Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Hearings Officer Packet - 08/21/2006
9900 R, 10 HEARINGS OFFICER MONDAY - AUGUST 21, 2006 - 7:00 PM Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Hearings Officer meetings by noon on the Friday prior to the meeting. Please call 503-639-4171, Ext. 2438 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments and qualified bilingual interpreters. Since thege services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. To request such services, please notify the City of Tigard of your need(s) by 5:00 p.m., no less than one (1) week prior to the meeting date at the same phone numbers listed above so that we can make the appropriate arrangements. Hearings are held in Town Hall at the City of Tigard at 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Staff reports are available to the public 7 days prior to the hearing date 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC HEARING 2.1 M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2006-00002 ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2006-00069 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit to allow the M.I.T.C.H. Charter School to occupy classroom space in the Calvin Presbyterian Church. M.I.T.C.H. is K-8 and has approximately 198 students. The school will lease the lower level of the church, which has 8 classrooms and a commons area. The school will also have access to a fenced playground on site. The applicant does not propose any changes to the church exterior or site. In addition, the applicant requests an Adjustment to the bicycle parking standard of 6 spaces per classroom. The applicant desires to reduce the required number of bicycle parking spaces from 48 to 6. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; Washington County Tax Map 2S111BC, Tax Lot 2800. ZONE: R-3.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. 3. OTHER BUSINESS 4. ADJOURNMENT Page 1 of 1 Depending on the number of people wishing to testify, the Tigard Hearing's Officer may limit the amount of time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Hearing's Officer may further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Hearing's Officer to supplement oral testimony. AGENDA ITEM NO.: 2.1 DATE: AUGUST 21, 2006 PAGE 1 OFJ FILE NAME: M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL CASE NOS.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2006-00002 ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2006-00069 IF YOU WISH TO TESTIFY ON THE ITEM INDICATED ABOVE, PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME, ADDRESS & INCLUDE YOUR ZIP CODE PROPONENT - (Speaking In Favor or Neutral) OPPONENT - (Speaking Against) Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. 1 Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. /3 f' St' V f(~ev7~77~1 ~y 1 /.5-z _ ` ~ 0 k 9724 - S"o3 ~(ob',7~voZ - - - - Nar ei 0, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. I Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. - N me, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. -I Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. ~ D(Wx-tor- 5D3 639- - - - - Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. I Na- me, Address, Zip Code and Phone No- . 1 I Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. I Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. 1 I - - - - - - - - - - - - - Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. 1 Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -I- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 I 0 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS 6605 SE Lake Road, Portland, OR 97222 • PO Box 22109 • Portland, OR 97269 Phone: 503-684-0360 Fax: 503-620-3433 Email: legals@commnewspapers.com AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION State of Oregon, County of Washington, SS I, Charlotte Allsop, being the first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Accounting Manager of The Times (serving Tigard, Tualatin & Sherwood), a newspaper of general circulation, published at Beaverton, in the aforesaid county and state, as defined by ORS 193.010 and 193.020, that City of Tigard Public Hearing Item TT10841 a copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for 1 successive and consecutive weeks in the following issues August 3, 2006 C KO-V 10A 0jA'1j_-'_P Charlotte Allsop (Accounting Manager) Subscribed and sworn to before me this August 3, 2006 NOTAR PUBLIC FOR OREGON a My commission expires ~1 C)V . a$ 1 D-W - 7 Acct #10093001 Patricia Lunsford City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 OFFIC SUZETTE 00 NOTARY PU COMMISSI( MY COMMISSION D(PII Size:2 x 13 Amount Due $217.10 'Remit to address above PUBLIEARING ITEM The following will be con ered by the Tigard Hearings Officer on Mondav August 21. 2006 at 7:00 PM at the Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. Both public oral and written testimony is invited. The public hearing'on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the Tigard Municipal Code and the rules of procedure adopt- ed by the Council and available at City Hall or the rules of proce- dure set forth in Chapter 18.390. Testimony may be submitted in writing prior to or at the public hearing or verbally at the public hearing only. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior to the close of the hearing accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to afford the decision-maker an opportunity to respond to the issue precludes appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeal based on that issue. Failure to specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that cri- terion. A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submit- ted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven (7) days prior to the hearing, and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division (staff contact: Emily Eng) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, by calling 503-639-4171, or by e-mail to E milvr&..tigard-or. gov. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2006-00002/ADJUST- MENT (VAR) 2006-00069 -M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL- REQUEST: THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL TO OCCUPY CLASSROOM SPACE IN THE CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. M.I.T.C.H. IS K-8 AND HAS APPROXIMATELY 198 STUDENTS. THE SCHOOL WILL LEASE THE LOWER LEVEL OF THE CHURCH, WHICH HAS 8 CLASSROOMS AND A COMMONS AREA. THE SCHOOL WILL ALSO HAVE ACCESS TO A FENCED PLAYGROUND ON SITE. THE APPLICANT DOES NOT PRO- POSE ANY CHANGES TO THE CHURCH EXTERIOR OR SITE. IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT REQUESTS AN ADJUSTMENT TO THE BICYCLE PARKING STANDARD OF 6 SPACES PER CLASSROOM. THE APPLICANT DESIRES TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES FROM 48 TO 6. LOCATION: 10445 SW CANTERBURY LANE; WASHINGTON COUNTY TAX MAP . 2S111BC, TAX LOT 2800. ZONE: R-3.5: LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. THE R-3.5 ZONING DISTRICT IS DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE DETACHED SINGLE- FAMILY HOMES WITH OR WITHOUT ACCESSORY RESI- DENTIAL UNITS AT A MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET. DUPLEXES ARE PERMITTED CONDITION- ALLY. SOME CIVIC AND INSTITUTIONAL USES ARE ALSO PERMITTED CONDITIONALLY. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTERS: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, .18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, AND 18.810. Juf 0 0 _r 11 I CUP2006-00002 -r, ILJ- V.1R2006-00069 CHARTER \ SCHOOL 111 I vw.~ninue+w~f ~ nw ass .a... euaµ~~NUU »w PUBLISH 8/3/2006 TT10841A BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by MITCH Charter School ) FINAL ORDER for a conditional use permit and adjustment for a K-7 ) CUP2006-00002 charter school in a church at 10445 SW Canterbury ) VAR2006-00069 Lane in the R-3.5 zone in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) (MITCH Charter School) A. SUMMARY 1. Debi Lorence filed the application for MITCH Charter School (the "applicant"). She requests approval of a conditional use permit to operate a charter school for up to 160 students in kindergarten through 7`n grade. The school will be conducted in an existing building on the grounds of Calvin Presbyterian Church at 10445 SW Canterbury Lane, which occupies the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Canterbury Lane and 103`d Avenue (tax lot 2800, WCTM 2S111BC (the "site"). The site contains about 3.53 acres and is zoned R-3.5. The Staff Report to the Hearings Officer dated August 5, 2002 (the "Staff Report") contains a history of City review and development on the site, which the hearings officer incorporates as his own. The applicant does not propose to enlarge the building or to add parking or to undertake other significant development to accommodate the proposed charter school. The applicant requests approval of an adjustment to the minimum bicycle parking space standard to reduce the number of spaces required from 48 to 6. 2. Tigard Hearings Officer Joe Turner (the "hearings officer") conducted a duly noticed public hearing to receive testimony and evidence in the matter. At the public hearing, City staff recommended conditional approval of the application. Representatives of the applicant and the church testified in support of the application. Other than service providers, no one testified orally or in writing. The hearings officer closed the public record at the end of the hearing. There were no disputed issues in this case. 3. The hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof for a conditional use permit and adjustment to the bicycle parking space standard, based on the findings and conclusions included and incorporated herein and subject to conditions at the end of this final order. B. HEARING AND RECORD 1. The hearings officer held a duly noticed public hearing on August 21, 2006 to receive and consider public testimony in this matter. The record includes a witness list, materials in the casefile as of the close of the record, including materials submitted after the hearing, and an audio record of the hearing. At the beginning of the hearing, the hearings officer made the declaration required by ORS 197.763. The hearings officer disclaimed any ex parte contacts, bias or conflicts of interest. The following is a summary by the hearings officer of selected relevant testimony offered at the hearing. 2. City planner Emily Eng summarized the Staff Report. 3. Lee Weislogel appeared for the applicant and accepted the findings and recommended conditions in the Staff Report. He requested the hearings officer modify condition 2 to note that schools are partially exempt from the noise standards of the Tigard Municipal Code ("TMC"). The applicant does not intend to generate amplified noise on the site. He waived the applicant's right to submit a final argument. 4. City Planning Director Dick Bewersdorff noted that the noise exemption for schools does not apply to amplified sounds or noise in excess of 85 dB. 5. Kay Smith testified on behalf of the Calvin Presbyterian Church, the property owner. She testified that the church supports the application and is looking forward to working with the applicant. 6. Debi Lawrence, the founder and director of the MITCH Charter School testified in support of the application. 7. At the end of the hearing, the hearings officer closed the public record and announced his intention to approve the application subject to recommended conditions in the Staff Report. C. DISCUSSION 1. The Staff Report identifies the applicable approval criteria for the application and applies them to the record in the case. The hearings officer agrees that the standards identified in the Staff Report are applicable and finds that they are correctly applied to the facts of the case in the Staff Report. Substantial evidence in the record shows that the proposed use does or can comply with the applicable approval criteria for a CUP, and adoption of recommended conditions of approval as amended will ensure final plans are submitted and implemented as approved consistent with those criteria and standards and will prevent, reduce or mitigate potential adverse impacts of the development consistent with the requirements of the CDC. The findings in the Staff Report also describe why the applicant adjustment to the bicycle parking standards requested by the applicant complies with applicable standards and why the adjustment is supported by substantial evidence in the record. The hearings officer adopts the findings and conclusions in the Staff Report as his own. 2. Proposed condition of approval 2 in the Staff Report provides: The applicant is hereby notified that generating noise in excess of 50 dBA may result in complaints requiring alteration of activities. The applicant shall certify that the proposed use will not generate noise in excess of the standards specified in the Tigard Municipal Code, Chapter 7.40.160. CUP2006-00002 and VAR2006-00069 Hearings Officer Final Order (MITCH Charter School) Page 2 • Section 7.40.160 of the Tigard Municipal Code "TMC") prohibits noise in excess of 50 dB at any time between seven a.m. and nine p.m. the same day.' However TMC 7.40.180.A provides an exemption for: Non-amplified sounds created by organized athletic or other group activities, when such activities are conducted on property generally used [as a] school... during normal hours for such events. The applicant proposed to operate a school on the site. Therefore activities on the site are subject to the exemption of TMC 7.40.180.A. However TMC7.40.190 prohibits noise in excess of 85 dB for more than 5 minutes in any calendar day, regardless of the exemptions. The examiner finds that condition of approval 2 should be modified to reflect the noise regulations that apply to the proposed school. D. CONCLUSIONS Based on the findings and discussion provided or incorporated in this final order, the hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof that the proposed conditional use permit and adjustment do or will comply with the applicable criteria of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to ensure such compliance occurs in fact. E. DECISION In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the hearings officer hereby approves CUP2006-00002 and VAR2006-00069 (MITCH Charter School), subject to the following conditions of approval: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Current Planning Division (Emily Eng, (503) 718-2712) for review and approval: 1. The applicant shall provide a 6-stall bicycle rack in addition to the existing onsite bicycle rack that is not within parking aisles, required landscaping or pedestrian w ays. A revised plan will be required showing the location and specific design and location of the required bicycle rack in accordance with standards in Section 18.765.050.A through D of the code. 2. The applicant is hereby notified that activities on the site are subject to the noise limitations of Article IV of Section 7.40 of the Tigard Municipal Code. The applicant shall certify that the proposed use will not generate noise in excess of the standards specified in this section of the Tigard Municipal Code. 'The maximum noise level is reduced to 40 dB between nine p.m. and seven a.m. the following day. CUP2006-00002 and VAR2006-00069 Hearings Officer Final Order (MITCH Charter School) Page 3 3. The applicant shall obtain a sign permit prior to erecting a si on the site. The subject sign shall comply with the sign code (Chapter 17.7807 4. Based on staff observation of the water quality facilities, staff suggests that the applicant work with the property owner to replant the water quality facilities and implement a maintenance plan to mitigate the impacts of not only additional vehicle trips, but current trips. Note: This is a recommendation and not a condition of approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Building Department (Brian Blalock, (503) 718-2436) for review and approval: 5. The applicant is required to obtain a building permit for the change of use/occupancy. The applicant shall submit a revised interior floor plan that shows which rooms will be used as classrooms. THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Engineering Department (Bethany Stewart, (503) 718-2436) for review and approval: 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee if using an address other than the existing address of the proposed site. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, (503) 718-2642) for review and approval: 7. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall trim the trees and bushes specified in the Traffic Analysis report in order to improve sight distance. 8. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for the three access points. 9. Staff suggests that additional right-of-way be dedicated to the Public along the f rontage of 103rd Avenue to increase the right-of--way to 27 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. Note: This is recommendation and not a condition of approval. THIS APPROVAL MUST BE IMPLEMENTED WITHIN 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. DATED this 23rd day of August 2006. jl~ 4... Joe Turner, Esq., AICP City of Tigard Land Use Hearings Officer CUP2006-00002 and VAR2006-00069 Hearings Officer Final Order (MITCH Charter School) Page 4 11 CITY ol , ~,OH GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM • ;l I I VICINITY MAP L-P~- m 46UALTERR_ I, I CANTERBURY Ld I I-L' E-i--) MURDOCK ST 1 Ell e e e E~j J I DELMONTE DR „ommunity Development I MURUVIrf D CLTP2006-00002 VAR2006-00069 MIT.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL BEEF BENO RO. . . •'1 Tigard Area Map N 0 100 200 300 400 Feet 1'= 311 feel _ v C Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 6394171 hWhvv w.cl.tigard.or.us Plot date: Jul 27, 2006; C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR - t r A'. t aA ° 46 AN. f' I I ~ t i H'l { ~ II CE' F. t (Art \ Z _ = I I 12 ' ~ `may' 6 ~i`6 I I a_ ~011 I . •il t Presbvterion Church Robert u 10445 S.W. Canterbury Lane. Tigard, Oregon 9'7224-4811 • i "TAB B" Applicant's Materials & All Correspondence Filed with Hearings Officer Prior to the Public Hearing. Agenda Item: 2.1 Hearing Date: 8.21.2006 Time: 7:00 PM r STAFF REPORT TO THE a HEARING'S OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 4a~pQ~ 120 DAYS = 12/2/2006 REVISED STAFF REPORT: Revisions are indicated in vellow hi hg light SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL CASE NOS: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) CUP2006-00002 Adjustment (VAR) VAR2006-00069 APPLICANT: M.I.T.C.H. Charter School OWNER: Calvin Presbyterian Church Attn: Debi Lorence 10445 SW Canterbury Lane PO Box 230575 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 APPLICANT'S REP: Ed Murphy Parad - LDC Design Group 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro, OR 97124 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow the M.I.T.C.H. Charter School to operate on the Calvin Presbyterian Church site. The 3.53-acre site includes classrooms, a multi-use area and an outdoor playground that will accommodate the K-7 school. The applicant does not propose any changes to the church exterior or site. In addition, the applicant requests an adjustment to reduce the required number of bicycle parking spaces from 48 to 6. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; WCTM 2S111BC, Tax Lot 2800. ZONING: R-3.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Hearings Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City and meets the Approval Standards for a Conditional Use. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the following recommended Conditions of Approval: M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 1 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HERRINGS OFFICER 0 • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Current Planning Division (Emily Eng, (503) 718-2712) for review and approval: 1. The applicant shall provide a 6-stall bicycle rack in addition to the existing onsite bicycle rack that is not within parking aisles, required landscaping or pedestrian ways. A revised plan will be required showing the location and specific design and location of the required bicycle rack in accordance with standards in Section 18.765.050.A through D of the code. 2. The applicant is hereby notified that generating noise in excess of 50 dBA may result in complaints requir ng alteration of activities. The applicant shall certify that the proposed use will not generate noise in excess of the standards specified in the Tigard Municipal Code, Chapter 7.40.160. 3. The applicant shall obtain a sign permit prior to erecting a sign on the site. The subject sign shall comply with the sign code (Chapter 17.780). 4. Based on staff observation of the water quality facilities, staff suggests that the applicant work with the property owner to replant the water quality facilities and implement a maintenance plan to mitigate the impacts of not only additional vehicle trips, but current trips. Note: This is a recommendation and not a condition of approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Building Department (Brian Blalock, (503) 718-2436) for review and approval: The applicant is required to obtain a building permit for the change of use/occupancy. The applicant shall submit a revised interior floor plan that shows which rooms will be used as classrooms. THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Engineering Department (Bethany Stewart, (503) 718-2436) for review and approval: 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee if using an address other than the existing address of the proposed site. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, (503) 718-2642) for review and approval: 7. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall trim the trees and bushes specified in the Traffic Analysis report in order to improve sight distance. 8. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for the three access points. 9. Staff suggests that additional right-of-way be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of 103rd Avenue to increase the right-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. Note: This is recommendation and not a condition of approval. THIS APPROVAL MUST BE IMPLEMENTED WITHIN 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S REPORT. M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 2 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 0 0 SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Proposal Descrintion: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow the M.I.T.C.H. Charter School to occupy the Calvin Presbyterian Church site. The school offers K-7, has 160 students, and will have 12 teachers and 2 support staff. The school proposes to use the lower level of the church, which includes classrooms, a multi- use area, as well as the existing fenced playground on site. The applicant does not propose any changes to the church exterior or site. The property owner will modify the lower level of the building to provide 8 classrooms total (currently, there are 6 classrooms and additional space that can be converted to 2 classrooms). In addition, the applicant requests an adjustment to reduce the required number of bicycle parking spaces from 48 to 6. Site and Vicinity Information: The 3.53-acre site is located on the NW corner of SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103`d Avenue. Adjacent uses include: single-family homes to the north; a parking lot (used and owned by the Calvin Presbyterian Church) and single-family homes across the street to the east; the John Tigard House and Tigard Water District property to the south; and multi-family housing to the west. The site is in an R-3.5 zone, is adjacent to an R-12 zone to the west and has a slope of approximately 3 per cent. Site History: The Calvin Presbyterian Church was first built on the existing site in 1965. The church made significant expansions in 1992, 1994 and 2000. In 1992, the City approved the construction of a new narthex, fellowship and classroom building containing approximately 5,115 square feet (CUP92-00001). In 1994, the City ap roved the construction of a 9,700-square foot sanctuary (CUP94-00004). In 2000, the City. approved a 6,670-square foot two-story addition to use as classroom space (CUP2000-00002). In addition, the church acquired property across the street from the site on the corner of SW 103`d Avenue and Inez Street, which the City approved for a parking lot (CUP2001-00002). Concerns Raised by Neighbors: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on July 27, 2006 at 7:00 PM, as documented in the meeting minutes provided with this application (Exhibit 10). All property owners within 500 feet of the subject site were invited. Twelve residents attended the meeting and none had objections to the proposal. Topics discussed include: number of students, where students come from, traffic impacts, school curriculum, recess, special needs students, use of interior space and liability. SECTION IV. REPORT MAKING PROCEDURES. PERMITS AND USE Use Classification Section 18.130.020 lists the Use Categories. The Calvin Presbyterian Church and M.I.T.C.H. Charter School are different uses within the civic use type. Specifically, the Church is classified as a religious institution and M.I.T.C.H. is classified as a school. Therefore, a change of use will occur if the charter school becomes a tenant of the church site, resulting in a major modification to a conditional use. Summarv of Land Use Permits and Decision-makin_a Procedures Section 18.330.020.B.3 states that, upon the Director determining that the proposed modification to the conditional use plan is a major modification, the applicant shall submit a new application in accordance with Section 18.390.050 (Type III-HO procedure). Type III-HO procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that predominantly contain discretionary approval criteria. Type III-HO actions are decided by the Hearings Officer with appeals being heard by the City Council. The applicant is also requesting reduction in the required bicycle parking by means of an adjustment, which is processed as a Type II procedure. Staff has recommended a decision to be considered by the Hearings Officer. M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 3 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER SECTION V. SUMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERI91 Staff has reviewed the proposal for consistency with the following code sections. Section is in Section VI of this report. A. Zoning Districts 18.510 - Residential Zoning Districts B. Impact Study 18.390 C. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.330 - Conditional Use 18.360 - Site Development Review 18.370 - Variances and Adjustments 18.705 - Access Egress and Circulation 18.725 - Environmental Performance Standards 18.745 - Landscaping and Screening 18.755 - Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage 18.765 - Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements 18.795 - Visual Clearance 18.810 - Street and Utility Improvement Standards SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. ZONING DISTRICTS Chanter 18.510 - Residential Zoning Districts Lists the description of the residential Zoning District. The proposed site is in an R-3.5 zone, a low-density residential district designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. The proposed use (school) is permitted conditionally in the R-3.5 zone. B. IMPACT STUDY Section 18.390.040.B.2.e: Impact study. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirements, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Little impact is expected on the following systems: parks, water, sewer and lighting. The applicant does not propose any changes to alter these systems or significantly impact them. The proposed use does increase traffic to and from the site. The applicant provided a traffic study, based on a conservative estimate of the school's population (K-8, 198 students). The traffic study (Exhibit 13) shows that the school will generate approximately 174 vehicle trips during the morning and 129 trips during the mid-afternoon peak hour of the school. While the morning peak hour of the school coincides with the general morning eak hour of traffic (7:15 AM to 8:15 AM), the mid-afternoon peak hour of the school 1(3:00 PM to 4:00M) does not coincide with the general evening commuter traffic (4:45 PM to 5:45 PM). The traffic study concludes that the study area intersections will continue to operate at a Level of Service (LOS) B or better during weekday peak hours. The study area intersections include SW M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 4 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Canterbury Lane and SW 103`dfenue and SW Inez Street and SW 103AVenue The proposal does not impact the drainage system in that the applicant is not increasing runoff by increasing impervious surface area. Therefore, the addition of the school does not cause the need for additional detention. However, the increase in vehicle trips, as discussed above, may impact water quality by adding pollutants to the current level of storm water runoff. While the applicant does not address impacts to storm water duality, staff visited the site and observed that the two on-site water-quality facilities are in poor condition and provide no water quality treatment due to the lack of plantings. No improvements are required; however, staff suggests that the applicant work with the property owner to replant the water quality facilities and implement a maintenance plan to mitigate the impacts of not only additional vehicle trips, but current trips. Some noise impact is expected from the playground during the week. The playground is located on the north side of the school and is separated from adjacent single family homes by a driveway, 6-foot high fence and a 16 to 20-foot landscape buffer. Some noise in the morning and afternoon is also expected, as students arrive and leave. FINDING: The proposed use will not generate significant impacts. RECOMMENDATION: Staff suggests that the applicant work with the property owner to replant the water quality facilities and implement a maintenance plan to mittgate the impacts of not only additional vehicle trips, but current trips. This is a recommendation and not a condition of approval. C. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Chanter 18.330 - Conditional Use Section 18.330.010.A: Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and section. The proposed use (school) requires a conditional use permit in a residential zone. The applicant is requesting approval of a major modification of the Calvin Presbyterian Church site to allow the school to use the site. Section 18.330.030: Approval Standards for a Conditional Use. The Hearings Officer shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a conditional use or to enlarge or alter a conditional use based on findings of fact with respect to each of the following criteria: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; The M.I.T.C.H. Charter School is K-7, has an enrollment of 160 students, and will have 12 teachers and 3 support staff. The Calvin Presbysterian Church is fully developed, including a multi-use room, a playground, space for 8 classrooms, parking, lighting and landscaping. The necessary services and infrastructure are available (electric, natural gas, cable, garbage disposal, streets, sewer, storm drainage, and water). The size and dimensions of the Calvin Presbyterian Church site are adequate for the needs of a school. However, it is not clear from the floor plan (Exhibit 7) that the lower level of the church can accommodate 8 classes. The floor plan shows 6 rooms labeled "classrooms." There are also 4 rooms in the space labeled "Existing Canton Hall." Per email from the applicant, the property owner will be remodeling the area labeled "Existing Canton Hall" to provide 2 additional classrooms. Prior to receiving building permit(s) to occupy the site, the applicant shall submit a site plan that shows which rooms will be used as classrooms. FINDING: The proposed site is adequate for the needs of the school. However, it is not clear from the floor plan (Exhibit 7) that the lower level of the church can accommodate 8 classes. Criterion #1 will be met when the condition below is satisfied. M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 5 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • CONDITION: Prior to receiving building permit(s), the applicant shall submit a revised interior floor plan that shows which rooms will be used as classrooms. 2. The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography and natural features; The school will be a secondary use within the already developed church site and the applicant does not propose any exterior changes. Expected impacts will be minor. There will be some noise impact during recess. The trees and shrubs in the 16 to 20-foot landscaping strip along the north boundary of the site will buffer and screen the adjacent properties from playground activity and noise. Traffic will be the most significant impact. According to the traffic study (Exhibit 13), as previously discussed in this report, the school will generate approximately 174 vehicle trips during the morning and 129 trips during the mid-afternoon peak hour of the school. The traffic engineer concluded, based on the full analyses described in the traffic study, that the charter school can be operated on the church site without adversely affecting traffic operations or safety near the site. Key intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable Level of Service with the school's maximum enrollment. The internal circulation system serves the site well, with driveways set far enough back from adjacent intersections to avoid potential traffic conflicts. In addition, employee and school-related parking can be accommodated by the existing parking lot. The traffic engineer observes that some of the existing landscaping is affecting sight distance from the two main driveways. However, the required site distance can be met and even exceeded by trimming some of the existing trees and bushes. The applicant shall be required to trim the trees and bushes specified in the Traffic Section report in order to improve sight distance. The applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for the three access points. FINDING: The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shappe, location, topography and natural features. However, site distance is somewhat obstructedhy overgrown bushes and trees. Because traffic will be the most significant impact, the applicant shall satisfy the conditions below to ensure that the site can accommodate the increased traffic flow. CONDITIONS: Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall trim the trees and bushes specified in the Traffic Section report in order to improve sight distance. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for the three access points. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; and The site is fully developed and in an area that is fully developed. The applicant does not propose any changes that would require improvements to public facilities. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the school, as shown below: Streets: The site is served by SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103rd Street. Both streets are fully improved and as concluded from the traffic study (Exhibit 13), have adequate capacity to serve the school. However, the applicant is encouraged to dedicate an additional Ir- 2 feet of ROW on SW 103`d Avenue (as discussed on in e Site Development Review (Chapter 18.360) section of this report). Water: The site already receives water service and the applicant does not propose any changes to the existing water service. Therefore, while water usage may be increase somewhat, there is adequate capacity to serve the proposed use. Sanitarv Sewer: The site is already connected to the sanitary sewer system and the applicant does not propose any changes to the number of fixture units. Per the Engineering Department, no sewer improvements are required. Therefore, the sewer facility has adequate capacity to serve the proposal. M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 6 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Storm Drainage: Two water aa tv and detention facilities are located at t-lie east end of the site. near SW 103rd Avenue. The applicant does not propose increasing impervious surface and the additional presence of the school will not impact the amount of storm water runoff. While the water quality facilities are not functioning adequately (as discussed in the Impact Study (Chapter 18.390) section of this report), the proposed use would not require additional storm drainage facilities. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. The proposed site meets and exceeds the minimum dimensional requirements of the R-3.5 zone, as shown below: Table 1. AuDlicable Dimensional Standards Required as Stated/ Required Conditional Shown in Dimensional Standard in R-3.5 Use Proposal Front setback I NA I 30 ft. I 31 ft. Side setback (west) I NA I 20 ft. I 70 ft. Side setback (east) I NA I 20 ft. 235 ft. Rear setback I NA I 30 ft. 45 ft. 10,000 sq. 153,767 sq. Minimum lot size ft. ft. Average minimum lot width I 65 ft. I I 500 ft. Maximum building height I 30 ft. I I 42 ft."' "Approved by City in previous decision 5. The applicable requirements of 18.330.050 are met; and The proposed site also meets or exceeds additional dimensional standards for the conditional use type, school, as shown in the previous table. 6. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this Code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Community Development Code: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.390, Report Making Procedures; 18.370, Variances and Adjustments; 18.510, Residential Zoning Districts, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage Standards; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.765, Off-Street Parking; 18.780, Signs; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810 Street and Utility Improvements Standards. All other code chapters are inapplicable as approval standards. All applicable requirements of the code are met. Section 18.330.030.B: Conditions of Approval for a Conditional Use. The Hearings Authority may impose conditions on the approval o a conditional use, which are found necessary to ensure the use is compatible with other uses in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding uses and public facilities is minimized. These conditions may include, but are not limited to the following: 1. Limiting the hours, days, place and/or manner of operation; School operating hours are 8:00 AM to 3:30 PM. Students generally arrive at 7:45 AM and leave by 3:30 PM. There is no evidence that would require hours of operation to be limited. 2. Requiring design features which minimize environmental impacts such as noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust; This condition is not necessary because the existing buffer between the site and the single-family homes already minimizes noise and visual impacts. 3. Requiring additional setback areas, lot area, and/or lot depth or width; Not necessary /applicable. M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 7 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • 4. Limiting the building height, size or lot coverage, and/or location on the site; Not necessary/applicable. 5. Designatin the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points; Not necessary7applicable. 6. Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved; No right-of-way dedication is required. However, staff recommends the Mowing: ♦ Staff suggests that additional right-of-way be dedicated to the Public along the front Ig of 103rd Avenue to increase the right-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. Note: This is recommendation and not a condition of approval. 7. Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage and/or surfacing of parking and loading areas; Not necessary/applicable. 8. Limiting the number, size, location, height and/or lighting of signs; The applicant indicated plans to put up a small sign. Per the sign code (Chapter 18.780), the subject site is allowed the following: ♦ One wall sign, not exceeding 5% of the gross area of the wall face per conditional use. ♦ One freestanding sign, not exceeding 6 feet in height or 32 square feet per conditional use. ♦ Directional signs, not exceeding 4 square feet per sign per driveway. 9. Limiting or setting standards for the location and/or intensity of outdoor lighting; Not necessary/applicable. 10. Requiring berms, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for their installation and maintenance; Not necessary/applicable. 11. Requiring and designating the size, height, location and/or materials for fences; Not necessary/applicable. 12. Requiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, soils, vegetation, watercourses, habitat areas and/or drainage areas; Not necessary/ applicable. 13. Requiring the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain when land form alterations and development are allowed within the 100-year floodplain; and Not necessary/applicable. 14. Requiring the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. Not necessary/applicable. Chanter 18.360 - Site Develoument Review Section 18.360.020.A: Annlicability and exemptions. Site development review shall be applicable to all new developpments and major modification of existing developments, except it shall not apply to 18.360.020.A.1 through 10. The proposed change of use is a major modification of an existing development that is a conditional use and site development review criteria, where applicable, shall apply. Section 18.360.090.A.1: Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title including Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Standards. Section 18.810.030.E: Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths. This section requires a local M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 8 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER street to have a 54 ri ht-of-w width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 103rd Avenue, which is classified as a local street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At resent there is approximately 25 feet of ROW from centerline according to the most recent tax assessors map. The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to provide 27 feet from centerline in accordance with the City's adopted TSP. The applicant also states that the improvements are constructed with sufficient ROW under a previous land use decision. 14awever; the While the standards have changed and a Conditional Use application must meet the current standards, SW 103`d is a local street with existing sidewalks. The City has no plans to widen the street. , the ftpPliefta Therefore, no ROW dedication is required, but staff suggests that the applicant shall provide ROW dedication for a total of 27 feet from centerline. SW 103rd Avenue is currently improved. The applicant states there is 33-34 feet of pavement width, exceeding the 32 feet required. There is an existing 2.5 foot wide planter strip and a 5 foot wide sidewalk. This does not meet the standard, but as a continuation of existing conditions the sidewalk and planter will be accepted as is with this application. The site also lies adjacent to Canterbury Lane, which is classified as a local street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. The applicant states there is 50 feet of ROW. At present, there is approximately 55 feet of ROW, 30 feet of ROW north of centerline. No additional ROW is required. SW Canterbury Lane is currently improved. The pavement width is 32 feet from curb to curb. There is a wider section where a pull-out occurs. There is a 10 foot wide planter strip and a minimum 6 foot wide sidewalk that is partially in the ROW and partially within an easement. No additional improvements are required. FINDING: SW Canterbury meets the minimum ROW and pavement width, but SW 103`d Avenue does not. Recommendation: Staff suggests additional right-of-way be dedicated to the public along the frontage of 103rd Avenue to increase the right-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. Note: This is a recommendation and not a condition of approval. ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS The applicant will be required to pay a Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) at the time of receiving a buildin permit. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy ExpansionMolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Presently, the TIF for the entire project is estimated at $20,625. These numbers increase by 6% annually and are subject to change as determined at building permit submittal. Since the TIF only mitigates for approximately 32 percent of a project's impact, approximately 68 percent is unmitigated. The actual cost of system improvements per trip generated by new development on the transportation system can be determined by the following equation (Larson, McKenzie Engineering, Dolan Findings, June 1995): TIF=0.32=100% of the total impact. $20,625 divided by 0.32 equals $64,453. Since the TIF will mitigate for a ortion of this impact, it is subtracted from the total ($64,453- $20,625=$43,828). Therefore, the valpue of the required exactions should be roughly proportionate to this remaining $43,828. Estimated Value of Impacts Full Impact ` $64,453 Less TIP Assessment -$20.625 Estimated Value of Unmitigated Impacts $43,828 FINDING: Using the above cost factors, it can be determined that the unmitigated impacts exceed the M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 9 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER costs of the con•ns imposed and, therefore, the condi• s are justified. ROW dedication has been recommended, but not required. proportionally Section 18.810.070.A: Sidewalks. This section equires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. The sidewalk along 103rd Avenue is 5 feet wide and the sidewalk along Canterbury Lane is a minimum of 6 feet wide, thereby meeting this criterion. Section 18.810.090.A: Sewers. There are no proposed changes to the number of fixture units; therefore no sewer improvements are required. Section 18.810.100.C: Accommodation of Upstream Drainage. There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this development. Section 18.810.100.D: Effect on Downstream Drainage. This development application does not propose any changes to the impervious surface area; therefore additional detention will not be required. Section 18.810.110.A: Bikeway Extension. Developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Canterbury Lane and 103rd Avenue are not identified as bicycle facilities. Section 18.810.120: Utilities. All utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above round, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.C states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW 103rd Avenue. A fee in-lieu of undergrounding was paid as a condition of CUP92-0001. Therefore, this condition has been met. Section 18.360.090.A.2: Relationship to the natural and physical environment: a. Buildings shall be: (1) Located to preserve ex.stin trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; (2~ Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; (3) Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and (4) Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 10 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/NTAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • Because the building is existing, some of the above requirements do not apply because they apply mainly to new construction. Only the requirements that apply will be addressed. The building is located on the western portion of the site, where the topography is highest. Two stormwater drainage facilities are located at the east end of the site, where the topography is lowest. With an approximate 3 per cent slope, the building is located in an area that is not slumping or sliding. The building is adequate for fire-fighting, based on the fact that Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has visited the site and has recommended no conditions of approval. Therefore, the existing building meets the requirements of 18.360.090.A.2 where applicable. b. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal No trees are being removed. Therefore, this criterion is met. Section 18.360.090.A.4: Buffering, screening and compatibility between adjoining uses: a. Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses, for example, between single- family and multiple-family residential, and residential and commercial uses, and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer: A landscaped buffer already exists between the proposed site and the single-family homes to the north. The buffer separates the homes from a driveway, the parking lot and playground. The eastern and northern boundaries of the site are adjacent to streets; therefore, no buffering is necessary. The western boundary of the site abuts asingle-family home and multi-family housing and there is a landscaped strip of mature trees and shrubs along this boundary. Therefore, this criterion is met. (1) The purpose of the buffer, for example to decrease noise levels, absorb air pollution, filter dust, or to provide a visual barrier; The purpose of the existing buffer is to provide a visual barrier and decrease noise levels from the site. This criterion is met. (2) The size of the buffer required to achieve the purpose in terms of width and height; The buffer matrix requires level D buffering and screening for a parking lot abutting single-family detached homes. The existing landscaped buffer is 16-20 feet wide and includes mature vegetation (trees and shrubs) and a 6-foot high fence. Therefore, it meets D2, if not D1, buffering standards, as shown in Table 18.745.2. Single- and multi-family homes neighbor the western boundary of the site and a wide landscaped strip exists between the homes and the church site. Therefore, this standard is met. (3) The direction(s) from which buffering is needed; (4) The required density of the buffering; and (5) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. The existing buffer takes into account the above; therefore, these criteria are met. b. On site screening from view from adjoining properties of such things as service areas, storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air cooling and heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: The site provides screening of the parking areas from neighboring homes and public right-of-way. (1) What needs to be screened; (2) The direction from which it is needed; (3) How dense the screen needs to be; (4) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile; and (5) Whether the screening needs to be year around. and (5) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. The existing screening takes into account the above; therefore, these criteria are met. 18.360.090.A.9: Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: a. The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility; and The existing site has been designed to provide for crime prevention, as described in the response to 18.360.090.g.9.b below. M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 11 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER b. These areas may be defined by, but not limited to: (1) A deck, atio, low wall, hedge, or draping vine; (2) A trellis or arbor; (3) A change in elevation or grade; (4) A change in the texture of the path material; (5) Sign; or (6) andscaping. The existing structures on the site are surrounded by asphalt parking areas on three sides. The perimeter of the site is lined with landscaping, which demarcates the site. The front entrance is clearlyy visible from the sidewalk and marked by a pathway of different texture than the sidewalk. The on-site playground is a private outdoor area that is fenced in, allowing only users and occupants of the building to enter it. Therefore, this standard is met. Section 18.360.090.A.10: Crime prevention and safety: a. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; b. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed b others; c. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; d. The exterior lightinii levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and e. gg ht fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The school will be located on the lower floor of the existing building, which has windows that provide a view of the playground, an access driveway and the east parking lot. The lower-floor windows will allow school employees to monitor areas that may be vulnerable to crime (i.e. playground or parking lot). The existing lighting mi the parking lot and at the building entrance provide sufficient lighting for the school, which operates during the day. 18.360.090.A.11.a: Public Transit. Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to or within 500 feet of existing or proposed transit route. The site is within 1500 feet of the nearest transit route, which is Hi hway 99W. Because the site is not within 500 fee of an existing or proposed transit route, no provisions or public transit are necessary. Section 18.360.090.A.12: Landscaping: a. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745; The existing landscaping meets current standards more or less. The site is developed with street trees on both SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103rd Avenue, meeting provision 18.745.040.A. The existing east parking lot is developed with approximately 4-foot landscaped islands that include a mixture of trees and shrubs. The western parking area is separated from the building by a wide landscaped area of trees and shrubs and is Narking adjacent housing by trees and shrubs. Screening of parking/loading areas meets provision 18.745.050.E more or less. b. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and c. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. FINDING: The existing Landscaping was last approved in CUP2000-00002. There have been no reductions in landscaping since 2000 and the applicant does not propose any reduction the existing landscaping. Therefore, this condition is met. Section 18.360.090.A.13. Drainage: All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan; Per Engineering, the existing drainage facilities are adequate for the proposed use. Section 18.360.090.A.14. Provision for the disabled: All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447; and Awalkways ) to building entries are paved with a hard surface and there are 5 disabled- cparking spaces c osest to the entrance of the building and 2 closest to the school. For the purposes of the school, this standard has been met. M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 12 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Section 18.360.090.A.15. All opthe provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. ; (Ord. 02-33) All provisions and regulations of the underlying zone have been met, other than what has been granted a variance or adjustment. Chanter 18.370 - Variances and Adiustments The applicant has req ested an adjustment to the bicycle parking requirement found in Table 18.765.2, which specifies 6 bicycle par ' g spaces per classroom for elementary and junior high school. Section 18.370.020.C.7.e: Reduction in required bicycle parking. The Director may approve a reduction in required bicycle parking per Section 18.765.050.E by means of Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, if the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed use by its nature would be reasonably anticipated to generate a lesser need for bicycle parking. The required number of bicycle parking is 6 spaces per classroom for elementary and junior high schools. The reason for the required bicycle parking provision is not because each classroom will generate a demand for 6 spaces, but that in sum, the total student body of an elementary or junior high school (K-7) will utilize an average of 6 spaces per classroom. However, as described further, the nature of this charter school is that fewer children will ride their bikes to this location. The M.I.T.C.H. Charter School is unlike a neighborhood school because it accepts students from throughout the regional area and not within a specific district. Therefore, it is more likely that students will live further away than what may be a reasonable biking distance for a child. The TSP also does not identify SW 103`d Street or SW Canterbury Lane as bicycle facilities. This combination of factors leads to the conclusion that it is reasonable to reduce the required bicycle parking. Because the school will be utilizing a total of 8 classrooms, it is required to provide 48 bicycle parking spaces. However, the applicant has requested a reduction to 6 spaces. The ropposed site already rovides a bicycle rack that provides 10 spaces. Staff believes that with 12 teachers, 3 administrators, and T60 K-7 `h rade students, a minimum of 6 bicycle spaces should be adequate in addition to the existing bicycle rack. This should be adequate to accommodate the relative small proportion of bicycle riders. FINDING: It is reasonable to reduce the required bicycle parking, however, adequate provisions for bicycle parking is still required. CONDITION: The applicant shall provide a 6-stall bicycle parking structure in addition to the existing onsite bicycle rack that is not within parking aisles, required landscaping or pedestrian ways. A revised plan will be required showing the location and specific design and location of the required bicycle rack in accordance with standards in Section 18.765.050.A through D of the code. Chanter 18.705 - Access, Egress and Circulation Section 18.705.020.A: When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures (see Section 18.360.050), and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. The proposed use does not cause an increase in required on-site parking or loading, as discussed in the Off-street Parking and Loading (Chapter 18.765) section of this report. Therefore, other than what has been addressed in previous sections of this report, access, egress and circulation requirements do not apply. Chanter 18.725 - Environmental Performance Standards The purpose of this chapter is to apply federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 13 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725. 30 regulates: Noise, visible emissions, vibration, odors and insects and rodents. The proposed charter school is not expected to generate visible emissions, vibrations, or odors that would be detectable beyond the property line. All waste will be stored in closed containers, and the grounds will be maintained in a manner that would not attract insects and rodents. Noise, typical of a children's playground, may be a potential issue as a result during the morning and afternoon drop-off and pick-up tunes and recess during the day. The existing buffer along the northern boundary will mitigate the noise. Between the hours of 7 AM and 9 PM the use shall not generate sound levels in excess of 50 dBA when measured at the property line of the adjacent single-family homes. This standard is applicable at all times. FINDING: The applicant does not address how it will mitigate noise, however, the standard can be met if the applicant satisfies the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant is hereby notified that generating noise in excess of 50 dBA may result in Hzivise alteration of activities. The applicant shall certify that the proposed use in excess of the standards specified in the Tigard Municipal Code, Chanter 18.745 - Landscaning and Screening Landscaping and screening standards have already been addressed in the Site Development Review (Chapter 18.360) section of this report. Chanter 18.755 - Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage Section 18.755.010.B: Anulicability. The mixed solid waste and source separated recyclable storage standards shall apply to new multi-unit residential buildings containing five or more units and non-residential construction that are subject to full site plan or design review; and are located within urban zones that allow, outright or by condition, for such uses. Although this major modification is subject to some site development review standards, the existing site does not. fall under the definitions of "new multi-unit residential buildings and non-residential construcon that are subject to full site plan or design review." However, the applicant has provided a letter from Pride Disposal (Exhibit 11) indicating that the site is suitable for disposal service. Chanter 18.765 - Off-Street Parking and Loading Section 18.765.020: Aualicability. Change of use. When an existing structure is changed from one use to another use as listed in Section 18.765.070, the following provisions shall apply: 1. If the parking requirements for each use are the same, no additional vehicle parking shall be required; 2. Where a change results in an intensification of use in terms of the number of vehicle parking spaces required, additional vehicle parking spaces shall be provided in an amount equal to tfie Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements 18.765-2 SE Update: '4105 difference between the number of spaces required for the existin use and the number of spaces required for the more intensive use; 3. Where the change resu~ts in a decrease in intensity of use, the applicant may eliminate excess vehicle parking spaces in an amount equal to the difference between the number of spaces required for the existing use and the number of spaces required for the less intensive use. The proposed addition of the school and change of use does not result in any of the above for vehicle puking spaces, as shown in the response to Section 18.765.070 (Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements) below. Therefore, the provisions of this section do not apply, other than bicycle parking standards. Section 18.765.070: Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements H. Specific requirements. (See Table 18.765.2) (Ord. 02-13) The off-street parking requirement for a school is 6 spaces per classroom. At 8 proposed classrooms, 16 spaces are required. The site provides 177 spaces and 5 disabled-accessible spaces and 29 spaces in the west side parking area primarily used for staff. In addition, there are 50 parking spaces off-site, which would be available for school use, if necessary. Because regular church hours do not coincide with regular school hours, the school will have access to more than adequate parking. The proposed use also does not M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 14 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER change the access re uirements or the site. The proposed use would require one 30-foot access way with 24-fot pavement. The existing site has three access ways of at least 30 feet with 24-foot pavement, which already meets access, egress and circulation requirements. Therefore, the parking standard is already met and no additional spaces are required. Section 18.765.080.A: Off-street loading spaces. The applicant has not proposed a loading space or indicated that the school will need a loading space. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Section 18.390.040.E: Minimum bicycle parking requirements. This provision is addressed in the Variances and Adjustments (Chapter 18.370) section of this report. Chanter 18.795 - Visual Clearance Areas Section 18.795.020.A: When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. The change of use does not increase the on-site parkinor loading requirements or change access requirements. Therefore, the provisions of this chapter do-not apply, other than what has already been adessed Conditional Use (Chapter 18.330) section of this report. Chanter 18.810 - Street And Utility Improvements Standards Street and utility standards have already been addressed in the Site Development Review (Chapter 18.360) section of this report. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and has recommended the conditions below, to be satisfied prior to a final building inspection. ♦ Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of 103rd Avenue to increase the right-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. ♦ Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall trim the trees and bushes specified in the Traffic Analysis report in order to improve sight distance. ♦ Prior to final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for the three access points. ♦ The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 103rd Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. This fee is not required if the applicant, in conjunction with the City's Finance Department, can provide evidence of the fee being paid previously. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 9590.00 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. The Engineering Department also provided the following comment: "The City of Tigard is responsible for assignin g addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (LJSB). An addressing fee in the amount of $ 50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of permits. The addressing fee will only be required if the applicant is requesting a new address that is exclusive to the charter school." The Engineering department made the following recommendation: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee, if applicable to the charter school. (STAFF CONTACT: Bethany Stewart, Engineering). RESPONSE: Detailed comments are included in the case file and incorporated into the report. The M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 15 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER f 0 applicable conditions of approave been included in the staff recommendation. The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and recommended the following condition of approval: ♦ Building ermits are required for the change of use. Plans shall indicate all 8 classrooms and their existing facilities. RESPONSE: The applicant is required to obtain a building permit for the change of occupancy. The recommended condition of approval has been included in the staff recommendation. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: "The fire district has no conditions of approval for this proposal. We do have issues with the property owners doing building modifications without the benefit of an appropriate plan review and the issuance of the required permits." RESPONSE: TVF&R's concern has been addressed by the condition of approval recommended by the City of Tigard Building Division. Pr<P-PARED BY-.-,--71mily-'-15ng Assistant Planner APPROVED BY: Richard H. BewelzArff Planning Manager l (S / Zoo , / DATE /~S/Zvu / DATE M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL CUP2006-00002 / VAR2006-00069 PAGE 16 OF 16 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER CITY of TIGARD YY S TEE M I VICINITY MAP CUP2006- 00002 ` VAR2006-00069 C~ M.I.T.C.H. CE-3ARTER <j SCHOOL L-- '0F]4LTEfM_ S RR - l ST FEa 1~ a i CANTERBURY LN nA _ m \ ll BEEF BEND RO~ f i Tigard Area Map (-j N EDE - 77 1 2-W 300 M F__ L1, - 1"= 311 feet 9B 9% . Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. Ego 13125 SW Hag Blvd Tigard. OR 97223 I (0.3) s39-4171 IELMONTE DR htlp:Nwww.ci.tigard.or.us ;ommunity Development Plot date: Jul 27, 2006; C:imagiclMAGIC01APR 1 .140.40 4 , i 1~5.~2 - v 8~I i ~ . f r'.J 1 . !l `f Y l - - MM. ~Y MSG ti 1 t ~ So 1 g. u: I m g ~ i 00+ ,,,~~~SSS • ' ' Presbvterian Church Robert Gray Partners Inc. 10445 S.W. Canterbury Lane. i e Tigard, Oregon 9.7224-4811. Agenda Item: 2.1 Hearing Date: 8.21.2006 Time: 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE . r~ HEARING'S OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON r11T7cC;nRL~~ SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL CASE NOS: Conditional Use Pernut (CUP) CUP2006-00002 Adjustment (VAR) VAR2006-00069 APPLICANT: M.I.T.CH Charter School OWNER: Calvin Presbyterian Church Attn: Debi Lorence 10445 SW Canterbury Lane PO Box 230575 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 APPLICANT'S REP: Ed Murphy Parati - LDC Design Group 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro, OR 97124 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow the M.I.T.C.H. Charter School to operate on the Calvin Presbyterian Church site. The 3.53-acre site includes classrooms, a multi-use area and an outdoor playground that will accommodate the K-7 school. The applicant does not propose any changes to the church exterior or site. In addition, the applicant requests an adjustment to reduce the required number of bicycle parking spaces from 48 to 6. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; WCIM 2S111BC, Tax Lot 2800. ZONING: R-3.5: Low Density Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725,18.745,18.755,18.765,18.780,18.790,18.795, and 18.810. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Hearings Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City and meets the Approval Standards for a Conditional Use. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the following recommended Conditions of Approval: KI.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 1 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Current Planning Division (Emily Eng, (503) 718-2712) for review and approval: 1. The applicant shall provide a 6-stall bicycle rack that is not within parking aisles, required landscaping or pedestrian ways. A revised plan will be required showing the location and specific design and location of the required bicycle rack in accordance with standards in Section 18.765.050.A through D of the code. 2. The applicant is hereby notified that generating noise in excess of 50 dBA may result in complaints requinng alteration of activities. The applicant shall certify that the proposed use will not generate noise in excess of the standards specified in the Tigard Municipal Code, CFiapter 7.40.160. 3. The applicant shall obtain a sign permit prior to erecting a sign on the site. The subject sign shall compIywith the sign code (Chapter 17.780). 4. Based on staff observation of the water quality facilities, staff suggests that the applicant work with the property owner to replant the water quality facilities and implement a maintenance plan to mitigate the impacts of not only additional vehicle trips, but current trips. Note: This is a recommendation and not a condition of approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Building Department (Brian Blalock, (503) 718-2436) for review and approval: 5. The applicant is required to obtain a building permit for the, change of use/occupancy. The applicant shall submit a revised interior floor plan that shows which rooms will be used as classrooms. THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Engineering Department (Bethany Stewart, (503) 718-2436) for review and approval: 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee if using an address other than the existing address of the proposed site. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kiln McMillan, (503) 718-2642) for review and approval: 7. Prior to final building inspection,. the applicant shall trim the trees and bushes specified in the Traffic Analysis report in order to improve sight distance. 8. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for the three access points. 9. Staff suggests that additional right-of-way be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of 103rd Avenue to increase the right-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing ri ht-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available Irom the Engineering Department. Note: This is recommendation and not a condition of approval. THIS APPROVAL MUST BE IMPLEMENTED WITHIN 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S REPORT. KI.T.CH CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 2 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 0 • SE CTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Proposal Description: The appli cant is-requesting a conditional use permit to allow the M.I.T.C.H. Charter School to occupy the Calvin Presb erian Church site. The school offers K-7 has 160 students and will have 12 teachers and 2 support staff. The school proposes to use the lower level of the church, ~ich includes classrooms, a multi- use area, as well as the existing fenced playground on site. The applicant does not propose any changes to the church exterior or site. The property owner will modify the lower level of the building to provide 8 classrooms total (currently, there are 6 classrooms and additional space that can be converted to 2 classrooms). In addition, the applicant requests an adjustment to reduce the required number of bicycle parking spaces from 48 to 6. Site and Vicinity Information: The 3.53-acre site is located on the NW corner of SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103`d Avenue. Adjacent uses include: single-family homes to the north; a parking lot (used and owned by the Calvin Presbyterian Church) and single-family homes across the street to the east; the John Tigard House and Tigard Water District property to the south; and multi-family housing to the west. The site is in an R-3.5 zone, is adjacent to an R 12 zone to the west and has a slope of approximately 3 per cent. Site History: The Calvin Presbyterian Church was fast built on the existing site in 1965. The church made significant expansions in 1992, 1994 and 2000. In 1992, the Cittyy ap proved the construction of a new s feet (CUP92-00001). In narthex, fellowship and classroom building containing approximately 5. 15uary Muare 1994, the City approved the construction of a 9,700-square foot sanct94-00004). In 2000, the City, approved a 16,670-square foot two-story addition to use as classroom space (CUP2000-00002). In addition, the church acquired property across the street from the site on the corner of SW 103 Avenue and Inez Street, which the City approved for a parking lot (CUP2001-00002). Concerns Raised by Neighbors: The applicant held a neighborhood meetmi on July 27 2006 at 7:00 PM, as documented in the meeting minutes provided with this application (Exlg bit 0). 10 property owners within 500 feet of the subject site were invited. Twelve residents attended the meeting and none had objections to the proposal. Topics discussed include: number of students, where students come from, traffic impacts, school curriculum, recess, special needs students, use of interior space and liability. SECTION IV. REPORT MAKING PROCEDURES. PERMITS AND USE Use Classification Section 18.130.020 lists the Use Categories. The Calvin Presbyterian Church and M.I.T.C.H. Charter School are different uses within the civic use type. Specifically, the Church is classified as a religious institution and M.I.T.C.H. is classified as a school. Therefore, a change of use will occur if the charter school becomes a tenant of the church site, resulting in a major modification to a conditional use. Summarv of Land Use Permits and Decision-making Procedures Section 18.330.020.B.3 states that, upon the Director determining that the proposed modification to the conditional use plan is a major modification, the applicant shall submit a new application in accordance with Section 18.390.050 (Type III-HO procedure). Type III-HO procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that predominantly contain discretionary approval criteria. Type III-HO actions are decided by the Hearings Officer with appeals being heard by the City Council. The applicant is also requesting reduction in the required bicycle parking by means of an adjustment, which is processed as a Type II procedure. Staff has recommended a decision to be considered by the Hearings Officer. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA Staff has reviewed the proposal for consistency with the following code sections. Section is in Section VI of this report. KI.T.CH CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 3 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER SECTION V. SUMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA Staff has reviewed the proposal for consistency with the following code sections. Section is in Section VI of this report. A. Zoning Districts 18.510 - Residential Zoning Districts B. Impact Study 18.390 C. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.330 - Conditional Use 18.360 - Site Development Review 18.370 - Variances and Adjustments 18.705 - Access Egress and Circulation 18.725 - Environmental Performance Standards 18.745 - Landscaping and Screening 18.755 - Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage 18.765 - Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements 18.795 - Visual Clearance 18.810 - Street and Utility Improvement Standards SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. ZONING DISTRICTS Chanter 18.510 - Residential Zoning Districts Lists the description of the residential Zoning District. The proposed site is in an R-3.5 zone, a low-density residential district designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. The proposed use (school) is permitted conditionally in the R-3.5 zone. B. IMPACT STUDY Section 18.390.040.B.2.e: Impact study. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur v h the dedication requirements, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Little impact is expected on the following systems: parks, water, sewer and lighting. The applicant does not propose any changes to alter these systems or significantly impact them. The proposed use does increase traffic to and from the site. The applicant provided a traffic study, based on a conservative estimate of the school's population (K-8, 198 students). The traffic study (Exhibit 13) shows that the school will generate approximately 174 vehicle trips during the morning and 129 tri s during the mid-afternoon peak hour of the school. While the morning peak hour of the school coincides with the general morning peak hour of traffic (7:15 AM to 8:15 AM), the mid-afternoon peak hour of the school 1(3:00 PM to 4:00 PM) does not coincide with the general evening commuter traffic (4:45 PM to 5:45 PM). The traffic study concludes that the study area intersections will continue to operate at a Level of Service (LOS) B or better during weekday peak hours. The study area intersections include SW M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 4 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Canterbury Lane and SW 103`d Ivenue and SW Inez Street and SW 103`d Avenue. The proposal does not impact the drainage system in that the applicant is not increasing runoff by increasin g impervious surface area. Therefore, the addition of the school does not cause the need for additional detention. However, the increase in vehicle trips, as discussed above, may impact water quality by adding pollutants to the current level of storm water runoff. While the applicant does not address impacts to storm water duality, staff visited the site and observed that the two on-site water-quality facilities are in poor condition and provide no water quality treatment due to the lack of plantings. No improvements are required; however, staff suggests that the applicant work with the property owner to replant the water quality facilities and implement a maintenance plan to mitigate the impacts of not only additional vehicle trips, but current trips. Some noise impact is expected from the playground during the week. The playground is located on the north side of the school and is separated from adjacent single family homes by a driveway, 6-foot high fence and a 16 to 20-foot landscape buffer. Some noise in the morning and afternoon is also expected, as students arrive and leave. FINDING: The proposed use will not generate significant impacts. RECOMMENDATION: Staff suggests that the applicant work with the property owner to replant the water quality facilities and implement a maintenance plan to mitigate the impacts of not only additional vehicle trips, but current trips. This is a recommendation and not a condition of approval. C. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Chanter 18.330 - Conditional Use Section 18.330.010.A: Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and section. The proposed use (school) requires a conditional use permit in a residential zone. The applicant is requesting approval of a major modification of the Calvin Presbyterian Church site to allow the school to use the site. Section 18.330.030: Approval Standards for a Conditional Use. The Hearings Officer shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a conditional use or to enlarge or alter a conditional use based on findings of fact with respect to each of the following criteria: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; The M.I.T.C.H. Charter School is K-7, has an enrollment of 160 students, and will have 12 teachers and 3 support staff. The Calvin Presbysterian Church is fully developed, including a multi-use room, a playground, space for 8 classrooms, parking, lighting and landscaping. The necessary services and infrastructure are available (electric, natural gas, cable, garbage disposal, streets, sewer, storm drainage, and water). The size and dimensions of the Calvin Presbyterian Church site are adequate for the needs of a school. However, it is not clear from the floor plan (Exhibit 7) that the lower level of the church can accommodate 8 classes. The floor plan shows 6 rooms labeled "classrooms." There are also 4 rooms in the space labeled "Existing Canton Hall." Per email from the applicant, the property owner will be remodeling the area labeled "Existing Canton Hall" to provide 2 additional classrooms. Prior to receiving building permit(s) to occupy the site, the applicant shall submit a site plan that shows which rooms will be used as classrooms. FINDING: The proposed site is adequate for the needs of the school. However, it is not clear from the floor plan (Exhibit 7) that the lower level of the church can accommodate 8 classes. Criterion #1 will be met when the condition below is satisfied. M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 5 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 0 0 CONDITION: Prior to receiving building permit(s), the applicant shall submit a revised interior floor plan that shows which rooms will be used as classrooms. 2. The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography and natural features; The school Ube a secondary use within the already developed church site and the applicant does not propose any exterior changes. Expected impacts will be minor. There will be some noise impact during recess. The trees and shrubs in the 16 to 20-foot landscaping strip along the north boundary of the site will buffer and screen the adjacent properties from playground activity and noise. Traffic will be the most significant impact. According to the traffic study (Exhibit 13), as previously discussed in this report, the school will generate approximately 174 vehicle trips during the morning and 129 trips during the mid-afternoon peak hour of the school. The traffic engineer concluded, based on the full analyses described in the traffic study, that the charter school can be operated on the church site without adversely affecting traffic operations or safety near the site. Key intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable Level of Service with the school's maximum enrollment. The internal circulation system serves the site well, with driveways set far enough back from adjacent intersections to avoid potential traffic conflicts. In addition, employee and school-related parking can be accommodated by the existing parking lot. The traffic engineer observes that some of the existing landscaping is affecting sight distance from the two main driveways. However, the required site distance can be met and even exceeded by trimming some of the existing trees and bushes. The applicant shall be required to trim the trees and bushes specified in the Traffic Section report in order to improve sight distance. The applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for the three access points. FINDING: The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography and natural features. However, site distance is somewhat obstructed by overgrown bushes and trees. Because traffic will be the most significant impact, the applicant shall satisfy the conditions below to ensure that the site can accommodate the increased traffic flow. CONDITIONS: Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall trim the trees and bushes specified in the Traffic Section report in order to improve sight distance. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for the three access points. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; and The site is fully developed and in an area that is fully developed. The applicant does not propose any changes that would reTuire improvements to public facilities. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the school, as shown below: Streets: The site is served by SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103rd Street. Both streets are fully improved and as concluded from the traffic study (Exhibit 13), have adequate capacity to serve the school. However, the applicant shall be required as a condition of approval to dedicate an additional 2 feet of ROW on SW 103`d Avenue (as discussed on in the Site Development Review (Chapter 18.360) section of this report). Water: The site already receives water service and the applicant does not propose any changes to the existing water service. Therefore, while water usage may be increase somewhat, there is adequate capacity to serve the proposed use. Sanitarv Sewer: The site is already connected to the sanitary sewer system and the applicant does not propose any changes to the number of fixture units. Per the Engineering Department, no sewer improvements are required. Therefore, the sewer facility has adequate capacity to serve the proposal. M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 6 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 0 T;UHLF 18-10.2 DEATLO : , S7.40NDARDS IN RESMENTUL ZBtiF-5 M-UMARD xfin Lgi,Si.t -.tom^~d.,~,it. -.Att&,md uc~:1 ni Ave-491. !-1ii Lee WidLh _ f i f:Ciiilk& Auei aittl ui.:'. fig ::fLkifr~lifi C C1 ~Gti~1~W ~C I:f~i>-~~ FedltiYlu . R~~ ar,~ryl - SiLY: Caxir~r G1idr`1 uiy - si°.Y.. if i)nfywd Cul igg'fta:fe f"=X1EkY_' nhiq'aSwitn -1Afil ax° L~tivu5:f~ fti"Y hig cjW Carta Mcciftnm Efe!:ito RZ I B12 I R.a I F LS 1 R-7 SOiB q Lt. 211;Ria'}Vt4P_ 1Q0M ~qA 3'..446 q ft 59010 u:d fl 34 T nyp. [ lra'lr,. ft 5-CO) txn' W fL 300& fi$ a. SD IL yfifL on 90 ft 50& :100 - I - I - I - I efi3tiF~ l V0 fir ML 2S L7 eft GSrI M R_ wk 2r a 1' (t ~txit so eft Sft 24,R IS& 130 It ft Difi. 347f1. 1W it E~~I 2110 20 ft 3~f1 X3 it I Wk I ID Lt. 1 wO fl: 1 3:5 A ~'IJ 9ir~le-Cuirctif t<tuiiii~l i:x~i~rtirl: i~ilir G~rrYcSr~h3 61sa~~llizt~ ~a 1Gt math nt~ tmY ~'t7: 1 Crti~ 3~G~ta1 rciit~ ui.~ist~~ £r_jr 2J l silts eft A hi5ludm all Wil• ft;* em:2 itir~etfi7o fib 5. The applicable requirements of 18.330.050 are met; and The proposed site also meets or exceeds additional dimensional standards for the conditional use type, school, as shown in the previous table. 6. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this Code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Community Development Code: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.390, Report Making Procedures; 18.370, Variances and Adjustments; 18.510, Residential Zoning Districts, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage Standards; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.765, Off-Street Parking; 18.780, Signs; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810 Street and Utility Improvements Standards. All other code chapters are inapplicable as approval standards. All applicable requirements of the code are met. Section 18.330.030.B: Conditions of Approval for a Conditional Use. The Hearings Authority may impose conditions on the approval ofa conditional use, which are found necessary to ensure the use is compatible with other uses in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding uses and public facilities is minimized. These conditions may include, but are not limited to the following: 1. Limiting the hours, days, place and/or manner of operation; School operating hours are 8:00 AM to 3:30 PM. Students generally arrive at 7:45 AM and leave by 3:30 PM. There is no evidence that would require hours of operation to be limited. 2. Requiringg design features which minimize environmental impacts such as noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust; This condition is not necessary because the existing buffer between the site and the single-family homes already minimizes noise and visual impacts. 3. Requiring additional setback areas, lot area, and/or lot depth or width; M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 7 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Not necessary/applicable. 0 • 4. Limiting the building height, size or lot coverage, and/or location on the site; Not necessary /applicable. 5. Designating the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points; Not necessaryapplicable. 6. Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved; No right-of-way dedication is required. However, staff recommends the following: ♦ Staff suggests that additional right-of-way be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of 103rd Avenue to increase the right-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. Note: This is recommendation and not a condition of approval. 7. Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage and/or surfacing of parking and loading areas; Not necessary /applicable. 8. Limiting the number, size, location, height and/or lighting of signs; The applicant indicated plans to put up a small sign. Per the sign code (Chapter 18.780), the subject site is allowed the following: ♦ One wall sign, not exceeding 5% of the gross area of the wall face per conditional use. ♦ One freestanding sign, not exceeding 6 feet in height or 32 square feet per conditional use. ♦ Directional signs, not exceeding 4 square feet per sign per driveway. 9. Limiting or setting standards for the location and/or intensity of outdoor lighting; Not necessary/applicable. 10. Requiring berms, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for their installation and maintenance; Not necessary /applicable. 11. Requiring and designating the size, height, location and/or materials for fences; Not necessary/applicable. 12. Requiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, soils, vegetation, watercourses, habitat areas and/or drainage areas; Not necessary /applicable. 13. RegTiring the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain when land form alterations and development are allowed within the 100-year floodplain; and Not necessary/applicable. 14. Requiring the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. Not necessary/applicable. Chanter 18.360 - Site Develonment Review Section 18.360.020.A: Annlicability and exemntions. Site development review shall be applicable to all new developments and major modification of existing developments, except it shall not apply to 18.360.020.A.1 through 10. The proposed change of use is a major modification of an existing development that is a conditional use and site development review criteria, where applicable, shall apply. Section 18.360.090.A.1: Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title including Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Standards. M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 8 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Section 18.810.030.E: Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths. This section requires a local street to have a 54 right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 103rd Avenue, which is classified as a local street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 25 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to provide 27 feet from centerline in accordance with the City's adopted TSP. The applicant also states that the improvements are constructed with sufficient ROW under a previous land use decision. However, the standards have changed and a Conditional Use application must meet the current standards. Therefore, the applicant shall provide ROW dedication for a total of 27 feet from centerline. SW 103rd Avenue is currently improved. The applicant states there is 33-34 feet of pavement width, exceeding the 32 feet required. There is an existing 2.5 foot wide planter strip and a 5 foot wide sidewalk. This does not meet the standard, but as a continuation of existing conditions the sidewalk and planter will be accepted as is with this application. The site also lies adjacent to Canterbury Lane, which is classified as a local street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. The applicant states there is 50 feet of ROW. At present, there is approximately 55 feet of ROW, 30 feet of ROW north of centerline. No additional ROW is required. SW Canterbury Lane is currently improved. The pavement width is 32 feet from curb to curb. There is a wider section where a pull-out occurs. There is a 10 foot wide planter strip and a minimum 6 foot wide sidewalk that is partially in the ROW and partially within an easement. No additional improvements are required. FINDING: SW Canterbury meets the minimum ROW and pavement width, but SW 103`d Avenue does not. Recommendation: Staff suggests additional right-of-way be dedicated to the public along the frontage of 103rd Avenue to increase the right-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. Note: This is a recommendation and not a condition of approval. ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS The applicant will be required to pay a Washington County Traffic Impact Fee IF) at the time of receivingg a buildin ermit. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy ExpansionMolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Presently, the TIF for the entire project is estimated at $20,625. These numbers increase by 6% annually and are subject to change as determined at building permit submittal. Since the TIF only mitigates for approximately 32 percent of a project's impact, approximately 68 percent is unmitigated. The actual cost of system improvements per trip generated by new development on the transportation system can be determined by the following equation (Larson, McKenzie Engineering, Dolan Findings, June 1995): TIF=0.32=100% of the total impact. $20,625 divided by 0.32 equals $64,453. Since the TIF will mitigate for a ortion of this impact, it is subtracted from the total ($64,453- $20,625=$43,828). Therefore, the valpue of the required exactions should be roughly proportionate to this remaining $43,828. Estimated Value of Impacts Full Impact $64,453 Less TIF Assessment -$20.625 Estimated Value of Unmitigated Impacts $43,828 FINDING: Using the above cost factors, it can be determined that the unmitigated impacts exceed the costs of the conditions imposed and, therefore, the conditions are proportionally justified. ROW dedication has been recommended, but not required. M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 9 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Section 18.810.070.A: Sidewal. This section a uires that sidewalkks a constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. The sidewalk along 103rd Avenue is 5 feet wide and the sidewalk along Canterbury Lane is a minimum of 6 feet wide, thereby meeting this criterion. Section 18.810.090.A: Sewers. There are no proposed changes to the number of fixture units; therefore no sewer improvements are required. Section 18.810.100.C: Accommodation of Upstream Drainage. There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this development. Section 18.810.100.D: Effect on Downstream Drainage. This development application does not propose `any changes to the impervious surface area; therefore additional detention will not be required. Section 18.810.110.A: Bikeway Extension. Developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Canterbury Lane and 103rd Avenue are not identified as bicycle facilities. Section 18.810.120: Utilities. All utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.C states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW 103rd Avenue. A fee in-lieu of undergrounding was paid as a condition of CUP92-0001. Therefore, this condition has been met. Section 18.360.090.A.2: Relationship to the natural and physical environment: a. Buildings shall be: (1) Located to preserve existin trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; (201 Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; (3) Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and (4) Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Because the building is existing, some of the above requirements do not apply because they apply mainly to new construction. Only the requirements that apply will be addressed. The building is located on the western portion of the site, where the topography is highest. Two stormwater drainage facilities are M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 10 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER located at the east end of the s~ where the toDo ranhv is lowest. With an aDDroximate 3 Der cent slope. the building is located in an area that is not slumping or sliding. The building is adequate for fire-fighting, based on the fact that Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has visited the site and has recommended no conditions of approval. Therefore, the existing building meets the requirements of 18.360.090.A.2 where applicable. b. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. No trees are being removed. Therefore, this criterion is met. Section 18.360.090.A.4: Buffering, screening and compatibility between adjoining uses: a. Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses, for example, between single- family and multiple-family residential, and residential and commercial uses, and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer: A landscaped buffer already exists between the proposed site and the single-family homes to the north. The buffer separates the homes from a driveway, the parking lot and playground. The eastern and northern boundaries of the site are adjacent to streets; therefore, no buffering is necessary. The western boundary of the site abuts a single-family home and multi-family housing and there is a landscaped strip of mature trees and shrubs along this boundary. Therefore, this criterion is met. (1) The purpose of the buffer, for example to decrease noise levels, absorb air pollution, filter dust, or to provide a visual barrier; The purpose of the existing buffer is to provide a visual barrier and decrease noise levels from the site. This criterion is met. (2) The size of the buffer required to achieve the purpose in terms of width and height; The buffer matrix requires level D buffering and screening for a parking lot abutting single-family detached homes. The existing landscaped buffer is 16-20 feet wide and includes mature vegetation (trees and shrubs) and a 6-foot high fence. Therefore, it meets D2, if not D1, buffering standards, as shown in Table 18.745.2. Single- and multi-family homes neighbor the western boundary of the site and a wide landscaped strip exists between the homes and the church site. Therefore, this standard is met. (3) The direction(s) from which buffering is needed; (4) The required density of the buffering; and (5) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. The existing buffer takes into account the above; therefore, these criteria are met. b. On site screening from view from adjoining properties of such things as service areas, storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air cooling and heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: The site provides screening of the parking areas from neighboring homes and public right-of-way. (1) What needs to be screened; (2) The direction from which it is needed; (3) How dense the screen needs to be; (4) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile; and (5) Whether the screening needs to be year around. and (5) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. The existing screening takes into account the above; therefore, these criteria are met. 18.360.090.A.9: Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: a. The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establi sh persons having a rigkt to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility; and The existing site has been designed to provide for crime prevention, as described in the response to 18.360 . 09019.b below. b. These areas may be defined by, but not limited to: (1) A deck, atio, low wall, hedge, or draping vine; (2) A trellis or arbor; (3) A change in elevation or grade; r4) A change in the texture of the path material; (5) Sign; or (6) Landscaping. M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 11 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • The existing structures on the to are surrounded by asphalt parking areas on three sides. The perimeter of the site is lined with landscaping, which demarcates the site. The front entrance is clearly visible from the sidewalk and marked by a ppathway of different texture than the sidewalk. The on-site playground is a Therefore, outdoor area that is fenced in, allowing only users and occupants of the building to enter it. Therefore, this standard is met. Section 18.360.090.A.10: Crime prevention and safety: a. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; b. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed b others; c. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; d. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and e. Ligght fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The school will be located on the lower floor of the existingg building, which has windows that provide a view of the playground, an access driveway and the east parking lot. The lower-floor windows will allow school employees to monitor areas that may be vulnerable to crime (i.e. playground or parking lot). The existing lighting in the parking lot and at the building entrance provide sufficient lighting for the school, which operates during the day. 18.360.090.A.11.a: Public Transit. Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to or within 500 feet of existing or proposed transit route. The site is within 1500 feet of the nearest transit route, which is Highway 99W. Because the site is not within 500 fee of an existing or proposed transit route, no provisions for public transit are necessary. Section 18.360.090.A.12: Landscaping: a. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745; The Win landscaping meets current standards more or less. The site is developed with street trees on both Canterbury Lane and SW 103rd Avenue, meeting provision 18.745.040.A. The existing east parking lot is developed with approximately 4-foot landscaped islands that include a mixture of trees and shrubs. The western parking area is separated from the building by a wide landscaped area of trees and shrubs and is screened from adjacent housing by trees and shrubs. Screening of parking/loading areas meets provision 18.745.050.E more or less. b. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and c. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. FINDING: The existing Landscaping was last approved in CUP2000-00002. There have been no reductions un landscaping since 2000 and the applicant does not propose any reduction the existing landscaping. Therefore, this condition is met. Section 18.360.090.A.13. Drainage: All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan; Per Engineering, the existing drainage facilities are adequate for the proposed use. Section 18.360.090.A.14. Provision for the disabled: All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447; and All ground-level walkways to building entries are paved with a hard surface and there are 5 disabled- accessible parking spaces c osest to the entrance of the building and 2 closest to the school. For the purposes of the school, this standard has been met. Section 18.360.090.A.15. All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. ; (Ord. 02-33) M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 12 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • All provisions and regulations o0the underlying zone have been met, other than what has been granted a variance or adjustment. Chanter 18.370 - Variances and Adiustments The applicant has requested an adjustment to the bicycle parking requirement found in Table 18.765.2, which specifies 6 bicycle par ' g spaces per classroom for elementary and junior high school. Section 18.370.020.C.7.e: Reduction in required bicvcle narking. The Director may approve a reduction in required bicycle parking per Section 18.765.05-O.E by means of Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, if the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed use by its nature would be reasonably anticipated to generate a lesser need for bicycle parking. The required number of bicycle parking is 6 spaces per classroom for elementary and junior high schools. The reason for the required bicycle parking provision is not because each classroom will generate a demand for 6 spaces, but that in sum, the total student body of an elementary or junior high school (K-7) will utilize an average of 6 spaces per classroom. However, as described further, the nature of this charter school is that fewer children will ride their bikes to this location. The M.I.T.C.H. Charter School is unlike a neighborhood school because it accepts students from throughout the regional area and not within a specific district. Therefore, it is more likely that students will live further away than what may be a reasonable biking distance for a child. The TSP also does not identify SW 103`d Street or SW Canterbury Lane as bicycle facilities. This combination of factors leads to the conclusion that it is reasonable to reduce the required bicycle parking. Because the school will be utilizing a total of 8 classrooms, it is required to provide 48 bicycle parking spaces. However, the applicant has requested a reduction to 6 spaces. The proposed site already rovides a bicycle rack that provides 10 spaces. Staff believes that with 12 teachers, 3 administrators, and 60 K-7`" ade students, a minimum of 6 bicycle spaces should be adequate in addition to the existing bicycle rack. This should be adequate to accommodate the relative small proportion of bicycle riders. FINDING: It is reasonable to reduce the required bicycle parking, however, adequate provisions for bicycle parking is still required. CONDITION: The applicant shall provide a 6-stall bicycle parking structure that is not within parking aisles, required landscaping or pedestrian ways. A revised plan will be required showing the location and specific desiggnn and location of the required bicycle rack in accordance with standards in Section 18.765.050.A through D of the code. Chanter 18.705 - Access. Egress and Circulation Section 18.705.020.A: When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures (see Section 18.360.050), and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. The proposed use does not cause an increase in required on-site parking or loading, as discussed in the Off-street Parking and Loading (Chapter 18.765) section of this report. Therefore, other than what has been addressed in previous sections of this report, access, egress and circulation requirements do not apply. Chanter 18.725 - Environmental Performance Standards The purpose of this chapter is to apply federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 regulates: Noise, visible emissions, vibration, odors and insects and rodents. The proposed charter school is not expected to generate visible emissions, vibrations, or odors that would M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 13 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • be detectable beyond the proper line. All waste will be stored in closed containers, and the grounds will be maintained in a manner that would not attract insects and rodents. Noise, typical of a children's playground, may be a potential issue as a result during the morning and afternoon -drop-off and pick-up tunes and recess during the day. The existing buffer along the northern boundary will mitigate the noise. Between the hours of 7 AM and 9 PM the use shall not generate sound levels in excess of 50 dBA when measured at the property line of the adjacent single-family homes. This standard is applicable at all times. FINDING: The applicant does not address how it will mitigate noise, however, the standard can be met if the applicant satisfies the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant is hereby notified that generating noise in excess of 50 dBA may result in complaints requiring alteration of activities. The applicant shall certify that the proposed use will not generate noise in excess of the standards specified in the Tigard Municipal Code, Chapter 7.40.160. Chanter 18.745 - Landscaning and Screenin Landscaping and screening standards have aeady been addressed in the Site Development Review (Chapter 18.360) section of this report. Chanter 18.755 - Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage Section 18.755.010.B: Annlicability. The mixed solid waste and source separated recyclable storage standards shall apply to new multi-unit residential buildings containing five or more units and non-residential construction that are subject to full site plan or design review; and are located within urban zones that allow, outright or by condition, for such uses. Although this major modification is subject to some site development review standards, the existing site does not fall under the definitions of "new multi-unit residential buildings ...and...non-residential construction that are subject to full site plan or design review." However, the applicant has provided a letter from Pride Disposal (Exhibit 11) indicating that the site is suitable for disposal service. Chanter 18.765 - Off-Street Parking and Loading Section 18.765.020: Aimlicability. Change of use. When an existing structure is changed from one use to another use as listed in Section 18.765.070, the following provisions shall apply: 1. If the parking requirements for each use are the same, no additional vehicle parking shall be required; 2. Where a change results in an intensification of use in terms of the number of vehicle parking spaces required, additional vehicle parking spaces shall be provided in an amount equal to the Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements 18.765-2 SE Update: 4105 difference between the number of spaces required for the existing use and the number of spaces required for the more intensive use; 3. Where the change results in a decrease in intensity of use, the applicant may eliminate excess vehicle parking spaces in an amount equal to the difference between the number of spaces required for the existing use and the number of s aces required for the less intensive use. The proposed addition of the school and change oruse does not result in any of the above for vehicle parking spaces, as shown in the response to Section 18.765.070 (Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements) below. Therefore, the provisions of this section do not apply, other than bicycle parking standards. Section 18.765.070: Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements H. Specific requirements. (See Table 18.765.2) (Ord. 02-13) The off-street parking requirement for a school is 6 spaces per classroom. At 8 proposed classrooms, 16 spaces are required. The site provides 177 spaces and 5 disabled-accessible spaces and 29 spaces in the west side parking area primarily used for staff. In addition, there are 50 parking spaces off-site, which would be available for school use, if necessary. Because regular church hours do not coincide with regular school hours, the school will have access to more than adequate parking. The proposed use also does not change the access requirements for the site. The proposed use would require one p0-foot access way with 24-foot pavement. The existing site has three access ways of at least 30 feet with 24-foot pavement, which already meets access, egress and circulation requirements. Therefore, the parking standard is already met and no additional spaces are required. M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 14 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER a • Section 18.765.080.A: Off-street loading spaces. The applicant has not proposed a loading space or indicated that the school will need a loading space. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Section 18.390.040.E: Minimum bicycle parking requirements. This provision is addressed in the Variances and Adjustments (Chapter 18.370) section of this report. Chanter 18.795 - Visual Clearance Areas Section 18.795.020.A: When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. The change of use does not increase the on-site parking or loading requirements or change access requirements. Therefore, the provisions of this chapter do not apply, other than what has already been addressed Conditional Use (Chapter 18.330) section of this report. Chanter 18.810 - Street And Utilitv Imnrovements Standards Street and utility standards have already been addressed in the Site Development Review (Chapter 18.360) section of this report. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and has recommended the conditions below, to be satisfied prior to a final building inspection. ♦ Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of 103rd Avenue to increase the right-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. ♦ Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall trim the trees and bushes specified in the Traffic Analysis report in order to improve sight distance. • Prior to final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for the three access points. ♦ The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 103rd Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. This fee is not required if the applicant, in conjunction with the City's Finance Department, can provide evidence of the fee being paid previously. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 9590.00 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. The Engineering Department also provided the following comment: "The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary LSB). An addressing fee in the amount of $ 50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to City prior to issuance of permits. The addressing fee will only be required if the applicant is requesting a new address that is exclusive to the charter school." The Engineering department made the following recommendation: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee, if applicable to the charter school. (STAFF CONTACT: Bethany Stewart, Engineering). RESPONSE: Detailed comments are included in the case file and incorporated into the report. The M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 15 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • applicable conditions of approvhave been included in the staff recommendation. 4 The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and recommended the following condition of approval: Building erm.ts are required for the change of use. Plans shall indicate all 8 classrooms and their existing facilities. RESPONSE: The applicant is required to obtain a building permit for the change of occupancy. The recommended condition of approval has been included in the staff recommendation. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: "The fire district has no conditions of approval for this proposal. We do have issues with the property owners doing building modifications without the benefit of an appropriate plan review and the issuance of the required permits." RESPONSE: TVF&R's concern has been addressed by the condition of approval recommended by the City of Tigard Building Division. PREPMMb BY: ' 'DATE ssistant P anner r -/I q . ~ vl~ APPROVED BY! Richard H. Bewersdor / DATE Planning Manager J M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL PAGE 16 OF 16 CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 8/21/06 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER I I m `k~M TERR- ~t CANTERBURYLN J ok 'a MURDOCK ST f ~ BEP 8 LL %po Q4 DELMONTE "DR ;ommunity Development l Ii 1E~ST I. L-L r-1 Li QRD CK BEEF Tigard Area Map N' ri 0 100 200 300 400 Feet. 1'= 311 feet _ v C Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 I (503) 639-4171 httpJ/www.ci.tigard.or.us Plot date: Jul 27, 2006; C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR CITY of TIGARD G/} E'~O OR APHID-1 N1 FO''1R~MM1 AATION SYSTEM , y yCIM''~~ 1 M CUP2006-00002 VAR2006-00069 M.I.T.C.H. GJARTER SCHOOL ,~RSfERR , i r 1.c. t , 1 i i T C Is..d t q 'e ~:PF 2. R 1 I' $ P Presbvterian Church Robert Gray ~7 n g ~'l 10445 S.W. Canterbury Lane Partners t i Tigard, Oregon 97224-4811 K. I b y \ s _ • s 10 s~~ V i 6 ~ ►b ~ i 1 p I(^ 1 ~ . Vol I I STAFF/APPLICANT CORRESPONDENCE > RELATIVE TO THE APPLICATION ~ M.I.T.C.H. Charter School ~ CUP2006-00002NAR2006-00069 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Emily Eng - RE: MITCH- Landscaping percentage ~u R • From: "Ed Murphy" <MurphyE@paraticompany.com> To: "Emily Eng" <Emily@tigard-or.gov> Date: 8/11/2006 10:30:25 AM Subject: RE: MITCH- Landscaping percentage I may not be able to get to it today. I saw that in 2000 the church added landscaping behind the new addition, and also beefed up the landscaping all along the north property line, so I think it is safe to assume that they complied in 2000. If you visited the site, you saw that it is beautifully and abundantly landscaped. It is probably not terribly important it is to know the exact percentage in this case, since it would be a safe assumption that they meet the standards. Ed From: Emily Eng [mailto:Emily@tigard-or.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 5:38 PM To: Ed Murphy Subject: RE: MITCH- Landscaping percentage That's the problem. It's not clear from the old decisions what the actual landscape percentage was. In 1994, it was conditioned to be 36.8%. I'm assuming it was met, if they got building permits, but it's not indicated in any records. In any case, that percentage must have changed somewhat in 2000 and it's not indicated in the 2000 file. Anyway, I just thought I'd ask. I have to have the hearing packet sent out by Monday with whatever information I have by tomorrow. -Emily "Ed Murphy" <MurphyE@paraticompany.com> 08/10 4:33 PM • Emily - What is the difference between the two percentages? Sounds like the same thing. That will take a little time to figure out, since we did not create the site plan. The last CUP was approved in 2000, and the landscaping was approved at that time. MITCH is not changing the site at all, nor doing anything that would change the landscaping requirements. Couldn't you just state that the landscaping plan was approved in 2000 when the building was expanded, and MITCH is not changing the building or the site, and therefore it meets the landscaping requirements? Page 1 Ed I Err y Eng - RE: MITCH- Landscaping percentage From: Emily Eng [mailto:Emily@tigard-or.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 3:46 PM To: Ed Murphy Subject: MITCH- Landscaping percentage Ed, I need the know: -the percentage of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas that is landscaped -the percentage of the gross site area that is landscaped I can't find it in the application and it's not clear from previous approvals on the site. Thanks, Emily - - _ Page 2 Emily Eng - RE: MITCH- Landscaping percentage Page _1 From: "Ed Murphy" <MurphyE@paraticompany.com> To: "Emily Eng" <Emily@tigard-or.gov> Date: 8/10/2006 4:34:21 PM Subject: RE: MITCH- Landscaping percentage Emily - What is the difference between the two percentages? Sounds like the same thing. That will take a little time to figure out, since we did not create the site plan. The last CUP was approved in 2000, and the landscaping was approved at that time. MITCH is not changing the site at all, nor doing anything that would change the landscaping requirements. Couldn't you just state that the landscaping plan was approved in 2000 when the building was expanded, and MITCH is not changing the building or the site, and therefore it meets the landscaping requirements? Ed From: Emily Eng [mailto:Emily@tigard-or.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 3:46 PM To: Ed Murphy Subject: MITCH- Landscaping percentage Ed, I need the know: -the percentage of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas that is landscaped -the percentage of the gross site area that is landscaped I can't find it in the application and it's not clear from previous approvals on the site. Thanks, Emily Emily Eng Verification of MITCH enrollment Page,1 From: "Ed Murphy" <MurphyE@paraticompany.com> To: "Emily Eng" <Emily@tigard-or.gov> Date: 8/10/2006 1:52:19 PM Subject: RE: Verification of MITCH enrollment Hi Emily. Sometimes we are talking about what MITCH expects enrollment to be next year, and sometimes we are talking about what it might be some time in the future. Since the future enrollment is very uncertain, and there is presently no room for K-8, let's go with the following: K-7 8 classrooms, with one per grade. 20 students per classroom = 160 students. 1 teacher per classroom, plus a music teacher, an art teacher, a PE teacher and an Ass't teacher = 12 teachers. 2 office staff. 1 principal. The lower floor area of the church will be remodeled to create two more classrooms on the west side, so there will be a total of 8 classrooms. Ed From: Emily Eng [mailto:Emily@tigard-or.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 11:50 AM To: Ed Murphy Subject: Verification of MITCH enrollment Ed, The application gives conflicting numbers for grades, enrollment & classrooms. It says that MITCH is K-8, then states it will be using 8 classrooms. I only see 6 on the floor plan, and 4 rooms that are not labeled classrooms. Also, later in the narrative it says MITCH is K-7, but doesn't give number of students. In the neighborhood meeting, it says 160 students at 20 per class but doesn't specify grades. In the traffic study, it says K-5 for the first 2 years. Also, the number of staff is stated at 12 teachers and 2 support staff and then later at 8 teachers and 3 support staff. Is it safe to assume MITCH is going to house the maximum enrollment (198 and 9 grades/classrooms (K-8)) on the Calvin site? How many teachers and support staff would there be? Thanks, Emily Emily Eng - [POSSIBLE_SPAM] RE: [POSSIBLESPAM] RE: MITCH Page 1 From: Kim Mcmillan To: Ed Murphy Date: 8/9/2006 3:41:28 PM Subject: [POSSIBLE_SPAM] RE: [POSSIBLE_SPAM] RE: MITCH Terrific. Thanks for supplying the additional data needed. Kim "Ed Murphy" <MurphyE@paraticompany.com> 08/09 3:27 PM Hi again. I went out to the site and measured some of the dimensions this afternoon. The planter strip on 103rd is 30" wide, from the inside of the sidewalk to the back of the curb. There are no street trees within the planter strip, but there are 8 street trees behind the sidewalk. The planter strip on Canterbury is 10' wide. There are two street trees within the planter strip, and another tree that is actually a parking lot tree but which functions like a street tree because the branches overhang the sidewalk. I measured the street width of 103rd at roughly 33'-7" (but it may be 34') from curb to curb along that portion of 103rd that is improved with curb and sidewalk on both sides. In the part that has a sidewalk only on the west side, it is 27' from curb to edge of pavement. Canterbury is 32' wide, curb to curb. The right-of-way of 103rd is 50', according to the tax assessor's map, and according to the construction drawings submitted for the church parking lot (completed in 2003, 1 think, after getting a Conditional Use Permit. It is across 103rd from the church, on tax lot 2S1 1 11 BC, tax lot 400.) The right of way for Canterbury is 55', 30' on the north side and 25' on the south side, according to the tax assessor's map. Hope this helps Ed Ed Murphy Comprehensive Planning Manager direct line: 503-352-1136 cell phone: 503-314-0677 e-mail: murr)hve(cDldcdesian.com LDC Design Group 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 t: 503.858.4242 f: 503.645.5500 e: hillsboro cDldcdesian.com w: www.ldcdesign.com Emily Eng^ [POSSIBLE_SPAM] RE [POSSIBLE_SPAM] RE:_MITCH OR: Hillsboro, Tillamook I WA: Vancouver, Bellevue I ID: Coeur d' Alene CA: Sacramento I FL: Clermont DISCLAIMER: This message is intended for the sole use of the individual to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose, or distribute to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete this message. -----Original Message----- From: Kim Mcmillan rmailto:KimO)tioard-or.oovl Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 11:20 AM To: Ed Murphy Subject: [POSSIBLE_SPAM] RE: MITCH Ed, It would be great if someone actually field verifies. Thanks, Kim "Ed Murphy" <Mun)hvE0_r)araticompanv.com> 08/09 10:43 AM Thanks Kim. I know that the sidewalk on the north side of Canterbury is 6' wide, and the sidewalk on the west side of 103rd is 5' wide. Not sure about the street widths and planter strips ...I will get back to you soon on those dimensions. We will check the r/w widths again. Ed Ed Murphy Comprehensive Planning Manager direct line: 503-352-1136 cell phone: 503-314-0677 e-mail: murohve )Idcdesion.com LDC Design Group 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 t: 503.858.4242 f: 503.645.5500 e: hillsboroO-Idcdesion.com w: www.ldcdesion.com OR: Hillsboro, Tillamook I WA: Vancouver, Bellevue I ID: Coeur d' Alene CA: Sacramento I FL: Clermont DISCLAIMER: This message is intended for the sole use of the Emily E99-7 [POSSIBLE_SPAM] RE: [FOSS[BLE_SPAMj RE; MITCH _ individual to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose, or distribute to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete this message. -----Original Message----- From: Kim Mcmillan fmailto:Kim ..tiaard-or.oov Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 10:16 AM To: Ed Murphy; Ed Murphy Cc: Dick Bewersdorff; Emily Eng Subject: MITCH Ed, I'm trying to wrap up the staff report, but the information provided with regards to streets is inadequate. There is conflicting ROW information for 103rd and the pavement widths are incorrect. Also, need to know the planter strip and sidewalk widths in order to have proper findings and conclusions that don't lead to additional improvements. Thank you, Kim Page 3 CC: Emily Eng RESIDENTS, AGENCIES > & OTHER STAFF COMMENTS ~ M.I.T.C.H. Charter School ~ CUP2006-00002/VAR2006-00069 Emily Eng - M.I.T.C.H. Charter School CUP 2006-00002 Page 1 From: "Dalby, John K." <John.Dalby@tvfr.com> To: "Emily Eng" <Emily@tigard-or.gov> Date: 8/8/2006 9:06:50 AM Subject: M.I.T.C.H. Charter School CUP 2006-00002 The fire district has no conditions of approval for this proposal. We do have issues with the property owners doing building modifications without the benefit of an appropriate plan review and the issuance of the required permits. John K. Dalby, Deputy Fire Marshal II Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, North Division 14480 SW Jenkins Road Beaverton, OR 97005-1152 503-356-4723 CC: <brianb@tigard-or.gov>, <gary@tigard-or.gov> 0 q REQUEST FOR COMMENTS `l ([I CS ~l Zl~ DATE: Tuly 28.2006 TO: Brian Blalock. Commercial Plans Examiner FROM: Citv of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Ernily Eng. Assistant Planner (x2712) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 Email: EmilwatiQard-or.2ov CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2006-00002/ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2006-00069 ➢ M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL Q REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit to allow the M.I.T.C.H Charter School to occupy classroom space in the Calvin Presbyterian Church. NU.T.C.H is K-8 and has approximately 198 students. The school will lease the lower level of the church, which has 8 classrooms and a commons area. The school will also have access to a fenced playground on site. The applicant does not propose any, changes to the church exterior or site. In addition, the applicant requests an adjustment to the bicycle parking standarf 6 spaces per classroom. The applicant desires to reduce the required number of bicycle parking spaces from 48 to 6. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; Washington County Tax Map 2S 111BC, Tax Lot 2800. ZONE: R-3.5: Low Density Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a mm=um lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.330,18.360,18.390,18.510,18.705, 18.725,18.745,18.755,18.765,18.780,18.790,18.795, and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From information supplied by various departments and aggencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 11. 2006. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date. please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments m writm' 'as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: POLI7 1%s A )e-C-- A C- Q 0/rl-L~ G b/^N G` Off' USG P~~~s S1-14 c e- Ilu-P i c 4 r ,4 1- I Name & Number of Person(s) Commenting: 1179 114 tv f Z 4_4~_o C r 4 X T 2 FS_ 0 • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: July 28. 2006 TO: Tim Wolf. Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer FROM: Citv of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: EmilvEng. Assistant Planner (x2712) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 Email: Emilvatiaard-or.gov i I79 AU o CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2006-00002/ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2006-00069 ➢ M.I.T.C.H. CHARTER SCHOOL Q REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit to allow the M.I.T.CH Charter School to occupy classroom space in the Calvin Presbyterian Church. M.I.T.C i is K-8 and has approximately 198 students. The school will lease the lower level of the church, which has 8 classrooms and a commons area. The school will also have access to a fenced playground on site. The applicant does not propose any changes to the church exterior or site. In addition, the applicant requests an adjustment to the bicycle parking standard of 6 spaces per classroom. The applicant desires to reduce the required number of bicycle parking spaces from 48 to 6. LOCATION: 10445 SW Canterbury Lane; Washington County Tax Map 2S 111BC, Tax Lot 2800. ZONE: R-3.5: Low Density Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 11. 2006. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below. I Name & Number of Person(s) Commenting: w6~ ~Z-0-10 1 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: 8/7/06 TO: Emily Eng, Assistant Planner FROM: Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer RE: CUP2006-00002 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School -0 Access Manaqement (Section 18.705.030.1-1) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. CTS Engineers submitted a Traffic Analysis report, dated August 2, 2006, for this project. The report addresses sight distance for the three access points on site. Canterbury Lane was assumed to have a designated speed limit of 25 mph, which requires 250 feet of sight distance. The engineer states that 103rd Avenue is posted 35 mph, requiring 350 feet of sight distance. Staff found that 103`d Avenue has a posted speed limit of 25 mph. This is posted just south of the intersection with McDonald Street. Also, the City's Speed Control Board Orders do not indicate a 35 mph posting on 103`d Avenue. The report states that the westernmost driveway on Canterbury Lane has sight distance to the east that exceeds 250 feet. By trimming a bush on the site the sight distance can be increased to almost 500 feet, providing a clear view to the intersection at Murdock. The sight distance to the west is limited to 190 feet by a bush at the base of a tree along the side of Canterbury Lane. The engineer states that the sight distance will be adequate if this bush is trimmed. The report also states the main driveway on Canterbury Lane has clear sight distance to the intersection with 103rd Avenue, approximately 190 feet. This is a tee intersection where Canterbury Lane terminates. Sight distance to the west exceeds 250 feet, measured 10 feet back from the edge of curb. Further, the report indicates the driveway located on 103rd Avenue has a sight distance to the north that exceeds 360 feet. Sight distance to the south is limited to 275 feet to the intersection with Canterbury Lane. However, sight distance of 350 feet can be provided by trimming the lower branches of the second and third street trees south of the driveway. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2006-00002 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School PAGE 1 4 The applicant shall trim the bushes and trees as outlined by the traffic engineer's report and restated in the above narrative. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for these three access points. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. Canterbury Lane and 103rd Avenue are classified as local streets; therefore this standard does not apply. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. This application does not propose to construct a local street along Canterbury Lane or 103rd Avenue, both local streets. This criterion is met. Street And Utilitv Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. ENGINEERING'COMMENTS CUP2006-00002 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School PAGE 2 Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a local street to have a 54 right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 103rd Avenue, which is classified as a local street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 25 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to provide 27 feet from centerline in accordance with the City's adopted TSP. T+e ' -status -that -trT2-RAW cn c + ,r +~o., „+~L~ cn foo+ ; The applicant also states that the improvements are constructed with sufficient ROW under a previous land use decision. However, the standards have changed and a Conditional Use application must meet the current standards. Therefore, the applicant shall provide ROW dedication for a total of 27 feet from centerline. 3 3 - 3'4 SW 103rd Avenue is currently improved. The applicant states there is 4Dfeet of pavement width, exceeding the 32 feet required. The dansthatweiestibin t There is an existing 2.5 foot wide planter strip and a 5 foot wide sidewalk. This does not meet the standard, but as a continuation of existing conditions the sidewalk and planter will be accepted as is with this application. The site also lies adjacent to Canterbury Lane, which is classified as a local The applieaftt-stateslhere- street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 55 feet of ROW, 30 feet of ROW north of centerline. No additional ROW is required. o K SW Canterbury Lane is currently improved. at tile, - Pa_U-r_ KeyLk width and ind it te '4 32 feet from curb to curb. There is a wider section where a pull-out occurs. There is a 10 foot wide planter strip and a minimum 6 foot wide sidewalk that is partially in the ROW and partially within an easement. No additional improvements are required. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2006-00002 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School PAGE 3 1-r 1-0 properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. This development is located at the corner of 103rd Avenue and Canterbury Lane. There are no opportunities for future streets or extensions of existing streets. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. This development is located at the corner of 103rd Avenue and Canterbury Lane. There are no opportunities for future streets or extensions of existing streets. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.6.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of- way line except: ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2006-00002 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School PAGE 4 Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. PLANNING Section 18.810.040.13.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. PLANNING Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. PLANNING Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(6) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. PLANNING Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. tes - iiwnsion The sidewalk on Y_ along 103rd Avenue is 5 feet wide and the sidewalk along Canterbury Lane is a minimum of 6 feet wide, 4%6(;*_, o h . ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2006-00002 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School PAGE 5 Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.C states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There are no proposed changes to the number of fixture units; therefore no sewer improvements are required. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.C states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this development. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2006-00002 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School PAGE 6 plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. This development application does not propose any changes to the impervious surface area; therefore additional detention will not be required. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Canterbury Lane and 103rd Avenue are not identified as bicycle facilities. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.C states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2006-00002 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School PAGE 7 conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW 103rd Avenue. The applicant states that a fee in-lieu of undergrounding was paid as a condition of CUP92-0001. Staff has been unable to substantiate that claim. If the applicant or the City's Finance Department can provide the proof that the fee was paid no further fee is required. Otherwise, the fee in-lieu is required and is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 274 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $ 9590.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND, UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Studv Findinqs: CTS Engineers submitted a Traffic Analysis report, dated August 2, 2006, for this development. The school is expected to generate approximately 174 vehicle trips during the AM peak hour and 129 trips during the mid-afternoon peak hour of the school. Based on the school's daily operating and event schedules, a negligible number of PM peak hour trips are expected. The traffic engineer concluded, based on the results of the full analysis described in the report, that the proposed charter school can be operated at the church site without adversely affecting traffic operations or safety near the site. Furthermore, key intersections and roadways in the study area will continue to operate at acceptable Levels of Service with the school's maximum enrollment of 198 students. The internal circulation system serves the site well, with driveways set far enough back from the adjacent intersections to avoid potential traffic conflicts. The engineer goes on to state that the City should consider, regardless of this application, trimming or having the property owner trim a few bushes in the landscaping that affect sight distance from the two main driveways. The trimming of bushes and trees has been required of the applicant, in a previous section of this report, as a condition of approval. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2006-00002 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School PAGE 8 Fire and Life Safetv: The fire district has no conditions of approval for this proposal. We do have issues with the property owners doing building modifications without the benefit of an appropriate plan review and the issuance of the required permits.John K. Dalby, Deputy Fire Marshal IlTualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, North Division14480 SW Jenkins RoadBeaverton, OR 97005-1152503-356-4723 Public Water Svstem: The applicant is not proposing any changes to the existing water service. Storm Water Qualitv: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The applicant has submitted copies of plans from previous land use approvals that indicate two on-site water quality facilities have been constructed. These facilities are in poor condition and provide no water quality treatment due to lack of any plantings. The applicant is not proposing any changes to the impervious surface area; therefore no improvements are required of this applicant. Address Assianments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $ 50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of permits. The addressing fee will only be required if the applicant is requesting a new address that is exclusive to the charter school. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2006-00002 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School PAGE 9 • ~r Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee, if applicable to the charter school. (STAFF CONTACT: Bethany Stewart, Engineering). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of 103rd Avenue to increase the right-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall trim the trees and bushes specified in the Traffic Analysis report in order to improve sight distance. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit final sight distance certification for the three access points. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 103rd Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. This fee is not required if the applicant, in conjunction with the City's Finance Department, can provide evidence of the fee being paid previously. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 9590.00 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2006-00002 M.I.T.C.H. Charter School PAGE 10 APPLICANT'S APPLICATION > MATERIALS M.I.T.C.H. Charter School CUP2006-00002NAR2006-00069 • APPLICANT'S STATEMENT for ,DC Design Group a Parati company "MITCH Charter School" REQUEST Major Modification to an Existing Conditional Use Permit for the Calvin Presbyterian Church APPLICANT Debi Lorence MITCH Charter School P.O. Box 230575 Tigard, Oregon 97223 OWNER Calvin Presbyterian Church 10445 SW Canterbury Lane Tigard, Oregon 97224 PREPARED BY Parati - LDC Design Group 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tax Lot: 2800 Tax Map: 2S1 11 BC City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon ZONING R-3.5 • • July 28, 2006 Emily Eng, Assistant Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 RECEIVED JUL 2 8 2006 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING RE: Conditional Use Permit for MITCH Charter School Dear Ms. Eng: Enclosed are eight copies of an application for a Major Modification to the existing Conditional Use Permit for MITCH Charter School. We previously submitted the following documents. Four copies of the preliminary CUP and Adjustment application for the completeness review; ♦ A completed application form; A check $4,938 for the Conditional Use Permit application fee; ♦ A check $301 for the Adjustment application fee; ♦ A title report; ♦ An affidavit of posting and mailing notices; A set of addressed and stamped envelopes. At this time, all of the materials are included in the application package except for the traffic analysis. We expect to submit that no later than August 4, 2006. Thank you, Emily. Sincerely, n E Murphy Comprehensive Planning Manager CC. Debi Lorence, MITCH Charter School Project File #1361.001 ,DC Design Group a Parod company 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro, OR 97124 P 503.858.4242 F 503.645.5500 E hillsboro@ldcdesign.com www.ldcdesign.com Hillsboro, OR Tillamook, OR Vancouver, WA Bellevue, WA Coeur d'Alene, ID Sacramento, CA Clermont, FL www,pa raticom pa ny.com 0 0 "MITCH CHARTER SCHOOL" .MAJOR MODIFICATION TO AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TABLE OF CONTENTS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM AND FEES APPLICANT'S STATEMENT • EXHIBITS 0 to 132- • PRE,APP. HELD BY. CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OR 97223-8189 503.639.41711503.684.7297 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION File # 1 Other Case # I Date 1 1 By 1 I Receipt # I I City ❑ Urb ❑ Date Complete TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑ Adjustment/Variance (I or II) ❑ Minor Land Partition (II) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment (IV) ❑ Planned Development (III) Conditional Use (III) ❑ Sensitive Lands Review (1, II or 111) ❑ Historic Overlay (II or III) ❑ Site Development Review (II) ❑ Zone Change (III) ❑ Zone Change Annexation (IV) ❑ Zone Ordinance Amendment (IV) ❑ Home Occupation (II) ❑ Subdivision (II or III) I Y WILL Ut;GJK (Aabress It avall-affle) 15 s~ 4-o- 1;) tk L-kPJ a I AA MAI' & I AA LU 1 NUJ. 1 c.S l II 4f.. I U I AL 51 It SILL 4UNIN(3 L;LASJIrIUA 1 IUN 3. 5 ~r/► /t ~YYLICAN 1' / 51Arftr Sc.~? oo -N+~ MAILINU AUUKCJJII:I I Y/J 1 A I I:--/4R' t'MUNt NU. d J t-AA NU. ~5b PRA. , Lacy)F'KUF'tK I Y UWNtWUt U HULUCK (Attach nst it more man one) Ndvio F ChanA MAILINU AUUKtbb/U I Y/J I Al t/LIF' I 10W4 45 SW 0"4-C . Yo "When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be purchaser of record or a lessee it possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The ners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this aoplication. 1 F'KUt-U,AL JUMMAKY (Please oe specitic) i -Kt.e 0-0 i in pws 4 rat ki ell APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS All, DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET. • • • • Mitcji Charter School CUP Modification KEY INFORMATION Project Name: Property Description: Location: Parcel Size: Legal Description: Zoning: Applicant: Property Owner: Mitch Charter School Conditional Use Permit Site is already fully developed as a church. 10445 SW Canterbury Lane, at the corner of SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103rd Street 3.53 acres 2S111BC02800 R-3.5 Mitch Charter School, Debi Lorence Calvin Presbyterian Church Applicant's Representative: 10 1 32/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 Ed Murphy, AICP LDC Design Group 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 1 0 i Mitch Charter School CUP Modification • . . MITCH Charter School intends to lease space in the lower level of Calvin Presbyterian Church for a school. The lower level of the church has eight classrooms and a commons area. The site has a fenced outdoor playground, an abundance of parking, and beautiful landscaping. MITCH's program is Kindergarten through 8th grade for 2006-2007. MITCH has only one class per grade, and expects to have a student population of 198 students. In addition, the school will have 12 teachers and 2 support staff working at the school. The site is already fully improved, and the site and the current use are very compatible with the school. MITCH students would enter through an entrance on the east side of the building that is completely separate from the main entrance into the church. Parking would be in the east parking lot, near the entrance to the school. This parking is completely separate from the parking lot used by church officials and congregants on the west side of the building. The use requires approval of a major modification to an existing Conditional Use Permit, which is the church, because the addition of a school is a change in use. However, MITCH is not proposing any changes to the building, the site, or the abutting streets. • • 10132/docs/plan/applicationn/17/06 3 0 • Mitch Charter School CUP Modification • BACKGROUND INFORMATION History: MITCH Charter School has been located in various places in Tigard and Tualatin since it was founded in 2002. It is currently operating, on a temporary basis, out of portable modules at Tigard High School. The Calvin Presbyterian Church was built in 1965, and significantly expanded in 1992, 1994 and 2000. The church property is on tax lot 2S111BC02800, a parcel at the corner of SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103rd Avenue. Please see Exhibit'1', Tax Assessor's Map. The site: The primary site is 3.53 acres in size. In addition, the church owns a parcel across SW 103rd Avenue, which it developed into a parking lot in 2002. The site does not have any wetlands or other sensitive lands on it or on any adjacent properties within 200' of the site. The site is sloped gently towards the east. Adjacent uses, The site is bordered by six single-family detached homes to the north, along SW View Terrace; a parking lot and single-family homes to the east; one house, the historic John Tigard House, and Tigard Water District property to the south; and multifamily development to the west. Please refer to Exhibit'2', Aerial Photograph. Description of Proposal. MITCH Charter School plans to operate a school in the Calvin Presbyterian Church, in the lower level of the addition constructed in 2000. They do not intend to make any improvements to the site or the building. They will be using classroom space that is already used for church-related classes. The proposed use is • very similar to the existing uses already permitted under the approved Conditional Use Permits, except that it will operate throughout the week, and is not at all associated with the primary use of the building at ail. The site is already fully improved. The existing site improvements include handicapped accessible parking near the door of the school, lighting, parking, landscaping, screening and buffering, storm water facilities, and pedestrian walkways. The adjacent streets are fully improved, including sidewalks and street trees. For photographs of the site, please refer to Exhibit '3', Site Photographs. For illustrations of the existing improvements, please refer to Exhibit '4', Architectural Elevation Drawings, and Exhibit '5', Site Plans. These drawings show the building elevations and the site plan, including the landscaping, parking, and walkways. No changes to any of the existing utilities are necessary. The site is already served with adequate sewer, water and storm water lines. Please refer to the Exhibit '6', Civil Plan, for an illustration of the existing conditions, including right-of-way and street widths, ground elevations, public utilities, storm water quality facilities, and sidewalk location and widths. The school will use the lower floor classrooms and multi-use space constructed as part of the expansion in 2000. Please refer to Exhibit '7', Lower Floor Plan. Impact Analysis. Chapter 18.390.040.B.2.e requires an impact study as part of the Type II procedure. For the most part, no improvements to the transportation, drainage, • parks, water, and sewer systems are necessary to meet City standards or to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. 10 1 32/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 MITCH Charter School CUP 0 • Following are comments regarding the impact of the proposed development on public . facilities and services. Transportation Svstem: A Preliminary Sight Distance Certification letter is attached as Exhibit '8'. This letter verifies that the design of the driveways and streets are safe because they meet adequate sight distance standards. The traffic impact is minimal. The school hours are generally off-peak, and are different from the church hours. (The traffic analysis report is attached as Exhibit'13'.) Drainaoe Svstem: The property slopes generally from the west to the east, towards SW 103rd Avenue. There are two existing water quality and detention facilities serving the site, both near SW 103rd Avenue. Parks Svstem: No impact to the park system will occur because of this proposed site development. Water Svstem: No significant impact to the water system will occur because of this proposed site development. No changes to the number or type of plumbing fixtures are planned. Sewer Svstem: No significant impact to the sewer system will occur as a result of this proposed site development. Noise impacts: The outdoor play area on the south side of the building will be used by the school, so there will be an increase in the number of children playing outside during • the week. However, the playground is separated from the adjacent properties by an 20'-wide access road, a 16 to 20-foot wide landscape strip with mature landscaping, and a 6'-high solid wood fence. In addition, the homes north of the outdoor play area have deep back yards with mature trees, which will reduce the noise impact. Liahtinq_ The existing lighting is primarily composed of lighting in the parking lots and around the perimeter of the building. There is a light near the front entry of the school. MITCH is not proposing any change to the existing lighting. Police, Fire and other Emeroencv Services: No impact to police, fire or other emergency services will occur as a result of this proposed site development. The playground is fenced on all sides, so children will not be running out into the access way or parking lot. If there were a need for emergency services, the school site is easily and quickly accessible from all directions. There will be a direct emergency vehicle access to the play area itself, through a gate, should the need ever arise. Prior Approvals and Reviews: The applicant attended a pre-application meeting with City staff on July 6, 2006. The pre-application conference notes are attached as Exhibit '9'. The church has applied for other major modifications of the Conditional Use Permit since it was built in 1965. It was significantly expanded in 1992, 1994, and 2000. (See CUP file #s 92-00001, 94-00004, and 2000-00002, respectively). The 2000 expansion included a 16,670 sq. ft. addition, for classrooms and a multipurpose room, which is the area the school will use. In 2002, it developed the property across 103rd Avenue for additional parking. The applicant will meet with the nearby property owners at a • neighborhood meeting held on July 27th, 2006. Please see Exhibit '10' for documentation of the neighborhood meeting. 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 • Mitch Charter School CUP Modification • • RESPONSE TO CUP CRITERIA Chapter 18.330 of the Tigard Development Code (hereinafter "Code") contains the standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted. Section 18.330.030 contains the approval standards, which are as follows: 18.330.030 Approval Standards and Conditions of Approval A. ADDroval Standards. The Hearings Officer shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a conditional use or to enlarge or alter a conditional use based on findings of fact with respect to each of the following criteria: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; 2. The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features; 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter; 5. The applicable requirements of 18.330.050; and 6. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. RESPONSE TO CRITERIA 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; • The site is already fully developed with a large church building, parking (including accessible parking), landscaping, lighting, fire hydrants and storm drainage facilities. The location, access, site size, existing building space and existing parking areas are a very good match for the school. Please see Exhibit '2' for an aerial photograph of the site and Exhibit '3' for photographs of the existing conditions of the site. 2. The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. There will be little, if any, negative impacts resulting from the proposed use on this site. The size, shape, location, topography and natural features of the site are perfect for the school. There is really no significant additional impact to the public facilities and transportation systems. Because this is a secondary use within a previously developed site, the impacts are minor. The existing trees and shrubs in the property will buffer and screen the playing on the outdoor playground place during recesses. Otherwise, all building. wide landscape strip along the north edge of the adjoining properties from the impacts of children equipment. Of course, this activity will only take the activities will be conducted inside of the church 10 1 32/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 7 MITCH Charter School CUP • • The existing on-site lighting does not negatively impact the neighboring properties. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. The site is already fully developed. The project is not adding plumbing fixtures or increasing the impervious area. The public sewer, storm water and water systems have adequate capacity for the proposed school. The transportation system is adequate to support the use. Other semi-public facilities and services, including electrical, natural gas, cable, and garbage disposal are available, and the addition of a school will not significantly change the impact on those services and facilities. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. The property is zoned R-3.5. Following is a summary of how the proposed use complies with the zoning district regulations. Setbacks. The setback requirements ordinarily applicable in the R-3.5 zone are superceded by Section 18.330.050.8.8 of the Development Code. The school will exceed those minimum setback requirements. The yard setbacks are: • Front yard setback - 31 feet (minimum 30 feet required) • West side yard setback - 70 feet (minimum 20 feet required). • East side yard setback - 235 feet (minimum 20 feet required) • Rear yard setback - 45 feet (minimum 30 feet required). Minimum lot size: 10,000 square feet. The property size is 153,767 square feet. Average lot width: 65 feet. The property is approximately 500 feet wide. Minimum building setbacks: Not applicable. As noted above, the setbacks for a school are established by Section 18.330.050.6.8. Maximum building setbacks: Not applicable. Maximum Building Height: 30 feet. The church building is 42 feet high including the height of the steeple. The building has already been approved by the City. Maximum percentage of lot coverage: There are no maximum lot coverage limits. Minimum percentage of site landscaping: There are no minimum site landscaping requirements. Streets: The property fronts on SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103rd Avenue. Canterbury Lane has 55 ft. of existing right-of-way, which includes 36 ft. of pavement, 6 ft. sidewalks and three-foot wide planter strip. 103rd Avenue has 50 ft. of existing right- of-way, including 40 ft. of pavement and 6 ft.-wide sidewalks. Pedestrian and handicapped accessibility: The school is handicapped accessible. There is a walkway from SW 103rd through the parking lot to the church, which connects to the church building close to the school entrance. The school is also handicapped 8 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 • Mitch Charter School CUP Modification • accessible from SW Canterbury Lane. In addition, there is an elevation inside the building that will provide an alternative route to the classroom space. Handicapped parking:, Accessible parking is already available near the entrance to the school, which meets the accessibility standards set forth in the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code. Bicycle parking: The Code requires six spaces per classroom, which for eight classrooms would mean 48 bicycle parking spaces. There are currently six bicycle parking spaces on the site, which will be sufficient for the demand. This application is accompanied by a request for an adjustment to the minimum bicycle parking requirement. Utilities: All utilities meet City standards, except for the overhead wires along SW 103rd Avenue. All on-site utilities are underground. A fee in lieu of undergrounding was paid as a condition of the 1992 expansion, CUP 92-0001. Parking lot landscaping: The parking lot is fully landscaped. Parking lot lighting: The parking lot is already fully lit. Buffering and Screening: The site is buffered and screened from adjoining residential properties, particularly those to the north, where any impacts would be the greatest. 5. The applicable requirements of 18.330.050. is Section 18.330.050 contains additional development standards for certain conditional use types, such as schools, adult entertainment, vehicle fuel storage, etc. There are special setbacks applicable to schools, which are: • Front - 30 feet • Side - 20 feet • Rear - 30 feet The church building exceeds those standards. 6. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. The following information addresses the supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of the Code. Chapter 18.360 Site Development Review: Many of the submission requirements and development standards applicable to a Conditional Use Permit application are the same as for a Site Development Review application, and addressing both sections of the Code is somewhat duplicative. Nonetheless, following are responses to the application sections of Chapter 18.360. 18.360.090 Approval Criteria • A. Approval criteria. The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application: 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 9 MITCH Charter School CUP • • 1. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title including Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Standards; ( Response: The proposed use of the site complies with all of the applicable requirements of the Development Code, including Chapter 18.810. 2. Relationship to the natural and physical environment: a. Buildings shall be: (1) Located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; (2) Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; (3) Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and (4) Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Response: This criterion is not applicable because .it applies to new buildings. The proposal is utilizing an existing building. b. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. Response: No. trees are proposed for removal. 3. Exterior elevations: a. Along the vertical face of single-family attached and multiple-family structures, offsets shall occur at a minimum of every 30 feet by providing any two of the following: (1) Recesses, e.g., decks, patios, entrances, floor area, of a minimum depth of eight feet; (2) Extensions, e.g., decks, patios, entrances, floor area, of a minimum depth of eight feet, a maximum length of an overhang shall be 25 feet; and (3) Offsets or breaks in roof elevations of three or more feet in height. Response: This criterion is not applicable because it applies to new buildings. The proposal is utilizing an existing building. 4. Buffering, screening and compatibility between adjoining uses: a. Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses, for example, between single-family and multiple-family residential, and residential and commercial uses, and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer: (1) The purpose of the buffer, for example to decrease noise levels, absorb air pollution, filter dust, or to provide a visual barrier; (2) The size of the buffer required to achieve the purpose in terms of (6 width and height; 10 10132/docs/plan/applicadonn/17/06 • • Mitch Charter School CUP Modification • (3) The direction(s) from which buffering is needed; (4) The required density of the buffering; and (5) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. Response: This conditional use permit for the church required buffering and screening from the adjoining uses. There is a 16-20-foot wide landscape strip along the northern boundary of the site that is fully landscaped with mature landscaping. In addition, there is a 6'- high solid wood fence along the property line directly behind the church building, and a 5'-high wood fence along the remainder of the property between the church building and SW 103rd Avenue. b. On site screening from view from adjoining properties of such things as service areas, storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air cooling and heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: (1) What needs to be screened; (2) The direction from which it is needed; (3) How dense the screen needs to be; (4) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile; and (5) Whether the screening needs to be year around. Response: The recycling and solid waste disposal area is currently located on the north end of the • west parking lot, in the northwest corner of the site. It consists of two large dumpsters. They are not visible from the adjoining homes, but they are visible front Canterbury Lane when looking to the north along the aisle of the westside parking lot. Because of the distance from the street and the small viewing opportunity, they are not particularly noticeable to the public. 5. Privacy and noise: multi-family or group living uses: a. Structures which include residential dwelling units shall provide private outdoor areas for each ground floor unit which is screened from view by adjoining units as provided in Subsection 6.a below; b. The buildings shall be oriented in a manner which protects private spaces on adjoining properties from view and noise; c. On-site uses which create noise, light, or glare shall be buffered from adjoining residential uses; and d. Buffers shall be placed on the site as necessary to mitigate noise, light or glare from off-site sources. Response: This criterion is not applicable because the use is not residential. 6. Private outdoor area: multi-family use: a. Private open space such as a patio or balcony shall be provided and shall be designed for the exclusive use of individual units and shall be at least 48 square feet in size with a minimum width dimension of four feet; and • (1) Balconies used for entrances or exits shall not be considered as open space except where such exits or entrances are for the sole use of the unit; and 10 1 32/docs/plan/applicationn/1 7/06 11 MITCH Charter School CUP • • (2) Required open space may include roofed or enclosed structures such as a recreation center or covered picnic area. b. Wherever possible, private outdoor open spaces should be oriented toward the sun; and c. Private outdoor spaces shall be screened or designed to provide privacy for the users of the space. Response: This criterion is not applicable because the use is not residential. 2. Shared outdoor recreation areas: multi-family use: a. In addition to the requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, usable outdoor recreation space shall be provided in residential developments for the shared or common use of all the residents in the following amounts: (1) Studio up to and including two-bedroom units, 200 square feet per unit; and (2) Three or more bedroom units, 300 square feet per unit. b. The required recreation space may be provided as follows: (1) It may be all outdoor space; or (2) It may be part outdoor space and part indoor space; for example, an outdoor tennis court, and indoor recreation room; or (3) It may be all public or common space; or (4) It may be part common space and part private; for example, it could be an outdoor tennis court, indoor recreation room and balconies on each unit; and (5) Where balconies are added to units, the balconies shall not be less than 48 square feet. c. Shared outdoor recreation space shall be readily observable to promote crime prevention and safety; Response: This criterion is not applicable because the use is not residential. 8. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/ bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/ bicycle plan. Response: 1 J ItIi \..1s cr1{.IiteriIon is not L applicable Vct. bec M11- f41n 11Q~ IC not %AFJf-k1n nr mrlimf not fr% *Mc 1 nn_.,cmr TLI 41UJG ulc uJt:: IJ IIVI V-11111 VI -Jut.t.I1% w ult. 1VV ,t.M. floodplain. 9. Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: a. The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility; and Is b. These areas may be defined by, but not limited to: 12 10132/docs/plan/applicationn/17/06 • • Mitch Charter School CUP Modification • (1) A deck, patio, low wall, hedge, or draping vine; (2) A trellis or arbor; (3) A change in elevation or grade; (4) A change in the texture of the path material; (5) Sign; or (6) Landscaping. Response: The site is already fully improved with buildings and landscaping. The main entrance to the school is very visible from the parking lot. 10.Crime prevention and safety: a. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; b. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; c. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; d. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and e. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. • Response: The lower floor of the existing building, where the school will be, has windows which provide a view out to the play area, which is fenced in. This allows a parent, teacher or office worker inside of the building to monitor the playground activities. The existing lighting in the parking lot and at the entrance to the school provide sufficient lighting for the school use. 11.Public transit: a. Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to or within 500 feet of existing or proposed transit route; b. The requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: (1) The location of other transit facilities in the area; and (2) The size and type of the proposal. c. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: (1) Bus stop shelters; (2) Turnouts for buses; and (3) Connecting paths to the shelters. Response: The site is within 1,500 feet of Pacific Highway, which is a transit route. There are sidewalks along both sides of most of Canterbury Lane between the site and Pacific • Highway. 10132/docs/plan/applicationnn 7/06 13 MITCH Charter School CUP • • 12.Landscaping: a. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745; b. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and c. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. Response: The existing landscaping is sufficient for the school use. No additional landscape materials need to be added. 13.Drainage: All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan; Response: The drainage from the site flows into two storm water quality swales and detention facilities. These were approved in 1994 for the church use. The school use is not adding additional impervious surface. 14.Provision for the disabled: All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447; and Response: • There are two accessible parking stalls near the entrance to the school. There is an accessible pedestrian access to the door in the northeast corner of the building from SW Canterbury lane. 15.AI1 of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. (Ord. 02-33) Response: The provisions of the underlying R-3.5 zone are met to the fullest extent practicable for a previously developed site which will house a secondary use. Chapter 18.705 Access, Egress and Circulation: The most applicable section is 18.705.030.F, "Required walkway location." A walkway already extends from SW Canterbury Lane to the school entrance. The walkway does not cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, and it is marked with pavement markings or contrasting pavement materials. The sidewalks on the adjacent street are already in place, and range from five to six feet wide. There is a ramp to the secondary entrance to the school (at the northeast corner of the building). There is another walkway through the parking lot from SW 103rd Avenue to the church building. Section 18.705.030.1-1.1. requires an access report for all new development proposals which verifies that the design of the driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate 14 10132/docs/plan/applicationn/17/06 • • Mitch Charter School CUP Modification • stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards. A letter from Howard Roll, P.E., a transportation engineer, is attached as Exhibit'8'. Section 18.705.030.H.2. requires a minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection of 150 feet, "measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway". SW 103rd Avenue is not a collector or arterial street, so this requirement is not applicable to that street. SW Canterbury is listed as a minor collector. The driveway to the parking lot is set back 175 feet from that intersection. Chapter 18.710 Accessory Residential Units: The Chapter is not applicable. Chapter 18.715 Density Computations: The Chapter is not applicable. Chapter 18.720 Design Compatibility Standards: The Chapter is not applicable. Chapter 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards: This Chapter applies the federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations to development within the City of Tigard. • Noise. Section 7.40.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code applies. The only noise emanating from the school will be typical children's playground noise. • Visible emissions. There will not be any visible emissions from this use. • • Vibration. There will not be any vibrations emanating from play area that will be discernible without instruments at the property line. • Odors. There will not be any odorous gases or other matter generated from the use in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line. • Glare and heat. There will be no direct or sky-reflected glare visible at the property line, or any emission or transmission of heat or heated air, which will be discernible at the property line. • Insects and rodents. All wastes will be stored in closed containers, and the grounds will be maintained in a manner that will not attract or aid in the propagation of insects or rodents or create any type of health hazard. Chapter 18.730 Exceptions to Development Standards: This Chapter is not applicable. Chapter 18.740 Historic Overlay: This Chapter is not applicable. Chapter 18.742 Home Occupations: This Chapter is not applicable. Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening: This chapter is applicable. The site is already developed with a 16 to 20-foot wide landscape strip along the north property line, which is fully landscaped with mature landscaping. In addition, there is a 6-foot high solid wood fence along the north property line from the northwest corner of the site • to a point about 300 feet from that corner. Beyond that, there is a 5-foot high fence all the way to the northeast corner of the site. 10 1 32/docs/plan/appl icationn/1 7/06 15 MITCH Charter School CUP • 0 Chapter 18.745.040 Street Trees: The site is already developed with street trees on both SW 103rd Avenue and SW Canterbury Lane. Chapter 18.745.050 Buffering and screening: The buffering and screening matrix (Table 18.745.1) does not show a requirement for buffering and screening between abutting residential uses. However, there is already buffering and screening in place along the north property line, consisting of a 16-20-foot wide landscape strip and a 6'- high fence. This standard meets the D-1 standard on Table 18.745.2, which is the same standard as would be required between a new commercial use and existing single-family detached homes. Screening and landscaping of the parking lot, service facilities and refuse containers is required, and is provided. The refuse container and recycling area is in the northwest corner of the site. The parking lot is screened by the landscaping in the planter strip. Chapter 18.750 Manufactured/ Mobile Home Regulations: This Chapter is not applicable. Chapter 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage: This Chapter is applicable. A school, as an institutional use, is required to have 10 square feet of storage area, plus another 4 square feet for every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area under subsection C., "minimum standards method". There is already a solid waste and recycling area in the northwest corner of the site, which will meet the needs of the school use. A letter from Pride Disposal Company is attached as Exhibit'11'. Chapter 18.760 Nonconforming Situations: The building on the property conforms to the current setback, height and other dimensional requirements. Chapter 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements Vehicular oarkina: The design of the parking lots meets the regulations of this Chapter in terms of landscaping, lighting, drainage, pedestrian access, width of access aisles, and disabled-accessible parking. The existing parking lot on the east side of the building has 103 spaces, including 5 handicapped-accessible spaces. The number of off-street parking spaces is sufficient. The Development Code requires a minimum of 2 spaces per classroom (totaling 16 spaces in this case) for a school use. The church and the school use of the buildings are off-set in terms of hours of operation, so the parking is more than sufficient to meet the needs of the school. Bicvcle oarkinq: The existing development show one bicycle parking rack near the front door of the church. The Code requires 6 bicycle parking spaces per classroom for a school. The school has 8 classrooms, therefore a total of 48 bicycle parking spaces are required. The applicant will install additional bicycle parking spaces, but is requesting a variance for the number of spaces required. Chapter 18.775 Sensitive Lands: There are no sensitive lands affected by this proposal. Chapter 18.780 Signs: The applicant is not proposing any new signs. Chapter 18.785 Temporary uses: This Chapter is not applicable. • 16 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 0 Mitch Charter School CUP Modification • Chapter 18.790 Tree removal: No trees are being removed. Chapter 18.795 Visual Clearance Areas: The site meets the visual clearance requirements of Section 18.795.040.6 of this chapter. (See letter from Howard Roil, Transportation Engineer, attached as Exhibit'8'). Chapter 18.797 Water Resources (WR) Overlay District: This Chapter is not applicable. Chapter 18.798 Wireless Communication Facilities: This Chapter is not applicable. Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards: SW 103rd Avenue is developed to full city standards (40-feet pavement width, with sidewalks along both sides) and sufficient right-of-way (60') has already been dedicated. SW Canterbury Lane is fully developed (36-foot pavement width within a 50-foot right-of-say. The preliminary site plan does not include any dedication of right-of-way along either street, or any street improvements. At the pre-application meeting, the Development Review Engineer stated that the City standard for SW 103rd Avenue would be a 54-foot wide right-of-way. There is currently 50 feet of right-of-way. Since the 50' right-of-way was sufficient when the previous Conditional Use Permits were approved (as recently as 2000), and full street improvements have already been made, no additional right-of-way should be required. Utilities have been addressed earlier in this application. No improvements to the • existing utilities appear to be necessary. The applicant is not increasing the number of plumbing fixture units, so the public sewer system is not impacted by the new use of this property. The applicant is not increasing the amount of impervious surface, so the storm drainage system is not impacted by this use. The site is already served with fire hydrants. See Exhibit '12', letter from the Fire Chief. A traffic analysis of the impact of the proposed school on the transportation system has been completed, and is attached as Exhibit'13'. The site is served by two storm water quality and retention basins, which are shown on the site plan drawings (Exhibit 'S') and the Civil Plan (Exhibit 6'). Clean Water Services provided a Service Provider Letter. Please refer to Exhibit '14'. • 10132/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 17 r • Mitch Charter School CUP Modification • Background. Chapter 18.765 of the Code sets forth the standards for bicycle parking. Specifically, Table 18.765.2 requires a minimum of six parking spaces per classroom. There are 8 regular classrooms. That means the District would have to install 48 bicycle-parking spaces to meet the Code requirements. Since the school is new to its location, there are no records on the number of bicycles ridden to school. Further, the school is a charter school, not a neighborhood school. Students will generally not live within bicycle riding distance from the school. Similarly, the teachers generally live outside of the area. Therefore, the demand for bicycle parking space is very low. Proposal. The Applicant supports bicycle usage, and plans to install 6 bicycle spaces at this school, near the school entry door. This is much less than the 48 spaces the Development Code requires, but will be more than enough to meet the demand for bicycle parking. Response to Adjustment Criteria. Section 18.370.020.C.7.e. allows the Director to approve an adjustment of the required bicycle parking by means of a Type II procedure if the applicant "can demonstrate that the proposed use by its nature would be reasonably anticipated to generate a lesser need for bicycle parking." Although generally one would expect kindergarten through 7th grade schools to generate bicycle traffic, charter schools are dissimilar to other types of grade and middle schools that serve students in the neighborhood in which they live. • Although the Director may approve an adjustment, this application also reviewed the criteria for a variance, found in Chapter 18.370 of the Code. Responses to each of the variance criterion are as follows: a. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; The "purposes of this title" (18.110.020) include only one purpose statement that is directly relevant, which is #8: "Provide for and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system within the City". Since Mitch Charter School does not have a geographically defined district boundary and draws students from a large area, many students travel great distances to school. Bicycling long distances to school would be neither safe nor convenient for school-age children. Children who happen to live near the school can walk or ride a bicycle; however, most children will be driven to school by their parents. The number of children expected to ride a bicycle to school is very limited - out of approximately 198 students, perhaps only 1 or 2 will regularly ride their bicycles to school. If over time, the demand for more bicycle parking increases significantly, the School can relatively easily provide additional bicycle parking spaces. On the other hand, if the School installed 48 bicycle spaces, and only a few are actually used, it becomes wasted space and a nuisance. Granting the adjustment will not be materially detrimental to the provision of a safe, convenient and economic transportation system within the City of Tigard. Nor will it be • materially detrimental to any other applicable standards or policies, or to any other properties in the R-3.5 zone or in the vicinity of the school. Most importantly, granting the adjustment, and requiring 6 instead of 48 bicycle parking spaces, will not impact the 10132/docs/plan/applicationn/17/06 19 MITCH Charter School CUP 0 0 surrounding neighborhood. That is, it is not likely that children would leave their bicycles on someone else's property because they could not find a parking space on the church property. b. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; The special circumstance is that this elementary school is not a neighborhood public school. Many of the school's students do not live with bicycle-riding range. Further, based on the actual experience in other schools in Tigard, the requirement of six bicycle spaces per classroom is excessive. How many children ride to school depends on how safe their parents think their children are, how far away from school they live, what type of bicycle facilities exist along the route to school, and even whether or not the child has a bicycle. The School has no control over these variables. However, experience clearly suggests that the demand for bicycle parking spaces will not be anywhere near six per classroom, which in this case represents about one bicycle parking space for every three students. c. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting reasonable economic use of the land; The proposed use is an elementary/middle school, which is a permitted use, subject to approval of a Major Modification to the existing Conditional Use Permit for the church. The other city standards will be maintained (other than those for which a variance or adjustment is granted). Installing 6 bicycle stalls can be reasonably accommodated within the site of the existing church. Installing 48 stalls, however, is problematic in terms of space availability, as it would consume a substantial amount of land currently used as landscaping and automobile parking, and more importantly, would not benefit the children, their parents or the teachers and staff. d. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were developed as specified in the title; Existing physical and natural systems are not affected. In fact, the adverse effects on traffic and drainage would be greater if the School were to install 48 spaces. By installing 6 spaces, the School will not have to convert land currently used as landscaping and automobile circulation. e. The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance, which would alleviate the hardship. The hardship is not self-imposed. The school is not claiming that there is no room on the site for 48 bicycle parking spaces (although space is certainly an issue, given the constraints of the site), or that there is some physical reason why it cannot be done. It is claiming that the number of bicycle parking spaces required is much greater than the need, and that installing the required number of spaces takes up valuable space that could be better used for other activities, and requires the use of financial resources that could be better used for other improvements. It creates a hardship on the school because of the amount of space such facilities would require and because of the on- going maintenance requirements of those facilities. a 20 10 13 2/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 • • Mitch Charter School CUP Modification • • • The application for a Major Modification to an approved Conditional Use Permit to allow MITCH Charter School to operate within the Calvin Presbyterian Church building should be approved. It is an ideal partnership between the school and the church, and a great use of the existing building and site. The impacts resulting from the proposed use to the public transportation and utility systems, and to the surrounding neighborhood residents, are minor. No changes are necessary to the site, the church building, or the adjacent streets and utilities. The site and adjoining streets have already been improved as a condition of previous expansions to the church facilities, the latest being the addition of the classrooms and multipurpose room in 2000. The adjustment to the bicycle parking requirements is warranted because The application meets the criteria of the Conditional Use Permit section of the Development Code and the Site Development. • • 10 1 32/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 21 0 • Mich Charter School CUP Modification Exhibit'1' Tax assessor's map showing the location and dimensions of the tax lot Exhibit ' 2' Aerial photograph Exhibit ' T Site Photographs Exhibit ' 4' Architectural Elevation Drawings Exhibit ' 5' Site Plans Exhibit V Civil Plan (grading and utilities) Exhibit ' 7' Lower Floor Plan Exhibit ' 8' Sight clearance certification letter Exhibit' 9' Pre-application conference notes Exhibit' 10' Neighborhood meeting documentation Exhibit ' 11' Letter from Pride Disposal Company • Exhibit ' 12' Letter from Fire Chief Exhibit ' 13' Traffic Impact Analysis Exhibit' 14' Clean Water Services Service Provider Letter • 10 1 32/docs/plan/application/7/17/06 23 r ( \ y y Y; , ; N89.27-OOE N`\ Y 1•~ `Wraba~' 107.00 m 10 ai1' 107.00 - 2900 .44 AC N89.27 OOE \Ir,SS~p7a1, y/ ROAD Q55 71414, , 1 }200 114~:0~1> g BS 40R /t 51~ '6M] y~1?00 • 1~ 2bfr'OAD' ' `8 try 5 << awo m p 5'r 48.24180 m\\ .47A- > ,mnmmo ' ~ 110.19 13,29 98.20 S2 3200 I m 9 i 1 ` 108.04 „ 42,38 0 86,6 3B` ? Rc a9 1n' S Y Y 1P '40; 67.72 VIE Y 1► T~ q RSA CE 74.84 ~ 85.10 ~38,~ R$ 126 4.07 4 99.47 6 21 20.i'6 3600 a 374 0 ~ 383 0 3900 ro 5 ~ 2 rJ r J r "I SITE ` 7; 93.38418 83515 Y 4o CIO SW CANTS n 7581848 10931582 6d 199.98 , . I 60.40 138.68 y rI'32 :00 D, I 1111 A A 2700 0 611 05 38 AC~,~4; 200 m ►I to m ..F W 1800 a > I ' s9s 33-0OW 284.00 - - I, m ; - - ri 214.00 I so.00 I WAD, 0860 R A Ol/N/(I•r~'0•M~" P,V-tU9VRVbYdV-IOIII-LAtlVM TAX MAP MITCH CHARTER SCHOOL CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON JULY 17, 2006 M 900 2W s m .60 AC 25' ' J I AN o3~tc• 209.02 m z U w 0 10 Q OJ i cv) 0 r e 4000 1 N J 599.2 S EXHIBIT 1 ~ i 1700 < 1600 1500 8 2 3 / / 14 ~ 7g,88 w\,N 88.80 111.00 ~ d SW VI TERRACE 9t~ ~ 7.89 f 111.00 4o. o B cb 'ry• 13( o 1 a 1100 5 e m a ~ 8 7 A !L02 1200 N1 %rTrJ r P J j\J 6ri J J r , ! 7 7Z 229.02 - - - 117.00 117.18 ~ - / 845 r-V 0 50 1 e 800 N 700 a 35 AC .35 AC r rl f~ 6 V 113.50 160.00 S89.51-OOE 3 2303 n 38 AC 2302 84 AC 13350 .R0Q)1 vH i 100 200 117.00 117.18 ° w aINEZ 1 104.99 ; 47000; a Q) 20 • m 104.99 4800 q 2 77 AC QQ\ t e W al 4300 21 ml :467 3 ri 81 AC I I Q J; :)c Design Group o Poaricompany • • • • , i' ? n4 s 41+ i1. • J , a r o A) ~ M I M M_ i ~ • 8.1w. VFW Mffl~ N ~Alrl r' n I~ t . ► + Flo )Plow ,i ~7 ~ `tom ~ F i....~~~:li~~a~ , = o' d o 0 0, r P ; - ~g• I 07/I+/ W - U33, - Blot - r.V- 32\d"NWV*\ -,mn-AZ .en AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH MITCH CHARTER SCHOOL CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON JULY 17, 2006 ~oQ~a 0 40 80 160 ~{{4 Design Group o FaraU mnipcrr; • EXHIBIT 2 UY V i • nn View of church from Canterbury Lane View of entrance to church/school site off 103rd r ..,.yam i f j View of sidewalk along Canterbury Lane, looking east • • View of entrance to the proposed school View of west parking lot from Canterbury Lane f i View of home across Canterbury Lane from church C I~ ~ ~ s 9 • • View of entrance to church View of sidewalk along Canterbury Lane, looking west View of playground next to proposed school • • • View of parking lot, looking northeast View of west parking lot, looking south 1 View of Canterbury Lane, looking east 0 i i View of fire lane behind church Existing bicycle rack • r- ,a View of solid waste disposal and recycling area av, View of semi-public space in front of church on Canterbury Lane View of 103rd, looking south View of Tigard Water District reservoir from church driveway • f along north property View of landscape strip line 0 storm water - • I~ • z L~ D 0 3 az ©e ~ I ~r I ~~Nj CU (l1' ~ 1 I f' T z n c 1 g,I~ ! i n rE ~ N ~S ( N 6 4'1 e - Ik I' i >C C ~ 0- ~ 0 _ Iz^ r? 0- rn X z C 7 s L rn m O I Id, C { T a i • .I tiff "V sF q ~ ' e If 1~111 III rl In all :,II ~ fi I j l " r, c .ia II ~ I ~ I J fi v ~f - L ~h r IL Ij LB B EE) ~B R-1 I f 97110 1016- (503) s~ n a i ; iial ~.i•..Ic Presbvtecian Church Robert Gray Pat E ' is l ~ c4- e N ~ S W Canterb~ Lan k10445 u Pa BOX :Tigard, OregOri 97224-4&1, 1 bHbR oa 8 ~ iIf ~ , .III ff lip i I M . ~I T 1~ ry I~ - I. i • • • 0 F • 6t • 1 If _ _ _ql x c~ - 0 _ I. z~ F Y Z Z NI Z ! r r r r i J~ 1 / f r J J r t vvl IX, b t; X s 0 7- P:resbvterian Church Lane 10445 &.,W.' Canterbury Tigard; Qregori 97224-4811 ' x I~ o. r o Z _ 1 10 6 ® oE -A z• ~ E 0 0 _ - 0 fly L~ 1 F \ r \ ~ r \ • r r , r \ r 1 ~r \ 1 J no. BOX 1616 , SHEBWOOO, OR 97106 • (609) 694-676 - r 0 0 0 • r .-t I ° e a Z x Z t~ Io I 1I, Il, 1 I ~ l I f , hI 1 t ; I I it . I ~ Ifl I y d I f I - Ji N x ~~ppu 0 Zl 1n, , f'll i fly. I y~ ~I I i t ~ ~ ~ r T,-)l i I I ~ I' II y ~I I III u i , I ~iI ~p I I ICI p~, I!~jl n . III' :III II IIII '~I~I 'I~ 11 ;I ....I I LL .I. ~ pz g~ z '13 1' g • •o 0 a z G d• - T - * A 0 Z c~ Q C/s2, w~.Y. • Presbvtenan Church . _ a1 0 ).0445 S V~':.Cariterbury...; Lane fiigdrd; Oregon 9722#. 481_1_' i = j= - / ~7- 0 m :I I d' Ilk I In ' - ~ j •s Robert Gray Partners Irtc. P.O. BOX 1016 SHUMOOO. OB'07110 • (50.1) 695.6676 • 40 - ~a • `LAS - p Ut ~ ~ ~ : , ~ ~ 'i Z -~'Z mo `may, . ~`,,!,,,,,gk ~A _ ` ~q \ ; -AN ~ .ttl ilk I¶ I~~~ ' .~S i[~~ ~ ,y 4. ~ P~ •r :Q~~.~ ip< ~4 (K1~Y h 8 m Y I / !IE t" jj, A,F CIA Orr. fc~ Ill LI ••~r ih I I,;,i;l~l .,Y, " /4l}1J, lip c c~ a Z ` r . i III "flr I~ 1+ y~ h:i~ Z n' 3p _ ni ~T all I'IIf' 'S! I; 't F I~ 11 IA N Ut ~U1 ~ ~b VI tll (D (A 'D d) < ::u N l I j 1 i:f,ll . I 4c ro a,~ ~ ``nni lD b I f , c. t9 , 0 1 t" 4~ pY~ § LK-A 30 p l 7 al 91 D TI tt-~~ L ° 1 @ I II1;~wy yT~,ri } L~~ t>,~c~ ",JS jl (I~ V ~ Z 2 7L ~ i¢~ I ~l~y' j ` I !FI I y 1 ~ ~ ~ U` L ~ ~ I irt, ~ I ~ P L LH 10 / 1` Lp kl P I j R.+ I co.'•'n'~ a U U ip - 'Vi'a 6~' 'l In k N c1 l{ .8 L l;, y,,..~~ l• J!; ~s A,yk y / F 71 91, t kh L L Z f sH $ (A ko -q To z Y (1 USN Iy 4 fP o U Z W. _ =c n s~ -14 D W I c.4 qty 99 , A01v • fJ r T _ (ra ceps, '"1 I M z I ' rn G L i j ,Q I--1 '-i I~ II Od 161~ z -I f~ / I 1 gg b E,, 1 I I I _ /~r'a q~ Z. Mou rim Y ~ x o. 0 man 0 -4 4) 0 L. .Ir. 295 i L ro. ~V. 1 0 3 R•" I, HD Gray Inc. _ Presbyterian Church Robert Partners iN` o E+ ; 10445 S.W. Canterbury Lane. is j r ( II Ea eox 1016 Tigard, Oregon 9°7224-4811 SNERWOOD,OR97140•..(609)691-4676 4' ~ I [ A ~ i - u _ t 6~ . ~1 I .0.24 I~ r. I ~ ~ cp r I gcu=yslPa~L ~°rCJ~ 4` °ll~l Cl D N 10 ~ i y.o ,•v. v'..c... c.. ro.awnaK 1 I 4;II S t1. 1 +4 .44 ;9 • 54 7l { lj~ ~zl I i vJ • ~ - 295 -1~ - 0 Robert Gray Partners Inc. Presbvterian Church oil; N . f 10445 S.W. Canterbury Lane. a N -1.1111 I Tigard, Oregon 97224-4811 "P.Q ox i rj h .:I,. I• - y q~ - SRERtVOOD;'OR 97140 el50]) 69Y•~673 • I K FT. L 0 ~ a 12' s, '721 c z: 1721' T it ~QTI --j I i v I I OQ 'z►~'Z r< C( -o m H _ Presbyterian Church r N a 10445 S.W. Canterbury Lane Tigard, Oregon 97224-4811 0 rn • e s r I r i n~ ~ T X Z i r Y f~ Robert Gray Partners Inc. P.O. BOX 1016 SRERO(OOD. OR 97140 • (509) 6924675 O~k » 0 M • • • a EX 0• PRESSURE W/k y fl I \ ~ EX 72' dtAN M/L' ~ . / ' ;to ~ ~>n I \ - - ~ i~ III 1 I I I / I I 1 1 ' I I I , I I ? ~ I Y 8 ~ : r/ I I ~I 1 ( I I 1 I III . ~ ~ \ ~ a~ 1 ~ III . . 'V.'1:`S'~''v_~~ti'r•..,...:•o:.:::~. x + I I ~ ~ ` \ I / / 1 I I I I tl__ell ~ • _ " JI II I off: C L~ :vi~" ' p y' ..Z Y pF i w--- ~ / I I \ W L L .J a--- x ~ I 0 a = 333. 0 0 Q~~yp / I• 0 0 4. 113 e.. ia8~ ~ ter. I 1 41 s I IIY7 t_ n I +e~ s. ts1l~ ~g IL a J~' ~ I' ~ ~ 1 I I I - I' \ ✓ i' - - - - - - - - - - - - \ - f_ _ r----- - SW 103RD EX SMM RNB ; 0..00 f+O AVE UE 2+00 y ` tr EX. 10' PRESSURE I + _ _ _ _ 5.00 Yi•_~ 7- . - - - - _ I _ er e• mn N _ ;1: N c o R fTl °I I e~ = e I N I 3d~ d ~C S -7 e , 1,18UL ENC;INEERING Storm Drain and CA L VlN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH s 376 PORT(:AND AVENUE g. _..:.N.. cu037dNe;. 0"6ba: e7027 S a'n i-t a r y- S e W e r- .P G a-n • .(503) 867=0188 ROBER T GRA Y PAR TNERS INC 0 0 0 a a r. I ~ L~_ Y 7-7 jj~~ ~ ~ j►{ Z y` I P S , - T € :y 17- D -P Z. ' ! i ~ ' ~~Tq I I Zal of 2o~ ou I u~ I 9-o i -47-.0n 2c~o" IQ, o° I u I.7-O ~ r H m , • vAl R Presbvterian Church obert • , H o r N '•.LY VAL ; n 1`0445 S.W. Canterbury Lane' TigardOregon 97224-481 1 SHERW000.EU.OR 9 977140710 - • E (SOJ) 69T-1676 C -s • July 20, 2006 Project; Ml71CH School Site, Tigard i Engineers a Porad company Ms. Kim McMillan City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Subject: Sight Distance at Proposed MITCH School along SW 103'd Avenue/SW Canterbury Lane I have conducted a study of available sight distance along SW 103rd Avenue and SW Canterbury Lane at the entrances to the existing church that will provide the site for the proposed MITCH School (one on SW 103rd and two on SW Canterbury). All three locations meet the Visual Clearance Area requirements in the Chapter 18.795 of the City's Development Code. Sight distance was also evaluated based on the City's Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Requirements. The TIS requirements call for minimum sight distance equal to 10 times the posted speed from driver's eye height of 3.5 feet to an object height of 4.25 feet, measured 15 feet back from the extended curb line or edge of pavement. (We also conducted measurements 10 feet back of the edge of pavement/extended curb line). The posted speed limit along SW 103rd Avenue Is 35 mph, requiring 350 feet of sight distance. No posted speed was seen on SW Canterbury Lane, but as a residential street it was assumed to be 25 mph, corresponding to a requirement for 250 feet of sight distance. Results of the sight distance measurements are as follows: • 1. Westemmost Canterbury Lane drivewav (staff oarkino entrance) Sight distance (SD) to the east exceeds 250 feet. Clear SD to the intersection with Murdock, approximately 500 feet, could be provided by trimming one bush on the school grounds (photo #1) SD to the west is limited to 190 feet. There is a bush at the base of a tree along the side of SW Canterbury Lane adjacent to the church. SD would be adequate if this bush is trimmed (photo #2). 2. Main Canterburv Lane drivewav: SD to the east is clear back to the intersection with SW 103rd Avenue (about 190 feet), where Canterbury ends (photo #3). SD to the west exceeds 250 feet, measured 10 feet back from the edge of curb (photo #4). (Unless noted, all measurements were taken 15 feet back from the edge of pavement/edge of curb) 3. 103rd Avenue drivewav: SD to the north is 245 feet measured from 15 feet back from the edge of pavement. However, it exceeds 250 feet measured from 12 feet or less (photos #5 and 6), which meets AASHTO standards 20085 NWTanasbourneDrive . Hillsboro, OR 97124 SD to the south is clear for 275 feet to the intersection with SW Canterbury P 503.690.8080 F 503.645.5930 Lane (photo #7). E hillsboro@ctsengineers.com www.ctsengineers.com Based on our evaluation, sight distance at the site access points on SW Canterbury Lane • and SW 103rd Avenue meets minimum sight distance requirements. Hillsboro, OR Tillamook, OR Vancouver, WA Bellevue, WA Coeur d'Alene, ID Sacramento, CA Clermont, FL www.paraticompany.com MITCH School Sight Distance July 20, 2006 If you have any questions or need to discuss this matter further, please contact me directly at (503) 690-8080 ext. 1365 or hroll(@ctsenaineers.com. • Sincerdly, Howard Roll, P.E. Senior Transportation Planner Attachments c: Debi Lorence, MITCH Charter School Ed Murphy, LDC Design Group p PRO F~SS GINE~c9 /O2 164PE 9< v~ GONJ,~ v y Y18 ,9 0 b HOWP, Q, (EXPIRATION DATE: VS 1-0 Page 2 0 • • • K~ #1: View EAST along Canterbury Lane from western site access (bush needs to be trimmed) 1• #2: View WEST along Canterbury Lane from western site access (bush needs to be trimmed) #3: View to EAST along Canterburn from main entrance (clear to intersection) Photos Taken by CTS Engineers, Page 1 STUDY AREA TYPICAL VIEWS MITCH School Access Points Tigard, Oregon • #4: View to WEST along Canterbury from main entry 250 ft 10' from edge of pavement) ~q 1 10 #5: View to NORTH along 103~d from 15 ft back (approx. 245 ft) #6: View to NORTH along 103`d from 10 ft back 250 ft clear) Photos Taken by CTS Engineers, Page 2 STUDY AREA TYPICAL VIEWS MITCH School Access Points Tigard, Oregon • 0 VIEWS STUDY AR.BA TY~~~~ po. is NIlTCI-i School A __-A OregOII 0 Photos Taken by CTS. Engineers, page 3 #7: VIeW tO w'' CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPL CAT ON CONFERENCE NOTES (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are VAid for Six (6) Months) ffW. MG DW Community (Development ShapingA Better Community NON-RES DENTIAL APPLICANT: iM ITCH C-L-i_k I AGENT: Ot 3 - bL 4 Lx)ck Phone: (5Q 67% - c. -[.47 COLS' - lZ..~ PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: S 6) C'oL2~'~u~ U h c° v TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: • PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: 1~1SLI l BLOa210c~ Y-~ ►Z~e~ 1C-8~ sc.~e~l r 3c .St tr ~ k d, h Se PA-" T~ z /p[yts~ V J ZONING MAP DESIGNATION:- - •S ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18. SIC)-A] MINIMUM LOT SIZE:000O sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: ft. Max. building height: ft. Setbacks Front,2p ft. Side S ft. Rear - I ft. Comer -,;2 ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: C`) % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: © NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting HandonO THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, INTERESTED PARTIES, AND THE CITY OF TIGAEM,PLANNING DWISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meetino is to be held prior to submitting vour application or the application will not be accepted. • NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON-Residential App4ca6on/Planning Division Section NI NARUTIVE [Refer to Code Chapter 18.3901 Li The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to • consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. Ly 1MPACT STUDY [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. - The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with'the dedication requirement, or provide evldence'which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. N//ACCESS . [Refer to Chapters 18305 and 183651 ~-7 Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: VWIMAY REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.705.0301 WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and • industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. ❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.730) ➢ STREETS: feet from the centerline of ➢ LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary.. ➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. ❑ SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS [Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.BJ BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: ➢ A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ➢ All actual building setbacks will be at least half of the building's height; and ➢ The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. BUFFERING AND SCREENING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7451 In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if . not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON-Residential Applicalion/Planning Division Section The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to vour proposal area are: • feet along north boundary. feet along south boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: feet along east boundary. feet along west boundary. LANDSCAPING [Refer to Code Chapters 18 745,18.765 and 183051 STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. [/RECYCLING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7551 Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. s ;S _,Ee VPARIaNG [Refer to Code Section 18.765.0401 REQUIRED parking for this type of use: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): 7,. SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: arking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): rail 3n Jea f 1 NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: ➢ All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. ➢ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and • in convenient locations. [ LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Secdon 18.765.0801 X -r 4rrj, c._~[P Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. -The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON-Residential AppGcation/Pianning Division Section VBICYCLERACKS [Refer to Codelction 18.7651 Se-e- '°t xt -t a W. 7 (D o • • • BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ❑ SENSITIVE LANDS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7151 The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR . FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to Dreciselv identfir sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meetina the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development aDDlication. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. STEEP SLOPES [Rder to Code Section 18.775.080.01 When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. CLEANWATER SERVICES 1CWSI BUFFER STANDARDS [Refer to R a 0 964WOSA Regulations.- Chapter 31 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated. corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION & ORDER 96-44 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION • Streams with intermittent flow draining: ► 10 to <50 acres 0 > 50 to < 100 acres • Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: 0 10 to <50 acres. it > 50 to < 100 acres SLOPE ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREA4 <25% <25% >25% WIDTH OF VEGETATED CORRIDOR PER SIDES 15 feet 25 feet 25 feet 50 feet 30 feet 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure in 25-foot increments from the starting point to the top of ravine (break in <25% slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine' "Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streamstrivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds, whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor, shall not serve as a starting point for measurement 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet, if a stamped geotechnical report confines slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes NON•Residenfid ApplicationlPlanning Division Section Page 4 of 8 Restrictions in the Veaetateforridor: • NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the • CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Veaetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated . corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. WS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a 'CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. SIGNS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7801 SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond. Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated • as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: k Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; 0 Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; k Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; 0 Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES :REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. [MITIGATION [Refer to Code Section 18390.06011 REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: • ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-Residential ApplicabordRanning Division Section ➢1 If a reDlacement treOf the size cut is not reasonably avai Rale on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: • 0 The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity.. IN-LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. TEAR VISION AREA [Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) The City requires that .CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. ❑ ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the-minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot-wide access easement. • • The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2'/z TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than % times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS 18.330 (Conditional use) 18.340 (Directs Interpretation) 18.350 (Planned Development) L / 18.360 (Ste Development Review) 18.370 (variancestAdtustments) _ 18.380 (Zoning MaprrextAmendments) 18.385 (vxcellaneous Permits) _Z1 8.390 (Decision Ma" PnxedunesAmpact Study) 18.410 (Lot Line Adjustments) _ 18.420 (Land Partitions) 18.430 (Subdivisions) 8.510 (Residential Zoning Districts) 18.520 (Commercial Zoning Districts) 18.530 (Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.620 (Tigard Triangle Design Standards) 8.630 (Washington Square Regional Center) 18.705 (AccesslEgnesstCirculation) 18.710 (Accessory Residential units) 18.715 (Density Computations) /.18.720 (Design Compatibility Standards) 18.725 (Environmental Performance Standards) 18.730 (Exceptions To Development standards) 18.740 (Historic overlay) 742 (Home Occupation Permits) 18.745 (Landscaping & Screening Standards) 18.750 (ManufacturedNobil Home Regulations) 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) 18.760 (Nonconforming Situations) ~G 18.765 (Off-street Parking/Loading Requirements) 18.775 (Sensitive Lands Review) ✓18.780 (Signs) 18.785 (Temporary use Pem>its) _18.790 (Tree Removal) 8.795 (visual Clearance Areas) /18.798 Wireless Communication FaalNes) -tL 18.810 (Street & Lihlity Improvement Standards) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Seclion Page 6 of 8 ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS- 0 ~,co w~.Qe'+est.t`a 3 10. v3 O a ,:l " 4 a-".-rs o L. L [o S,` .re ~oJ,o ►x~.~ Reu,'P.w * AZp-A.,-., q. 3 6o All A AX 4Lh'W< 11 L r I`Ns .l2$a S6 c rr"'-e Y~ ~ir~Il <l S ifs. r ate E'~ICc?-h•K,, ct P rr~pGz,--ol r2 rd'r; oc~ 40- O r J !je s u e.c-t- - S~.ve.~~.P c~~r-~• r a~' ~,~o,P • PROCEDURE t Administrative Staff Review. 'Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planninq Division. acceptance may be returned.. The Planninq counter closes at 5:00 PM. Maps submitted. with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8'/z" x 11". One. 8W, x 11" map of a proposed proiect shall be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Applications with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. • The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if.additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Residential Applicabon/Planning Division Section Tlie administrative decision public hearing will typically occur ap )ximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the F~lanning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public • hearing A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard Pu 1 A basic flowchart which illustrates the review process is avai a om the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTILA LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the Cs . olicy is to apply those svstem development credits to the first buildinq permit issued in the development UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE The conterence and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects relate site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY- CITY OF TIIWD PLAANVDIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: X03-63,1-4171 FAX: 503-684-7297 S cir;) -7 1Ar ` 21 _r I a- EMAIL : MJim j @d.tigard.orm TITLE 18 (CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE) INTERNET ADDRESS: www.cLt11gard.er.us • K: pattyhasters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 15-Dec-04 (Engineering section: preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON-Residential Applicabon/Planning Division Section i 0 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES • PUBLIC FACILITIES Clglofflgard,6regon Community Deve&pment Shrap *.X Scuff Glommmity Tax Map[s]: MUM, Tax Lofisl: 2800 Use Tme: CUP ) dent of necessarv_public improvements and dedications which shall be required 0 the applicant will bP recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority..) There will be no final recommendation to the cision making authority on behalf of the City staff untTall concerned commenting agencie%,I~y staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are kEo ectio - t public improvement related requirements that Imay-buyequired as a condition of development approv for your proposed project. Right-of-wav dedication: r The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. • Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ® SW 103`d Avenue to 27 feet from centerline ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet Street improvements: ® Half street improvements will be necessary along SW 103rd Avenue, to include: ® 16 feet of pavement from centerline ® concrete curb ® storm sewers and other underground utilities (Wet ~ S ® 5-foot concrete sidewalk with 5 foot planter strip ® street trees sized and spaced per TDC • ® street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applicatlon Conference Notes Engineering Department section ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q Page 1 of 6 ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: • ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. • ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities • ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Engineering Department Section Page 2 91 6 ❑ Other: • • Agreement for Future Street Improvements: • In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: ( 1 ~py~x6t (2•) Or o~ Overhead Utilitv Lines: ® Section 18.810.120 of the igard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a developmen to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW 103rd Avenue. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. -~.~,,v~ Giese +k,5 av~._ -orb-~.;, C, f • Sanitary Sewers: L-►^ c The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located in 103rd Avenue. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to connect to the public sewer. R VYa- d d ~ U Water Supply: The gly of Tiqard (Phone:(503) 639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: John Dalby, (503) 356-4723] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. lr • Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Appncadon Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section drainage plan for the site, arWay be required to prepare a sub-*in drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Detention is required if net, new impervious surface area exceeds 5000 square feet. • Al/A Storm Water Qualitv: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on- site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ® Construction of an on-site water quality facility. 0A y(o G (C, ❑ Payment of the fee in-lieu. ,lilt-Y-- Water quality treatment is: required if you disturb the site (development). This does not include interior remodel work. • Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. 1V TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact /Fe TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based e development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the roposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size'of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at. the time of buildinq permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible onl t when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. C. 1w- ClG k / s y c~ee, 7 Pay the TIF. CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Engineering Department Section f\)D V71" l ' .55w ~ CY- r, Page 4 of 6 PERMITS' Public Facilitv Improvement (PFI) Permit: • Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. NOTE: Engineering Staff time will also be tracked for any final design-related assistance provided to a Permittee or their engineer prior to submittal of a PFI permit application. This time will be considered part of the administration of the eventual PFI permit. The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows: NOTE: If an PH Permit is required, the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. 0 Buildina Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. . Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. CITY OF TICARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section 28 P'LAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED 6Y: vrY%.,r r r 8 wt4j%.. _ ENGINEERINsoEPATMENT STAFF Phone: [50316394111. Fax: 15031624-0152 cument2 September 2, 2003 CITY OF TURD Pre-Application Conference Notes Engineering Department SectIoD 4<1 7•S-0I= DATE Page 6 of 6 • • 0 • • • MINUTES MITCH Charter School Major Modification to a Conditional Use Permit Neighborhood Meeting July 27, 2006 The meeting started at 7:00 P.M. at the Calvin Presbyterian Church. The meeting was called to order by Lee Weislogel, chairman of the MITCH Charter School Board of Directors. Mr. Lee welcomed everyone and explained the purpose of the meeting. He then introduced Debi Lorence, principal for MITCH Charter School, and Ed Murphy, a land use planning consultant with LDC Design Group. Ms. Lorence presented a summary of the proposed school, including the relationship between the charter school and the Tigard- Tualatin School District (TTSD). She said there would be about 20 students per room, that they have eight classrooms. Mr. Murphy presented a summary of the application review process. Approximately 10 people attended, including neighbors and church members. A sign-in sheet is attached. Summary of issues discussed: • Number of students, teachers and staff. Debi said they expected about 160 students, plus 8 teachers and 3 support staff. ■ Where the students come from. Debi explained there are no restrictions on where the students are from, and that about 40% of the students are from outside the TTSD boundaries. ■ Traffic impacts. Debi explained that most children arrive at 7:45 AM and leave at 3:30 PM, Monday through Thursday, and that many of the children arrive in car-pools. Ed Murphy said he would check into establishing school speed zones. ■ Curriculum. Debi explained the school's emphasis on agriculture, arts, music and PE. Discussion of how the curriculum might be different from a regular public school or a private school. ■ Recess. There was some discussion about use of the gymnasium and the small outdoor playground. • Special needs children. Debi explained how TTSD provides assistance with special needs students. • Use of the interior space. There was some discussion about storage and shared use of the facilities between MITCH and Church Sunday School. • Liability. Debi assured attendees that MITCH carries liability insurance. No one brought up any issues related to site improvements, or mentioned any off-site impacts. The meeting was adjourned at approximately 8:15 P.M. • 0 • SIGN-EF SHEE~ MITCH Charter School Conditional Use Permit Neighborhood Meeting Ju1v 27, 2006 NAME -IJ J, . ~ ~cQ MA ML4 ADDRESS ( z.7Y-0 S~ l 11 TIC . 77 ~ ~r2 ~ ~ 7 ZL 3 z 17S c5W BlC" fzzt e, 10 9~9-4 ~c 75 5W (Vtu4uck S~. I?ZZy ~ujy N1~ II~~ J ~ • I sy 2m, 50) p ,L 0I n S 0 ~ S~ W~. c~li 4e.r Ip C~'~ PHONE 7 7 CSR ~3~ l 6 12-0s 21 ~2110 f36ZV 97zz-y `17 ZZ Y- yjk I~i4 not re6eue, ru,cd,:4 ~tafi c e 2S110AD-00510 BACKHAUS BRENDA 10627 SW CANTERBURY LN •TIGARD, OR 97224 2 10AD-00500 BAC U. ENDA 106 NTERBURY LN ARD, OR 24 2S1116C-03600 BATES STEPHEN CHRISTOPHER AND JODETTE SUGDEN 10430 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD, OR 97224 2S1116C-01000 BAUMAN C WAYNE & MARY 10270 SW VIEW TER TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110AD-04204 BEHRENDT ROBERT F AND SHARON A 1450 S KIHEI RD C205 KIHEI, HI 96753 • 110AD-04250 B EN OBERT F AND SHARON A 145 EI RD C205 EI, HI 9 53 2S110AD-02300 BENZ FRED S PO BOX 230029 TIGARD, OR 97281 IQ,110AD-02310, BE S PO 2 9 ARD, OR 97281 2S1 11 BC-03800 BERTULEIT MIRIAM R/DANIEL TRS 10390 SW VIEW TERRACE ST TIGARD, OR 97224 • 2S1 11 SC-02900 BOEHR IRWIN I AND PATRICIA L TRUSTEES 10470 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD, OR 97224 c~.~-- r -1/ r.>- I o 7 2S111BC-00200 BOGERT MARK H AND MARY E 14445 SW 100TH TIGARD, OR 97223 2S110AD-01800 BROWN SCOTT C 14630 SW 106TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97224 2S1116C-01400 BUEHLER GREGORY J & SARA L 10145 SW VIEW TER TIGARD, OR 97224 2S11OAD-04240 BUKRES MIWAKO 14615 SW 106TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97224 2 10AD-04203 BU S AO 146 106TH AVE GARD, O 97224 2S110AD-02810 CAGLE THOMAS E PO BOX 26 TUALATIN, OR 97062 2S110AD-02800 C TH AS E PO B ALATIN, O 97062 2S1IOAD-09400 CALWAY HILL HOMEOWNERS ASSOC BY STAN ADKINS BUILDER INC 8459 SW BARBUR BLVD PORTLAND, OR 97223 2314 OAD-09600 CALW ILL HO WNERS ASSOC BY STAN A BUILDER INC 8459 ARB BLVD P TLAND, OR 97 23 2 11 OAD-09500 CAL Y HILL H EOWNERS ASSOC BY STA S BUILDER INC 8459 BA UR BLVD RTLAND, OR 97223 • 2 110AD-01200 2S110AD-00300 CA AY HILL HO EOWNERS ASSOC DIXON CANDICE M BY ST A BUILDERINC 10631 SW CANTERBURY LN K 8459 R BLVD TIGARD, OR 97224 T97223 2S110AA-01500 2 10AD-00310 CANTERBURY PLACE LLC DIX C CE M 109 E 13TH ST 1063 ANTERBURY LN VANCOUVER, WA 98660 ARD, OR 7224 2S111 BC-04800 2S710AD-02100 COOPER THEODORE P & DREYER JOAN C SHELLEY R 14678 SW 106TH AVE 10198 SW INEZ ST TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S111 BC-02503 2 10AD-02110 CORLISS JAMES UCORA K DRE J C 9750 SW INEZ 1467 6TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97224 -ARD, OR 7224 2S110AD-02000 2S1 11 BC-03001 CRIST DAVID L & BARBARA A DUNKLEE JOHN & MARGARET 14672 SW 106TH AVE 10440 SW VIEW TERR TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97224 • 2 11OAD-02010 2S111BB-02400 CR DAVID & BARBARA A DURFEE DAVID A & SHIRLY M 14672 6TH AVE 10460 SW AMANDA CT RD, OR 7223 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S1 11 BC-02401 2S111BB-01200 CROSS ROGER K III & CLARE E FABER ROBERT C & MARGARET A 10155 SW MURDOCK ST 14230 SW 103RD TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110AD-00200 2S1 11 BC-03700 DANCESCU CHRISTIAN FAIRLEY RONALD S & KAREN S 10633 SW CANTERBURY LN 10420 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 Z11 10AD-00210 2S111BC-02300 DA SCU RISTIAN FANTZ GARY E AND GAY 1063 ANTERBURY LN 14530 SW 103RD AVE T RD, OR 24 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S111BC-03500 2S110AD-08600 DAVIS EDWARD & SUSAN LYNN FISHER ELEANOR 10445 SW VIEW TER 10505 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 FRISWOLD JAMES E & DIANA J HEYWORTH SEAN A & MEGAN E 14700 SW 103RD AVE 6333 SW GARDEN HOME RD TIGARD, OR 97224 PORTLAND, OR 97219 • 2S111BC-02500 2S110AD-00910 GALICH PATRICIA & HOYT JOYCE MITCHELL MICHAEL W 10619 SW CANTERBURY LN 10205 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S111BC-02504 2S11oAD-00900 GA H PATRIC & YT JOY MITCH HAEL W 106 CANTERBURY LN 10205 DOCK ST AR R 97224 TI RD, OR 9 24 2S110AD-04100 2S110AD-04000 GALYEN SUSAN E HRICSINA-DOWNEY KATHERINE A 14641 SW 106TH AVE 14647 SW 106TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S111BC-03400 2S110AD-00810 GOSSELIN WILLIAM C AND JJ RENTALS LLC BETTY JEAN 14803 SW 106TH AVE 10405 SW VIEW TERR. TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97223 • 2S111BC-04600 110AD 00800 GOTTER SAMUEL A & VICTORIA L EARD NTA LC 10125 SW MURDOCK ST 106TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97224 , O 7224 2S110AD-01900 2S1 11 BC-03300 HAASE JOHN G JOHNSON DOUGLAS EDWARD AND 14666 SW 106TH AVE SUE ANN TIGARD, OR 97224 10375 SW VIEW TERRACE TIGARD, OR 97223 2S110AD-01910' 2S111BB-00900 H E G KASTEL CHARLES G& MARY J TRS 146 H AVE < 14259 SW 100TH T - ARD 07224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110AD-01500 2S111313-01100 HADLEY MICHAEL F KA L C WALES G & MARY J TRS 10540 SW CANTERBURY LN 1425 00TH TIGARD, OR 97224 ARD, O 7224 2S111BB-01800 2S1 1 OAD-01700 HEISE MONICA JO-ANN KLABO LISA M 10390 SW AMANDA CT 14620 SW 106TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 0 2S1 11 BB-02200 2S110AD-01600 KLETZEL E SCOT & KRISTI S MCGUIRE STEPHEN 10479 SW AMANDA CT 10550 SW CANTERBURY LN . TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 25111 BC-00800 2S110AD-03200 KNIGHT W A MCNALLY BELINDA C 10175 SW INEZ ST 10627 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S111BC-02100 2S111BC-04000 ' LITTLETON DAVID A AND WANDA J MILLER JUDITH A & PAUL E TRS 10090 SW INEZ 10330 SW VIEW TER TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S111BC-03200 2S111BC-02700 LUKE-DORF INC MILLER PAUL E & JUDITH A 10313 SW 69TH AVE 10380 SW CANTERBURY TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110AD-02710 2S111BB-02500 LYNCH DORIS M MONTES GLORIA I & CARLOS A 10579 SW MURDOCK ST 10440 SW AMANDA CT TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97223 • 2S 10AD-02700 2S1116C-01500 LY DO M MUDROW MICHAEL T & DIANE C 10579 MURDOCK ST 10185 SW VIEW TERR T RD, 0 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110AD-03100 2S110AD-02410 MARSH BONNIE S NEVAN NICOL 10621 SW MURDOCK ST 10561 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S111 BC-00700 2 10AD-02400 MCBRIDE GLEN W & NE NI L JANET HALL 1056 MURDOCK ST 10135 SW INEZ T ARD, 0 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110AD-00700 2S1116C-02302 MCELHANEY JONATHAN D NOKES DESTON S 10623 SW CANTERBURY LN 15532 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD, OR 97224 STE C-113 #22 TIGARD, OR 97224 110AD-00710 2S1 11 BC-02303 M HAN 'JONATHAN D NOKES KATHY EVELYN 10623 CANTERBURY LN PO BOX 230231 TJ8 RD, 97224 TIGARD, OR 97281 2S110AD-04230 2S110AD-02510 • O'HAGAN JEANNINE REDELL JULIE L 14625 SW 106TH AVE 10567 SW MURDOCK ST .TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 110AD-0420 2 10AD-02500 O' A NNINE RE J L 1462 106TH AVE 10567 URDOCK ST ARD, 0 97224 T RD, OR 7224 2S110AD-03300 2S111BB-01000 OTTERSON JACK W & ESTHER M REEDER MARY R 38177 S DESERT STAR DR 14300 SW 103RD AVE TUCSON, AZ 85739 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S111BC-00600 2S11166-02600 PARTINGTON BRIGITTE ROCHE RICHARD L & KELLY J LIVING TRUST 10420 SW AMANDA CT BY B PARTINGTON TRUSTEE TIGARD, OR 97224 10085 SW INEZ ST TIGARD, OR 97224 25111 BC-01100 2S111 BC-01200 PHILLIPS LOIS JEAN SEARS ALLEN C 20290 SW COMANCHE TER c/o WILLIAMS GRANT & LANA TUALATIN, OR 97062 10190 SW VIEW TER TIGARD, OR 97224 • 2S110AD-01000 2S110AD-01100 POWELL JACQUELINE S SHIBLEY KENT D & RUTH K P O BOX 23322 10615 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD, OR 97281 TIGARD, OR 97224 110AD-0101 2 10AD-01110 PO KLL CQUELI NE S I Y T D& RUTH K P 0 22 1061 ANTERBURY LN T , 97281 ARD, OR 7224 2S1 11 BC-02800 2S111613-02300 PRESBYTERY OF PORTLAND THE SPRAGUE DEREK G & KORINDA E CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 10480 SW AMANDA CT 10445 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S1 11 BC-00900 2S111BC-01700 PRESBYTERY OF THE CASCADES STACK RICHARD W JUDITH C BY CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 10265 SW VIEW TERR 10445 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 • 2S111SC-03900 2S1 1 OAD-02600 RAUDY BEVERLY STANLEY CHERIE 10360 SW VIEW TERRACE 10573 SW MURDOCK TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 110AD-02610 2S110AD-04220 ST E HERIE TUCKER NOEL EDWARD 1057 MURDOCK 14635 SW 106TH AVE T ARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110AD-00110 110AD-0420 STRATTON CHARLA MARIE E EL EDWARD 10635 SW CANTERBURY LN 146 PAN 106TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97224 T4GARD, 97224 2S110AD-00100 2S110AD-02210 ST 0 RLA MARIE UHLER ANN S & 1063 ANTERBURY LN COATES LAURA C ARD, OR 7,224 14684 SW 106TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110AD-03700 11 OAD-02200 STRICKLER JAMES P & U F I L" 1, ANN 1, 9 TINA R COATE RA C 14677 SW 106TH AVE W TH AVE i~ TIGARD, OR 97223 , OR97224 ARD 2S110AD-03600 2S111 BC-01300 TAYLOR CHARLES C II & AVA C UM EUNKYU C & KWANG Y 14685 SW 106TH AVE 10150 SW VIEW TER TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 • 2S110AD-08801 0AD-08690 TIGARD COLONY LIMITED PARTNERSHI UNK OWNER 380 UNION ST STE 300 WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA 1089 2 110AD-08700 2S110AD-03900 TI D C Y LIMITED PARTNERSHI WEBBER MICHAEL D 380 U ST STE 300 9612 171ST AVE SE T SPRI IELD, MA 1089 SNOHOMISH, WA 98290 2S110AD-08701 2S110AD-03800 Y LIMITED PART NERSHI WENSTRAND ROBERT G X TE 300 14661 SW 106TH AVE SPRI IELD, MA 1089 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S1 11 BC-02600 2S111BC-04400 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT WILDER RANDY A & JANETTE L 8777 SW BURNHAM ST COCHRAN BOYD C & WANDA J PO BOX 23000 WESTENHAVER DANA L & MARY LYN T TIGARD, OR 97223 14563 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97224 2S1 11 BC-031 00 2S111BC-04300 TIMMINS KELLY A & KATHLEEN M WILDER RANDY A/JANETTE L 14335 SW 103RD AVE 14541 SW 100TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110AD-00400 • WI-LEMS ATHENA 10629 SW CENTERBURY LN •TIGARD, OR 97224 2S1 D-00410 WILLE AT 10629 TERBURY LN T RD, OR 97 4 2S110AD-00610 WILLIAMS TERRY T 10625 SW CANTERBURY LN TIGARD, OR 97224 T T >1062 0600 NTERBURY LN OR 9 24 25711 BC-01600 YOUR ESTATE PO BOX 738 VANCOUVER, WA 98666 • 0 0 • Josh Thomas 10395 SW Bonanza *Tigard,OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335 SW.Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esau PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 is Tigard, OR 97224 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Joseph Dyar 10285 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224-4668 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn Tigard, OR 97223 • John Frewin 9 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 1361,11 Place Tigard, OR 97224 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH INTERESTED PARTIES Am I of 11 (iAcurDln\setuD\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: 12-Mav-05 • 0 ~11~~ • • • * I * LJF * Irm DISPOSAL COMPANY P.O. Box 820 Sherwood, OR 97140 Phone: (503) 625-6177 Fax: (503) 625-6179 July 20, 2006 LDC Design Group Attention: Ed Murphy 20085 NW Tanasbourne Dr. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Re: Calvin Presbyterian Church, 10445 SW Canterbury Ln., Tigard, OR 97224 Pride Disposal currently provides both trash and recycling commercial service at this location. We have front-load trucks that empty the trash and co-mingle recycling and a residential truck that collects the glass totes for recycling. • At this time we don't foresee a change in accessibility for service with the addition of the Mitch Charter School moving on-site. However, there may be a need for increased service, which can be evaluated at any time. Please let us know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Linda Lopeman Pride Disposal Company (503) 625-6177 ext 133 lindal ..gridedisr)osal.com 0 Jul-26. 2016 3:26PM CLEAN WATER SERVICES 503 6814439 y JUL 2.0 26OG • By C lean%ter~ Services Out commitment is clear. • N o . 3 8 2 2 P. 1 File Number 0 0 23 Sq Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment Jurisdiction Tigard. Date July 18. 200.6 _ Map & Tax Lot 2S1 11BC 2800 Owner Calvin P shvlcri n C :hllrt-h Applicant D-DDIC.004crs Site Address 10445 SW Canterburv Lane Company LDC Desien Grout/. Tigard. OR_9.. 224 Address 20085 NW Tanasbourne Proposed Activity modification to existing City State Zip I IIIIshoro, 0R 971.24 Condidundd Use Permit Phone 503.858.4242 Fax 503.645.5500 By submitting this form the Owner, or Owner's authorized agent or representative, acknowledges and agrees that employees of Clean Water Services #iave authority to entor the project site at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting project site conditions and gathering information related to the project site. Official use only below this line oliiciii Lisa only imow tws Ilne orflelal use only below ims line Y N NA Y N NA ❑ 11051 ❑ Sensitive Area Composite Map Stormwater Infrastructure maps Map# XV-4A41 ❑ ❑ X QS# Lr5r? Locally adopted studies or maps Other ❑ ❑ ® Specify ❑ LJ K Specify Based on a review of the above Information and the requirements of Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Resolution and Order No. 04-9: Sonsitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200' of the site, THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties, a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. ❑ Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on sitelor within 200' of the site. This pre-scrccning site assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect wator quality sensitive aroas if they are subsequently discovered. This document will serve as your Service Provider lotter as roquired by Resolution and Order 04-9, Section 3.02.1. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicablo local, state, and federal law. The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development. NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED, Reviewer Comments: Reviewed By: • Post-it'" Fax Note 7671 T~e e Q" 'heS coMep I. Phone # Fax If L • IC f/ ~~/L~3 ~Dale A6 Q(9 PBBes~ From uGA "Awv ~Phone #~03 Fax # Date: ._?12 Kor.7Ow Official use only Returned to Applicant Mail Tux P( Counter Date z 1.r ny QC_S C 1 August 2, 2006 Project No. OR06.06ZT01 Tigard MZTCH School 1 Engineers a Parati company Ms Kim McMillan City of Tigard (~,11 /f ~t~ 13125 SW Hall Boulevard u u l(~ ~ L~\`~ D ' Tigard, OR 97223 AUG 0 8 2006 SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis for the Proposed Tigard MZTCH School to be located on the northwest corner of SW 103;'d Avenue/SW Canterbury Lane intersection in Tigard, Oregon CITY OF TiCA~D PLANNING/ENGINEERING Dear Ms McMillan: Based on your request, CTS Engineers has performed an analysis of the traffic impacts of the proposed relocation of the existing Tigard MITCH K-8 Charter School from its former location at Tigard High School to a new location within the Calvin Presbyterian Church, at the corner of SW 103rd Avenue/SW Canterbury Lane in Tigard (see Figure 1). The Comprehensive Plan designation for the Calvin Church is LOW 3.5 (Low- density residential). Religious institutions and schools are permitted in this district. The MITCH School is a K-8 charter school with classes Monday through Thursday from 8:00 AM to 3:30 PM. Other than being closed every Friday, it will operate on the same schedule as the Tigard School District, with no school during holidays or other breaks in the school year. The MITCH School has no regular weeknight or weekend activities. The MITCH School charter allows a maximum of 198 students. For the first two years, it is planned to operate without 7th and 8th grade classes, with a proportionate reduction in enrollment. However, to ensure a conservative analysis of potential traffic impacts, the analysis assumes the maximum enrollment of 198 students. (For comparison, there were 170 students enrolled at the MITCH School's existing Tigard High location during the 2005-2006 school year). Based on the results of this analysis, it is concluded that the proposed Tigard MITCH School can occupy space within the Calvin Presbyterian Church without adversely affecting the traffic operational or safety characteristics of the adjacent street system. Specific findings of this study are as follows: • Study area roadways and intersections cant' relatively low traffic volumes during the peak hours of school traffic. Both intersections analyzed in detail operate at level of service A or B during these peak hours, with little delay. • Based on a telephone conversation with Calvin Presbyterian Church staff, the 1 church has no weekday activities and limited weeknight activities, with the only regularly scheduled event held every Wednesday evening. Thus, the school and church schedules are complementary uses with peak trip generation periods that do not overlap. • The site has approximately 177 on-site parking spaces, including 29 spaces on the west side in a parking area primarily used by staff. The two parking areas ' are connected via an internal parking access loop. No additional parking or expansion of the existing church area is proposed. Parking lot access is provided via three existing driveways, two on SW Canterbury Lane and one on SW 103rd Avenue. The main driveway on SW Canterbury Lane is about 180 ' feet west of SW 103rd Avenue/SW Canterbury Lane intersection, and the main 20085 NWTanasbourne Drive driveway on SW 103rd Avenue is about 285 feet north of the intersection. Hillsboro, OR 97124 There are no other driveways or connections between the intersection and the P 503.690.8080 main parking lot accesses. The existing parking area and Internal F 503.645.5930 ' circulation/storage will easily accommodate peak the MITCH School's peak E hillsboro@ctsengineers.com traffic and parking demand. www.ctsengineers.com Hillsboro, R 1 Tillamook, , OR Vancouver, WA Bellevue, WA Coeur d'Alene, ID Sacramento, CA ' Clermont, FL www.paraticompany.com 1 • • ' Tigard MITCH School Page 2 August 2, 2006 • The majority of vehicle traffic generated by the Tigard MITCH School will be during the school's morning and mid-afternoon peak hours, when school is starting or ending. The morning peak hour coincides generally with the morning peak commute hour, and thus represents the worst-case scenario for potential traffic impacts. The afternoon peak hour would be approximately 3:00 to 4:00 PM, which is earlier than the evening commute peak ' hour (the school lets out at 3:30 PM). • Analysis of future 2008 background traffic volumes that will exist regardless of the buildout of the proposed Tigard MITCH School found that the study area intersections are expected to perform similar to existing conditions. • The school is expected to generate approximately 174 vehicle trips during the AM peak hour ' and 129 trips during the mid-afternoon peak hour of the school. Based on the MITCH school's daily operating and event schedules, a negligible number of PM peak hour vehicle trips are expected. However, to ensure a conservative evaluation of potential impacts, a PM peak hour analysis was conducted using typical private school evening peak hour trip generation rates. ' The morning peak hour, when maximum school traffic coincides with commuter traffic, represents the "worst case" for the proposed school's trip generation. • Analysis of total future 2008 traffic conditions with buildout of the proposed Tigard MITCH ' School would slightly increase traffic along SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103rd Avenue, particularly in the morning peak hour. However, the study area intersections will continue to operate at Level of Service (LOS) B or better during weekday peak hour periods. ' Based on expected arrival patterns, moderate delay could occur at the two primary site entrances during the morning and mid-afternoon peak periods due to an increased number of turns at the site access points. However, the site and its internal parking area and circulation aisles are large enough that any queuing created by student pickup/dropoff activity is ' expected to be accommodated entirely within the site. • No off-site improvements are necessary to accommodate traffic generated by the proposed Tigard MITCH School or mitigate its impact. However, the City should post or have the ' applicant post the new School Zone signs along the SW 103rd Avenue frontage. (It is not necessary along SW Canterbury Lane, which has speed humps and is posted at 25 mph.) The following sections document the study's methodology, results, and major findings. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ' Figure I shows the general vicinity of the site. Figure 1A is an aerial photo showing the existing Calvin Presbyterian Church building that will house the MITCH Charter School. The applicant is proposing to relocate the Tigard MITCH School from its current site at Tigard High School to space within the existing church. The Comprehensive Plan designation for the Tigard MITCH School is LOW 1 3.5 (Low-density residential), which allows both church and school uses. The school is a charter school serving K-8 (K-5 planned initially for two years), Monday through Thursday from 8:00 AM to 3:30 PM. Its charter allows a maximum enrollment of 198 students. The main parking area with approximately 147 parking spaces is located on the east side of the building. There is a smaller 30-space lot located ' on the west side that is typically used by staff. Parking access is provided via an existing driveway along the west side of SW 103rd Avenue and two existing driveways along the north side of SW Canterbury Lane. ' STUDY AREA Analysis has been conducted of surrounding roadways and driveways in the immediate vicinity of the site. Based on scoping discussions with City staff, this traffic analysis focuses on the three site access driveways and the adjacent intersections of SW Canterbury Lane/SW 103rd Avenue and SW Inez Street/SW 103rd Avenue. ' Tigard MITCH School Page 3 August 2, 2006 AREA CONDITIONS Study Area Land Uses Land uses in the immediate vicinity of the site consist of single-family homes to the north, east, and west. A municipal water facility is located south of the site on the opposite side of SW Canterbury Lane. Higher density housing is located further west toward Hwy 99W. ' Site Accessibility Area Roadway System Figure 2 shows the approximate location of the proposed Tigard MITCH School and the surrounding roadway network. The two roadways that provide direct access to the site are SW 103rd Avenue and SW Canterbury Lane. Table 1 presents the characteristics of these roadways, including the functional classification proposed in the City TSP. Existing and future traffic analyses in this study were conducted assuming existing roadway characteristics. Table 1: Summary of Study Area Roadway Characteristics Name Road Width Posted Bike Ste- Street t Class (Feet) Speed Sidewalks Lane (mph) Parking SW 103rd Avenue Local 38 35 Yes No Yes (north of SW Canterbury Ln.) (west side) ' SW Canterbury Lane Neighborhood 31 25 Yes No Yes (at SW 103rd Avenue) Route (both sides) Pedestrian and Bicycling Considerations In the immediate vicinity of the site, SW Canterbury Lane has a 6-foot sidewalk along the north side adjacent to the site, and a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side. SW 103rd Avenue has a 5-foot sidewalk adjacent to the site on the west side, and no sidewalk on the east side. The nearest bike lanes are about 1/4 mile west of the site on Hwy 99W and 1/4 mile north of the site on McDonald Street. Transit Considerations The proposed development will be a K-8 charter school (K-5 initially for two years). The MITCH school draws its student body from throughout the City. It will not provide bus transportation. Tri-Met Route 12-Barbur Blvd. and Route 95-Tigard/I-5 Express both stop at the intersection of Hwy 99W/SW Canterbury Lane, slightly more than 1/4 mile from the site. Route 12 is a high-frequency route with service every 15 minutes or less, every day of the year. Route 95 stops every 20-30 minutes during the morning 6:00 AM to 8:00 AM commute period (northbound only) and during the afternoon peak from 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM (southbound only). Both routes run between Sherwood and the Portland City center via us mall in downtown Portland, as shown below. Portland Clty Centar Burbvr Stud Tigard Barbur Sherwood KDHTN l Loyd 01strkt s»+ Porttand C Pty center Rose 1.5 0A_ Tigard e Shnnswod 0 ' Tigard MITCH School Page 4 August 2, 2006 Existing Traffic Volumes and Peak Hour Operations ' Traffic Volumes A reconnaissance of the site and its vicinity was conducted. Traffic volumes within the study area were obtained from weekday peak hour traffic counts conducted at the key study area intersections in late July 2006. The afternoon peak hour count was extended from 2:00 to 6:00 PM to capture the MITCH ' School's afternoon peak trip generation period. Figure 3 shows these recent counts. Traffic volumes greater than 25 were rounded upward to the nearest five vehicles. These data revealed that the morning peak hour typically occurs between 7:15 - 8:15 AM and the afternoon peak hour occurs between 4:45 - 5:45 PM. The site driveways were also counted during these periods; as shown in Figure 3 there was negligible driveway traffic. To assess the impact of the proposed Tigard MITCH School relocation, traffic operations were analyzed during the weekday morning/evening peak hours as well as the mid-afternoon (3:00 - 4:00 PM) school peak hour. These periods represent reasonable "worst case" traffic conditions within the study area and include the periods that the proposed development would generate most of its daily traffic. Peak Hour Traffic Operations Traffic conditions at key intersections in the study area were analyzed during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Intersection operational analyses were conducted using the procedures for evaluating unsignalized intersections in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), which describes the traffic ' operations of an intersection in terms of its Level of Service (LOS) and volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio. For unsignalized intersections, the intersection's LOS is stated relative to the most critical intersection approach or maneuver, typically the left turn from the minor street approach. The LOS criterion is stated as a letter grade, ranging from "A," indicating little or no delay, to "F," indicating that drivers ' experience long delays. The LOS worksheets for results presented in this study are attached as an Appendix to this report. Based on the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan (TSP), the City requires intersections to operate at LOS E or better, with a volume-to-capacity ratio less than 1.00. Table 2 presents LOS results for the key study area intersection based on the weekday peak hour traffic volumes shown in Figure 3. The results indicate that all study area intersections were estimated to operate at LOS B or better during the morning and evening commute peak as well as the 3:00 - 4:00 mid-afternoon hour representing the peak hour of school activity in the afternoon. These results are consistent with our observations of traffic operations made during the peak hour counts. Table 2: 2006 Existing Weekday Levels of Service Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Avg Avg Unsignalized Vehicle Vehicle Delay V/C Delay V/C (Sec/VehL Ratio LOS (Sec/Veh) Ratio Canterbury Ln/103rd Ave 9 6 0.17 A 10.5 0.11 Critical Leg: EB Approach . Canterbury Ln/ Inez St 9 7 0.01 A 9.2 0.01 Critical Leg: WB Approach . Mid-PM Peak Hour Avg Vehicle Delay V/C LOS (Sec/VehL Ratio LOS B 9.3 0.09 A A 9.5 0.02 A Traffic Safety Crash records for the most recent five years of available data (January 2001 - December 2005) were obtained from the City and examined for existing traffic safety problems at the intersections in the vicinity of the site. Figure 4 shows a summary of these data. This research found that there were two non-injury crashes reported in the study area at the intersection of SW Canterbury Lane/SW 103rd Avenue, which equates to an average annual crash rate of about 0.38 per million entering vehicles. No crashes were reported at the intersection of SW 103rd Avenue/SW Inez Street. The number and rate of reported crashes is typical of the collision experience for similar roadways throughout Washington County. 0 • ' Tigard MITCH School Page 5 August 2, 2006 Intersection Sight Distance ' A preliminary assessment of intersection sight distance was conducted at the site entrances on SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103rd Avenue. Photos in the Appendix document available sight distance at these intersections, which has also been documented in a separate letter submitted to the City's Development Review Engineer. SW Canterbury Lane and SW 103rd Avenue are relatively flat and ' straight in all directions in the immediate vicinity of the site. Adequate sight distance (10 times the posted speed) is either available or can be provided by trimming existing landscaping, as described below. • At the western (secondary) SW Canterbury Lane driveway, sight distance was found to be 250 feet to the east. Sight distance can be increased to approximately 500 feet (to SW 103rd Avenue) by trimming one bush on the school grounds. Sight distance to the west is limited to about 190 feet by a bush at the base of a tree on the property immediately west of the church. Adequate sight distance can be provided by trimming this bush. • At the main SW Canterbury Lane entrance, sight distance to the east is clear to the end of the street at SW 103rd Avenue (also about 190 feet). Sight distance to the west is 250 feet if measured 10 feet back from the edge of pavement. (Unless noted, sight distance was measured 15 feet back from the edge of pavement, which equates to the vehicle stopping behind the sidewalk.) • At the SW 103rd Avenue driveway, sight distance to the north exceeds 360 feet. Sight distance to the south is limited to 275 feet, to the intersection with SW Canterbury Lane. However, sight distance of 350 feet can be provided by trimming the lower branches of the second and third street trees south of the driveway. Based on this information, there do not appear to be any traffic safety concerns in the immediate vicinity of the site that the applicant needs to address, except for routine landscaping maintenance. 1 • • Tigard MITCH School Page 6 August 2, 2006 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS The impact of traffic generated by the expansion of the Tigard MITCH School site on the surrounding street system during the critical weekday peak hours was analyzed as follows: • Based on anticipated K-8 operations at the new location of the Tigard MITCH School by 2008, existing traffic volumes were adjusted to reflect estimated 2008 background traffic conditions. No other approved developments were identified, but a background growth factor was applied to existing traffic volumes in order to ensure a conservative analysis. • Weekday peak hour vehicle trips to and from the Tigard MITCH School site were estimated for the weekday morning and evening commute periods, and the mid-afternoon school peak. ' Existing traffic volumes on the roadways surrounding the site and the site's proximity to major roadways were evaluated to estimate the trip distribution patterns in the study area for vehicle trips generated by the site. ' Estimated site-generated traffic volumes for the AM and PM Weekday peak hours were assigned to the roadway network and added to the estimated 2008 background traffic volumes to represent future traffic conditions with full build-out of the site. ' Future Levels of Service (LOS) at key study area intersection were examined for 2008 conditions, assuming maximum enrollment. Future 2008 Background Traffic Volumes To assess the likely future traffic conditions regardless of the proposed development, increases in traffic due to general growth and other proposed developments in the vicinity of the site were estimated. Based on the City's adopted TSP, which projects an average annual increase of 2.0 percent per year in citywide vehicle trips, a slightly more conservative background growth rate of 2.5 percent per year was applied. No other proposed developments in the immediate vicinity were identified. Thus, to calculate the future background 2008 peak hour traffic volumes, existing volumes in Figure 3 were increased by 5 percent (2 years x 2.5% per year = 4%) to account for other increases in traffic due to sources outside the study area during the next two years. The resulting future background peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure S. Table 3 presents the estimated LOS results for the key study area intersection based on the projected future background 2008 weekday peak hour traffic volumes shown in Figure S. The LOS results show that the study area intersections will continue to operate at LOS C or better during both AM /PM peak hours, with slight increases in average delay and no LOS changes. Table 3: Future Background 2008 Weekday Levels of Service Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Mid-PM Peak Hour Avg Avg Avg Unsignalized Vehicle Vehicle Vehicle Delay V/C Delay V/C Delay V/C (Sec/Veh) Ratio LOS (Sec/Veh) Ratio LOS (Sec/Veh) Ratio LOS Canterbury Ln/103'' Ave 9 6 18 A 0 10 6 11 B 0 4 9 09 A 0 Critical Leg: EB Approach . . . . . . Canterbury Ln/ Inez St 9.8 0.01 A 9 3 0 01 A 9 6 02 A 0 Critical Leg: WB Approach . . . . ' Tigard MITCH School Page 7 August 2, 2006 Site-Generated Traffic Volumes Figure 1A shows the proposed site for the Tigard MITCH School, which will be a private school (K-8) located within the existing Calvin Presbyterian Church. Classes will be in session from 8:00 AM to 3:30 PM. The traffic analysis assumed 198 students, the maximum enrollment allowed by the school's charter. School staff anticipate the school will be in operation for two years before classes in all grades ' are in place and the maximum enrollment achieved. Access to the site will be provided via two main driveways providing access to the main parking area, one on SW Canterbury Lane and one on SW 103rd Avenue. The main entrance on SW Canterbury Lane is about 180 feet west of SW 103rd Avenue, and the main entrance on SW 103rd Avenue is about 280 feet north of SW Canterbury Lane. There is a ' small parking area and access on the west side of the school, but it is unlikely that there will be any need for school-related trips to use this driveway. ' The numbers of vehicle trips into and out of the proposed MITCH School site driveways were estimated using the weekday trip generation rates for Private School (K-8) (Land Use Code 534) published in the ITE Trip Generation Report (7th Edition), assuming the maximum enrollment of 198 students. Trip rates in this ITE publication are based on empirical observations performed at ' similar facilities located throughout the United States. Trip generation for K-8 Private Schools (Land Use Code 534) has unusually high correlation factors (R-squared) for peak hour trip generation: 0.96 and 0.86 for the AM and PM peaks, respectively. The AM peak hour trip generation is based on a formula, and the PM peak hour based on a trip rate. The MITCH school will continue its existing ' carpool-matching program, which could reduce the number of additional vehicle trips. However, due to the high correlation factors in the ITE data, no reduction was made to account for carpools. Trip generation calculations are included in the Appendix. While the MITCH School is expected to generate few if any vehicle trips during the weekday commute PM peak hour, to ensure a conservative analysis it was assumed that the school's PM commute peak hour trip generation would be 21 percent of the school peak hour trip generation rate for the AM peak hour. This factor was calculated by comparing the AM and PM peak hour trip generation rates per student for Private Schools (K-12), Land Use Code 536 in the Trip Generation Manual. (Land Use Code 534, K-8 Private Schools was used directly for the AM and mid-afternoon peak hour rates for the proposed school, but similar information is not provided for the PM peak hour.) Table 4 shows estimated peak hour trip generation for the MITCH Charter School during the morning and evening commute peak hours, and the mid-afternoon school peak hour. It is estimated that the school will generate approximately 174 vehicle trips during a typical morning peak hour and 129 trips during the weekday afternoon school peak hour. These periods represent the bulk of daily trip generation, with few if any trips expected during the evening commute peak hour. Table 4: Estimated Peak Hour Trip Generation for Maximum Enrollment of MITCH School (Both Typical Commute Peak and School Peak Hours) MITCH School ITE Land Use Code 534 (198 Students) AM Peak Hour School PM Peak Street System Hour PM Peak Hour Total I In I Out Total I In I Out I Total I In I Out 174 96 78 129 61 68 27 13 14 1 Distribution and Assignment of Site Generated Traffic Traffic generated by the MITCH Charter School was assigned to the roadway network based on existing traffic patterns and students' zip codes, which were provided of by the school for the current 166 students. Approximately 30% of school-generated traffic is expected to be to and from the north ' and east via SW 103rd Avenue and SW McDonald Street, with 50% to and from the south via SW 103rd Avenue and 20% to and from the west via Hwy 99W. Figure 6 displays the trip distribution and assignment based on existing traffic counts shown in Figure 3. 1 • 0 Tigard MITCH School August 2, 2006 Page 8 Total Future 2008 Traffic Volumes and Levels of Service Total future 2008 weekday peak hour traffic volumes were estimated by adding the future background traffic volumes displayed in Figure 5 to the volumes that would be generated with full enrollment at the MITCH School shown in Figure 6. The resulting total future 2008 weekday peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 7. Table 5 summarizes the results of total future 2008 weekday peak hour intersection analyses. The results in this table are similar to the results for the future background traffic conditions. One LOS change is projected, from LOS A to LOS B, based on a slight increase in average delay. Traffic operations are projected to remain acceptable at LOS B or better at all intersections during the weekday morning and evening commute peak hours, and the mid-afternoon school traffic peak hour. Table 5: Total Future 2008 Weekday Levels of Service Intersection Unsignalized Canterbury Ln/103rd Ave Critical Leg: EB Approach Canterbury Ln/ Inez St Critical Leg: WB Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Mid-PM Peak Hour Avg Avg Avg Vehicle Vehicle Vehicle Delay V/C Delay V/C Delay V/C (Sec/Veh) Ratio LOS (Sec/Veh) Ratio LOS (Sec/Veh) Ratio LOS 10.9 0.21 B 10.8 0.11 B 9.7 0.10 A 9.9 0.01 A 9.3 0.01 A 9.6 0.02 A An analysis was conducted to determine if a separate eastbound left turn lane would be warranted at the main SW Canterbury Lane entrance. These warrants are based on the number of vehicles turning left, the total approach volume, and the opposing conflicting volumes during the critical peak hour (usually the PM peak hour). As shown in Table 6, based on the volume criteria in the AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Streets and Highways, projected future traffic volumes will not meet the criteria for an eastbound left turn lane at the main SW Canterbury Lane access. Table 6: Results of 2008 Eastbound Left Turn Warrant Analysis along NW Cornell Road Projected 2008 PM Peak Hour I AASHTO Manual Total Approach Left Opposing Approach Warrant Intersection Volume Turns Volume Volume Criteria Met? EB along SW Canterbury Lane at 136 21 88 > 450 No Primary Site Access (15%) Total future 2008 southbound right turns at the site's SW 103rd Avenue access are very low (19 AM and 27 PM trips). Therefore, conducting right-turn lane warrants analyses would not be necessary. From our experience, traffic volume less than 40 vehicles during a peak hour do not meet warrants for requiring a separate right turn lanes, particularly on relatively low-volume streets such as SW 103rd Avenue where the estimated southbound daily volume is about 1,000 vehicles. Therefore, conducting a turn lane warrant analysis was not necessary. Queuing Analysis Queuing analysis was conducted at the intersection of SW Canterbury Lane/SW 103rd Avenue. The analysis of weekday queuing when school lets out reveals that the west leg of the intersection will have minimal (1 to 2 vehicles) queues with maximum school enrollment. The back-up caused by school will occur for only for a short period of time (15-20 minutes). The HCS model indicates that this backup will not extend back past the site's SW Canterbury Lane driveway, which is approximately 180 feet west of SW 103rd Avenue. Furthermore, if queues do develop, parents leaving school can stay inside the parking lot until the queue ahead clears. It should be noted that a majority of the traffic from the SW Canterbury Lane access is expected to turn right toward Hwy 99W. These drivers should have minimal delays 10 seconds). Tigard MITCH School Page 9 August 2, 2006 CIRCULATION PLAN, PARKING AND SITE ACCESS Figure IA shows the existing site layout. The school will be located within the existing church on the site, which has approximately 177 on-site parking spaces, including about 30 in a west parking area presumed to be a staff parking lot and about 147 in the main parking lot east of the church. The main lot has two driveways, one approximately 20 feet wide onto SW 103rd Avenue and one about 28 feet wide onto SW Canterbury Lane. Both driveways have ample clearance from the SW 103rd Avenue/SW Canterbury Lane intersection (approximately 180 feet to the main SW Canterbury Lane driveway and 280 feet to the SW 103rd Avenue driveway), and both provide at least two car lengths of internal stacking area. Both adjacent streets are flat and straight in the immediate vicinity of the site. The City should install school zone warning signs along the site's SW 103rd ISCHOOL11 Avenue frontage, as shown to the right. (School zone signage along the SW Canterbury Lane frontage is not needed because the speed humps adjacent to the school already ensure speeds consistent with school zones). With the new SPEED speed zone laws recently adopted by the Oregon State Legislature, the only supplemental sign allowed for speed zone signage adjacent to the school is "School Days 7 AM - 5 PM." School zone signage applies for both public and 20 private schools. Bicycle Parking Needs SCHOOL DAYS The City parking requirements equate to 48 bicycle parking spaces (6 per classroom). This is excessive, because the geographic area of the MITCH school MIN is much greater than a typical elementary school. Even if the MITCH School were a typical public elementary, the City's bicycle parking requirements are substantially more than either Beaverton or Tualatin. Beaverton would require 22 spaces for a school the size of the MITCH school with maximum 198 students (1 space per 9 students), less than half the number required by Tigard. Tualatin would require 1 space per 5 students, or 40 spaces the MITCH school. Either of these parking standards would be excessive for the MITCH School, a citywide school. Bicycle parking demand at the MITCH school will be generated almost exclusively by students from the ' residential area immediately surrounding the school. Based on zip code information provided by the school representatives, 55 students (about 1/3 of the student body) are from the zip code area including the site. If 10 percent of these students rode their bikes - which is a conservatively high mode split estimate as can be seen by visiting a typical elementary school - six spaces would easily accommodate bicycle parking demand for the MITCH School. CONCLUSIONS ' Based on the results of the analysis described in this report, it is concluded that the proposed MITCH Charter School can be operated at the Calvin Presbyterian Church without adversely affecting traffic operations or safety near the site. Furthermore, key intersections and roadways in the study area will continue to operate at acceptable Levels of Service with the school's maximum enrollment of 198 students. The internal circulation system serves the site well, with driveways set far enough back from adjacent intersections to avoid potential traffic conflicts. One specific safety measure that should be considered by the City regardless of this application is to trim or have the property owner trim a few bushes in the landscaping that affect sight distance from the two main driveways. ' If you have any questions related to the data or analysis contained in this report, please contact me directly at (503) 690-8080 ext. 1365. R P%E7,- Howard ' Sincerely, ~NG1NE16540Roll, P.E. Transportation Engineer Attachments v OREGON, , ,9y16 19g ZO y0 WARS 1EXPIRATION DATE: • • Figure 1: Site Area And Vicinity Map r~'" I' I I~+Y=Faiihav jf Stl ' ~~y~~,,>~ ~ ~,,d,5w-tymara-~t (SSW to _ « 6 ( SW-=Edgewood=Sr f r „ ~ 17 =mot:~i Donald LJ~ ~I I Y I1 l J ZJ W~ V-fJ1C£i r j 99W r`LfL, ~ _ ~ a~.` _ Inez- 3 i~ _ OA~'~~~ ~ ~,y.-1`ir~ S~'W.~oodvievip•` ~ ;,L--~ j i~ Ic~~i ~ St I-- ma r- J Lq }ae. , y~1 ~G King r'' 4, SW.-Ka rl 1 f `,R~ itaeva-St_ ~7y ~~~fffr ~ Tigard MITCH School Proposed Site T .F Ar R r et y, r N i a. A N Drawing Not To Scale Proposed Site ~~1 OR06.062.T01 Tigard MITCH School QC ~J E"ineen • 0 Figure 1A: Site Area Map of Existing Calvin Presbyterian Church ' Main Driveway \ SW 103rd Avenue YmMYwilYA9 . ~ # iMiM1 1 J k C J fit, ' Main Driveway eolp AR i O• Ilk 1 owl, Secondary Driveway 'All QC T S 1 OR06.062.T01 Tigard MITCH School Engtnces 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • Figure 2: Location of Proposed Tigard MITCH School And Surrounding Roadway Network rfW-M- =Mu~lcr ock-Ln 1 OD I sw~~ d _b-lN_IneiSL- d SW Murdoc C c J M A QCTS') Engineers .as rx~, N Drawing Not To Scale Traffic Signal is Stop Sign Proposed Site Driveway OR06.062.T01 Tigard MUCH School 0 1 1 1 0 Figure 3: Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes In The Vicinity Of The Proposed Tigard MITCH School -\17. a v~ MN k,_ 61 2 (2) t r( )y k~- r' 2 (4) o.. July 2006 AM/PM 3-4 School PM Peak Hour peaks Tigard W-~~OGk~?I l ' Skl! Muidojck=Ln / 1l~ (50) J (19) M ~ 3-4 School PM Peak Hour Q Englnee~s va.a.=mw (35)90-) (30) 40 July 2006 AM/PM peaks A N Drawing Not To Scale Traffic Signal RP Stop Sign AL Proposed Site Driveway AM(PM) Peak Hour Volumes (Afternoon School) Peak Hour Volumes OR06.062.T01 Tigard MITCH School 0 0 Figure 4: Traffic Collisions In The Vicinity of The Proposed Tigard MITCH School (]an 2001 to Dec 2005) =Mu►doo -Ln m 23 Al Key: RE = Rear-End S/S = Sideswipe Fix Obj. = Fixed Object PDO = Property Damage [NJ = Injury FAT = Fatality Ace Rate = Average Number of Incidents Per Million Entering Vehicles (,,CTS) Enptnecn erove I.~ RE =0 Angle = 0 r FixObj.=0 S/S = 0 i nda-Oy- PDO = 0 IV g171a INJ = 0 Crash Rate = 0.0 \~_m4 I O ` __SW__lnez_St~ RE=0 Angle = 0 ~sW-MUTdoc E Pt - Fix Obj. = 2 j S/S = 0 i PDO = 2 INJ = 0 Crash Rate = 0.38 A N Drawing Not T o Scale Traffic Signal Stop Sign Proposed Site Driveway 0R06.062.T0 1 Tigard MITCH School • CTS Fnglnee~s Figure 5: Future 2008 Background Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes SW=McDonala- I ' 'r vn o - o r 1 (6) ~i asvv ~~i (7) 2 (2) t 1 2(2) nda-C. t Lv o N v 3-4 School PM Peak Hour Tigard ,~aaGk-a1--~ ] 7nff. " IZ', Utd O.CILIJr/ / / m / N H T- (53) (20) - - -_.S.W. __InezlSt_ C N N a, (37) 94 (32) 42 N ~i 3-4 School PM Peak Hour A N Drawing Not To Scale Traffic Signal Stop Sign AL Proposed Site Driveway AM(PM) Peak Hour Volumes (Afternoon School) Peak Hour Volumes OR06.062.TOI Tigard MITCH School 0 • Figure 6: Trip Distribution And Assignment I I~ I~ C1 M A 30% 3-4 School PM Peak Hour 20% Tigard v g A~SW Inez SL ry..Lal- a` M 50% (2) 2 00 Site-Generated Traffic In AM Peak 96 Mid- afternoon 61 Peak PM Peak 13 ACTS) Englneeu .acs-mv Out 78 68 14 i1 3-4 School PM Peak Hou N Drawing Not To Scale Traffic Signal Stop Sign Proposed Site Driveway AM(PM) Peak Hour Volumes (Afternoon School ) Peak Hour Volumes OR06.062.T01 Tigard MITCH School • Figure 7: Total Future 2008 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 3-4 School PM Peak Hour ..a R N )(2) N v 7 'SYV_InezSt~ _v M W N V J (37) 94 (32) 42 ff LO 0 ~ Os ~ v QCTS*) Eng7ncros 3-4 School PM Peak Hour A N Drawing Not To Scale Traffic Signal RP Stop Sign -A Proposed Site Driveway AM(PM) Peak Hour Volumes (Afternoon School) Peak Hour V olumes OR06.062.T01 Tigard MITCH School STUDY AREA TYPICAL VIEWS MITCH School Access Points Tigard, Oregon #1: View EAST along Canterbury Lane from western site access (bush needs to be trimmed) #2: View WEST along Canterbury Lane from western site access (bush needs to be trimmed) r #3: View to EAST along Canterbury from main entrance (clear to intersection) Photos Taken by CTS Engineers, Page 1 • 0 #4: View to WEST along Canterbury from main entry 250 ft 10' from edge of pavement) glop& #5: View to NORTH along 103r° (360 ft to flag, 15' Prom edge of pavement) #6: View to SOU H along 103 350 it available 1J from edge o pavement IF lower branches trimmed) Photos Taken by CTS Engineers, Page 2 STUDY AREA TYPICAL VIEWS MITCH School Access Points Tigard, Oregon 0 0 Analysis of Crashes in Study Area, 2001-2005 1 1 1 j 0 Project 6 032 Tigard MITCH School Accident Analysis Worksheet 2001-2005 Intersection: SW 103rd Avenue & SW Canterbury !n Percent Percent Property Rear End 0 0% Damage Only 2 100% Angle 0 0% Injury 0 0% Turn 0 0% Total 2 Fixed Ob) 2 100% Total 2 PM Peak Hour 320 ADT 2,909 Assumed to be PM Peak Hour/11 percent Accident Rate= (Number of Accidents)/5) / (ADTx 365)'1,000,000 Vehides Accident Rate- 0.38 Average number of accidents per million entering vehicles 0 1 1 1 1 r Trip Generation Worksheets t z i 0 0 TRIP GENERATION WORKSHEET Development: Size: MITCH School 198 Students ITE Land Use Code: Variable: Private School (K-8) Code 534 Number of Students (S) Total Weekday Trips Not Given Enter Exit Total Vehicle Trips N/A N/A N/A Site Distribution N/A N/A N/A Weekday AM Peak Hour Trips Ln(T) = 1.00 Ln(S) - 0.13 Enter ( Exit Total Vehicle Trips 96 78 174 Site Distribution 55% 45% 100% Weekday PM Trips (Peak Hour of Generator) T= 0.58x(S)+14.03 Enter Exit Total Vehicle Trips 61 68 129 Site Distribution 47% 53% 100% Weekday PM Peak Hour (21% of AM Peak Rate) (Note: MITCH School is not expected to generate ANY PM Peak Hr Trips. This information is included only to show that AM peak is worst case) Enter Exit Total Vehicle Trips 13 14 27 Site Distribution N 47% 53% 100% CTS Engineers, Inc. TRIP GENERATION WORKSHEET RATES Development: MITCH School Size: 198 Students ITE Land Use Code: Private School (K-12), Code 536 (7th Edition Variable: Number of Students (S) NOTE. THIS WORKSHEET USED ONLY TO ESTIMATE THE RATIO OF PM TO AM TRIP GENERATION Weekday AM Peak Hour Trips T = 0.79x(S) Enter Exit I Total Vehicle Trips 95 I 61 I 156 Site Distribution 61% 39% I 100% Weekday PM Peak Hour Trips T= 0.17x(S) Enter Exit Total Vehicle Trips 15 I 19 I 34 Site Distribution 43% I 57% 100% RATIO OF PM TO AM TRIP GENERATION = 341156 = 22% 1 CTS Engineers, Inc. 0 0 r Left Turn Lane Warrant Analysis CTS Engineers, Inc. Project: MITCH School DATE: July 31, 2006 Location: Canterbury Ln & Main Entrance Analyst: HR Scenario: Total Future AM Traffic check for EBL Speed: 25 % Left Turns 15% Opposing Volume: 88 Required Advancing Volume #N/A Advancing Volume: 136 Left Turns: 21 Meets Warrant: #N/A Left Turn Warrant Curves 1000 v'~F~c zrn Interpolated 15%Curve 900 - - - - - -AASHTO 20% Curve gsr^~~y~ ♦ Assessed Volumes 800 d 700 It ts3ez sx`~ r.us u 5E" 4. § f J*.~ i3 600 ` LA a 500 W; I ar r-1 , S 0 400 ' ' svaer si*$~,+%~ s _ ~;Sy~s^~ sS.kK' 4yiv 1 12' `~~k'rk ->!,s Y'"Tri Q 300 zti~Y s s 3F41s NA Y j 200 uKy~s •Y`S'a i?.: .d a'eh'L3ft C - # i .;:%~5'".'S s'+3'Jfi"y% t 1(]0' uzS ;4g dk u°e 3w y tours *19;YS c$ u2s n zn_ s 1, MY Lefiu~nE nes Should 8e Gons,dered For Votufnes AOp've Cu+ag~q C 0-1 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Advancing Volume AASHTO Guide for Left-Turn Lanes On Two-Lane Highways 40 MPH Advancing Volume Opposing Left Turns Volume 5% 10% 20% 30% 100 720 515 390 340 200 640 470 350 305 400 510 380 275 245 600 410 305 225 200 800 330 240 180 160. Source: AASHTO, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highway and Streets (2001) Shaded Values Interpolated Warrant Curve Required Advancing Advancing Volume (Opposing 1Advancinq - Opposing Lower I Left Turns I Upper Lower r #N/A I #N/A Volume 10%1 15% 1 20% Actual 1 881 #N/A 100 515 447 390 Upper 1001 447 200 470 405 350 400 380 323 275 600 305 261 225 800 240 207 180, 0:1Projects CTS16.051-6.07416.062 Tigard MITCH Schoollworksheets16.062 AASHTO Left Turn Warrant 8/1/2006 i 9 Existing Weekday Peak Hour and Mid-afternoon Peak Hour Turn Movement Counts Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak INTERSECTION: SW 103rd-SW Canterbury Lane WEATHER: 31 105 i t 22 9 0 J i V 3B 4 86 0 t 0 0 r 0.83 • 0 126 40 7 r 0 y 0 'f f P 16 19 0 49 5 [ SW 103rd ] 0 0 ,~7,',*Jt@+ 0 0 4 y9n R9'` p lop ~p Peak-Hour: 7:15 AM 8:15 AM [ SW Canterbury Lane ] w t~ '..1M ~S}v P~ aC~. r --i I • Method for determining peak lour. Total Entering Volume QC JOB M 10182701 DATE: 7/25/2006 9.7 2.9 i t 9.1 11.1 0.0 d i 4 5.3 4- 1.2 f. 0.0 « 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 mk 5.0 0.0 y 0.0 h ! r 0.0 10.5 D.0 i t 6.1 [ 7 SW 103rdj 4 NORTH y~ 1 4r i r f 'SEE LEGEND SHEET 5-MIN COUNT Sw 1 03rd SW 103rd SW Canterbury Lan SW Canterbury Lane I PERIOD (Northbound) I (Southbound) (Eastbound) l (Westbound) TOTAL HOURLY BEGINNING AT -1 Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U I TOTALS 7:00 AM 1 6 2 0 1 0 1 3 [ 10 0 5 1 0 0 0 I 27 1 7:15 AM 4 ' 2 0 0 1 5 23 0 11 0' 0 0 46 7:30 AM 6 8 0 0 2 5 24 0 10 0 0 0 55 I 7:45 AM 2 5 0 Q 1 7 2¢ P 17 0 0 0 58 181531 8:00 AM 4 4 0 0 5 5 13 0 2 0 0 0 33 192 8:15 AM 5 4 0 0 0 3 8 0 5 0 0 0 25 171 8:30 AM 5 7 0 0 4 3 10 0 4 0 0 0 33 149 8:45 AM 3 3 0 0 6 3 11 0 11 0 0 0 37 128 PEAK 15-MIN Northbound I Southbound Eastbound Westbound FLOW RATES Left Thnu Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U TOTAL All Vehicles 8 20 0 0 4 28 104 0 68 0 0 0 232 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles Railroad Stopped Buses Counter Comments: tepon generated on 72812006 SOURCE: Duality Counts, LLC (http:/Mww.quaBlycounts.net i ~ • i Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak tour: Total Entering Volume INTERSECTION: SW 103rd-SW Canterbury Lane OC JO B 101 82702 ' WEATHER: DATE: 7/25/2006 ~ * Peak-Hour: 4:4 5 PM 5:45 PM 0.0 1.9 4 t 4 12e ao o 0.0 0.0 0.0 i V J i 200 • 35 J 1' 0 a [ SW Canterbury Lane j 0.0 0 2.9 % 0.0 4. 0.0 0 ♦ 0.83 ♦ 0 0.0 ♦ ♦ 0.0 62 r► 27 1 r 0 0 i}'w;y y. 1.6 = r 0.0 0.0 r► 0.0 t r 72 is 0 ~ 0 r• 0.0 0.0 0.0 67 90 0.0 0.0 I SW 103rd j g [ SW 103rd ] o ..)l ~ • v <''c » r 1 P a NORTH 1 P9oPot p ti 90 a i #i~ 'BEE LEGEND SHEET 1 5-MIN COUNT PERIOD SW 103rd I (Northbound) SW 103rd {Southbound) I SW Canterbury Lan (Eastbound) ey SW Canterbury Lane I (Westbound) TOTAL HOURLY BEGINNING AT I Left Thru Right U _ Left_ Thru Right U I Left Thr_u Right U I Left Thru Right U TOTALS 2:00 PM 2 6 0 0 3 6 10 0 3 0 0 0 30 2:15 PM 4 5 0 0 7 10 9 0 1 0 0 0 36 2:30 PM 3 3 0 0 3 10 2 0 6 0 0 0 27 2:45 PM 5 3 0 0 4 8 4 0 3 0 0 0 27 120 3:00 PM 7 2 0 0 7 7 7 0 7 0 0 0 37 127 3:15 PM 3 3 0 0 0 5 16 0 4 0 0 0 31 122 3:30 PM 7 3 0 0 0 18 16 0 3 0 0 0 47 142, 3:45 PM 6 6 0 0 4 9 11 0 5 0 0 0 41 156 4:00 PM 8 2 0 0 6 23 9 0 6 0 0 0 54 173 ' 4:15 PM 8 5 0 0 5 15 10 0 3 0 0 0 46 188 4:30 PM 11 6 0 0 8 27 10 0 7 0 0 0 69 210 4:45 PM 14 4 0 0 5 30 8 0 8 0 0 0 69 238 5:00 PM 22 2 0 0 10 25 8 0 8 0 0 0 73 257 5:15 PM 14 4 0 0 12 38 8 0 6 0 0 0 82 293 1 i 5:30 PM Q 0 Q 13 35 11 0 7 Q 0 0 96 3201 5:45 PM 23 6 0 0 2 26 8 0 4 0 0 0 69 320 PEAK 15-MIN I Northbound I Southbound I Eastbound I Wes tbound TOTAL 1 FLOW RATES I Left Thru Right U I - Left_ Thru Right U Left I Right U u Thru Right U I Left Thr All Vehicles 88 32 0 0 52 140 44 0 28 0 0 0 384 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles d Railroad Stopped Buses Counter Cornmenfs. leport generated an 7/28/2006 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http:fhvww.queElymunts.net) J 1 1 1 0 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak INTERSECTION: SW 103rd-SW Inez St. WEATHER: 31 102 i t 0 29 2 • 4 .1 0 4. 0 2 * 4 0 . 0.87 • 0 0 0 7 2 ► 6 ~ ♦ r 0 100 4 i t 31 104 ( SW 103rd ] 1 *4111. o 4 6 y`t~ Og `p. Qo3 Peak-Hour: 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM [ SW Inez St. ] T'V • Method for determining peak hour: Totat Entering Volume OC JOB M 10182703 DATE: 7/2512006 12.9 3.9 ♦ t 0.0 10.3 50.0 J i 4 0.0 0.0 _ % 100.04. 50.0 0.0 ♦ ``;i` 0.0 010 0.0 7 0.0 ♦ 33.3 ~ ♦ r 0.0 2.0 25.0 + t 9.7 2.9 [ SW 103rd ) 4 t- NORTH r f, J • V L • • 7 4r ~ t r a • 'SEE LEGEND SHEET 5-MIN COUNT SW 103rd SW 103rd SW Inez St. SW Inez St. PERIOD (1414 ound) I (Southbound) I Eastbound) (Westbound) I TOTAL HOURLY BEGINNING AT Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U I TOTALS 7:00 AM 1 0 12 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 16 1 7:15 AM ' 0 26 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 .0 33 7:30 AM 0 29 3 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 I 7!45 AM 0 28 1 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 40 1271 8:00 AM 0 17 0 1 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 28 139 8:15 AM 0 13 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 123 8:30 AM 0 15 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 107 BA5 AM 0 12 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 89 taport generated on 71211=6 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http:IA"w.quality=unts.net) PEAK 15-MIN I Northbound Southbound Eastbound I Westbound I TOTAL FLOW RATES Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 0 112 4 4 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 160 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles Railroad Stopped Buses Counter Comments: 0 1 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Inlersedion Peak INTERSECTION: SW 103rd--SW Inez St. WEATHER: 157 40 4 f 0 157 0 J ♦ 4 0 4. 0 1 2 0 6 0 + 0.85 0 0 y 0 7 4 4 1 f r 0 3B 4 4 f 161 42 [ SW 103rd ] 0 0 Og G~ O 49'1 4b, 4 NORTH I ' i V J O t ~ s ~ • r i 'SEE LEGEND SHEET 5-MIN COUNT SW 103rd SW 103rd I SW Inez St. SW Inez St. PERIOD I (Northbound) I (Southbound) (Eastbound) T I (Westbound) TOTAL HOURLY BEGINNING AT Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U I Left hru Right U I Left Thru Right U TOTALS 2:00 PM 0 3 6 0 3 0 0 0 0 10 0 3 25 2:15 PM 0 8 10 3 6 0 0 0 0 9 0 1 37 ' 230 PM 0 3 8 4 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 25 2:45 PM 0 4 10 6 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 29 116 3:00 PM 0 7 5 2 5 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 31 122 3:15 PM 0 9 1 6 12 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 29 114 3:30 PM 0 14 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 124 3:45 PM • 0 12 2 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 122 ' 4:00 Pm 0 9 1 0 27 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 39 130 4:15 PM 0 11 3 0 19 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 34 135 4:30 PM 0 14 1 0 34 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 53 153 4:45 PM 0 9 0 0 31 0 0. 0 0 3 0 1 44 170 5:00 PM 0 7 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 173 ' I 5:15 PM 0 6 3 0 46 0 0 0 Q 0 0 t ¢0 199 1 5:30 PM 0 14 1 0 43 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 59 .205 5:45 PM 0 8 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 36 197 PEAK 15•MIN ! Northbound I Southbound I Eastbound I Westbound FLOW RATES I Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U TOTAL Ail Vehicles 0 32 12 0 192 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 240 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles Railroad Stopped Buses Counter Comments: ' tepon generated on 728/2006 SOURCE: Quality Counts. LLC (htlp: dw .quatilymunts.nel- Peak-Hour: 4:45 PM 5:45 PM [ SW Inez SL ) • Method for detemuning peak hour. Total Entering Volum- OC JOB 10182704 DATE: 7125!2006 0.0 2.5 i t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t 0.0 ♦ 0.0 0.0 • 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 1 f ` 0.0 y 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 t 0.0 2.4 [ SW 103rd J x„ ,.ii. Hv9~ F:t QIJV~,Jf. " q.. S. 0 ' Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak INTERSECTION: Church Drwy 1 & 2--SW Canterbury Lane WEATHER: 1 1 Peak-Hour: 7:15 AM 8:15 AM i t ' 1 0 0 r 4 t1. 40 ♦ 1 t 0 4. 39 [ SW Canterbury Lane j 125 • 0.85 , f 39 ' 126 i 0 r 0 125 ' 0 0 0 0 0 :r [ Church Orwy 1 & 2 ] I Q: a P VAINTS' 0 t+t 0 0 4~ To d 4 S. 4 y O • ~ r '1 • r •SEE LEGEND SHEET 5-MIN COUNT C hurch Orwy1 & 2 I Church Drwy 1 & 2 SW Canterbury Lana SW Canterbury Lane ( HOURLY PERIOD (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) I (Westbound) I TOTAL TOTALS BEGINNING AT Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U I Left ThrU Right U I Left Thru Right U I _ 7:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 I 0 15 0 1 0 9 0 1 24 1 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 32 0 0 11 0 44 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 10 0 47 I N5 AM 0 0 0 q 0 0 0 40 0 0 9 0 gQ 1g4 ! 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 16 0 0 9 0 26 166 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 8 0 22 144 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 8 0 21 118 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 7 1 29 98 PEAK IS-MIN I Northbound I Southbound Eastbound I ' Westbound TOTAL FLOW RATES I Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 160 0 0 36 0 196 ' Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 ' Bicycles Railroad Stopped Buses Counter Comments: • Method for determining peak hour. Total Entering Volume QC JOB M 10182705 DATE: 7/25/2006 0.0 0.0 i t 0.0 0.9 0.0 5.0 F 0.0 t 0.0 t 5.1 3.2 3.2 0.0 7 - 0.0 i 3.2 ~ • r 0.0 0.0 0.0 i t 0.0 0.0 ( Church Drwy 1 & 2 j 4 NORTH 4_- :sport generated on 7282006 SOURCE: Quality Counts. LLC (httpJANww.qualitycounis.net Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour. Total Entering Volume ' INTERSECTION: Church Drwy 1 & 2--SW Canterbury Lane QC JOB ft: 10182706 WEATHER: DATE: 712512006 2 2 Peak-Hour: 4:30 PM 5:30 PM . f ' 2 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 1. 2 J IL 0 4. 0 [ SW Canterbury Lane j 0.0 4. 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0 ► I 0.50 I♦ 0 0.0 0.0 ' 2 0 s 0 0 ,q 0.0 ► 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0z'i+ 0.0 0.0 0.0 <t ,j 0 0 k- - 0.0 0.0 [ Church Drwy 1 & 2 ] 0.1d.v, I Church Drwy 1 & 2 ] e t+ t o o 4 ' o II NORTH 6 ~ y ® « 010 'SEE LEGEND SHEET 5-MIN COUNT rChurch Orwy 1 8 2 i Church Drwy 1& 2 I SW Canterbury Lanj SW Canterbury Lane PERIOD (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) TOTAL HOURLY BEGINNING AT Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U TOTALS 2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 215 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 3:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 ' 3:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4:15PM_ - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4:30 Pkt Q 0 4 Q 0 1 1 4 0 Q Q 4 2 2 I 4:45 PM . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.- 5..00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0' 0 0 1 3 5:15 Phil 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 ' PEAK N Northbound I Southbound Eastbound I Westbound FLOW RATES ~ Left Thru Right U ' Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U ~ Left Thru Right U TOTAL All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 6 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles Railroad Stopped Buses Counter Comments: ' teport generated on 7121V2006 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (hhpJhvww.quahtycounls.net • Type of peak hour being reported; Intersection Peak INTERSECTION: SW 103rd-Church Orwy 3 WEATHER: 31 103 i t 0 31 0 J i v 0 « 0 IL 0 0 0 « 0.84 1 « 0 o ~o 'r 0 0 * r 0 103 0 31 03 [ SW 103rd ] 1 2 4 y a4'° ~9a Peak-Hour: 7:15 AM 8:15 AM [ Church Drwy 3 J hip =>.'°Mpll s]`f a ysi 1c, Ml '~~NIN S.. i • Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volumn_ CIC JOB 10182707 DATE: 7125/2006 12.9 3.9 i t 0.0 12.9 0.0 i 0.0 « 0.0 1- 0.0 4. 0.0 0.0 « 0.0 0.0 * 0.0 0.0 * 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 i t 12.9 3.9 [ SW 103rd ] 4 NORTH 1 • P ® w y « t 'SEE LEGEND SHEET 5-MIN COUNT I SW 103rd SW 103rd f d! Church tb (E Drwy 3 d) ( Church Drwy 3 (Westbound) HOURLY PERIOD (North bound) (South boun I as oun TOTAL TOTALS BEGINNING AT, Left Thru Right U Left __Th ~ht U I Left Thru Rilyht U I Left Thru Rat U 1 7:00 AM 1 0 12 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 1 16 7:15 AM 0 27 0 0 6 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 33 7:30 AM 0 28 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 1 7:45 AM Q 31 0 Q 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 1231 8:00 AM 0 17 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 134 8:15 AM 0 13 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 17 118 8:30 AM 0 16 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 107 8:45 AM 0 12 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 88 PEAK 15-MIN Northbound 1 Southbound I Eastbound Westbound I TOTAL FLOW RATES Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U j Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 0 124 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 160 Heavy Trucks 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles Railroad Stopped Buses Counter Comments: teport generated on 7282000 SOURCE: Duality Counts, LLC (httpJA ww.quaIRycounlenef • Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for detemdning peak hour. Total Entering Vdum-_ INTERSECTION: SW 103rd-Church Drwy 3 OC JOB 10182708 WEATHER: DATE: 7125/2006 Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM a.o o.o e o 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' d ♦ v r i 4 10 4. 0 .0 116 0 4. 0 1 Church Drwy 3 ] 0.0 * 0.0 t 0.0 F 0.0 o . 0.63 « 0 0.0 .0 . 0.0 0 a 1 r 0 '0 0 .~a;=L'•' ?s„ 0.0 -0 0.01 0.0 r► 0.0 ' _ ? 2 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 2 1. 0.0 0.0 [ SW 103rd ] 1 ( SW 103rd ] 0 NORTH 011oo « ao- 4o d l 14a1o~: 'SEE LEGEND SHEET 5•1114IN COUNT PERIOD SW 103rd I (Northbound) SW 103rd (Southbound) I Church Orwy 3 (Eastbound) Church Drwy 3 (Westbound) TOTAL HOURLY BEGINNING AT Left Thru Rfj;ht U I Left Thru Right_ U I Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U TO TALS 2:00 PM 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 2:15 PM 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 ' 2:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2:45 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 3:00 PM 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 3:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3:30 PM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 3:45 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 4 8 ' 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4:15 PM 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 9 4:30 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 5:00 PM. 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6. 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 1 5:3QQM 1 0 Q Q 0 3 Q Q 0 9 Q Q 4 8 r y 5:45 PM 1 0' 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 D 0 0 3 10 ' PEAK 15-MIN 1 Northbound Southbound I Eastbound I Westbound TOTAL FLOW RATES j Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 4 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles Railroad Stopped Buses Counter Comments: teport generated on 7202006 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http•L/h~.qualitycounts.net 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 realc Hour and realt 14our Ex ~d.aftern M do~u'mes Graf f W eettday ist►n9 *%nn 0 0 MITIGS - am Mon Jul 31, 2006 18:31:57 Page 1-1 Existing 2006 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (AM) Tigard MITCH School Level of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future volume Alternative) Intersection #5 SW 103rd Ave & SW Canterbury Ln Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: A( 9.61 Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Canterbury In Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Count Date: 25 Jul 2006 << AM Peak Hour Base Vol: 16 19 0 0 9 22 90 0 40 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 16 19 0 0 9 22 90 0 40 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 16 19 0 0 9 22 90 0 40 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 PHF Volume: 19 23 0 0 11 27 108 0 48 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 19 23 0 0 11 27 108 0 48 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 37 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 86 xxxx 24 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1548 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 916 xxxx 1052 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1548 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 907 xxxx 1052 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.12 xxxx 0.05 xxxx xxxx xxxx I--------------- Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 947 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 7.4 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A * * * * * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.6 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. • • MITIG8 - pm Mon Jul 31, 2006 19:00:26 Page 1-1 Existing 2006 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (PM) Tigard MITCH School Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 SW 103rd Ave & SW Canterbury Ln Average Delay (sec/veh): 3.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 10.51 Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Canterbury Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 it 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( Volume module: Base Vol: 75 18 0 0 40 130 35 0 30 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 initial Bse: 75 18 0 0 40 130 35 0 30 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 75 18 0 0 40 130 35 0 30 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 PHF Volume: 90 22 0 0 48 157 42 0 36 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 90 22 0 0 48 157 42 0 36 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx i,- : xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 205 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 329 xxxx 127 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1367 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 666 xxxx 924 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1367 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 630 xxxx 924 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.07 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.07 xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx xxxx I--------------- Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * + Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 738 xxxxx xxxx xxxx .,.--,X SharedQueue: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.4 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 10.5 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS : A * * * * * * B ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxJ{ 10.5 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. 0 0 MITIG8 - Mid-PM School PeakMon Jul 31, 2006 18:56:09 Page 1-1 Existing 2006 weekday MId-afternoon School Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Tigard MITCH School Level of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 SW 103rd Ave & SW Canterbury Ln Average Delay (sec/veh): 5.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.31 Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Canterbury Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------------I~--------------- Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Count Date: 25 Jul 2006 << Mid-afternoon peak Base Vol: 23 14 0 0 11 40 50 0 19 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 23 14 0 0 11 40 50 0 19 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 23 14 0 0 11 40 50 0 19 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 D.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 PHF Volume: 26 17 0 0 13 48 60 0 23 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 28 17 0 0 13 48 60 0 23 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx ,o= xxxxx II--------------- Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 61 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 110 xxxx 37 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1516 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 887 1035 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1516 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 875 xxxx 1035 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.07 xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx I--------------- 11--------------- Level of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 914 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.3 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.3 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A * * * # * # A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.3 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. • • MITIG8 - am Mon Jul 31, 2006 18:33:57 Page 1-1 Existing 2006 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (AM) Tigard MITCH School Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) w+++w++w+w+++w++w+++,twww+++w++++++++*++++w+++*+w++++***w*w*w::w+w+w++w++++++++++ Intersection #4 SW 103rd Ave & SW Inez St w+www+*+r,rw+*+++*+w+w*+w+++**+++ww+**++www+*++w+www++++*+++++w++++*++**+ww*+*+*++ Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.71 +ww+++www++++++wwwwwwwwww+wwww++++*+++++++w++++ww***++www*ww+www+*++++ww*wwwww** Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Inez St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Count Date: 25 Jul 2006 << Mid-PM Base Vol: 0 100 4 2 30 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 100 4 2 30 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 100 4 2 30 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 PHF Volume: 0 115 5 2 34 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 115 5 2 34 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.9 xxxx 6.7 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.0 xxxx 3.8 I--------------- Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 120 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 156 xxxx 117 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx .,.,.,..x 1403 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 735 xxxx 820 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1403 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 734 xxxx 820 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx 0.00 I--------------- Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move : * * * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 775 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.7 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * * * * * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xx......,. 9.7 ApproachLOS: * * * A ++++wwwwwwww++ww+++w++wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww+wwwww+www+w++www+w++*+wwwww+wwwwwwwwwwww Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. 0 0 MITIG8 - pm Mon Jul 31, 2006 18:33:35 Page 1-1 Existing 2006 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (PM) Tigard MITCH School Level of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 SW 103rd Ave & SW Inez St Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.2] Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Inez St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 40 4 0 160 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 40 4 0 160 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 40 4 0 160 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 PHF Volume: 0 47 5 0 18B 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 47 5 0 188 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 I--------------- Capacity module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 238 xxxx 49 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 751 xxxx 1019 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 751 xxxx 1019 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx 0.00 I--------------- Level of service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx x xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 864 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.2 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.2 ApproachLOS: * * * A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. 0 • MITIG8 - Mid-PM School PeakMon Jul 31, 2006 18:52:01 Page 1-1 Existing 2006 Weekday MId-afternoon School Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Tigard MITCH School Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 SW 103rd Ave & SW Inez St Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.51 Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Inez St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------------II---------------~ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include include Lanes : 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ` Volume Module: Count Date: 25 Jul 2006 << Mid-PM Base Vol: 0 45 8 8 55 0 0 0 0 6 0 7 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 45 8 8 55 0 0 0 0 6 0 7 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 45 8 8 55 0 0 0 0 6 0 7 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 PHF Volume: 0 52 9 9 63 0 0 0 0 7 0 8 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 52 9 9 63 0 0 0 0 7 0 8 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.9 xxxx 6.7 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.0 xxxx 3.8 I--------------- ---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 61 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 138 xxxx 56 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1475 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 754 xxxx 890 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1475 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 750 xxxx 890 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx 0.01 I--------------- Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx x0ocx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A * * * ' Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx x...,.., xxxx 820 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx .x xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.5 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * * * * * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xx-.., xxxxxx 9.5 ApproachLOS: * * * A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. 0 cday pe211t ZOOS vv eel und ZD peak 1r1our ro n tire 8~~~id-af,~ern,~o 'F,~ M Hour and '~g Traf f, ~c ~/alume s 1 • 9 MITIG8 - am Mon Jul 31, 2006 18:59:49 Page 1-1 Future Background 2008 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (AM) Tigard MITCH School Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 SW 103rd Ave & SW Canterbury Ln Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.61 Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Canterbury Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include include Include Include Lanes : 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Count Date: 25 Jul 2006 << AM Peak Hour Base Vol: 16 19 0 0 9 22 90 0 40 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 17 20 0 0 9 23 94 0 42 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 17 20 0 0 9 23 94 0 42 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 PHF Volume: 20 24 0 0 11 28 114 0 51 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 20 24 0 0 11 28 114 0 51 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 39 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 90 xxxx 25 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1545 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 911 xxxx 1051 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1545 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 901 xxxx 1051 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx x>o x xxxx 0.13 xxxx 0.05 xxxx xxxx xxxx I--------------- Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 943 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A * * ` * * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.6 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. 0 • 1 1 MITIG8 - pm Mon Jul 31, 2006 18:59:24 Page 1-1 Future Background Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (PM) Tigard MITCH School Level of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) wwwww+wwwwww++wwwwww+ww+wwwwww+wwww++++wwwwwwww+wwwww+ww++www+++wwwwwwww+*+wwwww Intersection #5 SW 103rd Ave & SW Canterbury Ln wwwwwwwwwww+wwww++wwwww+++www+ww++wwwwww+++++w+www*+www+w++++www+++++wwwwwwww+ww Average Delay (sec/veh): 3.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 10.6] wwww+wwwwwwww+ww+wwww#wwww++w+wwwwwwwwwwwwwww++wwwwww+wwwwwwww+www*wwww++++wwww+ Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Canterbury Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 75 18 0 0 40 130 35 0 30 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 79 19 0 0 42 137 37 0 32 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 79 19 0 0 42 137 37 0 32 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 PHF Volume: 95 23 0 0 51 164 44 0 38 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 95 23 0 0 51 164 44 0 38 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 x xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 215 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 345 xxxx 133 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1355 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 651 xxxx 916 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1355 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 614 xxxx 916 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.07 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.07 xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx xxxx I--------------- Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A " * w w + w + w w w + Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 725 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.4 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 7.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 10.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A w w w w w + B + w w w ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.6 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * + B w w++wwwwwwwwwwwww+wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww+wwwww+w+wwwwww+w+wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww+www Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. • MITIG8 - Mid-PM school PeakMon Jul 31, 2006 19:05:22 Page 1-1 2008 Future Background weekday MId-afternoon School Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Tigard MITCH School Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) wwxxw+++xw++++++++w+xwxx+xx++ww+xxxw+++xxxxxw+w+xx++++xxx+wx++++++wxx+www+wxxww+ Intersection #5 SW 103rd Ave & SW Canterbury Ln wxwwxx+xwwwxxx+wx+++++w++,rxxx+wxwxxwxwww+wwwwxx++ww+w+x++++++wx+ww++x+++,t*+xxwww Average Delay (sec/veh): 5.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.4] xx+xxxw,r*,t+wx+www+wxw+wx:w+x+++++rww+r++++w+www~wwxw+ww+*++++wxw++++++++*+w+rxxxxwx Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Canterbury Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Count Date: 25 Jul 2006 << Mid-afternoon peak Base Vol: 23 14 0 0 11 40 50 0 19 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 24 15 0 0 12 42 53 0 20 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 24 15 0 0 12 42 53 0 20 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 PHF Volume: 29 18 0 0 14 51 63 0 24 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 29 18 0 0 14 51 63 0 24 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 65 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 115 xxxx 39 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1513 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 881 xxxx 1032 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1513 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 868 xxxx 1032 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.07 xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx I--------------- Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x•.,.•.•. xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * w * + * w • w * + + Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 908 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.3 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.4 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A * + * * * * A * w w ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.4 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * A xwxw+++++~.*wxwwwwwwwwxwxxxxwwxww++xxxxx+ww+++++w+xxxwxw++xxxxxxx+++x++wwxxxxw+++ Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. 0 ! MITIG8 - am Mon Jul 31, 2006 18:59:41 Page 1-1 Future Background 2008 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (AM) Tigard MITCH School Level of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 SW 103rd Ave & SW Inez St Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: At 9.71 Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Inez St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 { Volume Module: Count Date: 25 Jul 2006 « Mid-PM Base Vol: 0 100 4 2 30 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 0 105 4 2 32 0 0 0 0 2" 0 2 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 105 4 2 32 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 PHF Volume: 0 121 5 2 36 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 121 5 2 36 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:x..--. xxxx xxxxx 4.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.9 xxxx 6.7 FollowUpTim:x.,.-. xxxx xxxxx 2.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.0 xxxx 3.8 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 126 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 164 xxxx 123 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1396 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 727 xxxx 813 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1396 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 726 xxxx 813 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx 0.00 {1--------------- Level of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx Y 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move : * * * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 767 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx 7.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.7 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * * * * * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxXocx 9.7 ApproachLOS: * * * A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. MITIG8 - pm Mon Jul 31, 2006 18:59:32 Page 1-1 Future Background Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (PM) Tigard MITCH School Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 SW 103rd Ave & SW Inez St Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: A( 9.2] Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Inez St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ---------------f Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 40 4 0 160 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 0 42 4 0 168 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 42 4 0 168 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.65 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 PHF Volume: 0 49 5 0 198 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 49 5 0 198 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx ,,,,,..,x xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 FollowUpTim:,---.x xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x,.-.., xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 I--------------- 1I--------------- 11--------------- Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 250 xxxx 52 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 739 xxxx 1016 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 739 xxxx 1016 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx 0.00 I--------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move : * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 856 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.2 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.2 ApproachLOS: * * * A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. MITIG8 - Mid-PM School PeakMon Jul 31, 2006 19:05:03 Page 1-1 2008 Future Background weekday Mid-afternoon School Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Tigard MITCH School Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) wxxww}xwwwx}}x}w}xwwxxxxx}w}wwwwx}}}xx}xwx+x+xxwwxwxww}}+www+xwxwxwxxx}}xxxxxxxx Intersection 44 SW 103rd Ave & SW Inez St }}wwwww}w}x}xx}w}}x,txxxx}}}wwwx}xwwww+xxwww}xxxxxwwwx}xw}xwxxxx}}}wxxwwww}}}wwww Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.51 wwwww}xww}x}xxxwxwxw}xwxwwwwx}xwx}xxww}x+}+}wx}wwwwwwwwwxx}xxx+}xxxxwwxxxxxxxxxx Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Inez St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Count Date: 25 Jul 2006 << Mid-PM Base Vol: 0 45 8 8 55 0 0 0 0 6 0 7 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 0 47 8 8 58 0 0 0 0 6 0 7 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 47 8 8 58 0 0 0 0 6 0 7 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 PHF Volume: 0 54 10 10 66 0 0 0 0 7 0 8 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 54 10 10 66 0 0 0 0 7 0 8 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:x.-...., xxxx xxxxx 4.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.9 xxxx 6.7 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.0 xxxx 3.8 I--------------- 11--------------- Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 64 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 145 xxxx 59 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1471 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 747 xxxx 887 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1471 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 743 xxxx 887 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx 0.01 I--------------- 11--------------- Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 614 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.5 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * * * * * * A ApproachDel: r•r•^^,x xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.5 ApproachLOS: * * * A ww*wx****xwx}**xxx*xww}wx***wwww*xxww***x}**}}+xx}}w*}****www**ww*+*x**w*}}wwww* Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. 0 2008 Weekday Peak tai Future oon peak Ho d ur To Ntid-a ftern Hour an Traffic Volumes I ent with C)evelopm 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 MITIGB - am Tue Aug 1, 2006 12:24:01 Page 1-1 TF 2008 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (AM) Tigard MITCH School Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 SW 103rd Ave & SW Canterbury Ln Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: B( 10.91 Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Canterbury Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Count Date: 25 Jul 2006 << AM Peak Hour Base Vol: 16 19 0 0 9 22 90 0 40 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 17 20 0 0 9 23 94 0 42 0 0 0 Added Vol: 48 0 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 65 20 0 0 48 23 94 0 42 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 PHF Volume: 78 24 0 0 58 28 114 0 51 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 78 24 0 0 58 28 114 0 51 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.3 xxxx ........x xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 86 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 252 xxxx 72 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1485 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 736 xxxx 990 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1485 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 705 xxxx 990 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.05 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.16 xxxx 0.05 xxxx xxxx xxxx I--------------- Level of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.6 xxxx xxxxx .--,,.x xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx .--,,,x xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx .,..,,,.x xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 774 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx XYXXx xxxx xxxxx 0.8 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 7.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 10.9 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A * * * * * * B ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.9 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. 0 0 MITIG8 - pm Tue Aug 1, 2006 12:24:38 Page 1-1 TF 2008 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (PM) Tigard MITCH School Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 SW 103rd Ave & SW Canterbury Ln Average Delay (sec/veh): 3.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: B( 10.81 Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Canterbury Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume module: Base Vol: 75 18 0 0 40 130 35 0 30 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 79 19 0 0 42 137 37 0 32 0 0 0 Added Vol: 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 86 19 0 0 49 137 37 0 32 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.83 0.63 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 PHF Volume: 103 23 0 0 59 164 44 0 38 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 103 23 0 0 59 164 44 0 38 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 223 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 371 xxxx 141 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1345 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 630 xxxx 907 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1345 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 591 xxxx 907 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.08 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.07 xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx xxxx I--------------- Level of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x........ xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * # Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 704 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.4 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 7.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 10.8 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A * * * * ' # B * * * # ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.8 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. 0 • MITIG8 - Mid-PM School PeakTue Aug 1, 2006 12:25:32 Page 1-1 Total Future 2008 Weekday Mid-afternoon Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Tigard MITCH School Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 SW 103rd Ave & SW Canterbury Ln Average Delay (sec/veh): 5.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.7] Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Canterbury Ln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Count Date: 25 Jul 2006 << mid pm peak Hour Base Vol: 23 14 0 0 11 40 50 0 19 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 24 15 0 0 12 42 53 0 20 0 0 0 Added Vol: 15 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 39 15 0 0 29 42 53 0 20 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 PHF Volume: 47 18 0 0 34 51 63 0 24 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 47 18 0 0 34 51 63 0 24 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 r xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity module; Cnflict Vol: 85 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 172 xxxx 60 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1487 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 818 xxxx 1006 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1487 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 798 xxxx 1006 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.08 xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx I--------------- Level of Service Module: 2way95thQ: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move : A * Movement: IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 846 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.1 xxxx x.---, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 7.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.7 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A * * * * • * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.7 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. • 0 MITIG8 - am Tue Aug 1, 2006 12:24:20 Page 1-1 TF 2008 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (AM) Tigard MITCH School Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 SW 103rd Ave & SW Inez St Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: A( 9.91 Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Inez St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------------l~---------------~ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Count Date: 25 Jul 2006 << Mid-PM Base Vol: 0 100 4 2 30 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 0 105 4 2 32 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 105 4 2 71 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 PHF Volume: 0 121 5 2 81 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 121 5 2 81 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.9 xxxx 6.7 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.0 xxxx 3.8 I--------------- ► Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 126 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 209 123 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1396 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 683 813 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1396 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 682 xxxx 813 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx 0.00 I--------------- Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx )Mxx xxxxK 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 742 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.9 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * * * * * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.9 ApproachLOS: * * * A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. • 0 MITIG8 - pm Tue Aug 1, 2006 12:24:30 Page 1-1 TF 2008 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (PM) Tigard MITCH School Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ++**xx++++++++++xxxxxxxxx+xxx,r++++++++++**+++++++*+++++xxx*++++x*,txxxxxxx+xxxxxx Intersection #4 SW 103rd Ave & SW Inez St +++++++++++++++**++++xxx+++++++xxxx+x+x+xx+x+++x++++++++++++++++*+++++++++++*+++ Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.3) +++++xx++x+x+xxx+xx+x++xx+++++++++++++++++++++++xxxxxx+x+xx+xx*++++x+x++xxxxxx+x Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Inez St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I--------------- ---------------~I---------------I~---------------~ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 40 4 0 160 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 0 42 4 0 168 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 42 4 0 175 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 PHF Volume: 0 49 5 0 206 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 49 5 0 206 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 I--------------- Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 258 xxxx 52 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 731 xxxx 1016 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 731 xxxx 1016 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx 0.00 I--------------- Level of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 850 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.3 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx x xxxxxx 9.3 ApproachLOS: * * * A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. 0 • MITIG8 - Mid-PM School PeakTue Aug 1, 2006 12:25:23 Page 1-1 Total Future 2008 Weekday Mid-afternoon Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Tigard MITCH School Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 SW 103rd Ave & SW Inez St Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.6) Street Name: SW 103rd Ave SW Inez St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Count Date: 25 Jul 2006 << Mid-PM Base Vol: 0 45 8 8 55 0 0 0 0 6 0 7 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 Initial Bse: 0 47 8 8 56 0 0 0 0 6 0 7 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 47 8 8 75 0 0 0 0 6 0 7 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 •0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 PHF Volume: 0 54 10 10 86 0 0 0 0 7 0 8 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 54 10 10 86 0 0 0 0 7 0 8 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx x......., 4.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.9 xxxx 6.7 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.0 xxxx 3.8 I--------------- I1--------------- Capacity module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 64 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 164 xxxx 59 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1471 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 727 xxxx 887 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1471 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 723 xxxx 887 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx 0.01 I---------------f~--------------- 11--------------- Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 803 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.6 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * * * * * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.6 ApproachLOS: * * * A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Tra£fix 7.8.0515 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC.