Loading...
Hearings Officer Packet - 07/07/1997• • CITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER JULY 7,1997 - 7:00 P.M. CITY Of TIGARD Community Development Shaping ,4 Better Community A:::.G.:.:..E N 0a 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC HEARING 2.1 AT & T MONOPOLE TOWER Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97-0004 LOCATION: 13707 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S103DD, Tax Lot 00400. PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval for a 50-foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and associated equipment structures. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial; C-G. ZONING DESIGNATION: General Commercial; C-G. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108 and 18.130. 2.2 AT & T MONOPOLE TOWER Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97-0005 Variance (VAR) 97-0003 LOCATION: 12562 SW Main Street; WCTM 2S102AC, Tax Lot 01101. PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval for a 50-foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and associated equipment structures. The applicant has also requested Variance approval to eliminate the requirement for a paved surface to the proposed communications facility. ZONING DESIGNATION: Central Business District; CBD. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Central Business District; CBD. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.66, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130 and 18.134. 2.3 THE RITE CENTER Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97-0006 LOCATION: 11070 and 11140 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1S135CA, Tax Lots 02500 and 02600. Located in the eastern terminus. of SW Tiedeman Street and SW Geenburg Road. PROPOSAL: A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a 36-bed homeless facility. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density. ZONING DESIGNATION: Residential, 12 Units Per Acre; R-12. 3. OTHER BUSINESS 4. ADJOURNMENT TIGARD HEARING's OFFICER PAGE 2 OF 2 7/7/97 PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA h:\patty\masters\agendho.mst PUBLIC NOTICE: Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Hearings Officer meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the meeting. Please call (503) 639-4171, Ext. 320 (voice) or (503) 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: ? Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and ? Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of Tigard of your need(s) by 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above if you are requesting such services. (OVER FOR HEARING AGENDA ITEM(S) TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER PAGE 1 OF 2 7/7/97 PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA h:\patty\masters\agendho.mst 0 0 I t AGENDA ITEM NO. -?- I CITY OF TIGARD. Community Development Shaping A. Better Community PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL WILL HOLD A SPECIAL MEETING, ON THURSDAY - SEPTEMBER 4, 1997 AT 6:30 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF THE HEARING'S OFFICER APPROVAL OF: FILE NO(S): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 91-0004 FILE TITLE: AT & T MONOPOLE TOWER APPLICANT: AT & T Wireless Services OWNER: Tigard Retail Center Partners 1600 SW Fourth Avenue 1815 NW 169th Place Portland, OR 97201 Beaverton, OR 97006 REPRESENTATIVE: Mike Birndorff, Project Manager W & H Pacific 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97008-7120 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 50-foot tall cellular communications monopole tower and related equipment structure. LOCATION: 13707 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM2S103DD, Tax Lot 00400. ZONE: General Commercial; C-G. The General Commercial zoning district provides sites for the provision of major retail goods and services. The provision of utilities are also allowed in the General Commercial zoning district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120 and 18.130. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY. WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. CUP 97.0004 REVIEW OF THE HEARING'S OFFICER APPROVAL AT & T MONOPOLE TOWER 9/4/97 (6:30 PM)-CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT TEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOEACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEA G. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESS ED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE CITY COUNCIL WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE CITY COUNCIL MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER AUGUST 15, 1997, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE CITY COUNCIL WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO. SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25C) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25C) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY RECORDER OR STAFF PLANNER MARK ROBERTS, AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD., OREGON 97223. T 1 LIU I I ? I CUP 97-0004 REVIEW OF THE HEAHING'S UFFIGEH AYrHUVAL AT & T MONOPOLE TOWER 9/4/97 (6:30 PM) CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 664-0360 Notice TT 8 915 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising *City of Tigard • ? Tearsheet Notice 13125 Sid Hall Blvd. •Tigard,Oregon 97223 • ? Duplicate Affidavit Accounts Payable AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, jss. 1, Kathy S Eder being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of theTJ Bard-'run 1 at-; n T,j_mes a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at T; cra rr3 in the aforesaid county and state; that the a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for rnJF successive and consecutive in the following issues: August 21,1997 Subscribed and swor before me this 2-1st day of August, 19 9 7 OFFICIAL SEAL ROBIN A. BlMOM Not ublic for Oregon NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My Commission Expires: *COMMISSION NO. 062071 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 16, 2001 AFFIDAVIT _ The following w$1 be considered by the Tigard City Council will 60l a special meeting on September 4, 1997, at 6:30 P.M., at the Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. Both public oral and written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal Code, and any rules -and procedures adopted by the. . " Tigard City Council, o. rules of procedure set forth in Chapter 1830. ?J'Failure to -raise an issue in`person .or1 by letter at some point prior to the close of the hearing on the re uest'accom sufficient to allow the Hearings Authority nd al lthetparties to respond on the request, precludes an appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals based on that issue, and failure to specify the criterion from the Community, Development Code. or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is If 'di'rected precludes 'an appeal based on that criterion. Further information is available at City Hall and may be obtained from the Community Develop- ment Director or City Recorder at the same location; or by calling (503) ;. 639-4171.. PUBLIC HEARING CITY, COUNCIL REVIEW OF THE HEARING'S OFFICER APPROVAL OF. p. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 97-0004 ., > A T &.T MONOPOLE TOWER< ??The appcant is requesting approval to: develop a 50 -foot tall cellular 66- nicattons monopole tower and related equipment structure. LOCATION: 13707 SW Pacific. Highway; WCTM 2S103DD, Tax Lot 00400:• ZONE:.General. Coaimercia ;-. C-G.,Thd'General.Comme'rcial, * zontng dtsinct provtdes sites for the:provision zof major 'retail * "and goods- sernc The provision of uhlitres a.. r; so=allowed.in the. General Cornf I TT8915 - Publish August 21,1997. -.- 02,18A 6; :18:100;;'10.102, CITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER CITY OF TIGARD munity .A Better Community SIGN-IN SHEET 13 Sfiaping com NOTICE: ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN THEIR NAME AND RECORD THEIR ADDRESS ON THIS SHEET ................(Please PRINT Legibly/ AGENDA ITEM #: 2.1 DATE OF HEARING: 7/7/97 Page 1 of FILE NAME(S): AT & T MONOPOLE TOWER CASE NUMBER(S): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 97-0004 OWNER(S) Tigard Retail Center Partners APPLICANT(S): AT & T Wireless Services PROJECT LOCATION: 13707 SW Pacific Highway MAP(S) & TAX LOT(S) NO(S). WCTM 2S103DD, TAX LOT 00400. NAME, ADDRESS, AND INCLUDE YOUR ZIP CODE PROPONENT/ (For the proposal) OWN 3 Name: C-a 4 1:?Lc ? A50 0 Name: Pt??" y 1a-uf6?(r Address: L5 1?1? d (/tc•?v?? Address: lc'?2?' Sw P-A-L R_ CUB L-i City: ?i aCZ? State: Zip q7o?i3 Citv State:. Zip' 1 X22- Or- hApattyUnasterslsigninh0.mst OPPONENT (Against the proposal) ---------------------- aAtlltlatloN r _ C, 4MR 't," ? o City: f Ga ?? !State: ? Zip: f n l? City:: ???>< A d State: O P, zip: 01-1 7- Z3 CITY OF TIGARD Community Development ShapingA Better Community CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER c* BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Number(s): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 97-0004 Case Name(s): AT & T MONOPOLE TOWER Name of Owner: Tigard Retail Center Partners Name of Applicant: AT & T Wireless Services. Inc. Address of Applicant: 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue City: Beaverton State: Oregon Zip: 97008 Address of Property: 13707 SW Pacific Highway City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97224 Tax Map & Lot No(s).: WCTM 2S103DD, Tax Lot 00400. Request-? The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 50-foot tall cellular communications monopole tower and related equipment structures. lone: General Commercial; C-G. The General Commercial zoning district provides sites for the provision of major retail goods and services. The provision of utilities are also allowed in the General Commercial zoning district. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial; C-G. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108 and 18.130. ACQQQ: -? ? Approval as Requested 9 Approval with Conditions ? Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: 19 Owners of record within the required distance 0 Affected governmental agencies O The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator [9 The applicant and owner(s) Final Decision: % THE DECISION SHALL BE FIHAL'OH MONDAY AUGUST 18,1997 UNLESS AH APPEAL IS FILED The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard,City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $1,745.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of $500.00. THE DEADIINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 PAIN AUGUST 18,1991. 1@11110SUORS: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. CUP 97-0004 AT & T MONOPOLE TOWER NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARING'S OFFICFER • • BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application for a conditional use permit for a) F I N A L O R D E R 50-foot tall* tower for cellular mobile radio telephone ) antennas and an accessory structure in the C-G zone at ) CUP 97-0004 13707 SW Pacific Highway in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) (AT&T Wireless) 1. SUMMARY 1. The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit for a 50-foot tall tower that will support flush-mounted panel antennas for cellular mobile radiotelephone services and a related 11.5-foot x 16-foot equipment building and associated development. The proposed tower and building will be situated in a roughly 936-square foot leased area (39 feet x 24 feet) beside (southwest of) a commercial building (for Tune-A-Car/Meineke) on the 0.95-acre parcel. The leased area now is paved and allows vehicle maneuvering around the building. The applicant will surround the tower and accessory building with 15 four-foot tall bollards. The applicant does not propose to provide additional landscaping, paving or parking, although the applicant agreed at the hearing to enclose the accessory building with a sight-obscuring fence. Parking for the facility will be provided in an existing parking lot on the site. Access to the facility will be through the existing parking lot. Utilities for the site will be underground. 2. A duly noticed public hearing was held to review the application on July 7, 1997. City staff recommended approval. The applicant accepted the staff recommendation without objections. Six members of the public testified orally and/or in writing against the proposal. The hearings officer held open the public record for a total of three weeks to provide an opportunity for the parties to submit additional testimony and evidence. The principal issues in the case include the following: a. Whether the need for the facility to be situated where it is proposed is relevant under the applicable Tigard Community Development Code regulations or Comprehensive Plan policies, and, if so, whether the applicant met the burden of proof that there is such a need; b. Whether the site size, shape, location and natural features are (or can be made) suitable for the proposed use, particularly given: (i) Potential visual and noise impacts due to the proximity of the proposed facility to property used for single family dwellings; and (ii) Potential safety impacts due to the distance between existing parking spaces on the site and the location of the proposed facility. 3. Based on the findings and conclusions herein, the hearings officer conditionally approves the application. II. BASIC FACTS 1. The parcel that contains the leased area in this case contains 0.95 acres (or 41,382-square feet). The land is relatively flat and does not contain significant natural resources other than trees in landscaped areas of the site. The parcel is developed with three roughly 30-foot tall commercial buildings and associated parking, landscaping and utilities generally consistent with plans approved by the City. Hearings Officer Final Order CUP 97-0004 (AT&T - Hwy 99W) Page 1 a. The westernmost of the three buildings on the site contains Tune-A-Car and Meineke. There are several drive-through bays with overhead doors on the east and west sides of the building. Although the doors facing west are supposed to remain closed during certain times and days pursuant to a conditional use permit, unrebutted public testimony is that those doors generally are left open at all times and days when the businesses operate. West of the building is a 20-foot wide automobile maneuvering aisle that connects to maneuvering aisles to the central parking area on the site. b. The southernmost of the three buildings contains a videotape rental business and a tanning business, among others. There is parking along the north edge of the southerly building and in the large central parking lot on the site. There is a large paved area west of the southerly building for parking and temporary storage of solid waste. c. Based on the survey and site plan provided by the applicant, the two buildings are less than 45 feet apart at their closest point, although the distance between increases to the west. Based on a survey of the site by Olsen Engineering in the application, the proposed leased area is about 15 feet from the rear of the parking spaces abutting the north side of the southerly building. Based on a site plan by the applicant's architect (sheet 1/A2), the proposed leased area is about 25 feet from the rear of those parking spaces. This discrepancy is not resolved by substantial evidence in the record. (The Staff Report did not identify this discrepancy. The hearings officer discovered it after the record closed.) d. The majority of the landscaping on the 0.95-acre parcel is situated in the setback along Pacific Highway, between the northerly building and SW Watkins Avenue (to the north), and in a triangular area at the northwest corner of the parcel. There are landscape islands in the parking lot. There is about a 5-foot wide landscape strip along the west edge of the site. That strip and the adjoining land to the west contains numerous 20- to 40-foot tall conifer and deciduous trees and other vegetation that screen the site from view from the west to the height of the trees. There are light standards in the parking lot. There is not substantial evidence in the record of the height of those light standards. The hearings officer estimates them to be 30 to 35 feet high. e. Although the site plan by the applicant's architect (sheet 1/A2) indicates there are about 105 parking spaces on the 0.95-acre parcel, that site plan is inaccurate in at least two regards. It shows parking spaces where the drive west of the Tune-A- Car/Meineke building extends to the parking lot north of that building. Assuming the site plan is otherwise correct in its illustration of parking on the site, the actual number of parking spaces on the site is about 100. 2. The properties north and west of the parcel on which the tower is proposed are developed with single family detached one-story homes at built-out densities. The tower site is within 50 feet of the back yard of one home to the west and within roughly 125 feet to the house on that lot. It is a little farther from the backyard and home on the adjoining lot to the north. It is several hundred feet or more from other surrounding homes and yards. Based on the photo simulation of the tower (exhibit A of the applicant's July 28, 1997 letter), the upper portion of the tower and antenna will be visible from some but certainly not all vantage points in the vicinity. Visual impacts are greatest on the lot immediately west of the tower site and will decrease proportionately with distance. Whether those visual impacts are significantly adverse is not a basic fact or a question of law, but is a mixed question of law and fact the answer to which mostly depends on the perspective of the person drawing it. Hearings Officer Final Order CUP 97-0004 (AT&T - Hwy 99W) Page 2 3. The issue of the need for the facility to be situated where it is proposed, instead of in some other location on the site or on some other site altogether, was the subject of substantial public testimony and applicant response. The public testimony is summarized in a later finding. Highlights of the applicant's information are summarized below. a. In exhibit A of the April 3, 1997 application in this matter, the applicant's real estate manager states "this location is the only viable site that will meet our engineering needs and requirements." In support, the applicant submitted computer- generated plots illustrating better coverage if the tower is located where proposed versus an existing tower site at 99W and Walnut Street. Also see page 2 of the application. In summary the applicant argued the new site is needed to increase capacity and improve quality (e.g., reduce dropped calls) along the Highway 99W corridor. b. In a letter dated July 14, 1997, the applicant's RF design manager (a professional engineer) argued a tower at the proposed location will improve the signal level and will establish the site as a dominant server in an area that includes about 3/4 of mile of Highway 99W, partially remedying existing coverage and dominance problems. She submitted plots of "actual cellular coverage data gathered during test drives along routes that will be affected by the proposed site" in support of her argument. The plot showing the impact of the new tower is based on a temporary test transmitter operating at the site. c. In a letter dated July 28, 1997, the applicant's consultant argued the proposed site "is part of a long-range plan to improve the level of quality of coverage and to increase the amount of caller capacity in the Tigard area. With the addition of the proposed site, and a future site to be located in the vicinity of the Highway 99 and I-5 interchange, AT&T will have completed its plan for improving cellular service in Tigard for the immediate and foreseeable future." 4. The issue of the noise from air conditioner units in the proposed accessory building was raised by the public and responded to by the applicant. a. In a letter dated July 14, 1997, the applicant testified that two air conditioners will be installed on the east side of the accessory building. They would operate in lead-lag mode; one-at-a time. In the letter dated July 14, the applicant identified the specific air conditioner units to be used and provided noise data from the manufacturer of those units. This data show that the units produce less than 50 dBA measured 50 feet from the unit with certain assumptions about background noise levels. b. In a letter dated July 28, 1997, the applicant offered to install "compact ultra low noise air-conditioning units in response to continued concerns. These units generate noise that is far below accepted thresholds." The applicant included the manufacturer's specifications for such a unit, but did not include noise data evident to the hearings officer. c. The record does not include substantial evidence of ambient noise levels at the site other than the anecdotal testimony from neighbors about high noise levels emanating from the open bay doors of the Tune-A-Car and Meineke businesses. Higher noise levels caused by the automobile businesses would mask the perceived impact of noise from the proposed air conditioner units. 5. Other basic facts about the site, vicinity and proposed use are summarized in finding I.1 above and in Section III of the June 27, 1997 City of Tigard Staff Report to the Hearings Officer (the Staff Report), incorporated herein by reference. Hearings Oyicer Final Order CUP 97-0004 (AT&T - Hwy 99W) Page 3 • E III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS The applicable approval standards are identified in Section IV of the Staff Report together with responsive findings for each. There is no dispute about which approval standards are relevant or whether they were adequately identified. The hearings officer adopts by reference the approval standards cited in Section IV of the Staff Report. IV. HEARING AND RECORD 1. Hearings Officer Larry Epstein (the "hearings officer") received testimony at the public hearing about this application on July 7, 1997. At the conclusion of the hearing and pursuant to a request by a member of the public and the applicant, the hearings officer held open the public record for one week for submission of unlimited new testimony and evidence from all parties, for a second week for submission of new testimony and evidence from all parties in response to the materials submitted the prior week, and for a third week for a final argument by the applicant. The record in this case closed at 5 PM on July 28, 1997. The testimony and evidence are included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and Exhibit C (Written Testimony). These exhibits are filed at the Tigard City Hall. 2. At the hearing, city planner Mark Roberts summarized the Staff Report. 3. Mike Bimdorf and Jeff Penick testified for the applicant. Mr. Birndorf explained that the AT&T wireless communication system is relatively mature and that additional sites fill in where needed to provide capacity. He argued that placing proposed antennas on the existing cell site at Highway 99W and Walnut Street would result in inefficient overlapping coverage. He offered to place a sight-obscuring (slatted chain link) fence around the ground-mounted equipment on the site. Mr. Penick testified that one additional tower may be needed in Tigard --- near the intersection of Highway 99W and Interstate 5, and that higher towers would not remedy the capacity problem AT&T believes exists with its existing system. 4. Carl Johnson, John Chamberlain, Kaye Chung, David and Vicki Hammes and Preston Vielbig testified orally at the hearing against the proposed conditional use permit. a. Mr. Johnson questioned potential health effects. The hearings officer responded that the City cannot regulate RF emissions that comply with standards adopted by the Federal Communications Commission pursuant to the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, and that the proposed facility is likely to produce a small fraction of the RF energy permitted by FCC standards, based on the hearings officer's experience. b. The remaining witnesses' testimony was similar. None perceive a problem with AT&T service coverage or quality based on their experiences. All argued against a tower so near a single family home, principally because of visual impacts, but there also were concerns about noise from air conditioning units in the accessory building, radio frequency interference and the potential for the tower to pose an "attractive nuisance" Several witnesses suggested alternative locations on the site, (e.g., the grassy area at the northwest corner of the site, the Highway 99W frontage of the site or in the parking lot on the site). Several suggested other locations off-site (see, e.g., the list in the July 21, 1997 letter from John and Debra Chamberlain). Two witnesses submitted photographs of the site, surrounding area and other wireless communications facilities, on several of which they illustrated what they believed the tower would look like from several vantage points. Hearings Officer Final Order CUP 97-0004 (AT&T - Hwy 99W) Page 4 • • 5. Mr. Bimdorf responded to the public testimony. He argued the applicant has minimized the visual impact by using a slim-line monopole the minimum height necessary to provide the requisite coverage and flush-mounted panel antenna design and agreeing to install a sight-obscuring fence around the ground-mounted equipment. He argued that many utility poles along Highway 99W and elsewhere in the area are similar in appearance to the proposed tower and have many more obtrusive attachments and connections. He offered to provide more information about the need for the site if the record is held open for that purpose. He explained the site will not have a back-up generator. Batteries will be used for a back-up power supply. He explained about the proposed air conditioners and offered to provide more information about them. He testified that the tower cannot be placed on a landscaped area of the site, because that would violate landscape requirements. He described security measures the applicant will take to prevent public access to the tower, including the fence and anti-climbing measures. He described the steps the applicant took to respond to concerns voiced at public meetings about the proposal, including "flipping" the building and pole locations in the leased area, thereby moving the pole further away and orienting the air conditioners to the east. V. EVALUATION OF REQUEST 1. City staff recommended approval of the conditional use permit based on the findings in Section IV of the Staff Report. The hearings officer adopts and incorporates those findings as his own except as otherwise expressly provided herein. 2. The proposed wireless communications facility is a conditional use in the C-G zone. Therefore it must comply with CDC 18.130.040.1 3. There is a dispute about whether the proposed wireless communications facility is needed at this site. Area residents say there is no need, because they do not experience service problems with the applicant's cellular phone system. The applicant says there is a need, based on dropped calls and inefficient call management. The hearings officer finds it is irrelevant under the CDC whether there is a need for the proposed facility per se. That is, need is not relevant under CDC 18.130.140 for this or any other conditional use. I CDC 18.130.040 provides as follows in relevant part: A. The hearings officer shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a conditional use or to enlarge or alter a conditional use based on findings of fact with respect to each of the following criteria: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography and natural features; 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter; 5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 8.114, Signs, and Section 18.120.180, Approval Standards, if applicable, are met; and 6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the comprehensive plan. Hearings Officer Final Order CUP 97-0004 (AT&T - Hwy 99W) Page 5 • • 4. There is a dispute about whether the location of the proposed wireless communications facility is suitable. The hearings officer finds that the location of the proposed facility near property developed with single family detached dwellings makes this site less suitable than sites farther from such uses, because of perceived aesthetic conflicts between a wireless communications facility and residential uses in general and single family detached homes in particular. That is, to the extent the tower creates a significant adverse visual impact due to its height and character, it conflicts with nearby residential uses with a view of the tower. Unfortunately the CDC provides little guidance about how much impact is enough to render a site unsuitable enough to deny an application. a. The hearings officer construes CDC 18.130.140 such that alternative locations for the use are not relevant. The relevant question under the code is not whether the proposed use would have fewer impacts if located on another site. The relevant question is whether the proposed site is suitable. There are no doubt sites where the tower would not be as obtrusive. There are no doubt "stealth" antenna designs that would reduce visual impacts. However the potential for fewer impacts if the proposed use is located elsewhere or is redesigned is not relevant. The relevant question is whether this proposal should be approved based on its merits, not whether some other proposal would be. b. If the accessory building is enclosed in a sight-obscuring fence as proposed at the hearing by the applicant, the hearings officer finds it does not have a significant adverse visual impact. The building generally is obscured from view from homes and yards to the west by the existing mature vegetation along the west edge of the site. To the extent it is visible, it is not obtrusive. It will be built of materials common in the area. Its small scale and height minimize its potential visual impact. c. Although it is a close call, the hearings officer finds the proposed tower does not have such significant unmitigated adverse visual impacts that the application should be denied. The tower is the minimum height and cross section necessary to provide the service the applicant intends to provide, and it uses antennas that create the least visual impact at the top of the tower. Although visible from off-site, particularly from the adjoining lot, the visual impacts created by the tower are not so different from the impact of other poles, light standards, signs and structures in the area to render its impact significantly adverse. The homes to the west already are subject to visual impacts from the commercial uses on the site and from overhead utility lines and poles. The proposed tower does not significantly increase those impacts. However, increasing the height of the facility (e.g., for a future collocated antenna) should be prohibited so that visual impacts do not increase. A condition of approval is warranted to this effect. 5. There is an inconsistency in the record about the distance between the facility and the parking spaces to the southwest. If there is at least 25 feet between the parking spaces and the facility, then cars can maneuver into and out of those spaces safely. If there is less than 25 feet, then there is not enough room for the parking spaces and the facility, and the conditional use permit should be denied pursuant to CDC 18.130.140(A)(2). The distance between the parking spaces and the facility can be confirmed before approval of a site plan for the facility. A condition of approval is warranted to require such verification. 6. Pursuant to CDC 18.130.040, a conditional use must comply with CDC 18.120.180 (Site Development Review approval standards). a. Based on CDC 18.120.180(A)(4), the hearings officer finds that the tower should not incorporate any advertising or signage and should not be lighted except as required by the Federal Communications Commission or other applicable agency or as Hearings Officer Final Order CUP 97-0004 (AT&T - Hwy 99W) Page 6 • • approved by the planning director for security or safety purposes. Conditions of approval are warranted to this effect. b. CDC 18.120.140(A)(4)(a) and (b) require buffering between different types of land uses and CDC 18.120.140(A)(5)(d) requires that a use that creates noise, light or glare be buffered from adjoining residential uses. The purposes of the buffer in this case are to screen the tower from view and to mitigate noise impacts. The existing vegetation on the west edge of the site buffers the site from view to an extent. The accessory building and bottom half of the tower will be largely hidden from view from the west. Only the top 20 to 30 feet of the tower will be visible from the west. That visual impact cannot be mitigated practicably. Therefore the hearings officer finds the proposed buffer complies with CDC 18.120.140(A)(4). c. Increasing the landscaped buffer and/or increasing the distance between the facility and the residential properties to the west would increase the efficacy of the buffer and would reduce the perceived adverse visual impact of the tower from the west. But the hearings officer construes CDC 18.120.140(A)(4) to not require relocation of the tower farther away from residential uses or increased landscaping on the site. 7. Pursuant to CDC 18.130.040, a conditional use must comply with the applicable policies of the comprehensive plan. The policies most relevant to this proposal are the locational criteria for commercial land uses, particularly general commercial.2. a. The hearings officer finds that the proposed wireless communications facility is of a scale that is compatible with surrounding uses. The tower is taller than surrounding structures. But its cross section is much smaller than structures on surrounding properties. The net impact is the same as or less than other structures in the area, particularly due to the largely passive nature of the wireless communications facility. b. The hearings officer finds that the proposed wireless communications facility is such that the privacy of adjacent homes can be maintained, because the facility is not manned and does not provide access to the general public to viewpoints or vistas that do not already exist. 8. The hearings officer finds a communications tower has inherently adverse visual impacts that are unavoidable. If the facility is abandoned or its use is otherwise terminated, the adverse visual impacts of the facility can be eliminated by removing the tower. The hearings officer finds the applicant should be required to remove the tower if all antennas are removed from the tower or are not operated for at least six months. The tower shall be removed within 90 days of abandonment. VI. CONCLUSION AND DECISION 1. Based on the findings adopted and incorporated herein, the hearings officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit complies with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code, subject to applicable laws and conditions of approval warranted to address the potential impacts of the conditional use. 2 Those locational criteria provide as follows in relevant part: (4)(a) The scale of the project shall be compatible with the surrounding uses. (4)(b) The site configuration and characteristics shall be such that the privacy of adjacent non-commercial uses can be maintained. Hearings Officer Final Order CUP 97-0004 (AT&T - Hwy 99W) Page 7 • • 2. In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and other reports of affected public agencies and testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the hearings officer hereby approves CUP 97-0004, subject to the following conditions: a. Before the city issues a building permit for the proposed tower, the applicant shall submit a site plan to the planning director for review and approval. (1) The site plan shall identify where one (1) off-street parking space will be provided for the communications facility. That space may be situated in the existing parking lot if the applicant shows that the number of parking spaces on the site exceeds the minimum number required by the CDC by at least one space. (2) The site plan shall show a sight-obscuring fence on at least the west, south and east elevations of the ground-mounted equipment on the communications facility site. The applicant shall maintain the approved screening in good condition as long as the applicant uses the site for a communications facility. (3) If lighting is proposed for security or safety purposes, the site plan shall show all such lighting, subject to condition of approval b. (4) The applicant shall show there is at least 25 feet between the facility and the closest point of the parking spaces that abut the north side of the southernmost building on the site. b. The tower shall not incorporate any advertising, signage, or lighting except as required by the Federal Communications Commission or other applicable agency with jurisdiction; provided, the planning director may approve lighting deemed necessary for security and safety purposes; provided further, permitted lighting shall be designed, situated and/or operated to minimize its off-site impacts. c. The applicant shall allow antennas for other telecommunications service providers to be situated on the proposed tower, provided it does not increase the height of the tower or substantially increase adverse visual impacts, and shall allow associated transmission equipment to be situated in the proposed accessory building on the site if the tower and/or building can accommodate such additional antennas and equipment or can be modified to do so; provided, the applicant may require such shared user to pay all costs associated with such shared use as a condition of such shared use; provided further, such modification to the conditional use should be subject to applicable review by the city. The applicant shall respond promptly and in good faith to any inquiry regarding shared use of the tower site. d. The applicant shall remove the tower within 90 days after the communications facility is abandoned or its use is otherwise terminated. The facility is presumed to be abandoned if all of the antennas are removed from the tower or are not operated for at least six consecutive months. ATF,f7/this 4th daygf-ASrgust, 1997. Larry Eps m, City of Tig H . gs Officer Hearings Ogcer Final Order CUP 97-0004 (AT&T - Hwy 99W) Page 8 0 0 "EXHIBIT A" -- PARTIES OF RECORD (Written Public Testimony received at the hearing) : I PACIFIC 8405 S.W. Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97008-7120 7/28/97 RECEIVED PLANNING Larry Epstein J U L 2 9 1997 Tigard Hearings Officer 13125 SW Hall Blvd., CITYCFTIGARD Tigard, OR. 97223 RE: CUP 97-0004 (AT&T Monopole) Dear Mr. Epstein, Please accept the following in response to letters received from John and Debra Chamberlain and David and Vicke Hammes questioning the need for the proposed cellular facility and discussing noise and visual issues. NEED FOR FACILITY: As documented in the previously submitted analysis from AT&T's senior radio frequency engineer, the proposed cellular facility at 13707 SW Pacific Highway is necessary to provide ongoing high quality cellular service in the area. The service standards set by AT&T reflect directly upon the quality of the system and the degree of customer satisfaction. AT&T sets high standards in these areas and is committed to maintaining those standards to ensure superior call clarity, a very low percentage of one-way calls, a low number of dropped calls, and a low number of callers who are denied service. The proposed site is part of a long-range plan to improve the level of quality of coverage and to increase the amount of caller capacity in the Tigard area. With the addition of the proposed site, and a future site to be located in the vicinity of the Highway 99 and I-5 interchange, AT&T will have completed its plan for improving cellular service in Tigard for the immediate and foreseeable future. There are no plans to place new cellular facilities every mile or mile and a half throughout the City. The location of cellular facilities is not based on a fixed distance of separation between sites or grid pattern placed over the landscape. Rather, the identification of the location and need for cellular facilities is a complicated process that is based on such factors as surrounding topography, the presence of natural and man made features, and current and projected usage patterns. For example, the increasing use of cellular phones within buildings has dictated the need to improve and increase signal strength to allow for "in-building" signal penetration. VISUAL ISSUES: In response in concerns raised that photographs of the existing monopole on North Dakota Street do not accurately represent the appearance of the proposed facility, we have provided a photo simulation and photographs taken from Fairhaven Way (Exhibit A). The attached photo simulation is based on (503) 626-0455 Fax (503) 526-0775 Planning • Engineering • Surveying 9 Landscape Architecture 9 0 a photograph taken from Fairhaven Way looking south east toward the proposed site. The house shown in the photograph is the nearest residence to the site. As the photo simulation demonstrates, the proposed fifty foot tall "slim-line" monopole is not a massive structure that dominates the landscape. Rather, it is similar in height and appearance to many parking lot light standards. The second photograph was taken near the intersection of Fairhaven Way and Fairhaven Street looking south east toward the proposed site. The third photograph was taken along Fairhaven Way near the first angle looking north east toward the proposed site. As these photographs illustrate, a grove of trees and shrubs obscures the view of the proposed facility from these perspectives. NOISE* As previously indicated, noise generated from the proposed air-conditioning units are not significant. Given ambient noise levels in the area, it is not likely that the units would even be audible at most times. Nevertheless, AT&T will agree to install compact ultra low noise air-conditioning units (Exhibit B) in response to continued concerns. These units generate noise that is far below accepted thresholds. If you have any questions regarding the proposed cellular facility, please feel free to contact me at 626-0455. Sincerely, W&H Pacific Michael Birndorf EXHIBIT A 0 i r ?? 07,°24/97 THU EXHIBIT B The 38AN/BK series condensing unit combines smaller size. reduced weight and enhanced performance with state of the art styling. The 38HDC/QR series is a robust commercial grade condensing unit designed to be reliable, quiet and extremely efficient. The 38HDC/QR incorporates many features that are extra or unavailable in many other condensing units. This exclusive Carrier design offers maximum value and flexibility. 46 The 38AN/BK are cooling & The 38QR is a heat pump heat pump units operating ranging from 18,000 to at 9,000 to 12,000 Btuh, 60,000 Btuh, Matched with: Matched with: 40QNB/E009 40QKE024-048 40QNB/E012 40QAE024-060 40QNE018,024 match with 38BKO18 &024 (this CDU is a 38QR configured for High Wall setup) 38HDS MULTI-S PLIT SYSTEM These systems operate with combination of 40QNB, 40QKB, 40QAB fan coils. The 38HDS also permits standard ducted fan coil operation in conjunction with duct free. For more information, contact your local Carrier Representative. The 38HDC is a cooling-only unit with capacities ranging from 18,000 to 60,000 Btuh. Matched with: 40QKBO24-036 40QABO24-060 40QNBO18 - 024 • 12 SUR with matched systems • Scroll Compressors • Ws in outdoor unit • Nigh & Low pressure switches • Standard low Ambient • 6.8 - 7.2 8e1i-- Compressed cabinet design Q002 <c- The 38HDS Multi-Split serves 2,3 or 4 zones allowing for over 40 possible indoor fan coil combinations. Cooling capacaties range from 24,000 to 48,000 BTU's 07/24/97 THU 15:22 FAX 503 306 7486 SPECIFICATIONS' ATT WIRELESS C Cij 003 MODEL CAPACITY (Btu/h) POWER SUPPLY INDOOR (el OUTD OOR (in) REFRIGERANT TU81NG WEIGHT (Ibs) INDOOR OUTDOOR COOLING HEATING SEER NSPT INDOOR OUTDOOR MAX VERT MAX TUB RING OD (in) CFM W 0 N W D H UFT lh)- LGTH (h) LIQUID GAS INDOOR OUTDOOR COOLING ONLY HIGH WALL (53ON8 • SYSTEM) 400118009-1 36AU09-1 8,500 10 5 115 1 60 115 1 40ONB012-3 38AN-012-3 11,800 . 11 0 - . 200/230 1 60 . .60 108 240 33.46 6.29 11.02 26.1 8.9 23.25 30 35 1/4 1/2 18.7 SS 40ONS019 -3 3BUDCOIS-3 17,300 . 11 3 . . 208/230 I 80 /23xISD 108 2 160 33.61 7.18 11.81 26.1 8.9 23.25 30 35 1/4 1/2 24.2 62 400HOO24-3 38HD(024-3 11 600 . 12 0 - - - 708 230 1 60 / 3x160 550 45.28 8.66 14.11 36.94 1456 25.12 150 200 3A 5/8 38,5 148 , . / - . 208/23Q1-60 570 45.28 8.66 14.17 36.94 14.56 25.12 150 200 8 5/8 41 9 1 . 60 UNDER CEILING (530AB • SYSTEMI 400AB02411-3 380018-3 18,000 12 0 60 208/23x1 208 23x1 40OA802/N-3 38ND(024-3 22 800 . 12 0 . 208/23x1 60 / .60 500 SO.94 23.12 9.94 36.94 14.56 25.13 150 200 3/8 5/8 108 150 40OA8036N-3 38HDC030-3 , 000 30 , 11 D 208/230 180 108/23x1-00 108 600 50.94 23.12 9.94 36.44 1456 25.13 150 200 3/8 5/8 106 154 400AB036N-3 38ND(036-3 , 34,000 . 12 0 . 108/23x160 /23a1d0 208 840 58.81 13.12 9.94 36.44 14.56 25.13 ISO 200 3/8 3/4 117 169 . /230-1-60 840 58.81 23.12 9.44 36.94 1456 25.13 ISO 200 3/8 7/8 117 179 400803611-3 30110(036-5/6 34,000 12.0 208/230.1-60 2084 }? 840 58.81 23.11 9.94 36.94 14.S6 25.13 150 200 3/8 718 117 179 400ABB481-3 38HD(048-3 47 000 12 0 208/230150 208 , . /230-1-00 1200 1156 23.12 9.94 44.S6 17.06 37.19 150 200 3/8 7/8 149 270 400AB04ON-3 38110048-5/6 47,000 12.0 208/230.1.60 208/23CLI-60 or 460160 1200 71.56 23.12 9.94 44.56 11.06 37.19 150 100 3/8 1/0 149 270 400A8060N-3 311111)(060-3 58,00 12 0 108/23x1 60 230 208 . . / 1.60 1600 92,00 13.11 q.94 41.56 17.06 37.19 150 200 3/8 11/8 179 790 4001106011-3 38NDC060-5/6 S8,000 11.0 208/230.)60 20030.3.60 or 460.3.60 1600 9200 23.11 9.94 44.56 11.06 37.19 150 200 3/8 1-1/8 179 190 CASSETTE (S3QKB - SYSTEM) 40 KB -3 38HD(018-3 18,300 11 0 208/230 3 60 208 O36 40QKB036 -3 38HD(024-J 24 000 . 13 0 . . 1118 2301 60 /230.160 20 51f 1600 16.00 11.75 36.99 11.56 2S.13 150 200 3/8 5/8 61.6 150 40OK8036-3 38NDC030-3 , 30.000 . 10 8 - / . 108/230.1 60 8/23x1.60 208 230.1 60 91S 49.62 26.00 11.75 36.94 1456 25.13 1S0 M 3/e S/8 105.8 154 400K8036-3 38HD[036-3 33,000 . 10 8 . 208/230 1 60 / . 108 23x1 915 49.62 26.00 11.75 36.94 14.56 25.13 150 100 3/8 3/4 105.8 169 400BK036-3 38HD(036-5 33 000 . 10 8 . . 208 / .60 915 49.62 26.00 11.75 36.94 14.56 25.13 150 200 3A 7/8 105.8 179 40OKED36-3 38HD(036-6 , 33,000 . 10 8 /13416D 208/23x1 60 208/230-}6D 915 19.62 16.00 11.15 36.94 14.56 25.13 ISO 200 3/8 1/B 105.8 159 . . 460-3-60 915 49.62 26.00 11.15 36.94 14.56 25.13 150 200 3/8 1/8 IOS.g 179 ntAT PUMP HIGH WALL MORE • SYSTEM) 400HEOP-1 3811K-009-1 8,700 400NIO12-3 38gK-011-3 12,500 400NE018-3 380K-018-3 17,300 IOONE011-3 3B8K-024-3 23700 9,ODO 12,500 16900 21,400 10.0 10.5 110 6.8 6.8 8 6.8 115-1.60 208/2301.60 08/23x160 208/230.1 115.1.60 108/23x160 .60 208/23x1.60 240 260 530 SIO 3146 36.63 4518 4S.28 6.29 7.28 0.66 8.66 11.02 26.1 11.81 26.1 14.11 36.94 14.17 36.94 8.9 8.9 14.56 14.56 23.15 23,25 25.12 25.12 30 30 150 15D 35 35 100 200 M 601 66.5 154 161 UNDER CENING (S30AE . SYSTEM) 400AE0240-3 400AE024111-3 3801.018(-3• 3801-024C-3 19,000 24,000 17,000 21.600 11.0 11.0 7.2 7.3 208/230-1.60 708/230.1.60 208/230-1.6D 208/23x1.60 S00 525 50.94 50 94 23.12 73 12 9.94 36.94 14.56 25.13 ISO 200 3/8 5/8 110 154 400AE03614-3 3800-030(-3 30,000 78 000 11 0 1 4 208/230 1 60 208 1 . . 9.94 36.94 14.56 25.13 150 200 3/8 5/8 III 167 400AE03611-3 3808.036(-3 34.600 , 33 000 . 113 . 7 7 . . 208/230 1.60 / 30.1-00 700 23 870 58.81 23.12 9.94 36.94 14.56 75.13 150 200 3/8 3/4 119 180 . . / 0.1.60 870 58.81 23.11 9.94 36.94 1456 15.13 ISO 200 3/8 1 8 400AF036N-3 3BOR 0361 5 6 208 13x360 0 / 119 164 400AF048N-3 - / - 38OR-048(-3 36,000 46,0DO 34,400 4S 500 11.0 10 2 6.8 7 108/130. 1-60 208/23x16 / 46x3.60 810 58.81 23.12 9.94 36.94 11.06 37.19 ISO 100 3/8 3/4 119 149 40QAE0491-3 3BOR 04OC 5 , ± . 0 •108/730-1.60 08 2 230 3 3 1100 7156 2312 9.94 4456 1706 19 150 200 3/8 7/8 151 252 00bE060N-3 - - /6 38AR•060C-3 46,000 58 OOD 45,500 37 500 1 0 1 4 200/7301.69 of 4a. / .6.60 m 46x- 3-60 1100 71.56 23.12 9.94 44.56 11.06 31:19 ISO 100 3/8 7/8 151 752 400AE06ON-3 3BON 06OC 6 5 , , . . 208/130.1-60 208/230.160 208 13 1600 92.00 23.12 9.94 44.56 17.06 31.19 ISO 200 3/8 11/8 181 172 - - / 58.000 57,500 11.0 7.4 200/730.1.60 / 0.3-00 or 460-360 1? 07,00 23.12 9.94 44.56 11.06 37.19 ISO 100 3/8 I•I/8 Igl 112 raawns • angml 40OKED24-3 3800.018(-3 )8000 I 7,600 10.0 6.8 208/230./60 208/23x1-60 52S 7 40DKE036-3 38QR414(-3 25,000 23,BOD 10.7 7.6 208/170.160 208/13x160 980 q 40DKE036-3 380R•D3D(-3 24,000 17,000 II.S 7.6 108/230.1-60 208/230-ISO 980 1 400KE048-3 3800-036(-3 33.000 33,000 A 10.5 6.8 208/230.1.60 108/23x1.60 1100 4 40OKE048-3 38DR-036(- S 34,400 34,000 10.0 6.6 208/230.1-60 208/230.160 1100 4 400KF048-3 3800-036(-6 34,400 34,000 10.0 6.8 208/230.1.60 46D.3-60 1100 4 4 Maximum height difference de 6.00 9.61 26.00 16.00 11.75 11.75 36.94 36.94 14.56 14,56 25.13 25.13 ISO 150 200 200 3/8 3/8 5/8 5/8 66.1 109.6 154 167 9.62 9.61 26.00 26.00 11.75 11.75 36.94 36.94 14.56 1456 15.13 25.13 150 150 200 200 3/8 3/8 3/4 7/8 109.6 118.8 190 184 9.62 9.62 26.00 26.00 11.15 11.75 36.94 36.94 17.11 Il.ll 31.)9 J1.19 ISO 150 100 200 3/8 3/8 3/4 3/4 118.8 118.8 249 249 wends on configuration. Refer to service & Installation instructions. r' 151 For more information contact your nearest C40 Carrier Representative, or call 1-800-CARRIER. Specifications subject to change without notice Or visit out website at http:llwww.carrier.com C 1996 Carrier Corporation, Syracuse. NY Printed in U.S.A. 01/97 R5?_MA Monday, July 21, 1997 David and Vicke Hammes 10740 SW Fairhaven Way Tigard, OR 97223 Mr. Larry Epstein Hearings Officer 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: AT&T Monopole (CUP 97-0004) Dear Mr. Epstein, This letter is in response to information provided by W&H Pacific and AT&T pursuant to public hearing on July 7 at City Ball. Need for Facility: Per the attached supplied drawing it appears this tower is needed to cover the Bull Mountain, McDonald and 99W intersection. With another proposed site being down on Main Street and 99W it appears these poles are needed approximately every mile up the highway. As stated in the meeting several of us who have cellular phones are not experiencing the trouble with our telephones as AT&T stated we were having. We question the real need for this tower with the tower being installed at 99 and Main Street. With this documentation it appears AT&T will require a tower every mile, to mile-1/2 radius to cover the area they want to. Again, this appears to be a band-aid affect to take came of what AT&T says is a problem for today. How many more towers are we going see in the area over the next five years? As you asked AT&T in the meeting, and they admitted they do not have a long range plan, and it appears they still do not have a long range plan. Nolse: Per the supplied data it appears this unit should not bother us, but as stated in the meeting we were told by W&H Pacific when the area was originally improved we were promised and guaranteed we would not hear noise alter business hours and on Sunday. Presently neither of these conditions have been met. The noise problem continues and with the addition of the cellular tower it will only compound the existing noise problems we are experiencing. We have complained to the police about the noise and will continue to do so. VAsual: The tower located on Scholls Ferry and North Dakota is butting up against apadments and not residential homes as so stated. The horses are on the other side of North Dakota and approximately 300 feet away from the tower. I spoke to a resident in the residential area who was unhappy with the present tower that he can see from his backyard, but he was to far away to raise any issues. The pr+d tower by that AT&T wants to install is less theta 50 feet and bordering residential property. As stated in the meeting the proposed site at 99W and Main Street does not have any opposition but it is bordered by apartments and commercial property only and not residential. People buy horses to stay in therm. People in t ? apartments stay for a short length of time. If they do not like their soundings they amp and leave. Please consider denying this application, and let AT&T find another location on 99W that is commercial and not bordered with residential homes 50-95 feet away. (like the proposed 99W and Main Street). John & Debra Chamberlain 10710 SW Fairhaven Way Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-9871 July 21, 1997 Mr. Larry Epstein Hearings Officer 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: AT&T Monopole (CUP 97-0004) Dear Mr. Epstein, • While we were unable to attend the neighborhood meeting in June regarding the AT&T monopole, we were in attendance at the July 7, 1997 public hearing which addressed that proposal. We have also received a copy of Michael Birndorf s letter (with attachments) dated July 14, 1997 in which he responded to three potential problems noted during the public hearing. We certainly appreciate having been informed of this proposal and recognize your difficult role as a mediator. However, we are dissatisfied with the seeming lack of concern, on the part of AT&T, for the neighbors who would be affected by the installation of this monopole. • NEED FOR FACILITY While Carol Friz's letter documents AT&T's need for another server to eliminate their area of weak coverage, it does not prove or demonstrate that this server must be placed at this precise location to remedy their current coverage problem. We would like to see alternative proposal sites and have undeniable proof that those locations are unacceptable. We suggest the following as alternative sites: - Grange Hall/Odd Fellows Hall directly across Hwy 99 - John L. Scott building lot - lot at Park and Hwy 99 (former Hot `N Now and Taco Bell) - Neilsen's Tire Center LARRY EPSTEIN July 21, 1997 Page 2 - Baptist Church on Gaarde at 110th - Canterbury Square - Elmer's Pancake House - Public Storage/God Fathers Pizza site - Tigard Market P1aceBiMart - Boston Market If a church or another non-profit organization were to lease a portion of their property to AT&T for the monopole, compensation, it seems, would benefit a worthy cause. • NOISE In regard to Mr. Birndorf s response to noise generation, the sound data from Crispaire does not confirm that the units will not generate significant amounts of noise. The fourth paragraph on page three of the Crispaire material states "Actual values [of noise levels] may vary with each situation." In effect, the monopole placed 50 feet from our backyard fence would generate 50 dBA's. That is where our three children (ages seven, four and two years old) play. Secondly, paragraph two on page three of the Crispaire documentation states "The Tabulated Data has not been corrected with respect to background noise." Tune-A-Car, the tenant located closest to the proposed site, produces an extraordinary amount of noise from approximately 8:00 AM until closing, and sometimes until as late as 11:00 PM. Our family and neighbors listen to revving motors, honking, very loud telephones, automotive tools, and occasionally obnoxious yelling and profanity. It seems to me that these noises, as well the constant highway traffic, constitute significant "background noise" and should be considered when measuring the sound level of the HVAC units. • VISUAL ISSUES Mr. Birndorf indicates that "visual impacts are not substantial." He based that conclusion on the photographs attached to his letter. The photographs do not clearly represent the visual interference that this monopole causes. They actually minimize the visual reality of this piece of equipment. In addition, Mr. Birndorf implies that the residential zoning district referred to is similar to ours. This is simply not true. The referenced site abuts an apartment complex. Our neighborhood is comprised of approximately 95% home owners in single family dwellings. Not only was Mr. Birndorf s statement purely subjective, it was offensive. By stating that LARRY EPSTEIN July 21, 1997 Page 3 "visual impacts are not substantial," he devalued our opinion and concerns. We feel that this monopole would be an irritating intrusion in our lives, that it would be unsightly on a daily basis, and we would like to be heard. Another issue about which we are concerned is in regard to the possible additions to the pole by AT&T. We were told that once the lease was signed, AT&T could alter the pole at a future date to adjust to changes in technology. This could mean anything, and that disturbs us. Please address this issue further. As we indicated early in our letter, we feel that AT&T is indifferent to potential problems arising as a result of the monopole's placement. At the public hearing on July 7, the AT&T representatives mentioned that any problems with television, cordless phone or remote control receptions were possible. However, they confirmed that AT&T would not take responsibility for a reception problem that could occur in the neighborhood. The residents were told that the FCC would be their only recourse. We find that this indifferent attitude is indicative of power over the people. We were invited to the public hearing, but we don't believe we were heard, nor do we believe that our sincere concerns matter to AT&T. We respectfully submit this letter thoughtfully consider our request to monopole. Thank you. z i?? Chamberlain of personal concern to you. We ask that you deny AT&T the use of this site for their new c: James Nicoli, Mayor of Tigard CJ PACIFIC 8405 S.W. Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97008-7120 July 14, 1997 Mr. Larry Epstein Hearings Officer 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR. 97223 RE: AT&T Monopole (CUP 97-0004) Dear Mr. Epstein, • Please accept the following letter and attachments in response to issues raised at the public hearing on July 7th: NEED FOR FACILITY: Documentation from AT&T's senior RF Engineering Design Manager is attached, which demonstrates the need for the facility at the proposed location. NOISE: Regarding the issue of noise generation, the equipment shelter will be equipped with two "residential" style HVAC units. These units operate in lead-lag mode, meaning a maximum of one unit can be in operation at any given time. I have attached sound data from the manufacturer of the units, which confirms that the units will not generate significant amounts of noise (approximately 50 dBA's at a distance of 50 feet). The HVAC model that will be used is the AVP24ACA by Crispaire. The proposed location of the HVAC units is fifty feet from the residential property line-boundary to the west and a considerably greater distance from the nearest residential dwelling. Please note that the noise data was taken directly in line with the front of an HVAC unit without noise- dampening obstructions. The proposed location of the HVAC units at the Highway 99 site are buffered by the proposed equipment building, the existing commercial building, and the existing landscaped buffer along the property line. Based on this, noise levels to the west and north of the facility can be expected to be even less than those identified by the manufacturer. VISUAL ISSUES: As described at the public hearing, AT&T is proposing a "slim-line" monopole and antenna configuration to address community concerns regarding visual impacts. I have attached photographs of a similar AT&T installation in Tigard that abuts a residential zoning district. As the photographs demonstrate, visual impacts are not substantial. If you have any questions regarding the proposed cellular facility, please feel free to contact me at 626-0455. Sincerely, W&H Pacific r Michael Birndorf Project Planner (503) 626-0455 Fax (503) 526-0775 Planning - Engineering - Surveying - Landscape Architecture - Environmental Services • • ---- AUT July 14, 1997 Mr. Larry Epstein Hearings Officer 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard OR 97223 Re: McDonald & 99W Proposed Cellular Site Dear Mr. Epstein: AT&T Wireless Services 1600 SW Fourth Ave. Portland, OR 97201 The following engineering data is provided in support of the application for the above proposed cellular site. Attached are two plots of actual cellular coverage data gathered during test drives along routes that will be affected by the proposed site. The first plot shows the level of coverage provided by the existing serving cell sites in the area. On this plot, each different character or letter represents a different "dominant server" or cell site sector which is strongest in a given area. The color of the characters indicates the signal strengths: red and green representing strong coverage, brown representing the minimum desired coverage to achieve reliable voice quality and smooth hand-offs between cell sites, and blue representing areas which need improvement. Looking at the plot of current servers (cell sites), one can see that in the immediate vicinity of the proposed cell site there are currently five possible servers vying for dominance. This is not a good situation. Ideally, one would want a cellular user traveling along the highway to pass from one area of strong coverage to the next area without passing through areas of weak coverage, and without "bouncing" from one server to the next in quick succession. This "bouncing" or, more technically, lack of a dominant server, results in multiple handoffs which can seriously increase the chances for lost calls, dropped calls, handoff failures, or unacceptable audio. This plot also shows that there are areas in and around the site of the proposed cell location where the actual signal level is below desirable levels. The second plot shows the improvement in both signal level and the establishment of a dominant server which will be provided by the proposed cell site. The asterisks on the plot are actual drive data for the proposed site gathered by having a temporary test transmitter on a temporary test tower at the site. It can be seen that the proposed site not OD Q9 Recycled Paper • • only brings up the signal level in the surrounding areas, but it also provides for a solid and smooth transition from the site in the north (Pfaffle C Sector) to the site in the south (King City A Sector) along Highway 99W. In addition to resolving the dominant server issue in this area, this site will also provide increased capacity to the heavily traveled roads in the vicinity, while at the same time offloading capacity from the cellular sites which currently serve the area. For the above reasons, the proposed site is necessary to provide ongoing high quality cellular service. Sincerely, Carol Friz, P.E. " RF Design Manager Registered Professional Engineer, State of Oregon cf Attachments (2) COVERAGE WIT 1--1 PFROPOSEE? SITE - -; I 41, I COVERAGE PLOT (Ctarmel) _ I I _ I I d\ I I I I A l Desired Signal: Maximum Coreroge Threshold: -110 (d6m) L I I1 I Client• Market: Alaska I I , , User: matth Prepared 07/14/97 at 10:35 I I i m \ , - - I - I rifle is .ap et Ion rile "Nsgatlon 99W i , - - ? .,dam ? • --L-? A \ -? -` _ - r d - 1-- :sus MCDONALD ST' 4ULL MTN RD L-L i II S ?T $-S -P. j 1 1 1 l 7 I j4-J'" P P f - i --..1I I-- -F 7?\ 1 aanr x #y(de) aar aa.w 0C "(a) as MA I ? a ni e H W Y 217 PPPi O fl _ a m`\ I I We: Wink On s are 119W In red . \ I I "I I I i I Improvement in Local Servers due to the addition of the Proposed Site: * = PROPOSED SITE d = Pfaffle C Sector o = Viewmaster B Sector in = Pfaffle B Sector i = Viewmaster C Sector s = King City A Sector I Miles 0 0.25 0.50 0.75 I SCALE: 1:24,000 • • EXISTING COVERAGE COVERAGE PLOT (Channel) Desired Signal: Maximum - I I H W Y 217 I Coverage Threshold: -110 (dBm) client: d L- I , -1_ ' y(h p User: motth Alaska - - - ^ - - -? i I m Prepared 07/14/97 at 10:35 % )\. - flN 11°ttg0(1°II Flb N°riq°Uan --{ i- i ( 100410D2.grq El°t ab.w cc AcQ(ae) Bar aw.w cc Adl(i) Char - -- - ,d.. I- I -- i I trm \ rQ - - - - - i Ndw tbIkA dwaWs we I11t°0 N red •• I I d "" cn ?- I. m m \? I m I - d fl ;- /d' _ '• i'd ,=-I - rn - - -` r - i.. -? - -I- do -ryr i d*d c7?c b , b b m; b"?-b m m -?- I I b,_ 3ULL MTN RD MCDONALD - -?F - a T - T Current Servers in the Area ?t i i of the Proposed Site: I I I d = Pfaffle C Sector 9, s: _ I -I I i _ I o= Viewmaster B Sector in = Pfaffle B Sector - i = Viewmaster C Sector s= King City A Sector Miles P j-? 71 ET n - - 0 0.25 0.50 0.75 11 J I r SCALE: 1:24,000 AAT SLIM-LINE MONOF18LE SCHOLLS FERRY & NORTH DAKOTA AT&T SLIM-LINE MONOPOLE SOHOLLS FERRY & NORTH DAKOTA fR-5!vi/97 ,ruu -14..:.40 --FAX 503 226 8880 PITTOCK PORTLAND CRISPAIRE ATL WESCOR O?r1Sr97 TW. 17:14 FAX 7704339323 f ' Cxispaire Corporate Offices h Mar 9dCM,Ar?p VWWO a p.0. gM 400 • Cardl". rA 3404S (9121273-3636 a Fos (912) 275.6454 CondenserDCoil/CondCn@Or NircOutlets Ofeeschh The 2abu[at of thSound the from Wall-tiovmt Air CoaditiocMr. The mete= was laAgle ?roximat.s y S feat above gxvuad levwal and the microphone appzxmimately 700 up tvam, borisontal. - The Tabulated Data has not been corrected with Taspect to background noise. All amasured sound lev+el• have been rounded to the nearest decibel. The values contained in the Tabulated Dasl should be viewed with appzoximate/xefarence? values only. situation. Shelton Hobbs project $ngins+r page 3 of 3 Q 004 Q004 u-Aa-?SaM dbb=ZO Z6-St-XeW ZO " d £Zb0 S£Z £05 05ti15%97 THU 14:40 FAX 503 226 80 PIITOCR PORTLAND • 1&002 P ..nc• ,.? •..•e, Lau t?:la t13 7704339323 CRISPAIRE ATL +++ WESCOR 0002 t18t' L? ' T I a A.. UC15e1i11Q-tl'M?1l?Kt? r??ylt-LIYUl?J l Cnspaire Corpofate C)"ices i Manufacturing Plant • P.O. wn 400 • Cordele, GA 31015 (912) 273-3636 • Fax (912) 273-5154 IQRVAIit 110mm DATA `AVP MODI"o TEST M=ZZ-1 AVV12ACA- TEST DATE= 09/21/95 Sol= Lb'VZL DIS$AMM MON U=T w d8J?f 65 5 6Z 10 60 20 56 30 53 40 S2 so 51 60 DAC MOVM : 42 - 46 dBA TEAT l?+: AVP24 _ TE64 pASS: 0610 DZSTAti M FROM MZT 30mD LPL w423mf few 66 5 61 IO 56 20 S3 30 51 40 so so 49 60 B)LCKGMCCM: 3 9 - 4 9 dUA Page 1 of 3 c,?4.9-% =vl;w SOS u..ta-.SaM aVV : ZO LG-S i -XILIW 0 0 "EXHIBIT B" -- TAPED PROCEEDINGS (Verbal recording of hearing including public, staff and Hearings Officer communications.) NOTE: Tapes are located in the Records Vault, Planning Section. 0 0 "EXHIBIT C" -- WRITTEN TESTIMONY (Applicant's materials and pertinent correspondence filed with Hearings Officer prior to Public Hearing.) Agenda Item: 2.1 Hearing Date: July 7,1997 Time: 7:00 PM SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: AT A T MONOPOLE TOWER Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97-0004 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval for a 50-foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and associated equipment structures. APPLICANT: AT & T Wireless Services OWNER: Tigard Retail Center Partners 1600 SW Fourth Avenue 1815 SW 169th Place Portland, OR 97201 Beaverton, OR 97008 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial; C-G. 0 ZONING DESIGNATION: General Commercial; C-G. LOCATION: 13707 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S103DD, Tax Lot 00400. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108 and 18.130. SECTION II: STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Hearing's Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will ;not adversely affect the health, , safety and welfare of the 'City. Therefore,' staff >! recommends APPROVAL, subject to the following recommended conditions of approval: :.::. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0004 - A T & T MONOPOLE PAGE 1 OF 7 • • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING'I THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE Si IED: 3) 639-4171.) 1. The applicant shall modify the proposed site and/or landscape plan to provide one (1) paved, off-street parking space for the service vehicle. Alternatively, the applicant shall provide proof that the existing parking on the property exceeds the minimum parking ratio based on the existing commercial tenants within the shopping center. 2. The applicant shall provide fencing, landscaping, or other permitted method of screening of the ground mounted equipment. The screening shall be provided to the west, south and east of the leasehold area. The applicant shall maintain the screening materials that are provided in perpetuity. SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History The property is developed with a group of three (3) commercial buildings that are used for various types of commercial uses such as automotive repair, and a video rental store. The City has no record of any other more recent development applications having been filed for this property. Vicinity Information: To the north, south, east, and west of the leasehold area are areas within the same retail center property. To the north and west of the shopping center are existing detached, single-family residences. The properties that adjoin this site are developed with commercial uses except for areas to the north and west that are developed with detached, single-family residences. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is presently developed with three (3) retail buildings, parking, and landscaped areas designed to serve the existing commercial center. The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 50-foot-tall cellular communications tower facility and related equipment structures. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0004 - A T & T MONOPOLE PAGE 2 OF 7 • • SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build a 50 foot cellular monopole. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as a utility. Code Section 18.62 lists utilities as a conditionally permitted use in the General Commercial Zoning District. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.62 states that there is no minimum lot size requirements. Developments within the General Commercial Zoning District are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant states that over 15% of the existing site is already landscaped. Upon inspection of the site and review of the site plan, this appears to be correct. Because the proposed leasehold area is presently paved, the construction of this monopole facility cannot increase the current percentage of impervious surface on the property. For this reason, it is not recommended that additional landscaping be provided in conjunction with this request. Setback: Section 18.62.050 states that there is no front yard or side yard setback facing the street. No side and rear yard setbacks are required except; a minimum of 20 feet shall be required where a commercial use abuts a residential zoning district. The site adjoins a residential zoning district along its northwesterly property line. The proposed new ground mounted equipment structure is 25 feet from the northwesterly property line. The monopole would be 50 feet from the northwesterly property line. For these reasons, the proposed monopole and related equipment structure complies with the setback standards set forth in the General Commercial Zoning District for this type of use. Building Height Limitations - Exceptions: Section 18.98.020 states that any building located in a non-residential zoning district shall not exceed a height of 75 feet subject to certain criteria. Section 18.98.010 exempts structures that are not intended for human habitation. The proposed communications monopole is not intended for human habitation and is exempt from the height requirement as provided under Section 18.98.010. Street Trees: Section 18.100.035 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large), with a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height. The existing retail building was developed with street trees. These existing trees are not impacted by this proposal. For this reason no additional street trees are recommended to be provided as a result of this additional utility use. Screening Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0004 - A T & T MONOPOLE PAGE 3 OF 7 vehicular damage b some form of wheel guard or curb. cause monopole facilities by require a maintenance vehicle to access the site periodically, a minimum of one (1) off-street parking space needs to be provided, or proof that existing off-street parking exceeds the minimum standards. Based on the plan and existing site constraints, it appears that the existing retail use provides sufficient off-street parking to accommodate the service vehicle. It does not appear necessary to construct new parking for this purpose. The existing parking lot appears to provide more than the minimum required parking. Therefore, no additional parking lot screening appears necessary to comply with this requirement. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30-foot distance points with a straight line. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, signs, temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The height is measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. The applicant has not proposed to construct improvements that exceed the aforementioned height within the Clear Vision areas. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030 does not specify a minimum parking ratio requirement for an unmanned utility use such as the proposed cellular communications. monopole. The applicant states that periodically a maintenance vehicle will need to access the facility. The applicant has not provided parking to serve this development. Because the applicant states that a maintenance vehicle will be at the site, one (1) parking space has previously been required for this type of use. For this reason, the site and/or landscape plan shall be revised to provide one (1) off-street parking space, or the applicant shall demonstrate that the existing off-street parking exceeds the minimum standard for parking. Access: Section 18.108.080 states that commercial and industrial uses that require less than 100 parking spaces provide one (1) access with a minimum width of 30-feet, and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. No specific width is set forth for unmanned utility uses. The proposed leasehold area is accessed by an existing 24-foot-wide, two-way commercial service driveway. Due to the type of use, no specific width is required. The Fire District approved access to this facility, as proposed. Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Sections 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, and 18.130. The proposal's consistency with these Sections are reviewed elsewhere within this staff report. Site Development Review - Additional Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(2- 18) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180(A)(2) (Tree Removal), 18.120.180.(A)(3) (Exterior Elevations), STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0004 - A T & T MONOPOLE PAGE 4 OF 7 (Private Outdoor Areas: 18.120.180.(A)(5) (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.(A)(6)0, Residential Use), 18.120.180.(A)(7) (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), (18.120.180.(A)(8) (Open Space Dedication), 18.120.180.(A)(9) (Demarcation of Spaces), 18.120.180.(A)(12) (Public Transit), 18.120.180.(A)(17) (Signs) and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Section 18.120.180.(A)(18) requires that other applicable provisions of the underlying zone be addressed. These sections are addressed elsewhere within this report. THE FOLLOWING SUBSECTIONS ARE FOUND TO BE APPLICABLE FROM SECTION 18.120.180(A)(2 -18): (4), (10), (11), (13), (14), (15) and (16) and are reviewed immediately below. Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses: Section 18.120.180.(A)(4) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. The applicant's proposal did not indicate specific screening materials that would be utilized around the proposed fenced leasehold area. It is recommended that the applicant provide a screening plan that utilizes one (1) of the approved types of screening materials to screen the ground mounted equipment. Due to its 50-foot height and its communications purpose, it is not possible to screen the entire facility and still allow the necessary clear line of site to other antennae structures. The monopole itself has not been designed to attract attention due to its proposed neutral gray color and unobtrusive antennae panels that would be in line with the monopole itself. Section 18.120.180.(A)(4) also states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The applicant has proposed to screen ground mounted equipment through the use of new landscape plantings. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.180.(A)(10) requires that exterior lighting levels. be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The Police Department reviewed this application and had no comments or concerns with this development as proposed. Access: Section 18.120.180.(A)(11) requires compliance with the access standards set forth in Section 18.108. The applicable site access provisions are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Parking: Section 18.120.180.(A)(13) requires compliance with the Off-Street Parking Standards set forth in Section 18.106. The applicable Off-Street Parking standards of Section 18.106 are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Landscapin. Section 18.120.180.(A)(14) requires compliance with the Landscape provisions of Section 18.100. The applicable Landscape standards are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Drainage: Section 18.120.180.(A)(15) requires compliance with the surface water runoff standard of the 1981 Master Plan. No increase in runoff can occur because the affected portion of the property is presently a paved service area. For this reason, no new storm drainage structures have been recommended. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0004 - A T & T MONOPOLE PAGE 5 OF 7 Provisions for the Handca ed: Section 18.120.180.(A)(16?equires compliance with the handicapped accessibility standards of ORS Chapter 487. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the City will review the proposal for compliance with all applicable handicapped accessibility standards. Conditional Use: Section 18.130.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. 6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The use, as proposed, complies with all site development standards set forth for the General Commercial Zoning District. The leasehold area is physically separated from existing residential development due to the location of adjoining retail buildings. Fencing, landscaping, and existing development around the leasehold area will partially screen the proposed monopole and fully screen the ground mounted equipment from view. The applicant has not requested that public facilities be made available to serve this development as proposed. All applicable standards of the zoning district are met by this proposal, as reviewed within this staff report. The development of this facility will not generate large scale construction impacts due to the type of improvements that are planned. The site will also, not likely require the development of new parking. The applicant has also proposed to blend the antenna into the area and reduce the visual impact of the antenna. The antenna itself is described in the applicant's submittal as being a metal pole with antennas which are not expected to draw attention to the structure. This portion of the site to be redeveloped is paved so no unique, natural features have been noted. The small leased area requires no significant grading or engineering to develop the site as proposed. The applicant has not proposed to develop a site larger than needed for the proposed use. The specific development criteria of the Comprehensive Plan that addresses the development of this type of utility facility are contained within the adopted Community Development Code. The applicable development standards of the Community Development Code are addressed within this report. ° STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0004 - A T & T MONOPOLE PAGE 6 OF 7 • • SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Engineering Department has reviewed the street and public utility needs for this site. Because this facility will not directly adjoin a public street, no conditions of approval have been recommended concerning street or sidewalk improvements. Because the applicant has also not proposed to extend other utility services to the site, no conditions have been recommended concerning the provision of public utilities. The Building Division has reviewed this request and provided the following comment: A building permit is required for all fences, towers, and walls in excess of six (6) feet in height. Provision for handicapped accessibility will be required. No other comments or objections have been received. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS No other comments or objections have been received from affected jurisdictions. -; ?X? // ( ? V? PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP Associate Planner 2"?4'?4 ?• ?. APPROVED BY: Richa d Bewersdorff Planning Manager i:curpln/markr/cup97-04. rep June 27. 1997 DATE June 27, 1997 DATE STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0004 - A T & T MONOPOLE PAGE 7 OF 7 I sway y ? ? I?? i__I I I I I i? ANTEMAE AND 8UPFi0RT ?I E 16 STRUCTURE ?J O3 Z TOUER DESIGN BY OTHERS m W-6' X I6'-0' PREFABRICATED EQUIPMENT SHELTER FOUNDATION DESIC3d FOR TOUE;R AND EOSllPMENT SHELTER BY OTHER5 WEST ELEVATION 50U TN ELEVATION I=NHIBIT MAP , 4 L C L z a J a c? L 0 V CASE NO. A.T. & T Monopole SW Pacific Highway Site CUP 97- 0004 AML PARK ST PARK ST ?4 V Q ST 0 P R E --- > . - N PARK PL HILL VIEW ST ?? O U Vicinity map N CUP91-0004 ??°® U & T MONOPOLE TOWER 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 • Conditional Use Permit Application for the McDonald Rd. & 99W Cellular Site A Proposal Submitted to the City of Tigard Prepared for AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. 1600 SW 4th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97201 Prepared by W&H Pacific 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, Oregon 97008-7120 April 3, 1997 CRY OF TIGARD • i CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION Property Address/Location(s): 13707 SW Pacific Hwy I Tigard, OR Tax Map & Tax Lot #(s): T2S-R1W-3DD 400 Site Size: 0.95 acre Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)': Tigard Retail Center Partners Address: 1815 NW 169th Place Phone: City: Beaverton, OR Zip: 97006 Applicant': AT&T Wireless Services Att: Rdal Estate Mgr. I Address: 1600 SW 4th Ave-: Phone: City: Portland, OR Zip: 97201 REP: Chris Corich, W&H Pacific 8405 SW Nimbus Ave. When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. I PROPOSAL SUMMARY 1 The owners of record of the subject property request Conditional Use approval to allow (please be specific): construct a 50' tall monopole and equipment building for cellular-communi- cations. r 1 PRE-APP. HELD WITH: k4e A? 112)e DATE OF PRE-APP.: 2 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Case No.(s): Other Case No.(s): Receipt No.: Application Accepted By: Date: Date Determined To Be Complete::. . Comp Plan/Zone Designation: CIT Area: Rev. =9= 1:%curp1nVnasteMXCua.doc REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS ? Application Elements Submitted: p Application Form Owner's Signature/Written Authorization Title Transfer Instrument or Deed" p Site/Plot Plan (81h-X 11 ") (# of copies based on pre-app check list) CD Applicant's Statement (tt of copies based on pre-app check list) C3 Filing Fee $1,615.00 Table of Contents 1. PROPOSAL SUMMARY INFORMATION ............................... 1 II. INTRODUCTION ....................................................2 Background on Cellular Communications .................................... 2 Proposed Cellular Facility: Responding to Demand ............................ 2 M. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION .......................................... 3 Site Description ...................................................... 3 IV. REQUESTED LAND USE REVIEWS .................................... 3 V. RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA ...... 3 Compliance with Community Development Code ............................. 3 Site Development Review .............................................. 7 VI. RESPONSE TO CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA ......................... 9 VII. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ....................................... 11 RF Design/Collocation Issues ............................................ 11 Neighborhood Meeting ................................................12 VIII. CONCLUSION .....................................................12 IX. EXHIBITS A. Radio Frequency Engineering Report B. Site Plans & Elevations C. Neighborhood Meeting Notes X. ATTACHMENTS A. Owner Authorization B. Title Transfer Instrument C. Pre-Application Conference Notes D. Photograph of a Similar Installation 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 AT&T Wireless Services - McDonald & 99W Site Conditional Use Permit Application 1. PROPOSAL SUMMARY INFORMATION File No: Applicant: AT&T Wireless Services 1600 SW 4th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97201 Preparer for Applicant: Chris Corich W&H Pacific, Inc. 8405 SW Nimbus Ave Beaverton, Oregon 97008 (503) 626-0455 Property Owner: Tigard Retail Center Partners 1815 NW 169th Place Beaverton, OR. 97006 Request: 50-foot tall monopole with flush mounted antennas and a 12' by 16' equipment shelter Location: 13707 SW Pacific Highway Legal Description: T2S-R1W-3DD 400 Zoning: 1708-1116 General Commercial (CG) W&H Pacific, Inc. 1 April 3, 1997 1 1 1 1 0 1 I • • Conditional Use Permit Application AT&T Wireless Services - McDonald & 99W Site H. INTRODUCTION AT&T Wireless Services is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to install a cellular facility consisting of a 50-foot tall slim-line monopole and three flush-mounted panel antennas at 13707 Pacific Highway in Tigard: There will also be a small equipment shelter placed adjacent to the monopole. Background on Cellular Communications AT&T Wireless Services is one of the original licensees authorized by the Federal Communications Commission to provide cellular service to the Portland Metropolitan Area. In order to provide this service, a region is split up into smaller geographic areas called cells. Cells are theoretical cellular coverage areas. Each cell is served by a cellular facility consisting of transmitting and receiving antennas mounted to a monopole or other suitable structure and a shelter containing radio equipment. As a cellular user moves across the landscape, his or her call is passed or "handed-off' from one cellular facility to another. Each facility is connected to a mobile switching center, which provides connections to the land based phone network serving your home or office. When an individual cellular facility reaches its maximum capacity, in terms of the number of simultaneous calls it can handle, the cell is broken down into smaller cells and one or more additional facilities is added. The resulting cellular facilities typically operate with less power and at lower antenna heights. Cellular facility site locations are determined after a detailed analysis by radio frequency engineers. Site selection criteria include: surrounding topography, distance from other cellular facilities, proximity to traffic corridors and population centers or heavy usage areas, and other technical factors. Computer modeling and radio testing are also conducted to determine potential sites. Proposed Cellular Facility; Responding to Demand The AT&T cellular network is a mature system, having been in operation for nearly 12 years. Consequently, new cellular facilities are being developed and others are being optimized in an effort to enhance coverage, increase capacity, and improve overall system efficiency. New cellular facilities are added to a given area "sized" to accommodate local area needs. As a result, new facilities in heavy usage areas, such as Tigard, are designed to provide coverage to small, targeted geographic areas, which limits flexibility in site selection. The proposed cellular facility location on Pacific Highway is designed to enhance cellular coverage in Tigard including, portions of Pacific Highway, McDonald Road and surrounding neighborhoods. This facility will connect to other neighboring facilities in downtown Tigard (proposed), King City and at Pfaflle Road in Tigard (Exhibit A). Besides enhancing cellular coverage in these areas, the proposed facility will also greatly increase capacity in this high call volume area. W&H Pacific, Inc. April 3, 1997 2 AT&T Wireless Services - McDonald & 99W Site Conditional Use Permit Application M. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION The proposed transmitter/antenna site consists of a slim-line 50-foot tall galvanized steel monopole and an equipment shelter containing radio equipment. The monopole will be outfitted with three panel antennas measuring approximately eight feet long and twelve inches wide. Each antenna will be flush mounted on the sides monopole. The equipment shelter measures approximately sixteen feet long, twelve feet wide and ten feet tall and has an exposed earth-tone aggregate finish. The entire facility will be located within an approximately 900 square foot leased area. This lease area will be surrounded by a series of four foot tall bollards to protect the proposed structures. The proposed lease area will be screened from surrounding properties by existing commercial buildings ' on the subject property, as viewed from the north, south and east. Residential properties to the west are screened by existing mature landscaping located along the rear property line. 1, Site Description The lease area is accessed from Pacific Highway through a paved parking lot on the east side of the subject property. The lease area is located in the west-central portion of the approximately one acre subject property, in an unused area that is presently paved (Exhibit B). Existing development on the property includes three rectangular shaped approximately 30 foot tall retail-commercial buildings. The leased area is located adjacent to the south side of the westerly most commercial building. This building is presently used as an automobile repair shop. Other adjacent uses include commercial and multi-family residential uses to the south and east along Pacific Highway. There are single-family residences abutting the subject property to the west and to the north, across S.W. Watkins Avenue. IV. REQUESTED LAND USE REVIEWS The applicant, AT&T Wireless Services, is requesting Conditional Use approval to develop a utility facility pursuant to Section 18.13 of the Tigard Development Code. V. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA The following paragraphs are a response to the applicable development review criteria. Compliance with Community Development Code 18.62. C-G: General Commercial District 18.62.040 Conditional Uses W&H Pacific, Inc. April 3, 1997 3 t AT&T Wireless Services - McDonald & 99W Site Conditional Use Permit Application A. Conditional uses in the C-G district are as follows: 4. Utilities Response: The applicant is requesting permission to construct a 50-foot tall monopole and associated equipment building for cellular communications. This use is classified as a utility pursuant to Section 18.42 and is allowed as a conditional use. 18.62 Dimensional Standards A. Dimensional requirements in the C-G district are as follows: 1. There is no minimum lot area required. 2. The average minimum lot width shall be 50 feet. Response: The subject property is 140 feet wide. Therefore, the minimum lot width requirement is met. ' 3. Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18.96 and Section 18.100.130, the minimum setback requirements are as follows: a. There shall be no minimum front yard setback requirement... b. On corner lots and through lots there shall be no minimum setback.. C. No side yard setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the C-G zone abuts a residential zoning district... d. No rear yard shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the C- G zone abuts a residential zoning district: 1 Response: The subject property is not a corner lot. The rear yard adjacent to the proposed facility abuts a residential zoning district. The facility will be setback approximately 30 feet from the rear ' property line. Therefore, the setback standards are met. 4. Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18.98, no building in a C-G zone shall exceed 45 feet. Response: The proposed cellular communications facility is not intended for human habitation and is, therefore, exempt from the height limitation per Section 18.98.010. W&H Pacific, Inc. Apri13, 1997 4 ' AT&T Wireless Services - McDonald & 99W Site Conditional Use Permit Application ' S. Maximum site coverage shall be 85 percent including all buildings and impervious surfaces; and ' Response: The addition of the cellular facility will be not cause the total site coverage to exceed 85 1 percent. This satisfies the maximum site coverage requirements. 6 The minimum landscaping requirement shall be 15 percent. ' Response: The subject property was recently developed and contains in excess of the required 15% total ' site landscaping. 18.96 Additional yard setback requirements and exceptions. 1 18.96 020 Additional Setback.from Centerline Required. ' 18.96020 1. Arterial Streets: a. The required setback distance for buildings on arterial streets is the setback distance required by the zoning district plus the following distances measured from the centerline of the street: ' Response: A setback of 50 feet from the centerline of Pacific Highway is required. The proposed cellular facility will be located in excess of 200 feet from the centerline of Pacific Highway. This far exceeds the special setback requirement. 18.100.030 Street Trees I A All development projects fronting on a public, private street, or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length... Response: The proposed cellular communications facility development will occur behind an existing building with a developed street frontage. There are existing street trees along Pacific Highway. W&H Pacific, Inc. April 3, 1997 5 ' AT&T Wireless Services - McDonald & 99W Site Conditional Use Permit Application 18.100.110 Screening Special Provisions A. Screening. Special Provisions. 1. Screening of parking and loading areas is required... Response: The applicant is not proposing to develop parking in conjunction with this use and the proposed communication facility is unstaffed. Infrequent maintenance visits will use existing parking located at the premises. As a result, and as noted by staff in the pre-application conference, the listed parking lot screening provisions are not applicable. 18.102. Visual Clearance Areas L 18.102.020 Visual Clearance: Required. A. Except within the CBD zoning district a visual clearance area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to the intersection of two streets, a street and a railroad, or a driveway providing access to a public or private street. Response: The proposed facility will be located greater than 150 feet from the street facing property line. This is well outside the 30-foot vision clearance area. This standard is met. 18.106.030 Minimum Off-Street Parking Requirements Response: There is no minimum off-street parking ratio requirement for an unmanned utility use such ' as the proposed cellular communications facility. Infrequent maintenance visits will use existing parking located at the premises. 18.108 Access, Egress, and Circulation 18.108.080 Minimum Requirements: Commercial and Industrial Use ' A. Vehicle access, egress and circulation for commercial and industrial use shall not be less than the following (See Appendix, Figure 19): W&.H Pacific, Inc. April 3, 1997 ' 6 ' AT&T Wireless Services - McDonald & 99W Site Conditional Use Permit Application ' Response: This proposed use does not require that parking spaces be provided, therefore, two-way access is also not needed to serve this facility. Therefore, no specific access width is required for this use. Through the Building Permit Fite and Life Safety Review, any necessary revisions will be made to this plan for emergency vehicle access. Site Development Review ' Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that the development proposal be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The following are site development review approval standards applicable to the proposed cellular facility. ' 18.120.180 Approval Standards ' 2. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment a. Buildings shall be: (7) : Located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage; (ii) Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; ' (ill) Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire fighting; and (iv) Oriented with consideration for sun and wind; and b. Trees having a six inch caliper or greater shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. Response: ' The proposed facility will be located on a property that is already developed with a commercial use. The facility will be situated in an unused area within the parking lot that is presently paved. No trees will be removed as part of the development, nor will the ' topography be altered or the natural drainage be changed as a result of this development proposal. ' The design of the facility will take into account the ground conditions as part of the foundation design for the monopole. The ground is flat within the development area and shows no signs of current or past slumping or sliding. The monopole is less than two feet in diameter at the base. Consequently, it will not impair light or air circulation nor will it create an impediment for fire fighting. W&H Pacific, Inc. April 3, 1997 7 1 ' AT&T Wireless Services - McDonald & 99W Site Conditional Use Permit Application 4. Buffering, Screening, and Compatibility between Adjoining Uses: a. Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses... Response: Buffering and screening of the facility is provided by existing improvements and landscaping on the property. There are existing 20 to 40 foot tall coniferous trees located along the west property line, between the proposed facility and abutting residential uses. This will provide a considerable level of screening of the monopole structure from abutting residences. The existing commercial building abutting the site to the north will also screen greater than half of the 50-foot tall monopole structure as viewed from the north and north-east. Additional screening will be provided by the existing commercial building to south of the site as viewed from abutting properties to the south. However, it is not possible to screen the entire facility and still allow the necessary clear line of site to the antennae structure. The proposed 50-foot tall monopole structure, with flush mounted antennas is similar in design to many parking lot light standards. Consequently, it is far less obtrusive than the power poles and associated transmission lines that exist along Pacific Highway. These existing poles are greater than 60 feet in height. Furthermore, the building height requirement for non- utility structures in the General Commercial zoning district is 45 feet. The monopole structure is proposed to be only five feet taller than what the district allows for commercial buildings, which are permitted outright. b. On site screening from view from adjoining properties of such things as service areas.. . Response: The ground mounted equipment building and portions of the monopole will be screened by existing improvements and vegetation on the subject property. 10. Crime Prevention and Safety: d The exterior lighting levels be selected and angles be oriented towards... Response: The proposed communication facility will be located adjacent to building, away from pedestrian circulation areas. The facility will be illuminated from existing lights in the parking lot. No new lighting is proposed. W&H Pacific, Inc. April 3, 1997 8 ' AT&T Wireless Services - McDonald & 99W Site Conditional Use Permit Application 14. Landscaping a. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.100. b. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections S and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and ' c. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped, ' Response: As described above, the proposed communication facility is well screened from abutting properties by existing improvements on the site. Greater than 15% of the subject property is already landscaped. Therefore, gross site landscaping requirements are met. No new parking, loading or service areas are proposed. VI. RESPONSE TO CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA ' The following paragraphs will respond to the conditional use criteria contained in Section 18.130.040 of the Zoning Ordinance as well as some of the other information requested during the pre-application conference. ' 18.130 Conditional Use ' 18.130.040 Approval Standards and Conditions. A. The hearings officer shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a ' conditional use or to enlarge or alter a conditional use... 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; Response: ' The site size and dimensions are adequate for the proposed use. The lease are will occupy only a small fraction, approximately 2% , of the .95 acre site. The proposed facility will be located in an unused area adjacent to an existing commercial building. The proposal is ' consistent with the C-G district and meets all dimensional requirements. W&H Pacific, Inc. April 3, 1997 ' 9 ' AT&T Wireless Services - McDonald & 99W Site Conditional Use Permit Application 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. Response: The characteristics of the subject property are suitable for the proposed facility for several reasons. The size of the subject parcel is large enough to accommodate the existing structures as well as the proposed facility. The site area is flat. No unique, natural features have been noted on this site. The small leased area requires no significant grading to develop ' the site. Access to the site is easily obtained through an existing improved parking lot. The size and shape of the parcel is well suited for a proposed facility of this nature. In addition, the existing buildings will partially screen greater than 50% of the monopole structure as viewed from the north, north-east and south. Additional screening will be provided by existing 20 to 40 foot tall coniferous trees and other shrubs along the west property line. ' Another strength of this site location is its proximity to commercial areas and transportation corridors in Tigard. This proposed facility will help to better link telecommunications between King City and Downtown Tigard. The elevation of the site (±260' above sea level), ' allows the radio signal to have maximum coverage, and helps to limit "blind spots" created by ridge lines. ' 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. Response: The applicant is not requesting that public facilities be made available to serve the development as proposed. Power and telephone service are readily available to serve the proposed facility. The installation will not require any water or sewer, or any other public services. The facility is unsta$ed. Therefore, there will be virtually no traffic generated from the facility. In addition, the facility will help satisfy the increasing demand for wireless services in Tigard. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. Response: ' All applicable requirements of the zoning district are met. 5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section ' 18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. W&HPacific, Inc. April 3, 1997 ' 10 ' AT&T Wireless Services - McDonald & 99W Site Conditional Use Permit Application Response: No signs will be provided. As demonstrated in Section V., this proposal complies with the applicable approval standards of Section 18.120.180. 6 The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Response: The Tigard Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged and Community Development Codes ' have been adopted to implement it. Applicable Community Development Code approval criteria have been addressed. Comprehensive Plan Section VIII (B) under Public Facilities and Services (Private Facilities/Communication) does not address cellular communications. Goal 12 Locational Criteria [Section 12A.1.A. (1) and (2)]/Minor Impact Utilities and Facilities are applicable to this proposal. The proposed site location will allow AT&T Wireless Services to provide enhanced cellular coverage along portions of Highway 99, McDonald Road and surrounding neighborhoods. The facility will also allow for added call capacity in this high call volume area. AT&T is authorized by the Federal Communications ' Commission to provide cellular service to the City of Tigard. There are no visual traffic, safety, or noise impacts, which would limit or impair use of ' surrounding properties associated with the proposed cellular facility. The development of this facility will not generate large scale construction impacts due to the type of improvements ' that are planned. The facility is unstaffed. After construction, there will be a monthly visit by a service technician to ensure that the equipment is functioning properly. Access to the site is easily obtained through an access easement to a commercial driveway that provides direct ' access to Pacific Highway, a designated Arterial Street. The appearance of the 50-foot tall slim-line monopole structure is similar in design to many types of parking lot light standards and is less obtrusive than existing power poles and associated transmission lines along Pacific ' Highway adjacent to the site. In addition, the antennas will be flush mounted on the sides of the monople to further minimize visual impact. ' VII. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RF Design/Collocation Issues ' At the pre-application conference held on February 6th, staff requested that the applicant provide an engineering report documenting the need for the facility at the proposed location. This information ' is included as part of Exhibit A. W&H Pacific, Inc. April 3, 1997 11 V., 0 0 ' AT&T Wireless Services - McDonald & 99W Site Conditional Use Permit Application Neighborhood Meeting A neighborhood meeting was held on March 17th to discuss the proposed facility with surrounding property owners. As a result of this meeting, AT&T modified its proposal by flipping the layout of the facility so that the monopole is on the south-east side of the leased area, rather than the north- west side (Exhibit Q. This was done in response to concerns raised by operators of the appliance store on the property. Flipping the site plan also moves the monopole further away from residences located to the west. ' VIII. CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing analysis and findings, the applicant requests approval of the proposed conditional use permit application. The application meets all applicable criteria for approval. ' IX. EXHIBITS A. Radio Frequency Engineering Report ' B. Site Plans & Elevations C. Neighborhood Meeting Notes I. Iprojec11170811161 wpdotolmcdonold. app ' W&H Pacific, Inc. April 3 1997 12 1 1 1 1 1 • • EXHIBIT A Radio Frequency Engineering Report • • i 1 1 1 1 1 AT&T AT&T Wireless Services 1600 SW 4th Avenue Portland, OR 97201 Office (503) 306-7484 FAX (503) 306-7486 March 20, 1997 City of Tigard Planning Department Tigard, OR RE: Proposed cellular telecommunications site- McDonald Rd. & Hwy 99W Our Engineers have studied this site extensively and have concluded that this location is the only viable site that will meet our engineering needs and requirements. The studies for this area included computer modeling and actual testing of the sites to determine coverage, technical acceptability and suitability of the site. Whenever possible, we also conducted models or tests of alternate sites for collocation or joint construction. We have found no acceptable alternative to the site we have applied for. I have attached a statement and exhibits prepared by Matt Harkins, RF Engineer for this location. His statement and the "plots" clearly demonstrate the need for this communications facility, coverage of the proposed site, and unacceptability of the AirTouch site. We have purposely designed this facility to be low impact by using a 50' monopole and "slim line" antenna design. The slim line design allows us to close mount the antennas against the pole in a vertical fashion to minimize visual impact. Samples of this type of mount are enclosed. Please contact me at the phone number above if you have questions. Very truly yours, Ron Fowler, Real Estate Manager Op Recycled Paper • • McDonald & 99W Site Objectives: The main objective of this site is to improve coverage on 99W near Bull Mtn. Rd. Currently several sites serve this high area, and the average signal levels are quite high. Unfortunately, no single server provides quality service for the entire stretch of 99. The existing service is blamed for the high percentage of dropped calls and very poor audio for this heavily traveled route. The proposed site will provide acceptable, dominant service past Bull Mtn. Rd, and allow mobiles to hand directly into the proposed Tigard DT site. The AirTouch site located near Walnut Rd. and 99W, would not provide the high signal levels required to suppress the existing servers on the hill top. In addition, the AirTouch site is located so close to AT&T's proposed downtown site, the majority of the improved coverage would be redundant. Predicted coverage plots are attached for the McDonald & 99, Tigard DT and Walnut & 99 sites. These plots demonstrate the overlapping coverage of Tigard DT and a site located near Walnut on 99W. It may also be seen that a site located near Walnut Drive would not provide the required signal levels south of McDonald Rd (this site's main coverage objective). The proposed 50' monopole located near McDonald, was the only test site found that accomplished the sites objectives. For these reasons, co-location at the AirTouch site would not allow AT&T to provide quality coverage in this area. MATT HARKINS RF DESIGN ENGINEER l 7 5 l iC reless Services -' a ` - a -, c °?• - ` n = -- - :1 x ' ?_ f . verage Plot ei "''? 11 v2.4 II - u and 99W (AAA) Hy tlietcl 0 IS p !;I ,, A?• i ODEL . Okumura s? n r r ?? .=w LAT 45-25-14 N S \?s LON 122-47-04 W V 233 f t / ?FN :ijOLOGY N O ° ' ' AOIUS 25 mi o ;?' , : IALS 360 )) - l; A RAD 0.1000 mi V '' TENNA 70-12-OONASP TION 65 TN 0 4 `'?, `\: ERP 10.00 W 6 _-TILT 5.0 Mech y x Ht . 47 ft cA TT ER '? , ? ' Interstate Ro = oof (`s ;. , I (I --7 State Roadway local Roads ??-.? S? i I ?1 I 3 County Boundries `?3so? I_ ;4, `, F' o h "_?;?y ;. MSA-RSA jf ?,,(e' frr• ?• ?l.% •l. t.;a? =-!! Q i,., °? - -`1? W ?. ?- i ?,h ?• _ I- °• .? M1les (? ' .? I _ 0.25 0.50 0.75 4,000 03/19/97 15:37 1 III Id?? 1 I-- 4 hq• ?\ ??' ?'•. 1 a `SQ,. Grata -i i r •:I?•- _ mast- iii_" .. -.-.:.- ?,-:-?`, ? _ • \., ?- -G? ,-?; _=t:?-',... c / AT&T Wireless Services Oregon Signal Coverage Plot CelICAD II v2.4 SYS-CR-873 (AAA) ;Y s. _ SYS-873 - ?' Current V1 AB V3 ((AD) PROP MODEL Okumura - ?' LAT 45-25-36 N LON 122-46-37 W { ° ___ _ •ti - '' GE 174 ft MORPHOLOGY N )?11? RADIUS 25 mi ofy RADIALS 360 j:• ?? DELTA RAD 0.1000 mi ANTENNA 70-12-OONASP 111 ,• •... _ _ ; ??:: ORIENTATION 15 TN ERP 10.00 W \ 7' - ?: t a TILT 0.0 Elec ?j Tx Ht 45 ft THRESHOLDS OVERLAYS y >=-65 Interstate Ro • . _k _' 'rT - __ _ >=-75 State Roadway ,'? ROA' _ .ii , •I' = •p' ?' I =--3?_ Local Roads >=-95 County Boundries MSA.-RSA Z "? - %\?5?; O '.t • 700 I• O [[Q, ZO i • I•.?i v + Miles X00 I rii'„ f ?. J , ?? 1, r?, j _ • I 0 0.25 0.50 0.75 c ?? =E 1 SCALE: 1:24,000 03/19/97 15:51 7, •./??.I'1/ .1,C4.?.?' ? ?E3M--??/,y??? ? •/• •?' f? ? ?? 44 ,?'/i ?, Ir\?l:,ep ? ???' ?i- ?? 18 ( /? ?, .iY1! ::?? 't773t"YSg? p -ROAD _ ?':• I c 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EXHIBIT B Site Plans and Elevations 1 1 t 1 1 \\ I I , < w n 7-1 pt \ \ \ Tb%( l00 RRS EL.260.41 FT. / CITY QF TIGARD DATUM QP? .. TELE R1SER 7RANSF6RAER PAD T --- BUILD/AG PC, / CAS AETER ELECT. kETER SW ?`?TKI NS A ?E ryf fr ? ? I j? °?O ? ?A,LLLL?1 VICINITY MAP AAO BOLLARDS LEASE AREA BocuRDS SING .A°ACES PAYEkDVT - ?? REGISTERED ? PROFESSIONAL 8UILDIAG BEAR/AGS ARE 8A-(ED ON flE OREG00V AMM STATE COORD/NA7E SYSTEM. THE /AFORWTIM YAS DETERAIIAED 151NG OL08AL POS/T/aV/AG SMEN AEASMELENTS Y/TII LEICA ACM 2OO RECE/YERS. TXE DATA YAS 7R4NSTORWV TO AREGCN MLRTH (MO 83) MICH HAS A TIETA ANGLE OF I A 6EARIAG AF N 0/°J7'lf" E IS TRUE MIRTH. LAND SURVEYOR SIDEFALK OREGON tBBRUCE UARY 3, 1983 D. TOWLE 2030 RENEWAL DATE: 6-30-98 SCALE If/ - 50 1 -50 -25 0 50 100 /dcb1°Y°VMW160701M7VMAW SURVEY FOR: AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES DESIGN NSR SCALE I"=so' sxEEr A ~/ LAND SURVEYORS 1-360-695=1385 MCDONALD AND 99W SITE DRAWN HSR DATE J126191 1 ENGINEERS 1-503-289-9936 SECTION 3, T2S, R l W, W.M. TL 400 ENGINEERING INC. 1111 BROADWAY, VANCOUVER, WA 98660 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON CHECKED 8DT JOB N0. 6078 3 • u CC AVER QECT. AE7ER AAV MUMS 7Bv 1A9 Rw ELEV. 260.41 BASED ON BV 83 CITY CF r1aM DA7W + PAY61EV7 sf, BUILDING Sd°ACL:S' PAYEifN7 / i' ' J ID%' 7RE RISER iez afa? - UCE REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR OREGON FEBRUARY 3, 1983 BRUCE D. TOWLE 2030 RENEWAL DATE: 6-30-98 .7lzc 9-7 }? } + + + } j 1P Q? -oz + PAM30VT + S/A?IA[K + BEMIAGS AOE BISO aV 7AE aREGM AWN BUILDING % I + STATE COMINA7E SrSTM nE IAFaWTIaV O 1ER Srs ? ?I AEA fS 1 ILI A EI I? IRAA6F PAO ATVfSLS. TACOAM JAS 7RAA5fMED M + aWaW AWN (MV 83) MICR NAS A 7NE7A AMZE a< 1'37'!4'. A l7EAR/AV Or N 01'31'14' E IS W AWN. SCALE 1 30' -30 -15 0 30 60 -E 1 e LAND SURVEYORS SURVEY FOR: AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES DESIGN HSR SCaF 1'=3o' SHEET AV/ M P&OUN I- ENGINEERS 360-695-1385 MCDONALD AND 99W SITE DRAWN HSR DATE 3/26/91 2 i-503-289-9936 SECTION 3, T2S, R l W, W. M. TL 400 3 ENGINEERING INC. 1111 BROADWAY, VANCOUVER WA 98660 WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON CHECKED BOT JOB NO.6018 TBM 100 RRS ELEV. 260.41 BASED ON BY 83 CITY OF TIGARD DATUM ?g / n4 / PAVEMENT / TELE RISER GAS METER ELECT. METER AND BOLLARDS s' Jf A# PAVEMENT t u0E BUILDING < l + REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR OREGON FEBRUARY 3, 1983 BRUCE D. TOWLE 2030 RENEWAL DATE: 6-30-98 3'1Z6/-I 1 PSG SPACES tip WE -m L1£ARIAGS ARE BASED QY THE 0%-6M AWN STATE LOMINATE SYMTE6'. ME IAfQ4 UOY M a7VW1ACV I SIAG CL04AL POSIROVIAG SrSMV /E49G4aOVT5 F1771 LEICA AOM " IECEIV&S. 77C OATH M 7R ASrMfD 70 OjWa Y AWN (NAO Lu) /NIDV HAS A THETA AXLE Cr I'J7'14'. A "/AV OF N 01'37'14' E IS TRCEAWN. SIDEWALK BUILDING TRANSFORMER PAD Scale 1" = 20' -20 -10 0 20 40 60 LAND SURVEYORS SURVEY FOR: AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES DMGN HSR sCA1E 1n=20' SHEET ENGINEERS 1-360-695-1385 MCDONALD AND 99W SITE DRAWN HsR DATE 3/26/97 3 . 1-503-289-9936 SECTION 3, T2S, R 1 W, W. M. TL 400 3 ENGINEERING INC. 1111 BROADWAY, VANCOUVER WA 98660 WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON CHECKED 90r J08N0. 6018 CURB 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NORTH 1 VICINITY MAP A) NOT TO SCALE PRELIMINARY 5ET idvabl. ?.-?¦ NOW& AT&T YCDONALD A 99 CELL SITE 6HEET INDEX: Al. VICINITY MAP A2. SITE PLAN A3. PLAN A4. WEST AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS A5. NORTH ELEVATION AND 60LLARD DETAIL A6. GENERAL NOTES /I 1 r y VIDEO NORTH ? - V? 51TE PLAN © CWTRMW 11=40- AT4T WIRELE55 SERVICES miller • cook I600 W acn AVE. PORTLAND, OR 91201 Uh? archltecte, p.c. - a.i.a. PRELIMINARY ;,?T A McDonald 4 99 CELL 51TE 90 Kw. Mt AM /ORTLMD, *FAR*" *7"0 W" 13 018W PAC IC N1111' ?ICsARD a,4,? Job 91104 Dots 4/4/91 ;;;Wbg Q2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Noe / PRELIMINARY SET NORTH 0 KEYNOTE-5: 10 II'-6' X Ib'-0' PREFABRICATED EQUIPMENT SHELTER. 0 50'-0' MONOPOLE TOWER W/ 3 WHIP ANTENNAS. (TOWER FOOTING DESIGN BY OTHERS) O EXISTING PARKING LOT. 0 LEASED AREA PROPERTY LINE. O (13) NEW BOLLARDS 4'-0' O.C. AROUND SHELTER O (5) EXISTING BOLLARDS. 0 EXISTING GAS AND ELECTRIC METERS. O EXISTING ON SITE BUILDINGS O WAVEGUIDE BURIED ' 0 3080X 3'-b'H CONCRETE PROTECTIVE BASE. ii EXISTING LANDSCAPING ANTENNAE AND SUPPORT STRUCTURE TOWER DESIGN BY OTHERS Il'-b' X IV-0' PREFABRICATED EQUIPMENT SHELTER FOUNDATION DESIGN FOR TOWER AND EQUIPMENT SHELTER BY OTHERS' ut a 1+ 3 0 0 0 0 M WEST-ELEVATION 2 60UTH ?A4J 1/s1=11-0. PRELIMINARY SET AT4T WIRELESS SERvICES 1600 5W 4th AvE. PORTLAND, OR 91201 McDonald d 99 CELL SITE 131 1 W PACIFIC NWY TfC ORECsON 91`123 vanoN T0 miller - cook Ooh architects, p.c. - a.l.a,. 90 ILw. I" AM ?OM11.MO, *MGM 9"" W" 229.99!! J" 91104 A ?a4/4/9? ??? 44-J l NORTH ELEVATION PRELIMINARY SET r 2l BOLLARD DETAI ATaT WIRELESS SERVICES 1600 SW 4th AVE. FORILAND, OR 91101 CONCRETE C WM 11 MINIMUM V DIA. STD. PIPE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE CONC FILLED PAINT W/ TRAFFIC YELLOW 1-COATS CONC. WASH A.C. PAVINIs 1810 CONCRETE EASE (E) COPTRMiMT miller • cook loon architects, P.C. • a-La. W M.W. At AM PORTLAMP, 0898M qla mm 2!0-06= 6148 jD*t64/4/1b1 Dmwl" A 9 5 I 0 0 GENERAL NOTES: L VERIFY AND CONFIRM ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN OR IMPLIED ON THE DRAWINGS AS WELL AS THE PHYSICAL CONDITIONS OF THE SITE. NOTIFY ARCHITECT OR AT4T WIRELESS SERVICES FIELD CONSTRUCTION MANAGGER OF DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO START OF WORK 2. ALL MATERIALS AND WORMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM TO THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, APPLICABLE STATE AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. 3. ASSUMED SOIL BEARING: SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT 4. PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL AS REQUIRED BY GOVERNING JURISDICTION. 5. REMOVE ALL. EXISTING CONCRETE AND ORGANIC MATERIAL IN AREAS SHOWN TO RECEIVE WALKWAYS, SERVICE YARDS, AND BUILDINGS TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6'. 6. GRUB OUT ALL STUMPSAND ROOTS LAB'ER THAN 1111' DIAMETER REMOVE ALL. SCRAP METAL AND ALL FOREIGN MATERIALS 1. DISPOSE OF CLEARED AND DEMOLISHED MATERIAL AS STATED IN AT4T WIRELESS SERVICES SCOPE OF WORK 8. EXCAVATION SHOULD BE PERFORMED IN A MANNER WHICH WILL CAUSE A MINIMUM DISTURBANCE TO THE SURROUNDING AREA THE AREA ADJACENT TO THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE GRADED SO THAT WATER WILL NOT RUN INTO THE EXCAVATION. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL HAVE SHORING IN ACCORDANCE WITH OSHA REGULATIONS. SEE AT4T WIRELESS SERVICES STATEMENT OF WORK, SECTION Il FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES. 9. EXCAVATE FOR FOOTINGS, FOUNDATIONS, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS TO SIZES AND LEVELS SHOWN OR REQUIRED. ALLOW FOR FORM CLEARANCE AND FOR PROPER COMPACTION OF REQUIRED BACKFILLING MATERIAL. SEE AT4T WIRELES SERVICES STATEMENT OF WORK, SECTION 11 FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 10. ALL FOOTINGS TO BEAR ON FIRM, NATURAL, UNDISTURBED SOIL FREE OF ORGANIC MATERIAL OR ON ENGINEERED FILL. 11. EXCAVATE ALL SOFT, WET, OR SOIL OF UNUSUAL CONDITION TO FIRM, NATURAL, UNDISTURBED SOIL, AND BACKFILL WITH SPECIFIED FILL MATERIALS. 12. COMPACT AREAS BENEATH STRUCTURES AND FOUNDATIONS TO S5% OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM 01551 OR AASHTO T-180, STANDARD METHOD OF TEST FOR MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS OF SOIL USING 101b. (45 k 3J RAMMER AND AN 18' (451 mm) DROP. MOISTURE CONTENT WITHIN 3%. OF OPTIMUM AT TIME COMPACTION. B. BACKFILL MATERIAL TO BE SELECTED NATURAL FILL MATERIAL FROM ON SITE EXCAVATION OR OFF-SITE BORROW, TO CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING BLEND: WELL GRADED GRANULAR PIT RUN, OR BANK RUN SAND, AND/OR GRAVEL, SMALL COBBLES UP TO 11/2' IN MAXIMUM SIZE WITH NOT MORE THAN 10% OF FINES PASSING THROUGH A NO. 200 SIEVE, OR APPROVED ON-SITE EXCAVATION MATERIALS. SEE AT4T WIRELESS SERVICES STATEMENT OF WORK, SECTION 11 FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 14. MAXIMUM 6' LIFTS, COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM 0551 OR ASSHTO T-180. 'SEE AT4T WIRELESS SERVICES STATEMENT OF WORK, SECTION 12. S. PROVIDE MINIMUM OF 6' OF 3/4' MINUS MINIMUM WELL GRADED MISC. ROCK BELOW EQUIPMENT SHELTER Woo. STRIP MINIMUM OF 6' AT ACCESS ROAD. PROVIDE MINIMUM OF 6' OF 3' MINUS' AND TOPPED WITH 3' OF. 3/4' MINUS WELL-GRADED CRUSHED ROCK AT ACCESS ROAD, CROWN 3' AT CENTER SEE AT4T WIRELESS SERVICES STATEMENT OF WORK, SECTION 12.4. 11. REINFORCING BARS TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTM A-614. GRADE 60, DEFORMED BARS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLANS. SEE AT4T WIRELESS SERVICES STATEMENT OF WORK, SECTION 14 FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 18. CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3,000 P,Sl AT 18 DAYS WITH A MINIMUM SLUMP OF 3' AND A MAXIMUM OF 5' DURING PLACEMENT. CEMENT TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C 140, TYPE I OR TYPE 2. WATER TO BE POTABLE. AGGREGATE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTM C 33-86. USE OF FLY ASH 15 PROHIBITED. ADMIXTURES WHEN USED ARE TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS AND APPROVED BY THE FIELD CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AIR ENTRAINMENT ASTM C 260-86 WATER REDUCING AGENT ASTM C 494-86 ALL OTHER MIXTURES ASTM C 494-86 USE OF CALCIUM CHLORIDE IS PROHIBITED. SEE AT4T WIRELESS SERVICES STATEMENT OF WORK, SECTION 14 FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 1% TOWER AND WAVEGUIDE BRIDGE SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY OTHERS. 10. MATERIALS SUPPLIED BY AT4T WIRELESS SERVICES AS LISTED IN STATEMENT OF WOW 11. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL CONCRETE, REINFORCING STEEL, AND HOLODOWN CONNECTIONS. I I PRELIMINARY SET 1 1 1 11 1 1 6 6 EXHIBIT C Neighborhood Meeting Notes ' Meeting Minutes for Public Meeting Proposed Cellular Tower - Hwy 99W, Tigard Motors ' AT&T Wireless Services ' The meeting began at 7:30pm and ended at 8:40pm at the Tigard Water Department auditorium. Staff attending included: ' Kelly Sweenson, AT&T Jason Wells, AT&T Chris Corich, W&H Pacific ' Spencer Vail, Spencer Vail Planning Four individuals came to the meeting. A copy of the sign-up sheet is attached. Two were neighbors to the north west and two were from an adjacent business (A-Jax Appliance Service). ' Issues discussed included: 1. Design and locational requirements. There was a general discussion of the design of the pole, ' the site requirements for the cell system, and how cellular systems work. 2. Visual impact of the pole. The two neighbors were concerned about visual impact. The location ' of the pole was verified to them and they realized that it would not impact their homes. There was also discussion of the design - AT&T uses a slim line pole/antenna design which minimizes the visual impact by eliminating a large triangular platform (AMPS platform) at the top of the pole. The low height of the pole was also discussed. ' 3. Access and Parking at A-Jax Appliance. The operators of the appliance operation expressed concern about access to their parking and circulation with the pole/equipment shelter. The isle between their parking and the most narrow point with the cell site was calculated to be twenty four feet. This meets the city of Tigard standard for two way circulation within a parking lot. In an effort to maximize the circulation space available, AT&T is considering flipping the site plan - reversing the location of the pole and the equipment shelter. This will make it possible to move the bollards which will protect the site in near the pole which will make it possible to narrow the space taken up by the cell site and thus increasing the area available for circulation. ' 4. Power Requirements/Contents of the Shelter. Questions were raised about the power supply to the equipment shelter and the type of back up power used by the system. Back-up power was identified as gel-cell batteries. Power supply to the shelter was identified as a call-back item (note: ' the power requirement is 200 amp - similar to a single family residential home - this information was provided to the person with the question). Meeting Minutes for Public Meeting Proposed Cellular Tower - Tigard Main Street AT&T Wireless Services The meeting began at 6:30pm and ended at 7:30pm at the Tigard Water Department auditorium. Staff attending included: Kelly Sweenson, AT&T Jason Wells, AT&T Chris Corich, W&H Pacific Spencer Vail, Spencer Vail Planning Staff were present the entire time and no members of the public came to the meeting. A public meeting for a different cell site was started at 7:30pm at the same location. J'p Filed: minutes.doc AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN (-,).CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING. RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: ,.;..,.:..:...... . 1315 SW Hall Boulevard" ' Tigard, OR 97223 I, ?p c V ?ar ?n ; o , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed (ono(; h?a( vt-- ? I? uafi.i? A cell mooogole affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) /3-76-7 S t'j 1-1101A u , and did on the a a day of 1= e b ruar4 19 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a L'flndl?l0no( use application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. (state location you posted notice on property) Signatur a pres of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the z? day of , 19.. ffefiftrA YANROM1 YIISON NMW PllBUC • OFiEWN COMMf10 MY NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON SON EIQ?IRES AML APRIL 1 16, 2000 My Commission Expires: 1 /6 - zI)a D Applicant, please complete infor=ation below for proper placement with proposed project) _ ___ ________ _ _ _ r?iAOF PROJECTOR PROPOSED NA.IM: -----, E OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: ame of Applicant/Owner. ' Address or General Location of Subject Propertyi ubject groper` y Tan Map(s) and-Lot -I(s):- ----------------------------------- -J n Jg4,,vr=ers%m1pnsurat ' AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ' STATE OF OREGON ) SS. ' City of Tigard ) 1, being duly swom, depose ' and say that on 1: l? LA tI"(4 D(, 19 q7 I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) ' 13-707 Sw Pac1j),- l?t?cct? a?T?4 OR ' a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said ' persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at ( I gAzs tA)e-re, ,o; ckel1 '4P ov - 005 SW otmbuS Ave-. t3e?verkn ), with postage prepaid thereon. Signatu e n the p s nce of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETEINOTARIZE) Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the day of e4,--1.+cwu ' am= VANWILSOPI COMMISSION NO. 053183 ' MY COMMISSION WRESAPRIL16,2000 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: q_ lb-Loon qApplimr.t. :)lease complete information below for proper placement with proposed projet r) r------ ----------------------- ----------------------------------------? "ti OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED MkNIE: i E OF PROPOSED DEti?LOP.tiiEN'T: ame of ApplicancOwner. Add-ess or General Lxatioa of Suoject ?:roperrf uo•ec` Prcpe_ y Tax flap(s) and Lot T(s): -----? --------------------- --------------- n:'login baayvrus;ers?Ynad. rust ' Date: ' Name and Address 0 0 7 ? tzellt ' Re: Communication Facility Development Proposal 13707 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard Oregon ' Dear Property Owner: AT&T, with the permission of the property owner, will be submitting an application to the City of ' Tigard for a conditional use permit to construct a 50' tall cellular phone monopole at 13707 SW Pacific Highway. The proposed monopole will be located in the parking lot of Tigard Motors. This monopole will be similar in height and design to the AT&T monopole located next to the Oil Can Henry near the McDonald's on SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW 125th Ave. If you are in the area, drive by and take a look at it. At 50' tall, it is very similar in size to most utility poles and parking lot light poles. ' Prior to applying to the City for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting at: ' Where: Tigard Water Department, Richard M. (Dick) Brown Auditorium When: 7:30pm - 9:00pm t Date: Monday, March 17th, 1997 The Water Department is located adjacent to Tigard City Hall at 8777 SW Burnham Rd. (see ' attached map). This will be an informational meeting on the preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to ' submittal of the application to the City. ' W&H Pacific is working with AT&T as the planning consultant on this project and we look forward to seeing you at the meeting and discussing the proposed development. If you need more information prior to the meeting, please feel free to call me at 626-0455 between 8am and 5pm. ' Sincerely, W&H PACIFIC, INC ' Christopher B. Corich Development Planner ' Filed: i:\project\17081116\wpdata\notice.mem Preston & Lisa Vielbig Marion Ward Helen Cook '0725 SW Fairhaven Way 10600 SW Fairhaven St 12265 SW 128th Ave ' 1gard OR 97223 Tigard OR 97223 Tigard OR 97223 ' Christopher Gardella John Chamberlain Carla Gardella Allen Zandonatti A Debra 10690 SW Fairhaven St 10680 SW Fairhaven Way 10710 SW Fairhaven Way Tigard OR 97223 Tigard OR 97223 Tigard OR 97223 ' David Hammes & S Vicke 10740 SW Fairhaven Way ' Tigard OR 97223 Erwin Schacht Jr. W Marjorie 10770 SW Fairhaven Way Tigard OR 97223 Ralph Peters & A Barbara 10800 SW Fairhaven Way Tigard OR 97223 ' David & Teresa Gooley 4635 SW 42nd Pl Portland OR 97221 Thomas & Cynthia Mulflur •4535 SW Tarlow Ct Portland OR 97221 Doris Mae Soller ' 2094 Summit Dr Lake Oswego OR 97034 Juliane Shippey 10740 SW Garden Park P1 Tigard OR 97223 Phillip Kelleher Barbara Kelleher PO Box 23023 Tigard OR 97281 Kenneth Spence V Georgia 10405 SW Hillview Dr Tigard OR 97223 Randolph & Leann Glahn 10750 SW Garden Park P1 Tigard OR 97223 Eorge Crawford J Sandra 10395 SW Hillview Dr Tigard OR 97223 i Theodore & Helen Gano 8914 NW Lakeshore Ave Vancouver WA 98665 TIGARD LODGE NO 207 Caron Rubin Af & Am Of TIGARD RETAIL CENTER PAR 520 SW 6th Ave #400 PO Box 230184 3164 NW 114th Ter t Portland OR 97204 Tigard OR 97281 Portland OR 97229 'CHARITY LODGE NO 75 IOOF 11055 SW Cottonwood Ln 'Tigard OR 97223 Lloyd Gilbertson J Darlene 15980 SW Colony P1 Tigard OR 97224 TIGARD GRANGE NO 148 11222 SW Cottonwood Ln Tigard OR 97223 EMPIRE ENTERPRISES INC 422 Railway Street V6a 1 CANADA .lian Martin 10965 SW Pathfinder Way Tigard OR 97223-3930 Colleen Fowler 13605 SW Watkins Ave Tigard OR 97223 Chris Corich 6595 SW Alden Street Portland OR 97223 Pietro Vitiritti 14115 SW 157th Pl Tigard OR 97224 CITY Of TIGARD COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT TEAMS (CFPS) NO IIf ICAIION I ISI* r0It Al'I'l.ICANf5 WII I I IAND USE I'llOPOSA1 S wl!Sf CIT.I.ANII 1151: 61111COAMITTCC CAST CIT Abdullah Alkadl 11005 SW 125111 Coml llgard, OR 97223 (503)524.1060 Bill s 110 W 1351h Avenue Tlgard, OR 07223 (503)524.6325 Kallrle Kallio 12940 SW Glacier Lily Drive ligard, OR 97223 (503)'524.5200 Eli I lowdon 11020 SW Moming I fill Tigard, OR 07223 (503) 524.0040 Bonno & Jim Roach 144.47 SW Twokesbufy Drlva Tigard, OR 97224 (503) 500.0401 KaAinson 11410 SW Ironwood Loop Tlgard, OR 07223 (503)590.33GO I'LVASC NOM In arlclillon l on land use Clafk 0. Zeller 13200 SW Shoe Drive Tlgard, OR 91223 (503) 524.0094 Larry Wesle?nran 13065 SW Fem Sheol Tigard, OR 07223 (503) 524.4550 Clulsly Ilorr 11306 SW Ironwood Loop Tigard. OR 97223 (503) 590-1070/(F,03) 624-0000 Bafbara Snlgcr 11245 SW Morgan Coufl l lganl, OR 07223 (503)G04.0303 0evefly Fromfe ralg I Inpklns 12200 SW Oull Morrnlairf Road 7430 SW Vams Slr Tigard. OR 97224 llgard, Oil 97223 (503) 630.2529 Kalhy Smllh 11645 SW Cloud Coufl Tlgard, OR 97224 (503) 030.0804 1.I11da Masters 15120 SW 141st Avenue I Igaid. OR 97224 (503) 020.7602 icoll Russell 31201 Raymond Creak Iload arnppoose, OR 07050 (503) 643-2434 June Srflll?idun Cal Woolnry 15040 SW 140111 Avenue 12350 SW 132nd Coufl Tlgard, Olt 07224 Tlgard, OR 07223 (503) 500.05123 (503) 500.4207 D properly owners wilhbr 250 feel, notice of meelblgs proposals shall be sent to all Ilia names on Ilds Its(. (Iff 6 t )11'1' 11 l' I'f .lack "t"elly"" 15525 SW 1001h Avenue 'llilaf?I, 01 1191224 John Ilannelh 15550 SW 1091h Avenuo llgard, Oft 97224 CUM IIA1. CIT "flan Marlin 10965 SW I'allrfifccler Way *1lumd. Olt 07223.3030 ?l b IMyMfP M. W?11111 W IUw?M n.' • •?v f ? Mark F. Mahon 11310 SW Dist Coull Tigard, OR 07223 Joel Slovefis 9060 SW Vantura Courl Tigard. OR 97223 Pat Wydrn 0122 SW Spnfce Sifocl Tigard, Oil 01223 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • a AT&T Ron Fowler AT&T Wireless Services 1600 SW 4th Avenue Real Estate Manager Portland, OR 97201 Cellular Division 503 306-7484 - -CELLULAR 503 780-7648 FAX 503 306-7486 EMAIL rfowler® pdxceilii. nwest. mccaw.com - ------ --- - --- AT&T AT&T Wireless Services Spencer Vail 4505 NE 24th Avenue Site Acquisition Consultant Portland. OR 97211 Cellular Division 503 281-8245 CELLULAR 503 789-7632 FAX 503 284-5506 N Tigard Water Department 8777 SW Burnham Road Tigard, Oregon 97223 0 j;o v?y -T:tGAQ WAR DF NA?? GDoN ALD J Q u ' Meeting: AT&T Wireless services Public Meeting Proposed Cellular Tower - Hwy 99W ' Date: 3/17/97 Time: Name Address Phone i ?.? CIC 13 7--27 s•w. nN•e of z- 1372 ? SI J Vic... &39 -/9 /J ' r.1 1t?t63 (s- (°7'"2 S S(?J 2024 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L 1 1 • • ATTACHMENT A Owner Authorization • • November 26, 1996 City of Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97224 Re: Land Use Application Proposed Cell Site To Whom It May Concern: Negotiations are currently under way between Tigard Retail Center Partners and AT&T Wireless Services of Oregon, Inc., to finalize a lease on the property located at 13707 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. I am aware of the need for AT&T Wireless Services to make application to the Tigard Planning Department for approval of their proposed plans, as well as a building permit at a later date. I have no objection to their making such application at their own cost and risk. Please accept this letter as authority from the property owner to allow the processing of such application. Very Truly Yours, Taehoon Chung General Partner i • 1 1 ATTACHMENT B Title Transfer Instrument 04/07/97 MON 14:08 FAX 503 306 7486 ATT WIRELESS Y 89-48353 Fidelity Notional Title Company of Oregon wauaVaa ca" 0«O RTATUTOIIY WAIIRANTIf V a"a.1.1ve°n. to CAIN JAMS LOREN,. CAIN, and DIIRLEIJE 1.:.. ....... ,.._. ,..... _ .».......... -...._. - .............................» ., r .... .................... nt «r eon ....... . ...... ?rranre to - o..... ni'tecr »aTt iieY'ship _TIC pgD RETAILN$cR YAt???1ER t.. an ?Ted R .............................................. as ..,____ ., ............... ...» .................... -.» ... _ and ciea? o encumbrances except as +Peci/icolly set tort" v lron:ee, the fotioluirsdescebed real...... .. ropsrty ...,..l.....ne» .... .. l '. ?G1 herein, situated in the county ol» .W.a.! !AEon..........• state of Ore on, to wit. ' SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A11 Q 3 I g 8 w H F c?J I: -I t r Set to and exceptlrlr 1989/909 realdproperty rtaxescwhich are alien not6yetial districts if any. . payable. THIS L•vSTRUMENT WILL 40T ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED W TH15 INSTRUMENT LH VIOLATIONOF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAVFS AND r,EGULATIONG. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT INE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THC APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTME4T TO VERIFY APPROVED USES. THETRUE AND ACTUAL CONSIDERATION FOR THIS CONVEYANCE IS S, ?2-e.000..-a0__.... _ ._?......._.__.....---..:... __ .... -- _.... . (SW ORS 93.030) a•.Se1Wn* COUMTV MAL MAt'1RTt' -"WrER rA.t• - s?z5 °• ?'o ?c FtE PW* WTI! idn,rA?r. -pine; 2-12-91 Dued this MildeP of QC.CA)k--.»•.•.•.-••- . Is ....a9 ..James or Cain ? . •.- STw1tt OF ORSOON. Comdr el•-. - •••••« -^ ) .........................._........... fe-. _.. .........................eM ......._._._.......-._ ..............nhe` beta t1oy .,.mn. each Irr fu0nwfl end not one for ch. dMr, did rr Nan W torerr i• dhe _ .............. _............. _ .....0"Ident ewe rhaf the fever k the 0 ooserulm.. e0d tfrt rM wal dfird n tM•MpfM lh9tra0.w+V to rhr ebrywrea reef of rid carpratien and thol .dd ieurument - aided am w44d ;e A - at tAamoi .Josid .,n h4dd a 'Mu. rvot root . he vewMUo?y an ad dud. salon nor (OFFrClAL '0?? _ SEAL) ..... Fermi /a Oneow ...... _ .»• ••« NO&IFY My eeamrwfen stakes: ......................... .i?1M ................................. ...-.......................................... ...49.10..... ...................... re. ..eeeets a Wet Ti?erd Retail„Center„Pnlcnerar.'3Ul ; W-... PSlL-6-A cry..9.4a...'-..-- u- nowman- OR 9703.1 .......................... 1M0a • 4?.oP Y w'r'e a r. e..r.. W a. . W 0. w. 0r.wy .aewa . f?>e s.?tE l=¢..Rt;ov_tr ........ __ ......... ...._....... ....... ?....» ...... ....... » . r.»...._............................... r? PRO••Oali _ _ STATE OF OREGON. County or, « I eeytiry that tlYe taithin Instru- ment wu r*:tiued for record on the --_ , -- day o/....... ................ .19...... ct .............. o ei0^t Al.. and recorded Li boohlreei/uolume No.,,.,_».......... an Pare », ,,,:,,, ; or a doeumenl/ice//ite/ instrument/mierofidnl No ..................... Record orDeeds Of add county. Witness my hand and seat of County affixed. By...--_.-..»..».»._.,.r............ Deputy UU2 to to 6 STA79 OF OREGON, 2 ? Clackamas s /07/97 MON 14:09 FAX 503 306 7486 ATT WIRELESS :.c td EXHIBIT "A" C.2 Order No. W 42660 p page No. 4 h1ESCRIPTION A t=est of land in the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3¦ Township 2 South. Menge 1 West. Willamette Neridion. in the City of Tigard, Washington County. Oregon. deacribed es follows: 4 Beginning at the eoutheset corner of lot g. MROSE ADDITION; thence North 679 OP West along said Lot 8. 68.94 feet to a steel axle; there North 390 O1' Hest 106.4 feet to an iron pipe along the south line of Lot 7. ?=.P.OSE ADDITION; thence North 780 24' West 132.2 feet to the southwest comer of said Lot.7. said point alao being on the southeasterly line of Lot 5. Block 5. FAtRHAVEN CDURT: thence Southwestcrly along the southeasterly line of Lots 5 and 6 Block 6. 8AIPJL0EN COURT 170.66 to the most Southerly aauthesst corner of said Lot 6: thence South 85A 58' East 331.65 feo?•re or Its@, to a Northeasterly oit along the Westerly boundary of S.V. Pscific Highway: thence the reaterly boundary-of said highway 140 feet to the point of beginning. STATE OF CAMON ' wanly o1 wau"eves„ S 1. Dono?d YJ.1[apon Odamar of Aoaasemen; and TeraYOn en ?1?r aeadw of Coe- the Qom` rya dAK °° n00od.ad„1 nd d 0 a Ex. n aj% V Doc 89048353 Rest: 19350 • 241.00 10/06/1989 11:05:06AK 2 003 ti?,•Ft'•' 4/07/S7 MON :10 FAX 503 306 7486 ATT WIRELESS "1n.`rr •??. --:^_??o-.....« -? ? ..,.... • I .....?_.......:-/viii.. yb Fidelity National Title Campany of Oregon 89-48355 ?? . tralw° %MTV ................................................. ..... :HOLDLNG4. 1NC., en Ora?on CocPoratlon...............•.•.....•...... ..................._........ ....................... _ .. ... grantor, Collor s an y,arrants to ....... ?o ...................................... it•?AAti 1i€i'XYC'• ....?'iN7ER PARTNER. an Ote on lia"lted part. .naieliip ? ..............•.... ........ .............................................................................. ........................•........ . F ........................_... . ' .. eseepi .. as aped flcalt)• set fort h v .....?antee,. t .. (olfow ng described rev! properly, (rK and clear of enc . u . m ... brances . ?p Reohington ............. 9tate o/ Oregon. to wit: herein, situated in the county of .................... Late 7 and 8. HELIIOSE• Washington County. Otegoo. s- fs. Subject to and excepting: U.3 C.3 ell THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUmm IN VIOLATION APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULMIONS- BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPEPTY SHOULD CHECK WITII THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNT"! b PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROV¢D USFS eg THE TRUE AND ACTUAL CONSIDERATION FOR THIS CONVEYANCE IS 5 ...N.Op.----------------•-•• ......- ........«.....,_ -_. .............. ._._._..•...... .................. ......... - _ .....•.•.........._...._._.....•.....••...». - -- -r..._..........? .-._ ................... .................. -.? ........_.---- -......._.. _..-- -....«..___ .-.........., (See DRS 93.0701 D, sued `Lhls .: A _ day of . _. O mime .......... .19 89 ; . WTH Holdings, Inc. ............................................... Cl?ekamae T ? ..F.... OR oON, ",a, .1.. ..___ ...............)tt. ?eoQ srArs of ol:acoN. ..... _is gg'....... ......._•_ ser _.•..... County d ...................................... aa. ST Pr.runr.rp.ared.................nr ..................................• If ......... • ........._..._.._._..........rbe, bafnd duly t•..w. F111014111 .op...d th. abe. na.rd .................. ..h M huwrli awd w.t am for Y. atA rl did v7 A. f nwr It he • ................. ...................._..__......__..............a............._............. ........... ..•...... perldr .N' 1 ? ( It the .. ? ,• ....... _:.._-.. ........... ................ ........................ _............. ....... ..... ......... ... r..•.....^.?:.__..._ .....................:.....•............._...............---......_ iixM..HO1ditlaa...IAax_ _... :• cwpo,7tion ....... ............. ..d .el.m..ladesd th. f.ntolnl lmmt. ad shot IM tat .Ifl.d f. rA. 1r.e!Il4F?!Nriwdf i. the act"'oIt ../1 .mat l0 be .............. . ............ IoluN.ry as and ded. at "Id C.Ipa/ation sad Ihaf Yid iNfMldaa ?. ifirrad and failld'Id be. half .r rid earpoma- by aarAarl' ./rtu UM of dincton: 4w each of ow. _td rid *-"nnKAf N a ..Mora.? &.L. • ?I;C7•. !..fora n+:p''' wi.•(r1?'lICIIL (°l'FIf:fAL ..............rr......._----- .___..................?//? 1!r - ?•?4 ., .lK?'?-At•7 SEAL) .tu? P.blic for Ot.daw •.1' .•. ?9t. {' '' Not" Nblk for Or.gon ?'??!''? 2 12-91 Ms mem!L an eap1Mr M7 ..p.v.d.w [aplnat from OF camm H ? OS M[sl!rMol Germ so ......................................................... .. ? .......... .. ....... 1. fiord W. llaew Obt yftd/ at CAW *a" OW .........._....... di?:is? ::.?P::o •.o..... .........._'_..... jy l.a.was sr ti oadtpr- ............................... sad o d .? .. .. . ................................... .....................r.. r......... .l t1l i. •...?vr9 n9 ?. i , C1• .............•.......... i•.?1.a • «t'•.a ?.D•I?• .•. «...... .,. /.d r.ee•.t. • N[ Y awn w.wtua M.+ •n \ : :•C7 ......................._.........................._ .... }1R0-0011 +•.a.an.....a.r UU4 DOC s• 6SO46365 11.00 ftect:. ,19260 10/06/iget- 11:05:05l1M r?_ ...............•.................... Deputy 1 1 1 0 • ATTACHMENT C Pre-Application Conference Notes 1 CITY OF TIGARD [A U 491W 5?? PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ' =-" NON-BESIB MilAL CAM V- STTAM wt ?Q- APPLICALIT: / AGENT: a1 Phone:[ ) Z?1S2-4 5 Phone: t 1 ??13 -0 80S PBOPEBTT LOCATION: ABBBESS: 1376-7 s w PQ 1g ? we,4 Tu MAP/TU LOT: -LS ( e3 7 -ow. ?, 14,0-d MECESSABIr APPUCATION IR 61-re, IPg?r? 1 I l PROPOSAL BstarTIoN: ?Q rt f'a Q u? GNa? l??r t,•. i` t'.? a S a cve. Ga a.a wt?C c ee !r' COMPBEBENiSaVE PLAN BESIGNATIOW 6.e(442 vc ? 41 A" eve),? C G ZONING BESIGNATIONN: A e keva I (!?o w+"ey-dd l (?C 6) CITIZEII WOLVEMENT fACIIRATOIL TEAM ABEk PHONE (5031 'ZONING BISTRICT BIMENSIONAL BEQ EMENiS j,? Minimu lot size: esq. ft. Average lot width: sdft. Maximum building height: ti4 fts? Sed tc? Front ft. Side V ft. Rear '26 ft. Comer ? It/q ft. from street. ' Maximum site coverage: TiK.5% Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: 15 % tseter to Cede Section 18.1 'D bpd- `?03V j0 '*-k1~q 14 tai aeu1? 44d dew vtsl" s ABBRIOMALLOT s IJ OtENWO 117e5 Minimum lot fr nteet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. ' Lots created as partition must h ave a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot 'de access easement. ' The depth of all lots all not exceed 24 times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 14 times the minimum size of the applicable zoning district. [Hater to Code Section 18.1 - Lets] CtiT eF nwe ht-Ap?tlea G¦tenoC011ems Ptge 1 q t aMaon/M?o?t ?uwatsnttn ECIAL SETBACKS ? Streets: Q feet from the centerline of '?7C,O ? Established areas: Mla feet from Lower intensity zones: 'L?6 feet, along the site's boundary. ? Flag lot: 10 fooNde yard setback. [Refer to Code Secdoa sad 18.961 LEM 111IIDIM6 NOW f 60VISIOMS Building Height Exceptions - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided: y(o w, dLK),4q.M l1,e0; W_ a?pAa,< ' ? A maximum building floor area to site a rati6 tFAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; All actual building setbacks will be at least Y2 (half) of the building's height; and ? The structure will not abut a residential zone district. (Ida to Cede Swooa18.98A281 IMMIRANACCESS Required parking for this type of use: Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): Secondary use required parking: Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): M AI of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. Parking staUs sh dimensioned as follows: Standard parki space dimensions: 8 ft. 8 inches X 18 ft. ? Compact parking pace dimensions: 8 ft. X 15 ft. [Beferto Cede oa18.1OU201 ? Handicapped p king: A I parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned d' led person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking pace symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall posted. Bicycle racks are required for multi- mily, commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected om automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle ' parking spaces shall be provided on th basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. ' Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: h Minimum pavement width: ti All driveways and'"', king areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. ' Drive-in use queuing eas: Meter to Cede Secttea 18.106 Wild 18.1081 UfflCAte lh"IFICI N C I Nams Pape 2 d i M1 0 !SOON LUMAYSEQUIREM Walkways shall tend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access an egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commerc 1, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed betwe a new development and neighboring developments. (Refer to Code Secdon 18.108111 ROMINGAREAREM Every commercial industrial building in excess of 10,000 square feet shall be provided with a loading space. The spa ize and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. ' (Refer to Code Secdon Al 901 LUR VISION AREA . The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area ' depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to two Secdon 18.1021 f 9FF MG AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer ' areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or ' fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may Qpty be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. ' meta to ewe Cb"MI .11101 The required buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: ft. along north boundary. ft. along east boundary. ft. along south boundary. ft. along west boundary. In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along LANDSCAPING Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street ' trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be ' obtained from the Planning Division. ?nsweo pr*410ft tlea P Ego re Notes PM 3 et i M?iWMIW Mokoft!!faw"98 -Saco" • 0 A minimum of one (1) tree for every seven (7) parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include ' special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed I information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. [Beier to Code Chapters A100, M06 and 18.1081 Sign permit ust be obtained prior to installation of Sign Permits" andout is available upon request. standards may b ermitted if the sign proposal application. Alternate Y, a Sign Code Exception Hearings Officer. (Beier to Code Section 18: any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Additional sign area or height beyond Code is reviewed as part of a development review application may be filed for review before the SENSIM ' The C%withhii vides regulations for la s which are potentially unsuitable for development due to areas he 100 -year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on nstable ground. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application c ference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely Chapter 18.84 also provides gulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands ' areas. Residential development within floodplaons, U ter to Code Sefte 18.841 SNMSEWBMAGENC SA189FFEB STMURD& B a 0 96-A4 Purpose: ' Land development a cent to sensitive areas shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wi enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. ' Design Criteria: The vegetated corridor shall b a minimum of 25 feet wide, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to ' reduce the width of a portion of t corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the vegeta d corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated corridor at is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable ' encroachment shall be 15 feet, except allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corridor within a development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width of the egetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. 1 ofTMM M41111111 atlM C ON INC 0 MKIM hMe 4 ?t 1 /M as - - i g40utlSR/Raol" 9"Mal t Sao" ' • • Restrictions * egetate Corridor: No structures, d velopment, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, ' dumping of any ma rials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quali protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as allowed below: ' ? A gravel walkway o bike path, not exceeding 8 feet in width. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the veget ed corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path ay not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the 1 sensitive area, unless ap oved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimi disturbance to existing vegetation; and Water quality facilities may enc ach into the. vegetated corridor a maximum of 10 feet with the approval of the Agency or City. ' Location of Vegetated Corridor: In any residential development which ates multiple parcels or lots intended for separate ' ownership, such as a subdivision, the veget ed corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for a construction of a dwelling unit. (Belless 6 s 9 964WIM 6egola m-ChoW3.0 for SINM BNIVALF aif e? A tree pan for the lanting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be ' provided for any lot parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major artition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is pre rred over removal where possible. The tree plan shall includ the following: b Identification of the cation, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as ' significant by the Ci b Identification of a progr m to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation mu it follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the followin standards: Retainage of less th n 25 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program a cording to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; ' ? Retainage of from 25 5D percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the ees to be removed be mitigated according to Section ' 18.150.070.D; ? Retainage of from 50 to 75 percent f existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires ' that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; ' ? Retainage of 75 percent or greater of existi trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ' b Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed, nd ?T1G68 he-Jf?CatlM Cwhnsa Mates page 5 of a rpaoMRtadq Mwntt?ata b A protectio grogram defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to ' protect trees during and after construction. Trees removed withi the period of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will ' be inventoried as p of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.150.070.D. [Beter to code Section 1 50.0251 1MGA11ON Replacement of a tree shall to a place according to the following guidelines: ' ? A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ' ? If a replacement ree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Di ctor may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource alue. ' ? If a replacement t ee of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viabl , the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in ' accordance with the ollowing formula: The number of replaceme t trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated ' caliper size of the tree r oved or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacem nt trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Di ector may require one (1) or more.replacement trees to ' be planted on other property w hin the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ' ? The planting of a replacement tr shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. ' In lieu of tree replacement under Subsection D f this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its co is in performing such tree replacement. [Befer b Bode Section 18.150.070 M li MTiVE ' The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approv standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consid an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. [Refer to Code Section 18.321 SECTIONS 18.80 18.92 18.100 _ 18.108 18.120 _ 18.150 18.84 _ 18.96 18.102 _ 18.114 ? 18.130 _ 18.160 18.88 _ 18.98 18.106 _ 18.116 18.134 162 1188 .164 OTT MFTIGM ft*4X da0a C@O10f a NMS P306018 LACTSTUDY? ?J ication submittal requirements, applicants are required to include impact As a part Na ¦ study with mittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the developmeic facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportat, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water ¦ system, thstem and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system anpact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, in' ize the impact of the development on the public at large, public ¦ facilities sd a ected private property users. In situations where the Community Developmequire the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shal l either ¦ specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real pro rty dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the develo ment. ¦ IBeferto ININ tkaMr1U2,So oA581 When a condition of approval req ' es transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the ¦ approval authority shall adopt finding which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportion to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. ¦ (Referb ft0 MINK 1i ZSeC U2501 ME1680080000 Y?i1116 ' The applicant shall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator an the members of any land use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handou concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting application or the application will not be accepted, [Bowls no 0ei?llum Yeetfog 01111116os1 plicant should contact franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with ¦ Pri sposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. fBefer a SeMn 18.1161 &BMONAL CONCMNS 08 COMBM P886®08E ©k eed 1,4d s ca e. De, r- ?Li Qs ' f 444 t 5 S -Administrative S aff Meview. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. 4od aphr V% ltz e Public hearing before the Planning Commission. ¦ Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. T=M mudko a CaWWft= Nas e d i wove sW, '?? • 0 IPUCATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community ' Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail .QLdropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned, Applicationa will NOT be accented after 3.00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted •-•i*h an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches, One 8.5 inc by 11 inch man, of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or ' administrative decision Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional -copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20 day public appeal period follows ill land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard ?4V Louev'• A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: Be anference and eons cannot aver as Code realremeets and aspects of oood site planing 29 should mlyto the development of your sfte plan Mm of the staff to provide bllermatia re4OW by the Code shall not aesd= a walver of the =Oahle sbodards or regnlremullx It Is recommended that a prove ami ant dMa obtain and read the Commsaft Development Code or ask an goeMos of City staff relative to Code regatreman Prior to submillting an ap0catia. An Additional pre-application fee and conference will be required if an application pertaining to this pre-application conference is submitted after a period of more than six (6) months following this conference (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: iD? CITY OFTIGABD PUMIJIG DIVISION PHONE 15031639-M FAIL- 150316847297 %pattyWast-sweapp-c-st l g Section: mast"Suveapp-c.eng) -Jarr97 tff TWU M411116csda Caterssr- Nabs Ike i st i ap0atlafromft MprdntSecdo ' CITY OF TIGARD CONliNAUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTNIEVT APPLICATION CHECKLIST CITY OF TIGARO ' The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to ' be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted wit*1 all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: wl f3 P 1Q? Date: 7-b/97 1 11APPLIC-\TION & REL-kTED DCCUNiENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT INCLUDE / MARKED ITEMS i A) Application form (1 copy) 6) Owner's signature/written authorization C) Title transfer instrumentlor grant deed D) Applicant's statement E) Filing Fee m? No. of Copies 20 S t. CIS 11 SITE-SPECIFIC MAP(SUPL-WS) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITE.titS I A) Site Information showing: 1. Vicini map 2. Site size & dimensions 3. Contour-in-es (tit at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: (a) Floodplain areas (b) Slopes in excess of 25% (c) Unstable ground (d) Areas with high seasonal water table (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential (f) areas having severely weak foundation soils 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive .slap Inventory including: (a) bVildlife habitats (b) Wetlands 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings (b_)) Trees with 6" = caliper measured 4 feet from ground level .o_c3ti_on or structures and their uses 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources 10. Location of existing utilities and easements, 1 1. Location of existing dedicated ri;ht-of-wavs-- No. of Copies 47-0 I LAASD LSE A "U'CaTICcv / LLST PACE : CF i 6) Site Development Plan _oicatine: ' 3. S . ' 6. ' 3. 9. ' 10. 11. t 12. A of Copies u6 proposed site and surrounding pr-? oc 7?;--, Contour line intervals The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site (c) alternative routes or dead end or proposed streets that require future extension The location and dimension of: (z) Entrances and exits on the site b Parking and circulation areas (c) loading and services area (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation (e) Outdoor common areas (f) Above ground utilities b/ ? C3 ? The oca ion, imensions set ack distances or a (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions Sanitary sewer facilities The location areas to be landscaped The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques The location of mailboxes The location of all structures and their orientation Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements e? C3/ c C) Grading Plan In tin : No. of Copies ' The site development 'an shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis dra ings and shall contain the following information: (a) General cont? ' 1. The location and e\bemiti-areed hich grading will take place indicating: (b) Slope ratios ' (c) Soil stabilizatal(s) ? (d) Approximate for the proposed site development ? 2. A statement from a a ineer supported by data factual ' substantiating: (a) Subsurface exand ge ethnical engineering report ? (b) The validity ose?nrer an storm drainage service proposals ? ' (c) That all proble mitigated d how they will be mitigated ? LANO LSE APPUC,4MON / us7 PACE 2 OF 3 0) Architectural Orawin s dicating: of Copies ZD ' The site development p proposal shall include: I. Floor plans indicating the square fco(age of all strut:urea ' proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings or each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: I. Description of the irrigation system where applicable 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open space s ? 4. Location, type, size and species or existing and proposed plant materials a 3. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions ? (b) Erosion control measures that will be used ? F) Sin Dr in C3 Sion drawl shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 or the Code as of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit t construct a sign. G) Traffic Generation E imate: G H) Preliminary Partition/ of Line Adiustment May Indicatin : No. of Copies 1. The owner or the s jest parcel ? 2. The owner's authoriz agent ? 3. The map scale (20,50,1 or 200 feet -1) inch north arrow and date ? -t. Description of parcel locati and boundaries c 3. Location, width and names or treets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the arcel ? 6. Location of all permanent buiidin on and within 23 feet of all property lines 7. Location and width of all water tour- s ? S. Location of anv trees within 6" or Brea r caliper at : feet above ;round level 9. All slopes greater than 2300 ? 0. Location or existing utilities and utility ease eats ? 1 .. For major land partition which creates a pub street: (a) The proposed right-or-way location and 'th ? (b) A scaled cross-section of the proposed stree plus any reserve strip c 12. Any applicable deed restrictions a 3. Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ? _1r0 Lsi +PoL::CiaiCr/ UST PACi 3 CF 5 Subdivision Preiimin. Plat Ala and Data Indicatin : -No. of Copies • 1. Scale equaling 30 00,100 or 200 ;eet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet 2. The proposed nam or the subdivision c I Vicinity map showi g property's relationship to arterial and collector streets C -4. Names, addresses d teiephone numbers or the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer nd designer (as applicable) ? 3. Date or application ? 6. Boundary lines or tr ct to be subdivided ? Names or adjacent s bdivision or names of recorded owners or adjoining parcels or u -subdivided land ? 8. Contour lines related to City-established benchmark at 2-foot intervals for 0-1000 grades ;realer an 10 .0 ? 9. The purpose, location, type nd size or ail the following (within and adjacent to the proposed sub ivision): (a) Public and private right =ways and easements ? (b) Public and private sanita and storm sewer lines ? (c) Domestic water mains in uding fire hydrants ? (d) -Major power telephone tr nsmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ? (e) Watercourses ? (f) Deed reservations for par , open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ? 10. Approximate plan and profilesiof proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ? 11. Plan of the proposed water dis ribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location or valves and fire ydrants o 12. approximate centerline profiles bowing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions fora asonable distance beyond the limits or the proposed subdivision 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed st et right-of-way(s) ? 14. The location of all areas subject to in dation or storm water overflow ? 15. Location, width & direction or flow of I water courses & drainage-ways ? 16. The proposed lot configurations, approxi ate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used ror purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such kOots. ? 17. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at feet above ;round level, and the location'or proposed tree plantings 13. The existing uses or the property, including the location or all structures and the present uses or the structures, and a statement or which structures are to remain after platting ? 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) `, ? (b) Proof of property ownership ? (c) a proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ? 20. Existing natural features including rcck outc:ocoings, wetlands & marsh areas ? 21. If any or the foregoing information cannot practicabl'. be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application c 1 U`Q %.SE I L'S; ?ACE 4 CF 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I) Solar Access C culatio* K) Other iniormation `r"0 ao l?Lv2f>S Co K! ev?t S ?i ??? Q y 60 Q l'a?s'P.o? ?o,? , 0 No. of Copies C I Keavf 5 d .2 / dN. r K *' Lp M eej ' , a w) Q vn s ?7j ' G .e% S ? o u Id L ?, G GC(C P(? 1 h i/1 Q (?i/a d2 ?-d tcYS K 2eI??P? h::ogi&,Patti'masaers Jdc:i$L:n$t mav :7. 1993 ?.\C= 5 CF 5 1 1 1 1 ATTACHMENT D Photograph of a Similar Installation 1 • 1 1 • w ?"?•` + ! 7 L s ? ' r?k ? ? ? _ . i •. ? ? a ? lL •t ?.Y r.1•! X lp ? ' i .i Y 7 ? ?? i 3 ! . r 'l .r { ? ij ? ? ?t•+"' fir' . M t - Y??•.'y ? 011 ?y Lit, A J ? ? Q r 1 t i AGENDA ITEM NO. ?- 0 0 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY. JULY 7, 1997 AT Z= PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO(S): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 91-0005 VARIANCE (VAR] 91-0003 FILE TITLE: AT & T MONOPOLE TOWER APPLICANT: AT &.T Wireless Services OWNER: David & Christine Hammond 1600 SW Fourth Avenue 3015 SW 116th Avenue Portland, OR 97201 Beaverton, OR 97005 REPRESENTATIVE: Mike Bimdorf, Project Manager W & H Pacific . 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97008-7120 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 50-foot tall cellular communications monopole tower and related equipment structure. A Variance has also been requested to the develpment standard requiring paved access to the leasehold area. LOCATION: 12562 SW Main Street; WCTM2S102AC, Tax Lot 01101. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The CBD zoning district provides for a concentrated, central commercial office, and retail area which also provides civic, high density residential, and mixed uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.134. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 6842772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. CUP 97-0005/VAR 97-0003 AT & T MONOPOLE TOWER NOTICE OF 7/7/97 PUBLIC HEARING CITY Of TIGARD Community <Deve&pment ShapingA Better Community ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT Wli (ZEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER JUNE 16. 1997, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25c) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25c) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MARK ROBERTS AT (503) 639-4171, I'IGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. CUP 97-00051VAR 97-0003 AT & T MONOPOLE TOWER NOTICE OF 7!7197 PUBLIC HEARING 0 9 ORIGINAL COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684.0360 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising *City of Tigard • ? Tearsheet Notice 13125 SW Hall Blvd. •Tigard,Oregon 97223 • ? Duplicate Affidavit *Accounts Payable AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss. I, Kathy Snyder being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of theyigard-Tualatin TX mes a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at Ti garr3 in the aforesaid county and state; that the Hearing-AT&T klonopole Tower (SW Alain) a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and consecutive in the following issues: June 26,1997 Subscribed and sworn toefore me this26f-h Ca?,_nf 11113P,1997 Legal Notice TT 8 8 6 8 RECEIVED JUL 0 2 1991 CITY OF TIGARD The following will be considered by the Tigard Hearings Officer o , Monday, July 7, 1997 at 7:00 P.M., at Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. Both public, oral and written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal Code, and rules and procedures of the Hearings Officer. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to allow the hearings authority and all parties to respond precludes an appeal, and failure to specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division at 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223 or by calling (503) 639-4171. PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 97.00051 VARIANCE (VAR) 97.0003 AT & T MONOPOLE TOWER The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 50-foot tall cellular communications monopole tower and related equipment structure. A Variance has also been requested to the development standard requiring paved access to the leasehold area. LOCATION: 12562 SW Main Street; WCTM2S102AC, Tax Lot 01101. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The CBD zoning district provides for a concentrated, central commercial office, and retail area which also provides civic, high density residential, and mixed uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.96,18.100,18.102, 18.106, and 18.134. (l_ OFFICIAL SEAL Not Public for Oregon ROBIN A. BURGESS NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My Commission Expires: #COMMISSION NO. 062071 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 16, 2001 AFFIDAVIT. . . TT8868 - Publish June 26, 1997. • CITY ? OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER CITY OF TIGARD Community ingA Better Community I SIGN-IN SHEET Q Shap NOTICE: ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN TNEIR NAME AND RECORD TNEIR ADDRESS ON THIS SNEET ................(Please PRINT Lealbhll AGENDA ITEM #: I 2.2 F DATE OF HEARING: 7/7/97 Page 1 of FILE NAME(S): ---T AT&T MONOPOLE TOWER CASE NUMBER(S): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 97-0005 OWNER(S) David & Christine Hammond APPLICANT(S): AT & T Wireless Services PROJECT LOCATION: 12565 SW Main Street MAP(S) & TAX LOT(S) NO(S). I FWCTM 2S102AC, TAX LOT 01101. PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME, ADDRESS, AND INCLUDE YOUR ZIP CODE PROPONENT (For the proposal) OPPONENT (Against the proposal) -?(Prlnt Name/AP'_/c?z ddress/np a ANNIetloN (Print Name/Addr =ft aANilletlonl Name: V iF? Name: 000 z o Address: !6®0 mw 41?40? Address: ?2!9! & CV R 0-0( V4?- Citv: P072-7-L4" State: n/C. Zin: ?7.P.6) City <. C t e'%Lei gtnfim. 7in- Address: !5 ? C,.,2 Ali"C Address: City: State: e? Zip: 9v;??Qftity• State: Zip: Name: Name: Address: Address: City: State: Zip: City: State: Zip: hApattylmasterslsigninho.mst CITY OF TIGARD Community (Development ShapingA Better Community CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER c* BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Number(s): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 97-0005 VARIANCE (VAR) 97-0003 Case Name(s): AT & T MONOPOLE TOWER Name of Owner: David & Christine Hammond Name of Applicant: AT & T Wireless Services Address of Applicant: 1600 SW Fourth Avenue City: Portland State: Oregon Zip: 97201 Address of Property: 12562 SW Main Street City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97223 Tax Map & Lot No(s).: WCTM 2S102AC, Tax Lot 01101. Request-? The City of Tigard Hearing's Officer has approved a request to develop a 50-foot-tall cellular communications monopole tower and related equipment structures. A Variance has also been approved to the development standard requiring paved access to the leasehold area to minimize development within 25 feet of the top of the bank of Fanno Creek. The access drive will be situated within that 25-foot-wide buffer area. Zone: Central Business District; CBD. The CBD zoning district provides for a concentrated, central commercial office, and retail area which also provides civic, high density residential, and mixed uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.66, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130 and 18.134. ACtion: -? ? Approval as requested 9 Approval with conditions ? Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: O Owners of record within the required distance 9 Affected governmental agencies • The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator O The applicant and owner(s) Huai Decision: % HE DECISION SMALL 'BE FINAL ON FRIDAY IULT25,.1991 UNLESS AN APPEA11S FRED. T The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $1,745.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of $500.00. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 330 ,P.M. ON JULY 25,1991. Quesdons: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003 AT & T MONOPOLE TOWER NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARING'S OFFICER 0 0 BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application for a conditional use permit and a) F I N A L O R D E R variance for a 50-foot tall tower for cellular telephone ) CUP 97-0005 antennas and an accessory structure in the CBD zone at ) VAR 97-0003 12562 SW Main Street in'the City of Tigard, Oregon ) (AT&T Wireless) 1. SUMMARY 1. The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit for a 50-foot tall tower that will support flush-mounted antennas for cellular telephone services and a related 12-foot x 28-foot equipment building and associated development. The proposed tower and building will be situated in a roughly 3000-square foot leased area behind (south of) a commercial building on the 0.63-acre parcel. A sight-obscuring fence is proposed to enclose the tower and accessory building. Existing vegetation will be retained outside the fenced area. The applicant will place gravel over the remainder of the fenced area. 2. The applicant proposes to provide vehicular access between the site and SW Main Street through the existing parking lot on the site. The existing parking lot is paved to a point about 90 feet from the proposed tower location; beyond that point, the applicant proposes to improve the access with gravel. Tigard Community Development Code (CDC) 18.108.080 requires access and parking to be paved. The applicant requests a variance to that requirement to minimize development within 25 feet of the top of the bank of Fanno Creek. The access drive will be situated within that 25-foot wide buffer area. 3. A duly noticed public hearing was held to review the application. City staff recommended approval. The applicant accepted the staff recommendation without objections. No one else appeared at the hearing orally or in writing. The hearings officer approves the conditional use permit as provided herein. II. BASIC FACTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE The hearings officer incorporates by reference the findings about the site and surroundings in Sections III and IV of the City of Tigard Staff Report dated June 27, 1997 (the "Staff Report"), and the staff and agency comments in Sections V and VI of the Staff Report. III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS The applicable approval standards are identified in Section IV of the Staff Report. IV. HEARINGS AND RECORD 1. Hearings Officer Larry Epstein (the "hearings officer") received testimony at the public hearing about this application on July 7, 1997. The hearings officer closed the public record at the conclusion of the hearing. The testimony is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and Exhibit C (Written Testimony). These exhibits are filed at the Tigard City Hall. 2. At the hearing, city planner Mark Roberts summarized the Staff Report. The applicant's representatives, Mike Birndorf and Jeff Penick, accepted the Staff Report without objections or corrections. Mr. Birndorf noted that the applicant intends to install a sight-obscuring fence around the ground-mounted equipment rather than adding landscaping. No one else appeared orally or in writing or by representative. Hearings Officer Final Order CUP 97-00051VAR 97-0003 (AT&T Main Street) Page 1 • • V. EVALUATION OF REQUEST City staff recommended approval of the conditional use permit and variance based on the findings in Section IV of the Staff Report. No one disputed those findings. The hearings officer concludes the findings in Section IV of the Staff Report accurately reflect the law and the facts. The hearings officer adopts and incorporates those findings as his own, with the following additions: 1. The applicant modified the proposal at the hearing in this matter to substitute a sight-obscuring fence for the proposed landscaping shown on the site plan in the application. Although CDC 18.100.110(A) encourages use of landscaping for screening and buffering, a sight-obscuring fence also is permitted for that purpose. In this case a sight-obscuring fence provides adequate screening and buffering provided it surrounds the ground-mounted equipment on all sides (except where the facility abuts a building). a. It was not clear from the testimony that the applicant intends to fence the west side of the facility site. The hearings officer finds the west side of the site should be improved with a sight-obscuring fence or landscaping to buffer and screen the site from view from the residential area further west and southwest of the site. Although the residential uses do not abut the site, they are only one lot removed. Also the residential units are at a higher elevation than the site and will look down on the site. These facts about the location and topography of the site and land in the vicinity warrant buffering and screening on the west side of the site under CDC 18.120.180(A)(4). 2. Pursuant to CDC 18.130.040, a conditional use must comply with CDC 18.120.180 (Site Development Review). Based on CDC 18.120.180(A)(4), the hearings officer finds that the tower should not incorporate any advertising or signage and should not be lighted except as required by the Federal Communications Commission or other applicable agency or as approved by the planning director for security or safety purposes. 3. Pursuant to CDC 18.130.040, a conditional use must comply with the applicable policies of the comprehensive plan. The hearings officer finds the land use policies promote efficient use of land resources and minimization of adverse land use impacts from development. The hearings officer further finds that it makes more efficient use of land and reduces potential adverse impacts of a telecommunications facility to have multiple users share a tower rather than to build new towers. Therefore the hearings officer concludes the applicant should be required to allow antennas for other telecommunications service providers to be situated on the proposed tower and to allow associated transmission equipment to be situated in the proposed accessory building on the site if the tower and/or building can accommodate such additional antennas and equipment or can be modified to do so; provided, the applicant may require such shared user to pay all costs associated with such shared use as a condition of such shared use; provided further, such modification to the conditional use should be subject to applicable review by the city. The applicant shall respond promptly and in good faith to any inquiry regarding shared use of the tower site. 4. The hearings officer finds a communications tower such as proposed in this case has inherently adverse visual impacts. Those impacts are unavoidable for a working communications facility. But, if the facility is abandoned or its use is otherwise terminated, the adverse visual impacts of the facility can be eliminated by removing the tower. Therefore the hearings officer finds the applicant should be required to remove the tower within a reasonable time after the facility is abandoned or its use is otherwise terminated. The hearings officer fmds the facility is abandoned, among other reasons, if all antennas are removed from the tower or are not operated for at least six months. The tower shall be removed within 90 days of abandonment. Hearings Oyicer Final Order CUP 97-00051VAR 97-0003 (AT&T Main Street) Page 2 • • VI. CONCLUSION AND DECISION 1. Based on the findings adopted and incorporated herein, the hearings officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit complies with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code, subject to applicable laws and conditions of approval warranted to address the potential impacts of the conditional use. 2. In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and other reports of affected public agencies and testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the hearings officer hereby approves CUP 97-0005 and VAR 97-0003, subject to the following conditions: a. Before the city issues a building permit for the proposed tower, the applicant shall submit a site plan to the planning director for review and approval. (1) The site plan shall identify where one (1) off-street parking space will be provided for the communications facility. (2) The site plan shall show where and what fencing, landscaping or other permitted method of screening will buffer the ground-mounted equipment and parking area on the communications facility site. Screening shall be provided on the east, south and west sides of the communications facility site (i.e., on all sides except abutting the commercial building north of the communications facility site). The applicant shall maintain the approved screening in perpetuity as long as the applicant uses the site for a communications facility. (3) If lighting is proposed for security or safety purposes, the site plan shall show all such lighting, subject to condition of approval b. b. The tower shall not incorporate any advertising, signage, or lighting except as required by the Federal Communications Commission or other applicable agency with jurisdiction; provided, the planning director may approve lighting deemed necessary for security and safety purposes; provided further, permitted lighting shall be designed, situated and/or operated to minimize its off-site impacts. c. The applicant shall allow antennas for other telecommunications service providers to be situated on the proposed tower and shall allow associated transmission equipment to be situated in the proposed accessory building on the site if the tower and/or building can accommodate such additional antennas and equipment or can be modified to do so; provided, the applicant may require such shared user to pay all costs associated with such shared use as a condition of such shared use; provided further, such modification to the conditional use should be subject to applicable review by the city. The applicant shall respond promptly and in good faith to any inquiry regarding shared use of the tower site. d. The applicant shall remove the tower within 90 days after the communications facility is abandoned or its use is otherwise terminated. The facility is presumed to be abandoned if all of the antennas are removed from the tower or are not operated for at least six consecutive months. Hearings Ofcer Final Order CUP 97-00051VAR 97-0003 (AT&T Main Street) Page 3 • • "EXHIBIT A" -- PARTIES OF RECORD (Written Public Testimony received at the hearing) • • "EXHIBIT B" -- TAPED PROCEEDINGS (Verbal recording of hearing including public, staff and Hearings Officer communications.) NOTE: Tapes are located in the Records Vault, Planning Section. • i "EXHIBIT C" -- WRITTEN TESTIMONY (Applicant's materials and pertinent correspondence filed with Hearings Officer prior to Public Hearing.) • Agenda Item: 12 Hearing Date: July 7,1997 Time: 7:00 PM SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: AT & T MONOPOLE TOWER Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97-0005 Variance (VAR) 97-0003 PROPOSAL: 1. The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval for a 50-foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and associated equipment structures. 2. The applicant has also requested Variance approval to eliminate the requirement for a paved surface to the proposed communications facility. APPLICANT: AT & T Wireless Services OWNER: David & Christine Hammond 1600 SW Fourth Avenue 3015 SW 116th Avenue Portland, OR 97201 Beaverton, OR 97005 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Central Business District; CBD. ZONING DESIGNATION: Central Business District; CBD. LOCATION: 12562 SW Main Street; WCTM 2S102AC, Tax Lot 01101. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.66, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130 and 18.134. SECTION II: STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff. recommends that the Hearing's Officer find 'that the proposed Conditional Use Permit;! and Variance will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the following recommended conditions of approval: . STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003 - AT & T MONOPOLE PAGE 1 OF 11 • • 1. The applicant shall modify the proposed site and/or landscape plan to provide one (1) paved, off-street parking space for the service vehicle. 2. The applicant shall provide fencing, landscaping, or other permitted method of screening of the ground mounted equipment. The screening shall be provided to the west, south, and east of the leasehold area. The applicant shall maintain the screening materials that are provided in perpetuity. SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The property is developed with a general retail building that is occupied by a paint store use. The City has no record of any other more recent development applications having been filed for this property. Vicinity Information: To the north of the leasehold area is the existing paint store retail building. To the south is a portion of the Main Street Apartments and vacant areas that are part of the Fanno Creek floodplain area. To the west of this parcel is the main portion of the Main Street Apartment property. To the east is the A-Boy property. Site Information and Proposal Description: The northerly portion of the site is presently developed with a retail building. A paved driveway area to the east of the building. The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 50-foot tall cellular communications tower facility and related equipment structures. A Variance to the requirement for paved access to the proposed communications facility has also been requested. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003 - AT & T MONOPOLE PAGE 2 OF 11 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL • • SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Impact Study: Section 18.32.050 states the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Alternatively, an applicant may specifically concur with the requirement for dedication of right-of-way to the public and waive the impact study analysis by dedicating the right-of-way and completion of a waiver statement. Section 18.120.180(A)(8) requires right-of-way dedication for properties that are contiguous with the 100-year floodplain. Because the dedication of public right-of-way does not appear to be roughly proportional to the impact of the proposed unmanned utility facility this dedication requirement has not been recommended. Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build a 50 foot cellular monopole. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as a utility. Code Section 18.66 lists utilities as a conditionally permitted use in the Central Business Zoning District. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.66 states that there is no minimum lot size requirements. Developments within the Central Business Zoning District are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. Landscaping a minimum of 15% of the site would require a total of 4,125 square feet landscaping on this 27,500 square foot site. The site does not appear to have any existing formally developed landscaping. However, wetlands or other natural areas have previously been permitted to be considered part of the required landscape percentage when they are part of the subject property. Approximately 17,270 square feet of the site is within the Fanno Creek floodplain area and wetlands, or within the 25-foot buffer area. The applicant has provided a proposed landscape plan for the overall site but not specifically for the leasehold area. The plan provides new landscaping for a total of approximately 485 square feet of previously unimproved portions of the site. Within the narrative, the applicant states that a minimum of 15% of the leasehold area will be provided with landscaping to comply with the requirement. The site and landscape plan and the applicants' narrative do not make it clear if the new landscaping that is shown to be provided is to upgrade the overall site or as screening for the ground mounted equipment. Because the site has no formally developed landscaping, it is suggested that the proposed landscaping be provided except where these areas are within the required 25-foot wetlands buffer. In these areas, re-establishment of native riparian corridor plantings is suggested. It is recommended that the Hearing's Officer find that because an area of approximately 17,270 square feet of the site is within Fanno Creek or the 25-foot wetlands buffer, that the proposed additional impervious surfaces do not cause the site to exceed the maximum landscape percentage for the site. For this reason, landscaping a portion of the new leasehold area does not appear to be required. Screening of the ground mounted equipment in this area through the use of fencing or landscaping has been recommended as a Condition of Approval. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003 - AT & T MONOPOLE PAGE 3 OF 11 • Setback: Section 18.66.050 states that there is no front yard or side yard setback facing the street. No side and rear yard setbacks are required except; a minimum of 20 feet shall be required where a commercial use abuts a residential zoning district. The site does not adjoin a zoning district that is specifically designated for residential use. The Central Business Zoning District does permit residential use as one (1) of the allowed use types. For this reason, it appears reasonable to apply this standard to adjoining properties that are developed for residential use. The subject property does not directly adjoin properties that are developed with residential uses. For this reason the proposed monopole complies with this standard. Building Height Limitations - Exceptions: Section 18.98.020 states that any building located in a non-residential zoning district shall not exceed a height of 75 feet subject to certain criteria. Section 18.98.010 exempts structures that are not intended for human habitation. The proposed cellular monopole is not intended for human habitation and is exempt from the height requirement as provided under Section 18.98.010. Street Trees: Section 18.100.035 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large), with a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height. The existing retail building was not developed with street trees. It is recommended that this section not be found to be applicable to this proposal. The proposed leasehold area does not have direct frontage on a Public Street. The existing site improvements are not made more non-conforming through the development of a new cellular communications use. Therefore, this determination is consistent with the Non-Conforming Structure provisions of Section 18.132.040 (C). Screening Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Recently it has been determined that because monopole facilities require a maintenance vehicle to access the site periodically, that a minimum of one (1) off-street parking space needs to be provided or proof that existing off-street parking exceeds minimum standards. Based on the plan and existing site constraints, it appears that the existing retail use is deficient in off-street parking and that the only areas available for this purpose are near the proposed leasehold area. Because these areas are primarily behind the existing building, the parking space will be screened. In the event that the applicant is to construct a new space for this purpose elsewhere that is visible from SW Main Street, the parking lot screening provisions would then apply. Because one (1) new parking space would be required, other parking lot landscape provisions are not applicable to this request. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003 - AT & T MONOPOLE PAGE 4 OF 11 • • Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30-foot distance points with a straight line. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, signs, temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The height is measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. The applicant has not proposed to construct improvements that exceed the aforementioned height within the Clear Vision areas. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030 does not specify a minimum parking ratio requirement for an unmanned utility use such as the proposed cellular communications monopole. The applicant states that periodically a maintenance vehicle will need to access the facility. The applicant has not provided parking to serve this development. Because the applicant states that a maintenance vehicle will be at the site, one (1) parking space has previously been required for this type of use. For this reason, the site and/or landscape plan shall be revised to provide one (1) additional off- street parking space. Access: Section 18.108.080 states that commercial and industrial uses that require less than 100 parking spaces provide one (1) access with a minimum width of 30-feet, and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. This use requires a single monthly maintenance inspection, therefore, two-way access is not needed for the portion of the property that would provide access to this facility. For this reason, no specific access width is required for this use. The applicant has also requested a variance to paving any access to this facility due to current wetlands buffer standards. The applicant states that the Fire District reviewed this application and states that paved access is only required within 150 feet of the proposed facility. A paved driveway area onto the site currently exists. Through the Building Permit Fire and Life Safety Review, the required fire vehicle access to the facility (as noted in the Agency Comment portion of this report) will need to be addressed prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Sections 18.66, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130, and 18.134. The proposal's consistency with these Sections are reviewed within this staff report. Site Development Review - Additional Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(2- 18) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180(A)(2) (Tree Removal), 18.120.180.(A)(3) (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.(A)(5) (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.(A)(6) (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.(A)(7) (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.(A)(9) (Demarcation of Spaces), 18.120.180.(A)(12) (Public Transit), 18.120.180.(A)(17) (Signs) and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005/VAR 97-0003 - AT & T MONOPOLE PAGE 5 OF 11 • • standards. Section 18.120.180.(A)(18) requires that other applicable provisions of the underlying zone be addressed. These sections are addressed elsewhere within this report. THE FOLLOWING SUBSECTIONS ARE FOUND TO BE APPLICABLE FROM SECTION 18.120.180(A)(2 -18): (4), (8), (10), (11), (13), (14), (15) and (16), and are addressed immediately below. Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses: Section 18.120.180.(A)(4) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. The applicant's proposal did not indicate specific screening materials that would be utilized around the proposed fenced leasehold area. It is recommended that the applicant provide a screening plan that utilizes one of the approved types of screening materials to screen the ground mounted equipment. Due to its 50-foot height and its communications purpose, it is not possible to screen the entire facility and still allow the necessary clear line of site to the antennae structure. The monopole itself has not been designed to attract attention due to its proposed neutral gray color and unobtrusive antennae panels that would be in line with the monopole itself. Section 18.120.180.(A)(4) also states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The applicant has proposed to screen ground mounted equipment through the use of new landscape plantings. Open Space Dedication: Section 18.120.180.(A)(8) states that where development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions within at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted bicycle/pedestrian pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle plan. Because the proposed development is for an unmanned utility use, dedication of adjoining 100-year floodplain areas is not roughly proportional to the impact of the development. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.180.(A)(10) requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The Police Department reviewed this application and had no comments or concerns with this development, as proposed. Access: Section 18.120.180.(A)(11) requires compliance with the access standards set forth in Section 18.108. The applicable site access provisions are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Parking: Section 18.120.180.(A)(13) requires compliance with the Off-Street Parking Standards set forth in Section 18.106. The applicable Off-Street Parking standards of Section 18.106 are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Landscapin. Section 18.120.180.(A)(14) requires compliance with the Landscape provisions of Section 18.100. The applicable Landscape standards are reviewed elsewhere within this report. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003 - AT & T MONOPOLE PAGE 6 OF 11 • • Drainage: Section 18.120.180.(A)(15) requires compliance with the surface water runoff standard of the 1981 Master Plan. Based on the limited increased runoff that is expected, no specific new drainage structures have been recommended by the Engineering Department. Provisions for the Handicapped: Section 18.120.180.(A)(16) requires compliance with the handicapped accessibility standards of ORS Chapter 487. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the City will review the proposal for compliance with all applicable handicapped accessibility standards. Conditional Use: Section 18.130.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. 6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The use, as proposed, complies with all site development standards set forth for the Central Business District. The property is physically separated from existing residential development due to its location. Fencing, landscaping, and existing development around the leasehold area will partially screen the proposed monopole and fully screen the ground mounted equipment from view. The applicant has not requested that public facilities be made available to serve this development. as proposed. All applicable standards of the zoning district are met by this proposal, as reviewed within this staff report. Traffic will not be routed through local streets to access this facility. The antenna facility will not generate substantial traffic, light, or other impacts because the facility will be an unstaffed utility site. The development of this facility will not generate large scale construction impacts due to the type of improvements that are planned. The site will also not require a parking lot. The applicant has also proposed to blend the antenna into the area and reduce the visual impact of the antenna. The antenna itself is described in the applicant's submittal as being a metal pole with antennas which are not expected to draw attention to the structure. No other unique, natural features have been noted on this site. The small leased area requires no significant grading or engineering to develop the site, as proposed. The applicant has not proposed to develop a site larger than needed for the proposed use, leaving remaining underdeveloped portions of the property for future redevelopment. The STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003 - AT & T MONOPOLE PAGE 7 OF 11 • • specific development criteria of the Comprehensive Plan that addresses the development of this type of utility facility are contained within the adopted Community Development Code. The applicable development standards are addressed within this report. Variance: Section 18.134.050 allows approval, or approval with conditions, a request for a Variance. The applicant has requested a Variance from Section 18.106.050 (J) that requires all areas for vehicle maneuvering to be paved with an asphalt or concrete surface. The applicant has proposed to gravel the driveway that would provide access to the proposed monopole facility. A Variance to a development standard may be approved where the following findings can be made: The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, be in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to any other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; Due to its limited nature, the proposed driveway pavement material variance does not appear to be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title. The proposed variance is also, not in conflict with specific policies of the Comprehensive Plan. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size, shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; Due to the narrow width available around the side yard of this property, it does not appear possible to locate the leasehold area at the end of the existing paved area and still provide access to the rear portion of the subject parcel. Locating the monopole and the related equipment would also be an encroachment into the wetlands buffer. Because access to this facility would usually only be needed once or twice a month, a paved surface to the leasehold area would rarely be used. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting some economic use of the land; The Variance is necessary due to the Unified Sewerage Agency standards that limit development within 25 feet of a wetlands. The Variance would not allow a use that is not permitted in the Central Business Zoning District. The Variance allows limited economic use of a smaller undeveloped portion of an existing commercially developed property. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified by this title; and The variance allows the applicant to avoid constructing a new paved driveway within an environmentally sensitive area, to an unmanned utility use that requires only periodic access. The nature of the variance is limited such that no traffic, drainage, land forms, or parks will be affected by this change. By its nature, the proposed variance will allow additional limited use of the site, while complying with current standards for screening and buffering from a wetlands corridor. Due to the location of existing paved areas, it appears possible to comply with Fire and Life Safety standards while not constructing the required paved access. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003 - AT & T MONOPOLE PAGE 8 OF 11 • 0 The hardship is not self imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance that would alleviate the hardship. The hardship is not self imposed in that site constraints such as the developed nature of the property, its size and shape, and the limited need for access of this proposed facility dictate the limited need for construction of a driveway. The current wetlands buffer standards were adopted in 1991, years after the existing retail building was developed. Because limited maintenance vehicle access is all that is required to this type of facility. the variance provides relief from a development standard of limited importance given the type of proposed use. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Engineering Department has reviewed the street and public utility needs for this site. Because this facility will not directly adjoin a public street, no conditions of approval have been recommended concerning street or sidewalk improvements. Because the applicant has also not proposed to extend other utility services to the site, no conditions have been recommended concerning the provision of public utilities. The Building Division has reviewed this request and provided the following comment: A Building Permit is required for all fences, towers, and walls in excess of six (6) feet in height. No other comments or objections have been received. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue has reviewed this request and has provided the following comments: Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. An approved turnaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet. (UFC Sec. 902.2.1). When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, the requirements for fire apparatus access many be modified as approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 902.2.1 Exception 1). Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet (15 feet for not more than two dwelling units), and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.1). Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than 12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 50,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight). (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.2). STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003 - AT & T MONOPOLE PAGE 9 OF 11 • • Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of supporting such loading. Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the finished construction is in accordance with the approved plans or the requirements of the Fire Code. The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall not be less than 25 feet and 45 feet respectfully, as measured from the same center point. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.3). Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved turnaround. Diagrams of approved turnarounds are available from the fire district. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.4). Fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed an average grade of 10 percent with a maximum grade of 15 percent for lengths of more than 200 feet. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.6). Intersections and turnarounds shall be level (maximum 5%) except for crowning for water run-off. Where fire apparatus access roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked vehicles, "No Parking" signs shall be installed on one or both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4). Signs shall read "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE - TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS 98.810" and shall be installed with a clear space above ground level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have black or red letters and border on a white background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.(1)(2) & (3)). Fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.2). The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire flow prior to giving any credits for fire protection systems. There shall not be less than one (1) fire hydrant for the first 2,000 gallons per minute (GPM) required fire flow and one (1) additional fire hydrant for each 1,000 GPM or portion thereof over 2,000 GPM. Fire hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the building and their locations shall be approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1). No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the building and along an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1). Fire hydrants shall not be located more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec 903.4.2.4). The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's office. (UFC Sec. 903.3). STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003 - AT & T MONOPOLE PAGE 10 OF 11 0 0 Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC Sec. 8704). No other comments or objections have been received. PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP Associate Planner APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff Planning Manager i:curpln/markr/cup97-05. rep June 27. 1997 DATE June 27, 1997 DATE STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003 - AT & T MONOPOLE PAGE 11 OF 11 0 Sr - ST I 4-+ S o sr (D sr !EC C ?y Cu 0 . moo CY) O c? i wid-Ril map N CUP 97-0005MAR 97-0003 Note: Map is not to scale A AT & T Monopole Tower LANDSCAPE AREA-80 SF r 5' 12SET8, GK ? G PLOT PLAN EXHIBIT MAP 0 ?J KEYNOTES. 1. II'-6' X 21'-9' PREFABRICATED EQl IPMENT SHELTER 2. 50'-0' MONOPOLE TOWER W/ 3 ANTENNAS. (TOWER FOOTING DESIGN BY OTHE? S). 3. GRAVEL YARD. 4. LEASED AREA PROPERTY LINE. ff? BE DEV 5. FANNO CREEK I 6. TOP OF BANK 1. 5'-0' SQUARE CONC. PAD. HANDRgIL NOT REQUIRED PER MC, SECTION 3306. (a) EXCE ION. 8. EXISTING FENCE. a WAVEGUIDE. \ 10. GRAVEL PARKING AREA WITH (2) 51-0 ?5. DSCAPE AREA=80 SF. DSCAfk AREA-225 S.F. a I .4 W 0 Z Z Z a J c t? V L' O E-- V CASE NO. A.T. & T Monopole Main Street Site CUP 97- 0005 VAR 97- 0003 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • Conditional Use Permit Application for the Downtown Tigard Cellular Site A Proposal Submitted to the City of Tigard Prepared for AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. 1600 SW 4th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97201 Prepared by W&H Pacific 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, Oregon 97008-7120 April 17, 1997 1 1 CITY OF TIGARD • CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION Prc ,. -.y Address/Location(s): 12562 SW Main Street 1 Tigard, OR 1 Tax Map & Tax Lot #(s): T2S-RIW-102AC 1101 Site Size: ,63 Acres ' Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)': David & Christine Hammond Address: 3015 SW 116th Ave. Phone: ' City: Beaverton, OR Zip: 97005 Applicant': AT&T Wireless Services Att: Real Estate Mgr. (w-t,+ PA L IR-) Address: 1600 SW 4th Ave. Phone: oz(n-o4F5S City: Portland, OR Zip: 97201 Rep: M1 Ke gir(MorpW&H Pacific, 8405 SW Nimbus, Beavert V1+nen the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. 1 PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request Conditional Use approval to allow (please be specific): construct a 50' tall monopole and equipment building for cellular 1 communications. 1 PRE-APP. HELD WITH: M)3 112,e DATE OF PRE-APP.: 2 Case No.(s): Other Case No.(s): Receipt No.: Application Accepted By: Date: Date Determined To Be Complete: Comp Plan/Zone Designation: T Area: Rev. &TSM I:kvrVnknas1e s%cua.dx REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS ? Application Elements Submitted: Application Form p' Owner's SignatureANritten Authorization p' Title Transfer Instrument or Deed []? Site/Plot Plan (81h"x 11 (# of copies based on pre-app check list) [Ij' Applicant's Statement (# of copies based on pre-app check list) [? Filing Fee $1,615.00 • • List any VARIANCE, SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: v4xIANCc TD 7,4 VIZ f/PCFSS /?,r&. Ca?vr rie•?A L 4-SrC F&e c/S"E APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject Rroperty. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this day of 19 See attached - Owner authorization Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • Table of Contents 1. PROPOSAL SUMMARY INFORMATION ............................... 1 H. INTRODUCTION ....................................................2 Background on Cellular Communications .................................... 2 Proposed Cellular Facility: Responding to Demand ............................ 2 III. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION .......................................... 3 Site Description ...................................................... 3 IV. REQUESTED LAND USE REVIEWS .................................... 3 V. RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA ...... 3 Compliance with Community Development Code ............................. 3 Site Development Review .............................................. 7 VL RESPONSE TO CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA ......................... 9 VII. RESPONSE TO VARIANCE CRITERIA ................................ 11 VIII. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ....................................... 14 RF Design/Collocation Issues ............................................ 14 Neighborhood Meeting ................................................14 IX. CONCLUSION .....................................................14 X. EXHIBITS A. Radio Frequency Engineering Report B. Site Plans/Elevations & Survey C. Wetlands Biologist Report D. Neighborhood Meeting Notes XI. ATTACHMENTS A. Owner Authorization B. Title Transfer Instrument C. Pre-Application Conference Notes D. Photograph of a Similar Installation 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CJ • AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tigard Conditional Use Permit Application L PROPOSAL SUMMARY INFORMATION File No: 1708-1115 Applicant: AT&T Wireless Services 1600 SW 4th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97201 Preparer for Applicant: Michael Birndorf W&H Pacific, Inc. 8405 SW Nimbus Ave Beaverton, Oregon 97008 (503) 626-0455 Property Owner: David and Christine Hammond 3015 SW 116th Avenue Beaverton, OR. 97005 Request: 50-foot tall monopole with flush mounted antennas and a 12' by 28' equipment shelter Location: 12562 SW Main Street Legal Description: T2S-R1W-102AC 1101 Zoning: Central Business District (CBD) W&H Pacific, Inc. April 17, 1997 1 AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tigard Conditional Use Permit Application H. INTRODUCTION AT&T Wireless Services is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to install a cellular facility consisting of a 50-foot tall slim-line monopole and three flush-mounted panel antennas at 12562 S.W. Main Street in Tigard. There will also be a small equipment shelter placed adjacent to the monopole. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the paved access requirement. Background on Cellular Communications AT&T Wireless Services is one of the original licensees authorized by the Federal Communications ' Commission to provide cellular service to the Portland Metropolitan Area. In order to provide this service, a region is split up into smaller geographic areas called cells. Cells are cellular signal coverage areas. Each cell is served by a cellular facility consisting of transmitting and receiving antennas mounted to a monopole or other suitable structure and an associated shelter containing radio equipment. As a cellular user moves across the landscape, his or her call is passed or "handed-off' from one cellular facility to another. Each facility is connected to a mobile switching center, which 1 provides connections to the land based phone network serving your home or office. When an individual cellular facility reaches its maximum capacity, in terms of the number of simultaneous calls it can handle, the cell is broken down into smaller cells and one or more additional cells is created. The resulting cellular facilities typically operate with less power and at lower antenna heights. Cellular facility site locations are determined after a detailed analysis by radio frequency engineers. Site selection criteria include: surrounding topography, distance from other cellular facilities, proximity to traffic corridors and population centers or heavy usage areas, and other technical factors. Computer modeling and radio testing are also conducted to determine potential sites. Proposed Cellular Facility: Responding to Demand ' The AT&T cellular network is a mature system, having been in operation for nearly 12 years. Consequently, new cellular facilities are being developed and others are being optimized in an effort to enhance coverage, increase capacity, and improve overall system efficiency. New cellular facilities are added to a given area "sized" to accommodate local area needs. As a result, new facilities in heavy usage areas, such as Tigard, are designed to provide coverage to small, targeted geographic ' areas. This limits flexibility in site selection. The proposed cellular facility location on Main Street is designed to enhance cellular coverage in Tigard including downtown Tigard and portions of Pacific Highway and surrounding neighborhoods. This facility will connect to other neighboring facilities on Pacific Highway at Watkins Avenue (proposed), King City and at Pfaflle Road in Tigard (Exhibit A). Besides enhancing cellular coverage in these areas, the proposed facility will also greatly increase capacity in this high call volume area. W&H Pacific, Inc. April 17, 1997 2 s AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tigard Conditional Use Permit Application III. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION The proposed transmitter/antenna site consists of a 50-foot tall galvanized steel monopole and an equipment shelter containing radio equipment. The monopole will be outfitted with three panel antennas measuring approximately eight feet long and twelve inches wide. Each antenna will be flush mounted on the sides monopole. The equipment shelter measures approximately twenty-eight feet long, twelve feet wide and ten feet tall and has an exposed earth-tone aggregate finish. The entire facility will be surrounded by landscaping equivalent to 15% of the total leased area. The landscaping will consist of a continuous evergreen hedge that will provide screening of the equipment areas and the monopole base from surrounding properties. ' Site Description The lease area is accessed via Main Street along the east side of an existing building on the property. The lease area is located in the south-west portion of the approximately .63 acre subject property, in an area that is presently covered with gravel (Exhibit B). Existing development on the property includes a commercial building. The leased area is located behind this commercial building in a storage yard. The commercial building is presently used as a retail paint store. All development will occur outside the 25 foot buffer from Fanno Creek, located east of the proposed lease area. Other ' adjacent uses include commercial developments along Main Street to north and west of the subject property and to the east across Fanno Creek. The property to the south is presently undeveloped. Further south and west of the subject property are multi-family residential developments. 1 IV. REQUESTED LAND USE REVIEWS The applicant, AT&T Wireless Services, is requesting Conditional Use approval to develop a utility facility pursuant to Section 18.13 of the Tigard Development Code and a variance to the paved access requirement pursuant to Section 18.124.050. V. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA The following paragraphs are a response to the applicable development review criteria. Compliance with Community Development Code 18.66 CBD: Central Business District 18.66 040 Conditional Uses I A. Conditional uses in the CBD district are as follows: 1 W&H Pacific, Inc. April 17, 1997 AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tigard Conditional Use Permit Application 4. Utilities Response: The applicant is requesting permission to construct a 50-foot tall monopole and associated equipment shelter for cellular communications. This use is classified as a utility pursuant to Section 18.42 and is allowed as a conditional use. 18.66.050 Dimensional Requirements: Nonresidential Uses A. Dimensional requirements.for non-residential uses in the CBD district are as.follows: 1. There is no minimum lot area required 2. There are no minimum lot width requirements. ' 3. Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18.96 and Section 18.100.130, there are no setback requirements, except 30 feet where a commercial use within the district abuts a residential zoning district. Response: The subject property does not abut a residential zoning district and the proposed facility is not ' a commercial use. Therefore, there are no setback requirements. 4. Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18.98, no building in a CBD zone shall exceed 80 feet. 5. The maximum height of any building in the CBD zone within 100 feet of any residential zoning district shall not exceed 40 feet. Response: The proposed cellular communications facility is not intended for human habitation and is, therefore, exempt from the height limitation per Section 18.98.010. ' 6 Maximum site coverage shall be 85 percent including all buildings and impervious surfaces; and Response: The total site coverage, with the addition of the cellular facility, will not exceed maximum site coverage requirements. 7. The minimum landscaping requirement shall be 15 percent. i W&H Pacific, Inc. April 17, 1997 4 AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tigard Conditional Use Permit Application Response: The proposed lease area will be surrounded by landscaping materials consisting of an evergreen hedge planted around the equipment building. The total landscaped area will be equivalent to 15% of the leased area. Therefore, the landscaping standard is met. 18.96 Additional yard setback requirements and exceptions. 18.96020 Additional Setback from Centerline Required. 18.96020 2. Collector Streets: a. The required setback distance for buildings on the following collector streets is the setback distance required by the zoning district plus the following distances measured from the centerline of the street. Response: A setback of 30 feet from the centerline of Main Street is required. The proposed cellular facility will be located greater than 200 feet from the centerline of Main Street. This far exceeds the special setback requirement. 18.100.030 Street Trees A. All development projects fronting on a public, private street, or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length... Response: The proposed cellular communications facility development will occur behind an existing building with a developed street frontage. No street trees are proposed as part of this conditional use application. 18.100.1 10 Screening Special Provisions A. Screening: Special Provisions. 1 1. Screening of parking and loading areas is required... 1 W&.H Pacific, Inc. April 17, 1997 1 5 AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tigard Conditional Use Permit Application Response: The applicant is not proposing to develop parking in conjunction with this use. The proposed communication facility is unstaffed. Infrequent maintenance visits will use existing parking areas on the premises. As a result, and as noted by staff in the pre-application conference, the listed parking lot screening provisions are not applicable. 1 18.102. Visual Clearance Areas 18.102.020 Visual Clearance: Required. A. Except within the CBD zoning district a visual clearance area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to the intersection of two streets, a street and a railroad, or a driveway providing access to a public or private street. Response: The proposed facility will be located in a CBD zoning district. Therefore, this standard is not applicable. 18.106.030 Minimum Off-Street Parking Requirements Response: There is no minimum off-street parking ratio requirement for an unmanned utility use such as the proposed cellular communications facility. Infrequent maintenance visits will use existing parking located at the premises. 18.108 Access, Egress, and Circulation 18.108.080 Minimum Requirements: Commercial and Industrial Use A. Vehicle access egress and circulation.for commercial and industrial use shall not be less than the following (See Appendix, Figure 19): Response: This proposed use does not require that parking spaces be provided, therefore, two-way access is also not needed to serve this facility. No specific access width is required for this use. The applicant is requesting a variance to the requirement that access to the site be paved, as described in Section VII of this report. The proposed facility location appears to meet Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue emergency vehicle access requirements, per a conversation with Jerry Renfro, Deputy Fire Marshall. W&H Pacific, Inc. April 17, 1997 6 AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tigard Conditional Use Permit Application ' Site Development Review Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that the development proposal be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The following are site development review approval standards applicable to the proposed cellular facility. 18.120.180 Approval Standards 2. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment a. Buildings shall be: (1) Located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage; (ii) Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding, (iii) Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire fighting; and ' (iv) Oriented with consideration for sun and wind, and b. Trees having a six inch caliper or greater shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. Response: The proposed facility will be located on a property that is developed with a commercial use. The facility will be situated within an existing gravel storage yard compound. No trees will be removed as part of the development, nor will the topography be altered or the natural drainage be changed as a result of this development proposal. The site is on flat ground in a well drained area that is outside of the 25 foot buffer area adjacent to Fanno Creek. The proposed site area does not contain wetland hydrology (Exhibit Q. The site location, at an ' elevation of approximately 152 feet (AMSL), is also outside of the 100 year flood plain, which at this location is between 148 and 149 feet (AMSL). r The design of the facility will take into account the ground conditions as part of the foundation design for the monopole. The monopole is slender and is approximately 2 feet wide. Consequently, it will not impair light or air circulation nor will it create an impediment for fire fighting. 1 4. Buffering, Screening, and Compatibility between Adjoining Uses: a. Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses... W&H Pacific, Inc. April 17, 1997 7 • • AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tigard Conditional Use Permit Application Response: A mixture of plant materials to screen the facility will be provided around the base of the monopole and associated equipment shelter. The existing commercial building will also screen approximately half of the 50-foot tall monopole structure as viewed from Main Street. However, it is not possible to screen the entire facility and still allow the necessary clear line of sight to the antennae structure. The proposed 50-foot tall monopole structure, with flush mounted antennas is similar in ' design to many parking lot light standards. Consequently, it is far less obtrusive than the power poles and associated transmission lines that exist throughout the area. Furthermore, the building height requirement for non-utility structures in the CBD zone is 80 feet. The monopole structure is proposed to be 30 feet below what the district allows for commercial buildings, which are permitted outright. ' b. On site screening front view from adjoining properties of such things as service areas.. . Response: The ground mounted equipment building will be screened through the use of landscape plantings around the proposed lease area. 10. Crime Prevention and Safety: d. The exterior lighting levels be selected and angles be oriented towards... ' Response: The proposed communication facility will be located adjacent to an existing building, in a fenced area away from pedestrian circulation areas. No new lighting is proposed. 14. Landscaping a. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.100. ' b. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections S and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and c. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped, W&H Pacific, Inc. April 17, 1997 8 • AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tigard Conditional Use Permit Application Response: The proposed communication facility will be landscaped in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 18.100. Plantings will be provided along the perimeter of the lease area which will surround the facility. The type of plantings used will be drought resistant and, therefore, will not require the use of an in-ground irrigation system. A minimum of 15% of the leased area will be landscaped. No new parking, loading or service areas are proposed. VI. RESPONSE TO CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA The following paragraphs will respond to the conditional use criteria contained in Section 18.130.040 of the Zoning Ordinance as well as some of the other information requested during the pre-application conference. 18.130 Conditional Use 18.130.040 Approval Standards and Conditions. A. The hearings officer shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a conditional use or to enlarge or alter a conditional use... 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; 1 Response: The site size and dimensions are adequate for the proposed use. The site will occupy only a small fraction, less than 4%, of the 27,500 square foot subject property. The proposed facility will be located in a fenced gravel storage yard. The proposal is consistent with the CBD district and meets all dimensional requirements. 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. Response: The characteristics of the subject property are suitable for the proposed facility for several reasons. The size of the subject parcel is large enough to accommodate the existing structures as well as the proposed facility. The proposed leasehold area is on a flat area that is outside of the 25 foot buffer area adjacent to Fanno Creek and is outside the flood-plain. The small leased area requires no significant grading to develop the site. In addition, the existing building will partially screen approximately half of the monopole structure as viewed from Main Street. W&H Pacific, Inc. April 17, 1997 1 9 • • AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tigard Conditional Use Permit Application Another strength of this site location is its proximity to commercial areas and transportation corridors in Tigard. This proposed facility will help to better link telecommunications between King City and the Highway 217 corridor. The elevation of the site allows the radio signal to have maximum coverage, and helps to limit "blind spots" created by ridge lines. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. Response: The applicant is not requesting that any new public facilities be made available to serve the development as proposed. Power and telephone service are readily available to serve the proposed facility. The installation will not require any water or sewer, or any other public services. The facility is unstaffed. Therefore, there will be virtually no traffic generated from the facility. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. Response: All applicable requirements of the zoning district are met with the exception of the paved access requirement. A request to vary from this requirement is addressed in this application. 5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. Response: No signs will be provided. As demonstrated in Section V., this proposal complies with the applicable approval standards of Section 18.120.180. 6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Response: The Tigard Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged and Community Development Codes have been adopted to implement it. Applicable Community Development Code approval criteria have been addressed. Comprehensive Plan Section VIII (B) under Public Facilities and Services (Private Facilities/Communication) does not address cellular communications. Goal 12 Locational Criteria [Section 12A.1.A. (1) and (2)]/Minor Impact Utilities and Facilities are applicable to this proposal. The proposed site location will allow AT&T Wireless Services to provide enhanced cellular coverage along portions of Pacific Highway, downtown Tigard and surrounding neighborhoods. The facility will also allow for added call JMH Pacific, Inc. April 17, 1997 10 • 0 AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tigard Conditional Use Permit Application capacity in this high call volume area. AT&T is authorized by the Federal Communications Commission to provide cellular service to the City of Tigard. There are no visual, traffic, safety, or noise impacts, which would limit or impair use of surrounding properties associated with the proposed cellular facility. The development of this facility will not generate large scale construction impacts due to the type of improvements that are planned. The facility is unstaffed. After construction, there will be a once or twice monthly visit by a service technician to ensure that the equipment is functioning properly. The appearance of the 50-foot tall slim-line monopole structure is similar in design to many types of parking lot light standards and is less obtrusive than existing power poles and associated transmission lines in the area. In addition, the antennas will be flush mounted on the sides of the monopole to further minimize visual impact. VII. RESPONSE TO VARIANCE CRITERIA The applicant is requesting a variance to the requirement that all areas for vehicle maneuvering be paved with an asphalt or concrete surface, pursuant to Section 18.106.050(J). The existing access driveway surface from Main Street is paved up until within 90 feet of the site location and then the access material is a combination of gravel and/or bare soil up to the site. Paved access all the way back to the site, behind the existing building, cannot be provided because no paving can occur within 25 feet of Fanno Creek, pursuant to Unified Sewerage (USA) and City of Tigard standards for protecting sensitive lands. As demonstrated in the attached survey and site plans (Exhibit B), the buffer area consumes the entire area that is necessary for vehicle access to the proposed site. Consequently, the unique features of the property, which are outside of the applicant's control, make it impossible to meet the paving requirement. In addition, the proposed antenna/transmitter facility is unstaffed. Only periodic maintenance inspections are required to insure that the electronic equipment is functioning properly. Based on the applicant's system wide average, these visits occur twice a month. As a result, the access path to the site would be used infrequently, therefore, paving it is unnecessary. 18.134. Variance. 18.134.010 Purpose A. The purpose of this chapter is to provide standards for granting of variances from the applicable zoning requirements of this title where it can be shown that, owing to special and unusual circumstances related to a specific piece of the land, the literal interpretation of the provisions of the applicable zoning code would cause an undue or unnecessary hardship.... W&N Pacific, Inc. April 17, 1997 11 • • AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tigard Conditional Use Permit Application 18.134.050 Criteria for Granting a Variance A. The Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a variance based on finding that the following criteria are satisfied: 1. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, be in conflict with the policies of the comprehensive plan, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; Response: The purpose of the title, as outlined in Chapter 18.02. 010 of the Tigard Municipal Code, are: As a means of promoting the general health, safety and welfare of the public, this title is designed to set forth the standards and procedures governing the development and use of land in Tigard and to implement the Tigard comprehensive plan. The proposed pavement material variance is limited in nature and is not harmful to the title's purpose of promoting the health, safety and welfare for the citizen's of Tigard. There are no other applicable policies or standards that would be conflict with this variance. The proposed non-paved access meets emergency vehicle access requirements. According to Jerry Renfro, ' Deputy Fire Marshall, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue, all weather access road surfacing is only required up to within 150 feet of this unstaffed facility. All portions of the facility will be within 150 feet of the end of the existing all weather surfaced (paved) driveway (Exhibit ' B). Granting the variance would not limit or impair the orderly development and use of other properties in the district or vicinity. ' 2. That there are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, ' and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district. Response: The need for the variance from the Code's requirement to pave the access arises from special circumstances of this lot of which the applicant has no control. Specifically, Fanno Creek, and the associated 25 foot buffer adjacent to the creek, comprise approximately 17,270 square feet of the 27,500 square foot subject property or 63% of the total parcel area. The presence of the creek is the dominant feature of this small odd shaped parcel. This is a special circumstance that exists which arises from conditions inherent in the land which distinguish ' it from other land in the same zone. W&H Pacific, Inc. April 17, 1997 12 0 AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tigard Conditional Use Permit Application 3. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City Standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting some economic use of the land; Response: All City Code criteria are met with this proposal except the requirement that access be paved. The pavement requirement is met to the greatest extent possible. Only 90 feet of the 190 foot access length needed to the site will go unpaved with the variance. The City Code does not define what should be included in the meaning of "some economic use" of the land. The pavement regulation is not an exaction of private property for public use and does not impose a condition on the use of the property in an individualized, discretionary land use decision. Rather, the paving requirement was a legislative policy choice of the City Council enacted in the City Code and applicable to all accesses. The City also made a policy choice to require a buffer along the bank of Fanno Creek in order to protect the stream from the impacts of development. This proposal is consistent with that policy choice. 4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms, or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified in the title; and ¦ Response: An unpaved access surface will have less impact on existing physical and natural systems than ' if a paved access surface were provided. This request reduces paved surfaces where they are not needed. Paved surfaces prevent water from percolating into the ground, thereby increasing storm water run-off. Run-off from impervious surfaces contributes to flooding and ' increases the risk of pollution or contamination of lakes and streams, such as Fanno Creek. Therefore, granting this variance will help protect existing physical and natural systems. 5. The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum which would alleviate the hardship. Response: The applicant's inability to pave a portion of the access to the site is a hardship that is not self-imposed. The uniqueness of the land, namely the dominating presence of Fanno Creek, and the buffer requirement for development along its bank, make it impossible to provide the required paved access up to the site. Relocating the facility on the property was considered, however, there is no other location on the property, outside the 25 foot buffer, where the site could be located given the physical space and access requirements of the facility. As stated above, the variance requested is the minimum necessary to alleviate the hardship. Greater than half of the access to the site is already paved. W&H Pacific, Inc. April 17, 1997 13 I • • AT&T Wireless Services - Downtown Tigard Conditional Use Permit Application ' VIII. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ' RF Design/Collocation Issues At the pre-application conference held on February 6th, staff requested that the applicant provide an engineering report documenting the need for the facility at the proposed location. This information is included as part of Exhibit A. ' Neighborhood Meeting A neighborhood meeting was held on March 17th to discuss the proposed facility with surrounding property owners. Other than the applicant, no one else attended the meeting (Exhibit D). ' IX. CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing analysis and findings, the applicant requests approval of the proposed ' conditional use permit and variance application. These applications meet all applicable criteria for approval. X. EXHIBITS A. Radio Frequency Engineering Report ' B. Site Plans/Elevations & Survey C. Wetlands Biologist Report D. Neighborhood Meeting Notes I1 1. Iproject11 7081 1 1 61 wpdataU3b.app W&H Pacific, Inc. April 17, 1997 1 14 1 1 1 EXHIBIT A Radio Frequency Engineering Report ®AT&T ' AT&T Wireless Services 1600 SW 4th Avenue Portland, OR 97201 ' Office (503) 306-7484 FAX (503) 306-7486 March 20, 1997 City of Tigard Planning Department ' Tigard, OR RE: Proposed cellular telecommunications site- Tigard DT site ' Our Engineers have studied this site extensively and have concluded that this location is the only viable site that will meet our engineering needs and requirements. The studies for this area included computer modeling and actual testing of the sites to determine coverage, technical acceptability and suitability of the site. Whenever possible, we also conducted models or tests of alternate sites for collocation or joint construction. We have found no acceptable alternative to the site we have applied for. I have attached a statement and exhibits prepared by Matt Harkins, RF Engineer for this location. His statement and the "plots" clearly demonstrate the need for this communications facility, coverage of the proposed site, and unacceptability of collocation on the Sprint site. ' We have purposely designed this facility to be low impact by using a 50' monopole and "slim line" antenna design. The slim line design allows us to close mount the antennas against the pole in a vertical fashion to minimize visual impact. Samples of this type of mount are enclosed. Please contact me at the phone number above if you have questions. Very truly yours, Ron Fowler, Real Estate Manager ?(9 Recycled Paper I. ? • Tigard DT Site Objectives: ' This site's main objective is to provide additional capacity for the downtown Tigard area including 99W. The majority of cellular traffic is generated from congestion on 99W. This highway and a large portion of Tigard are currently served by a single site located on t Pfaffle street, north on I-217. While the Pfaffle site is providing relatively good coverage to downtown Tigard, it is heavily loaded and serves an extremely large area. The proposed downtown Tigard site must provide additional capacity for the area without causing excess interference, which degrades system quality, and with minimal visual impact. ' In order to accomplish this objective, the site selected to provide coverage for this area must be located close enough to 99W and Main Street that it will provide signal levels greater than the existing service to the target area without causing excess interference to ' surrounding sites. Propagation predictions for the two proposed sites are attached to this document. It should be noted that these predictions do not consider the effect of physical obstructions such as buildings and trees on the radio frequency(RF) signals. When comparing the two plots, it can be seen that although the Hall Blvd. site provides some coverage along 99W, this coverage is not strong enough to exceed the signal levels already existing from the Pfaffle St. site, and thus will not provide the required capacity offload. As previously mentioned, these plots also do not show the degradation of signal levels on Main Street due to the obstruction of `line of site' coverage that will be experienced by the Hall Blvd. site. ' Therefor, the Hall Blvd. site will not meet the required objectives for the downtown Tigard site. Matt Harkins RF Design Engineer 1 j /- - t rn a !i /, 11 u u 3 .r7 Metzger / ,_/? ? _ .. •?\ ' +i. LL AT&T Wireless Services Oregon 7 Signal Coverage Plot ?' CeIICAD II v2.4 Tigard DT Alternate (AAA) - H-MH48-000 Hypothetcl V1 AA . ? V2 AB I 7 . V3 AC DE ? rIQ h Qkurr?ucq.• , PRQP LAT 45-25-37 N • =s LON 122-45-56 W i/ GE 148 ft MORPHOLOGY N RADIUS 25 mi RADIALS 360 DELTA RAD 0.1000 mi =-="= -= - - ANTENNA 70-12-OONASP ORIENTATION 15 TN _ == -- r -- - ERP 15.00 W y - ,'--- _ _ __=_ - --- TILT 0.0 Elec Tx Ht 45 ft .f ' ' • ? ?? \??\. ??• ;'mo c • ? r ;, o tt , \ E THRESHOLDS OVERLAYS (Sig dBm) ;' >=-65 interstote Ro ;. \\`\ Bo a .' >.-75 Stote Roodwof s7 II E Local Roads >=-95 (? E3CUrli:' 'S •t1,, 3 - f . Miles . I t, ' 0 0.25 0.50 0.75 _-- - -=' ` SCALE: 1:24,000 03/19/97 15:0, o- C Ja•+\,` a p+ I j - •" wit , ? , ^??if r _.1 H ?eo T - ?•il i1 ??ii;,?{I 'lab a T. ii ?'•' ? ? III ? II •7.ROA i? If - i ? ?'I? ?. tl ?./'i eG / .it • J /. O n ?' ,r e •? 5 Jf 6 ' ? - • `:' /? ik _, a e lin AT&T Wireless Services Oregon Signal Coverage Plot CeIICAD II v2.4 •' Tigard DT (AAS) t: i sYS-95 ?1 - Seymour • Y1 cc V2 CD ? Y3 CE 1 PROP. MOM : Okumura LAT 45-25-45 • 200 LON 122-46-23 - GE 148 ft l _ MORPHOLOGY N RADIUS : 25 mi RADIALS : 360 DELTA RAD 0.1000 mi ' ANTENNA 70-12-OONASP - = ORIENTATION 25 IN - - ERP 15.00 w t ?µ TILT : 0.0 Elec 1x Ht : 45 ft T - W )ITTLER _ _ -- «?I•;- ooh ?i I ? ?F ------------ ---- ?t _?•?ins 0 THRESHOLDS OVERLAYS (Sig d$m) >=-65 Interstate Ro >=-75 State Roadway >=--35 local Roads >=-95 County Boundries NQ:? d _- tC Miles A n nn n rn n' 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 EXHIBIT B Site Plans/Elevations & Survey 1 1 1 1 1 1 VICINITY MA NOT To SCALE PRELIMINARY SET NORTH .-dombib.. momi. AT&T TIGARD MAIN STREET CELL SITE SHEET INDEX:- Al. VICINITY MAP Q2. SITE PLAN A3. PLAN Ad. NORTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS A5. GENERAL NOTES DOWN ?OWN MAIN St CELL SITE 125621 SW MAIN ST TIGAW, OREGON 01223 - Job X91104 I Dot*3/12/9-i DnwYq N0. Al +0. y \ PROJECT SITE s? FANN0 CREEK 1 1 4ti 1 A3 s? , GRAVEL YARD 1 ? s \ I NORTH 1 51TE PLAN rr?'? I'=3m' AT4T WIRELESS SERVICE5 0 miller cook 1600 sw 4th AVE. PORTLAND, OR '31201 0? architects, p.c. • a.i.a. Oo. DOWN Told MAIN 5T CELL 51TE 00 K•• ", AM '°"'t"WN 0WQM 072" u"M ' PRELIMINARY SET 125621 W ST TIGAR, O?C,MAINoN IGAR Joy No. D;; o..wrp No. 91104 3/12/91 A2 - 1123 91 NORTH PLAN A3 146'=I'-m' 1 AT4T WIRELESS SERVICES 1600 SW 4th AVE. PORTLAND, OR 51201 PRELIMINARY 5ET DOWN TOWN MAIN ST CELL SITE 115611 SW MAIN ST TIGARD, OREGON 91113 0 miller - cook ??O,n'archltects, P.C. • a.l.a. w N.W. Mt AVE. PORTLAND, OREGON onoo W;81 !10.0022 Job No. Date DnrAng No. 91104 3/12/91 A3 ?J L'@7 1 1 1 KEYNOTES: 1. II'-(o'. X 21'-9' PREFABRICATED EQ?IIPMENT SHELTER 2. 50'-0' MONOPOLE TOUTER W/ 3 ANTENNAS. (TOWER FOOTING DESIGN BY OTHE?S). 3. GRAVEL YARD. 4. LEASED AREA PROPERTY LINE. (t? BE DET.) 5. FANNO CREEK_ I 6. TOP OF BANK 1. 5'-0' SQUARE CONC. PAD. NAND IL NOT REQUIRED, PER UB.C, SECTION 3306. (a) EXCE t10N. 8. EXISTING FENCE. 9. WAVEGUIDE. 10. GRAVEL PARKING AREA WITH (2) SPA ?S. NDSI?APE AREA=80 Sr-. NDSCAFE AREA=225 SF. PLATFORM W/ ANTENNAS TOWER DESIGN BY OTHERS PROPOSED 50'-0' NIGH MONOPOLE TOWER PROPOSED EQUIPMENT SHELTER FOUNDATION DESIGN FOR TOWER BY OTHERS NORTH ELEVATION 2 EA5T q 1/8'=l'-O' A4 I AT4T WIRELESS SERVICES 1600 SLU 4th AVE. PORTLAND, OR 91201 DOWN TOWN MAIN ST CELL SITE 125621 5W MAIN ST IGARD, ORE, OREGON PRELIMINARY 5ET T TIGAR ON 51223 VA710N (D mnvmff 0 miller - cook 00? architects, p.c. - a.i.a. 00 N.w. M1 Arl. PORTLAND. OMOM 01200 to= 010.00U Job No. Dot. Drau*M No. 91104 3/12/91 A4 t GENERAL N0TE5: 1. VERIFY AND CONFIRM ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN OR IMPLIED ON THE DRAWINGS AS WELL AS THE PHYSICAL CONDITIONS OF THE SITE. NOTIFY ARCHITECT OR AT4T WIRELESS SERVICES FIELD CONSTRUCTION MANAGGER OF DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO START OF WORK 2. ALL MATERIALS AND IlOeIANSHIP SHALL CONF01 M TO THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, APPLICABLE STATE AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. 3. ASSUMED SOIL BEARING: 2000-4,000nl, SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT 4. PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL AS REQUIRED BY GOVERNING JURISDICTION. 5. REMOVE ALL EXISTING CONCRETE AND ORGANIC MATERIAL IN AREAS SHOWN TO RECEIVE WALKWAYS, SERVICE YARDS, AND BUILDINGS TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6'. 6. GRUB OUT ALL STUMPS AND ROOTS LARGER THAN 1 1/2' DIAMETER REMOVE ALL SCRAP METAL AND ALL FOREIGN MATERIALS. 1. DISPOSE OF CLEARED AND DEMOLISHED MATERIAL AS STATED IN AT4T WIRELESS SERVICES SCOPE OF WORK 8. EXCAVATION SHOULD BE PERFORMED IN A MANNER WHICH WILL CAUSE A MINIMUM DISTURBANCE TO THE SURROUNDING AREA. THE AREA ADJACENT TO THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE GRADED SO THAT WATER WILL NOT RUN INTO THE EXCAVATION. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL HAVE SHORING IN ACCORDANCE WITH OSHA REGULATIONS. SEE AT4T WIRELESS SERVICES STATEMENT OF WORK SECTION II FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES. 9. EXCAVATE FOR FOOTINGS, FOUNDATIONS, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS TO SIZES AND LEVELS SHOWN OR REQUIRED. ALLOW FOR FORM CLEARANCE AND FOR PROPER COMPACTION OF REQUIRED BACKFILLING MATERIAL. SEE AT4T WIRELES SERVICES STATEMENT OF WORK, SECTION 11 FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 10. ALL FOOTINGS TO BEAR ON FIRM, NATURAL, UNDISTURBED SOIL FREE OF ORGANIC MATERIAL OR ON ENGINEERED FILL. 11. EXCAVATE ALL SOFT, WET, OR SOIL OF UNUSUAL CONDITION TO FIRM, NATURAL, UNDISTURBED SOIL, AND BACKFILL WITH SPECIFIED FILL MATERIALS. 12. COMPACT AREAS BENEATH STRUCTURES AND FOUNDATIONS TO 95% OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D1551 OR AASHTO T-180, STANDARD METHOD OF TEST FOR MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS OF SOIL USING 101b. (45 kg.) RAMMER AND AN 18' (451 mm) DROP. MOISTURE CONTENT WITHIN 3% OF OPTIMUM AT TIME COMPACTION. I GEN A5) NOTES PRELIMINARY SET 13. BACKFILL MATERIAL TO BE SELECTED NATURAL FILL MATERIAL FROM ON SITE EXCAVATION OR OFF-SITE BORROW, TO CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING BLEND: WELL GRADED GRANULAR PIT RUN, OR BANK FIN SAND, AND/OR GRAVEL, SMALL COBBLES UP TO 11/2' IN MAXIMUM SITE WITH NOT MORE THAN 10% OF FINES PASSING THROUGH A NO. 200 SIEVE, OR APPROVED ON-SITE EXCAVATION MATERIALS. SEE AT4T WIRELESS SERVICES STATEMENT OF WORK, SECTION 12 FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 14. MAXIMUM 6' LIFTS, COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D551 OR ASSHTO T-180. SEE ATO WIRELESS SERVICES STATEMENT OF WORK, SECTION 12. 15. PROVIDE MINIMUM OF 6' OF 3/4' MINUS MINIMUM WELL GRADED MISC. ROCK BELOW EQUIPMENT SHELTER 16. STRIP MINIMUM OF 6' AT ACCESS ROAD. PROVIDE MINIMUM OF 6' OF 3' MINUS AND TOPPED WITH 3' OF 3/4' MINUS WELL-GRADED CRUSHED ROCK AT ACCESS ROAD, CROWN 3' AT CENTER SEE AT4T WIRELESS SERVICES STATEMENT OF WORK, SECTION 12.4. 11. REINFORCING BARS TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTM A-614. GRADE 60, DEFORMED BARS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLANS. SEE AT4T WIRELESS SERVICES STATEMENT OF WORK, SECTION 14 FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 18. CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3000 P.S.I. AT 28 DAYS WITH A MINIMUM SLUMP OF 3' AND A MAXIMUM OF 5' DURING PLACEMENT. CEMENT TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C 140, TYPE I OR TYPE 2. WATER TO BE POTABLE. AGGREGATE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTM C 33-86. USE OF FLY ASH IS PROHIBITED. ADMIXTURES WHEN USED ARE TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS AND APPROVED BY THE FIELD CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AIR ENTRAINMENT ASTM C 260-86 WATER REDUCING AGENT ASTM C 494-86 ALL OTHER MIXTURES ASTM C 494-86 USE OF CALCIUM CHLORIDE IS PROHIBITED. SEE AT4T WIRELESS SERVICES STATEMENT OF WORK, SECTION 14 FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 19. TOWER AND WAVEGUIDE BRIDGE SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY OTHERS. 10. MATERIALS SUPPLIED BY AT4T WIRELESS SERVICES AS LISTED IN STATEMENT OF WORK 21. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL CONCRETE, REINFORCING STEEL, AND HOLDDOWN CONNECTIONS. DOWN TOWN MAIN ST CELL SITE 125621 SW MAIN ST TIGARD, OREGON 91223 Job No. Dot* Owinp Na 91104 3/12/91 A5 s wv '7 Z-1, Its -cc l /? i \\ ?/ '? :fir d SEE 9 ?. I *"Cis fA%V ?V \ nw _ f iii A _ 4W ? ? ?• sr \ A rs°° ?yl I ?? C' ?\.?' 91 FDfDAtiO ST :. ' • (?1j / Y :Tra.iA aq gLLT.tY A??I ntlnn ?1 9 :. 1 ?.. \ }• a4 -'I 9. 'MCDONALD Id? cr.A EE M I I ti Vol ---- ... - \\' / ? \ ¦ ,r a Sv flJrbI LT • I 41 LE7i8 \\ \\ 7ELE ISLA\\? \\ VlCI NTI Y MAP R PA • iD S/D• IR \ SUILDIIC \\\\ ??? \\ . i \ \ \ \ . ? ?' `\ R0S 7A7 or MME \ \ \ 12W SRD4 IRIS PAWSTY \ \ . LIIE LrI DE SUILDIAC \ \ LIrE. 9DLDIAC MWI \ SLlllflo+ILSIAGfLtPD \. % VUL YgRIiOR L I L '??1 ` 1L1L! L7UbE1 i' . ?" 1 1 L pp i \\ Ag'FWr 12 41 REGISTERED 1 1 BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE OREGON NORTH STATE PROFESSIONAL \ ` 1 A41AEDI USINGSGLOBAL POSE TIONIINNGASYSTEMAMEASLIER LAND SURVEYOR \\\ \I / MENTS WITH LEICA MODEL 200 RECEIVERS. THE mwj Tiw / DATA WAS TRANSFORMED TO OREGON NORTH (NAD 83) WHICH HAS A THETA ANGLE OF 1°36'44". A BEARING OF N 01°36'44" E IS TRUE NORTH. OREGON PP ,D .X f FEBRUARY 3, 1983 X',R.L BRUCE D. TOWLE ` arl:icts rJus I 2030 \\ FD YC IR I iP, I \ \ \ -6' TALL ii RENEWAL DATE: \ 6-30-98 x' r I SCALE 1 " = 50' k TALL -50 -25 0 50 \ 100 \ '- • \ J:' Liu I I 12- \ \ .>V' TALL I. mo o mm /aD I L>rsoooiso 7ason/PCAW LAND SURVEYORS mmm m SURVEY- FOR: AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES DESGV HSR scmi 1°=s0' S" a 1-360-695-1385 ENGINEERS DOWNTOWN TIGARD SITE DRAWN HSR MTE J191 ! 1-503-289-9936 SECTION 2, T2S, R 1 W, W.M. TL 1 101 ENGINEERING INC. 1111 BROADWAY VANCOUVER WA 98660 WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON CHECKED BOT JOBNO. 6077 2 11 I I I I k ?¦i 41 / d IELE MH METER BR?pGE ?? ? ? , . STEEL PLATE \? OVER MANHOLE GAS METER \ ELECT METER top TELE RISER 6 ?f ?\ \ BUILDING \. \ ; \ REGISTERED ?? ?\ \\ PSE i ?? \ PROFESSIONAL T8M 3O3 112" \ ROS 7207 BY HOPE 1183 ELEVAT I.R. ELEV. 151.14 FT G \ LAND SURVEYOR ION BASED ON BM 488 WA. CO. SHOWS THIS PROPERTY LIKE \ DATIAV \. ! \ ? t ON THE BUILDING LINE. \ \ \ ?l+TGj OR?G FEBR 1 \\ a \\ ` UARY 3, 983 BRUCE D. TOWLE \\ SOLUTION USING FOUND MOWjWNTS AND DEEDS \ I 1 7030 ' \ \ /, A. MONITOR \ . 1 RENEWAL DATE: 6-30-98 \ FELL I e PP ' \ \\ MONITOR r WELL I GRAVEL 1 o I N ' 1 i? ?' s } BASIS OF BEARINGS 25.00' \ r; / / I BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE OREGON NORTH STATE 000RDIN4TE SYSTEM. THE INFORMATION WAS DETER- MINED USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM MEASLRE- \ / `0 0 1 MENTS WITH LE1CA MODEL 200 RECEIVERS. THE \ ASVHALT 0 1 DATA WAS TRANSFORMED TO OREGON NORTH (NAO 83) \ ° z ?: T WHICH HAS A THETA ANGLE OF,I°36'44". A \ 1 / \*\ `" 1 \ /! BEARING OF N 01°36'44"EIS TRUE NORTH. SCALE - THE FL 000 PLAIN AS PEP MAP PL 1 30 \\ OF 5, 410276 00038 EFFECTIVE MARCH 1, 31982 Fy`F d r ` \ \ -30 -IS 0 30 \ SHOWS THE FLOOD ELEVA ION AT THIS SITE FROM \ \ I\ \ ' 60 \\148.00. FEET TO 149.09 cEET.. \ \o \ 1 MONITOP \ \ \ WELL.,: I 101, \\ /° 30' TALL DECIDUOUS Onto/600D 607016077 PIAN LAND SURVEYORS SURVEY FOR:: AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES?H,. _ 30 DOWNTOWN TIGARD SITE SCALE r;2 ' ENGINEERS %PEA 1-503-289-9936 SECTION 2, T2S, R 1 W, W.M. TL 1 101 ORAwN HSR DATE 3197 1-36D-695-13 5 ENGINEERING INC. 1111 BROADWAY VANCOUVER WA 98660 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON CHECKED BDT X8 NO.. 6077 1 C EXHIBIT C Wetlands Biologist Report ' • Creative Solutions ... Superior Service. PACIFIC MEMORANDUM 1 ` 9405 S.W.NimbutAve. Beaverton, OR 97002-7120 1 ' To: Chris Corich Date: February 19, 1997 Project Number: 1708-1115 ' Project Name: AT&T Tigard Downtown Regarding: Wetland Investigation 1 From: Phil Quarterman, Wetlands Biologist rf cc Mike Birndo I located the site and investigated the possible presence of wetlands. The site has disturbed vegetation and soils have been ' removed and replaced by gravel in some places. It was evident, though, that the site is well-drained, and does not have wetland hydrology (i.e. saturation to the surface for a prolonged period in the growing season). There were a couple of localized puddles where soil has been compacted, but I would not expect ponding to persist more than a few days, i.e. ' during storm events. Typically, sites like this on high banks next to Fanno Creek, have silty soils and are well-drained. The Washington County soil survey shows Aloha silt loam here, which is non-hydric. ' I would expect the vegetation this high up on the bank to be a mixture of Himalaya blackberry and reed canarygrass, i.e. borderline hydrophytic. This is the dominant vegetation immediately downstream from the site. ' Fanno Creek, of course, is a "water of the U.S./state" and is under Corps and DSL jurisdiction. The jurisdictional area, by definition, extends to "bankfull stage", which is typically reached by a flow with approximately a 2-year recurrence ' interval, and is equal to the top of bank shown on the plans. It appears that the cell site would be set at least 25 feet back from top of bank. In summary, there are no wetland concerns on this site. ' Engineering ? Landscape Architecture ? Environmental Services Planning ? Surveying and Mapping ' Washington ? Oregon ? Idaho 0 1 1 r 1 • • EXHIBIT D Neighborhood Meeting Notes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Meeting Minutes for Public Meeting Proposed Cellular Tower - Tigard Main Street AT&T Wireless Services The meeting began at 6:30pm and ended at 7:30pm at the Tigard Water Department auditorium. Staff attending included: Kelly Sweenson, AT&T Jason Wells, AT&T Chris Corich, W&H Pacific Spencer Vail, Spencer Vail Planning Staff were present the entire time and no members of the public came to the meeting. A public meeting for a different cell site was started at 7:30pm at the same location. Filed: minutes.doc • • AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN (;) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING. RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO. City ofTigwd Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard" Tigard, OR 97223 'PAOX I, e ey vk; o , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed l o5e- Q,rn ,4gRj, r a C ntofaoaole affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) 19562 Sw Ma,;h S/ree4 , and did on the S day of r4olArL41r14 , 19 97 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a Go?1d:`.na,1 rise. application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at 9 ;de- of MIAI S kre. OL? a 0L, e. addrefi . (state location you posted notice on property) 1 Si nature I * pres of a Notary Public) 1 1 (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBUC TO COMPLETEINOTARIZQ Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the Z day of ?c ti 1941 64 1 WILSON 1 RYPU8I-0FEWN ON EM SA053PRL16,2ooo NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON 1 My Commission Expires: 1(--?pplicant. lease complete info p _ r=ation below for proper placement with proposed protect) ---------------------------------------------------------------------? rrA:ME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: 7E OF PROPOSED DEVELOPI'IENT: ame ofApplimnt/Owner: Address or General Location of Subject Property: I object Property Tax Yap(s) and Lot T(s): ------------------------------------------------------- ? - n°logsno6ayvrast= -- Gepostr-= • s 1 1 1 1 F-1 L AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) SS. City of Tigard ) 1, AzLr,,,., o being duly swom, depose and say that on Fe?rua, a (? 190 1 caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. 1 further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at/ tewtws were a ; Lk,ed A Q a4 S3,1 o5 SW PA 6 s AL,,-,, ?,.ava r4 ok Z with postage prepaid thereon. Signature (In th `presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLEMNOTARIZE) Subscribed and swom/aifirmed before me on the 41 day of c c , 19,p. VM L VkgLSON NOTARY 9l8 -OREGON V a , ,v Gv ? ? COMMUSStON NO. 053163 MyCOMMSSIONUNRESAPRIL16,2000 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: q -If, -q q (applicant. ?lease complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) ---------------------------------------------------------------------i +ME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: -PE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: ame of Applicant Corner I ddnss or General Lomdon of Subject Properrf- I ubjea ?roper:., Tzz.'fapis) and Lot t(sk -------- --------------------------- 77- Date: Name and Address Re: Communication Facility Development Proposal 12562 SW Main Street, Tigard Oregon ' Dear Property Owner: AT&T, with the permission of the property owner, will be submitting an application to the City of Tigard for a conditional use permit to construct a 50' tall cellular phone monopole at 12562 SW Main Street. The monopole will be located in the back of the paint store at that address. This monopole will be similar in height and design to the AT&T monopole located next to the Oil Can ' Henry near the McDonald's on SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW 125th Ave. If you are in the area, drive by and take a look at it. At 50' tall, it is very similar in size to most utility poles and parking lot light poles. ' Prior to applying to the City for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting at: Where: Tigard Water Department, Richard M. (Dick) Brown Auditorium When: 6:30pm - 7:30pm J Date: Monday, March 17th, 1997 The Water Department is located adjacent to Tigard City Hall at 8777 SW Burnham Rd. (see attached map). ' This will be an informational meeting on the preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to submittal of the application to the City. ' W&H Pacific is working with AT&T as the planning consultant on this project and we look forward to seeing you at the meeting and discussing the proposed development. If you need more information prior to the meeting, please feel free to call me at 626-0455 between 8am and 5pm. ' Sincerely, W&H PACIFIC, INC Christopher B. Corich Development Planner ' Filed:1:\project\17081115\wpdata\notice.mem m m m m m m m m r m m m m m m m m m* m W1!Sr CIT.IAND 11SL' 51111CUAIA11TTCC CAST CIT SUIffi1 CIT CUNTHAL CIT . CITY Of TIGARD COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT TEAMS (CIT'S) NO III I AIION I is I, r0It AI'I'I.ICANrS WI111 IAND USE 111110POSAI S Abdtillall Alkadl Clark G. Zeller Deverly Fronde Craig I lopkins 11905 SW 1251h Courl 13200 SW Shore Drive 12200 SW Bull Mounlatn Roar 7430 SW Vams Slrecl Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 524-1060 (503)524.0094 (503)639.2529 Bill Gross Lerry Weslerman I(a111y Smllh Mark F. Matron 11035 SW 1351h Avenue 13665 SW Fem Sheol 11645 SW Cloud Court 113 10 SW 0Ist Court Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 07223 Tlgnrd, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 07223 (503)524.6325 (503)524.4550 (503)039.0004 Kathie KRIllo Clulsly I lair 1-111da Maslers Jool Slovens 12940 SW Glacier Lily Drive 11306 SW Ironwood Loop 15120 SW 141st Avenuo 9060 SW Venlma Courl Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 1lgard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 (503)'524.5200 (503) 590.1010/(603) 624.0009 (503) 020.7602 Ed I lowden Oarhara Snlllcr Scott Russell Pal Wyrlen 11020 SW Morning Itill 11245 SW Morgml Court 31291 Raymond Crack Rand 0122 SW Spruce Sireel TlgarJ, OR 07223 1lUard. OR 07223 Scnppoose, OR 97056 Tigard, OR 01223 (503) 524.6040 (503) G04.9303 (503) 043-2434 Bonrro a Jim Roach June Sulfhidgn Col Woolnry 14447 SW Twekesblrry D?Ivo 15940 SW 146111 Avculre 12356 SW 132nd Court Tlgnrd, OR 97224 Tigard, Olt 07224 Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 590.0401 (503) 500.0523 (503) 500.4207 I'LI!ASC NOM In addition to properly owners willilu 250 feel, nolico of rneeIliigs on land use Proposals s11811 bo sent to all the names on Ihis list. d .Inck Dlelhan 15525 SW 1091h Avenue -rigani, OR 97224 John Dannelh 15550 SW 109111 Avenuo lignrd, Oft 97224 ,lo5 F . ^_T G Karl Swanson 11410 SW Ironwood Loop Tlgnrd, OR 07223 (503) 590-3369 D?lan Mallin 10965 SW I'alllfrruler Way -Ilgarrl, Olt 07223.3930 0 • t4..nik m- 4 AI• . ... ........ ... . . x Donald & Shirley Hanson 'P^ Box 12 1 )ches OR 97067 ald Ha Shirley O Bo ches OR :6-n---& 1 Alex & Lotti Finke Christian Hans PO Box 23562 1 Tigard OR 97281 1 Otto Sorg PO Box 2971 Portland OR 97208 Craig Hopkins ' 7430 SW Varns Street Tigard OR 97223 Pat Wyden 8122 SW Spruce Street 1 Tigard OR 97223 1 i ' Ron Fowler AT&T 1600 SW 4th Avenue 1 Portland OR 97201 1 1 1 1 • Page Stevens 9180 SW Burnham St Tigard OR 97223 DOLAN & COMPANY L L C 12520 SW Main St Tigard OR 97223 George Kadey Jr. 12551 SW Main St Tigard OR 97223 Eugene & Vivian Davis 10875 SW 89th Ave Tigard OR 97223 I Mark F. Mahon i 11310 SW 91st Court Tigard OR 97223 I Spencer Vail AT&T 4505 NE 24th Avenue Portland OR 97211 • CASA LA VETA ASSOCIATES HIGHLANDS ASSOCIATES PO Box 5886 Portland OR 97228 i Gerald Joan Cach 12525 SW Main St Tigard OR 97223 David Hammond Christine Hammond 3015 SW 116th Ave Beaverton OR 97005 i Ray Hoffarber 12005 SW Hall Blvd Tigard OR 97223 Joel Stevens 9660 SW Ventura Court Tigard OR 97223 P N Tigard Water Department 8777 SW Burnham Road Tigard, Oregon 97223 • s?: v?y -RGAQ WATER DEPT N COONALD J J Q b) • • 1 ATTACHMENT A 11 t r. Owner Authorization November 19, 1996 City of Tigard Planning Department ' 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97224 Re: Land Use Application Proposed Cell Site To Whom It May Concern: Negotiations are currently under way between David E. & Christine N. Hammond and AT&T Wireless Services of Oregon, Inc., to finalize a lease on the property located at 12562 SW Main Street, Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. We are aware of the need for AT&T Wireless Services to make application to the Tigard Planning Department for approval of their proposed plans, as well as a building permit at a later date. We have no objection to their making such application at their own cost and risk. Please accept this letter as authority from the property owner to allow the processing of such application. Very Truly Yours, David E. Hammond Christine N. Hammond 1 1 1 r 0 0 ATTACHMENT B Title Transfer Instrument 3P /04/97_ FRI 16:12 FAX 503 306 6177 ATT WIRELESS o- ?,? __ ..: • ? ..? ?,.? ? 91034908 M t a • . :` 1t r C j Was;rwtatt County _ s,rAii'UTORY WARRANTY DEED 'JOHN R GULLEY AND LOIS I GULEY HUSBAND AND WIFE _ r Grantor, :. a conveys and warrants to _DAVI? E. HAi'lOND AND CHRISTINE rs ttnMMJND HUSBAND AND WIFE y rg; Grantee, , ttx follow°.n$ described real propertyfree m liens and encumbrance; except at specifically set forth herein: t?h'4 SEE EXHBIT "A" ATTACHED. ...:, SUBJEC•i TO: STATUTORY POWERS AND ASSESSMENT OF UNIFIED SEWERAGE ACFNCY.. RIGHTS } Its OF. THE PUBLIC IN AND TO THAT PORTION OF THE PREMISES. ' EASEMENT RECORDED JANUARY 1< f 15, 1959 It; BOOK 413 PACE 436: RIGHT. OF WAY AGREEMENT RECoRDFD MARCH 22, 1962 _ '. 2 Q IN BOOK 459 PAGE'512: EASEMENT RECORDED HAY 2, 1967 IN BOOK 640 PACE 223. a(•. EASEMENT RECORDED JUNE 22, 1967 IN BOOK 647 PAGE'2?9.' ?. ' e?= r • + v; iii:? '?'j ra?oo?asa ey ' . . -tlcee TBIe Insurance CAmDeny of Oregu + - itrst Ame p1 _?: •? ? fr ,?{a VnsENG:'On ' COUNTY r,,.::w ry This property is free of liens and encumbrances, EXCEPT: NONE. REAL PRU.r£I77Y 'T.9t:vS.=EA TAX ;. m?•r FEE wo DATE THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLCIV USE OF. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN `? t VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING. OR ACCEPTING N r 4t ( THLS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRI\G FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD..CHECK WITH . •t`'. *?.. r`µ t' THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLA?iNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES. s: The true consideration for this conveyance is $ 175,000.00 (Here comply wim the requireme6ts or ORS 91470) A Dated this Z5 day of June 19 91 , {"t CFULLEY. JOHN R. ?ifv C Y, IRIS I. STATE OF OREGON i! counyar WASHINGTON :•lyt ;j ?;? >vti:?T ,t•,` Juna , 1991-, before m4 the BE IT REMEMBERED, That on tilt 98 dory of undenigntd a Notary Public in and for said Coumy and Stale, personally appeared the wdhin nri?ned ?. -r.:• JOHN ' R. GULLEY AND LOTC T. M_ rijm - i•,•qt '•*•?? YI known to lneb be'rhe id4nYcd tndividaal s-dueraed In and Whogrdllit tvilhtn tnsbument and aclaowledard to me that'-; THEY aoeeuted the tame fiEely and votun % '::' ' 1N TE3TIMO.Iyr YHEREOF, I have here•,?nto Sc( MY hand aX ar ofjrr(at edi It day d 3Yar last above x?' t rte. W/L(t/l. \\\ r,-?'+ i; Notary Pub or Onton. Pee,' r ` f `r +' My Commtrston expires 4-16-94 Title Order No. /U20 1b r Escrow No. 9150637 Arran fecwdmp MUM b: D4VID E. HAMMOND 20830 Sot F.RTN TRRRA4r ALOHA 0. 97006 Nsme, Address, ZIp Untll's champ Is mquoatad all tax statements chap be sent to the tolbWmg address. DAVTn E_ HAMMOND 20930 SW E RIH TERRACE AAJDHA, -OR 97006 dame, I4dress, Lp THIS SPACE RESERVED FOR RECORDERS-USE 4111111 411111111 g: 04/04/97 FRI 16:13 FAX 503 306 6177 Ali Vilxtltbb _ 7 Order No.' 700616 EXHIBIT 'A' Being a part of. the George.Richardson Donation Land Claim, No. 38, in Township 2 South, Ranged East, Willamette Meridian, in the cz County o£ Washington and State of Oregon, to-wi..t: ?. Beginning at a point irt the' center of Taylor's Ferry Road in.the George Richardson Donation Land claim No.. 38 in Section 2,. Township 2 South, Range .1 West, Willamette Meridian, in.'tha county 'of Washington and state of Oregon, which said beginning point is reached by beginning, at a point on the North line of. said Richardson Donation Land Claim which is the Northeast corner of the George Frewing land 'in said claim, arid. running South 42'1.5' East 30 feet. to a point in the center of said Taylor's, Ferry Road;.thenee•followirg the center of said road North•46027' East 539.9 feet to the -angle in .said road; thence along the center. of 'said road North 71'53' East 369.60 feet to a point; thence. dorth 57°.54' 'East 2.50 feet along 'the center line of 'Paid Taylor's ' Perry Road to ' the true. point o£ beginning of . the parcel herein des.cr.ibed; `:hence North 57054' Eas.t 117.00 feet along the center line of said Taylor's Ferry toad 'to a point"at the :most Northwesterly corner of Tract 1 in Burnham Tract, a recorded plat.. in'• the Records of Washington Countv, Oregon; !;he.nce. South 49°30'' East 128.70 feet :along the Westerly line of . said Tract 1 to' an iron piper thence, South 16015' East '126.40. feet along the westerly. line of said Tract 'i to. an iron. pipe at the' most Southwesterly corner of said Tract t and the.most. Northwesterly corner of Tract of. said: Burnham Tract; thence South 4°151 'Ea'st 115,.65 Feet along' 'the 'Westerly line of said. Tract 2 ' tc, an iron' rod; thence, North 43002' West 352.90.feet to a point, in the center. line of 'said Taylor's Ferry Road and, true point of -beginning of the herein described tract. STATE OR OREGON couryof Washington. I, Jerry F1. Her. of Asaeument . and Tazallon aod??Pi?,?oo der of Con4 'veyances for,pMC oouny,'7ldhrr a pity that the within ,pd!rwneM ?. wril(Irg: eeelred , and rewrWC in book of recofda of Sal cunty. . k Jetty .t} Hanypcl Wr or of ' . Taial Er Msea$mant a" ' ONido Gout" 9 r ` Dec 91034908 Rect: 57261 213.00 ..07/01/1991 10:48:43AM :?^ ,:C'1•? .'?l'ij .c!T.'-I1 ?1',':. ./l:V i.4.': •.d' '? .i,: ''r ?.'-":aT ?:f: ?n?= :i.Yi.'' ?1??r ?:?Yi.:!;?r _ _ ?3:, _ - ,fr. ..?rr iY'J •1,..,' 'r.__>,.:'t:..Sitl ti?: ..?:. ': ?:"rw'-. .i:•. r? :-??.? ?.?. :..r:`1':.:,?:i?'y'i ?r l?.`:y'a,t!?•.: "y,.. .•s:'.:/..:` •.1J•- _ :?4. r•t'.,':.,f?ti: r: ?s. .. y' :.1."?i,;?.:?: ='st4?c'i' '*:w' ,ri!.. ,J: .f...r, `.Y,.:?y±' :?.1 ?'? fit. .,Zt; ??mot:+: ~•9 .:,4 iC+ .F,r; ,r.'??"' .i :.•J?' "Jf2" ^ - :.i?i: °''I{: : T' l: i_ k.. . ,i,.?,..4J?;ri? `??i;1?:? F %K y?,,,p!.?„1{:.: •.?f 7.,.T. v -. ???t•x.';: ?i.?::r,_'?.tr };E;.:?f'!,^:•[??/t'c`:??.. RA CSI' 'I`? i1??KY? tT•\::' [ ? F e 1:.J^,' Ara?1,J „?, ?,N?' ?LZ `'•`?n'? '?L?, j, ? `?•,J'?.)?.-t??p''1 yt?,v,?,. y t,C.?x?'.II 1? lT t I 1 l "u s..f f y .,.. ?'t."a w+ 6 p'V:' •,? r ? R n ??? aY ?? .A'?y,'4Scf ?? -J`? ? `i .. y x• 4'? 4J?,•„YFfr'{ ??,RSfT 1 `• rer.-i,,.;ry , J'?•,. • f.F?.fc^.•c f t ? ,r. Z' - . tir -?, 'i4?•.. 2y, 'yam' ( ??,? _ ??'.." ? X? ` '?,}??.n'7•f1?4 ?T?(tx? c a y t ?' K Y c 1 ! l ?r C?- k } ? ><ni ? .,. ^. lra' }? t.li E '{'! ?- 'rte ? '•Y ? _.,? y. r V.< ? ??ar Y r 1 °'a `1C,'-Ji dll vyl'?•"i.10`. .. L r ? M ti?h''i ?.A• lK,v'ff1. ?? - ?' { i M s w.?+'4YS' ?'"E. • ? I .N ?• L? Js'. ''S 4 ? r ti'Y,., T.?N'. ,?! ?iV ,; ?J' 1?{i,•?i`y??,JVJ?t'?`'7f???" y?r.?. r s a ?yi?•J? )'R: -'r"sw?c . `f "4{'P`lr t 5u?1 :?Y+ .e ?_ z ?tCl rt,/ r? 1?(??f,. r•}e. :i ?r-ajj.. v t?h?tj?.?r/,• ? yC:.ti J{.• 3'?1 t?,l.T:?:,?` .y r. .ti;?::.:l:,ti .n: ?[?r. r.. .: 1. ?:A• r`H?;4v;,+lt•{i ??7NK;{i?;?: i :.4•, M'1 .," 'r?YroeasaQ , O? 4 • • ATTACHMENT C Pre-Application Conference Notes ? CITY OF TIGARD ¦ PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES Y O? sWrV.A ?BdterCOOK-miry NOM-BESIDENT1aL .z/ 4Iq ,r - M13p, IMUR.- asEMT: Ge, S c?er' Ja ? I ? vw [ l "LEI S2 `{ S PhtOa: [ l ?-9 3 _ D 80 S PROrM LOCAn0lk Ao08 G 2 S r/YI a ?G+ 5 ??` ' ESS: 2 S -7 -5 TAX YAP/TAX W: Z /?- 1 a Lo V`' / Zi e q3 APKIUTION[Sk DESCRIPTION: BESIGNAn01: BMGNAn8N: ]I INVOLVEMENT AREA: Lo tj 011 ?- S6 012 Ole anal .e . a 4-n.- / .eK?or, ( 13u sl ,,e n I C e-- IRP) FACILITAT00: PHONE [5031 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL RE BEMENTS Min um lot size: l? sq. ft Average lot width: ?r Maximum building height: a ft. Lacim FrornI ft. Side ? ft. Rear ft. Comer ti a ft. from street. Maximum site coverage: -1-5 S % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: _?_% tBefer to Code Sudan _Y_ GIB- vl 1.0 &A ABBmONAL LOT BIMNSIO j ENTS ' Minimum lo25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots createf a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 1access easement. The depth oall not exceed 214 times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1 4 times thot size of the applicable zoning district. 64.060 - Letsl [Beier to Ced 8FWM0 ft*AMftWM WWWO Cg Nsms raga I N • I • • r IAL SETBACKS S W ?M a?ti . ? ? Streets: J feet from the centerline of ? Established areas: feet from ' ? Lower intensity zones: feet, along the site's boundary. Flag lot: 10 foot side yar setback. 419 (Refer to Code Section and 18.961 IOURMI (6 HOW PROVISIONS Building Height Exceptions - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided: 1/10' u b J?caL1?? ? A maximum building floor area to/s(e area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ? All actual building setbacks will be at least % (half) of the building's height; and ' ? The structure will not abut a residential zone district. fefer to Ctdo Seefto 1SAU201 JAMIOMMACCESS Required parking for.this type of use: ' Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): Secondary use required parking: Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): No more than 40% of Parking stalls shall be dmer Standard parking space Compact parking space (Refer to Code Secdoo 1 k spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. as follows: ;ions: 8 ft. 8 inches X 18 ft. ;ions: 8 ft. X 15 ft. ? Handicapped parking. All dimensioned disabled rs parking spaces to be pr v the Americans with Di handicapped parking spa appropriate sign shall be pc parking areas shall provide appropriately located and n parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person led, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by ities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an Bicycle racks are required for multi-f milt', commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected f om automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on th basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. Minimum number of accesses: Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for Drive-in use queuing areas: (Beier to tide Section 18.106 and 18.1081 C>tff tfTUMB Pr04XdC n eaatmeaCI Notes NFS.s- - ! eNdcoan/Madf bXWO"N sud" Minimum access width: fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Pape 2 of i 1 WALKWAY REQ91RE10ENiS ' Walkways shall extend I ramps, or elevators of all the required access and e ' in multi-building commerc should be constructed be Meter to Code Section 1i • • the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, mmercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide ass. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings , institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways en a new development and neighboring developments. Dt6 ABEA BEQ81R9tEMTS Every commercial or industrial Xig excess of 10,000 square feet shall be provided with a loading space. The space size shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Meter t• Code Section 1&106.0&MVMONAREA The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area ' depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. MeW to Code Section 15.1021 19HEMANDSCIMMIN In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between ' adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and ' must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional ' information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. MOW to Code INtapt X1001 ' The required buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: ft. along north boundary. ft. along south boundary. In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along ft. along east boundary. ft. along west boundary. ¦ OBAIMSCAPING Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the ' public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the ' proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. ITY of TIGM h0 4Xft8d= C9WWO a Maas Pale 3 u i ?YJrYwNI -A-A-m"Oft1 8080"Wear tatn.s I • • A minimum of one (1) tree for every seven (7) parking spaces must be planted in and around all ' parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed I information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. ®efer to Code Chapters M00, A106 and 18.1081 ?6NS Sign perms must be obtained prior to installation of Sign Permit " handout is available upon request. ' standards m be permitted if the sign proposal application. A natively, a Sign Code Exception Hearings Officer. ' Mefer to Code Sects 8.1141 any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Additional sign area or height beyond Code is reviewed as part of a development review application may be filed for review before the SUM !ANDS The Code provides regulations for lands which are potentially unsuitable for development due to areas within the 100-year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the t pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identif)f sensitive lands areas and their boundaries is the responsibility of she applicant. real ' Chapter 18.84 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive areas. Residential development is prohibited within floodplains. awmto Cade Sedloa 18.841 SEINMU AGENCY [OSAI IMM STANOAM 8 s 0 9644 Purpose: Land development adjacent to sensitive areas shall preserve and maintain or create a vel, corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet wide, measured horizontally, from the define boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City tc reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directec to an area of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowably encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent o the length of the vegetated corridor within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet ii width. In any case, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. wef iGM "WANdcon wde Pmx Maas P=4819 tt"RxhMWM tt?titlta/ThttM btsm"al stctlt¦ C? Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as allowed below: ' ? A gravel walkway or bike path, not exceeding 8 feet in width. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and ? Water quality facilities may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of 10 feet with the approval of the Agency or City. Location of Vegetated Corridor: In any residential development which creates multiple parcels or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. (Nub B s 1 BGd4= BegWdIe= - Besl hr SWdD BEYiYAI PtAl1 BED ' A tree pan for the7 ing, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be , parc or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partiti , site development review, planned development or conditional use is provided for any lot erred ver removal where possible. ' filed. Protection is pref The tree plan shall include th following: ' b Identification of the to tion, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ' b Identification of a progr to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following st dards: ' ? Retainage of less than 2 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program actor ing to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retains9a of from 25 to 0 Percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires ' that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; ' ? Retainage of from 50 to 7 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the tr s to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; ' ? Retainage of 75 percent or grea r of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; Identification of all trees which are propose to be removed; and IF T C Ff*49Pft3d= C?aierace NO= Pove S of i 2804* Yet"...eeaa.mn,d,tMfftmatsecuts C* A protection progra ' protect trees during Trees removed within the ' be inventoried as part 18.150.070. D. (Refer to Code Secdon It • defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to d after construction. riod of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section LGATION Replacement of a tree shall take place a ording to the following guidelines: ' ? A replacement tree sha be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ' ? If a replacement tree of the s ecies of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may low replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. If a replacement tree of a size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, t e Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in ' accordance with the Ilowing formula: ' ? The number of repl ement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available r lacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located ' on the subject property, Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other prope within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property The planting of a replacement t ee shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. ' In lieu of tree replacement under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its osts in performing such tree replacement. ' (Refer to Code Sectlon X15U70 (D) 11VE ? The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. ' (Refer to Cede Secdon 18.321 e?? sEen?ffs 18.80 18.92 100 8.108 /18.120 - 18.150 .102 _ 18.114 c? 18.130 _ 18.160 18.84 _ 18.96 ?? ?151 : 18.88 18.98 ? 18.106 _ 18.116 18.134 _ 18.162 18.164 bff IF UM f 4WC8dw fUdeM" NWS M85815 ON-&@dd8WW- No, 11 185MOW s.aa. 1PACTSM'By As a part of the application su mittal requirements, applicants are required to 'nci lude impact ¦ study with their submittal pac age. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities nd services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including b eways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water ¦ system, the sewer system and th noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the tudy shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the mpact of the development on the public at large, public ¦ facilities systems, and affected rivate property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the de ' 'on of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication re irement, or provide evidence which supports the ¦ conclusion that the real property dedicati n requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. ¦ (Beter to Code Cbapter %32, Secdon.0501 When a condition of approval requires transfe to the public of an interest in real property, the ¦ approval authority shall adopt findings which supp rt the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the im ct the proposed development will have on the public. ¦ O terto Code Chem A32. Secdon 2581 "IfE16880MOI N M6 The applicant shall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and the members of any land use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accelated. (Beier tr the Melg Merbeed Meeting Mandell LYCWi6 Applica should contact franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with ¦ Pride Disp 's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. Beterto Co Secdoe A1161 &MIMONU eoxeMxs oa eamrBff &- MICEDOeE Q ¦ ministrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. ¦ Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. IFnMo a C8a(eteace M111M Pie? d 8 al/MtlU ?/ MiM?t itdtq APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail 1 Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One 8.5 inch ' by 11 inch map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accept, 1 1 11 The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20 day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard -e-o' 14- H i I . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The took once and notes carnet cover all Cede fegeiremeots ad aspects of good site ohninbllp that should apply to the development of your sfte Mom FOn of the staff to pmfide bdormaden regWred by the Code WD aot aastma a waiver of the Vocable Standards or reguirements. R Is recommended that a prospecOn aooUCant eaher obtain and read the CommmfI Development Code of ask any gaestlens of Ciiv staff relative to Code requirements offer to Sobalthting an aooQcatloa. An Additional pre-application fee and conference will be required if an application pertaining to this pre-application conference is submitted after a period of more than six (6) months following this conference (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). h:*K0n%pattyVmast-W es pp-c. mat MJPgineerinq section: mastemUxeapp-c.eng) 7-Jan-97 PREPARED BY: 1 L a CITY OFTI6ARD PLAN IN6 DIVISION PHONE: 1503163940 FAX- 150316847297 "Of MW Pn-APPkW a Codereace NMS Page E of a U&MMeNU the Bsow teetUcilas ' 0 CITY OF TIGARD 0 CONINIUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPART,\AENT ' APPLICATION CHECKLIST Cmr aF noAao The Items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to ' be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. Sze your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard ' Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: JL1,eif? //3&0 Date: _-2,41q7 ' APPLICiT1 )N & REL-\TED OCCUMENT(S) SLBwUTTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARK 90 1 EMS j ' A) Application form (1 copy) 8) Owner's signature/written authorization C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed ' D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies ?-? E) Filing Fee 3 SITE-S?ECIFIC,mAP(S)/PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITEMS A) Site Information showin : No. of Copies I.- Vicinity map ? 2. Site size & dimensions m / 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10010 or 5 ft for grades > 10%) a -t. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds ?- 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: ? (a) Floodplain areas ? (b) Slopes in excess of 250 (c) Unstable ground (d) Areas with high seasonal water table (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential ? (r) Areas having severely weak foundation soils ?, 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Ntap Inventory including: _ (a) Wildlife habitats (b) Wetlands ri %. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings ? (b) Trees with 6" _ caliper measured 4 feet from ground level 8. Location of existing structures and their uses 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources e 10. Location of existing utilities and easements 11. Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways L10.0 LSE AP?UC-MON V UST PACE . CF 5 ' 8) Site Develooment Plan Girating: 140i Copies 1 . The proposed site and surrounding properties ' I Contour line intervals 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: ' (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and n i i dj o a n o ng properties (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site o (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension ' 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site (b) Parking and circulation areas a? ' (c) Loading and services area (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation is (e) Outdoor common areas o ' (t) Above ground utilities m/ 3. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and ' easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site ?- ' (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site f 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions t71? ' %. Sanitary sewer facilities o 3. The location areas to be landscaped °. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime ' prevention techniques 10. The location of mailboxes 11. The location of all structures and their orientation C / 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements C C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies ' The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1. The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lines ' (b) Slope ratios (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) _ g? (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development a/ 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report a ' (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals c (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated o ' LANO l 5'c A? °;:C4 TI0N / L ST . . . I PACE . CF 5 D) Architectural Dra%vin ?diicaSting: of Copier W ' The site development PV. proposal shall include: I. F?oor plans indicating the square footage of ail strut:ures proposed for use on-site ?. Typical elevation drawings or each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies ' The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale or the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: ' 1. Description or the irrigation system where applicable Q? 2. Location and height or fences, buffers and screenings 3. Location or terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ? ' 4. Location, type, size and species or existing and proposed plant materials ? 3. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions ? ' (b) Erosion control measures that will be used ? F) Sin rawin s: ? Sign d wings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 or the ode as part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining ' a Build ng Permit to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generat n Estimate: ? ' H) Preliminary Pa ition/Lot Line Ad'ustment Ma Indicatin : No. of Copies 1. The owner f the subject parcel C3 ' 2. The owner's uthorized agent ? 3. The map scale -)0,30,100 or 200 feet -1) inch north arrow and date ? 4. Description of p rcel location and boundaries C3 ' S. Location, width a d names of streets, easements and other public ways within and 'jacent to the parcel ? 6. Location of all per anent buildings on and within 25 feet or all ' property lines e . Location and width f all water courses ? ' 3. Location or anv tree within 6" or greater caliper at : feet above around level r, ?. All slopes greater than 23°a 01 10. Location or existing uti 'ties and utility easements ? For major land partition hick creates a public street: (a) The proposed right f-wav location and width ? ' (b) A scaled cross-sectio of the proposed street plus any reserve strip ? 12. Any applicable deed restrict ns ? 13. Evidence that land partition ill not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ? L{?? 1.5-c AM° Ck,ipv / LS' ?.aCc 3 CF 3 I) Subdivision Preliminary lat '0. 313 Data Indicatin : t ' . of Copies 1 • gale equaling 30,3 ,100 or 200 Feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet ' _'. The proposed name r the subdivision y C 3. Vicinity map showin property's relationship to arterial and collector streets games, addresses a telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer d designer (as applicable) ? 3. Date of application 6 Boundar lines of t b bdi C . y ct to e su vided ? .. games of adjacent ubdivision or names or recorded owners of adjoining parcels or n-subdivided land 3. Contour lines related a City-established benchmark at ?-root intervals for 0-1010 grades greate an 10% 0 ' 9. The purpose, location, type d size or all the following (within and adjacent to the proposed sub 'vision): (a) Public and private right-o ways and easements ? ' (b) Public and private sanita and storm sewer lines ? (c) Domestic water mains in uding fire hydrants ? (d) Major power telephone t nsmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) C ' (e) Watercourses 0 M Deed reservations for par s, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ? ' 10. Approximate plan and profiles o roposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicat on the plans ? ' 11. Plan or the proposed water distribut n system, showing pipe sizes and the location of v lv d i h d a es an f re y ran ? 12. Approximate centerline profiles showi g the finished grade or all streets including street extensions for a reaso able distance beyond the limits of ' the proposed subdivision 0 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed stre t right-of-way(s) ? 14. The location of all areas subject to in ndation or storm water overflow ? 15. Location, width & direction of flow o all water courses & drainage-ways C 16. The proposed lot configurations, appr imate lot dimensions and ' lot numbers. Where lots are to be us for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon su h lots. 17. The location of all trees with a diameter inches or greater measured at f ' = eet above ground level, and the locati or proposed tree plantings a 13. The existing uses or the property, includin the location or all structures ' and the present uses of the structures, and statement of which structures are to remain after platting 0 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) e ' (b) Proof of property ownership 0 (c) a proposed plan for provision of subdivisi n improvements ' 20. Existing natural features including rcck outcroppings, we?.lands & marsh areas 21 If anv of th f i i f L . e orego ng n ormation cannot practi blv be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a n rative and submitted ' with the application I,- LANO t.sE AP?LUrCv / us: PACE 4 CF 1) Solar access Cslc?jlation• ' K) Other Information l0? - W64- a Js ad 1 , C( -Z _ ?µ ; "d., M??6w? tvc,^ d? ?? t/?a{GQ? S?vud`ll•?s 5 a Q JeV a /w&,,a d f- oif? ' Coh- xbeve +4e- 100- Q 1N . h:?:cgi+ra?'masaers:l?c: isL.'rst Xtav 23. !993 • No. of Copies ' _1vC .Sc .1P?!:C??;Qr / .ES' P.aC-2 5 CF 5 1 ATTACHMENT D Photograph of a Similar Installation 3 r 1 e 1 ? f `? A -L J/ AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 - .3 PUBLIC REARING NOT101 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY. JULY 7.1997 AT Z= PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO(S): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 97-0006 - VARIANCE [VAR] 97-0004 FILE TITLE: THE RITE CENTER APPLICANT: Interfaith Outreach Services OWNER: Same PO Box 230821 Tigard, OR 97281 REQUEST: A request for the following development applications: 1) Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a 36-bed homeless facility; 2) Variance request to allow 10 parking spaces where 14 spaces are required; and 3) Variance request to allow an 8-foot side yard building setback whereas, 10 feet is required. LOCATION: 11070 and 11130 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1S1 35CA, Tax Lot 2500 and 2600. Eastern terminus of SW Greensburg Road and SW Tiedeman Avenue. ZONE: Residential, 12 Units Per Acre; R-12. The R-12 zone allows single-family attached/detached residential units, multiple-family residential units, residential care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use, residential fuel tank, and accessory structures, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.54.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130, 18.134, 18.150 and 18.164. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LIST ENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 6842772 (TDD - YELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. CITY Of TIGARD Community oew&pment ShapingA (Better Community 'UP 97-OOOSIVAR 97-0004 THE RITE CENTER NOTICE OF 7/7197 PUBUC HEARING ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSEPACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER JUNE 16, 1997, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25c) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25c) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER WILLIAM D'ANDREA AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. so r CUP 9700061VAR 970004 THE RITE CENTER NOTICE OF 7!1197 PUBLIC HEARING i • CITYOFTIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER CITY OF TIGA4k RD A (Better Co 1 SIGN-IN SHEET 91 S apingment NOTICE: ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN THEIR NAME AND RECORD THEIR ADDRESS ON THIS SHEET.u...__(Please PRINT Lealbhl) AGENDA ITEM #: 1 12.3 DATE OF HEARING: 7/7/97 Page 1 of FILE NAME(S): [THE RITE CENTER CASE NUMBER(S): [CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 97-0006 OWNER(S) Interfaith Outreach Services APPLICANT(S): Same PROJECT LOCATION: 11070 and 11140 SW Greenburg Road MAP(S) & TAX LOT(S) NO(S). WCTM 1 S135CA, TAX LOTS 02500 and 02600. PROPONENT (For the proposal) OPPONENT (Against the proposal) ?w PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME ADDRESS, AND INCLUDE YOUR ZIP CODE WIN Name/Addrenft aA]NNatlon] I9. Name: Name: Address: Address: City: State: Zip: City: State: Zip: h:tpattftnasters\signinhonst City: V,00-T L-,A a-"P State: E r2 - Zip: 9'Z 224 CCily; State Zip' CITY OF TIGARD Community Development ShapingA Better Community CITY OF TIGARD Was(ington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER a BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Number(s): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 97-0006 Case Name(s): THE RITE CENTER Name of Owner: Interfaith Outreach Services Name of Applicant: (Same as owner) Address of Applicant: PO Box 230821 City: Tigard State: Oregon zip: 97281 Address of Property: 11070 & 11130 SW Greenburg Road City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97223 Tax Map(s) & Lot No(s).:WCTM 1 S135CA, Tax Lots 02500 & 02600. Request -> The City of Tigard Hearing's Officer has approved, subject to conditions, a request for Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a 36-bed homeless facility. Zone: Residential, 12 Units Per Acre; R-12. The R-12 zone allows single-family attached/detached residential units, multiple-family residential units, residential care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use, residential fuel tank, and accessory structures, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130, 18.150 and 18.164. Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 6.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1 and 8.1.3. Man: -? ? Approval as requested 19 Approval with conditions ? Denial Notlce: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: 0 Owners of record within the required distance 9 Affected governmental agencies The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator 9 The applicant and owner(s) Final Decision: % .... ._... _ ............... ........ ................. ......... ......... . ......... ......... .................. ....... ........ ............... . ......... ......... ........ ................ ........... .......... _ ....... ............... ...........__ THE DECISION!SHALL'BE:FINAL ON>FRIDAY JULY 25, 1991 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS HILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $1,745.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of $500.00. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON JULY 25,1991. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. CUP 97-0006 THE RITE CENTER NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARING'S OFFICER • • BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application for a conditional use permit ) FINAL ORDER for a 36-bed homeless facility for Interfaith Outreach ) Services in the R-12 zone at 11070-11130 SW ) CUP 97-0006 Greenberg Road in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) (The Rite Center) 1. SUMMARY 1. Interfaith Outreach Services (IOS) requests approval of a conditional use permit to build and operate a 36-bed homeless shelter on a .72-acre parcel consisting of two lots. The facility will be built in two phases. In the first phase, the applicant will remove two existing homes and will build 10 off-street parking spaces and a 5000-square foot, one- story structure containing 24 beds in 6 rooms, common cooking and dining rooms, a child development center and accessory activities. In the second phase, the applicant will place a 1500-square foot structure on the site for offices and will build four more off-street parking spaces and a 2630-square foot addition containing an additional 12 beds in three rooms, plus a manager's apartment and associated common features. As amended, the proposed development will comply with all applicable dimensional standards of the R-12 zone. 2. At the public hearing in this matter, City staff recommended conditional approval. The applicant accepted the recommended conditions and responded to public testimony. One neighbor testified against the conditional use permit, citing concerns about land use compatibility, safety and the propriety of this use in a residential zone. 3. In this final order, the hearings officer approves the conditional use permit based on the findings and conclusions included and incorporated herein and subject to conditions recommended by City staff except as expressly provided otherwise in this final order. II. BASIC FACTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE The hearings officer incorporates by reference the findings about the site and surroundings in Section III of the Staff Report dated June 27, 1997 (the Staff Report), and the staff and agency comments in Section V of the Staff Report. III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS The applicable approval standards are identified in Section IV of the Staff Report. IV. HEARING AND RECORD 1. Hearings Officer Larry Epstein (the "hearings officer") received testimony at the public hearing about this application on July 7, 1997. A record of that testimony is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and Exhibit C (Written Testimony). These exhibits are filed at the Tigard City Hall. The hearings officer described how the hearing would be conducted, and made the announcements and disclosures required by law, including a disclosure that the hearings officer visited the site of the proposed facility before the hearing. The following findings summarize selected testimony offered at the hearing. 2. City planner Will D'Andrea summarized the project and the Staff Report. Hearings Oricer Final Order CUP 97-0006 (The Rite Center) Page 1 • • 3. Kim Brown and Keith Liden testified for the applicant. a. Ms. Brown accepted the Staff Report and recommended conditions of approval without objection. She summarized the services IOS will provide at the site and highlights of management and operations policies for residents and other clients of the facility. She summarized IOS's experience operating a homeless shelter in the city for the last eight years, based on which she argued the facility will not have adverse effects on the vicinity. She argued the proposed facility has a residential character and a relatively small scale compared to more densely developed two-story apartments and condominiums abutting the site. b. Mr. Liden introduced into the record letters from McKeever/Morris, Inc. to the fire district dated June 23, 1997 and from Architects Van Lom/Edwards, AIA, PC to Will D'Andrea dated June 25, 1997. He elaborated about the design of the proposed facility being compatible with the character of the area and responsive to the shape of the site. He highlighted proposed landscaping and screening, noting proposed trees will be concentrated on the south side of the site where there are no or fewer such trees than on the north side. 4. Kira Govshtein testified on behalf of herself and her uncle, who own units in the condominium adjoining the site. She argued the proposed use is commercial in nature and should be in a commercial zone rather than in a residential zone generally or in what she characterized as an exclusively residential area in this case. She argued the facility was incompatible with the adjoining residential uses, because the residents of the facility are homeless. She testified about her belief that most homeless people also are mentally ill, and that such people pose a hazard to residents of the adjoining condominium. Ms. Govshtein testified she received the Staff Report too late to prepare adequately. She also asked the hearings officer to summarize his observation during the site visit, which the hearings officer did. 5. Ms. Brown responded to Ms. Govshtein. She highlighted policies under which IOS operates its existing facility and will operate the proposed facility. Among other things, residents of the facility have to comply with those policies or they are ejected. If a person is ejected, she explained IOS staff accompany that person to a bus and give them a ticket or take other steps to ensure they leave. IOS also contacts the police about the ejection, and the police monitor the vicinity in response. Similar policies have worked well at the existing facility in that no neighbor has complained about or reported inappropriate behavior by facility residents or suspected crimes by those residents. She noted the facility staff is supported by 250 volunteers. She noted the facility will be largely family-oriented. The existing facility serves a relatively large number of families with children. She testified that roughly 30 percent of homeless people are mentally ill. She testified IOS conducted a screening process before a person is accepted at the facility, and people who are mentally ill are referred to another facility. The proposed facility will not serve people who are mentally ill. She noted that the Tigard Community Development Code does not allow the facility in a commercial zone. It only is allowed in a residential zone (R-12 and higher). She summarized past meetings between the condominium association board of directors and the applicant and commitments to maintain contact with the association board. 6. At the conclusion of the public portion of the hearing, the hearings officer closed the public record and announced an intention to approve the conditional use permit subject generally to the conditions recommended by staff. Hearings Officer Final Order CUP 97-0006 (The Rite Center) Page 2 • • V. DISCUSSION 1. The hearings officer concurs in the analysis and conclusions offered by city staff; to wit, the application shows that the proposal does or can comply with the applicable standards and criteria for a conditional use permit, and adoption of recommended conditions of approval as amended will ensure final plans are submitted consistent with those criteria and standards and will prevent, reduce or mitigate potential adverse impacts of the development consistent with the requirements of the Tigard Community Development Code ("CDC"). The hearings officer adopts the findings and conclusions in the June 27 Staff Report as his own except as otherwise expressly provided herein. 2. Ms. Govshtein presented the only disputed issues in this case. The following findings are responsive to her testimony. a. The proposed use is permitted in the R-12 zone and is not permitted in lower density residential zones or in commercial or industrial zones. CDC 18.54.040. Therefore it is presumptively compatible with other uses in the R-12 zone, subject to conditions and development standards to ensure the use is compatible in fact. b. The hearings officer finds the proposed use will be compatible (although that is not a standard for the conditional use permit, per se) as follows. i. Because its relatively small scale (e.g., one story height), the proposed structure will not loom over or physically dominate other structures in the vicinity. Conditions of approval and site design requirements ensure that lights on the site will not be directed nor cast significant light onto adjoining properties, signage is compatible with other signs in the area, etc. The materials, finishes and colors proposed to be used for the facility are like and are compatible with materials from which other housing in the area is built. Proposed landscaping is consistent with the CDC and is selected and placed to achieve a maximum screening and buffering effect. The structure and surrounding will be visually pleasing when viewed from off-site. ii. Because parking is isolated on the west side of the site, farthest from the condominiums, noise, dust and fumes associated with vehicle maneuvering will have little or no impact on the condominiums. iii. Because the facility will serve many families and will not serve mentally in people, the facility and adjoining condominiums will serve substantially similar populations. Although the residents of the facility are homeless, they are not criminal, antisocial or otherwise inherently a danger or risk to surrounding residents, particularly given the scrutiny to which the IOS subjects prospective residents before they are accepted and the policies to which residents of the facility will be subject. Homelessness is not a measure of a person's respect for the law or rights of others or ability to live in peace and harmony with neighbors. Although Ms. Govshtein's concerns appeared to be deeply and sincerely felt by her, they are not based on substantial evidence in the record in this case. They may be based on her experiences in the former Soviet Union or elsewhere. But, in the absence of substantial evidence to support them, those concerns are not a basis for denying or conditioning the proposal under the law. Based on the substantial evidence that the facility has not created problems at its existing location, there is no reasonable basis for concluding that the facility's residents pose a hazard or risk to residents of the vicinity of the proposed facility. Hearings Officer Final Order CUP 97-0006 (The Rite Center) Page 3 • 0 c. The hearings officer finds the facility complies with the standards for a conditional use permit for the reasons given in the Staff Report and the following: i. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use, because the site will contain the requisite number of off-street parking spaces designed consistent with CDC 18.106; landscaping, buffering and screening will comply with CDC 18.100; and setbacks will comply with the dimensional requirements of the R-12 zone (CDC 18.54.050). ii. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering its size and shape, based on the preceding finding. Its location is suitable, because the site is located in a district in which it is permitted as a conditional use; it is situated between two other residential uses and at the edge of the residential area; general vehicular access to the site is direct from Greenberg Road rather than through a residential neighborhood; it has ready access to multiple forms of transportation along Greenberg Road (i.e., bicycle and bus); and it is situated within the area the facility is intended to serve. The topography of the site is suitable, because it is flat, poses no restrictions on the design of the site, and does not create unusual potential for drainage impacts. There are few natural features on the site. However existing trees abutting the site have been considered in the design of the facility. iii. All required public facilities can serve the proposed use, including public water, sanitary sewer and drainage facilities, roads, and police, fire and other emergency services, based on substantial evidence in the record (i.e., written statements from the service providers). iv. The proposal complies with the use and dimensional requirements of the R1-2 zone, based on preceding findings. v. The proposal does or will comply with applicable signage regulations, provided the applicant applies for and receives approval of a sign permit if one is required or the applicant installs an exempt sign consistent with CDC 18.114.060. Conditions of approval do not directly require such a permit or compliance. The conditions should be amended to address this issue expressly. vi. The proposal does or will comply with applicable approval standards in CDC 18.120.180, based on the findings in the Staff Report and condition of approval s. vii. The proposal complies with the applicable policies of the comprehensive plan, based on the findings in the Staff Report. d. Many of the findings supporting approval of this application rely on the applicant to conduct the use substantially as represented in the application and the applicant's testimony. There is no reason to believe the applicant would vary from those representations, but things do change. To ensure the proposed use continues to be conducted substantially as represented by the applicant in this matter, a condition of approval is warranted requiring it, subject to changes permitted by law. 3. Ms. Govshtein testified that she did not have enough time to prepare for the hearing, because she did not timely receive the Staff Report. The CDC does not require the City to send a copy of the staff report to residents of the vicinity. It requires the City to send notice of the public hearing and to include in that notice a statement that the staff report will be available 7 days before the hearing. Such a notice was given in this case, based on Hearings Officer Final Order CUP 97-0006 (The Rite Center) Page 4 • • the notice and certification in the record. The staff report in this case was available on or about June 27, more than seven days before the hearing. Therefore the notice given in this case and the publication of the staff report complied with the CDC. Moreover the hearings officer finds Ms. Govshtein presented a cogent and articulate argument on behalf of herself and her uncle. Although she might have benefitted from seeing the report earlier, her failure to do so did not substantially impair her ability to participate meaningfully in the review of the application to the extent that she was denied procedural due process. VI. SITE VISIT BY HEARINGS OFFICER The hearings officer visited the site and surrounding area and summarized his observations at the hearing in this matter. VII. CONCLUSION AND DECISION 1. The hearings officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit complies with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to ensure such compliance occurs. 2. In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the hearings officer hereby approves CUP 97-0006 (The Rite Center), subject to the conditions of approval in Section II of the City of Tigard Staff Report, with the following changes: a. Condition of approval 5.E is hereby added to read as follows: E. Signs proposed for the site consistent with CDC 18.114 and, if necessary, a sign permit application. b. Condition of approval 10 is hereby added to read as follows: 10. The facility shall be operated substantially as represented in the application and in the testimony in this matter; provided, the applicant may propose changes consistent with and subject to the applicable requirements of CDC 18.130. TED #fis 9th day o , 1997. Larry Epstei City of Tigd =Officer , Hearings Oricer Final Order CUP 97-0006 (The Rite Center) Page 5 "EXHIBIT A" -- PARTIES OF RECORD (Written Public Testimony received at the hearing) June 25, 1997 Mr. Will D'Andrea, AICP Community Development Department City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Revision to CUP 974)006 Interfaith Outreach Services RITE Center Dear Will: Please accept the attached drawings as a request to modify CUP 97-0006. The modifications center around removal of the existing residence that was originally intended to be converted into administration offices. As a result of the significant cost to renovate the house, we propose to remove the house as part of the first phase and leave that portion of the site as landscape area. This will remove the administrative 'offices from phase one. In phase two, we propose to site a modular Administration Office building of approximately 1,500 square feet on the northwest corner of the site to provide administrative offices. In addition, phase two will include 4 new parking spaces bringing the total parking on site to 14 spaces. i Please find enclosed seven each of the following drawings (dated 6-25-97): Sheet A3 Phase 1 Site Plan This sheet has been revised to show the existing house (item V on the Legend) dotted in and the house is noted to be removed. Sheet A3.1 Phase 2 Site Plan This is a new sheet and includes a new modular Administration Office building located in the northwest corner of the site and 4 new parking spaces have been added. Sheet A7 Phase 2 Floor Plan This sheet has been revised to include the new modular Administration Office building of approximately 1,500 sf. shown on the upper left corner of the sheet. 1r.•Lil?•rl- VIII h.111 V,I:.ril 111. 0 AI NA hr?l. :I uilr:104 P., laII,1. 0It4;211v 11W111'11:11's 11\ Lt 111 E 1\1 RDS • Mr. D'Andrea June 25, 1997 page 2 0 Thank you for your consideration of the proposed modifications and if you ,have any questions, please call. We look forward to the successful completion of the CUP. Sincerely, ARCHITECTS VAN LOM/EDWARDS AIA,PC Sid L. Scott, AIA M7?= 1* • McKeever/Morris, Inc. 209 S. W. Oak Street, Suite 200 Portland, Oregon 97204 503.228.7352 fax 503.228.7365 June 23, 1997 Gene Birchill Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue 4755 SW Griffith Drive, PO Box 4755 Beaverton, Oregon 97076 RE: RITE Center CUP Plan Review Your File No.: 1558-97 Dear Gene: Thank you for taking the time on June 19, 1997 to discuss your June 4 comments to the Tigard Planning regarding the captioned CUP. To summarize the key outcomes: 1. With respect to the 150 foot emergency access requirement, TVFR will be satisfied by a letter of agreement from the neighboring condominium project allowing emergency vehicle access and holding the District harmless for any damages. The proposed RITE Center parking lot will not have to be redesigned. Gates will be added at both ends of the children's playground to allow access by firefighters and emergency personnel. This allowance would be effective only for the first phase of the RITE Center. When the second phase is constructed other options may be required. We understand that TVFR would still prefer a sprinkler system in Phase 1 also and we will be attempting to obtain donated materials to make this economically feasible. We hope to have Chief Johnson's help in this effort. 2. With respect to your comments on the parking variance, we understand your objection is, withdrawn, subject to the stripping and posting requirements you outlined, and a TVFR review of the RITE Center's written policies for their residents. Again, thank you for your assistance in furthering this important project. Sincerely, James H. Rapp Senior Manager 44- ), cc: Will D'Andrea, Tigard Planning Plannin Kim Brown, IOS Design Sid Scott, Scott Architects Public Involvement Project Management 0 • • "EXHIBIT B" -- TAPED PROCEEDINGS (Verbal recording of hearing including public, staff and Hearings Officer communications.) NOTE: Tapes are located in the Records Vault, Planning Section. i "EXHIBIT C" -- WRITTEN TESTIMONY C? (Applicant's materials and pertinent correspondence filed with Hearings Officer prior to Public Hearing.) Agenda Item: 2.3 Hearing Date: July 7, 1997 Time: 7:00 PM SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: THE RITE CENTER Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97-0006 PROPOSAL: A request for Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a 36-bed homeless facility. APPLICANT: Interfaith Outreach Services OWNER: Same PO Box 230821 Tigard, OR 97281 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density. ZONING DESIGNATION: Residential, 12 Units Per Acre; R-12. LOCATION: 11070 and 11140 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1S135CA, Tax Lots 02500 and 02600. Located in the eastern terminus of SW Tiedeman Street and SW Geenburg Road. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130, 18.150 and 18.164. Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 6.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 7:6.1, 8.1.1 and 8.1.3. SECTION II: STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Hearings Qfficer`find that the proposed Conditional Use will not adversely affect the 'health', safety and welfare of the City. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the following recommended conditions of approval: STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006 - THE RITE CENTER PAGE 1 OF 15 • • 1. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the sanitary sewer and storm sewer connections in SW Greenburg Road, plus any other work proposed in the public right-of-way. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. This permit shall be obtained by the applicant prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. 3. Any proposed services from the City water line shall be shown on the proposed public improvement construction drawings and shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Water Department, as a part of the Engineering Department plan review. 4. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 5. Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division, Staff Contact: Will D'Andrea (503-639-4171). The revised plans shall include the following: A. landscaping to be incorporated into the berm that will effectively screen the parking lot from view, and an additional two (2) parking lot trees to be located within the landscape islands adjacent to the driveway; B. minimum driveway width of 24 feet; C. caliper size of the trees to be removed. If these trees are greater than 12-inch caliper, the applicant shall provide mitigation in accordance with Section 18.150.025(B)(2); and D. written sign-off from the hauler regarding the compatibility and location of the trash enclosure facility. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006 - THE RITE CENTER PAGE 2 OF 15 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL • • 6. Documentation that tax lots 02500 and 02600 have been consolidated. 7. Plans approved by Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (AGENCY CONTACT: Gene Birchill). 8. The applicant shall complete the required public improvements and close-out the Street Opening Permit. 9. Prior to final inspection for the site and/or the building, the design engineer shall provide certification to the Building Official that the private water quality facility was constructed in accordance with the approved plan. (STAFF CONTACT: David Scott, 639-4171, ext. 311). SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History No development applications were found to have been filed with the City. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located at the eastern terminus of the intersection of SW Tiedeman Avenue and SW Greenburg Road. Property to the north, east, and south are zoned R-12 (Residential, 12 units per acre). Property to the west is zoned I-P (Industrial Park). The area is developed with a mix of multi-family residential and commercial uses. Site Information and Proposal Description: The .72 acre site consists of two (2) lots and is developed with two (2) single-family residences and associated accessory structures. The site has access to SW Greenburg Road. The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a 36-bed homeless facility. The proposal will be constructed in two (2) phases. The first phase will allow the construction of a 5,000 square foot building and ten (10) parking spaces. The facility will include 24 beds (6 guest rooms), common kitchen and dining facilities, and a child development center. The existing residential building will be removed. The second phase will include siting a 1,500 square foot modular building to allow for administrative offices, construction of an additional four (4) parking spaces, and a 2,630 square foot addition. The facility addition will provide an additional 12 beds (3 additional guest rooms), storage, some additional common facilities, and a manager's apartment for a total of 7,630 square feet. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006 - THE RITE CENTER PAGE 3 OF 15 • • The center will be open for persons living there temporarily from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m. seven (7) days a week, year round. In addition, the facility will house the child development center which will operate Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. An after school program will also be provided. The Interfaith Outreach Services (IOS) Health Clinic will be providing medical volunteers who will be available during scheduled hours. Phase II of the project will include a clothes closet and food pantry for walk-in clients. The office will be used exclusively to provide office space for IOS staff charged with the operation of the RITE Center, the associated on-site Self-Sufficiency Program, and with IOS administrative activities necessary to support the Center. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Impact Study: Section 18.32.050 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.32.250 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. There are no real property dedications required with this application. Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to construct a homeless facility. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as Group Residential. Code Section 18.54.040 states that Group Residential is a Conditional Use in the R-12 zone. Conditional Use: Section 18.130.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use. As indicated on the site plan, the proposed center meets all of the dimensional requirements for minimum site size, building setbacks, and landscaping. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. The site has an irregular shape but the building is designed to fit well within the property and not have a detrimental visual impact on surrounding properties. The location of the center is appropriate with direct access to a fully improved major collector street. The site does not contain physical constraints. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006 - THE RITE CENTER PAGE 4 OF 15 • • All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. Adequate public facilities are present and currently serve the site or shall be provided by conditions of approval. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. The proposed use meets all of the applicable requirements of the R-12 zone and the conditional use approval criteria. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. Compliance with the applicable Site Development Review criteria can be satisfied by this proposal, as demonstrated by the analysis presented within this report and review process. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan Policies can be satisfied by this proposal as demonstrated by the analysis presented within this report and through the review process. Conditional Use - Group Residential: Section 18.130.150(C)(17) states that Group Residential uses must meet the following additional dimensional requirements: Applicable Zone: Single-family and multi-family residential. The subject property is zoned R-12 (Residential, 12 units per acre). Minimum Lot Size: 5,000 square feet. The subject site contains approximately 31,360 square feet, exceeding the minimum 5,000 square foot, minimum lot size. Minimum Setbacks: See applicable zone. The required multiple-family setbacks in the R-12 zone are as follows: front yard - 20 feet; side yard - 10 feet; and rear yard - 20 feet. As indicated on the site plan, the proposed structures comply with the required setbacks. Height Limitations: See applicable zone. The maximum building height in the R-12 zone is 35 feet. The proposed plan shows that the building height is 24 feet, well under the maximum allowed. Compliance With All State Requirements. Applicable state agencies will ensure that this facility shall comply with all state requirements. Off-Street Parking: see section 18.106.030. Section 18.106.030.A.4 requires a minimum of one (1) parking space for each guest room plus 1 space for each employee. The two (2) phases of the center will have a total of nine (9) guest rooms. In addition, there will be up to five (5) employees during the day, and fewer staff members during the remainder of the day and night. This proposal, therefore, requires 14 parking spaces. There will be a total of six (6) guest rooms constructed with Phase I. Six (6) parking spaces are required to serve Phase I. Ten (10) parking spaces are proposed with the construction of Phase I. An additional three (3) guest rooms and administrative offices will be constructed with Phase Il. An additional four (4) spaces will be constructed with Phase II, bringing the total on-site parking to fourteen (14) spaces. Therefore, the proposed phasing plan complies with this section. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006 - THE RITE CENTER PAGE 5 OF 15 • • Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.80 (Planned Developments), 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. The subject site is currently developed with two (2) residential structures, accessory structures, and a gravel parking lot area. Existing topography and natural drainage will not be impacted by this proposal. In accordance with Section 18.150, trees greater than 12-inch caliper will be mitigated. The proposed plan also includes new parking lot and street trees. Buffering. Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. Buffering has been provided in accordance with the Buffer Matrix (18.100.130) and Landscaping Section 18.100.070. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. As indicated on the site plan, parking and storage areas shall be screened from adjoining properties. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the applicant's plan and has no comments or objections to the plan, thereby, satisfying this criteria. Phased Development: Section 18.120.050 allows approval of a time schedule for developing a site in phases over a period of time of one. year, but in no case shall the total time period for all phases be greater than three years without reapplying for site STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006 - THE RITE CENTER PAGE 6 OF 15 development review. The criteria for approving a phased site development review proposal is that the following are satisfied: The public facilities are constructed in conjunction with or prior to each phase. All public facilities required to serve both phases shall be constructed in conjunction with the first phase. The development and occupancy of any phase is not dependent on the use of temporary public facilities (a temporary facility is any facility not constructed to the applicable City or district standard). The applicant is not proposing the use of any temporary public facilities. The phased development shall not result in requiring the City or other property owners to construct public facilities that were required by an approved development proposal. The applicant shall construct all necessary improvements to serve this development. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type, and location of trees and shrubs. Street Trees: Section 18.100.003 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large), with a minimum caliper of 2 inches at four feet in height. As indicated on the landscape plan, street trees shall be provided in accordance with this section. Screening Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The proposed landscape plan shows a two (2)-foot-high, grassed berm. This berm is not adequate to provide screening of the parking lot from view. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted which provides for landscaping to be incorporated into the berm that will effectively screen the parking lot from view. Parking lot trees are required to provide a canopy effect within the parking areas. The proposed street trees will provide partial canopy coverage of the parking area. In order to provide the required canopy coverage, a revised landscape plan shall be submitted that provides for an additional two (2) parking lot trees to be located within the landscape islands adjacent to the driveway. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006 - THE RITE CENTER PAGE 7 OF 15 • • Buffer Matrix: Section 18.100.130 contains the buffer matrix to be used in calculating widths of buffering and screening to be installed between proposed uses. The Matrix indicates that where one-story residential use and a parking area, which provides 4- 50 parking spaces, abuts a residential zone the required buffer and screening width shall be 10 feet. The minimum improvements within a buffer area shall consist of the following: 1) At least one row of trees shall be planted. They shall be not less than 10 feet high for deciduous trees and 5 feet high for evergreen trees at the time of planting. Spacing of the trees depends on the size of the tree at maturity; 2) In addition, at least 10 five gallon shrubs or 20 one gallon shrubs shall be planted for each 1000 square feet of required buffer area; 3) The remaining area shall be planted in lawn, groundcover or spread with bark mulch. The parking lot buffer area contains approximately 1,500 square feet. Therefore, the buffer shall contain an additional 10 five gallon or 20 one gallon shrubs in addition to the one row of trees. The applicant has provided screening in accordance with Section 18.100.070.C, thereby, satisfying this criteria. Screening and Buffering Requirements: Section 18.100.080(E) states that where screening is required the following standards shall apply in addition to those required for buffering; 1) a hedge of narrow or broadleaf evergreen shrubs which will form a 4 foot continuous screen within 2 years of planting, or; 2) an earthen berm planted with evergreen plant materials which will form a continuous screen 6 feet in height within 2 years. The unplanted portion of the berm shall be planted in lawn, ground cover or bark mulch, or; 3) a 5 foot or taller fence or wall shall be constructed to provide a continuous sight obscuring screen. The applicant has provided screening in accordance with Section 18.100.070.C, thereby, satisfying this criteria. Section 18.100.070.C states that in lieu of these standards, a detailed buffer area landscaping and screening plan may be submitted for the Director's approval as an alternative to the buffer area landscaping and screening standards, provided it affords the same degree of buffering and screening as required by this code. The applicant has proposed an alternative landscaping and screening plan. The applicant's narrative states that this alternative plan will perform as well, or better, than the standard buffer in this situation. Staff concurs with the applicant's findings and concludes that this criteria is satisfied. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, signs, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The height is measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. As indicated on the site plan, this criteria is satisfied. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006 - THE RITE CENTER PAGE 8 OF 15 • • The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Section 18.106.020(M) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires the provision of 1 disabled parking space if 1 to 25 parking spaces are provided. The site plan shows the provision of one (1) disabled parking space, thereby, satisfying this standard. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(0) requires one bicycle parking rack space for each 15 required vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. This site requires the provision of one (1) bicycle parking space. The plan shows the provision of four (4) bicycle parking spaces, thereby, satisfying this standard. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that multiple-family residential uses serving 3-19 dwelling units or commercial and industrial uses which require less than 100 parking spaces provide one access with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. The plan shows the provision of one (1) accessway with a width of 23 feet. 10 inches (23'10"). A revised plan shall be submitted which provides for a minimum width of 24 feet, in compliance with this section. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street that provides the required ingress and egress. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access-driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six (6) inch vertical separation (curbed), or a minimum three (3) foot horizontal separation; except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. As indicated on the site plan, a walkway has been provided in accordance with this section. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a subdivision application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant's narrative states that five (5) deciduous trees are within the yard of the existing larger house. The two (2) smaller deciduous trees to the south of this house will be removed for parking lot improvements. The remaining three (3) trees measure 28 inches, 26 inches, and 70 inches, and will be retained. One (1) coniferous tree in front of the smaller residence will also be removed. The applicant shall provide the caliper STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006 - THE RITE CENTER PAGE 9 OF 15 • • caliper size of the these trees to be removed. If these trees are greater than 12-inch caliper, the applicant shall provide mitigation in accordance with Section 18.150.025(B)(2). Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to .demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign- Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The plans show the provision of a trash enclosure. The applicant shall provide a written sign-off from the hauler regarding the compatibility and location of this facility. PUBLIC FACILITIES: STREETS: This site is located adjacent to SW Greenburg Road which is classified as a major collector street on the City's Transportation Plan Map. The City constructed full-width improvements on Greenburg Road several years ago, which included the frontage of this site. There is an existing concrete sidewalk and driveway into this site that was provided as a part of the City project. The right-of-way (ROW) in this area is adequate for a major collector street. No further dedications are needed or required. Traffic impacts from this development should be relatively insignificant, as most of the clients of the site will travel by foot, bicycle or bus (Greenburg Road has bicycle lanes and is on a Tri-Met bus route). The applicant's narrative (Page 11) indicates that the typical ratio of clients to vehicles is 10 to 1. There will also be a maximum of five employees on the site during the day. Client use of the site is typically during the evening hours and overnight. Based on this information, it is Staffs opinion that this proposal will not result in a significant increase in traffic on the street system and therefore no additional improvements to the roadway system are needed. The location of the driveway was selected by the City in anticipation of development of this site and to be able to serve both subject tax lots (a joint driveway). Although the signalized intersection at SW Tiedeman Avenue is within 100 feet of the driveway, the City determined that the driveway location would function adequately for this site. During peak driving hours, the stacking of southbound cars on Greenburg Road at the Tiedeman Avenue signal will extend beyond the site driveway. During these times, the driveway will likely be limited to right-in, right-out turning movements. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006 - THE RITE CENTER PAGE 10 OF 15 • • WATER: This site lies on the border between the City's service area and Tualatin Valley Water District's service area. There are public water lines in SW Greenburg Road, two of which are operated by the City. There is a 16-inch water line adjacent to the east side of the site that could serve this development. The applicant's plan indicates that they propose to obtain water service from the 16-inch water line. The applicant should contact Mike Miller at 639-4171, ext. 395 for further information about obtaining water service from the City. SANITARY SEWER: There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line in SW Greenburg Road. The existing house on this site is presently served. The applicant proposes to extend a new service lateral from the main line to serve the new building. This will require an open-cut of the street and a Street Opening Permit from the Engineering Department. STORM DRAINAGE: The proposed storm plan for this development indicates that storm water will be collected and directed into a water quality facility in the northwest corner of the site. From there, the water will be directed into the existing storm drainage line in SW Greenburg Road. The open-cut for the storm connection will also need to be covered by the Street Opening Permit. STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. As was stated previously, the applicant will provide an on-site water quality facility. An extended dry detention pond is proposed and the preliminary plan appears to provide adequate volume for treatment of this site. The proposed private water quality facility will require a special inspection, to be carried out by the developer's design engineer. Prior to final inspection for the site and/or the building, the design engineer shall provide certification to the Building Official that the water quality facility was constructed in accordance with the approved plan. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006 - THE RITE CENTER PAGE 11 OF 15 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91-47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES: COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: Citizen Input: Policy 2.1.1 provides the City will assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning and development review process. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because a neighborhood meeting was held by the applicant on March 26, 1997, notice of the public hearing was provided to owners of property within 250 feet and was published in a newspaper of general circulation. Water Quality: Policy 4.2.1 provides that all development within the Tigard urban planning area shall comply with applicable federal, state and regional water quality standards. Policy 4.2.1 is satisfied as the applicant constructed an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 9644. Diversity of Housing: Policy 6.1.1 provides that the City shall provide an opportunity for a diversity of housing densities and residential types at various price and rent levels. Policy 6.1.1 is satisfied as this use fulfills an important need for homeless families and individuals and helps provide the diversity of housing types contemplated by the Comprehensive Plan. Public Utilities: Policies 7.1.2, 7.3.1 and 7.4.4 provides that the City will require as a condition of development approval that public water, sewer, and storm drainage will be provided and designed to City standards and that utilities shall be placed underground. Policies 7.1.2, 7.3.1 and 7.4.4 are satisfied as utilities shall be provided to serve this proposal. Fire Protection: Policy 7.6.1 states that Fire District shall review all new development applications to ensure adequate fire protection is available to serve each new development. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue was provided with a copy of the previous development plan in compliance with Policy 7.6.1. Street Improvements: Policy 8.1.1 provides that the City will plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. This policy is satisfied as SW Greenburg Road has been constructed to major collector standards. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006 - THE RITE CENTER PAGE 12 OF 15 Street Improvements. Policy 8.1.3 states that the City will require the following as a precondition of approval: 1. Development shall abut a dedicated street or have other adequate access; 2. Street right-of-way shall be dedicated where the street is substandard in width; 3. The developer shall commit to construction of the streets, curbs, and sidewalks to City standards within the development; 4. The developer shall participate in the improvement of existing streets, curbs, and sidewalks to the extent of the development's impacts; and 5. Street improvements shall be made and street signs or signals shall be provided when the development is found to create or intensify a traffic hazard. This policy is satisfied as the City has already constructed full-width street improvements on SW Greenburg Road. SECTION V: STAFF AND AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: Plans are not approved at this time. The applicant shall address the following plan notes and re-submit plans for review and approval: Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. An approved turnaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet. (UFC Sec. 902.2.1). Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than 12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 50,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight). (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.2). The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall not be less than 25 feet and 45 feet respectfully, as measured from the same center point. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.3). Where fire apparatus access roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked vehicles, "No Parking" signs shall be installed on one (1) or both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4). Signs shall read "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE - TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS 98.810" and shall be installed with a clear space above ground level of seven (7) feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have black or red letters and border on a white background (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.(1)(2) & (3)). STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006 - THE RITE CENTER PAGE 13 OF 15 • • Fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one (1) inch wide by six (6) inches high (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.2). The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire flow prior to giving any credits for fire protection systems. There shall not be less than one (1) fire hydrant for the first 2,000 gallons per minute (GPM) required fire flow and one (1) additional fire hydrant for each 1,000 GPM or portion thereof over 2,000 GPM. Fire hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the building and their locations shall be approved by the Chief (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1). No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of. the building and along an approved fire apparatus access roadway (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1). The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 per square inch (psi). A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available form the Fire Marshal's office (UFC Sec. 903.3). Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site or subdivision (UFC Sec. 8704). The fire district would oppose the variance on reduction of parking. Illegally parked vehicles cause problems during fire fighting. Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: Sanitary Sewer: The development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with R&O 96-44 (Unified Sewerage Agency's Construction Design Standards, July 1996 edition). Engineer should verify sanitary sewer is available to up-hill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O 96-44. Storm Sewer: The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to up-hill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by R&O 96-44. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating flow. Water Quality: Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006 - THE RITE CENTER PAGE 14 OF 15 • The City of Tigard Building Division indicated the following: The proposed building will cross two (2) property lines. The applicant shall consolidate the properties into one (1) parcel. The City of Tigard Maintenance Services Division indicated the following: The applicant should consider not to "blind" tee into the storm piping at two (2) locations on site. On site detention pond is private. Suggest sanitary cleanout between the building and street. PGE has reviewed this application and has offered no comments or objections. PREPARED BY: William D'Andrea Associate Planner, AICP APPROVED BY: i s \c u rp I n \w i I I \c u p 96-07. d e c Richard Bewersdorlf Planning Manager June 27, 1997 DATE June 27. 1997 DATE STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0006 - THE RITE CENTER PAGE 15 OF 15 BL SHADY W C7 0 I SUBJECT c: P RCELS---> ? N U Vi N CUP 97-0006 --- A THE RITE CENTER • I co CD ae m z W W co 3 h I EXISTING CURB CUT, 8 ENTRY GAZEBO REDUCED TO ALLOW 23'-I0" S BIKE RACK 2 DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE DRIVEWAY 10 PLAYGROUND 3 PARKING II 12 NEW SHELTER FACILITY 4 LIGHT POLE 14' HIGH 13 PATIO PHASE 2 FUTURE EXPANSION 5 '-' TRASH ENCLOSURE 14 WALKWAY SIGN tb I DETENTION POND EXISTING HOUSEIDJWR Emma) I5 MONUMENT SIGN I6 PENCE SITE PLAN EXHIBIT MAP PROPERTY LINE z '0 r? V Z z z Q J a. D 1.L. /Q _V LL 0 V CASE NCO. CUP 91-0006 THE RITE CENTER • • GENERAL INFORMATION Land Development Application Conditional Use for a 36-bed homeless facility. Variance to allow 10 parking spaces where 14 spaces are required Variance to allow an 8-foot side yard building setback where 10 feet is required for a multi-family use. Location 11070 and 11130 S. W. Greenburg Road (Tax Map 2S lE 35CA, Tax Lots 2500 and 2600) Zoning Designation R-12 (Multiple Family/Medium Density) Applicant/Owner Kimberly D. Brown, Executive Director Interfaith Outreach Services P. O. Box 230821 Tigard, OR 97281 Phone: (503) 598-0359 Fax: (503) 620-9378 Applicant's Representative Jim Rapp McKeever/Morris, Inc. 722 SW Second Ave., Suite 400 Portland, OR 97204 Phone: (503) 228-7352 Fax: (503) 228-7365 April 24, 1997 Interfaith Outreach CU Application Page - 1 ' PROJECT BACKGROUND Site Description ' The property consists of two tax lots. It is located on the east side of Greenbur Road (Figure 1). Two single family residences are on the north and south sections of the property along with ' detached garages for each. A gravel parking area lies in between the two houses. Lawn and several trees are generally found along the perimeter of the property. Access for both homes is provided by one large driveway apron. Surrounding Land Uses i The adjacent properties on the east side of Greenburg Road are also zoned R-12. I-P zoning is ' located on the west side of the street (Figure 1). The R-12 properties are developed with multi- family residences that are condominiums. Driveways serving these residences are located on either side of the subject property. The location of the property and these surrounding residential buildings are shown on the topography map (Figure 2). Light industrial activities, including warehousing and automotive repair, are located on the west side of Greenburg Road. Transportation Facilities and Services Greenburg Road is a major collector street. It is fully improved with two travel lanes, continuous center turn lane, bicycle lanes, and sidewalks. Regular Tri-Met bus service is available on ' Greenburg Road (Route #78), providing connections to Washington Square, the Tigard Transit Station, and other destinations. Interfaith Outreach Services Interfaith Outreach Services (IOS) is a private non-profit organization which has operated successfully for more that eight years in a loaned facility. Its mission is to provide temporary housing and assistance to homeless families and individuals in eastern Washington County. The Board of Directors for Interfaith Outreach is made up of business, church and community leaders ' working together to provide this service. Many people today live paycheck to paycheck. In the event of a crisis, some simply do not have the families, resources or skills to recover from a significant financial setback. IOS provides ' assistance to those in need with the tools to get back on their feet. IOS clients are those who show a determined effort to get their lives in order. There are tough application requirements and mandatory steps people must follow to maintain their eligibility in.the program. The goal is to get ' people back on their feet as quickly as possible. Presently, the. shelter and child development program are located in the basement of the Tigard United Methodist Church. The IOS office is in another location. IOS has received a Community Development Block Grant to purchase a permanent site for the RITE (Residential Independence Training and Education) Center. April 24, 1997 Interfaith Outreach CU Application ' Page - 2 ® Site Location 0/ MI-M McKeevedMm!, Inc. 721 S. W. Second AVCnue Suite 400 Ponlmd. Occgm 97204 (503)228.7351 f= (503) 2287365 Figure 1 Zone Map Conditional Use Application RITE Center April 24, 1997 Interfaith Outreach CU Application Page - 3 160.9 x 157.6 157.1 0 x C `? ------ 156,2x x \ 0 61.7 161. ?CD x 158.9 x 158.3 x 162.7 Q 156. ?" x 156. . / 156. S 0C8 I .. G -? x 161.3 SC 61,1 161.1 160 o x 1 MH o 0 xt61.1 X165.4 60 CB w CB0 0C 110 1 x H ?i 0 _ 0 L 1 X 1673 4 A 1673 °CB 'Cr X CB M.H M? x177,9 0S os B Q X181.0 AKOTA X178.1 ST. S 0MH. { Q Q FH 4 160 / e? $0 a C° OMH 177.9 i \ ° C8 MH FH X d P P xSPx Z 0 ¢ c x 1 °B xC 170. III 175,7 x t IE NORTH LEGEND m ? Site Boundary Source-.Cily or Tigard milm McKecrerlMurriL Inc. M II W. Sw-dA- Seiie166 ftnl-A 0.g- 97301 (303) 313.733. Jarl303) 1167363 1 "=100'-0'r Figure 2 Topographic Map 'Contour Interval is 2 feet Conditional Use Application RITE Center 172,2 i7° ? ° x .M T1Ix X 00- x ?I ° °CB B April 24, 1997 Interfaith Outreach CU Application Page - 4 t PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION Major Project Elements Development of the proposed RITE Center includes the following major elements: • Removal of the southern dwelling and garage; • General clean-up of the property including removal of dilapidated fencing and storage ' buildings • Conversion of the northern residence into a small office for IOS; • Construction of a 5,000 square foot building which will include 24 beds (6 guest rooms); ' common kitchen and dining facilities; child development center, and managers office; • A second phase that will include 12 beds (3 addition guest rooms), storage, some additional common facilities, and a manager's apartment for a total of 7,630 square feet; • Landscaped area and small playground; ' • A new wood fence around the majority of the site to prove screening and privacy; • Ten vehicle and four bicycle parking spaces; • A small monument sign near the driveway; and • One driveway entrance to Greenburg Road. These improvements are illustrated in Exhibit A - Sheets Al through A8 which are attached. ' Operation of the Facility The RITE Center will house 24 homeless individuals who will be a mix of singles, childless ' couples, and families. Phase II of the project will expand the center to house up to 36 individuals. All persons will be screened before admittance into the Center and Self-Sufficiency Program and will be required to participate in the program ad follow center policies (see attached program ' description in Exhibit B). The center will be open fro persons living there temporarily from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m. seven days a week, year-round. In addition, the facility will house the Child Development Center which will operate Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. An after school program will also be provided. The IOS Health Clinic will be provided using medical ' volunteers who will be available during scheduled hours. Phase II of the project will include a clothes closet and food pantry for walk-in clients. The closet will have a specific operating schedule, and it will be staffed by trained volunteers. Interfaith Outreach Services Office ' Regular office operations directly related to the center and Self-Sufficiency program services will be moved on the site to enhance services and supervision for the RITE Center. Office hours will be Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The office will accommodate a maximum of five employees. All administrative and direct client services staff directly responsible for the ' RITE Center operation will be housed in the office. All clients will first come to the office to be screened in order to obtain service provided by the RITE Center. April 24, 1997 Interfaith Outreach CU Application Page - 5 LAND USE APPROVAL CRITERIA ANALYSIS The applicable criteria in the City of Tigard Community Development Code are stated or summarized below, followed by a response for each criterion. 18.54 R-12: Multiple-Family Residential Section 18.54.040 lists group residential as a conditional use. The proposed development is a group residential use, requiring a conditional use permit. Group residential uses are defined in Section 18.42.020 A.5 as a multi-family use which typically includes such uses as retirement homes, boarding houses, cooperatives and halfway houses. This interpretation of the code has been verified by the city staff. Section 18.54.050 Dimensional Requirements The applicable dimensional requirements in the R-12 zone are: • Minimum front yard setback - 20 feet. • Minimum side yard setback - 10 feet. • Minimum rear yard setback - 20 feet. • Maximum building height - 35 feet. • Maximum site coverage - 80 percent • Minimum landscaped area - 20 percent As illustrated in Exhibit sheet A3, the proposed facility meets all of these standards with the exception of the northern side yard setback of the existing residence. The justification for a setback variance is discussed later in this application. 18.130 Conditional Use Section 18.130.040 Approval Standards 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use. As demonstrated in application exhibits, the proposed center meets all of the dimensional requirements for minimum site size, building setbacks, and landscaping. The one exception is the side yard setback for the northern residence. Because the residency will change from single family (which requires a 5-foot side yard) to an office associated with a multi-family use (which requires a 10-foot side yard), a variance is necessary to address this change in circumstances. 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. The property has an irregular shape, but the building is designed to fit well within the property and not have a detrimental visual impact on the surrounding properties. The location of the center is appropriate with direct access to a fully-improved major collector street which has regular bus service. April 24, 1997 Interfaith Outreach CU Application Page - 6 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. ' All of the necessary street improvements have been made, and all utilities needed for the center are available. ' 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. With the exception of the side yard setback variance noted in this application, the proposed use meets all of the applicable requirements of the R-12 zone and the conditional use approval criteria. ' S. The supplementary requirements, set forth in Chapter 18.114, Signs, and Section 18.120.180, Approval Standards, if applicable, are met ' Approval standards for signs and site development review are addressed below. 6. The use will comply with applicable policies of the comprehensive plan. ' Comprehensive plan policies are implemented by Community Development Code (CDC) requirements which are addressed in this application. The plan does include the following housing policy and implementation strategy which apply to this application: ' 6.1.1 The city shall provide an opportunity for a diversity of housing densities and residential types at various price and rent levels. ' An implementation strategy states: 6. The city shall provide for opportunities for proposals to develop specialized housing for ' the area's senior citizens and handicapped based on the needs of these groups by: b. Allowing special use housing for these groups in all development districts... ' The proposed center fulfills a very important need for homeless families and individuals in the area. It helps provide the diversity of housing types contemplated by the Comprehensive ' Plan. Section 18.130.150 C. 17 has additional standards for group residential uses ' a . Applicable zones are residential The R-12 zone allows group residential as a conditional use. ' b . Minimum lot size - 5,000 square feet The property is approximately 31,360 square feet. c . Minimum setbacks and d. Height limitations As discussed in this application, all setback and height requirements are met except for the northern side yard of the northern house. 1 April 24, 1997 Interfaith Outreach CU Application ' Page - 7 ' e . Compliance with all state requirements The facility will comply with all applicable state requirements and building codes. f. Off-street parking ' This is addressed below. 18.120 Site Plan Development Review - Approval Standards ' Section 18.120.180 lists the chapters of the CDC that should be considered during the review of a conditional use or site development review application. The relevant chapters and code sections are ' listed and addressed below. 18.100 Landscaping and Screening ' 18.100.035 Location of Street Trees This section contains requirements for street trees, including size, spacing, dimensional ' requirements, and relationships with adjacent facilities. The proposed street trees are shown in Exhibit A5. They meet the city's size and spacing criteria. 18.100.070 Buffering and Screening - General Provisions The buffer matrix in this section requires a 10 foot wide landscaped buffer area along the edge of ' the property. As shown in Exhibit A5, a 10-foot wide landscaped areas will surround the building. The typical standards for this situation call for shrubs and trees to be planted within this area to provide some degree of privacy and screening. Section 18.100.070 C. allows for alternative buffering which performs as well as the standard requirements. ' The buffering proposed (Exhibit A5) includes a 5-foot high fence along the sides and rear of the site, trees on the south side, and lawn. This will perform as well or better than the standard buffer ' in this situation for the following reasons: • Much of the site currently has large mature trees around the perimeter (see Exhibit A2). Planting more trees within a 10-foot wide space between the existing trees and the new ' building will not only be crowded, but no additional screening benefit will be realized. • The proposed trees along the south side will provide screening in places where large mature ' trees are absent. • Fencing in lieu of shrubs will provide immediate screening between the proposed center and surrounding multi-family units. In addition, the fencing will provide the necessary ' security for the children's play area on the north side of the center. • The site is surrounded by driveways, parking, and trash enclosures. All of the ' surrounding units are oriented with main windows and views toward Ash Creek or the south. In this situation, proposed fencing will be a better screening solution than shrubs. April 24, 1997 Interfaith Outreach CU Application Page - 8 • Cl 18.100.120 Revegetation Where natural vegetation has been removed through grading in areas not affected by the landscaping requirements, revegetation of such areas is required. Much of the site has been disturbed in the past, and the proposed plan will result in over 48% of the site being devoted to landscaping. 18.102 Visual Clearance Areas Clear vision areas must be maintained between three and eight feet in height at road/driveway intersections. The landscaping near the driveway will be lawn and street trees which will satisfy this standard as shown in Exhibit A5. 18.106 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements Section 18.106.020 General Provisions - This section details the general parking requirements: • Parking space dimensions of 8' 8"x18 " The proposed standard spaces are all 9x18 feet. • Handicapped parking One handicapped space is proposed which meets state requirements for size. It also has easy access to the front sidewalk and building entrances. • Bicycle parking of 1 space per 15 required vehicle spaces Four bicycle rack spaces will be provided near the entrance of the facility as shown in Exhibit A3. • Lighting that is directed from nearby residential uses Two pole lights are proposed for the parking lot and walkway lights will also be provided as shown in the site plan (Exhibit A3). Section 18.106.030 A.6 requires one parking space per guest room and for each employee. The two phases of the center will have a total of nine guest rooms. In addition, there will be up to five employees during the day and fewer staff members during the remainder of the day and night. Because 10 parking spaces are proposed, a variance is necessary. The justification for the variance is provided later in this application. Section 18.106.040 allows a reduction in the number of required parking spaces for a group residential use that house elderly or handicapped individuals. This is addressed as part of the variance request for parking below. Section 18.106.050 includes standards for dimensions, access, location, and surfacing for parking and loading areas. April 24, 1997 Interfaith Outreach CU Application Page - 9 The proposed parking area will meet these standards because it will be paved and marked; the two-way driveway will be a minimum of 24 feet wide; wheels stops or the equivalent will be provided; and storm water will be handled in a manner approved by the city engineer. 18.108 Access, Egress, and Circulation Section 18.108.050 requires pedestrian walkways that are safe and convenient. A separate walkway is proposed connecting the Greenburg Road sidewalk and the entrances for the office and the center. Walkways will meet ADA requirements. Section 18.108.070 requires a minimum driveway width on collectors streets of 20 feet. The driveway will be over 23 feet wide. ' 18.114 Signs Section 18.114.130 B. allows one freestanding sign of up to 32 square feet per side. The proposed freestanding sign will be less that the maximum size of 32 square feet. The final size and design will be finalized in consultation with the surrounding neighbors to address concerns about signs for the shelter. ' 18.150 Tree Removal As shown on the site survey, several trees will need to be removed to construct the project. This ' will be mitigated by the new trees proposed in the landscaping plan (Exhibit A5). 18.164.120 Utilities This section requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground. Other than connecting to utilities that are available in the Greenburg Road right-of-way, no utility ' work is proposed. 18.134 Variance ' As noted above, two variances are requested. The applicable criteria in Section 18.134.050 are listed below followed by separate findings which correspond to the variances for the side yard ' setback and the number of parking spaces. Criteria for Granting a Variance 1. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, be in conflict with policies of the comprehensive plan, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; ' 2. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; 3. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under the title and city standards (and) will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting some economic t April 24, 1997 Interfaith Outreach CU Application ' Page - 10 ' use of the land; 4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic ' land forms, or parks will not be adversely affected any more that would occur if the development were located as specified in the title; and 1 5. The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. Side Yard Setback Variance The proposed variance setback to allow a 8-foot side yard setback rather than the required 107foot setback is justified based on the following findings: ' 1. The purpose of setback requirements is to provide adequate light and air between buildings, privacy, and to meet fire code requirements. The northern side of the building is adjacent to a landscaped area and driveway that are part of the multi-family development which surrounds the site. No buildings are, or will be directly north on the adjoining property. 2. The special circumstance is the fixed location of the building and the property line. As a ' single family residence, the existing house meets the side yard setback standard of 5 feet. By developing the remainder of the site as a multi-family use and converting the residence into an office, the 10-foot standard now applies. Because the external appearance of the building ' will not be materially altered or expanded, the 8-foot setback is appropriate. 3. An incidental office use that is related to a multi-family development is permitted in CDC. All ' other setback and dimensional requirements that apply to the facility will be met or exceeded. 4. The building has been in its present location for years without having an adverse impact upon physical or natural systems. Purchasing additional land to the north would not change how the land is actually developed - the existing house, driveway, and landscaping in between would remain the same. ' 5. Compliance with the 10-foot standards would require removing or moving the building or purchasing additional property. Either of these options would impose an severe hardship with no benefit to the public or the adjoining property owner. ' Parking Variance The proposed variance to allow 10 parking spaces rather than the required 14 spaces is justified ' based on the following findings: 1. The purpose of the parking standards in the CDC is to ensure that sufficient on-site parking is provided for particular land uses so that parked vehicles related to the use do not cause congestion or safety problems on public streets or properties nearby. The operation of the center for the past eight years indicates that a very low percentage of clients have automobiles. The typical ratio of clients to vehicles is 10 to 1. Based on this experience, we anticipate that only four client spaces will be needed at any onetime. The office will be open with the maximum number of five employees during the day. In addition, clients using the center will stay during the evening and will typically be gone during the day. Therefore, the ' spaces will be shared to a certain extent by employees during the day and clients in the evening. ' Section 18.106.040 A.2. Group Care Residential Facilities, Group Residential and April 24, 1997 Interfaith Outreach CU Application ' Page - 11 ' Residential Homes, allows the approval authority to reduce the parking requirements for group residential uses "... in housing developments for elderly or handicapped persons if such reduction is deemed appropriate ..." The staff has interpreted this section to mean that ' group residential uses with other residents (i.e., homeless persons) do not qualify for this exception provision. ' Because of the low ratio of automobiles to the number of clients, the principle of this CDC section should apply to the center as well. Past experience has demonstrated that the proposed 10 spaces will be sufficient to accommodate the use. Regular Tri-Met bus service provides a viable alternative to the automobile for clients and employees. Greenburg Road is ' completely improved with sidewalks and bike lanes between Washington Square and downtown Tigard, giving clients and employees safe and convenient access to and from the ' site on foot or by bicycle. 2. Because of the configuration of the parcel, the location of the existing house, and the necessary facilities for making the center successful (e.g., child development center and ' common area), providing parking beyond the needs of the facility will be very difficult to provide. ' 3. Group residential is allowed as a conditional use in the R-12 zone. 4. Devoting less area to parking will have a positive impact on physical and natural systems primarily by reducing the amount of storm water runoff and providing more landscaped area t than otherwise would be the case. 5. As stated above, the proposed center has shown that fewer parking spaces re needed that ' other types of residential uses. The reduction of four spaces is a modest departure from the normal code requirements. ' CONCLUSION The proposed RITE Center will provide an important community service. The existing center has t been a significant community asset. The proposal satisfies all of the relevant Community Development Code criteria. k1.HD/ACT doc 290 ' INTCU.290 April 24, 1997 Interfaith Outreach CU Application Page - 12 • • 1 I 1 Exhibit A RITE Center Plans • Q u N J a P u I P m a W ¢I 01 u1 of yl N d? =a z! THE MTE CENTER ants ft'oft Outreach Sarvocaa Togard9 Oregon L CsAL ADDREW= ADDRESS, SW GR€EVBURi ROAD TIGARD, OREGON OUNER: INTERFAITH OUTREACH SERNCES P.O. BOX 730571 TIGARD, OREGON 91761 TEL, (503) 596.0359 FAX, (503) 620-9315 ATM, KIMBERLY D. 15ROIIN DIRECTORY -1 BUILDING DEPARMENT, T? ? ILDING DEPARTMENT 9 Y OF H TIGARD, OREGON 91773 TEL:(503) 639.4111 ATTN PLANING DEPARTMENT, CITY OF TIGA D, PLANING DEPARTMENT SW WALL BLVD. BOY , OREGON 91773 TIGARD TEL:(503) 639.4n1 ATM, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, DEPARTMENT OF WEALTH 4 HUMAN SERVICES 155 N FIRST AVE. HILLSBORO, OREGON TEL(503) 646.6177 ATTN, TORY HAFMS FIRE DEPARTMENT, TUA-ATIN VALLEY FIRE RESCUE 70669 SE ELAITON ALOHA OREGON TEL,(503)6AS-0511 ATT1L PUBLIC WORCS DEPARTMENT, CITT OF TIGARA: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (SitffETB9ESER) TIGARD OFIEGON 91733 TEL(803) ATM, WATER DEPARTMENT: CITY D SW H TGARD, OREGON 91773 TEL4503)639-Anl AiTW GAS COMPANY, NORTHWEST NATURAL GAS COMPANY 770 NW 7TH POR LA?D, OREGON 91709 TEL,(003) 171.7455 ATTFL ERNIE SWARTZ ELECTRC COMPANY, PO TL GENERAL ELECTRIC 1 WRC - 0006 PORfLA?D, OREGON 91704 TEL:(503) 464-5581 ATTN, MAfdENE STEVENS OJ CT TEAM ARCHITECTS: ARCHITECTS VAN LOM/EDWAROS AIAPC. 34 NAA FIRST AVENUE, 'SUITE 309 PORTLAND, OREGON 91709 TEL: (503) 776.0599 FAX, (5031 713.8649 ATTH, SID SCOTT CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE, I SUITE 409 177 SW SEC-ONO AVE. PORTLAND, OREGON 91704 TEL: (903) 7761357 FAX; (503)775-1365 ATM: JIM RAPP STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS. WALKER/DILORETO)YCUNIE, INC. WILLAMETTE PARK PLAZA 6470 &W. MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 360 PORTLAND, OREGON 91701 TEL: (503)168.3930 FA76 (503) 168-3979 ATM: DALE DILORETO MECHANICAL a ELECTRICAL INTERFACE ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS, 6542 SE LAJQ- ROAD ILUAIKIE, OREGON 91777 M ' TEL, (503) 659.6394 FAX, (503) 659-TIMS ATM, CIVIL ENGINEERS: WALKEFLIDILORETO/TOUNIE, INC. WILLAMETTE PAW PLAZA 6470 SID. MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 360 PORTLAND. OREGON 91701 TEL (503)165.3930 FAX: (503) 1663979 ATM, DALE OILORETO FfRQJ CT ATA DESCRIPTION OF WORK- CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW BUILDING BUILDING CODE: UBC,1994 EDITION W/ 1996 OREGON STRUCTURAL SPECIALTY CODE PLUMBING CODE, UPC, 1594 EDITION ELECTRIC CODE, NEG. 1994 EDITION MECHANICAL CODE; U'IC, 594 EDITION ADA GUIDELINES) OREGON AMENDMENTS HANDICAP LADE, ZONING CLABBIFICATIO, R-O, MULTI-PAMILY RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY, R-1 CONSTRUCTION TYPE, V-N SEISMIC ZONE 3 FROST LINE: ROOF LOAD, 75 PSFLL, --PSF/DL SITE AREA 17 ACRE (31363 SF) S% (9 000 SF) PHASE 4 B BUILDING COVERAGE . , PHASE 7: 743% (1,630 SF) IMPERVIOUS SURFACES LANDSCAPING 717% PHASE It 56.S% (11,059 SF) PHASE 7. 455% (0775 6F) ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT, 35 FEET ACTUAL BUILDING HEIGHT, 74 FEET PARKUG PROVIDED: 9 SPACES 13 STANDARD HANDICAP SPACE 10 TOTAL PAR@G SPACES INDEX --1 Al COVER SHEET AP EX15TING SITE SURVEY 413 SITE PLAN A4 GRADING 4 UTILITIES AS LANDSCAPE PLAN A6 PHASE IFLOOR PLAN Al PHASE 2 FLOOR PLAN AS BUILDING ELEVATIONS L.i. W Z' W' V W oC W Ln W V W 2 fA,f O Z O W OC .50 W Q Q 0 r Q I N I "m 8 Z 0 m v m i c a r a W_ a? al ul i o? rc? r\ ?S • i I.E. 24" CONC OUT NE. = 153.73' EXISTING SITE SURVEY I."30, TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SITUATED IN THE N.E. 1 /4 S.W. 1 /4 SECTION 35, T. 1 S., R. 1 W., W.M. CITY OF TIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON SURVEYED: MARCH 11, 1997 LEGEND SANITARY SEWER NOTES Q RIM ELEV. = 166.25' LE. 12" CONC IN S. = 157.19' E. 12" CONC OUT N. = 157.15' O RIM ELEV. = 160.66' I.E. 12" CONC IN S. = 153.31' I.E. 12" CONC OUT N. = 153.16' STORM DRAINAGE NOTES 0 RIM ELEV. = 171.94' E. 18 CONC IN SE. = 168.27' E. 18 CONC OUT N. = 168.14' O RIM ELEV. = 164.31' I.E. 18" CONC IN S. = 158.86' I.E. 12" CONC IN E. = 158.96' I.E. 24" CONC OUT N. = 158.72' O RIM ELEV. = 161.04' I.E. 24" CONC IN S. = 156.94' I.E. 12" CONC IN NW. = 15'7.03' I.E. 24" CONC OUT N. = 156.89' -SAN- - SANITARY SEWER LINE -WAT- - WATER LINE - OHW- - OVERHEAD POWER LINES STORM SEWER LINE - - - FENCELINE wv DQ - WATER VALVE ® - CATCH BASIN 0 - SANITARY MANHOLE (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) - DECIDUOUS TREE - CONIFEROUS TREE - SIGN 4 - UTILITY POLE ? - GUY ANCHOR 0 - MAIL BOX EB - WATER METER ® - TRAFFIC SIGNAL - BOLLARD Q - CABLE TV RISER ® - TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX ® - TELEPHONE RISER D.I. - DUCTILE IRON PIPE @ GRATE ELEV. = 174.36' I.E. 18" CONC IN S. = 170.61' I.E. 12" CONC IN W. = 171.61' I.E. 18" CONC OUT N. = 170.56' OGRATE ELEV. = 171.91' I.E. 18' CONC IN S. = 169.01' LE 18" CONC OUT NW. = 168.81 T. GRATE ELEV. = 163.68' 12" CONC OUT NW. = 161.23' @ GRATE ELEV. = 158.68' I.E. 24" CONC IN SW. = 153.18' I.E. 24" CONC OUT NE. = 153.08' SURVEY PREPARED BY: G & L LAND SURVEYING, INC. 8116 S.W. NIMBUS AVE. BEAVERTON, OREGON 97008 PHONE: 641-0308 JOB #1728 N U c! me W S V o WOW C " = CV 0 04 Q o I N (Zan 9 n v r O I 7 I K m Al l a a of Y I' Z ms? v?rY d w? i IL LEGEND EXISTING CURB CUT, 8 ENTRY GAZEBO REDUCED TO ALLOW 23'-10" 9 BIKE RACK DRIVEWAY 10 PLAYGROUND 2 ENTRANCE DRIVEWAY II NEW SHELTER FACILITY 3 PARKING 12 PATIO 4 LIGHT POLE 14' HIGH 13 PHASE 2 FUTURE EXPANSION 5 TRASH ENCLOSURE 14 WALKWAY SIGN 6 DETENTION POND IS MONUMENT SIGN I EXISTING HOUSE W/ 16 FENCE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES ?7 I 1 1 O I • , r PROPERTY LINE I? ?I L IL a > ,- - - - - - - - -?. _ r ?` Iu a I I, , 9 lol .b vtl I ? T ?? 13 ------? Im 0 SITE PLAN NORTH r B' b' 37' f=HA5E 1 4 2 N OC ? W -C co V Oo LLJ o oC '? o LLJ ad = CV 1 1 o Q a z m N O 2 0 7 n ?pC O CI m J Q u n P P n a o'I 01 Y? 2 Q m? f K N QQ • • aAll,T. Z4" 5T. ? I! I r ,l r emem 21"ST, D. _ I w? nk'T. 4.5. NEW Si. D. lANNecmg I I I ? I ez1yT. c.p. ? ? (I Ii I II LXIST. (rA°i --} I I` I I I EXKT,SS.? I 1 0xwr. 24B 0.I b1llyT. 16" P. I. WrtrM- ?12° D.1. wAn . ovr?er u7rtao? OM1IPkE 41RYLNR6. XKT. GK 6EwkE 7e p.E?.Ww . r I NeW 144" wn- ? - exw r. 12° 0.1. WAnsL: 'rUALInN VAWCY WATEG- DKT. EXIST. 18" tT. D. PROPERTY LINE II CONCEPTUAL UTILITIES PLAN M1M141 L? NORTW 0 B' 16' 37' to" V ? V ctf V L Oo LLJ W O w/ 7.. + C V 0 Q z 1s ? I z °o 7 ai O 1 ' m W J a .J n N Z P a a n u? of Y I 2 a ?. m H? N 1? w =L Y'r • 0 ? ?f916?Fi C uK,URG &L40 tNCr/ APrA ,V-eHI&I+ &PAi, WP-M V rgeff ,/ ? I• I• -T kf1w LANDSCAPE LEGEND SYMBOL COMMON NAME SIZE/COND. SPACING TREES BOTANICAL NAME KT KATSURA TREE 2" CAL. AS SHOWN CERCIDIPHYLLUM JAPONICUM RSP REDSPIRE PEAR 2" CAL. 25'0.C. PYRUS CALLERYANA SEEDED/SOD LAWN GRASS BERM 5' fflet+ rE74-66 LANDSCAPE PLAN NORTH V V I ?-Ir Vf V oC LU V V L OO W W ? ? w? ay p = CU 9 0 to Q O Z 4L1 m = Y 0 7 0 ? w a cu s P a b of Y I Z i? N 4? d ds y0 a? 0 0 LEGEND I FRONT PORCH 11 STORAGE/MECHANICAL 2 ENTRY 13 HALL 3 RECEPTION 14 HEALTH ROOM 4 MANAGER'S OFFICE 15 LAUNDRY 5 CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER 16 GUEST ROOM 6 CHILD DEVELOPMENT OFFICE 11 MEN SNOWER/tOILET ROOM T RESTROOM IS WOMEN SHOWER/TOILET ROOM 8 LIVING/DINING ROOM 19 PATIO 9 KITCHEN 20 PLAYGROUND 10 COOLER/FREEZER 21 PHASE 2 FUTURE EXPANSION II PANTRY ? I ++ I ? ? I I I ?( I I D r I ? I I 0 I o I I r OFR PLAN' 1cro sr NORTH 0 3' 10' 70' PHASE io l 11-1111 ? I I Iq i i I ®I I PROPERTY LINE N V Q) A' Cie u as V L W W 0 C cd p LiJ = CU a 0 Q c z d Z 0 P J O C LEGEND I FRONT PORCH 14 HEALTH ROOM 2 ENTRY 15 LAUNDRY 3 RECEPTION I6 GUEST ROOM 4 MANAGER'S OFFICE IT MEN SHOUIER/TOILET ROOM 5 CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER IB WOMEN SHOUIER/TOILET ROOM b CHILD DEVELOPMENT OFFICE 19 PATIO I RESTROOM 20 PLAYGROUND 8 LIVING/DINING ROOM 21 "COAT CLOSET" 9 KITCHEN 22 SORTING 10 COOLER/FREEZER 23 PUBLIC RESTROOM II PANTRY 24 MANAGER APARTMENT 12 5TORAGE/MECHANICAL 25 RESTROOM 13 HALL PROPERLY LINE m J J I (U P P 6 a a w a o' Y ? 2 i? r d fa a' z[ FLOOR PLANS ??J' ory.yu, , ,?'^ PHASE 2 0 9 t- ?I N oG FW" V cd v L 0o W S0 oL ' M r..,- LLJ Cie = CU 0 Q 0 2 0 I N I r 0 D i x?? m W a N P T 6 a? of i u? o? Y? H N t? ?sLLU w Z u. i i 41---- - NORTH ELEVATION SOUTN ELEVATION i O I ® I ® I Hill 1111111111 H I IM LEGEND I ENTRY GAZEBO 2 PLAYGROUND FENCE 3 FRONT PORCH 4 PHASE 2 FUTURE EXPANSION 5 COMPOSITION SHINGLES 6 BOARD 4 BATTEN SIDING 1 LAP SIDING 6 VINYL WINDOWS S WALL LIGHTS 10 WOOD/GLASS DOOR II METAL DOOR 12 ATTIC VENT 13 PLAYGROUND livJ1 V CL ? ?. V O W W O Cie ? ` LL.J 1 6 00 Q 0 ama O' d z O 7 I N I T ID O K EAST ELEVATION ' Exhibit B RITE Center Programs 444416 '00 1504 P.06 • • ' INTERFAITH OUTREACH SERVICES Program Description Interfaith Outreach Services provides comprehensive, professional, family based services ' that address the multiple issues homeless persons face as they work towards independence. IOS is committed to the four principles of Responsibility, AccountabilitY, Partnership and Courage in its approach to resolving homelessness. Responsibility for actions, Accountability to hinders, Partnership with the community and Courage to ' change systems that simply appease the poverty stricken to systems that eradicate it. Through innovative programming interfaith Outreach Services moves with homeless persons from the hopelessness of poverty to the power of independence. ' SELF-SUFFICIENCY PROGRAM The Self-Sufficiency Program is designed to break the cycle of homelessness and poverty by addressing each program participant's specific individual issues that directly affect the ' families stability. The program uses a PHASED approach designed to assess participant readiness, needs, goals and develop a long-term partnership leading from crisis to stability ' and independence. EHASF,l(first week) Participants enter program through process of outreach, intake and assessment- Q=o& Through a coordinated effort between Law Enforcement, Citizen Involvement ' Teams, Local Government, Business Owners, Parks and Recreation Personnel, Public Works Personnel and Interfaith Outreach Services, homeless persons are identified An outreach worker visits camps and other areas where homeless persons are living, including t the Severe Weather Shelter, to begin an engagement process to determine initial emergency needs. As a trust relationship is developed, the worker conducts a needs assessment and makes appropriate referrals, including participation in the Self-Sufficiency t Program. Intake; The Self Sufficiency Coordinator interviews applicants and assesses current needs 1 and fitness for project Self-Sufficiency. • Self-Sufficiency Coordinator and participants develop a one-week ' action plan focusing on stabilizing individuals. This plan may include: -Appointment with Adult and Family Services to apply for entitlements. -Obtaining, needed identification. ' -Worldng in a Day Labor program. 444416 '00 15:04 • • Interfaith Outreach Services Program Description Page 2 P.07 -Enrolling children in school and in IOS' Child Development Program. -Addressing health needs at IOS' Health Clinic. -Acquiring needed clothing, shoes, school supplies, etc., through IOS' Emergency Services program ' A.1-the compictim of Phase-I: .Each client will meet with the Program Coordinator to complete an "Evaluation and Recommendation" form, which will be reviewed at subsequent weekly case ' meetings. -Participants move in one of three directions. waiting Pgdod' Participants with domestic violence problems or problems of severe ' alcohol and drug abuse will apply for an appropriate program while transferred to the Severe Weather Shelter until they can enter the appropriate special needs program. t Pave the'ShelteL Participants who are inappropri ate for the program (due to breaking i . the rules, etc.), or who have not self-identified specific issues hindering their progress will leave the program. Phase 11 (all other clients) ' During the 3-6 weeks of Phase U: -Participants and the Program Coordinator develop an "Action Plan" consisting of the goals and objectives to be worked on for the remainder of their program. -participants will meet daily with the Program Coordinator to solve problems, receive support and advocacy and track progress. Phase II action plans may include: -Meeting with pre-employment counselor to complete a resume and practice interview and job search skills. -Attendance at NA/AA and/or other recovery programs. -Attendance at play therapy appointments for children at the Child Development Center. -Attend Pre-employment workshop. ' -Work on credit issues. -Participate in the Together in Literacy, Family Literacy Program. 1 -Attend PLUS Workshop Series 444416 '00 1505 P.08 ' Interfaith Outreach Services Program Description Page 3 -Application for subsidized housing, transitional housing and/or permanent ' housing. -Job search. -Starting a savings account and learning skills in maintaining a bank account. ' -Work on parenting, mental health, and other personal issues. -Attendance at Housing Location Workshops to learn skills in locating housing ' and in Landlord/Tenant rights. At the completion of Phase II, clients will move into Phase III. ' Phase TIT (9 months to 2 years) wig increase the success of participants in maintaining stabilized housing and decrease the likelihood of continued episodes of homelessness. ' Phase III will include one of the following as appropriate: For up to one year as participants ' stabilize into permanent housing. permanent asin,g iemenW AssistAnrP for Facilitiea to ASaiSt the HoIneleSS ?c zwyw ' (.QAFAHI Case Mwagement: Participants will be referred to Washington County Community Actions' 2 year case management program. ' T nsitional Hm1gng Participants will move into transitional housing with continued support services. ' Subsidi7gd Housing- Participants receiving a Section 8 certificate will move into subsidized housing with continued support services. ' Anothm&nS : Participants with on-going needs will be referred to another program, such as assisted living. ' Phase III will also include the following, as needed: -Limited Emergency Services. -Continued participation in the Child Development Program. ' -Assistance in acquiring fiuniture, bedding, kitchen items, etc. -Crisis intervention. -Information and referral. 1 C14€16 '00 1505 P'09 Interfaith Outreach Services ' Program Description Page 4 ' -Continued stabilization support, CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ' Children comprise the fastest growing homeless population today. Their lives are dominated by a seemingly insurmountable poverty that is characterized by domestic violence, child abuse, substance abuse, foster care, chronic health problems. It is ' inadequate education, however, which cripples a family's ability to survive. Education can provide a viable exit from poverty. ' The Child Development Center serves both infant and pre-school children. It incorporates a child centered curriculum that nurtures homeless children's cognitive, social and physical growth and builds a strong foundation for future learning. PRE-EMPLOYMENT WORKSHOPS ' Participants will attend a pre-employment, week long workshop before beginning their i d ress ng employment search. The workshop helps participants become job ready by ad such issues as researching and choosing a career, assessing skills, experiences and work- related preferences, writing resumes and cover letters, interviewing and meeting on-the- job performance standards. The workshop gives participants the opportunity to be self- reflective and to think about their skills and interests, as well as issues such as child care ' needs, work and educational experiences which may influence their employment options. THE TOGETHER IN LEARNING (TIL) FAMILY LITERACY PROGRAM ' This program uses a learner-directed curriculum to teach homeless persons the literacy skills they need to gain employment and independence. Parents and children participate together in activities designed to promote learning as a family. The goal of the program is ' to reduce the long-term educational risks facing homeless families by developing the literacy skill of parents and promoting learning as a shared family value. ' PRACTICAL LIVINGIUSEFUL SK MLS WORKSHOP This series enhances the independent living skills of homeless persons by giving them the knowledge, skills and confidence needed to break the cycle of dependence and maintain ' permanent housing. Curricula consists of the following six workshops each with 6 sessions: -Parenting ' -Stress Management -Women, Sex, HIV/AIDS -Family Violence t 4€0416 '00 15=06 1 Interfaith Outreach Services ' Program Description Page 5 -Unlock the Door to Housing -Family Health • P.10 ,RESIDENTIAL CENTER The IOS Residential Center is currently located in the Tigard United Methodist Church. A new building is scheduled for completion in July, 1997. The Center houses homeless families and individuals who are enrolled in the IOS Self-Sufficiency Program. The program is designed to address the multiple and varied causes of homelessness. The program extends to families for up to one year after moving to permanent housing. The center is staffed by volunteer Overnight hosts and meal providers. It has a capacity of 14. During the course of a year we will house, on the average, over 250 individuals. HEAL'T'H CARE Health Services are provided on site at the IOS Health Clinic. Services include complete medical examinations, follow-up care, prescriptions, preventive care, education and referrals. EMERGENCY SERVICES . IOS offers a variety of emergency services. These services include: crisis intervention, information and referral, transportation, laundry and clothing vouchers, and food boxes. Prevention services and rent assistance are provided in partnership with other agencies. LOOKING TOWARD THE FUTURE Residential Independence Training and Education (RITE) Center Currently IOS is functioning using scattered sites ill-equipped for residential, program and storage. use. This causes time, organizational and cost efficiency problems. IOS will be losing its existing residential space, currently located at the Tigard United Methodist Church, in the summer of 1997. This problem also presents an opportunity. IOS is purchasing property for the construction of a new facility, the Residential Independence Training and Education (RITE) Center. This tremendous opportunity will allow us to consolidate and expand in the following ways: -All current programs and Administrative Offices will function from one site. -The residential capacity will double. -The RITE Center will be the first handicapped accessible residential program for homeless persons in the county. ' 118116 '00 15.07 • P.11 ' Interfaith Outreach Services Program Description ' Page 6 Most importantly however will be the ability to provide additional services to fill community resource gaps that are currently keeping many people trapped in ' poverty. On-site comprehensive family based services will be provided at the RITE Center to equip ' homeless families and singles with the education and tools they need to break the cycle of dependency and begin a new cycle of stability and independent living. These include: Health Services -jump Start Child Development Center -Accelerated After-School Program -The Family Reunification Program -Together in Yearning Family Literacy Program -Pre-employment 'gaining Workshop -Employment/Training Program -Practical Living/Useful Skills Workshop Series -Aftercare Support Services in Permanent Housing In addition IOS will continue its present services including our successful Self-Sufficiency Program. • • AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN (-,).CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING. RLMJRN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: ...:...... Planning Division . . 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, • -:.. Tigard, OR 97223 I, 4 do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a pr posed affecting the land located at (state the ap roximate location(s) if no rep (s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) ,and did on the day of \ , 19 C personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a J,)-"P. rm? application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLEMNOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of UMC A- , 19u. ICIAL SEAL CHAPMAN Y:M:ARY PUBLIC-OREGON SION NO.055006 PIRES JUN 29, 2000 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREG N My Commission Expires: to -2-A -2-0 0 0 (applicant, please complete infor=adon below for proper placement with proposed project) --------------------------- ME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPlMN-T: Name ofApphc=ttOwner. I Address or General Location of Subject Property: l LSubject P:ooer.-r Taz liaD(s) and Lot -,W: -----------------------------------------------J ---------- n.logm?paay4rascus?'post.rrsc (state location you posted notice on property) • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) SS. City of Tigard ) 1, and say that od Wat-t1h 19-92 of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a development at (or a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto • . being duly sworn, depose I caused to have mailed to each meeting to discuss a proposed made a part of hereof. 1 further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at n , with postage prepaid thereon. k'llf i L Ly'a-14 - V10 Signature (in the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETEINOTARIZE) Subscribed and swom/afirmed before me on the ?J day of VAMG? - , 19 ? OFFICIAL SEAL MARY CHAPMAN NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON 1 COMMISSION N0.055006 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUN 29, 2000 NOTARY PUBLIC OF ORE ON My Commission Expires: (a -ZqL 2-0 6(0 (Applicant. please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project-) ------------------------=------=------------------------------ : XAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED N NE: I TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOP-HEN T: 'Name of Applicant Owner: I ? Add.-ess or General Lacatioa of Subject -Properrr. Sub..ecc Prope_.y Tax.Nlaois) and Lot T(s): -------------------------------------------------------- --? - n:voain?azRVVtuxa?t?rnatl rut • • Pr 'N ["K I FAI w lit ?o ,moo r? '7 04-0 C? OEM* to Icc all i ,Iwo, Too Gk1 0 io a: March 5, 1997 RE: Interfaith Outreach Services Residential Independence Training and Education (RITE) Center Project Dear Interested Party. Interfaith Outreach Services with the communities of Tigard, Tualatin and Beaverton are undertaking a project to build a Residential Independence Training and Education Center for homeless families and individuals in Eastern Washington County. The facilitywill replace the current shelter facility that has been located in the Tigard United Methodist Church for the past eight years. The Arclutectural firm of Van Lom/Edwards is representing Interfaith Outreach Services who is purchasing the property located at 11130 and 11070 SW Greenburg Rd. in Tigard. We are proposing a 7,500 square foot, one story- Residential Shelter which will also house Self-Sufficiency Program services. Program offices will be located in the existing two story house on the property. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal in detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting to discuss this project on: DATE: Wednesday, March 26, 1997 LOCATION: IOS Office 9020 SW Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223 Between Hall Blvd. and Main Street TIME: 7:OOPM Please note that this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We will have a project description available for you at the March 26th meeting. We look forward to more specifically discussing this proposal with you. For more information please contact IOS Executive Director. Kim Brown at 598-0359. Sincerely. Kim Brown, Executive Director "From the hopelessness of poverty to the power of independence." I J 0 l+:tthy Godfrey 7435 SW Harmom Ti=ard, OR WM 620-8593 (N) 'Mark Mahon 11310 SW 91st Tigard, OR 97323 684.6102 p 244-2000 6Y) • 24.1.0'756 (F) Shb* Ewart 124811 SW Hoodview Drive Tlgard.OR MM 6S4-2&U (1) 293-68% (VV) -MMMCENTRAi. Bob Bledsoe 11800 SW Walnut Tigard, OR 97M 590-2340 DA Jim Correll I3S21 SW Ntiche& Court Tigard, OR 97223 524.9870 (H) 288.5174, Eat- 192 (W) Cr* Dirkxu 9131 SW Atli Sweet Tigard, OR 9=13 620-4829 (H) 423-3993. Ext. 22939 (1i) 69:-1799 (Fax - Jac1de) Pamela.Movers 14718 SNV Grandview Lane Tigard. OR 971-24 90-3102 (M 624-9595 (F) CIT F??C41TATO S so Sue Carve 10155 SW Hoodview Drive Tigard, OR 97224 6395507 (M Sterling Harsh 14090 SW 80th Court Tigard, OR 97224 639-7739 (H) 280-6300 (tiv) Jobe Williams 11305 SW 121st Avenue Turd, OR 97224 S90_37'_5 (H) 612-5611 (%V) Post-it- Fax Note 7671 Date * of To c Fro Co. 'o. Amene A PhOn6 Fax a Fa( # Revised V97 i:ladm?joibd&comn.dac I Site NO SITE.ADDRESS* Mail :4550 SW LOMBARD AVE BEAVERTON OR 97005 Use :9902 RES,COMMON PROP,PLANNED COMMUNITY Legal:ASH CREEK CONDOMINIUM, COMMON :ELEMENT,'N0N-ASSESSABLE Census:Tract Block MapGrid: Bedrm: Bth: YS: Gar: Pool- * 2 * ------------------- : MetroScan/Washington Owner:WESTCOTT DAVID R Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS* Mail :5828 SW CHELTENHAM DR PORTLAND OR 97201 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Lega1:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 113 Census:Tract Block MapGrid: Sedrm:l Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool- * 3 * ------------------- : MetroScan/Washington Owner:MITCHELL RONALD P Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS* Mail :14970 SW 109TH AVE TIGARD OR 97224 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 125 Census:Tract Block MapGrid: Bedrm:2 Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 4 * ------------------- : MetroScan/Washington Owner:RHEAULT BARRY ROBERT & JANET LEE Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS* Mail :17380 SW HART WAY ALOHA OR 97007 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legs1:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, TNT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 126 Census:Tract Block MapGrid: Sedrm:2 Sth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 5 * ------------------- : MetroScan/Washington Owner:MARSH ALGER HERBERT Site :*NC SITE ADDRESS* Mail :2590 WARWICK ST WEST LIMN OR 97068 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIL'MS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, TNT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 127 Census:Tract Block MapGrid: Bedrm:2 Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: X f#d . Price . Tot AV : Taxes Phone RefPar#:1S135CA 90000 B1dgSF: . Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164331 Xferd : Price :$14,500 Tot AV :$40,150 Taxes :$555.82 Phone RefPar#:1S135CA 90113 B1dgSF:596 Ac- ---------------------------- Parcel Parcel :R1164377 Xferd :01/03/95 Price . Tot AV :$51,080 Taxes :$707.14 Phone :503-639-0112 RefPar#:1S135CA 90125 B1dgSF:856 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164386 Xferd :01/02/97 Price :$54,150 Tot AV :$51,080 Taxes :$707.14 Phone . RefPar#:1S135CA 90126 B1dgSF:856 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164395 Xferd . Price :$49,950 Tot AV :$53,450 Taxes :$739.95 Phone :503-657-4141 RefPar#:1S135CA 90127 B1dgSF:656 Ac: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 6 * ------------------- : MetroScan/washington : ----------------------------* )wner:WILHELM FREDDIE R Parcel :R1164456 'ite :*NO SITE ADDRESS* Xferd :11/08/96 Mail :11150 SW GREENBURG RD #150 TIGARD OR 97223 Price :$54,900 Jse :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS 'jegal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK C, LOT 150 lensus:Tract Block MapGrid: 3edrm:2 Sth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: 4 7 * ------------------- : MetroScan/Washington Dwner:ACORD JON & SUSAN M Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS* Mail :10496 SE 98TH CT PORTLAND OR 97266 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 206 Census:Tract Block MapGrid: Bedrm:l Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 8 * ------------------- : MetroScan/Washington Owner:BECCHETTI JOHN J & MARY Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS* Mail :3300 WEBSTER ST OAKLAND CA 94609 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Lega1:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 207 Census:Tract Block MapGrid: Bedrm:1 Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 9 * ------------------- • MetroScan/Washington Owner:AAZAD ALI Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS* Tot AV :$53,450 Taxes :$739.95 Phone . RefPar#:1S135CA 90150 B1dgSF:856 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164509 Xferd :12/23/93 Price :$35,000 Tot AV :$42,520 Taxes :$588.62 Phone . RefPar#:1S135CA 90206 B1dgSF:596 AC: ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164518 Xferd . Price :$39,950 Tot AV :$42,520 Taxes :$588.62 Phone :510-834-7421 RefPar#:1S135CA 90207 B1dgSF:596 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164527 Xferd :09/09/94 Mail :11040 SW GREENBURG RD #208 TIGARD OR 97223 Price :$42,900 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 208 Census:Tract Block MapGrid: Sedrm:l Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 10 * ------------------ • MetroScan/Washington Owner:WESTCOTT DAVID R Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS* Mail :5828 SW CHELTENHAM DR PORTLAND OR 97201 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 217 Cernsus:Tract Block MapGrid: Sedrm:l Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool Tot AV :$42,520 Taxes :$588.62 Phone . RefPar#:1S135CA 90208 B1dgSF:596 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164536 Xferd . Price :$14,5.00 Tot AV :$42,520 Taxes :$588.62 Phone . RefPar#:1S135CA 90217 B1dgSF:596 Ac: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • * 61 * --- : MetroScan/Washington Owner:PAINTER.ALLEN C & JANET SUE Site :11150.$W GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :3111 SE TINDALL CIR PORTLAND OR 97202 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK C, LOT 358 Cenaus:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bedrm:2 Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool; * 62 * ---------------• MetroScan/Washington Owner:5LOAN THOMAS J & DELLA J Site :11150 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :PO BOX 610 PACIFIC CITY OR 97135 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 115 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bed,rm:l Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 63 *__________________; MetroScan/Washington Owner:BYRNS GEORGE F Site :11160 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :11048 SW GREENBURG RD #140 TIGARD OR 972: Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 140 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bedrm:2 Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 64 * ------------------ ; MetroScan/Washington Owner:CHAPMAN JOHN H & ELAINE L F-4356 Site :11160 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :10112 SW TRAPPER TER BEAVERTON OR 97008 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 232 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Sedrm:2 Sth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 65 * -------.------- MetroScan/Washington Owner:LANGFUS AARON Site :11200 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :PO BOX 2092 PORTLAND OR 97208 Use :7012 RES,MULTIPLE HOUSING,IMPROVEMENTS Legal:ACRES 2.51 Census:Tract 309 Bedrm: Bth: • Parcel :R1°164858 -* Xf erd . Price :$48,950 Tot AV :$53,450 Taxes :$739.95 Phone :50.3-231-0875 D2 RefPar## : iS135CA 90358 B1dgSF:856 Ac:' ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164359 Xferd :05/23/96 Price :$49,000 Tot AV :$42,520 Taxes $588.62 Phone D2 Ref Par#:1S135CA 90115 BldgSF:596 Ac: .---- --------* Parcel :81164448 Xferd :10/13/93 3 Price :$38,000 Tot AV :$53,450 Taxes :$739.95 Phone : 02 Ref Par#:1S135CA 90140 B1dgSF:856 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164607 Xferd . Price :$43,501 Tot AV :$53,450 Taxes' :$739.95 Phone D2 Ref Par#:1S135CA 90232 BldgSF:856 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R0274054 Xf erd Price Tot AV :$2,035,370 Taxes :$28,176.86 Phone 00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 D3 Ref Par#:1S135CA 00600 YB: Gar: Pool: BldgSF: Ac-2-51 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • * 56 *------------------: MetroScan/Washington . Owner:ENZOR NORMAN RAY Site :11150 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :11150 SW GREENBURG RD #149 TIGARD OR 97223 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK C, LOT 149 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bedrm:l Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 57 * ------------------. MetroScan/Washington Owner:REDDICK BRUCE E Site :11150 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :PO BOX 2018 BEAVERTON OR 97075 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT°IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK C, LOT 151 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bedrm%l Bth:1.00.YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 58 *------------------. MetroScan/Washington Owner:SERGEYEVA YELENA B Site :11150 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 • ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164457 Xferd :11/10/93 Price :$40,300 Tot AV :$42,520 Taxes :$588.62 Phone . D2 Ref Pax#:lS135CA 90149 B1dgSF:596 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :81164475 Xferd :02/27/96 Price :$30,500 Tot AV :$42,520 Taxes $588.62 Phone ; D2 RefPar#:1S135CA 90151 B1dgSF:596 Ac: . ---------------------------- Parcel :81164876 Xferd :08/17/95 Mail :11150 SW GREENBURG RD #360 TIGARD OR 97223 Price :$56 000 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK C, LOT 360 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bedrm:2 Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 59 * ------------------------------------- MetroScan/washington Owner:LUTE STEVEN C Site :11150 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :11150 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD OR 97223 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS - Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, TNT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK C,.LOT 152 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bedrm:2 Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 60 *.------------------: MetroScan/Washington Owner:LAWHORN RAYMOND T Tot AV :$53,450 Taxes :$739.95 Phone . D2 RefPar#:1S135CA 90360 B1dgSF:856 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164984 Xferd :04/14/93 Price :$47,000 Tot AV :$51,080 Taxes :$707.14 Phone . D2 RefPar#:1S135CA 90152 B1dgSP:856 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164652 Site :11150 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Xferd Mail :11150 SW GREENBURG RD #253 T IGARD OR 97223 Price :$35,423 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Tot AV :$42,520 Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK C, LOT 253 Taxes :$588.62 Phone Cenaus:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 D2 RefPar4 :1S135CA 90253 Sedrm:l Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: B1dgSF:596 Ac: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * 51 * ----,--- -------- MetroScan/Washington Owner:ATLAS MARK CJ . ---------------------------- * Parcel :R1164812 Xferd :08/15/94 Price :$43,00.0 Tot AV :$53,450 Site :11048 SW GREENBURG RD #346 TIGARD 97223 Mail :11048 SW GREENBURG RD #346 TIGARD OR 97223 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 346 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Sedrm:2 Sth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 52 * ------------------ : MetroScan/Washington Owner:KIRKMAN JAY M Site :11070 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :11130 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD OR 97223 Use :7012 RES,MULTIPLE HOUSING,IMPROVEMENTS Legal:ACRES ..53 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bedrm:5 Bth:1.00 YB:1930 Gar: Pool: * 53 * ------------------ ; MetroScan/Washington Owner:ROBINSON E LEE EVELYN L Site :11101 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :15375 NW WEST UNION RD PORTLAND OR 97229 Use :2312 MISC,NON-MFG,IMPROVEMENT,IND ZONE Legal:ACRES 4.72 Censue:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Gar: Pool: * 54 * ------------------ . MetroScan/Washington Owner:FOREIGN MISSION FOUNDATION Site :11143 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :10875 $W 89TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 Use :.1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS LeQal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, TNT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 101 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bedrm:l Bth:1.00 Y13:1979 Gar: Pool.: * 55 *-----------------: MetroScan/Washington Owner.SEAMAN"MARK H & LYNN & TRUSTEE Site :11150 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :8407 SW 58TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97219 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Lega1:A.SH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, TNT IN Taxes :$739.95 Phone D2 Ref Par#:1S135CA 90346 B1dgSF:856 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :80272966 Xferd :02/16/96 Price . Tot AV :$148,010 Taxes :$2,048.99 Phone . D2 Ref Par#:1S135CA 02600 B1dgSF:1,592 Ac:-53 ---------------------------- Parcel :R0273126 Xferd Price Tot AV :$2,058,880 Taxes :$28,502.30 Phone . D2 Refpar#:1S135BC 01100 B1dgSF: AC:4.72 . ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164297 Xferd Price Tot AV :$40,150 Taxes :$555.82 Phone . D2 Refpar#:1S135CA 90101 BldgSF:596 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164661 Xferd . Price :$.47,450 Tot AV :$53,450 :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK C, LOT 254 Taxes :$739.95 Phone :503-246-9890 Census:Tract 305.00 Block 1 MapGrid;655 D2 Ref Par#:1S135CA 90254 Bedrm:2 Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: B1dgSF:856 Ac: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * 46 *------------------; MetroScan/Washington .--------------_---_-___-----* Owner:ROWLANDS CLEMENT B II Parcel :81164830 Site. :11048 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Xferd :10/16/89 Mail :11048 SW GREENBURG RD #348 TIGARD.OR 97223 Price •$24 500 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 348 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bedrm:2 Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 47-*------------------: MetroScan/Washington Owner:KOGAN GRIGORY & ALEXANDRA Site :11048 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :4312 SW TERLYN CT PORTLAND OR 97221 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 347 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 8edrm:2 Bth:3-00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 48 * ------------------ : MetroScan/Washington Owner:SMITH CHERYL A Site :11048 SW GREENBURG RD PORTLAND 97223 Mail :11048 SW GREENBURG RD #137 PORTLAND OR 9 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 137 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bedrm:2 Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 49 * ------------. MetroScan/Washington Owner:THORNTON CHRISTINE & JASON Site :11048 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :11048 SW GREENSURG RD TIGARD OR 97223 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS . Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 242 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bedrm:2 Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 50 * ------------------ : MetroScan/Washington Owner:PARKER DAVID HORACE Site :11048 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :11048 SW GREENBL'RG RD #244 TIGARD OR 972; Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN- Tot AV :$53,450 Taxes :$739.95 Phone . D2 RefPar##:1S135CA 90348 131dgSP:856 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164821 Xferd :08/28/96 Price :$42,772 Tot AV :$53,450 Taxes -:$739.95 Phone :503-246-1274 D2 RefPar##:iS135CA 90347 B1dgSF:856 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164411 Xferd :09/13/95 223 Price :$52,500 Tot AV :$51,080 Taxes :$707.14 Phone . D2 Ref Par#:1s135CA 90137 B1dgSF:856 AC: ---------------------------- Parcel :81164625 Xferd :09/27/96 Price :$60,500 Tot AV :$48,290 Taxes :$668.50 Phone . D2 Ref Par#:1S135CA 90242 B1dgSF:856 Ac: . ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164643 Xferd : 3 Price :$49,950 Tot AV :$53,450 :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 244 Taxes :$739.95 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 Sedrm:2 Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Phone MapGrid:655 D2 Ref Par#:1S135CA 90244 Pool: B1dgSF:856 Ac: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. LJ * 41 * ------------------; MetroScan/Washington Owiier:MENESES YVONNE MICHELLE Site :11046 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :11046 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD OR 97223 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, TNT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 333 Censua:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bedrm:2 Sth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar; Pool: * 42 * ------------------; MetroScan/Washington Owner:HAFLIGER CRAIG J & VICKI A Site :11046 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :12609 SW SNOW BRUSH CT TIGARD OR 97223 Use :1512 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, TNT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 336 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bedrm:2 Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 43 * ------------------ : MetroScan/Washington Owner:REMLEY FAYE A Site :11048 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :11048 SW GREENBURG RD #139 TIGARD OR 972 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, TNT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 139 Cenaus:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bedrm:2 Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 44 * ------------------ . MetroScan/Washington Owner:DAL ZHANNA Site :11048 $W GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :11048 SW GREENBURG Rb #243 TIGARD OR 972 Use ;1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, TNT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 243 Cenaus:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Sedrm:2 Bth:1.00 YB;1979 Gar: Pool: * 45 *------------------- ; MetroScan/Washington Owner:BECKP,R RICHARD W Site :11048 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :7954 SW 48TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97219 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN • . ----------------------------- Parcel :R1164769 Xferd :09/10/96 Price :$52,000 Tot AV :$53,450 Taxes :$739.95 Phone D2 RefPar#:1S135CA 90333 B1dgSF:856 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164796 Xferd :08/30/95 Price . Tot AV :$53,450 Taxes :$739.95 Phone . D2 RefPar#:1S135CA 90336 B1dgSF:856 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164439 Xf erd . 3 Price :$32,300 Tot AV :$53,450 Taxers :$739.95 Phone . D2 RefPar#:1S135CA 90139 B1dgSF:856 Ac: :-------------------------- -* Parcel :R1164634 Xferd :11/29/95 3 Price :$54,500 Tor- AV :$53,450 Taxes :$739.95 Phone . D2 RefPar#:1S135CA 90243 B1dgSF:856 Ac: . ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164420 Xferd :05/23/94 Price :$48,500 Tot AV :$51,080 :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 138 Taxes :$707.14 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 Sedrm:2 Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Phone :503-246-4997 MapGrid:655 D2 RefPar##:1S135CA 90138 Pool: B1dgSF:856 Ac: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * 36 *----------------- • MetroScan/Washington Owner:JONES JAN B Site :11044 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :11044 SW GREENBURG RD #116 TIGARD Use :1912 RE.S,CONDOMINIUMS Lega1:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 116 ------------- --------* Parcel :R1164368 Xferd . OR 97223 Price :$19,000 Tot AV :$42,520 Ceneus:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bedrm:l Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 37 * ---------------: MetroScan/Washington Owner:GEORGITSA VLADIMIR A & YEFREMOVA TATYANA Site :11046 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :11046 SW GREENBURG RD #231 TIGARD OR 972 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 231 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bedrm:2 Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool- * 38 * ---------------- MetroScan/Washington Owner:IHLI PERRY Site :11046 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :128 S 38TR ST OMAHA NE 68131 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINILTMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 128 Ccnsus:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bed=:2 Bth:1,00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 39 *------------------: MetroScan/washington Owner:BALDWIN RICK J Site :11046 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :13817 SW BOXELDER ST TIGARD OR 97223 Use :1912 RES, CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 230 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bedrm:2 Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 40 * -----------------MetroScan/Washington Owner:BICKFORD HELEN SUE Site :11046 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :11046 SW GREENBURG RD #335 TIGARD OR 972; Use :1912 US,CON)OMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN Taxes :$588.62 Phone :503-639-3027 D2 RefPar#:iS135CA 90116 Bldgsp:596 Ac: ---------------------------- D * Parcel :R1164590 Xferd :10/31/96 3 Price :$61,000 Tot AV :$53,450 Taxes :$739,95 Phone . D2 RefPar#:1S135CA 90231 EldgSF:856 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164402 Xferd : Price :$49,950 Tot AV :$53,450 Taxes :$739.95 Phone . D2 RefPar#:1S135CA 90128 B1dgSF:856 Ac: ---------- -------------------- Parcel :R1164581 Xferd . Price :$49,000 Tot AV :$53,450 Taxes :$739.95 Phone D2 RefPar#:1S135CA 90230 B1dgSF:856 Ac: ---- --------* Parcel :R1164787 Xferd 3 Price :$49,950 Tot AZT :$53,450 :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 335 Taxes $739.95 Phone Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 D2 RefPar#:1S135CA 90335 Bedrm:2 Bth:1,00 YB:1979 Gar.! Pool: B1dgSF:856 Ac: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But IS Not Guaranteed. • * 31 * ------------------- . MetroScan/Washington Owner:WESTCOTT DAVID R Site :11040 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :5828 SW CHELTENHAM DR PORTLAND OR 97201 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 312 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bedrm:l Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 32 * ------------------ : MetroScan/Washington OwnAr:E & V DEVELOPMENT CO Site :11040 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :13095 SW HENRY ST BEAVERTON OR 97005 Use :1002 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL Legal:ACRES .49 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Gar: Pool: * 33 * ------------------ : MetroScan/Washington Owner:SMITH WINIFRED K Site :11044 SW GREENBUURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :905 SW MAPLECREST DR PORTLAND OR 97219 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCX A, LOT 114 Census:Tract 309.00. Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bedrm:l Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 34 * ------------------ : MetroScan/Washington Owner:HARBECK SALLY JEAN Site :11044 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :11044 SW GREENBURG RD #324 TIGARD OR 972 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 324 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 Bedrm:l Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 35 * -----------------. MetroScan/Washington Owner:MULROONEY TIMOTHY D Site :11044 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Mail :11044 SW GREENBURG RD #322 TIGARD OR 972 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN ---------------------------- * Parcel :R1164714 Xferd Price :$17,500 Tot AV :$42,520 Taxes :$588.62 Phone . D2 RefPar$#:1S135CA 90312 B1dgSF:596 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R0272957 Xferd Price Tot AV :$9,800 Taxes :$135.67 Phone . D2 RefPar## ;1S135CA 02800 131dgSP: Ac:.49 ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164340 Xferd . Price :$20,000 Tot AV :$40,150 Taxes :$555.82 Phone :503-244-4872 02 Ref Par#:1S135CA 90114 B1dgSF:596 Ac: . ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164750 Xf erd 3 Price :$28,500 Tot AV :$42,520 Taxes :$588.62 Phone . D2 Ref Par#:1S135CA 90324 B1dgSF:596 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164732 Xferd :01/29/93 3 Price :$34,000 Tot AV :$42,520 :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 322 Taxes :$588.62 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 Bedrm:l Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Phone MapGrid:655 D2 Ref Par#:1S135CA 90322 Pool: B1dgSF:596 Ac: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. r . + • * 26 * ------------------. Me roScan/Washington - ----- - -----------------* OWner:CRAVER CYNTHIA LYNN Parcel :R1164322 Site :11040 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Xferd :03/16/95 Mail :11040 SW GREENBURG RD #104 TIGARD OR 97223 Price :$30,000 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Tot AV :$42,730 Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 104 Taxes :$591.53 Phone Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 D2 RefPar# :1S135CA 90104 Bedrm:l Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: B1dgSF:596 Ac: * 27 * ------------------ . MetroScan/Washington . ----------- -----------------* Owner:DAVIS EUGENE L Parcel :R1164493 Site :11040 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Xferd , Mail :10875 SW 89TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 Price :$23,650 Use :1912 RE'S,CONDOMINIUMS Tot AV :$42,520 Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, TNT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 205 Taxes :$588.62 Phone :503-246-5862 Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 D2 RefPar# :lS135CA 90205 Bedrm:l 5th:1.00 YS:1979 Gar: Pool: BldgSF:596 Ac: * 28 * ------------------ . MetroScan/Washington . ----------- - ---------------* Owner:RAKHLIN DMITRIY Parcel :R1164885 Site :11040 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Xferd :10/16/95 Mail :11040 SW GREENBURG RD #309 TIGARD OR 97223 Price :$37,500 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Tot AV :$42,520 Lega1:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 309 Taxes :$588.62 Phone Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 D2 RefPar# :1S135CA 90309 Bedrm:l Bth:1.00 Y8:1979 Gar: Pool: B1dgSF:596 Ac: * 29 * ------------------ . MetroScan/Washington . ----------- -----------------* Owner:ELLIOT RICHARD E Parcel :R1164313 Site :11040 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Xferd Mail :11040 SW GREENBURG RD #103 TIGARD OR 97223 Price :$25.893 Use :.1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Tot AV :$40,150 Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, TNT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 103 Takes :$555.82 Phone Census:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 D2 RefPar# :lS135CA 90103 Bedrm:l Bth:1.00 YS:1979 Gar: Pool: B1dgSF:596 Ac: * 30 * ------------------ . MetroScan/Washington . ----------- -----------------* Owner:LENKER RICHARD L & MARGARET P Parcel :81164304 Site :11040 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD 97223 Xferd :11/14/96 Mail :3980 SW 170TH AVE ALOHA OR 97007 Price Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Tot AV :$40,150 Legal:ASF CREEK.PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 102 Taxes :$555.82 Phone Cenaus:Tract 309.00 Block 1 MapGrid:655 D2 RefPar#:1S135CA 90'102 Bedrm:l Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: SldgSF:596 Ac: . The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, nut Is Not Guaranteed * 21 *---------=--------: MetroScan/Washington ------r - ----------------- * Owner:MURAWSKI DANIEL J Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS* Aail :11044 SW GREENBURG RD #323 TIGARD OR 97223 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 323 Census:Tract Block MapGrid: Bedrm:l Bth:1.00 YS:1979 Gar: Pool: * 22 * ------------------ : MetroScan/Washington Owner:KOFFEL STEVEN ALLEN Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS* Mail :2253 NE 164TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97230 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINZUMS Lega1:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 334 Census:Tract Block MapGrid: Bedrm:2 Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 23 * ------------------ : MetroScan/Washington Owner:KOGAN GRIGORY & ALEXANDRA Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS* Mail :4312 SW TERLYN CT PORTLAND OR 97221 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Lega1:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 345 Census:Tract Block MapGrid: Bedrm:2 Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool- * 24 * ------------------ : MetroScan/Washington Owner:FOREIGN MISSION FOUNDATION Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS* Mail :10875 SW 89TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Lega1:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK C, LOT 357 Census:Tract Block MapGrid: Bedrm:l Bth:1.00 )8:1979 Gar: Pool: * 25 * ------------------ : MetroScan/Washington Owner:ASH JOLYNNE & MALCOLM L Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS* Mail :13032 MAPLELEAF CT NE AURORA OR 97002 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Lega1:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK C, LOT 359 Census:Tract Slock MapGrid: Bedrm:l Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: Parcel :R1164741 Xferd :12/08/95 Price :$35,500 Tat AV :$42,520 Taxes :$588.62 Phone . RefPar#:1S135CA 90323 B1dgSF:596 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164778 Xferd Price :$25,000 Tot AV :$53,450 Taxes :$739.95 Phone . RefPar#:lS135CA 90334 B1dgSF:856 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164803 Xferd :09/12/95 Price :$52,000 Tot AV :$53,450 Taxes :$739.95 Phone :503-246-1274 RefPar#:1S135CA 90345 B1dgSF:856 Ac: --- -----------------------* Parcel :R1164849 Xferd :10/20/94 Price :$104 Tot AV :$42,520 Taxes :$588.62 Phone . RefPar#:lS135CA 90357 B1dgSF:596 Ac: . ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164867 Xferd :06/13/94 Price :$41,500 Tot AV :$42,520 Taxes :$588.62 Phone :503-678-2020 RefPar# :1S13 5CA. 90359 B1dgSF:596 Ac: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * 16 * ------------------ . MetroScan/Washington .----------------------------* Owner:CRISWELL CHARLES D & PHYLLIS L Parcel :R1164670 Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS* Xferd :12/02/94 Mail :PO BOX 642 ESTACADA OR 97023 Price . Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Tot AV :$42,520 Lega1:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK C, LOT 255 Census:Tract Block MapGrid: Bedrm:1 Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 17 * ------------------ : MetroScan/Washington Owner:FOREIGN MISSION FOUNDATION Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS* Mail :10873 Sw 89TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK C, LOT 256 Census:Tract Block MapGrid: Bedrm:2 Sth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 18 * ------------------- : MetroScan/Washington Owner:GESME PAMELA RUTH Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS* Mail :4021 NE 22ND AVE PORTLAND OR 97212 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, INT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 310 Census:Tract Block MapGrid: Bedrm:1 Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 19 * ------------------ . MetroScan/Washington Owner:WILLIAMS DOROTHY ANN Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS* Mail :13336 SW CHELSEA LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 Use :1912 RES,CONT?OMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK. CONDOMINIUM, INT M :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 311 Census:Tract Block MapGrid: Bedrm:l Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: . Pool.- * 20'* -------------------- MetroSca n/Washington Owner:WAHL KIMBERLY ANN Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS* Mail :7054 SW LOCUST ST TIGARD OR 97223 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Lega1:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, TNT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 321 Census:Tract Block MapGrid: Bedrm:l Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: Taxes :$588.62 Phone . RefPar#:15135CA 90255 -B1dgSF:596 Ac: . ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164689 Xf erd : Price : Tot AV :$53,450 Taxes :$739.95 Phone . RefPar#:1S135CA 90256 B1dgSF:856 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164696 Xferd : Price :$39,950 Tot AV :$42,520 Taxes :$588.62 Phone RefPar#:1S135CA 90310 B1dgSF:596 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164705 Xferd :08/06/91 Price . Tot AV :$42,520 Taxes :$588.62 Phone :503-620-6775 RefPar#:1S135CA 90311 B1dgSF:596 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164723 Xferd :04/06/89 Price :$23,700 Tot AV :$42,520 Taxes :$588.62 Phone . RefPar#:1S135CA 90321 B1dgSF:596 Ac: The Information Provided is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * 11 *------------------: MetroScan/Washington Owner:WESTCOTT DAVID R Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS* Mail :5828 SW CHELTENHAM DR PORTLAND OR 97201 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, TNT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 218 Census:Tract Block MapGrid: Bedrm:l Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool.: * 12 * ------------------ . MetroScan/Washington Owner:STEELE JAMES D Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS* Mail :1745 SW FILMONT AVE PORTLAND OR 97225 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Lega1:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, TNT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 219 Census:Tract Block MapGrid: Bedrm:l Sth:1.00 YS:1979 Gar: Pool: * 13 * ------------------ : MetroScan/Washington Owner:PETROSIAN ROBERT Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS* • . ---------------------------- * Parcel :R1164545 Xferd : Price :$14,500 Tot AV :$42,520 Taxes :$588.62 Phone . Ref Par#:1S135CA 90218 B1dgSF:596 Ac: . ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164554 Xferd :03/01/95 Price :$27,500 Tot AV :$42,520 Taxes :$588.62 Phone :503-646-6721 Ref Par#:1S135CA 90219 B1dgSF:596 Ac: . ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164563 Xferd :06/27/95 Mail :11044 SW GREENBURG RD #220 TIGARD OR 97223 Price :$42,500 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Legal:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, TNT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK A, LOT 220 Census:Tract Block MapGrid: Bedrm:l Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: * 14 * ------------------ : MetroScan/Washington Owner:GOVSTEIN GENNADY & KIRA Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS* Mail :14735 SW DAPHNE CT BEAVERTON OR 97007 Use :1912 RES,CONDOMINIUMS Lega1:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, TNT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 229 Census:Tract Block MapGrid: Bedrm:2 Bth:1.00 Y8:1979 Gar: Pool: * 15 * ------------------ : MetroScan/Washington Owner:GRANGE GARY B & KAREN K Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS* Mail :11579 SE FALLBROOK DR CLACKAMAS OR 97015 Use :1912 RES,CONDCMINIUMS Lega1:ASH CREEK PARK CONDOMINIUM, TNT IN :COMMON ELEMENT, BLOCK B, LOT 241 Census:Tract Block MapGrid : Sedrm:2 Bth:1.00 YB:1979 Gar: Pool: Tot AV :$42,520 Taxes :$588.62 Phone :503-968-8053 Ref Par#:1S135CA 90220 B1dgSF:596 Ac: . ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164572 Xferd :02/22/95 Price :$42,000 Tot AV :$53,450 Taxes :$739.95 Phone . Ref Par#:1S135CA 90229 B1dgSF:856 Ac: ---------------------------- Parcel :R1164616 Xferd :02/14/94 Price :$37,196 Tot AV :$53,720 Taxes :$743.68 Phone :503-698-6687 Ref Par#:1S135CA 902=1 B1dgSF:856 Ac: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is.Not Guaranteed. •1 r r • INTERFAITH OUTREACH SERVICES RITE CENTER PROJECT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MARCH 26, 1997 7 Neighbors present 1 IOS Board Member 2 IOS staff Architect for the project (see attached sign-in sheet) The meeting was opened at 7:00Pm by Kim Brown, IOS Executive Director who described the conditional use permit process, the purpose of the neighborhood meeting and the agenda for the meeting. Kim Brown did a brief history of IOS and the services provided by the agency, bringing people up to the present with the shelter re-location. Ms. Brown then talked about the programs at IOS, the pre-screening and intake process for admittance into the shelter and answered questions regarding the day to day operation of the shelter including hours of operation, staff to client ratio, and shelter rules and regulations. Sid Scott, project architect, presented visual aids to show the lot size, the proposed building size and placement on the lot, parking requirements, use of the existing two story house as shelter operations office space, and demolition and removal of the smaller one story house. In addition, Mr. Scott talked about the Phasing of the project dependent upon available funding. The following concerns were expressed by neighbors: * Noise level * Effect on surrounding property values * Potential for problems with people using the parking lot of the condominiums for parking vehicles * Appearance of the facility and landscape upkeep * Signage * People attending the meeting would like to contact additional neighbors outside the required 250 feet to give project information and possibly hold an additional meeting. Conclusions: IOS will use residential grade materials for siding, roofing and windows and neighbor friendly fencing within the State Offices to Families with Children code for the playground area. Program participants staying at the shelter will be responsible.for landscape upkeep as a part of their contract with IOS. ._. _C.. . s???_?_' _ Its ?vuS r ?? 24? -- ?_hh?(e d_Kir. mJrct 1-- %osll SW (oc',? T.9 02 97aa3 57?_ a 0? z?y??jEti ---- ----------..??czL? Nh_?1,0 ?3?5 ???? ?n,?e??e? COQ aZ?35 ?50? ------------------- - - ---------.- --'- - --- ---- ,.i 7-1 I i I r g ' ~3 ~l - - ~~~~f ~ '~0~ ~ EXf STINCx CURB CUT, E II $ EN~`RY GAZEBO ~ ~ REDUCED Ta ALLoW 23 -1a 9 BIKE RACK ~ DRIVEWAY 1~ PLAYGROUND 2 2 ENTRANCE DRfYEWAY 11 NE~U SHELTER FACILITY 3 3 PARKING 12 PATID 4 4 LICxI~T POLE 14' ~fC~4~ 13 PHASE 2 FU~'URE EXPANSION 5 5 TRASH ENCL05URE 14 WALKWAY SfGN ~ DETENTION POND. 15 MONUMENT SIGN ~ EXfSTING NOI~S~_ _ _ _ 16 FENCE f~M~v~n rr ~~V~lSta~ rt~ r} ~ ~ w., ~P r ~ r' ~i ~I;~~t~~~~~~~f~~ ~cZS, r ul ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ r ~ P ~ ~ , ~ I I 1 I f I ~ c~ • 4 ~ f 1 ~ ` ~ I 1 1 } r 1 I ~ I ~ ~r _ o. ~ 1 a ~ PROf'~RTY LINE W ~ 1 ~ V ~ , I P Iw a 1 f~ ~ ~ i'' 1 2~ ~ "a r i i r r ¦rr ~ _ rr 1 . ~J ~r . ~ , . -t ~ ~ 3 ~ E ~ ~ ' I Y 1 ~ M r~i l 7)' ~ f ~ i I f ~ ~ 1P '1' ~ ~ ~ r 4~ ~C O ' ~ I r w. e _M1 - _ ._..~_..m...._m..._.~...~ ~ , A ~l ...._T ' f M I . . ~ v • • . ~ o ~ , ~ . E ~ I~ ~ - i t ~ 1 ~ -.........-....~.............+......_..~__v t ~ ~ : . - i . , ' `l ~ ~ ' I r~ ' . ~ 4 a7 V ~ ~ ~ ~ 1. u ~ ~ ~ i ~ 4 ~ U ~ ~ L ~ ,'p M E _i ~ ~ g o ' .r ~ r d ~ , d • , 'r 0 Z ' ~ 1~ ~I y' t N b ~i 4 W d ~ Slt~ pL~4N p ~ u ~ M 3~ ~ 0 8' 16' 32 ~ N~tN f ~ti z m i F H in 4a O -a 0 a ~LL Z 0 O ~ 8 ~~~~N1~ ~ - ~ _ _ T ~ ~ A ~ NSW PaRICiNG AREA 2 2 NUJ ADMINf~tR,4`~I4N 1`1pDUL,4r2 OF~iG~ ~3l~ILDINCx ~ 3 3 SN~LT~R ~I~CILITY 1U/ NSW 2,63m ~.F ADDIT{ON . , - _ - ( ti ~ ~ ~ -"ter r id~1 ~ ! - P r wry ~ ~ ~"I . ~ ~'~b - e ~ ~ i ~ ~ r r '4 P~OP~Rt1~ L INS W ~ ~ ~ N . ..Q V r0 i t'~ i I ~ ~ $r ~ r~ ° rt wr ~ W ~ ~ ~Q t }S + ~ '~i . C.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , I ~ V s, ~ ~ i ~r t ;r""~ ~ W ~ t ~ . ~ ~ o ~ t ~b ' N .tea ~w ' • a jr ~ . 1' I I . ~ Q f ~ ate/ --w-----m K , ~ ~ t -mar -r-.nr~~~rna.....~..~....o.~+Y'~u.--T-~~~e-.rn.......u+n~.r_,.-«~r...~_~_--W. ` . ~--~.-.--ter.-.- ..v.-._.~~~.-~.. -rr -.~..m....r.~~.--....... w,---- - i - i~ E ~ _ - :.~-..r.~ r T T TM_._. . 1 ~ 7 ~ ~ i, r . ~ + ~ i ~ - ~ r ' ~ o I~ r 1 ~ { F V ~ . ~I L ~ ~ : ' ~y ~ 4_ ~ ~ ~ ~ F p _i ~ ' " a a d N • 0 z L~~r, . h r m (n N ~ r-I Q d W a E 5it~ Pl~~N ~ E I ~ \ MJ'1J ~ I 0 0 8' 16' 32 ~ ~Q~tN u I z J " pp LJ F- H , (x N -a ~ ~ LJ Q w Z 0 ~ Z y ~ D ~ - ~ - ~ ~i~~-!o`~ LEG~I~ID ~ ~~MINf~~i~~~"ION 1 or-rice i LEGEND ~ I FRONT PORCH 14 NEALTN ROOM ~ 2 REGEP710N AREA 2 2 ENTRY 15 LAUNDRY 3 1 1 O O O - 4 RES71200MO~ 3 REGEP110N 16 GzUEST ROOM O O 5 WOi~G ROOM `i' 4 MANACsER'S OFFICE 11 MEN SNOIUER/TOfLET ROOM G ~iBGH~`a~GA~L~ G~fORkZa~ 5 5 CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER IS UJOMEN 9HOWER/701LET ROOM 6 CHILD DEVELOPMENT OFFICE 19 PATIO '1 RES7ROOM 20 PLAYGROUND 8 UvINCa/pININ6 ROOM 21 "COAT GL05E7" 9 KITCHEN 22 SORTING I I I 10 COOLER/FREEZER 23 PUBLIC RESTROOM II PANTRY 24 MANACsER APARTMENT 12 STORACsE/i"IEGNANICAL 25 RES?ROOM O O O O O~ ~ t'~P 13 HALL AMP PROPEh2TY LINE N ~I.~R 1°I..aN • R~M~N. ~FIG~ _ .V I - --I. - ~ ~ _ ~ V ~ ~ z~ ~ ~ l ~ - --T - _ - -a ~ ~L:JI I~ - - - - - _ - - - - - ~ w W I~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ o o W ~ ~ - I O bt o ~ _ ~V CO - - - - , I~ ~ t-- ~ ~ io ~ - ~3 ~ Q i .fi ~.a ; ~ti 0 I~ _ II g~ i ~ , ~ti ,o_ 0 w o J a U N Q J I L a l - ~ ' ~ ~l i _ o 2 N - - - - t f N m m ~•f Sr/ a w F ~ ~1 FLOOR PLAN '~l~O''O h~` O Q' 3 ~ ~ - Y ~ NORTH Z Q ~ u 0 5' 10` 20' W F- v L ~ 0 0 I. LLJ Z ~i ZU- HfA15E 2 f r _ - - - ~0~ D D ? o 0 a d D 0 0 w ...w ~I rl ~ w ARC)-IiTEGTS• ARCHITECTS VAN LOM/EDIUARDS A.I.A.,PG ADDRE55 Sly C~REENBGRG ROAD ~ 34 N.W FIRST AYENUE, SUITE 309 Al COVER S~;~ET TIC~ARD, OREC~ PORTLAND, OREGON 9-!209 TEL (503) 226-0590 A2 ~X15TiNC~ Slrt~ SURV~1' INTERFAITH OUTREACH SERvIGES FAx. (503) 2-13-8b49 OL~11=R. A3 51T~ PLAN PO BOX 230821 ATTN. 54D SCOTT A4 C~RApi~1C~ ~ I~TiLITirS TIGARD, OREGON 91281 TEL (503J 598-0359 CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE MGKEEvERlMORRIS, ING A5 LAND~GAP~ PLAN - 1 N Av SUITE 400 ~ FAX 1503) 620 93 8 122 5W SEGO D E, d~ PNAS~ 1 FLODR PLAN AT"'N KIMBERLY D 43ROU1N PORTLAND, OREGON 91204 ~ A~1 PI~A6~ 2 FLOOR PLAN ~•i• TEL (503) 228-1352 A8 BI~~L~INCs EL~`~ATIDNS w FAX. (503) 228-1365 ATTN. JIM RAPP STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS• WALIKERlDILORETO/YOUNIE, ING WILLAMETTE PARK PLAZA 6420 SW MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 360 PORTLAND, OREGON 91201 w C~ z T~CL (503)168.3930 U ~ FAX (503)168-3929 ATTN DALE DfLORETO ~ ~ oC MEGr-IANICAL ~ ELECTRICAL INTERFAG{r £NGINE£RiNG, ING ENCsINEERS 6542 SE LAKI= ROAD MILWAUKIE, OREGON 9'1222 ~ o TEL 1503)659.6394 ~ . rAX (503) 659-9029 OE D ATTN. ~ W~ Fw" GIYIL ENGINEERS WALKERlDILGRI:TOlYOUNEE, iNC. WILLAMETTE p{~f~C F'LAZA Z 6420 SW. MACADAM AVEN , 6UiTE 360 PORTLAND, OREGON~r9~~0 T (503) 168- 93f0 EL FAX. (503"~ -3g2g ATr PALE DILORETO " a ~f.~ CITY OF TIGARD BUiLDIN~x DEPARTMiNT DESCRIPTION OF UJORK. CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW BUILDiNCa BUILDING nEPARTMENT '3'25 5W HALL BLVD TiCxARD, ORECsON 91223 TEL 1503) 639-4111 f ING GODS UBG, 1994 EDITION W/ 1996 OREGON STRUCTURAL 6P£GIALTY GODS BU LD 1 ITIDN 0 ATTN pLUMBiNG CODE UPC, 994 ED ELECTRVC GODS N.E G,, 1994 EDITION PLANNINCs DEF'ART~'IENT CITY OF TIGARD PLANNINCs DEPARTMENT MEG~4ANIGAL GODS UMC, 1994 EDITION 13125 &W HALL BLVD +~ANDICAP CODE A.DA. GUIDELINES ! ORl;GON AMENDMENTS 71CsARD, ORI=CON 91223 TEL (503) 639-4111 ZONING CLASSIFICATION R-12 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ATTN m OCCUPANCY I I~EALTN DEPARTMENT WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON GONSTh'UGTION TYPE V-N 1"' DEPARTMENT OF HEATH d NuMAN 6tRvIGES SEISMIC zoNE• 3 ~ V . FROST LINE i8° Q a 155 N FIR87 A E NILLS80R0, ORECsON ROOF LOAD. 25 PSF/LL, --P~/DL TEL 1503) 648-8122 ~ ATTN. TORY HARR~S SITE AREA. 12 ACRE 131,363 SF) 0 ~ ~ BUILDING GOYERAGIr PHASE E 15.93Q (5,000 SFJ a FIRE DEPARTMENT TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE R£~GUE P~+ABE 2 2439'0 (1,630 6F) z 20665 S£ BLAN70N i iMpERYl0U5 SUI~ACES 21 qd ~ ALOHA, OR7=CxON a~ r LANDSCAPING P+~ABE I 5693'0 ~ TEL (503) 649-8511 (11,855 5F) ~ ATTN PHASE 2 48.59'° (15,225 SF) H PU$L~G IUORCB DEPARTMENT. CITY OF TiCsARD ENCxfNEER1NG DEPARTMENT - ALLOWABLE PUILDiNG HEIGHT 35 FEET ~ (STREETS/SEWER) ~GARD, OREGON 91233 ACTUAL SUILDiNCx WEIGHT 24 FEET ~ 'EL (503) ~ ATTN ~ r~^ ~ RTM T CITY OF TICsARD PARKING PROVIDED 9 STANDARD SPACES ~ lUA ~ ~R D_PA~ ~ 3125 5W HALE. BLVD I HANDICAP SPACE a "'iGARD, OREGON 9223 w -4111 10 TOTAL pARC1NG SPAG£6 ~ TEL (503) 639 Q ~ ATTN b I A GOMpAN`' NORT4~WEST NAT~+RAL GA5 COMPANY G 6 3 I 220 N W. 2nd nne~~i tir,in noC/./11J A~~~AQ T-VICILMIVVI VI~Lbrvi~ r rvr v~ ~ "EL (503) ~2'I-2455 ATTN ERNE SU,4R-rZ ELECTRIC COMPANY PORTLAND CzENERAL ELECTRIC 2 A 5 UJ 6ALMON w, I W*C - 0806 0-7 PORTLAND, OREGON 91204 ro 'EL (503) 464-8581 ^ ATTN MARLENE STEVEN$ l Z w 11? E z µ I i I i ~ ~ a ' I E. 24" CONC CUT NE. = 153 73' E ¦ f~ SITUATED IN THE N.E. 1 4 S. ~ -O W. 1 4 ~ ~ SECTION 3~ T. 1 S, R. 1 W W.M. I r. Cf TY OF TI CAR D ~a . r WASH ~ N GTON COUNTY, OREGON i is SURVEYED. MARCH 11, 1997 r ; LEGEND 4 -SAN - - SANITARY SEWER LINE ~ 87°41'01" W WAT - WATER LINE AR - oHU~--~ - ovERHEAD POWER LINES ~ ~ V WOOD - - STORM SEWER Li NE ~ V I FRAME ~ S SANITARY SEWER (VOTES x - FENCEL NE ~ I i • RES. ~ r II ~ ~~v ~ RIM ELEV = 166 25' ~ - WATER VALVE i E 12" CONC INS = 15719' 16" D ~ ~ SLAY I E 12" CONC aUT N = 15715' ~ - CATCH BASIN ~ II A x 6~, . O - SANITARY MANHaLE Z 11 ° ~ ~ APIDAT O RIM ELEV = 160 66' (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) W Z ~ 39~~ ~ ASKETBALL HOOP FENCE IE 12"CONCINS.=15331' ~ I E 12" CONC OUT N = 15316' ~ ~ _ ° - DECIDl,0U5 TREE W W ~ ~ ~ H = N 07°23' W ~ ~9 . ~ - CONIFEROUS TREE 3 ~ ~f~vfar~ To g~ I~ ~f7 S 24°57'20" E ~5~., ~ ~ r.~ STORM DRAINAGE NOTES Q,~ ~ 11 ~ sIGN ~ w ~ ~ (14.40'}(1) 11 AY 1 RIM ELEV = 171 94' - UTILITY POLE ~ ~ ~ I.E 18" CONC IN SE = 168 27' ~ GUY ANCHOR 11 75°16'53" E I E. 18" CONC OUT N. = 168.14' - MAIL BOX 11 .26' ~ ~ ~ cRass RIM ELEV = 164 31' ~ - WATER METER I E 18" CONC INS = 158 86' ~ TRAFFIC SIGNAL ~ r~5~ ~ 2~ I E 12" CaNC IN E = 158,96' 11 3~~~~ °5'~ I E 24" CONC our N. = 158.72' ~ BOLLARD - N1~~3, G~~ T~,93 m - CABLE TV RISER coNriNUES ~ ~ ~ 32.1 pP Q 4 RIM ELEV = 161,04' ~ TRAFFIC SiGNA~ BOX p N'LY FRC~,~ '-1ERE p I E 24" CONC INS = 156 94' ® - TELEPHa`VE R15ER NCT F,ELC LCCAT~ D , 11 I E 12" CONC IN NW = 157 03' I E 24" CONO OUT N = 156 89' D I - DUCTILE IRON PIPE p , 3~ ~1 17°24'04" ~N J 1 , ~ 17.23' Q GRATE ELEV ~ 174 36' I E 18" CONC INS = 17Q 61' 2 ~ ~ I E 12" CONC IN W = 171 61' n v a E 18" CONC OUT N, = 170 56' Z l ' ~e 1 a d 7 GRATE ELEV = 171 91' ~ n m I E 1 a" coNC IN s = 169,a1' 4.E. 18" coNC our NW. = 168 81' `11 ~ a ~ GRATE ELEV = 163 68' v q ' I E. 12" CONC OUT NW. = 161 23' a GRATE ELEV = 158 68' ~l N 1 I E 24" CONC IN SW = 15318' I E 24" CONC OUT NE = 153.08' 0 SURVEY PREPARED BY GTE MANHOL ~0. a . SCALE: G & L LAND SURVEYING, ANC 8116 S W NIMBUS AVE BEAVERTON, OREGON 97008 ti 4= 1 =20' 6 PHONE- 641-008 i I JOB #1728 0 C X 9 i _ ~ w 1 EXf STING CURB GUT, 8 ENTRY GAZEBO REDUCED TO ALLOW 23'-iP" 9 81KE RACK ~ DRIVEWAY 10 PLAYCsRDUNU 2 2 ENTRANCE DRIVEWAY I1 NE~U S+~ELTER 1=AGILITY 3 3 PARKING 12 PATIO 4 4 L1CxNT POLE 14' I~IGN I~ PNASE 2 1=UTURE EXPANSION 5 5 TRA5~1 ENCLOSURE 14 WALKWAY 51GN ~ DETENTION POND i5 MONUMENT 51GN ~1 ~ EXISTINCs HOUSE lU/ 16 FENCE ADMINISTRATIVE OF>=1CES ~ ~ r~ P~/' , ~ , 1 • ~ , E ~ ~ , 1 ~ ...r 1 f l~ ,i ~ ~r ~ 1 - 1 a ti~ • o q , w PROp~RtY L INS ~ 1 ,r ~f R~ I~ ~ ~s' W ~ + r b ~ ~ ~ ~ 1r 1 • • ~ ~ I ~ ~ r . ~ o~ ~V • ' ~ ~ • I • r , • ~ ; ~....y .r _ _ u~ w ~ 1/// i . , f 1 1 r . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~j~ 1 rf f • r ~ / 91,/ ~ ~ K ~ ~ ~ ~ : / r ~r 4 t' ~ ~ Q rt ~ ~ ~ ~ • Q ~ i ~ ~ . r T ~ 4- ~ I ~ _ ~ q , o__...... . • . • ~ 1 _ ~ ~ ~ 1 i ~ , ID ~ . I~ _ ~ ~ • ~ T~ • . ~ ~ _4 4 1 1 ~1~ ' , ~ - I w 0 ' ~ y f ^ i4 • ~ IA ~ + /1 n ~ ~ , 1 ~1 , ~ C ~I L' a I' ~ _I ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ Z 'r d d ~ ~W ~i ~r ~ ti t ~I F a ~It~ ~'L~N d i 4 37~ NoRtN 3 Y Z Q J m LL7 Q H v ~ r ~ Q N /a 0 fm 4A&E ~ a Q~ z U. 0 0 7 i A / i ~ ' II ~xi~ Z~~~ n.~. wn~~ ~xiyr. y4•• 5T d ~ ~~(l~T. IL" V I. war~a- 1 ~~~r. iz" n. t. w~-r~R. / ' ~ T I ' our~Er cowraoe. ORIFI(.g S'{RV4NRE I _ _ Xis7. G/~ SERYICS -TO kLE1M~tJ ' ST DRAIN ~ 1 WR7ER QWLITY { I4°2.R ~~ti"L ~tlSE EXIS7 S S. ~ ~ PoNO ~ ~ ~ . , f +~x?st sue. s~we~. r ~ AND CrAS S~RVIcB I ~ • ww f.~EW 5T. b CONMEcTIp~l ~ ~ R y ( TO @.CMAIt~. 1 ~ J ~ ` NeW FHbN W~te¢~ ~ I - NeW ss, CouN~c.tloa ,l ~ ` cohtrco~ MnNt+oi.z V J I~ ~ I I P I ~ ` PROP~R~"Y L ~N~ LaL.I ~ W ~ ~ ~0 ~ ~ N 6~ _ NS W sT O_ New a.y. 1 Sq . e Q r-- - - - - ~XIyT c I ~ _ _ v ~ W ' I ; NEW STD _ ~ fi - i--~ ~ a I ~ ~ 1 j-- - -V• ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ t~tiVJ WAi~z METeR 1 L II ~Nn CoxN~nor~ ~ ~ a~ Q rt ~ ! ~ E ~ r 1 I~ I I I EXlht. GA~i °~ERVtt.4 L~ ~ - - i - I I xisr. Y~~e. Rtsuc. N 4~ 0 ~ ? ~ a I I I i~ i. w ~ a ~xisr. ~A~ ~ I I a I I I i~ v z° w as I ~ r N m I EXIST S,S ~ EXi~,t, 12" b.l, WAT$R ~ 'i'UAL ht~l VALd£Y WATE6. FIST. CONC~p1'U~4L Utl~.ltf~~ pL,4N y Exiy7, ~8" sT. b. m 16' 32 ~ NORtN Q~ I y I w rm ~10 ~4.0 dl ~a ISI a wm 0 Z +VL z L 0 4-A > 0 f _y_ 1 ~0~ ~a ~.~N~SC~fi~~ ~.~C~~N~ SYMBOL COMMON NAME SIZE/COND. SPADING TREE~v SOTANf CAL NAME KT KATSURA TREE 2" CAL, A5 SNOUJN CERCfDIPNYLLUM JAPONICUM 1 RSP REDSPIRE PEAR 2" GAL. 25' O.C. PYRUS CALLERYANA s,; SEEDED/SOD LAURA •~w ~r . '4. d ' „ ~ .r ~ ~ C~RA55 BERM • ~ ` + ~ ~ ti ^ ~ I I J , ~ / 4 _ L I1 7~J rJ i ~ y t/'~ ' 4 ' ~ t i ~ 1 1 r r ,,iii ' f 1r I~ r ~ a 1 S, 1~ r . ~ i i ~ h` ' x °'e 1 '1 b , ~ ~ r y , ~I w • • ' • ~NCiE 1~ d ~ ~ ~o ~ o ~r ~ ' w r '4 ~ ~ ~ 'z b~ 7 •r ~ .a W Z v~ . . ; . • • C.~ ~ ~ 6, Y~ F ~~hy i r i ~ 1 ~ Yr ' ~r I~~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ r • ~ 1' C3 v ~..__.__1. . • o~ W ~ 1 i 4 ~ S ~ ~ I~°r a ' S, i i ` ~ r ~ ~ , , ~ ~ ' , r o ~ ~ 1 ~R i~ (h I ~a 1 ~ cv Q ~ , rt , ~ ~ U ~Ud~? G~ ~ k; ~ ~ ~ j. ~ 1 ~i ~ ~ k ~ ' r •~r. . 4 ~ ~ t ~ ~ F 1 ~ s L, , ~ s m ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • w ~ ~ ~ ~ ' d , , , ; U ~ iM F ' ~ . _I ~ ~ ~ ~ . Sk a 2 ~ ~ , 6 d I` d i ~ ',t ~ 0 ~J Z ~J F- r ^1 ~.~4N1~5C~4p~ ~'l.~4N 4 Q @ 8' !6' 32' NORM r" Q Q U \ i ~ I Y 7 Q i a ~a r!1 ~ r ~a 61 cv 4 ~ ~LL Z „ 0 ~ ~ LEC~ I F 2 E 3 R 4 M 5 GI 6 CI '1 R $ LI 9 IGI LEC~~ND I FRONT PORCH 12 STORA~sE/MECHANICAL 2 ENTRY 13 HALL ~ 3 REGEPTIDN 14 NEAL7N ROOM 4 MANACzER'S OFFICE 15 LAUNpRY 5 GHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER 16 CzUE9T ROOM 6 CNILp DEVELOPMENT OFFICE ll MEN SNOWER/TOILET ROOM 7 RESTROOM 18 U10MEN SHOWER/TOILET ROOM $ LIVINCs/DINING ROOM 19 PATIO 9 IGITGNEN 2~ PLAYGROUND I(d C II P Ifd COOLER/PREEZER 21 PHASE 2 FUTURE EXPANSION II PANTRY PROPERTY LINE - t/1 ~ ~ ~ ~V - - - - T ~ ~ - - - - ---E I I ~ V ~C ' ~ ; Z ~ t ~ iv ~ ~ i~v I/~ ~ ~ - L_t W Oo ~ i- p ~ i ~---fi ~r O ~ _ ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0~ «v I ~ ~ W c~C ~ Q - O i I _a ~ r' f I I i~ - - l ~ ~ ~ i o, a ~ - 1 - a iR I- - - - - - 0 Z ~o~i , ~u Y a 1 ~L ~ ~LDOR PLAN 50~ h~ 0 J ~ 0 m 5~ ~o~ ~0~ NoRt~ 3 ~ a ~ Y I Z K~ Q Mu v v ~Q V / i~ ~,J h l'~' V W O ~l r- l 4 6 V `I 5E I N Z.. d 1+ l of 0 0 - - - - - - ~ 3 L~Cx~ND ~ ~ ~ FRONT PORCH 14 HEALTH ROOM ~ ~ 2 ENTRY 15 LAUNDRY 3 REGEP710N 16 CsUEST RDOM 4 4 MANAGER'S OFFICE Il MEN SI-IOUJER/TOILET ROOM 5 5 GHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER IS UIOMEN SHOWER/TOILET ROOM 6 ro C4-IILD DEVELOPMENT OFFICE 19 PATIO yd. 7 7 RES7ROOM 20 PLAYCsROUND 8 8 LIVINfi/DININCs ROOM 21 "COAL CLOSET" 9 9 KITCHEN 22 SOF2TING 10 10 COOLER/FREEZER 23 PUBLIC RESTROOM I I II PANTRY 24 MANAG=ER APARTMENT is 12 STORACsE/MECHANICAL 25 RES7ROOM 13 13 HALL PROPER?Y LINE t/~ g •V - - ~ ~ 4~ t/~ 1 ~ ~ , . I pG ~ ~ V I _ _ _ _a Q LO, - - - - - 13- - ~ ' Z ~ -t pv I ~ ~ w - ~ ~ o i~ ~ ~~A I ~ Rs p' oc >o 0 .o _ ~ E-- . 23 ~Y2 ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - _ _ _-I- 2~ ~~x - - - - - I I O i~ _ ~ L ~ 0 r ~ ' - \ ~ 8 Q i ~ ti 2 Q ti _ _ - - - -a- f - _ a - i~ r m m N r ~q,~ I ~N A_ _ _ 3 Y ~1 FLOOR PLAN 6 i NORTW 20, n4A ~a a zLL z ~ 0 0 ~ SE 2 Q - - - ~ I~ E i~. i i ~I ~ i I ~ ~ ~ i II ~ r_ ~ r i i U I ~ ~ ~ °1 0 _ • - ~ ~/o •.3 u,S ,.gt ~ ya ~w 4 _ 115 ~ 9~~~ ~f ~ EI ~ ~ p'd ~ - - ~ ~ ~ 8 V a V~ ~L~VAtION V 1 4~ oG N 1 W L~C~s~ND Z ~ I ENTftY CsAZEBO W Z 2 PLAYCsROUND FENCE V O Q 3 FRONT PORCH W I 4 PHASE 2 FUTURE EXPANSION L~ ~ j 5 COMPOSITION SHINCsLES 1.~ 6 BOARD e BATTEN SIDINCs 1 LAP 51DINCs ~ O S VINYL IUiNDOlUS L~ ~ r" ' ` ,Y is ~ ~7 rrA ~~+'f 9 UJALL LfCsHTS L-•• i I .!P F ~~N o f r f 1 C If r Im WOOD/CsLASB DOOR ~1"" ~ !A~ ~ y ~ L II ME?AL DOOR A&~ ff 8 ~ I ~ ' 12 ATTIC VENT ~ ~ F-- ~ 13 PLAYCsROUND J I ; 1 s Y O w 0 ...r U N W F- - -r- Q F. ~ ~ 1 o rJ ! I I Z U I ~ y _ ~ ~ J' ' , f J 1~ rv ~ J^7 C7 1 1 rnnti ~"f ~~w L~ Q _J 1~ d~ 3 I ~ l' Y Q ~ u W f LJ ~ N ri w li ..r -a (P ro d ~ Z a z~ i