Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
MLP1999-00013
AlLP19 .3c1 — 00013 CITY OF TIGARD Community Deveoopment Shaping Better Community rte;, ?r.:a,'r; °^.� :« y:A< x.; u 'aasY :..Ev •„ Pf v z✓ <': :: .ane =. ir'.Y ' USEJ,PROPOSALDESCRIPTI:ON .� s.•.x�.: :�- m..9..:m"".:�..:^? i:n..•%:, ;n."1•:. !_,a4'.3;,�,-d' 'a`."•'.;�P>:a<oa=a�'.;�. ._:i?,?.r' '.,'I:<..;�. X•?�u. �' s .r^ "5•,x:a.? 5a*..'� Y„ '•,1:,..a.. 2�.."k:..;� • 120 DAYS = 1/27/2000 FILE NO: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 1999-00013 FILE TITLE: ODOT 1-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION APPLICANT: Oregon Department of Transportation OWNER: Same 420 Transportation Building Salem, OR 97301 REQUEST: The owner of record of the subject property is requesting permission to allow a Minor Land Partition of State of Oregon owned right-of-way into one (I) parcel containing 41,311 square feet. LOCATION: The subject site is located in the NE and SE corner of SW Clinton Street and SW 6r Avenue; WCTM 151 36DD, 1-5 Right-of-Way. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The purpose.of the MUE zoning district is to create a mixed sue employment district to provide opportunities for employment and for new business and professional services in close proximity to retail centers and major transportation facilities, to provide for major retail goods and services accessible to the general public and minor retail goods and services accessible to the public which works and lives within the MUE district. APPLICABLE • REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.520, 18.190 and 18.810.. CIT AREA: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request • DECISION MAKING BODY: ❑ TYPE I © TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: OCTOBER 14, 1999 ❑ HEARINGS OFFICER IMONJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00PM ❑ PLANNING COMMISSION [MONJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30PM ❑ CITY COUNCIL 1TUESJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30PM ©. STAFF DECISION [TENTATIYEI DATE OF DECISION: NOVEMBER 12, 1999 L COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION © VICINITY MAP ❑ LANDSCAPING PLAN • ❑ TREE PLAN © SITE PLAN • ❑ ARCHITECTURAL PLAN ❑ TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY © NARRATIVE ❑ GEOTECH REPORT ❑ OTHER: • STAFF CONTACT: Matthew Scheidegger. Assistant Planner (503) 639-4171 Ext. 317 Route To: • Surveyor Development Review Engineer FINAL PLAT REVIEW CHECKLIST Plat Name: Pe,..11-Tcvirt Case Numb; (s) }h.? t9gq-ca,1 3 Address: C L14" Q51AJ (-4.-414re.t �7 (Do NOT re ease addresses to the public without consent of the Engineering Department.) Contact name and phone C TO x.-AND (ct&) 1S1 - (Fill in when plat is opped off) DATE RECEIVED: _ t 2 V 114 DATE FORWARDED TO SURVEY: 1 LI 1(q9 SURVEY SECTION Check if Check if Considered Okay 1. Street alignment and width,continuity 04/1' ❑ 2. Curve,corner,cul-de-sac radii r "iV i'� ❑ 3. Dedication, vacation,easement conveyance p)4Y R ❑ 4. Residential Survey Certificate match the map Comments: By: --Z-O- ► • ' /� /--13-97 Surveyor's Signature Date Page 1 of 1 I:EIJGPAJV-DEV■Fw-R.AT.DOT • • Route To: 1. Planning 2. Building 3. Engineering Tech I 4. Development Review Engineer ✓ FINAL PLAT REVIEW CHECKLIST Plat Name: CX)-1-- Case Number(s) 'p44' lRgq - 000t t DATE RECEIVED: 1t-- DATE FORWARDED TO PLANNING: 11-(1 lic‘ To: )• S. Planning Division Check if Check if Considered Okay 1. Phase boundaries E' • 2. Lot and/or tract size and configuration 3. Lot numbers 122 4. Access restrictions, reserve strips 5. Condition of Approval Satisfied ❑ Lt 6. Public&Private streets (location, width, etc....,) CI 12/ 7. Preliminary Plat approval date- 1 yr period OK ❑ [✓/ 8. Special Deed Restrictions(C.C.&R's) [i 9. Open Space (Deed or Dedication) L gar • 10. SPECIAL SETBACKS ARE 11. Assign Case Number(above) • L] Other Comments: By: /4..id.a;10-__%__ c7 70 9 9 P1. e' s Sig ature ate FORWARDED TO BUILDING DIVISION: Date Page l of 4 I.IENOPRIV-DEVIFIN-FIAT DOT ` r • • BUILDING DIVISION Comments: / Building Dept. Signature Date FORWARD TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (Attn.:Engineering Tech/Engineering Records) / L- —/ Date ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (Engineering Tech) Check if Okay Street Names Acceptable gyt . Manhole Numbers ❑ Assign Address(s) - (front page) [T Address Fee(URB Projects Only): ) lots @$30.00/lot=$ = P-' Update City-wide maps ❑ Comments: • By: _4_,./ je:2—&--99 Engineering Tech's Signature Date FORWARDED TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ENGINEER Page 2, of 4 I EN4\Perv-DENFIN-PLAT.DoT • ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Check if Okay Public Improvement Plans Approvable/Approved Public Improvement Fees/Deposits Right-of Entry, Release& Waivers, Easement (onsite - offsite) Public Improvement Agreement Public Improvement Assurance U Conditions of Approval Satisfied? Sewer Availability Letter Prepared ❑ Joint Access,Non-Remonstrance Agreement LI Comments: By: Development Review Engineer's Signature Date Page 3 of 4 I:rFN(TPW V-DENFIN-PLAT.DOT • • • Co D Returned to Surveyor for Correction BY: fia- DATE: 1 I two Fax to County Surveyor: "OK to review" BY: 0-- DATE: I I I L( 2. Corrections Reviewed and Approved BY: DATE: '1( °I ( . Forwarded for City Signatures BY: DATE: • Copy of Signed Plat Made and Put in File BY: DATE: Released to Developer for Recording BY: DATE: Authorize Eng. Tech I to release addresses BY: Date: Copy of Signed Plat to DST's BY: Date: Page 4 of 4 FEN WR1V-0ENAFw-pLAT.arF • • • • epta 0 ie. ;. �, viii ter' - Liz Surveying, Inc. (� . • DATE: 3- 3 ` APR Qpp� 6 ?Coo To: mu�iry°ctfcv�,v,,. Attn: )fL 75- 61---70 Fax No: From: Wolf Surveying Inc. Subject: You should receive pages including this cover sheet. If you should not receive all pages please call 618-0564. Comments: (1 I T2= D Vince Wolf2\my documents\faxcoverbw.doc STEVEN L. MUMA, PLS JOE H. FERGUSON, PLS PAUL J. MORIN, PLS LAWRENCE D. HART, PLS 18438 SE Pine St., Portland, Oregon 97233 Ph. (503)618-0564 Fax(503)665-1503 www.ipns/wolfsurveying �o • • IF L s.:d IIIIregcn Department of Transportation 'N "�' Region 1 Right of Way John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.,Governor 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97209 Phone: 731-8400 FAX: 731-8458 FILE'• OD&, � f�' n 1.1V INovember 30, 1999 � IC • VAN 20 2000 • Brian Rager File 19575 City of Tigard Planning Division N. Tigard-S. Tigard Intch. 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97223 Washington County RE: MLP 1999-00013 • Dear Brian; I am submitting for your examination, according to the Conditions of Approval under the above land use action, 3 paper copies of the Plat and narrative of survey for an ODOT parcel in West Portland Heights. I also enclose a check for a $30 addressing fee as required by these conditions. Very truly yours, Carl Toland Right of Way Agent i1.��a� C � ,g, _,,d- O Dv T 2r-frt. 44vAiriraw.e.0/ Cc Wolf Surveying Inc. 11)/"1 3 • Rit -A1ea-VA .4_,(44-c. Q rte-_ 4 �$ .,, d 4 � � /1/I,,4 41Xpy-4-1 -ref.-tavv-10. "kb` Form 734-1866(10/97) (24tzeD • • FAX TRANSMITTAL A/iyiy#41,��i$ 1 A f�AA t=sa Date January 12, 2000 Number of pages including cover sheet 1 To: George Wiser From: Brian Rager WACO Surveyor's Office Co: City of Tigard Fax#: 846-2909 Fax#: 624-0752 Ph #: 639-4171, Ext. 318 SUBJECT: MLP 1999-00013, ODOT Partition • MESSAGE: We have completed review of this plat and there are no public improvements associated with it. Please put in line for your review. I:IENGFAX.DOT HP OfficeJet Fax History Report for Personal Printer/Fax/Copier/Scanner Engineering 624 0752 Jan 12 2000 5:15pm Last Fax Date Time Type Identification Duration Pages Result Jan 12 5:15pm Sent 8462909 0:26 1 OK Result: OK - black and white fax OK color - color fax • � I of--; • • / � Department of Transportation 11* regon Region 1 Right of Way 123 NW Flanders l g John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.,Governor 1[5) (� Portland,OR 97209 �; a � � E n Phone: 731-8400 \. U FAX: 731-8458 — DEC 01 AM FILE CODE: Ca ►. November 30, 1999 ( O TIGARD Brian Rager File 19575 City of Tigard Planning Division N. Tigard—S. Tigard Intch. 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97223 Washington County RE: MLP 1999—00013 Dear Brian; I am submitting for your examination, according to the Conditions of Approval under the above land use action, 3 paper copies of the Plat and narrative o • • '- • - ODOT parcel in West Portland Heights. I also enclose a check for a $30 -=-•ressing fee :, req ' ed by these conditions. Ve truly y• . gvsj(G'43 / ► / lc� Carl bland �a - Right of Way Agent Cc Wolf Surveying Inc. Form 734-1866(10/97) "r - • NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION : A MINOR LAND PARTITION IMLPI 1999-00013 CITY OF TIGARD Community Development ODOT I-5 RIGHT-OF WAY PARTITION _ pug A Better Community 120 DAYS = 01/27/00 • SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: ODOT I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION CASE NO.: Minor Land Partition MLP1999-00013 PROPOSAL: The owner of the subject property is requesting permission to allow a Minor Land Partition of State of Oregon owned right-of-way into one (1) parcel containing 41,311 square feet. APPLICANT/ OWNER Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) 420 Transportation Building Salem, OR 97301 ZONING DESIGNATION: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to create a mixed sue employment district to provide opportunities for employment and for new business and professional services in close proximity to retail centers and major transportation facilities, to provide for major retail goods and services accessible to the general public and minor retail goods and services accessible to the public which works and lives within the MUE district. LOCATION: The subject site is located in the NE and SE corner of SW Clinton Street and SW 67th Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, 1-5 Right-of-Way. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.520, 18.620, 18.790 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION N otice is hereby given=that the City of Tigard-Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions The findings and conclusions on which the decision n:is:based:are noted in Section V. NOTICE OF DECISION ODOT/I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION-MLP1999-00013 PAGE 1 OF 10 • • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PARTITION PLAT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE' ATI _SATISFIED: Submit the following to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager 639-4171 x318) for review and approval: 1. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30. 2. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Submit for City review three paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. C. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive a letter from the City Engineering Department indicating: 1) that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor, and 2) that the applicant has either completed any public improvements associated with the project, or has at least obtained the necessary public improvement permit from the City to complete the work. D. Once the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two Mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer's signature. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED.WITHIN EIGHTEEN(18) MONTHS OF THE FIN AL DECISION DATE NOTEDUNDER ;,..THE PROCESS:AND:APPEAL SECTION OFTHIS;DECI$ION: :.: ;: :_ • SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Property History and Proposal Description: The subject site consists of excess right-of-way that was purchased by the State of Oregon in 1953 for various configurations of the SW Clinton Street (now Haines Road) connection to 1-5 southbound. ODOT seeks to partition a portion of the excess right-of-way to be sold at future auction. NOTICE OF DECISION ODOT/I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION-MLP1999-00013 PAGE 2 OF 10 • • Site Information: This parcel of land does not presently exist as a tax lot. It is loosely defined as lying south of a newly established line that was created by a Lot Line Adjustment action (MIS 1999-00008); east of the eastern right-of-way line of SW 67th Avenue and northwest of the ODOT right-of-way fence along the present Haines Road southbound off-ramp. It• also includes a portion of SW Clinton Street that was vacated by an Ordinance of the City of Tigard recorded at Washington County, Book 340, Page 286. SECTION IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS No public comments were received. SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS FOR A MINOR LAND PARTITION GENERAL APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.420.050 contains the following general approval criteria for a Minor Land Partition: A request to partition land shall meet all of the following criteria: The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; The proposal conforms with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations as demonstrated both by the analysis presented within this administrative decision, and through compliance with conditions imposed as part of this application and review process. There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal; Streets, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water and electricity are available to serve the lot. Therefore, this criterion has been met. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards; and All proposed improvements meet or will be conditioned to meet, City and applicable agency standards. All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements listed in the next section; The Specific requirements are discussed and conditioned if necessary further in this decision. NOTICE OF DECISION ODOT/I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION-MLP1999-00013 PAGE 3 OF 10 • • • Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress, and Circulation. The access to the parcel is deferred until time of development, therefore, this standard does not apply. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one- hundred-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. The subject site is not within a floodplain, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: As proposed, all of the Land Partition Approval Criteria have been fully satisfied or will be applied during the time of building permit review for structures on the parcel. SPECIFIC PARTITION APPROVAL CRITERIA The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. The lot width required for the MUE zone is 50 feet. The width at the shortest point of the lot is 211 feet. Therefore, Staff finds that this standard is satisfied. The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation. There are three allowable lot sizes available in the MUE zone. Detached Units have a minimum of 1 ,480 square feet; Boarding, Lodging and Rooming Houses have a minimum of 6,1. 00 square feet; and Commercial Development has no minimum lot size. The proposed partition is approximately 41,311 square feet. Therefore, this criterion is met. • Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The proposed parcel has approximately 260 lineal feet of frontage along SW 67th Avenue. Therefore, this standard has been met. Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. NOTICE OF DECISION ODOT/I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION- MLP1999-00013 PAGE 4 OF 10 • • The following table lists the dimensional standards in the MUE zone: TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES • MUE R-25 STANDARD C-G MF DU* Minimum Lot Size None - -Detached unit - 1,480 sq ft -Boarding,lodging,rooming house - 6,100 sq ft Minimum Lot Width 50 ft None Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 0 ft[6] 20 ft -Side facing street on corner& - 20 ft through lots[1] -Side yard 0/20ft[3] 10ft -Side or rear yard abutting more - 30 ft restrictive zoning district -Rear yard 0/20 ft[3] 20 ft -Distance between front of garage& - 20 ft property line abutting a public or private street. Maximum height 45 ft 45 ft Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% 80%[11] Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 20% • [1] The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3] No setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [4] See Section 18.520.050B for site and building design standards. [5] No front yard setback shall be required,except a 20 foot front yard setback shall apply within 50 feet of a residential district. [6] There shall be no minimum front yard setback requirement;however,conditions in Chapters 18.745 and 18.795 must be met. [7] There are no setback requirements,except 30 feet where a commercial use within a district abuts a residential zoning district. [8] The maximum height of any building in the CBD zone within 100 feet of any residential zoning district shall not exceed 40 feet. [9] Where the side or rear yard of attached or multiple-family dwellings abut a more restrictive zoning district,such setbacks shall not be less than 35 feet. [10] Landscaped areas on existing developed property in the CBD shall be retained. Buffering and screening requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745 shall be met for existing and new development. [11] Lot coverage includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. *Multiple-family dwelling unit C-N-Neighborhood Commercial District C-C-Community Commercial District C-G-General Commercial District C-P-Professional/Administrative Office Commercial CBD-Central Business District Compliance for structures on the proposed parcel will be reviewed during the building permit phase on the lot. Based on the lot size and dimensions, staff feels it is reasonable that structures can be placed on the lot in accordance with these setbacks. NOTICE OF DECISION ODOT/[-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION-MLP1999-00013 PAGE 5 OF 10 • • • When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. The proposed parcel is not a flag lot. Therefore, this standard does not apply. A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. This standard does not apply because it is not a flag lot. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities. This standard does not apply because it is not a flag lot. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. The applicant is only proposing to create one lot, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, all of the specific approval standards have either been met or are deferred until time of development. ADDITIONAL APPLICABLE STANDARDS 18.790.030 Tree Removal Plan: A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. The tree plan shall include the following: • Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. NOTICE OF DECISION ODOT/I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION-MLP1999-00013 PAGE 6 OF 10 • • Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D, in accordance with the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: a. Retention of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program in accordance with Section 18.790.060D of no net loss of trees; b. Retention of from 25% to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060.D; c. Retention of from 50% to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060.D; . d. Retention of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation. • Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; • A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant did not submit a tree removal plan for proposed parcel. The site plan indicates that there are trees on the site, however, tree removal and mitigation will be required as part of SDR. Therefore, this standard can be deferred until time of development. Chapter 18.620 -Tigard Triangle Design Standards: These standards are deferred until the time of development. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS Streets: Tigard Development Code (TDC) Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. TDC Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. NOTICE OF DECISION ODOT/I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION-MLP1999-00013 PAGE 7 OF 10 • • This site abuts SW 67th Avenue and SW Clinton Street. If and when this site is ever developed, street improvements will be required at that time. The proposed partition does not warrant improvements at this time. There is adequate right-of-way (ROW) on both streets to meet the Tigard Triangle Design Standards, so additional dedications are not necessary. • Water: This site is located within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. The partition does not warrant public water line improvements. Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing public sanitary sewer line located in SW 67th Avenue that can serve this site if it is developed in the future. No sewer improvements are necessary as a result of the partition. Storm Drainage: A complete onsite storm drainage plan, along with onsite detention, will be necessary if this site is developed in the future. No storm drainage improvements are necessary as a result of the partition. Storm Water Quality: Not applicable for this partition. Grading and Erosion Control: Not applicable for this partition. Existing Overhead Utility Lines: There are existing overhead utility lines adjacent to SW 67th Avenue. Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in-lieu is proposed by the future developer of this site, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is approximately 264 lineal feet; therefore, the fee would be approximately $7,260. NOTE: this fee would only be collected if this site is developed in the future and the overhead lines were not placed underground. NOTICE OF DECISION ° ODOT/I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION-MLP1999-00013 PAGE 8 OF 10 ` • • • • Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to recording of the final plat. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30. SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Operations Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency, Washington County, General Telephone, NW Natural Gas, Portland General Electric, TCI Cable and US West have all had the opportunity to review the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION • Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON NOVEMBER 17, 1999 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON DECEMBER 4, 1999 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. NOTICE OF DECISION ODOT/I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION-MLP1999-00013 PAGE 9 OF 10 • • • Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE;°DEADLINE°'FOR;=FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 330:PM:'ON°DECEMBER 3;i1999:-. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. /.40 i .��i��!r ' November 17, 1999 PREPARED BY: a • -w Scheid:• •,-r DATE Assistant Planner Mfg November 17, 1999 APPROVE i BY: Ric and Bewersd•'� DATE Planning Manager I: NOTICE OF DECISION ODOT/I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION-MLP1999-00013 PAGE 10 OF 10 (oleos o;;ou s!dew) m 2 y GO nut E z ODOT 1-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION £1000-6661d1W ,62 09'2h 1 a3Na00 10076. 031v7037v3 31-11 MOa! 06'62 M 22•Of 5 Oa033a oN al..9/S 3..00.00,0 N CH n P" 09 —I 0 z m m —I • g IN3R'3nvd JO 3003 V 33,9%3Ndd�/ 3.00,00.00 S Of'0 3 Or! 5 lhlbf NS) L'0 NNW dl 60'0 M ££'O N 11,16£N5) 135 8'0 NINJO dl.2/1 r L L � I 100813 NS) I I ..3W!ONLA3fAO5 d70M.314.M 311N3AY H.L9 MS • L / / /I at H WIN r I 100920 NS) ..INI^NIA3AdO5 J7OM.0dA/M al..9/5 -I- •cr i rn 0 n\ SJ N•� ti b I Y d\I- - _ - 00'09 ^^\-» ` 'J L th I- L I (S'I) S 31VJSH31NI 00.521 _ fmVQ N!D Wag WOW ONNY38 A sins (f6661 NS) • ..00SSV 9 a3d000,.IdA/M a/..9/S CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION . CITY of•.VAARD r 7 1 . . GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM / VICINITY MAP MLP1999-00013 \ _ i _► A ST O.D.O.T. - I-5 AO RIGHT-OF-WAY i W PARTITION / r BAYLOR ST a d . i ' [..0" -Z CLINTON - I ST ~ Approximate Area of Partition Reques x DARTMOUTH ST N . 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet 1"=378 feat 6 " City of Tigard 1 �MHY T ST I Information on this map is for general location only and • h should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd _ Tigard,OR 07223 • .. T- I (503)639.4171 i-- hltp:/Awow.ci.tigard.or.us Plot date:Sep 30, 1999;CAmc\M agiAGIC03.APR Community Development • 1ON . A A MINOR LAND PARTITION .(MLP) -1=9.99-00013 : ODOT 1-5.°RIGHT=OF-WAY PARTITION Coinmun OF vclopmenf Shaping;A;Better Community 120 DAYS = 01/27/00 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: ODOT I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION CASE NO.: Minor Land Partition MLP1999-00013 PROPOSAL: The owner of the subject property is requesting permission to allow a Minor Land Partition of State of Oregon owned right-of-way into one (1) parcel containing 41,311 square feet. APPLICANT/ OWNER Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) 420 Transportation Building Salem, OR 97301 ZONING DESIGNATION: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to create a mixed sue employment district to provide opportunities for employment and for new business and professional services in close proximity to retail centers and major transportation facilities, to provide for major retail goods and services accessible to the general public and minor retail goods and services accessible to the public which works and lives within the MUE district. LOCATION: The subject site is located in the NE and SE corner of SW Clinton Street and SW 67th Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, 1-5 Right-of-Way. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.520, 18.620, 18.790 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given=that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's" designee has APPROVED the above request: The findings and conclusions on• which the decision is based are noted in;Section<IVof.the full': decision: THIS APPROVAL"SHALL BE>VALI1 1 FOR`:' 8 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION s. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: 09 tice mailed to: X The applicant and owners Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL:ON NOVEMBER17,4999 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON DECEMBER 4,;1999,UNLESS,AN'APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: nA-y party to the decision ri appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code that provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within ten (10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the P anning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR=FILING OF AN'�APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON`DECEMBER 3, 1999. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. ti m t ii c i l m 1 --`mss, µii 1 e_ x 's''( - -1 O _,c ..... > * M1:i a. . . n .. as K 0 --4 (9 \\.\nm`1•°. r S, '5e, ,1 a Z AI 7 l� . Q was n) -a , -'- - N J SW CLINTON STREET l e e J t o [] e — I III — — J..– i Q Rai 'II Eq z u- s R° (7 f '1- A le - - ---- SITE PLAN t MLPI999-00013 EXHIBIT MAP N . ODOT 1-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION (mach not to sale) V;71 H \ I 1 I VICINITY MAP 1 [\' MLP 1999-00013 O.D.O.T. - 1-5 1---- V , . 111/1111111: AN, ST RIGHT-OF-WAY =.,' MN �P PARTITION 1111111111. 1 11-L-11' � , , Approximate Area of Partition Reques. --IHhlI1 N DARTMOUTH ST • � - si•n.n - 11111 City of T ..........arr-nw i 1 1 MI T ..ra..a.r..�o PM GO.N.uw > -1I I .....s : � ! i w sa•:a.r j c5 w -s + d , 4,,.,,,,!:, . ,,„d,, . :: _f:"'.- b o f.2.q o at �I = < �� , Ip' a s. o T!3:m S aSN pg\ } 1.- 11 {c: E E..,F F u O C! ' MV mt- L h. V a VV 1 n w V 1 B /n�13 },.:.: „>'.+'.rs:>:.s'.>::�;i>s:i;;i:iv .::w<i% n:}::.:.e..:....:.v4-.:.:.:..�x:..:.::.::}v{::•:::..:::iN.:....Z,:'�:Y'�..:ro...:.:tv.v•'..':.:..-'•..::n:...�-:.:::>.:;.:.'..::(:...:..:•....:..:..:.::.:..:...w:.::-.�....:.::.:,i.o.Y i:.::.i...�:,..i.:>x....:.i.:.\:.'...::.::::•:ss\�.:�.:..:..::.:.'::.:.i..:::.:;:.n.'.}�:..,.;•...:.Y..-wi.`::.:.a..G.:.:�::::_.�..4 L:::.f:::..,v:.#\v:::a.}.;::..te.�.;:,,...::.r:..:.:..w:.::..v:.•.:.:.�...:..:::-«}.v:.:...:::'.k•.::::>.:..:::,....;::.:.:ti?...._:...:.:.:;c....::.:i,:.:.::�.�.:::.:.::...::}.:.::..:�:.:::.?.....:.-.:::.:•.:.n.>.r.::i...v.h..-i::..{..#v.:.v,:'....:.::.::.:::..n.a:::.:Ss::..::}o:...:..::r J fo'..v..Y�•.:i..i..h..:,�f+..:.:..;:•.::.. ,:�..::..,:>.::.:.}v.:�:..:i-....{.:..:.�.::�.n:.t:...._:d.•F'.;.::...,:.:\.R.:\::..:.::.,1�n..::._:.:::..:..:.:.,.::.U:.:.....:.:...::.:.+.:.....:nh.S.�:\.{..\.:..�`V.••.:...:;E.d.,}......•'...3:..::i:. .}«.;:�.:,_i.t.;::t.:....:}:f:'.:..:\::L?.:.?\.:?\.•::..;':..:'::�T.:.\':..�::v:�::�:.)�::�...:t...\.:..,::"�::(.Td.•:,y:�:.3:v•:.r.:::�.,D.r..:#.v:�ro�v<:.�,.\:.i:'..-::.i.lU:r::v.r:.::\:...?:\:.:..::.';:..;`._;:.-.::.v;:..i-h.�:.:..;:n....:d;...::..;.:v.....:.:,:.:.:..:......::..:::.i:n:,n.:ia�Ya.:'v.4 x..i.t;r:v..i�:.dd v:.:.�.::�t..::-.-v:>>.a;::.«v:.W.i:...�:}Y...v.::.. :...:.�3:::.F•:.:...:..�.:...:::...o-.::...:.+:M1\.'.:.:.:Y v::....:..v:.::.Y}.::_::.+:.;:...:.:.::i.:.:,�.�.it'....":>S«..n:.:.:r:::.•:;c,.i,::i.t,:+.,.4v.v..:i:..::i::..�♦:.`S:F:.S..n...#:,:}:i:::+.:i•: }:::.,;•v,:.:Y.h..l av:#�.,._.. ;::.•f..:..'.'.:�:�:.'..tv:.:.,.t:,3!:.Yr:.:.• }.::.:::i i::::}::::;.i:;.`:{:::::.•;Y�:...::::.•::}ih}::\':>: n}••.\,::Y.':.`:w•.>:..�":v:+:is.•+•:i>:x:}�i�. ;r >c'•::?i�.'i:Y kil.'f:2+ ,...:::v:Y.:s-.:.r:r,{:::r:•,:::::.n:a v•• •::':vi:i { v...<v:::F::::•f/:>y.f::s>v: ;-• f .<i n � ?.:'.rrS•r:'�.y/A .:: Y ''';:.' :,.::: � 3 3+ - ' .:c ✓IX:n:''::�4Fi:/f:��.F l.:v: v:.Y i! 4b M: a Tt..f' : wik�•' ` r /y�y s .. fir ... � :'%r:.. :;. .':• .';.i•:-.o•. r:. '< ' v:6 P? :::., �ad•a\ ; : ,si . ..::: .S ::R< 1(1 i �a4:'.':-: :;.,'. .i i�::::. t~'?k � " • .:,.-. ' .,.tt.• .�.v!::»:^iS .::: -ti�:.{4:: : 1. \vr�s+ ' cf,{~. h ::-.n• .,: '.: : ,, ?:::}r ::>0, ....... ::' :� ::::i::.::.:3{ : :::' /ip,J}��>:i:::�,Y:r\\ �, i : .! 4:.: r..n :,} r. ....>i n .. r .....:.v.i.x}.N. .v;v}„, � :v .:,:Sr.vY�:.<::.:..::.::i.:.:::::::: :• :•. ��kh 1 a .:;kf-.'3. .,og$k4., ::::.::,.x.,:.,„;,,,;::::.:...• .......!,:.:..,{} .-.:.{-,:.,.,4...+{ 3 v •..•}•• ' .. .. ... kr n x#.}.}.i.i..: F+.. :. nv. ... . .. s " \+':}..:: ./• . <• .. a� h\.....a:,:v,vv v h{, . . . .... !v: .t..F . \\.;: `: a•:',i�l:<�i":�} r: i : a w: 1w.v.v: .t .v .. �; ..\.�. .G yay '�,ti•� �ti . v; :3• •. C: ' :S � :a j :{k:!<;�f:.;::.. .. r.:....:.::::....:..:..:. ::.:.:.::.: i: :. . l:: : .: '>.>.':.:•:g•':n:.; W h \ , ...._ vv:"% Jmhn : ii:.;:. .�.t%:::>I::::':::-, ..S}:....v n::.:...r3 \.>w";�N4h n ? ` rn.,. ... ......r .r,.., l .0. . .: ::'v m ."':k..,. ..f'is:;`>,: G . ..... r.�. :7 ! :. f .......:.?s.....:. ; ::..:.:.?..}i.:..:..::::....?.:s.:.:. s.:..is.:.:. ................. h , T .. •. „v•:v.h #: ,.<..4. ....r..�.... .: N ' : r 3ii1:: :::.. !: n•..r.........:.::...;•..>:..s.:.:.:............................... ...... ..... .. .:. ....:::s♦,•: ,•} n\:::h.vk ,V. , L.... ' . .v:r;Y •Y}J•h'.::nt.'..'.i:.....a:..v.rx:.,+:{n',a}.;.t ...{..?v..:::ny:::::::::......... ... ... .. . .. ... ... .....\...........v . \. \..,..;v', ,,'fh, ,.,. 4.v:•v,....:.....i........Y-.:-... ... ro: W.0: .::w:. .:n•v:':.v.:.:::v:..v:.% ::.:::n::v9.:::::.::::T4 •i!%'t;{{:Y' ;: ::i.\�...\ .\\.A.�\.O, A \ \ ):V .. .. ..........................................:.n..v.....:....:.::...:..•.:..:........•..:..::......-::..::....:n;....,..:..:.... .n vn.::•.t .i.?:.i.vi.-}'.:: .i..i: v v :.,,:.: " : ,. . ...h: "ss•n:.:.:.:..... :. ........ :::.:..vv::: •.:...:.:........................:......:..v......:..:::..:.:....n.•.:.n�.•:::.vzv c y`.;t!,':..::m :.;.w.. .*m ........r... ...f ,.;v :.:n%;;: .. : •• 4::•}}:nttii}.;Yt{.Y::... .........:...;...:. . ni.:-.... .........:.....�..........:..:..:::.:...:,.. ::rr.:::.4Ct... - ,.;fi;. L .}�...,,,. ,+Yn.Y: ;}:•Yi:•>:::•YY>.:.s.. .:.. . . ' :> } •:•:.}-}si•-}:•::?•; �:i>is:-s:-::;%-:i:::;�:;:':;>:;'.:%::.::;:;•ii.Yn }nv : ::•.::.:.::::v .v.:t �...v ....,.ri O •` � +G.c\ . 4 '''n4 & i,-YYY}YY:;;•:s}i:;•}}:ii - :..,:E%:E:: %:::%>• i? :';!:t:ir:':•:s:;:{:;;::;{:;:;.{{:::;.:. : yYki Z}\.\; +, a• h ,.a.,*a� �r�. , - ::: ::.. ::::::-::: : :%':'::: #F'i: :: :::.:::; .k2::.ti ::::.nb.-; : : ' ;y::i:iii' , �r v } :> :. :.. , - ...........:.::::.:::::.:..�. ,.. ::: :?::?::< ;tss:::riis Ex ,UdY \ n;3},JyR . n::::::iQ:: f^i!'.':F y-d:o-4!':`:i: :{.n�.:. 't}�:i Pv ,............... . ::: :•..::::: . 4 \\ h\�\\\` \:.�:k ,,.,............ ::::: :iii:. „l „C�:xf{.-Fl,f, . i:i%..;;:!!r':::::i�:::i::i;:::::::s.i} 2.:.. Y} o. . . .. ............. .. .......:....:...:.. K .:{ .-: � br>:.v : �r •9+.r. r di ...• a•;;;}:\>>,:. :::::::i:::F;.� :::.:.t: :•nom, . h .t. PT v * } 44 }:. .• ' %a' ku � .k : : !” '.::.•/Fr tv 'a/ .....!,, . ,..... :ax:;::. R :...v... .i . ^. .:.:vk ..... . .....:.. .t,.. :.. r�,.........{ : ... . `����27r $ ` ::s .•{/. /i , ✓ Yyio v:, n.• v 2' t ........: .. . m.t...v ,. . : £$x .......::_:....:.:.:.:>i::} v4: n . :1 A • •? '/''i' 9k2k : i.,:;;i-`:. ... ..�......... :.. ....:.:...: . . \hh A.> ; , . r .:.:: . n :{ ii.; ...i..::i: ::: :.: .:. i !J ....:. •:.., :}.:-.: . .. : .:.:..:.::.,,.. ....x.. r ......i:.>..i..::.::: .: ..: : d H ! , � V/ ?:sv n i ..:. .a... . . : ..... ..... ............ .... . .. F „ ilk fi g{t . .... >.. + # a ' , r. C1 : •;. .f " ii G i i ; �Y Y,.rf : 8 :..... r:.f� ::':'�: .: gf u r '" . }ry :r.n. ......: y f ' ..::.:: .:. A... :: ' Y : .i r. 3Y:::::::::4::::::..:::::::::::::.:::::,..::::::-.....:i;'•i i}x.ak4 • n ��: :is ... }r,.,....: .� : . . ..�.�::?i'. : ..:�:.�:::.: } : ftryr r 1\. ... :n. . 4 . 6L,r; x}f Y - � / n 54: :.,•:•:. G ::p:'{{i;i;i; : Y .... •,�,$. ' C �•'%:: •. f r SG P d1 s ...! t�kn . i; ; i : Y'2 f.F. N 4 a `,r: ,r>rtfi : . .. . ..> : : x.:n : 4 ;»v ff• a ; w`t .t g %'??;;k$a�Aty :KiryF . � t 9 ! 3l:. . • :..�� y:a✓ ' �. �r¢ ` 'x}{:. S y ,4.,..k. .,.;.k., .,, a..,... ,_ , -• ' . ': :•i :ii>::•:•SM:rYi.:,::::::•:..-. 0`.:?<>%s'.......,:.:...: .:. :::.::: :* .. ... .. ..: ..... :.:.: :...:........... •}Y } :g?•!?•Y:;a•}:•i.::::: i CC. > .:::: :::: . b : ..: . ..:::>{.;, nT -. ... t vWf r>}: >. . . ...r .. Ct # ..• i.. .i..,•: � ....:./ : .$ i yk �i i•E:::::::......: : ::... v: : :v4 ..: . < :r;.;i .' .3.# ...... .: •. M.::..: / ^ :: .. [ : :::i A t M : hK> f ii ; : r iM n%h . r .:'.: ..... :.. ^;G} h ":.. }7{•r-rai{ {# r: : t :p� } '>r • it4. x,.•k•:nt}; 3}x• « {n +.: y 1�, ..: i :.:.: : a .a::...... ... ..... :":. . .......t-v,. v:Jvfv:: :•:... .. v.•:•i............:........ . . [ . �a...::;. ttiii.:. .r ....v.....:.... .....:: i . ; .: ..:: ::v hr. r 9••.:::::::?...:....:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::.::::::::::::.......:::..::::::::::::::::::•::::::::.....:.:::::::„...:!.::::„...1!.......,...,,......:: • .• • •...... ...:.... . 5.ffi' .. :.: tr • _ • S PARTITION PLAT NO. RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. ImEmmt..... IIVTERSTATE 5 .., IN BLOCK 7 AND BLOCK 14 WEST PORT / S.E. 1/4 SEC. 36, T. 1 S., R. 1 W., = 30' 3 0 4 5 CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY 100.75 , • ' S 5°02'16" 1/1/ ac Lc) N s c-S. •/8 / in kfr N , 0 0° ?•-) 60.00 .) .9 -7,- BLOCK 7 • c) / • cr) HELD v) N- C G cl c\I \x/\C- <9 5/8" IR Cs., o ..s.' 6 --9 \.) L-LI I-- • ....,0 se. W/YPC "COOPER & ASSOC." i- CD 93N- BASIS OF BEARING (SN 19943) - rq "V\V - 'L 250.00 SOUTH (SN 27800) / — --- — — — 125.00 • 's 38.15 / —1 • 0 '40 • , 1 .:1-- • N 00°00'00" E IN_ co N 00°00'00" E 5/8" IR A -. -. , Ix) co N W/YPC "WOLF SURVEYING INC" s s / BLOCK 14 (SN 27800) o s-3 • / 3?- s--3 \ / L9 / - - 3 ‘c-C1 LU / / • : c'c) / / P \ 0 / / 0 d ° 0 i cz 0 / / 00 cp p / / .C3 01 / • OTh CY' cp (i) / / z ----_) / / CA / 1/2" IP DOWN 0.8 3/4" IP DOWN 0.7 _. o <<.z 5/8" IR / /// o -... ?2, SEE (SN 3414) (SN 3414) • W/YPC "WOLF SURVEYING INC" // N 0.33 W 0.09 I S .1.30 E 0.30 (SN 27800) 7 I 163.15 • -- 7 61.85 60.00 142.60 fir------/ I 0 • S 00°00'00" E ,-4 KI 1 264.45 IN 0°00'00" E -- -_-,--c-Of / ) I NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOR,VENDOR OR SELLER: S THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION MINOR LAND PARTITION CITY OF TIGARD Community Deveropment Shaping A Better Community 500-FOOT PROPERTY OWNER NOTICE DATE OF NOTICE: September 30, 1999 • FILE NUMBER: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 1999-00013 FILE NAME: ODOT 1-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION PROPOSAL: The owner of record of the subject property is requesting permission to allow a Minor Land Partition of State of Oregon owned right-of-way into one (1) parcel containing 41,311 square feet. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to create a mixed sue employment district to provide opportunities for employment and for new business and professional services in close proximity to retail centers and major transportation facilities, to provide for major retail goods and services accessible to the general public and minor retail goods and services accessible to the public which works and lives within the MUE district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:. . Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.520, 18.790 and 18.810. LOCATION: The subject site is located in the NE and SE corner of SW Clinton Street and SW 67th Avenue; WCTM 1 S136DD, 1-5 Right-of-Way. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON.00TOBER 14. 1999. All comments should be directed to Matthew Scheideoger. Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Planning Commission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. • Failure of any party to addresfle relevant approval criteria with•fficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: • The application is accepted by the City • Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. • The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. • City Staff issues a written decision. • Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." CITY of TIGARD VICINITY MAP MLP1999-00013 mom A Ili a, , ST RIGHT Of-WAY X111ST• MIS ,• PARTITION Im■ .•i wiiii :11111 it S�INT¢N_ I I •■ Approximate Area • of Partition Reques N DARTMOUTH ST . o goo 200 300 aoo feel - va.r1 rell City of Tigard 01,1:turktm S III EMI I 1MT "fI T ma • OF, � � RECEIVED PLANNING 11.:4111 *:�:0 regon epartment atRegion 1 Right of Way , OCT 2 2 1999 123 NW Flanders i:g John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.,Governor Portland,OR 97209 CITY OF TIGARD Phone: 731-8400 FAX: 731-8458 FILE CODE: October 21, 1999 • Mathew Sheidegger File 19575 Assistant Planner N. Tig. Intch. - S.Tig. lntch. City of Tigard Pacific Highway 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Washington County Tigard, OR 97223 RE: MLP1999-00013 Dear Mathew, I am enclosing what I hope is the last piece in our Application for a Minor Land Partition in the Tigard Triangle. I have tried to address every eventuality that might result from partitioning and selling this parcel of Suplus ODOT property. However, if there is additional data or comment that you need from me, please let me know immediately. Very truly yours ,1 . l Carl Toland Right of Way Agent :u Form 734-1866(10/97) • • NARRATIVE DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS LAND PARTITION APPLICATION MLP1999- 00013 As stated previously in our Summary of Proposal, ODOT merely seeks to create a discrete parcel, separate from the gross area of the 1-5 right of way. ODOT will not develop the parcel that will be created, but will ultimately sell it at auction. As an applicant solely for Land Partition, ODOT will be creating none of the impacts of a proposed development; however, I will give evidence supporting some criteria that must be followed if the new parcel were to be developed. The parcel being partitioned contains a total of 41,311 SF and, although irregular in shape, it has average dimensions of 250 ft. X 165 ft. The minimum lot size for the MUE zone is OK and there will be adequate room for the required set-backs, landscaping and site coverage standards. The site will also be large enough to provide off-street parking and internal circulation. Water, sewer, gas, telephone and electricity are located in adjacent public rights of way. These may or may not have to be upgraded to serve a potential development -- as would the local street system. The ODOT parcel would have about 260 lineal feet of frontage on SW 67th Avenue. This length of frontage could facilitate the permitting of two road approaches and thus a simplified "U" shaped interior driveway and parking lot system. Southwest 67th and SW Clinton are 60 ft. wide platted public ways. A standard 36 ft. curb to curb Tigard Triangle local street can be developed within this right of way width. The ODOT parcel is one block from SW 68th, a minor arterial, and 2 blocks from a Major Portal in the Tigard Triangle. Southwest Clinton Street would be a poor connection to SW 68th Avenue due to the short distance between that intersection and the Freeway off ramp intersection with SW 68th. This intersection could be changed to right in--right out. Traffic might best be directed to the site via SW Baylor and then onto SW 67th. Access to this parcel will be adequate for all of the possible uses that are permitted outright. It would be a less suitable site for commercial retail. ODOT performed a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment of this parcel. The assessment revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions. The study was done by the ODOT Region 1 Geo/Hydro Section, Hazardous Materials Group. The portion of 1-5 right of way that is being partitioned has been EXCESS to ODOT's needs for a few decades; however, it has only recently been officially deemed SURPLUS. Sale of the parcel has been delayed by the thought that the area might be a good Tri-Met park and ride lot and perhaps a good location for a 1 • variety of ODOT office buildings. ODOT Planners and District Maintenance Managers were consulted as to how much of this area should be retained for possible future highway expansion. A line 20 feet beyond the existing fence has been drawn along the Haines Rd. off-ramp to provide for this eventuality. No doubt the developer of this parcel will wish to get a landscaping permit to include this 20 ft. strip in their landscaping plan until such time as the area is needed for future highway construction. Obviously, no access will be allowed from the partitioned property to the freeway off-ramp. The highway storm drain system has an ouffall in the vacated portion of SW Clinton Street. The storm water from this system will have to be dealt with according to current ODOT and City of Tigard regulations. Having followed proper procedures in getting this parcel declared surplus to State's needs, having appraised the parcel for a 1998 value of$445,500 and having addressed the applicable development standards above, I feel certain that ODOT's petition for partition will not compromise the high quality of future development in the Tigard Triangle. Carl Toland Right of Way Agent, Oregon Department of Transportation 2 Pc u £ST WDK Gmmwrs • • • MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: November 10, 1999 TO: Matt Scheidegger, Assistant Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: MLP 1999-00013, ODOT Right-of-way Partition Description: ODOT proposes to create one 41,311 square foot parcel from right-of-way they own. The site is located on the east side of SW 67th Avenue, and on the north side of SW Clinton Street (WCTM 1S1 36DD). Findings: 1. Streets: TDC 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. TDC 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. This site abuts SW 67th Avenue and SW Clinton Street. If and when this site is ever developed, street improvements will be required at that time. The proposed partition does not warrant improvements at this time. There is adequate right-of-way (ROW) on both streets to meet the Tigard Triangle Design Standards, so additional dedications are not necessary. 2. Water: This site is located within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. The partition does not warrant public water line improvements. ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 1999-00013 ODOT R/W Partition PAGE 1 • • 3. Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing public sanitary sewer line located in SW 67th Avenue that can serve this site if it is developed in the future. No sewer improvements are necessary as a result of the partition. 4. Storm Drainage: A complete onsite storm drainage plan, along with onsite detention, will be necessary if this site is developed in the future. No storm drainage improvements are necessary as a result of the partition. 5. Storm Water Quality: Not applicable for this partition. 6. Grading and Erosion Control: Not applicable for this partition. 7. Existing Overhead Utility Lines: There are existing overhead utility lines adjacent to SW 67th Avenue. Section 18.810.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the - developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in-lieu is proposed by the future developer of this site, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is approximately 264 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be approximately $ 7,260.00. NOTE: this fee would only be collected if this site is developed in the future and the overhead lines were not placed underground. 9. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of$ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to recording of the final plat. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 1999-00013 ODOT R/W Partition PAGE 2 • • Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 1. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30.00. 2. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Submit for City review three paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. • C. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive a letter from the City Engineering Department indicating: 1) that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor, and 2) that the applicant has either completed any public improvements associated with the project, or has at least obtained the necessary public improvement permit from the City to complete the work. D. Once the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer's signature. \\tig333\usr\d epts\eng\brianr\comments\rnlp\mlp 1999.00013.bdr.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 1999-00013 ODOT R/W Partition PAGE 3 • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF IGARD Community Deve(opment Shaping Better Community DATE: September 30,1999 TO: Tualatin Valley Fire a Rescue Fire Marshall FROM City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Matthew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner[x 3111 Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 • 57/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/.V. 7/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O/O4 MINOR LAND PARTITION(MLR 1999-00013 0 ➢ ODOT 1-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION Q ° ��>/o/Om/s/no.>C/�r>/nznnnrnnn/r7rsonn/s/n.rinn/nnornz/7/nnol D,/J/n�.rsi✓s/o�nn/1�o�onnrnnm.^1i7/onr7�qnno%norn/Jn�/r7 d7nnz/s/s/n�oaLn/rnrs�o�o/1�zo�rnoilJ/AO�/��/lo�/�/s/ The owner of record of the subject property is requesting permission to allow a Minor Land Partition of State of Oregon owned right- . of-way into one (I) parcel containing 41,311 square feet. LOCATION: The subject site is located in the NE and SE corner of SW Clinton Street and SW 6r Avenue; WCTM IS136DD, 1-5 Right-of-Way. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to create a mixed sue employment district to provide opportunities for employment and for new business and professional services in close proximity to retail centers and major transportation facilities, to provide for major retail goods and services accessible to the general public and minor retail goods and services accessible to the public which works and lives within the MUE district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.520, 18.190 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 14, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: • ✓ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: v (Please proviufe the fodowing information)Name of Perseids]Commenting: (_ i` /44cl'44 i o--1! Phone Numberisl: /Z- 70/0 (ajeas o);ou si dew) ODOT 1-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION £I000-6661d1W .62 N3NNOJ ...)079 031d7f37d0 3141 NON3 06'63 M ZZ'Of S 0NO33N ON N!x.8/5 r 09 z 0 z • 0 pp 1N3n3ndd 30 3003 0 3�3/- 3.00.00.0 N 56'697 1N/3f131dd� I 09•21-1 I '• I SB f008LZ NS) — 1 I 0f'0 3 Of'1 5 1 600 M ff'0 N ...NI 9NIA3AN05 370M.3d1/M (blbf 95) I (bloc 95) 335 L _ — dl.9/5 i'61 I CO NM00 dl..b/f— 1 8'0*MOO dl..3/1 I 1 / I 1 L 1 N , SODS i r (00927 NV (0'<i - Of ..JNI N11.13/Np5 J700..311/14 �+ I 81..9/5 .. m 1 v 3..0000.00 5 51 T91 3f1N3AV H.L9 MS 3.00.00.00 00'521 WW1 NS1 RIMS WOO AIINY3e A SAM: (fb661 NS) ..'00SSV 9 613d003..3dA/M U1..9/S 073N 0009 L (S-I) S 31111Sa31N1 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION CITY of TIGARD • GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM •,,,,Z)/) ,\ / VICINITY MAP • • ML PI999-00013 \ . ' O•D•O.T• - I-S A. l S. A ST • . - in /41 RIGHT-OF-WAY IN PARTITION /- - BAYLOR ST 1 • I , . _ < > 1 Q.----c----- k , \., CLINTON I ST l Approximate Area . —�� of Partition Reques co F., . N -\\\ . DARTMOUTH ST 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet 7"=378 lest C • City of Tigard ■minis ST Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13128 SW Hall Blvd — _ Tigard,OR 87223 s' .... III (803)639.4771 • http://www.ci.tigard.or.us Plot date:Sep 30,1999;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR Development • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C; TIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: September 30,1999 TO: John Roy,Property Manager/Operations Department RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division OCT 0 41999 STAFF CONTACT: Matthew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner[x 3111 CITY OF TIGARD Phone: 1503)639-4111/Fax: (503)684-1291 4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4 l4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/O/444 MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLR 1999-00013 o ➢ ODOT 1-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION Q L l/rs/f7rs//7//%d�/,r�ln./7�s//J/is n//y/,I�///n�./�%7/mss/rte/,/s//fl/✓fC/�/ni/fJ/Jf/rs�7/1///I//7/%/r7��/.I>/n/✓>//7/l/s7✓7/o//f/rs/is/s7//7/7/I7/1/n/ro//1/I>/rs/}4//7/9/.rl//ono/n%�/,n/A//�/.a/is/is/rs/n/✓�//�/�//�//f/�J/ol/7/mss/!1/rnrlyrs//l/�s,A/n/rflh The owner of record of the subject property is requesting permission to allow a Minor Land Partition of State of Oregon owned right- of-way into one (I) parcel containing 41,311 square feet. LOCATION: The subject site is located in the NE and SE corner of SW Clinton Street and SW 67' Avenue; WCTM ISI36DD, I-5 Right-of-Way. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to create a mixed sue employment district to provide opportunities for employment and for new business and professional services in close proximity to retail centers and major transportation facilities, to provide for major retail goods and services accessible to the general public and minor retail goods and services accessible to the public which works and lives within the MUE district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.520, 18.190 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 14, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: 1/ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: • 44 , : (Please provide the following information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: Al i! I Phone Number[s): psi I r'sJ & S ECR£t4 y MATERIALS AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING '' CITY OF TI'ARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community S7r1T'E OF oREGoN ) County of Washington )ss. City of*arc! • 1, Patricia L.Lunsforrc being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an .irfininistrative Specialist II for the City of Twanf,Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: MLP1999-00013/ODOT 1-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) • El City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: �i i AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council NOTICE OF: • (t ype/tuna Or MOM) • FOR: Ci (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) • A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICES] of which is attached, marke• 3 11111 "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhib- "B",on the 1T"day of November,1999, and deposited in the United States Mail on the ir day of November,1999, • post/ ag- prepaid. (Person at . epa -d • - Ice) A'2 Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the /v day of Abre ______ / OFFICIAL SEAL �/ 4�' DIANE M JELDERKS /L/ NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON k I l' ' ' I I I I I COMMISSION NO.326578 My Commission Expires: , 53 ■ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 • EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION A , MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 1999-00013 . , iii! CITY OF TIGARD; ODOT 1-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION Comment Development Shaping A Better Community 1 120 DAYS = 01/27/00 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: ODOT 1-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION CASE NO.: Minor Land Partition MLP1999-00013 PROPOSAL: The owner of the subject property is requesting permission to allow a Minor Land Partition of State of Oregon owned right-of-way into one (1) parcel containing 41,311 square feet. APPLICANT/ OWNER Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) 420 Transportation Building Salem, OR 97301 ZONING DESIGNATION: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to create a mixed sue employment district to provide opportunities for employment and for new business and professional services in close proximity to retail centers and major transportation facilities, to provide for major retail goods and services accessible to the general public and minor retail goods and services accessible to the public which works and.lives within the MUE district. LOCATION: The subject site is located in the NE and SE corner of SW Clinton Street and SW 67th Avenue; WCTM 1 S136DD, 1-5 Right-of-Way. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.520, 18.620, 18.790 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions-on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV-of the full decision... THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS. FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. j All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (250 per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON NOVEMBER 17, 1999 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON DECEMBER 4, 1999 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: _ iiy arty to the decision maappeal this decision in accordance h Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development t Code that provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within ten (10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the P anning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON DECEMBER 3,1999. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. cN - I/ , T. rfl z I° c x m 1 -- J` ii. , ; A $ 4' - I z r: o ‘1,0:-i� " , n r n n 0 rrnn.- r1r ti� .f D z \ ` Cy • R I \ ' S • \ Z SW CLINTON STREET a ,e eEry— • ); a ce g.-6. N 99M y ,^ �..g� �� P I U __.pn` ---- __ d SITE PLAN t MLP1999-00013 EXHIBIT MAP N ODOT 1 4 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION LJma.b flat tos I.l - FIV 1-) I I --_ VICINITY MAP //� MLP1999-00013 G✓ IP O.D.O.T. - 1-5 i\ .= A:, $T RIGHT-OF-WAY �I 11 �< PAR .��� ST 111111•* 1 I RC illm I -1 C INTON_ --L.,--- _ iED Approximate Area 1 of Partition Reques • DARTMOUTH ST ---- -- N I I h. Cayorhimd G ST L .w• .....rrr�.. ..... ...011$.,, T.4011$722, -1 . IN I ML /Q99 600/3 • • DEAN SMITH&Jo Ann Smith RICK&JANETTE HUG EXHIBIT 8 17880 Sarah Hill Ln Dale Deridder Lake Oswego,OR 97035 10500 SW Greenburg Rd Tigard,OR 97223 DORIS VANGORDON DIANE NOW BALDWIN LARSON 14430 SW 94Th Ct 3422 241St Ave SE Tigard,OR 97224 Issaquah,WA 98029 JUDY LORRAINE LARSON&Strojny Now - EDWARD CASEY JR. &Patrick Casey 555 Chestertown St PO Box 1898 Gaithersburg,MD 20878 Clackamas,OR 97015 PHILIP&REBECCA GOOLD RANDY MCNEILL 11670 SW 67Th Ave. 11700 SW 67Th Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Portland,OR 97223 ANNE LEISER JAMES&CORA CORLISS 6009 SW Pendleton Ct PO Box 23970 Portland,OR 97221 Tigard,OR 97281 IRVIN&JENNIE LARSON HARRIET HOGG 555 Chestertown St 6860 SW Clinton St Gaithersburg,MD 20878 Tigard,OR 97223 • GORDON ROOT&Wilma Root DONALD&JULIA GAIL POLLOCK 2413 Remington Dr 1834 SW 58Th Ave#202 West Linn,OR 97068 Portland,OR 97221 • ODOT ODOT ATTN: CARL TOLAND 420 TRANSPORTATION BLDG. State of OREGON } 123 NW FLANDERS SALEM OR 97301 } PORTLAND OR 97209 County of Multnomah } I certify that the above list includes all the owners of property within 500 ft. of certain Oregon Department of Transportation property that is subject to a Land Partition Application to the City of Tigard, OR / ,/,„_ep Carl V.Toland Dated: -q !rl / q , 1999 f -•�.. OFFICIAL SEAL J • artv'. PHYWS CLARK r ∎ �.� NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ,.;•,,/ COMMISSION N0.323550 r Notary Publ c-State of Oregon f MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 18,2003 e My Commission Expires: sire/c� 3 1"�ti1'`ti1111�Ltititi111".'��11ti'�11. • • • A AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING '' CITY OF TI'ARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community STATE OF OREGON •) • County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) • 1, Patricia L.Lunsfortd being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City ofTgard,Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: MLP1999-00013/ODOT 1-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) 0 City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FORE G-1 / AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer .Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:G�' AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council NOTICE OF: (I ypencina OT NOtICB) FOR: t� I (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Heating,if applicable) • A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE'S] of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked EXhi I it"111, on the nth day of Nov' ber,1999, and deposi -d in the United States Mail on the 171 day of November,1999, postage repaid. / / (Person t at- -repare• No Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before/me •- the / day of ,_��i/_ �. ,"1: - .. OFFICIAL SEAL SI/DIANE M JELDERKS \;.,; NOTARY NOTARY ISS euc,OR NOTARY PUBLIC OF I REG MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 My Commission Expir . 9/7/ • • EXHIBIT NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION MINOR LAND PARTITION IMLPI 1999-00013 CITY OF TIGARD Community Development ODOT I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 01/27/00 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: ODOT I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION CASE NO.: Minor Land Partition MLP1999-00013 PROPOSAL: The owner of the subject property is requesting permission to allow a Minor Land Partition of State of Oregon owned right-of-way into one (1) parcel containing 41 ,311 square feet. APPLICANT/ OWNER Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) 420 Transportation Building Salem, OR 97301 ZONING. DESIGNATION: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to create a mixed sue employment district to provide opportunities for employment and for new business and professional services in close proximity to retail centers and major transportation facilities, to provide for major retail goods and services accessible to the general public and minor retail goods and services accessible to the public which works and lives within the MUE district. LOCATION: The subject site is located in the NE and SE corner of SW Clinton Street and SW 67th Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, 1-5 Right-of-Way. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.520, 18.620, 18.790 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community_Development Director's :designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions: The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section V. NOTICE OF DECISION ODOT/I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION-MLP1999-00013 PAGE 1 OF 10 • • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PARTITION PLAT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED:. Submit the following to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager 639-4171 x318) for review and approval: 1. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30. 2. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Submit for City review three paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. C. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive a letter from the City Engineering Department indicating: 1) that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor, and 2) that the applicant has either completed any public improvements associated with the project, or has at least obtained the necessary public improvement permit from the City to complete the work. D. Once the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two Mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer's signature. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS OF THE FINAL DECISION DATE NOTED UNDER = - - THE PROCESS AND APPEAL SECTION OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Property History and Proposal Description: The subject site consists of excess right-of-way that was purchased by the State of Oregon in 1953 for various configurations of the SW Clinton Street (now Haines Road) connection to 1-5 southbound. ODOT seeks to partition a portion of the excess right-of-way to be sold at future auction. NOTICE OF DECISION ODOT/I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION-MLP1999-00013 PAGE 2 OF 10 • • Site Information: This parcel of land does not presently exist as a tax lot. It is loosely defined as lying south of,a newly established line that was created by a Lot Line Adjustment action (MIS 1999-00008); east of the eastern right-of-way line of SW 67th Avenue and northwest of the ODOT right-of-way fence along the present Haines Road southbound off-ramp. It also includes a portion of SW Clinton Street that was vacated by an Ordinance of the City of Tigard recorded at Washington County, Book 340, Page 286. SECTION IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS No public comments were received. - SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS FOR A MINOR LAND PARTITION GENERAL APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.420.050 contains the following general approval criteria for a Minor Land Partition: A request to partition land shall meet all of the following criteria: The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; The proposal conforms with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations as demonstrated both by the analysis presented within this administrative decision, and through compliance with conditions imposed as part of this application and review process. There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal; Streets, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water and electricity are available to serve the lot. Therefore, this criterion has been met. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards; and All proposed improvements meet or will be conditioned to meet, City and applicable agency standards. • All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements listed in the next section; The Specific requirements are discussed and conditioned if necessary further in this decision. NOTICE OF DECISION ODOT/I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION-MLP1999-00013 PAGE 3 OF 10 • • Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress, and Circulation. The access to the parcel is deferred until time of development, therefore, this standard does not apply. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one- hundred-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. The subject site is not within a floodplain, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: As proposed, all of the Land Partition Approval Criteria have been fully satisfied or will be applied during the time of building permit review for structures on the parcel. SPECIFIC PARTITION APPROVAL CRITERIA The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. The lot width required for the MUE zone is 50 feet. The width at the shortest point of the lot is 211 feet. Therefore, Staff finds that this standard is satisfied. The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation. There are three allowable lot sizes available in the MUE zone. Detached Units have a minimum of 1,480 square feet; Boarding, Lodging and Rooming Houses have a minimum of 6,100 square feet; and Commercial Development has no minimum lot size. The proposed partition is approximately 41,311 square feet. Therefore, this criterion is met. Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The proposed parcel has approximately 260 lineal feet of frontage along SW 67tH Avenue. Therefore, this standard has been met. Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. NOTICE OF DECISION ODOT/I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION-MLP1999-00013 PAGE 4 OF 10 • • • The following table lists the dimensional standards in the MUE zone: TABLE 18.520.2 • DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES MUE R-25 STANDARD C-G MF DU* Minimum Lot Size None - -Detached unit - 1,480 sq ft -Boarding,lodging,rooming house - 6,100 sq ft Minimum Lot Width 50 ft None Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 0 ft[6] 20 ft -Side facing street on corner& - 20 ft through lots[1] -Side yard 0/20 ft[3] 10 ft -Side or rear yard abutting more - 30 ft restrictive zoning district -Rear yard 0/20 ft[3] 20 ft -Distance between front of garage& - 20 ft property line abutting a public or • private street. Maximum height 45 ft 45 ft Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% 80%[11] Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 20% • [1] The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3] No setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [4] See Section 18.520.050B for site and building design standards. [5] No front yard setback shall be required,except a 20 foot front yard setback shall apply within 50 feet of a residential district. [6] There shall be no minimum front yard setback requirement;however,conditions in Chapters 18.745 and 18.795 must be met. [7] There are no setback requirements,except 30 feet where a commercial use within a district abuts a residential zoning district. • [8] The maximum height of any building in the CBD zone within 100 feet of any residential zoning district shall not exceed 40 feet. [9] Where the side or rear yard of attached or multiple-family dwellings abut a more restrictive zoning district,such setbacks shall not be less than 35 feet. - [10] Landscaped areas on existing developed property in the CBD shall be retained. Buffering and screening requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745 shall be met for existing and new development. [11] Lot coverage includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. *Multiple-family dwelling unit C-N-Neighborhood Commercial District C-C-Community Commercial District C-G-General Commercial District C-P-Professional/Administrative Office Commercial CBD-Central Business District Compliance for structures on the proposed parcel will be reviewed during the building permit phase on the lot. Based on the lot size and dimensions, staff feels it is reasonable that structures can be placed on the lot in accordance with these setbacks. NOTICE OF DECISION ODOT/I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION-MLP1999-00013 PAGE 5 OF 10 • • When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. The proposed parcel is not a flag lot. Therefore, this standard does not apply. A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. This standard does not apply because it is not a flag lot. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities. This standard does not apply because it is not a flag lot. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. The applicant is only proposing to create one lot, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, all of the specific approval standards have either been met or are deferred until time of development. ADDITIONAL APPLICABLE STANDARDS 18.790.030 Tree Removal Plan: A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. The tree plan shall include the following: Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. NOTICE OF DECISION ODOT/I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION-MLP1999-00013 PAGE 6 OF 10 • • Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D, in accordance with the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: a. Retention of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program in accordance with Section 18.790.060D of no net loss of trees; b. Retention of from 25% to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060.D; c. Retention of from 50% to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060.D; d. Retention of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation. • Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; • A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant did not submit a tree removal plan for proposed parcel. The site plan indicates that there are trees on the site, however, tree removal and mitigation will be required as part of SDR. Therefore, this standard can be deferred until time of development. Chapter 18.620 -Tigard Triangle Design Standards: • These standards are deferred until the time of development. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS Streets: Tigard Development Code (TDC) Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. TDC Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. NOTICE OF DECISION ODOT/I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION-MLP1999-00013 PAGE 7 OF 10 • • • This site abuts SW 67th Avenue and SW Clinton Street. If and when this site is ever developed, street improvements will be required at that time. The proposed partition does not warrant improvements at this time. There is adequate right-of-way (ROW) on both streets to meet the Tigard Triangle Design Standards, so additional dedications are not necessary. Water: This site is located within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. The partition does not warrant public water line improvements. Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing public sanitary sewer line located in SW 67th Avenue that can serve this site if it is developed in the future. No sewer improvements are necessary as a result of the partition. Storm Drainage: A complete onsite storm drainage plan, along with onsite detention, will be necessary if this site is developed in the future.. No storm drainage improvements are necessary as a result of the partition. Storm Water Quality: Not applicable for this partition. Grading and Erosion Control: Not applicable for this partition. Existing Overhead Utility Lines: There are existing overhead utility lines adjacent to SW 67th Avenue. Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in-lieu is proposed by the future developer of this site, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is approximately 264 lineal feet; therefore, the fee would be approximately $7,260. NOTE: this fee would only be collected if this site is developed in the future and the overhead lines were not placed underground. NOTICE OF DECISION ODOT/I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION-MLP1999-00013 PAGE 8 OF 10 • • Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to recording of the final plat. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30. SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Operations Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. • SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency, Washington County, General Telephone, NW Natural • Gas, Portland General Electric, TCI Cable and US West have all had the opportunity to review the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies • Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON NOVEMBER 17, 1999 AND BECOMES - EFFECTIVE ON DECEMBER 4, 1999 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. NOTICE OF DECISION ODOT/I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION-MLP1999-00013 PAGE 9 OF 10 • Aft • Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in - Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE.DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS.3:30 P.M. ON DECEMBER:3, 1999:;; Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. .,, / November 17, 1999 PREPARED BY: a • -w Scheid • r DATE Assistant Planner 011111 1011°_,_ 1.7 November 17, 1999 APPROVES BY: Ric and Bewersd•'49! DATE Planning Manager • I:\c u rp I n\m a t h ew\m l p\m 1 p 1999-00013.d e c.d o c NOTICE OF DECISION ODOT/I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION-MLP1999-00013 PAGE 10 OF 10 N ' A' 1-• A9 Z 0 z N P SITE PLAN T EXHIBIT MAP N (map is not to scale) �( a3Na0J 6.90 78 031V7I13763 3141 60a3 06'63 M ZZ'Of 5 .63 °a°J3a ON al,,Vg T II '? • $ 3f1N3A11 „1L9 MS 1NJ63,1vd !0 3703 — - 3.00.00.0 N 51,1690 1�3tdd/ 3„0040.00 5 III 1 .. . 09'Zhf I I Of'0 3 0E7 5 I 1 ; 1 rhfbf 651 I 1 I -1'0 NM00 dl,.b/f— 1 8'0 'r I L I I I I I 1 I I N `r�� 1 ■ _1_ I I 5819 (008!Z 651 I I 51'f91 I I 60'0 Ai MO N I I I I I ..JNI ON/.t3nan$ 370M,Jd.t%M I!1,/1,f NS) 335 a1..8/5 GI I I NAM dl..Z/1 L - - - - - - I I ��C I 1 / \yl I N 1� o I I I I 9 �� _ _ _ I I g H: T, `�,O6 , I $ / m N ,�% I I E If'/ ro0817 N51 O� I I i 1 ..361 7NI13�Ia0S 310M.Jdl/M — I I rn ! N al..8/5 m 1 v 1 l a 3..00.00.00 N O 0 o o I T I -M " G ,>s \` ` N 4 n � / — — — s4. 1 „�11 0,0 �� 426 s o �N' yJ / I I L 6 N�ab� ��s% _ _ _ _ _ _ _I L O I '1, 00'09 O ir`ri 00. • U -�„> I S2 ~ m _ I L 1 001501 MOW NM MIMS OOQQ \ f ANY A SAW 6( 1451 „'JOSSV 9 93d003..Jd.VM a1..9/5 07314 • L � MLP1999-00013 ODOT 1-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION (s-I) S 31d1SH31NI • CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION 5>. • CITY of TIGARD • GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM S . / _(:. 1\ VICINITY MAP • MLP 1 999-00013 \ i ill -► A _ ST / O•D•O.T• - I-5 41111 RIGHT-OF-WAY 11111. N w PARTITION 7- , BAYLOR ST ✓ i • . � Q . > Q . . 2 / . I , CLINTON ST s _ Approximate Area CD of Partition Reques _______\\\ • Al DARTMOUTH ST N . 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet _ 1"=378 feel n .I��� �. ;.1.+J 61 City'of.Tigard . •II-. ST l Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 .11.111 (503)639-4171 http://www.ci.tigard.or.us Plot date:Sep 30,1999;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR Development • • S r EXHIBIT B. ODOT ATTN: CARL TOLAND 123 NW FLANDERS PORTLAND OR 97209 ODOT 420 TRANSPORTATION BLDG. SALEM OR 97301 • • l • A i AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OFTIGARD Community cDeve(opment Shaping Better Community STATE OF O12EGON ) , County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) . I, Tatrzcia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) • . © NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: MLP 1999-00013/ODOT I-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION ❑ AMENDED NOTICE - (File NoJName Reference) • , 0 City of Tigard Planning Director O NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: . ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) . ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING FOR: / ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) (Date of Public Heanng) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director . ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer • ❑ Tigard Planning Commission . ❑ Tigard City Council • ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission • ❑ Tigard City Council U NOTICE OF: (Type/Kind of Notice) FOR: E7 I (File NoJName Reference) (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE'S] of which is attached; marke• a ibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B', on the 30th day of Se I tem II,r, 1999, and deposited in the United States Mail on the 30th day of Se(tem:er 1999 po •e • -paid. • ( ,.91,,,, 1/7Z---- (Person that Pry ed Noti -)/ - • �� p . Subscribe. - d sworn/affirmed before me on the 9 day of �'C�?�7?T5-er , 19_ 1 An,- OFFICIAL SEAL. } DIANE M JELDERKS ' A--,c_ •` ;:1 NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON NOT al O BLIC OF 0 EG SI No.COMMISSION SEPT.07,2003 My Commission Expires: 7/7 az 3 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLQR,VENDOR OR SELLER: • EXHIBIT A THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION LAND PARTITION CITY OF TIGARD Community DeveCopment Shaping A Better Community 500-FOOT PROPERTY OWNER NOTICE DATE OF NOTICE: September 30, 1999 FILE NUMBER: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 1999-00013 FILE NAME: ODOT 1-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION PROPOSAL: The owner of record of the subject property is requesting permission to allow a Minor Land Partition of State of Oregon owned right-of-way into one (1) parcel containing 41,311 square feet. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to create a mixed sue employment district to provide opportunities for employment and for new business and professional services in close proximity to retail centers and major transportation facilities, to provide for major retail goods and services accessible to the general public and minor retail goods and services accessible to the public which works and lives within the MUE district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: . Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.520, 18.790 and 18.810. LOCATION: The subject site is located in the NE and SE corner of SW Clinton Street and SW 67th Avenue; WCTM 1 S136DD, 1-5 Right-of-Way. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON OCTOBER 14. 1999. All comments should be directed to Matthew Scheidegger. Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Planning Commission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address• relevant approval criteria with Sficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City . ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written.decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." II CITY of TIGARD Nil, :- - �, ST RIGHT-OF-WAY -i„ -■ am PARTITION • ..1111 _ - ■ �IIII� 1 1"- ST :iiii I ~ Approximate Area q.j FE] of Partition Reques DARTMOUTH ST f \ N I ,m SCO 300 ADD 501 f.n 371 bet UWE City of Tigard 7�4,IT1,r Lm I scw rm aw e..on Irm Aml w.l. eepn....1ya-. • • EXHIBIT B DEAN SMITH&Jo Ann Smith RICK&JANETTE HUG 17880 Sarah Hill Ln Dale Deridder Lake Oswego,OR 97035 10500 SW Greenburg Rd Tigard,OR 97223 DORIS VANGORDON DIANE NOW BALDWIN LARSON 14430 SW 94Th Ct 3422 241St Ave SE Tigard,OR 97224 Issaquah,WA 98029 JUDY LORRAINE LARSON&Strojny Now EDWARD CASEY JR.&Patrick Casey 555 Chestertown St PO Box 1898 Gaithersburg,MD 20878 Clackamas,OR 97015 PHILIP&REBECCA GOOLD RANDY MCNEILL 11670 SW 67Th Ave 11700 SW 67Th Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Portland,OR 97223 ANNE LEISER JAMES&CORA CORLISS 6009 SW Pendleton Ct PO Box 23970 Portland,OR 97221 Tigard,OR 97281 IRVIN&JENNIE LARSON HARRIET HOGG 555 Chestertown St 6860 SW Clinton St Gaithersburg,MD 20878 Tigard,OR 97223 GORDON ROOT&Wilma Root DONALD&JULIA GAIL POLLOCK 2413 Remington Dr 1834 SW 58Th Ave#202 West Linn,OR 97068 Portland,OR 97221 ODOT ODOT ATTN: CARL TOLAND 420 TRANSPORTATION BLDG. State of OREGON } 123 NW FLANDERS SALEM OR 97301 } PORTLAND OR 97209 County of Multnomah } I certify that the above list includes all the owners of property within 500 ft.of certain Oregon Department of Transportation property that is subject to a Land Partition Application to the City of Tigard, OR Carl V. Toland Dated: a4144-4/ / �1 , 1999 y. • OFFICIAL SEAL 0641) l f ar+rr PHYWS CLARK t::::); NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON „ COMMISSION N0.323550 Notary Publ c-State of Oregon / MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 18,2003 My Commission Expires: S 1R'/0 3 • ! REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C, TIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: September 30,1999 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Matthew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner(x 311) Phone: 15031 639-4111/Fax: (503)684-1291 F.:7/40/4 7/4W 70/.P/A7 47/67/O/O/P/P/.p/P/0 7.07 0/Q/O/O/O/P.:7 47 47/P/.p/O/O/.O/.P/A/P/P/.P/.p/67/O/O/4/O/P/P/.p/P/.0/4 7/P/O/O/O/P/P/O/P/.74747/O/O/O/A 047/.p/O/O/47/O/O/P/4 7/O/O/p,Z747 740 7/.7/4,70%.7.747/0/.O/O/O/O/O/.O MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLR 1999-00013 0 o ➢ ODOT 1-5 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARTITION Q �i s�rn�i/simrsnrnzisi i i sizrn.7ir�rii��rnoi i/ri�ii7nir»rsnirn.7inninzrvisinnn/nn.7i�i��izriinnzr7i��irnrnr�nmrsiisimnnzmrnr7iis�usiisirnnnrnr>i�iisirn�i rnni7i�i�irn�r>i sii7��i The owner of record of the subject property is requesting permission to allow a Minor Land Partition of State of Oregon owned right- of-way into one (I) parcel containing 41,311 square feet. LOCATION: The subject site is located in the NE and SE corner of SW Clinton Street and SW 61t Avenue; WCTM IS136DD, 1-5 Right-of-Way. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to create a mixed sue employment district to provide opportunities for employment and for new business and professional services in close proximity to retail centers and major transportation facilities, to provide for major retail goods and services accessible to the general public and minor retail goods and services accessible to the public which works and lives within the MUE district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.520, 18.790 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 14, 1991 You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If You are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: V (<Please provide the fodowing information)Name of Perseids)Commenting: Phone Numbertsl: 'REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE&COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS ,CflArea (C)(Ui(S)(WI - . . ::CITIZENINVOLVEMENTTEAMS ,. , Place for ietdetNinubraryCRBobkisi •-fILE NOM:. P/7 7 2) '( FILE NAMELSI: 7 t =5 4 t ei l7.Nft�� ,CITY OFFICES . _LONG RANGE PLANNING/Nadine Smith,Supervisor _COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./ovipmnt.svcs.Technicians _POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention officer BUILDING DIVJDavid Scott,Breding Official o• ENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,ov,ornnl.Review engineer —WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,Utilities Manager _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,city Recor er.) OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,Property Manage OTHER - . • , " ECIAL DISTRICTS, - :. . • ,,:„, . TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*.TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT*_UNIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY Planning Manager Fire Marshall ministrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Street Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 . LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS •. °. • . • _CITY OF BEAVERTON * _CITY OF TUALATIN* _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street,NE Mike Matteucci,Neighbrhd.word. PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97310-1337 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 _OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. —METRO GROWTH MANAGEMENT* _OR.DEPT.OE GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street;NE _CITY OF DURHAM* Manager,Community Development 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 Portland,OR 97232-2736 _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 200 PO Box 2946 • _CITY OF KING CITY* Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION 15300 SW 116th Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) _WASHINGTON-COUNTY King City,OR 97224 Building#16,Suite 540 Aeronautics Division Dept.of Land Use&Trans. Portland,OR 97232-2109 Tom Highland,Planning 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO* 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director •�OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Bonneville Power Administration _Brent Curtis(CPA's) • Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera ODOT,REGION 1 * _Scott King(CPA's) PO Box 3621 Sonya Kazen,Dvlpmt.Rev.coon. _Mike Borreson(Engineer) _CITY OF PORTLAND Portland,OR 97208-3621 123 NW Flanders _Jim Tice(IRA's) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir. Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Tom Harry(current Pl.Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 _OREGON,DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY _Phil Healy(Current Pl.Apps.) 1120 SW Fifth Avenue 811 SW Sixth Avenue _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A* _Sr.Cartographer(CPNZCA)MS 14 Portland,OR 97204 Portland,OR 97204 Jane Estes,Permit Specialist 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A Portland,OR 97221-2414 Right-of-Way Section(vacations) - Rick Reeves 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97209-4037 • N-:;` UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _. _`• ' _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON,ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue '. Albany,OR 97321 '. _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations only) Pat McGann Michael Kiser,Project Planner 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court 710 NE Holladay Street Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 Portland,OR 97232 • Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 _PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY _GENERAL TELEPHONE _ US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer Elaine Self,Engineering Patty Stambaugh,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue MC: ORO30546 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _TCI CABLE(Apps.EdHaWN.of89W) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Joy-Gay Pahl,Demographs&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merto Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006 Portland,OR 97232 * •INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IF WITHIN SOO.OF filE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOB ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS. (PROJECT PLANNEit If RLSPONSIBLE FOR INDICATING PAPTIES TO NOTIFY, h:\patty\masterstrfcnotice.rnst 1-Sep-99 * 1 LAND PARTITION TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 PRE-APP. HELD WITH: ll� GENERAL INFORMATION DATE OF PRE-APP.: Property Address/Location(s): NE corner $ SE corner of SW FOR STAFF USE ONLY f'1intnnSt. SW 67th Ave. SW Clinton Street is vacated east of SW 67th Ave. Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): Adj agent to the south of 1S1 36DD TL 4100 Case No.(s): 0.10/9--096/3 Site Size: site consists.. of entire I-5 right of way Other Case No.(s): cI 7 SW Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: Oregon Department of Trarlsp. Receipt No.: 420 Transportation Bldg. 503-986-3626 Application Accepted By: • Address: P g• Phone: Date: O City: Salem,OR Zip: 97301 Applicant*: Same Date Determined To Be Ltt Jg Address: Phone: Comp Plan/Zone Designation: City: Zip: * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the CIT Area: applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession Recording Date and Number: with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written Revi1/26/98 is\a,rpin\rriastersVandpeR.doc authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request permission to REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS allow a Land Partition to: divide excess I-5 R/W into one parcel ✓ Application Elements Submitted: (total area) (#of parcels) ❑ Application Form containing 41,311 SF t and ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization (sq. ft. or acres) (sq. ft. or acres) ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed Area to be partitioned will be surveyed by Wolf ❑ Site/Plot Plan (provide any additional information here) (#of copies based on pre-app check list) Surveying, Inc. to provide an exact plat and area ❑ Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/2"x 11") to be sold by ODOT I=1 Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) Cl 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped Le • es ❑ F'ing Fee$780.00 1 List any VARIANCE OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained,upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject ro e • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. cl / DATED this / day of ,�L._ , 19 7' i Zile■Iri -.00P AllieLnitrigAlealli OF Owner's Signature Matte tag f Owner's Signature O00 Owner's Signature Owner's Signature • • 2 sm lnab • CITY OF 11GARD September 30, 1999 OREGON Mr. Toland • Oregon Department of Transportation 420 Transportation Building Salem, OR 97301 RE: Notice of Complete Application Submittal — MLP1999-00013 Dear Mr. Toland: The City has received the necessary information to begin the review of your land partition application. Staff has, therefore, deemed your application submittal as complete and will begin the review process. The estimated time for rendering a decision from the date an application is deemed as complete is approximately 5-6 weeks. If you have any questions regarding your application or if I can answer any other questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x317. Sincerely, Lit it1-4110/it (41W Mathew Scheidegger Assistant Planner i:\curpin\matheMmis\varl 999-00013.doc c: MLP1999-00013 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 • • INTEROFFICE MEMO OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION 1 RIGHT OF WAY 123 NW FLANDERS PORTLAND, OR 97209 (503) 731-8444 (503) 731-8458 Fax DATE: September 21, 1999 TO: Matt Scheidegger Cit Tigard Current Planning FROM: Carl Toland Right of Way Agent, Portland SUBJECT: LAND PARTITION APPLICATION ODOT VESTING DOCUMENTS As you requested last week, I enclose copies of the deeds whereby ODOT acquired title to the area now under consideration for land partition. This includes the two land exchange deeds (which have been recorded, but I do not have the recording information as yet)that facilitated a lot line adjustment recently approved at the City. I will be pleased to provide any additional information to support our application. 5-5(;° 0 r 4 €''''/ i 1 I 1 i g i , ,...., . 1 ...) 1 ...1 ....) .) 1 I i1 1 1 ... 1 t i t ... ......„......„.,„..„..,..:......... . ........... I i i 01 li I 1 i t i 1 i .... 1 ...., ;,....,„ ..„. , 1 I;„„,./''cot' „1.997.i.j..fif,,,iiii •.0 i 9 - • -1 i '- 'iN. ':"9-.:', .: _ 0,115 ,7_,. 1„--- -- ' - • . -- i . . _00-0- .. . . . . .. .... . . . . . .. . .... ... ,. . .. . i , 1 .4 i ._.......„..„,„........,.......„.„...„...„..____............04_0,, _ i • 0.4.„ 3 , i: . ,,,, ''''?.' '...‘'''',1*',.. . :',..,,'"..,„:',-,,,..,Y,...'...• t'-'... . .. . ...„ , -,......,„- . .. .. .., . .. „. ....... . _ ...,. .... I' . . „ . = • • ,- ,, • ' ' - '' -7--) 65 Tl/ A VE„ . .. ... . . . . ' . „ i'..i.....„•'''.'..-.'„,,,,'4,:x.o... .(//:: (1 1 5 T E R i i . 1-4,P19514 .------...,............„.... ...„ -I, -1 1`9 7,410„„„1 ,.. -- mr------1-'"" -----C`dm-d1----"'-`---1----"'--— . '.." I, 14 2 9 5''. - , 47/5 - :e0,000 - 4 =75 7te f ro 04 i 1 ‘4-1 , r, •.f ,.. .......11 , 1 5 Ni - I, 476 t tr) 6 3 69 1 4.7.4 5'59 " I it JO 5490° I i , 1. .r li `'''` I Is. 1 i I i 3 900-A 1 . Pik/40 :7e 5 4 6 9 iflii'A 1 4 47 0 , ., .'W468i:3,t - t ;.- 1 1 t R14/4020 i ------------ 4„1 ' ' 47°4-11 77 r 45' ' 'MK;47 ::: 471447.33 7 :33 1- - -- p-, /4 '4 19,..1..-W34 f - ili , -- f? i '"'". /Ai 4'' 3-7 - - - ). 79 74C37 7 ii7 R.L44 6 5 Y771 1 to i * 1 1 ,,,.„).A Li ' /79-6(77 i . .. 1 i 1 "7, -- ,. Ni /1 17":„77,D.,... 7 _,..., 4 71 77i '`'7 -4 4775 Kt Kf 0i „,z 0 075424 roi..01 ' ' L.. 75. 3 a,:.494:,,' '''i '''''= NI -4.=et i tr, ,i(-,T. NI *.,41 tit 4.1.5`. Nsi 39 0.0-A'--3 • 4,7)i, l'.7rf:..) 4'1- 517'-'7' 17 'tcls'.;)..:..L..),o'.'o,,)-)1 741:: 1777,41:1.77,7:,,,,,7.1,71/11.,:, 07),,, 777,71,; ::01.,,,..tie 617 740 RW 4020_ -- : , = r I-- - VI 7- /70-4tlf Ish A ' ii I 1 5472 a .1 i ) _ , .A., . . 4 t4. ... _ , ,. t., 1'.- ik)41 4 f ger ".(5t:-,f,.•/‘ _-.1 rn„ •,,,-. ,,,,,,,,--- . z , ,- ... ..-- -1 1 1 .11 i„....• -.‘„- • i, ,, .. .465,...;.: ' ,: 4 ;I. 4 575 74c 074054 itn, I ' I t; , :,, ,1,, , 1 k A I I f "4 14 ';',, 1 390 0„).,,k i -5 '.4, ' 1 ! .)). 4 7,7, 3 50 37 I' mi r 1- 4 1., i,57,,, 'Q I„... li?'.4,:,11, t ..4.! 1 1 1 i 3 ', ... 441 1,. ,,' 1 i,.'q .2 ji4'*' 44.42 4.°C."' KP‘i •; = e.:fit22,2, i„:,5:a ...„-,4) 7__.-717` „A) 77)747.....)- 4,7 -4 -1,... _....... .4. 4,L. !,. .,.. i. ,...,64. ,..t..„,„0„..,.,..„..„...„.10:„.„„...„1„.„.......,____„..„ . . .„.,..1„, .0_0.000_ ..„......„,„„_,..„,......„.._ ......„.„. s 0-6777 f N . ; . , tiff '. 1G ARFIE L (:). ,5 7 I _.,.. , .,.. ..., ...-- ,1/5, 0 i /37., ,3-11/z.....7„ . .,. . . t,_, ..,..,.., T 1„,...., 1:,..„T ..1,:,_,,,,,......... ,,,,,,,,..._;;;, : , ,.,....,„,..,,,,,,,,„„_„1 1 ..„...."..__.r. 1 ,T_ .,.._ fi„....,,..,..,...,i....„_......_.i..,__ ...... _____ I l.. „.., I . „ .. . m 0. . 1 I 1 ''''''' l' ; ' ' (-7'.' 1 L i . 1 it , I , ., ' i . 9 g . ,i .• - :(4,.. : , .', 3 . 1. , , I - — - 1 1 I i 1 , ,, . i ,--,‘. 1 ,,.., ' ' ' - l''''' 1 '' 1 ' a*vt; '- 'N '., ' Pi/ Jodew2347,1 i - , i , i te,„, 4, 4, . ; . . , 4/4. ...„- 4., , ,..',5%7-A tx il. ,,,,!") ''''' 't t5p 5 t4 ',..) .' ' '' ''' 1: ...„1 .7 1 -1,. 0) (7...; 'Pr% 77424-774 . 1 .. i ,.1 .7',7 , 7) ,- ,.4.. .1 1 , Vti , 1 ,.., .5t, , 55,, 14 1 5,, ., , ...1 1 1.1, . .55 7fr i I)) ,t1, ...1,f/ 1,- 7 3---3-3-3"373--337-1 i i i t Nit, '::,i 7-3 i: cr't 57 0;340 ,,,,, '-`------ - 'V .„ mi m I .,,- .M ,,i'""'" '..1!'l ,,,1 - ,.„ , ,,,,„ . „4, . ... ..,„..i...,:„0:04_,, . , 4 ..„.„ 1,,,„gfer4: e,a, 1 , , ;4 .,,,,, ;,„ '‘,-, mi, m-"!..."„ml. %.g. m IT- %.,,,,,I. ...m 1- '- 1 "'"'l '''' --- ,, PP 4.,.. ' '''' / ,..„,. .*:14° -,9 ,.,,,1.,z.,,NI g. .,,,,,,,,,,,26 Pi ,214,,,,,,,. tn„, .,, , k i V . 04004 4••.' , , [ 1 1 .• , - .,. ram,-,, z,,... NI .„....., za .-,.. ,.. . '6',-?38 -;',:,,.' . , e 00,, ,, , 4; .,kiN''''..,..br: )t.: I „,',' 17-4-.7.22-4z/:...„ . .- 13 a a ' I ' .., '' 1 1 I 6 ,9,1 0 - 1." . 4 e,.7.60 tr. ''',. , 0 r', ...‘ 70. , , . .. c, ,,,, . e 4,, V5i .1z. 5 ,:. '''.'. , ,., ". A i\. 0, 0'' 1''''' ' 16 I .,- -, , , ,„,., ,,,,,, i ,,,,„1,.. \40i,, ,, '')t ':!-; 4„,,, .i ; ... - rk . ,A , 0,,,i te# V '.1.p *, 4,,,,,,„,4 / .i,z 1 ., - . 5,' .L4,4411'44 f4.1411.4.1 4.14' 0-1 4041 1 1 i-----------------------1 1 4. i ....FN '',7 I- - -- ,, '. i..K Ka alttfr glizti , / .„.,• I .'''''''.; '''''''''''' ' '',I.,.,....„..- iV 77014555 "7 ''''''.' " ,,,,' .. .— ' 11/ . , ... /LINCON . , , - 1 -/ , . .. .. .. . . ,.... ... ..,.„ ..„.. ....... ,...., - I ,,,.. , , i „............1 f ' r i ifl -,.....-, • • L 4N I) "IRA/ ODOT File 19575A Trade to 19575B 1 A-8-6A DEED The STATE OF OREGON, by and through its DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Grantor, for the true and actual consideration of the trade of property and other value given or promised does convey unto ANNE LEISER,Trustee of the Amended, Restated Anne Leiser Trust Dated May 23, 1996, Grantee, the following described property: A parcel of land lying in Lots 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21, Block 7, WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, Washington County, Oregon and being a portion of that property described in that warranty deed to the State of Oregon, by and through its State Highway Commission, recorded January 14, 1953 in Book 340, Page 427 of Washington County Deed Records; the said parcel being that portion of said property lying Northerly of a line parallel with and 38.15 feet Southerly of the South line of said Lot 18. This parcel of land contains 2,731 square feet, more or less. This conveyance is made and delivered upon the following express conditions, reservations, and restrictions: 1. Subject to special assessments, existing restrictions, reservations and easements of record, if any. 6-16-99 - TAX STATEMENTS SHALL BE SENT TO 6009 S. W. Pendleton Court Portland OR 97221 RETURN TO PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 411 Transportation Bldg. Salem OR 97301-3871 e ORIGINAL • ODOT File 19575A Trade to 19575B 1A-8-6A 2. That the above described land shall never be used for the placing or maintenance of any advertising sign, display, or device, except such sign, display, or device used to advertise the activities on said land, or the lease or sale of . said land or any portion thereof. In the event of violation of this condition, Grantor shall have the right, through its authorized officers, agents, or employees to enter upon said land and remove, destroy, or obliterate any unauthorized sign, display, or device, without liability for damage or injury thereto, and to recover the cost of such removal, destruction or obliteration from the owner of said land. 3. That no junk, scrap,junked motor vehicles, or parts thereof, debris, trash, waste, or other such materials shall be placed on said land for whatever purpose in any manner so as to be visible from a state highway, provided that such items as listed above can otherwise be placed on said land without violating any applicable law, ordinance, or regulation. In the event of violation of this condition, Grantor shall have the right, through its authorized officers, agents, or employees, to enter upon said land and remove or destroy any unauthorized junk, scrap, or other material mentioned above and recover the cost of such removal or destruction from the owner of said land. 4. That this property shall not be used for the operation of any garbage dump or sanitary land fill. If such use is made of the property, Grantor may, at its election, enter upon said land and restore it to the condition that existed prior to said use for garbage dump or sanitary land fill purposes and recover the cost thereof from the owner of said land. 5. That this conveyance is made upon the further condition, which shall constitute a covenant running with the land, that Grantor shall not at any time become liable to Grantee and grantee's heirs, successors and assigns in interest, for damages to the land herein described or any buildings, structures, improvements, or property of any kind or character now or hereafter located upon said land or for any injuries to any owner, occupant, or any person in or upon said land or for any interference with the use and enjoyment of said land or for damages which except for this covenant might constitute a nuisance caused directly or indirectly by noise or air pollutant emissions from transportation vehicles using the highway or transportation facility adjacent to said land. Any reference in this covenant to the highway or transportation facility adjacent to said land refers to the highway or transportation facility as it now exists and also as it will exist with future improvements. Grantee and grantee's heirs, successors and assigns covenant not to sue Grantor for any said injuries or damages. It is understood that the conditions, reservations, restrictions, and covenants herein set out have been considered in determining the amount of consideration of this conveyance. The rights and remedies herein reserved or provided shall not be exclusive and shall not be in derogation of any other right or remedy which Grantor may have. The conditions and restrictions herein contained shall run with said land and shall forever bind Grantee and grantee's heirs, successors and assigns. Where any action is taken to enforce the above mentioned conditions and restrictions, Grantor shall not be liable for any trespass or conversion as to any real or personal property. Where legal proceedings are commenced by Grantor to enforce the foregoing conditions and restrictions or for the recovery of the aforementioned removal or destruction costs, the successful party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and court costs. • In construing this deed, where the context so requires, the singular includes the plural and all grammatical changes shall be made so that this deed shall apply equally to corporations and to individuals. 6-16-99 Page 2— Deed • • • • ODOT File 19575A Trade to 19575B 1A-8-6A THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS . INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. Dated this / .'' day of 7, l IN(mac_ , 19°1°1 . STATE O OREGON, by and through its DEPAR NT OF TRANS RTATION By ir ,/ c Deolinda G. Jones, Ri ht of Way Manager STATE OF OREGON, County of Marion Ca /c12 , /.9)99 . Personally appeared Deolinda G. Jones, who being sworn, stated that she is the Right of Way Manager for the State of Oregon, Department of Transportation, and that this document was voluntarily signed on behalf of the State of Oregon by authority delegated to her. Before me: ell*. . o ICIAL sEAL G 6Y:'1Y." w / (-- ������''''�`�,� CANDACE R STIERS \ `�'; `NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON Notary Public for Oregon COMMISSION,NO.305480 MY •...i.:, ...• EXPIRES Pg0, 10,2001 My Commission expires /,. -/O-c7O0/ • 6-16-99 Page 3-Deed ael/ • 06/29%99 TUE 16:29 FAX 503 986 3625 R/W HEADQUARTERS 444 PORTLAND R/W U001 • •. Post-'tom Fax Note 7.71 Date � pages► usyrsimmlinaew- ammo CoJD_.: , 1 —• Iii fFIRINNII Phone# Pho e Fax# Fax# ODOT • File 19575B Trade to 19575A 1A-3-6A DEED ANNE LEISER,Trustee of the Amended, Restated Anne Leiser Trust Dated May 23, 1996. Grantor, for the true and actual consideration of the trade of property and other value given or promised does convey junto the STATE OF OREGON, by and through its DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Grantee, fee title to the following described property: Lcts 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26, Block 7, WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, Washington County, Oregon. EXCEPT therefrom that portion of said Lots 21 and 22 lying Northerly of a line parallel with and 38.15 feel Southerly of the South line of Lot 18, Block 7, WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, Washington County, Oregon. ALSO EXCEPT therefrom that portion of said Lots 21 and 22 described in that warranty deed to the State of Oregon, by and through its State Highway Commission, recorded January 14, 1 253 in Book 340, Page 427 of Washington County Deed Records. • ALSO EXCEPT therefrom that portion of said Lot 22 described in that warranty deed to the State • of Oregon by and through its State Highway Commission, recorded October 26, 1953 in Book 474, Page 287 of Washington County Deed Records. ALSO EXCEPT therefrom that portion of said Lots 23, 24, 25, and 26 described in that warranty deed to the State of Oregon, by and through its State Highway Commission, recorded January 8, 1953 in Book 340, Page 286 of Washington County Deed Records. 6-16-99 RETURN TO AND TAX STATEMENT TO Account No.: R286283 1S136DD-C4100 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGI-T OF WAY SECTION Property A_ddress: 420 TRANSPORTATION BLDG. Portland OR SALEM OR 97301-3871 ORIGINAL 06/•29/99 TUE 16:29 FAX 503 986 3625 K/VV HEADQUARTERS -)44- rulc1Ltinu n/TT Wj UUZ• • ODOT File 19575B • Trade to 19575A 1A-8-6A ALSO EXCEPT therefrom that portion of said Lots 23, 24, 25, and 26 described in that warranty deed to the State of Oregon, by and through its State Highway Commission, recorded February 14, 1953 in Book 480, Page 461 of Washington County Deed Records. This parcel of land contains 2,731 square feet, more or less. Grantor agrees the consideration recited herein is just compensation for the property, including any and all damages to Grantor's remaining property, if any, which may result from.the acquisition or use of said property and,the construction or improvement of the public way. In construing this document, where the context so requires, the singular includes the plural and all grammatical changes shall be made so that this document shall apply equally to corporations and to individuals. THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY .SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. It is under:it:ood and agreed that the delivery of this document is hereby tendered and that tf3rms and obligations hereof shall not become binding upon .the State of Oregon Department of Transportation, unless and until accepted and approved by the rel:ording of this document. Dated this i/2 /'ff day of ....,a 1 /f , 197'9 . z7fii_e_a.: Anne Leiser, Trustee '(14 . STATE OF OREGON, County of x&1C Lem'&_ - 4-2-(k ( [C . Personally appeared the above named Anne Lei:3er, Trustee of the Amended, Restated Anne Leiser Trust Dated May 23, 1996, who acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be her voluntary act. Before me: OFFICIAL SEAL / PHILIP H PETERSON Notary Publit' •r Oregon „/ NOTARY PUBuC-OREGON !( "' COMMISSION NO.3113033 ' My Commission expires ff_ t 01 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOV 11,2002 6-16-99 Page 2—Deed ael/ ..T.�L�fitrtt� ,'::, ly.�sea..'.. �iR --.• anylx. -.�.�• ..-. . 'e - ,_t �t;tfl5S ::,,rp-,;�;.-•••_T •r.-, - J• I� Sr i_ - — ..---,:;,,`• . • : .:..�_�. '��1 ' ,i W=' Jiff _ .ltt !' .. ' aMst.,y_9...�i _.._......-_...._.._.._.___.-..._ .;.,r. _.�._ ._...__..grantor._,for the consideration of �`� •mi�d . f ' .� bl� Wit+ Q �L L321(1_��..r._n_n .n. i.a w_w...........,......DOLLAR4 � .gyp."• '• :a` - paid, have bargained and sold and by the prey--nta do bargain, sell and convey ; T :.unto the STATE or OREGON,by and thriagh Its STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION,the following described promises,. r� ,i to Wit: ilparcel of land lying in Lots 23, 24, 25 and 26, Block 7, West Portland .'. -. _ - Weights, situated•in the Southeast quarter (sE;t) of Section 36, Township 1 South, - Range 1 West,_W. N., Washington County, Oregon. The said parcel being described as follows:- • -- - Beginning at the Southeast corner of 'said Block 7; thence North 89. 161 15r T-,• West along the South line of said Block 7, 100 feet to the Southwest corner of slid Lot 23; thence North 1. 011 45" East along the Best,line of said Lot 23, 28.27 feet; thence on a 164.63 foot radius curve left (the long chord of which bears South 75. 381 41" East) 78.30 feet; thence South 89= 16' 15" last 24.51 . feet to the East line of said Block 7; thence South 1. 011 45" West 10 feet along the East line of said Block 7 to the point or beg ning, The parcel of land to which this description applies contains 1450 square '. feet. 'C i . . !I TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises with their appurtenances, in fee simple, unto the said AN State of^ by and through its State Highway Commission, its successors and assigns forever. And .--_I the said grantor do hereby covenant to and with the said State of Grego:1, i,y d,.1 ill Highway ----_..__cn' and assigns, that I am. .. ......... the owner..... Eli through its State tugnway C.ommi�ion,:..�........_...._.. .--- --_o.__, . in fee simple of said premises; that they are free from all incurabrances and that I will warrant and defend the same from all lawful claims whatsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, .............1•_-_--.-..--.._...have hereunto set ny hand and seal Ili this...... •'--- .day of-..---- . Done ,19.Vii . Done in presence of: • `�) j [SEAL] =7 n. STATE OF OREGON, ~. `: county of G�z. " �-- __11--) ss -- On this-.-_--_.-r2 day of L�%� .= �� I9.S..impersonally came tefere me, _ in and for said county and state,the within named '' Il- a notary public_._-._.._......-•-----......_.._..-...----..-......_... y ...::..:c ----_..sr ji@_3s__Iti aQAA_A_ dQW --- G..- -.................._.-_.-_.._.._...........................:..........,k;sc-a:LF- --tiy 1.—,Tr. to be the identical person____. described in,and who executed, the within instrument, and who personally acknowledged to me:hataShe_...executed the same freely and voluntarily for the uses and vgposer therein named. III •?a:ss•mY)Yr„d and official seal the day and year last abova:ters • 2 i • • aeaeae` ��.1' `‘' : �; "r "` - - *-Ne. 19576 fa. ,. ` 0•6::-. • • ni irk A ashaz1 na L. Iii l ar4.L Sdtiaf_aad lfa r h -&.._.-.._._ • '+'x~ "•r i(l4 n grantor_e..,for the oonside.•ntlon of A.'' _ _ ham,, -,'IS";-i,Um:maiti::..--C adi brad 'Lhirt.u. ,g,a4..vxt,iuv._ 1 •10 ' al.. ' paid,hew.berpined and sold and by these presents do__..bargain,se11 and convey • .,`-" • • wito the STATE OP OREGON,by and through Its STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION, the following describ!d • premises,to wit: A parcel of land lying in Lots 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22, Block 7, - *est Portland Heights, situated"in the Southeast quarter (SEt) of Section 36, Town- ship 1 South, Range 1. West, W. X., Washington County, Oregon. The said parcel be-. - ing described is follow: • Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Block 7; thence North 1. 01' 45" -- East along the West line of said Block 7, 175.54 feet; thence South 88. 581 15n East 10 feet; thence on a 164.63 foot radius curve left. (the long chord of which "it bears South 30. 291 4111 East) 181.16 feet to the Fast line of said Lot 22; thence South 1. 011 45" West 28.27 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 22; thence _ North 89. 161 15" West along the South line of said Block 7, 100 feet to the point of beginning. • The parcel of land to which this description applies contains 8090 square feet. ..e. V <2‘,••-, TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises with their appurtenances, in fee simple, unto the said A State of Oregon,by and through its State Highway Commission, its successors.and assigns forever. And_____XQ_.... the said grantor.._s_do_..__hereby covenant to and with the said State of Oregon, by and through its State Highway Commission, its successors and assigns, that we are the owner in fee simple of said premises; that they are free from all Incumbrances and that.. ma. will warrant and defend the same from all Iawful claims whatsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF ___...___..we_.___. have hereunto set our hand._.and seat..... r — this____._./______day of._._..v.artttar _._._— ,19 s,'3 Done in presence of: - 1 .... ....:.....__......C-?.'.�. [SEAL] _ • __._..._...._.._......._...................... - ___._.•._ ! 7 &ti- .... ._•2 Lt-T-&—t.3 [SEAL] - • STATE: OF 0 N, ` 1 iss.Cotmty of_ 7 On this_ _._ day of____-- personally__._ -_._..-���__ _,1ttcL-1, rsonati came i,efore me, Notes Public • a __ -?'P___._.._ and for said county and state,the within named • •_atlierias L.. Ent .r • wlclow =dr-._._— .m to me Dersonally kpo?en to be the identical person__..,described in, and who executed, ::-.c -:thin instrument, and w .aclaow. :".:M th!.she..,,cy-utt ci..the same freely and voluntarily for the uses '',� r-i,��';�T' -� ►d official seal the day and year last;'•. written. . ..ter,.-... _.•^`.,, ::...:1:.'•••!' •_ . t;r_:'k.{..,•.`•_":',a•i.".'"...t'4:-... 1.C. • • • 11080 • Tile Bo. 33739 WARRANTY DEED (Individual) • Anob3 SOU Olen bp btgt Vrtgtntg, That..I, lassie 2. 'Eacatpeoa, ......... ...a ypxs .. ...grantor.. for the consideration of • the sum of......... Ole Thousand..three_livadred.Iitt Land..tki/.100.I.41.35Q) - -- - - DOLLARS to..... .. ......tR4.... . . paid,have bargained and sold and by these presents do....bargain,sell and convey into the STATE OF OREGON,by and through its STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION,the following described ■ premises,to wit: A parcel of land lying in Lots 23, 2L, 25 and 2b, Block 7 of West Portlanw He.Oita, Washington County, Oregon, the said parcel being des ribed as folluras Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Lot 26; thence South EA' 10' L.3• West, 109.77 feat to the Weat line of said Lot 23 at a --int 55.26 feet Horn, of the Seuthwst corner of said Lot 231 thence South along said West line 26.99 feet to the t.orthwsat corner of that property described in Coat deed to the State of Oregon, by and through its State Highway Commission, recorded in Book 310, Page 286 of Washington County Records of Deeds, said p:,int be v.27 f-+t North of the Southwest co--er of said Lot 23; thence Easterly along U. 'therly line of said State of Oregon property to the East line of said Lot 26; thence North +long said East line 90 feet to the place of beginning. The parcel of land to which this description applies contains 6,3.,. square feet. As a part of the consideration .areinabove stated, then. its •1so bargained, • sold, conveyed and relinquished to the Grantee all existing, future or potential common law o: statutory &utter's aaeammate of access between the parcel herein described and all of the Orantor'• remaining real property. It is expressly intended that these covenants, burdens, restrictions and r•eservationa shall rum with the land and shall forever bind the Grantor, for heirs • and assigns. • omemar ter, • • I. r eon( 480 r i,c 461 s . . . 2.7•••■•••■■••••• 4.........w,. ..•". .............--..---..------...., . . . • •-■ ..... •. —.. . • '''' . . . . - . • . . • . • . .. . ' . . . . • . ' • , . . .. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises with their appurtenances,in fee 'imp's,unto the said Sts:e of Oregon,by anti '-vagh Its State Highway Commission,its successors and assigns forever. U . .. And . . I ..the vt.;wantor.....do hereby covenant to and with the said State of Oregon,by and , •. through its State Highway Conunission, its successors and assigns,that I.am in fee simpie of said premises;that they are free from all enc:_mbrancet li • and that I . .. . .wilt,-;1-.-ar..and defend the same from.111awlut claims whatsoever. . . IN WITNESS WHEREOF,.. .. r have hereunto set. ...M. .hand......a-d seaL....._ this /./..-e/t day of ... r-' ,' O. • Done in presence of: .. .-s.":•.......4.44-- )//..._-,......./.4....4.4.-e- (SEALJ (SEAL] Airli pli;1 .. - . .., , ‘Z'..• ...: i . 8 . ,. '• „a) z'i :1,..;*-,!7(''.^4ai .-4 cl I B 6r•iiii :1J., .‘.;:::: •' 4•:;••11 4 i 1 ,.:. i ,-.1 g ›. , x a i e to * A "--.-;;:....;• ,r..,,•..;,- . 'Pi I 9 1 . - a•-i I 1 ,11,-/!!! :,..,''''''''''''''' 1 ;1 1 ,'..- 0 ■ - ! (/) 1 t5 . et• t 8 3. S - •- ea - - • _.• ,. k ?..; .,-; i . , II_A I 171311v i 46.4' 1 ;1 H . . . ! ...- 8 . 1 . 1 i ! . . , g . STATE OF OREG2N/ . . sa. County of •f (4-..---■,-"Z-."-•+a-' ,..._....., On this.///57".‘‹day o ,..: •('': '19 trta personally et me before me, 1 i,... a Notary Public In and for•ald county and state,the within named . ...Janata.P...Thompson, .,widow, .mot I•'' tc,me personally known to be the identical person . de-eribed in,sad who execute re within instru rent. ...) and whospech perv•nitly acknowledged to me theta be executed the&arr.. freely and voIuntatily for the..es and purposes therein named. ,..,„;-.39!•;:e..u...,;:-.., ..,—. Wttness my hand and offichZ?S'Llho 0:ie.:ki.year ta9rabovantse.. ,..., •„.. /.-- , :i•Li( -. 4.-:. ...' •:-.../. ,.71-C.c77.-.,s--,-,-p...-... 4(‘'el. -,-.-,____ , . '1 *. . •-?... ,-. -; :7.- :'. - o :: . lay Cemethool"r.A.P•,•1 t1C, `' -A-4 . M y commission expires. _ j • i . - :: ,!-1.5ill'........:•-•;‘,: :.. :2:- - BOOK 480 P49.462 :. ...- .-- .-- .- - - ,.. ... . .. _•.. 1 . .. ' ---- k ---33828 ;1--, ...._,,,, 44 • . • . fa So. i ',::::.--4 - s... • . • - • - •.i..!.: i•- ---..-.:-,.,s, , .,.-:,.::".-•;. '' 4110 . • . , • . .• .... , ,..,. . , . . ...„ • , ._. . .... .. WARRANT! DEED • i. - • '.. .:-',-. . --; :-.,— •.- ..-•-.."-:::-.. ..-...,. -.. . _ .._....... . _ • KNOW ALL XEN BY THILIN PRKSKNTS, That we, Iatherine L. 'Cutler, & widow, and ."--,.=-:•:-..-,--_-7,-.:•-_ , Martha Entler, a single woman, Orantors, for the oonsideration of the man of . . . . . ., '7- Two 812Thdred Fifty and No/100 RPIZAR5 ($250.00) to us paid, he.ve bargained and sold • .... - : ,....- -,:-.-1-: -:". - -...i.1- - . • ._:,-,. and by thee presents do bargain, sell and °airway into the State of Oregon, by and ':-'.-_.:;.,.'.....".;" . ...- . -„".,-.,:.. ,..-...i7- -,- -- - i7• - through its State Highway Commission, the following described premises, to wits ..,.1- --7- --. .. • , - A parcel of land lying in Lot 22, Block 7 of West Portland Heights,..- ,.--. !..:it'::•,-... ....:: : Washington County, Oregon; the said parcel being described se followes • -_-::.:"At" . _ .-: ..!•,-...cr. - . ";.-..--- - <;.-......--- • Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 22; thence North along • .-•.:.1...'-• '- ' - : -..-. _,.. ..1..--..; • . - the East line of said Lot 22, a distance of 28.27 feet to the true point ,,...„ . -: ".-• ; ,- ' ' of beginning, said.point being the moat Easterly Northcast corner of that • . . - property described in that deed to the State e.if Oregon, b7 and through its •,'..- .. -. r,.Q;:.,,.--,.-..-.- .--i3O:5-• • . . '-r. '...,:- . : State HigIrway Commission, recorded in Book 340, Page 427 of lianh.ington . . ....;.0::- - .-"...-,„...-..: :.,. .. .. .,..-._"?,. .-.. ',7-,,i-.:•- . ••• County cords of Deeds; thence North along the East line of sa,id Lot 22, -i, •-• - •"---:LP.,'. ..... . a distance of 26.99 feet; thence South 66° 401 43" Weat,-,27.44,-.-leet to :-'s.,.. .. • ' :.I.:-';',:v.'. -•,;•.7,-, .-. • - - :- -.. the intersection of the West 1.1ne of said•Lot 22 and'the'NortheasterlY-".. - . •, ,:'.:.-.,.-';... ‘,--- • -line of said State of Oregon-property; -thanes Southeasterly a1Ciig:intid • ' . ___..7". .-:-,-,--;-."..-',-- - -..'Northeanterl,y line to the true.point of begitming. ..-r:•!..• '-.-•.. ..:2--..7.--., . • ' - ,:- - The parcel of land to which this description applies contains 350 Square. . -""P.,..:".-- - '7"•-.4".•...... " • ;:." feet. . , . . ... --.....1.;:K. . • . -: - .-....:3w--. As a part of the consideration hereinabove stated, there is also bargained, -:-.•,-i. .- . . . -_--r4.:. . . .•-:L-...- sold, conveyed and relinquished to the Grantee all existing,:future or potential . _...-,-.,.?, . 1 _ • .-:.- .-:.: .. . , ,.,..._..... -..:•,:..-. - common law or statutory abutter's easements of access...between the.parcel herein . •;;:t.:14 . . .. ""- -,,,„;.:.; . - described and all of the Grantors' remaining real priiiierty.. .-;',.N,::,..,y.r.,',.:,..• • . -.% .7 ..,, . . • _ .- ...".77- ..., : ' :. -•,--•1•7- • • :,'-.-.,Xiti'S • 7 •__.:gii.',.. :!,•-< TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the"laid-premises with their'appurtenanacese An-.fie .-....-.- , . .,... .. . . - -'-- • - -- - '!'•.'t -. .---:- - unto the said State of Oregon, by and through its State Hightaiy-Caamission, its ...,......,.... .... .. ,.. ... .t.e. f!,-:_:.:*' . -- -- -:- . - successors and assigns forever. -,-.,• . -.--:11.: . . -• • - ' •:"..-. ...„,..: ...•.",- : -'....As a further part of the consideration hereinaborre stated, there is also .,..:;;;F:"4.. - " - :-: --'4':;'‘'.:•- . _ .':-'''. -- • . ..... -4.-t7- i . . . . bargained, sold- and conveyed, and waived, released and Va^eLinquiabed—unto.the State -,-. ,,,t1.;:.-•, • of Oregon, by and through.its State Highway Commission, all easements and rights of ..":1 .-1-‘,`; -.- .•:.;:. '.', -. -. - . . - . . access and all rights in the nature of rights of access which have accrued, o. may . '• -_.1,:`211_-_L-__ ....-- 2-,,,..,.-.'-:: 1 ...._...,.._. : - - hereafter asc.roe, from and between Grantors' property in Lots 20 and 21 of Block 7, , . ',.:4.4. i - ...: .: , --,,-,..•;1,-: ..-...- - • • . . . . . _. ..,c--.-:, . - • West Portland Heights, Washington County, Oregon, and the adjoining right of way of ---•-- - -.-:- • . .... .. -... the public roadway heretofore conveyed to the State of Oregon, by deed recorded:4n --..7:•-•.:,7.1r -- --.-.:-..-: . ..‘-''.----••': --• - -• . :•;:1"4".! Book 340, Page 427 of Washington CountyNecorde.of Deeds, withtheintent that all - -:-..."-:,!,..2,.„.i....;:..,..... :::......-.:..- . •--;:-.- ... ..- existing or subsequently accruing easements or rights of access'betwo' en said Grantors' '.-..-f,'•'....j.:--:-. ."----.."--:-,.--;--4:-:;,:'...- • . ,.,, ... ..• --,.. . . - '-',.,."-_;.'-: -..-..:.:-."....-:.:::::;" ..... , .. . Property and the adjoining right of way of said public roadway, are hereby. conveyed -......-i-.';'-'---"-:."..-:-:-:"..-. :::-..::`.,,,-;..• • . . . , ..... , --7:::: to and vested in the State a Oregon, by and through its State Highway Cocomission...-._„ ..-7',---.:,."-,-;..,-.-:-..,-.=,,...,„1-:,,,, . ..... . . .... ._ ..... ....... ,.. . .. . . . -. -:.•;::::-.: .;2:•-•'- . - .• . . .. . _. ,,,...„: -_.: ... "•-•.'i•.=',".::: --• - - .-.;:ri.-. --.:-=-.-:...7.7.--"-,,,-----::.-.----;::::::: TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said salsemert ta or rights of access, or rights in the • "..-;.,.::";:".:4 ""'---":-----.:'?"-:-*:•-•,-""--:;.' .,_ .. . . . • ----.---:-...-..-:,-....,-1--‘---..-----1" -m .• ___. ---,.."- .: - - nature of rights of access unto the State, of Oregon, by and,through it. State - • - "r ...".-::',-;:..,::::::-..'.'...---,....-".:•• --'.'"'----.::::::.'1-;. • -;::::::::7 i.;;_ •- • Highway CoinainaiOn, its"successors and assigns forever... "..":.'":: ':. - .: . ..::.•---... -. --..""-.-",•:::-.':--:.,:•---,-...":::.---:=-ff•-.-"=:-":.--- -":•'• -- ::.'":".:"""-."::i::;":-.:Y:.•'-,•:-"•• .... ".' • .. --..'"..:::.:-":"...•""3-:'"..;':'...-;-'',',',.-...",1-;.`.-:::-•:-,..:.":.:-..--;-:'•-.:-..../.",",.'.-:,,-.;.,.4,7..-",.::".":".... ..".."-''..:"--;":."•:"i " - . " --." ": '•::-'.'•.•"-1-:"'..-'::•-• --...':?.c.!. :' 5f: :7 ' = 1 1'......'-".'-'.5'';.s'•-•1:"-:;;. i."J;.:; .-'.. .""',.:.•-i*. -',..4. ..-- , 4 . ,.".!. :- . .. ...---:,..,:r.:.---:-:,-----,-.-.:-r:4.1c.,-..,.'',•."::;-:-.,,-..-- 7-,1 ,-..:1•ii..i.,- . -.474 FAGE287....:-.. .. .. :-.-:::,...,,,, • ,,i-:-.. ,-,:;,•;_f••--;-•:--,L-•;----,1.--F:',.4. -:,,t,-__:-:_:.---:::::-_---,,,-.-•:::::::\ii,-_,-; • ••-;.;•' • ---:-••-•• _ •: • :•.....:-..--•.-_:....,,:„..,:-,,...„....-••••••• • •••„--,-:,-;:--::-. . ,'F:.!..:77?--:',-.-7, .1'..:7,-...--..--•;:?:::.-:-3. .,.-.:::,..-:;.:-..-;.i.--)-.'S ,.,..;,, -,..-..,- 7'. • . . .:,....".-.:;;■,: :,„:„. .::..:.:. :.:.: •-, ..;;".....•:;,-..t ..:7:_"....f.'`..,..C...f...'.....„.."..,:_f•: ::.:,-.,... .::, :.'...;:,i••:.:.--..-:...........::::i.-5."7"1.',:•:;..-,;ti... ,2.;•‘;':;;7,; ^'::.:-:‘:::".•,• .•.''...T=.7.:'-:..-i;7:1-',,...-7'..','fi-.. .. _ r,-13c . ..--- , rage .2 - WD' . . • .--, . • ,. . „. _.. . . 4110 And we the said Grantors do hereby covenant to and with the said State of . , Oregon, by and through its State Highway Commission, its successors and assigns, ... ,-. . , . . . . - that we are the owners in foe simple of the above described primal's.; that they • . . . . . . _. _ . . -... ._,.._ are free from all =cumbrances and that we will warrant and defend the same from ..;.: .-,-• .--,-; all. lawful claims whatsoever. - :-.1 i,,,,•1-•,.-- -........-.- --... It is expressly intended that these covenants, burdens, restrictions and reservations shall run with the land and shall forever bind the Chantors, their .:-.i_-,-,--• • --:-.i --1; •- •- heirs and assigns. -... !'. ••;•-• .... . . • ' - - ,,ii, - ----.:.:-•••----';,17-- • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals this ...----, . . -.-.•--- : , • day of (re,tri e t, 44'.• 1962e 4...;;; .- ",,,,••••• •' ,..1.! '- .. .:.,_• . •' •.',7-:. -' •f". .. . :"1:::,: : :::-;:t• • . ' - '-' • •,-•- -- .-. .. _ . " .. o:gfict2.N/L..eeZZi (SELL) •' 'Mt'. _•:_.:' :1':-• . _ -. -. • • - '. • • __(SEAL) • • • ---_-,1 ---. ,,,t,',-"-.• . . . .-.,-;:it .:..........: ' ., . . . ±-:•.-.ffz;. -.-t..,71.- . . .,.....-. 4 .., ..:. -- -•- • STATE OF ORF.GON • '•:.-7-71c - .;...:ZP.'---' •• jell . . . . . 1 County of 7;:-4:‘.I.- -.7'''" "•'i,. . . ., -.;*4 • ..„,.:.-r-r . I, ' ....-- . -.:.::."..*.•. .. .:!,,- Ca this /br- day of /ft.,/ : i-. . , 1962, personaLly came before me, : ,•;;;;:ig:- ':-.....4.• --- •.- - - .,- i a notary public in and for said county and state, the within named Katherine L. .• , • ' Entler, a widow, to me personally known vc be the identical person described in, '...-1•1 '--.-..---ei:-• • •. • . '.. and who executed the within instrimant, and who personally acknowledged to me that -'::.'.:,1.;- --••-..: ?.t.''.- -she executed the same freely and voluntarily for the uses and purposes therein : :- - i :..'.-• - a- -.%:.:-.,..• - . - .- ,wo ..N*,,,„. • . . • .:.,,,-;.:, :--..-.:_. ,.....,:. ----- • .:-.-4,...- xlitneorTilic.: suad ofrizial. seal the day and year last above written. .... , . . • - -4,?•A. e\,%.•--*:::**.f. ,.;,'..,, - r; . •-. ;,:•:,1..- • - _,,..,•.. •-_-•--- A .... ...., • . '.-.--.. :.- -...-:.-• *••*'-'- • -, • . •-..•;.•-:, ..4..„ . . ... • _ . . '1•0•''-'- :. :-.--."-:"Z.:.:..,•en:: • • Lr . ..(..... "._22.:_:_ -_:_....=_ L_La,-....... :;"•4-'•'--c.r?!.."-•• f-7.d... ....... ;..,A.: •2 . Notarr.Public for Oregon. ti .. .. ...: . -. - ,i7. • •••-p7-; .. G.:4. . • . _...: -: ,,,',.,•1 - .•-. ,...- •=ot% -4,lit *- = • :.:' •• . ..,.,,,-..-:•-,..:elle:b; •. - •- .:•,.. • •• '' ,,,,,.,.„••.•.•;•<•--,.e-1'..t.!.•;••.-- ---- . Hy cosaission C•:expi..res ' "' PF ay =E11b E r7% 7 3v 2 . STATE OF OREGON • .''. ...- • -:•:'..1.- ...,- -s• )es ••,-ii, - : • ••:',.';1.,• County of )2•z( I/. • ) • • •.• . -. . , , -.-14-- - -"--:•.!-:::-. ' . .,.....„ On this '/-4. day of •fi..• 7-4.e'l . • '. , 1962, personally came before me, .. ::.. ."-•::- ', a notary public in and for said county and state, the within named Martha R. Entler, • ------• - - . a single woman, to me person:Lily known to be the identical person'described in, and • who executed the within instrument, and who personally acknowledged to me that she. --•-•.- :,•.••.:-, ...-. ..,,,.-. - - .-•:-•,-;-.1,•_•_.„.•_-,,.„._,„_•• .. .-, -.4' - • executed the same freely and volinstarily for the uses and purposes therein named. - - .....----.:.••-• ,-....,:-..---.--•:-.., ---.. ...'::,.:•„- •..,_ • Witness my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. .:-...:.!..,.•• . . •••-• . - - • . _ •• •••f--,,---r.,:f.-_-' • - :-. . • • . .„••• . . • ..-.".'%Y.': • " - ...„7/;• . . /. ...;;;.'. ..21.:..s i‘ ., .,,- ..-,.. ..".J..:,.:_•„":."!,''• ..•...--..ill • ,,, / f,•••.. i • .. ..- .,.. . . . , --..'-'-'•i .„...._........,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, •___. -,• • • '': ' - • ••'' •' • Notary PubLic,for Oregon ' -..... -.••••; •..:•‘',..- tZik:6-im',,, .-,• : --•.. ........ ..-- • . •- .- • • • , --..•-.• g',-- •---'- .4't-v•-•,,'-•,::,...V.o%, •••••• • -.!, : --. ' •••2•-•• .• /fy critimmission expires A • ), -- : s•.:: ':---.:. .i.-"•;--'7...j-...2.-:.--.:•• c-e,; ',,C1 3. :' !.7.1.,,k,•-- ..cA_S ji • • - - ',:;-- : ... .......,'".:.,.!.....1.--%i:..": cc Y14.:3 * '0.-'.-'al..'',:-..:.•.." 7: ;.•...'... ..,.. .: . - -2. .". • My CommIre.:3 E:c!7::.Nev.::(N,1.154 ' -':"... ' - ..•-'''.• '' :.1.1,-: :..i1,‘:.:-.- •:::::,•.,'; Ineht: - 't - r.1■1:;)— ...,Ct.C) 1,...,84 :: .'.. ' .' -., ..; .7-. ::.:...." . ..""■14".':C>tt;r • :.•-••,:e(--:-:-.., -f:,':. r.,..-?:..... ' ..: i-( •••• g•.(41 Zr.j. . .....t. ' - let, .,fr).;.,••••••=e-..,v..*I';,, ,ar.4;i2•••• ••.:•. :, ..- --,-.. -_•-; .• - • -' -.!,:"!ii?.'fivilf. ...5t 0*- •-.--- -,- -?---•:.•...:•..-.•• --• WO 4* ..411:i, . l'fr.-kro..411,, . v.7.. ...r. .. . •• , .. .„ ...- ...., • . • .st!..e., ,,,,,Ili% ..,,', ,•-• •..-•. 7: -: • • ::: ..r. ISOtat.:224 •.•,'1,..:..;:ligt,,....r.`-.;;., ':::.-f".1.-,1",... ,'' • •;*.':"' ..,...,..-. .......,.-.-.'......, NU 474 fa 288•..:"....-. . .. . . . . .... ..- il';11. -a -,,,,-....-;...1-.....:.'..7.-... ,...',E.f...7:.:. ..-.... L.;1:,........::.:::,,,..:,,,......%.,,...":..:0,..;4:''.v,,;?....'-f,".4-3.7.."-T r"-'"'-',.--...-.:::.:....--..:,•.=:.....--g,.:.:,:r.::t!:--.:T..;17.i;-.:,vtr.-'-..-.-_-`..-....:.'•'..---- .-..-2,-?..-::;" ..!;;;.,,-..,fL..--:.7..:-.2', . .. _ .__.. .. . .. . . .. .. . . ... . ... .. . ............._... ._. . . . . . • • . • IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON • FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON STATE OF OREGON, by and through its ) State Highway Commission, composed ) of Glenn L. Jackson, Kenneth N.Fridley ) and David B. Simpson, plaintiff, )) ) Case No. 24-774 vs. ) V E R D I C T • JAMES F. GAULD and NINNIFRED M. GAULD, )) • husband and wife, Defendants. ) We, the jury, being first duly empaneled and sworn to try the above-entitled cause, find that the just compensation to be awarded to the defendants is in the sum of ;3,775.00. Dated this 30 day of April, 1964. Myrnella H. Meyer Foreman Filed Apr 30 4:45 PM 1964 ROGER THOMSSEN, County Clerk V. Brown, Deputy County of Wasir.r(..,a 1, Roger ihc'rn^r.. Crrr;• • r•r! ea-officio Clerk of the c r' n for the County at Washingtcn,d.;I. - t copy Verdict by■:•,co;r,:: , • r::is is n correct u•ans;:r+•:t;.e%:•-;,,,, . • .:.d Verdi n ti:.•s..:a;.;..:i:....:. .. ..-. a:y custody. IN 1S'i ' ).• . ;i::;:d dud aiIiz- ed tLc s,::.t c:r. . r..::: 6th. May A D.104 �./.:., :. . ,_..:TY �:1.: • 1 2 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON 3 5 V 3 FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON 4 <� , i 5 STATE OF OREGON, by and through its ) State Highway Commission, composed ) 6 of Glenn L. Jackson, Kenneth N. ) Fridley and David B. Simpson, ) 7 ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. 24-774 8 ) vs. ) FINAL JUDGMENT 9 ) JAMES F. GAULD and WINNIFRED M. ) 10 GAULD, husband and wife, ) 11 refendants. ) 12 13 The above entitled cause coming on regularly for trial on the 29th day 14 of April, 1964, before the Honorable Glen Hieber, Judge of the above entitled 15 Court; plaintiff appearing by and through Jack L. Sollis, of its attorneys, and 16 the defendant James F. Gauld appearing personally and by and through his attor- 17 ney Theodore B. Jensen, and the defendant Winnifred M. Gauld appearing by and 18 through her attorney Theodore B. Jensen; a jury having been called, duly em- 19 paneled and sworn; the parties having made their opening statements; a view of 20 the proposed acquisition having been held in the manner provided by law; the par- 21 ties having adduced evidence in support of their contentions and having made 22 their arguments to the jury; the jury having been regularly instructed in the law 23 and having retired for deliberations did, on the 30th day of April, 1964, return 24 its verdict, which said verdict, omitting the title of the court and cause, is in 25 words and figures as follows: 26 "We, the jury, being first duly empaneled and sworn to try the above-entitled cause, find that the just com- 27 pensation to be awarded to the defendants is in the sum of $3,775.00. 28 Dated this 30 day of April, 1964. /s/ Myrnella H. Meyer 29 Foreman'' 30 and which said verdict was regularly filed by the Clerk of said Court; and 31 It appearing to the Court and the Court now finds that the real prop- 32 erty and interest therein described in paragraph III of the complaint is neces- 33 sary for a public use; and 34 It further appearing to the Court and the Court now finds that the 35 • • 1 • 2 plaintiff, prior to the commencement of this action and pursuant to its resolu- 3 tion, attempted to acquire said property and interest therein by agreement and 4 purchase, but was unable to do so; and 5 It further appearing to the Court and the Court now finds that the 6 amount of the verdict of the jury exceeded plaintiff's tender to the defendants 7 prior to the filing of the complaint herein, and that the defendants are, 8 therefore, entitled to a reasonable sum as and for attorney fees herein, and 9 the Court now finds that the sum of $ is a reasonable sum to be 10 allowed defendants as and for attorney fees; and 11 It further appearing to the Court that the plaintiff has now filed 12 its Notice of Election to Take said real property sought to be appropriated 13 herein; and 14 It further appearing that the plaintiff has deposited with the Clerk 15 of this Court the sum of $3,775.00, together with interest thereon at the rate 16 of six percent per annum from April 30, 1964 until paid, and is now entitled to 17 judgment in accordance therewith, appronriating the real property and interest 18 therein hereinafter described to the State of Oregon, by and through its State 19 Highway Commission, in fee simple, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances; 20 now, therefore, 21 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by this Court as follows: 22 I. 23 That the real property hereinafter described be and the same hereby 24 is appropriated for public purposes, and that title to said property, together 25 with all rights an easements therein, be and the same hereby is vested in fee 26 simple, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, in the State of Oregon, 27 by and through its State Highway Commission. Said real property so appropriated 28 is described as follows: 29 Lots 1 to 11 inclusive, Block 14, of West Portland 30 Heights in Washington County, Oregon, containing 27,500 square feet. 31 32 33 34 FINAL JUDGMENT - page 2 35 • • 1 2 II. 3 That the defendants shall recover of and from the plaintiff the sum 4 of $ 750,0n as a reasonable attorney fee, together with their costs and • 5 disbursements herein taxed in the amount of $ 6 7 8 Dated this 8th day of May, 1964. 9 10 11 Men Hieber 12 Circuit Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 FI4AL JUDGMENT - page 3 • • S SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL LAND PARTITION APPLICATION THE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION seeks to partition a portion of excess right of way for future sale at auction. The excess right of way was purchased, beginning in 1953, for various configurations of the SW Clinton Street (now Haines Road) connection to 1-5 southbound. This parcel of land does not presently exist as a tax lot. It is loosely defined as lying south of a newly established line that was created by a lot line adjustment action (MIS - 99-0008); east of the eastern right of way line of SW 67th Avenue; and northwest of the ODOT right of way fence along the present Haines Road southbound off ramp. It also includes a portion of SW Clinton Street that was vacated by an Ordinance of the City of Tigard recorded at Book 340, Page 286. THE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION does not propose to develop this parcel but intends to sell it via auction at the conclusion of the LAND PARTITION PROCESS. The contact person for ODOT is Carl Toland, Right of Way Agent, 503-731-8444. Address: 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209. -�> __ _� _ �Q,, z INTERSTATE 5 SITE PLAN IN BLOCK 7 AND BLOCK 14 WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS 5°02'16" W I ' S.E. 1/4 SEC. 36, T. 1 S., R. 1 W., W.M., ��m 100.75 F� CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON /i ZI S2S� ��� /0 00 - l% �' 41..311 SQ.FT.+/�-� •16> o �. - co fq: 7 / .'ill 2 1. N O S o yil �Q S'°./ C' } / 6 y\-9r4 GS' SCALE: 1" = 50' r'l� Q - 7s; �i 0 20 40 60 • &7 �� � � 5 o F / G � �_ NOTES: 1-u ti� / -� Q 9= I. CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'/ Cil Q� / 2. ELEVATIONS ARE ASSUMED . R /,, � I L° CD co_ 1//- ( Lu \� {I ° �/ \ - . ( N 0°00'00 " — G �/ n G r\ L )- C� ` -‘,„\\-\\ S.W. 67TH AVE. L G ,...0 0.)G - -p n • ''-j o '. Lu _.7 . ui 1 60' DRAWN BY: PM r CHECKED BY: .01F OWNER Wolf LAND SURVEYORS PROJECT NO. 99194 OREGON DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION 1 18428 S.E.PINE STREET EQUIPMENT: SOKK1A SET 4000 SER. #012263 4E0 TRANSPORTATION BUILDING PORTLAND,OREGON 97233 618-0564 Surveying,Inc. SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE JULY 28. 1999 SALEM.OR 97301 STEVEN L. MUMA, PLS JOE H. FERGUSON, PLS PAUL J. MORIN. PLS LAWRENCE U. HART, PLS . PARTITION PLAT NO. • LMT ATE 5 RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NM . IN BLOCK 7 AND BLOCK 14 WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS SCALE,1"•30. S.E. 1/4 SEC. 36. T. 1 S., R. 1 W., W.M., 0 15 30 45 CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON O /00.75- f 1 S 5°02'16"IY • I ko N I B 1 2S ap03..9 1 +�`PT N I yG 60.00 tic' 1 0 SY.f 1 - - _ - _ F-,..% - - - -1 3 HELD IELD N < (� 1 - c I Acs 5/8"!R 5/8"IR N `, 1 O S 6.y y1'4' 1 ?� • W/YPC"COOPER& ASSOC." W/YPC"COOPER& ASSOC." V ti �9� - - - y (SN (9943) �\ I a I 6y9- r BASIS DEI{R/� fSN 199431 I c- LrODD S�DM!SII 11 1 - , `" C` I I I ?cF /� 125.00 125.00 \ ma —� I • \ O O ^ 1 N 00°00.00"EI ,. I m or DDmOr E• 5/8.1R I -1- I I .I I 1 N W/YPC'WOLF SURVEYING INC" ' s s I I N (SN 278001 1 BLDG H o I (♦- I /J Nom. I 1 �P01 I ' 1 3 ( 1 N W I 1 • 0 I O� I 1 I / I I I - -� - - - -t . , I °o0 1 I 1 1 I N / /I I ( N I Q m �n -J� I ,� i i I I I �'N c I 1 1 - ' 1 1 1/2"IP DOWN 0.8 4 -3/4"IP DOWN 0.7- I 0 J I 1 1- 5/8"IR,/ / 1 SEE (SN 3414) I (SN 3414) ( I ..< I I W/YPC'WOLF SURVEYING INC" N 0.33 W 0.09 I 5 1.30 E 0.30 � 1 I I , I 1 (SN 278001 _ • 1 163.15 1 1 / • 61.85 a 60.00 1 142.60 . I•5 00°00'00"E IIEI17 / 264.45 N 0°00'00"E P�E / ..'„'c �Ecp, —.' EDGE OF PavEMENT St.6711I AYE S • 5/8"IR 29, o NO RECORD . S 30.22 W 29.90 FROM THE CALCULATED BLOCK CORNER ti BLOX B O Di!Ox 13 • ti LEGEND 3 ��' ,-I:1IV ,' I. JOE H. FERGUSON, CERTIFY O SET 5/8" x 30" IRON ROD w/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP 60 THAT THIS IS AN EXACT COPY STAMPED "WOLF SURVEYING INC" ON X-XX-99 or THE ORIGINAL PLAT. i,:;• • FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED SN SURVEY NUMBER. WASH. CO. SURVEY RECORDS W/YPC WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP RENEWAL DATE 12-31-99 DRAWN BY: PJM CHECKED BY:JHF CLIENT Wolf LAND SURVEYORS PROJECT NO.99194 f OF TRANSPORTATION III SE ME Ste• EOUIPAILNT: SOKK/A SET 4000 SER.x012263 TRANSPORTATION MILORD Surveying,Surveying,Inc, 97233 5111-0511f I 420• MEET idDF N I DATE "Mr Hi ISO SALEM.OR 97301 STEVEN L. MUM. PIS JOE H. FERGUSON. PLS PAUL J. MORIN. PLO LAWRENCE O. HART. PLO SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE a PARTITION PLAT NO. I. JOE H. FERGUSON. A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE DECLARATION. RECDRDED AS DOCUMENT NQ OF OREGON. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CORRECTLY SURVEYED AND KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS. THAT THE STATE OF OREGON. IN BLOCK 7 AND BLOCK 19 WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS MARKED WITH PROPER MONUMENTS. THE LAND REPRESENTED ON THIS BY AND THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, IS THE OWNER S.E. 1/4 SEC. 36, T. 1 S., R. 1 W., W.M., • PARTITI ION PLAI, BEING A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO TIME STATE OF THE LAND REPRESENTED ON THE ANNEXED MAP, MORE SPECIFICALLY CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON OF OREGON. BY AND THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAION, DESCRIBED IN THE ACCOMPANYING SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE AND THE THE BOUNDARIES OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING DECLARANT HAS CAUSED THE PARTI TION TO BE PREPARED AND THE AT THE INITIAL POINT, SAID INITIAL POINT BEING THE NORTHEAST PROPERTY PARTITIONED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CORNER OF LOT 26 BLOCK 17 WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS. AND BEING A ORS CHAPTER 92. APPROVALS a FOUND 5/8" x 30" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED COUNTY OF WASHINGTON "WOLF SURVEYING INC" ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE OF OREGON. THE I-5 INTERSTATE HIGHWAY: THENCE. S 5°02'16" W. A DISTANCE BY AND THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION APPROVED THIS DAY OF , OF 100.75 FEET TO A SET 5/8" X 30" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "WOLF SURVEYING INC"; THENCE, WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYOR S 25°40'03° W, 103.18 FEET TO A SET 5/8° X 30" IRON ROD WITH BY YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "WOLF SURVEYING INC"; THENCE, DEOLINDA G. JONES. RIGHT OF WAY MANAGER S 39°16'45" W. 64.74 FEET TO A SET 5/8" X 30" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "WOLF SURVEYING INC"; THENCE, S 54°04'29" W, 52.62 FEET 70 A SET 5/8" X 30" IRON ROD WITH ACKNOWLEDGMENT: YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "WOLF SURVEYING INC": THENCE. STATE OF OREGON S 65°48'00" W. 68.92 FEET TO A SET 5/8" X 30" IRON ROD W1114 S.S. APPROVED THIS DAY OF • YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "WOLF SURVEYING INC": THENCE. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON N 0°00'00" W. 264.45 FEET TO A FOUND 5/8" X 30" IRON ROD WITH DIRECTOR. DEPARTMENT OF LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION • YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "WOLF SURVEYING INC"; THENCE. KNOW ALL PEOPLE BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT ON N 90°00'00" C, 100.00 FEET 10 A SET 5/B" X 30" IRON ROD WITH THIS DAY OF . BEFORE ME. A NOTARY YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "WOLF SURVEYING INC"; THENCE, PUBLIC, IN AND FOR SAID STATE AND COUNTY, PERSONALLY APPEARED BY: N 0°00'00" E. 38.15 FEET TO A FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW DEOLINDA G. JONES, WHO BEING FIRST DULY SWORN DID SAY THAT SHE PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "COOPER 8 ASSOC."; THENCE, N 90°00'00" E, IS THE RICHT OF WAY MANAGER FOR THE STATE OF OREGON. DEPARTMENT 100.00 FEET TO THE INITIAL POINT. OF TRANSPORTATION, AND THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS VOLUNTARILY SIGNED , ON BEHALF OF THE STATE OF OREGON BY AUTHORITY DELEGATED TO HER. STATE OF OREGON 1 CONTAINS 41311.72 SOUARE FEET 10.95 ACRES) ISS SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON ) BEFORE ME THIS DAY NARRATIVE: I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PARTITION PLAT WAS RECEIVED THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO CREATE A PARCEL OF LAND. WHICH FOR RECORD ON THIS DAY OF • . HAS BEEN DEEMED AS EXCESS PROPERTY BY THE STATE OF OREGON, BY NOTARY PUBLIC AT O'CLOCK M., AND RECORDED IN THE COUNTY CLERK AND THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. THIS PROPERTY RECORDS. IS CREATED FROM THE I-5 INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM. THE SAID EXCESS PROPERTY IS COMPRISED OF WARRANTY DEED DOCUMENTS REFERENCE DOCUMENTS DEPUTY COUNTY CLERK BOOK 474 PAGE 287. BOOK 480 PAGE 461. BOOK 340 PAGE 285. AND A PLAT OF WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS 1800K PAGE WASH. CO. PLAT RECORDS) PORTION OF DEED DOCUMENT BOOK 340 PAGE 427• TOGETHER WITH CITY I OF TIGARD STREET VACATION ORDINANCE FOUND IN BOOK 340 PAGE 286, WASH. CO. SURVEY RECORDS: TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF FINAL JUDGEMENT CASE FILE NO. 24-7T4. SN 27800 SN 19943 SN 3414 ALL TAXES. FEES. ASSESSMENTS OR OTHER CHARGES AS PROVIDED THE SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY BOUNDARIES WERE SET AT LOCATIONS BY ORS 92.095 HAVE BEEN PAID AS OF REOUESTEO BY 0001. , APPROVALS: DIRECTOR OF ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION WASHINGTON COUNTY, THE NORTH BOUNDARY WAS DETERMINED HOLDING MONUMENTS SET AND CITY OF TIGARD OREGON FOUND IN SN 27800 AND PER WASH. CO. DEED DOC. ????????. APPROVED THIS DAY OF THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE WAS DETERMINED BY HOLDING THE WEST LINE BY: • OF BLOCK 7 AS DETERMINED IN SN 27800 AND PROJECTING IT SOUTH TO CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF TIGARD DEPUTY THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY. THE BASIS OF DEARING IS N 0°00'00" E AND HELD BETWEEN FOUND , MONUMENTS AS SHOWN AND PER SN 27800 STATE OF OREGON I ISS COUNTY OF WASHINGTON I APPROVED THIS DAY OF . PROFESSIONAL I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS TRACING IS A COPY CERTIFIED LAND SURVEYOR I. JOE H. FERGUSON. PLANNING DIRECTOR. CITY OF TIGARD TO ME. BY THE SURVEYOR OF THIS PARTITION PLAT. TO BE A TRUE CERTIFY THAT THIS IS AND EXACT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL, AND THAT IT WAS RECORDED ON AN EXACT COPY OF THE DAY OF . , AT O'CLOCK_M., n e», THE ORIGINAL PLAT. ' BY: IN THE COUNTY CLERK RECORDS. JOE K FEA�60N 7.115 RENEWAL DATE 12-31-99 DEPUTY COUNTY CLERK ' DRAWN BY: PJAI • PLAT NOTE: CHECKED BY:PO' CLIENT THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF LAND IRVEORS PROJECT NO.99194 CITY OF TIGARD DEPARTMENT OF LAND USE EDUIPMENI: SOKK/A SET 4000 SER.A012263 DEPT.OF AT AND TRANSPORTATION CASE FILE xxxxxxxxx MIN SE PDTf TRANSPORTATIOW BUILDING WOlf Ve}ing Inc JOBLANR OREMOII WrJ3 616-0554 SNEET i OF i DATE ADJUST la i SALEM OR 81'301 STEVEN L. L1UMA• PIS JOE H. FERGUSON. PLS PAUL J. MORIN, PLS LAWRENCE D. HART. PLS . ..:,. • ...1•••11 .4: . ;44,:•}41 •i':::* • :..•../.1. • 1 , ,......,"....., ' • ° •••.: ;.I: ..„...; ......: (•••••••'.i . 15""'"" . 0... .• : • , "a :"."",: i :•:•••:::.• • . 1 :::":a :, • • ' • • .. . ............................................. .. . . . . .............. • •• . • • •••• • • • ' •••'••:‘ • ••°'•' 1s* 4.:'''‘'.1":'s'••"°"•*••'"::"•:•::•:‘•1(°••1‘1*°*'`''•''''10 1`•••:°•.:0•%‘'•""is•‘..100 a 10,".::"."^-*""*""' s "'°:•s ' '` ' ' ''''a' ^'"•••a a a` a•:".'a""*.a.a'""a 00.;-• ' :: . • •• .•• . .• . 4 .. . . . • . .. • . ... ::: • : , .. .• . : " 'e ...- :• • 2 : • ••• .. ... La . am.... .• 2 a • . . . ..: .. IIIP • ' - ::. .. : ...T.-% .., •-•• • 4 4 . .. , . . ' F- . . • , i. (....; •••• .1. ......1 ..1.. .\../ ..1.. ::........: ‘,.t.....i ..........1...i...it.,,i i ) /1.....'...,:i!VI ..":1 .:.; :-..... ..:,. ""— ....i .....1 .:*.i ::.....1 1 ',.,/ : Z '4v1(° ••• , i....0 =— ,.. , Lai i'... CI •‘'•"°"""' • • . •••• ........ . 004 ,, • :. .. • .. 0 • .. •••• . .• ,:.: : •• . .. . : .. . . a ••• i...i •.", : • • • . . :• :. : 1 .. :, i::0 i I•:: a' "*" : ....; .0•' '.. ; ,- , . • - • 1 Li..1 :::• . ., • . .... • , :".,.. :"."`"" :' • „ . ' . . ,L•••• . .• , .• '■••'•••• ' ' ', :::: .. •• • .• • i : ........ .• .': I •• : • • • • .. : . . . ,. ,. , ., :••:. - • •., • - .- :: • • . • 1- :•• . ' • •• ' • ' • , ' • • , •• • •*" ••...•,:':: 1 ""' • I, • . ••• . . . . .• . :: : 1 :•••0" . •i: . n • „ • • • •,.• , :.• . .. .. .: . , . 1 : >.: • •- "0.•„:"D•0•1.7:10100 i.4 i 2..9 .1,A.::::::. • • ,, • . .„; . . . . . . • , ... . . , .......... . , . ,. • . ... .. . •• . ,. .. . . , . : : • : .. 1.•,•• ... , :: • i • • • • , • .., . . . • •••• :• , 1 .. ...; • • • : • •• :A.: :‘ „.., .. • , ... • ., •• .•::„::. ,, ,.. :; .• ......,,, • • • :. , :• . . •• .* :11-y: ":•• ....: ..: I • ......:',:::;1 • '.. : • ,: • • •••• • I .. : •• . co • . ••• :••:•. • csj . . • . • .. ;.. ...:„,.. ‘. .• , . .• . . . . . . • • • •• , . . .. .. .. . . . • , . . .. .. ... • ..• •• • • , ....„ .• .......:3 r44 RI 4:-.:44:is\tct 4,-- • . (..:., - • Li 4 1,4 44.....4 •'•'\fAi.'.....:: .......: ..., . „ •••• ' •• • • . . •., ....., . .• :. ,...1) ' , 1 • :. .., • • . • ••• •• .. . .;• . • .. . . : : . *. •.. . . . ., .. . Mf ` r,; :;.. �a x ^'*a :�`°h�$ a; „4.>—.. A„. �_ � .z.As4 �TM. �°`g4"�"'`".aaa.#>i .�� «� .�Fi 1' a S :.;la,.a 1,4104''* � tats�, •4C.,� amd .i �„ 's 7;:-F f V z:'OW~ ik'Y r'5r "..�.c1 r }� ya.:.i&K' r. J3.MH"a^ .+F 3, � PRE�ALICATIOHCOHFERENC = HOES e • `� tY ,T, ..._,..r:P ,' a 3tgn....t �'�' `± ''Di111A1[ a t,. i i'x ,r--- ��� � a� 1� T v^� �.t�� � � ... `� ,..`- S � `M��... wk���a�,�S°, � �1f1�111La F = [Prro-Application.Meeting Notes are Valid for S x(61 Months 'w e� is �m§ NON-RESIDENTIAL PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: k • STAFF AT PRE-APP.: . APPLICANT: AGENT: Phone:[ l G 1 -- 3.14-4-11-- Phone: [ l PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN.LOCATION: 3 3T C�-I Ave --S TAX MAP[Sl/LOT#[Sl: S1-•• e3 �� NECESSARY APPLICATION[S): c-ci-ricx�l PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: -Pc- ZCL of C.-MD fA►1 c c S S c�c c R c r -o- wit/ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN f MAP DESIGNATION: 4%-)A is ) elviActAeql. ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: C.I.T.AREA: FACILITATOR: PHONE: [503) ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS KA, rue aet-vH L MINIMUM LOT SIZE: ft. 6,vetabe lot width: ft. Maximum building height:ft. Setbacks: Front ft. Side ft. Rear ft. Corner ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: %. [Refer to Code Section 18. c 0 .21 - - 7-obizNIc7 stcNNVINis -tid(1e7 c- k s ,ks g S• or C , t-6127.- ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement: The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. (Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 NON-Neskintlal ApplIeatloa/Plaanlag OMsloa Section SPECIAL SETBACKS N C k • D STREETS: feet from the centerline of D LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. D FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7301 SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS BUOt@fN HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 -- • ovided that: D A maximum building •• ea to site area ratio (FAR)of 1.5 to 1 will exist; D All actual building setbacks will • - - east half('/Z) of the building's height; and > The structure will not abut a residential z d district. [Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.BJ PARKING AND ACCESS N/(1,6c nlb REQUIRED parking for this type of use: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parki • SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MOR= THAN 40°• of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. PARKING STA S shall be dimensioned as follows: D Standard parki • space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. > Compact parking s o ace dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parkin• space width includes the width of a stripe that separate he parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum • three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included a •art of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for m -ting the minimum percentage requirements. [Refer to Code Section 18.765.040] Handicapped Parking: ------ - - . > All parking areas shall PROVIDE A' 'ROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. •e minimum number of disabled person parking • spaces to be provided,as well as the parking s •II dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available pon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surfac- •nd an appropriate sign shall be posted. D BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAM Y, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas o otected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Minimum number of accesses: Minimu .ccess width: Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking . eas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: [Refer to Code Chapters 18.765 and 18.7051 CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 NON-SesIdeatlal APPUeatloa/Planoleg OMslaa Section WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and indus ial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide conven -nt connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complex.s. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. [Refe o Code Section 18.105.030] LOADING AREA REQUIREM TS Every COMMER• AL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a lo.•ing space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. [Refer to Code Se on 18.765.080] . CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that CL •R VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT . road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area •epends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.79 BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AN i TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacen developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas a gng certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. : ffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must . so achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences =y also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer .reas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information o' required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.745] The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are applic-ble to your proposal area are as follows: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQ RED ALONG: , LANDSCAPING STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPME S FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 1 1 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private prope ' within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary: Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at leas. two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 4c feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Furthe information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPA• S MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effe,t. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parkin• lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorati - walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and a•cesses. [Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.165 and 18.705] CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON4esldentlal*puIlcatloa/Plaaeluv Division Section SIGNS 'OBTAINED SIGN PERMITS MUST PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tiga d. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or heigh beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of.a develo ent review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review b fore the Hearings Officer. [Re rto Code Chapter 18380) - SENSITIVE LANDS The Code prov es REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMEN DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAY „ WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF. 25 PERCENT; OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas. and their boundaries. is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. . Chapter 18.84 also provides regulations for the use, rotection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEV: OPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. [Refer to Code Chapter 1; 5) STEEP SLOPES • When STEEP SLOPES exist, p 'or to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the a••royal standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report all be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for a chieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY[USA]BUFFER STANDAR;S,R&0 96-44 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO .ENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enou 0 h to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR SHALL BE A ' INIMUM OF 25-FEET-WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive a -a, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion • the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the ve•-tated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated co ridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corrido within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: - - - - - . NO structures, development, construction activities, garo ens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities sh- I be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated co 'dor, except as allowed below: > A GRAVEL WALKWAY OR BIKE PATH, NOT EXCEEDING EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor st be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be co tructed closer than ten (10) feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by th- Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to - fisting vegetation; and > WATER QUALITY FACILITIES may encroach into the vegetated c• ridor a maximum of ten (10) feet with the approval of the Agency or City. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE P■ -GELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor s all be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. [Refer to R&0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SWMI CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NON-Bosldeatla•Applieatloo/Planala0 Division Section • WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRI( The W•TER RESOURC (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Compr: ,ensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation . of signs . t wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while • establishin clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit . developme in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capa••ty; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildll - habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLA I ISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Re •urces) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). Th:se provisions require that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped .• "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual fl• less than 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs). ➢ Major streams in Tigard • elude FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIB ' ARY CREEKS)AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEAR G STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard includ: Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tribu :ries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR TH. EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). ➢ The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPA- •N SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. > The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBA. K IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STR •MS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quali buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administere' by the City of Tigard. [Refer to Code Section 18197.0301 - - • Riparian Setback Reductions The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUC •N OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH • S 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this ch.•ter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured throw, streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparl n setback area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the appl -nt must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regu -tion was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetation Study required by -ction 18.85.050.C. that demonstrates all of the following: > Native plant species currently cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; > The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; > That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.85.050 regulating removal of native plant species; CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 NONaesldeatlei ApptlesUoa/Pleaalap OMsloa Section ➢ That there will be• ifringement into the 100-year floods and ➢ The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. • (Refer to Code Section 18.797.100] TREE REMOVAL 'LAN REQUIREMENTS A TREE PAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified . borist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a developm- t application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned developme or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE P► • N SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identifi :tion of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as signifi•.nt by the City; ➢ ldentificatio• of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Miti•.tion must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the followino standards: • Retaina•- of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation •rogram according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage •f from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of he trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; b Retainage of om 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the tree . to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75'0 or greater of existing trees over. 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees w 'oh are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defini • standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after instruction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE P. RIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will •e inventoried as part of the tree plan- above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.0.I.D. (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.0 MITIGATION REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take pla - according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substanti. ly similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species o the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replace sent with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replac:ment with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees requt ed shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removes or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement tr:-s. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the 0 irector may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other prope . within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private prope ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in - manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this s ction, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its co s in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.0 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 K011-Oasld•ntlal Applicatlon/Plaanta RMslon Sutton • NARRATIVE The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which providefindings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.32] • CODE CHAPTERS / 18.330 / 18.390 /8.520 _ 18.715 _ 18.765 _ 18.795 _ 18.350 ✓18.420 _ 18.530 _ 18.730 18.775 _ 18.797 _ 18.360 _ 18.430 _ 18.620 18.745 _ 18.780 _ 18.800 18.370 18.510 - 18.705 18.755 18.790 - IMPA STUDY - part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMP A • STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the developm- on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation s - , including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system an. -- noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall p •e.se improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development o •e public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the -a munity Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either it- ifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion th- • - real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the develop - i t. [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050] NEIGHS I OOD MEETING T APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE AP"OPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUB •MMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the me- in. date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting a • the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application ill not be accepted. [Refer t the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RE VATION PRIOR TO SUBMI • ING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, applicant's are require. to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Off'.- in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not be -.cepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of e Subdivision Name Reservation. - (County Surveyor's Office: 03-648-8884] BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OT R RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be gr• ted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-ap.lication notes do not include comments from the Building. Division. For proposed buil• gs or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Di ion Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the tructure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and or Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SEC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is reco •ed, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued • the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN HICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). • CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 9 NON-BesldantlallspllcaUoa/Plaonlag OMslao Section RECYCLING Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7551 ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: t z r«/y a w tS O�N�P S '761041 _ P� 'am -Tt Mn e of f�C f U.:0\ e I �� Mea,T *IIC ' *. ICLE )€:/%4 SNg■01‘P: S ..).17-(1, 601 -+� S t T k Cmtsk, • A6Ztc +vT-ugh ik- ,M�`�- • c—e5 Ei.il& ( Lt�c,�.)c,�.1 c� --l�cr�' or•.4 $. PROCEDURE / Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. . • APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at.Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 8'/Z" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard tEt JUcjS . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-iasIdeatlalApplicatIon/Plaaoing Division Section This PRE-APPLICATIONOONFERENCE AND THE NOTE*F THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff • and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staffto provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: `�� �' A* CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP.MEETING PHONE: (5031 639-4171 FAX: [5031684-7297 E-MAIL csiggf.x.t.nameaciligard.orms M,r . . • i:\curpin\masters\revi sed\prea ppc.mst (Engineering section:preapp.eng)\ Updated: Jun.7,99 CITY(*TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NON-BesIdeotlsl A0011catlae/Plsnuln0 atwlsloa Section PRE AftLICATION.CO NFERENCLiOTES ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q w" ° ° °°° com414'4.et eroj inent Siapiz BetterConnnunity 15 I "z,Q. PP PUBLIC FACILITIES 4t kkoo of The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: -- - - - ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb El storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. • CITY OF TIGARII Pre-A tincatfon Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Eaglneettag Oegattmeat Section l J street Improver t iCr rlb Will uc i ICUCaaar y arur iy • to include: • • ❑ feet of pavement El concrete-curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities • ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2.) (' 41 Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applcatlon Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Eagteeettao Depettmeut Section are on me opposite sloe or me street Irorrl uie sne. n the lee in-lieu Is prupubuU, IL IS equal to $ 27.50 per lineal fill f street frontage that contains th• )rhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW . Prior to - , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. N(A, fS QE-r 2 Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) e) inch line which is located 5� (..9-1A\ -_ . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to • Water Supply: (Sr, Pot s� The ,, ,,t \J ld - s-ruL-r - Phone:(503) 751)1 provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the.City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75)which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Apoltcatlon Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineerlug Bepartment Section newly creates impervious surraces. i ne resolution contains a provision uiat WOUIU auuw an applicant to-pay a fee in-lieu of cons ting an on-site facility provided spfic criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determinin�rhether or not the fee in-lieu will b rfered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: (. Construction of an on-site water quality facility. (vA*,..1 --(*S.� ( ) Payment of the fee in-lieu. • Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. - - ($ PERMITS -- Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. • CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Appncatlon Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering leperimentSection in aaaition, me permirree will oe requireu lV t.JU L d OUIIU Vr b11111IClr IIIIQIIti1Q1 Jet:uirly ror me work. • • Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. • Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially • complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section GtiAU1Mla PLAN Ift4UIREMENTS FOB`lIBUIVI5IUN All subdivision projects sha•quire a proposed grading plan priared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer • will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each • homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: ut I'VT( ENGINEERING DEP TMENT STAFF Phone: (5031639-4171 Fax: (5031684-1297 h:\patty\masters\preapp.eng (Master section:preapp-r.mst) 04-March-1999 CRY OF UGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Ealt111eer1nI Department Section • , .: • LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLUsT - :�1 t- '} " Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503)639-4171. Staff: 4∎KM Date: 6Ac `� t l • 1. BASIC INFORMATION • ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: • Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed 0 Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed envelopes and a notarized list of all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be legal-size, addressed with 1"x 4"labels Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION(Section 5 of this -checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): ;Vicinity Map ❑ Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan PIK Existing Conditions Map. ❑ Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan • LW Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan ❑ Site Development Plan ❑ Architectural Drawings ❑ Landscape Plan ❑ Sign Drawings ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES /'J . COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. l Ci City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 i • DEAN SMITH&Jo Ann Smith RICK&JANETTE HUG 17880 Sarah Hill Ln Dale Deridder Lake Oswego,OR 97035 10500 SW Greenburg Rd Tigard,OR 97223 DORIS VANGORDON DIANE NOW BALDWIN LARSON 14430 SW 94Th Ct 3422 241St Ave SE Tigard,OR 97224 Issaquah,WA 98029 JUDY LORRAINE LARSON&Strojny Now - EDWARD CASEY JR. &Patrick Casey 555 Chestertown St PO Box 1898 Gaithersburg,MD 20878 Clackamas,OR 97015 PHILIP&REBECCA GOOLD RANDY MCNEILL 11670 SW 67Th Ave 11700 SW 67Th Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Portland,OR 97223 ANNE LEISER JAMES&CORA CORLISS 6009 SW Pendleton Ct PO Box 23970 Portland,OR 97221 Tigard,OR 97281 IRVIN&JENNIE LARSON HARRIET HOGG 555 Chestertown St 6860 SW Clinton St Gaithersburg,MD 20878 Tigard,OR 97223 GORDON ROOT&Wilma Root DONALD&JULIA GAIL POLLOCK 2413 Remington Dr 1834 SW 58Th Ave#202 r West Linn,OR 97068 Portland,OR 97221 State of OREGON } } County of Multnomah } I certify that the above list includes all the owners of property within 500 ft.of certain Oregon Department of Transportation property that is subject to a Land Partition Application to the City of Tigard, OR Carl V. Toland Dated: A-y4ti / g , 1999 0 OFFICIAL SEAL / . rte_. ar.rr PHYWS CLARK �`�: NOTARY PUBLIC-004 ' COMMISSION N0.323550 Notary Publ c-State of Oregon 4 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 18,2003 4 My Commission Expires: S/16/o 3 / 36TISRIWW.M. 1 JbVU OREGON I OUNT'Y N `- 1"y 100' G. f A b' •A. _E MAP x 64. •° q. 0 ry CANCELLED TAX LOTS • 0 1 36DA t n ,�� 300,2601,4200,4500,4600, w t�P' ^' 4700,3401,8101,8400,5800, _ft, • 8601,3002,7000,4300, m -- T ---. + g�' 4400,5200,3201,3404,5301, 6600,5901, 3003, • / �'STA. 39+10.23 P.O.C. S.W. •r- 1 22949 / 9 . _-�- H A I NS ,/'�.��..�.[".'S.... STREET�.�-...__�,. ...... / •,. - /29.47 / S o � STREET .,�`,� � �,�,�,�'' - �-q J 99e710 �� p q- I � 89 90 pe 1 24. O I 30 I f /r � ''''.S"`a'�a. -70000, �, 7 200, - 100100' "I �- STA. 40+00.00 s�' ��({ .' r��. I -i V ,, FeV ' .29 AC N 6.3o .32 AC. 47Ac, h o� "' I ; 4C. 22 N +STA.I +49.343 - 22 �- o L ) Z ,4 .. . --. ' ,:, -(C.S.21,831) - PT. - N� m I • < / ,,•-•,:,,,;..:-; ,;: " s0' kr 21 N w N 4 21 N Hv3 a , ?, - '- ,J - '� `�2 OJ I •/'r� • fie '.,`�, > 20 N z N 5 20 N i •�• ;,' ' k,��'•fi.r.t;.�,�'y r;'�> 3':-I 3 N N r 18 na /. ..' � � 1k _ •i•:;;. '.a. ` N Q 301 .06 AC. 600 • $ - STA. 41+81.52 ° µ , :+ - 17 N N a 400 .0640 •.444c. ' iN W I -. T T I I =W. Q }}. .3- 8L.T r� _- _ Q-O :,;.4.;.• !2 13 14 I 16°0_ �9 I _-U- 12� 13. 14 ° ~ Cn. . . ': , .^r'. •; •-:::,a�tS_...,.'.•: ', ,, r . 5 0' 15 1691 1' n 4 :''s: ,. �: !, -:r: . .; :,...: :,.• t;,::: 51. 25' 125'125' 125' 125'a - 625' 1 25'1 25' 1 25' 25' 125'1 25'1 25'1 30 L . .. : ''`' ,:. • `;5;. 't,.,,,,.;.,.%;-.;$:...%, ,�,:4 :,�i. , /•� STREET , `'%.;' (U, \ '> . .,::. ;',',r.g.•:,: ., . i / '''''.+'',,'i'L::•r`•;ti'} ,b.`, ',,,�-- �1-I1�y1;t.'.1rt.a,.., •`- .. ,*:,,,. ., t. ..ti i 2e 2e f 15' 26 25 25'125 126 25 125'125 125 I 25 i 30' _ •�;':. ; JLtr M,i: -'... W 7-.4 4 7 ,?,:,l:)4 ian ,:.4: .,?,-.: 3301 3900 3800 '' ,... u,',a 16 AC. o o ./7AC. /.2/AC. o +STA. 43+92.88. ?`:-' +�;; a ;.`''r" :i .fi': ., 4 5 6 7 482 21 2 3 4 5 6 7 82 {- :. :'s` ` I I 1 1 1 --I o , . 'A.:,•:''.,`;;-:"r ;,> °_ . ,.,..:"7..;:, ;s . N i%s.•. + 36 N 4000 _ 'ID 36 ' a ,y,:; :: ,;4'.1,';':= t',;:;_._ 35 '' rA;; 4a '. ; - 29 AC. & �_r + ,- N - -•1 m m } STA. 48+00.00 \ "-`v"'Ab:,•:,:: k;F;--. a �.3 ' ' -L, •- 3700 N •'‘,•;;',.•,•,;•';'. 1!',,,:': .i...';..:° ' y Z .1'.:.. (1�}d - 1tJ , ' , � .�a �, n 13 32 n 3 ,. hf=' 4, 81 : v� N 100 - /'• -_- ^i f .... l- i t ��•a yr„+o,rl ° •".�,� _. l ir, 4.k . 31 N N 4100 (-� 31 N p + o S W.s :; a'..,."''., • 3600 , U) ;" .4/AC. n .SOUTHVIEW= T;;`:`'W:..41;- " so' N -., 30 N i' -1 STREETs;:ti 4".:, 1• 3408 17 28 ' ..: ., .� • ./2 AC - ---, -i .� ' ,..1,i'-`: .Y ,x N 18 _L, oo' N •, . 3400 �����. 123• A3 'ti• , • 23 AC. 340/4.7 g,o AO S,A� r :.�;. 22 23 24 25 26 a �_ L1_i / 5 -1`4 5 / 480/461 t f_e- -1 in w ®p 5 25' 25'1 2S' 125'1 25', 1 1 1 I Oi 1 1 .1 1, CC + `4.. `... 4? o • �- STREET- VACATION % g-U u.� S R E E 88 9837 0 ti 2S' 25 125 25 125'0 j T T T T T T T 1 r I v., r,L 1..., 5300 0 '1 .44 AC. - I + tr it, 4 5 6 7 82 cC24-774 / L I I 1 1 L /+ 1 1 1 Y J� { z 6000 r ::'{,t , •.' ..? /t: N 0 + STA. 50+00.00 / ��p . /1 .,; "t,: i I 1 t,:. s i.i, 3 ice': r' '; ' ;: ` 1 LL l CC41-144 `, - . �\ ,',;j} .i'K ..'f 5900 � }:.,,: y'c,' Q ,....,:-.1:,..,...;. oa FOR.': ASSESSMENT..1 Cc41-144 -4 f" • + "I PURPOSES ' ONLY -1 N 488/167 + 50-45786 -1 __ D0" NOT RELY- ON•,.• + FOR ANY OTHER USE :C 41-145 1- - I . 1 + CC24-585 1 �, ,''� • 10-46788 i^ ,J z N ////1111 r' 4800 T 10 • T. N� I 04 I 1 N T 1 �, + 36 3� `;t::'• .',• '_. S.W. i,tt T P' "S 5800 4900 5000 i 4 ° DOUG A S ` .45 AC I W N .24 AC .15 AC. 5100 I STR & s N• HI C.,I(•)N : ()11mT ,1 (CS. 20,793) o a ∎ 2 ./9 AC. DEJ'ART1 :•• 22 23 24 25 2-6-1-'> m 1 19 20 21 22 23 '24 ' I ASC1 Cc411 nT1 ` ,'I', •30 30 I • •' • ' • . +_ I 6 N V U l/�4 638 A �j.i-<.•1 -25_25'.1.2.5.1251.125,4 A-25125_25 125_25 125'129 p :• (C.S. 19,416) (C.S. 20,789). •u, , . C� 1 ';• VACATED 1_L -� , •..i,:.r_' _.i:4 / ��AS5+.h5Ff.'1 673/412 / + '�NI.Y•�C.)NC''`'t u:i �� . --� S•W. - DOUGLAS T I G & RD MLF / ? 9 - 60013 MAPS PARTITION PLAT NO. SURVEYOR ' S CERTIFICATE : RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. I , JOE H . FERGUSON , A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR I N THE STATE DECLARATION e 1' 1�' BLOCK 7 AND BLOCK 14 WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS OF OREGON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CORRECTLY SURVEYED AND KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS , THAT THE STATE OF OREGON , MARKED WITH PROPER MONUMENTS . THE LAND REPRESENTED ON THIS BY AND THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION , IS THE OWNER S.Q. 1/4 SEC. 36, T. 1 S., R. 1 W., W.M., PART I T I I ON PLAT , BEING A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF THE LAND REPRESENTED ON THE ANNEXED MAP , MORE SPECIFICALLY CITY OF TIGARD, NASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON OF OREGON , BY AND THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAION , DESCRIBED IN THE ACCOMPANYING SURVEYOR ' S CERTIFICATE AND THE tH1= biHUNb AN I E UH WH f tH Aif E HEttN I bEH f--\ ULLUWt : t EH I NN 1 NH HEtLA ANt HA1 HUH Al= t I t i UN tU bE HNEHANEH ANb tHE AT THE INITIAL POINT . SAID INITIAL POINT BEING THE NORTHEAST PROPERTY PARTITIONED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CORNER OF LOT 26 BLOCK 17 WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS , AND BEING A ORS CHAPTER 92 . APPROVALS FOUND 5/8" x 30" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED COUNTY OF WASHINGTON "WOLF SURVEYING INC" ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE OF OREGON , THE I -5 INTERSTATE HIGHWAY ; THENCE , S 5°02 ' 16" W , A DISTANCE BY AND THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION APPROVED THIS DAY OF 9 OF 100075 FEET TO A SET 5/8" X 30" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "WOLF SURVEYING INC THENCE , WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYOR S 25 ° 40 ' 03" W. 103018 FEET TO A SET 5/8" X 30" IRON ROD WITH BY YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED 'WOLF SURVEYING INC" ; THENCE , DEOLINDA G . JONES , RIGHT OF WAY MANAGER S 39° 16 ' 45" W. 64 . 74 FEET TO A SET 5/8" X 30" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "WOLF SURVEYING INC THENCE . S 54°04 / 29" W, 52 . 62 FEET TO A SET 5/8" X 30" IRON ROD WITH ACKNOWLEDGMENT YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "WOLF SURVEYING INC" : THENCE , STATE OF OREGON S 65 °48 ' 00" W, 68092 FEET TO A SET 5/8" X 30" IRON RCD WITH S . S . APPROVED THIS DAY OF 9 YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "WOLF SURVEYING INC" ; THENCE , COUNTY OF WASHINGTON N 0°00 ' 00" W , 264045 FEET TO A FOUND 5/8" X 30" IRON ROD WITH DIRECTOR . DEPARTMENT OF LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "WOLF SURVEYING INC" ; THENCE , KNOW ALL PEOPLE BY THESE PRESENTS , THAT ON N 90°00 ' 00" E , 100000 FEET TO A SET 5/8" X 30" IRON ROD WITH THIS DAY OF 9 , BEFORE ME , A NOTARY YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "WOLF SURVEYING INC THENCE , PUBLIC , IN AND FOR SAID STATE AND COUNTY , PERSONALLY APPEARED BY N 0°00 ' 00" E . 38015 FEET TO A FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW DEOLINDA G . JONES , WHO BEING FIRST DULY SWORN DID SAY THAT SHE PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "COOPER & ASSOC . THENCE , N 90°00 ' 00" E , IS THE RIGHT OF WAY MANAGER FOR THE STATE OF OREGON , DEPARTMENT 100° 00 FEET TO THE INITIAL POINT . OF TRANSPORTATION , AND THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS VOLUNTARILY SIGNED ON BEHALF OF THE STATE OF OREGON BY AUTHORITY DELEGATED TO HER. STATE OF OREGON ) CONTAINS 41311072 SQUARE FEET ( 0 . 95 ACRES ) ) SS SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO , COUNTY OF WASHINGTON ) BEFORE ME THIS DAY NARRATIVE : I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PARTITION PLAT WAS RECEIVED THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO CREATE A PARCEL OF LAND . WHICH FOR RECORD ON THIS DAY OF 9 9 HAS BEEN DEEMED AS EXCESS PROPERTY BY THE STATE OF OREGON , BY NOTARY PUBLIC AT O ' CLOCK M. , AND RECORDED IN THE COUNTY CLERK AND THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. THIS PROPERTY RECORDS . IS CREATED FROM THE 1 -5 INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM. THE S A I D EXCESS PROPERTY I S COMPRISED OF WARRANTY DEED DOCUMENTS REFERENCE DOCUMENTS BOOK 474 PAGE 287 , BOOK 480 PAGE 461 , BOOK 340 PAGE 286 , AND A c EPUTY COUNTY CLERK PLAT OF WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS ( BOOK PAGE WASH . CO.CO PLAT RECORDS ) PORTION OF DEED DOCUMENT BOOK 340 PAGE 427 , TOGETHER WITH CITY OF TIGARD STREET VACATION ORDINANCE FOUND IN BOOK 340 PAGE 286 , WASH . CO. SURVEY RECORDS : TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF FINAL JUDGEMENT CASE FILE NO. 24 -774 . SN 27800 5N 19943 SN 3411 ALL TAXES , FEES , ASSESSMENTS OR OTHER CHARGES AS PROVIDED THE SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY BOUNDARIES WERE SET AT LOCATIONS BY ORS 92 . 095 HAVE BEEN PAID AS OF 9 REQUESTED BY ODOT . APPROVALS o DIRECTOR OF ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION WASHINGTON COUNTY , THE NORTH BOUNDARY WAS DETERMINED HOLDING MONUMENTS SET AND C I TY OF T I GARD OREGON FOUND IN SN 27800 AND PER WASH . CO . DEED DOC . ??????? APPROVED THIS DAY OF 9 THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE WAS DETERMINED BY HOLDING THE WEST LINE BY : OF BLOCK 7 AS DETERMINED IN SN 27800 AND PROJECTING IT SOUTH TO CITY ENGINEERS CITY OF TIGARD DEPUTY THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY . THE BASIS OF BEARING IS N 0°00 ' 00" E AND HELD BETWEEN FOUND MONUMENTS AS SHOWN AND PER SN 27800 STATE OF OREGON ) ) SS COUNTY OF WASHINGTON ) r REGISTERED APPROVED THIS DAY OF 9 PROFESSIONAL I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS TRACING IS A COPY CERTIFIED LAND SURVEYOR I , JOE H . FERGUSON , PLANNING DIRECTOR , CITY OF TIGARD TO ME , BY THE SURVEYOR OF THIS PARTITION PLAT , TO BE A TRUE CERTIFY THAT THIC IS AND EXACT COPY OF THE ORIGINALS AND THAT IT WAS RECORDED ON AN EXACT COPY OF THE DAY OF 9 9 AT O ' CLOCK M. , OREGON THE ORIGINAL PLAT . BY : IN THE COUNTY CLERK RECORDS . JULY 25,1990 JOE H. FERGUSON 2445 , RENEWAL DATE 12-31-99 DEPUTY COUNTY CLERK DRAWN BY : PJM PLAT NOTE : CHECKED BY e JKF CLIENT T H I S PLAT I S SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF LAND SURVEYORS PROJECT NO. 99194 CITY OF TIGARD DEPARTMENT OF LAND USE OREGON DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION 18428 S.E. PINE STREET Eau] P ME N T e 30KKI A SET 4000 SER. #01 2263 420 TRANSPORTATION BUILDING AND TRANSPORTATION C A S E F I L E x x.x x x x x x x Surveying,Inc. PORTLAND, OREGON 97233 618-0564 SHEET 2 OF 2 DATE AUGUST 10, 1999 SALEM, OR 97301 STEVEN L . MUMA9 PLS JOE H. FERGUSON, PLS PAUL J . MORIN, PLS LAWRENCE D. HART, PLC AA I p iqqfpow/3 PARTITION PLAT NO. RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. INTERSTATE 5 IN BLOCK 7 AND BLOCK 14 WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS S.F. 1/4 SEC. 36, T. 1 S., R. 1 W., W.M., SCALE: 1" = 30' 0 15 30 45 CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON \ 100.75 , r S 5°02'16" ki/ i (.0 N -703 / _J L '• s 'c°S •7c5) (31ro / N <<':NN o __ S>, \1 6 \6) o 9 60.00 J 0 6 0 <1,L_' o • , \-- s:) \--P„ BLOCK 7 ... sz ,N<c,, e6 \---, - \,*,, HELD HELD (I) .• 1- ---r.,c, 0., \;\ --x 5/8 IR 5/8" IR c.\\\ Q LLJ ,S' 6' -57 ,_)-' •---' --9 ,''' 4- W/YPC "COOPER & ASSOC." W/YPC "COOPER & ASSOC." 1-- so 57 .-- \ (SN 19943) (SN 19943) 0<\ ;\ v z a-- _ \-/- \±- BASIS OF BEARING , -,, \\"<<-- - -- 250.00 SOUTH (SN 27800) -. , / — — — '‘ , , 125.00 125.00 38.15 • \ , , \\\i- - 4 • / , \ r -, \ N 00°00'00'1 E 1 . 03 N 00°00'00" E 5/8- IR / '1- , ,0 N W/YPC "WOLF SURVEYING INC" s Lc , cv / BLOCK 14 (SN 27800) \--0 / e3 // Lc) 0* , - . - s-Ci c W / / 1 • - \ ; / / (:), CI) <) \ ) 0 8 / 0 . / (: Q3' 6 6 0 i p 0 ,z) , / cm — c c: \J ...., 0 / / om cl (z) // / v) A\ / / 7) / / 0 / J 1/2" IF DOWN 0.8 3/4" IP DOWN 0.7 , c 5/8" IR ,/ / / SEE (SN 3414) j (SN 3414) -- - / W/YPC "WOLF SURVEYING INC" , 7 N 0.33 W 0.09 S 1.30 E 0.30 163.15 (5N 27800) 7 i _,- ,. 61.85 60.00 142.60 : . • S 00°00'00" E ,--\\lc,\a 7v 1 264.45 N 0°00'00" E --- ---p,\IE 7 ) -..----(f / _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ - -----.90,— z I EDGE OF PAVEMENT I \ \ S.W. 67TH AVE. 0 o • 5/8" IR 29/ c2) NO RECORD cS <0 S 30.22 W 29.90 FROM THE CALCULATED BLOCK CORNER k: (J) BLOCK 8 I o I BLOCK 13 1-- .-, ---J REGISTERED (_) PROFESSIONAL LEGEND (A LAND SURVEYOR I , JOE H . FERGUSON , CERTIFY , 60' 0 SET 5/8 x 30" IRON ROD W/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP THAT THIS IS AN EXACT COPY - STAMPED -WOLF SURVEYING INC- ON X-XX-99 OF THE ORIGINAL PLAT . JULRE2r1990 • FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED JOE H. FENGUSON SN SURVEY NUMBER , WASH . CO. SURVEY RECORDS 2445 , W/YPC WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP RENEWAL DATE 12-31-99 DRAWN BY: PJM CHECKED BY UHF CLIENT IlAiolf LAND SURVEYORS PROJECT NO. 99194 OREGON DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION 18428 S.E. PINE STREET H UI PMENT: SOKKIA SET 4000 SER. #012263 420 TRANSPORTATION BUILDING Surveying,Inc. PORTL AND, OREGON 97233 618-0564 , SHEET 7 OF 2 DATE AUGUST 10, 1999 SALEM, OR 97301 STEVEN L. MUMA, PLS JOE H. FERGUSON, PLS PAUL J . MORIN, PLS LAWRENCE D. HART, PLS • • CITY OFTICARD A .n PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES D Community#DeveCopment [Pre-Application Meeting)440 are Valid for Six 161 Months) A s A Be�erCommumty NON-RESIDENTIAL PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: 1" 11_ STAFF AT PRE-APP.: AGENT: Phone:1 1 'i1/4 '13� BL(4-41- Phone: I l PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN.LOCATION: TAX MAPISL/LOT NECESSARY APPLICATION[Sl: Qd'�-ri-ric�l PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: -D' UM i CJZ 1E --Pr- (bat/Z(2 of (_4iJ `Fiibkil a.,+. •. , T - •, - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ��ic•67 , eNlaa�u fl ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: kk C.I.T.AREA: FACILITATOR: PHONE: (5031 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS dkAZ" L ' aammacht MINIMUM LOT SIZE: ft. age lot width:_ft. Maximum building height: 49 ft. Setbacks: Front ft. Side ft. Rear ft. Corner ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: %. (Refer to Code Section 18.c&20 .21 - — ZoKtI4 svdit cs.& ttek (Aka- S teret0 AGS- or C AM- LL G.. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement: The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2'/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. [Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 NOM-Besidentlal Appiicatlon/Planning Division Section SPECIAL SETBACKS i ( > STREETS: feet from the centerline of > LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. ➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. (Refer to Code Chapter 183301 SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS • BU i HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 -- • ovided that: ➢ A maximum building •• - ea to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; > All actual building setbacks will •- - least half('/) of the building's height; and ➢ The structure will not abut a residential z d district. (Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.BJ PARKING AND ACCESS t b `s Pr-e%"; REQUIRED parking for this type of use: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parks • SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MOR. THAN 40°. of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. PARKING STA S shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parki : space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. > Compact parking s.ace dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parkin• space width includes the width of a stripe that separate he parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum : three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included a •art of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for m=-ting the minimum percentage requirements. (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040) Handicapped Parking: ➢ All parking areas shall PROVIDE A' 'ROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. •e minimum number of disabled person parking • spaces to be provided, as well as the parking s .11 dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available pon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surfac- -nd an appropriate sign shall be posted. ➢ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAM Y, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas • otected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Minimum number of accesses: Minimu .ccess width: Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking . eas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: (Refer to Code Chapters 18.765 and 18.705) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning OMsloo Section • • • WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and indus ial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide conven -nt connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complex_s. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighborin a developments. (Rafe o Code Section 18.705.0301 LOADING AREA REQUIREM TS Every COMMER• AL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a lo.•ing space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Se on 18.765.080) CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that CL A R VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT . road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area •epends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.79 BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AN►' TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacen developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas a Ong certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. : ffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must . so achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences :y also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer .yeas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information o required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1451 The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are applic ble to your proposal area are as follows: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQ RED ALONG: LANDSCAPING STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPME S FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than lb I feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private prope ' within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary: Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at leas. two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 4c feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Furthe information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPA& S MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effe,t. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parkin• lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorati - walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and a• esses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.705) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON-Residential Aepllcation/Planning Minion Section • SIGNS SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tiga d. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or heigh beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a develo ent review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review b fore the Hearings Officer. (Re r to Code Chapter 18.7801 SENSITIVE LANDS The Code prov es REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMEN DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAY ' WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas. and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application.`. Chapter 18.84 also provid:s regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEV: OPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. (Refer to Code Chapter 1; 5) STEEP SLOPES When STEEP SLOPES exist, p 'or to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the as 'royal standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report all be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY(USA)BUFFER STANDAR;S,R&0 96-44 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO •ENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enou h to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR SHALL BE A ' INIMUM OF 25-FEET-WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive a -a, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion • the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the ve•-tated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated co ridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corrido within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the averag: width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gar ens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities sh- I be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated co idor, except as allowed below: ➢ A GRAVEL WALKWAY OR BIKE PATH, NOT EXCEEDIN t EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor st be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be co tructed closer than ten (10) feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by th- Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to - isting vegetation; and > WATER QUALITY FACILITIES may encroach into the vegetated c• ridor a maximum of ten (10) feet with the approval of the Agency or City. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE P 'CE LS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor s all be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. (Refer to R&0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SWM) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NONResldentlal Application/Planning Division Section • WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT The W A TER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard . Compr: ,ensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of signi t wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishin clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit developme in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capa•'ty; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildli habitats; and conserve scenic,. recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLA P(STRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Re •urces) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). Th:se provisions require that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped .. "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual fl. less than 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs). ➢ Major streams in Tigard ' dude FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIB ' ARY CREEKS) AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEAR G STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard includ: Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tribu :ries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTAL►Y FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR TH: EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). ➢ The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPA A N SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBA' K IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STRE•MS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quali buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administere,, by the City of Tigard. (Refer to Code Section 18.797.030] Riparian Setback Reductions The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUC •N OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH • S 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this ch. eter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured throu• streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the ripan-n setback area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the appl -nt must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regu tion was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetation Study required by -ction 18.85.050.C. that demonstrates all of the following: ➢ Native plant species currently cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; ➢ The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; ➢ That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.85.050 regulating removal of native plant species; CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 NON-8esidamlal Application/Planning Melon Section • • ➢ That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and ➢ The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. (Refer to Code Section 18.797.1001 TREE REMOVAL 'LAN REQUIREMENTS A TRE' PAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified . borist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a developm- t application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned developme or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE P► • N SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identifi .tion of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as signifi•-nt by the City; ➢ ldentificatio I of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in • caliper. Miti•.tion must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: • • b Retaina•- of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation •rogram according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; b Retainage •f from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of he trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; a Retainage of om 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the tree , to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75'0 or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees w 'ch are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defini • standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after onstruction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE P. RIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will se inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.064.D. [Refer to Code Section 18.190.030.CJ MITIGATION REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take pla - according to the following guidelines: • A replacement tree shall be a substanti. ly similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species o the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replace ,ent with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not re:sonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: b The number of replacement trees requi ed shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree remove• or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement tr:-s. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the o irector may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other prope within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private prope ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in . manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this s.ction, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its co s in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.190.0601] CITY OF TIMID Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Olvlslon Section • • NARRATIVE The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.32] CODE CHAPTERS 18.330 /8.390 ✓ 18.520 _ 18.715 _ 18.765 18.795 18.350 "18.420 _ 18.530 _ 18.730 _ 18.775 _ 18.797 18.360 _ 18.430 _ 18.620 18.745 _ 18.780 _ 18.800 _ 18.370 18.510 _ 18.705 _ 18.755 _ 18.790 IMPA STUDY • - • . part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMP• . STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the developm- on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation s - , including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system an. - - noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall p •:•se improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development o me public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the .f• munity Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either :- ifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion th. •- real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the develop - cat. (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050] NEIGHB I OOD MEETING T APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE AP 'OPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUB s MMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the me- ing date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting a • the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application ill not be accepted. (Refer t the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RE NATION PRIOR TO SUBMI • ING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, applicant's are require• to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Offi.- in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not be cepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of e Subdivision Name Reservation. (County Surveyor's Office: 03-648-8884] BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OT R RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPRSVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be gr. ted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-ap,lication notes do not include comments from the Building. Division. For proposed buil•• gs or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Di ion Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the tructure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and • or Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (S►C) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is reco •ed, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued • the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN HICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). • CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Pagel of 9 NON4esldonUal Application/Planning Division Section • • RECYCLING- Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: N LICtiV ce I Dew t C z{ -r --tezetN ccE bc.SiC ( Srf4. :4 v i i tL -A. -+c SreS. k Cats c. g' NI S PA-1 A-Tidy / C c--sv5 5 evUNE' GL.-k-; - Q(•..L/S. PROCEDURE / Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. . APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard EehAlllcjS � • . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-De$Ideatlal Application/Planning DMston Section ! • This -PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE " ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code • requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED. AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: 1444k A*C4S CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP.MEETING PHONE: (5031639-4111 FAX (5031684-7291 E-MAIL (S.m, „e)@ci.tigard.or.us irdAst& • i:\curpin\masters\revised\preappc.mst (Engineering section:preapp.eng)\ Updated: Jun.7,99 CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NON4esldentlal Application/Planning OMsioe Section • PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES • ENGINEERING SECTION Q ty ° t Shaping A Better Community 15 l 2Asa pi) PUBLIC FACILITIES 4t "t\-too off ) The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: • The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk El street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. • CITY OF TIGARD Pre-ApplIcatIon Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department Section ( ) stre nprovements will be necessary al, to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete-curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: El feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: El feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2.) ( �f1 V. Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Apulcatlon Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section are on the opposite e of the street from the site. If the in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50•per lineal foo of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW . Prior to - , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. NIA oNcTkL, -«.s s, is Qc- 2 Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located Sw (9'1 • Pr - . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to Water Supply: The 4. - Phone:(503) 24S"-C75T'l provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the.City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. CSC C� t>.�T�.r- Taos 12. ,A2LD vkJ 1 svic. Is De.,6 . Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from CITY OF'BARD Pre-Applcatlon Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section newly created impervious faces. The resolution contains a pelsion that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of cons ructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ( Construction of an on-site water quality facility. CvA*.,..1 < -t c 4 ST7 ( ) Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. • TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. PERMITS -- Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section • In addition, the perleee will be required to post a boner similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section ' GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FiUBDIVISIONS AU subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer • will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: 62(251 I «'t ENGINEERING DEP TMENT STAFF Phone: (5031639-4171 Fat (5031684-7297 h:\patty\masters\preapp.eng (Master section:preapp-r.mst) 04-March-1999 CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Applicatlon Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section • • CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefull in con'unction- with the notes •rovided to ou at the •re- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: W` Z�Date: 6 (c)tci • 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: a' Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed envelopes and a notarized list of all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be legal-size, addressed with 1",x 4"labels Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION'(Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): Vicinity Map ❑ Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan C� Existing Conditions Map . ❑ Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan t ' Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan ❑ Site Development Plan ❑ Architectural Drawings ❑ Landscape Plan ❑ Sign Drawings ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES /Z COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 • • 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ • Traffic Study ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis ❑ Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200')and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 8% x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map L� C3' Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access I ❑ Existing Conditions Map Parcel boundaries,dimensions and gross area El • Contour lines(2'intervals for 0-10%slopes or 5'for slopes>10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: •_ Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% El • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ Locations of resource areas including: • •Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan El • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with>_6"caliper measured 4'from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses El Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 .. • Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ . Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner,developer,engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2'intervals for 0-10%grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location,type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to • the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks,open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures , are to remain after platting - ❑ . Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features including rock outcroppings,wetlands and marsh areas The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ Contour lines(2' intervals for slopes 0-10% or.5'for slopes>10%) ❑ Location,width and names of streets,easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25'of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4'above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections. ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 • Site Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations,dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site — ❑ • Parking and circulation areas • ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ . • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations,dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25'of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ . The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ Landscape Plan Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location,size and species of existing plant materials_ ❑ General location,size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 • • Grading/Erosion Control Plan The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines - ❑ Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system,showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location,width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location,size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ • i:\;curpin\masters\revised\chklist.doc 26-Nov-98 • City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 • • _.O • • r c e On ' , Department of Transportation " • "" '' • Region 1 Right of Way 123 NW Flanders • John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.,Governor Portland,OR 97209 Phone: 731-8400 FAX: 731-8458 FILE CODE: June 14, 1999 • Mark Roberts File R19575 City of Tigard Planning Division N.Tigard Intch.-- S.Tigard Intch. 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97223 Washington County Dear Mr. Roberts, The Oregon Department of Transportation is preparing to sell a portion of the excess right of way that has been purchased for the Haines Road Interchange during the last 40 years or so. Not too long ago, we participated in a lot line adjustment(MIS 99-0008)with Anne Leiser to square-up our common boundary line. -' I would like to petition for a pre-application conference to discuss the proposed Land Partition'as shown on the attached sketch map. I will be contracting with a surveyor who Will-assisfin defining the boundaries of this single parcel. The surveyor will also assist us in the Land Partition process. My rough calculations indicate that the area to be delineated and sold will contain about 40,500 SF. ODOT engineers have told us how much of this parcel should be retained for future highway widening so the ultimate size and shape will be exclusive of this requirement. Thank you very much for your help. You can call me directly at 731-8444. Very truly yours / sl Carl Toland Right of Way Agent • Form 734-1866(10/97) 0 ' 4.lij i 4: Lli-i<4 < ID =1 4 ....... • ,:- : • < • 0 C41). • LI : • < LI • VI „ : Li • 0 ill 0.4„ ., It_ 4 Z •----4>Li :< 0 -• :< - Li . 1 • . .• i to .4. cr..• . . Lt. .••• („t) 0 -• - •CZ 140 4 • . 4 ce to! ....r. 1.--I • D r- .... .......J._ 4 . : 4:1): i 0 tit:: .....-----. : :•.--, •.7. ..,•: ,::::-• I -, :::•./.1 , . „. , _______________________. .,.....„-„••••- •:„.... 1 / -------,„_......... . „. ••-•••• ••••••••••••••••• ,... ••,...., •-...• .•,...,:••,..,•--,..-•-#..•N.•,:i.-..,‘4„ .:•.„•,.....‘,.. *.e... t.""N'Z'N...."‘,....-‘...•‘',::,'N',:".‘,„"""%;_..... ",„„..-N;75,:: ••%„. 'a%NT 6.4••11%.••....••••64■44‘.•••‘;•••"6.•••1.„„N,-‘,„:N.''‘...-1. '‘..„:s.,'N"'":4,..,:,,,,,,,kk.,-N,,,,,N....Ns*.''‘..'v..N."Ii.,,-N,,..‘,•••‘,""'"‘ ..%; N..""‘:-.%•:".‘„"%.,.N,z-4.,:,A.:A--.%.,."*.,N.1-4,,k-N..‘4,,. .4,,,..•%.,•,•••ki.•••‘•••••••X••N••*C-•••X•••X„,''%,.....%::•‘,•,-N.,t..A„..--‘,,---‘,"-%:(N., ,....Nz-N....N.;,..,,q,•‘„,N.,%,„ N.:3%.33,3%. 343" N. 1 •61%. L '....‘, ..'•••••• 1 !...; t, .• .‘4...) 1 .• (■•••) ..' (.... ' Ct. ...... f...., .• P.... , (1. NT . ... ••• i .1,„. 6 6••• TT: Tt, NT, .e. ., e et" tr 46) '.. .1.33::ii,3 33 33i"I 33 33133 3.3, .e.e. e, 4.4. ei i t etee .... e. e :re;le le•:e e.).;) 1 .......e. .....oi le•-• ...... t e .1 -......... .4‘.1.) - ..........1 •ele ** i i e e f .• • i • 0., .."...“.iii ...,... •-••••. ....; .. .• . .• ? , • .• W LE,o•W'F.-‘'....Ei 1. e I:(:;• I 6. •6&•6•146.1.66. ••1 .... . ....... .......,...„. k .?••,1 ci I„;,...tk....Pi:,A 4 3:3,..1,:::: _,-...,,... 0 i••• .-..,,.. ,:•••3•,;', i•.,,,....:•,:::+f,,,..z.. i ...,..:,I :•:„:;:•:::: : „•••:, ,c,:,-, •••• ' - ' -4: it.- -..-::••,,. : . : , ,..,:: ,..:.:- •: ,,::::•0:, .:.•„,, ,...‘„::::.: . :•.•,::, •,,,,. .••,:::, , :,::::::,•• .- . . •• , • - ! •••:: • •-••!------...„ •••Q I 146 %.6 1_,,,,,,,,,,,, i 6, 46% • I• 666 N..-- • 6....„,,,,, ... ....... _ ....... ., ..... . . . 661 6 6 .• i • .• -- 6 i i T TN TN .... k.km ! -• i• ,• 11.1 .•.f.„, ,,,,i ,„0 i ,,,,• • I NI .. N. 46, Tr I- ■ e t„,j j 1 TN 6... 16., (6„ 64 TN TT. 1 - 61 .6 N..% 4,16 666 16% 661 --- .*::".., C.•:".? 0".:, ;••••ee ...e -, e. at) - I Lij 1,•.•:•,.., , . , ••.e. :e: ! r°i . •• :••., re; De.) .1-k.:, 33% 333.1 (3,3 333333- 3 333 t 3•••• 3.. 33. 3.3 33 333"• : f LL1 1 3•333' '33 33.3" ...... ■:3, I :: o° r.,,....: 1 ••••3 •• • ""3 Cr 3... 33.3 34 r •••••4 :••••• t i . . • , , rr N. ‘N 33 . .••• 33 • •• {'T 61•••• 6. , . , . : ••••i "4::: 4, •••• *.'"II-1 .4: .••• ....... :::: .• '. ' I" :I:I I I- I 1..4.1. .4..„4.....41.4'1 Nq,,, 7.` 66 : tr.66 `46.1 6.1.4" 166,1 .• 1 0.1•66IIII. i I ---). 4 4 i•-• I - 4 •..:•• -i . 1: • i I • . . cs.i , 9-4...:,..c: ' o' , ...... / • -•••••-'...-IIII to ••... . .• : i 1.I i 1:::: i cs.1 .....i Cf"). .1••:, I ... „.... I .•l'illir In 'IJI c):4. I) .••• , .;•::\ •, NI .1, --,- .....---. . 0 1 -. ,,„.".. ,„ •••• 1 >6.61 IIi 66 I -- -- T. WI 6" ..„•T I 464 6N, 373 i ..... , 33 , 33:: : .•• 33: ` ' 3-3 :<333 333-# 333 333.3 I .6 • I-- 416.6%. 67. TN% 6, Li.., 66, 1 1 1,` ' I , L.- N •TT 6 16661 .1 N T 6, , , ' T•• ••••J '66; 6.5 - i 6 16%1 N. •••• •• • 1 LT 66 4,6 TN ■ • •:%. T: . . .. . , t6 • 1 1 i ■ .1. 1 N..4 ... „ ,.. T , . ••• T 66: r 6%66 ad: , i ::::::,. '...)) i•• ....4 e i 33 3 . c3.1 ;33 33„1 I i , , 3 i 33 3 1 3333 I 3-3 333:333 33... I 33 3-3 ‘.6 --6 N. • e t• •••• .,,,• i ,•-•• =,,,, e:: ; • : :. • ,i• ••••••, ,-, 1 i to I `<4.- 1.-- k*,;;-;"st 1*7 >,..,. : •••.:•_:.; „•,,,' I ••, i•• re) t -••i \-1- • ,,,I. , .., , • fo ef, •-•-f:".,!,• • '44/ i:. -1 ,... ' i ■ (NI .., (. 1 i ...I . . .6 .V 1.46,::66 6.••••••6. •,61 • ..' 6 6 ••6 1 6 • -„ „ 1 16,1•I 16% .••• • ...„6,1 .A. t;1'4. • . ...1t. :'"..;:t; ::::.!....."..........;:t!. 1.......;:- ; :::-..................?...'L.: ':.......I'-.1... .. : ' ' I:- . .....j.- ••'^, 1 .....>.,.......i. i ,,,,.. - ,-I • ,..,. . . e • 're e. .• : te • M , \ „E„ :,,.....:;7. ;.•••,...... ....... e ... i , - ... „ ... „..„ 4. • •• i '•`' I •V : '••••,.• ...,•••.1i :•;;•:',' ,.;•:',. ,.,:: ' ,:;k.i ,.,',,...'. ' +co::: 1 ..;•::•' ••••••••••• •''•••,•,•7;.•;•••••••••••••••••••••••••••;,1 , • ____ . •• . ..__ .••••••, ... • # 1 .' • i.i..) NT I .4 6 • 1 L ..,..1% ' 6,,• • ... .616 I .i • • 6:•:': .,:;,..7., ..,',..f. • f••• ?• 1 ,,,,,, • , ,•+.1: ••-••••,' • • : l• I,..,, , C.1,-.) i• i,,, I : :....• ,,,,:,...• : .....,:e , ...,,,,•?, '• ,i,i,..1 k, ' • • 1 \1 • y• • , •r4 • . . : ,, .:••„1 0:-.). \ ,c.k. •• ,f.'„,.7M!,(-D ".,,' 1 ,- "•••■•- • ...r, rr''', .• • . i i .• : . ...... 0....t N .1-6 ,,,,.• •••' -4••• 1 • I 1 • '• I•:'%.: 6•• .46 111.6, 6 66 6 11%.„; i 6:61 -74. -... ..... 1I11:II6' ...,1 • i . t,„ 1N 1 % ,. 4, .... „ .•••• 1:66 6 6 1 . I • •• i ,e •• i ,.., , ,...: I ,..j.. , ••: --. re i. ..:..; -4: ..... •." Lki •" 4-.) UN. 666' 6666 6 66 ,.• .61 1:64 NT """ ri ...,• I T`T 1 . 6 6 66 1 TIII, 16. 1 166•6".6 6 • 66 C.I., . TN .... ••••1•1 1 I 1 i •- ' • - .‘,.. I --- !.. i•D .. •,...■., 'Cr •, ,T: i (.:) .•.... • . • . . 1 TN 6,;„..4.. 1.,,,, . i („„, „Li 6 16- 6; LLi 1..... ....., -- ..., .. • '' 1 .... 04 :•••••6 61 ...., 1.6 a,•I 1.•• I r,..• .''. .i. . rf) •`.. 1 ,,,-,••"!,..c.., ,.•; cr. 1....... ;._:::..`'. ire) ) ,..). \ ..... ,,-.......?.-1.•• . ; ,.. ' .•'•.', el', ......::',...7.••:••• -- +- - •H.- - 4- -.4 •-•• Oj 1 i i • •.•• T. 1 N , T 6 ..0 6 • I.•• ••••....1.....: • 6,1 i 6: •'6 ....• f'<;);414-::::•:44. ::44 0 : • 4,4 / n :0 • 4-4,1 • • • : 4 -t •4 • 4 ' 1••••••< 1 .._ • • 4: ,.. ,.. •• I:If: 1'0',,....,c: CX) • , .,... , T • ,- . ....... r., .• ,.....! • • ' '-' (.1) ..':... ..,, i : ,....: . • ..... ... _.. : 't'•:• g• ..,*• • 66 N .••• 41 , 6 I'. 16.„66 . ...„ 6, .6 • .••• .• .T 6 .. %. •1$6 . 6 .., ...• i .. . : TT•• .. I•616: : 66 : 6,6•6 . , 1 6„: % 61.6 6.•, 1 •^ .6 - .61 666 TN. •' 6 • • '6 I T• 6 6 N L. %, 6,6 6.6" '6`. 6% .• . • ••'• -, • • ' •- ••••••• ..... • . IN 1 1. r•r.:I:' ,-,,,•' 4•• :*.66 6.6 66 •• 146, 1:6, ... 61 .• I al' (46i 1••• IN : .6 . ' . .1 . : : ••• 646.... .'l• 1'0 • ,•.:., •,., ' r,,•••• •-•,,, ••, 'I, . ... • . • • • : .• . . . . •• • • . • k '•-`3••• •••••1„ ,„,:, ...... •_________ ..._...________________. ............................. • ____ . • l',..,,:, „,.,„, ,::: ...•°:,:-••1••...;:.. „„, ,,,,,,v..t-1,t,-::' : -. „.................. ____ ...... . ..,. .... v 1.---- •...,. •••9 11 N.'3 : • .. , .7-2. •. ..,... ,........_ . .. , • ........ ....: ••_ ,4: .•• .44>r.....- I t' :•• : • :4It I j • •••••••• ••••)))).4; 4") t. 4-, .••• I, : • : • .„ - ..-: . ••• :4.44 ..1.- :•• I : , • .•••: I • • •,/ 1.---.. 1 • : : ...,..: ..,, ..•, • . ... ., •.. . . . , • •• .. e ,•••,, : . . .. . ..•• . . •••• : , 1.1J- I • .•• ,•••••••••-, •• • • • • ... ...,. :., r..... • ..: • • • ••• •••ei : ...,. .. • . . ,.....-•:. .. ••••••• -.....r . • •• •4 .