The URL can be used to link to this page

MLP2000-00005 MLPZ000 ocoo5 • • A lertt CITY OF TIGARD • Community Development Shaping Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 10/25/00 FILE NO.: MLP2000-00005 FILE TITLE: SCHMIDT INEZ PARTITION OWNER: Troy Schmidt APPLICANT: Corbin Shays/Urban Visions 10190 SW Inez Street 2123 SE 12m Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97214 PHONE/FAX: 797-9567 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting to partition one existing lot of 22,548 square feet into two lots of 10,009 and 11,940 square feet with a 600 sq. foot dedication. LOCATION: 10190 SW Inez Street; WCTM 25111 BC, Tax Lot 02200. ZONE: R-3.5: Low—Density Residential District, The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, CRITERIA: 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, 18.810. CIT AREA: West CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ® TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: JULY 3, 2000 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: JULY 18. 2000 ❑HEARINGS OFFICER IMONJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 1:00 PM ❑PLANNING COMMISSION [MONJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM ❑CITY COUNCIL (TUESJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 1:30 PM ®STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE DATE OF DECISION: 8/10/2000 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION ® VICINITY MAP ® LANDSCAPING PLAN ❑ ARBORIST REPORT • SITE PLAN ❑ ARCHITECTURAL PLAN ❑ TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ® NARRATIVE ® GEOTECH REPORT ❑ OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner (503) 639-4171 Ext. 317 Route To: Surveyor ✓ Development Review Engineer ✓ FINAL PLAT REVIEW CHECKLIST Plat Name: •MZ Case Number(s) V\LP Zcxxw -MOO S Address: \b k°10 5V'J rJE-�. (Do NOT release addresses to the public without consent of the Engineering Department.) Contact name and phone me-4.-+ C f-t S e '(.2 SO-- o keg (Fill in when plat is dropped off) DATE RECEIVED: \V DATE FORWARDED TO SURVEY: to SURVEY SECTION Check if Check if Considered Okay 1. Street alignment and width,continuity [a'AM M 2. Curve,corner, cul-de-sac radii EK,A 3. Dedication,vacation, easement conveyance 1E1 4. Residential Survey Certificate match the map Er Comments: irtA4.4 wez-i-- Aso , 16;4 y /t lc, hem/ C v 0,-e 100,3-L . 'a By: S 1'7'11 X0-30- 2OD0 Surveyor's Sign., e Date Page 1 of 1 1:1FNGP W-DENFIN-PLAT.DOT 4f. • • • Returned to Surveyor for Correction BY: tom- 14-or. c.w.itasfzs DATE: 2-1 2At:0 t • Fax to County Surveyor: "OK to review" BY: `q - DATE: 122\0( _7C Corrections viewed and Approved BY: ��o� �-pie----A DATE: 11 xo\01 • T. co./. r 1pp1411/$. 'Co wlEs� 14$k Forwarded for City Signatures BY: DATE: Copy of Signed Plat Made and Put in File BY: DATE: Released to Developer for Recording BY: TaC IP-4c,-two DATE: G, � > ATT t-�D 411010 Authorize Eng. Tech I to release addresses BY: Date: Copy of Signed Plat to DST's BY: _ Date: Page 4 of 4 t:VENaauvoevTw�.wrnar fri LPZ000 - ococs MAP Ft LS r 0.999927502 SCALE FACTOR TO CONVERT GROUND MEASUREMENTS TO GRID MEASUREMENTS S 89'24'51" E 1655.10' (PUBLISHED) S 89'47'51" E 1655.22' -_4)5. FD 2" BRASS DISC IN MONUMENT BOX-"" OX 5 22 (MEASURED} NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF S.W. MCDONALD PARTITION PLA. T • STREET AND S.W. 105TH AVENUE N.W. 1/4 OF SECTION 11 RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. STATION DESIGNATION GC 022-045 " NORTHING 647033.579 '� LFD 2" BRASS DISC IN MONUMENT BOX A REPEAT OF A PORTION OF LOTS 20 AND 21, TIGARDVILLE HEIGHTS" FASTING 7615439.423 SOUTHERLY S.E. CORNER IN THE(PUBLISHED STATE PLANE tom. N.W.W 1 4 SECTION 11, T.2S., R.1 W., W.M., GEO. RICHARDSON D.L.C. 38 CITY OF TIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON COORDINATE) v2A. STATION DESIGNATION GC 022-046 ' ' T I G A R D V I L L E H E I G H T S NORTHING 647016.657 SEPTEMBER 25, 2000 SCALE 1"=40' - r EASTI N G 7617094.432 PLANNING FILE NO. MLP 2000-00005 ED STATE N(PUBLIS IN 647027.55465 COORDINATE) SHEET 1 OF 2 %\\\ EASTING 7617094.634855 '\ (MEASURED COORDINATES) \ Q (k:) \ 7- FD 3/4" IP HELD w ON R/W ON R/W S 00'09'00" W 2.66' FD 5/8" IR NO RECORD NO RECORD 01v _� N O \Ilk 116.84 117.08' J 304.19' N.W. CORNER OF LOT 20 . 9.. • S 89'51'00" E 2..* or- /-- S.W. INEZ STREET ( ) N (S 89'51'00" E S1 ) S 89'51'00" E 419.03' (419.02'(D1)) N.E. CORNER �`'' S 89'51'00" E 248,37' (248.30'(S2)) b -''1 (5 89'51'00" E (Si))i\, 8�S OF' �NGS LOT 20 .-- N 1 - N 'J 'DU" w 1 \ 747.23' „- _ 120.00' (120.00' D1)) t -. 1 ''` 1 .��-n 228.18' 5.00' « 1 5.00'-�-0 ».-,�` 148.70' 89.99' • 160.37' . -� C H > f S 89'51'00" E 104.99 t F > » ►, 20' 20' ' f FD 3/4" IP MONUMENT FALLS MONUMENT FALLS B } 2a ?Q HELD b INITIAL. POINT S 00'09'00" W 0.18' S 00'09'00" W 0.17' HELD FD 3/4' IP S 70'24'46' E 0.33' HELD ' FD 5/8" IR , I SN 10,723 SN 10,723 FD 3/4" II' SN 6389 2 20' Iw NO RECORJ 2 a co 5.00' WIDE �' 0 • RIGHT OF WAY 0 N 3 P� 1 ;° DEDICATION 0 It W 4 0° AREA 10,007 S.F. AREA 600 S.F. W co Z 1 z al 3t k .0) 5 .-. x p. f� fl (4 p� o° 01)' W �°• 0-\.,�� IFS N o z in • -.A0 <S 89'51'00" E 104.99' 0,.. 0 0isv 2 p�4 $ S -r R v v.. 6 PSI 2 \, 0 la AREA 11,941 S.F. S HELD FOR in tQ MOST NORTHERLY NE �• FD 3/4' IP goo z CORNER OF PARCEL 3 •--'�. (:p:)LOT 21 LINE S 0009'00" W 0.16' PARTITION PLAT NO. 1992-077 t V) SN 10,885 MONUMENT FALLS HELD FOR HELD FOR S 00'09'00" W 0.22' / _ SOUTH UNE SOUTH LINE -\ j. • A ii 35.80' 19.70 64.50 N 89'51'00" W N 89'51'00" W N 89'51'00" W I S X39'51' E 120.00' "' 68.13' 80.96' 89.96' N 89'51'00" W 155.11' FD 3/4' IP (120.00'(D1)) t,,G'`) TRACT » A » S 68'35'18" E 0.67' /y �IP. SN 1 0,723 FD 3/4' IP �� NO RECORD / �0C,\°' 1 N�a0. EAST LINE '� '0°C)-°1° QG� � 553'58" W 0 Q 0.40' 'tij Ct, N LEGEND: �� 0.4C. �-0 SET 5/8" x 30" IRON ROD W/ RED PLASTIC Q Q CAP SCRIBED CENTERLINE CONCEPTS INC. ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2000 P A R T I T I O N P L A T NO. 1 9 9 2 - 0 7 7 • FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED ■ FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD W/ YELLOW PLASTIC CAP SCRIBED "WIL. MC. LS 808" FROM PARTITION PLAT NO. 1992-077 SIGNED ON: 4' 20 •0 1 A FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD FROM SN 8462 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL • FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD LAND SURVEYOR FROM SN 9849 = RECORD DISTANCES & BEARINGS Wod . & t IP = IRON PIPE OREGON FD = FOUND W/ = WITH > 00 3, ru.Y 1. R/W = RIGHT OF WAY f./-. 03,4 WADE G• �IOVAN IC SN = SURVEY NUMBER V cr ..z. - WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEY RECORDS z VALID THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2001 C e n t e r I i n e Concepts Inc. 01 = FEE NO. 96-87668, WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS 640 82ND DRIVE GLADSTONE, OREGON 97027 P1 = PLAT OF "TIGARDVILLE HEIGHTS", 503 650-0188 FAX 503 650-0189 WASHINGTON COUNTY PLAT RECORDS S1 = SN 6389 SCALE 1" = 40' S2 = SN 10,723 DRAWN BY:MPW CHECKED BY:WGDIII ACCOUNT #150-3726 M:\BND\SCHMIDT3726\SCHMIDTPP r ..P G (/ 6,21 (,✓ STATE OF OREGON '" �1 °-t' Cy of Washington SS I, Jerry :.t e. :, •� of Ass After recording, return to: Clerk for ess- ment and 4S411" < .'o Coun(. /..,i 1.ikr A � rtify that City of Tigard -Records Division the with' , ie .. ; _ eceived ; 13125 SW Hall Blvd. and re./. . "`';_ `�;., %.?, , countys � t f said . Tigard OR 97223 �.L� x �� 1 ;aFr, , * +- **.00 T � k , 2 irector of WASHINGTON COUNTY 2001-108487 `AS t •' axation,Ex- •' IIII I II III 11111111111111111 lerk Rect: 2905798487 37.00 10/24/2001 02: 03: 11pm RESTRICTIVE COVENANT (FUTURE STREET IMPROVEMENTS) j1Ae6A THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this /L day of Fe y, 2001, by the City gf Tigard, a Municipal Corporation of Washington County, Oregon, ("CITY"), and -1447/7- ' >r jet. ,4-frr, a corporation authorized to do business in the State of Oregon, ("OWNER"). RECITALS WHEREAS OWNER is the Owner of record of Property covered by this Agreement as shown in Section 1 below, and WHEREAS OWNER has received approval of a development on the Property from the CITY, as set forth in MLP 2000-00005 dated August 28, 2000, and WHEREAS Chapter 18.810 of the TMC (Tigard Municipal Code) contains certain conditions applicable to street improvements, and issuance of permits is conditioned on OWNER'S compliance with the TMC, and WHEREAS OWNER wishes to mitigate the impacts of the proposed development, and WHEREAS parties wish to fulfill the requirements of Chapter 18.810. IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual promises, convenants and undertakings, and the issuance of a building permit in advance of OWNER constructing improvements required by the TMC, the parties agree as follows: Section 1: The real property subject to this Agreement is described as follows: P A AT 1 7/4N PLAT i1/d. 2001-068 OWNER agrees that the terms of this Agreement shall bind the OWNER as well as its heirs, successors in interest or assigns. • Section 2: The improvements covered by this Agreement are as follows: SW Inez Street • Restrictive Covenant (Future Street Improvements) Page 1 of 4 Revision date:1/1/01 / • • Half street improvement to a local residential street standard to include pavement widening to provide a total of 16 feet from centerline to curb, concrete curb, concrete sidewalk, street trees, streetlights, storm drainage and underground utilities. Section 3: This Agreement shall be in full force and effect from the date of its execution until the improvements referred to in Section 2 are constructed in accordance with CITY standards in effect at the time of construction. Section 4: CITY agrees that the improvements listed in Section 2 will only be required as a result of any one of the following events: (1) when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the formation of a Local Improvement District, (2) when the improvements are part of a larger public project to be financed or paid for in whole or in part by CITY or other public agency, (3) when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and involves the sharing of design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s) of property in addition to the property described in Section 1, or (4) when construction of the improvements are deemed to be appropriate by the City Engineer in conjunction with construction of improvements by others adjacent to the improvements described in Section 2. In addition to this Agreement, OWNER'S obligation to share design and/or construction expenses may arise by application of the Reimbursement District Ordinance; Chapter 13.09, TMC, or any similar ordinance or law providing a process whereby such expenses are distributed among benefited properties. Section 5: OWNER agrees to sign any and all waivers, petitions, consents and all other documents necessary to obtain the above listed applicable improvements under any improvement act or proceeding of the State of Oregon, Washington County, or the CITY as may be proposed or adopted and to waive all right to remonstrate against the improvements listed in Section 2 above, submitted either alone or in conjunction with other improvements described in Section 4, as may be proposed. OWNER agrees that in lieu of any other document, CITY may treat this Agreement as a waiver of remonstrance on behalf of the property described in Section 1 against formation of such a Local Improvement District. OWNER covenants and agrees that the improvements described in Section 2 will specially benefit OWNER'S property as described in Section 1. Section 6: If CITY decides to form a Local Improvement District as a mechanism for the installation of improvements listed in Section 2, then OWNER shall retain the right to protest only the amount or the manner of spreading the assessment, but not the formation of such district. Section 7: CITY acknowledges that OWNER'S execution and performance of the terms of this Agreement constitutes compliance with the requirements of TMC Chapter 18.810. Section 8: OWNER agrees that if CITY causes the improvements listed in Section 2 to be constructed, or part of such improvements without regard to the source of funds for such project, but not as part of a Local Improvement District, then CITY will charge to OWNER and OWNER will promptly pay OWNER'S share of the cost of such improvements. OWNER'S share will be determined by CITY in a manner similar to spreading the cost of a public improvement to specially benefited properties. The parties intend OWNER to share Restrictive Covenant (Future Street Improvements) Page 2 of 4 Revision date: 111/01 . . . • • in the cost of improvements even though actual construction is undertaken and performed by some third party, so long as the improvements, listed in Section 2, are included within the project. • (1) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (2) of this section, prior to construction of such improvements under this section, OWNER shall be provided not less than six (6) months written notice by first class mail that the project will be built. The notice shall advise OWNER that OWNER will share in the cost of such improvements and provide OWNER with an estimate of the total project cost as well as an estimate of OWNER'S share of the costs. Failure to provide this "six month" notice in advance of construction shall not nullify OWNER'S obligation to pay, but shall only extend the payment due date by the amount of time less than six months that notice was given, but not more than six months. Upon completion of improvements pursuant to this Section, CITY shall provide written notice to OWNER of OWNER'S share of the actual cost of the improvements and OWNER shall pay OWNER'S share within sixty (60) days. If OWNER's share of the cost of the improvements is $10,000 or more, the owner may elect to pay the City in 10 equal annual installments, with the first installment due within 60 days of the notice. The installment option shall be available only if the OWNER provides written notice and the first payment within 60 days of the notice. If the installment option is chosen, the unpaid amounts shall bear interest at the then legal rate of interest. Interest on overdue payments shall bear interest at the rate of one and one-half(1 %2%) per month from the date the payment is due until paid. (2) Where the improvements listed in Section 2 are constructed by a third party, who seeks reimbursement in accordance with the Reimbursement District Ordinance, Chapter 13.09, TMC, or a similar ordinance, then the terms and procedures of the ordinances shall apply in lieu of the provisions in subsection (1) of this section. Section 9: At any time prior to the events listed in Section 4, OWNER or OWNER's successors may pay to the CITY an amount determined by the CITY to be OWNER's share of the anticipated cost of the future improvements. Payment under this section shall discharge all of OWNER's obligations under this Agreement. City shall use the funds received under this section solely to pay for the costs of the improvements. Section 10: CITY and OWNER intend that all terms of this Agreement shall be covenants, conditions, and restrictions running with the title to the property covered by this Agreement, and shall be binding upon parties to this Agreement, their heirs, executors, assigns, administrators, and successors and shall be construed to be a benefit and a burden upon the property described in Section 1. The parties agree the CITY may, for purposes of recovering the cost of improvements described in Section 2, levy an assessment against the property, described in Section 1, and may enforce payment of such assessment in the manner provided in ORS Chapter 223 or the general laws of the State of Oregon. Section 11: Promptly after its execution by the parties, this Agreement shall be recorded in the records of Washington County to provide public notice and especially notice to future owners of property, described in Section 1 of the conditions, covenants and restrictions against the title to the property imposed by this Agreement. Section 12: CITY may enforce the terms of this Agreement in any court of competent jurisdiction. In addition to any other legal remedies, OWNER'S failure or refusal to comply with this Restrictive Covenant (Future Street Improvements) 3 Page 3 of 4 Revision date: 1/1/01 • • • • Agreement shall constitute a violation of the TMC and the rights, remedies, and penalties provided in the TMC may also be enforced. Section 13: If suit or action is instituted to enforce a right guaranteed in this agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to, in addition to the statutory costs and disbursements, a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the trial and appellate courts respectively. Section 14: The parties agree that if any term of provision of this agreement is declared by a court to be illegal or in conflict with any law, the validity of the remaining terms and provisions shall not be affected, so long as this agreement continues to reflect the intent of the parties. The parties shall negotiate an equitable adjustment of this agreement so that the purposes of this agreement are effected. OW ER(S): N, /2 . A'''. • _v ii - — _ �� te ► t %gnat e Signature Pi. ` �� — ��Ol E"1 �ZiM tC1 Name(Print or Type) Name (Print or Type) Title (Print or Type) Title (Print or Type) Acknowledgment of OWNER'S signature(s) must be notarized. Where the OWNER is a corporation, it has caused its name to be signed by resolution or official approval of its board of directors. STATE OF OREGON ) County of lA.J,'1-6rf yai4TL U ) On this {2 day JY,212 , , before me a Notary Public, /i c fro 5c-.t,,i, r r ‘74-.-> X- S4.t-nT personally appeared and acknowledged that the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act and deed. Before me: / w--4 --1, - _f ±�,� OFFICIAL SEAL otary Public for Oregon .• BRUCE E WAL,SH ' � NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON / COMMISSION NO.308976 My commission expires: MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FEB,21,2002 z©o( Accepted on behalf of the City of Tigard this lbw` day of J 0 Li , . CIC.,.....123 e• Q.,.....„ City Engineer Restrictive Covenant (Future Street Improvements) Page 4 of 4 Revision date:1/1/01 411 �J LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE RECEIVED n� RECEIVED PLAMING JAN 1 r, 2002 (� CITY OF TIGARD TO: ea /wzA__ Ki): DEPT: FROM: l //'U ` diA/Yri Q PHONE NUMBER: U (�� 1/-1)56 /-5\ k\ICX.§4 RE: M/90e66 — (D 60,4" kii\c‘j \c (Case number, site address, parcel number, etc.) \g \\\ COMMENTS: / o - u - 0 i:dsts/forms/LetterTransmittal.do c March 8, 2001 A ,d `\ CITY OF TIGARD Troy Schmidt OREGON 10190 SW Inez Street Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Troy Schmidt: This letter is in response to the request to remove trees after the issuance of decision MLP2000-00005. The requested arborist assessment has been received. You are now approved to remove trees on the property at 10190 SW Inez Street. Thank you for your quick response to our requests. If you have any further questions, feel free to notify me at (503) 639-4171 extension 317. Sincerely, Pt.11117- Matt Schiedegger Assistant Planner • 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.(503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 Mar 08 01 02: 27p Trill M. Schmidt 503-443-2467 p. 1 • FROM : RICHS TREE SERUICE FAX NO. : 503 668 5230 Jun. 05 2000 09:16AM P2 • Hitt SIlk ti: - sl'ffE SWR�%`�` • • June 2;2000 Troy Schmidt - 10190 SW Inez Street • Tigard, Oregon 97224 To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed is the assessment for trees located at the address above. The trees are in construction conflict. If you have any questions,please contact my office at 668=5230 or my mobile phone at 348-8303. Sin • • y, / .. , /or, Jesse deVos General Foreman • ISA Certified Arborist • • • • • • • • • �D/ah . Enc. r . . • • 41281.SF Allpier RA,,SoMy,O:egan 91055,E.503/66 8-5130,W.503/230:8011 N ti - M d a up .pry I 1 Approx. PM,stOr.octt:at. • )t{ SPECIES DBH STRUC7l'RAI. AFST1tE rtc HEALTH RECCOMMENDATIONS .t N HEALTH VALUE N m i i m Remove due to inevitable root damage from driveway construction 4- 3 l 1 I Doug Fir 30.6" 9 9 9 On 0 to 1 Remove—tree is rapidly declining;evidence found of root decay; ri 2 Noble Fir 35.7" 2 4 1 inevitable root damage from driveway construction. N rl tri to 1 m Remove--tree will experience shock due to inevitable loss of .0 o 3 Ponderosa Pine 34.4" 8 6 9 oxygen and soil compaction to root system from driveway 'o construction. Root system will also be damaged. E U x I U U) t1 E . . S k. W iJ S. a Q. I N N w w N 1 O N .1 V O ry . c0 .. O L "1,,, E r / f • • NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2000-00005 CITY OF TIGARD SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION Community Development Shaping A Better Community 12QDAYS = 10/25/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2000-00005 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Minor Land Partition approval to partition one (1) existing lot of 22,549 square feet into two lots of 10,009 and 11,940 square feet with a 600 square foot dedication. APPLICANT: Corbin Shays/Urban Visions 2123 SE 12 Avenue Portland, OR 97214 OWNER: Troy Schmidt 10190 SW Inez Street Tigard, OR 97223 ZONING DESIGNATION: R-3.5; Low-Density Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. LOCATION: 10190 SW Inez Street; WCTM 2S111 BC, Tax Lot 02200. PROPOSED PARCEL 1: 10,009 Square Feet. PROPOSED PARCEL 2: 11,940 Square Feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390 (Decision-Making Procedures); 18.420 (Land Partitions); 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation); 18.715 (Density Computations); 18.790 (Tree Removal); 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions•on which the decision is based are noted in Section V. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION PAGE 1 OF 12 / • • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PARTITION PLAT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: Submit the following to the Planning Department (Mathew Scheidegger 639-4171 x317) for review and approval: 1. Provide evidence that the tree located in the visual clearance area will be maintained to a height no less then 8 feet. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 2. A Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the sanitary sewer tap, driveway approach for Parcel 2 and any other work in the public right-of-way. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 3. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 4. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30.00. 5. The final plat shall indicate a right-of-way dedication on SW Inez Street to provide 25 feet from • centerline. 6. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall enter into a Street Improvement Agreement with the City whereby they agree to complete or participate in the future improvements of SW Inez Street adjacent to the subject property, when any of the following events occur: A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the formation of a Local Improvement District, B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for in whole or in part by the City or other public agency, • C. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and involves the sharing of design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s) of property in addition to the subject property, or 7. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate by the City Engineer in conjunction with construction of improvements by others adjacent to the subject site. 8. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall submit a formal storm drainage design for Parcel 2. If an infiltration system is proposed, as shown in the applicant's materials, then the applicant shall also provide a back-up pump system that would pump any overflow stormwater out to the public storm drainage system in.SW 103rd Avenue. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION PAGE 2 OF 12 • • 9. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Inez Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 3,300.00 and it shall be paid prior to approval of the final plat. 10. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. 11: Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. C. The right-of-way dedication for SW Inez Street shall be made on the final plat. D. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive a letter from the City Engineering Department indicating: 1) that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor, and 2) that the applicant has either completed any public improvements associated with the project, or has at least obtained the necessary public improvement permit from the City to complete the work. E. Once the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer's signature. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED . PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 12. The applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a mylar copy of the recorded final plat: 13. Prior to issuance of the building permit for Parcel 2, the applicant shall pay the standard water quality fee per lot (fee amount will be the latest approved by USA). 14. Prior to issuance of the building permit for Parcel 2, the applicant shall pay the standard water quantity fee per lot (fee amount will be the latest approved by USA). THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION NOTED UNDER THE PROCESS AND APPEAL SECTION OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHMI DT-I NEZ PARTITION PAGE 3 OF 12 • • Property History: The subject parcel is located within the City of Tigard. The property is designated Low Density Residential on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map. A previous Land Partition was applied for in 199 The file was closed due to the applicant's selling the property and not responding to incomplete submittal letters. No other land-use approvals were found to be on file in the City's records. Site Information and Proposal Descriptions The subject property is approximately 22,549 square feet. The site has approximately 120 feet of frontage on SW Inez Street. The owner is proposing a two-parcel partition as indicated on the proposed partition plat. Parcel #1 (10,009 square feet) and Parcel #2 (11,940 square feet). A residential structure exists on Parcel #1. SECTION IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS The City mailed notice to property owners within 500 feet of the subject site providing them an opportunity to comment. One (1) letter was received addressing the land partition. The concerns in the response addressed surface water runoff. • Staff Response: Refer to the "Storm Drainage" section of Public Facility Concerns located on page 8. SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Land Partitions (18.420): The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; The proposed partition will comply with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations at the time of proposed development as demonstrated both by the analysis presented within this administrative decision and by this application and review process through compliance with the conditions of approval. Therefore, this criterion is met. There are adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal; Public facilities are discussed in detail later in this decision. Based on the analysis provided herein, staff finds that adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal. Therefore, this criterion is met. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards; and The public facilities and proposed improvements are discussed and conditioned later in this decision. Improvements will be reviewed as part of the permit process and during construction at which time the appropriate review authority will insure that City and applicable agency standards are met. Based on the analysis in this decision, staff finds that this criterion is met. All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below: The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. The minimum lot width required for the R-3.5 zoning district is 65 feet. Both lots have a width of 120 feet. Therefore, this standard has been met. The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area. The minimum lot area requirement in the R-3.5 zoning district is 10,000 square feet. The proposed NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION PAGE 4 OF 12 • • • • partition creates two lots that are 10,009 and 11,940 square feet respectively. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The proposed partition plat demonstrates that both lots will have frontage onto a public right-of-way. Parcel #1 has 104 feet of frontage onto SW Inez Street and Parcel #2 has 15 feet of frontage on SW Inez Street. Therefore, this cntenon is satisfied. Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. No development is proposed with this application. The existing dwelling on Parcel #1 will not be in violation of applicable setbacks. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. The newly created lot will be a flag lot. According to the applicant, the flag lot will have the front of the dwelling oriented west. There will be a minimum of 10-foot setbacks on both sides. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. The applicant proposes to screen the newly created access drive to parcel 2 with existing fir trees along the west boundary of the access drive. Therefore, this standard has been met. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities. Fire district regulations are reviewed at time of development. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. No common drive is associated with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation. The applicant has proposed a 20-foot-wide access that has 10 feet of pavement. The plans show a 15-foot-wide access. According to Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation) the minimum requirement for residential zones is (1) access that is 15 feet wide with 10 feet of pavement. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred-year floodplain, the city shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. The partitioned lot is not adjacent to a one-hundred-year floodplain. Therefore, this standard does not apply. An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in accordance with Chapter 18.370, Variances and Adjustments. The applications for the partition NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION PAGE 5 OF 12 • • . • and variance(s)/adjustment(s) will be processed concurrently. No variances or adjustments have been submitted with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Land Partition standards have been met. Residential Zoning Districts (18.510): Development standards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2 below: TABLE 18.510.2 - (Cont'd.) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES STANDARD R-7 Parcel#1 Parcel#2 Minimum Lot Size -Detached unit 10,000 sq.ft. <10,000 sq.ft. <10,000 ft. -Duplexes -Attached unit[1] Average Minimum Lot Width -Detached unit lots 65 ft. 120 ft. 120 ft. -Duplex lots 90 ft. -Attached unit lots Maximum Lot Coverage - - - Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 20 ft. 30 ft. - -Side facing street on corner&through lots 15 ft. - - -Side yard 5 ft. 12 ft. - -Rear yard 15 ft. 36 ft. - -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district -Distance between property line and front of garage 20 ft. <20 ft. - Maximum Height 30 ft. >30 ft. - Minimum Landscape Requirement - - - [1]Single-family attached residential units permitted at one dwelling per lot with no more that five attached units in one grouping. [2]Lot coverage includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. • Multiple-family dwelling unit • Single-family dwelling unit • Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access, Egress, and Circulation have been discussed earlier in this decision. Therefore, the criterion has been met. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION PAGE 6 OF 12 • • • Density Computations (18.715): The standards for Density computation deal with the intensity of residential land uses, usually stated as the number of housing units per acre. The total square footage of the subject property is 22,549 square feet. The minimum density for this property is (1) unit; the maximum density is (2) units. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Density Computation Standards have been met. Tree Removal (18.790): A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot,,, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. The applicant has not proposed to remove any trees as a result of this partition. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the tree removal standards have been met. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): This Chapter requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property i adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually.clear between three (3) and eight 8 feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight 8 feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a -foot distance points with a straight line. No obstructions have been proposed where the existing access connects to SW Inez Street. There is an existing 6-inch diameter Conifer Tree on the west side of the new access drive. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide evidence that the tree will be trimmed to a height no less than eight feet in order to satisfy the visual clearance standards. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the Vision Clearance Standards have not been met. If the applicant meets the condition below, the standards will be satisfied. CONDITION: Provide evidence that the tree located in the visual clearance area will be maintained to a height no less then 8 feet in height. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a local residential street to have a 50-foot right-of-way width and a 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION PAGE 7 OF 12 • . This site lies adjacent to SW Inez Street, which is classified as a local residential street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 20 feet of ROW south of the centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate additional ROW to provide 25 feet from the centerline. The applicant's materials indicate they will provide the dedication on the final plat. SW Inez Street is paved but not fully improved to City standards. TMC 18.810.030(A)(1) states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with City standards. However, 18.810.030(A)(4) states that the City may accept a future improvement guarantee in lieu of street improvements if the improvement associated with the project does not, by itself, provide a significant improvement to the street safety or capacity. Although this development will incrementally increase the amount of traffic on the roadway, the increase will not substantially degrade the level of service on the street. A street improvement adjacent to this site, therefore, will not significantly improve the safety or capacity of the street. In addition, 18.810.030(A)(1)(e) states that a guarantee in lieu of street improvements is acceptable if the proposal is a land partition on property zoned residential and the partition does not create any new streets. This partition will not create a new street. Based on these code provisions, Staff therefore recommends that the applicant be required to enter into an agreement with the City whereby the owner agrees to participate in any future widening project for the street carried out by the City, a third party, or through a local improvement district. This agreement must be executed prior to approval of the final plat. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. By executing the future improvement agreement for SW Inez Street, the applicant will satisfy this criteria. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line located in SW Inez Street that can serve this site. The applicant intends to tap the main line and extend a new service lateral to Parcel 2. The existing house on Parcel 1 is presently served by the public sewer. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility.shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There will not be a public storm drainage system within this project. Therefore, this criteria does not apply. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHM I DT-INEZ PARTITION PAGE 8 OF 12 • • Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan indicates two options for disposal of stormwater from Parcel 2. One option is to install a drywell or soakage trench, where the stormwater would infiltrate into the soil. The other option is to obtain a private offsite storm drainage easement and pump the onsite stormwater westerly to the existing public storm drainage pipe in SW 103' Avenue. Staff spoke with the Building Division regarding these options. Drywells and other infiltration systems are of a concern in Tigard, because they have a tendency of filling up during the winter and overflowing. The Building Division stated that if such a system were proposed, they would require the builder to install a pump system V em as a back-up incase the infiltration system overflowed. The pump would need to pump the water out to the public system; in this case, the water would have to be pumped to the existing public system in SW 103rd Avenue. In light of the fact that both options will require a pump, Staff recommends the applicant simply pump the storm water out to SW 103 Avenue and not install an infiltration system. Alternatively, the applicant could present another option that would have to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the Building Division. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeway is proposed or required with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. No bikeway is associated with this project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. No bikeway is proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHMI DT-I NEZ PARTITION PAGE 9 OF 12 • • Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Inez Street. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 120 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $3,300. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site can be served from the existing public water line located in SW Inez Street. The applicant's plan indicates they will apply for a new water service to serve the new house on Parcel 2. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water qua ity facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The USA standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such as residential land partitions. It would be impractical to require an on-site water quality facility to accommodate treatment of the storm water from Parcel 2. Rather, the USA standards provide that applicants should pay a fee in-lieu of constructing a facility if deemed appropriate. Staff recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on this application. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Building Division may require a grading and erosion control plan when Parcel 2 is developed. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final plat. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. Survey Requirements The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the .scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHM I DT-I NEZ PARTITION PAGE 10 OF 12 • • • • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. City of Tigard Utility Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency comments have been discussed above under Public facility concerns. Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue has reviewed the proposal and offered the following statements: 1. The access lane to lot 2 shall have an all-weather, minimum 15-foot clear and unobstructed driving surface and shall be capable of supporting a 50,000 lb. Load. 2. A fire hydrant shall be located no more than 500 feet from the house on lot 2. 3. The fire hydrant shall be capable of providing a minimum fire flow of 1,000 gpm @ 20 psi. Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 14, 2000 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 29, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION PAGE 11 OF 12 • • - Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 28, 2000. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. � - : - _� — August 14. 2000 PREPARED : : ath-' cheidegg: DATE Assistant Planner August 14. 2000 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersc •rff-"44- DATE Planning Manager I/curpin/mathew/mlp/mIp2000-00005.dec NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION PAGE 12 OF 12 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ! ' al."ar CITY OR name') .AY' APPLICANT: TROY SCHMIDT 10190 S.W.INEZ STREET, . TIGARD OR 97224 519-5420 O1A`a ASPHAL3 \ 10'w"�� REPRESENTATIVE: URBAN VISIONS DOSEWAT I wnlcwAr CULKAT 2123 S.E. 12TH AVENUE CV COP ,` /� EOP S.W. INEZ STREET SUITE 2 El.101.64 _>_/pLANITARY WANHOtE Li.99..0 PILO. OR 97214 Ii ` -1 t CONTACT: CORBIN EOP I / 797-9567 O FL.101.41 WA1EA FOP N '�..r,-,7_ r.P., ____I. - EL 9930 LOCATION: 10190 S.W. INEZ STREET 6• WAT • MAT m¢ .,. ,::,89"S....., 11U.UU` ��S, cumuli "rJ STATE ID:R0502325 EO 3/4•IP -naligli • .• EL 101.12 .,0 ::■.;-: '1 105.0 'AW r ZONE:R-3.5(14000 S.F.LOTS) -.5=: ,.",:,*-7.....c. .-s e:: - s , 5.0' N10E �-'yy�';+: "��!,•;�� - RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSAL 2 LOT PARTITION WITH NO VARIANCES.EXISTING • ^:` `':'- ggr`' ''' - g - DEDICATION DWELUNG WILL REMAIN. • 46 :a") \ ,`.�.,4'. \?44'1'..�e .. // 9�-r 1\'., AREA 600 S.F. ,114'. :a•: SANITARY: PARCEL 1 CONNECTED TO PUBLIC SANITARY psr `;�y^<<:.;,...1.--': _-_-__'1 j io PARCEL 2 TO BE CONNECTED TO PUBUC SANITARY i .aa ...JJJ VI I El0 * r= WATER: PARCEL 1 CONNECTED TO PUBLIC WATER EE . ;yam PARCEL 2 TO BE CONNECTED TO PUBUC'WATER ml , ;%v4i4:,j� I Nous I 2 STORM: PARCEL 1 DRAINS TO FLASH BLOCK SYSTEM �� / ;,'k,_4,-, n PARCEL 2 TO DRAIN TO SOAKAGE TRENCH OR . ' _ COI , "' ;,.'_ I I ,- WILL BE PUMPED TO PUBLIC STORM LINE IN S.W. 113TH 60 d' I 3 1. I _ - SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN \� °°"'° _J DENSITY 4P• otcA LANDSCAPE PLAN: CALCS: OVERALL SITE AREA: 22,548 S.F. p('' �� I i I I I i _ -NO TREES TO BE REMOVED �rI -EXISTING TREES TO BE PROTECTED WITH . DEDICATION AREA: 600 S.F. . t103 439 , J e 7 `� "- 17.1 PARCEL 1 AREA: 10,009 S.F. Yp37�1 \ - 'o I P!o• PARCEL 1 I CONSTRUCTION FENCING AT PLANTING DRIPUNE PARCEL 2 AREA 11,940 S.F. / \- m .. �q/AREA.10,009 Si. /- 1 '\ - THERE IS NO PROPOSED PLANTING WITH PARCEL 2 AREA • / I y •• THIS PARTITION �) -NO IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS REQUIRED LESS ACCESS POLE AREA): 10,507 S.F. • .,',.,:742 r rjj'? �♦ y +• 1 •/i''. \ C •6 -THERE WILL BE NO GRADING OR STOCKPIUNG • fij}�F a�' 1��tie7>~a'�YP y` T 9 G7D1'00 E 105.00' 1y / OF TOPSOIL SOME INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON -NO SOIL TREATMENT IS REQUIRED SUPPLIED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER 9 LV.bLI 'µ A I / Oq>f s'°‘ PUBUC IMPROVMENTS/STREET PLAN: NO CONTOURS; APPROXIMATE 5%GRADE•1:171:1 Ir�'v PATIRC'T.Ftwp_-4n11D-1 W y 1 ♦-{Pr} rv� VT1a•I PARCEL 2 1 6� -NO HALF STREET IMPROVUENTS ARE PROPOSED t 1i r A. 1W l 6 :T aUSrtn ARCM 11.ti4US.,• I / t rF , +'+ n- AREA.10,507 U.wn10UT r' POLE -q . GRADING/EROSION CONTROL PLAN: � s, i;c ,.. Y)• -GRADING NiLL BE LIMITED TO SOIL RE-DISTRIBUTION Lo)4 3>\f pr' 4 C'_T ,V 1 TO ACHIEVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM FOUNDATION. I,,,. ,13.. a I 0 CU1 n THERE WILL BE NO GRADING ON THE SITE GREATER THAN 4 INCHES. S>'-••�is Ly f?� A. Zvi Z I 1 1n �`` b ,A /;k�IL*� L' T"" MV v W' I •K 7 - EROSION CONTROL FENCING WILL SURROUND CONSTRUCTION AREA. <N> AB941 G%'1L t ��re L is I I T^'� R- GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WILL BE UTILIZED. 111M/•43..x, C'Cljr.?�C�,I�,y* ,,t -. - \ �y� n TREE PRESERVATION PLAN: - EXISTING TREES TO BE PROTECTED WITH CONSTRUCTION•• F1, ,,A.,T� ,.,:�-,/11.6•j ITFT A I \ - - Ai FENCING AT DRIPUNE. . .,..,, , A, .fit ;1614 `�'4r>.t , �I / X �$ VICINITY MAP ' b >r $b 1 , TENTATIVE PLAN TAX LOT 2200, 2S 1W 1160 NOT TO SCALE _ •10 VCe i 7/ ---v-.-•1,3. _ `•e . ram 3/4'e -a IT \a�] fp�L/'��{, TT / 'v�1q/y1� , ..\� a,fO 3,40,, N.W.J,�4 SEC. 11, T.2S., RAW, W.M. —SAN— — 00A0—/ 1I\ \ Tn "�• )-717I�/%EL,60A1_Sµ_ L��J6AmINIII/MA — —.— fD 91.40 CITY OF TIGARD III < ) n-m.4o 4) WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON �� JANUARY 26, 2000 '' Centerline Concepts Inc. �G DRAWN BY:MPW CHECKED BY: WGDIII QP SCALE 1`-30' ACCOUNT #150-3726 640 02nd Drive aodslon., Oregon 97027 M:\BND\SCHMIDT3728\SCHMIDTSC 503 650-0188 too 503 650-0189 T SCHMIDT INEZ PARTITION CITY of TIGARD . SITE PLAN N MLP2000-00005 • .(Map is not to scale) • _ IIIP • CI Yof • JANZEN Fl R• E GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM OT aI VICINITY MAP d SCHMIDiNEZ � _______ rn4 PARTITION - £1 ill Il I _ ~ MLP2000-00005 ■m • TEFR VIEW TERR II; INF7 ST . • , i■ : : : k, :::„\:\\ , . _ , I f� {-1 SUBJECT SIT I w PEMBROOK ST - Q 11 III • I I I [ [T N , _________F_______,/ R CK ST , 0 100 200 300 400 Feet 1'=301 feet I- � D A. B o I > ,:i, rl i!� 8 City of Tigard j 1 0 ` Information on this map is for general location only and OD DELMONTE DR ,� should be verified with 312 SW H all B vdt Services Division. • CO 0 Tigard,OR 97223 ®1111 m m w • (503)639.4171 > — httpi/www.ci.tigard.or.us L 1 I I -- Plot date:Jul 3,2000;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR Community Development • NOTICE OF TYPE II 'DECISION ND PARTITION (MLP) 2000'-0:000.5. 'r��s �'� � c 4CITY Of TIOARD; i Communiy Deveop SCH ROTA PARTITION ent > 120 DAYS = 10/25/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2000-00005 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Minor Land Partition approval to partition one (1) existing lot of 22,549 square feet into two lots of 10,009 and 11,940 square feet with a 600 square foot dedication. APPLICANT: Corbin Shags/Urban Visions 2123 SE 12 Avenue Portland, OR 97214 OWNER: Troy Schmidt 10190 SW Inez Street Tigard, OR 97223 ZONING DESIGNATION: R-3.5; Low-Density Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. LOCATION: 10190 SW Inez Street; WCTM 2S111 BC, Tax Lot 02200. PROPOSED PARCEL 1: 10,009 Square Feet. PROPOSED PARCEL 2: 11,940 Square Feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390 (Decision-Making Procedures); 18.420 (Land Partitions); 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation); 18.715 (Density Computations); 18.790 (Tree Removal); 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). SECTION II. DECISION Noticer is. hereb Y 'g iven:-thaA the: Ci tY • D e v a l oa pment APPROVED the-:above'reqes �Director,'ks.3 .�•desig n:ee u °has subjec't:to`'ceitain conditions of a� =�roval :``The fndin sand conclusions: on,which,the:decision is basedYare`notedink,the.Full'Decision located''at Cit ,,H All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice; Notice mailed to: • X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 14, 2000 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 29, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. A al: 0 41 Vector's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Community Development Code Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Community Development Code Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment'period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. • ITHE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 28, 2000. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT'DEPARTMENT A;;. • • ... ..-I APPUCANT:TROY S00301 mso sw.wn 6411Et. nGARO 20 nnA 1__ f 516a420 Imo^ \ xr m REPRESENTATIVE:0060+wpd5 N �-.'•�.'..� 212]S[.120 AKJNC . S.W. INEZ STREET WTI 2 O''—r—= .01x/1..6 une nD.011 net. R — — _ 000001:06+010 .4.100 W s 297-0567 or MOO 11 .0 —L•4• —_ 1'■ N °.,,, I 1 . AM•r 0A,PI _or— LOCAPOD Iota s.w.w[Z smur n y y•• 1 1 ,!:,,,;;;%.1,,'.1 1 , STATE ID:80302720 n.w.'. '.`h10'''s 1 ' 2DNE:a-}6(10.000 Sr.Ln0) 5.0010E yy'�i,., - 6001 a MY PROPOSAL 2..PAann00 rM xo vARiARas Ex3140 •�,� OEOGTgx ow4uNC YNL awAM. ,,,W N jT::L ?.t /a\,;..,1\•- AREA 6ao sr. mat t caN[crzo ro 01600 SO*O RO t 8 =w__, SANITARY:n LEL 2 C O[mxx[ctm 00 00100 s10aTARY 11' 00" ++ WATER:Porn t 06x[01[0 ro 01000 w.rzn I rn2ro°C TM[CZ ro:u=w.. .i rl Ilos I 1 P STORM:PARCEL 1 001000 10 11040 6L00f 5YS1Cx I I PARCEL 2 TO WAN TO SOAKAGE TRENCH OR • • al ,' I I __�� ' SUP�IEYERTAL PLAN 15416 O.11010 TO Kale STORx UNE DENSITY ::r I` m'_Ir1� —jxY • :,, I 1 as -o mi[s ec OCUOISO OSLO. 000000 1 (0 AREA.6 0.10,sr. -[XISrMC TRm ro eE PRarzcrzW rM S� lib. PARCEL 1 1 cox0136.4 {410x0 AT OWPIINE PARCEL 1 ARfA 14000 SS. 1 / _ _1XEPE a x0 PaOP05ED PAx1W0 rM PARCEL 2 AREA:03.10 5.r. �I -' ........td L �. / 101 0/.111106 vARrn 2 Aa[A [ 7''..].iN•`r `.: ..�� NO"TAI!I:r a 0EO0aED LESO ACCESS POLL AREA}.10.002 SC lLS F - -1NGL S00 B[wo Or000 Tr ft. f ' E t'nr�r •wrxYE 106°0• / d TOMS SUPPLIED W I 10100000(1 00110 SONE P] 1 SCE J'�k! - -NO s°0.TREATNNi a REWIRED SUPPLIED BY 111E PROPERTY°0041 ' 5.IS I �1� E,'i W 0 ♦P •L''-f t{!3. E L I o1 �K 1o�TR��r No[ONTOxRS APPROXIMATE°s GRADE f �f 6'1 - 0 NWI 518[01 OP110'Am1R ARE PROPOSED L �,Y- � 1 w^( y7' 44/v—---.--- _♦ °ugNaAOP° ai°Misa�ro'sca u-0011060101 Ity,Ff\> is 0I1 c f0.`,'. C ..Ra R�-T ro AauILL roaO G auoua 1ME W MATER WAN rnI i ATk ]. _ I I' ' -5 YELL CONTROL 000 aTNC511[ D$241110 11 AK ' `/� L r f 1 1 Fmri s f III i T'- aO11sa°90N�nsi10l000 aruxa rR x°ru41u 1RU010N AKA �` ,� 11 f TEL'Lt( �Y, 1f? 'v t ":i, %e V 1aEC PRESERINCU T PINw [XISG 0 110[0 ro BC PIOrzCnD rM c000raucml �.y 2,.`�,1. •,a;;�glu:i't vlF I. _ 'i .' ^ MORO AT ONPL06L _ a /:�.enP, 00{01. = I p kABbiA _ TO CU •3 "i T �p!p1 ►_ '1, a TENTATIVE PLAN TAX LOT 2200, 2S 1W 11BC• P Y.ti .'r Z'••• ..12000E I�'rnm_yw__ N.W. ♦SEG 11 1.25..0.106.WY. I6'4: - COY TIGARD III WASHINGTON COUNTY.OREGON �,� JANUARY2R.2000' CanterlIne Concepts Inc. �pC.S' DRAWN$g10 0006 001Ep p BY:wcwq Qr SCALE 1-]d ACCOUNY/150-5126 sw nw Dd.0w.l..•.,o.vw.61021 M:\BNO\SOY01nu\s00POTSC • 006 600.0110 IS.500 650-0100 CITY OF TIGARD SCHMIDT INEZ PARTITION • SITE PLAN N MLP2000-00005 (Map is not to scale) HH ' O� --'--; H 6� �` l� VICINITY MAP \i �_ i I i _. I 1 II -1 II SCHMIDNNEZ I r--"7 1 `" PARTITION • . I i 1-- -- --t I I I a1 I ¢1111111_ '`" ~ — MLP2000-00005 • I LI i-- I I I "I ��—J I 1 ' VIENTFRR `—H I-~ •I TEA. 1 I 11 1 I i I I 11111 I 11 11111 _ I 1 . • 111111 INF7 ST . CANTERS Y LAI I MU I —I I 1�l l T SUBJECT SI - PFJABROOK ST i � i l . 1 • f A IRS —1AUR eT I N .— ,�8 FF_�'RRAA.:. 1 II ciaDf,yM6 CO L___ OE4.MONTE]R 1 I ..r. »a:.^.r'.a:■ Ffitli3 fit II f �r rw.A•ma .. 1 -- I 1- 1 I 1--7� I I- 7— g _ l .,.W::1._-_ . . NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOER,VENDOR OR SELLER: • THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION l'12 MINOR LAND PARTITION CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: July 3, 2000 FILE NUMBER: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2000-00005 FILE NAME: SCHMIDT INEZ PARTITION PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting to partition one existing lot of 22,548 square feet into two lots of 10,009 and 11,940 square feet with a 600 sq. foot dedication. ZONE: R-3.5: Low—Density Residential District, The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18. 390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, 18.810. LOCATION: 10190 SW Inez Street; WCTM 2S111 BC, Tax Lot 02200. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON JULY 18, 2000. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheidegger. Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST 10, 2000. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the bat for an appeal to the Tigard Planning•mmission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. • The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. • City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." i I c_ V' a VICINITY MAP j xi SCHMIDT INEZ ' 1 I ri� PARTITION 1 (, I m lI MLP2000-00005 � - I rni > ■ ,a. TEFR — i i _ .. I ■ 4 l SUBJECT SITEI —�- _1 1 �i I I P_EMBROOK_ST I i _' __L_ 1 I i Ii il C� _ n 'l 1 -- i---- N i w� �OC{ I -� ST I Ea s Q hi ;= ;ye.ih I W , ___ City of Tigard I m L I DELMOKE.DR - SW.183.4 i ¢ :,:. �'T' mr=r I 7 III H I �o13031e417I —_ REQUEST ER (kMi %JTs 07/18/2000 16: 56 5036842787 • WILDER DEVELOPMENT C PAGE 01 • • Juno e-mail printed Tue. 18 Jul 2000 17:02:06 , page 1 From:wilderclassics Full-Name: Randy A.Wilder To: mattr©ci.tigard.or.us X-Status: New Mr. Scheidegger, This letter is in reference to the Schmidt Inez Partition. After a discussion with Brian in regards to the surface water of the proposed new residence, I have a concern about having the surface water collected and deposited in a concentrated area. In the winter with heavy rains not only are there existing springs that percolate up, but also periodically water expels from the northern neighbors yard into mine. This will add to the already existing water flow in heavy rains. Thank You, Randy Wilder 14541 SW 100th Ave. Tigard,OR 97224 c7e• ?Lege- Se-461 a cop( - ael cry �n t4 "7/1 --X /1 f Matt Scheidegger- Schmidt Inez Pa .doc Page 1 TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE • SOUTH DIVISION COMMUNITY SERVICES • OPERATIONS • FIRE PREVENTION July 13, 2000 • Mathew Scheidegger, Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 're: Schmidt Inez Partition Dear Mathew, I have reviewed the submittal for the above named project and the following conditions apply: 1. The access lane to lot 2 shall have an all-weather, minimum 15 foot clear and unobstructed driving surface and shall be capable of supporting a 50,000 lb. load. 2. A fire hydrant shall be located no more than 500 feet from the house on lot 2. 3. The fire hydrant shall be capable of providing a minimum fire flow of 1,000 gpm @ 20 psi. Please contact me at (503) 612-7010 with any additional questions. Sincerely, Eric T. McMullen Eric T. McMullen Deputy Fire Marshal 7401 SW Washo Court•Tualatin,Oregon 97062•Phone:-503-612-7000 • Faz:503-612-7003•www.tvfr.com JUL-12 00 11:09 FROM:WASHCO LAND DEL) SERU 503-681-2908 TO:503 684 7297 PAGE:01'01 1111 • AINWASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON Department of Land Use and Transportation.Land Development Services IV 155 North.6 First Avenue,Suite 350-13,HillsCoro,Oregon 97124 ( (503))84.6-8761 •FAX;(503)846-2908 July 12, 2000 Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner . City of Tigard Community Development 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 FAX: 684-7297 # of Pages: 1 RE: Schmidt Inez Partition City File Number: MLP 2000-00005 Tax Map and Lot Number: 2S1 11BC 2200 Location: 10190 SW Inez Street Applicant: Troy Schmidt s t NM la 1 It ' 11.:1111111.1111 ■i l+ilk ■ Nig ow • m .11', Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation has reviewed the above noted development application but will not be submitting any requirements/conditions. The project site is not adjacent to County-maintained road sections, nor is it expected to generate considerable off-site impacts to our nearby roadways. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. If you have any questions, please contact me at 503-846-8131. oci,_(_., ‘11,4_, Anne LaMountain Associate Planner • F:IS h aredIDStwPSHAREITRAN S MIG1SchmidtNoCOMM.doc - • • MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: August 10, 2000 TO: Matt Scheidegger, Assistant Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: MLP 2000-00005, Schmidt Inez Partition Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a local residential street to have a 50-foot right-of-way width and a 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Inez Street, which is classified as a local residential street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 20 feet of ROW south of the centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate additional ROW to provide 25 feet from the centerline: The applicant's materials indicate they will provide the dedication on the final plat. SW Inez Street is paved but not fully improved to City standards. TMC 18.810.030(A)(1) states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with City standards. However, 18.810.030(A)(4) states that the City may accept a future improvement guarantee in lieu of street ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2000-00005 Schmidt Inez Partition PAGE 1 • • improvements if the improvement associated with the project does not, by itself, provide a significant improvement to the street safety or capacity. Although this development will incrementally increase the amount of traffic on the roadway, the increase will not substantially degrade the level of service on the street. A street improvement adjacent to this site, therefore, will not significantly improve the safety or capacity of the street. In addition, 18.810.030(A)(1)(e) states that a guarantee in lieu of street improvements is acceptable if the proposal is a land partition on property zoned residential and the partition does not create any new streets. This partition will not create a new street. Based on these code provisions, Staff therefore recommends that the applicant be required to enter into an agreement with the City whereby the owner agrees to participate in any future widening project for the street carried out by the City, a third party, or through a local improvement district. This agreement must be executed prior to approval of the final plat. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. By executing the future improvement agreement for SW Inez Street, the applicant will satisfy this criteria. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line located in SW Inez Street that can serve this site. The applicant intends to tap the main line and extend a new service lateral to Parcel 2. The existing house on Parcel 1 is presently served by the public sewer. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2000-00005 Schmidt Inez Partition PAGE 2 • • Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There will not be a public storm drainage system within this project. Therefore, this criteria does not apply. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan indicates two options for disposal of stormwater from Parcel 2. One option is to install a drywell or soakage trench, where the stormwater would infiltrate into the soil. The other option is to obtain a private offsite storm drainage easement and pump the onsite stormwater westerly to the existing public storm drainage pipe in SW 103rd Avenue. Staff spoke with the Building Division regarding these options. Drywells and other infiltration systems are of a concern in Tigard, because they have a tendency of filling up during the winter and overflowing. The Building Division stated that if such a system were proposed, they would require the builder to install a pump system as a back-up incase the infiltration system overflowed. The pump would need to pump the water out to the public system; in this case, ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2000-00005 Schmidt Inez Partition PAGE 3 • • the water would have to be pumped to the existing public system in SW 103`d Avenue. In light of the fact that both options will require a pump, Staff recommends the applicant simply pump the storm water out to SW 103`d Avenue and not install an infiltration system. Alternatively, the applicant could present another option that would have to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the Building Division. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be.conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication,lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2000-00005 Schmidt Inez Partition PAGE 4 • • • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- ' grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Inez Street. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 120 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $ 3,300.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site can be served from the existing public water line located in SW Inez Street. The applicant's plan indicates they will apply for a new water service to serve the new house on Parcel 2. Storm Water Quality: • The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2000-00005 Schmidt Inez Partition PAGE 5 • • frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The USA standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such as residential land partitions. It would be impractical to require an on-site water quality facility to accommodate treatment of the storm water from Parcel 2. Rather, the USA standards provide that applicants should pay a fee in-lieu of constructing a facility if deemed appropriate. Staff recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on this application. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Building Division may require a grading and erosion control plan when Parcel 2 is developed. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of$ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final plat. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. Survey Requirements The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2000-00005 Schmidt Inez Partition PAGE 6 • • Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: A Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the sanitary sewer tap, driveway approach for Parcel 2 and any other work in the public right-of-way. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. . Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30.00. The final plat shall indicate a right-of-way dedication on SW Inez Street to provide 25 feet from centerline. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall enter into a Street Improvement Agreement with the City whereby they agree to complete or participate in the future improvements of SW Inez Street adjacent to the subject property, when any of the following events occur: A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the formation of a Local Improvement District, B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for in whole or in part by the City or other public agency, C. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and involves the sharing of design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s) of property in addition to the subject property, or ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2000-00005 Schmidt Inez Partition PAGE 7 • • D. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate by the City Engineer in conjunction with construction of improvements by others adjacent to the subject site. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall submit a formal storm drainage design for Parcel 2. If an infiltration system is proposed, as shown in the applicant's materials, then the applicant shall also provide a back-up pump system that would pump any overflow stormwater out to the public storm drainage system in SW 103`d Avenue. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Inez Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in- lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 3,300.00 and it shall be paid prior to approval of the final plat. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. C. The right-of-way dedication for SW Inez Street shall be made on the final plat. D. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive a letter from the City Engineering Department indicating: 1) that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor, and 2) that the applicant has either completed any public improvements associated with the project, or has at least obtained the necessary public improvement permit from the City to complete the work. ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2000-00005 Schmidt Inez Partition PAGE 8 • • E. Once the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer's signature. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: • Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: The applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a mylar copy of the recorded final plat. Prior to issuance of the building permit for Parcel 2, the applicant shall pay the standard water quality fee per lot (fee amount will be the latest approved by USA). Prior to issuance of the building permit for Parcel 2, the applicant shall pay the standard water quantity fee per lot (fee amount will be the latest approved by USA). i:\engtbrianncomments\rnIp\mlp2000-00005.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2000-00005 Schmidt Inez Partition PAGE 9 • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C O IIGARD Community Development SfapingA(Better Community DATE: July 3,2000 (� / d RECErvEO TO: Julia Huffman,USA/SWM Program 0 (Na J(JI 0 3 2 000 Ju L 1 0 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division By 4 2000 STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner Ix 3111 ciry Phone: (5031639-4111/Fax: (503)684-1291 /O/O/p/O/ . .C7/4/,......„O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/„,„. 6J/O/Q/O/O/O/O/O 7,,,..„„,,„/P/O/O/O/O/O/O/z„„...O/O/O/P„„z„,./O/O/O/../O/O/P/O/O/...,......... .„4„O/O/P/O/,7.„.„„A,„„O/O/p ..../O/O/O� o MINOR LAND PARTITION(MLR 2000-00005 0 ➢ SCHMIDT INEZ PARTITION Q The applicant is requesting to partition one existing lot of 22,548 square feet into two lots of 10,009 and 11,940 square feet with a 600 sq. foot dedication. LOCATION: 10190 SW Inez Street; WCTM 25111 BC, Tax Lot 02200. ZONE: R-3.5: Low–Density Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18. 390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 18,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. it you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. •If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. — Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Tease provide the fodowing information)Name of Persons)Commentin . t –711310o I Phone Humberto): a*\— %o I MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT INEZ PARTITION REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • OIR • UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY MEMORANDUM RECEIVED PLANNING JUL 1 4 2000 DATE: July 13, 2000 CITY OF TIGARD TO: Mathew Scheidegger, City of Tigard FROM: Julia Huffman,USA J 4 SUBJECT: Schmidt Inez Partition, MLP 2000-00005 SANITARY SEWER Each lot in the development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with Unified Sewerage Agency's Design and Construction Standards. Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O 00-7. STORM SEWER Each lot in the development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by the R&O. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. SENSITIVE AREA A "Sensitive Area" exists in the vicinity of the site. A site assessment and certification will be required. Developer must preserve a corridor as described in the R&O separating the sensitive area from the impact of development. The creek, wetland/sensitive area shall be identified on plans. 155 North First Avenue, Suite 270, MS 10 Phone: 503/648-8621 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124-3072 FAX:503/640-3525 --• ....-....---....-- ----•••••••••••••••••-•......f..:::f....1:1'4 ..... • .ml,q4:1:!:ilm.•.•-;q1,•••1/21F.,.7..r:•'1',1111:1711-,f9.717.17.:11.7;'.,;: •••1 .......:'. --t-I,i.f.:4.:;.f.f....::::::i1.1'.::.•::::.;••:::::1::.:. , • -f••...:.'::':"......i.7.•'!1::::..:.::::::::::::„;::::.;::.•'' . ' \.‘,..... 110.1 C 7F ■,;;;'";:■‘!;:;;.4..4"::;!%;;;;;; , ,,;„,:..,,...in.......„„FiglIF:...................:;.......,......•:;•.......,.......:,.............p., .;• .. .,iii*. ....• ,J.;••••••••••••••.r................;...,...:::::::f•il...........; ia:......... ... .. I 1111111.61;f:•11...........i;z4n.;•,...a....;*;;;:;........;...1?:;...•;,..-•1.........E....,:ttett;.;:i„....1$4 44. .. ...';•;,..;...........'. .... ...•.....,,...,..,,,,.1,kl,,•'•1•••' .* ' '•'' .0:!::1;IZI7, 1"•••fiejP0:1..,1.■:•.;• • Tf:7•••••:.•••!....'...'..*:::'......;•ri ; ••.--..'.. I :1:1:;',1:1111 ii•:!'. iiIi.1,7,1,.cs. ...1*.:.,''.'H;r:!:'...:.:1`•••:...-,....t 4•*.:;.::!..* illii.;..:'.,..,19•.•:::•'::::::ns...r.'......;1..::'..i.........i:::::•••• i i ...,,,....,,'.. 4,,,,,,;.,.,.....''.. ....... ,,,,, ................... '.r::::CitAggliii:411:01:11'44104:. qs ....... . .• .• . •".-., :.;.,,,L;::::.4:1:"",..°: ,.•i,'.5;1•...1'.....,:.•:.;.;•,......i I...1. ' .. •!• ••ii."1:::: n,...V''''' ...s• . '.... I i:::''.".'...•.............::;,:iV::::::Pmr..*.:•.::...., .. , .0" ........ -. • .!"..4":4 kilt.....C., %,,'''....--,,,,....-.-.-gr ...iii •; 1•• i iikiiir:!". ; :. %• """.""':.41.... .g1;1°...„...J1 Si■ATZ+!..'•' 10::;;*.**"*;," ,.::: ::::::... I : i I. :*****-11:..******: '2.-1'7-1 .,. :::,...:;*4 ! 'v..•'''-'"111.....:1 " • ::::11::E.O.::::: ::: !..1. i i.:.?;:::.•:• .14.. 1. 1•1;••'1N .111.1111i11.1 91,.......1. 1 :.::`-::::f."91':::::::101:.:'::':.i. \•.................1.1,Y;.1,1i.1.1}':::7 • f ; ;;;1 . i..,a', i '..4.1,.'.. ;:."..:.1.::.3: ... ..i..1.....1.1.11.f...t.... • ; 1 ; .......:...1,.: • -:. . •.1 ;.... .it 1.;;;;:ifil...111:14;•.:•;,.........:........., . I ; , .... • :. ••...-.....t ..-..:-. • " I.- • • • •:‘," ... ... : - •: 't•••?lig • ........1.1••....,. . • • if; ...... . ... .. .11.•,........ ...• . 1.:I • .:::41::::: • `'''.! Villit 1151:::11141;:.:::;:lu.T.1...' 1:.:;....:1:::::::::::!.i•• .. • • 1 ::.TI.:::';1::::•:•:::;::.;.:. i . . . • .. .......... . .,' ; 1 '..".•• i , :'.::•..i. Oit..:::••"'' : , • i..:..':1::::::K:....w.T.::::::%::: :;.••••:••••''. 1**.1•.:,1;1:ii*:+:1 Ji;••••;;;;;J:,•'•. ' .. .....• **„::.•!„*.i.: '''• ..ti:,••,,,•,':., • I •••.".•:..::::•1•E; if;.:0.::...::;.J11;::::;51:::' 1• •'- -,;;;17...i.•I:;:..:••- .........:12.1;•111, '• •'it: .. : •...'...."1"•.".. 't,.••••••••1:1.‹.`1.1h i ..::::::-:..•I ....lia...,..,....;.. ..• :J-!..1. : t••- :. : • :i.i...1.,;;;;. „ ...-• . .. .... 1 ...S.....„..::• 4.:• ,,,,•,;;..................;:.i...; , .. .....,....•....• ...4:„.„......;:„:„:„......,„•;;. ,..„..i -.. ....•-•••.1.......'"'...1...11...• ' •.. ....:, : .. . .. . ...„., , •: ..1.1;;.•11.11;'....'11....; 1.111.......... ........... ....-...Ll.c ;•.••.....,..1.1:1.1 -: • ..1i"....;ii -1:PIP:111:1.......1.11:1:11:1.•1•1:...i.....1...... I, . . . • ' . . .... ........ .1........',1"..t...:1.;-...?-..• •...1.;;...:•:......t... l•••••;:,.......J....• •J.';•;.. • • ........-....,. ..2..........---- ..........--...,-;----"•,..-.14"I. ; . .. ....... .. . r..,.....,.,,.., ... -1Fiti! .i. 1 i • ;„... . • • 1 I ..•1/4,1•,..;;;;;.....r.i..;. •';'.'"•:-..i....:7j.•<;;...1.•.1 1.... / 1......1:::......A..: 1::•;;;;.::::;;;.- I.- •••.. 1 I • . . :•;..............,,: -::::-.: • -.-.11--?-4...- •* • 1111;4'..11;1441'"i-1'•{411 ; ; I / ; . . . . . .•.. ..-1•1i:...." '''.1'11.1-:-;.;.,..w........ 1'*** • - 1 '.1- ; • '1' '.1i" 41.7:041:1:1:1::::.!::i.ti..:.:: • •••••• • • .. ; . ... • -••-• : ••••; • :!;':1;'::M 4111112r"," ''':-:. ' . . •••••!•■•••:,t.k.: ,,,AP.F.I.'44.11.:.:::::** ••••••• N:,,,, #. 1 '• ' • •,,. „. I.-,--••••••••• i I ' • . . : . . . . . : • ' • *.**),."`'**•-•'.1.?...*:,•••::.•••••••,,',/?..,•:11:itig."' ... •• , ...„. ..! • I ,. . . •••••„ ..,.•••• .. - '' • ....›...' •).•':•••C.,• •';.:''..'•• . ii•iii!••;:::.:,i ' .:::.••••••*..j,... ' i • ., '.;;;!••-..*;•:*:::.!•':17.1P!**•:%.r ':* • i• . : ••••••...i?";•••*•:.....,........•/•;71 *... ..' •** .... j••• •;1•:•*;:.1 l!• .,, • . : :1.: • „.. '*.:i*,;;:;;:..:i...T.:.!:;::.■i:..'** * ,•••••••..::::::b..,1:::......:1'.*:4;;;git •,i:',,,,:;•,...:%LI.•••••• „„„,,,, , .,...,,, ....... . ... •• -• ... ...., , .. „..„. s. 4.,, . . . .. :.-- ;:..... ...' *'':••.•':.:•••••I.1••••.••..•.'•••'•n•••:•••''• *....`••••:::: .1‘...:.!.'•'••••`•••1•::•"i.::.' ***''t*.••••• '' •• •• 1.•:••••••%:1'.: •.. . \• - : I "11';'.11F'1••4.**1.. 71:11.111fil , :;•••:**K**,;••**•.") ••••' \'. ' •••••,..-1 f........„.... ;.„. .:•:;.. 1 •.• •- , •• : • • .40106i.1:*,•-1;1■1; - .i0.41•:„.....,4,.::::r:.:99 :1,..:.... . -.: ••::•.••-•• ..; ..:..: .1..t.tt..t...„...... •••••• :...:.....• '...11111.,;;::-1'- .,... .. ..... ..........;'''''........'.... 1 -.1 C)1 .1...1.- :-..• •••.7'........1;77.- 4.: :::::.. .41;71:::::::.i:HI11-1-...:.!;::: •II: ....4.11'1"1'.....,...; 1,...;;;.1.1:iit.1....,...::::•••.;:::;!.:,.......... 1 •••••; 911:1-11:.'..:1' . .1.11.11,.:1": ** • . , ;.••i••••* •.1....i..;;••••••••••.' ;,;;Pifir,;;•;!:;;!:;:::.;!1:::•:...:•. :.:.:.:::: .... ... . ......1....;•4 1.4:•'•i:rtc...rit,r• .... *rr•r..1 ' 1 '•''...'..ir•••:::1::::::::',:i:',...•:::::;::•:•":•'''L • •- "*. "- "- • ••• 'Irmo ,...:.•,,,,i4:t•i, •' ,.,. .,. :.;..."-:;•....::....44.::::::::::::::•,.::......;.;:s:;',.•:,...:::...1.:i::......:i..;.:411::.::!IVIH.;:l:i:ii:ii ... 1.r.,.: .. .---:.....------------1 :1!!!!::;11tir'r;F.' •' '.1g.-thiCI::::::::::,:•::....• . ••..: :: . *1::::*****.• :1:1 ' •••••""" k14! :...--11 I..11:-. ,„ ..:.:.'''......:•11.:4.1••1•!1'..**?:''.7. 1•:-.•:•:1'......„..il.1'.1.'f11.****** -' '''''''••••••• . ''••• •••••'• ......4 ' . 1'1 :11'i: 1. • •'•;`...g1:11'...1., 1.1:111:1:11.:.!11 .. ..1.1;......:1:11'1.'1'1 r *'.. . i omit,: . ii . :11:11".11111.1.1 F... g .. ....!....i.i.'....:::;:,..: • ..:.:;,".1 : `................[.•....'....:1 .•:• ,..: ....!...4..i.',...:::.•:•'. .......•.kt......•.iii::".ti-..4: i . .. . .............0 ... . ... I.1;•...... •............. 111•••.'I::....:•';'•*•:.•.•...;AA i.,i'dta 14!"..$'4q:LI::•••:11.:N: • op,:r•ii is:I::. :::::::::•::••::•:::::: • .:I•ii'..,[..•-••,..4.:•,:ii••••:*, »i .71.1i.:1:1. WM .,1,1.'1! - .--.,•:114.1.1111.11,1.1...11...,151._. ....-i-,..........y... , : • • " :••"" ••••• --••• • 711:1 • ...1.1..1..1:1:1,.., • i I. . : 1 1 1 1! e11.4143\7:111‘.;:•• .,..: t... ...........,, ..,,1011 1. ' lig • 1.1.•.... • 11:::!1:11111;111.11.11111:1111r: 1' if,•''V.: 4.11 ...! ;..:i:■:::,':..',.!;1•::::::.:1:.:::I:::.:::..1..F.:1;;;!•.:: ,.' • 1:11 ... i I ',1. I I 1 1 F"''''''' 1111.!:,........11' . ..: '1:11!'1111:111:1111114:1.0.11, ,:v 11:1_1:..,.....;:p..,!“...i...!,!!viir • . . .• . . ..:..T....•:..c.1 ; ' ' ••• -... ..."•••• 1. • ! 11'......., ''''.11-1•'W 11. . . ..• ..:.'• T.1•:•••'''•1:l••••••,•••11.11111:11•••• •! :1... 1a•••• •••••••: 11'•• •••• '''''' ''..:1.11•1'.......1111.11111.11..:1.1.:11.1:.'1::1.111:1:',1!..i:11.111.11.4. 111illiT'...,......1. .• ....:•:•i'....17:::: • .......: ..4..',........::!. 1. :,....!..f, i ••';14,•:.•!•••;;;•••Iiii.•i•••iii*::::*•!'"•'''''*';':*•••:.•••••:•ii•••'..1•••11F...i.:ii• i, l• •• '• *'••••••*•••• . : :.• . .. . . . •.. ' * : •••: .., : * :'i*.*•,*••••:r••'•••••••• .........r.:!••••:' • • ..••• ..• . . .. .. „. •.:^;•.:.•;;;;I:•••ii.•,••••••:•:**••i:ih^, ..,..::••4';•• i • ' • •••• ••1 'ilif`..I11•11;1:.1:111.1:.,,i,..i.i, 4:;•....,..1•1:.::ti.••: i ..„..._,... „„. z„ . i . , . • ..., .;.• •'•:•'.'hi ••••,!•••1:I''''•• ..:''•••••••••. I •'"" • I . 1 : 'ill.: •* ••••:,.4:••,,Iiiih••••••1,.• I 1 **•••• •1'. ;"*. -77 • • .I::: ' •, .N ....... .: . i• .. J....... :::i...r:::_::::::::::::::::.....„1:.....„*„....„....:::T-1•••• • . , • 1 III • • 1 1.,...;isr.:;;;T:ii:!:iii,i!„...:.17.i:;...,.....,..r...„,e„..:1.1... . ,.....i ,':.'''''.... .. :... _::::::.:...••.,1:•:•••:•:•:::::,,,z• , : „ . ..... , :::::-.1:-.11:111.1111111411111i111.1.f.111r1.1 r":11.1T:i.. ' .......!..,' !.'''.1.:11.:„.:•4.1........1:..1:11:4•'•••••'••''f? 11`.1...... I ' 1.' '1'1...I •• •-•." 1 CI . 3 1 ,:!1......1111.i!!!1!..'..1..qi 1 ....,....o...........1.1.1. .... ::11.......i:•,... :a.,,.:.*i: t ...:if.....• . . .. : . 1 ..•:...1.....:,i**•'. .S............?.1.;;•••,ii.;:::•).:::• ,.i.,••1.:•..;•.:::', '"'" ''.•'-' ' •I'''''''....it''.7.!:•■•'•;•.'d.i.': ....IP:I.:"... 0 •. . ..• ' . :::;..„•,• .. 1,-j:1:1P:171i'''''''. : !‘:11•J:i1111"1.,;‘,. •11:.. .11.„1.....1:114. -. . t f.: ;11..1..•. ....::......,i1,1i.„.,11 • 11 '-•' ,:,;.111.11.' •• '.•!•••••!.111•111••:.'j 1- .:7;4. ..„.:1:11:11,t1.4.......e.::::;i::::!..rtil:::-..,-.....f. 1-f..........'l.il.......4 . . .., • ---,...:................1.1.........11.1'1.1.111;1-1. :.;.......1.....t i :..........4 .........;;;;;'....1::::11..f....:;.1.......i • • •1 • ; I. ....:..:.;.111.1. .. i t.. • • . . i . ....„ . . • Iii;I: . ::•1.1 • ...........•........1...ni • 1/1.. .....:; ; r...,:.1 .. 1.....:;,.,-;-1:::....r.7.t;;.....,-.....;••••••1 ..........;;;...................... ....... • ••......... .••••....... •......6.. .c.-;; .....-; ....... • • . . . • - - • ... ...'....11 I:....;.i.p.m. ..••1 •. '.....:•:.:::::::::.;........1........1,1:::::::::::::.1i.1.1:1;:;;;:ii;114....J1.111..:,;• H.... ....4.;;;,.„,,,,Fi i c) i I i i , : 1 ; ; t.......1.......;i......•.............;;J.45.v.....i,i...i.:;.:p•.i......i.,;•:1.1•44 .:1f. .....t.., .1 :;;;:i.:1:1:!:::1..• f ';' .. 1.• 1:..:.;.:.:•.•.......;!..:1:••••••.•........•••:'.71.1 91 :11..tilii: 1:::F..•......" ....••••••1• • ...••••11.1.k.11..:h..11....1 .....: 1...• . 11. I rt--..:.:rrtr.i,' . ..• ' .r , .?.. r..'.-•r.r/ .....! ,:. .>, .!:11•1 .....::::•.:4.'.:!•]••::::::::::!:::r i ' 1 :.,Ii.'4,,,,,,,.....;. • .,i....,..,.., t t 4 • •''•••••••••••7,0-1••.. .:1.:::(1'.(4.: :1...!!:1...:..,:..,1,.t..t.........:. , •••••'''': .„ ,.,..:•...:..........i...L::......,...::: 11'.....; '111!1"111:11.11-11.*: • 1 1''.11.'. 4..„..............,1. 1 '1. .. ' •'''• 1. •. ! . 1.1111';'/14.,*::11.1.;:i'::..1` 1„11....... I...../ i ......,..-1:: .r...--•-... • '• . :• , • . . -::::'".,..'.1.11.1i......!':.'::...1'i:::..1...:!::.1.-..-.'...:1:-H'.1..,.....r--77H....“1:•:::..::::':. .',.. ..4.. . ... .......... . .1 :••• 1 ......i• ':••• •• .,.,....,.,:: .,::•,.....1......:73 . .. . . . ... . •1... •....i.r.r.r.K• . , ............ r:, - '.. ''''....r ".'4r.:,..iri:rtr.:•:::".:„ sr', ...11 f : •1•. . ::-. ... 1 F.- • . : . . . . . ...1•11f..... • ••••::::•1::•::::::-..::::::„1::::.:::::::....I.:••:::......1.• !••:: .....:.../.........:::::•:••:•::1):1:•::,t.......... •,. : z :‹ .../........:4•:.z..4„..7 .::,-; .)1. --liairitii :- -••••: • : ---zr-.1 ........•• :. . •••• . .. .. ....••••••___•: 1•::•:::...41•••••,..z.....4.::::::•.:z..,--••••:-" :.:.:...::.::.:.. :1::•::::::11.1:,:: 4:•::::.:::•.......i......... : • . . / ... . . . „... . ....... .. c.,...) 1...../... ./::::: /.....:. :,......... .:..„..._::::,._ . :.::..:.:::::::1.:11:1'11111:1111.111111.1•11!11'1..1111:...............,1...... '' . ....„ 11....:...'••--- 1 . . : . 1..... 1..1.......-1-,...........',!.1‘,s1."...11111•17.71'.ri. ....1.... .., ::.„.„„,,.„.„.„:„,:„,p5.::::::::,:•••:. •••........'.........::::::1:•::::::::....:::.:4:••••;::••::::•i:. : .. •. . ••: i•• -.1.•••••••sv::•• ::,,....r 1 J• ,...... i ..1: 1:',,,,.....,a.§:..;:•-.1:1.*4::::.1.i....:Iiii ••••••.,:•:•:::!::::::,1.::::::::::-. ' :,:•:•....1i.i...:::•,,,,a. , , .,'1.?::1 i.... -). , :.'•• . :.•::-....''.•••••.....„..-,4•.•:<:".1....!•.4,4•:,..:1•:1:4;;;... i• i . .. ••••• ... ..........:. •••• ,... .,„,.. ...I ! .. .-.•„.. ... , ,........„ ....i..... , :,.:.::: :''.1,:::...... : ..- .:: ::: :.. ,:••.: 1• , 1.-.AN:.•:•,,,•''''''.0i1. i,. .:.:: i 1 I'.::::• . '„...„:':.: 1...:........i.i:..::i •••I •'•••ii : 1::•-:,•• •...,...'1.•1•••••:••• i •••:: .....: ._...... . ..,.a.,:l....::::"...".1::::::::,:::::.:.:::•••.:::f...••:::::.......:...„::::::::::::::.f.::::::::::::!........,,,,f.• i•••• ..! •..•.•••.:.i. .:::..........1:::::„....,........::.:. :::,. ::,••••,.."N:::::,:::::1.::,:,..i...11:,..1...4:::::::,!..........:::]..,:::::::::.:::::::i1„.„.„::1:::::::i:::::o........4::::1::::::.4.......•..1•••:•••••••..1,........„..!..Ti.::..„'::::::,.::.:.::::.:„...:::...::::...::::::....•:-.....1..:• :::::::::::::::::::•••••••••••:::::::::4:c:111::tili:illii: 1:1:::::.::::::::::::•....:,....1:...i.f..!..1. .,.:.....0,...:::::,14.....k*ig.1.4::::::::::.:i:::;:::.:::.:::::,....::::::::4i:. ......„:„„ ............... .,..i.j. „ii.:::::::::::,:::-..:s.•,...........:::::p.i.:•,.,„ •:::1•:::::::::::,,-::,...,:-• .. ,. .f•••.•,•..,.:,.:91::0;,,••4•11..t.i,.:,.,:c......„:•.•:::•iitt::::?iilft.tttitr,..111,. ... F.,.1?.F.J. • •,... -:•.,.....,....!4.•,.. .:::•••• ••••-'. •.,':„•:::..i.:!.4.•:::::::,.::,.. .,. :1:..1:::,...i.m0:14.': „..N. •:, ' ' I .,•....: ••...••.•••••:-...t,:•.....!•:::!•,..F.:.:::::„..-„, : ::•:••••:...;•r•,,,:r::::;.::::::::,:. -,:t,!...!,: .....: 1:. :: •:.,. .. ......::::•,i...........!;:-:•I i,.....,..:i...„... .,..........:..., ....:.::,, . .......... .......................... ...„,..••• ::,,:.:••••.. ..'... . :::........I.:„.:: . . . •.. . . . . . . ...,4: i.:i6....i.li,,,,.:4,...;.::.i.r.,...................„.... i: " • :: .. ... . . . . . . . • •::.J.d.:,.,:.•1 - : • : . ... . . . .. .• 11:1:::::,:t...:::::•:•71 . „.4,..7.r, • . : . 1..:/./,,,?, ••. . .•: • • . . :. -:. '• i „. 11,„..... , ..... : • • • : .• . . , ... . ... ... .._„ ...,„ • •••• • : .:;.:••.„,,.....• ,..,,ot....;:;,...:......:,.,..„..•••••••......:.,•• .:::::::•.•:•:1::::::.• ;;/: . ; .. •.., . .. -..."....'.." , 1.'.11:1::::::::-..,..............: ....,..„ ,...:....F.... .11111111. .' . „.11:•'•'''.''',1••1'1••..........••11.':'...•.....• •...... /•1..**\ .‘1.11... (.3,, *,; 1 •I . . • •. . . 1 1..., .• -------. . . „. * : : 111.6f11-# :111.4....1:11111:.1'1' . •!1".11:1Ck 1.'1171....:...:1,1,1...!..1.1„..: .......- '...1' 1 • •11'I '' : '1• I :•s ..11:•1.1:11,11..1...r :11,..„,1...(1.1,11'11.1*.1/11'1' .'1' •'... .,1.:1,..1.1.:1:11.411.1,1, ;il.i.111;1111,';''.:11:11.1.<1;F11:1'..1.1%„.1i.I1..:.1..:1:-. ./' ''''.: 11...... '''-15*...1 (:). iY).. •. ••. •••• •••• . . . . • • 'I : . : I ! ' ' •s t•Di **s•••.. •••: 1 /1'1114'7•111:1'1i1 11:11'1.1;11.14`1...1.111.71:..;:.1'.'I........:.::.. . ...// • • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C O IOARD Community(Development ShapingA Better Community DATE: July 3,2000 RECEIVED PLANNING m': Michael Miller,Operations Utility Manager JUL 0 7 2000 CITY OF TIGARD FROM(1J L City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner(x311] Phone: 15031639-4111/Fax: 15031684-1291 /P/O/P/O/.O/Q/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/P/O/q/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/A/P/.O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/P/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/•O/P/4/4/O/O/O/P/4/O/P/O/O/O/O/P/.C7/p/O/O/O/O/P/P/O/4/O/O/O/.p/A/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/.O/4/O/O/O/O/O/.P/O/O0 a MINOR LAND PARTITION(MLR 2000-00005 0 ➢ SCHMIDT INEZ PARTITION Q The applicant is requesting to partition one existing lot of 22,548 square feet into two lots of 10,009 and 11,940 square feet with a 600 sq. foot dedication. LOCATION: 10190 SW Inez Street; WCTM 2S111 BC, Tax Lot 02200. ZONE: R-3.5: Low—Density Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18. 390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity May and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 18,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: SE V We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information)Name of Perseids)Commenting: f4/gE bill. Phone Numberisi: \39 MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT INEZ PARTITION REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C O IIGARD Community cDeve(opment Shaping A Better Community DATE: July 3,2000 TO: Gary Lampella,Building Official �ECENEp 9LPNN1NG FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division �uL 0 2.000 STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner(x317) CITY OF TIGARD Phone: (5031639-4111/Fax: (5031684-1291 /4/O/•P/P/.!7/O/Q/Q/O/O/Q/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/p/4/O/O/4/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/P/.p/p/O/O/O/O/O/O/4/4/O/Q/4/O/O/O/O/O/P/.O/A/4/O/O/O/O/P/P/P/p/Q/O/O/O/O/P/O/O/O/O/4/O/4/O/O/O/O/O/O/P/�/4/Q/Q/O/O/O/O/P/P/0o MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLR 2000-00005 0 ➢ SCHMIDT INEZ PARTITION The applicant is requesting to partition one existing lot of 22,548 square feet into two lots of 10,009 and 11,940 square feet with a 600 sq. foot dedication. LOCATION: 10190 SW Inez Street; WCTM 25111 BC, Tax Lot 02200. ZONE: R-3.5: Low–Density Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18. 390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 18,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: — (T1 ase provide the folio-wing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: 420) Phone Number(s): •act y .— MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT INEZ PARTITION REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C.OFTIOARD Community(DeveCopment Shaping Better Community DATE July 3,2000 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division RECEIVED PLANNING STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner[x 3171 JUL 0 6 2000 Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-7291 CITY OF TIGARD MINOR LAND PARTITION(ML )I 2000-00005 / ➢ SCHMIDT INEZ PARTITION Q The applicant is requesting to partition one existing lot of 22,548 square feet into two lots of 10,009 and 11,940 square feet with a 600 sq. foot dedication. LOCATION: 10190 SW Inez Street; WCTM 25111 BC, Tax Lot 02200. ZONE: R-3.5: Low—Density Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18. 390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 18,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the folrowing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: J►M VJ61- Phone Numbertsl: X a 21 MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT INEZ PARTITION REQUEST FOR COMMENTS FLAAVitiG SECRET/I Ry /fATR/4LS • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CRY IG OF TIGARD Community CDeveropment SkapingA•Better Community STATE OE OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, cPatricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of'T[igard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) • ❑ NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: i ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) (Date of Public Heanng) O City of Tigard Planning Director O Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: • ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) (Date of Public Heanngs) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director O Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF: (Type/Kind of Notice) FOR: I (File NoJName Reference) V (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE'S) of which is attached, mar.ed Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked 3hibit' :",on Au I ust14 J; .of eposi -d in the United States Mail on August14,2000, postage prepaid. ot� "1s.. hat Pre. --d lice) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the lU day of , 2000. sus: , I �rl Ic I I ' •:�'-: S ^ICIL SEAL"' °" SPER.; RP:p EGON IVI Commission Expires: ;�ij/3 c13 �MY C M MY COMMISSION IXP1k S MAY 2003 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2000-00005, ■ -414-AL ,CITY OF TIGARD: Community®evetoprnent SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 10/25/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2000-00005 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Minor Land Partition approval to partition one (1) existing lot of 22,549 square feet into two lots of 10,009 and 11,940 square feet with a 600 square foot dedication. APPLICANT: Corbin Shags/Urban Visions 2123 SE 12 Avenue Portland, OR 97214 OWNER: Troy Schmidt 10190 SW Inez Street Tigard, OR 97223 ZONING DESIGNATION: R-3.5; Low-Density Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. LOCATION: 10190 SW Inez Street; WCTM 2S111 BC, Tax Lot 02200. PROPOSED PARCEL 1: 10,009 Square Feet. PROPOSED PARCEL 2: 11,940 Square Feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390 (Decision-Making Procedures); 18.420 (Land Partitions); 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation); 18.715 (Density Computations); 18.790 (Tree Removal); 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development' Director's' designee 'has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the Full Decision located at City Hall. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 14, 2000 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 29, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. VA eal: • 0 ector's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Community Development Code Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Community Development Code Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 28, 2000. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner at (503), 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT :A, ornof Dam ---- APPLICANT:TROT 5ON1gr 1m90 sw wxx smFFr. ncum OR 97:24 519-64x0 � � REPRESENTA71\E:URBAN 1.12x6 b qw..r STREET SSlM=E. xTN AVENUE H [m [w S.W. INEZ o,MAMA_ ___ '=�,""'°' n°w OWI OR 7214 E [d —� — 797-9567 C N,N., 4 `-'Ei�' i_ URy,_ .z LOCATION:10190 5 w 0E2 STREET • —047 — —n N.:�..,•••,..,. 1 5 l•%i:._tan -1 STATE ID:50502005 n]/.Y•'_.IAIIIlir1 AIO.Z.11�EN, s a.wn -�•.- N.D'WOE ZONE:0-30.(10,000 Sr LOTS)y �'q OCOICAM9I AT PROPOSAL'OMELLI G WLLRFYAIN,NO VYN.WLES.EfuSrwL • Wv t i<4r- -. i a\i%,I\ ` MEA 5002x. r rl+ MCEL 1 CONNCCIED TO PUBIIt SAmiMT ,'+ v. '.,P., SANITARY:P ...:;:t•.. �_. --_�-------1 R PMLEL x TO BC CaNECTEO i0 PUBLIC SWIT.WT R WATER:PMCCL 1 CONNECTED TO 0 0110 001(0 ''''' - ,I q m PIJICR x i0 BC CONNCC7C0 i0 PUBLIC AMR q1 r{'}; I b6 I I STORN:PARCEL 1 DRAINS TO MD.BLOW 5T51Eu .tiI '. .3r•'`- I ARC00 x TO 0010 TO SOANAI'{ 000 M I w BE PUYPCO i0 PUBLIC STORU lwE m'4�w II SUPPLEYEHTAL RAN 5.w tt]1N �� l DENSITY OI a(.1',°, r I I I `'s L_ , E NµO 111)005 10 00 SEUONm CALLS:MLR.ATE AREA:x.545 Sr ,d h 1 `� 'it.. - TR IRFES R BE PNOTEC00 WIN CAna ARM 000 SF. -, 7 '• i PARCR 1 ARM 10.009 sr. • '��.:._ PARCEL 1 ;.1104 n0.iPROPO D PLAN. �/' j, 1 /,°,�X030 v. ,\ -MERE 1s No PROPOSED PuNnNC INN P00EEL_5N P n,9a sr. TMN PMnnCN PRC ACCESS ME AREA}10.507 Sr. F r;'/I. [ - o IRRIGATION srslFU IS REawm /L;�?f L 4+\ C '�' °`f -DERE wu BE No w�D1NC w sTaDlwwc F F!'• th0E3.:.. , TOSCO. / - 1OP201 SOME wrORUAn(N AIONX XEAEON (,;a. ( 1�H[y -NO m4 TREATMENT 1S REWIRED SUPPLIED BT DIE PROPERTY OWNER • �' PUBLIC 51PR059ENT5/51000 RAN: NO C0110UR2 APPROXIMATE SX GRADE •E 7.0_,I�2 �F jF S I PARCEL 2 / 9.4• 7 0 Mr STREET 64520N0ENI5 TAE PROPOSED ei aFx, 7.( -pjqiP / a*ORC/EROVa C901R0E RAN: 1000/ \\�`��ft Th Lt PR 3 .r.-0..w v.wWOn.uP.°a i°1 750E -wn00 040 BE 90100 ro s0.!55090 00unax >•,-�. {' '. , OuP10 N1 X7! TTIC00 00u 9 00 WA. c 0¢N 0NC 0IIE WGI02A1000•wacs. � tJr 11 5L 1lfi t.1.;s i 1 dPi >r 7 -EROSaN c10ma-000 00 a0000ND CONS1RUCnaN AREA <N) • [I ti 14 t 1 N —CONST1NCnON[NMANCE 04111 E U14JxF0. S5J rti,,,,,-iS`,11 ,fir, \.s}� T1��{t'�•8,$'.- -EEST TREES TO �V// /"1 7� t•'D 7T.AOL •'\ .< ° 190000 AT D00000 eE woncrto Wm CasTRUCnn+ • .�...'fIl. ..,..n 1?f:;rn' la �1 / 0.7 9 BAtg 1 WONRr uu o.,, NOT TOISAIE it m. '/ • 717 !f l? 1, w5 TENTATIVE PLAN TAX LOT noo, 2S 1W Tin , , . "244.77... ..I!1.C 11 R1W.,W.N. ._ _650X__aLwY_•/TI'�[i-8 �`_°'TREY'.f+rl\�i_arm_yR_ Ele _; dTY OF TIGARD I�I ,y WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON JANUARY 20,2000• Centerline Concepts Inc. �pC DRAWN WY:NPW CHECKED BY;0400)11 OS'C 1'-30' ACCOUNT#150-3726 600 0202 Cr,004.1100 0..y.'07017 u:\BNO\5004101]7x0\S01001SC • 503 650-0100 1R.003 0550-0100 CITY OF TIGARD t SCHMIDT INEZ PARTITION SITE PLAN N MLP2000-00005 •(Map is not to scale) IX `/07. I CITY 01010000 + •NZEN -0 E. _ CT v N. VICINITY MAP _rt, � SCHMIlYNNEZ ■ III A PARTITION li I I r 9 I m �� MLP2000-00005 ^1I ■ w lulir TE`.. VIEWS 1 rd111 N INF7 ST I. \ =: .11 WiI: NEI Ell I SUBJECT SIT No • Qii I • 111 mil N 1 HT R•• < ST • := L_I ______Allir • , In Fog >11111 ge _l 'nag _J City 001022d m L. DEI M1NTF OR__[,3 > "" r Pw°'. ww"°'°"" • • • ( c Ot ,) 2S1;1CB-00102 2S111BC•02401 EXHIBIT B ALEXANDER RONALD E CROSS ROGER K III&CLARE E MARY T 10155 SW MURDOCK ST 10150 SW MURDOCK TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 S 111 CB-00104 2S 111 BC-02300 AL . • DER RONA I FANTZ GARY E AND GAY MARY 14530 SW 103RD AVE 10151 :• -DOCK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,OR 97 25 111 BC-01300 2S 111 CB-00103 BAILEY AUNDRIA E , FOSTER CRAIG A&CAREN 10150 SW VIEW TERRACE 10200 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-02000 2S 111 BC-02700 BAKER JAMES WILBUR GLEAVES GREGORY L&JONETTE HELENE 10380 SW CANTERBURY LN 10070 SW INEZ ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 BC-01000 2S 111 BC-04600 BAUMAN C WAYNE GOTTER SAMUEL A&VICTORIA L MARY 17580 SW 131ST AVE 10270 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S111BC-03800 2S111 BC-01900 BERTULEIT MIRIAM R/DANIEL TRS HANSEN DOUGLAS V&CHERI L 10390 SW VIEW TERRACE ST 14535 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-00200 2S 111 BC-04500 BOGERT MARK H AND HENERY JOSEPH J& MARY E BACCELLIERI FRANCES D 14445 SW 100TH 10700 SW BEAV-HLSDL HWY#585 TIGARD,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 2S 111 BC-01400 2S 111 BC-00100 BUEHLER GREGORY J&SARA L HIGGINS PETER B JOANNE C 10145 SW VIEW TER 14345 SW 100TH TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 C8-00101 2S 111 BA-02500 BUSH PATRICIA LYNN HODLER DON R& 10250 SW MURDOCK ST HODLER ARTHUR T& TIGARD,OR 97224 HODLER CARL H 14470 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-02503 25111 BC-01100 CORLISS JAMES UCORA K KARPSTEIN GREGORY A& 9750 SW INEZ KARPSTEIN BRIAN A& TIGARD,OR 97223 ELLERMEIER JEAN 10220 SW VIEW TERR TIGARD,OR 97224 • • • 2S111BB-00900 251118C-01500 KASTEL CHARLES G&MARY J TRS MUDROW MICHAEL T&DIANE C 14259 SW 100TH 10185 SW VIEW TERR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111BC-02100 2S111BC-02302 LITTLETON DAVID A AND WANDA J NOKES JOHN RICHARD&EVELYN J 10090 SW INEZ 14650 SW 103RD AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 261118A-02400 2S 111 BC-02303 LYNN CHARLES W NOKES KATHY EVELYN WILMA L 14600 SW 103RD 14350 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 1118C-01800 2S 111 BC-00600 MALCOMSON ROBERT TANYA PARTINGTON BRIGITTE ANNE 14525 SW 100TH 10085 SW INEZ ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 28111 BC-00500 25111 BC-00300 MARSHALL JAMES H&ANNETTE L PERKINS VERN&SHERYL L 10055 SW INEZ ST 14415 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-00900 2S1 11 BC-02800 MATIAS CATHLEEN F PRESBYTERY OF PORTLAND THE 14480 SW 103RD AVE CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH TIGARD,OR 97224 10445 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-02501 2S 111 BC-03200 MAYS KENNETH W&KARLEEN R PRUETT MARTHA 10115 SW MURDOCK ST 10335 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-00700 2S 111 BD-00301 MCBRIDE GLEN W&JANET M QUINN DONALD R JR 10135 SW INEZ SHIRLEY A TIGARD,OR 97224 14530 SW 100TH TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 BC-04000 2S 111 BC-03900 MILLER JUDITH A&PAUL E TRS RAUDY BEVERLY 10330 SW VIEW TER 10360 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-02500 2S1111313-01000 MILROY JOHN T AND SHIRLEY REEDER MARY R 1102 NW SPRINGBROOK RD STE 251 14300 SW 103RD AVE NEWBERG,OR 97132 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 2S111BC-00800 2S111BC-04200 RENICK ALVIN W AND CARLA M WESTENHAVER DANA A&MARY LYN T 10175 SW INEZ 14563 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BD-00310 25111 BC-04400 ROMMEL WILLIAM R WILDER RANDY A&JANETTE L DEANNA L COCHRAN BOYD C&WANDA J 14570 SW 100TH ST WESTENHAVER DANA L&MARY LYN TRS TIGARD,OR 97223 14563 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-01600 2S 111 BC-04300 SARGANT FRANCIS J RUTH WILDER RANDY A/JANETTE L 10225 SW VIEW TERRACE 14541 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111BC-02200 2S11113C-04100 SCHMIDT TROY M&SUSAN L YARNELL R ROSS&MELINDA D 10190 SW INEZ ST 14587 SW 100TH TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111BC-01200 SEARS ALLEN C Go WILLIAMS GRANT&LANA 10190 SW VIEW TER TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111 BD-00311 SHANNON LAWRENCE S JOAN JENNIE 9970 SW PEMBROOK TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 BC-01700 STACK RICHARD W JUDITH C 10265 SW VIEW TERR TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 11 CB-02700 THOMAS DONALD W BONNIE L 14940 SW 103RD TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-02600 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT 8841 SW COMMERCIAL TIGARD,OR 97223 2S111BC-00400 UNTALAN JOSE C&JUANITA F TRUSTEES 14485 SW 100TH TIGARD,OR 97224 - • - • • Sally Christensen Bill Find( 15685 SW 166 Avenue 9235 SW Mountain View Lane Tigard, OR 91224 . Tigard, OR 91224 Mary Ann Melvin Kristen Miller 10395 SW Bonanza Way 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard,OR 91224 Tigard, OR 91223 Stephen Bicker CITY OF TIGARD 14235 SW 97th Avenue SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 97224 Mark Bogert 14445 SW 100'Avenue is\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc UPDATED: 9-Jun-00 Tigard, OR 97224 Twyla Brady 9360 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 91223 Debra Muir 15065 SW 79t Avenue Tigard, OR 91224 Sue Siebold 15374 SW Thurston Lane Tigard, OR 91224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt. #3 Tigard, OR 91224-3316 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 91224 • • Il, AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING 1!I CITY OFTIGARD Community tDeveropment Shaping A Better Community STATE. of OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. - City of Tigard ) I, cPatricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of 2'tgard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: PleCk APP�Priate Box(s)Bekm) ❑ NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: i ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council • ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:1 ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission •0 Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF: (Type/Kind of Notice) FOR: (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEIS] of which is attached, mark-: 3 11111 "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B",on Au I ust14 2! LI and •-posi d in the United States Mail on August 14,2000, postage prepaid. O son e, ed lice) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the /0 day of Oar , 2000. ,024 OFFICIAL SEAL . ' I ��' ' I ; I I I SHERMAN S.CASPER Vu ® COMM SS ON C-OREGON My Commission Expires:`lQyf3 ? 7 NO.323409 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 13,2003 (/ • • • EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION -- A MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2000-00005 CITY OF TIGARD SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION Community Development Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 10/25/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2000-00005 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Minor Land Partition approval to partition one (1) existing lot of 22,549 square feet into two lots of 10,009 and 11,940 square feet with a 600 square foot dedication. APPLICANT: Corbin Shays/Urban Visions 2123 SE 12th Avenue Portland, OR 97214 OWNER: Troy Schmidt 10190 SW Inez Street Tigard, OR 97223 ZONING DESIGNATION: R-3.5; Low-Density Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally.. LOCATION: 10190 SW Inez Street; WCTM 2S111 BC, Tax Lot 02200. PROPOSED PARCEL 1: 10,009 Square Feet. PROPOSED PARCEL 2: 11,940 Square Feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390 (Decision-Making Procedures); 18.420 (Land Partitions); 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation); 18.715 (Density Computations); 18.790 (Tree Removal); 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section V. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION. PAGE 1 OF 12 • • • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PARTITION PLAT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: Submit the following to the Planning Department (Mathew Scheidegger 639-4171 x317) for review and approval: 1. Provide evidence that the tree located in the visual clearance area will be maintained to a height no less then 8 feet. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 2. A Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the sanitary sewer tap, driveway approach for Parcel 2 and any other work in the public right-of-way. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 3. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 4. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30.00. 5. The final plat shall indicate a right-of-way dedication on SW Inez Street to provide 25 feet from centerline. 6. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall enter into a Street Improvement Agreement with the City whereby they agree to complete or participate in the future improvements of SW Inez Street adjacent to the subject property, when any of the following events occur: A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the formation of a Local Improvement District, B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for in whole or in part by the City or other public agency, C. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and involves the sharing of design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s) of property in addition to the subject property, or • 7. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate by the City Engineer in conjunction with construction of improvements by others adjacent to the subject site. 8. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall submit a formal storm drainage design for Parcel 2. If an infiltration system is proposed, as shown in the applicant's materials, then the applicant shall also provide a back-up pump system that would pump any overflow stormwater out to the public storm drainage system in SW 103rd Avenue. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION PAGE 2 OF 12 • • 9. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Inez Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 3,300.00 and it shall be paid prior to approval of the final plat. 10. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. 11 Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. C. The right-of-way dedication for SW Inez Street shall be made on the final plat. D. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive a letter from the City Engineering Department indicating: 1) that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor, and 2) that the applicant has either completed any public improvements associated with the project, or has at least obtained the necessary public improvement permit from the City to complete the work. E. Once the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer's signature. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 12. The applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a mylar copy of the recorded final plat. 13. Prior to issuance of the building permit for Parcel 2, the applicant shall pay the standard water quality fee per lot (fee amount will be the latest approved by USA). 14. Prior to issuance of the building permit for Parcel 2, the applicant shall pay the standard water quantity fee per lot (fee amount will be the latest approved by USA). THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION NOTED UNDER THE PROCESS AND APPEAL SECTION OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION PAGE 3 OF 12 • • Property History: The subject parcel is located within the City of Tigard. The property is designated Low Density Residential on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map. A previous Land Partition was applied for in 199 The file was closed due to the applicant's selling the property and not responding to incomplete submittal letters. No other land-use approvals were found to be on file in the City's records. Site Information and Proposal Descriptions The subject property is approximately 22,549 square feet. The site has approximately 120 feet of frontage on SW Inez Street. The owner is proposing a two-parcel partition as indicated on the proposed partition plat. Parcel #1 (10,009 square feet) and Parcel #2 (11,940 square feet). A residential structure exists on Parcel #1. SECTION IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS The City mailed notice to property owners within 500 feet of the subject site providing them an opportunity to comment. One (1) letter was received addressing the land partition. The concerns in the response addressed surface water runoff. Staff Response: Refer to the "Storm Drainage" section of Public Facility Concerns located on page 8. SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Land Partitions (18.420): The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; The proposed partition will comply with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations at the time of proposed development as demonstrated both by the analysis presented within this administrative decision and by this application and review process through compliance with the conditions of approval. Therefore, this criterion is met. There are adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal; Public facilities are discussed in detail later in this decision. Based on the analysis provided herein, staff finds that adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal. Therefore, this criterion is met. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards; and The public facilities and proposed improvements are discussed and conditioned later in this decision. Improvements will be reviewed as part of the permit process and during construction at which time the appropriate review authority will insure that City and applicable agency standards are met. Based on the analysis in this decision, staff finds that this criterion is met. All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below: The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. The minimum lot width required for the R-3.5 zoning district is 65 feet. Both lots have a width of 120 feet. Therefore, this standard has been met. The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area. The minimum lot area requirement in the R-3.5 zoning district is 10,000 square feet. The proposed NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION PAGE 4 OF 12 • • partition creates two lots that are 10,009 and 11,940 square feet respectively. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access easement. The proposed partition plat demonstrates that both lots will have frontage onto a public right-of-way. Parcel #1 has 104 feet of frontage onto SW Inez Street and Parcel #2 has 15 feet of frontage on SW Inez Street. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. No development is proposed with this application. The existing dwelling on Parcel #1 will not be in violation of applicable setbacks. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. The newly created lot will be a flag lot. According to the applicant, the flag lot will have the front of the dwelling oriented west. There will be a minimum of 10-foot setbacks on both sides. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. The applicant proposes to screen the newly created access drive to parcel 2 with existing fir trees along the west boundary of the access drive. Therefore, this standard has been met. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities. Fire district regulations are reviewed at time of development. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. No common drive is associated with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation. The applicant has proposed a 20-foot-wide access that has 10 feet of pavement. The plans show a 15-foot-wide access. According to Chapter 18.705, (Access, Egress and Circulation) the minimum requirement for residential zones is (1) access that is 15 feet wide with 10 feet of pavement. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred-year floodplain, the city shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. The partitioned lot is not adjacent to a one-hundred-year floodplain. Therefore, this standard does not apply. An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in accordance with Chapter 18.370, Variances and Adjustments. The applications for the partition NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION PAGE 5 OF 12 • • and variance(s)/adjustment(s) will be processed concurrently. No variances or adjustments have been submitted with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Land Partition standards have been met. Residential Zoning Districts (18.510): Development standards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2 below: TABLE 18.510.2 - (Cont'd.) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES STANDARD R-7 Parcel#1 Parcel#2 Minimum Lot Size -Detached unit 10,000 sq.ft. <10,000 sq.ft. <10,000 ft. -Duplexes -Attached unit[1] Average Minimum Lot Width -Detached unit lots 65 ft. 120 ft. 120 ft. -Duplex lots 90 ft. -Attached unit lots Maximum Lot Coverage - - - Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 20 ft. 30 ft. - -Side facing street on comer&through lots 15 ft. - - -Side yard 5 ft. 12 ft. - -Rear yard 15 ft. 36 ft. - -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district -Distance between property line and front of garage 20 ft. <20 ft. - Maximum Height 30 ft. >30 ft. - Minimum Landscape Requirement - - - [1]Single-family attached residential units permitted at one dwelling per lot with no more that five attached units in one grouping. [2]Lot coverage includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. * Multiple-family dwelling unit ** Single-family dwelling unit • Access. Egress and Circulation (18.705): • Access, Egress, and Circulation have been discussed earlier in this decision. Therefore, the criterion has been met. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION PAGE 6 OF 12 • • • • Density Computations (18.715): The standards for Density computation deal with the intensity of residential land uses, usually stated as the number of housing units er acre. The total square footage of the subject property is 22,549 square feet. The minimum density for this property is (1) unit; the maximum density is (2) units. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Density Computation Standards have been met. Tree Removal (18.790): A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot„ parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. The applicant has not proposed to remove any trees as a result of this partition. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the tree removal standards have been met. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): This Chapter requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight 8 feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight 8 feet are removed). A visual clearance area i s the triangular area formed by measuring a -foot distance points with a straight line. No obstructions have been proposed where the existing access connects to SW Inez Street. There is an existing 6-inch diameter Conifer Tree on the west side of the new access drive. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide evidence that the tree will be trimmed to a height no less than eight feet in order to satisfy the visual clearance standards. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the Vision Clearance Standards have not been met. If the applicant meets the condition below, the standards will be satisfied. CONDITION: Provide evidence that the tree located in the visual clearance area will be maintained to a height no less then 8 feet in height. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a local residential street to have a 50-foot right-of-way width and a 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION PAGE 7 OF 12 • • This site lies adjacent to SW Inez Street, which is classified as a local residential street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 20 feet of ROW south of the centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate additional ROW to provide 25 feet from the centerline. The applicant's materials indicate they will provide the dedication on the final plat. SW Inez Street is paved but not fully improved to City standards. TMC 18.810.030(A)(1) states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with City standards. However, 18.810.030(A)(4) states that the City may accept a future improvement guarantee in lieu of street improvements if the improvement associated with the project does not, by itself, provide a significant improvement to the street safety or capacity. Although this development will incrementally increase the amount of traffic on the roadway, the increase will not substantially degrade the level of service on the street. A street improvement adjacent to this site, therefore, will not significantly improve the safety or capacity of the street. In addition, 18.810.030(A)(1)(e) states that a guarantee in lieu of street improvements is acceptable if the proposal is a land partition on property zoned residential and the partition does not create any new streets. This partition will not create a new street. Based on these code provisions, Staff therefore recommends that the applicant be required to enter into an agreement with the City whereby the owner agrees to participate in any future widening project for the street carried out by the City, a third party, or through a local improvement district. This agreement must be executed prior to approval of the final plat. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. By executing the future improvement agreement for SW Inez Street, the applicant will satisfy this criteria. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line located in SW Inez Street that can serve this site. The applicant intends to tap the main line and extend a new service lateral to Parcel 2. The existing house on Parcel 1 is presently served by the public sewer. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There will not be a public storm drainage system within this project. Therefore, this criteria does not apply. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION PAGE 8 OF 12 • • • Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan indicates two options for disposal of stormwater from Parcel 2. One option is to install a drywell or soakage trench, where the stormwater would infiltrate into the soil. The other option is to obtain a private offsite storm drainage eagement and pump the onsite stormwater westerly to the existing public storm drainage pipe in SW 103 Avenue. Staff spoke with the Building Division regarding these options. Drywells and other infiltration systems are of a concern in Tigard, because they have a tendency of filling up during the winter and overflowing. The Building Division stated that if such a system were proposed, they would require the builder to install a pump system as a back-up incase the infiltration system overflowed. The pump would need to pump the water out to the public system; in this case, the water would have to be pumped to the existing public system in SW 103rd Avenue. In light of the fact that both options will require a pump, Staff recommends the applicant simply pump the storm water out to SW 103 Avenue and not install an infiltration system. Alternatively, the applicant could present another option that would have to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the Building Division. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeway is proposed or required with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. No bikeway is associated with this project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. No bikeway is proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operaing at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION PAGE 9 OF 12 • • • Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Inez Street. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 120 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $3,300. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site can be served from the existing public water line located in SW Inez Street. The applicant's plan indicates they will apply for a new water service to serve the new house on Parcel 2. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water qua ity facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The USA standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such as residential land partitions. It would be impractical to require an on-site water quality facility to accommodate treatment of the storm water from Parcel 2. Rather, the USA standards provide that applicants should pay a fee in-lieu of constructing a facility if deemed appropriate. Staff recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on this application. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Building Division may require a grading and erosion control plan when Parcel 2 is developed. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final plat. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. Survey Requirements The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION PAGE 10 OF 12 • • • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. City of Tigard Utility Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency comments have been discussed above under Public facility concerns. Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue has reviewed the proposal and offered the following statements: 1. The access lane to lot 2 shall have an all-weather, minimum 15-foot clear and unobstructed driving surface and shall be capable of supporting a 50,000 lb. Load. 2. A fire hydrant shall be located no more than 500 feet from the house on lot 2. 3. The fire hydrant shall be capable of providing a minimum fire flow of 1,000 gpm @ 20 psi. Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 14, 2000 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 29, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION PAGE 11 OF 12 • . Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 28, 2000. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. zed ' �L" - — August 14. 2000 PREPARED :�� ath-rich le degg: DATE Assistant Planner August 14. 2000 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewerst erff' DATE Planning Manager I/cu rpin/mathew/mlp/mI p2000-00005.dec NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT-INEZ PARTITION PAGE 12 OF 12 • CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT •DEPARTMENT . - CITY OF TIGARD APPLICANT: TROY SCHMIDT • 10190 S.W.INEZ STREET, TIGARD OR 97224 519-5420 °iAQ ASPHALT td + REPRESENTATIVE: URBAN VISIONS O DRIVEWAY i DRIVEWAY CULVERT 2123 S.E. t 2TH AVENUE N EOP S.W. INEZ STREET SUITE 2 EI.l01 S. _ I — _ _1 t 7 fr MANHOLE u.99.00 COLD, OR 97214 CONTACT: 7214IN 797-9567 EOF WATER EOP O EL.101.41 L Yu EL.99.10 LOCATION: 10190 S.W.INEZ STREET•N WAT • WAT TREE .:$g'g{'bQ:.a 120.0 S,ii, cuLYE1a STATE ID: 90502325 FD 3/41PYtdI� .. .� , • n.101.,0 _'l0' �.Y-..1;'40:,T'.. 105.0or'_ w ZONE:R-3.5(10,000 S.F.LOTS) -::Y;-,,!''.1.'yJ V' I - a� a - 5.0'WIDE -..'•^ � „��t="="p:?:'r;c,-•_ RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSAL: 2 LOT PARTITION WITH NO VARIANCES.EXISTING e• h Ir -•^:y,:-` :'` 'Z r3 ' T• -- DEDICATION DWELLING WILL REMAIN. >�iI / !=1, \81- / / AREA 600 S.F. • TREE :4ti' I I ;,,,,'�t.+ >�:...'1•'. -- I\a• PARCEL 1 CONNECTED TO PUBLIC SANITARY I I� �,�.:,,:,, �° , . '� SANITARY: •�.1.--3 „� ;;,�.'. --_7:_:,-1 n PARCEL 2 TO BE CONNECTED.TO PUBUC SANITARY Po „; WATER: PARCEL 1 CONNECTED-TO PUBLIC WATER la KW,1a`� PARCEL 2 TO BE CONNECTED TO PUBUC WATER I m1 , ��3.;”�..t;:,1 I must I STORM: PARCEL 1 DRAINS TO FLASH BLOCK SYSTEM • '. r::4•-C n PARCEL 2 TO DRAIN TO SOAKAGE TRENCH OR . • _�1 I - I I .- WILL BE PUMPED TO PUBLIC STORM LINE \� G''�" 1I IN S.W. 113TH RI I3 1 _ --�^ SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN ' �9 -0.400 �'3'L I\ � I OEGR LANDSCAPE PLAN: DENSITY CALCS: OVERALL SITE AREA: 22,548 S.F. ply ,°, I I I I . _ - - NO TREES TO BE REMOVED -EXISTING TREES TO BE PROTECTED WITH . DEDICATION AREA: 600 S.F. E„.„,31 Ld C1-'1� -' 0 _7 `- - ,2t' PARCEL 1 AREA: 10,009 S.F. r ��'1"ea.A ./o. PARCEL 1-- CONSTRUCTION FENCING AT DRIPUNE ,� I I I PARCEL 2 AREA 11,940 S.F. / — m .., 4e/AREA-10.009 S.F. - I - THERE IS NO PROPOSED PLANTING WITH / I , 9 •• / THIS PARTITION PARCEL 2 AREA • -NO IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS REQUIRED . LESS ACCESS POLE AREA): 10,507 S.F.DI ITAAi i' ''- ..?'i' // s -THERE VALL BE NO GRADING OR STOCKPILING F " L�`g / }.S e9m'oo E 105.00' I / OF TOPSOIL SOME INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON r''u1416Fto''.a' :Hip!��u'', ''�tw . -NO SOIL TREATMENT IS REWIRED SUPPLIED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER I'E'!ib'UI �trr ,'T W 1 / I`(AO PUBUC IMPROVMENTS/STREET PLAN: NO CONTOURS: APPROXIMATE 5%GRADE °I•'I1�1IENVP graFeF�P-Wpkrth . PARCEL 2 1 � 7 -NO HALF STREET IMPROVMENTS ARE PROPOSED "J1� ri1,�"I 1i T`*` 1�,+f}E��N'y(a' t � CLUSI[R AREA-H.940 S/. 3- � }< itt- J 1 :-I r •i°4 / GRADING/EROSION CONTROL PLAN:• 1,L V 1 J'1 1 . AREA=IO,e07 S.F.W TKOUT FLAG POLE -'� `'rb4 n -; `id r1 V7 /� 06 - GRADING WILL BE LIMITED TO SOIL RE-DISTRIBUTION DA W� ,13 1cf'j•In"'(yETL+ G_ ,,y 9• ,�t/ n, TO ACHIEVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM FOUNDATION. s'', `• l k=1.13° ,y. P I 1 G aUS� f'I\y' THERE WILL BE NO GRADING ON THE SITE GREATER THAN 4 INCHES. ^+, do qYf n•1 �'' Z I _ -EROSION CONTROL FENCING WILL SURROUND CONSTRUCTION AREA. X999F.„r1 1�;)�1-'E ,p N It,'.rjElrmti.7y.`r w �' Y cW d %,,n. ,„_ y GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WILL BE UTILIZED. / SnrW..0 7'1•,.1 71•.I t'4C<F 7j - \' v 1 to TREE PRESERVATION PLAN: Y /.... ,_i,. 3L�1F '• ti.vu�. r i - c 6 -EXISTING TREES TO BE PROTECTED WITH CONSTRUCTION V ' iY• 'FIY�'3 hal'` E`ts ;1 • I I _ \'Br • 9 i/ FENCING AT DRIPUNE. ,'r''4;5�;:�;-� ;10.7=•._-'� k�`:.bai?`. ?I:, / A \I i � '�` SIC D QU�g / - VICINITY MAP • IE . NOT TO SCALE _ o GOe = 7 b�§le_ -� d TENTATIVE PLAN _ TAX LOT 2200, 2S 1W 11ec -a K 0j x / , 1rpQ. s 3�� N.W.J�1 EC. 11, 7.2S., R.1W., W.M. — —SAN— —a.moo—//Tt.�[�A vs_ ` Sl f . /—EL gas—SAN— — (`J° — —.- iD 3/4.1° I / CITY OF TIGARD III < ) EL.91.40 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON • . <`\ JANUARY 26, 2000 '' Centerline Concepts Inc. • - �G DRAWN BY:MPW CHECKED BY:WGOIII QP SCALE 1e• 30' ACCOUNT #150-3726 640 82nd Drive Gladstone, Oregon 97027 M:\BND\SCHMIDTJ726\SCHMIDTSC 503 650-0188 ton 503 650-0189 • SCHMIDT INEZ PARTITION . CITY of TIGARD . SITE PLAN N . • MLP2000-00005 - (Map is not to scale) _ CITY of TIGARD JANZEN , _ELROSE ; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM IT 0 f[ VICINITY MAP i F� SCHMIDiNEZ �� PARTITION / ~ MLP2000-00005 m m • C ----___ , , VIE\ALTERR_ - rr� - INF7 ST , L \\X" CANT-BREW- L • 8 r i SUBJECT SITE L , w i PEMBROOK ST . Q 1 = - A 0 I _ _L7 iii i Iilii N , ---M�R OC K ._-- ST B0 100 200 300 400 Feet r 11 1"=301 feet Q _-1 8 0 8 = !. 'l r > City of Tigard . .. -8 o Q _.� _DE ^A' Q r LH Information on this map is for general location only and m L _1.E_MO VTE_ hould be verified with the Development Services Division. C 13125 SW Hall Blvd CO Ch Tigard,OR 97223■0 .,_ ® t— _ (503)639-4171 tJl m m `� I OQ httpafwwa.ci.tigard.or.us , 'I ` �eY Plot date:Jul 3,2000;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR Community Development • • w EXHIBIT B Troy Schmidt MLP2000-00005 10190 SW Inez Street SCHMIDT INEZ PARTITION Tigard, OR 97223 Corbin Shays/Urban Visions 2123 SE 12th Avenue Portland, OR 97214 • Randy Wilder 14541 SW 100th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 • -- BEEP" 0� _ - •• G0 u OF TiGiy, ,� �� PM lP .— - C71 fr:.'1_1_/PLANINiG DIV. cr TIGARD, OR 97223 ® 2000 ....�_.-..._. .� �=- . L g/d-I 2.t c.p �o 'o- o�oo-�' �,i,,,.. ,,mac t .i,�.�z. /2s 1BC-0460 ea Gc.s c'e�. GOTTER S UEL A&VICTORIA L 131ST-AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 GOTT580* 972242018 1799 16 08/16/00 • FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND GOTTER 10125 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD OR 97224-4761 I ` S .*: : I 11,1,.1,►;1.,1,11.1111;1111,1. 11, llsl1 11u11 „111 1 r , i • , . , • .• iik • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING TY°'''c CITY OF TIGARD Community rDeve(opment Shaping Better Community STAr1<E OF OREGON- ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Shirley L. Treat, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist I for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Cfed(Appropriate Box(s)Below} ® NOTICE OE PENDING APPLICATION FOR: i7 IMLP12000-00005/SCHMIDT INEZ PARTITION ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (Type/Kind of Notice) (File No/Name Reference) (14-Day Comment Period) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF TYPE I DECISION FOR:i7 O AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING FOR: E:7. ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ . City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer • ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICES] of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit'B",on July 3. 2000, and deposited in the United States Mail on July 3. 2000,postage prepaid. ,11 Li ii,1 l fi ((erson that Prepared Notice) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the �i day of ,�_�.. _ , 20i') )..it '..ii / "Illri.‘./iiiL OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGO t~5° DIANE M JELDERKS c�/P. `'' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My Commission Expires: / 7 1 5 "� COMMISSION NO.326578 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHO.R,VENDOR OR SELLER: • THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION LAND PARTITION CITY OF TIGARD Community Deveropment Shaping Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: July 3, 2000 FILE NUMBER: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2000-00005 FILE NAME: SCHMIDT INEZ PARTITION PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting to partition one existing lot of 22,548 square feet into two lots of 10,009 and 11,940 square feet with a 600 sq. foot dedication. ZONE: R-3.5: Low—Density Residential District_ The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18. 390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, 18.810. LOCATION: 10190 SW Inez Street; WCTM 2S111 BC, Tax Lot 02200. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON JULY 18. 2000. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheidegger. Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST 10, 2000. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ ,Comments that provide the basilpr an appeal to the Tigard Planning •emission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. • INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." I I I / `'' I a VICINITY MAP r I SCHMIDT INEZ - ) là Iii PARTITION tprpri MLP2000-00005 <� m ,> ' ,a. TERR Mali N T 4i ... =11 ■ SUBJECT SITE) _ I I PEMBROOK_ST I�I III • _]OD ®° N _ D• ■ / M liii '°° -OM 0 IDS s J W t8 _.1 ? .....ar.vfTi rand � .- LL sea+l*p.va 1 m DF MONTE]R " — e .�Ma�. 13123 OW w.aa ®® m m µ .c.b.on c,va 1 F■ xirvwu, I>> lil_iIo .- • • Troy Schmidt 10190 SW Inez Street SCHMIDT INEZ PARTITION Tigard, OR 97223 MLP2000-00005 Corbin Shays/Urban Visions 2123 SE 12th Avenue Portland, OR 97214 2S 111 CB-00102 • 2s 111BCO2401 • ALEXANDER RONALD E CROSS ROGER K III&CLARE E MARY T 10155 SW MURDOCK ST 10150 SW MURDOCK TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 S 111 CB-00104 2S 111 BC-02300 AL • DER RONA • FANTZ GARY E AND GAY MARY 14530 SW 103RD AVE 1015• : •ROCK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,OR 972 ' 25111 BC-01300 2S 111 CB-00103 BAILEY AUNDRIA E FOSTER CRAIG A&CAREN 10150 SW VIEW TERRACE 10200 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 25111 BC-02000 25111 BC-02700 BAKER JAMES WILBUR GLEAVES GREGORY L&JONETTE HELENE 10380 SW CANTERBURY LN 10070 SW INEZ ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 BC-01000 2S 111 B C-04600 BAUMAN C WAYNE GOTTER SAMUEL A&VICTORIA L MARY 17580 SW 131ST AVE 10270 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 25111 BC-03800 25111 BC-01900 BERTULEIT MIRIAM R/DANIEL TRS HANSEN DOUGLAS V&CHERI L 10390 SW VIEW TERRACE ST 14535 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S11 1 BC-00200 2S1 11 BC-04500 BOGERT MARK H AND HENERY JOSEPH J& MARY E BACCELLIERI FRANCES D 14445 SW 100TH 10700 SW BEAV-HLSDL HWY#585 • TIGARD,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 25111 BC-01400 25111 BC-00100 BUEHLER GREGORY J&SARA L HIGGINS PETER B JOANNE C 10145 SW VIEW TER 14345 SW 100TH TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 CB-00101 2S 111 BA-02500 BUSH PATRICIA LYNN HODLER DON R& 10250 SW MURDOCK ST HODLER ARTHUR T& TIGARD,OR 97224 HODLER CARL H 14470 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-02503 2S 111 BC-01100 CORLISS JAMES UCORA K KARPSTEIN GREGORY A& 9750 SW INEZ KARPSTEIN BRIAN A& TIGARD,OR 97223 ELLERMEIER JEAN 10220 SW VIEW TERR TIGARD,OR 97224 • • • • 25111 BB-00900 2S111 BC-01500 KASTEL CHARLES G&MARY J TRS MUDROW MICHAEL T&DIANE C 14259 SW 100TH 10185 SW VIEW TERR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-02100 2S 111 BC-02302 LITTLETON DAVID A AND WANDA J NOKES JOHN RICHARD&EVELYN J 10090 SW INEZ 14650 SW 103RD AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BA-02400 2S 111 BC-02303 LYNN CHARLES W NOKES KATHY EVELYN WILMA L 14600 SW 103RD 14350 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-01800 2S 111 BC-00600 MALCOMSON ROBERT TANYA PARTINGTON BRIGITTE ANNE 14525 SW 100TH 10085 SW INEZ ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 25111 BC-00500 2S111 BC-00300 MARSHALL JAMES H&ANNETTE L PERKINS VERN&SHERYL L 10055 SW INEZ ST 14415 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S11 1 BC-00900 2S1 11 BC-02800 MATIAS CATHLEEN F PRESBYTERY OF PORTLAND THE 14480 SW 103RD AVE CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH TIGARD,OR 97224 10445 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-02501 2S 111 BC-03200 MAYS KENNETH W&KARLEEN R PRUETT MARTHA 10115 SW MURDOCK ST 10335 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-00700 2S1 11 BD-00301 MCBRIDE GLEN W&JANET M QUINN DONALD R JR 10135 SW INEZ SHIRLEY A TIGARD,OR 97224 14530 SW 100TH TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 BC-04000 2S1 11 BC-03900 MILLER JUDITH A&PAUL E TRS RAUDY BEVERLY 10330 SW VIEW TER 10360 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 • 2S 111 BC-02500 2S 111 BB-01000 MILROY JOHN T AND SHIRLEY REEDER MARY R 1102 NW SPRINGBROOK RD STE 251 14300 SW 103RD AVE NEWBERG,OR 97132 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 2S 111 BC-00800 2S 111 BC-04200 RENICK ALVIN W AND CARLA M WESTENHAVER DANA A&MARY LYN T 10175 SW INEZ 14563 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BD-00310 2S 111 BC-04400 ROMMEL WILLIAM R WILDER RANDY A&JANETTE L DEANNA L COCHRAN BOYD C&WANDA J 14570 SW 100TH ST WESTENHAVER DANA L&MARY LYN TRS TIGARD,OR 97223 14563 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 25111 BC-01600 25111 BC-04300 SARGANT FRANCIS J RUTH WILDER RANDY A/JANETTE L 10225 SW VIEW TERRACE 14541 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111 BC-02200 2S 111 BC-04100 SCHMIDT TROY M&SUSAN L YARNELL R ROSS&MELINDA D 10190 SW INEZ ST 14587 SW 100TH TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-01200 SEARS ALLEN C Go WILLIAMS GRANT&LANA 10190 SW VIEW TER TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BD-00311 SHANNON LAWRENCE S JOAN JENNIE 9970 SW PEMBROOK TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 BC-01700 STACK RICHARD W JUDITH C 10265 SW VIEW TERR TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 CB-02700 THOMAS DONALD W BONNIE L 14940 SW 103RD TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-02600 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT 8841 SW COMMERCIAL TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 BC-00400 UNTALAN JOSE C&JUANITA F TRUSTEES 14485 SW 100TH TIGARD,OR 97224 . _ • • • . Sally Christensen Bill Find( 15685 SW 166 Avenue 9235 SW Mountain View Lane Tigard, OR 91224 Tigard, OR 91224 Mary Ann Melvin Kristen Miller 10395 SW Bonanza Way 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 91224 Tigard, OR 91223 Stephen Bicker CITY OF TIGARD 14235 SW 9r Avenue SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 91224 Mark Bogert 14445 SW 100th Avenue is\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc UPDATED: 9-Jun-00 Tigard, OR 91224 Twyla Brady 9360 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 91223 Debra Muir 15065 SW 19th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Siebold 15314 SW Thurston Lane Tigard, OR 91224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 91281 Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt. #3 Tigard, OR 91224-3316 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 91224 asTf!i REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIIGARD Community cDeve(opment Shaping Better Community DATE: July 3,2000 TO: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner(x311] Phone: (503)639-4171/Fax: (503)684-1291 MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2000-00005 ➢ SCHMIDT INEZ PARTITION Q The applicant is requesting to partition one existing lot of 22,548 square feet into two lots of 10,009 and 11,940 square feet with a 600 sq. foot dedication. LOCATION: 10190 SW Inez Street; WCTM 25111 BC, Tax Lot 02200. ZONE: R-3.5: Low—Density Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18. 390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795, 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 18,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If You are unable to respond blithe above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information)Name of Perseids)Commenting: I I Phone Number[sl: MLP2000-00005/SCHMIDT INEZ PARTITION REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CIF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS . NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE&COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS • 4 n • FILE NOLSI: -227/sP� -m, S FILE NAMEISI: .� c,c- -,/_! .cc ' CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS I4-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: Central ❑ East ❑ South`® West ❑ Q Also Place For Review in library CIT Book . CITY OFFICES ��//� _LONG RANGE PLANNING/Nadine Smith,Supervisor COMMUNITY DVLPMNT. DEPT./Dvlpmnt Svcs.Technicians `�-POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer BUILDING DIVISION/Gary lampella,Building Official (>4-ENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,Dvlpmnt Review Engineer WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,Utilities Manager CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder _OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,Property Manager PLANNER—TIME TO POST PROJECT SITE! SPECIAL DISTRICTS TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC. DIST.* TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE * p(TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT *c UNIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program 15101 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 145 155 N.First Street Beaverton,OR 91006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 91075 Hillsboro,OR 91124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS• ' CITY OF BEAVERTON* _ CITY OF TUALATIN * • _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street,NE Irish Bunnell,Development Services PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97301-1279 • PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING* _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street,NE _ CITY OF DURHAM* 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. • Durham,OR 97281-3483 ' _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP_333 SW First Avenue _ Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA/ZOA) Larry French(Comp.Plan Amendments Only) PO Box 2946 _CITY OF KING CITY* • _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager Salem,OR 97301-2540 15300 SW 116th Avenue WASHINGTON COUNTY King City,OR 97224 _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powedmes in Area) _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO* Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Planning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 _Brent Curtis(CPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Scott King(CPA) OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * _Mike Borreson(Engineer) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) _Sonya Kazen,Development Review Coordinator _Jim Tice()GA) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir. . Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) _Steve Conway(General Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders Q€Phil Healy(General Apps.) 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Sr.Cartographer(cPArzcA)MS to Portland,OR 97204 _Jim Nims(ZCA)MS 15 _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A* _Doria Mateja(ZCA)Ms 14 Jane Estes,Permit Specialist 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 h:tpatty\masters1Request For Comments Notification List.doc (Revised: 21-Apr-00) Portland,OR 97221-2414 ' UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES , _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W.10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 •SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.RJR _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Pat McGann (If Project is Within'/.Mile of A Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Michael Kiser,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 . _PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY _GENERAL TELEPHONE _ US WEST COMMUNICATIONS . Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer Elaine Self,Engineering Lori Dorney,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue MC: 0R030546 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 • Portland,OR 97209-3991 Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _TCI CABLE(Apps.E.ott+aIVN.of99W) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Joy-Gay Pahl,Demographs&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter . 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006 Portland,OR 97232 *INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION INCOMPLIANCE WITHJNTERGOYERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHINS.00'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). JUN-14-00 WED,.07:05 URB VISIONS • FAX NO. 50'9568 P. 02/02 06/13/00 14:56 '350,4 7297 CITY'OF TIf.:ART) V1002/002 ,3 • CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION cmr_Of 11GARD Community rDeuclaprtaltt 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD Slcapurg,n t9ett.er C.ommultity TIGARD, OREGON 91223 PRONE: 503-6394171 FAY 503-684.7297(per: Patty or Shirley/P1anr<ing) REQUEST F O �� R All NG� 1. 4 Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX 1 T NSL UMBERS (Le 1Sl340.Tax Lot 00100)OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW and INCLUDE A MAP OF ALL LOTS FOR THE PROJECT (preferably assessor's tax map): /.J ... �w /ha- f r* ter- ZZ.00 ZS !v //CC. 2 y gA. 4-`sr 0,441 INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTING 2 OR 3 SETS OF LABELS: S_r s PE4-sz x1.7067) (NOTE: A minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided to place on your 2 sets of envelopes that appfiants are required to submit at the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood meeting is required and you have not yet held that meeting,you should request 3 sets) NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: gia4s PHONE: 7 7 • 7 This request may be mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the Gty of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request in " Hill Call" by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. Cost Description: $11 to generate the mailing list, plus$2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels (20 addresses per sheet). Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. *EXAMPLE* * * COST FOR THIS REQUEST * * 4_sheets of labels x S2/sheet= SIL0.0 x Z sets = $16.00 S sheets of labels x$2/sheet= $ x Rots = :24.2__shaeri of labels x$2/sheet for CIT area x 1 sets = $4.00 1 sheets of labels x$2/sheet foyCiT area = 5 x sets = . GENERATE LIST = $J(,00 5' GENERATE LIST = $11.9,0_ TOTAL = $31.00 TOTAL = SA - -�_�■' CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM *: AREA NOTIFIED t,M1M0W00 A, 28mBB00900 D ' (500')n., ,, CO170! <25111BC01500, A',"'„.,,,, ,. ,•A'-,,','A 'A A .,,,t, Illi ' tsrnecoim� ssolsll couo ,,ismscomoo ,,, ' V II' , 251118COi8)0 BC040 0 COW BBgp o STB000 00` zryl,soi0o na0,2.40 1511180028∎0 . . _ g ttmc0110, FOR: Corbin Shays 5118001200 :SUBJECT '_: • °° °� °°�� RE: 2S I I 1 60, 1200 .mBeesoa .` 4 00070 '° COOS 0 SITE , ., ,. _ , dIE 281110002800 ■ T IIIMfI !`► 'q'a ., �I�I tam9eotloo .8°i0° 2smBCOio Property owner information A �� - tsmecoTSOO is valid for 3 months from p.% ., �1\\\ '*, ., the date printed on this ma � J � ,. �i,, 5,,,9004100 mull •• tanieca270o w :. OOBn, _ CO2i0 , tam9coti92 tsmacaioo •v ,25mBc0420o 25111BC0410 1 iiiiiiirt4 IIII _ Q Mal - ,. �,a,..T ', €_ 'x '� 8001 _ — tsttIBC04500 0048 lsiTlBCOtB00 . . p �a 25mBCO2507 Elliin 281t1BCO2500 Cat l 0025 11 RDOCK 1.11111 1111VAII.,.. ' ;:,*•:,-.'' • '?",,, tsmceom 80,010 gEll El L1.1 IIIIII Q , N MI 2 � _■ �� ,,., 0 100 200 300 400 Feet _ _ 41 1"=277 feet , p—r— iii �. Q lil • tames°aoo . m L _DE .1 • T II ■ • I?!� CO® O .v _' City of Tigard 111111 Nit .1 _„r .{ Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. ■ - 13125 SW Hall Blvd -_ Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 httpJfwww.ci.ligard.o d.or.us Plot date:Jun 19,2000;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR Community Development • • / OF ) 2S 111 CB-00102 2S 111 BC-02401 ALEXANDER RONALD E CROSS ROGER K III&CLARE E MARY T 10155 SW MURDOCK ST 10150 SW MURDOCK TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 S111 CB-00104 25111 BC-02300 AL • •NDER RONA • FANTZ GARY E AND GAY MARY 14530 SW 103RD AVE 10150 : • BOCK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,OR 972 2S 111 BC-01300 2S 111 C8-00103 BAILEY AUNDRIA E FOSTER CRAIG A&CAREN 10150 SW VIEW TERRACE 10200 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-02000 2S 111 BC-02700 BAKER JAMES WILBUR GLEAVES GREGORY L&JONETTE • HELENE 10380 SW CANTERBURY LN 10070 SW INEZ ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 BC-01000 2S 111 BC-04600 BAUMAN C WAYNE GOTTER SAMUEL A&VICTORIA L MARY 17580 SW 131ST AVE 10270 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 BC-03800 2S 111 BC-01900 BERTULEIT MIRIAM R/DANIEL TRS HANSEN DOUGLAS V&CHERI L 10390 SW VIEW TERRACE ST 14535 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 11 BC-00200 2S1 11 BC-04500 BOGERT MARK H AND HENERY JOSEPH J& MARY E BACCELLIERI FRANCES D 14445 SW 100TH 10700 SW BEAV-HLSDL HWY#585 TIGARD,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 2S 111 BC-01400 2S 111 BC-00100 BUEHLER GREGORY J&SARA L HIGGINS PETER B JOANNE C 10145 SW VIEW TER 14345 SW 100TH TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 CB-00101 2S 111 BA-02500 BUSH PATRICIA LYNN HODLER DON R& 10250 SW MURDOCK ST HODLER ARTHUR T& TIGARD,OR 97224 HODLER CARL H 14470 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 25111 BC-02503 25111 BC-01100 CORLISS JAMES UCORA K KARPSTEIN GREGORY A& 9750 SW INEZ KARPSTEIN BRIAN A& TIGARD,OR 97223 ELLERMEIER JEAN 10220 SW VIEW TERR TIGARD,OR 97224 • • • 2S111 BB-00900 2S111 BC-01500 KASTEL CHARLES G&MARY J TRS MUDROW MICHAEL T&DIANE C 14259 SW 100TH 10185 SW VIEW TERR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-02100 2S 111 BC-02302 LITTLETON DAVID A AND WANDA J NOKES JOHN RICHARD&EVELYN J . 10090 SW INEZ 14650 SW 103RD AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111 BA-02400 25111 BC-02303 LYNN CHARLES W NOKES KATHY EVELYN WILMA L 14600 SW 103RD 14350 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 25111 BC-01800 2S111 BC-00600 MALCOMSON ROBERT TANYA PARTINGTON BRIGITTE ANNE 14525 SW 100TH 10085 SW INEZ ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 BC-00500 2S1 11 BC-00300 MARSHALL JAMES H&ANNETTE L PERKINS VERN&SHERYL L 10055 SW INEZ ST 14415 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 11 BC-00900 2S1 11 BC-02800 MATIAS CATHLEEN F PRESBYTERY OF PORTLAND THE 14480 SW 103RD AVE CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH TIGARD,OR 97224 10445 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-02501 2S 111 BC-03200 MAYS KENNETH W&KARLEEN R PRUETT MARTHA 10115 SW MURDOCK ST 10335 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-00700 2S 111 B D-00301 MCBRIDE GLEN W&JANET M QUINN DONALD R JR 10135 SW INEZ SHIRLEY A TIGARD,OR 97224 14530 SW 100TH TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1 11 BC-04000 2S 111 BC-03900 MILLER JUDITH A&PAUL E TRS RAUDY BEVERLY 10330 SW VIEW TER 10360 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-02500 2S 111 BB-01000 MILROY JOHN T AND SHIRLEY REEDER MARY R 1102 NW SPRINGBROOK RD STE 251 14300 SW 103RD AVE NEWBERG,OR 97132 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 2S1 11 BC-00800 2S1 11 BC-04200 RENICK ALVIN W AND CARLA M WESTENHAVER DANA A&MARY LYN T 10175 SW INEZ 14563 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 B D-00310 2S 111 BC-04400 ROMMEL WILLIAM R WILDER RANDY A&JANETTE L DEANNA L COCHRAN BOYD C&WANDA J 14570 SW 100TH ST WESTENHAVER DANA L&MARY LYN TRS TIGARD,OR 97223 14563 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-01600 2S 111 BC-04300 SARGANT FRANCIS J RUTH WILDER RANDY A/JANETTE L 10225 SW VIEW TERRACE 14541 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 111 BC-02200 2S 111 BC-04100 SCHMIDT TROY M&SUSAN L YARNELL R ROSS&MELINDA D 10190 SW INEZ ST 14587 SW 100TH TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111 BC-01200 SEARS ALLEN C c/o WILLIAMS GRANT&LANA 10190 SW VIEW TER TIGARD,OR 97224 2S111BD-00311 SHANNON LAWRENCE S JOAN JENNIE 9970 SW PEMBROOK TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 111 BC-01700 STACK RICHARD W JUDITH C 10265 SW VIEW TERR TIGARD,OR 97224 • 2S111 CB-02700 THOMAS DONALD W BONNIE L 14940 SW 103RD TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 11 BC-02600 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT 8841 SW COMMERCIAL TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S111 BC-00400 UNTALAN JOSE C&JUANITA F TRUSTEES 14485 SW 100TH TIGARD,OR 97224 • � Sally Christensen Bill Finck 15685 SW 16th Avenue 9235 SW Mountain View Lane Tigard, OR 91224 Tigard, OR 91224 Mary Ann Melvin Kristen Miller 10395 SW Bonanza Way 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 91224 Tigard, OR 91223 Stephen Bicker CITY OF TIGARD 14235 SW 91th Avenue SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 91224 Mark Bogert 14445 SW 100th Avenue is\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc UPDATED: 9-Jun-00 Tigard, OR 91224 Twyla Brady 9360 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 91223 Debra Muir 15065 SW 19t Avenue Tigard, OR 91224 Sue Siebold 15314 SW Thurston Lane Tigard, OR 91224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 91281 Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt. #3 Tigard, OR 91224-3316 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 91224 • Customer Receipt CITY OF TIGARD Printed:06/28/2000 13:50 User: kristie Station: 02 Operator: KJP Rcpt No: 0003340 Date: 06/28/2000 Customer No:000000 Amount Due: 27.00 • Name: CORBIN SHAYS Cash: 0.00 Address: 2123 SE 12TH AVE Check: 27.00 PORTLAND, OR 97214 N/A 0.00 Change: 0.00 Type Description Amount RECEXP Recovered Expenditures 27.00 • 0 • June 28, 2000 Co O ev, Corbin Shays '. 2123 SE 12th Avenue Portland, OR 97214 i 1 RE: Notice of Complete Application Submittal Dear Mr. Shays: ' The City has reviewed your submittal material and finds that you application is complete. Staff will now review your application forl_and Partition Approval. A decision will be rendered within 5-6 weeks. e I am available to answer questions and otherwise assist you as maybe required at 639-4171, extension 317. Office hours are from 8:00 a.rn to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. If I am not available, please leave Your name and phone number so that I can call you as soon as possible. \ Sincerely, \\ Mathew Scheidegger Assistant Planner 1\cu rpin\mathew\mIp\MLP2000-00005.acc.acc.doc Enclosure c: - MLP2000-00005 Land use file • i P -s- PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN CHECKLIST . Project: -"---.44111-7"C PAf-Tr T`a-1 FOR Date: LAND USE APPLICATION SUBMITTALS • E C MPLETE ❑INCOMPLETE GRADING 1 1" Existing and proposed contours shown? [v]' Are adjacent parcels impacted by proposed grading? ❑ Yes [/No Adjacent parcel grades shown? STREET ISSUES Vy' Right-of-way clearly shown? Centerline of street clearly shown? [r Name of street(s) shown? [r, Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown? [3 Profiles of proposed streets 014 Future Streets Plan_ provided? (subdivisions and some partitions) El profiles • El topo shown on adjacent property? •�� Traffic study required/submitted? [r Do proposed street grades comply with City standards? • gAR Check widths proposed on public streets Are private streets proposed? • El under 6 lot minimum? ❑ commercial driveway entrance required. El width appropriate? . ['Other: • SANITARY SEWER ISSUES Er. Existing/proposed lines? • • ,[�. a Stubs to adjacent parcels required? WATER ISSUES ❑' Existing/proposed lines? • 0/ Existing/proposed fire hydrants? STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES [r Existing/proposed lines? r -'- -- • � �A Preliminary sizing calculation of water quality.provided? • 0-14 Water quality facility shown on plan? • ,. El does area provided match calculations for size requirement? ,EltiP, Stubs to adjacent properties required? JJ-�P-Water quality and/or detention shown outside of any wetland buffer? • i1eng\brianranasters\public facility plan checklist.doc APPUCANT: TROY SCHMIDT 10190 S.W. INEZ STREET, ' TIGARD OR 97224 519-5420 (a+AVEL ASPHALT \ 10'CONCRETE REPRESENTATIVE: URBAN VISIONS DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY CULVERT 2123 S.E. 12TH AVENUE ° EDP -1.16, EOP S.W. INEZ STREET SUITE 2 • — EL 101.54 _ _ > SAN-1-MANHOLE — PTLD, OR 97214 EL.99.40 Em CONTACT: CORBIN p EL 101.41 WATER EP, 797-9567 wer N e' �'.^r,2. - >- i AL,��. .E EL 99.30 LOCATION: 10190 S.W. INEZ STREET THEE '?"X' . °'".-:.'' 1.U.OU' ►, WAT STATE ID: R0502325 ��E �ti�� CULVERT FD 3/49P SC I EL 101.12 "'IO '::'v:•:,µ�f�zllyii.;x.. 105.0r, 294 <' / R-3.5 10,000 S.F. LOTS .:.cam:.:_ z;4:: ff - s 5- ZONE ( LOTS) K.,:;,;r� ,.,..s 5.0' WIDE J ;'"""4+j'f`: 0 b - RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSAL 2 LOT PARTITION WITH NO VARIANCES. EXISTING e' / ,ir r -1,;�N • �3 / T' � DEDICATION DWEWNG WILL REMAIN. TREE '::%.1i,'ii'i 1. '.'i• \S '' / I I\/ 1\ AREA 600 S.F. • �•;:3:. _ SANITARY: PARCEL 1 CONNECTED TO PUBUC SANITARY co, . .•�.1 i1.` '^:" ____::::=7.-:-.-_:::_51 PARCEL 2 TO BE CONNECTED TO PUBLIC SANITARY F7 's'ww,. imlr1 I ,i' .Y,., (- WATER: PARCEL 1 CONNECTED TO PUBLIC WATER s.9 y i;.::;.; _':; I I PARCEL 2 TO BE CONNECTED TO PUBUC WATER CRI T i s;.1 M V i`: I HOUSE 1 co STORM: PARCEL 1 DRAINS TO FLASH BLOCK SYSTEM ■�1 = r:�%w' I ^ PARCEL 2 TO DRAIN TO SOAKAGE TRENCH OR WILL BE PUMPED TO PUBLIC STORM UNE ■\ - y3'o 1I _ IN S.W. 113TH I ii I --1,-;-...-c.7_ - SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN f : c 7 \1 ■{ oEck - ' LANDSCAPE PLAN: DENSITY OVERALL SITE AREA: 22,548 S.F. �•5n f I j 1 - NO TREES TO BE REMOVED I .„; L 1`! ` 121' - EXISTING TREES TO BE PROTECTED WITH DEDICATION AREA: 600 S.F. -�j _7 PARCEL 1 AREA: 10,009 S.F. / I �p1°'"+q I N7 PARCEL 1 I CONSTRUCTION FENCING AT DRIPUNE / m / _ - I - THERE IS NO PROPOSED PLANTING WITH PARCEL 2 AREA: 11,940 S.F. / I " , �� 1i9 S.F / THIS PARTITION PARCEL 2 AREA n a,, a. .q..; / - NO IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS REQUIRED LESS ACCESS POLE AREA). 10,507 S.F. ■1 ��" , Cq` �'A�ss I S 8931'00'E _ - THERE WILL BE NO GRADING OR STOCKPILING • >r m ;e0'4r ,, t�Y., ..4`',a. 105.00' I / OF TOPSOIL a tti SOME INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON zX1Ni,C.,�w"∎1 sT:,;•4'1x - NO SOIL TREATMENT IS REQUIRED °Li�� gyTe11R ,41',' ha;..?,SWaEO%5:;c)•ND W 1 1 SUPPLIED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER r 1®r n '�� MM • -UNOCHALF STREETSIMPROWENTS ARE PROPOSED NO CONTOURS; APPROXIMATE 5%GRADE - . 19:1.•.4 t a0 PARCEL 2 1 1 7 AREA=11,940 S.F. / r.r � 1Y +�^r; :. q�-�AREA�to,saT sF.wnHOUr FtAC Pow _o� GRADING/EROSION CONTROL PLAN: N - GRADING WILL BE LIMITED TO SOIL RE-DISTRIBUTION " '. * "® P / TO ACHIEVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM FOUNDATION. r49 �/t &,, ``_P+.1"� L I / _ THERE WILL BE NO GRADING ON THE SITE GREATER THAN 4 INCHES. ;;;,,r,' C _ •t!b"8i"khii8 to z ! I I /7 0 - EROSION CONTROL FENCING WILL SURROUND CONSTRUCTION AREA. i ��„�,.,, •.^ µ w„7,„,10 a - ,I� I ��v�� N GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WILL BE UTILIZED. I :' `{<Q £ .;r . "'Tit, ' �� o TREE PRESERVATION PLAN: M •Jy�.�•• eu:n.. \ - - EXISTING TREES TO BE PROTECTED WITH CONSTRUCTION V c °43• �!�fi0�wi0 YI _, I - — i� FENCING AT DRIPLINE. VICINITY MAP I ! / NOT TO SCALE 1 - TENTATIVE PLAN TAX LOT 2200, 2S 1W »ec —SAN— —FD EL.2/490—//__ ••\�IN '• S�O /I„�I�I f VX\\_,,/_Fr)3/C P SAN— N.W. 4 SECS 11 Te 2S., R�1 W., W.M. — FD 3/4'IP I I PFR TS-UII TS < > EL 91.40 CITY OF TIGARD 111 ,P WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON JANUARY 26, 2000 t<<>, A Centerline Concepts Inc. �G DRAWN BY: MPW CHECKED BY: WGDIII g s SCALE 1"=30' ACCOUNT #150-3726 640 82nd Drive Gladstone, Oregon 97027 M:\BND\SCHMIDT3726\SCHMIDTSC 503 650-0188 fox 503 650-0189 04/28/00 FRI 13:09 FAX 503 51960 CITY OF TIGARD 0 002 0 LAND PARTITION. ,.41k 11 :i_— TYPE I I APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX:(503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: DATE E O OF PRE-APP.: PP.: Property Address/Location(s): /0/90 Sw ..r...4:...-2 zr: D5��1 �� FOR STAFF USE ONLY 2.S'/( ac tx5 . � - Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): 2-Zo43' 24--/3' '//84' Case No.(s): IA, _ , • bL I JI III Site Size: ."2.2-, $•gf$ sop-I—. Other Case No.(s): Mg Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: TR°y Tc4" SOT Receipt No.; ®�av�`�g 3 Application Accepted By:(4- Address: /.D/9a S 44 Z.."2 3T: Phone: Date: ‘5--,AG,-Oct City: T'4 i+'i4 Zip: 77 2-z3 Applicant*: 60.442/Ad S.1444 VS / 44.44,v vi °NS Date Determined To Be Complete: Address: Z.z 3 3E 0'714 Ala. Phone: 7 9 7 • `}S G7 City: Po0L'72.4'V'C) a'� Zip: 9? L/ Comp Plan/Zone Designation: * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the CIT Area: applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession Recording Date and Number: with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written Rev11/26/98 i:tcurpinlmastersliandpart.doc authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY , The owners of record of the subject property request permission to REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS allow a Land Partition to: divide 11/ S ?8 into r w n ✓ Application Elements Submitted: (total area) (#of parcels) ❑ Application Form containing 1°. °d 6 and /', 999 fi ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization (sq. ft. or acres) (sq. ft. or acres) ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed - Coo 7 .62=0/&4t7O 'v , ❑ Site/Plot Plan (provide any additional information here) (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ❑ Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/:"x 11") i /� ❑ Applicant's Statement '6e O A (#of copies based on pre-app check list) `1_ ❑ 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped /.2_/97, /4,L Legal Size Envelopes ❑ Filing Fee $780.00 ro02.5/ /69_,„..- r 1 12-05-00 00:28 ID= MAY-26-00 FRI 09:51 UR VISIONS FAX NO. blJ 1 Ili -. P.01 04;28,'UO 'FRI. t3:10 'FAA 50 59R 1950 CITY nF TIGARD WOW) • • f Ltot any VARIANCE OR OTHER LAND use ACTIONS to be considered as pent of this eppltcatlon. • • 1 • • • I APPLICANTS: I. To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQ),11RED SUBM TI (At_ ELEMEITA as 1 deocribed on the front of this appNcation in the"Required Submittal Elements"box, `. - . .asszr��s.u,a �•r--ars.�o..v r..� are��s—s r �5.......-..-.--.--��e in (Detailed Submittal Pvqu cement Information shoats can be obtained,upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.); I THE APPLICANTS)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: . . 1 f . • Thra tPw rONISi ILdoea PALvie/ate any land rootrletiene thet...atay boa to nc?tntn��ed pottlitta 8u1Jleet tmBt • . If the AnptirviVon is granted,the applicant wit!exercise'the rights granted in accordance with the terms and sUbiect to ail tho.s conditions and limitations of the approval. . . All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments,And exhibits Wei nemfted herewith,ere-true: and the anplicarrts so acknowiedge that any permit issued,based on this application,may be revoked if it Is found Olt • any such t:tzatomenis are false. , . •• The applicant has read the entire contents ai the application, Including the polidos end ioriteria, end understendit that requirements for approving or denying the application. . I , ' SIGNATURES of ernsh owner of the subject property. ' • • . DATED this / day of ..._,,., s' T p.m. sut�t,�.�o r— no ` Signature- �_ _ • Owner's Signature • sej....,j ' C r _..„. —1:11$06(1.— .10'kEll!kiL—L ' er'a Signature Owner's Signature • 2 i • j • • • • . . 1 • . 1 Customer Receipt CITY OF TIGARD Printed:05/26/2000 12:13 User: front Station: 02 Operator: GEO Rcpt No: 0002483 Date: 05/26/2000 Customer No:000000 Amount Due: 780.00 Name: TROY M SCHMIDT Cash: 0.00 Address: 10190 SW INEZ ST Check: 780.00 TIGARD, OR 97224 N/A 0.00 Change: 0.00 Type Description Amount LANDUS Land Use Applications 780.00 re4-- /0190 w /.vimz. • • • 0 • -4A,,„„„„,,,,, CITY OF 11GARD June 9, 2000 OREGON Troy Schmidt 1019.0 SW Inez Street Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Notice of Incomplete Application Submittal Dear Mr. Schmidt: The City received your request for Minor Land Partition (MLP) approval for the above-referenced project on SW Inez Street. Based on a preliminary review of your application materials, Staff has determined that your submittal is incomplete for the purposes of continuing with Land Partition review. The following information is required before Staff can consider your application complete and begin the review: 1. Notification list of property owners within 500 feet of the subject property must be produced by the City of Tigard. I have enclosed a request form for your convenience. I am available to answer questions and otherwise assist you as may be required at 639-4171, extension 317. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. If I am not available, please leave your name and phone number so that I can call you as soon as possible. Sincerely, - zi: -idegger l , Assistant Planner I\curpin\mathew\mlp\M LP2000-00005.acc.doc Enclosure c: MLP2000-00005 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 MAY-26-00 09:07 FROM-FIDEL 111110UST SERVICE • T-570 P.04/05 F-731 pr.TD-ODh I to 2rear ir, 0 - '`�' Fidelity National Title Company of Oregon /.P STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED / I rl (Indrolduat or Corporate) traepp Im J. NILKIEHEYER AND MARJORIE N. WILRIEHEYER .. , glamor, earner, and wlrranls to...... ......... ......771,01;..M..saPlliiP.T.A P.EVERN .I...OPPliln'T....INVt,.Ftrs3..ar4 cite ....grower, the fallowing dercrlbed real property.free and clear of encumbrancer except ar:pet:Wally Jet fort?hrrreln, JJrttaled In the county of Wilsisi1lAtoe , Slate .Oregon. to wit: Sae atrached Legal Description e.treehed ae Exhibit "ONE" t S„h.Jecr co end cseapIIl g!1996--97 Taxes a lien not yor due rs payable; Daeerlbed property it aitt►in 14 eha poster of aas'egeosent of the Unified Sewer Agency. Righto of rho public a governmental agencies' in and to any portion of ee'd land lying within the boundaries' of OCrutta, roads'. 5' and htghuay$, 'S THIS INSTRUMENT W ILI.NOT ALLOW USE OF THIS PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OP APP1.tCAHI.E LAND IJSR LAWS ANP RF.I]UI.ATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TTfLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK%Vim VIE APPROPR/nT6 CITY Olt COUNTY NPI-ANNINA DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PR.ACCIcES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.93C THE TRUEI AND ACTUAL.-CONSIDERATION FOR THIS CONVEYANCE IS S ....J ll..aOp9.00 (Sec ORS 93.030) Dated Oils 7 day of..•...ppteraber , i9,95. Frederick J.•,- ikJiiemeyaZr Marjorie N. NtlkieAseyer STATE OF OREGON, Comity of __,j 1uica met1..• I I This instrument was acknowledged prime me on - bnw Pi , 199 6 by Fgederiek J. Nilklame er and Mar or is H. r cmayer . This instramem was acknowledged berate me on. , 199 bi- as --- - --^--- OI•FICIAr)gat Lt ` I i_L 1/C i4 , KAM J. I•Abn6rleg Nanny Public Us star or goo • t psnai ruG»IC•OrtE.1t)v My commission expire*: CW MI5StCjr I4o.all eel MT GOMMISSION EAMIflES JAN.30.t07s GRANTOR'S NAMR Spate reserves fat recorder's use GRANTEE'S NAME: • wagalNGTON rtniarT I.lmi1 funftar notice send future tax.ststemenis a: ARW ,wQ.Wr ritiniv, w Dr Sc tde N t 16 FM MP -. 10190 Slt Inez Strew - - TiBard, OR 97224 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: aataa above 14AY-25-00 09:Oi FROM-FIDELIOST SERVICE • T-570 P.03/05 F-i31 STATE OF OREGON County of WuNln tan ` 96 1,Jerry .40,4 y,of Meane- menl an t to CouMY Clark to •t f• _ ç7ø,.. sy • 12„,, v • ••011010, el �r di6Y exatfon.Li- : fork — Doc : 960A7663 Rect 1727151 162,00 09/30/1996 03130152pm i • w • �9AY-26-00 09:Oi FROM-FIDELI�ST SERVICE • T-570 P.05/05 F-731 EXHIBIT "ONE" Y # • That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon,'and - being more particularly described es follows: Se inning at a paint which lo 419.03 feet Went of the Northaeat Corner of Lot 200 Tlga,dvllie Heights, a plat of record in Section 11, Township 2 South, 'lenge 4 West, Willamette Merldipn, in the City of Tiqurd, Washington County, Oregon; and running thence South 1° 48' Weet parallel to the East line of Late 20 and 21,a distance of 208 feet to a point 10 feet South of the North line adjoining Lot 21;thence North 89931'West along a One parallel to the North line of Lot 21,a distance of 120 feet; thence North 1°48'East a distance of 20B feet to the North ling of said Lot 20; thence South 89°East c ong the North line of said Lot 20, a distance of 120 feet to the point of beginning. 2 t;; FT HiOFbs4L/PJ4RRAT1 vE • S • :tJfl3AiV VISIOIIIS 10190 S.W. INEZ STREET PARTITION Applicant Troy Schmidt • • 10190 SW Inez Street Tigard, OR 97223 Representative Urban Visions 2123 SE 12th Avenue Portland, OR 97214 Contact: Corbin Shays = Location 10190 SW Inez Street . Legal Description Tax Lot 2200 2S 1 E 11 BC Site Size 22,548 square feet Zone R 3.5 Proposal Partition one existing lot into 2 parcels for detached single family residences. Existing dwelling is to remain. Fees Partition Application $780 Pre App Date February 10, 2000 2123 SE 12th Avenue #2 - Portland, OR 97214 • Phone 503 797 9567 - Fax 503 797 9568 • Email urbanv©earthlink.net Land Development Consulting S • CONTENTS Application Form (2 copies) Application Fee ($780) Narrative (12copies) Proposal Site Description & Vicinity Infrastructure Improvements - Applicable-Code Regulation Impact Study Land Partitions Residential Zoning Districts Access, Egress & Circulation Density Computations Exceptions to Development Standards Landscaping & Screening Street Trees Off Street Parking Tree Plan Requirements Visual Clearance Requirements Conclusions Planning Map (12 sets) Site Plan Utility Plan Existing Conditions Vicinity Map 8 1/2 X 11 Reduced Planning Map (2 sets) Pre-Application Conference Notes (February 10th, 2000) Mail Labels (envelopes, postage, notification area map) Vesting Deed 2 • • PARTITION NARRATIVE Proposal: The applicant proposes to create a 2 lot partition. An existing single family residence exists on proposed parcel 1. The proposed new lot will be configured as a flag lot. At 10,001 square feet and 12,547 square feet, both lots conform lot size standards. Overall density is met. Both parcels exceed the 65 foot average lot width standard. All setbacks are met for parcel 1 and can be met for parcel 2. No tree removal permit is needed with this development. No adjustments or variances are necessary. Description of Site and Vicinity: The site is rectangular in shape at 120.00-feet wide and 187.99 feet in depth. The topography is sloped gently downward from the street at 5.3% (10 ft. of fall in a distance of 187 ft.). All surrounding uses are single family residences. It appears that adjoining sites east, west and southwest have potential for similar infill development. The site is located % mile west of Hall Blvd. Access to Hwy 217 is approximately 1/2 mile to the northeast. Infrastructure Improvements: Streets: SW Inez Street consists of approximately 21 feet of pavement width. No curbs or sidewalks exist along this block of Inez. No half street improvements are proposed with this partition. The applicant volunteers to enter into an agreement (restrictive covenant) to require the property owners of both parcels to economically participate in any future half street improvements. Stormwater: There is no public storm system on SW Inez between SW 100th and SW 103`d. The nearest existing storm line is located in SW 103rd. The grade slopes uphill from the subject site to the storm line. The adjacent subdivision / private drive to the south utilizes a drywell system. The applicant proposes to provide infiltration calculation for a drywell or soakage trench system to acceptable City of Tigard Engineering standards or provide plans for a private pump system that would run (in as easement) across the adjacent property to the west and to the existing storm line in SW 113`h. The applicant has also expressed interest in a catchbasin — irrigation system, thus would like to have an opportunity for the review of such a system. Sanitary: There is an existing sanitary sewer line in SW Inez to serve the new parcel. Water: There is an existing water main in SW Inez to serve the new parcel. 3 • . • Applicable Code Regulations: 18.390.040.E - Impact Study E. Include an impact study. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. •• - • -The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system,including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system,the sewer system,and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact,the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirements, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Existing and proposed improvements to street and infrastructure systems are :_addressed above under the "infrastructure improvements"section. .The addition of one single family residence to the subject neighborhood will have no negative impact. All utilities are available or can be made available to serve the proposed development. Generation of noise is not a concern for single family dwelling uses. Mature trees will be preserved to buffer the new co_nstruction from surrounding properties. This partition • promotes infill that conforms with the intent of the City of Tigard development standards. Home ownership is promoted and existing housing stock is preserved. Chapter 18.420 - LAND PARTITIONS 18.420.010 Purpose A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to provide rules,regulations and standards goveming approval of partitions. 18.420.020 Administration A. Applicant. The applicant of a partition proposal shall be the recorded owner of the property or an agent authorized in writing by the owner. B. Conformance with state statute. Any application for a land partition shall be in conformity with all state regulations set forth in ORS Chapter 92,Subdivision and Partitions. C. Prohibition on sale of lots. No lot or parcel to be created through the partitioning process shall be sold until approval and filing of the final partition plat. D. Future re-division. When partitioning tracts into large parcels, the Director shall require that the parcels be of such size • and shape to facilitate future re-partitioning of such parcels in accordance with the requirements of the zoning district and this title. • The applicant will follow the City of Tigard Development Code as outlined above . 18.420.030 Approval Process A. Decision-making process. The Director shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application partition, which shall be reviewed by means of a Type II procedure, as governed by Chapter 18.390, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.420.050. B. Time limit on approval. The partition approval by the Director shall be effective for a period of 1-1/2 years from the date of approval. C. Lapsing of approval. The partition or approval by the Director shall lapse if. 4 • 1. The partition has not been recorded or has been improperly recorded with Washington County without the satisfactory completion of all conditions attached to the approval; 2. The final recording is a departure from the approved plan. D. Extension. The Director shall,upon written request by the applicant and payment of the required fee,grant an extension of the approval period not to exceed one year provided that: 1. No changes are made on the original plan as approved by the Director, 2. The applicant can show intent of recording the approved partition or lot line adjustment within the one-year . • extension period;and 3. There have been no changes in the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions on which the approval was based. The applicant will adhere to the above noted approval process. 18.420.040 Application Submission Requirements A. -General submission requirements. All applications shall be made on forms provided,by the.Director and shall include information required for a Type 11 application,as govemed by Chapter 18.390. B. Specific submission requirements.All applications shall include the preliminary lot line map and necessary information in graphic and/or written form. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about these submission requirements: This application has been submitted in conformance with the above noted requirements. 18.420.050 Approval Criteria A. Approval criteria. A request to partition land shall meet all of the following criteria: 1. The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; 2. There are adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal; 3. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards;and 4. All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below: a. The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. b. The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation. Parcel 2 has a lot area of 10,546 after the access way has been deducted. c. Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15-foot wide access easement. Parcel 2 has a 20 foot wide access way with frontage along SW Inez. d. Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. All setback standards of the base zone can be achieved with the proposed partition. e. When the partitioned lot is a flag lot,the developer may determine the location of the front yard,provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. 5 • • The flag lot will have the front of the dwelling oriented west. There will be a minimum of 10 foot sebacks on both side yards. f. A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. The existing fir trees along the west boundary of the access drive serve as a buffer. No additional buffer is proposed. g. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities. A fire hydrant is located on the south side of SW Inez at the northeast corner of the property. The access way to parcel 2 is 100 feet in length. No additional fire hydrant is proposed. h. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. No common drive is proposed. 5. Any accessway shall comply with-the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705,Access,Egress,and Circulation. The proposed drive will conform to the applicable standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress, and Circulation. 6. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. 7. An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in accordance with Chapter 18.370, Variances and Adjustments. The applications for the partition and variances)/adjustment(s) will be processed concurrently. 18.420.060 Final Plat Submission Requirements A. Submittal, All final plats for partitions shall be accompanied by three copies of the partition plat prepared by a land surveyor or engineer licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. The final plat shall incorporate any conditions of approval imposed by the Director as part of the preliminary plat approval. B. Standards. The partition plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05) and by Washington County, as described in detail by.information provided by the Director at the time of application. Final Plat submittal will adhere to the requirements noted above. 18.420.070 City Acceptance of Dedicated Land A. Acceptance of dedications by City Engineer. The City Engineer shall accept the proposed right-of-way dedication prior to recording a land partition. B. Acceptance of public easements by City Engineer. The City Engineer shall accept all public easements shown for dedication on partition plats. 18.420.080 Recording Partition Plats A. Recording requirements. Upon the Director's approval of the proposed lot line adjustment, the applicant shall record the final partition plat with Washington County and submit a copy of the recorded survey map to the City, to be incorporated into the record. 6 • • B. Time limit. The applicant shall submit the copy of the recorded lot line adjustment survey map to the City within 15 days • of recording,and shall be completed prior to the issuance of any building permits on the re-configured lots. The partition plat shall be recorded as noted above. Chapter 18.510 - RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS C. R-3.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. One additional detached single-family dwelling unit is proposed. Both parcels exceed the minimum 10,000 square foot lot size. 18.510.040 Minimum and Maximum Densities A; Purpose. The purpose of this section is to establish minimum and maximum densities in each residential zoning district. To ensure the quality and density of development envisioned, the maximum density establishes the ceiling for development in each zoning district based on minimum lot size. To ensure that property develops at or near the density envisioned for the zone,the minimum density for each zoning district has been established at 80%of maximum density. B. Calculating minimum and maximum densities. The calculation of minimum and maximums densities is governed by the formulas in Chapter 18.715,Density Computations. . C. Adjustments. .Applicants may request an adjustment when, because of the size of the site or other constraint, it is not •possible to accommodate the proportional minimum density as required by Section 18.715020C and still comply with all of the development standards in the underlying zoning district, as contained in Table 18.510.2 below. Such an adjustment may be granted by means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Chapter 18.390, using approval criteria in Section 18.370.020 BI. • A two parcel partition achieves both minimum and maximum density. The overall site is 22,548 square feet in area. maximum density: 22,548/10,000= 2.25 or 2 lots. minimum density: 2.25 x 80% = 1.8 or 2 lots. 18.510.050 Development Standards A. Compliance required. All development must comply with: 1. All of the applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district, except where the applicant has obtained variances or adjustments in accordance with Chapters 18.370; 2. All other applicable standards and requirements contained in this title. B. Development Standards. Development standards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2. 7 • • TABLE 18.510.2 - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES STANDARD R-3.5 Minimum Lot Size -Detached unit 10,000 sq.ft. -Duplexes -Attached unit(1J Average Minimum Lot Width -Detached unit lots 65 ft. -Duplex lots 90 ft. -Attached unit lots Maximum Lot Coverage - Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 20 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots 20 ft. -Side yard 5 ft. -Rear yard 15 ft. -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district -Distance between property line and front of garage 20 ft. Maximum Height 30 ft. Minimum Landscape Requirement - (11 Single-family attached residential units permitted at one dwelling per lot with no more that five attached units in one grouping. (2]Lot coverage includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. All development standards can be achieved wit the proposed partition. 8 • • Chapter 18.705 - ACCESS,EGRESS,AND CIRCULATION 18.705.010 Purpose A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish standards and regulations for safe and efficient vehicle access and egress on a site and for general circulation within the site. 18.705.020 Applicability of Provisions A. When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures,the remodeling of existing structures(see Section 18.360.050),and to a change of use which increases the 'on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. - C. When site design review is not required. Where the provisions of Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, do not apply, the Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an access plan submitted under the provisions of this chapter in conjunction with another permit or land use action. 18.705.030 General Provisions A. Continuing obligation of property owner. The'provisions and maintenance of access and egress stipulated in this title are continuing requirements for the use of any structure or parcel of real property in the City. B. Access plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access,egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. C. Joint access:Owners of two or more uses;structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses,structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title,provided: 1. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements,leases or contracts to establish the joint use;and 2. Copies of the deeds, easements,leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. D. Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. E. Curb cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N. No curbs or sidewalks exist in the subject property area. No street improvements are proposed with this partition. F. Required walkway location_On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: A walkway is not required for single family residential uses. H. Minimum access requirements for residential use. 1. Vehicular access and egress for single-family,duplex or attached single-family dwelling units on individual lots and multi-family residential uses shall not be less than 19 as provided in Table 18.705.1 and Table 18.705.2; TABLE 18.705.1 VEHICULAR ACCESS/EGRESS REQUIREMENTS: RESIDENTIAL USE(6 OR FEWER UNITS) Number Dwelling Unit/Lots Minimum Number of Minimum Access Width Minimum Pavement Width Driveways Required 1 or 2 1 15' 10' The access way is proposed at 20 feet in width. Pavement width will conform to the 10 foot width standard. 9 • • 3. Private residential access drives shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Fire Code; The driveway will be designed and constructed to meets applicable provisions of the Uniform Fire Code. Chapter 18.715 - DENSITY COMPUTATIONS 18.715.010 Purpose A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to implement the comprehensive plan by establishing the criteria for determining the number of dwelling units permitted. 18.715.020 Density Calculation B. Calculating maximum number of residential units. To calculate the maximum number of residential units per net acre, divide the number of square feet in the net acres by the minimum number of square feet required for each lot in the applicable zoning district. C. I Calculating minimum number of residential units: As required by Section 18.510.040,,the.minimum.number of residential units per net acre shall be calculated by multiplying the maximum number of units deterrnined.in•Subsection B above by 80%(0.8). As submitted, a two parcel partition achieves both minimum and maximum density. The overall site is 22,548 square feet in area. maximum density: 22,548/10,000= 2.25 or 2 lots. minimum density: 2.25 x 80% = 1.8 or 2 lots. • Chapter 18.730 - EXCEPTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to present exceptions to the height and setback standards which apply in various zoning districts as detailed in Chapters 18.510, 18.520 and 18.530. Flexible and/or more stringent setback standards are designed to allow for the maximum use of land and to allow for a varied building layout pattern while ensuring there will be-adequate open space,•light, air•and distance between buildings to protect public health and . safety. No exceptions to height or setbacks are are required in conjunction with this partition. The flag lot will conform to the minimum R-10 lot size standard without the flag pole • accessway. Chapter 18.745 - LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING A. 'Applicability. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction•of.new structures, remodeling of existing structures where the landscaping is nonconforming(Section'18.760.040C),"and to a-change of use which results in the need for increased on-site parking or loading'requirements'or-which changes the access requirements. • Landscape screening requirements are not applicable to this partition. No change of use is proposed and there are no on-site parking or loading requirements beyond standard single family residential use. Chapter 18.745.040 - Street Trees A. Protection of existing vegetation.All development projects fronting on a public street,private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040 C. B. Street tree planting list. Certain trees can severely damage utilities, streets and sidewalks or can cause personal injury. • Approval of any planting list shall be subject to review by the Director. 10 • • C. Size and spacing of street trees. • c. Large trees over 40 feet tall and more than 35 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 40 feet apart; There are 4 existing fir trees along parcel l's frontage. All trees are located approximately 6 feet within the property line. All trees are spaced within 40 feet of one another. There are 5 existing large fir trees and 2 smaller deciduous trees along the flagpole driveway. The greatest distance between trees is 40 feet. E. Cut and fill around existing trees. Existing trees may be used as street trees if no cutting or filling takes place within the drip-line of the free unless an adjustment is approved by the Director by means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030,using approval criteria in Section 18.370.020 C4a. The applicant proposes to use the existing trees to satisfy the street tree requirement. No cutting or filling is proposed on proposed parcel 1. Chapter 18.765 - OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS 18.765.010 Purpose A. Insure adequate vehicle parking. These parking requirements are intended to provide sufficient vehicle parking in close proximity to the various uses for residents, customers and employees, and to establish standards which will maintain the traffic carrying-capacity of nearby streets. B. Adequate capacity. These regulations are also intended is to establish vehicle parking areas which have adequate capacity and which are appropriately located and designed to minimize any hazardous conditions on the site and at access points. 18.765.020 Applicability of Provisions A. New construction. At the time of the erection of a new structure within any zoning district, off-street vehicle parking will be provided in accordance with Section 18.765.070. Parking requirements will be addressed within the building permit review process. Proposed parcel 2 has addequit space for parking and maneuvering areas. No • alterations are proposed to parking for the existing dwelling. 18.765.030 General Provisions B. Location of vehicle parking. The location of off-street parking will be as follows: 1. Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling(s); Parking spaces for proposed parcel 2 will be located on parcel 2. No alteration to the existing dwelling's parking is proposed. Table 18.765.2 Minimum and Maximum Required Off-street Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Requirements Per code standards, one space is required for each dwelling unit. Both parcels will exceed this number. 11 • • 18.790.030 Tree Plan Requirement A. Tree plan required. A tree plan for the planting,removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition,site development review,planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. At the site development phase, a tree protection plan will be submitted by a certified arborist. The new dwelling will not require the removal of any trees. • • However, one-topped and diseased conifer is expected to require removal due to its health and location within the flagpole portion of parcel 2 18.795.030 Visual Clearance Requirements B. Obstructions prohibited. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle,hedge,planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area,provided all branches below eight feet are removed. C. Additional topographical constraints. Where the crest of a hill or vertical curve conditions contribute.to the obstruction of clear vision areas at a street or driveway intersection, hedges,plantings,fences, walls, wall structures and temporary or permanent obstructions shall be further reduced in height or eliminated to comply with the intent of the required clear vision area. There are currently no-obstructions caused by fences, shrubs, tree branches or topographic concerns. 18.795.040 Computations A. Arterial streets. On all designated arterial streets the visual clearance area shall not be less than 35 feet on each side of the intersection. B. Non-arterial streets. - 1. Non-arterial streets 24 feet or more in width.At all intersections of two non-arterial streets, a non-arterial street and a driveway, and a non-arterial street or driveway and railroad where at least one of the streets or driveways is 24 feet or more in width, a visual clearance area shall be a triangle formed by the right-of-way or property lines along such lots and a straight line joining the right-of-way or property line at points which are 30 feet distance from the intersection of the right-of-way line and measured along such lines. See Figure 18.795.1: SW Inez is approximately 21 feet in width. Non-arterial street computations are not applicable. • yfP t�rtJ�.� . i1Tk'� • • • er 2v,Lor,i .ilvzor.„.. • • *0, • . • • Lihti • g0 309(2}0F • 12 • • C ONCLUSIONS • The proposal is for a 2 lot partition. Both parcel can conform to the development standards of the R-3.5 zone. No Adjustments or Variances are required. All utilities are available or can be made available to serve the proposed development. This partition promotes infill that conforms with the intent of the development standards. Home ownership is promoted and existing housing stock is preserved. With appropriate conditions of approval this proposal will meet all applicable criteria for a minor partition. • 13 ' 0 ,. . 1 • _ APPLICANT: TROY SCHMIDT 10190 S.W. INEZ STREET, TIGARD OR 97224 519-5420 'GRAVEL ASPHALT i \ 10• CONCRETE REPRESENTATIVE: URBAN VISIONS DRIVEWAY I DRIVEWAY J CULVERT . 2123 S.E. 12TH AVENUE UN EOP 7 EOp S.W. INEZ STREET SUITE 2 EL 101.54 ��SANIT 1Y_ MANHOLE PTLD, OR 97214 _ —C` S EL 99.40 EOP 797-9567 CORBIN O EL 101.41 ��-, I WATER EOP WAT N 8• cin�� : '`-' A"'u,1'': ----f -VAL 4 --mac a. 99.30 C.-CONCRETE.------- LOCATION: 10190 S.W. INEZ STREET {'— ;. ,,, y x a 120.00' . WAT '! ' CULVERT STATE ID: R0502325 FD 3/4•IP B 1 ....'°o-:`=,r ?� 1;s:4` 1 I . I 1 1 /,• EL 101.12 �; 110 -;t;.-S=,. t,y ,;,:fit' --;;105.0 ' vim <►- R-3.5 (10,000 S.F. LOTS) ...:: :-'•y,y'•-'.'`_•_. 3 5"- 5.0' WIDE ZONE: ,4f ,., - . - - — PROPOSAL�`�Y,~ ;.�� FIGHT OF WAY 2 LOT PARTITION WITH NO VARIANCES. EXISTING ..,:::. vi"*.'.":.•7.4i. zg 1 DWEWNG WILL REMAIN. �' I = 4......,.:.. '• _ "�I` \ / ( \ AREA 600 S.F. TREE /.. �` :,.........;:.,...n..:.:...... ;.. .•!•.:;A .:.`•:.�z 1 \ / 1 , 4 I S _ SANITARY: PARCEL 1 CONNECTED TO PUBLIC SANITARY T... ,. + .' t;... "� :�;:'`. .',.i ��'� ' ■— — — PARCEL 2 TO BE CONNECTED TO PUBLIC SANITARY � � ::..r.::',- <.`_ ;��::• r- 1 WATER: PARCEL 1 CONNECTED TO PUBLIC WATER '• `"' ,'1 I PARCEL 2 TO BE CONNECTED TO PUBLIC WATER .-.9.9 .>!.▪ ,''.;.3�' • .. Q1 •'''"" '•'''.' , HOUSE co STORM: PARCEL 1 DRAINS TO FLASH BLOCK SYSTEM Y;: rr:�':ti' N PARCEL 2 TO DRAIN TO SOAKAGE TRENCH OR \\o-I , WILL BE PUMPED TO PUBLIC STORM LINE 4.3'4 I �-+ IN S.W. 113TH y_ Via-- -t -- T SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN '� _ I I\ i /" ` DECK I LANDSCAPE PLAN: DENSITY �v, _ -� - NO TREES TO BE REMOVED CALCS: OVERALL SITE AREA: 22,548 S.F. • I �' ' �`! `— —� 12.1' — EXISTING TREES TO BE PROTECTED WITH DEDICATION AREA: 600 S.F. • / � 'h- n T PARCEL .1 i - CONSTRUCTION FENCING AT DRIPLINE PARCEL 1 AREA: 10,009 S.F. I \ c 1 j l PARCEL 2 AREA: 11,940 S.F. / I v — AREA= 10,009 S.F. i- - THERE IS NO PROPOSED PLANTING WITH PARCEL 2 AREA 9 THIS PARTITION 4;;,;,_-ssw, • .�,,, r:.- �ti. ... - NO IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS REQUIRED LESS ACCESS POLE AREA): 10,507 S.F. trF%tiauv; + ` ' >�'""� 7 - THERE WILL BE NO GRADING OR STOCKPILING x,`�'.uc= 1. C S 89'51'00• E �+ � "'ti g.; s.� �;4`Y "' 105.00' I / OF TOPSOIL SOME INFORMATION SHOWN IIEREON V1EYb1!(*C9I r•v;' ..HIUVIIW•ST` ., .;H - NO SOIL TREATMENT IS REQUIRED SUPPLIED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER '°`�� {�'`'``t° SW' `.�6"''° I PUBLIC IMPROVMENTS/STREET PLAN: � .•0400®� lg9700 a NO CONTOURS; APPROXIMATE 5% GRADE - . r-/A 0„W Imo:;. .. F 00 PARCEL 2 j - NO HALF STREET IMPROVMENTS ARE PROPOSED ;.*:,.;,,,....y:', '%r�`y�,0'! q eat . inane : ^' jg AREA= 11,940 S.F. l 3- ;a "�=` •__-• �< ►°1- \ / GRADING EROSION CONTROL PLAN: ``,;i, ,•;,i.- ',, ..y'• T3 a k 'awort,,,..,,, a:' y g4 AREA= 10,507 S.F. WITHOUT FLAG POLE — '" ; • M!, F gip, i r�,. ,,;;t„ z,:�:. ry.-_,. i g - GRADING WILL BE LIMITED TO SOIL RE-DISTRIBUTION •' - , :v.'£ :. q`- "sw;fiiEz=a . P I M TO ACHIEVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM FOUNDATION. S � 'Lam= ;. ;,� K . I _ THERE WILL BE NO GRADING ON THE SITE GREATER THAN 4 INCHES. ��"'`��I 1 ; I 1 _/ 7 — EROSION CONTROL FENCING WILL SURROUND CONSTRUCTION AREA. < N > , I ;.sM Yr, MIRDOCK 'u::5T;'Y's�n` I ,.. 99W ,3'x'°° ,a 4 �.. '''*'.A.,..1, 1,,,� i:'si,; - 1 v\w N GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WILL BE UTILIZED. �'.",�'U' r • AOt v ;sssi= •s,-,• .'.i; : \ 1_r �•` /�I \.� fa -t TREE PRESERVATION PLAN: '� ` Gov.' �'•ii \,.,�/ _ /' ■ /:1;-r. ._.t_-. ., xf'uaA.sw a - — EXISTING TREES TO BE PROTECTED WITH CONSTRUCTION Y r, :' ,�, 'S41`t`'}I00 I n ' `.,'v511.i::t co .��y s-r� : QS* a A .° .;f-,” moo= }: I 1 \ Y // FENCING AT DRIPLINE. ,-,..„ Q '%11,--!. ts..,yLE.:. i=a I.ST, "`•.� ?' / • / VICINITY MAP - I` / �/ �~ / 3 / NOT TO SCALE _ _ — 1 — _J_,` TENTATIVE PLAN TAX LOT 2200, 2S 1W 11 BC FD 3/4•IP / ,\� . 'S �0" W_! �1 •/ ' . 3/�•IP N.W. 4 SEC. 11, T.2S., R.1 W., W.M. — SAN— —EL 90.90 — /7-1-\ i 1 \ V�_ ��- 1 — \—/—— ---• SAN— SANI[Arty MANMULL FD 3/4'IP I / PER AS-BUILTS EL 91.40 CITY OF TIGARD I . WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON 111 �� JANUARY 26, 2000 Centerline Concepts Inc. ,G DRAWN BY: MPW CHECKED BY: WGDIII QQ' SCALE 1"=30' ACCOUNT #150-3726 640 82nd Drive Gladstone, Oregon 97027 • M:\BND\SCHMIDT3726\SCHMIDTSC _ 503 650-0188 fax 503 650-0189 APPLICANT: TROY SCHMIDT 10190 S.W. INEZ STREET,. TIGARD OR 97224 519-5420 RAVEL ASPHALT I \ 10"CONCRETE -0 DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY CULVERT a REPRESENTATIVE URBAN VISIONS 2123 S.E. 12TH AVENUE Epp S.W. INEZ STREET SUITE 2 N COP -1.,b, 'T.. . PILO, OR 97214 El 101.54 )_@SANITARIY MANHOLE El 99.0 EOP I .."' CONTACT: CORBIN 797-9567 EL.101.41 I WATER EOP WAT • EL 99.30 EN 06134 *" LOCATION: 10190 S.W. INEZ STREET ''''. VAL.7 WAY • TREE ,'3It. 1 ZO.00. IIIMI:cumorr STATE ID: R0502325 FO 3/4-IP ilIMIIIIMINSWERIMUIll IIIIIIIIMIIIIVIIRI w EL 101.12 PO' `•..1.,..,:;--:-.7".:,-.1'rc'i 105.0r. x 5.0 WIDE wkt tw, TA ZONE: R-15 (1C/.000 S.F. LOTS) ,,..:',,,,,,•.:.,......,..7.-4-..t.:, _ - 3- _ c. .',-•,-v-,',..,,,..'.4,,._4.-.:•-•-. • _ .- cTh141.. c,f,„,,. 1,.- _ a, -::9 • - RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSAL: 2 LOT PARTITION WITH NO VARIANCES. EXISTING 1114; W ,-0;i,..;:::.;;,,o,•, 50- , ',7,...,- \...-- DEDICATION DWELLING WILL REMAIN. r ..,.'0., 1-...s.../.',1-\:,-,-<, : \a. - ', A\/ I\ AREA 600 S.F. TREE .4.or 1 .,";:•,...:,,..,•::I, ...,:,,,..•,..,..- 1 PARCEL I CONNECTED TO PUBLIC SANITARY i'1133 ;-:-: .'... i:;'.:-..:,;f;.::::'''? ———7.-.:----;I ;‘,9, SANITARY: PARCEL 2 TO BE CONNECTED TO PUBLIC SANITARY ._,, -- - \ :: /06", . ....".7. 1—— I :f,,, WATER: PARCEL 1 CONNECTED TO PUBLIC WATER PARCEL 2 TO BE CONNECTED TO PUBLIC WATER .9.9.:J,.•:: : ,, It I -0 41, I e0i , : ',^':■:',:i. I ..,,,. _ NotiSE I c9 . co .- STORM: PARCEL 1 DRAINS TO FLASH BLOCK SYSTEM PARCEL 2 TO DRAIN TO SOAKAGE TRENCH OR WALL BE PUMPED TO PUBLIC STORM LINE -\\.- - V".4 -11 IN S.W. 113TH SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN 1 1-:,- .,...,:.‘ ' ,, DENSITY lw ,■0 I "\ 1 DECK ' LANDSCAPE PLAN: - NO TREES TO BE REMOVED CALCS: OVERALL SITE AREA: 22,548 S.F. .12. • ,,..,,, i , I 1 -04 ‘-.--.- 12.1. i . - EXISTING TREES TO BE PROTECTED WITH DEDICATION AREA: 600 S.F. .,../..,JD-I-- -I us 7 PARCEL 1 AREA: 10,009 S.F. Oa"I ---- ..oveec 1 n'o. ._ PARCEL 1 I 1„ CONSTRUCTION FENCING AT DRIPLINE PARCEL 2 AREA 11,940 S.F. / -- • lo. , IV AREA-10,009 S.F. i— \ - THERE IS NO PROPOSED PLANTING W1TH PARCEL 2 AREA / I .... 6: •• ' THIS PARTITION LESS ACCESS POLE AREA): 10,507 S.F. - NO IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS REQUIRED /, ,., / • /3.OCI / ••. S 89.51.00.E 10500 I / - THERE WILL BE NO GRADING OR STOCKPIUNG OF TOPSOIL SOME INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON 0 s, - - NO SOIL TREATMENT IS REQUIRED PUBUC IMPROVMENTS/STREET PLAN: SUPPUED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER NO CONTOURS; APPROXIMATE 5R GRADE .r.-..if;:ilvd,NLII'•. ,A7.4..wmigg 4 ..4 LL, / c..09515' .q le.70,,l,Y2.4 ,.;••."-..-4,47,?,,7irsrAi wtro co PARCEL. 2 / 84 - 7 — NO HALF STREET IMPROVMENTS ARE PROPOSED 3- ilh...V diiiri:.*.V.:Ar'1%-,,:-., ii7i.: Yr ,,,,tim CLUS11B_........-.."--AREA.11,940 S.F. 'V / GRADING/EROSION CONTROL PLAN: ..3".4...,:a7, ,..... ..„,,,,,ot_g ilL,,,;,,„-;.„, I IT aikf.---AREA..10,507 S.F.WITHOUT FLAG POLE —4k\ 106- TO SAOIWALYREFROM-0 TO GRADING WILL BE U DMRITEAINDA .,- I\ .:.0 ISTRFOITYNTIDOANTION. urtRct do' ''IL n ,r!144,7e.1*,'""t*L't',,,,'4,3!;-.XIME 5: 7' I C THERE WILL BE NO GRADING ON THE SITE GREATER THAN 4 INCHES. I r ' -r) ,4- ).=P';--4,1FrY:9'rM= ''O' Z I i' < N> - ,,rotti: :or - .., , iff,.I ...5fe 7 , - EROSION CONTROL FENCING WILL SURROUND CONSTRUCTION AREA. I ..N.4,73 0- - GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WILL BE UTIUZED. 1 .,,,,Y.T-.',TAti•,„1,,.,:::.`tinnba,4C,V..2E1.'4,!,,,,ET IA.cot, ix, 12A 4 A/ 'tN7'':-/10 ci/ /Vii,',Will§s4144:i14,..4,- .OM.1:1:119r,. — , \-- TREE PRESERVATION PLAN: vsi....s, w Li.!'::.I',,,■Igif.41N....f-,,irl .C"..4%.....‘'..-4' - ...I- \ - 6 r■ co - EXISTING TREES TO BE PROTECTED WITH CONSTRUCTION ftklia3:21- 17i7a71-111ilark; II - _ . . /.....- FENCING AT DRIPLINE. I.r*VV,'.-■[ ,'''Ii41a.t.11A",:ith)'... ':ii 2 '"oca 4 %i", -,--,----1g, 4.,,,,„,e,./,( § yg4 pit , VICINITY MAP ..-- , :9 W0.,k, .2 &g 12_ TENTATIVE PLAN TAX LOT 2200, 2S 1W 116C 1111,4 NOT TO SCALE _ -ie cot• wr,t- / • 7/ - -.-• _c•i_4_• -Co;Oil - — — —SAN— —ERL i 39/04.910 P—/ A e .. SAN— — —N W.4 7SR—E"iC. 1g1, '-T.-2S., —RAW., W .M. FD 3/4.1P <1) EL.91.40 CITY OF 11GARD III 43 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON JANUARY 26, 2000 ' Centerline Concepts Inc. DRAWN BY: MPW CHECKED BY: WGDIII r (iC's SCALE 1"--.30' ACCOUNT #150-3726 640 82nd Drive Gladstone, Oregon 97027 M:\EIND\SCHMIDT3726\SCHMIDTSC * 503 650-0188 fax 503 650-0189 S coN 37r19'dNV (V OLL n cid "38 , _ . 0 • ; r I OIAR - � i - x ; T RE APL ATOCONEREE : , `, � ;; ? w ,f - PICINFNC -',NOE S _ or. tgq, f +_ J r ,, _ 6„: v% , r„ <T .,,.-„. , � ��(Oti�lun, ,„:„„i-,,,,Lnt :,-7:-.,,,,,,„,..,,, = , ' r , + ...:3.-„^ _ s t ,s' - A- " ,, O r s--1. a •€44— - -,}2' f: IAL SETBA Streets: feet from the centerline of Flag lot: A ten (10)-foot side yard setback applies to all primary structures. ➢ Zero lot line lots: A minimum of a ten (10)-foot separation shall be maintained between each dwelling unit or garage. ➢ Multi-family residential building separation standards apply within multiple-family residential developments. (Refer to Code Section 18.1301 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES UP TO 528 SQUARE FEET in size may be permitted on lots less than 2.5 acres in size. Five (5)-foot minimum setback from side and rear lot lines. ACCESSORY STRUCTURE UP TO 1,000 SQUARE FEET on parcels of at least 2.5 acres in size. (See applicable zoning district for the primary structures'setback requirements] SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVA I PRIO: TO SUBMI '" NG A S : .(VISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, applican _ _ - QUIRED to co . ete and file a - - - naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office i • der . ••tain approval/reserv- • for any subs'vision name. Applications will not be accepted as complete until the City receives the fa- :• confirm- ion of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. - (County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-88841 G LOT BUILDING NEIGN ROVIS NSA MAXI IGHT OF 11/2 STORIES or 25 feet, whichever is less in most zones; 2% stories, or 35 feet in R-7, R-12, R-25 or R-40 zones provided that the standards of Code Section 18.730.010.0. are satisfied. RES I I TION (See example bel - = • - e a _ a _ a D on a particular site may be calculated by dividing the net area of the developable land by the minimum number of square feet required per dwelling unit as . specified by the applicable zoning designation. Net development area is calculated by subtracting the following land area(s) from the gross site area: All sensitive lands areas including: ➢ Land within the 100 year floodplain; ➢ Slopes exceeding 25%; ➢ Drainageways; and ➢ Wetlands for the R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 zoning districts. Public right-of-way dedication: ➢ Single-family allocate 20% of gross acres for public facilities; or ➢ Multi-family allocate 15% of gross acres for public facilities; or ➢ If available, the actual public facility square footage can be used for deduction. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7151 I EXAMPLE OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATIONS: EXAMPLE: USING A ONE ACRE SITE IN THE R-12 ZONE(3,050 MINIMUM LOT SIZE)WITH NO DEDUCTION FOR SENSITIVE LANDS . Single-Family Multi-Family 43,560 sq. ft.of gross site area 43,560 sq. ft. of gross site area 8.712 sq. ft. (20%)for public right-of-way 6.534 sq.ft. (15%)for public right-of-way NET: 34,848 square feet NET: 37,026 square feet 3.050 (minimum lot area) . - 3.050(minimum lot area) 11A Units Per Acre = 12.1 Units Per Acre • *The Development Code requires that the net site area exist for the next whole dwelling unit.NO ROUNDING UP IS PERMITTED. *Minimum Protect Density Is 80%of the maximum allowed density.TO DETERMINE THIS STANDARD,MULTIPLY THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS BY.8. aTY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 10 Residential Appliatioa/Planning Division kction • . LOC The perimeter of BLOCKS FORMED BY STREETS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1,800 FEET measured along the right-of-way line except where street location is preduded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development. When block lengths greater than 600 feet are permitted, pedestrian/bikeways shall be provided through the block. (Refer to Code Section 18.810.0901 FU == I0N0 !all: ➢ Be filed by the applicant in conjunction with an application for a subdivision or partition. The plan shall show the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division and shall include boundaries of the proposed land division and shall include other parcels within 200 feet surrounding and adjacent to the proposed land division. ➢ Identify existing or proposed bus routes, pullouts or other transit facilities, bicycle routes and pedestrian facilities on or within 500 feet of the site. Where necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed. - (Refer to Code Section 18.810.030.FJ KING AND AC S ARKING AREAS AND DRIVEWAYS MUST BE PAVED. ➢ Single-family Requires: One (1) off-street parking space per dwelling unit; and One (1) space per unit less than 500 square feet. ➢ Multiple-family Requires: .1.25 spaces per unit for 1 bedroom; 1.5 spaces per unit for 2 bedrooms; and 1.75 spaces per unit for 3 bedrooms. Multi-family dwelling units with more than ten (10) required spaces shall provide parking for the use of guests and shall consist of 15% of the total required parking. • NO MORE THAN 40% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet. 6 inches X 18 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet. 6 inches X 16 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Handicapped parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. Meier to Code Section 18.705 a 18.7651 BICYCLE RACKS BIG-YCLE--RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMIL'Y�CO EI CIA[,. AND INDUSTRIAL /DEVELOPMENTS.. Bicycle racks shall be located-in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations:, • [Refer to Code Section'183651 QTY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 10 Residential Application/Planning Dimsion Section 0 • itsrarl-. -11117 . Minimum number of accesses: *,/ Minimum access width: /9-- . Maximum access width: • 10 Minimum pavement width: /0 - REQUIRED WALKWA Within all ATTACHED HOUSING (excep o-family dwellings) and • . i-family de, : opments, each residential dwelling SHALL BE CONNECT s BY WALKWAY O THE VEHICULA'�2ARKING AREA, COMMON OPEN SPACE AND RECREA •N FACIL ES. fer to Code Section 18.7051 EAR VISION AR i ; The C' requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT AT ROAD/DRIVEWAY, ROAD/RAILROAD, AND ROAD/ROAD INTERSECTIONS. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7951 BUFFERING AND SCREENING . In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse not visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the CI QUIRES LANDSCAPED BUFFER AREAS ALONG CERTAIN SITE PERI ' TERS. Required buffe areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas st be occupied by a mixtur of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must.also ach' -ve a balance between vertical a horizontal plantings. ite obs • '•• screens or fences m. also be required; these are often advisable even if no. required by the -.e. The required •uffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, tilities, and walkways. ' • '•• - '• •rmation on required buffer area materials and sizes may be •ound in the Community Development Code. (Refer I •ode Chapter 18.1451 The REQUIRED BUFFER AND SCREENING STANDARDS that are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: • along the north boundary. along the east boundary. along the south boundary. along the west boundary. 1iEET TREES • ET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two(2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.705,18.745&18.7651 • CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 10 Residentiil Application/Planning Division Section • 'EE REMOVAL ' •. t REQUIREMEN . a . • A"l' e ' HE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. The TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D. according to the following standards: • Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.790.060.D. of no net loss of trees; • Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; • Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; • Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; > Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and > A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. (Refer to Code Section18.190.030.CJ REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: > A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. > If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably • available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: • The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property; and ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to •allow growth to maturity. IN-LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.790.060. CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 10 Residential Appliation/Planning Division Section • •• SIGNS • - N PER LA UST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION 0 •NY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines : Sign Permits" handout is available •: request. • •11. 'onal sign area or height beyond Code standa : may be permitte• e- sign proposal is reviewe• as part of a development review application. A er - lye y, a Sign Code Adjustment application ma se filed for Director's review. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1801 SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLO• I • _• , ► e URAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCES ! 25%, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminarily identify sensitiv- ands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, e responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas. and their boundaries. is the responsi.ility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated o plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, prote• ion, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WIT IN FLOODPLAINS. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.115) STEEP SLOPES When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final Drier, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the T'•ard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon fiel• exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommend. - : - _ - -_ - -- -• irements of Sections 18.775.080.C.2. and 18.775.080.C.3. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY(US BUFFER STANDARDS,RESOLUTION AND ORDINANCE(R&01 96-44 LAND DEVELOPMEN ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor fora suffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. • Design Criteria: THE VEGETATED CORRIDSR SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 25 FEET WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries •f the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the 'dth of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a •ortion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachm t.shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25% of the length of the vegetated corridor within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any . e, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictio : n the Vegetate Corridor: NO st .ctures,. development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, du •sing of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract .•m the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, EXCEPT AS ALLOWED AS FOLLOWS: CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 10 Residential Appfiatan/PI•nnin`Division Section S • > A GRAVEL WALKWAY OR BIKE PATH, NOT EXCEEDING EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than ten (10) feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and ➢ WATER QUALITY FACILITIES may encr.- - . • e vegetated corn.. - • aximum of ten (10) feet with the approval of the Agen •r City. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELJPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS OR LOTS intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not b a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. (Refer to R&0 96-44/USA Regul. "ons-Chapter 3,Design for SWMI WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT THE WATER RESOURCES (WR) O RLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to esolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and ri Marian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standard- to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors, maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; inimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve sce ic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: THE WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS E REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe ha ••r" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions requir- hat "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and prote -• •- - - '• -''er, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual fl. • more than 1,000 cfs. - Ma'or .treams: Strew s which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry • and h:ve an average annual flow less than 1,000 cubic feet per second (cfs). ➢ MAJOR STREAMS IN TIGARD INCLUDE FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE ORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS)AND BALL CREEK. Minor S earns: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . inor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of As�T Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: THIS AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR.STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 10 k:idential Appliation/Pgnnint Division Section • ➢ The standard Tualatin River riparian setback is 75 feet, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ The major streams riparian setback is 50 feet, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ Isolated wetlands and minor streams (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. (Refer to Code Section 18.791.030] Riparian Setback Reductions • The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS •0% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapt:r, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through treambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparia setback area. Eli•ibilit for Ri•arian Setb. in Dis :-• Areas. To be ELIGIBLE FOR A "IPARIAN SETB A • • REDUCTION, the ap;!.licant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor wa- substantially disturbe• : the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be eased on the Vegetation St • • equired •y Section 18.797.050.0 that demonstrates all of the f. lowing: ➢ Native plant spec es currently cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; ➢ The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian.corridor and healthy trees have not b,.en removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five (5) years; ➢ That vegetatio was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.797.050 regulating removal of na • e plant species; . ➢ That there • ill be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and • ➢ The,average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. (Refer to Code Section 18.797.100] RATIVE • The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings for all applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria.would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. Applicant should review code for applicable criteria. CODE CHAPTERS 18.330(Conditional Use) 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ' 18.765(off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) 18.340(Director's Interpretation) t )8.630(Washington Square Regional Center) 18.775(Sensitive lands Review) 18.350(Planned Development) 18.105(Acceus/Egress/Grculation) 18.180(Signs) • • 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) 18.185(Temporary Use Permits) . 18.310(Variances/Adjustments) __I18.115(Density Computations) J 18.190(Tree Removal) 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) 18.120(Design Compatibility Standards) 18.195(Visual Clearance Areas) 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) 18.125_(Environmental Performance Standards) 1 8.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) 18.130(Exceptions To Development Standards) 18.798(Wireless Communiation Facilities) 18.410(lot Line Adjustments) 18.740(Historic Overlay) Y/18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) 18.420(land Partitions) 18.742(Home Occupation Pensuts) 18.430(Subdivisions) v 18.145(landscaping&Screening Standards) 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) 18.155(Mined Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) 18.530(Industrial Ioning Districts) 18.760(Honconfonrong Situations) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 10 Residential Appliation/Planning Division Section • • Vf PTO s a part.of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to include impact study with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development. on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system,.including-bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) NEIGHS I 'HOOD MEETING Th. APPLICANT SHALL NOT ' A ' °OPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APP' 'RIATE CIT FACILIT • OR of their • ••osal. A minimum of two .s between the mailing • - - and the meet''g date is required. -ase review the Lan. se Notifica ', handout concerning si - •.sting . -d the meeting notice. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code tandards • meeting with a Plans Exa• iner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use applicati• . (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) • CDING PERM S FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). RECYCLING Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is • - -•. ' •• : '•ard is within 'n•e P isposa s ervlce - - . --• • Hin• • - •• act person and can be reache• t (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.155) ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: 4//Q: ' cress c✓%lvuz • WY OF TIGARD Pre-Appliation Conference Notes Page 9 of 10 kaidentul Appliation/Plannint Division Section • • PROCEDURE/ I/ Administrative Staff Review. • Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. • Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS • All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted b mail or dro• •ed off at the counter without Plannin• Division acce•tance ma be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2" x 11" reduced scale site plan of the proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or Administrative Decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application • and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A ten (10) business day, public appeal period foll?�rs-all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard /'e�-i o he c . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available fro the Planning Division upon request. This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE, (unless deemed unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: /%/4 f -Cdfd4 �9J CITY Of TIGARD PLANNING DIVISII,:. STWPERSON HOLDING PRE-APP.MEETING PHONE: (503)639-4111 FAX (503)684-1291 • E-MAIL (staff's first name) @d.tigard.or.us • TITLE 18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE]INTERNET ADDRESS: ci.tigard.or.us H:\patty\masters\Pre-App Notes Residential.doc (Engineering section:preapp.eng) Updated: 2-Nov-99 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 10 of 10 Residential Appliation/Phnnn g Division Section \� I. • • CITY OF TIGARD. LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST • Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies. what is required for submittal of a complete land use application: Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: Date: 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed #10 envelopes and a notarized mailing list of all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (#10), addressed with 1" x 4" labels (see attached envelope submittal requirements) Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): Y� m" icinity Map Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan [3' Existing Conditions Map 110- Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ ubdivision Preliminary Plat Map ll/,,Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan �' Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan 0/ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan ❑ Site Development Plan ❑ Architectural Drawings In-' Landscape Plan ❑ Sign Drawings p/Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends o the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES f COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 • 0 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis ❑ Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in .photo-ready 81 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). icinity Map Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Exi ' • onditions Map Parcel boundaries, •imensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10%slopes or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ Locations of resource areas.including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with >_6"caliper measured 4' from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 O • The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ • Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ • Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ • Scale, north arrow and date ❑ • Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10%grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location,type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ • Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands and marsh areas • The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the a•.lication materials ❑ iminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner o - ..'_- .: - ❑ The owner's authorized agent • ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries •❑ Contour lines(2' intervals for slopes 0-10% or 5'for slopes >10%) . • ❑ Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25'of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4' above ground level • ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 • Site Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties Cl • • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25'of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s) of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation • ❑ 'Landscape Plan • Loca • • -- o be removed ❑ Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ • • •lic Improvements/Streets • . = ••- • •• -o -way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips S ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 •► S Grading/Erosion Control Pla - • - - . - -n to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios ❑ tilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ - - • ••• -• Yv. - :istribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ Pre -minary Storm Drainage Plan The locatio . : : -. ••fect to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location, width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility. ❑ Free Preservation/Mitigation Pia• Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ • • • is\;cu rpl n Masters\revised\ch kl ist.d oc 26-Nov-98 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 'PR APPLICATIONCONFERENCENOTES�' . ENGINEERING:SECTION {Q. MAX city r . • _.. shapu�p�Oette;.Coim wuty 251 ►( r=c-- PUBLIC FACILITIES 4 ZZ°° GALA-) The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ( fir. to Z ' feet from centerline.•( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: ( � '(2- street improvements will be necessary along �,►•/ I ►�lC—� c-• , to include: EK 1(9 feet of pavement clitstivA c- c ►.te concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities 5 -foot concrete sidewalk str et trees street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. oti2 Y�-� 1J�c�T 'at.4t CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applicatlon Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department Section ( ) stre`nprovements will be necessary al. • to include: ❑ feet of pavement - - ❑ concrete-curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees El street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along _ • to include: ❑ feet of pavement El concrete curb El storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. • ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement • El concrete curb El storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk • ❑ street trees El street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: 'tiZ (1.) `( - (2.) Rvie T;; A.p?ct +T ).W:,1- u.a-e -r r)G' at-G v��w►yc, -� WW1 Rest f -c (kt C. 1 (/( Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines CITY OF TIGARD Pre-AppgcatIon Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 faglneerlag Department Section are on the opposite of the street from the site. If thee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to • $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW iNEZ . Prior to c A ptsm- , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. • Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this prope is a(n) qa. inch line which is located AOJAcEnsc_ Tr* ca-g1-1 P+ LAN . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the dev'eloper's responsibility to E-rSrrIc AA-)C) ( - ∎-• c,>1.4P — ' a p -r ,vt Irk s—r Water Supply: The C--1t4 I(UA/1f7 - Phone:(503) +of' f provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: ` t(c Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: ill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Palk 0E A s-624A OP_A .IA(k6 R - -r nom✓ tom. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75)which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes • Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section newly created impervious !aces. The resolution contains a p•ision that would allow an applicant- ' to pay a fee in-lieu of cons ructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ( ) Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ( t.,K Payment of the fee in-lieu. • • Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. • TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee. category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. Fay PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The.cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. CITYOFT16ARD Pre-AppIcatlonConference Notes Page 4016 Engineering Department Section In addition, the perlOee will be required to post a bon•r similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services. Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot " grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will. also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOSUBDIVISIONS S All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: z� \o Zoo • ENGINEERING DEP ENT STAFF Phone: (5031639-4111 Fax: (5031684^7291 h:\pattylmasters\preapp.eng (Master section:preappr.mst) 04-March-1999 • CITY OF HOARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section • - • 0 . • :.Ve..!,.•• . . •3,'.•::::-- - . . . ,;::*•:'::• - ,,..----. ' k-i..-:.;•:•.- ' • :••••••;!::...::.-. . . . kit.::::i....... I . . I larva. I ASPHALT 10- CONCRETE RI9EwA y DR1VEWA CULVERT (*SANITARY mANHOLE Ea_ 99.40 — EOF WATER E . t O1.41 El G9.40 6- .,•. ...'"*"..i.--"AV-.' - ..' • • ".Y' •;,- Tr CONCRETE ,7,... -?.04141.... E 120.00 1p. I CULVERT FT) 3/4-1P • ,,.. ''' A=.=••:;;;4-Aik:5.4-, " s. 0 ‘'. ' :s`x . EL 101.12 - •-• -- _ - - • . - Aa; -,2171:els!„,._•;,_ ....cizt.s... ..,. • Gs . - 6' ;?,:-./../ A •tg."4±40,. /..4;,..., \ - i., g\ i \ , . IREE .0'' U "v7i4"."'h. :.> Itlfest • . :....ei•?: ..,4.t..-,701'. : ...i..t.t.u...,,,...•.-••. ,f_ 4- ..--- ---:=-1-1 irg 1 lb .Clb I . .„. / '.*:?.t.:,:,1•:S:,'.4-. 1 '.'"t%: -.VI i - ..- 6;' - 1 1 - \ ... i e,-- I„,; t...- iss... \ , 7 Dv ;, 4 ..._.- < • ' . - 7 iv' r— • • PARCEL 1 _ i, _. -- s„... .-'AREA- 10001 Si. I J I 1 -.: . • / - ... : .--. $ 8951'00" E 100.00' ; ot -; 141 • .... . i a 1. PARCEL 2 -\ . ' ' • CO . /SHED ■ ; sr• - AREA- 12,547 S$. - . " I 4v, • 0 . „ -- : - 1\ F 2l — - 1 e */ --..--- •,,Ak tn e _.,•-•. i-..), /, m`. :1 :\ c --- • . + / i/ ''.7.1 • i ‘... • '11•`':. i!I I‘ 7 § 7 / • 1 i g g-• ;f1 • : ' -1.4,. T ' 1.I •• - " i ;1.3-. 7 70.1 • . — \•7. .1.4F . V ., ---- ' , ■ - • • • ..— ,- '•-.'t t,-......... = cs-.. ... ,- . s, s's.I , @ Ac • , -.) . N i , • -- __ , .- ' • • - 1 - 7 I - Air:.' 14.4.s*W " • — • ' FR 3/4.1P 6 g\if■ii■(39 51 ,,... V, i24. A a-\ -,, it 3/4.07 EL 90410 / . FD 3/411 S L 90.91 TRA( EL 91.401 g ' . .• . • . . . • • • • 1.1 il 'b fi .I . i (</\,/ 11 TEN TA • N.W. 1/4 SEC. i CITY i i I I.! WASHINGTOt is • £0/E0'd S6L69£9 01 68TO 0S9 £@S SIABONCO 3N1 12131N33 ad 22:TI ela.ia0 11.1 1 • Troy M.Schmidt • 10190 SW Inez St. Tigard,OR 97224 (503)624-0366 February 1,2000 City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 To Whom It May Concern: I submit this on behave of the Minor Land Partition at 10190 SW Inez St,Tax Lot#2S111BC2200.The total current square feet at this location is 22,560.The.52-acre of land will be parceled as per specification on enclosed attachment A-1.Each parcel meets or exceeds the minimum 10,000 sq ft required in the section 18.160: of the Tigard Municipal Code. Questions/Issues: • With the current proposed borders set,parcel 2 currently has a pole barn structure approx.25 ft X 30 ft in size. Will this building have to be removed prior to approval of parcel? y' ' • There are approx.eight large evergreen trees that will need to be removed for land development,is a permit required for removal of the trees? r41Pr Current owner Troy M. Schmidt will develop parcel 2 for residential use. Centerline Concepts,Inc.640 82nd Drive Gladstone, OR 97027 generated all plan maps provided. Local contact at Centerline, Wade G.Donovan III,P.L.S.2276,(503)650-0188,Fax(503)650-0189. I look forward to meeting with you,should there be any question prior to the meeting,I can be reached at (503)519-5420 or(503)624-0366. Resp tfully, c.� Troy . Schmidt a Pre-Apps (CD Meetings) •February 2000 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Thursday, February 10, 2000 8:00 8:30 9:00 Pre-app 9:30 10:00 Troy Schmidt-624-0366 MLP 10190 SW Inez 10:30 11:00 Pre-app 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 1:57PM Wednesday, February 02,2000