Loading...
MLP2000-00008 , &PZ000 0000 g' 2:441111, CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community `D= PROPOSAL°`DESCRIPTION- ,:_ ;;.. :LAN USE 120 DAYS = 12/12/2000 FILE NO.: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2000-00008 FILE TITLE: LONDBERG PARTITION APPLICANT: Ken Sandblast OWNER: Roger Londberrq and Kari Noss Land Solutions, Inc. 15215 SW 100 Avenue PO Box 38 Tigard, OR 97224 Clackamas, OR 97015 PHONE/FAX: 722-8585 670-7053 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting to partition one (1) existing lot of 22,651 square feet into two (2) lots of 10,046 and 12, 427 square feet. LOCATION: 15215 SW 100th Avenue; WCTM 2S111 CB, Tax Lot 1714. ZONE: Single-Family Residential (10,000 Square Feet); R-3.5. The purpose of the R-3.5 zoning district is to establish large urban residential home sites. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.765, 18.790, CRITERIA: 18.795, and 18.810. CIT AREA: South CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ® TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: AUGUST 15, 2000 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: AUGUST 29, 2000 ❑HEARINGS OFFICER [MONJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 1:00 PM ❑PLANNING COMMISSION [MONJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 1:30 PM ❑CITY COUNCIL RUESJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 1:30 PM STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER 12, 2000 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION ® VICINITY MAP ❑ LANDSCAPING PLAN ❑ ARBORIST REPORT • SITE PLAN ❑ ARCHITECTURAL PLAN ❑ TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ® NARRATIVE E GEOTECH REPORT ❑ OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheideqger, Assistant Planner (503) 639-4171 Ext. 317 • • NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION .MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2000-00008 CITY OF TIGARD-. - " - Gommty Development LONDBERG PARTITION Shaping A Better ;-Community 120 DAYS = 12/12/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: LONDBERG PARTITION CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2000-00008 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting to partition one (1) existing lot of 22,651 square feet into two (2) lots of 10,046 and 12,427 square feet. APPLICANT: Ken Sandblast. Land Solutions, Inc. PO Box 38 Tigard, OR 97015 OWNER: Roger Londberr and Kari Nass 15215 SW 100 Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 ZONING DESIGNATION: R-3.5; The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached , single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. LOCATION: 15215 SW 100th Avenue; WCTM 2S111CB, Tax Lot 01714. • PROPOSED PARCEL 1: 10,046 Square Feet. PROPOSED PARCEL 2: 12,427 Square Feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390 (Decision-Making Procedures); 18.420 (Land Partitions); 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation); 18.715 (Density Computations); 18.790 (Tree Removal); 18.795 (Visual Clearance); 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision:istased are.noted-in Section V. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00008/LONDBERGPARTITION PAGE 1 OF 11 I • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL .y, ���ry �., ".?:.-a'.' :.Sri, � _:oz+,• ;,�.. T,�-:>,, PRIOR TO THE aAPPROVAL°OF==THE-FINAL�PARTITION:PLAV'"'.� THE FOLLOWING.CONDITIONS.SHALL BE SATISFIED:` _; Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318)for review and approval: 1. A Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the roadway work and sanitary sewer tap in SW 100 Avenue. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement(if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements.. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 3. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30.00. 4. The applicant's public impmrovement construction plans shall indicate that they will make roadway improvements to SW 100 Avenue adjacent to their site to provide the following: A. removal and replacement of existing pavement section such that the resulting paved width of the roadway is 28 feet; B. establish a three-foot wide rock shoulder adjacent to the new edge of pavement; and C. modify the existing roadside drainage ditch if necessary. 5. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 100th Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $5,225.00 and it shall be paid prior to approval of the final plat. 6. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to . the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. 7. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. C. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive a letter from the City Engineering Department indicating: 1) that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor, and 2) that the applicant has either completed any public improvements associated with the project, or has at least obtained the necessary public improvement permit from the City to complete the work. D. Once the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer's signature. ' NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00008/LONDBERGPARTITION PAGE 2 OF 11 • y • • THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS`SHALL BE-SATISFIED ` y. '3 :_ - * , PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. ' - Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 8. The applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a mylar copy of the recorded final plat. 9. Prior to issuance of the building permit for Parcel 1, the applicant shall pay the standard water quality fee per lot (fee amount will be the latest approved by USA). 5~° THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF,EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE=DATE'OF.THIS DECISION NOTED UNDER THE PROCESS AND APPEAL SECTION OF.THIS DECISION. : .. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION - Property History: The subject parcel is located within the City of Tigard. The property is designated Low-Density Residential on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map. No previous land use actions for this parcel appear in the City's land use records. Site Information and Proposal Descriptions The subject property is approximately 22,651 square feet. The site has approximately 190 feet of frontage on SW Bull Mountain Road. The owner is proposing a two-parcel partition as indicated on the proposed partition plat. Parcel #100,046 square feet) and Parcel #2 (12,427 square feet). A residential structure and detached garage exists on Parcel #2. SECTION IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS One comment was received from a property owner in regard to this application and is addressed under public facilities in this decision. SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Land Partitions (18.420): The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; The proposed partition will comply with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations at the time of proposed development as demonstrated both by the analysis presented within this administrative decision and by this application and review process through compliance with the conditions of approval. Therefore, this criterion is met. There are adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal; • Public facilities are discussed in detail later in this decision. Based on the analysis provided herein, staff finds that adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal. Therefore, this criterion is met. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards; and The public facilities and proposed improvements are discussed and conditioned later in this decision. Improvements will be reviewed as part of permit process and during construction at which time the appropriate review authority will insure that City and applicable agency standards are met. Based on the analysis in this decision, staff finds that this criterion is met, or will be met as conditioned. All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below: NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00008/LON DBE RGPARTITI ON PAGE 3 OF 11 • • • • The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. The minimum lot width required for the R-3.5 zoning district is 65 feet. The smaller of the two lots has a width of 67 feet. Therefore, this standard has been met. The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area. The minimum lot area requirement in the R-3.5 zoning district is 10,000 square feet. The proposed partition creates two lots that are 10,046 and 12,427 square feet respectively. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access easement. The proposed partition plat demonstrates that both lots will have frontage onto a public right-of-way. Par«�el #1 has 67 feet of frontage onto SW 100 Avenue and Parcel #2 has 123 feet of frontage on SW 100 Avenue. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. No development is proposed with this application. The existing dwelling on Parcel #2 will not be in violation of applicable setbacks. A detached garage on Parcel #2 is not affected by this partition. Therefore, this criterion has been met. When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. Neither lot will be considered as a flag lot.. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable. A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. No new paved drive in an accessway is associated with this application. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities. Fire district regulations will be reviewed at the time of development. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. No common drive is associated with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation. The access to the newly created parcel is deferred until the time of development. Therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00008/LONDBERGPARTITION • PAGE 4 OF 11 • • • Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred-year floodplain, the city shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for • greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance • with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. The partitioned lot is not adjacent to a one-hundred-year floodplain. Therefore, this standard does not apply. An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in accordance with Chapter 18.370, Variances and Adjustments. The applications for the partition and variance(s)/adjustment(s) will be processed concurrently. No variances or adjustments have been submitted with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Land Partition standards have been met. Residential Zoning Districts (18.510): - Development standards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2 below: TABLE 18.510.2 • DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES STANDARD R-3.5 Proposed Proposed Lot#1 Lot#2 Minimum Lot Size • -Detached unit 10,000 sq.ft. 10,046 sq.ft 12,427 sq.ft. -Duplexes -Attached unit[1] Average Minimum Lot Width -Detached unit lots 65 ft. 90 ft. 101 ft. • -Duplex lots 90 ft. -Attached unit lots Maximum Lot Coverage - - - Minimum Setbacks • -Front yard 20 ft. - 34 ft. -Side facing street on , • corner&through lots 20 ft. - - -Side yard 5ft - 5ft. -Rear yard 15 ft. - 15 ft. -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district -Distance between property line • and front of garage 20 ft. - - Maximum Height 30 ft. - >30 Minimum Landscape Requirement - • [1]Single-family attached residential units permitted at one dwelling per lot with no more that five attached units in one grouping. [2]Lot coverage indudes all buildings and impervious surfaces. * Multiple-family dwelling unit • ** Single-family dwelling unit Density Computations (18.715): The standards for Density computation deal with the intensity of residential land uses, usually stated as the number of housing units er acre. The applicant is proposing two lots. The minimum density for a lot of 22,651 square feet is (11) lot. The maximum density for this parcel is (2) lots. The applicant is proposing a (2) lot partition, which meets the density. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Density Computations standards have been satisfied. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00008/LONDBERGPARTITION PAGE 5 OF 11 . • ` Tree Removal (18.790): A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot,, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. The applicant has not proposed to remove any trees with this partition. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the tree removal standards have been met. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): This Chapter requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually.clear between three (3) and eight 8 feet in height (8) trees may be placed within this area provided that Vol branches below eight 8 feet are removed). A visual clearance area isi the triangular area frmed by measuring a -foot distance points with a straight line. No obstructions have been proposed where the existing access connects to SW 100th Avenue. No new access is proposed for the newly created lot. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the Vision Clearance Standards have been met. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a local residential street to have a 50 right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 100th Avenue, which is classified as a local residential street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 50 feet of ROW adjacent to this site, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. No further ROW dedications are necessary. SW 100th Avenue is currently paved, but not improved to the current City standard. The east side of the roadway is fully improved with curb, sidewalk, street trees and street lights. The pavement width is roughly 27 to 28 feet. However, the west seven feet of pavement appears to be either a pavement patch or a pavement widening that is not in good condition. The driving surface is rough and cracked and the edge is very irregular and broken. There is no established rock shoulder adjacent to the pavement. Staff was contacted by a neighbor in the area who testified that since cars park on the east side of the roadway, this particular section of roadway becomes very tricky for 2-way traffic. Southbound cars are often forced to the far west edge of the pavement where the ride is bumpy or they fall off the edge of the pavement and must drive along the dirt shoulder. Staff was able to detect signs that this does occur. It also helps explain how the edge of pavement is broken off in several places. NOTICE OF DECISION _ MLP2000-00008/LONDBERGPARTITION - - - PAGE-6 OF 11 • • • The neighbors, Sue and Bill Carver, also testified in a letter, dated August 29, 2000, that the applicant should be required to provide some level of roadway improvement along this frontage. Staff concurs. It would not be justified to require the applicant to provide a half-street improvement with curb, sidewalk and street trees. However, 18.810.030.A.1 and 2 provide that access must be secured along a public street and the public street must meet the standards of the development code. Since parking is presently being provided on the east side of the roadway, the absolute minimum pavement width should be 28 feet. Staff recommends the applicant be required to improve the west side of the roadway such that there is a minimum of 28 feet of good, quality pavement to the City's standard. This will likely require at least the removal and reconstruction of the west seven feet of poor pavement section. In addition, a three-foot rock shoulder shall be provided adjacent to the new pavement edge. With 28 feet of good pavement, the additional traffic from this development could be adequately accommodated. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. Neither lot is 1.5 .times the minimum lot size of the R-3.5 zoning district. The depth of both lots is not more than 2.5 times the average lot width. The average lot width for lot 1 is 90 feet with a depth of 125 feet. Lot 2 has an average lot width of 123 feet with an average lot depth of-100 feet. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. Lot 1 has 67 feet of frontage on SW 100th Avenue, and lot 2 has 123 feet of frontage on SW 100th. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. The impact of this partition does not warrant construction of a new sidewalk on the west side of the roadway at this time. PUBLIC FACILITIES Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line located in SW 100th Avenue that can serve this site. The existing house is presently served by this sewer line. The new house can be accommodated by extending a new service lateral from the main line. The applicant can do this work at the same time they are improving the street frontage. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00008/LONDBERGPARTITION PAGE 7 OF 11 • • Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). Any upstream surface water flows can be easily accommodated when the house on Parcel 1 is constructed. No public storm drainage lines are necessary. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanrio Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The addition of one buildable lot does not necessitate the construction of an onsite detention facility. The applicant will be able to direct the roof drains of the new house out to SW 100 Avenue where there is an existing roadside ditch. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeway is associated with this application. Therefore this standard does not apply. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. No bikeway is associated with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. No bikeway is associated with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00008/LONDBERGPARTITION PAGE 8 OF 11 • • • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along SW 100th Avenue. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50.,per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 190 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $5,225.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This areg is served from the City's public water system. There is an existing public water line located in SW 100 Avenue. The new water service for the new house can easily be provided. The applicant must coordinate with City prior to construction of the new house. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water qua ity facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The USA standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such as residential land partitions. It would be impractical to require an on-site water quality facility to accommodate treatment of the storm water from Parcel 1. Rather, the USA standards provide that applicants should pay a fee in-lieu of constructing a facility if deemed appropriate. Staff recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on this application. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to recording of the final plat. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. Survey Requirements The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00008/LONDBERGPARTITION PAGE 9 OF 11 • • • SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Operations.Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comment: Provide plans showing a fire hydrant within 500 feet of all portions of both lots. SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency provided the following comments which have been discussed under Public Facilities within this decision: SANITARY SEWER Each lot in the development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with Unified Sewerage agency's Design and Construction Standards. Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O. STORM SEWER Each lot in the development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by the R&O. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2000 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON SEPTEMBER 26, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Apeal_: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. -. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00008/LONDBERGPARTITION PAGE 10 OF 11 • • • Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. ( THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2000. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. Y� September . 2000 PREP•RED BY: 1 - -I cheide•ger DATE • sistant Plann: • ' _ September . 2000 - APPROVED BY: '[chard Bewersdor ' DATE Planning Manager I:\curpin\mathew\mlp\mIp2000-00008.dec.doc • • • NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00008/LONDBERGPARTITION PAGE 11 OF 11 • , • 4 pna Tq.11:1 N I Z I I 119 ` _ N I 1 = D H 27 t I I •5J E 1 . - 27„, z 1 I I (1,,15,------z--- -•- 1 2 5.-a-.- --*- - . - 127= 1 z2 5' Z I ry�0 I O• I Zit I y z cn CO 1�� / ry��o Cpl • 2.4 l ti CD • US / 1 6 I 1 C�• 13 Z , 4",' PROPOSED ti . lRTITION LINE AN I1 'ri Z I Z• .� Z I QN DECIDUOU i ti _ Om — CLUSTE• ?j� J I en EXISTING HOUSE Cli (TO REMAIN) Ce -• I y ♦♦Qnn■� = z I V`/ ■I ~ Z I 2 "' 271 I I I• 0 DGOUS I I. DECI D I 1 C 270 I I (L. z ✓-- ii- • ~?G2 iCn 1 I U I ti 2 H 269 Cp GsP.0 '.. 266 268 I a = i 1 y rn GARAGE 265 I 267 I N z 1 266-1-00------- 66-1-0 0 't A f.,„ 264 I 1 . _ _ 1 o 263 z \--/I _..\ /-262 STREET I G I I z • CITY OF TIGARD + MLP2000-00008 SITE PLAN N LONDBERG PARTITION (Map is not to scale) • ■I, ipu _ 111I CITY of TIGARD Ls =EN _.1 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM ,_ RI• K �L_ C VICINITY MAP • _T ■ • • K ST_ e ° e' MLP2000-00008_, E] o DELMO TE DR A'ILYN rT mm _ Ilrall..11: _ LONDBERG co �r� . 11i , a�W °' PARTITION • J �A'uEL C�T., DY MA cam. ` 4/4 musii SITE w = ■ E: ST, \ III II.;,, IIIBLEST - p \-� rL�lll�4 ! _ • L J ��- -11G11 17 sR �� I J �� �.����r __ ♦ 0 109 _ 200 300_ 400 " 500 Feel mr, N , ` .i 1"=378 feel J VW., �� DR ``\ N`EA f� ■ yF e City of Tigard R � Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified unto the Development Services Division.t"°D 13125 SW Hall Blvd 111 MrG Itfigfilikk& I Tigard,OR 97223 W4 — /www.39.ard. 1 �� - - -J� I http:/M ww.ci.ligard.or.us 1 • "`�`\\\ - - Community Development Plot date:Aug 15,2000;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR i NOC ,'. C ::OF TYE: EISION .': � � •MINOR LAND PARTITION :,. 0 08;:i: ,...t,.i ,.. =:(MLP) 20:00=000�0.8;:; ��•= .-.0 � �.,. {CITY OF TIGARD;:,:'s<s.' LO N D B E RG P :=':,,'"_•'• ;Coneinunity�De ielopment a . ARTITION sicaping 4Better. oininunity 120 DAYS = 12/12/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: LONDBERG PARTITION CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2000-00008 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting to partition one (1) existing lot of 22,651 square feet into two (2) lots of 10,046 and 12,427 square feet. APPLICANT: Ken Sandblast Land Solutions, Inc. PO Box 38 Tigard, OR 97015 OWNER: Roger Londberr and Kari Nass 15215 SW 100 Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 ZONING DESIGNATION: R-3.5; The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. LOCATION: 15215 SW 100th Avenue; WCTM 2S111CB, Tax Lot 01714. PROPOSED PARCEL 1: 10,046 Square Feet. PROPOSED PARCEL 2: 12,427 Square Feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390 (Decision-Making Procedures); 18.420 (Land Partitions); 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation); 18.715 (Density Computations); 18.790 (Tree Removal); 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the:City ot:Tigard.Community:Development,Di�e�ctoi's',; designee has APPROVED the � e above'='request: The findings�an `'•� g d�conclusions:on,� 'Which the decision is based are'noted in the full decision, available at`pity Hall:` THIS AL SHALL B APPROVAL '� ;�;_'= } .,<:#.>::.: a <,. •; .�:9 E sVALID - f;OR 8;MO,,.::.N T,:..H.;.S � . . FROM THE EFFECTIVE DAT All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: è • THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER I I, 2000 'AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON SEPTEMBER 26, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: . The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW . Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. I THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2000. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidecgger at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. ______r_i-r i.. �s 1 "l Z , l',/ 11 • ',a O [I,•Y 1 I 1,1 . 3• •• I'' j, PROPOSED I 1 ':RTITION LINE - h I` � .fir .- e. � i Z -ausrz: 1 `1> ,� 15 I a I I 0 EI(to 0(xou� ‘,, '4,,,, I I I V 111 32 1 'e.I H •1 0 .x«36«4 I I S F �,/L_ 'yam--369 irp:-,1 ]6E�� `4 � •- - // L' WAGE US 1--6, I 7 ' I --1,- g'/Orr N 264. , IBS p ` 363 -STREET LIG CITY OF TIGARD 1 MLP2000-00008 SITE PLAN^,` N LONDBERG PARTITION (Map I6 not to scale) • 1 .JTjT I _.I I I I I I I , \ I I, VICINITY MAP� �TI ~ I _— t . T __1 I-L-,-----,---- , 1 L_ MLP2000-00008. IBL •rri fit e � -= i _ J I I I 7_1- I I i _ i. _ y- 1- L YN CIT I . i�_—I -1 i � 1 I _ _.. I.___I LONDBERG i t r_.__I_---( ^ E _.-, _ V ! j PARTITION I i ' L s— 1111 I C--- — J T *-' f 'I_ - r-- 1 —_- _ i % '. _ t I N qJ I-__.. ._..-!_J i I ITE i . i i — --- — i SMILER ST - -' --- __._HOOD _\ 7 I Jr I __H--- , _ .- 11 _L_. I Y I ' ' I— !-!� I--_-1-J l I I...Ii!.. --- , H C i I • �J- 1 7-14-17- - LEST I r ` - : �iIIIt1i �- )T �; N� I --- — fly _1 -r I w =1 '-IT-" I �' 1 lam"OR ..._....L= _ �.m..: �° m d cnrrr:e„a L _ .. I I �' � �\ \\, \\\,,. :2 \ \�\ '� -- .___... .... w,....•3w'...•... NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHCOER,VENDOR OR SELLER: 411 THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION LAND PARTITION CITY OF TIGARD Community DeveMpment Shaping Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: August 15, 2000 FILE NUMBER: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2000-00008 FILE NAME: LONDBERG PARTITION PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting to partition one (1) existing lot of 22,651 square feet into two (2) lots of 10,046 and 12, 427 square feet. ZONE: Single-Family Residential (10,000 Square Feet); R-3.5. The purpose of the R-3.5 zoning district is to establish large urban residential home sites. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. LOCATION: 15215 SW 100th Avenue; WCTM 2S111CB, Tax Lot 1714. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 29. 2000. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheidecger. Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE • IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 12. 2000. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Planning Commission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. • • Failure of any party to addresehe relevant approval criteria witf ufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." ,, I' , I I I I I I f I --II Ift I CITY of TIGARD ■ E l rl I I 11117F-7 VICINITY MAP Q JJ i J i ,� P S hI°�I I . MLP2000-00008 i C DFI MD TE DR P+ j _ III•. YN_C�T r I Q _ : LONDTION — -- PART 1 • i I ■ eA'a T, LA Y I I I M` \ ___) I—_ ; II i i ■ I —' SITE r II i ■' ' !_ al i I I :• :ST . „ , -I 0� _ ' L� � �_ � ) ) : , .7:- i j—t- ii.41fit-ANO-Ciftaldi I h,-.._..._ ' .4 iy m mo wo .00 sao r.w ri,-----,__„r *011 xi i ii.” /-,4 City of Tigard `-3•___i S MMERsO R wa�� .� I I` E 1 AI I i . i M w,:sa sowo.n.wwo.oe...w m aan FSEUEST fo1Z U0444't€,VTS • • • MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: September 7, 2000 TO: Matt Scheidegger, Assistant Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: MLP 2000-00008, Londberg Partition Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a local residential street to have a 50 right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 100th Avenue, which is classified as a local residential street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 50 feet of ROW adjacent to this site, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. No further ROW dedications are necessary. SW 100th Avenue is currently paved, but not improved to the current City standard. The east side of the roadway is fully improved with curb, sidewalk, street trees and street lights. The pavement width is roughly 27 to 28 feet. However, the west seven feet of pavement appears to be either a pavement patch or a pavement widening that is not in good condition. The driving surface is rough and cracked and the edge is very irregular and broken. There is no ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2000-00008 Londberg Partition PAGE 1 • S established rock shoulder adjacent to the pavement. Staff was contacted by a neighbor in the area who testified that since cars park on the east side of the roadway, this particular section of roadway becomes very tricky for 2-way traffic. Southbound cars are often forced to the far west edge of the pavement where the ride is bumpy or they fall off the edge of the pavement and must drive along the dirt shoulder. Staff was able to detect signs that this does occur. It also helps explain how the edge of pavement is broken off in several places. The neighbors, Sue and Bill Carver, also testified in a letter, dated August 29, 2000, that the applicant should be required to provide some level of roadway improvement along this frontage. Staff concurs. It would not be justified to require the applicant to provide a half-street improvement with curb, sidewalk and street trees. However, 18.810.030.A.1 and 2 provide that access must be secured along a public street and the public street must meet the standards of the development code. Since parking is presently being provided on the east side of the roadway, the absolute minimum pavement width should be 28 feet. Staff recommends the applicant be required to improve the west side of the roadway such that there is a minimum of 28 feet of good, quality pavement to the City's standard. This will likely require at least the removal and reconstruction of the west seven feet of poor pavement section. In addition, a three-foot rock shoulder shall be provided adjacent to the new pavement edge. With 28 feet of good pavement, the additional traffic from this development could be adequately accommodated. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. (TO BE FILLED IN BY PLANNING) Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. (TO BE FILLED IN BY PLANNING) Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. The impact of this partition does not warrant construction of a new sidewalk on the west side of the roadway at this time. ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2000-00008 Londberg Partition PAGE 2 • S Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line located in SW 100th Avenue that can serve this site. The existing house is presently served by this sewer line. The new house can be accommodated by extending a new service lateral from the main line. The applicant can do this work at the same time they are improving the street frontage. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). Any upstream surface water flows can be easily accommodated when the house on Parcel 1 is constructed. No public storm drainage lines are necessary. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design'and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2000-00008 Londberg Partition PAGE 3 • S Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The addition of one buildable lot does not necessitate the construction of an onsite detention facility. The applicant will be able to direct the roof drains of the new house out to SW 100th Avenue where there.is an existing roadside ditch. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2000-00008 Londberg Partition PAGE 4 • • mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along SW 100th Avenue. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 190 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $ 5,225.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This area is served from the City's public water system. There is an existing public water line located in SW 100th Avenue. The new water service for the new house can easily be provided. The applicant must coordinate with City prior to construction of the new house. ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2000-00008 Londberg Partition PAGE 5 • • Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The USA standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such as residential land partitions. It would be impractical to require an on-site water quality facility to accommodate treatment of the storm water from Parcel 1. Rather, the USA standards provide that applicants should pay a fee in-lieu of constructing a facility if deemed appropriate. Staff recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on this application. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of$ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to recording of the final plat. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. Survey Requirements The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. Recommendations: ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2000-00008 Londberg Partition PAGE 6 • • THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: A Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the roadway work and sanitary sewer tap in SW 100th Avenue. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30.00. The applicant's public improvement construction plans shall indicate that they will make roadway improvements to SW 100th Avenue adjacent to their site to provide the following: a. removal and replacement of existing pavement section such that the resulting paved width of the roadway is 28 feet, b. establish a three-foot wide rock shoulder adjacent to the new edge of pavement, c. modify the existing roadside drainage ditch if necessary. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 100th Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 5,225.00 and it shall be paid prior to approval of the final plat. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2000-00008 Londberg Partition PAGE 7 • • of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. C. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive a letter from the City Engineering Department indicating: 1) that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor, and 2) that the applicant has either completed any public improvements associated with the project, or has at least obtained the necessary public improvement permit from the City to complete the work. D. Once the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer's signature. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: • The applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a mylar copy of the recorded final plat. Prior to issuance of the building permit for Parcel 1, the applicant shall pay the standard water quality fee per lot (fee amount will be the latest approved by USA). :\eng\brianr\comments rn Ip\mIp2000-00008.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2000-00008 Londberg Partition PAGE 8 • • CARVER August 29, 2000 REGS`v° TO: Brian Rager, Planner QvG Q0■ Matthew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner ` ,,- �� City of Tigard ����� FROM: Bill and Sue Carver 10155 S W Hoodview Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Re: File No. MLP 2000-00008 Londberg Partition COMMENTS: We submit the following comments and concerns regarding the above partition which abuts the east side of our property line. While we are concerned about the shape of the partition since it wraps around the current house on the property creating an odd "L" shaped lot, our major concern is the unimproved road (west half of 100th) that fronts both lots. In 1984 when the property on the eastside of 100t was developed, a one-half street improvement was made. When we inquired back in 1984 as to when the westside of 100t would be improved, we were advised that when the property abutting 100th was further developed the road would be completed. However, it has come to our attention that the current owner, Roger Londberg will not be required to do any road, curb or sidewalk improvements. While we understand Mr. Londberg not having to install curb or sidewalk since there are none on either side of his property, we do feel he is responsible for the road and that we as taxpayers should not be subsidizing this improvement on his behalf. If Mr. Londberg had been a long time resident or had planned on continuing to live on the property, then he would be a taxpayer helping to subsidize this improvement, but he is not. Mr. Londberg bought the property with the sole intent to improve the current house, divide the property, sell both the house and new lot and to move on. We, as permanent residents in this area, will still be left with an unimproved road that does not have sufficient paved width for cars to pass safely. We feel it is only fair that Mr. Londberg bear this expense from his profits and not shift this cost to the taxpayers of Tigard. Thank you for taking our concerns into consideration. ni& • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C. TIGARD Community Deve(opment SfiapingA Better Community DATE August 15,2000 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Gary Lampella,Building Official SEP 0 6 2000 FROM:. City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner fx 3171 Phone: (5031639-4111/Fax: (5031684-7291 MINOR LAND PARTITION IMLP)2000-00008 ➢ LONDBERG PARTITION The applicant is requesting to partition one (1) existing lot of 22,651 square feet into two (2) lots of 10,046 and 12, 427 square feet. LOCATION: 15215 SW 100th Avenue; WCTM 2S111CB, Tax Lot 1714. ZONE: Single-Family Residential (10,000 Square Feet); R-3.5. The purpose of the R-3.5 zoning district is to establish large urban residential home sites. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 29. 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: PrZAW t� t.taw3S S t-IDt.J',Ay), /4 Pt t?.� pei 2.YZ.4 Al T cm r3I+�1 6-0" D-( - 12€7-1.2,4% eg P Lo r5 P1 ase provi&tfiefolTowing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: &Ad- Phone Numberis]: ?/ .. • • F1 I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI I OF I A GARD Community DeveCopment Shaping Better Community DATE August 15,2000 D TO: Julia Huffman,USA/SWM Program , 0 ,,y7 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division AEG 1 S 2000 STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner[x 3111 ay Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2000-00008 > LONDBERG PARTITION Q The applicant is requesting to partition one (1) existing lot of 22,651 square feet into two (2) lots of 10,046 and 12, 427 square feet. LOCATION: 15215 SW 100th Avenue; WCTM 2S111CB, Tax Lot 1714. ZONE: Single-Family Residential (10,000 Square Feet); R-3.5. The purpose of the R-3.5 zoning district is to establish large urban residential home sites. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 29, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. — Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide Mel-arming information)Name of Persons]Commen V' �' 21 I-o Phone Number[sl: z)4 l6 – c • • RECEIVED PLANNING yorm AUG232000 clnoFrr UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON CO I 'TY MEMORANDUM DATE: August 21, 2000 • TO: Mathew Scheidegger, City of Tigard FROM: Julia Huffman, USA J✓t-• SUBJECT: Londberg Partition, MLP 2000-00008 SANITARY SEWER Each lot in the development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with Unified Sewerage Agency's Design and Construction Standards. Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O. STORM SEWER Each lot in the development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or-extend storm service as required by the R&O. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. 155 North First Avenue, Suite 270, MS 10 Phone: 503/648-8621 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124-3072 FAX:503/640-3525 • • „Ave: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C O'TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: August 15,2000 RECEIVED PLANNING ra,v4-A- lohn Roy,Property Manager/Operations Department AUG 1 7 2000 AMA 1.7) ; Cityof Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD /STAFF CONTACT Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner(x 3111 Phone: [503)639-4111/Fax: [503)664-1291 MINOR LAND PARTITION(MLPI 2000-00008 ➢ LONDBERG PARTITION < The applicant is requesting to partition one (1) existing lot of 22,651 square feet into two (2) lots of 10,046 and 12, 427 square feet. LOCATION: 15215 SW 100th Avenue; WCTM 2S111CB, Tax Lot 1714. ZONE: Single-Family Residential (10,000 Square Feet); R-3.5. The purpose of the R-3.5 zoning district is to establish large urban residential home sites. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 29, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information)Name of Persontsl Commenting: AA( / LA i, � Fo.n, JoW ' I Phone Number's]: k 39 5 RAAiAJ1/J& SECR€T4Ry /MATR I A LS • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CRY T'' OF I TIGARD • Community(Development S hoping A Better Community STATE OE OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, cpatricia G. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Be ow) ❑ NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: MLP2000-00008/LONDBERG PARTITION ❑ .AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director • ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: i ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director O Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: • ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director • ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer • ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OE (Type/Kind of Notice) FOR: t I (File NoJName Reference) (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A cop of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICES] of which is attached, marked hibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit'B',on Se Itember III r • dep•.ited in the United States Mail on Septemberll,2000, postage prepaid. al.44111W7 _ .111M1.1746 11"7'-'' that Prepar-, ice) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the /0 day of • COe./ , 2000. OFFICIAL SEAL 1 R B 10r R 0 � 14.T.: s. SHERMAN S.CASPER . l NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My Commission Expires: /3 • COMMISSION MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 133, ,2003 �/ • • EXHIBIT A • NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2000-00008 CITY OF TIGARD Community Development LONDBERG PARTITION Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 12/12/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: LONDBERG PARTITION CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2000-00008 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting to partition one (1) existing lot of 22,651 square feet into two (2) lots of 10,046 and 12,427 square feet. APPLICANT: Ken Sandblast Land Solutions, Inc. PO Box 38 Tigard, OR 97015 OWNER: Roger Londberg and Kari Nass 15215 SW 100 Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 ZONING DESIGNATION: R-3.5; The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. LOCATION: 15215 SW 100th Avenue; WCTM 25111 CB, Tax Lot 01714. PROPOSED PARCEL 1: 10,046 Square Feet. PROPOSED PARCEL 2: 12,427 Square Feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390 (Decision-Making Procedures); 18.420 (Land Partitions); 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation); 18.715 (Density Computations); 18.790 (Tree Removal); 18.795 (Visual Clearance); 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City`°of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has- APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. .. The findings and conclusionsuon which the decision`:is based are noted in;Section V: NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00008/LONDBERGPARTITION PAGE 1 OF 11 • • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PARTITION PLAT, 1 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 1. A Street Opening Perjnit will be required for this project to cover the roadway work and sanitary sewer tap in SW 100 Avenue. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 3. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30.00. 4. The applicant's public improvement construction plans shall indicate that they will make roadway improvements to SW 100 Avenue adjacent to their site to provide the following: A. removal and replacement of existing pavement section such that the resulting paved width of the roadway is 28 feet; B. establish a three-foot wide rock shoulder adjacent to the new edge of pavement; and C. modify the existing roadside drainage ditch if necessary. 5. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 100th Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $5,225.00 and it shall be paid prior to approval of the final plat. 6. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. 7. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. C. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive a letter from the City Engineering Department indicating: 1) that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor, and 2) that the applicant has either completed any public improvements associated with the project, or has at least obtained the necessary public improvement permit from the City to complete the work. D. Once the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer's signature. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00008/LONDBERGPARTITION PAGE 2 OF 11 • • THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED i PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 8. The applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a mylar copy of the recorded final plat. 9. Prior to issuance of the building permit for Parcel 1, the applicant shall pay the standard water quality fee per lot (fee amount will be the latest approved by USA). THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION NOTED UNDER THE PROCESS AND APPEAL SECTION OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Property History: The subject parcel is located within the City of Tigard. The property is designated Low-Density Residential on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map. No previous land use actions for this parcel appear in the City's land use records. Site Information and Proposal Descriptions The subject property is approximately 22,651 square feet. The site has approximately 190 feet of frontage on SW Bull Mountain Road. The owner is proposing a two-parcel partition as indicated on the proposed partition plat. Parcel #1 (10,046 square feet) and Parcel #2 (12,427 square feet). A residential structure and detached garage exists on Parcel #2. SECTION IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS One comment was received from a property owner in regard to this application and is addressed under public facilities in this decision. SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Land Partitions (18.420): The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; The proposed partition will comply with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations at the time of proposed development as demonstrated both by the analysis presented within this administrative decision and by this application and review process through compliance with the conditions of approval. Therefore, this criterion is met. There are adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal; Public facilities are discussed in detail later in this decision. Based on the analysis provided herein, staff finds that adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal. Therefore, this criterion is met. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards; and The public facilities and proposed improvements are discussed and conditioned later in this decision. Improvements will be reviewed as part of permit process and during construction at which time the appropriate review authority will insure that City and applicable agency standards are met. Based on the analysis in this decision, staff finds that this criterion is met, or will be met as conditioned. All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below: NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00008/LONDBERGPARTITION PAGE 3 OF 11 • • The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. The minimum lot width required for the R-3.5 zoning district is 65 feet. The smaller of the two lots has a width of 67 feet. Therefore, this standard has been met. The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area. The minimum lot area requirement in the R-3.5 zoning district is 10,000 square feet. The proposed partition creates two lots that are 10,046 and 12,427 square feet respectively. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access easement. The proposed partition plat demonstrates that both lots will have frontage onto a public right-of-way. Parcel #1 has 67 feet of frontage onto SW 100 Avenue and Parcel #2 has 123 feet of frontage on SW 100 Avenue. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. No development is proposed with this application. The existing dwelling on Parcel #2 will not be in violation of applicable setbacks. A detached garage on Parcel #2 is not affected by this partition. Therefore, this criterion has been met. When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. Neither lot will be considered as a flag lot. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable. A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. No new paved drive in an accessway is associated with this application. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities. Fire district regulations will be reviewed at the time of development. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. No common drive is associated with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation. The access to the newly created parcel is deferred until the time of development. Therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00008/LONDBERGPARTITION PAGE 4 OF 11 • • Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred-year floodplain, the city shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. The partitioned lot is not adjacent to a one-hundred-year floodplain. Therefore, this standard does not apply. An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in accordance with Chapter 18.370, Variances and Adjustments. The applications for the partition and variance(s)/adjustment(s) will be processed concurrently. No variances or adjustments have been submitted with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Land Partition standards have been met. Residential Zoning Districts (18.510): Development standards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2 below: TABLE 18.510.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES STANDARD R-3.5 Proposed Proposed Lot#1 Lot#2 Minimum Lot Size -Detached unit 10,000 sq.ft. 10,046 sq.ft. 12,427 sq.ft. -Duplexes -Attached unit[1] Average Minimum Lot Width -Detached unit lots 65 ft. 90 ft. 101 ft. -Duplex lots 90 ft. -Attached unit lots Maximum Lot Coverage - - - Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 20 ft. - 34 ft. -Side facing street on • corner&through lots 20 ft. - - -Side yard 5ft. - 5ft. -Rear yard 15 ft. - 15 ft. -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district -Distance between property line and front of garage 20 ft. - - Maximum Height 30 ft. - >30 Minimum Landscape Requirement - [1]Single-family attached residential units permitted at one dwelling per lot with no more that five attached units in one grouping. [2]Lot coverage includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. Multiple-family dwelling unit Single-family dwelling unit Density Computations (18.715): The standards for Density computation deal with the intensity of residential land uses, usually stated as the number of housing units per acre: The applicant is proposing two lots. The minimum density for a lot of 22,651 square feet is (1) lot. The maximum density for this parcel is (2) lots. The applicant is proposing a (2) lot partition, which meets the density. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Density Computations standards have been satisfied. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00006/LONDBERGPARTITION PAGE 5 OF 11 • • Tree Removal (18.790): A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot„ parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. The applicant has not proposed to remove any trees with this partition. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the tree removal standards have been met. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): This Chapter requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually.clear between three (3) and eight 8 feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight 8 feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a -foot distance points with a straight line. No obstructions have been proposed where the existing access connects to SW 100th Avenue. No new access is proposed for the newly created lot. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the Vision Clearance Standards have been met. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a local residential street to have a 50 right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 100th Avenue, which is classified as a local residential street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 50 feet of ROW adjacent to this site, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. No further ROW dedications are necessary. SW 100th Avenue is currently paved, but not improved to the current City standard. The east side of the roadway is fully improved with curb, sidewalk, street trees and street lights. The pavement width is roughly 27 to 28 feet. However, the west seven feet of pavement appears to be either a pavement patch or a pavement widening that is not in good condition. The driving surface is rough and cracked and the edge is very irregular and broken. There is no established rock shoulder adjacent to the pavement. Staff was contacted by a neighbor in the area who testified that since cars park on the east side of the roadway, this particular section of roadway becomes very tricky for 2-way traffic. Southbound cars are often forced to the far west edge of the pavement where the ride is bumpy or they fall off the edge of the pavement and must drive along the dirt shoulder. Staff was able to detect signs that this does occur. It also helps explain how the edge of pavement is broken off in several places. - NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00008/LONDBERGPARTITION PAGE 6 OF 11 • • The neighbors, Sue and Bill Carver, also testified in a letter, dated August 29, 2000, that the applicant should be required to provide some level of roadway improvement along this frontage. Staff concurs. It would not be justified to require the applicant to provide a half-street improvement with curb, sidewalk and street trees. However, 18.810.030.A.1 and 2 provide that access must be secured along a public street and the public street must meet the standards of the development code. Since parking is presently being provided on the east side of the roadway, the absolute minimum pavement width should be 28 feet. Staff recommends the applicant be required to improve the west side of the roadway such that there is a minimum of 28 feet of good, quality pavement to the City's standard. This will likely require at least the removal and reconstruction of the west seven feet of poor pavement section. In addition, a three-foot rock shoulder shall be provided adjacent to the new pavement edge. With 28 feet of good pavement, the additional traffic from this development could be adequately accommodated. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is lss than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. Neither lot is 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the R-3.5 zoning district. The depth of both lots is not more than 2.5 times the average lot width. The average lot width for lot 1 is 90 feet with a depth of 125 feet. Lot 2 has an average lot width of 123 feet with an average lot depth of 100 feet. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. Lot 1 has 67 feet of frontage on SW 100th Avenue, and lot 2 has 123 feet of frontage on SW 100th. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. The impact of this partition does not warrant construction of a new sidewalk on the west side of the roadway at this time. PUBLIC FACILITIES Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line located in SW 100th Avenue that can serve this site. The existing house is presently served by this sewer line. The new house can be accommodated by extending a new service lateral from the main line. The applicant can do this work at the same time they are improving the street frontage. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00008/LONDBERGPARTITION PAGE 7 OF 11 • • Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). Any upstream surface water flows can be easily accommodated when the house on Parcel 1 is constructed. No public storm drainage lines are necessary. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The addition of one buildable lot does not necessitate the construction of an onaite detention facility. The applicant will be able to direct the roof drains of the new house out to SW 100 Avenue where there is an existing roadside ditch. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeway is associated with this application. Therefore this standard does not apply. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. No bikeway Is associated with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. No bikeway is associated with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00008/LONDBERGPARTITION PAGE 8 OF 11 • • . All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and . Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along SW 100th Avenue. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50,per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 190 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $5,225.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This area is served from the City's public water system. There is an existing public water line located in SW 100 Avenue. The new water service for the new house can easily be provided. The applicant must coordinate with City prior to construction of the new house. Storm Water Quality: . The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water qua ity facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The USA standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such as residential land partitions. It would be impractical to require an on-site water quality facility to accommodate treatment of the storm water from Parcel 1. Rather, the USA standards provide that applicants should pay a fee in-lieu of constructing a facility if deemed appropriate. Staff recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on this application. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to recording of the final plat. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. Survey Requirements The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00008/LONDBERGPARTITION PAGE 9 OF 11 • • SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Operations Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comment: Provide plans showing a fire hydrant within 500 feet of all portions of both lots. SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency provided the following comments which have been discussed under Public Facilities within this decision: SANITARY SEWER Each lot in the development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with Unified Sewerage agency's Design and Construction Standards. Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O. STORM SEWER Each lot in the development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by the R&O. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies • Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2000 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON SEPTEMBER 26, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. eal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the.required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00008/LONDBERGPARTITION PAGE 10 OF 11 • • Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. ITHE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2000. I Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. j ,/ J / 11 / ,.:, / -L ' /i_ ----- September J . 2000 PREP A RED BY: Or - - -' cheide!ger DATE sistant Plann; 0 - / (4, ' / September . 2000 APPROVED BY: ''chard Bewersdor , DAT Planning Manager I:\curpin\mathew\mlp\ml p2000-00008.dec.doc NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00008/LONDBERGPARTITION PAGE 11 OF 11 A CM OF mum, N A Z 1 I 2i0 I - N ` ' E a N 21 BI I .. a 1IP CI iii PROPOSED N Z RTITION LINE 1 .AN h Z 1 Z I C N Q. • ry1A 15 / CLUISTE-U, ii ? z .■ 7 i I 0 EXISTING HOUSE i CO Cp r-i-1 (TO REMAIN) , �1� �' 4' Q Ce 41- ECIDGOUS I N 12 �� ry a i 11 1 232 1 . H 37 LIL ' 24- , 271 I I 1 O 1 DECIOGOUS I b i a I a Z 270 N ( �6,1 L I ) 1 N 1 269 R 266 I y s co) .� - GARAGE 265 • / ‘..._.—.------------267 I N / I , a a 264 26670-a-------- ��" I I ( : n 263 a z z N � z62 STREET LIG I a I D I z CITYOF '''GAR M LP2000-00008 •SITE PLAN N LONDBERG PARTITION (Map is not to scale) .ii I„' -■ UI CITY of TIGARD ' GEOGRAPNIC INFORMATION SYSTEM � RsoCK �T Ilk\■w ■ VICINITY MAP mi • ■■ III _ ■¢■ ■ KS ie r 8— ■� MLP2000-00008 8 i o ' IlL, 111111 DE MONIED' X� IF ■ A.�YN T LO N D B E RG I. III 111 a '■ aaI PARTITION 1111111 1111=1111 III . ifin .DY j5iIusiE z ■ .ollatmon MI la ■■�■■■ ■111 ' ST.0. ii.,„ .1 sow .1 Llimplin i■ Is-u ill o ..BLEST ; idol LIII. i11t ■ It �►libing..■ 1.■■..■■■■.---...■ olow mai ■■ 1 En U. IVàa.■■ ■■ ■■I ■ ♦ , "• LAN 1 Ii!.1111 ■ 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet mil 1°=37e reef iI1tRI ____• .+ / City of Tigard ,� Q Inforation on this map Is for general location ony and QR should be verified with the Development Services Division. F�E�D . 13125 SW Hall Blvd ,``` N1ER L*1111191, . Tigard,OR 97223 .I1 . SVM ```� ``` � ', ` http://www.ci.ligard.or.us �`�� Plot date:Aug 15,2000;C:\magicWIAGIC03.APR Community Development • • EXHIBIT B Ken Sandblast Land Solutions, Inc. MLP2000-00008 PO Box 38 LONDBERG PARTITION Clackamas OR 97015 Roger Londberq and Kari Nass 15215 SW 100t Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Bill and Sue Carver 10155 SW Hoodview Drive Tigard, OR 97224 • • EXHIBIT. A • NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION. A 1 MINOR LAND PARTITION •(MLP) 2000-000081 --1-4°'!!' (((( ,CITY OF TIGARD) g „•_.Community'Deveropment=< . • LONDBERG PARTITION ° : Shaping ABetter Community 120 DAYS = 12/12/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: LONDBERG PARTITION CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2000-00008 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting to partition one (1) existing lot of 22,651 square feet into two (2) lots of 10,046 and 12,427 square feet. APPLICANT: Ken Sandblast • Land Solutions, Inc. PO Box 38 Tigard, OR 97015 OWNER: Roger Londberr and Kari Nass 15215 SW 100 Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 ZONING DESIGNATION: R-3.5; The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. LOCATION: 15215 SW 100th Avenue; WCTM 25111 CB, Tax Lot 01714. PROPOSED PARCEL 1: 10,046 Square Feet. PROPOSED PARCEL 2: 12,427 Square Feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390 (Decision-Making Procedures); 18.420 (Land Partitions); 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access Egress.and Circulation);=:.18;715 (Density Computations); 18.790 (Tree Removal); 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). • SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development'Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE;DATE OFD THIS,DECISION:'aw :: : :`E ; ' Y'R All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (250 per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: 0 • • THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER I I, 2000 AND BECOMES • . EFFECTIVE ON SEPTEMBER 26, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. L__ THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2000. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. I r 125 •-- -•-- 1 a,! 1 Z 5 Y/ I I �_ � � I 0 I'' C7 PROPOSED ? :RTITION LINE 4 1► 1 Z I h -ausa: 1 I I?> d j ,p• 15 `—i •cosmic taus[ I 1 CI re N �4 .*" I a I I V I ' Q ? ,1 cG000u5 1✓�32 1 I F- � I I u' ^^ 1 jI I 0 SF 'c3.11 itts<1--, - 5 ].9 1 _y6. 1 > I ,_-m,/ 1 I t' .�) ..:_ -- -- -- -�- -- - to I�_26i STREET LIT I CITY OF TIGARD I N SITE PLAN LONDBERG PARTITION (Map Is not to uak) I I I I ,■ . • F ea. .1111 LL I �— IP • SL VICINITY MAP iaff � —� ICI I MLP2000-00008. DELMONTEDR ,� __ G .y, I,1 CT mi II 15---1 1167( `_� LONDBERG ._ 1 — \ PARTITION LDYlM 'A', L T6 � 1 '° - CI • �•• ISITE J aii ■ _ SATTLER 5T— v� \ C� & ■ �-- , I I a n LE�IIII I EMI IIL_* I I I I 1 I 1 Ho A. ' I �I� 1 � I V - J l —;—I L J -- 1 . N _ lbw` -` ,`����"Y �_ :FIELD I '/�IIIl '\\\�10_ - __ - .__ •..a�/,4, _ Ciry ofTgard • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CRY OF TI F I GARD Community cDevelopment Shaping Better Community STATE OE OREGON- ) County of l4las(ington )ss. City of igard ) I, cPatricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (ate ApProP to Boa(s)aebw) ❑ NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) • ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: MLP2000-00008/LONDBERG PARTITION ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) . City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: / ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission • ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:i ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission • ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF: (Type/Kind of Notice) FOR: I • (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICES) of which is attached, ma -: Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Ex ibit' :",on Se 1 embe 1,_j 00 d de..sited in the United States Mail on Septemberll,2000, postage prepaid. AiraP i . . MI I / ;_�fj %� (Per • t a -repares otice) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed sefore me on the /0 day of r3c-/--- , 2000. OFFICIAL SEAL .1 I � SHERMAN S.CASPER vi.?" NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My Commission Expires: /I4cwyl3 ?0v3 MY COMMICOMMISSION I I M NO.Y 13,2003 (./ • (r' 5 ) EXHIBIT B 2S111 CA-07400 25111 CB-01712 ANDERSON DAVID L&JILL B CARVER WILLIAM A SUSAN M 15240 SW 100TH AVE 10155 SW HOODVIEW DRIVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S111CB-01718 2S111CB-01706 ANDERSON ROGER F AND CIROTSKI LAWRENCE L AND LAURA L ESTHER LEE 10305 SW HOODVIEW DR 10120 SW KABLE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111CC-14300 2S111CA-15000 BAILEY CHARLES A&BETTY J COMEGYS DONALD L IDA J BY DORSZYNSKI ROBERT L CONSERVATOR 15060 SW 100TH PO BOX 3050 TIGARD,OR 97223 SALEM,OR 97302 2S 111 CA-07300. S 111 CA-15200 BENHAM SUSAN JEANETTE Co GYS P! ALD L IDA J 15210 SW 100TH 15061 : .0TH TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD,OR 9 23 25111 CB-01720 25111 CA-07700 BILLINGS BYRON&BARBARA S TRS COOPER ARTIS W 10210 SW KABLE 5013 MILLSTONE WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 GRANITE BAY,CA 95746 2S 111 CB-05100 2S 111 CA-01000 BLAIS GREGORY M&BETTY A CORP OF PRESIDING BISHOP OF 15165 SW 100TH _ CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST LDS TIGARD,OR 97224 50 E NORTH TEMPLE#511-4705 SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84150 25111 CA-09900 2S111 CB-01710 BLUM JOHN E&BARBARA J CORTRIGHT ROBERT S 9889 SW KABLE ST KATHERINE A TIGARD,OR 97223 10200 SW HOODVIEW DRIVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CC-15900 111 CB-01709 BONGARD ERCYL D CO" 'IGHT 'e BERT S& 10005 SW HIGHLAND DR KATHER A TIGARD,OR 97224 1021% W HO ` IEW DRIVE GARD,OR 97223 2S 111 CA-08000 2S 111 CA-09200 CARRIGG STEPHEN&SUSAN Y COSTANZO EILEEN M TR 9955 SW KABLE ST 15370 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CC-15800 2S 111 CB-03100 CARSTENSEN MARGARET E CUTZ MARGARET RUTH 10015 SW HIGHLAND DR 10111 SW LADY MARION DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 • • 25111 CB-05200 2S 111 CB-01713 DAILER DAVID M& FAST JEFF A AND KATHY D NYQUIST JEANNE E 10185 SW HOODVIEW DRIVE 10042 SW LADY MARION DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CA-15100 2S 111 BD-04000 DAVISON STEPHEN ANN FREDRICKS MARY J/BARON EDAH H 15040 SW 100TH do REED DENNIS AND SUSAN TIGARD,OR 97224 15020 SW 100TH TIGARD,OR 97223 25111 CB-02800 25111 CB-03000 DELANY DOUGLAS G&JANICE L FREEMAN ROBERT M AND JENNIFER F 10023 SW LADY MARION DR 10067 SW LADY MARION DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111CC-15100 2S111CB-01717 DERINGTON LEMAN E&LILLIAN K T FRIEDRICH JOHN H AND 10105 SW HIGHLAND DR JANET M TIGARD,OR 97224 10080 SW KABLE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CB-01716 2S 111 CB-01703 DOHERTY KENNETH E&SANDRA L GIESBRECHT R E 10040 SW KABLE ST H DEANNE TIGARD,OR 97224 10235 SW HOODVIEW DR TIGARD,OR 97223 25111 CA-08100 2S111 CB-01719 DOYLE MICHAEL P&CENDY L GIRAUD GEORGE&PATRICIA L 9945 SW KABLE ST 10170 SW KABLE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 CC-15400 2S 111 CC-15300 EISEN HYMAN GOTTLIEB EDWARD F 10055 SW HIGHLAND DRIVE 10065 SW HIGHLAND DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111CA-00800 2S111CC-15500 EVEN MARC ROBERT/MICHELLE ANNE GUDEKUNST PETER T& WIEBE MACK/MEREDITH S DOROTHEA A TRUSTEES 9900 SW SETTLER ST 10045 SW HIGHLAND DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 25111 CA-14600 2S 111 CA-07600 FABER ROBERT C&MARGARET H GUEVARA RAMON V 14230 SW 103RD 15260 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 11 CA-15300 2S 111 CB-02601 FABE' '•BE' &MARGARET H HALE RONALD A&BETH REVOCABLE 14230 0 'S LIVING TRUST ARD,OR 9722• 14925 SW 100TH TIGARD,OR 97224 • • • 2S1 11 CA-10000 2S1 11 CA-08600 HANCOCK ROBERT B&KAREN M KREBS TERESA E 9867 SW KABLE ST 9940 SW KABLE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CB-01715 2S 111 CB-01708 HANSEL JOHN C/IONA L KUEHNER RICHARD A 15285 SW 100TH AVE BARBARA N TIGARD,OR 97224 10260 SW HOODVIEW DR TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1 11 CA-08900 2S1 11 CA-10600 HOUGHTON CYNTHIA LU LAWTON JEFFREY&SUZANNE C 9970 SW KABLE 15237 SW 98TH TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111CA-08500 2S111CA-09800 IRWIN DANIEL R AND LEHMAN CARL W AND BETTY SUE ELIZABETH E 9890 SW KABLE ST 9930 SW KABLE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S111CC-14700 2S111CA-15400 JOHNSON ALAN E AND LAURA R LILE KATHY S 10145 SW HIGHLAND DR 9890 SW PEPPERTREE LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 25111 CB-05000 25111 CA-08800 JOHNSON MARJORIE E LIN HUAN& 10250 SW LADY MARION DR LAI LIANG I TIGARD,OR 97224 9960 SW KABLE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CA-07500 2S 111 CB-01714 JOHNSON TODD W&DEBORAH J LONDBERG ROGER& 25420 SW MEADOWBROOK LN NASS KARI SHERWOOD,OR 97140 15215 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CA-14700 2S 111 CB-01732 JONES MALCOLM Y AND LUCAS MAURICE D AND PAMELA R JANICE KAY 10255 SW KABLE ST 9885 SW SATTLER TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 25111 CB-01600 25111 CA-14900 KALLSTROM EVELYN LOUISE MCCOBB JAMES E&MARILYN M J E 9975 SW SATTLER ST 15025 SW 100TH PORTLAND,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BD-01513 2S 111 CB-03200 KNEZ JOHN S JR&VICKI L MCGREGOR MARK D&LYNDIA J 14980 SW 100TH AVE 10135 SW LADY MARION DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 2S111CB-01734 2S111CA-08400 MCKEE TERRY D PRISCILLA PAULSON BRUCE L&VERNA MCLAIN 10195 SW KABLE ST 9920 SW KABLE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 11 CA-00700 2S1 11 CB-02900 MITTELSTEDT DANIEL&WINONA V B PRATT KERRY L&JULIE M 9880 SW SATTLER ST 10049 SW LADY MARION DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 111 CA-00500 25111 CB-01705 MI - - TE l IANIEL&WINONA V B REED MARK LEROY& 9880 -• S• ' R ST SHAW LILLIE GARD,OR 97224 10275 SW HOODVIEW DR TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111CA-00600 2S111CA-15500 MITT D %•NIEL&WINONA V B REED SUSAN J 9880 • A : ST 9876 SW PEPPERTREE LN T ARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111CC-15200 2S111CA-14800 MUDROW MURIEL TRUSTEE REEKIE IAN A 10075 SW HIGHLAND DR 9955 SW SATTLER ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CC-14900 2S 111 CA-08200 MURPHY HELEN C TRUSTEE RHODES TODD E&LISA M 10125 SW HIGHLAND DR 9935 SW KABLE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 CB-02500 2S 111 CA-09100 NESS DYANN E& SANDERS WARREN L&EVA M J STEVE 15360 SW 100TH ST 14977 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 25111 CB-05300 25111 CC-15600 NOSIER BRADLEY M&CASSANDRA A SCHMOKEL MELVIN H&B CAROL TRS 10060 SW LADY MARION DR 10035 SW HIGHLAND DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CA-00400 2S 111 CB-01601 OTTOMAN PATRICIA A TRUSTEE SLAUGHTER JOHN A BEATRICE 21635 SW ELWERT RD 15055 SW 100TH AVE SHERWOOD,OR 97140 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CB-01711 2S 111 CA-07200 OWEN MARY PAT SOMMERS GREG J& 10125 SW HOODVIEW SOMMERS PAUL TIGARD,OR 97224. 9960 SW SATTLER ST TIGARD,OR 97224 . . • 2S 111 CA-08300 2S 111 CA-07900 SORENSEN ANNE E TRUSTEE WARD ROBERT J CIO US NATIONAL BANK OF OREGON 15280 SW 100TH AVE BY COLLEEN SPIDAL TIGARD,OR 97224 PO BOX 3168 PORTLAND,OR 97208 2S111 CA-07800 2S111 CB-03300 ST GERMAIN JOHN M&LINDA A WARDIN G FERD&MARION EVA& 15290 SW 100TH AVE WARDIN JOHN G&NANCY A TIGARD,OR 97224 21510 SW JOHNSON RD WEST LINN,OR 97068 2S 111 CA-14500 2S 111 CB-03400 STARKEY WILLIAM L&BONNIE K WA': G FERD : ARION EVA& 9825 SW SATTLER ST WARDIN 1 G&NANCY A TIGARD,OR 97223 21511 :1 JOHN :• -D ST LINN,OR 97068 2S111CA-10800 2S111CC-15700 STEPUTIS KIRK R&DONNA M WILLIAMS MILDRED L TRUSTEE 15213 SW 98TH AVE 10025 SW HIGHLAND DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CA-08700 2S 111 CC-15000 STEVENS SHERYL LU WYNKOOP VICTOR R&VIVIAN A 9950 SW KABLE ST 10115 SW HIGHLAND DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CA-09700 2S 111 CA-10700 STEVENSON ROBERT L&DEBORAH C YACKLEY HAROLD G&JOAN I 13100 SW TOOZE RD 15225 SW 98TH AVE SHERWOOD,OR 97140 TIGARD,OR 97223 25111 CA-09000 SWAN STAN C AND CHRISTINE J 9990 SW KABLE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 11 CB-01707 TAENNLER ALFRED 10290 SW HOODVIEW DR TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111 CC-14800 TUCKER LILLIAN M 10135 SW HIGHLAND DR TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CA-09300 VERDON KEVIN W& WASHABAUGH MONA G 15380 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 • • Sally Christensen Bill Finck 15685 SW 166 Avenue 9235 SW Mountain View Lane Tigard, OR 91224 Tigard, OR 91224 Mary Ann Melvin Kristen Miller 10395 SW Bonanza Way 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 91224 Tigard, OR 91223 Stephen Bicker CITY OF TIGARD 14235 SW 97th Avenue SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 91224 Mark Bogert 14445 SW 100th Avenue is\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc UPDATED: 9-Jun-00 Tigard, OR 91224 Twyla Brady 9360 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 91223 Debra Muir 15065 SW 19th Avenue Tigard, OR 91224 • Sue Siebold 15314 SW Thurston Lane Tigard, OR 91224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 91281 Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive,Apt. #3 Tigard, OR 91224-3316 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 91224 • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OF F TIGARD Community cDeve(opment Shaping Better Community STATE OE OREGON- ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, 'Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Blow) © NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: MLP2000-00008/LONDBERG PARTITION ❑ AMENDED NOTICE - (File No/Name Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: • ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director • ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF: (Type/Nind of Notice) FOR: 0=7 (File No/Name Reference) - (Date of Public Heanng,if applicable) • A co. the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEIS) of,which is attached, ma ked hlblt "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on•the attached list(s), marked Exhibit": ,on All I uSt 15 200). . . deposited i the United States Mail on August 15,2000, postage prepaid. (Person at Prepare• otice Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the /0 day of OCT, , 2000. • LIP ' '> OFFICIAL SEAL _ / / " SHERMAN S. GASPER ' I 1 I ( ' I ' r NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON • \ COMMISSION NO.323409 My Commission Expires:_ J /3 2cr,3 MY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 13,2003 • NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHO•R,VENDOR OR SELLER: • EXHIBIT A THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION ip MINOR LAND.PARTITION ARD CITY OFTIG Community�DeARDent Shaping Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: August 15, 2000 FILE NUMBER: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2000-00008 FILE NAME: LONDBERG PARTITION PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting to partition one (1) existing lot of 22,651 square feet into two (2) lots of 10,046 and 12, 427 square feet. ZONE: Single-Family Residential (10,000 Square Feet); R-3.5. The purpose of the R-3.5 zoning district is to establish large urban residential home sites. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. LOCATION: 15215 SW 100th Avenue; WCTM 2S111CB, Tax Lot 1714. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 29. 2000. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheidegger. Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 12. 2000. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Planning Commission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address& relevant approval criteria with eficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE . DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed deyelopment area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. . ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries . include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this NoticePi ulnnder the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." �I I I I I I I I l I I I I I II / CITY T.GARD I ■_ _MIJR7OC�C . _ / VICINITY MAP 'a.- l — ■� �K s7 ° W II MLP2000-00008 :�� B o L, _DM MONTF DR „%.? d o w SJ LONDBERG m it i Q PARTITION iI!I W MP IADY hi,:‘,) m SITE Q.111 = Nisi - H000ws - ' . . 'Soil!I • II to��: • T CA> HEW ViI r° 410 ~ r r rya J..��1i I.\N___ — I t= ______� ■ _ . ♦ •IIIM 4H I I 1,•11.,,, 444 N ■ _ I If n � . Jr-aeae — 111‘ .OSk-t) NM" Ill iik �--- DR co 11■1111. co 1■111•11` a IliNS l sUMMERF`g��OR `. ` , ,IP .imwmm�a.m w.m...aw...n mi x.nv s.u so w a...aw w e.m-a.w ti m w sn«wen....mp..wb o III •4 rgw.oa om (DCl Ic1- 5 ) • • 2S111CA-07400 2S111CB-01712 EXHIBIT B ANDERSON DAVID L&JILL B CARVER WILLIAM A SUSAN M 15240 SW 100TH AVE 10155 SW HOODVIEW DRIVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 25111 CB-01718 25111 CB-01706 ANDERSON ROGER F AND CIROTSKI LAWRENCE L AND LAURA L ESTHER LEE 10305 SW HOODVIEW DR 10120 SW KABLE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111CC-14300 2S111CA-15000 BAILEY CHARLES A&BETTY J COMEGYS DONALD L IDA J BY DORSZYNSKI ROBERT L CONSERVATOR 15060 SW 100TH PO BOX 3050 TIGARD,OR 97223 SALEM,OR 97302 2S 111 CA-07300 S 111 CA-15200 BENHAM SUSAN JEANETTE Cs GYS ' ALD L IDA J 15210 SW 100TH 1506s : .OTH TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD,OR 9 23 25111 CB-01720 25111 CA-07700 BILLINGS BYRON&BARBARA S TRS COOPER ARTIS W 10210 SW KABLE 5013 MILLSTONE WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 GRANITE BAY,CA 95746 25111 CB-05100 25111 CA-01000 BLAIS GREGORY M&BETTY A CORP OF PRESIDING BISHOP OF 15165 SW 100TH CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST LDS TIGARD,OR 97224 50 E NORTH TEMPLE#511-4705 SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84150 25111 CA-09900 25111 CB-01710 BLUM JOHN E&BARBARA J CORTRIGHT ROBERT S 9889 SW KABLE ST KATHERINE A TIGARD,OR 97223 10200 SW HOODVIEW DRIVE TIGARD,OR 97224 25111 CC-15900 111 CB-01709 BONGARD ERCYL D CO" 'IGHT 'e BERT S& 10005 SW HIGHLAND DR KATHER ' A TIGARD,OR 97224 102.: W HOG! IEW DRIVE GARD,OR 97223 2S111CA-08000 2S111CA-09200 CARRIGG STEPHEN&SUSAN Y COSTANZO EILEEN M TR 9955 SW KABLE ST 15370 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CC-15800 25111 CB-03100 CARSTENSEN MARGARET E CUTZ MARGARET RUTH 10015 SW HIGHLAND DR 10111 SW LADY MARION DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 • • • 2S 111 CB-05200 2S 111 CB-01713 DAILER DAVID M& FAST JEFF A AND KATHY D NYQUIST JEANNE E 10185 SW HOODVIEW DRIVE 10042 SW LADY MARION DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CA-15100 2S 111 BD-04000 DAVISON STEPHEN ANN FREDRICKS MARY J/BARON EDAH H 15040 SW 100TH do REED DENNIS AND SUSAN TIGARD,OR 97224 15020 SW 100TH TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S 111 CB-02800 2S 111 CB-03000 DELANY DOUGLAS G&JANICE L FREEMAN ROBERT M.AND JENNIFER_F. 10023 SW LADY MARION DR 10067 SW LADY MARION DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111CC-15100 2S111CB-01717 DERINGTON LEMAN E&LILLIAN K T FRIEDRICH JOHN H AND 10105 SW HIGHLAND DR JANET M TIGARD,OR 97224 10080 SW KABLE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CB-01716 2S 111 CB-01703 DOHERTY KENNETH E&SANDRA L GIESBRECHT R E 10040 SW KABLE ST H DEANNE TIGARD,OR 97224 10235 SW HOODVIEW DR TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 CA-08100 2S 111 CB-01719 DOYLE MICHAEL P&CENDY L GIRAUD GEORGE&PATRICIA L 9945 SW KABLE ST 10170 SW KABLE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S111CC-15400 2S111CC-15300 EISEN HYMAN GOTTLIEB EDWARD F 10055 SW HIGHLAND DRIVE 10065 SW HIGHLAND DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111CA-00800 2S111CC-15500 - • - EVEN MARC ROBERT/MICHELLE ANNE GUDEKUNST PETER T& WIEBE MACK/MEREDITH S DOROTHEA A TRUSTEES 9900 SW SETTLER ST 10045 SW HIGHLAND DR • •. - TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 • ' • 2S1 11 CA-14600 2S1 11 CA-07600 FABER ROBERT C&MARGARET H GUEVARA RAMON V 14230 SW 103RD 15260 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 ' TIGARD,OR 97224 11 CA-15300 2S111 CB-02601 FABE '•BE; &MARGARET H HALE RONALD A&BETH REVOCABLE 14230 0 'u LIVING TRUST ARD,OR 9722• 14925 SW 100TH TIGARD,OR 97224 • • 2S11 1 CA-10000 2S11 1 CA-08600 HANCOCK ROBERT B&KAREN M KREBS TERESA E 9867 SW KABLE ST 9940 SW KABLE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111 CB-01715 2S111 CB-01708 HANSEL JOHN C/IONA L KUEHNER RICHARD A 15285 SW 100TH AVE BARBARA N TIGARD,OR 97224 • 10260 SW HOODVIEW DR TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 CA-08900 2S 111 CA-10600 HOUGHTON CYNTHIA LU LAWTON JEFFREY&SUZANNE C 9970 SW KABLE 15237 SW 98TH TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224. 2S1 11 CA-08500 2S1 11 CA-09800 IRWIN DANIEL R AND LEHMAN CARL W AND BETTY SUE ELIZABETH E 9890 SW KABLE ST 9930 SW KABLE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S111CC-14700 2S111CA-15400 JOHNSON ALAN E AND LAURA R LILE KATHY S 10145 SW HIGHLAND DR 9890 SW PEPPERTREE LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CB-05000 2S 111 CA-08800 JOHNSON MARJORIE E LIN HUAN& 10250 SW LADY MARION DR LAI LIANG I TIGARD,OR 97224 9960 SW KABLE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CA-07500 2S 111 CB-01714 JOHNSON TODD W&DEBORAH J LONDBERG ROGER& 25420 SW MEADOWBROOK LN NASS KARI SHERWOOD,OR 97140 15215 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CA-14700 2S 111 CB-01732 JONES MALCOLM Y AND LUCAS MAURICE D AND PAMELA R JANICE KAY 10255 SW KABLE ST 9885 SW SATTLER TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CB-01600 2S 111 CA-14900 KALLSTROM EVELYN LOUISE MCCOBB JAMES E&MARILYN M J E 9975 SW SATTLER ST • 15025 SW 100TH PORTLAND,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 25111 BD-01513 25111 CB-03200 KNEZ JOHN S JR&VICKI L MCGREGOR MARK D&LYNDIA J 14980 SW 100TH AVE 10135 SW LADY MARION DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • • 2S 111 CB-01734 2S 111 CA-08400 MCKEE TERRY D PRISCILLA PAULSON BRUCE L&VERNA MCLAIN 10195 SW KABLE ST 9920 SW KABLE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CA-00700 2S 111 CB-02900 MITTELSTEDT DANIEL&WINONA V B PRATT KERRY L&JULIE M 9880 SW SATTLER ST 10049 SW LADY MARION DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 111CA-00500 2S111CB-01705 •_ ; _ _ MI TEl DANIEL&WINONA V B REED MARK LEROY&. �.,.•, .',. b ;i:. :• 9880 - ' S• R ST SHAW LILLIE GARD,OR 97224 10275 SW HOODVIEW DR TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111CA-00600 2S111CA-15500 MITT D • •NIEL&WINONA V B REED SUSAN J 9880 A ; ST 9876 SW PEPPERTREE LN T ARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 - 2S111CC-15200 2S111CA-14800 MUDROW MURIEL TRUSTEE REEKIE IAN A 10075 SW HIGHLAND DR 9955 SW SATTLER ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111 CC-14900 2S111 CA-08200 MURPHY HELEN C TRUSTEE RHODES TODD E&LISA M - 10125 SW HIGHLAND DR 9935 SW KABLE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 CB-02500 2S111 CA-09100 NESS DYANN E& SANDERS WARREN L&EVA M J STEVE 15360 SW 100TH ST . - 14977 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111CB-05300 2S111CC-15600 - •- • NOSIER BRADLEY M&CASSANDRA A SCHMOKEL MELVIN H&B CAROL TRS 10060 SW LADY MARION DR 10035 SW HIGHLAND DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR.97224.,, - . 2S 111 CA-00400 2S 111 CB-01601 OTTOMAN PATRICIA A TRUSTEE SLAUGHTER JOHN A BEATRICE 21635 SW ELWERT RD 15055 SW 100TH AVE SHERWOOD,OR 97140 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CB-01711 2S 111 CA-07200 OWEN MARY PAT SOMMERS GREG J& 10125 SW HOODVIEW SOMMERS PAUL TIGARD,OR 97224 9960 SW SATTLER ST TIGARD,OR 97224 • • • 2S 111 CA-08300 2S 111 CA-07900 SORENSEN ANNE E TRUSTEE WARD ROBERT J C/O US NATIONAL BANK OF OREGON . 15280 SW 100TH AVE BY COLLEEN.SPIDAL TIGARD,OR 97224 PO BOX 3168 PORTLAND,OR 97208 2S 111 CA-07800 2S 111 CB-03300 ST GERMAIN JOHN M&.LINDA A • WARDIN G FERD&MARION EVA& 15290 SW 100TH AVE WARDIN JOHN G&NANCY A TIGARD,OR 97224 ' 21510 SW JOHNSON RD WEST LINN,OR 97068 • 25111 CA-14500 25111 CB-03400 STARKEY WILLIAM L&BONNIE K • WA': G FERD : ARION EVA-& • ' • 9825 SW BATTLER ST WARDIN :. I G&NANCY A TIGARD,OR 97223 21511 :1 JOHN :• -D ■ ST LINN,OR 97068 2S111CA-10800 2S111CC-15700 STEPUTIS KIRK R&DONNA M . WILLIAMS MILDRED L TRUSTEE • 15213 SW 98TH AVE • 10025 SW HIGHLAND DR . TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 25111 CA-08700 2S111 CC-15000 • • STEVENS SHERYL LU WYNKOOP VICTOR R&VIVIAN A 9950 SW KABLE ST • 10115 SW HIGHLAND DR TIGARD,OR 97224 - TIGARD,OR 97224 • 25111 CA-09700 2S 111 CA-10700 STEVENSON ROBERT L&DEBORAH C • YACKLEY HAROLD G&JOAN I 13100 SW TOOZE RD . 15225 SW 98TH AVE SHERWOOD,OR 97140 • TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S1 11 CA-09000 SWAN STAN C AND CHRISTINE J 9990 SW KABLE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 25111 CB-01707 • TAENNLER ALFRED 10290 SW HOODVIEW DR TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111CC-14800 • TUCKER LILLIAN M • 10135 SW HIGHLAND DR • TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111 CA-09300 • VERDON KEVIN W& WASHABAUGH MONA G -15380 SW 100TH AVE . TIGARD,OR 97223 • • Sally Christensen Bill Finck 15685 SW 166 Avenue '9235 SW Mountairi View Lane Tigard, OR 91224 Tigard, OR 91224 Mary Ann Melvin Kristen Miller 10395 SW Bonanza Way 8940 SW Edgewood Street . . Tigard, OR 91224 Tigard, OR 91223 Stephen Bicker :=�ras•� :±-: �: .- y::� 14235 SW 97th Avenue CITY OF TIGARD Tigard, OR 97224 SOUTH 'CIT'SUBCOMMITTEE Mark Bogert l"-�i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc 14445 SW 100'Avenue �' `"x'"'"0151 ATED: 9-Jun-00 Tigard, OR 97224 ' Twyla Brady 9360 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 91223 Debra Muir 15065 SW 79th Avenue • Tigard, OR 91224 Sue Siebold 15374 SW Thurston Lane Tigard, OR 91224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 _ ., ; ,- . . Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt. #3 Tigard, OR 91224-3316 • Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 91224 • ti • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI Art OF IGARD Community DDove(opment Shaping Better Community DATE August 15,2000 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner[x 3171 Phone: (5031639-4171/Fax: (5031 684-7291 MINOR LAND PARTITION IMLPI 2000-00008 ➢ LONDBERG PARTITION < The applicant is requesting to partition one (1) existing lot of 22,651 square feet into two (2) lots of 10,046 and 12, 427 square feet. LOCATION: 15215 SW 100th Avenue; WCTM 25111 CB, Tax Lot 1714. ZONE: Single-Family Residential (10,000 Square Feet); R-3.5. The purpose of the R-3.5 zoning district is to establish large urban residential home sites. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 29, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: — ('lease provide the following information)Name of Persontsl Commenting: I Phone Humberto): CI141F TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMITS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE&COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS fi FILE NOES)... /f//�C -C cog FILE NAMES): �-o.4 /,6�' - rg CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS I4-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: Central ❑ East'SQuth ❑ West ❑ ® Also Place For Review in library CIT Book CITY OFFICES - vLONG RANGE PLANNING/Nadine Smith,Supervisor _COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Dvlpmnt Svcs.Technicians _POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer C UILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official ?'ENGINEERING DEPT./Brian!lager,Dvlpmnt Review Engineer WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,Utilities Manager _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,Gty Recorder OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,Property Manager ✓ PLANNER—TIME TO POST PROJECT SITE! SPECIAL DISTRICTS . • _TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.* OALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE * TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT * P4NIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY * Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program 15101 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 145 155 N.First Street Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97015 Hillsboro,OR 91124 . LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS , CITY OF BEAVERTON* _ CITY OF TUALATIN * _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue • 775 Summer Street NE Irish Bunnell,Development Services PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97301-1279 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING* _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE _ CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 • Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland.OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ Carol Hall,Data Resource Center(ZCA) US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP_333 SW First Avenue _ Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA2OA) Larry French(Comp.Plan Amendments Only) PO Box 2946 _CITY OF KING CITY* _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 • Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _ C.D.Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 15300 SW 116th Avenue WASHINGTON COUNTY King City,OR 97224 _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(PowedinesinArea) _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division 155 N.First Avenue CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO* Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Planning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro.OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 _Brent Curtis(CPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion(CPA) _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * _Anne LaMountain(IGA/URB) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) _Sonya Kazen,Development Review Coordinator hil Healy(IGA/URB) Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir. Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) ve Conway(General Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Sr.Cartographer kcPUZCA>Ms 14 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Jim Nims(ZCA)MS 15 Portland,OR 97204 _Doria Mateja(ZCA)Ms 14 _ODOT,REGION 1 DISTRICT 2A Jane Estes,Permit Specialist . 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 h:\patty\masters\Request For Comments Notification List 2.doc (Revised: 13-Jul-00) Portland,OR 97221-2414 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES. . . _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northem/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations only) Pat McGann (If Project Is Within%Mile of A Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Michael Kiser,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 _PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY _GENERAL TELEPHONE _ US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer Elaine Self,Engineering Lori Domey,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue MC: OR03O546 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _TCI CABLE(Apps.E.of HaltlN.or 99W) • Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Portland,OR 97232 *INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE1HlIM_IHTEEfi• 1 r 1 : : I r 1 1 r 1 It OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). . . . — _ -- immimmi > CITY of TIGARD < . ... . GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM \ AREA NOTIFIED --DR • X . , co c.) . (500') . 2511131102001: ' UJ — , :::,: CY) . • ' iittl' CB02600 ': < 'n1ta60015*' .1.; . .,-,,... :s .4. ' :::. 1,•,.. -.',,, :,•,,•,,ai-A 231113001001 '7, ,,,, ,, ,,,A ., ,, ,,,•- k, :, - *COMO., 43111311154130--4,155,=5;J'Zi, ''.: FOlk: Leigh/Land Solutions 23M31115500' 1 ,,,....,... al,,,,,,:' LADY MA/iv 41 ,...° 0'0387 B 20),,, cii4103 ,4, °toe 21111131115000, , 4,, ,- -,4 :4„ ,,.,, ,4 ,, RE: 2S1 I I CB, 1714 zitnceono) c2'Bo' IMP 321111 0 11 21111100500, • • . , , „ ; ,,, 4, • 7SI"CA4 r001Srr1410q1 1$1114, 75701 2E17 CA140,: 9028ii, ,,ma: ,04,ic W 2 11052,01 -1,4.1-1°` - .,.., , l': 11 ;:l SITE 2E111001700 mann n111001703 4, : 39050,0 , •28m0800300 <\„ Property owner information is valid for 3 months from S A 171-FRST the date printed on this map. .., • HO_ 0 "11/11111.1■... s' • - cam : 1 ,,, ,• .,:', 44 4: s'4,, . DILIk 13111C1101713, N . '-: 2311131100700' ,. ciiinui, ninoptutoo:' ., . r.,,, Isiticao1101 memos unit Bog ol I:- . .,. ... '' ' —dzioti ' , '4 ':iinicioosio 2. ' 081081 L x- /minim ,. - - - ..., , . • do , 01108110 ' 1012131100500 • 281113901721 21rnit001n0 mom 0 - • ?SMOOT/11 „1,31,11„,,C,c1171-0 , :, ,330/9'04 ,,,,, ,, i5.5 311071101, . • 08 1,0108 7 409 0 4, • • ' • ''''1 ' ,•.. ,, 411 a w ,I-LJ co - 0 < -----,.—KABLE ST 00100 , ... : , .' :,..,:te..„,%41 rst;Ao'9.,or;a0„6-';',' -, IA'oaTh'21014I'• ''''''''* , 008:00 • 311098 0 111 . A - . , :.., ,' ''' -'--- ., =-1 ` '1 -• - , ' ,-; '':: ,3".'`'..f - N „ .,... mums!211110;14800 natientsoo 2811133155002S1110115000 --- • 0800 002 0108600',-',. 5 • 3409 I,014 1 , ' 4 ,,, 2311131111115,0 „ , 23111331540 , „ . M° 2 CC15011.3 CC103 57 I . , 011. .....00 200 300 Feet 25111CC15300 '00308' 03 , 1"=238 feet 3C152! CC1590 • . . . HIG A NI B___Iig 1111111/4, .: ., .., :,,, .., ta,,,o, „-.. 14"4 4' • Onteiriiiir„,,,„,,,-,4, ,.,,„,, :.„: A 0111, I. ,:t ' '.- -:, . 4 •-:'' ,-,,-0,-* + ,,r ,.. ,,::,,'•-*,.,,,,y; r., -,,,,' ,..4Lej11 • City of Tigard _. . • in ......„,_ . ill..... Information on this map is tor general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. .l.... • 13125 SW Hall Blvd (J) Tigard,OR 97223 ---- --------------- (503)639-4171 .17...4'. egalMilliallialliklikill Illik■. . _______------J DR http://www.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jul 18,2000;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR / (me 161-- 5 ) • • 25111 CA-07400 25111 CB-01712 ANDERSON DAVID L&JILL B CARVER WILLIAM A SUSAN M 15240 SW 100TH AVE 10155 SW HOODVIEW DRIVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 CB-01718 2S 111 CB-01706 ANDERSON ROGER F AND CIROTSKI LAWRENCE L AND LAURA L ESTHER LEE 10305 SW HOODVIEW DR 10120 SW KABLE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 • 2S111CC-14300 2S111CA-15000 BAILEY CHARLES A&BETTY J COMEGYS DONALD L IDA J BY DORSZYNSKI ROBERT L CONSERVATOR 15060 SW 100TH PO BOX 3050 TIGARD,OR 97223 SALEM,OR 97302 • 2S 111 CA-07300 S 111 CA-15200 BENHAM SUSAN JEANETTE C• GYS '! ALD L IDA J 15210 SW 100TH 15061 :%' 'OTH TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD,OR 9 23 2S 111 CB-01720 2S 111 CA-07700 BILLINGS BYRON&BARBARA S TRS COOPER ARTIS W 10210 SW KABLE 5013 MILLSTONE WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 • GRANITE BAY,CA 95746 2S1 11 CB-05100 2S 111 CA-01000 BLAIS GREGORY M&BETTY A CORP OF PRESIDING BISHOP OF 15165 SW 100TH CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST LDS TIGARD,OR 97224 50 E NORTH TEMPLE#511-4705 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84150 2S 111 CA-09900 2S 111 CB-01710 BLUM JOHN E&BARBARA J CORTRIGHT ROBERT S 9889 SW KABLE ST KATHERINE A TIGARD,OR 97223 10200 SW HOODVIEW DRIVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CC-15900 111 CB-01709 BONGARD ERCYL D CO" 'IGHT ROBERT S& 10005 SW HIGHLAND DR KATHER " A TIGARD,OR 97224 1021: WHO•` IEW DRIVE GARD,OR 97223 2S 111 CA-08000 2S 111 CA-09200 • CARRIGG STEPHEN&SUSAN Y COSTANZO EILEEN M TR • 9955 SW KABLE ST 15370 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CC-15800 2S 111 CB-03100 CARSTENSEN MARGARET E CUTZ MARGARET RUTH 10015 SW HIGHLAND DR 10111 SW LADY MARION DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 • • 2S 111 CB-05200 2S 111 CB-01713 DAILER DAVID M& FAST JEFF A AND KATHY D NYQUIST JEANNE E 10185 SW HOODVIEW DRIVE 10042 SW LADY MARION DR TIGARD,OR 97224 • TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CA-15100 2S 111 B D-04000 DAVISON STEPHEN ANN FREDRICKS MARY J/BARON EDAH H 15040 SW 100TH Go REED DENNIS AND SUSAN TIGARD,OR 97224 15020 SW 100TH TIGARD,OR 97223 25111 CB-02800 25111 CB-03000 DELANY DOUGLAS G&JANICE L FREEMAN ROBERT M AND JENNIFER F 10023 SW LADY MARION DR 10067 SW LADY MARION DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111CC-15100 2S111CB-01717 DERINGTON LEMAN E&LILLIAN K T FRIEDRICH JOHN H AND 10105 SW HIGHLAND DR JANET M TIGARD,OR 97224 10080 SW KABLE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CB-01716 2S 111 CB-01703 DOHERTY KENNETH E&SANDRA L GIESBRECHT R E 10040 SW KABLE ST H DEANNE TIGARD,OR 97224 10235 SW HOODVIEW DR TIGARD,OR 97223 25111 CA-08100 25111 CB-01719 DOYLE MICHAEL P&CENDY L GIRAUD GEORGE&PATRICIA L 9945 SW KABLE ST 10170 SW KABLE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S111CC-15400 2S111CC-15300 EISEN HYMAN GOTTLIEB EDWARD F 10055 SW HIGHLAND DRIVE 10065 SW HIGHLAND DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 25111 CA-00800 2S1 11 CC-15500 EVEN MARC ROBERT/MICHELLE ANNE GUDEKUNST PETER T& WIEBE MACK/MEREDITH S DOROTHEA A TRUSTEES 9900 SW SETTLER ST 10045 SW HIGHLAND DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 25111 CA-14600 25111 CA-07600 FABER ROBERT C&MARGARET H GUEVARA RAMON V 14230 SW 103RD 15260 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 11 CA-15300 2S 111 CB-02601 FARE' -•BE' &MARGARET H HALE RONALD A&BETH REVOCABLE 14230 0 '• LIVING TRUST ARD,OR 9722• 14925 SW 100TH TIGARD,OR 97224 • • 2S 111 CA-10000 2S11 1 CA-08600 HANCOCK ROBERT B&KAREN M KREBS TERESA E 9867 SW KABLE ST 9940 SW KABLE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111 CB-01715 2S 111 CB-01708 HANSEL JOHN C/IONA L KUEHNER RICHARD A 15285 SW 100TH AVE BARBARA N TIGARD,OR 97224 10260 SW HOODVIEW DR TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1 11 CA-08900 2S1 11 CA-10600 HOUGHTON CYNTHIA LU LAWTON JEFFREY&SUZANNE C 9970 SW KABLE 15237 SW 98TH . TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S11 CA-08500 2S 111 CA-09800 IRWIN DANIEL R AND LEHMAN CARL W AND BETTY SUE ELIZABETH E 9890 SW KABLE ST 9930 SW KABLE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S111CC-14700 2S111CA-15400 JOHNSON ALAN E AND LAURA R LILE KATHY S 10145 SW HIGHLAND DR 9890 SW PEPPERTREE LN TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CB-05000 2S111 CA-08800 JOHNSON MARJORIE E LIN HUAN& 10250 SW LADY MARION DR LAI LIANG I TIGARD,OR 97224 9960 SW KABLE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111 CA-07500 2S111 CB-01714 JOHNSON TODD W&DEBORAH J LONDBERG ROGER& 25420 SW MEADOWBROOK LN NASS KARI SHERWOOD,OR 97140 15215 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CA-14700 2S 111 CB-01732 JONES MALCOLM Y AND LUCAS MAURICE D AND PAMELA R JANICE KAY 10255 SW KABLE ST 9885 SW SATTLER TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CB-01600 2S 111 CA-14900 KALLSTROM EVELYN LOUISE MCCOBB JAMES E&MARILYN M J E 9975 SW SATTLER ST 15025 SW 100TH PORTLAND,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111 BD-01513 2S111 CB-03200 KNEZ JOHN S JR&VICKI L MCGREGOR MARK D&LYNDIA J 14980 SW 100TH AVE 10135 SW LADY MARION DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 2S 111 CB-01734 2S 111 CA-08400 MCKEE TERRY D PRISCILLA PAULSON BRUCE L&VERNA MCLAIN 10195 SW KABLE ST 9920 SW KABLE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2511 1 CA-00700 2S 111 CB-02900 MITTELSTEDT DANIEL&WINONA V B PRATT KERRY L&JULIE M 9880 SW SATTLER ST 10049 SW LADY MARION DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 111 CA-00500 2S111 CB-01705 MI - TED DANIEL&WINONA V B REED MARK LEROY& 9880 -•' S• ' R ST SHAW LILLIE GARD,OR 97224 10275 SW HOODVIEW DR TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111 CA-00600 25111 CA-15500 MITT D %•NI EL&WINONA V B REED SUSAN J 9880 A ' ST 9876 SW PEPPERTREE LN ARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111CC-15200 2S111CA-14800 MUDROW MURIEL TRUSTEE REEKIE IAN A 10075 SW HIGHLAND DR 9955 SW SATTLER ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CC-14900 2S 111 CA-08200 MURPHY HELEN C TRUSTEE RHODES TODD E&LISA M 10125 SW HIGHLAND DR 9935 SW KABLE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 CB-02500 2S 111 CA-09100 NESS DYANN E& SANDERS WARREN L&EVA M J STEVE 15360 SW 100TH ST 14977 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 11 CB-05300 2S1 11 CC-15600 NOSIER BRADLEY M&CASSANDRA A SCHMOKEL MELVIN H&B CAROL TRS 10060 SW LADY MARION DR 10035 SW HIGHLAND DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CA-00400 2S 111 CB-01601 OTTOMAN PATRICIA A TRUSTEE SLAUGHTER JOHN A BEATRICE 21635 SW ELWERT RD 15055 SW 100TH AVE SHERWOOD,OR 97140 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CB-01711 2S 111 CA-07200 OWEN MARY PAT SOMMERS GREG J& 10125 SW HOODVIEW SOMMERS PAUL TIGARD,OR 97224 9960 SW SATTLER ST TIGARD,OR 97224 • • 2S 111 CA-08300 2S 111 CA-07900 SORENSEN ANNE E TRUSTEE WARD ROBERT J C/0 US NATIONAL BANK OF OREGON 15280 SW 100TH AVE BY COLLEEN SPIDAL TIGARD,OR 97224 PO BOX 3168 PORTLAND,OR 97208 2S 111 CA-07800 2S 111 CB-03300 ST GERMAIN JOHN M&LINDA A WARDIN G FERD&MARION EVA& 15290 SW 100TH AVE WARDIN JOHN G&NANCY A TIGARD,OR 97224 21510 SW JOHNSON RD WEST LINN,OR 97068 2S 111 CA-14500 2S 111 CB-03400 STARKEY WILLIAM L&BONNIE K WA-: G FERD ' ARION EVA& 9825 SW SATTLER ST WARDIN : I G&NANCY A TIGARD,OR 97223 21510 : JOHN :• -D ST LINN,OR 97068 2S111CA-10800 2S111CC-15700 STEPUTIS KIRK R&DONNA M WILLIAMS MILDRED L TRUSTEE 15213 SW 98TH AVE 10025 SW HIGHLAND DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 11 CA-08700 2S1 11 CC-15000 STEVENS SHERYL LU WYNKOOP VICTOR R&VIVIAN A 9950 SW KABLE ST 10115 SW HIGHLAND DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 • 2S 111 CA-09700 2S 111 CA-10700 STEVENSON ROBERT L&DEBORAH C YACKLEY HAROLD G&JOAN I 13100 SW TOOZE RD 15225 SW 98TH AVE SHERWOOD,OR 97140 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 CA-09000 • SWAN STAN C AND CHRISTINE J 9990 SW KABLE ST - TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 11 CB-01707 TAENNLER ALFRED 10290 SW HOODVIEW DR TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111CC-14800 TUCKER LILLIAN M 10135 SW HIGHLAND DR TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 11 CA-09300 VERDON KEVIN W& WASHABAUGH MONA G 15380 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 • • Sally Christensen Bill Finck 15685 SW 16t Avenue 9235 SW Mountain View Lane Tigard, OR 91224 Tigard, OR 91224 Mary Ann Melvin Kristen Miller 10395 SW Bonanza Way 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 91224 Tigard, OR 91223 Stephen Bicker CITY OF TIGARD 14235 SW 9r Avenue SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 91224 Mark Bogert 14445 SW 100th Avenue is\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc UPDATED: 9-Jun-00 Tigard, OR 91224 • Twyla Brady 9360 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 91223 Debra Muir • 15065 SW 19th Avenue Tigard, OR 91224 Sue Siebold 15314 SW Thurston Lane Tigard, OR 91224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 91281 Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt. #3 Tigard, OR 91224-3316 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 91224 FROM : LAND_SOLUTIONS, Inc. • PHONE NO. : 15037228555µ • Jul. 18 2000 10:13AM P1 . Postal"Fax Note 7671 Data �� Qa oe°yes/ • To CITY OF TIGARD . ��„ iaroi.� �.re"L-:, : � A COMMUNETf DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT y _ ::a PLANNING ONISION 3n7 Of IMAM comma*Oeverorate 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD .Shag A®sstsrcmoosiniey TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PONE: 50-e37-4171 iii 501.1433-12,91 gitSTC Puy or 9+IAeyirlscau,g) R Qf#E�ST 00- '110 P DP[:1TY 11N,NER MAI[INC LIST Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request • INDICATE ALL PROJECT SlAP &TAX.jQT NUMBERS (i... Is134AB,.Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW and INCLUDE A MAP OF ALL LOTS FOR THE PROJECT ire(erably assessor's tax map): • S - l (A)_. . c► c Lor I t`l 167—[ '-5 (bo -Th2 • INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTING 2 OR 3 SETS OF LABELS: (NOTE: A minimum of 1 sem of labels will be provided to place on your 2 sun of entedope that applicants are required to submit at the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood meeting is required and you have not yet held that meeting,you should request 3 sea) • NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: L-e PHONE: i2Z This request may be mailed, faxed,- or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request in "Will Call" by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined_ PLEASE NOTE; FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Coat Dy5lziption: 511 to generate the mailing fist, plus$2 per sheet for printing the Est onto labels(20 addresses per sleet). Then multiply the cast to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. *EXAMPLE* ,� * * COST FOR THIS REQUEST f * j_,sheets of labels:s2!stieet: gin x 1_sets = S16.00 sheets)of!obeli r S2/sheet=; M x A sen= 5a/�, I,sheets of labels x S2/sheet for DT area x 3,tell = S 4.00 -L sheet(s)of labels x SlJshect fer1C.IT am = S °� x t seta z S 4 GENERATE UST= 511.00 90" GENERATE LIST = I • TOTAL= S31.00 • TOTAL m S • , , ,.. . IP • Customer Receipt CITY OF TIGARD Printed:07/19/2000 14:31 User:front Station: 02 Operator: KJP Rcpt No: 0003821 Date: 07/19/2000 Customer No:000000 Amount Due: 35.00 Name: ROGER LONDBERG Cash: 0.00 Address: 4618 FOX LANE S Check: 35.00 SALEM, OR 97306 N/A 0.00 Change: 0.00 Type Description Amount RECEXP Recovered Expenditures 35.00 r ^ . . - . .� I Cl 93 8 WILL CALL/PICK UP Fill out this form completely and attached it securely to the document(s). Bring it to the WILL CALL/ PICK �V� d UP area at the Front Counter and file in the . appropriate alphabe ical slot by last name/company. ' TO:Oft' ,j COMPA Y NAM pi / i DOCUME►� ' AME: ' A ,//106 17 4 FROM: _ 0f/�,� �WW1 DEPARTMENT: * �/ DATE TO WILL CALL: i DD FEE: 6 bail) ' If the document is of picked up within 5 working days of the "DATE TO WILL CALL", the document will be returned to the originator. RETURNED TO ORIGINATOR DATE: 4/20/01 Conditions Associated with Case #: MLP2000-00008 L r 8:29:18 AM pit Cond. Stat. Changed Up• . e• Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By 0003 STREET OPENING PERMIT/P-IMP PLANS 0 Met 11/2/00 BDR 11/2/00 PLN 1. A Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the roadway work and sanitary sewer tap in SW 100th Avenue. The applicant will need to submit five(5)copies of a proposed public improvement plans for review and approval. NOTE: These plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 0002 PRVD P-IMP PLAN/COMPL AGRMNT INFO 0 Met 11/2/00 BDR 11/2/00 PLN 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal,the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement(if one is required)and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example,specify if the entity is a corporation,limited partnership,LLC,etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 0001 ADDRESSING FEE 0 Met 12/5/00 CMC 12/5/00 CMC 3. Prior to approval of the final plat,the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30. 0001 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS 0 Met 10/24/00 BDR 10/24/00 BDR 4. The applicant's public improvement construction plans shall indicate that they will make roadway improvements to SW 100th Avenue adjacent to their site to provide the following: A. removal and replacement of existing pavement section such that the resulting paved width of the roadway is 28 feet;B. establish a three-foot wide rock shoulder adjacent to the new edge of pavement;and C. modify the existing roadside drainage ditch if necessary. 0001 OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES 0 Met 11/22/00 BR 12/1/00 BDR 5. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 100th Avenue underground as a part of this project,or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be$27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen,the amount will be$5,225.00 and it shall be paid prior to approval of the final plat. 0001 STATE PLANE COORDINATES 0 Met 2/15/01 BDR 2/15/01 BDR 6. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system(GPS)geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates,the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: a)GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey;b)By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. 0070 F-PLAT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS: 0 Met 2/15/01 BDR 2/15/01 BDR 7. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Submit for City review four(4)paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon,and necessary data or narrative. B. The final plat and data and narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes(ORS 92.05), Washington County,and by the City of Tigard. C. NOTE:Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive a letter from the City Engineering Department indicating: 1)that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor,and 2)that the applicant has either completed any public improvements associated with the project,or has at least obtained the necessary public improvement permit from the City to complete the work. D. Once the City and County have reviewed the final plat,submit two(2)mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer's signature. 0001 RECORDED FINAL PLA 0 Not Met BR 9/28/00 ST 8. The applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a mylar copy of the recorded final plat. 0001 WATER QUALITY FEE 0 Not Met BR 9/28/00 ST 9. Prior to issuance of the building permit for Parcel 1,the applicant shall pay the standard water quality fee per lot(fee amount will be the latest approved by USA). SkL711,44 Page 1 of 1 Route To: Surveyor ✓ Development Review Engineer FINAL PLAT REVIEW CHECKLIST Plat Name: LoNpfa e[l (7 ,-r i Case Number(s) N' Zci -peoog Address: 5 ZAGS 5v,) lw " (Do NOT release addresses to the public without consent of the Engineering Department.) Contact name and phone C -jz re £ Jc fit 5 Gr-,o —ote6 II (Fill in when plat is dropped off) DATE RECEIVED: I t 12 t I DATE FORWARDED TO SURVEY: it I Z1(cr:› SURVEY SECTION Check if Check if Considered Okay 1. Street alignment and width, continuity El' 11 ❑ 2. Curve,corner, cul-de-sac radii 0 if ❑ 3. Dedication,vacation, easement conveyance N L 4. Residential Survey Certificate match the map [/ Comments: ��e 6��% F�Cere,J f 6 e -' 'o f 1 t S c v Sfu fe p l"' C veto!,' By: G�" r "l ��'//�: Surveyor's Signature Date Page 1 of 1 I Et4GPW V-DEWEN-PLAT.DOT Route To: 1. Planning ✓ 2. Building ✓ 3. Engineering Tech I ✓ 4. Development Review Engineer I FINAL PLAT REVIEW CHECKLIST Plat Name: L )C) PA/2Tjtjj Case Number(s) !J\a 2000-Oxo6 DATE RECEIVED: 1E721�, ./•,) co 41N- DATE FORWARDED TO PLANNING: l 1 L't(c50 To: AA 1-f 5 , Planning Division Check if Check if Considered Okay 1. Phase boundaries 2. Lot and/or tract size and configuration 3. Lot numbers 4. Access restrictions, reserve strips P "C 5. Condition of Approval Satisfied C 1 6. Public & Private streets(location, width, etc....,) L 7. Preliminary Plat approval date- 1 yr period OK 8. Special Deed Restrictions(C.C.&R's) ❑ j 9. Open Space (Deed or Dedication) E 10. SPECIAL SETBACKS ARE 11. Assign Case Number(above) LI LI Other Comments: By: '00,0 Q,„ Signatur: (( /Dat FORWARDED TO BUILDING DIVISION: ii ■ •at- Page 1 of 4 I.IENGIPRI V.OE W1N-PLAT.DOT - BUILDING DIVISION Comments: By: Building Dept. Signature Date FORWARD TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (Attn.:Engineering Tech/Engineering Records) Date ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (Engineering Tech) Check if Okay Street Names Acceptable EPA" Manhole Numbers ❑ Assign Address(s) - (front page) L� Address Fee(URB Projects Only): / lots @$30.00/lot=$ SO (le? PC1 [Fr Update City-wide maps [� Comments: By: / /? i( J 7) (G 4 i 4 -0 Engineering Tec 's Signature Da e FORWARDED TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ENGINEER Page 2 of 4 IAENGIPRIV-DEVVIN-PIAT.DOT I/ &tJ 10 o CU &i (, rill l&g- Or-7/1 szu )oo(lb C�U.Q• ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Check if Okay Public Improvement Plans Approvable/Approved ❑ Public Improvement Fees/Deposits Li Right-of Entry, Release& Waivers, Easement (onsite - offsite) Public Improvement Agreement LI Public Improvement Assurance Conditions of Approval Satisfied? Li Sewer Availability Letter Prepared Joint Access,Non-Remonstrance Agreement ❑ Comments: By: Development Review Engineer's Signature Date Page 3 of 4 I:1ENOPRIV-DEWIN-PLAT.Dar Returned to Surveyor for Correction BY: DATE: 12-(140 NAA 144 Fax to County Surveyor: "OK to review" BY: 02— DATE: �Ifi l� Corrections Reviewed and Approved BY: DATE: 1 1z,t crl Forwarded for City Signatures BY: DATE: Copy of Signed Plat Made and Put in File BY: DATE: Released to Developer for Recording BY: DATE: Authorize Eng. Tech Ito release addresses BY: Date: Copy of Signed Plat to DST's BY: Date: Page 4 of 4 I:\ENGPRIV-DENF N-PLAT.DOT PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES 6.1 iI ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q City nT9'D Oregon Shaping A Better community PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Mantel: 25111 CB Tax Lottsl: 1714 Use Type: Residential Partition The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ;c W � '� o feet ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet Pfrkt : -I kAftk ❑ SW to feet �6 � .�,rye . ‘,14d \00 1 - cek Street improvements: ." Z k - i�� �'R' ® 1/2 street improvements will be recess: . a -! SW 100th Avenue, to include: ® 16 feet of pavement from centerline to curb ® concrete curb ® storm sewers and other underground utilities 5-foot concrete sidewalk ® street trees spaced per TDC standards. ® street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes - Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department Section street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk. ❑ street trees • ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. • Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement • • district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) SW 100th Avenue. (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: ® Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW 100th Avenue. Prior to recording of the final plat, the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers:. The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located SW 100th Avenue. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to tap the main line and extend two laterals to each parcel to serve the existing house and the new house. Water Supply: The City of Tigard (Phone:(503) 639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: . Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 526-2469] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Submit a plan for how the new house and lot will be drained to the public system. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Englneering Department Section Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted. with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ❑ Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ® Payment of the fee in-lieu. Pay this fee only for the new lot. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment. until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. Pay TIF on the new parcel only;payable at the time the building permit for the house is pulled.. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section - , Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way • or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. This type of permit requires a non-refundable $150.00 fee. In certain cases, where City costs may exceed the $150.00 fee, an administrative deposit will be required. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. This type of permit requires a deposit to be submitted with the construction plans. The amount of the deposit depends upon the overall value of the public improvements. The City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written•City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial; industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Sectlon Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter.for more information. • • GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in . determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. • • PREPARED BY: E INEERING PARTMENT STAFF Phone: [5031639-4171 Fax: (5031 684-7297 i:\eng\brianr\templates\preap notes-eng.dot.doc Revised: April 21,2000 • • • • • CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section • n•I _ K 103RDA% � 103RD p _ _ AVE �� . ::.z.......:.....::::-.._„:„:..............,-.::::........ii.:..„,::::(..........;:.::::::::::1:::::::ii:::,....1::::::.:1:::::•:::::-.,....:.:::::::::-.,:::1-:•:::::::...!:::::-!..::::::::.::::!:i:,::::::.::::.:•.::::...'.'•:::.'„::::-.•::'-::::::::.:::;,.::::;-:::::-.1.:-.1E.....,...,:...'.,-:':::!::::..::::::::.:',..:'''''' ; - -.. - ',..••••••-••••• ........ : - . . . :. _ ..... ,.....:.. ... ..• :.,.• .,--•- i-----10i,.,:::::::::•-.-..........:::: :----:-.... • • • ••••• ••• .;.:1..:::-. ...:.•----- --•..••• •••::::•••:::::::::::::::w....„:::::::-Q .----,--------:::---------- .-„-::--- ---:•-..„:::„..--- : .....:- ------------------------------------- -- -.. . .......,...„........_:::: o :. ..:........::.... i.:....................:........,.. .. .........: . ....:::::;c.:....................:..:::::,...,.............,.........„.:,..:.:.::::............. ..........„::.:•:.:.......:. ..........:.:::::.......:::_„::::"...... _.. .. , . .:... . ............ <_... ......,........::_:...:......:•:.:"...,........................ .,„.....:.,..... ..::::::::i....:i;:„........,:..„;,.,.:...........,.._: ,..„.... ..... .. . ............... ........,..........................,..............„....... . ............................,...„„„ . ..... .. ....:5:::„.•••••.::::,:-.:.:_,: _:,.:„...::::::::..„....:........::.:::..i.„.„:„..•._ ,.. „_____._, ___-, - .. ...... . ....... ... ..."...:..............,....:„.................. : .:....,: •:.. . ..... .. .. .. ..•••••• • r. . ....... .. ..•.•:.........• ,._.....,..80::::::: ::::::...,...„:::...........::::.......::::::.::::.....•:„....::::::_::::::::E::::,:,...................„:• ::::•::::::;E:....-....„:::::H:::...::-,::,:::::..„.....:--:-_,----- ::,-.-.----- . . .... .. ... . .. ... . . . _ .. .. ..... .........,.... ..:.............„...„:„•:•:• .. .........,..„......:„...,:.: ....................,...„. ..... ...........:....i.... . . ..._., ..... . . . „....... .. . . .. _ _I . .. . ../. . ..:co..........:... :... .. .:.. , .. ... .„: . ..... .. . .. • . . , .. . . . • i_. .....i......... ........ .. . .... .... ... ....., ,.. ..:........ ... , . .. �i 100TH AVE_ • . "............ .:...:...,.......................:...................:...................:......::, al I _z J . . \2 .--:-:::::::::::::::::::.:::::.:.---::::•!,::!..-..,!,..!.1,-.1....::::::-::::::••••:.:11....::•....!-..::::,„.------::::::::::::::.:.i...i...1.:1.,....:::::::;::-.:,..:::-..--...1:::....iii..-7......-•.::::::::::::,,....:::::i.:J.2.!-::::!--:.:- ..:-..::::::::••:::::::::::::::::-:-.ii,....--....-..-...„,::-................ ..........I . .. . . 4 ■ 4 "'. . -- -....::::....., ,:::.......- --,..--..:,- - - .-. ---,:-------ft-,..-....i:i.ii:JF:.!:::!!::::,::::-4. : -... . ... - ' , AVE 1Q$TH AVE'•,.....,:,..........,.....::„...i.......,............,..„: .,............. .. • :„. -...:,..:::::::::.:E ....":',;••,", ,,'."'",•':•",":"-:•:::-::::------- . ,.:,......"..„..:.....,............::::.:.,:.......,......:„...,:..."...:::„..................:::::::.......-...."-....:::::....... .:..6,-...__--..„...--.,..-__-• .... . .w .....".....''......Ill .........i.lii::!....:**:::::!:: .:.'.::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::',.:'.:::::(iii:::iliE.:::::....„11:i-,:::::::::':;.:-...i.i.:;::::::':;11:-:::;::;:i''::::::::::•-•:•;-,;1:;.1::::::-;::1;...1:;;:::::;;-:::;:--1:::1-::''''''''''''''''-:::.'::::'::.-:':::':1-.."-.'''...,''''''';11.;"':':::::'::;;.*:::::•1!:::::':::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::'!! \.,...:-..„-:.:-....._•:.._:,...,..::::-..,:-•:.:•:.:.:,..--:••••••:-- •••••- idiliL4-......... - -:::' 10 10 :"..,, ......:.„.."".....„.....„........„......."...i,..........:.:„.................:,.....:.:„.......................1....,.,....:...........:................7'......e.,::::.•••:•••;:i....::..-::::•...----.......:::::::......10E-r.---._::::.,...:-.r. ..--::::::-..1r::::::........• :::::::::„.-----„i:',.11g.i.o:„-.."-„„:::::.:!":::1"""::: -------"--i' -',":','"''':::::1,7•".:::••••::::•::••••••"::::-•:::-.,i'-ii.ii.ii:-!::-:„:"-""-•;.,i!:.i -..--:i:-...iii.iii-:!:•::::>:'•,::::;'•:,•i".:...'iii-i'::::::--i!'ii'.:1'.::'• - • ' - --- '...WL):-.?:.::.:'.1."":::::::'''''"''' '''':::'"'""'.'"::::''''''"•:"'''''''''''''''''':'".--- in (A (2 ,-2.2s1,.. L '(97 - Pe r P - of bcgr7cs,-, C oh ^r°rence own 'rS 0_2 e r L ci b-er Cji) c r� Ny-s r.eSS /S-2_/_5- S, GJ / OD h s+ r� c� 9722_ 1-/ "r /-e pi; or 670 - 70S 3 (' 'o1^4 e fi - cod r 0Q5 / // e6 - 0/ 7/ 41 b -escr1P-1-,oki o -r- ProPoSg le) d U q ml r!or L4,7 c pa(-4-i i-14,7 Gnu SPII'1- D icf one /O, 00 so u4t-2 F-o0 ÷ L a -1-. T h-e /6 -F 1,Jo u // 6 te., us- -ec r -I';, .C' C c..)S-J-ru c--717 o 7 c -4' < _S-1.15 i-e reS i hC2 1 ov-ie C1—e _ �-Ooc ; (n1 r7 1 eX1S7i :,,y- home lee . -71-0 d-2 hoo •C up -o C I7 y S or ? 7-71- /s oc, q .S.,,-F-4/c St., rr-f`-e. /7 ow . ri ob 4:1 5('`) 1,1 --/- -7\ a'd , Oh CI. Qi yo (7)C) _Si 751 • ry • �I 1!1 N ' R°° m w r eve* • N i$ J Q:: ti:r� o W 9f'L9 o. a l l • 10'01•. .. r:: r c8 891 o'o oco N .r. 'n O O ,,, .,.... .... .., ,.,. , .., ... 1. ,_ ... ... . ..t.. ° h e Y 1 1 r �l it 1 N •h , �,5.� •Ir. __11 0 5, •� V �- �' r. , .. ;r .,7, t,t il.. .� g _t•• r, OQ'00l v ;., .,: 9'08•-t rr: 13 • -. �, 'OOl OO�I. N' .a- 00 3 -00 • �p na: :°i •ti 1. bE rr: :. ^ •lo: �/ [V N / I.�'` 88 (�8 y�NAD: y'M1'' N t� .:0 ll>`+'<, :08'9 e Z p :. / 14'9£1.;.:.• 00'OL. '0... O O ,18'99 00'88 0. -!..:;.:;:;i:::::':..;3',..:.7.. . , .., ., .. . •,....,. ,:. ••.... -iii ,,, • „.': :r r p .y� 8 .'<L's ;V 7t, V'. f:yi:' T •r .- N. .ri o F , i� N+ n v .o. r' �i p, a / N•_ i•t:ry"4 I. r09 ^?S i l9' 9' '99 ' 7'::.•!'''''''''''• 06' 00'0 Ob'OL 9 00'£ 00 i• �•oit ,00 9' 9 00'00 : 0. 0t ': E l �O \\\\\\\\<'' L 0 j sZ M00-61-009 2b S' 1oa� �, 771(-1.1‘ H 1o•o• , nr •..•9e4, \ \ :\\'`\\\\\\\`. .. OL'Z8 ll 00'061' 00'Otl _Q 9Y9£t d :: Qi1L •• 09 ,d 09 p og �' �y O % z ,Ti 03 N T ,-- •'� to 4 r ' y -^/ �( (n� I• ., LL'Lll • 7th X. Y� FY -- G ,03.03 •r ,, O G W 0013£1 —� 00'00 / i 9Z Lll O U $I N N i.Ib O 98'YEl O a NN j in ea ' qq � co 1 CA el W Lf'Zll ''m at r r•. m �'O R ° 80'6El `t c- r r ��ff p +- N t LLI m Q> ;O OM ..--1 T � = m ~* M H a H •,• It7 I _ 31.2 : l9'fL ZE'BOL ,0 Et'9El ;re L L9'Zll IL �r� $0 DRIVE (n r, o m r 1� m g m r :j ~' 1 m r y h N 68'8E 00'041 r' �i 39t•'90-009 '- t') Y Z8'EUi ,,o yo 89'Zll O ° •a' �� ` LOBOS ro �� o ;;•. • 89'L9!'�.....4 1. • • cy n .- '°a rn • • r p M H ON nn•nom. �5\\\\\\\\\`.O 1�`C\\\\\\\\\�.V\\\\\\\\ f_• / J ' jyrfel J/ / ray.a _,,,' a o0 a 0/4 401 - �` ���� i.7 14# 4 _ _ ,,...� � 300 •�� �_ _ . ..„.... AI=Far,....we.- , 90.......__770: ). : •i *.-4 ■ .. - ,7,4111-rx awl 2 4 % 4 :0°i w 7 , ferrpr D ,4 MI *40 0 l'Ola A 146... - . .:ocaNO * ;• ir v.— t 44 , 4 jedoair ..0. , ,.._ ________: ___2__ Aek._ 4...-Aiiiiiiittrio.. ,, immommilow4 2• O . . a, r/e ;eto x 1 • S 3 I(; Mr Ilk 1, , 0* ..V y;� ,o �2 t � l • * � J•� 3 '^ � � s • .4 mss:�i .I 4 ` Q 4 los ,,,,,ammil _4110 _ ......„,... ,.. .... - 40.0 ■• 1-1Pil 0 111 *II lalliii N 1111.1 6.givphilli is sir...,. , 4.,.., ■IIR IN . 1 .. . , „.1,,,-... .. ."1 _-,4■0______,I. .I S W. KABLE ®lm_ X255.I Ip,jT a sam ° ,moo 0-1-mk . we- impatma, . .. pi— o . i t i --- -' �- �--�� X O (M H) C , i X X ! X x ril A f���� I M.H. v M.H. 1 7-/-- --- 4/27/00 Parcel Summary Report For Parcel #: 2S111 CB-01714 • 9:16:29 AM Size: 0.00 Acres Notes: Zoning: R-3.5 Status: Active Complan: L Creation Date: Legal Lot? Updated:01/10/2000 Parcel Use: Single Family Updated By:TSA TOPO Map:4619 COMM PNL#: Water Service TIG Jurisdiction TIG Flood Zone:NON Sewer ServiceSWR CIT: S Plat Name Subdivision:HOOD VIEW Div: Block: Lot: 013 Valuations Land Value: $67,720 Building Value: $56,310 Total Value: $124,030 Site Address • Status Address 15215 SW 100TH AVE People Role Type Last Name M.I. First Name Address 1 Address 2 City State Zip Phone 1 Ext.1 Phone 2 Ext.2 OWN MARTIN,JUDITH+HUNT,TROY do OACE,JON R 2335 NW 29TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97210 Notes: Page 1 of 1 CARVER August 29, 2000 06°C) TO: Brian Rager, Planner Pv , Matthew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner �;-� � City of Tigard aO•\‘, FROM: Bill and Sue Carver 10155 S W Hoodview Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Re: File No. MLP 2000-00008 Londberg Partition COMMENTS: We submit the following comments and concerns regarding the above partition which abuts the east side of our property line. While we are concerned about the shape of the partition since it wraps around the current house on the property creating an odd "L" shaped lot, our major concern is the unimproved road (west half of 100th)that fronts both lots. In 1984 when the property on the eastside of 100`h was developed, a one-half street improvement was made. When we inquired back in 1984 as to when the westside of 100`h would be improved, we were advised that when the property abutting 100`h was further developed the road would be completed. However, it has come to our attention that the current owner, Roger Londberg will not be required to do any road, curb or sidewalk improvements. While we understand Mr. Londberg not having to install curb or sidewalk since there are none on either side of his property, we do feel he is responsible for the road and that we as taxpayers should not be subsidizing this improvement on his behalf If Mr. Londberg had been a long time resident or had planned on continuing to live on the property, then he would be a taxpayer helping to subsidize this improvement, but he is not. Mr. Londberg bought the property with the sole intent to improve the current house, divide the property, sell both the house and new lot and to move on. We, as permanent residents in this area, will still be left with an unimproved road that does not have sufficient paved width for cars to pass safely. We feel it is only fair that Mr. Londberg bear this expense from his profits and not shift this cost to the taxpayers of Tigard. Thank you for taking our concerns into consideration. 7i/i/a , 1LPZ000 - °ono gir mA Ps f_Et. -- 6 0 . ......... ' • I — , - ..., R . ,t ...: „ ._ . - ,... ... . _p :it A ____ ,_... 21 1 .,9 _ , ___.... . ._ _ ,...._„.......__,._____... , fr -.'''. R :::;` :45V''''''''4' "r rNi • .., ..„--,;,,,, ,a, , * .- ,- -''. •- — ta*„it........; 4,...,4: ai,.. t...L, ,j) •' 1 t .4*,,,e, ‘ I I. ',,ei. - '•'- - • ,,,,,,,,,i, , .4'7400 - - --- -,4 PARTITION _ _ . . ,( ., ., , PLAT . .... ..... ,.., , S. W. LADY MARION DRIVE .., „,...., 1...)F'D (..-.'1.„.I IV 17'1.-N T Nn 1.' REPL A I (:',F. L',)T 1 ..-5, H c,;(,..)D VIEW IN THE (1,:,.W. 1 /4 '..--;,--E ,- 'II(7.)N 11 .1-.2¼ R,I W, W,M . --t- I ,.. CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON .,, , \‘' JUNE 14, 2000 SCALE 1 "=30' i-.., . , ,r, , I I . , .0 PLANNING FILE NO. MLP 2000-000088 , ,, . . ..,...,, . _,.(-...,, SHEET 1 OF 2 , 1 , _ , i 25' ,., i 1 . . c--, ' 1 \■., ., ',....., 1 1 C 4 r . ' I L .._... _...,. ... ... ......_.. _........ ._,........... • ;•,,, 9'41'00" E - CD S w SATTLER STREET ,,...,,, ..., . (- . ,.. x, * ':•-•••Z,'j' \--,.. ,,,',/,.• ' • ,, ' . .,...„ .,„„-. -.,„-' • . r';‘-''' 't,7' ' - '''- ' - , ! 1 . -\ n! - - . c----i ; I •\„§:,•• ,,,„%. '4C")' • (.\.I --__, . : NT) . 1 i co cift;\'.' k i l- ' /, „,,,, 1 LE e D: , ,-, Jrt.....,tl ".., m,._,,,,,,,_„ _.....-......„- C.; 5 I.T 5/8 X 30 IRON ROD Wf RED PLASTIC • . i'''; --').1 , ;\ f. , i ./ '' C A SCRIBED "C EN TE Rt.iN E C ONCE P 1 , k D ) ___., I , 1 . . . i oN _., 2000 HELD FOR i , ,. ,., ,.. 1 INITIAL POINT HC LD FOR ' 'I: ) N Oi`1H LINE / N.kti. GDR N E R CE ' HEL /-- N 9 44 59 W -0 D BEN t, TIED AT LB J5 • .1 0 FOLV\ID 5/8" IRON ROD W,/ YELLOV,I PL ASTIC . ' 0"---1 i , 1 i I-(-)T 13. "'.-..0 OD vIE W" --71 / ■ i C AP SCRIBED E2 ' 3 LS 67" ,. r ROM P AR TIT!ON -2L A T T-40, ''',9q 7--058 1 I / K S 89'45'00 15 ',25.00-1,P4,)-') \ I (.1 --- 1 I ,......„ ---- — „ r _ 9'4459 124.90' :Ct I il n FP0.O..M fM "N , H OROGD D '--._.. '15 95 0 15.93 . '0)2)) - I, '4t. LIJ '-'--„ 1 A _.0.,if,-,ii). .1,,./6" ii--,..)ON ROD f`,/ i...Li NI IN UM CAP L.._.. . _. L.. CP 5 Lc S.Ci-RIBED f:i, & L Pi.S 1989 0 ' ,....=4 ,.., = ct-, , / z :311 =,R"OM P L A[ OF M AR ION ESTATES" BOOK 8 N, ,, 6, PAGE8 31-33 „.._. I ■ ' it!' i 0 -t • , ., 0 . IT Ct.)N D )/8 !IRON ROD „...,,,,,„... , i cr) p, \,.) ti ...., ,. ,...... 1?7'. D LI., ri._ z PARCEL 1 1 c•N ' ''--- a)..-;•7 it -0 CO ,,--t-: ARE A130 1 ' . / ' . . , ' ,',.n K :y ,,,, „IT,C.OR 0 fr.)i s T AN GE s & P.F4,,RING . 1 a , .. I . . . . - • -j.• . . . . :. . . . _ . . W f f.-- OTH - .. r Of ECIIIILIPUS , ,,.., . ., \-4'-'3 . . _ ,. ..._,,..... , . _ 1 ,C.; i " ['. S I. -• '"---0...I R'E.-- Nurv151-: ' ---- ' , ' 1....., Uj C., , -..,.,..- 1 .1 4 41 ' • .,3C:P OW) '' 2—,,,, I , ...I .D.' , P1 ----. PLAT OF "Ha.7.-ID Vii:'N", BOOK 23, PAGE 39, . . -..„- k...„, S t89'44-'59- E 86.80' : ' --,1-: , b WASHINGTON COUNTY PL AT REG OP.DS. 1.?.,, 0" [ CI).-—-- - - - i- : . ,,-.), . P P2 - PART=TiON PL A I NO, 1997-058, . .. 77 Z 5.O' *,,,,4 .- • 0 ._ 1 1 WASHiN C TON COUNTY PLAY RECORDS ,..77-_•• -- -***------ 33,5 f- ..- 0 . ,L,--) --- 1 .., N > ,...,., .,..,,, . ,....„ .., , f 7) ',,„..1 1 IN „. , . ' 0 C) E XtSTING SOUSE '-**------- ,33.4: i---- < 1 p . \ 4N..., . _-•--- , •,._.., ,,,- , • : , . .--4 I ' • . . • 0 ' i I it V . - ,.....- .--- . :-., Z.1 .2 4' . . •, . °I -r, 'C;) , ' , 1 DE D:DUCI IC , . - i CD f, _ ...„ . -... .._........ , ) 0 SCALE 1- = 30 - . . . ...„ .._ if i t. 2(-Pt', S 89'4459" E i . : . . . . I .... , 32 22 ,c; ,......-, THE': LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS ()F ALL OBjECTS ,:,... e ': . 00N 5 T9.'4 TED IN OR ON THE GROUND (STRUC TUE ), . . : ' ,.......,,c-...p , I 4' 1 .• : ?.7,I CLUDINC.1 PAVED AREAS. E..;*JS TING ON THE SI"rE ARE , 0--, _,,,,,,, , ,---, -... ucctDc.,,c-,us ' ACCUR A TEL SHOWN ANO L011ED ON TI-4IS : : \ ' - - PARCEL 2 , „.„,„ ,. . .• , .. ,.. , .._ 1 . 1, SUP P L EVEN T A,i... Si,JR VE Y. ,-.4 „ P:F,.I-, ,2,40 3 S,F, 1 . . (.n , - - 0 h , I v 4:41t -t0 ...6jis ---,-- 4 I i /0 7-- 1?6" . ; ..-- -., . 0.. f*----t—H 'rql . f 1 1. C.Pdc • ° ,- '. I 1 : , ,."-A'.ofb -,:a-- , : I 11 S/aff' P 14tie ' . 1 .. , -0 ,---.) , .. .,. ‘ - 1 i zi i ----,,, ,:„,-, CM D (..)F.v. I - - - - ' I --- (/'' r 1 • . '4 . •._ i ..1 '140) lo 4,,,,,. ,,,, 1 .......,.. i 'L --i"----- *I '7..k I CO/0 0 f . - - -%' '.•' GARAC --'4H ..,..- .... i..... 1 > : 2 3.W .. \7,,,...... , i PR". - .:-= 0,4AL - . i .,. , 1 Itm .“,, A1 •..,. . . .., :„,. r p F tr ..),, ,...."-..t 1 ,„ LAND Stift:..': 'Av.' 1 il it :,..-. ..„7. k ,, ,,,,,,,,'....„,...,,, A ,,, -., -,. 1 .:-. ., ; ' - ' -.— 4,,,,.--'-•-i - . , „ .._.. __ k3 •-, i,4 ... ,,-,•:”...,--, 4., i ' • . . .--4"'"` ' . . Cr-,AS,4 LiNiK I'f'NCE ;73, :'-'-, • I 1 , ' . . .) '',.■ , 1 • ''''? ' --‘' '1\A‘Jt- 6 ' . 1 --.--,1 ! LLI . ' `-..41YpY, - 't..,-- .—...-. ... .., . _, 1.„N 89'4-., (,0- ,,t,„ ,,,-..n ry ,'p I is., .. . . : f ..,,,, ,, N 89'34'22" w 100 07' i ,,,,,r, 4 1 u. ii•31.:,, • ' , INOB970.1 0 ' JULY 16, I 1'.87 - "` • . ,_-- ' I > ,.::: ' . ,-. , WADE G. .DONOVAN III .........- - .. , ....__._- — •-- CD ';'''' ... . ,_. ,_ . __,......._ ... .... ,__. ir,. r HEL,C; ' '1/444. 2276 - f'', ' .. . , • -... r:, „ ., ',/g L,i D THROUGH DECEMBER -..-51, 2001 0 ,-.,., i L._ ; .. . ,:r't { .. . ...,„.. . . . , ..-31 N 0 >: 1 ,,......., .. . ,.:-). . .-0,” I - , ,, , , ,,--; I HEREBY CERTIFY, THIS IS A TRUE AND EXACT COPY 1 'T-- . k,,l - --,b' I ,...,„‘,..,,....,--0- OF THE ORIGINAL PARTITION PLAT . ., .. . . , 1 . . . . . ,.,, „, 2 5' ::'.:,:- ,, . . , • V) . ) \ . , , ,,,,, . • ,..:,-,;:. ‘‘ . • , . , . „,-,t, , i I , i .„,,,,, ,..,, i • ,, , ,...•-, 1 . , , {,.• . 1 , (.',en t€...-r 1 1 n e C on c.-_, p t.,s 1 ri.c.-..„ ...,..., , _ It . , (.1% 543 821,0 DRI VE CL ADSTONE„ ORE‘O-N 97027 :..D . . , , i . . : . I 50„,-5 60-0188 FAX 503 1 : , . I i EMAIL WiPiW.MEM AILCH EVANE T,COM- . E3r.'-.;T ----., lf) ....... 1 , • • !DR A VC BY:MSG CHECKED BY:.WGOtti ACCOUNT #150-359 „ M:.\EiND_',\,i.,..0rD-3859: LONOPART:,. „.,,,, .. .. , „„ ,... r..1•r' ' .•,., .` . . r • . . -. ' ,- _ . -- ,■•■■ ■ ■■ • • ■•■■•■. ''..,_,, ,• •■.••,■{ .... .,. ,. , ... ■.., ,.`r , ..•■ ,. • . , . ,`•, • . ■ . • ' n . • . .. . . . ■. . . ■ . . . • r . . • . . . . • .. . . • . . . . .• ' ' ■ . . ■• . ■■ •. . • • ... v . • . • ■ ■ ,, . . . . • .•■ / . . ■,,, r• • . .' . ' ■, . •• . . ,• „ .r r . • •. ' ' , „., „ • ,• '. . ' ■•, . •.■.. . .... ■- , .''' • . '.• ','.'',..,5`'',,,,..';,,,.{,i''' '''''..'''''''. ''''''''''''''''“l..''''' ''r.'''...,.,' .' '2'3.,± ''''..''.4q.''''.'41k*:.'A,:•,',,',4,:;,,,'r,4. ...', .'']','•''' ' :. ' '71r•■:, '',':,': Z.,' -1, ,*"4:,■:Z.V3:,....,'', :. 1. '',ii'Ut.':'+''''.•, q,f, :'':', ,,,,,i;,F4.,,' ,, ,*',i',1''.-t,''''.''''''.S. . ,' '',' ' ''''''',g,5,',', .. . . • . . , . . . . . . . „ _ . . . . ... . ... ... . . . ....... ........._ .. __....... .„. . .. ._ . . .,.. ,... . ...„..... ...,.. .... „ , . , .. „ . „. . .. . . . .. . . . . .: . . ... . . . . . .. . .. . . . . „ ...... ... „ ... .. ... L _. .._ . .. „.. , . . ........ . . . . ..... ... _ ._ . . . PARTITION PLAT NO .200 .._ , PRELIMIrlAr 'I,. RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 4----- ! ; P, rk, 1 #0.,....., _ . A REPLAT OF LOT 13, "HOOD VIEW", IN THE 'S.W. 1 /4 SECTION 11 , T.2S., R.1W., W.NA., CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON JUNE 14 2000 PLANNIN(....)- FILE NO. MLP 2000-000088 .--, 'DEET H L c,.....F ..e...- NARRATIVE: DECLARATION: ' SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE: APPROVALS. . ' CL ,i: ;h.•:-' .:.;' P V44'.' f',, r P AR'1 LT 1 ON ',,,,,O.:1, . I:3 I--' I '1:-S1-: PRESEJ":'IS 'I H---:\' RO?.:24'r R. TT4,."!4,1')B.Ci'4.'''...- 2s-,14I.2) „ lik[if: C,. nc.x.-,c,v A i.', ,t l, H E.,I F,'i'.II.Ii;`.; GER TIF Y T A l° ! H A 4I,I: C( RE C T I Y ,A,?;\P RC,VE D ,i-i S. ,")A 0121 ',„:r',Ir As Pi,j,=, THE_ -,Tia-.1I.;iLI 1 0' c..:3, r F OR T H :N kr i"-,'*, 4;,,,'S,:,,., ' ',.Afi.;:z F-R;": OF 1 Hr i AND RE PR r';:;,'{-I t'.1 IF,if) L)i‘-,,, ''',HE. AN rtt;E.ytEs.t; ,,,--5iti p tt,,,f,,t.,T Li-, ,E i n im A R KED Alt TH P R()?E'IR DI.,„ID4,,R Tr..„4-E N II- C A'..;;;i- C-:: F ;\10_, :-.) !,/,(,P..;,-: `;-)A:';'.r`C-,0; AR( I 0i-'7.4'.;C;PjBE.C, ,I'--i F HIE 4.4:-::, (),,if)AIN'11 N(..,‘ REPR II:5;,[k TE,D ,,,,T:t4,,i 'IA-ft tri T/"..",:::H-ST.) P AR.TI Ti ON M AP I_II-AID KA L P I,,,,,,,„-',01.)- G0()088 Fli'''• , ___ . II:, •;;;i:;::' ';' 'IC ')(.'.; B Y 1)III.:1.;',...';',R TH',II: ,:'',..iN NEI xf,,,,,,' AP T f3Ei N Ci, 1itl._7,-;C-i-;:',:'i B i,D A.:1--; 4'.',....)4.i..C.) ',...-i : '''' :741- TIGARD - DTY FII,IGINFTP. !I'2,J. ,I, 1:0"RI'IRTr 1.," I t\i,i-",1:' OII i L L P AP TI'ION ()I- (Sk;;;;; PROPF0R,TY AND TH A T . B,II,III,,-I I-3 OIL' Ei L'A R'.I N',;::::' A I\I D OE I q T F.I-:''5 :",,'E Of: S W. 1-',..-,,,,7.)T;--: ,4,"1. '-,,1,,,Yr [.''..il.'_iSIT,'D rkii It.i, t;:t L,F.,..'1 i I i 0,,4 P 1::,T 'T 0 BE PRECT'AP1-0 AND TH L' I,0 T 1 3, H.its.A.-yD ,itzvt", ft.-4 1-HE S.',41, I/4 fIll,i• SE C..Ti ON E it-00 N ID ..--",t);'Pt' -, it).itt.tt•-<.:-II',I:.r,. , ,' Si-i 0‘Ms-,I. IN ACCORD z•,7,i C.-EI 1,1,M,, CFI'!" ET;; TIGAR:'), W.AISHINGIR,TiN COI...IN-TY, OREGON, uoklumEki 1' z.,1' ".,:;.," /,r ;,;) ,....; P,I,•"*:N Y ';,;-' ‘.9.9 .4"! i.k r 25.0D 92 al ,,.-)RT.c,c-.1N Ri.,- ',ii -;n; BE!?--.40 r„.10-R,',--- p A 474;Tj CU L A Rt.,,,,,y DI::srf-,„'BF,1") AS Pa_LC)VII$ )t41 H-1;- ! (EDNL, f4.410r4N,,,ENT A I ,B ,;.,,,,,,:j,`4,C THE ,,7 4.-.T._ T,S. ,;,.-,-,!._.,;-:;,,-,.,\./}i:T.) 'i-- .--: 2:.l.)(JO Trii. P; -',' ,1:': HOI_I'D ,-,Le. 0INIThif.IJI A T I'F;E.. I NI II.4.; POIN I, SAID POO'',I'III BE IN(.; A IrOtj NI D 5/8 ,1i c H !Fi 0 N i-,),(,),D M ARK NC 0'-i D N.IN. CORNER OF Di ri 1.3, HO()) VEIN", f:',A I( ,C,I.' 0'19DG r THIENCE ON THE, NOR TH LINE Oc: SAID i„0-I 1 124..90 I -I ON 0;„;T'l T''',' `''''.,0 P T.lii Y OR ,40-'4': ,i'' ' Li- ',.:f:-...E:T To T H,,,-„-- N,I„E„ -.::„2„,„:1'4,NE R THF R Eclt',, AN D THE. Ii%E'.:-.;I RI(...;;H.'4 r.)1:. WAY DOe'Sid f' I„INF: OF SI.vIsi' I 0 C.,'TH A\JEN'si E (F.....I.,I INIG 2 00 -"Fr:T ',,V(II4S Tr Rt.Y (.)I7 • Ulf: Hi:,,„L.1 'l'''i'' 1...1C , "":!':i. 'VVF,::,H 'i l'i: r )U ND CE N'TERLNE); THENCE Etts:. GI.r.:)-:TOO" W ON THE E AS1 LINE ,r,..,-.)E ''''A.ID ..„4/,',)ilij;',4.1:cI\ '2":„.t. A l "Ti'''. "ILI II ,-IA i°1 I',I "C'. Ac7ree L(")r I 3 I 90.:?.0 r''II:.E."T TC) THE (...;,I. CI OR NE ItI., THEREOF; TklErqc„,E . w I :;;;4 ;59'34'2'2 'IN ICJ:4 Ti--!I SOU Pri 1,i N F, OF SA '1,1) E.C.15 1:5 100.0-I,' rcEE'r To A L...._ 1 A:);':'.,.'''.;, , AS 5'7.,E.S Sli-I,IL N 'c„--,„ ")," 0'," I ir R '4,4i-4 A c•,;;C;;-.S A L;;; P R.0 VII)E'E,': f . tt,,,, .) H L ;".,t Et, - :,,_.L r: :4--;E E ,r i,;,.. ,:',..-31:. f.,,,,,,,,,ii f.'N i i...;.i.ii F.-ou NI D p/er f -HE " Ii:f E44.)F. E..- 3'30'38" \4,1 ON TH Et. ',VEST 8'''.' 0.R.S. ';'-;:2.095 H A-tit': BE Et!.4 1--'A i D ttt S, C)It, _ , 2 00(,) Ivi-`..- t it A 1 ''c,,-;•. !:,..t');ft,,-,t ,,..,..,..“.., .,.....,,....T..,,• •, LI t'q E. OF I-3 AID i_0 I 13 I D3.24 EEL': TC AN 4N( E P()IN Tr, I-H LI:1'i CF._ IT'..,IRE.r.,TOR, :_':-; 415140N AND A 1 f,SHNG N T Y, OREGON OG*1....i'Cr.e.'.° .- CII.)N rft,i LIINC ON S AID 'NES T LI NIE 89 6,, EFF r 1,C,' 'it HIT . 6. WI, 1 i.; I Et i H F L D 't H i... ... I' r HE 1"t-,II..t.I.."„I.,i Till; 1-01,,.;Ni',.., 1)f--.1 K. '.;::' '44 A c7,:-.1".: S A;„E,,, r P A,C f ,;,,,,)1: L.A ND C-,ON T A rt:'5 22,473 f'-;•:)i,,AR E.. f:IT . T !E)E .,, . . .-.:;:,;;.,;;_.: (0i ;„,,;?! (.,,0-i ACKNO.-..'': - :::''..:DGEIAENT: cr,, .-..IT-, ,.--;,'. ,, ,..-:;.H'y,-.3-,-, .- --- 0 H E f--e,f I:I,t' C.0 tiR''.1 1 ‘,/ IH i.i..I It!i ft; i,A IctIIT: ;GIN RI: ,i-A is.,.)- R".F.C F.I vIiiI.2; f.? RE itt f 2P[:: ON T,-I: - :fi i2,Y ;01- GOO , : .. ,. ,L ," I , ,.)I C LOCK ___..M , A,.,'ID RE.,..,IIIXR f) D !N THE ....,OU ,L ___ yi, i'3 ti,t.up.ti.: E.0,,,, A N t.,)i At.t.,:;fy i tit:[I it_it:1; ti i AN t..) t tliii't pi. --,niprist, SAID S TATE AND C0i...„11'.4 TY, PERSON ALLY A RP E ARED R(X3E R L.ONGDERG ANEIt Kt.AR; N A S'..-:; W.,10 .6 E IN C't '2)1)1..v. SWIf..).R.N De ,3 to' Tti.--LA T THEY ' .. . . . .. .. . . . i Oi...IN TiC Ai._ 0 F.,R..,;40.NS .t1 A k.4 I 0 i.N -T-40: -;:ORL,C;CJING ,14;'..,.7T,),n f,,,,,,,,..!,,i ' . 114FTY [-KJ,C4 j firTT,.) SAID F*;.;'7,'i';-‘)u ME N ! ' REL.)/ t'-,,i‘i[' ,Y.:A_U;N',ARO.Y, . . ; . .„ ... .... ... . .. . ...... . ._. ... .. . , . _ :. , -;. 4 H'':, '- STATE Cif' OREGON it., cis 1 -• it;),„),,i,LE,t1t) tic" fs, 4'.PT.R !..-4:, ',,0TiNTY Or \NASH:NG-TON ) ' .... ,. 1 i Do HER.E„B• CER TIFY THAT THIS "'RACING IS A COPY CERTIFIED Ti',) E. BY THE SUR VE YOR OF THIS PARTITION PLAT. TO BE A TRUE AND iT.XACT CnP 4it OF 'THE,: ORIGIN AL, AND THAT IT WAS RECORDED ON THE ,,,,t____,..,.. DA tY itif- 1 . IN THE COUNT Y CLERK RECORDS. IL_L 0211-0.) _ ___ _ ___ Sl'''(u , ,. DEPUTY C(..)I.IN T Cit_ERK REGti:: NOTES PR.1".!.:-..:.SSiONAL ' LAND SURVEYOR , . . . t r, : - i-ft_ '-.:-::,. :1-N AL.c,'",,,, :,:,„; ,:';S '-3;-:T (, '., ,'2---_.:;:,' ,--,1.,. H; ','L.r;;-,':),.. ;.-. I- II' '.I' 1. I; 'C I 96 I„.. ''' 1 I , n , A f I 4,,i, - ' A A iii. 1.,../'t.L.,1,,,,I.,AWL .i_......:00,„..,,,.._.._,..,.::_„.,,,,,,:,_.„....: . _, ...:..„.::::..:-t4,0:;.:.:: JAY t) 1987 WADE G. DONOVAN M. 2271 . - A,, ,r., -1.--i ip.ou GI-4 DEcEimeER .31.. 2001 I HEREBY CERTIFY, THIS IS A TRUE AND EXACT COPY OF THE OR,..GINAL PARTITION PLAT I • PRELIMINARY sur,jEcT ,,,.....s. - , 1 it. CL !-,,, ; I t I ‘moi C:04. . . C l'..,,6:-:-'ri '1.c.:,.."r I 1 n E...- Concepts inc. 640 D D R i vE ;„;.1 ADSNf 'TO . OI.;;:,EON C.-I;027 • 50:5 652- 0188 F A. 003 600 r:,ik4 Ail_ vy.WW.C.C4EM AI; `4.1;04-tiE VANE T_C4.0k1 . .. . . DRAW 0 Y.MSC, CII.,rir OK cr D 0.1: INGDI I I ACC OU Is-,',7 4150 .P.P. \BND\i,..,OND.3859\L.0 ND P AR 7; . ... ...... _ ........ . ... _ _ .. , . .. ___ . ... . _ , . . .. . . . . . t. 1,,,,i) ,, _ ex,o,‘,.,,0 — — — — — ,,� , _ NO.2001 - U ----.An)- S.W. LADY MARION DRIVE � (NJ 1RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. _ d A REPLAT OF LOT 13, "HOOD VIEW", IN THE 0 I z S.W. 1/4 SECTION 11, T.2S., R.1 W., W.M., �- 88 I Q CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON FD 2-1/2 IR BRASS DISC IN o CONCRETE CURB STAMPED 0 "MARION DECEMBER 7, 2000 SCALE 1"=30' "CITY OF TIGARD SURVEY ,q ' CONTROL POINT" w I z PLANNING FILE NO. MLP 2000-00008 STATION DESIGNATION �° o GC 022-089 Ii)IN o U SHEET 1 OF 2 NORTHING 645064.669 `� .1.1.N kV EASTING 7615215.390 M, ((PUBLISHED STATE PLANE `c.)'n COORDINATES A` 25' I 20' NORTHING 645065.500819 I 3 0 \'` 0 EASTING 7615202.506610 m iv I • (MEASURED) o;° \ OJ Z 1 S 89'41'00" E GRID FACTOR 0.99990367 I In r \, -� \ 4J �,�• �. 1.81' ��, �� �� N s.w. SATTLER STREET � Q P• Q Q`� /j(EAST 1.82'(P2)) cn v� Q p. _ _ FD 2-1/2" BRASS DISC IN CONCRETE CURB STAMPED S 6 �0. (COUNTY ROAD NO. 857) "ORBITECH CONTROL POINT, `•S 6�4 ��C b •t\O• or GC 022-068 LS 2578, 1996" '� f 0p��1 ,,,,• �1 ,n tri PO NORTHING 644528.707 DESIGNATION GC 022-068 �4�6 8y. �'_ OO-��i'' :: 2 LEGEND. FASTING 7615175.869 O SET 5/8" x 30" IRON ROD W/ RED PLASC {PUBLISHED STATE PLANE ' COORDINATES \ INITIAL POINT ;-";. HELD FOR ONPDECEMBER"CENTERLINE 7 20 O CONCEPTS INC." (MEASURED COORDINATES) \ HELD FOR C,-E_> NORTH UNE GRID FACTOR 0.99990358 N.W. CORNER OF HELD BENT, TIED AT BASE • FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD W/ YELLOW PLASTIC 7 LOT 13, "HOOD VIEW" N 89.45'00" W 0.10' CAP SCRIBED "REPPETO LS 657" (S 89.45'00" E 125.0o'(P1)) V) FROM PARTITION PLAT NO. 1997-058 �` S 89'45'00" E 124.90 i Z a I • FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD �i� �.. 2). - FROM PLAT OF "HOOD VIEW" 9. .0 \ �'' _115.96"_(115.93'(P2)) w CO o A FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD W/ ALUMINUM CAP `� -� CO p SCRIBED "G & L PLS 1989" N 0 T FROM "MARION ESTATES", PLAT BOOK 86, I O O oo PAGES 31-33 8) " g Z FOU "v� P�C�,� 1 I cv �- � �,,,,( � ND»5/8 IRON ROD FROM HOOD VIEW", PLAT BOOK 23, PAGE 39 oo 000 AREA 10,070 S.F. 03 '�, d a X FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED CD w i co \q. w= N 4 ( ) = RECORD DISTANCES & BEARINGS �NO' o p I rn N W/ = WITH J�` 9°r�' P w W SN = SURVEY NUMBER 04Gg\0 o p O S 89'44'59" E 86.80' o I WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEY RECORDS o O li-; o P1 = PLAT OF "HOOD VIEW", PLAT BOOK 23, PAGE 39, °' WASHINGTON COUNTY PLAT RECORDS vZ o o l P2 = PARTITION PLAT NO. 1997-058, w d N > .x-5.00 0 o a) z < WASHINGTON COUNTY PLAT RECORDS S.F. = SQUARE FEET \ in ° 3 oo o I �___ .1).. 0 HES Z �\ z r C� '�� � r SCALE = 30' HELD 2 w.e S 89'44'59" E • o Q S 1" 3 ;0,. , 32.22' r cot Sot PARCEL 2 3 - " N I • r_6.0O, AREA 12,403 S.F. o 0 r w �O• c \ o '� 0 w� io 0 09 -z0./'o sP;1.00 \ 0 SIGNED ON: ) •'a r -Pt N 4:-. I REGISTERED � PROFESSIONAL CI! LAND SURVEYOR I CI AseMENT 12-30-1965) \--k_ ___I . o'ii piS BOO p AGE 655 �y 0 582, 1)00■0■LG%��NI1N1/�l„ N BOOK N 8914'22" w 100.07' w o (N 89.45'00" W 100.00'(P1)),_____, OREGON 5 z ', » "g" ) W WADE G. DONOVAN IlJ z c�_G_� CI o HELD `HELD I •0 0 2276 I 0 x N VALID THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2001 0 ,(4). co I X § 0.‘• .� 0 O �� Oi Ik o� co • 10 — 25' 25' I 25' 25' o I P Centerline Concepts Inc. o0 r 0 640 82ND DRIVE GLADSTONE, OREGON 97027 503 650-0188 FAX 503 650-0189 BENT -�� EMAIL WWW.CCIEMAIL®I-IEVANET.COM DRAWN BY:MSG CHECKED BY:WGDIII ACCOUNT #150-3859 M:\BND\LOND3859\LONDPART PARTITION PLAT NO .2001 - RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. A REPLAT OF LOT 13, "HOOD VIEW", IN THE S.W. 1/4 SECTION 11, T.2S., R.1W., W.M., CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON DECEMBER 7, 2000 PLANNING FILE NO. MLP 2000-00008 SHEET 2 OF 2 NARRATIVE: DECLARATION: SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: APPROVALS: 1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO PARTITION LOT i.KNOW ALL PEOPLE BY THESE PRESENTS THAT ROGER LONDBERG AND I, WADE G. DONOVAN III, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CORRECTLY APPROVED THIS ___L_DAY OF `��� `� _� `' 2001 13, "HOOD VIEW" AS PER THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN KARI NASS, THE OWNERS OF THE LAND REPRESENTED ON THE ANNEXED SURVEYED AND MARKED WITH PROPER MONUMENTS, THE LAND T CITY ' 11GARD PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE FILE NO. MAP, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE ACCOMPANYING REPRESENTED ON THE ATTACHED PARTITION MAP, SAID LAND 0 ,,,_.. p. al...1,.....„ lrtLLP 2000-000088. DO HEREBY DECLARE THE ANNEXED MAP TO BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BY: SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE, CITY 0 11GARD -- CITY ENGINEER 2. BASIS OF BEARINGS AND CENTERLINE OF S.W. 100TH BE A CORRECT MAP OF THE PARTITION OF SAID PROPERTY AND THAT AVENUE: I HELD THE UNE BETWEEN THE FOUND WE HAVE CAUSED THIS PARTITION PLAT TO BE PREPARED AND THE LOT 13, "HOOD VIEW", IN THE S.W. 1/4 OF SECTION 11, T.2S., R.1W., MONUMENT AT "A" AND A POINT S 89'41'00" E 25.00 PROPERTY PARTITIONED AS SHOWN IN ACCORDANCE W.M., CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, FEET FROM THE FOUND MONUMENT AT "B", TAKING THE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 92 OF OREGON REVISED BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: STATUTES. APPROVED THIS AY OF 2001 BEARING FROM THE PLAT OF "HOOD VIEW". .S BEGINNING AT THE INITIAL POINT, SAID POINT BEING A FOUND 5/8 INCH IRON ROD MARKING THE N.W. CORNER OF LOT 13, "HOOD VIEW"; BY: 3. EAST LINE: I HELD THE BEARING OF N 0019'00" E THENCE S 89'45'00" E ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 13 124.90 FROM THE FOUND MONUMENT AT "8". FEET TO THE N.E. CORNER THEREOF, AND THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYOR 4. NORTH UNE: I HELD THE LINE BETWEEN THE FOUND UNE OF S.W. 100TH AVENUE (BEING 25.00 FEET WESTERLY OF CENTERLINE); THENCE S 0019'00" W ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID MONUMENTS AT "D", "E", AND "C". LOT 13 190.20 FEET TO THE S.E. CORNER THEREOF; THENCE • N 89'34'22" W ON THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID LOT 13 100.07 FEET TO ALL TAXES, FEE, ASSESSMENTS OR OTHER CHARGES AS PROVIDED 5. SOUTH UNE: I HELD THE LINE BETWEEN THE FOUND • AL. dr/A ill Ai r 4_L: THE S.W. CORNER THEREOF; THENCE N 13'30'38" W ON THE WEST BY O.R.S. 92.095 HAVE BEEN PAID AS OF , 2001. MONUMENTS AT "G" AND B . R•G 'i LONDBERG 40 UNE OF SAID LOT 13 103.24 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION 6. WEST LINE: I HELD THE LINES BETWEEN THE FOUND N 0013'02" E CONTINUING ON SAID WEST UNE 89.61 FEET TO THE WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON MONUMENTS AT "D", AND "F", AND "G". • /,„ iNITTAL POINT. BY: K• 'I NASS SAID TRACT OF LAND CONTAINS 22,473 SQUARE FEET. DEPUTY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: COUNTY OF WASHINGTON 3 SS STATE OF OREGON SS COUNTY OF CLACKAMAS I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PARTITION PLAT WAS RECEIVED FOR RECORD ON THIS DAY OF , 2001, KW W ALL PEOPLE BY THESE PRESENTS, ON THIS 5 'DAY OF AT _O'CLOCK _._.M., AND RECORDED IN THE COUNTY CLERK 3&MU(kr , 2001, BEFORE ME A NOTARY PUBUC IN AND FOR RECORDS. SAID STATE AND COUNTY, PERSONALLY APPEARED ROGER LONGBERG AND KARI NASS, WHO BEING DULY SWORN, DID SAY THAT THEY ARE THE BY: IDENTICAL PERSONS NAMED IN THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND THAT DEPUTY COUNTY CLERK THEY ACKNOWLEDGE THEY EXECUTED SAID INSTRUMENT FREELY AND VOLUNTARILY. , ■ i���1) A Joc `d NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF OREGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: VYI _B,2I I 47/ OFFICIAL SEAL, MISTI ARRAN NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON x'� COMMISSION NO.3 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAR.14,2004 SIGNED ON: 1 —05 -0 1 REGISTERED NOTES PROFESSIONAL 1. THIS PLAT SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF CITY OF LAND SURVEY 11GARD PLANNING FILE MLP 2000-00008. 2. THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO THE COVENANTS, tJj(%jLGI o*Amint, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AS SET FORTH IN DEED BOOK 568, PAGES 441-445, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 10, 1965, E AS AMENDED IN DEED BOOK 628, PAGES 275-277, OREGON 1987 WASHINGTON COUNTY RECORDS. WADE G. DONOVAN IlE 2276 VALID THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2001 III Centerline Concepts Inc. 640 82ND DRIVE GLADSTONE, OREGON 97027 503 650-0188 FAX 503 650-0189 EMAIL WWW.CCIEMAILCI-HEVANET.COM DRAWN BY:MSG CHECKED BY:WGDIII ACCOUNT #150-3859 M:\BND\LOND3859\LONDPART cri•-xe--' FAX TRANSMITTAL 4110 Off -I1 Date December 13, 2000 Number of pages including cover sheet 1 To: Gilbert From: Brian Rager Co: WACO Surveyor's Office Co: City of Tigard Fax#: (503) 846-2909 Fax#: (503) 624-0752 Ph #: 639-4171, Ext. 318 SUBJECT: MLP 2000-00008, Londberg Partition MESSAGE: I thought that I had done this previously, but could not find evidence that I did. We are finished with our review of the plat and are OK with you performing your review. I believe you may have already started, which is fine. • Thanks. I:\ENGTAX.DOT HP OfficeJet Fax History Report for Personal Printer/Fax/Copier/Scanner Engineering 624 0752 Dec 13 2000 3:37pm Last Fax Date Time Type Identification Duration Pages Result Dec 13 3:36pm Sent 5038462909 0:27 1 OK Result: OK - black and white fax OK color - color fax • qck 111 � � Centerline Concepts, 1 c LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: eA Date:\\\c-\ V Attn: Re: -g Job: l SoRtf41 V 12 2.000 We are sending you the following: YMENt Prints _ Plans c,0110% DEVE1.0 Mylars _ Legal Descriptions Other _ Specifications Via: Messenger Mail Other Number I Description P -. Pia A .,,,{ • For Your Information As Requested For Approval Returned for Corrections Other - For your signature Note: pL Q cix-?Q1\ k--k_uvo , From: Centerline Concepts, Inc. Precise Boundary Surveys 640 82nd Drive Gladstone,Oregon 97027 503 650-0188 fax 503 650-0189 NOU-20— 0100 8b:40 FIDELITY WS .4I Fidelity National Title Company of Oregon C�1;" 10200 SW Graonburg Road #340 • Portland, OR 97223 (503) 077-3685 • FAX 15031 977-9084 PRELIMINARY REPORT ESCROW OFFICER: Lisa Fredinburg ORDER NO.: 12-129696-2B- B TITLE OFFICER: Mihyun Steinberg Amended TO: Roger Londberg 15215 SW 100th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 • • OWNER/SELLER: Roger Londberg and Kari Nass BUYER/BORROWER: Carrie M. Taylor PROPERTY ADDRESS: 15215 SW 100th Avenue, Tigard, OR 97223 EFFECTIVE DATE: November 14, 2000, 05:00 P.M. 1 . The policy and endorsements to be issued and the related charges are: AMOUNT PREMIUM, Owner's Standard 149,000.00 469.00 Lender's Extended 147,000.00 222.00 Government Service Charge 35.00 100, 116, 8.1 Endorsement's) 50.00 2. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: A Fee 3. TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: Roger Londberg and Kari Ness, as tenants in common 4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS REPORT IS SITUATED, IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, IN THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF OREGON, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: SEE EXHIBIT "ONE" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF PKR\Mihyun 11/19/2000 Post-Ir Fax Note 7671 Dom" PA,* V.., From . .",' 4) --k-8 . Phone h Phone p Fvcr (e)SU._R�`�� Fax If �J ` 1 Nf]V-20-2000 06 40 FIDELITY WS P.02/05 Order No. 12-129696-28 EXHIBIT "ONE" Lot 13, Hood View, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. Beginning at the EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING: Northeast corner of said Lot 13, thence along the East line thereof S 00 19 00 W 67.0 feet;45 W thence N 89 45 00 W 87.0 feet; th thence 0along said West I ne the fol ow n9 OtW 32.25 feet to the West line of said Lot 13; courses: N 13 43 25 W 23.70 feet 9n45 00 E19 500 feet Oto feet thetpoint of beginning. North said Lot 13; thence along said North line S • 2 • • NOV-20-2000 06:40 FIDELITY WS 11/1bizuuu �,.�� __ •• P.03/05 Order No. 12-129696-28 AS OF THE DATE OF THIS REPORT, ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED AND EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS IN THE POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records, proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession, 3. Easements, or claims of easements or encumbrances, not shown by the public records. reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof, water rights, claims or title to water. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose. 5. Any statutory liens for labor or material, including liens for contributions due to the State • of Oregon for unemployment compensation and for worker's compensation, which have now gained or may gain priority over the lien of the insured deed of trust, which liens do not now appear of record. SPECIFIC ITEMS AND EXCEPTIONS: 6. Property taxes, and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 2000-2001. Amount: $1,312.00 Unpaid Balance: $1,312.00 plus interest, if any Account No.: R504261 Map No.: 2S111CB-01714 . Levy Code: 023.74 7, City liens in favor of the City of Tigard, if any, There are no liens as of November 14, 2000. 8. Restrictive covenants to Waive Remonstrance, including the terms and provisions thereof. For: Underground utilities Recorded: September 8, 1965, Book 568, Page 33 Reference is made to said document for full particulars. 3 • NOV-20-2000 06:41 11/11$/4Uvv FIDELITY WS ��•... P.04/05 Order No. 12-129696-2B 9. Covenants, conditions and restrictions (deleting therefrom any restrictions indicating any preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color. religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin) as set forth in the document Recorded: September 10, 1965, Book 568, Page 441 Said document has been amended by instrument Recorded: January 24, 1967, Book 628, Page 275 Said document has been amended by instrument Recorded: January 24, 1967, Book 628, Page 277 10. Easements) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as granted in a document. Granted to: Portland General Electric Company, an Oregon corporation Purpose: Distribution line Recorded: December 30, 1965, Book 582, Page 655 Affects: Along all side and rear lot lines, 5 feet in width and around the perimeter of Hood View Subdivision, 10 feet in width 11. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, and any other obligations secured thereby Amount: $135,000.00 Dated: January 19, 2000 Grantor: Roger Londberg and Kari Ness Trustee: Pacific Northwest Title of Oregon, Inc. Beneficiary: Dianne L. Sherman, as Trustee of the Dianne L. Sherman 1997 Living Trust UTA 2/17/97, and Mary Sherman, with rights of survivorship Recorded: January 24, 2000, Recorder's No. 2000005226 12. Subject to Recording the Partition Plat and any limitations or exceptions shown thereon. • 13. A court order for installment payments of spousal and/or child support, to be made by: Debtor: Roger Alan Londberg Creditor: Leah Gaye Londberg nka Di Mao County: Washington Court: Circuit Case No.: C981031 DR Amount: S748.00 per month child support S200.00 per month spousal support Docket Date: January 6, 1999 • The following matters pertain to Extended coverage only 14. Any facts, rights.interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession. To remove this item, we will require an affidavit and indemnity on a form supplied by the - - - company. - • 4 NOV-20-2000 06 41 FIDELITY us Order No. 12.129696.26 15. Any statutory liens for labor or material, including liens for contributions due to the State of Oregon for unemployment compensation and for worker's compensation, which have now gained or may gain priority over the lien of the insured deed of trust, which liens do not now appear of record. To remove this item, we will require an affidavit and indemnity on a form supplied by the company. END OF ITEMS AND EXCEPTIONS NOTES: Note A. (Intentionally deleted) Note B. There are no judgments of record against Kari Ness or Carrie M. Taylor, Note C. The address of said land is known as 15215 SW 100th Avenue, Tigard, OR 97223. Note D. The County of Washington imposes a transfer tax of S1.00 per thousand, based on the full value of the property, at the time a Deed or other transfer is recorded, unless exempted. Note E. No search has been made or will be made for water, sewer, or storm drainage charges unless the city/service district claims them as liens (i.e., forecloseable) and reflects them on its lien docket at the date of closing. Buyers should check with the appropriate city bureau or water/service district and obtain a billing cutoff. Such charges must be adjusted outside of escrow. • • • 5 TOTAL P.05 LAND PARTITION APPLICATION - 40 • Alk13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 CRY OF TIGARD • GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: DATE OF PRE-APP.: Property Address/Location(s): 16 21 su3 (O dt 111-vQs FOR STAFF USE ONLY .:.. Tax Map 8 Tax Lot#(s): 2-5— ItA1 I Case No.(s): Site Size: IS Z 1A-� •QS Other Case No.(s): • Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)': V-410 e+('I xvtd b-e Receipt No. I Address: 15 2i 5 - 10 Q 4 I<, Phone:(WO �'10 Appliication• City: `fib ■ =1 t Zip: r7-Z-2-.9 Date: ppenV d lknA-t Yt S 1 �G Dat e Dete min Address: PO .o z - ' o° Complete'.•:��>.� Phone. 712- City: Ocher mats t o� Zip: ci70 Comp Plan/Zone Designation: •When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant CIT Area: must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written ? authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written Recording Date and Number ' authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. - tom.5/2 tio.reinUnestersgendpectelac PROPOSAL SUMMARY • The owners of record of the subject property request permission to allow a Land Partition to: divide = 5 Z- �c rt REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS s into —I—LJ (total area) (#of parcels) • containing 10 k O4( . and VZ( `-t Z1 1 Application Elements Submitted: (sq. ft or acres) (sq. ft or acres) Application Form ' Owner's SignatureNVritten Authorization (provide any additional information here) Q�Title Transfer Instrument or Deed Qi Site/Plot Plan (#of copies based on pre-app check list) E'Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/:"x 11') 9-"Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) Er Filing Fee $780.00 1 • List any VARIANCE OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: - • APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements"box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: :�. . • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject Att2tS71, - ..... • If the application is granted,the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval ...__. __..- -- -- ...._._ .. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that ... : . any such statements are false. . . _ • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this. �9 day of j2.-/y f k iL /* • er' Signature Owner's Signature Own is Signature Owner's Signature 2 • • • Customer Receipt CITY OF TIGARD Printed:07/25/2000 16:03 User:kristie Station: 02 Operator: KJP Rcpt No: 0003975 Date: 07/25/2000 Customer No:000000 Amount Due: 780.00 Name: ROGER LONDBERG Cash: 0.00 Address: 4618 FOX LANE S Check: 780.00 SALEM, OR 97306 N/A 0.00 Change: 0.00 Type Description Amount LANDUS Land Use Applications 780.00 937 11/44,Le _oP • • August 15, 2000 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Roger Londbergq 15215 SW 100 Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 RE: Notice of Complete Application Submittal — MLP2000-00008 Dear Mr. Londberg: The City has reviewed your submittal material and finds that your application is complete. Staff will now review your application for Land Partition Approval. A decision will be rendered within 5-6 weeks. I am available to answer questions and otherwise assist you as may be required at 639-4171, extension 317. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. If I am not available, please leave your name and phone number so I can call you as soon as possible. Sincerely, ' 41 Mathew Scheidegger Assistant Planner i:\curpin\mathew\mlp\mlp2000-00008.acc c: MLP2000-00008 Land use file Ken Sandblast Land Solutions, Inc. PO Box 38 Clackamas, OR 97015 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 Sent by: CHICAGO TITLE 5036537853; 07/18/00 3:29PM;J ##566;Page 2/3 • • • 0 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 10001 SE Sunnyside Road Clackamas,OR 97015 Phone(503)786-3940 Fax(503) 653.7833 =METROSCAN PROPERTY PROFILE= Washington (OR) • OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Reference Parcel# : 2S111C3 01714 Parcel Number :R0504261 RTSQ: 01W-02S -11 -SW Owner - ; Longberg Roger,Nass Kari CnOwner Site Address : 15215 SW 100Th Ave Portland 97224 Mall Addrea : 15215 SW 100Th Ave Portland Or 97224 Telephone : Owner: Tenant. SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION Transferred :01/24/2000 Loan Amount : $135,000 Document ti : 5225 Lender : Seller Sale Price :$145,000 Loan Type : Seller Deed Type :Warranty Interest Rate : Fixed %Owned : 100 Vesting Type . ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION Market Land :$71,060 Exempt Amount : • Market Structure :$57,890 Exempt Type Market Other %Improved :45 Market Total : $128,930 Levy Code : 02374 99.06 Taxes : 51,192.00 Millage Rate : 14.0599 Assessed Total :$84,780 School Dist :Tigard PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Map Grid ; 655 D7 Class Code :R13 Census ; Tract 308.02 Block. 1 NbrhdCd : ETIG MillRate Sub/Plat : Hoodvicw Land Use : 1012 Res,Improved Legal : HOODVIEW,LOT 13,ACRES.52 PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS Bedrooms :2 Lot Acres :.52 Year Built : 1925 Bathrooms : 1.00 Lot SgFt :22,651 .,fYearlilt : 1925 Heat Method:Forced IlstnFin SF : Floor Cover : Carpet Pool BstnUnftnSF: Foundation :Concrete Ftg Appliances : BstrLowSF : Roof Shape : Dishwasher : BldgSeFt : 1,616 Roof Mall :Conip Shingle Hood Fan . 1strIrSglri : 1,136 intertorMat :Plaster Deck U q erF1SF : Paving Mat! : Ganaga Type:Detached Porch SeFt : Const Type . :Wd Stud\Shtg Garage SF :480 Attic Set :480 . Ext Finish :245 Deck SgFt The Information Provided Is Doomed Reliable,Bat is No:Guam:01raa. Sent by: CHICAGO TITLE 5036537853; 07/18/00 3:30141;jgeFm #i586;Page 3/3 • • • 74410 ZIP?me 110.136: this Order No.00.Mtn STATE 0P OREGON 111111 SAO •lissom Na 00110275 County d Wastit qta • 0 r Akrit maoaRammaa I. Jan/ ..1 .` _�of Aasata- LeatlStrss Oak f o Cow •� ►rl sW iootit Ate T�` .'°rk :`• 'Asgard OR 97224 ta .� IM`I ,.. ��11 I toga I dodo Iim MWItuasadwdtttttntitsabtlr /.y •••.14444, y`,l �.. Loam; fiilrl witi.b.= .)]] t''.i• AO noted 4V o `' Dot: t 2000005225 Re04: 247491 167.00 01/16/2000 09x12;2Ssa STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED • Muy Slums sad Diaaea L Sherman,G2amo1,comps end irtasls b Rego Lmlaorg and Krtri Nan, &Woo,the SolovIi dastise4 ttatl puvprrty Goo oP araaabaetcca,nap m sc o.Uy at Posh hatch a7a ted is Weahirploa Chop',x.14 Wit: • Ut 11,HOOD VIM,Ist I6s City of Ttprd.Cet y of Wuhtaptea tats VW of Chwoh smog that pen b ■**tt.potdk wys,If say. 'fida imp*ia floe Root arcarobasaoaa,EXCEPT: Ito Navin OcoostIod azmiIca aro aitdtn Os boun4.4os of oma eabioot to t1w ttatesoxy a oostoo t , of the Uttitled 6vwc a9c Apollo); Rottttiolito COvcre rat to Waive Hr oon.Uaaco fax vodcrmosid wi:iag Beak 561 of 79;Ovtpaans.Candid=sad Paadotioos Zook 5611 pap 441.amcotlod Hoot 628 paps 272,asoaaded Book 628 pass 277. TICS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OP TIC PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN TH S m smi.iMBNTr' Di VIOLATION OP APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE BIONDI°OR ACG7EMPIG THIS fir, TISa PERM ADMIRING PRE TITLE Ti.s TO MI PROPERTY SIOUX CHBCtc WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR CtNNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUIT'S AGAINST PAI MIND OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED CRS 30911(1. The C midm Moo for this o ovoys we is$146,0011.0, (}Lot tartply pith the requiraanoata of ORS 93.050) Cos tai this Jaauari 19 2000. n Dianna L.BShr ti S MAiIY 1 I a7_. HER ATTORNEY IN FACT . "`G `f STATE OP OREGON • county of Muhtaont*h $° Ctt this Jaaoasy 19,2000,Was no,the undeakgnad,personalty sppwtd du within mooed Mary Dermal bows to:no to bo the idondal individasi s good u hmadf sad as Power of Atte:o fns •' . Mary Stomas who essooted the within lost/ ad sad aokaowtodood to me t st - :of Rio .t •40646,11.., • • r OFPICIALBWAL LAS f°.. . • Raft Statao *mmadsadoa expires: df16AN • 110•,- wts9Nnva, cowom �u ',Rogow, N'atAY/[A TA, �� 1 .00 01' —1x7 3-e..• PR 0018 Deg • wawa • 97/17/2000 16:54 573-553-9093 IMPASS ENGINEERING PAGE 02 , • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION JOB NO. 4757 A PORTION OF LOT 13 07/17/00 MR "HOOD VIEW" TAX LOT 1714 (MAP 15-1W-11CB FOR: KEN SANDBLAST EXHIBIT A A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 11, T.2 S., R.1 W.,W.M. WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON, BEING A PORTION OF LOT 13 "HOOD VIEW' A SUBDIVISION PLAT OF RECORD IN WASHINGTON COUNTY, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 13"HOOD VIEW'; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE THEREOF, BEING THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 100T"AVENUE (50.00 WIDE), S 00°19'00"W, 67.00 FEET; THENCE N 89°45'00"W, 87.00 FEET; THENCE S 00°19'00"W,46.00 FEET; THENCE N 89°45'00'1W, 32.25 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 13; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE THE FOLLOWING TWO (2)COURSES: N 13°43'25"W, 23.70 FEET; THENCE N 00°19'00" E, 90.00 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 13; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE S 89°45'00" E, 125.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 10057 SQUARE FEET. • 07/25/00 12:47 FAX 503 640 3525 UNIFIED SEWERAGE 4 002 -- • • File Number 39 J 7 Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County Jurisdiction 116540Z Date 7 .O —OO Map & Tax Lot 25j 1 l C.43 I� 4 Owner r ?1455 Site Address 17 25 g W &O TI c 4 ED, '12Z # Contact s 4 yet,,. Proposed Activity M L. p sm. S r (2 Address 1 5215 5 I DQ-ei. Phone GO 3 - 75ton AA - 94.9. - s-1cil ';77 ..5 ' U., LOW,n 4/.4j)".A- Y N NA Y N NA USA Composite Map Stormwaterifrastructure maps ❑ ❑ ❑ Map # ❑ � ❑ QS # �1- / ❑ ❑ ❑ Locally adopted studies or maps El Cl ❑ Other Specify Specify Based on a review of the above information and the requirements of USA Design and Construction Standards Resolution and Order 00-7: 0 Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200' of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER OR STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties, a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200' of the site.This pre- screening site assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. NO FURTHER SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED.THIS FORM WILL SERVE AS AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE A STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. ❑ • The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development. NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. Comments: Reviewed By: Date: 7/Z 516 Returned to Applicant Mail Fax Counter__ Date 1/2 s J 0 O By_72C, • • SW 100TH AVENUE LAND PARTITION APPLICATION NARRATIVE I • • SW 100TH AVENUE LAND PARTITION APPLICATION NARRATIVE OWNER/APPLICANT: Mr. Roger Londberg Ms. Kari Nass 15215 SW 100th Avenue Tigard, OR. 97224 APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: Mr. Ken Sandblast Land Solutions, Inc. Clackamas, OR. 97015 Tel: 722-8585 Fax: 722-8555 LOCATION: 15215 SW 100th Avenue, West side of SW 100th Avenue, South of Lady Marion Drive. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Assessor's Map 2S-1 W-11 CB Tax Lot 1714 SITE AREA: 0.52 Acres ZONING: R-3.5 • APPROVAL CRITERIA: Development Code for the City of Tigard, Title 18 APPLICANT'S REQUESTED APPROVAL: Preliminary Plat approval for the creation of a two (2) lot partition. This report will address the applicable standards and review criteria of the City of Tigard's Development Code and Comprehensive Plan. • TABLE OF CONTENTS Page City of Tigard Applicable Policies and Findings 1-6 Supplemental Maps, Illustrations and Exhibits Size Site Vicinity Map 8.5" x 11" Washington County Tax Assessor Map of Site 8.5" x 11" Exhibit A - Preliminary Plat • 8.5" X 11" (i) • • FINDINGS This application involves partitioning the subject site into a total of two (2) lots from the existing 0.52 acres of Tax Lot 1714 of Tax Assessor's Map T2S-R1 W-11 CB, one of which will contain an existing single family residence located on the subject site. The subject site is relatively flat in slope (0-10%). All of the lots being created exceed the minimum 10,000 square foot lot size of the R-3.5 zoning district. These lots will be served via frontage on S.W. 100th Avenue. The following chapters and sections of the City of Tigard Development Code are applicable to this preliminary partition plat application based upon: (i) existing conditions present upon and surrounding the subject site, (ii) requirements conveyed by Tigard staff during the pre- application meeting held for this project, (iii) a review of Title 18: Chapter 18.390. DECISION-MAKING PROCEEDURES 18.390.40. Type II Prceedure A. Pre-application Conference. A pre-application conference is required for Type II actions. Pre-application conference requirements and procedures are set forth in section 18.390.080C. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: A pre-application conference was held on May 4, 2000 with a City of Tigard Planning Division staff person. B. Application requirements. 1. Application Forms. Type ll applications shall be made on forms provided by the Director as provided by Section 18.390.080 El; 2. Submittal Information. The applicant shall: a. Include the information requested on the application form; b. Addreess the relevant criteria in sufficient detail for review and action; c. Be accompanied by the required fee; d. Include two sets of .pre-stamped and pre-addressed envelopes for all property owners of record as specified in Section 18.390.040C. The records of the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation are the official records for determining ownership. The applicant shall demonstrate that the most current assessment records have been used to produce this notice list; e. Include an impact study. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at . large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirements, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion Roger Londberg— Two Lot Partition Land Solutions, Inc. City of Tigard Preliminary Subdivision Plat Application Page 1 • • that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: As part of the submittal information, an application including the information requested has been provided; the narrative herein below addresses the relevant criteria for review and action; a fee of $780.00 is provided; the mailing materials have been provide by the City of Tigard and submitted as part of this package; and an Impact Study. Chapter 18.420. LAND PARTITIONS 18.420.050 Approval Criteria A. Approval criteria. A request to partition land shall meet all of the following criteria: 1. The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: As.addressed by this narrative, the subject site complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations applicable to a two lot partition application. 2. There are adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal; APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: As proposed, there are adequate public facilities available to serve the subject site. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to the subject site along SW 100th Avenue which the applicant will pay a fee in-lieu of placing underground. An eight inch sanitary sewer line is located within SW 100th Avenue from which the applicant will extend one new lateral to proposed Lot 1. A.six inch water line exists within SW 100th Avenue which is adequate to service one new parcel being created via a water meter service lateral. 3. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards; and APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: A drainage plan is depicted on the preliminary site plan submitted with this application. In regard to storm water quality, a fee in-lieu shall be assessed to the applicant of $210.00 for every 2,640 square feet of impervious surface created on the subject site. The applicant shall opt to waiver frontage improvements. 4. All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below: a. The minimum width of the building enve lope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: As proposed, both lots being created through this two lot partition exceed the minimum width required through R3.5 zoning. b. The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: As proposed, both lots being created through this two lot partition exceed the minimum lot size required by R3.5 zoning. There are no flag lots proposed through this application. c. Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15-foot wide access easement. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: Roger Londberg- Two Lot Partition Land Solutions, Inc. City of Tigard Preliminary Subdivision Plat Application Page 2 • • As proposed, both lots being created through this two lot partition exceed the minimum 15 foot frontage on SW 100th Avenue. d. Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: As proposed, both lots being created through this two lot partition meet or exceed the minimum setbacks required through R3.5 zoning. e. When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: As proposed, neither of the two lots being created through this two lot partition are flag lots. Therefore, the provisions of this section are not applicable. f. A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: As proposed, there will be no accessways within 10 feet of an abutting lot. Therefore, the provisions of this section are not applicable. g. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: As proposed, no accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities, Therefore the provisions of this section are not applicable. h. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: As proposed, no common drive is to be provided through this two lot partition. Therefore, the provisions of this section are not applicable. 5. Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress, and Circulation. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: As proposed, the accessways comply with the minimum of one driveway with 15 foot access and 10 feet of pavement. 6. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle Roger Londberg- Two Lot Partition Land Solutions, Inc. City of Tigard Preliminary Subdivision Plat Application Page 3 • • pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: The subject site is not within the one-hundred-year flood plain. Therefore, the provisions of this section are not applicable. 18.420.060 Final Plat Submission Requirements APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: The provisions of this section will be satisfied during the City of Tigard final plat review and approval process. 18.420.070 City Acceptance of Dedicated Land APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: The provisions of this section will be satisfied during the City of Tigard final plat review and approval process. 18.420.080 Recording Partition Plats APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: The provisions of this section will be satisfied during the City of Tigard final plat review and approval process. Chapter 18.510. RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS 18.510.020(C). R-3.5: Low Density Residential District. . APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: As proposed, this two lot partition will accomodate an additional detached single-family home upon the subject site with both lots being created having at least 10,000 square feet each. Therefore meeting the provisions of this section. 18.510.030(A). Types of Uses. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: As proposed, the intent for this two lot partition is for the future construction of a detached single-family house upon the additional lot being created. Detached household living is an outright permitted use within the R-3.5 zoning district. 18.510.040(B). Minimum and Maximum Densities APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: Using the computations refered to in Chapter 18.715, the minimum density for the subject site is 1.8 units and the maximum density for the subject site is 2.25 units. This application is proposing 2 detached single-family units including the existing unit. 18.510.050(A). Development Standards. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: Both of the lots proposed through this two lot partition application fulfill the requirements of the R-3.5 zoning district. Both lots have an area exceeding 10,000 square feet with widths exceeding 65 feet and depths exceeding 90 feet. The existing house will maintain minimum setbacks and does not exceed the maximum height of 30 feet. Roger Londberg— Two Lot Partition Land Solutions, Inc. City of Tigard Preliminary Subdivision Plat Application Page 4 1 ,`10e'tetoolg ' D f.... .... .........401 e. 11., : ..1 :1,) .......I'.....1.. .........1. . . . . ... ..".........••• i.: .. 1................... .. •.............1.1.. •:.• ...d..'''......1 11 1'..1 ...... .....•"....... . • 1 ' •.. '' I ". fe„.3—I :::..• . I':•...•" •• . : . •. - • , •. • ' :U......... .. •::. .. ..:. . .....•:....:;•.:•:.... '.;•.!.•:•:;.1:.*:••••• ,::: .' ••••••• ,.. - — *\- \.,. ::1::::::::•:i.-.0 • ....I.:U. :- U .......... • _.:SIO1U.............I N E".7..,-'.U.:•.11 • ...t . . . . .. . . .... . . . .. . j s • . • .. : •. s-SW SW , • • • • .....:,•: .s. • EitAIVGLE., •• :; 4 .-...,•••••-...4 .. • . .,....n.--7`,..' :.''.:1---.:•::.:•Sitt.-•: :I -...I. !..':.Y:::.:,:: , , . 1/, —; , • • • . . •• EA( • •.... ' . "... - , :.:. .«.": . . , • 11 /it:T.'..; • CT • ..... . . .. .. • • • : . • ....„..:: -- :. • • .-.i• MUI.::.I 7..:•—•;!:*--:,-;:-.74. • ...":'•"; - :: . . ••••...... .. ::C41 ...,„„ • • • • .;........ . •••,- -• . . . . • ••.:...1 • . ,--'0 ...... : '.: .,•,''., • „: . • I '0; (1• . ... • •• • ... .. • . . ......- • • >'• . j ,..... ,.■ ('''i P. ... ,. • . ,. , . •• . . . • ' • • • •.• •.• \'''''''....„...,...' ':r „'..''. • . ... . : ' ... ... :''' ':. •'i i ".': I ...••• • : . r. :•..° 4. III . ..• • . . .., 4...-, ..• .i:c.,..--:;:i4•*CT• • -;:.-:4:.......•••-••• . .---_-•:•.."-- --.......:.• .C:„. ..• ••••• • :: . -•-••• •• : : --------•-•••••••••• • - f: • . I• . ::: ........ .• •• • -.. ---• . -- ' :.: ....'• ".. i ... C. • :-.....?-..„...::—... ••.::•.-.c• i .........:-...- -- -..... • .;.......... i . : :: • ":. ,*-.•.,;, - - .„.• . „ .:..„ •„:„. •• • .. . ..„ :-.... • : . --••• ••••" • • • ••• ••. :.. ::-.• • ......... , „:•„:.. ,.....---..„•::2,•-::: 4--:......:::1.-.:.';;;.::':::...',..".t LL .••• ••.•:•,: .• !:.%•%::•!.:.:. .•L....'4'7 •••• *.'":. 1 g. :.•• : i Ca a • (..) . •• . ...,• . . . . ••• • • • • .. .i.!..--ri,rp 1,,,, : • :.. • ..., A .-..,........ ....,•; *:::•:::::::::,:.J.::. .., .::.::::::. : '--*•:-'-',.:*•*:*** .: .......,•-• • ::::.. .......7....! '.. !''' 1.)4s •••••••• ........... . - •.....'. ...'..'1 1(1.,ii.": .. . .••'..-T:. ..•-•-••••• ••• -: : .• •• • • •••........:•• •:•• .•..... . • : ... :.::: :. • . • A • • : - • ... •.:. .• • •... ..•....... .... .., •. _ • „,,,. .":„: :..........i.,„.„:„ •••••••••• . •••••4/,.--......, :,,,.....,:.:...:: ..:...:•:•••-• ...- -, • . . .. ..••...... . .. .. • . : • :• •••• . •• •• • . . • . : - :.. . - •-• ... • -• --. ASAii 1:11Al 71 /Lififtr' .i...• L... ..• . .. • : • : •• , . ......1FLOi:• • . :: .• . • --.... •.. . -.•• :••••-i-.--S i-.. . j:•:::;.....f : :. ....• • • ... . . . .. . . • • • . .. . .: • • • • ..•••, .. .... . •• -ce . ... iis ....e ?...t., ,...-.:'::.:1..!.......i.:::....'......'..,„,71t.11,9„, .4.1+'; . 1...t:.1 .....','• '-..... """ .„ ,, -..,,*--'2,:i•--•,-*:• . •-....-.. '' •- i.::''. • ...;: c.o., 7 ..--, •1'1'41\,I... ....*.`.. • n'T•; i!--.: ....:.-.•:, ,,-.:-.-. - . . . . '' :r-.1.;)..,... . - ••• - ;.. ...... .. :,. • ,..1,v. ... . A."---'-', ..*-'....• • • Sit:. . • . •. • :::, ,• • . • . :. . ..„..uu I)::::::-• ..- • -...t*,. :.•.• • ...,:e.,.....::: --•.: 5:---- •r-, •.1; i ...; '•:.•>1),:: . . . . :' • ..:.:C,..'„,,,'_„..- . . . r . ._ . . .. ‹P.' • .... . -.1 6•!....• '..•'• . '•LL4:,'...C.,) .......,.::. .... •-: ' •: •e.,... ••• . • . : .. • . •..:. . :., :•-• ' ...--4t . ...,'...-.---— . • ••• •.:...• • -..-. ,.. ....,:.: . —.•.• ... • ..:. .••••• • ... ; •', --....;',.=.-E. ..: 1.7:.•. s ::. . w.,:. • ... ... • . • ., .. . . .. : . •••••••••••.:.„:......S. .......). ..• SW.:"-... .",,,..... ... . •.‘• . :"...: .. .. : s. . . . ••,•••• - ..„.. •. . ..• s. . : • . .. . . „.. .. • .• • • • .• •..• .. . .• • :1 . - .. .." : .. . . . . . .: . .. •, • •. rf"'.--.-i•'& nuFM • I'• 'I'.'.. . .......'• . 1"-,'' '' •• ! -.-.".,'.....i. i', • . . , :... i e. : .. -:: -,,,..••••..........• ,........:-.......•......,:::,..;:::::::,:?....,........••.....„.::::. .....:::::::,,,...:::::::::::...,,, ...:„.:::-,..:::....i...:,......• ,:::::.: .:.:' / :::...:.• •.-v x :•-•!..-i ...:...T,----7777.-.- . „. • . • .. - "" • • 1. woe R +1 . ... .., . .• ,... ,4. . . . I 1 • •%./it:.: .),...I.P... •. .11.1.:..... '...• ... .... .. . .• .. . • . I I ..• . . ..•• . • •.•.. 11111111111d1WW1 :. . • ..• SW • I -''''-,....-] • Tt'V '' ti-) (-) . • • • r i .1"1-1 A\ cc -••••••••-••-„1,.•••••)••:-..),.......i ••r11(...:1•11;•.1,....... i.....-cc.•••,..,•••: t‘...1.-.•••;.......„ t....• t.:::: , . 1. , Jun-21 0 .1.4:41 ; :>!.. ,,....,Fage 5.. 5035989596'; Sent B(: OFFICE CERT: 921 ; •-,....47.- .7,:44..v..,- • 200 1.7. vcr"eilii::: ...,!...j.,.'.."14, .• ...%:;'. ..f.:,id•••-• FP.:-1:,:,*.■:.......4 4:,...f.r.Le" 7.!:1;,..:,...4..,:•• • cvz.:7,..,.„ „.:,•,.:••:: ...-: ;..:. -.• :i4A,Ii7-?. • .;1;k;,"- . .;.,?1,11.eizi,(Z.:-;•:.:;)‘,....i ,...:.•.t .11;igt.. :44::".......•. v.. .i.;',kitt41 ..!,..;:1,......., ,•• :.' L teit,400....,„„,...,w6s.: . \. . ..::. i...foria.i... .(,..:.iisvv.:...P EPP:;" ''TR E E ;11:T.RfcT.W • ,- -; :::,Mat''..-1-7.- •:; .. .....„:• .,.....• -::-.!,..".,•...• .....:.•- , ,",..-.,. ,....t...„.„,. ... -.... . .. If 4 # '-' ••...:::tC: 4"t.,'-':'.....,.;is;;''....k.:.. ".' , & 315 A1 .919 6 0A0 0C v J C .-.:-.,.....".;:. .i::,-',:1.,1.:4#•,....,-,,M..-.,I.!fI t'■.1,.2...1-..)1.,.1...-1..,,t...1.0Asg.:.i te.:.,',.7...,*.....*.:,..,:..,!,:c;..0.:.-,,;.-.i.,,'Y,.?.,,.•;,.•,..-:.„3,„..„,.....::„O.....tti-r;.,_.,?..,.:,,....1,1•.0..4.?.,,4-,.;7:i7i:,:'.„ :.' j 7. .... r. •••; • ,s.4 -, ,1 -...-. AX.7.1,,;‘,7,;.,.,;40-:.. .R.A. ,,,o.:,.,.., 7 W.3.11:.:,t:,.;'•t`Fir;:•1.. "1'-'24'” -..f:. ,,,:i=,"11.;'; ''''' .t.'..v, -. ° C .41 3040 % .`-ii..A,50:' ,21J—.e.`,V.7,44,i'.1P.,.1'1.k■-..-,.i'•,:•,1-.';.7■,:.tt;z:**"tf.,i't.- :--,——----- laii.aa ;-, I 74 ... ,.....::„.„,,,„.„,„,„..;:: ,2:-..,,,.:. .........,,,,.,,.7,., :14.'5"'-::•: - . ..: ' ...:,::.‘:.:....r.,..:.::;..;•:.is. ••.-• . •• :....,7?.........„ . • . atie% 'r es.aVt''' `14#''`Vit-i'#`"':` `.‘1.'‘Viiiii:es ' : /"..,.: 11.. ......:,:ifE;::gar,-...:.::: : .• .- : 1.1.;,-.ii. refiwItt' , .,:%...... °.., •,-,.5.-... - sc.," ••• ms„,....;:444.,...,-...,;,,:.' ,..,,,,,.t. 11:24,..Jf?..F.;,,,,T},-Ac". :. ; 3200 11 3100 tt' 3000 si.1 2900 :.`,' 2800 6 . .47,4,Y,.4,140101.4'1,:i: 1.-.4. . 3 4 :.-; .. ..,t4il.k4o' ..mv&,k47-7 1- / • 4s,.r..‘ e ...,_ . .: .r..: ..:,... •.. . •,..„..!;.:.4,...,..,....,..tz..4,.„,...• $0,71 00.27 82.26 • (15.0a,.., .„69•BV ...4).1:t :','" '.';'. .::47kP.S7c.'''.' •••"' i ...‘'..';2i1/13514."11.':: :: .........;ittliftil.?•thY. ,..4Y...A11-41 E)FilVE . O ID '5• .1 at'...:%•;t1T1'ql71.'12t;;44 I*...'• IICIR.*«iii;.;:',1. ';,:?:••:•:•. IP j.; ;.. :1..*:••..it.ait7;64.?•:.• : ....37.1)-,a1■7 '..!:::' ri.,1 ,••....37 .••••, f,' . .......;.',.'..:4;?;!....?.•..* . ..."..f...rijiiiilr:::-• a"...7..' ?Q,c ,..,vei,k,.y,w14.1 . —.r,,, •• • \'ivt-a ,%,‘04,401 >: . •.....,,....;;,,r,17::::...... ,. . ,:.. .r... .....1.,.,.,..,q.-r-t. ..,47.,.... 3304640r It02.00402 41 '" r•• ....‘..,:';:ii.tr;;=*,{44.; ', F; ':.•'...:V.:1, ::*;•:!;:f0-.1.1.7 '...Fi','' : 3 ' ',: '::::1,;::1;'•1(0.1//7.44;':',:.•::.).:.:::'.;;74':ri.:•:4;,-kgAV‘.f'.14.Cii:',::,.* *•-:'-',..i.i. :1.-.04:iiif:,,,'"?:,C!'.!:'' i.*.:' '':':100;00,Q;v:Iiir.07.,..C1•.;•,.ten :I# 2 5300 .1-• ' ., 3 S 500 $ 5100 ' ,s; : 3 1703 2 N.i . - EA' • , , . ....•—•,,,,,,,,,,,,v, % 1 c:, 2 fr - ::-•,,,,.;411441.06• 1 9 9 7 — Saa-04.40W •:.... ..1 9 1:"...."..a f..,'•yeas.' ' 'it.....1*-.:.i.-:6,:'.i.t *„.. ••• ):-:.,,,,::': . . r •. •:...•-•;4'.._•: y••?•:s.,-., v.;;. 7g......';;;•;,!';: :;... - -.•.... :':Ald....,;',..:14, '!,..,..,..:• 20il ..!. " .1, c'a ',ill5e..,1;t11...':(AN\'‘ ... . 9..',..?::7•Illii4ti:f.'.u.,..'itille•AC:' ...;',,iz•3•.:;•.'' ''••;,‘?.c.:••••. ----e"--.)------. 10 < 0•';.'4....?.••40,,,, ,.. ...-**,`"•!,..,.,t-....TZPOV4;.'":.:7a.tr;f7.10/-43 ..: • . ...........,... ....„. 0,4 V‘ 1 .:,I....o) .i,:wq,-#.4:`orr. .c--... • •••'•'R'.,44.11,..:. Ogee .,•-•':-./ - .•.: ?'14.:'' '. Iv!1 vt:::. '7,,,if:4,:.=-•.;.i, -...,.--. N ,- • ••s 7 r:7:,4•.t,;„1"cr. ,,,.,-* • 1719 g .**. 1. ' ''':" '...%;7:` .!'.,..•:.--...,:•.:''. --fespe.-k AC 2 • ,....112.2a1 1.144...11 4,,, ... :A :,• ''.•• ,.,...;s1..;;;•,..1:••:4. uur—t-----..., 12 ,.... 4. ,....7•i4ralitrrr'.o2.- --1.•;••z .1±..4'•: ....::.1.211,■:411,74•47/0;.:••• VP a..•a:::....rAf.; 1.,... :•n:.40.74,- -;;...W=fP',..,A%-:,. .:,: • 'C:21 1714 R: , 174::...vol.:v:17/4, .. .. ,i...-....:-:..itt,1•:::.::.. , le.t. -.... tfl 13 * .•••„.:-..'..-:.•.72LI .:•;:i1.7.s.'...'9.',Y7-.7,. i.k..5.."7-ps;!.1.,f';.....fi: :' . o %4t.aa • c.f.Irc •------, . 4,-,*.,....,:::,- ..6,7' -::::?.ts1;',,'...:r...;':,.'.. . • .;".',-...:t•'24431'..g..4;;?.ca ci...MI -.,... '*.f...,.a5'#•ri*:,k,?"... 1709 . L___......._]'::%.*,.. .'.:' 41titaiti......1::,:t• •„•'-7 ,-i'..itim4; : ,.: • . I) 8 • .--/ AA, .. 9.'';'•4!'"; : . .1 W t . • ;7401;•'•07....^Vi'.; 41)1':. -•- •;* . '7. .1 1712 , :„.. 1.- ".•..z.juoc?•••07',1".•• . ' •" • -:,...,.:.:AP,1t ''''! ' • I •;:?;e:' yi.; ,r- 1 0 • 11 •i 'i: , ''.10, .„070:.:.;..:4;.'.1 . , 1.3-1 13111CA . ..., a• igi iiiiibo I 120.30 3...:25 .s.:•• - 2 - eo DJ g • • < __---- ?:• 116 .nos,-,,,,.'‘•:*. 2- . -,-7,. : r..•1 Ill -.; i t. .41...;t-.1..-IR s':...till mt.. . 'azsi....1.F. a 1710 $ 1 9 0 .. A • 1711 14 3 • ... • 2iiiicA, ..: ,..: .. //I- zathill,CA.....:::.:. .'.' soot .... ...., . a 10 .:',. s• 7800 ..„,„.,.... .. ... . 1* .,A..a. 1 1 ..:"; R '.• 22;:.,,..., 2 .7,. Ili 2......re...,;,. )••! , .... i ' .. ... -•'•••-'„ !,..".. • .. :,;:.•.-.:,:.: !': • % 1:•••• ' - • — 12t20 100.05' 101.02 / •J 4t '...712.02:-:• .:...013.22 • 02.1112Ci^ . .64. '• ./ . 6 2 . /' •/ STREET , Is •• ILI b. SW v.— KAB LE. '4. . imoo _ f " 120.23 p .4?-4,.4.2.•!,.. ......5.. . : 47'" . !.15;1..::: .-:..‘..4 It'i...a S. 0 * .96,,,,...,:- • :If •isoaalitt.t1ii f7:11301:0. ti..i.zritt,....i. 221e4coll.G. . 9 v:0320t1t.a......1.1:i...,.....1-.....4'..: got 1 ..f. ., •,..33 .4' '.32 :I .,31:::-::.1 .,`it 21 '19 -..:- i 719 n 1717 9 t716 ua -. a 34 ,..,, . 3 =: a ... 17 ri" 16 XI 16 n •...••• Et . , saw ..- :-woo. .da.60 ..• was".:. , - or: . .-..." i . .. . . . Nasissoaaw I 710.,41 ::: 1.•tStillaii......,,,..... .1 6./. 0 • In ` r� G � ' ) ` PP I I 219 � I E. = a ` I ti v, 11aI J I � 27 i N 10 125 1 1 z. '7= 1 Z2 5' �16 y 1 119 7 to 21e I Z 3. 211 • •‘1) �I 2 4 N US ) V „. .../11 -N--; 1 3 1 , = N D • H Z I AN 1 87 rI STM S' 4 I /DECIDUOU/ C = i CLUSTE I I i 1� x--15 ,--� -� / 1 EXISTING HOUSE ti = D I A43 Cpe. "„I (TO REMAIN) i - •. DECIDUOUS I v 1/212 ~ Z I ■ 1 32 I I.14 I 1 I ( 727 1 I 1 DECIDUOUS I Z ---270 S F N I It 26 ...LA--- ---• H ` VD ��pyl -4 266 z -269 I 266 I i 1 rn 1 GARAGE 265 267 1 I\ (� N D` ' y 264 v 1 266���� 12' l o n D 63 • x 2 z N O I 262 � STREET LIG N6 I a I a P MH'PLI4 T LAND SOLUTIONS, Inc. SCALE. 1" = 30' TWO LOT PARTITION PLANNING PERMITS PROJECT MANAGEMENT 2S-1W-�1CB T.L. 1714 P.O. BOX 38 1EL: 503-722-8585 DATE JULY 2000 15215 S.W. 100th AVENUE 9140P. 0 SE. St. HELENS ST. FAX. 503-722-8555 pR0✓ECT ,81.01 MR. ROGER LONDBERG CKAMAS, OR 97015 LANOSOLUAONS.COM 9 S /7ate- ;: CITY OE TIGARD , - -. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES '`�'''' UTT OP T10AtTD.Ott000M (Pre-Application,Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) ,sfiapingjT ter Community . RESIDENTIAL • • PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: C' / 4`f STAFF Al PRE-APP.: U APPLICANT: 4 — c..- 6c . AGENT: Phone:j(2. ) _2. , Phone: ( ) PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN. LOCATION: / .5 /,5 S(A) /� ,/ r-c TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): a1'///Cg- Of y • NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: 7,7 -%-e,--0--- /cane Pe-- 71 e'.d? • PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: -' _ _ _ d.r. - .r =■ ieJ• s • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I MAP DESIGNATION: Z-0.2c, 102r. ZONING'MAP DESIGNATION: -{ - S • C.I.T. AREA: t.2 FACILITATOR PHONE: (503) ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT SIZE:/000 sq. ft. Average lot width: 6c. ft. Maximum building height: 312) ft. Setbacks: Front.-O ft. Side S. ft. Rear /5• ft. Corner —) ft.from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: t % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: . %. [Refer to Code Section 18..)( 0 1 ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet, unless lot is created through the Land Partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1'/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. [Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page I of I I Residential Application/Planning Division Section • • SPECIAL SETBACKS > Streets: feet from the centerline of . > Flag lot: A ten (10)-foot side y- • setback applies to all primary structures. ➢ Zero lot line lots: A minim • of a,ten (10)-foot separation shall be maintained between each dwelling unit or garage. ➢ Multi-family resident'. building separation standards apply within multiple-family residential developments. (Refer to Code S. on 18.130) ACCESSORY STR 4CTURES UP TO 528 SQUARE FEET in size may be permitted on lots less than 2.5 acres in si,e. Five (5)-foot minimum setback from side and rear lot lines. ACCESSORY ST'UCTURE UP TO 1,000 SQUARE FEET on parcels of at least 2.5 acres in size. (See applica I le zoning district for the primary structures'setback requirements.] SUBDIVISION PIAT NAME RESE'VATION PRIOR TO SUBMI ING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, • applicants are RE*U "ED to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Su ,eyor's Office in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name. Applications will no be accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the County o he Subdivision Name Reservation. - (County Surueyoi's Offic 503-648-8884) FLAG LOT BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 11/2 ST*RIES or 25 feet, whichever is less in most zones; 21/2 stories, or 35 feet in R-7, R-12, R-25 or R-40 zones provided that the standards of Code Section 18.730.010.C.2. are satisfied. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATION (See - ample below) The NET RESIDENTIAL UNIT` ALLOWED on a particular site may be calculated by dividing the net area of the developable land • the minimum number of square feet required per dwelling unit as specified by the applicable zo/ ing designation. Net development area is calculated by subtracting the following land area(s)frc� the gross site area: . All sensitive lands areas in l •in.: ➢ Land within the 10e y•arfloodplain; ➢ Slopes exceedin• 25V0; • ➢ Drainageways; and ➢ Wetlands for to e R- , R-2, R-3.5,•R-4.5 and R-7 zoning districts. / Public ri.ht-of-wa dedica ion: > Single-family allocate 20% of gross acres for public facilities; or ➢ Multi-family alloc. e 15% of gross acres for public facilities; or ➢ If available, the a t tual public facility square footage can be used for deduction. (Refer to Code Cha i ter 18.715) I EXAMPLE OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITY ALCULATIONS: I EXAMPLE: USING A ONE ACRE SIT IN THE R-12 ZONE(3,050 MINIMUM LOT SIZE)WITH NO DEDUCTION FOR SENSITIVE LANDS Single-Family Multi-Family 43,560 sq. ft. of gross ite area 43,560 sq. ft. of gross site area 8.712 sq. ft. (20%)for ublic right-of-way 6.534 sq. ft. (15%)for public right-of-way NET: 34,848 square feet NET: 37,026 square feet 3.050 (minimum lot area ± 3.050 (minimum lot area) = 11.4 Units Per Acre = 12.1 Units Per Acre *The Development Code requires that the net site ea exist for the next whole dwelling unit NO ROUNDING UP IS PERMITTED. *Minimum Project Density Is 80%of the maximum a owed density.TO DETERMINE THIS STANDARD,MULTIPLY THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS BY.8. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of I I Residential Application/Planning Division kction / • • BLOCKS The perimeter • BLOCKS FORMED BY STREETS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1,800 FEET measured along the right .f-way line except where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodie.. of water or, pre-existing development. When block .engths greater than 330 feet are permitted, pedestrian/bikeways shall be provided through the •+ock. (Refer , Cod I I n 1 t.; 1.0901 FUTURE STREET PLAN AND EXTENSION OF SIRE A FUTURE STREET PLAN.shall: ➢ Be filed by the applicant in •injunction with an application for a subdivision or partition. The plan shall show the pattern o' existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division and s all include boundaries of the proposed land division and shall include other parcels within 2110 feet surrounding and adjacent to the proposed land division. ➢ Identify existing or proposed i■us routes, pullouts or other transit facilities, bicycle routes and pedestrian facilities on or withi ' 500 fee • the site. Where necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed. R�ferlo r I de Section 18.810.030.FJ PARKING AND ACCE ALL PARKING AREAS AND DRIVEWAYS MUST BE PAVED. ➢ Single-family Requires: One (1) off-street parking space per dwelling unit; and One (1) space per unit less than 500 square feet. ➢ Multiple-family Requires: 1.25 spaces per unit for 1 bedroom; 1.5 spaces per unit for 2 bedrooms; and 1.75 spaces per unit for 3 bedrooms. Multi-family dwelling units with more than ten (10) required spaces shall provide parking for the use of guests and shall consist of 15% of the total required.parking. NO MORE THAN 51°. OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SP•CES. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standar• parking space dimensions: 8 feet. 6 inches X 18 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Compa t parking space dimensions: 7 feet. 6 inches X 16 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Handi,apped parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dime ioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parki, g spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Ameiicans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped par ing space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. (Refer to Code Section 18.705 a 18.7651 BICYCLE RACKS • BICYCLE KS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMEN . cle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. [Refer to Code Section ;.1651 CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of I I • Res dental Appliation/Planning Dimon Section • • ACCESS WAYS _ inimum number of accesses: / Minimum access width: 75 • Maximum access width: Minimum pavement width: / e • REQUIRED WALKWAY LOCATION Within all ATTACHED HOUSING (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each residential dwelling SHALL BE CONNECTED BY WALKWAY TO THE VEHICULAR PARKING AREA, COMMON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION FACILITIES. (Refer to Code Section 18.7051 CLEAR VISION AR - Ity requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT AT ROAD/DRIVEWAY, ROAD/RAILROAD, AND ROAD/ROAD INTERSECTIONS. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. • ode Chapter 18.7951 UFFERING AND SC order o increase 4 rivacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent de elopments, especially between different land uses, the CITY REQUIRES LANDSCAPED BUFF R AREAS ALONG CERTAIN SITE PERIMETERS. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and everg -en trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. _ ••scurin. scre-1 • fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The require. .i _ -as may only be occupied.by vegetation, fences _ ' iesnd walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes m- - •e found inommunity Development Code. (Refer to • i : :118.7451 The REQUIRED BUFFER AND SCREENIN. STANDARDS that are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: along the north bou :ary. along the east boundary. • along the south :ounda . along the west boundary. EET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two(2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to.40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.705,18.745 a 18.7651 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of I I Residential Application/Planning D vision Section • PIAN 116EmENTI REE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. The TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D. according to the following standards: • Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.790.060.D. of no net loss of trees; • Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; • Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; • Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; . ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. meter to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ ITIGATION ) • CEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: • The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree. removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the . largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property; and ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN-LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 10390.060.11 CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of I I Residential Application/Planning Division Section • ' • GNS PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A •'e - 'nes for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code s - :- •s may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. - .tively, a Sign Code Adjustment application may be filed for Director's review. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1801 SENSITI' � The Code p • -s REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT D I • - AREAS WITHIN THE . 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND A' - ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25%, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminari -ntify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HO ' R, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas. and their boundaries is the res•onsibi he a. .licant. Areas meeting the 5efinitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans sub cited with the development app' ation. Chapter 1 :. 75 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESI• , TIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. (Refer to Col apter 18.7151 STEEP SLOPES When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior : 'ssuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval s . :: •s of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon - : -.•loration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements o Sections 18.775.080.C.2. and 18.775.080.C.3. UNIFIED SEWERA AGENCY(USA]BUFFER STANDARDS,RESOLUTION AND ORDINANCE ER 8 0196-44 LAND DE - OPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated cor or for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: THE VEGETATED CORRIDO- HALL BE A MINIMUM OF 25 FEET WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the -nsitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a .ortion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of t vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetate• corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 fe- . except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25% of the length of the vegetated corridor with', the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width of t - vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO 'structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, .•, 'cation of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which • f-ierwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, EXCEPT AS ALLOWED AS FOLLOWS: CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of I I Residential Appliution/Plmning firnsion Section • • • > A GRAV WALKWAY OR BIKE PATH, NOT EXCEEDING EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. If the • walkway or 1- e path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved o - -vel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than ten (10) feet from the boundary of the = • itive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed • as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and > WATER QUALITY FACILITIES ma encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of ten (10) feet with the approval of the Agency • City. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT HICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS OR LOTS intended for separate ownership, such as a su••ivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any p. cel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. (Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SWMI WATER RESOURCES OVE Y DISTRICT THE WATER "ESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive ° .n and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation • of significant wetlan•s, --ms and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specificall , his chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective s :ndards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian c. ridors;•maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant over; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conse e scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: THE WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO EETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the -fe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions r-quire that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin iver, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1,000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BE• 'ING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than ,100 cubic feet per second{cfs). ➢ MAJOR STREAMS IN TIGARD. INCLU• . FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY C" EKS) AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, D: ry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin 'iver. Riparian Setback Area: THIS AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND P• RALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN A SOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian •rridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). 0TY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of I I Residential Application/Planning Division Section •• . • ➢ • - standard Tualatin River riparian setback is 75 feet, unless modified in accordance with this • ➢ The major st -ams riparian setback is 50 feet, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ Isolated wetlan s and minor streams (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25 oot "water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. [Refer to Code 'ection 18.191.0301 Riparian Setback Reductions The DIRECTOR MAY a PPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM -IPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious su • -ces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major -am resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation •• •reserved portions of the riparian setback area. • Eli•ibili for Ri•arian Setback in Disturb.d Areas. To be ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SE :ACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially.d -turbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the V,.getation Study required by Section 18.797.050.0 that • demonstrates all of the following: ➢ • Native plant species currently cove less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; ➢ The tree canopy currently covers I-ss than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from e on-site riparian.setback area for the last five (5) years; >. That vegetation was not removed co•trary to the provisions of Section 18.797.050 regulating removal of native plant species; ➢ That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and • ➢ The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. [Refer to Code Section 18397.100] NARRATIVE he APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings for all applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. Applicant should review code for applicable criteria. • CODE CHAPTERS . • 1 8.330(Conditional Use) 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) \ 18.165(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) 18.340(Directors Interpretation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) 18.115(Sensitive Lands Review) 18.350(Planned Development) 18.105(Access/Egress/Circulation) 18.180(Signs) 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.110(Accessory Residential Units) 18.185(Temporary Use Permits) • 18.310(Variances/Adjustments) 18.115(Density Computations) • CZ- 18.190(Tree Removal) 18.380(Zoning Map/fext Amendments) 18.110(Design Compatibility Standards) _ 18.195(Visual Clearance Areas) 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) 18.115(Environmental Performance Standards) 18.191(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) 18.130(Exceptions To Development Standards) 18.198(Wireless Communication facilities) 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) 18.140(Historic Overlay) \ 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) • °L' 18.420(Land Partitions) 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) • 18.430(Subdivisions) 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.150(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) 18.155 (Mixed Solid Waste/Recyding Storage) • • 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.160(Nonconforming Situations) ' CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of I I Residential Application/Planning Division Section • • - IMPACT STUDY *art of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to include impact study with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users: In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. - [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The APPLICANT SHAL OTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT F ILITAT• = • heir proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the • mailing date and the - ' g date is requ -d. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notic- * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address b 'Iding code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land • • •plication. ' 'fey I the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) BUILDING PERMITS •R BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). RECYCLING Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) • CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of I I Residential Application/Planning Division Section • • • ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: • • • • • • PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. • . Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. sApplications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1). 81/2 x 11" reduced scale site plan of the proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or Administrative Decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page IO of I I Residential Application/Planning Division Section • • • The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or . protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A ten (10) business day, public appe I period follows all la Jc1,use de isions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard , �.� �� use A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from tic16 Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective .applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. • ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE, (unless deemed unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: �/.%// _��li'� - -/ " - CITY OF IGARO 'LANNING-D _ AlEglr:Idia.travr APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4111 FAX: (503) 684-1291 E-MAIL (staffs first name) @ci.tigard.or.us TITLE 18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE)INTERNET ADDRESS: ci.tigard.or.us H:\patty\masters\Pre-App Notes Residential.doc (Engineering section:preapp.eng) Updated: 28-Feb-2000 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page I I of I I Residential Application/Planning Division kction - • . • . WASHINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENT & TAXATION TAX COLLECTION'DEPARTMENT 155 N. FIRST AVE., SUITE 130 HILLSBORO,OR 97124 * *• * IMPORTANT INFORMATION .* * * * PAYMENT OF PROPERTY TAXES SUBDIVISION PLAT, PARTITION PLAT OR COf�DIMINIUM: i • . Before a,SUBDIVISIONPLAT; PARTITION 41LAT or CONDOMINIUM can be RECORDED and between July 1st and certification of the tax roll, the Real Property taxes must.be • paid in full. This means any SPECIAL -ASSESSMENTS, DELINQUENT TAXES, CURRENT OR PREPAID TAXES, all fees including recording fees required by law. This- may also include DISQUALIFIED FARM, FOREST, SMALL WOODLAND DEFERRALS. An $80.00 fee must be paid and collected prior to the processing of any Subdivision, Partition Plat, and Condominium,etc. to the Cartography Division of Assessment and Taxation. (648-8871) If the Plat etc., is not recorded by June 30th, the$80.00 processing fee will have to be paid again. . CONSOLIDATIONS OR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS: A property CAN NOT be consolidated or adjusted for lot.lines until all taxes and fees are paid full by June 30th. If taxes remain unpaid on July 1st, we are required to collect taxes For any questions regarding the payment of taxes, please call the Washington County Tax Collection office at (503) 648-8801. PREPAYMENT OF TAXES 1 . BEFORE JULY 1st: • All certified taxes on the tax roll must be paid in full on parcel(s) in a subdivision plat or partition plat. After taxes and all fees have been paid, the subdivision plat or partition plat may be recorded. 2. AFTER JULY 1st: Between July 1st and approximately mid October of each year taxes MUST BE PRE-PAID for the current year. The tax amount will be estimated based on current assessed value and the previous year tax rate. Payment must be in the form of GUARANTEED FUNDS, i.e. CASH, CASHIER CHECK OR MONEY ORDER. (see reverse side for Statute reference) (G:PLAT-1 .revised 7.31.951 • • • : STATUTORY REFERENCES � . ORS 92.095Payment of taxes, interest, penalties, fees before subdivisionf or partition plat recorded. (1) No subdivision or partition plat shall be recorded .unless all ad - valorem taxes, including- additional taxes, interest _ and penalties imposed on land disqualified for any special assessment and'all special assessments, fees, or other charges required by law to be placed upon the fax roll have been paid which have become a lien upon the land or which will become a lien during the tax year. • (2) AFTER. JULY 1ST, and before the certification under ORS 311 .105 of any year, the subdivider or partitioner shall: (a) If the exact amount of taxes, penalties, special assessments, fees and charges are able to be computed by the assessor, pay such amount to the tax collector. The assessor is authorized to levy and the tax collector is authorized to collect such amount. (b) If the assessor is unable to compute such amount at such time, pay the amount estimated by the assessor-to be needed to pay the taxes,,- penalties, special assessments, fees and other _ charges to become due • (3) ORS 308.210 (3)(4) (3) The assessor shall not indicate any changes, divisions or transfers of properties which occurred before, on or after July 1st as a result of the division of a lager parcel of land until all ad valorem taxes, fees and other charges placed upon the tax roll on the entire parcel of property have been certified for.collection under ORS 311 .105 and 311.110 have been paid. (3) Require the assessor to reflect on the assessment roll any combining of properties unless all ad valorem taxes, fees or other charges charged to the tax accounts to be combined that have become delinquent have been paid PLAT.7.31.95.REVIS ED lMr . . WATERWISE LANDSCAPING GUIDE • The rapid growth in our community can been everywhere. With this growth has come the realization that we must manage all of our natural resources efficiently to preserve the beauty we have come to expect in our area. In addition to the growth and the need for additional water sources in many areas, has come additional federal regulations imposed on the water industry. All of these factors create increased rates for our water customers and the need for everyone to use the water we do have efficiently. In our area, landscape irrigation is one of the single largest uses of water. Although it is seasonal, usually May through September,the demand during that period is great. Along with the increased use,is the increased cost for that water. Businesses are a vital part of our community. Operating expenses are always of concern. Water efficient landscape and maintenance can help curb these expenses. Studies have shown that compared to traditional landscape,water-efficient landscape can reduce exterior water consumption by over 40%, reduce labor by 25%, reduce fertilizer costs by over 60%, and reduce herbicide costs by over 20%.This basic water-efficient landscape guide has been developed to assist you in the design phase and the future maintenance of your property. „:-:<:,. :;- ,::•4-; . .-- DESIGN =jy=``�'� �t� %`o Y$o, :s; Design is one of the fundamental items in water-efficient landscape. Zoning -r . °$`••: • plant roots to go deep down into the soil. Shallow plant roots can be avoided by watering deep and less often forcing roots down into the soil making the plant healthier and able to tolerate stress conditions better. IRRIGATION Irrigation controllers should be dual or multiple program controllers. Controllers should have at least two independent programs and be capable of initiating separate water cycles in the same day. They should contain default programs, a rain switch, manual and semi-automatic start capabilities, be UL listed and have a circuit breaker. Rain shut off devices or moisture sensors should be installed on all automatic irrigation systems. Valves and circuits should be separated based on water use zones. Shrubs and ground cover should be zoned separate from turf. Turf will require much more water than a majority of the other plant material. t °--6°.t Select the appropriate type of irrigation for the plant material ------ within a zone. All heads within a zone should have matching precipitation % -.. �.\ rates to insure a higher efficiency rate for the irrigation system. Drip or sub- --; \ ff surface irrigation should be used in areas less than 10 feet in width, and in I ,� '–' —'4. # most areas not planted in turf. I'� ^" �I ' \�i ...7_ � �-,J The spacing of spray heads within an irrigation zone should be ` .• / �� j I 1 designed to provide triangular or square spacing. This will allow■ ��,• �_�_-X.._i head coverage proportionate with their designed specifications. This D o encourages the system to be designed for minimum run-off and overspray 4 onto non-irrigated areas. ,GUARE (PI.GO1G (A ouLArc 6PAGI146 Pressure regulators are encouraged to be incorporated into all irrigation systems to prevent excessive pressure at the sprinkler heads. 0.o.....* " Sprinkler heads should not operate at pressures that exceed their design e•�.ci,,between L• w.owac-between tow* - « r.roc.,,, -tread ., ,)- capacity as misting or fogging can occur,wasting water. Most drip.systems R Or ..PP7.IC..7Yg0(,,,,a,�„r) cannot operate on more than 30psi. MAINTENANCE Although the plant selection and efficient irrigation systems within a landscape are important, as important is the need for proper landscape management. The use of`drought tolerant'or water conserving plants themselves will not save water. The people in charge of the landscape maintenance will control whether or not water efficiency is achieved after the design and installation has been completed. The owner must reinforce the need for efficient water management to those in charge of their landscape maintance. The water consumption of plant material changes as the plants become established, and from season to season. It is advised that a water schedule be made and posted by the controller. This schedule should outline the irrigation zones that have been established and the variation of watering needs for the plants within that zone. Also included should be the watering needs of the landscape palette according to the seasonal changes and the growth rate to maturity of the plant material. Since,the landscape manager of a property may change, outlining these items should alert the maintenance personnel to the water needs of various zones and avoid excessive watering. Electrical controllers should be set to water between 7pm and 10am. Insure each zone is programmed to avoid runoff. Several cycles might be necessary in the same zone to accomplish this. Created and distributed in cooperation by Tualatin Valley Water District, City of Hillsboro, City of Tigard and Washington County. TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN ci,3 TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON [� CAPITAL PROJECTS&FACILITIES DIVISION 710 N.E.HOLLADAY STREET -N`, PORTLAND,OREGON 97232 November 24, 1999 Dick Bewersdorff City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Tri-Met's Transit Oriented Development Advocacy Pamphlet . Dear Dick: Greetings! Here is the TOD pamphlet that we have been promising to distribute. Thanks for your comments and willingness to support our continued efforts to raise awareness in the development and investment community. We feel that this pamphlet is a good consolidated summary of many of the site design elements that can be used to create a better pedestrian and transit environment. As you can see, most of these design elements are still applicable to development that may not be currently well served by transit. It is our intention that these pamphlets be distributed at the permit counter or center, and also at pre-application conferences. The earlier we can inject this information into the planning process, the more likely we are to see positive results. I have enclosed 40 copies and a single-sided original of the pamphlet. If possible, we encourage you• to use the original to make additional copies as needed. If you have any questions or suggestions, please call me at 962.2102. Thanks again for yo assistance. Sincerely, 06.41 Michael Kiser Project Planner • (503)238-RIDE • TTY 238-5811 • http://www.tri-met.org i 11. Street Connectivity t Submittal Checklist: TRANSIT AND PEDESTRIAN As art of the Transportation rd P P ; 1. Is your site on a transit street. Call 238-RIDE or check ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT Planning Rule,design continuous e /ii Tri-Met's web page at www.tri-met.org. new private and public streets by providing connections to and °��� 2. If your site is on a transit street,please locate the nearest bus from adjoining developments. A transportation system that is well I o ,' ;i! - stop to your site. This can be done through field verification. connected will reduce outof-di- region travel for pedestrians and Disconnected cul-de-sacs ti dead end 3. Include the bus stop location on all site plans submitted for = _ automobiles,and will reduce con- streets limit access(above),while development review. °"' . ; t continuous streets help to maximize ' gestion. When developing adja- u' '_ 's�' .'`ite' Ill =1 ! P <1,, `• ,:.;.. connectivity and reduce out-of 1 ti "~V's, - cent to vacant parcels,stub streets a ill-4 •r` t j. ; - 5'--•P directiontravel(below) Did You Address. C h1 �?=-M;r. .. t p. s::- and pedestrian paths at the prop- . ' + ,:_ . �;r"".: I III ■? e line to facilitate future ex an- _'' ■ ill 0,0,-.3-.:4.4 ., 41,4... s> .86 r Sion. Cul-de-sacs and dead end ADA Landing Pad _ __fat a 3! '^i;; _S"y, ��t3 . ��d��1_ ❑ Building Orientation . .. ,42f,}o. tb a3 `� , " streets should be avoided unless ce_ -helm —e�s� Mme' oLo_iF.sem•n mi>r ? � ����� rijr -- ❑ Awnings or Overhangs I '� `�+sT,�'i: �.:° :`= h s: ��F+�) l site conditions prohibit direct a ,f' 1s ��"1►� s ■ 1 street connections. r???�-^i,i ' ❑ �sfs!_ t 'I��, Interactive Walls 5 �. 'F ' � ��� 'J `�,v+la?1 ❑ On-Bice Pedestrian Network _ _= t; 12. Sidewalk Planting / ''' ❑ Direct Connections to Building Entrances g a `;/,.,</W1_ 1 k ❑ Pedestrian Crossings Strips i NA'� { mf ItMi.� ❑ Walkable Blocks As the Portland regional population grows,so does traffic congestion.New Planting strips encourage walking y tutu-ii-.i F-L=tj t-fli ❑ Pedestrian Scaled Lighting •developments,especially those that are auto oriented, continue to strain • ' 1 ' ❑ Street Connectivity the existing transportation system. There are design alternatives that will • by providing a spatial buffer be- Y tween automobile traffic and the ❑ Sidewalk Planting Strips help new development offset their impacts on congestion and contribute to • pedestrian network,without re- creating sustainable communities. Transit oriented development(TOD) represents a new model for development that emphasizes the importance areas. g excessively large paved `T it �.• ?i Thank You! -,; v of the pedestrian environment, direct access to transit and a mixture of areas. Not only will this improve_ acs f> � ) complementary land uses. • the sense of security for pedestri- 41k. �: ans,but it will also provide a real ri '1'1-A degree of separation from dust, -r The Purpose of this Pamphlet gravel,and splashing water stirred -:'-'5•;:=-=-------7- ,-";_.-.._ Questions? Tri-Met has published the Planning and Design for • up by passing vehicles. Street ;'-'? -Cr -1• This pamphlet outlines some design alternatives that can make new devel- P Y P g t ;' Transit Handbook that describes these design concepts in greater P P g . trees area critical element,espe- ��� � opment more transit oriented. Incorporating these recommendations into detail. If you have any questions,or would like to find out more cially adjacent to higher volume proposals will help developers anticipate public need, fulfill Tri-Met re- nreecs,because they not only en- about the Handbook or transit oriented development,visit Tri"- Having planting strips,along with Met's web page at www.tri-met.org or contact us at: quirements and potentially expedite review processes. Nance the perception of safety, vertical street elements such as trees, but also provide a real physical lampposts,bollards,etc.,between From a developer or investor perspective, transit oriented development barrier between cars and pedes- pedestrians and the street provide a real L A N D makes good business sense. As population and congestion increase,mobil- . trians. and perceived sense ojsajery ity becomes a higher priority for building tenants,customers and residents. - e D E V E L O P M E N T Incorporating mixed use or connecting developments with nearby activi- ties makes daily functions more convenient. These connected functions . kfil also make transit,bicycling and walking more attractive alternatives. In- 710 N. E. Holladay St. eluding the design elements described in this pamphlet will contribute to the marketability,livability and sustained vitality of your development. TRI-MET Portland, Oregon 97232 Ph. (503)962.2145 Fx. (503)962.2281 � r TRI-MET • 1 • • ,Tri-Met's Role in Development Review 3. Building • ;;;,_� 8. Pedestrian Crossings The state mandated Transportation Planning Rule(TPR)specifies that lo- Orientation c:; e, •••►.d e' cal jurisdictions must notify Tri-Met of any proposed private and public �.= �tii" 4:14.-4, c.`` r Provide pedestrian crossings where Tii development that is on or near a transit corridor. Doing this provides Tri- Buildings are one of the greatest i< ■ .:1 streets and on-site driveways inter- .,�... to t• �: sett with sidewalks. By using a side- 1.Met with the opportunity to comment on proposed developments and rec- site design elements that can be ; Y g E,` °•°' R'°='``' walk rade crossin or a char e of J' t ommend ways to make them transit and pedestrian oriented. If followed, used to support the pedestrian r I wnc: - , , g change � ��; f, Tri-Met's recommendations will help make new developments compliant network. Buildings close to the t'I _r° •` -D�.., paving materials,the pedestrian net- ._ r.. 0� with the TPR. street provide visual interest and c. I I; • n - work becomes more defined and , -• -.,-._ 4;1'1.1.. ..,, activity that entices people to - • .. °^......,i.,' 0 c drivers are alerted'to approaching pe- walk farther. In addition, good — --• :7! ''.4.1"'"_ ,c a;7s,'_r;,o destrians. LEI)sue 1. Is there a bus stop adjacent to your site building orientation improves pe- i,'°.;'°-• f!,44 , •Clz 9. Walkable Blocks •-- .= - ,7a destrian access and helps to pre- � . i °' • '�•" .�, ,� , vent conflicts with vehicles. `� ';; �� If a bus stop is adjacent to your site(see back panel),please indicate it Buildings oriented to the pedestrian network ? :: 12 i . P adjacent Y P �'P P Over the years,block sizes have been ' on your plans. This will help you to orient pedestrian links and build- with awnings along the facade • Y -•;;,y ing locations to the transit street and stop,and it will assist planners 4. Awnings or increasing and have heavily contrib Overhangs Along Building Facades uted to eroding the quality and con- Sidewalk-grade crossings slow traffic when reviewing your application. Tri-Met and the reviewing jurisdic- tinuity of the pedestrian network. in areas of greatest traffic congestion tion will be able to make better recommendations with this additional information. In a region with high precipitation,providing awnings or overhangs pro- Traditional neighborhoods within sects pedestrians from the weather and promotes walking and transit use the Portland region were designed as travel options. Place these elements on all facades of the building that to accommodate the pedestrian by f r-' 2. ADA Accessibility- Sidewalk Improvements P g creating blocks that provide pedes- - are located adjacent to the pedestrian network. g P P `._ trian linkages every 200 to 250 feet. / �tri�y�e \__ It is important that individuals with disabilities have good access to - This has resulted in walkable blocks `� 4 transit. If your site is adjacent to an existing bus stop,include an ADA 5. Interactive Walls •c—j ® 3. Y adjacent g P. that minimize out-of-direction • row landing pad as part of your frontage improvements. This will enable travel. Walkability is key to the vi- 1 r--1 °•y„aroy/7 passengers to get on and off the bus easily when using the wheelchair Large,uninterrupted walls•discourage pedestrian activity by creating wind tality and livability of the region and J1 /o/ ®�\ lift. Usually, this only requires that you make the sidewalk slightly tunnels and increasing the perception of unsafe or deserted walking ar- will help to ensure the success of new iT(vrza`-- 1° '°. mo'��wider at the existing stop. eas. People will walk longer distances if there are active uses and inter- develo ments. Provide roadwa s °estm desi n details alon the wa Elements such as windows,buildin P Y n° j.t g g g Y' g every 200 to 400 feet for a maximum, , �I It� entrances, amenities and displays add to the variety along pedestrian 1,600-foot block perimeter. Well-de- �- 1� '° .evsnor routes. I �: : signed roadways and driveways are ' -- --- �//� - perceived as being safer and prefer- Space streets and driveways so that the • A 6. On-Site Pedestrian Network able to pedestrian and bike exclusive perimeter"block"does not exceed 1,600 feet I� oo �// /' pathways. in length,including supplemental pedestrian s� � t• - On sites greater than 1 acre,there is an opportunity to create an on-site linkages pedestrian network that provides clear connections within the project 10. Pedestrian Scaled area and to off-site destinations such as transit stops and other support- >s 1.:.:-,':::.:',:::.1.:... / ) - ing land uses. Improved access and connection,along with the separa- Lighting ,.:' ,� tion of pedestrian and automobile traffic,encourages people to walk. tl• Incorporate ornamental lighting no -,� �� --... , �'i:�-y i greater than 12 feet in height into ati" �w, -• -7. Direct Connections to Building Entrances r-.-•. •k-: _ areas targeted for pedestrian activity. {: f{ • "°°"I NOTE ADA ..s.,..,. This provides the opportunity to `-,• �• s • ym P PP Y .. a p If buildings are not placed directly on the public street,link the building • focus brighter lighting levels in pe- + ” �,, ,, entrances to the primary pedestrian network with clearly visible and destrian areas,allowing lower levels I' 1 `. v„°,° ""°,"'s"' convenient walkways. This element draws pedestrians to the entrance. elsewhere,and adding to the legibil- 1 I , 1. ' r * . Incorporating trees,lighting and diverse landscaping(perennials,shrubs, Iz , ) • `'° rP g g g P g(P ity of the pedestrian networks. and annuals) will make these connections more visible and interesting II rA55tuGtS LANCING ArEA5 rnsstraaat LANDING M�,tS for pedestrians. Mark entrances so that they can be easily seen from the la i I 1_ SIDEWALK.WITH'IAnmo 55W' 05W-GHT SIOE1V.ILK -- — transit stop. Pedestrian scald lighting helps to distinguish paths and improve safety • ADA landing pad specifications - 71411CITTELSONA ASSOCIATES, lir. . TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 6 tC Si ALDER.SJP(E 700 • PORT I AND.Olt v s • (50312"ti-523o • FAX($0.1)2r.!14110 August 20, 1996 Project*: 2234.00 • • • Mr.David Ripley .Ripley's Furniture • 14170 SW Pacific Highway - 1;g(u d,OR 97224 RE: Trip Generation Analysis:Ripley's Furniture Store Expansion- Tigard,Oregon Dear Mr. Ripley: • Purwant to your r gust. Kittelson & Associates, Inc., has prepared an analysis of trip generation for the proposed expansion of Ripky's Furniture Store, located south of Highway 99W in Tigard. Oregon. This • letter documents the tinding of that analysis. - The existing store is located on the east side of Highway 99W. between SW McDonald Street and SW Canterbury Street in Tigard. Oregon. According to the proposed site plan, the existing structure will te� eraanded to include an additional 4,794 square-feet of showroom and wariavuse space. The store will total 33,486 square-feet after the proposed modifications have been made. An estimate of daily vehicle trip ends for the proposed expansion was developed from empirical observations Jr t:tl:er similar furniture stores. These observations are summarized in the standard reference ntantrel, Trip Generation,5th Edition.published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers(1991 1. As shown in the table below, the proposed expansion will generate 17 additional daily driveway trips,of which only 15 trips will • be new to the transportation system. Trip Generation • Size ITE Land Land Use (sq. ft.) Use Code Daily Trips (1 Existing Furniture Store • 28,692 890 180 • Proposed Expansion 4,794 Expanded Furniture Store 33,486 890 197 Total Now Trips • . • 17 Pass-ty Trips (2C%) 3 Net New Trips • 14 \ties:(1)-based on t 1 L•equation. F I1•:>`.\NP:I I:WU(t;rr:.�23417RIr(.I N 1E1 • • • • • • • Mr.David Riplay Projocr.2234.00 August 20, 1396 Pima!2 2 • cruet this letter adequately addresses the trip generation issues associated with the Riplcy'c furniture Store Expansion in Tigard,Oregon. Please do not hesitate to call me if_ynu have any questions or comments. Sincerely, t:ITTCLSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. • Matt Lorenz Project Manager cc: Wit Peterson, Ralston Architects • • Kirreson &A s.ocie:cs. inc. Po/rt+rnd Oic2on • S PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE rOTES ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q Community ityof ig r Orep on Shaping A Better Community PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Manta 25111 CB Tax Lottsl: 1114 Use Type: Residential Partition The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: . The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. • Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet Street improvements: ® 1/2 street improvements will be necessary along SW 100th Avenue, to include: ® 16 feet of pavement from centerline to curb ® concrete curb ® storm sewers and other underground utilities ® 5-foot concrete sidewalk 0 Z street trees spaced per TDC standards. ® street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department Section ❑ street improv ents will be necessary along SW iv; to include: • ❑ feet of palrment ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. • ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees • ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which•requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section which waives the property o' is right to remonstrate against th ormation of a local improvement district. The following street MI5 rovements may be eligible for sucW agreement: (1.) SW 100th Avenue. (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: ® Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW 100th Avenue. Prior to recording of the final plat, the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers:. The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located SW 100th Avenue. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to tap the main line and extend two laterals to each parcel to serve the existing house and the new house. • Water Supply: The City of Tigard (Phone:(503) 639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 526-2469] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Submit a plan for how the new house and lot will be drained to the public system. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to en�6rce Surface Water Management ( M) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a.provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee. is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ❑ Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ® Payment of the fee in-lieu. Pay this fee only for the new lot. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access.to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. Pay TIF on the new parcel only;payable at the time the building permit for the house is pulled.. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section Street Opening PerSOP). This permit covers relativelyainor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such air dewalk and driveway installation Alt pair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. This type of permit requires a non-refundable $150.00 fee. In certain cases, where City costs may exceed the $150.00 fee, an administrative deposit will be required. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. This type of permit requires a deposit to be submitted with the construction plans. The amount of the deposit depends upon the overall value of the public improvements. The City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section Other Permits. There other special permits, such asAwchanical, electrical.and plumbing that may also be req d. Contact the Development Servilig Counter for more information. • • GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between' 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. • • -A ' PREPARED BY: ■AtrAL.; E f"INEERING D PARTMENT STAFF Phone: (5031639-4111 Fax (5031684-1291 i:\eng\brianAtemplates\preap notes-eng.dot.doc Revised: April 21,2000 • CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section P st r 1. :"Iik i._Tr„ 'k ^ tz 3;)4 ''1.3 f.¢ ., t .x-46 4 c ' 4 :x .'*. 6R ;'-'" it ,/ , f ; `:41 f : 7PREAPPLICATI N COF ERE CE NOT ES ' u 'i � f : : OrlYAR avo ;14.-: " 7: . .i: ` <''ns4,- 4 =g ^iL.;"` ;..'t .r. r.,.:4, s. . _''d �.Zi `r g34C—gml_IJcDe z e Pre licaon Meetin: Notes,areoad for iii� 6'Months s� fi i' com RESIDENTIAL PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: ©'/ 7 4 - STAFF AT PRE-APP.: U APPLICANT: ‘0 -4k AGENT: Phone:j03) _2. '7( Phone: ( ) PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN. LOCATION: / .�2 /,S S(,() /Qi 4 • TAX MAP(S)/LOT#(S): aC///CR- Of ?i y �NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: j�� �o-� /c ere --- es'-xi PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: —7 ��, _ _ - 0 � s -_ - !__,.. 6, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: •- �•` - - `%/' �0 / ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: 5 S C.I.T. AREA: FACILITATOR: PHONE: (503) ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT SIZE:/OOOt sq.ft. Average lot width: 65 ft. Maximum building height: 3a ft. Setbacks: Front-2 ) ft. Side -t ft. Rear /3 ft. Corner- C-' ft.from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: %. [Refer to Code Section 18..E/ 0 1 ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet, unless lot is created through the Land Partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 times the average width, unless the parcel is less than VA times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. (Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page I of I I lesidmtiwl Application/Planning Diywon Section CITY OF TIGARD. LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: I/ ,% fki_ . ..��� Date: 51c3. q/ c 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed #10 envelopes and a notarized mailing list of all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (#10), addressed with 1" x 4" labels (see attached envelope submittal requirements) Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): 44 Vicinity Map Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan Existing Conditions Map °ice Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map CIEr Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan cgr._ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan ' Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Cf- Site Development Plan ❑ Architectural Drawings 2 Landscape Plan ❑ Sign Drawings Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES /Z_ COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 i • • • 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis ❑ Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 81 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map • Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10%slopes or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ • Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with>_6"caliper measured 4' from ground level ❑ • Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ • Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 j • 41) The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ .Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ • Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ • Scale, north arrow and date ❑ • Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10%grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location,type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands and marsh areas The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries -❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for slopes 0-10%or 5'for slopes >10%) • ❑ Location,width and names of streets, easements and other-public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25'of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4' above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ • Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ • Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 • Lit • • . Site Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations,dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways Cl • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25'of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s) of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation S ❑ Landscape Plan Location of trees to be removed ❑ • Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ • Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ • Public Improvements/Streets Plan • Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 • • Grading/Erosion Control Plan The locations and extent to which grading will take place El • Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ • Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan • Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ • Location, width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ is\;curpin\masters\revised\chkl ist.doc 26-Nov-98 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 • • Pre-Apps (CD Meetings) May 2000 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Thursday, May 04, 2000 8:00 8:30 9:00 Roger Londberg, 260-0094... 9:30 10:00 Pre-App 10:30 11:00 Pre-app 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 9:18AM Thursday,April 27,2000 • 0 • • Customer Receipt CITY OF TIGARD Printed:04/27/2000 09:20 User: front • Station: 02 Operator: DEB Rcpt No: 0001729 Date: 04/27/2000 Customer No:000000 Amount Due: 240.00 Name: ROGER A LONDBERG Cash: 0.00 Address: 4618 FOX LANE S Check: 240.00 . SALEM, OR 97306 N/A 0.00 Change: 0.00 Type Description Amount LANDUS Land Use Applications 240.00 • , I L P . s a 5` loo " 4e .re • 5 - -� 9;60,9, • • • • t e a u &s 4- -For P re - Ape/�c��ro�, C re ce Own 'r.s ulcer L c;;, c{ b-er, qn /- 8ctr-ess /S lS S. cJ , / acT c , Tilgr� op 97zz1-/ • —re l-e p 0,-) .e. 70 - 7os 3 r;'o m e co ? S / i/ C6 - 6 ( 7' V • . • • • b -e scr1P--io ki o -r- pro Pose / ry d v q m li!Q r Z. 4 pi p4 i--11 7"/(1,7 Gil SPIN o -(-ic 011 -e /O/ 000 So u4,---e Foo ÷ Lcs -F, Th-e /a -F !,milou // b -e uS- -.Fcr 4-11 -e e01.1S4-ruLT 7v7 c• ei Sl,'t5 )-e reS 1 -ek? c e ow P. Ste - free l c. UPc;1 off P , 017 q 1 , 152_ 1S S , f,j , •7,,Jo ' ''. . +-,••• - -• 7ar i o , g '•7 _ 2.- `7/ . . 9 ' .............-- . 1 o ' °--3--- • --- ----- .._.... . .. , . -;0 , 03 pr, pose • .—-—---—-——-— it/s1 I k 1' in -1 "t 0 [ LI/ ' 11/ ' i — 1 • 171- I I 1 , et , .- 1-- ''''2' I • N N Us ki) 1 — -• . \-\6°5 I _ 0 I - • 7(1' p C■1 1 ,c)N V' 151-1 1 1 1 1 1 , (;\ 1 -,) 1 1 - I- 1 o 1 I q 1 1 2.3 . , . Igo ' . 1 ,,■ / j . ,