _ I_ - x L`ma1- -�- / -•'e woE xAt' � - -I-- J ®®--- :�z- __s :,, -�_ — ST._ r- — — — I L —- — _ FONNER- --_s -o-- z S.W. R ---— •} V — .— ta., V o cn ai mini 0 CI uf TL 2300 to cn TL 2200 I I 9` _ oiwTY MI i"'.1 I TL 2000 o x s n • I 1y- m..nr c t°- M `° z> a _ 0onae ¢ \gin �,'-1:, day,„ -;'' I TL 6100 I`/�' 9 °_ - I '----d• '- -I------------ - 11 • I 1s------ GM'E11---a. --.l R• `. I coma 1•1m •�- '[� N' 1 S MOI • �• - / V' J 1 I '9r "I I ,,,,_ -2 , N •6 20W • • T� 6200 I 45B in W I ma I z I 2 {— - { , I - 1 - - - - TL 2400 3 0aStx I 0 I ® t.-� wm II _ J s 2 I a l RA NOTE. I GRAPHIC SCALE OFF-SITE CONTOURS EXTRAPOLATED FROM I N8746'00"E - - - - - U.S.G.S. 1 80.10• i w 0 20 w w w ( .. .. t J' f DI FEET) I- I TL 2600 I 1 ' . 11x17 PAPER SIZE,SCALE: 1--90' '•::::::i1::;::.... a Deeiga . W.V.Group • SOIL LEGEND Planners�, _ Engineers SOIL LIMITING DEPTH TO SEASONAL/APPARENT DEPTH TO DEPTH TO Surveyors TYPE DESCRIPTION % SLOPE FEATURES WATER TABLE BEDROCK FRAGIPAN 3300 N.W.211711 TERRACE 1RrtuecAa Data svu• lAfi(•OO�i)10]-15007 �-• 45A, 45A WOODBURN SILT LOAM 0-3% WATER 2-3 ft. PERCHED >60 in. NONE LISTED 0C1e°9"`°" , a 2297 45B ' WOODBURN SILT LOAM 3-7% EROSION 2-3 ft. PERCHED >60 in. NONE LISTED RUM., _ 45D WOODBURN SILT LOAM 12-20% EROSION 2-3 ft. PERCHED >60 in. NONE LISTED „�S y SOURCE: SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE SOIL SURVEY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, JULY. 1982. >3 • ` i • • S TRUST DEED • • s2 EXHIBIT NO. 2- Sent By: HP LaserJet 3100; 5032396133; Nov-2-01 3:01PM; Page 2 u ON No.'1176-TRUSTECI R 'i __ _- . .YFK T w NS•I4E w Pueus,fac Co...PQr,wa.GR 97206• . 1INT .. ; _ _ . cc* •• • . ;:: SPATE OF OREGON enry_ L.. Buex - County of Washington ---- a 250 vX7`���. 4 0 _SW Wes gate Dr ., •Su x t 1, Jerry :IL?. 1 e a, of Assess- t PQ. _.].4,115.:,. 9l?:9j221-242.2 mint and�;K °i-;:fin i,°rtetnty r+t t«.wms.naa •�• Clerk fors , �,.z r��.r;,�,1'7if"-� ecelve t t•�,�p-4�,. Pi;}' �c> P_i1=:f f�Ar nqq 1'l��_ the wit ' 0/:t:-.,,:...-' ;:: J- _,�. e n T. .s�;pf said t - ' ' T%: COUn I a�r,;t 'ti s Sri I• S.ceigitprarty'.Nam.and Address SPACE RESERVEI +t **‘ -;4•T,..,--'�►%I ` . - FOR Jr- . 5�w.. 1a,`w::5 .' Aber nco•dlnp,return to(M�inuf�AOOri.a,YIO): � } //( , !�z_ P�:e.. I J �u e.v -- - RECORDER'S US1 cif' . .i + P'•.• .) '' � � '�' �'' hector of S4'{o fw War g??f�tr_, �1",r 4 _- V� "' axatlon,Ex- p,rf l,,.,I o A. 4• Q—7 z 1 . a 4:.z z. ;�,: ��. lif. • lerk until rpa..t.d otr+.rwu.,Bind sit tur:st.t.m.nt.to(ttwn.,;Addr.r.,np): Doc 20010 2 6008 1.9,9,.-t.C..-Se k-,.(4 Ql�/��i�__�__.--• Rect.: 275385 .f'vv 14r_t.t f!f`g.°!'` tilt 0_'Z,,_ 03/29/2001 10: 12:06ant • TRUSTEE'S DEED ' THIS INDENTURE;Made this'___29_t.h day of March, 2001 -_ ,T9C. .._, between a:;. Minty_ .:_83;;3Er. - -•-., hereinafter called trustee; and::;`_ 1'IBthgt_o71_.PT..;_LI�C..__Prolit__S. axitt�;,.Ra..s'1� .- I' hereinafter called tl(,jS second party;WIThESSETH: i� RECITALS_ _-Ax i.&a-•0JzQUP r .LLC. ,. . . , as grantor, executed and delivered to _.._Q .t3.on t_ B,_..IASi1X.c3 . COIUp .y _- - ,as trustee, for the benefit of _ Hampton IPT,l__1,LCl, Profit Sharing Plan -._-_, as beneficiary, a certain trust deed dated March •' r, 2000 7p9c , recorded March . 8, 200 0.. , _,48,--__-, in the Records of , hingtS2n_ ;_:__- County, Ore n'; in book/reel/volume No. _ at page ...-_- and/or as fee/file/instru- 'nt/microtilm/rece6 tion No.2 0 0 0 0 18 4 0 6 . ., In that trust deed, the real property therein and hereinafter described was conveyed by th`':granror to the trustee to secure,among other things,the performance of certain obligations of the grantor to the beneficiary:The grOtor thereafter defaulted in performance of the obligations secured by the trust deed as stated in the notice of default hereinafter iientioned, and such default still existed at the time of the sale hereinafter described. By reason cif the default, the owner and holder of the obligations secured by the trust deed, being the beneficiary therein named, or the benef tiary'ssuccessor in interest,declared all sums so secured immediately due and owing-A notice:of default con- taining an election tai sell the real proper y and to foreclose the trust deed by:.advertisement and sale to satisfy the asserting grantor's obligations was rec{kted on_NQvelf .ck.. 2_Z,. 2000 , 19e , in the Records of Wash..ns on County, ''' xxxxalttxliltx as fee/file instrument/microfilm/reception No.2.(1110_0.9.4.9_0. iu;tusoldrttrid�a�aod i'l. x rocxxxxatn4saBrxxx table tt d(1 3,to whrch reference now is made. After recording the''notice of default, the undersigned trustee gave notice of the time for and place of sale of the real prop- ;,,;. erty,as fixed by the.trustec and as required by law. Copies of the notice of sale were served pursuant to ORCP 7 U, (2)and 7 D. (3), or mailed by both fist•class:.and certified Mail with return receipt requested,:to the last known addresses of the persons or their legal t.: representatives, if atly.:named in ORS 86.740(1)and 86.740(2xa),at least•120 days before the date the property was sold. A copy of the notice of salt was mailed by first class and certified mail with return:receipt requested to the last known address of the fidu- ciary or personal representative of any'.:person named in ORS 86.740(1),promptly after the trustee received knowledge of the dis- ability, insanity or Oath ofany such person. Copies of the notice of sale were served upon occupants of the property described in the trust deed in the mannctt in which a•.summons is served pursuant to ORCP 7 D. (2)and 7 D.(3)at least 120 days before the date the property was sotd,:purstiant to ORS 86.750(1). if the foreclosure proceedings were stayed and released from the stay, copies of an amended notice i f:sale in the form:;regt)ired by ORS 86.755 (6)were mailed by registered or certified mail to the last known addresses of those OrSons listed in ORS 86.740 and 86.750(1)and to the address provided by each person who was present at the time and place set(stir the sale which WAS stayed within 30 days after the release from the stay.The trustee published a copy of the notice of sale in a itOspaper of generaal.;circulation in each county in which the real property is situated once a week for tour suc- cessive weeks:Thellast publication of the notice occurred more than twenty,days prior to the date of sale.The mailing,service and publication of:the notice of sale are shown by affidavits and/or proofs of service duly recorded prior to the date of sale in the county records,those affidavits and proofs,together with the Notice of Default and Election to Sell and the notice of sale,being now referred • and incorporated;,#n:and Made a part:of this deed as if fully set forth herein.The undersigned trustee has no actual notice of any .rsnn,other than t'epersdns named in those affidavits and proofs as having or claiming a lien on or interest in the real property, entitled to notice pursuant to ORS 86.740(1Xb)or(1)(c). The true ant ctual Co:. nsideration for this conveyance is$.172 r 1 11'q 1' . (Here comply with ORS 93.030.) __ .. I •IL_. _. _..._ (OVER) • Sent�By: HP LaserJet 3100; 5032396133; Nov-2-01 3:02PM• ry Page 3/4 >;i .. : : . ..,.: . g arch: 29 2001 The undersigned stce,op -�. � ,49c__...,at the hour of ......1.11.--.0..0______ o'clock, _A....M., in accord with the standard 41'time established by ORS 187.110,(which was the dey'and hour to which the sale was postponed as per- mitted by ORS 86.755(20(wbi4h was the day and hour set in the amended notice of sale)*and at the place so fixed for salt, in full accordance with the laws of the*ate of Oregon and pursuant to the powers conferred upon the trustee by the trust deed,sold the real property in one parcel aOptiblic suction to the second party for the sum of$17_i ti:g6, the second party being the highest and best bidder at the sa0,and that sum being the highest and best bid for the property. NOW,TH1?REF P.E, in_ onsideratiori of that sum,so paid by the second party in cash, the receipt whereof is acknowledged, and by the authority ve #red in the trustee by the laws of the State of Oregon and by the trust deed, the trustee does hereby convey unto the second party an interest which the•grantor had or had the power to convey at the time of grantor's execution of the trust deed,together with any 'ttereat)he grantor.or grantor's successors in interest acquired after the execution of the trust deed in and to the following described2teal property,to-wit;, : See Exhibit A- • . i • 1 : • • I TO HAVE Apr)TO`;HOLD the:same unto the second party and the'second party's heirs,successors in interest and assigns In construing :this instrument.and Whenever the context so requires,the singular includes the plural; "grantor"includes any successor in interest to the grantor,as well as each and every other person awing an obligation,the performance of which is secured by the trust deed; '?trustee'includes any successor trustee; "beneficiary" includes any successor in interest of the beneficiary first named above;and 3'pccrson"includes a;corporation and any other legal or commercial entity. 1N WITNES WHEREOF,the undersigned trustee has hereunto executed this document.If the undersigned is a corporation, it has caused its naihe to bit signed and Its seal, if any, affixed by an officer or other person duly authorized to do so by order of its ?r; board of directors, . `'-f • THIS INSTRUMENT WIL{N�wNDT AL14W USE OF TttE'PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS ✓' -•-• INSTRUMENT IN.VI0(A DN OF APPLICABLE LANG USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS, _ ___ •�./ GEFQ.E SICGNING•OR AC;GEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE, henry L- lauer TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SMOULO HEC't WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY _ •_ _ _ PLANNING OEPARTMER ' TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DE,ERMINE ANy --- - -'-- LIMITS ON LAWSUITSRGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. - -- -- • v; •D,Iets woe In ptrecoli ae•It Iniyintlkarte. • • 1 • tiny STATE O1`OREGON, County of__ ��t.110, !I&3i__----_--------_-)ss, €• Thts instrument was acknowledged before me on March 2. ,._2 0 01-_• __, pgA ._-, IIII 1 by _Iienxy.. ..__1 .&UE - -- tint4Sitt ar c.._ _,c»__..__, • I r H. STEP HEN SAUE R •+ , ,;, NO-D AY KIRLIC-OREGON Notary Public f• Oregon _ / - _ w; COMMISSION NO.334629 My commission expires _.__S^ / I" O �- 1 MYCOMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 15,2004 -- It. , ;!.t . ;: :- ; 2_ • ____,__, ______ _._____._=....„,.._____________:_______.___,_ , __..._._._ :: , : . . .. ._ __._._. __ ._ .. _ Sent By: HP LaserJet 3100; _..... ..... _... .___..... .... 5032398133; :::•. Nov 2, 3:03PM; Page 4/4 • • ::: • . . . . _ . . . . . 4111 ,.... t..... • ,,.. . . . • . .. . . . . . . • . . ..i.;;... .7. . 1:0 . • : : . :•:. ! • — . i?, • „ . . . ili • '-;.' . . , . • . .: . . - • . il...' • ::: . . : . , ;•1•; • : ' ;.‘? • • . i:t. . . 1%; • ; . . EXHIBIT "A": 1,1': , • i . Legal Description . r::', .• • . : , • ...: : • . . . •.:,.:•4 • . . . . . . gi • . : • , • A tractoof land in Section 3, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridiak . inithe Countiof Washington and State of Oregon, more particularly desCribitd. as .4ollowsi .4:... , . . . Beginniqg at ,a point In the center of County' Road No. 495, which point of beginni#g bears South Q° 53' West along the North and South center line of Sectioip, TOwnship 2', South, Range 1 west of the Willamette Meridian, a 41" distant of 2216 .8 feet and North 87° 46' East 316 .9 feet from the quarter corner on the North line of said Section 3, end which point of beginning bears North 0 .53qEast 402.0 feet and North 87° 46' East 316.9 feet from an iron . . ,., pipe atgChe 'recogniiedcanter of said SectiOn 3; thence from the above • describiad point of beginning South 0° 53' West 247.0 feet; thence South 89° 53' East 1T4.0 feet; thence North 0° 53' East. 254 .1 feet to a point in the center of :saifiCounty Road:go; 495; thence South 87.° 46' West 174.1 feet to the place of be4ning, , , EXCEPTtVaCt described in Book M, Page 82, Miscellaneous Records of Washingcon County$ Oregon. ;. • 7. • 4 . • .: . , . . . p , . •. . • ;•7„.: • . . • kz... . . . . s,•?_. :: : . . . i..,. .. , • . • • • . . . g . • . . • • . • . . . . . . . ?„. . . . ,,,,• : . . . ... . • .• . s • . • . • • 14 ...- • • . . • . . . . . . • . . . . . • . . . . :t s:. • . . • :,. ,.:::: . :. . • ,,,:. • . . . . . . • .7 . . . . .' . • 3 • 14., ,:. .. •. . . • WARRANTY DEED • • EXHIBIT �. tl. • :): :Th•' �^ 7 STATE OF OREGON jxll�k i. I f,T1" ' County of Weehlnyton SS ' jf e, 'hfc4t 4 f OREGON TITLE 44?-004-` Ufa (f jJ. Insurance Company • t,Jerry R.Hanson,Director of Meese- * :.; ment and Taxation - - t t^ yr t o and Ex•Ofilclo County 1+ k BD 9 ;:a;•.•:•••••••''- , Clerk for said county,do hereby certify that : w.3 , -.,.4's:::t r t • the within instrument of writing was received " 04,1:7;.•;,..:i,.,,:-..-,1.,-? ' `,Ko. - �J After rQ Return to: ; and recorded In book of records of said ,T,Mrs ; 44k Y ' county. ,a.rY ti. y. � e 1k J - its al: r • ,GJ Susan Box 11370 "C '�e`. ,YS�f, Wall:: r„ . ; : Portland, CR 97211-1370 'a`tt t '3 w,? 37}, •J a r r y R. Hanson Director of Si :'4-V ' Assessment and Taxation,Ex- ▪ , Until a change is requested, tax stetecnents _ Ofriolo County Clerk 1 7 r . l shall be sent to the following address: ; T rrr 714:, k: 'y'ca . DOC : 97063273 r "..424711` ,1.2 Y 1 H 4,' ,s ,, ,, $ ___ � as above --- Recta 189090 148.00 r " af• ` ..` :i F 07/10/1997 10: 34:23am $t '"` M`" ' ! • k,srJ`i,TMS;f Ls ; hr(' •:Y.�}•.,`%;. v t b'TATIJT�tY FlARRANrSt DEFa ,ey21.•r "�ypam�' • f.'(" 3 Y�'-' "�yr. ' (Individual) • � .+. tr•` . ;; Above Speoe Fleser�red for Reoo�der t s Use S ;.f{ ° '''P%#!,.yak co ;co i i t , ' ass .Y�tery' 1, Howard I. Katcher and Alne I. Hatcher ,t •rte•-0-3V';- ;,+• nL''yl� - v11 P tFJ_4 fi. •�"'`� r CDi1VEtys and warrants to I �r� l`te Thanes L. Fisher X45 4 �-S'y>� � W.. ~!; ;:44 the following described real property in the State of Oregon and County of Washington n s%:_ z11-- . .,k-Act y; free of encumbrances, except as specifically set forth herein: :Arvy .;4t' z>' :=° h r f At t e r :11. i t ,... ATA.LL �Ti' F)tosri t� TAR +# f ,t' ./. ar � S f/0'o p 7• /0 . 9'7 ,- liA , �, j ny},,..,i.„-,..44:..„..., as .Iu me DST[ Ty3 s sx * 4y.• Y,'2f.1 ' Tax Account Nunber(a): R470555 ° 3� 4 � cwt•, 1.,;: This property is free of ena.mbranoea, Ear: , f •a . 1. Taxes for the fiscal year 1997-98, a lien in an amount yet to be determirtd but rot `�fn : •' .1E yet payable. �sr t? .`u. ,,4 :*,4,4:-. ..;.::: .,'.f „ 2. 'I1 subject property lies within the boundaries of the Unified Sewerage Agency and is 3} -44. � a, subject to the levies and assessments thereof. 'r`? '..y C f a ? (Continued) '' Ax i g++ cortveyanoe is 5110, 00 + ie(nil to on Ac�m+vbtrx o3 fnrt ) I ++r The true orneidt3ration for this `'GS` .c F V to ll inn i ".*ter'. :4 ,I i THIS D�11 4?R' WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROP till kSY3i.1� IN '11CIS x26 IN viol- ! � ' 'C ;s`�: N..t,,v,41-,..;...;,._..'.. TION OF APPI.ICASI.E LAND USE LAW AND RECULATIC[•iS• WORE SIGNING OR 11 rn�0 THIS I?r1- f v( 1 f,t`.,.:.. .4 .ii•; " i KENT, -i1 PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY MOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY �f '-;Slit t .i� •YYa .t � COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LD•QT8 Ctl1 LAW- ' t -w 'cL�•G••!.i;�,j { . SUITS AOALNST FARMING CR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINFD IN ORS 30.930. 4.A .s -. `j; +,��i, 1 DATED this 7�- day of July, 1997. #�4ti Y , ',•z•••••••••%,•,;••,••. cc7Cyi9r/ , ({/ x cLC. LC1�4?-.• CL.(.i! '� f}� } I. Ha ALna Hatciitx ,c .-is44I� r•,•. is Yil ♦ 4 it � id JJ L/ N- 7° -tt h t i 6'4 c°Y�.f i •''� �y �+ tirol i.,rime..;: `w3i.S i STATE OF ORDOON, MUJNi'Y OF ..-. 1)138. I"itr 3't� s• *; �; The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this a day f Jul 1997, `�r +�, €; Y Y, by � ;;t •r� 'zre ,; '. :,...•' I••• • I. Hatcher and Alna I. Katcher. ,�,,i•o. v,``' i s1 K•i . • tit -.N �yri,,1/t!p(. .sS�V1� rnrtb,5ya, for e : _..-_. elrq'ul%ie, t : 'i r;' My Comm rn Expires.7/J.1!(,) '•BRADLEY 1": '"•••«-T,c;j,, Mh MOIANr PUBItC ONIIiUN .. .,x,41,:Yi.•-.[a, ,s . ... COMMI8SION NO UOaaab q ►r ''•'`i= Ki . . ,.. ......._ .___ •. ,,...„.,....t.„..........., . .. ..__..........„.„,„__.................................. „.............„,.., .....,_-.,.....„......., ...,..........„..............,....„..44„...._.„L.....„,„ ...,...„.....„... .,.•. 1.1-,. - ... .....,-. , .4.:3Clatr...1bSt.Y. t".''':;'''..'Ft'''. '. . 7* •• .•*-'•;- ‘1, ■'' • 's * .. *- • '-'-'--'=••-1•••-•' ••••••• k • -;';-,--,-.%- .- '-' --, --'::-;•--;,-..,--.----';'-rr:=-,:t.'-.,.;i:".,-':41,'Ilr-l--Fc`4 ts't ..- --,•,•' ..' . ,--.!:,-,:-',"-•:''; so .'*;','..,2-‘1,.-', . PotiT.4.71:••••2.2,'''.7.21:-'37:,•..: +`-',..:••■,,*r . • STATITI WA OETt RRANTY DEED ..,,.1..Ifi e...1.•i•....Ir.', •02 , (011TTNJED) ...,,- . .,0%,,,,,,:ti:. .s':•.:''..:''/•' •- 1 . 1,'. .•- ..,..... ' IEML EESCRIFTION (Oontinuad) Order No.: 260802w ri ,5;z., -1:411111,re • : t-- ...is:..'{4%;r/7?-^..t." .■■".' ,. ... . A tract of land in Secticr: 3, 'Town South,ship 2 Sou , Range 1 W the Willarrette Mer-idian, 1-cr,1111Airly .Q ', *. in the Ccurrty of Washington and State of Oregon, more particularly described v.;;.■.„.&' '..tte. .Z.:".e-ke • • .,.....- ."1 -' -. 2•!':i, ".."'t'''%,'1'..'•••'''`'' • •.' 11-Y:f":: Begiming at a point in the center of County Road No. 495, which point of • beginning bears •,;.444- d-'-• '--- . .,-6, .-.,..y. -,...... r , .1.. .::. South 0 53' West along tte North and South center lire of Section 3, 'Township 2 South, I'.4%; _Tvillimpt :.",.??...; --: Range 1 Wet of the Willamette Meridian, a distance of 2216.8 feet and North 87 46' at -1..;,,-.4,.% ....-. 316.9 feet from the quarter corner cn the North line of said Section 3, and which point Frlas"!. .I7'.7e-ply-' : of beginning bears Nt..1rUi 0' 53' East 462.0 feet and North 87• 46' East 316.9 feet from an ,....0,.t, ...,..% ... ..;.-. i'a•r••:.,2•21,....•, --o,*.• ,;,„....A.,1 ;..1.,:t-t•V•2.•.;1=., 4•‘••;71,t•'•• -•-".•'•i iron pipo at the recognized center of said Section 3; thence fro:: the above described -.. •;•4•1.-4:;=.-'-:' point of beginning South 0' 53' West 247.0 feet; thence South 89 53' East 174.0 feet; -,.,.,....., . . ••,7 i•,',11:•••••••••••••..,•. .. thence North 0' 53' East 254.1 feet to a point in the center of said County Road No. 495; c.-..0.-...,.q-„....„ .,.) 7A7,1-e-)-t..,--,, South 87• 46' West 174.1 feet to the place of beginning, "I ,--;;.-.0 ..-...... .....,•. i'.• .....,4,..,, ,,,, EXCEPT tract describod in Book M, Page 82, Miscellaneous Reoorrls of Washingtm County, 4.",,,I.f.*::....-:;.!_,.11 ... ty• cqfpm,....,,10.1- 5-s=t). .)..,,..,;-.......,-...„. Oreon. %.;:q.,-t. q.117-,..•,verli. ' •'..--,-.7-,. ... , le.7,,..,',-;..-::: .;.--. ..,liti-",).-:....:?.„...st,--•'• , .1".‘,:,-,:,.',,:'..-,•'..:. '',P.i.',...24:14.•3';':.`,1., ta, _"--.V.i.,':‘,:.5:.:.".-•.••:, '5'...-..,,,,..,....-,) Z.:I...-. .1'4:1,':.".-.',-.4 ' . . f A Vi.1...'. • ....•. •,.• TZ•t '-i:.!''`ii4:,-.:51 !,.:f.::-e;.,-,,,..'71...-:-..,:-.•,,. !,-,.;:4.1.2.T,.-.:,..,.'-..':„.' :L.., ..•_.14:2;A:A. ''''Vi.V.....•0.F".-**• •••..,::":f•*•.';••'''''-'`-- 1 , 2i;'.6.-•:•-4... ••e".t•i*",,•••••..;5%.•-.....*''-. 4,0 '211;4.A.,47t*;?.--- 7..V... ..f- :.-.','';;-.'....• k?'i Iciagli . (Continued) Order No.: 260802w • •*,.••:••;•,;•..`"•;''.:.... F.I S.21_,MA*, 3. Tte rights of the public, goverrrnental bodies, and public utilities, in and to that portion of the herein des=cibed property lying within the lirrits of roads and *60,';•iN.tek„iir:).-4%- .4`..•'''''',••,7„ ..:.• .••••■4` ‘.1,4•4?...42,..-V7'. highways. .q.- ,„..„,!-:_:_:_,•_._ -ix ..,,.44.-....- `2 .,t,••••.42CK‘if,". *ri‘t."••■..-*•*,2:•,,2,-' :.- ••*-`•_r.1%.,..;-.22., ■ -..... ...,;.,,,..,.._ ..... ,... ra,,, ...."... ...•k•d.,••+.-42•••i'. -•- • •4•• A--.4'..'<..,-.=e7.1 :;± ?.i;■, :-.:-:- 71, •-`.-- " •.!.... .:1-c9,11-..,,,,,,,g .....-.1.,,..t,t... w...,r„,-.... ,....... 42.:- .:,;.:...,- jii 41 va4lfrit,' 31;4-riZz..--.74'=, ..,,,-3.,.. .,..:,-,r ., ..i x, '4.1:,......Y-:•-,...;,,....,., 1.'".;Arb, ....1. ,,.,.:-.-;:t-r-'‘'::::-.. i.v■ 1:IV-...4- ;,.-7,11,t;'4'..'."..:',.t t -..% ,4;:. :.4;; ..). !.kg■*••••- -1-•2••,,, -,.7.•,1:•:r•-'. ,2***,-.2- •l't• 3 /...'''. .;„Is7tir-.- 'A '.0114gli'le'l'- -.Y.-.;-,- ,-.,z A cp2m.... ,,I,,,,■.•..... !,,,,.'i.i"S L..: : 'I,ti r•:I ai7 i kr 1.,,:i'S:-.A., .f 'Y:NI:■f''."-,,..0 • A ,,,iltv:,,...-,',.•.,;--;...i..i.. 4ft,- ,:4,i-IrAq ....;,V Z.1,11•7/.'1715, ••• 10::c,.7..." , ;, ' ttg:"P;514.70i-4 '4!,-.i'v.....-.•-:-.:..'.; ;•-• ,1...-4..••••1.2.•-') ••••.*:-.•;"27 r•••••. •••,..,,.? .244-14,:41'75;14,1 12i2•••••••,-,`:•••:. ;..; .•''.?1.1V(1V.:4-4:;.' ';'-:',1 • r."..'•; ' R',.'•••,,,Ace'Ar....trtA.-... .' 't.,4.••••••••••:••‘ ' •' ,._;•,V,C,!2i4:!*-:,.. ..i."•1'•, 67.1....-...k••••••-••••••6' 2'.t 4'.:..:..'---'•••- ....?.,,,,..,..t.r..-.......x ,,I.`4.,:.?......,..": • • ,r,u.:,.,...vg4`§1.-4:.. :3-.,,•.' *-^s, ',;7::•:-•: '-:-%. -,.: '- ,,....4...t.--:.•:..--:.",' riiile- 'etee:-'14efft-Wniit..A. . .,,,,,,...,..,, ,..... ..:...,..,,...„,..... .. .• wpsiKco,,ili,r,.., .:..,,,,,...„...,.,..•,............ :,..,4,:.4q,..t;i: - ,..,.......7.,..:yr-.-, , . "?.:■-.-....-,...7!:'..!*':14. 1.444,:'.,•I'''''A/V: 'AuXbV• ....TC,...-::*..1';.' r.-... ....:;. - ..:.•..—: r.":7-1 1-41 11 IC'"7';'.'2"'V:t 2;r4A-V44.66.eil.?.:,,:i. -*Jr 1kt 4: t. • • ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO. 98-04 EXHIBIT FRED and SUSAN PASSMORE. 503 421433 P- 02 0 X04 Ilk CITY OF TIOARD • Community Lcvelop unt Sapi"g R Better Como:unity CITY OFTIGARD Washington County,Oregon .. :NOTICE OF.FINAL ORDER a BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL . Case Number(s): ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION CMCAI 98-0001 Case Name(s): . FISHER/PASSMORE FONNER STREET ANNEXATION Name of Owner: Fisher Properties Trust, SR Turner Construction and Carol Williams . Name of Applicant: Fred Passmore Address of Applicant: 7501 SW 195th Place City: Aloha State: Oregon Zip: 97007 Address of Property: 11370 SW Fonner Street City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97223 11300 SW Fonner Street City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97223 Tax Map & Lot No(s).: WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 02101; and 2S103AC,Tax Lot 02000. Request: 9 The property owners are requesting to annex 3.25 acres of residential property into the City of Tigard and change the zoning from County R-5 to City of Tigard R-4.5. • *Ton: 11370 SW Fonner Street, WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 02101; and 11300 SW.Fonner Street, WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 02000. ' . APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapter 18.136. Zone: Upon Annexation, the zoning designation of Washington County R-5 will be changed to City of Tigard Low Density Residential, R-4.5. Action: > ❑ Approval as Requested ❑ Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: © Owners of Record within the Required Distance © Affected Governmental Agencies t1 The Affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator ID The Applicant and Owner(s) Final Decision:33> �.�, v�� cOrtii dance THE DECISION WAS SIGNED ON /a4 , 1998 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON 3 /at , 1998. '-eSo w i art qF. LS Ile c,61-,,,-,4, e A. ... 4 lie The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. flA review of this decision may be obtained by filing a notice of intent with the Oregon Land eal: Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) according to their procedures. Questions: if you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division or the City Recorder at (503) 639-4171. ZCA 96001 FISHER/PA3SMORE FONNER ST.ANNEXATION NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BYT7iE CITY COUNCIL FRED and SUSAN PASSMO:RE. 503 6421403 P. Oa C OF TIGARD,OREGON ORDINANCE NO,98- v'1' 0 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A. ZONE CHANGE (ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION (ZCA) 98.0001 • . FISIIER/PASSMORE FONNER STREET ANNEXATION)AND DECLARING AN EI ECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on February 24, 1998 to,consider a zoning designation : for two(2)parcels of land located south'of SW Fanner Street,across from SW 113th Place; and • . . WHEREAS, on February 24, 1998 the Tigard City Council approved a Resolution to forward the proposed annexation to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission; and WHEREAS, the zoning district designation recommended by Planning Staff, as set forth in the attached staff report and in Section 1 below, is that which most closely approximates the Washington County land use designation while implementing the City of Tigard's existing comprehensive plan designation of Low Density Residential; R-4.5. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Upon annexation, the affected properties shall be designated as follows: Tax Mans/Lot Numbers 2S 103AC,Tax Lot 02000 • 2S•103AC,Tax Lot 02101 • Current Comprehensive Plan Designation • New Comprehensive Plan Desgnation Wash. Co.R-5 Low Density Residential • 0 Current Zoning New Zoning Wash. Co. R-5 Tigard R-4.5 SECTION 2: This Ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By Una.4'1l rY1OtS vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title - only, this .�1.& day of , 1998. 0‘2,+,i4z,A,<_:+t...e ,U)/-4_ecie_tA),, Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council thisox Q ' da • •f 4. "i __ .... ; 1 998. - s icoli, ayor Ap roved as to form: 02377.. 2 ■ 411 f • Date ORDINANCE No.98- /we isiryagdeore ca98.OI.ord Page I of 1 Jutia?H 11-F0-98 I:53 PH FR and SUSAN PASSMORE. 50321433 P. 04 • CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON . RESOLUTION NO.98- 13 A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY REFERED TO AS ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION (ZCA) 98-0001F - FISIIER/PASSMORE. .FONNER STREET • ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF TIGARD AS DESCRIBED IN.THE ATTACHED_"EXHIBIT A"AND FURTHER ILLUSTRATED IN THE ATTACHED "EXHIBIT B". • WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on February 24, 1998 to consider the annexation of two (2) parcels of land consisting of.a total of 3.25 acres located south of SW Fonner Street, across from 'SW 113th Place; and WHEREAS, the proposed annexation constitutes a minor boundary change under Boundary Commission Law ORS 199.410 to 199.519; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council is authorized by ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B) to initiate an annexation upon receiving consent in writing from a majority of the electors registered in the territory proposed to be annexed and written consent from owners of more than half of the land in the territory proposed to be annexed; and WHEREAS, the property which currently lies within the boundary of the Washington County Enhanced Sheriffs Patrol District, Washington County Urban Roads Maintenance District, Washington County Street • Lighting District #1 and the Washington County.Vector Control District would, by .operation of ORS 199.510, be automatically. and immediately withdrawn from those .districts .upon completion .of the annexation. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL THAT: SECTION 1: The Tigard City Council, pursuant to ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B), hereby initiates proceedings for annexation into the City of Tigard, the territory described in the attached "Exhibit A" and further illustrated in"Exhibit B". SECTION 2: The City Recorder is hereby directed to file certified copies of the Resolution with the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission at once. PASSED: • This p2 day of A A. /I . . _�, , 1998. •r-City of Tigard / ATTEST: ( yuc 6C,94,e City Recorder- City of Tigard Date RESOLUTION N75.1171 is citywidens\tc298•ol.ces Page 1 of 1 Julia P H 10-Feb-98 1:35 PM �' • OWNERSHIPS WITHIN 250 FEET • S EXHIBIT ��e -1 Prop ID : R470369 Ampeal Estate) owner: AORIsH, FRED C & LORETA ARAM Map Tax Lot : 2S13AC-0011W (229782) 1��385 SW FONNER ST Legal : ACRES 67 ^ TIGARD, OR 97223^ 411itus : 'Year Built : Living Area: Code Area : 023. 78 Sale Date : 04/21/93 Sale Price : 1997 Roll Values Deed Type : DBS Improvements $ 0 (+) Instrument : 93031114 Land $ 10, 050 (+) 1997 Tax Status Appraised $ 10, 050 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 46. 20 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : Taxable RMV $ 10, 050 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 3, 620 (1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary mary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More . Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : __ • - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Prop ID : R470387 (Real Estate) BRYAN P AND JULIE A tIlAp Tax Lot : 2S13AC- (222576) 11465 SW FONNER ST Legal : ACRES - . ou TIGARD, ,OR 97223 Situs : 11465 SW FONNER ST Year Built : 1960 Living Area: 600 �����ode Area : 023. 78 ��� -~- ,ale Date : 11/16/92 ' ` Sale Price.: 65, 000 1997 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 29, 750 (+) Instrument : 92082459 Land $ 53, 020 (+) 1997 Tax Status Appraised $ 82, 770 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 769. 45 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : Taxable RMV $ 82, 770 (=) * *** Unpaid Taxes *** M50 Assessed $ 60, 300 (1) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : __ - ^- Property Data Selection Menu - . - • -1 • Prop ID : R470396 (Real Estate ) • Owner: PARISH, FRED C & LORETA ARA Map Tax Lot : 2S13AC-01200 (229782) 11385 SW FONNER ST ~- Legal : ACRES . 46 TIGARD, OR 97223 Situs : 11385 SW FONNER • Year Built : 1930 Living Area: 2381 Code Area : 023. 78 Sale Date : 04/21/93 0 Sale Price : 1997 Roll Values )eed Type : DES Improvements $ 87, 640 (+) Instrument : 93031114 Land $ 55, 320 (+) 1997 Tax Status Appraised $ 142, 960 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 335. 03 Exeraptions $ '7! (-Y Special Assessments : Taxable RMV $ 142, 960 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 104, 620 . . . - ' . - . /Ai I ==r4 I I="~ Enter Option from Abov <RET> to Exit : _ - -WProperty Data Selection Mak - - . -1 Prop ID : R470403 (Real Estate) Owner: OAK RICKY J & BARBARA T 4liao Tax Lot : 2S13AC-01300 (190832) 11245 SW FONNER ST egal : ACRES . 51 TIGARD, OR 97223 ` ' Situs : 11245 SW FONNER Year Built : 1956 Living. Area: 1162 Code Area : 023. 78 Sale Date : 09/27193 • Sale Price : 1997 Roll Values Deed Type : DBS Improvements $ 50, 070 (+) Instrument : 93079875 Land $ 55, 320 (+) 1997 Tax Status Appraised $ 105, 390 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 983. 83 Exemptions � $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : - Taxable RMV $ 105, 390 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 77, 100 (1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : __ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Prop ID : R470412 (Real Estate) Map Tax Lot : 2S13AC-01400 (55365) 7205 SW VENTURA DR Legal : ACRES . 18 TIGARD, OR 97223 . 111 ,itus : 11235 S. W. FONNER . Year Built : 1942 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 Living _Area: 1008 Code Area : 023. 78 Sale Date : 04/28/93 Sale Price : 79, 900 1997 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 55, 860 (+) Instrument : 93032859 Land $ 46, 100 (+) 1997 Tax Status Appraised $ 101, 960 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 957. 79 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : Taxable RMV $ 101 , 960 (=) * *** Unpaid Taxes *** M50 Assessed $ 75, 060 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/ Impr (5) Gen Appr. (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Prop ID : R470537 (Real Estate) Owner: S R TURNER CONSTRUCTION LLC (328021 ) WILLIAMS, JAMES B/CAROL L Legal ACRES 2. 83 11300 -SW FONNER ST TIGARD, OR 97223 Situs : 11300 SW FONNER ST Year Built : 1951 Living Area: 2838 III :ode Area : 023. 78 Sale Date : 11/03/97 Sale Price : 390, 000 1997 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 97, 050 (+) Instrument : 97104588 Land $ 176, 500 (+) 1997 Tax Status Appraised $ 273, 550 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 2, 756. 17 Exemptions $ 0 (-) _. . . �^^^ ^ (1) Alt Disp (2)Amkrimary (3) Seconda (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6Wwnership (7) Historyll, (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 4Ikrop ID : R470555 (Real Estate) Owner: FISHER, THOMAS L Map Tax Lot : 2913AC-02101 (319288) PO BOX 11370 ,l : ACRES . 42 PORTLAND OR 97211 Legal . " Situs : 11370 SW FONNER Year Built : 1958 Living Areal 994 Code Area : 023. 78 Sale Date : 07/07/97 Sale Price: 110, 000 1997 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 53, 760 (+) Instrument : 97063273 Land $ 55, 320 (+) 1997 Tax Status Appraised $ 109, 080 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 006. 69 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : Taxable RMV $ 109, 080 (=) * *** Unpaid Taxes *** M50 Assessed $ 78, 890 (1) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/ Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More ' Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Prop ID : R470564 (Real Estate) Owner: HOLMES, ROBERT W � Tax Lot : 2S13AC-02200 II ( 104226) 11400 SW FONNER �� 'egal : ACRES . 64 TIGARD, OR 97���3 Situs : 11400 SW FONNER Year Built : 1952 Living Area: 878 Code Area : 023. 78 Sale Date : . Sale Price: 1997 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 53, 910 (-1-) Instrument : Land $ 59, 930 (+) 1997 Tax Status Appraised $ 113, 840 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 043. 94 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : Taxable RMV $ 113, 840 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 81, 810 ( 1) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : __ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Prop ID : R470573 (Real Estate) Owner: QUIMBY, ELEANOR N & EARL H Map Tax Lot : 2S13AC-0230GL (104227) 11480 SW FONNER ST Legal : ACRES . 64 TIGARD, OR 97223 111� Situs : 11480 SW FONNER Year Built : 1958 Living Area: 1098 Code Area ; O23. 78 Sale Date : Sale Price : 1997 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 68, 250 (+) r='4-..~.re:4- 2 1 ~.r4 k "�q q7.17i /+5 current Levzeo ! axes : z, mb ES. y/ hxemptzons $ zz, mmm (-) Special Assessments : Taxable/WV $ 117, 180 (=) * *** Unpaid TARIEs *** M50 AsseWed $ 83, 770 (1) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More 4) (5) c:nter Option from Above or <RET} to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Prop ID : R470582 (Real Estate) Owner: FILLER DAVID E MARY LYNN ( W FONNER IGARD, OR 97223 Situs : 11500 SW FONNER Year Built : 1955 Living Area: 2371 Code Area : 023. 78 . Sale Date : 06/01/78 Sale Price : 63, 000 1997 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 134, 840 (+) Instrument : 78036145 Land $ 49, 790 (+) 1997 Tax Status Appraised $ 184, 630 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 772. 32 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : Taxable RMV $ 184, 630 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 138, 890 (1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - ��� -1 • Prop ID : R470591 (Real Estate) Owner: BECK, JAY W AND NORA C . Lot : 2S13AC-02600 (104229) 11550 SW FONNER ST : ACRES 1. 35~~ TIGARD" OR 97223 Legal Situs : 11550 SW FONNER ST Year Built : 1988 TIGARD, OR 97223 Living Area: 4758 Code Area : 023. 74 Sale Date : 07/01/87 Sale Price : 80, 000 1997 Roll Values Deed Ty /e : Improvements $ 616, 690 (+) ' Land $ 124 d 124, 470 (+) Instrument : 87035864 L v 1997 Tax Status Appraised $ 741, 160 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 8, 487. 79 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : Taxable RMV $ 741, 160 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 565, 850 (1) Alt . Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More . Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - . -1 Prop ID : R2050336 (Real Estate) Owner: MYERS, RANDALL C & MELISSA ���N lap Tax Lot : 2S13AC-05000 (291496) 6655 SW HAMPTON #100 -- Legal : HUMBOLT CREEK ESTATES, LOT 1, ACRES PORTLAND, OR 97223 . 25 Situs : 12797 SW 113TH PL Year Built : 1996 Living Area: 2012 Code Area : 023. 78 . - ' - ' ~- '' ' '~- weed | ype : uw improvements w z�+��, mmm t+/ Instrument : 96023202 ��� d $ 55, 670 (+) 1997 Tax Status ��� ApprallIbd $ 204, 670 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 921. 47 Exemptions $ 0 (—) Special Assessments : 0. 00 Taxable RMV $ 204, 670 (=) jig *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 150, 5869 1.1 (1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : __ — — Property Data Selection Menu — — —1 Prop ID : R2050337 (Real Estate) Owner: DAHLEN, MARK S &. Mao Tax Lot : 2S13AC-05100 (297840) WHITE, JILL M. Legal : HUMBOLT CREEK ESTATES, LOT 2, ACRES 12775 SW Wgalimilim . 25 TIGARD. OR 97223 Situs : 12775 SW 113TH PL Year Built : 1954 Living Area: 1211 Code Area : 023. 78 Sale Date : 06/11/96 Sale Price : 122, 500 1997 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 83, 580 (+) Instrument : 96053219 Land $ 55, 670 (+) 1997 Tax Status Appraised $ 139, 250 (=) Cuppent Levied Taxes : 1, 237. 78 Exemptions $ 0 (—) Special Assessments : 0. 00 Taxable RMV $ 139, 2521 (=� * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 971000 (1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/imp-r, 0 (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : __ — — Property Data Selection Menu — — —1 I Prop ID : R2050338 (Real Estate) Owner: GARNER, DANNY A & KAREN E Map Tax Lot : 2S13AC-05200 (324143) 12753 SW 113TH PL Legal : HUMBOLT CREEK ESTATES, LOT 3, ACRES PORTLAND, OR 223 . 16 Situs : 12753 SW 113TH PL Year Built : 1996 Living Area: 2112 Code Area : 023. 78 Sale Date : 09/10/97 Sale Price : 219, 000 1997 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 161, 600 (+) Instrument : 97086400 Land $ 53, 020 (-1-) 1997 Tax Status Appraised $ 214, 620 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 2, 014. 64 Exemptions $ 0 (—) Special Assessments : 0. 00 Taxable RMV $ 2147620 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 157, 880 (1) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Option from Above or (RET) to Exit : _ "'Enter — — Property Data Selection Menu — — _I Prop ID : R2050339 (Real Estate) Owner: CONNELL. JAMES J Map Tax Lot : 2313AC-695300 (329393) 12731 SW 113TH PL Legal : HUMBOLT CREEK ESTATES, LOT 4, ACRES TIGARD, OR 97228 . 16 ' Lobe Hrea : mc:,:5. /u Sale Date : 12/01/97 �N� Sale Price : 198, 900 ��� 111/1997 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 153, 060 (+) Instrument : 97113585 Land $ 53, 020 (+) 1997 Tax Status Appraised $ 206, 080 (=) 4107urrent Levied Taxes : 1, 936. 18 Exemptions $ 0 (—) � special Assessments : 0. 00 Taxable RMV $ 206, 080 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 151, 730 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : __ — — Property Data Selection Menu — — —1 Prop ID : R2063268 (Real Estate) Owner: CALHOUN, CYNTHJA L jlalLjt : 2913AC-06100 (304892) 11340 SW FONNER " : PARTITION PLAT 1996-063, LOT 1, TIGARD, OR 97223 ACRES . 23 ' ` Situs : 11340 SW FONNER ST Year Built : 1940 Living Area: 829 Code Area : 023. 74 Sale Date : 10/14/96 Sale Price : 109, 000 1997 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ , 41, 450 (+) Instrument : 96092473 Land $ 46, 100 (+) 1997 Tax Status Appraised • $ 87, 550 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 011. 15 Exemptions $ ' 0 (—) Special Assessments : Taxable RMV ' $ ' 87,, 550 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 67, 410 ����� . �� (1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : __ ` — — Property Data Selection Menu — — —1 Prop ID : R2063269 (Real Estate) Owner: HOWARD, DAVID L & CHRISTA S Map Tax Lot : 2S13AC-06200 (327434) 11350 SW FONNER ST Legal : PARTITION PLAT 1996-063, LOT 2, PORTLAND, OR 97223 ACRES . 25- Situs : 11350 SW FONNER ST Year Built : 1997 Living Area: 2130 Code Area : 023. 74 Sale Date : 10/08/97 Sale Price : 234, 950 1997 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 161 , 490 (+) Instrument : 97096652 Land $ 46, 100 (+) 1997 Tax Status Appraised $ 207, 590 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 2, 397. 60 Exemptions $ 0 (—) Special Assessments : Taxable RMV $ 207, 590 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 159, 840 0 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ — — Property Data Selection Menu — — —1 Prop ID : R2072694 (Real Estate) Owner: GRECOv LEONARD R Map Tax Lot : 2S13AC-06300 • (271515) 8151 SIMMS SL � , "..�,"r,"^. = "+ 4""-, °"° . "� I "=mnp rn ummm= Situs : �� Year t : � �� LivinWArea: Code Area : 023. 74 Sale Date : Sale Price: 1997 Roll Values 410)eed Type : Improvements $ 0 (-1-) Instrument : Land $ 0 (+) 1997 Tax Status Appraised $ 0 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 0. 00 Exemptions $ 0 (—) Special Assessments. : Taxable RMV $ 0 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 0 (1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr . (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ — — Property Data Selection Menu — — —1 Prop ID : R2072695 (Real Estate) Owner: GRECO, LEONARD R Map Tax Lot : 2S13AC-06400 (271515) 8151 SIMMS SL • Legal : PARTITION PLAT 1997-080, LOT 2, ARVADA, CO 80005 • ACRES . 83 Situs : 11445 SW FONNER ST Year Built : 1930 TIGARD, OR 97223 Living Area: 756 Code Area : 023. 74 Sale Date : 2ale Price : 1997 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements A. N (+) Instrument : Land .11; 0 (+) 1997 Tax Status Appraised $ 0 (=) 410 .2urrent Levied s : 0. 00 Exemptions $ 0 (—) Special Assessments : Taxable RMV $ 0 (=c) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 0 (1) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ — — Property Data Selection Menu — — —1 Prop ID : R477344 (Real Estate) Owner: SHULTS. MITCHELL T/CARLA P Map Tax Lot : 2S13DB-00100 (209438) ��30 SW 115TH AVE Legal : ACRES . 96 � OR 97223 ' Situs : 13030 SW 115TH Year Built : 1940 • Living Area: 2644 Code Area : 023. 78 Sale Date : 05/04/92 Sale Price : 159, 900 1997 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 124, 390 (+) Instrument : 92030513 Land $ 85, 600 (+) ' 1997 Tax Status Appraised $ 209, 990 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 990. 65 Exemptions $ 0 (—) 40 Special Assessments : Taxable RMV $ 209, 990 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 156, 000 (1) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ — — Property Data Selection Menu — — _, . Map fax Lot : Eb1JUB-0:14WO \ zo�ir,:by/ 1141m s=ri / � u� ` Legal : GENESIS NQ��, LOT 81 RD, OR 97223. ` � ��� ��°C14-ct� y���r� x%��. 4- �� Situs : 11370 SW ERSTE PL Year Built : 1982 Living Area: 2109 • 4113de Area : 023. 74 ,`ale Date : 12/14/88 Sale Price : 100, 000 1997 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 136, 020 (+) Instrument : 88055932 Land $ 53, 700 (+) 1997 Tax Status Appraised $ 189, 720 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 2, 387. 88 • Exemptions S . 0 (—) Special Assessments : Taxable RMV $ 189, 720 (=) * *** Unpaid Taxes *** M50 Assessed $ 159, 190 (1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above. or <RET) to Exit : _ — — Property Data Selection Menu — — —1 • Prop ID : R1139477 (Real Estate) Owner: HONEYCUTT, EDWIN E JR & ETHI Mao Tax Lot : 2S13DB-09500 ( 164635) 11375 SW ERSTE PL Legal : GENESIS NO. 3, LOT 80 • TIGARD" OR 97223 Situs : 11375 SW ERSTE PL Year Built : 1982 Living Area: 2008 Code Area : 023. 74 Sale Date : 10/24/89 ale Price : 114, 000 1997 Roll Values . 41r ale Type : Improvements $ � 131, 940 (+> Instrument : 89051725 Land $ 53, 700 (+) 1997 Tax Status Appraised $ 185, 640 (=) ' Current Levied Taxes : 2, 321. 87 Exemptions $ 0 (—) Special Assessments : Taxable RMV $ 185, 640 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 154, 790 ( 1 ) it Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ —' — Property Data Selection Menu — — —1 Prop ID : R1139486 (Real Estate) Owner: CULBERTSON, JON C Map Tax Lot : 2S13DB-09600 (297916) 11385 SW ERSTE .PL Legal • : GENESIS NO. 3, LOT 79 TlGARD, OR 97223 Situs : 11385 SW ERSTE PL Year Built : 1983 Living Area: 1700 Code Area : 023. 74 Sale Date : 06/11/96 Sale Price : 20, 000 1997 Roll Values Deed Type : DES Improvements $ 129, 550 (+) Instrument : 96052773 Land $ 53, 700 (+) ���� 1997 Tax Status Appraised $ 183, 250 (=) ��� Current Levied Taxes : 2, 202. 93 Exemptions $ 0 (—) Special Assessments : Taxable RMV $ 183, 250 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed 1; 146, 860 (1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More O i CLEAN WATER SERVICES SENSITIVE AREA PRE-SCREENING SITE ASSESSMENT • • OMIT Sent By: HP Laser Jet 3100; -, A& 5032396133; Nov-1 1 10:05AM; Page 2/2 z4 :"'its Ip D __t i.C3 R::: D T T ' ileNumber -4( aearNia:;!\10'?: Services 1 OCT 1 9 2001 fe • _..i III Our Ommitiscnt is cicar; Sensitive Area Pre- creening Site Assessment By 7.. _ .i -. • : r.:: el • Junsdictioh • % 2z0t. Date ..• 10- 1,--01 • Map & Ta*Lot ,f63/90 0;,/0/ Owner ,11,061: l'74...rem - • Site AddrOs :: /./.376-: .4t4..) • .1 : 'd _rffik4i. ;OR Contact --Citgais—tiszt5_________. ProposeOetivitY ..:.: : Address eNg/ Se sftib000d 81,•:J. A . - ' iiF • AlrldAd t OR 9720a 0: • ;:. Phone 503 - 236-3575 ii, '4'. ' ..,■.a_ —■.. —. .* ,_....,.„._......_...,..... .",.. • P: .. • Y N NA :: . . Y sN NA • • .i.: Sensitive Area Composite Map • Stormwater Infrastructure maps E: CI rn'4';-' Miip # 2.1t• WA El 12 El as # •U 3 1 V . . ;i1., • • • 0 r-, ftrly: *ally adcipted studies or maps n ri Lip Other L-1 r Specify '. " Specify V t • : • Based 041:review of the above information and the requirements of Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Resolution and Order No 00-7: E SeitieitivEI areas pOteritially exist on site or within 200' of the site. THE APPLICANT ,.., • het,,.T PERFORM A SIT E CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE •• P-.!VIDER LETTER OR STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. If Sensitive Areas exton the site o'r:Within 200 feet on adjacent properties, a Natural Resources • As*ssment Report May also be required. • ..., ii0 Set4S.itive(:areas do:notappear to exist on site or within 200' of the site This pre- scitenini site assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect wakter quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your pr4perty; NO FURTHER SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS RaOIRED. THIS FORM WILL SERVE AS AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE A STCRMWATER CONNECTION PERMrT. . . 0 2:ThitpropOsed acOltlkdoes not meet the definition of development. NO SITE AsSEssmgrit 64:Spiiiibt PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. --- ::. ,..... , .,. . Comments . • •,,,.:: . • . • 4: : . • : . x• • . :-:.,. •• . • FL . . . : 2 • , , Reviewed By :; e.4.41 41.,..4,,,..._ Date: ,p• ;L,7.-of ' . ::;'. • . . . •zr.: : . i7i. '• . . . ip ,•: • III Returned tii Applicant Mail K p-0:_. iC winter : Date to.14.?_..74.1 By ..., . , . .:. : . . : • • ,::2: • : . . . . . : • • • • • TREE PROTECTION PLAN • • NIOIT Sent By: HP Laser Jet 3100; 5032396133; Nov-4111 :25PM; Page 2 , .. 11/09/2001 . e7p1 ii5037747gji. COLLIER ARBOR. CA PAGE 01 . • . .• 4..! . • - . ' 1Z: . • • • .• .6%4". COLLIER ... • . :„:.. . • . . , . • .-. ..5: . ?.. 52.• • .:. . : : 0 . 3 .• . : • : . .' i . .•. ...,... ARBOR CARE • . ,•„, , : . • . . ..p.,,, .•: , . • . EnFirOnmentallyr-riendly,...Since 1937 - ..... . • . , ' P .... 9032 SE Division, Portland, OR 97266 . F.,•• :: • - • : . • . . ' a ... ',.. ' . . • . . '....1 ...:. . . . , . . • • . • • . . . NOveiber 9, 001 • ..1.. • : . . • . • . • , i'•,; • _ _'", • . .. . . . . . . . . • Mt. Cl:garles Martin . :: : i • . . • '944 SEASellwOod Filvd.:.*:. :•' • . .. . • . ..4.4. — • :• : • . • P Ortlatid,'OR97202 : .• • . . . ' . .. • . • • 5g • " . : . . . . . 1 . , 1.7 , ::- .. ; ', , • . . • • Re: Tr4e:preiervation:Plan for a minor land partition development located at SW • . . . kmn0.ISt,Tigard, Oregon. • . • . - . i• ' . • . . Ev • ,.:• • • . • • . . . . . E.g. • • ••• • • . . : . • * Dear :Martin, • • . .. • . • • . • • '4:;.i • , . .. • . , • . . • er -:. . . . . .. . , . . . . At yoltg request,,I am to conduct a tree inventory and provide a tree protection plan for .• the tre0:1e.c4ed,at the above address. I understand that a larger lot is being divided into . two p*cels and I am to inventory the trees on the back or southerly lot I am to make recommendations as to which trees are good candidates to be successfully retained in the . - landsciipe. The trees will be visually inspected above ground, identiAed according to . ... . • . (.speciet meaauxed for diameter 'and are located on ksite plan you have provided me. .. III . Trees 412-in4hes in dianieter and larger will be inspected. I will provide a tree - • - . preservation plan to 'help protect the trees recommended for preservation during • .. . . • const rtfction.:::: . .• :' : ,- . . . . . . • . ::i•,Ti. . . • . . ..i.,. .., . , . • y...i:.• • • • SUMMARY • • . • . ,,,..it,.• .i. . : . . ..... , • .• : : • • . . , • p:: •:. •• • : . • • There:ire 13 trees located on the site pvqr.1Zikaches in diameter, Four trees (1 apple, I . . . , • ..r.g. ',:. •• .• . cherry4 and birch),ate.,rectiliniended for due,.0 probable construction conflicts. The . " . total diiiinetet irichsei:tlie removed trees equals 75 inches. Nine trees(8 Douglas firs, I ' . WillovO, re.iecimirii en*cli'for, seservation. Theilital',diarneter inches of the preserved trees equals4, . ; : . .. . - - . • . . . . ' f.:g ....i.::';' • P.'I • . . . gf, . ,..,:,....• ' ....11:::720:.10ThNeS,site • ,. r:.,'iv . . . .' 1 • ' !,;'. - . . . . 4,7,7,;.:‘.a •;• 7: . • .. • . • ' I .ezadOed.the trees' at t*.site ont is a back yard that is:relative • - • leyeliMOst 4f the sige.fikrt frees are located on the back property line There are 13 . . • • • ...;ii:S.S1.,*ated On the dif4k4tti..Zinches in-diameter.Eight of the thirteen treesAre Douglas .. . (Fiti e do tiuga motile s.14. The five other Ireesr alt:ZArirches (Betulapenchilci); 1 apple . '. . (1<raluispp.).1.:1...cherriji (Prunus sp,p,) and 1 wetp%gi*illow (Salix,bcsby lonica). One •,.' addititiber aOle..tilat is 9-inches in diameter Was':liecated on the west property line..lt is • ' • • • ',!.. . •.licateit n.ear the propciSedibuilding.to0Pript.The apple is not a significant treeli.e..):ess., .• ' - r r). 7. • . • than'll-intes in dian*ter) and is keeiiiisitnenaed for removal, ' ,,,,,, 7 .',.. I.•-:...,.'. • i.''': ' ... !...• • %•.::i,E.t..• ■•„ ,..., :..„.::,..... •• , , • .. . , . ,, . . ,-0.•''...*; ';''•. v'," li .• •••••1... *". .:.:''''.......;•.1":2:!,.. ... ...‘.. •'• . •III . • ...„, . . • if. :: ., •,., A • . : • ,,,,f. :- . ...; • : i•1, ■ ••• , •..' . 1 .. • .. ,..... . i . • • . . if ...: : :. C,••••'''''........ ■ ' ';....., . • . ::%:??,: • •? ... , i's:,::::;;"......,. „.........,%*:•./' •.. :. • • 4 4, I. . Portland: 5031774.902 ::: VancorCie 141")-493.:6T15ri ,v. Cilc1.774_7()R1 g . : • Sent By: HP Laser Jet 3100; 5032396133; Nov-9-il 11 :26PM; Page 3 . AK 11/09/2001. 0701 ::503774791. COLLIER ARBOR CAR PAGE 02 .• • 1,:y. :. ..: . . .• . . . .Martirth'ree eport : • I Page2 of 4 III • • ,..„ . ,•,,,. . . • • : . . • . . .• ,,,•• TREE INVENTOM? .• ::::::: . • • ,:il . • . . . • . • The fcli3Owini 13 trees over 12-inches in diameter Were: identified by species, measured „•• for tnitilc diameter, visually rated for crown condition, and recommended for 'either rembv0 or pteservatibtii(table #1). Tree diameter waineasured at 4.5-feet above grade • uniessii-loted because c rii'uttiple.trunks. If the tree had multiple trunks it was rr}easured ' below4he fodc. The condition of the trees was rated by good, fair, and poor assessments aCcordgto the following definitions. • . , w. ..,. . . . • g•.•: • :: . Good...,- trunk and crown have no significant problems observed, and growth rate is • • ;••••":•• - • • qitotrriiil: . • , . ,:•••, - . . . ,....,: • :. .• . • . . ri • n • LI 'air.-'$ome trunk and crown problems observed; growth rate reduced. • . rs• •••• . 0.,•3 :: • . . . • • . . -, • , . . ..4loor 4:significant trunk and crown problems observed that limits life span and is a . ,•• . high hazard potential for failure. Growth rate is poor. , . • - • . . . . . . _ . , 4... .. . ':53.: .• ., • • .:. . TABLE #1 , • . r•:::• . :. . • S ,..14ies •;, . inChes Condition Action Comment . Douglas fit • :: 35: Good : Save III DoVas fit '.28:'' Good Save Dotfifas ft :: 40 . Good . : Save • . • 2-trunks. • , . :-Dilas fir .•22 Good • : Save . • -_-__. _,— • Do las fit • • . 3•: Good • .: Save ' • • Do4r1as fir; • :30 Good ' Save . • Douglas fit .:37 Good : Save . .. • •Dot*las fi f ••34: Good . Save , , _.■ • . fl::: .i under.34" fir, • IA5llow • 25i Fair . , • Save • :,,•:,.• z . deadwood in crown . • Apple ..': .',.I3i• 000d Remove . , 4-trunks; near house • - iClerrY .. ,. . : plk • Good 14Move ' 4-trunks, near house • . • • Birch '2a. Fair remove . In driveway ''' • • - • .. :.1R.1 rch '' . ::: 1.8; Fair• . itemove In driveway - . 'final • ..349: , ' •• • . ...... • 1,, ■ •:;;:'::: :. . • • ' . . . • :->:::. • . .i. . . . ?,••;•,•• • . . : '.•0:': ;; • • • . ty, ; • : TREE INVENTORY SUMMARY • •1A = ,•;., :: • . • . . . . Of tht#13 trees, four are recommended for removal due to probable construction conflicts and nice are recommended for preservation. The total diameter inches of the removed • . , trees tuals 75 inches;..the total diameter inches of the preserved trees equals 274. The • • total *meter. of all'13:trees is 349 inches. 1111) •:::.,. •• ....,"..: : . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ' . • . . . 4,:. .:.. . . . . . . . . , . . • , © Co0W.Afbor Care, Inc:: • ' . , 1 1/9/2001 • ; 7 , 5 •:: ' . • • • • • F; ".'.. . . • . : . • • g . I:: . • . . . • . . , . Sent By: HP LaserJet 3100; 5032396133; Nov-9R-4611 :26PM; Page 4/8 11/09/2001• 07;;41 i 503774793 COLLIER ARBOR CA PAGE PAGE 03 J 1 1 { . . Martini Tree Report : • . Page3 of 4 (DISCUSSION • i Sent By: HP LaserJet 3100; 5032396133; Nov-9-0' 11 :27PM; Page 5/8 4; . 11/09/2001. 87;;41 5037747.93. COLLIER ARBOR CA PAGE 04 • ' • Martix• ree Report . • Paged of a • a:. • .n , is CONCLUSION • %.*. • The t :preservation pl.ar takes into consideration saving the maximum number of the ' ' healthi• st trees that have the highest chance of survival and do not pose an unreasonable risk•ot damage to peolsle and structures. The trees recommended as saves are good candic litcs to,: retain in Ohe•landscape The trees recommended* for removal are within buildii')g envelopes,haiie unavoidable construction conflicts, are considered hazardous, or • • are in very poor condition and have a low chance for long-term survival, . . ff.,r • • "= RECOMMENDATIONS . _ e lm'plemc4t the Tree.Pttesetvation Plan (Appendix'#2) under the supervision of the col ulting arbozist.: • Preserve•trees in large groups or groves where possible as shown on the plan. • • : Thi The consulting arbotist shall establish a tree protection zone with protective chain 14 fencing to preserve root systems. • e • Lobate the house to the front of the proposed building footprint to give as much • ' did ance as possible for protection of the large firs located on the back (southerly) . . . prc Qerty line. • : . F • Z Care his bean taken to III •:obtain'all information from reliable sources. All data has been verifie .i•nsofar as possible5 however, ,the arborist can neither guarantee nor •be • • responble for the accuracy of information provided by others. The information contai d in •this report reflects the condition of those items at the .time of inspection. . There gs no warranty or•guarantee, expressed or implied, that problems Cr deficiencies of • . •the tre+Os in question may not arise in the future- ' • Pleasetontact me if you have any,fllrther questions. - . Respectfully ,i; : ' . ,s • , Terrillt offer . : • , ConsuOirng'Atborist • : •• Apper ix# 1 Site Plan• - • . , Appeuuix#2 Tree Preservation Plan. , • • ©Cofer:Arbor Care, Inc., • 11/9/2001- Y • a 2M • • Sent By: HP LaserJet 3100; 5032396133; Nov-9-SIL 11 :27PM; Page 6/8 11/09/2001: 07$41 50377479• COLLIER ARBOR CARIIIP PAGE 05 yp;` Appen4i #1 Srce Plan Page 1 of 1• • Ivtardn ree Region ac)' _4N • A •:: r–.--,----?..----;—.- ;:' 15% 41-,• 1i" '-1 :•. 35•. • r�r. r• I NI 5= :I Glvc.. — t.� to'.s6 1 • I ►�,5a a. O 13' • ao i� ' 4 r^ct•R Proyc-tgct togs e ', .„.14;•,T'•- ,� t 3.01 y c 0 ��r14 c ( 16 i o A --t.. s-I-•1 I 50.4-+..,• • H. 2 •M -`'..........-.^.-7"--...........* d. • • • 'k: ti., j 30, 53 5. t l 0.• FIu1 f >.;, . . / p,,,t, Ni: • • • .• • ;y • `q` . • CCollieri•*sbor cares Inc 11/9/01 • • • . • 4: . Sent By: HP LaserJet 3100; 5032396133; Nov-9- 11 :28PM; Page 7/8 11/09/2001. 0?_;x:41 50377479 COLLIER ARBOR CAR PAGE F.IF Appen4 #2 ; . : Pagel of2 Martin tree Report• • • • '' . TREE PROTECTION SPECIFICATIONS ' •I. Building Construction •• 1. T1•94:. building contractor and all•sub contractors involved with site work around trees • sub;as grading; utilities, building, landscaping; etc. are rewired. to meet with the • • • . cortstilting arborist:fat the site prior to beginning work to review all work procedures, ' • J A . acss.and haul routes, and tree protection measures. • w • • • 2.:. Es' blisha Tree Protection Zone as directed'by the consulting arborist to Protect and • . preserve the tree and it's root system. Install temporary protective chain link fencing • or x. ow Fencing, to establish a Tree.Protection Zone, Place the•protective fencing • : ardUnd the edge of a drip line(the area below the spread of the branches)'of the tree. • F'o ::trees teyith narrovlr growth habit, the Tree Protection Zone extends beyond the drip • • • ling':and the fencing shall be placed under direction of the consulting arborist. Tree Protection Zones will be established prior to constriction. 3.. Co struction activities within the Tree Protection Zone are prohibited except by . e> nissioh and su .rvision of the consulting arborist. p Pe: g 4.. Protect the tree against cutting, skinning or breaking of branches, trunk and roots. '" ' • III • S.• StOlipilizig of materials, vehicle operation, and parking is prohibited in the Tree • • Protection Zone. • . '6.: lvl tain:existing grade within the Tree Protection Zone, Raising or lowering grades•C,, :• araprohibited except as permitted by and under '.the supervision of the consulting airist. '. . h 7.: R oval of branches Or root pruning of trees to remain is to be performed by a quifted arborist under the supervision of the consulting arborist. • 8.: im Pri* g-::trees shall be pruned prior.to the start of construction. Trees shall be crown • clamed tcf remove the deadwood 2 inches in diameter and over Trees shall be crown . . thi; rted by 10-20* tinder,the direction of the consulting arborist crowns may be railed by:removing:tiotiom branches as necessary up to 14 feet high to give clearance ' . for any construction a4tivities, traffic, etc. All work to be done in accordance with ' ' . Intiatiofial Society:ofArboriculture pruning standards. ' . Z1 9. Cut branches and root with sharp pruning instruments that de not chop or tear. ' • • .10. Exiavaticin and trenching around tree roots within the Tree Protection Zone is • prohibited except by Permission and under the supervision of the consulting arborist:• ::::.. .. . . . • . . .III „ • ;w, . • • . . . . . • ,.,,,, . ; : . . ©Co11ie.Arbor Caro,Inc. 11/9/01 • yY Sent By: HP LaserJet 3100; 5032396133; Nov-9- 11 :28PM; Page 8/8 11/09/2001. 01:41 ; 503774731 COLLIER ARBOR CARE PAGE 07 Appeau c#2 Page 2 of 2 Martin •roe Report . Y • Ci1. .4 l.: 11. W A tropching is required within the dripline of the tree, tunnel under roots by hand . 'diiag, Do not cut roots larger than 3 inches in diameter. Cut smaller roots•only if • th4 interfere with new work and only with a sharp instrument. : 12.Dc not allow•any exposed or cut roots to dry out before permanent backfill is placed. • . Prcwide a temporary '.earth cover or mulch to keep exposed roots moist until pempclanent backfill is placed, . 13. Ansi damage to trees during construction activities 'shall be reported to the consulting arb)rist N4ithin 6 houts:so that remedial action can be taken. Timeliness is critical to ' their-et health. • IC Wfier trees to remain; as necessary to maintain their health during the course of • cotruction. . • • . • 15, Fes jlizing - the trees shall be subsurface fertilized •with a complete s)ow release • fert izer end a root.stimulant to promote good health and vigor. Initial fertilizing • should bedone prior'to`starting of the construction and continue annually for at least. . . 3 ygars. Y •If 16: Cor itractoE is responsible for any and all damage to the tree during the course of • con*ruction. The contractor shall pay to the tree owner the value of the damaged tree• as a3tsblished by the consulting arborist. • • • ∎ ;::'.'4 1.4:: • ti:h ay. • . h.i ' sr• O is • •t4Collier Arbor Care,loc. 11/9/01 • 's'•` ° •• MiJ'2oo1 - coo 14 /IA R5 • I 1 I W 'f I I W 1 LEGEND _- I -� Q_____ ____ _____ _____ ____ _______ ____ _ -- - 0.. .�1. k. • EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN 0 '4' • I. I 00 I 1 EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE TO REMAIN L I L 5000 I I I ! EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED �- , ,%) .c . A ° I xcv‘ 18Z . .. 18.5' t00 r rr --I EXISTING 5' CONTOUR •a I3L .� -+-� to N"-- • --_____to3 EXISTING 1' CONTOUR t� ao F-- N EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING I1 I PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR ! • o i x o 16 N co [� vmrn N EDGE OF FLOW LINE MAILBOX CURB ' "� PAVEMENT BEGINS TYP. w I — PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR CL (T1��P.) EXISTING I L -� ") o » I --1 p O 0110 S87 46 DOW UTILITY POLE / 1 o o EXISTING .-- TREE ABREVIATIONS �- WATER METER 80, 1 0 . I I rL . ago .. TO BE - AP APPLE _ v) 6 a I AS - ASH o ,a u) w o REMOVED �'� _ �/� ._ W a 2 (no r �✓J r c� B I BIRCH ` ,c, EL _�___ `� — _' _ "' CH = CHERRY a E v 0 -- �O',".'_"" I� ^ _`.;_.... © x FI = FIR a :� UcnCLF-- I___ L _- _ - ' -\ H0 = HOLLY "" _ 9 x-ss OA -- OAK � it�.+..►+- ,,. - ji Q FONE�� 1\ w -- ..._. _ _ --� _. ___ ::.�+_.-__-_.�- �_, a Q � x-s -- ��.___ - PINE �� • - o • x---ss - � ----- � � -- -• _ _... � — SP - SPRUCE x-ss x-ss . * 16 EXIST. _ _ _• _ , — °- DRIVEWAY _ _ _ ,' _ �i , 98 FI-24 = 24" CALIPER FIR F.::. � Q v1 — • — ,�� ;� ENTRANCE -- __`_=- - "-_ �,� D'WAY -_ %' ,� A� __ - 24" WATER (MEASURED 4 FE=ET ABOVE GROUND LEVEL) t�c _N WV OO A'`-i""- ER _ 24" WATERS __ _ ----\_- __ _ - - WATER 6 WA <'� N° 1 . e 24 HAT ,x.0.1-, ,�,.�����.��► - 6►� WATER ___ - J 4►, WATER WATER - -, g" WATER` �� -- _7 `- r 99 Ci_A �W4TER \.• _ D 6 WATER ��►_ 6„ WATER ____ ��'� -`_1 ""\\ '-' -!--- `# Ld 0 .CT D WAY � \ -- C� p F=,/�/ . - NOTE. EXISTING DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE TO BE CD p o , • --.-.A. ,,,...... •,..„ .• .. 10,--t TV\TO'�j.�► '!;.1 11* . OA-32 '� .,___ EXISTING 101 I FLOW IMPROVED PER CITY OF TIGARD. CO I— v >, ''/ r: '. '.. ` . •-- -')I TC H ` L I N E I INSTALL CB . ::... ,. .. I <, U I � ` . : .. : :.� TYP.` /`` EXISTING T 0 0 C/�� . . . .. N, w` » -)If• I 12 CULVERT 0 t's EL EXISTING , :. �� _ a.7. WATER INSTALL SANITARY •/ J HYDRANT SEWER STUB ; / ..:.,,. � ..-. , � - ......:.:. 18.52 I / i lfe?�;� ':5:99 ,. INSTALL DOUBLE , ,! . :.. :.� ,° 1 WATER METER . ".....a..,..:,..;. :•. r` ' ‘...r• 10' WIDE R.0. W. DEDICATION Ca '� %.,; 4 '.• EXISTING .`� HOUSE `� ..•-:41, ,-t TO REMAIN ;; ,` ,'-;o z EXISTING ,� w I 610 0 �- EDGE OF �.%�,' _ ___�'..' w C.� gAY �, , ,r`_ � � ��� � � � z %i /� EXISTING a. 1 % re-NN. I kjj 1 '± HIGH 1 w N • o, , = r ,,,,,,",,,, STONE WALL z ec /A, ■ ' ,t(ii,,,„„04.- .6---------.....• 7 105 -' % , F/*/DRIVEWAY �o'� -_ o M p (4 . .---------/ t cn o IMPROVEMENTS , r,,,� o X .� � � EXISTING w • q CLOTHES �� S, hip .., �,. h FLDW LINE . ////,,,% LINES 72 �, SL = 57f o • o o I >Z Ei ° w V W _I a. U OZ 0 EXISTING a l 5 0 4' HIGH N FENCE 1Q ___- i ;Q 6200 T_ � � (TYP.) ' ' • CD c�;U___ . .\\ I s •ct 4 , .O . 2 . .. 0 , ? ^o-. CU JO ' „ ' A .`. ign C kJ ) ....... ... I ,L '':':Des . 2`\ ' ' — cri t:i., , i..1 Groin cri --, ,Q ,,, Inc. Planners , ,I CH-24 , n.,� GRAPHIC SCALE Engineers L.) . , g CD EXISTING ,. �.,..f FI--36 o § t-i _ . �° '° 20 �° �° Surveyors ' SHED TO -' -� ; t. y .. . • , r. 3.500 N.W. 211TH TERRACE u�`FI—�4. � `.` � I �:`"�` � HO:.LS80R0, OREGON 97124 °' \t----__ _ 108-— a • ( N FEET ) t`HONE:(: 3) 858-4242 T� gyp, `p w& L .�. ..� 4wo - , AL- �� _ _� - 1 inch - 20 ft. Eww�5dcdesign.com00 -�.�, ca. � ," _ ���u�u,,, _-- ‘��tiu►,,,,_ 11x17 PAPER SIZE, SCALE: 1"=40' J D - ' • •` - (JóB97 s�o cm 8 -c 7 SHEET N0. o I I N87°46'OO"E u" 2 ,, .., -. 1 80. 10' Cr)r, I OF o a / 14,P JO// 1 1 I 1 I , "N IL 6300 IL 1200 1 IL 5100 .., ,. - , ' 0 INDEX OF DRAWINGS , .._ 2 < sc, --I , a_ PAGE No. DRAWING TITLE „,......_ , \ ,,_ , ,:,, - 1 of 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT , › - 2 of 3 , _____ _ — — — — — PRELIMINARY UTILITY & GRADING ______ ___ ---- — — — r I PLAN ‘Y )—, of 3 4 'r, 3 , ---_, cr ON—SITE ANALYSIS & FUTURE IL 5000 ,, \ , I "‘"”" STREET PLAN 18.5' 18.5' , , I ,- 1 ,. .. 3r I ) CO I34,7 w . _, ,..->.T., a jar-- ,,! ivazu c.., 3-4„cf,...11 g 7 t r4" t--. ea / - .. .1- -7 ' C. ugs17artit atiql -. ......... ... * ' '''....9 °' ‘,,,,-'11111; , ...OS MATH ?4244sTA: S'large .. 00111: , „ FIs re , i . r feros' SV MIL Yltv r -, 4 ,...?, . 0 ***4 tivr7 c re) _____„----• Alri !at I • _1— ,41 — — — — — — — — — — .0 f.. 44 ez ) N. 4, to ___ f......ii 7, syit.7-jiz E.' i — — — — !____ .te •-67, A •IA . .(c#30 ____ _ _____ — —1-- (,,, x Sw r?.". - TIGARD A.....1,A ui,If. e. Dit' , sw,a10: sv,-;44‹,.., :isw. 77, 1: ;11300 ST - * 1 1 i3cfli — — — 8... ST. .,, ,,-j,„ v ' sr.c.,.. . c, ..,.. ),,,,, - 4 Ai. r, sw LEWIS if"; i 4 _____ 7 FONNER ..,Loma e t t , rAtcs* su c$Fig r 1.!. ,. z 74gi si: 2: G Ai 'RD ,§1: * tvl *4" .;iii. ...,' q sm. ,e) — —10--- — — ist ft-. 3 _ 4 -1 z 1, vi, , ou T?S ‘- ,, sT , 4- I ..:4,,1411*t3W 4 X a, -4t. 7.. -41 a JaDiER i--.., 4T al ‘....,t . . - _ _ _ _SW IA.1412d tilliii., *, /4,,, ,,* , 4* _ ______ _ ... _____ _ __________ ____ ________--..— E. , , --w„,... s ......:::.4.4,'" ,„. . z _ ______— _ _______-- c, sec,S* 4‘ la JACK 2' it 1114 S T' 12 ,,, , P N. $4, \--- 4 _ — _.... si , . .. ,... .s, SP 8 ,',.. c.-.,,,,,-- 11. 1.) 0 11.1 ii- S/,8/74,6, '00”W 80.10' ___ _ ___„ _ _____ _ ______ ,..„, ....., s..EPAI 4 -,,,c-n ,„:„, :,!.., iloo ,,,, 1.,..,',-Nt-,,,,,,,, - • •• sw....7 7 1>,..... :1 . SW7.1 E!el ST T - ... '4,‘" :-,• , e•-. CNI '1"- d ,t ,p. § , it_ _____ _____ _ _____ — g .A \l'-‘ ,.. ''`i i C /1 "A ,..,, . Inoo 1 IMO Ur itC C 7 N - , .3‘f \ 1. c• - 414,71 I, 1—°- titi — — — — — — — — — -: ...7.,:,.. z/LO.L.,141.,D.5 .R.O..W.>EDICATION ',/,/,d: sw-, I _,,, KoT, C t SW AlkirTA ST ,....„..pi ,,, .110 s• tiArmis „,,, O , , 0., • .• I ...j ,12500 FL—, `044‘ A./ N... i Ce —i Q. , - .- 4. - . 4 4, s t.:4, _z , .sw IL 2300 IL 2200 , ... •/ °Kr 1 I IL 6100 ... MILAwili M 0 0 •Nee• .'41)/7 1 7,515.12 sq.ft. I IL 2000 0 >s i 4c:C cs VISUAL CLEARANCE I 18.52' R ..:-` ,, I -- ,4. .. -.,FA • c.,,'„' PA - no s: sr *-- / i ..- 0 i"I Z 4 ilt* - fiatotA IP '17, " 4,„ 47 AREA (NO FENCE/WALL) 5.9_95 so A. „is r. . ism,. ; --- EXISTING I .4 , _i_ ..5 ,• 10111- 1 LW& flip' ..." :or• mazia*le....: 911, 1 c, t,..7K-aIi,. , „el, .., Int , ..- . . " • IN riMPILII 't re, Li K .4, 'CO co TO REMAIN t< `.." m 18.52' P4 : * *iimuildinkilersafilillialliimKiliflaWikunwilinii . , _ .6 05'-- '6 I--- I- i'tt .- -- .:- ,,,111% lc".o.rue ' •A. 4 a 0) : , c NI 1 w 1 1---. LI:, ... ' - ;:. —,,, — -- '. 4 1 IIE ,. -.4. Pr , L, 1 ' ,....,t ,41 yn'l v Mil ''*1 411:innualliiiih•Thlt 2! CV , SCREENING & BUFFERING: o ., MINIMUM 5' HIGH FENCE/ ..<1- >- WALL ALONG BOTH SIDES v- ' - it u) VICINInf MAP ix OF FLAG POLE; VISUAL 0 • >7 SCALE: N. T. S. z CLEARANCE AREA WILL 0 w .... BE MAINTAINED. kJ t 01 0 1 e (1. 0 15.00' 64.98' 1)• 0 LLI Cr in 0 . 0 i I i SITE DATA 2 TL 6200 I _ _ o) co NET 8,135.22 sq.ft. .4 , 1 fri 0 APPLICANT: GROSS 9,837.31 sq.ft. to oi I m oo ob co TL 2400 I 2 1 -,...-. I OWNER: THOMAS L. FISHER P.O. BOX 11370 7, ...: PORTLAND, OREGON 97211 0, i EXISTING h4 (.1 SHED TO PROPOSAL: 2-LOT PARTITION r — BE REMOVED L — J EXISTING ZONING: R-4.5, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 8 . 3 - _ _ ____ — s• SIZE: 0.42 ACRES — — _ — — — _ N8746'00"E 80.10' 40 _ — — — _ .1.1..." ■ii■ TOPOGRAPHY: FIELD SURVEY BY L.D.C. .,-..,..,,,,, /-'..-- a 1 GN — — LEGAL 115.11°A0 GROUP _ _ AWNWWW, AWINNWIIM OWWWW VIIIIINWINA AWNIWW WAWA DESCRIPTION: TAX LOT 2101, TAX MAP 2S 1 3AC INNIWINA AANANN MAW 41,... .11011W .... ANA NNW .., .., CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ............ ... .. --- — ............. ............. ........ -......... STORM: CONSUL7WG ENGINEERS — — ........... ........ — —. LAND USE PLANNERS —. 0111111 SANITARY SEWER: CITY OF TIGARD WINNOWA momaror LAND SURVEYORS I NOTE: ..... ANIMINA MINIM MAW .1111111 ge, .11111111 .....,.............. 233 SI. WASHINGTON ST. PARCELS 1 & 2 MEET WATER: CITY OF TIGARD HaiSBORO, OREGON 97123 _____1 BASIC SOLAR ACCESS GRAPHIC SCALE ELECTRIC: P.G.E. 648-4061 FAX:503 - 681-7848 REQUIREMENTS. 30 0 15 30 60 120 TELEPHONE: G.T.E. DIAL: IsIchee-z.net IL 2600 lowN6Iliiiimilmassimmimi FIRE: TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE JOB NO.: 2297 ORA$NG NO. ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 30 ft. AIIIIIMINIMMINIMINI 11x17 PAPER SIZE, SCALE: 1"=60' OF \. 3 - • , I I 1 I I IL 6300 IL 1200 1 IL 5100 ,., I -\\ I ,„,,,,,,,, 0 . ,,;. \ - < I LEGEND I ., 2 . . v-", 1 . ',, .'' o_ Cl-,,, ‘...... EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN .- ilg • EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE TO REMAIN ,,_ _ _ _____ _____ — — _ _ _ _ ____ -,.--.:,, ' = I)1< „6-, --;) I G EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED I IL 5000 . ,. . ,, 1 18.5' 18.5' 4*•''''..."1.1. "•■■■,...... EXISTING 5' CONTOUR 4 v ,,-2.-3) 1 ,..., ,. I . 311' 1 -- - -- --193 ---- -- -- EXISTING 1' CONTOUR ,,,‘,..:, EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING • (" 1 UM EDGE OF FLOW LINE MAILBOX CURB > > ' PROPOSED 5 CONTOUR &- PAVEMENT BEGINS (TYP.) ) (TYP.) EXISTING (/) I MI PROPOS 1' CONTOUR ct § EXISTING I S8746'00"W UTILITY POLE TO X R lee WATER METER 80.10r-- BE RELOCATED / _ ____ ____ .......-ci. TO BE x REMOVED if, — — II — _ i ee gi35 . ___--- 1u) w 2 TREE ABREVIATIONS dO .... '‘ e.___ — ... ZS illr .. . r...................-- ••••■11111116—...11■111 .1 14. 8 ____ ___, . AP = APPLE _____ 1 . ik........... -- _ _ - _ 9. x-ss ST. AS = ASH r-•-•/ .......aii,...r...r....„....2Q.e... FONNER— -y..... s _ _. — _ - ___ - - x_ss Ie),:a, IP 0. BI = BIRCH — — ----- 74 — — — '0, S.W.,x■st _ ______ x-ss _ ....I, x-ss AA, , -,-- ------(8.- _ .7*, ... _ Z x-ss ____ ,,,..-- - - CH = CHERRY 0 c ®-- • — -_____—_ __-' 4. .... , 98 Fl = D'WAY „,,94.; T,.....- - 24- WATER HO = HOLLY ob % 4 irl ... ,„ — q OA = OAK .- A -9,, 24 WATER -74!!_ _ ..A......, _ ,Ammiw, -----24- WATER -------24* WATER .. .., 111111Mirg' . -------c v4T-Eri 4 24" WATER wor_ 6 WATER _ — toi_ ... 2...4- WATER .. .... 0.. 100 PI = PINE < cs1 v" a. -------------6" WATER 6'7'7MR:- ,-,,,dillwariummoollf"...'‘171 .4A11,7,gm_ 'Ira ,.. ' '..:f-74111118WV-':: -'," 7.''-',..C.:-'-'--.':-14111,mis SP = SPRUCE in 15 . \D'WAY 4-• c4 b / ...____ _, ..:_--_-9-9-6-_WATER all ° io 6'' yATER _ — — 0 ____ ' * • : f'.9-- *1,1" • INSTALL WI = WILLOW 6-1 _I /o.,_, it a -t mi ___ OA-3 1 _ 1 101 PA EXISTING tr o P o A FLOW 0 INSTALL , TAPER X 2 IL 2300 IL 2200 PAVEMENT icr . / - -an .' 1 LINE Fl = 24'' CALIPER FIR M 0 o (TYP.) TL 2000 (MEASURED 4 FEET ABOVE GROUND LEVEL) V) I- 'cl ›, TAPER (N14 " 'N/o REMOVE EXISTING EXISTING '- / i ,ND 12" CULVERT V) 1- 4-• WATER INSTALL SANITARY -, • li < 0 HYDRANT SEWER STUB I _ 18.52'_ 20' WIDE HALF-STREET () INSTALL DOUBLE 1 4...A3-4; 5. )99' I , ,--8 IMPROVEMENT WATER METER 1$‘7 — fi-j----) EXISTING 'i 1 i ---- li (4) --I HOUSE . ,'1 1-- 10' WIDE R.O.W. DEDICATION (131,,-- / / TO REMAIN 1-,, ,' ,' \--6 z TI 6100 R _ EXISTING L4.1 R , I A- . - - --- . EDGE OF NN . I '--" -- -- • M —- ---ni ' 18. 2' ., 14-1 0 0 GRAVEL ...N N. (.2 CD DRIVEWAY ---I t• 0) uj * t - EXISTING W - le EXISTING HALF-STREET ., PROPOSED HALF-STREET No- W z 104 0)- -6:051.;.-_- - ,, - , i % cv „.; w 1 - IMPROVEMENT • cc; , I , / . ' .- _ , I %-1. Cs/ ''-' 1'± HIGH STONE WALL VARIES , < C\1• ■ .--- ....----.,• (Ng (SEE PLAN) >"' ce N ........./ {5).'------- .........• '„ i b c i c, 105'' ' N- , • C\1 VARIES I 30' . < ( EE KAM) 0 .< ...4 , 4J co 0 ,, --- , / a z -8' P.U.E. VARIES VARIES , 20' 10' 8 P.U.E:--- M < Cl- 4.5' n As-4 CLOTHES 4,0 \_.„ in •i 4144, I (SEE PtAN) (HUMBOLT •• II 9•: 0.. m io 2 SI 0 CREEK = 1 ELEV. T. P 5:i mAx ESTATES) 5:1 l'At1/4)( . 1,9 _ __ ,.,.. _ ,,, Nkl■t'' I— . . . . _ _ r1;:\ ‘•'.•7 • , „ ,, EXISTING LINES 7,. 41,4 4' HIGH '. CHAINLINK ., 4) EXISTING SIDEWALK 3" ASPHALT PAVEMENT (2 UFTS) „. _ -- -- — --- — — — — — -- _i FENCE (TYP.) 708_, „ 1 1 4 ‘'. IQ, 0 IL 6200 (HUMBOLT CREEK ESTATES) 2" 1.-0 LEVELING COURSE 4 SIDEWALK § 10- 11.-0 BASE ROCK ' . 2 , ,S11REET SECTION (TYP.) CURB AND GU I I IR ,to ,, ,, STD.-DWG. - IL 2400 / 0 0 . • _ .._ ___ i 2 . NOT TO SCALE tri , / . Zi. S.W. FONNER STREET , . • co \ HALF—STREET IMPROVEMENT F. --_-./„F1_36 j/iii/' CH-24 \/ , -2, SHED TO 1 ....1 c ,,1 --i F1-24 r 7 BE REMOVED fait • g _ - -- ■, ' - L _ „ ! - - - _ — — _ — _ — _ — /, A), --- / ic- .4. ITO 21 i Nve /..... ■ "Ae? \ 2i. 1 — _ = ..., — 11.111•111111 WO .11•1111 .... ..• not • 7 CONSULTING ENG1141171MS - - - - IIIIIIIINIIIIIMMI 1■111111, fiall USE PLANNERS LAS SUR VEYCRS N8746'00"E _....... 111•■•• 111111111111111•11r = ="r' I , 80.10' ...._.... -.....................- 233 S.E. WASHINGTON ST. HILLSBORO, OREGON 97123 848-4061 — GRAPHIC SCALE FAX:503 - 681-764.6 EMAIL IdchOs-z.net 30 0 15 30 60 120 JOEI NO.: .... 2297 WI IL 2600 ONG NO. ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 30 ft. • 11x17 PAPER SIZE, SCALE: 1"=60' cf,3 4 //1TL 1100 51._ 1 1 1 1 IL 6300 TL 1200 EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT (TYP.) FLOW SviT I NuGN LINE BEGINS 1 11 I I TL 5100 TL 5000 EXISTING MAILBOX (TYP.) _ I 2 s,,, _______ ______ _______3.,..,....„._ — 1 S8T461091Y 80.10 EXISTING CURB w I < .—.1 I, 0- .0 CO 1 18.5' ) l 18.5 i I 1 LEGEND SI *104.... ............... _ _103 NI+ • SOIL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER SOIL SEPERATION LINE ...— EXISTING 5' CONTOUR - EXISTING 1' CONTOUR DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION g A. i gi- r, cr) cc 6 Xf.,),&, :,-,0 ..._ .... . i c, • .,:,03 Li g _II _ a__ _ ____, , II TL 1300 ,os 1 1 - - - - -__ 1 —_ — ____ 9 4.41.:, — MP 1 g aPcia.. fr.......... ° ', EXISTING 5' WIDE i.LKWAY _ _, IIIIIIII8 -- — — — — -- — — 8_ Imo — — —...— lic..1.-- .7.-■.417-217■71::::;::::62p ... - 99 ST. s.._w..___,24 _ __ ____.......___. ______4_ 4 _ . _ . , — — — 98 of 0 SI+ 0 C `8. 100 1.-■•■"1".-- — — — I8- r — — -------\ • - `-3111111111i _ . I R-D.W''-i/EDtGAil(XV/<?.. — —_ — — — — — — — \DIVAY I oo. < & oft _ ____ 5::.,H,:1°-114 C,;';‘;. ',‘ t'V.,:.‘4,1 FLOW 'o..:0099 101 I -- 102 - 1- , ,•8 0 %.1 I i t:/ ' - 1 ''\ EXISTING - tJNE unury POLE-To- , ow.) 1 IL 2000 LI CX —_I 0,. CP W TL 2300 TL 2200 , - , P O I I BE RELOCATED I 0 103 M 15 Z , . I 20' NIDE , 701 M 0 W , HALF-STREET F.... > ,. .. . , IMPROVEMENT - - - I V) V) 0 I.... +0 i < 104 -- € )'' - -3 #-- 2 - - EXISTING 14.o 46111 < 0 m TO ' „/r-, ' v)u",‹ I I-/0 'too - - LXIGSETINOFG ., ,,.. I IL 6100 1 <2 105--... GRAVEL - • - ._ ', ' ■ , _ Li DRIVEWAY __ ,,. I ' \ 1•. i:`-j - - - - ••• , tit; _ _ I , 1 / , , __ 106 ..%11, , if % a) * EXISTING 1--- 103 , • QS - - i I ttet: 1.± HIGH • „,.CSI , 4-t. ... ,la csi 2 -- - STONE WALL_ _. ,N ob.% ....up / - - -- . _ •........amp de _— ____. „,—..._ Jo, . - ' % .-- ---. ' ,. R li.1 14 ray* Z ... _ _ B„, -- -G- - &ISTING G .8..'"..i............ , (A CLOTHES •% I /06,, ,, id LINES ••._ '' C1- I .. , 41 - ...J 1.... i-- —. 1 WUj •, o 1 lb Air , _L — — , ..... I...- EXISTING it , ‘, 45B w < v) , _ 4' HIGH CH AINUNK FENCE - - TL 6200 1 I 0 !Li i L.,... z I 1 (TYP.) , . 2 G No . , , , - 0 D , , , ' ? LL. I - - - - , , 1 i , G , \ , , , i TL 2400 lb _.........----z.-.-.... 1 EXISTING ,r. IrEEL-roovED , , _.....*— _ — _ , 1 11 — — aill■WO .111111111111•11, ANC 1 -, -' { * * 41) IC) \G... ''s ......„ ___ ____ _ _____ _ _ ._.,. _ _ _ _ ....... ..._. ..... .... _ - § .0 LO 40 ol ..r.- ............, ........., ,... dor , .............. ............, ...mi. a.... \ VIIMMee •■■ Z s NO/iNM =MI, \ MINIM IMMO, 40 1 \ "V NOTE: I ' „ z 1 OFF—SITE CONTOURS EXTRAPOLATED FROM , , , GRAPHIC SCALE of U.S.G.S. I I N8746'Ort ' 80.10 , : ! 40 o 20 40 80 T.. , 160 0) I ' , , : r4 C.1 . ; 1 , 1 E .;! , t ' ( IN FEET ) - - _____ / 1 , sill, 1 inch = 40 ft. TL 2600 ' - - / 11x17 PAPER SIZE, SCALE: 1"=80' o' o' ■5/\ . :..,::: CI % D E SI GN i IN „ GROUP 1 SOIL LEGEND CONSULTING ENGINEERS '--- SOIL TYPE , DESCRIPTION % SLOPE LIMITING FEATURES DEPTH TO SEASONAL/APPARENT WATER TABLE DEPTH TO BEDROCK DEPTH TO FRAGIPAN LAND USE PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS 233 S.E. WASHINGTON ST. 19LLSIIORO, OREGON 9'7123 45A 45A WOODBURN SILT LOAM 0-3% WATER _ _ 648-4061 FAX:503 - 681-7646 EL Idoh0e-z-net BNO - , 2-3 ft. PERCHED >60 in. NONE LISTED ... 45B WOODBURN SILT LOAM 3-7% EROSION 2-3 ft. PERCHED >60 in. NONE LISTED 2297 . DRAWING NO. 45D WOODBURN SILT LOAM 12-20% . EROSION 2-3 ft. PERCHED >60 in. NONE LISTED 0 1 3 SOURCE: SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE SOIL SURVEY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, JULY, 1982. OF 3 J. Routing Order: Surveyor: JRH Development Review Engineer BR FINAL PLAT REVIEW CHECKLIST • Plat Name: Passmore Partition Case Number(s): MLP2001-00014 Address/Location: 11370 SW Former Street 44 Contact name and phone: Cindy Halcumb, LDC Design, 858-4242 . (Ac,- CSC') Date Received: 2/28/02 Date Forwarded to City Surveyor: 3/6/02 SURVEY SECTION Check if Check if • Considered Okay 1. Street alignment and width, continuity E AM- 0 2. Curve, corner, cul-de-sac radii [ 4th 0 3. Dedication, vacation, easement conveyance d L/ 4. Residential Survey Certificate match the map ®/ d 5. Two Monument Ties to City GPS Comments: • • By: --To-To "'1 Ul . 7 -- 4 - 6Z Surveyor's Signatur- Date Page 1 of 1 itergWriv-deWormsta-pat.dot ReYSion date:1/1/01 Routing Order: 1. Current Planning: MS 4/ 2. Building Plans Examiner Daryl 3. Engineering Tech I ST 4. Development Review Engineer BR FINAL PLAT REVIEW CHECKLIST Plat Name: Passmore Partition Case Number(s): MLP 2001-00014 Date Received: 2/28/02 Date Forwarded to Current Planning: 3/6/02 Planner: Matt Scheidegger • Planning Division Check if Check if Considered Okay 1. Phase boundaries ❑ 2. Lot and/or tract size and configuration ❑ 3. . Lot numbers ❑ 4. Access restrictions, reserve strips ❑ 5. Condition of Approval Satisfied • _ ❑ 6. Public & Private streets (location, width, etc....,) ] ❑ 7. Preliminary Plat approval date - 1 yr period OK ❑ 8. Special Deed Restrictions (CC&R's) ❑ ❑ 9. Open Space (Deed or Dedication) ❑ ❑ 10.SPECIAL SETBACKS ARE Other Comments: By: ,#// P3 a6 az i a - - '77:7 re ate FORWARDED TO BUILDING DIVISION: 0 ate Page 1 of 3 i:1eng`priv deWormslfufgat.do1 Revision date:111/01 BUILDING DIVISION • Comments akc kir c/a L`'_.4 io'✓e goLd . /pine e l L g/Ze-L/ eg m61 By: '/ j►! II.• g Dept. Signature Date FORWARD TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (Attn.: Engineering Tech/Engineering Records) Date ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (Engineering Tech) Check if Okay Street Names Acceptable ❑ Assign Address(es) ❑ Address Fee : XL lots @ $30.00/lot = $ 39.00 ❑ Update City-wide maps ❑ Comments: • as By: d 31/�/�dZ Engineering ech's Signature Date FORWARDED TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ENGINEER Date Page 2 of 3 c\engNpev-aewomrslfir.gatAw Revision date:1/1/01 f1 .... ' • Returned to Surveyor for Correction- - BY: yr_ „AA DATE: 4 B4)2- $as(fo County Surveyor: "OK to review" BY: DATE: 1.(S'f oZ Corrections Reviewed and Approved BY: DATE: 41 kb�oz� Forwarded for City Signatures BY: • drr c c t P RAT- w', iuf-- s i P`"T DATE: L cm(i7Z_ Copy of Signed Plat Made and Put in File BY: DATE: Released to Developer for Recording BY: DATE: Authorize Eng. Tech Ito release addresses BY: DATE: Copy of Signed Plat to Permit Techs BY: DATE: Lognote: OK to take in building permit apps. BY: • DATE: • 1,', Page 3 of 3 i:1enplpriv-deWOirm n-plal.dot Revision date:1/1/01 After recording, return to: • City of Tigard — Records Division • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 • RESTRICTIVE COVENANT (FUTURE STREET IMPROVEMENTS) THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 1Z-- day of / 2002, by the City of Tigard, a AVIunicipal Corporation of Washington County, Oregon, ("CITY"), and / 1 ✓'% 2.L. /;,, , a eefperation authorized to do business in the State of Oregon, ("OWNER"): RECITALS WHEREAS OWNER is the Owner of record of Property covered by this Agreement-as shown in Section 1 below, and WHEREAS OWNER has received approval of a development on the Property from the CITY, as set forth in MLP 2001-00014 dated January 11, 2002, and WHEREAS Chapter 18.810 of the TMC (Tigard Municipal Code) contains certain conditions applicable to street improvements, and issuance of permits is conditioned on OWNER'S compliance with the TMC, and • WHEREAS OWNER wishes to mitigate the impacts of the proposed development, and WHEREAS parties wish to fulfill the requirements of Chapter 18.810. IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual promises, convenants and undertakings, and the issuance of a building permit in advance of OWNER constructing improvements required by the TMC, the parties agree as follows: Section 1: The real property subject to this Agreement is described as follows: Parcels 1 and 2 of Partition Plat No. , recorded as Document No. , Washington County, Oregon. OWNER agrees that the terms of this Agreement shall bind the OWNER as well as its heirs, successors in interest or assigns. Section 2: The improvements covered by this Agreement are as follows: SW Fonner Street Half-street improvement adjacent to the subject property to meet the City's minor collector standard. Restrictive Covenant (Future Street Improvements) Page 1 of 4 Revision date: 111101 • Section 3: This Agreement shall be in full force and effect from the date of its execution until the improvements referred to in Section 2 are constructed in accordance with CITY standards in effect at the time of construction. Section 4: CITY agrees that the improvements listed in Section 2 will only be required as a result of any one of the following events: (1) when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the formation of a Local Improvement District, (2) when the improvements are part of a larger public project to be financed or paid for in whole or in part by CITY or other public agency, (3) when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and involves the sharing of design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s) of property in addition to the property described in Section 1, or (4) when construction of the improvements are deemed to be appropriate by the City Engineer in conjunction with construction of improvements by others adjacent to the improvements described in Section 2. In addition to this Agreement, OWNER'S obligation to share design and/or construction expenses may arise by application of the Reimbursement District Ordinance; Chapter 13.09, TMC, or any similar ordinance or law providing a process whereby such expenses are distributed among benefited properties. Section 5: OWNER agrees to sign any and all waivers, petitions, consents and all other documents necessary to obtain the above listed applicable improvements under any improvement act or proceeding of the State of Oregon, Washington County, or the CITY as may be proposed or adopted and to waive all right to remonstrate against the improvements listed in Section 2 above, submitted either alone or in conjunction with other improvements described in Section 4, as may be proposed. OWNER agrees that in lieu of any other document, CITY may treat this Agreement as a waiver of remonstrance on behalf of the property described in Section 1 against formation of such a Local Improvement District. OWNER covenants and agrees that the improvements described in Section 2 will specially benefit OWNER'S property as described in Section 1. Section 6: If CITY decides to form a Local Improvement District as a mechanism for the installation of improvements listed in Section 2, then OWNER shall retain the right to protest only the amount or the manner of spreading the assessment, but not the formation of such district. Section 7: CITY acknowledges that OWNER'S execution and performance of the terms of this Agreement constitutes compliance with the requirements of TMC Chapter 18.810. Section 8: OWNER agrees that if CITY causes the improvements listed in Section 2 to be constructed, or part of such improvements without regard to the source of funds for such project, but not as part of a Local Improvement District, then CITY will charge to OWNER and OWNER will promptly pay OWNER'S share of the cost of such improvements. 'OWNER'S share will be determined by CITY in a manner similar to spreading the cost of a public improvement to specially benefited properties. The parties intend OWNER to share in the cost of improvements even though actual construction is undertaken and performed by some third party, so long as the improvements, listed in Section 2, are included within the project. Restrictive Covenant (Future Street Improvements) Page 2 of 4 Revision dale 1 1/01 • • (1) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (2) of this section, prior to construction of such improvements under this section, OWNER shall be provided not less than six (6) months written notice by first class mail that the project will be built. The notice shall advise OWNER that OWNER will share in the cost of such improvements and provide OWNER with an estimate of the total project cost as well as an estimate of OWNER'S share of the costs. Failure to provide this "six month" notice in advance of construction shall not nullify OWNER'S obligation to pay, but shall only extend the payment due date by the amount of time less than six months that notice was given, but not more than six months. Upon completion of improvements pursuant to this Section, CITY shall provide written notice to OWNER of OWNER'S share of the actual cost of the improvements and OWNER shall pay OWNER'S share within sixty (60) days. If OWNER's share of the cost of the improvements is $10,000 or more, the owner may elect to pay the City in 10 equal annual installments, with the first installment due within 60 days of the notice. The installment option shall be available only if the OWNER provides written notice and the first payment within 60 days of the notice. If the installment option is chosen, the unpaid amounts shall bear interest at the then legal rate of interest. Interest on overdue payments shall bear interest at the rate of one and one-half (1 '/2%) per month from the date the payment is due until paid. (2) Where the improvements listed in Section 2 are constructed by a third party, who seeks reimbursement in accordance with the Reimbursement District Ordinance, Chapter 13.09, TMC, or a similar ordinance, then the terms and procedures of the ordinances shall apply in lieu of the provisions in subsection (1) of this section. Section 9: At any time prior to the events listed in Section 4, OWNER or OWNER's successors may pay to the CITY an amount determined by the CITY to be OWNER's share of the anticipated cost of the future improvements. Payment under this section shall discharge all of OWNER's obligations under this Agreement. City shall use the funds received under this section solely to pay for the costs of the improvements. Section 10: CITY and OWNER intend that all terms of this Agreement shall be covenants, conditions, and restrictions running with the title to the property covered by this Agreement, and shall be binding upon parties to this Agreement, their heirs, executors, assigns, administrators, and successors and shall be construed to be a benefit and a burden upon the property described in Section 1. The parties agree the CITY may, for purposes of recovering the cost of improvements described in Section 2, levy an assessment against the property, described in Section 1, and may enforce payment of such assessment in the manner provided in ORS Chapter 223 or the general laws of the State of Oregon. Section 11: Promptly after its execution by the parties, this Agreement shall be recorded in the records of Washington County to provide public notice and especially notice to future owners of property, described in Section 1 of the conditions, covenants and restrictions against the title to the property imposed by this Agreement. Section 12: CITY may enforce the terms of this Agreement in any court of competent jurisdiction. In addition to any other legal remedies, OWNER'S failure or refusal to comply with this Agreement shall constitute a violation of the TMC and the rights, remedies, and penalties provided in the TMC may also be enforced. • Restrictive Covenant (Future Street Improvements) Page 3 of 4 Resesbn dace: 111/01 • Section 13: If suit or action is instituted to enforce a right guaranteed in this agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to, in addition to the statutory costs and disbursements, a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the trial and appellate courts respectively. Section 14: The parties agree that if any term of provision of this agreement is declared by a court to be illegal or in conflict with any law, the validity of the remaining terms and provisions shall not be affected, so long as this agreement continues to reflect the intent of the parties. The parties shall negotiate an equitable adjustment of this agreement so that the purposes of this agreement are effected. • OWNER(S): ``-- Si• - -ture Signature • 0//Ni-it A i7�V Name (Print or Type) Name (Print or Type) Title (Print or Type) Title (Print or Type) Acknowledgment of OWNER'S signature(s) must be notarized. Where the OWNER is a corporation, it has caused its name to be signed by resolution or official approval of its board of directors. STATE OF OREGON ) County of WQS I4 A7+o- ) On this (7 (day NA". c,� , o07•, before me a Notary Public, Q.- ('s \a, +t aJ personally appeared and acknowledged that the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act and deed. Before me: .P/��n— �-- :!` '- ' 0FRCU�SSnt,. Notary Public for Oregon . SHERMAN&CASPERS' � J A NOTARY -0'Y PUBUC oN �Gl f 3 2003 COMMISSION NO_.323409 My commission expires: MYCOMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 13,2003 1 oC'� Accepted on behalf of the City of Tigard this toff" day of _l 1"` , a. City Engineer NO CHANGE IN TAX STATEMENT • eocume„e Restrictive Covenant (Future Street Improvements) Page 4 of 4 Revision date: 111/01 MLP2OCI - OOC + IMAF'S ............... , E l i I I ___....... IL 6300 TL 1200 TL 5100 w I 0 INDEX OF DRAWINGS 2 5 ,„,,.), Ay i a. PAGE No. DRAWING TITLE v" '4' 1 1 of 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT 5 Av 4 v 4 2 of 3 PRELIMINARY UTILITY & GRADING v._ - _ - - - _ PLAN cr, = I .5 __ _ _ _ - ,c,, 1._ CP At V I ......0 CY) 1.- 3 of 3 ON-SITE ANALYSIS ac FUTURE STREET PLAN u) D) 2 so ch P IL 5000 -‘ I 18.5' 18.5' , 44 1.,.. tisi i o I •0 tkj 11... 8 co co N 37' 1 e I 1 d ev• ..... c n -1 a o _min ) . _ 4'-. Zii-..1,'-'4' ' 1.z. 11111111116 8 a. •--6 •• x(n 4) :A ,,,ile.4,, , cl:- , ilF5741:: ,rt • ,If mi. ;,,Ifsm,./1,r,,-..,-,,,....t.:..... ..e.,,,,,:16'113,," CT. „„,,%.,..,, ;:* .....r...,,,,...-, i . ' ,, klia A Au 7. .1 ,,,,,,44, .., 4t.; 5 (0 w c 5 ';.;7 ..e...:,,,,A I..,, ,a,•4',.. -L, _2,:,:..:.,,, 1:•., 4.0 0 v) 0 .E NORTh 1, F!!04WiF.:4: ?,sPc;...;"4",14 -tr.v.71i. ", 17 74/..,,,......'7.;7717, ::;17;741.,..,‘::...rt,; }s-`6.,I;i:..:.:,.::::::,::,,gri; i....7..:"i44. :al,,,..:,..,.: ...,,,::..,4:. ...::„...,;:z.,..,..,zz.,..,..::-....1,.... , ,,:..:,,,iiii,.. .,...i.,,,,,,,...i.tt....„.1,, ,. ,-;., .....,,::::,,.., i-..'.-,,,, -1,,....,:, '. ', T , ;-;- ' ituprii r ,,. .. -, , .,t-,:_• ,:',:F.4wQ,_,....44.:,, ,i13„.1 476: ,-.4;,' 141`• *•*-••.t - ' , e"_11_,.Nie,,, L-M,t, ‘.:4•=ti ; ...if!...,Ply 1 ___,---- 1 _ _ _ _ ______ - 09- ii.-„ 4.."42 ,,,. .iii.- , .-T'• :...... !'":...".''' ''"" :V.• lur' "'"7.4T:i.,11.':.' 4i 0._ ______ _____ _____ _____ 74,.. ,,r4REsio, - - ... ..,. _4"111,.,777,J:::',,....:5..:,.,,,,i:;;:it.;,:.:,-;,,p,r;ip,. -::,..e.a'.., ,m.:,..4 ik.74;:it:,,Vk*, ,. °' s. --;.': '''''''''.7"7:t1`-, 4Z...4.,i'4,'' „,,',',.1, . M:5'.,i:-:".2:f...,-...:,,14,.. ' ..: _L.__ _____ ,_. r. _____ _ _____ ____ i _______ ___. ____ _ ST. „ ,.. .,4,m,, :fr. , sit. 3E,pg., 4 A ..;..7;A , f f..:7::.. 41p,',;.7,7:,1,...: - i'._.tii:i:.3.1;.:i..,j,.."•;.:, 111::144:107V0 --- e, 1.,,,,,.. 11711,:::5<5.,7,'r,.:;..;i5VV.:,:112 , ---- FONNER ,4__ „P'.4'4 z _.1 j --4 :.,: ,,1190/.7,71:60 : ELa: V '' ' '' ': ' -- , '' ,,-,, * .■Isr",'4,* g SW i ,. ,i.::,..:, - . ':''''' ' ii: S:1•;*.:.."',:t‘-. '41-,N0 o C S.W• _ _ --,----- g..-- ----"\----- JE)---- - ---- ..L- --I- -4:1:1CP- - - - - . ',.,LTA ,...' Mili4 l E•47,M It ''''.:''-i• 4,11;... .'".' • ' :.., , .." • -:,i1.e . - * • . s\ ,, -v, .*.,, N- 1.6 1 i, . .‘ , , • .4. .5, •= le . 4.. - --------. __.i.... - ----_-__. *:!;...:7:17:11.0..,1:;zociLilin:::::: ,.X..11*144 ;y: ..: .S?. :::-.5 ::.„( ... 732.0--1;31: 1 7:1_11: 7y s,..00011."Lilli!,..7. ;.6 , ;v:r.:•:%:4' ::t .:,...::::::,..1,...:....1:: N gr" 80.10' :-I .11'CT f 4,'?', : -971111reliA S'T i 71.: .r.vi:ili:.;:.: ...,..b7.,-;.::,,,;,•::,t........:,.74:.:........ .7,...,.:::...."..,...,;,,:ii,..:,,,,,,_,... 0 Is :>:,::;:f 4a N 0 11.3.A.;<W . I- -9- • - - - - ----- - - -/ :,: :::.4, ' 0 0 ____ -- -- 406,,, . ....... - --- - - trs8L/7:04.>6../.„,°.5";1 ,I.CiZzOt) Z....„ M 0 '.. .7 15.02' ' 6 .. ' . . 1 * at is./: mA":0N-usli.m .:.... 1 -.A: ii.....,::: '1:..2.4.. ..,':,-1E' .miit..-.1..i.iyelV0V,‘„, t.„.,,' Nal - ' '''''.. 4 4 ; _ . .31( , x 0 . ••. .■ "c) IL 6100 TL 2000 .4( ,,..: ...„ ••,,.. , 10. -, ,//,s,.. ......... ,iii"........ ,..,.......PT. 0 IL 2300 TL 2200 •. •. • r: ,vie 7,508.81 sq.ft. :. ,...:„,..,..........;,:,.-.44:-, yll4AL00113"'uliqi :It: ;41',//0: ;-4;F.:34:411%7:1M: 11: .: ..l tria2...frill;111;11C:r Ili .: ,:.:.:;.i,54‘:';.1'.:::-.(t.,:eY ii: CL. / .. 1 5' I 18.52' ttfy.-.,,,.....- *,,,...:: ::',1 .• . ci..-:,,, :,..-E.: i ... ... -- 4' Z. * '''..) .YY..1;,701:.,:: ,:,,;:ii ....:,.... 4,,,‘ La lij' ' ' 4,1,-ric. ..'. ,*.r.:.:',1___?%.T.:,, • :,.4.,:.,.•. I." ...-;=. i4.: 1'' '.-...-,,i :- '-i;'' .1/ lye 1"„r - Id; •":.:ci iiiip ..4:4,,..,-, ''''...':',•.`r.',..;,,,,, :::"-, ''.'•`.•.:iii,;if".1.t...4:" '7:.- '-'RI , - :. ::,:;;;:. -., 4 i ,,. t 1„1„,,• . .:,,:,,,:., i VISUAL CLEARANCE --,,,---."k ,,Y.*:;.=4pitk„,1/4,::,,i s.7...%?,., , ,' ,..cm, .i•li'ii u'1,GT.:.;','::-.,NMI e ,.:;','..1:f.:..'4..F .-.1:*:;),?:"'''' ''' '11 a:. it::I C. ''''''''';': AREA (NO FENCE/WALL) 1 : : i,:',' ill LI j!J,:'';.: 1, #11Talii, al=t-CMENISPAIn, 9w°:,,..rtedar„,r:77,, „„,..„..„,,..--_,--.., EXISTING 4. 1-- C\I N Z WI' ...::,.i.,1..,4,-;:Vg,"`ir 71.11MITILi! TV-- l'•, t" mac!,:)t- „?;:',,,.;.11,::t.::!4,.: 11.',..;;;:,,,,'..V;';t- ::it,,,X .';',':'"!,".+J HOUSE co . - ri,!..V:L.;:vit eo,A;ti.14, '::;... .•..:., ,a ,i5ik, ,-lu. tati- a - v..s'w‘,: .77 ...;F:.)::,:,:t.;,?.3.7,..4,•Tpt.1,•••44, :',.4,4.1!: 4_,.',..;: -•,... 05 Cf) lij 3 i4NrAt,-*.v,.r.',.0,;.i,,,,,,, ic40.:10'4 f.• P`.:'-::1,4 ',"•4t. •• ••.-- . ,i,,, TO REMAIN 1 ../..5*, '-,,,,,,,i.,....-,i, -Av.,, g.;:zi ,,..7,. . :, ,;, . -.:,,,,,. .,4.. ,.;::. ,.,. ",aiig 7,■,, T Irol I ^ CO (,) , I 1 (:tr54'7'''.i'V'4'. k;‘,7:111S''.,:f::' " ... .; ..N:..::(4?-i,,, r..'.'.11 i',',,,, ,I,',, ,k, .-,,o , 11.-yr I 18.52' ,, &41 n 1 , ,,,„„,....,, ,,,.,,.AIL"z.:::.,,,4-ii:.:0".: Sil WE ,,,,, : '; . A. , ,,,, J.,,,,:'."1, t: .,41!;;;:pbr, ;;.!SW.4'1-.'.;'4,...alle%ts,.., -'1,. -,7.,;:,, 114,14 ) .4,,; 45 r .1. 1::*-4.4-- .si. ,., -, I ,,y,.."- '.: ,, Iv seg);,.;,:...,- ,ci.,',4 F..''.., ...%„...44.0;4.::., .ir 0 ..,,,,,,;Alza-7.fie.;-r i...-,,,,4.c.:,,.,*.,",....**,,, ..- • - 0, Li CO .-- 0 1 oat, i .',i,„:1,.,,,ik...=- ...i=,:',..)1,4 II 4,, . i t Jo .-i•;,*?.V 1,...,.:All .,:1->-iitALD.'wg.-r N a. . (Ni 6.05' I- T b Cs4 R§"'"''''';,;sr,,,-4,..'u_ur.,,f-t'",,,,:: . ' :,,,..,,,,,:, --, Ail., ;,3,,,::::,,,,,, t,,,,,,,,,,,„....,,,,,,,,...,--_,_ SCREENING & BUFFERING: 0 • N•T•S• z VICINFTY MAP SCALE. ..... MINIMUM 5' HIGH FENCE/ tri a 0 OFWAU. ALONG BOTH SIDES `4t• 0 5-Z FLAG POLE; VISUAL _ . 0 w ' - L.L.I . CLEARANCE AREA WILL LL.1 . W PI -3 BE MAINTAINED. * 14 1 0 t, , Q. • in 0 ,...., C) 33.. 53.12 0 (f) IMINIMINIIMP in ti I _ ___ .1.1 SITE DATA a Design 11, 2 TL 6200 I 5 _I cr) Nt- NET 8,023.25 aq.ft. <I. - .. 8- cNi GROSS 9,843.63 sq.ft. 05 OWNER/APPLICANT: HAMPTON H. ,m ALRL:TICN..PROFIT CO-TRUSTEE PLAN c:) m 944 SE SELLWOOD BLVD. 2 I PORTLAND, OREGON 97202 TL 2400 TELEPHONE: (503) 236-3895 . 1 ■:;%) o I F1ROPOSAL: 2-LOT PARTITION h s • '5 : ct /---EXISTING I EXISTING ZONING: R-4.5, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R 4 / SHED TO 3 - r •- -1-#' BE REMOVED -I SIZE: 0.42 ACRES TOPOGRAPHY: FIELD SURVEY BY L.D.C. p 1 L •__: - - - - - - - - :: „ • .7.:'•--- lifio176--- LEGAL . P ___. ____ - • CESCRIPTI ON: TAX LOT 2101, TAX MAP 2S 1 3AC i • A-t; Grou s _ _ _ .____--- CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON - - =---------7-7 -------==.-. '•*Trt:',."' ___________= ---- .=-. .ce NE37 46 OL/ c. =4: ,, ,si STORM: SANITARY SEWER: CITY OF TIGARD Planners -..... -,-.. _ 1•1111111■11•1111, IIMMIll••••■■ _ 4 ,-.7,/'1, 2 I 6 l'-' Engineers Surveyors _... 5 r ' =',..-_...---: WATER: CITY OF TIGARD 3300 N.W. 2111H TERRACE 7.-.--:-.. _......= I "" HILLSBORO, OREGON 97124 ELECTRIC: P.G.E. PHONE:(503) 6511-4242 I NOTE: G.T.E. FAX:(503) 645-5500 \.., i PARCELS 1 & 2 MEET GRAPHIC SCALE TELEPHONE: www.lckclesIgn.corn I BASIC SOLAR ACCESS 120 30 0 FIRE: TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE JOB NO.: _ _ REQUIREMENTS. 13 30 60 FIECEUED PLAWNG 2297 DRAINNO NO. , - ..... TL 2600 ( IN FEET ) V 1 3 2001 1. inch = 30 ft CITY OF TIGAF D OF 3 11x17 PAPER SIZE, SCALE: 1"=60' 2, 743 . 2-- ../ \..- MLP(200 i ar OW ki, .., I I I I I 4c .\ r .\ IL 6300 TL 1200 I IL 5100 4 w Ir.?) I 0‘'* 2 0 1.x LEGEND I .* 0_ ' _ ., ... I .+.%) 1,4' . ., • EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN 0 — — — — C _ I,- 4110 EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE TO REMAIN a. I —____ _____ _ ..,c IL 5000 0 /c V A I co • G EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED t I so I 6 to C4 4.• 2 co ......... ..-- ---,-- EXISTING 5' CONTOUR = I- c4 " ' , ? I 18.5' • 18.5' 1 0 s- 03N ,T, 1 ,t, I 3 ' I - ----1-9=3-—---- EXISTING 1' CONTOUR °- 0 co_r...01 csi • * EEDXIGSETI NoGF EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING . (nu' 1 x 19:0.; "g ....1 t. FLOW UNE MAILBOX CURB > IIIIMMIIIIIIIIIMINININO PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR a 6 0,8 2. e• PAVEMENT BEGINS (TYP.) ) ui 0 2 ... ....., 1—, — •— (TYP.) cx. -03 0 EXISTING ; .1111iw :213 ±cn PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR I EXISTING S8746'00"W UTILITY POLE f.......— I WATER METER 80.10 I 5 ___ ___ ___,__ T.,. ____ _ _ REMOVED — — -1---- --- ) I w v) — — IEEE A R VILLILa3.11 N I i 6 a) 0.. .1-6- __ ____,,._-_--_____, as ..411111111111111.1111,. ANY , Ar,..-„,„„.... g. , , ___I , — 1- ..._,-...... , -....._ - .9- I I x-ss ST. AP = APPLE AS = ASH _ _ _ _ ,---,..----------' ---1Q0... FONNER— s ____I x.....ss . _ • 4.0 . . -. ... x-S S ---- • • -,----- ■ ----- BI = BIRCH • — 0. — z Z — = CHERRY 0 —t DRIVEWAY • 1 98 Fl = .. - u _ , 1 ENTRANCE — — —.....--:----le DVAY 24" WATER HO = HOLLY ----- ...-- , A - % _ 6" WATER ____ _ OA = OAK S. le. :54-rE , _— — ja • - - - -iv -: II - c _ ....,,, a 24" WATER__ -_ 6 _ 24" WATER urig wig: .. iii.... ,., WATER ___,....i-----99 PI = PINE < CNI •"' -------24" WATER -61.VIPER tram MR ...... CL u) 15 11111111111re' li --#.. —(1) SP = SPRUCE L. — — — --- -ia csi - . \DIWAY I ir ;Is:.,,.r.^ ..' ■ 0 ret° _ — — -gib-- —I— WI = WILLOW Lii ....1 a. -- I .1k 1. ''...f I N•m70A-3 '- EXISTING a P _ io.. r r..- ....,::-,...: „ --r .e ■ ■ \ ■ - . -' Fl-24 = 24” CALIPER FIR m 0 0 TL 2300 TL 2200 , t,-......:,:t„..,. r.,;, / \\ , \o EXISTING (TYP.) TL 2 (MEASURED 4 FEET ABOVE GROUND LEVEL) 0 >, EXISTING .,) .,. . ••• 1.2* CULVERT <V) WATER INSTALL SANITARY A, ..:-...: ‘..-.--....::I 1— ......, HYDRANT SEWER STUB 52 0... ' '..,C0- .:1.*: ':.• 18. ' , INSTALL DOUBLE " ltg:;:: '$.1.fias.'1 / WATER METER i t LA los .,.---,**: t:;-;:" EXISTING // 10' WIDE R.O.W. DEDICATION 10.: ,...- HOUSE i NOTE: EXISTING DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE TO BE ....,..'%-....:.1p. /, TO REMAN 1-, -`,/-c8 z'-- IL 6100 EXISTING ••" 1 .... I/ I l 0.. IMPROVED PER CITY OF TIGARD. EDGE OF --- ,:;-:.= -—-I" h 18.82' auj . GRAVEL K .17..e-.. ..;:s; I , ,.. .„. ,,,, 0 DRIVEWAY 1.0 Z # t ‘ EXISTING 104 CI -fr.„.,.. 1 I % N (c; Lj j % N 11* HIGH 1 Es co ,9 : :Aise.,11. N ei < STONE WALL >-- N • N Ce 16 N V - -------, , .imr.,+ 105"' 34,/, ? I 71.---6 C■1 < Z Lu c0.- •ji k % DRIVEWAY a t 0 p < °- ..".........- 1MPROVEMEN TS 1, 0 „Y2 .9 ---- 1_EXISTING - 7e) In \ s4 CLONES /yo \\_, js IP 'r UNES c J0 D , (I) _ I _ _ EXISTING ,.. 4' HIGH N ‘ CHAINLINK \ o _1 FENCE (TYP.) /Oa_,... ., 1 / Ir. lc( 41) IL 6200 I 0 PN- NI sO) .s. , IV* Os°) .. I tx- eV'' .. • °CC) 0\1°)*S >. - 6 TL 2400 ,,,, 4), ° r 2 I i (8 . , , , . , -, , , , -\ • I 1 , \WCH-24 ), h ,,-EXISTING co \ *; .)..‘ I - I:2 SHED TO I°F1-36 /1 11/ )--...!-- 7 BE REMOVED ,-* • \n-24 -_ T., - —-__ , ..' - • ‘ .... - - - - - -- - ., - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - &1Aif2;'21 1()■it9 `4)\ 7Wilrl: etirOlUgn; rr --.:..---.7-' 'Imi.. .. — — =-,.--- = I ____=. ■■•10101. WO WINIIIIM "'""*"■ Planners - _, I =.-..- -- .-----: RECEIVED PLANNING Engineers N87'46'00"E • __ Surveyors 80./0' _ .. NOV 1 3 2001 3300 N.W. 211TH TERRACE HILLSBORO, OREGON 97124 PHONE:(503) 856-4242 _____I GR.tkPI-IIC SC ALE CITY Orr'TIGARD FAX:(503) 545-5500 www.Idodesign.com 30 0 15 30 80 120 JOB NO.: 2297 DRAWING NCL TL 2600 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 30 ft. - ., 11 x1 7 PAPER SIZE, SCALE: 1"=601 or 3 _ f M 1,4011)0 i "'IOW/4 _ TL 1200 + I TL 130 TL 110 0 _. 4 3 I 1300 11300 I LEGEND I I TL 5100 451".:?) I �� SOIL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER ° I 5 oo� I a. ,,,,„ , at I ci SOIL SEPERATION LINE . co ____ _____ ____ _____C4.— — — e- — .= f0�-- EXISTING 5' CONTOUR ° I •o le) �i cn aV31N TL 5000 . .P I , I c3 c°D° (4 ----' ----- EXISTING 1' CONTOUR "' v FM 0 1 )7r . M 3 EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING a =V) O I EDGE OF FLOW UNE MAILBOX CURB 5 w'U 5 PA A:�`HT BEGtNS I (TYP.) „�,, g °C I (T .) ��.�,�"W I DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION � � -c — IL 80.10 =� O g" I '—'"- ��__ � EXISTING 5. MADE � AY __ " , 1 .L �_ f :JQoWFONNEP -- S.W. " ' _ -- - 0 c -" 100 - -...- -- -- _ �_- -- �' �'� - '_.� !r-- _ �."` � �PNy O 11 E ti "' r O'NAY a_ Ct r- O 1i --- --- T �`, 1t - -- EXISTi1�G N ti 102- -- \ _ FLOW 1� W CT \ ,' \ EXIST1i._.. LINE J d TL 2200 11 UTILITY POLED __- (TYP.) TL 2000 r= w TL 2300 _______ __ ' ._�_ BE RELOCATED 0 x M ...4 p o \ �'� V1 I' v >, D 103- _' -. .� 20'HALF-STREET x I104-- E?a5T1NG �i \\ `r0.? a. \, EXISTING '(' , ^ , TO CAIN , TL 6100 \EDGE OF �, , � , , < -- GRAVEL. - i`, i % \_ ...1 i 105 DRIVEWAY - -• , W- __ VEW 1 t '^ ` _ EXISTING - 10.3 . \ I \ cO ° 1't MGN \\ __ , _ __ I-- - STONE WALL__ f, s. I Z ., -____ "-- - (I' CLOTHES ��''-- D.. ,„ '\ LINES `. s I S a w ______ Z \� `'macs Z O La '� Z • • EXISTING .-. \\ Er.45B.\ \ 4' NIGH \\ \ (n W .� CHAINUNI5 \-————` T L 6200 2 0 0 1 .__ FENCE - . I 2 €§ ,,, I i E I ..� / e t` \1 TL 2400 , Ewsrnvc ■ I -= ■ Cr I , ) BE oVED _ N \` ___ --\ RECEIVED PLANNING --- ---- ---- . _ ,� 1 2001 g■I P r I \ \ — I \`` CITY TARD l NOTE: 1 1 OFF—SITE CONTOURS EXTRAPOLATED FROM tor46v91. \, ; GRAPHIC SCALE U.S.G.S. I 1 80.10 i ; 40 0 20 4o eo 1e0 a I I 1 1 I 1 J • , 1 -1/` / ' , , 1 inch = 40 ft. TL 2600 -'" I �� �� 11x17 PAPER SIZE, SCALE 1"=80' ��. 4` 3 Design ,�., ,:„ Grou SOIL LEGEND Planners Engineers SOIL LIMITING DEPTH TO SEASONAL/APPARENT DEPTH TO DEPTH TO Surveyors TYPE DESCRIPTION % SLOPE FEATURES WATER TABLE BEDROCK FRAGIPAN o2 TERRACE . OREGON €,15-;\.y 1 � FAX:(503) 845-5500 45A WOODBURN SILT LOAM 0-3% OHL(5o3) eee-4242 WATER 2-3 ft. PERCHED >60 in. NONE LISTED wwM►'IdI9"``o"' 1 2297 45B WOODBURN SILT LOAM 3-7% EROSION 2-3 ft. PERCHED >60 in. NONE LISTED ol,,,,,w,,. : I 45D WOODBURN SILT LOAM 12-20% EROSION 2-3 ft. PERCHED >60 in. NONE LISTED 3 (, (6 I SOURCE: SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE SOIL SURVEY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, JULY, 1982. 1 3 MiAlgOet..000/4 po„..e 34 „' sir" kV/> C QLD T CREEK ESTATES I PAR TI TI CAN PLAT NO. .......11111111111POMINPIMI,INIIIMPOINIIIIIIIP �r 10,4 PARTITION PLAT NO. 199 7--Q8D 144W WA (111T /12)\ pr.) 144 RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO � � ,�87'41fi'OG"E 1�•17' �* - r•. „ _ A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF , s " *"W, S. . FONNE'R STREET SECTION 3, Nit), y © FD 1 1/2" ALUMINUM CAP -.,i . TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WM., INSCRI,IKD RM?ELL PLS ° CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON ! : is 1.5 7" f r a $ ,f31'8 I R. N O. 495) ° o w �.. (C. 1�R3T" (SET R2) i �"i § ;74e.,(4-5, g ,► 4,3' R 1 re;I g N FEBRUARY 18, 2002 ev 1 8748 0+0 E 397• ( ) 0 I -. 04-'`' ,+ I N87'4fi'00"E _ )74.10'(D1)�R_5)_.. _ _ .� - -- -----:*7-, ---; - �'�" LDC JOB NO. 2297 N87 1ç291Ej 317.33 21.06 94.04' (�'1) 24.0 ni -- -'a— -0487"41E—Si6.9101, 01.710-- 80.10$ *•,7 01 'PI N8746soose. . cii . I 8 OASIS OF liCARINGS 8746'00"E (R5) g esii I 1"0,20' i _ 94•p1' 125.93' 12.x.�'' .09' ZS 1" iRaNE. MELD STATE PLANE COORDINATE TIE *- a cv (E'ER RI Aldo R4) �, 10.00' I�Q�QI Tt tA, RIGHT WAY }EDI CA TIC +t CITY OF TI GARD G.P.S. STATION FD 1• y t ° .4 GC_022--•14fi TO GC_o22-147 t R I LD L�"" 0.21' 1;5.02' 65.07' 1N s/e' IRON Rao INSCRIBED 'HERTEL PLS N7?'43'11"E, 543.9fi' (GC_022) FROM, p Ia) R1 ( R4) 5/i" MR I ROD 1806" HELD (SET R1) N 7fi 21 20 E, 544.01 (MEASURED) 1E FD E 15'-WIDE PRIVATE VA TE 'HERTEL PLS CONVERSION SCALE FACTOR ' 1 (Zr R1) MEASURED TO GRID =- 0.999908 UTILITY do ACCESS MEASURED ANGLE TO GRID = 0171'51* ' $ EASEMENT TO BENEFIT PARCEL 1 . SEE GC_022 I. (SEE NOTE 2) w LEGEND: }7,4, 0 a„ • DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND AS NOTED. 15.02 ._.Q�j,7 DENOTES A 5/8" X 30" IR WITH A YELLOW PLASTIC W PA PARTI TI DN PLAT NO. 996 I �. �/"'��� �/ w CAP INSCRIBED "LDC DESIGN GROUP" SET. o) Cj IR DENOTES IRON ROD 123 8 y. 7' * IP DENOTES IRON PIPE I 4 0 SF DENOTES SQUARE FEET 4 K + WI YPC DENOTES WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP I 15 -WI DE�� cy 1 - F- 0/S DENOTES OFFSET ,, PRIVATE PARCEL w�,� �? UTILITY - WIRE �.j d � DOC. NO. DENOTES DOCUMENT NUMPER N: EASEMENT 1 FENCE 00++ ; rn tri CL DENOTES CENTERLINE Lo TO BENEFIT END 0.8' in `y (v (D 1) DATA FROM DEED DOC. NO. 2001026008 �, I""o. PARCEL 2 w EAST W `y i c N �W (NI (D2) DATA FROM DEED DOC. NO. 2001074955 O . W..�'V N (RI) DATA FROM PARTITION PLAT NO. 1996--063 i� �I ► R LLC C 'r�.. ',, O O Le) in© ° (R2) DATA FROM HUMBOLDT CREEK ESTATES $ ► FCNNE L W Neql . NO. 2001 07495 D�� ,-,� �-:k. ��_, ; ` •e � yLC � '4 � ���.,, (R3) DATA FROM PARTITION PUTT NO. 1997.0$0 44^1 1 14.1 ( t�9 :Mx* "i (R4) DATA FROM RECORD OF SURVEY NUMBER 27,287 .� �r �Ilb fix:. ��� -4' l'--:-� i - ;."") "b' l44 1 8 4 �" °'"` * (R5) DATA FROM RECORD OF SURVEY NUMBER 5576 Z ,. F A N N E R 'o W I R E -•-•.• WIRE W O O D S ; **,.., vi FENCE FENCE 0.3' 0.5' WEST PARCEL 2 EAST 9,975 SF • Ca 1 PARCEL 2 REGISTERED ' PROFESSIONAL 1 1 -- WIRE ' ND S /V Y■A R I FENCE r. / rm WIRE 0.2' +RE •N I FENCE FD 1" r pw�E I1v EAST CINDJULY A.1 1HALCUMB Q•4' INITIAL POINT CONE Imp ` 58928 Ls FVWX wap B EXPIRATION 06/30/03 IBS T PD 5,, "' NR w ► Lam, wi000 FOCI 411' o..r salmi kim arronz coma 94.01 , x M14 I .8' x (N89'43'51"W 94.0o')R1 PREPARED BY: GIANOLA 1'4,3'12"W LDC DESIGN GROUP, INC. 733.04' I N89'58'18"W 173.96' � ' DOC. NO. 98095081 (N89'53'W 174.0')D1, R5 3300 NW 211TH TERRACE 1 " rLLSBORO. OREGON9712.4 R S Cwt AT Top " ' DISK AT TOP F Q N N } ° : ' :Jl) ac_c -144 00_.022. 147 LOT LOT 5 SHEET 1 OF 2 f t e PARTITION PLAT NO. RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, W.M., CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON FEBRUARY 18, 2002 LDC JOB NO. 2297 * .SURV R'S CERTIFICATE: DECLARATION: CITY OF TI GARD APPROVALS: 1, CINDY A. HALCUM wimpy maw), NAT I HAW CORRECTLY SUM= KNOW ALL PEOPLE BY THEW PRESENTS TWAT HAMPTON PT, LLC, PROFIT SHARING AND MARRED W14 PROPER YS 11 LADS REPRESENTED ON NE PLAN, OWNER OF THE LAAE? REPRESENTED 0 N TWE AINNEXED MAP, AND NAIORE APPROVED THIS L DAY OF -1✓V) 2002 PAR81lt,Sl PLAT YAP t A POMPOM OF WSW 1/4 OF ME PARTK,IULARLY DEW, 'D NN NE ACCOMPANYING SURVEYOR'S t JRTIFTCA7E HAS CITY OF TIGARD CITY ENGINEER •7444110 or =Nom s, 1010194, a SOUTH, RANGE 1 MT, WM., OTY OF CAUSE TINE SANE TO SE SURVEYED AND PARTITIONED INTO THE PARCELS AS =UM 'V t ' MM3'1ato MI, STAN t, Qom„ si 011. AND DOES HERBY =SCAT E TO 11�E USE OF TIME SIC ALL STREETS AS OtAew■lt3 P r . ' a „ ' S�ta11111 M REt l4 AND SIT AU, EA,�ENEN7S AS SHORN OR NO HEIMEON. �'. P P. RdAT 45 lig *OM PoiNT t,f SAID SAW I HEW WE 5p" MN ROD Wad A 'M ,LOW PLAi'WC CAP ' ,AND 1Et 1" uIARIt#NG WE wimp coma Of " MM WOW. A PUT OF WOW NM ' /r IIMSNINSION COUNTY; PROM MIIWAL POINT, ALONG ME EAST ,e//a LIME & TWAT W AICT OF LAND =MD MI 1b F#R LLC. • • it MAR t Mai DOCUMENT AVOW DODON4001, SNP AND RECORDS, NSO4W4rE, AMOR PET To 1!g CONIMILINE or Silt POWER ST ET v se OF Pt,ATVI 1 c ,�; WASHINGTON COUNTY APPROVALS: *INCE ALON$ THE MT LNtE OF SAID PORTION PLAT, S00501111% ULM MET TO i I ST A'B'. REM ALSO A P�QIAIT APPROVED THIS DAY OF 2002 tN WE M or SAW "NNW W '; MINCE ALONG SAID UK WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYOR ma PEET TO idir MlEl PONT. CO M 440A Er BY:. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: R©F'ESSIOIVAL STATE OF OREGON r Af N Q R E �R COUNTY� � WASHINGTON ss ALL AXES, FEES, ASSESSMENTS OR OTHER CHARGES AS PROVIDED BY lORS 92.09-5 HAVE BEEN PAID AS OF. 2002 WIRIEftlirde Nis COWS TWAT ON TINS . _ DAY OF J-141 Tti /F DIRECTOR. DIVISION OF ASSESSMENT T •,.. A � �1 2002, ENT MID TAXATION JULY j 2000 FOIE ME A NOTARY PUDUC IN AND FOR SAID STATE AND COUNTY, PERSONALLY WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON CINDY J A1�MEA 'D CNARILES H. MARTINI. M140 i1EMIG FIRST DULY SWORN, DiID SAY THAT HE 15 THE CO-TRUSTEE OF HAMPTON PT, LLC, PROFIT 94ARSIG PLAN, AS NAMED IN 58928 LS THE FDREOpm 1NSYRI. N;'IT, AND DOES HERE9v AQ( OIM,EDtE SAID 1NSTR,MNENT BY:. . EXPIRATION 06/30/03 TO MS OF 1IS o FIEE ACT AND OED. DEPUTY i. --A ADRAT : ; r .: -1r.--- ...,....� NOTARY' T IE' PURPOSE OF 11115 SUR1iEY WAS TO PARTITION THAT TRACT OF LAND , t�'�`"s. r IN DEED 10 HAMPTON Pr, LLC, PROFIT S1^lA OG PUN, RECORDED W STATE OF OREGON DOCUMENT MINER 2601029001, WASHINGTON COUNTY TY ,DEED RECORDS. SS EXCEPTING TWAT PORTION DE's MN CEO TO S L. fib, RECOROW COUNTY OF WASHINGTON IN DOCUMENT MUMMER 95047947, SAE? DaD RECORDS, ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL I AND PAS. 2. PARTITION PLAT NO. 1 -01J. THE DESCRIPTION PER WO I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PART!T10N PLAT WAS RECEIVED DEED IN DQG MM:NT NUMBER 300002110041 FURTHER EXCEPTS THAT TRACT _ FOR RECORD ON THE DAY OF 2002 PAGE AR LANE0US S SMO COUNTY. AT O'CLOCK .__M., AND RECORDED IN THE COUNTY DESCH= IN NORM, MO IMS 114EREFOME THIS ENS 15 LOCATED IN A t,Nll FE .NT S'EC>1tal CLERK RECORDS. NOT SNOW W HEREON. THE 9i ALECT AND SURROUNDING ARTY AS DEFINED NN DIE sUB ECT NOTES: By; IN DEED (Dl) HEREON = ,,yam M�Wp W salty R 55 1. THIS PARTITION PLAT IS SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS (aF THE DEPUTY COUNTY CLERK IN l PARS T AS (84).T 1wg FOIE IRON PMTS SHOW ON GTY OF TIGARD CASE FILE NO. "11I.P 2001-0001e. PROINNE NE PNYSCAL E'WI NG' FOR TINS SUNMY, Alit (WOW ,� T WS ALA � �� � *TOT � fQf� �� � Z. THE PRIVATE UTILITY AND ACCESS EASEMENT OVER PARCEL 2 ' M LOCATION. SHALL DE RUIN TL Y MAINTAINED fi Y THE OWNERS OF PARCELS 1 AND Z. We SOU 1WIL Y MOT OF IRA Y UNE OF Shit MISER STREET WAS ESTAIUSIED ammo .o•• STATE OF OREGON SY AMR: 1 MAD 1" WIN IRE AT TIME NLaR1lNEAST CORNER OF PARTITION " ,R SS PLAT NO. 1IJ-00.3 AND THE FOUND 1" IRON PIPE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER COUNTY OF WASHINGTON OF THE ANwT I ER1Y TO lIME REST. AANG DC A� MERE BASED ON C I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS TRACING 1S A COPY CERTTFlED (R3) ALO NG TWINS U E Re COMMUNE' IVf,MILIAAENT AT S.W 113IN PLACE MS 11 TO ME, BY THE SURVEYOR OF THIS PARTITION PLAT, TO BE A FOUND AS LRO 'T MST RAFT ` ''''.." Y PROW WS LINE .D IN POSITION `EW """` "' TRUE AND EXACT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL, AND THAT IT WAS RECORDED ON THE _____ DAY OF ., 2002 AT O'CLOCK _M., AND RECORDED IN THE COUNTY CLERK ME REST LNANE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY MMS ESTA&ISHED BY HOLDING THE RECORDS. FOUND MDMINDIT SST IN SUMO, ) AT RC S uTui EST c oRNER. MD 11 REARING TO CIE 1" IRON PPE ISM NEAR T1�NE NORTHWEST C>t "IE NE BY: WAND OMAN M AS MN, ER MAW eV' PROM ME DE . DEPUTY COUNTY CLERK THE EAST LM OF 114E *micr MOON Os ESTASU,SfED BY HOE,pNIG AkIE ANOR1N-SOU1Nd /ANON OF 1NE rOUND 1" IRON PIPE NEAR DE SOUTHEAST CORM Ithlarig. MOH 1e MORRIENIND NORTIonT =ANE'1t OF PAL PARTITION RAT NONNI t 140-1111 MI CANT vow SA10 PLAT. (D1) AIR? (O PREPARED BY: ME SOWN um' OF DIE HE SUBJECT PaOPARTY WAS ESTABLISHED BY HOLDING 7HE LDC DESIGN GROUP, INC. MONUMENT AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER AS SET IN (R4) ARID THE CALCuLA TED NATION FOR THE St7UltoiEST CORNER OF SAID PARTITION PLAT (Ni). NS +.r —s-- 3300 NW 211TH TERRACE ENDEAVOR CLOSED 114 E MAST AS MIMED IN (DO *timid 0.15' OF D4 E DM HILLSBORO, OREGON 97124 moor (503) 858-4242 = SHEET 2 OF 2