The URL can be used to link to this page

Hearings Officer Packet - 12/09/1996• PUBLIC NOTICE: Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Hearings Officer meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the meeting. Please call (503) 639-4171, Ext. 320 (voice) or (503) 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: ? Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and ? Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of Tigard of your need(s) by 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above. (OVER FOR MEETING AGENDA ITEM(S) TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER PAGE 1 OF 2 12/9/96 PUBLIC HEARING h:\patty\masters\agendho.mst CITY OF TIGARD • HEARINGS OFFICER DECEMBER 9, 1996 - 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC HEARING 2.1 ?AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE.< CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96-0009 The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval to develop an 80-foot-tall cellular communications monopole structure and associated equipment structures. LOCATION: 12925 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S1 0213D, Tax Lot 02600. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial (C-G). ZONING DESIGNATION: General Commercial (C-G). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130, and 18.164. 3. OTHER BUSINESS 4. ADJOURNMENT CITY OF TIGARD Community (Development SFiaping A (Better Community TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER PAGE 2 OF 2 12/9/96 PUBLIC HEARING h:\patty\masters\agendho.mst n u • COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684.0360 C E Q ?yfo?rkfce TT 8689 BEAVERTON OREGON 97075 *City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. *Tigard,Oregon 97223 Accounts Payable • Legal Notice Advertising 1,996 CITY OF T(GAjr • ? Tearsheet Notice • ? Duplicate Affidavit • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss. 1, Kathy Snyder being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of theTli carrl -Vial a ti n Times a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at Ticrard in the i aforesaid county and state; that the CUP96-0009 Airtouch Cellular Monopole a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and consecutive in the following issues: November 28,1996 Subscribed and sworn My Commission Expires: AFFIDAVIT The following will be considered by the Tigard Hearings officer on Monday, December 9 1996 at 7 P.M., at Tigard Civic Center - Town Ha11,13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. Both public, oral and written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal Code, and rules and procedures of the Hearings Officer. Failure to raise an issue in Yoerson or by letter accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to allow the hearings authority and all parties to riterion respond precludes an appeal, and failure to specify thvecPlan at whmt a Community Development Code or based on that criterion. Further comment is directed precludes an appeal Planning Division at 13125 . information Boulevard, Tigard,t0 egon 972 3e or by calling (503) 639-4171 S W H PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96.0009 > AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE < The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop an 80-foot tall monopole tower with antennae and equipment cabinet on an existing commercial site. LOCATION: 12925 S.W. Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S1 0213D, Tax Lot 02600. ZONE: General Commercial (C-G). The purpose of the C-G zoning district is to provide sites for a wide range and se services. Permit. AsPP are Conditional LICABLEtREVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42,18,62,18.98,18.10 , 18.102, 18.106, 18.120 and 18.130. a me this28th day of Nove Notary i lic for Oregon it . M' T178689 - Publish November 28, 1996. CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 9,1996 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96-0009 FILE TITLE: AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE APPLICANT: W & H Pacific, Inc. OWNER: Estate of Rosemarie Emery Attn: Chris Eaton 1360 SW Woodward Way 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Portland, OR 97225 Beaverton, OR 97008-7120 REQUEST ? The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 60-foot tall monopole tower with antennae and equipment cabinet on an existing commercial site. LOCATION: 12925 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S1 0213D, Tax Lot 02600. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.120, and 18.130. ZONE: General Commercial (C-G). The purpose of the C-G zoning district is to provide sites for a wide range of goods and services. Utilities are also permitted subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684- 2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. CUP 96-0009 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE NOTICE OF 1219196 PUBLIC HEARING • • ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER NOVEMBER 18, 1996, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25?) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25G) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MARK ROBERTS AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON. CUP 96-0009 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE NOTICE OF 12/9/96 PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF POSTPONEMENT OF PREVIOUSLY NOTICED PUBLIC NEARING ITEM NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE FOLLOWING ITEM HAS BEEN POSTPONED TO A DATE UNCERTAIN AND WILL NOT BE HEARD BY THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, ON DECEMBER 9, 1996, AS PREVIOUSLY INDICATED. THE PREVIOUS NOTICE MISTAKENLY INDICATED AN INCORRECT PROJECT SITE. ONCE A DATE CERTAIN HAS BEEN SET, NOTICE OF THE NEW PUBLIC HEARING DATE WILL BE RE-MAILED. FILE NO: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96-0008 FILE TITLE: TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH MAJOR MODIFICATION APPLICANT: First Baptist Church OWNER: Same 11075 SW Gaarde Street Tigard, OR 97224 REQUEST ? The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to add an 8,000 square foot building to the existing First Baptist Church site for related religious assembly purposes. LOCATION: 11075 SW Gaarde Street; WCTM 2S1 03DC, Tax Lot 01100. The site is located at the north-west corner of SW 110th Avenue and SW Gaarde Street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.48, 18.96, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130, and 18.164. ZONE: R-3.5 (Residential, 3.5 units per acre). The purpose of the R-3.5 zoning district is to establish large urban residential home sites. CUP 96-0008 TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH MAJOR MOD. NOTICE OF ITEM POSTPONEMENT TO DATE UNCERTAIN CITY OF TIGARD .PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 9, 1996 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96-0008 FILE TITLE: TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH MAJOR MODIFICATION APPLICANT: First Baptist Church OWNER: Same 11075 SW Gaarde Street Tigard, OR 97224 REQUEST ? The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to add an 8,000 square foot building to the existing First Baptist Church site for related religious assembly purposes. LOCATION: 11075 SW Gaarde Street; WCTM 2S1 03DD, Tax Lot 01100. The site is located at the north-west corner of SW 110th Avenue and SW Gaarde Street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.48, 18.96, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130, and 18.164. ZONE: R-3.5 (Residential, 3.5 units per acre). The purpose of the R-3.5 zoning district is to establish large urban residential home sites. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684- 2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER CUP 96-0008 TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH MAJOR MOD. PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS 0 0 NOVEMBER 18 ,1996, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25?) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25C) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MARK ROBERTS AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON. If ?I ?r r- I CUP 96-0008 TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH MAJOR MOD. PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS • • BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application for a conditional use permit ) FINAL ORDER for an 80-foot tall tower for cellular telephone antennas ) and an accessory structure in the C-G zone at 12925 ) CUP 96-0009 SW Pacific Highway in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) (Airtouch Cellular) I. SUMMARY The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit for an 80-foot tall tower that will support antennas for cellular telephone services and for a related equipment building and associated development. The proposed use will occupy the northwest roughly 1600 square feet of a commercially developed 0.87-acre parcel. The proposed use has vehicular access to SW Pacific Highway through the existing parking lot on the site. The applicant will enclose the cellular tower site with a 7-foot tall slatted chain link fence. The applicant will preserve existing trees abutting the site and will plant vegetation (15 conifer trees providing about 375 square feet of new landscaping) along the northwest and southeast sides of the tower site. A 12- x 20-foot accessory building will adjoin the tower. A duly noticed public hearing was held to review the application. City staff recommended approval. The applicant accepted the staff recommendation without objections. No one else appeared at the hearing orally or in writing. The hearings officer approves the conditional use permit as provided herein. II. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE, SURROUNDINGS AND PUBLIC FACILITIES The hearings officer incorporates by reference the findings about the site and surroundings in Section III of the City of Tigard Staff Reported dated November 27, 1996 (the "Staff Report"), and the agency comments in Section V of the Staff Report. III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS The hearings officer incorporates by reference the approval standards in Section IV of the Staff Report. IV. HEARINGS AND RECORD 1. Hearings Officer Larry Epstein (the "hearings officer") received testimony at the public hearing about this application on December 9, 1996. The record closed at the conclusion of the hearing. The testimony is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and Exhibit C (Written Testimony). These exhibits are filed at the Tigard City Hall. 2. At the hearing, city planner Mark Roberts summarized the Staff Report. The applicant's representative, Chris Eaton, accepted the Staff Report without objections or corrections. The applicant's radio engineer, Joe Ahsing, explained why the tower includes two levels for antennas. No one else appeared orally or in writing or by representative. V. EVALUATION OF REQUEST City staff recommended approval of the conditional use permit based on the findings in section IV of the Staff Report. No one disputed those findings. The hearings officer concludes the findings in section IV of the Staff Report accurately reflect the law and the facts. The hearings officer adopts and incorporates those findings as his own. Hearings Oricer Final Order CUP 96-0009 (AirTouch Cellular) Page 1 9 • VI. CONCLUSION AND DECISION 1. Based on the findings adopted and incorporated herein, the hearings officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit complies with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws. 2. In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and other reports of affected public agencies and testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the hearings officer hereby approves CUP 96-0009. DATED this 17th day ber, 1996. Hearings Orcer Final Order CUP 96-0009 (AirTouch Cellular) Page 2 EXHIBIT A • • CITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER SIGN-IN SHEET Community (Development ShapingA Better Community NOTICE: ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN THEIR NAME AND RECORD THEIR ADDRESS ON THIS SHEET ...(Please PRINT LenibhlI AGENDA ITEM #: 1 12.1 1 1 DATE OF HEARING: 12/9/96 Page L of FILE NAME(S): AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE CASE NUMBER(S): [CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96-0009 OWNER(S) ESTATE OF ROSEMARIE EMERY APPLICANT(S): W & H PACIFIC, INC. for AIRTOUCH CELLULAR PROJECT LOCATION: 12925 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY MAP(S) & TAX LOT(S) NO(S). WCTM 2S1 02BD, TAX LOT 02600 PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME ADDRESS, AND INCLUDE YOUR ZIP CODE -------------------------------------------- PROPONENT (For the proposal) OPPONENT (Against the proposal) -------------------------------------------------- -- 111101 Name/Address/lip a Affiliation) Print Name/Addrmfilo aAtAliallool Name: Name: Address: Address: City: State: Zip: City: State: Zip: Name: Name: Address: Address: City: State: Zip: City State: Zip: Name: Name: Address: Address: City: State: Zip: City: State: Zip: hApatty\masters\signinho. mst • 0 EXHIBIT B • 0 EXHIBIT C J? • • Agenda Item: 2.1 Hearing Date: December 9, 1996 7:00 PM SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Conditional Use Permit CUP 96-0009 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval to develop an 80-foot-tall cellular communications monopole structure and associated equipment structures. APPLICANT: AirTouch Cellular OWNER: Estate of Rosemarie Emery 15575 SW Sequoia Parkway 1360 SW Woodward Way Portland, OR 97224 Portland, OR 97225 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial (C-G). ZONING DESIGNATION: General Commercial (C-G). LOCATION: 12925 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S1 0213D, Tax Lot 02600. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130, and 18.164. SECTION II: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Hearing's Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL. STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 1 • Site HistoQL The property is developed with a retail commercial building that is occupied by a mixture of retail and office uses. In 1981 Site Development Review, Minor Land Partition, Variance, and Zone Change approvals were issued for a 4,800 square foot expansion to the existing commercial center. This approved addition was not developed. The City has no record of any more recent development applications having been filed for this property. Vicinity Information: To the north the site is adjoined by an apartment project. The proposed lease area is adjoined by the site's primary existing retail commercial use to the south. The property is adjoined by other commercial uses to the west and to the east. Site Information and Proposal Description: The western portion of the site is presently developed with a retail commercial center. The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit Approval to develop an 80-foot cellular communication tower facility and related equipment structures. The Public Hearing Notice for this request inadvertently listed the height of the proposed monopole at 60 feet. Although the application itself states that a 60-foot height is being requested, all of the detailed application materials state that an 80-foot height is requested. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build a 80 foot cellular monopole. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as a utility. Code Section 18.62 lists utilities as a conditionally permitted use in the General Commercial Zoning District. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.62 states that there is no minimum lot size requirements. Developments within the General Commercial Zoning District are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant has provided a landscape plan for the leasehold area that is proposed to be developed. The plan appears to provide in excess of the 15% minimum landscaping requirement. The applicant shall provide calculations concerning the percentage of landscaping to impervious surface ratio within the leasehold area. STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 2 Setback: Section 18.56.050 states that there is no front yard or side yard setback facing the street. No side and rear yard setbacks are required except; a minimum of 20 feet shall be required where a commercial use abuts a residential zoning district. The site adjoins a residential zoning district and complies with the 20-foot setback standard of the General Commercial Zoning District as proposed. Building Height Limitations - Exceptions: Section 18.98.020 states that any building located in a non-residential zoning district shall not exceed a height of 75 feet subject to certain criteria. Section 18.98.010 exempts structures that are not intended for human habitation from this limitation. The proposed cellular monopole is not intended for human habitation and is exempt from the height requirement as provided under Section 18.98.010. Street Trees: Section 18.100.035 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart. The maximum planting distance is dependent on the trees size at maturity. A minimum of a two inch caliper tree at four feet in height is required at planting. The existing commercial center does not have street trees. For this reason, the shopping center is not currently in compliance with this standard. It is recommended that this section be found to be not applicable to this proposal. The proposed leasehold area does not have direct frontage on a Public Street. The existing site improvements are not made more non-conforming through the development of a new communications use. This interpretation is consistent with the Non-Conforming Structure provisions of Section 18.132.040 (C). Screening Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has not proposed to develop a parking lot in conjunction with this use, therefore, the listed parking lot screening provisions are not applicable. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30-foot distance points with a straight line. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, signs, temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The height is measured from the top of the curb. Where no curb exists the height is measured from the street grade at the center line. Trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. The applicant has not proposed to construct improvements that exceed the aforementioned height within the Clear Vision areas. STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 3 • • Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030 does not specify a minimum parking ratio requirement for an unmanned utility use such as the proposed cellular communications monopole. The applicant has not provided a parking lot to serve this development. Because there is no minimum parking ratio for this type of facility, no off- street parking has been provided. Access: Section 18.108.080 states that commercial and industrial uses that require less than 100 parking spaces provide one (1) access with a minimum width of 30-feet, and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. This use does not require that parking spaces be provided therefore, two-way access is also not needed to serve this facility. For this reason, no specific access width is required for this use. Through the Building Permit Fire and Life Safety Review, any necessary revisions will be made to this plan for emergency vehicle access. Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Sections 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130, 18.134 18.150 and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Sections are reviewed within this staff report. Site Development Review - Additional Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (Sensitive Lands), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), 18.120.180.11 (Access and Circulation) 18.120.180 (Public Transit), 18.120.180.12, (Parking) 18.120.180.13, (Drainage) 18.120.180.15, (Provision for the Handicapped) 18.120.180.16, (Signs) 18.120.180.17 and are therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. This proposal does contain elements related to Sections 18.120.180.2 (Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment), 18.120.180.4 (Buffering and Screening), 18.120.180.10 (Crime Prevention and Safety), 18.120.180.14 (Landscaping); and are reviewed elsewhere within this report. The underlying provisions of the General Commercial Zoning District are also reviewed elsewhere within this staff report. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 provides the following criteria for review of new developments compatibility with the environment: a. Buildings shall be: (i) Located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage; (ii) Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; (iii) Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire fighting; and (iv) Oriented with consideration for sun and wind; and STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 4 b. Trees having a six inch caliper or greater shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character Section "a" is not applicable as no buildings are proposed to be developed. The application addresses the requirements of Section "b". The applicant does not propose to remove trees through the development of the lease hold area. Existing trees will be used to partially screen the proposed monopole from view. Buffering. Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses: Section 18.120.180.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. The applicant has provided a mixture of screening and buffering materials to screen the ground mounted equipment. Due to its 80-foot height and for communication purposes, it is not possible to screen the entire facility and still allow the necessary clear line of site to the antennae structure. Any plantings at a height of 80-feet would necessitate greater height for the proposed antennae. The monopole itself has been designed to be as unobtrusive as possible given the antennas height requirements. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The applicant has proposed to screen ground mounted equipment through the use of a seven-foot-tall slatted chain link fencing and new landscape plantings along the north and south sides of the proposed leasehold area. Other existing trees around the perimeter of the site will partially screen this facility. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The Police Department reviewed this application and had no comments or concerns with this development as proposed. Landscaping: Section 18.120.180.14 provides the following standards for the provision of landscaping: a. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.100. b. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and c. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped; The applicants compliance with the requirements set forth in Section "a" is reviewed elsewhere within this report. Section "b" is found to be inapplicable to the proposal because these sections refer to privacy, noise, glare and outdoor common areas that are all unaffected by this proposal. A minimum of 15% of the overall existing site area is presently landscaped. A minimum of 15% of the proposed leasehold area is to be landscaped. The proposed new landscaping is for areas that are not currently landscaped. STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 5 Conditional Use: Section 18.130.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. 6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The use, as proposed, complies with all site development standards set forth for the General Commercial Zoning District. The property is physically separated from existing residential development due to its location. Fencing, landscaping, and existing trees will partially screen the proposed monopole and fully screen the ground mounted equipment from view. The applicant has not requested that public facilities be made available to serve this development as proposed. All applicable standards of the zoning district are met by this proposal, as reviewed within this staff report. The use is defined as a Minor Impact Utility due to the type of proposed facility. The location criteria for a Minor Impact Utility is that the site have access to a minimum of a Minor Collector Street. The site is proposed to be provided with an access easement to a commercial driveway that provides direct access to SW Pacific Highway, a designated Arterial Street. Traffic will not be routed through local streets to access this facility. The antenna facility will not generate substantial traffic, light, or other impacts as the facility would be an unstaffed communications antennae. The development of this facility will not generate large scale construction impacts due to the type of improvements that are planned. The site will also not require a parking lot. The applicant has also proposed to blend the antenna into the area and reduce the visual impact of the antenna. The antenna is described in the applicant's submittal as being a galvanized metal pole with antennas which are not expected to draw attention to the structure. STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 6 • No other unique, natural features have been noted on this site. The small leased area requires no significant grading or engineering to develop the site as proposed. The applicant has not proposed to develop a site larger than needed for the proposed use, leaving remaining underdeveloped portions of the property for future redevelopment. The specific development criteria of the Comprehensive Plan that addresses the development of this type of utility facility are contained within the adopted Community Development Code. The applicable development standards are addressed within this report. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Engineering Department has reviewed the street and public utility needs for this site. Because this facility will not directly adjoin a public street, no conditions of approval have been recommended concerning street or sidewalk improvements. Because the applicant has also not proposed to extend other utility services to the site, no conditions have been recommended concerning the provision of public utilities. The Building Department has reviewed this request and provided the following comment: A Building Permit is required for all fences, towers, and walls in excess of six feet in height. No other comments or objections have been received. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS No other comments or objections have been received. -: rt'e- PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP Associate Planner APPROVED BY: ` Richard Bewersdo Planning Manager November 27. 1996 DATE November 26. 1996 DATE STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 7 I I Q?1t ? 1 rxr cur 1 I no* I DX Lot ql ao "n 1 Y 1 nw 0? 1 w 1 . jr sna?tx 1 ?I I 1 1 I I • 0 N D Z C N r'? W 0 V Z 2 z z Y PLOT PLAN I CASE No. B '' MAP 4 Air Touch Cellular Monopole i CUP 96-0009 q I Y? -----------?--?---- STA7E HIGHWAY 99W v -_?--?---? ------------- PACOC HIGHWAY) ? I ass i i i i i i i I? I co T U Vicinity NIap Mote: Map is not to scale CUP 96-0009 AirTouch Cellular Monopole N 08/23/96 18:22 $503 684 7297 Cmr OFTiGmn, Omni SIZE DETMOP'-`= REVIEW APPLICaT 0*f CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, TiRSrd, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 1. GZMALAL MORPSATION PQOPE.FTY AD-DRESS/LOCATION Tieard. OR 97223 • CITY OF TIGARD TAX :SAP M TAX LOT NO. W 02 BD + Lot SITE SIZE 1,600 square foot leased area of 0.87 PROPERTY OWUM/DEED ROLDEV Estate of Rosemarie Emer, ADDRESS- 1360 SW Woodward Way PRONE503-378-2911 David CITY Portland. OR 97225 90 (son of truste( 3PPLICANT* W&H Pacific, Inc. for AirTouch Cellul; ADDRESS 8405 SW Nimbus Ave. .PHONE 503-626-0455 CITY Beaverton. OR ZIP 97008-7120 *When the owner And the applicant are different ?ecple, the applicant 'must be the purchaser of record or a lessee :a Dossession With Written authorizatioa from the owner or an agent ok the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or submit a vrittea authorization with this application. 1. PROPOSAL SUMARY The owners of recori of the subject property request site development review approval to allow a 60-foot tall cellular monopole tower with antennae and an equipment building-on the Kim Upholstery site. Z004/009 FOQ STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. OTHM CASE NO'S: RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: DATE: Application elements submitted: (A) application form (1) (B) Owner's signature/written authorization (C) Title transfer instrument (1) C. (D) Assessor's map (1) (E) Plot plan (pre-app checklist) (F) Applicant's statement (pre-app checklist) r (G) List of proper=7 owners and addresses within 250 feet (1) (H) Filing _°ee (tss* rftw.#MULe? (I ) Construction Cost Zscimate DATE DZTESMINED TO BE COMPLETE: DIAL DECISION DEADLVE : COMP. PLAX/ZONE DESIGNATION: Y.P.O. Number: Approval Date: Final Approval Date: ?laamisg 0524P/'_3P ,kev'd 5/87 cagineering • List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or ocher land use actions to be considered as part of this application: Applicants: To have a complete application you will need co submit attachments. described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit chis application. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CF.RSIFY THAT: A. The above rea attached to or nest does not violate any deed restrictions that may be osed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise :he rights granted in accordance with the terns and subject co all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All- of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this Sol- day of 19 :GNATURES of each owner (eo. husband and wife.) of the subject property. Please See nthnri7atinn T.PttPr SL:pm/052='P) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Application for a Conditional Use Permit A Proposal Submitted to the City of Tigard Prepared for: AirTouch Cellular (Formerly USWest Cellular) 15575 SW Sequoia Parkway Portland, Oregon 97224 Prepared by: W&H Pacific 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, Oregon 97008-7120 October 21, 1996 1 1 1 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION .....................................................1 Background on Cellular Communications .................................... 1 Cellular Communications System Improvement ............................... 2 Frequency Emissions ...................................................2 Structural Characteristics ................................................ 2 Proposed Cell Site .....................................................3 Construction and Post-Construction Activity ................................. 3 H. REQUESTED LAND USE REVIEWS ..................................... 4 III. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION ............................................ 4 IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA ...................................... 4 Compliance With Community Development Code ............................. 5 Site Development Review ............................................... 6 V. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CRITERIA (Code Section 18.130) ............... 7 VI. CONCLUSION .......................................................9 VII. EXHIBITS .........................................................10 A. Tigard Zoning Map B. Assessor's Quarter Section Map C. Site Plans D. Digital Photo Simulations (To be submitted under separate cover.) VIII. ATTACHMENTS .................................................... 18 A. Authorization Letter from Property Owner (To be submitted under separate cover.) B. Letter of Support from Property Owner C. Pre-Application Conference Notes 0 AirTouch Cellular - Tigard Site Conditional Use Permit Application October 21, 1996 L INTRODUCTION AirTouch Cellular (formerly US West Cellular) is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval from the City of Tigard to install twelve panel and two dish cellular communications antennae on an 80-foot monopole located at 12925 SW Pacific Highway. A 12-foot wide by 20-foot long by 10-foot high utility structure would also be placed on the site. AirTouch Cellular service began in 1985 on a limited basis (then under the name GTE Mobilnet). The initial system consisted of five locations, and over the years since cellular service was licensed, has grown to approximately 90 sites in the region. As this region continues to grow, cellular communications offer a method of accommodating the increased need for communication in a wireless fashion. This need includes business communications, public safety (i.e., emergency response for police, fire, ambulance and 911), and personal use. Cellular technology has proven to be an invaluable aid to community emergency service providers in that it provides a rapid, efficient means for the traveling public to notify emergency services in the event of accidents, fires, and crimes-in-progress. AirTouch Cellular is currently a cellular provider for emergency services for the greater Metro region. Tigard's emergency service providers desire additional cellular communication capacity in order to provide enhanced service in times of large scale emergencies. The proposed site is especially critical for providing quality coverage for emergency service providers in the Pacific Highway and 217 corridors. Another benefit of cellular technology is its ability to compliment the existing land-based telephone system. For example, the windstorm of December 21, 1995, interrupted standard phone service in many areas. Our cellular network allowed emergency service providers and public utilities to continue operating under these difficult conditions. Cellular communications provide a larger variety of communications options while at the same time preserving livability and valuable resources. For example, in today's fast-paced business environment, wireless telephone is not only essential for business transactions, but increases time savings (improving economic efficiency), and in many instances has the ability to prevent actual physical trips, thereby reducing vehicular trip generation and it's accompanying consumption of natural resources. Cellular technology allows a higher level of both convenience and personal safety for those traveling. The ability to stay in touch with your home and/or business permits greater peace of mind for cellular users, their families, friends, and colleagues. In the wake of important events and/or emergencies, contacting such individuals can be of the utmost importance. The increased popularity of cellular phones has resulted in the need for greater cellular service. 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 • 0 AirTouch Cellular - Tigard Site ' Conditional Use Permit Application October 21, 1996 Cellular Communications System Improvement Additional cell sites are being added where signal strength is poor and to provide added capacity in high call volume areas. Cell sites are also being added to better "balance" the system so that calls are spread more evenly between cells, thereby improving system efficiency. ' Now that the AirTouch cellular system has been in operation here for nearly 12 years, use patterns and use projections can be made with an improved degree of certainty. Cell sites can now be added to the system area "sized" to accommodate local area needs. Effective radiated power is adjusted ' between nearby cell sites to provide good coverage (from a user's standpoint), while at the same time maximizing the AirTouch Cellular system capacity. Antenna height can be a concern with some communities. AirTouch Cellular is cognizant of these concerns and minimizes antenna heights as much as possible in order to minimize impacts. Cellular site selection involves a variety of factors, including line of sight connection to other AirTouch locations, precise topographic elevation, and distance and power considerations. 7 The signals emitted by the proposed AirTouch Cellular antennae/transmitter fall between 880-894 ' megahertz bandwidth. This range of frequencies does not interfere with those used by local emer- gency service providers. The operation of this tower will in no way affect the daily operations of these essential services. In addition, these signals do not interfere with television, FM radio, or other similar ' electronic transmissions. The proposed transmission/receiving facility will operate at a typical power range of 40-200 watts of effective radiated power (ERP). Structural Characteristics The proposed monopole has been structurally designed to exceed state and local regulations for ' towers in accordance with EIA/TIA-222-E standards. These standards dictate that in Oregon, cellular towers must be designed to withstand an average maximum wind speed of 95 miles per hour. From a design standpoint, the proposed 80-foot monopole has a telescopic steel structure that is heavier at the base than at the top. In addition, the footing of the monopole is buried below grade to a depth of approximately 6 to 25 feet. This construction technique allows the monopole to flex when it is subject to high wind. The cross members that sit atop the monopole and hold the antennae panels are also engineered to withstand high winds over long periods of time. The hollow nature of the mono- pole causes the steel shaft to bend instead of breaking if it is struck by a falling object. One potential cause of monopole collapse would be an undermining of the soil strata upon which the monopole footing rests. Extensive soils analysis for engineering parameters, such as bearing capacity and plasticity, allow the structural design of foundations adequate to preclude such an event. Nonetheless, should such failure occur, it is not likely that adjacent structures would be compromised. To date, there has been only one recorded incident of monopole compromise in the United States. AirTouch Cellular - Tigard Site Conditional Use Permit Application October 21, 1996 , This compromise occurred in southern Florida during Hurricane Andrew (which had sustained winds ' in excess of 120 mph). The monopole compromise consisted of a 5 to 15 degree lean in the mono- pole shaft. , Monopoles are generally not affected by icing since there are no horizontal components for ice to cling to. Any ice that would form on the tower as a result of freezing rain would slide off and fall to ' the base of the tower. Since freezing rain episodes are not typically associated with high winds, falling ice would not pose a hazard to any surrounding buildings. If required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), this monopole may be lit. FAA approval of this facility is a requirement for the cellular courier, above and beyond requirements from the City. 1 AirTouch Cellular plans to utilize a vacant portion of the property located at 12925 SW Pacific ' Highway (currently zoned General Commercial (C-G)), to install a new cellular transmission/receiving facility. The new cellular transmission/receiving site is proposed to improve cellular coverage along the Pacific Highway corridor, between Highway 217 and southeast Washington County. , The site is accessed from Pacific Highway via a paved parking lot on the east third of the subject ' property. The lease site is located in the southwest corner of the site, on an area that is currently covered with grass (refer to Exhibits A, B and Q. Development on the site includes an L-shaped, two-story building (one-story above grade fronting Pacific Highway) surrounded by parking lots on , three sides. The site is located immediately to the south of a convenience store and gas station. Other adjacent uses include apartments to the west and commercial development across Pacific Highway to the east. Adjacent zoning districts are General Commercial (C-G) to the north, south and east, Neighborhood Commercial (C-N) to the northwest and Multi-Family Residential (R12) to the west. AirTouch Cellular's radio engineers conducted a service area study to determine siting criteria and ' the acceptable geographic area for the cell site. When feasible, AirTouch Cellular installs antennas on existing structures (e.g., water towers, buildings, other transmission towers). In the case of the proposed Tigard site, there are no such features within the technical search area for "co-locating" that ' meet AirTouch's technical criteria. The proposed site was found to be the most suitable site in the area. In fact, without a facility in such location, it would be necessary to install multiple towers on both ends of the city to provide equal coverage. Construction and Post-Construction Activitv llular s construction schedule spans an approximate 30-40 day time frame. The construc- tion schedule allows for mobilization, material delivery, poor weather conditions and other scheduling ' constraints. Therefore, the actual time period for erecting the monopole and installing the equipment shelter may be less than 10 days. The equipment shelter and cellular equipment is pre-manufactured 1 i r AirTouch Cellular - Tigard Site ' Conditional Use Permit Application October 21, 1996 offsite. All staging of construction equipment will occur on the subject property, in conformance with City of Tigard standards. The purpose of the cellular transmitting/receiving site is to facilitate cellular use. The proposed shelter houses the transmitting/receiving equipment which is fully automated (unstaffed). Occasionally, the equipment requires maintenance or repair, in which case a technician will visit the site. Typically, this would occur approximately once every 30 to 45 days. IL REQUESTED LAND USE REVIEWS The applicant requests the following land use reviews from the City of Tigard for placement of a ' cellular telecommunication facility at 12925 SW Pacific Highway: ? The applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit ' M. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION ' The project consists of an 80-foot monopole and a 12-foot by 20-foot by 10-foot equipment shelter. Twelve panel and two dish antennae will be attached to the monopole. The facility will be sized to accommodate increased capacity in the future (this site could potentially co-locate an additional twelve antennae), without increasing the monopole height, or adding new poles or towers in the technical service area. ' As illustrated in the site plan (Exhibit C), the proposed cell site is located behind an existing commercial building fronting Pacific Highway. There will not be any open storage within the proposal area, and the facility will be surrounded by a 7-foot tall sight obscuring fence in accordance with the ' City of Tigard Zoning Code, Sections 18.100 and 18.120. There will be 300 square feet of land- scaping around the lease area to screen the proposed shelter building. ' All existing trees in the project vicinity will be retained, the facility will not generate appreciable sound or glare, and the monopole's galvanized steel finish is the same finish as nearby light standards ' and will blend with the surrounding features and colors. Its visual impact will be further minimized by facility location on the cell site, cell site location on the parent parcel, and existing site topography and vegetation, and surrounding commercial development. Exhibit D shows two views of photo- simulation of the proposed monopole. IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The following is a review of applicable review requirements. F 0 0 AirTouch Cellular - Tigard Site Conditional Use Permit Application October 21, 1996 Use Classification, 18.42 Response: The use is classified as a utility. Code Section 18.62 lists utilities as a conditionally permitted use in the C-G district. C-G Zone Dimensional Requirements, 18.62.050 Minimum Lot Size: Average Lot Width: Maximum Building Height: Setbacks Front: Side: Rear: Corner: Maximum Lot Coverage: Minimum Landscaping: N/A 50 feet N/A (non-habitable structure) N/A N/A 20 feet (adjoins residential district) N/A 85% 15% Response: The proposal is consistent with all relevant dimensional requirements. Over 15 percent (15%) of the site is landscaped. The proposed landscaping improvements are further discussed under the response to Section 18.120.180 (A) 14 - Landscaping. Special Setbacks, 18.98.020 Response: A 50-foot setback from the centerline of Highway 99W is required. The proposal complies with the standard. Building Height Limitations - Exceptions, 18.98.020 Response: Nonhabitable structures are exempt to the height limitation standards. The proposed monopole and equipment shelter are nonhabitable. Screening Special Provisions, 18.100.110(A) Response: No parking is required; therefore, the standards do not apply. Visual Clearance Areas, 18.102 Response: This proposal does not impact the visual clearance areas. 5 0 AirTouch Cellular - Tigard Site ' Conditional Use Permit Application October 21, 1996 Parking and Access, 18.106.030 and 18.106.080 Response: According to City staff, parking is not required for the proposed use. ' Site Development Review T t Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that the development proposal be found consistent with various standards of the Community Development Code. ' Buffering, Screening, and Compatibility between Adjoining Uses, 18.120.180 (A)4 ' Response: The cellular communication tower and electronics equipment building will be'screened from the commercial uses to the north, residential uses to the west and northwest, and commercial uses to the east and northeast, south and southwest (see Attachment C, Pre-Application notes). Screening will consist of a 7-foot tall sight-obscuring fence which will surround the facility. In addition, existing trees provide substantial screening. There are several existing, mature (50 to 70-foot tall, 12 to 24-inch caliper) trees to the north and west of the proposed site (see Exhibit C, Site ' Plan). Additional landscaping is proposed for the southeast and northeast sides of the site. The site is ' further buffered by the site's topography. The proposed cell site is approximately 10 feet below the grade of Highway 99W. ' Access and Circulation, 18.120.180 (A)I] a. The number of allowed access points for a development shall be as provided in Section - 18.108.070; ' b. All circulation patterns within a development shall be designed to accommodate emergency vehicles, c. Provisions shall be made for pedestrian ways and bicycle ways if such facilities are shown ' on an adopted plan. Response: 18.120.180 (A)1 l.a. applies to residential use only. No changes to existing paved parking ' lots (covering 0.35 acres of a 0.87 acre lot) are included in this application. The Pacific Highway sidewalk currently accommodates the site access needs of pedestrians. The site is currently serviced by TriMet routes 12 and 99X; the nearest bus stop is located on the southeast corner of Pacific ' Highway and Walnut Street. Due to the nature of this facility, it is highly unlikely that any other individuals other than service technicians will ever access the site. Landscaping, 18.120.180 (A)14 a. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.100; 1 0 0 AirTouch Cellular - Tigard Site Conditional Use Permit Application October 21, 1996 ' b. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of Subsections S and 6 ' above, a minimum of 20 percent (20916) of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; ' C. A minimum of IS percent (15916) of the gross site area shall be landscaped Response: This application includes approximately 300 square feet of new landscaping, more than ' 15 percent (15%) of the 1,225 square-foot (SF) lease area. Landscaping will add vegetation to the southeast and northeast sides of the site. Combined with the existing large trees on the northwest and southwest side of the leased area the entire lease areas will be surrounded by vegetative cover. All ' landscaping will be designed and installed in accordance with City standards. V. CONDITIONAL USE PERNM CRITERIA (Code Section 18.130) ' Zoning Ordinance Section 18.62.040(A)4 authorizes this Conditional Use proposal in the C-G district. Code Section 18.130.040 Approval Standards and Conditions apply to this proposal. 18.130.040(A) (1) The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; 1 Response: The site size and dimensions are adequate for the proposed use. The cell site will be located behind the existing building, preserving the northwest portion of the property for future development. The proposal is consistent with the C-G zone site coverage requirements and all dimensional requirements. The site utilizes existing trees, topography, and proposed landscaping to , screen the site from adjacent residential uses. (2) The characteristics of the size are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography and natural features; Response: The cell site is suitable for the proposed use. This flat, square-shaped site is located in ' AirTouch Cellular's primary search area behind the Kim Upholstery Building. The cell site is located on the least prominent part of the site, approximately one-story below finished grade at the site entrance. Existing perimeter landscaping will be incorporated to enhance site screening. No topo- graphic or natural constraints exist on the site. The proposal constitutes an efficient use of an other- wise unusable area. (3) All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; ' Response: The site is served by the full compliment of public facilities. Sewer and water are not ' required for the proposed use. The site has excellent access to Highway 99W. Power and telephone are available. ' AirTouch Cellular - Tigard Site ' Conditional Use Permit Application October 21, 1996 ' (4) The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter, Response: All applicable requirements of the zoning district will be met. (S) The supplemental requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114, Signs, and Section 18.120.180, Approval Standards, if applicable, are met, I? ?J I' .J Response: No signs will be provided. As demonstrated in Section IV., this proposal complies with all relevant approval standards. (6) The use will comply with the applicable policies of the comprehensive plan. Response: The Tigard Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged and Community Development Codes have been adopted to implement it. Applicable Community Development Code approval criteria have been addressed. Comprehensive Plan Section VIII (B) under Public Facilities and Services (Private Facilities/Communication) does not address cellular communications. Goal 12 Locational Criteria [Section 12.4. LA_ (1) and (2)] / Minor Impact Utilities and Facilities are applicable to this proposal. This site lies within AirTouch Cellular's Primary Search Area to provide appropriate levels of service. As demonstrated, this proposed location provides appropriate access and required services are available. The proposed use is an unmanned cellular telephone transmitter/ receiver station that will include a pre-manufactured 12-foot wide by 20-foot long by 10-foot high equipment shelter and a 80-foot steel pole with antennae. The site will be remotely monitored, and visited by a technician approximately once every 30 to 45 days. Site access will not cause dangerous intersections or traffic congestion. Site will transmit on radio frequencies licensed to AirTouch Cellular by the FCC, in compliance with all FCC regulations and standards for transmission power levels. The site was placed in the back corner of the property adjacent to Pacific Highway to remain visually unobtrusive from adjacent properties. The site, as proposed, will have no significant impact upon the operations of the existing property or the surrounding properties. Existing landscaping at the site will not be significantly affected by this project. Existing parking lot lighting will remain unaffected. Adverse effects from the site are minimal. The proposed cell site will not produce dust, odor, or glare after construction ends. Except for two small HVAC condensers, which generate a slight amount of noise, no sound emanates from the site. These units are located away from the existing residential buildings. Installation of this uninhabited cell tower does not affect the privacy of adjacent residential developments. The proposed monopole will be placed among existing trees at the lowest site eleva- tion to provide maximum screening. A Moot high sight obscuring fence will provide further screening. The pole is covered with galvanized steel, similar to nearby light standards. 0 • AirTouch Cellular - Tigard Site Conditional Use Permit Application October 21, 1996 ' Some minor noise and traffic will be generated during construction, but that noise will not be heard , above the existing noise emanating from Pacific Highway. During the brief construction phase, several vehicle-trips per day will be generated, however, such trips should not be noticeable in this urban area or intrude upon the privacy of adjacent multi-family residential development. The site was , chosen at a location on this lot to provide cellular phone coverage of Pacific Highway, while being minimally intrusive upon the visual environment of the area. Since the site is unmanned, and the neighborhood is a commercial area, the minimal traffic generated would not be noticed. VL CONCLUSION 1 Based on the foregoing analysis and findings, the applicant requests approval of the proposed design review and conditional use permit applications. The application meets all applicable criteria for I approval. 1 ? 9 • • AirTouch Cellular - Tigard Site Conditional Use Permit Application October 21, 1996 VII. EXHIBITS A. Tigard Zoning Map B. Assessor's Quarter Section Map C. Site Plans D. Digital Photo Simulations (To be submitted under separate cover.) v 10 EXHIBIT A Tigard Zoning Map 0 EXHIBIT A D 0, ! 1_11?? I-A 2 3= CL ?ggyx 11?_t •r' .,? I ' `?, • i,,;. ?''?' :.?•s-•'?, •,/• ???ri,,{? :"±? 1-f•-?1?) '-r- ' I Li!]d 1. t _ jfT.l.l.•? ?\ •' .• I•/;r??'., \\ ' \ ? `?j.^.'ji n,,, '` ;:` f?l {l °'''r' \`IIl' '?X"? _ .. lot. - ?-? ' J? j_ ? ?-III "- •??f3'! :?1???. . :,``.• \ ,{' yl.,,'? w.?`1 ?`?` JI ;•=,?i •,`,•, ? I r 1 1 r 1 I _ I 'j '% I to L'? ? /,:.?? : /r/ ? ?' -.i,?,.; •?.1 •+' % 1. La j cam''` / , ,? ?? //,. I ??????? , ??\ `,? - /'? /` ?_ =^/ ?. ..lAY ?• Ill bu Y!,•y?' of '? a? /.?? \'.?'?,`' i ??j ? 41' ??`?`'a•,_4'\ -.':.. It. ('? ,. -,..`?. - I may? ? ?y? ?/?? I???, ^? ? /•.; ^ .. ' r' ? ? /-? ?••\\\ ?`?.??.•i?.' 1 - •.E_ _t-t Ji 2'S Trt \I . 7? \ Q \ 1 ?1(i11V. `, ',?ij ? ' al? :. .T?S••:f_ ,LV ?_.r? Pi ? Y, .;?;,:•? ? ?.•• . ?? ??-? ?, ? yy?l,--? ,? \`?;/'?, \ ; ` `. ? W . •\? . ; Imo. (:\? ? CD. R?w??m?l?i. - ?pv'h? i?`??('? /?.' ?yl'il V?•V?'`Ir?-,I ???/,' \ \ I1 ?- - ?? t %?ky'??,V???o; t •••+ ..r? eM _.. S ? ? ??t ?},,?/ jai !• .?' % , ?r`1- ? ? t?:i t I' ?.. '. 'N I . J ' '? vt?' •t. IA:?'s. E.ti r t •' \???7i ??? \ )' \ ?._..L... 1 ' nv_ I _ i • CI __.I' I .r vr{ I , Cv. • -IC- -•i - -.? ?7: `\ti 1?\\???ti • \ l ??1'? .r ? +- ?? ?--f" ? i 'r'7dv'r.l,?. - r-'r-- M \\ \ \\?• 'S??,\ ?n•,ly' -L ' i•,I ...:1. '--r'?:- 3 .M--, r --1 t, ?` >.'J,,,"'r •. W, \ - - j 3 Z = 3\ \\\? \\ I•?\.:?, .,}tea i i I'r'-' `rl, I I rte, 17 14 114P ? ?;?;'?".:? ?L?:•`??i,`• ?\`\ \ ? ?\? ?_ lr.. _ r ?t•?1.. ? --! i- - C?i '! I' ? (^ 1 I I tIN (I I. :?1 -I 'Y\\\?e?\\\?` ?\?\ ,\ ?\\\ ? .`? \?•?. ?"? l f?i,,,?•?'•. ? h Ti-I I-- ;' ?l ?t-;--I •I, I 111 ? ?'?.?: 'v ,;?-?.`?• `,•, , , .?s_'-? '\?\`?? .? • ,?? ??--.,:?, \ ?= _ •i , ,• ?; i , i... I ,C v I.':'jLJ L. __. I _ ?? \\ ?vv \\\\\, \•\` \ ?? j' S , ?I ' i I i !_. Ja -, \\\\?\?\\\\1 ?' .Jl ??.I.,ll?,j ',? ?. - ii? ?Al Ell -.»I •, ?\??? ` ? 0 "M 1 1 • • EXHIBIT B 1 1 Assessor's Quarter Section Map t4- - u Om 0U Q MN Je.?ro?or ti t bVU Q S _il N Oh N ?1 ~ 11 ? tai o o? d ?? O a 0 dl`1t?' N a• O Q ? ? o? q; 4610 ?4 rob ? ? /?. / ear .e ? 0% •/ O ' Y N 0) N o? z0 ?U) ?u .b a Q q4?f? o• I/ /I \- 0 u O Q O z p? b EXHIBIT B ?i - ? pNi 4 ; G .'y 0 O ? ti ? do ro ...... . ...... . h ?a o . or? y O? O ble y, N • 0u O'% N W y , 1/P 0 Q OQ O,q oN C 0 c Y c d CO) 1 1 1 • • EXHIBIT C Site Plans F, I t 7 a r ABBREVIATIONS Rev Date Description Eng w riei AWG American Wire Guope AW ' r o ® le-w h orgYd bean far a1rA r.rl.. 101 1 DETAIL SYMBOL C bh T1 CLC Cdlki Q 8-2hM rwtelan b a- rar e rY ?G eWie rr Y?Y mornater - dded &od" am doowtPftft 1 _ISECTION PAIR ? Droeng Exterior TIGARD/99 CELLULAR SITE ® M 23-11 p*ew wale a dee-Woe u T1 MIN MWMaximum num FR M f t alrre r.hMwr M anu ac urer NIC Not Ibt In In contract OREGON TIGARD WIS Not to stale , 4 Tl 2 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS SIY Shear STL scot TOC Top of Concrete ?of Masonry TOY ?I? DO y Ifrl"s UDN Ofhsnbs Noted WWF Welded wire Fabric ' eABBREVIATIONS & SYMBOLS LEASE AREA DESCRIPTION: NOTE O A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER, SECTION Z TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON. AND BEING A PORTION OF LOT 37, NORTH RGARDIIUE ADDITION. SAID TRACT IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS TM T FC10WS o u C H I R O COWffNCING AT THE WESTERN CORNER OF LOT 37, NORTH 71GARDNlJF ADDITION; THINNCE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERN LINE OF SAID LOT NORTH 4617'35' EAST, 0 4&24 FFEi,• THENCE PERPENDICULAR TO SAID UN& SOUTH 434215 EAST, 1500 FEET TO O THE TRUE POINT OF BECWNINC; THENCE CONTOANNCr SOUTH 434225' EAST 3500 FEET; e u ar o THENCE PARALLEL WIN SAID LINE, SOUTH 4617"35' WEST, 3500 FEET O THENCE PERPENDICULAR TO SAID UN& NORTH 4342'35' WEST, 3100 FEET (FORMERLY USWEST CELLULAR) THMCE PARALLEL WITH SAID LINE NORTH 161725- EAST, 3500 FEET TO THE O TRUE POWT OF BEGINNING; SAID TRACT CONTAINS 1.225 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS Q BEARINGS BASED ON THE OREGON STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1987, 10 NORTH ZONE SITE OWNER: SITE ADDRESS: e LEGAL DESCRIPTION Rosemarie Emery, Estate 12925 SW Pacific Hwy 12925 S.W. Pacific Hwy. Tigord, Oregon T1 TITLE SHEET . Tigard, Oregon CI SITE PLAN ZONING: C-G Al DETAILED SITE PLAN OCCUPANCY: B-4 A2 ELEVATIONS L1 LANDSCAPING PLAN CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V-N MMGER PORTLAND APPLICANT: 51 sci PARCEL _D PARCEL AREA CALCULATIONS: *OVERALL Total Area J6,551 epn 100R 1.225 eqH 100fi 5 AlrTouch Cellular 15575 S.W. Sequoia Ave. ^1 Area '020,8&,138 .qft 16R 240 sgff 20X Pared Area pfl 541L eqH Total Impervious Area 26,8253 sgft 74OX 24000 egft loxOx a SHEET INDEX Portland. OR 97224 OFFICE: 503-603-3991 Total Landscaped Area 9,043 egft 23R 0 egft ox New Landscaped area so 300'gft 191L INC. TRANSWORLD CONSORTIUM, GREENBURG '0 FAX: 503-603-3377 «? CALCULATED AT CONCLUSION "NEW PAR OUTSIDE OF LEASED 1 MAKE OSWEGO DESIGN BUILD ADA COMPLIANCE: Site Is unstaffed and noffndy unoccupied. t b. ooww"0, an aiae m LN TIGARD 3T w CONTRACTOR BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE PROJECT: S Tt CELL SITE CORD COMMUNICATIONS INC. 7160 S.W. FIR LOOP, SLUITE 102 W wPA farce and effect on the contract documents, tM prolecl may be summarized as: mbebn/receivh site for h t t l A abR A I R T o u t H- PORTLAND OREGON 97223 OFFICE: b03-598-0800 q oru ra s s ep rt e AIR TOUCH Cepuler, condatleq of an unoccupied radio p?wnend buildip, anbnms on (n) monopole, ' CeMar FAX: 503-598-0700 f«oup gravel paAdnq, electrical and telephone utility connections, all of which tae OO New be constructed at the alts. Man a ester. Pere." aor•eoe-0sn P012LA111% at rnN 001•e01-4e11 be DIRECTIONS FROM TIGARD/TUALATIN AREA LAND SURVEYOR' CELLULAR SITE TIGARD/99 Go SOUTH on l-5 to Hwy. 217. S Kohn" ? 1 Go WEST on Hwy. 217 approx. .5 miles to 99W (Pacific Hwy.). W&H PACIFIC INC. M U E TIGA RD O. OREGON Go SOUTH on Hwy. 99W approx. 2 miles to 12925 Pacific Hwy. SOUTH if d on the WEST side of Hw 99W t i l Sit 8405 SW NI B S AV . BEAVERTON, OR 97008 Property Owner big T= SHM y. , e oca e s Walnut et. eVICINITY MAP N.T.S. ePROJECT TEAM (5PROJECT SUMMARY e APPROVALS TWC PROJECT No- USn4-00x AKIOUCH CELLLAAA PPDJW Na: 1713197063 Sheet. T1 LI 1 1 TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING ACCESS/UTIUTY EASEMENT TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING LEASED PREMISES '® (N) ARTOUCH SEE DW. Al pFI / NIB73'28'W WALNUT 42.00' DELI-MART LAWN OPS-POINT 2 S56 41'43'W 5189RON ROO? , • / 127.19' ELEV.= 195\?`` AIC ASTRO PARKING \ GAS STATION y's LAWN 0 1 . ± / 11D Sow. /? ? y \ ^?ry?? -• l? " ( ``? In ?7 / 20 ACCESS/ / A/CPARKING. '{ . A/C UTILITY EASEMENT / PARKING ?p\ BRASS / a f SCREW Alblb ' PUN IS AREA :',? \ry6 ?0 ® :• ?* r? ?\ ?(? '1 I ,°•• ?n Js? / ' •\ ,/ ` IS' - APARTMENT ??c'?Y IV \ BUILDING g' '[,... y' v . . ; I; / / O ?0 w? ryroK ?cp s Sr OHER POLE IF698;1 \ 'd?0 Olt, 6Qo , 1? TOP 01D ??CJ 21% ? y OFFICE cp / %6 . eJ• f?b BUILDING AIC SIGN ; 1gti PAVEMENT ? WKING WDTH +/- 55 FT. ?? . \;/ , 4 / S POINT 1 LEGEND: \ 01 y?? 9? / N& 5R? 4? A CPS CONTROL POINT %;? / ?11 9 -ll 0 WATER METER / \ \ 1 ti??y ? o ` r y ry? ' Py ?1P / + UTILITY POLE / \ \ GOg ® CATCH BASIN 0l \ P{ /??G / 0 FOUND 518' IRON ROD /?vG??\G ` LUMNAIRE THERNiSE NOTED) 11 h \ / / rP ,? \ \ POWER POLE /7? J? I Q P / '® COORDINATE LIST FOR CENTER OF PROPOSED TOWER PROPOSED ANTENNA NA_D 83 GEODETIC COORDINATES A/C ASPHALTIC CONCRETE JOHN L SCOTT \ LATITUDE: 452536.001' N ' BUILDING \ OFFICE BUILDING LONGITUDE' 1224647.532' W \ / IYAD 17 GEODETIC COORDINATES? CONCRETE LATITUDE. LONGITUDE:- 122' 4 .586' N , LONGITUDE:- 122W 4643,181' W CONTOUR ?. NAD 83 STATE PLANE COORDINATES NORTHING. 649.908.70 St FT EDGE OI PAVEMENT ' / EASTINQ 7,616,861.22 SI FT LEASED PREMISES LINE ELEVATION AT BASE OF a_ FENCE \\ / ? TOWER - 1929' SCALE 25 50 100 SITE PLAN (FEET) 9GUL• I'aw SCALE 1'-50' WHEN PLOTTED ON 1107 Dab Daadpflon 1-2-91 In -.0 - waw w dwl rwmw Q 7-12-46jam Now am ,aatoa ® >'-1Mn aonaaNar ? m 7-29-99 P166 «..al not ® &-m-" aww mum ® 9-t-N P? ?amwda la /A 9-2hN mw NOTES O: O O O O O O 0 10 CONSORTWM, INC.I uo R PAM". IIa 9a-9n-atal wm aa.ga a tram m ""a"la A I RT o U C H- Ceuular Pacer =No WA M /I uaW PobV ?? 9aeam, a 9BM 90F90FaR 1?. TIGARD/99 CELLULAR SITE 12M 9t PodAe flOmm TIGARD, OREGON 911L PW1 rwe PROJECT W- Law-= Jmouw CnL" PRU= Na- 1111319MU I..Na C1 S43'42'25'E V / N46'17'35'E 10.00' 0\ TY EASEMENT P? I?tiO LEASED PREMISES DETAIL SCALE 1' a 30' 5 DECIDUOUS TREE LINE 7Z,, TOP ELEV. 224' f 24' PINE) LTOP ELEV. 258' : .r • 1 I ' APARTMENT BUILDING 1 1 1 `a 0 IELEV. ° PINE ??,,? TO 258' 'oor j / i j •` rte. ?:'?`' . iDECIDUOUS TREE LINE TOP ELEV. 224' TOWER BASE / ?? r (' / (E) CURB / ELEVATION +I 92'-9" EDGE OF TREE 200 sq" ft. i CANOPY 7' CHAINLINK FENCE 3 STRANDS OF BARBED i` WIRE W?TH SIGHT OBSCURRING % / / J\ SLATS / loolo- / / ; `; -... _•-- 6 M(N) ONOPOLE CUT UR8 (N) 12' 12e AND 16' DECIDUOUS TOP ELEV. 260' 14' FIR / TOP ELEV. 244' 0 GG?`?\O CL DETAILED SITE PLAN sruc r-W Date DewAptlon 1-14-w &J&W bwe Gr aired redo. cmdod e-:e-w e+w mm POO P' «WAMMM 6-26-94 boarporoke mw ?? 0 10 j (E) CURB ?:? !!i !!' {' ! (N) 12x20 !Ilii;!!;!!{:;!;,, AIRTOUCH ?? QUIP SHELTER (E) RETAINING ii:y ''?1!ir(P•{r!ai,'i! i'a{.I!l?iii i'ij; , WALL j ?? •ii1.2Q till!.;,iii;'_!.'I!{`;pii,,li?'.,d'I?iili? ?i'''t:'? • / N DSCAPING TRANSWORLD CONSORTIUM, INC. 175 s ft. - • ? sw ma rune, pe ew?ee-awe ---?'= -? ?.?.?... , 1 / take wule% as eeaw en ea-aw-elw (E) WN ? AIRTouCH' Cellular •- ® seen w eyrie rnan '' 1r N enlmd>a, OR etwl ' SCALE TIGARD/999 ? CEL SITE 14° DECIDUOUS Poom" O 'mo' OREGON TOP ELEV. 219' ! 0 5 10 20 ?? ? I ,`. E f ; OFFICE TNO rea= 110.: MOP-= (FEET) AAdoua1 CALL M vrnm No- 1713197053 BLDG. SCALE 1'-10' IF PLOTTED ON 11x17 aMe1 w, A 1 i _ ..1 j i ? -/ ')F U5 ?Fr 1-j! V is ,?,? i.i.'r, L./. '* `% .1,.n ..1•_.., i' R., D.I. /?'. ! ® 1-10-11 • ? ® 1-1-N ® 1-27-/ / ,%/ \ Clill 1 / v l % C . bra yt.; (:T )DETAILED SITE PLAN scut f.10' "K 1 ? r; 1 n i IECI1 01 pi `,\ \ / ! t i / 4" / i j C?I'i" r, P;L',1111 k 4i;'';G r-- i?ti 1 j-hEW LANDSCAPING (±375 S.F.) _(15) MED.-SIZE EVERGREEN SHRUBS, 5'-6' DIAMETER AND HT. SUCH--,,AS: • Rhododendron 'Sgintillotion' - 5 gol. • Toxus rmedio 'DOnsiformis' J ' (DENSIFORMIS ' YEW) - 5 gal. / • Thujo occi?erltalis i (AMERICAN ARBORVITAE) - 5 /0'0'1. ' SCALE 0 5 •10 20 i i (FEET) SCALE. 1'•IO' IF PLOTTED ON 1107 !TOTES O 0 0 0 : 0 : 0 0 : 0 DesertpNon r1o1n1 be fw dlwd Iwb. NA.d n to, eaw AN Pa•w .anm.nl, •aP•?d•• ....ury TRANSWORLD CONSORTIUM, INC.1 100 2 PAWF". #is 609-416'-0NI I LL 0ny.. as -10N to NMNI-ilN Ai RToucH- Cellular @. W-W auW/ tNR1 A rAal. hay ON-dow-e 1 PONUAM N f/N1 NI-NL•YR fts TIGARD/99 CELLULAR SITE 12125 SW Pmtlk AV co TIGARD. OREGON MAIM 10 Km M PRO= N0: usw _-= NRIOIIDI CEll" PRo EQ No- 1713117067 9. Ms L 1 '.n i-%? i ,?. • ? :7?'V':?,` ./ n. .h\i. ..IJ1ii _U??J??1??f1 rJ ?; / i/ !• \) ? `\ '\ \?,..-? /... vii k? 12 . 1 `.,, :r T0' 2 6 s • Date DescApffon 1-14-91 m lgl bow for o9wd rnMr rw4en 6-21-91 ClerfiW 9-4-94 Naror oo nnwnh (N) AIRTOUCH ANTENNAS (4 ANTENNAS ON 60' AZIMUTH SIDE) - TYP. (E) TREES BEYOND (TOP ELEV. 224) (N) 80' MONOPOLE - TYP. (N) AIRTOUCH ANTENNAS (4 ANTENNAS ON EACH OF 2 SIDES - 180' AND 240' AZIMUTHS) - TYP. (N) 12'x24' AIRTOUCH EQUIPMENT SHELTER - TYP. (N) ICEBRIDGE AND ICEBRIDGE SUPPORTS - TYP. (N) 7' CHAINLINK FENCE WITH 3 STRANDS OF BARBED WIRE AND SIGHT OBSCURING SLATS - TYP. 3'--12=-T- 33 i S.E. ELEVATION SCAM I/If=1' (1 olm KW,) 8' -I--17---8'---I 33' -- z N.E. ELEVATION stub 11If=1' 00" SW.) s N.W. ELEVATION Sma I/If=1' (10MW LL) -3' a S.W. ELEVATION scue 1/If=1' ( amm KL) SCALE 0 8 16 32 SCALE 1/16'-1 `IF P OTTEO ON 1107 NOTE 01 :ALL FENCING SWILL BE SIGHT OBSCURRING (SLATS). 0 to . TRANSWORLD CONSORTIUM, INC. 9@ loo ) PJJ9C71T. 910 9a9-aaam take o...po' a 970a fez ea-aft-9lw AiRToucH- Cellular ,... _.w, tall A Fart PY9p 009-400-SM /OMAID. 09 MW 909.101-498 an TIGARD/99 CELLULAR SITE 12925 SW P9dne W-0 TIGARD. OREGON DZVATKM Tw PROJECT W- UMV-4= AMC" CCU" PR&W RO: 1713197M ,. 90. A2 20 33' 33== ? r • 1 1 1 1 1 1 EXHIBIT D 1 Digital Photo Simulations (Will be submitted under separate cover) i 1 1 . 1 i 1 i 1 • image created by W&H PACIFIC©1996 After: Digitally enhanced photograph illustrating proposed 80 ft. cellular facility. Before: Existing conditions, looking northeast on Hwy. 99 towards proposed AirTouch cell site from the parking area of Capone's Cafe. A I R T o u C H Cellular Before: Existing conditions, looking northwest A I R T 0 U C H on Hwy. 99 towards proposed Cellular AirTouch cell site. • After: Digitally enhanced photograph illustrating proposed 80 ft. image created by W&H PACIHC©1996 cellular facility. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 • • Table of Contents VIII. ATTACHMENTS A. Authorization Letter from Property Owner B. Letter of Support from Property Owner C. Pre-Application Conference Notes 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i ATTACHMENT A Authorization Letter from Property Owner (Will be submitted under separate cover) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 Robert Kim, Trustee Estate of Rosemarie Emery 1360 SW Woodward Way Portland, OR 97225 (503) 378-2911 x 229 Christina Simon, Manager of Construction and Acquisition AIRTOUCH CELLULAR 15575 SW Sequoia Parkway Portland, OR 97229 RE: AirTouch Cellular Communication Facilities September 26, 1996 Dear Ms. Simon: This will authorize you to sign applications for landuse actions submitted to the City of Tigard as my agent. I understand that these planning and permitting documents are being prepared by W&H Pacific, Inc. for submittal to obtain necessary planning approvals and building permits for the development of cellular communication facilities at 12925 SW Pacific Highway. Robert Kim, Trustee of Estate of Rosemarie Emery 1 1 1 1 1 ATTACHMENT B Letter of Support from Property Owner ' 0 0 ATTACHMENT 8 11 n F1 Robert and Penney Kim, Trustees: Estate of Rosemarie Emery 1360 SW Woodward Way Portland, OR 97225 Owners: 12925 SW Pacific Hwy, Tigard, OR. 97223 Contact: David Kim (503) 378-2911 x 229 City of Tigard Planning Division Attn: Mark Roberts 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, OR. 97223 RE: AirTouch Cellular Communication Facilities October 10, 1996 To Whom It May Concern: We are writing to express our support of the proposed telecommunications facility to be located at 12925 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, OR. Due to the unique shape and placement of structures on our lot, we believe this to be a very accommodating space for this type of use. We have had several opportunities to discuss the project with AirTouch Cellular staff, and it is our opinion that they have done their utmost to locate and screen the tower and accessory structure as unobtrusively as possible. The placement of the tower near the existing trees will minimize its impact to both our property and the surrounding area. In addition, the proposed location of the structures is preferred over the empty lawn space in the NE corner of our lot because we hope to reserve that corner for future development. ' Sincerely, ' Robert and Penney Kim, Trustees of the Estate of Rosemarie Emery 1 1 1 1 0 0 ATTACHMENT C t t 11 u 1 lJ Pre-Application Conference Notes 1 DATE: STAFF: • • CITY OF TIGARD ATTACHMENT C CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES NON-RESIDENTIAL PLICANT: ?d c.A G.2 AGENT: 11 IM Ck 14 V;.57 z5mv-eli ? 'TO ? me: ( ) 211 Phone: OPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS: /,-'2 q Z S S w Pl"- 4C t? TAX MAPITAX LOT: Z 5 I yz r d"ak 7 el(l ECESSARY APPLICATION(S): La w h91,4sJ us.F w.P rW ) POSAL DESCRIPTION: MPREHENSIVE AN DESIGNATION: NING DESIGNATION: ITIZEN INVOLVEMENT EAM AREA: la-4uufe- 4,,;;, " ea+V,t I ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimu lot size: s rage lot Setbacks: front ft. de ?? k 1 Maxim m site coverage: % Minimum (Refer to Code S FACILITATOR: S.ee PHONE: (503) ?%u 46* t. Maximum buildi g height: 4 ft. corner 14 o ft. from street. or natural vegetat on area: 1-5' % r.e57)7,aw? _2_0t,,y OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes xidential applicaiiaNPlanning Department Section 1of8 )DITIONAL LOT DIMEN?IONAL REQUIREMENTS ' Minimum lot fr tage: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as art of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot ide access easement. t The depth of all lots hall not exceed 211 times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1;i times the minimu lot size of the applicable zoning district. (Refer to Code Section 1 .164.060 Lots) 'ECIAL SETBACKS n ? Streets: feet from the centerline of SW ae)lC t ? Established areas: feet from Lower intensity zones: feet, along the site's boundary. ? Flag lot: foot side yard setback. (Refer to Code Section and 18.96) . .' ...v' _. .. ,.... . .. ... ?_.. it 'ECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS "" - ?, Building Height Exceptions - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75' feet provided: ? A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ? All actual building setbacks will be at least '/s (half) of the building's height; and ? The structure will not abut a residential zone district. IRKING AND ACCESS - Required parking for this type of use: Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): (Refer to Code Section 18.98.020) Secondary use required parking: Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): Y "y Y. 14 1 t 4 ?i of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. No more thl Parking stalls shall be imensioned as follows: 7 Standard rking space dimensions: 8 ft. 8 inches X 18 ft. 7 Compact pa ing space dimensions: 8 ft. X 15 ft. (Refer to Code Section 18.10 .020) 7 Handicapped parkin All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and , dimensioned disabled %erson parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be pided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disa ilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A . ' handicapped parking space ymbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be pos d. 'f OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 hsidential applicationlPlanning Department Section Bicycle racks ad required for multi-family, commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shall be locate areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces sha be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. Minimum number of accesses: ©K Q k Minimum access width: ' Minimum pavement width: tti IA' C All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. ) Drive-in use queuing ar s: ' (Refer to Code Section 18.106 and 18.108) ALKWAY REQUIRE ENTS Walkways shall b?tend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevator of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access nd egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building com ercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed tween a new development and neighboring developments. I (Refer to Code Section 18\08.050) LADING AREA REQU EMENTS Every commercial r industrial building in excess of 10,000 square feet shall be provided with a loading space. The ace size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Section .106.070-090) LEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height a road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. er to Code Section 18.102) =t BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of ' width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings.,:. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code_.__ Th'e" required buffer areas may one be occupied by vegetation; fences, utilities, and walkwaysAdditional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Community Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.100) OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of B Residential apoicationmanning Department Section The required buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: ft. along north boundary. ft. along south boundary. t ft. along east boundary. t ft. along west boundary. 4n ;;d i4lan fight obscuring screening is required a;cmg abr uAd - f B f (A 0 QW.--. .NDSCAPING Street trees are required fo all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more tha 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private operty within six (6) . feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper f at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 0 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Furt err information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one (1) tree for every seven 7) parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas i er to provide a vegetative c opy effe a Inc u e special design features w Ic -elf c Ive y screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.100, 18.106 and 18.108) 3NS Sign permits mu be obtained prior to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for NSITIVE LAN The Code rvides regulations for lands which are potentially unsuitable for development due to areas within the 100-year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on, unstable ground. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-applicaton onference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely Sign (Refer to Permits" Code ha Sectout is 14) available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Altera Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. 1 1 t Y OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 Residential applicationlPlanning Oeparneni Section Chapter 18.84 a o provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. In most cases, dedication of 100- year floodplain area to the City for park and open space areas is required as a condition of the approval of a develop ent application. i (Refer to Code Section 1 .84) TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A tree pan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. The tree plan shall include the following: b Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; . c* Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: ? Retainage of less than 25 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070. D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; ? Retainage of from 50 to 75 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; ? Retainage of 75 percent or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; b Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and b A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.150.070.D. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.025) L 8 Y OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 esidential applicationmanning Department Section • • TIGATION Replacement of a tree shall take place according to the following guidelines: ? A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ? If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ? If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ? The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. In lieu of tree replacement under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.070 (D) aR_ R VE ' The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Section 18.32) )DE SECTIONS , _ 18.80 .18.92 11 .?04 _ 18.108 18.150 _ 2120 r 18.84 _ 18.96 1 02_L 18.114 _ ` 18.130 18.160 _ 18.88 _ 18.98 18.106._ _ _ 18.116 _ 18.134 _"_18 162 t .18.164T AGHBORHOOD MEETING The applicant shall notify all property owners withi n 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and the members of any land use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. 'i 'f OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 ' Residential applicationiPlannmg Department Section I RECYCLING Applicant should con Pride Disposal's vehicl ?J 0 franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. I (Refer to Code Section 18.1,V) IDDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: Is 6jul5 eloWe )L?a+--%q?c :5"fe- be dest, u0j, +0' -0 ((ow _-i- C _QJOCa` 4&1 . w A ©f? f - Gel ufav-- 7 Will . [_ rid U't U?tu,v11 CaV lofts peavdtk?5 ;,A o-jX.,- V,-d Voi l 60VI s4vt k &L "ti!.& in [Q PV A or- t4 e- ::;*6 CA4,e--, J?, w INt ; ize V 1C, ea cI yt aC '?Vo yj kin N 'V?QS??e?c??a,l a v Qa5 15 ??'2 u`>re •?n 5 'p.5 ?IDv?a C?/G(Jl?K S?aw+G'?-7' 0.- V aV i ate, VA"iA oyOulde- av YJ f r ¦ aF4?,2 <'. ePIgw- 1OCEDURE administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. OPPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All a-polications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community Dev-?opment Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail o¢ -;pped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned Applications subritted after 4:30 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week's applications. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3.00 P.M. on Fridays or 4.30 on other days Y OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 -Residential appocanomPlanning Department Section ishall hp fnlrfntf IN nnvamr;: to A c; u 11 in-hoc fIno 0 R ini•h by 11 inch ma of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted, The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will-determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20 day public appeal period follows, all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard 6 o U H U . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is availa a from the Planning Division upon request. This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. Additional pre-application conference(s) is;are required if an application(s) islare to be submitted more than six months following this pre-application conference, unless the additional conference(s) is deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division. PREPARED BY: 2%d4? 44d__ CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 gimpatty\masterslpreapp-C.mst :ineering Section: rasters\preapp-c.eng) Y OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 Residential applicationlPlanning Department Section • CITY OF TIGARD 0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST CITY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This. sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: VK Date: Z?5' 11APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE V MARKED ITEMS A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner's signature/written authorization C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed D) Applicant's statement ,h?• E) Filing Fee - ?' SITE-SPECIFIC MAP(S)/PLA:v(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS No. of Copies '$ IBIS CLUIDE Z MARKED ITEMS A) Site Information showine: No. of Copies Id 1. Vicinity map ' 2. Site size & dimensions low 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) ? 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds ? ' 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: ? (a) Floodplain areas ? (b) Slopes in excess of 25% (c) Unstable ;round ? ? (d) Areas with high seasonal water table ? (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential ? ' (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils ? 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Pvtap Inventory including: ? (a) Wildlife habitats ? (b) Wetlands ? 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings ? (b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level ? 8. Location of existing structures and their uses ` !gam 9: y Location and type of on and off-site noise sources ? J.O: Location`o_5ezisfing:utilities.and easements L t? 11 Locaiiori of existirig'dedicated right-of-ways J / 1 L-kND USE APPLIC-kTION / LIST PAGE 1 OF 3 8) Site Develoament Plan Inicatine: N •f Copies 11?1 1. The proposed site and surrounding properties m? 2. Contour line intervals ? 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties ? (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site ? (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension ? 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site (b) Parking and circulation areas (c) Loading and services area ? (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ? (e) Outdoor common areas ? (f) Above ground utilities., -- -' ? ., - .. ? ? ? 5.-'-' The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: ..J- (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and t . easements which are located on the site and on adjacent tgv?4?rr'.srv? " +:,a4t t:.,,, ., .y ? .a-..... t a .: •?{¢ ._. property within 25 feet: of-thert site (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ? 7. Sanitary sewer facilities ' ? 1 8. The location areas to be landscaped. 01--1 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques .? 10. The location of mailboxes ? X11:'°` The location of all structures and their orientation t? 12' Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ? C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1. The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lines ? (b) Slope ratios ? (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) ? (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development ? 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report ? (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service-proposals ? (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated C3 LAND USE APPLICATION / LIST P.SG"c 2 OF 3 D) Architectural Dra s Indicatin : No. of Copies Th l h ll i l l l 0 - s a nc an proposa e site deve op p ude: 1: Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicatin: No. of Copies The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1. Description of the. irrigation system, where applicable 2. Location and height 'of fences, buffer-and screenings: 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ? 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materi als ? 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions ? (b) Erosion control measures that will be used ? F) Sin Dra in s• ? Sign drawin s shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Per it to construct a sign. G) Traffic Genera'twn Estimate: ? H) Prelimina Partition/Lot Line Ad'ustment Ma Indicatin : No. of Copies 1. The own r of the subject parcel ? 2. The owner authorized agent ? 3. The map sc a (20,50,100 or 200 feet-1) inch north arrow and date ? 4. Description o arcel location and boundaries ? 5. Location, width nd names of streets, easements and other public ways within and jacent to the parcel ? 6. Location of all perm nent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines ? 7. Location and width of II water courses ? ' 8. Location of any trees wi in 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level ? 9. All slopes greater than 251,10 ? 10. 11. Location of existing utilities a d utility easements For major land partition which reates a public street: ? (a) The proposed right-of-way cation and width ? (b) A scaled cross-section of the roposed street plus any reserve strip ? 12. Any applicable deed restrictions ? 13. Evidence that land partition will not pr lude efficient future land division where applicable ? ' LaVD USE APPL!C1TION V LIST PAGE 3 OF 3 Subdivision Prelim- a Ma and Data Indicatin : Nq4bf Copies 1. Scale equaling 50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet ? 2. The proposed nam of the subdivision ? 3. Vicinity map show- property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ? 4. Names, addresses and elephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer and esigner (as applicable) ? 5. Date of application ? 6. Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided ? 7. Names of adjacent subdivi ion or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-sub ivided land ? 8. Contour lines related to a Ci -established benchmark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater than 10% ? 9. The purpose, location, type an size of all the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): (a) Public and private right-of- ays and easements ? (b) Public and private sanitary a d storm sewer lines ? (c) Domestic water mains includ g fire hydrants ? (d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ? (e) Watercourses ? (f) Deed reservations for parks, ope spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ? 10. Approximate plan and profiles of propo d sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on t e plans ? 11. Plan of the proposed water distribution sy tem, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants ? 12. Approximate centerline profiles showing th finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable istance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ? 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed street right f-way(s) ? 14. The location of all areas subject to inundatio or storm water overflow ? 15. Location, width & direction of flow of all wat courses & drainage-ways ? 16. The proposed lot configurations, approximate I t dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for pu poses other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots. ? 17. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inch or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of p posed tree plantings ? 18. The existing uses of the property, including the I cation of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a state ent of which structures are to remain after platting ? 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ? (b) Proof of property ownership ` ? (c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision i provements l ? 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wet ands & marsh areas ? 21. If any of the foregoing information cannot practicabl be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narra ive and submitted with the application c LAND USE APPLICATION J LIST PACE 4 OF 3 n a 1 V h:,Jogin\caM,a,masters\Itk l ist.,nst Ntav 23. 1995 ' LkNO USE APPLICATION J LIST PACE 5 OF 5