Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
MLP1999-00016
A1LPI9d19 . OoOI (a \,%JImDRAWN DEC-12-01 03 :25 PM MTNGRP-HBD 5032931024 P. 01 410 • Ar Cp PL.Ahitsilk)6 VT aw-17)/Q- • Jean Hassell Family Trust 920 S.W. Stephenson Ct Portland, OR 972.19 December 12, 2001 • Planning Department. • Director City Attorney 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 REII. Property at 9640 SW Frewing AKA 13510 SW Ash Review by LtJBA preparation. Dear Sir: It has been several months since the initial request for the records regarding this property from 1959 through 2001 . Th 's lack of cooperation causes to file a rebuttal against the ity of Tigard request to Dismiss the review. The Planning department has consistently refused to keep t e original agreement with Jack Bond upon his withdrawal of tile MLP 99, that the planning department would turn over all records cur jrently being used as data for/against the property. It Chas further flistrated efforts to obtain copies of the file by nstst--- int that Mr. Bond or Mr. Gibbons come to a supervised . revi w page-bypage in order to obtain- such records. It has been stated by several staff members that "there ar lots of complaints in referring to the above property." However,: when copies of these complaints or the basis of the staff commert is requested, only copies of pages of materials submitted by Nr. Bond are made . Specifically, full copies of the following issues known to Mr . Bond including any comments, staff notes, , investigations, inspe tions, etc. are HEREBY FORMALLY REQUESTEDII: • �f MLP 90-00011 Frank van schoten. All notes, reason for with rawal- Any directives, decisions, inquiries, regarding the rop r y or , use as apartments, or continued use as apartments . 5fpa .ia ov -5,60114,'-`°"St 94- Lauri Minschor or hansen. All notes, preconf rence issues, Any directives, Oecisiops, i quiries reg ruing use of the property as apartments. Kea1cv‘ 99-Lauri Aldridge ( David Aldridge &/Or Jack Bond as r presentative All notes for the three preconferences, letters regarding efic.i encies, changes, variances, adjustments, discussions, noti es, ,�� C�de Enforkement Filebpr. ior to March 2001 . Particularly in regard to use of property. If no action, a certified statement by � gard City Planning and Enforcement that no action was taken and :reasons. Sincerely, Jack ti Bond, Trustee - 1 • AikN C M LPg b I • SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION Or:DELIVERY • Complete items.1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Received by(Please Prin elm• B.'.� f I -ry item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. Jy • Print your name and address on the reverse C. Signature • so that we can return the card to you. / A X • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, •• ,' ' `i gent or on the,front if space permits: • / � �❑Addressee D. Is.7-livery dress different from item 1? ❑Yes 1. Article Addressed to: If ES,enter delivery address below: ❑No 4117%P. JACK. e o a0 S,t0, Ste-P1tE>VSoA 67, Pert./Ni oiR q7 oZ/ ' 3. ce Type Se Verged Mail ❑ Express Mail ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑C.O.D. 4. Restricted.Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes 2. Article Number(Copy from service label) .7 000 /6'7 a OOO q "6'- Od i PS Form 3811,July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-00-M-0952 • • 411 0 r:Aht CITY OF TIGARD December 27, 2001 OREGON Jean Hassell Family Trust Attn: Jack Bond 920 SW Stephenson Ct. Portland, OR 97219 Dear Mr. Bond: This letter is in regard to your request for Code Enforcement files prior to March 2001. A search of City records has not produced enforcement files prior to March 2001. I am still searching City files for enforcement documentation. However, I did not want to delay sending you the other information that you have requested. Therefore, I am sending you the contents of MLP90-00011 and MLP1999-00016 and I will keep looking for any additional information until I exhaust all possible options. I am available to answer questions and otherwise assist you as may be required at 503-639-4171, extension 317. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. If I am not available, please leave your name and phone number so that I can call you back as soon as possible. Sincerely, -- - 1 ..--- c f s' f M tt Scheidegger Assistant Planner I/curpin/mathew/code/Bond/12.27.01 c: MLP90-00011 Land use file MLP1999-00016 Land use file - MIS2001-00016 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639=4171 TDD(503)684-2772 , Receipt #: 27200100000000003690 Date: 09/10/2001 TIDEMARK COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. ' Line Items: ' Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due RECEXP Recovered Expenditures(labels)-23.0000 @$1.00 100-0000-479000 $23.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Check JACK BOND 0 6246 0 $23.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $23.00 WILL CALUPICK UP Fill out'i:his form completely and attached it securely to the document(s). Bring it to the WILL CALL/ PICK OF area at the Front Counter and file in the appropriate alphabetical slot by last name/company. (' Tn. l`�G &MIL' c(-6 01 COMPANY NAME: DOCUMENT NAME: A(Irdgere-A71) FROM: DEPARTMENT: (F/K/A,c_ DATE TO WILL CALL: 8.02 FEE: If the document is not picked up within 5 working da""s of the "DATE TO WILL CALL", the document w Ja returned to the originator. RETURNED TO ORIGINATOR DATE: q 1" WILL CALUPICK UP - Fill out this form completely and attached it securely to the document(s). Bring it to the WILL CALL/ PICK UP area at the Front Counter and file in the appropriate alphabetical slot by last name/company. ,Tack TO: (35)(a._ COMPANY NAME: '! &o „ c-s DOCUMENT NAME: ;5I0-L I) -0-06h F(_ JI. - DEPARTMENT: P(Z/l DATE TO WILL CALL: W/(<'/O/ FEE: 013-UU If the document is not picked up within 5 working P 9 days of the "DATE TO WILL CALL", the document will be returned to the originator. RETURNED TO ORIGINATOR DATE: � (hi') 1/ AUG 06 '01 03 28P RAMIS CREW CORRIGAN P.1 r *DAP CRAW FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHE ) Go0/ CORRIGAN' & � 00 1f' BACH CH, ILP kv w k v Practicing as Hibbard. Caldwell exVS‘ .,rejsjAV Schultz l Ramis&Crew THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONSIST OF ATTORNEY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL in Oregon City INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED BELOW. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR THE EMPLOYEE OR ' ATTORNEYS AT LAW AGENT RESPONSIBLE TO DELIVER IT TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT,YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION,DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR,PLEASE IMMEDIATELY 1727 N,W.Hoyt Street Portlond,Oregon 97209 (503)222.4402 - - - DATE: August 6, 2001 CLIENT NO,: 90024-04 • TO: ' Jim Hendryx City of Tigard FAX NO,: 684-7297 TELEPHONE NUMBER.: 639-4171 FROM: Timothy V. Ramis DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED: Copy of letter from attorney John Gibbon dated 8/1/01 t: Haskell Trust appeal, COMMENTS: Please call Heidi Decker of this office to let her know how you want us to proceed. • 2 PAGE(S)TO FOLLOW, EXCLUDING COVER SHEET. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THE PAGES,PLEASE CALL THE UNDERSIGNED AT(503)222-4402, IMMEDIATELY. THANK YOU. • SIGNED: Sharon R. Beisley,Legal Secretary and Assistant to Tim Ramis [ ] AN ORIGINAL IS BEING MAILED j ] AN ORIGINAL IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST • • e 44,50740,-040,67 • ARt_p 1949-Dom/6, • ,AUG 06 '01 03:28PM RAMI CREW CORRIGAN P.2 I; John T. Gibbon,Attorney at Law "" ( ) - ' Ceti(503 Sole Practitioner (503)7013-6708 PrcbirehtsiwYr tasacorn ' Admitted in Oregon & Washington OFFICE Practicing a Law Offices that also corm the runs of John 13425 SW 72nd Ave. Shonh *r,P.C.a wM-NoeLschor B Assoc.,P.C.. The TIGARD, OREGON 97223 Sys�'t few fees are �r and associate • Phone(503)624-0917 fax by agreement with FAX(503)684-8971 EMPHASIZING REAL ESTATE & LAND USE LAW RECEIVED August 1, 2001 AUG 0 3 2001 Timothy V. Ramis, Ramis Crew Corrigan Bachrach RAMIS LECEW ami Cr Hoyt St. CORRIGAN&BACHRACH,LIP 1727 ATTORNEYS AT LAW Portland, OR 97209 VIA FAX- 503-243-2944 Re: Haskell Trust v. City of Tigard, LUBA No. 2001-119 Dear Counsel: I wanted to send a brief letter on this matter. I believe that my client would agree to either stay or mediate this case and condition either action on his continuing to proceed with a new effort to work through the City's land use planning process. He now understands the need to divide the land in a manner consistent with the zoning and modify the uses on the property to bring them into compliance with the current zoning ordinance, in order to resolve this problem with the City. But it is essential in order to protect the trusts investment in the property (a second position taken over through a deed in lieu of foreclosure)that it continue to make maximum use of the property (maintaining the rental use) while pursuing the planning approvals that brings the properties structures and uses into compliance with the current zoning. Be advised if this matter is not stayed by mediation I plan to submit objections to the record and alternatively request an evidentiary hearing that will permit my client to - supplement the record with PGE records regarding electricity use on the property prior to 1959. These are items the company can only obtain through a hand search at $25.00 per hour cost (per item 4 of the application) and my client believes where he left it with the City staff prior to the issuance of the decision that he would obtain those -col!s 'f the we = -ede• to -ach = •os"tive dec'sion on the • Con o u i use aPplication. Further I will be requesting that the record be supplemented by what I understand to be at least two prior applications to the City to obtain a nonconforming use approval for the parcel with negative results followed by, at the least, city inaction in enforcing agreements reached with the property owner. If this matter proceeds to briefing my main approach in this case will be to challenge the City's failure to weigh the submitted evidence and it's reliance solely on the lack of one type of evidence specified in the ordinance. I see this as an understandable but incorrect reading of the ordinance as well being an incorrect application of the law of nonconforming uses. •AUG 06 '01 03:29PM RAMIS CREW CORRIGAN P.3 I S Regardless of the interesting legal questions presented by this case I am hopeful that we can resolve this dispute in a more practical and efficient manner by working to develop a plan that establishes the property in full compliance with the zoning as soon as possible. Please give me a call by Friday morning to see if this is a viable option. Sincerely, "hn T. Gibbon Attorney at Law lt9 Enclosure:0 cc: file, client, LUBA( • �Gt T, • • • j onts May 21, 2001 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Jack Bond 920 SW Stephenson Court Portland, OR 97219 RE: Legal Nonconforming Use. Dear Mr. Bond: This letter is in regard to your request for a legal nonconforming use at 9640 SW Frewing Street. Based on the information that you have submitted and records obtained through the Land Use Department at Washington County, I have come to the following conclusions: Q County records show the property to be designated R-7 from 09/04/59 to 06/12/73, RU-4 from 06/12/73 to 12/27/83 and R-5 from 12/27/83 to the time the property was annexed into the City of Tigard. b Records submitted by the applicant show the house to have been a multi- family dwelling only as far back as 1964 and the accessory structure a duplex as far back as 1984. In order to proceed with the legal nonconforming designation, I will need evidence that the main house and the accessory structure were converted into multi-family dwellings prior to 1959. Staff will also need to conduct a site visit with the City's housing inspector to verify how many units are in each building and that they meet City housing standards. If you wish to proceed with a site visit, please call to schedule an appointment at (503) 639-4171, x317. Sincerely, Mathew S heidegger Assistant Planner is\curpin\mathew\rnlp l 999-00016.acc.acc6.doc c: MLP1999-00016 Land Use File 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 • /' \ • •- � LL6' . 0'e ....- 0. �, d � Vn SS . ! .105 c19 • N ysb s, • S °° 05ry �\ 4404 J 6e t •`�� .off ��°�- \ °9 \ ozp yy pis Ss gyp, / �r1 �9 �, / ��• •b b ti l '064) �2 C.). 5-5 \ O\ (0 \ � b�db� o^. dy / pp • r O \\1 �O / " / r ' z a o Zz ,/ /p ,Z • .. s, za. tid a \ �• N. (2 `'(ti c p� a ‹�2 - d�S0r \ .Y. �oO �� N$?o ,q t' c.Oeeb � . -tir S g.1,40 bp \ \ Sig G • • \•.....ek \1hJj� •gF4/ '' O \ e‘1` • A1.15 jl ? \�N OS� ,T x 't° '� Sr gF ,1 1yp Se \ ti r� ' f . p.SO 4' .p0 1 � +\c' O 4 pO gS r r� Y� 9 ro /(‘, 4 ��S l z . r0 .00.g d}+S :iii/C)9 •9e,`4, \• • i �. ry Op. ? 00.oo g�\�d f �00p0 s f• • • `900• F2 '' 6AOgad ! .I • • / • S G zd / o / 6 b, ao\p \ y S \ COI /i 1 \ `oo ,O S \ • •\ .c-0. h� yS4, �/ so 5')h9 A ./.6'4, C, �9 OSOdoa� D o i hti N < Y do 4 G 6 / 0c4 S S°~0 \��O\ �O \b4 o b')d2d 0 ry \ • �s f �A• wry- \ t N -fb. N 6py0id O °C�c �b/--\\\u a C S e. !az g i \�8 s�.N py II 0',A.,60,6, c' N a�2` ) �`��v��� • �s h `/p/ f . c r O • oO��0 Z )1��J • 1'„J O \ y� 1 Kiev 01,... 6-p� \_\ O jls/� x'00 tiry �S ,k�• • .)6,60 \bbl )•00S\. S�gF `+o r0 , - •�5 � s,s? 85 4, • a \ 4,6 94 t ''00 . . , •o ' tio° '46,-s�,� S \ .4,4,..0,..,./a \ ) t.00 ) 4 e b . t•00. .• -_..- --- 8680g�d \ ry� j • 'V \ N . • - — . . . . .. ., „ . . • . . :,„ . . .. . . _. - ..••:. .: -, -, ., r.. .. -,.. . L4 ',i.J -.1...:S;-. tz, r7t,.. 4..:.ttst I tka..../Nt. WI\it-:t:IL t S-' .V:1-1. b IZ31.b" I U b*&-feie3.. '- ' — t-' 0.4•10,3 q,, . " -'':. ; •: SEP 14 ''99:.1-3:26 FR TER1.1 NE a3m(xp.Ts- 503.,650.:@199 TO-021.03,:.:...'..,::- -,,'-;.„:, •.14.;(3.t/a-:.:.. ..::- .: .. :-:-:.: • .,.,r2..: . - , . ., . •,-_„}:-...,....,,..f...:,..':-.:':.-'.:.: :.'-..:,i-:.,......F.:. :,:-:':z.. -,: ...-: . ... ...,-..-,-.',- . , ' . ',:. 0,, .: '. - •- ..- !'.'-: . .2., . ..; . .. • . ... . _ .• r . . . •• . - ' --. ' : ' - ' ' '.'' :.':' ' '-'' .7.-'.--• 2 .;'.--,.. ":",':f -:.; -.:-.''', . _ .---:-..-:..1 •1 :-'-:.- ',.-.- •,.• " - *.- .; ',-- r - ' • . • i5-:;.--:-;:-- -,"'•. -•-.'- -::.'''....;'-';':- :::';.-.:.:.:. --,-'.--,:-:'• .' ..-.; :-.- .-- -. -, :' 1 . . '.-- ,:, -' . .- -;; .. . . -* : AT-7„,,,7-.11.?,,.,„Ti.-. ..:-,z::_,1 . - -- _ .._ .. ,---;,-.,•-',--z4.-- - .,.-5...-v:-.n•-„-....-,,, . - .... .- - . • . . .'-:,, ''?. .: . ... , ... ; • . . • - . . . . . . , r=-..---- . ,"--7.7"--. . 7 - :: : :-., -,'.:. - ..- -, -- *.. ',-.-. -:: ,•--;:r", , •'_, .:--... : :•: . • : - - .. . . ., , • , . • : "':-.••••::::.;?:,. :..";.:n=;--,,,•..:1- ;;;.:-'...- , I .;';-..' '' 1 *:' ,. • . . -.. •- - •• - • - • : ::.::.,3!!: ...;.4:,•-,,,..?.,...`,!:•::m.'":.:-,•.,,,, - / : : ' ,, :, lkif ' ''. '.:/: s:. A : '''''•.'*: ' . ' : ''..• . . - '' - • .. . " .. ' .. • • . ' . - . ' . . • . ." . i• ' ••••:;-::::::.'_:,;.:.:..s7.1: ik-7‘.'' ,'-' . <9- .. , ' \ ' , , . . - ./ . . . . . . . • 1 . ..;:,-•:',. :.,:i,i'.",:::::::1,:,-;-::::-''''... :-: • . . .. \ . \ \\' . . .1.• . - N / /:// . i/ Nt . . . . / 9, . / \ \ • . 1 • -• . - ii. \--.. \. • : • . •. • 1 - / . .4X po, Z. i - i / / 45-; (0/./- P . ! \ 4) \ g ' . cb- '4 \t • i / / (19 /'<o* .-1• Ov ' > \• 44c'\ I i / zcfr / ...... •.- i / /t v c 7"1.,- 24„, Az'co- ss . \ \ '3. \ g : / e,:.i• (:.‘' \ 0 \ • / I"C-‘. * ,;.° 0 T \ ca t i i ........-4," / / 6 .•<," ,:-) ,,\) ' \ i , / _., .,9...,,,.... : p, 1 / / c)• vL01- \?'‘.›.. \ • • , . '' / / f....„,,,..,.-s-_,,,; 1 ..: \ ''',s— i /-,..>. / i /N ' • ',-,-., _...:\ \ I C„.3. e.4./ X . ,.. _ 6 ,,- ,-,,,, \ Nec‘ n . 1 / N- - ,.6 /: \(2-- , n ` : 0%. \ .•....)1/4 \ II i \ •— It/ / 41° .- \Al it. ., ., -' 1 \ \ \ II i / .,13 cP ''.fjo P S', (0° \ ..z‘.3 . \ \ . . .,••• .; ch.„,e2 N.,. , 1 I ...AN° \ I / ix::- ... ... 7-7\1/4 • , .,--- 1.. \ f."7,-. i ! . ...2N- co: \1 \\„- \ \ \ ! / •\/ ' e. \'' ‘ , \ \ 1 a ,...:•.K.-:-1:4:-:*;.::=-:::,?::::::::::_,.z;.-. •:-....zE::-?:.! q. -• - \ \ .... - • • -1,, •/ - cr \ \ \ 1 1 " --;-<---- /\\- ■ ‘ ,1 - — -: ' .../ ..--- ,.-..-P‘' , - . , ,- , \ ' . . i / q,:). ./.1r ‘ \ CY - vv1;•1,. . _, \ \ 1 I -.fii'l , \ i/cii' -...- \ \ [ I : ,,,,,k--_j - ' I i i ..p \ \\. \ I e i.,. 4 - \ \ H \ ,.......," ‘ _,-/.. \ N X \‘ + V \ 0 > N \ ..,---"?' C-17 y \ A • i 4.,\ N., \ \ : • I \ Ns- — .. . . ,..., ._ \ 1 ,6).\\„) . \c•t.Y) I'k 4 1 Ns I , • - 1 9.. _, ;:),\\ . - I-Oi 1 \ \ 15 I • , ■ '0.s,‘ \ N \ • 1 k-•%I, N..„, \ 4-.); (i \ t:Xl.:;' s,.-ii • - . .; - --.' \ , 1 S' \ '7 \ X‘? /-.)(.--- - ,85` - TAX LOT 200, . ....7.- \ ..c. ...c..,n - " 't 'C.,- . SCALE DRAWING 2S 1W 2CD ,- • v.,,, \ -44 1 I ": 37 h' 1 ., r - „. ---- S.W. 1/4 SEC. 2,T.25., RAW., W.M._ c,.,A- s , ii 1$ . • , . -•. , I . ,,, p -, la • . \-1 \ ilk : '--.-,0c \O N' c)9 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON . I ..: SEPTEMBER 13, 1999 Centerlin Concepts Inc, 1 - ... ,-- • I . .•. . • - . . -:- . DRAWN BY: MSG' - CHECKED BY: WGD111 1 o , -.:.-:,..ii?..,4•:1„-;...:.;,:-,c,:-.;:---: .-,-: . 0;„ , SCALE r-•-g:30= ACCOUNT ;150-3623 640 /32nd Drive Glodstorte, Oregon 97027 7' :-,:,...-::':.;_-•:-;',:.':::,.::-..:,L.• ',::::: ::::. :•1'‘.2•••-•:'- -,••;;-0-:-..,Pf-.?::•::.• I . M!V3ND\e OND-IA CK BON \8 ON0SC - 1 •A--- • . 303 650-oies it:IY 503 650-0159 • '..-!:-:z3.:zs;.:„.i-,37::).::::.,:.1,.,.:7,,....... .,•_ • • • :::,.i..,..,-..:i:..-,:.:::i„,:;.. ::,- .:-...-::;-..::-;:-:-:,:?:;:: • ;.:,• -•-:4.:.-::;:i:'.::;:77,4::.1,:',._:,,,5*..4:;'.',:.,"*-.::;•-:- . .. . ,. :.!::'S::..-;-.):::.,:: :'.:;:;.•::. :::,:7:.a .,;"...'? TOTAL PGE.03 1 A - - - . • . _ . . . • . :•:•;.:-3::.;:..--;;Z.:3i;;;.:;:;::: ::J..,...z5:2...-,:i:::..:::- • .,r,::,,,:.:2;:g.0:,:-.;*.-..;. :-:,-..-,s.:*_;-..: ,---:-!-::,-; . . . . . . . . • • -- ' ' ' '• . . - '• - . . .- ' - . • • • :%,.. ..!5F.--1-i?if14:375-i?Z' '.:.:Iii:;-1.::-,-".it 2• • " ' •. . • • . . . .• . , . . . • -- ..-' .7.r.e''`.;-2[6:,.. `-;.-1;:;?. -N-i7.•';!.i.::a < . - ... . • . . ' •. . , . . . . . . . • ..-- - • . ' . . • CITY OF TIGARD • EXPENDITURE REQUEST This form is a multi-use form. Appropriate receipts and documentation must be attached to this form. Approved request due Tuesday 5:00 PM to A/P for checks by Friday(week opposite payroll only). VENDOR NO.: DATE: ?l/?1a/ PAYABLE TO : REQUESTED BY: at /P(á ,utyt k.ss°mil( SSQI(- 6 . s4-exitvicSou—c y ot * mes ghonInvo owe � aA oNoy , s nou -7117l0 c.uo� P -fi fiat pe 11 !!T0-0-0O Y3 9b ?SD .67) .1.4 4,P /q49-out)1(0 Pc ,c n,- Ape/Leta/61A- aAd ek,t _ 94 -39..4)/4?) TOTAL 01) Mileage 31f APPROPRIATION BALANCE: AS OF: PURCHASING: APPROVALS: (IF UNDER$50) Section Manager/Professional Staff (IF UNDER$2500) Division Manager (IF UNDER$7500) Department Manager (IF UNDER$25000) City Administrator (IF OVER$25000) Local Contract Review Board • - ^ ' - ���0 ���K �w� �r CITY OF TIGARD - RECEIPT OF PAYMENT RECEIPT NO. :99- 320197 CHECK AMOUNT : 811 . 00 CREDIT CARD : 0' 00 . CHANGE : 0. 00 NAME ^ HASSELL JEAN ^ ADDRESS : HAS5EL� °BOND JERRIE JEAN CASH AMOUNT : 0^ �0 _ , PAYMENT DATE : 12/06/99 920 SW STEPHENSON CT SUBDIVISION : -.PORTLAND OR 97219- - PURPOSE OF PAYMENT AMOUNT PAID PURPOSE OF PAYMENT AMOUNT PAID REC8VEREDEXPENDITURES 31. 00 LAND USE APPL 780. 00 12-01 LAND PARTITION APP, 2S102CD-0' 0 CHECK #119 PROP OWN ADDRESS LIST TOTAL AMOUNT PAID - - - -} 811. 00 / ___-____'-_'__---______-_____--�__-_--_- /.._ 7 , (2 o • i ar - rah a/4 vim- M F /997-OOO/� / 4 • / . 4 1 4, ,, ,► February 3, 2000 Lauri Aldridge • 9640 SW Frewing Street Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Notice of Incomplete Submittal - MLP1999-00016 Dear Ms. Aldridge: The City has received your application to partition 1 lot into 2. After a review of your submittal, staff has deemed your application submittal as incomplete. In order for staff to • proceed, the following materials will need to be submitted: Submit, to scale drawing showing: • Proposed 25-foot right of way on Frewing Street. • Proposed 30-foot Radius, right of way on the corner of Ash Avenue and Frewing Street. • Average lot size for Duplex lot. Once the required information has been submitted, staff can deem the application complete and begin the review process. An application is reviewed for compliance with all standards in effect at the time the application is deemed complete. • If you have any questions regarding your application or if I can answer any other questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x317. Sincerely, . - p3/_2 o Mathew Scheidegger Assistant Planner A t ' - 6P See-ee • is\c u rp I n\m a t h ew\m I p 199 9-00016.a cc.a cc3.d o c c: MLP1999-00016 Land Use File Y . ea.- Y G a • vp 5 I). 1117\e' .� y S / s/ x S6, ` • --: 0°I . / \ •o 052 � �, ✓x o .n �°� 2°g ���p. ��i S gyp/ f 59 A � �4, 9 �,� 0/ \ .0.\9\ r‘C?' 't). \ i .dik o \Nrb?1 p�, oti `� ^� / ,b .ro �s ,c .•ro: N sz &°.�s z i / ■�` a y° To �/ f p � p vo O�spa ¢!e2 \�/) \ /1 d� \k. �� �/ E E<.. s°°od`tip �� ���ti�o �� o S d , /4( •y� . o •-Yo 0 \ O ti� .i ti ry 1�'y. o b44_0., N..... (2.., l S/`l .°OS `ice S'' \ ,cy -00 \ ZSF p • "o •SZ\ 4' °� `l1 �b�l Nix_ BFI ° N 3J -111 J\4_..7 \r7riii app &F 40. / 'F 6g�a 8F S • ti �p S2al ci, \ �� J O• O• O . ,. h1 Ot •)Ocs \ 2a O ova b •.) t • ? 8 a� O• .. 2. •F��O,a l} Fla d 60 �."8 ,9 N � • • ��d .8 • / r' c' aG , cr \ s ' ti \ S'b ■ 3 ^�h � O a ��.n\ � - o o o / Oyu F .� \ h• /\ {do oO(bJ : ,,--' / U� 5° \ 9 �O \bA 4"..)&i."1 b 0 Y / 1 s 1 .^ �ry \ / / /6z Fg 1 / n f / / d -!. -9�j / N.bl \ Oo :,-,s,. Z \ ���Odc / `; `�i c b S u�i, ti/� 14�• e, . (7,,>60,6/ti le2 \lZ ��1� d�1190 \s� p/ F i �0 0 1�,y�j1 dp ��bJ/O \ c;:71- 'k, .9 4, ry b��O _\f OHO �'� •O-41.., R, >S. b \bh �° .oOS\ gF 4,° y \ ti o` • 11 {y \1 /d SF y .00 N 0J`` '.�'y • fl y01 x`00 \�.Ss S28F -t�� \ ti !�O�rO AF WOOS \ p ■ \ /ryp• S .� 7./ `_aO0• Sd} �ry 95�� S \ - p �' OO• t•00.• ,: �y. b 2a ., t-oo- . o� ad, • A O O08 \ ` --- --_ - �h - . f: i[ Ei ? b y i.i= rt{ lr1itthZ1l t.UlV" J . SEP•,'14 - 13:26; FR CENT CBI PTS: 503 65 0189-TO':6242103.' �'.1`� -:trIb,'_ �e.s f ,171:5_ .!U b�t{ 1F�5 '.h'.f1JI�J,5 IJ+ 4 . , : 1 d'k\ • /- - : - • \ - • . , . . - _... \ - . / Cpc 5. / / \ . . / " • 1‘4D4 \C / �` S e`.4 o 1=t), er" ;`` \\ \ 1 I r • ! �� ! ap \ \ i 1 '53 r, \d' `y �� t \ • I ! tl P is 0 : 1 /� >� `�•°' \ `\\ 1 i - • 1 1. O -175:_ \!� <r :•:- N. ■ ' _,,,,,, ..-, \ \ _,,,': ------ ./ „'■\ -04„f Ai-- _..e.".#00,A,<°- ,‘ 2„/ .0! ‘ ! i -f .\..., 4 1 ,.,,,, -J \ \t �\ @ @� • c. 1 / - 4► \ � - ai i \ \� : • }'� O ° �� - / r t• \:\ \.1 P- 1 , 4,,, \ i \ , __. \\,"+""F'" __.,"C *, ,. .., - / \ ,_.--, \ 1 _ ... : t� ' r r i f \ •. 7 _ Y / i t _.1 \ \ • ��" % T An LOT 20�J,SALE DRAWING 1 E! w ' S.1M. # SEC. 2.T.25., R_1 VV., W.M. I ` a I .� P� Irk.'.- \ . ..n y� - ii • \01 - • �-' WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON a - SEPTEMBER 13, 1999 Cnterline Concepts lnc- c DRAWN 8Y: MSG CHECKED BY: WGDlli ! . c-s- /0.,/,... ; I SCALE LE 1°=3O ACCOUNT 15O-3623 6L0 SZ,Id ^rive Gtodsta�e. Oregon 97027 •!,!y\BP�J\Bq"�q-JAgKBq�1�\80NGSC 5�J3 65b-4186 4dY 503 650-019 ; AL--..' . . ! • • 'Y- ; ;'-_ 4'-=.,:r::_ - . 0 • 1 =,-; »'ssr=.rte _;,,:.. • N :: .' !: i PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN CHECKLIST Project: 1.112t tE a27-c / FOR Date: 1/4(z. LAND USE APPLICATION SUBMITTALS ❑ COMPLETE. . []INCOMPLETE • • GRADING • ' 20a Existing and proposed contours shown? NIA — sil` ` G-.V `pP' t-' -Ero pr Are adjacent parcels impacted by proposed grading? El Yes E]'No P.Adjacent parcel grades shown? STREET ISSUES • Er Right-of-way clearly shown?. E21 Centerline of street clearly shown? r Name of street(s) shown? ' wST P�.e�P 1.; -Existing/proposed curb or edge of.pavement shown? : , _ . G'AA Profiles of proposed streets ,; p�►�tr Z 04 Future Streets Plan provided? (subdivisions and some partitions),','��� ¢�,ok S�t 105 ❑ profiles •❑ topo shown on adjacent property? .','/ "ro Gz� ❑ z-c..4ND�S . DoL.o...i - s-c V�,4' Traffic study required/submitted? 5,1, THE GGz c M Do proposed street grades comply with City standards?. At Check widths proposed on public streets'--=------- - - / _1'''r'F c brit auto ¢ APflfEJA In 4 Are private streets proposed? ❑ under 6 lot minimum? �a %-GAS Tr+�/ P �� -� ❑ commercial driveway entrance required. Iv- �(i+e 9-rl f U uAt._. ❑ width appropriate? i irk .- --F, 1 - - Mi j, ❑Other: r t S vceS - gi tn1 1.(.A Tom! F6 t . uI 4-AN Dzec WC coal-4-1 S ITARY SEWER ISSUES sltz.v:) Ti-+orc T E ► a j Existing/proposed lines? v1/4),,,,4 ‘MPRo -r-1 s- .¢- $, 01-14. Stubs to adjacent parcels required? ATER ISSUES /(4-1 200,9 Existing/proposed lines? [a-�° Existing/proposed fire hydrants? , _ _ ORM DRAINAGE AND WATER OUALITY ISSUES ��CC ax"b5■°1-1 T'AG 0 Existing/proposed lines? � T tr��� f IssvE w -EHA Preliminary sizing calculation of water quality.provided? (14P44-14.44 1 (1/4 ? Ali Nssr t• — ��Ip• Water quality facility shown on plan? � �[ .) T El does area provided match calculations for size requirement? `-i pA .,42-144 Stubs to adjacent properties required? 4„..g___ Pr- � S ' • . IA A" Water quality and/or detention shown outside of any wetland buffer? FS--- /(42.4.0 • i:\eng.briann asters\public facility plan checklist.doc • • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . . . . Date Received TO: City Of Tigard ATTN: --Ti.(_< I (c< --4 tk 14" • s DEC 151999 DEPT: 1 Q 03 1 � UNITY 4EYELOPMEl'' r" :i vj ��r�-::::,","A:::::.:::::)-. ...-;1'W.l'::::::gW::::: :. :1::?.i::;,',.:-:-!:i. .:-::::.:-::::E.i.:.•:',."-:::?::::::; :i' i t'om. ,f ,:. ,'v:�it,r. fv, „........„,...5,::::,_. ..:_;,.:,,,..,..,,,::::::;;„:,.:::::,,::.-.,.--:-:- ...,..: ...::::::::.,:::g:::....„-:.; :- .: . - ..-:-:-...k.,,....:::::.... _ . . ,. ... ....:.:.::.:.::::. c `:Name r;�orta at �C ?' ,...s.‘y om..r Qf ! tt .Pro ect Namea „ . i G: • Wit. ne . "Pho r .:.Y l; r j:5' ............ %fib j,V �Fax:> �> , �:7. rr, .iK�v fi r/ 5v: s.'s � !i:':4i r: Y v is jJ •y f�. %v. 4 i... Y...r. .. 1:�r r• � • Comments du ._2, _,,,L,2_, 6?), Ad.dluAe6Q/S"-Qii, `-----iltvAQ a/L.12_ i)ctil jt,,,,iy,i 6,,,A. 6/4)/-40 czto —1--c-e-4-0‘Al .'ci-i --ttkp .,Q,KiuLab-peA P ,c),_,„;,., .,a,,,,,I 44,8-v) 6_6.-r-,-12-e- e 62-A-4--.,, „,,,, t,2_,, ,,_, - e_a_. a� l , ....._ transmittalform o /9-61 — ALP LAND PARTITION —7-D.J.-lo'-�-9 H� fla:,1,1A TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP.HELD WITH: �14.I►a, ]/a ch K DATE OF PRE-APP.: i—/O —?`>� Property Address/Location(s): (it 46 so fretx. I1 S�reet U FOR STAFF USE ONLY akA 13510 S ) Ils1A Pk ue. Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): a. S` o; e..1- - aco Case No.(s): 7 7- (f7f / ' Site Size: e o.CC2 Other.Case No.(s): Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: i-AuR\ PtAritA Receipt No.: — Q 1' Application Accepted-By:: Address: -1��LO S CP�s)I SM, Phone:(o. 0-3670 Q� Date:• City: �g0�r0\ ■ �� zip: 12 3 Applicant*: v 8001\.e____ Date'Determined To_Be Complete: Address: Phone: " Comp.Plan/Zone-Designation: City: Zip: * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the CIT Area: applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession ::Recording Date and Number: , with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner -° with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in . the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written - : Rev11126t98 is\curpintrriastersUandpait:doc authorization with this application. - - PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request permission to REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS allow a Land Partition to: divide 1 g acre_ into ' 2-- l'y+;'' ✓ Application Elements Submitted: (total area) (#of parcels) Application Form containing I5-1\$ ' St.t: and l '9 g 7 s_q, -cT, [Owner's Signature/Written Authorization (sq. ft. or acre ) (sq. ft. or ages) KTitle Transfer Instrument or Deed kroCk-■- car. ctiM 0NQI Q--Site/Plot Plan (provide any additional information here) (#of copies based on pre-app check list) t∎0cor inka"- Dft..) r- _ la---Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/:'x 11") I 12/II' Applicant's Statement ak-el, I (#of copies based on pre-app check list) I ate, v64 �l ❑ 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped Legal Size Envelopes 6/0* di 4 iflte-e-e LAI) []Filing Fee $780.00 Va-,e--1 Citif- 4 fir[ -A ' , , "D • Lie I List any VARIANCE OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: (�Art� ,uce. `I ti u tAi-(A n ) ik 1tQa( lot SilUGe- �I���1X11J ohs % -:e-xi5--S TIC er ktrecQ cq .tace tcj _ 'IS Ike re-0 C APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT:. • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this o7 7- day of d IJDI/ern , 19 / / Owner' Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 • June 27, 2001 CITY OF TIGARD Jack Bond OREGON 920 SW Stephenson Court Portland, OR 97219 Dear Mr. Bond: This letter is in regards to your Minor Land Partition Application (MLP1999-00016). The last time we met to discuss your application was April 03, 2001 . Based on that meeting, a letter was sent to you asking for additional information needed to proceed with your application: • Proposed 25-foot right of way on Frewing Street. • Proposed 30-foot Radius, right of way on the corner of Ash Avenue and Frewing Street. • Submit plan showing: proposed property lines for a 2-lot partition, setbacks drawn to scale. • Fourteen (14) copies of the narrative and plans. • Request 500-foot property owner mailing list. Mailing lists are only good for three months. I have included a request form with this letter. As of June 27, 2001, I have not received the information above. Therefore, the City will withhold deeming your application complete until July 13th, 2001. If additional information has not been received by July 13th' 2001, the City will deem your application complete and issue a denial based on the most current information provided. If you have questions regarding your application or if I can answer any other questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at (503)-639-4171, x317. Sincerely, Mathew Scheidegger Assistant Planner I:\curpin\mathew\m1p 1999-00016.accl 0 c: MLP1999-00016 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 • • May 21, 2001 Jack Bond 920 SW Stephenson Court Portland, OR 97219 RE: Legal Nonconforming Use. Dear Mr. Bond: This letter is in regard to your request for a legal nonconforming use at 9640 SW Frewing Street. Based on the information that you have submitted and records obtained through the Land Use Department at Washington County, I have come to the following conclusions: 4 County records show the property to be designated R-7 from 09/04/59 to 06/12/73, RU-4 from 06/12/73 to 12/27/83 and R-5 from 12/27/83 to the time the property was annexed into the City of Tigard. 4 Records submitted by the applicant show the house to have been a multi- family dwelling only as far back as 1964 and the accessory structure a duplex as far back as 1984. In order to proceed with the legal nonconforming designation, I will need evidence that the main house and the accessory structure were converted into multi-family dwellings prior to 1959. Staff will also need to conduct a site visit with the City's housing inspector to verify how many units are in each building and that they meet City housing standards. If you wish to proceed with a site visit, please call to schedule an appointment at (503) 639-4171, x317. . Sincerely, Mathew Scheidegger Assistant Planner i:\cu rpin\mathew\mlp 1999-00016.acc.acc6.doc c: MLP1999-00016 Land Use File • • April 6, 2001 Jack Bond 920 SW Stephenson Court Portland, OR 97219 RE: Notice of Incomplete Submittal - MLP1999-00016 Dear Mr. Bond: This letter is in regard to our meeting on 04/03/01. I have outlined what is needed by Tigard's Planning Department in order to deem your Minor Land Partition complete. However, in light of new information received, some new issues have arisen that relate to a previous attempt to partition in 1990 and information you provided. In our meeting on 04/03/01, you indicated that the house located at 9640 SW Frewing Street was converted into a multi-family dwelling in the 1950's and that the Duplex was also legally constructed. However, based on your information, no building permits were required at the time of construction from Washington County. As a result, establishing legal nonconformity, will be a condition of the partition approval. Please review the criteria of Chapter 18.760.020A.2. Information gathered from the original Minor Land Partition application (MLP90-0011) shows 3-units existed in the main house (9640 SW Frewing Street) and 2-units in the accessory building. According to documents in the MLP90-0011 file, the Van Schotens were given (3) options based on 5-units being occupied on the parcel: 1. The City of Tigard issue a denial to the request of partitioning due to the property exceeding the maximum density allowed in the R-4.5 zoning district. 2. Mr. and Mrs. Van Schoten withdrawal their application and recover a`portion of their expense. 3. The City of Tigard issues an approval subject to permanent removal of at least one existing dwelling unit. Thus dropping the density to 4-dwelling units on the property. On 12/06/1999, Lauri Aldridge submitted a Minor Land Partition for the same property to divide the same .8 acres into 2 lots containing 15,188 square feet and 18.987 square feet. According to Mrs. Aldridge's narrative, the Aldridge's ceased the rental in the basement and started using it as storage from 1993 to 1995. Based on this information, there can only be 2 units in the house and 2 units in the structure to the west. If two duplexes exist on the property then the partitioned lots will need'to be a minimum of 10,000 square feet each. However, as I mentioned above, if the decision is issued as an approval, it will be conditioned that you successfully gain an approval of nonconformity based on the criteria of 18.760.020.A.2 (Nonconforming Situations). • • Submittal Requirements: • Proposed 25-foot right of way on Frewing Street. • Proposed 30-foot Radius, right of way on the corner of Ash Avenue and Frewing Street. • Submit plan showing: proposed property lines for a 2-lot partition, setbacks drawn to scale. According to the plan included with this letter, the house is shown to have a 15-foot rear yard setback and an access easement is shown extending to the carport. If a 15-foot setback is not feasible, then a 20 percent adjustment must be applied for. A 20 percent reduction would require the rear yard setback to be 12 feet. I have provided an adjustment application with this information. The fee for the adjustment is $20.00 instead of$100.00. • Fourteen (14) copies of the narrative and plans. • Request 500-foot property owner mailing list. Mailing lists are only good for three months. I have included a request form with this letter. Once the required information has been submitted, staff can deem the application complete and begin the review process. An application is reviewed for compliance with all standards in effect at the time the application is deemed complete. If you have any questions regarding your application or if I can answer any other questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x317. Sincerely, Mathew Scheidegger Assistant Planner i:\curpin\mathew\m1p1999-00016.acc.acc5.doc c: MLP1999-00016 Land Use File I jthibi / - - •rovement Detail Maintenance- - Property ID : R467284 2S12CD-002Imp I2 Segment 1 OF 3 Type Improvement : R (RESIDENTIAL) Nbhd : 5TIG 1 . Type Segment : MA (MAIN AREA) 2 . Appr Method : R Unit Pr=42 . 1 13 . Heat/AC : 09 3 . Class • : R23 • 14 . Fireplace . 4 . Area : 1424 Eff : i424 15 . Ceiling : 20 Dimensions 16 . Inter Comp : APP, APP 17 . Exter Comp : 02 5 . Const Style : 18 . Electric : 01 19 . Bedrooms : 04 6 . Foundation : 01 s-20 Year Built : 1925 ✓ Eff : 1950 7 . Exter Wall : STR=02, COV=04 1 . Conditibn: Depre : 77 8 . Inter Finish: 01 22 . % Adjust : LCM 106 Nbh% : 110 9 . Roof Cover : 01 10 . Roof Style : 01 11 . Flooring : STR=01, COV=14 23 . Rep. Cost : 66,300 ( 89 . 78) 12 . Plumbing : BATH=02, FIX=9 24 . Mkt Value: 59, 520 Enter 'N' for Next page, <RET> or 'X' to Exit : IL) 0.S t�re U cl11 � ` � e,ccec tve, ca} A-� o ? 5°J jac0, ,„,,, ,',1slkouseS 03 tcteo cS vox 0.g Q.�� 0.S 0.gea O-CCArA • 4 lir. 3 pifProperty ID: R46728. Imprement I2 51 o s1 ./-ask Ave„ 62 46 20 a:0 . W'Cts MA 24 24 USF 24 --16--- . X--22 24---- : 46 30 GRU 30 ----24---- : Enter <RET> to Return • • • • • • y. D. oar EXh i bit- # / - - lrovement Detail Maintenance • - ` Property ID : R467284 2S12CD-002Imp I1 Segment 1 OF 5 Type Improvement: R (RESIDENTIAL) Nbhd : 5TIG 4o $e- 9bto 1c ►o 1 . Type Segment: MA (MAIN AREA) 2 . Appr Method : R Unit Pr=39 13 . Heat/AC : 01 3. Class : R23 14 . Fireplace : FP1 4 . Area : 2300 Eff: 2300 15. Ceiling : 20 Dimensions 16. Inter Comp : APP, APP 17 . Exter Comp : 04 5. Const Style : 18 . Electric : 01 19. Bedrooms : 04 6. Foundation : 01 20 . Year Built : 1925 Eff: 1950 7 . Exter Wall : STR=01, COV=04 21 . Condition: Depre: 77 8 . Inter Finish: 01 22 . % Adjust : LCM 106 Nbh% : 110 9. Roof Cover : 01 10 . Roof Style : 01 11 . Flooring : STR=01, COV=07 23 . Rep. Cost : 100, 150 ( 89 . 78) 12 . Plumbing : BATH=04, FIX=15 24 . Mkt Value : 89, 910 Enter 'N' for Next page, <RET> or 'X' to Exit: - - Improvement Detail Maintenance - - Property ID : R467284 2S12CD-002Imp I2 Segment 1 OF 3 Type Improvement: R (RESIDENTIAL) Nbhd : 5TIG 1 1 . Type Segment: MA (MAIN AREA) ��leX 1351 0 SO Ash ,e, 2 . Appr Method : R Unit Pr=42 . 1 13 . Heat/AC : 09 3 . Class : R23 14 . Fireplace . 4 . Area : 1424 Eff: 1424 15. Ceiling : 20 Dimensions 16. Inter Comp : APP, APP 17 . Exter Comp : 02 5. Const Style : 18 . Electric : 01 19. Bedrooms : 04 6. Foundation : 01 20 . Year Built : 1925 Eff: 1950 7 . Exter Wall : STR=02, COV=04 21 . Condition: Depre: 77 8 . Inter Finish: 01 22 . % Adjust : LCM 106 Nbh% : 110 9. Roof Cover : 01 10 . Roof Style : 01 11 . Flooring : STR=01, COV=14 23 . Rep. Cost : 66, 300 ( 89. 78) 12. Plumbing : BATH=02, FIX=9 24 . Mkt Value: 59, 520 Enter 'N' for Next page, <RET> or 'X' to Exit: • +Lew _ _ A EXhih t # .2-. - - Witperty Data Selection Menu 0- -1 Owner: ALDRIDGE, LAURI DEL HANSEN Prop ID R467284 (Real Estate) (319090) 9640 SW FREWING ST Map Tax Lot: 2S12CD-00200 TIGARD, OR 97223 Legal : FREWING' S ORCHARD TRACTS, LOT PT 25, ACRES . 80 DBA Year Built : 1925; 1925 Situs : 9640 SW FREWING ST Living Area: 3966; 2528 Code Area : 023. 74 Sale Info : 06/19/97 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 249, 020 (+) Instrument: 97057814 Land $ 101, 380 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 350, 400 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 2, 994 . 30 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments Taxable RMV $ 350, 400 (=) * *** Unpaid Taxes *** M50 Assessed $ 200, 450 (1) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History ( . ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : , 'it^'- -- r,4', / -I CI '.'1 cl Ll Ll 1-:-) �, ' ' '....,..',•',;:;f `,f .r' 1 j', #[•:::,.,'..,,:,:*:.✓� .• '''.='-•••:-'-';':=;::./,'? '% � . , r 7771;;,•'...-."..' t` J [ r r ', 7 t({ , 4 ( _1 s r J '� r r ti Y + r t f.. £xuiibi* 03 .lr .c•S .r., „ati., rcl';''�. ,.. _ •. ., Rid' �'rr'�r'��. SEWER PERMIT /� 'rt ,4 't F 7 ) r� ., Unified Sewerage Agency j ,.1, /{—, rr ' ofwahin(ttonCounty CITY OF c1 (2 / - DATE ! v - _; •.>yr % OWNER. - /L% /(11///j/�L j _-- PHONE :Z;E 9_ !7 70 C� 3. ''.'iJ. r J ASS: / _. Iy.! 1•s ` ?_ OWNER'S AS RE SS. / J S-9 U StA(li2�i, K,A, ' 261/6 1 lv '7-1- v•,ru Q-c.,.wti i ,,`:`�' 1 `• rt'; ,...*i,.....•:,• •,.•„•':.."•7: I..,,::,•,•,••: :.-,•••••,,,:.,'":•••••••.;-•-•:•;i:; .;-,,..:• , ,i.,,;'...',':.44:-;...'.,','..V.:':1`.4$ r.'":.- .;..-r.-g.-:.;2-.-:•;;'.: 11/44:f.,,i';..s.'1:c'{':.9,1::!:?:.?;k:1,,,,!..'..t;':!..V.(e.:..7,,:":.1,•;-`,4;•1■.*c`?,,A.',..,‘,,:.A;:.,,,t.,"?.14:„:, ,,,. ..- ..., ,/•..:To,..(,::..,':-..:}'.:.:,:,!..2:,.;•,117.,,s."...,41„,:):...,::,.:'41..•:'.,,,,,1114.,,.,..,!"..,':.!..:.-',;:;;:,..."1....e..;:•.....:1.:.:::::;;;•.';;■ j :'.1.;',. ': -. 1...\::::::;:1:::::',,11.:''::;.f.Z.,;1.4" :‘: 17:';;;.....": ': •'•;::: '; . :: i. i','^i1:4•:....1.%!:!,T0',., ' ■ :.•,,V,v, 7,f..-4,:i.i,"".1 . , •T:f4'...,,,,,,4.:..ill, ,.. /..,,,',,.•:,:,`,";....•.'i:e.,::.. :;...'',.- r.',1, :.'.1:.:.,,,•: . •. . ;-.-• ': i45:•;P-.-••4•' ' • I '..•:.:' VA-.!Jr.'"• • • ; ..i.1,--,.-.••::-......:2,z..4,,.::. ...I'•'-•:"'•'..:....,,,....i..,'..;:'''4'f'I,n•','.,'X...:5.4.,v7-.2..Z.i-.5 P.'=-.:.';• ,...-.,- 7....,''.,.......:,.-•i,.,1:,I.:;.7,.-,:•;::-:..,,'.•:.,;.!...‘...:.:-N),......t",...,:..1...-,.1.,..,,..Y./?....,;.. N!. "";-1 ,M Y ?)4 ? . • . •,.....• .', .,../I -' ,"V i '„ ...• ,' ,,,,,-.3..=:,...••, • ,,/,,':V-,i.,..T.'',.•I' :"...T.7f,V.t.•,';',7.,•.":•:.,•.!:; '..!■••.,•''''.'",:•••',7`'':' r•-•."•;'P a....t,'...1.,',',..6' p:Ii.:i1:`?".;:f.i2.77'. . ... r.• i • ••,),,,...•.,,li,.....;.,1.4,...7. , / . '.:%,,,,:.:1,;.(,-.%':,,;;:.'.•:,,! W:4.... ,.- ' C''''.f''..,-'1• . • :•::'77 ,0.•:',!',. :,...:?..,,:,. . ;,. . '';':.-e,..,'...:?..•., -.'•,....,.,....: !,.'.::4......-i . . •i.? I .', • ! • ..1 ry p-.-1 ..... . ,...„.,7,, ' . ,:.:*•..-:-e,1,..1 ..2 i , ......1 : , ; •... 4-1 k '..;":-..,:,`.••fr".,' ., -;:f,,;.;::". ;••y?;;:, • I & 4:P41 tot,' r•••••• .-.1 Vw 4.r, 4. / .t i..a .,.. . 'gm. ,re, ./■■•• if,;:.'f:....::-.: 4,,,,--:,:-1, • . I;NI+0 r t:.ta ; IL)ik.4 i'l.J*- 1 t '- ii, ..„, • ., ..... .... ,....? _ ...:41....y.:!;.:.„....,:„... 1::::-.:-.•.....!,,,4,-.:-,;',',I.• . I , t n . ....i,-, •...,:;/.,••.4%,:;,•:...,,,est.: .... ,, .•, . -- .....-...... :e.d ...--,.., --...,..,.5.,....,.,- y...,',,i••••;.•-h.!':-' I .: .. ._ f...:•;;;•:::::',..V.;;;; ;,,... ,...•.:.:;1',-,,,-.-••--4,.. ••••• ••••::••,.. :-!••; • •• - -.' INSPECTION TIME•. PERMIT YO ' P=i-,,,:!,;-;,•■■•:'F'.,••!,?, s, s.• .t•,...f' DATE: Y " A ?..... !....:‘TE ISSUED:_..1.L.. k. .,.,„. - I • OWNERS NAME: .. :,..,.....,:t,:,-.., ---- _ ■;:.1,'.•:/;•;:';'.. •/.!.',,:;•• ‘, :.l,11.,,..'.. ADDRESS :-•••<3. .... .44ete...Cfe.....-ele-4/ f•i.--11.,'Itif':::,','::'v`:, ,,:f.t/4-4,;,:•.iv-1.,,r.--:. 14,:,.' ,!I:':tt..;7'''' • .1..4r,:,_ CONTRACTOR ' • .....r.i....-.;.,, ....-..,,,•• ,..••.--:,....--. ...:',..,,,,---•,, . •--------—--------------------- ,;.-..,..::,:-: -,..;,,,--• I , •1,--',,.-,;:i..•.Y,,,,,..,,,‘ ':•‘:-.:.:;.;.,17:?!•.,•(;:,.,.:„!,,, TEST'. Air 0, Water 0 , Visua! 0 , Laboratory 0 ,,,,,..;...-,,,,- -.■,,,,,,. •,,,,,-....... 2.4.f.,'•,• RESULT: Approvell Disapproved 0 , Pending 0 .• ..,., ....• .....•• ..•'••••••.•••-•Fi-,:-,,.; I ' ..____.• .!:.'.h..•••;:.::::/.-..-,•-:0: 1••...4,,,,, :. -..0 A ...■...... .........■..■....■........, ... ..r ...,..?„.,-,..,,.....,,;.:..., : •-,••,!,.t4,....:.„. I . SKET'M :,.-;!.:',.':::.`..•'.."..;5..''•-`•. I 51./.....,•::",:;,'..:i;.1-=)%;,:::.::: ..?..-.‘...:•-•.', ,4:::-:' ,t-:-.,,,..,?.:,::'.:::::•:::••::;;:.....g.;:.:-. ., .,,,,,., 4-,4•z w::• •,..c,"):;;:'"?../j'.4:::;;:.::: 1::',.;.',..:,':"..7;:,::.:).••4•= •.- - J..: a7:-i' . • 1 ... .egi jtj .,:tA ... ,,,,,'•••■:/..r."...i.?:,:;'t-...' .,,..,.... .. :,.:.:::`',- '';'''''''''4 1::„.;;;,%■:,4!:3%,`;',',--"X'' , ,• ,.. .,,,,„;,;• !••,, ... ;.,:.',;•141-: '..:.;'' ''',',. I . -,•.,-,'1.'',4`..',..-„,' ‘.:,:'t'4•.••--.••-•.',.,,.7„;•,:,: . •.•,...,•:-',...t.''.:,',....,,„; • •'''.'''•'''..,4:s-:.1'1 :.,..:.11.,=,.. 1.-.4i;.i...,",:•: C--- -...7.:...;;;;•:.;.:;•-',•.,;,:-....-..1.1 :. "... " •;•4:-....,'; '1 ' -A;7:?:..`•::,.•:;......-::,.....,..4 i :'''.--',';:.;•';',, ':.' I ---- Ni3.4. ).....1, 4— \ IA N.... rots', • . ...*: Pk''-''` -%q•:141,:..:,,,:..Z:••••*' -1, 1 .. 1. . .:=-• `11,3.-•.'" • ,i-....,.: /i -•.0.-/-r;'*: ,:,.. /.-...;:•:,,,k.•,:-. : 4*(. / !...";i:: 7.:.,;,...-.:•',.•-,.,". —...,.;•'- •-• I . •''-:.t's;1-'•V' INSPECTOR DATE . — .-- • . •,..-",i'61.•ir',.,1-, • II , ,..",,:...,',:':-...i.;,';'..t.:, ,-.' I • •';!.V..,'1,',1,.!4..,:',41..::: '• -.. '-: ..i;1;;::.::. 50TE: AIlach supplemental test data heret] . ' ,:.4,r);, ..-' •• 1 . ts, •7 -%.'il'.- ' ; -',3',:';'.-....?...,-' . . . •. ,:?...1„S . • liv• ••:•:„•::::.,:-...:4-,-......,•,...',-.:-,...y.-•;;. '•' •: :,•`•:•.'?...1 • ,•-•-:.•••.f4.,:-,'::•,.*.:-;:',,r.', ^-.-.'•• -•••--- -- .,.. . ::':".;.)::..:)•,'..,;,•:::•.+e,'‘,:i....•:' , •. .. : ;:04.:i. . ..•:„••,-:••••,,,.:1::;:.;;;;•..1..')..: /...."4.f71".?::',:i....,,':=•3:::•',...., •' ,i,,:if a ":. ...s ':-:'./..7.'.5.?-'; • ‘ . ' • ''. ...•1,y',:,•-tl,''.....5-i.,;.:1--,. '4*4?-1: . . ,,,-.....:oit.../2,-.'::•;`,,---:", .' ' - ' -44--s; ,K•4•44•44:.;;;;,::... .....,_., . .. • ; ' .. . • . -• • • - .• . • -.7;•••',i,.7.,•''. -..“..•,',,, •-•..,t,.,`..,-. .... . • . _ `.... . . • .'' ".:. , ' •'';" ..".. •-:'..'...'••,7.'.r''.' ...'.....'.''."..,... '''.?..'•••:....',........1-.'j.°'..1'''F.`"fil.•':•-. .:10.;.7...•,:';4, ;••:.;••::iic.i:•.;,..:17.7%.......: ',1•1.. ,r'y, ..:•..:,"" .i:•: , '• ..t 11•,.‘ . . .. • . •• • . �����:• ��� iro TICOR TITLE lNSURAN ATUTORY WARRANTY DEED %` 1 ' i' RANCIS H. Van SCHOTEN and MARGARET Van SCHOTEN, as tenants by the entirety Grantor, conveys and warrants rat LAURI DEL HANSEN Grantee, the following described real property free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth i erein situated in WASHINGTON County, Oregon, to wit: EE 'LEGAL DESCRIPTION' ATTACHED HERETO AND BY REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. HIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION ;:a,wF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR $COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.0930. The said property is free from encumbrances except Regulations of the Unified Sewerage Agency; Waiver of Remonstrance; The true consideration for this conveyance is $286,000.00 (Here comply with the requirements of ORS 93.030) Dated this 7-0 day of June l9 95 FRANCIS H. Van SCHOTEN :�'•. OFFICIAL SEAL °�'%' KAREN P, SKYE k..iti . `/ to i NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON MARG• •ET Van SCHOTEN NO.036309 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.18 1998 State of Oregon, County of Was ing on State of Oregon, County of - The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me •} this 20 day of June _ 19 95 this day of , 19 by by President Fr. nr-t_s H.. Van Scho ten and Secretary of a ?ef, i,l _ V. — , — corporation, on behalf of the corp it, oration. Notary Public for Oregon My commission expires: ..---/g- / Notary Public for Oregon 15 My commission expires: • WARRANTY DEED This Space Reserved for Recorder' s Use GRANTOR: FRANCIS H. Van SCHOTEN ,."? = ?, WASHINGTON COUNTY GRANTEE: LAURI DEL HANSEN ;'�_ ?, REAL PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX ,c. _ ,,,_ ry It' 3 ago" • 00 (p .. -9 5 Until a change is requested, all tax statements shall be sent to the following address: `;�: a - FEE PAID DATE LAURI DEL HANSEN 9640 SW FREWING ST. TIGARD, OREGON 97223 - Escrow No. W632359KPS Title No.W632359RB After recording return to: LAURI DEL HANSEN 9640 SW FREWING ST. TIGARD, OREGON 97223 Ticor Title Insurance Company • • TICOR TITLE INSURANCE , EXHIBIT 'A' LEGAL DESCRIPTION A tract of land in Lot 25 of FREWING ORCHARD T CTS, my e tions2, Townshi State f, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, Oregon, beginning at an iron pipe on center line 40'OEa t ot 21 5 roway, and feet to antiron pipe Northwesterly corner of said Lot 25, and going t hence South 30° on the Southerly line of the roadway; thence continuing South 30° 11' East 143.70 feet along the Westerly line of aforesaid Lot 25 to an iron pipe; thence North 59° 56' East 194.40 feet to an iron East 20.0 a pipe on the Westerly line of Frewing Avenue;North 30° Ohfeet°tot he North asterly corner point on centerline; thence along centerline N h 30° 04 of aforementioned Lot 25 and on the center line Ash Street; thence on center line of Ash Street point of beginning. South 38° 25' West 231.0 feet to the true po • • • 3 Ticor Title Insurance Company • • . Zl` I CY i • 1, ,/•n' vv"r L ve \ \ 3. \ .„..."\ \ c'' \ T. i ,0a M' d° \\,..1 s / ,' /...„..„,, \ .\\,, , 1 • • 4 V.4 \ NC ■ f 4. 9 • 1 d'`l • K <i 4ry < ` 4 .N \ • • e t R r <• I I } 6 'V.. 11. • •• -•;'i .• , :- • . • •_ . . • A..-.,-...: . ..,,,,'.• •,. ,,....,. SEP.,..,.1.ft.-,.!.9p. 3.3:26 FR ioc — '- -;; - - • -- , ,_..,. .-.." f--,--:11'.`E tONCEPTS. 503 6'0'0189:T0. -'42103..--:-. ....'. ''•:%.. P:0 . ."-: •-•. ' b"hi-'--'44-•-•:•ti?'••..":-. 3.r-t.": '''""141 ti-1-134, :,- *-'71'"'-7"Lr.t...P•-:... .15--1- '13•-• -':: '.-1:Y. I.°:12,,---'1,-Lit=3-2, ,, . . *. r'.16.4.-'"c-1 ..: .. .. -L-IP" :":" - '. • - • •.. .••••• ••--, •.....-.••...• • ' . ;--:'. l';'7.-...j.i."r1::..,?;•-'":-.,..::::•,..."1"."::::._:4.::i::::.:::',:..E14,...".E.:7:...,:.:.....1:.:::tit...::::::,_:-.,,::.,-.:".:.:.",:.,::::-:r. . . . ...", ' - - - ,:._.„ .. . .. ::: , . .. - -.•., ._ .. . • • . . ..." . . • . •. . ,. • • ..•• ... - _..-. . . ... • . . , . , -- . ,,:-....-:,•,, ,..$:::.--F:-':!--e- ,. .-.,-Jizp-,.7 •-■!---.7-7-7-7-.77-,-\\ • . . , • , •, •.... . , . . • ' - -4-.....`.-f,'...:;::."--•:•'.:.-.-_:23:-..1-.3t..",-.,":`'.-i::::.,;;;:•.. . • .. _ ., . - . . . . . .. . • . • " - .. , .. - . . . •-• ' '- - - ' - - • - ., ,... „ _ • . • • . . • , . • . ._ ...... ...- -••• • 1 ,,,. ,, . .... 4.)- . . - . . \ . . _. .. . . 1 • \ \\.. .: . , . . ,.. • --.„-; -,. .• ,-. . . 1 / \ f • - 1 f I // c'' ' - \ \ \ . "i 1 \ ! 4 i I / / c'o, 4% / .....,..\ N • . I i / 7 47. / (--j( tn \ ...-(‘ \ 4) \ \ • i - ! • f ; ? . ' C5* 4/:11 /(i ••• • )0.\- 'r. V \ eSN \ 14w.• .4 - \Lb.‘0, / ..,,i.., \ i 1 /....,_ 1 /..:,. ;.. -1- • 4,- \ \ . I I • / e. . , --c, c5"- c9- ,. /•., '' ' o fr. ' .0, \\s'°- \ ;43 § g \ 1 i / / / \ I I / / / -q- z• --t) ‘, \ \ I / / Z -• ,, is, , 7 1 1 / \ • 1 / ,>. / 1 / s 1%:\ 1-.31.\ s, • I // C'3‘ \ N +N. '•, • .i : / , 4.ye X v 96 _ \. / \' / t-- 4)2i ,-1 \‘,'.`-. ‘ % '.6',.\ • - 4, --„, \ , \ %.„.„‘ \ • \ — .. -- ..., ' \ \ 111 •' i I / \• . ny.)' 3-. • - I li/ / VP . l!v, .,---,- ,--V. ; . I I • "'.; <-- NN... L. . : . : . .n.,-' . \ ....) \ \ 1. / Y .t r!: ' - , \ 1 1. 1 , -7-- ....,"‘ i 7,-.`4 NO \ \ / / Z ' , .. -, , "t\-pic . \ • i 1 \ , ‘ \x"-t* \ \ 1 ‘ 7. I' :, ,:...„,--,,--.,..1.,:z•-•::-..?•::---..-7.7:-.. ..••••:-...,„:7-..... 14. _ \ \ g I - -- . - / ...„," ,..., . . 1//' . *e6 . 1".. -.---,-- ,-\ '-, / • . \ 1 - ,-.\ _. . . .....,;,..2, \ I I 111:;'''''' . \ I • ,... _ c„, „,,--."-. ' N \ CY' 1\... \ 1 1 Acf/ \ , . I y \ \ ,V V." ,'''') "'- , \ ( \ \ , ..,,,, z -.Qv \ \ . 4,114741P' 1. , ,1 - ,f-ise j \ \ -,1 ' '‘.(..0 \ sir .,....,,,,,- \ i I \ \ N. ....--- ‘. \ \ ":/"./..s- -- \ j1.1 I i -‘/.1 --- ---- irc, \ ÷° \ 1 1 V \ it.- \ \ C7 ..)) \ \ 171 1. 1 \ C•'.r. • ._ , • \ . . \ iv I et,\\\ Alb ' 1-..'k „ I 't \\----") . ci co \' i ,,- :._,,: 1 \..) \ - \,- \ .::(IV:, . \ 1 -A 1 i .- c"--1-.',C, - i -')I- I c.T•.;\ Nde... -‘(T,..I) ' /7 \, \ ,,z0. "1 'A ' \ 1 t ":\:)._ ..-= . t .,..,..., , , • , • ,..5:5.3 - s_,....1) ,ii, L.,„.-- 9., \ ri 6 \ , \ 1 h 'c.:,-D' 1 ....---..-.. .....-■-.------...——.........--..--- 1 •_.,,--• t.J(' - - i . -0- '. '-'1,.. i,i \ N. 1 ( '—i TAX LOT 200, 1 SCALE DRAWING 2S 1W 2CD \ A4'. ° --- - 1 ks I.1.illit S.W. 1/4 SEC. 2.T.2S., R.1W., W.M. „) 1 1..r.t.6... . . ..... I _ I ,\ ill . . . • . . \-1 n 0 :: 457; r. g x"7"4 • I \ \ .... .c.j: WASHiNGTON COUNTY, OREGON ii.41 i . _.... \-. . 4. SEPTEMBER 13, 1999 cr-i terl in Con cep Ls 1. . - . i DRAWN BY: MSG • CHECKED BY WGP1 !4 1 • . • . -- - , 1 ::._,,,-,J-..::,..j..-i:.',7_,-..,:t.?,•,„:„:..-,:,.._,. SCALE l'---=30* ACCOUNT 150-3623 540 3?eld Drive ClocIsto.qe, Oregon 97027 h,4:\ONO\SONO-JACKBOND\BONOSC . :2.:-::-,:::.:!:::-"f-5-:: :'•:.:•:,-.: . ..:•:- • 1 • • • , . i , • . ...-,..:.,..,:-•...,.•-:•.f>_-:-../•::::::•:,:-..•-:-..2::-.4.:-.,..:-, ....•.---f.:7:::::::::.::::,•:;:.:-.-----%,-.':•-•---,-.:: • 1 . .. . - . . - • - • . . . . , . , . . . - . * TOTAL PAGE.03 • - . --,_ • • . - .. . • .....--.,. .-. •.- .?:-.'•:•• .-8:.ii--:-.-FI?:.=:-fr...':•-::..:1- ',. !:...*:.: .:::::::••:::::1:::3.,.:•:.;:,:;:::.:.,i.:,;.;.i..1:::::-.;.:1:,;.--:-•- • . • :4:-.3-:-.1:1-1.." ,1•,,:--::.;.zs-e•-:'.1.,:,..c.,::::,::::,:; , , .. ,:::_:..:.-:• ----.-:.:.•;::,:•:::::::-.---.-_,..--t--,•-:4,,,,•-•:•,.-:,,:::;-,;;,..? ,. _ . • • . . ,.. n . ,‘n, - - . .--•• - .-.. . -- - . . , .f,--:,-,...-:5-,.."-.4,--7,.::-!z:cf:,..:•:i:,..:.,.• .. .. I) . , • • - ' .. . -. . ” . .. •*"- -••-:- '0.-:?.',-;:c-':',:s .. ...,:,;:.?:;-,%:4.-: :.*::. 4: MLPI999OOO I WImPMWM CAAID \ 0 I ‘,,,, \ \ i , ' ... `,,, - /wE4,m v i - i ; \ - ' \ . t s,\ . , ,. _ \\.s....... . ___ _________._____._____.___ . . .. ______ -___ ..... .... ---_______._ _ - .....„___ __ _ ____ - 7 — .-' - 1 _ , \ /40/6 s ef p-/p-t-eei r( -r- \ • . , , 7 . , .,....-A..014.-• 4.1111••■■•■•■•••.0.4110.0■0.101■11.11111WOMI01 ,1%,., ,■ - _._- , 47",,, \ ' .""---- eve,'c LE. Pdraf ' „V - ______ _ _ *--------\\ \ \ i \ \ r ir Y.—) (-7-1') \,.. I PAaPeery -4.1.4/6- ,\ -iUtir \ 10/91.111aTs , 41 rE ,,,L'''ITI /I ,/ '---C-)1 \ A., I ' /- . \\ 11 %. / \ _ \ \ I \ \\ - \ ',/,/, i .'t 7 i ■ \ \ 0 I VE A y „.„ , 2 , \ . ., \ . \ „ .„. \\ \ .i.,,- .......„....____ ---- ,....c...5:, 1 , , \\ . , _ \ , i,....................r... ..........• ,-,- A LE, i \ ' ;,.. \ -- -\\- — -- ____ , \ ''.. \ ,.s..... VS\ \ \ \ - Q., "-- 1_.'., . „ . ) I . f,: r\'i,i) "-'-'" t i 946 Lf 0 ‘ ) \ N. \ - .____. \ fREw IN G , \ il t -Ry \ \ \ DEc-K -1 \----- t \ \ . . , . \ \ \ - ---\\_,,, , 1 Lii j \ \ ‘ \ '3' • 1 ‘,. -.9 I . \ S \ _ DR/I/EW \ \ ' <zQ / _ ,.. . . - -53, \ . 0 s ,,s-z, • 4,/,,,,,,;‘,,,,,,,,,,._ i ,, • \_ '' -a Y._`"'11 47 411% \ t -,Z 0 e/vE um 1 ._ • ......, 1 f L., sal \ I CfiX foR r _ ....., , -* . \\\\ (A \ „ _ \ A - \ ,. et J._ ......_\ _.... x \ \ . _ ____ ___. _ _____ — ' ,, CC6N '; \ \\ \ --- )T---c-f-i,--:F- --- > . ' PARI- /A16" ,,, \ . \ \ --.. .- \,, \ fil \ Cl \J- 1 ....---. , , , . s \13 \LN \ \ ‘ V '..\ Oat ‘. \ N--- \ 1 ‘ . , sti \ \ Ar —.10 I ), 1 . ‘ ' \ ..t.) bi h v6.. *,,,,-_-,...„...............„ oi s ,eu, 45 \ \ \ 1 3c 1 6 S (.,i-N „ ‘ \ \ ---4 v, Li"\ N.:. ‘1' \ C. irs'sb. t \ \ \ L------- ----- , .._. ----st,. ■ \ \ „ I \ \ \ ----..---- 5 \ \ W A 7-Er- \, \ \ \ \ \ ,.,0 \ \ \ \ . \ , . \ ‘ \ \ \ „ \ , . \ _ , \ ; , ',. .,,,,,_ t \ \ \ \ , \\ \ \ \\ M i \ \ \ \ \--*---- ti„ ./ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4 \ \ , \ '-0 \ . _ - -k \ \ \ \ , .....,„ \ tx5 ---„,, \ ‘ t. _ 5 CA LE . \ \ 'NN - \ -).- , .1 1 . N,. v • \ 7.,_ zo -... , ,h. .......: \--,., r- - \ \ "' \ \ \ \ ..,. 'ck7/ %\\ \ \ _ \ \ \ \ . . , \ .. \ \\ . , \ , \ \ \\\\\ \\.\\ .- . \ \ t. \ \ , \ ,......._ - \\ \ \ \ \ \ N , \ \ . \\ \ \ ' • . ' .--, St \ \ , . \ \ \ \\ \ .., \, _ • ,"-- , , , .. / \..._ _ __ , \ , \ • • RECEIVED PLANNING 56 5 ) �5�� `Z/ �g 920 S. W. STEPHENSON COURT SEP 06 2000 PORTLAND, OREGON 97219 CITY OF TIGARD 2 September 2000 Mathew Scheidegger Assistant Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard OR 97223 REILMLP 1999-00016 Land Use File Attached are requirements indicated to Ms Aldridge that were needed to complete the application as specified in your letter Feb 3, 2000. Also attached are deed' recordings indicating the ownership of the property has revdrted to Jack H. Bond, Turstee for the Bond Trust and Hassell Trust. A power-of-attirney has been executed by the Aldridges so that the petition can be continued. Mr. Bond will be out-of-country for 3 weeks. Please process and move this matter to completion during this time, if possible. 4,0, you. • H. Bond FORM No.15—POWER OF ATTORNEY. COPYRIGHO STEVENS-NESS LAW PUBLISHING CO..PORTLAND,OR 97204 NN '` POWER OF ATTORNEY I ' SPACE RESERVED �, To r j �A FOR ei_d JI _/�/�� r 1`P/ 6G!/4 RECORDER'S USE After recording,return to(Name,Address,Zip): I , { KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS that I/we, Lauri Del Hansen Aldridge and/or David Aldridge have made, constituted and appointed and by these presents do make, constitute and appoint Jack H. Bond or his assignee, my true i and lawful attorney, for me and in my name, place and stead in any action, interest, or proceeding by the City of Tigard, !County of Washington, Centerline Engineering, or any previous appraiser or lender, in regard to property address of 9640 S.W. Frewing and/or 13510 Ash Avenue, Tigard Oregon,to continue, follow, administer, consummate and complete the partition application currently before the Commission and/or any debt obligations or liens currently on the property. I hereby give and grant unto my attorney the full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing 9� 9 Y Y P Y P rY 9 'whatsoever requisite and necessary to be done, as fully, to all intents and purposes, as I might or could do if personally present, hereby ratifying and confirming all that my attorney lawfully does or causes to be done by virtue thereof. In construing this instrument, and where the context so requires, the singular includes the plural. Dated anuary 15, 2000. 4. Ag/*, Lauri gel Hansel Aldridge aech,y David Aldridge STATE OF OREGON,County of j-,��✓ h *0✓� ) ss. p This instrument was acknowledged before me on 1__.Z o by ; rr?d ; OFFICIAL SEAL 't MICHAEL WAGNER NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON Notary Public for 0 on COMMISSION NO. 329062 My commission expires /1J9 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOVEMBER 14,2003 FORM No.240-ESTOPPEL DEED-MORTGAGE OR TRUST DEED(in lieu of foreclosure)(Individual or Corporate). ©1999 STEVENS-NESS LAW PUBLISHING CO..PORTLAND,OR 97204 I NN if) prfe—pia7/4„ STA.F OREGON 1 k S' County of Washington } SS Lauri Del Hansen Aldridge 9640 SW Frewing I, Jerry ! _— --- --- _ ____ . cli� TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the second party and second party's heirs, successors and assigns forever. And the first party,for first party and first party's heirs and legal representatives,does covenant to and with the second party and second party's heirs,successors and assigns, that the first party is lawfully seized in fee simple of the property, free and clear of encumbrances except the mortgage or trust deed and not otherwise except(if none,so state) . y -1-a-te--f-ee-s--advanced_incauded__in_.recent first mortgage payments ad_vancesl— that the first party will warrant and forever defend the above granted premises, and'every part and parcel thereof against the lawful claims and demands of all persons whomsoever, other than the liens above expressly excepted; that this deed is intended as a con- veyance, absolute in legal effect as well as in form, of the title to the premises to the second party and all redemption rights which the first party may have therein, and not as a mortgage, trust deed or security of any kind; that possession of the premises hereby is surrendered and delivered to the second party; that in executing this deed the first party is not acting under any misapprehension as to the effect thereof or under any duress,undue influence,or misrepresentation by the second party,or second party's representatives, agents or attorneys; that this deed is not given as a preference over other creditors of the first party, and that at this time there is no person, partnership or corporation,other than the second party, interested in the premises directly or indirectly, in any manner what- soever, except as set forth above. In construing this instrument, it is understood and agreed that the first party as well-as the second party may be more than one person; that if the context so requires the singular includes the pluial,'and that all grammatical changes shall be made, assumed and implied to make the provisions hereof apply equally to corporations and to individuals. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the first party has executed this instrument. If first party is a corporation, it has caused its name to be signed and its seal, if any, affixed by an officer or other person duly authorized to do so by order of its board of directors. DATED ___2&--December---a 9-- . THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN , _ • THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGU- LATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPRO- __.___-_ PRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES. . ; AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. STATE OF OREGON, County of ____Waas h ing-ton=.---------------)ss. This instrument was acknowledged before me on ___2 g:,_December--49 9-9--------•---------> • by �a Der -H-anse-n Ad� dge This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____-._-.------.___--_.---•.-- ----._.. .___-.-_.- .___-> by as of OFFICIAL Sc�L _ :.LJ ral7 B MICHAEL DES CAMP I\1( ary Public for Oregon y'. r. NOTARY PUBLIC-ORCLUN My commission expires _.I -2)0._V_._'Q ;>/ COMMISSION NO.319877 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JANUARY 20,200J FORM No.240-ESTOPPEL DEED-MOR I-GAGE OR TRUST DEED(In lieu of foreclosure)(individual or Corporate). ©1999 STEVENS-NESS LAW PUBUSHING CO.,PORTLAND,OR 97204 • `p IIN — — 4,2y /949y-4a46 STAT F OREGON • Lauri Del Hansen Aldridge_. s County of Washington } SS 9640 SW Frewing/ I, Jerry of Assess- ment and r'. r= ft,'o County G Tigard oR__sZZ Name n Address for First Party's Name and Address , rtlfy that Jean Hassell Family Tro t_-. rt the wit • r;y(,� . ao : t �,.• `g,,eceived 920 SW Stephenson :Court a and re. `r�.::� ` sJ .f said Portland OR 97219 b county �� Second Party's Name and Address a ti�'�nxa't`'" `** SPACE RESERVED * After recording,return to(Name,Address,Zip): FOR �` * RECORDER'S USE \* ** '1>i. "• *ans,1 D'rector of 924__S_W _B tephenson__Co.urt V sb f' . 'a ation, Ex- Rat tl a r..1__QRZ c Until requested otherwise,send all tax statements to(Name,Address,Zip): - DO C : 2 0 00 0 4 9 2 3 5 Rect: 257135 -27,00 Jerrie__Jean__A___Bond,__Trus-tee 06/21/2000 10:50: 55am 9.2-0__S_W__S teph.ens.on_._Co.ur-t P9rtland__OR_.912.1_9 ESTOPPEL DEED MORTGAGE OR TRUST DEED • THIS INDENTURE between Lauri__De.l_-Hansen-Aldridge- hereinafter called the first party, and _Jean Hasse- --T-r-ust,--Jerrie--Jean--Hassel l--Bond-r--T-r-u-stee hereinafter called the second party; WITNESSETH: Whereas, the title to the real property hereinafter described is vested in fee simple in the first party, subject to the lien of a mortgage or trust deed recorded in the Records of the county hereinafter named, in book/reel/volume No. ___not _. on page • recorded-, and/or as fee/file/instrument/microfilm/reception No. .__ (indicate which), reference to those Records hereby being made, and the notes and indebtedness secured by the mortgage or trust deed are now owned by the second party, on which notes and indebtedness there is now owing and unpaid the sum of$ ,the same being now in default and the mortgage or trust deed being now subject to immediate foreclosure; and whereas the first party, being unable to pay the same, has requested the second party to accept an absolute deed of conveyance of the property in satisfaction of the indebtedness secured by the mortgage or trust deed, and the second party does now accede to that request; NOW,THEREFORE, for the consideration hereinafter stated(which includes the cancellation of the notes and the indebted- ness secured by the mortgage or trust deed and the surrender thereof marked "Paid in Full"to the first party), the first party does hereby grant,bargain,sell and convey unto the second party and to second party's heirs,successors and assigns, all of the following described real property, with the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in any way appertaining, situ- ated in Washington County,State of Oregon , to-wit: A tract of land in Lot 25 of FREWING ORCHARD TRACTS, in Section 2, Township 2 South, RAnge 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, beginning at an iron pipe on the center line of Ash Street, a 40. 0 foot roadway, and at the Northwesterly corner of the said Lot 25, and going thence South 30° 11 ' East 21 . 55 feet to an iron pipe on the Southerly line of the roadway, thence continuing Sou h 30° 11 ' East 143 . 70 feet along the Westerly line of aforesaid Lot 25 to an iron pipe; thence North 590 56 ' East 194. 40 feet to an iron pipe on the Westerly line line of Frewing Avenue; thence continuing North 30° 04 ' West 250 . 0 feet to the Northeasterly corner of aforementioned Lot 25 and on centerline of Ash Street; thence on center line of Ash Street South 38° 25 ' (: - West 231 . 0 feet to the true point of beginning. The true and actual consideration for this conveyance is$43.6_r-0.00. . (Here comply with ORS 93.030.) II (OVER) _YW '10 1-IAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the second party and second party's heirs,successors and assigns forever. And the first party, for first party and first party's heirs and legal representatives,does covenant to and with the second party and second party's heirs,successors and assigns, that the first party is lawfully seized in fee simple of the property, free and clear of encumbrances except the mortgage or trust deed and not otherwise except(if none,so state) NONE that the first party will warrant and forever defend the above granted premises, and every part and parcel thereof against the lawful claims and demands of all persons whomsoever, other than the liens above expressly excepted; that this deed is intended as a con- veyance, absolute in legal effect as well as in form, of the title to the premises to the second party and all redemption rights which the first party may have therein, and not as a mortgage, trust deed or security of any kind; that possession of the premises hereby is surrendered and delivered to the second party; that in executing this deed the first party is not acting under any misapprehension as to the effect thereof or under any duress,undue influence,or misrepresentation by the second party,or second party's representatives, agents or attorneys; that this deed is not given as a preference over other creditors of the first party, and that at this time there is no person, partnership or corporation, other than the second party, interested in the premises directly or indirectly, in any manner what- soever, except as set forth above. In construing this instniment, it is understood and agreed that the first party as well as the second party may be more than i one person; that if the context so requires the singular includes the plural, and that all grammatical changes shall be made, assumed and implied to make the provisions hereof apply equally to corporations and to individuals. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the first party has executed this instrument. If first party is a corporation, it has caused its name to be signed and its seal, if any, affixed by an officer or other person duly authorized to do so by order of its board of directors. DATED -2-8--December----1-9-9-9 - THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED �C� G '�r� THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND RF i=- j LATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPRO- PRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES. I AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST • iI PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. I I� STATE OF OREGON, County of .Washington------- )ss. �I This instrument was acknowledged before me on .__.2.8-_D.ec-embex---a- -99----- , II by --Lau:r-_i----Del--Hansen---A1d-r dqe (Lau i Hat��ee) 'Phis instrument was acknowledged before me on .._.. , by as of • ' �, OFFICIAL SEA! o ary Public for Oregon '' :x ti CAMP DES CA • It a My commission expires NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION Mr..31987 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JANUARY 20.2003 • I - - ---- - - -- - - -i • • September 15, 2000 Jack Bond 920 SW Stephenson Court Portland, OR 97219 RE: Notice of Incomplete Application Submittal — MLP1999-00016 Dear Mr. Bond: The City has received your application to partition 1 lot into 2. After a review of your submittal items, staff has deemed your application submittal as incomplete. In order for staff to proceed, the following materials will need to be submitted: Please submit "to scale" drawings showing the following: • Proposed 25-foot right-of-way on SW Frewing Street. • Proposed property lines, setbacks, etc. drawn "to scale", (structures to property lines, include carport, etc.) Also, show existing trees and landscaping. • Existing and proposed access. Old plans submitted show the circular driveway to t cross-over the proposed property line. The plan submitted on September 6th, 2000 does not show the driveway or the property lines. • Fourteen (14) copies of the revised narrative and plans. Only one copy of the narrative has been submitted. Also, I will need the additional copies of the site plan. • Request 500-foot property owner mailing list. Mailing lists are only good for three months. I have included a request form with this letter. Once the required information has been submitted, staff can deem the application complete and begin the review process. An application is reviewed for compliance with all standards in effect at the time the application is deemed complete. If you have any questions regarding your application or if I can answer any other questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at (503) 639-4171, x317. Sincerely, Mathew Scheidegger Assistant Planner i:\curpin\mathew\m1p1999-00016.acc.acc4.doc c: MLP1999-00016 Land use file • CITIr OF TIGARD February 3, 2000 OREGON -Lauri Aldridge 9640 SW Frewing Street Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Notice of Incomplete Submittal — MLP1999-00016 Dear Ms. Aldridge: The City has received your application to partition 1 lot into 2. After a review of your submittal, staff has deemed your application submittal as incomplete. In order for staff to proceed, the following materials will need to be submitted: Submit, to scale drawing showing: • Proposed 25-foot right of way on Frewing Street. • Proposed 30-foot Radius, right of way on the corner of Ash Avenue and Frewing Street. • Average lot afor Duplex lot. j2 3•�p - coll r Once the required information has been submitted, staff can deem the application complete and begin the review process. An application is reviewed for compliance with all standards in effect at the time the application is deemed complete. If you have any questions regarding your application or if I can answer any other questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x317. Sincerely, Mathew Scheidegger Assistant Planner • i:\curpin\mathew\m1p1999-00016.acc.acc3.doc c: MLP1999-00016 Land Use File 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 1 0 We propose to partition tax map#2S1 02 CD-200, comprising.8 acre, on the corner of Frewing Street and Ash Avenue, into two parcels. The purpose for the partiton is to convert the combined house and duplex from "non-standard"classification in financing which requires us to pay exhorbitant interest rates on a mortgage. A mortgage may be obtained at standard rates on a house and duplex seperately. Parcel No. 1 is the lot upon which our house at 9640 SW Frewing Street is situated, and would be fairly --- - - square with 15,252 square feet. The house contains 2300 sq ft on the main floor, 816 square feet in the basement, and an upstairs rented apartment of 816 sq ft. The setbacks as shown on the survey are 38.7 feet in the front, 59.4 feet on the left side, 15 feet in the rear, and on the right side 11 feet from the house, and 5 feet from the carport. Parcel No. 2 is the lot containing a two-family residential duplex with the address of 13150 SW Ash Avenue, of 19,113 square feet. The duplex contains 1432 sq ft on the main floor,consisting of a 960 sq ft apartment and 472 sq ft in a foyer area and common laundry/utility room. The upstairs is a 1104 sq ft apartment. The basement contains a 1104 sq ft garage and workshop. A 3-car garage of 720 sq ft adjoins the duplex on the basement street level. According to all records available in Hillsboro,both the house and the duplex were built in 1925. In the property tax area of the Public Services building in Hillsboro,we found where a county adjuster or appraiser indicated that both the house on Frewing and the duplex on Ash Ave. were in the same or similar condition as other property built in 1950(having an effective age of 1950), and should be taxed on that basis. (See Exhibit#1). All records we could find including PG&E and etc. indicates the house and duplex were built at the same time, in 1925. This was confirmed by the 2nd owners of the property(Frank and Margaret Van Scholten)at the time I bought it. They had purchased the property from the original owners and builders. Please see Map#1 for location of trees and bushes with a circumference of six inches or more. this map included the proposed property division lines and the square footage of the properties involved. We are requesting a variance for the duplex lot, as I understand the width of the lot is less than a normal duplex in one part. Parking: Parcel 1 has an asphalt paved circular driveway in front capable of parking up to six vehicles, and a two-car carport on the right side. Parcel 2 shall grant an easement to Parcel 1 allowing access to that carport. Parcel 2 has 4 single-car garages, and an asphalt paved parking pad providing parking for 3 vehicles in addition to the driveway leading to that pad, ,.....„.7sj Sincerely, J _, °A 1/ 0 s December 17, 1999 Lauri Aldridge 9640 SW Frewing Street Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Notice of Incomplete Submittal — MLP1999-00016 Dear Ms. Aldridge: TREE PLAN OK The City has received your application to partition 1 lot into 2. After a review of your submittal, staff has deemed your application submittal as incomplete. In order for staff to proceed, the following materials will need to be submitted: • Tree plan from certified Arborist showing all tree sizes, types and locations. • Fourteen (14) additional copies of the narrative. Only one copy was submitted. • Clarify carport setbacks. The site plan does not show setbacks of the carport in relation to the proposed property lines. • Address the square footage of the two dwelling units on the 15,000 square foot lot. By addressing the square footage of the dwelling units, staff will be able to determine the structures intended purpose. • Site plan showing a two-lot partition instead of the potential three lots. The site plan is confusing; staff finds it difficult to distinguish proposed lot lines. • Show all proposed setbacks on the site plan. Staff will need to reflect compliance with setback requirements in the decision in order to approve this request. • Impact study. As part of the application submittal requirements, applicants are • required to include an impact study with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks, water and sewer systems, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities system, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence, which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. • Address access/egress standards for the proposed circle driveway. The circular driveway will cross over the proposed property line. Therefore, an access easement will be required. • • • Complete the land use application form for the Variance, which was also requested, and pay the associate review fee (in this case, 20% of the standard • fee due to filing a joint application). Also, address the Variance criteria for the width of a duplex in the revised narrative. A request for a Variance was included in the narrative, however, the items indicated above have not been addressed. • Address parking standards. Parking for the duplex and for the other dwelling unit will need to be addressed as well in the narrative. Once the required information has been submitted, staff can deem the application complete and begin the review process. An application is reviewed for compliance with all standards in effect at the time the application is deemed complete. If you have any questions regarding your application or if I can answer any other questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x317. Sincerely, Mathew Scheidegger Assistant Planner i:\curpin\mathew\m1p1999-00016 c: MLP1999-00016 Land Use File Lauri Aldridge W Q C7A 9640 SW Frewing Street v ofe Tigard, OR 97223 4 (503)639 -2340 or 620 - 3370 _ November 23, 1999 Tigard City Building and Planning v'° Attention: Julia Hajduk 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Julia, P 1 We propose to partition tax map# 2S1 02 CD- 200, comprising.8 acre,into two parcels. Parcel No. 1 is the lot upon which-our wing-Street-is-situated—Parcel No. 2 contains a duplex and vacant lot on the corner of Frewing Street and Ash Ave. This would leave the potential for future partition of the duplex and lot at such time the project became financially meritorious or feasible. The setback lines would be 10 feet on the side of the house which contains no exit doors (designated side yard), 59.4 ft. at the rear of the house which contains two backdoors (East of the house), 12 feet setback from the house on the Ash Ave side, this includes 5 feet setback from the carport, 38.7 ft. at the front of the dwelling. This would make the lot for the house fairly squared off with a 15,188 total square foot lot. It would leave the other lot an L shape with a total of 18,987 square feet. However,this lot could be easily divided at a later time with 10,174 footage for the duplex and 8,400 footage for the new lot to be developed, plenty of land for a single family house. There would be an easement granted to the Frewing St. Parcel for access to the carport from Ash Ave. According to all records we were able to look up at the county offices in Hillsboro, both the house and the duplex were built in 1925 as we have previously discussed. In the Property Tax area of the Public Service building in Hillsboro, we found where some adjuster, or appraiser indicated that both the house on Frewing and the duplex on Ash Ave. were in the same or similar condition (effective age)as other property built prior to 1950, and should be taxed on that basis. (See Exhibit#1). On the Washington County Tax rolls both the house and the duplex are listed as being built in 1925, with the correct living areas for both(See Exhibit#2). Exhibit#3 is the sewer permit for the duplex which simply claims the existing structure to have been built prior to 7-1-70, why it didn't require anything more clear or accurate, I don't know. Everything we could find, any type of records,PG&E and etc. everything dates with the house as far as When the duplex was built. Accourding to the Washington County Property Tax records office, and the Assessors Office prior to 1959-1960 there were no building codes in Washington County. When I purchased the property, I was told by the 2°d owners of the property(Frank and Margaret a . Van Scholten)that the house and the duplex were built at the same time,both in 1925. Since they had purchased the property from the original owners and builders,I believe this to be stronger than just hearsay,this is what they were told when they purchased the property. I have never seen or known of any document that in anyway indicates other than the duplex being constructed at the same time as the house. When we remodeled, we found old newspapers_ underneath blown in fiber insulation that was added to ceilings. The newspapers were dated in the 1940's, during World War II. We still have some of these papers and didn't remove all of them if they are needed to validate the time frame that the duplex had been remodeled prior to our remodeling effort. Since the 1940's and prior to 1950 is before there were either Tigard City or Washington County codes,the duplex then was first built and then remodeled the first time prior to building codes. When the Van Scholtens owned the property,they rented the basement of the house, the upstairs apartment in the house, lived in the main portion of the house and rented both dwellings in the duplex. Since leasing the property in 1993 and owning it in 1995, we have used the basement as a part of the house, making the property comprised of 4 dwelling units rather than the previous 5. Since code is listed as R 4.5,this has been within the city regulations. When we divide off the house, it is my understanding that at that time the basement could be a legal apartment again. The duplex has only the two dwelling units, it does also include a workshop and laundry areas, but these are not dwelling units. Please see Map#1 for location of trees and bushes with a circumference of six inches or more. This map includes the proposed property division lines,the square footage of the properties involved, and the curve in the road that Tigard City suggested we add in order to give the street clearance to the duplex. (The curve in the road could also benefit the neighborhood by slowing down traffic). We request a variance for the duplex lot, as the width of the lot is less than a normal duplex. Since the building already exists, and there is the amount of square footage for a duplex,just not the width, we would ask for a variance for the duplex. We understand that if anything were to happen to the duplex that would require it to be rebuilt,that it could not be built where it now stands, it would have to be moved further back. Sincerely, / v Lauri Del Aldridge • • FOR WEB SITE: SO YOU RECEIVED A LAND USE NOTICE. WHAT IS NEXT? NEIGHBORHOOD MEETIA For many land use decisions the City of Tigard requires applicants to hold a Neighborhood Meeting prior to making a formal land use application. The purpose of the meeting is to allow the prospective developer to share with you what they hope to do. Notice is sent to property owners within 500 feet of the developer's property. This is an opportunity for you to become informed of the development and to let the developer know what issues or concerns you have. After the neighborhood meeting, the developer can submit his plans. Since site design frequently occurs after the neighborhood meeting, plans submitted to the City may vary from that presented at the neighborhood meeting. Changes may include suggestions made at the neighborhood meeting, but the developer is obligated only to submit what meeting City code criteria. Neighborhood meetings are required for the following land use applications: Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Zone Changes, Subdivisions, some Sensitive Lands, Conditional Uses and Site Development Reviews. On other applications such as Minor Partitions, Variances, and Home Occupation Type II, staff will send out notice to properties within 500 feet of the subject property and request comments. These comments will be responded to in a staff decision according to development ordinance criteria. WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? The developer finalizes their submittal package and submits an application. Sometimes it takes a while to prepare all the necessary plans so there could be several months between the neighborhood meeting and the submittal of the application. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL Once an application is submitted to the City, staff will review it for completeness. This may take up to 30 days. Once an application is deemed complete, the formal review process begins. APPLICATION REVIEW It usually takes 6-8 weeks from the time an application is accepted for a decision to be written. Planned Developments, Conditional Uses, Zone Changes and Comprehensive Plan Amendments • ` . • require public hearing. For public hearings a notice is sent to property owners within 500 feet of the subject property. These notices invite citizens to testify at the hearing. Subdivisions and Site Development Reviews are staff decisions. Property owners within 500 feet are notified. Citizens are requested to submit comments regarding the prospective proposal. It is important to note that all comments or testimony must be directed to the relevant development ordinance criteria according to state law. The criteria are listed in the notices and the decisions. The law requires the City to make decisions based on the criteria. Decisions cannot be made to deny projects because neighbors or citizens are not happy with a development. It is important for citizens to review the development code and familiarize themselves with what is or is not permitted. Staff is available to help answer questions. Planning technicians are available at the development counter and Planners are available by phone or appointment. DECISION Within five days of a decision by staff or the public hearing body, notice of the decision will be sent to property owners within 500 feet as well as the applicant. The written decision will spell out how the application meets or does not meet the development ordinance criteria. Decisions are normally subject to numerous conditions of approval to ensure the ordinance criteria are met. APPEALS Decisions of the staff can be appealed to the City Hearings Officer. Decisions of the Hearings Officer or Planning Commission that originate from those decision makers can be appealed to the City Council. Appeals must be filed within 10 business days of when the Notice of Decision was mailed. Once again, the decision by the appeals body must be based on the criteria of the development code. GENERAL While the land use process can be complex and legalistic as well as frustrating sometimes, staff can provide helpful information. General questions typifying neighborhood concerns have been drafted by the Citizen Involvement Team to aid citizens in their review of development proposals. I:curpin\dick\landpro.web iy • • Lauri Aldridge 9640 SW Frewing Street Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 620-3370 or(503) 639-2340 June 3, 1999 "Tigard City Building and Planning RE: Map and Tax Lot -#2S 1 02 CD, 200 I would like to subdivide the property located at 9640 SW Frewing Street, Tigard, OR, into 3 lots. Currently there is a large house that faces Frewing Street and the address is 9640 SW Frewing Street. There is also a large duplex unit that faces Ash Ave., the address there is 13510 SW Ash Ave. I would like to divide off the corner lot and build a duplex on it. Tigard City was going to take 10 feet on each side of Ash Ave., for the purposes of widening the street. The neighborhood voted this action down since they were concerned. about the street traffic. Since then, Tigard City has decided to take 5 feet on each side hf the street for sidewalks. Since the East side of Ash Ave. is developed property and affects at least three property owners, I would like to propose that Tigard City take the original 10 feet on the West side of Asir Ave. as previously decided and not any on the East side. • The reasons are: First, this decision would allow for sidewalks and proper setbacks from existing structures. Second, this decision would create a bend or curve in the road that would help slow down traffic, a major neighborhood concern. Third, the West side of the street is mainly undeveloped property and this decision would not affect the value of the undeveloped or developed area or hurt the overall property in its current or future value. • Sincerely, Lauri Del Aldridge • CI NI.. ...1.,.......,:i,....•.: ..R.' - .4.... • . „;:::. •.•-,..• ... ,..-)., it . .....- :::.. . •,..F.,..:.,,,,,i,.0- - §.•-•;•••:,:.,:.:.*..11..:.i.:.:..:.:. .,...•.•..!!.4..,...:a...,•• ......• ........,.„:,, ...- n. •.,. ,•:. -7 •....71,,,i,.....• . 4 1:::::::".. ••••• . • ... . . .,,....„ .N.filw.)f.•;‘,.,,_. '...i', .. .*#. .. ?,..:;,, • '• . . ....::.:::.,...,:.:..,6, • 41.0....,.." •..'..:••:,:***::•-..-......: ••••!. .• : .. ' .T.:10.. r' .." • ' .:::'•:i.....4.::'. •••••• . , ..,• .. .. •:,.•r. :. . ,.,... •4 ,,.....• . ..,..:,:::::,.. : ...•, •!,,i,...••,!,.• ••,,,,,..,•,,,...... ,...,,,', •• """,.:•''''..'••'" . •',....'; ." .•• ,,•.• •:.. ,. ,;,i ....Li'.: • • .1,.:' •,..., ..• ,:g. 7,, .40"r IP!.•,.,',1,i1:•,4,....' 1 4, ,` • • ;•'•••. ' '•:F.■;::1! .i.'',1'.ii.: ' • ...er. • .....,,,:',,...?' ..•7 .,:l. ... 11%-;::...04 ' .•'....ir....7.: .- .- :.• .,,.. • • ...:.:•;: . :,.?.. ::•:: ........).7.'17.••••4,'•::••• ': .••■•'.i,...4. !•t, .:.'• 4 0.....mt.• ': • . • ..10.. 'i.i.'''g: . .. . :C..... .1.-:•...",....J.:ffi'".;,;.•.. • ,"„ .,:... ...• :..'1..,**....E. • ....... ... ,: .:'".• ..:'... . , . .... • .....:.. ' ..•''..1::.:4.1::: :•'••. 401A''''.. • ' )r.,•:-. ..C.r...'<., • • ,, • .. . . . ,,, ._, . .. •■ .. ..... .' ti.:••. . .,. * '•i ....0.$;;;'','er. * :....., '.1':.,„,'...' -''...... !,• i......'',....41 4.•'. '" •• ...••• •410. .• ;:*',...•:'....: . Ir4 .. . ... .. . . ''' A.i. •IP 1 .-.... ..,,, ••••1 Preit,• • '.'' • ••: "••••• " .. 'lir "• •••:•trk:::4•^***:'''', ,,,•;,..t.Z:;.• •41 i.„ .F. op.:::::17,,,'.• .•- • .:: : 44 • '''-' • • " ••• iter.. 414: • - •;:;;:liov:• . '.. '4141:4:... oirlit.. .:11 •jii.::.•N) ...-..''., :...!.'.!'•-"qi• it. . .. .,e''''.....-. '......-.7 • k•S ,,,.4. ...;, . 4 :"...:..,...;,..,7,...4` ...•:4.1.•-•....••,' • 6,,.:' ..• :. :::;..::...t6... .^:.....i.,... .:: •lii . N ':•''•'4''' IL .. ,:-....,. .• -1:: :"!,.....::-• • •• ..,....!..a!„.1.0:%._..,....,:k:: fr.....,.. •.• IiiiErt :••• 4 ,,iii. •,), ...44:. . •• "::77 •• • ...i.• ) :•• ... ..44610..•. • il"t<... :'i:4:'..')‘1... ...• • ..•••' - •• • ... ••:''' ...,A4.4 .4 : '..' ': .... ' .:..• • :...0e#. ".:figt:, . . .. „ '.......i.:. ...:Ki.?•4...••.... .,* ,...•.,.•••••••• .• . • c ir;7..:::.-•.? , .:. ..,. '.....:1!..• :11'.• ::.411'• .:, ,;.• I . .,......• • • • ..:'. .• •...•-''''..;•••. ilt..•::....1:::::: ......•- • •: .• ... • . . ...•• eik:•!.i‘• 40.'..• ::. •••-r.': . :''..;4.....:, • :. :":'....::::''''.!.:E::..:., • .•. ..••:... '...•:•....,-...... .:..A• • :•:: ._ ,..,..:-.5',i• ........*x; :.'..:.. •.... •-•••• A::... F.'.. .'i••!:. •: . s • .-....• • •••••: : 4.• ..1*,....?t1:::::.•:!! " .':.••••4...i#4 • r . .°"•: • ••?-•••••' '...'..•... ".■4.4...!::: :••ii:.&4711.,gn:!:tgr'L-:.•• . ....,:.11.r••••''•••• ':'..;iii,r.r.:;:••••,.:: r,' n'.. .-: „. •• ...::..•:.*"••••!..,4:.• •r ".:, • ::"i•lAti.lcii:i.T! ,oC• .4'4:::••...• •:11%,„ :537,. ...,:„.. ...••..„1....... .. , • . ..;,;•;. •,•1.,,, ....:. .. ... ... ,,.- ..,:.$, •'. ■--':,ik .. Jt, :41E70: .....,..,:,:„,...0.,-;.,•;:.' „ . • . :• ...,. ....•- •••• -, •:.".E''.. ,'47' • .s.; ;7: •:•* , : . : ••.?,;. • .• . .4.1kr.i.':......• • --*-•--. ■."•'''•"::.:'''• • • ••• '•••:::•••••:••‘•''''- . " •' ''' . ,., • •''• .•.:.'....,7'....• • ,...•.: • ..,....: ..:.: *f ; .. • • • ..1 ...:I ..... •AW.S. • "•••;,.•*,',..■,-'-'•:.;7-.: • • ,'.......' 441!.•••'...:**•%.... ... . .• . • .:!.::-''' :: ....j.,.- ••..-•...!...,,-.... ' .,.: LLK'T'.. • '..'``,/ • .. '••• ,,. ..,..... :!I••■•'•:4:$4:,`:'!114'4, . • ,.....?..........F..:•• . !. .. 41 ' :• ..,;.* ji : .. • ' .••'•••••*:. ' •• .S,..,,..* . • • .......!••••••1::*••••.:.. :..:' .. ''''''l•,:•,.1:::Iir•.:,:',..•: • . . • •41'.'"*.ie.;,;,.. '-,.1,s':.i'.•:''. ......,'''''t,nr,.;:::,:',,,,,:'!„,;,,,,A ..121e1: • ..* .••'-:.0:•P':i•i'i'l '•••,'. :. 1.§41:f11411' '•••'..,:'ll'•;:i,•'','',.: .....::. 410''' '•::.. ' -.: #%' ., •illi '14.1.0!!••:7':•,..:',,..;•-::,•;•.•''.•S...+.1•:''''''',,-,...;',i„■ ...• . .. .. ,: ••.. . ?. .:.I. :.4'':.4.:• • , . . r.444: F.:1!.,.11i .•:' t'\.....,;•••;:.i.''.;.-,., .... , . ... . -.•... ,,... • .. 4 . .,,. •. ;14.1.144.1.....:.. . ...:. - ,.. , 14. ... "P • 3,•::.'FNES.,:. ''....... :I:if]ii.!.• •;•i!:•••• •-,: ; •....,•::i'1.14::::;',111!..i.. .• ,•, •'''• .• ,,,,011V.i...;:tio.•:' fe" • ..::.:,:. .:. . 1'.. .•'• • •• .1.t*T.'''.. .>6......' • ' '''.';':!-1..7.7.4,..'''....: 74/1.1. • .. 4;.:si:::::.......:.-.... .• ::•:•• • .• %,::::, ,:..1,1„.... : .6. .....': ' i..... .. .•'!:':::!" ...4..deit,;,,: ..• .: 1,..r :.. • ':''...'....:.-:N :,•,.. :••••,.k ...:,‘. '::.' .:..i.f,.i: 'Si, .. 4410.0e...,' •.. .2., „. . ; ..,... •:.•• i...:.•7.T.;ito •• ''•::* "4".:::":'•- '•i -$ ••''' •10,'?•••,:l'i •':'. . ., .. .• • -1, • , • :i.'...fif s •I''''- ' . . . ,.. . . . 4 ID " : ii• ... : .•-...,.. :Oti''•: 010.' ..' ....-. .. It.: f • .' •*. ..' ;•• .":41;.. •:::::::: • ....FP, :,.• ,:•• . ... . ..... .... • . • ,... „... •. • .. . f •• •'■ . • • •,•;,., ••• .. . .. . . ... •.117. -::.k .• • lea • • , •::• : ...,..f.,,.4.4:' . .i •. . :......ter.,:ir4,..,•• . '•••.. .1 ..,. .:. :.0,......ue..: ',....... 1.. ..4, •.. .1...el ,. . :1•0•4•b;7.- ;.'•' ..- -'. ) • • . -•, ••••• • .... .. . ,.....i.i-' '.';.c.......... :,.. :••'•:.••• .:.. ,.:111 ii'.,•••,.''.. 7:g :.•!;',.::••7•*if...e.. ...iI . .....411.a. ••:. -,,,.., .. •.., • •• • li';':.;'•••t;•''''':/..10 ''''..• , ... • :• ...'s.:. -..f: '.•1,7i:!.1A* .',.:••• '.' ... ..... :••.: ' .0.1.;;?;;Pr• -'•••,;.. ..•;.. *::;. . . i • ••::„, .....,.:;:z.:i.E::::::.. . .. •• . •,....::04::.........: :...i.,; ,...• 4 ',,,••:,,4;'4,717:::r... :..„.kf.':).:fol:.. .::iy,••••*,.::..,..,". • .'. .•:,•.......•-4,....,,, i.„• • : .. Al.,.•,...•,.•.•••••0, ,.:.7.k:,7....;...•...i.::.:::0E:..,j 4 o-.ixii,.m„j..r-.t.,.,.••-....-."r•..•...:....-•1..^1lot. ,-.• ....,..: : . .....,j,i.l:4.....;....,...,: . ...". : .::...: ::... •.. • ....::..A.'...0••.tk.-....,..,....'.• • ' m..•...,:::.. . . :.. ,0*4 4.. . •• ' • '^ •• :•.A41:.::::,•i:miZ.•,' 1.. ,iiiilf • ': lit •'' 1'.'‘......, *•:...:::.r..-- ::' '....:::, . !0!...:•:.•. .. • ...;..... ... . :i. :;:.;... ..1 . . . !... " ...... k• r..,:.... _...„ ,,.,. .....:.,.. ••••••.•"....:;;;;;;;;'-'..".:.....,-,e., \':.'1/4t'''• ••::•••••40:,...f!,•.:0'...... :.•,••••.. . :i.., „::.:•• . .t,'•,•. ".%* ... •ii - # A:••••:...•):. " • • . -.. lia."":"' '•4::::,.:• :,.. ... .•• ..: . .•••••••••`...::.:...:..:.... • " ..4., .• '• .L...*. •• 111•••••... ....,•....,..4::... ":.-t,-.,.• '4::.•'•■ 117tl..:.:*iiri,•%:•••.:64,.,,i4 .•elk '....... " 6.• • % 41■16. ' :* :. *11:'•' •••' 4 . ...e•••■O '...' • . • .•. • • "414 . 41,• • Ai:.• ...... '.:••• p.....• . "..":..:irit.; .: .1,.. • • . • •.'".... : • . .. . ' •...;. ...,•• . .-:.,.....•„ . . .. . •..• 1;‘.E:.,.':.... ,...-• .1v..:..''.'...,.,••:: ..:.:::. :.„. ..,_• .. . • . . q • . : •Q. .• .• • ••..:..•• : ..:....:f.:.. ; .,;..• 4F '',....•4.4..4.::•:.7".' 1" .. -"*. .•'it ..... : . ..:_.'•' • . . •. ... • •,.. . • . ,:i.4...:•:'.,,•'... '..1. ....•. -'?.'••!. Z,'.71.•,: :. qt. .• : '.;:.••••...--. • -:,°...'-'.7116. ••• :Ai. ‘1.'''1'•••''•• : ". • .. • "••• •-•. ,•.. .. ?. '::.7.:•:...• •': ti . •::.•••••:•;••:'!t&tk,.:•: . .. :.• , • 1 ,......-• • ,..I a.r • •••••• . ... •:.:. .rv.FT:c.•..„. ,i ,..,•.... ....I "j1111°41!i . . ..4i,,' . 4.••••. '•• ' ' ..:••.. ,. •',„ .' ..• :r."1•:.. '... .:,:F.F:', 1.!6i1••• g..... "- 4i,,,•-••.....• • ..::-..... .. . .. .... .. ..... • . .... ... ••• ...• . • • ..•••::. •. • ,......."••!:: ... •Nwg•i•••-•.... •1. ..*: • ...,.. ....: :.• .• • ...., . ,.. •••.. . , foir. :..•••:.. . • 227.178 Final action on certain applications required within 120 days; procedure; exceptions; refund of fees. (1) Except as provided in subsections (3) and(4) of this section, the governing body of a city or its designee shall take final action on an application for a permit, limited land use decision or zone change, including resolution of all appeals under ORS 227.180, within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. (2) If an application for a permit, limited land use decision or zone change is incomplete, the governing body or its designee shall notify the applicant of exactly what information is missing. within 30 days of receipt of the application and allow the applicant to submit the missing information. The application shall be deemed complete for the purpose of subsection (1) of this section upon receipt by the governing body or its designee of the missing information. If the applicant refuses to submit the missing information, the application shall be deemed complete for the purpose of subsection(1) of this section on the 31st day after the governing body first received the application. (3) If the application was complete when first submitted or the applicant submits the requested additional information within 180 days of the date the application was first submitted and the city has a comprehensive plan and land use regulations acknowledged under ORS 197.251, approval or denial of the application shall be based upon the standards and criteria that were applicable at the time the application was first submitted. (4) The 120-day period set in subsection (1) of this section may be extended for a reasonable period of time at the request of the applicant. (5) The 120-day period set in subsection (1) of this section applies: (a) Only to decisions wholly within the authority and control of the governing body of the city; and (b) Unless the parties have agreed to mediation as described in ORS 197.318 (2)(b). (6) Notwithstanding subsection (5) of this section, the 120-day period set in subsection (1) of this section does not apply to an amendment to an acknowledged comprehensive plan or land use regulation or adoption of a new land use regulation that was forwarded to the Director of the Department of Land Conservation and Development under ORS 197.610 (1). (7) Except when an applicant requests an extension under subsection (4) of this section, if the governing body of the city or its designee does not take final action on an application for a permit, limited land use decision or zone change within 120 days after the application is deemed complete, the city shall refund to the applicant, subject to the provisions of subsection (8) of this section, either the unexpended portion of any application fees or deposits previously paid or 50 percent of the total amount of such fees or deposits, whichever is greater. The applicant is not liable for additional governmental fees incurred subsequent to the payment of such fees or deposits. However, the applicant is responsible for the costs of providing sufficient additional information to address relevant issues identified in the consideration of the application. (8)(a) To obtain a refund under subsection (7) of this section, the applicant may either: (A) Submit a written request for payment, either by mail or in person, to the city or its designee; or (B) Include the amount claimed in a mandamus petition filed under ORS 227.179. The court shall award an amount owed under this section in its final order on the petition. (b) Within seven calendar days of receiving a request for a refund, the city or its designee shall determine the amount of any refund owed. Payment, or notice that no payment is due, shall be made to the applicant within 30 calendar days of receiving the request. Any amount due and not • • paid within 30 calendar days of receipt of the request shall be subject to interest charges at the rate of one percent per month, or a portion thereof. (c) If payment due under paragraph (b) of this subsection is not paid within 120 days after the city or its designee receives the refund request, the applicant may file an action for recovery of the unpaid refund. In an action brought by a person under this paragraph,the court shall award to a prevailing applicant, in addition to the relief provided in this section, reasonable attorney fees and costs at trial and on appeal. If the city or its designee prevails, the court shall award reasonable attorney fees and costs at trial and on appeal if the court finds the petition to be frivolous. (9) A city may not compel an applicant to waive the 120-day period set in subsection(1) of this section or to waive the provisions of subsection (7) of this section or ORS 227.179 as a condition for taking any action on an application for a permit, limited land use decision or zone change except when such applications are filed concurrently and considered jointly with a plan amendment. [1983 c.827 s.27; 1989 c.761 s.16; 1991 c.817 s.15; 1995 c.812 s.3; 1997 c.844 s.8; 1999 c.533 s.8] 227.179 Petition for writ of mandamus authorized when city fails to take final action on land use application within 120 days; jurisdiction; notice of petition.(1) Except when an applicant requests an extension under ORS 227.178 (4), if the governing body of a city or its designee does not take final action on an application for a permit, limited land use decision or zone change within 120 days after the application is deemed complete, the applicant may file a petition for a writ of mandamus under ORS 34.130 in the circuit court of the county where the application was submitted to compel the governing body or its designee to issue the approval. (2) The governing body shall retain jurisdiction to make a land use decision on the application until a petition for a writ of mandamus is filed. Upon filing a petition under ORS 34.130, jurisdiction for all decisions regarding the application, including settlement, shall be with the circuit court. (3) A person who files a petition for a writ of mandamus under this section shall provide written notice of the filing to all persons who would be entitled to notice under ORS 197.763 and to any person who participated orally or in writing in any evidentiary hearing on the application held prior to the filing of the petition. The notice shall be mailed or hand delivered on the same day the petition is filed. (4) If the governing body does not take final action on an application within 120 days of the date the application is deemed complete, the applicant may elect to proceed with the application according to the applicable provisions of the local comprehensive plan and land use regulations or to file a petition for a writ of mandamus under this section. If the applicant elects to proceed according to the local plan and regulations, the applicant may not file a petition for a writ of mandamus within 14 days after the governing body makes a preliminary decision, provided a final written decision is issued within 14 days of the preliminary decision. (5) The court shall issue a peremptory writ unless the governing body or any intervenor shows that the approval would violate a substantive provision of the local comprehensive plan or land use regulations as those terms are defined in ORS 197.015. The writ may specify conditions of approval that would otherwise be allowed by the local comprehensive plan or land use regulations. [1999 c.533 s.10] 227.180 Review of action on permit application. (1)(a) A party aggrieved by the action of a hearings officer may appeal the action to the planning commission or council of the city, or both, • however the council prescribes. The appellate authority on its own motion may review the action. The procedure for such an appeal or review shall be prescribed by the council, but shall: (A)Not require that the appeal be filed within less than seven days after the date the governing body mails or delivers the decision of the hearings officer to the parties; (B) Require a hearing at least for argument; and (C) Require that upon appeal or review the appellate authority consider the record of the hearings officer's action. That record need not set forth evidence verbatim. (b)Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this subsection, the council may provide that the decision of a hearings officer or other decision-making authority in a proceeding for a discretionary permit or zone change is the final determination of the city. (c) The governing body may prescribe, by ordinance or regulation, fees to defray the costs incurred in acting upon an appeal from a hearings officer, planning commission or other designated person. The amount of the fee shall be reasonable and shall be no more than the average cost of such appeals or the actual cost of the appeal, excluding the cost of preparation of a written transcript. The governing body may establish a fee for the preparation of a written transcript. The fee shall be reasonable and shall not exceed the actual cost of preparing the transcript up to $500. In lieu of a transcript prepared by the governing body and the fee therefor, the governing body shall allow any party to an appeal proceeding held on the record to prepare a transcript of relevant portions of the proceedings conducted at a lower level at the party's own expense. If an appellant prevails at a hearing or on appeal, the transcript fee shall be refunded. (2) A party aggrieved by the final determination in a proceeding for a discretionary permit or zone change may have the determination reviewed under ORS 197.830 to 197.845. (3)No decision or action of a planning commission or city governing body shall be invalid due to ex parte contact or bias resulting from ex parte contact with a member of the decision-making body, if the member of the decision-making body receiving the contact: (a)Places on the record the substance of any written or oral ex parte communications concerning the decision or action; and (b) Has a public announcement of the content of the communication and of the parties' right to rebut the substance of the communication made at the first hearing following the communication where action will be considered or taken on the subject to which the communication related. (4) A communication between city staff and the planning commission or governing body shall not be considered an ex parte contact for the purposes of subsection (3)of this section. (5) Subsection(3) of this section does not apply to ex parte contact with a hearings officer. [1973 c.739 ss.11,12; 1975 c.767 s.9; 1979 c.772 s.12; 1981 c.748 s.43; 1983 c.656 s.2; 1983 c.827 s.25; 1991 c.817 s.12] • �� . .. • `$ k': ,;�z_ `�;..- .=:P ;;c<, ?.-OIIYOFTIGARD � 4' *;� i"� ��.'_7 Y '�ti=, >h` �' �z � :�'�s cF� �. �y �R tf 's�, :tom sz '. - ✓. § " ro- 1f1° E=APPLICATI:ONsCONFERENCE ENOTES Gc . .°r Commun {De"velo , . 'a. - ,` 'z""= 7: sl,:,,. : ,[Pre=Application Meeting Notes,are Valid=for Six`(61 Montnslq S A Community RESIDENTIAL PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: 4,—/o -97 STAFF AT PRE-APP.: LTH/E< APPLICANT: L9vrk AGENT: • Phone:( l 62o- 33 7° Phone: ( 1 PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN.LOCATION: �-45b A It 3.570 Sc ASfi TAX MAP(Sl/LOT#(S): 2.s/r o ,CD - 7� NECESSARYAPPLICATION(SI: ph.A.0 (,*"inee /ec94,,,67,49,„k./'i96s/ t.it C0' '7004b: a USG C�� ,arkX) I.f��isa��tt�� i G✓k$ O?044^-1 0 da/ote</of-(; d,/,ows//•A y ezevik PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Divrde / /o/ /Me, 3 &.no/ gec. ..19. ve o.) Vgz.,,,-/tir e./ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Zo w pek.s% Aslderrhq/ ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: , y 3 C.I.T.AREA: FACILITATOR: PHONE: (503) 1/Joa`/o,o`a(c /e4 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQ IREMENTS MINIMUM LOT SIZE: sq.ft. Average lot width:50'°ft. Maximum building height: 330 ft. • Setbacks: Front Zo ft. Side -5" ft. Rear /S ft. Corner /S" ft.from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: 7' % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: %. [Refer to Code Section 18. 5/o. 2__J ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet, unless lot is created through the Land Partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2% times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1'/z times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. (Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 10 Residential Application/Planning Division Section 1 • CSPE,CIAL SETB S Streets: 3 0 feet from the centerline of 4SX ➢ Flag lot: A ten (10)-foot side yard setback applies to all primary structures. ➢ Zero lot line lots: A minimum of a ten (10)-foot separation shall be maintained between each dwelling unit or garage. ➢ Multi-family residential building separation standards apply within multiple-family residential developments. [Refer to Code Section 18.730) ACCESSORY STRUCTURES UP TO 528 SQUARE FEET in size may be permitted on lots less than 2.5 acres in size. Five (5)-foot minimum setback from side and rear lot lines. ACCESSORY STRUCTURE UP TO 1,000 SQUARE FEET on parcels of at least 2.5 acres in size. [See applicable zoning district for the primary structures'setback requirements.] SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLIC A • ► - - - of Tigard, applicant's are REQUIRED to complete and file . -- :. ision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office i • - - o obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name. Applications wil •• : - . -p ed as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from •- 'ounty of the Subdivision Name Reservation. [County Surveyors Office: 503-648-88841 FLAG LOT BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 11/2 STORIES or 25 feet, whichever is less in most zones; 21/2 stories, or 35 feet in R-7, R-12, R-25 or R-40 zones provided that the standards of Code Section 18.730.O10.C.2. are • d ESIDENTIAL DENSITY CAL [See ex e NE I ESIDENTIAL UNITS ALLOWED on a particular site may be calculated by dividing the net area of the developable land by the minimum number of square feet required per dwelling unit as specified by the applicable zoning designation. Net development area is calculated by subtracting the following land area(s)from the gross site area: All sensitive lands areas including: ➢ Land within the 100 year floodplain; ➢ Slopes exceeding 25%; ➢ Drainageways; and ➢ Wetlands for the R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 zoning districts. Public right-of-way dedication: ➢ Single-family allocate 20% of gross acres for public facilities; or ➢ Multi-family allocate 15% of gross acres for public facilities; or ➢ If available, the actual public facility square footage can be used for deduction. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.715] EXAMPLE OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATIONS: EXAMPLE: USING A ONE ACRE SITE IN THE R-12 ZONE(3,050 MINIMUM LOT SIZE)WITH NO DEDUCTION FOR SENSITIVE LANDS Single-Family Multi-Family 43,560 sq.ft. of gross site area 43,560 sq. ft. of gross site area 8.712 sq.ft. (20%)forpublic right-of-way 6.534 sq. ft. (15%)for public right-of-way NET: 34,848 square feet NET: 37,026 square feet 3.050 (minimum lot area) - 3.050(minimum lot area) = 11.4 Units Per Acre = 12.1 Units Per Acre *The Development Code requires that the net site area exist for the next whole dwelling unit.NO ROUNDING UP IS PERMITTED. *Minimum Project Density is 80%of the maximum allowed density.TO DETERMINE THIS STANDARD, MULTIPLY THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS BY.8. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 10 Residential Application/Planning Division Section • • �CKS The perimeter of BLOCKS FORMED BY STREETS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1,800 FEET measured along the right-of-way line except where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development. When block lengths greater than 600 feet are permitted, pedestrian/bikeways shall be provided through the block. (Refer to Code Section 18.810.0901 [IFTDIIISTREET PLAN AND EXTENSION OF STREETS A FUTURE STREET PLAN shall: D Be filed by the applicant in conjunction with an application for a subdivision or partition. The plan shall show the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division and shall include boundaries of the proposed land division and shall include other parcels within 200 feet surrounding and adjacent to the proposed land division. D Identify existing or proposed bus routes, pullouts or other transit facilities, bicycle routes and pedestrian facilities on or within 500 feet of the site. Where necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed. (Refer to Code Section 18.810.030.FJ AND ACCES PARKING AREAS AND DRIVEWAYS MUST BE PAVED. ➢ Single-family Requires: One (1) off-street parking space per dwelling unit; and One (1) space per unit less than 500 square feet. ➢ Multiple-family Requires: 1.25 spaces per unit for 1 bedroom; 1.5 spaces per unit for 2 bedrooms; and 1.75 spaces per unit for 3 bedrooms. Multi-family dwelling units with more than ten (10) required spaces shall provide parking for the use of guests and shall consist of 15% of the total required parking. NO MORE THAN 40% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet. 6 inches X 18 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet. 6 inches X 16 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Handicapped parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. [Refer to Code Section 18.105 a 18.7651 BICYCLE RACKS BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL A1ND IND TRIAL DEVEL Bicycle racks s afi"6e locatedirr eas protected from atitomobile traffic d in con ient locations. (Refer to Code Section 18.765) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 10 Residential Application/Planning Division Section • • ACCESS WAYS Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: Maximum access width: Minimum pavement width: • REQUIRED WALKWAY LOCATION Within all : A HED HOUSI (exc-et two-family dwelling and multi- :mily developments, each residen 'al dwelli • SHALL :E CONN ∎TED BY WA -' AY TO THE 'TCULA AR NG A ,, COMMON • 'EN . 'ACE AND REC' ATION • A CILITIES. (Refer to Code Section 18.705) EAR VISION AR e ity requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT AT ROAD/DRIVEWAY, ROAD/RAILROAD, AND ROAD/ROAD INTERSECTIONS. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) BUFFERTNC AND SCR EENIN Mr! increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the CITY REQUIRES . LANDSCAPED BUFFER AREAS ALONG CERTAIN SITE PERIMETERS. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Community Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.145) The REQUIRED BUFFER AND SCREENING STANDARDS that are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: along the north boundary. along the east boundary. along the south boundary. along the west boundary. ARE: w,�� ��,�✓q�� 0/p,vewQy s�.�,� '57,C4/co w e � STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a.minimum caliper of at least two(2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.705,18.745 a 18.7651 CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 10 Residential Appllcatloe/Planniag Dhdslon Section • • BEQUIREME A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. The TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D. according to the following standards: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.790.060.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; b Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; b Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ TIGATION) REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance' with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property; and ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN-LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.11 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 10 Residential Application/Planning RlYlslon Section • • • SIGNS SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is—revie e� as,part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Adjustment application may be-filed for Director's review. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7801 SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25%, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminarily identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas. and their boundaries. is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7151 STEEP SLOPES When STEEP SLOPES exist, p 'or to issu ecan of�aa�final. order, 1a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses th approval standards of fhe,ZigaCommunity Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The re ort shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Sections 18.775.080.C.2. and 18.775.080.C.3. f UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY(USA)BUFFER STANDARDS,RESOLUTION AND ORDINANCE IR 8 0196-44 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: THE VEGETATED CORRIDOR SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 25 FEET WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries bf the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of la portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area,of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25% of the length of the vegetated corridor within the development or project site can be less th2 feetinwvid In case, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of ,7 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, EXCEPT AS ALLOWED AS FOLLOWS: CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 10 Residential IIpgllcation/PIanntng Chalon Section . • • > A GRAVEL WALKWAY OR BIKE PATH, NOT EXCEED G EIGHT`(8)-FEET IN WIDTH. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated cord i.or must be widened,by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not .e constructed closer thallten (10) feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approve' by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturb- ce to existing vegetation; and > WATER QUALITY FACILITIES may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of ten(10) feet with the approval of the Agency or City. • Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES M LTIPLE PARCELS OR LOTS intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetate' corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part • . , .1. cel to be used for he construction of a dwelling unit. [Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulatio,s-Chapter 3,Design f I WM] , WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT THE WATER RESOURCES (WR) OV 'LAY DISTRICT implements - - policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to r-solve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and rip. ian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapt-r allows.reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards o: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; aintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; m imize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve sceni recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: THE WR OVER ' CT ALSO MEETS THE R. QUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natur I Resources) a : the "safe harbor" pro 'sions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 3). These provision equire that "sig 'ficant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and pr tested. The Tualatin - -r, which is al.o a "fish-bearing stream," has an average • annual flow of m re than 1,000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which ar mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an avers a annual flow less than 1,000 cubic feet per second (cfs). ➢ MAJOR ST EAMS IN TIGARD INCLUDE FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FO AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS)AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are N oT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor stream-V in Tigard include Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and -rtain short tributaries of the Tualatin River. Ri•ar an -tback Area: THI' AREA MEAS RED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TU A LATIN RIV - • "-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is 'seater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 091(1)(d). The standard Tualatin River riparian setback is 75 feet, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 10 Residential Application/Planning Division Section • • ➢ The major streams riparian setback is 50 feet, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ Isolated wetlands and minor streams (including adjacent wetlands ave no riparian anstback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Unifi d Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. (Refer to Code Section 18.197.030] Riparian Setback Reductions The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION 0 THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50 o to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through st eambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian .etback area. Elie ibili for Ri.arian Setback in Dist eed Areas. To be ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIA SETBACK RE IP • TION, the appli ant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substan;ally disturbed at the 'me this reg lation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetation Study r-. ired by Section 18.797.050.0 that demonstrates all of the following: ➢ Native plant species curre ly cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; ➢ The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been remo ed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five (5) years; ➢ ves ° : on was ne removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.797.050 regulating removal of native e . t species; ➢ That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. (Refer to Code Section 18.797.100) RRATIVE The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings for all applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. Applicant should review code for applicable criteria. AP 18.330 8.390 18.520 t/ 18.715 ✓18.765 _ 18.795 18.350 x/18.420 _ 18.530 x/18.730 18.775 _ 18.797 18.360 _ 18.430 _ 18.620 1/1.8.745 _ 18.780 18.370 18.510 r/ 18.705 _ 18.755 , - 18.790 IMPACT STUD' As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to include impact study with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050] CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 01 10 Residential Application/Planning Division Section • • GHBORHOOD MEETING he APPLIC SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APPROP IATE CIT FACILITATOR of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] UILDING PERMI OR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to .contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH. THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). RECYCLING Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7551 ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: • 6.,Za i r�.^S/ 0-r,---. /o co-, i,( a 1%Qc.�.:y ? /Y1vs�h1 �S0v 7_ -,f bier lvS,V/ 6 I' - dr;VP y C- 44 or /5 46 r;01S��,✓ th gt-,tqh,, or/ /357o -G „ iS i/Li/7'1 ? . "7/7 �.r�51c 4.0/? revs,Idol■ees i%s./ !� • Judi !h ri, -,,/n2P 4c-oo// /;tc/,'ca-es 4 & i4ar, L..s,S l.✓41�9c.$1 eke �) ePr�,�:sirr �'e1�4 (.,�., 3 v�Tis 41 `i:vs.- 1 2 (-4 7� ��le,e. .N«</ 4,2/,//...,-- -- :r Sec 2-/9-95, -e-q /14cs `' 0� CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 10 Residential Application/Planning Division Section • • PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. (g.r C dVhbv9( 7 - Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing .before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS • All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week • days• Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 8'/' x 11" reduced scale site plan of the proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or Administrative Decision. Application with unfolded maps 'shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A ten (10) business day, public appeal geriod follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard Ciy ( tic,/ . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of.the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE, (unless deemed unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: 1ZAa /114 clerks CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP.MEETING PHONE: (503)639-4111 FAX: (503)684-1291 E-MAIL (staffs first name) @a.tigard.or.us TITLE 18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODEI INTERNET ADDRESS: ci.tlgard.or.us i:\curpin\masters\revised\preapp-r.mst (Engineering section:preapp.eng)\ Updated: Jun.7,99 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 10 0110 BesidentialApplcation/Planning Division Section • • • CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form careful) in con'unction with the notes •rovided to ou at the •re- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: rilm/&a n Date: r;'/o 99 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed envelopes and a notarized list of all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be legal-size, addressed with 1"x 4" labels Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) • Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or.plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION(Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): IW Vicinity Map Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan IB Existing Conditions Map El----Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map LT reliminary Storm Drainage Plan I -' -Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan COY Site Development Plan ( )lice COY-Architectural Drawings (4.Q,f%x) t - Landscape Plan ❑ Sign Drawings Ilan Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES <2,(( COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 • • • • 4. • SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ • Habitat Area Evaluation • ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200')and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 81/2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). icinity Ma� V-Cc ,4aXe5",4 Showing the location of the site in relation to: cvQ ��4/��t., • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ xisting Co itions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines(2' intervals for 0-10%slopes or 5'for slopes>10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with>_6"caliper measured 4'from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ Locations of existing utilities and easements 0 ❑ Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 • • • • • Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer,engineer surveyor and desig (as applicable) ❑ Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of subdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10%gr-Oes and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adj. -nt to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone transmission lines (50,1.1 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks, open sp- es, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a di- eter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structure .1nd the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platti r. ❑ Supplemental informatio• ncluding: • Proposed deed - trictions (if any) ❑ • A proposed • an for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing nat . features including rock outcroppings,wetlands and marsh areas The prop•sed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ Pr- ' nary Partition/Lot Line Adjustme = • The owner of the subject parcel ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ Contour lines(2' intervals for slopes 0-10%or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Location,width and names of streets,easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25' of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4'above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 . • • ite Development-Pla 4:: ('t k it V The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑. • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25' of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped , ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ l andscape Pla Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location,size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location,size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas,and common open spaces ❑ • blic Improvements/ re• s Pla Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 • • •Ing/Erosion Control Pla► The loca tons an• extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and-proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios. ❑ ices Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ reliminary Storm rainage The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location,width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ ree Preservation/Mitigation PI Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ &rctrttec ural`nrawin ✓Ciir/ci• 2 Ac. Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ • • is\;curpin\masters\revised\chklist.doc 26-Nov-98 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 • • T'" •• PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCENOTES 1 ., ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q . - Shaprnp!BetterCommumty, oZc-D PUBLIC FACILITIES ,3 te1261aP The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ( SW As Sr. to feet from centerline. 6,.twoE. c �7 RAD,.,5 Q ( ►at, to 30 Q.A➢t vs feetireaxteentedine. • ( bdr w,►,u� '1 . to 2S feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: Sty t k ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb . El storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. • CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department Section • '( ) stremprovements will be necessary al. - . to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete-curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: • ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2.) ( vi" Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department section are on the opposite of the street from the site. If th a in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains thMerhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW Ash T. . Prior to Pec PW.K P , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located Sw A5“ mss*. . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to II 2c)40;€ 9Lwrc2_ LA-1.606-5 Ta Try 146/4 P JPus,c Utxr. Water Supply: Ave I„,',) The Cm.i cp -174,1 ) . - Phone:(503) (LAq •4111 provides public water service in thelarea of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. ° t Ct✓ D��fC 't ia.1 IS R-■t fele>. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Depattment Section ' newly created impervious •faces. The resolution contains a pikisiori that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided scific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ( ) Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ( L Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments:. All proposed sanitary sewer and . storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. 6-)4b P cJ' 7it-47 Slut IMf AJEM��4(> 11)c- Stasti D5 -64"-r 'r+c SZR6CcS AGVac�rs� -c 1-06 Qe,A MC.sc' vw..iz> t, - ltAPNAtIC> To Crr ui4)antes . C t�TC lA 6)01P t A' e I t i�T,c t,. 'irk fi M V ads)$ eD o-L -ft-- ttlihr--'r Trio GtT.( V■b..t-{ • i# OGt j --rots APtflwA'fIOl.A v j� T• 1unf tosK6tsC', TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. PA Fc PERMITS -- Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section • In addition, the pe'tee will be required to post a borOor similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public. improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: if an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter. at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS F(SUBDIVISIONS • All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall. also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: •. to t ct ENGINEERING DEP ;TMENT ST . Phone: (5031639-4171 Fax: [5031684-1297 • h:\patty\masters\preapp.eng (Master section:preapp-r.mst) 04-March-1999 • • CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section ,,�'-.Y:.":'',gl`x-.4 :#:z, -4,,,!ITYOFTICARD T,.4, r.,r t _w,,:.;i G r: np"-.r,. r4c'ragi Y' t..;,..;—5:x::;.,...,4.:.�NY.==r."c`-:tea a_ �«•vs;"4,.a.�y,<.;,;M`';`�:„;s..'Y�,fi.'-:,as.. .F,.Y� 4. ' e .i �' � .� y; cvPy 0s` 1�* Y s « :4 .y ear :�aA:.J.:;:. t x L „,,,,>,c w,qt . ifwwa.-¢:, :°+";3Ti Lk.qxw•r Sii«ce ^ , ':ti'I5'' rarw..«i";.,�ss2�W'a f.".�9; .:rot!littittsteaiity,isii‘"AL;Ttgitia,pfilliit-r10-404-n-li •,�Pr .�r.1 w. qa. :.�::a v�°':�» ...e\IhI u n4i, P ACONFERENCE s ,t,.., '?;;2•,y�cCy,�w,,,A;A +a„'0»,,.t�./41..�lg$- a:''"� 3s „'n ?.:-1,�a m„rK?n;�,�iY�Vr�.1 r-*X” 3<.6r,s; ^'r :f��l 4'- <kf`:�; e ;S�I`1_pA�BCttEI tie Y yi ilt ere= nitration Meetl NotesareVaIlator shca)Montiis : :~u ka 77 . . RESIDENTIAL PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: 01/`qq d q STAFF AT PRE-APP.: 3-747 A APPLICANT: .49vri 4/a/r, AGENT: Phone:I 16 -3 370 Phone: [ l PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN.LOCATION: 9G 5'o ,S v Fes�"q it 7t /35/0 fm745/ TAX MAPS)/LOT#[SI: s7 ea c.' -�¢b NECESSAW' IPPLICATION[SJ: P -I- horn,. /,04-/ 4/ t2 e - di//e x gi c/ -ssI4 lc e V cm 4rigrtCes 1-or' Gc/io�T�i 6P250,rk. pvrie>(44 /'eqr-p.-o/SCkbe?Ckll/ PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: ', k / / COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Lot,/ ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: Re./_ c C.I.T.AREA: so,i FACILITATOR: PHONE (503) ONING.DIS.TRICT DIMENSIONAL ; 01.11'EMEN Minimum lot size. q.�t. 4 verage lot width:��9�ft. Maximum building height: 3o ft. Setbacks: Front 2_0 ft. Side S ft. Rear /S ft. Corner /S ft. from street. Maximum site coverage: --- % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: --% [Refer to Code Section 18.50. )5O l llD111ONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIR EME Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet, unless lot is created through the Minor Land Partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The depth of all lots shall not exceed 2' times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1' times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. [Refer to Code Section 18.164.060 Lots) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 12 Residential IWplleatien/flaeolp,DMsloe Section 1 �RTING1& RiQUEST Pl ease . S Read To: G ,%Th PL t ilC ❑ Handle ,41 i ❑ Approve And... .Dr3 y ®10 rward GD ❑ Return ❑ Keep or Recycle ❑ Review with Me From: J(1I q!J Post-it®7664 03M 1995 ) Date: ' --19- / X eSFECMSETBACKS • • _,�➢ Streets: 30 feet from the centerline of 7-7,15" ➢ Established areas: feet from �`� ➢ Lower intensity zones: feet, along the site's boundary. —s'➢ Flag lot: Ten (10)-foot side yard setback. ➢ Zero lot line lots: Minimum ten (10)-foot separation between buildings. ➢ Multi-family residential building separation: (Refer to Code Section 18.96.030) ACCESSORY STRUCTURES UP TO 528 SQUARE FEET in size may be permitted on lots less than 2.5 acres in size. Five (5)-foot minimum setback from side and rear lot lines. Accessory structure up to 1000 square feet on parcels of at least 2.5 acres in size. (See applicable zoning district setbacks for primary structuresJ SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION Prior to submitting a Subdivision land use application with the City of Ti•- pplicant's are REQUIRED to complete and file a subdivision plat naming re• - _e Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approvallreserva '•• any subdivision name. Applications will not be accepted as complete until th- eceives the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdivis'•• ' = - -eservation. (Coon►' urveyor's Office: 648-8884) FLAG LOT BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 11/2 STORIES or 25 feet, whichever is less in mos •• =s ' -stories, or 35 feet in .1- - , •r - • • zones provide• t at the standards of Code Section 18.98.030(B) are satisfied. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULON iSee example belowl The NET REST, TIAL UNITS allowe• • - particular site may be calculated by dividing the net area of the developable land by the minimum number of square feet required per dwelling unit as specified by the applicable zoning designation. Net development area is calculated by subtracting the following land area(s) from the gross site area: All sensitive lands areas including: ➢ Land within the 100 year floodplain; ➢ Slopes exceeding 25%; and ➢ Drainageways. Public right-of-way dedication. ➢ Single-family allocate 20% of gross acres for public facilities; and ➢ Multi-family allocate 15% of gross acres for public facilities. (Refer to Code Section 18.921 EXAMPLE OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATIONS: EXAMPLE: USING A ONE ACRE SITE IN THE R-12 ZONE(3,050 MINIMUM LOT SIZE)WITH NO DEDUCTION FOR SENSITIVE LANDS Single-Family Multi-Family 43,560 sq.ft.of gross site area 43,560 sq.ft. of gross site area 8,712 sq.ft. (20%) for public right-of-way 6,534 sa.ft. (15%) for public right-of-way NET: 34,848 square feet NET: 37,026 square feet 3.050 (minimum lot areal - 3.050 (minimum lot area) = 11.4 Units Per Acre = 12.1 Units Per Acre *The Development Code requires that the net site area exist for the next whole dwelling unit.NO ROUNDING OP IS PERMITTED. CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Applcanon Conference Notes Page 2 of 12 Residential Aoolleatlonielaaaleg Melon Section • •� • • ie perimeter of BLOCKS FORMED BY STREETS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1,800 FEET measured along the right-of-way line except where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development. When block lengths greater than 600 feet are permitted, pedestrian/bikeways shall be provided through the block. (Refer to Code Section 18.164.0401 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TRANSFER The City of Tigard allows a RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TRANSFER OF UP TO 25% of th- - s that could otherwise have been developed on sensitive lands areas listed in the den • a culations that may be applied to the developable portion of the site. (Refer to Code Section 18.92.0301. It is the ressonsibili of a - - ,e scant for a residential development application to PROVIDE A DETAILED • ' . gra TION FOR BOTH the permitted residential density and the requested density er. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TRANSITION "A z�" - " Regardless of the allowed housing density in a zoning �g isd ct, ANY PROPERTY W - T OF A DESIGNATED ESTABLISHED AREA SHALL NOT BE P. - -D AT A DENSITY GREATER THAN 125% of the maximum Compre live—P an designation (not zoning) of the adjacent parcel. Transition area a p(ies-to-a property which is a designated established area. The subject prope esi a as an e.,s191/,x, / area. • ct property is adjoined by established/developing/areas to the north, south, east and west. r ai.1f I;1:ij'13;t11A[irtat,4i,1i'•; A FUTURE STREET PLAN shall: ➢ Be filed by the applicant in conjunction with an application for a subdivision or partition. The plan shall show the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division and shall include boundaries of the proposed land division and shall include other parcels within 200 feet surrounding and adjacent to the proposed land division. ➢ Identify existing or proposed bus routes, pullouts or other transit facilities, bicycle routes and pedestrian facilities on or within 500 feet of the site. Where necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed. (Refer to Code Section 18.164.030] ESIDENTIA1 DEVE JMENTIOIAR ACCESS REQUIREMENT ALL SUBDIVISIONS AND MINOR PARTITIONS ARE SUBJECT TO SOLAR ACCESS REQUIREMENTS. These requirements state that a minimum of 80% of all lots created must be oriented for solar accessibility. The basic standard, which determines solar accessibility, requires that 80% of total number of proposed lots: ➢ Demonstrate a north-south dimension of at least 90 feet. ➢ Demonstrate a front lot line orientation within 30 degrees of a true east-west axis. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-AppllcatIon Conference Notes Page 3 of 12 Besldeatlal Asellatloe/Pleaeles IMsloo Settles The total or partial exempt of a site from the solar access regment may be approved for the . following reasons: ➢ East, west or north slopes steeper than 20%. ➢ Off-site shade sources (structures, vegetation, topography). ➢ On-site shade sources (vegetation). Adjustments allowing a reduction of the 80% solar lot design requirement may be made for the following reasons: ➢ Reduced density or an increased cost of at least five (5)% due to either: b East, west or north slope greater than 10%. • Significant natural feature. ▪ Existing road or lotting pattern. b Public easement or right-of-way. ➢ Reduction in important development amenities. ➢ Pre-existing shade (vegetation). PLEASE NOTE: Maps and text are required which are sufficient to show that the development complies with the solar design standards,or that specific lots should be exempted or adjusted out. The following items shall be included in the analysis: ➢ The north-south lot dimension and front lot line orientation of each proposed lot. ➢ Protected solar building lines and relevant building site restrictions, if applicable. ➢ For the purpose of identifying trees related to exemption requests, a map showing existing trees which are at least 30 feet tall and over 6 inches diameter at a point 4 feet above grade shall be submitted. THIS MAP SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: ▪ Height; Diameter; Species; and Statement declaring that they are to be retained. ➢ Copies of all private restrictions relating to solar access. The design characteristics of a developed solar-oriented lot are high levels of wintertime sun striking the south walls and roofs of the house, house orientation maximizing south window area, and a south-sloping roof area. To achieve this, one may utilize the following: • Protected Solar Building Line- The solar building line must: b be oriented to within 30 degrees of a true east-west axis; • provide a minimum distance of 70 feet from the middle of the lot to the south property line; provide a minimum distance of 45 feet from the northernmost buildable boundary of the subject lot to the north property line. ➢ Performance Options- There are two performance options which may be utilized as follows: The house to be oriented within 30 degrees of an east-west axis and have at least 80% of the ground floor's south wall protected from shade. At least 32% of the glass and 500 square feet of the roof area face south and be protected from shade. CITY OF UGAI U Pre-Agpncatlon Conference Notes Page 4 0112 Sesldeetlel IDpllatlon/Pleeelu!Milan Section • PLEASE NOTE: Regardless of the Monts)used through the design of the Subdivision or Minor Land Partition,all . one and two family,single-family residences are reviewed through the building permit process for compliance with Solar Balance Point standards. Please contact the Building Division for further information regarding the Solar Balance Point standards and the options that are available related to building height and construction. C PAR N6 AND ACCES RrL-E P ING AREAS AND DRIVEWAYS MUST BE PAVED. ➢ Single family: Requires two (2) off-street parking spaces per dwelling unit. ➢ Multiple family: Requires 1.5 parking spaces per unit for 1 bedroom. (Multi-family-requires 2 parking spaces per unit for 1+bedrooms.) Multi-family dwelling units with more than 10 required spaces shall provide parking for the use of guests and shall consist of 15% of the total required parking. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.0301 - NO MORE THAN 40% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: • Standard parking space dimensions: 8 ft. 8 inches X 18 ft. ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 8 ft. X 15 ft. ➢ Handicapped parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. BICYCLE RACKS BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND I RIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from a o ile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on t - • sis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: Maxi cess width: Minimum pavement width: REQUIRED WALKWAY LOCATION Within all ATTACHED HOUSING (except two-family dwellings) and multi-fami •- - -. - - - -, -ach residential dwelling SHALL BE CONNECTED BY � -� • HE VEHICULAR PARKING —ARI=A;G8 = • • CREATION FACILITIES. EAR VISION Ali The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE AND EIGHT FEET IN HEIGHT AT ROAD/DRIVEWAY, ROAD/RAILROAD, AND ROAD/ROAD INTERSECTIONS. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Code Section 18.1021 • CRY IN MAN Pre-Applleafloa Conference Notes Page 5 of 12 BaaldeotlafBDellaatlhUllaaalee Division Da tion ERRING AND'SCREENIN • or er to Increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the CITY REQUIRES LANDSCAPED BUFFER AREAS ALONG CERTAIN SITE PERIMETERS. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Community Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1001 The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along the d:veu/4y rei � 4,4 fln re wl ..// TREE STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two inches when measured four feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.100,18.106 and 18.1081 'TAEE-REMOVAPWINEIWIREMEN1 it" A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for wh' - a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review • armed development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where po •le. The TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: Identification of the location, size and species of all existi - ees including trees designated as significant by the city; Identification of a program to save existi•. rees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the r -cement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: Retainage of s than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program accordjq o Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50%of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Appicaflon Conference Notes Page 6.1 12 Boeldontlll dpollettlhUPlaaelog OMtloo Section • Retainage of ti 50 to 75%of existing trees over 12 inches caliper requires that 50%of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; • • Retainage of 75%or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by th applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a development applic t ion listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to-Section 18.150.070.D. [Refer to Code Section 18.150.025) MITIGATION REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according t he following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially simil species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of t tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replac ent with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ➢ If a replacement tree of the size t is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director sh require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: ➢ The number of replace ent trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tr removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replace nt trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the D' ctor may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property wit 'n the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ Thep nting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow g/ro h to maturity. IN-LIEU/OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the content of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree placement. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.070(DI SIGNS SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN '0.114e-City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available iti�onal sign area or height beyond Code standards may be p.e.rcnitted-if1he sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development revie_ w a�pjatiee—A1 evely, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review-before-the Hearings Officer. 4�c,/ ✓cq� s ii►o%c9 a� c�xflgac�s i �� Growrvv-S4 ENSITI LA SS vn�lle vas,/ t 1 dt2'•H,%.c�s s771-: t eCIA r;; ex,s '�� /� 3' e ode provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25%, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminarily identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. CITY OF TIGARD Pro-Appncatlon Conference Notes Page 7 of 12 IssIdutlal Aoplleatloa/Plaoalo0 OMsloa Sutton Chapter 18.84 also provi• regulations for the use, protection,. modification of sensitive lands . areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.84) STEEP SLOPES • -1 'rf,4/4...When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.84.040.B. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of 18.84.040.B.2 and 18.84.040.B.3. t UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY(USA)BUFFER STANDARDS,RESOLUTION AND ORDINANCE(R a 01 96-44 ZF9��1,� Land DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 25 FEET WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25% of the length of the vegetated corridor within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, EXCEPT AS ALLOWED BELOW: > A gravel walkway or bike path, not exceeding 8 feet in width. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and > Water quality facilities may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of 10 feet with the approval of the Agency or City. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS OR LOTS intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. (Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SWMI WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT fr The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard // Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page$of 12 assldentlel ApplIcstlon/PlennIng Division Section • • storage capacity; preservetive plant cover; minimize streambaaerosion; maintain and enhance - fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions require that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs). ➢ MAJOR STREAMS IN TIGARD INCLUDE FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS) AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). ➢ The standard Tualatin River riparian setback is 75 feet, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ The major streams riparian setback is 50 feet, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ Isolated wetlands and minor streams (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. (Refer to Code Section 18.85.010] Riparian Setback Reductions The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVE ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the pla ent of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that al or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through streamba estoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian s- :-ck area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. To be ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK RE* - ON, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially dist =-• at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on t.- egetation Study required by Section 18.85.050.0 that demonstrates all of the followin•• ➢ Native plant spec*- currently cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; ➢ The tree copy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees h a not been removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; ➢ Tat vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.85.050 regulating removal of native plant species; CRY OF TIGARD Pro-Appgcatlon Conference Notes Page 9 01 12 seslleotlsl ADDllestloUPlanuIng DMsloo Section ➢ • That there will be n•ringement into the 100-year floodplaland ➢ , The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. (Refer to Code Section 18.85.100) HA he APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings for all applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. Applicant should review code for applicable criteria. CODE SECTIONS _ .18.80 /18.92 '18.102 _ 18.116 18.150 _ 18.84 18.96 �8.106 _ 18.120 18.160 18.85 _ 18.98 V-18.108 18.130 ,./-'18.162 Z 18.88 JZ18.100 _ 18.114 ✓18.134 ✓18.164 M APCT ST 1 s a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to include impact study with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.32 Section.0501 WHEN A CONDITION OF APPROVAL REQUIRES TRANSFER TO THE PUBLIC OF AN INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.32 Section.250) NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 250 FEET AND---THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR of their proposal. A minimum of two (2)-wee s etween the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please 'ew-the and Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeti g-ne • . *Note: In order to also-pre iminarily address building code standards,a meeting wither s Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) ILDi IG PERMITS P OR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. CITY OFTIGARD Pre-AADnIIcatlon Conference Notes Page 10 of 12 Besldeatlal Mplleetloe/Pleoaln0 DMsloa Seethe RECYCLING • Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULE- • - - , - ► i APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY with P ' -a •osal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Dispos _at-F503j -6177. �[Re ode Section 18.116) ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: i Svre /o ecJ/hss , rel'/e. r�e� /he,S cr g�.� (/Pact, �vQrt2 o/zt c5 010 1704- a/c 7 `I' A Qic,,te_5 • Ci' /ec o c% 4o�sf w ih g••.441io.., r1,2J3s740 —1 ey Ai// ?Z ;l C. S91n c, /P N• e • rye LP90-06/ r10''C�L_ i AI^SLv ii , - ••:fs 3 o. V 'h Ac, 4/Jo�.._4-7-I - •Wex A/cc d 74. c,C.✓cftCSiS i.S. f - .e 20' rez. PrbAe/-A. /.- - o. -A/357o ' A -7 �1 ILL .c / c✓ PROCEDURE /Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. PLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCES AI—APP e - - BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 8y" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20 day public appeal_period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard 1//9onP Cmmirs5j1 . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process iavailable from the Planning Division upon request. This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. CITY OF TIGABO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 11 of 12 BesldsntlalAaalleatlen/Plannlag Melon Settles • • PLEASE NOTE The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE, (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: 3-01)'43 y� CITY OF TIGARD I LANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP.MEETING PHONE (503)639-4171 FAX: (503)684-7291 E-MAIL: (staff's first name)@Cl.tigard.Or.IIS h:Vogin\patty\masters\preapp-r.mst (Engineering section:preapp.eng) 5-Feb-98 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-ApplcatIon Conference Notes Page 12 of 12 Isldentlas Application/Miming OMstoa Salim CITY OF TIGARD • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - APPLICATION CHECKLIST l- ''_t'll CITY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: . ufr . Date: APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ,/ MARKED ITEMS A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner's signature/written authorization C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies /2_ E) Filing Fee ieS_c arc (SITE-SPECIFIC MAP(S)/PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ,/ MARKED ITEMS I A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies /Z • 1. Vicinity map 2. Site size & dimensions ©/ 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10'% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) t� 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: o (a) Floodplain areas ❑ (b) Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ (c) Unstable ground ❑ (d) Areas with high seasonal water table ❑ (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils o 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: ❑ (a) Wildlife habitats ❑ (b) Wetlands ❑ 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings ❑ (b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level 8. Location of existing structures and their uses 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources ❑ 10. Location of existing utilities and easements r�- 11. Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways • LAND USE APPLICATION J LIST PAGE 1 OF 3 i B) Site Development Pfan Indicating: No. of Copies 1. The proposed site and surrounding properties • 2. Contour line intervals ❑ 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site • ❑ (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension ❑ 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site ❑ (b) Parking and circulation areas ❑ (c) Loading and services area ❑ (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ (e) Outdoor common areas ❑ (f) Above ground utilities ❑ 5. The location, dimensions & setb 5 distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structyres, improvements, utilities, and easements which are looted on the site and on adjacent property within 25 f-et of the site ❑ (b) Proposed structu -s, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ 6. Storm drainage .cilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ 7. Sanitary sew- facilities ❑ 8. The locat'3 n areas to be landscaped ❑ 9. The to .tion and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prey-ntion techniques ❑ 10. a location of mailboxes ❑ 11; The location of all structures and their orientation ❑ 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scab as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following informati• : 1 . The location and extent to which grading will take pla - indicating: (a) General contour lines ❑ (b) Slope ratios ❑ (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) ❑ (d) Approximate time of year for th- imposed site development ❑ 2. A statement from a registered engi eer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration geotechnical engineering report ❑ (b) The validity of sa in Lary sewer and storm drainage service proposals ❑ (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION/UST PAGE 2 OF 5 - D) Architectural Dravlips Indicating: •No. of Copies_ The site development plan proposal shall include: 1. Floor plans indicating the squ re-feotage of all structures proposed for use ite 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies /7i The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1. Description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings ,❑� 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials ❑ 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions ❑ (b) Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ F) Sign Drawings: ❑ Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18. of the Code as part of the Site Development Review or prior-tobtaining a Building Permit to construct a sign. G) Traffic ation Estimate: ❑ H) Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Map Indicating: No. of Copies /Z— 1. The owner of the subject parcel ❑� 2. The owner's authorized agent t� 3. The map scale (20,50,100 or 200 feet=1) inch north arrow and date E� 4. Description of parcel location and boundaries ®/ 5. Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel 6. Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines 7. Location and width of all water courses 8. Location of any trees within 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level 9. All slopes greater than 25% 10. Location of existing utilities and utility easements 11. For major land partition which creates a public street: (a) The proposed right-of-way location and width ❑ (b) A scaled cross-section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip ❑ 12. Any applicable deed restrictions 0-- 13. Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable LAND USE APPLIGTION/UST PAGE 3 OF 5 • . I) Subdivision Prelimit. Plat Map and Data Indicating: IV. of Copies • , 1. Scale equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet ❑ 2. The proposed name of the subdivision • 3. Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ 4. Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer and designer (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of application ❑ 6. Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded owners o adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land o 8. Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2-f.ot intervals for 0-10% grades greater than 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, location, type and size of all the following within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): (a) Public and private right-of-ways and easements o (b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer Ii es 0 (c) Domestic water mains including fire hydran, 0 (d) Major power telephone transmission lines 50,000 volts or greater) 0 (e) Watercourses ❑ (f) Deed reservations for parks, open spat s, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ 10. Approximate plan and profiles of propose sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on/the plans o 11 . Plan of the proposed water distributior(system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydr is ❑ 12. Approximate centerline profiles sh wing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a asonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of prop ed street right-of-way(s) o 14. The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow 0 15. Location, width & directio/of flow of all water courses & drainage-ways 0 16. The proposed lot configurations, approximate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where to;sure to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be)ndicated upon such lots. o 17. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings o 18. The existing uses of the property, including the location of all structures and the present/uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ 19. Supplemen I information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) o (b) P oof of property ownership ❑ (c) proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands & marsh areas ❑ 21 . If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION./UST PAGE 4 OF 5 • J) Solar Access Calculations: K) Other Information No. of Copies ❑ h:Vogin\patty\rnastersUticl ist.mst May 23,1995 LAND USE APPLICATION./LIST PAGE 5 OF 3 • PRE,.APPLICATION CONFER CE H TES- t ,, ClglafTigard,` g e ENGINEERING:SECTION: , „ ;p f f i!L'�Gf WJJLUJK 3 ,'fin PUBLIC FACILITIES 5 Zoc2 The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: 1, -usT t. lL? (1.) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions. (2.) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns. (3.) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-wav dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: (✓j Sv■1 nt. Ac- `S(. to feet from centerline C % ?- ( @ P..ADruS Dszwss (v(Ast4 / Reevain1c.7 to 3o feet ftratweenterline. (vr Svc/ ev./tn14 5-1-• to V5 feet from centerline. Street improvements: ( ) street improvements will be necessary along ( ) street improvements will be necessary along ( ) Street improvements o shall include feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation . curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected i e : -rmined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be o uired to be wider on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), neces = street signs and traffic control devices, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. ( ) Street improvements on shall include - -t of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 5 Engineering Department Section utility wires (a fee me collected if determined appropriby the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sidew (sidewalks may be required to beWler on arterials or major collector . streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs and traffic control devices, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. ( 1,K Section 18.164.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW A Fwt l . Prior to fLt �� 4- P , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) • (2.) SIAJ RrAAANic7 Sr. Pedestrianways/bikeways: Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located in ,cr4 . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to PA r c ..cam_ LA-( <—C- -� 'C ►. ) A 64,-- t4.1(1. Water Supply: The 1`yip Water Cikgrkt - Phone:(503) Cog- * 1I provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 5 Engineering Department Section ' . - Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Biill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire Tu y ( ) protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. A downstream analysis will also likely be necessary to determine if runoff from the proposed development will cause adverse impacts to the existing storm system downstream of the site. ° PRWtl 0.9v4,1,krizt94 A An,1 /stS An)) ST*M P641./ "_I M P 4 .fc/r7(9/ Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City . maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. STORM WATER QUALITY The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ( ) Construction of an on-site water quality facility. (k)/ Payment of the fee in-lieu. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-ApplicatIon Conference Notes Page 3 of 5 Engineering Department Section TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES • • In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. /45‘i PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 5 Engineering Department Section • Site Improvement *nit (SIT). This permit is genera issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: .►� Imo/ 2111 ENGINEERING oEpanimENT STAFF Phone: [5031639-4171 Fax [503)684-7297 h:\patrylmaste rs\preapp.a ng (Master section:preapp-r.mst) 18-Nov-97 CITY OF TICARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 5 Engineering Department Section • • • Lauri Aldridge SW Frewing Street Tigard, r Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 620-3370 January 6, 1998 0 If Tigard City Building and Planning, RE: Map and Tax Lot - #2S i 02 CD, 200 I would like to subdivide the property located at 9640 SW Frewing Street, Tigard, OR, into 3 lots. Currently there is a large house that faces Frewing Street and the address is 9640 SW , Frewing Street. There is also a large duplex unit that faces Ash.Ave., the address there is 13510 C"�� SW Ash Ave. I would like to build a duplex on the corner lot with access from both Frewing P&P-1'4_14 (Ida rE7 Street and Ash Ave., extending from the current driveways into the proposed corner lot. V Tigard City was going to take 10 feet on each side of Ash Ave., for the purposes of widening the street. The neighborhood voted this action down since they were concerned about the street • traffic. Since then, Tigard City has decided to take 5 feet on each side of the street for sidewalks. Since the East side of Ash Ave. is developed property and affects at least three property owners, I would like to propose that Tigard City take the original 10 feet on the West side of Ash Street as previously decided and not any on the East side. • The reasons are: First, this decision would allow for sidewalks and proper setbacks from existing structures. Second, this decision would create a bend or curve in the road that would help slow down traffic, a major neighborhood concern. Third. the West side of the street is mainly undeveloped property and this decision would not affect the value of • the undeveloped or developed area or hurt the overall property in its current or future value. Sincerely, ri4e Lauri Del Aldridge • GeoNET Map • • Page 1 of 1 On Click*zoom In Zoom Out Wan OIdentify Taxlot Taxlots k r W IV r vi Street Names '* � �i Flood Plain �Atel —Plan Desig. ,��Devel Activi 1 � Activity imiiivo.:„4 UGB , • —Urban Reserves VIA. �Alt —Cities ���": � I Streets OAA '3 FL l cli1111111,lk Contours "+ _�....p'High Val Soils � h �t�� Air Photos 4111 Shaded Relief 160,ti ill Section Lines ,• I � . _ Refresh Map � � ILI'''. 11� County View . 111Maiiirl --- g MLP 90 -©0/1 1 4:20 PM Wednesday,February 18, 1998 • ..•:.. . .. . , 0 , , „:,.,...., i •..,..„... , • . .. • ..,I..... :4 .4:I I i•o•;' ••• , ., •,-.,--...,an:,...,. ... .iy.'..%$. <)f I i,•i i C i'‘ 0 i`..".•c '': ' '' ..4:::.,(.!‘:'*:t.N... :.••***11••••;*:..,:i5......A:. 1::::,••••::::::•„.:•;?-• r-----7--:,-.....;:j..!r<.*;....v..,'.....: . $.:....:::....4.........,.--.-'-`. II - ., :.41:: :. ., '...id'e. .'':.• * .' - of 1 ''''':' ..:t•ii .4'. .4').0111%;;',...1. ' ''''....:1Z.,...7::-,:'i:':: :.1.;..: ':t.",4-..z."...,11::i',..,i,,..tf,........ ..,..._- . . ....7,1.. ....... ....-,..:...4..;;;:...• ......-„.• ....•(*.:34-j)t,t* . .•....1::.1 • ":I . i 1,, : . _ ... ,•:".....*:..." •••••.••••:•••• .11.:..•::-••:;:kii..,44.4.4• 7"... i,..1i:ft:. •-.;. : ' :' •*•., i.,..: ." -.:. :: .,,:::.:::: .•,..........,...11 ' l':1;•••11::: • 4'.' —1...''....:. 1.'....".-::91.K.:,..V....:••.4'..:''... ::::'.-. t,4t....':'-: •:•••••• ';'..*: 1 .1 "..:..'••...:..;•••••.:::::•12...E•I''- • '•il'..;•''...\ ' :::,.....1•••••••. .. '—•'' .1 :.... • •• • •,.•' ' ,...; ' '.....4,.. . 71.."'''''' • , ' A..•i'••:•4:: * i [•••••' .' 'i••••••.'•::: -••Sk.::?'• " :4 x••• ' :,t ....4.• '•••2.'"ii 1 :• *'''''..••• '*!**::1'.-•••;•'..;4•1.1.1:::,...iP-..4c l'i-.-..------ ........A 4 .. .. . ...........•:•:444.:44.-A.- - -,,,,, 4.-. -44:44: -.1....e......_ --4:::-).4...,- -. •,'•.'.'4., .•':. 1 • .. .. :-...:•:,.....,....-..--:'ti..7..it4;-•21%. .,..!...k.7..:::::.• •• ..... ...%„, !.....i:z....;?..... ..,.. -.:-.„.i.,.....,. ..1 , .i..... ..,„:::.-4---., - .4....--1--. ,....0 - ----- .-4---:,----,1 „ ... ....: _. :z_., 4 -k .,......:.-:.;•••'-.: ", . -1/2••••'•••"1".. ••.:•'.:--i....::-.•••;;-.: • "• • • '-•--•--••=.:•.!::!-'4'.'1...- ...... •••••;?4,. "..i.....;:. - . '14.:•.:}..?•'......- ez;-' ----..--A .•.• . ... .-..;•.------•:: •.....•4,..' -•-`'. • °*: .7.. .' 1 1:-..--.--.'..,:::.•-;:;:..ti......r..,; ;:i....p.4•.;‘-....%.'..... :' ....-.. ...4..4,,:,1:24...;7.1„...1. -.:-.--- •.23.,•:,-;:.:•::,......•••...-1.1 -..•:-..,, ,,--.:-...4„,..t. ,..f...,.....:4,:."-•4'.-7-•:-.f..;;.... . ' : k.., . •••-• ii. • .- ;,....**.:.*-:••••'"- .:•:,..:::-:.• .1.,:: I-•'::!,:,......,-....--.......: .......c...f?,...,..11.:t*.... -1..,-..-,:f.i.......:,..-..;.,,.. .'..."10--il....... ..,:.....::? :,,, -. - ..._3t.t:'r* .......-.4 I:4 1,.,A.:•''?4::::::•••••••••••''' ..:•••51•:•!...i.:1•1:.S. -••I''''1.•7'. .. .7'.:.*:'.'1'*.'. • . •.• ■••l•' '• ...••• &., • *'* '•'.. .•••• '''' • ''' ••'•••'••'' i :: i ••••: • , .. •••:•,, I.••.•.'.: n•'• ••• " ••• ' '• '• .. 1 Hst /41 a<- • ti _.____ i?--415 ,0214t/q/ -e-hiSti . p7 _____ eufre.tf- /ZS ,01 e,t44A.— .-Arl---- - ---d47‘17--- — /1_____6-"t ' if-- .I'Lt•-e,0 os-e( _fr",,,, ,, i., i i . _ , a*� -44 -0- CA- — ' _ . . ! / , ~ , l�j «` 57( n cp, 2/3 �� . � , | - •• - | ) ' ! [----------- . � • iMLPJ99 — QQOIc , WITHDRAWN/ MAPS • • ,.., 20 7, ''. s \s / ' ti ti O. O. f',,,‘Z t". 0` ' \F <4‘ 'h•` / .j/A ' / s o ti A7 . - '; ./.'s / c: -.. / /• c\ • qq-,:`' . / 1• 0 p$k( e` 7 Y■ Q P tP ',), / ch/ C), ., tr � © � q"' N.gl; / /' -v--71-____25:76,..XI /q71 .'- A /1 P tb 4( / i'= (-7`4(. I .7, '-- O 4' , p a' ? O /n -L . y 4 Ct yP Q41 v 4 ) 4 <1‹.30 f 4p^ ,0 O O " Y3s 1(‘ \ .e \ T 4., ./Y'061 4'''OPri' / rVe O /O Q- �.* *÷ f�' Ci h CST -< -. . is,- . 11, / ,,,, \ i / `� ~Cn . � �•�' � fit' 4 � v ./A 4)1' Cr $ : \ S \ \ / A rvl. ` , \• `. / / ' ...\7,5 \\ \ so•4tr, •. , ,, A ,( t, • -�, , I G t ( * \ ate a SC \ \ 4J' d JS , a \ �0 \ \ t ki _ ' ,, - N s 0. ,2 s, . _ , , . ,,. , . ,.) , (11'' ' s0 bZ 2� 0. SCALE DRAWING TAX LOT 200, 2S 1W2CD � , S.W. 1/4 SEC. 2,T.2S., R.1 W., W.M. •� � 44 5 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON SEPTEMBER 13, 1999 ti Centerline Concepts Inc. c\ DRAWN BY: MSG CHECKED BY: WGDIII SCALE 1"=30' ACCOUNT #150-3623 640 82nd Drive Gladstone, Oregon 97027 • ..- M:\BND\BOND—JACKBOND\BONDSC 503 650-0188 fax 503 650-0189 • 91oS 1 t/117 zN/(3;272/--/ 3