The URL can be used to link to this page

Hearings Officer Packet - 05/14/2004h1h % N HEARINGS OFFICER MONDAY - MAY 10, 2004 - 7:00 PM Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Hearings Officer meetings by noon on the Friday prior to the meeting. Please call 503-639-4171, Ext. 2438 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (rDD - Telecommunications Devices fior the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments and qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. To request such services, please notify the City of Tigard of your need(s) by 5:00 p.m., no less than one (1) week prior to the meeting date at the same phone numbers listed above so that we can make the appropriate arrangements. Hearings are held in Town Hall at the City of Tigard at 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Staff reports are available to the public 7 days prior to the hearing date 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC HEARING 2.1 ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE FACILITY FOR ST. VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2004-00002 DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2004-00014 DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2004-00015 DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2004-00016 DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2004-00017 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval to construct a 1,000 square foot, single- story storage building on a half-acre lot that is currently being used for parking. The applicant is also seeking approval of four (4) Adjustments to reduce the rear yard setback from 15 to 12 feet, to reduce the minimum landscaping requirement from 20% to 15%, to reduce the buffer width between the proposed use and adjacent uses, and to adjust the right-of-way requirements on SW McKenzie Street. LOCATION: 12630 SW Grant Avenue; WCTM 2S102BD, Tax Lot 800. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18,765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. 3. OTHER BUSINESS 4. ADJOURNMENT SUBJECT TO CHANGE Page 1 of 1 0 0 XGesv)o rem No. 2.1 6 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503)684-0360 Notice 1'T 10390 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 APR UWLUO Legal Notice Advertising o o M •City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice 1-3125 SW Hall Blvd. • • Tigard,Oregon 97223 ❑ Duplicate Affidavit Accounts Payable AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) 1 Kathv Snvder being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of thPTiaard-Tualatin Times a newspaper of general circulatign as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published of Tigard . the aforesaid county and state; that the Public Hearing CUP2004-00002.St.Vincent DePaul Storaae a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and consecutive in the following issues: April 22,2004 Subscribed and sworn to befo a this n rq day of A r i 1, 2 0 0 4 OFFICIAL SEAL tttTTT~~~ ROBIN A BURGESS NO PUbIiC for Oregon NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON J~ COMMISSION NO. 34459C My Commission Expires: OMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 16,'_ AFFIDAVIT 0 0 The following will be considered by the Tigard Hearings Officer on Monday May 10, 2004 at 7:00 PM at the Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. Both public oral and written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the Tigard Municipal Code and the rules of procedure adopted by the Council and available at City Hall or the rules of procedure set forth in Chapter 18.390. Testimony may be submitted in writing prior to or at the public hearing or verbally at the public hearing only, Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior to the close of the hearing accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to afford the decision-maker an opportunity to respond to the issue precludes appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeal based on that issue. Failure to specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven (7) days prior to the hearing, and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Divisioi; (staff contact: Brad Kilby) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, by calling 503-639-4171, or by e-mail to bradley@ci.tigard.or.us. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2004- 00002/ADJUSTMENTS (VAR) 2004-00014,15,16 & 17 ® ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING FOR ST. VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETYR REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval to construct a 1,000 square foot, single-story storage building on a half-acre lot that is currently being used for parking. The applicant is also seeking approval of four (4) Adjustments to reduce the rear yard setback from 15 to 12 feet, to reduce the minimum landscaping requirement from 20% to 15%, to reduce the buffer width between the proposed use and adjacent uses, and to adjust the right-of-way requirements on SW McKenzie Street. LOCATION: 12630 SW Grant Avenue; WCTM 2S102BD, Tax Lot 800. ZONE: R-12-- Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at :a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapter- 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.75' 18,765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. VItlMRY MAP f ti CUPI004-Ml VAR2004 00014 J % . VAR2004-MIS i VAR2004.00016 1 / VAR2004-0001 T ST. ANTNONYY PARISH STORAGE BUILDING I L DE PAU ST. YINaNT TT 10390 - Publish April 22, 2004. 0 0 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER, VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. CITY OF TIGARD Community (DeveCopment CITY OF TIGARD ShapmgABetterCommunity PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY MAY 10, 2004 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER AT 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NOS.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2004-00002 DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2004-00014 DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2004-0001 S DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2004-00016 DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2004-00017 FILE TITLE: ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING FOR ST. VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY APPLICANT: St. Anthony's Parish OWNER: Roman Catholic Archbishop Attn: Leslie M. Selig Portland in Oregon 9905 SW McKenzie Street 2838 E. Burnside Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97214 APPLICANT'S Robert Klas, Architect REP.: 13283 SW Scottsbridge Drive Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval to construct a 1,000 square foot, single-story storage building on a half-acre lot that is currently being used for parking. The applicant is also seekin approval of four (4) Adjustments to reduce the rear yard setback from 15 to 1 feet, to reduce the minimum landscaping requirement from 20% to 15%, to reduce the buffer width between the proposed use and adjacent uses, and to adjust the right-of-way requirements on SW McKenzie Street. LOCATION: 12630 SW Grant Avenue; WCTM 2S1 0213D, Tax Lot 800. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18,765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. 0 9 ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 2438 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION LESS THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AN OPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25~) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25~) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER BRAD KILBY AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223, OR BY E-MAIL TO bradley@ci.tigard.or.us. J Cf A VI©KM MAP CUP2004-00002 VAR2004-00014 VAR2004.00015 VAR2004.00016 VAR2004-00011 ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING F01 ST. VINCENT DE PAUL Ciry of TiyN AGENDA ITEM NO.: 2.1 DATE: MAY 10, 2004 PAGE 1 OF 1 FILE NAME: ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE FACILITY CASE NOS.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2004-00002 DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS (VAR) 2004-00014, IS, 16 & 17 IF YOU WISH TO TESTIFY ON THE ITEM INDICATED ABOVE, PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME, ADDRESS & INCLUDE YOUR ZIP CODE PROPONENT - (Speaking In Favor or Neutral) OPPONENT - (Speaking Against) Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. + Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. f3~~'~~~ S 1 f 32~ S ~y S c.o iTS~E? t~-~.~ Tt eD t OR 1D'122'3 '503-5,3o- -?I(o 1 Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. I Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. ~s L;& :5,,'66 i3CiG~- 50 44 f~~~ ~t 1 Name, Address,Tip Code and Phone No. I Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. 1)-6 If Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No 7 Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. Geov6 c, S03 Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. 4 Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. k 9 IV S 'c /55- CGt e-,4 1 /a 190 S N+/ FiQ/96FA V EM w0 y 3`1,5AA J/ 0AA-' C/7:2a3 1 Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. ellLiC k LSA 3/A✓ 1 1-4 9 2 5 S %,-r 0,(-S v, 7'i cn92~ o IZej- 7 Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. 1 I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. I Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No 1 BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by St. Anthony's Parish ) FINAL ORDER for a conditional use permit and four variances ) CUP 2004-00002 (adjustments) for an accessory storage building at ) VAR 2004-0014 to -0017 12630 SW Grant Avenue in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) (St. Anthony Storage Bldg) A. SUMMARY 1. The applicant, Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland represented by St. Anthony's Parish Priest Leslie Sieg and Architect Robert Klas, requests approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) and related adjustments for a major modification to an existing church, school and accessory uses. 2. The site is Tax Lot 800 (WCTM 2S10213D). The site is the southwest quadrant of the intersection of McKenzie Street and Grant Avenue. I The site contains 0.48 acre (21,018 square feet).2 It is zoned R-12 (Medium Density Residential). It is developed with a parking lot containing 52 spaces and landscaping. There is one access driveway onto McKenzie Street about 30 feet from the east property line, and one access driveway onto Grant Street about 25 feet from the south property line. 3. The applicant now proposes to replace six parking spaces on the site with a 1000-square foot, one-story storage building to be used for collection of donated goods by St. Vincent Depaul. St. Vincent Depaul personnel will collect donations from vehicles one-at-a-time on weekdays only. The applicant also will extend a paved pedestrian pathway from the storage building east and north to the existing sidewalk along McKenzie Street and will enhance the landscaping on the remainder of the site. 4. The applicant also requests approval of several adjustments and one variance. The applicant proposes a three-foot adjustment to the 15-foot rear yard setback requirement and a five-percent adjustment to the minimum twenty-percent landscape area requirement. The applicant also proposes a five-foot adjustment to the ten-foot interior side yard requirement and a one-foot variance to the six-foot buffer requirement on the south side of the storage building. The applicant also proposes an adjustment to the street width and improvement standards for McKenzie Street and to the timing of improvements. 5. City hearings officer Larry Epstein (the "hearings officer") held a duly noticed public hearing regarding the application. City staff recommended that the hearings officer approve the CUP and all but one of the adjustments and variance. Father Sieg and Mr. Klas testified for the applicant and accepted the findings and conditions of approvals I The applicant owns other parcels north of McKenzie Street and west of Grant Street on which it has developed and is redeveloping a church, schools, a convent and related activities. 2 According to the Washington County Assessor's Map, the site contains .44 acres (19,166 square feet). • • recommended by City staff with certain exceptions and clarifications. The applicant waived its right to have the record held open. The hearings officer closed the record at the end of the hearing and announced his intention to approve the conditional use permit subject to conditions recommended by staff with modifications described more herein. 6. For the reasons stated herein, the hearings officer approves the conditional use permit for the storage building and related adjustments and variance, subject to the conditions at the end of this final order. B. HEARING AND RECORD 1. The hearings officer received testimony at the public hearing about this application on May 10, 2004. All exhibits and records of testimony are filed with the Tigard Department of Community Development. At the beginning of the hearing, the hearings officer made the declaration required by ORS 197.763. The hearings officer disclaimed any ex parte contacts, bias or conflicts of interest. The following is a summary by the hearings officer of selected testimony offered at the public hearing in this matter. 2. City planning manager Dick Bewersdorff summarized the Staff Report to the Hearings Officer dated May 3, 2004 (the "Staff Report"). 3. Robert Klas and Father Sieg testified for the applicant. a. Mr. Klas discussed where the storage structure will be situated. It will be five feet from the side (south) property line. Tigard Community Development Code ("CDC") Table 18.510.2 does not contain a setback standard for an accessory structure. It contains a setback for single-family homes and for multi-family homes. Mr. Klas argued that the proposed structure should be treated as a single-family home for purposes of the side yard setback. The hearings officer agreed, given the small size of the structure. b. Regarding proposed condition of approval 1, he testified that the applicant will improve a pedestrian route to the sidewalk that is grade-separated from the parking lot portion of the site, as illustrated on the exhibit submitted at the hearing. The exhibit also shows that there are no obstructions to sight distance at the driveways, which addresses condition of approval 7. He testified that the applicant agrees to recommended conditions of approval 2 and 3, although the pine trees discussed in the Staff Report are well off the property and separated from the site by a five-foot high cedar fence. The applicant will work with an arborist to ensure those trees are protected from development. He said the applicant will comply with conditions of approval 4 and 5 to the extent necessary. There is sanitary service in Grant Street, and water and electric service in McKenzie Street, which is all the applicant plans to affect in the right of way. Regarding proposed condition of approval 8, Mr. Klas testified the applicant will dedicate right of way for Grant Street as shown on the preliminary plans. c. Regarding condition of approval 9, the applicant wants to defer dedication and improvement of the south half of McKenzie Street until the north half of CUP 2004-00002 and VAR 2002-00014 to -00017 Hearings Officer Final Order (St. Anthony's storage building) Page 2 • • the street is dedicated and improved in conjunction with the development of the second phase of the redevelopment plan approved in CUP 2002-00004. The applicant wants approval to use a "skinny street" standard for McKenzie Street, with a 25-foot half-width (to conform to the north half-width of the street required in CUP 2002-00004). CDC Figure 18.810.4 allows use of a skinny street with a 50-foot right of way for streets carrying fewer than 1500 vehicles per day (VPD). He introduced an exhibit from a traffic engineer showing that the street carries fewer than 700 VPD. (See Appendix A of the May 4, 2004 memorandum from Judith Gray to Kim McMillan.) He argued that the street serves single-family homes, too. He testified that the applicant will sign an agreement with the City to make future improvements consistent with the skinny street standard and requested that the hearings officer modify condition of approval 10 to allow it. He noted the need to coordinate sidewalk and planting strips to be consistent. He argued that the existing sidewalk and curb are in good condition, and it would be inefficient to require the sidewalk to be rebuilt, and would be disproportionate given that the proposed structure merely shifts the St. Vincent Depaul activity to the subject site from a location to the north morel interior to the church properties. The result effectively causes no additional traffic. He argued that the conditions of approval are unclear, and asked the hearings officer to clarify what street improvements the applicant would be required to provide. d. Father Sieg testified that the applicant improved part of the north half of McKenzie Street in conjunction with phase la of the approved redevelopment plan for church land to the north. That side of the street has a curb-tight sidewalk. He argued that the existing sidewalks on the Grant and McKenzie Street frontages are nonconforming improvements, and the City should not require the applicant to rebuild them as a condition of this project. He waived the applicant's right to submit a closing written argument. 4. Mr. Bewersdorff agreed that McKenzie Street qualifies for the skinny street standard, based on the new evidence in the record. 5. The hearings officer closed the record at the end of the hearing. He announced an intention to approve the application for the conditional use permit, to approve the variances and adjustments, subject generally to the conditions of approval the City staff recommended with amendments warranted by the discussion. C. DISCUSSION 1. City staff provided basic facts about the site and its vicinity and existing and proposed uses in the Staff Report. Ultimately they recommended that the hearings officer approve the application for the conditional use permit and the adjustments and variance, including the use of a skinny street standard. The applicant accepted most of the findings and recommended conditions with the exceptions described more below. Except to the extent the Staff Report is inconsistent with this final order, the hearings officer adopts as his own the findings and conclusions in the Staff Report. CUP 2004-00002 and VAR 2002-00014 to -00017 Hearings Ojftcer Final Order (St. Anthony's storage building) Page 3 2. Regarding the conditional use permit, substantial evidence in the record shows that the proposed use does or can comply with the applicable standards for a conditional use permit. That evidence and those findings were not rebutted. The hearings officer relies on the Staff Report for relevant findings and citation to supporting evidence on these issues. 3. Regarding the adjustments and variance supported by City staff, the hearings officer agrees that substantial evidence in the record supports the necessary findings that those adjustments and variances comply with applicable CDC approval standards. That evidence and those findings were not rebutted. The hearings officer relies on the Staff Report for relevant findings and citation to supporting evidence on these issues. The hearings officer also construes CDC Table 18.510.2 to apply the side yard setback for a single family detached dwelling to the structure in this case, so that the proposed five-foot setback complies with that table. 4. In the Staff Report, City staff recommended that the hearings officer deny the adjustment to street improvement requirements or to allow use of a skinny street standard, because the applicant failed to sustain the burden of proof. At the hearing City staff concluded that use of skinny street standards should be allowed, based on new evidence and argument submitted at and shortly before the hearing. The hearings officer relies on the findings in the May 4 memorandum from Judith Gray to Kim McMillan and the evidence cited therein to conclude that McKenzie Street should be dedicated and improved to skinny street standards consistent with CDC Figure 18.810A.B. Reference to the figure clarifies what improvements the applicant is required to make, except that the planting strip is not required, and the sidewalk can be curb-tight. 5. The CDC clearly requires the applicant to dedicate and improve half-width rights of way adjoining the site as a condition of approval to the extent that it is proportionate to the impact of the proposed development.3 The CDC also clearly allows adjustments to the street improvement standards, but not to dedication requirements.4 In CDC 18.810.030.A(3) and (4) provide as follows: (3) No development shall occur unless the streets adjacent to the development meet the standards of this chapter, provided, however, that a development may be approved if the adjacent street does not meet the standards but half-street improvements meeting the standards of this title are constructed adjacent to the development. (4) Any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall meet the standards of this chapter; But CDC 18.810.020.A provides as follows in relevant part: Applicants may be required to dedicate land and build required public improvements only when the required exaction is directly related to and roughly proportional to the impact of the development. Also CDC 18.810.030.A(7) provides as follows in relevant part: The approval authority may also approve adjustments to the standards of this chapter if compliance with the standards would have a substantial adverse impact on existing development... 4 CDC 18.810.020.1) provides as follows: CUP 2004-00002 and VAR 2002-00014 to -00017 Hearings Ojfcer Final Order (St. Anthony's storage building) Page 4 • • this case, the application has little impact on the need for sidewalks, because the activity proposed for the storage building, i.e., receiving donations for St. Vincent Depaul, already exists elsewhere on the site. In light of that and CDC 18.810.070.C, the hearings officer finds that the applicant should not be required to rebuild the sidewalks abutting the McKenzie or Grant Street frontages of the site to provide planter strips between the sidewalk and the curb.5 6. The applicant also proposed to defer dedication and improvement of McKenzie Street (to the extent dedication and improvements are required in light of the foregoing finding). The hearings officer understands that some additional improvement of McKenzie Street might be required. The hearings officer also understands that there might be efficiencies or other merits to deferring construction of additional needed improvements to McKenzie Street until Phase lb of the church redevelopment plan. The CDC allows deferring improvements but not dedications.6 Therefore dedication of a minimum 25-foot half-width cannot be deferred. Without deciding the issue, the hearings officer acknowledges that it might be appropriate to defer street trees (or other improvements) on the south half-width of the street so that both sides of the street are improved at one time. Therefore the hearings officer finds that authority should be delegated to the City Engineer to defer frontage improvements consistent with CDC 18.810.020.D. If the City Engineer defers improvements, the applicant should be required to enter into an appropriate agreement to complete the improvements when timely. See conditions 6 and 10. 7. To the extent that the Staff Report is unclear about where the pine trees are situated east of the parking lot, the hearings officer finds that they are separated from the site by a five-foot high cedar fence and several feet. The CDC requires the applicant to protect the trees, and a reasoned plan such as that required by condition of approval 2 is warranted for that purpose. The distance between development and the trees will minimize potential impacts if grading and compaction do not occur in the root zone of the trees. Adjustments to the provisions in this chapter related to street improvements may be granted by means of a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria in Section 18.370.030 C9 5 CDC 18.810.070.C provides as follows in relevant part: A planter strip separation of at least five feet between the curb and the sidewalk shall be required in the design of streets, except where the following conditions exist:... the curbside sidewalks already exist on predominant portions of the street... 6 CDC 18.810.030.A(5) provides as follows in relevant part: If the City could and would otherwise require the applicant to provide street improvements, the City Engineer may accept a fixture improvements guarantee in lieu of street improvements if one or more of the following conditions exist: (f) Additional planning work is required to define the appropriate design standards for the street and the application is for a project which would contribute only a minor portion of the anticipated future traffic on the street. The hearings officer deferred street tree requirements on the north side of McKenzie Street as part of the decision in CUP 2002-00004. CUP 2004-00002 and VAR 2002-00014 to -00017 Hearings OJJcer Final Order (St. Anthony's storage building) Page 5 • • 8. Recommended conditions of approval should be construed consistent with the discussion above and the testimony at the hearing and should be amended as necessary. For instance, condition of approval 1 should be amended to reflect introduction and adequacy of the pedestrian path to the building and to require the applicant to submit and implement (or guarantee) a proposed landscaping plan for the site. Condition of approval 9 should be amended to reflect skinny street standards. Condition of approval 10 should be amended to be consistent with condition 6 by allowing the applicant to enter into an agreement to make street improvements in the future. D. CONCLUSIONS The hearings officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit, adjustments and variance do or can comply with the applicable approval criteria and standards of the Tigard Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to ensure such compliance occurs. E. DECISION The hearings officer hereby approves CUP 2004-00002 (St. Anthony Storage Building), and associated adjustments and variance identified as VAR 2004-00014 to - 00017 as described herein, subject to the conditions of approval in the Staff Report with the following amendments: 1. Condition of annroval 1 is hereby amended to read as follows: The applicant shall provide a pedestrian walkway from the storage building entry to the public sidewalk along McKenzie Street. The walkway shall be four feet wide, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks and signposts, and shall comply with ADA standards. The walkway shall be separated from maneuvering and parking spaces by a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation. The plan the applicant submitted at the hearing is one acceptable way of complying with this condition of approval. The applicant also shall submit and implement (or guarantee implementation of) a proposed landscape enhancement plan for the site. 2. Condition of annroval 9 is hereby amended to read as follows: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall dedicate additional right of way along the McKenzie Street frontage to provide 25 feet total from centerline. 3. Condition of approval 10 is hereby amended to read as follows: CUP 2004-00002 and VAR 2002-00014 to -00017 Hearings Officer Final Order (St. Anthony's storage building) Page 6 Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall either: (a) complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements, or (b) enter into an agreement acceptable to the City to undertake improvements in the future. Larry Epstein, Esq., AICP City of Tigard Land Use Hearings Officer DATED this 15` da of June, 2004. a J CUP 2004-00002 and VAR 2002-00014 to -00017 Hearings Officer Final Order (St. Anthony's storage building) Page 7 0 0 "TAB A" Testimony Received at the Public Hearing. •v ~ Page 1 of 1 EKA From: "Judith Gray" <JG RAY@ kittelson.com> To: <kim@ci.tigard.or.us> Cc: <Bradley@ci.tigard.or.us>; <eka@teleport.com>; "Judith Gray" <JG RAY@ kittelson.com> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 01:02 PM Attach: 5610 skinny street memo.pdf Subject: St. Anthony's Parish: McKenzie Street R/W Hi Kim, I'm attaching a memorandum addressing the 4 criteria for the skinny street option on local streets. I'm sorry to be getting this to you at such a late date. We were delayed waiting for traffic counts from Mike. When we found out he wouldn't be conducting them, we did our own and put this together as quickly as we could. Please give me a call on Monday so we can discuss this, as well as a couple other issues from the staff report for this project. I realize you'll just be getting back to the office, but the hearing is Monday night so I'm definitely hoping to talk to you before that. Thanks Judith Gray Senior Transportation Planner Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 610 SW Alder Street, Suite 700 Portland, OR 97205-3608 www.kittelson.com iarav@kittelson.com 503-228-5230 503-273-8169 (fax) Transportation Planning /Traffic Engineering Baltimore I Boise I Fort Lauderdale I Orlando I Portland 5/6/04 0 • off. &ASSOCIATES:.INS,. TR NSPQRTATON PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGIN EERINQ 610 S* ALDER, a1 Tn 7W ~?oF#~9 R1~i~ RJR 2l b { 3# "28'•;$yaQ $16v L TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM St. Anthony's Church Storage Building for St. Vincent DePaul Society Request for Skinny Street Designation for SW McKenzie Street Date: May 4, 2004 Project 5610.02 To: Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer From: Judith Gray cc: Robert Klas, STOA International/EKA St. Anthony's Church is proposing to construct a storage building in the southeast quadrant of the SW Grant Avenue/SW McKenzie Street intersection in Tigard, Oregon. The storage building will be used by the St. Vincent DePaul Society to store food donations for distribution. The proposed building will replace an existing storage budding located on the northeast quadrant of the same intersection. As such, no change in traffic volumes and overall traffic conditions in the vicinity are expected to result from this project. At the current location, all vehicles entering the site utilize a single driveway on SW McKenzie Street; in the proposed new location, vehicle trips would be distributed between two site driveways (one on SW McKenzie Street and one on SW Grant Avenue). SW McKenzie Street is designated a Local Residential Street with standard right of way of 54 feet. St. Anthony's Church is requesting that this section of SW McKenzie Street be designed according to the City of Tigard skinny street option , as described in Figure 18.810.4 of the City of Tigard Development Code. The Code identifies four criteria for the skinny street option to be applied. These are described below along with their applicability to the proposed project. 1. A traffic flow plan is required. The section of SW McKenzie Street between Highway 99 and SW Grant Avenue is a one-way street in the westbound direction. The skinny street standards have 28 feet of pavement width to accommodate a single travel lane and parking on both sides of the street. Given the one-way traffic flow, only a single travel lane will be needed and the roadway can operate safely and efficiently with the skinny street standards. FMENAME: HAprojrde\5610\Phase 2\reporl\5610 skinny street memo.doc • St. Anthonv's Church Mav 4, 2004 Project 5610.02 Page 2 The proposed storage building will be accessed via one existing driveway on SW Grant Avenue and one existing driveway on SW McKenzie Street. The driveways also serve an existing parking area that serves the other church uses. Both driveways are designed with 24-foot cross sections, which is adequate to accommodate safe and efficient travel of emergency vehicles, service vehicles, and passenger vehicles. The SW McKenzie Street driveway is located more than 150 feet east of the SW Grant Avenue intersection, which can accommodate approximately six passenger vehicles without encroaching on the intersection. The on-site parking layout is designed in a manner that can accommodate safe and efficient maneuvering of vehicles within the parking lot. 2. According to the Code, the skinny street option is appropriate for streets serving no more than 1,000 vehicles per day. Continuous bi-directional traffic counts were conducted on SW McKenzie Street between Monday April 26 and Friday April 30, 2004. The average daily traffic based on the 24-hour volumes for Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday is approximately 700 vehicles per day. Therefore, this criterion is met. The traffic counts are provided in Attachment A. 3. The skinny street option requires that no on-street parking be provided within 30 feet of an intersection. This criterion can be met in the completion of the site design process. 4. The skinny street option is appropriate for streets adjacent to single-family detached developments. SW McKenzie Street is located within a residential neighborhood of single- family detached homes. Therefore, this criterion is met. We trust that this memorandum adequately addresses the requirements for use of the skinny street option design standards for residential streets. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon • • Attachment A SW McKenzie Street Traffic Counts • • Quality Counts, LLC 16285 SW 85th Ave, Ste 105 Site Code: 10036101 Tigard, OR 97224 Site Code: 10036101 Station ID: Tubes were placed on McKenzie 75 ft west of Hwy 99W Latitude: 0'0.000 Undefined Start Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Sat Sun Week Time 26-ADr-04 27-Apr-04 28-ADr-04 29-Air-04 30-ADr-04 Qav 01-Mev-04 02-Mav-04 Averasle 12:00 AM 0 0 0 4 1 11 Qt;DO 1 0 Q! 0 02:00 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 h o ' 1I 1 1r1 04:00 1 0 ' 1 1 05190 16 1& 16 14- 16 16'0 06:00 82 86 84 84 84 841 €I 07:00 40 44 36 43 43, 0800 14 38 25 36 28 28 r< 09M 26 60 31 I' 39 391 1 ' 10100 34 37 39 37 37 1 1 11:00 60 52 55 56 5,, 12:00 PM 46 71 40 52 521 07:00 58 r, 59 55 55',1 I 02,00 67 ao 52 521 _ 03:00 56 36 43 45 45, 04.00 46 44 51 47 471 ' 1 05:00 65 36 47 471 1 06:00 32 32 44 36 361 07 00 26 29 26 27 27', : 08:00 12 10 12 18 13 13 99:00 7 15 y g..,. 10 10 10:00 5 6 4 4 5 50 l1 00 2 2 1 3` 2 270 Day Total 26 705 712 679 177 698 0 0 698 %Avg. 3.7% 101.0% 102.09/6 97.3% 25.4% WKDay % Avvg . 3.7% 101.0% 102.0% 97.3% 25 4% 1OD 0% 0 0% 0 0% g. . . . . AM Peak 06:00 06:00 06:00 06:00 06:00 06:00 Vol. 82 86 84 84 84 84 PM Peak 20:00 14:00 1200 13:00 13:00 13:00 Vol. 12 67 71 59 55 55 Grand Total 26 705 712 679 177 696 0 0 698 Page 1 0 • ADT ADT 649 AADT 649 a • Figure [8.5103 . Neighborhood Routes Sample Cross Sections (Ord. 02-33) tr H 5' 5:5 t -..._.._.8'., 5.5' 32' ; 5.5' PAN 50' WW 54' Ato Parking on One Side Wlih Par ng on Both Sides 5' 5_5' .6' tike. IT IT RAN 58'. { P 1 Wfh iSike l ameslft ParWng Figure 18.810.4 Local Rcsidentiat Streets - X1,500 vpd (Ord. 02-33) A. Standard (sample) 31af'" 32' i RtW 54' On-street Faiklt'tg MM* lrpartking on both sides, block length not to exceed 600 feet 8. Skinny Street Option (criteria) Mho K"/ i y. Is•rw 1 ~ ~ C. Criteria: • Traffic Flow Plan must be submitted and approved. • Not appropriate for streets scrvitto more than 1,000 vpd. • No parking permitted within 30 rect of an intersection: • Appropriate adjacent to single family detached development only. Street Utility Improvement Standards 18.810-9 Code Update: 10102 • St Vincent DePauf Storage Building rT PARKING MH M" T' Z (E) CB PARKING T 14'TRAVEL LANE - S.W. McKENZIE STREET T PARKING - ♦-ONEWAY - - - - - - - 24'-0• - PARKING (E) C8 EXISTING I DRIVEWAY mow • k . SON:~ _ ea't• ~ yr ( ~ ~ t t SGN t SGN v *SCV N57'49'38W19375' •SGN (E) EE FH 4pp~ a Q 5c,1 ~ T ~ P ~ Y ~R/ yS ~ p F 3 n k, ' Wa ~IJ ~ fn 1 J a a t ■ ` KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING /TRAFFIC ENGINEERING b 4*3 b Typ.s p, 9.-0' TYP,~ 0 (E) LP N57-49'38'W 207,57' 8'-6' 4*3 b 4cm 9'-0' b t 1 ! ~ I co May2004 (130') el ~R i hz j f I I ~ 2 O to 19 u) 0 N w co a TRAFFIC FLOW PLAN TIGARD, OREGON • W ~r . o~ cd a Q S IW IOTTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. TAMI&vCffrATM PIANMM IIPJ6w IC BJGNMNB (1 30) N5704536'W 20751 r ~ 8 I b I~ z TRAFFIC FLOW PLAN TIGARD, OREGON S.W. McKENZIE STREET f1►1r IAl Av 4 b U iB O N N w to ~i a Co to 1 a x r' M f~ r( ~ r f r ~ r j, I i I 4S''n s r T1 a iy,i, r~1 T, i 0 • • 0 Yea, j I i 0 0 i G 0 0 f 0 0 • "TAB B" • Applicant's Materials & All Correspondence Filed with Hearings Officer Prior to the Public Hearing. • Agenda Item: 2.1 Hearing Date: Mav 10, 2004 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER CITY OFTIOARD, Community Development FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Shapiq.A Better Community 120 DAYS = 7/15/2004 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING CASE NOS: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) CUP2004-00002 Adjustment 'VAR VAR2004-00014 Adjustment VAR VAR2004-00015 Adjustment VAR VAR2004-00016 Adjustment VAR, VAR2004-00017 APPLICANT/ Roman Catholic Archbishop APPLICANT'S Robert Klas, Architect OWNER: of Portland in Oregon REPRESENTATIVE: 13283 SW Scottsbridge Dr. 2838 E. Burnside Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97214 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval to construct a 1,000 square foot, single-story storage building on a half-acre lot that is currently being used for parking. The applicant is also seeking approval of four (4) Adjustments to reduce the rear yard setback from 15 to 12 feet, to reduce the minimum landscaping requirement from 20% to 15%, to reduce the buffer width between the proposed use and adjacent uses, and to adjust the right-of-way requirements on SW McKenzie Street. LOCATION: 12630 SW Grant Avenue; WCTM 2S102BD, Tax Lot 800. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN and ZONING DESIGNATION: R-12, Medium-Density Residential District. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff would prefer to recommend approval. However, while the majority of the record provides a basis for making affirmative findings, the applicant has not provided findings that demonstrate how the proposed project meets all street improvement requirements. The code requires that all projects meet the standards. The applicant provides no justification for adjustments to SW McKenzie Street. Unless the applicant indicates they will meet the standards or justifies the adjustment to the satisfaction of the Hearings Officer, we cannot recommend approval. All other adjustments are found to meet approval standards. Conditions of approval are included should a justification satisfactory to the Hearings Officer be made. The conditions include conditions which will provide for meeting all standards. ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING PAGE 1 OF 20 CUP2004-00002NAR2004-00014-00017 5/10/2004 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Planning Department (Brad-Kirby, 639-4M, ext. 24Wfor review and approval: 1. The applicant shall provide a revised access plan that provides a safe pedestrian walkway extending from the entrance of the building to SW McKenzie Street. The walkway shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and signposts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. The walkway shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-Inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the City Arborist with a tree protection plan, and a construction sequence including installation and removal of tree protection devices, clearing, grading, and paving. 3. The applicant shall notify the City Arborist when tree protection measures are in place so that he may verify that the measures will function properly prior to construction. Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 4. Prior to commencing onsite improvements, Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover the street work in Grant Avenue and McKenzie Street and any other work in the public right-of-way (ROW). Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tioard.or.us). 5. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 6. The applicant shall submit plans for half-street improvements along Grant Avenue and McKenzie Street or enter into an agreement for future street improvements. 7. The applicant's engineer shall provide sight-distance certification for both access points. 8. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall dedicate additional right-of- way along their frontage on Grant Avenue to provide 27 feet total from centerline. 9. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall dedicate additional right-of-way along their frontage on McKenzie Street to provide 27 feet total from centerline. ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING PAGE 2 OF 20 CUP2004-00002NAR2004-00014-00017 5/10/2004 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to t>fngineering Department (Kim W-Niiflan, 639-4M, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 10. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 11. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1 3 mil mylar, 2) a diskette of the as- builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable, and 3) the as- built drawings shall be tied to the City's GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 18 MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION SHALL RENDER THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION VOID. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Histo : St. Anthony's Catholic Church has occupied the neighboring property for quite some time. The site currently serves as a parking lot for the church, and there are no land use cases associated with this site within the City of Tigard data bases. Vicinitv Information: The site is zoned-R-12 which is a medium density designation in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Properties located to the south, east, and west of this site are zoned either R-12 or C-G, which is a commercial designation in the Comprehensive Plan. Properties located to the north of the site are zoned R-4.5, a low density designation in the Comprehensive Plan. The site is surrounded by a mixture of single-family residences, small businesses, and the St. Anthony's Church campus. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is currently developed as a parking facility for the adjacent church campus. The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval to construct a 1,000 square foot, single-story storage building on a half-acre lot that is currently being used for parking. The applicant is also seeking approval of four (4) Adjustments to reduce the rear yard setback from 15 to 12 feet, to reduce the minimum landscaping requirement from 20% to 15%, to reduce the buffer width between the proposed use and adjacent uses, and to adjust the right-of-way requirements on SW McKenzie Street. SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 Lists the se C-aFegories. The applicant is proposing to place a 1,000 square foot single-story storage facility for the purpose of distributing food. The storage facility is operated by St. Vincent De aul under the supervision of the hurch, and is considered by the City to be a Social/Fraternal use. Social/Fraternal uses are defined as non-profit organizations with social, philanthropic functions and activities. Social/Fraternal uses are permitted conditionally within the R-12 zoning district. ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING PAGE 3 OF 20 CUP2004-00002NAR2004-00014-00017 5/10/2004 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 0 0 The adjustments that have been requested are typically reviewed administratively. However, when different requests are reviewed concurrently, the highest review authority renders the decision on all matters in the application. In this case, the application is subject to a public hearing before the City of Tigard Hearings Officer. Summary Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 Dines the decision-making type to which the land-use application is assigned. The proposed Conditional Use permit is a Type III-HO decision. The proposed adjustments are subject to a Type II administrative decision. SECTION V. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS The Tigard Community Development Code requires that property owners within 500 feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal, and be given an opportunity for written comments and/or oral testimonprior to a decision being made. In addition, the applicant is required to post the site with notice of the public hearing. Staff has verified that the site is posted. Staff has not received any comments from any property owners as of the date of this staff report. SECTION VI. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case, in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this report are as follows: A. Specific Conditional Use Criteria General Approval Griteria) Additional Conditions of Approval) B. Applicable DevelogmentpCode Standards 18.330 conditional Uses) 18.360 Site Development Review) 18.370 Variances and Adjustments) 18.510 Residential Zoning 18.705 Access, Egress & irculation 18.725 Environmental Performance tandards) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening 18.755 Mixed Solid-Waste & Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) C. Additional Site Development Review Approval Standards D. street and IJEU Mm rovement Standards R E. !Lnpact u R SECTION VII. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL CRITERIA "Section 18.330.010 states the purpose ofThis cfi-a--pter is to provide standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and analysis. Section 18.330.020.A states that a request for approval for a new conditional use shall be processed as a Type III-HO procedure, as regulated by Chapter 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.330.030A and subject to other requirements in Chapter 18.330. ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING PAGE 4 OF 20 CUP2004-00002/VAR2004-00014-00017 5/10/2004 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • 0 General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use: Section 18.330.030: The site size andaimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; The existing site size is 21,018 square feet in size. This report evaluates the proposal and necessary review criteria for the site. The site size appears adequate for the needs of the proposed storage facility. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features; There are no apparent natural features on this site, and the size, shape, and location are not extraordinary. The site is located on the boundary of the R-4.5 zoning district, but is surrounded by a mixture of multi and single-family residences. The site is suitable for the proposed use. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; and According to the comments received, all public facilities including streets, storm and sanitary sewers, and water can adequately serve the site. This criterion is satisfied. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. The following table provides the dimensional standards in the R-12 zone, the additional dimensional requirements for social/fraternal uses are specified in the Conditional Use Standards of Section 18.330.050.13.12 and the dimensions proposed for this development. STANDARD Minimum Lot Size Minimum Lot Width Minimum Setbacks Front yard Side facing street on corner & through lots Side yard Rear yard Maximum lielght Maximum Site Coverage [2] Minimum Landscape Requirement R-12 CONDITIONAL USE PROPOSED REQUIREMENT 3,050 sq. ft. 20,000 sq. ft 21,018 sq. ft n/a SAME AS R-12 92 ft 20 ft SAME AS R-12 173 ft. Grant St. 20 ft SAME AS R-12 47 ft to McKenzie St. loft SAME AS R-12 5 ft 20 ft SAME AS R-12 12 ft 35 ft. I SAME AS R-12 Approximately 12.6 ft 80% SAME AS R-12 85% [2] 20% I SAME AS R-12 15% [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. a The application fails to meet the dimensional requirements of the underlying zone for maximum site coverage, and minimum landscape requirement. However, the applicant has requested an adjustment to these standards. The adjustment is addressed later in this report. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this Code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met or can be conditioned to be satisfied. The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Community Development Code: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Development Review; 1837Q, Variances and Adjustments; 18.390, Decision Making Procedures-, 18.510, Residential Zoning Districts; 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation- 18.725, nvironmental Performance Standards; 18.745 Landscaping and Screening; 18.55, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage; 18.765, dff-Street Parking; 18.790, Tree Removal- 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas- and T8.810, Street and Utility Improvement Standards. The development standards and requirements of these chapters are addressed further in this report. ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING PAGE 5 OF 20 CUP2004-00002/VAR2004-00014-00017 5/10/2004 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • 0 The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following chapters: 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710, Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations 18.720, Design Compatibility Standards; 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standard; 18.40, Historic Overlay; (8.742, Home Occupations- 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations; 18.760 Nonconforming Situations; 18.75, Sensitive Lands; 18.780, Temporary Uses; and 1098, Wireless Communications Facilities. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is implemented by the Community Development Code. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan policies are, therefore, assured by satisfaction of the applicable development standards of the development code as addressed within this report. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, and the conditions imposed on the development, the General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use can be satisfied. Additional Conditions of A roval for Conditional Use. section saes a e earings ►u hority may impose conditions on the approval of a conditional use, which are found necessary to ensure the use is compatible with other uses in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding uses and public facilities is minimized. These conditions may include, but are not limited to the following: Limiting the hours, days, place and/or manner of operation; According to the applicant, the facility distributes food to the needy only on weekdays. A search of the City's code enforcement records shows no complaints against the existing operations of the facility on the church campus. Staff does not find any justification to impose conditions limiting the hours, days, and/or manner of operation. Requiring design features, which minimize environmental impacts such as noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust; The hazards related to odor, dust, noise, glare, air pollution, and vibration can be mitigated through the design of the building and the buffering and landscaping of the use. Those hazards that are inherent during construction will be held to the same standards as other construction within the City of Tigard as regulated by the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC). All of these items will be subject fo code enforcement review if the applicant exceeds the allowed levels. Requiring additional setback areas, lot area, and/or lot depth or width; The applicant has requested an adjustment to the rear yard setback. That adjustment is discussed in detail later in this report. Staff finds no justification to increase the lot area, lot depth, or width for this use. Limiting the building height, size or lot coverage, and/or location on the site; Based on the plans submitted, the applicant has designed and placed the building such that it meets the underlying zone requirements except for the rear yard setback along the southern property line. An adjustment to this standard is discussed in detail later in this report. Designating the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points; The applicant is proposing to utilize the existing access points into the site. The access is discussed in more detail later in this report. Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved; Street dedications have been requested and are addressed later in this report. ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING PAGE 6 OF 20 CUP2004-00002NAR2004-00014-00017 5/10/2004 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage and/or surfacing of parking and loading areas; Landscaping, screening, drainage, and parking have been addressed individually and in more detail later in this report. Limiting the number, size, location, height and/or lighting of signs; There are no new signs proposed at this time, and the applicant has indicated that any new signage will be applied for at a later date. Compliance with the sign requirements for the underlying zone will be considered once an application is submitted. Limiting or setting standards for the location and/or intensity of outdoor lighting; The applicant has proposed to utilize the existing lighting within the parking area. The existing lighting appears to be adequate for this use. Requiring berms, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for their installation and maintenance; Staff will address screening and landscaping later in this report. Requiring and designating the size, height, location and/or materials for fences; This criterion is addressed in more detail under landscaping and screening. Requiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, soils, vegetation, watercourses, habitat areas and/or drainage areas; The applicant has provided a tree preservation plan that will be discussed further in this report. The applicant has indicated that no trees will be removed to accommodate the proposed construction. There are no watercourses, habitat areas, drainage areas, or vegetation other than domesticated that will be affected by this proposal. Requiring the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain when land form alterations and development are allowed within the 100-year floodplain; and This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain; therefore, a condition is not necessary. Requiring the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, a condition is not necessary. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Site Development Review - Chapter 18.360: he Site eveiopmenfReview approvaFstandards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Variances and Adiustments - Chapter 18.370: The appiicanf"nas requesfec~tour separate acfjustments. Each adjustment is discussed in detail in the following segment of this report. ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING PAGE 7 OF 20 CUP2004-00002NAR2004-00014-00017 5/10/2004 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • The applicant has requested a 3-foot adjustment to the rear yard setback, and an adjustment of 5% to the amount of coverage. The Tigard Development Code (TDC) Section 18.370.020(B)(1)(b) allows up to a 20/a reduction of the dimensional standards for the side and rear yard setbacks required in the base zone, and TDC Section 18.370.020(B)(1)(c) allows up to a 5% increase in lot coverage provided the following criteria are addressed. Both of these adjustments are addressed in the following discussion. A demonstration that the Adjustment requested is the least required to achieve the desired affect; The two adjustments are being requested to allow the proposed structure to protrude into the rear yard setback by three feet, and to allow the site to maintain a landscape requirement of 15% as opposed to the required 20% in the R-12 zone. According to the applicant this is the minimum relief needed to allow placement of the proposed structure and still maintain the minimum number of parking spaces required by the Church campus. The TDC requires that the facility provide 233 parking spaces on site for a seating capacity of 700 within the main sanctuary. According to the last application filed by the Church there are currently 249 spaces available for parking including the two accessory parking lots. Phase1 B of the previously approved expansion requires the removal of 16 spaces bringing the parking available to 233. However, Phase 1B has not been constructed, and a condition has been placed on that approval to ensure that the facility still meets the minimum parking requirements of 233 spaces prior to the issuance of building permits. So, with the removal of six additional spaces to accommodate the storage facility, the Church campus will still have 243 spaces available. This fi ure exceeds the minimum required by ten, and the condition will still stand should Phase 1 be realized. The Adjustment will result in the preservation of trees, if trees are present in the development area; There are no trees within the development area that will be adversely affected by granting these two adjustments. This criterion is satisfied. The Adjustment will not impede adequate emergency access to the site; These Adjustments will not impede emergency access. Emergency service can still access this site from both existing driveways. There is not a reasonable alternative to the Adjustment which achieves the desired affect. Because of the proposed location of the facility and the need to conserve the existing parking, there are no other alternatives to achieve the desired affect. The appplicant is proposing to increase the existing landscaping by 742 square feet to achieve site andscaping of 15%. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the setback and minimum coverage adjustment criteria have been satisfied. The applicant has requested a variance to the buffer and screening requirements of TDC Chapter 18.745 to allow a 5-foot buffer as opposed to the required 6-foot buffer. Section 18.370.010.C.2.a-e outlines the approval criterion for the granting of a variance to the standards. The proposed variance will not to any other applicable policies zoning district or vicinity. ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING 5/10/2004 PUBLIC HEARING be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, and standards, and to other properties in the same PAGE 8 OF 20 CUP2004-00002/VAR2004-00014-00017 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The applicant has requested a variance to the required buffer width only. No other applicable policies or standards will be affected. The variance is being requested to allow a pre-existing condition to remain on site. The variance would not be materially detrimental to other properties in this zoning district or the vicinity. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; The applicant has proposed to dress up the existing buffer and screening. While the applicant has ultimate control over the width of the buffer, the applicant must also maintain a specific number of parking spaces to accommodate the adjacent Church campus. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting reasonable economic use of the land; The use is conditionally permitted under this title, and appart from the standards to which the variance is being requested, all other City standards will be maintained. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic and forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were developed as specified in the title; and The existing hysical and natural systems will remain unchanged, as the parking lot is pre-existing. Therefore, this standard does not apply. The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance, which would alleviate the hardship. The hardship is not self-imposed; rather it is a function of an existing condition. The applicant has indicated that the existing buffer and screening area will be dressed up to fulfill the screening requirement. The 1-foot variance is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the variance criteria are satisfied. The applicant has applied for an adjustment to the street ROW width and improvement standards. The TDC Section 18.370.020(C)(11) allows the Director to approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for an adjustment to the street improvement requirements, based on findings that the following criterion is satisfied: Strict application of the standards will result in an unacceptably adverse impact on existing development, on the proposed development, or on natural features such as wetlands, steep slopes or existing mature trees. In approving an adjustment to the standards, the Director shall determine that the potential adverse impacts exceed the public benefits of strict application of the standards. The applicant refers to McKenzie as a "skinny" one-way street. McKenzie Street is a one-way street, but there is no current designation of "skinny" street. The applicant was told to provide traffic counts and findings to support either the Skinny Street Option or the smaller local street standard shown in Figure 18.810.5 for Local Residential Streets < 500 vehicles per day. FINDING: The applicant has not provided any information to support either adjustment option; therefore staff recommends that the applicant provide the Hearings Officer with justification that can serve as satisfactory findings for the adjustment, or propose that they will meet the standards for street improvements on SW McKenzie Street. ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING PAGE 9 OF 20 CUP2004-00002NAR2004-00014-00017 5/10/2004 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Residential Zoninq Districts - Chapter 18.510: The resiaen _@ zoning ais rric -aevepment standards are discussed previously in this report under the Conditional Use standards. It should be noted that Social/Philanthropic uses are permitted conditionally in all residential zones. Access E Less and Circulation - Chapter 18.705: Public Street Access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030(H) and 18.705.030(1) shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the city for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis; The site is surrounded on all two sides by public streets. The site currently has existing access from SW Grant and SW McKenzie streets. This criterion is satisfied. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The proposal involves the construction of a storage and food distribution building for a function of the church. The applicant is proposing to identify a walkway across the existing parking area by way of striping as opposed to constructing a sidewalk to the SW McKenzie Street right-of-way. The TDC requires that required walkways are physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking. The applicant is not proposing to separate the required walkway. Instead, the applicant has requested to stripe the required walkway with paint. This criterion is not satisfied. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; and The walkways have been identified on the site plan as just pavement markings, and they are discussed only briefly within the narrative. The applicant is not proposing to separate the walkway, or use contrasting pavement materials for the proposed walkway as required. This criterion is not satisfied. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The applicant has not adequately addressed this requirement. This criterion is not satisfied. FINDING: The applicant has not adequately addressed the requirement for a required walkway from the entrance of the facility to the SW McKenzie right-of-way. ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING PAGE 10 OF 20 CUP2004-00002/VAR2004-00014-00017 5/10/2004 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 0 0 CONDITION:The applicant shall provide a revised access plan that provides a safe pedestrian walkway extending from the entrance of the building to SW McKenzie Street. The walkway shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and signposts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. The walkway shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot onzontal separation. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with less than 99 parking spaces is one 30-foot-wide access with a 24- foot pavement width. The existing parking area has two, 30-foot-wide accesses to serve the site thereby exceeding the minimum requirement of one. This standard is satisfied. Access Managgement (Section 18.705.030.H): Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. The applicant has not provided any response to this section. This criterion is not satisfied. FINDING: The applicant did not address the access management standards as required by TDC Section 18.705.030(H)(1). CONDITION: Prior to the issuance of the site permit, the applicant's traffic engineer shall provide site distance certification for the driveways on SW McKenzie and SW Grant. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. The existing driveway on SW McKenzie is over 450 feet from the intersection at Highway 99W. This criterion is satisfied. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. None of the site driveways are along collector or arterial streets. Grant Street is classified as a neighborhood route, and SW McKenzie Street is classified as a local street. Environmental Performance Standards - Chapter 18.725: Requires fffa-ffeaerai anaFssfale environmenfaTlaws, ruffs and regulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 Performance Standards regulates: Noise, visible emissions, vibration and odors. ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING PAGE 11 OF 20 CUP2004-00002NAR2004-00014-00017 5/10/2004 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER i • Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.41.130 fhrougfi 7.40 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Visible Emissions. Within the Commercial zoning districts and the Industrial Park (I-P) zoning district, ere shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point- source emission other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of ure uncombinea water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department oT Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district, which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors. The emissions of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-099) apply. Glare and heat. No direct or sky reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and; 1) there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2) these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds saline maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. FINDING: Based on the information provided by the applicant, the expanded use of the property will conform to the above requirements. If for some reason the above standards were in question, and it was subsequently found that the use was out of compliance with any of the above standards, the property owner would be subject to code enforcement, court review, and possible fines until they were brought back into compliance. Landsca inqand Screenin - Cha ter 18.745: .Ttreet trees: Section 18.745.040 states t a all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.C Section 18.745.040.C requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The applicant is proposing to plant "red maple" street trees along SW Grant Street, and SW McKenzie at 30 feet on center. The "red maple" is an approved street tree and is considered large. The proposed spacing is adequate. The applicant has indicated that the trees will be two-inch caliper trees. This criterion is satisfied. and I Ica Riiffnrinn and Ri-m aninn- Buffering and Screening is required between different types of land uses. It is the intent of these standards to provide for privacy and protection and reduce or eliminate the adverse impacts of visual or noise pollution that a development site may impose on adjacent properties. The applicant has requested an adjustment to the buffering and screening requirements which has been discussed previously in this report. Mixed Solid Waste and Reyclables Storacie - Chapter 18.755: Zhapter fTM requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING PAGE 12 OF 20 CUP2004-00002NAR2004-00014-00017 5/10/2004 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 0 • The applicant is proposing to utilize the existing facility on the church campus. Since the proposed facility and operation is being relocated to this property, and was considered in the needs of the overall campus at the time that the last conditional use permit was evaluated, the applicant may continue to use the existing facility. This criterion is satisfied. Off-Street Parkin and Loadinq(18.7651L bisa6 el- -Accessi a Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. According to the Oregon Uniform Building Code, a parking facility accommodating 201-300 spaces requires 7 ADA accessible spaces. The 201-300 spaces is based on the needs of the entire campus. In the last application, the church only had accommodations for six spaces. The applicant is proposing to add an additional ADA space to this project. The addition of this ADA space will bring the site into compliance by providing a total of seven ADA compliant spaces. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of reqquired bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. The TDC requires 2 parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet within the main assembly area. The applicant has indicated that they would be willing to provide two spaces if required. This criterion is satisfied. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.1-11 states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. The TDC requires that the campus provide 233 parking spaces on site for a seating capacity of 700 within the main sanctuary. Social/philanthropic uses require a minimum of 10 spaces per 1,000 square feet of main assembly area. This would mean that the proposed distribution center will require ten parking spaces. The TDC section 18.765.030c) allows owners of two or more uses to share parking as long as the largest use is accommodated, that there is legal, evidence that would allow sharing, and that if the agreement is terminated, the minimum parking requirements for the individual uses as identified in Chapter 18.765 will be adhered to. As discussed previously in this report, the use is a current function of the church campus. The only reason that this was not reviewed through a minor modification is because the church failed to identify this activity and parcel within the last review. The church owns the parking lot, and the use by its nature operates only during the week. The existing parking area is sufficient to support both uses. Off-street loading requirements: Off-street loading spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The proposed facility is 1,000 square feet in size, and not subject to this standard. The previous review of the facility accounted for two off-street loading spaces. This standard is satisfied. ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING PAGE 13 OF 20 CUP2004-00002NAR2004-00014-00017 5/10/2004 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER r • Tree Removal - Chapter 18.790 Section 18.790.030 requires tFa- t a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist be provided for a conditional use application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, identification of which trees are proposed to be removed, and a protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. There are no trees on this particular property, however, the adjoining property to the south has a line of trees that could potentially be impacted by development. Therefore, the church will be required to provide a tree protection plan to ensure that the health of the trees adjacent to the site is not compromised during the course of construction. FINDING: There are no trees on this particular site; however, there is a stand of trees on the adjoining property to the south within 12 feet of the proposed building. In order to insure the viability of the existing trees and those trees within the area of work, the following conditions shall apply. CONDITIONS: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the City Arborist with a tree protection plan, and a construction sequence including installation and removal of tree protection devices, clearing, grading, and paving. The applicant shall notify the City Arborist when tree protection measures are in place so that he may verify that the measures will function properly prior to construction. Visual Clearance Areas - Chapter 18.795: Section . states that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Section 18.795.030.6. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measure from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. There are no proposed structures inside of the vision clearance area, and the applicant has stated in the narrative, that no obstructions will be placed in the visual clearance areas. This standard is satisfied. C. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.360.090 rTR2)_ffirough 18.360.090(A)(15) provides adaitionaiuite Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations';); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Priva'e Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain) and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING PAGE 14 OF 20 CUP2004-00002/VAR2004-00014-00017 5/10/2004 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • The following sections were discussed previously in this report and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.13 (Parking); 18.360.090.12 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.13 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (provision for the Disabled); 18.360.090.15 (Provisions of the underlying zone). Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title including Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Standards: As discussed in this report, all applicable sections have been addressed and where the proposal is deficient, staff has recommended conditions to ensure compliance. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees: topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between ad'oining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. As discussed previously in this report, there are not any trees on this site. The site has already been developed to the point that there are no extraordinary physical or natural restraints that would dictate the placement of the proposed building. No buildings or structures are proposed that will hinder air circulation, or prevent fire-fighting apparatus from performing their jobs. This criterion has been met. Buffering, screening, and compatibility between adjoining uses: Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses and decreased noise levels, air pollution, visual barrier, on site screening of service areas, storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be considered in determining the intensity of the buffer or screen. Buffering and screening has been discussed previously in this report. This criterion is satisfied. Crime Prevention and Safety: Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangBrous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this project and has not indicated concern or objection with the proposal. The applicant is proposing to use existing site lighting. This criterion is satisfied. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING PAGE 15 OF 20 CUP2004-00002NAR2004-00014-00017 5/10/2004 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • There are no transit stops on this site, however, the applicant is working with Tri-Met on the adjoining site to improve transit facilities. This criterion is satisfied. D. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS - CHAPTER 18.810 Chapter TS-M provides construction stan ar s or the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as TDCrtion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a neighborhood route street to have a 54-foot right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Grant Avenue, which is classified as a Neighborhood Route on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 20 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate an additional 7 feet of ROW. The applicant's plan shows the additional ROW dedication, thereby meeting the criterion. This site also lies adjacent to SW McKenzie Street, which is classified as a Local Street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 25 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate an additional 2 feet of ROW. According to the TDC table 18.810.1, the minimum right-of-way width for local street standards varies between 54 feet and 42 feet, however, in order to drop below the requirement of 54 feet, the applicant is required to justify the lesser width by providing a traffic study from a certified professional. The applicant has applied for an adjustment to the street ROW width standard. The applicant refers to McKenzie as a "skinny" one-way street. McKenzie Street is a one-way street, but there is no current designation of "skinny" street. The applicant was told to pide traffic counts and findings to support either the Skinny Street Option or the smaller lorcaovl street standard shown in Figure 18.810.5 Local Residential Streets < 500 vehicles per day. The applicant has not provided any information to support either adjustment option; therefore staff recommends that the applicant be required to dedicate the additional 2 feet of ROW. SW Grant Avenue and SW McKenzie Street are currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should construct half-street imnmvPmPnts that meet the Neighborhood Route and Local Street standards. The applicant was told in the pre-application meeting that they must construct the improvements or request that they be allowed to enter into an agreement for future street improvements. The applicant's plans do not show the street improvements and they did not request that they be allowed to enter into an agreement for future street improvements. Instead, the applicant referred to the final order of a different project, Phase 113 St. Anthony's SchooVChurch Redevelopment that requires improvements to the other side of McKenzie Street with Phase 113. The final order does not address the improvements that are required as part of this application. TDC Section 18.810.030 indicates that no development shall occur unless the streets adjacent to the development meet the standards of the Chapter as provided in Tabe 18.810.1. There are provisions within the chapter that allow for future improvement guarantees in lieu of improvements when certain conditions exist. The criterion varies, but the applicant did not address the criterion. Staff recommends that the applicant either construct the half-street improvements or enter into an agreement for future street improvements. ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING PAGE 16 OF 20 CUP2004-00002NAR2004-00014-00017 5/10/2004 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 0 • Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. There are existing sidewalks along the frontages of McKenzie Street and Grant Avenue, but they do not comply with the current design standards. Staff recommends that the sidewalks be replaced with planter strips and sidewalks that meet the standards or that they enter into an agreement for future street improvements. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.C states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant's plan shows that they will construct a sewer lateral to serve the proposed storage building. A PFI will be required for the connection of the lateral to the public sewer main. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states regwires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.C states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, wgether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no existing upstream drainage areas that affect this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant has indicated that there will be a 742 square feet decrease in impervious surface area, therefore on-site detention is not required. ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING PAGE 17 OF 20 CUP2004-00002NAR2004-00014-00017 5/10/2004 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 0 • Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikewa plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. None of the abutting streets are designated as bicycle facilities. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.C states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the develop ment and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in- lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Grant Avenue and along McKenzie Street. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 193.75 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $6781.25. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STARURM: Public Water System: The appocant's plan indicates that they will be requesting a water service for the storage building. A PFI permit will be required, as well as the City Water Department fees. Storm Water Quality The Cy has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING PAGE 18 OF 20 CUP2004-00002NAR2004-00014-00017 5/10/2004 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 0 • An on-site water quality facility is required when the net, new impervious surface area exceeds 1000 square feet. This project decreases the amount of impervious surface area, therefore an on-site facility is not required. Gradin and Erosion Control: CWS Design andFConstruct on Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, radin excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per RS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The applicant is required to obtain a Site Permit from the Building Division to cover all on-site private utility installations (water, sewer, storm, etc.) and driveway construction. Address A~sssi~~~nnments: The uty of Tigard is responsible for assi ningg addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary~USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $50.00 per address shall be assessed. This The shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of building permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $50.00 (1 lots and/or tracts X $50/address = $50.00). E. IMPACT STUDY: motion a states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. The applicant has submitted an impact study addressing the required elements above. ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development. Presently, the TIF for the entire project is estimated at $636.84. These numbers increase by 6% annually. According to the Washington County TIF ordinance, 32 percent of a projects impact is met by its TIF assessment in Tigard. This leaves 68% unmitigated. The actual cost of system improvements per trip generated by new development on the transportation system can be determined by the following equation Larson, Mackenzie Engineering, Dolan Findings, June 1995): $636.84 divided by.32 equals $1,990.12. 84 ($6y 6, 2003)heTIF assessment according to the Washington County TIF ordinance effective Jul 1 Less mitigated costs The applicant is required to dedicate additional right-of-way along SW Grant, and SW McKenzie Street. At a cost of three dollars a square foot and a total of 1,031 square feet of right-of-way (644 square feet along SW Grant and 387.5 square feet along SW McKenzie), the estimated value of the dedication is $3,094.5. ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING PAGE 19 OF 20 CUP2004-00002/VAR2004-00014-00017 5/10/2004 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • Estimate of Unmitiaated Impacts Fufnmpact $1,990.12 Less TIF Assessment $ 636.84 Less Mitiaated Costs 3.094.50 Estimate of Unmitigated Impacts t-1,741.22 FINDING: Using the above cost factors, it can be determined that the applicant has accounted for more than 100% of the unmitigated impacts of the development. All other associated improvements are required of all new development within the City of Tigard, or development cannot be permitted. SECTION VIII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and stated that 1-hour rated walls are required for south and west facing sides of the storage building. The applicant should coordinate with the Building Division prior to construction. The City of Tigard Engineering Department was sent this proposal for review and the comments have been incorporated into this report. The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager has reviewed this application and has indicated that all utility work should be coordinated with the City. The division needs to know the final locations of all proposed utilities in relation to the required improvements. City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and offered no comments or objections. SECTION IX. AGENCY COMMENTS TVF&R, Clean Water Services, PGE, and ODOT were given the opportunity to review this proposal and submitted no comments or objections. Z"~ PREPARED BY: Brad Kilby Associate Planner APPROVED BY: Richard~e (ersdorff Plannin Manager ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING PAGE 20 OF 20 5/10/2004 PUBLIC HEARING Mav 3. 2004 DATE Mav 3. 2004 DATE CUP2004-00002/VAR2004-00014-00017 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER J P ? ZU JOH 9 Q GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM VICINITY MM!" CUP2004-00002 VAR2004-00014 VAR2004-00015 VAR2004-00016 VAR2004-00017 ST. ANTHONY'S PARISH STORAGE BUILDING FOP, ST. VINCENT DE PAUL A - .e > Q/ ~ FONi7~5 .D i{ 3 / ._''~v711 A lip 4EE~B..M>~ Tigard Area Map A N 0 100 200 300 400 Feet _ 7AN /~c, community Development y- < 1'= 310 feet City of Tigard formation on this map is for general location only and In should be verified with the Development Services Division- 3125 SW 1 Hag Blvd Tigard. , OR 97223 (503) 6394171 http:/A~v.ci.tigard.or.us Plot date: Mar 9, 2004; C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR doom ,0.+ wo ■ own Q-/ f w ~w M 7 / 4~ U "7 D of ~IcaR . _ N CITY SATE POW CIfY Of TpARD M not to s_ca= _ l 16 & 17 A 42004-00014 1 8U1 j.pING cVp2004-00002N pRISH ST~RpGE ST. pNTH0NY S P Now WON 0 • • City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Attn: Brad Kilby, Associate Planner Re: St. Anthony's Parish Storage Building for St. Vincent de Paul Society 1. Application for Major Modification of existing conditional use. 2. Adjustments to Set Backs, Landscaping, Screening, and Buffering, and Row Dedication Requirements. 3. Attachments Dear Brad: Per Development Code Chapter 18,330, the attached material is in application for a major modification of approved existing conditional use of Phase I of St. Anthony's School and Church Phased Expansion. Phase IA, was constructed in 2003, including a remodel and small addition to the existing middle school, a new gymnasium building, and associated site work, including partial mitigation of tree removal outside the area of work. This project is to relocate a small storage facility to accommodate the existing Food-For-The- Needy program on a lot that is currently used for parking only. Phase 1 B, to be constructed in the near future, will include: a new community center and site development as necessary to accommodate the community center, improve existing on-site vehicle and pedestrian circulation, and further mitigation of tree removal, street improvements and parking outside the area of work. We understand that as a condition of approval by the City of Tigard, we will be required to submit detailed information for administrative review prior to permitting Phase 1 B. Proposed changes that may constitute a major modification are: A change in use from parking to parking and a small storage facility. 18.330 The site is 21018 sf. There will be no additional impacts that are not currently accommodated. The Public Facilities have adequate capacity for this use. The specific applications in 18.330.05 do not apply. Supplementary requirements of other chapters will be addressed. We request a reduction in specified setback, landscaping, screening and buffering and R.O.W. dedication requirements. 18.390 DESIGN REVIEW NARRATIVE. A Pre-Application Meeting was held January 8, 2004. See attached reports. The Neighborhood Meeting was held on February 11, 2003 at 9905 SW McKenzie Street. See attached Affidavit of Mailing/Posting Neighborhood Meeting Notice; letter to neighbors within 500ft.; and meeting notes. 18.390.040 Impact study Note that this project is relocation of an existing activity currently on the Parish Campus. Kittleson & Associates Transportation Planning/Traffic Engineers observed that the proposed development is generally intended to improve facilities for existina activities, rather than increase attendance or event capacity. The effect upon traffic would therefore be negligible. By extension this is true for other public facilities and services, including bicycle traffic, the parks system, and the sanitary sewer system. This activity schedules 1 client at a time to collect donations about 15 minutes apart on weekdays. The critical traffic and parking demands occur on Sunday. The Storage Building is a shared activity with no impact on critical Sunday traffic or parking. No noise impact is anticipated due to the nature of the existing facility or the proposed location and orientation of the new building. We are reducing the impervious area on this lot; therefore no additional detention is required. Since this is a relocation of an existing activity on the Parish Campus, we would like to question why a Traffic Impact Fee (see enclosed) is required for a non-profit operation, which benefits the City of Tigard, as much as St. Anthony Parish. 18.510 Residential Zoning District This tax lot is in the R12 Zone. This Conditional Use Application addresses all requirements and requests minor adjustments to the R-12 Zone requirements. 18.705 Accesses and Circulation The project site has two accesses, one on SW McKenzie St., a one-way street, and one on SE Grant Avenue, a two way street. Current access to this activity is off the south side of MacKenzie. New access will be off the north side of McKenzie. The project should generate no significant change to existing circulation patterns. See Technical Memo by Kettleson & Associates Inc. for Phase 1 A. Public Transit There is a bus route on SW Grant Avenue. The area of work does not extend to SW Pacific Hwy. and the public transit there: This will be addressed in a future phase of construction. • 0 0 Walkway Requirements A pedestrian walkway between the new building and McKenzie Street is indicated in the enclosed Site Plan. 18.725 Environmental Performance The proposed activity will generate no noise, emissions into the air or ground, vibrations, odors or heat and glare. The site and stored materials will be maintained to control insects and rodents. The site is essentially flat. This building will be built at grade with minimum disturbance. No trees will be removed as a result of construction. 18.370 Adjustments We request 4 adjustments 1. Setback Adjustment: The Pre-App Report stated that there is a 15 ft rear yard setback and a 5 ft side yard setback. We are requesting a 20% reduction to the rear yard setback. This is already a well-landscaped area, with a 4' high wood fence on the adjacent property. The 3' reduction will have no negative impact on the adjacent property. In fact, the adjacent property owner has volunteered that they like the storage building location because it shields them from the parking lot. a. The 3' reduction is the least required to preserve 1 additional parking space and satisfy the minimum parking requirements. (See 18,765 Parking Section in this Narrative.) b. No applicable trees exist on this lot at this time. This project will increase landscape area and add landscape materials. c. The 3' setback reduction will "free-up" more space in the parking lot for emergency vehicle access from drive-ways on McKenzie Street and Grant Avenue. d. There is no reasonable alternative to the 3' reduction, which is essential to provide 1 additional parking space and maintain minimum parking requirements. 2. Landscape Adjustment: Pre-App notes require 20% of the site area be landscaped. There is no statement in 18,745, 18,765 or 18,705 about 20% landscaping. What is the authority for 20%? Most local jurisdictions require 15% of site area be landscaped. We have added 742 sf landscaping to achieve 15% of site area. The lot has landscaped areas on all 4 sides with established shrubs. We request this be approved because this project will have no negative impact on adjacent properties. See adjustment #1 above. a. 15% landscaping is the most we can provide and maintain minimum parking requirements for the entire campus. b. There are no applicable trees on the lot at this time. As agreed to in a recent meeting between Fr Les Selig and the staff, street trees can be added with this project. c. Reduced landscape areas will actually provide better emergency vehicle access. d. We have added as much landscaping as possible, but there is no other alternative to maintaining the minimum parking requirements for the entire campus. • 0 0 3. Buffer Adjustment: Statement was made by staff during the Pre-App that buffering and screening would not be required if the lot has had less than 50 parking spaces. We have 46 spaces. If that statement was not correct, please consider the following alternative proposal per 18,745.050,A,3: 1. We have a ±5' wide landscaped area at the south property line with a well- established 5' high arborvitae hedge. The voids in this hedge will be filled in so the screen is continuous. We have a ± 12' wide landscaped area at the east property line with established Juniper. There is a wood fence and large fir grove on the adjacent property, (see photos). Note that the existing stand of fir trees on the adjacent property line already provides an effective buffer. These trees also take all of the moisture, block the sunshine and light, and the fir droppings, make the soil unsuitable for other plant materials. Since this buffer is effective, it is unrealistic to try to do more with it. 2. No buildings intrude into the existing buffer area. There is a minor parking area intrusion at the south property line. Correcting this would make us seriously deficient in minimum parking requirements. 3. The existing 5' high arborvitae hedge at the south property line, which will be filled in, will be the most effective buffer. See item 1 above regarding the east property line. A duplicate fence seems redundant, and a 6' fence would require "limbing-up" the fir trees with potential damage to an effective buffer. As stated before, the neighbor has no problem with this buffering. 4. The enhanced arborvitae hedge at the south property line provides the most effective buffer. An acceptable buffer already exists at the east property line. As noted in item 1 above, no additional trees, shrubs or ground cover will survive under the existing fir grove. 5. As stated before, the arborvitae hedge at the south property line is a most effective buffer, as in the existing fir grove and fence at the east property line. Anything more would be useless overkill. The ordinance requirements do not address this specific situation. The lot functions well now with no problems, and will continue to do so with the new building. While we were told at the Pre-App Meeting that buffering would not be required with less than 50 parking spaces, we believe this proposal meets the intent, if not the letter of the buffering requirements. There is no other alternative to satisfying the conflicting demands of minimum parking, landscaping and buffering requirements. 4. Street width adjustment: The Pre-App notes requested dedication for a 27' from centerline R.O.W. on SW McKenzie Street. In Phase IA last year the R.O.W. requirement of the other side of SW McKenzie was 25'. We must question the change from centerline - one side to the other, and request a 25' R.O.W. SW McKenzie is a "skinny' one-way street, and will remain so. After a recent meeting between staff and Fr Selig, we understand that, if traffic count does not exceed 1000 V.P.D., no additional dedication will be required. A traffic count will be performed in early April. Following that Kittleson & Associates Inc. will provide an evaluation - if required. • 0 0 See also enclosed pages of Kittleson & Associates Inc. Technical Memorandum for Phase 1 A. This includes comments that McKenzie Street was fully improved per ordinance requirements prior to Phase 1 A. Also see Final Order of Hearings Officer for Phase 1 A which indicates that street improvements will be provided as a part of Phase 1 B. There are no adverse impacts on wetlands, slopes, or mature trees. Based on all available information this project should have no adverse impacts on existing SW McKenzie Street. 18.745 Buffering and Screening The property south and east of the area of work is multi-family. There is a 6'/2' to 7'/2' planted buffer with a wood fence to the east, and a 4' to 5' buffer with an Arborvitae hedge to the south. We propose to keep these, See adjustments. We were told during the pre-app that buffering and screening would not be required if less than 50 parking spaces. We have 46 spaces. 18.745 & 18.765 Landscaping Pre-app stated that 20% of site area should be landscaped. This in not stated in Chapter 18.745. We have added 742 sf to the existing landscape area making total landscape area 15% of the site. The new landscaping will be sympathetic and continue the vocabulary of the existing campus. (See adjustments) As conditioned in the final order by the Hearings Officer for Phase 1 A, we propose to complete required street trees on the south side of SW McKenzie Street in Phase 1 B. See enclosed final order by hearings officer for Phase 1 A. 17.755 Recycling This use is merely being relocated within the Parish Campus. The will be no additional demand. The existing location for trash and recycling (±160sf) was constructed last year in Phase 1 A, and is accepted by Pride Disposal. See enclosed letter from Pride Disposal. 18.765 Parking Pre App required 10 parking spaces for this activity. This seems extreme for a 1000sf storage facility, however, as stated before this is a shared use on weekdays only with 1 client at a time. As approved in Phase 1A. The largest parking requirement for St.. Anthony's in all phases of planned development is the sanctuary. At a rate of one space per three seats, the existing 700- seat sanctuary requires 233 spaces. There are presently 249 spaces. 6 spaces will be deleted by this project, but we will still have 10 more than the sanctuary requires - meeting the Pre-App requirement for this storage building. 18.765.030C would also apply. We prefer not to remove parking or add street trees at this portion of SW McKenzie Street in Phase 1 because we will be required to add parking elsewhere on campus in a future phase when the sanctuary is enlarged, and street trees may have to be resolved at that time to respond to requirements in the right-of-way for the enlarged sanctuary. We proposed instead to • 0 0 postpone completing half-street improvements at this location until the adjacent buildings are remodeled or demolished and replaced in a future phase. A pedestrian path to the R.O.W. sidewalk is indicated thru the parking area. Existing site layout, accesses, lighting and drainage meet code requirements. Loading area requirements were indicated as not applicable in the Pre-App. Bicycle racks The Pre-app related bike parking to "multifamily, commercial or industrial:" uses. Our use in not one of these, and we doubt people will ride a bike to collect a food box. We can provide 2 bike spaces, if required. 100-year Flood Plain According to the FEMA Flood Insurance Map, the project site is outside the 100-year flood plain. httr0mao1. msc.fema.awfidms/lntraView.cai? KEY=97780238&ifit=1 Cleanwater Services (CWS) Buffer Standards See enclosed response from Cleanwater Services indicating that sensitive areas do no exist on- site or within 200' from the project. 18.780 Signs Perhaps a small identity sign will be mounted on the building wall and we may use ODOT compliant directional signs (e.g." ONE WAY - DO NOT ENTER"). We understand that exterior signage is permitted separately. If exterior signage is added to the project, we will contact the planner at the City of Tigard for review prior to permitting. 18.790 Tree Removal Requirements The Pre-app required an arborist report. However, there are no qualifying trees on this lot, and nothing to mitigate. Existing juniper and arborvitae shrubs will be preserved and enhanced. 18.795 Clear Vision Area The clear vision area would maintain the City's requirements at the existing road/driveway connection. 18.810 Street and Utility Standards Pre-App requested 27' row dedication on SW McKenzie and SW Grant Streets. Note that the Phase 1A dedication requirement on McKenzie was 25'. What is the purpose of taking the additional 2', and complicating the street centerline location? See adjustments. Pre-app notes stated that we could request deferring street improvements until a future Phase, and the final order by the Hearings Officer for Phase 1 A conditions that required street improvements on south side of McKenzie Street be done in Phase 1 B. See enclosed Final Order by Hearings Officer. Current electric service is overhead to an existing light pole in McKenzie Street. The PGE representative says the new building can be served from this service. See enclosed letter from PGE. Drainage We are reducing the impervious area on this lot by 742sf. Since there is no increase in impervious surface area, a water quality facility is not required. The existing catch basin and storm drainage will remain adequate for this lot. Sanitary Sanitary connection will be made to Grant Avenue per City requirements with a PFI permit. Water Water connection will be made to McKenzie Street per City requirements with a PFI permit. Provisions For The disabled Site development will include accessible sidewalk connection from SW McKenzie to the new building. One accessible parking space and landing pad is indicated. Entry to the building will have an accessible ramp, door, and hardware. The new toilet room will be accessible. Crime Prevention and Safety The site is well lit by 2 existing light poles. The new building will have wall-mounted exterior lighting. Normal building security will be maintained. Demarcation of Public, Semi-public, and Private Spaces for Crime Prevention This activity is appropriately separated from the school and church function of the campus. The new and existing buildings to remain will be clustered as part of larger master plan to define a coherent campus. The educational buildings including the gym will be oriented inward, the religious buildings outward. This formal relationship is intended to establish a friendly relationship with the surrounding community and at the same time contain the school children within a secure, private educational environment. 0 0 0 ATTACHMENTS 8 1/z" X 11 Neighborhood meeting materials, including: • Affidavit of Mailing/Posting Neighborhood Meeting Notice • Letter to neighbors within 500 ft. inviting them to attend the neighborhood meeting • Attendance sheet (not included because no neighbors attended meeting) • Meeting notes 2. Traffic Impact Fee Worksheet 3. Kittleson & Associates Inc. Technical Memo 4. Letter from Pride Disposal 5. Letter from Cleanwater Services 6. PGE Service Proposal 7. Page 6 & 7 of Final Order by Hearings Officer for Phase 1A, and Pages 2 & 27 of Staff Report for Phase 1 A. 8. Pre-App Conference Notes. 24" x 36" Drawings 1. Survey 2. Existing Campus Plan 3. Site Plan with Utilities 4. Grading Plan 5. Landscape Plan 6. Floor Plan 7. Exterior Elevations Minutes of Neighborhood Meeting Re: Storage Building for St. Vincent de Paul Society St. Anthony Parish, Tigard, Oregon February 11, 2004 Met at 7:25 pm In attendance: 5 Staff members, Fr LesSelig, Bob Klas. Convened meeting at 7:35 pm. No neighbors within 500' were in attendance. Presented "Frequently asked questions" handouts. Discussed Proposal and Design with those Present. Adjourned meeting at 7:50 pm. 0 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE \ OREGON The following notice shall he read to. attendees at the beginning of a neighborhoodmeeting. This meeting is regarding (proiect name) located at ( proiect location) t~~~ and is being held as required by the City Of Tigard development review process. The purpose of this meeting is to inform neighbors of the project as currently planned. This meeting is not a decision forum and is not to approve or disapprove the project in whole or in part. It is to share information regarding the project and to solicit constructive input from neighbors and affected property owners. Application for the project being discussed here has not yet been submitted to the City. Therefore, the,project will be at various stages of planning and some details may not be available at this time. Property owners of record within 500 ft. should have received a list of frequently asked questions along with the notice of this meeting. This meeting is not attended by City staff in order to encourage dialog between the developer and affected neighbors. Your comments and questions will be taken down and submitted with the application for consideration by, the City planning staff. Property owners within 500 ft will be notified after a complete application-is submitted. They will be provided an opportunity to comment. Any .appeals are decided based on the provisions of applicable laws and the development code. For questions regarding the development review process, please contact the City of Tigard Planning Department. For project details, you will need to contact the developer. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 HHCHBORHOOD TI QUESTIONS ShapCommunity (Devement ing ABe ter Community What Is The Purpose Of This Neighborhood Meeting? The purpose of the meeting is to allow the prospective developer to share with you what they are planning to do. This is your opportunity to become informed of. their proposed development and to, let them know what issues or concerns you have in regard to their proposal. What Happens After The Neighborhood Meeting? After the neighborhood meeting, the prospective developer finalizes their submittal package (often taking into account citizen concerns) -and submits an application to the City. Sometimes it takes a while before the developer's application is ready to submit, so there could be several months between the neighborhood meeting and the submittal of an application. Once an application is submitted to the City, Staff reviews it for completeness. Once an application has been deemed complete, the formal application review begins. It takes approximately 6-8 weeks from the time the application is accepted for a decision to be made. Many types of applications require a public hearing at which citizens are given the opportunity to provide comments or concerns. For all types of applications, property owners within 500 feet of the subject.parcels receive notice of the public hearing (if applicable), notice of the decision, and are given the opportunity to appeal the decision. What If The Proposal Presented At The Neighborhood Meeting Is Not What Is Actually Submitted? Applicants are not required to submit exactly what was presented at the neighborhood meeting if it generally follows the type of development proposed. This provides for the opportunity to address the neighborhood issues and address other changes necessitated by the development or staff. If the project is entirely different, a new neighborhood meeting would be required.. In any case; notice of decision is sent to property owners within 500 feet of the proposed development allowing them the opportunity to appeal. How.DO I Know What Issues Are Valid? A decision is reviewed based on compliance with the Tigard Development Code. Review the development code to. familiarize yourself with what is permitted and what may not be Permitted. A copy of the development code is available for viewing at the Tigard City Library or a copy may be purchased at the Community Development Services counter. You may also contact City Planning staff and ask what the standards are for a specific issue. Be prepared, however, that you may not LIKE all the standards, but at least you, know what they are. If a development meets the code standards, it can proceed. i:lcurp1nlju1ialc1tinfo2.doc The following is a list of questions developed by a subgroup of the Citizen Involvement Team. These questions are intended to aid you in formulating your own questions for proposed development in your area. Feel free to ask more or alter the questions to address your own unique concerns and interests. PROCESS e What applications are you (the developer) applying for? When. do you expect to submit the application(s) so that neighbors can review it? What changes or additions are expected prior to submittal? ® Will the decision on the application be made by City Staff, Hearings Officer, Planning Commission or City Council? How long is the process? (timing)/ e At what point in the process are citizens given notice and the opportunity to provide input? ® Has a pre-application conference been held with City of Tigard Staff? ✓ Have any preliminary requirements been addressed or have any critical issues been identified? ✓ What City Planner did you speak with regarding this project? (This person is generally the Planner. assigned to the land use case and. he one to contact for additional information). STREETS © Will there be a traffic study done? What are the preliminary traffic impacts anticipated as a result of the development and how do you propose to mitigate the impacts if necessary? o What street improvements (including sidewalks) are proposed? What connections to existing streets are proposed? o Are streets proposed to be public or private? What are the proposed street and sidewalk widths? o What are the emergency access requirements and what is proposed to meet those requirements? ZONING AND DENSITY © What is the current zoning? What uses are'allowed under this zoning? o Will there be a re-zone requested -by the developer? if yes, to what zone? o How many units are proposed for the development and what is the minimum and maximum density allowed in the zone? DRAINAGE AND WATER OUALITY ® What is your erosion control and drainage plan the grading plans? What is the natural slope of the property? What are o Is there a water quality facility planned within the development and where will it be located? Who will own and maintain the facility? TREES AND LANDSCAPING ® What are. the tree removal plans and what is proposed to mitigate for trees removed? o What are the landscaping plans? What buffering or fencing is required and/or proposed? MAILING: I, Ica t!5r=- e-r <-L..ft s , being duly sworn, depose and say that on the 2Co day of 20 04-. 1 caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) 1 2 Q " . S W C0 of.W-r a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at -T-, c~.® z zb C~+ 1 , with postage prepaid thereon. Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) PDST~MG: do affirm that I erg (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) 1 2'30 S \\r <~z a~AN T , and did on the 2co day of ,•~►-ts-I~a y , 2004- _ personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed fora C~ tarn-f mss application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at ( 2C---_SU S \Y- <ae_A .-r'.. CZw lPf-"7' 5ZI-;Z~ ^I-ab Or-1 ryl roc cc~f-L2re_~ (state location you posted notice on property) Signature (In the presence of a Notary. Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF County of (9`t 4t~ ~v~ D ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of '«AAA_ CLA-A-U , 20V`7 . OFFICIAL SEAL CHRISTINE SHERWOOD NOTARY PUBLIC -OREGON I COMMISSION NO. 360557 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUGUST 21, 200E Applicant, please complete the information below: NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Address or General Location of Subject Property: Subject Property Tax Map(s) and Lot #(s): I _J NOTARY PUBLIC OF-OREGON My Commission Expires: 4At&6d2I~ 2006 v h:\login\pattMasters\affidavit of mailing-posting neighborhood meetina.doc AOFIOAVIT .(DF MAILING/POSTING NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE • r i 27 January 2004 Property Owner or Resident RE: Storage Building for St. Vincent De Paul Society Dear Interested Party; St. Anthony Parish is the owner of the property located at 12630 SW Grant Avenue 2 S 10 2 BD 00800. We are considering proposing a conditional use for a 1000 sf storage building at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 Parish Offices 9905 SW MacKenzie Street Tigard, Oregon 7:30 pm Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 503-590-7160 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Robert R. Klas C Architect • 3 )9 $ IB9 19 SW MCKENZ6E S1FEET • v AY ~-NCONC~CURB wC O jR1/ O ~ j!-® O NEW L5. ~ ~ Y .a.i. -.}.u.y~~ 1F~,1 iii I ','~.j (C) L9. ~ mwa °~.n me ~ xw.m ~cr aw..~ mi NEW L5. S ,7 FC, P1 O _~P r' p NEW CONC. CURB TO MATCH E%ISM C f ~y N EW PNNIEU : 4 SMIPES- 'i'• , p b NEPAW As aFnb. a Y..~ w Vy I n 0._O. (E) CONC. CUR85 TP. (U.N.O.) 9'-O'b lh O" t • ~ ~ ,+.STP~,• ~gEPNN Q cr % U'1 URBS UPr ~ taut. caes m (E) L_. PP { ® JOb NOI Z0 QaSW 1-71-IOW SME DATA Dewm Irt 1 BbWCkodi RRN SITE AREA: 21,750 S.F. (0.50 ACRE) shed Tula i BUILDING AREA: 1,000 S.F. 814 PLAN LANDSCAPE AREA: 3,200 S.F. PARKING NO.: REGULAR= 32 COMPACT= 14 " above Mwebw TOTAL= 46 SPACES D°1 SEE MAP 2S 12CO • s SE 1/4 NWI/4 SECTION 2 T2S R I W W.M. 2S 1 2 BD ry WASHINGTON COUNTY OFCGON SCALE 1"+100' (V 100 P J 6.011. SEE MAP 2S 120A mne0.no m. 47 s~N SEE MAP r J~ ,y 2S 1 288j SA b s[, 48 , N ORTH r/° RFFr 46 14, 52 i8 1 r SEE MAP Sk, , 49, ~..m1 J'ro \ 25 1 26C i.p.} ~.A., t { l s o d JsAARDVJLL1r 8- 51 / ,l). C:1 l f y11 l J 400 / 50 / .4; _ e / A 0 01 f 1 yBol +A . . 901 900 'r4 d Too 4,. q••e3. f. r. , IP ..1/Ae, j S fv Goo • / 1001 Zi4 '••e ~'r • , lPle. ~L Iq, ryti B04 '•J , , ~P' 2- 1r SEE MAP 5 s YO 24 12AC rJ .2300 AMENDED 1300 a~ NDRTH 100 rlAq a ° 1 J lino A r 2201 , + a aO \ r 1,60A, r lia~c / 100! ,a J + a s H. 1111,1 '.2200 \ 1 cs W. 111Y 1 9,. • T P FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES T1C,ARDV1LL 2100 L' ; D° NOT RELY ON FOR ANY ou4 + _ ~~~jjj 1701 39 C5w 91 1% r IIAe, b OTHER USE. 8200[0.• 'R;rYV1N~'' Iro .a e as H.uxs1 f Ip \ S+ 1RY ~ , d,r I~Oz 1[.$.111111 / ^ 7~ dt ,1p. ,ib• rP.r. DC1T1t7N . ~ .r CHARD ,a•r • \ ~ O 1601 Y` 37 \ 7 A ~Tt:\YY1 C r J~ b z7o° e , 2800 rs,< 2900 36 Jr A. 3000 rlAr. 31°0 su[. 35 SEE MAP 251 2C5 Iaa0 'i !J[ r \ F \ o ~ k , /.701301 Y'~151 JN SEE MAP 2S 12CA T16ARD 2S 1 2 BD JAN-13-2004 02:28PM FROM- • • T-145 P.001/001 F-005 • C TY OF TGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION envcwnomo 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD community (Betur Community TIGARD, -OREGON 91223 PHONE: 503-6394171 FAX 503.604.7297 (Attn: P1tty or Shirley/Planning Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. ISI34AB, Tax lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW and INCLUDE A MAP OF ALL LOTS FOR THE PROJECT (preferably assessor's tax map): INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTING 2 OR 3 SETS OF LABELS: 3 (NOTE: A minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided to place on your 2 sets of envelopes that applicants are required to submit at the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood meeting is required and you have not yet held that meeting, you should request 3 sets) NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: t✓r-~-a~ PHONE: 50S G4-4 - Z-This request may be mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request in "Will Call" by their last name, at the Community Development. Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cot Description $11 to generate the mailing list, plus $2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels (20 addresses per sheet). Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. * EXAMPLE * J_ sheets of labels x $2/sheet = HE x -2- sets = $16.00 _L sheets of labels x $2/sheet for (IT area x I- sets = $ 4.00 GENERATE LIST = 00 TOTAL = $31.00 * * COST FOR THIS REQUEST sheet(s) of labels x $2/sheet = S y x 4 sets C= sheet(s) of labels x $2/sheet for CIT area = $ GENERATE LIST - $ILE 1 ~jM TOTAL = 0 02BD-00702 2S102BD-02101 ARNOLD HOWARD TRUST C191 ET CORP 10ATON PO BOX 3871 BY W TROLEUM #225 TUALATIN, OR 97062 PTLAND,`OR 929 2 97210 2S102BB-02500 2S102BB-01302 BANKS LEE A & LISA D EISENHAUER WILLIAM D & DAWN P 10080 SW MOLLY CT 10000 SW JOHNSON ST TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S102BB-01800 2S102BB-01202 ' BEMIS THERESA FORD ROBIN L/KELLY J 12535 SW GRANT AVE 10010 SW JOHNSON ST TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S102BD-01001 2S102BC-00901 BLINE RONALD G & FRIEDRICH SHERREE R SAGUN JUDITH L 12805 SW GRANT AVE 2190 SKYLINE DR TIGARD, OR 97223 SEASIDE, OR 97138 2S102BB-01400 2S1026D-00601 BOGDEN ROBERT W AND FUNK JAMES H BARBARA J c/o BERGMANN FLOYD H 9940 SW JOHNSON STREET MARINE M TIGARD, OR 97223 11600 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 2S102BB-01802 2S102BD-00500 BONIFACIO BELLA FUNK JAMES H 12533 SW GRANT AVE c/o BERGMANN FLOYD H & MARINE M TIGARD, OR 97223 11600 SW 90TH TIGARD, OR 97223 2S102BD-02200 2S 28D-00600 BUSCHA HELMUT AND ERIKA FUN AMES 6215 SW 41ST AVE c/o BER NN FLOYD H & MARINE M PORTLAND, OR 97221 116 W9 ARD, OR 9 23 2S102BD-00901 2S102BC-D0400 COLLING CHARLES W GAVOJDEA CONSTANTIN 13835 SW HALL 12625 SW GRANT AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S102BC-00800 2S102BD-02300 COL G ARLES W HANSEN DOROTHY L. 1383 ALL c/o FINGER ROGER A & PHYLLIS SAIKI ARD, OR 23 610 NW SPRING AVE PORTLAND, OR 97229 23102BD-02000 2S102BD-01100 COMET CORPORATION HARDY GERALD T BY WSCO PETROLEUM #225 PO BOX 86276 2929 NW 29TH PORTLAND, OR 97286 PORTLAND, OR 97210 002BC-00700 2S 102BB-02200 HASSEL JOHN GEORGE LAWRENCE GREGORY S 10115 SW WALNUT 10020 SW MOLLY CT TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S102BD-00801 2S102BD-02100 HEFFERNAN PATRICK J & PATRICIA LIM KYUNG S 230 CHANDLER PL 2006 SE 11TH LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 PORTLAND, OR 97214 2S102BD-02201 2S102BB-00806 HEKIMIAN INC & RF INVESTMENTS & LINKHART RICHARD LANG RICHARD L & CHRISTINE H VERNETTA BY RANDALL CONSTRUCTION CO INC 12490 SW BROOKSIDE AVE 9500 SW BARBUR BLVD STE 300 TIGARD, OR 97223 'PORTLAND, OR 97219 2S102BD-00700 2S102BC-00300 HOHNER TERRANCE D REV LIV TRUST LORREN JOHNSON HARRISON-HOHNER JANE E 10155 SW WALNUT ST REV LIVING TRUST TIGARD, OR 97223 9830 SW MCKENZIE ST TIGARD, OR 97223 2S102BB-02300 2S1028B-02000 INTERCOASTAL DEV GROUP LLC MCCARTHY TIMOTHY PO BOX 91185 12575 SW GRANT AVE PORTLAND, OR 97291 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S102BB-02600 2S10286-0310D IN O ADEV GROUP LLC MOORE'S MEADOW HOMEOWNERS ASSOC < PO BO PO BOX 1082 P LA, 7291 CLACKAMAS, OR 97015 2S102BB-02100 2 102BB-02900 INTERCOASTAL DEVELOPMENT MO 'S M OW HOMEOWNERS ASSOC GROUP LLC PO B 0 PO BOX 91185 CKAMAS, OR 97015 PORTLAND, OR 97291 2S102BC-00600 2S. 1 0216-03000 IVERSON JAMES C & ANNA L MDOW HOMEOWNERS ASSOC 12675 SW GRANT AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 97015 2S102BC-01101 2S102BC-01100 JARVIS MICHAEL L & DIANNA C MUMM RICHARD C 10120 SW WALNUT ST PO BOX 477 TIGARD, OR 97223 ENTERPRISE, OR 97828 2S102BD-02600 2S1 02BB-01 301 KIM PENNEY MURRAY JAMES A & MOLLY 395 NW SILVERADO DR 9982 SW JOHNSON ST BEAVERTON, OR 97006 TIGARD, OR 97223 10 002BD-00905 2S102BD-00100 NATION SUSAN & RO C OLIC ARCHBISHOP OF NATION KURT PORT IN OREGON 9995-9997 SW WALNUT 283 BUR E TIGARD, OR 97223 RTLAND, OR 97214 2S102BB-02700 2S102BC-00701 NELSEN DAVIDA & HEIDI SAMUELS ROBERT C ROBIN R 10120 SW MOLLY CT 8735 SW LEHMAN ST TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND, OR 97223 2S102BB-02800 2S10286-01500 NGUYEN DUNG ANH & SIMELE PAUL E & TRAN NUONG THI KIEU NGUYEN HANH T & 10140 SW MOLLY CT PHAM MY DUNG THI TIGARD, OR 97223 12583 SW 116TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 2S102BD-00900 2S102BD-00701 NGUYEN THAN LENG SPADA FRED TRUSTEE 12660 SW GRANT AVE #1 WIENER NORMAN J TRUSTEE TIGARD, OR 97223 BY WENDY'S INTERNATIONAL INC PO BOX 256 ATTN: TAX DEPT 1514 DUBLIN, OH 43017 2S1028C-00500 2S1028C-00902 PADILLA MICHAEL WAND TAYLOR JEFF R APRIL C 12780 SW CREEKSHIRE DR 12645 SW GRANT TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S102BD-00904 2S102BD-01200 PAXMAN SUSAN & TOSCO CORPORATION NATION KURT PROPERTY TAX DEPT-DC17 6003 SW CORBETT AVE PO BOX 52085 PORTLAND, OR 97201 PHOENIX, AZ 85072 2S102BC-01102 2S102BD-01400 RESHEY MARILYN REV LIV TRUST T CO COR RATION BY MARILYN LEE RESHEY TR PRO TAX DEPT-DC17 10160 SW WALNUT ST PO 5 5 TIGARD, OR 97223 OENIX, AZ 8 72 23102BB-01700 2S102BD-01300 ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP T ATION O OF PORTLAND IN OREGON PDEPT-DC17 > < 2838 E BURNSIDE ST P PORTLAND, OR 97214 AZ072 OE NIX, P 2S102BB-01600 2S102BB-01801 ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF TUBBS WILLIAM R JR & KIMBERLY K PORTLAND IN OREGON 12531 SW GRANT AVE 2838 E BURNSIDE PORTLAND, OR 97223 PORTLAND, OR 97214 2 102BD-00800 2S102BC-01200 RO N CATHOLI ARCHBISHOP OF WALP GEORGIA J PORTL REGON 10200 SW WALNUT ST 2838 R TIGARD, OR 97223 P TLAND, OR 97214 9102BB-02400 WEESE OONA L & GROVER CHRIS P 10060 SW MOLLY CT TIGARD, OR 97223 2S10213C-07800 WOODARD CHARLES L ARLIE 10215 SW WALNUT PO BOX 23303 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S102BC-07700 W ARD CH LES L ARLIE 10215 S NUT PO B 23 T ARD, OR 97 23 2S102BC-00200 ODARD C ALES L ARLIE 1021 ALNUT AVE PO B 303 T ARD, OR 223 2S102BC-07900 Tll DARD CHA ES L ARLIE 1021 NUT PO BO 3 T RD, OR 223 2S10213C-06800 WOODARD JON N 10097 SW WOODARD LN TIGARD, OR 97223 2S102BC-06900 WOODARD MARC T & ELIZABETH M 7224 LINDA VISTA DR CITRUS HEIGHTS. CA 95610 • Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Brooks Gaston 3206 Princess Edinburg, TX 78539 Don & Dorothy Erdt 13760 SW 121 st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Martha Bishop 10590 SW Cook Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Vanessa Foster 13085 SW Howard Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Susan Beilke 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Patricia Keerins 12195 SW 121 st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 0 CITY OF TIGARD - CENTRAL CIT SUBCOMMITTEE • (i:\curpln\setup\labels\CIT Central.doc) UPDATED: 12-Jan-04 W' / ~ ( m02B00I202 iBB01382 f~ ]v~~ /O v ai~\~ : oleeBl 00.25 j 1s02e90:;9B m ee ///BB, rn02 B90T700 \ m028Ba700 j ~ mme9B»So j 261026CW900 _ A ( rnB1BCO8e00 mu;aeo: B \ j / rnB:eeoaoB ~ ~ ma2B9BB9o9 ~ m9:I V~ / ~.M07NOTEG9 m02B0004B\ 1s01ec90300 , ' ~ r m07e009309~ m9zec09609 ~jm0mca9699 I \ 'j Community Development i _ ','mOlBB0159B \ - of TIGARD SYSTEM XMM NOTIFIED j (50W) x-CITY 372osi9Bm9n \ Is19i9ooaem \ j- \ : / i T \ \ m0169a96BB j jm02B090999 l 25191 8 0 9 019 2 j ~~'BIB0006~\ y j FOR: Robert Has RE_ZS NUB, 800 Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date printed on this map. m02B008901 -~15 `\50097J0 \ n02B00B -B00. / 10280009 - 028000907 \ ~ m01111111 0 01 \ j 371020000 WI j / / 731070902700 ~ ~ / \ ' 21070001100 j, \ 2sm2e9m7o/ j ® I \ j\,\\92 6 9 912 09\j. / \ Cm92eoo2:90 ~ j ~ j r / rno:B9oz19o'~ \ is1B:e9o22m 0 100 200 300 Feet { \ j m9ieB9no1 j j 1"= 246 feet `I 351f13B002B00~ 1 \ j / City ofETigard Information on this map is for general location only and \ j / .cam \ should be verified with the Development Services Division. t j 13125 SW Hall Blvd \ Tigard. OR 97223 \ j (503 6334171 http:/Avvni.d.tipard.or.us _ Plot date: Jan 14, 2004; C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR 01/09/2004 15:21 FAX 5035981960 • COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE WORKSHEET (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) CITY OF TIGARD 0 [a 002 Date: Plans Check No. Proiect Title: Applicant: - - - - Mailing Address: Tax Map No. ' Site Address-. Land Use Cate4ant Rate Per Trip Payment Method ❑ RESIDENTIAL $ 253.00 0 CASHICHECK ❑ BUSINESS/COMMERCIAL S 64.00 ❑ CREDIT ❑ OFFICE $ 233.00 0 BANCROFT (PROMISSORY NOTE) INDUSTRIAL $ 244,00 ❑ DEFER TO OCCUPANCY ❑ INSTITUTIONAL $105.00 LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF USE WEEKDAY AVG TRIP RATE WEEKEND AVG TRIP RATE (institutional) -_57 Clout fie) n la, BASIS "(~iS T I F C 1(~,c~` i S IJ' aSecQ CALCULATIONS ` ADDITIONAL NOTES PROJECT TRIP GENERATION ROAD AMOUNT • 51 _ 1 mg-, 74 PREPARED BY TRANSIT AMOUNT (0_.A6 TOTA EE • KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES INC. TRANSPORTATION PLAN NINGITRAFFIC ENGINEERING 610 SW ALDER, SUITE 700 • PORTLAND, OR 97205 • (503) 228-5230 • FAX(503)273-8169 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM St. Anthony's School/Church Redevelopment Traffic Evaluation Date: November 12, 2002 To: Brian Rager, City of Tigard From: Judith Gray cc: Father Leslie Sieg Project 5610 St. Anthony's School and Church proposes to redevelop the existing site located on Highway 99W between SW McKenzie Street and SW Johnson Street in Tigard, Oregon. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. was asked to evaluate the traffic impacts associated with the proposed project. The redevelopment plan includes the following: Phase 1A Gymnasium: Physical education building and gymnasium with support facilities including locker rooms and PE teacher office (approximately 10,500 square feet). Middle School & Library: Remodel of existing building with slight expansion (220 square feet), including two classrooms and enlarged library and media center facilities. The expansion will increase the school capacity from 400 to 450 students. Phase 1B Community Center: Assembly building including kitchen, toilet rooms, mechanical room and storage (approximately 15,000 square feet). Site Development: Addition of approximately 33 spaces around buildings, and modifying on-site vehicle circulation by providing internal connection between SW Grant and SW Johnson Avenues, and increased on-site passenger loading area. The existing and proposed site plans are shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. FU,ENAME: H:\projfile\56101report\56]OTMEM.doc • St. Anthony's School/Church Redevelopment Project 5610 November 12, 2002 Page 2 Existing Traffic Operations The peak weekday traffic periods for St. Anthony's correspond to the beginning and end of the school day at St. Anthony's school. The school day runs from 8 a.m. through 3 p.m. each weekday, except for Wednesday, when school ends at 2 p.m. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. visited the site during a Thursday afternoon and Friday morning to observe peak period traffic operations for St. Anthony's. The majority of vehicles access St. Anthony's school and church utilizing a one-way circulation pattern. Traffic entering from Highway 99W turns northwest on SW McKenzie Avenue, which is a one-way road, turns right onto SW Grant Avenue, and turns right onto SW Johnson Avenue. Avenue. Left-turn restrictions into parking areas on SW Johnson Avenue reinforce the one-way circulation pattern. Passenger loading/unloading occurs primarily on site with some on adjacent streets, but is concentrated at parking lots accessed by SW Grant Avenue and SW Johnson. Congestion in the parking/passenger loading areas occurred during both the morning and afternoon peak periods before and after school. In both cases, vehicle queues spilled onto the adjacent streets (SW Grant and Johnson Avenues). Queues on SW Johnson Avenue extended to SW Grant Avenue and wrapped around the corner along SW Grant Avenue. Although the queues occurred during both peak periods, the duration of the congested conditions was short, lasting only 15 to 20 minutes in both cases. SW Grant Avenue has narrow lanes and vehicles are unable to pass queues without entering the opposing traffic lanes. However, background traffic in the area has an alternative route via SW Walnut Street, which has a traffic signal at the intersection with Highway 99W. SW Johnson Street is wide enough for vehicles to by-pass queues without encroaching in the opposing lane. While the queuing conditions at the parking lot entrances are not ideal, they do not represent a significant operational or safety concern because they occur at predictable times, they are of very short duration, and the signalized Highway 99W/SW Walnut Street intersection provides an alternative routes for non-school traffic. The Highway 99W/SW Johnson Street and Highway 99W/SW McKenzie Street intersections operated acceptably during both observation periods. The only delays were related to downstream traffic on Highway 99W, and not from traffic generated by the St. Anthony's site. Development Impacts The proposed development plan is generally intended to improve facilities for existing activities, rather than increase attendance or event capacity. Only the middle school remodel is expected to accommodate increased activity. Specifically, the additional two classrooms will increase enrollment capacity from 400 to 450 students. Trip Generation St. Anthony's does not provide bus or shuttle service, so the majority of students are dropped off and picked up by passenger vehicles. Currently, there are 380 students enrolled from 277 families, for an average of 1.4 children per family. According to church personnel, some families Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon • St. Anthony's School/Church Redevelopment Project 5610 November 12, 2002 Page 3 are able to carpool with each other. Therefore, presuming that the ratio remains somewhat constant, the additional 50-studerit capacity could result in approximately 30 to 35 additional vehicles dropping off/picking up children at the start and end of the school day. Intersection Operations Given the observed adequacy of intersection operations of the Highway 99W/SW Johnson Street and Highway 99W/SW McKenzie Street intersections during these periods, the increased traffic resulting from the proposed development plan will not significantly impact traffic operations. Vehicle Queuing The proposed development plan includes modifications to the internal circulation and provision of approximately 360 feet along the front of the future Community Center for passenger loading/unloading, in addition to increased drive aisles in the parking areas that could internalize peak period vehicle queues. Thus, queuing conditions will likely improve once the proposed redevelopment is complete. Summary Field observations indicate that the St. Anthony's School and Church have no significant impacts on the transportation system, with the exception of queue spillback at the parking _ lot driveways. The queuing conditions are of short duration, lasting approximately 15 to 20 minutes during the peak morning arrival and afternoon departure periods. Residents in the area have an alternative route to access Highway 99W via the signalized intersection with SW Walnut Street. Therefore, it is not a significant operational or safety concern. The proposed development plan will increase student enrollment capacity at the school, which would result in approximately 30 to 35 additional vehicles during these peak periods. This increase is not expected to significantly impact traffic operations in the vicinity. Furthermore, the modified site circulation plan, with designated passenger loading area, will likely improve the current peak period queuing conditions. Based on this evaluation, the proposed redevelopment can occur while maintaining safe and efficient operations of the surrounding transportation system. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us at 503-228-5230. Sincerely, ON & ASSOCIATES, INC. udith Planner 61, r andehey, P. . Irincipal Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Z SW JOHNSON STREET v I C EXISTING I I~ ° t EXISTING j OVERFLOW j I I CONVENT PARKING 1 EXISTING SCHOOL 1 1 ~ I I IIIIII Z 99C ~O Lli Q 4.t~OOJ~P ~ IIIIIIII Z Q ~o Y I 1 EXISTING , MIDDLE SCHOOL C 1 AND LIBRARY . . ~ 1(J_Lll1~ 1 EXISTING I 1 SANCTUARY F I j °^TSr ' L. T ~ ~ I i i / L------------n ---SW MCKENZIE STREET ~~v r 1 EXISTING OVERFLOW PARKING i r (~IIIIIIilllllllllll~.' i • • EXISTING CAMPUS PLAN ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH AND SCHOOL MASTER PLAN ADDENDUM FIGURE / TIGARD, OREGON NOVEMBER 2002 sninmmq nwr I m 3Q 2 2 U 4 U a co / 1 Tli -...J'~~t!!~i!?•:= Elf -3j a e ...-....R f ~ f c:D {t i S 0 J Q r~ i:1 51 uleew".ti f _.1 I._• `-~^'f.%~'~ ! : f_. f f lam i i if `~-fxf ' .:.•.i~'~'.S'~i:i.t3°ll> tax i f ~ _i . - ~ j _.,.*.--~''x1:YS,j~:~'•~•'?~.'i-»'•2:' ';;sue w,'._ ~ •t F E.,3~. fir.? , x 1~ ;{-...~..t ~f;-~'.,•: _ ~ 1, °f- r C ,1 \ ~W ~L3xk t W-, - r{t~~iH (N0 it; 1 i 9 PRO 1 <<j< - c~ f ! .l iGi!b~ !J r 'try!-~•~l- _ 5611Jif t AGE ti; r jl 2rf(} • FEB-17-04 TUE 01:16 PM JOHN..E.000K 5 6579 4752 DISPOSAL COMPANY P.O. Box 880 Sherwood, OR 67140 (503)625,6177 AAUNN~ jw ~ February 17, 2004 Tear Mr. John Cook, We at Pride Disposal have reviewed and approve the development of the 1,000 square foot bailding on 12630 Grant Avenue Tigard, Oregon. St. Vincent De Paul has our approval to go ahead with this project. We see no hindrances. Sincerely, G' Craig Schmidt Driver inanager Pride Disposal (503) 625-6177 P.02 pq Z0/Z2 3obd r1drnted on 10096 recycled paper. WdNlQ~ rdsodSIQ 3QI`cfd 6LI9SZ9£09 EZ;ZZ G00c;/91/Z0 01/15/04 13:40 FAX 503846352 0- 13-2004 02:26PM FROM- . CleanWater Sen ices Our commitment is clear. CLEAN WATER SERVICES • r L 1U,.Sensitive Area-p-1 cre Jurisdiction 1 ~~H2Q ~fD P_ Map & Tax Lot h 1 co ?_J3'D paeoa Site Address sv/ (Jrah1~ Proposed Activity c~,.Ls--2"c,- ti 1 o©psr Y N NA ❑ ® ❑ Sensitive Area Composite Map Map# a't.5lw,# ❑ ❑ n Locally adopted studies or maps Specify Date [a 001 T-144 P.001/003 F-006 Ffle Number 2-1.2,6 Ing Site Assessment Owner Sir ~rs,~ Q,s►~, Contact, Address 32?~'3 s~Yer,.c2~e T<<a - C'-)e °3'72'Z Phone Y N NA ❑ ❑ ® Stonmwater Infrastructure map!3 QS 44 51 9 ❑ ❑ a Other Specify Based on a review of the above information and the requirements of Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Resolution and Order No. 00.7: ❑ Sensitive. areas potentially exist on. site. or within 200'. of. the site. THE. APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER OR STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties, a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. Sensitive areas do. not appear to. exist on, site or within 200' of the site. This. pre- screening site assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. NO FURTHER SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. THIS FORM WILL SERVE AS AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE A STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. ❑ The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development. NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. Comments: Reviewed By:~ Post-it° Fax Note 7671 hate r G pages r To O G ~ From /.K!/[►.K ~G,6Gt9Fti Co./DePL ~Co. el -C~ Phone # IPhone # SU3 ;r %s II Date: Returned to Applicant Mail Faxes Counter Date 1 //-T1 q By4o!~_ L Fax # s,,o 3 - Gqq 6o7 lFax # CleanWater Services Our c(mmiilnicnt i, clcnr. October 7, 2002 GC i 1 9 Westlake Consultants Kim Shera 15115 SW Sequoia Pkwy, Suite 150 Tigard, OR 97224 Re: Expansion of St. Anthony's Church at 9905 SW McKenzie St, Tigard (CWS File 2403, Tax map 2S1 02131D, Tax lot 100) Clean Water Services has reviewed your proposal for the above referenced activity on your site. Staff has conducted a pre-screen review and requested completion of a Sensitive Areas Certification Form. Following the review it appears that sensitive areas do not exist on-site or within 200' from your project. In light of this result, this document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 00-7, Section 3.02.1, and your Stormwater Connection authorization from Clean Water Services as required by Ordinance 27, Section 4.13. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local, state, and federal law. This concurrence letter does NOT eliminate the need to protect sensitive areas if they are subsequently identified on your site. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 503-846-3613. Sincerely, v - Heidi K. Berg Environmental Plan Review E:\Development Svcs\SP 00-7\Concurrence Letters\2S102BD00100 St Anthony's Church.doc 155 N First Avenue, Suite 270 - Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 Phone: (503) 846-8621 - Fax: (503) 846-3525 - www.cleanwaterservices.org FEB. 9.2004 10:51RM • • ,F Request for Commercial Service \"Portland General Electric Applicant Information: - - " N0.985 r,.3 PCE Work Request # Project/Customer Name: PQC» C~ rH u ~ AZ<A Si 5 M0 10 c) 1~FmFZrL-brA.0 1K 01ZIEIR~L01Ak Service Address; I Zco 150 s Fz.4 Kr A%ris. City: " C.'. Oe-m . Nearest Cross Street cSl c-IeQKZi m. 5 r Billing Information: Name: ( z-=S S~ u Company Name: ~r A-er+io n» Mailing Address: °»05 SAY crle lG.zcs= City- ,b-Pr state O e- Zir S? 22`~ .qp Phone # al Contact Person: Name: ® f;~' gzazr IC r d Company Name: e4:=.- A ~c~., ~•r~rs s f~-~+Y~+tLi~S Mailing Address: t32~'3 s1,X ScrrrrssQm ity: Stated 7ip~? 22`3 Phone # Sc9'3 - <D4.4 4-222 S~3 -~~o --z 1 Gm, \ A Scaled Site Plan Showina Preferred Ground Level Service and Areter Location Must Accompanu This Comvleted Request (include on-line electrica'Ldiaaram) Commercial Service Information: New Service Size: 21310 ' ~ Amps Service Voltage Reque (~inele Phas~ Three Phase: Service Requested: e enh 7 Temporary Service Type Requested: OL._.v ahead) , Underground Conversion Relocate Estimated Connection Date- 5t-►MtY7 tl-p 2~ `V q-- Existing Account Number/Meter Number Operating Hours brie Sh;fr:-:~> Two Shifts Continuous Other r NEW COArATC17P ,LOAD, Uvoicai conversion factor. 1 ho=9ton=1 kw) 1 ~ mad TlWe 7 Phase I~PZ/rbns 'connected KW I ' ~s Lighting I I I I I Receptacles 1 ' I 1 S , ~vrr Water Heating I 1 I Coop I ( I~ nc,~ Electric Heat 1 co, J Refrigeratioo/HVAC Zfl InE~ -Largest size I ( CPC I I h`~ Motors* -Largest size Welders I -Largest size Computers Elevators Other Loads I ~s I K~S yo4 07 1 1 i ZAS Total Connected KW I 14. *Motors 10 HP and larger required to be equipped with reduced voltage starters. z `j. FEB. 9.2004 10:51AM 0 0 N0.985 P.4 • C) 43 nt CibT w ® t_ I L 1 gR" e S Ko P Project/Customer Dame S'T t&K-r 6l Or•>,,.,/ `p=~4 as I S +q Mufti-Family Service Information: Subdivision Or Minor Partition Number of lots: Or Manufactured Home Park Apt/Condo Number of units: Or Number of Sldgs: Ro'whouse/To+wnhouse Amps per Unit: S+Ft. per Unit: Number of House Services: Service Size (Amps): Service voltage: Service Type Requested; Overhead Underground Conversion Relocate Estimated Connection Date; Eleo hIcAM - *GAS Lighting Water Heater Range Space Heater/Furnace Air conditioning/Heat Pump Tons Lock Rotor Amps Number of AC/HP Units Largest motor I Other Load data must be as complete as possMle. Cost of design changes due s-~ to inadequate/inaccurate information will be borne by the property owner or electrician. Load data forms without playas will be delayed and/or not processed. Site, grading, utility and landscaping plans are requited to complete piste electrical design.. Customer Sigmtu • Date 2/ 1(-,/ 0{- Must have signature to process) P$ S~3 ` TRI-COUNTY SERVICE COORDINATORS: 3700 SE 17 Ave, Portland, OR 97202 Office phone: (503)736-5450 Fax: (503)736-5451, (503)736,,5452 SALEM SERVICE COORDINATOR: 4245 Kale St NE, Salem, OR 97305 Office Phone: (503)463-4348 Fax: (303)463-4308 (Page 2 of 2) • M Portland General Electric Company MEMORANDUM 03/04/04 TO: CONTACT: EKA Architects-Robert Klas PHONE: 503-644-4222 CUSTOMER NAME: St. Vincent DePaul Society ADDRESS: 12630 SW Grant Ave., Tiqard OR 97223 FROM: ENGR/SDC: Ken Gutierrez PHONE: 503-570-4412 SUBJECT: SINGLE-PHASE SECONDARY LINE-LINE FAULT CURRENT (RIVIS) TRANSFORMER DATA XFMR Impedance 1.50 % TRANSFORMER SIZE: 100 KVA Secondary VOLTAGE (L to L): 240 v t, VAULT--> VAULT (or Pole Pole) SECONDARY Secondary Wire LENGTH: 0 Feet WIRE SIZE Number of SECONDARY RUNS: 1 Run(s) of: Secondary WIRE Resistance R: 0.0773 Ohms/1000' Secondary WIRE Reactance X: 0.0258 Ohms/1000' VAULT (or Pole) PANEL SECONDARY (or Svc D rot)) Service Wire LENGTH: 140 Feet WIRE SIZE Number of Service RUNS: 1 Run(s) of: I#2 TX Service WIRE Resistance R: 0.2620 Ohms/1000' Service WIRE Reactance X: 0.0280 Ohms/1000' FAULT CURRENT: 2,912 Amps (or SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT) RMS Symmetrical (or INTERRUPTING CURRENT) Based on a panel size of: 200 Amps To Print Thls Page "Ctrl .M and'choose rint 1 Phase Data Template by: Wayne Amondson Converted to Excel by Allen Campbell, BEST Consulting 1/25/2000 RECEIVED MAR 1 0 2004 STOA Int'I * EKA i i • Portland General Electric Applicant Project Name Service Address Mailing Address Line Extension Cost Agreement EKA ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS-Robert Klas Date 03/04/04 St. Vincent DePaul Society 12630 SW Grant Ave, Tigard,..OR 97223 6775 SW 111th Ave, Suite 20 Beaverton OR 97008 A. Line extension costs eligible for allowance: B. Allowance: C. Applicant responsibility (A - B): D. Line extension costs NOT eligible for allowance: E. Premium underground equipment not eligible for allowance F. Total applicant responsibility (C + D + E): Payment terms: Cash In Advance AGREEMENT PGE agrees to install your line extension for the amount described in `Total applicant responsibility", Line F above, under these terms and conditions: 1 • You are responsible for obtaining necessary easements, and the costs thereof are not included in included in this agreement. 2. Unless otherwise indicated, the calculation of the line extension costs assumes standard construction and a route determined by the Company. 3. The terms of this Agreement are subject to change if the line extension is not completed within six months of the Agreement date or if there are any changes in construction design. 4. You have no ownership rights in the line extension materials or easements other than the right to a refund as described in Section 5. 5. In the event additional customers are served off this line extension within five years from the date the line extension is energized, you may be entitled to a refund of part of the amount shown on line "C" above. In order to qualify for a refund, the applicant responsibility (Line C) must have exceeded $100 and you must request a refund from PGE within six years from the date your line extension was energized. 6. The costs shown above on Line F represents applicant's acceptance of standard underground equipment. Non-standard underground equipment is an option at an additional cost shown in Line E. Applicant Name (please print) Applicant Signature Phone Job No. WR 328503 $ 2;646.07 $ 1,928.56 $ 717.51 j 717.51 PGE Representative KENNETH L: GUTIERREZ ~Phon e 503-570 4412 9480 SW Boeckman Rd, Wilsonville, OR 97070 PGE 71910 (Oct 2001+A19) ~P V f a INSTALL 3" POLE CONDUIT UNIT WITH 12" BRACKETS AND WEATHERHEAD / 00028 1995-45 J~ P ° f 14~ 9eC 1703 ~~A C 25 78576 ~G 1.6 k O 00011 1991-30 01819- 07180/ PL00011 01819- 07185/ PL00011 01819- 07206/ PL00002 00002 1988-25 120/240 200A „ 2.77 VD 2.67 FLKR 2912 AIC 91 4/0 , 2 l~ 55~ , .n , 1 /0 4 1/0 4 4/0 2C 100 1011 VT 05745 /0 2 VICINITY MAP JOB SITE n G~ Ij5 I-kk ~ FONNE~.wq~~ ~ E / L G C DONALD GAARDE 1 BON I TA TwmAs GLIDE I 1655-E4 C 25 / 02007 Q 1962-40 01819- 07200/ PL02007 01819- 00320/ PL02007 Ng19S \CG 9CSR I 6 r4, 1-14 F25T PL02007 3-1F i 142 C/O FIST INSTALLI 17200V OH 25 C01 120/240V 800A 9905 i TRANSDFER EXIST TX TO NEW TRANSFORMER ABC 75 30599 h~ QPP PD 0052 BC AL-TX-D 82-45 01819- 00300/ PL02006 S& X16 1W 00012 1977-35 5 22536 ~tiz I~. SJ C;~ 01819- 00780/ PL00041 00041 1952-60 QP WR CHECKLIST ITEM I NO I YES HOLEDIGGER I X BOON I X I BACKHOE I X I PGE TRENCH I X I LOCATES I X STAKING I X FLAGGING X TREETRIM I X EASEMENT I X PERMITS X CUTSHEET I X SHUTDOWN ( X UG CIR. VER. ( X CALL BEFORE YOU DIG: OREGON LAW REQUIRES YOU TO REQUEST UTILITY LOCATION 2 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. FOR LOCATES CALL THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER AT 503-246-6699 OR 1-800-332-2344. CONTACT GENERAL FOREMAN 7 TO 10 WORKING DAY'S PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. CONDUIT INSPECTION REQUIRED PRIOR TO BACKFILL. PGE WILL NOT INSTALL WIRE UNTIL TRENCH IS 100% BACKFILLED. RICK BEEKS EXCAVATION CO: GENERAL FOREMAN CONTACT: PHONE: (503) 672-5502 CELL: 572-7318 PHONE: STREETLIGHT SPECIALIST: JEFF STEIGLEDER SERVICE INSPECTOR: PHONE: (503) 570-4404 CELL: 849-6548 i COMMERCIAL LEGEND NEW PGE FACILITIES TO BE INSTALLED (UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED) - - - - - - - - INSTALL 1-02/0 AL-TX OH SDECONDARY - - - - - - - - INSTALL 1-°4/0 AL-TX SECONDARY IN 3" PVC CONDUIT PROVIDED & INSTALLED BY CUSTOMER WAMA&Z FACILITIES IN GREEN TO BE REMOVED CONSTRUCTION NOTES: COM L CUSTOMER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL TRENCH, CONDUIT. VAULTS. PADS AND ROAD CROSSINGS. 2. ALL CONDUIT TO BE INSTALLED 36 INCHES GAM BELOW FINAL GRADE. 3. ALL PGE CONDUCTORS TO BE INSTALLED IN GRAY, SCHEDULE 40, ELECTRICAL GRADE. PVC CONDUIT WITH NYLON PULL STRINGS 0181.500 LBS. TEST). POE TO DETERMINE THE SIZE AND NUMBER OF CONDUITS REQUIRED. MAINTAIN 12 VERTICAL INCHES AND 24 HORIZONTAL INCHES CLEARANCE BETWEEN GAS AND OTHER UTILITIES. ALL ELBOWS TO BE 36 INCH OIIN) RADIUS. ALL BENDS MUST BE FACTORY MADE. CONDUIT RUNS LONGER THAN 150 FEET OR WITH MORE THAN 270 DEGREES OF BENDS MUST USE RIGID STEEL ELBOWS, OR PGE APPROVED FIBERGLASS AND MUST BE APPROVED BY PGE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION BY CUSTOMER. 4. ALL PGE TRANSFORMERS TO BE INSTALLED B FEET GM FROM ANY COMBUSTIBLE BUDDING AND 4 FEET (MIN) FROM ANY FIRE HYDRANT. PGE TRANSFORMERS MUST BE WITHIN B FEET OF A DRIVEABLE AREA. ALWAYS MAINTAIN 10 FEET CLEARANCE IN FRONT OF ALL TRANSFORMERS. 5. TRANSFORMER PADS ARE TO BE SET SO THAT THE TOP IS 2 INCHES ABOVE FINAL GRADE. CONDUIT S TO BE INSTALLED IN PAD AS INDICATED IN DETAIL AND TO EXTEND I INCH ABOVE THE PAD. 6. STEEL BARRIER POSTS ARE REQUIRED AROUND TRANSFORMERS THAT ARE EXPOSED TO VEHICLES. 7. PGE TO BE NOTFED AND INSPECT ALL CONDUIT, VAU LT AND PAD INSTALLATIONS BEFORE BACKFILL ALL NEW VAULT A PAD LOCATIONS TO BE FEND VERIFIED WITH PGE AND CUSTOMER REPRESENTATIVE. 8. REFER TO LETTER OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR FURTHER DETAILS AND THE OREGON ELECTRIC SERVICE REQUIREMENTS BOOKLET FOR SPECIFIC REOUIREMENTS. 9. DESIGN IS BASED ON STANDARD UNDERGROUND EQUIPMENT. NON-STANDARD UNDERGROUND EQUIPMENT MAY BE AN OPTION AT AN ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CUSTOMER. IO. THE POINT OF DELIVERY AND DIVISION OF OBNERSW BETWEEN THE CUSTOMER AND PfE WILL BE AT THE LINE SIDE OF THE NEV CUSTOMER PROVIDED S01TCH GEAR. ~SUILT ~I~I D~~~WgO®l depictscField Dcumnt accurately Design drawing during construction. Foreman: Date: SDC Engineer: Date: Designer: Date: www.PortlandGeneral.com www.PortlandGeneral.biz www.EarthAdvantage.com JOB NO, DATE SECTIONISI SCALE 328503 3/4/2004 C21-02B 1'=60' CIRCUIT SIZE TIGARD 13362 IIxl7 PGE TITLE ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY LOCATION 12630 SW GRANT ST, TIGARD DESCRIPTION SHEET WILSONVILLE INSTALL UG SVC TO BLDG LINE CREW CENTER DESIGN BY PHONE (503) DRAWN BY I OF 1 9480 SW BOECKMAN RD KEN GUTIERREZ 570-4412 R.CAMPBELL WILSONVILLE, OR 97070 0 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. reducing congestion on Johnson Street and Grant Avenue. The City should monitor or enlist the applicant to monitor the success of the measure(s) used to reduce congestion at least for a reasonable period of time after it/they take(s) effect. The results of this monitoring should be available to the public on request at no more than the cost of production and should be considered in any future review of phase IB. The planning manager should be authorized to suspend monitoring when he or she finds it is no longer warranted to ensure compliance with the condition. 7. Adoption of recommended conditions of approval as amended will ensure final plans are submitted consistent with the applicable City approval and development criteria and standards and will prevent, reduce or mitigate potential adverse impacts of the development consistent with the requirements of the Tigard Community Development Code. D. CONCLUSIONS The hearings officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit, bicycle parking variance and building setback adjustment do or can comply with the applicable approval criteria and standards of the Tigard Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to ensure such compliance occurs. The hearings officer also concludes that the applicant failed to sustain the burden of proof that the proposed variance to the street tree requirements complies with the applicable approval standards for such a variance; however, deferral of street tree planting until phase IB is warranted. Substantial evidence in the record and the reasonable interpretations of relevant ambiguous CDC provisions by the hearings officer support these conclusions. E. DECISION 1. The hearings officer hereby denies VAR 2002-00044 (regarding street trees on the McKenzie Street frontage of the site) but authorizes the applicant to defer lantinL of those trees until directed by the City as part of the improvement oft etc enzie Street frontage of the site consistent with this final order. ` 2. The hearings officer further hereby approves CLIP 2002-00006 (phases IA and IB of the St. Anthony's expansion), VAR 2002-00043 (a.50°lo variance to the minimum number_of. bicycle.parktng spaces), and a 2-foot adjustment for the southwest corner of the gymnasium, subject to the conditions in section II of the Staff Report, with the following amendments: a. Condition of approval 5 is hereby amended to read as follows: 5. Before the City issues a permit for phase 113 construction, the applicant s'hall' submit and receive approval of a revised site plan showing that the resulting development will comply with minimum off-street parking standards in TDC Chapter 18.765 for alt'new parking spaces on the site. Parking in the McKenzie Street right of way does not count toward those requirements. On the date of this decision, 233 on-site parking spaces are required. b. Condition of approval 6 is hereby amended to read as follows: 6. Before the Cityissues.a site permit,fpr.phase..IB,.,or_.three.years from the date of this final order plus extensions authorized by law, whichever is first, the applicant shall abandon the eleven.,paxki CUP 2002-00006 and VAR 2002-00043 & 44 Hearings Officer Final Order (St. Anthony's Expansion) Page 6 • spaces that encroach into the McKenzie Street right of way and 4p_ply.. for a_Public Facility Impoyement„(PFT) pernvt.to improve the north half of the McKenzie Street right of way abutting the site t6 the extent not already improved to applicable standards. c. Condition of approval 26 is hereby added to read as follows: 26. Prior to issuance of occupancy permits for development authorized in phase IA, the applicant shall submit and receive approval of a plan to reduce AM peak hour congestion on Johnson Street and Grant Avenue. The plan shall include one or more of the means to reduce congestion discussed herein or other means the planning manager finds can be effective. The plan also shall include a means of measuring the effect of implementing the plan. The planning manager shall approve a plan that he or she finds has a reasonable likelihood of reducing congestion on Johnson Street and Grant Avenue and of being monitored. The City should monitor or enlist the applicant to monitor the success of the measure(s) used to reduce congestion at least for a reasonable period of time after it/they take(s) effect. The results of this monitoring shall be made available to the public on request at no more than the cost of production and should be considered in any future review of phase IB. The planning manager may suspend or waive further monitoring when he or she finds it is no longer warranted, (e.g., because congestion has declined or at least not increased in duration). T isPdayofM Larry p em, . AI City of Tiard d W Hearings Officer g CUP 2002-00006 and VAR 2402-00043 & 44 Hearings Officer Final Order (St. Anthony's Expansion) Page 7 0 0 . 0 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL )4r Irk 4 f ccrF ! is~, r: r4a~,~ }voS `,o, z~ laY tl~n c yr , ,:.,.,uanr u , 'r),w ,n,rfu,,,', v '~R!i?'4 4" `!ry THE FOLLOW IVGICONDITIONS`SHAL bi, 11 ii'§iI9~~I!i~jWi ~l % wl. , ..,u~w ft~a.~tl!,Irlvnulq'rNl~;ndpd §a nnn.,llic,s wvu~SJku~~rr:,nfa. a rL7•wru..t.No,r:.urgsn>^kt?rc.n NDlORtiL'~BEtSATISFIED r ~~~~,I i;~! i `PRIOR TO ISSUANCE;, THE'SITES°ABUIL®ING"! RMI.TS.~ :~I!!iw,I~,iii!~glp~. A,l, ,~1;~, :.l Jh1,: r~. ,rr,:..cr~iJ ~.9rMiN~l.,.,i;rs~!a:~PF~~,tl7•.;~~ r, ~ t I n ~i,e~rntn~.era;.t ii n r~,..~.ni ,.u~,;;~~, h v ,.z.,rsi~'r~wrstl,n~,,~Ir.Gkaa~ry'„dti+;~ri~„ r~,:~,al4u~„m^s~~l~rraa%,u~;li emit to the planning Department (Brad i y, 639-4T7 ,ext. 24 for review ancf approval: 1. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall comply with the protection measures prescribed by the City Arborist. The applicant shall provide the City Arborist with a construction sequence including installation and removal of tree protection devices, clearing, grading, and paving. 2. Prior to any site work, The applicant shall notify the City Arborist when tree protection measures are in place so that he may verify that the measures will function properly prior to construction. 3. Prior to the issuance of any site permits for phase-tQ, the applicant shall provide City staff with a revised landscape plan demonstrating compliance with VC Section 18.745.050 (E)(1)(a). The applicant shall include placement of-trees,with.in the interior of all new parking areas throughout the ..site at a ratio of one tree for every seven parking spaces and located within islands that are three feet wide and protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. 4. Prior to the issuance of any permits on hale 1.B the applicant shall provide the City with a lands ca ._in lan„r to show compliance MM TDC Section 18.745.040 (Street Trees. The revision h II n Nclude str et trees .alcnq the entire frontages of SW Grant Street, 21011 ' and.., on 3(reet. 5. Prior to the issuance of any site permits r phase 1 B_ construction,' the applicant shall provide the City with a parking plan t a sows th.._the_ ' ' um parkin 2.33 wSa__ces on__site. The plans a demonstra e comp lance wI Imensional an . materia~i- requlreilnents of TDC Chapter 18.765 for all new parking spaces on site.. In the event that phase 1 B is not constructed within the approval period of this decision, the Church shall abandon._the, eleven spaces that encroach into the right-of-way along SW McKenzie. .a nu make all necessa „r improvements to the parking areas on site to bring them into compliance with the Tigard Development Code. 6. Prior to the issuance of building permits for the new structure, the applicant shall provide revised plans that illustrate compliance with the 20-foot side yard setback along the southeast corner of the gymnasium. 7. Prior to the issuance of final occupancy permits for improvements in phase 1A, the applicant shall provide the City with financial assurance for the value of the required landscaping. 8. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide a narrative detailing which one of the four methods will be chosen for solid waste and recyclable storage. A detail of the enclosure alon with any other necessary elements shall be submitted. "See Section 18.755.040 (C-6 The applicant shall provide the City with a new location or the facility outside of the front yard of the facility. If a new site cannot be found, the applicant shall seek a variance to the location standards of the. TDC. 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall revise the parking plan to comply with the Oregon Uniform Building Code and show seven (7) ADA accessible spaces as opposed to the six that are identified on the current site plan. 10. Prior to issuing building permits for either phase, the applicant shall submit a detailed ction off siteand complies with crime prevention lighting plan, that shows no pro1360.090(10).' requirements of the TDC Section ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 2 OF 27 CUP2002-00006NAR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 9/1912(1(13 PURLIC HEARING RTAFF PPPOPT Tf) Tt4l= NFAPIr\Ir1C r1CCIr'CD Johnson Street is partially improved at this time, but not fully. improved to City standards. The realignment of the proposed parking area in front of the proposed community center will require the access along SW Johnson to be revised:. While alleviating some of the queuing problems that presently occur, the revision will require that the access be brought to current city standards. According to TDC18.810.030(A)(3), "no development shall occur unless streets adjacent to the development meet the standards of this chapter, provided, however, that a development mayy be approved if the adjacent street does not meet the standards, but half-street improvements meeting the standards of this title are constructed adjacent to the development. In this particular instance, the City has made the necessary paved improvements to the street, but has not made the curb, sidewalk, and street tree improvements along 320 feet of SW Johnson. As a part of Phase 1 B,. these improvements must be completed to meet City standards. Udiffl iP Street is classified as a local residential street and operates as a one-way roadway. The primary traffic on this roadway is for school traffic. Vehicles travel in a westerly direction .from 99W. The roadway is fully improved except for street trees. The applicant has requested an adjustment to the street tree requirement to allow planting of street trees along the south side of McKenzie Street and along the east side of Grant Avenue adjacent to the existing parking lot at that location. The reason for the adjustment is to preserve some existing onsite parking spaces on the church site until such time that more parking spaces are added.in the future phase. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewialks be constructed to meet City desogn. standards and ' be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. There is,existing sidewalks along both Grant Avenue and McKenzie Street. Sidewalk_ will be added to Johnson Street as a part of Phase 1 B. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.C states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sewer line in Johnson Street that has ample capacity to serve this development. The applicant's plan shows that the sewer from the addition will be routed via a new onsite line that will connect to the public line in Johnson Street. A public facility improvement (PFI) is needed for the work in the ROW of Johnson Street. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.C states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the. facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000' and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no existing upstream drainage areas that affect this site. _ ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 21 OF 27 CUP2002-00006NAR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2t1 wonni P11111 IC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER a RUR MG ME { APPLICANT: KLP,C Phone: (5a) (,wy-, yas1 PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): a u-s p NON-RESIDENTIAL rPRV3 r"tQP_ 1~ 0ag6 010960 NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: Crn!a)',t,A:I!,AL_ v fgtr~c AGENT: Phone: ( ) PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: crx~r+i._ Arr, la 1.()() s,+t{{Qctr4P (T_C'r~ka.(` nti1 4 d i i 01% s'G C,Q ~,e 4on K'~ 4,e 0r_ CJ, % COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: n f~ S,4 ~Ri_ ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: P" t2 CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM (C.I.T.) AREA:h K _ ~ ~l Q1S'd g~.•J~.S ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18. SkO l ~a° 18.330 Awunmsr MINIMUM LOT SIZE: _)8,860 sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: ft. Max. building height: ft. Setbacks: Front 1 S ft. Side S ft. Rear IS ft. Corner V0 ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: "~C0 Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: 06 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handou" THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S), AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meetinq is to be held prior to submittinq vour -application or the application will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section NARRATIVE [Refer to Code Chapter 18.3901 The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable. approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. f~ IMPACT STUDY [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. ' The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18305 and 183651 Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: 3(~ Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18305.0301 WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. ❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS [Refer to Code Chapter 18 01 ➢ STREETS: feet fro . he centerline of LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. > FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE/YARD SETBACK. i ❑ SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS fer to Code Section 18.730.010.BJ BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTION Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided tyta ➢ A maximum building floa to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ➢ All actual building setbll be at least half ('/z) of the building's height; and ➢ The structure will not asidential zon ed district. j*o -,o rz-, BUFFERING AND SCREENING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) S 6 r p_6. o wl Lg.s In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON-Residential AppricalionlPlanning Division Section • • The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: 01 feet along north boundary. t~..X) feet along east boundary. Cry D' tkv. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT613SCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: LANDSCAPING [Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18365 and 183051 STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public .right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to-A.0 feet apart depending. on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. -Farther information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas In order to provide a vegetative-canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. RECYCLING [Refer to Code Chapter 181551 Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny. Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. BARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.0401 REQUIRED parking for this type of use: 1~ nun 1 lN Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: ➢ All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. ➢ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ❑ LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS tR er to Code Section 18.765.0801 Every COMMERCIAL OR I USTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading ace. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON•Residen6al ApplicaGonlPlanning Division Section BICYCLE RACKS (Beier to Code Section 18.7651 BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ❑ SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1151 The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS RICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHI THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON S OPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to eliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- appplication conference based on available inf rmation. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their bou daries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands Must be clearly indicated on Dlans submitted with the development aDDlication. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulation for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. ❑ STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.775.080.C) When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issu ce of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval s ndards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall b ased upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for ach' ving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. [ CLTANWATER SERVICES 1CWS1 BUFFER STANDARDS (Beier to R a 0 96-041USA Regulations -Chapter 31 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION & ORDER 96-44 "gg4+5'FS, Y~3 7~ S' l~yt°hr'' is trA4,,~~SSrS:EA~ q ..yet ~14IA :,iwl~rif ptrxb~Yrt~nty "ap "yBF :t c ~u YJ"tCEN,T , . tDT I.O.F ~1/EGE~ATED~3 " 4 SENS DIVE A EADEFINITION w, {yra;_°,u+lhtiw n ~`i F.i~~OSEfNS~TYEARE'A~3,'uCORRIDOFERkSIDE.e y e Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% 10 to <50 acres 15 feet > 50 to < 100 acres 25 feet e Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet e Existing or created wetlands > 0.5 acre <25% 50 feet e Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow e Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres e Natural lakes and ponds e Streams with intermittent flow draining: > 25% 10 to <50 acres 30 feet 4 > 50 to < 100 acres 50 feet e Existing or created wetlands > 25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure e Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting e Streams with intermittent flow draining > 100 acres point to the top of ravine (break in e Natural lakes and ponds <25% slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine' 4Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds, whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor, shall not serve as a starting point for measurement SVegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 'The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet, if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residential Apprication/Planning Division Section • Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. SIGNS [Refer to Code Chapter 183801 SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18390.030.CJ A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location,' size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: 0 Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; 0 Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; 0 Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; 0 Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. [MITIGATION [Refer to Code Section 18190.060.EJ REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: .0 The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 183951 The Cit requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT ~8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. ❑ ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer Code Section 18.810.060) MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unles of is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must h e a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL WT EXCEED 2%2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than I Y2 times the min' um lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS 18.330 (Conditional Use) 18.340 (Directors Interpretation) 18.3 50 (Planned Development) 18.360 (Site Development Review) 18.370 (Variances/Adjustments) _ 18.380 (Zoning Map/rext Amendments) 18.385 (Miscellaneous Permits) I/ 18.390 (Decision Making Procedurestimpact Study) 18.410 (Lot Line Adjustments) _ 18.420 (Land Partitions) 18 430 (Subdivisions) . 510 18 (Residential Zoning Districts) . _ 18.520 (Commercial Zoning Districts) / _ 18.530 (Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.620 (Tigard Triangle Design Standards) 18.630 (Washington Square Regional Center) 18.705 (Access/EgresslCimulation) 18.710 (Accessory Residential Units) 18.715 (Density Computations) 18.720 (Design Compatibility Standards) 18.725 (Environmental Performance Standards) 18.730 (Exceptions To Development Standards) 18.740 (Historic Overlay) 18.742 (Home Occupation Permits) 18.745 (Landscaping & Screening Standards) 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) 18.755 (Mixed Solid WastelReyycling Storage) 18.760 (Nonconforming Situations) 18.765 (Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes NON-Residential Appricalion/Planring Division Section 18.775 (Sensitive Lands Review) 18.780 (signs) 18.785 (Temporary use Permits) 18.790 (Tree Removal) 18.795 (visual Clearance Areas) - 18.798 (Wireless Communication Facilities) -Z1 8.810 (stmet & Utility Improvement Standards) Page 6 of 8 v 060DITIOU CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: r S i l~JI S e~ ~eake.~ 0 1,:eek~t ~o A CYCC~'~S ~~;;te Gt„ ,1;<'Rri~t^, hCta k~ ,n Il?.~>r,, „s c~, r.)t ,^4,~nr~cicr~ Mt.t.~~r,r~ v t l1 ~ Ka•',cj r ~ i, e' ~ C..~,.15 5 t=r~.~ r c:.~ ~,~`e~~1 r ' OC4 O p C1.~~~ar~ ~ ('S©~ 1 C.n~Y -3(.~C'1G -r✓~-,~-~r>~ t~. ..~.;fT 4, \ l \ l I ~k'' 4VFPRta~~~IF. mk\sl C-M C'-V.n A-t,.rs c-l", of-, T1GTL~P'('7S «f.'.C_C'.5$rb~,t,V~~ U PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division.acceptance may be returned. The Planninq counter closes at 4:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One !1), 8'/: x 11" map of a proposed proiect should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Residential AppGca6onlPlanning Division Section • . The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard ('n1, C',. . A basic flowchart which illustrates the review process is available from the. Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division. will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policv is to apply those svstem development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE the conterence and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects re a e o site planning that should appl to the development of your site plan; Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: & IAO ISM L-n I CITY OF TIGARD PLAN41NG DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (S03) 639-4111 FAX: (503) 684-1291 E-MAIL (staffs first name1 G.tlgaard.or.us TITLE 18 (CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (ODE) INTERNET ADDRESS: www.ci.tigard.or.us K: pattylmasterslPre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 3-Oct-02 (Engineering section: preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Map(s): 2S102BO Tax LONSi: 00800 Use Type: Residential The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a rLo'ection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-wav dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ® SW Grant Avenue to 27 feet from centerline ® SW McKenzie Street to 27 feet from centerline ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet Street improvements: ® Half street improvements will be necessary along SW Grant Avenue, to include: ® 16 feet of pavement from centerline ® concrete curb ® storm sewers and other underground utilities Z 5-foot concrete sidewalk with planter strip ® street trees ® street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGAR0 P"Plication Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department SeMon ❑ Other: . • • ® Half street improvements will be necessary along SW McKenzie Street, to include: ® 16 feet of pavement from centerline ® concrete curb ® storm sewers and other underground utilities ® 5-foot concrete sidewalk with planter strip ® street trees ® street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk CITY OF TIURD Pre-Applicatlon Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, trafficf ntrol devices, streetlights and a two-Bear streetlight fee. • ❑ Other: Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: ,(1.) Applicant may request that they be allowed to enter into an aareement for future street improvements (2.) Overhead Utilitv Lines: ® Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW Grant Avenue and SW McKenzie Street. Prior to final buildinq inspection, the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Yet rzt--eo' t r" U► ~.1 P.c°Y I E Sanitarv Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located in SW Grant Avenue. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to provide a connection to the public sewer if needed. Water Supply: The qfty of Tigard (Phone:(503) 639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 612-70101 provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department SeeUoo information regarding the ar1equacy of circulation systems, the Wed for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protn. • Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Detention is required if the net new impervious surface area exceeds 5000 square feet. Storm Water Quality: i`ko ArZ_'C-A The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from Newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ? ® Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ❑ Payment of the fee in-lieu. Water quality is required if the net new impervious surface area exceeds 1000 square feet. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee CITY OF TIGARD Pre4WIlcatlon Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section category. The TIF shall calculated at the time of build' hermit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of tIF may be allowed to be deferredwil the issuance of an occupancy • permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. Pay TIF. PERMITS Public Facilitv Improvement (PFI) Permit: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. NOTE: Engineering Staff time will also be tracked for any final design-related assistance provided to a Permittee or their engineer prior to submittal of a PFI permit application. This time will be considered part of the administration of the eventual PFI permit. The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows: NOTE: If an PSI Permit is required, the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Buildina Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. CITY OF TIGARD Pre4WpIIcatfon Conference Notes Page 5 01 6 Engineering Department SeWon Master Permit (MST).Ois permit is issued for all single anAlti-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY- ny,- K4%UV 1 - 4,-m4- ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT STAFF DATE Phone: 15031639-4111 Fax: 15031624-0152 document2 Revised: September 2, 2003 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applicatlon Conference Notes Page 6 91 6 Engineering nepartmentsection WKS Associates 0 ) (m~ (m) I m ' Bike ( ) • Major Collector Center Turn Lane or Median 12' 14' 12' R/W 74' 3 Lanes 26 - ik CITY OF TIGARD Transportation System Plan 6' 5.5' 6.5 Bike . (M) I (m) ' Minor Collector or Minimum Transit ) 1 6' 5' 6' 12' 12' 6' 5.5' 6.5 (mr, (m) (m) Bike R/W 60' I Bike I (m) I (m) I l 2 Lanes Commercial and Industrial 1: Center Turn Lane or Median 1.5' 5.5' 6' 12' 14' 12' 6' 5.5' 1.5' (mr (m) i Bike I I R/W 64' Bike I (m) I(Mi I , 3 Lanes Local Street (Standard) m R pppyyy 1. 5' 4' 32' (l (m) I I 4' I 5' (m) M RIW 38' (m) 1 Parking Both Sides (m) Minimum Required Width Q - On-street Parking 1 r G- l~ Figure 8-7 WASHINGTON COUNTY TYPICAL STREET CROSS SECTIONS i C r i i~ ti THOMAS M01 N'C~ ~ SA r i a i ~ 4 RO.W ~ PORTLAND OREGON ~ 1949 - - - - A `7 1 Q O PROPER?7 LINE .,e ,-~-C`-- ' ZONING CODE CITY OF TIGARD -DEVELOPMENT CODES 200i "'0-- QTR. SCALE MAP XX 0 . j .9 s 4, aar ~ DEVELOPMENTAL ~ jg~ 6Hf~ NOTES ,o ~ - - STANDARDS 18 510 ~ . LOT t R-12 290,778,26 SF MIN LOT SIZE IS 20,000 SF ~ ~ BQ Lot 3 ~ ~X15rING ~ I "SF-OU" ~ 78 ACRES PROJECT BUILDINGS LOCATION ~j N t 9~ P,4RKIN.~ N LAM. cLA55R00M - I I u, g ~x(5t. BASEBALL ~I~LD I ~ ' r = l~ 1 ~ I i ~M ~ ~ bU q r ~U xt5 ~ ~ ~ f, Lor ~ o u A z i ~ ~,J - • xl5r. • ODULA I ~ ~ ~ - E~C18?. • • • • ~i PARKING: I . _i a ~~r 3PAGE8 EX B r ` ~U` OUTDOOR PLAY t i W xl5t. % . i i t PARKING ` i _ Lr . r ~ucrr0 r yr J' ti . . ~ . 2 ~ 2~~, 1 Ursa • crc . ,Q ~ .i. ~ e~ . r. ~ J t ~ . ~X15r . I . _ xlar o~._._I~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ J i ~ ~ _ ~Y' rc_ r I t r I y, r t' ~ t-~ 2 ~ ' ~ c~ ~ ~ 2 ~ 0 y . ~ 4 ` ~ ~ ~ ' 1Q i ~ 4 . YA Q+- • ~ N ~ . . a c0 4..;.•.;.• ...i ~1`gq~ `2 X t. K .•i ~ ti A ING ~t . . ~ r 1 1! I ~ R R . ~ ' L( OF rCN 6 ~ ~ 5 .r i y _ _ _ - - - ~ RAUJ. ~ oNE ~uAY) C F-- f f 'C' r.._ r Y. . k x L x x x LOr "2 k AP RKING k L a k l 1 AL01 : 4m'-m° r DEDICATION 5 SIGN - 'ONE WAY - ENTER' 1. SEE SHEET A1.03 FOR ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN m NEW CONCRF-`e ADJUSTMENTS: A. 15 FT. SIDE YARD SETBACK SET DATE 315/03 B. 18 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES, 2. TRASH/RECYCLE ENCLOSURE CALLS. ® NEW BUILDING 1=I L5 2 NEW ADA COMPLIANT PARKING SPACE - 6 SIGN - 'ONE WAY - DO NOT F-NTER'. C. PARKING IN ROW. ON SW McKENZIE TO REMAIN FOR PHASE 1A CONST, BLgG5.5ERVEq SEE 11/Al. 5. JOB 211215.2 NEW LANDSCAPE PARKING IN R.O.W. TO BE REMOVED, STREET TREES TO BE PLANTED, & ADDITIONAL MIDDLE SCHOOL 11,620 5F 45,120 SF ~ _ ruin nu_tt ~n _ - - - . ~dr~ it r r~i• 3 AREA OF ADJUSTMENT. PAINTED ASPHALT SIGNAGE. GYMNASIUM 11,150 5F 4 5F/I OmO 5F CHURCH 10,100 5F I$0 5F RQD. Y ~ TRANSFORMER S REVISED VEHICLE CIRCULATION PATH FOR OFFICES 8,050 SF s t ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. VEHICLES TO BE DIRECTED MODULAR CLASSRMS. + 3,620 5F 21661 5F PROVIDEP BY MONITORS, NO STRIPING PROPOSED EXCEPT 45,120 5F PER KEY NOTE NOS. 6 4 1. THEREFORE, OK. ~l F ~STOA -OREGON\St Vincent DePau116796topo DWG Thu Jan i5 15 04 46 X004 STOA / EKA, P C. - NT Od0196L9 d38WnN 80f H~ ~J,9 03N03H0 311HM 608 ~A8 NMddO ,~8'LL k ai r-\nnnn Hannan\nnAln -tw '[`JVUI i innn nvvnii in ~ un nr.v 'NMONS 38 lON ldW S3111111(1 ONn~ ONn0i99 NO S~12NW 1NI`dd 9NI1S 1 ' JJ[( t'il i!ii~lti,.t b.. \:.er .,us.,~_~~ il'l i tit wuu - - ~ + !VW 1NI`dd 9NI1SLX3 W0~3 0314001 383M S311t111(1 ONf1089830N(1 ~ k . t ~ ,H2fdW HON38 Oab911 1VA831N1 8(i01N00 1044 3N0 'Z k ~ ~ ONO'Td Nbfll3d 6~no ~ ni ~o~ i - ~inuNnS~~ k OM1 133b1S 31zN3N~W 'M'f ~~Y ~4Y 1\VIJ.IIU IJ NON38 48b911 d0 ,U10„ 43dW`d1S SI ONd 13381S 31ZN3N~W 'M'S + ~ LOZ 'ON NbbW HON36 G ~SNOlSIn3~ ~ + ~iuni~\i Hann ~u~ in i~„un\inr,~ n•n o, nrnn Yivuunw nuinu~ L'9Lt ~ ~ £ i k k k + ,0'9Li 7A119 11117 ~A11J - ~ \ \ al\I 1 /µO~U VUV L no ~~NOO + a~ 313 ti'Sli ~ . ~ ,98'8Li i , ~ 30d36nS 313a0N00 r ,r / 0' 1 r 1.+:l it /~v ~ ~ ~ ti V' ~ + ~r ~d ~ 31zN3N~W 'M'S d0 83N800 MS 3Hl 1Y 88(14 N1 OSiO SS1R18 d NBbW HON38 08V911 30 ul0 W08~ '6Z OA9N =Wf11V0 1d41i83A 't /~O. S3NIl 3NOHd3l31 ONV OIb10313 Qb'3Hd3A0 -1/3- + ~ 3Nf1 3NOHd3131 -i- ~ ~ ' ~ S310N 3Nn 1d01d10313 -3- + ~ ,96't~Li $ 3NI1 a31bM -M- ~ ~ N3M3S Wa01S -15- + b3M3S ~21V11Nt5 -SS- ~1dA N31dM NN + Oy V '~S~ dWdi~ dIdHO 133HM 60M / ~z dOdO J1lfllln ONn0a0630Nn On + ~ d3S16 3NOHd3131 61 ,iL'4Li ~ Icn~ TIC Inc ~ ,9L~Li a~V❑ Irvw Ir.~o 310d ~3MOd dd + 310HN~W HW 1L~SL1 3lOd 1H9f1 dl + NOI1~A313 1N3ANI 31 / ~ ` ~OHONa An0 d0 ,u~ i" 1Nbaa~H 3a~ H3 / L a3uno lb aano ~0 30v~ + ~,dM3nlaa M/o 3NIl d31N30 ~ l0 + NISt~I Hait~J 60 ~ dl 3iau0N00 OI11aHdSe ?d + / C~\ dN3931 + ~ / ,~e'tiLi 3 , ~ ~S~~ ~ SiI dl 9~, ,i8'tiLi . • 6~ •`.lA. ,dL£li ~ ~ / Y ~ c~ n N oN~~nJ-1 , - ~ ~ / ~H~3N \ • / L x bL / ,'c2'~ , ~ ~ ' Oa ~ S~~Od 00~ 0 i ~ ' ' X08 1N3WnNOW NI ~ +~'Z~ • , s 3dld NONI „b/~ ~ , , ~ Y ~ s. ' ~ NJS r J1 • \ i~ ~ \ . OV ~ e S i ` ~ Oy i 1 ~ 6l lL1=1~0 31 ,69 ZLt =Wlb ~ ~ ' NIS~18HO1~O N NOS o ..'1. w ~ ~ . . , - ' ; . NOS o ~~r ,9~ ZL L =WI21 . \ NISb9HO1d0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L • . ' O~ , ,Lti'ZL ' .s l~-~bTr9 SOS ,LO'£ ~ . 6L ( ) X0/0'^/9 S3~IdX3 , 800L6 N093~0 N01~3A~38 ~s~' . 968L '3~d u1~Zl 'M'S O~19 ~ ' NOs i~la3H la3alb 'ONI S~OJ~~i1fTS ~ OB61 'BI Al(N' S ~S~I ~H £'£Li ~ / NQ~J 0 77~MS~1~ ' ' ~ • . , 1 , ~0~3A~~S aN~l s` 1dN01SS3dOdd ' ~ • ~ 0~~31SI93d ~ . . . . . ~ Os o ~ ~~l , ; ds 1 ,09 ELT T \ . . ~ \ i QOM AM ,Z6'lLt=110 31 ,ZL*W-1 -WIb AM / NISVB HOldO £OOZ 838r43030 0 L = p L 31doS \ N003b0 kiNnOO N010NIHSVM ouvoll Jo ,1110 '!9'M "M L 'N "S Z 'I 'Z N01133S 30 4/L MN 3H1 30 */L 3S 3Hl NI 89 011=31 1 4'L l d0l u030N3Wb NOI1100V 3111A08b311 H1NONw 6 lOl Ni invda0 1N301A *IS 803 3~OH HNbW Wd01 ,89 011=31 l0 / ,84' 4'L l -Wla ~ 3lQHNVW hdOIS 49 \ b91=31 70 ~3AHns DlHdVd9OdOl v1 y1 , l0 tiL t =WIa 3lOHNdW J)Jb11NbS' ,OL't9 t=31 l0 09 9'L l =WIa~ 3l 31OHNdW ~,WIINNS / z L ~ n 0 1 t~,! ~ ~ ~ z t~~\ ~ ~ C ~ o y A ~ ~ o ~ z z ~x«~ ~ ~ ~ o g ~ 9 rt LLl w ~ .u., ~1 3 ri, ~ 1:80 Zit ro ~y P a ~D . ter,., a' s,'"i,^~ ,;may " ~ ~ , o PA ~ a • U e`e y~rg ~ G° ~ r1: .m , 'S~;g itl ; t~„„~ : ,r a• ((77~o a ~fs~ C TS. J Fey H 5 b, E .tn` {Y:~.: Jt 9f11~Af ,N ' ~ 'xR' . ~ ` ~ ~ o r° ~M~"-~pt~e;:~~y.ct^~y L~IaY,~:',q:~~~ r~ ~a;~':~„.^j~ : Yb :~.a:,•v'~'`~ 'f ~ •r~~~`c ~a~."G~:+, e;r.n~"' C MH Dk - - - - - - - ,k7'"#i r*a~ ~s6t. I flea x. o~ ~ ~F,.:~,• • a Wood. » ~ 9 ~ x ~ ~,~~w ~ p ~i, „ j: ° ~.ay~" ~,r P a%~z>. 'nHSI~ `~rilt,~'rs .~.vt ~ .,~v' . xr,°~, ~wwC2.,~%~ O. ~ ~ oar <<; :A~~ s.. ~a s ~~`2 s~ . ~ r •sx~~ F ' E NOTE: NEW WATER & SANITARY SERVICE p ~ r. r.~O"' •"3a:C:y(j A ~ 4✓ ;a' .'7 ~k2~ ~ 'SD n~'' JZ ,fix^.if n•~S MC"at~l ~ ~ . .s xuG n ~ " . ~y vr~;, w'~'""' ~ `~l liy a'~cd`,; .9 r a; a , : @.,. . r n~% - ~ C MH CONNECTIONS ~ INSTALLATION TO 3_C" 24'-0" EXISTING REMOVE EXISTING ~ °'r~" r~ F BE PER CITY (REQUIREMENTS ° EXISTING ;n (E) CB DRIVEWAY H N I ~,~r G%x,~i',,~'~,3%?c>"•"s~:xf" ,G'.~~. r /q'"~.r~;V y,~: `:z°& :M;~, ~.r S,d~ r 3 Fd o d ~S, ~s DRIVEWAY CONC CUR65 E) CONC. WALK i ( _ °SGN °SGN ° SCN (E) LS, °SGN °SGN I (E) ~P/LP xr, .~~a ~:~1 <E~~4, aod~f~ . ~"~y~~.. w ~ T 'rte a S(( At. .w4 _ ' j ~VI~.~-` ~ ;V~{~:aP.l',1~j~, :)S 5, ~+,'.%~'v'h. ~~•0i. '"~'~.y. 'iR ~5'v er ~i~NS , M F-~ _ N57°49'381419375' 1--~ ~ _ - - t,. f~~^~zG a a". .'fps a ~?i~ d%~': , NPrx~,+~ T ~ ~ E ~P K°~: e 5'G`aatcl® 5th ' of ~ r xMcOo ai~3s~~,.~~ ~;„s;~ 'x:~s < ~ ~ (E) CB i E .S~ xs;<~,,Eo, s%a' ,a:M~L '.~-•isaZt~¢".' tp , yam. "^'~~i a QC~z^Ik.;~"r... `.(N (Jl ( ) L I; ~`,~t ~rx~t r r~Sl'' '?~y; ~e< ~,rt.;y;i"'~~,'"."",~"Ea ~ 4i E) ~ NEW LS, sAUl~~ay~,~v~~. >'~✓~:~r~ ``f, . ~~..5<°~•~~ i'^`~~> ~ r a , ^.,.~4+z ^~t2~S~PiU;+I C _ _ - _ - k..`"~ : ~ ai'hi ~ $ ?~~Y • Via. ,~.y~,p~ O ~s~. ~ ~ . S~° Ca1 ~GbD •L~1r;• , ~ ~,h~,~,~~.-+ Q .c 8 ~ 6 (E)~ L.S. COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMP COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT • ~,r, a :A. .4 ,~x?,u ,.9M~"~°F ,a»,~ .r„~~$. ur4 nJ 0„ EXTEND UNDER GROUND ~D~ ;r,• ; r°" ~SIY,~!o i rdcac ~ a x ~ ,yp ~:5~~-".x`'?a~~~~~ o (E) Cg 8,_6~, 8,_6„ NEW LS. ~ ~.~~k~r;~7,.,,..M~','e.'i~;?~~«'~''y °w~~ ".MN~,:,..... "~~<>;,~.;x"?, s`.'~ v a '~~h„~4 ELECT, SERVICE LINE ~ ~`-~`"'~~"-^-~M ~ f~ Y7_C LINE Of NEW TYP TYP II W ~ FROM POLE TO BUILDING R 0 W. DEDICATION NEW CONC CURB II o TO MATCH EXISTI °ONC CURB I' (3" CONDUIT 36" DEEP) ~T u rvicZ..._. w.F- 18=6„ TYP i ~ a N ~ NEW PAINTED ~ 'I 3 P~ ~ STRIPES- TYP I v 1 ° I b ~ - o~ New ~ I V i" TYP "'r- ~JITARY~ERV~CE LINE PIPE BOLLARD II i z (TYP ®3) I ~ I ~w 25'- 0" ~ II t n 4 ° SCN F ~ ~ ~ 13 --'25 _ ~ i~, 'oz< 4" WIDE PAINTED ~ N , (E) PAVING STRIPES ©24" 0 C w~ REPAIR A5 REO'D ~ o ~ G~ o G~ I ~b ~ - ~ k: ~ N g~_p~~ (E) CONC CURBS TYP TYP (U N U) 9'-C" ~i REPAIR AS REQ'D T1'P i o v ~ S _t ~I ' ~ a f r. ~ a o ~a ` g r (E} LP ~ ,~O ~ i ~ . f J (E) L.S. 1D i (E) L.S. ~ ro i . r ~J (E) L.S, (E) L.S. v 0 _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ N57°49'38142D75T ~ _ - _ _ E PP IK ~ (2) B E I C 1 1 r 4 . _ „_uy i I - . . I ~r b l 1_ ~ 1 ` 1 - _ .rte ~ i rte.-~-~-~~ - - n ~ ~ 1 t: r ' ~I i L~ ~ ~ S ~i_ ~ ~ ._T - l t f Date: 3-1-2004 SITE DATA File: SD-1 SITE AREA: 21,750 S.F. (0.50 ACRE) Drawn: NT BUILDING AREA: 1,000 S.F. Checked: RRK ANDSCAPE AREA: 3,200 S.F. Sheet IMe PARKING NO.: SITE PLAN REQUIRED: STORAGE= 10 SPACES CAMPUS= 233 SPACES 243 SPACES Sheet Number PROVIDED: TOTAL= 243 SPACES ■ Yr 1 z n 0 Q m r ~ p ~ o V ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ H 0 ~ ~ I~ F ~ ~ ~ ~ m W i O ~ ~ a o ~ 0 . C 0 e i N r a - - - - g ~o \"J 3 u~ ~ ~nj--' O ° F ~ ~ \ ~ ~ W o ~~J~„ ~ ~ o N57°4! ~ M N57°49'38'N 19315' ~ p Ef - _ _ _ '1' ~ m 0 J / ~ W r H I 0 C o Q .°c ~J N ,M I# o A y 14 7 N P' W U W I of Z I XIWy o P f ~ i NEW CONTOUR ~m ~1~ r~ ,~0 f ~ i i ~ ~ i ~ ~i z ~ ~ o , ' ~ EXISTING CONTOURS o~j ;,A o ~ n , ~ ~ ' I / / 'f M ~ ~ Z RAMP-UP PAVING ~ # I y- R ~/W~.~/ , x ~ 175 ~ 0 I r 15 r~q Q ~ ~ ~ N57°49'38'W 207 ST r i r r i i C i i i s I I .n r- r- I~ ~i l J i i y i l Fr 1-s j I. i "i 1 ti Date: 3-1-2004 File: SD-2 Drawn: NT Checked: RRK Sheet Title SITE GRADING PLAN Sheet Number SD■ n z ~ o m V ~ 2 ~ g 0 0 ~ ~ Y W ~ H ~ czi 0 ~ 1 h C17 f ~ fi +u ~ < m ~ n S m o ~ rt (D C r ~ce-r ~n . C NEVV 2" CALIPER RED MAPLE (6 REQUIRED ®+~30'-D" 0 C ) i. (E) CONC, WALK 1 I o L ° N o °SGN N57°49'38'W 193 75' tf = E) CB j o NE (E) F1~ i ~ ~ EXISTING JUNIPER 3 TYP @ PLANTING AREAS ~I LL z 1"~ ~ U ■ _ 7 W SGN r _ t~ ~ i - x°< a N ~i wa o f rb r i.. ~ (E) LP t P EXISTING ARBOR VITA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ - ~_r W r N57°49'38'W2015T _ _ - _ (E) PP ~ uw.a ~ - = _ . ~ i,~ ~y ~ ■ _ t 1 t ~ i Y ~s i i i` ~ ~i i • ■ i i~ i S _ ~ r s~"_ ~ it L' i i i 1 -~w~ Date: 3-1-2004 File: L-1 Drawn: NT Checked: RRK Sheet Title LANDSCAPE PLAN Sheet Number L■ i n z n 0 ¢ m i D z ~ 0 ~ ~ Y W ~ ~g, ~ i h ~ ~ rt W N m ~ n rt A B o 1'- 1'-6" 50' 6 T_~ D n f A ~ 0 LINE OF ROOF OVEI OF ROOF OVER-HANG A'3 0 ABOVE- TYP ~ 3 UE- TYP ~ ~ v ~ W o D. S ~ s. - ~ ~ o 0 o m ~ _ _....r ~ . ,x..n...... _,.:~~,,.:=~x,ew ..z..~, x. _ .~,~..~e... :y _ a a~.. u. a.,a~~. s~.r. ,:ac_... ..tea:-~...~.~ .wu.... ...~.~s, N=' ,t ~ ~ . . Nt ~C' 33'~ I N ~ 3'6"X 48" INSULAT _ IN ALUM FRAME 4u r~- . i (SILL ©48" A F F ; i O ~ cv 3 -4 4 -2 ~ B 0 3~ - ~ SINK 1 A A-2• .a ~ ~g ~ I ~ g =iF ~ I ~ ~ UNISEX A 1L1.KM. s ~ - V C. T FLR ~ \ _I o ~1 t~~ D.S. t ELECT SERVICE 200 A ELECT ENTRY & METER SERVICE PANEL ninr nni i nn _ _ - I"II'C DVLLARV f (TYP ~ 3) P ~ i. • . . - J 8' S 1 r ~ i yt * - - i uate: 3 1-ZUU4 File: A-1 GENERAL NOTES: Drawn: NT DOOR THRESHOLDS SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 1/2". Checked: RRK EDGES SHALL NOT BE BEVELED 1 VERT./2 HORIZ. W/ A MAX. HEIGHT OF 1/4-. Sheet Title ALL DOORS WHICH HAVE LATCH/LOCKSET SHALL HAVE LEVER TYPE OPERATING HARDWARE. FLOOR PLAN PROVIDE ONE 2A10BC EXTINGUISHER IN A VISIABLE LOCATION OF THE SPACE. Sheet Number A■ z D O m i f J ~ ~ ~ ~ H _ ~ ~ r+ W PREFINISHED STANDING SEAM O W (TL ROOF ) ~s G1G ~ ~ " ~ PAINT RED TO MATCH RECTORY y A=3 ~JJ ~ o 2 1 A PREFINISHED MTL. GUTTER B co W~ DOWNSPOUT 20' 50' i N 1 I a 3 ,2 O I ~ Q4 ~ , ~ ~ I i ~i ~ ~ ~ ' II /J/1 I}I} I ~J ~ ~ o Y I I I I I I ~ I) II I I I II II I I I ~ I I /I ~ ~ 1 lr I M I I ,I~i I( ~i ~ I ~ . I I I ~ - I I ~ I ~ ~ ~i I I I I I i ~ ~ i ~ i i I I ~ i 11 I i I i i ~ i i 'i i~ i i I I ~ ~ I I i I ~ I i i I li i I I i I I i I I II ~ I I I I i t I ~ I ~ ~i i l I ~ ~ I I I I I 11 I I t I I I I I I I I I i I I~ I I I ~ I I ~ I I l i I I ~I 1' 1 6 6 1 1' 6" I I ( I I I ~ i i I i i i ~I ~ ~ i I i i - I i i ~ I - ~ , ~ i I ~ i I it ,i i ~ 'I ii i i ~ i ! ~I i I I i' I I i i I' i~ I I~ I i'~ i' 1- l II' ~ I I i i i, I I i I i i I ~ ~ ~i I ~ ~ I I ~ I i I i i i I i I I I ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i, i I ~ ~ i a ~r~_._ I _ ~I I. ~ I ~ ~~~i I i I I i 1 I 1 ~i ~ ~ II I ~I i i ~I I I I I i I 'a I i 1 b ~ I ~ I ~ f I ~ i I ~ I i ~ I I I _ II I ~ O ~ - i ~ ~ i I, I i C I I I I i i 1 ~ i 1 4 ~I I - - ~ i I i i I I. i i I ~ ~ , i I I i i ~ . I, i I i I i i i-. i ~ I I i I 1 ~ i i i I ~ ~ I i r I i i i I i ~ i i I i i I 1 I I i I i i I i ~ I / i i d I I ~ i I I I II i 1 I I I i I I I I I I ~ r I ~ t I i. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~I I i~ ~ .I ~I i' I , I ~ ' ~ ~ I I I I ~ ~ ~ i~ I ~ ~ I I I - I i i I ~ I ,.I I ~ I ii I I ~ i I ~ I I I _ ~ i" I I I I I I ~ ~ I I I ~ ~i ~1` i II I i ~I ii ; I~ I i ~ I I II I I i it i ~ ; I ~i ~ I i~ I I I I ~i~ I I ~I i I i i I I I i I ~ i I~ ~L'1~ L_'~ ~ i - - ~ I I ( i i . FIN FLR I I r~ i i v I ~ I 1 I ~ li li it I 'I I i 4" VERT. WOOD SIDING-TYP PIPE BOLLARD (TYP @ 3) A DOWNSPOUT s WEST ELE~ NORTH ELEVATInN 1 1 Q i rr ~ 2 B I _ 4 I Q I I I i ~I I'~~~~ ~`I~~II i~ i I ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ li ~ Iii i ~il'~I~ i ~ ~ i l~ i I i iil i I 'i I i i i i i ~i ~ I i ~ ~ 11 I i I I ~ i ' I ~ i' ~i ~I i I I lip ~ ~ I' { , I I ~ I I~ ~I i I I I I , I i ii ~ I 1 ~ I i I ~ I i I , i .I ~ ~ 3 6 X 48 INSULATED GLAZING I I, I i , I ~ - i i I I I I I I I I i I M WIN OW f A M. FRA E D N LU i I i I i I i i I i i i i i ~ ~ i i i li i ~ I 1 I -6" A F F , SLL@5' I i i ( ~ 1 i I i i I i I i ~ i I I I I i I I i I I I I ~ 1 I I I I i I i ; ~ I ~ I i I I i I I ~ i i I ~ I I I I I ~i ~ i I ~ ~I i li i i I i I i i I it ~ i I I I I i 1 i i ~ i i W TRIM TYP. I i I OOD ~ ~ ~ I I. I i ~ I I i I ~ ~ I I i I I i i 1 i I I I AT ALL CORNERS i I I I I i i f i~ I I I i ~ I I I V I I.. ~ ~ I I ~ I i ~ ~ I I I I l I I ~I ~ i I 1 i I ~ ~ i I ~ I I I ~ ~ i i i I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ i ~I ~ I ~ ~ _ I I ~ I i TYP i I 4" RT W O S D NG ~ I I VE 0 D ~ i 11 I' i ~ ~ ~ L ~ i I~~ ~ I ~I 'i I I ~ I li I i I; I I I I ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ I I I i I I I ~ ~ I i ~ i ~ i ~ I i i~ i' DOWNSPOUT I i i i i ~ .I I i I I I i 1 ~ ~ i ~I II I I i ~ i i I ~ i ~i I 'i I I~~ I~ I l i i i ~ ~ I I it I I i I ~ I ~ I ~i I,I ii I~ ~ ~ i i ~ I i i lei i I I i i i I ~ i~ ~ I'~~ ~ ~ I I; I I I~ I ~ ~ ~ ~i I I ~ _ I' I ~j, I~ li '~i I ~~I i ~ 1 ~ _ _ . _ _ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~~a'. _ _ - ~ DowNSPOUr ELECTRIC SERVICE & METER c EAST ELEU i c SOUTH ELEVATI®N r ~ ~ ~ 1 f 'L . i~ 24"X36" GYP. BRD. MIRROR GYP. BRD (PAINT) (PAINT) SOAP DISPENSER 48" HIGH t 1/4"~ GRAB ` WAINSCOT-~ BAR- (PROVIDE ' BLOCKING AJ rnp>cRc _ lII - REQUIRED) ~ 3'-6'~ L TOILET PAPER Date: 3-1-2004 DISP. File: A-2 V Drawn: NT WRAP PIPES ~ I N UNDER LAV.- rn z Checked: RRK Sheet Title 6" RUBBER -h'i' BASE - EXTERIOR ELEVATION "A" ELEVATION "B" ELEVATIONS & DETAILS ~ ACCESSIBLE TOILET ROOM ELEVATIONS Sheet Number A_2 ,/a' = l'-0' A■