Loading...
ZOA1999-00002 ZOA I 999 - oocoz milk W 0 A CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community — �;: ";�t.k, .f? y .r �id' a>�,s;�,.^.. �'-:,::--:,;:„;: :;„1.::::7 LAND USEyPROP�O.SAI SC 0 . � 120 DAYS = N/A FILE NO(S).: ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT IZOAI 1999-00002 FILE TITLE: CLARIFYING AMENDMENTS RELATING TO FINAL DECISIONS, EFFECTIVE DATES, APPEAL REQUIREMENTS, DEVELOPMENT CONFORMANCE, STANDARDS APPLICABILITY, AND DEDICATION AND IMPROVEMENTS REQUIREMENTS. APPLICANT(S): City of Tigard OWNER(S): Same . 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 REQUEST: The City of Tigard proposes clarification amendments to the Tigard Community Development Code language in Sections 18.340.020.G., 18.390.040.F., 18.390.040.G.2.c., 18.390.040.H., 18.390.050.G., 18.390.080.A.1.d., 18.620.010.B., 18.810.020.A., 18.810.020.E., 18.810.030.A., 18.810.070.A., 18.810.080.A. and 18.810.110.A. & B. to better define Final Decisions, Effective Dates, Appeal Requirements, Development Conformance, Standards Applicability, and Dedication and Improvements Requirements. LOCATION: Citywide ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2 and 11; Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1.a., 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 7 and 8; and Community Development Code Sections 18380.020 and 18.390.060.G: CIT AREA: West, South, East, Central CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: COMMENTS SENT: DUE: ❑ STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: ❑ HEARINGS OFFICER [MONJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME:1:00 PM © PLANNING COMMISSION [MONJ DATE OF HEARING: IULY19,1999 TIME:1:30PM © CITY COUNCIL (TUESJ DATE OF HEARING: AUGUST10,1999 TIME:7:30PM COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION ❑ VICINITY MAP © PROPOSED REVISIONS © STAFF REPORT ❑ SITE PLAN ❑ ARCHITECTURAL PLAN ❑ TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ❑ ARBORIST REPORT ❑ OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Richard Bewersdorff, Planning Manager (503) 639-4171 Ext. 316 ZOA 1999-00002 LAND USE PROPOSAL • • JUN N 09 1999 RAMIS CREW CORRIGAN & BACHRACH, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1727 N.W.Hoyt Street MEMORANDUM Portland,Oregon 97209 (503)222-4402 Fax: (503)243-2944 TO: Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director FROM: Timothy V. Ramis, James M. Coleman& Gary Firestone, City Attorney's Office DATE: June 8, 1999 RE: Tigard Community Development Code Revisions Attached are draft revisions to the Community Development Code, as we have discussed, in both plain text and redline/strikeout versions. In addition to changes to provisions relating to public improvements, we are including some changes relating to procedure, including clarification of effective dates. As to the Type II procedure, these revisions make it clear that the final local appeal is to the Hearings Officer. We have reviewed the Code and conclude that, despite some ambiguity, the Type II procedure as written, concludes with the Hearings Officer decision. The amendments are intended to clarify existing provisions and to make minor amendments to provide greater assurance of compliance with Dolan. Because those changes delete absolute requirements to dedicate and improve streets, we have added a provision that defines"streets" as "public streets" for most purposes of Chapter 18.810. Please call with any question or comments you may have. Enclosures } cc: William A. Monahan, City Manager g@\acm\90024\codeamend.mel fiQ • • TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS SECTION 1: Subsection 18.340.020.G. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: G. Final decision/effective date. The decision of the City Council on an appeal of a Director Interpretation shall be final and effective when notice of the decision is mailed to the applicant, provided however, that if the applicant is the Director or the City Council, the decision is final and effective when made. SECTION 2: Subsection 18.390.040.F. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: F. Final decision and effective date. A Type II Administrative Decision is final for purposes of appeal when notice of the decision is mailed. A Type II Administrative Decision becomes effective on the day after the appeal period expires, unless an appeal is filed. If an appeal is filed and dismissed after the appeal period has expired, the Type II Administrative Decision becomes effective on dismissal of the appeal. SECTION 3: Subsection 18.390.040.G.2.c. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: c. Appeal procedures. Type III notice and hearing procedures shall be used for all Type II Administrative Appeals, as provided in Sections 18.390.050 C -F. SECTION 4: Subsection 18.390.040.H. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: H. Final decision and effective date. The decision of the Hearings Officer on appeal of a Type II decision is the final decision of the City and is final and effective on the day notice of the decision is mailed. SECTION 5: Subsection 18.390.050.G. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: G. Final decision 1. Final decision, effective date and appeal. The decision of the Planning Commission or Hearings Officer in a Type III action is Page 1 • • final for purposes of appeal on the date notice of the decision is mailed. Any party with standing may appeal a Type III decision to the City Council by filing a Notice of Appeal with the Director within 10 business days of the date notice of the decision is mailed. The Notice of Appeal shall be in the form specified in Section 18.390.040G.2(a)(2). The procedures of Sections 18.390.050 C-F shall be followed in the appeal. 2. Final Decision on Appeal. The decision of the City Council on any Type III appeal is the final decision of the City and is final and effective on the date notice of the decision is mailed. SECTION 6: Subsection 18.390.080.A.1.d. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: d. "Effective date" means the date on which a particular action or decision may be undertaken or otherwise implemented. For decisions which are subject to review or appeal by any city council, board, or officer, the effective date will normally be the day after the appeal period expires. If an appeal is dismissed after the appeal period has expired, the decision that was the subject of the appeal becomes effective at the moment of dismissal. Final decisions of the City(those that are not subject to any further appeal or review within the City) are normally effective when they become final. SECTION 7: Subsection 18.620.010.B. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: B. Development conformance. All new development, including remodeling and renovation projects resulting in uses other than single family residential use, are expected to contribute to the character and quality of the area. In addition to meeting the design standards described in this chapter and other development standards required by the Community Development and Building Codes, such developments will be required to: 1. Dedicate and improve public streets, to the extent that such dedication and improvement is directly related and roughly proportional to an impact of the development; 2. Connect to public facilities such as sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage; Page 2 • • 3. Participate in funding future transportation and other public improvement projects in the Tigard Triangle, provided that the requirement to participate is directly related and roughly proportional to an impact of the development. SECTION 8: Subsection 18.810.020.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: A. When standards apply. Unless otherwise provided, construction, reconstruction or repair of streets, sidewalks, curbs, and other public improvements shall occur in accordance with the standards of this title. No development may occur and no land use application may be approved unless the public facilities related to development comply with the public facility requirements established in this section and adequate public facilities are available. Applicants may be required to dedicate land and build required public improvements only when the required exaction is directly related to and roughly proportional to the impact of the development. SECTION 9: Subsection 18.810.030.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: A. Improvements. 1. No development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street. 2. No development shall occur unless streets within the development meet the standards of this chapter. 3. No development shall occur unless the streets adjacent to the development meet the standards of this chapter, provided, however, that a development may be approved if the adjacent street does not meet the standard but half-street improvements meeting the standards of this title are constructed adjacent to the development. 4. Any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall meet the standards of this chapter. 5. If the City could and would otherwise require the applicant to provide street improvements, the City Engineer may accept a future improvements guarantee in lieu of street improvements if one or more of the following conditions exist: Page 3 • • a. A partial improvement is not feasible due to the inability to achieve property design standards; b. A partial improvement may create a potential safety hazard to motorists or pedestrians; c. Due to the nature of existing development on adjacent properties it is unlikely that street improvements would be extended in the foreseeable future and the improvement associated with the project under review does not, by itself, provide a significant improvement to street safety or capacity; d. The improvement would be in conflict with an adopted capital improvement plan; e. The improvement is associated with an approved land partition on property zoned residential and the proposed land partition does not create any new streets; or f. Additional planning work is required to define the appropriate design standards for the street and the application is for a project which would contribute only a minor portion of the anticipated future traffic on the street. 6. The standards of this chapter include the standard specifications adopted by the City Engineer pursuant to Section 18.810.020.B. 7. The approval authority may approve adjustments to the standards of this chapter if compliance with the standards would result in an adverse impact on natural features such as wetlands, steep slopes, or existing mature trees. The approval authority may also approve adjustments to the standards of this chapter if compliance with the • standards would have an substantial adverse impact on existing development or would preclude development on the property where the development is proposed. In approving an adjustment to the standards, the approval authority shall balance the benefit of the adjustment with the impact on the public interest represented by the standards. In evaluating the impact on the public interest, the approval authority shall consider the criteria listed in Section 18.810.030.E.1 An adjustment to the standards may not be granted if the adjustment would risk public safety. Page 4 • • SECTION 10: Subsection 18.810.070.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: A. Sidewalks. All industrial streets shall have sidewalks meeting City standards along one side of the street. All other streets shall have sidewalks meeting City standards along both sides of the street. A development may be approved if an adjoining street has sidewalks on the side adjoining the development, even if no sidewalk exists on the other side of the street. SECTION 11: Subsection 18.810.080.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: A. Dedication Requirements. 1. Where a proposed park, playground or other public use shown in a development plan adopted by the City is located in whole or in part in a subdivision,the Commission may require the dedication or reservation of such area within the subdivision, provided that the reservation or dedication is roughly proportional to the impact of the subdivision on the park system. 2. Where considered desirable by the Commission in accordance with adopted comprehensive plan policies, and where a development plan of the City does not indicate proposed public use areas, the Commission may require the dedication or reservation of areas within the subdivision or sites of a character, extent and location suitable for the development of parks or other public use, provided that the • reservation or dedication is roughly proportional to the impact of the subdivision on the park system. SECTION 12: Subsections 18.810.110.A. and B. of the Tigard Community Development Code are amended to read as follows: A. Bikeway extension. Developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through dedication of easements or rights-of-way, provided such dedication is directly related to and roughly proportional to the impact of the development. Page 5 • • • B. Cost of construction. Development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvement in an amount roughly proportional to the impact of the development. SECTION 13: The Tigard Community Development Code is amended by adding a new section 18.810.020.E. to read as follows: E. Except as provided in Section 18.810.030.5, as used in this chapter, the term"streets" shall mean"public streets" unless an adjustment under Section 18.810.020.D is allowed. gfflacm\90024\codeamend.or1(6/4/99) Page 6 • • TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE PROPOSED REVISIONS REDLINE/STRIKEOUT VERSION SECTION 1: Subsection 18.340.020.G. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: G. Final decision/effective date, The decision of the City Council on ............................... an appeal of a Director Interpretation shall be final and ff ct iv • when>:'�«::.:::::::::::::<:>' >: :: ::>:�:::::>:::< . ........... notice.:o1"the decision it-is mailed to the applicant, pravi; :' ''..:.::::�::: ° cif tl a de son f na and f e ti hen m 'e>The decision :b • • . . . .• ., I '. . • • . 1 • . •• • I ' jurisdiction. SECTION 2: Subsection 18.390.040.F. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: F. Final decision and effective date. A Type II Administrative Decision is final for purposes of appeal when tieca'ai it-is mailed. A Type II Administrative Decision becomes rs-effective on the day after the appeal period expires, l s a a`': `ea< If an a cal is filed the • . 11 • . and> ig*—s c >a g > 13e • ::i::::i:::i::t:i:i:::_ :!.}}ii:.:.iii:.Jii!.i:<1<•.iJiii.:.iii. v:.iii:Sh::::.::iii'r.i::.:iXi.:: ::.iii::::.: :v:::.::.+ ......:..... ...:. .:..:.'.: .:. .:..:..::'::::::::i.:::::: : :,:'.:i::..:::::."::i:'..::i :::'::.:::.:5 :::::. ...::..i..:..r:..::; . :::..:i+.::.Yii:<L.:<:i.::.: appeal.; ,eriod:;has::ex :ired> tlhe:::T;pe;II> dm :n strativ.:e::D:ecisio p:qg rnes �` l?` �P ...........................:.:.::: ::: ::::.�:::::::.::::.::::::::::::::::. SECTION 3: Subsection 18.390.040.G.2.c. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: c. Appeal procedures. Type III notice and hearing procedures shall be used for all Type II Administrative Appeals, as provided in Sections 18.390.050 C -G1. SECTION 4: Subsection 18.390.040.H. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: H. Final decision and effective date. The decision of the Hearings Officer with appeal of a Type II ' decision is the final decision of the City and as gnat and a ective an the day not ce of tom dec s o `is z mailed >'> • • • . ' • 0 •' • • .. .• • . . . • . . . . • • • - .• I. • • Page 1 • ••' . . . ..' - • . . • IF '.. .• , . I . . . . . • • • • . . . appealisresolvech SECTION 5: Subsection 18.390.050.G. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: G. Final decision 7': Final decision, effective date and appeal. The decision of the .... ::::i::i::i::i:::i::::,:::i' i::i::::•:„:•:::i::I::i::i::f::i:i::::i:::"....:...".. ..f.::i:<:::i::i:::::::: • lar g omimsst n; r : gs c 4:::::•::;:::::::::,.._ ype III appeal-a n is final for purposes of appeal on the date::::::<::;::><:> :,:°, . .,„,.:: mil notice..ofthe..deczsfor�rt-is a ed. Air::::; 'a ifi hand :; !:i::::iYi::ii::i::i:::i:i;::ii::i:::::'i:::ii1;::':ii:i::i:::Y:';:i::i::i i:i:::i s ti: :ii:!i •'<':is i iC:i:::: m .. a eal TY:M14t deei:sion to the>Cit:eCbt n:cr >by til a :ite:<! ;»::>:i; i ., t ix::F.„::: .::Director::: '.t:::>:itt:;::::9::b i d avk: : t ..... ............... ............:...................:::............................................................:.:........................:.......................... ::.-f..-.:: ::i:;.: : iii:;::: ?::1i::iiiiiii§;::. Y..i:.::.::.ii: .'i::::: :.ii:.4:..:iiiiii:•: :i':::::::4::::::.:n i::l :::.i:.i: date:>niotice;af:the:decr r r::: s:ma�i:led2:::<The::N gtr e of:A p.�eat::: h 1::b ix.th. ..f.rm:�`' cfirl �< cfo >�8< `.`0� <� a` `�' ir ::: : :::::: pre:n±edur.s of S...et}Q�ns IS.39t 050.;C;.: 'shall:be• fbl kwed in the .............. e : .. . ' . • •. . • • . . - • . •.. .' . . . . . - .,•• . . . • - . . . . .. •iiii::::: a eetst� t� ppeal a�tec�sia: �iih�� t�you � 3� f,::::>::::i>:... <::.i::>:.::.::'.:::>::i::: :.i:.i:., >:;;::::::.:::::g::.::::,:.i:.i::i::::>:; i: i::::::ii :Y:.i:.::.:;:::::.:i::;:,.::.:' :.i:.:;.i :.i ::i::: `. ;e:I :: e is tthe final decision of t te< ity ands:final and n e date notwea the decision rna� ec ....: SECTION 6: Subsection 18.390.080.A.1.d. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: d. "Effective date” means the date on which a particular action or decision may be undertaken or otherwise implemented. Cr .i:.::::::::::::it :;;i:;:;:i;:;i.:;:;:i.'::::i::iy`:;:;:i:222:;22:.*:;.;.,: „..:::::i::::i::......::::::::::::i::i:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::i:::i:`'''::::;::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::i::::i::::::5::5::::::i:::i':: d o sresn t!1 :c#i:a e su i >to>ro re v:or i b::.:an..::>c .:.>i onci: ioa i :::::::::;:::i:::: ::::>: :>:: >is:::::>:::is2:i:. ::::<i:::::i:::ii2:::i i:2: :::i:::i::::i:i: ...:I ::::::i:i''::::::::i::'::t::i::::: i::`::: .i., :.r.: :rsro oe:-,the a ectr date will nr nnally.t'ethe a'alien :::::iii:4ii li:i::i::iii:i: si.eg:C::::'::":i :'::iiiiiii:: i':ii::::iiiiii:::i:i:i::i::i ::iii''S:::::ivi:::....::.::i::i::k:i:i:i:ii:' e> : `eal€ .ericiile;t :res€>>ll : el>is€MisriiissefisrIea al :::::i ply ::::::.P.: :: . .L :.: :::::. ::::::::::PP.:!...:::i.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::h:0 6? 4) i:::::::i::::ii::::::i::::::i::i:.';:i:22ii"::>::ii:t::�:::22:is2:i?` i:i::2:i:22:;:;2:;2;i'::i::i::2:;:{i'::2i2:::i::i::i:i2:::'.::`:�':t:;:;tt :t;:i;i;:;:i;;:'. e`v`::::::zt:::: . . 'it' '2:.. ] 1 ' ::: t:w li -::: `: h " .1 • t'?! :. .!� �:.ex�.:;!e� �h�;��c,s,�an�1#a..;: .;�5; .::;� �?j�.4`�:�;: �.i::�<'��!1��i�.: 'eco es.e#f t r... �t':::::.:::i:::i:: :::i>:.>><::;;.:,di:::::::i e.a ..h ..mo. ent.of'd s€nr��ai:< rta >�es�t� '• the< :,t ose nay° a::e:ii::ii::> su i:j:::xi: hat. r. .not.sub ect:aa:` ri 2 aut#)z::::> a_::- i'»> E::` >:,2, :<::<: ::,.i::::i::isi::.s:�::::::.:i.i:. ::.i... i:.::.i:.. i is::a::....:*:: '.:::.:.:;:.:.:::.:'.:.::.::..;.i.::..:.:;.i:. .i:.i:.:.f.„:.::.;:.::.:.i':'.::.i:.i':.i:.i within the.Cit:;>.ace nvii nal y elf'eetive:when the be me final<> .' . . . . . . • • . . . • • •. . . . , • • . . . , • • . • Page 2 • • SECTION 7: Subsection 18.620.O10.B. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: B. Development conformance. All new developments, including remodeling ....................................... ....................................... and renovation projects resulting in it ses ther tl an':nem-single family residential use, are expected to contribute to the character and quality of aria the area In addition to meeting the design standards described ai tl .................. ................... chi pter bekm-and other development standards required by the rut Development and Building Codes, such developments will be ........:...::..:...:.. required to: 1 Y Dedicate and improve public streets, tt to a tenu.to suc „e cation and improvement is directly;related and roughly p oportior to 3x1 impact ti the dovel4pnaer t., Connect to public facilities such as sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage; and 3. Participate in funding future transportation and other public improvement projects in within the Tigard Triangle, rvddtt rougy qtr .nal..to. n..zrt'aftnet 'rtenf SECTION 8: Subsection 18.810.020.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: A. When standards apply. Unless otherwise provided, construction, reconstruction or repair of streets, sidewalks, curbs, and other public improvements within the City shall occur in accordance with the standards of this title. No development may occur and....q. t use appheatro#1.maybe approved unless the public facilities related to development comply with the public facility requirements ........................................................................................................ established in this section i ,,:;:.,; :;:.>::.;:;.:;;.::.:::_< .>>::::::>:; ::::::>:��>;,.::::>:::;::::::::;::;�>::>::;:::;;::::::::::<: .. d adequate.publzc fae�l�ties.are avaitable. ppi cants may be required tc�dedicate 1 d end build required pub e improvements:>only< !:hen:t 0110 :red::: . tI tt s:dir:+eet1><::related:>to::: d ,...gh:y propor Tonal to the impact of the development.. SECTION 9: Subsection 18.810.030.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: A. Improvements. • 1. No development shall occur unless the development has frontage or Page 3 • • approved access to a public street. 2. <d 1 shat l s et tuft er .r n meetthe<std ;ds . hs:capter<: 3. o t3 N....d.....el went:AAlt:brtiriless:the:strdfig:::aid°itcdhttdt]`e 0e tip >: r g w 4:01a o tlu c. pt x:pv. qw r that:::::, >: ::::::>:,;.:; :: r ::;:; >: a:gkgd.�pmer i maybe approved.if the adjacent.atr d es npt meetthe. andar t t tus title a�`e c struct d adjaceenl > tote deye 6664iti 4. Any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall . . •• . . . • . . . • . . . : ••• this-code»>,:<:::::;>::;:,>:::::,::: :>::;:::::<:::><: :::::>::::::: ::,<>>;:>:<: :>,,:<:<:::>;;:.>:<>::>:<' tYl��:���.,Std�3d�1'��.:4���I�.:C�k�pt�f. • 5. Woo:: . uld and"oat�therw�se require the,appi�cant .......................................:......:...........::::...........: provide street Improvements,>the City Engineer may accept a future improvements guarantee in lieu of street improvements if one or more of the following conditions exist: a. A partial improvement is not feasible due to the inability to achieve property design standards; b. A partial improvement may create a potential safety hazard to motorists or pedestrians; c. Due to the nature of existing development on adjacent properties it is unlikely that street improvements would be extended in the foreseeable future and,the improvement associated with the project under review does not, by itself, provide a significant improvement to street safety or capacity; d. The improvement would be in conflict with an adopted capital improvement plan; e. The improvement is associated with an approved land partition on property zoned residential and the proposed land partition does not create any new streets; or f. Additional planning work is required to define the appropriate design standards for the street and the application is for a project which would contribute only a Page 4 • • minor portion of the anticipated future traffic on the street. 6. 'let dar ti s t a ter elud # standarc : : . t tt t ::i:i Y:::::: ::: :::i::::i:i::i':i:::::::. i::i::'::1:::::i::is:: ;i.::: :.::::::.:::i'..i.:: .::..:.::ii::: ::::::�:% :1�� �::�:::� ::::::�.;:::: ::!' ::: ' .. i:i.-..::: � .. .: .:::: :: ':i' '::::.:::i :'"�:i�<:i::::. a..:optg 004. ley; ngtn0er;p0rsu nt a.; ect n.:.;18atiM.::.::::::::: 7. . • • • • • • . .' . : . . . . • •• • I . . , . , d e l l • •. . 1 • • • I. I • . . • • • . .• - • • • . . • • . I The pprcya a t om ma:.�.<approve ad: st ends tc t e standards .................................................................................................................................................................. ::::.:4.i:.:i.i:.::.i:.i:.i:.i'.i:.i:.i:.:i: :.i:.i:.i:.i:.i:.i:.i:T:.iii:.i:.:{.:i.i:.i:.:i.i)::.:.i:.i'.::.i:.i:.i:.:.i'.i:.i:.i:.i:ii:4ii::.:i.ii:.i:•i:.i:.:.i:.:.:i S•i:•ii:.:ti:•i:�:::.i:1i:.:::i:.i:::i.: ofthss:>cha er<if':car.;:.. hance<' ith the;standards vc?o d r zlt in<an ..:......:..:..:1?t. ,n?1?....:.. dell. :.:.............. .::...::.....:.: ......... ad..exse.:tin'' cto € atral#"�a� r��`:� ca? tlan sty. s OJT> xi:stin n atu:re>trees><The a : .roval aut or :::€ma:':>aJso a. rove ;;:::d.:<: :.;. :;>is ,,>' 1e_>';::;:.::;::>:a't .:.. s end: milg:skid.;:.::.::: .;:.:;:: :.:;:p.::: .;::c ?v .: and r �s would'ha ee a su b.stantiaf::ad !verse:dime•act::on existin de elopme t€ r<`ould€pre lud d vel me t< tte<;°t err where ttc.d et > » "t"s »rt >.' tIn approving an € t exceptiorrto the standards, the approval authority shall determine ........................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... batancp the heftt the adjustment r?vith the unpact 4x1 .................................................................................................................... fi e p blic>ir i`est r es ted>by he standards. In evaluating the ......................................... .................. ..................................................................... public beacft� mpact' Y `''" t Q 1, the approval authority shall consider the criteria listed in Section 18.810.030.E.1 adjustment to th standards a`:' n t b ra ted if the adj st oat ............................................................. ............................................................ SECTION 10: Subsection 18.810.070.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: .................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................... .:'.:: :.ii:.i:.::'.i:.i:.:i:.l:i:::;:;�::':i::i:::::'.:.:.:.:::.::•:i'::.::i::::•i:.:::;:i:::.::f:i:i'i:�:::i{;.:; ::i•:::;•:;..i•:;.•.:.:.:: .::::��.i�i:.:i::: A. Sidewalks ludustnat:streetks<shall have>s de val eetin: ity .................................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................................. standards€aloe one::side::ref tt e>street><:Alt:::other::streets:shall::have :�;.::.:,,;,,,,ks,tne.,,.,tng; rty,standards along both.s�d�s afthe str .,. ...................::....:...:...........:.................::...........::.::.::.....:::..:............::::.::.:.......................::.::........................................ devek mend i' a:>:`boa proved>l :an d t im <street has<sidewalks en:the ,:;;:;;....... .. ......................... .......................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................... �iNi:'ii:.ii:i.i::�iiiA.ii:i:.i:.iiii:::::ii:i:.:.:':}:.:::.::::::::.::[.iY:i:•i%iii%:iiiiiiiii::�iii+i:f: iiiiiiiiii:ii:':.ii:Ciiiii:':!:.iiiiii:..i:.i'.iiiiiii:4:4:i:...iiiiiiiii'.:iiiiiiiii:S4.i'X: side ad o�nin the devel !. ment even;:if`n sidewalk exists=on the:Dater:side tthe Street'.r>: •. • . . . : . • . : • 2. On both sides of all other st,cets and in pcdest.pan casomcnts and Page 5 • • • • • . . . •. • • • . . • • • • • . . . '. . . .. . • . • 7 and • V • • • • • \ • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • - I • • • • • • • • • SECTION 11: Subsection 18.810.080.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: A. Dedication Requirements. 1. Where a proposed park, playground or other public use shown in a development plan adopted by the City is located in whole or in part in a subdivision, the Commission may require the dedication or reservation of such area within the subdivision, ovddta t>x pc . .........................................................................................................................:.:.::.....::............:..:............ reservat on or deds<at on is rou. hl ro i io to the i :act t f 2. Where considered desirable by the Commission in accordance with adopted comprehensive plan policies, and where a development plan of the City does not indicate proposed public use areas, the Commission may require the dedication or reservation of areas within the subdivision or sites of a character, extent and location suitable for the development of parks o` and-other public use, to<the im":'act o t e s l d€visits :on the:::.arty:, ;stert�:v SECTION 12: Subsections 18.810.110.A. and B. of the Tigard Community Development Code are amended to read as follows: A. Bikeway extension, Developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through dedication of easements or rights-of-way, provided de cation is:directly<related to:and::r :ughly ,rooio altos a B. Cost of construction. Development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvement an a. ount.roughly.p opflrtianal to the.impact of he developnxetit< Page 6 • SECTION 13: The Tigard Community Development Code is amended by adding a new subsection 18.810.020.E. to read as follows: • to Cirt::t'streets"ha1�:>m can ubZi ::streets": nl:ess:an:<ad usfim nt;:x nd+ r g j£ ZOD:i : 11>w.... ................................................................................... gft\acm\90024\codeamend.rd 1(6/4/99) Page 7 FORM, 2 • • DLCD NOTICE OF ADOPTION Co 0 y This form must be mailed to DLCD within 5 working days after the final decision per ORS 197.610 and OAR Chapter 660-Division 18 (See reverse side for submittal requirements) Jurisdiction: City of Tigard Local File No.: ZOA 1999-00002 (If no number,use none) Date of Adoption: 8/10/99 Date Mailed: August 13. 1999 (Must be filled in) (Date mailed or sent to DLCD) Date the Notice of Proposed Amendment was mailed to DLCD: June 24, 1999 Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment _ Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment — X Land Use Regulation Amendment _ Zoning Map Amendment New Land Use Regulation _ Other: (Please Specify Type of Action) Summarize the adopted amendment. Do not use technical terms. Do not write "See Attached." Clarification amendments to the Community Development Code(Title 18) language specifically in Sections 18.340.020.G.. 18.390.040.F.. 18.390.040.G.2.c.. 18.390.040.H.. 18.390.050.G., 18.390.080.A.1.d.. 18.620.010.B.. 18.810.020.A.. 18.810.020.E.. 18.810.030.A.. 18.810.070.A., 18.810.080.A. and 18.810.110.A. & B. to better define Final Decisions, Effective Dates. Appeal Requirements, Development Conformance, Standards Applicability, and Dedication and Improvements Requirements. Describe how the adopted amendment differs from the proposed amendment. If it is the same, write "Same." If you did not give notice for the proposed amendment, write "N/A." Same Plan Map Change from: N/A to N/A Zone Map Change from: N/A to N/A Location: Citywide Acres Involved: N/A Specify Density: Previous: N/A New: N/A Applicable Statewide Planning Goals: 1 & 11 Was an Exception adopted? Yes: _ No: X DLCD File No.: • • 1 1 Did the Department of Land Conservation and Development receive a Notice of Proposed . .Amendment FORTY FIVE (45) days prior to the first evidentiary hearing? Yes: _ No: X NOTE: ORIGINAL NOTICE SENT UNDER OLD REQUIREMENTSPRIORTO NEW.LAW If no, do the Statewide Planning Goals apply. Yes: X No: _ If no, did The Emergency Circumstances Require immediate adoption. Yes: _ No: X Affected State or Federal Agencies, Local Governments or Special Districts: L.C.D.C. and Metro Local Contact: Richard Bewersdorff. Planning Manager Area Code + Phone: (503) 639-4171 Address: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard City: Tigard. OR Zip Code + 4: 97223-8189 ADOPTION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS This form must be mailed to DLCD within 5 working days after the final decision per ORS 197.610 and OAR Chapter 660- Division 18 1. Send this Form and Two (2) Copies of the Adopted Amendment to: ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 635 CAPITAL STREET NE, SUITE 150 SALEM, OREGON 97301-2540 COPY TO: Metro Land Use & Planning ODOT— Region 1, District 2-A 600 NE Grand Avenue Jane Estes, Permit Specialist Portland, OR 97232-2736 5440 SW Westgate Drive, Suite 3 Portland, OR 97221-2414 2. Submit Two (2) copies of adopted material, if copies are bounded please submit two (2) complete copies of documents and maps. 3. Please Note: Adopted materials must be sent to DLCD not later than five (5) working days following the date of the final decision on the amendment. 4. Submittal of this Notice of Adoption must include the text of the amendment plus adopted findings and supplementary information. 5. The deadline to appeal will be extended if you do not submit this Notice of Adoption within five working days of the final decision. Appeals to LUBA may be filed within TWENTY-ONE (21) days of the date, the "Notice of Adoption" is sent to DLCD. 6. In addition to sending the "Notice of Adoption" to DLCD, you must notify persons who participated in the local hearing and requested notice of the final decision. 7. Need More Copies? You can copy this form to 8-1/2x11 green paper only ; or call the DLCD Office at (503) 373-0050; or Fax your request to: (503) 378-5518; or Email your request to Larry.French(a�state.or.us —ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST. • • CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON ORDINANCE NO.99- 2 Z A ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA 1999-00002) TO AMEND PROVISIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE BY ADOPTING CLARIFYING AMENDMENTS TO SECTIONS 18.340.020.G., 18.390.040.F., 18.390.040.G.2.c. 18.390.040.H., 18.390.050..G., 18.390.080.A.1.d., 18.620.010.B., 18.810.020.A., 18.810.020.E.,, 18.810.030.A., 18.810.070.A., 18.810.080.A. AND 18.810.110.A. & B. TO BETTER DEFINE FINAL DECISIONS, EFFECTIVE DATES, APPEAL REQUIREMENTS, DEVELOPMENT CONFORMANCE, STANDARDS APPLICABILITY, AND DEDICATION AND IMPROVEMENTS REQUIREMENTS. WHEREAS, the City of Tigard finds it necessary to revise the Community Development Code periodically to improve the operation and implementation of the Code; and WHEREAS, some of the wording in the Code could be termed ambiguous; and WHEREAS, the City of Tigard is continually evolving its response to the 1994 Supreme Court decision relating to dedication and"rough proportionality"; and WHEREAS, the City of Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 19, 1999 regarding the above listed amendments; and WHEREAS, the City of Tigard Planning Commission voted to recommend the revised Code sections shown in Exhibit"A"; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on August 10, 1999 to consider the amendments. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The proposed amendments are consistent with all relevant criteria based on the facts and conclusions noted in the attached staff report(Exhibit B). SECTION 2: The specific text amendments attached to this Ordinance are hereby adopted and approved by the City Council. SECTION 3: This Ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By U /1 a YYLO U.S vote of all Coun it members present after being read by number and title only,this /0 ` day of , 1999. Catherine atley, City 'ecorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this �- 1999. J•�� icoli, ayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: C tto ey ORDINANCE NO. 99-2,2.- Page 1 of 1 • • DRAFT' EXHIBIT A • TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE • . PROPOSED REVISIONS REDLINE/STRIKEOUT VERSION • SECTION 1: Subsection 18.340.020.G. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: G. Final decision/effective date. The decision of the City Council on an appeal of a Director Interpretation shall be final and effectie: • when`ist,:::<:::::::>::.> t::e;: >:;<>:_<::=«::i it-is mailed to the applicant, <:::>:'<::. >::::� nvt�.ce;�!�. �?:.;�eGzstc�n PP � provadec�, • • . . • . . ••r • ••• •• • • le r': •, • •• •• • ... I • • •• y• . • the Land Use Doard of Appeals or a cUUI t'of coalpeteid • SECTION 2: Subsection 18.390.040.F. of the Tigard Community Development Code is . amended to read as follows: F. Final decision and effective date. A Type H Administrative Decision is . final for purposes of appeal when t t e f t e tg.0 it-is mailed. A .::: > .. . ..:..:......:..:....:... Type II Administrative Decision becomes.ineffective on the day after the appeal period expires, unless an a peal is fl .. If an appeal is filed the PP P P , ...PP..::::.,.::.:::::.,:. PP ? sz �ss `aiEter appeal p• nod has xpire...,tk�eType I t�dtnxr strative ecision bec mes el ectr�re on zl,snnssal fthe p l SECTION 3: Subsection 18.390.040.G.2.c. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: c. Appeal procedures. Type III notice and hearing procedures shall be used for all Type II.Administrative Appeals, as provided in Sections 18.390.050 SECTION 4: Subsection 18.390.040.H. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: • H. Final decision and effective date. The decision of the Hearings Officer with ``n appeal of a Type II Administrative-decision is ...:: t h e><fi:<; nal • decision.of the City an:::;;s<>fi:zaladeffettv on te d:aynoce othe dec s on s ailed • . • •• • . • _ : • • . • •. .• • . •• • • •. • • • V. • •• • Page 1 • • DRAFT • • • • . •I • I • • V•it SECTION 5: Subsection 18.390.050.G. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: G. Final decision I Final decision. effective date and appeal. The decision of the lann ng-C rnnvss ona.Hearings Qf leer In:a Type`Ill appeal=action is final for purposes of appeal on the• mil . -'e` :>::: son it-is a ed. date�aric�eo�th ems......:.... ma;`fig :eaI a T`: Ut deci.nii ni to<ttie> it:::>Council b:::tUm <a� o� e'�af `>:>�>: �:vv.th.x�............cct�....�.v.t........... ....br�s....e :d `.s.a...t...e date-of ce<of tl e der s an s:mailed<' he Noti e<of A : .eal shat :be• in;the forms ;ecified>in< • procedc res>of Sect of s>18`.39.....:05.....C..F.shall:.:be.tbil+��v.ed..�n..the ................. apeat: • .. • • • • • . . . . •• _ • • - .. • • . •• • ., • . - .. u e� . n S.e.... .........13p.......;:.;;:.;;;:.;:.; :.;:;;;: : .; .>;;:.:�;:.:;;.�;;: < ;;:: .;�Q-;;� :. ?� Y !::::::::�::::Y::::::f':.:::i:::isF..:::i::i::: `'`��'gigT.=;: :>_ea1:ts:the:>f nal>decision:=r f tlie> :;:and:rs:final:and `` eate< 'ofceQfth .. . .s an.rs.�m led_.... etfcctivean:th::::.::.::::::;:n..::.:::;:.::.::.:.:�:.::::::::.::::::.�::::::::.�:::.�:::::::.�::::::.�::.�:::.: SECTION 6: Subsection 18.390.080.A.1.d. of the Tigard Community Development Code is • amended to read as follows: d. "Effective date" means the date on which a particular action or decision may be undertaken or otherwise implemented. or • decisions wvl ich are subject Wrevie x or appeal by any city cuneil, board oz of icer< k e e ect ve date ill norma€1 lie fl�o da`;:der the ca peal pe65a ki iali If am a::.' eal>is>dismissed<>aftei the a etiod:ba:$ipc. wed' the d.PCi:si.oii that«w s<tl ?sub ect`:oftlie S peal becomes;effeetiv.,e:at the:moment of_di$iritssal_ Final deeisions:of the City<those that are.no subfec to any Further..:ppeal:or:revie tl II'ecf>: e r�ne'firk <•'!!t�tr?!.;;:h;:;; Y�;;::�o.;:::;:;stria.::Y.:;.:;::::::;::;::u.::::��?;::!�;:.:b.;:Y<l?.;:.. ._::::::.::::::::.�._:.•• . • • • • • •. • • • • • • •.• , • • • • • • •.% • • .. • Page 2 • DRAFT • . • • • SECTION 7: Subsection 18.620.010.B. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: B. Development conformance. All new developments, including remodeling and renovation projects resulting in uses:>othertfanton-single family residential use, are expected to contribute to the character and quality of the area In addition to meeting the design standards described iiiVitg chapter below-and other development standards required by the i nit Development and Building Codes, such developments will be . required to: Dedicate and improve public streets, to tua e to t that si ch dedication t rip re ne, :t s.;..ue -ikia ;_and,rorefi 0.01:00al< an''im:..ct:g':h...d v..:.b :rzt... .. Connect to public facilities such as sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage; and 3. Participate in funding future transportation and otter public . improvement projects in withit-the Tigard Triangle, r d tt at there uireix3ent>to<: artiei .ate is<directl:' relat nd rou:>hl dof o de el «><>>e r ro"arfldaln:gym.a:..:.::..:::: :..:.::.:..:.:.:..:..:.:ran......:..: • SECTION 8: Subsection 18.810.020.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: • A. When standards apply, Unless otherwise provided, specifications-for-construction, reconstruction or repair of streets, sidewalks, curbs, and other public improvements withinrtl e Cityshall occur in accordance with the standards of this title. No development may occur the ><»:>r:::::::::>::� unless e ublic td<ii'� aad�'s �e� . .��ed es t related to development comply;with the public facility requirements established in this section and ade';uate '`' blic t'aciliti:s.:are:ava.il ble. > im :.0.01ents ?n ::.> lieci.t...e...... u...ed..e..ac._ ..... ........_....: ... ta..e...to. nd roughly:" ro 006.041 :005 .ac.. ..the.d. .. o m i tv • SECTION 9: Subsection 1'8.810.030.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: A. Improvements. 1. No development shall occur unless the development has frontage or • Page 3 • • • DRAFT approved access to a public street. 2. Tc� evetvpment s a I ctr unless sbree{s wttlun the deutQpxnen meet:::'he standards''`f 'is?cha:ter is 3 ��dee��rpnent.s�..��.�ceur.urtleSs fh�.streets;�dlar�r�_�a.fi�e itoo kpm o Imopitki4.mutaratift this ehapter,pr wtded,however • that>a d euelo"�ment>ma7 be ap rovedif the> 'aceri .; tree_.d e.....:::: <:.�:;:.p.;::<::::<:::<::;::::Y :::;,;::,;Pp;;_;::::.�.:::::::::.�.>:.�::,:�:.;:::J::;.�.�:;:Y.�tr�et;�t�es;n�t meet>the>siandard ut<half:street>improvemeints>meeting': .... sty dards`(f t-.�`s`title``.:° :<':::: ? ':>°::::>:t<;::> >:;>.> :><.::>;:::nt't::::< :::>><,'-::>:.><:> .::::::::;:::>;<::<::>::::> .....in : ; :.;: ifii ;;. ; ar....cons:04 0jacent fo fie ktevet4.6(40 . • 4. Any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall . . .. . . • . .... • . ... . . . ..' this-code tneet the staff to' s>ri ` s>el "ter ................................................................... 5. w • • provd >streei poveme:ntsthe City Engineer may accept a future improvements guarantee in lieu of street improvements if one or _ more of the following conditions exist: • a. A partial improvement is not feasible due to the inability to• achieve property design standards; b. A partial improvement may create a potential safety hazard to motorists or pedestrians; c. Due to the nature of existing development on adjacent properties it is unlikely that street improvements would be • extended in the foreseeable future and.the improvement • associated with the project under review does not, by itself, provide a significant improvement to street safety or capacity; • d. The improvement would be in conflict with an adopted capital improvement plan; e. The improvement is associated with an approved land partition on property zoned residential and the proposed land partition does not create any new streets; or f. Additional planning work is required to define the . • appropriate design standards for the street and the application is for a project which would contribute only a • Page 4 • • DRAFT • minor portion of the anticipated future traffic on the street. • 6. `Ther staiciardsoft}ischapterEriclidsehe staniaicl specifications �.a: - a z�+x �`�� z • adoptedli the Citty#Engin'et ursu ant to.. Section l°88:10,-02QtB • 7. •- - • . . _ • : : ; features such as wetlands, steep slopes or existing mature trees. eapp oval authontymayap ove adjunents:tothe standards f�tlus cha ter�ifcomphance with�the-staffidardswould result n an dversetimpact on naturaltkea res suctps wetlan•s 1-.teep•slopes, • o °exishn ature trees"a e a 6 royal autho maa sofa._=rove � p •iij store tto he standards1of his chap a om liaricea Wth the fandardswold'hae a suWarit a4 ers mpact•on e•�fisting tP 1 •evelo men Ald ieclude •evelopmentton the.,property here herdevelopmentitsiproposed In approving an dj sfinient exception to the standards, the approval authority shall determine • standards •alarice=the'benefit offheadj.usiiient w,ilhtheblm•act on the public interest4represented'by tithekstzn aids. In evaluating the public benefit.,impaction theAp bhinterest, the approval authority shall consider the criteria listed in Section 18.810.030.E.1 ' alifstment to the standaro srnay not be grand-I :theta just nen lk _ � woudrispublic'safety. SECTION 10: Subsection 18.810.070.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: A. Sidewalks A:117inal s ahah llhave sdewalksmeeinCity °sta dards along onesi e of the steee Alit Hier streei:sKKshanzhavee � ,may . ; S sid eetingaCzty tan d .along botch s ies f thhhee= eetP4, developmentimay be •provedn adjormng streethas siaQwa ksFori he sidejadjoining th evelopment=eve if no idewa k exists onnhe`rome side o thestreet . - - • •• } e •• • • • • - . . • . • -- . • • •• • • • •• • • Page 5 • • • • • • _• . •, • . r • • •.•• • • • r • O. • • • r• •• r • r • 41 • • r • • • • ••• • • • • • r • • .and • • • 3. Oi1 oilc si&L, of any indust►ial sticct tv bc- onstiuctcd at the tiiilc of .• • • • • I . • • • • r • . '• • SECTION 11: Subsection.18.810.080.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: • A. Dedication Requirements. • 1. Where a proposed park, playground or other public use shown in a development plan adopted by the•City is located in whole or in part in a subdivision, the Commission may require the dedication or reservation of such area within the subdivision,`prvde tha the :» .. �r... di anon is roughly propoz onal.to the impact of :tie>s bdiv s on'on he pal s >:ste rt .................................................. 2. Where considered desirable by the Commission in accordance with adopted comprehensive plan policies, and where a development plan of the City does not indicate proposed public use areas, the Commission may require the dedication or reservation of areas • • within the subdivision or sites of a character, extent and location suitable for.the development of parks Oland other public use, .<ro rided`that<he re ery on or edi i n r r"':g l... r. rti u'l to;th'e m':actofthesubdivision:on:the:: ark: :`.stem SECTION 12: Subsections 18.810.110.A. and B. of the•Tigard Community Development Code are amended to read as follows.: A. Bikeway extension. Developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified • on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through dedication of easements or rih - a provided..s ch..dedica'Cf::>::::: :;:::::> 1:::,<::::>:.;:;;>:<>::::�>:<>�:>::::>��:::>:::::::<:><;:-� »::::>::<:::>'�>�:_ g..................... yr ? : : . ..:. :.: onas d rectfy related Lo and roughly pr..P.:;rt ;n:l . tie mpact f the riEVelopment,. B. Cost of construction. Development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvement zt an:amount rou hl;;::; ro .oct�onal;:;to;::t#:�e im .:act:'of the levelo :ment< Page 6 DRAfT • SECTION.13: The Tigard Community Development Code is amended by adding a new subsection 18.810.020.E. to read as follows: • :..:,. ::.::c p.:::.:.s p.ovided in Section 18 SlO O3 ?S as used in tius chapter,the } tei n:;::::struts'shall mean t ublic str s"un less>�n:<ad:usfia iei t under gff\acm\90024\codeamend.rd 1(6/4/99) • • • • • • • • • Page 7 • EXHIBIT B• Agenda Item: 5. 2_ Hearing Date: July 19. 1999 1 an.,a3 V" *." 1 I I , i �; — -as '�,� *r'' •' '' r.. . a .. m -1 'i -,: k, s ,„*tAt ...F ;o tmss,i`i.,..x;. Y ,-.4,r ,,,i�w• .t^ ._ k-' i`G...v:., Y ~1f to Yy � .T ..°�S6.t.£- ,, , 'Ii �!fH'=A3• a.ata";"tf vg '.- a '7 z .,. 73'x .. .,, °at; � :"C'C. . ,. 2� �i.. 'S' .t .. 1,,,Z...' >< '.'.'. t � 5' 3� -r"r'+' , C',./ 5. t' `x w ,..' ^,,....._.5• it t fia mm o � � ! '_ IT f�jl F ' i I REGON t o x �' .~ .. SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY • • FILE NAME: CLARIFYING AMENDMENTS RELATING TO FINAL DECISIONS. EFFECTIVE DATES. APPEAL REQUIREMENTS. DEVELOPMENT CONFORMANCE. STANDARDS APPLICABILITY. AND DEDICATION AND IMPROVEMENTS REQUIREMENTS. CASE: Zone Ordinance Amendment ZOA 1999-00002 PROPOSAL: The City of Tigard proposes clarification amendments to the Tigard Community Development Code language in Sections 18.340.020.G., 18.390.040.F., 18.390.040.G.2:c., 18.390.040.H., 18.390.050.G., 18.390.080.A.1.d., 18.620.010.B., 18.810.020.A., 18.810.020.E., 18.810.030.A.. 18.810.070.A., 18.810.080.A. and 18.810.110.A. & B. to better define Final Decisions, Effective Dates, Appeal Requirements, Development Conformance, Standards Applicability, and Dedication and Improvements Requirements. APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER: N/A 13125 SW Hall Boulevard • Tigard, Oregon 97223 ZONING DESIGNATION: N/A LOCATION: Citywide APPLICABLE REVIEW . CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 3 and 11; Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1.a., 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 7 and°8; and Community Development Code Sections 18.380.020 and 18.390.060.G. . SECTION IL STAFF RECOMMENDATION 4....„ t C'� y{,a a5 z� ...•,ea+t_Z "s` * ., v yew c: -— . '' a*t..c#nr % 1 12 d eco a m 5.e nds r?, he , Gam issi©n'f i d T at:--,- © s Qn el l ► o ' ae doe, s dverse , ere ee p© -.0 ro mase 1 . 9 ', :% a,. � d C3 ,X: �- .. �"' aru ., . < e. co x. m t...-1 e s ,• P• •OVA : ur b'e1 ct f ?o low- n1 g»-ecom. mei ded'*con c itio s'cil f,�' �;" rq n, :;2 r^a --'C. f . �4, e- wy ti 4 .= ��`2).W.� ' Whz " t+ t cr 'i f P.ro a1 �, , t '» U . m c - 14.1 ; t 6 a 3f, „ - rk1?,r}.aL.y :),- ,- .,, } Jt4^4-'iN.-,, , .4. x xt:.- ., ,„ 7/19/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 1 of 3 ZOA 1999-00002/CLARIFYING CODE AMENDMENTS • • SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION City Staff has been working with the City Attorney's office to clarify ambiguities in Development Code language relating to public improvements, effective dates and final decisions. It clarifies that Type II procedures concludes with appeal to the Hearings Officer as was intended and written originally. Amendments to improvement requirements and- relative to dedication provide for,greater assurance of compliance with Dolan. Ordinance language as drafted by the City Attorney's office is attached.. Additions are redlined and deletions shown by strikeout. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The relevant criteria in this case are Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 3 and 11; Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1.a., 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 7 and 8;.and Community Development Code Chapter 18.390. The proposal is consistent with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals based on the following findings: 1. Goal 1, Citizen Involvement, is met because the City has followed its adopted citizen involvement program which involved review by its Citizen Involvement Team structure, and public hearings as listed above. The City's Citizen Involvement Policies in the Comprehensive Plan have been acknowledged to be in compliance with Goal 1. Notice for all hearings was provided in the Tigard. Times which summarized and outlined the amendments being made to existing code provisions and was done so for each public hearing. Copies of the ordinance drafts have been available at least seven days prior to the hearings which follows Community Development Code Procedure. . 2. Goal 2, Land Use Planning, is met because the City applied all relevant Statewide Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan Policies and Community Development Code requirements in review of this proposal. 3. Goal 3, Natural Features and Open Space are met because these.policies call for development control of floodplains and greenway areas and these provisions provide a tool consistent with recent case law to assess the impact and need for. improvements, reservations and dedication that is roughly proportional to the impact of the development. 4. Goal 11, Public Facilities and Services and Goal 12 Transportation, are met because the proposed measures assist in implementing the provision of public facilities and services, and transportation facilities in a more timely, orderly and efficient manner to provide better defined levels of service improvements consistent to the impacts of those developments. 7/19/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 2 of 3 ZOA 1999-00002/CLARIFYING CODE AMENDMENTS • • The proposal is consistent with the City's acknowledged Comprehensive Plan based on the following findings: 1. Policies 1.1.1.a. and. c. are satisfied because the proposed code changes are • consistent with Statewide Planning Goals as indicated above and the changes help to keep the development code current with local needs and recent case law. 2. Policies 2.1.1 and 2.1.3 are satisfied because the proposal has been reviewed at public hearings and through the City's Public Involvement process. 3. The proposed changes are consistent with the provisions of Comprehensive Plan Policies 7, Public Facilities and Services and 8, Transportation which call for ensuring that as a precondition to development, developments coincide with the availability of adequate services and that development is to provide streets and right-of-way consistent with City standards. The proposed changes clarify ambiguities in existing code language that will help to assure compliance with Dolan. 4. Community Development Code Section 18.390.060.G. which establishes procedures for legislative code changes is satisfied according to the above findings. No other applicable Metro, federal or state regulations apply. • SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Engineering Department, Police Department, and Building Division have reviewed the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS GTE, NW Natural Gas Co., Cablevision, PGE, Metro Area Communications, US West Communications, Tri-Met Transit Development, Washington County Dept. of Land Use & Transportation, Metro Area Boundary Commission, Oregon. DLCD, ODOT and members of the Citizen Involvement Teams have all had the opportunity to review the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. • No other comments have been received. VAA'_ 6/30/99 PREPARED BY: Richard Bew: M DATE Planning Ma ager 7/19/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 3 of 3 ZOA 1999-00002/CLARIFYING CODE AMENDMENTS SO III • -- - -I _ i% 435 490 381 I I Z 463 . 251 271 A-Gtoph s • ostal Service US Postal Service ceipt for Certified Mail Receipt for Certified Mail Metro Oregon Dept. of Land Conservation & Devi' ATTN: LAND USE & PLANNING dATTN: LARRY FRENCH 600 NE Grand Avenue $1635 Capital Street NE, Suite 150 Portland, OR 97232-2736 ► Salem, OR 97301-2540 • a a Postage $ C Postage $ ).,a,\ ,.1 ., Certified Fee ) L( V N Certified Fee 1 1 0 Special Delivery Fee Special Delivery Fee \ p p ry Restricted Delivery Fee �� Restricted Delivery F 23 \`1/40 rn Return Receipt Sh,,;:;to% S rn Return Receipt Sho fg, \� Whom&Date D:I-. -- Whom&Date DGv / �►�, V, < Return Receipt ee til Whom, O Return Addressee's ee's in,,to A ' i� < Date,&Addressee 9Cd� • - � ' < Date,&Addressee's C���c a y o TOTAL postage � _� TOTAL Postage&Feea�/,,,,� y/ cl Postmark or Date •..���� € Postmark or Date ��`n I° ON LL b D C„ a ai SENDER: I also wish to receive the :0 •Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. following services(for an (7) ■Complete items 3,4a,and 4b. i. a> ■Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this extra fee): I ;n card to you. d ■Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space does not 1.❑ Addressee's Address iu permit. 2.❑ Restricted Delive i ,t •Write"Return Receipt Requested"on the mailpiece below the article number. Delivery t ■The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date c Z 4 6 3 2 5 1 2 7 0 • � delivered. Consult postmaster for fee. 1 1 O 3.Article Addressed to: 4a.Articl Number �1 Postal Service won./eej'oiox,.c1strict-�-i9 Z. `f�3 z - a]a c H !ceit for Certified Mail o. 4b.Service Type jams Isle-5, Ana oa/1st ❑ Registered Certified c ODOT– Region 1, District 2-A ❑ Express Mail 0 Insured ' Jane Estes, Permit Specialist �1y0 Cc, 5a 4" c7rivt!,s(l C 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD c 5440 SW Westgate Drive, Suite 350 girl-and t)K. 9`��aA,�y/y 7. Date of Delivery 1 ) Portland, OR 97221-2414 i p. ,j 5.Received By: (Print Name) 8.Addressee's Address(Only if requested r Postage $ r 1 \'1 and fee is paid) e ) `>, 1 j Certified Fee `-t "gn:to re: d ssee or Ag t) ' -l t Q Qom. FI N p, W - Special Delivery Fee y - . F. 3811, December 1994 102595-98-8-0229 Domestic Return Receipt W. Restricted Delivery Fee u,' /�+i �L Whom&Date Deh ZZ (-., S p . Return Receipt .ate < Date,&Addressee' 5 - r ea rn N l i j O TOTAL Postage �� I; a— CO cl Postmark or Date V o .°Nbl 1�2 - t u_ —' U) • o_ • 0 , i')10 Dm"- 4 6?-11 av`-' • • - - , I ai SENDER: • I also wish to receive the : 1. 2 •Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. following services(for an rn •Complete items 3,4a,and 4b. 0) •Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this extra fee): ;n card to you. > •Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space does not 1.❑ Addressee's Address •r ` Write" 2.❑ Restricted Delivery o ■Write"Return Receipt Requested°on the mailpiece below the article number. ry Cl) ■The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date▪ delivered. Consult postmaster for fee. a O 3.Article Addressed to: 4a.Article Number o Z4 3 l5j ?7/ ;,Oeson Of l,G.«l t°a�sr >s,�.0 s Lev. . B. 4b.Service Type 8 c ^ L LN•• Aa-rr11 /CjiC,' _ ❑ Registered [i3 Certified 15' J o) / /� ��a l- Express Mail ❑ Insured C (O 3� ` i � �� �� ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD 3 $ /e' i Of( ?7341-02-5W 4 7. Date of Deli? / �G TI 0 k 5.Received By: (Print Name) 8.Addressee's Addres (Only if requested Y I and fee is paid) 6.Sigl -:01,•r;-;--o Agtt)if it(94/..., iE I w PS Form 3811,December 1994 102595-98-B-0229 Domestic Return Receipt ■ • a; SENDER: I also wish to receive the • o •Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. following services(for an N •Complete items 3,4a,and 4b. a) •Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this extra fee): I • i card to you. V at •Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space does not 1.❑ Addressee's Address , permit. a •Write"Return Receipt Requested°on the mailpiece below the article number. 2.❑ Restricted Delivery a) 2 ■The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date Consult postmaster for fee. o • delivered. O• 3.Article Addressed to: 4a.Article Number o e4ro z 9.53--'/9O 38/ cc a 4b.Service Type / «• E , Ti7• 1`u u.� 8//czri i/� 0 Registered Certified ; • • /(2 ero /VC G 4 tGf,u e_ . ❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured 2. ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD fbr.�-/a.. ..7( 17.2,30.- 273( 7. D elivery o -.. /T' - 1 0' 5.Received By: (Print Name) 8.Addressee's Address(Only if requested • and fee is paid) m r 6.Signat r : (Addles ee or Agent) - ~1 ' w PS Form 3811,December 1994 102595=9e-B-0229 "Domestic Return Receipt `I • • 1,1 TIGARD CITY. COUNCIL _ • i r BUSINESS°MEETING 2AUGUST10 11:99 P4 : 6:30'P • CITY OF TIGARD 4TIG ARD CITY;HALL° ' 13125}SW:HALL?BLVD.% ikii:..,:.N T;•A.'1t,+i ve ✓4 yr'+ :TIGARD" OREGO 997223 '°4 . PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above: 639- 4171, x309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA COUNCIL AGENDA—AUGUST 10, 1999 - PAGE 1 • • TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 10, 1999 AGENDA 6:30 PM • STUDY SESSION > EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1 ) (d), (e), 8t (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. As you are aware, all discussions within this session are confidential; therefore those present may disclose nothing from this meeting. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend this session, but must not disclose any information discussed during this session. > Discussion: . Wilsonville Withdrawal from the Metropolitan Area Communications Commission > Discussion: Review of Council Ground Rules 7:30 PM 1 . * BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications . 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items > INTRODUCE FINANCE DIRECTOR CRAIG PROSSER • City Manager 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please) 3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 3.1 Approve Council Minutes: June 15, 22, 29, 1999 3.2 Receive and File: a) Tentative Agenda b) Council Calendar c) Expenditure of Civil Forfeiture Funds COUNCIL AGENDA—AUGUST 10, 1999 - PAGE 2 • • 3.3 Initiate Vacation of a Portion of Main Street Right-of-Way North of Existing Roadway - Resolution No. 99- 3.4 Amend Resolution No. 99-18 — Correct Calculation Error in Fee Increases for Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Electrical Permit and Related Fees — Resolution No. 99- • Consent Agenda - Items Removed for Separate Discussion: Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 4. UPDATE: CITY OF TIGARD YOUTH VOLUNTEERS • City Administration 5. .PUBLIC HEARING (Legislative) - TEMPORARY SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Ordinance amending Tigard Municipal Code sections 2.52.010 and 18.780.120(C) to declare signs in the public right-of-way as abandoned property and establish a retrieval fee.for sign owners. a. Open Public Hearing b. Declarations or Challenges c. Summation by Staff d. Public Testimony (Proponents, Opponents) e. Recommendation by Community Development Department f. Council Questions or Comments g. Close Public Hearing h. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 99- 6. PUBLIC HEARING (Legislative) - BUILDING FEES INCREASE Adopt a new fee schedule for permits issued under the Oregon Structural Specialty Code. a. Open Public Hearing b. Declarations or Challenges c. Summation by Staff d. . Public Testimony (Proponents, Opponents) e. Recommendation by Community Development Department f. Council Questions or Comments g. Close Public Hearing h. Council Consideration: Resolution No. 99- COUNCIL AGENDA—AUGUST 10, 1999 - PAGE 3 • J 7. PUBLIC HEARING(Legislative) =—COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE 7 AMENDMENTS The City of Tigard proposes to amend the Tigard Community Development Code Chapter 18 to clarify existing code language relating to Final Decisions, Effective Dates, Appeal Requirements, Development Conformance, Standards Applicability, and Dedication and Improvements Requirements. a. Open Public Hearing b. Declarations or Challenges c. Summation by Staff d. Public Testimony (Proponents, Opponents) e. Recommendation by Community Development Department f. Council Questions or Comments g. Close Public Hearing h. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 99- 8. CITY/METRO INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF METRO-OWNED GREENSPACE PROPERTY • Community Development Department • Council Discussion • Council Consideration: Motion authorizing the Mayor to sign an Intergovernmental Agreement with Metro for the development and management of a Metro-purchased 6-acre property abutting the City's 3- acre Woodard Park. 9. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS 10. NON AGENDA ITEMS 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1 ) (d), (e), 8t (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. As you are aware, all discussions within this session are confidential; therefore those present may disclose nothing from this meeting. Representatives of the news media' are allowed to attend this session, but must not disclose any information discussed during this session. 12. ADJOURNMENT I:\ADM\CATHY\CCA\990810P.D OC COUNCIL AGENDA—AUGUST 10, 1999 - PAGE 4 ID • ' I'\ CITY OF TIGARD FACT SHEET 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Contact: Dick Bewersdorff, (503) 639-4171 AGENDA: August 10, 1999 TOPIC: Ordinance clarifying various sections of the CDC BACKGROUND: Staff has been working with the City Attorney's office and the City Council concerning various provisions in the Development Code that needs clarification. Some of the sections and proposed amendments relate to the US Supreme Court decision in 1994 relating to dedication and rough proportionality. Amendments relating to this issue provide greater assurance of compliance with Dolan. Other sections have been found to be ambiguous. The Council approved a Director's Interpretation concerning some of the issues on July 13, 1999. The attached proposed ordinance amendments were drafted by the City Attorney's office and are another step in the evolution of improving the code. The Planning Commission recommended approval after a public hearing on July 19, 1999. COST: NA is\curpin\dick\claamd.fac 1 • AGENDA ITEM#: FOR AGENDA OF: August 10. 1999 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Ordinance Clarifying Various Sections of the Community Development Code PREPARED BY:Dick B DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Should the City Council adopt the attached ordinance and findings to clarify the intent and wording of the Code? STAFF RECOMMENDATION • Adopt the attached ordinance and findings. INFORMATION SUMMARY Staff has been working with the City Attorney's office and with the City Council concerning various provisions of the Development Code that need clarification. Some of the sections and proposed amendments relate to the US Supreme Court decision in 1994 relating to dedication and rough proportionality. Amendments relative to this issue provide greater assurance of compliance with Dolan. Other sections have been found to be ambiguous as to meaning. The Council approved a Director's Interpretation concerning some of the issues on July 13, 1999. The attached proposed ordinance amendments were drafted by the City Attorney's Office and are another step in the evolution of improving the code language. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 19, 1999 and.recommended approval of the amendments. The staff report and ordinance language is attached. Additions are redlined and deletions are shown with strikeout. Changes include some relating to public improvement as well as some relating to procedure, including clarification of effective dates. For Type II procedures, the revisions make it clear that the final local appeal is to the Hearings Officer. This is as was intended in the code rewrite and is consistent with the City Attorney's conclusion of existing ambiguous language in the code. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Leave ordinance as is. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY NA FISCAL NOTES NA i:\cwpin\dick\claamd.sum • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO.99- A ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA 1999-00002) TO AMEND PROVISIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.CODE BY ADOPTING CLARIFYING AMENDMENTS TO SECTIONS 18.340.020.G., 18.390.040.F., 18.390.040.G.2.c., 18.390.040.H., 18.390.050.G., 18.390.080.A:1.d., 18.620.010.B., 18.810.020.A., 18.810.020.E., 18.810.030.A., 18.810.070.A., 18.810.080.A. AND 18.810.110.A. & B. TO BETTER DEFINE FINAL DECISIONS, EFFECTIVE DATES, APPEAL REQUIREMENTS, DEVELOPMENT CONFORMANCE, STANDARDS APPLICABILITY, AND DEDICATION AND IMPROVEMENTS REQUIREMENTS. WHEREAS, the City of Tigard finds it necessary. to revise the Community Development Code periodically to improve the operation and implementation of the Code; and WHEREAS, some of the wording in the Code could be termed ambiguous;and WHEREAS, the City of Tigard is continually evolving its response to the 1994 Supreme Court decision relating to dedication and"rough proportionality"; and WHEREAS, the City of Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 19, 1999 regarding the above listed amendments; and WHEREAS, the City of Tigard Planning Commission voted to recommend the revised Code sections shown in Exhibit"A"; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on August 10, 1999 to consider the amendments. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The proposed amendments are consistent with all relevant criteria based on the facts and conclusions noted in the attached staff report(Exhibit B). SECTION 2: The specific text amendments attached to this Ordinance are hereby adopted and approved by the City Council. SECTION 3: This Ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only,this day of , 1999. Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of , 1999. James Nicoli,Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney ORDINANCE NO. 99- Page 1 of 1 S . 1111 . . EXHIBIT A • TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE • • PROPOSED REVISIONS REDLINE/STRIKEOUT VERSION . SECTION 1: Subsection 18.340.020.G. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: • G. Final decision/effective date. The decision of the City Council on an appeal of a Director Interpretation shall be final and ggotixowhen'iii5Mairth4.::40grei it-is mailed to the apPlicant,..Mii., the decision is Thal and decision is . •, • . . . • . 91/ • • O, • • • WI • I •• • • • • . 111• :11. 119 11 • • • II • • V jurisdiction. SECTION 2: Subsection 18.390.040.F. of the Tigard Community.Development Code is amended to read as follows: F. Final decision and effective date. A Type II Administrative Decision is final for purposes of appeal when:.646016t Ogigigii it-is mailed. A Type II Administrative Decision becomes is-effective on the day after the appeal period expires, unless an If an appealisfiledthe, appeal period has.expired,the Type II Administratwe Deelsion becomes effaive on dismissal of the appeal 5.0.1.01M".0. • SECTION 3: Subsection 18.390.040.G.2.c. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: c. Appeal procedures. Type III notice and hearing procedures shall be used for all Type II Administrative Appeals, as provided in Sections 18.390.050• C - SECTION 4: Subsection 18.390.040.H. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: • H. Final decision and effective date. The decision of the Hearings Officer with • regard-to-anr0 appeal of a Type II Administrative-decision is the final decision of the City and is final and effective on the day notice of the : • - . . VIP VI 11 • III • 11 I . O • • V. • Page 1 • • • • S. '•111RAF • • • • • VI • III 1 • • II • • • • • • V„ a .. 1111 • 11, V • V . • • appeal-is-resolved: SECTION 5: Subsection 18.390.050.G. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: • G. Final decision Final decision. effective date and appeal. The decision of the RevievrAtrthoritroir mmType Ill appeal-400 is final for purposes of appeal on the . •• _ . date 0.0.egptio.o:depAgog it-is maned. Any pgary.mtt startat.tg N. tiAttggtiggigtttiOR10.401q4:iikiiii.b:00:8300.41.10A1).iiatoviti:It procedures ofSections toithattilifissiolgalia68.6siato.6554. ifatodopta „:„:"v::: • • • • 4141. 4!:. • • " • • • • • • dell • VI I • ell • II, • • • • VIP • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• Type III appeal is the fina' decision ofthe City and is final and flat:00E4 ato,tiv.o.:011.::thwammottm:o.fittiouagortx$:::matoto SECTION 6: SubseCtion.18.390.080.A.1.d. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: • d. "Effective date" means the date on which a particular action or decision may be undertaken or otherwise implemented. For 4P:!-9m.1.9.11twf:t!91.tAmglIFJP.%ri:f:AY.1.gl*PAgppgAt:b.EgoNgi..trirpunq4 01 oflcer,the effective date will normally be the day after the appeal pend expires If an appeal is dismissed after the appeal period has exptred the deeision that was the subject ftlie appeal • b0.9.01-0*Off0gtimkg.b :OlgtogOtiAE41$5iii$44Lii:if#i41:4001.$ki.0:00 the City(those that are not subject to any further appeal or review • Yot!Wt4City):::4c.:p.:1.1.9.rmallygfrootty.0:141pa:tbgyb.-goom :fig.a: • • • . • • . • S • •• V • • - • 1 . • . • . * • IS • V IV • V • • • • 11 • • 1 " after the • • Page 2 • S • [t R IMT • SECTION 7: Subsection 18.620.O10.B. of the Tigard Community Development Code is • amended to read as follows: • • B. Development conformance. All new developments, including remodeling and renovation projects resulting in uses otherttainon-single family • . .. ....:....:.....:::.::.. residential use, are expected to contribute to the character and quality of the area In addition to meeting the design standards described lid> 's chapter below and other development standards required by the Comm nit Development and Building Codes, such developments will be • .::...:...:...::..:...:.. required to: `< Dedicate and improve public streets to the tent that uc d improvement s directly related and>roi hl„"� rOOK1: €t0>azirrri saIit.... . ....4. .txlezlX ti Connect to public facilities such as sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage; and 3. Participate in funding future transportation and other public improvement projects iri within-the Tigard Triangle, prov ded that the re uirement to artici ate s:::iir:.ectl':id at``:;and rou� ::.y: SECTION 8: Subsection 18.810.020.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: A. When standards apply. Unless otherwise provided, the-standard specificatiotsdorconstruction, reconstruction or repair of streets, sidewalks, curbs, and other public improvements shall occur • in accordance with the standards of this title. No development may occur ......................................... ..................................................................... ............................................................................................................... 1 the public facilities ;<d> >°:aart; ,,;>.>>"li ;°,tiori>..;:a`> ��>�:.;�:.>�:.>�::> i unless t e ub c fac t es app:.;;��:::.::::.::.::�?.::Y.;:.::.;:;;�pl�:.:�;..�;: : P related to development coe m tpo ly::with the.; public faci lit y requirements established estab li h ed in this section adadiq :atgPubitc'Iiks aeavaabe:: . d'�d" terl`:u d a:<:>d<`bwtd<required ublic i�1:;".'`'I�e�ntrr�:.:b:.:ire.. ..u..:d.:.:..:::..�...�.:.:.:.:.:.�.anti.:..n...:.�....z.:...�.::..:.......:...-...: :............ tovi'v me$:till_i .h n t_ a requires i e act];'<tt is dir ctl iie f :. `_: :>d roughly`pro 'oit o al to:;thiiY. :::.:'r'i::ry::f:i:_.::/.yi:i::?i:::i:i:L:'yi ;; :�:;: e rm :act;: f:the dev..elc ment:Y SECTION 9: Subsection 18.810.030.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: A. Improvements. 1. No development shall occur unless the development has frontage or • Page 3 • • • • DRA[FT . • approved access to a public street. 2. `deelopment s a v ::: s st�r+ s tv�thm � erQpen . meet `: e<stai dards f h s eha�pter<> 3 400o,ment meet>: e sta Ards<f:t s ha terx::: rou d.:;:::°::h o ver that a>deveto ;m nt:ma be:a .roved tf the ad acent street does not >:>eet `:>:,: m..:..:.:the:st.............:..::..:.....:�......::..:...:..:..:::....... ...:..:u�emeiats= et `stir ......................................... ......................................................................................................................... ::: :;:fl.t h:s>tt e ar < ostted >:<d`4ce>:;::._ :»:>-;::::«:<.> »::>::>:>::::<:::::>:::<:>:>::>::< Sfa �ards::.:�:..;tu.:::..:.t:.:::...::.:::..:..:..:.:.:.:.._::.:..:..::�... ...:..:::nt::.�.: :e:c�e�e�o.:nneztt,. • 4. Any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall . . . . • . . • . • . . . . . . this-code trieet e sfiar dare s tl s> a Met .................................................................... • 5. the Ci. uld and ould> therwise:r: sire: tie:>a : licant<tc zvce>sreetihproenAeus th e City Engineer veer ma accept o fixture improvements guarantee in lieu of street improvements if one or _ more of the following conditions exist: a. A partial improvement is not feasible due to the inability to• achieve property design standards; b. A partial improvement may create a potential safety hazard to motorists or pedestrians; c. Due to the nature of existing development on adjacent properties it is unlikely that street improvements would be extended in the foreseeable future and.the improvement associated with the project under review does not, by itself, provide a significant improvement to street safety or • capacity; d. The improvement would be in conflict with an adopted capital improvement plan; e. The improvement is associated with an approved land •• partition on property zoned residential and the proposed • land partition does not create any new streets; or f. Additional planning work is required to define the appropriate design standards for the street and the • application is for a project which would contribute only a Page 4 • • .,. ,. • R A,:k t..1• . minor portion of the anticipated future traffic on the street. . 6. rlieiSfaiiairdS7'6:f,thiSeligiiiefellicTe3f.,hie.'SfafirarEC:SfireeffieSiibliS, 1,--:---,,,..5,=.,-„,.,.rc• '1,—;1::-.:77,;•,-z-gC•1‘,'Vkg,-,4:141,:: '4,1:,,,,p!to'riV.‘--,.:,:0,.. • ad.bp tegtby,,,41.1.eeityalgiridenipursttailt4eetitinVii88410:020 Ai s;?...4.1,‘,- .., .L..,.:,.;,,,,;,:,:,,,-,Z,,Z 1r •,. -s.4.1i1.7....„J 7. . — . - : : -"- - : -- - : .:- • : : -2 : . : : : -: . . - . • . . . .- - - • . - :- . - :: "-- : : - -- : : :: -: :- - : : -•-- : : " • . • . . . . Tlfea:Aireal.r,aliilik5iiitPitiaY.Vii''ro'Ve6fdjiatiie'trtO "0. Vt. ..51fheigfatiffaidg • ,x.T.%A-,?,-ftlrag.?r4;tk'ssigmtrg4:-=,T,w40:- .'toiji. ..zT3s,'t' wo,,TmtFaqg.e,tr,q, 0,141-itSVehapterIffomplaancetWithithestandardsAvdtild5resultorvan t74:45APiga:...wm*vetc,,v,Nw4V,V:AMwz.k",.,k4ttiesvOgio.g,4Twwatr,.,.1' . liclverspl'mpactKonmatUfa f, eatures,such.aspvetlanUseilsteeprslipp:M oreexiStinganatureAtrgesATheAapprovattauthorttrgiapolsokqprove adjustments to itheistpdards i.`c)fithiszehapiteroificoxriphancely,/,ithilas IandareisfiWoultiihaVe:g.sttbst4.ntfilldversejniVact 1F.antexisting T'::-O.F,r-"i::SLP4ais-tlagt-20"Vt,:ftVlAIVIUSVCV.WV;;;'iariJiii;:4,;i0siaa'r evito,pmeritronwouldlpreclune,oevelop,rnenton.ttsproperty ---20:,,,g:P.Y .,-.,-, ArliereitheZeyelopm'efiti'S'proposedli In approving an .44.tus,,trp,,,erit, . ,,,....-.„,-,, .,..----Av.:,;:lbaA.,. 1...g.-oa,'..44;,,,ese:fo-,•:a ,,--40Fe.&-,,4 exception to the standards, the approval authority shall El•eteffnine . .--, - - Standards 151.1aitWhalb:efiefitraTthWdjitsTtirenttwithlthelitnia,:c ilrevulfilkeiinterestirepresentedthyathe,_standardS. In evaluating the . . .. iggr,..-.1).ztr-4 . publie-beftefits iiii.pActrOnAh4ublicAnterest, the approval authority shall consider the criteria listed in Section 18.810.030 E 1 . . - adrifSfinetiVeklie7stiridaIdS.Mia-Y:netlEelialitecliffalteadji4Ment 1• ,k:,•4.r:-'-'4:::-Ir4:1-Arw.,-14gt-q-%-,;.- -=---' '' - - ' " -—'-. ' . ' - ' ' ' twouldlisk-ptibli'esafety. •,.--,-e..„,,,,;,-;,,,,,•,,,,,,......;..,,,....---, ----,, . • • SECTION 10: Subsection 18.810.070.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code is • amended to read as follows: • A. Sidewalks rfilijilitiiiStriWirM7sIllniaVeiirer"-WakWiVairgre-iiy7 ta wr-•:•-iwolf.747.--e4A3av-1-4-..-14•15?‘•'•,,,,,,,,,,*- --,--"••54•Kigizer:-.11•41;;;1-•"''''grq. rak.04-1.• gfiiird'S,,aldrig',OttesideroPthestreet .ltiother streetslshaVhave • street 11 Si4eWalICS4neePTIgiejtKL"PStandar Sa2105ngQZ otristadsjettne :8.N. r:Tt-..:.z-ti-,A„1::: 7-VOtetAtT'M'Sg0,7",ra-Cf«;,:00'.W-;:3.0V..-3,'‘;‘ ,14''f-'-ii'.••:VAMP Eirr,.. -- -,.4 . developinent4nly.ibe=approved iftan,•=adjoiningstree4has sidewalks the . Side-tadjoitungthe,developmeritveven-,ifsilasid'ewalh.ekists.:ionithe,titherSide . . Ciftli6Street. . :- • - • :- : • -. -:, -; • -: : -:• -: 8,........;-...'"..',.I.40.1....,..X.,1 ' .. . leeated-as-fellewsi • ' • . . . e .1: - t. - : . - - . . -: : - : -- : :- :. • - - -- - : str-eet-c-enstffie-tien, • _._ 2,- e :: • •:- : • : •- -- . • : •• : :- •. • -. - •• - • . • : . . . • . Page 5 . . • . . #M^ss<_ • WRAF _ -. -. . ., . • . . • . . . ; -. • • • . WI • • • .. • • . • . • • • . • • •• •• • • • . • •• . • .. • • . . •f • • . • . • . • . . • • . . . • • • r. . I • • • - - I • . • . • . • • • • . SECTION 11: Subsection 18.810.080.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: A. Dedication Requirements. 1. Where a proposed park, playground or other public use shown in a development plan adopted by the City is located in whole or in part in a subdivision, the Commission may require the dedication or reservation of such area within the subdivision, p grata the >:::::>:::: <:: : r orti ;::>:::: ;> fif e<im act.. f teserva an r Ted eaiuo: .::1 .ro. 1 .. ..o .. .z toxiatIo... . .. 2. Where considered desirable by the Commission in accordance with adopted comprehensive plan policies, and where a development plan of the City does not indicate proposed public use areas, the Commission may require the dedication or reservation of areas within the subdivision or sites of a character, extent and location suitable for the development of parks 3r:and other public use, 1<;_<::>::t n »: .gni: 'r �?:.c��c�ed thatem�.;:.; a�!: �;ec1.;�at� t�.;:.;� g ��.;:� .::.;;;�?:::�:: to'the `'a-t t esubdivrsion:on_the:: ark:: . stem SECTION 12: Subsections 18.810.110.A. and B. of the Tigard Community Development Code are amended to read as follows: A. Bikeway extension. Developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through dedication of easements or. • rights-of-way, provided�>suc <dedicationis directly<:related:to a:nd::roug hly • • B. Cost of construction. Development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions and other . • developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of•bikeway improvement z11 an amount rou hl, ro `410. al.>to the tm .actof thedevelo: rnerit< ........................... - Page 6 • DRAFT SECTION 13: The Tigard Community Development Code is amended by adding a new subsection 18.810.020.E. to read as follows: Except provided m Section 18 810•••••••••O30S, as used in this ehapter,the term"stret ' ha1L mean 4tpub1u streets"un'ess an adjustment et Suott 18 810 020 D is allowed • gfnacm\90024\codeamend.rd1(6/4/99) • • • • • • • •• • • Page 7 0 • • EXHIBIT B Agenda Item: s. L . Hearing Date: July 19. 1999 , ,,,y,„.,.. 4 ";,,,,„,..VkSZ.1*- '' '''''".'14� w „tom p ,` � r M ommu De:- _` If i*ILE.1.--4:0,„"%za., y,,z,"0:04*-44,1V1314s.riM:Vr:,.*Av.44,1-eliaz*,,P,..W.. IL w HE C F GARD REON I G, ,i'z' SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: CLARIFYING AMENDMENTS RELATING TO FINAL DECISIONS, EFFECTIVE DATES. APPEAL REQUIREMENTS. DEVELOPMENT CONFORMANCE, STANDARDS APPLICABILITY. AND DEDICATION AND IMPROVEMENTS REQUIREMENTS. CASE: Zone Ordinance Amendment ZOA 1999-00002 PROPOSAL: The City of Tigard proposes clarification amendments to the Tigard Community Development Code language in Sections 18.340.020.G., 18.390.040.F., 18.390.040.G.2:c., .18.390.040.H., 18.390.050.G., 18.390.080.A.1.d., 18.620.010.B., 18.810.020.A., 18.810.020.E., 18.810.030.A., 18.810.070.A., 18.810.080.A. and 18.810.110.A. & B. to. better define Final Decisions, Effective Dates, Appeal Requirements, Development Conformance, Standards Applicability, and Dedication and Improvements Requirements. APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER: N/A 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 ZONING DESIGNATION: N/A LOCATION: Citywide APPLICABLE . REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 3 and 11; Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1.a., 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 7 and 8; and Community Development Code Sections 18.380.020 and 18.390.060.G. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION o vF r F r,„ n or s -h`" %a�< z.., S > roo o danc.3 e±e wn zx ,h r " e a ate. ? Gehl lsslon I d � o ped. ur� i�en l 1I S co eu.ls ill om:t�o rse ailffecteh3e .erY' �d 4 e far e o . tae It ! ere' _ eiio n e s APP OVL' ub ec ' o� � , owing ommej o ed Jcond - vat 5 ` ea• el ppro ;1,71. "46,'. P, sl t • . % ` *$ .°,x.t . t T .crn : a 7/19/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 1 of 3 ZOA 1999-00002/CLARIFYING CODE AMENDMENTS S • SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION City Staff has been working with the City Attorney's office to clarify ambiguities in Development Code language relating to public improvements, effective dates and final decisions. It clarifies that Type II procedures concludes with appeal to the Hearings Officer as was intended and written originally. Amendments to improvement requirements and relative to dedication provide for greater assurance of compliance with Dolan. Ordinance language as drafted by the City Attorney's office is attached. Additions are redlined and deletions shown by strikeout. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The relevant criteria in this case are Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 3 and 11; Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.'1.a., 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 7 and 8; and Community Development Code Chapter 18.390. The proposal is consistent with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals based on the following findings: 1. Goal 1, Citizen Involvement, is met because the City has followed its adopted citizen involvement program which involved review by its Citizen Involvement Team structure, and public hearings as listed above. The City's Citizen Involvement Policies in the Comprehensive Plan have been acknowledged to be in compliance with Goal 1. Notice for all hearings was provided in the Tigard Times which summarized and outlined the amendments being made to existing code provisions and was done so for each public hearing. Copies of the ordinance drafts have been available at least seven days prior to the hearings which follows Community Development Code Procedure. 2. Goal 2, Land Use Planning, is met because the City applied all relevant Statewide Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan Policies and Community Development Code requirements in review of this proposal. 3. Goal 3, Natural Features and Open Space are met because these.policies call for development control of floodplains and greenway areas and these provisions provide a tool consistent with recent case law to assess the impact and need for. improvements, reservations and dedication that is roughly proportional to the impact of the development. 4. Goal 11, Public Facilities and Services and Goal 12 Transportation, are met because the proposed measures assist in implementing the provision of public facilities and services, and transportation facilities in a more timely, orderly and efficient manner to provide better defined levels of service improvements consistent to the impacts of those developments. 7/19/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 2 of 3 ZOA 1999-00002/CLARIFYING CODE AMENDMENTS • The proposal is consistent with the City's acknowledged Comprehensive Plan based on the following findings: 1. Policies 1.1.1.a. and c. are satisfied because the proposed code changes are consistent with Statewide Planning Goals as indicated above and the changes help to keep the development code current with local needs and recent case law. 2. Policies 2.1.1 and 2.1.3 are satisfied because the proposal has been reviewed at public hearings and through the City's Public Involvement process. 3. The proposed changes are consistent with the provisions of Comprehensive Plan Policies 7, Public Facilities and Services and 8, Transportation which call for ensuring that as a.precondition to development, developments coincide with the availability of adequate services and that development is to provide streets and right-of-way consistent with City standards. The proposed changes clarify ambiguities in existing code language that will help to assure compliance with Dolan. 4. Community Development Code Section 18.390.060.G. which establishes procedures for legislative code changes is satisfied according to the above findings. No other applicable Metro, federal or state regulations apply. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Engineering Department, Police Department, and Building Division have reviewed the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS GTE, NW Natural Gas Co., Cablevision, PGE, Metro Area Communications, US West Communications, Tri-Met Transit Development, Washington County Dept. of Land Use & Transportation, Metro Area Boundary Commission, Oregon DLCD, ODOT and members of the Citizen Involvement Teams have all had the opportunity to review the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. No other comments have been received. dip Allk• . _ t.C.rf�_ 6/30/99 PREPARED BY: Richard Bew: V DATE Planning Ma ager 7/19/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 3 of 3 ZOA 1999-00002/CLARIFYING CODE AMENDMENTS Va141d, 'iY A �. �� � � y.� h >^ l w tl� � '�' �'ta- //BnHII'iNl�� I 'r; p\ '.. -xr �-��Se"- xer`as 3uk� °��� a� TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION City of Tigard JULY 19, 1999 shaBetter Darlopment TIGARD CIVIC CENTER 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN TASK FORCE MEETING, 6:00— 8:00 P.M. RED ROCK CREEK CONFERENCE ROOM 8:00 P.M. — REGULAR MEETING _ TOWN HALL 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS 4. APPROVE MINUTES • 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA) 1999-00001 TEMPORARY SIGN RETRIEVAL POLICY PROPOSAL: The zoning ordinance amendment would amend the Community Development Code (Section 18.780.120(C)) and Municipal Code (Section 2.52.010) to declare signs in the public right-of-way as abandoned property and establish a retrieval fee for sign owners. ZONING DESIGNATION: N/A. LOCATION: Citywide. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2, Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1 a., 2.1.1, 2.1.3, Community Development Code 18.380.020, 18.390.060(G) and 18.780.120(C), Municipal Code 2.52.010. 5.2 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA) 1999-00002 TITLE 18 LANGUAGE CLARIFICATION TO CHAPTERS 18.340, 18.390, 18.620, 18.810 The City of Tigard proposes to amend the Tigard Community Development Code Chapter 18 to clarify existing code language relating to Final Decisions, Effective Dates, Appeal Requirements, Development Conformance, Standards Applicability, and Dedication and Improvements Requirements in Sections 18.340.020.G., 18.390.040.F., 18.390.040.G.2.c., 18.390.040.H., 18.390.050.G., 18.390.080.A.1.d., 18.620.010.B., 18.810.020.A., 18.810.020.E., 18.810.030.A., 18.810.070.A., 18.810.0.80.A. and 18.810.110.A. & B. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2 and 11; Tigard • Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1.a., 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 7 and 8; and Community Development Code Sections 18.380.020 and 18.390.060.G. 6. OTHER BUSINESS 7. ADJOURNMENT • • • Agenda Item: s'Z Hearing Date: July 19. 1999 &s: .-iu f,�.•;d�;.a;. -,:2�::.. r ..;Y_ >Y,,. g' .is<' �.:. S;_:i� ,'.�,'.",+t �,�'Fy.'t�hi,.:..n.•-✓%"�;; �_P F+��,,.>�.Ss..�:.� > .,�. �':L"'s-•""•�°�t -sa' ��'- 'JAI' r � £ STAFFIREPORT TO THE r ;:"A 41 j III �'.:�, *� .,`�- as.<,ru'�_ .��� saS',.�` as . ,a -� -a ; P.,,LANNING4COMMISSION CITY OF TIGARD 4 ..rd a ,<Community:1Deve'lopment 9FOR=TNEtiCITY OFkTIGARD pingATetter'Community tail. SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY • FILE NAME: CLARIFYING AMENDMENTS RELATING TO FINAL DECISIONS, EFFECTIVE DATES. APPEAL REQUIREMENTS, DEVELOPMENT CONFORMANCE, STANDARDS APPLICABILITY, AND DEDICATION AND IMPROVEMENTS REQUIREMENTS. CASE: Zone Ordinance Amendment ZOA 1999-00002 PROPOSAL: The City of Tigard proposes clarification amendments to the Tigard Community Development Code language in Sections 18.340.020.G., 18.390.040.F., 18.390.040.G.2.c., 18.390.040.H., 18.390.050.G., 18.390.080.A.1.d., 18.620.010.B., 18.810.020.A., 18.810.020:E., 18.810.030.A., 18.810.070.A., 18.810.080.A. and 18.810.110.A. & B. to better define Final Decisions, Effective Dates, Appeal Requirements, Development Conformance, Standards Applicability, and Dedication and Improvements Requirements. APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER: N/A 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 ZONING DESIGNATION: N/A LOCATION: Citywide APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 3 and 11; Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1.a., 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 7 and 8; and Community Development Code Sections 18.380.020 and 18.390.060.G. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION • (Staff Atet som- rn e;.,n '". th" a�;.t.s-.:",tt%e P lan-nq`i n g-„s :�., -,'r•';';''' ��-- :. -� .�,3' a,T.'�,'''�S_ - :m ��.,tJ`� ,=�,�:f -Commiaswn find .chat ;;the ,proposed ordinance: ,amendmentstwillnot adverseIy affect the-:health, safety and:welfare=ofahe wCit OTF ecefoce=v ;.>.;.,:x: sv>'�'-r;, "s,,r.,F,.',r y:, <.._.,, - <ps.�: r;�, 9,'.,r 5>•' �r .O'f <. a�;�•a� � ,F �, -.,����.� ^z' F;�Y=`F�n-;z:r<«-;"�;�'-':e�;'`:�:.s�`', c..'c....dab. .1.. ,,:."�"�-<�z._�;;;«::;I�.::�.. " 8y.+,:..r<.*.:,a .�.�, �i�'�" s 'staff,recommends:APP.ROYAL;i-subject<:to:�the,:followmg recommende:d,'conditionsi of- ,£ v/"s % .;J Z, ,Y v H .,8'"tx &.%?' :' '9 +,.�r-..<'�,$""�-;. .,�+��r> 4 °s- :�•,-�,,,b, ;.�.i�s:e:;l,s ><.. ,,e'F. .. .„.,...;"s°;u, ",.. ,>-"'.^n;.,..>.,. .,,� 't. .,,. . .. ..�.,y6v,;�;�'��.,.xF._<.,.,,, ,.._s..,.. -. „a;.x&>.G .s..sra. 7/19/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 1 of 3 ZOA 1999-00002/CLARIFYING CODE AMENDMENTS • • SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION City Staff has been working with the City Attorney's office to clarify ambiguities in Development Code language relating to public improvements, effective dates and final decisions. It clarifies that Type II procedures concludes with appeal to the Hearings Officer as was intended and written originally. Amendments to improvement requirements and relative to dedication provide for greater assurance of compliance with Dolan. Ordinance language as drafted by the City Attorney's office is attached. Additions are redlined and deletions shown by strikeout. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The relevant criteria in this case are Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2,' 3 and 11; Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1.a., 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 7 and 8; and Community Development Code Chapter 18.390. The proposal is consistent with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals based on the following findings: 1. Goal 1, Citizen Involvement, is met because the City has followed its adopted citizen involvement program which involved review by its Citizen Involvement Team structure, and public hearings as listed above. The City's Citizen Involvement Policies in the Comprehensive Plan have been acknowledged to be in compliance with Goal 1. Notice for all hearings was provided in the Tigard Times which summarized and outlined the amendments being made to existing code provisions and was done so for each public hearing. Copies of the ordinance drafts have been available at least seven days prior to the hearings which follows Community Development Code Procedure. 2. Goal 2, Land Use Planning, is met because the City applied all relevant Statewide Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan Policies and Community Development Code requirements in review of this proposal. 3. Goal 3, Natural Features and Open Space are met because these policies call for development control of floodplains and greenway areas and these provisions provide a tool consistent with recent case law to assess the impact and need for improvements, reservations and dedication that is roughly proportional to the impact of the development. 4. Goal 11, Public Facilities and Services and Goal 12 Transportation, are met because the proposed measures assist in implementing the provision of public facilities and services, and transportation facilities in a more timely, orderly and efficient manner to provide better defined levels of service improvements consistent to the impacts of those developments. 7/19/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 2 of 3 ZOA 1999-00002/CLARIFYING CODE AMENDMENTS i • • The proposal is consistent with the City's acknowledged Comprehensive Plan based on the following findings: 1. Policies 1.1.1.a. and c. are satisfied because the proposed code changes are consistent with Statewide Planning Goals as indicated above and the changes help to keep the development code current with local needs and recent case law. 2. Policies 2.1.1 and 2.1.3 are satisfied because the proposal has been reviewed at public hearings and through the City's Public Involvement process. 3. The proposed changes are consistent with the provisions of Comprehensive Plan Policies 7, Public Facilities and Services and 8, Transportation which call for ensuring that as a precondition to development, developments coincide with the availability of adequate services and that development is to provide streets and right-of-way • consistent with City standards. The proposed changes clarify ambiguities in existing code language that will help to assure compliance with Dolan. 4. Community Development Code Section 18.390.060.G. which establishes procedures for legislative code changes is satisfied according to the above findings. No other applicable Metro, federal or state regulations apply. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Engineering Department, Police Department, and Building Division have reviewed the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS GTE, NW Natural Gas Co., Cablevision, PGE, Metro Area Communications, US West Communications, Tri-Met Transit Development, Washington County.Dept. of Land Use & Transportation, Metro Area Boundary Commission, Oregon DLCD, ODOT and members of the Citizen Involvement Teams have all had the opportunity to review the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. No other comments have been received. 411Pir t-4.4 /. ��_rs 6/30/99 PREPARED BY: Richard Bew: DATE Planning Ma ager 7/19/99 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 3 of 3 ZOA 1999-00002/CLARIFYING CODE AMENDMENTS • • • DRAFT • TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE PROPOSED REVISIONS REDLINE/STRIKEOUT VERSION • SECTION 1: Subsection 18.340.020.G. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: G. Final decision/effective date. The decision of the City Council on an appeal of a Director Interpretation shall be final nd... e...ff.:.ectiv:. . when <ot of he dec so :it-is mailed to the applicant, prow ded • however that if:the::: p. 1ica t::kat PitootoriotOktitlfirmtnoitg the de ision i '>final nd ffect e v ri riad The decision • • . . . . . . . • • .. . • • 111/ . Jurisdiction SECTION 2: Subsection 18.390.040.F. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: F. Final decision and effective date. A Type II Administrative Decision is • final for purposes of appeal when notice the' ecisior it-is mailed. A Type II Administrative Decision t eco es ineffective on the day after the appeal period expires, 4.6.160:6.11W604L4.1ifIga. If an appeal is filed the zi>zsxti sskt e p:alp rind has expired, the Type II Administrative • •ecisio becort•• effective on dismissal o `th e appe t, SECTION 3: Subsection 18.390.040.G.2.c. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: • c. Appeal procedures. Type III notice and hearing procedures shall be used for all Type II Administrative Appeals, as provided in Sections 18.390.050 • C - GF. SECTION 4: Subsection 18.390.040.H. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: • H. Final decision and effective date. The decision of the Hearings Officer with regard-to-any-Or appeal of a Type II decision is the final i ' dec i n of the o t e i C t ad€€isftraa' >::>,d>e ec < >::<:::>:,::<.: ::_ ; : < ><>::;.,.. City:...:::::::::::::.:::::.....an.:::;:.ff.:.::ttve.z�n.the day;�n©fce:9f the decis on s t a led .• • . ' - : • . . . .. .. • . . . . • . . . -'• - • O. ' • Page 1 • H .. • S . DRAFT • • • • • VII I • . V1Pwn 2 V. • • 1111 • I, V • • • • • appeal-is-resolv & SECTION 5: Subsection 18.390.050.G. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: G. Final decision Final decision_ effective date and appeal: The decision of the R:evievrAttthoritrcrtranPI4MWCafdiiihiiikiflffiiiiggtdai • • In*Type Ill appeal 0654 is final for purposes of appeal on the date gotitoottlie::.tigtittui4 it-is mailed. Afty.party*.ttavttatiditik NotimpofigotwitittWbitt.dtorwithitclOiii."60444y.faiii4 44ttotimioftoi40040::11:41)4ito&iiii:331*:110:tkig:04401:::0411::U • 100:10400*WiliW • •. iifb0d4rmiit$040.tisAMagg.3)$aCiZa-ettioNtow.oditt.0.0 APPOA • • • I .• • • • , " - • • • •• • • • • • •2• . • • • • • • • • • • • • • I. Typ .i:fft appeal i the final decision ofthe City and is final"•••and ift04.0.:0:9.0::::$.1***A9400:igifithOgiggoopu:i.04i1.40 • SECTION 6: Subsection 18.390.080.A.1.d. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: • • • d. "Effective date" means the date on which a particular action or decision may be undertaken or otherwise implemented. For 00.0.0.11. $119:ilmiwypppw::fgrm.pk4IIPPAt:PK:49KgAIY:iPPPOCIL • kciVaPERfflOvutIggfogtm44-mwill:::.40.0011klicthoiftyiotoi the appeal period expires Uan appeal is dismissed atei the appa1 KeitAtibaivoitogi:died. 610.16.6.41aWiiii1igiaji6f ottiie appeal • becomes effective at Oig:::PIORKPPOIdomW412:::fii14:401.400&Pi7 the City(those that are not subject to any further appeal or review within the City)arc nomtally effective when they become final . . . • • • • •, • • • • V ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • V IV • I • • • • ••■• • • • afterthe-appeal-is-resolvech Page 2 • • • • . DRAFT ' SECTION 7: Subsection 18.620.010.B. of the Tigard Community Development Code is • amended to read as follows: B. Development conformance. All new developments, including remodeling and renovation projects resulting in sesothet(aion-single family ....:....:........::::.. residential use, are expected to contribute to the character and quality of the area In addition to meeting the design standards described #t1 S ; i ater below and other development standards required by the • on Development and Building Codes, such developments will be ..:.......:..::..:...... required to: • Dedicate and improve public streets, t.v.O.Migivxtenttriat such dedication. d'iel5::>::>::>:::::>:>::: ::p :�::::: : :.keIafEd;and;�flclgtly • r Connect to public facilities such as sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage; and • 3. • Participate in funding future transportation and R. Ni public improvement projects in tri within-the Tigard Triangle, rov ded that the re uirement tQ axtici at s d re tl.'>related and rou SECTION 8: Subsection 18.810.020.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: A. When standards apply. Unless otherwise provided, the-standard specifications-for-construction, reconstruction or repair of streets, sidewalks, curbs, and other public improvements within-the-City-shall occur in accordance with the standards of this title. No development may occur d no nd use app cation ay b pprp d unless the public facilities related to development comply with the public facility requirements established section ed in this s sect on axdagaatepatc£aciiftgsiria'ralblo. oire� .�:>:: � ��:>=>::::>�:>;::>:: �<:>:<<:::>:< :::;:::;<:.: : :::<><::: > �:::::<: ;: =:::: : d to dedicate lartd and build require pubbe:::::. imp.d ements gnly yhen the egoired exaction directly elated c and• rou hl°:`'<propottio al€to<the im act of d e dev.::el:opmenty • SECTION 9: Subsection 18.810.030.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: A. Improvements. 1. No development shall occur unless the development has frontage or • Page 3 DRAFT approved access to a public street. development Sha11 o ui5unless streets than the eiev opment efsc#airds al``Ns>c1#a° r<; 3 ..;;;..;;p�t1t tz s�. 1!our unless olio streets adJ�eent to the fleet mei t::: xee�460: tandar4s thi :: :h...:.ter,pr...vt.e :.:: ...,;>;:.:.<; r.: .::::::.::.*.::: :-;0912.0 nt may.he appro rec ir tk04.0cgotAttc040.moOt • the st ndard but half street tmprovements meetng the s anhr s ofth s tle-arc w.nstn d adjacent le the deygl4ptnent.; 4. Any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall . . .' .. . . ' . . this-,code eet t e sta t ar s 7 'aiu:`:`<`?` `:`::`:`:":"<::` : .....�:�kt� .:.fit:. 5 apt �:>::: ::: :<:> :::::>:::>�: ::>:; � ::::::::::>::::::>: ; ::: _::>>:::::> : . :; :::<, :. heitY could and would otltert?v�se require theappiicant tcz provide stret pro enen ;the City Engineer may accept a future improvements guarantee in lieu of street improvements if one or • more of the following conditions exist: a. A partial improvement is not feasible due to the inability to achieve property design standards; b. A partial improvement may create a potential safety hazard to motorists or pedestrians; c. Due to the nature of existing development on adjacent properties it is unlikely that street improvements would be extended in the foreseeable future and the improvement associated with the project under review does not, by itself, provide a significant improvement to street safety or capacity; d. The improvement would be in conflict with an adopted capital improvement plan; e. The improvement is associated with an approved land • •• partition on property zoned residential and the proposed land partition does not create any new streets; or • f. Additional planning work is required to define the appropriate design standards for the street and the • application is for a project which would contribute only a • Page 4 • • • DRAFT minor portion of the anticipated future traffic on the street. 6. 'hesta idar ls: i :th .. ::;n� - : :::$ :::. ' aid:::...:: :. o.. <:.:::: '�.::':' ter:�;:;e�r��e::the�ta.�ald:` .eeti°te�t�c��ns ...:::Y:<:iY.:iii:{:::j ii•}:';•ii:4:'::i:.:6:�:iry:.iii:C::ti::v':::i:i':?i::.5i;y':i iii::i:::ii::i'!i:::i'.:i'i::i'.::�:i'i:i'.::.::ii'.:i::::ii::: ad6::ted "'iii °i-. n aneec ursuaitt::.,. ...: .. :' :: : �::. :. :: ::::: • 7. • • • • .• •' • • • • • . ' • • • . . , • ► . • • • .. .. • • • • . . . . . . . . • •• • • • • • • . . .. r• • • • • • • • • • . • • - • • • • • • • • • • • :::i::::>i:::iPl? : vat tttor tv may apprd e a:446A§Ats to the sta.n.. .6 o th:k l apte Hgomp.iance It i da tig rg6ldres .� i::: 4ii:.;::';:::� s ; ::::xn. .:::;:`::;,. a. verse impact on natural featuresugh a: u edan:4: tee slepes, .. ........... ore : ttzi` mature:::.:..:.::.:::,.:::: :.:. :::... .....:: ...:::.:.;.;'.:: .»'....:::::.::: .;:..;:;:.::.;.:<_;::;;:. : ::: g<:::.:i:::ii<> trees Tlae ppr�ay aut 0..0 stay sc sppresve :;.:::. . :isi:<;';::::. i:. .::.::i':;:... ;:::.i:.i:: :..;:.�.:.;::.>:. i a01u6t rents 9>t00 44. O th standar$.014 d haue an-slxbstanti11410 Asti. :_... _l pment or would preclpde development an the property uwlto,:.::;.::ho:;developn ent,::prapt Seed,:i In approving an 40600 t.x,.wpliun to the standards, the approval authority shall determine .. . . . . .. • tilt • • standards bal ace the h;enefit of the adjustment.with.the unpact©n • the a lie, i:;;•::>:::<<:>:::;:,::::> b ... r terestirg ogigg <":::_t::<::<.;;::::::»::>> ;:::>::_:>::::: ..�:::.:P..�: :: ; �i?! <�Ythestandard�. In evaluating the publie benefits t t t tl pt E t ;e t, the approval authority shall consider the criteria listed in Section 18.810.030.E.1 ad u tment to the standards may not be.granted rf the adjustment SECTION 10: Subsection 18.810.070.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: A. Sidewalks ndustr al street `i hall have: i "1 ° me`:tin'°:_.. • ...:;.....dords along one side ofthe street Ali other streets shall have s'd�ual ,.'i:.:;. :: :.,>':::,:.:::;.;:.;:;:.::»<; :::::;.>:. :; :::::: ::i<::i.::;: ;, :i: : i:::;><>:: : < gt e;. ks meeting City standards along both sides ofthe street:.:;,,t: �:::::i::::+'.:.�:.�::::.�:::::.:::::::::ii:�:v:.:.ii:.:iiii::::.�i}ii}iii:.:.:4...:•i%3i'i::n:..4.:::::::.::v::::::hii}::::::.::'.i}iii::.ii'6•+i•iiii:4:,i::..r:::.:':;:::::::.�::.: s de adjoining the development,even Xf e sidew lk exists of the ot1 std± of.the3street»': •• • • • • • • •.' • • - . • • • • • . • . . - • - . '• - . • . . • 1. On both sides of arterial and collector streets to be built at the time 2. On both sides of all other st►ects and in pcth stria►'i e ast,m nib and Page 5 I DRAFT • . . -• -• • •� . •A • • • • • 1 • • • • 1 1 . • : . •• •• • • •• • . • • • • • • • •• • • ••• . • •• • • • • • , • 1 •, and • 3. Oil one side.of any indasti gal st1 at to be construtA,d at the tilac of • • . '. • . I • . • • II 1 • . •• . SECTION 11: Subsection 18.810.080.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: • A. Dedication Requirements. 1. Where a proposed park, playground or other public use shown in a development plan adopted by the City is located in whole or in part in a subdivision, the Commission may require the dedication or reservation of such area within the subdivision,;:provietha: the . .. ;.�;:;...;:o? ;::.::1.;;.�::d cafiion,zs roughly proportional o the impact of 2. . Where considered desirable by the Commission in accordance with adopted comprehensive plan policies, and where a development • plan of the City does not indicate proposed public use areas, the Commission may require the dedication or reservation of areas within the subdivision or sites of a character, extent and location suitable for the development of parks or aiid other public use, re vtded>;that the>reservatl:on> r tr the ripact t the su divtsi n n:the park ::.steal SECTION 12: Subsections 18.810.110.A. and B. of the Tigard Community Development • Code are amended to read as follows: A. Bikeway extension, Developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through dedication of easements or rights-of-way, provided sucl de ication s directly:related?ato and rt ughly: -tgoio..g r!.......fl he impact,.of the development„ B. Cost of construction. Development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvement z a_n; :.1 ount:roug.::.:.y proport onal to the impactof the tevefoptr ent< Page 6 • • • • DRAFT SECTION 13: The Tigard Community Development Code is amended by adding a new subsection 18.810.020.E. to read as follows: Exc p as pray ded in Section.;18 81 i 030Sx as used in this chapter,the tezzx :s r �E.s s a n?ear »:: :::.b1to:stree s unl. s n:> usfim t>un er OtiOi:.:>:1::.;::.8 :: 0120 D:Is;allowedI gff\acm\90024\codeamend.rd1(6/4/99) • • • • • • • • • Page 7 . COMMUNITY Notice Ntvvri.krian , "v.,. Legal • • . . , • • . .. TT 9 4 4 5 . •.:::.. • , P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 . . BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 _ . .. .: . . . . • Legal Notice Advertising • •:, ,. • El Tearsheet Notice f1:-.-'e-iti*.iF4;k-,t-oeL§',):::„::.;,:fr t:4,6,.?.:11,ii:ti,,; a.:". ...-„A7.7.••;4,ii;,..;;;;:l f,;;,-;,1•::....',^:::?;,,,,,:--,f,':. ,;',,5.:' 'City of Tigard/Planning ATI_Mdlkii,Wing_*41,400MSiciereOtifibblialleifingiNytthellifird .1-10 - :. •;•ning tbriaMissiori.:ORMondniljnIk119,4 999;'-'at 7:30,rilVgqridAbil/ 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • 0 Duplicate Affidavit 1.1,G Tigard'citi:Oiiineir Ori Tiiiiitay",qiiiiiit'401999$11 7:30kWbOthlt• . . °Tigard,Oregon 97223 ;(xi theTigard:Civic Cen ter. Town::Hall;41.31 25 SW;Halli•BlVd1,1Tigard • '',:Oregon;.The;:c9tilin4kidn's,k1fieW is for the purPosei„ofirnalcingialrecom '• *Accounts Payable .1;ntepciatipn.4010,43W,9.uPP.PiPlktheire44,est:iThKiiY,CounciliNVill,also•: li.COndpct.,03,e4nAg:on this t.e4it.es,t prici.tdfm*.ingidecisiOn.14),? • • 1:;.Boh public'bral and wriitientes`timoiv;=iai&ited t-ie".b:ib'lic'' Iea''*nzsthiS,Mattei:Will he cOc4tairdccrd4 .v6iittiilesdi,ccap9.Z.1. .. ?!.18,12:0;4t,ti6fTiiiaso'muiii5fp4t 00 r-414 iiieVe1.31.iiVrtile's and AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ''?procaltireS:oethe;;Iiiii4•Plannini:COgOission and Tigard City-CoUnCie * ) • .respeeliyely,.T;i1nr&toljdise!an',issi.ieiri-Iffeigaii`;`Ot bY4leffer iTs(iiiie gat' STATE OF'OREGON, ss. ti•prior to:thelolOs`e.':of tliejhearings on the request/in.failGe-TO.Pialigsfaie-?! COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) •),,imentslOileViden4,Wtsufile-ientitO alloW4lie:beatirigiatithOlitPlari,WpoitiMitj%,' 3a toiisp,010 fii:e.,:.iSstioiiii:od4 enialip-ealto the Land Vsb-B4Oargif WiY41 . 1, Kathy Snyder :4peals:brithat.i4ne.:".Piirtheiinforniation may be obtained from the Plan,. being first duly sworn, depose and say that I amTtheiAadivectlisiTngimes _ ningiDivisiclat1.3125,SW.Haltplyd2;,:tiateOreg6ii 9713'Or b icalIR Director, or his principal . , inge(6300 71 A rept,•,..kfl,r,4•11t..• : ",11.:..,:...:.. I clerk, oftheas1 gard— liA _ a newspaper of general circulation n, —iTIPIStele4144&61t:;1.1.11tr,kok't.0 :::1 '•;. .`•,. ..1;A 1;1..1 defined in ORS 1931.0thlue • and 193.020; published at . 1 ihgard ...1'.05•);Z.,0$E.0.4DI,1,AKE.AMENDMENT[i•;:-.4]•1901.;o4i;),0•2 .) aforesaid county and state, that the 0 2 ziThe City 4igacd:Yirop,,Osie„S4o 41 ine'A'fhti)T,igar4.,c'644,44 ikPl.:9,1:4;i: Zone Ordinanrp 1999-00 n .Iiierit,c.94 ch4p*ip 44ciarifyi existing ioil4kgiiageittlating'qFinal4 Decisions4ffeetge-pates';TAppeal,Requireinents,Development ConfOr;.. a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was psuccessive u b I i e d in and the ed .pance,;Stand.ard8APpliOahility, andMediCation,.and:JmproYementsRe..:; entire issue of said newspaper for nuc c iquirements iriiSeetiMiiiqs.'340:020-.'Gll&390 0:4Or:Pi,"1 , 830 040 G'2 consecutive in he following issues: 1181390.040.11,';'''.1& 9Qi050:Gc.1,q813§0!.680:-A.ve,'1$('62010 IV:l'il..-`, 11 84'81 0:02 0,.WC'Al.8A-2810:'()20:E:•';'-1 8.810:, '..6 3°TA..9.!l8V81V.070X3/1 . . .„ . July 8 , 1999 11 8.8 1 008 OA&and, I 8 I.10:1 113:AA4c;13:4PPLICABEVREVIEW.i! ICRITg.RIA::•itateW,i4.,pla'nning Qoals:1;,;i2iinclif.f;Tigard Coniiirelierii .. 1Sh;c Plan Policie.s..i xi.4.;-,2,1,.I';•:.2,:,t,i3f 7 and 8;:and_C9,iarnimity•Develop4i. ' 40 . Yal.kA6 ,----ii-c6cLa— !mein Code SectionsA8j380.0204nd'18.390.060.G6W:,i ilia]::itil..,,V..iij ok'ri" irr9,1:45.'r'-'Nbigli iiitY S',4.09,9::'';'.'; 't • ,51`t..",:'' . .-1 .•.C.• .• . . ',•,,. ..., .7.62.4.5.;.: -6! '.1f=.ol'' ' 441.1-1,-,:'13. ti. 1 y,19 9.9 Subscribed and sworn t before me thiTh clay (If ,Tu 6tio - 6 ..4„..,,:c7:- EGON • 0 062071 , NoVylu'Iplic for Oregon ■ii'li COMMISSION N . 2001 My Commission Expires: AFFIDAVIT . . ROCEpl CAIBILL3iitESS : . - MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 16. .c. . , • • NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMMNDMENT This form must be received by DLCD at least 45 days prior to the final he n ORS 197.610 and OAR Chapter 660, Division 18 0 O y. See reverse side for submittal requirements Jurisdiction City of Tigard Date of Final Hearing August 10. 1999 Local File #ZOA 1999-00002 Has this proposal been previously submitted to DLCD?_Yes XNo Date Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment _ Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment X Land Use Regulation Amendment _ Zoning Map Amendment New Land Use Regulation Briefly summarize the proposal. Do not use technical terms. Do not write "See Attached." A zoning ordinance amendment clarifying Community Development Code language relatively to final decisions/effective date and appeal requirements. development conformance, standard applicability, improvements, sidewalks and dedications. Plan Map Change From N/A to N/A Zone Map Change From N/A to N/A Location: Citywide Acres Involved: N/A Specified change in Density: Current Density N/A Proposed Density N/A Applicable Goals: 1 & 11 Is an Exception proposed?_ Yes X No Affected State or Federal Agencies, Local Governments or Special Districts: L.C.D.C. and Metro Local Contact: Richard Bewersdorff Phone: 503-639-4171 Address: 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard: OR 97223 DLCD File# Date Rec'd #Days Notice • • SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS • •� ORS 197.610 and OAR Chapter 660, Division 18 1. Send this Form and Two (2) Copies of the Proposed Amendment to: Department of Land Conservation and Development 635 Capital Street NE, Suite 150 Salem, Oregon 97301-2540 COPY TO: Metro Land Use as Planning 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland, OR 97232-2736 ODOT- Region 1, District 2-A Jane Estes, Permit Specialist 5440 SW Westgate Drive, Suite 3 Portland, OR 97221-2414 2. Unless exempt by ORS 197.610 (2), proposed amendments must be received at the Salem DLCD office at least 45 days before thefinal hearing on the proposal. 3. Submittal of proposed amendments shall include the text of the amendment and any other information the local government believes is necessary to advise DLCD of the proposal. "Text" means the specific language being added to or deleted from the acknowledged plan or land use regulations. A general description of the proposal is not adequate. 4. Submittal of proposed "map" amendments must include a map of the affected area showing existing and proposed plan and zone designations. The map should be on 8 1/2 by 11 inch paper. A legal description, tax account number, address or general description is not adequate. 5. Submittal of proposed amendments which involve a goal exception must include the proposed language of the exception. If you need more copies of this form, copy it on green paper or call the DLCD office at 503-373-0050. • • TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE PROPOSED REVISIONS REDLINE/STRIKEOUT VERSION SECTION 1: Subsection 18.340.020.G. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: G. Final decision/effective date. The decision of the City Council on an appeal of a Director Interpretation shall be final rfffeetie when:::<:>::;� >>,;;;:: >::;. ��:::>::: >:::n it-is mailed to the applicant,. ro:: ::;$ nvta ,.��the,deo�sis�n provided :..>::>::>::>::>;:::::>: :.>::>:>: ; owever €I at if the a licant is the Direc tiEt ttiOti ouncll • :::i'.i::::i:::1::i:?::i::::i:::i:Y::::i:i .::::i:::::::::::i:::::?i.:::i:i:.. .::� the>decision is:€final:>and:effectl e en a t;:i:1 jurisdiction SECTION 2: Subsection 18.390.040.F. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: F. Final decision and effective date. A Type II Administrative Decision is final for purposes of appeal when not ee o ';thCd0.0 on it-is mailed. A Type II Administrative Decision£ecomes is-effective on the day after the • appeal period expires, OfiAlliiapp*Afgod. If an appeal is filed the • .. . . . • -. • • and di sm s ed after<the ....................................................... ......................................................... PP.:al:p...riod has expired,tlhe Type TI'Adam tratry ecisiarr'becomes effe ti re on dis mss o he a eal> .................................................................... SECTION 3: Subsection 18.390.040.G.2.c. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: c. Appeal procedures. Type III notice and hearing procedures shall be used for all Type II Administrative Appeals, as provided in Sections 18.390.050 C - GF. SECTION 4: Subsection 18.390:040.H. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: • H. Final decision and effective date. The decision of the Hearings Officer with ::r:appeal of a Type II Administrative decision is the final decision of the City azdsfnat n >e#�ecti a an the day.�n©face of the decision s zr a led_ •• • • - • • ' .. .. . • . eV - . • . . • . - .•. • - . . • Page 1 • - •• • • • • • . . . • 011 . . .. .• , • I • • I . • V. • • • • . 11, i • . • • V . • ..' appeal-is-resolved. SECTION 5: Subsection 18.390.050.G. of the Tigard Community Development Code is • amended to read as follows: G. Final decision IP Final decision. effective date and appeal. The decision of the RevierrAtttirritr Itt ....................................................................................................... Type III appeal-:44000 is final for purposes of appeal on the • date notice>ofthc dec sion it-is mailed. ....................................................................................................................................................... r?ayi::appp.4:` ..:; t:.N.t. o to the Cr y C ounc0 by.filitig. ................................................................................................................................................................... Nottee o A aj wtth<ttie>Director;within::10>btisirness>day:scifI - rlare>iYQtce�ote>+�ecis��n:�s:�ailed_:>:> 'he:l�tc�ti : :�1=: 'eal:shall::lre the for >>edifiecl <S c i n< <3 3 0 4,01,)1 Tlzd ::::::::::::::::::::.................................................................................................................. s1�a11.:b�:fo Za.w..esl.:�n::the 400!0.41.1 . . . 1. . . - .. . • . . . . ., • 2. F a Decision ors ppeal The d+edsiop;of e:>Ctty Cour ton any effective o n the date otice of ti e decisio is nma ied ........................................................................................... .....................................::. ...................................................................................................................................... SECTION 6: Subsection 18.390.080.A.1.d. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: d. "Effective date" means the date on which a particular action or decision s may which be undertaken or otherwise implemented. 'or decision .....:.:::.:. .::..:.::.:..::...:.:.::....:.::..:.:.::.1 .:::.�:..:::::.::; �►?�r appea�.by any��ty ct�t�nci) ::fte �f#e�r dismissed after the appeal enod#has ..:: ire , e decisionshat was>the sob.eQt o the ap�:eal ................................................................................................................................................................ bee i es effet true at tl e moment<of dismissal »Phial lecisions< f 4:ii <:>` `:>;<:::>:`,,`:>'<:<. aPP..:.eaLox.rE�€�w :.............:...:.::..::.::::::... wi htrx:..h..:City)..are.n...nnall'` effected,,e:when.:the.:: cori`e`ti a • ." • •, . • • . . -•I •• . • • • . : • . . . . . .. . • , • . 01 . , • • • • • • Page 2 • • • • • SECTION 7: Subsection 18.620.010.B. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: B. Development conformance. All new developments, including remodeling • and renovation projects resulting in s ther than non-single family residential use, are expected to contribute to the character and quality of the area In addition to meeting the design standards described tus ........:::.:. chapter below and other development standards required by the Community Development and Building Codes, s ch developments will be .::....:..:...::..:....:. required to: 1: Dedicate and improve public streets, o the extent t at s ch dedication'at d ztz'rs vement::i$::#ba e ated a:l >:::::::<::: ,:; :::.:.P.::.::..�:.:::::.�:::.�:>.:��':. :.iY.;I�.:: Ed;;and:roug�iy rt z`tzi :it a4: `: a af'tne o4.10P eat': Connect to public facilities such as sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage; and • 3. Participate in funding future transportation and other public improvement projects iii withia the Tigard Triangle, ..t.:..:.h.:.....:.e.:..:..;..:..r..:..;e..:..:.q.."....`.u.:..:..:.:.i..�..`.......>.ri...:..:..:..:.;.e.:...:.n.:..:.:..t.:..:..<:..;.:.;.:.:.;...........: ..........................>......... Tria n....g...le, proAattim to>p ancklp tes .irailyrelated 4nog y . .................................................................................................................. propv rttioal:toariirrt>actoflle'ddvelt«rdet SECTION 8: Subsection 18.810.020.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: A. When standards apply. Unless otherwise provided, the-standard . • specifications-for-construction, reconstruction or repair of streets, sidewalks, curbs, and other public improvements within the City shall occur in accordance with the standards of this title. No development may occur and: o land:`':>,'' ' t`:<>ri;::::>:>: >,:<::>:<:>::::>::<::>:: ,, >», unless the APP:.;; ; ;:.:a.;:. Y:h . P :.: .;;:ed u ess t e public facilities • ....::::. .::.............:....:...... related to development comply with the public facility requirements ....................................................................................................... .............................................................................................. ....... established in this section d<ade"bate: i bl sc facilities:are::available. � . �.s.m b...�r . d.tc�.d�d�catetaad laid>uuild:re`<:ua:red ':'u�� >`..;:;.:::: ,, :>:>: , t g:... p flp o a to h6 impact czf die deuelcrp loo SECTION 9: Subsection 18.810.030.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: • A. Improvements. 1. No development shall occur unless the development has frontage or Page 3 • • • • . . approved access to a public street. • ee1 '' en s a t 8t Gur unless streets;ith�n the des! o :mend mg.0 i e st d rds of igvho `ter 3. • ....................................................................................................................................................... :ti;de.;:e�vpinerl�;sp 1.occur unl ss�.h s r�et�adjacent to Otte ...velop ri ::ft::# et he's:a;'..a � :: ft..:.:.chapter vt�,.4::h r::: � :::�: erYt:::::eel�.�::.:st �r�s� �u�: � ::.�x. :rvd. �we�e f ::4: s.:i::::i::::i::::i::::::iii': that`aid velopm nt it a be ppro ed<f the:ad acent::str et does:nt :::.p..�::e �.:;::::app ' : J. e :;.;.:.�:.�: C feet `he<standai*NifJalf-stree im io emorit» eetingg„>:. m:.:..:.::th..::....:.........:...:...:..:.... ..........::..:...:.....�:. P.::. :.;:. . tints.rn.Eeting;t)�e 4. Any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall . . .' . . . . • . . • . • • . . . ••• this col-Oilitifiggitgligliathagagil • ..........................................................................................................................................:.............. ......................................................................................................................................................... 5. f<tfi:«.:'a '>?" uld:and`wc uld>otherwise reuiire<th..ap<:€can'.,to e cq::.:..:.:........::::::........:.:.:.:..:.....:.:..:..'''''' eq . he appl giant t .......................................................................... ........................................................................... provide`:street'improvem nts the City Engineer may accept a future improvements guarantee in lieu of street improvements if one or more of the following conditions exist: a. A partial improvement is not feasible due to the inability to achieve property design standards; • b. A partial improvement may create a potential safety hazard to motorists or pedestrians; c. Due to the nature of existing development on adjacent properties it is unlikely that street improvements would be extended in the foreseeable future and,the improvement associated with the project under review does not, by itself, provide a significant improvement to street safety or • capacity; • d. The improvement would be in conflict with an adopted capital improvement plan; • e. The improvement is associated with an approved land partition on property zoned residential and the proposed land partition does not create any new streets; or • f. Additional planning work is required to define the appropriate design standards for the street and the • application is for a project which would contribute only a . Page 4 • 0 • . . • . . - • minor portion of the anticipated future traffic on the street. .......................„-„,,:ir.:: (_aisid,••:::::gp,:--ecma... tt....0.11...$ 6 TI.W.otaxi.dat4giq:!i.jt .::::::::::::::::::::Miwi%,1440.:§gaii5.#3:$000:::„..::::::....,:-.......A::: :::::::: .::::::::1:.,...:Efiginooppm.i. ,..m....:::...:....,.....,....,:...: ---..- - 4:40Ptgc.t.PrXJ.1.qN....w:............... ............,.,..... .. . . . 7. , • • • • • , , .,„ • • •, : 9 . • • * .. . I . , , 9 V • • • 1 • . I . • 9 9 I • 9 i • ■ • • • • • • • • • • " V • • • • • • V • • •• I • • • 9 • • V ; , V . - - - • V • V 9 • V • ;i . : ilistandards . . 'ff'''''................"-4: iitiija,iti4r F,PProY,: : : ii6411 T............-66;:#0PL,18#":,,, ' , iwifilitaiittatd§:,:ii*00g:rV!Ii':::::::::::Ni:i;::: f. b4:.:. hdpteritittiitipari:OKirl . yy::::::kiety.:-..46.pt$; ::: Ilitibrat fga-turgip..c.......,:,....„:: :: :: :-..---: • idVq10}:;.f.AP:A9t:iPft111m.,._.tityll.tay.*cx:Appoctyc 40-6xiologimMr : : ' ::::::Ip :::aii-i&::::ifotitYlP tAtkqP: :::-'-:- :,, il:: ::-,,,i:.6i-idfAtdo:iort ..tf1i :::Iiiia iiiott$tinot4,:ittR :1lii.iaii.4itieinv.4-eVotvoCm0.- .. akFhave,- ...,:,stib-stantia.:,... .:.,. . 1d.:.:pitOlu c::: qW,...........----- ------- ,..;,a*?7.,. :: fit ..40Y091NR.::.:Pq:: . :: . dx:In approving an.04..1.gg.n1•••••••••: proposed ....approval authority shall Lltici iiiiii.. •,--__„..... 1. -to the standards, the app LAt.A..p_lull • • II IP • V. ;:::::::::::::; • V• " • ' with the standards 15.014.0.01.-......gi . . 1-'1§ In evaluating the 4,•:••:•g:143.1-4,:•*"..lite,r:eStrepreSgilg -:•]i:-.•:•-•*:,••••••'•:-:•,••:?•••••••:-.,,,:i•:....,•:::::ff--.1.. l authoritY shall it-!y:::le:1•.,,,,......:!, -..„•:,.=::::• : :::::::::::-elli6iiiiiitotq, the approval :....., public benefits 1.11"IP**°°P4m.............."..... 18 8 • listed in Section 10.030.E.1 00• e adjitstlitent adjustment......,.....---.•••••••••••,• ifih •••:•::::-:-::,•:-:::::::::::::::.:::::,::::::::„..::::: ki.4144iikliii.41iii0:$4f.O.t.r .... .. . .... . • o SECTION 10: Subsection 18.81 A of the Tigard Community Development Code is • amended to read an s.0 follows:7 0 .4.:.:.,:.:„::::::::,::::::a::::::::,:::::,:italtdoi.ng:::.:•.f.ty A. mtifidtt$triatItte.o...,. :•:R:::::::::„,•,:,::::;:•„i,:::,,,:,::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;•:-:.:::::::::::::::::::::::::,::::::::.i::::h:••••Thitave All:•41:•-therstreets,s-a..,............:...:...... ••.. ...„,::::::•„:;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::Is,::::::•:,ritietteet::::::::-.: -:::,...••••.:.......:::::„............:•:•,•::::::::::,:.:::::::•:,:,::::::::.•:::::::::::•••,::: :.•:,..':',.f.„411L•fai::0143:::::::ii:::•..g......::::°:::::::6::::::°-::::::!:1::;u:::!:•:1:°:;:]:::':::::,'Ai•:•:••::;••:•6•••:::::::::a*:%•.:::::.iii.,.1-•::::::::,,,::•:,•:11bI161:sH11; :liei14:.'0,':Wq.•:.6e..:..,:..tirr..„.„::„.„:„.....,,,.:. •,,,,ii•A•-•,,,,i•-••,•-:,„...-••:::ertytan...T...q::„,....75..,... :::„.i :: . b/tthd siaewati4”•:tY:Ymt!•!4-.-••::•-•:-.•••••-•••• „:•::::'•:::•,••• •,€:::-:,,,,•:•••6••,•attetnas:siuvw94 . :„..........:-..-:-:••:....... vm:yeepproveck.W.V.I:A :: :i.: ifthe..:ot....opg...e ddve.10.Paten...,,g.l. ..).ii,....,..:„...i: ... t ii6:440w:41k0Xt%$.:::(L:::..:.....-...,-.---..- .... .....- ..... :: fiit6mbpiment;:::gygn:::ta.....„....:.... . - 0404c1i01011).B:t :_-...-.......,......--..,-...-.....-----... al :::. • . • . _ . • • •• • , , . . of the shall be coustraLted, tvcrlaced. . z located-as-follows:- • . • . • • • 19 V• a i • •, • • V • • • • of and 2. On both skits of all other stiets and in pcdvstrian easinentb ana • Page 5 • • • • rights-of-way, except as provided further in this seetim—tcr be• . • . . . .• • • • •. • . • • . • . ••• • • . • •• • • • . • • • . •f • and • 3. O►i o.lc si& of any industrial street to be coast'cn,ted at the time of street f.h,h,l uuivativi►of curb i,at hn,ations- SECTION 11: Subsection 18.810.080.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code is amended to read as follows: A. Dedication Requirements. . 1. Where a proposed park, playground or other public use shown in a development plan adopted by the City is located in whole or in part in a subdivision, the Commission may require the dedication or ............................................ ...................................... .... reservation of such area within the subdivision,prov de t a thie rva i n ar dication.[5 rough y propv #on o fine imp ct ....................................................................................... t#e aubdt ts�n n tt e :a k system ................................................... 2. Where considered desirable by the Commission in accordance with adopted comprehensive plan policies, and where a development plan of the City does not indicate proposed public use areas, the Commission may require the dedication or reservation of areas within the subdivision or sites of a character, extent and location suitable for the development of parks Mind-other public use, • fa tle ':t t tt ei e ery on or t t n . h r n p:::::::::::::::::.�::::::.:::.:::::::::.�.�::.�:::.:�::::.�::.:::.::.::.;;:.:£�ed:<eat::�;.::��.:::oog.::.;:.Y.:p!;:o .;o.; to the<rr :::a.:c >o t SVI ivt ton 4n fi e: ark:::..stet SECTION 12: Subsections 18.810.110.A. and B. of the Tigard Community Development Code are amended to read as follows: • A. Bikeway extension. Developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified • on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through dedication of easements or ri - gh....:..:: ay,:�;o;:;;e;; s :ch ded�catson is directly related io �d roug�l • • pr po�ti©nal to the impactf therlevelopment,. B. Cost of construction. Development permits issued for planned unit • developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions and other - developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be . conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvement id an:.;:::.:::.:: :nt roug....y:.p opotto alto the.impact;of.thedevelopment< Page 6 • • • • • • SECTION 13: The Tigard Community Development Code is amended by adding a new • subsection 18.810.020.E. to read as follows: 13 Except as provided in Section 18 810 O30S as used in this chapter,the term"strets' shalt mean'tpub1t streets"urless an adjustment under • • gfRacm\90024\codeamend.rd1(6/4/99) • • • • • • • • • • • • Page 7 • • • • • a; SENDER: I also wish to receive the :0 ■Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. fOIIOWIn services(for an I. a ■Complete items 3,4a,and 4b. 9 • an •Print your name and address on the revers this form so that we can return this extra fee): 12 card to you. 6 W •Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space does not 1.❑ Addressee's Address ? `- •permit.t"Return Receipt Requested"on the mailpiece below the article number. 2.❑ Restricted Delivery d t ■The Retum Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date N delivered. Consult postmaster for fee. a o 3.Article Addressed to: 4a.Article Number C.3i A��/� Z'/35 /9a 38'3 � ' o /'!`r'v 4b.Service Type _E I o 4Hit �nda$ I P/C`nr)1 J ❑ Registered a' ' ertified p� o (QO /(/E Gtd`? nue / °'i ❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured c POr�/�t d 0 9 7 3 °II ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 COD 8 o 9 7.Date,of Delivery ..i ,6 - �.25- �1 'I . 5.Received By: (Print Name) 8.Addressee's Address(Only if requested •r and fee is paid) m 6.Signs e: (Ad. e-.ee orAgent) t t— o>. • X • y PS Form 3811, 'ecember 1994 102595-98-B-0229 Domestic Return Receipt • Z 435 490 383 NUS Postal Service ' k Receipt for Certified Mail I i Metro ATTN: LAND USE & PLANNING 0 600 NE Grand Avenue ,,V Portland, OR 97232-2736 0. . o• • Postage $ • Certified Fee ■• • N / -c/ p •% 7 Special Delivery Fee Q� Restricted Delivery Fee rn Return Receipt Showing to Whom&Date Delivered , c.. i. a Return Receipt Showing to Whom, � �� < Date,&Addressee's Address ! `ti 2 TOTAL Postage&Fees .'$r F � ate. Cr) 0 Postmark or Date \ GJ , : ' ?,a0....° ' 0 • • • • • • • ---I ' SENDER: I also wish to receive the I •Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. following services(for an , W •Complete items 3,4a,and 4b. 9 S8services at ■Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this extra fee): • e card to you. ai ' 1:1) •Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space does not 1.❑ Addressee's Address ` Write° 2.❑ Restricted Delivery ro I ■Write°Return Receipt Requested°on the mailpiece below the article number. ry w ■The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date ▪ delivered. Consult postmaster for fee. o' o 3.Article Addressed to: Dev 4a.Arti le Number d, ill Or5,5'n �i of Ja /025c1v4 d Z c6 3.251026 f1 CC 17:1 4b.Service Type «I o,��., d u ,r ' %: Myrt1 f C C 0 Certified (p?j5 ,JJ 54-reed A/G,dur��j�❑ Express Mail 0 Insured C "`I"t f.Da l 5 7V ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD z G c r 0 " 77.3.501- -4/0 7. D of e `2,9 ,. s ! T 5. eceived B :i(Prin ame) 8. dressee s Address( nl Y if requested x i.J l ,� 0 and fee is paid) 6. ule: (A1'dresseeorAge ) r• .1 c.3 (,•-! : y PS Form 3811,December 1994 1o2595-9a-s-o229 Domestic Return Receipt It • = Z 463 251 269 • N JS Postal Service . . #ieceipt for Certified Mail • k Oregon Dept. of Land Conservation & Dev; o'ATTN: LARRY FRENCH . • %,635 Capital Street NE, Suite 150 . i Salem, OR 97301-2540 a. tr- ' Postage $ 1 • lit N Certified Fee . \ 'L\ 1Z-1 0 Spedal Delivery Fee • • Restricted Delivery Fee o' ° R• eturn Receipt Showing to 1 W• hom&Date Delivered ,,F, i . Return Receipt Showaig to 1 AI s..,, < Date,&Addressee's Address n. .s t `l O \ 2t t O TOTAL Postage&Fees\�$ C/ Postmark or Date -' u_ Cl) a. . • IP • • ai SENDER: I also wish to receive the 1 :42 •Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. following services(for an 1 (0 •Complete items 3,4a,and 4b. a> •Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this extra fee): card to you. v > •Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space does not 1.El Addressee's Address .2� i a, permit. •Write"Return Receipt Requested'on the mailpiece below the article number. 2.I:1 Restricted Delivery N ■The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date .. delivered. Consult postmaster for fee. o . 0 3.Article Addressed to: 4a.Article Number d I Otx3T—NeC5/0/9 /, D'sfr / s?, i„ z413.5-1/F6 3�a • I ,r:�_. 4b:Service Type m r r - o j .ne £S/CS, Pere/// /�5t ,j]\Registered Certified ti v '❑ El`press Mail ❑ Insured e 551�/o Sev Gicsf arrdc ,ft f Z.f .y, w `/' \ 1� ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD m i i o POrle- 4nd1 d e f 7,a/- 9 y`�`96 ,7,6D of Delivery =I a y\`��/'S g.1 1 Z 5.Received By: (Print Name) _°°'°`8.Addressee's Address(Only if requested ..Ng . J L and fee is paid) R JW t( 6.Signature: ( or Agent)1 0 PS Form 38 1, cember 1994 102595-98-B-0229 Domestic Return Receipt Z 435 490 382 S Postal Service Receipt for Certified Mail c - - r ' ODOT—Region 1, District 2-A o I Jane Estes, Permit Specialist 15440 SW Westgate Drive, Suite 350, Portland, OR 97221-2414 . • o• Q Postage $ `� 7 N Certified Fee it Lf O i . ‘.,.._. . Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee to ° Return Receipt Showing tom •- Whom&Date Delivered J�2a%:. a Return Receipt Showing to Whom,/ ;'e < Date,&Addressee's Address G• _ CO 'TOTAL Postage&Fees I '. ' M Postmark or Date �� N.8 U- ,r J ,.. ‘ . rn I