Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
MLP2001-00009
Mt-P 200100 0O9 CITY OF TIGARD Community'Development Shaping A Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 11/6/2001 FILE NO.: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2001-00009 FILE TITLE: HAMPTON COURT PARTITION APPLICANT/ Matrix Development Corporation APPLICANT'S Tri-Angle, LLC OWNER: Contact: Jacki Herb REP.: Contact: Steve Roper 12755 SW 69th Avenue, Suite 100 . .11290 SW Blakeney Street Portland, OR 97223 Beaverton, OR 97008 PHONE/FAX: 503-620-8080 503-469-1213 REQUEST: Approval of a 2-lot Minor Land Partition of .42 acres in conjunction with a Lot Line Adjustment with the property directly to the North. The lot is to be developed with detached single-family homes. The lot sizes for this development would 6,577 and 11,656 square feet respectively. LOCATION: 8421 SW Ross Street; WCTM 2S112CB, Tax Lot 17800. The project is located on the north side of SW Ross Street and just east of SW Hall Boulevard. COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium-Density Residential. ZONE: R-7: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-7 zoning district is designed to accommodate attached single-family homes, detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet, and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks and subdivisions are also permitted outright. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters: 18.420, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, CRITERIA: 18.725, 18.730, 18.765, 18.775, 18.795, 18.810. CIT AREA: South CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ® TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: JULY 10, 2001 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: JULY 24, 2001 ❑HEARINGS OFFICER [MONJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 1:00 PM ['PLANNING COMMISSION IMONJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 1:30 PM ['CITY COUNCIL ITUESJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM Z STAFF DECISION [TENTATIVD DATE OF DECISION: AUGUST 2, 2001 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION ® VICINITY MAP ® LANDSCAPING PLAN ❑ ARBORIST REPORT O SITE PLAN ® UTILITY PLAN ❑ TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY • NARRATIVE ® GRADING PLANS ® OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby, Assistant Planner (503) 639-4171. Ext. 388 Receipt #: 27200200000000000071 �►N I- • T I D E M A K Date: 01/08/2002 COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Line Items: Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due MLP2001-00009 [EADDRE]Address Fee 100-0000-433070 $30.00 Paymen . Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Check MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORP. 0 24844 0 $30.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $30.00 nos CON. - 7 • • • (29,72o) RECORD OF SURVEY FOR PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENT o I LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF Et K) FOR 12, T. 2 S.. R. 1 W., W.M. J EN CITY OF TIGARD D ' WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON o A m O 5BRIEYEO: AUGUST 1.2001 Z • SCAL0: r-30• ci U LEGEND: �e _1 PAPA DOC.NU 98-0J0650 O - G✓uu1oD-C s l LI ATAVZ.WLc[or c[ssnc J I SOT 9-4-01 Q CAP YARNED YRS DE..NO• N89-2010'E 282.60' > -,9. ` )0 OB -• • liMFo- iw.END..ROO N.KLLM PIASDC•1 •S OI _ Va.M ...n'T - 0.07ES FOUND n7 PINPGry - 9 S.701Yr ; - Duoas NM P PE••%_ —STIR VACATION (800 N0 99-9151.9/9/0 - DENOTES IRON 900 .041 :m - _ DENerzs saga Ff. Q``(L•� / RN oaorzs SOME NUMBER � +1? i'-- pi \`_` Da ND- DENOTES DOCUMENT NuufER VI / `�„¢ j VIED - DDarzs IRA Yn.or nRSTk w 8^ 1HAM2RT ,1,0j/ .(N,d 1LO .0.£x6 / R'eN NARRATIVE: ' 1• PLAY BOOK 129 / a S� / 11E PURPOSE a.6 SURVEY MS 10 1.1..11 .D..ID PROPER IR _ - OO x N TN MOM MWE OF Ini ax a ixE PLAT of HAMPTON G� ` oti '�' D:D°0R1°I. ms9E501D'µ`�.s asmmo�x D°Ap°[OC".No • 9 ar1TD. 200010811 M.MORO(y s-10-01.WANO.E.COUNTY DEED RECORDS �°°58954'31•W"'gill C2 / �\ NORTH GsY LNE f SDI S BET[xm Ai A PL D ' Of N.M.C RR6911 RL.WOON 12. Sr ROSS STREET,PER THE PUi T T 29,PALL H.rA5nxc10N Caulr R.T / •9 All NoN TAnw WAS FOUND FOR LOT n AND IK SONMEaY -- (� .0WI w IRE PUT. RECORD BEARINGS AND MIANRS aR PLAT AS HAWla MOT,REM MUD I RECORD S VACATION A I D M. IS.SG INE Nom MMG ALSO TD O PORTION O M SOU.U E O 00C.NO 9Y0JS.0. REFERENCES ALAI Or N.171171... REOSICKD ` CONK w'111M PROFESSIONAL DOC.-0.71156 DOC 1 ,�//��//LAND SVRNEYOR CURVE YARN /,��El/ SURVEY PREPARED FOR: CURVE LENIN RAPDS DELTA ML*D ecAwxc II` OREGON MATRIX DEKLDPYENT CORP. RFFmIII$i ss sew"PW1Y 12755 SW.691/NE../100 x ��ylFL2®fATTSI O , FORWARD.OREGON 97223 WASHINGTON COUNTY C7 M INF579LSYTa6I149 . SURVEYOR'S OFFICE c• �� CI� 0J sarlrn r EOTRES 12-51-02 SURVEY PREPARED BY. 9-OS-0/ C&L LAND SURVEYING.INC. . 0116 S.W.NIMBUS AK. 0A7I RECEIVED BEA9ERTON.OREGON 97006 /0-23.0/ PRONE:503.541.0305 a nowt FRS:252671.067] AccnrzD 1 JOB 2252 1 f I' ICG�'S �RDITtO \ a y VS70 D. ilp • • 07/30/2001 13:19 FAX 5036847297 City of Tigard Ij001 • ********************* • *** TX REPORT *** ********************* TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO 3045 CONNECTION TEL 5032962068 SUBADDRESS CONNECTION ID • ST. TIME 07/30 13:12 USAGE T 07'39 PGS. SENT 18 RESULT OK CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - " 11± PLANNING DIVISION CITY 0VTIGARD 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD COMMUTI ty vealiment s TIGARD, OREGON 97223 ���A Community Tfa Jen P4ge4 cou6.ede es Sweet OD DATE: July 30, 2001 TO: Steve Roper PHONE: (503) FAX: (503) 296-2068 FROM: Patty Lunsford, Planning Secretary PHONE: (503) 639-4171 City'of Tigard FAX: (503) 684-7297 Community Development Dept. 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 • RE: MLP2001-00009 Notice of Decision • CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF Ti! I� PLANNING DIVISION TIGARD 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD Community Development TIGARD, OREGON 97223 s�iapingA�BetterCommunity - ELLF1 zemeen 4 Paged T t dudurg &vet S'eet DATE: July 30, 2001 TO: Steve Roper PHONE: (503) FAX: (503) 296-2068 FROM: Patty Lunsford, Planning Secretary PHONE: (503) 639-4171 City of Tigard FAX: (503) 684-7297 Community Development Dept. 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 RE: MLP2001-00009 Notice of Decision • • "'k 3 n- • - ,h ; Mw. `.fie v';•, -=>TYPEa�II DECISION NOTICE F rt ..i.,... .M. .. • .. .4 i. MINOR LAND:PARTITION-MLP 200 00009 k-; 'CITY _ �A OF TIG RD'" H AMPT N:COURT PARTITION 0 r Better om°uni• n8 120 DAYS = 11/06/2001 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: HAMPTON COURT PARTITION CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2001-00009 PROPOSAL: Approval of a 2-lot Minor Land Partition of .42 acres in conjunction with a Lot Line Adjustment with the property directly to the north. The lot is to be developed with detached single-family homes. The lot sizes for this development would be 6,577 and 11,656 square feet respectively. APPLICANT: Matrix Development Corp. 12755 SW 69 Ave. #100 Portland, OR 97223 OWNER: Same as Applicant. ZONING DESIGNATION: City of Tigard R-7 zoning district. The R-7 zoning district is designed to accommodate attached single-family homes, detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet, and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks and subdivisions are also permitted outright. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. LOCATION: - The project is located on the north side of SW Ross Street and just east of SW Hall Blvd.; WCTM 2S112CB, Tax Lot 17800. PROPOSED PARCEL 27: 6,577 Square Feet. PROPOSED PARCEL 28: 11,656 Square Feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.420, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.730, 18.765, 18.775, 18.795, 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION t"Director's desi'n;- s� - Notice:is`hereby giver that:the Cty;of:Tigad Corrimunitj%'Developnien g ee ha APPROVED'the ab•ve reuest subject-to certain conditions The findings <eonclusioris:onwh'ich ttie are noted MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 1 OF 17 • • • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOLLOWIN`G�CONDIT >B �.> :.t .fG IONS.SHALL ESATISFIED °-�:��� ;_,. - P ROYAL::` YF�THE�FI 'L-PLAT . rr . Submit the f l o lowing to the Planning Department (Brad IC(by .639-4T71 71T x 388) for review and approval: 1. The applicant shall provide a copy of a current survey map to the Planning Division for approval prior to final plat approval. 2. The applicant shall provide the City with a copy of the recorded shared access easement prior to final plat approval. 3. Should any of the trees on site be damaged or removed during site preparation or development of the lots, the trees shall be replaced. 4. The applicant shall submit a copy of the recorded Lot Line Adjustment from the Washington County Auditor's office prior to final plat approval. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 5. .A public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project to cover the half-street improvement work in SW Ross Street, as proposed by the applicant, and any.other work in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). 6. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 7. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Kit Church, Engineering). 8. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Division which indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of SW Ross Street, as they proposed on the preliminary plan. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a minor collector street from curb to centerline equal to 20 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5 foot concrete sidewalk; F. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements; MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 2 OF 17 • • • G. street striping; H. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; I. underground utilities; J. street signs (if applicable); K. driveway apron (if applicable); and • L. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Ross Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 9. The applicant shall provide a joint ingress/egress easement for Lots 27 and 28, as proposed on the preliminary plan. . 10. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. 11. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. C. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive a letter from the City Engineering Department indicating: 1) that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor, and 2) that the applicant has either completed any public improvements associated with the project, or has at least obtained the necessary public improvement permit from the City to complete the work. D. Once the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer's signature. F.�'_°_ �_�= - ,}THE`FOLLOWING_ ::CO.NDITIONS SHALL�BE.SATISFIED°._=-`• � �:� ER Tf .T 1 SUANGE:OF°BUILDING.'P �._ry .. . . .- ,- ... - ... . x. ,._n PRIGR...: O Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318)for review and approval: 12. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a mylar copy of the recorded final plat. 13. Prior to issuance of a building permit on either lot (27 or 28), the applicant shall complete the proposed public improvements in SW Ross Street, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 14. Prior to issuance of the building permit for Lots 27 and 28, the applicant shall pay the standard water quality fee per lot (fee amount will be the latest approved by CWS). MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 3 OF 17 • • 15. Prior to issuance of building permits for Lots 27 and 28, the Building Plans Examiner shall verify that the site plan for these lots show one joint driveway onto SW Ross Street, across from SW 84th Avenue. . ,' 'THIS/APPROVAL IS:VALID'IF: EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN-08r � �= . ,. .-.>_ .,,:. MONTHS.OF�TH - - E:'EFFECTIVE��DATE`- yF`THlS�DE Rl':� �j.:.>,.:...: ��.�. , SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Vicinity Information: The subject property is the undeveloped remaining lot (Lot 27) from the Hampton Court Subdivision (SUB98-00013). The property owner has an approval for a Lot Line Adjustment (MIS2001-00016) to increase the size of the lot between this parcel and the parcel directly to the north. The additional land enables the property to be divided. Property History: The parcel was formerly a portion of the Hampton Court Subdivision (Lot 27). Prior to that land use action, the land was vacant. Site Information and Proposal Description: The subject site is located just east of Hall Boulevard and north of Ross Street. The subject property is described as Lot 27 of the Hampton Court Subdivision and is approximately 18,233 square feet. The site is relatively flat with slopes ranging from 0 to 5%. There are no structures on the subject property. Both properties are expected to access Ross Street by utilizing a shared access at the east end of proposed lot 28. SECTION IV. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS No comments were received from the public during the comment period. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this decision are as follows: A. Land Partitions 18.420 (Land Partitions) B. Zoning Districts 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts) C. Specific Development Standards 18.705 Access, Egress & Circulation) 18.715 Density Computations) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.795 isual Clearance) 18.390 Impact Study Section 18.390.040) D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards) The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters: 18.720 (Design Compatibility), 18.725 (Environmental Performance Standards) 18.730 (Exceptions to Development Standards), 18.742 (Home Occupations), 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations , 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste & Recyclable Storage), 18.760 (Nonconforming Situations), 18.775 Sensitive Lands) 18.780 (Signs), 18.785 (Temporary Uses), 18.790 (Tree Removal), 18.797 (Water esource Overlay District) and 18.798 (Wireless Communication Facilities). These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 4 OF 17 • • SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION LAND PARTITIONS: CHAPTER 18.420 Future re-division: Section 18.420.020.D When partitioning tracts into large parcels, the director shall require that the parcels be of such size and shape to facilitate future re-partitioning of such parcels in accordance with the requirements of the zoning district and this title. The proposal involves the division of .42 acre into two lots. The lot sizes for this partition would be 6,577 and 11,656 square feet respectively. The minimum lot size for the district is 5,000 square feet and the abnormal shape of the larger lot and the location of the shared access precludes it from any future division within the zoning district. This criteria is satisfied. Approval Criteria: Section 18.420.050 The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; The proposed partition will comply with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations at the time of proposed development as demonstrated both by the analysis presented within this administrative decision and by this application and review process through compliance with the conditions of approval. Therefore, this criterion is met. There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal; Public facilities are discussed in detail later in this decision. Based on the analysis provided herein, staff finds that adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal. Therefore this criterion is met. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards; and The public facilities and proposed improvements are discussed and conditioned later in this decision. Improvements will be reviewed as part of the permit rocess and during construction, at which time the appropriate review authority, will insure that City and applicable agency standards are met. Based on the analysis in this decision, this criterion is met. All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below: The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. The minimum lot width requirement in the R-7 zoning district is 50 feet. The widths of the newly created lots are proposed to be 83.02 feet and 219.58 feet respectively. Both lots will exceed the minimum lot width standard of 50 feet. Therefore, this criterion is met. The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area. The minimum lot area requirement in the R-7 zoning district is 5,000 square feet. The proposed lots exceed the minimum lot sizes of the zone. There are no flag lots associated with this proposal. Therefore, this criterion is met. Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access easement. Lot 27 will have frontage along both Ross Street and Hall Boulevard, and Lot 28 will have over 99 feet of frontage on Ross Street. This standard has been met. MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 5 OF 17 • • Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. No development is proposed in conjunction with this application. All setbacks will be applied at the time of future development. This standard has been met. When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. Neither of the proposed lots fit the definition of flag lot. Therefore, this standard is met. A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. This standard does not apply to this proposal. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities. The Fire District has indicated that the lot will not conflict with its operations. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. The applicant has proposed a shared access easement to achieve this standard. Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress, and Circulation. This standard is addressed under Chapter 18.705 in this decision. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. There is no one-hundred-year floodplain associated with this site. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable. An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in accordance with Chapter 18.370, Variances and Adjustments. The applications for the partition and variance(s)/adjustment(s) will be processed concurrently. No variances or adjustments are requested or required with this application. Therefore, this standard is not applicable. FINDING: The proposal involves a shared access between the two lots, and access must be perpetually assured to all newly created lots. CONDITION: The applicant shall provide the City with a copy of the recorded shared access easement prior to final plat approval. MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 6 OF 17 • • Residential Zoning Districts 18.510: Development standards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2 below: TABLE 18.510.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES STANDARD- Minimum Lot Size -Detached unit 30,000 sq.ft. 20,000 sq.ft. 10,000 sq.ft. 7,500 sq.ft. 5,000 sq.ft. -Duplexes 10,000 sq.ft. 10,000 sq.ft. -Attached unit[1] 5,000 sq.ft. Average Minimum Lot Width -Detached unit lots 100 ft. 100 ft. 65 ft. 50 ft. 50 ft. -Duplex lots 90 ft. 90 ft. 50 ft. -Attached unit lots 40 ft. Maximum Lot Coverage - - - - 80%[2] Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 30 ft. 30 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 15 ft. -Side facing street on comer&through lots 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 15 ft. 10 ft. -Side yard 5 f 5 f 5ft. 5 f 5 f -Rear yard 25 ft. 25 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district 30 ft. -Distance between property line and front of garage 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. Maximum Height 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 35 ft. Minimum Landscape Requirement - - - - 20% [1]Single-family attached residential units permitted at one dwelling per lot with no more that five attached units in one grouping. [2]Lot coverage includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. A minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet is required for each lot. The proposed lot sizes meet this standard, however, the site size shall be confirmed through a current survey pnor to final plat approval. Setback and lot coverage standards will apply to future development of the sites. Section: 18.705 Access. Egress, and Circulation. Access, Egress and Circulation is partially addressed under Chapter 18.420 in this decision. In addition, the following provisions are applicable: Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.030 I shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. Curb cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N. Minimum access requirements for residential use. Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus by one of the following: a. A circular paved surface having a minimum turn radius measured from center point to outside edge of 35 feet; b. A hammerhead-configured, paved surface with each leg of the hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a minimum width of 20 feet;. c. The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is 5%. This standard does not apply to this proposal. Vehicle turnouts, (providing a minimum total driveway width of 24 feet for a distance of at least 30 feet), may be required so as to reduce the need for excessive vehicular backing motions in situations where two vehicles traveling in opposite directions meet on driveways in excess of 200 feet in length; The proposed driveway is approximately 120 feet. This criterion does not apply MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 7 OF 17 • • Where permitted, minimum width for driveway approaches to arterials or collector streets shall be no less than 20 feet so as to avoid traffic turning from the street having to wait for traffic exiting the site. Ross Street is designated a minor collector on the City of Tigard's comprehensive transportation map. The proposal indicates a 15-foot wide driveway approach. As such, the access that is proposed in this application is inadequate. To meet this standard, the applicant must increase the width of the access by 5 feet . FINDING: The proposed access does not meet the minimum requirement for access to a collector street. CONDITION: The applicant shall revise the access plan to ensure that the approach to Ross Street is a minimum of 20 feet in width. DENSITY COMPUTATIONS: CHAPTER 18.715. 18.715.020 Density Calculation Density calculations are addressed to insure that the creation of new lots, in this case, will not prohibit future development. Definition of net development area. Net development area, in acres, shall be determined by subtracting the following land area(s) from the gross acres, which is all of the land included in the legal description of the property to be developed: 1. All sensitive land areas: a. Land within the 100-year floodplain; b. Land or slopes exceeding 25%; c. Drainage ways; and d. Wetlands. 2. All land dedicated to the public for park purposes; 3. All land dedicated for public rights-of-way. When actual information is not available, the following formulas may be used: a. Single-family development: allocate 20% of gross acreage; b. Muli-family development: allocate 15% of gross acreage. 4. All land proposed for private streets; and 5. A lot of at least the size required by the applicable base zoning district, if an existing dwelling is to remain on the site. B. Calculating maximum number of residential units. To calculate the maximum number of residential- units per net acre, divide the number of square feet in the net acres by the minimum number of square feet required for each lot in the applicable zoning district. The maximum number of residential units that would be available to the site is three. This standard has been satisfied. C. Calculating minimum number of residential units. As required by Section 18.510.040, the minimum number of residential units per net acre shall be calculated by multiplying the maximum number of units determined in Subsection B above by 80% (0.8). The minimum number of residential units that the new lot can accommodate is two represented as 80% of the maximum. This standard has been satisfied. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING: CHAPTER: 18.745. MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 8 OF 17 • • Street trees: Section 18.745.040 Section 18.745.040.A.: All development projects fronting on a public street, private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040C. Street Trees on this site were installed at the time of the Hampton Court Subdivision, and the applicant has indicated that all street trees will remain intact. This criterion is satisfied. TREE REMOVAL: CHAPTER: 18.790 Tree Plan Requirement: Section 18.790.030 Tree lan required. A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. The applicant has indicated that none of the street trees would be removed during construction, and other than street trees, there are no other trees on site. The street trees were planted fairly recently. A plan for protection and removal from a certified arborist is not necessary. However, it should be noted that any trees that are damaged or removed during construction must be replaced, as they are a requirement for this proposal. CONDITION: Should any of the trees on site be damaged or removed during site preparation or development of the lot, the trees shall be replaced. VISUAL CLEARANCE AREAS: CHAPTER 18.795 Visual Clearance Requirements: Section 18.795.030 At corners. Except within the CBD zoning district a visual clearance area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to the intersection of two streets, a street and a railroad, or a driveway providing access to a public or private street. Obstructions prohibited. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. Additional topographical constraints. Where the crest of a hill or vertical curve conditions contribute to the obstruction of clear vision areas at a street or driveway intersection, hedges, plantings, fences, walls, wall structures and temporary permanent obstructions shall be further reduced in height or eliminated to comply with the intent of the required clear vision area. Computations: Section 18.795.040 Non-arterial streets. Non-arterial streets 24 feet or more in width. At all intersections of two non-arterial streets, a non-arterial street and a driveway, and a non-arterial street or driveway and railroad where at least one of the streets or driveways is 24 feet or more in width, a visual clearance area shall be a triangle formed by the right-of-way or property lines along such lots and a straight line joining the right-of-way or property line at points which are 30 feet distance from the intersection of the right-of-way line and measured along such lines. See Figure 18.795.1: • MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 9 OF 17 • • • FIGURE 18.795.1 ILLUSTRATIONS OF VISUAL CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS • f of Acit/ /°' $ ' Vii;.• g01 k 4°' ,1 • -eight of :,t" tdo 4-lYee.+ f-a* The applicant has identified visual clearance areas on the site. This criteria has been met and will be affirmed during plan review for building permits. D. IMPACT STUDY: Section 18.390.040.B.e Requires that the applicant shall include an impact study. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication of real property interest, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Rough Proportionality Analysis Based on a transportation impact study prepared for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development. Presently, the TIF for each residential trip that is generated is $226. According to the Washington County TIF ordinance, 32 percent of a projects impacts are met by its TIF assessment in Tigard. This leaves 68 percent unmitigated. The actual cost of system improvements per trip generated by new development on the Tigard street system can be determined by the following equation (Larson, Mackenzie Engineering, Dolan Findings, June 1995): $226 divided by .32 equals $725. ($226 is the residential use trip rate per trip TIF assessment according to the Washington County TIF ordinance). According to the ITE manual figures and the TIF ordinance, a single-family residential unit generates 10 average weekday trips per dwelling unit per day. As there are two dwelling units proposed, 20 trips are generated per day for this site. Less Mitigated Costs The applicant is required to improve an additional 5 feet of right-of-way along 79.77 feet of the projects frontage along Ross Street. At an approximate cost of $3 per square foot, this is valued at approximately $1,196.55. MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 10 OF 17 • • Estimate of unmitigated impacts Full Impact is equal to 20 daily trips x$725 = $14,500 Less TIF Assessment 20 daily trips x$226 = $4,520 Less Mitigated costs = $1,196.55 Equals the unmitigated Impact of$8,783.45 FINDING: Using the above cost factors, it can be determined that the unmitigated impacts of the development exceed the costs of the conditions imposed and, therefore, the conditions are roughly proportionate to the impacts sustained and thereby justified. E. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS: CHAPTER 18.810 Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a minor collector street to have a 60-foot right-of-way width and a 40-foot paved section. An arterial street should have a 90-foot right-of-way width and a variable paved width. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Ross Street, which is classified as a minor collector on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is 60 feet of ROW along this roadway, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. That ROW was dedicated as a part of the Hampton Court Subdivision. No further dedications are required. The final plat of the Hampton Court Subdivision also provided a ROW dedication on SW Hall Boulevard adjacent to this site of 45 feet from centerline. No additional dedications are required. Therefore, ODOT's comments, dated July 19, 2001, are not applicable. Both SW Ross Street and SW Hall Boulevard were fully improved as a part of the Hampton Court Subdivision. Again, ODOT's comments concerning SW Hall Boulevard, are not applicable. There is a portion of SW Ross Street along the frontage of the additional property, purchased by the applicant that is not fully improved. For this frontage, the applicant has proposed additional half-street improvements, including concrete sidewalk and a new driveway apron to serve the existing house on Tax Lot 900 (Schmidt). These improvements will need to be constructed prior to issuance of building permits on either lot. MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 11 OF 17 • • Driveway A ccess When this lot (Lot 27) was platted as a part of the Hampton Court Subdivision, the applicant was told that the only potential driveway for this lot would be across from SW 84th Avenue. The applicant's plan appropriately shows one driveway across from SW 84th Avenue that will serve as a joint driveway between the two lots. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030(F) states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de- sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. The area around this partition is fully developed and there are no other streets to extend. Cul-de-sacs: 18.810.030.K states that a cul-de-sac shall be no more than 200 feet long, shall not provide access to greater than 20 dwelling units, and shall only be used when environmental or topographical constraints, existing development pattern, or strict adherence to other standards in this code preclude street extension and through circulation: • All cul-de-sacs shall terminate with a turnaround. Use of turnaround configurations other than circular, shall be approved by the City Engineer; and • The length of the cul-de-sac shall be measured along the centerline of the roadway from the near side of the intersecting street to the farthest point of the cul-de-sac. • If a cul-de-sac is more than 300 feet long, a lighted direct pathway to an adjacent street may be required to be provided and dedicated to the City. There are no cul-de-sacs associated with this partition. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. The minimum lot width requirement in the R-7 zoning district is 50 feet. The widths of the newly created lots are proposed to be 83.02 feet and 219.58 feet respectively. The lot depths are 77.19 and 105.90 respectively. This standard has been satisfied. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15 foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. Lot 27 will have frontage along both Ross Street and Hall Boulevard, and Lot 28 will have over 99 feet of frontage on Ross Street. This standard has been met. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. By constructing the additional concrete sidewalk adjacent to the additional purchased frontage, as proposed by the applicant, this standard will be met. MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 12 OF 17 • • Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface .Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sewer main located in SW 84th Avenue that can adequately serve both lots. The applicant's plan shows they will tap the existing manhole in SW Ross Street and extend a 6- inch public sewer lateral, per CWS Design and Construction Standards. The work in SW Ross Street will require a permit from the Engineering Department. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). All upstream flows were adequately addressed as a part of the Hampton Court Subdivision. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 13 OF 17 • • The storm drainage system constructed as a part of the Hampton Court Subdivision was sized to accommodate the potential of the two lots. No additional downstream improvements are necessary. ODOT's comments to Staff, dated July 19, 2001, indicate they recommend the applicant provide a drainage plan to ODOT District 2A. Based upon the criteria in their letter, as to when an applicant would need to obtain a permit from ODOT, Staff does not recommend such a condition. The additional lot will not increase the impervious area of this site over 1,000 square meters. And the additional runoff from that additional lot will not exceed .05 cubic meters per second. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Hall Boulevard has an existing bikeway that fully constructed, therefore, no bikeway/pedestrian path is required at this location. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. Not applicable. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. Not applicable. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 14 OF 17 • • placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. This criterion was already addressed as a part of the Hampton Court Subdivision. No additional requirements are necessary. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: There is a 12-inch public water main adjacent to the ROW of SW Hall Boulevard that the applicant intends to tap for the services. The applicant will need to coordinate with the City's water division for these new services. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The Hampton Court Subdivision was approved for the fee in-lieu of water quality, as it was impractical to construct an onsite facility. The two lots will also be approved for the fee in-lieu. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final plat. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00 for the additional address. MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION • PAGE 15 OF 17 • • Survey Requirements The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Water Department has offered the following comment: • No objections—water service will be installed once meters have been purchased. City of Tigard Operations Department indicated the following: • Outside of the service area. City of Tigard Building Division reviewed the proposal and provided the following comment: • Fire Department shall approve access and fire hydrant location. City of Tigard Police Department reviewed the proposal but had no comment. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services was notified but did not comment. Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue finds that there will be no conflict with protection interests. Oregon Department of Transportation indicated that the project would need to address concerns on Hall Blvd. Theses concerns have been addressed in the conditions and comments from engineering. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 30, 2001 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 14, 2001 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. VA eal: ector's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule MLP2001-00009/1AMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 16 OF 17 • • and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 13, 2001 Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. July 30. 2001 PREPARED BY: Brad Kilb DATE Associate Planner July 30. 2001 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewer d rif DATE Planning Manager MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 17 OF 17 111L% -� ,�1.._ r _� MA CITY of TIGARD > � � OEOO aAFHIC INFOa MATION 6VBTEM +� id. : n. I1I„i`� VICINITY MAP lit t ♦9� ■ MINK Fir • I \ ( : 1 . lir/ �;,�MI MLP2001-00009 ito o .. II • • :`:"1. SHAMPTON COURT � . LA MANCHA ii„, \_` o r�iHH mg j PARTITION .REILI r NW „i tfete '. SITE poi I WEST I iiiiIiiiii . ,� `� ss �'1 SA77LER1 I ST Ii._'1 . S •. _,' / pl LANE .% "„— z% ihneFitins lir,' • R...� ■��. ' x,1111111111111 SIP GRAVENSTIEN LN ° , • ima...1•01.,- LAN z . ► •► : N ..II..�.�.�a 1�Hi1111111" ::; ii '111 l A BELLFLOWER 1 ,, 1111111. 8 ..>11.. i• ■1 N A SW PIPPEN LN �' ■ ■W - )W■ iII,I,pI '- -- 1- 111 =ll H = ==.,=,' r _ 0 200 400 800 Feet .■.■....ui ," á1IHHHHII W s • •of 1"=404 feet II 11111111111111111111 ii I A ■_�11H1 1111111i1II11 Dill . ���� iIill � City of Tigard ■: LET MLET IllililIl!! �,. : Information on this map Is for general location only and , should be verified vAth the Development Services Division. - 13gar,OH9l223 Tigard,OR 97223 "AM, ~. - .1' " ..`e0 ,I F a.- ..■..■i •- I, �""' ° ' ' . �`— Plot date:Jul 9,2001;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR Community Development I � 0 8 SHARED ACCESS/ SS EASEMENT i — 28280' —— __--i. �-- — `/— 83.02' —— — 219.58' 30' VISION , tbmss' PUBIJC tmuTY EASEMFa1T dFJIRANCE\ 224+00 I 1 8 — .__. LOT 28 r e� .0- ;,/(6' ;.•: _ . . m ; LOT 27 I 11,856 aq.ft. / �,,:" .., , + \ i. 6877 aq.ft. 10' ITE ,,./ •«• $ ,�' SI _ 35. VISION / OS «' CLEARANCE l • i( OT26 ) "I V• I V; 1 I.0 �� i RI•30.00' L.28.04' / LOT 21 R•170.00' if \ 1 22 +002 L�4,74 22�+00 0 •T *$ — LOT 25 \ - .••• LOT 1 ` x.• \\ �'.� _ ��/ LOT 23% ... . ....,\ A CITY of TIGARD T MLP2001.00009 CITY Of TIDARD --_ -_ - ____ a SITE PLAN N e HAMPTON COURT PARTITION (Map is not to scale) i • �.1:! %.t:., -�' j}:4 I.�": ..,11r t� -4. sl• i S. La„ .II. t,r vJ'1' ..1• L4: Yi 4`N 1 H. r ;cy 0, ICE�'O�F:TYPE'��I`D 1 K �41 t.. +..I',il�.,t.,r.,i t:.":.e•,r::'..71Ip x•.�`'itr,.iY.n..I;:-"4='''JI-V;Yit'L q,'."r�.;:;.ti.�,:..�:;."t;,,�Yy,d.,,!;(,�a�,I,•f i?�,.;,I_?".��;.,1t...;::.h-i1 f.-;ri 1d. 4Fi,,...,,-„ :i.•"'',.rr.,r F�M",,a.;r▪ ."'':�'y'�m• �'i'x�':�z',i,; P � "t::,i.r „.,1t-',�,.E"r,ii i,`"ai!a:"d''.:'�'' r•ts.I-;}'�..:•t'�4r i(" ,I�t i.tI 1 1 !b:-�.',r,�'� fi:: �m�F r' 1•0ie riaL°�'. ': � p�„ r;�ti « r N 0 iLANDP ART ITIONML 2001=00 1L .- '4 OF ;T HA PTO NiC'O.URT PARTITION� Q t UEttCr ommum :.r .r at,[:�::;II .,.:-n�FJSi e4%r,"6•."U'' ,.� � ','.a'. 120 DAYS = 11./06/2001 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY • FILE NAME: HAMPTON COURT PARTITION CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2001-00009 PROPOSAL: Approval of a 2-lot Minor Land Partition of .42 acres in conjunction with a Lot Line Adjustment with the property directly to the north. The lot is to be developed with detached single-family homes. The lot sizes for this development would be 6,577 and 11,656 square feet respectively. APPLICANT: Matrix Development Corp. 12755 SW 69th Avenue, Suite 100 Portland, OR 97223 OWNER: Same as Applicant. ZONING DESIGNATION: City of Tigard R-7 zoning district. The R-7 zoning district is designed to accommodate attached single-family homes, detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet, and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks and subdivisions are also permitted outright. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. LOCATION: The project is located on the North side of Ross Street and just East of SW Hall Blvd.; WCTM 2S112CB, Tax Lot 17800. PROPOSED PARCEL 27: 6,577 Square Feet. • PROPOSED PARCEL 28: 11,656 Square Feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.420, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.730, 18.765, 18.775, 18.795, 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION '3 ,.,.:...:,I. -,,,^.. ,'J'•U..�. .P, 'r J.' r',Y--: `,fir. -,.:.<x .. ,�"... '4:fi',r:i:''"5•i r° n.d.. �f� •:ar'i. al"'0 +'tYx. I• J.` k +f' Directors',.. ... =Notice"ishereb, iven;�ahat'�the Ci :`of.Ti ard:Communi Develo ment 1.v., • r • +'Y i1 AP VE�D''th 't`. .:Th" " in' d'esi nee��has, PROzi eques. and Which the'decision, s:basedtare`noted1in'therfdll(decision ,ravailable'at'`_Ci Halls f, f 1 T .di "�:i:i `a"ri;;]}... p. ,M,,;, r .,y.r x H t+ „. Ys.,.,.,'b^:i±d' ,}G'•i��:" i y ii tS''fi�ktiVyv„l ...: : ... .li �. ...... ✓t N .. "yH:' 'i I'u.r. -::�.., ..,,.I, u,.}'....:. .. .., h .IC.d� - .'1f , ,,, , „ ':lr.�; .1:: .IiW,' '�4• •l,.t N, , w.., T':f sH.�Iw, I Ae"u PP+h•ROVAL"IiSHA.!..L L B~,E, Vu•. A LIb FO 1 8'M'O NTH S'::��,.t'na•:'•:.r.l'.i ,�.p?i.',,o'n':7,".'CIii,•„,1, Il-!�i�",.. 'I4ut I :_...�_ FROMTHEEFFECTIVE DATE OF:THIS DEC f I ... _ N.. �'•�::...,„";!!i. •''�L� �• ..: • All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. • SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies • 0 6 Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 30, 2001 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 14, 2001 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. A eal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. I THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 13, 2001. uestions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Brad Kilby at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. s,-,� ����,1�.'�_ ow-„,,,IIII�`. VICINITY MAP . �� . ,-,O%■, ■ ■ems ILIUM uu.�\t,/ M. I .s tips-Mr Ij ; - .111 ,, MI.P200I.00009 s;■oo-�_ ////&O M EI i �,,r,EJ HAMPTON COURT ✓1111111 C��Ir11 PARTITION �y�111p Nfill MUM 1111 I .P_lUtpl iim■-■■ s ■i I : i■11/uiiU■ AIM Aar li 7— me II Ma �- ,Iri■■� s . ■■. awry. •%t � � �-- 1i:;■ 1111111111 bra `. 1 ■ A a� ■ ■ • : milk:luimiim. minis i ■� ■!� "■ i1'. 1m111111 1111411114011111 m"" •••■th• .. ! :I NINNIIIMMINI.A OA p I1111111p Cr -''III 1111111111111 M■■ . •■Mi WM // ..•Ele.us ir 1 p..■■■■■■w:. 111��,��1l':11„11n :: 111-.I ■=N■i■■■■,°■ III 111111`�i "..,„ p'.■■■■■.■r % 11111111111/r���` e : ■ i■i IIIIIIla11111111 m`'%� • :�"',• Cly of Tigard All 111111111111 = IL% 4.1 t 4 i _ •— . ACCESS/fl wagon aT µms_ - 3f� 0 - ��_ t-.�oo , M 3° °,—. .).4".°,—. .).4".11 .F._..._ i____ _I_______ 1 ______:___:..___„.. ..--_of ....- „....,,- --______r_ 4- � r LOT 27 1 VIM tt.eeT wn. /1an`� 0. /7,, �- --- ' e.en.an � t ” `` El 1 ,/ / LOT 20 3 at�n.nct � i ,�' LOT 26 \ "'j ao, airy �1a.11614,Od . R00' L.1e.01' / \ Its " "" LOT!1 22 Ooa L�1.7�' 911.00R�17Q00' �!� � �` L 1` 1 e - J ,ate C` LOT 4e �- tl \ +q LoT I 'O \ / • Lor .4. (QTY OF TIGARD T MLP2001 40099 SITE PLAN N HAMPTON COURT PARTITION (Map Is not to sale) NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOLOR,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION LAND PARTITION CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community • DATE OF NOTICE: July 10, 2001 FILE NUMBER: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2001-00009 FILE NAME: HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PROPOSAL: Approval of a 2-lot Minor Land Partition of .42 acres in conjunction with a Lot Line Adjustment with the property directly to the north. The lot is to be developed with detached single-family homes. The lot sizes for this development would 6,577 and 11,656 square feet respectively. ZONE: R-7: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-7 zoning district is designed to accommodate attached single-family homes, detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet, and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks and subdivisions are also permitted outright. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.420, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.730, 18.765, 18.775, 18.795, 18.810. LOCATION: 8421 SW Ross Street; WCTM 2S112CB, Tax Lot 17800. The project is located on the north side of SW Ross Street and just east of SW Hall Boulevard. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON JULY 24. 2001. All comments should be directed to Brad Kilby, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST 2. 2001. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: .• Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to addrese relevant approval criteria with*•efficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: • The application is accepted by the City • Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. . • The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. • City Staff issues a written decision. • - Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." Farr! Mp— CITY of TIGARO MINE wK.. ='■:..1.�9."_ ■ eaRl` •�,� ■ VICINITY MAP/11 IMMLIN ■ 1 EBROO ■ 1.11111 .0iit4 im,mq is ,l tri - I��� .. •-� � MLP2001-00009 r a I' '. ►l .mow "' HAMPTON COURT . iht ib, � o rj����� ��(� ��i PARTITION r' 'REIL NG I 411 L . 1'1/is u: b o`- II SAITLER ST \ O. ■ _r_:urn , 1 iii■■ ■o —�`■■■■:■ i�ii .i ,� s� 141 NNW ■r� s11■■■` WE :�III1111111 mow iI ■■■■■:Hari■■I■■■■; • ■■....”...u.■g■■■■ ■ -ii. ' ' - -■. fili i '. �, s > N A • SSW PpPEN LN - : 0== :=� •.. ■• :k 1..1 �I�ir wad -•—N-- . Ill .■� \ --•-1■ \ 0 200 400 600 FM 1111111 In ■ O% lummumi* a :,'......,,,.I. ,,,� "„Ili _� .._. City of Tigard ,''.,,,,- ,.I '.'` _ m__ .I.pNbwMJMN M...M.p....awk..Ol.l.lm. - - - U1356WN.IaNJ 1'�*!V4 •#0�, ..�6 l�� m:�� C1_ r oHns �NNa\/CNTI IGF I N -_ ppllw—idOpwtl.w.- 1 €JSEU6ST • 'R Qtvivi5 ,,,,,,,,-,' ��. o 11I1Iregon , J U` 2 O Department of 2001 iii- John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.,Governor - 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97209-4037 (503) 731-8200 • FAX(503) 731-8259 FILE CODE: July 19, 2001 PLA9-1-2A -141 ODOT Case No: 1175 City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Attn: Brad Kilby, Associate Planner Subject: MLP 2001-00009 Hampton Court Partition SW Hall Blvd and SW Ross St . Dear Mr. Kilby, We have reviewed the applicant's proposal to partition the subject lot into two for the future development of two-detached•single,family homes. The subject site is adjacent to :Hal(Blvd;-,,According.to;the Oregon highway Plan (1999)', 'SW Hall Blvd. is classified. as'a District Urban Highway. The posted-speed..in this_section is 40 miles per hour.-Based on this speed and classification, the access spacing standard is 500 ft. The mobility standard is .99 volume to capacity (v/c) ratio. ODOT has permitting authority for this facility2 and an. interest in ensuring that this proposed land use is compatible with its safe and efficient operation. We support the proposed access location for both parcels on SW Ross St. at the location across from SW 84th Ave. and as far from the intersection of SW Ross St. and SW Hall Blvd. as possible. This location minimizes the impact of the . proposed development to the highway. Access on SW Hall Blvd. would not meet ODOT access spacing standards and could present operational issues. We request the City include the following as conditions of the design review: . 1. The applicant shall improve the sidewalks along the site's SW Hall Blvd. frontage to ODOT/ADA standards. 2. The applicant shall dedicate right of way for SW Hall Blvd. according to the City's specifications. - _ . 1 The 1999 Oregon,Highway.Plan'is an element of the Oregon Transportation Plan,which was adopted by the Oregon Transportation Commission on March 18, 1999. - - ---- ' - ' 2 Oregon Administrative'Rule (OAR)734-051, see the following web site for the rule's exact-language: . http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/rules/OARS 700/OAR 734/734 051.html - - ' Form 734-1850(1/98) 'City of Tigard: MLP 2001-009, Hampton Court Partition • 2 ODOT RESPONSE 7/19/2001 3. An ODOT permit is required to perform all work in the highway right of way3. 4. An ODOT permit is required for connection to state highway drainage facilities. Connection will only be considered if the site's drainage naturally enters ODOT right of way4. The applicant should provide ODOT District 2A with a preliminary drainage plan that indicates any drainage impacts to the highway right of way. A drainage study prepared by an Oregon Registered Professional Engineer is usually required if: A. Total peak runoff entering the highway right of way is greater than .05 cubic meters per second; or B. The improvements create an increase of the impervious surface area greater than 1,000 square meters. Contact Ed Miller, ODOT District 2A Permit Specialist, at 503-229-5002 for assistance with the written permit application process. Thank you for coordinating with ODOT on this land use application. Please provide us with a copy of the Notice of Decision with Conditions of Approval. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, I can be reached at 503-731-8258. Sincerely, / '` /!, Marah Danielson Development Review Cc: Joel McCarroll, ODOT Jackie Herb, Applicant, Matrix Development Corp., 12755 SW 69th Ave. #100, Portland. OR 97223 3 OAR 734-055 a OAR 734-051 • • MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: July 26, 2001 TO: Brad Kilby, Associate Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: MLP 2001-00009, Hampton Court Partition Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: .,. Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development:and streets. adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street_or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a minor collector street to have a 60-foot right-of-way width and a 40-foot paved section. An arterial street should have a 90-foot right-of-way width and a variable paved width. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Ross Street, which is classified as a minor collector on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is 60 feet of ROW along this roadway, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. That ROW was dedicated as a part of the Hampton Court Subdivision. No further dedications are required. The final plat of the Hampton Court Subdivision also provided a ROW dedication on SW Hall Boulevard adjacent to this site of 45 feet from centerline. No additional dedications are required. Therefore, ODOT's comments, dated July 19, 2001, are not applicable. ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2001-00009 Hampton Court MLP PAGE 1 • • • Both SW Ross Street and SW Hall Boulevard were fully improved as a part of the Hampton Court Subdivision. Again, ODOT's comments concerning SW Hall Boulevard, are not applicable. There is a portion of SW Ross Street along the frontage of the additional property, purchased by the applicant that is not fully improved. For this frontage, the applicant has proposed additional half-street improvements, including concrete sidewalk and a new driveway apron to serve the existing house on Tax Lot 900 (Schmidt). These improvements will need to be constructed prior to issuance of building permits on either lot. Driveway Access When this lot (Lot 27) was platted as a part of the Hampton Court Subdivision, the applicant was told that the only potential driveway for this lot would be across from SW 84th Avenue. The applicant's plan appropriately shows one driveway across from SW 84th Avenue that will serve as a joint driveway between the two lots. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, . _ collector and local residential streets. By constructing the additional concrete:sidewalk adjacent to+the additional purchased frontage, as proposed by the applicant,this:standard will be met. Sanitary Sewers: . ,r Sewers Required:- Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sewer main located in SW 84th Avenue that can adequately serve both lots. The applicant's plan shows they will tap the existing manhole in SW Ross Street and extend a 6-inch public sewer lateral, per CWS Design and Construction Standards. The work in SW Ross Street will require a permit from the Engineering Department. ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2001-00009 Hampton Court MLP PAGE 2 • • Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). All upstream flows were adequately addressed as a part of the Hampton Court Subdivision. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is:anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional.runoff resulting.from . the development will overload an existing drainage facility;the Director;and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have V ;a::,•: ::. been:made for improvement of the potential=:c:onditionor until provisions .: . -have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by:the • development in accordance with the Design:and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management(aSadOpted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed'a':basin study of Fanno Creek -and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that : :,;..,; plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The storm drainage system constructed as a part of the Hampton Court Subdivision was sized to accommodate the potential of the two lots. No additional downstream improvements are necessary. ODOT's comments to Staff, dated July 19, 2001, indicate they recommend the applicant provide a drainage plan to ODOT District 2A. Based upon the criteria in their letter, as to when an applicant would need to obtain a permit from ODOT, ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2001-00009 Hampton Court MLP PAGE 3 • • Staff does not recommend such a condition. The additional lot will not increase the impervious area of this site over 1,000 square meters. And the additional runoff from that additional lot will not exceed .05 cubic meters per second. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. _ Minimum Width: -Section 18:810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within..the roadway is five-feet per bicycle travel lane: Minimum•: A: •, . width for two way bikeways.separated*from the road is eight feet. . :.� • • Utilities: • Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those - required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 20b1-00009 Hampton Court MLP PAGE 4 • • • • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. This criterion was already addressed as a part of the Hampton Court Subdivision. No additional requirements are necessary. • ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND • ' UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: There is a 12-inch public water main adjacent to the ROW of SW Hall Boulevard that the applicant intends to tap for the services. The applicant Will need to coordinate with the City's water division for these new services. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2001-00009 Hampton Court MLP PAGE 5 • The Hampton Court Subdivision was approved for the fee in-lieu of water quality, as it was impractical to construct an onsite facility. The two lots will also be approved for the fee in-lieu. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addressesfor parcels within the ..,.;.. = City:of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary'(USB): An addressing fee _ ~' in the amount of$ 30.00'per address shall be assessed:= --This.fee shall be paid to ;.'.: the City prior to approval of the final plat. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00 for the additional address. Survey Requirements The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. * Recommendations: ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2001-00009 Hampton Court MLP PAGE 6 • • THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: A public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project to cover the half-street improvement work in SW Ross Street, as proposed by the applicant, and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC,. etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact;:person.. to provide: ,:accurate • information to the Engineering Department will delay..processing of project • documents. .. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Kit Church, Engineering). .. ; The applicant shall submit construction: plans to the Engineering Division which indicate that they will construct a,half-street improvement along the frontage of SW Ross Street, as they proposed on the preliminary plan. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a minor collector street from curb to centerline equal to 20 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5 foot concrete sidewalk; F. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2001-00009 Hampton Court MLP PAGE 7 • • • I. underground utilities; J. street signs (if applicable); K. driveway apron (if applicable); and L. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Ross Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. The applicant shall provide a joint ingress/egress easement for Lots 27 and 28, as proposed on the preliminary plan. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: • • - A. • Submit for City-review four(4) paper copies of the final plat prepared, by a land surveyor'licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary Aata-.or. narrative. B. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum , standards set forth°'by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS':92:05); Washington County, arid"by the City of Tigard. C. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive a letter from the City Engineering Department indicating:. 1) that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor, and 2) that the applicant has either completed any public improvements associated with the project, or has at least obtained the necessary public improvement permit from the City to complete the work. D. Once the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer's signature. ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2001-00009 Hampton Court MLP PAGE 8 • • • THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a mylar copy of the recorded final plat. Prior to issuance of a building permit on either lot (27 or 28), the applicant shall complete the proposed public improvements in SW Ross Street, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. Prior to issuance of the building permit for Lots 27 and 28, the applicant shall pay the standard water quality fee per lot (fee amount will be the latest approved by CWS). Prior to issuance of building permits for Lots 27 and 28, the Building Plans Examiner shall verify that the site plan for these lots show one joint driveway • onto SW Ross Street, across from SW 84th Avenue. itengthrianr\comments mIp'mIp2001-00009.doc • • ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2001-00009 Hampton Court MLP PAGE 9 • REQUEST FOR COMERS CITY TIGARD Community Devetopment Shaping A Better Community DATE: duly 10,2001 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Dennis Koellermeier,Operations Manager JUL 2 3 2001 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby,Associate Planner[x 3881 Phone: [5031639-4171/Fax: [5031684-1291 MINOR LAND PARTITION(MLR 2001-00009 ➢ HAMPTON COURT PARTITION REQUEST: Approval of a 2-lot Minor Land Partition of .42 acres in conjunction with a Lot Line Adjustment with the property directly to the North. The lot is to be developed with detached single-family homes. The lot sizes for this development would 6,577 and 11,656 square feet respectively. LOCATION: 8421 SW Ross Street; WCTM 2S112CB, Tax Lot 17800. The project is located on the north side of SW Ross Street and just east of SW Hall Boulevard. COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium-Density Residential. ZONE: R-7: Medium- Density Residential District. The R-7 zoning district is designed to accommodate attached single-family homes, detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet, and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks and subdivisions are.also permitted outright. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.420, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.730, 18.765, 18.775, 18.795, 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 24. 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: c=*03 Q x..141 x.11 keis,kt t4 opt¢ I II - OR - 4.444-1 -tea 7 t %-1AQf. h/� �� 3 ` � y�� / /iq/off Ark; — Did ems- /26/ 7�irAi (Please provide the follinving information)Name of Persons)Commenting: I Phone Numberis): Bradley Kilby- Hampton Court Partitionc Page 1 TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE • SOUTH DIVISION COMMUNITY SERVICES • OPERATIONS • FIRE PREVENTION July 20,2001 Brad Kilby,Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 Re: Hampton Court Partition Dear Brad, I have reviewed the submittal for the above named project and find no conflicts with our interests. Please contact me at(503)612-7010 with any additional questions. Sincerely, ,. mi, Eric T. McMullen Deputy Fire Marshal 7401 SW Washo Court,Suite 101•Tualatin,Oregon Sr 22•oTel.(503)612-7000•Fax(503)612-7003•www.tvfr.com • • MEMORANDUM Aolimulo$1■0\ TO: Brad Kilby FROM: Matt Stine RE: Hampton Court Partition DATE: July 17, 2001 18.790.30.1 Tree Plan Requirement A. Tree plan required. A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel, or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. The applicant must follow all provisions described in 18.790.30. 1. The applicant must follow, the above guidelines since it is stated on Page 12 that six (6) trees will be retained and protected onsite. A full arborist report is required. • • r , • • Ai REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development SFiapingA Better Community DATE: July 10,2001 TO: Gary Lampella,Building Official RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division JUL 11 2001 STAFF CONTACT: Brad Ifilby,Associate Planner lx 3881 CITY OF TIGARD Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 MINOR LAND PARTITION(MLPI 2001-00009 > HAMPTON COURT PARTITION < REQUEST: Approval of a 2-lot Minor Land Partition of.42 acres in conjunction with a Lot Line Adjustment with the property directly to the North. The lot is to be developed with detached single-family homes. The lot sizes for this development would 6,577 and 11,656 square feet respectively. LOCATION: 8421 SW Ross Street; WCTM 2S112CB, Tax Lot 17800. The project is located on the north side of SW Ross Street and just east of SW Hall Boulevard. COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium-Density Residential. ZONE: R-7: Medium- Density Residential District. The R-7 zoning district is designed to accommodate attached single-family homes, detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet, and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks and subdivisions are also permitted outright. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.420, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.730, 18.765, 18.775, 18.795, 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 24. 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: gtd vds 7"OPi - Ss D e.bc Alopo.adetrc, I(Please provide the follawing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: i f 5 z, I I Phone Number[sl: -771 2 I r 1 • • - REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF IGARD Community cDeve(opment Shaping Better Community DATE: July 10,2001 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Brad'Why,Associate Planner[x 388) JUL 1 2 2001 Phone: 15031639-4111/Fax: 1503)684-1291 CITY OF TtGARD MINOR LAND PARTITION IMLPI 2001-00009 ➢ HAMPTON COURT PARTITION Q REQUEST: Approval of a 2-lot Minor Land Partition of.42 acres in conjunction with a Lot Line Adjustment with the property directly to the North. The lot is to be developed with detached single-family homes. The lot sizes for this development would 6,577 and 11,656 square feet respectively. LOCATION: 8421 SW Ross Street; WCTM 2S112CB, Tax Lot 17800. The project is located on the north side of SW Ross Street and just east of SW Hall Boulevard. COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium-Density Residential. ZONE: R-7: Medium- Density Residential District. The R-7 zoning district is designed to accommodate attached single-family homes, detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet, and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks and subdivisions are also permitted outright. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.420, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.730, 18.765, 18.775, 18.795, 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 24. 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the folliyuring information)Name of Personfsl Commenting: & .W®l k I Phone Number's): I • • _,t, REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI O IGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: July 10,2001 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Brad ION,Associate Planner Ix 3881 Phone: 1503)639-4171/Fax: 15031684-1291 MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLR 2001-00009 ➢ HAMPTON COURT PARTITION Q REQUEST: Approval of a 2-lot Minor Land Partition of .42 acres in conjunction with a Lot Line Adjustment with the property directly to the North. The lot is to be developed with detached single-family homes. The lot sizes for this development would 6,577 and 11,656 square feet respectively. LOCATION: 8421 SW Ross Street; WCTM 2S112CB, Tax Lot 17800. The project is located on the north side of SW Ross Street and just east of SW Hall Boulevard. COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium-Density Residential. ZONE: R-7: Medium- Density Residential District. The R-7 zoning district is designed to accommodate attached single-family homes, detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet, and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks and subdivisions are also permitted outright. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.420, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.730, 18.765, 18.775, 18.795, 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 24. 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provufe the foanving information)Name of Personfsl Commenting: I Phone Humberto): I CITY . TIGARD REQUEST FOR CONNTS rr N•TIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: - 10( -MOD.et FILE NAME: tirgrniand ('!'J )TT Ib1L.P ,'{'. :CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT:TEAMS 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: DCentral ❑East ,outh DWest OProposal Descrip.in Library CIT Book zsL. `` CITY'OFFICESt $. LONG RANGE PLANNING/Nadine Smith,Supervisor _COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPTJPIanning-Engineering Techs. 4OLICE DEPTJJim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer _BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official ENGINEERING DEPTJBrian Rager,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer JmATER DEPTJDennis Koellermeier,Operations Mgr. CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder PUBLIC WORKS/John Roy,Property Manager PUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester ✓PLANNER—TIME TO POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBUC HEARING ITEM! SPECIAL DISTRICTS ''=..: :::::.' '-j _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.* AUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* 4EANWATER SERVICES+1r Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 fLOCAL AND S. ... . .JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON* _ CITY OF TUALATIN* _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street NE _ Irish Bunnell,Development Services PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97301-1279 PO Box 4755- Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING* OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE _ CITY OF DURHAM* 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ Carol Hall,Data Resource Center(ZCA) _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue _ Mel Huie,Greenspaces coordinator(CPA/ZDA) Larry French(comp.Plan Amendments only) PO Box 2946 _CITY OF KING CITY* _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _ C.D.Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 15300 SW 116th Avenue WASHINGTON COUNTY King City,OR 97224 _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powerlines in Area) _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO* Routing TTRC–Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Planning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 _Brent Curtis(CPA) . Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion(CPA) _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * Anne LaMountain(IGA/URB) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) jeSonya Kazen,Development Review Coordinator hil Healy(iGAAJRB) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir. Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) teve Conway(General AppS.) Portland Building 106,Rm.1002 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Sr.Cartographer icPA/ZCAir S,. 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Jim Nims(zcA)MS 15 Portland,OR 97204 _Doria Mateja(ma)Ms 14 —ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A Jane Estes,Permit Specialist 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Portland,OR 97221-2414 -�- .- , - h flLITY�PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northem/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W.10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Pat McGann (If Project is Within'A Mile of A Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street eaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 VPORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRICW NATURAL GAS COMPANY _VERIZON — QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Jim VanKleek,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Richard Jackson,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _TCI CABLE(Apps.Eel Manm.of99W) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Menlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street , Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Portland,OR 97232 * INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h:\pattyVmasters\Request For Comments Notification List 2.doc (Revised: 5-Jul-01) P4NiNG Sciy /HATERb4 LS , 47 • • A A FFIDAVIT OF MAILING A'''� CITY OF TIGARD Community Development SiapingA Better Community I, cPatricia L. Lunsfoni being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the city ofTigar , Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Ched(Appopnate Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: MLP200I-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION El AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit'B",and by reference made a part hereof, on luly 30,2001, and deposited in the United States Mail on lUIi 30,2001, postage prepaid. — ' SO1 „,;...,._:_/.41 ,,,A__ ____‘__ _A (Person that Pr-•ar;'oti •• STATE OF OKRTGOX ) County of`Was ington )ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 3 day of , 2001. • :z`ti OFFICIAL SEAL "''.-,, DIANE M JELDERKS ill"'� NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON "' COMMISSION NO.326578 ∎ L`1i. 1 SAL` MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 ' 1 ,l' I ' 1 : . I I ' _l' My Commission Exp s: 7/7 . 1_3 • EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION A,. MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP)2001-00009 .0 112 CITY OF TIGARD HAMPTON COURT PARTITION Community Community Shaping A Bett erommunity 120 DAYS = 11/06/2001 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: HAMPTON COURT PARTITION CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2001-00009 PROPOSAL: Approval of a 2-lot Minor Land Partition of .42 acres in conjunction with a Lot Line Adjustment with the property directly to the north. The lot is to be developed with detached single-family homes. The lot sizes for this development would be 6,577 and 11,656 square feet respectively. APPLICANT: Matrix Development Corp. 12755 SW 69 Ave. #100 Portland, OR 97223 OWNER: Same as Applicant. ZONING DESIGNATION: City of Tigard R-7 zoning district. The R-7 zoning district is designed to accommodate attached single-family homes, detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet, and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks and subdivisions are also permitted outright. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. LOCATION: The project is located on the north side of SW Ross Street and just east of SW Hall Blvd.; WCTM 2S112CB, Tax Lot 17800. PROPOSED PARCEL 27: 6,577 Square Feet. PROPOSED PARCEL 28: 11,656 Square Feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.420, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.730, 18.765, 18.775, 18.795, 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 1 OF 17 • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT: Submit the following to the Planning Department (Brad Kilby 639-4171 x 388) for review and approval: 1. The applicant shall provide a copy of a current survey map to the Planning Division for approval prior to final plat approval. 2. The applicant shall provide the City with a copy of the recorded shared access easement prior to final plat approval. 3. Should any of the trees on site be damaged or removed during site preparation or development of the lots, the trees shall be replaced. 4. The applicant shall submit a copy of the recorded Lot Line Adjustment from the Washington County Auditor's office prior to final plat approval. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 5. A public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project to cover the half-street improvement work in SW Ross Street, as proposed by the applicant, and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). 6. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 7. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Kit Church, Engineering). 8. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Division which indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of SW Ross Street, as they proposed on the preliminary plan. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a minor collector street from curb to centerline equal to 20 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5 foot concrete sidewalk; F. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements; MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 2 OF 17 • G. street striping; H. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; underground utilities; J. street signs (if applicable); K. driveway apron (if applicable); and L. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Ross Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 9. The applicant shall provide a joint ingress/egress easement for Lots 27 and 28, as proposed on the preliminary plan. 10. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. 11. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. C. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive a letter from the City Engineering Department indicating: 1) that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor, and 2) that the applicant has either completed any public improvements associated with the project, or has at least obtained the necessary public improvement permit from the City to complete the work. D. Once the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer's signature. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 12. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a mylar copy of the recorded final plat. 13. Prior to issuance of a building permit on either lot (27 or 28), the applicant shall complete the proposed public improvements in SW Ross Street, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 14. Prior to issuance of the building permit for Lots 27 and 28, the applicant shall pay the standard water quality fee per lot (fee amount will be the latest approved by CWS). MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 3 OF 17 • 410 15. Prior to issuance of building permits for Lots 27 and 28, the Building Plans Examiner shall verify that the site plan for these lots show one joint driveway onto SW Ross Street, across from SW 84th Avenue. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Vicinity Information: The subject property is the undeveloped remaining lot (Lot 27) from the Hampton Court Subdivision (SUB98-00013). The property owner has an approval for a Lot Line Adjustment (MIS2001-00016) to increase the size of the lot between this parcel and the parcel directly to the north: The additional land enables the property to be divided. Property History: The parcel was formerly a portion of the Hampton Court Subdivision (Lot 27). Prior to that land use action, the land was vacant. Site Information and Proposal Description: The subject site is located just east of Hall Boulevard and north of Ross Street. The subject prope is described as Lot 27 of the Hampton Court Subdivision and is approximately 18,233 square feet. The site is relatively flat with slopes ranging from 0 to 5%. There are no structures on the subject property. Both properties are expected to access Ross Street by utilizing a shared access at the east end of proposed lot 28. SECTION IV. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS No comments were received from the public during the comment period. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this decision are as follows: A. Land Partitions 18.420 (Land Partitions) B. Zoning Districts 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts) C. Specific Development Standards 18.705 Access, Egress & Circulation) 18.715 Density Computations) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.795 isual Clearance)Impact Study Section 18.390.040) D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards) The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters: 18.720 (Design Compatibility), 18.725 (Environmental Performance Standards) 18.730 (Exceptions to Development Standards), 18.742 (Home Occupations), 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations , 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste & Recyclable Storage), 18.760 (Nonconforming Situations), 18.775 Sensitive Lands) 18.780 (Signs), 18.785 (Temporary Uses), 18.790 (Tree Removal), 18.797 (Water esource Overlay District) and 18.798 (Wireless Communication Facilities). These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 4 OF 17 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION LAND PARTITIONS: CHAPTER 18.420 Future re-division: Section 18.420.020.D When partitioning tracts into large parcels, the director shall require that the parcels be of such size and shape to facilitate future re-partitioning of such parcels in accordance with the requirements of the zoning district and this title. The proposal involves the division of .42 acre into two lots. The lot sizes for this partition would be 6,577 and 11,656 square feet respectively. The minimum lot size for the district is 5,000 square feet and the abnormal shape of the larger lot and the location of the shared access precludes it from any future division within the zoning district. This criteria is satisfied. Approval Criteria: Section 18.420.050 The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; The proposed partition will comply with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations at the time of proposed development as demonstrated both by the analysis presented within this administrative decision and by this application and review process through compliance with the conditions of approval. Therefore, this criterion is met. There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal; Public facilities are discussed in detail later in this decision. Based on the analysis provided herein, staff finds that adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal. Therefore this criterion is met. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards; and The public facilities and proposed improvements are discussed and conditioned later in this decision. Improvements will be reviewed as part of the permit rocess and during construction, at which time the appropriate review authority, will insure that City and applicable agency standards are met. Based on the analysis in this decision, this criterion is met. All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below: The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. The minimum lot width requirement in the R-7 zoning district is 50 feet. The widths of the newly created lots are proposed to be 83.02 feet and 219.58 feet respectively. Both lots will exceed the minimum lot width standard of 50 feet. Therefore, this criterion is met. The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area. The minimum lot area requirement in the R-7 zoning district is 5,000 square feet. The proposed lots exceed the minimum lot sizes of the zone. There are no flag lots associated with this proposal. Therefore, this criterion is met. Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access easement. Lot 27 will have frontage along both Ross Street and Hall Boulevard, and Lot 28 will have over 99 feet of frontage on Ross Street. This standard has been met. MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 5 OF 17 S 5' Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. No development is proposed in conjunction with this application. All setbacks will be applied at the time of future development. This standard has been met. When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. Neither of the proposed lots fit the definition of flag lot. Therefore, this standard is met. A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. This standard does not apply to this proposal. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities. The Fire District has indicated that the lot will not conflict with its operations. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. The applicant has proposed a shared access easement to achieve this standard. Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress, and Circulation. This standard is addressed under Chapter 18.705 in this decision. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. There is no one-hundred-year floodplain associated with this site. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable. An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in accordance with Chapter 18.370, Variances and Adjustments. The applications for the partition and variance(s)/adjustment(s) will be processed concurrently. No variances or adjustments are requested or required with this application. Therefore, this standard is not applicable. FINDING: The proposal involves a shared access between the two lots, and access must be perpetually assured to all newly created lots. CONDITION: The applicant shall provide the City with a copy of the recorded shared access easement prior to final plat approval. MLP2001-00009/1AMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 6 OF 17 • Residential Zoning Districts 18.510: Development standards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2 below: TABLE 18.510.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES STANDARD R-1 R-2 R-3.5 R-4.5 R-7 Minimum Lot Size -Detached unit 30,000 sq.ft. 20,000 sq.ft. 10,000 sq.ft. 7,500 sq.ft 5,000 sq.ft. -Duplexes 10,000 sq.ft. 10,000 sq.ft. -Attached unit[1] 5,000 sq.ft. Average Minimum Lot Width -Detached unit lots 100 ft. 100 ft. 65 ft. 50 ft. 50 ft. -Duplex lots 90 ft. 90 ft. 50 ft. -Attached unit lots 40 ft. Maximum Lot Coverage - - - - 80%[2] Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 30 ft. 30 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 15 ft. -Side facing street on comer&through lots 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 15 ft. 10 ft. -Side yard 5ft. 5ft. 5ft. 5ft. 5ft. -Rear yard 25 ft. 25 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district 30 ft. -Distance between property line and front of garage 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. Maximum Height 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 35 ft. Minimum Landscape Requirement - - - - 20% [1]Single-family attached residential units permitted at one dwelling per lot with no more that five attached units in one grouping. [2]Lot coverage includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. A minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet is required for each lot. The proposed lot sizes meet this standard, however, the site size shall be confirmed through a current survey prior to final plat approval. Setback and lot coverage standards will apply to future development of the sites. Section: 18.705 Access. Egress, and Circulation. Access, Egress and Circulation is partially addressed under Chapter 18.420 in this decision. In addition, the following provisions are applicable: Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.030 I shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. Curb cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N. Minimum access requirements for residential use. Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus by one of the following: a. A circular, paved surface having a minimum turn radius measured from center point to outside edge of 35 feet; b. A hammerhead-configured, paved surface with each leg of the hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a minimum width of 20 feet;. c. The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is 5%. This standard does not apply to this proposal. Vehicle turnouts, (providing a minimum total driveway width of 24 feet for a distance of at least 30 feet), may be required so as to reduce the need for excessive vehicular backing motions in situations where two vehicles traveling in opposite directions meet on driveways in excess of 200 feet in length; The proposed driveway is approximately 120 feet. This criterion does not apply MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 7 OF 17 Where permitted, minimum width for driveway approaches to arterials or collector streets shall be no less than 20 feet so as to avoid traffic turning from the street having to wait for traffic exiting the site. Ross Street is designated a minor collector on the City of Tigard's comprehensive transportation map. The proposal indicates a 15-foot wide driveway approach. As such, the access that is proposed in this application is inadequate. To meet this standard, the applicant must increase the width of the access by 5 feet . FINDING: The proposed access does not meet the minimum requirement for access to a collector street. CONDITION: The applicant shall revise the access plan to ensure that the approach to Ross Street is a minimum of 20 feet in width. DENSITY COMPUTATIONS: CHAPTER 18.715. 18.715.020 Density Calculation Density calculations are addressed to insure that the creation of new lots, in this case, will not prohibit future development. Definition of net development area. Net development area, in acres, shall be determined by subtracting the following land area(s) from the gross acres, which is all of the land included in the legal description of the property to be developed: 1. All sensitive land areas: a. Land within the 100-year floodplain; b. Land or slopes exceeding 25%; c. Drainage ways; and d. Wetlands. 2. All land dedicated to the public for park purposes; 3. All land dedicated for public rights-of-way. When actual information is not available, the following formulas may be used: a. Single-family development: allocate 20% of gross acreage; b. Multi-family development: allocate 15% of gross acreage. 4. All land proposed for private streets; and 5. A lot of at least the size required by the applicable base zoning district, if an existing dwelling is to remain on the site. B. Calculating maximum number of residential units. To calculate the maximum number of residential units per net acre, divide the number of square feet in the net acres by the minimum number of square feet required for each lot in the applicable zoning district. The maximum number of residential units that would be available to the site is three. This standard has been satisfied. C. Calculating minimum number of residential units. As required by Section 18.510.040, the minimum number of residential units per net acre shall be calculated by multiplying the maximum number of units determined in Subsection B above by 80% (0.8). The minimum number of residential units that the new lot can accommodate is two represented as 80% of the maximum. This standard has been satisfied. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING: CHAPTER: 18.745. MLP2001-00009/IiAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 8 OF 17 Street trees: Section 18.745.040 Section 18.745.040.A.: All development projects fronting on a public street, private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040C. Street Trees on this site were installed at the time of the Hampton Court Subdivision, and the applicant has indicated that all street trees will remain intact. This criterion is satisfied. TREE REMOVAL: CHAPTER: 18.790 - Tree Plan Requirement: Section 18.790.030 Tree plan required. A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. The applicant has indicated that none of the street trees would be removed during construction, and other than street trees, there are no other trees on site. The street trees were planted fairly recently. A plan for protection and removal from a certified arborist is not necessary. However, it should be noted that any trees that are damaged or removed during construction must be replaced, as they are a requirement for this proposal. CONDITION: Should any of the trees on site be damaged or removed during site preparation or development of the lot, the trees shall be replaced. VISUAL CLEARANCE AREAS: CHAPTER 18.795 Visual Clearance Requirements: Section 18.795.030 At corners. Except within the CBD zoning district a visual clearance area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to the intersection of two streets, a street and a railroad, or a driveway providing access to a public or private street. Obstructions prohibited. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street-center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. Additional topographical constraints. Where the crest of a hill or vertical curve conditions contribute to the obstruction of clear vision areas at a street or driveway intersection, hedges, plantings, fences, walls, wall structures and temporary, or permanent obstructions shalt- be further reduced in height or eliminated to comply with the intent of the required clear vision area. Computations: Section 18.795.040 Non-arterial streets. Non-arterial streets 24 feet or more in width. At all intersections of two non-arterial streets, a non-arterial street and a driveway, and a non-arterial street or driveway and railroad where at least one of the streets or driveways is 24 feet or more in width, a visual clearance area shall be a triangle formed by the right-of-way or property lines along such lots and a straight line joining the right-of-way or property line at points which are 30 feet distance from the intersection of the right-of-way line and measured along such lines. See Figure 18.795.1: MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 9 OF 17 0 • FIGURE 18.795.1 ILLUSTRATIONS OF VISUAL CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS WAY MI1111114 .��� , Vii,. �s��. . :G ' 4i0' k 3Dr � 3��0� � ; to 4-freek The applicant has identified visual clearance areas on the site. This criteria has been met and will be affirmed during plan review for building permits. D. IMPACT STUDY: Section 18.390.040.B.e Requires that the applicant shall include an impact study. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication of real property interest, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Rough Proportionality Analysis Based on a transportation impact study prepared for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan/Resolution 95-61, TI F's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development. Presently, the TIF for each residential trip that is generated is $226. According to the Washington County TIF ordinance, 32 percent of a projects impacts are met by its TIF assessment in Tigard. This leaves 68 percent unmitigated. The actual cost of system improvements per trip generated by new development on the Tigard street system can be determined byte following equation (Larson, Mackenzie Engineering, Dolan Findings, June 1995): $226 divided by .32 equals $725. ($226 is the residential use trip rate per trip TIF assessment according to the Washington County TIF ordinance). According to the ITE manual figures and the TIF ordinance, a single-family residential unit generates 10 average weekday trips per dwelling unit per day. As there are two dwelling units proposed, 20 trips are generated per day for this site. Less Mitigated Costs The applicant is required to improve an additional 5 feet of right-of-way along 79.77 feet of the projects frontage along Ross Street. At an approximate cost of $3 per square foot, this is valued at approximately$1,196.55. MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 10 OF 17 Estimate of unmitigated impacts Full Impact is equal to 20 daily trips x $725 = $14,500 Less TIF Assessment 20 daily trips x$226 = $4,520 Less Mitigated costs = $1,196.55 Equals the unmitigated Impact of$8,783.45 FINDING: Using the above cost factors, it can be determined that the unmitigated impacts of the development exceed the costs of the conditions imposed and, therefore, the conditions are roughly proportionate to the impacts sustained and thereby justified. E. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS: CHAPTER 18.810 Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a minor collector street to have a 60-foot right-of-way width and a 40-foot paved section. An arterial street should have a 90-foot right-of-way width and a variable paved width. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Ross Street, which is classified as a minor collector on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is 60 feet of ROW along this roadway, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. That ROW was dedicated as a part of the Hampton Court Subdivision. No further dedications are required. The final plat of the Hampton Court Subdivision also provided a ROW dedication on SW Hall Boulevard adjacent to this site of 45 feet from centerline. No additional dedications are required. Therefore, ODOT's comments, dated July 19, 2001, are not applicable. Both SW Ross Street and SW Hall Boulevard were fully improved as a part of the Hampton Court Subdivision. Again, ODOT's comments concerning SW Hall Boulevard, are not applicable. There is a portion of SW Ross Street along the frontage of the additional property, purchased by the applicant that is not fully improved. For this frontage, the applicant has proposed additional half-street improvements, including concrete sidewalk and a new driveway apron to serve the existing house on Tax Lot 900 (Schmidt). These improvements will need to be constructed prior to issuance of building permits on either lot. MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 11 OF 17 • Driveway Access When this lot (Lot 27) was platted as a part of the Hampton Court Subdivision, the applicant was told that the only potential driveway for this lot would be across from SW 84th Avenue. The applicant's plan appropriately shows one driveway across from SW 84th Avenue that will serve as a joint driveway between the two lots. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030(F) states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de- sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. The area around this partition is fully developed and there are no other streets to extend. Cul-de-sacs: 18.810.030.K states that a cul-de-sac shall be no more than 200 feet long, shall not provide access to greater than 20 dwelling units, and shall only be used when environmental or topographical constraints, existing development pattern, or strict adherence to other standards in this code preclude street extension and through circulation: • All cul-de-sacs shall terminate with a turnaround. Use of turnaround configurations other than circular, shall be approved by the City Engineer; and • The length of the cul-de-sac shall be measured along the centerline of the roadway from the near side of the intersecting street to the farthest point of the cul-de-sac. • If a cul-de-sac is more than 300 feet long, a lighted direct pathway to an adjacent street may be required to be provided and dedicated to the City. There are no cul-de-sacs associated with this partition. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. The minimum lot width requirement in the R-7 zoning district is 50 feet. The widths of the newly created lots are proposed to be 83.02 feet and 219.58 feet respectively. The lot depths are 77.19 and 105.90 respectively. This standard has been satisfied. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. Lot 27 will have frontage along both Ross Street and Hall Boulevard, and Lot 28 will have over 99 feet of frontage on Ross Street. This standard has been met. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. By constructing the additional concrete sidewalk adjacent to the additional purchased frontage, as proposed by the applicant, this standard will be met. MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 12 OF 17 • • • Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sewer main located in SW 84th Avenue that can adequately serve both lots. The applicant's plan shows they will tap the existing manhole in SW Ross Street and extend a 6- inch public sewer lateral, per CWS Design and Construction Standards. The work in SW Ross Street will require a permit from the Engineering Department. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). All upstream flows were adequately addressed as a part of the Hampton Court Subdivision. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. MLP2001-00009/11AMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 13 OF 17 ! • The storm drainage system constructed as a part of the Hampton Court Subdivision was sized to accommodate the potential of the two lots. No additional downstream improvements are necessary. ODOT's comments to Staff, dated July 19, 2001, indicate they recommend the applicant provide a drainage plan to ODOT District 2A. Based upon the criteria in their letter, as to when an applicant would need to obtain a permit from ODOT, Staff does not recommend such a condition. The additional lot will not increase the impervious area of this site over 1,000 square meters. And the additional runoff from that additional lot will not exceed .05 cubic meters per second. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Hall Boulevard has an existing bikeway that fully constructed, therefore, no bikeway/pedestrian path is required at this location. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. Not applicable. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. Not applicable. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 14 OF 17 • • placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. This criterion was already addressed as a part of the Hampton Court Subdivision. No additional requirements are necessary. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: There is a 12-inch public water main adjacent to the ROW of SW Hall Boulevard that the applicant intends to tap for the services. The applicant will need to coordinate with the City's water division for these new services. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The Hampton Court Subdivision was approved for the fee in-lieu of water quality, as it was impractical to construct an onsite facility. The two lots will also be approved for the fee in-lieu. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final plat. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00 for the additional address. MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION • PAGE 15 OF 17 • Survey Requirements The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Water Department has offered the following comment: • No objections—water service will be installed once meters have been purchased. City of Tigard Operations Department indicated the following: • Outside of the service area. City of Tigard Building Division reviewed the proposal and provided the following comment: • Fire Department shall approve access and fire hydrant location. City of Tigard Police Department reviewed the proposal but had no comment. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services was notified but did not comment. Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue finds that there will be no conflict with protection interests. Oregon Department of Transportation indicated that the project would need to address concerns on Hall Blvd. Theses concerns have been addressed in the conditions and comments from engineering. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 30, 2001 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 14, 2001 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. A _11 The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 16 OF 17 • • and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 13, 2001 Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. July 30, 2001 PREPARED BY: Brad Kilb DATE Associate Planner ' ' July 30, 2001 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewer d rff DATE Planning Manager MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PAGE 17 OF 17 -_ ,4'1 ' MA CITY of TIGARD W.' r rill � •� GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM lak ;w I' VICINITY MAP rn r m 0p . �� I LL PINEBROOK ~ \ ( till WEIN iWi: - I ip, . I w Ai 7 M LP200 l-00009 e MURDOCK ST ,Q d F`''0 ce rp• SW VIOLA S HAM PTO N COURT L- MANCHA W PARTITION w-it;: `,12 IIIIII �T SITE WESTIc1? i 111 WA �; .m SATTLER ST •°A L , NE _7� . I , e lin/MM i � MMB u—I 0 I i i W C.: :A D k i, BRAEBURN w LAN qe,R II Ei �� ■.W w nun Alum s: GRAVENSTIEN LN a OD p LA _ Will :.1111111111111 I I II 5.1111..111.1.1111M.J\liaa =, 411111111111th ii- lal ' ' � 1111111.a BELLFLOWER a•-we r ma impa=w��' sta ■ N SW PIPPEN LN _ 1111 • iw • w ;I!i ,--<-- ) 1�1 _ 0 200 400 600 Feet S 4S iFORD ST , * ~1I 1=404 feet ■C 1 I ` II IA A G -F ST iii City of Tigard �;1;11���f,��liiir� s • ' �r. Inforrne ve on this map is for 9enerel location only and I'„�, I ',� .WARM should be ven0ed w' 13125 SW Hall Blvd . ��. ,� .� Tigard,OR 97223 KfrAlkata4 , (ww 639-4171 -■■■.■. http:/fw•w✓.ci,ti9ard.or.us e0 �'"�` 'i� Plot date:Jul 9,2001;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR Community Development T I I 0. g 1 — I SHARED ACCESS/ SS EASEMENT .� I -1.3.71--- 28280' _ ----- r*�p'jam%7 `� _— 21s+se' _ 3O' vlsaoN ,n�:. 4s' PUBLIC UIIUTY EASEMENT CLEARANCE NI.10, 224+00 _ — ---I---- – — — — — "'I! � . I • {; (— I LOT 28 0 0� CO �. I LOT 27 I 11,656 sq.ft. / I ' 6,577 sq.ft. tP1lE / !. � �.,.. ' \ _ ... Y �t� LOT 20 3S VISION / 0 \ 3 I \CLEARANCE / /_,Ip•OD '•,..•• . , .� It LOT 26 L-47.50' ' rem! ► ... ,...,• RI•30,00' L=28.04' .9 \ LOT 21 L-4..74' 81.170.00' �r . \ • 220+00 221+� \ N I LOT 25 LOT 1 k$ \ \ / • \ � ��. \ ` 1 LOT 23 • QF TIGARD CITY _... CITY ornoAao MLP2001.00009 SITE PLAN N HAMPTON COURT PARTITION (Map is not to scale) • • EXHIBIT B . Tri-Angle LLC Steve Roper MLP2001-00009 11290 SW Blakeney Street HAMPTON COURT PARTITION Beaverton, OR 97008 Matrix Development Corporation Jacki Herb 12755 SW 69th Avenue, Suite 100 Portland, OR 97223 ODOT/Region 1 Marah Danielson, Development Review 123 NW Flanders Portland, OR 97209-4037 • • S • A AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING TYOFh n CITY OF IGARD Community<Deve(opment Shaping Better Community 1, cPatricia L. Lunsforcd being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for - the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Ap xop�e Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: MLP200I-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION ' • ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked EXhihit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on July 30,2001, and deposited in the United States Mail on July 30,2001, postage prepaid. _ i/ �k iLíL W so. ha 'repar-. Noti`! STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of(Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 3 reA day of , 2001. ,0:,:'...-''''.- OFFICIAL SEAL ,;^ .r DIANE M JELDERKS / •' �' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.326578 / /'/r MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 ��! ' I il" ' II I I ' a, l)' My Commission EXpi 7 : 0 • • EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION vid MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2001-00009 All- IG CITY OF TIGARD Communzty HAMPTON COURT PARTITION ping ABette Community ShapingA BetterCommunity 120 DAYS = 11/06/2001 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: HAMPTON COURT PARTITION CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2001-00009 PROPOSAL: Approval of a 2-lot Minor Land Partition of .42 acres in conjunction with a Lot Line Adjustment with the property directly to the north. The lot is to be developed with detached single-family homes. The lot sizes for this development would be 6,577 and 11,656 square feet respectively. APPLICANT: Matrix Development Corp. 12755 SW 69th Avenue, Suite 100 Portland, OR 97223 OWNER: Same as Applicant. ZONING DESIGNATION: City of Tigard R-7 zoning district. The R-7 zoning district is designed to accommodate attached single-family homes, detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet, and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks and subdivisions are also permitted outright. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. LOCATION: The project is located on the North side of Ross Street and just East of SW Hall Blvd.; WCTM 2S112CB, Tax Lot 17800. PROPOSED PARCEL 27: 6,577 Square Feet. PROPOSED PARCEL 28: 11,656 Square Feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.420, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.730, 18.765, 18.775, 18.795, 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: 0 • , THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 30, 2001 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 14, 2001 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. AppoI: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 13, 2001. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Brad Kilby at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. r ��� i r� �� -z ,� hr �,i_ - CITY of TIOHRB PIN :•..K■ �. � � �.,� MAIL moor r *'�_ *�11�1c` VICINITY MAP ill 11.14141 0■ • ■■s.� moss. • 1111 1111111AA1 ■ ,ii: A1 1r I0 M= R arc ■ �■ MI.P200I-00009 1� ITV' 111■1-t— mooron e ri,I � =tea= iiii .. ■ HAMPTON COURT PIT/111•; ►/ gladioli moo �• PARTITION ivI l►,,glall IMP Hi.. ME Hs, m J :s 111111 gi i ■ �11l1/I1 kU. ■►is . - �_ ■ BATTLER p n■■■■. / ■■■■■ ...mg ! • ■ ��' ��411111 MI • ■■■■■ rill W■■■■ll iii i■i... 11m■ MI III f* � � ■ �`■���°� ��11 U111111111� hIII ■■■■■,:misu■■ ■dial■ . �. /'11111 ■1 ■■■■■•■■■■■■�■ ■■■■.■ = imiuiiuu: MM. --..x`:111 g iA ���a4Y:lR: Y iii.....ilmi■■ ■■■.a M woeu/:w�� -■'..�■ �/ �^.I�77ddq: ■ ,•,r, B Ow->--..�'-- ■• N :.■■■■■■■■ • eVf "l .a��-- : 111-�m ■-■■■■u■■■"■ --°-r. 1 ..■■■■■■■■° um * - --: il%111111IuIu1auur• 111111111111 = c;'!rvg. MI � t1I'! ff3A _0 zra ..� I V g y I SUM ACCESS/n wear I I __ __ znaso _ �a ------- �. b� �utt wofm a:AaMSC foi zz••^o II" _ _ ' O �A Q l � ��r__ � LOT 28 ,�? / ... .. ....-2--L- ai .. i LOT 27 I VAX 11.838 aq.ft. / ' �, \ 6.377.q.fl. I I ) �// ' it r(c S = as7 71906 I ( ) �C�'' 9 wr zo l \CIlAR/Jlff � / d5 i ( 0T26 \ �ew�rmi a.00 ar 4 . /' lot zl • "17r t \f]11.-47.00' 00., 21,� NOT 2e \- 0, 0T 1 \ 4 \\ aT z a N \ � - � ® • CITY OF TIGARD t MLP2001.00009 SITE PLAN N HAMPTON COURT PARTITION (Map Is not to stale) ,l,tLPGooI-q 2S111AD-09700 25111 DA-01200 • £)IBIT B ABUKHATER MARWAN&JANET LEE CHA ERIC I&STEPHANIE W 8705 SW REILING ST 8627 SW LODI LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 11 DA-02700 2S1 11 DA-03000 ADEN DAVID M&DANA M CHAGNON STACY A 8575 SW LODI LN 8585 SW BRAEBURN LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 DA-01300 2S112CB-13100 ALLEN RICHARD JAY& COOK JILLENE D DOUGLAS-ALLEN JUDY A 14932 SW KENTON DR 8605 SW LODI LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CB-15500 2S112CB-13500 ANDERSON STEVEN J& CRAIG KEVIN R& ELIZABETH M CHERYL L 8439 SW NORFOLK CT 14852 SW KENTON DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 AD-10500 2S 111 AD-09000 BEHRENS SANDRA ROSS DICKEY RANDEE SUE 15050 SW 88TH 8775 SW REILING ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112BC-10600 2S112CB-17100 BENSON BARBARA J DOBSON MARK J& 8256 SW MATTHEW PARK ST DOMINIQUE TIGARD,OR 97224 15111 SW 83RD TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112CB-16000 25111 DA-01800 BERGER RENEA L DUGAN KELLY J&JILL C 15301 SW 84TH AVE 8602 SW LODI LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CB-08400 2S112CB-13300 BERNHARD EDWARD A& EKBERG TIMOTHY L&LILLY M BERNHARD DIANNA 14896 SW KENTON DR 15038 SW KENTON DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111AD-10400 2S112CB-12400 BLOOM CHRISTINE M EVERHART WILLIAM W&GEORGIA A 897 NW SILVERADO DR 8145 SW ROSS ST BEAVERTON,OR 97006 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 AD-10600 2S112CB-17500 BURKE AMY E& FERGUSON KEITH LAMAR& BURKE BRIAN T CHONG 0 15080 SW 88TH AVE 15180 SW 84TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 '2S 1110A-03200 • • 2S 111 DA-02600 FISCHER KENT D&PAMELA S HAUSKINS JANET MAUREEN 15212 SW MCINTOSH TERR 8591 SW LODI LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CB-08500 2S 112CB-08200 FOX JOHN NELSON&SHARON M HAWKINS JEREMY& 15050 SW KENTON DR HAWKINS MALCOLM J& TIGARD,OR 97224 HAWKINS ELAINE L 15029 SW KENTON DR PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S 112CB-16300 2S 111 DA-00900 GALLINGER BENJAMIN W& HAYS LESLIE M KARI M 8601 SW BRAEBURN LN 8310 SW NORFOLK LN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112CB-16900 2S 112CB-17300 GATTO MICHAEL E&JENNIFER S HENSLEY BRET H&KIMBERLY MAH • 15150 SW 83RD AVE 8313 SW NORFOLK LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 DA-01000 2S 111 AD-10300 GILCHRIST PAUL E&CYNTHIA J HODGSON DAVID A/GEORGANNE C 8601 SW BRAEBURN LN 8740 SW REILING ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CB-15900 2S 112CB-00500 GOEDJEN DON& HOGGAN RICHARD E/GAYLE A GOEDJEN WES 15233 SW 81ST AVE 12755 SW 69TH AVE#100 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112CB-15700 2511 CB-00600 HA CU XUAN& HOG N [CHARD E/GAYLE A LE HANG THI 15233 81ST AVE 8450 NW NORFOLK CT TI RD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 •25112CB-14400 2S111AD-10800 HALDEMAN MARK R& HOGUE BRIAN C HALDEMAN JENNIFER C 15140 SW 88TH AVE 14943 SW KENTON DR TIGARD,OR 97224 • TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 AD-06300 2S 111 AD-09200 HAMBACH CATHALEEN TRUSTEE HONE JEFFREY JOHN&ADELE F 14815 SW HALL BLVD 8755 SW REILING ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112C8-17900 2S112C8-13400 HAMPTON COURT OWNERS OF JANSEN DANA L LOTS 3-8 14874 SW KENTON DR 12755 SW 69TH AVE STE 100 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 2S11.1 DA-02409 2S112CB-00700 JEDAN MICHAEL E& MANGOLD STEVEN R&DEBRA E HEIRONIMUS BETH A 8275 SW ROSS ST 8574 SW LODI LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CB-08300 2S 112CB-08600 JORDAHL JAMES L& MARTIN LISA M OCKENFELS-JORDAHL CATHERINE A 15072 SW KENTON DR 15016 SW KENTON DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 DA-03100 2S 111 DA-03300 KARIMZADEH MANOUCHEHR& MASTERSON MARK A&DEBORAH L GHORBAN FARIBA 15222 SW MCINTOSH TER 8571 SW BRAEBURN LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 DA-02800 2S112CB-16200 KAYSER MARK E& MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORP KIMBERLY J 12755 SW 69TH AVE 8572 SW BRAEBURN LN STE#100 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S111AD-09100 2S112CB-16400 LARSEN JULIE ANN MA RIX P. VELOPMENT CORP 8765 SW REILING ST 1275' :W 69TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 ST ,1 TI ARD, S R 97223 2S112CB-12900 2S112CB-16500 LAYMAN DEVIN F& M RI EVELOPMENT CORP ARMSTRONG JIA 127 W 69TH AVE 14976 SW KENTON DR ST 0' TIGARD,OR 97224 T AR ,OR 97223 2S112CB-15600 2S112CB-16700 LUNGO CHRIS& M TRI DEVELOPMENT CORP LAUREN 12 SW 69TH AVE 8443 SW NORFOLK CT S 00 TIGARD,OR 97224 GAR ,OR 97223 2S111DA-02300 2S112CB-17 00 LUTES DAVID M&NADIE A MATRIX EVELOPMENT CORP 8577 SW BELLFLOWER ST 12 5 69TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 STE 100 TI AR ,OR 97223 2S 112CB-12500 2S112CB-16800 LUTTER STEPHAN G& M TRI EVELOPMENT CORP KELLIE S 12 SW 69TH AVE 15033 SW 81ST AVE ST 0 PORTLAND,OR 97224 T GAR ,OR 97223 2S112CB-08700 2S112CB-17•a MACDANOLD MARGARET A& MA RIX a EVELOPMENT CORP MACDANOLD MILDRED V 127-. .W 69TH AVE 15094 SW KENTON DR ST '0 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIcARO,OR 97223 • • 2S112CB- 5200 2S112CB-14900 M TRI DEVELOPMENT CORP OREGON DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 127 SW 69TH AVE FINANCIAL SERVICES ST 0 355 CAPITOL ST NE RM 434 TI ARD,OR 97223 SALEM,OR 97301 2S1 11 DA-00800 2S 112CB-17200 M TRIX EVELOPMENT CORP PHILLIPS PERPETUA M 127 5 W 69TH AVE 15151 SW 83RD AVE ST 00 TIGARD,OR 97224 TI AR ,OR 97223 2S 112CB-15400 2S 112CB-13600 MATRI EVELOPMENT CORP PITTMON BRADLEY J&LAURIE G 12 W 69TH AVE 14830 SW KENTON DR ST 00 TIGARD,OR 97224 T GAR ,OR 97223 2S 112CB-17700 2S 111 DA-02500 M TRIX VELOPMENT CORP PLATTER M PHILLIP& 12 5 W 69TH AVE DEANNE K ST 0 8590 SW LODI LN T GAR ,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112C8-1 00 2S 111 DA-03600 M TRI EVELOPMENT CORP RANOA FRANCIS A&EDNA S 127 SW 69TH AVE 15310 SW MCINTOSH TER S # 0 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 AD-09800 2S 111 DA-03400 NEJAD KAZEM KN&SALARI MARZEI REYNOLDS LUCIA&ROBERT 14473 SW 134TH 15230 SW MCINTOSH TER TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 DA-01100 2S 111 AD-10100 NGUYEN HENRY H& RIJKEN TODD W& YUEN CHIU-KUEN CARSLEY KENLYNN E 8600 SW BRAEBURN LN 8720 SW REILING ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CB-17000 2S 112CB-14700 NGUYEN HOANG H&JACKIE P ROLLINS SANDRA K&JACK A 15110 SW 83RD AVE 15007 SW KENTON DR HILLSBORO,OR 97124 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 DA-03500 2S112BC-10700 NGUYEN THANH V& SCHMIDT JANE V& VU OANH K CLARK BARBARA J& 15242 SW NCINTOSH TERR MCFALL MARY M TRUSTEES TIGARD,OR 97224 8325 SW ROSS ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CB-13200 2S 112CB-00900 NIELSEN CAROLYN M SC IDT JANE V& 14910 SW KENTON DR CLA ARBARA J& TIGARD,OR 97223 MCFA MARY M TRUSTEES 8325 OSS ST TI RD,OR 97224 '2S111 DA-02900 • 2s111AD-10700 SCOTT THOMAS I& WESTFALL DAVID K AND ALLISON NANCY K TINA M 8580 SW BRAEBURN LN 15110 SW 88TH TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 AD-09900 2S 112CB-14500 SERGIO U ANGEL Z& WILHELM HARALD&MARCI A ZARCO JOEL ANGEL& 14967 SW KENTON DR ANGEL LORENZO TIGARD,OR 97224 8700 SW REILLING ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112C6-15300 2S 111 AD-10000 SIMSHAUSER ERIK&LISA M WILLIAMSON LARRY C AND 15179 SW 84TH AVE SANDRA L TIGARD,OR 97224 8710 SW REILING TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112C8-13000 2S 111 AD-09400 SKIDMORE SHIRLEY A& WINTERS MARVIN F& QUANT RONALD E WINTERS JOHN W 14954 SW KENTON DR 19000 SW MCCORMICK HILL RD TIGARD,OR 97224 HILLSBORO,OR 97123 2S112CB-16100 2S 111 AD-09500 SOWERS JAMES ROBERT& WIN ERS ARVIN F& HANSEN EMILY CATHERINE WINT JOHN W 8360 SW NORFOLK LN 190 S MCCORMICK HILL RD TIGARD,OR 97223 HI SBO 0,OR 97123 2S 112CB-12800 2S1 11 AD-09600 SYMES DAVID P R WIN R ARVIN F& 15000 SW KENTON DR WINT JOHN W TIGARD,OR 97224 190 S MCCORMICK HILL RD HI LSBOR ,OR 97123 2S112CB-15800 2S111AD-09300 TELFER CHRISTINE L WINT RS ARVIN F& 8420 SW NORFOLK CT WINT JOHN W TIGARD,OR 97224 1900 S MCCORMICK HILL RD HIL SBOR ,OR 97123 2S 11DA-:500 2S112CB-14600 TIG';% CITY OF WISE RONALD H 131 •W HALL 10598 SW NAEVE ST TI ARD, SR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111AD-08900 2S111AD-10200 TUCKER-MCCOY PATRICIA ANN WOODY SAMUEL T&REBECCA R 8785 SW REILING ST 8730 SW REILING ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 • 2S 112CB-16600 WARD LYN 8250 SW NORFOLK LN TIGARD,OR 97224 • • • Sally Christensen CITY OF TIGARD 15685 SW 76th Avenue SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 97224 is\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc UPDATED: 7-Nov-00 Mary Ann Melvin Kristen Miller 10395 SW Bonanza Way 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Stephen Bicker Bill Finck 14235 SW 97th Avenue 9235 SW Mountain View Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Mark Bogert Craig Dirksen 14445 SW 100th Avenue 9131 SW Hill Street Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Twyla Brady Paul Owen 9360 SW Edgewood Street 10335 SW Highland Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Debra Muir Rick Boyce 15065 SW 79th Avenue 7800 SW Bond Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Siebold Bob Oleson 15374 SW Thurston Lane 9023 SW Reiling Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esav Stacie Yost PO Box 230695 8465 SW Langtree Tigard, OR 97281 Tigard, OR 97224 Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt.#3 Tigard, OR 97224-3376 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 _, A • • . 4 ,. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING Al di!CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community SralE OAF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, cPatriciaL. Lu�ord being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of?igar Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check APpopoete Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: MLP2001-00009/HAMPTON COURT PARTITION ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on July 10,2001,and deposited in the United States Mail on July 10,2001, postage prepaid. I - Imo► i•■�,- G vr7 (Person that Prepared ■ .ticj Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 3 r`e day of --Gt. , 2001.• �4 � OFFICIAL SEAL I-.;°`' P-: DIANE M JELDERKS '.,`i..0 NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION N0.328578 )ii MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,20rtK gl" Y 110 cOF0 4,4112 Mil Commission " es: c�? � 3 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHO.R,VENDOR OR SELLER: • EXHIBIT A THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION µ i'. MINOR LAND PARTITION CITY OF TIGARD Community Deve4ment Skaping A Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: July 10, 2001 FILE NUMBER: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2001-00009 FILE NAME: HAMPTON COURT PARTITION PROPOSAL: Approval of a 2-lot Minor Land Partition of .42 acres in conjunction with a Lot Line Adjustment with the property directly to the north. The lot is to be developed with detached single-family homes. The lot sizes for this development would 6,577 and 11,656 square feet respectively. ZONE: R-7: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-7 zoning district is designed to accommodate attached single-family homes, detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet, and duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks and subdivisions are also permitted outright. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.420, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.730, 18.765, 18.775, 18.795, 18.810. LOCATION: 8421 SW Ross Street; WCTM 2S112CB, Tax Lot 17800. The project is located on the north side of SW Ross Street and just east of SW Hall Boulevard. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON JULY 24. 2001. All comments should be directed to Brad Kilby, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST 2, 2001. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure, of any party to addressie relevant approval criteria with efficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." _ 11.7, 8g..„„ •• .iR ' Mq;. CITY of TIGARD Em_�' •'I— �= ` ••� ■ VICINITY MAP mum mmw PI EBROO .- - ■ II.-" I�l,a : 11,1011-1111 i���r O:.m�;��1. �. -I MLP200I-00009 I I 1111111 ��- CHAMPTON COURT �i_ PARTITION o �11� X111 ��■ J!gill%%Ill °WV ,,'iii* Iiui 1 gm SIT L Ill i iI`1 llim1►7i im II SATTLER ST .0:.=.= . y , w I i 1 1 yfffl r�.I. MOWS - .du Ii • pus• �oa w•mmii iu■Ri■ii■■ ■m II :GRA NSTIENLN ;■VG g sll, ��1111111111111 ■I/��1. I v ,a•••••••• .i,■III D 11111111111- CE= =111 if ■■■■■ .m�� /��.i►11rI- --. ..1• •c�( W PI PEN Lf ' Urn �VI EA■�`t r J �I I I I /a ,1,,,,, ' M III ■, o zoo liq I IR°s�1 i �1r� 1�1- �wilw 11111 -No III MO 11111111111ia .. ssissio�11�� plIV� 11111111111_1 IN City of Tigard `,,' L. S /` �_ —r_ Tqu30R 11231 ,,'.,,- #1 _`e /. g•Tr V �O Nroi.OR172 /��, C OA,ue v�un,cr=,n, • EXHIBIT B 2S 111 AD-09700 2S 111 DA-01200 ABUKHATER MARWAN&JANET LEE CHA ERIC I&STEPHANIE W 8705 SW REILING ST 8627 SW LODI LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 DA-02700 2S 111 DA-03000 ADEN DAVID M&DANA M CHAGNON STACY A 8575 SW LODI LN 8585 SW BRAEBURN LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 25111 DA-01300 2S112CB-13100 ALLEN RICHARD JAY& COOK JILLENE D DOUGLAS-ALLEN JUDY A 14932 SW KENTON DR 8605 SW LODI LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S11208-15500 2S112CB-13500 ANDERSON STEVEN J& CRAIG KEVIN R& ELIZABETH M CHERYL L 8439 SW NORFOLK CT 14852 SW KENTON DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 AD-10500 2S 111 AD-09000 BEHRENS SANDRA ROSS DICKEY RANDEE SUE 15050 SW 88TH 8775 SW REILING ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112BC-10600 2S112CB-17100 BENSON BARBARA J DOBSON MARK J& 8256 SW MATTHEW PARK ST DOMINIQUE TIGARD,OR 97224 15111 SW 83RD TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112CB-16000 2S 111 DA-01800 BERGER RENEA L DUGAN KELLY J&JILL C 15301 SW 84TH AVE 8602 SW LODI LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CB-08400 2S 112CB-13300 BERNHARD EDWARD A& EKBERG TIMOTHY L&LILLY M BERNHARD DIANNA 14896 SW KENTON DR 15038 SW KENTON DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 AD-10400 2S112CB-12400 BLOOM CHRISTINE M EVERHART WILLIAM W&GEORGIA A 897 NW SILVERADO DR 8145 SW ROSS ST BEAVERTON,OR 97006 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 AD-10600 2S112CB-17500 BURKE AMY E& FERGUSON KEITH LAMAR& BURKE BRIAN T CHONG 0 15080 SW 88TH AVE 15180 SW 84TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 • • 2S1111A-03200` 2S111DA-02600 FISCHER KENT D&PAMELA S HAUSKINS JANET MAUREEN 15212 SW MCINTOSH TERR 8591 SW LODI LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CB-08500 2S 112CB-08200 FOX JOHN NELSON&SHARON M HAWKINS JEREMY& 15050 SW KENTON DR HAWKINS MALCOLM J& TIGARD,OR 97224 HAWKINS ELAINE L 15029 SW KENTON DR PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S 112CB-16300 2S1 11 DA-00900 GALLINGER BENJAMIN W& HAYS LESLIE M KARI M 8601 SW BRAEBURN LN 8310 SW NORFOLK LN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S112CB-16900 2S112CB-17300 GATTO MICHAEL E&JENNIFER S HENSLEY BRET H&KIMBERLY MAH • 15150 SW 83RD AVE 8313 SW NORFOLK LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 DA-01000 2S 111 AD-10300 GILCHRIST PAUL E&CYNTHIA J HODGSON DAVID A/GEORGANNE C 8601 SW BRAEBURN LN 8740 SW REILING ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CB-15900 2S 112CB-00500 GOEDJEN DON& HOGGAN RICHARD E/GAYLE A GOEDJEN WES 15233 SW 81ST AVE 12755 SW 69TH AVE#100 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112CB-15700 2S11 CB-00600 HA CU XUAN& HOG N ICHARD E/GAYLE A LE HANG THI 15233 81ST AVE 8450 NW NORFOLK CT TI RD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CB-14400 2S 111 AD-10800 HALDEMAN MARK R& HOGUE BRIAN C HALDEMAN JENNIFER C 15140 SW 88TH AVE 14943 SW KENTON DR TIGARD,OR 97224 • TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 AD-06300 2S 111 AD-09200 HAMBACH CATHALEEN TRUSTEE HONE JEFFREY JOHN&ADELE F 14815 SW HALL BLVD 8755 SW REILING ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CB-17900 2S 112CB-13400 HAMPTON COURT OWNERS OF JANSEN DANA L LOTS 3-8 14874 SW KENTON DR 12755 SW 69TH AVE STE 100 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • • 2S 111 DA-02400 2S112CB-00700 JEDAN MICHAEL E& MANGOLD STEVEN R&DEBRA E HEIRONIMUS BETH A 8275 SW ROSS ST 8574 SW LODI LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CB-08300 2S 112CB-08600 JORDAHL JAMES L& MARTIN LISA M OCKENFELS-JORDAHL CATHERINE A 15072 SW KENTON DR 15016 SW KENTON DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 DA-03100 2S 111 DA-03300 KARIMZADEH MANOUCHEHR& MASTERSON MARK A&DEBORAH L GHORBAN FARIBA 15222 SW MCINTOSH TER 8571 SW BRAEBURN LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 DA-02800 2S 112CB-16200 KAYSER MARK E& MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORP KIMBERLY J 12755 SW 69TH AVE 8572 SW BRAEBURN LN STE#100 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S111AD-09100 2S112CB-16400 LARSEN JULIE ANN MA RIX c VELOPMENT CORP 8765 SW REILING ST 1275' :W 69TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 ST :1 • TI ARD, •R 97223 2S112CB-12900 2S112CB-16500 LAYMAN DEVIN F& M RI EVELOPMENT CORP ARMSTRONG JIA 127 W 69TH AVE 14976 SW KENTON DR ST Cr TIGARD,OR 97224 T AR ,OR 97223 2S112CB-15600 2S112CB-16700 LUNGO CHRIS& M TRI DEVELOPMENT CORP LAUREN 12 SW 69TH AVE 8443 SW NORFOLK CT S 00 TIGARD,OR 97224 GAR ,OR 97223 2S111 DA-02300 2S 112CB-17•I• LUTES DAVID M&NADIE A MATRIX EVELOPMENT CORP 8577 SW BELLFLOWER ST 12 .5 1 69TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 STE• 00 TI&AR I,OR 97223 • 2S112CB-12500 2S112CB-16800 LUTTER STEPHAN G& M TRI EVELOPMENT CORP KELLIE S 12 SW 69TH AVE 15033 SW 81ST AVE ST 0 PORTLAND,OR 97224 T GAR ,OR 97223 2S112CB-08700 2S112CB-17 00 MACDANOLD MARGARET A& MA RIX EVELOPMENT CORP MACDANOLD MILDRED V 127 W 69TH AVE 15094 SW KENTON DR STE 0 TIGARD,OR 97224 TI AR ,OR 97223 • • • 2S112CB- 5200 2S112CB-14900 M TRI DEVELOPMENT CORP OREGON DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 127 SW 69TH AVE FINANCIAL SERVICES ST 0 355 CAPITOL ST NE RM 434 TI ARD,OR 97223 SALEM,OR 97301 2S1 11 DA-00800 2S112CB-17200 M TRIX EVELOPMENT CORP PHILLIPS PERPETUA M 127 W 69TH AVE 15151 SW 83RD AVE ST 00 TIGARD,OR 97224 TI AR ,OR 97223 2S112CB-15400 2S112CB-13600 MATRI EVELOPMENT CORP PITTMON BRADLEY J&LAURIE G 12 W 69TH AVE 14830 SW KENTON DR ST 00 TIGARD,OR 97224 T GAR ,OR 97223 2S112CB-17700 2S111DA-02500 M TRIX VELOPMENT CORP PLATTER M PHILLIP& 12 5 W 69TH AVE DEANNE K ST 0 8590 SW LODI LN T GAR ,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CB-1 00 2S 111 DA-03600 M TRI EVELOPMENT CORP RANOA FRANCIS A&EDNA S 127 SW 69TH AVE 15310 SW MCINTOSH TER S # 0 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 AD-09800 2S 111 DA-03400 NEJAD KAZEM KN&SALARI MARZEI REYNOLDS LUCIA&ROBERT 14473 SW 134TH 15230 SW MCINTOSH TER TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 DA-01100 2S 111 AD-10100 NGUYEN HENRY H& RIJKEN TODD W& YUEN CHIU-KUEN CARSLEY KENLYNN E _ 8600 SW BRAEBURN LN 8720 SW REILING ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CB-17000 2S112CB-14700 NGUYEN HOANG H&JACKIE P ROLLINS SANDRA K&JACK A 15110 SW 83RD AVE 15007 SW KENTON DR HILLSBORO,OR 97124 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 DA-03500 2S 112BC-10700 NGUYEN THANH V& SCHMIDT JANE V& VU OANH K CLARK BARBARA J& 15242 SW NCINTOSH TERR MCFALL MARY M TRUSTEES TIGARD,OR 97224 8325 SW ROSS ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CB-13200 2S112CB-00900 NIELSEN CAROLYN M SC IDT JANE V& 14910 SW KENTON DR CLA ARBARA J& TIGARD,OR 97223 MCFA MARY M TRUSTEES 8325 OSS ST TI RD,OR 97224 • • • 2S 11115A-02900 2S 111 AD-10700 SCOTT THOMAS I& WESTFALL DAVID K AND ALLISON NANCY K TINA M • 8580 SW BRAEBURN LN 15110 SW•88TH TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111AD-09900 2S112CB-14500 SERGIO U ANGEL Z& WILHELM HARALD&MARCI A ZARCO JOEL ANGEL& 14967 SW KENTON DR . • ANGEL LORENZO TIGARD,OR 97224 • 8700 SW REILLING ST • TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CB-15300 2S 111 AD-10000 SIMSHAUSER ERIK&LISA M WILLIAMSON LARRY C AND 15179 SW 84TH AVE SANDRA L TIGARD;OR 97224 8710 SW REILING TIGARD,OR 97224 • • 2S 112CB-13000 2S 111 AD-09400 SKIDMORE SHIRLEY A& WINTERS MARVIN F& QUANT RONALD E •WINTERS JOHN W 14954 SW KENTON DR 19000 SW MCCORMICK HILL RD TIGARD,OR 97224 HILLSBORO,OR 97123 2S 112CB-16100 2S 111 AD-09500 SOWERS JAMES ROBERT& WIN ERS ARVIN F& HANSEN EMILY CATHERINE WINT JOHN W 8360 SW NORFOLK LN 190 S MCCORMICK HILL RD TIGARD,OR 97223 HI SBO 0,OR 97123 2S112CB-12800 2S111AD-09600 SYMES DAVID P R WIN R ARVIN F& • 15000 SW KENTON DR WINT JOHN W TIGARD,OR 97224 190 S MCCORMICK HILL RD • HI LSBOR ,OR 97123 2S 112CB-15800 2S 111 AD-09300 TELFER CHRISTINE L WINT RS ARVIN F& 8420 SW NORFOLK CT WINT JOHN W TIGARD,OR 97224 1900 S MCCORMICK HILL RD HIL SBOR ,OR 97123 2S 11 DA :500 2S112CB-14600 TIG•C CITY OF WISE RONALD H 131 •W HALL 10598 SW NAEVE ST TI i ARD, •R 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111 AD-08900 2S1 11 AD-10200 TUCKER-MCCOY PATRICIA ANN WOODY SAMUEL T&REBECCA R 8785 SW REILING ST 8730 SW REILING ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CB-16600 Tri-Angle, LLC WARD LYN Steve Roper 8250 SW NORFOLK LN . 11290 SW Blakeney Street TIGARD,OR 97224 Beaverton, OR 97008 • • Sally Christensen CITY OF TIGARD 15685 SW 76th Avenue SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE OR 97224 is\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc Tigard, UPDATED: 7-Nov-00 Mary Ann Melvin Kristen Miller 10395 SW Bonanza Way 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Stephen Bicker Bill Finck 14235 SW 97th Avenue 9235 SW Mountain View Lane Tigard, OR.97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Mark Bogert Craig Dirksen 14445 SW 100th Avenue 9131 SW Hill Street Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Twyla Brady Paul Owen 9360 SW Edgewood Street 10335 SW Highland Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Debra Muir Rick Boyce 15065 SW 79th Avenue 7800 SW Bond Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Siebold Bob Oleson 15374 SW Thurston Lane 9023 SW Reiling Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esav Stacie Yost PO Box 230695 8465 SW Langtree Tigard, OR 97281 Tigard, OR 97224 Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt. #3 Tigard, OR 97224-3376 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 I. .-..� i V CITY of TIGARD •• ITARD „ ■,,,� rem IR. GEOGRAPNIG IN FORMA710N SYSTEM PI ■ tu tu �� 8 RD AREA NOTIFIED �' ■�■tea 500' 1 -111 e ci D < T pi c I NIII■m■■ • -■ ,- , LL — ``'•K .■ ■ ¢ FOR:Jacki Herb ■■■■■■� �■■■ ■ = I ' cn ` , .. RE. 2S 11200,17800/8421 SW Ross St. u !j VIII �_ LL�, 101 1111■ Z l � 281113008300. •■ VIOLA S•� � A MANCHA �.W [SW Ell MI� 0 1� : ICING ST, / _ Property owner information ° :sn:110 o is valid for 3 months from 4 m 1:: D09 00 !8 BC7 601 l_ �� ., i I the date printed on this map. ._ ,�h. 0093,0.r ■ ! '1I� . •009401 281120600900 • ���Q 1AD10.1 051120012500 ' A a■ . <it190o9511 221120800700 WEST 9r 91 W 21r 109610 uiliii4ItL 'ø °° zs c___,m-- SUBJECT SITE' SATTLER I I :700 LL�ti OgS 2881/00 W — mg ��, 1111■■■ ST 1 00 2. 2120818:A028'120800(00 Q 1' r ,IyI� E: SW •: y■ ��, BRAEBURN 000�S*'.0A92 00 28 .11 .?1T1T'T'Y :700 z Ern== ° ii L I 611 26n2 : t 1 12.00 ••lE: l�'�� 1-cof ■■w I.I III '.' 200=81 °�(i'il!!1 !!.Bo0 t12CB01500 F Yr �� iiifiiY co GRAVENSTIE••Z■�� • O NW1i •NE 4°° 4111511281" Y■■�■■■■��I I :I 1���'1_ 6625 mil�� ! �- � I ¢.1111■1111■. r'ITFIFITR1I�,ggpp 2 120813.00 . d.■ YYY V' .,11 sn- I I 1 1 1 ��• \\\ W a BELLFLOWER a � i 1Mrr00 I1�■■■■■■ 1111' I III \ N l �� ■■A�■ _1111- '��■ W �.,�� a ,■LJJ _� 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet S PIPPEN LN I r .■ if.IMEMOM ■.�_ IIw#I i' ` I , ■"ME�\■1111■■■EV l ■.■E� _ ..........0.6.• ,u7 ,4 s -�i4i►� \■■1111■■■ , , � al„Q A • ► ► ► ■ -',I _,` City of Tigard EMI ■m „'1,1,00. P general only`.. Information on this ma is for eneral location onl and (q ' LA G •E ' ■ should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd ••11_ T 11 ET C , , Tigard,OR 97223 ,.■■� � - A�` ,__-�- -- , I http:/SAwwv c3.aligard'or,us Community Development Plot date:Apr 23,2001;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR • • 2S 1 i 1 AD-097d0 2S 111 DA-01200 ABUKHATER MARWAN&JANET LEE CHA ERIC I&STEPHANIE W 8705 SW REILING ST 8627 SW LODI LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 11 DA-02700 2S 111 DA-03000 ADEN DAVID M&DANA M CHAGNON STACY A 8575 SW LODI LN 8585 SW BRAEBURN LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 DA-01300 2S112CB-13100 ALLEN RICHARD JAY& COOK JILLENE D DOUGLAS-ALLEN JUDY A 14932 SW KENTON DR 8605 SW LODI LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112C8-15500 2S112C8-13500 ANDERSON STEVEN J& CRAIG KEVIN R& ELIZABETH M CHERYL L 8439 SW NORFOLK CT 14852 SW KENTON DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 AD-10500 2S 111 AD-09000 BEHRENS SANDRA ROSS DICKEY RANDEE SUE 15050 SW 88TH 8775 SW REILING ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112BC-10600 2S112CB-17100 BENSON BARBARA J DOBSON MARK J& 8256 SW MATTHEW PARK ST DOMINIQUE TIGARD,OR 97224 15111 SW 83RD TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112CB-16000 25111 DA-01800 BERGER RENEA L DUGAN KELLY J&JILL C 15301 SW 84TH AVE 8602 SW LODI LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CB-08400 2S 112CB-13300 BERNHARD EDWARD A& EKBERG TIMOTHY L&LILLY M BERNHARD DIANNA 14896 SW KENTON DR 15038 SW KENTON DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111AD-10400 2S112CB-12400 BLOOM CHRISTINE M EVERHART WILLIAM W&GEORGIA A 897 NW SILVERADO DR 8145 SW ROSS ST BEAVERTON,OR 97006 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111AD-10600 2S112CB-17500 BURKE AMY E& FERGUSON KEITH LAMAR& BURKE BRIAN T CHONG 0 15080 SW 88TH AVE 15180 SW 84TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 • 2S 1'11 DA-03260 • 2S 111 DA-02600 FISCHER KENT D&PAMELA S HAUSKINS JANET MAUREEN 15212 SW MCINTOSH TERR 8591 SW LODI LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CB-08500 2S 112CB-08200 FOX JOHN NELSON&SHARON M HAWKINS JEREMY& 15050 SW KENTON DR HAWKINS MALCOLM J& TIGARD,OR 97224 HAWKINS ELAINE L 15029 SW KENTON DR PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S 11X8-16300 2S111 DA-00900 GALLINGER BENJAMIN W& HAYS LESLIE M KARL M 8601 SW BRAEBURN LN 8310 SW NORFOLK LN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112CB-16900 2S112CB-17300 GATTO MICHAEL E&JENNIFER S HENSLEY BRET H&KIMBERLY MAH 15150 SW 83RD AVE 8313 SW NORFOLK LN • TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 DA-01000 2S 111 AD-10300 GILCHRIST PAUL E&CYNTHIA J HODGSON DAVID A/GEORGANNE C 8601 SW BRAEBURN LN 8740 SW REILING ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CB-15900 2S 112CB-00500 GOEDJEN DON& HOGGAN RICHARD E/GAYLE A GOEDJEN WES 15233 SW 81ST AVE 12755 SW 69TH AVE#100 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112CB-15700 2S11 CB-00600 HA CU XUAN& HOG N ICHARD E/GAYLE A LE HANG THI 15233 81ST AVE 8450 NW NORFOLK CT TI RD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CB-14400 2S111AD-10800 HALDEMAN MARK R& HOGUE BRIAN C HALDEMAN JENNIFER C 15140 SW 88TH AVE 14943 SW KENTON DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 AD-06300 2S 111 AD-09200 HAMBACH CATHALEEN TRUSTEE HONE JEFFREY JOHN&ADELE F 14815 SW HALL BLVD 8755 SW REILING ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CB-17900 2S 112CB-13400 HAMPTON COURT OWNERS OF JANSEN DANA L LOTS 3-8 14874 SW KENTON DR 12755 SW 69TH AVE STE 100 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • • 2S111DA 102400 2S112CB-00700 JEDAN MICHAEL E& MANGOLD STEVEN R&DEBRA E HEIRONIMUS BETH A 8275 SW ROSS ST 8574 SW LODI LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 , 2S112CB-08300 2S112CB-08600 JORDAHL JAMES L& MARTIN LISA M OCKENFELS-JORDAHL CATHERINE A 15072 SW KENTON DR 15016 SW KENTON DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 DA-03100 2S 111 DA-03300 KARIMZADEH MANOUCHEHR& MASTERSON MARK A&DEBORAH L GHORBAN FARIBA 15222 SW MCINTOSH TER 8571 SW BRAEBURN LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 DA-02800 2S112CB-16200 KAYSER MARK E& MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORP KIMBERLY J 12755 SW 69TH AVE 8572 SW BRAEBURN LN STE#100 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 AD-09100 2S112CB-16400 LARSEN JULIE ANN MA RIX t VELOPMENT CORP 8765 SW REILING ST 1275' :W 69TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 ST ,1 TI ARD, •R 97223 2S112CB-12900 2S112CB-16500 LAYMAN DEVIN F& M TRI EVELOPMENT CORP ARMSTRONG JIA 127 W 69TH AVE 14976 SW KENTON DR ST 0' TIGARD,OR 97224 T AR ,OR 97223 2S112CB-15600 2S112CB-16700 LUNGO CHRIS& M TRI DEVELOPMENT CORP LAUREN 12 SW 69TH AVE 8443 SW NORFOLK CT S 00 TIGARD,OR 97224 IGAR ,OR 97223 2S111DA-02300 2S112CB-17 00 LUTES DAVID M&NADIE A MATRIX EVELOPMENT CORP 8577 SW BELLFLOWER ST 12 5 69TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 STE 100 TI AR ,OR 97223 2S112CB-12500 2S112CB-16800 LUTTER STEPHAN G& M TRI EVELOPMENT CORP KELLIE S 12 SW 69TH AVE 15033 SW 81ST AVE ST 0 PORTLAND,OR 97224 T GAR ,OR 97223 2S112CB-08700 2S112CB-17 00 MACDANOLD MARGARET A& MA RIX EVELOPMENT CORP MACDANOLD MILDRED V 127 W 69TH AVE 15094 SW KENTON DR STE 0 TIGARD,OR 97224 TI AR ,OR 97223 • • 2S112C6- 5260 2S112CB-14900 M TRI DEVELOPMENT CORP OREGON DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 127 SW 69TH AVE FINANCIAL SERVICES ST 0 355 CAPITOL ST NE RM 434 TI ARD,OR 97223 SALEM,OR 97301 2S1 11 DA-00800 2S 112CB-17200 M TRIX EVELOPMENT CORP PHILLIPS PERPETUA M 127 5 W 69TH AVE 15151 SW 83RD AVE ST 00 TIGARD,OR 97224 TI AR ,OR 97223 2S112CB-15400 2S112CB-13600 MATRI EVELOPMENT CORP PITTMON BRADLEY J&LAURIE G 12 W 69TH AVE 14830 SW KENTON DR ST 00 TIGARD,OR 97224 T GAR ,OR 97223 2S112C8-17700 2S 111 DA-02500 M TRIX VELOPMENT CORP PLATTER M PHILLIP& 12 5 W 69TH AVE DEANNE K ST 0 8590 SW LODI LN T GAR ,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112C8-1 00 2S 111 DA-03600 M TRI EVELOPMENT CORP RANOA FRANCIS A&EDNA S 127 SW 69TH AVE 15310 SW MCINTOSH TER S # 0 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 AD-09800 2S 111 DA-03400 NEJAD KAZEM KN&SALARI MARZEI REYNOLDS LUCIA&ROBERT 14473 SW 134TH 15230 SW MCINTOSH TER TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 DA-01100 2S 111 AD-10100 NGUYEN HENRY H& RIJKEN TODD W& YUEN CHIU-KUEN CARSLEY KENLYNN E 8600 SW BRAEBURN LN 8720 SW REILING ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CB-17000 2S112CB-14700 NGUYEN HOANG H&JACKIE P ROLLINS SANDRA K&JACK A 15110 SW 83RD AVE 15007 SW KENTON DR HILLSBORO,OR 97124 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111DA-03500 2S112BC-10700 NGUYEN THANH V& SCHMIDT JANE V& VU OANH K CLARK BARBARA J& 15242 SW NCINTOSH TERR MCFALL MARY M TRUSTEES TIGARD,OR 97224 8325 SW ROSS ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CB-13200 2S112CB-00900 NIELSEN CAROLYN M SC IDT JANE V& 14910 SW KENTON DR CLA ARBARA J& TIGARD,OR 97223 MCFA MARY M TRUSTEES 8325 OSS ST TI RD,OR 97224 • • . 2S 111 DA-02900 2S 111 AD-10700 SCOTT THOMAS I& WESTFALL DAVID K AND ALLISON NANCY K TINA M 8580 SW BRAEBURN LN 15110 SW 88TH TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111AD-09900 2S112CB-14500 SERGIO U ANGEL Z& WILHELM HARALD&MARCI A ZARCO JOEL ANGEL& 14967 SW KENTON DR ANGEL LORENZO TIGARD,OR 97224 8700 SW REILLING ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CB-15300 2S 111 AD-10000 SIMSHAUSER ERIK&LISA M WILLIAMSON LARRY C AND 15179 SW 84TH AVE SANDRA L TIGARD,OR 97224 8710 SW REILING TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CB-13000 2S 111 AD-09400 SKIDMORE SHIRLEY A& WINTERS MARVIN F& QUANT RONALD E WINTERS JOHN W 14954 SW KENTON DR 19000 SW MCCORMICK HILL RD TIGARD,OR 97224 HILLSBORO,OR 97123 2S 112CB-16100 2S 111 AD-09500 SOWERS JAMES ROBERT& WIN ERS •-ARVIN F& HANSEN EMILY CATHERINE WINT:' JOHN W 8360 SW NORFOLK LN 19010 S. MCCORMICK HILL RD TIGARD,OR 97223 HI 5B0'0,OR 97123 2S 112CB-12800 2S1 11 AD-09600 SYMES DAVID P R WIN R ARVIN F& 15000 SW KENTON DR WINT S JOHN W TIGARD,OR 97224 190 S MCCORMICK HILL RD HI LSBOR ,OR 97123 2S 112CB-15800 2S 111 AD-09300 TELFER CHRISTINE L WINT RS ARVIN F& 8420 SW NORFOLK CT WINT JOHN W TIGARD,OR 97224 1900 S MCCORMICK HILL RD HIL SBOR ,OR 97123 2S 11 DA 500 2S112CB-14600 TIG CITY OF WISE RONALD H 1312 W HALL 10598 SW NAEVE ST TI 'ARD, R 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111AD-08900 2S111AD-10200 TUCKER-MCCOY PATRICIA ANN WOODY SAMUEL T&REBECCA R 8785 SW REILING ST 8730 SW REILING ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 • 2S112CB-16600 WARD LYN 8250 SW NORFOLK LN TIGARD,OR 97224 • • • Sally Christensen CITY OF TIGARD 15685 SW 76th Avenue SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 97224 is\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc UPDATED: 7-Nov-00 Mary Ann Melvin Kristen Miller 10395 SW Bonanza Way 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Stephen Bicker Bill Finck 14235 SW 97th Avenue 9235 SW Mountain View Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Mark Bogert Craig Dirksen 14445 SW 100th Avenue 9131 SW Hill Street Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Twyla Brady Paul Owen 9360 SW Edgewood Street 10335 SW Highland Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Debra Muir Rick Boyce 15065 SW 79th Avenue 7800 SW Bond Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Siebold Bob Oleson 15374 SW Thurston Lane 9023 SW Reiling Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esav Stacie Yost PO Box 230695 8465 SW Langtree Tigard, OR 97281 Tigard, OR 97224 Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt. #3 Tigard, OR 97224-3376 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Receipt #: 27200100000000001711 __..w/_... Date: 04/24/2001 T I D E M A R K COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due RECEXP Recovered Expenditures(labels)-35.0000 @$1.00 100-0000-479000 $35.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Check MATRIX CORPORATION 0 24256 0 $35.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $35.00 • SENT BY: 'MATRIX DEVELOPMENT; 5035988900; APR-23-01 12:53; PAGE 2/4 • • CITY OF TIGARD - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION Ctt1fOfno'R° • 13125 SW MALI. BOULEVARD • c����'�� .S�+iglt Commranry TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX 503-684-7297(Attu Petry or Shift/Planning) • R[E!V[ T FOR 5t10- FOOT PROPERTY OWNER. MAILING. UST ______________ Property owner infon nation is valid-for 3 months from the date of your request. INDICATE ALL PROJECT fAP,&TAXIOT NUM BS (r.e. IS134AB,Tax tot 00100)OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW and INCLUDE A MAP OFALL LOTS FOR THE PROJECT (preferably assessor's tax map): L0 c- N v.rvpie n O ur t -- 2. S I.O 12 G B J'i$Oa (r3 Yz. s P oS s Si .J i. / C t3- f 7 1% INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTINp 2 OR 3 SETS OF LABELS: . 2 (NOTE: A.minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided to place on your 2.sets of envelopes that applicants are required to submit at the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood meeting is required and Ou have not yet Geld that meeting. you should request 3 sets) NAME Of CONTACT PERSON: - i K t-+-e PHONE: c so3)(o 20 .8ce,0 CA t • 2-4A This request may be mailed, faxed, or !land delivered to the City of Tigard. -Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion oij your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request in "Will Call" by their last name, at the Corftmunity Development Reception Desk. i • The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OIL ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAIUNG LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description; i • S I I to generate the mailing fist,plus$2 per sheep for printing the list onto labels(20 addresses per.sheet). Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets'requested. *EXAMPLE* i * * COST FOR THIS REQUEST * * sheets of labels x S2/sheet = $8.00 x,L sets 4 $16.00 SSS sheet(s) of labels x SI/sheet = S U x � sets L.sheets of labels x S2/sheet for UT area z Z sets S 4.00 I sheets) of labels x S2/sheet for GT area = 102 x- sets GENERATE UST SLI.Ifq "AERATE = TOTAL. �4•.uu TOTAL = - 535 SENT BY: MATRIX DEVELOPMENT; • 5035988900; APR-2,301 12:52; PAGE 1 .[Legend Homes Matrix Development Legenc Real Estate Services Legend Mortgage 12 '55 5W 69th Ave, Ste. 100 Portlanc#, OR 97223 'hone; 503-620-8080 ! Fax: 503-598-8900 CCB# 60563 FAX COVER SHEET Date: 4 • 23 •°ti To: �.�t-i,� a Sti-+:�ley /ph=m-,; .1g From: • Kt-0o Fax: so I Number of pages including cover sheet; 4 Message: SENT BY: MATRIX DEVELOPMENT; • 5035988900; APR-2E101 12:53; PAGE 3/4 . r ' • NCirs MID PLAT_RE57RCTIQND: '.1•a ammo.am. .ta.Odra rAraaaca,trll11R7s1°.!4 HAMPTON COURT PLAT BOOK /21 k,. 1 74.11 0904._°.�R ROW..9 XL LP,WI. .0.141.aun..o ew PAGE .ra iw.i fide RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. um s1.2 1 sr'z :�W. M wee ...e. REPEAT OF >,OT'S 0. 10 AND A PORTION.OF LOT 9 _ _ w.a Mb MINA.10.OW he.14..M141(L'•1��0+�40'a•Ir°t.as sea0 i PEAT OF .Cr000 ACRES 1� •-T - ' ... �,,�� 4•1 w.er•.•w a r.cma ro aw•.4s•T>-.•.o 4.404,.ten 4+1••�+aar.W*4 n�Ar.a.W a.r•f�r..rry ...1)45.71 0f-L A .10 AC ,1 i-■ a um",9.07 c.cw•r..r rr.•wa aL,.,44,40 44,a°,44.4 IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 12 r: rr:+v: = rrsc,7L�4i:a 4444 i�-oal+am.;y,9ro4. ..944.9 LARRY a e TERM re.rwev.a T. 2 S.• R. 1 W. WB,LAMETTE MERIDIAN a.is=zna 7`:-ami?ifr-unr'>,, u°arraac.o■0gawonw.ra�n..raa.. w ..wdsa..a.ar. CITY OF TIGARD r.•�rrr�aa*-r! + +uatra, ,nor....•.4t oow,.a.vans.con w a r.°r.a.m 11 maia.�aa-rv�i'.���OIY�IS^�rfT. �)� .wa.wn•.r♦.•R u r b WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON 17.f.�r-;:vr�r�ar`r�-�-�+ rr�o0�>ioinWar v�..r un■.-a.i.a.w..4....•o,+a 4onrrr.mu.R SU/AVM r1EW/11Y 17.7000 s,-rr �a�r:RTaT-,-4--cst,vi ,40.,44 r�*rrarr.ra.-rr-rs�.sr ,,.u.n ewr./RA/ET ro..4v..A n 1 tir.1.77:711. s'L'••:ai'�-a am-a�0,.:1rri�'a ..o} ••nw.Naa.jruya.oV.CCRa vii rr. AWRY r n..•aus°as,. J r.r.,ca rl'.�.r w. .9 190.11197747 COAT,ana..rya.- YiT71■t1'i;::J .r*rra .i 1 r.r�Pw • talc,ro ma•rR 000,ora No wt•vs ROMP..v 41•7 !rv^>f •,• � xt-ai 0a • SC7L'aa.T 7ar.. Ii21'. A rr.uau. aa1TA-MT- �1.MC:::,.1...S•:�afr' Hilt'.. •f 4 ,�ie XI �o ra 1 OmICAl10° fa�.�1':r'.1. J.: ar.•� :'•t�i'iJ .. w w r.i ===.0.7.9111g1 oR .COY , h tia.1�a1Mb 444_4. - i 1A A. IBC {C■.N0.11A) ■I .._-_..-.. i��T1r -Jr'Ta .J .. M Via.... 1 Alm_ r-.-_, s7.a __,e r=rree • :lalarrV 51720 a ..TJ'wR •.ir scar": 0,•7'01 rx-rr['r•=:Riranta --'- iHw7.-. .. -yi4-r•ar-r"a rr :r7 10oc{7•M"� .Q w� .... I:1�°Y- i�•��ri .., mr w •las Naps- 1' _ CT...'� l �.-^rarr rams r•.:r. p _ 6 _ a�_n-r:rsr�x-004,-0-r crrrr.� R.sr - i Smo botmrr b• PIP. - ,,,.!*.r___,. .. "-.. . �I '1)'i�`C: ar__ rr+-•a rv'a'!� tY t.L.il v '-� \ •a r- C017.'r . +1 I.'E f� l Jart<a attrSr�:lr•. -risra aJni}YT7 �/ I .4/400.0 I I IR■°'°' 'I • ogLgC _ avra.._T:r7c-r• _ _ u 4 X17:, �J_ sa 9 a.l�*dcf�. ,.. I.I�`Ill 1I :'0106,4 4.05. LCr32+¢ ,p t\'• ih .t}}..- .:a:. 71 -.o•.w �: . _ r.0y auae..b" �,,: ���... *40 1 4u Lf >.,,4 rIfNN71-e va ..Iw yu� ,�• ♦._.;,IN i.f+ef II r.�a... .. oo.o mar03.c.a., 4 • I II Mr+' M - MMt mar u¢m rr°wr it �•.' M.a �. 6 lV �1�, I' la. b 91 i�e 4 A I N•�f.. Na°fi.aKUrM ur ■ e M •, 'v a.:. �'. 7.\7! .. ;. 'Q 14...4'r✓w �, ry.1. 1Y •• 7 1 -e�ilmvV'm qqW� 'I r.Ml U r���•.ti r`.`.aaF`^ `. ie`ry.-„A 1,.. 1 __ I, , _1 f .�1., +Me - •WKaf r■u.ri re wa awe:.w. CI wr ier 1L� ♦ .` _ a ... -.r �aI(=- / .7.7101"aw•/l m.4 a�l9!7/V1 M. •f• ra,., .i r'.r •i'C IIWOV v....op `• rwwu 0041 '.. 4444 •aQ •- • _ - .:.iLI • 1E0 0110, e4.406.. /1 "1r`:aa.t 0,4x0.n;-"*141'.,.w• - - .a>L.L- -,,: - I «'w�wi``al■�o.� / -4.a 4444+ 1 O O.1 II Z � 1 �.° - l hr • - vane.),wi..r,b sam I 11. r 1..4 :0 r �n� _ :y II a.:a:.RP ...I `� 44.44.l ,i 1 .m. '` "` .'....r.•■4.� 11 Iam y� r� i � 0,4:01. 04u. - 4a. I O • 'emTaw.. ■ _ sar. - 001900.wan ahra�w ba• aq �• Y., sad z f0a nrsi't■-rr SSW• IOW i Ma �1� p tt a T n • or .:cor.ac• � • 1 4 Y.Ofyyr.anLff ' a r a .m .A wr = g. MITE.wmra- b ro II ...Inca mov ` to'- ori:rr1y V 1 .��::°T., I .�i I r a 1 wo•_ar.n..w ,w 7 Lv R,aLr °a1r 001rf f ti.an*P.aM 9•4111T 100 xir,wy v'* ssxw 7 L -A•s.'C°i:w.;yC:- a w.ta ur 'a•NT°oa•r7 w0 7- iaC�- r M,a.r oO •a•,Y.m Y. as rao uta j"r G ..)�\ I , •,y.4 .e I • •9 r•ii4i weir 1 a a 04.0501 K6..... .. _.. t 4515 MO.woo* 0301.0.15 et.moon*reek I .1•9919.11 /` ao°rT:c cosaa / tallON DIK...S Vi r� i �� s .. MO ;0M. ,44."; • a� 4 444.w I SANS I.-i0 • • .111.....r50 PACE t CF 3 • . SENT BY: MATRIX DEVELOPMENT; • 5035088000; • APR-2 -01 12:53; PAGE 4/4 • • , , ••-• --------•--- _......... • , • , . 2S 1 12C9 2S 1 12CB ' . • • •110 .,.... ........,•::....:..sy.::.........7.1; j..•• .;..........,'.4,...,f,..„. ., s= ),•:•,■T-1.-■L4 4 L.---...2.1.4' .11..e...4,.1:f:1,:•t•i: ,..k4.) , ...i,, I.•11,-;,-).•,44,,,?:ril :,. c' ..' ''''., wr-'4...1-7tiliLwraV,Zjut ST 8 k . . • ••'.'4::;::''. ' ."2 T.'4.1. • J tiud4,••• - 1 -.• ..•Iii!Tr...• •.,I rizr.,, i , . . • 1. t ,. i• i• ',. .. P, ..4'•Arl.• , • •••,,:.; • • " -^•--"""-"l•-••"•r -40 *Fuk•.•1-1:-*.;•,,v.it .7,....-4,4„........,...._,..a.,.... ft,/..•Ji47•••• ''.; ,1-. ,I,..:...;::-.:"...s•-•,. • ,-.. ,••;.*: b I g ,!..`••0 ,' • .7 ••.i .• . i r6................_a. '„ I' 1,5 I N., <0 - . . 4 T. li ,. •,L,.,•:", ----.- - _ ,.... - ..,....... .. '.,V'(.7tWA.:LTT74.;:...!..i:.: 1 - -I"- 1 1' \ -. ...,• ."......;.4..' • • ,.,..6..0..'. ... ... -'." • 4..7. r•,-.7 ,::..:-.-:••.••,•••• '..•;.::: :.••••.' "..,.*,,.. - • ....• ..,, WASIIINOTON cOLINTY12PILOON !:!••',....tr V.'.:'"''''''.:':1. . • . l, ' ... . i 6AV114 SY/1/4 SECTION 12 Ta3111161/WAN. 1.,tr 6, . )11,14,. •, 1 1 2' / SCJU.I 1'-100' e' ..• '. ..'• i .1.--- ... 28-74 ,!-; .ir- ii ...,- 1,.'...: .:.'") -7. , t , LIR A.t. 0 •P.4 A.f.;ft.43..:4f.•0. . AK ..■ '., 44' .....1.1‘... .. . • • 1 IIM.• t .... L q \ . • :•'...... .....•• N•-... ,.. - 4..7%'4.,:v....4:,..:.....-.7,4,.. ....... .,....„....7.,,,-:!, -"?'•'..-is.''".•"-. "'• • • •..w•""I stl" " % - fe••• .'":•,. :..•,iis ,.••••• (....r. !.i.„;:!,.'..,‘,..*••••,...! ‘4. .4.; 17'12zr• 1, zxr••• .,CZ.1g: tcn12aer ) ,..., -t 0,1..2'-^055 _• , • •f•-Skigg•.......! . - :-..• •••''' :. ....' ...• .. f•ii..A1,A ....1...Ok 0,..:1E11,'1, : .:"..‘,.- •.. -•'..e.':/z, .. .,4, t,*? , 9,- . ,.VIM:, WY • ..ic .....,-61*4-; •••••••„..,.. T2... .. ., H.,' .:'2.'......._..1;4!•`':..- '' V * d A.? ,fr•,17,16,,,,.. nr,,rf., u. i . •.., 4 A" " '% \•' t•Es-„-,1.... -^1 , 4,t; 4,, ..<4.'.:.•... „r, .1.„ 4 ,,r, ,.: • .1 m. g . aM Lil xl.dr 'ree 14 al 1, ,..:;■77.41i... ..:.:.7.,..:,.,„t..,...,itt.- • (7.1 ....... 1.,,,gt•";:g.40,.1‘....,:,hit.... ;I's 4"....r'•1 r.... ".T■", : : ....... . : 711 - - '•••37‘ -t--.; - a •.•. .:•:.•:•••••':‘• . ./ :z4.:*151MLIM .....'. •"'■•••d•••■,11'•..ifn .f5..e4;i0, t. IA't.. ''001 • •C.€.6.,rig4 1:41/1 . .. - 1%••%••••••••• .... .. :••S ;12'ESEEM3E1.*•/ ''.21".44•• 'V.••:•.1, ;•/'1.1 00'VI,' ..1 '% %%•. . ..._II 4 N.,,.,.., Dirk.• '.) ./ .41 _•::•_-------%, 'L-AILLE ." ••.;„:.f • ,. -. 4.....1.„.,•;,.. -,.:,.3,,, -.-•,,0 -•.„;•.-,--, . - ,.7., C'''-*".'''' o):''• '-' I ;L 4::744,c-rs,-4,-ra.,.,co • sw NoaFoLK NE Vi., 4,n,C.) . T.." -; ■ICII 1 4. .4.' ea...,•. • ... .4ma.. . 110/1 ADO171014U.MAPS VMJT OM W1111717 AT .efL4,1 MI 41. pit • ..Z...,...7, .• •...-•.: --„..-.0,....." • - •'• , -cr.. 7,. :i• '- trro4'•rsZa•;6gqqc 5 A e-iii.-.-47-',- , , ',xi ....,_, .,,•5 4?,• .,.; „ ..ii . i r 4 g"rz, I. I tt :ID.'" N% cr-■m'''ll EE • ''.. i ' fIt•-•"•••1•.....9 ..."46-1••• •--'•:•-•a- ..z. -' 5.16-h...1......-, I I.i. .....lki Lai,;ggvanl• ...,•.•••!In• •,. - 1-32 ••••• ' ■ • ....''',...',,•••:'1-••••--■••,21-t4frai.---.32.,,;'m.,'"idat• -arai..-.....,'• ,Lei4,-,,•:. L.....isys...,,,,•4,....4...': •::-,"••2.• : : '"•,:'':i J ...,1,1*Vilira 016.06,IMO t16.6,16100i.610041&XI VI 1760i,MOO naca 064 ma 1*160 t •••• . •• •.•..••..•.... •,.. .... .. . . LANE ' X L-d.: '•• . Id. man ,..,.rk)'-""'' ''''11 - "" ,,,"L"12'h , I",.2F Mg 'Wit..r K.: e.. (..1311°211 VI lirk4-„h.., ett.t."••;.=iii rt"4:E, nzri. =.3... ,..,...v•,!....w.....,y,„„_[4:0.4 .„.4 ft ■;.,, A 1 .1- rj, 1.1 L.; 1 ..‘... k.i.e4 . . .• •. • .. •. .. .!,...,. , . . scryaiv.t.? •-.. - , •,•al;...„. .,i L„,..4r. ,..1„,,,,,,, 2 4 6 SW ! KENTON ' AN.•• (At. Nc• •-•4.'Is' ' , DRIVE t • .1, IT •• ,.;-.4'• _..: .• ..•.. • '...y "•r r)-, . . . -4, ... ,,, e•-... ....-,...;-,1...I 66••- .. I-1.-•_.., LANE g • 'f'.str..c Z si nt', • "....Sq' 't••• ! :.. 1 '-r ''''. ... '.7 ''' 44% 4:..- ' '''" • i.e4-7" :114't 4!"'T0.1. •Cg%P.' 2.6!...,•ILI ,,, F•tc.ay it 24) ‘/Z ..i.i,MS01.7•:104,;:i 1 .47;ir;I irli mil,,,,,,.,il.1,,e,g;_ 4: / 'I.' II ':,jr 11: N.22X '2.2:''14 ''• '•'1'd', I .-- , --- ' "'f- *: ''0 s'Ir• .*1 Z‘4-illitalL !, .....,. .......--...... ..-.. '.: ;:::-t. 1. . 1 1 r 11600 I NM vl I tax* 4.: '.. .1 ca t' • ..r.,'•g Do ....•,v,.• .‘,.•.•1L4F?''' V_:01,..4 Is W"-•.'":.••-•1•1•,..!'.":Ir'...r.;--1,2.-,..?-a_-..-!1 -T -,,.. -_ , i! .,. .., ..at 2,,,..,. ;:-, _ .•itir,:;e-,,,,,' ti; ,',40;-1.'1.,:;..,A "'"".""'"'6'"2Ca •.r.-Tr"L'':.,., -6:2°'(5;:‘ •,•„„,.•,-•.N.,r,r ,...ir g:.., WM 1 .,,,..,,,,,dr 3.; ivi 21 1r i I lt, l• woo i, Pi .11. ffl.,.., V ee.:A„..., „.m.,..., 32±•,...,...........easame I. 7.....1....,,,,,%;,...'-,v. ..... 4kt,4'2' .• -. ' ... %7 I "1 ''',. 7 7••'''D -.1(, :.,... II 4-2 ":1 i Pl7i'llip."-••/, ... •" .•••••• f ;1 ''..°"%co.. .' • -• • TO I ',...:,, ..., .. ,..:.,...,..:::.■ _,,... .,.- ,., 5 T X\Ictetkire. 4,,,,, . f,....‘'‘, •'Tr ,7 1: 4 J 7: II 11° t g 1 're re.•461,r °-, 71-.‘•..,•-'t."'.-e.■•• ...:;. ...... i .., _, , _.... . . . .'•'• :• • ..• .' .•,•'' .4.Z111.4514"'" .r lyzr t 4,1," i 1.','41 'ir,, r • mg . . .. .. . ,,•. ..•:. : •• .- ...., , ! •,• .; •s.,, , .,„ .,9 : ',9,g=-- - — -, • ,,,,- - -A- -,- ..,,,--,„ • • .:6-.„4. g;..20.4 FM J*.,4 i ' r,7•••ii 1200I 1.01:Iri: ' .■ "40•. V"...:: ,n 1.; /1 -4-, t 7 ',.. 5 It? ? -• ....z.,. c. ft.„,,. - ...-_,,,.,..:-,, . . . Irst.• i.., i.. ....;,,,..• 11/61.ci. , _.6,16 y ..,.... s, 8_ .... r. _6.0. .1 W 4 ...- 41- ,...,if, - •Is4("M•11.. Ft.• j&110( CI • .... sou I 911°.° L wr,' ,4,... , _ „1.•!••••:;:.; -,14,4...I..,„•4.1,4,,N.,:i, 4•F;;::..3.)• '.. . I.3...er_,. a c..naux.,reasw'r ow •-•-.7 ,-.-,.;,,,7 • - -- , , • ,.....! ,-• , , •. I • . • - ..., •.. ••••••■-• • •• . l'14;s•• 114,N041 "A° .17.. 2 ../STREPT a .. ...• • •...- ... •• 4 ,i...;., ,a-7...4,...,7i... •,..., • 4,,. 40411,1-■••,- .1 g. _., , vat _ -.....- 1 PLOT DATE:kgs•rch 2g,2001 . . ' 1, 4 - 0,0 i 1 '1.0 a• .1 SOS S •:'• .•,'.. i • '.:lir;•,e;•,a,,,r.t... ''... (211.1.5 ••4. 14 t .. A.. I" • •V ..t..% '..13,147.Prt...:4tri'llarlilSii.,, "(Nfc'fir/S77;411Y ONE FOR 01040 Mr- ., • •• „•••-••,•"b...-7.14 .f.f. .• _ _ I ASHFORD a pi c) 2 .,,:,.s. .vx..ti ... ,.....;,.,,, y1_,,..Ii,Ake 1.Piff,L.I. ....W.:=4:4 II..ore.,•••■•••■=.= . . • . „ . . 4 .• '17' /1 r,',041"441'at”k.ari,a fe"-riTfi,'1.111.11,,,,n, .,911 ve Ir V :-.-....,..,1111........ .• •. 21.....•..•.2..• •k•.••' :;•'.c... , . 4 • ...,c. ••.' .•.1 ........... • ' 131.1;htrek4"nel.2...2•7g*,.< -..c.,/1.34.4k"C'''AZ461.!ft A rif.ta..--.,•'esh.!-..,,fm 1 tr....LI*,......,,.., ' ,-,...1111.1. :••••:i• ,- *••:•••• • .•> •' ••••••:.• •.- , ••.•••• •••.•••,.. • -• o• .141P,T4-7- tirceitt,r.sive, - Itur.,.;,-6.0.01:. ....... • is. ••• .• •• •: •,•• •-•••• •,., • .- • •• • • • • • '4''''''..."'"... ' TIGARD •• • •2g't i 7(14 1C 1 • , , . . I ' I I 1 • ; . • I ; . I • 1 ; . : • i • ■ ; I I I I Routing Order: Surveyor: JRH Development Review Engineer BR 11-444f-C31-1 FINAL PLAT REVIEW CHECKLIST Cam. NAP Zoot -man Plat Name: 12CPEirtftion Case Number(s): MLP 2000 — Address/Location: d f-'5 / Contact name and phone: Kevin Williams @ G8L, (503) 641-0308 Date Received: 10/18/01 Date Forwarded to City Surveyor: 10/18/01 SURVEY SECTION Check if Check if Considered Okay 1. Street alignment and width, continuity h)A ❑ 2. Curve, corner, cul-de-sac radii [ 1'/)4 ❑ 3. Dedication, vacation, easement conveyance : [� 4. Residential Survey Certificate match the map ❑✓f ❑ • 5. Two Monument Ties to City GPS [� ❑ Comments: ore idear;Al tyPPci ' 7 0 & P 3 Pa;M.S. By: 56 � i D- y: A .:� / z2 - 0l Surveyor's Signatde Date • Page 1 of 1 �teg■pd•devVOflT -plat.dot Revision date:1/1/01 Routing Order: 1. Current Planning: Matt S 2. Building Plans Examiner Bob T 3. Engineering Tech I Kit 4. Development Review Engineer BR FINAL PLAT REVIEW CHECKLIST 1.1 `c-e-- QialZTi'f�1 t-��-6� 2�t-000a Plat Name: ZiliwirdwPartition Case Number(s): likiMMEEIENFEL Date Received: 10/18/01 Date Forwarded to Current Planning: 10/18/01 Planner: Matt Scheidegger Planning Division Check if Check if Considered Okay 1. Phase boundaries [O 2. Lot and/or tract size and configuration 3. Lot numbers 0� 4. Access restrictions, reserve strips [[✓]� 5. Condition of Approval Satisfied ❑ 6. Public & Private streets (location, width, etc....,) ❑ ❑ 7. Preliminary Plat approval date - 1 yr period OK ❑ ❑ 8. Special Deed Restrictions (CC&R's) ❑ ❑ 9. Open Space (Deed or Dedication) ❑ ❑ 10.SPECIAL SETBACKS ARE Other Comments: Need to MEer �-li%�.l_, � d co►,c);4-;o - and kJo7a O1,1 t �4� By: Z'ecase.,&4_ /a J o Planner's Signature Dat FORWARDED TO BUILDING DIVISION: /O}�D3/0) ['fate Page 1 of 3 henplpiwdeWor sVifpaLdot Revision date:1/1/01 BUILDING DIVISION Comments: li By: 159 - 0 - Building Dept. Signature Date FORWARD TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (Attn.: Engineering Tech/Engineering Records) Date ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (Engineering Tech) Check if Okay Street Names Acceptable Assign Address(es) ©� oar Address Fee : o lots @ $30.00/lot = $ a„ Update City-wide maps Comments: % . By: � .f /v7 6 Engineering Tech's Signature ate FORWARDED TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ENGINEER Date Page 2 of 3 ttdglp tv deNformSW-plat.dot Revision date:1/1/01 Returned to Surveyor for Correction BY: -- DATE: ll(Z--tn) A6 r,kj zo S- 1 ,22.cN Vait.-1 kof Fax to County Surveyor: "OK to review" BY: DATE:$ kk Is:4 Corrections Reviewed and Approved BY: a— DATE: I 1 `Flo Z Forwarded for City S' natures BY: 'M- b pounini f. AA r e-- 4 DATE: 1' 102 0 Copy of Signed Plat Made and Put in File BY: DATE: Released to Developer for Recording BY: DATE: Authorize Eng. Tech Ito release addresses BY: DATE: Copy of Signed Plat to Permit Techs BY: DATE: Lognote: OK to take in building permit apps. BY: DATE: Page 3 of 3 trergrprnrdevIo TnslfhFptatdot Revision date:1/1/01 SR Design « RECEIVED PLANNING Engineering—Planning—Surveying OCT 19 2001 Transmittal CITY Of TIGARD To: City of Tigard From: Steve Roper Attn: Brian Rager Date: October 19, 2001 Address: Job No.: 00-503 13125 SW Hall Blvd. CC: - Tigard, OR 97223 Phone: (503) 639-4171 . For Your: ✓ Review & Comment ❑ As Requested ❑ Information & File Via: ❑ Mail ✓ Messenger ❑ Fed-Ex Number Copies Description 1 2 More copies of Hampton's lot 27 Plat • Comments: Here are the other 2 copies of Hampton Plat. If you need anything else,please giv- me a call. i Si. /Shined: ;d A ,- //1 r- , 11290 SW Bi keney Stria. • Beavert: OR 97008 (503)469-1213 • (503)296-2068 • steve.srdesign@vedzon.net DECEIVED PLANNING \.T" � OCT 18 2001 Transmittal : � CITY OF TIGARD Job No.: 22-5-2 Date: /0 /a -O To: C rr'y OF I !G.&R—b om: Attn: G & L Land Surveying, Inc. 8116 SW Nimbus Ave. Beaverton, OR 97008 Phone: (503)641-0308 Fax: 671-0877 Phone: Fax: Project/ Subject: As Requested For Your Info. For Your Approval For Your Review Return Requested Item Copies Date Description 2- A-414r7dov CT /R..7-)77 ,■„) PL-47 Comments: Co w P y Ii0S" A- -�5 �o die, py , , �- - c) (60fr. L pl�d �N (tlemtad S LR A4LPZoot - OOOO9 MA P Eta C 0 NOTES AND PLAT RESTRICTIONS: PARTITION PLAT NO 2001 .. ', 1.) PARCELS 1 AND 2 ARE SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PER THE CITY < � � SUBDIVISION CROWN� ��3>ae o012�1- AND CITY OF :7GAR0 RECORDED AS DOCUMENT N 0. > � � � L CNI 2.) THERE SHALL BE NO DIRECT MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS TO OR FROM S.W. ROSS -- STREET FROM PARCELS 1 OR 2 UNLESS AUTHORIZED BY THE GOVERNING BODY D I HAVING JURISDICTION OF SAID ROAD. A PORTION BEING A REPLAT O LOT 27, aw.) . 3.) PARCELS 1 AND 2 ARE SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 2000-023569, WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS. HAMPTON COURT Q vii TIC COORDINATES: LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST 1 /4 OF ' NAD 83 (91) SECTION 12 T. 2 S., R. 1 W. W.M. SEE C D FACTOR: 0.99189728 > , POINTS 06 .OW CITY QF TI GARD •Ct COORDINATES PROVIDED FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD GIS PURPOSES ONLY AND • DO NOT CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS AS DEFINED IN O.R.S. CHAPTER 93.360. WASHIN G TO N COU N TY, OREGON • ...I �''� SCALE: 1" = 30' ® SURVEYED: SEPTEMBER 6, 2001 .....,1 ( ® N 634965.6733 N 634970.4747 E 7620982.1190 LEGEND: z ' E 7620699.5497 N89•20'10"E 282.60' O - DENOTES SET 5/8" X 30" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW " PLASTIC CAP MARKED G & L LAND SURVEYING, INC. 63.02' IP...- _ _ \ 219.58' ,/ ¢�3O.p0' O.DO+ - " 20' ACCESS EASEMENT / , C4 R *'2 • DENOTES FOUND 5/8 IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP Q " / 15 + Co" MARKED "G & L LAND SURVEYING, INC." (FROM SN 28720) ty on (SEE NAIL A BELOW) \ 1O• 1 �'' I \ �4 191 • - DENOTES FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC '20'10 E '' ', ! CAP MARKED "WRG DESIGN INC." (FROM SN 27822 AND N89.20'10"E -0-1--INITIAL POINT \ \ iv PLAT OF HAMPTON COURT) �- 45.01 \ \ PARCEL a PARCEL 2 \ 7'\ 15b. / / F0. - OENOTES FOUND • 1S \/ 5;c% C.R• 290 - W .� I.P. DENOTES IRON PIPE ( , f � I.R. - DENOTES IRON ROD I ;7 / �� SF - DENOTES SQUARE FEET 8 N I . Q�w ,.� -P.+N'1+4 . NO. - DF!,IOTES DC%CUYFNT NUMBER W \ .1,, W/YPC - DENOTES WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP t. -'tend i 2 PUE - DENOTES PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT "! r S la. ' C6 i 1 . 68 3 10.v C6 , . P. "4.74 L=28.04 O2 ! S9' ►4'31"ITV E0 ;777 v CO . .- I 'o sr L- -- <C`' 1 NARRATIVE: THE PURPOSE OF THIS PARTITION IS TO PARTITION LOT 27 OF THE PLAT OF HAMPTON COURT TOGETHER WITH THAT LAND DESCRIBED IN DOC. NO. 2001Q81136, WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS. 3 FOR THE BASIS OF BEARINGS AND BOUNDARY DETERMINATION SEE SURVEY NO. 28,720, WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEY RECORDS. I 4 REGISTERED \ REFERENCES: PROFESSIONAL PLAT OF HAMPTON COURT LAND SURVEYOR DOC. 99-091538 2.50, ,.„,,,2,..,_ DOC. 2001081136 "' -•.:4 SURVEY N0. 27,822 N89'201101 ?8,.63 R�.�iQ�S9, Y�. �� CURVE TABLE .'A 8 •Q,NC> PAUL W. PERRY CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA (FIORD BEARING ;) g Cl 79.71 230.00' 19'52'19" 79.31 S6 725'57.W 8 L \ 58587LS 1 SHEET 1 OF 2 2Q \s C2 96.17" 179.Q4' 3;74'44" 14.89: 573�42�1o'W $89'20'10"W 79.09' R°ZD .+1 4°20 a\`a�, EXPIRES 12-31-02 PLAT PREPARED BY: C3 47. .•" ,!.+►/ ••'4 1 4 .• ' 44'4 47"E ACCESS EASEMENT QO•\� r\Qi 41' G & L LAND SURVEYING, INC. IN 70.75' 230.00' 17.37'25" 70.47' 568'33'23"W 6a.\v''• ti°`' 8116 S.W. NIMBUS AVE. (2678 S.F.) Li\''' ti� . :.1 • 17..s;!' 1_. " .7.;7' : : 7"W FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL 1 ,; \ ,, El 28.0e 17 0.00' c '27'04" 28.01' S8- 510'58"W . 6''4 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97008 • _•' A• 4,0' = •.:'47" : : �•1' . ' •• \I.:1(.3.0 PHONE: 503.641.0308 Ca 20.30' 20.00' '37" 19.44' 561.35'01"E FAX 503.671.0877 '' DETAIL A SCALE: 1'=30' C9 .13' 4. •" 1 ' S74.2••'16"W JOB 2252 • PARTITION P NO. 2001 .OF TIGARD APP ROVALS: . AP IS DAY OF . 20 ©z.- RECORDED AS DOCUMENT N O. CITY OF TIGARD CITY ENGINEER . SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE: A PORTION BEING A REPLAT OF LOT 27, I. PAUL W. PERRY, STATE THAT I HAVE CORRECTLY SURVEYED AND MARKED WITH HAMPTON COURT BY Q P. -°" 5/8 INCH BY 30 INCH IRON RODS WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED "G & L LAND SURVEYING, INC. , OR OTHER MONUMEENTATION AS SHOWN, ALL PARCEL CORNERS AND LOCATED I N THE SOUTH WEST 1 /4 OF BOUNDARY UNE CHANGES IN DIRECTION THE LAND REPRESENTED ON THE PARTITION PLAT, LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTIOI+i 12, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE �^►*� p ***************************************••••••••••• 1 WEST, WKIAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, DESCRIBED SE C 1 I 0 N 12 T. 2 S., R. 1 W., W.M. AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INITIAL POINT BEING A 5/8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED CITY OF T WRG DESIGN, INC." AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 27 OF THE PLAT OF HAMPTON COURT; WASHINGTON COUNTY APPROVALS: THENCE NORTH 00*37'55" EAST, 25.01 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON MARKED "G It L LAND SURVEYING, INC."; THENCE NORTH 8970'10" EAST, 282.60 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC GAP MARKED "G & L LAND SURVEYING, INC." AT A POINT SURVEYED: SEPTEMBER 6, 2001 APPROVED THIS DAY OF 20 OF A NON-TANGENT 230.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC CW SAID CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19'52'19", DECLARATION: (THE LONG CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 67'25'57" WEST, 79.37 FEET), 79.77 FEET TO A WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYOR 5/8' IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED "WRG DESIGN, INC."; THENCE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, SOUTH 5779'47" WEST, 99.93 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED AN OREGON CORPORATION IS THE OWNER OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN THE "ALPHA ENO., INC." AT THE BEGINNING OF A 170.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE AND AS SHOWN ON THE ANNEXED PARTITION PLAT, THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE AND HAVE CAUSED THE SAME TO BE SURVEYED AND PARTITIONED INTO PARCELS BY OF 32'24'44", (THE LONG CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 73'42'09" WEST, 94.89 FEET), 96.17 FEET AS SHAWN ON THE PARTITION PLAT, AND DO HEREBY GRANT ALL EASEMENTS AS TO A 5/8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED "ALPHA, ENG, INC."; THENCE NOTED OR SHOWN ON THE PLAT. SOUTH $'"54'31" WEST, 4.74 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED "ALPHA ENG., INC." AT THE BEG*4NOIG OF A 30.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, **********± ***+•+•********************************* THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE AN OREGON CORPORATION OF 90'43'24", (THE LONG CHORD OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 44'43'47" WEST, 42.69 FEET), 47.50 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED "ALPHA, ENG., INC."; THENCE NORTH 0O17'55" EAST, 52.19 FEET TO THE INITIAL POINT. STATE OF OREGON SS CONTAINS 0.42 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. REGISTERED COUNTY OF WASHINGTON PROFESSIONAL (-7) �-- . I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PARTITION PLAT WAS LAND SURVEYOR BY: RECEIVED FOR RECORD ON THIS ************************************************************** DAY OF 20 . .. _ - W ./ ORE • ATo'CLOCK M., AND RECORDED IN THE _ Y 12, 1999 / ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: COUNTY CLERICGOiDS. PAUL W. PERRY 1%0 58587LS STATE OF OREGON EXPIRES 12-31-02 COUNTY OF WASHINGTON S.S. BY DEPUTY QTY CLERK THIS INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME ON 44- 25-7-41:7 BY CRAIG BROWN AS VICE PRESIDENT OF MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. **********************************•*************** ALL TAXES, FEES, ASSESSMENTS OR OTHER CHARGES • :', OFFICI SEAL 9 -.:•:'-'1#' CHRISTOPHER WATSON AS PROVIDED BY O.R.S. 92.095 HAVE BEEN PAID AS NOTARY P . C FOR THE STATE OREGON WI NOTfiRY PUELIC-OREGON( 20 OF 0 EGON '`.: ..�/ COMMISSION NO.333444 /j){ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 16,2004 DIRECTOR OF ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 4?". 4 49 MIA TON COMM OFKGON BY DEPUTY ************************************************** SHEET 2 OF 2 PLAT PREPARED BY: G & L LAND SURVEYING, INC. 8116 S.W. NIMBUS AVE. BEAVERTON, OREGON 97008 PHONE: 503.641.0308 FAX: 503.671.0877 JOB 2252 • G & L LAND SURVEYING, INC. Professional Land Surveyors TRANSMITTAL Date: January 3, 2002 tf-Altlerk.k(.°0-‘ , To: Phone: b3 A\A\ From: Paul Perry, PLS RECEIVED P A.° ING Re: Partition Plat for Matrix Development JAN 0 2002 Lot 27, Hampton Court Tigard, Oregon CITY OF TIGARD Job: 2252 Revised mylars enclosed for first sheet of plat, as well as previously made second sheet, together with City of Tigard comments. Copies mailed to Gilbert Arp, Washington County Surveyor's Office this date. Please call me if you have questions. Thanks,She— 8116 S.W. Nimbus Avenue • Beaverton, Oregon 97008 • (503) 641-0308 • Fax (503) 671-0877 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE RECEIVED RECEIVED PLANNING (60 DEC 26 2001 CITY OF TIGARD TO: DEPT: &ffntao/7.15 FROM: -�-� Q04 PHONE NUMBER: '6O3 " 6q r 0-75 CiA11 off tot- a , M RE: (Case numb r, site address, parcel number, etc.) 1.4 L to COMMENTS: jttcS NA-C m �a��-� its 1• -- " 14,6 \jack i:dsts/forms/LetterTransmittal.doc MfZooIocc& 3 /0A- P5 . , . ., . ) , FiArtadt, l ‘ 1-- illr - - • NOTES ND PLAT RESTRICTIONS: ,._.. a PARTITION PLAT NO. 2001 x 1.) 9 SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PER THE CITY.' < /Th. OF 'TIGARD SUBDIVISION CASE NO. 98-0013 AND CITY OF T1GARD"RLANN:-.0 > N) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CASE NO. 98-0011. `` fr"iis P1/447 2,11P%-■.2=)01 RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. u..i CN , . \ 2.) THERE WILL BE NO DIRECT kgr-op` VEHICLE ACCESS TO OR FROM S.W.•PRSS __J STREET FROIA Kel`-`21. pAesaus. ( i, Z.- . D A REPLAT OF LOT 27 3.) SUBJECT TO COVEL,NANT : CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS RECORDED AS DOCU ENT NO. 2000-023569, WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS. 9 co HAMPTON COURT ,,• • 0 4.) XXXXXX , ,. z PAg-Cel-S i i'.4: 2- Alt‘ _• . LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST 1 /4 OF I SECTION 12, T. 2 S. , R.R 1 W., W. M . x • CITY OF TIGARD (...) WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON ....._..., SCALE: 1" = 30' J SURVEYED: AUGUST 21, 2001 -J < ACCESS EASEMENT LEGEND: = 30' (SEE DETAIL B BELOW) N8920'10"E 282 60' _°. - 0 - DENOTES SET 5/8" X 30" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW .-- PLASTIC CAP MARKED "G & L LAND SURVEYING, INC." ' 63.02' •--- 219.58' 00' ' i I ACCESS EASEMENT .1.-5C3* () 00 i'k 75 . X - DENOTES SET 5/8" X 30" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW , CI1/4 9,,-:.--- 70 5 (SEE DETAIL A BELOW) \ lb 0 PLASTIC CAP MARKED "G & L LAND SURVEYING, INC." C•J 46 " INITIAL POINT - - - - - -•- - - - - - --;" ---- ;10. 111 217.29 ---.. \\ -• AC3' `Ilk - DENOTES FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC N892010"E r-- - S89-20.10"W _ _ . ...,-- \_,,,' „ _ CAP MARKED "WRG DESIGN, INC." N.,__ \ t..73,... , ,, .------ 45.01' --- ', ' STREET VACATION (DOC. NO. 99-91538, 8/4/99) , ‘ v N1' • , 5 P . • . = b as P . ".. • ii \ \ \ ro,,., / \ • - DENOTES FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC o IA c/' CAP MARKED "ALPHA ENG., INC." LaJ f%1 0 5 AC. ' o 9.2i AC. v (A I in 'N . t OS Sta- -'- -c N.,.v.- .i6 7 ., . FD. - DENOTES FOUND Y) q \.) c:, V 1 L L-)-F - ''' .'*'-'r . I c ., _Ako r ) / f; Y`- ,.‘ 10. ,4 _r_ ,..- ---- I.P. - DENOTES IRON PIPE 1 .. d N1 CP . 7__ __________-- \ z .0 9° 4,9 HAMPTON ..,,, COURT Nci ,,p. , S.F. - DENOTES SQUArRE FEET ( pc Z cpil.-*\- . 2C ■ in 7., V \ S.N. - DENOTES SURVEY NUMBER DOC. NO. - DENOTES DOCUMENT NUMBER PLAT BOOK 129, r) PAGE 26 )."-:. . / I r 8 -- •0. C,' V 2 '6 o z ■ ----- W/WC - DENOTES WI TH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP " .------ . •Lp 0.1\ ._-..-- c5 (. 0. PUE - DENOTES PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT 0- `-9 ---- - .‘"3. r. ON' \ l as k 066' l`''' kP .t 4.74' L=28.04. $ Ci2. 0 "00' S8954'31„W L 96.17i \ . - I 12. , z.--- ..- .-'A.57:5),s, 37 2` \ v,tiT. ‘ 14'i r;) ._-------- - -,. - ------- - c ' 1 NARRATIVE: , 45(KIS7 FLAN16, ' C°1:F4>., _.•/ THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO PARTITION LOT 27 OF THE PLAT OF ...r...1 2- poti,rrs Cc...p..43,44 b) ,,,- HAMPTON COURT TOGETHER WITH THAT LAND DESCRIBED IN RIGHT OF WAY _____. _ . .. •- " ' VACATION DOCUMENT 99-091538, AS WELL AS THAT LAND DESCRIBED IN ._... \., 3 ,., • --A7r2F455 a ,... „......, 51,, witiz 60.00 N DOCUMENT 2001081136, WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS. ;, (. ; '1 ' ..,,.. FOR THE BASIS OF BEARINGS AND BOUNDARY DE TERMINATION SEE PLAT OF HAMPTON COURT, PLAT BOOK 129, PAGE 26, WASHINGTON COUNTY PLAT _ . , - - .„ , • RECORDS. I 4 %, ...- ' , ---w., ; ta FA. ZI) • sr ..(;,....---- - '. '., ' ‘,..A'-74, Se,i'vrLit:114141fG,1"4::0•Elr-A,.„1::-1-"-!'t4rilli11...)"7") I * REGISTERED '.\ REFERENCES. • e■'S .N(T PROFESSIONAL I '*. cf OficA5100 ) `• OK 44-c=44. .. 4 PLAT OF HAMPTON COURT •, . a. LAND SURVEYOR "-- I 2.50' / ! " N 00'39'50" W - DOC. 99-091538 DOC. 2001081136 -2 - - - ----- ------ ---- i ' 4 0 r . 5,92' N 8920'10" E w ..,2 -8 N870710 --- fb4--- •60" -!- " •--22.34'-. OREGON SURVEY NO. 27,822 CURVE TABLE 0'-• ' 11■••■• [4 JANLIAFiT 12. 199 #41 "h iii '00 NCI> -1,' Cg CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD BEARING n - \ 1001 2.3.`*' o' \._ 0 PAUL W. PERRY 58587 liX-1\ SHEET 1 OF 2 Cl 79.77' 230.00' 1952'19" 79.37' S67'25'57"W 0 - - _ __ -RL_N.5. 0 S8920.10W 78.70' .c.25----.45,, \tP VV.'■.6. - C2 96.17' 170.00' 32'24'44 . 94.89' S73'42.10W Z •0\ 0 1.0 O. \N-3. ACCESS EASEMENT EXPIRES 12-31-02 ...5 C3 47.50' 30.00' 90'42'51" 42.69' 544'4347E \ (62 S.F.) (,441 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE PLAT PREPARED BY: ACCESS EASEMENT 1- 4, G & L LAND SURVEYING, INC. C4 70.75' 230.00' 17'37'25 70.47' 56833'23W , I/\N-1 .0.' FOR THE BENEFIT OF ADJACENT AND EXACT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL (2046 S.F.) rl. Tr 0 , C5 68.13' 170.00' 22'57'38 67.67' S6858'37W FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL 1 v`\t5' PROPERTY OWNER TO THE NORTH PARTITION PLAT. 8116 S.W. NIMBUS AVE. 0; 0 - co ,t‘ - C6 28.04' 170.00' 09'27'04 28.01' 58510'58W BEAVERTON, OREGON 97008 -.),/ ., . . C7 40.69t 40.00' 58'09'37" 36.68' S61-35.01E *- ' L --', VY-1/4';' PHONE: 503.641.0308 C8 25.38' 25.00' 58'09'37" 24.30' 561'35'01E <N`...: -, FAX 503.671.0877 DETAIL A SCALE: l'=30' DETAIL B SCALE: 1•=30' ), , C9 23.13' 230.00 5'45'40" 23.12' _ S74'29'16"W , JOB 2252 . N't<1% /----------- f-- )(-.1t•S6 * ( l 1 i tr (ot _____ i. PARTITION PLAT NO. 2001 -- RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. WASHINGTON COUNTY APPROVALS. . SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE: A REPLAT OF LOT 27, APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 20 I, PAUL W. PERRY, STATE THAT I HAVE CORRECTLY SURVEYED AND MARKED WITH HAMPTON COURT 5/8 INCH BY 30 INCH IRON RODS WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED "G & L LAND LOCATED I N THE .SOUTHWEST 1 4 0 F SURVEYING, INC . OR OTHER MONUMENTAfION AS SHOWN, ALL PARCEL CORNERS ANO / BOUNDARY LINE CHANGES IN DIRECTION THE LAND REPRESENTED ON THE PARTITION PLAT, WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYOR BEING LOT 27, HAMPTON COURT, WASHINGTON COUNTY PLAT RECORDS. TOGETHER WITH SECTION 12 T. 2 S• R• 1 W., W.M• A PORTION OF THAT RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 99091538, t WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS, AS LOCATED IN TH SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF CITY 0 F TI G A R D SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAM TTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF TIGARD, BY WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, MORE PARTICULARLY DES BED AS FOLLOWS: TH INITIAL POINT BEING A 5 8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON BEGINNING AT E / *******,**.**********•**,****•*•**•**'****•*w•****** "WRG DESIGN, INC." AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 27 OF THE PLAT OF HAMPTON COURT; THENCE NORTH :00'37'5.5" EAST, 25.01 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP SURVEYED: AUGUST 21, 2001 MARKED 'G & L LAND SURVEYING, INC."; THENCE NORTH 89'20'10" EAST, 282.60 FEET TO A DECLARATION: 5/8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED "G & L LAND SURVEYING, INC.~ AT THE STATE OF OREGON BEGINNING OF A 230.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, SS ARC OF SAID CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19'52119", COUNTY OF WASHINGTON (THE LONG CHORD QF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 67'25'57" WEST, 79.37 FEET), 79.77 FEET TO A AN OREGON CORPORATION IS THE OWNER OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN THE 5/8" IRON ROD WMTH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED "WRG DESIGN, INC."; THENCE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE AND AS SHOWN ON THE ANNEXED PARTITION PLAT, , I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PARTITION PLAT WAS SOUTH 57'29'47" WEST, 99.93 FEET TO A 5/8 IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED AND HAVE CAUSED THE SAME TO BE SURVEYED AND PARTITIONED INTO PARCELS a RECEIVED FOR RECORD ON THIS "ALPHA ENG., INC. AT THE BEGINNING OF A 170.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; AS SHOWN ON THE PARTITION PLAT, AND DO HEREBY GRANT ALL EASEMENTS AS THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE NOTED OR SHOWN ON THE PLAT. DAY OF. 20 OF 3274'44" (THE LONG CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 73'42'10" WEST, 94.89 FEET), 96.17 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED "ALPHA. ENGL, INC."; THENCE MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, AT O'CLOCK M., AND RECORDED IN THE SOUTH 89'54'31" WEST, 4.74 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED AN OREGON CORPORATION COUNTY CLERK RECORDS. "ALPHA ENG., INC." AT THE BEGINNING OF A 30.00 F001 RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90'42'51", (THE LONG CHORD OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 44'43'47" 42.69 FEET), 47.50 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON. ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED "ALPHA, ENG. INC."; THENCE BY DEPUTY COUNTY CLERK NORTH 00'37'55" EAST, 52.19 FEET TO THE INITIAL POINT. N.N.d5rr CONTAINS 0.42 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. REGISTERED BY: . PROFESSIONAL *************,**** **, **************************** LAND SURVEYOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: ALL TAXES. FEES. ASSESSMENTS OR OTHER CHARGES AS PROVIDED BY O.R.S. 92.095 HAVE BEEN PAID AS OREGON 12, STATE OF OREGON S.S. PAUL W. PERRY COUNTY OF WASHINGTON OF 20 DIRECTOR OF ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION 58587 THIS CERTIFIES THAT ON THIS DAY OF 2001 BEFORE ME WASHINGTON .COUNTY, OREGON EXPIRES 12-31-02 PERSONALLY APPEARED CRAIG BROWN AND WHO BEING FIRST DULY SWORN DID SAY I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE THAT HE IS THE VICE PRESIDENT OF MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, AN OWNER AND EXACT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN THE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE AND HAS EXECUTED THE PARTITION PLAT. FOREGOING INSTRUMENT AND DOES HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE BY OF HIS OWN FREE ACT AND DEED. DEPUTY *•************************************************ NOTARY PUBUC FOR THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SS COUNTY OF WASHINGTON I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS TRACING IS A COPY CERTIFIED TO ME, BY THE SURVEYOR OF THIS PARTITION PLAT, TO BE A TRUE AND EXACT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL, AND THAT IT WAS RECORDED ON THE DAY OF , 20 , AT O'CLOCK M., AND RECORDED IN THE COUNTY CLERK RECORDS. BY DEPUTY COUNTY CLERK SHEET 2 OF 2 PLAT PREPARED BY: G & L LAND SURVEYING, INC. 8116 S.W. NIMBUS AVE. BEAVERTON, OREGON 97008 PHONE: 503.641,0308 . FAX: 503.671.0877 k_ JOB 2252 4, FAX TRANSMITTAL Date November 14, 2001 Number of pages including cover sheet 1 To: Gilbert Arp From: Brian Rager Co: WACO Surveyor's Office Co: City of Tigard Fax #: (503) 846-2909 Fax#: 503-624-0752 Ph #: 639-4171, Ext. 318 SUBJECT: MLP 2001-00009, Hampton Court Partition MESSAGE: We have completed our review of this plat, and the public improvements have been constructed. Please put this one in line for your review. The surveyor is G&L. Thanks. • I:ENG\FAX.DOT We have completed our review of this plat, and the public improvements have been constructed. Please put this one in line for your review. The surveyor is G&L. Thanks. l�ENGFFAX.DOT TOa STE.ON 03 N019NIHS'Wl F 9NI633NIEN3 8E.:TO T00E/bT/TT 0000 >10 TO XI 03 NOlONIHSJP1 „0E;00 bT/TT 11f S3 1 S39ad 3301 GI N0 I lb1S 1NkilS I Q 3N I 1-d`S 31t+Q 9NId33NICJN3=QI 6?:TO T00E/VT/TT NO I LUWa I dNO 39 SS N • • LAND PARTITION ���" 14 TYPE II APPLICATION �,L�LII! CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION e ROSS ST-- PRE-APP.HELD WITH: 4/3/0 i Property Address/Location(s): 841 5 W DATE OF PRE APP.: if/ f 43R_ Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): FOR,STAFF USE ON"LY-:::. 2 5 / 12- C3 / f7bOJ '..,::,',1,'::. nR } .' `t , / Case No(s):-/4 Lle -88 6-Q 67•Site Size: / e, 133 S �, /44f2 �L ,1,,•. . • `Othee;.Ga*No:'(s)`.. Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: 1 A-T16 X t tiELnP tieVr !oRP ::Receipt,op;: ,2d.cc,/`.--aa'. • _' ' -}I� 2 go °Application`Accepte i'B Address: /2?E;5 Su) (7Q five /Gn Phone: O—eo . /: ,H.-. �� X161 972_23 Date' `� City: ?o(LTC-�IN 0 c)/2_ Zip: , Applicant`: /L I / 4 / �� `� �-t v /l e____4- Date Determined;Complete 1` Address: g A-r►tC- /a3 Phone: :Rev 1/11/200.1 :'' .il curptn\mesters\reVised\iandpartdoc>" CU City: Zip: *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written (Note: applications will nsit be accepted authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written without the required submittal elements) authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. 10" Application Form QrOwner's Signature/Written Authorization PROPOSAL SUMMARY Er Title Transfer Instrument or Deed The owners of record of the subject property request permission to ©Copy of Pre-Application Conf. Notes allow a Land Partition to: ❑ Site/Plot Plan L not r\_1.1avic0 (#of copies based on pre-app check list) divide /8/ 233 S, !�, into _ �- _ 0S'te/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/:"x 11") (total area) (#of parcels) • containing (OS 77 and 1/ (51(o Applicant's Statement (sq. ft. or acres) (sq. ft. or acres) (#of copies based on pre-app check list) �, ^n— CKUSA Sewer Use Information Card 9j'f e,GACtl R L E eJ r for LiN E- ► I�c�(sT�r+"-'► (Di buted/completed at application submittal) (provide any additional information here) A Service Provider Letter l9 Nr0 PO4{ZT ri©ri` 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped #10 Envelopes & Copy of 500' Property caner List Generated by the City_ Filing Fee (City) 780.00 i (Urban) $2,480.00 1 • S List any VARIANCE OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: Lor Liav E �-��Tu sT- t T r o trL T E ,to27-h/x-12- c4Y Co Ill s e7 t?iaop 7 APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this 34 day of 20� INt.R t)e p Ecop.me-A.,T aten. Owne'- • u� Owner's Signature V 4E..bT Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 71":„..0 73 /17,.. Q .„6-e✓e,4 +e411 Receipt #: 27200100000000002255 ..„..40111111k0 TIDEMARK Date: 06/01/2001 COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due MLP2001-00009 [LANDUS]MLP Application Fee 100-0000-438000 $780.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Check MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORP 0 24338 $780.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $780.00 • CITY OF TIGARD July 9, 2001 OREGON Tri-Angle LLC Attn: Steve Roper 11290 SW Blakeney St. Beaverton, OR 97008 RE: Hampton Court MLP 2001-00009 Completeness Letter Dear Mr. Roper, The City of Tigard received your application for a Minor Land Partition on May 30, 2001 and the additional items requested on July 9, 2001. The property is described as map 2S112CB, tax lot 17800, and is located within a medium density residential zoning district. Your application has been deemed complete and is scheduled for review. A decision on this application should be issued in 5-6 weeks. As we have discussed in the past, the lot line adjustment will need to be completed prior to the final plat being signed and recorded. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, contact me at (503) 639-4171, x388. Sincerely, Brad Kilby Associate Planner cc: Land use case file No. MLP 2001-00009 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN CH LIST Projei IlA G�.R-c L-C Z.1 FOR Date: • c.e zA l o t LAND USE APPLICATION SUBMITTALS E C MPLETE ❑ INCOMPLETE • • GRADING [r' Existing and proposed contours shown. [� Are adjacent parcels impacted by proposed grading? ❑ Yes -8-No 11j - Adjacent parcel grades shown. • STR7ET ISSUES Right-of-way clearly shown? E]/▪ - Centerline of street clearly shown? [r Name of street(s) shown? EK Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown? Profiles of proposed streets ..0---AP-Future Streets Plan provided? (subdivisions and some partitions) • ❑ profiles ❑ topo shown on adjacent property? P, Traffic study required/submitted? Do proposed street grades comply with City standards? 12 Widths of proposed public streets shown? 0V Widths of streets appropriate? jars\°, Are private streets proposed?tv3 ❑ under 6 lot minimum? ❑ width appropriate? • ❑Other: SANITARY SEWER ISSUES I2/ Existing/proposed lines shown? ❑' Stubs to adjacent parcels required? , WATER ISSUES r. Existing/proposed lines w/sizes noted? Existing/proposed fire hydrants? • [t]/ Proposed meter location and size shown? [� Proposed fire protection system shown? STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES [Er Existing/proposed lines? P` Preliminary sizing calculation of water quality and/or detention provided? ji.A4 Water quality and/or detention facility shown on plan? ❑ does area provided match calculations for size requirement? P Stubs to adjacent properties required? 11-‘,3\17+ Water quality and/or detention shown outside of any wetland buffer? i:tengibrianrVnasters\public facility plan checklist.doc REVISED: 03/13/01 June 14, 2001 //i44110 0,,� y\Roper Tri Angle LLC CITY OF TIGARD 11290 SW Blakeney St. OREGON Beaverton, OR 97008 (503) 469-1213 Dear Mr. Roper: The City of Tigard is in receipt of the Land Partition application (MLP2001-00009) for the property at 8421 SW Ross Street. Concurrently with this application, a Lot Line Adjustment is requested. After a preliminary review, Staff found that there is missing or incomplete information. Please submit the following information for review: 1) Please fill out a Lot Line Adjustment application, and include the information listed on the application. (A Lot Line Adjustment application is included with this letter.) Please include the information about your property as well as the property to the north. A signature from the owner of the property to the north is required. You do not need to submit the deed information, or the reduced site/plot plan, nor any additional applicant statements, as that information is included in the packets submitted for the Minor Lot Partition. Only 3 copies of the full sized map and plans will be necessary, instead of the six listed. Please indicate on the maps the acreage of both properties before and after the lot line adjustment. Because this adjustment is concurrent with the Minor Lot Partition, it is only necessary to pay 20% of the filing fee. The filing fee is normally $100, so a fee of$20 is due before this application can be deemed complete. 2) From the pre-application notes, a Tree Preservation/Mitigation plan from a certified arborist is required for this property. Please submit a Tree Preservation/Mitigation plan in accordance with chapter 18.790 of the Community Development Code. 3) Please address in a short narrative whether there are existing structures on the property, and if they will be kept or demolished. If there is a structure, and it is to be kept, then please submit three copies of a new map showing the structure, and indicate on the map the setback distances around the structure. When your application is deemed complete, an additional 9 copies of the Partition booklet will be required. They should include the above requested information. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns at (503) 639-4171 ext. 315. Sincerely, FW(1-g1/43c.inc.k.rAC Jodi Buchanan Current Planning City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 FRoPosAV/V/4 RR44(ri V E 1 HAMPTON COURT LOT 27 PARTITION . City of Tigard, Oregon I 1 Agent: Tri-Angle LLC Contact: Steve Roper ' 11290 SW Blakeney St. Beaverton, OR 97008 (503) 469-1213 ' Applicant: Matrix Development Corporation ' Contact: Jacki Herb 12755 SW 69th Avenue, #100 Portland, OR 97223 (503) 620-8080 I W 1 i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 1 I. Project Description 1 II. Development Overview III. Lot Line Adjustment Approval Criteria IV. Partition Approval Criteria 1 , V. Preliminary Plans 1 VI. Property Title Information 1 VII. Pre-application Conference Notes VIII. Supporting pP 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • Proposed 2-Lot Residential Minor Land Partition & Lot Line Adjustment P Adjustment PROJECT DESCRIPTION ' Applicant: Matrix Development Corporation Contact: Jackie Herb l Phone: (503) 620-8080 _ci a4 3 Agent: Tri-Angle LLC Contact: Steve Roper 4-- Co- -.on� k r ' h�° ' Phone: (503) 469-1213 Property Address: 8421 SW Ross St. ' Legal: Map 1S112CB, Tax Lot 17800 Comprehensive Plan: Light Density Residential ' Zoning: R-7 Citizen Involvement Team: South ' Request: Lot Line Adjustment and Minor Land Partition of Lot 27 in the Hampton Court Subdivision. II DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW ' The applicant is proposing to develop the site into 2 single-family residential lots, all in excess of 6,500 square feet in area. The lots will range in size from 6,577 square feet to 11,656 square feet, with the average lot size of Hampton ' Court Subdivision equal to 5,118 square feet. The development would utilize the existing access directly from SW Ross Street. Internal circulation would consist of a reciprocal access easement that would access onto SW Ross Street for the proposed two (2) lots. The northern portion of the development has an existing 45-foot utility easement that will incorporate a shared access easement and a paved driveway. The ' remainder of the area outside the building envelope and the driveway will be landscaped. The applicant plans on retaining all the existing street trees on the site. There are no significant trees over 6" dbh located on the site. HAMPTON COURT LOT 27 PARTITION 1 TRI-ANGLE LLC ' • • t III Section 18.410.40 of the Development Code lists the approval criteria for P pP ' lot line adjustments as follows: 1. An additional parcel is not created by the lot line adjustment, and the existing parcel reduced in size by the adjustments is not ' reduced below the minimum lot size established by the zoning district; I Response: The lot line adjustment will increase the size of tax lot 17,800 from 12,112 square feet to 18,233 square feet. 2. By reducing the lot size, the lot or structures(s) on the lot will not be in violation of the site development or zoning district regulations for tthat district; Response: ' There are no existing structures on the site, and the required setbacks are shown on plan sheet 3 and how the R-7 setback criteria have been met. Additionally, the building permit site plan ' submittal will show how the building envelope has met the underlying zone setbacks. ' 3. The resulting parcels are in conformity with the dimensional standards of the zoning district, including: ' a. The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district; ' Response: The zoning district requires that the lot width be 50 feet. The proposed development has a minimum lot width is 63 feet. The proposed development exceeds the criteria for the underlying zone. b. The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the ' accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation; ' Response: The zoning district requires that the lot average be 5,000 square feet. The proposed development will ' bring up the lot average of the Hampton Court Subdivision to 5,118 square feet from its existing ' HAMPTON COURT LOT 27 PARTITION 2 TRI-ANGLE LLC ' • average of 5,081 square feet. c. Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a ' legally recorded minimum 15-foot wide access easement; and ' Response: The proposed development has a 15-foot wide reciprocal access easement across lot 28 for access ' and utilities per Section 18.705 and a minimum of 10 feet paved width. ' d. Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. ' Response: The proposed development meets the setback requirement for the underlying R-7 zone. Lot 27 will ' have a 10' street side yard setback on the Hall Blvd. side of the unit. The units will both assume the Ross ' St. frontage as the front 15' setback. The lots at the shared lot line will have a 5' setback, and have a minimum of 15' in the rear. See plan sheet 3. ' 4. With regard to flag lots: a. When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer ' may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. • Response: ' No lots on the proposed development are considered flag lots. b. A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in ' accordance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas ' for proposed development. HAMPTON COURT LOT 27 PARTITION 3 TRI-ANGLE LLC ' • • Response: ' The street trees have been planted per the requirements of section 18.745.040 with the developme C Subdivisio ' additional nt property of added Hampton to ourt the north, n.2 .additionaWith the l trees of the same species will be planted along SW Ross with the proposed development. 5. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where ' the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities. ' Response: The deputy fire marshal has no problem with the accessway since the proposed developments building envelopes are within 500 feet of a fire hydrant. 6. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one ' lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. Response: The proposed development will record at a minimum of 15' wide ' reciprocal access easement with the partition plat. 7. Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress, and Circulation. I . Response: The access easement for the proposed development will have a minimum of 15 foot easement and a minimum of 10 feet of ' pavement. IV Section 18420.50 Land Partitions ' A request to partition land shall meet all of the following criteria: ' 1. The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; ' Response: The subject site is zoned‘R-7 Single Family Residential (5,000 HAMPTON COURT LOT 27 PARTITION 4 TRI-ANGLE LLC • • square foot lot size minimum). All lots meet the area and dimensional requirements of the R-7 zone. The applicant is proposing a 15-foot reciprocal access easement to serve lot 27. ' 2. There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal; ' Response: Final order No: 99-01 PC approved the Hampton Court Subdivision (formerly Elderberry Square) for 27 lots and 28 units with lot 27 being ' a duplex lot. The proposed partition development will create 28 single-family lots with 28 units. Therefore, the proposed development will not create any additional demand on the existing public facilities ' then that which was already approved in the aforementioned final order. Also, see attached USA service provider letter. ' 3. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards; and ' Response: The public improvements required by the proposed development are the water service tap and the sanitary sewer service lateral. There is ' also street improvements to SW Ross that will involve street widening, curb and sidewalk extension, and a driveway drop to serve Tax Lot 900's existing driveway. The City of Tigard Water Department will perform the water service tap. The street improvements and sanitary sewer service lateral be done per USA and City of Tigard public improvement standards. All on-site Iplumbing will be done per the Plumbing Code and City of Tigard Building Department Standards. The applicant requests that the Hall ' Street improvements be bonded at this time and be constructed with the improvements of TL 900. ' 4. All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below: a. The minimum width of the building envelope area shall ' meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. ' Response: The zoning district requires that the lot width be 50 feet. The proposed development has a minimum lot width is 63 feet. The proposed development exceeds the criteria for the underlying zone. HAMPTON COURT LOT 27 PARTITION 5 TRI-ANGLE LLC 1 ■ i I • • I . II b. The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway _ may not be included in the lot area calculation. Response: zoning district requires that the lot average be IThe 5,000 square feet. The proposed development will bring up the lot average of the Hampton Court ' Subdivision to 5,118 square feet from its existing average of 5,081 square feet. . c. Each slot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15-foot wide access easement. IResponse: . • The proposed development has a 15-foot wide • I reciprocal access easement across lot 28 for access and utilities per Section 18.705 and a minimum of 10 • I feet paved width. Id. Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. I i Response: The proposed development meets the setback ' requirement for the underlying R-7 zone. Lot 27 will have a 10' street side yard setback on the Hall Blvd. side of the unit. Both units will assume the Ross St. Ifrontage as the front 15' setback. The lots at the shared lot line will have a 5'setback, and have a Iminimum of 15' in the rear. See plan sheet 3. e. When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may I determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall j generally be located so as to maximize separation from Iexisting structures. Response: I No lots on the proposed development are considered flag lots. 1 HAMPTON COURT LOT 27 PARTITION 6 TRI-ANGLE LLC • • 1. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of rY g P deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and ' Response: The access easement will be recorded with the partition plat. ' 2. Copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. Response: Copies of the easements will be recorded and place on file with the City at the time of recording. ' D. Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. ' Response: The shared access will be owned and maintained by the owners of lot 27 and lot 28. ' E. Curb cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N. Response: The existing curb cut installed with the Hampton Court Subdivision improvements is in accordance with Section 18.810.O3ON. ' H. Minimum access requirements for residential use. 1. Vehicular access and egress for single-family, duplex or attached ' single-family dwelling units on individual lots and multi-family residential uses shall not be less than as provided in Table 18.705.1 and Table 18.705.2; ' Response: The reciprocal access is 15 foot width with 10 feet of pavement. HAMPTON COURT LOT 27 PARTITION 10 TRI-ANGLE LLC I i • O TABLE 18.705.1 VEHICULAR ACCESS/EGRESS REQUIREMENTS: RESIDENTIAL USE (6 OR FEWER UNITS) I Number Dwelling Minimum Number Minimum Access Minimum Unit/Lots of Driveways Width Pavement Width Required I1or2 1 15' 10' 1 3 PROPOSED VEHICULAR ACCESS/EGRESS: 1 2 RESIDENTIAL UNITS I Number Dwelling Driveway Access Width Pavement Width Unit/Lots I2 1 15' 10' I 5. Section 18.715.020 Density Calculation IZone: R-7 . 191,285 sq.ft. of gross site area 47.979 sa.ft. of public right-of-way Net: 143,306 sq.ft. I / 5.000 sa.ft (minimum lot area) 28.66 Units I6. Section 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards Response: I The proposed development consisting of 2 single-family residential dwelling will not be violation of the code section. 1 I7. Section 18.745.40 Landscaping & Screening Standards I. All development projects fronting on a public street, private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees ' HAMPTON COURT LOT 27 PARTITION 11 TRI-ANGLE LLC 1 • • ' Response: The clear vision area for the arterial Hall Boulevard and SW Ross is 35 feet and 30 ' feet for the shared access onto SW Ross. Therefore, the conditions of this section have been met. 12. Section 18.810.060 Lots A. Size and shape. Lot size, width, shape and orientation shall be appropriate for ' the location of the development and for the type of use contemplated, and: 1. No lot shall contain part of an existing or proposed public right-of-way within its dimensions; Response: No lot in the proposed development shall contain existing or proposed right-of- way. Therefore, the condition has been met. 2. The depth of all lots shall not exceed 2-1/2 times the average width, ' unless the parcel is less than 1-1/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district; • Response: The depth of the proposed development in the most extreme case is 1-2/3 times the average width. Therefore, the condition has been satisfied by the proposed development. ' B. Lot frontage. Each lot shall abut upon a public or private street, other than an alley, for a width of at least 25 feet unless the lot is created through a minor land partition, in which case Subsection 18.162.050 (C) applies, or unless the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, in which case the lot frontage shall be • at least 15 feet. ' Response: Lot 27 created by this proposed land partition will have a minimum of 15 foot ' wide access easement across lot 28 to SW Ross Street. Therefore, the condition has been met by the proposed development. HAMPTON COURT LOT 27 PARTITION 14 TRI-ANGLE LLC I 25O1 02: 25p Steveftper (5046-2088 p. 2 111 4:( tFile Number I i 66/ce 1 414 44 ' .. tindigtetSiwearkge Agency of vilashingtlin Cow* Sensitive Area PreScreeniiiig Site Aisessment Jurisdiction _ Jr' CF T I Re_1:), Date ii.41/1 ,(IrtS)i I Map&Tax Lot 2.*I/Z a 8 /7 6300 Owner Site Address gq-2-1 5 ul_./40S ST:. ' ti4! v.. r) .4,,.. .zlatitczNi (---- COAP-, Contact .S1-67t/e.7-- Proposed Activity . Address 11.1:00 .ti,, 1 -P1119-TIrf OW Phone te-614--7002$3 e0K_ .1e; 3 c:1 (6!),n. 4 471: ,-12./ 3 IY N NA Y N NA 0 X ri mUSAap 0CorrT4.1t7 tAiMap Int 0 x ri stonum.tor Infraftructure maps II—I QS* AtU 2, fl [---)kz Locally adopted studies or maps ri pi N Outer Specify Specify I • Based on a review of the above information and the requirements of USA Design and Construction Standards Resolution and Order 00-7: I El Sensitive areasi poteartially,exist ilin,tite or within 200' Of theeite. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE PERTIFJOAll ,014 PRIOR-TO ospwANOE OP A:SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER OR STORMiNATEN p-ohINEttioi4 PERMIT if Sep/Skive Areas I exist on the site or within goo feet On adjaCerit properties,a Natural iteSoUrces Atsessment Report may also be required. Sensitive areas do i -not-appear to iris.t Iln.site or within 200'-0fth , esite, Thla•pre, I screening site assessment 000-tkvt"4iiiiifi*toAis-need-tn evaluate and protect water quality 0041**enie6 if"th,er,ar*e040:1Ein:40#1■discovered On your - property_ 140 ViiRiAill SITE ASSESSMENT OR Stkii10E'liRdIffbER LETTER IS REGNIRED,THIS FORM Vilik.L.SERVE AS AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE A Isititiv*AtrellVoiiilECTION PERMIT; D The proposed aottvtiy:does not(met.tho dafk#tion of development. NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR StRVICE PROVIDER LEttik IS REQUIRED. IComments: I 4, _.■ ' wor , . . Reviewed By: ,-- 414 4/I PL. Data: IIF • I RW.... ed;Applicant ter niliale--57M-12.i.—BIM- 4-40 • I I I • . . .,,.,,,,,,,,,„ .',-,,,,'!?c.:-,.1,kP' ,,,`7:L'Vn-`,T.,,,::.,. =q.:Its?,‘Mr;.'AlgWFt3'rfffrr•'"P',ic.,,,Wrir4X:41A.,W, r-F-f•d,1:r„, rtA,..,1,1•,,,tst,,.. . .. O1 0 2: 25p Steve Roper '. p'. - • F. , .. , ..,4a4 23:33 FROM:WASHCO LAND L&U 5V .7_,U..5-t140-d7Uti Iti:k aw...) c7o =Fob rHsam.cia- wc _. • - -- , -'.. .•-- ----- ----- . PREAPPLIcATION DATE: .44'1,41. - : -•• - didalgiVir WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPANY 7-12,1„. IN.N., - .4_,G: ,..:_. ,., Dept. of Land Use&Tr-41#. CoNtAbT: — Land Development Services ADDRESS: LL? si'd -at,*_,Et-iv-46'1K S'n .'? 155 N. First AVE), Suite 350-13 1,. ,- .- t)-lil.:rviNI -,- Hillsbore, OR 97124 PHoNE: OWL Ph.001)846-061 FOX(503)846-2906 cigh*Afigi: 111 wtAfixi.00-wikOiingtottorMs NAM,c.• i4 fir el D. t 1,:. 0)-62,..ppi1,elf.J.-r- cole4n. REQUEST FOR STATEMENT , ADDRESS: 1lt7 S Lt.) 65-7tivii170,:o- Atioei OP DESIGN CONSIDEF14-TIONO FOR PoiCtc/.1, 10. I SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT(USA) \ ' 666.64•■ f • PHONE: 1:603,.,/,e767— ,_ _ .„ .c..)-zic-efe-re_a) Property Dose.:Tait Map(s) Lott:Numbrir(4); ., . - ---• —' 2-6'.1/2-6:p /7 .661, USA / • OTHER. Site&lie: /E:$1 248 442- . Site Address: 8 1-2i c:0 RoS s SI-. NeardiOrces Street(or directi ons*alle) • . ibly-Lt PROPOSED PROJECT NAME: L127- 27 . iiii.91‘,4 p rat') cr. ...,iusr)ivi.s,e3N.) I PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ACTION:foeird.oaidgpir acvlaw.sueennaoe.Ulric*riirrers9«.spsam...0.4, Al/A:1 ag_ "P tok t...1-.Cri 0 f■) EXISTING7USE: Liglia.,:,. ..;:::E -- , :2--;7 i .-},rir.f:C,t..,_ PR6Pos2D-USE: .<- ) N e*, L- " . F t c h,..i x:I.L y R S r 0.,;t.:4-1,, ., f;r4. c; 1. ..C.,,.1.— IF RESIDENTIAL: IF INDUSTRIALICOMMER0IAL: If INSTITUTIONAL! ticx•f**01146 peas: - -2- TYPE OF USE :14"06.-Fr li li GINGLL " A'P. ' 4144AN, NO.OF 86.Fi..40000 FLOOR AREA) i 8T,y. me,rsiEmPoYEESVMEBEIFS: ATTAO4Y4 FOLLOWING INOWANtiON TOTt0-1441*+kit . _ .- 1. 11*.1450/%1011*NlapiNi0111.0111.scale-1'=?a0'.ccititi*t.P.I100.01:*00Ser than-5 f.„OM) 2. OralkIPP:0514.*Y9Ut(litreett,i45.•paiiost titott ;6-11)16Mg eiiunttion:ptithitiewS.-coilakg,wetland,landscape areas), 31, ,V)CktjV•agip:(aklrifritdlit ft-00'r-t4 trifle) PLEASE ki-tiAkaetortkm0*Wri*Ottql71,-X APPLI00,11%,140T WASHINGTON COUNTY - -' • . • , '--- . •TO BE COMPLETED BY GOVERNING JURISDICTION DEVELOPMENT ACTION SUBMITTAL MUST CONSIDER THE FigILLOW/Itlii: • , I v1-14#•e-f-t*,110Y-,W1.00f- rati 0 Y 0 144 Water Quantity Facility requited ii,4 0 N • .s teiteiritti100•Siirtoldiie0.6a (J Y Intl - • 25,ft undisturbed coeridiseriOquIred Y Es N DNA rd/or Florid pieta eiders 0 V WO - ikfijortivast;t9.___,elsisitified:as a Flizadinqr • 11U11:■/' 1:3 N hydraulic and hydrological antiliSis requiNtd ini'y ci N COhAMENTS/EXPLA.NATION: AIL I, , 1 . ellklinaliartairarel7MIIM'4',_.' . . . ..,.... . _ _ __ ____ ..... ...... .v. • - :1111111W1111111111111111111111111r4111111G1L- ar,,...0. .. ........ .-V . loop low.IF,Naidiiiii4,.1 .,,,, 1, I, pqn..... im.isitairigniairp-.• . Arum: ita ‘ GATE: 711111VB I. _ POSTON: frr-4-Z SorAte Pro-USA 61161E19 . . F I • . .._ . . . . . fgLIM (NARy PiANS 11= 111111 —. . — 1 \ #I ,we xaat� II E APPLICATION INFORMATION PROJECT B \s„,MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORP. ADDRESS: 8421 SW ROSS ST. SITE 12755 SW 69th AVE, f 100 TAX MAP: 2S112CB 1' PORTUWD. OR 97223 COMP. PLAN MAP DES10NATION: LDR I CONTACT: JA010E HERB ZONE MAP D IATION: R-7 SW SATfl. g11ZEN INVOLVMENT TEAM AREA: SOUTH AEI R. - N 0. BOX Et 8 NET S.F. 1 I g II WILSONVILLE. OR 97070 ALLOWABLE LOTS 28.66 I I CONTACT: STEVE ROPER LOT AVERAGE: 5,118.07 S.F. I I I I SW DURAN 1 . II - N / 111 I I 1" = 50' PURCHASED AREA ■ 8121 S.F. VACINIII( MAP 1 I I I ' 1 T.L 900 _ �• __ -_ __ _ -- -- ►•:I _ • I( d t= — zoo— -/ _r c �0 I ...."......7>ne ,11I 0 it 1 �—T —T— T—.---T 00 / MI S—� .. I � LOT Z7 ®'B'' .:. I ' 12.112 F. , * • ' • ..— 45 • kr^ STREET TREES © :� p0 11 ;Al uj f �� ,Ip,OO xpp i /tit LOT 26 �� ' 41'' co di\ . \ ,,,7//\\—._____— R�30., , ` 220+00 PP74. 221+00 � `� � ��/ \ LOT 21 I � I _ • S LOT 25 \ tY I -.41. •11♦ ` \ �. .., -- 200 \ LOT 1 , \\ / 0 -/'r \�i / �� \ \ \ LOT 23 m EXISTING CONDITIONS M g rn F HAMPTON CT. PARTITION z LOT 27 (TL 17,800) „ER �� \ WOW (503)572-1712 FA* 295-2018 TI G A R D, OREGON ENGINEERING N /+ECT MANAGEMENT M COVSWRUCnav MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORP. 0 ''' • • MN • I NM MN NM NM MN MI • • • • • NM • MI I I 1 0. i. N 0 I _ I I 1" = 50' i 1 _ SHARED ACCESS/ SS EASEMENT • 282.60' -- -- I r —63.02• -- 219.68' -- -- _ 30' VISION .�� ��� G� j -0 ,‘ ,. I 45' PUBLIC UMW OAT -CLEARANCE�#�Oy 224+00 — �— - -I I o {; I LOT 28 . � '� �� 4 4. .Y. t •• . :~ , : • .> � I LOT 27 I 11,656 sq.ft. / 9�'�� . /—— co 35' VISION 6,577 eq.tt. IM P�E•� / »• I TMI' v $.*-AS V i \ CLARANCE I / do-�. r \ I 13 ' c,:. p0 / .� '� LOf : \ _LOT::_ x • R•30.00' LAMM' 1-4.74' R-170.00' �t '9 / 220 00� 221+00 _/ _ i LOT 21 c - I f \ / \\ \LOT 25 LOT 1 \ %p \ �Q �� ` ��� LOT 23 \i :\ iii ""ter �, .-� \ \. �/ I = PARTITION PLAT m Z HAMPTON CT. PARTITION z IV LOT 27 (TL 17,800) 1129,0 Esr.FAX 572-1712 , o Q TI G A R D, OREGON EVI IC N PROECT T P � MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORP. s Ca Ca • • E O IMMI N MIMI ME O 1.111 NM O En ME I f \ I I WATER CONSTRUCTION NOTES, OPROPOSED 1' WATER TAP/ME1ER BY CITY. I I ; I • PROPOSED 1' WATER SERVICE SANITARY CONSTRUCTION NOTES II _� 63' I' N 10 PROPOSED e' SEWER TAP 11 g II o PROPOSED 8" SANITARY 0 SL■1.O% III , III 41 ' I I I Ii 1'11" = 50' 0 PROPOSED 18' DRIVEWAY • I I I Ii: I— ----=200-- , 0 PROPOSED >� SW ��,�,�0 a �-L'+'/ 15001011111111 I I � p III � '��T T �-T `� � / �p0 w - ' m I LOTS b' / �'+�'� :..:.io. ai-- � S LOT 20 6 & LOT 26 .7"M ... .° - TO #.I N 004111"1"14111t15.51 / Ir23.18' i / NI,k8' li \ LOT 21 220 000 221+00 '' \ • f— \ w $ LOT 25 � 2� \ LOT 0 ' ,Q III"- /� \�i ->!• r \ i/ LOT 23 b� : 761 . i ,� ` � \mac C/3 CC UTILITY PLAN m "Cl Z HAMPTON CT. EANGLB Z W LOT 27 (TL 17,800) 1129,0 sr. Rae (903)OREGON a N T∎• 210-2058 tbli MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORP. 0 Col • NM MI MN IIIIIIII OM MI MN MN I • NM NS MN NM M IIIIII • 0 I I ° �, N 1" = 50' z I c • -- --�-- -- -- --S -- -- -- v`�_ IL_ — '�' 224+00 I _— __ — --�._._— _ — �_ — -J I ° -= � �► ask°° . . t. .. •• . :. . mt... I LOT 27 j ::..,. >. ...: _ -- J I DOSTING STREET V '` c \ _ LOT 20 •I I / ;�• i LOT 26_.„... • * -- r .., .,. . .. ....:....... , ". Illa t<"46, .6 1;r\ \ / 220+00 00 9 .i LOT 21 rn 221+ ` \ • LOT 25 \ LOT 1 x$ \\ 4 .------- .....---- , —_ \ LOT 23 ilX , ...- \ , , . ,---- , . . . . 1 , - p PLANTING PLAN r$ m ril Z HAMPTON CT. PARTITION z LOT 27 (TL 17,800) ' 11290 SW ST.. o 0 • � � 8 TI G A R D OREGON EN NC M PROJECT 1 ANA T 572-1712 FAX GA MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORP. o IMII 1111111 1111111 I/II M - MN OM - - - - NM - an - NM NM IIIIII RAY R/W P.U.E. I- 60' RIGHT-OF-MAY i 10' II i 2.5' 5.5'+x. 22' 8' EXPOSURE 5:1 Mq � VARIE . M •U I= 1 11_ 11=11=1 a- ::ii 5' SIDEMAUC SAW-CUT UNE 1' OFF DOSING EDGE OF AC MONOLITHIC CONCRETE CROSS SLOPE VARIES BETWEEN 1% - 5% CURB & GUTTER MATCH DOSING MATCH DOSING • COMPACTED SUBGRADE S.W. ROSS (PUBLIC) TYPICAL HALF - STREET SECTION NTS 15' ACCESS EASEMENT 2.5 10' A.C. ACCESS 2.5 MO" ACCESS MO" CROSS SLOPE 2% %i%%%%%,4 /i W ✓i/i/i✓i/i v•;/,;./i AA, • 31 3'CLASS'C'ASPHALTIC CONCRETE 4'MIN.3/4'.O COMPACTED SUB-GRADE AND • CRUSHED ROCK TO 95% MAX DENSITY PASHTO T-99 I SHARED ACCESS EASEMENT SECTION NTS m CROSS-SECTION . , . - m Z HAMPTON CT. PARTITION j �,j. z V1 LOT 27 (TL 17,800) P.O. BOX 1218 M R.712 295-2018 g 'TI G A R D, OREGON EGA�NO M ACT MANAGEMENT'- 0ONS7Rucn�v teg MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORP. 2 4+ E F/ +�-E Tr►wr�u-r►�v Sent by: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 5035319023; 05/21/0 6:36; #347; Page 2/3 I 05/21/2001 1i:52 FATCO 11111/E DEPARTMENT 4 TANASSOURNE NU.*lb Wbldd v / t i r, . / a Naar 1: c e lei; nog er.ro oraysn pew ne.vsn. re ..oe IP STATE OF OREGON li County of ri1harsloe_J o County ARes recording return to: Clark for :+w. 'a.4 ItlSSySw69dr.Ste.140 =tuft',.`• 6i etr,1 Pviitl.OF 97223 1 'rte Vic:;: .` Wits amp is roosted an tax=IM MO IA•'• • Y snail no saw to ate following address: ��,:?'+!! R►, % rector el a • • 1275Sr 6� a 100 Doc : 2001045562 el,OR 97173 — heck: 379827 46.00 05/35/2001 03:45:15pst Escrow No.01060767, ITitle No.9't'i62i IISTATUTORY WARRANTY DEED !Erne V.Schmidt.Rarba 2.GM ant Man'111,McFall.Tin trees of the!o)n-E.Schmidt ar,d Sane V Schmidt Revocable Ltvin? Teust deed ADtil J. 1999, Grantor, conveys and warrants to tajjs I aei4Pl'L'a.°.5�4 o.an Ore�o corporation.Grantee.the following described rest property free of liens and encumbrances,except as specifies/1y set ford:herein: r. As per exlttbit'A'at che4 hereto and now made a part hereof a$ S Thisprapeay is ono of liens and encumbrances.EXCEPT: I l` Easements,Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions of record. if any. ft I s THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT DI VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS, BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT.THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRGTE CITY OR COUNTY I 2 PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. The one Count tatiati for this c nveyaoce is S16.50Q, Nat oosxb' is te.wwesnmaoroas ILC O IDuod this" l-1.- day of " 1-Y% r .._. John E SWIM&Jape V Schmidt Tr By: G• . ,i...iea.J� By:132(517.0_,C4 0/4,.\/4 4, 1 IJim V.Schmidt.Trustee ti 4 " Ratan S.Clik,Trustee 5,-.:,,j7.-':7;v:Mary M ca ,Thax --mat-4A- .: r REAL AMEN N lIsSiS 3t TAX• ,•.....0' 0 ' :E • ' - i'EE PsiO STATE OF Orerarr County of WaaMnPi Its. I 1,1vry- This instrument was acknowledged before me an this!I-day of Ar pry',.2f 1L by Jane V.Schmidt and Barbara J.Clark and McFall.Trustees. • poF1CU�Swot . .i/ 1uAil a LrNN Notary Public for OreSorr : N61lAY P{i4UG OrhECCM `./ OwnS510'40 34233a MY COMMON EXAM Mwi.I.SO , My commission expires: 1 1-2, • FROM :FIRST RMERICRN TITLE • 503 790 7872 2001-29 14:37 $t094 P.06/06 -- f .3. ICider No.810469 ' GAMEST W : i.I tot 81,GOOD ACRES,EEFT the Easterly 8a fast threof,11w Wat fine et aaId eseptton bal0 pet With an 801 dleta nt front(Mien meeeured et riht anes to)the East Ilni of sald Lot a.and all Lots 9 ad t0.OOOACRES.all In the Cowl of weehtgton and Sate of Oregon. EXCEPTING THEREFROM that piton thereof deacdbed In Deed for road right of way re0Orded July I,1500 Ias PO No.Kowwa • FURTHER EfZEPTING THEREFROM that portion thereof deeodbed h Dedication Deed for mad Qurpoees - Jamumy 14,MO ae Fes No.1900487Q. • 1 r 1111 . I • I • in • . I I • 1 ' • I 2._ I • Sent by: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 5035319023; 05/21 /0106:37; #347; Page 3/3 • 05/21/2001 11:52 FATCO �E DEPARTMENT 4 TANASEOURNE NO.796 P003 Order No. 922627 EXHIBIT "A' A 26.00 foot wide strip of land, being a portion of S.W. Ross Street (C.R. No. 1209) as vacated in Document No.99-91538,Washington County Deed Records,situated in the Southwest quarter of Section 12, Township 2 South. Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian. in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, more perticulerty described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 27 of the plat of Hampton Court. Plat Book 129, page 26. Washington County Plat Records; thence leaving the North line of said Lot 27. North 00°37'65' East, 26.00 feet to the Northerly line of that street vacation described in said Document No.99-91538;thence eking said Northerly fine, North 83°2010' East 292.60 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent, 230.00 foot radius curve,concave Southeasterly;thence leaving said Northerly line, along the arc of said curve, concave Southeasterly, through a central angle of 17°37'26' (the long chord of which beers South 68°33'39'West, 70.47 feet), 70.76 feet to the point on the North line of said Lot 27;thence along said North line, South 89°20'10' West. 217.29 feet to the point of beginning. 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 IIFROM :FIRST AMERICAN TITLE • 503 790 7872 2001 -29 14:35 #094 P.02/06 SK AMEX , (, I '� ..:r_', - -la First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon IIWashington(OR) ' Prepared For Prepared BT Customer Service Department 1700 SW Fourth Avenue - Portland,Oregon 97201-5512 Phone:(503)222-3651 Fax: (503)790-7872 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Ref Parcel Number :2S112CB 17800 ' Owner :Matrix Development Corp CoOwner T:02S R:01W S: 12 Q:252 Site Address : 8421 SW Ross St Tigard 97224 Parcel Number :112094759 Mail Address :12755 SW 69Th Ave Tigard Or 97223 Map Number . ITelephone : Owner. Tenant: County :Washington(OR) . SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION ' Transferred Loan Amount Document# Lender . Sale Price . : Loan Type . I Deed Type : Interest Rate : Owned Vesting Type 1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION _ ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION Map Page&Grid :655 F6 . MktLand :$49,500 Census :Tract:308.02 . Block:3 MktStructure : i ' Subdivision/Plat :Hampton Court MktOther . Neighborhood Cd : MkrTotal :$49,500 Land Use : 1002 Vacant,Residential M50Assd Total :$39,640 I Legal :HAMPTON COURT,LOT 27,ACRES:28 %Improved . 00-01 Taxes :$588.38 Exempt Amount : Exempt Type • Levy Code :02374 Ibtillage Rate : 15.0253 IPROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS • Bedrooms LotAcres :28 Year Built Bathrooms Lot SqFt : 12,196 EffYearBlt Heat Method Bsm Fin SqFt Floor Cover . Pool Bsm Unfin SqFt : Foundation . I Appliances Bsm Low SqFt Roof Shape Dishwasher Bldg SqFt .Roof Mat! flood Fan 1st Fir SqFt InteriorMat . ' Deck Upper Fir SqFt : Paving Mall . Garage Type Porch SqFt Cons:Type . Garage SF Attic SgFt Ext Finish . • Deck SqFt . I This title information has been furnished,without charge.In conformance with the guidelines approved by the State of Oregon Insurance Amilmimmimmw Commissioner. The Insurance Division cautions Intermediaries that this service is designed to benefit the ultimate insureds. Indiscriminate use I. only benefiting Intermediaries will not be permitted. Said services may be discontinued. No liability is assumed for any errors in this report LFROM :FIRST AMER ICPN TITLE • 503 790 7872 2001 29 14:35 it094 P.03/06 28 1 12C8 2S 1 12CB y i�y\�.+• ..:•. f: r�':,�' `-•.?,rte'•,'�:.� . `p 7 \ 4. .."1�1.1u�.��`.► �•� •I "` •� 1a9n+ '� wAanlRaroH::ouNtYOn�con ■P i 4 InrW CwlNefCiroM laT7srlw W.N. ra r f • • *.;.'1 _114......,;41ri ;:,--u..f 1., •:'"gth 4,, g....::..;:400....: . -c., �, 23-74 , + o � ;f J r o ....."7" 1 — �.� � r l 91 vnr is a c (CA 1280) 1 //'.e...*:......... Ce9/4 J MX.'*0,...0,.... ., osi2;zr 1 ....f...,m,.,.‹,„:,..,c...q.,.......5,.„ 4 g{ ����� { a s.... 'oa y f A.��..�ri�•{u r r. I�`+ i!�'!'�; nre ! •.w %It :nrJ4.:t.jfi s'IJ,,..•Jd LAM.• J �;'O'�� a 1! 2�U�:t�Sv•..r.I%'�jae:�.i.•.+�opa/%f..✓���./rl.< i r r fO SW NO!WORK LAN& I : — .a ���. `:.w;.'fir••44,4r.. ...in... . lucre ,, •,7 ''''I'' :"... .. s.," ::..l&s.."-*::.:t: ' SW KENTON DANE °�j.4.-., : ;: : "� 2 4,R.1,4i.. 1 _, Itic .+ r:.. ,2, 1V ? ..' ' g'' ..mac;;,a sz;<�e,•E '' pMwfrfgc.snap .t7 •• F + o '....././,'.9-:Y..e. . I dpicitot*,,jare , . „tit.' :via ;riot i ra-s„, r. 4. :i0;0'. ,:. ./x-i-z./..c7:.?-4 ,..7-4-: •• lig, • ' ''', ':....4.,:,..,/,.\.v... _. ... , . , rin a int' '''' b'i - . I :.x.y.,/,..c.-.....,:...x. v' • • ,, •.49... 1 a kill }',y''•p, : S W 00 ' '(�j T O X O I i on, :��' ••� q� 3I r • ISO 1IF t , : , E A r slim_ /,!'.%.f. 1 gtillir �}' °� A , l PIA71rDApTrav2c.2000 ,/� _Y� ASHFORD■∎ B 0 2 .. r rrw�.r.r.r•...rrwr it,A5.2.•:.:.?):: .�S :::1- :;%:. Yr►.wyr 74:! rn•..=. I _r��`"•,:�n''. ����!�1�►Vy+dlri�'. =�ISit'i s����F„�1111:gAtitr:11,..11111sall" � .i:S�."1�..,; 4)• TiGAR1� ZS 1 1 2C 2S 1 12C8 1 • I I . • r • I I IFROM 'FIRST RMERICRN TITLE • 503 790 7872 2001 -29 14:36 `*094 P.04/08 ■ / . \!/. 1, / \ \ / J\ 1 \ • /�0 V / \ i , _ 498.00 _ BEG CR 1290 N :i .4:;- t >• z.>..,:k. .:: I �,, 4 \\\\\ = \\\\\\ .,e \\\\\\\\\\\ ,, o \\\\\\\\\\\\\ b - � �mz3 S a *17800 2 . • • çP4O ' . r� z y 3 iiIP , \ f1 tl b0 I G / 1. 35 A 4.38 . 0 Alp 45' , ; •17 .,Ra75' 17 I \\\\VIN\M\ ,,....ft, SNI\I * .... ,:e • •e: .-•27 // cr''to 't9 15 200 >�, .. � s r r (NI =` .a• �� 1 •o , o '11 9 O ' CC I �;; �`9°'15500 °�' �15400�w.. �s:,1 1 :,� 3 �w 15300 5. ' :�i 45• r 84.14 „ ti i t, 18.96`, 'd` e'- 51.40 _ 78.84 '� r, ,' 3 15600 R�271 •°°- 17900 TRACT "A" I �' o N RF RK In 5 m SViI 0 0 CT I �: 85.27 18.98, �:6:32.85 45.00 58.04 i j �j. 0)o r •c 2e. qll 15700 �,cv5800^ 15900 16000,, ,: 6 7 S 9 l'l) v. N N �'_ �_ __ ,. `► \\\\ 15'' •.• -. • . • 5 : TR°G �I 589-23-00E 13 200 °� 9L00 1 N • • • • m Ir� �.., 13.0 FROM :FIRST AMERICAN TITLE • S03 790 7872 200129 14:37 0094 P.O5/06 • . I10 at/ AMEa/0 ` l l eitt.14. 11ns VACS RI IIRVU010R RI1 *DNRI Wit I lD VITAE OF OREGON County of tfrraahln9ten I Z� �:e�� 1,Jetty {«. •f�.�. 11 �0 A teanftdIng tatum ton Clark e aA r :rr'� • 1+ssa .. 1P M C01 . �maN • ' 111_ ,sw Batlffir Blvd_....��..... .. OODUnl �/�. �;?t r: Fnnt.nd_Ott.--. 9721�.�..M. :.- .' . „:� .• I .•; Until a ahm ge is requested A taut statements �•• d udl se sent to the following address: ry q[ 11� lrootor st b ettilD9Y ICEPtem d1re ak+atYo:1,Ertl • i 111231 B�'""_...igtydr.....� -f Doc t 99079753 ' •I L" 0 .. —•—��� Rect: 234756 666.00 . Endow No.220figali 06/30/1999 1Ot521 00eta i Tide No.881459 • J .. -- - STATUWRY WARRANTY DEED • •. Lw:n B_McDenaf and Menkea Met)eneld.ea tenants 6v t!e entirety.Grantor,conveys and Witt9nfe ' _ to Mat$ Deltelenment CornorVIRO mt Oreeaat- RIRCaod_en, Grantee, the following desaribe4 real A property free of liens and encumbrances,except as apeoMaeUy sac ibtth herein; • as per "A"slushed hereto and now made a part hereof IThis pfopeey to free'of liens and encumbrances,EXCEPT: Statutory powers and astleasmtata of Unified Sewerage Agency;The rights of the public in and to that • portion of the premises becdn described lying within the limits of roads,streets Or highwgye. ' IISM INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF TEE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS • INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OP APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON ACQUIRING PEE TITLE . ITO TAE PROZ'HRTY SI3OULD on= WITH THE APPROPRIATE ari, OR COUNTY• PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. • I The tee consideration for this conveyance is Sciar <QQ pa. a�.m ,vho ua ss.0ORS O Dated this k---).-1 day of. , I 2 I a(411„.7.40_05e„jtri:tzetp Aiti,t4L.,' of A 4,--,--eig---- Dyne B.McDonald Mona R.McDonald ' STATE OF Oregon County of Washington )ss. I This Geetre menu araa acknowledged tbis�?88 day dime, 1949 by Ldmn B.McDonald and Mooiea R. acid. ' - Now Public for Oregon• • • .K; . ; "> ,1);;.if . ``!k My,Cam iselon expires; 'i -;,hJ!« ;1. .7 ; . .-. ..,....7,71:.4...' err`.. . . .. .,,,.011%.,,.) I , .0 IRE PAO oat • • • 1 1`Z. PRE -APPLIcATIoAi COAJFERENCE Notes � PRE-APPLICATION � CONFERENCE NOTES 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . • • .. CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES eirror MAD,' N. Community cDevekrnient ' (Pre=Application Meeting.Notes:;are'Valid for Sin (G) PIonths) • stuz?wgf.BetterCommuiuty RESIDENTIAL PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: r •• m STAFF AT PRE-APP.: 4 APPLICANT: MC.,Cri Y O..' rr AGENT: Phone: (5o'3 ) (02 0 - 10'0 Phone: ( ) PROPERTY LOCATION: ' ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: € Li 2.1 SW S4- / SW Nrc Set S W TAX MAP(S)/LOT#(S): gg 10 f C( I`1, 5f v b NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: 4-- / PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: l I l v\O r ?Gl/3c,-, r`9.. p•dS SSE rust vim}- -t-Or ' 'fJ\- 9 , j?ure Prc,v.&. a� .\r1 � ' Vo,rwt:At . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN . • MAP DESIGNATION: �..+ b Q`x>.A c.Q ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM (C.I.T.) AREA: ,S ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18. 51 e) I 1 MINIMUM LOT SIZE:3; sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: . ? ft. Max. building height: 3 sft. Setbacks: Front t5*-- ft. Side ft. Rear /..5—ft. Corner /O ft. from street. ' MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: gp% Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: 2. %. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) THE. APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE ' APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR, AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and ' the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. • ' NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. ' CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page I of 10 Ae,identul Application/Planning Division Section I • . . • • *. NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.390) The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable I approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. 1 b, IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the I development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize I the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not Iroughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. ACCESS [Refer to Chapters 18.105 and 18.7651 • Minimum number of accesses: / Minimum access width: /5 .r Maximum access width: . Minimum pavement width: / ' . I WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7051 Within all ATTACHED HOUSING (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each residential dwelling SHALL BE CONNECTED BY WALKWAY TO THE VEHICULAR PARKING IAREA, COMMON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION FACILITIES. ..4t-- RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATION (Refer to Code Chapter 18.715)-SEE EXAMPLE BELOW. I The NET RESIDENTIAL UNITS ALLOWED on a particular site may be calculated by dividing the net area of the developable land by the minimum number of square feet required per dwelling unit as specified by the applicable zoning designation. Net development area is calculated-by subtracting I the following land-area(s)from the gross site area: - All sensitive lands areas including: D. Land within the 100-year floodplain; 1 ➢ ➢ Slopes exceeding 25%; Drainageways; and • ➢ Wetlands for the R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 zoning districts. I Public right-of-way dedication: ➢ Single-family allocate 20% of gross acres for public facilities; or ➢ Multi-family allocate 15% of gross acres for public facilities; or 1 ➢ If available, the actual public facility square footage can be used for deduction. • `EXAMPLE OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATIONS: I IEXAMPLE: USING A ONE ACRE SITE IN THE R-12 ZONE(3,050 MINIMUM LOT SIZE)WITH NO DEDUCTION FOR SENSITIVE LANDS Single-Family Multi-Family 1 43 ,560 sq. ft.of gross site area 43,560 sq. ft. of gross site area 8.712 so. ft. (20%)for public right-of-way 6.534 sq.ft. (15%)for public right-of-way NET: 34,848 square feet NET: 37,026 square feet I ± 3.050 (minimum lot area) -,- 3.050(minimum lot area) 11.4 Units Per Acre 12.1 Units Per Acre The Development Code requires that the net site area exist for the next whole dwelling unit.NO ROUNDING UP IS PERMITTED. I *Minimum Project Density Is 80%of the maximum allowed density.TO DETERMINE THIS STANDARD,MULTIPLY THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS BY.8. all OF TIGARD Pre Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 10 I Andeatul AfOcitaa/Plmamg nirv5ga knioa I . • • SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to CI le Section 18.730) ➢ STREETS: feet from the centerline of ' ➢ FLAG LOT: A TEN ( 4)-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK applies to all primary structures. ➢ ZERO LOT LINE •TS: A minimum of a ten (10)-foot separation shall be maintained ' between each dw:'ling unit or garage. ➢ MULTI-FAMILY RE RENTIAL building separation standards apply within multiple-family residential develop •ents. I ACCESSORY STRUCTU S UP TO 528 SQUARE FEET in size may be permitted on lots less than 2.5 acres in size. Fiv- (5)-foot minimum setback from side and rear lot lines. ACCESSORY STRUCTURE UP TO 1,000 SQUARE FEET on parcels of at least 2.5 acres in size. [See applicable zoning district for the primary structures'setback requirements] FLAG LOT BUILDING HT f t I . ' ' s u M HEIG HEI _ - 'PROVIS•F 1I'/z ST•[Re' _er to Code 25 feet: , whichever is ess in most zones; 2 • , .r • - feet in R-7, R-12, R-25 or R-40 zones provided that the standards of Section 18.730.010.C.2 are ' satisfied. BUFF ' ' , AND SCREENING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.1451 In .rder TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE O'' VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the CI REQUIRES LANDSCAPED BUFFER AREAS along certain site perimeters. Required buffer arras are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of de '•uou -•: -' - • -en trees and shrubs and must .lso achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. le obscuring screen, fences •.y also be requires; ese .re often advisable even if not re fired by the C�:xl- The required b► er areas . - only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, nd aIk ays. Additional informatio - -quired buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. '. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.165 and 18.105) • STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- I way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED ' in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. RECYCLING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7551 Applicant should CONT NCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. ocating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two ) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within ' Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. ' art Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 10 Aeudentid Appbution/Plmnint Dvition Seaton 0 0 - "-t PARKING [Refer to Code Chapters 18.765 3,18.7051 I ALL PARKING AREAS AND DRIVEWAYS MUST BE PAVED. ➢ Single-family Requires: One 1 off-street parking space per dwelling unit; and One (1; space per unit less than 500 square feet. I ➢ Multiple-family Requires: 1.25 spaces per unit for 1 bedroom; .. 1.5 spaces per unit for 2 bedrooms; and 1.75 spaces per unit for 3 bedrooms. • - I Multi-family dwelling Units with more than ten (10) required spaces shall provide parking for the use of guests and shall consist of 15% of the total required parking. I NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: - 8 feet. 6 inches X 18 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet. 6 inches X 16 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Handicapped parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to I be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. -A handicapped parking space symbol shall be.painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. I BICYCLE RACKS [Refer to Code Section 18.7651 BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL I DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. I SENSITIVE LANDS [Refer to Code Chapter :.7151 The Code provides REGULA ONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR . DEVELOPMENT DUE To AREAS-. WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL I DRAINAGEWAYS, WET A ND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR• ON UNSTABLE GROUND. ',tall will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference bas=. on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely I identify sensitive land areas. . -• their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitiv= lands must be clearly.indicated on plans submitted with the development application. I Chapter 18.775 also provides r-gulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. 111 STEEP SLOPES [Refer to Code Section 18. .080.01 When STEEP SLOPES exist, p or to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the pproval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code I Section 18.775.080.C. The re ort shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. I UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY(USA)BUFFER ST DARDS [Refer to R&0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 31 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJA NT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buff wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive I area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR DTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table Iidentifies the required widths: I CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 10 Rn demid /% Apphutionannmt Orvitwa t i,oa I TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS . SOURCE: USA DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION -.TANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION & ORDER 96-44 I E - :', ..,... SLOPE ADJACENT.;:" '::"` -:'`WIDTH OF VEGETATED:"' SENSITIVE AREA"DEFINITION TO SENSITIVE AREi44 'CORRIDOR PER 31DESn I • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% 15 feet 10 to <50 acres 25 feet i• •► >50 to <100 acres 1 1 I • Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre feet • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% • 50 feet • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-rou • flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 a • Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% 30 feet + 10 to <50 acres 50 feet >50 to <100 acres _ • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting I • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds point to the top of ravine (break in <25% slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine' I I °Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined cha• el (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds, w ' hever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,s•all not serve as a starting point for measurement. I 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed o when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. °The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top o the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. I Restrictions in the Vegetate Corn.• : NO structures, development, constru ' n activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or o er activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract I from the water quality protection provided •y the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the USA Design and Construction Standards. I Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY' RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP[ NT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such .. a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a I separate tract, and shall not b: a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. USA Service Provider Letter: 6 PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any : se applications, the applicant must obtain a USA Service I Provider Letter which will outline the co ditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are no s: sitive areas, USA must still issue a letter stating a USA Service Provider Letter is not require'. I SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) • SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OB• £INED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Per ' ." handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or I height beyond Code standards may .e permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. A •rnatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. I TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.0 A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a I development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of ID Residential Application/Planning Oivitioo Salina • I THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: • ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated I as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according I to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: • Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a I mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; ♦ Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; I. • Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; • Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no Imitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT I APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. J.MITIGATION (Refer to Code Section 18.190.060.E1 REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. • ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. . I ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: - I • The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be Iviably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property I ➢ or, with the consent of the owner, private property. The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IIN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree Ireplacement. .CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1951 I The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size . of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any Iexisting obstructions within the clear vision area. I CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 10 t ,enpol Applicilao/Plumiag Derision Section II. 0 WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT t . •r to Code Section 18.797.0301 I The WATER RESOURCE (W') OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and 's intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local I Wetlands Inventory. S•ecifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear ant objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in desig ated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; pres-rve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance I fish and wildlife habi'-ts; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: U The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO . AEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "sa - harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions requ' e that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin Rive which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average Iannual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: I Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARI G STREAMS" by the .Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1 100 cubic feet per second (cfs). > Major streams in Tigard include F A NNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH IFORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY 'EEKS) AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARI STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry I maps . Minor streams in Tigard inclu•- Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North • Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tr•utaries of the Tualatin River. I Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORI i ONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANK'., OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater.. The riparian setback i•. the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- I090(1)(d). .. - > The standard TUALATIN R ER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. I > The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARI' SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. > ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MIN•' STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no I riparian setback; however, a 25-foot " :ter quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and .dministered by the City of Tigard. RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTIONS [Refer to Code Section ;.791.100) IThe DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE- 'ECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETB CK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwi-,e prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better I protection for identified major stream r-e•ources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in p eserved portions of the riparian setback area. I Eli•ibilit for Ri•arian Setback in Dist rbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIA , SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substan rally disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based o• the Vegetation Study required by Section. 18.797.100 that I demonstrates all of the following: Native plant species curren ly cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; ➢ The tree canopy currently 'overs less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy I trees have not been remove• from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; • That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.797.100 regulating removal of native plant species; I CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 10 Rnd rcm entul Applon/Phnnme Dimon Section I . • ➢ That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and ➢ The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. I FUTURE STREET.PLAN AND EXTENSION 0 STREETS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.030.FJ FUTURE STREET PLAN hall: . IA ➢ Be filed by the app cant in conjunction with an application for a subdivision or partition. The• plan shall show the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land divis .n and shall include boundaries of the proposed land division and shall Iinclude other parcels w '-', 200 feet surrounding and adjacent to the proposed land division. ➢ Identify existing or propos:d bus routes, pullouts or other transit facilities, bicycle routes and I pedestrian facilities on or ithin 500 feet of the site. Where necessary to give access .r permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed. I ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. I Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. I The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/4 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. I BLOCKS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.0901 --TTe-perimeter of BLOCKS FORMED BY STREETS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1,800 FEET measured along the right-of-way li - _ - - - _ - e- - •■• • •reclud-• • •- al topography, wetlands I or other bog'- .. : vva er or, pre-existing development. When block lengths greater than 330 feet are permitted, pedestrian/bikeways shall be provided through the block. • I . CODE CHAPTERS 18.330(Conditional Use) 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ,C 1 8.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) (Directors Interpretation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) 1 8.775(Sensitive lands Review) I18.340 18.350(Planned Development) _ 1 8.705(Access/Egress/Clrculation) 18.180(Signs) 18.360 (Site Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) 8.370(Variances/Adjustments) X- 18.115(Density Computations) ,C 18.790(Tree Removal) II 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) / -18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) 1 8.725(Environmental Performance Standards) 18.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) 18.798 Wireless Communication facilities) I18.410(lot Line Adjustments) 18.140(Historic Overlay) k 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) ' 18.420(land Partitions) 18.142(Home Occupation Permits) `/ 18.430(Subdivisions) 1 8.145(landscaping&Screening Standards)• I18.51 O(Residential Zoning Districts) 1 8.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) ______ 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) I ._-__..-- 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.160(Nonconforming Situations) I I CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 10 Ae+idearid Application/Pluming Dimion Section ' - • • - ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: I key � ac J �v7 •4- `�.or 46,74- .Z 7 S c ce �/ --/ - i • I41- V S.4 J' •-,.rat -- Z, uz-- ._ • ' . - - - ___ /' - ,--, - fi...„- .'- • • • PROCEDURE I pt_ Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. I Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation-on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. I s `APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be I returned. The Planning counter closes at 4:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), I 81/2' x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the I application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. • IWY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 10 RtSidmtul Appliutwn/PI name Divoaa Section '. • The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal peeiiod follows all use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard is' �G' A basic flow chart which illustrates the review proces avail e7b le rom the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the ' applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. - This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. ' SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION (County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-88841 PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, applicants are required to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name. l Applications will not be accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. �IJILDING PERMITS • PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of ' development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. • ' Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE ' DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE-DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). • PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective. applicant either obtain and read the ' Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A ' PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). 1 . PREPARED BY: i///l' - , Ift■ CITY OF IGARD R!��M' ` ' -~� I LDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4111 FAX: (503) 684-7297 E-MAIL• (naffs first name)@ci.tigard.or.us TITLE 18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE)INTERNET ADDRESS: ci.tigard.or.us ' H:\patty\masters\Pre-App Notes Residential.doc an-2001 Updated: 18-Jan-2001 1 (Engineering section:preapp.eng) ' 0TY Of TIGARO Pre-Application[onference Notes Page I0 of I O Andean/1 Applicuion/P�naat On on ivoo Seam • • CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST I Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application -is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a ' decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. III If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. I Staff: ,.it _ .. Date: �Z1/©3 / I1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: ICompleted Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed I Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed #10 envelopes for all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. I Mailing envelopes shall be standard.legal-size (#10), addressed with 1" x 4" labels (see envelope submittal requirements). Property owner mailing lists must be prepared by the City for a minimal fee (see request for 500' property owner mailing list form). I = Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes IFiling Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED I In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): • Vicinity Map ❑ Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan oilt— Existing Conditions Map ❑ Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan ❑ Site Development Plan ❑ Architectural Drawings I tel Landscape Plan ❑ Sign Drawings _ =EI. Public Improvements/Streets Plan I3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR'-AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES f � COPIES OF IALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 111 . • • 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS IBecause of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: I ❑ Traffic Study _ ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ID ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ID ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other * 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend I and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers. the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 8% x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the Iinformation requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). IVicinity Map Showing the location of the site in relation to: I • Adjacent properties El• Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • - Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • • Transit stops - - - El • Utility access ❑ IExisting Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ IDrainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ I • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ I . Unstable ground LI I • Areas with severe soil erosion potential 0 • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ • Locations of resource areas including: I • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan •❑ • Wetlands LI Other site features: ❑ '. • Rock outcroppings • Trees with>_6"caliper measured 4'from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources ❑ ILocations of existing structures and their uses III Locations of existing utilities and easements City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 I • • Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ ISubdivision Preliminary Plat Map • The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets Q I • Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ • Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided I Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ • Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10%grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ I The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ I • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone transmission lines(50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ I • Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level p • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures I are to remain after platting ❑ • Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions(if any) ❑ I • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ • Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands and marsh areas The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions, and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for I purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ • If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably beshown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ IThe owner's authorized agent 1:1• The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ • Proposed property lines ' Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ Contour lines (2'intervals for slopes 0-10%or 5'for slopes >10%) Location,width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25'of all property lines ❑ I Location and width of all water courses Location of any trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4' above ground level ❑❑ All slopes greater than 25% I = Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ • Any applicable deed restrictions Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ IFuture street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections I City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 I . . • . • • Site Development Plan - IThe proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ • The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: I • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ I • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ I • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ I • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ IThe locations,dimensions and setback distances of the following: . • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25'of the site CI' • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ I • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ • Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ • The locations of the following: . I • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation - ❑ Landscape Plan ILocation of trees to be removed ❑ • Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ • General location, size and species of proposed plan materials 0 I Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ I • Erosion control measures that will be used Ill Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan IProposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ • A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a Ireasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ I I . City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 0 • Grading/Erosion Control Plan I . The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios ❑ IUtilities Plan I . Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans 1:1 Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ IPreliminary Storm Drainage Plan I = The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow l=1 Location,width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ I T ree Preservation/Mitigation Plan I = Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ IArchitectural Drawings • IFloor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use El drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings - I • Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ I Ii:\:curpin\masters\revised\checklist.doc 5-Jun-00 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 y...r_, . .i... .,._.,;:.,.,.;.y.<.•u=`...: ,iC.. .,,:1•..:. -H•' :'.y,.. '.ten _.:!" -_ `!.'•' ,r_y I:w i:�F .Z .X...aC.- . ,ice .7`r,-.� �v'�,:^ _ r r.-,•Fi _.., w, . .._. ...,-. ._.:.�. ...a ..,,r :, , r,.,.." .�- .h -.yl j°• xiF% - :^7 wpr`' s4M14 ' �=;vii,� _ ✓'ip' -X•`'•l•` :'t b 4- h, - l - '.Awr :ttR'r'k' L' - _7 .:, ...f' ,�.M..: , .-... n ...,:••.: .. <�,,.?::iX..n -ss...^:,f.S _ .:J+ :.L,...-,.,�.."C t}�,--:-- :,M .i'. ,.f,,. ..:-fit: ..-$'m. 4` " "tr..,te , i3:: art:: �I n} f i sj <3( !E: .k. a t _ NOTES R�`. "y�- EH ENO '3 E•' ..Pr! C 0 C�O�N I . .'n:�, , :x.•:-"''.��A7;:, ...._ti;vr:.A;:.:;::..,..+ ,i..� -ni" .l. 'Gi P.;..i:., r/..: 4 n. .7, .a, n;!,.. Z'r }..f 'TJ .•kr. .4-' sr rE _ "Yx�+� £ "3�r X. 'tk „m ^� t ,1s jq- =.i - 'mss._ ...� t• w1.• -at .s: - - �.�c :gin �oro ens�;-:: ny. t:''Y -e� f'y-• �TI <N -EN, . E,, N E 0 :� R u ,. �- r�Dez�e�: o .tae t1E <. 1 ._.,. -:. -k ... ,-., ....-_�... ..•^:.. ._, .-_- "r ;.:,".+:::.a....:,; _ ,. iF-r !a3 �..,-"%-jig - 'C;5' a: ' .,... .. __.. , ., ..: ,.,. .__...,. ,•...4.. ., .,..a ,., n.. .. ..d», wT'i " ,, a 7.. , ,z -_. .. ._...: . .n, .,.,_, ,k> .. 4 .-'=.�Yr='- `-z4'i `^,:%7r.. :#" vy?..' r Y.. .,:rr. . ..,-. ",.. ..,..t. .,.> ...1_...... s.. .,..,... .. ,r s ;..Y.:r'> :(s:, �"Z'.E ry^ '�. N'[ '.... t .. _ _.,. . ..> . ., . r. _ - ...._.,, - �.�: {� sSlB`-in .A«;Better-�, X: nom.. .... ... ..... ...,- ... , ...,... .. ,. .... „ ... . ..,.. ... , . : I PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Maptsl: 2S112CB Tax Loan: 11000 IUse Type: MLP The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant Iwill be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned I commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. I Right-of-way dedication: IThe City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as"specified by the Community Development Code; or I (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: I • ❑ SW to feet I ❑ SW to feet • ❑ SW to feet I ❑ SW to feet IStreet improvements: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: I ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb • I ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk I ❑ street trees . ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ICITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applicatlon Conference Notes Page t of 6 Enoloesdot Ieeutme¢tSalley I ❑ Other: • • - • I ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement I ❑ concrete curb . ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities _ I ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees I ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: . . 1 I ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement I ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities I ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees I ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. 0 Other: . I ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: I ❑ feet of pavement . ❑ concrete curb I ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ' _ ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk I - ❑ street trees (l street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. I ❑ Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: I ❑ feet of pavement (1 concrete curb I ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ICITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 togleeerlq DeeertLeotSeetlee ' ❑ street trees • • ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ' ❑ Other: ' Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently I practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement 1 district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) ' (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: ❑ Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines 1 adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines ' are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. ' There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW Prior to , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in- lieu described above. 1 Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located in SW Ross Street. with a 4-inch lateral stubbed to this lot (Lot 27). The proposed development must be connected to a ' public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to extend a new sewer lateral to serve the additional lot. The applicant will need to explore options for obtaining the additional lateral without cutting the street. Water Supply: The City of Tigard (Phone:(503) 639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed ' development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 612-7010] ' provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for ICITY Of TIGARD Pre-AiwlicatIon Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 EngIDeerfe0lepertmeot Sectlee information regarding the dioquacy of circulation systems, teed for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire pro t tion. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed ' to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. 1) Pay the water quantity SDC for the additional lot; 2) Provide a storm drainage plan for the new lot. • ' Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing ' an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. ' Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ' ❑ Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ® Payment of the fee in-lieu. Fee payment for the additional lot. Other Comments: ' All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily ' accessible. I 1) Access will be restricted. Only one driveway onto SW Ross Street will be permitted to serve both lots, and there shall be vehicle tumarounds provided for both, such that cars will be able to pull forward onto SW Ross Street.. I TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected ' impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon ICITY OF Tf6ARD Pre-ApnNcatlon conference Notes Page 4 of 6 EogleeedaIIeoernoeotSectloo I the number of trips which &projected to result from the propoilldevelopment. The calculation of the TIF is based on the pro used use of the land, the size of the Inject, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited ' circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. 1 • Pay TIF for additional lot. I PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: ' Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: 1 Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to ' main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. This type of permit requires a non-refundable $150.00 fee. In certain cases, where City costs may exceed the $150.00 fee, an administrative deposit will be required. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be ' submitted for review and approval. This type of permit requires a deposit to be submitted with the construction plans. The amount of the deposit depends upon the overall value of the public improvements. The City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either ' refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, t or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is ' responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. 1 Building Division Permits: 1 ICITY OF TIGARN Pro-Anplicatlon Conference Notes Page 5 016 Fielueerloo oepertseat Eectlor+ • The following is a brief ovillipw of the type of permits issued ape Building Division. For a more ' detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Mvelopment Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. ' Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot ' grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading • and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. ' Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all ' work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially ' complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. ' Other Permits. There are other permits,special such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing P that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. • 1 I GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS - All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design.engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as ' well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information.will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer ' will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY:__ -C2- 4 4".1 E GINEERING DEP TMENT STAFF ' Phone: (5031639-4111 Fax: [5031664-1291 Iis\eng\brianr\templates\preap notes-eng.dot Revised: April 21,2000 ICITY OFTIMARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Depsitineet Seetion I Z • LU 5 0 Z • O O. v' I • • IHampton Court Total Area Before Vacation= 4.16 Ac. 181,142 sq.ft. Additional Area ' Vacated Area 4,022 sq.ft. Total Area+Additional Area= 4.39 Ac. 191,285 sq.ft. Purchased Area 6,121 sq.ft. Hampton Lot Area Prior to Vacation Hampton Lot Area After Vacation I Lot 1 4,604 Lot 16 5,468 Lot 17 4,346 Lot 1 4,604 Lot 16 5,468 Lot 17 4,346 Lot 2 4,740 Lot 2 4,740 Lot 3 5,849 Lot 18 4,861 Lot 3 5,849 Lot 18 4,861 , Lot 4 6,242 Lot 19 5,574 Lot 4 6,242 Lot 19 5,574 I Lot 5 4,456 Lot 20 6,846 Lot 5 4,456 Lot 20 6,846 Lot 6 6,462 Lot 21 5,144 Lot 6 6,462 Lot 21 5,144 Lot 7 4,479 Lot 22 4,740 Lot 7 4,479 Lot 22 4,740 I Lot 8 3,468 Lot 23 4,244 Lot 8 3,468 Lot 23 4,378 Lot 24 4,244 Lot 9 4,378 Lot 24 5,150 Lot 9 5,150 . Lot 10 3,786 Lot 25 5,555 Lot 10 3,786 Lot 25 5,555 Lot 11 3,452 Lot 26 6,795 Lot 11 3,452 Lot 26 6,795 I Lot 12 3,462 Lot 27 3,473 8,090 Lot 12 3,462 Lot 27 12,112 Lot 13 Lot 13 3,473 Lot 14 3,483 Lot 14 3,483 Lot 15 4,016 Lot 15 4,016 I Total 181,142 Total 185,164 I Dedicated 47,979 Dedicated 47,979 Net 133,163 Net 137,185 Sum of Lot Area= 133,163 Sum of Lot Area= 137,185 I Allowable Lots Allowable Lots Prior to Vacation= 26.63 After Vacation= 27.44 Hampton Lot Area After Vacation Hampton Lot Area After Partion I Lot 1 +Purchase 4,604 Lot 16 4,346 Lot 1 4,604 Lot 16 4,346 Lot 2 5,468 Lot 17 4,740 Lot 2 5,468 Lot 17 4,740 I Lot 3 5,849 Lot 18 4,861 Lot 3 5,849 Lot 18 4,861 Lot 4 6,242 Lot 19 5,574 Lot 4 6,242 Lot 19 5,574 Lot 5 4,456 Lot 20 6,846 Lot 5 4,456 Lot 20 6,846 Lot 6 6,462 Lot 21 5,144 Lot 6 6,462 Lot 21 5,144 I Lot 7 4,479 Lot 22 3,468 Lot 23 4,740 Lot 7 4,479 Lot 22 3,468 Lot 23 4,740 Lot 8 4,244 Lot 8 4,244 Lot 9 4,378 Lot 24 5,150 Lot 9 4,378 Lot 21i: 5,150 Lot 10 3,786 Lot 25 5,555 Lot 10 3,786 Lot 25 5,555 I Lot 11 3,452 Lot 26 6,795 Lot 11 3,452 Lot 26 6,795 Lot 12 3,462 Lot 27 18,233 Lot 12 3,462 Lot 27 6,577 Lot 13 3,473 Lot 13 3,473 Lot 28 11,656 I Lot 14 3,483 Lot 14 3,483 Lot 15 4,016 Lot 15 4,016 I Total 191,285 Total 191,285 Dedicated 47,979 Dedicated 47,979 Net 143,306 Net 143,306 I Sum of Lot Area= 143,306 Sum of Lot Area= 143,306 Allowable Lots After Vacation= 28.66 Lot Average 5118.07 sf I IIN 2S 1 12 B 11 : I ;,. ...,.. .sw 6147w PARK sr a 1 .._,.,..... ,f.:..-v. ,,'>::::::>:::,<:,;•:::-..:::.;;;;--:>:: el ''. :. .::',-: >, •---;.} :.v"..-,, .■>s;-. cl , ,.s...*4.\ga-..., „,-w ....• ,-' c. 1 :........; -...?:;,...m,..:: „ ,,,,,,„,„,„‘„,,„„„„,,,.„„.--,g,„„„„,„„_,,,,,„„„,„,„ . , ....,,,.....,.,• .,.,.; -..,..! .:,;,. .‘,_..... •-•,-..<- ‘'.=‘,.#1... ,,,..,.<,%,: .. ,.....-2-:, ,,,,,-, ,,',...;'...;,..,,,,,-, A Ahi'efi 444' 1 5.12 AC (h_ : ...... ••" x• . •.... .,,e iti YIKON1110111M.Eal, IMO 131- 3.,..31 3 , m, ......._ SOUTH We Ataill it ISICICUPLEW.S . • ,6 . ' ....,.0 \/. ;z -4 ::•• z ,•••,...ivra• x 700 .•!' "::' :-'" ::::‘-14,•,) a 1 .4 .J. ,, g ' - .4. \ < . WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON 1 Cr 4.P.-'"-4Y. -- ' . .../ r. ,., . .._ . , ' 5 - -I 23-74 '. '21.31 -10. • , 12700 2 ague .. \1 - • NW1/4 SW1/4 SECT1014 12 TZS R1W W.M. 8CAIE 1'..100' eforer,er,:00-Arn?rfroio, .. ., .....,,,,,,.„..,,,,,,,, p .., . .. ...„.. .,:., ,. VAC:47E099.0153g er .. _. . 0044 lam ne6 3 . '''''''''"4*.'''''‘ '''‘‘ums\ss\\`‘‘%\\Ns\\‘‘V‘‘‹ ' `," ""`""`"•\`‘\`‘`‘‘‘‘\‘‘`‘`‘`‘`x\'‘‘,s‘s\\\‘, -E _,,,„ss,,ssso (CRI290) , 1 0 ".:5: :.:2:. .<,,7, ::7*7.7 '07 K.•:i VI■:•7;t7i4.:•7•N•.;1 Fee, ''.. '' '`• '", - '"x.,`‘-'•."..•-'.• ,'," x K ..., ‘., '.. ;',•7's•?' re*r4744".•••■-•-.4r,e'474-41,4i :".s.,:4••"<)''.."‘?\:%,./1:.2A':-;.. .%,‘' i40,gKOrl ■.4ri, •,•-•,,,--..--,-.,,- ..,,,,, -., ,,,, 00A....,......,...,...m....... fr. ...• _„,•• .... .. • . ,,,,,,:-..,:. ,•••:,..„-,..,,•••--, • . 71,T • yk , .... 4, ., 4,: 07a .‘: *.. ---,... ,.... . '.'*:••':.':":^...4%:':'''•-•;Y:‘2.':.7:.‘•'' /4,2Y3V):V,40ViCt":01141 ‘,• ); :, .., ‘,.. ‘...Ail V. V3 1 • :". trip? :i. ,„„ „ .„mu„ ,„, ,, . :, '.. A..:,,r,,;,,...y,„•.,, r 4 11,■•■Vit,t,,b,.,•■■••■■•■■,,,,,y.er,o, , t ' ' "` 8 < 1 10. 1 ' •. '.'.'' A=... -'",.",'" 0,; 4-V4-?...XO: 14,..N.,-,erf, .,,,,..,%..,c.-.,,,..,,,,, ,:.,,,.,,,,. .,,,,.........0...,...............0............OP 4 \SEIss,"\s,,,,\,,\‘``,,\MIM'N,,?'-• VA, . .- .".1'1,,t., S- 1717C0- t' ICI° II R ' ler - " = .:,ti it7.g..01.7' 900 6. ,A_ '. .., 1."'..w.r.**,‘',...:_,'•, ' C4 . ,. - ....- 3303 1603 **Is triir‘ 1 fai.- a ,"7. .__72.4.__-.. 7 1----- - ,,,:, . ,',-;,,,:;•: , ::::::,,, x, irPree4.0:4$to:i:!•:,,t1 i....1.41■4;:,:4;..:,..i:9,.!i:!1.._f...ift.i4,::::;,...:_yi: • .4,,,,,..d,,;:r _,....-•,.. .,, ' NU ' ' . () 1 p , --, • :‘,y,,,x, :<.,, :•:,,,A.,•.•-•.. r .r4orMr.fOrer.irrge ' --- -=2---- -- '-': .:.:446,:Ae 04.09.40'6116a04104.416.2 LANE 4." ','". '''' -'1 5 . 4 ,., , Isi; . :..„. . +L. ill:l,...12.!".9'.. SW NORFOLK.LANE 402 (.J• *3 ... . .111i;i:\ . '. x s..-.,.; ., FOR ADDMIOnNaiAnL a aMsaPaS h VaIlSelT oa OaM r.0 Wa EENTEAT 24 4 ..sr : glAc °.3 1 ADAC ' win g V° -1."liottN°3 la <3 ''',,x-:"...."•,, ..,',/,..,-,..'),:'•,, ",;,:::<:,`,f.),''',."=.`;.';',:. '',..-.:',";:-'.'.=:;;?:,, rb#::k".1 cr ,,,-. , AN.\:- ,,,,,;,.. ----, - •"-- ,,,... - . 4,'-: -,;',. -*::- -4:':\ ,••••: .•-•,"' --,' --"-'4,\s• --- ,,.., - . - ,- --- -• --- •!c.e...N.•-•'s, -i-,'.' .':-:16.a...... ..-..'r' >,,,,,..,,, ...:,„,,, ,,,,.,„:,,,,,,i,,,t.,,,,,,,,,,:,„, •,i.•. '' '.. I.. ';::26.::: 11 - 13,M 12900 ,;, - ::...mg 8303 NCO SEC moo g000 etoo a 9200 1, " Isaacs 1 gm e 9900'''''./ !". :4111<sl ..'tilakf''''''''"n", ''''''-: 09 1 17 1 ono 1 ail to41 loe I loo -o cal Ire??i 100 g no 4tnoo ' ...‘-:': '''-...11‘4)'"•....' .' ..., ':''';',.:',., ,,,':<•-•::.',.:`,.,V-1/44.. .■'g'.';:' 2 ^.2..• LANE to „„.„, -j LANE q':*?;';'‘''*:(•-":',,40),:71,0;:': -,..:-.. '%.,;., vf-...,„.:c.,•,. o ..P. 0. ca ;t,,,:01:,.. :,•;.:014; ,`.;',./±,,OS.?; ',•:10: .' '.e .1.; re 134,1* ' a ! a SW KENTON i 4 DRIVE a a .1;'„, :''. . •2.12' °:.,i It° .1! 1%1°1 In lee.1:.• ••I Val Thet3 i 1 UT 1 "It° . -17**-eit° '],, ... s 4q;:: :.ee 771 nel 77.....1-4... .>. ?:'.....„I. '3e1°•° i •- -- ': .. . 11m20a 0 g 1 jrie i 2 i , -- 1430 ' " , ... ' ' eR Z r ;.:k-.;.-.:, ...; .•„- T:`u....?b:.'e.s.'P,.1on 211E. •.: onmanomaknomotomonanco.not . 2 :I V° ''; nig° 81.301 so; If , li 1342° -..,....... -„• m .: ,:,,,ifir„• - I . . etoo g ..... mg0 g MOO g g 102C0 ':,',,:.Vs:, I''' 'L'••". • ,-.7.Y. I .1 ince 14000 ''... * s 1 11 ur -. ,... . ., UJ •,:,-,,,,:;.,,,;,-,1,...<„....:,...:,,,,,c; 1.. . ...... . 3 am 1- 7/C° i 1 le3C2* 1 11arg 1 le 1 lir -i•-s. - , .:4,5:.\ •,..?!..:.,, . ...• ,,- LL, 70 86 . ...„ ,__. .-s/.. ..."/‘', I t „00 f 4 C.) '--,.4. - -"--4 1 '7 i ,,71'7,54, Co . 66 001 ... je, 77 1 1 "X 1 i llr 172 1 _...., g. . , .. , .• • ,..„ ........„, .r, 5200 . VI 4 to - too • 1 417 1, VIC4*' IY ..•Y. ‘` 's /,-.......,•), Assessment • 66 en° 1 i 134 . 121 . .:'•.' ' 1 :22. .:.. ,::;>::‘,.:..','•::::,:'2/.:',.;::.:: _ El, .4. .• • 44-6.14 ... , .. e.. ..-- ,..../,..'•...•.•''•.'s••"•,' " :1 4 SW 1 • ... 44 - 1 sfec i °2 1 IT 1 war tve , ... '1-1-- ... 4 i STREET 4 klki.7.- 7cax „; .210 111 4000l 4,4" "" , 60 ei.... ,, ,____. _me_ um ....S. W. .... :,.,..7,,,IW •' ,--,7., - . ... ',. PLOT DATE:March 29,2001 38001 37066 9000 1 iri . lera - 1 11"° loco 0.' '',;' ,1 .'%.-, '''..•i.., • F°Skfg i'i e4 frrs 02 ° iT-° 00 a...4L-* . . - ' ',r 144-" *en ‘‘,,' ./181 0 '...I - •'• • ,•,„ •„ - AP R ASHFORD 4 N 0 , -,) ,... . , 30 ., ..,, ,.: . ._.\ . , , ,,‹ lepe..agemomayezaz=7..097:emei ':-: :.: :.: '.,; ',);',::::;.:".. , •-• - f... i ,6,4 a ..., ... aUX 10.03 1 =NC 10.00 4u. -ir.0 \i::::'ir,.;C:‘;',:::::‘,,,',,..‘,"•:,...... .. ".'n."Xtc=•1112.RIM COIMINO fipTfelpniP .... ‘ .42/4 ' 1300 a IA,. - ,\I■%'• ,' „.: ..,,,• , 1300 ..:',./.•./.,,,''',4-$‘`‘,.,:\/:\/: TIGARD 04231w12 2S 1 12CB 2S 112CB ' , II VA • • . , • I ilkt..„,,J,J,1: 1120 DAYS=4/29/99 .:4 CITY of nCiARD Community(Development I Shaping.)Better Community CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon I NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO. 99-01 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION • ICase Number(s): SUBDIVISION ISM)98-0013/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(PDR) 98-0011 Case Name: ELDERBERRY SQUARE SUBDIVISION IName of Owners: Monica and Lynn McDonald Name of Applicant: Matrix Development Corporation -Contact Larry York Address of Applicant: 11130 SW Barbur Boulevard. Portland. Oregon 97219 IAddress of Property: 8340 SW Ross Street Tax Map/Lot Nos.: WCTM 2S1012CB, Tax Lots 00800, 01000 and 01001. Request: > The Planning Commission held public hearings on both•March 1, 1999 and April 5, I 1999 at 7:30 PM. At the close of the April 5, 1999 Public Hearing, the Planning Commission voted to APPROVE subject to the conditions recommended by staff and with one (1) additional Condition of Approval incorporated herein as Condition of I Approval #6b, a request for preliminary plat approval for a 27-lot Subdivision with a Planned Development (PD) Overlay Zone Change and concurrent PD Concept Plan approval. The Concept Plan proposes 27-lots for single-family dwellings ranging in size from 3,527 square Ifeet to 7,621 square feet. Zone: • Single-Family Medium Density Residential — 5,000 Square Feet Attached Per Unit, 7 Units IPer Acre; R-7. - Action: > ❑ Approval as Requested © Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial INotice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: © Owners of Record Within the Required Distance © Affected Government Agencies Ic3 The Affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator© The Applicants and Owners Final Decision: I THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON APRIL 14, 1999 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON APRIL 29, 1999 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: , The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with Istanding s provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.04 G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the require fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the Idecision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. ,.............i I THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 3:30 PM ON APRIL 28, 1999. IQuestions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at(503) 639-4171. SUB 98-0013/PDR 98-0011 NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO.99-01 PC ELDERBERRY SQUARE SUBDIVISION 3/1/99,Cont'd.to 4/5/99 PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING • • • �x3 S'�2"���.' tiAgr4ys+t sc ,l' ,.^`S Tz„.�,..�x7:.;,...^�" �' tsnr 7*�i��ay�" e�f��a7t�il-r"z. .�fi��syY'.r1 J 2.=F I '..w 1°^ r�in C i ,pfd- t �'q�i Z l�S,r,�.Y 40 `r ,Y� f j.F ,,.i.i. k i 4' -.r:4 s4 x T' r,�. ,�.0 C t< ° -;-:'-=,;f 's{ aC ' w :�f"! ..: fib,a..3 c h r.«�.F 1:? 74.r,�aFr::Y' .L t�ti}5, ,- y ly�"i'CS''^''raz a't4'� ,adz.- A� f nL5' z t.sa r r#1.,..,} v fl a c `mot ,5.? .sxs+ r'� , s3 a P` �i' I I �,1 i 0�j :.•` .JS..-u �.,-rt F uel .� .-;:c.., J s � ���� � a� .�-� ��� �A�. y,�• � ,� �::�,. :.�� Y.� � , k firr of noaRO ,� ?,. `'C ""�- :S`., >., 'a"a•`�..s�,rz"""-.rt. ,f i e r f( I ..J .� ,s7t z«'y++k; z .�..»•,;: ,� �1 v? "' u£Fr" � i e i ti Ns t 2 erg °� 1t1 ft,! 4 L ,. a 120 DAYS = 4/29/99 I SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY I CASES: - ELDERBERRY SQUARE SUBDIVISION • Subdivision . SUB 98-0013 Planned Development Review PDR 98-0011 IPROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval of the following land use applications: 1. Subdivision approval for 27, single-family home sites on a 4.2 acre site; 2. Planned Development (PD) Overlay zone change approval; and 3. PD Concept Plan approval to develop lots ranging in size from 3,527 to 7,621 Isquare feet, whereas, the code requires 5,000 square foot lot sizes in the R-7 zone. APPLICANT: Matrix Development Corp. AGENT: WRG Design Inc. I Attn: Larry York Attn: Mimi Doukas 11130 SW Barbur Boulevard 10450 SW Nimbus Ave., Suite RA Portland, OR 97219 Portland, OR 97223 IOWNERS: Monica & Lynn McDonald 8340 SW Ross Street I Tigard, OR 97224 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential (7 - 12 Units per Acre). ZONING • I DESIGNATION:•R-7; Single-family Residential (7 Units per Acre). LOCATION: The subject parcels are located east of SW Hall Boulevard at its intersection with SW Ross Street; WCTM 2S112CB, Tax,Lots 800, 1000 & 1001. IAPPLICABLE . REVIEW . I CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.390 (Decision Making Procedures), 18.350 (Planned Development), 18.430 (Subdivisions), 18.510 (Residential Zoning Eistricts), 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation), 18.715 (Density Computations), 18.730 (Exceptions to Development Standards), 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening), 18.765 (Off-Street Parking), 18.780 (Signs),. 18.790 (Tree Removal), 18.795 (Visual Clearance Areas) and 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). I • SECTION II. DECISION I tiM'IKMr VW74 Or-'Y 'fP,7. : � �,•..u: r. i .L :,. '. r-; ',,'z i7 `gym"sc "is , ,1r. 17.t t� .Z "_ xur4,4 ,�1"L' •-,!' Notice eis , a © .�:en% hat p- c' _ T and ° a ni g; o o, is le,!,fy.;a PP c,®V D e o ,o o o sa;:d Yd .'; r'.. n $ q 4 y{ _„�. ` :,�t aa.. ,�,�'sc �`xn7r4 rr - ,r s''"0.A•1944.10,°72.' ' u 0 c t -t,,-':,,co' n o o,s ® pproval The fiQa irko s a a conclus on on ed :i r if �i '.•t'x,:°^ ' n7 v-6 f -n PP are.noted n Se n 1Vf nalR.. o e ; �< ' �-;.4�" «. , PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-01 PC(From 3/1/99 Public Hearing Continued to 4/5/99) PAGE 1 OF 22 SUB 98-0013/PDR 98-0011-ELDERBERRY SQUARE SUBDIVISION •� V • • O CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I 147 �..� i;�.r � 't 7��"C";1:37 577: 17,x�r�-d''-s.z .� !�„•�F,r�'sx . ;-r- �arm. �t `�til'�fi. +�.#t?"\r, ��'i3 ... .I � �. .; r © � �Y ti'q ,';-� ' :s"A`'.3. :�.r r Mt r r a,a 4r t F E D y 'wtz24 ;s 14� 3 ^4.,. .�F n,x.s3R.,F7,}' f. ,9, ^�9 , m ' n t s �,, ti rry' x rya#. 7, w x ;:.��1 � ' � '1 � V tFI E„ �� :s ,.a�h J r' ,xx yp �..,�. -r °.. ^W3; �� �� �• � e f+�- ��v�ta.rr��^ � -�t3:rc ;�, ,� �,�s�w` el- µ >. hi , ` ' ' '. 44 ��a�. -..'' x�rs;•z� L� �•:4s. b a-3:_., ;�i �. ..,err-' tip^- �Y_�', .� w-�^w�- � k” �� � x,: in c"'-an o p 1. so' ' P« �. r�,wA',z3. C`'...`+'?^ ».t.5.../Cc r, ..CFFtr' ''r�tix r•-• s :.> v ��`'".3.:: I 1. The applicant shall submit revised plans and supporting documentation as per Conditions of Approval 2-6 for review and approval by the Planning Division. All required revisions shall be approved prior to final plat approval. Staff Contact: Mark J. Roberts. I2. Submit a revised Preliminary Plat that indicates all applicable setbacks, on a lot-specific basis. Staff Contact: Mark J. Roberts. I 3. Submit a revised the Tree Removal Plan and tree mitigation plan that clarifies the conflict in the previously submitted application materials as outlined in this staff report. The mitigation plan shall specify the total inches of trees to be removed and a program for mitigation in ' compliance with Section 18.790.030.B. Staff Contact: Mark J. Roberts. 4. The revised preliminary plat shall indicate that adequate corner radius dimensions are I S. provided for emergency access. Staff Contact: Jim Funk The revised Landscape Plan shall clearly indicate the areas of the site to be landscaped and shall demonstrate that all required landscaping will be accomplished on-site and not, for example, in dedicated right-of-way. Staff Contact: Mark J. Roberts. 6a. The revised plat shall conform to the City's right-of-way standards and the allowable density for the site. The applicant shall submit supporting trip generation data regarding proposed right- of-way widths and a revised density computation that reflects the revised right-of-way dedications and revised net site area. The revised plat shall conform to the maximum allowed density for the site and shall not deviate substantially from the existing proposed subdivision I. layout. A substantial deviation would not include adjustment of common lot lines, but may include realignment of internal streets. I 6b. The approved density for the Preliminary Plat is 26 units. The preliminary plat shall be revised to show no more than 26 lots. If, after completion of the vacation process for the "old" Ross Street right-of-way, the applicant demonstrates that the net site area yields additional density units, the ' preliminary plat may be revised prior to final plat review. The maximum additional density shall be 2 units, for a total of 28 units, and the maximum number of lots shall be 27. Lot#27 may be a duplex lot if the density calculation yields 28 units and Lot #27 is at least 10,000 square feet in ' size. 7. Prior to approval of the final plat, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction ' drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall then submit nine ' (9) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall. 8. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be ' responsible for executing the compliance agreement and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. IPLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-01 PC(From 3/1/99 Public Hearing Continued to 4/5/99) PAGE 2 OF 22 SUB 98-0013/PDR 98-0011-ELDERBERRY SQUARE SUBDIVISION is J� • • /'g. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the I construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. . 10. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$810. I 11. The right-of-way width of SW 84th Avenue shall be 50 feet. . 12. The right-of-way widths of SW Tanoak Lane and SW 83`' Avenue shall be 46 feet. The City may Iapprove 42-foot right-of-way and 24 feet curb-to-curb for these streets if the applicant's can show that less than 200 Average Daily Trips will utilize these streets. The applicant must account for future development on neighboring property in generating this data. I 13. "No Parking" signs shall be installed on one (1) side of SW Tanoak Street and SW 83`d Avenue. 14. A full-width improved street along the frontage of SW Ross Street adjacent to Lot 27 (between I Hall Boulevard and SW 84' Avenue) must be in place or assured. The street must meet the minor collector street standards and shall include: A. City standard pavement section curb-to-curb equal to 40 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; I D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5-foot concrete sidewalks on both sides of street; street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements; IF. G. street striping; • H. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer, underground utilities; II.J. street signs; K. driveway apron for Lot 27; and L. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Ross Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 15. A 3/-width improved street must be in place or assured along the frontage of SW Ross Street, from SW 84th Avenue to the east end of the site. The improvements adjacent to-this site shall I include: A. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 20 feet, plus at least 8 feet of pavement on the north side of the centerline such that the overall paved width will be 28 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall b.e built beyond the site frontage; IC. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5 foot concrete sidewalk; I F. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer, I. underground utilities; J. street signs; and K. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Ross Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. I16. A half-street improvement in SW Hall Boulevard shall be in place or assured in accordance with ODOT standards. IPLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-01 PC(From 3/1/99 Public Hearing Continued to 4/5/99) PAGE 3 OF 22 SUB 98-0013/PDR 98-0011-ELDERBERRY SQUARE SUBDIVISION .17. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform woe' ' within the right-of-way of SW Hall Boulevard A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit. 18.• Full width street improvements, including traffic control devices, mailbox clusters, concrete sidewalks, driveway aprons, curbs, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed within the interior subdivision ' streets. improvements shall be designed and constructed to local street.standards. 19. If the applicant chooses to reduce the pavement width of SW 84th Avenue to 32 feet through this site, they shall provide a transition section from the end of the existing improvements with ' appropriately designed tapers. 20. Profile of'SW Ross Street shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. ' 21. Lots 4, 5, 6 and 27 shall not be permitted to access directly onto SW Hall Boulevard. • I 22. Lots 1, 3, 4, 19, 20 and 26 shall not be permitted to access directly onto SW Ross Street. 23. Access to Lot 27 is permitted from SW Ross Street. However, the applicant shall provide to the City Engineer a plan for the driveway into this lot prior to approval of the final plat. The driveway ' shall be designed with a turnaround so that vehicles exiting the site can pull forward onto SW Ross Street and not be forced to back out onto the street. ' 24. The applicant shall place a note or plat restriction on the final plat indicating that only lot #s 3-8 will take access from the private street (shown as Elderberry Court). Only 6 lots may be permitted to take access from the private street. ' 25. The applicant shall cause a statement to be placed on the final'plat to indicate that the proposed private street will be jointly owned and maintained by the private property owners who abut and take access from it. I26. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall prepare Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions (CC&R's) for this project, to be recorded with the final plat, than clearly lays out a ' maintenance plan and agreement for the proposed private street. The CC&R's shall obligate the private property owners within the subdivision to create a homeowner's association to ensure regulation of maintenance for the street. The applicant shall submit a copy of the CC&R's to the ' Engineering Department (Brian Rager) prior to approval of the final plat. 27. The pavement and rock section of the proposed private street shall meet the City's public street standards for a local residential street. I28. Any extension of public water lines shall be. shown on the proposed public improvement construction drawings and shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Water Department, as a part of the Engineering Department plan review. NOTE: An estimated 12% of the water system costs must be on deposit with the Water Department prior to approval of the public improvement plans from the Engineering Department and construction of public water lines. I29. The proposed water main in SW Ross Street shall be extended from the main line in SW Hall Boulevard to tie into the existing 8-inch main line located within SW Ross Street just to the east of Ithe subject site. 30. The applicant shall extend 8-inch public sanitary sewer lines within the street improvements as shown on the preliminary plan to provide sewer availability to adjacent unsewered parcels. PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-01 PC(From 3/1/99 Public Hearing Continued to 4/5/99) • PAGE 4 OF 22 SUB 98-0013/PDR 98-0011-ELDERBERRY SQUARE SUBDIVISION Ilka..9z• • .Z. -.7 • 31. The applicant's storm drainage construction plan shall provide fora public storm line in SW Ross Street that will be extended to the northerly side of the road to pick up the drainage currently collecting at the existing drywell on that side of the road. The applicant will be required to physically convey the storm water on the north side of the roadway into the proposed storm drainage system in this project. This may involve intercepting any storm line(s)that currently flow ,. into the drywell. An area drain may also be needed at that location to facilitate continued collection of surface water that may collect at that location. The City Engineer will need to review and approve the final design for this provision prior to construction. 32. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility. The fee is based on the total area of new impervious surfaces in the proposed development, which includes the new public street and sidewalk areas. In addition, a I standard value of 2,640 square feet of hard surface is assessed to each individual lot. Payment of the fee can be split into two parts: 1) the portion based on surface area of new streets and sidewalk shall be paid by the applicant prior to approval of the final plat, 2) the portion assessed Ito each lot ($210/lot at present) can be paid at the time building permits are issued for the individual lots. The applicant shall provide the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) with surface area calculations for the streets and sidewalk in order for the fee under "1)" above to.be calculated. I 33. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." I34. A final grading plan shall be submitted showing the existing and proposed contours. The plan shall detail the provisions for surface drainage of the lots, and show that they will be "pad" graded_ insure that the drainage is directed to the street or a public facility approved by the Engineering Ito Department. A soils report shall be provided detailing the soil compaction requirements consistent with the requirements of Appendix Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code (UBC). I 35. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 Iper lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $8,525 and it shall be paid prior to approval of the final plat. I 1 f + t�J� .,,c,11.,,,.;- ,..P>. Ltf"'b �� : '4 �J.h�H l•-,,.39 -,P '7-4,—.1.x-,44,,, t1l .s%t�. "'>C I S 0 4 E4 s®R _ ( , ,,,,, .,-'k, i ,�i 3y� t e�: "k. . Fy�+�w;,r���`" �� 4'������a- �< .,ic'.r.„.:. .,. .. �,. ,zi ,.�s.� , .�^-. ... s ...+.�S7x'6,u.K'.,,.,i"`,'+•�.�-- .. ,,.. ,..§K� 36. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a recorded mylar copy of the subdivision/partition plat. I37. Prior to issuance of any building permits within the subdivision, the public improvements shall be deemed substantially complete by the City Engineer. Substantial completion shall be when: 1) all utilities are installed and inspected for compliance, including franchise utilities, 2) all local Iresidential streets have at least one lift of asphalt, 3) any off-site street and/or utility improvements are completely finished, and 4)all street lights are installed and ready to be energized. I .Au.— 1'.. . ,G s er .� e .Sae; i4i, ,.,.:r: +�. ..': ,cs .. Iry imr?,t.!' ,`7 f g r `2 '. .}.�. K.. �n i . N DD fI C HE YPP-L A�'T�SH.O L® BE t . REEF TH r- n r w mss.: ,, x_. � - x. , F _. < r a t ® © ING SECTIO.,. ° r . K E CO MU TYL r EVVB z fr, EN O 5 _ �l u P; r0:.:4' . .31. WiZT S 5. 'OT ANA.,;:L S I ST L� . r , 4 F I • fl,= � ^✓ .4 _.,vn YJr��w.+"^; .. .f . ..k.. 7'% •^^' Yw s� r Y. -. 1. '` • 18.430.080 Improvement Agreement: IBefore City approval is certified on the final plat, and before approved construction plans are issued by the City, the Subdivider shall: ' PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.99-01 PC(From 3/1/99 Public Hearing Continued to 4/5/99) PAGE 5 OF 22 SUB 98-0013/PDR 98-0011-ELDERBERRY SQUARE SUBDIVISION