The URL can be used to link to this page

Hearings Officer Packet - 04/25/2005HEARINGS OFFICER MONDAY - APRIL 25, 2005 - 7:00 PM J Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Hearings Officer meetings by noon on the Friday prior to the meeting. Please call 503-639-4171, Ext. 2438 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments and qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. To request such services, please notify the City of Tigard of your need(s) by 5:00 p.m., no less than one (1) week prior to the meeting date at the same phone numbers listed above so that we can make the appropriate arrangements. Hearings are held in Town Hall at the City of Tigard at 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Staff reports are available to the public 7 days prior to the hearing date 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC HEARING 2.1 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF TIGARD EXPANSION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2004-00005 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2005-00005 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2005-00006 DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2005-00016 REQUEST: The applicant is seeking approval for a three-phased expansion. Phase 1 consists of new on site parking for 134 cars. No new access to Gaarde Street is proposed with this phase, but sensitive lands reviews are required for the drainageway and step slopes present on site. Phase 2 consists of a new two-story, 4,450 square foot addition between the existing church and ministry buildings. This phase will also reconfigure the existing parking lot to provide access to the new addition, closing the existing access on SW Gaarde Street, and constructing a new access from Gaarde Street to the new parking lot in Phase 1. An adjustment to the 600 foot access spacing standards is required. Phase 3 consists of a new two story 18,000 square foot multi purpose gymnasium building. With this phase, the 2,300 square foot "Bolt Hall" will be demolished and replaced by an additional 47 parking spaces. LOCATION: 11075 SW Gaarde Street, WCTM 1S103DC Lot 01100. ZONE: R-3.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. are permitted ~ ~.on nlul~a.,ditional1.. - -A ;-4-4. .ao......1 ~ -I-- ...;"-A icc~. uNicnc~ are ny. G`vunlc t.IVK, C311U lilauLuuV1101 usei are 010V PU1111Iucu conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. 3. OTHER BUSINESS 4. ADJOURNMENT Page 1 of 1 Depending on the number of people wishing to testify, the Tigard Hearing's Officer may limit the amount of time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Hearing's Officer may further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Hearing's Officer to supplement oral testimony. AGENDA ITEM NO.: 2.1 DATE: APRIL 25, 2005 PAGE 1 OFD FILE NAME: FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF TIGARD EXPANSION CASE NOS.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2004-00005 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2005-00005 & 6 DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2005-00016 IF YOU WISH TO TESTIFY ON THE ITEM INDICATED ABOVE, PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME, ADDRESS & INCLUDE YOUR ZIP CODE PROPONENT - (Speaking In Favor or Neutral) OPPONENT- Name, Address, Code and Phone NQ.,~ Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. Name, Addr/~ss, Co/de and Phone No. Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. Sew ~3 g6F-66 r' L7 tF~5 Y,/ U) Name, Address, Zip Cod nd Phone No. Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. W I' Lsa►J !mot 3r7 5, G✓- qo -rlGort-d cil2-?moo 1 _ Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. -TName, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. ,e..dZ So v S S• w . Cf.~,~. T r S ~ u 2, q. -7 2- - - - - - - - - - 'ame, Addpss, :p Code and Phone No I Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. 11 z s s w • GA.rv~i e- S~ d:24, . 72-2 Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. ot-1C,n ev- P502 ►12q Sw Gt View - i~~~rd•oz ~t~2z3--- - I • NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE LIENALDER, VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER CITY OF TIGARD CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE wevewpment tterCommunity [[NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDPRIL 25. 2005 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER AT 13125 HAOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NOS.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2004-00005 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW SLR 2005-00005 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW SLR 2005-00006 DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENT AR) 2005-00016 FILE TITLE: FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF TIGARD APPLICANT: Architect LA OWNER: The First Baptist Church of Tigard Attn: Larry Abell 11075 SW Gaarde Street 805 SE Sherman Street Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97214 REQUEST: The applicant is seeking Conditional Use Permit approval for a'=.three-phased expansion. Phase 1 consists of new on site parking for 134 cars. No new access to SW Gaarde Street. is proposed with this phase, but Sensitive Lands Reviews are required for the dramageway and step slopes present on site. Phase 2 consists of a new two-story 4,450 square foot addition between the existing church and ministrryy buildings. This phase will also reconfigure the existing parking lot to provide access to the new addition, closing the existing access on Gaarde Street, and constructing a new access from Gaarde Street to the new parking lot in Phase 1. An Adjustment to the 600-foot access spacing standards is required. Phase .3 consists of a new two-story 18,000 square foot multi urpose gymnasium building. With this phase, the 2,300 square foot "Bolt Hall" will be demolished and replaced by an additional 47 parking spaces. LOCATION: 11075 SW Gaarde Street; WCTM 2S103DC, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: R-3.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or wi#no'ut accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 2438 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION LESS THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AN OPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25c) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25~) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MORGAN TRACY AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223, OR BY E-MAIL TO COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS 1325 SW Coster ON, Portland, OR 97219 • PO Box 370 • Beaverton, OR 97075 Phone: 503-084-0309 fax: 503-820-3433 Email: legaladverOsiog@eommoewspopers.oom AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION State of Oregon, County of Washington, SS I, Charlotte Allsop, being the first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Accounting Manager of The Times (serving Tigard, Tualatin & Sherwood), a newspaper of general circulation, published at Beaverton, in the aforesaid county and state, as defined by ORS 193.010 and 193.020, that City of Tigard - Public Hearing Notice First Baptist Church of Tigard - CUP2004- 00005; SLR2005-00005 & 6; VAR2005-00016 CNI TT10567 a copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for successive and consecutive weeks in the following issues April 7, 2005 Uwvo* oj-uqo Charlotte Allsop (Accounting M nager) Subscribed and sworn to before me this • April 7, 5 OFFICIAL SEAL ROBIN A BURGESS NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO. 344589 NOTARY PUBL C FOR O GON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 16.2005 My commission expires Acct # 10093001 City of Tigard Attn: Accounts Payable 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Size Amount Due $_j3.1D ' remit to address above oe COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS 1325 SW Color Oft, ParOaod, OR 97219 • PO Boa 370 • Beavulon, OR 97075 Ppooa: 503-004-03001 & 501020.3433 Email: legaladuep6fmg@comamewspapers.com AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION State of Oregon, County of Washington, SS I, Charlotte Allsop, being the first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Accounting Manager of The Times (serving Tigard, Tualatin & Sherwood), a newspaper of general circulation, published at Beaverton, in the aforesaid county and state, as defined by ORS 193.010 and 193.020, that City of Tigard - Public Hearing Notice First Baptist Church of Tigard - CUP2004- 00005; SLR2005-00005 & 6; VAR2005-00016 CNI TT10567 a copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for successive and consecutive weeks in the following issues April 7, 2005 afti/G047k OJU4~p Charlotte Allsop (Accounting M nager) Subscribed and sworn to before me this April 7, 2005 NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON My commission expires Acct # 10093001 City of Tigard Attn: Accounts Payable 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Size 1Gj 1 Amount Due $~,7a 'remit to address above 0 0 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The following will be considered by the Tigard Hearings Officer on Monday April 25, 2005 at 7:00 PM at the Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. Both public oral and written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the Tigard Municipal Code and the rules of procedure adopted by the Council and available at City Hall or the rules of procedure set forth in Chapter 18.390. Testimony may be submitted in writing prior to or at the public hearing or verbally at the public hearing only. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior to the close of the hearing accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to afford the decision-maker an opportunity to respond to the issue precludes appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeal based on that issue. Failure to specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven (7) days prior to the hearing, and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Divisrun (,staff contact: Morgan Tracy) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, by calling 503-639-4171, or by e-mail Io CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2004-00005/ SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2005-00005 & 6/ DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2005-00016 REQUEST: The applicant is seeking Conditional Use Permit approval for a three-phased expansion. Phase 1 consists of new on site parking for 134 cars. No new access to SW Gaarde Street is proposed•with ,this phase,,but Sensitive Lands Reviews are required for the drainageway and step slopes present on site. Phase 2 consists of a new two-story 4,450 square foot addition between the existing church and ministry buildings. This phase will also reconfigure the existing parking lot to provide access to the new addition, closing the existing access on Gaarde Street, and constructing a new access from Gaarde Street to the new parking lot in Phase 1. An Adjustment to the 600-foot access spacing standards is required. Phase 3 consists of a new two-story 18,000 square foot multi purpose gymnasium building. With this phase, the 2,300 square foot "Bolt Hall" will be demolished and replaced by an additional 47 parking spaces. LOCATION: 11075 SW Gaarde Street; WCTM 2S103DC, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: R-3.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. TT 10567 Publish April 7, 2005 BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by Larry Abel on behalf of the) Tigard First Baptist Church for a conditional use permit) and other approvals to expand an existing church at ) 11075 SW Gaarde Street in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) A. SUMMARY FINAL ORDER CUP 2004-000051 (Tigard First Baptist Church) 1. The applicant, Tigard First Baptist Church represented by Larry Abel, requests approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for expansion of an existing church, located at 11075 SW Gaarde Street; also known as tax lot 01100, WCTM 2S103DC. The site is the southwest quadrant of the intersection of SW 110th Avenue and Gaarde Street. The site is zoned R-3.5 (Low Density Residential). The site is currently developed with a roughly 6630 square foot church, 3564 square foot ministry building and a 2300 square foot "Bolt Hall," 134 automobile parking spaces and landscaping. The applicant requests sensitive lands reviews for impacts to the drainageway and steep slopes on site. SLR2005-00005 and SLR2005-00006. The applicant proposes to construct a 22,500 square foot expansion of the existing church and associated parking in three phases. a. In Phase 1 the applicant proposed to construct a new 134-space parking lot in the east and south portions of the site, including a new access to SW 110th Avenue. b. In Phase 2 the applicant proposed to construct a new 4450 square foot two-story, addition between the existing church and ministry buildings, replacing a portion of the existing parking lot, reconfigure the existing parking lot to provide access to the new addition and relocate the existing driveway on Gaarde Street to the south. c. In Phase 3 the applicant proposed to demolish "Bolt Hall" and construct a new 18,000 square foot two-story multi purpose gymnasium building southeast of the Phase 2 addition. The applicant will also construct an additional 47 parking spaces near the center of the site. 2. The applicant also requests an adjustment to reduce the 600-foot intersection spacing requirements on Gaarde Street to 130 feet to relocate an existing driveway. VAR2005-00016. 3. City Hearings Officer Joe Turner (the "hearings officer") held a duly noticed public hearing regarding the application. City staff recommended that the hearings officer approve the CUP and Sensitive Lands Reviews, subject to conditions. Staff recommended the hearings officer deny the adjustment request. See the Staff Report to the Hearings Officer dated April 18, 2005 (the "Staff Report"). The applicant's representative accepted the findings and conditions of approvals recommended by City staff with certain 1 This decision also addresses SLR2005-00005, SLR2005-00006 and VAR2005-00016. • • exception. One person testified orally and in writing in support of the application. Two other persons testified orally with questions and concerns. The hearings officer held open the public record for one week to allow the applicant to submit a final argument. The principal disputed issues in this case include the following: a. Whether the proposed development will generate excessive noise, lights, pollution and other impacts on abutting residential properties that cannot be adequately mitigated; b. Whether the applicant sustained the burden of proof that the proposed adjustment to the intersection spacing requirements complies with the applicable approval criteria in TDC 18.370.020.C(5)(b); and c. Whether the applicant can be required to ensure that adequate sight distance is available at the intersection of 110`" Avenue and Gaarde Street. 4. In this final order, the hearings officer approves the conditional use permit and sensitive lands review based on the findings and conclusions provided and incorporated herein and subject to conditions at the end of this final order. The hearings officer denies the adjustment. B. HEARING AND RECORD HIGHLIGHTS 1. The hearings officer received testimony at the public hearing about this application on April 25, 2005. All exhibits and records of testimony are filed with the Tigard Department of Community Development. At the beginning of the hearing, the hearings officer made the declaration required by ORS 197.763. The hearings officer disclaimed any ex parte contacts, bias or conflicts of interest. The following is a summary by the hearings officer of selected testimony offered at the public hearing in this matter. 2. City planner Morgan Tracy summarized the Staff Report. a. He noted that the applicant's narrative is inconsistent with the development and tree removal plans regarding which trees will be removed and retained. Condition of approval 4 require that the applicant submit a revised tree removal plan that clearly identifies which trees will be removed and retained. He noted that the applicant will plant additional trees and shrubs on the site, including 10 douglas fir trees within the stream buffer, which will enhance the existing stream buffer and mitigate impacts on abutting residents to the south. b. He noted that there is an existing bike/pedestrian path easement on the southern portion of the site. The proposed development encroaches into a portion of the path. The applicant has proposed to dedicate a blanket pathway easement over the entire sensitive area to compensate for impacts to the existing path easement. However construction of a path within the sensitive area will impose additional costs on the City. Therefore the applicant should be required to retain the existing easement or obtain any required approvals and construct the portion of the pathway in the realigned easement. CUP 2004-00005 Hearings Officer Final Order (Tigard First Baptist Church) Page 2 • • c. He testified that the applicant did submit a lighting plan for the site. However staff have not had an opportunity to review the plan in detail. Therefore he requested the hearings officer retain condition of approval 3. d. He testified that the proposed development does not provide enough off- street parking to comply with the Code. The applicant is required to provide 185 parking spaces and 6 ADA accessible spaces. The applicant should be required to demonstrate that adequate parking, including ADA accessible spaces, is available to accommodate each phase of the proposed development. This is required by condition 2.D. e. He recommended the hearings officer deny the proposed adjustment to the intersection spacing requirements. He argued that adequate alternative access points available on 110 Avenue. Therefore the adjustment request does not comply with TDC 18.370.020.C(5)(b)(2). f. He testified that the applicant is not required to provide a separate drainage tract. g. He argued that the applicant should be required to demonstrate that adequate sight distance is available at the intersection of 110 Avenue and Gaarde Street. Proportionality is irrelevant to this safety issue. Ii. He requested that the hearings officer allow emergency vehicle access to Gaarde Street if required by the Tualatin Valley Fire District. 3. Architect Larry Abel, civil engineer Carl Jensen, traffic engineer Frank Charbonneau and project manager Jim Wilson testified for the applicant. a. Mr. Abel submitted a revised site plan dated April 25, 2005, with revised phasing. The applicant reversed proposed phases 2 and 3 to allow the applicant to construct the gymnasium first, as Phase 2. He accepted the findings and conditions of approval in the Staff Report with certain exceptions. i. He testified that the applicant will retain the existing trail easement on the site. The applicant will revise the design of the lower parking lot to avoid impacts to the easement. ii. He testified that the applicant will design the parking lots to ensure that a sufficient number of off-street parking spaces are available to serve the development proposed in each individual phase. iii. He testified that the applicant will try to save as many existing trees on the site as possible. The applicant's engineer will review the design and location of the existing sanitary sewer line during final engineering to determine if it can accommodate the proposed expansion. However the applicant may need to lower the sewer line to serve the proposed development, which could impact trees within the sensitive area. The applicant will not remove trees or other vegetation within the stream buffer unless it is absolutely necessary. The applicant will also save as many trees as possible on the upland portion of the site. The applicant will plant additional trees throughout the site. CUP 2004-00005 Hearings Officer Final Order Tigard First Baptist Church) Page 3 • • iv. He requested the hearings officer approve the adjustment to allow the applicant to maintain direct driveway access to Gaarde Street. The Gaarde Street driveway allows traffic generated by the church to disperse onto area streets, reducing the traffic impact on 110th Avenue and the adjacent residential neighborhood. The applicant will relocate the existing driveway to the south to improve the intersection spacing on this street. The site does not have enough frontage on Gaarde Street to comply with the 600-foot spacing requirement. The church generates traffic on Sunday mornings. It does not generate traffic during normal peak hours. v. He requested that the hearings officer modify conditions of approval 13 and 29 to limit the applicant's duty to improve sight distance at the intersection of I I01h Avenue and Gaarde Street to removal of obstructions on the site or a within the public right of way. The applicant has no control over the properties north of the intersection and has no right to remove vegetation or structures on private property that may limit sight distance at this intersection. vi. He testified that the applicant will treat and detain stormwater within a portion of the site. The applicant will not create a separate tract for the drainage facilities. He requested the hearings officer modify conditions 17 and 21 to that effect. b. Mr. Jensen testified that there is a question about the depth of the existing sanitary sewer line on the site. The applicant may need to lower the sewer line to serve the proposed expansion, which may impact trees within the sensitive area. The applicant will restore the disturbed area and mitigate any impacts by planting additional vegetation on the site. i. He testified that the applicant will collect stormwater runoff from impervious areas on the site, treat it in a bio-filtration swale to remove pollutants and discharge it onto the ground outside of the stream buffer, allowing the treated runoff to flow overland to the creek. ii. He testified that the applicant will plant additional landscaping throughout the site to provide a buffer between the site and adjacent homes. The applicant will replace all of the existing parking lot lights with cut-off fixtures, which limit off-site glare. c. Mr. Charbonneau testified that all affected intersections, including the proposed Gaarde Street driveway, will continue to operate at Level Of Service ("LOS") B or C with the proposed expansion. Sight distance is more than adequate, based on the 35 mph speed limit on Gaarde. i. He testified that the Gaarde Street driveway will improve circulation and emergency access on the site. Elimination of the Gaarde Street driveway will create a roughly 700-foot long dead-end. Eliminating the Gaarde Street driveway will increase the traffic impact on the 110th Avenue/Gaarde Street intersection and the abutting neighborhood, because all of the traffic from the site will exit onto 110th Avenue. CUP 2004-00005 Hearings Officer Final Order (Tigard First Baptist Church) Page 4 d. Mr. Wilson testified that the applicant will not operate a school on the site. He testified that improvements to Gaarde Street made the existing Gaarde Street driveway unusable by emergency vehicles. The City proposed to "work with" the applicant to fix the problem when they developed the expansion. Now the City is denying any access to Gaarde Street. 4. Bruce Anderson testified in support of the applications. He argued that the applicant should be allowed to provide driveway access to Gaarde Street. 5. Julie Piesker expressed concern that closure of the Gaarde Street access will increase traffic volume and congestion on 110th Avenue. She noted that the 110th Avenue/Gaarde Street intersection is not signalized. She argued that the applicant could limit use of the Gaarde Street driveway to Sunday only. 6. Greg Herkner expressed concern that expansion of the parking lot will increase the amount of pollution entering the creek near the south boundary of the site. He objected to removal of the existing trees on the site. The trees buffer his home from lights, noise and other impacts generated on the site. 7. City engineer Kim McMillan testified that Gaarde Street is an arterial. The City requires a minimum 600 feet between intersections on arterials to avoid conflicting turn movements and to maintain traffic flow. Arterials are intended to carry through traffic at higher speeds. Additional access points conflict with that purpose and may create a hazard. The applicant has, or will have, two driveways onto 110th Avenue, which are adequate to serve the use. Although closure of the Gaarde Street driveway will increase traffic on 110th Avenue, traffic is generally limited to Sunday mornings. The City considered allowing a right-in/right-out only access onto Gaarde. However a median would conflict with the driveway serving the development across the street. In addition, such a driveway would still require an adjustment for which the applicant cannot meet the approval criteria. She testified that the City is required to restore existing driveways when it constructs street improvements. However the City can require closure of existing driveways as a condition of approval for new development. 8. City Planning Manager Dick Bewersdorff testified that City capital improvement staff failed to check with City engineering staff before they agreed to work with the applicant to relocate the existing Gaarde Street driveway. The Code does not allow the proposed Gaarde Street access and capital improvement staff have no authority to allow such access. 9. At the end of the hearing, the hearings officer ordered the public record held open for one week for the applicant to submit a closing argument. The record in this case closed at 5 PM on May 2, 2005. C. DISCUSSION 1. City staff provided basic facts about the site and its vicinity and existing and proposed uses in the Staff Report. Ultimately they recommended that the hearings officer CUP 2004-00005 Hearings Officer Final Order (Tigard First Baptist Church) Page 5 • approve the applications for the conditional use permit and sensitive lands reviews and deny the adjustment application. The applicant accepted most of the findings and recommended conditions with the exceptions described more below. The hearings officer adopts the findings and conclusions in the Staff Report as his own except to the extent they are inconsistent with the findings and discussion in this final order. 2. Regarding the conditional use permit, substantial evidence in the record shows that the proposed use does or can comply with the applicable standards for a conditional use permit. That evidence and those findings were not rebutted. The hearings officer relies on the Staff Report for relevant findings and citation to supporting evidence on these issues. The hearings officer is persuaded that the proposed use will not generate excessive noise, lights, pollution and other effects that cannot be adequately mitigated. These impacts can be accommodated considering the size, shape, location, topography and natural features of the site. a. Parking, maneuvering and other activities occurring within the parking lot will generate some noise. However such impacts are short term, as vehicles enter and leave the site. In addition, the parking lot will be physically separated from abutting residential properties by the existing vegetative buffer along the stream. The applicant will plant additional vegetation within the buffer and throughout the site, which will enhance the existing buffer. See Plan Sheet L 1. Therefore the hearings officer finds that activities in the parking lot are unlikely to have a significant adverse impact on surrounding residents. b. The hearings officer finds that lights in the parking lot are unlikely to cause glare or adverse visual impacts off-site, because of the distance and vegetation between the light fixtures and residences. Excessive lighting can be addressed by conditions of approval that limit the level of lighting at the property line and require light fixtures to be designed, situated and/or supplemented so they do not cast significant off- sight glare. Also conditions can provide that lights not required for security purposes should be turned off when there are no scheduled activities at the temple. A condition of approval is warranted requiring lighting to be as described herein. It is feasible for the applicant to produce a final site plan showing light fixtures, specifications for fixtures and a lighting plan (including calculated light levels at the property line) to comply with such a condition. For purposes of this decision, lighting does not cause adverse impacts if it casts not more than one foot-candle at the property line or if it is shielded to prevent light from being cast away from the building on which it is situated or toward the east or southeast. Condition of approval 3 should be modified to that effect. c. The proposed development will create additional paved parking areas located in close proximity to the creek. Stormwater flowing over these paved parking areas will pickup oil, sediment and other pollutants, which could contaminate the creek. However the applicant proposed to collect runoff from impervious areas and discharge it to a biofiltration swale, which will remove much of the pollutants. The applicant will discharge the treated runoff onto the ground, where it will flow over the ground and through additional vegetation, which will filter out additional pollutants before it reaches the creek. CUP 2004-00005 Hearings Officer Final Order (Tigard First Baptist Church) Page 6 • • d. There is no substantial evidence in the record that stormwater treatment and erosion control facilities will not function as designed or will cause pollution or sedimentation of adjacent properties or the creek. Neighbors' evidence about pollution from other sites is not relevant to this application. There is no evidence that similar conditions exist on the site or that failures will or are probable on this site. e. The proposed church expansion will attract additional people to the immediate area, which may lead to an incremental increase the amount of litter, vandalism, and illegal activities. However the hearings officer finds that there is no substantial evidence in the record that members of the church are any more or less likely to engage in nuisance or illegal activities than other people or that such effects will result from the church. 3. The applicant requested an adjustment to the intersection spacing standards of TDC 18.705.030.H(3) to allow driveway access to Gaarde Street. a. TDC 18.705.030.H(3) requires a minimum 600 feet between driveway and street intersections on arterials such as Gaarde Street. The applicant's existing Gaarde Street access is located roughly 80 feet from the intersection of SW 110th Avenue and SW Gaarde Street. The applicant proposed to close the existing access and construct a new driveway onto Gaarde Street located roughly 200 feet south of the 110th Avenue/SW Gaarde Street intersection. b. TDC 18.370.020.C(5) authorizes the hearings officer to approve an adjustment to the intersection spacing requirements if the application complies with the approval criteria of TDC 18.370.020.C(5)(b). In this case the hearings officer finds that the applicant failed to bear the burden of proof that the application complies with TDC 18.370.020.C5)(b)(2) and (4), because adequate alternative access is available to the site from SW 110t Avenue. Therefore the proposed adjustment cannot be approved, because it does not comply with the applicable approval criteria. c. Prohibiting access to Gaarde Street will increase the traffic volume and congestion on 110th Avenue and the proposed site driveways, since all vehicles must use the driveways onto this street to enter and leave the site. The additional traffic and congestion will likely be perceptible to area residents and church members. but it will not exceed the capacity of streets or create a hazard based on Mr. Charbonneau's expert testimony. There is no substantial evidence to the contrary. i. Mr. Charbonneau testified at the hearing that routing all of the traffic from the site will not exceed the capacity of the 110th Avenue/Gaarde Street intersection. In his April 27, 2005 Memorandum he testified that elimination of the Gaarde Street driveway will cause "several detriments... "2 However he did not find that 2 He testified that closure of the Gaarde Street driveway will cause "[a]dditional impacts to the [I I CP Avenue/Gaarde Street] intersection and I I& Avenue... longer delays in accessing the site... emergency vehicles will need to undertake a longer route... [and] the residential neighborhood ...will experience additional traffic circulation and impacts." CUP 2004-00005 Hearings Officer Final Order (Tigard First Baptist Church) Page 7 • 0 those "detriments" will violate City standards or create a hazard. A mere increase in delay and congestion is not sufficient to support a finding that the alternative access is unavailable. d. The proposed parking lot design without access to Gaarde Street will create a long dead-end parking lot and vehicle accessway. This dead-end access way could increase emergency response times and restrict emergency vehicle access to certain portions of the site, as Mr. Charbonneau noted in his April 27, 2005 Memorandum. Therefore the hearings officer finds that the applicant should be required to provide an emergency vehicle access to Gaarde Street if required by the Tualatin Valley Fire District. A condition of approval is warranted to that effect. e. The fact that the Church will generate the majority of its traffic on Sundays, when traffic volumes on Gaarde Street are lower is irrelevant, because it does not relate to the applicable approval criteria in TDC 18.370.020.C(5)(b). f. The existence of other driveways on Gaarde Street that do not meet the intersection spacing requirements is irrelevant. The City has no authority to close existing nonconforming driveways. However the City can require that the applicant close its existing driveway and bring the site into compliance with current standards as a condition of development approval. 4. The applicant is required to demonstrate that adequate sight distance is available at the intersection of 110th Avenue and Gaarde Street, based on the posted speed of 35 mph or the 85t percentile, whichever is greater. The applicant is required to modify the intersection if necessary to provide adequate sight distance. See conditions of approval 13 and 29. All of the traffic from the proposed development will travel through this intersection. Therefore the hearings officer finds that this condition is "[n]ecessary to ensure the use is compatible with other use in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding uses and public facilities is minimized." TDC 18.330.030.B. Inadequate sight distance at this intersection will create a hazard and additional traffic generated by the proposed development will exacerbate the hazard. Therefore the applicant should be required to ensure that adequate sight distance is available. 5. The applicant is not required to provide a separate tract for the stormwater facility. The conditions of approval should be modified to that effect. 6. The hearings officer finds that the applicant should be allowed to modify the phasing sequence as proposed at the hearing, provided the applicant demonstrates that adequate parking and landscaping are provided for each phase. D. CONCLUSIONS The hearings officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit and sensitive lands reviews do or can comply with the applicable approval criteria and standards of the Tigard Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to ensure such compliance occurs. The hearings officer further finds that the applicant failed to bear the burden of proof that the adjustment complies with the applicable approval criteria and must be denied. CUP 2004-00005 Hearings Officer Final Order (Tigard First Baptist Church) Page 8 • • E. DECISION The hearings officer hereby denies VAR2005-00016 and approves CUP 2004- 00005, SLR2005-00005 and SLR2005-00006 (Tigard First Baptist Church) as described herein, subject to the following conditions of approval: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ANY SITE WORK (ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT): The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION, ATTN: MORGAN TRACY 503-639-4171, EXT 2428. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: Prior to any site work, the applicant shall revise the landscape plans to show: A. Consistency between the proposed tree removal plan, site plan, and landscape plan with regard to tree removal and on site walkway locations. B. Additional vegetative screening along the west side of the lower parking lot. Any plantings that are proposed in the drainageway buffer will need to be native species appropriate for the area, per CWS standards. C. The extent of landscaping that will be provided for each phase. This is to assist inspection staff in determining when the landscape is complete prior to final inspection for each respective phase. Areas that will be graded or disturbed shall be replanted with groundcover to prevent erosion. D. Trees in the parking lots and street trees as native species. The applicant shall consult with the City Forester to determine the species to be used. 2. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall revise the site/utility plans to show: A. The water quality facility shall be redesigned with input from both the applicant's engineer and arborist, to establish a location that can accommodate the required treatment and detention, and maintain the existing trees. B. Either a) revise the site plan to show no encroachments including structures, grading, or planted vegetation occurring in the existing pathway easement area or b) propose and construct a realigned pathway in a new easement location. If proposing a realignment, the applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any other required approvals, such as sensitive lands review and CWS sign off, if the pathway is in the dramageway area. C. A note indicating the height of the masonry trash enclosure will be 6 feet minimum. D. The parking lot will comply with the Oregon Uniform Building Code by providing seven (7) ADA accessible spaces. This number may be reduced to 6 if the total parking provided is fewer than 200 spaces. The applicant shall additionally demonstrate that the minimum parking is provided for each phase after the appropriate number of ADA spaces are provided. E. The number of bicycle rack spaces to be provided in each location. A minimum of 14 spaces are required for phase 1 and 2, and 28 spaces are required at the completion of Phase 3. F. An area for a loading area. Staff suggests that the area in the Phase 2 parking lot turnaround be shown for this purpose. CUP 2004-00005 Hearings Officer Final Order (Tigard First Baptist Church) Page 9 i G. The specific profile for the sewer line, as it passes through the sensitive area. The applicant will need to obtain explicit approval from CWS regarding the sewer line work in this area, or else revise their plan such that no work in the buffer is required. If work in the buffer area is allowed, alternate methods of constructing the line will be required to be explored to minimize or eliminate the need for tree removal before the city grants approval to remove these trees. Moreover, prior to removing any trees in the sensitive land area, a tree removal permit shall be obtained from the City. 3. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall submit a detailed lighting plan prepared or approved by a professional engineer or other qualified individual showing that the light fixtures on the site do not cast more than one foot-candle at the property lines abutting the site. Light fixtures shall be designed, situated and/or supplemented to prevent them from causing significant off-site glare. Lights shall comply with crime prevention requirements of the Tigard Development Code (TDC) Section 18.360.090(10). 4. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall submit a revised tree removal plan that clearly depicts the trees that will be removed and those that will be retained, and includes the following notations: A. The applicant shall notify the City Arborist when tree protection measures are in place so that he may verify that the measures will function properly pprior to construction. B. If it is necessary to enter the tree protection zone at any time with equipment (trucks, bulldozers, etc.) the project arborist and City Forester must be notified before any entry occurs. Before entering the TPZ, the project arborist and City Forester shall determine the method by which entry can occur, along with any additional tree protection measures. 5. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall have the geotech engineer review and approve the construction plans for the City's review and approval. 6. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall provide evidence of all necessary approvals from US Army Corps of Engineers and the Division of State Lands. If no approvals are required, the applicant shall submit a letter stating the reasons why no approval is required. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, ATTN: KIM MCMILLAN 503-639-4171, EXT 2642. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 7. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover half street improvements and any other work in uic Yuviic iir,11L-01-way.01n kV) b%-,Lb vi ucLaiicu Puuiic itiiproveiiieu~ 1aiib biiaLi uo submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these pans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). 8. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the `Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public CUP 2004-00005 Hearings Officer Final Order (Tigard First Baptist Church) Page 10 • • improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 9. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 10. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of Gaarde to increase the right-of-way to 38 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 11. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department as a part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, which indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of 1101 Avenue. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a local street from curb to centerline equal to 16 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. surface and/or subsurface runoff, 5 foot concrete sidewalk with a 5-foot planter strip; street trees in the planter strip spaced per TDC requirements; street striping; streetlight layout by applicant's engineer underground utilities; street signs (if applicable); driveway apron (if applicable); and adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal Avenue in a safe manner, as approved by to be approved by City Engineer; alignment to construct SW 110th the Engineering Department. 12. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department as a part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, indicating that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW Gaarde Street as a part of this project: A. removal of the existing driveway, replacing it with curb and sidewalk; B. street trees spaced per TDC requirements; and C. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer. 13. The applicant's engineer shall provide preliminary sight distance certification for the intersection of 110 Avenue and Gaarde Street, with a list of improvements required v meet the standard. The engineer shall use the posted speed of 35 mph or the 85 percentile, whichever is greater. CUP 2004-00005 (Tigard First Baptist Church) Hearings Officer Final Order Page II • • 14. Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans. A connection permit is required for the reconnection of the sewer lateral to the main after lowering the lateral. 15. The applican t's engineer shall revise stormwater detention and water quality calculations with the actual impervious surface areas as reflected on Sheet Al. 16. Any extension of public water lines shall be shown on the proposed Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit construction drawings and shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Water Department, as a part of the Engineering Department plan review. NOTE: An estimated 12% of the water system costs must be on deposit with the Water Department prior to approval of the PFI permit plans from the Engineering Department and construction of public water lines. 17. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 18. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention an Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition." 19. The applicant shall obtain a 1200-C General Permit issued by the City of Tigard pursuant to ORS 468.740 and the Federal Clean Water Act. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION, ATTN: MORGAN TRACY 503-639-4171, EXT 2428. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 20. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/owner shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any existing tree greater than 12" diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. 21. Prior to any site work, the area of the drainage facility must be clearly identified in the field with permanent fencing so as to insure no grading or material is placed in A A r A 1 1 > 1 1_ A this area. tiny fencing that is damaged during construction must De replaced prior to final building inspection. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, ATTN: HIM MCMILLAN 503-639-4171, EXT 2642. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 22. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). CUP 2004-00005 Hearings Officer Final Order (Tigard First Baptist Church) Page 12 • • THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION, ATTN: MORGAN TRACY 503-639-4171, EXT 2428. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 23. Prior to the issuance of final occupancy on any building, the applicant must provide City staff with a letter indicating that all of the provisions of Clean Water Services service provider letter (#4097) have been complied with. 24. Prior to the issuance of final occupancy on any building, re-plant any area where vegetation has been removed as a result of grading in conformance with the Clean Water Services Standards. 25. The applicant shall comply with the protection measures prescribed by the City Arborist. The applicant shall provide the City Arborist with a construction sequence including installation and removal of tree protection devices, clearing, grading, and paving. 26. Prior to final building inspection, the Project Arborist shall submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy, stable and viable in their modified growing environment. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, ATTN: KIM MCMILLAN 503-639-4171, EXT 2642. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 27. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 28. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) 3 mil mylar, 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable, and 3) the as-built drawings shall be tied to the City's GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). 29. The applicant's engineer shall provide final sight distance certification for the intersection of 110 Avenue/Gaarde Street and the driveways on 110' Avenue. Final sight distart,ce certification will be required for the Phase 1 (existing) driveway on 110 Avenue and the intersection prior to final building inspection of Phase 1. Final sight distance certification will be required for the Phase 2 (proposed) driveway on 110'h Avenue prior to final building inspection of Phase 2. 30. The existing driveway on Gaarde shall be removed prior to final inspection on Phase 1. CUP 2004-00005 Hearings Officer Final Order (Tigard First Baptist Church) Page 13 • • 31. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 110th Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $21,000.00 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. 32. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for complian ce with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 36 MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION SHALL RENDER THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION VOID. DATED this 12th day of May, 2005. Joe Turner, Esq., AICP City of Tigard Land Use Hearings Officer CUP 2004-00005 Hearings Officer Final Order (Tigard First Baptist Church) Page 14 "TAB All Testimony Received at the Public Hearing. R. ' Y. July 15, 2005 Morgan Tracy, Staff Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Morgan, RECEIVED PLANNING JUL- 18 2005 CITY OF TIGARD Enclosed please find my letter to the City Council in support of the request for variance VAR 2005-00016 for Tigard First Baptist Church. Please place this letter before the City Council at least 7 days prior to the continued hearing. call if you have any questions. n rely. E. my 14111S o West 120th Pla Tigard, re on 97224 (503) 793-0658 • • July 10, 2005 Tigard City Council City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Letter in support of Appeal of Hearings Officer's Decision First Baptist Church of Tigard (VAR) 2005-00016 Dear City Council Members, RECEIVED PLANNING JUL,1 8 2005 CITY OF TIGARD My name is Gary Henry and my family and I reside at 14111 SW 120th Place, Tigard, Oregon. I have lived in Tigard for over eight years and my home is just off of SW Gaarde St. and a very short distance from Tigard First Baptist Church. I am not a member of the church. I want to first thank each of you for your service to the city and community of Tigard. I also want to thank you for the opportunity and privilege to express my opinion to the council on the matter of the church's driveway access to SW Gaarde St. I have read and studied the findings of the hearings officer and I believe that I have a reasonable understanding of the issues involved. I understand that there is, what I will refer to throughout this letter as, a 600 foot rule. The problem as I understand it is that the church is unable to move their Gaarde St. driveway 600 feet away from the intersection of 110th and Gaarde St. because they do not have enough property along Gaarde. I do understand that they are willing to move it as far away from the subject intersection as-possible, which is around 220 feet. I have walked to the sight and can see that the sight distance is over 400 feet in both directions from the proposed location of the driveway. My understanding is that in a speed zone of 35 miles per hour the required sight distance is 386 feet. Moreover, most of the church's traffic will occur on Sundays when the traffic flow is traditionally lighter than week days. The church's request is not only very logical but I see it as the only reasonable and fair conclusion. As a side benefit it will assist the residents on and around 110th Street by reducing traffic on that street and not plugging an already troublesome intersection at 110th and SW Gaarde St. I experienced the construction on SW Gaarde St. around a year ago. I watched as the city crew created a new driveway for St. Anthony's Cemetery on SW Gaarde St., in addition to their present driveway on Gaarde. Neither the new driveway nor the old existing driveway is 600 feet from the intersection of 115th and SW Gaarde St. I would appreciate a clear explanation as to why the 600 foot rule was not enforced just four blocks west on Gaarde. The church is simply requesting to keep the access that they have had for over forty years, but relocate it further away from the subject intersection. Although it does not create the desired 600 foot separation it does create a safer sight distance than does their existing driveway. It also provides more sight distance than does the intersection of 110ei and Gaarde. I am very aware of the fact that a city, like any organization, has to have rules and regulations to operate effectively, fairly and efficiently. Our lives are filled with rules, regulations and codes which we need to obey and live by. When an organization adopts a set of rules, then along with that comes the need or responsibility to apply and enforce those rules in a fair, consistent and equitable manner. It appears to me that the church has approached their desire to expand their facility by paying their fees and applying for their permits for development. Within that process they are asking for what appears to be a very reasonable variance or adjustment to maintain good traffic flow on and off of their property. The request is being made for a variance to a rule or code that the city has already made exceptions to just a few blocks away. If the city allows one SW Gaarde St. property owner a second new driveway within 600 feet of an intersection with no paperwork or permit, I feel that it is only fair and reasonable to grant the church an adjustment of an existing driveway. As a productive and responsible citizen of the Tigard Community and a local neighbor of the church I would strongly urge the council to grant the requested variance for the Gaarde driveway. I would be more than happy to discuss this matter further and I can be reached at (503) 793-0658. Thank you again for your service to our community and I feel confident that the council will find a reasonable, yet fair and equitable resolution to this request for the variance. Si erely E. my 141 S 20th Place Tigard, Or gon 97224 1 t WAC Series V Area Cutoff The Area Cutoff has a compact forward- throw reflector with a main beam of 60'+ from vertical (30' from horizontal), providing wide lateral distribution and improved uniformities. A Backlight Shield accessory (standard on WAC Series Wall Mount) permits V adjustable house-side cutoff. J 0 Z) Z) IX Candlepower distribution curve of 40OW MH 22' WAC Series Wedge Light. 1.0100' SO- 60 40 20 0' 20' 4a 60' 60' 100' Inc' 100' 80' 60' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' .2.7 36.6 30.5 24! lea 122 6.1 Om 6.1 12.2 16.3 30.5 N! 183 122 61 Om 61 122 163 N! 305 Isofootcandle plot of 40OW MH WAC Series Wedge-Type IV at 25' (7.6 m) mounting height, 0' tilt above horizontal, with backlight shield removed. eceivev f 1 I 11 I irm PC Housing Wattage g 74tclray Mounting Code ~c/say Size (sq.) Lamp Number P,ui (Insert Code at ' in Catalog i) r1d~Cu WAC Series-Type IV Optics 1 =1.1/1' Close Pole Mount 9 16' 150W PSMH WAC'615-M $254 2 = 6' Extended Mount $13 22' 32OW PSMH WAC'6932-M 313 W = Wall Mount $20 16' 100W MH WAC'410-D 241 (Backlight Shield is standard on 16' 175W MH WAC_417-M 229 AC Series Wall Mount) 22' 175W MH WAC-491-M 293 22' 250W MH WAC -492-M 295 NOTE: When using multiple 22' sq. 22' ) 40OW MH WAC-494-M 306 housings at 90' configuration, a special 16' 100W HPS WAC'510-M 225 12' arm is required; see page 150. 16' 150W HPS WAC'515-M 229 22' 25OW HPS WAC'592-M 309 22' 40OW HPS WAC-594-M 317 WPR Series-Type III Optics 1 = 1-1R' Close Pole Mount 9 16' 150W PSMH WPR'615-M $254 2 = 6' Extended Mount $13 VPR Series 22' 1 32OW PSMH WPR_6932-M 313 W = Wall Mount $20 Close Pole Mount- 16' 100W MH WPR-410-D 241 16' 175W MH WPR'417-M 229 22' 175W MH WPR'491-M 293 22' 25OW MH WPR'492-M 295 22' Q1 40OW MH WPR-494-M 306 16' 1DOW HPS WPR'510-M 225 NOTE: When using multiple 22' sq. 16' 15OW HPS WPR'515-M 228 housings di 90' configuration, a special 12' arm is required; see page 150. 22' 250WHPS WPR_592-M 309 22" 40OW HPS WPR'594-M 317 WPR Series Other lamp wattages available-consuR factory ParkingMoadway T Reduced envelope lamp. ED28 for 32OW PSMH and 40OW MH. The Parking/Roadway Light has a Type Options: (Factory-installed) Change Add After Aeliay III asymmetric distribution pattern. Description Suffix To Suffix ~dde~ Ideally suited for roadway applications, 277V Reactor Ballast rPs1411ovy) 27 460 adder parking areas or for building mounted 480V ballast (32owestiw.175-4ooww+a 103-400vHPSO") 5 .ra addc= Security lighting. Ouad-volt ballast (IOOW MH only) M 5 Tri-volt ballast (320W PSMH, T .ca a"e4 100-40OW MH & 100-40OW HPS only) (Canada only) r ' Single Fuse (277V Reactor. 120V. 277V or 347V) 27, 1, 2 or 6 F $13 1. of t Dual ruse (208v, 240V or 480V) 3,4 or 5 F 22 Quartz Standby (delay-relay t)pe) (includes 10OW 0 WM) IQ 277V Reactor) 0 49 Button Photocell (Na on 48OV) 27.1. 2, 3, 4 or 6 P IS External Photocell (480V only) 5 P 24 Accent Stripe- -note al end of catalog number prefix: G--Grey. R=Red (WPR1594B-M) .ra adder Accessories: (field-installed) AA-,t 15" housing ;Du'ee 22" housing Wire Guard FWG-16 $17 FWG-22 P e,-q ;Duee $35 Backlight Shield SBL-16 5 (standard on WAC Series Wall Mount) SBL-22 $9 Introduction 8 Optical Systems ~ Page 130 Candlepower distribution curve of 40OW Mountings Page 116 PSMH 22' WPR Series Wedge Light. Catalog Number Logic/Voltage Suffix Key Page 131 (Preliminary) Accessories ...................................................Page 133 100' ar 60' w' zo a 2v 40' 60' w ,60• 76.6 Poles 120 .........................Pages 154-157 tar 30.5 60' ..i...' 18.3 .a i ..;.........1....E..!.i u2 8 zo.:...;...i..:.... i 0' :....j... 0m 20, 61 ,22 60 8.3 eo 2.! 303 24.4 183 122 61 Om 61 122 163 21.4 3D3 Isofootcandle plot of one 40OW HPS WPR Series Wedge-Type III at 30' (9.1 m) mounting height, and O' tilt above horizontal. (Preliminary) 16'0 (406 mm) 22'0 (559 mm) 16'0 9.5' (241 mm) 22'0 19.4'(340 mm) L 16'0 5.1' (130 mm) 22'0 6.5'(165 mm) Exclusive DeltaGuar&' finish at no extra cost! (800) 236-7000; FAX: (800) 236-7500 Order on-line www.ruudlighting.conl 114 , £ i t s it i~'A z p u T C 1 a 4 1L o v7, u; a§ e ~ j, p e S ~ e w n S S g qq K o + u ~ 4 V Y C E V: ~ * O P V r ' da 4j 4 ~UUIfI°~ ~g111„Ur~ P~~ 1 icy e 3 L 6 a~ v i r r 'd N ~ -FIST CH~R~H [ BAP ~ ~ IG ARC FIRS STREET 11075 SW GAARD EGON ~ ~ ~ N TIGARD, DR 0 0 R3.5 R4.5 z R4.5 R7 z R7 w w 0 a s cr, ~CC NEW CURB AND GUTTER (DY U)a. NEW PLANTER STRIP 3 a ma NEW 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK SW 110TH AVE (LOCAL) _ ~EXISTINGEDGEOFPAVEMENT - - - - - - - - - ' ' - - - - C ' - - - _ _ _ _ } _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Ip HAwuroRNE 76-0 21-0- 14 24'-rn GA 110'-6' 32'-6' lzuw- . Se bac PHASE 1 PARKING ° 4 EXISTING EXISTING 'Setback - 46 SPACES y MINISTRY BUILDING i CHURCH BUILDING 38'-0' FF. 25717 FF. 254.93' 6 EXISTING I - - - - - - - 'BOLT HALL - e f 3'-0' 1516' 24'-0' 24'-0' I I - 6 N - - 3'OVERHANG I 8'-6' o 17 BICYCLE I I 1 TYP. t PARKING R3.5 17PINE / 10 ® ® EXISTING PARKING - 76 SPACES 1 PJgE IT PINE SHED - I ®Ip IN WATER QUALITY SWALE 10 O M o ' 17 FIR - 10 FIR l It F9\1~ 10 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 17 Fqi I I j._ 101111111 11 4 \ 10 PHASE i PARKING - 74 SPACES 9 24"FIR 24-FIR ICF Y 411- FIR I~ 0 ® Ak lry 4 70 _ --r- - S(OPF n r - _ -WFIR _ 40-FFIIRte) 2p FIR W FIR N - _ a 3 _ a H CLVS-T t•~--j~ - N ~b p -ALDERS 20-BIKE PATH EASEMENT IIR 0 4•Pi E ~.---1- - IY AD. 9T IC FI0.S~{{,)1 ® FIR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R3.5 R3.5 ,7 \ R3.5 1 I N SITE AREAS: SHOP R3.5 PHASE 1 SITE PLAN SCALE. 1'.30'.0' 05 15 30 BUILDING 12.793 S.F. = 6% 12,793 S.F. = 6% 22,222 S.F. = 11% 23,428 S.F. = 13% PARKING PHASE 1 I EXISTING PHA PH.2 PH.3 PARKING 27,460 S.F. = 14% 68,620 S.F. = 34% 54,650 S.F. = 27% 67,293 S .F. = 33% LANDSCAPE 162,449 S.F. = 80% 121,289 S.F. = 60% 125,920 S .F. = 62% 111,981 S.F = 54% TOTALS 202.702 S.F = 100% 202702 S.F = 100% 202.702 S.F. = 100% 202.702 S .F = 100% TOVERHANG SPACES: 8'6'X15'6" 120 L EXISTING SPACES 76 196 TOTAL J a ¢ w F ¢ a w w w F N w 0 (r a a 0 _20'BIKE PATH EAS1MENT WETUAND BUFFER BOUNDARY VEGITNTED COM UNITY BOON ARY WETLtND BOUNDARY STREET CENTERLINE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE NEW PROPERTY LINE AFTER 8' ROW DEDICATION R12 ARCHITECT • LA 805 S.E. SHERMAN STREET PORTLAND, OR 97214-4666 5037231.1122 FAX 5031231-0317 V D U I- w L W r fZ N 0 L U) 1- W q a ow Q Q0 m <o L r ) U g U) _ L for LL Q T cc V II- CONTENTS : PHASE 1 SITE PLAN PROJECT: 20216 DRAWN BY : DATE : 4125/05 REVISIONS : CONDITIONAL USE 0 REVIEW 2717705 Q1 Tb ms cros e.awwpoP"o AICHITO -LA Rs x l oaKm, . u . w a Patssmw sm means rs sACOT p ARCHITE - Oy Yrmm oelln~a+ A AFCHIL T LA . CCopylglu ~WS Y ~rx v ~ • R3.5 R4.5 0 R4.5 R7 R7 NEW CURB AND GUTTER NEW PLANTER STRIP NEWS' CONCRETE SIDEWALK SW 110TH AVE EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT - - i 1} f mHAWTHORNE } - - - 76-0-r - _ - - - 11 I 55'-0' m 76'.32'.6" (J) I2•MAPIE® I PHASE2 GM H~ rr. r---------r - mw_ I - T - ~ -I- I - I - PARKING 1 SPAC p, 3'-0"1 24'-0" 3'-0" 4 EXISTING Selbadc EXISTING i m MINISTRY BUILDING 'CHURCH BUILDING 4 I I FF. 257.I7' FF. 254.93_ m I 6 8-0 I EXISTING ' TYP. 3'-0'-" 15'6' 24'-0" 43 BOLT HALL 8 8 i - '-0' o I TYP. 6 2.32e6525 SR4 BICYCL t MASONRY TRASH ENCLOSURE ' PARKING LOADING Iv T201CUEAR wS41EwITH o r~ UNLOADING 3~ryi CHAIN LINK, FULL OPENING GATES PI 1' ' ALIGN WITH DRIVE AISLE ry O ~I R3.5 L 1 ti" , m ' t7 PINE ( 1 I ' N _ r ° 00 ' _ (OPINE 1fP rypA PI C2 11A,.4' { sHEn ow- E, P ADDITlot4 I''• WATER QUALITY SWALE 10 :"0` Sib 1i I Q IT FIN e ~A• O I N 10 Y I I I l1'FIR / _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2- FIR 0 7 ®u'FIR BICYCLE PARKING 10 INSIDE BUILDING TYP' ° T~ N II' _ 2141N NFlR IdF W FIR FgK7A,SC 10 a - ~~---r- \'r_-- - '-~I ® - " -']6'P R- ar FIR 2PFIfl - - ON~ ' C) _0 IW FIR \ - - ^ \ F~- _ _ _ _ - _ .O /✓y 6 ASH A'~ _ - Fry 1 20' BIKE PATH le'AUO c,II EASEMENT I - _ _ IC FIRS ® ~O FIR {fin ~ I I ' _ R3.5 R3.5 I - - - - I ~ L_________________ I R3.5 - - - I II N I R3.5 SHOP PHASE 2 SITE PLAN I SCALE = V=30'-0' 00 5® 1 I PARKING PHASE 2 38'-0' 30'-0" ul w w Q F N w a Q a (7 STREET CENTERLINE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE NEW PROPERTY LINE AFTER 8' ROW DEDICATION R12 .20' BIKE PATH EASEMENT WETILANO BUFFER BOU~DARY VEGITATED COMMUNITY BOUNDARY WETLAND BOUNDARY I OF CREEK TOVERHANGSPACES: B'-6'X15'-6" 116 EXISTING SPACES 6 126 TOTAL ARCHITECT ' LA 805 S.E. SHERMAN STREET PORTLAND, OR 97214-4666 5031231 1122 FAX 503!231-0317 V U Lu W L W F_ ~Z N 0 U) lLl a oX Q Q0 M <p c/) CC ~f L ~L o T V r CONTENTS: PHASE 2 SITE PLAN PROJECT : 20216 DRAWN BY : DATE : 4/25105 REVISIONS : CONDRIONALUSE 1 REVIEW 2117105 Q2 T-&Iwnqam=-ml paperyq ARCHITO -LA. R-rcPyoexml a pa- ey AIIYIni4en mmci,tl Y PnirisSion 0 ARCHITECT - A q , ®CoPPigA - 2005 1 A R3.5 R4.5 R3.5 20' BIKE PATH EASEMENT SW 110TH AVE - - - r EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT - - I - IF- 1 r1 cD IP NAWTH_ LACED, -1 i _ i rrMNtE 717 7 5 6-0 76'•6' a 326' STREET CENTERLINE r---------T_______ _LO - m ~ - - 11 _ _ _ I i I EXISTING PROPERTY LINE IJ I~ JJ I 5-0/y rAM 120- SElba cl~ a a '-0' 1 4 EXISTING EXISTING Setback 38 I ' uei MINISTRY BUILDING, "CHURCST UILDINGI i~ 4 I I FF. 257 17 d . I 30'-0' FF 254 93 3'-0ti 15'8' 24'-0' 6 _ _ _ _ _ 4_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _t1_ C.' 'PDDITION NEW PROPERTY LINE 1 F I I AFTER 8' ROW DEDICATION _ 4 f I I TYP. - - - - -----o p4• 1 YP 8 iw I , 111 LFFFFF 4 n 11 ICYCL .I I PARKING MASONRY TRASH ENCLOSURE IP 13P 1GLEAfl IN SIDE 1 W~ITH I O ` PHASE3 ICHNN ULAN, FULL ORENING wTES PARKING 55 SPACES ' AIIGN WITH DRIVE AISLE ' `t 10 MNE Q 8'-6" o d4 - I ~ - TYP. 4h ! '.w x r~ ' I W m I`! INE I . I ' 10 - - - ~ P w~ ~ 11 3 _ ~IOVINE ADDITION M7 O K ATER v R12 '•.OUALITY SWALE 10 17 FIR N V 10 FIR A"FW~ 12 FIN / 10 ® Vi i 7 i ®rpfl p s 6-07yP N I 0 14- fIR o BICYCLE PARKING TYP o 10 76 INSIDE BUILDING j N 1 J _ I zIFlR iIFIR 20' BIKE PATH 7 EASEMENT 4• FIR ® ® BF) v ° ' - ' _ _ FA7(1NSt n \L_ Di-OL I L \ _ - - 0PE WETLAND BUFFER r - - - ' - - - - zCflR 1P FIR 1FIR ad° BW DARY - G TATE D 1 - - ` - - - - - ® 4• FIR _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ R•5" ' - .3 E N Y] 5 ASH COMMUNITY - - - - - - - USXER3W BOUNDARY - iP C N ERs \ _ ® Q m C IE IT ND. ^ FIRS Flfl \ I IS' I \ YJ WETLI ND BOUNDARY I 1 I ' r _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ CENTERLINE I I I ~ OF CREEK R3.5 R3.5 L_ R3.5 No R3.5 I SHOP PHASE 3 SITE PLAN SCALE _ r=>o'o• It s Is ao PARKING PHASE 3 3'OVERHANG SPACES: 8'8'X15'6' 165 EXISTING SPACES 8 173 TOTAL ARCHITECT - LA 805 S.E. SHERMAN STREET PORTLAND, OR 972144666 SW f 231 1122 FAX 5031231-0317 V U F - w W cn F- f Z 0 (n W q a ow Q Q0 a d V cr cn U) 9 Lo F LL O 0 I-- : CONTENTS PHASE 3 SITE PLAN PROJECT : 20216 DRAWN BY: DATE : 4125105 REVISIONS : CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW 2117/05 Q3 T1vs tr1wwgg'a Ole euf mve -"M a Ie AIiCHRECi U e R ~ eus , . P a wNcaom w ~+r ~.s slrcW d AIiCNRE -U . CDaq+i7N - 2005 Patty L unsford - Closing Arguments for Tigard 1st Baptist Church Page 1 • From: Patty Lunsford To: Joe Turner Date: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 9:20:50 AM Subject: Closing Arguments for Tigard 1 st Baptist Church Hi Joe, Attached is the closing arguments for this project which I was just given, but according to the date stamp it came in on Monday. Let me know if you need anything else. Also, now that I have your signature stamp you can just email me your final order. Thank you! Patricia Lunsford, Planning Secretary City of Tigard, Oregon (503) 639-4171, ext. 2438 patty@ci.tigard.or.us • May 2, 2005 Mr. Joe Turner, Hearing Officer ® City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: CUP 200400005 SLR 2005-00005 SLR 2005-00006 VAR 2005-00016 Dear Mr. Turner: • RECEIVED PLANNING MAY 0 2 2005 CITY OF TIGARD We appreciate the opportunity to offer this closing argument for your approval of our variance/adjustment request to continue our access to SW Gaarde Street. ARCHITECT* LA Pc For 20 years the Church has dispersed traffic into the street system using both SW 110` Avenue and SW Gaarde Street. It doesn't seem right that the only way we can continue using our existing access is to not build anything. Tigard First Baptist Church has experienced the same pressure of growth as the neighborhood and respectfully requests to be allowed to respond to that growth in a way that works for the Church, the neighborhood and the City of Tigard. It is our understanding that the only issue that needs further input is this issue of access onto SW Gaarde. To that end, we asked Frank Charbonneau, our traffic engineer, to revisit his report and specifically address the adjustment criteria to see if the data supports approval. We believe it does and have attached a copy of his memorandum, dated April 27, 2005, for your consideration. Any closure of the existing access would take place during Phase 2 and after its relocation west. We also highlight for your consideration the preap notes given us at our meeting with the City on February 17, 2004. A copy is in your packet but also included here for easy reference. On the second page under access the minimum number of accesses required were three, ter. C«7 1 1 Nh n 7i1' v%lna .,nn r%r% CXU ('-oorAa n dll ' At tb,% ti ma IYYV Vll J TV 11V LT FJL LLJ Vll\/ %Jll V vcacaauV Tv. L1k •l1V billlV, we were hoping to have two entries onto SW Gaarde but the City restricted us to one. In an effort to work with the City we have proceeded for a year with that understanding. We did not know access was going to be recommended for denial until the staff report was issued Simply, traffic today and traffic after our project is built that turns west $05 se She directly onto SW Gaarde Street should not be required to exit throuh Sherman St. the neighborhood via SW 110` Avenue, the intersection of SW 110' & Portland, OR 97214 503- 231- 1 122 Voice 503- 231- 0317 Fax • • SW Gaarde and then turn west past the same point of entry we currently use. Traffic traveling east on SW Gaarde should also be able to access the church site by turning left from the new left turn lane, without adding to the traffic at the intersection with SW 110`x. We feel that in order to arrive at a fair and equitable decision you need to be aware of other recent exceptions to the 600' rule. We can take you to another site just west of ours that added a second driveway onto SW Gaarde and kept the existing as well. Neither of these accesses meet the 600' rule from an intersection. During the construction of improvements on SW Gaarde, the Church was also told that a new access point would be constructed as far west of the existing access as possible. We understand that some modification of the new retaining wall was made to accommodate the access. As construction of our frontage proceeded the existing access was reconstructed but not to the new standards. Construction of the new access was ignored. We respectfully request equal consideration in this process. We want to emphasize the majority of traffic from our site takes place on Sunday mornings and not at the peak times Monday through Friday. This is a good integration of our traffic into the street system. If full approval is still not possible, we will accept conditions on our access in a good faith effort to work with the City of Tigard for a mutually beneficial design solution. We look forward to a favorable response and to your approval of our Conditional Use, Sensitive Lands Permits and adjustment. It is difficult to overturn a specific staff recommendation but feel we have provided sufficient data to help the City do the right thing, in this case, for all parties. Thank you. Sincerely, Abel AIA applicant -UTE •LA r~~ Ai'V a im Wilson, Owner representative. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH . OB CHARBANEAU INGNEERING ujc • RECEIVED PLANNING MAY 0 2 2005 MEMORANDUM Date: April 27, 2005 To: Larry Abell email Architect LA 805 SE Sherman Street Portland OR 97214 From: Frank Charbonneau, P.E. Subject: Gaarde Street Access Justification Tigard First Baptist Church CITY OF TIGARD Larry .architectLa.com FL05118 This memorandum responds to the City of Tigard's Staff Report to the Hearings Officer (hearing date 4/25/05) in which the staff recommended denial of the access spacing adjustment. Section 18.370 of the City's code specifies the criteria for adjustments to the access standards that are being considered with the application. For convenience the criterion from Section 18.370.5 are repeated below with the corresponding response that supports the proposed church access on Gaarde Street as illustrated on the development site plan (reference attached Figure `b', site plan previously submitted with traffic study). Adjustment to access and egress standards (Chapter 18.705) a. In all zoning districts where access and egress drives cannot be readily designed to conform to Code standards within a particular parcel, access with an adjoining property shall be considered. If access in conjunction with another parcel cannot reasonably be achieved, the Director may grant an adjustment to the access requirements of Chapter 18.705 through a Type II procedure, as governed in Section 18.390.030 using approval criteria contained in Subsection 2b below. b. The Director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for an adjustment from the access requirements contained in Chapter 18.705, based on the following criteria: (1) It is not possible to share access; Response to criteria b(1): The church development plan proposes to close the existing assess on Gaarde Street that is located 80 feet (measured near edge to near edge) west of SW 110"' Avenue. The new access will be positioned at a point 219 feet west of 110'hAvenue. Due to the site's characteristics it is not possible to provide a shared access with the adjacent property to the west considering the 20 foot wide City bike path easement and the wetland boundary located along the western-most margin of the church property. Therefore, it is not possible to establish a shared access on Gaarde Street with the adjacent property owner. (2) There are no other alternative access points on the street in question or from another street, Response to criteria b(2): The church property is configured as a long rectangular shape with the north/south dimension exceeding 600 feet. Consequently the on-site 9370 SW Greenburg Road, Suite 411, Portland, OR 97223 _ Phone: (503) 293-1118 _ Fax: (503) 293-1119 traffic circulation pattern will necessitate access to both adjacent streets. Without an access on Gaarde Street the site will contend with an extremely long dead-end driveway segment. A review of the site plan reflects that the driveway length from the south end of the parking lot to the nearest access point (northerly driveway) on 110"' Avenue will total 765 feet. The distance from the south end of the parking lot to the second (south driveway) on 110"' Avenue will total 985 feet. From a functional and traffic safety standpoint the site needs to rely on access to both adjacent streets. Implementation of the proposed access plan will minimize the traffic impacts to the surrounding neighborhood and provide the best circulation plan for emergency vehicles. Without the Gaarde Street access there will be several detriments. • The traffic study projected that a total of 213 vehicles will use the Gaarde Street access during the Sunday peak hour when the church services occur. Without direct access to Gaarde Street these trips and the corresponding turning movements will need to occur at the 110 Avenue intersection, resulting in additional impacts to the intersection and 110"' Avenue. • Site users will experience longer delays in accessing the site without the opportunity to disperse traffic directly onto Gaarde Street. • Emergency vehicles will need to undertake a longer route in accessing the site and there is always a possibility that the long driveway may become obstructed at a critical time, further delaying an emergency vehicle. • The residential neighborhood located east and north of the site will experience additional traffic circulation and impacts. (3) The access separation requirements cannot be met, Response to criteria b(3): According to the City's access code the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The site's frontage along Gaarde Street measures 334 feet so this standard cannot be met. However, the development plan does propose locating the Gaarde Street driveway at the greatest possible separation distance from 110"' Avenue. Due to the City bike easement and adjoining wetland boundary the driveway will be established at the greatest separation distance (219 feet). This represents an improvement compared to the current driveway on Gaarde Street that occurs at a distance of 80 feet from 110"' Ave. In spite of the recent upgrading on Gaarde Street from two lanes to three lanes the City has maintained several other driveways along Gaarde Street that do not meet the minimum access spacing standard. For instance the driveways to the Jolene Apartments and the Park Wood Court Apartments are located on the south side of Gaarde Street within 200 feet of 110'h Avenue. AdditionallX, the separation between the two public streets (110"' Avenue and 112 Avenue) is less than the 600 foot spacing standard. (4) The request is the minimum adjustment required to provide adequate access; Response to criteria b(4): Only one site access to Gaarde Street is proposed with this project. It will replace the existing church driveway that is located within 100 feet of 2 Charbonneau Gaarde Street Access Justification April 28, 2005 Cnnlnccrinn 1 1 r, Tioarrl Rirct Rantict r'hnrrh cul I Inth e., Ir...MP Qt 0 110'h Avenue. This design is considered the minimum improvement to provide adequate site access and is essential for the safety and the traffic circulation needs described in the response to criteria b(2). 3 (5) The approved access or access approved with conditions will result in a safe access; Response to criteria b(5): The traffic analysis report has documented that the proposed access to Gaarde Street will serve 59 exiting and 154 entering trips during the Sunday peak hour. The resulting service level will be LOS 'B' during the Sunday peak hour. On weekdays the access will operate at LOS 'B' during the AM and PM peak hours with 60 trips in the morning peak hour and 14 trips in the afternoon peak hour. Gaarde Street has recently been improved to incorporate a center left turn lane that will provide sufficient storage for eastbound vehicles turning left into the proposed access on Gaarde Street. Intersection sight distance at the proposed access point on Gaarde Street will exceed the AASHTO requirements. To the east over 850 feet of sight distance is available and to the west 475 feet of sight distance is available. Based on the 35 MPH posted speed a minimum sight distance of 390 feet is required. (6) The visual clearance requirements of Chapter 18.745 will be met. Response to criteria b(6): The site will be designed to insure that the visual clearance requirements noted in the code will be met. This includes at the comers of the site property adjacent to the intersection of Gaarde Street at 110"' Avenue and at the corners of the site driveways proposed on 110"' Avenue and on Gaarde Street. This document has responded to the code criteria of Section 18.370-4 and the corresponding code sections referenced throughout in order to justify the proposed site access on Gaarde Street. It has been documented that site must have access to both 110"' Avenue and Gaarde Street in order of function from a traffic safety and capacity standpoint and to minimize the traffic impacts to the surrounding residential neighborhood. M Charbonneau Gaarde Street Access Justification April 28, 2005 Cn..GnevAnn I 1 r, TinarA 17iret Rantiet rhnrrh C{1U I IAth A., lrS arAn Ct ..v11 I un~ REIM MG CUE WgRE R MAY 0 2 2005 CITY OF TIGARD APPLICANT: LA AGENT: Phone: (s,-,,) a 31-i/2a y 2,7 Phone: ( ) PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION. 11t) 7s Sc.-) R,9a,9 S,R TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: 95103D[_ Tt_ //00 LANtu kr--. v; E~J ~ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: _ PS 5- CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM (C.I.T.) AREA: Cf-/4-iF/9 L- ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18. 330 ) MINIMUM LOT SIZE:,0sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: 4k5- ft. Max. building height: 30 ft. Setbacks: Front a S ft. Sided ft. Rear 2 G ft. Corner .20, ft. from street. ' MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: - NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S), AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the aDDlication will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section [J NARRATIVE (Refer to Code pier 18.3901 9 The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Q~'ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.7651 Minimum number of accesses: r Minimum access width: s~oMinimum pavement width: yc)' All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18305.0301 WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. ❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter 8.1301 ➢ STREETS: feet fr the centerline of ➢ LOWER INTENSITY ZONE feet, along the site's boundary. ➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SI E YARD SETBACK. ❑ SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS [ efer to Code Section 18330.010.6.1 BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTION - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: ➢ A maximum building floor a ea to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ➢ All actual building setback will be at least half (%2) of the building's height; and ➢ The structure will not ab a residential zoned district. BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7451 In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Manning Division Section The ESTIMATED REQWED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable td Sur proposal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: All,~Yi/' [,LANDSCAPING [Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 183051 STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. [RECYCLING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7551 Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. liPARKING [Refer to Code Section 18365.0401 REQUIRED parking for this type of use: (,06c e e 3 ~F tiYS ~~,e ill Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): gar SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: ➢ All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. ➢ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Ltd" LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.765.0801 Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be ? provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON-Residential ApplicatioNPlanning Division Section iIII&CLERACKS (Refer to 90 Section 18.7651 • BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.775) The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries is the responsibility of the applicant Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. 7 ❑ STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.715.080.C1 When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. CLEANWATER SERVICES (CWSI BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to R & 0 96-44/USA Regulations - Chapter 31 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION & ORDER 9644 WIDTH OFiVEGE4, ED ENStTDEFINITION NSIT tU~ 4RE/~ roolllt " O " C t PE S D ~ ft K, , RR DOR Rt E Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% 10 to < 50 acres 15 feet > 50 to < 100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: > 25% 1 10 to <50 acres 30 feet 1 > 50 to < 100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands > 25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting • Streams with intermittent flow draining > 100 acres point to the top of ravine (break in • Natural lakes and ponds <25% slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine' Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds, whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor, shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet, if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residenfial AppricationlPlanning Division Section Restrictions in the Ve e Corridor: NO structures, deve ei nt, construction activities, garde lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. SIGNS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7801 SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. M/TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.0.1 A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcls for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: 0 Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to N1 vtccA a trees UUr Iig an U dI LUI Gol l,U UGIIU I. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. MITIGATION [Refer to Code Section 18.190.060.EJ REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-Residenbal ApplicalionlPlanning Division Section ➢ If a replacemen&e of the size cut is not reasonably 4 ilable on the local market or would not be viable, th irector shall require replacement wi more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7951 The Cit requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT ~8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. ❑ ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL (Refer to Code Section 18.810.060) MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 fe unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition ust have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS parcel is less than 1 Y2 times CODE CHUTERS / 18.330 (Conditional Use) 18.340 (Directors Interpretation) 18.350 (Planned Development) 18.360 (Site Development Review) 18.370 (Variances/Adjustments) 18.380 (zoning Maprrext Amendments) 18.385 (Miscellaneous Permits) C 18.390 (Decision Making Procedures/impact Study) 18.410 (Lot Line Adjustments) 18.420 (Land Partitions) / 18.430 (subdivisions) .]L 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts) 18.520 (Commensal Zoning Districts) 18.530 (Industrial Zoning Districts) ALL NOT EXCEED 2%Z TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. 18.620 (Tigard Triangle Design Standards) 18.630 (Washington Square Regional Center) 18.705 (AcoesslEgresslcimutation) 18.710 (Accessory Residential Units) 18.715 (Density Computations) 18.720 (Design Compatibility standards) -21 18.725 (Environmental Performance Standards) 18.730 (Exceptions To Development Standards) 18.740 (Historic Overlay) 18.742 (Home Occupation Permits) 18.745 (Landscaping & screening standards) 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) 18.760 (Nonconforming Situations) ~L 18.765 (Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) 18.775 (Sensitive Lands Review) V 18.780 (signs) J1 1 8.785 (Temporary Use Permits) 8.790 (Free Removal) Z 18.795 (Visual Clearance Areas) /,18.798 (Wireless Communication Facilities) ::2 18.810 (Street & Utility Improvement Standards) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Residential ApplicaboNPimning Division Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMOS: 0 rc'Ci~~JP_ Pn~)S~ l nr C~cc;e. Co AVIS Dar.k~_1- PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. . Public hearing before the Planning Commission recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. held by the City Council. with the Commission making a An additional public hearing shall be APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted) by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be e Mann submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 K 1"'map o a proposed ro'ect should be submitted foF-aftachme nistrative decision. Annlication with un n erl mane cha f nnf a a The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Residential AWtcatiowPlanning Division Section The administrative decil or public hearing will typically occLO. proximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal enod follows, II land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's olic is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY T E DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference an noes cannot cover a Code requirements an aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: t -A 0 CITY Of TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 E-MAIL (stairs rust nunel@dtigard.or.Us TITLE 18 (CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (ODE) INTERNET ADDRESS: www.dJjgard.or.us HApattylmasters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 3-Oct-02 (Engineering section: preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON-Residential Apptication/Planning Division Section w w • RECEIVED PLANNING May 9, 2005 igar , RE: VAR 2005-00016 Mr. Joe Turner Hearing Officer City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. T' d OR 97223 Dear Mr. Turner: MAY 1 0 2005 CITY OF TIGARD ~ hecord ~ oe"lurn-At; •ALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESC*e SOUTH DIVISION ® COMMUNITY SERVICES a OPERATIONS • FIRE PREVENTION Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue May 4, 2005 Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Tigard First Baptist Church Dear Morgan, Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed site plan surrounding the above named development project. Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue endorses this proposal predicated on the following criteria and conditions of approval: 1) FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDING AND TURNAROUNDS: Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. An approved turnaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet. The proposal was submitted appears to provide access to within 150, of all portions of all buildings. It is noteworthy that the existing access from Gaarde St. was reconstructed due to improvements to Gaarde St. and is too steep to allow entrance by all Fire District apparatus. 2) DEAD END ROADS: Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved turnaround. The proposed new parking area located to the West of the buildings will need to have access to Gaarde due to the "remoteness" requirement found in Condition #5 below. The Fine District would prefer that this parking area be provided with an open access to Gaarde. An access with a locked gate would also be acceptable. If a gate is installed and locked, it shall be provided with a Knox brand lock and meet the requirements of Condition # 10 below. 3) ADDITIONAL ACCESS ROADS - COMMERCIAL: Where buildings exceed 30 feet in height or three stories in height shall have at least three separate means of fire apparatus access. Buildings or facilities having a gross area of more than 62,000 square feet shall be provided with at least two separate means of fire apparatus access. Buildings up to 124,000 square feet provided with fire sprinklers may have a single access. 4) AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS: Buildings or portions of buildings or facilities exceeding 30 feet in height above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access shall be provided with approved fire apparatus access roads capable of accommodating fire department aerial apparatus. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located within the aerial fire apparatus access roadway. Fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet in the immediate vicinity of any building or portion of building more than 30 feet in height. At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. 5) REMOTENESS: Where two access roads are required, they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the property or area to be served, measured in a straight line between accesses. 6) SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES: Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less w than 12,500 pounds poi4jad (wheel load) and 75,000 pounds live 10 (gross vehicle weight). You may need to provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of supporting such loading. 7) TURNING RADIUS: The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall be not less than 28 feet and 48 feet respectively, measured from the same center point. 8) PAINTED CURBS: Where required, fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted red and marked "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at approved intervals. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high. Lettering shall be white on red background. 9) GRADE: Fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed 10 percent. Intersections and turnarounds shall be level (maximum 5%) with the exception of crowning for water run-off. When fire sprinklers are installed, a maximum grade of 15% may be allowed. The approval of fire sprinklers as an alternate shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of ORS 455.610(5). 10) GAT : Gates securing fire apparatus roads shall comply with all of the following: Minimum unobstructed width shall be 16 feet, or two 10 foot sections with a center post or island. Gates serving one- or two-family dwellings shall be a minimum of 12 feet in width. Gates shall be set back at minimum of 30 feet from the intersecting roadway. Gates shall be of the swinging or sliding type Manual operation shall be capable by one person Electric gates shall be equipped with a means for operation by fire department personnel Locking devices shall be approved. 11) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi, whichever is less as calculated using IFC, Appendix B. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's Office. 12) FIRE HYDRANTS - COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS: Where a portion of the building is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured in an approved route around the exterior of the building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided. This distance may be increased to 600 feet for buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system. 13) FIRE HYDRANT NUMBER AND DISTRIBUTION: The minimum number and distribution of fine hydrants available to a building shall not be less than that listed in Appendix C, Table C 105.1. Considerations for Placing fire hydrants may be as follows: • Existing hydrants in the area may be used to meet the required number of hydrants as approved. Hydrants that are up to 600 feet away from the nearest point of a subject building that is protected with fire sprinklers may contribute to the required number of hydrants. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by railroad tracks shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants unless approved by the fire code official. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided highways or freeways shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. Heavily traveled collector streets only as approved by the fire code official. • Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the required number of hydrants only if approved by the fire code official. 14) FIRE HYDRANT DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS ROAD: Fire hydrants shall be located not more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway. 15) REFLECTIVE HYDRANT MARKERS: Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access road way that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly 16) FIRE HYDRANT/FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION: A fire hydrant shall be located within 100 feet of a fire department connection (FDC). Fire hydrants and FDC's shall be located on the same side of the fire apparatuocess roadway. FDCs shall normally be Ote except when approved by the fire code official. 17) ACCOS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any combustible construction or storage of combustible materials on the site. 18) KNOX BOX: A Knox Box for building access is required for this building. Please contact the Fire Marshal's Office for an order form and instructions regarding installation and placement. Please contact me at (503) 612-7010 with any additional questions. Sincerely, Eric T. McMullen Deputy Fire Marshal Tigard Hearings Officer Morgan Tracy Tigard City Hall 13125 SW. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 To whom it may concern; 0 4/19/2005 RECEIVED PLANNING APR 2 2 2005 CITY OF TIGARD I am writing in support of The First Baptist Church of Tigard request to expand their church and parking area. My name is Bruce Anderson. 11205 SW. Gaarde St. Tigard, Oregon We have lived on the property bordering the Baptist Church's western boundary for over 40 years. These folks have always been good neighbors and have not infringed on my use of our residential property. As far as I know the church has not had any negative effect on the other residences near the church. Possibly parking on Sunday but that will be taken care of when their expansion of building and parking area are approved. I think the proposed structure will fit into the neighborhood very nicely. Also the new driveway entrance on Gaarde St will give longer sight distance to the comer of 110th and Gaarde St. I support granting all the requested items. Thank you ruse Anderson 11205 SW. Gaarde St. Tigard, Oregon 97224 t ~ "TAB B" Applicant's Materials & All Correspondence Filed with Hearings Officer Prior to the Public Hearing. • • Agenda Item: 2.1 meann uate: A ni z5 zoos STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER WY OF TIGARD FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON CommunityDevekpment SFiavinAA BetterCommunity SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION CASE NOS: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) CUP2004-00005 Sensitive Lands Review LR SLR2005-00005 Sensitive Lands Review ~SLR3 SLR2005-00006 Adjustment (VAR) VAR2005-00016 APPLICANT: Architect LA OWNER: Tiggard First Baptist Church Attn: Larry Abel 1 !075 SW Gaarde Street 805 SE Sherman Street Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97214 PROPOSAL: The applicant is seeking approval for a three-phased expansion. Phase 1 consists of new on-site parking for 134 cars. No new access to Gaarde Street is proposed with this phase, but Sensitive Lands Reviews are required for tide drainageway and steep slopes present on site. Phase 2 consists of a new two story, 4450 square foot addition between the existing church and ministry buildings. This phase will also reconfigure the existing parking lot toprovide access to the new addition, closing the existin access on SW Gaarde Street, and constructin a new access from Ggaarde Street to the new parking lot in Phase 1. An Adjustment to the 600 foot access spacing standards is required. Phase 3 consists of a new two story 18,OOD square foot multi purpose gymnasium building. With this phase, the 2,300 square foot "Bolt Hall" will be demolished and replaced by an additional 47 parking spaces. LOCATION: 11075 SW Gaarde Street; WCTM 2S103DC, Tax Lot 01100. COMP PLAN and ZONING DESIGNATION: R-3.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-3.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE CommuniDevelopment Code Cha ters 18.330, 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, CRITERIA: 18.510, 19.70581108..725, 18.745, 18.55, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Hearings Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Parking Adjustment will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City and meets the Approval Standards as outlined in this report. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the Conditional Use and Sensitive Lands Permits, but recommends DENIAL of the access spacing adjustment, subject to the following recommended Conditions of Approval: TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 1 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ANY SITE WORK (ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT): The applicant s a prepare a cover letter an submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION, ATTN: MORGAN TRACY 503-639-4171, EXT 2428. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 1. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall revise the landscape plans to show: A. Consistency between the proposed tree removal plan, site plan, and landscape plan with regard to tree removal and on site walkway locations. B. Additional vegetative screening along the west side of the lower parking lot. Any plantings that are proposed in the drainageway buffer will need to be native species appropriate for the area, per CWS standards. C. The extent of landscaping that will be provided for each phase. This is to assist inspection staff in determining when the landscape is complete prior to final inspection for each respective phase. Areas that will be graded or disturbed shall be replanted with groundcover to prevent erosion. D. Trees in the parking lots and street trees as native species. The applicant shall consult with the City Forester to determine the species to be used. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall revise the site/utility plans to show: A. The water quality tract shall be redesigned with input from both the ap licant's engineer and arborist, to establish a location that can accommodate the required treatment and detention, and maintain the existing trees. B. Either a) revise the site plan to show no encroachments including structures, grading, or planted vegetation occurring in the existing pathway easement area or b) propose and construct a realigned pathway in a new easement location. If proposing a realignment, the applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any other required approvals, such as sensitive lands review and CWS sign off, if the athwa is in the drainaggewa area. C. A note indicating the height of the masonry trash enclosure will be 6 feet minimum. D. The parking lot will comply with the Oregon Uniform Building Code by providing seven (7) ADA accessible spaces. This number may be reduced to 6 if the total parking provided is fewer than 200 spaces. The applicant shall additionally demonstrate that the minimum parking is provided for each phase after the appropriate number of ADA spaces are provided. E. The number of bicycle rack spaces to be provided in each location. A minimum of 14 spaces are required for phase 1 and 2, and 28 spaces are required at the completion of Phase 3. F. An area for a loading area. Staff suggests that the area in the Phase 2 parking lot turnaround be shown for this purpose. G. The specific profile for the sewer line, as it passes through the sensitive area. The applicant will need to obtain explicit approval from CWS regarding the sewer line work in this area, or else revise their plan such that no work in the buffer is required. If work in the buffer area is allowed, alternate methods of constructing the line will be required to be explored to minimize or eliminate the need for tree removal before the city grants approval to remove these trees. Moreover, prior to removing any trees in the sensitive land area, a tree removal permit shall be obtained from the City. 3. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall submit a detailed lighting plan that shows no glare off site and complies with crime prevention requirements of the Tigard g Code (TDC) Section 18.360.090(10). TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 2 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • 4. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall submit a revised tree removal plan that clearly depicts the trees that will be removed and those that will be retained, and includes the following notations: A. The applicant shall notify the City Arborist when tree protection measures are in place so that he may verify that the measures will function properly prior to construction. B. If it is necessary to enter the tree protection zone at any time with equipment (trucks, bulldozers, etc.) the project arborist and City Forester must be notified before any entry occurs. Before entering the TPZ, the project arborist and City Forester shall determine the method by which entry can occur, along with any additional tree protection measures. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall have the geotech engineer review and approve the construction plans for the City's review and approval. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall provide evidence of all necessary approvals from US Army Corps of Engineers and the Division of State Lands. If no approvals are required, he applicant shall submit a letter stating the reasons why no approval is required. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, ATTN: KIM MCMILLAN 503-639-4171, EXT 2642. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover half street improvements and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the -Building Division and should only include sheet-levant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity w o wi I be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 9. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking Ian for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and tra#c control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 10. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of Gaarde to increase the right-of-way to 38 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 3 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 0 • 11. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department as a part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, whigP indicate that they will construct a half- street improvement along the frontage of 110 Avenue. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a local street from curb to centerline equal to 16 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5 foot concrete sidewalk with a 5 foot planter strip; F. street trees in the planter strip spaced per TDC requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; 1. underground utilities; J. street signs (if applicable); K. driveway apron (if applicable); and L. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW 110th Avenue in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 12. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department as a part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, indicating that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW Gaarde Street as a part of this project: A. removal of the existing driveway, replacing it with curb and sidewalk; B. street trees spaced per TDC requirements; and C. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer. 13. The applicant's epneer shall provide preliminary sight distance cert ifcation for the intersection of 110 Avenue andGaarde Street, with a list of improvements required tQ meet the standard. The engineer shall use the posted speed of 35 mph or the 85 percentile, whichever is greater. 14. Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans. A connection permit is required for the reconnection of the sewer lateral to the main after lowering the lateral. 15. The applicant's engineer shall revise stormwater detention and water quality calculations with the actual impervious surface areas as reflected on Sheet Al. 16. Any extension of public water lines shall be shown on the proposed Public Facility Improvement (PFI permit construction drawings and shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Water ~epartment, as a part of the Engineering Department plan review. NOTE: An estimated 12% of the water system costs must be on deposit with the Water Department prior to approval of the PFI permit plans from the Engineering Department and construction or public water lines. 17. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 18. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement CPR) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition." TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 4 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 19. The applicant shall obtain a 1200-C General Permit issued by the City of Tigard pursuant to ORS 468.740 and the Federal can Water-Act. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: The applicant shall prepare a cover etter an submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION, ATTN: MORGAN TRACY 503-639-4171, EXT 2428. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 20. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/owner shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any existing tree greater than 12" diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. 21. Prior to any site work, the drainage tract must be clearly identified in the field with permanent fencing so as to insure no grading or material is placed in this area. Any fencing that is damaged during construction must be replaced prior to final building inspection. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supportin documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, ATTN: KIM MCMILLAN 503-639-4171, EXT 2642. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 22. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: The applicant shall prepare a cover etter an submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION, ATTN: MORGAN TRACY 503-639-4171, EXT 2428. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 23. Prior to the issuance of final occupancy on any building, the applicant must provide City staff with a letter indicating that all of the provisions of Clean Water Services service provider letter (#4097) have been complied with. 24. Prior to the issuance of final occupancy on any building, re-plant any area where vegetation has been removed as a result of grading in conformance with the Clean Water Services Standards. 25. The applicant shall comply with the protection measures prescribed by the City Arborist. The applicant shall provide the City Arborist with a construction sequence including installation and removal of tree protection devices, clearing, grading, and paving. 26. Prior to final building inspection, the Project Arborist-shall submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy, stable and viable in their modified growing environment. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 5 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supportin documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINNEE G DEPARTMENT, ATTN: KIM MCMILLAN 503-639-4171, EXT 2642. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 27. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 28. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1 3 mil mylar, 2) a diskette of the as- builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "D41' will be acceptable, and 3) the as- built drawings shall be tied to the City's GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). 29. The applicant's e#D Ineer shall provide final sight distance certfication for the intersection of 110 Avenue/Gaarde Street and the driveways on 110' Avenue. Find sight distance certification will be required for the Phase 1 (existin ) driveway on 110 Avenue and the intersection prior to final building inspection of Phase 1. Final sigNt distance certification will be required for the Phase 2 (proposed) driveway on 110 Avenue prior to final building inspection of Phase 2. 30. The existing driveway on Gaarde shall be removed prior to final inspection on Phase 1. 31. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 110th Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of under rounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the unity lines and will be $35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $21,000.00 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. 32. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 36 MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION SHALL RENDER THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION VOID. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Histo : e site is presently developed with a church, classroom building, and small ministry. The site was originally developed in the county in 1962 with the construction of Bolt Hall. fn 1985 a conditional use approval (CU 2-85) was granted to construct the main church and ministry buildings. In 1987 a lot (line adjustment MIS87-03) was approved for the site. This adjustment reconfigured the lot lines of two (2) of the properties owned by the church. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 6 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The church requested and received conditional use approval in 1996 (CUP96-00008) to locate an 8,000 square foot office building on the site. The City has no record of other more recent development applications having been filed for this property. Vicinity Information: Tote south, north and east, the site is adjoined by existing residential uses. To the west, the site slopes downward toward a wetland and Derry Dell Creek. Further to the west, the site is adjoined by another religious assembly use and other residential uses. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is eve ope with a church, a classroom and parking lot. The applicant has proposed a three-phased expansion of the Church facilities. Phase 1 consists of new on-site parking for 134 cars. No new access to Gaarde is proposed with this phase, but sensitive lands reviews are required for the drainageway and steep slopes present on site. Phase 2 consists of a new two story, 4450 square foot addition between the existing church and ministry buildings. This phase will also reconfigure the existing parking lot to provide access to the new addition, closing the existing access on SW Gaarde, and constructing a new access from Gaarde to the new parking lot in Phase 1. An adjustment to the 600 foot access spacing standards is required. Phase 3 consists of a new two story 18,000 square foot multi purpose gymnasium building. With this phase, the 2,300 square foot "Bolt Hall" will be demolished and replaced by an additional 47 parking spaces. SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 Lists the Use Categories. The applicant is proposing to amend the existing conditional -use permit to allow for phased construction of a new gymnasium, an addition to the school, and a new community building along with the associated site work. Churches are permitted by Conditional Use in all zones. The adjustment and sensitive lands reviews that have been requested are typically reviewed administratively. However, when different requests are reviewed concurrently, the highest review authority renders the decision on all matters in the application. In this case, the application is subject to a public hearing before the City of Tigard Hearings Officer. Summa of Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 De tines, the decision-making type to which the land-use application is assigned. The proposed amendment to the existing Conditional Use permit is a Type III-HO decision. The proposed adjustment to the street and driveway spacing requirement is a Type II review, and the proposed Sensitive Lands reviews for steep slopes and drainageways are also Type II reviews. SECTION V. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS TL... T: ..J n.. :a. 11.. ..I.. ..a l~...a.. 41--a Cnn s__a _r 1IIG 1Il"J.aIU VVlllllllillll,% LJCVCIUi.Jllelll IiVUV MquileS UIGII pIUPIVII~% UWIICIj WIL111I1 UUU MUL UI the subject site be notified of the proposal, and be given an opportunity for written comments and/or oral testimony prior to a decision being made. In addition, the applicant is required to post the site with notice of the public hearing. Staff has verified that the site is posted. Staff has not received any comments from any property owners as of the date of this staff report. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 7 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • SECTION VI. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case, in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this report are as follows: A. S ecific Conditional Use Criteria enera Approval ri eria Additional Conditions of Appproval B. oolicable Develooment Code 5 ses C. D. E. 18.360 Site Development Review) 18.370 anances and Adjustments) 18.510 Residential Zoning&rculation 18.705 Access, Egress & )18.725 Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste & Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.775 Sensitive Lands Review) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 isual Clearance) Additional Site Develooment Review Anoroval Stan, SECTION VII. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.330.010.A states that the purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and analysis. Section 18.330.020.A states that a request for approval for a new conditional use shall be processed as a Type III-HO procedure, as regulated by Chapter 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.330.031YA and subject to other requirements in Chapter 18.330. Section 18.330.020.D. states the criteria for phased development approval. As part of the approval process, the Hearings Officer shall approve a time schedule for developing a site in phases over a period of time of one year, but in no case shall the total time period for all phases be greater than three years without reapplying for conditional use review. The criteria for ap roving a phased conditional use review proposal is that all of the following are satisFed: The applicant has proposed a three phased approval for this project. There is no schedule submitted for initiation or completion of each phase. Nevertheless, all three phases will need to be completed prior to the three year expiration period pursuant to this section. 1. The public facilities shall be constructed in conjunction with or prior to each phase. Public facilities will be completed as part of Phase 1, as conditioned in this report. 2. The development and occupancy of any phase shall not be dependent on the use of temporary public facilities. A temporary public facility is any facility not constructed to the applicable City or district standard. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 8 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER No temporary facilities are proposed. 3. The phased development shall not result in requiring the City or other property owners to construct public facilities that were required as part of the approved development proposal. There is an existing bike and pedestrian path easement which was required as part of a 1985 Conditional Use approval. The initial staff report required the pathway be constructed and the greenway be dedicated, however, the final conditions of approval in that decision merely required the pathway easement. The path was never constructed. The applicant's present plans include encroachments into this easement, and to compensate the applicant has proposed to dedicate a blanket pathway easement over the entire sensitive area for this purpose. On further consideration, staff determined that the pathway alignment should not e shifted further into the drainageway, unless the applicant was willing to undertake obtaining approvals and construct the portion of the pathway in the realigned easement. The City has already accepted the burden of constructing the pathway in the current easement as part of that 1985 approval, but should not be responsible for the additional cost and effort associated with developing the path in a different alignment. The applicant will be responsible for constructing any portion of the pathway that is realigned from its previously approved location. General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use: Section 18.330.030: e site size an dimensions provide adequate area or the nee s of the proposed use; The existing site size is 4.65 acres in size. This report evaluates the proposal and necessary review criteria for the site. The site size appears adequate for the needs of the proposed expansion. However, staff is concerned about accommodating a bicycle pedestrian path on the site, after the proposed improvements are completed. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features; The site contains a steeply sloped area with a drainage way beneath. Nevertheless, the applicant's plan takes this into consideration, by maintaining the required buffer setbacks, and putting the parking area parallel to the hillside slope. The building Is additionally designed to take advantage of the grade differential, rather than pad grading for the entire building. This helps minimize the amount of required fill and retaining structures. The size, shape, and location of the site all appear suitable. The site is suitable for the proposed development. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; and According to the comments received, all public facilities including streets, storm and sanitary sewers, and water can adequately serve the site. This criterion is satisfied. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. The following table provides the dimensional standards in the R-3.5 zone, the additional dimensional requirements for religious facilities are specified in the Conditional Use Standards of Section 18.330.050.6.9 and the dimensions proposed for this development. (SEE TABLE ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE) TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 9 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • 0 STANDARD R-3.5 CONDITIONAL USE PROPOSED REQUIREMENT Minimum Lot Size 10,000 sq. ft. 20,000 sq. ft 202,702 sq. ft Minimum Lot Width 65 ft. n/a 610 ft Minimum Setbacks Front yard 20 ft 25 ft 32.5 ft Side facing street on corner & through lots 20 ft 20 ft *15 ft. along SW 110th Side yard loft 20 ft 120 ft Rear yard 20 ft 20 ft 205 ft. Maximum Height 30 ft. SAME AS R-3.5 **30 ft. Maximum Site Coverage [2] - SAME AS R-3.5 46% at Phase III Minimum Landscape Requirement SAME AS R-3.5 54% at Phase III * Presently the structure is non conforming, and encroaches approximately 5 feet into the required yard. All proposed structures will meet the current 20 foot setback requirements. The 30 foot height is calculated from a reference point, 10 feet above the lowest grade (due to the sloped nature of the site), to the midpoint of the highest gabled roof. The site contains structures that are considered non-conformingg with respect to setback requirements. According to the non-conforming chapter of the Ti and Development Code Section 18.760.040(C), a non-conforming structure may continue to be used, enlarged, or altered, as long as it does not increase the non-conformity of the structure, as long as it is not moved, or as long as it is not destroyed by any means beyond 60% of its assessed value. The applicant intends on maintaining this structure as is, and the newly expanded portion will follow present setback requirements. The height of the proposed building is at the absolute maximum, with no margin for error. The applicant is put on notice that any revisions or alterations that occur in the field to respond to specific site or building constraints that result in an increase in the building height will require compensatory measures to ensure the overall height of the building is kept at or below 30 feet. FINDING: The proposed expansion satisfies the dimensional standards of the underlying zone. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this Code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met or can be conditioned to be satisfied. The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Communi Development Code: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.37 , Variances and Adjustments; 18.390, Decision Making Procedures; 18.510, Residential Zoning Districts; 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening, 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage; 18.775, Sensitive Lands; 18.765, Off-Street Parking; 18.790, Tree Removal; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810, Street and Utility Improvement Standards. The development standards and requirements of these chapters are addressed further in this report. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following chapters: 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710, Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations; 18.720, Design Compatibility Standards; 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standard; 18.740, Historic Overlay; 18.742, Home Occupations; 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations; 18.760, Nonconforming Situations; f8.785, Temporary Uses; and 18.798, Wireless Communications Facilities. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006/VAR2005-00016 PAGE 10 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 0 0 The Comprehensive Plan is implemented by the Community Development Code. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan policies are, therefore, assured by satisfaction of the applicable development standards of the development code as addressed within this report. A review of the comp plan did not reveal any policies that are adversely affected by this proposal, provided a solution can be found for the pathway alignment along the creek. (Failure to provide such a pathway easement is in violation of the Park Master Plan, and several sections of the Community Development Code) FINDING: Based on the analysis above, and the condition imposed on the development, the General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use can be satisfied. Section 18.330.3. states a the Hearings u on may impose conditions on the approval of a conditional use, which are found necessary to ensure the use is compatible with other uses in the vicinity, and that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding uses and public facilities is minimized. These conditions may include, but are not limited to the following: Limiting the hours, days, place and/or manner of operation; The majority of activities for the Church occur on Sundays and the school operates on the weekdays. A search of the City's code enforcement records shows no complaints against the existing church operations. Staff does not find any justification to impose conditions limiting the hours, days, and/or manner of operation. Requiring design features, which minimize environmental impacts such as noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust; The hazards related to odor, dust, noise, glare, air pollution, and vibration can be mitigated through the design of the building and the buffering and landscaping of the use that has been proposed. Those hazards that are inherent during construction will be held to the same standards as other construction within the City of Tigard as regulated by the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC). All of these items will be subject to code enforcement if the applicant exceeds the allowed levels. Requiring additional setback areas, lot area, and/or lot depth or width; The buffer requirements are discussed further in this report. There does not appear to be any basis for requiring additional setbacks, lot area, or depth and width. Limiting the building height, size or lot coverage, and/or location on the site; Based on the plans submitted, the applicant has designed and placed the building such that it meets the underlying zone requirements, including height and lot coverage. Designating the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points; Tho nnnlirnn+'e ccrnnA nh-ncc ir%r lh irLno n nrnnnc ~l +n rclnn~+o tem CIA/ IIIV GF/1./IIVGIIV VV VVIIV IIGJV IIIV144VJ G Vl%J VJGI lV IGIVVQIG Q11 QVVGJah Vll VVV v0014G approximately 130 feet urther to the west (2 0 feet away from SW 1101 Avenue). The applicant has applied for an adjustment to vary from the standard 600 foot spacing requirement along arterials. The applicant's proposed access, while an improvement from the present access point 70 feet frrom the intersection, is still far short (roughly 400 feet deficient) of the requirement. Staff will address the adjustment later in this decision; however, to further support staff's position regarding this proposed access point, the following is also offered. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 11 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • 0 The proposal will add roughly 20,000 square feet including a gymnasium with seven classrooms. This not only will increase the amount of traffic that comes to the site for religious services, but will also increase the traffic throughout the week. Regardless, even without any increase in traffic, the accesses on SW Gaarde both existing and proposed do not meek access spacing standards. SW Gaarde is designated as an arterial street, while SW 1101 Avenue is a nelghborhogd route. At completion of Phase 3, the site will have two conforming accesses on SW 110 which provide the required level of access pursuant to TDC 18.705. Since the site will be served by the appropriate number of access which also conform to the spacing standards without an access on SW Gaarde, staff recommends that the existing as well as the proposed access on SW Gaarde not be permitted. It is in the public interest to eliminate, to the extent practicable, access points on designated arterials. Staff acknowledges that there are instances where this cannot be accomplished and still provide access to the parcel, but this is not one of those instances. Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved; Street dedications are proposed, and improvements requested which are addressed later in this report. Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage and/or surfacing of parking and loading areas; Landscaping, screening, drainage, and parking have been addressed individually and in detail later in this report. The applicant's plans include a landscaping plan. Limiting the number, size, location, height and/or lighting of signs; There are no new signs proposed at this time, and the applicant has indicated that any new signage will be applied for at a later date. Compliance with the sign requirements for the underlying zone will be considered once an application is submitted. Limiting or setting standards for the location and/or intensity of outdoor lighting; No specific lighting has been proposed. The orientation and placement of the buildings on the site will minimize potential for off site impacts as they are clustered at the southeast corner and separated form residences by either the creek, parking area, or streets. However, it is presumed that there will be lights in the parking lot that should be shielded so as to not cause glare into nearby residential yards. This will be addressed under the Site Development Review Criteria later in this report. Requiring berms, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for their installation and maintenance; The site is appropriately buffered and landscaping to screen the parking area is proposed, so additional screening is unnecessary. Requiring and designating the size, height, location and/or materials for fences; No new fences are proposed with this application, and there are no screening standards that would necessarily require fencing with the exception of the trash receptacles. This criterion is addressed in more detail under landscaping and screening, and mixed solid waste and recycling. Requiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, soils, vegetation, watercourses, habitat areas and/or drainage areas; TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 12 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • Some of the trees on site are scheduled for removal to accommodate construction. The applicant has provided a tree preservation plan that will be discussed further in this report. The watercourse and drainage area provides the greatest amount of habitat on the site, which is otherwise predominantly formal lawn with scattered trees. The CWS provider letter requires protection and preservation of the stream and its buffer. There is an area where the applicant has proposed a stormwater treatment facility that would require the removal of 3 trees. Staff feels that this can be redesigned in a manner so that these trees can be preserved. A condition to that effect will be imposed. Requiring the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain when land form alterations and development are allowed within the 100-year floodplain; and This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain; therefore, a condition is not necessary. Requiring the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, a condition is not necessary, however, there is a pedestrian/bicycle pathway easement on the site. This pathway easement was required as part of the 1985 Conditional Use approval. The applicant's plans show the parking lot encroaching into this easement alignment. The pathway has not been constructed on or directly adjacent to the site, but is present about 500 feet north of the site. The applicant notes that as part of the Gaarde Street improvement protect, a retaining wall was installed at the terminus of the easement that makes accessing SW Gaarde infeasible from the site. Staff questions this rationale since at least a portion of the easement is in the throat of the proposed vehicular driveway. Regardless, the issue around the easement is that the proposed improvements encroach in to this area. After speaking to the long range planning division, they indicated that there was strong interest in completing this ppathway between Gaarde and Eden Court. Staff recommends that the site plan either be revised to show that no encroachments will occur in this area (including additional grading) or that a pathway will be constructed by the applicant in an alternate alignment with a new easement recorded over the revised alignment. Staff recognizes that Clean Water Service standards may not permit a pathway to be constructed in the stream buffer. Also, staff recognizes that the applicant has not proposed or addressed the criteria for such development in the sensitive areas. Therefore, prior to construction of the pathway, approval for a sensitive lands permit will be required. Responsibility for construction and permit approvals shall lie with the City, unless the pathway easement location is revised by the applicant, in which case, the applicant shall be responsible for such construction and approvals. FINDING: Additional conditions should be imposed to address the potential impacts of this conditionally allowed use. CONDITIONS: No access to SW Gaarde shall be permitted. Existing access to SW Gaarde shall be removed with Phase 1 construction. Prior to any on site improvements, the water quality tract shall be redesigned with input from both the applicant's engineer and arborist, to establish a location that can accommodate the required treatment and detention, and maintain the existing trees. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006/VAR2005-00016 PAGE 13 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • . • Prior to any on site improvements, the applicant shall either a) revise the site plan to show no encroachments including structures, grading, or planted vegetation occurring in the existing pathway easement area or b) propose and construct a realigned pathway in a new easement location. If proposing a realignment, the applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any other required approvals, such as sensitive lands review and CWS sign off, if the pathway is in the drainageway area. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Site Development Review - Cha ter 18.360: The Site Development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Variances and Ad'ustments - Chapter 18.370: The applicant as reqques a an adjustment __jus men o e street and driveway spacing requirements. Section 18.705.030.H.3 states "The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet." SW Gaarde is classified as an arterial street. The current access is approximately 80 feet from the intersection of SW 1101 and SW Gaarde. The proposed access will be 200 feet from this intersection. It is also noted that two other accesses are proposed along SW 1101 Avenue, which are only subject to meeting a 150 foot setback from the intersection, which these will meet. Adjustment to access and egress standards (Chapter 18.705). In all zoning districts where access and egress drives cannot be readily designed to conform to Code standards within a particular parcel, access with an adjoining property shall be considered. If access in conjunction with another parcel cannot reasonably be achieved, the Director may grant an adjustment to the access requirements of Chapter 18.705 through a Type II procedure, as governed in Section 18.390.030, using the following approval criteria: Access with another parcel on SW Gaarde is not reasonable, due to the presence of the intervening creek. However, access is still provided to the site via two alternate driveways on another street. The Director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for an adjustment from the access requirements contained in Chapter '18.705, based on the following criteria: (1) It is not possible to share access; As previously described, it is not possible to share access with the parcel to the west. There is no need to share access with the parcel to the north, since conforming accesses are proposed here. (2) There are no other alternative access points on the street in question or from another street; There are no alternative access points on the street in question, but as indicated on the site plan, not only is access available from another street, it is proposed, and conforms to code requirements. This criterion is not satisfied. (3) The access separation requirements cannot be met; Access separation cannot be met for SW Gaarde, but conforming accesses are proposed on SW 110 . This criterion is not satisfied. (4) The request is the minimum adjustment required to provide adequate access; TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 14 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • 0 Based on the previous findings, this criterion is not satisfied. The minimum adjustment required to provide adequate access is no adjustment whatsoever. (5) The approved access or access approved with conditions will result in a safe access; and There is inadequate substantial evidence to demonstrate this criterion is met. (6) The visual clearance requirements of Chapter 18.795 will be met. There is inadequate substantial evidence to demonstrate this criterion is met based on the presence of the retaining wall at SW Gaarde near the creek, in relation to the grades that are present. FINDING: Based on the findings above, especially criteria 2, 3, and 4, the requested adjustment is denied. Residential Zonin Districts - Chapter 18.510: The residential zoning district development s andards are discussed previously in this report under the Conditional Use standards. It should be noted that Religious Institutions are permitted conditionally in all residential zones. Access Egress and Circulation - Chapter 18.705: Public Street Access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030(H) and 18.705.030(1) shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the city for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis; The site is surrounded on two sides by public streets. The site currently has existing access from SW 110t Avenue, and SW Gaarde. Staff is recommending that the access tQ, SW Gaarde be removed with completion of Phase I. Nevertheless, with access to SW 110 this criterion is satisfied. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The proposal involves a two phased expansion of the existing facilities. The applicant has indicated that the site is a campus setting, and the site plan shows the expansion of the existing sidewalk network on si~V being extended to the new buildings, and to the right-of-way along SW Gaarde and SW 110 Avenue. This criterion has been satisfied. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; and TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 15 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 0 The walkways have been identified on the site plan and discussed brief/y within the narrative. No proposed walkway is less than 5-feet in width, and there are no walkways over 33 feet in length that cross traffic aisles. There is a discrepancy between the landscape plan and the site plans where landscaping has been shown in the walkway areas. Clearly the architect and landscape architect will have to resolve these discrepancies prior to final construction document approval. Should there be any walkways that cross vehicle aisles (none are proposed), the above standards shall apply. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The applicant has indicated to staff that the new sidewalks will be constructed of concrete. This criterion has been addressed. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 100 or more parking spaces is two 30-foot-wide access with a 24- foot pavement width or one 50 foot wide access. There are several proposed accesses onto the site. With the denial of the requested adjustment, the only two accesses will be provided. These two accesses meet the minimum dimensional requirements of 30 feet in width with 24 feet of pavement. This standard is satisfied. Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H): Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. Charbonneau Engineering has submitted a Traffic Analysis Report for this project, dated April 2004. The report addresses sight distance at the propose driveways. According to the engineer the sight distance is adequate at the driveways on 110 h Avenue. The report did not address sight distance at the intersection of Gaarde Street and 110t Avenue. The report states that the speed is 25 mph, which is incorrect. Gaarde Street is an Arterial with a posted speed of 35 mph. The applicant's engineer shall provide preliminary sight distance certification using the correct speed, for the intersection of Gaarde Street and 110 Avenue, along with a list of required improvements, with their Public Facilities Improvement (PFI) permit application), Final sight distance certification will be required for the Phase I (existing) driveway on 110 Avenue and the intersection prior to final building inspection of Phase I. Final sight distance certification will be required for the Phase II (proposed) driveway on 110 Avenue prior to final building inspection of Phase ll. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the a plicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 16 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • Gaarde Street is classified as an Arterl on the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan (TSP). The existing driveway on 110"' Avenue is over 250 feet north of Gaarde Street, thereby meeting tthis criterion. The existing driveway on Gaarde Street is only about 80 feet west of the 110 Avenue intersection, which does not meet this standard. The existing driveway shall be removed prior to final building inspection of Phase I. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. The classification of 110th Avenue is a Neighborhood Route local street); therefore this spacing standard does not apply to the driveways located on 110 Avenue. Gaarde Street is classified as a 3 Lane Arterial requiringg spacing of 600 feet between streets and driveways. The existing driveway ts only about 80 feet from 110' Avenue, while the proposed driveway is 220 feet from 110 Avenue. Both driveways do not meet this spacing standard and are, in fact, substantially below the standard. Staff recommends denial of the proposed driveway, as it does not meet the standard and cannot meet the adjustment and variance criterion. Staff has previously recommended removal of the existing driveway because of its location within the influence area of an Arterial intersection (See 18.705.030.H.2). The development has two driveways that can be utilized on 110 Avenue, both of which are in compliance with the Access Management standards of 18.705.030.H. FINDING: There are discrepancies in the submitted plans and inaccuracies in the sight distance calculations. CONDITIONS: Prior to any site work, the applicant shall coordinate with the landscape architect to make the site plan and landscape plan consistent with regard to tree removal and on site walkwav locations. The applicant's engineer shall provide preliminary sight distance certification using the correct speed, for the intersection of Gaarde Street and 110th Avenue, along with a list of required improvements, with their Public Facilities Improvement (PFI) permit application. Final sight distance certification will be required for the Phase I (existing) driveway on 110th Avenue and the intersection prior to final building inspection of Phase I. Final sight distance certification will be required for the Phase II (proposed) driveway on 110th Avenue prior to final building inspection of Phase II. Environmental Performance Standards - Cha ter 18.725: Requires a federal an state environmental aws, ru es and regulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 Performance Standards regulates: Noise, visible emissions, vibration and odors. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.41.130 r~Fi 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Visible Emissions. Within the Commercial zoning districts and the Industrial Park (I-P) zoning is ric , ere shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point- source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district, which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 17 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER i i Odors. The emissions of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be rea i y detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and Heat. No direct or sky reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high empera ure processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and; 1) there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2) these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. The issue related to headlight glare onto adjacent properties has been addressed elsewhere in this report. Additional landscaping is required to help shield this glare. Also, cutoff shielding will be required on parking lot lighting to avoid glare onto adjacent properties. Insects and Rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. FINDING: Based on the information provided by the applicant, the expanded use of the property will conform to the above requirements. Staff finds that the potential for glare exists from the parking areas, but this is conditioned elsewhere in this report. Additionally, if for some reason the above standards were in question, and it was subsequently found that the use was out of compliance with any of the above standards, the property owner would be subject to code enforcement, court review, and possible fines until they were brought back into compliance. Landscaping and Screenin - Chapter 18.745: Street trees: section 13.745.040 states a all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.C Section 18.745.040.C requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). Street trees (Aristocrat Pear) are shown along both frontages of the site planted at 25 feet on center. Re-vegetation: 18.745.060 states that where natural vegetation has been removed through grading in areas not affected by the landscaping requirements and that are not to be occupied by structures, such areas are to be replanted as set forth in this section to prevent erosion after construction activities are completed. The applicant is seeking approval of the development as phased construction. The applicant's landscape plan is reflective of completion of all three phases. What is difficult to discern with this application is what landscaping improvements will occur with each phase. In particular, will the applicant install landscape material in an area that will be later occupied by a building or parking area? That does not seem to make sense, yet, having no landscaping in these areas raises erosion concerns. Staff has already identified discrepancies between the site and landscape plans, and recommended new landscape plans be submitted. In addition, the applicant should submit a three phase landscape plan that identifies what landscaping will occur with each phase of the development. Land Use Buffering and Screening: Buffering and Screening is required between different types of land uses. It is the intent of these standards to provide for privacy and protection and reduce or eliminate the adverse impacts of visual or noise pollution that a development site may impose on adjacent properties. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 18 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER s • The proposed use is in a residential zone and abutting residential uses on four sides. The screening standards of TDC Section 18.745.050(E)(1), and the buffering requirements of Table 18.745.1 do not specifically speak to religious facilities because they are permitted conditional)y. There is an inherent difference between the uses, however, the facility is separated from those uses by rights-of-way natural resources, or a large buffer on the north side (approximately 60 feet), and the code does not require buffering along right-of-way. The applicant's landscape plan provides suitable landscaping for the completed project. This criterion is satisfied. Screening Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features, which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has provided a preliminary landscape plan that shows the final landscape plan for phase 3. ~ased on this plan, it appears that the parking area will be appropriately screened from SW 110 Avenue. Staff is concerned by the parking lot that will extend down the hill on the west side of the site. This row of parking mar ut headlights focused on residences across the creek. It is noted that the current parking Lois oriented the same direction and sits up higher, but from visiting the site, it seemed that these headlights are not only further away, but are also at a high enough elevation so as not to cause glare into the opposite dwellings. In order to mitigate for this impact, additional screening along the west side of the lower parking lot should be added. Staff also notes that the buffer limit is right up to the parking area, so any screening would have to be comprised of native vegetation. FINDING: Additional screening should be provided to shield headlight glare. The proposal fails to identify how landscaping will be addressed with Phase I and Phase II. CONDITIONS: Prior to any site work, the applicant shall submit revised landscape plans that show additional vegetative screening along the west side of the lower parking lot. Any plantings that are proposed in the drainageway buffer will need to be native species appropriate for the area, per CWS standards. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall submit revised landscape plans that show the extent of landscaping that will be provided for each phase. This is to assist inspection staff in determining when the landscape is complete prior to final inspection for each respective phase. Areas that will be graded or disturbed shall be replanted with groundcover to prevent eroninn, Mixed Solid Waste and Rec clables Storage - Chapter 18.755: Chapter 19.755 requires a new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan, which indicates compliance with this section. Re ardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-offIrom the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 19 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • The applicant has met the franchise hauler review and sign off method. This standard is met. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-se arated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior stora yuareas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance securi or users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the propose se provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The site plan shows a trash enclosure on the north side of the site with adequate area for recyclable storage. The storage area is screened by a masonry wall, but the height has not been specified. By showing this height meeting the minimum six foot height on the final construction drawings, this standard will be met. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall . be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haufers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The proposed storage area meets these standards as conditioned. FINDING: There is insufficient detail to establish if the solid waste standards are met. CONDITION: Prior to site work, the applicant shall add a note indicating the height of the masonry trash enclosure will be 6 feet minimum. Off-Street Parkin and Loading (18.765): Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. Phase 1 will result in 210 spaces. According to the Oregon Uniform Building Code, a parking facility accommodating 201-300 spaces requires 7 ADA accessible spaces. Only 4 are shown. Phase 2 will result in 152 total spaces. According to the Oregon Uniform Building Code, a parking facility accommodating 151-200 spaces requires 6 ADA accessible spaces. There are no ADA spaces shown. Phase 3 will result in 185 total spaces. According to the Oregon Uniform Building Code, a parking facility accommodating 151-200 spaces requires 6 ADA accessible spaces. Four spaces are shown. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 20 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • None of the proposed phases meets the minimum ADA parking space requirements. This criterion has not been met. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The parking areas will be improved with asphalt and are designed to facilitate a forward motion. Pedestrian safety and visual clearance has been addressed elsewhere in this report. This criterion is satisfied. Loading/unloading driveways: A driveway designed for continuous forward flow of passenger vehicles for the purpose of loading and unloading passengers shall be located on the site of any school or other meeting place which is designed to accommodate more than 25 people at one time. The applicant has identified a loading and unloading area interior to the site by the Phase 2 addition. This criterion is satisfied. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The applicant has indicated that the parking lot will be striped and has indicated striping and direction arrows on the plans. This criterion has been met. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. Curbs will function as wheel stops and are provided for this project. This criterion is satisfied. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Table 18.765.1. outlines the minimum dimensions for parking. The parking spaces meet the dimensional standards. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 21 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • i The TDC requires 1 parking space for every 20 seats in the main assembly area. The applicant has indicated that the first two phases will not expand the main sanctuary from its present 280 seats. As such 14 bicycle spaces are required. The final phase will provide seating for a maximum of 550 seats. As such 28 bicycle spaces are required. The applicant calls out area where bicycle parking will occur but does not specify the number provided. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. The TDC requires at a minimum,1 parking space per 3 seats in the main assembly area. The maximum parking allowed fi 1 space per 1.3 seats in the main assembly area. The applicant has indicated that the first two phases will not expand the main sanctuary from its present 280 seats. As such, a minimum of 93 parking spaces are required and a maximum of 215 spaces are allowed. The proposal shows 210 spaces for phase 1 and 152 spaces for phase 2. The final phase will provide seating for a maximum of 550 seats. As such, a minimum of 184 parking spaces are required and a maximum of 423 spaces are allowed. The proposal shows 185 spaces for phase 3. While this standard is met as shown, a prior condition will require some reconfiguration to account for the required handicapped spaces. This typically results in the reduction of available parking. The applicant will need to revise the site plan to account for the required parking for each phase, particularly phase 3. Off-street loading requirements: Off-street loading spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: 1. A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; 2. A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. Off-street loading dimensions: 1. Each loading berth shall be approved by the City Engineer as to design and location; 2. Each loading space shall have sufficient area for turning and maneuvering of vehicles on the site. At a minimum, the maneuvering length shall not be less than twice the overall length of the longest vehicle using the facility site; 3. Entrances and exits for the loading areas shall be provided at locations approved by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 18.710; 4. Screening for off-street loading facilities is required and shall be the same as screening for parking lots in accordance with Chapter 18.745. The applicant notes that no loading space is necessary. However, that does not respond to the criterion. This standard is not met. FINDING: The proposal does not provide the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code. There is inadequate evidence to demonstrate compliance with the bicycle parking requirements. Staff cannot be certain that the parking requirements are met at the end of phase 3 construction with the reconfiguration for ADA parking. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 22 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER CONDITIONS: Prior to site work, the applicant shall revise the parking plan to comply with the Oregon Uniform Building Code and show seven (7) AR accessible spaces. This number may be reduced to 6 if the total parking provided is fewer than 200 spaces. The applicant shall additionally demonstrate that the minimum parking is provided after the appropriate number of ADA spaces are provided. Prior to site work, the applicant shall indicate on the site plan the number of bicycle rack spaces to be provided in each location. A minimum of 14 spaces are required for phase 1 and 2, .and 28 spaces are required at the completion of Phase T The applicant shall indicate on the site plan an area for a loading area. Staff suggests that the area in the Phase 2 parking lot turnaround be shown for this purpose. Sensitive Lands Review - Chapter 18.775 The development site Includes area o drainageways, associated wetlands, and steep slopes. Development of sites that include these areas requires review through the sensitive lands criteria as described below. Jurisdictional wetlands. Landform alterations or developments which are only within wetland areas that meet the jurisdictional requirements and permit criteria of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Division of State Lands, CWS, and/or other federal, state, or regional agencies, and are not designated as significant wetlands on the City of Tigard Wetland and Streams Corridors map., do not require a sensitive lands permit. he City shall require that all necessary permits from other agencies are obtained. All other applicable City requirements must be satisfied, including sensitive land permits for areas within the 100-year floodplain, slopes of 25% or greater or unstable ground, drainageways, and wetlands which are not under state or federal jurisdiction. The wetlands within this site do not appear as significant wetlands on the City's map, but are regulated by CWS and state agencies. A condition of approval will be imposed requiring the necessary permits from Army Corps, Division of State Lands, and CWS be obtained prior to commencing any work within those areas. Stee slopes. The appropriate approval authority shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request for a sensitive lands permit on slopes of 25% or greater or unstable ground based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: 1. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than that required for the use; 2. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property; 3. The structures are appropriately sited and designed to ensure structural stability and proper drainage of foundation and crawl space areas for development with any of the following soil conditions: wet/high water table; high shrink-swell capability; compressible/organic; and shallow depth-to- bedrock; and 4. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 23 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • The proposed land form alteration is limited to the extent necessary to provide for the proposed buildings and associated parking lots. The applicant has attempted to limit the land alteration by placing the roposed parking lot parallel to the slope, but with retaining walls ranging between 1 go 13 feet in height, it is difficult to say that anything other than mass grading is occurring on this site. However, to accommodate the proposed uses, there is not much in the way of viable alternatives. The buildings have been placed in the flatter portion of the site and will require very little earthwork to be situated on the site. The northern parking area will be graded for continuity, but little cut and fill is required. It is the western lower parking lot that seems on its face to not comply with the intent of these standards. Nevertheless, based on the size of the proposed facility, the amount of parking proposed is to meet minimum code standards. It is because of this required parking that the disturbance is necessary. The applicant has submitted an erosion control plan to limit sedimentation migration into the stream, and minimize the potential for ground instability. The stream buffer setback will also assist in preventing washouts or other on-site or off site adverse effects as a result of the proposal. This erosion control plan also addresses revegetation requirements for areas left bare as a result of site grading activity. This is also a requirement of the CWS Service Provider letter. As noted previously, the buildings have been placed in the flatter portion of the site and will require very little earthwork to be situated on the site. This will help ensure that the structures are not jeopardized. A Geotechnical evaluation was also submitted to demonstrate that the site has adequate soil bearing capacity for the proposal. This report found that portions of the site had fill placed on it (generally forming the steep hillside running north-south. The report makes very specific and thorough recommendations of how excavations should be made and how the foundations are to be constructed. These recommendations will need to be incorporated into the building permit plans. Within draina ewa s. The appropriate approval authority shall approve, approve with conditions or eny an application request for a sensitive lands permit within drainageways based upon f ridings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: 1. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than that required for the use; As opposed to the previous findings regarding the general on site grading, the grading nearest the stream resource is not so severe. Minor cuts and fills of 1 to 2 feet are proposed. No disturbance within the drainageway is proposed to accommodate the parking lots or structures. 2. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property; As described previously, an erosion control and grading plan will be required as part of the engineering approval process to insure that grading within the steep slope areas will not result in sedimentation or erosion, as well as avoid on or off-site adverse effects. Furthermore, the City will require the applicant's engineer to submit the proposed construction plans to the geotechnical engineer for review and approval prior to City approval of the construction plans. 3. The water flow capacity of the drainageway is not decreased; The only proposed change in the drainageway is the lowering of an existing sewer lateral. There is inadequate information to determine the amount of earthwork required for this activity, but nevertheless it is a temporary impact that will result in the area being restored to native grades. Therefore, there will be no impact to the water flow capacity. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 24 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • 9 4. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; To address erosion concerns and removal of vegetation, the applicant will be required to submit an erosion control plan prior to any grading. The applicant has shown on the preliminary grading plan that areas affected by landform alterations will be re-planted if not covered by structures or impervious surfaces, and is furthermore required through the CWS service provider letter. It should be noted that the existing sewer lateral passes beneath or near three trees (#14, 15, and 16) Removal of these trees will require a separate tree removal application, as they are within sensitive lands areas. The applicant shall further be advised that alternate methods of constructing the line will be required to be explored to minimize or eliminate the need for tree removal before the city grants approval to remove these trees. 5. The drainageway will be replaced by a public facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum flow in accordance with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan; The 1981 Master Drainage Plan does not identify any public facilities for this portion of Derry Dell Creek. Moreover, there are no noted problems with drainage in this particular area. 6. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands, and CWS approvals shall be obtained; The applicant has shown approvals from Clean Water Services, but has not yet obtained U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Division of State Lands approvals. Also, the CWS letter does not identify the sanitary line work in the approved encroachments. "The only encroachments allowed under this service provider letter are the parking spaces in the southwestern portion of the property". The applicant will need to obtain explicit approval from CWS regarding the sewer line, or else revise their plan such that no work in the buffer is required. These approvals will be required prior to commencing any site work. 7. Where land form alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the consideration of dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian bicycle pathway plan. There is no 100-year floodplain within or adjacent to the proposed development. This standard is inapplicable. FINDING: Provided the applicant complies with the following conditions, the proposal can meet the criteria necessary to issue a sensitive lands permit on this particular site. CONDITIONS: Prior to commencing any site work, the applicant shall submit revised utility plans that show the specific profile for the sewer line, as it passes through the sensitive area. The applicant will need to obtain explicit approval from CWS regarding the sewer line work in this area, or else revise their plan such that no work in the buffer is required. If work in the buffer area is allowed, alternate methods of constructing the line will be required to be explored to minimize or eliminate the need for tree removal before the city grants approval to remove these trees. Moreover, prior to removing any trees in the sensitive land area, a tree removal permit shall be obtained from the City. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 25 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 0 0 • Prior to the issuance of final occupancy on any building, the applicant must provide City staff with a letter indicating that all of the provisions of Clean Water Services service provider letter (#4097) have been complied with. • Prior to any site work, the applicant shall provide evidence of all necessary approvals from US Army Corps of Engineers and the Division of State Lands. If no approvals are required, the applicant shall submit a letter stating the reasons why no approval is required. • Prior to any site work, the drainage tract must be clearly identified in the field with permanent fencing so as to insure no grading or material is placed in this area. Any fencingg that is damaged during construction must be replaced prior to final building inspection. • Prior to any site work, submit and receive approval for an erosion control and grading plan. • Prior to the issuance of final occupancy on any building, re-plant any area where vegetation has been removed as a result of grading in conformance with the Clean Water Services Standards. • Prior to commencing on site improvements, the applicant shall have the geotech engineer review and approve the construction plans for the City's review and approval. Tree Removal - Chapter 18.790 Section requires at a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist be provided for a conditional use application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, identification of which trees are proposed to be removed, and a protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has provided a tree survey and plan from a certified arborist that generally describes the trees that are on the project site and their condition. According to the report, there are a total of thirty-three trees on site over six inches in diameter. Eighteen trees are over 12 inches in diameter. The report identifies ten trees #1-10) that are non-viable. Three of these non viable trees are over 12 Inches in diameter #1, 5, and 10). The applicant's narrative notes that all ten of these trees are to be removed, and the remaining 33 trees (in fact there are only 23 trees remaining after the 10 non-viable trees are deducted) will be retained. This is inconsistent with the site plan shown. On that plan, some trees that have been called out for removal in the narrative are shown as retained, and more notably, there are three trees (#28, 29, and 30) that are shown for removal but noted to be retained. Previously in this report, staff identified that these three trees in the water quality area could be retained by reconfiguring or relocating the facility. Additionally, while the applicant has not acknowledged, or identified the work required for the sewer line work in the sensitive land area, a faint note on Sheet C-6 of C-6 reads "Ex. San. Lat. to be lowered for depth". This sewer line passes beneath two or three other trees on site. Trees removed in the sensitive area require separate tree removal permits, which have not yet been applied for. Using a "worst case scenario" removal of 3 of the 15 viable trees over 12" diameter would be required. This only amounts to 20% removal rate, and would not be subject to the standard mitigation requirements. However, removal of any tree larger than 6" from a sensitive land area requires a permit, and must also be mitigated to ensure no net loss of canopy cover occurs. The applicant's plans are very unclear with respect to the sanitary sewer work. Final review of this aspect of the project will occur with a reevaluation by CWS and through a review of any tree removal permit application. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 26 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • FINDING: The applicant's tree removal plan is inaccurate, and incomplete. CONDITIONS: • Trees in the parking lots and street trees should be native species due to the proximity of the stream. The applicant shall consult with the forester to determine the species to be used. • Prior to any site work, the applicant shall submit a revised tree removal plan that clearly depicts the trees that will be removed and those that will be retained. • The applicant shall comply with the protection measures prescribed by the City Arborist. The applicant shall provide the City Arborist with a construction sequence including installation and removal of tree protection devices, clearing, grading, and paving. • The applicant shall notify the City Arborist when tree protection measures are in place so that he may verify that the measures will function properly prior to construction. • If it is necessary to enter the tree protection zone at any time with equipment (trucks, bulldozers, etc.) the project arborist and City Forester must be notified before any entry occurs. Before entering the TPZ, the project arborist and City Forester shall determine the method by which entry can occur, along with any additional tree protection measures. • Prior to final building inspection, the Project Arborist shall submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy, stable and viable in their modified growing environment. • Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/owner shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any existing tree greater than 12" diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. Visual Clearance Areas - Chapter 18.795: Section . states a the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Section 18.795.030.B. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. Staff was concerned by the vision clearance at the proposed access drive to SW Gaarde, based on the presence of the retaining wall and grade leading to the site. There was a potential that the wall would exceed 30 Inches in height above the travel surface. However, as staff has previously recommended that this access not be permitted there should be no issues with vision clearance. As for the other proposed driveways, there are no proposed structures inside of the vision clearance area, and the applicant has stated in the narrative and shown on the site plan, that no obstructions will be placed in the visual clearance areas. This standard is satisfied. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 27 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • FINDING: The Vision Clearance requirements are met. C. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain) and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.13 (Parking); 18.360.090.12 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.13 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the Disabled); 18.360.090 15 (Provisions of the underlying zone). Compliance with all of the applicable reauirements of this title includina Chanter 18.810. street ana utility stanaaras: As discussed in this report, all applicable sections have been addressed and where the proposal is deficient, staff has recommended conditions to ensure compliance. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drain! a where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and windd. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The applicant's plan with regard to the placement of buildings is the most sensible and responsive to the site. Utilizing the difference in topography to accommodate a bi-level multi purpose gymnasium with vehicular and pedestrian access both above and below is creative. The buildings are clustered at the corner for a stronger presence on the street, and maintain ample distance from the creek drainage. Also, their placement and orientation will take advantage of southern solar exposures. Trees have been previously addressed elsewhere in this report. No buildings or structures are proposed that will hinder air circulation, or prevent fire-fighting personnel from performing their fobs. This criterion has been met. Buffering, screening, and compatibility between adjoining uses: Buffering shall be provided between different types of rand uses and decreased noise levels, air pollution, visual barrier, on site screening of service areas, storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be considered in determining the intensity of the buffer or screen. As discussed previously in this report the site is separated from residential uses by rights-of- way on the south and east, and the large drainage to the west. The proposed site plan also leaves ample room between the houses along the northern portion of the site and the parking area. There are no requirements to provide any buffers or screening aside from the required landscaping and screening that have been discussed previously in this report. This criterion is satisfied TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 28 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Crime Prevention and Safety: Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; Interior laundr y and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangBrous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The applicant has not shown a lighting plan, nor has he addressed the criteria of this section. Staff is unable to make findings with regard to these issues. The crime prevention standards have not been fully met. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The site is 800 feet from the nearest bus line. Sidewalks are present between the site and SW Pacific Highway. This criterion is satisfied. FINDING: The proposal fails to address lighting as required by the TDC Section 18.360.090(10). CONDITION: Prior to issuing building permits for any phase, the applicant shall submit a detailed lighting plan that shows no protection off site and complies with crime prevention requirements of the TDC Section 18.360.090(10). The applicant shall additionally ensure that such lighting is shielded to avoid off-site glare as required by TDC 18.725. D. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS - CHAPTER 18.810 Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as TDCrtion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a neighborhood route street to have a 54-foot right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Gaarde Street and SW 110th Avenue. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 29 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 0 This site lies adjacent to SW Gaarde Street, which is classified as a 3-lane Arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 30 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate the additional RW to provide 38 feet from centerline. SW Gaarde is currently improved. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should install street trees and remove the existing driveway, replacing it with curb and sidewalk. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a Neighborhood Route (local street) to have a 54 foot right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 110th, which is classified as a Neighborhood Route on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 30 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. No additional ROW dedication is required. SW 110th is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should construct half-street improvements. Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that or residential access streets may have segments with grades up to 16% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. The existing roads do not exceed 9%, thereby meeting this criterion. Access to Arterials and Major Collectors: Section 18.810.030.Q states that where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or major collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection or residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The design shall include any of the following: A parallel access street along the arterial or major collector; Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or major collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another street; Screen planting at the rear or side property line to be contained in anon-access reservation along the arterial or major collector; or Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives of this subsection; If a lot has access to two streets with different classifications, primary access should be from the lower classification street. This development has access to two streets with different classifications. The existing and nronosed drivewavs on Gaarde Street- which is the higher rinssificatinn street (Arterial) rin 1- - 1- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - v .-/7 not meet the Access Management standards of 118.701t.039.1-1 and staff has recommended they be denied. This would leave two driveways on 110Avenue that meet the Access management standards and provide primary access in compliance with this standard. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to roviding adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006/VAR2005-00016 PAGE 30 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • 0 Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 2,000 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, re-existing development or; For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. The site is adjacent to an Arterial street; therefore this standard does not apply. Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. There is a bicycle/pedestrian path easement on the site, which presumably was required to meet a similar requirement. Completion of this pathway would provide a suitable connection; however, staff acknowledges that there are environmental and topographic constraints present that may make this infeasible. If the applicant decides to revise the easement, then he shall be responsible for constructing the portion of the pathway that has been relocated. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. No lots are being created or altered by this proposal. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. The site has greater than 25 feet on public street frontages. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. There are existing sidewalks on Gaarde Street and a portion of the frontage along 110th Avenue. The applicant's plas indicate they will be constructing half-street improvements for the remainder of their 110"' Avenue frontage. These improvements include sidewalks, thereby meeting this criterion. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.C states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 31 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • The applicant's plans indicate they will be lowering the existing sewer lateral that serves this site. The applicant's engineer shall confirm that the existing sewer lateral is adequate in size to serve all future develo ment. Because the work to lower the line will take place in the creek and associated buffer areas the applicant must obtain the necessary approvals to work in this area. The connection to main is required to be included in the PFI application. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.C states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this development. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997 Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's engineer has submitted calculations for detention. The impervious surface areas used for the calculations do not match the Site Area summa provided on Sheet Al. The areas are approximately 5% different. Prior to construction, he applicant's engineer shall submit revised calculations for review and approval. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shag include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. O 110th Avenue is not classified as a bicycle facility. Gaarde Street is classified as a bicycle facility. The recent City project provided bicycle striping on SW Gaarde, therefore this criterion is met. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility_ serv ice facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 32 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; All underground utilities, including sanita sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be cons7ructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.C states that a developer shall pa a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conJunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in- lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW 110th Avenue. If the fee in- lieu is proposed, it is equal to $35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 600 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $21,000.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY Traffic Stud Findings: ra is Analysis Report, dated April 2004, was prepared by Charbonneau Engineering for this development. Driveway Spacing: The driveways (existing and proposed) on 110th Avenue meet the spacing standards of 18.705.030.H. The driveways existing and proposed) on Gaarde Street do not meet the standards of 18.705.030.H. This section of the Development Code was discussed earlier in this report with staff recommending approval of the driveways on 110th Avenue and denial of the driveways on Gaarde Street. Left Turn Warrants: The engineer's analysis indicates that left turn warrants are not met with the project build out. Traffic Signal Warrants: The report indicates that with the low peak hur traffic volumes, signalization is not warranted at the intersection of Gaarde Street and 110"' Avenue. Capacity Analysis: The report indicates that the study intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service after the proposed expansion of this project. Public Water S stem: e i y of I agar provides water service in this area. The applicant's plans indicate they will be using an existing domestic service and Fire Department Connection (FDC). The applicant's plans for the PFI application shall include any additional water work proposed. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 33 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Storm Water Quality The i as agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations establis ed by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. The calculations shall be revised to reflect the actual impervious areas, as there is a discreppancyy between the calculations and the Site Area summary provided on the plan Sheet Al. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that he water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: GVVS esi n an ons ruc ion Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, radin excavating, clearing, and any other activiy which accelerates erosion. Per RS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval' prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. Since this site is over one acre, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. Site Permit Required: The applicant is required to obtain a Site Permit from the Building Division to cover all on-site private utility installations (water, sewer, storm, etc.) and driveway construction. This permit shall be obtained prior to approval of the final plat. Address Assi nments: he i y o Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of building permits. E. IMPACT STUDY: Section a states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 34 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The applicant has submitted an impact study addressing the required elements above. ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development. Presently, the TIF for the entire project is estimated at $23,976 (including estimated credits for the demolition of Bolt Hall). These numbers increase by 6% annually, and are subject to change as determined at building permit submittal. Since the Washington County TIF only mitigates for 32 percent of a project's impact, 68 percent is unmitigated. The actual cost of system improvements per trip generated by new development on the transportation system can be determined by the following equation (Larson, Mackenzie Engineering, Dolan Findings, June 1995: TIF=0.32 = 100% of the total impact. $23,976 divided by 0.32 equals $74,925. Since the IF will mitigate for a portion of this impact, it is subtracted from the total (74,925-23,976=$50,949). Therefore, the value of the required exactions should be roughly proportionate to this remaining $50,949. Less mitigated costs Besides the TIF that mitigates for 32% of the projects impact on the transportation system, the applicant is required to dedicate additional right-of-way along SW Gaarde Street (2,504 square feet). The estimated value of the dedication is three dollars a square foot for a total value of $7,12. The applicant is also required to complete an approximate 230 foot section of SW 110 with the installation of curb, sidewalk, partial pavement and street tree improvements. The remainder of the frontage is already complete. At an approximate cost of $150 per lineal foot the improvements are valued at $34,500. Estimated Value of ImDacts Full Impact $74,925 Less TIF Assessment -$23,976 Less Mitigated Costs -$42.012 Estimate value o nmitlaa~-Tmoacts .937 FINDING: Using the above cost factors, it can be determined that the unmitigated impacts exceed the costs of the conditions imposed and, therefore, the conditions are roughly proportional and justified. SECTION Vlll. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Public Works Department has reviewed the proposal and expressed no concerns or objections. The City of Tigard Engineering Department was sent this proposal for review and the comments have been incorporated into this report. The City of Tigard Arborist was sent this proposal and offered the following comments and recommendations: 1. Trees in the parking lots and street trees should be native species due to the proximity of the stream. 2. If it is necessa to enter the tree protection zone at any time with equipment (trucks, bulldozers, etc the project arborist and City Forester must be notified before any entry occurs. efore enteringg the TPZ, the project arborist and City Forester shall determine the method by wF~ich entry can occur, along with any additional tree protection measures. 3. Prior to final building inspection, the Project Arborist shall submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy, stable and viable in their modified growing environment. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 35 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 4. Prior to commencing site work, the applicant shall submit cash or other security for the equivalent value of mitigation required (number of caliper inches times $125 per caliper inch). If additional trees are preserved through the subdivision improvements and construction of houses, and are properly protected through these stages by the same measures afforded to other protected trees on site, the amount of cash or other security may be correspondingly reduced. Any trees planted on the site or off site in accordance with 18.790.060 (D) will be credited against the cash or other security, for two years following final plat approval. After such time, the applicant shall pay the remaining balance as a fee in lieu of planting. 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/owner shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any existing tree greater than 12" diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. 6. Prior to commencing any site work, the applicant shall submit construction drawings that include the approved Tree Removal, Protection and Landscape Plan. The plans shall also include a construction sequence including installation and removal of tree protection devices, clearing, grading, and paving. Only those trees identified on the approved Tree Removal plan are authorized for removal by this decision. 7. Prior to commencing any site work, the applicant shall establish fencing as directed by the project arborist to protect the trees to be retained. The applicant shall allow access by the City Forester for the purpose of monitoring and inspection of the tree protection to verify that the tree protection measures are performing adequately. Failure to follow the plan, or maintain tree protection fencing in the designated locations shall be grounds for immediate suspension of work on the site until remediation measures and/or civil citations can be processed. 8. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the City Forester, at least, once every two weeks, from initial tree protection zone (TPZ) fencing installation, through site work, as he monitors the construction activities and progress. These reports should include any changes that occurred to the TPZ as well as the condition and location of the tree protection fencing. If the amount of TPZ was reduced then the Project Arborist shall justify why the fencing was moved, and shall certify that the construction activities to the trees did not adversely impact the overall, long-term health and stability of the tree(s). If the reports are not submitted or received by the City Forester at the scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan is not being followed by the contractor, the City can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by the City Forester and the Project Arborist. This inspection will be to evaluate the tree protection fencing, determine if the fencing was moved at any point during construction, and determine if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. 9. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit site plan drawings indicating the location of the trees that were preserved on the lot, location of tree protection fencing, and a signature of approval from the project arborist regarding the placement and construction techniques to be employed in building the structure. All proposed protection fencing shall be installed and inspected prior to commencing construction, and shall remain in place through the duration construction. After approval from the City Forester, the tree protection measures may be removed. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 36 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • 0 SECTION IX. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, US Army Corps of Engineers, Portland General Electric, NW Natural Gas, Verizon, Comcast Cable, Tri-Met, and Qwest were all provided an opportunity to comment and did not do so. PREPARED BY: Morgan acy Associate Planner APPROVED BY: Richard BP*ersdorff Planning manager April 18, 2005 DATE April 18, 2005 DATE TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION/CUP2004-00005/SLR2005-00005/SLR2005-00006NAR2005-00016 PAGE 37 OF 37 4/25/05 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER FAIR S GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM VICINITY MAP GAARDE ST a 0 ~I 1MrIHVCIN L V~ CV/ CUP2004-.00005. SLR2005-00005 SLR2005-00006 VAR2005-00016 TIGARD FIRST BAPTI CHURCH EXPANSION N 0 100 200 300 Feet 1'= 251 feet City of Tigard information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 httpJA~v.d.tigard.or. us pity Development Plot date: Mar 30, cm or noun T__-__-__-_ I I _ I am b-i z i ~oR (o I Cl) ' r 06,41 I 44 , I mll q 6 IFTI I I ' ~ I ~ ' ~ I I z 9 1 A r~ o I 6L ! I r S Am ~ my L va 4 II LL I ~ ~3 I o z~ ~ ,I I 64= ° I I ,y r , a I 1 ~ r n Z I a I 1 / I / I 1,1 I I ' ' 1 I ~ ~ppCC O 4' I t0 I ~ I~ V/ - tA i II T I T, N gym--'-- 4 n o~ SW GAAR DE STREET a E ~ N {3 } SrA CITY OF TIGAR CUP2004-0000SUR2005-00005 & 6/VAR2005-00016 M t t i l FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF TIGARD ( ap s no o sca e) CUP2004-00005 AGENCIES & STAFF COMMENTS # REQUEST FOR COMMENS DATE: March 30, 2005 TO: Matt Stine. Urban Forester/Public Works Annex FROM: City of Tigard Planning DIVISION STAFF CONTACT:' y a c _ tI a>111n-et-[x2428) . one• 503 9 i1 Fax: [5031684-129] Cm Of TIGARD Community (Development ,SheTingA Better Community CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT [CUP) 2004-00005/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEWS (SIR] 2005-00005/ SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW [SLR12005-00006/OEYELOPMENTAD1USiMENi [VAR) 2005-00016 ➢ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF TIGARDQ REQUEST: The applicant is seeking Conditional Use Permit approval for a three-phased expansion. Phase 1 :consists of new on site parking for 134 cars. No new access to SW Gaarde Street is proposed with this phase, but Sensitive Lands Reviews are required for the drainageway and step slopes present on site. Phase 2 consists of a new two-story 4,450 square foot addition between the existing church and ministry buildings. This phase will also reconfigure the existing parking lot to provide access to the new addition, closing the existing access on Gaarde Street, and constructing a new access from Gaarde Street to the new parking lot in Phase 1. An Adjustment to the 600-foot access spacing standards is required. Phase 3 consists of a new two-story 18,000 square foot multi purpose gymnasium building. With this phase, the.2,300 square foot "Bolt Hall" will be demolished and replaced by an additional 47 parking spaces. LOCATION: 11075 SW Gaarde Street; WCTM 2S103DC, Tax Lot 1100. ZONE: R-3.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-3.5.zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360,,:18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's StatementlPlans for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 13, 2005. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. YP:LEASE:CH::THE.F:OLLOWLNG.ITEMS THAT-APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: r) K nVE 's PECtES F+R PARKrA14 LbT Z aEaT rK ES b ro 40c, PROn rM rJy' 7b C-R EW n RE.•J CAk rKG ar.&ck Y - ~E~ C-ti~rrr~tGs /nJ brrMA&AL NkE# M PRo Yt'4 a Name & Number of Person(s) Commenting: N\, T~ K • MEMORANDUM TO: Morgan Tracy FROM: Matt Stine, City Forester RE: First Baptist Church of Tigard DATE: April 4, 2005 • As you requested I have provided some comments on the "First Baptist Church of Tigard" project. If you have any questions or concerns regarding my comments please contact me anytime. 1. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING 18.745.030.C, Installation Requirements The installation of all landscaping shall be as follows: 1. All landscaping shall be installed according to accepted planting procedures. 2. The plant material shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nurberg Stock (ANSI Z-60, 1-1986, and any other future revisions); and 3. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. The accepted planting procedures are the guidelines described in the Tigard Tree Manual. These guidelines follow those set forth by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) tree planting guidelines as well as the standards set forth in the American Institute of Architects' Architectural Graphic Standards, 10th edition. In the Architectural Graphic Standards there are guidelines for selecting and planting trees based on the soil volume and size at maturity. Additionally, there are directions for soil amendments and modifications. • In order to develop tree species diversity onsite it is recommended that the following guidelines be followed: o No more than 30% of any one family be planted onsite. o No more than 20% of any one genus be planted onsite. o No more than 10% of any one species be planted onsite. 18.745.030.E, Protection of Existing Landscaping. Existing vegetation on a site shall be protected as much as possible: 1. The developer shall provide methods for the protection of existing vegetation to remain during the construction process; and 2. The plants to be saved shall be noted on the landscape plans (e.g., areas not to be disturbed can be fenced, as in snow fencing which can be placed around the individual trees). See comments under "Tree Removal". 18.745.030.G, Conditions of Approval of Existing Vegetation. The review procedures and standards for required landscaping and screening shall be specified in the conditions of approval during development review and in no instance shall be less than that required for conventional development. See recommended conditions of approval at the end of this memorandum. 18.745.040, Street Trees A. Protection of existing vegetation. All development projects fronting on a public street, private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040.C. • The accepted planting procedures are the guidelines described in the Tigard Tree Manual. These guidelines follow those set forth by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) tree planting guidelines as well as the standards set forth in the American Institute of Architects' Architectural Graphic Standards, 10th edition. In the Architectural Graphic Standards there are guidelines for selecting and planting trees based on the soil volume and size at maturity. Additionally, there are directions for soil amendments and modifications. • In order to develop tree species diversity onsite it is recommended that the following guidelines be followed: o No more than 30% of any one family be planted onsite. n Nn mnre than 20% of anv one nenus he nlanted onsite. o No more than 10% of any one species be planted onsite. 2. TREE REMOVAL 18.790.030, Tree Plan Requirement A. Tree plan required. A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a • • subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. B. Plan requirements. The tree plan shall include the following: 1. Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; 2. Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance with the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: a. Retention of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program in accordance with Section 18.790.0601) of no net loss of trees; b. Retention of from 25% to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.0601); c. Retention of from 50% to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.0601); d. Retention of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation. 3. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; 4. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. As required, the applicant submitted a tree plan that was conducted by Ray Myer. The plan contains all four of the required components of a tree plan, nnri is tharafnra nrrantahla Due to the close proximity of this project to the creek, I suggest using only native tree and shrub species in the parking lot and along the streets. When cutting the blackberry in the creek's buffer area I suggest leaving the cuttings where they fall to protect the soil from erosion. 0 • If it is necessary to enter the tree protection zone at any time with equipment (trucks, bulldozers, etc.) the project arborist and City Forester must be notified before any entry occurs. Before entering the TPZ, the project arborist and City.Forester shall determine the method by which entry can occur, along with any additional tree protection measures. • Prior to issuance of building permits, the Project Arborist shall submit a final certification indicating the elements of the Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy, stable and viable in their modified growing environment. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Prior to commencing site work, the applicant shall submit cash or other security for the equivalent value of mitigation required (number of caliper inches times $125 per caliper inch). If additional trees are preserved through the subdivision improvements and construction of houses, and are properly protected through these stages by the same measures afforded to other protected trees on site, the amount of cash or other security may be correspondingly reduced. Any trees planted on the site or off site in accordance with 18.790.060 (D) will be credited against the cash or other security, for two years following final plat approval. After such time, the applicant shall pay the remaining balance as a fee in lieu of planting. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/owner shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any existing tree greater than 12" diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. 3. Prior to commencing any site work, the applicant shall submit construction drawings that include the approved Tree Removal, Protection and Landscape Plan. The plans shall also include a construction sequence including installation and removal of tree protection devices, clearing, grading, and paving. Only those trees identified on the approved Tree Removal plan are authorized for removal by this decision. 4. Prior to commencing any site work, the applicant shall establish fencing as directed by the project arborist to protect the trees to be retained. 'The applicant shall allow access by the City Forester for the purpose of monitoring and inspection of the tree protection to verify that the tree protection measures are performing adequately. Failure to follow the plan, or maintain tree protection fencing in the designated locations shall be grounds for immediate suspension of work on the site until remediation measures and/or civil citations can be processed. 0 • 5. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall ensure that the Project Arborist has submitted written reports to the City Forester, at least, once every two weeks, from initial tree protection zone (TPZ) fencing installation, through site work, as he monitors the construction activities and progress. These reports should include any changes that occurred to the TPZ as well as the condition and location of the tree protection fencing. If the amount of TPZ was reduced then the Project Arborist shall justify why the fencing was moved, and shall certify that the construction activities to the trees did not adversely impact the overall, long- term health and stability of the tree(s). If the reports are not submitted or received by the City Forester at the scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan is not being followed by the contractor, the City can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by the City Forester. and the Project Arborist. This inspection will be to evaluate the tree protection fencing, determine if the fencing was moved at any point during construction, and determine if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated. 6. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit site plan drawings indicating the location of the trees that were preserved on the lot, location of tree protection fencing, and a signature of approval from the project arborist regarding the placement and construction techniques to be employed in building the house. All proposed protection fencing shall be installed and inspected prior to commencing construction, and shall remain in place through the duration of home building. After approval from the City Forester, the tree protection measures may be removed. If you have any questions please call me anytime. Thank you for requesting my comments on this project. MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: 4/14/05 TO: Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner FROM: Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer RE: CUP2004-00005 First Baptist Church Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. Charbonneau Engineering has submitted a Traffic Analysis Report for this project, dated April 2004. The report addresses sight distance at the proposed driveways. According to the engineer the sight distance is adequate at the driveways on 110th Avenue. The report did not address sight distance at the intersection of Gaarde Street and 110th Avenue. The report states that the speed is 25 mph, which is incorrect. Gaarde Street is an Arterial with a posted speed of 35 mph. The applicant's engineer shall provide preliminary sight distance certification using the correct speed, for the intersection of Gaarde Street and 110th Avenue, along with a list of required improvements, with their Public Facilities Improvement (PFI) permit application. Final sight distance certification will be required for the Phase I (existing) driveway on 110th Avenue and the intersection prior to final building inspection of Phase I. Final sight distance certification will be required for the Phase II (proposed) driveway on 110th Avenue prior to final building inspection of Phase II. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be n1aCP_[i in the infliianna nrP_A of rn1lat- nr nr nr4nrinl r.-.--- - -..vw- v• w. •...w. .7 ~.G~r~ I Ll«l ~7 ~.rV ~IV11.7. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2004-00005 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PAGE 1 any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. Gaarde Street is classified as an Arterial on the Cit~ of Tigard Transportation System Plan (TSP). The existing driveway on 110t Avenue is over 250 feet. north of Gaarde Street, thereby meeting this criterion. The existing driveway on Gaarde Street is only about 80 feet west of the 110th Avenue intersection, which does not meet this standard. The existing driveway shall be removed prior to final building inspection of Phase I. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. The classification of 110th Avenue is a Neighborhood Route (local street); therefore this spacing standard does not apply to the driveways located on 110th Avenue. Gaarde Street is classified as a 3 Lane Arterial requiring spacing of 600. feet between streets and driveways. The existing driveway is only about 80 feet from 110th Avenue, while the proposed driveway is 220 feet from 110th Avenue. Both driveways do not meet this spacing standard and are, in fact, substantially below the standard. Staff recommends denial of the proposed driveway, as it does not meet the standard and cannot meet the adjustment and variance criterion. Staff has previously recommended removal of the existing driveway because of its location within the influence-area of an Arterial intersection (See 18.705.030.H.2). The development has two driveways that can be utilized on 110th Avenue, both of which are in compliance with the Access Management standards of 18.705.030.H. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: -Improvements: - - Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2004-00005 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PAGE 2 Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a 3-lane Arterial Street to have a 76 right-of-way width and 48-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Gaarde Street, which is classified as a 3-lane Arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 30 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to provide 38 feet from centerline. SW Gaarde is currently improved. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should install street trees and remove the existing driveway, replacing it with curb and sidewalk. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street. Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a Neighborhood Route (local street) to have a 54 foot right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 110th, which is classified as a Neighborhood Route on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 30 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. No.additional ROW dedication is required. SW 110th is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should construct half-street improvements. Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have spnmon+c with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. The existing roads do not exceed 9%, thereby meeting this criterion. Access to Arterials and Major Collectors: Section 18.810.030.Q states that where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or major collector street, the development design shall provide ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2004-00005 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PAGE 3 adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The design shall include any of the following: • A parallel access street along the arterial or major collector; • Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or major collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another street; • Screen planting at the rear or side property line to be contained in a non-access reservation along the arterial or major collector; or • Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives of this subsection; • If a lot has access to two streets with different classifications, primary access should be from the lower classification street. This development has access to two streets with different classifications. The existing and proposed driveways on Gaarde Street, which is the higher classification street (Arterial), do not meet the Access Management standards of 18.705.030.H and staff has recommended they be denied. This would leave two driveways on 110th Avenue that meet the Access management standards and provide primary access in compliance with this standard. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of- way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. PLANNING Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. PLANNING ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2004-00005 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PAGE 4 • Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district.: PLANNING Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. PLANNING Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. There are existing sidewalks on Gaarde Street and a portion of the frontage along 110th Avenue. The applicant's plans indicate they will be constructing half- street improvements for the remainder of their 110th Avenue frontage. These improvements include sidewalks, thereby meeting this criterion. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.C states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant's plans indicate they will be lowering the existing sewer lateral that serves this site. The applicant's engineer shall confirm that the existing sewer lateral is adequate in size to serve all future development. Because the work to lower the line will take place in the creek and associated buffer areas the applicant must obtain the necessary approvals to work. in this area. The connection to main is required to be included in the PFI application. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2004-00005 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PAGE 5 0 9 Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers.to make adequate provisions for storm water and floodwater runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.C states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this development. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net. increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's engineer has submitted calculations for detention. The impervious surface areas used for the calculations do not match the Site Area summary provided on Sheet Al. The areas are approximately 5% different. Prior to construction, the applicant's engineer shall submit revised calculations for review and approval. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2004-00005 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PAGE 6 Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. 110th Avenue is not classified as a bicycle facility. Gaarde Street is classified as a bicycle facility. The recent City project provided bicycle striping, therefore this criterion is met. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.C states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW 110th Avenue. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ X5.00 per lineal foot of street frontage ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2004-00005 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PAGE 7 • 0 that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 600 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $ 21,000.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: A Traffic Analysis Report, dated April 2004, was prepared by Charbonneau Engineering for this development. Driveway Spacing: The driveways (existing and proposed) on 110th Avenue meet the spacing standards of 18.705.030.H. The driveways (existing and proposed) on Gaarde Street do not meet the standards of 18.705.030.H. This section of the Development Code was discussed earlier in this report with staff recommending approval of the driveways on 110th Avenue and denial of the . driveways on Gaarde Street. Left Turn Warrants: The engineer's analysis indicates that left turn warrants are not met with the project build out. Traffic Signal Warrants: The report indicates that with the low peak hour traffic volumes, signalization is not warranted at the intersection of Gaarde Street and 110th Avenue. Capacity Analysis: The report indicates that the study intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service after the proposed expansion of this project. Public Water System: The City of Tigard provides water service in this area. The applicant's plans indicate they will be using an existing domestic service and Fire Department Connection (FDC). The applicant's plans for the PFI application shall include any additional water work proposed. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in-100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces.. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2004-00005 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PAGE 8 frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. The calculations'shall be revised to reflect the actual impervious areas, as there is a discrepancy between the calculations and the Site Area summary provided on the plan Sheet Al. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Gradinq and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. Since this site is over one acre, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. Site Permit Required: The applicant is required to obtain a Site Permit from the Building Division to cover all on-site private utility installations (water, sewer, storm, etc.) and driveway construction. This permit shall be obtained prior to approval of the final plat. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2004-00005 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PAGE 9 Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $ 50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of building permits. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover half street improvements and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permitte6', and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking anri traffic. cnntrnl di rinn the ni ihlic immr-womant rrnnetmrrtinn nhnec 011 r___..,. ....r.... .....v..wNuv~.. rill construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2004-00005 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PAGE 10 Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of Gaarde to increase the right-of-way to 38 feet from.the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering: Department as a part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, which indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of 110th Avenue. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a local street from curb to centerline equal to 16 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5 foot concrete sidewalk with a 5 foot planter strip; F. street trees in the planter strip spaced per TDC requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; 1. underground utilities; J. street signs (if applicable); K. driveway apron (if applicable); and L. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW 110th Avenue in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department as a part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, indicating that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW Gaarde.Street as a part of this project: A. removal of the existing driveway, replacing it with curb and sidewalk; B. street trees spaced per TDC requirements; and C. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer. The applicant's engineer shall provide preliminary sight distance certification for the intersection of 110th Avenue and Gaarde Street, with a list of improvements required to meet the standard. The engineer shall use the posted speed of 35 mph or the 85th percentile, whichever is greater. Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans. A connection permit is ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2004-00005 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PAGE 11 • 0 required for the reconnection of the sewer lateral to the main after lowering the lateral. The applicant's engineer shall revise stormwater detention and water quality calculations with the actual impervious surface areas as reflected on Sheet Al. Any extension of public water lines shall be shown on the proposed Public Facility -Improvement (PFI) permit construction drawings and shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Water Department, as a part of the Engineering Department plan review. NOTE:-An estimated 12% of the water system costs must be on deposit with the Water Department prior to approval of the PFI permit plans from the Engineering Department and construction of public water lines. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans. and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. An erosion control plan shall be provided. as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition." The applicant shall obtain a 1200-C General Permit issued by the City of Tigard pursuant to ORS 468.740 and the Federal Clean Water Act. THE FOLLOWING.CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2004-00005 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PAGE 12 • • THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-417:1, ext. 2642) for review and approval: Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as- built drawings of the public improvements as follows:. 1) 3 mil mylar, 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable, and 3) the as-built drawings shall be tied to the City's GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). The applicant's engineer shall provide final sight distance certification for the intersection of 110th Avenue/Gaarde Street and the driveways on 110th Avenue. The existing driveway on Gaarde shall be removed prior to final building inspection. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 110th Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 21,000.00 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility. is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP2004-00005 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PAGE 13 is M' LAND LAND USE NOTIFICATIc*,6RM `313 1/6-5 (this form is to be completed only by planning, department staff for mapped wetlands/waterways) DEPARTMENT OF STATE LANDS WETLANDS PROGRAM 775 Summer Street NE, Suite 100; Salem, OR 97301-1279; (503) 378-3805 1. County: 1#61410&=AZ Local Case File _ 6VP2WL1" ~ A7d05 city: El County DSL Proe # N aW5- Ogg 9 (completed . by SL Staff)Responsible Jurisdiction: Ci Ject 43514 (completed by DSppL Staff) 2. APPLICANT: L>t a#h f<ca11f14: o,LANDOWNER: 5.4 Bg_jb5t (.kurv~ of "ritfl/ name name go 5 SC 91 t rm 5~, i 107 W Ca rat, 5L T , mailing address mailing address -7 -Z 14 OK 9-7 ILS ..mailing address mailing address RECEIVED PLANNING city, state zip- city, state zip ( ) QPR.° 1 4-7005 phone phone 3. LOCATION CITY OF TIGARD . T R I W S 03 V. P6 Tax Lot(s) IJ 00 Address (street/city) 1107a e. S . , TLGLiD( 6R NWI quad map name Attach all the following (with site marked):(qWj/ NWI. Map (if no LWI map) . P cel K p,) . ~ e Pl (if any) If applicable attach: ❑ Other 4. SITE INFORMATION LWFNWI Wetland Classification Codes(s) Adjacent Waterway (if any) ~2( Lr" Zoning .5. PROPOSED ACTIVITY ❑ site plan approval ❑ subdivision ❑ grading permit . [I planned unit development conditional use permit ❑ building permit (new structures) f o ❑ Other Project Description '3?L5 4W r A Completed by/Contact _ o 7-c o. 39 /7l Date 3/30 0 Address 1317-5 SL✓ Hal( `Blv S ,mil OR 47227 Phone: Q Lo-J) 6 - LJ/71 )c 2LIZ$ J ~ . DSL RESPONSE • ❑ A removal-fill permit is required. from the Department of State Lands ❑ A removal-fill permit will be required when the development project proceeds AA removal-fill permit may be required A permit may be required by the Corps of Engineers (503-808-4373) Information needed includes: A wetland determination/delineation report (Consultants list enclosed) ❑ State Permit # ❑ was issued . ❑ has been applied for " ❑ No removal-fill permit is required for the described project if/because: ❑ On-mite Visit By: Date: Response completed by: c j1t mvnit Date: * If the project is changed to involve, fill or removal from the wetlands area, a state removal- http://www. oregonstatelands.us/wetlanduse.htm permit will be required. August 2004 COUNTYWIDE Date: o aQ Plans Check No. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ProiectTitle: WORKSHEET - ; (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) i'C5~"~~~ ~~S~I1Gf-~~G Applicant: Mailing Address: l1 Tax Map No. Site Address: Land Use Category Rate Per Trip Payment Method ❑ RESIDENTIAL $ 269.00 ❑ CASH/CHECK ❑ BUSINESS/COMMERCIAL $ 68.00 ❑ CREDIT ❑ OFFICE $ 247.00 ❑ BANCROFT (PROMISSORY NOTE) ❑ j INDUSTRIAL $ 259.00 ❑ DEFER TO OCCUPANCY Z- INSTITUTIONAL $ 111.00 LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF USE WEEKDAY AVG TRIP RATE WEEKEND AVG TRIP RATE (institutional) v 7.7oXy /g_ I~xv BASIS 4a w NQ Z-s SD ~ bvi CALCULATIONS +40._G~ Y, R-a3Jq-7 (o / ADDITIONAL NOTES OF ~f to -k Lt. cv- Lif fE PROJECT TRIP GENERATION 1;~ ROAD AMOUNz ti TRANSIT AMOUNT ~q ywo ~0 TOTAL FEE / a PREPARED BY APPLICANT'S APPLICATION MATERIALS PRE-APP. HELD BY. CITY OF TIGARD OREGON CIT)WF TIGARD PLAN NINCWIVISIO&UM ME 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OR 97223-8189 503.639.41711503.684.7297 MR 0 2 2005 File # Q = Other Case # Dale sy ~ Receipt # City ❑ Urb ❑ Date Complete L`_..J LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑ AdjustmenWariance (I or it) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment (IV) Conditional Use (III) ❑ Historic Overlay (11 or III) ❑ Home Occupation (11) //DT-5 _dW ejA.4A a Sr. ❑ Minor Land Partition (11) ❑ Planned Development (111) Sensitive Lands Review (I, II or III) ❑ Site Development Review (II) ❑ Subdivision (II or III) ❑ Zone Change (III) ❑ Zone Change Annexation (IV) ❑ Zone Ordinance Amondment (IV) 2 510-5 DG TL 1160 I 4.5,Nc 3:5...-cccvXWR5Vry Re~iMAI r~A1.. AWHI rm-cr• to bra 5 s5 s~&P.AfttJ sr. 7t0r4MV, oR 9 72/ ¢ I S03 - X3/-//2,2. + X03 • ?,N 02Y? 'r/4-4X D r/RST Fa/}PZ'!ST G>Ff~ G~f //0 75 -940 (:57-49A5:qr Tl6AW.. oK 97223 603 -103 9- 3,71_3 !QDg - 66¢ - /9'5'x' 'When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be ( purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The`vM1+vners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this a Iicatlon. APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS DESCRIED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL RFnjJ1P1= AF=K1TC'1 IMCAD ueTinti cucGT THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: 0 ♦ If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. ♦ All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. ♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. F/s/0 Own gat re Date Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Appileant/Agent/Representative's Signature App!Icant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date Date Date Date Date Date THE APPLICANT SHALL ERTlFY THAT: ♦ If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. SD Own gat re Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date Apptlcant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date FORM No. 761-WARRANTY DEED-CORPORA SCI U11 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that.. and existing under th laws of the State of........ Oregon...... in consideration of.. Ij- ''~C?•'-''~---- ~I F l.x'. s t...BcV.ti s t Church _of.. Tigard....... .........a corporation duly organized hereinafter called grantor, ...................................Dollars to grantor paid, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto Cons.ervative..Baptist..lLetro--... politan.Mission-Socisty.......-- hereinafter called grantee and grantee's heirs, successors and assigns, that certain real property, with the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or appertaining, situated in the County of...Wa,Shl.ngton and State of Oregon, described as follows, to-wit: Beginning at a point South 890 351 West 1419.00 feet and North 00 111 West 20.00 feet from the Southeast corner of Section 3, Tovanship 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon.9 thence North 00 111 West 171.00 feet; thence South 890 49, West 226.00 feet; thence South 00 111 East 171.00 feet to a point North 00 111 West 20.00 feet from the South line of said Section 3; thence North 890 35, East 126.00 feet to the point of be- ginning. To Have and to Hold the above described and granted premises unto the said grantee and grantee's heirs, successors and assigns forever. And said grantor hereby covenants to and with said grantee and grantee's heirs, successors and assigns, that grantor is lawfully seized in fee simple of the above granted premises, free from all encum- brances ...nose............................. . and that grantor will warrant and forever defend the above granted prem- ises and every part and parcel thereof against the lawful claims and demands of all persons whomsoever. ' F•n .construing this deed and where the context so requires, the singular includes the plural. coCti) Done by order of the grantor's board of directors, with its corporate seal attached, j, - this day of.... Februaz-y 156.9. c _ Eir..st..Raptist.. Church..of...Tigard....... 5e (vORFOR`A`fl SEAL ' . ' i " B President 'T.:.-'-r!... Secretary '-IORSi 93.4901 STATE OF OREGON, County of..... /T~.Z~.Crf.✓..) ss. .,,Personally appeare/! l........... andjilr(/~i-cam tyhq, b~.sworn, each for h . self and not one for the other, stated that the former is the...4~Z~-17~,cEt (president or other officer) and that 'the,Yatter is t .of grantor corporation and that the seal affixed hereto is )secretary or a officer) its seal'atra( thdt this d ed was voluntari y signed and sealed in behalf of the corporation by authority of its board of directors. ` Before me: G. Ll. 7-~.. {OFFICIALaS>tr:} Notary Public for Oregon. • , . •-My commission expires ........................1......................... /5'' I WARRANTY DEED CORPORATION First..Bapti t..Church..o.f..Tigard TO CQnservati4c--- Raptizt..Metro- pQl t ..M7.ss..i~c?n--SQC~ cty AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO 6 . Olld. F all 6ti, . J aw At at Law ti ,Z S 9047 . Glisan t ~44 P tland, egon 9729"* `I 7`X~?e, STATE OF OREGON County of Washingion ss D EX C 1-) I, Roger Thomssen, Director of Records and Elections and Ex-Officio Recorder of Conveyances (DON'T USE THIS for said county, do hereby certify that the within SPACEI RESERVED instrument of writing was received and recorded FOR RECORDING in book of records LABEL IN COON. ' No . TIES WHERE of said County "....,,35.•.•" USED.) Witness my hand and seal affixed. ROGER THOMSSEN, Director of Records Elections M910 10 16 AM %9 ~ Deputy 735 PnE 736 -'y • CONDITIONAL USE AND SUMMARY OF P FOR • NARRATIVE ROPOSAL FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF TIGARD 11075 SW GAARDE ST. TIGARD, OREGON 97223 8/3/04 REVISED 2/17/05 ARCHITECT-LA 805 SE SHERMAN ST PORTLAND, OR 97214 • Fl* BAPTIST CHURCH OF TIGARD CONDITIONAL USE NARRATIVE SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL This project consists of a 22,500 sq. ft. addition to Tigard First Baptist Church, and the addition of 114 parking spaces, to be constructed in three phases. Phase 1 consists of new on-site parking for 134 cars, street improvements to 110'h Avenue and related utilities and water quality facilities. No new access to Gaarde is planned under this phase Phase 2 consists of a new two story, 4450 sq. ft. addition connecting the existing Church and Ministry Buildings. Work includes the remodel of approximately 2115 sq. ft. of the existing Church Building. Included in this phase is the modification of the existing parking lot to provide access to the covered main entrance of the new addition, closing the existing access to Gaarde and constructing a new access to the phase 1 parking lot onto Gaarde. Phase 3 consists of a new two story, 18,000 sq. ft. Multi-Purpose Gymnasium Building. Work also includes the demolition of the existing 2300 sq. ft. Bolt Hall and parking for an additional 47 cars. Materials are planed to integrate the new addition with the existing church. This will provide a project with an overall uniform appearance that complements the neighborhood surrounding the church. IMPACT STUDY (Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) • Transportation System: A traffic engineer's study has been provided which confirms that the streets affected by this development, SW 110'h Ave. and Gaarde St., will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service. Bikeways will be provided in accordance with City of Tigard Development Code. • Drainage System: An existing storm drainage system exists on the western portion of the property which currently provides drainage for the site. The new development provides a new water quality swale to handle the storm water. • Parks System: The existing church on this site currently serves the surrounding community and no increase in park usage is expected as a result of this development • Water System: We have contacted the City of Tigard regarding the adequacy of water service at this site. We were assured that the existing public water system is adequate to serve this development. • Sewer System: The site is served by an existing 8 inch public sewer line which runs along the west portion of the property. This line has sufficient capacity to serve the new development.. • Noise Impacts: Following construction, no unusual or excessive noise is expected to be generated by this project beyond that which is normal for this type of use as compared to other churches in the area. • Bike Path Easement: We propose to provide a blanket easement within the boundaries of the natural resource area for the construction of the future bike path. APPROVAL CRITERIA FINDINGS Chapter 18.330 - Conditional Use • 18-330.030 - Approval Standards and Conditions of Approval: A.1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the proposed use. • Minimum lot size required: 20,000 sq. ft., 202.702 sq. ft. provided. • FIF* BAPTIST CHURCH OF TIGARD CONDITIONAL USE NARRATIVE A.2. The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography and natural features. The proposed facilities have been designed to fit within the required setbacks, to fit the slopes and so as not to encroach into the existing wetlands and vegetated community boundaries. A.3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. • Transportation System: A traffic engineer's study has been provided which confirms that the streets affected by this development, SW 1 101h Ave. and Gaarde St., will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service. Bikeways will be provided in accordance with City of Tigard Development Code. • Drainage System: An existing storm drainage system exists on the western portion of the property which currently provides drainage for the site. The new development provides a new water quality swale to handle the storm water. • Parks System: The existing church on this site currently serves the surrounding community and no increase in park usage is expected as a result of this development • Water System: We have contacted the City of Tigard regarding the adequacy of water service at this site. We were assured that the existing public water system is adequate to serve this development. • Sewer System: The site is served by an existing 8 inch public sewer line which runs along the west portion of the property. This line has sufficient capacity to serve the new development.. • Noise Impacts: Following construction, no unusual or excessive noise is expected to be generated by this project beyond that which is normal for this type of use as compared to other churches in the area. A.4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. See discussion of Chapter 18.510 below. A.S. The setbacks required by Chapter 18.330.050 are met as follows: • Front yard, corner lots: 20 ft. required. Existing buildings violate the 20 ft. setback along 110`h Avenue. New construction will be no closer than 20 ft. Setbacks along Gaarde are 32 ft. • Side and rear yard setbacks required: 20 ft. 134 ft. minimum provided. Chapter 18.360 - Site Development Review • 18.360.090 - Approval Criteria: A.2.a. Proposed new buildings have been designed and located with respect to the existing buildings, topography, site drainage, and vehicular and pedestrian traffic patterns. Trees have been preserved to the extent practical. A.4. Buffering and screening have been provided between this site and the adjoining residential properties as shown on the landscape plan and as discussed under paragraph 18.745 below. A.9. This project is designed for public access to the church facilities. Public sidewalks border the site and internal sidewalks connect to building entrances. A.10. All areas of the site are designed to be well lit and open to visual observation from all buildings as much as practical. A.11. This site is served by Tri-Met bus lines 94, 12 and 95. The nearest bus stop is approximately 1/4 mile away on SW Pacific Hwy. A.12. All landscaping has been designed in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 18.745. A minimum of 54% of the gross site area will be in landscaping as indicated on the landscape plan. 2 • FII8 BAPTIST CHURCH OF TIGARD CONDITIONAL USE NARRATIVE A.14. All provisions for the disabled have been designed in accordance with the requirements of ORS 447, Oregon Structural Specialty Code, Chapter 11, and Americans with Disabilities Act. Chapter 18.370 - Variances and Adjustments • 18.370.020 - Adjustments C.S. A new access is proposed on SW Gaarde Street, which is classified as an "arterial". The minimum spacing for streets and driveways along an arterial is 600 ft. The proposed driveway is shown 200 ft from the intersection of SW 110'" and SW Gaarde. due to the site constraints. The street frontage on Gaarde is approximately 328 ft. In addition there is a major drainage way on the west side of the property which makes access from the adjoining parcel impractical. The driveway has been located as far as practical from the intersection, and is the minimum required to provide adequate access. Visual clearances will be met. Chapter 18.510 - Residential Zoning Districts • 18.510.020 - List of Zoning Districts C. The site is zoned R-3.5, Low-Density Residential District. Religious Institutions are a conditional use within this zone. 18.510.050 - Development Standards Minimum lot size: 20,000 sq. ft. (modified by chapter 18.330.050,139) Actual lot size: 202,702 sq. ft. Average minimum lot width: 65 ft. Actual lot width: 328 ft. Minimum setbacks: Side facing streets on corner lots: 20 ft. Side yard: 20 ft. (modified by chapter 18.330.050,139) Rear yard: 20 ft. (modified by chapter 18.330.050,139) Proposed setbacks: Side facing streets: 20 ft. on 110th, 32 ft. on Gaarde Side yard: 381 ft to north, 123 ft to west Maximum height: 30 ft. Proposed height: 30 ft. • 18.510.060 - Accessory Structures No accessory structures are proposed. Chapter 18.705 - Access, Egress and Circulation • 18.705.030 - General Provisions D. Public street access: Three access drives are proposed. Two on 110th and one on Gaarde. The southern access drive on 110th is existing and will be retained. One additional driveway will be constructed to align with SW Garden Park Place as requested in the public meeting. The new access on Gaarde is to be located as far from the intersection of 100th and Gaarde as practical and will require an adjustment as outlined in Section 18.370 above. E. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N. F. Public sidewalks exist along both sides of 110th Ave. and generally along the north side of Gaarde St. New concrete walkways will be constructed as indicated on the site plan to connect all 3 • FIF*BAPTIST CHURCH OF TIGARD CONDITIONAL USE NARRATIVE buildings to each other, to parking areas and to public ways. Walkways will be 4 ft. minimum in width exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions and will comply with ADA standards. For public safety, walkways crossing parking access drives will be clearly marked with contrasting pavements or pavement markings. H. We are proposing to add another access point on SW 110'h and to relocate the existing access point on SW Gaarde further to the west to increase the distance from the intersection with 110'h Ave. Under Phase 1 development, the existing access drives from SW 110'h Ave. and SW Gaarde Street will be retained. The proposed new parking lot will add two new access points, one on 110'h and one on Gaarde. Access widths will be 30 ft., and pavement widths will be 24 ft. Under Phase 2 development, the access to the existing parking lot from Gaarde, which is closest to the 110`h Ave. intersection, will be removed. Under Phase 3 development, the original access from 110'h will be connected to the new parking lot, which was constructed under Phase 1. Chapter 18.725 - Environmental Performance Standards A. Noise: No excessive noise will be generated by this development. C. Vibrations: No detectable vibrations will be generated by this development. D. Odors: No detectable odors will be generated by this development. E. Glare and heat: There will be no discernable heat of glare generated by this development. F. Insects and rodents: Waste and garbage will be handled so as not to attract insects or rodents, or create a health hazard. Chapter 18.745 - Landscaping and Screening • 18.745.040 - Street Trees: Street trees at 30 ft. on centers will be provided along both 110'h and Gaarde Streets as required and as shown on the landscape plan. • 18.745.050 - Buffering and Screening: Screening for the parking areas are provided by hedges as shown on the landscape plan, in accordance with Buffer Matrix 18.745.1, Option D,1. Trees will be planted in the landscape islands at the rate of 1 per 7 parking spaces. Chapter 18.765 - Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements • 18.765.040 - General Design Standards Parking is based on the total number of seats in the main assembly area. Under phases 1 and 2 there is no planned expansion of the existing 280 seats in the existing sanctuary. Under phase 3 of the proposed development there will be a new assembly area constructed which will provide for a maximum of 550 seats. All new spaces are 90°, standard size. (8.5 x 15.5 ft. with 3 ft. bumper overhangs) Handicapped accessible spaces are provided in accordance with State of Oregon and federal standards. Phase 1 parking: 210 spaces (203 standard, 7 accessible) Phase 2 parking: 173 spaces (167 standard, 6 accessible) Phase 3 parking: 190 spaces (184 standard, 6 accessible) • 18.765.050 - Bicycle Parking Design Standards: A. Location and access: Bicycle parking will be provided near the main entrances to the builildings. Spaces for 14 bicycles are required based on 280 seats in the main sanctuary. 5 spaces will provided under phase 1, 5 additional covered space will be provided under the entry canopy under phase 2, and 5 additional spaces will be provided inside the new building under phase 3. C Design requirements: Bicycle racks will be steel tube, ribbon type, securely anchored to the concrete slabs on which they are mounted. 4 • FIR APTIST CHURCH OF TIGARD ONDITIONAL USE NARRATIVE 18.765.080 - Off-Street Loading Requirements: This church facility does not regularly receive or distribute material or merchandise by truck, therefore no dedicated truck loading area is required. Passenger loading and drop-off areas are provided. Chapter 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage • 18.755.040 - Methods of Demonstrating Compliance: The church will contract with Pride Disposal Company, a franchise hauler, for trash removal and recycling. A letter from Pride Disposal Company is attached. Chapter 18.775 - Sensitive Lands One Water Quality Sensitive Area (WQSA), a perennial tributary to Fanno Creek, occurs in the western portion of the site. The vegetated corridor extends to the entire site west of the tributary. It also extends a variable distance (approximately 50 to 70 ft. upslope from the WQSA, depending on slope. The vegetated corridor is listed as "degraded" or "marginal" throughout the site, mainly due to high percent cover by invasive Armenian blackberry. No development is proposed within the required buffer to the WQSA. A retaining wall be constructed at the west edge of the proposed parking as shown on civil drawings and as required by Clean Water Services. Chapter 18.780 - Signs No new signs are proposed Chapter 18.790 - Tree Removal • 18.790.030 - Tree Plan Requirements An arborist's report and protection plan has been provided which confirms that the 10 trees that are to be affected by the proposed site development are all non-viable trees due to structural defects, dead, dying or diseased. The remaining 33 existing trees, (some of which are non-viable) are to be retained. Therefore all viable trees will be retained and protected. New landscaping will add a significant number of new trees. Chapter 18.795 - Visual Clearance Areas As outlined on page 6 of the traffic analysis, the existing and proposed driveway locations on Gaarde Street and SW 110`h Ave. have sight distances that exceed AASHTO minimum recommendations. Vision clearance triangles are shown on the Landscape Plan. 5 • Natural Resource Assessment Report Tigard First Baptist Church Washington County Tigard, Oregon Prepared for Tigard First Baptist Church - April 23, 2004 ~ EVANS AND ASSOCIATES INC. i'~ CLEAN WATER SERVICES Sensitive Areas Certification Property Owner Name Tigard First Baptist Church Address 11075 SW Gaarde Street City/State/Zip Tigard, Oregon 97223 I Telephone Fax 503-639-3913 E-mail Authorized Agent Name Larry Abell- Architect, Inc Address 805 SE Sherman St. City/State/Zip Portland, OR 97214 Telephone Fax 503-231-1122 503-231-0317 E-mail Project Location Street, road, or other descriptive location 11075 SW Gaarde Street Quarter SE Section 3 Township 2 South Range 1 West In or near (city or town) County Tax Map # Tax Lot # Tigard Washin ton 2S103DC 1100 Waterway River Mile Latitude Longitude Unnamed bib to Fanno Cr N/A 45.41 °N 122.79°W Adjacent Project Information Street, road, or other descriptive location r Quarter Section Township Range In or near (city or town) County Tax Map # Tax Lot Waterway River Mile Latitude Longitude ' An on-site, water-quality-sensitive areas reconnaissance was completed on: Date By Title Company 2/11/04 Phil Rickus Ecologist DEA A. Existence of Water-Quality-Sensitive Areas As defined in Section 3.06.1 of the Clean Water Service's Title 3 Compliance/CWS Design and Construction Standards, water-quality-sensitive areas: ® do ❑ do not exist on site (check appropriate box). • If water-quality-sensitive areas exist, complete Section B below. • If water-quality-sensitive areas do not exist, skip Section B, sign this form and submit to CWS with plan approval package. B. Types of Water-Quality-Sensitive Areas The type(s) of water-quality-sensitive area(s) that occur on site are (check all that apply : ® wetland(s) ❑ seep(s) ❑ intermittent stream(s) ® perennial stream(s) ❑ ponds Sign this form and submit to CWS with plan approval package and one (1) copy of: 7 . Wetland Delineation Report (if wetlands occur on site) . Vegetated Corridor Conditions Report, including a base map showing the location of all water-quality-sensitive areas, vegetated corridors, and condition of vegetated corridors I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this document, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, this information is true, complete, and accurate. Property Owner: Print/Type Name Print/Type Title Signature Title Date Natural Resource Assessment Report Tigard First Baptist Church Washington County Tigard, Oregon Prepared for Tigard First Baptist Church 11075 SW Gaarde Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Prepared by ? David Evans and Associates, Inc. J 2100 SW River Parkway Portland, Oregon 97201 April 23, 2004 1 Tigard First Baptist Church Amok AdIkaturaI Resource Assessment Report Mw 1w 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 SITE DESCRIPTION 1 3 METHODS ..............................................................................................................................................1 4 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................................3 4.1 ON-SITE WATER QUALITY SENSITIVE AREAS ...........................................................................................3 4.2 OFF-SITE WATER QUALITY SENSITIVE AREAS 3 4.3 VEGETATED CORRIDOR PLANT COMMUNITIES ........................................................................................3 4.3.1 Description, Location, and Condition ......................................................................................................3 4.3.2 Vegetated Corridor Widths 5 5 PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION 7 6 SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................................................8 7 PREPARERS ...........................................................................................................................................8 8 BIBLIOGRAPHY .....................................................................................................................................9 APPENDICES 10 APPENDIX A - WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORMS APPENDIX B - SITE PHOTOGRAPHS LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Project Vicinity 2 Figure 2. Natural Resource Assessment Map 6 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Vegetated Community A, as Sampled at Plot A 4 Table 2. Vegetated Community B, as Sampled at Plot B 5 Table 3. Vegetated Community C, as Sampled at Plot C 5 April 23, 2004 Page i Tigard First Baptist Church • W ural Resource Assessment Report 1 INTRODUCTION j The First Baptist Church of Tigard, Oregon (the church), retained David Evans and Associates, Inc. (DEA) to evaluate the water quality sensitive areas and vegetated corridor conditions at the church as described in the Clean Water Services (CWS) > Design and Construction Standards Manual (CWS 2003). This report evaluates on-site water quality areas and vegetated buffers in accordance with methods outlined in Appendix C, Natural Resource Assessments, of CWS Design and Construction Standards Manual (CWS 2003). The church plans to construct a new sanctuary and parking lot on Tax Lot 1100. The Standard Site Assessment Method was necessary because the planned project adds more than 500 square feet of impervious surface. 2 SITE DESCRIPTION The project area lies on the corner of Gaarde Street and SW 1100' Avenue in the City of Tigard in Washington County, Oregon. The project is located in Section 3, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian. (Figure 1). The study area slopes west toward an unnamed tributary that flows into Fanno Creek approximately one mile to the northeast. A narrow band of wetland, which lies on either side of the creek in places, includes occasional mature or mid-mature red alder (Alnus rubra). Young forest dominated by Douglas hawthorn (Crataegus douglasii) lies upslope of the channel in the 3 southern portion, while a mature Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) forest lies upslope of the channel to the north. Armenian (i.e., "Himalayan") blackberry (Rubus armeniacus) i dominates the understory of all areas except the maintained lawn. A maintained lawn dominated by Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) reaches from the edge of the forest upslope to the existing church and parking areas. Surrounding areas have been converted to commercial and residential uses. Other than the creek and associated forest, the surrounding landscape is dominated by residences and lawns, parking lots, and commercial buildings. 3 METHODS Prior to the field investigation, reference materials were reviewed to provide information regarding the possible presence of wetlands, water features, hydric soils, wetland hydrology, and site topography. Soils and wetland inventory ,naps are inCI ded in a separate wetland delineation document. Data sheets from the wetland delineation are included in Appendix A. The materials reviewed included: • Beaverton, Oregon, 15 minute Quadrangle, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), 1984 • Soil Survey of Washington County Area, Oregon, U.S. Soil Conservation Service (SCS), (USDA 1982) April 23, 2004 Page 1 i I i } J , j. _j 'l Tigard First Baptist Church • • \ : 9 Metzger y 5 s.. Pro ect Area 4 fir y...>>,..1.• • 1 1 • A I 1. 4 3 n n 200 f>~ • ` . ° . 33 39 00 I~ .II'~1 • i Project Area I I 'I• HIV a ,s- -'L • '_L-:I~' ~ r~ ~ t \W i? TT Eli '~1" rr/ ' p •2 0 ; a~ II • • ~ / f~ u ` i1 USGS 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Series Beaverton, Oregon 1961 Figure 1 Vicinity Map v CO Scale - 1 : 24 000 Q Tigard First Baptist Church •atural Resource Assessment Report • National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Beaverton, Oregon, 1981 • Local Wetland Inventory (LWI), Tigard, Oregon, 1994 DEA delineated the extent of water quality sensitive areas (WQSA) on June 10, 2003. The perennial tributary located in the western portion of the study area was investigated, and the channel and associated wetlands were delineated. Slopes rising from the tributary were measured, and tree species and vegetative buffers were analyzed. i Plant communities were assessed at three representative data sample plots following methods outlined in the CWS Design and Construction Standards Manual (CWS 2003). Adjacent properties were analyzed within 200 feet to determine if any WQSA might require a vegetative buffer within the study area. The entire project site was photographed; selected site photographs are included in Appendix B. The remaining photographs are available from DEA. 4 RESULTS 4.1 ON-SITE WATER QUALITY SENSITIVE AREAS The study area slopes west toward an unnamed tributary that flows into Fanno Creek approximately one mile to the northeast. Much of the creek is channelized, but narrow } patches of wetland lie on either side of the creek in places, with a few mature or mid- mature red alder growing at the base of the slope. A portion of the channel is visible in Photo 2 (Appendix B). The Tigard LWI identifies the tributary as a "USA Water Quality Buffer," although it does not map the tributary all the way to the southern border of the } property, as it exists on site. 4.2 OFF-SITE WATER QUALITY SENSITIVE AREAS Adjacent properties were analyzed to determine if any WQSA might require a vegetative corridor within the study area. The sensitive area (tributary) found on the site continues off-site to the north and south. Therefore, the buffer would theoretically continue to run 50 feet parallel to creek off the property. However, the off-site buffers would not change buffer size within the project area. No springs or other WQSAs were found which would affect vegetated corridors within the project area property. 4.3 VEGETATED CORRIDOR PLANT COMMUNITIES 4.3.1 Description, Location, and Condition The on-site investigation of vegetated corridors within the project study area resulted in the identification of three vegetated communities. They include: • Community A, a scrub forest dominated by red alder, Douglas hawthorn, and i Armenian blackberry '-i April 23, 2004 Page 3 Tigard First Baptist Church , Gatural Resource Assessment Report Community B, a forest dominated by Douglas fir and Armenian blackberry Community C, a maintained lawn dominated by Kentucky bluegrass A description of each plant community along with a representative species list is provided below. The location of each community is depicted in Figure 2. J 4.3.1.1 Vegetated Community A: Scrub Forest Vegetated Community A is associated with the perennial tributary in the western portion of the property. A strip of young trees less than 20 feet tall exists east of the tributary, consisting mainly of Douglas hawthorn and red alder. Armenian blackberry dominates the understory. Table 1 provides a representative sample plot for Plant Community A, as sampled at Plot A. Other areas identified as Plant Community A may contain different, though similar, plant species and percentage cover values. All areas identified as Plant Community A were considered to be in a "degraded" condition due to the lack of canopy cover and presence of greater than 20% cover by invasive species. Table 1. Vegetated Community A, as Sampled at Plot A. Scientific Name Common Name % Cover Stratum Status Crataegus douglasii Douglas hawthorn 20 S Native Alnus rubra Red alder 30 S Native Rubus armeniacus Armenian blackberry 60 S Invasive Total 110 Canopy Cover = 0% Condition = Degraded Non-native, Noxious or Invasive = 55% Native = 45% 4.3.1.2 Vegetated Community B: Douglas Fir Forest Vegetated Community B lies on both sides of the perennial tributary in the western portion of the property. A mature overstory of Douglas fir provides cover for a variety of understory species including Douglas hawthorn, red alder, bitter cherry (Prunus emarginata), and beaked hazelnut (Corylus cornuta). The understory is dominated by Armenian blackberry, with some trailing blackberry (Rubus ursinus) and swordfem (Polystichum munitum). Table 2 provides a representative sample plot for Plant Community B, as sampled at Plot B. All areas identified as Plant Community B were considered to be in a "marginal" condition due to the combination of natives covering greater than 50% but less than 80% of the area, and canopy cover greater than 26%.. April 23, 2004 Page 4 Tigard First Baptist Church is &atural Resource Assessment Report Table 2. Vegetated Community 8, as Sampled at Plot B. Scientific Name Common Name % Cover Stratum Status Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir 85 T Native Alnus rubra Red alder 5 T Native 1 Crataegus douglasii Douglas hawthorn 5 S Native Rubus ammeniacus Armenian blackberry 60 S Invasive Prunus emarginata Bitter cherry 5 S Native l Corylus comuta Beaked hazelnut 10 S Native Rubus ursinus Trailing blackberry 5 H Native Polystichum munitum Swordfern 5 H Native Total 180 1 Canopy Cover = 90% Non-native, Noxious or In vasive = 33% (601180) Condition = Marginal Native = 67% (1201180) 4.3.1.3 Vegetated Community C: Maintained lawn This vegetated community is dominated by Kentucky bluegrass. A few cultivated trees lie within it, but constitute less than 1% of the overall area. The grass is mowed and well-maintained. All areas identified as Plant Community C were considered to be in a "degraded" condition due to the lack of canopy cover and dominance of non-native species. Table 3 provides a representative sample plot for Plant Community. C, as sampled at Plot C. Table 3. Vegetated Community C, as Sampled at Plot C Scientific Name Common Name % Cover Stratum Status Poa pratensis Kentucky bluegrass 100 H Non-native Total 100 Canopy Cover = 0% Condition = Degraded 4.3.2 Vegetated Corridor Widths Non-native, Noxious or Invasive = 100% Native = 0% Vegetated corridor widths were determined based on the methodology outlined in Chapter 3 of CWS Design and Construction Standards Manual (CWS 2003). This methodology uses drainage area, flow regime (i.e., perennial or intermittent), and the gradient of adjacent slopes to determine vegetated corridor widths. Widths can range from a minimum of 15 feet to a maximum of 200 feet. April 23, 2004 . Page 5 ~LP.'/ 'd" ~G~" ® i~ I ~f6~ 'Fil✓ `tom/ '~'Y C~J `O.~D' ~Y ~i ' ~£1' B'a4/ `~C-~ W V V7 ~V j../ C.% `re J• W FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD BIKE PATH EASEMENT PLOT 6 8" IRON ROD OW PLASTIC CAP "T. BURTON LS 590" N OR N w a M O Z PLOT5 00 S89'59'46"E 73.27' Off` 0 PLOT 3 w °v SAN MH 'cn 2 PLOT 4 PLOT B PLOT 2- PLOT 1-~ COMMUNITY B IV - ~ Nr ,11111 GF A~L SHOP 5' HIGH WOOD FENCE 0 w 0 0 b ° vt ) FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "T. BURTON LS ° 75.50' 133.15' S89'56'00"W 108.65' NOTE: BOUNDARY LINES ARE FOR GRAPHICAL FOUND WITH 5/8'1 PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED .ryTh STAMPED INU TO REPRESENT PROPERTY LINES FOUND 5/8- IRON ROD 99.09' WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP - [SAN H w, ^ , ` f; 1 : ~.\1_.. • 228 - W 0; o NMv N ry N ti NN NN y`> ryry0 . L,' ry~ g O 229.-.. 22,30 l N p u+ t l ! 232 230 r' r ~ r y t N V i4 -1P %i1 . r f,•.• c - 237 r i 233.... - • 232 _ / - 234 - I 23 !1 f'r;FIRL' ' c/-~'" 235 r 3 j i E=, CF' r "L ICJ 234. • BRUSH LIVE - .237 235._ I1 2g9 _ . . 237 ~48' SIR ; i2"'FtR _4 FOUP:D-5/8"IRON 238 - C MMUNITY. 239 WITH YELLOW PLAT ! f '240- 244- 241 . A MH ?4" FiR 12": 'FIR -242.. r r t t r tag CATCHBASIN 24,. FIR 244- / 245 r; ,36"r EIR' j 248. 1 l~ J r !r IRI RE, 248 Edq~F SF R;4SS'A P, f, Jf ! fob ~ Flk/ , , $ ~ (1 f r rl f , , r/. f"_• / , 2 _ ?49 . (O %Flp~ r/(, r r ;12" PIE 10" PINE Irv ' r 110' PI~ E f O 01 I i jI rY~ ry~~.. ' S X10 I N. ryrN~NNN i'r,11 nN N , PLO Ti`, . , r f n/j•~ BOLT HALL C. 2.'PINE r' I t 2 Z~ ( N N 8 Fr .4 i N N`~ n N ,'ry~ a / 10° HA,.ORN H" !ryry S c W rya J(/\'{3) 12 ':MAPLE:. GRASS AREA CONCRETE I 2S RAMP-' l-'' I Ir ED(' OF;Gfjp'S XREA: 0 `14" PINE AC N ?S 11 ' ;J N ~rn N R ci j, -11 f 1,1 ,O 10" PINE; c~ 0.'FIR. f J / 35' / % HANDICAP t t r1 - t PARKING T N '18 1 3' PVC i t SIGNS 2 01 FIR) / STORM' OU117ALL FIR r l BU' IED'F OF Pld~l AC PA7 H iTil f I! I+ CLEANOUT J j r ! 4" AREA DRAIN QS 10" WIDE Z ! i... f ` t It i'r,,. I EI i AC KEY STONE 1t' t,tt ilc C / ;i+;1 I i IS i~i / WALL m j!( 1 ' h 1 'ORM OUTFALL I i' ! i ' ! ) > t E' j 6"; CLEANOUT I ! STEPS N 4" 'C;LEIP,P1 FOUND 5/8' + CLEANOUT 10" WIDE , IRON ROD I i i I IN IpMt~ tl " TYt D~ i t BURIED ROOF GRAIN W KEY ALLSTONE Q ' ry 1 ~l T FF 257.17' i t t 11 CLVS ER' 4• ; GRA FfF,+ - S ,II, t l)I 4LD 1c 'j I _ CONCRET 20" CE DAf I a ` 'I' a 111 BURIED 7AN, t K o t l I :I 1 STEPS N1 STEP PLOT; ,A 10' WIDE 61 lid NNNNMV 1ryr.: U1~ t NNNN: N STEPS 4WQ t1 ` W N ro CLEANOU r FIGURE 2 iti ilkI{i rt jl, , ' ry d, AC NATURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT cl- i 10' WIDE KEY STONE BREAK IN SLOPE frfir r fl` WALL bKE PATH! i • I i STEPS S : EASEMENT: - COMMUNITY BOUNDARY : 10MUNI Y"", 2$0 RASA AREA t A: f PARKING " PTO O COMMUNITY PLOT GRAVEL I!I?l,rl% / j r'` r r f I ALL 24 ® WETLAND PLOT Jlij/j1 %i'; r'r'.f~%• + 6".~'16H f~ ~ l'' ~ 248. WQSA BOUNDARY i PIN l :247. MAIN DRIVE 0 25 50 100 FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP 'P RTO C "T DAVID EVANS m oASSOCIATES iNO. 2100 Southwest River Parkway Portland Ore gon 07201 Phone: 503.223.6663 PROJECT TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST SHEET TITLE NATURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT 1 DWG. REF. PROJECT SCALE DRAWN BY DESIGN BY APPROVED BY AMENDMENT NO. DATE OF TFBC 0000-0001 1:50 02-2004 1 T: \Dm\TFB00001\TFB000001\dwg\TFB00001-NRAssessment.dwg Apr 20, 2004 - 10:08am Mmf Tigard First Baptist Church . Satural Resource Assessment Report The vegetative corridor within subject property is located on either'side of the unnamed tributary. The corridor width west of the tributary is variable and extends all the way to the property boundary. East of the tributary, most of the corridor lies within moderately steep slopes (less than 25%), and corridor widths are 50 feet. One portion of the forest east of the tributary contains slopes greater than 25%. In this steeper area, the vegetative corridor is about 70 feet wide and runs above the break in slope that occurs at the edge of Vegetated Community B, near the center of the property (Figure 2). 5 PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION Under Chapter 3, heading 3.02.05 of CWS Storm Water and Surface Rules, general enhancement of the vegetated corridor is required whether a project impacts the vegetated corridor or not. Rule 3.02.5 d. states that "The Vegetated Corridor shall be protected and enhanced by the Applicant in accordance with the requirements listed in Table 3.2 and Appendix E: Landscape Requirements of CWS Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management. For Vegetated Corridors 50 feet and greater, the first 50 l feet closest to the Sensitive Area shall be upgraded to a condition equal to or better than a `good' corridor condition as defined in Table 3.2..." (emphasis added). The condition of the vegetative corridor within subject property is categorized as degraded and marginal. Therefore, the entire vegetated corridor on the subject property within 50 feet of the WQSA must be improved per requirements of Table 3.2, which requires the following: Remove any invasive or non-native species within the corridor by hand or mechanically as appropriate (Only small equipment is allowed in j Marginal areas, but small equipment would likely be most appropriate in all areas of the site). Provide District or City with a native plant revegetation plan appropriate to the site conditions developed by an ecologist/biologist or landscape architect to restore to a good corridor condition (emphasis ^J added). Vegetate corridor to establish `good' corridor conditions. In addition, if the project encroaches on the vegetated corridor, vegetated corridor reduction, averaging, and mitigation will need to occur as outlined by CWS (CWS 2003) and will need to be documented in the revegetation plan discussed above. . Finally, one portion of the forest east of the tributary contains slopes greater than 25%. In this steeper area, the vegetative corridor is about 70 feet wide and runs above the break in slope that occurs at the edge of Vegetated Community B, near the center of the property (Figure 2). It is possible to modify the width of the vegetated corridor if it is certified to be in degraded or marginal condition. April 23, 2004 Page 7 Tigard First Baptist Church • &atural Resource Assessment Report Where the outside edge of the vegetated corridor has been set at 35 feet past the break in slope, the 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet providing that the remaining Vegetated Corridor is not less than 50 feet wide and a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability can be maintained with the reduced setback from the break in slope. i In this case, a portion of Community C that currently extends 35 feet from the break in slope may be reduced to 15 feet from the break in slope line with a stamped 'l geotechnical report. However, the corridor cannot be reduced to less than the minimum 50 feet without corridor averaging. 6 SUMMARY One WQSA, a perennial tributary to Fanno Creek, occurs in the western portion of the s study area. The vegetated corridor extends to the entire subject property west of the tributary. It also extends a variable distance (approximately 50 to 70 feet upslope (east) from the WQSA, depending on slope (Figure 2). A portion of Community C that currently extends 35 feet from the break in slope may be reduced to 15 feet from the break in slope line with a stamped geotechnical report. Vegetated corridor condition is listed as Degraded or Marginal throughout the project area, mainly due to high percent cover by invasive Armenian blackberry. 7 PREPARERS Phil Rickus, DEA Ecologist, and Joe Zimmerman, DEA Environmental Specialist, performed the site assessment. Mr. Rickus is the principal author of this report. Kevin O'Hara provided Total Quality Management reviews of this report. Sharon Johnson, DEA Project Assistant, edited all report drafts. Melissa, Foltz, DEA Project Assistant, provided the report graphics. AM- Preparer Reviewer April 23, 2004 Page 8 Tigard First Baptist Church , &atural Resource Assessment Report 8 BIBLIOGRAPHY Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Oregon Department of Agriculture. Oregon's Quarantine Against Noxious Weeds. Accessed on the internet, June 12, 2003. http://www.oda.state.or.us/Plant/weed control/weedlistcommon.html Clean Water Services (CWS). 2003. Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management. Sutherlin Local Wetland Inventory (LWI), Tigard, Oregon. 1994 U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service. 1982. Soil Survey of Washington County, Oregon. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Office of Biological Services. 1992. National Wetlands Inventory, Hillsboro, Oregon, quadrangle map. 1981. National Wetlands Inventory, Beaverton, Oregon. U.S. Fish and. Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services. U.S. Geological Service (USGS). 1984. Beaverton, Oregon, 15 minute Quadrangle. 0:\PROJECIIT\Tfbc0000-0001\!DOCS\907 Natural Resource Assessment\F1NAL1fbcNRASrpt.doc April 23, 2004 Page 9 esource Assessment Repo l R `Natura - rd First Baptist Church APPENDICES Y ~~ll f '.1 e Assessment ReP~ort Resourc tist Church Tigard First Bap N ~qTA FARMS SIX q _ WETLAND DELlNEgT14 App EN 1 ~'1 DAT4RM- ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINOON M027 r`n= IA/aHan`/e nalinaafinn IlAannall Applicant/owner: Tigard First Baptist Church County: Washington Investigator. Joe Zimmerman, Phil Rictus State: Oregon Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ® Yes ❑ No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ❑ Yes ® No Transect ID: Is Area a Potential Problem Area? ❑ Yes ® No Plot ID: 1 1 ❑ n.. 1 ® Phalaris arundinacea FACW 100 2 ❑ 2 ❑ Ranunculus repens FACW 5 3 ❑ 3 ❑ 4 ❑ 4 ❑ Total Tree Cover: 5 ❑ v 1 Rubus armeniacus ® FACLI 15 7 ❑ 2 ® Alnus rubra FAC 5 8 ❑ 3 ❑ 9 ❑ 4 ❑ 10 ❑ 5 ❑ Total Herb Cover 100 Total Sap/Shrub Cover: 20 % of Dom. Species =OBL, FACW or FAC excluding FAC-): 66 Plot lies at the base of a slope adjacent to a small creek. Remarks: LA r%13^1 rVIV ❑ Recorded Data (describe in Remarks) Welland Hydrology Indicators: ❑ ❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Aerial Photographs Prima ❑ Indicators: Inundated Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12" ❑ Other ® Saturated in Upper 12 inches ❑ Water-Stained Leaves ® No recorded data available ❑ Water Marks ❑ Local Soil Survey Data Field Observations: ❑ Drift Lines ❑ FAC-Neutral Test D epth of Surface Water. None (In.) ❑ Sediment Deposits ❑ Other (explain in remarks) Depth to Free Water in Pit: >16 Depth to Saturated Soil: 4 (In.) (In.) ® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands ❑ Rem arks: enu c Ma Unit Name series and Phase : Cove silt clay loam Drainage Class: Poorly drained Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Y ® N ❑ Depth nches Horizon Matrix Color Munsell Moist Mottle Colors Munsell Moist Mottle Abundance/ Size/Contrast Texture, Concretions Structure, etc. 0-16 10YR 3/2 7.5YR 4/6 man /coarse/disfinct Silty day loam H tic Soil Indicators: ❑ Histosol ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ Sulf'idic Odor ❑ Aquic Moisture Regime ® Redox Features (w/in 107 ❑ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ❑ Concretions (wlin 3', >2mm) ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ ® ® ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Listed on National Hydric Soils List Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remarks) Remarks: DETERMINATION [Tffiwa&S'641~s' Pit Remarks: O:IPROJECTI7ITFB00000-00011IDOCSI918 WETLAND DELINEATIONIDATA SHEETSITFBCPLOT 01 W.DOC ' DATA•RM- ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINAN 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual Applicant/Owner ITigard First Baptist Church County: Washington l J i } 1 J } HYDROLOGY J El Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Prima Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): 1 11 Other ❑ saturated in Upper 12 inches ❑ Water-Stained Leaves i SOILS 1 Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Y ® N ❑ } Depth inches Horizon Munsell Moist) Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure etc. <v WETLAND DETERMINATION 1*,)) .:1 +bM r]2%dcA iSM - tt' F 1 . " l n r srs' ' 'c r m r• a Yrx' .a~Y.gyr i . ~ s if NCa+' Tw-a 3. > 3ae arid.. ~t, r WAY Remarks: y O- PROJECTITITFB00000-00011IDOCSW I8 WETLAND DELI~ ~NEATIONIDATA ^ "Y SHEETSITFBCPLOT 02 U.DOC Investigator: Joe Zimmerman, Phil Ridcus State: Oregon Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ® Yes ❑ No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation ? ❑ - Yes ® No Transed ID: Is Area a Potential Problem Area? FT T Yes ® No Plot ID: 2 1 A ® Pseudotsuga menziesii n UPL 70 1 ~ ® Polystichum 'munitum FACU 20 2 ❑ 2 ❑ 3 ❑ 3 ❑ 4 ❑ 4 ❑ Total Tree Cover: 70 5 ❑ 1 ® Rubus armeniacus FACU 50 7 ❑ 2 ❑ Crataegus douglasii FAC 10 8 ❑ 3 [1 9 ❑ 4 ❑ 10 ❑ 5 ❑ Total Herb Cover 20 Total Sap/Shrub Cover: 60 % of Dom. Species =06L, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): 0 Plot lies upslope of a small creek. Remarks: ❑ Recorded Data (describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators: ❑ Aerial Photographs ❑ Inundated ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12" ® No recorded data available ❑ Water Marks ❑ Local Soil Survey Data Field Observations: ❑ Drift Lines ❑ FAC-Neutral Test Depth of Surface Water. None (In.) ❑ Sediment Deposits ❑ Other (explain in remarks) Depth to Free Water in Pit: >16 Depth to Saturated Soil: >16 (In.) (In.) ❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands ❑ Re marks: _ Ma Unit Name series and Phase : Woodburn silt loam Drainage Class: Moderately well-drained Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance! 0-16 10YR 312 none none Silt loam ric Soil Indicators: ❑ Histosol ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ Sulfdic Odor U Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ I U I ~ I U I Redox Features (w!n 10") Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Concretions (wfin 3', >2mm) Organic Streaking in Sandy Sons; ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List I ❑ I Other (explain in remarks) Remarks: j DAT*RM- ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINSON 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual Wag } I ,l 1 1 1 } } 1 HYDROLOGY i } } SOILS l Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Y ® N ❑ 1 =Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance) Depth ruches Horizon Mansell Moist Mansell Moist Size/Contrast Texture Concretions, Structure, etc. 1 .l WETLAND DETERMINATION WIN R71-77 ~ " tt+c.. ......a, `i_ , . ° ~«u.< . - ~ ~ & . ~ .~~../2 Yam r Remarks: - O:IPROJECT1'nTFBCOOOO-00011rDOCS1918 WETLAND DELINEATIONIDATA SHEETSITFBCPLOT 03 W.DOC Ap IicanUOt+mer: r'rgard t Baptist Church County: Washington Investigator. rman, Phil Ridc us State: Oregon Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ® Yes ❑ No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed Atypical Situation)? ❑ Yes ® No Transed ID: Is Area a Potential Problem Area? ❑ Yes ® No Plot ID: 3 1 ❑ 1 ® Phalaris arundinacea FACW 90 2 ❑ 2 ® Ranunculus repens FACW 25 3 ❑ 3 ❑ 4 ❑ 4 ❑ Total Tree Cover. 5 ❑ 1 ® Rubus armeniatxts FACU 15 7 ❑ 2 ❑ 8 ❑ 3 ❑ 9 ❑ g ❑ 10 ❑ _ 5 ❑ Total Herb Cover 115 Total Sap/Shrub Cover: 15 % of Dom. Species =OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): 66 Plot lies at the base of a slope adjacent to a small creek. Remarks: ❑ Recorded Data (describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators: ❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge ❑ Aerial Photographs Prima ❑ Indicators: Inundated Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12" ❑ Other ® Saturated in Upper 12 inches ❑ Water-Stained Leaves ® No recorded data available ❑ Water Marks ❑ Local Soil Survey Data Field Observations: ❑ Drift Lines ❑ FAC-Neutral Test Depth of Surface Water. None (In.) El Sediment Deposits ❑ Other (explain in remarks) Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18 Depth to Saturated Soil: at surface (In.) (In.) ® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands ❑ Remarks: Ma Unit Name series and Phase : Cove silty clay loam Drainage Class: Poorly drained 0.16 10YR 312 7.5YR M6 many/coarse/distinct Silty clay loam H ric Soil Indicators: O Histosol ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Aquic Moisture Regime ® Redox Features (w/in 107 ❑ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ❑ Concretions (wfin 3", >2mm) [I Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ ® ® ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Listed on National Hydnc Soils List Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remarks) Remarks: : DATA&RM- ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINOON /iOR7 rfW Wnftancfe MfinPafinn Manuatt l I e ApplicanUOwner. J-'7~~4~~ tl4. Tigard First Baptist Church a County: W Washington Investigator. Joe Zimmerman, Phil Ridws State: Oregon Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ® Yes ❑ No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation? ❑ Yes I N No Transect ID: Is Area a Potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: 4 1 ® Pseudotsuga menziesii UPL 80 1 ® Polystichum munitum FACU 5 2 ❑ 2 ❑ 3 ❑ 3 ❑ 4 ❑ 4 ❑ Total Tree Cover: 80 5 ❑ I VO N- a . " is 6 ❑ 1 ® Rubus armeniacus FACU 50 7 ❑ 2 ❑ 8 ❑ 3 ❑ 9 ❑ 4 ❑ 10 ❑ 5 ❑ Total Herb Cover 5 Total Sap/Shrub Cover. 50 % of Dom. Species =OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): 0 Plot lies upslope of a small creek. Remarks: HYDROLOGY ❑ Recorded Data (describe in Remarks) ❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge ❑ Aerial Photographs ❑ Other Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Prima Indicators: ❑ Inundated ❑ Saturated in Upper 12 inches ❑ Water Marks ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Sediment Deposits ❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12" ❑ Water-Stained Leaves ❑ Local Soil Survey Data ❑ FAC-Neutral Test ❑ Other (explain in remarks) Field Observations: Depth of Surface Water. None (In.) Depth to Free Water in Pit: >16 (In.) Depth to Saturated Soil: >16 (In.) Remarks: i emu e Ma Unit Name series and Phase : Woodburn silt loam Drainage Class: Moderately well-drained Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Y ® N ❑ Depth inches Horizon Matrix Color Munsell Moist Mottle Colors Munsell Moist Mottle Abundance/ Size/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc. 0-16 10YR 3/2 none none Silt loam I H dric Soil Indicators: ❑ Histosoi ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Redox Features (wfin 10. Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Concretions (w!n 3", >2mm) Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ❑ Other (explain in remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION avers t xnxs. - .3;.r Hvdf3d I&iT~etaEion,Pre' ~Sent'e:L' Remarks: O:IPROJECT171TFBCoooo-oo01LrDOCSlg1a WETLAND DELINEA77OMDATA SHEETSITFBCPLOT 04 U.DOC DATARM- ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMIAON 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual KIT -3301. NO JEWIPM 3 l 1 VEGF ATION MR 1 01 - 2 11 i HYDROLOGY Field Observations: ❑ Drift Lines ❑ FAC-Neutral Test j SOILS Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? YO NO Depth Cinches) Horizon Munsell Mast Munsell Moist) Size/Conbast Texture Concretions, Structure, etc. it [I Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Other (explain in remarks) I WETLAND DETERMINATION ,9g A H ~cwasve uma ~z..~ so. .rce, t„~:a3_vsk aGVrao st~x,~~ ea ,,,a,.z a ~ :J jarzwax NOW 31 Sol iit~? z ,No Remarks: .-r O:IPROJECTITITFB00000-OOO1lrDOCSt918 WETLAND DELINEATIONIDATA SHEETMTFBCPLOT 06 U.DOC Ap IicanUOwner. Tigard First Baptist Church County: Washington Investigator. Joe Zimmerman, Phil Ridcus State: Oregon Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ® Yes ❑ No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation ? ❑ Yes ® No Transect ID: Is Area a Potential Problem Area? ❑ Yes ® No Plot ID: 6 1 ® ryPseudotsuga menziesii UPL ~ 80 1 ® Polystichum munitum FACU 10 2 g ❑ 3 11 q ❑ 4 El Total Tree Cover: 80 5 ❑ 1 ® Rubus armeniacus FACU 50 7 ❑ 2 ® Corylus comuta FACU 20 8 ❑ 3 ❑ g ❑ q ❑ 10 ❑ 5 ❑ Total Herb Cover 10 Total Sap/Shrub Cover: 70 % of Dom. Species =06L, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): 0 Plot lies upslope of a small creek. Remarks: ❑ Recorded Data (describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators: ❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Prima Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): ❑ ❑ Aerial Photographs Other ❑ ❑ Inundated Saturated in Upper 12 inches ❑ ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12° Water-Stained Leaves ® No recorded data available ❑ Water Marks ❑ Local Soil Survey Data Depth of Surface Water. None (In.) ❑ Sediment Deposits ❑ Other (explain in remarks) Depth to Free Water in Pit: >76 Depth to Saturated Soil: >16 (In.) (in.) ❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands ❑ Re marks: Ma Unit Name series and Phase : Woodburn silt loam Drainage Class: Moderately well-drained Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ 0-16 10YR 3/3 none none Silt loam H ric Soil Indicators: ❑ Histosol ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ Sulfdic Odor ❑ Redox Features (wfin 10°) ❑ Gieyed or Low-Chroma Colors ❑ Concretions (w/in 3°, >2mm) ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Remarks: 7 _ Assessmerit Report Iatura, Resource a tist chum" Tigard First B P TOGRAPHS o - B SATE PH APPENpiX 3 _j ~J AP -1 23,2004 Appendix B- Photo l: Vegetated Community A, looking northeast from near the southern property boundary Photo 2: Vegetated Community B to right and left of tributary channel, looking north • • Photo 3: Vegetated Community C in the foreground, Community B in the background, looking northwest and downslope from the church parking lot. Appendix B- Site Photographs • TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT FOR TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH Gaarde Street CITY OF TIGARD PREPARED BY Charbonneau Engineering LLC 9370 SW Greenburg Rd., Suite 411, Portland, OR 97223 (503) 293-1118 • FAX (503) 293-1119 APRIL 2004 9301 ~h 4ey 2Q7ka~i`604 EXPIRES: 12/31/05 PROJECT 04-14 • . • TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS CONSIDERATIONS ....................................................................1 SITE DESCRIPTION, STREETS, AND CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS .......................1 DRIVEWAY SPACING .....................................................................................................2 TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ..........................................................................3 VEHICULAR TRIP GENERATION .................................................................................3 CAPACITY ANALYSIS .....................................................................................................4 SIGHT DISTANCE ............................................................................................................6 LEFT TURN LANE WARRANTS .....................................................................................6 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS .....................................................................................6 ACCIDENT HISTORY ......................................................................................................6 PEDESTRIANS, BICYCLES, & BUSES ...........................................................................7 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS .....................................................................7 APPENDIX 8 • Vicinity Map Figure a • Site Plan Figure b • Lane Configurations and Traffic Control Figure c • Traffic Flow Diagrams Figure 1 2004 Existing Traffic (weekday AM & PM and Sunday peak hours) Figure 2 2009 Background Traffic Figure 3 Trip Distribution Figure 4 Trip Assignment Figure 5 2009 Total Traffic • Traffic count data • Left Turn Lane Warrant Worksheets • Peak Hour Signal Warrant • Accident History Summary (furnished by the Oregon Department of Transportation) • Traffix Capacity Analysis Worksheets • • INTRODUCTION This traffic study has been prepared to document and evaluate the traffic operation and safety conditions at the First Baptist Church in Tigard, Oregon in association with the planned expansion. The study area was defined as the surrounding neighborhood, including Gaarde Street and SW I I Oh Avenue. The church is surrounded by developed residential properties to the north and west, Gaarde Street to the south, and SW 110`h Avenue to the east. The site is located at 11075 SW Gaarde Street and is highlighted on the vicinity map (Figure "a") in the appendix. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS CONSIDERATIONS In the project scope established with City of Tigard staff, a number of important elements were identified and considered in this study. • Inventory and record pertinent information such as traffic control devices, circulation patterns, lane widths, pedestrian & bicycle facilities, school bus zones, parking conditions, and street characteristics. • Record data on typical weekdays during the AM and PM peak traffic hours and on a typical Sunday during the peak hour of the church. • Conduct traffic counts at Gaarde Street and SW 110' Avenue, the site driveway and Gaarde Street, and the site driveway and SW 110' Avenue. • Level of service (LOS) analysis of the study intersections to measure the approach delays for comparison to City of Tigard standards. • Verification of intersection sight distance at the church's existing and proposed driveway locations. • Review of traffic accident data furnished by Oregon Department of Transportation staff and determination of the intersection crash rates at the study intersections. O Consideration of traffic circulation. SITE DESCRIPTION, STREETS, AND CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS The proposed church expansion and remodel will include building additions totaling 34,700 square feet (sq. ft.). Development of the site will also include removal of the existing 2,100 A 1. TT „ ~ ~ ~i_ _ 1L _Cat..._ ..rL.. ~:....ro coo :11„n4r~4uo 4},n nrnnnewt'~ sq. r[. Boil nail, located on the none s1uC UL LIM t,1opV1Ly. i-1r5u1 v 111L1JL1 LLLVJ 16.1V r. vrv. site plan. The nearby roadways currently have two lanes. Gaarde Street, between SW 121` Avenue and Highway 99W, is currently being improved by the City of Tigard. Improvements include upgrading Gaarde Street a two-lane roadway to a three-lane roadway (a travel lane in each direction and a center left turn lane) and one bike lane. With these improvements Gaarde Street will be reclassified as an arterial. Charbonneau Tigard First Baptist Church April 14, 2004 4e Engineering LLC Traffic Analysis Report Gaarde Street, Tigard i 2 SW 110th Avenue currently has two lanes and sidewalks generally provided on both sides of the road. SW 110th Avenue is classified as a local street. Gaarde Street and SW 110th Avenue is a two-way stop-controlled tee-shaped intersection. Sidewalks are provided on the northwest and northeast corners. The existing and future lane configurations and traffic control are presented in Figure `c' in the report's appendix. Currently, the Gaarde Street at SW 110th Avenue intersection and the site driveways are unsignalized. DRIVEWAY SPACING City of Tigard access, egress, and circulation code (18.705.030 H.3.) identifies that the minimum driveway spacing along an arterial shall be 600 feet. Tigard First Baptist Church currently has two full-movement driveways. The first driveway provides access to SW 110th Avenue and is located approximately 305 feet north of Gaarde Street, measured near-edge to near-edge; the second driveway provides access to Gaarde Street and is located approximately 80 feet west of SW 110`h Avenue, measured near-edge to near-edge. Both driveways are proposed to remain with the planned expansion and remodel. The parking spaces adjacent to easterly Gaarde Street driveway are expected to be used primarily by weekday administrative staff as the spaces will not connected to the church's new parking lot. Two additional full-movement driveways are proposed with site redevelopment. The first proposed driveway would provide access to SW 110th Avenue and would be located approximately 515 feet north of Gaarde Street, directly across from the northerly approach of the Garden Park Place loop; the second driveway would provide access to Gaarde Street and would be located approximately 220 feet west of SW 11& Avenue. The church's Gaarde Street frontage is limited to approximately 325 feet, measured from the west edge of SW 110h Avenue and the west edge of the property. Based on the length of the Gaarde Street site frontage neither driveway to Gaarde Street will meet the City of Tigard's spacing standard, regardless of where they are placed. With full buildout of the church the eastbound left turn movement is expected to operate at "N' t 111\ 1_ L and dur;- the Sun A level of service during the weekday AM an" PM peA uoiirs aihu .,lllis filly -1 a., midday peak hour. This access will allow church traffic to circulate through the site and will lighten the queue lengths that would develop on SW 110th Avenue if the proposed Gaarde Street driveway was not provided. Development of this access will also minimize the impacts to the Gaarde Street and SW 110th Avenue intersection. Charbonneau Tigard First Baptist Church April 14, 2004 OD Engineering LLC Traffic Analysis Report Gaarde Street, Tigard 0 ` 3 TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS In order to evaluate traffic flow and delay in the area the Gaarde Street and SW 1101` Avenue intersection and the existing site driveways to Gaarde Street and SW 1101i Avenue were analyzed for level of service (LOS) conditions and safety. LOS analyses were completed in the weekday AM and PM peak hour and Sunday peak hour periods for the following scenarios: • 2004 Existing Traffic • 2009 Background Traffic • 2009 Total Traffic For analysis purposes the intersection capacity calculations and the traffic flow maps in the report's appendix illustrate one driveway to each of the SW 1101i Avenue and Gaarde Street roadways. Distribution of the site generated trips with two site driveways, rather than the four site driveways proposed with site buildout, will allow the worst-case scenario to be considered. In order to perform the LOS analysis at the critical intersections manual traffic counts were conducted during the weekday AM peak (7:00-9:00 AM), weekday PM peak (4:00-6:00 PM), and Sunday peak (9:30-11:30 AM) traffic hours. The weekday and Sunday counts were conducted in February 2004, before Gaarde Street was closed for construction. Figure 1 illustrates the existing volume data for the weekday peak and Sunday peak hours. City staff have identified that zero in-process projects are planned currently that may affect the study area intersections. Background growth is comprised of the existing traffic factored with a traffic growth rate established by the City. For this project City staff estimated a traffic growth rate of 1.5% per year over a five-year buildout scenario. Background traffic volumes, the sum of existing traffic and background growth, are illustrated in Figure 2 in the report's appendix. The 2009 total traffic is the summation of background traffic volumes and site generated traffic. The peak hour volumes are presented in Figure 5. VEHICULAR TRIP GENERATION Trip rates presented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition, were utilized to estimate the site's trip generation. Specifically, Church (ITE 560) trip rates were applied to estimate the trips generated by the proposed 43,915 square foot church during the weekday AM and PM peak and Sunday peak hours. Table 1 presents the trip generation estimate for the existing 11,315 square foot church. Table 2 presents the net increase in trip generation based on the increase of church square footage. Charbonneau Tigard First Baptist Church April 14, 2004 Engineering LLC Traffic Analysis Report Gaarde Street, Tigard • • 4 Table 1. Projected trip generation for the existing Tigard First Baptist Church. Weekday Sunday ITE Land Use Units AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour T A Peak Hour (sq.ft.) ADT D Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Church (#560) 11,315 Generation Rate' 9.11 0.72 54% 46% 0.66 52% 48% 36.63 11.76 50% 50% Site Trips 103 8 5 3 7 4 3 414 133 67 66 ' Source: Trip Generation, 7th Edition, ITE, 2003, average rates except Sunday Peak (generator). Table 2. Net Increase in trip generation based on church square footage increase. Weekday Sunday ITE Land Use Units Units AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ADT Peak Hour ( ADT Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Church (#560) 32,600 Generation Rate' 9.11 0.72 54% 46% 0.66 52% 48% 36.63 11.76 50% 50% Site Trips 297 23 13 10 22 12 10 1194, 383 192 191 Source: Trip Generation, 7th Edition, ITE, 2003, average rates except Sunday Peak (generator). The proposed expansion and remodel of Tigard First Baptist Church is expected to generate an additional 23 weekday AM peak, 22 weekday PM peak, and 383 Sunday peak hour trips. Trip distribution is based on existing traffic patterns at the site driveways, observations made at the site, and engineering judgment. Figure 3 illustrates the trip distribution for the weekday AM and PM peak and Sunday peak hours. Figure 4 illustrates the corresponding trip assignments. CAPACITY ANALYSIS Capacity analyses were performed to determine the levels of service for the weekday peak and. Sunday peak hours. Analysis of the 2009 background traffic and 2009 total traffic scenarios considers the future improvements to Gaarde Street. Traffix software (Version 7.5) was used to determine the level of service for each scenario considered. The program is based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual methodology. Table 3 summarizes the analysis results. Copies of the capacity analysis calculations are included in the appendix. Table 3 indicates that the study intersections will continue to operate at level of service "C" or better through the five-year buildout period. This intersection operation meets or exceeds City of Tigard's level of service standard for unsignalized intersections and, thus intersection improvements are not necessary. Charbonneau Tigard First Baptist Church April 14, 2004 02 Engineering LLC Traffic Analysis Report Gaarde Street, Tigard 0 Table 3. Summary of capacity analysis for study intersections. 5 Traffic Scenario Intersection Type of Peak Hour 2004 Existing 2009 Background 2009 Total Control Crit. ' LOS Delay Crit. LOS Delay crit. ' LOS Delay Mov t Mott Mov t Weekday AM SB B 14.7 SB B 12.1 SB B 12.3 T wo-way Site Driveway and Gaarde Street Stop- Weekday PM SB C 18 SB B 13.0 SB B 13.0 o oll d t c n r e Sunday SB B 12.5 SB B 10.9 SB B 12.6 Weekday AM SB C 18.5 SB B 13.7 SB 8 13.9 T Gaarde Street and wo-way SW 110th Avenue Stop- d t ll Weekday PM SB C 17.4 SB B 13.8 SB B 14.0 con ro e Sunday SB B 12.7 SB B 11.3 SB C 16.9 Weekday AM WB C 10.4 WB B 10.5 WB B 10.9 Site Driveway and Two-way Stop- Weekday PM WB A 9.1 WB A 9.1 WB A 9.1 SW 110th Avenue d t ll con ro e - Sunday WB A 9.3 WB A 9.3 WB B 14.3 Notes: 2000 Highway Capacity Manual methodology used in analysis. SB - Southbound, WB - Westbound, Crit. Mott - Critical movement or critical approach. Generally, LOS `A', `B', `C', and `D' are desirable service levels ranging from no vehicle delays to average or longer than average delays in the peak hours. Level `E' represents long delays indicating signalization warrants need to be reviewed and signals considered only if warrants are met. Level `F' indicates that intersection improvements, such as widening and signalization, may be required. According to the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), the following delay times are associated with the LOS at stop controlled (unsignalized) and signalized intersections. Level of Service criteria defined in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Level of Service Unsignalized Control Signalized Control _ (LOS) Stopped Delay (sec/veh) Stopped Delay (sec/veh) A 10 10 B >10and<_15 C > 15 and :5 25 D > 25 and :5 35 E >35and550 F > 50 > 10 and 20 >20and<_35 >35and555 >55and<_80 > 80 Charbonneau Tigard First Baptist Church April 14, 2004 02 Engineering LLC Traffic Analysis Report Gaarde Street, Tigard 0 • 6 SIGHT DISTANCE AASHTO identifies that sight distance provided at intersections allows drivers to perceive the presence of potentially conflicting vehicles and gives the motorist sufficient time to stop or adjust their speed and avoid colliding in the intersection. Sight distances from the existing and proposed driveway locations were reviewed in field. Table 4 identifies AASHTO's minimum sight distance recommendations and the sight distance availability. Table 4. Sight distance summary. Intersection Location Speed, Lanes Direction AASHTO Recommendation Distance Available Gaarde Street access 80 feet west of 25 mph, To West 295 feet >1000 feet (existing) SW 110th Avenue 3 lanes To East 240 feet 425 feet Gaarde Street access 220 feet west of 25 mph, To West 295 feet >850 feet (proposed) SW 110th Avenue 3 lanes To East 240 feet 475 feet SW 110th Avenue access 305 feet north of 25 mph, To North 240 feet 245 feet (existing) Gaarde Street 2 lanes To South 280 feet 320 feet SW 110th Avenue access 515 feet north of 25 mph, To North 240 feet 550 feet (proposed) Gaarde Street 2 lanes To South 280 feet 450 feet The existing and proposed driveway locations to Gaarde Street SW 110' Avenue have sight distances that exceed AASHTO's minimum recommendations. LEFT TURN LANE WARRANTS Left turn lane warrants were reviewed for the northbound approach of the site driveway to SW I I Oh Avenue. The analysis indicates that a left turn lane is not warranted. The left turn lane warrant nomographs are included in the report's appendix. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS The peak hour signal warrant presented in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) was reviewed at the Gaarde Street and SW 110'' Avenue intersection. Based on the low peak hour traffic volumes, signalization is not warranted at this intersection. ACCIDENT HISTORY Accident data for the Gaarde Street and SW 110'h Avenue intersection was obtained from Oregon Department of Transportation staff and was reviewed to help identify any traffic safety problems. Charbonneau Tigard First Baptist Church April 14, 2004 4e Engineering LLC Traffic Analysis Report Gaarde Street, Tigard • • 7 The accident rate presented in Table 5 below is based on the number of accidents per million entering vehicles (MEV). Typically, an intersection is not considered unsafe unless its accident rate exceeds the threshold of 1.0 accidents per MEV. Table 5. Accident rate results for study intersection. Accident Annual Accident Intersection History Number of Accidents Traffic rate per (Years) Accidents per year Entering M.E.V.• veh/yr Gaarde Street and SW 110th Avenue 5 1 0.2 3721796 0.054 wtm. - miwon entering vehicles. The Gaarde Street and SW 110th Avenue intersection accident rate does not exceed the 1.0 accidents per MEV threshold, and thus mitigation is not necessary. PEDESTRIANS, BICYCLES, & BUSES Sidewalks are provided along both sides of SW 110th Avenue and generally along the north side of Gaarde Street. With City of Tigard improvements a bicycle lane will be provided along Gaarde Street. Transit near the church is provided by Tri-Met. Route #12, Barbur; Route #94, Sherwood/Pacific Highway Express; and Route #95, Tigard/1-5 Express travel between downtown Portland and Sherwood on weekdays. Route #12 also operates on weekends. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The traffic study for the proposed expansion and remodel of Tigard First Baptist Church has been prepared to determine the potential impacts to the Gaarde Street and SW 110"' Avenue intersection and the site driveways. The church expansion is expected to add 23 weekday AM peak, 22 weekday PM peak, and 383 Sunday peak hour trips. The First Baptist Church is located at 11075 SW Gaarde Street in Tigard, Oregon. With church redevelopment two additional site driveways are proposed; the first to SW 1101' Avenue and the second to Gaarde Street. Both proposed driveway locations, as well as the existing driveways to Gaarde Street and SW 1101' Avenue, have sight distances that exceed AASHTO minimum sight distance recommendations. Left turn lane warrants and the MUTCD peak hour signal warrant were reviewed. Based on low peak hour volumes, neither left turn lanes or traffic signals are warranted or recommended. The capacity analysis verifies that the study intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service after the proposed expansion of Tigard First Baptist Church. Intersection improvements are not necessary. Charbonneau Tigard First Baptist Church April 14, 2004 Engineering LLC Traffic Analysis Report Gaarde Street, Tigard • • APPENDIX • Vicinity Map Figure a • Site Plan Figure b • Lane Configurations and Traffic Control Figure c • Traffic Flow Diagrams Figure 1 2004 Existing Traffic (weekday AM & PM and Sunday peak hours) Figure 2 2009 Background Traffic Figure 3 Trip Distribution Figure 4 Trip Assignment Figure 5 2009 Total Traffic • Traffic count data • Left Turn Lane Warrant Worksheets • Peak Hour Signal Wan-ant • Accident History Summary (furnished by the Oregon Department of Transportation) • Traffix Capacity Analysis Worksheets 8 Charbonneau Tigard First Baptist Church April 14, 2004 02 Engineering LLC Traffic Analysis Report Gaarde Street, Tigard LOT DATE: 3/10/04 FILE: 0414flow.dwg ST ~ JACK cT CT a ~ Q ~ JDHISDN ` ST s 0 ' ~ 1 Q R \ 2„~ DARK WAL UT 10 < a .1 f E CC 4 P ST N s ~ P a W SW N W ERROL ST SW ERROL 6 ?4 ST S/✓ ~ V ~o4 5~ ~ Qic ~ Np T , 0 J~ 7f iA .Z ST QS Jg in C T a f- ~a i2 ~ y S p ptNf~ ~ ~ ~l 11, SY N $ N m ^ F- a~~ , `~9(yU ~i3' ' C,~. 4, 6G~ U, 1 r",•I N 5T SW s• al N P C s T "Tf'T q y F S SW 10 CT TON SW ALBERTA Cv i W BAMBI LN «~N C. y , SW WATKINS pot cr a Sr ~ sr Q~ / / Q L FS y 0 SW Qp FONNER d s S ~ SW / ~w 1 SW SECA CT Q 3 ST MORGEN 4 L ~ C PL ME ~ $ , r z W C7 RY DEL Q ? s p N N ¢ 8r S~ yfr~ 4~~> > ` ~ > z J' ~ , SJ L! ~ ti eo .y SW MARION ST pi,Q y sw P l °E 4 PARK Z` ST FAN E SY _wIEt SW acv ` > LHOLLOW CT , o` p fYL TC.. SW 06/ c\ 0/1 5W `YQ COOK LN r ~a << `OA l e~ fN ?EC R CREEK aLN sV , SI / G E , F 1 a EN g y c + S a , J Q " < LN Z cp`W y J J C d SW f 10 CT 7s a LN to- t; FAIRIiAVE r SW FAIRHA EN ST 1R 7j '~1P r ~7~ `+V~ S _ ° ° G'~ L m W TALON Si ST SY k q,' I rtuaea YE \ /LV CQ o~v m ff m A to- FAIRY, - a A FAI RHAV r a e , N R ti`` C Q P Ex M •O m ROSE ~A ti r V ~4 JLN SW GARDEN VI E W MOUNT D S $ s` g ,o4 Ore' SW p S ~4 ~~p DR ANK DL1 sojiff SY +p AN77W VI , , UNT PSW HILIVIEY ST G H LLVIEW SW DEMO cot CT JOHN CT ! w R E CjT SW SAINT JANES W; ~ ES F LN N` 5 A DE ¢ = 3 l ip CT qq WILw~ F dLN c Sq a w < NO LER 7L 7R Hlll = Q a w 'ARE N o w SW ~ DRIPS ¢ JIWIEN CT G EUMSE s, SW ELROSE m CT sY SW i,. kv ~ ST I RP w IN1CNtLLY $ a .ter O Q a d MOUNTAIN . 1`y!STARVIEW9 OR SW MCFA C7 1 t g y Sw VIEY R VIEW LN _ BROOKL VIEW SV VI < w CDRYL 6 WI Lo u 9PA'°T L m S i y IT 2 uw u O RIVE GLEN MLRiDO SW INEZ ST L" SW INE2 ST a SW IRE ST a Svv B U L M U N TAI N C1 w CT N" C& S, M SW F PEMBROOK , ST i MIO a PEE ROOK> I ••_•._•.i SY [LEW1R _ • . SY Cx C O CD ai ~i ~na~ m 3 9L ri Y4 IIITIfEjN1EV DR Sw IT I , ' . at ~ Q SW NU(iDOCK 5T ~ m y ~ SW P) BR SS ~ UNTAIN tIT VIEWCREST vy~ 1 S6 I.gOCKY.110 CT IVA 4 10000 p l7 CT 2 SW BUGLE CT ! CT ~ • I SW CROWN a T h Q HEIDI CT StHE I DR a Ski TE f ! Rp i SW ASPEN ~ - ~O sv DEL MDI R 4AR LYN a CT SW LESLIE CT SW REI( L a RVl`~ O~ Sw lip O~ I DR SW LADY Ar- H PEPPERTREE SW 0ARMEL CT c TS SY 9` UMNVIEW C j HOOD ON SW LER a SA vES>iu+o ST 4~ + a rALty S o o KABLE 7O ST S g~ m pKESIOE~ G 3 FIELD sRAYV d ^y w t N 3Y PO ti o a rn a' ~ DR o 4° IN >L°F ~ a ~ °ii 2 k N q 2~ a SA d DR O RFCE BELLFER P{ I er \E~0 Y p PIPPEM LN ST Sw w 4 ( Yu.La CL UB ~ ` ,E s°Y+s°s a pR 8 igw AwDRD sT Y r, r w r^s Q Q\~ S w GREE~UEPT < S~MM~R f 6RCEN116 ~$WLN SUyAFQSy ~T S ~ , . o R \ W y4 • ' • C lW 'F y,~ s~ $W qi ~ (yIfIV p!~ Su HAMLET ` SVEET 1 P R Y ~ PHILI KING CITY P~ IAG s w PR • C c y/ d F ~ 5 a cES• OR Y, c ` ~ 0 d S VON a N 'o P £ 7 A _Oool t E[dIARO C7 .W y~9 ER Xv Pt, C f $ CEMURY Mg o " 02002 Thomas Bros. Mips l ST GDLi CWRSE sacvl sv 44P Pi CHARBONNEAU NOTES: NO SCALE VICINITY MAP FIGURE ENGINEERING LLc N TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH a PROJECT: 04.14 LOT DATE: FILE: 041 z w n L UZ SW 110TH AVE 1' = 80' • CHARBONNEAU a ENGINEERING LLc PROJECT: 04-14 NOTES: Site plan provided by Architect LA. SITE PLAN TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH FIGURE b z NO SCALE 3 Q f i1 'I SW GARDEN TIGARD FIRST PARK PLACE BAPTIST CHURCH EXISTING Cn~ SW GAARDE STREET At> A O W y SW GARDEN TIGARD FIRS _ T PARK PLACE BAPTIST CHURCH PROPOSED y I g S t &1 - - < - < - SW GAARDE STREET TWLTL~ TWLTL~ TWLTL~ CHARBONNEAU NOTES: TWLTL = LANE CONFIGURATIONS AND FIGURE 46 ENGINEERING LLc Two-Way Left Turn Lane. TRAFFIC CONTROL C ' PROJECT: 04-14 • SW GARDEN PARK PLACE UN O W Z NO SCALE TIGARD FIRST N Q BAPTIST CHURCH ENO 1 ~4 WEEKDAY ~$L ~~3 AM ~ PEAK NT HOUR 7 y F 231 II j y F 215 SW GAARDE STREET 4 ~f 27---A 477 418-- SW GARDEN PARK PLACE O W Q TIGARD FIRST y BAPTIST CHURCH co Q WEEKDAY _ X-e 0-1 PEAK ~ Q T HOUR 7 s 3 t t O LO I` 0 ) L F 526 N G7 N N JL ~ 30 <-541 SW GAARDE STREET ' 0~1 15-A u 392--> 383-> L SW GARDEN PARK PLACE L O W Q TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ~N ~-1 SUNDAY ~c 12 PEAK 9a it r HOUR 9- 2 N Clio) 26 ) L F 209 OIfN tq !C It- 21 F 221 SW GAARDE STREET 13-A 10-A Cl 290-* 291-> Iii CHARBONNEAU NOTES: 2004 EXISTING TRAFFIC FIGURE ° o ENGINEERING LLc TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 1 a PROJECT: 04-14 SW GARDEN PARK PLACE N ~ ~ M, Z NO SCALE TIGARD FIRST Q BAPTIST CHURCH ~NO K-4 WEEKDAY 1.-- 104 AM 2--l It r PEAK o-). Mon HOUR 2 E- 248 Y L l 55 231 SW GAARDE STREET 4-~ 29--% 513-> 449-> SW GARDEN PARK PLACE O W TIGARD FIRST y BAPTIST CHURCH + WEEKDAY o ~ ~y~ FO ins PM PEAK nT HOUR o I ,+o oLn 0 C4 in t[ F- 565 X. 32 E- 582 SW GAARDE STREET 0_:1 16~ 421-> 412-> SW GARDEN PARK PLACE W TIGARD FIRST En Q BAPTIST CHURCH SUNDAY is 103 PEAK 9 r HOUR > 2 I oI a F 225 !C E- 238 SW GAARDE STREET 13~ 11-A i 312- 313-> CHARBONNEAU NOTES: 2009 Background 2009 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC FIGURE ' ENGINEERING LLC Traffic = 2004 Existing Traffic + growth (1.6%lyrfor5yrs). TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 2 J non Mf-r. AA-1A SW GARDEN PARK PLACE N O W NO SCALE TIGARD FIRST N Q BAPTIST CHURCH Lo WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR o o in a. o t _ Nin 1--5% J <-5% F 5% SW GAARDE STREET 5%~ 30%~► 30%-> 55%-> SW GARDEN PARK PLACE o W 2 TIGARD FIRST Q BAPTIST CHURCH WEEKDAY PM 5%-1 ) PEAK 15X--4 " HOUR N co tn~ ~ Nko k- 5% Lo J_ ~ % F 5% SW GAARDE STREET <-5% 5%---A 30%---X 30%-> 55%-> SW GARDEN PARK PLACE O W Z TIGARD FIRST Q BAPTIST CHURCH SUNDAY ~ PEAK HOUR 70%--4 L M 00 55% F 30% IC 10% E 55% SW C.WDE STREET 5%-vI 25%-I 25%-> 20%-> CHARBONNEAU NOTES: TRIP DISTRIBUTION FIGURE ENGINEERING LLc TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 3 PROJECT: 04-94 Adr%hl • SW GARDEN PARK PLACE UN O W 2 NO SCALE TIGARD FIRST N Q BAPTIST CHURCH TRIPS: o WEEKDAY IN = 13 AM OUT = 10 1 PEAK TOTAL = 23 2--N HOUR N-- 7 E- 1 I[ y E- 1 SW GAARDE STREET 4-1 4-> 5-- SIN GARDEN PARK PLACE o W TIGARD FIRST y BAPTIST CHURCH . WEEKDAY TRIPS: PM IN = 12 OUT = 10 1-~f PEAK TOTAL = 22 2-74 0 HOUR Cli LO L <-i 5Q It- 6 1 SW GAARDE STREET 1.'( 4-A 4-> 5-> SIN GARDEN PARK PLACE ~ W z TIGARD FIRST Q BAPTIST CHURCH TRIPS: SUNDAY IN = 192 PEAK OUT = 191 10-a " HOUR -I TOTAL = 383 133 N m coo k- 1 05 j k-- 19 <-57 F 1o5 SW GAARDE STREET 10-A 48-A 38-> CHARBONNEAU NOTES: Based on net TRIP ASSIGNMENT FIGURE ENGINEERING LLc Increase of 32.600 S.F. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 4 PROJECT: 04-14 • SW GARDEN PARK PLACE N o w NO SCALE TIGARD FIRST N Q BAPTIST CHURCH NNO 1--- 4 WEEKDAY ~~4 AM o- )tr PEAK 9-4 ttoR HOUR Coto J L F 249 F 232 SW GAARDE STREET 5-0 33 --Jf 517-- 454-> SW GARDEN PARK PLACE E 0 W 2 W TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 0;: w 0 WEEKDAY s PM PEAK s> -C-4- HOUR o 1 LO wd J K-38 F 566 583 SW GAARDE STREET 1 -if 20 ---A j 425 417-> SW GARDEN PARK PLACE o_ to z TIGARD FIRST y Q BAPTIST CHURCH ~mN F o SUNDAY y I c-13 PEAK 12-> W HOUR 162--4 C* rII It- 131 ~ r`2 I k- 4 4 t Y E•- 282 3 3 SW GAARDE STREET 23-A 59~f 360 351- CHARBONNEAU NOTES: 2009 Total Traffic = 2009 TOTAL TRAFFIC FIGURE ENGINEERING LLC 2009 Background Traffic+Trip Assignment. TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 5 PROJECT: 04-14 INTERSECTION TURN MOVONT SUMMARY REPORT • File: DEDVJG T= 2.1 % 445 14 0 P= 0.34 6 31 Peak Hour 07:20-08:20 Total Entry Volume 759 LOCATION: SW GAARDE ST AT CHURCH ACCESS TIGARD, OR X245 `4 233 F 4 'C2 Date: 02/24/04 Day: TUE T=2.9% T=7°h Time: 07:00 - 09:00 477 E-231 Report Prepared for.' P= 0.87 P= 0.91 CHARBONNEAU ENGINEERING 0 481 T 0 0 0 y 1-4 508 0 T=% Trucks By Approach 0 P = PHF By Approach T Surveyed By., TRAFFIC SMITHY, INC 1225 NW Murray Blvd Suite 111 Portland, OR 97229 Phone: 503-641-6333 Fax: 503-643-8866 T=0% P=0 Report Reviewed by.- 1G EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND WESTBOUND TIME PERIOD --T E.-1 L) ~-1 T r, t- ALL 07:00-07:05 0 27 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 36 07:05-07:10 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 45 07:10-07:15 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 52 07:15-07:20 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 43 07:20-07:25 0 45 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 C _ -61 07:25-07:30 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 73 07:35-07:40 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 1 53 07:40-07:45 0 42 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 1 72 { rJ 07:45-07:50 0 43 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 11 0 59 07:50-07:55 0 30 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 22 0- 58 07:55-08:00 0 60 0 2 0 10 0 0 0 0 17 0 89 2 1 08.00-08.05 0 28 0 7 0 9 0 0 0 0 24 0 8 08:05-08:10 0 31 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 16 0 51 08:10-08:15 0 37 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 57 1 6 68:15-08:20 0 9 0 0 0- 1 0 0 0 0 23 0 53 08:20-08:25 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 08:25-08:30 0 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 63 - 4 08:35-08:40 0 31 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 45 08:40-08:45 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 35 08:50-08:55 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1 47 08:55-09:00 0 30 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 46 PH F q- ~ 2 I S TOTALS 0 857 5 16 0 32 0 0 0 0 398 3 1311 PHF 0 0.87 0.5 0.35 0 034 0 0 0 0 0.92 0.25 0.88 % Trucks 0 2.9 0 0 0 3.1 0 0 0 0 7 0 4.1 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 INTERSECTION TURN MOV T SUMMARY REPORT File: LIDH.mod T= 2.9 % 40 9 0 P= 0.67 78 31 Peak Hour 07:00-08:00 Total Entry Volume 751 LOCATION: SW 110TH AVE AT SW GAARDE ST TIGARD, OR Giza 27 ki ~ -51 t-51 F-iee Date: 02/24/04 Day:TUE Time: 07:00 - 09:00 T= 3.5 % T= 6.1 % 418 E-215 Report Prepared for.* 74 P= 0 P= 0.66 CHARBONNEAU ENGINEERING . 0 445 30 0 0 0 0 0 449 T=% Trucks By Approach P =PHF By Approach Surveyed By.• TRAFFIC SMITHY, INC 1225 NW Murray Blvd Suite 111 Portland, OR 97229 Phone: 503-641-6333 Fax: 503-643-8866 T=0% P=0 Report Reviewed by. 1G EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND WESTBOUND TIME PERIOD --T (-j L-) F1 T F C- T- ALL 07:00-07:05 0 40 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 11 6 63 07:05-07:10 0 32 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 23 13 74 07:10-07:15 0 65 8 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 19 19 118 07:15-07:20 0 35 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 23 4 68 07:20-07:25 0 40 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 14 4 61 07:25-07:30 0 29 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 17 1 52 07:30-07:35 0 31 3 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 25 0 65 07:35-07:40 0 19 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 22 1 48 07:40-07:45 0 49 3 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 14 1 72 07:45-07:50 0 29 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 14 0 45 07:50-07:55 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 48 I% 0 J 07:55-08:00 0 15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 19 2 37 08:00-08:05 0 29 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 11 4 49 08:05-08:10 0 39 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 15 3 59 08:10-08:15 0 27 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 11 2 44 08:15-08:20 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 08:20-08:25 0 19 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 18 3 43 08:25-08:30 0 32 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 22 0 58 08:35-08:40 0 20 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 23 2 51 08:40-08:45 0 21 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11 0 33 08:50-08:55 0 18 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 24 2 46 08:55-09:00 0 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1 31 FAA F = S = n,~i C-~ 4•Zs t i0>_'n TOTALS 0 704 36 13 0 57 0 0 0 0 416 77 1303 PHF 0 0.75 0.48 0.45 0 0.65 0 0 0 0 0.83 0.34 0.72 % Trucks 0 3.4 5.6 0 0 3.5 0 0 0 0 7.2 0 4.5 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrians 1 3 3 8 INTERSECTION TURN MOMENT SUMMARY REPORT File: LTOOJG T= 7 % 26 1 5 P= 0.72 32 T 0 Peak Hour 07:30-08:30 Total Entry Volume 133 LOCATION: SW 110TH AVE AT CHURCH ACCESS/GARDEN PARK PL TIGARD, OR L X53 ) X17 2 T-4 Date: 02/24/04 Day: TUE T= 0 % T= 0 % Time: 07:00 - 09:00 Report Prepared for' P= 0.45 P= 0.61 CHARBONNEAU ENGINEERING 7 9 El 52 T 26 .1-13 F) 3 Surveyed By.. TRAFFIC SMITHY, INC 1225 NW Murray Blvd Suite 111 45 81 T=% Trucks By Approach P =PHF By Approach Portland, OR 97229 Phone: 503-641-6.333 Fax: 503-643-8866 T= 1 9 % P= 0 42 . . L Report Reviewed by. JG EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND WESTBOUND TIME PERIOD q - -T FJ L) El Al f 'r- ALL 07:00-07:05 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 3 0 0 8 07:05-07:10 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 4 07:10-07:15 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 07:15-07:20 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 2 2 0 0 8 07:20-07:25 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 07:25-07:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4 07:30-07:35 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 0 2 9 07:35-07:40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 Z Z 07:40-07:45 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 1 0 2 0 0 10 07:45-07:50 1 0 0 0 3 0 6 2 0 1 0 1 14 07:50-07:55 1 0 0 0 1 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 17 07:55-08:00 1 0 0 0 1 0 21 4 0 1 0 0 28 08:00-08:05 1 0 2 1 1 0 2 1 2 1 0 0 11 08:05-08:10 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 7 Z 08:10-08:15 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 1 8 08:15-08:20 0 4 0 0 0 1 08:20-08:25 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 9 08:25-08:30 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 7 l 08:35-0B:40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:40-08:45 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 5 0 2 0 1 11 08:50-08:55 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 0 4 0 0 10 08:55-09:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 5 PHF - i--~ = 0 6+ 4-sq TOTALS 7 0 2 2 38 3 55 42 8 31 0 5 193 PHF 0.58 0 0.25 0.25 0.69 0 0.31 0.59 0.25 0.65 0 0.5 0.56 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 7.9 0 0 2.4 12.5 0 0 0 2.6 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Pedestrians 1 0 1 0 INTERSECTION TURN MOVONT SUMMARY REPORT • File: DEDWJG T= 0 % P= 0.63 Peak Hour 16:55-17:55 5 0 LOCATION: SW GAARDE ST AT CHURCH ACCESS Total Entry Volume TIGARD OR 0 0 5 923 , J "26 F "26 0 ILO Date: 02/24/04 Day: TUE Time: 16:00 -18:00 T= 2.2 % T= 0.5 % 392 E-526 Report Prepared for. P= 0.89 P= 0.83 CHARBONNEAU ENGINEERING 0 Surveyed By.• 392 Fl T 397 TRAFFIC SMITHY, INC 0 0 0 T=% Trucks By Approach 1225 NW Murray Blvd Suite 111 Portland, OR 97229 o o F h Phone: 503-641-6333 Fax: 503-643-8866 By Approac P =PH T=0% P=0 Report Reviewed by.• JG EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND WESTBOUND TIME PERIOD --I -T c--I I Li El T f t- ALL 16:00-16:05 0 32 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 26 0 60 16:05-16:10 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 47 16:10-16:15 0 20 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 27 0 48 16:15-16:20 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 55 16:20-16:25 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 46 16:25-16:30 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 62 16:30-16:35 0 32 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 63 16:35-16:40 0 26 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 54 16:40-16:45 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 63 16:45-16:50 0 -n -o 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 70 16:50-16:55 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 0 71 16:55-17:00 0 30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 49 --~1~ 17:00-17:05 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 60 G 0. 17:05-17:10 0 29 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 33 0 63 17:10-17:15 0 34 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 38 0 73 17:15-17:20 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 S4 a 8 + 17:20-17:25 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 1L_ 85 17:25-17:30 0 27 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 59 0 87 24-0 17:35-17:40 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 -_Z2--._ 17:40-17:45 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 _ 0 87 C Z 17:50-17:55 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 V 0 _ y4 17:55-18:00 0 30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 46 0 77 PH F = 9 Z ~ = o. 94 r 4.244 TOTALS 0 710 2 2 0 9 0 0 0 0 916 0 1639 PHF 0 0.89 0 0 0 0.63 0 0 0 0 0.83 0 0.89 % Trucks 0 2.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 1.3 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0° 0 0 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 INTERSECTION TURN MOV&NT SUMMARY REPORT • File: LIDI.mod T= 2.2 % 5o 22 0 P= 0.78 Peak Hour 16:35-17:35 45 Total Entry Volume 28 1019 LOCATION: SW 110TH AVE AT SW GAARDE ST TIGARD, OR <-563 E' X71 15 230 Date: 02/24/04 Day: TUE. T= 1.9 % T= 0.5 % Time: 16:00 -18:00 383 > <-541 Report Prepared for., P= 0.87 P= 0.84 CHARBONNEAU ENGINEERING 0 398 0 0 F) 411 0 T=% Trucks By Approach Surveyed By., TRAFFIC SMITHY, INC 1225 NW Murray Blvd Suite 111 Portland, OR 97229 o o m I P =PHF By Approach Phone: 503-641-6333 Fax: 503-643-8866 T=0% P=0 Report Reviewed by.• 1G EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND WESTTBOUND TIME PERIOD -1 -T 4 1 L~ E1 T ~ 2- ALL 16:00-16:05 0 29 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 6 67 16:05-16:10 0 21 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 32 1 57 16:10-16:15 0 25 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 48 2 77 16:15-16:20 0 30 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 40 2 77 16:20-16:25 0 35 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 43 4 91 16:25-16:30 0 25 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 31 0 62 16:30-16:35 0 31 1 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 35 0 73 16:35-16:40 0 25 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 37 2 67 L 16:40-16:45 0 32 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 4 96 16:45-16:50 0 38 3 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 47 4 96 16:50-16:55 0 37 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 58 2 100 16:55-17:00 0 34 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 41 5 88 17:00-17:0 31 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 35 3 75 17:05-17:10 0 39 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 79 Z ~ 17:10-17AS 0 33 1 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 50 3 93 o 17:15-17:20 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 45 2 17:20-17:25 0 36 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 45 1 84 _ 17:25-17:30 0 24 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 48 3 78 j 17:35-17:40 0 24 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 3 65r _ 17:40-17:45 0 26 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 31 0 62 17:50-17:55 0 26 2 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 40 1 75 17:55-18:00 0 30 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 33 1 69 X 2(~~j TOTALS 0 715 27 31 0 61 0 0 0 0 970 55 1859 PHF 0 0.88 0.63 0.69 0 0.58 0 0 0 0 0.85 0.68 0.87 % Trucks 0 2 0 0 0 3.3 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 1.1 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrians 1 3 0 16 INTERSECTION TURN MOV NT SUMMARY REPORT 0 • File: LTOP)G T= 3.7 % 39 0 38 P= 0.81 23 1 Peak Hour 16:50-17:50 Total Entry volume 97 LOCATION: SW 110TH AVE AT CHURCH ACCESSIGARDEN PARK PL TIGARD, OR E~ ~ E--3 ~ F8 D t-o Date: 02/24/04 Day: TUE T=0% 0 T=0% Time: 16:00 - 18:00 E_0 Report Prepared for.' P= 0.29 P= 0.4 CHARBONNEAU ENGINEERING 7 7 fI 3 23 53 G`8 F, 17 43 18 - T=% Trucks By Approach Surveyed BY.' TRAFFIC SMITHY, INC 1225 NW Murray Blvd Suite 111 Portland, OR 97229 Phone: 503-641-6333 Fax: 503-643-8866 P =PHF By Approach T= 0 % P 0 67 = . Report Reviewed by.• JG EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND WESTBOUND TIME PERIOD EJ L3 E1 T f F' ALL 16:00-16:05 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 6 16:05-16:10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 16:10-16:15 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 8 16:15-16:20 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 6 16:20-16:25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 16:25-16:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 8 16:30-16:35 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 7 16:35-16:40 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 4 16:40-16:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 4 16:45-16:50 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 6 16:50-16:55 2 0 0 0 4 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 ~2 - 16:55-17:00 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 L 1 :0D-17:05 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 17:05-17:10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 _ 6 17:10-17:15 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 8 Z L~ 17:15-17.,20 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 10 17:20-17:25 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 3 17:25-17:30 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 9 17:35-17:40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 17:40-17:45 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 10 Z 17:50-17:55 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 17:55-18:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 3 0 1 9 PHF -7_ : D, S(1S 4 Z1 (J a TOTALS 9 0 2 1 49 4 6 51 , 23 16 0 1 162 PHF 0.29 0 0 0 0.79 0.25 0.25 0.48 0.71 0.4 0 0 0.9 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 4.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.2 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrians 0 0 5 4 INTERSECTION TURN MOV&NT SUMMARY REPORT , File: DEDX)G T= 0 Rio P= 0.46 Peak Hour LOCATION: 50:10-11:10 11 39 Total Entry Volume SW GAARDE ST AT CHURCH ACCESS 2 0 9 549 TIGARD, OR E-211 X235 13 , T_26 Date: 02/29/04 Day: SUN Time: 09:30 -11:30 T= 0.7 % T= 0.2 Rio 290 > <-209 Report Prepared for. P= 0.79 P= 0.82 CHARBONNEAU ENGINEERING 0 Surveyed By., 303 E1 299 TRAFFIC SMITHY, INC 0 0 0 1225 NW Murray Blvd Suite 111 T=% Trucks By Approach Portland, OR 97229 0 0 Phone: 503-641-6333 Fax: 503-643-8866 P =PHF By Approach T=0% P=0 Report Reviewed by.• JG EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND WESTBOUND TIME PERIOD -1 -T f1 Lj E1 T f c' ALL 09:30-09:35 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 32 09:35-09:40 0 24 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 2 35 09:40-09:45 0 18 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 3 35 09:45-09:50 0 20 3 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 21 3 52 09:50-09:55 0 27 6 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 11 4 53 09:55-10:00 0 15 3 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 14 1 40 100 10:05 0 18 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 18 0 38 10:05-10:10 0 16 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 15 2 35 10:10-10:15 0 28 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 17 0 49 10:15-10:20 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 40 10:20-10:25 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 2 38 10:25-10:30 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 37 10:30-10:3 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 38 1 10:35-10:40 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 42.........._ 10:40-10:45 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 S 59 10:45-10:50 0 27 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 115 10:50-10:55 0 28 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 14 5 52...._...__ 10:55-11:00 0 21 3 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 17 4 50 1\ 11:05-11:10 0 20 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 4 46 11:10-11:15 0 17 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 25 1 - 44 ' 1 30 11:20-11:25 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 47 11:25-11:30 0 22 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 1 45 TOTALS 0 525 28 14 0 20 0 0 0 0 404 44 1035 PHF 0 0.81 0.3 0.5 0 0,38 0 0 0 0 0.86 0.5 0.88 % Trucks 0 0.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0.5 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrians 0 4 0 0 INTERSECTION TURN MOVONT SUMMARY REPORT • File: ERKFIG T= 0 % 51 P= 0.41 31 Peak Hour 10:10-11:10 LOCATION: SW 110TH AVE AT SW GAARDE ST 19 0 32 Total Entry Volume 594 TIGARD, OR j x-240 * y "42 10 t-21 Date: 02/29/04 Day: SUN T=0.5% T=0.4°ib Time: 09:30 -11:30 291 E -z21 Report Prepared for.* P= 0.84 P= 0.84 CHARBONNEAU ENGINEERING 0 J Surveyed By.• 301 El F' 323 - TRAFFIC SMITHY, INC 0 0 T=% Trucks By Approach 1225 NW Murray Blvd Suite 111 Portland, OR 97229 0 0 P PHF B A h Phone: 503-641-6333 Fax: 503-643-8866 = y pproac T=0% P=0 Report Reviewed by. JG EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND WESTBOUND TIME PERIOD -1 -T F1 I L4 E1 T r-1 ,f-' t- ALL 09:30-09:35 0 19 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 13 0 36 09:35-09:40 0 23 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 10 1 38 09:40-09:45 0 18 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 14 1 36 09:45-09:50 0 24 0 3 0 8 0 0 0 0 21 1 57 09:50-09:55 0 29 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 13 2 50 09:55-10:00 0 17 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 15 2 39 10:00-10:05 0 19 0 3 0 4 -0 0 0 14 1 41 10:05-10:10 0 18 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 12 4 39 10:10-10:15 0 29 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 18 1 10:1 -10:20 0 21 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 0 ! + 10:20-10:25 0 22 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 16 0 10:25-10:30 0 21 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 17 0 43 10:30-10:35 0 20 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 14 1 39 1-211 10:35-10:40 0 24 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 22 0 10:40-10:45 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 1 10:45-10:50 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 2 49 S tU 10:50-10:55 0 25 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 18 6 52 10:55-11:00 0 25 3 4 0 6 0 0 0 0 19 4 _ 61 _ ~ -7 11:05-11:10 0 20 0 3 0 7 0 0 0 0 26 2 58 11:10-11:15 0 17 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 23 2 44 11:20-11:25 0 25 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 19 0 48 11:25-11:30 0 21 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 21 0 47 P+-I F- S, 9 4 - 1 -7 3 TOTALS 0 536 14 38 0 68 0 0 0 0 413 35 1104 PHF 0 0.84 0.42 0.4 0 0.42 0 0 0 0 0.88 0.4 0.86 % Trucks 0 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0.5 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrians 0 0 0 6 INTERSECTION TURN MOV T SUMMARY REPORT File: LTOQJG T= 0% P= 0.83 Peak Hour LOCATION: 09:30-10:30 1 20 16 T SW 110TH AVE AT CHURCH ACCESS/GARDEN PARK PL Total Entry Volume TIGARD, OR 1 17 2 90 ~a 21 "3 9 Date: 02129/04 Day: SUN T= 0 % T=0% Time: 09:30 -11:30 2 <_0 Report Prepared for., P= 0.43 P= 0.54 CHARBONNEAU ENGINEERING 29 IF 12 Sumeyed 8Y.' 40 F' a TRAFFIC SMITHY, INC 7 6 4 1225 NW Murray Blvd Suite 111 T=% Trucks By Approach Portland, OR 97229 58 17 Phone: 503-641-6333 Fax: 503-643-8866 P =PHF By Approach T= 0 % P= 0.53 Report Reviewed by.• JG EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND WESTBOUND TIME PERIOD --j -T (-j I Li 1i T f Z- -L ALL 09:30-09:35 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 5 09:35-09:40 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 9 ~j 09:40-09:45 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 09:45-09:50 09:50-09:55 8 5 0 2 4 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 16 13 09:55-10:00 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 10:00-10:5 5 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 12 10:05-10:10 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 ? 2j 10:10-10:15 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 6 10:15-10:20 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 5 10:20-10:25 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 I G}- 10:25-10:30 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 7 10:30-10:35 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 4 10:35-10:40 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 10:40-10:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 1:4-0:0 1 1 6 0 1 0 0 10:50-10:55 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 12 10:55-11:00 6 1 0 0 2 1 4 2 1 2 0 0 19 11:05-11:10 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 8 11:10-11:15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 11:15-11:20 11:20-11:25 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 11:25-11:30 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 PH F = = 0 64-3 TOTALS 55 3 9 6 32 4 16 18 8 18 0 4 173 PHF 0.45 0.25 0.38 0.25 0.71 0.25 0.35 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 0.25 0.64 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrians 14 0 0 9 E It V. .0-C.6 mw.. tr..1 Figure 5. Warrant for left-turn storage lanes on two-lone highways. G100.. U.signaliud Intuf4Clions L- % L.11 Tums in. V. 5.5101090 1sn91h R.guil.d r • 40 mph L 140! Storage requirements for critical left-turn movements at unsignalized intersections on 24ane roads. Intersection Mov't Analysis Period Speed V (mph) Opposing Volume Vo (vph) Advancing Volume VA (vph) Left Turns in Advancing Volume (vph) % Left Tums in Advancing Volume L Storage Req'd (ft) 5W 116' at ward SE SB LT `69 Total M Peak r 2S O 4-5 3 4- 15 % x No r09 To r 25 0 96 31 55 j W No 'oq T I Sund 25 0 1 -i 110 58i No SL&CeSS at _&N I tt, N LT '09 T( M Peak H r 25 29 9 4- 6 3 67 % No PM P k r 25 4-Z 5(b 13 Z_:3 ;e No '09 To P r 25 33 S 4- 7 BSi " No . source: rugnway Kesearen rtecora #[i 1, marml1etinK, M. U. ' rzl-C A,00y-14 118CLYA T-W rKt (~.dl - Anal -A"hAVAA1,f fP11 N_ 4 LPA• V.. U.M.N. - Io.l Figure 7. Warrant for left-turn storage lanes on two-lane highways. December 2000 • 'Includes 6/14/01 Errata • Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour 600 T > 500 U Q 400 w w0 D: a 300 O: Q Z ? 200 ~O > 100 2 S Page 4C-9 2 OR MORE LANES 8 2 OR MORE LANES 2 OR MORE LANES 81 LANE 1 LANE 8 1 LANE A X •150 '100 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 MAJOR STREET -TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with one lane. PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT DATA i ri A l i P d Major Street Minor Street High Volume Approach Signal Intersect on na ys s e o Volume (vph) Lanes Volume (vph) Lanes Warranted? SW I V Total r4 1a( Z 4-5 1 No v~L Stt~e M r Sw 1100" W ue fib Z=q Td Tra i c 105B Z_ S I No SW (a 'WeeA PM Peak Ho Ur SW ttOt~\ kVCYM 1 Trq i -15 Z 143 1 No W ba&& Wed S P r gyfA *,4- pq,lq "T►9arf~11RY* ~ct~~~ ' r~.4~NrGh 03124/2004 XfRBAN NON -SYS TE M ACCIDENT LISTING PAGE 3 GAARD ST FROM SW 121ST TO PACIFIC HWY & ENDS VrIGARD) 1996-2002 WASHINGTON COUNTY CITT OF TIGARD SYSTm/ INTER OR DISTANCE ROAD- (NEUTAN) TYPE RES- SERIAL DATE/ C17Y STREET FROM CHAR/ TYPE/TURN WEATH/ ACC- PARTI- VER LIC/ NU./ DAY- FIRST/ INTERSECT DIREC LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ CIPNT/ OWNER/ AGE- MOVE/ 'ERROR/ EVL•'NT/ INVEST TIME SECOND (FEET) -LOC (LAMS) LIGHT CIAASS SEVATY TYPE SEX PR-TO ACTION CAUSE 03337 04/26/02 STREET WNBER 09010-, UR-COL STRGBT (UNDIV) RALN I BACK. 01 MVOP PRI ORL-Y RACK IMP BACK NONE FRI 03P STREET NUMBER 1901CrAW 30 NH 6 (2 ) NET DAY PDO PDO PASS 41 M SE IM HONE 07H.i? p 02 UN04 01 M PSNGR 03 NVOP PRI OR1-Y E70P NONE PDO PASS 48 F NW 3B STOPPED 09341 21/06/02 STRBR'P NtmEw 0901 LOCAL STRGHT 4MMIV) CLR E REAR 01 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STRGHT REAR-END NONE WED 03P STREET NUMBER 1901Q4W 90 NW 8 (2 ) DRY DAY PDO PDO PASS 34 F NW SE NONE OTH-IMP 02 MVOP PRT ORI-Y STOP NONE PDO PASS 83 F NW SE STOPPED 11600 12/31/01 STREET NUMBER 0901 G UR-COL I117ER 3-LEG CLR H TURN 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT NONE NOTREC MON 07P STREET NUMBER SIIG%10'.H CN 2 NONE DRY DLI7 INJ INJB PASS 10 M E W NONE 02 INJB 19 M PSNGR 03 MVOP PRI OR1-Y TURN-6 b IN TRP INJB PASS 33 M W N NONE NO-YIELD 07916 09/23/02 STVJW NUMBER 09016 UR-COL ALLEY 0-LEG CLR B TURN 01 NVOP PRN ORl-N TURN-L NO Ronff CITY LION 03P STREET HUMBER 51101i0nA 999 W 7 2 DRY DAY PDO PDO PASS 41 F S W ® NOT F7_n NO-YT 02 MVOP PRI OR1-Y 57RGHT trOWE J•T- PDO TRC7.'T 42 M E H WJNE (wYCE~S~r10N 12271 10/O8100 STREET NUMBER 09010 UR-COL INTER .3-Ii7G CLR E REAR 01 MVOP PRI ORl-Y S7RGHT REAR-END HONE SUP 04P STREET NUMBER 5112 I12T}1 E 6 NONR DRY DAY POD PDO PUSS 42 M E W NONE TOO T?kRT 02 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE POO PASS 15 F 6 W KAI7FORL 13261 12/07/00 STREET W45ER 0901 CT UR-COL ' lmgTR 3-LEG CLR B TURN 01 MVOF PRI OR1-Y TURN-L NO ROFHY , NONE TUU OBA Sm..BT rKneal 511:112761 Cod 4 NONF. r)RY nAY PDO PUG PASS 77 14 S W GO AIRED NO•YIGC,U 02 14vOP PRI OR.t-Y SIRGHT NONE PDO PASS 57. M K E I1011ID 056.9:, 07/02/03 STREET NUMBER 03D1 G Uk-CT4. INTER 3-LEG CLR B REAR nl liVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT REAR.-EMD CITY MW 07A S'CREET NUFlwt 5117 I14T14 G 6 N014- DRY BAY ITIJ PDO PASS 39 M R M NONR FOL-CIAS 02 WOP PRI ORl-Y STOP IMP SIG INJA PASS 20 F E W WAITFORL OTHER 08250 10/05/02 STREET t MSER 0901 G UR-COL INTER 3-LUG CLR E REAR OL MVOP PXl OP.1-Y STR.GAT REAR-END N(.M SAT 03P STREET NUMBER 5114 11411A E 0 NONE DRY DAY I.NJ 91)n PASS 20 F 11 W NONE FOL-CLOS ex am Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:17 Page 2-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2004 Existing Traffic, Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) +###ttat#i*t###*tt**#tt+#*#**#*##t###*#*+##*#t*#tt#t#+tt+*at*##*#*##*itttt#*#ttt Intersection #1 Gaarde Street at Site Access tt*tttt+##ttt#*t+*tttt*t*a#at#tttt#*##a*t#a###t*ttt+#####*#+t##t#*#at+##tt###a++ Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: 8 ttt#*+ttt+a#t4tt***t**#t###**####iii*t*tit#***t**##ti###**#ttt*#tt*t####t#*#a*+* Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I--------------- II II--------------- II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ------------I---------------If---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 31 0 14 4 477 0 0 231 2 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 31 0 14 4 477 0 0 231 2 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.86 0.88 0.88 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 35 0 16 5 540 0 0 262 2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 35 0 16 5 540 0 0 262 2 ------------1---------------II---------------II--------------- If I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx YYevv FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II--------------- II--------------- ll--------------- I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 812 xxxx 263 264 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 351 xxxx 781 1312 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 350 xxxx 761 1312 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx I II--------------- II--------------- II--------------- I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx Y :vY LOS by Move: * # t t # t A + * + # # Movement: LT - LTA - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 423 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxs Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 14.7 xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS : t t t # B t A + t # t # ApproachDal: xxxxxx 14.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproacbLOS: + B t # ex am Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:17 Page 3-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2004 Existing Traffic, Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCH Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) *##*##tt*##+t###t*t*##*t#ttt#t#tt##*###*tt#at###t#t*######*t#t*#t**#*#t*#tt*#t#* Intersection 62 Gaarde Street at SW 110th Avenue t#*##t+*#t######*ttt##t##+#*++#tt+#t##t*at#at###*t#tt##a+tt#*###tt####*t#ta####t Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: C #*#*#t**###*t#*att#t*t##*t#####a*#+######**##att#t+#t####*ita#t*tt*#tt######t#tt Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------1 Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------11---------------11---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 31 0 9 27 418 0 0 215 51 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 31 O 9 27 418 0 0 215 51 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.14 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 42 0 12 37 568 0 0 292 69 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 42 0 12 37 568 0 0 292 69 I II--------------- II--------------- il---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollcwUpTim:xxxxz xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I--------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- 11--------------_I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 966 xxxx 327 361 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 284 xxxx 719 1208 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 277 xxxx 719 1208 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx --------=---I---------------II---------------11---------------II---------------1 Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx YYx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A Movement: IT - LTA - RT LT - LTA - RT IT - LTA - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 322 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 18.5 xxxxx 8.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * C * A ApproacbDel: xxxxxx 18.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproacbLOS: * C 0 • Traffix 1.5.1115 (a) 2001 Dowling Assoc., Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ERG-PORTLAND I Traffix 7.5.1115 (a) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU EKG-PORTLAND ex am Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:17 Page 4-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2004 Existing Traffic, Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unaignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) +#t*ttrtt#r###++*ta+*+t+t+tttt#+t++#t*at#trtttt#++#+##+#*ta*+**}*#*+#*+#++*#}tt# Intersection #3 Site Access/Garden Park Place at SW 110th Avenue t*#ttt+t+t+rrttttt+rt#t*rtt+ttt+++t#tr+t#trt#t#tr+t++#rt+tt++*++###t+trtrrt+#++# Average Delay (see/veh): 10.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: B +t#trrrttt+rtt+*++++r+#ttttr+##+t+*#ttrrt+#t#ttt#*ttrttrtttrt#+tt+#++++#+t#ttttt Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------1 Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 if 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 ------------I---------------II---------------11---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 52 26 3 0 25 1 2 0 7 13 0 4 Growth Ad3: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Sae: 52 26 3 0 25 1 2 0 7 13 0 4 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHI? Adj: 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 PRY Vol---: 92 46 5 0 44 2 4 0 12 23 0 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 final Vol.: 92 46 5 0 44 2 4 0 12 23 0 7 1--------------- 11--------------- 11-_-------------il__-------------1 Critical gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.1 xxxx 6.2 7.1 xxxx 6.2 followUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 3.5 xxxx 3.3 1--------------- 11-_-_--_-_------il----_--_--_----II----_-_--_-----_1 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 46 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 282 xxxx 45 285 xxxx 49 Potent Cap.: 1575 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 674 xxxx 1030 672 xxxx 1026 Have Cap.: 1575 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 638 xxxx 1030 632 xxxx 1026 I_______________il--------------- 11--------------- 11_--_-_---__---_1 Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A # # + * # # * # + t + Movement: LT - LTA - RT IT - LTA - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTA - RT Shared Cap.:.xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 906 xxxxx xxxx 695 xzxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.0_xxxx xxxxx 10.4 xxxxx Shared LOS: # t # t # t + A + # B + ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.0 10.4 ApproachLOS: * * A B ex pm Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:19 Page 2-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2004 Existing Traffic, Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCd Unsignalixed Method (Base Volume Alternative) ti*#*i++}#4##i*#}ttr#*#*}##t#ttti#tt#tt##*+##t*#t#t###*#*tt+*+*t+#t+**++t}*t#t#* Intersection #1 Gaarde Street at Site Access ++#tr+*tttt+ttrt++t+##t#t#+##ar##tttt*r*#tt+#+rtt#ttttrt+ttt#+rt+ttt#*t#+##*#t+* Average Delay (aec/veh): 16.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: C rr #t r*t#}tt#t++##tit#ti##}t*##tt##*rttt+##t*t#t*t#*+it*t+t#}#t*#t4+ttirtt}rt#it# Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound Went Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II--------------- 11------------- r-II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 392 0 0 526 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Boo: 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 392 0 0 526 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 PHP Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.9S 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHP Volume: 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 414 0 0 556 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 414 0 0 556 0 I II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Op:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowVpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx rwxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------11---------------II--------------- Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 970 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 283 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Capp.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 283 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------11---------------1 Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 18.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: • # t C + * # * # # t } Movement: IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Sbrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: # * + t t t t r # + + + ApproachDel: xxxxxx 16.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: + C t 0 40 Traffix 1.5.1115 (a) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND Traffix 1.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND ex pm Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:19 Page 3-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2004 Existing Traffic, Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCH Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) t#t**tt*ti*ttt##a#t#ttt+###tt#t#######t*tt###*#*#t*t*t####+t+ti++###*+it*#tt++i# Intersection $2 Gaarde Street at SW 110th Avenue i*##ttttt#t#t####tat+####t##t*####tt####t###t*#tt*r*a*aa####t#*##+t##tt####**iai Average Delay (sea/veh): 17.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: C *tr++tt*tt#t#*a#tt#ttttt####t+*+##t*tt*tt**t####*tttttt*t######+*tttttt#*#ta*#++ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 28 0 22 15 383 0 0 541 30 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bae: 0 0 0 28 0 22 15 383 0 0 541 30 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Vol,,--: 0 0 0 29 0 23 15 395 0 0 558 31 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 29 0 23 15 395 0 0 558 31 I II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1000 xxxx 574 589 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 272 xxxx 522 996 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx x xxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 269 xxxx 522 996 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------11---------------II---------------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A Movement: LT - LTA - RT IT - LTA - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTA - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 342 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 17.4 xxxxx 8.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * + * * C + A ApproachDel: xxxxxx 17.4 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: t C t t ex pm Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:19 Page 4-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2004 Existing Traffic, Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ###**#*#aa+t##++###++tt###t#t#+##*a*t##t+i#**a###+attt*tt+#*++#+tit*######+*+#i4 Intersection #3 Site Access/Garden Park Place at SW 110th Avenue #*##*###i+#i#a+atit####+###+*t+i++i+aaati#a#tita#++t++*at#a##+tttt#+#####++#+i+t Average Delay (sec/veh): 9.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: A +#+ttt##*#+#tt++ti+ttti*tt#+ttt*t+#t##ttt##t#####tta#t#*########+#t+*#t##*#a#### Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 3 23 17 1 38 0 0 0 7 8 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 3 23 17 1 38 .0 0 0 7 8 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 3 26 19 1 42 0 0 0 8 9 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 3 26 19 1 42 0 0 0 8 9 0 0 I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.2 7.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 3.5 xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II--------------- 11-----___-------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 42 xxxx xxxxx 45 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 42 90 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1580 xxxx xxxxx 1577 xxxx xx x xxxx xxxx 1034 899 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1580 xxxx xxxxx 1577 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1034 891 xxxx xxxxx I---------------II--------------- 11---------------II--------------_I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 7.3 xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 8.5 9.1 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * A * * * * A A Movement: IT - LTA - RT LT - LTA - RT IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * * * * * * + * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.5 9.1 ApproachLOS: * * A A Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND I Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND ex sun Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:21 Page 2-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2004 Existing Traffic, Sunday Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCH Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) rtt}i#+atttr#ttt+*t**t*tt##t#ittt#*itt**+}*}t*tt}#t*#t+#t##rtt#rt*+#t+t*t+r#}#t# Intersection #1 Gaards Street at Site Access ttatrtta}rtt}t}t}}}}+}}}}t}}}ta}t}}r*}}#*t***t*tt#tti#t}rrtttttttrt#r#tttt+}tt#* Average Delay (sea/veh): 12.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: B ttttt+#rt*#*#t#t#r*+i+tt+##ti*}*t***}}*}**tr*t**tttt}irt*+r*tt##t}*t*t#+t+###r}t Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I--------------- II--------------- Il--------II---------------I Control: Stop sign stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanoa: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 lI 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 9 0 2 13 290 0 0 209 26 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bae: 0 0 0 9 0 2 13 290 0 0 209 26 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHP Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.68 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.86 0.88 0.68 0.88 0.88 0.88 PHP Volume: 0 0 0 10 0 2 15 330 0 0 238 30 Reduat Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 10 0 2 15 330 0 0 238 30 I II--------------- ll--------------- II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx zxxxx PollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx = = xxxx xxxxx I II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 611 xxxx 252 267 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 460 xxxx 791 1308 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx move Cap.: xxxx xxxx =xxxx 456 xxxx 791 1308 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx I II--------------- II---------------I Level of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * t t # t t A t t t t t Movement: IT - LTA - RT IT - LTA - RT IT - LTA - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 494 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 12.5 xxxxx 7.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: t i t # g t A # t # } t ApproachDel: 12.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: =v*= B ex sun Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:21 Page 3-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Cbarbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2004 Existing Traffic, Sunday Peak Hour Level of Service Computation Report 2000 HCH Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) *ii*ttrt#i*}t#rti#tttt+t#t*r*##**###ttit}+tt#t+tttti*+t+#*+ttr***#tttt#ttt+#r#t+ Intersection #2 Gaarde Street at SW 110th Avenue ####t*it*t##ttr*tit*tt#t#ttrt*tt#+t#+#+t#ttt+*t+tt*+tt#*}+tt+ttttt#+#tt+#ti#tt+} Average Delay (sea/veh): 12.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: B tt*+*it#t}t#}itt+t*t#tt#}##**t#t#**#*#*+#*#+#t*#*it*tttt}*#####+*tr#t#*###i}t#+* Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 32 0 19 10 291 0 0 221 21 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Sze: 0 0 0 32 0 19 10 291 0 0 221 21 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PUP Adj: 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.66 0.66 0.86 PUP Vol---: 0 0 0 37 0 22 12 339 0 0 258 24 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 37 0 22 12 339 0 0 258 24 I II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx PollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 632 xxxx 210 262 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 447 xxxx 774 1292 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 444 xxxx 774 1292 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II--------------- II ---------------I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A t t t + t Movement: LT - LTR - RT IT - LTA - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTA - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 528 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx __xx xxxxx 12.7 xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * # B * A # # # * # ApproachDel: 12.7 xxxxxx xxzxxx ApproachLOS: * B 0 0 Traffix 1.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND I Traffix 7.5.1115 (a) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARSONNEAU ENO-PORTLAND ex sun Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:21 .Page 4-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2004 Existing Traffic, Sunday Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ##titt##it*t*i*#ttit##it**##t*}+tt***itt}t+ti##ti#tt#tt+#tittt#t*#}*t**#tt###**+ Intersection $3 Site Access/Garden Park Place at SW 110th Avenue **it#t##+###titt+*+*tt#t###i*t#t*t#t#it*i#+}*t####it***+*}*##}*+*t}}t*}*+***}#*# Average Delay (aeo/veh): 9.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: A *t++*#+ti#}#*#i}##t#*+*ti##*ittt#}#t#iitit##+#i#*i#;i*##;t}}###it#+*#*i+*i*#t### Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I--------------- II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------II---------------11I Vol-- Module: Base Vol: 7 6 4 2 17 1 9 2 29 12 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 7 6 4 2 17 1 9 2 29 12 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PRY Adj: 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 PRY Volume: 11 9 6 3 26 2 14 3 45 19 0 2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 11 9 6 3 26 2 14 3 45 19 0 2 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------1 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 xxxx 6.2 To13owUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 xxxx 3.3 ---------------II---------------11---------------II--------------- Capacity Module: Caflict Vol: 28 xxxx xxxxx 16 xxxx xxxxx 68 71 27 92 xxxx 12 Potent Cap.: 1599 xxxx xxxxx 1615 xxxx xxxxx 929 824 1054 897 xxxx 1074 Move Cap.: 1599 xxxx xxxxx 1615 xxxx xxxxx 921 816 1054 851 xxxx 1074 ------------I---------------11---------------11---------------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 7.3 xxxx xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A # # A # } # t i # # Movement: IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1007 xxxxx xxxx 664 xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 8.8 xxxxx xxxxx 9.3 xxxxx Shared LOS: } * # t + * # A t # A + ApproachDel: xxxxxx 8.8 9.3 ApproachLOS: + * A A bg am Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:22 Page 2-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Background Traffic, Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) iii##}*##i#+i}*###i*itt##*#*ti**it#i+#ii####t*ti}t*#t#+#tit#tt*t#*#####t#i#*#t*# Intersection #1 Gaarde Street at Site Access t#iit*t}iitt##+t#}#t#}t**#i+***tti#tt#**#t+*itttii###t*tittttti#}*##*#i##t+##ti# Average Delay (sea/veh): 12.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: 8 ##+}*t}*#iii#******###***iii##t}#*t#*#ii#iiii#*###t#*#ti##iii}#}i}#ti##*i#i*#t#i Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------1 Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 31 0 14 4 513 0 0 248 2 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Sze: 0 0 0 31 0 14 4 513 0 0 248 2 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.68 0.88 0.68 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.68 0.88 0.88 0.88 PHF Vol,,--: 0 0 0 35 0 16 5 581 0 0 281 2 Reduat Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 35 0 16 5 S81 0 0 281 2 II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Critical gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx PollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I---------------II--------------_ii___-------_____II--------------_I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 872 xxxx 282 283 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 324 xxxx 762 1291 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Have Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 323 xxxx 762 1291 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: 0 0 xxxxx 494 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx I II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * + * # + A + t t + # Movement: IT - LTA - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTA - RT IT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 555 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 12.1 xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * # B * A * * # # + ApproacbDel: xxxxxx 12.1 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * 8 * i 0 • Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONKEAU EKG-PORTLAND I Traffix 7.5.1115 (a) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARSONNEAV ENO-PORTLAND bg am Thu Apr 6, 2004 15:13:22 Page 3-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Background Traffic, Weekday AM Peak Houn Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCK Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ######}#*##k**it#*tit}*+ti###tt#t*t##*##tt#t#ttt*ti*ititi*t+ti#Itt**#tt**###t#*# Intersection #2 Gaarde Street at SW 110th Avenue *i#t+##it#iii+#+#*#it#ttt*#t#it*t*i*t#t##tt#titt#####*#t##ttit tit+#t*##t*###t#** Average Delay (sec/veh): 13.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: B *+ittt*##*+t+*##iii*}t##i###it#*t#tt+tt#it##ti##ttt*+#*t+itti*}###t*#t #*#}###i*t Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------t---------------11---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 it 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------1 Volume module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 33 0 10 29 449 0 0 231 55 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 33 0 10 29 449 0 0 231 55 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.74 0.74 0.14 0.14 0.74 0.14 0.74 0.14 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.14 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 45 0 14 39 610 0 0 314 75 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 45 0 14 39 610 0 0 314 75 I II--------------- II--------------- II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxx= xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx x:` x xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II--------------- il--------------- II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1040 xxxx 351 389 xxxx xxxxx zzxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 251 xxxx 697 1161 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 251 xxxx 697 1181 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xulcxx Total Cap: 0 0 Y:YYY 428 0 YYYYY xxxx xxxx xxxxx x== xxxx xxxxx I II--------------- II--------------- II I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxz xxxxx xxxx Y Y 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * t t # * YYi A t # # # # Movement: IT - LTA - RT IT - LTR - UT IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xzxxx xxxx 470 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xzxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 13.7 Y Y 8.2 xxxx xxx= xxx= xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * B YY* A ApproacbDel: 13.7 YYYVYY xxxxxx ApproaabLOS: YY*Y B * # bg am Thu Apr 6, 2004 15:13:22 Page 4-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Background Traffic, Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) t#+#*t#ttii*ti**itt#*tit+t*#ttiti#tt*#*it*ttiiitiitt*#i*#i*ti#it###tt#ti#t*ii*tt Intersection g3 Site Access/Garden Park Place at SW 110th Avenue tit#+ttt+#i#tiititi++*#+*tt#t#t++titt#ttti#t#itttt+tt#t####it#+#i*#+t#+i###ititt Average Delay (sea/veh): 10.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: B ###it#*i###tt*ttt*+*ttti#t#t##i#t#*ti+ii+t#itit#+#t###t####*t**fit}*ttti##i}t##t Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -_-----__--_I_______________II----_--_____---il---------------II---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 it 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 It 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 52 28 3 0 27 1 2 0 7 14 0 4 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 52 28 3 0 27 1 2 0 7 14 0 4 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 PHF Volume: 92 50 5 0 46 2 4 0 12 25 0 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 92 50 5 0 48 2 4 0 12 25 0 7 -_--_-------I--------------- II---------------II-_-------------II---------------i Critical Gap Module: Critical ft: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.1 xxxx 6.2 7.1 xxxx 6.2 FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xx=m xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 3.5 xxxx 3.3 -_-------_-_I_______________II__-__--_---_-_-II-_--_-_-__--_--II--------_--_--_I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 50 xxxx xxx= xxxx xxxx xxxxx 289 xxxx 49 292 xxxx 52 Potent Cap.: 1570 xxxx xxx= xxxx xxxx xxxxx 667 xxxx 1026 665 xxxx 1021 Move Cap.: 1570 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 631 xxxx 1026 625 xxxx 1021 I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------------------I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * t t t # # * i t + # Movement: IT - LTR - RT LT - LTA - XT IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxux xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 901 zxxxx xxxx 684 xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.1 xxxxx xxxxx 10.5 xxxxx Shared LOS: + * + * * * * A * * B ApproachDel: xxxxzx xxxxxx 9.1 10.5 ApproachLOS. * * A B Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBOHNEAU ENG-PORTLAND Traffix 7.5.1115 (a) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND bg pm Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:24 Page 2-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonnoau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Background Traffic, Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) *****#*#a*****t*#t#+#*+t*at#t+t**tt*ttt*t+at+ttat+tt#**t*a#t*+tt***ttt*t+t##+#t* Intersection (I1 Gaarde Street at Site Access tt*tt*t*rta+**t*#t+*+t*tttttt+tt#t+t*t*ttttt+ttat+*t+t*ttatt**t+t**at+t##**#*+tt Average Delay (sec/veh): 13.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: B t+t*#ttt****###a*t*t###*t*##t#*#tit**###t#t#*+t*####tt#*#**i#*#t#*titt#**#**#**# Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound Went Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - A L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------I1---------------II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- III Vol,- Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 421 0 0 565 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bae: 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 421 0 0 565 0 User Ad5: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Vol,,--,. 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 445 0 0 597 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 445 0 0 597 0 I II--------------- II II ---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxzx xxxx xxxxz 6.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx x xxx FollowWTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------II---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1042 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 257 xxxx xxx xxxx xxxx xx x xxxx xxxx xxxxx move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 251 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx x Total Cap: 0 0 xxxxx 456 0 xxxxz xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------1I---------------11-------°-------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 13.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxzxx LOS by Move: * * * 8 * * * * * * * # Movement: LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - AT IT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * t t # t * t # ApproachDel: xxxxxx 13.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproaahLOS: * B f bg pm Thu Apr 6, 2004 15:13:24 Page 3-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Background Traffic, Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 RCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) t#*+*###t#t*#*+*#*+t+tt***t****t+at+a*++#t**++t##ttt#tt+tttt++#tt*+#*#*t**tt##*+ Intersection $2 Gaarde Street at SW 110th Avenue t*#++##+t*#*+t+#*a+#ttt*+t#t+at*a*#t++tt*##a+t#a+t++++aa+#t*at+t#a++a+**t+++t+++ Average Delay (sea/veh): 13.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: B ++t++#+ttt**t+**#t#+#t*+t+a*+*ta*#+#tttt*#t*tt#t#ttttttttat+t#tttt+tttt++++**t++ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I--------------- II--------------- II II I Control: Stop sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 it 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 30 0 24 16 412 0 0 562 32 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Sze: 0 0 0 30 0 24 16 412 0 0 582 32 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.91 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 31 0 25 17 425 0 0 601 33 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 31 0 25 11 425 0 0 601 33 ------------)---------------II---------------11---------------II---------------1 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxz xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx ° ° xxxzx xxxx xxxxx 8ollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------)---------------11---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 10,75 xxxx 617 634 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 245 xxxx 493 959 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 242 xxxx 493 959 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: 0 0 xxxxx 443 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II--------------- it--------------- I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A Movement: IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT LT - LTA - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 464 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xvxx 13.8 xxxxx 6.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * + * B * A t r + + + ApproachDel: xxxx 13.8 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * B 0 Traffix 7.5.1115 (a) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAV ENG-PORTLAND I Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND bg RM Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:24 Page 4-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Background Traffic, Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ##t###+*t##*+###*t#*##t#tt#t#+#tt*+t#t#**ttt#t++tt**#*#*t##*#t##*#*t*ti****#***# Intersection $3 Site Access/Garden Park Place at SW 110th Avenue i#tt##ti#}*#t###***t#t*##*##*}####*t#}#}*#t##t#i*#it#tYti#ttii#**#t#####*##*}t*# Average Delay (sea/vcb): 9.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: A ##*##}#t##+#tt*i#t*t*##*#ti****#*tt##t #tit**##***##}#it##Yt##}#**##t##YtY#***ttt Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I---------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0. It 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 3 25 18 1 41 0 0 0 7 9 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Boo: 3 25 18 1 41 0 0 0 7 9 0 0 User Adj: 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHI? Volume: 3 28 20 1 46 0 0 0 8 10 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 3 28 20 1 46 0 0 0 8 10 0 0 ------------I---------------II---------------11---------------II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxzxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.2 7.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxzx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 3.5 xxxx xxxxx ------°°--I---------------II---------------II--------------- Capacity Module: Cn£lict Vol: 46 xxxx xxxxx 48 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 46 96 xxxx xxxxx potent cap.: 1515 xxxx xxzxx 1572 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1030 691 xxxx x xxx Move Cap.: 1575 xxxx xxxxx 1 1572 xxxx xxxxx 1--------------- 1 xxxx xxxx 1---------- 1030 1 862 xxxx xxxxx 1---__--___---__1 I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 1.3 xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 8.5 9.1 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * A * * * * A A Movement: IT - LTR - RT LT - LTA - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx .Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxzxx xxxxx Xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * * * • • ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxx 8.5 9.1 ApproacbLOS: + # A A bg sun Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:26 Page 2-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Background Traffic, Sunday Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unaignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) #r#tit##+##+#t*t####+#tt#t+#*#t+#it+t####t###tt##*t#*t#t#t##+##*i######t##tt+++# Intersection #1 Gaarde Street at Site Access +###t#}*##i#t#t*##*##t###t#t##tt####t#+t*+#+*#t##ti##t###t##+Ytt#t+#*+it#tt##++# Average Delay (sea/veh): 10.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: B iii###tt**#t**4tt**##*####*###+#Y*+}###+*t###ttt##+#t+ttt###*tt###t#+f it*###t}#* Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -_-___-___--I--------------- 11---------------II-_-------------II---------------i Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 it 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 9 0 2 13 312 0 0 225 26 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 9 0 2 13 312 0 0 225 26 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.68 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.86 0.88 0.86 0.86 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 10 0 2 15 355 0 0 256 30 Reduat Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 10 0 2 15 355 0 0 256 30 I--------------- 11______-___-____II--__-__-_------II__:_--___-----_I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 ax" 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I--------------- 11-_-_-__-_______II--------------- 11-__-_--__-_---_1 Capacity Module: Cnfliat Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 655 xxxx 270 265 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 434 xxxx 773 1289 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 430 xxxx 173 1289 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxzx xxxxx Total Cap: 0 0 xxxxx 593 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------II---------------11---------------it---------------I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxzxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * # } t * A + # # Movement: IT - LTA - RT LT - LTA - RT IT - LTA - RT IT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 619 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Sbrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx x 10.9 xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: # # # t B # A + t # t + ApproaahDel: xxxxxx 10.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * B t t • • Traffix 1.5.1115 (a) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND I Traffix 7.5.1115 (a) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENO-PORTLAND bq sun Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:26 Page 3-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Background Traffic, Sunday Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) a*t#*#t*t**att#**#*#t**##***##t*ia*##t###**t#*tin*#*#at*t###t*+t*#tt*t**t#t+*#i* Intersection #2 Gaarde Street at SW 110th Avenue ##tt#at**tattt*+#t.tt*+t+#*a*a****+tt**t*a*ta#t*tr+tt*t##t*tt*t+t*#**#t#+ttttt*t* Average Delay (sea/vch): 11.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: B t*t*tt#t*at**ttt++tttt++**ttrat*tt*tt*#t**t*t*tt*####+###tttt*+**t***#+*t*#+*a*t Approach: North Sound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R Ti - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II--;------------11---------------11---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ------------I---------------)1---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 34 0 20 li 313 0 0 238 23 Growth Adj': 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Sae: 0 0 0 34 0 20 11 313 0 0 238 23 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.86 0.66 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 40 0 23 13 365 0 0 277 27 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 40 0 23 13 365 0 0 277 27 ------------I---------------11---------------II--------------- 11---------------I Critical gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx x==== 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xx= xxx== xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:°x-=x xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xx= 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxx== xxxxx xxxx I II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Module: . Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 681 xxxx 291 304 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 419 xxxx 753 1268 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxz Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx x=x== 416 xxxx 753 1266 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: 0 0 xxxxx 584 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xx= xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------II---------------11---------------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:===x= xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xx= xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * t t * t A a # * # Movement: IT - LTA - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 637 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 11:3 xxxxx 7.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: + * + # 8 t A a a t t a ApproachDel: xxxxxx 11.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproacbLOS: * 8 # bg sun Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:26 Page 4-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Background Traffic, Sunday Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) t#**tt+#+t+##+ta**t*#tttt****t*tt*ttt*t*+*****##*t+*#++***tt+++++++++t**+#++##a* Intersection Q3 Site Access/Garden Park Place at SW 110th Avenue *##*t##*+***t*#t*t**tt+*+t**##tt*tt*#***t*#t+tttatt#t+t#t*tttt*tt*tatt*ttt++*#*# Average Delay (sec/veh): 9.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: A +++t#t+*+++t***##+**tt*a+t**t*ttt*t**t**a*+a#+*ttttt*+t+a++#*++tt*t+*t*t++++++++ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------11---------------11---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I • Volume Module: Base Vol: 7 6 4 2 18 1 9 2 29 13 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Doe: 7 6 4 2 18 1 9 2 29 13 0 1 User Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 PHF Vol,,--: 11 9 6 3 28 2 14 3 45 20 0 2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 11 9 6 3 26 2 14 3 45 20 0 2 11 It I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 xxxx 6.2 FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx =_==x 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 xxxx 3.3 11 I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 30 xxxx 16 xxxx xxxxx 70 72 29 93 xxxx 12 Potent Cap.: 1597 xxxx xxxxx 1615 xxxx xxxxx 927 822 1052 995 xxxx 1074 Move Cap.: 1597 xxxx xxxxx 1615 xxxx xxxxx 919 815 1052 848 xxxx 1074 ------------I---------------II---------------11---------------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 1.3 xxxx xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A + * A Movement: IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTA - RT IT - LTA - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxz xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1005 xxxxx xxxx 861 xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 8.8 xxxxx xxxxx 9.3 xxxxx • Shared LOS: * * * * * * A + * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx 8.8 9.3 ApproacbIOS: A A Traffix 7.5.1115 (a) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENO-PORTLAND I Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND to am Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:28 Page 2-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Total Traffic, Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) #*t*itt#t+t#t*#*r*#*#t#+####+ii#+#t*+#tt##t#***#####t*##**++#**t+*+*#t*t*+t##+#i Intersection N1 Gaarde Street at Site Access t*t+t#tt*+t#t*+#*i#t*#i*#tii##*t##+i*#+#t##***t+it#*##+t+#ttt#*#*+ttt*#+*#t*##*t Average Delay (sea/veh): 12.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: B N #*t**#itt#t##t**##t*#*ttt###tit#it##*#**t*i**#i*###*tt#*###*i#*#+#*+*t#tt####+ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R t--------------- II--------------- II II---------------I Control: Stop sign stop sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 I--------------- II--------------- tl II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 36 0 16 5 S17 0 0 249 3 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Boo: 0 0 0 36 0 16 5 517 0 0 249 3 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.68 0.88 0.68 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.86 0.68 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 41 0 18 6 S06 0 0 282 3 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 41 0 18 6 566 0 0 282 3 I II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxx== xxxx xxxxx PollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I It--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Module: Caflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 881 xxxx 284 285 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 320 xxxx 760 1288 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx ]t7UC7GX Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 319 xxxx 760 1288 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: 0 0 xxxxx 490 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx Y==== xxxx xxxx xkxxx ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * # # # * * A t # * * # Movement: IT - LTR - RT LT - LTA - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 550 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx Xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 12.3 xxxxx 7.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxx Y Shared LOS: * * # t B # A * t + * # ApproachDol: xxxxxx 12.3 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * B * to am Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:28 Page 3-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Total Traffic, Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCH Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) +##t#*#*###+##t*tt+*tt##t##+t####*++*ttttit#t*#ti##+*##*#+++t+*+####*+*+++++#+t# Intersection #2 Gaarde Street at SW 110th Avenue +t#t#tt*#*####+ti*##i*##t*+#+#t##**++tit+###t**ttt+t#t#tt#*#*#*#+#t*#*##+####### Average Delay (sea/veh): 13.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: B +#+##*t*#*i*#+##+*##*#++*#*#+#+##tit#+#*+*#*#t++*##*ti##+#++#i+###i##*##+*#+#+*# Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------1---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 34 0 11 33 454 0 0 232 62 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 34 0 ,11 33 454 0 0 232 62 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 PHP Volume: 0 0 0 46 0 15 45 617 0 0 315 84 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 46 0 15 45 617 0 0 315 84 I II II--------------- II ---------------i Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx = = xxxxx xxxx xxxxx PolloMUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II--------------- II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1064 xxxx 357 399 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 249 xxxx 691 1170 xxxx x===Y xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 242 xxxx 691 1170 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: 0 0 xxxxx 419 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------(I---------------11---------------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.1 xxxx xxxxx Y==== xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * t + t # i A i t t + + Movement: IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 463 xxxxx .xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 13.9 xxxxx 8.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: + * + * B i A # # i + Approach el: 19.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: + B t + 0 • Traffix 7.5.1115 (o) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENO-PORTLAND I Traf£ix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENO-PORTLAND to am Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:28 Page 4-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Total Traffic, Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unaignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ***t+t**t*i+*#*t#**t#***tti#ti##*++#tt+#itt#t#tttt**#*##t***#*#****t****t####*i# Intersection #3 Site Access/Garden Park Place at SW 110th Avenue #*#t#+*t#t#i*t*##t**#####*t++#*+*t+*#*+#t####*}i+t+i#**#tt***#t#*#####**t*##t*#} Average Delay (sea/veh): 10.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: B ###***#tit#*+##*#**###*##tt#*###i*+*t####*#***t*##**#tt#**#*#*#**#*##t**##*#*### Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound Went Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II ---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 it 0 0 Vol,,-- Module: Base Vol: 63 28 3 0 27 2 3 0 9 14 0 4 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Boo: 63 28 3 0 27 2 3 0 9 14 0 4 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 PHF Volume: 112 50 5 0 48 4 5 0 16 25 0 7 Reduat Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 112 50 5 0 48 4 5 0 16 25 0 7 I--------=------ II II--------------- il---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.1 xxxx 6.2 7.1 xxxx 6.2 FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 3.5 xxxx 3.3 1--------------- 11--------------- 11_----------____II---------------1 Capacity Module: Cn£lict Vol: 51 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 329 xxxx 50 333 xxxx 52 Potent Cap.: 1568 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 628 xxxx 1024 624 xxxx 1021 Move Cap.: 1568 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx -Yxxx- 588 xxxx 1024 579 xxxx 1021 ------------I---------------I1---------------II---------------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx.xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A t * # * t # t t * * + Movement: IT - LTA - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 864 xxxxx xxxx 640 xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.3 xxxxx xxxxx 10.9 xxxxx Shared LOS: . * t # t + * * A t t B i ApproaahDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.3 10.9 ApproachLOS: * * A 8 to pm Thu Apr 6, 2004 15:13:29 Page 2-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Total Traffic, Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 RCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ##***++}*t##+#it#*#t+*#*t}}**}i#*t}*##*##}+##*##*it*tt#ttt#*###t##*###**t*t#+### Intersection #1 Gaarde Street at Site Access *#+*#++ttt*#*******#t***#i***#*#**###ttt#*+#**##it+}tit}tt+#}t*+}}}t*}*t+*+#}}#+ Average Delay (sea/veh): 13.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: B t##*#t*t**#t*#it*t*+t*t##**##*#*+*****#**#+*#*#}#*#t#*tt**t####*ti*##+#*}#**+t#+ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------1---------------II---------------11---------------II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 10 0 2 1 425 0 0 566 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Baez 0 0 0 10 0 2 1 425 0 0 566 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Vol,,--: 0 0 0 11 0 2 1 449 0 0 598 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 11 0 2 1 449 0 0 598 1 ------------I---------------II---------------If---------------11---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II--------------- II II---------------I Capacity Module: Caflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1050 xxxx 599 599 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 254 xxxx 505 988 xxxx Xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 254 xxxx 505 968 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: 0 0 xxxxx 454 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx I II--------------- II II---------------I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: + * * * * * A + Movement: IT - LTR - RT LT - LTA - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 462 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx • Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 13.0 xxxxx 8.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * + # * B * A * * * * + ApproacbDel: xxxxxx 13.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproaahLOS: * 8 + Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND I Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHMBONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND to pm Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:29 Page 3-1 Tigard Pirat Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Total Traffic, Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Vol- Alternative) #ttt+t+tt+#*++++ttt*#t+ittt*tattt##+tt#+t#*#at#i*+tit#++#*#t++tt**tat#**#t++*att Intersection N2 Gaarde Street at SW 110th Avenue ##tttaiti+#t*t#tt##*#****t**t*#tt#it##ttt*t*itttt#ttt#ttt*tit++*ttt*i#tt*t#+###t Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.0 Worst Case Level of Service: B #++t*at##t#*ttaatt*tat*+*t*aaat+*#tti*ttt*aattat*+*tt#++t*att#tt+it*+#++**+*++*t Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------t---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------1 Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0, 1 0 I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- il---------------! Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 31 0 25 20 417 0 0 583 36 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bae: 0 0 0 31 0 25 20 417 0 0 583 38 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHP Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 32 0 26 21 430 0 0 602 39 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 32 0 26 21 430 0 0 602 39 ------------I---------------II---------------11---------------II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx PollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx YxvY: 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------11---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1093 xi= 621 641 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx =°=vY Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 239 xxxx 491 953 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 235 xxxx 491 953 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx r.Y Total Cap: 0 0 xxxxx 437 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------1---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: + + t + + t A + t t * # Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTA - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 459 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 14.0 xxxxx 8.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: + * + + B + A + + + + + ApproachDel: xxxxxx 14.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * B + + to pm Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:29 Page 4-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Total Traffic, Weekday PM Peak Hour Level of Service Computation Report 2000 HCid Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) tit*t*taaittttttat#*ttttt*ttttatttattttaatt*t**t+*#*t#**tt#*t#*t#tt*ta*tttitttti Intersection X13 Site Access/Garden Park Place at SW 110th Avenue +tt*t#t##tt*t#*+tt#*tt*t*t++tttttt#tttt**ttat*ti*t#tti*+i+i*+tttttt*ta*+#**tta** Average Delay (sea/veh): 9.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: A tit*t#+t+ta*t#+t#a#ti#*++att*ttttt#tttta+*t+#ittt*ttt#*#++aitt*ttti*t#tttttt#+ta Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 it 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 ------------I---------------11---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 13 25 18 1 14 0 1 0 9 9 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Eve: 13 2S 18 1 14 0 1 0 9 9 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PUP Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHP Volume: 14 28 20 1 16 0 1 0 10 10 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 14 28 20 1 16 0 1 0 10 10 0 0 ------------i---------------II--------------- 11------------- --II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 xxxx 6.2 7.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 3.5 xxxx xxxxx I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I Capacity module: Caflict Vol: 16 xxxx xxxxx 48 xxxx xxxxx 85 xxxx 16 90 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1615 xxxx xxxxx 1572 xxxx xxxxx 907 xxxx 1070 900 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1615 xxxx xxxxx 1572 xxxx xxxxx 900 xxxx 1010 885 xxxx xxxxx I---------------II---------------II--------------- 11--------------_I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 7.2 xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.1 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * A * * * * * A Movement: IT - LTA - RT IT - LTA - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTA - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1050 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 8.5 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * + + A AppzoachDel: YYYVYQ xxzxxx 8.S 9.1 ApproaahLOS: * * A A • • Traffix 7.5.1115 (a) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENO-PORTLAND I Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENO-PORTLAND to Run Thu Apr 6, 2004 15:13:31 Page 2-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Total Traffic, Sunday Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCH Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) iit*tt#t##tti#t#titi#ii##t#ittiiti###*itiiti#a#ti##itttti*tti*#tiatii+*tt#t*itt# Intersection #1 Gaarde Street at Site Access iii###t#tiat####it*i*ttt#i#ititttitt#t*#iiitatrt##t##t#it#t#tt#iittt*ttitt#+ti#* Average Delay (sea/veb): 12.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: B iii#iiii##t**#*i+it**ai+t#t#t#i*#ittttiti#t**#tti*t*#*tt#*#t*1tt*at+t***t*t#ttit Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------1---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ------------I---------------11---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 47 0 12 23 360 0 0 282 131 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 47 0 12 23 360 0 0 282 131 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 53 0 14 26 409 0 0 320 149 Reduat Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 53 . 0 14 26 409 0 0 320 149 I )I--------------- II--------------- II ° Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxk 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 1---------------II---------------II---------------il---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 856 xxxx 395 469 xxxx xxxx xxxx zxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 331 xxxx 659 1103 xxxx xxxxx xx= xxxx xxxxx move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 325 xxxx 659 1103 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: 0 0 xxxxx 514 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------1---------------11---------------II---------------II---------------I Level of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * # * # i # A t t i * t Movement: LT - LTR - RT IT - LTA - AT IT - LTA - RT IT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 536 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 12.6 xxxxx 8.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * t t t B t A # ApproacbDel: xxxxxx 12.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * B * # to sun Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:31 Page 3-1 Tigard First Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Total Traffic, Sunday Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) #*tii#t##*#t#*#tit**tt*itttattit*t*###**#*t*it###i#*#tttiii#tt*#tat*ttt***##tt## Intersection #2 Gaarde Street at SW 110th Avenue tatitittt+taii+ittiiittitt*+tttait#it#ittt*#ti+tttiiitit#ttt#+#ti+ttiii*+tittt#t Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: C a*+*i*tit+t##titttt#tt*ittt#iitttt#t*#t##i#ii+tiii#it+iiti+rit#iiatati#tit##+i#i Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------11---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include . Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 it 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ------------I---------------11---------------II---------------II---------------I • Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 110 0 77 59 351 0 0 343 42 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 110 0 77 59 351 0 0 343 42 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.86 0.86 0.66 0.86 0.86 0.86' 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 126 0 90 69 409 0 0 400 49 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 126 0 90 69 409 0 0 400 49 I---------------il-_-__----------II--------------- II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx zxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo13owUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx _ xxxx xxxxx I II--------------- II--------------- II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 971 xxxx 424 449 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 283 xxxx 634 1122 xxxx x==== xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 269 xxxx 634 1122 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: 0 0 xxxxx 460 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------I1---------------I Level of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A Movement: IT - LTR - RT IT - LTA - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTA - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxx 518 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 16.9 xxxxx 8.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * C * A * * * + ApproaahDel: xxxxxx 16.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * C Tzaffix 7.5.1115 (a) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENO-PORTLAND -Traffix 1.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENG-PORTLAND to sun Thu Apr 8, 2004 15:13:31 Page 4-1 Tigard first Baptist Church Charbonneau Engineering LLC, Project 04-14 2009 Total Traffic, Sunday Peak Hour Level of Service Computation Report 2000 HCH Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) +++++t++a+a+++aa++ta+++++++aaa++a++a+++a+++a+++a++a*+a+a++a+aa*a+++++++++++a++++ Intersection M3 Site Acoess/Garden Park Place at SW 110th Avenue +++a+ar+a+++*+++++a*++++a++a++a++++++a+a++++a++a++a++a++aa+++a++a++++a++t+++++++ Average Delay (aeo/veh): 14.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: B ++*++a+a+aa+a+t+++++++*++t++++++a++a++a+t+a++*+++a+aa+aa++++++++++++a++*+++++*++ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L- T- R L - T - R L- T - R L - T - R I II II II ---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 if 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 74 6 4 2 18 11 19 2 162 13 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Boo: 74 6 4 2 18 11 19 2 162 13 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHP Adj: 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 PHP Volume: 115 9 6 3 28 17 30 3 252 20 0 2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 final Vol.: 115 9 6 3 28 17 30 3 252 20 0 2 1---------------II--------------- 11--------------_II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 xxxx 6.2 followUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 xxxx 3.3 1---------------II__-------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 45 xxxx xxxxx 16 xxxx xxxxx 286 286 37 413 xxxx 12 Potent Cap.: 1576 xxxx xxxxx 1615 xxxx xxxxx 670 625 1042 553 xxxx 1074 Hove Cap.: 1576 xxxx xxxxx 1615 xxxz xxxxx 628 575 1042 392 xxxx 1074 ------------1---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 7.3 xxxx xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A + + A + a + + + + a a Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTA - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTA - RT Shared Capp.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 967 xxxxx xxxx 411 xxxxxx Sbrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 10.3 xxxxx xxxxx 14.3 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * + * * B * * B ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.3 14.3 ApproachLOS: * + B B • • Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CHARBONNEAU ENO-PORTLAND • ~nlimite~ . ARBORIST REPORT= Address of the Report: ::Tigard First:Baptist '.11075 SW: Garrde St. Tigard, OR Date of the Report::.` 22;.2004 -Repor(Submitted To; "Archifect: LA PH: 503-231=1122 :Attu`:.. Larry Abell 503-231-0317 `.805 SE Sherman St. Portland, OR :9721.4 I.reviewed the trees o.n the site on June 22, 2004.. The 10 trees that are to be: affected :by site development. as. shown on. the site,plan are all non-viable trees due .to structural defects. dead, Ving or:diseased...The'remaining trees on site, 33, are ;.:located to the:west of the area to be dev..eloped and.Will all be.retained Althoug.h;;.:...... some of'these may be :non=viable they will all be 'retatneTherefore 100% of the ` - viable trees on, site:wi[l`be retained and protected. Obviously the iandscapIng plan' will'..be-adding a sigr i,ficant number .of trees.. Some of the existing trees under 6"-•D .BH. could be used ;in .the new landscape .if -desired:... Tree protection fencing `will need to-be installed beyond the drip line of the trees to be retained. See:encloseci;tree~Orotection plan. It appears all of, the retai.ried...trees are in the enviro.nmenta:l zone so'::the.need for protection fencing should be minimal . depending on :city reconirriendations. Please call if I can "be of further' "assistance. Respectfully, Raymond Myer;;,General Manager . Tree Care & Landscapes Unlimited...-Inc. Certified Arborist by the Internati:onal,.: Society of Arboriculture, Lic: # PN-01'60. Oregon Landscape Contractors hic..# 11604 Oregon Dept. of Agricuiture", Commercial Pesticide Applicators License # 00187 Residential and Commercial Spraying • Fertilizing • Pruning • Landscape Installation • Landscape Maintenance • Consultation. MEMBER: National Arborist Association • International Society of Arboriculture • Oregon Association of Nurserymen Oregon Golf Course Superintendents' Association • Oregon Landscape Contractors Association State Licensed Tree Service 962635 • Landscape Contractor 95659 • Chemical Application 9000231 • Insured P.O. Box 1566 • Lake Oswego, OR 97035 • 503-635-3165 • Vancouver 360-737-2646 • FAX 503-635-1549 Visit our website at www.treecareiandscapes.com 6L- A-dil • Tree Protection ;Plan Uiilimitea . . (REVISED 3/27/03) Follow the below listed instructions in order to'provide the proper protection before, during and after construction... 1. Before Construction: a. Identify and number the trees, to.be protected, verify by mapping and/or tagging and note their size in'D.B.H. (Diameter at Breast Height), variety, health and 'structural conditions, review plans:' b. Check with local government:agencies for tree protection ,ordinances. c. Remove any low limbs 'that may be in -the way of construction equipment, and prune as needed to adhere NAA standards. d.. Leave a protective, covering on the soil;.i.e., existing groundcover or mulch. e. Notify all other contractors that these trees are to be saved and protected: f. Install a temporary 6' high metal n070imb fence to protect the trees and their root Systems. install tree.protection.sign,.on fence. " Posts located 10' on center as a.. general rule.:°. For every inch in:diameterof the trunk••(D B.H.) allow up.to foot of radius from the trunk as: the..protected:area...(Example: 24" D.B.H,. = 24':radiu5 of protected root system.) Ideally, we need to.protect more than the drip zone:. The drip zone..into_the truri'k;is.thesupport;eaots that hold the.tree up. The roots from that drip zone out provide=nutrition, .water and oxygen. ;Try:to avoid loss of more; than 30% of root on aiy one side. This.allowS some encroachment within the drip line. Jhis' should be determined on a:Icase by case site conditions reviewed: g:, Identify any insect or disease problems''that may.require treatment. h.:Engineer and design proposed.str.uctu.res and construction to avoid root loss. Bridge type foundations can save major roots i. Design landscape islands and planting areas large enough to accommodate trees at maturity. j. . Plant the right tree in the right place.. Avoid future conflicts with buildings and utilities. k: Have an experienced Arborist review landscape plan to assure the right tree is plarited in the right place and-:proposed changes.don't kill retained mature.trees. 1. Consider tree removals adjacent to trees to be saved for wind related stability concern's. Residential and Commercial. Spraying • Fertilizing • Pruning • Landscape Installation • Landscape Maintenance • Consultation MEMBER: National Arborist Association • International Society of Arboriculture • Oregon Association of Nurserymen Oregon Golf Course Superintendents' Association • Oregon Landscape Contractors Association State Licensed Tree Service 1162635 • Landscape Contractor 115659 • Chemical Application 10000231 • Insured P.O. Box 1566 • Lake Oswego, OR 97035 • 503-635-3165 • Vancouver 360-737-2646 • Salem 503-316-8144 FAX 503-635- 1549 • Visit our website at www.treec:arelandscapes.com M. Check for past and proposed grade and drainage changes, co.nsider'the effects: n...Check trees for stability..: o. Remove all trees that would not survive the effects of change.' Remove all hazardous trees. p: Minimize, environmental changes:..., II.: During Construction a:.;. Keep equipment off of the root system to avoid compaction b: ..Keep equipment away from structure to prevent damage to trunk and limbs. c. .Don't.allbw'chemicals to be_dumped on the. ground near the tree,.i.e.,.gasoline, diesel, paint, herbicide, cleaner,.'thinners, etc. d.:. Provide means-of temporary irrigation if the project runs through the :summer. e.:. If.:roots' or.._limbs:are.:cut or,da.maged; have: them inspected by,:an ISA Certified Arbonst and'epaired or treated according to his/her recommendations:, . f:::.t'rotect'the trees from excessive eaE Le. equipment,._pa.ving. a:nd/or burning.. g:. Avoid trenching through the root systems, boding under..them:.orhand -digging can. save roofs, , . . h.. Contact'the.`ISA:Gert ified Arborist-*-familiar with the. site prior.:to. and..-during any activity within tfie`drip zone or.tr-eeprotection fencing forrconsultation. III: After .Construction: a. Carefully la.hilscape the area.under the:free,-being.careful of"the roots and structure. Us~e'pla'nti.ngs that Will live under the same conditions as that of the'tree. b. Provide insect and disease control, fertilization and pruning as needed or adhere to long term. protection, plan -if provided. c. Avoid direct irrigation spraying onto the trunk.. The amount of. irrigation needed to keep new plantings. alive can often: be enough to kill mature trees:- ' d: Do...not. cb.V& existing root systems with more than 2' of soil. -The more soil you add, the greater the chances of damaging the root system. e. Provide irrigation and/or drainage to emulate pre-construction conditions. NOTE: It would be impossible to provide all of the above protection measures, however the more roots that can be saved and the least amount of surrounding environmental changes that we can prevent; the greater the chances of saving existing trees. Often it is best to replant with the right tree in the right place so it can grown in the new environment. & 1- . - TREE.SURVEY.: Arc hitect`LA _ PM-503-231-i 122 Attn: Larry Abell FX: 503-231-0.317 805 SE.-Sherman.St'-- Portland, OR 972.14 RE: Tigard First Baptist:'. - A10.75:S.W Garrde-St;: Tigard; -'OR' ' Common?:.Name. B61 ni6al;Name , !Additional Comments Viable/ . : : Non-V a ble 'Western`Red.Cedar .Thu`a licata 20. To e l'or ` over lines'=rot hazard Non-Viable 2 Hawthorn _Cratae us 10.`";: ' . Rot .deca _ Non Viable 3 Big Leaf. Maple Ater macro h Ilum' 12 : S '!its . co=dominant hazard Non-Viable 4: Co.ast.`Pine: `Pinus s lvestris . D'.' Pitcfi':Moth diseased Non-Viable Coast:Pine Pinus s lvestris . , : -14:::.. Pitch Moth diseased Non-Viable :..Coast::Pine Finus;s lvestris ..12 Pitch :Moth "diseased r': Non-Viable 7-- . " Coast :Pine Pinus s lvestris :10.'.:_. -Dead : : Non-Viable . 8. Coast-P.in.e: Pinus.s lvestris ~12::` :Pitch Moth diseased . Non-Viable 9. Coast'Rine . Pinus:-s lvestris.- 10.°': 'Pitch--Moth diseased Non-Viable .1.0- Scotch:Pine : X6'.:; C.o-dominant leader -Hazard. Non-Viable T1 ..Scol:0. Pine'.-. :Pinus:s IVestris 6 12 Ash - Fra xmus 6 r: - 13 'Red Alder: glnus ore "ona 4 14- Red Alder:-: :Alms. ore of la 15 Red ~4lder Alnus:pre `ona' :16. = Dou las 'Fir- : : -:Pseudotsu a:.menziesii . 20. -7. Dou 1as-:Fir::. ` - , Pseudotsu' a menziesii., 0.::` ' 18:- .Dou Ias.Fir..:..-... Pseudotsu a.menziesii: -'1 8 30. 19-2 Dou las:'Fr--_ Pseudotsu°'a 'e*nzie'sir• : . . 10:= : . 20. Dou Ias Fir*..' _ Pseudotsu 'a menziesii_ 21 ; .Dou Ias.:Fir..' Pseudotsu 'a; menziesii: • .22'. boo las':Flr::. Pseudotsu a"meniiesn °40 23- : Dou° la's.. Fir ::Qseudotsu amenzlesii::. 18'-:::.'. . 24 : `Dou" Ias.'Fir ` . Ps:eudoCsu' a menzresn 12 25 ' .`Dou' la. s% 'Pseudotsu a`menziesii 26 Dou Ias. Fir... 'Pseudotsu a .menziesii . 24 27` Dou las Fir Pseudotsu a menziesii 24 ' 28._ Douglas Fir Pseudotsu a menziesii. 12 29 Dou las Fir.: ;Pseudotsu a;menziesii , 14' 30 - . Dou las-Fir ;.Pseudotsu a:menziesii . _ 1=2.:; - 31: , : Dou 18 Fir;• - :.Pseudotsu a.1. enziesw. ' :4$ -324' Dou Aa's.Fir: _ . Pseudotsu_ a 'menziesii'... 14 33 ' :Dou lo S Fir: Pseudotsu a~ menziesii ` ,14 " NOTE. : Non-Viable: is dea d, dying, diseased or trees: Trees #11=33 are in-the Environmental Zone. to be retained Residential and Commercial Spraying Fertilizing • Prun ing - Landscape Installation • Landscape Maintenance • Consultation MEMBER: National Arborist Association - Internatio nal Society :of Arboriculture ~ Oregon Association.of Nur serymen Oregon Golf Course Superintendents' Ass ociation • Oregon Landscape Contractors Associafion State Licensed Tree Service #62635 • Landscape Coritractor #5659 • Chemical Application #000231 • Insured P.O. Box 1566 • Lake Oswego, OR 97035 * 503-635-3165 • Vancouver 360-737.-2646 • FAX 503-635- 1549 Visit our website at www.treecarelandscapes.com WAC Series rJ Area Cutoff The Area Cutoff has a compact forward- throw reflector with a main beam of _ 60°+ from vertical (30' from horizontal), providing wide lateral distribution and improved uniformities. A Backlight Shield accessory (standard on WAC Series Wall Mount) permits V adjustable house-side cutoff. J Candlepower distribution curve of 40OW MH 22' WAC Series Wedge Light. 30.5 24.4 163 122 6.1 0. 6.1 121 163 24.4 305 Isofootcandle plot of 40OW MH WAC Series Wedge-Type IV at 25' (7.6 m) mounting height, 0' tilt above horizontal, with backlight shield removed. l.d 120 100' 60' 60 20' 0' 2a 40' 60' Mid d A M I' r r SEE 1 E T Housing Wattage og ;DwAay Mounting Code Prepay Size (sq.) Lamp Number PT.cc (Insert Code at ' in Catalog t) ,4dd~2 WAC Series-Type IV Optics 1 = 1-12' Close Pole Mount b' 16' 15OW PSMH WAC'615-M $254 2 = 6" Extended Mount 22' 32OW PSMH WAG-6932-M 313 W = Wall Mount $2p 16' 1 OOW MH WAC'410-D 241 (Backlight Shield is standard on 16' 175W MH WAC'417-M 229 AC Series Wall Mount) . 22' 175W MH WAC-491-M 293 22' 250W MH WAC'492-M 295 NOTE: When using multiple 22' sq. 22' 1 40OW MH WAC -494-M 306 housings at 90' configuration, a special 16' 100W HPS WAC'510-M 225 12 arm is required; see page 150. 16' 150WHPS WAC-515-M 228 22' 25OW HPS WAC'592 M 309 22' 400WHPS WAC'594-M 317 WPR Series-Type III Optics 1=1-12' Close Pole Mount 8 16' 150W PSMH WPR'615-M $254 2 = 6' Extended Mount $13 VPR Series 22' 320W PSMH WPR'6932-M 313 W = Wall Mount $20 Close Pole Mount 16' 10OW MH WPR'410-0 241 16' 175W MH WPR'417-M 229 22' 175W MH WPR'491-M 293 22' 25OW MH WPR'492-M 295 22" il) 40OW MH WPR'494-M 306 16' 100W HPS WPR'510-M 225 NOTE: When using multiple 22' sq. 16' 15OW HPS WPR'515-M 22S' housings at 90' configuration, a special 12' arm is required; see page 150. ' 22 250W HPS WPR'S92-M 30~ 22' 40OW HPS WPR-594-M 317 WPR Series Other lamp wattages available-consult factory Parking/Roadway T Reduced envelope lamp. ED28 for 32OW PSMH and 40OW MH. The Parking/Roadway Light has a Type Options: (Factory-installed) Change Add After AeAay III asymmetric distribution pattern. Description Suffix To Suffix fAdde: Ideally suited for roadway applications, 277V Reactor Ballast (Psxa+mN1 27 ea adder parking areas or for building mounted 480V ballast (32owPsmH. i75-40 w& 1oo~0 HPso4117) 5 .ca adder security lighting. Quad-volt ballast (100W MH only) M 5 Tri-volt ballast (320W PSMH, T ,a, adder 100-40OW MH & 100-40OW HPS only) (Canada only) t Single Fuse (277V Reactor. 120V. 277V or 347V) 27.1, 2 or 6 Dual ruse (208V, 240V or 480V) 3, 4 or 5 F 22 j Ouartz Standby (delay-relay type) (includes IDow 0IWV) (n/a 277V Reador) D 49 Button Photocell (n/a on 480V) 27.1. 2, 3, 4 or 6 P !5 External Photocell (480V only) 5 P 24 Accent Stripe-tote at end of catalog number prefix: G-Grey. R=Red (WPR15948-M) mo addar Accessories: (field-installed) Wire Guard Pup y 16" housing Puce 22" housing FWG-16 $17 FWG-22 Ae-1-q Puce $35 Backlight Shield (standard on WAC Series Wall Mount) SBL-16 $5 SBL-22 $S' Introduction & Optical Systems J t ...Page 130 I!F 1 Candlepower distribution curve of 40OW Mountings Page 116 PSMH 22' WPR Series Wedge Light. Catalog Number Logic/Voltage Suffix Key Page 131 (Preliminary) Accessories ...................................................Page 133 100' 60 60 40' 27 a 2a 4a 60' e0' 100' 2.7 6.6 0.5 4. 6.3 2.2 f 375 244 163 121 61 Om 61 122 M3 24A 305 Isofootcandle plot of one 40OW HPS WPR Series Wedge-Type III at 30' (9.1 m) mounting height, and 0' tilt above horizontal. (Preliminary) 16'0 (406 mm) 22'0 (559 mm) mm) 9.5' (24 1 222.0 '0 13.4' (34 (340 mm) 16.0 5.1' (1130 mm) 22'0 6.5' (165 mm) 366 Poles ....................................................Pages 154-157 30.5 24.4 16.3 12.2 6.1 Om 6.1 12.2 16.3 74.4 Exclusive DeltaGuard" finish at no extra cost! (800) 236-7000; FAX: (800) 236-7500 Order on-line wwwv.ruudlighting.conl 4 r VIM c u u G O, C l A o, $ o a N~~°~ h~ °r s F F F ! 9 g ~ ~ 8 y V V 0 ° y V 4 VI F ^ ° ~ ~ y 4 ° ° ° ~ ° P F ° F n 4 q ~ n o S 9 ~1 fiti r 4 3gwrra~ ( I a Y t 5 6 CJ o ~a A A D ~ t Z 7th fir.. r f""r 20 S-~ ~H~RCH RSA B AP ~ I AR~ F I ROE STREET 11075 SW DAAGREGGN a ~ ~ TIGER V-4. grA RP; 70 Clean%ter Sekes Our commitment is clear. Jurisdiction Map & Tax Lot Site Address Tigard Date 2S103DCO1100 Owner 11075 SW Gaarde St Contact Tigard, OR 97223 Address Proposed Activity Addition to existing Church+ Phone parking • File Number Clean Water Services Service Provider Letter 2/16/05 Tigard 1 sr Baptist Church Larry Abell 805 SE Sherman St Portland, OR 97214 503-231-1122X20 This form and the attached conditions will serve as your Service Provider Letter in accordance with Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (R&O 04-9). - - _ YES F j NO YES NO . - ; Natural Resources Assessment (NRA) 1 ® - - ❑ I Alternatives Analysis j i Required ❑ 71 Submitted (Section 3.02.6) District Site Visit I Date: 8/12/04 I ® I Tier 1 Alternatives Analysis ❑ i ❑ j - Concur with NRA/or submitted information - - I ® j -1--_ - _ I ❑ Tier 2 Alternatives Analysis ❑ 1 Sensitive Area Present I ( i On-Site wetland/stream ® ❑ j Tier 3 Alternatives Analysis i I ❑ ; I I ~ Sensitive Area Present Off-Site wetland/stream i ® ' ❑ Vegetated Corridor Averaging ® ❑ - ; - Vegetated Corridor Present O Sit I ❑ ❑ ► Vegetated Corridor ® ❑ n- e j Mitigation Required Width of Vegetated 1 i Corridor j -..._.._(feet 50 Ft + 35' from On-Site Mitigation 848 SF break in slope = i ® El ~ Condition of Vegetated 1 Corridor i - j Off-Site Mitigation Degraded _ - ❑ l - - - Enhancement Required - . ® ❑ Planting Plan Attached - ❑ t_.._... - - - } - - i Encroachment into I Vegetated Corridor Enhancement/restoration ® ❑ completion date TBD (Section 3.02.4) Type and Square Footage of Encroachment i Geotechnical Report ( 845 SF parking I required a -T- ❑ Allowed Use Section 3.02.4) ❑ ❑ ! Conditions Attached I ' ® I I El This Service Provider Letter does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. Page 1 of 4 • • File Number In order to comply with Clean Water Services (the District) water quality protection requirements the project must comply with the following conditions: No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the sensitive area which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed by Section 3.02.3. No impacts proposed under this Service Provider Letter. 2. No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the vegetated corridor which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed by Section 3.02.4. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction the vegetated corridor and water quality sensitive areas shall be surveyed, staked, and temporarily fenced per approved plan. During construction the vegetated corridor shall remain fenced and undisturbed except as allowed by Section 3.02.5 and per approved plans. 4. Prior to any activity within the sensitive area, the applicant shall gain authorization for the project from the Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL) and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The applicant shall provide the District with copies of all DSL and USACE project authorization permits. An approved Oregon Department of Forestry Notification is required for one or more trees harvested for sale, trade, or barter, on any non-federal lands within the State of Oregon. 6. Appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) for Erosion Control, in accordance with the CWS Erosion Control Technical Guidance Manual shall be used prior to, during, and following earth disturbing activities. Prior to construction, a Stormwater Connection Permit from the District or its designee is required pursuant to Ordinance 27, Section 4.B. 8. The District or City/County may require an easement over the vegetated corridor conveying storm, surface water management, and/or sanitary sewer rights to the District or City that would prevent the owner of the vegetated corridor from activities and uses inconsistent with the purpose of the corridor and any easements therein. Activities located within the 100-year floodplain shall comply with Section 3.13 of R&O 04-9. 10. Removal of native, woody vegetation shall be limited to the greatest extent practicable. 11. The only encroachments allowed under this Service Provider Letter are the parking spaces in the southwestern portion of the property. The path shown on the attached figure is NOT an approved encroachment. 12. Should final development plans differ significantly from those submitted for review by the District, the applicant shall provide updated drawings, and if necessary, obtain a revised Service Provider Letter. Page 2 of 4 . • File Number SPECIAL CONDITIONS 13. The vegetated corridor width for sensitive areas within the project site shall be a minimum of 50 feet wide, as measured horizontally from the delineated boundary of the sensitive area. 14. For vegetated corridors 50 feet wide or greater, the first 50 feet closest to the sensitive area shall be equal to or better than a "good" corridor condition as defined in Section 3.02.7, Table 3.2. 15. Those portions of the vegetated corridor with greater than 25% slopes shall extend 35 feet from the break in slope. 16. For vegetated corridors that extend 35 feet from the break in slope, the width of vegetated corridor may be reduced to 15 feet wide if a stamped geotechnical report confirms that slope stability can be maintained with the reduced setback from the break in slope. 17. Clean Water Services shall be notified 72 hours prior to the start and completion of enhancement/restoration activities. Enhancement/restoration activities shall comply with the guidelines provided in Landscape Requirements (R&0 04-9: Appendix D). 18. Prior to installation of plant materials, all invasive vegetation within the vegetated corridor shall be removed. During removal of invasive vegetation care shall be taken to minimize impacts to existing native trees and shrub species. 19. Enhancement/restoration of the vegetated corridor shall be provided in accordance with the attached planting plan and R&O 04-9, Appendix D. 20. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction, the applicant shall provide the District with the required vegetated corridor enhancement/restoration plan in compliance with R&O 04-9. 21. Maintenance and monitoring requirements shall comply with Section 2.11.2 of R&O 04-9. If at any time during the warranty period the landscaping falls below the 80% survival level, the Owner shall reinstall all deficient planting at the next appropriate planting opportunity and the two year maintenance period shall begin again from the date of replanting. 22. Performance assurances for the vegetated corridor shall comply with Section 2.06.2, Table 2-1 and Section 2.10, Table 2-2. 23. For any developments, which create multiple parcels or lots intended for separate ownership, the District shall require that the vegetated corridor and the sensitive area be contained in a separate tract. The tract plat shall include language protecting the vegetated corridor and sensitive areas. 24. The water quality swale and detention pond shall be planted with District approved native species, and designed to blend into the natural surroundings. CONDITIONS TO BE INCLUDED ON CONSTRUCTION PLANS 25. Final construction plans shall include landscape plans. Plans shall include in the details a description of the methods for removal and control of exotic species, location, distribution, condition and size of plantings, existing plants and trees to be preserved, and installation methods for plant materials. Plantings shall be tagged for dormant season identification. Tags to remain on plant material after planting for monitoring purposes. Page 3 of 4 • ~ File Number 26. A Maintenance Plan shall be included on final plans including methods, responsible party contact information, and dates (minimum two times per year, by June 1 and September 30). 27. Final construction plans shall clearly depict the location and dimensions of the sensitive area and the vegetated corridor (indicating good, marginal, or degraded condition). Sensitive area boundaries shall be marked in the field. 28. Protection of the vegetated corridors and associated sensitive areas shall be provided by the installation of permanent fencing and signage between the development and the outer limits of the vegetated corridors. Fencing details to be included on final construction plans. This Service Provider Letter is not valid unless CWS-approved site plan is attached. Please call (503) 681-5157 with any questions. vv Astrid Dragoy Environmental Plan Review Attachments (1) Page 4 of 4 NOTE: BOUNDARY LINES ARE FOR GRAPHICAL PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPRESENT PROPERTY LINES • y., S89.59'46•E 99.09* S 89'59_'4[9• E,253.16 / / / / / \ \ \ C, ARY/ CASCMIDNT i or S89•59'48•E Ta2r I*1~• ..r' ~„L' W'j ~ Y W II R P I I J~'7 I / I III / I^P rel z l~I I(11 <(l (l I I / / I i x I l y a ~l f~ / 1 1 1111 ' RI O 1 A a ~/Jape N / S3 ~ pq9 ~q ~ B 0 8.W. G_WEN PK PL : ~ a m t7 ~ bq d 4~ S q $ ' O _ UA f12 /J. I c ti \I I / ~I / 17I~ I h n Aa, Q III III S 69'59'46• E 61.04•I / I ! >/Il f P n - \111/ / / _ r 1 \ I(( ' 1 \ \ IIII I I F I I I I I I / I I/ I \\o\\\ ~lll ll~l 11 I 1 I I - I' • • 1 A ~ ~`I I sI I I I S.W. GARDEN PK PL _ _ _\\~l \ II 14Q1 lyl~ 1 1 ~p 10• SIDE f I I ' I 3\ f lA III / I y ~ \\\\~1 II 1 \ `1\ \h \ I ' / I I KEY STONE \ \ I , \ M I Ae / I \ ~C CO \\~~~\~~1~1 ICI' I'\ I i I I I I fi' I I 3 g 33.00 ~~Illllll II►IY ~I' 11 I\ I I I 1 I I 4 / . ' STEPS II WOE GRAVEL- IN 11,,11,11III1, ICI ~ i w IIIII / KEY STONE I M1ye IIIIII1111II~I I~ ILJId . ► I I d I / ST.,r co IIII IIII►i I I I ~I I I 111 7 1 I N SHOP / CoN~K DAR I Illllllp III ( V I I I ~l I'I 11 1 / STEPS TEP S I I G ry 5•Nbl IIIIIIIIIII111111 11A7 I I 1111111 I11111 1 ,D N ...b IIIOOD °a EI I 1 STEPS NI I 3 ~ ~ C ►ENa Q I III I r+ r l 1I I ra ALL QJ I II I~ ,~lll~; / ►1 ►I I 1 1 1= I I `R~ `5 II IIII IIIII / /,~k~p J / / 111 I I I I 1 i 11 I I I ~ $ m MAIN DOORS TO FO Q. Imo; IIII III I~~ I I III f ~I III I STEP I / i I I• MOgIZ ~ ]IY m f~III~I~IIII// / I~I / I 1 I1IIIII~I 10• WOE ` euaANRS IIII I ; f.3 KEY WALLSTONE J FF 234.93' I Iv 1Y,~~` f CRAVEI ~U• NAOE CHURCH OMCE I 'a KKIN WALL 478_ \ \ R-20 / PM I~ w_ ~ L~31.SS i Y ~ V N ~ P n p „ w y ~ V N -.76.50L a/h 16 S69B6'00•W (0663' - MOETAM S 89'56'00• W 31119'- - - I - ~ 7 I ~ i ~y y$ 2 0 0 COMMUNITY BOUNDARY al YIQ ~Q $ y~ nc arte ANO s 99t JAI R S.W. GAARDE STREET 1; a " a o ' I 1 I @ 8 ~>7 a opt iae~ p ' I I I r n~ A 7" ~A ul " Z s € E E~ ~g$ 91 ~4 AIR BQSt y~R m MAI Q o ~z n 11 > c ° c n F"F,, (n ° 1> Q4e ~y IR; o $~Q p IC" y ° c rl z c ,y 9 0 n z as d Q~ y p~ kL ALAN ~p 6 ~i~ Fy~ O 7~ ti a "s rI AC n 3 c(^7 g n Z ~a c mg ~2 z s R 9 61€. R 7! € i A$Q nl n YI N FI C~ O ~ tSl n A y O 9 > A C 1756 'i s IR B m n m M n YN l'1 x m A a C A ;s a a a k paE Ar. 5 OROOA g 4r18 f$i Z jE ~Q sq py y~ tl CS I FP Q y >ogvri i't Al a2 Q 1F PR T N IM1 A)-07-a N DESCNI GRADING AND EROSION CES~NW TIGARD BAPTIST CHURCH V, CONTROL PLAN 15573 SW BANGN' ROAD, STE 300 ARCHITECT LA LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97,011 805 SE SHERMAN STREET 50.3.968.6655 www.ccsnw,. PORTLAND, OREGON 1177-m w.eASE.owc 503-231-1122 MAR-19-2009 FRI 10;53 FAX No P. 02 MAR-19-2004 10:2b AM OHALLORAN. 603 524 also P.01 Tigard First Baptist Church Neighborhood Meeting 0,31104 b=Wuc'tion of project by. Scott Munger, Tigard first Baptist Task Face director. Presatta60 of wtiat renderings by arcbited Larry Abeq. Explanation of Phase li, Phew II and Phase III, QU"s and Co=ml How tar from tho creek will the paridng tot be? -Lai Hughes Amwer: We will have a Ofoot blamer tie, as replro4 by the city. Are you planning to cut nay trees down by the creek? -I.92Mu s e i ~r1k' ~y Answer. Acl Wly, we are working with an arborist ~rtlclpatirrg Mere an'rrg the namber of rreec What kind of additional plaasiq wild you do n a scroon by the gnaay dope? Wa cwmdy view the grass. now we will we asphalt. Rick Reno Will you plant a hedge by the 110* Suva side to Weld the paddag lot fram the view of the neighborhood? --George Hughes Could you use the Sret entrance (closest to Gairdo Street) pdm lly. i»atead of the second entrance offof 110` Street? We are concarned'about the vitdh;lity entering 110* Strout and speed some motorlsts travel. -Goorgo fhighes r'te' Answer. Ws will kumNcge and build b to shield it We haw hind a hqffic emmhant to slta& /lie ovec tss I hope you consider large plantings to shield the view of the second eatranoe on 1 101 Street. -d.ori Hughes Amway: 77m access poW would be open, but we m" defer to the ft& eVriter. What is the completion date ofeaah Phase? -Bruce Anderson .tnswrr: Phase I would hapqfa16, kgm .smwdm in the mW yw; PAW 11 me aright passtbly begin to caf/uncdon with Pl as,v I; Phar III could cmeelvabO, take anywhere ,1ira» 5 1n 7 years, IIAR-19-2004 FR I 10:540 MAR-19-21804-10:26 AM ONALLORAN FAX a 503 524 9160 It Woks Hce it good.plP to me. It looks well though out. Bt we A>gdersoa Are you pla * the trees as you go or we you w4ft utnil the OWN prOod is compteta. -Jawftr Renrlo Arrow. We will be h vidscqlltg the pmject at eachphw Is completed where did you propose the exit and emty to beg -Rick Rom would it bo possibie to toot have that second e*moe on 110" Sabot, the one that Scau so daWrous? -Lori Hughes Answer: Dw tlqfflc aWblevi an lankfng at all &W rvWmme>& alley will reoonnsend whc d is best f r evajww brvo 8d who Is the traffic consultua your are uslW Can I have his name and m=ber and talk to him about my cormm? Loci Hughes Arsr+er: Ccrv>Irtlyt We am wsb Frank Chw wvum 1 will WHO down hU $01ephOw n mbar avrd let him know you will be w0c. While the tiered la WWAPirag will help the view from C340* street, it woes help Our view ftom 110x'. -Lori Hughes Amer: DK At kndwg7ing will Qnpo JWfi'mYOW P'ePWctiaa. P. 03 P.02 I i 1 i i 02/15/2005 11:24 556179 PRIDE DI&* COMPM PAGE 02/05 own P*R*I* *E DISPOSAL COMPANY P.O. Box 820 Sherwood, OIL 97140 Phone: (503) 625-6177 Fax: (503) 625-6179 February 15, 2005 Mr. Bill Oyen Architect - LA 805 SE Sherman St Portland, OR 97124 Re: Tigard First Baptist Church Enclosure We have reviewed the plan for the above-mentioned trash enclosure; the site plan does not make it clear if there is a post in the center of the enclosure where the gate would meet in the center. As long as there is no post there, we will be able to provide service to the enclosure given the site plans we were provided with. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to give me a call. Tbank you. Sincerely, I Kristin Leichner 02/15/2005 11:24 5*56179 PRIDE DISPOL CCMPM FEE-15-05 TUE 10;39 RM ARCHITECTwLA 303 261 051T a V w Ibj r1w CA o A(a i ~O ~ ~ I ~ 1 ms's' • ~ 6 M 11% PAGE 04/05 F.R)z a !r N N TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH d~q~a 11075 SW OAARDE STREET jp3 s + ~ TIGARD. OREGON 02/15/2005 11:24 5256179 PRIDE DI~ aWM rap-15-05 TUE !0. 0 AM ARC14ITCCTyLA G03 aa~ OZI7 SW 110TH AVE PAGE 05/05 P.02 r 24s-AU r I ) I I ~ I 75' MIN CLEAR I` MASONRY TRASH ENCLOSURE d - 10' X 20' (CLEAR IN-9;0E) WITH I CHAIN UNAK, FULL OPENING GATES IGN WITH DRIVE AISLE , .a 1 1 ,ate ,ys PHASE 3 PARTIAL BrTE PLAN . a s is AO ARCHITECT- LA TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST - BOSSE6NERIuIAN 11075 SW GAARDE ST. TI(MRD, OREGON K"'1 PORTLAND. OR AnfA _ 5031291-1122 2.16.05 - Carlson Geotecliiical Main Office * Salem Office Bend Office P.O. Box23814 060 Hudson Ave., NE P.O. Box 7918 A Division of Carlson Testing, Inc. Tigard, Oregon 97281 Salem, OR 97301 Bend, OR 97708 3eotechnical Consulting Phone (503) 684-3460 Phone (503) 589-1252 Phone (541) 330-9155 construction Inspection and Related Tests FAX (503) 670-9147 FAX (503) 589-1309 FAX (541) 330-9163 Report of Geotechnical Engineering Services Tigard 1st Baptist Church Addition 11075 SW Gaarde Street Tigard, Oregon CGT Project Number G0502465 Prepared for Mr. Larry Abell Architects LA 805 SE Sherman Street Portland, Oregon 97214 February 16, 2005 Carlson Ge o to c * is al Main Office Salem Office Bend Office P.O. Box 23814 060 Hudson Ave., NE P.O. Box 7918 A Division of Carlson Testing, Inc. Tigard, Oregon 97281 Salem, OR 97301 Bend, OR 97708 Geotechnical Consulting Construction Inspection and Related Tests Phone (503) 684-3460 FAX (503) 670-9147 Phone (503) 589-1252 FAX (503) 589-1309 Phone (541) 330-9155 FAX (541) 330-9163 February 16, 2005 Mr. Larry Abell Architects LA 805 SE Sherman Street Portland, Oregon 97214 Report of Geotechnical Engineering Services Tigard 1s' Baptist Church Addition 11075 SW Gaarde Street Tigard, Oregon CGT Project Number G0502465 Dear Mr. Abell: Carlson Geotechnical is pleased to submit the results of our Report of Geotechnical Engineering Services for the Tigard 1s' Baptist Church Addition site located at 11075 SW Gaarde Street in Tigard, Oregon. We performed our work in general accordance with CGT Proposal P03346, dated January 18, 2005. You provided written authorization for our services on January 21, 2005. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. Please call if you have any questions regarding this report. Sincerely, Carlson Geotechnical David P. Holt, PE Senior Geotechnical Engineer Attachments • 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 PROJECT INFORMATION AND SITE DESCRIPTION 5 Project Information 5 Site Geology 6 Site Surface Conditions 6 Site Subsurface Conditions 7 Field Exploration 7 Subsurface Materials 8 Ground Water 9 CONCLUSIONS 9 RECOMMENDATIONS 10 Site Preparation 10 Wet Weather Considerations . 10 Structural Fill . 11 On-site Materials . 11 Imported Granular Material 12 Shallow Foundations 12 Bearing Pressure and Settlement 13 Lateral Capacity 13 Drainage 13 Retaining Walls 14 Drainage 14 Floor Slabs 14 Asphalt Pavements 15 Drainage Considerations 16 Utility Trenches 16 Utility Trench Excavation 16 Trench Backfill Material 17 Permanent Slopes 18 Seismic Design 18 Liquefaction 18 OBSERVATION OF CONSTRUCTION 19 LIMITATIONS 20 0 i Tigard 11' Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for the Tigard 1" Baptist Church Addition site located at 11075 SW Gaarde Street in Tigard, Oregon. The location of the site is shown on the attached Site Location, Figure 1. The purpose of our geotechnical investigation was to evaluate subsurface conditions at the site in order to provide geotechnical- engineering recommendations for design and construction of the development. Our scope of work included the following: • Contact the Oregon Utilities Notification Center to mark the locations of public utilities at the site within a 20-foot radius of our soil boring locations. • Explore subsurface soil conditions at the site by advancing four (4) soil borings to depths of 11 %2 to 16%2 feet below ground surface (bgs) within parking lot areas, and two (2) soil borings to depths of 31'/2 to 41'/2 feet bgs within the addition area. The borings were performed using a Geoprobe 6620DT soil probe machine provided and operated by personnel from Geo- Tech Explorations, Incorporated of Tualatin, Oregon • Classify the materials encountered in the explorations in general accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D2487, and ASTM D2488. A qualified member of CGT's staff maintained a detailed log of each soil boring. • Collect representative soil samples from within the soil borings in order to verify our field classifications, and perform laboratory testing. • Complete twenty-five (25) moisture content tests on representative samples obtained from the soil borings. The moisture content tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM D 2216. • Complete three (3) sieve analyses on representative samples obtained from the soil borings in order to determine percent passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 Sieve. The sieve analyses were performed in general accordance with ASTM C 117, respectively. • Provide recommendations for site preparation, grading and drainage, stripping depths, fill type for imported materials, compaction criteria, cut and fill slope criteria, trench excavation and backfill, use of on-site soils, and wet/dry weather earthwork. • Provide geotechnical-engineering recommendations for design and construction of shallow spread foundations, including an allowable design bearing pressure, and minimum footing depth and width requirements. • Estimate settlement of footings for the assumed design loads. Carlson Geotechnical Page 4 of 21 Tigard I" Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 • Provide recommendations for design and construction of retaining walls, including equivalent fluid pressures for retained soil, and backfill, compaction, and drainage criteria. • Provide geotechnical-engineering recommendations for design and construction of concrete floor slabs, including an anticipated value for subgrade modulus, and recommendations for a capillary break and vapor retarder. • Estimate settlement of floor slabs for the assumed design loads. • Provide design pavement sections, including aggregate base and asphalt concrete thicknesses for parking and drive lane areas, based on an assumed California Bearing Ratio (CBR) value for the on-site soils, and assumed traffic loading. • Provide recommendations for subsurface drainage of foundations, floor slabs, and pavements, if necessary. • Provide recommendations for the International Building Code (IBC) Site Class, mapped maximum considered earthquake spectral response accelerations, site seismic coefficients, and Seismic Design Category. • Qualitatively evaluate liquefaction potential of the soils encountered within the depths explored. • Provide a written report summarizing the results of our geotechnical investigation. PROJECT INFORMATION AND SITE DESCRIPTION Project Information Development will consist of construction of an approximate 8,500-square-foot, single-story, freestanding, building addition with possible full basement, and associated paved parking, drive lanes, and underground utilities. The addition will be located on the west side of the existing church within an existing, asphalt-paved, parking lot. Detailed structural information has not been provided; however, we have assumed that maximum continuous wall and column loads will not exceed 3 kips per lineal foot and 45 kips, respectively, and that uniform floor loads will be less than 100 pounds per square foot (psf). The new parking lots will be located north and west of the addition, with the west parking lot located at the base of an existing 2 to 2%2H:1 V (horizontal:vertical) slope. In order to accommodate the west parking lot, a portion of the hillside will be excavated, and a retaining wall will be constructed. Height of the retaining wall is unknown at this time. Carlson Geotechnical Page 5 of 21 0 0 Tigard 1" Bapiisf Church Addrh00 Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16. 2005 anticipated, provided a full basement is maximum cuts on the order of 11 to 12 the t ar edfloor elevation of the first floor located provided within the building addition, with finish a roximately 3 feet below current site grades. An existing, single-story building located in the pp north parking lot area will be demolished. Site Geology Available geological mapping of the area (Madin, 19901) indicates that the site ilacialdeoutbubst Pleistocene-Age, fine-grained, catastrophic, flood deposits (originating from g 40 , extending to floods of Lake Missoula) consisting of silt, and sanaengormatiotn gravels, feet bgs. These flood deposits are underlain by Troutda depths of about 150 feet bgs, that are interbedded with sandne, siltstone, and claystone. Basalt. The Troutdale Formation gravels are underlain by Columbia River Site surface Conditions The site was bordered by SW Gaarde Street on the south, a residential development tonnthe drainage creek and development on the west, SW 110'h Avenue on the east, an the following site conditions were observed. north. At the time of our field investigation, Within the building addition area, the majority of the site was relatively e the grade asphalt paved (reference Photo 1 below). Along the western boundary of the addition, to the west at an approximate 2 to 21/21-1:1V gradient over a horizontal distance of about 15 feet, and was grass covered (reference Photo 2 below). Photo 1. Looking north from the south- Photo 2. okingthe not h atfrompe the central side of the site at existing parking southwest side lot on west side of church. west side of parking lot in Photo 1. d _ A I qN, . 1990. Earthquake Hazard Geology Maps of the Portland Metropolitan Area, Oregon - Beaverton port 0-90-2. Madin Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral industries. Open File Re Page 6 of 71 Carlson Geotechnical 0 • Tigard 1" Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 Within the west parking lot area, the site sloped to the west at an approximate gradient of 5H:1 V, and was grass covered (reference Photo 2 above). The area within the north parking lot sloped gently to the west. The north half of the site was grass covered, while the south half was asphalt paved (reference Photos 3 & 4 below). An existing, single-story, slab-on-grade, building was located within the central portion of the site. Photo 3. Looking north from the north Photo 4. Looking south from the north- No signs of slope instability, such as tension cracks, slumps, etc., were noted at the site. Site Subsurface Conditions Field Exploration Six Standard Penetration Test (SPT) soil borings (B-1 through B-6), four (4) borings to depths of 11Y2 to 16%2 feet below ground surface (bgs) within parking lot areas, and two (2) borings to depths of 31 %2 to 41Y2 feet bgs within the building addition area, were advanced at the site on February 1, 2005. The borings were performed using a Geoprobe 6620DT soil probe machine provided and operated by personnel from Geo-Tech Explorations, Incorporated of Tualatin, Oregon. The approximate boring locations are shown on the attached Site Plan, Figure 2. The borings were located in the field using a measuring wheel, and marking off distances from existing site features shown on the Site Plan. A member of CGT's staff logged the soils observed within the borings in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS), and collected representative samples of the materials encountered. We have provided an explanation of the USCS on the attached Soil Classification Criteria and Terminology, Figure 3. Our laboratory staff visually examined all samples returned to our laboratory in order to refine the field classifications. Logs of the borings are presented on the attached Figures 4 Carlson Geotechnical Page 7 of 21 end of the existing church. central side of the site. 0 0 Tigard 15' Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 through 9. Results of the moisture content tests and sieve analyses are shown on the attached logs. The SPT is performed by driving a 2-inch, outside-diameter, split-spoon sampler into the undisturbed formation located at the bottom of the advanced probe with repeated blows of a 140-pound, pin-guided, automatic hammer falling a vertical distance of 30 inches. The number of blows, N-Value, required to drive the sampler one foot, the last 12 inches of an 18-inch sample interval, is used to measure the soil consistency (cohesive soil), or relative density (non- cohesive soils). It should be noted that automatic hammers generally produce lower SPT values than those obtained using a traditional safety hammer. Studies have generally indicated that penetration resistances may vary by a factor of 1'/2 to 2 between the two methods. We have considered this in our description of soil consistency, and in our evaluation of soil strength and compressibility. Subsurface Materials Building Addition Area (B-4 and B-5) We encountered medium stiff, transitioning to soft with depth, moist, brown, silt fill (ML) with trace to some gravel at the surface of B-4 that extended to a depth of approximately 6%2 feet bgs. The top 4 inches of the silt fill was rooted. Within B-5, we encountered 1 %2 inches of asphalt pavement underlain by 4 inches of dense, moist, gray, gravel fill (GP) at the surface. The fill within both borings was underlain by native, stiff, transitioning to medium stiff to stiff with depth, moist to very moist to wet with depth, brown-gray (mottled) silt (ML) with sand that extended to the approximate 31 %2 to 41'/2-foot depths of exploration within the borings. Parking Lot Areas (B-1 through B-3, and B-6) We encountered medium stiff, moist, brown-orange, silt fill (ML) at the surface of B-1 and B-2 that extended to depths of about 2%2 to 3%2 feet bgs. The top 4 inches of the silt fill was rooted. Within B-6, we encountered 1 %2 inches of asphalt pavement underlain by 6 inches of dense, moist, gray, gravel fill (GP) at the surface. Beneath the fill within all three (3) borings, and at the surface of B-3, we encountered native, medium stiff to stiff, moist to very moist to wet with depth, brown-gray (mottled) silt (ML) with sand that extended to the approximate 11 %2 to 16%2- foot depths of exploration within the borings. The subsurface materials are described in more detail on the attached soil boring logs, Figures 4 through 9. Carlson Geotechnical Page 8 of 21 • Tigard 1" Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 ('rni inrl Wnfcr Ground water was encountered at depths ranging from approximately 7%2 to 10 feet bgs within the parking lot borings, with the exception of B-3 where no ground water was observed, and 21 to 22%2 feet bgs within the building addition borings. The ground water levels were measured in the borings completed on February 1, 2005. The presence of mottled coloration within the on- site, native silts (ML) is considered an indicator of fluctuating ground water levels. We anticipate that ground water levels will fluctuate due to seasonal variations in precipitation, changes in site utilization, or other factors. Additionally, the on-site silts are conducive to the formation of perched water tables. CONCLUSIONS We encountered fill soils extending to a depth of approximately 6%2 feet bgs within the building addition area. The fill soils consisted of medium stiff, transitioning to soft with depth, moist, brown, silt fill (ML) with trace to some gravel. Direct support of building foundations on these soils is not recommended due to the variability of these soils, and the potential for excessive total and differential settlements. Floor slabs may be supported on these soils provided the recommendations contained within the Site Preparation section of this report are followed. Building foundations should bear on the native, medium stiff to stiff, brown-gray silt (ML) with sand, or on structural fill that is properly placed and compacted on this material during construction. The native silt was generally encountered at depths ranging from approximately %2 to 6%2 feet bgs within the building addition borings. Fill soils were also encountered within some of the parking lot borings. The fill soils consisted of medium stiff, brown-orange, silt fill (ML) that extended to depths of about 2%2 to 3%z feet bgs. The fill soils were underlain by native, medium stiff to stiff, brown-gray silt (ML) with sand. Pavements may be supported on both the native silt and silt fill soils, or on structural fill that is properly placed and compacted on these materials during construction provided the recommendations contained within the Site Preparation section of this report are followed The following paragraphs present specific geotechnical recommendations for design and construction of the development. Carlson Geotechnical Page 9 of 21 Tigard 1S' Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 RECOMMENDATIONS Site Preparation Surface vegetation, organic topsoil, and asphalt pavement should be stripped and removed from proposed building and pavement locations, and for a 5-foot-margin around such locations. Based on the results of our field explorations, the depth of surface vegetation and organic topsoil stripping within proposed building and pavement locations will be on the order of about 6 inches. The depth of asphalt pavement stripping within proposed building and pavement locations will be on the order of about 2 inches. A geotechnical representative from CGT should provide recommendations for actual stripping depths based on observations during site stripping. Stripped surface vegetation and organic topsoil should be transported off-site for disposal, or stockpiled for later use in landscaped areas. Stripped asphalt pavement should be transported off-site for disposal, or stockpiled and processed for re-use as structural fill as recommended in the Structural Fill (On-Site Materials) section of this report. Grubbing of trees should include the removal of the root mass, and roots greater than '/z-inch in diameter. Grubbed material should be transported off-site for disposal. Existing footings, foundation walls, and slabs-on-grade associated with buildings identified for demolition should be completely removed and disposed off-site. After site preparation as recommended above, and prior to excavation for footings, a representative from CGT should observe a proofroll of the exposed subgrade soils in order to identify areas of excessive yielding. If areas of soft soil or excessive yielding are identified, the affected material should be overexcavated to firm, stable subgrade, and replaced with compacted materials as recommended for structural fill. Areas that appear too soft and wet to support proofrolling equipment should be prepared in general accordance with the recommendations for wet weather construction given below. Silt fences, hay bales, buffer zones of natural growth, sedimentation ponds, and granular haul roads should be used as required to reduce sediment transport during construction to acceptable levels. Measures to reduce erosion should be implemented in general accordance with State of Oregon Administrative Rules 340-41-006 and 340-41-455, and Washington County regulations regarding erosion control. Wet Weather Considerations The on-site silts (ML) are highly susceptible to disturbance during wet weather. Trafficability of these soils may be difficult, and significant damage to subgrade soils could occur if earthwork is undertaken without proper precautions at times when the exposed soils are more than a few percentage points above optimum moisture content. Carlson Geotechnical Page 10 of 21 • 0 Tigard 151 Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 For construction that occurs during the wet season, the site preparation activities may need to be accomplished using track-mounted equipment, loading removed material into trucks supported on granular haul roads, or other methods to limit soil disturbance. A qualified geotechnical engineer should evaluate the subgrade during excavation by probing rather than proofrolling. Soils that have been disturbed during site preparation activities, or soft or loose areas identified during probing, should be overexcavated to firm, stable subgrade, and replaced with structural fill. Haul roads subjected to repeated heavy construction traffic will require a minimum of 18 inches of imported granular material. Twelve inches of imported granular material should be sufficient for light staging areas. The imported granular material should consist of crushed rock that is well-graded between coarse and fine, contains no organic matter, debris, or particles larger than 4 inches, and has less than 5 percent material by weight passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 Sieve. The imported granular material should be placed in one lift over the prepared, undisturbed subgrade, and compacted using a smooth-drum, non-vibratory roller. We recommend that a geotextile fabric be placed as a barrier between the subgrade and imported fill in areas of repeated construction traffic. The geotextile fabric should have a minimum Mullen burst strength of 250 pounds per square inch for puncture resistance, and an apparent opening size (AOS) between the U.S. Standard No. 70 and No. 100 Sieves. Structural Fill On-site Materia Use of the on-site silts (ML), free of organic matter and debris, as structural fill may be difficult because silt is sensitive to small changes in moisture content and is difficult, if not impossible, to adequately compact during wet weather. We anticipate that the moisture content of the on- site silts will be higher than the optimum moisture content for satisfactory compaction. Therefore, moisture conditioning (drying) should be expected in order to achieve adequate compaction. When used as structural fill, the on-site silts should be placed in lifts with a maximum thickness of about 8 inches, and compacted to not less than 92 percent of the materials maximum dry density, as determined in general accordance with ASTM D 1557. If the on-site silts cannot be properly moisture-conditioned, we recommend using imported granular material for structural fill. Use of the on-site gravel fill (GP), free of organic matter, debris, and particles larger than 1 %2 inches, as structural fill is not anticipated to be unusually difficult. When used as structural fill, the on-site gravel should be moisture conditioned, placed in lifts with a maximum thickness of Carlson Geotechnical Page 11 of 21 Tigard 1" Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 about 12 inches, and compacted to not less than 95 percent of the materials maximum dry density, as determined in general accordance with ASTM D 1557. If used as structural fill, on-site, stockpiled asphalt should be processed into material that is fairly well graded between coarse and fine, and contain no organic matter, debris, or particles larger than 1 %2 inches. When used as structural fill, the processed asphalt should be moisture conditioned, placed in lifts with a maximum thickness of about 12 inches, and compacted to not less than 95 percent of the materials maximum dry density, as determined in general accordance with ASTM D 1557. Imported Granular Material Imported granular structural fill should consist of angular pit or quarry run rock, crushed rock, or crushed gravel and sand that is fairly well-graded between coarse and fine particle sizes. The granular fill should contain no organic matter, debris, or particles larger than 1Y2 inches, and have less than 5 percent material passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 Sieve. The percentage of fines can be increased to 12 percent of the material passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 Sieve if placed during dry weather, and provided the fill material is moisture-conditioned, as necessary, for proper compaction. Granular fill material should be moisture conditioned, placed in lifts with a maximum thickness of about 12 inches, and compacted to not less than 95 percent of the materials maximum dry density, as determined in general accordance with ASTM D 1557. During the wet season, or when wet subgrade conditions exist, the initial lift thickness should be increased to 24 inches, and should be compacted by rolling with a smooth-drum, non-vibratory roller. Shallow Foundations We recommend that building addition foundations bear on the native, medium stiff to stiff silt (ML) with sand, or on structural fill that is properly placed and compacted on this material during construction. The native silt was generally encountered at depths ranging from approximately %2 to 6%2 feet bgs within the building addition borings. If soft or otherwise unsuitable soils are encountered, they should be overexcavated as recommended by the CGT geotechnical engineer. The resulting overexcavation should be brought back to grade with granular structural fill. All granular pads for footings should be constructed a minimum of 6 inches wider on each side of the footing for every vertical foot of overexcavation. Footings constructed within slopes should have a minimum of 5 feet between the face of the slope, and the bottom, outside edge of the footing. Carlson Geotechnical Page 12 of 21 Tigard 15' Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 We recommend that all individual spread footings have a minimum width of 24 inches, and the base of the footings be founded at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent grade. Continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of 18 inches, and be founded a minimum of 18 inches below the lowest adjacent grade. Excavations near footings should not extend within a 1 H:1 V (horizontal:vertical) plane projected out and down from the outside, bottom edge of the footings. Bearina Pressure and Settlement Footings founded as recommended should be proportioned for a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. This bearing pressure is a net bearing pressure, and applies to the total of dead and long-term live loads, and may be increased by 1/3 when considering seismic or wind loads. For the recommended design bearing pressure, total settlement of footings is anticipated to be less than 1 inch. Differential settlements should not exceed %2-inch. Lateral Capacity We recommend using a passive earth pressure of 250 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) for design for footings confined by the native, medium stiff to stiff silt (ML) with sand, or structural fill that is properly placed and compacted during construction. The recommended earth pressure was computed using a factor of safety of 1'/2, which is appropriate due to the amount of movement required to develop full passive resistance. In order to develop the above capacity, concrete must be poured neat in excavations, the adjacent grade must be level, and the static ground water level must remain below the base of the footings throughout the year. Adjacent floor slabs, pavements, or the upper 12-inch-depth of adjacent, unpaved areas should not be considered when calculating passive resistance. An ultimate coefficient of friction equal to 0.35 may be used when calculating resistance to sliding for footings founded on the native, medium stiff to stiff, silt (ML) with sand, or on structural fill that is properly placed and compacted on this material during construction. Drainage We recommend placing foundation drains at the base elevations of the footings on the outside of the footings. Foundation drains should consist of a 4-inch-diameter, perforated, drainpipe wrapped with a geotextile filter fabric. The drains should be backfilled with a minimum of 1 cubic foot per foot of open graded drain rock, which should be encased in a geotextile fabric Carlson Geotechnical Page 13 of 21 Tigard 1" Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 in order to provide separation from the surrounding silt. CGT should be contacted to observe the drain prior to backfilling. Retaining Walls Retaining wall footings should be designed and constructed in general accordance with the recommendations contained in the Shallow Foundations section of this report. For retaining walls not restrained from rotation, we recommend using an equivalent fluid pressure of 35 pcf for design for level backfill, and 60 pcf for sloping backfill with a maximum gradient of 2H:1 V. For retaining walls restrained from rotation, we recommend using an equivalent fluid pressure of 55 pcf for level backfill, and 90 pcf for sloping backfill with a maximum gradient of 2H:1V. Retaining walls should be backfilled with imported granular material compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of materials maximum dry density, as determined in general accordance with ASTM D 1557 (Modified Proctor). The above design recommendations are based on the assumptions that: (1) the walls consist of conventional cantilevered retaining walls or embedded building walls, (2) the walls are less than 8 feet in height, (3) the backfill is level, drained, and consists of imported granular material, and (4) no surcharges are imposed behind the wall. Re-evaluation of our recommendations will be required if the retaining wall design criteria for the project vary from these assumptions. Drainage We recommend placing wall drains behind the retaining walls at the base of the walls. Wall drains should consist of a 4-inch-diameter, perforated, drainpipe wrapped with a geo-textile filter fabric. The drains should be backfilled with a minimum of 1 cubic foot per foot of open graded drain rock. CGT should be contacted to observe the drain prior to backfilling. Floor Slabs Satisfactory subgrade support for floor slabs constructed on grade, supporting up to 100 psf area loading, can be obtained from the medium stiff, silt fill (ML), the native, medium stiff to stiff silt (ML) with sand, or on structural fill that is properly placed and compacted on these materials during construction. If soft or otherwise unsuitable soils are encountered, they should be overexcavated as recommended by the CGT geotechnical engineer. The resulting overexcavation should be brought back to grade with granular structural fill. Carlson Geotechnical Page 14 of 21 • • Tigard 1S' Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 A minimum 6-inch-thick layer of 3/-inch-minus, crushed rock base containing less than 5 percent material passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 Sieve should be placed over the prepared subgrade in order to provide a more uniform surface for placing concrete, and supporting the slab. The crushed rock should be moisture conditioned, placed in lifts with a maximum thickness of about 6 inches, and compacted to not less than 95 percent of the materials maximum dry density, as determined in general accordance with ASTM D 1557. With the crushed rock base, a subgrade modulus of 150 pounds per cubic inch can be used for the design of the floor slab. Floor slabs constructed as recommended will likely settle less than %2- inch. We recommend that slabs be jointed around columns and walls to permit slabs and foundations to settle differentially. The surface of the base rock should be choked with sand just prior to concrete placement. Choking the base rock surface reduces the lateral restraint on the bottom of the concrete during curing. Due to the presence of on-site, fine-grained silt near the surface of the site, liquid moisture and moisture vapor should be expected at the subgrade surface. The mottled coloration of the on- site, native silts is an indication of fluctuating ground water levels, and suggests that ground water may be present within a few feet beneath floor slabs during wet times of the year. A capillary break, consisting of at least 6 inches of crushed rock base having less than 5 percent of the material passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 Sieve, typically provides protection against liquid moisture. Where moisture vapor emission through the slab must be minimized, e.g. impervious floor coverings, storage of moisture sensitive materials directly on the slab surface, etc., a vapor retarding membrane or vapor barrier below the slab should be considered. Factors such as cost, special considerations for construction, floor coverings, and end use suggest that the decision regarding a vapor retarding membrane or vapor barrier be made by the architect and owner. Asphalt Pavements Satisfactory subgrade support for asphalt pavements constructed on grade can be obtained from the medium stiff, silt fill (ML), the native, medium stiff to stiff silt (ML) with sand, or on structural fill that is properly placed and compacted on these materials during construction. If soft or otherwise unsuitable soils are encountered, they should be overexcavated as recommended by the CGT geotechnical engineer. The resulting overexcavation should be brought back to grade with granular structural fill. Carlson Geotechnical Page 15 of 21 0 Tigard 151 Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 We recommend a minimum asphalt pavement section of: 0 Table 1. Recommended Minimum Asphalt Pavement Section .Entrance & Service Roads* Car Parking" Material Thickness (i,nche's) . Thickness (inches) Asphalt Pavement 3%2 2'/2 Crushed Rock Base Course $ 6 "Based on 5 trucks and 500 cars per day "Based on 1 truck and 300 cars per day. The design of the recommended asphalt pavement section is based on an assumed California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of 3 for the on-site silts, and on the assumption that construction will be completed during an extended period of dry weather. Increased base rock sections, and/or a separation geotextile fabric may be required in wet conditions in order to support construction traffic and protect the subgrade. Asphalt pavement, and base course material should conform to the 2002 State of Oregon, Standard Specifications for Highway Construction. Place aggregate base in one lift, and compact to not less than 95 percent of the materials maximum dry density, as determined in general accordance with ASTM D 1557. Asphalt pavement should be compacted to at least 91 percent of the materials theoretical maximum density, as determined in general accordance with ASTM D 2041 (Rice Specific Gravity). Drainage Considerations We recommend that subsurface drains be connected to the nearest storm drain or other suitable discharge point. We also recommend that paved surfaces, and ground near or adjacent to the building be sloped to drain away from the building. Surface water from pavement surfaces and open spaces should be collected and routed to a suitable discharge point. Runoff from roof and pavement areas should not be directed into the foundation drain system. Utility Trenches Utility Trench Excavation Trench cuts should stand near vertical to depths of approximately 4 feet in the medium stiff to stiff silts (ML) provided no ground water seepage is observed in the sidewalls. If seepage is Carlson Geotechnical Page 16 of 21 0 Tigard I" Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 • encountered that undermines the stability of the trench, or caving of the sidewalls is observed during excavation, the sidewalls should be flattened or shored. Trench dewatering may be required to maintain dry working conditions if the invert elevations of the proposed utilities are below the ground water level. Pumping from sumps located within the trench will likely be effective in removing water resulting from seepage. If ground water is present at the base of utility excavations, we recommend placing trench stabilization material at the base of the excavations. Trench stabilization material should consist of 1-foot of well- graded gravel, crushed gravel, or crushed rock with a maximum particle size of 4 inches, and less than 5 percent material passing the U.S. Standard No. 4 Sieve. The material should be free of organic matter and other deleterious material, and should be placed in one lift and compacted until well-keyed. While we have described certain approaches to the trench excavation, it is the contractor's responsibility to select the excavation and dewatering methods, to monitor the trench excavations for safety, and to provide any shoring required to protect personnel and adjacent improvements. All trench excavations should be in accordance with applicable OSHA and state regulations. Trench Backfill Material Trench backfill for the utility pipe base and pipe zone should consist of well-graded granular material containing no organic matter or debris, have a maximum particle size of 3/4-inch, and have less than 8 percent material passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 Sieve. Backfill for the pipe base and within the pipe zone should be moisture conditioned, placed in maximum 12-inch-thick lifts, and compacted to not less than 90 percent of the materials maximum dry density, as determined in general accordance with ASTM D 1557, or as recommended by the pipe manufacturer. Backfill above the pipe zone should be moisture conditioned, placed in maximum 12-inch-thick lifts, and compacted to not less than 92 percent of the materials maximum dry density, as determined in general accordance with ASTM D 1557. Trench backfill located within 2 feet of finished subgrade elevation should be moisture conditioned, placed in maximum 12-inch-thick lifts, and compacted to not less than 95 percent of the materials maximum dry density, as determined in general accordance with ASTM D 1557. Carlson Geotechnical Page 17 of 21 • Tigard 11' Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 Permanent Slopes 0 Permanent slopes should not exceed 2H:1 V. Adjacent on-site and off-site structures should be located at least 5 feet from the top of slopes. Footings constructed within slopes should have a minimum of 5 feet between the face of the slope, and the bottom, outside edge of the footing. Seismic Design Based on the results of our subsurface explorations and analyses, the following International Building Code (IBC) design criteria were computed using the 2003 IBC: Table 2. IBC Design Criteria IBC Coefficient : „ _ . Value IBC Source Site Class D Table 1615.1.1 SS 1.05 Figure 1615(1) Fa 1.08 Table 1615.1.2(1) S, 0.37 Figure 1615(2) F, 1.66 Table 1615.1.2(2) SMS 1.13 Equation 16-38 SM1 0.61 Equation 16-39 SoS 0.75 Equation 16-40 Sp, 0.41 Equation 16-41 Category" II Table 1604.5 Seismic Use Group I Paragraphs 1616.2.1, 1616.2.2, or 1616.2.3 Seismic Design Category D Tables 1616.3(1), and 1616.3(2) -it tnis is not correct, please inform us in writing so that changes to our recommendations can be made, if warranted. Liquefaction In general, liquefaction occurs when deposits of loose, saturated soils, generally sands, and sand-silt mixtures, are subjected to strong earthquake shaking. If these deposits cannot drain rapidly, there will be an increase in the pore water pressure. With increasing oscillation, the Carlson Geotechnical Page 18 of 21 Tigard 1s` Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 pore water pressure can increase to the value of the overburden pressure. The shear strength of a cohesionless soil is directly proportional to the effective stress, which is equal to the difference between the overburden pressure and the pore water pressure. When the pore water pressure increases to the value of the overburden pressure, the shear strength of the soil reduces to zero, and the soil deposit turns into a liquefied state. The following parameters are generally used to designate non-liquefiable, fine-grained soils: • Fines content (percent passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 Sieve) greater than 80 percent. • Clay content (particle size less than 0.005 mm) exceeding 20 percent. • Liquid limit greater than 35 percent. • Water content less than 90 percent of the liquid limit. Due to the fine-grained nature of the on-site silts (ML) encountered at this site, within the depths explored, this soil is considered non-liquefiable. OBSERVATION OF CONSTRUCTION Satisfactory pavement and earthwork performance depends to a large degree on the quality of construction. Sufficient observation of the contractor's activities is a key part of determining that the work is completed in accordance with the construction drawings and specifications. Subsurface conditions observed during construction should be compared with those encountered during subsurface explorations, and recognition of changed conditions often requires experience. We recommend that qualified personnel visit the site with sufficient frequency to detect whether subsurface conditions change significantly from those observed to date and anticipated in this report. We recommend that site stripping, rough grading, foundation, floor slab, and pavement subgrades, and placement of engineered fill are observed by the project geotechnical engineer or their representative. Because observation is typically performed on an on-call basis, we recommend that the earthwork contractor be held contractually responsible for scheduling observation. Carlson Geotechnical Page 19 of 21 • Tigard 15` Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for use by the owner/developer and other members of the design and construction team for the proposed development. The opinions and recommendations contained within this report are not intended to be, nor should they be construed as a warranty of subsurface conditions, but are forwarded to assist in the planning and design process. We have made observations based on our explorations that indicate the soil conditions at only those specific locations and only to the depths penetrated. These observations do not necessarily reflect soil types, strata thickness, or water level variations that may exist between explorations. If subsurface conditions vary from those encountered in our site exploration, CGT should be alerted to the change in conditions so that we may provide additional geotechnical recommendations, if necessary. Observation by experienced geotechnical personnel should be considered an integral part of the construction process. The owner/developer is responsible for insuring that the project designers and contractors implement our recommendations. When the design has been finalized, we recommend that the design and specifications be reviewed by our firm to see that our recommendations have been interpreted and implemented as intended. If design changes are made, we request that we be retained to review our conclusions and recommendations and to provide a written modification or verification. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with the generally accepted practices in this area at the time this report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions express or implied, should be understood. Carlson Geotechnical Page 20 of 21 • Tigard I" Baptist Church Addition Tigard, Oregon G0502465 February 16, 2005 • We appreciate the opportunity to serve as your geotechnical consultant on this project. Please contact us if you have any questions. Sincerely, CARLSON GEOTECHNICAL PRO)- GIN FL so iu d0337PE OREGON pq~ 13, R Expires.--<.,Z David P. Holt, PE William M. Weyrauch, PE Senior Geotechnical Engineer Senior Geotechnical Engineer Attachments: Site Location, Figure 1 Site Plan, Figure 2 Soil Classification Criteria and Terminology, Figure 3 Soil Boring Logs, Figures 4 through 9 Doc ID: P:\GEOTECMPROJECTS\2005 Projects\Tigard 1st Baptist Church\Tigard 1st Baptist Church Geo Report.doc Carlson Geotechnical Page 21 of 21 z SITE LOCATION TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ADDITION - TIGARD, OREGON ' I t 't ~ ' i~: 1 . J' ~t ~ • l\•( • ~ ma'r' ~ } s• f ~ f / < q.~ rf _ '',i':h. rnf--..~ ~ _-,r-~ ~flt,Y<•'~~.-.~,rlr-,-°.•ti ~ ~ •a\~*► f . r ~ :`.~.rl ,f ~ 7,, A•~k~ l~r`;;,,• ~fi•~~ir, i , ~ t ,Ir r' ° ~f` )~`,1~;ftti,:,'-};i i~ • ,W _ - 1 ~ yy.~~-~'~>.. • ~~C', +Q 'C>} : ~l~•Any )T1j '~~L-~;_. _ ' :Q 1ff },,rr~- ~G~i Jr~~ _ -~II• ~,TI- },i.'!$R Y •i~~, ~r.•~ ~•s`+ )1 2'. ~~.r Styr 5 t l /!f - y~ ? r'i~Yy; Tixa W Ev -its LOCATION R'• • { , ar - ' ~ i %IrJ"v-M~t 9: l ~ 'I ~ w ~ 1 ~ r. • i r`_?!~ K ;t ~ , . ~ti: Z) ~c + •li~, :ih.•.• _ i ,r~ J •y~.",~ <t55 _.Z:.-•-:. a•,-• •I ti ~ ti'/(i~~~`'`,7 l°~ r'-~r•~~1 ~ • `+f .i• r. ~ • ~L,S i .f-. i'._..^ l)D - ~1•`• -r,..\•.` ,rte ) e 6 r~~-~ .~.LJ,`~ i• + 'l. 12 •-1/ ` l Wiz'" ~ ,a ~ i ; Lis ~t'•., -`may.' ff~r1 N, J_ ~ t r rr. ~ ~ r r- ` l _ : ;~+5, r,r ~ " ' / ! - ! - .:1~1 ~~`ti! ~~1 o C ' ~ } 10 ' `i r~• h~"~ F~ I r } ! r { y` e f t ` Jr , • r'' , J ~ ` - e l j ?.../I!? / ` r~~ ~L'.~=%~ ' r ~ (J4 ~r ~'.ti.._r,',~ t • ~ y (c \ h p "1 ~ i V 40,0 ~:--':A, ^Y'.~ G~,y,~_~ `r ~ •SYx../.r YrLER. _ _ 'J''--•j ~1 ~ "4a / .1h .-4' E w . i t j+~''' j!1" ~'.`j . - - I o ~ L =••t~Y=.`>• IR }n~py• WSJ ~y,~ ~ l l' ' 'J ( f r f ~ , :~7 r 1 Lj / r? .Y. I~$ li'•- rta,ii j ,t 'i ~'Iy-~%V r. ~ - - - • > > • } 'J. r-„ L.l l ~~r ` ~ pr's a Map created with TOPO!TIA @2000 Wildflower Productions (www.topo.com). Scale 1 Inch - 2.000 feet USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Series. Beaverton, OR Quadrangle. Map version 1961. Photorevised 1984. Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Section 3. Willamette Meridian. 0 2000 4000 GPaG1T~y Carlson Geotechnical L 1` P.O. Box 23814 CGT Job No. G0502465 FIGURE 1 503.6® Tigard, Oregon 97281 /I A - SITE PLAN TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ADDITION - TIGARD, OREGON NORTH N. I f ~s Ra[W Ma Mlw AlNM1lR r.4 0 TT, irT. . `'mom R ~.tl LLUILLLLIfil B 3 B-6 B-5 ~ . ' 0 B -2. -113 49 NOTES: 1. Site plan provided by Larry Abell of Architects LA. Drawing was reproduced and modified by CGT staff. 2. All locations are approximate. GT~~, Carlson Geotechnical P.O. Box 23814 503.684.3460 Tigard, Oregon 97281 LEGEND B-1 & Location of drilled boring Scale 1 inch = 120 feet 0 120 240 I I~ wlw~ P~fu~ale CGT Job No. G0502465 Date: 02/0312005 FIGURE 2 O~ • • SOIL CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA AND TERMINOLOGY TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ADDITION - TIGARD, OREGON Classification of Terms and Content USCS Grain Size NAME : MINOR Constituents (12-50%); MAJOR Fines <#200 (.075 mm) Constituents (>50%); Slightly (5-12%) Relative Density or Consistency Color Sand Fine #200 - #40 (.425 mm) Medium #40 - #10 (2 mm) Coarse #10 - #4 (4.75) Moisture Content Plasticity Gravel Fine #4 - 0.75 inch Coarse 0.75 inch - 3 inches Trace Constituents (0-5%) Other: Grain Shape, Approximate gradation, Organics, Cement, Structure, Odor.... Cobbles 3 to 12 inches; scattered <15% est., numerous >15% est. Geologic Name or Formation: (Fill, Willamette Silt, Till, Alluvium,...) Boulders > 12 inches Relative Densit or Consistenc Granular Material Fine-Grained cohesive Materials SPT N-Value Density SPT Torvane tst Pocket Pen tsf Manual Penetration Test N-Value Shear Stren th Unconfined Consistency <2 <0.13 >0.25 Very Soft Easy several inches b fist 0-4 Ve Loose 2-4 0.13-0.25 0.25-0.50 Soft Easy several inches b thumb 4-10 Loose 4-8 0.25-0.50 0.50-1.00 Medium Stiff Moderate several inches b thumb 10 - 30 Medium Dense 8-15 0.50-1.00 1.00-2.00 stiff Readily indented b thumb 30 - 50 Dense 15 - 30 1.00-2.00 2.00-4.00 Very Stiff Readily indented b thumbnail >50 Very Dense >30 >2.00 >4.00 Hard Difficult b thumbnail Moisture Content Dry: Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch Damp: Some moisture but leaves no moisture on hand Moist: Leaves moisture on hand Wet: Visible free water, like) from below water table Structure Stratified: Alternating layers of material or color >6 mm thick Laminated: Alternating layers < 6 mm thick Fissured: Breaks along definate fracture planes Slickensided: Striated, polished, or glossy fracture planes Plasticity Dry Strength Dilatancy ML Non to Low Non to Low Slow to Rapid CL Low to Med. Medium to High None to Slow MH Med to High Low to Medium None to Slow CH Med to High High to V. High None Toughness Low, can't roll Medium Low to Medium High Blocky: Cohesive soil that can be broken down into small angular lumps which resist further breakdown Lenses: Has small pockets of different soils, note thickness Homogeneous: Same color and appearance throughout Unified Soil Classification Chart Visual-Manual Proced ure Similar to ASTM Designation D-2488 Major Divisions Group Symbols Typical Names Coarse Gravels: 50% Clean GW Well graded ravels and ravel-sand mixtures tittle or no fines Grained or more Gravels GP Poorly-graded ravels and ravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines Soils: retained on Gravels GM Silty ravels, ravel-sand-silt mixtures More than the No. 4 sieve with Fines GC Clayey ravels, gravel-sand-clay mixtures 50% retained Sands: more Clean SW Well-graded sands and ravel) sands, little or no fines on No. 200 than 50% Sands SP Poorly-graded sands and gravel) sands, little or no fines sieve passing the Sands SM Silt sands, sand-silt mixtures No. 4 Sieve with Fines SC Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures Fine-Grained ML Inorganic silts rock flour, clayey silts Soils: Silt and Clays w Pl L ti it Fi CL Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, ravel) clays, sand clays, lean clays 50% or more o y nes as c OL Organic silt and organic silt clays of low plasticity Passes No. Silt d Cl MH Inorganic silts, clayey silts 200 Sieve an ays High Plasticity Fines CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays OH Organic clays of medium to high plasticity Hi hl Organic Soils PT Peat muck, and other highly organic soils GQ' y Carlson Geotechnical P.O. Box 23814 CGT Job No. G0502465 FIGURE 3 503.684.3460 Tigard, Oregon 97281 1 ~ EXPLORATORY BORING LOG B-1 TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ADDITION - TIGARD, OREGON Project Number: G0502465 Date Drilled: 02/1/2005 Drilled by: GeoTech Explorations, Inc. Logged By: Brad Wilcox Drill Rig/Method: Geoprobe 6620DT/GH60 Hammer Surface Elevation: Unavailable v SOIL DESCRIPTION _ 3 w w a y i!_ = 711 o > z TEST RESULTS ♦ Standard Penetration Test, Blows per Foot 0 25 SO ML Medium stiff, brown-orange, SILT FILL with trace gravel; upper 4 inches rooted; moist. S-1 7 0 -i - 2 5 - - - - ML Stiff, brown-light gray (mottled) SILT with sand; moist. S-2 12 , 5 Very stiff below 5 feet. S-3 21 ' - _ i . 23 Medium stiff gray and very moist below 7 5 feet S-4 6 , , . . '3 - 3 - i Wet, with ground water level estimated at 10 feet S-5 5 ' . I ` i 0 ~ AAA ~ ~ ~ ! r _ 5 S-6 5 I i i i39 I i t I Boring terminated at 16.5 feet below ground surface (bgs). i Gro nd t t d t 10 f u wa er was encoun ere a eet bgs. Boring was backfilled with granular bentonite on 2/1/2005 . I I i I 2 ' i 25 I I I I - - - - - i 41 - - - 30 ~ 4 - ; -L - ' - - r - _L'. ' 1 - 1_ 35 I i I -1- i i ! I Note: Boring backfilled with granular bentonite on 01/31/05 - L-- - - --.!--w.-- - - - - t = Water Level Moisture Content in Percent S-1 Dames 8 Moore Sample S-1 Split-spoon Sample S-1 Shelby Tube Sample Notes: 1. Soil interfaces and descriptions are inter retive and actual chan es and transitions ma b r l d CARLSON GEOTECHNICAL P.O. Box 23814 Tigard, Oregon p g y . e g a ua 2. water level is for date shown and may vary with the time of year. 3 USC classification are determined by visuat-manual method. Figure: 4 1 ~ EXPLORATORY BORING LOG B-2 TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ADDITION - TIGARD, OREGON Project Number: G0502465 Date Drilled: 02/1/2005 Drilled by: GeoTech Explorations, Inc. Logged By: Brad Wilcox Drill Rig/Method: Geoprobe 6620DT/GH60 Hammer Surface Elevation: Unavailable 0 SOIL DESCRIPTION z w 0 a cD 3 ~ w J y, Q X Q W = t° ~ = > w Z TEST RESULTS ♦ Standard Penetration Test, Blows per Foot 0 25 50 ML Medium stiff, brown, SILT FILL with some gravel, upper 4 inches rooted; moist. S-1 7 - i- - - - - - - ; S-2 7 ' ML Medium stiff to stiff brown-light gray (mottled) SILT with , , sand; very moist. S-3 8 5 - T - - 3 4 - - I Soft, gray, and wet with ground water level estimated at S-4 2 , 7.5 feet. 6oC 4 ; 2 Stiff b l 1 10 e ow 0 feet. S-5 12 o Boring terminated at 11.5 feet below ground surface (bgs) _ . Ground water was encountered at 7.5 feet bgs. Boring was backfilled with granular bentonite on 2/1/2005 ' . 1 5 i I ! I . I i I i I _ 2D I 1 ; i 25 I i L i-L 30 I L. 7_7 i i i i i i j Legend = Water Level Moisture Content in Percent S-1 Dames & Moore Sample S-1 Split spoon Sample S-1 Shelby Tube Sample Notes: 1. Soil interfaces and descriptions are inter retive and a l h iti t d t b l d CARLSON GEOTECHNICAL P.O. Box 23814 Tigard, Oregon p c ua c anges an rans ons may e gra ua . 2. Water level is for date shown and may vary with the time of year. I USC classifications are delennined by visual-manual method. Figure: 5 Ah a EXPLORATORY BORING LOG B-3 TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ADDITION - TIGARD, OREGON Project Number: G0502465 Date Drilled: 02/1/2005 Drilled by: GeoTech Explorations, Inc. Logged By: Brad Wilcox Drill Rig/Method: Geoprobe 6620DT/GH60 Hammer Surface Elevation: Unavailable SOIL DESCRIPTION W 3 W w a a `r' F > o Z TEST RESULTS ♦ Standard Penetration Test, Blows per Foot 0 25 50 ML Medium stiff, brown, SILT with sand, upper 6 inches rooted; moist. S-1 9 -L - L__1_ i i - - - - - - Slightly mottled below 2.5 feet. S-2 4 ! ! i i 26__- - S-3 4 5 i 28~ . Brown-light gray (mottled) below 6 feet . Stiff below 7.5 feet. S-4 14 9 ! 10 i S-5 8 33 Boring terminated at 11.5 feet below ground surface (bgs) . Ground water was not encountered. ; Boring was backfilled with granular bentonite on 2/1/2005 . ' i I I ! 15 I t I I! l ; I ! ! I t ! i ! I ! ' I! I I I I 20 i j ! i I I i ~ ! i 25 I ! ; j I -r _L - _ ` - - - 30 i i 35 I I I i = Water Level Moisture Content in Percent S-1 Dames & Moore Sample S-1 Split spoon Sample S-1 Shelby Tube Sample Notes: 1. Soil interfaces and descri tions are inter r ti l h l d t i i CARLSON GEOTECHNICAL P.O. Box 23814 Tigard, Oregon p p ve an ac . e ua c anges and trans ons may be gradua t 2. Water level is for date shown and may vary with the time of year. I USC classirications are determined by visual-manual method. L` Figure: 6 r♦ a EXPLORATORY BORING LOG B-4 TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ADDITION - TIGARD, OREGON Project Number: G0502465 Date Drilled: 0211/2005 Drilled by: GeoTech Explorations, Inc. Logged By: Brad Wilcox Drill Rig/Method: Geoprobe 6620DT/GH60 Hammer Surface Elevation: Unavailable U M SOIL DESCRIPTION _ 0 3 w W a M m i = Co o z TEST RESULTS ♦ Standard Penetration Test, Blows per Foot o is so ML Medium stiff, brown, SILT FILL with some gravel, upper 4 inches rooted; moist. S-1 9 - - 46 i t - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ Soft with trace gravel and fine sand below 2 5 feet S-2 2 , . . 1 -28 S-3 4 5 - ' - - = i ML Stiff, brown-light gray (mottled), SILT with sand; moist. 73 percent passing the U S No 200 Sieve S-4 12 . . . . 1 - 2$ L o f S-5 15 1 28 I 1 - - i - i i I I Medium stiff and very moist below 15 feet S-6 5 15 , . 1 i i i I. ' S-7 20 4 1 33 i _ i Turns wet with ground water level estimated at i _ , ® - 22.5 feet. ®A 2 81 percent passing the U 200 Sieve S No S-8 5 4 V . . . . A 1 t - - 34 30 Stiff, and medium gray to gray below 30 feet. S-9 7 t - -I a -_39' i I _ A- ` - - - 35 -1 j (log continued on next page) Legend = Water Level • Moisture Content in Percent S-1 Dames & Moore Sample S-1 Split-spoon Sample S-1 Shelby Tube Sample Notes: ~j 1 Soil interfaces and descri ti i t i CARLSON GEOTECHNICAL P.O. Box 23814 Tigard, Oregon . p ons are n erpret ve and actual changes and transitions may be gradual. 2 Water level is for date shown and may vary with the time of year 3. USC classifications are determined by visual-manual method. Figure: 7 EXPLORATORY BORING LOG B-4 (cont.) TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ADDITION - TIGARD, OREGON Project Number: G0502465 Date Drilled: 021112005 Drilled by: GeoTech Explorations, Inc. Logged By: Brad Wilcox Drill Rig/Method: Geoprobe 6620DT/GH60 Hammer Surface Elevation: Unavailable w w :3 = TEST RESULTS SOIL DESCRIPTION a a a w ♦ Standard Penetration Test, Blows per Foot cv3 mz N Z 0 25 50 ML Stiff, medium gray to gray, SILT with sand; wet. 0 5_ p©p - - - 77! 7 85 percent passing the U.S. No. 200 Sieve. 0p0 S-10 119 Boring terminated at 41.5 feet below ground surface (bgs). Ground water was encountered at 22.5 feet bgs. Boring was backfilled with granular bentonite on 2/1/2005. Legend = Water Level • Moisture Content in Percent CARLSON GEOTECHN/CAL S-1 Dames & Moore Sample S-1 Split spoon Sample S-1 Shelby Tube Sample P.O. Box 23814 Notes: Tigard, Oregon 1 il i S f t d d i i . o n er aces an pt escr ons are interpretive and actual changes and transitions may be gradual. 2. Water level is for date shown and may vary with the lime of year. 3. USC classifications are determined by visual-manual method. Figure: (cont.) a EXPLORATORY BORING LOG B-5 TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ADDITION - TIGARD, OREGON Project Number: G0502465 Date Drilled: 02/1/2005 Drilled by: GeoTech Explorations, Inc. Logged By: Brad Wilcox Drill Rig/Method: Geoprobe 6620DT/GH60 Hammer Surface Elevation: Unavailable L) SOIL DESCRIPTION = w a U 3 w W a a N= y TEST RESULTS > a ♦ Standard Penetration Test, Blows per Foot O Z 0 25 50 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE: 1.5-inch de th. o GP Dense, gray, GRAVEL FILL; 4-inch depth, moist. - - - i = - - - - - - - ML Stiff, brown-light gray (slightly mottled), SILT with sand; S-1 10 very moist. - - - - - S-2 12 -3 3- l S-3 8 i ~ -32 - - i ~ Medium stiff and brown below 10 feet S-4 6 10 , . 1 -~30 S-5 5 1 ' i 15 Brown-light gray (mottled) below 15 feet. S-6 8 - 3 4 Very soft below 20 feet. 84 percent passing the S-7 1 2 U S N 200 Si ~29' . . o. eve. Turns wet, with ground water level measured at 21 0 f t ith t t l d d d f ~0 ee w wa er soun upon remova er, con uc e o 0 - drill stem. - -'-T - 0 - - 0 0 Medium stiff below 25 feet 0 S-8 5 25- - _ . 050 30- Gray below 30 feet. S-9 1+ i 4 Boring terminated at 31.5 feet below ground surface (bgs). Ground water was encountered at 21 feet bgs. Boring was backfilled with granular bentonite on 2/1/2005. _ I 35 _ - -1 - T Legend = Water Level • Moisture Content in Percent S-1 Dames & Moore Sample S-1 Split-spoon Sample S-1 Shelby Tube Sample CARLSON GEOTECHNICAL P.O. Box 23814 Notes: Tigard, Oregon 1. Soil interfaces and descriptions are interpretive and actual changes and transitions may be gradual. 2. Water level is for date shown and may vary with the time of year. Figure: p O 3. USC classifications are determined by visual manual method. 1 r EXPLORATORY BORING LOG B-6 TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ADDITION - TIGARD, OREGON Project Number: G0502465 Date Drilled: 02/1/2005 Drilled by: GeoTech Explorations, Inc. Logged By: Brad Wilcox Drill Rig/Method: Geoprobe 6620DT/GH60 Hammer Surface Elevation: Unavailable SOIL DESCRIPTION Z 0 a U i w w Q M Q ~ y z n :3 = : z ° TEST RESULTS ♦ Standard Penetration Test, Blows per Foot 0 25 50 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE; 1.5-inch depth. -t--t GP Dense, gray, GRAVEL FILL; -6-inch depth; moist. 1:- t- - - ML tiff M di b -li ht li htl ttl d SILT - - ; I I , rowr4 um s g gray (s g e y mo e with ! sand; very moist. S-1 g I ~ -L_32 - 5 " i S-2 7 1 , ! -31 i - S-3 6 I , i ! IT 10 ! I i Wet, with ground water level estimated at 10 feet. , S-4 4 ! 0®0 1 Boring terminated at 11 5 feet below ground surface (bgs) . . - Ground water was encountered at 10 feet bgs. Boring was backfilled with granular bentonite on 2/1/2005 . i 15 i ! i I i ! I I i I I i , I I 20 , i i I ! i ! 25 I i I I I i ~ I 30 35 . i i i. , l egend = Water Level Moisture Content in Percent S-1 Dames & Moore Sample S-1 Split-spoon Sample S-1 Shelby Tube Sample Notes: 1 Soil interfaces and descri ti n i t ti d l h CARLSON GEOTECHNICAL P.O. Box 23814 Tigard, Oregon p o s are n erpre ve an actua c anges and transitions may be gradual. 2. Water level is for date shown and may vary with the time of year. 3. USC classifications are determined by visual-manual method. igure: • • Memorandum TO: City of Tigard FROM: John D. Jensen, P.E. SUBJECT: TIGARD BAPTIST CHURCH - ORN PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY/QUANTITY CALCULATIONS DATE: February 14, 2005 Enclosed please find the narrative and supporting calculations addressing CWS' water quality and quantity standards for surface water management EXISTING CONDITIONS The Tigard Baptist Church project is located on the Northwest corner of the intersection of SW Gaarde Street and SW 110th Avenue. Site elevations range from 257 feet down to 208 feet in a northwesterly direction. A no-named tributary of Fanno Creek crosses the western portion of the site flowing from the South to the North. According to the Soil Conservation Service's soil survey of Washington County there are Woodburn silt loams located at the site. Woodburn silt loam soils are classified as hydrologic group 'C' with moderate erosion potential. WATER QUALITY The preliminary water quality calculations are based on the CWS design standards R&O 04-09. It is anticipated the proposed project will meet CWS' water quality standard of 65% removal of phosphorous with a combination of sumped catch basins, a water quality manhole, and a water quality swale. A total of approximately 86,120 square feet of new and existing impervious surfaces will be treated in the swale. Of this, 59,681 SF will be parking; and 26,439 SF will be building. The water quality swale is located adjacent to the proposed parking lot. The bottom width will be 4 feet, side slopes will be 4:1 in the treatment area. The minimum length of the water quality swale will be 83 linear feet. Total residence time will meet the 9-minute minimum as required by CWS. Depth of water in the swale during a water quality event will be 0.25 feet. The 25- year storm event will be conveyed in the swale at a depth of 0.80 feet. WATER QUANTITY Subject to the City of Tigard's request, the proposed project will provide stormwater detention for the 2-year through the 25-year storm events. Two 5-foot diameter private stormwater detention pipes are proposed. The following table summarizes the proposed detention: Event Pre-development Peak Post-development Peak Detention Volume 2 yr 0.6 cfs 1.5 cfs 2470 CF 5 yr 1.0 cfs 2.1 cfs 3587 CF 10 yr 1.3 cfs 2.4 cfs 4300 CF 25 yr 1.7 cfs 2.9 cfs 5039 CF CESNW, Inc. 0 0 CES Memorandum Page 2 SITE MAP CT \ ~ S ' SW AIBERTAA ST iz5oo F i ° WATKINS pt . Q OMMER ~ n► r P ~ a. t AMFS RD 0F. 12100 via r+ SW MARION ST ~ coat' ~ sT .x o' 2 FAIRtM sw "FAtAt~F11 n' Sa i ~wi. _ <.a ~Fa'awuvv nuurt~ ~A mt !W s500 a 4 tr R ti ~5l1 L4 I S~ LLVIEII ST H ; ocE 3 _ 'i w i v q i a Sw o~ in SW GAA »aoo c MCDONALp, 9700 - 0R4 Q a rSi KFARf RM r Sy ,.r ..1i1'' M0111fYA H ha su.w " 91 B ~,HR7C171'"G'P/' .SN IREZ ST K'/EIM g rwx~~ a A l qw Ruz , as . hSG1 NTAIN 1~>00 " ~ , sw t ar c U C~ ~ "fiq l s . ► SII Mrs ST ~ ~ " 3 ,10900? lcooo, rtlu a~ ~ f ] S~ 6LV1 LT 9f TnAi L ~F . 9w LF LIE . , z, - CESNW, Inc. CESINW Preliminary Water Quality Calculations Project: Tigard Baptist Church Date: 2/14/05 Impervious areas: Parking and Sidewalks = 59681 sf 1 Building = 26439 sf 86120 sf total Required Water Quality Storage: Impervious Area' 0.03'= Required Storage Storage (co = 2583.6 WQ flow Water Quality Flow (cfs) = Water Quality Volume 14,400 sec. WQF = 0.18 cfs 0 0 CESINW POND STORAGE ROUTING Pipe Data: Dia. = 5 feet Radius = 2.5 feet Length = 135 feet Slope = 0.005 feet/feet Max Vol = 5301 Cubic Feet Height 0= 100 Elevation # Barrels= 2 MAX STOR. = 5039 cu ft MAX OUTLET = 1.7 cfs MAX HEIGHT = 4.9 feet 3.5 3.0 2.5 T 2.0 U _c 3 0 LL 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Project: Tigard Baptist Church Project Number. 1845 Date: 2111105 Basin: Site Event. 2 through 25 Outlet Data: Orifl A = 0.07 sq. ft. Broad Crested Orif1 E = 0 - Weir1 L = 2.78 feet Dial = 3.58 inches Weir1 E = 4.9 Orif2 A = 0.07 sq. ft. Rectangular Orif2 E = 2.7 Weir2 L = 0 feet Dia 2 = 3.58 inches Weir2 E = 0 Orif3 A = 0.08 sq. ft. Orif3 E = 4.1 Dia 3 = 3.83 inches Pipe Outflow Hydrograph 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Time in Minutes -Routed Hydrograph -Inflow Hydrograph 1400 1600 File: PIPEYLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 1 N TI r N ~ O cpi, m X U) 0 m cn Cz G 7 A V V V 1 W W W W W W W W U 1 N U 1 (7 fT (n N U i f J A A A A A A A A A W W W W W W W W W N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A W N S V (O W V Of N A W N W O W V W (n A W tJ ~ N (p Q1 V W N A W N ~ A fD W V 0 N A W N S W (p CD V fn (JI A W N~ N (p Q[1 V (n N A W N W ~ O 0 ~1 [n N A W N N W (n (n N (n Cn (J1 W N N N (n (JI U1 Cn to (n (n (n V f [n j N W A A A A A A A A j A W W W W W W j W N N N N N N N W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W N N N O O O W V W N A W N O O V (n N W N O W V W A W N O tO W O N A W 8 O W W V W N A W N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0( D V A V W W N C n W 0 D to w A T 0 a S o p p N t p p ~ p p~ ~ O O~ W O O 1 W O V N N O 6' B O N A W W A t [ T t p N T O t T N W N A-+ W N V V A O A O(Tp A W p)A V A-+(p pp pp tp W pp p~p~tp W N t0 V V V O to Co (O~ N O W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W N 0 0 U fnN W (n tnN W NNCnN W NN W NNNNCn (n W CnN NNON N(JINNNNNCnNN 00 tn(n(n N(n(n 0 n to(nN to tnU, 00 to N Cn to CA to tnCA (n CA (A 00 0 0 0 0 O O O O Ka rl) fl) O O O O O O rl) Pi N) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O t D t 0 (D t D W W W V V W W W (1 t Cn A A W W N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 V V O t n N (n t o A A W W N N N - O O O O W W~ W~ W W N N Cn (n N to N O1 N A A A A A A A A A A W W W W W W W W W W N N N N N N N N N N ~ X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V O) in d W N O (O QD V W (n W N+ O tD W V W to A (a N C O tO W V W (n A W IV ~ p (D 0 v m 'rn la W N ~ O (D W V (n N 's. W N+ O cD OD V 01 (n A W N ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D co co V V O O O N O A A W W N N N 0 0 (D t O t D f 0 W m~ V V V W (n (J 16, n A A W W N N B O O - + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -~~-~~~-•»ooooo0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000(0 (O (D (p (D (D (D (D W(O 000 W 00 W 00 W W W W W 0 V vv V V v V V v V(n 000 m 0 O) 000 m 00(A 00 is A A is A A(a W W w NNN-0 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 O)W 0 W W 0m V v V V v V V V V V Q) O) 00/ M 00 M (n 0 (n 00 o (n "A A A A A A W W W W NN N-+C 000000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 (D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D' o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 99 O O O O O O O p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 bD6V1-4 ~-4 -4 VV ~-1 ~-4 b) 6 c) b) 60 M N U6 L, Na Aa W W W N)K)-+0000CD 000CD 00CD 00CD 0CD 0000000000000000000CD 00000 W (D V (n W O W W N W N W N N N Npli N (O W V W A W N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 N A W OD W 0 W W A O W W O O (D (O A V W O O O O C O O O O O C O O G O O C O O O O O O G O O O O O O O O O O O O O O G O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O O C O O O O O C O O O O C G O O O O O O O O O O O C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W W OD W OD OD W O]OD W OD OD QI W W W W pD W Op ODN OD ODm~OD W 74:14:14:14 V W 0(ntn(n(n fn 01(n A A A A W W W W NNNN N~~ 000000000000 W O[r W 0 W W 0 W O) W W W m 0 OD W O) do W Ol V V 0 0 N A W O W W CA W (p V (n W+ ((On V A N O Oo 0) W (D V A W N O W W A fJ O W 0 A N c0 W W N A W N 0 0 0 0 V V V V V V V- V V V V- V V V V V V V V V V V V W W W (n W N A A A W W W N N-- 0 0 0 CO W M W V V W W W LP 0 A A A W W N N N ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V 0) 0) (n A N O CO N" O CD W (D Cn N W A O W N W W to d 0 W V N W 4"D N O OI N Ol d O W N co <n W W N O W (n w N O O O Cn j A A A A A W W W W W W N N N N N N N -N ~ O OO(D POD V V V (n W (n (nA AA W W N N N ~ X0000000 W O Cn W O W W N W N O O W W NA W N O- V O W W V V V W W W N O .Ch. A P!,)!%) N~ N N W A (P V CO N W O W V W 0 W 0 V 6'-D- d. A (n V O N N W 0 N 6A (D A 0 W V N W W C D41 O A O A W A 0 N O W+ V W 6:t- 0 W W (0 (n N 0 6 W m 6A W N O W W W NNNNNN - (p O)Ot (n A A W NNE N W O V O I A Now ~ 1 W A W ~ O 7' '71 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N W W V co CD W (n 6N W W N W 6IN 000(D ON W -+v V.-4 W 0Na w NN+-~A - 000 W(D W W v M 0 M 0 T 0 N W NU 0Cn(n A A A A A A (J W W W NK)N+0 Z O Cl) O d (Q m n v C y C 0 C ti r m y Q 3 4 y O Q~ CO C N C 0 11 • 0 Y) C7 'O LU O N N NT F3 o -u cn m X r N n m z 3 A W PP PP PP PP OP P PPP P O D O D O D V v V V V Oww V 0 M.DI W W W V W V MM( W N-O(00) V C)V1 (Am N M o Mtn 0 (T 0 0 0 (n N 0 M 00 M to "CA 0 (l~ N N O O ~ O ~ O O O O~ ~ O O O ~ ~ O H O W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W NNN CT V•N NEn N VIN (no N(n N6 66 NNM NN CT M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CO cD ~0 ~O OD 0) OD OD OD D) OD OD 0) OD V V V V V V V V V V D) OI W N+O(D OD V Q)Cn A W N~OtO OD V ~Cn A W N~Otp co K) K) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N NA7 - ~ X 000000 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O O co 0 m 0 0 0 co w w m (0 (0 ( 0 0 0 co 0 ~..•~~-~.-•~~.-•00000000000000000 000000000(0(om(0(om(o(0i0(cmaummmoDm 0I W OV,(On N.(VO V. OT A. ( W0 V ANO V (An W. V N N 0 V O W O O Ja aD IV V O. W A 0 0) W O V (n W N 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O Ot0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OD OD W OD O m OD O W OD CO m OD OD GD O) DD N W OD OD O OD O) O) OD 0D 60O OD 0OD W wwm w w wm 6D NO6 aD W wN W ww . V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V -I V V V V V V L-1 V V V V V V L-4 V V L4 V V V V V V ~1 V paV~ ~I V V V V V O A-f+OODN W SN(n N(O V N D(V V.VVi N OODN Wq (0 ~ W NODOA V''OO W OA (O (n NCO in N(O V NA W N (O 0I W 8R M!05D V aN(00 V . !Qp74( Wn NOOPP W.(W0v f.D AQ7 OD-+A V OAW"V N V WOD A -+W (n W 00 V 0) 0 'D d O fD W el T W O ~ O ~ v, m X 0 m N CZ 7 n V V V V V _V V O) TOtA 0M Of N rr N(n NN~O~ AO V A A AA W NSA W W V TNA W N+W N NNNNNNNNN N O 00000000000 000 0 0 0 00000000 OOOOO pp ((pp 0D OO OD V O N A W Np0 V <T Vt A W N pp (D qD V ut A W N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O + N N N -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O~ to Of O Of Of ~ O 01 V:-4 CA !b W lP O V~V V W !7D W O !J W CDf IV ip CA W H O W W V CA ~ Cn N tr Cn A? A A a W W W W W W W IJ N fJ IV N N (J IV N ~ ~ ~ O O O C C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ N N N ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C71 C11T C7) W TO)O1 tAM W V v W W W W W-1 V V W W W ON W W N(D 60- 0W W V 0 W 0(A 0 CA b- AAA A W W W W W W W Npa NN NNNNN ---00000 W OD tD W m OD W O O tD O tD tD 0 0 0 0 N N W A Z. VI M W PA O V W N A W W N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W V T V W V W V tD W O m 0 IV N W N ~1 IJ W VI N 0 Of W V W O Cn W N NA V N bD W W 6:-4 N W N O (D V W C71 N A L W W IV IJ IJ - O+ 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0* 0 to 0 0 0 t D 0 0 0 0- - + N N N W W A VIN O V m t D O( D O f N f D V O V t A A W W W N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O OtD000tDO NL. CA O<JN V 0 W -lN V W OtIDm VA W V O +00 W IV W!T++ W CA NC W 1Cll Ca 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q fJ 0009 W V J V O M0 W 04-4. W Af NNN 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0+ ~ + ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W WOf V CnW W V V V W W W W (D(p(p000 NW N V ~1 VN(DT(nCA 0CA MALAAAi a WWW W W W W W W INNIVIVIVNNNNN -+N NO ON000OOO (O t D D (O t D O c O t O t p t p (p 0 0 0 0 N N W WA C n t A V V D 1 V (n - O] M V t A A. W W W N N N+ - p p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AA W Nia A W NA W W.+ta W W ~a V N V NtDW A(J-(D Cn tD~ 6:'J tO N6 W O V 1s ~(D V 6:N NOCDO W V V 0Cn VI(nA A W W W W NNN W -(J ON-0000 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N W~ W W W A A A A A N VI A W N ~ U1 (OW~ T V1 O tT (T O O j V N tD (O O N W A p~ OD O MA M M O ( 0 N N W 0 W 0 W V M 0 VIA A W W N N- V1 a N N V V (OD W W W W OWf A (WO (W71 N A m V t W V WW W MO O N m N 0N WN V toO V1V VI V 'N p N0 W0) WVI WV NO VI O V W W N tD V OI V VI A W A W N N (D A W ®0 O1 O)O W tD00)O tDO NNNNOO V 0 W W A (O N Ja Cn N (J W+ N O V W IV Cu ~l tD V V (r N CA W O E A7 O) W W A CA IV A O C A W W V IV N V b U) 0WOMV2V(DOW N A (0 V V N W O N W tT W IJ V 0 0 0 Cn O O W W N O y 3 lD r N W y r H _ O d O J O N N y O n m • d O A Q S c.n m VI VI0 T 00 VI0 i- A A A A AAA A_A W W W W W Aw w(ii w m N N N N N N NNN+ J ~00000R0000 W 0 W (D t0 0 W (D (0 0 W W W W W W W W W V V V W N W N) pp (D W V W N A W N O (O W V W VI W N O (D W V W VIA W N O ~(pp W V N A W N O (D W V W VI W N) OO COW V W VIA W M W W -480 O W N O (D W V x 000 0 00 0 0 O O 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 00 0 O 0 0 O co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O C O O O O O A d? to d A A. la A A d A A A A to A A d A A A A A la A A A? A A A A A A. A A A A A A a A A (T N V1 N VI (P (.A N VI N V1 CT VI V, 0 0 Vt Vt 0 VI N G 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O OOCOOOCOOOOOOA A. d A A AA? ta? A A Ala AAA? AA AA i+d A. aA. A AAA la AAAAA Ja? A A A A A N(.n Ut CJt fJl Ut NN (11 (n (.1IN NtT Ut m 0 Ut N 0 CA 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N W W W W W W W A A A A N U I N V I C n u t U t O) T W W W W V V V V V V V V W W W W W O O O O O C O 0 0 0 A O W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N W W A A. VI 0 V W W O ~ Iv A N V to W U Co O N A, (n W V (D O IV W m V (D O N A 0 W W w~ N A Ln V • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N W W W W W W W W W W W W W A A A A A A V I V 1 N V I W W W W W W W V V V -:-4 W W W W W W W W( D( 0( D( D( D C O O O O O G O 0 0 is O W A W N W m W W Cp C i f W W W 6W 6 (D iO 0 j0 w 0 0- N N W A A 66:.4w O- W VI V W- w o w O w A W W W W- W A M W O N W A Ut V W w- N A W W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O O C O O C O+ t4J W A A A A A A A 3a A? A A A A A A if AAA A A A A 4.p. A A l+. A A A? CT N fif (.11 C)1 W U1 CT N (JI N N N (J1 N (J1 (J1 (i1 VI m (p m W W ()f W /n Uf W /A 01 m (n (p V n m (p a O O O O O O O O O O P.- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N!'3 N N N N N N N N f O w w w( J w w W A A A A A U 1 V 1 U t U t U t W W W W W O f p V V V V V V V W W W W W W (D ( D Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- W W O A A A A A A A A A A A W (T O N Cif 0 CT M CA V V V 6 W (O O W N W A V V W O N A W W O W (T V (0 O- ?,J A V V W ~ W .P. 0f V W (O ~ N W (T W W O~ 7 n _ _ _ N N K3 m to N N N N N N N N N N A W Df W W Of Of W W W 01 W W W W W W W W W 0f W W W V V V V W W W W (D tp O_ O J N N W A Ut N W W Q) V V W (D O O OA V OK OA N W W j A( Ln 00 W OO.C OW CD W N V (D NA V O W+N(NO dpWD W V V W p WA O (Oil vN p co tN App~f //JJ pppp NwOWOwV C(O A W(n O(T OA W N W CnO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D W W W A W OD N N O W ut (O O W N Ut W W N (O (O W A+ (p V W N W Ut W W O CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O W W W U CO 0 p WV W W.0- V V VI A (if W N CD W W V W V W O A. O W w O w W V N W N VI O W W T O W W W W W w A. O (O W A W D. to w 0 W N O W H O V A W m • d O N N a • 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000ooO0O000 00000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 U C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ? O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 O O O O 00 O O o 00 C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O O O O O O O O O C J O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) {lJ U 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0000000000ooooocooooo0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ooooocoo 00000000000000o000000a000a000oa0000a00000a0000000000000O00ooo0000000000000000 ooO0 0000000000000000000000000o0oooc0ooooocooooo00000000000000000000000000000000000000 • 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000oa0ooCD 0000a0oo000000000000odd 000060coo 000a0000a00000000Q000a0000000000000000 O0 O0000000a0000a0000o0o00000000000000000000000a0000000000000000000000000000000000 0ooooocooooo000000000000ooooocooo0o0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000O0 OO0 000oo0oooooO0 O9 0 0 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOo 00000000000000000000000ooooocooooo00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000po000pp0000000000000000000000000p000000000pp000 ppo to oooooo x Nm0 N Mp NOr NOOn NMO0 to h m0pp NM to p7mO NMON Mom NM4 N 0N O~NM vOm~lbmO (V R Ntoh ~O NM n o M C4, ~Nto (D [o [o to Ofom(OOn~n n n h I~aO aD ~m d O to 2- m 0mmmm tommmm00 N 0 N 0 N0 N 0 N 000 M to NN NNNNNNNMM o MM MM O m NNNN "m ~ ~.-NNNNN NN NNNNNNNNNNN NN NNNNN N N N N O EL N ~a 2390 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2400 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2410 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2420 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2430 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2440 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2450 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2460 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2470 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2480 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2490 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2500 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2510 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2520 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2530 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2540 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2550 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2560 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2570 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2580 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2590 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2600 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2610 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2620 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2630 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2640 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2650 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2660 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2670 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2680 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2690 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2700 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2710 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2720 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2730 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2740 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2750 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2760 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2770 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2780 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2790 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2800 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2810 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2820 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2830 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2840 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2850 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2860 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2870 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2880 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 • File: PIPE.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 7 • CES INW SANTA BARBARA URBAN HYDROGRAPH SCS TYPE 1A 24-HOUR DISTRIBUTION Given: Area = 4.64 acres Pt = 2.5 inches dt = 10 min. Tc = 23 min. W = 0.1786 routing constant Pervio us Area Impervious Area Area = 4.64 acres Area = 0 acres CN = 79 CN = 98 S = 2.66 S = 0.20 0.2S = 0.53 0.2S = 0.04 • Project: Tigard Baptist Church Project Number. 1845 Date: 2/11/05 Basin: Site Event: 2-year pre HYDROGRAPH RESULTS Peak Runoff: 0.6 cfs Total Vol.: 13847 cf Peak Runoff Hydrograph 0.6 0.5 0.4 U 0.3 3 0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Time in Minutes 1200 1400 1600 File: SBUH-24-pre2ALS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 1 • • Pervious Area Impervious Area (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated lated mental lated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydro- merit bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (CIS) (cfs) 1 10 0.0040 0.0100 0.0100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 2 20 0.0040 0.0100 0.0200 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 3 30 0.0040 0.0100 0.0300 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 4 40 0.0040 0.0100 0.0400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 5 50 0.0040 0.0100 0.0500 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.0004 0.0000 0.0 0.0 6 60 0.0040 0.0100 0.0600 0.0000 0.0000 0.0016 _ 0.0013 0.0000 0.0 0.0 7 70 0.0040 0.0100 0.0700 0.0000 0.0000 0.0037 0.0020 0.0000 0.0 0.0 8 80 0.0040 0.0100 0.0800 0.0000 0.0000 0.0063 0.0027 0.0000 0.0 0.0 9 90 0.0040 0.0100 0.0900 0.0000 0.0000 0.0096 0.0032 0.0000 0.0 0.0 10 100 0.0040 0.0100 0.1000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0133 0.0038 0.0000 0.0 0.0 11 110 0.0050 0.0125 0.1.125 0.0000 0.0000 0.0186 0.0053 0.0000 0.0 0.0 12 120 0.0050 0.0125 0.1250 0.0000 0.0000 0.0246 0.0060 0.0000 0.0 0.0 13 130 0.0050 0.0125 0.1375 0.0000 0.0000 0.0311 0.0065 0.0000 0.0 0.0 14 140 0.0050 0.0125 0.1500 0.0000 0.0000 0.0381 0.0070 0.0000 0.0 0.0 15 150 0.0050 0.0125 0.1625 0.0000 0.0000 0.0455 0.0074 0.0000 0.0 0.0 16 160 0.0050 0.0125 0.1750 0.0000 0.0000 0.0532 0.0078 0.0000 0.0 0.0 17 170 0.0060 0.0150 0.1900 0.0000 0.0000 0.0630 0.0098 0.0000 0.0 0.0 18 180 0.0060 0.0150 0.2050 0.0000 0.0000 0.0732 0.0102 0.0000 0.0 0.0 19 190 0.0060 0.0150 0.2200 0.0000 0.0000 0.0838 0.0106 0.0000 0.0 0.0 20 200 0.0060 0.0150 0.2350 0.0000 0.0000 0.0947 0.0109 0.0000 0.0 0.0 21 210 0.0060 0.0150 0.2500 0.0000 0.0000 0.1059 0.0112 0.0000 0.0 0.0 22 220 0.0060 0.0150 0.2650 0.0000 0.0000 0.1174 0.0115 0.0000 0.0 0.0 23 230 0.0070 0.0175 0.2825 0.0000 0.0000 0.1310 0.0137 0.0000 0.0 0.0 24 240 0.0070 0.0175 0.3000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1450 0.0140 0.0000 0.0 0.0 25 250 0.0070 0.0175 0.3175 0.0000 0.0000 0.1592 0.0142 0.0000 0.0 0.0 26 260 0.0070 0.0175 0.3350 0.0000 0.0000 0.1737 0.0145 0.0000 0.0 0.0 27 270 0.0070 0.0175 0.3525 0.0000 0.0000 0.1884 0.0147 0.0000 0.0 0.0 28 280 0.0070 0.0175 0.3700 0.0000 0.0000 0.2032 0.0148 0.0000 0.0 0.0 29 290 0.0082 0.0205 0.3905 0.0000 0.0000 0.2208 0.0176 0.0000 0.0 0.0 30 300 0.0082 0.0205 0.4110 0.0000 0.0000 0.2386 0.0178 0.0000 0.0 0.0 31 310 0.0082 0.0205 0.4315 0.0000 0.0000 0.2566 0.0180 0.0000 0.0 0.0 32 320 0.0082 0.0205 0.4520 0.0000 0.0000 0.2748 0.0182 0.0000 0.0 0.0 33 330 0.0082 0.0205 0.4725 0.0000 0.0000 0.2931 0.0183 0.0000 0.0 0.0 34 340 0.0082 0.0205 0.4930 0.0000 0.0000 0.3116 0.0185 0.0000 0.0 0.0 35 350 0.0095 0.0238 0.5168 0.0000 0.0000 0.3331 0.0215 0.0000 0.0 0.0 36 360 0.0095 0.0238 0.5405 0.0000 0.0000 0.3548 0.0217 0.0000 0.0 0.0 37 370 0.0095 0.0238 0.5643 0.0004 0.0004 0.3766 0.0218 0.0004 0.0 0.0 38 380 0.0095 0.0238 0.5880 0.0012 0.0008 0.3985 0.0219 0.0008 0.0 0.0 39 390 0.0095 0.0238 0.6118 0.0023 0.0012 0.4206 0.0221 0.0012 0.0 0.0 40 400 0.0095 0.0238 0.6355 0.0039 0.0016 0.4427 0.0222 0.0016 0.0 0.0 41 410 0.0134 0.0335 0.6690 0.0067 0.0028 0.4741 0.0314 0.0028 0.1 0.0 42 420 0.0134 0.0335 0.7025 0.0103 0.0036 0.5057 0.0316 0.0036 0.1 0.1 43 430 0.0134 0.0335 0.7360 0.0146 0.0043 0.5374 0.0317 0.0043 0.1 0.1 44 440 0.0180 0.0450 0.7810 0.0214 0.0068 0.5802 0.0428 0.0068 0.2 0.1 45 450 0.0180 0.0450 0.8260 0.0293 0.0080 0.6232 0.0430 0.0080 0.2 0.1 46 460 0.0340 0.0850 0.9110 0.0474 0.0180 0.7049 0.0817 0.0180 0.5 0.2 47 470 0.0540 0.1350 1.0460 0.0834 0.0360 0.8355 0.1307 0.0360 1.0 0.4 48 480 0.0270 0.0675 1.1135 0.1045 0.0211 0.9012 0.0657 0.0211 0.6 0.6 49 490 0.0180 0.0450 1.1585 0.1196 0.0151 0.9451 0.0439 0.0151 0.4 0.5 50 500 0.0134 0.0335 1.1920 0.1314 0.0118 0.9778 0.0327 0.0118 0.3 0.5 51 510 0.0134 0.0335 1.2255 0.1436 0.0122 1.0106 0.0328 0.0122 0.3 0.4 52 520 0.0134 0.0335 1.2590 0.1563 0.0126 1.0434 0.0328 0.0126 0.4 0.4 53 530 0.0088 0.0220 1.2810 0.1648 0.0085 1.0649 0.0216 0.0085 0.2 0.4 54 540 0.0088 0.0220 1.3030 0.1735 0.0087 1.0865 0.0216 0.0087 0.2 0.3 55 550 0.0088 0.0220 1.3250 0.1824 0.0089 1.1081 0.0216 0.0089 0.2 0.3 56 560 0.0088 0.0220 1.3470 0.1914 0.0090 1.1297 0.0216 0.0090 0.3 0.3 57 570 0.0088 0.0220 1.3690 0.2006 0.0092 1.1513 0.0216 0.0092 0.3 0.3 58 580 0.0088 0.0220 1.3910 0.2099 0.0094 1.1729 0.0216 0.0094 0.3 0.3 59 590 0.0088 0.0220 1.4130 0.2195 0.0095 1.1945 0.0216 0.0095 0.3 0.3 60 600 0.0088 0.0220 1.4350 0.2291 0.0097 1.2162 0.0216 0.0097 0.3 0.3 61 610 0.0088 0.0220 1.4570 0.2389 0.0098 1.2378 0.0216 0.0098 0.3 0.3 62 620 0.0088 0.0220 1.4790 0.2489 0.0100 1.2595 0.0217 0.0100 0.3 0.3 63 630 0.0088 0.0220 1.5010 0.2590 0.0101 1.2811 0.0217 0.0101 0.3 0.3 64 640 0.0088 0.0220 1.5230 0.2693 0.0103 1.3028 0.0217 0.0103 0.3 0.3 65 650 0.0072 0.0180 1.5410 0.2778 0.0085 1.3205 0.0177 0.0085 0.2 0.3 66 660 0.0072 0.0180 1.5590 0.2864 0.0086 1.3383 0.0177 0.0086 0.2 0.3 67 670 0.0072 0.0180 1.5770 0.2951 0.0087 1.3560 0.0177 0.0087 0.2 0.3 68 680 0.0072 0.0180 1.5950 0.3038 0.0088 1.3738 0.0178 0.0088 0.2 0.3 69 690 0.0072 0.0180 1.6130 0.3127 0.0089 1.3915 0.0178 0.0089 0.2 0.2 70 700 0.0072 0.0180 1.6310 0.3216 0.0089 1.4093 0.0178 0.0089 0.3 0.2 71 710 0.0072 0.0180 1.6490 0.3307 0.0090 1.4271 0.0178 0.0090 0.3 0.3 File: SBUH-24-pre2.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 2 • • (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated lated mental lated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydro- ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (cfs) (cfs) 72 720 0.0072 0.0180 1.6670 0.3398 0.0091 1.4449 0.0178 0.0091 0.3 0.3 73 730 0.0072 0.0180 1.6850 0.3490 0.0092 1.4626 0.0178 0.0092 0.3 0.3 74 740 0.0072 0.0180 1.7030 0.3583 0.0093 1.4804 0.0178 0.0093 0.3 0.3 75 750 0.0072 0.0180 1.7210 0.3677 0.0094 1.4982 0.0178 0.0094 0.3 0.3 76 760 0.0072 0.0180 1.7390 0.3771 0.0094 1.5160 0.0178 0.0094 0.3 0.3 77 770 0.0057 0.0143 1.7533 0.3846 0.0075 1.5301 0.0141 0.0075 0.2 0.3 78 780 0.0057 0.0143 1.7675 0.3922 0.0076 1.5442 0.0141 0.0076 0.2 0.2 79 790 0.0057 0.0143 1.7818 0.3999 0.0076 1.5583 0.0141 0.0076 0.2 0.2 80 800 0.0057 0.0143 1.7960 0.4075 0.0077 1.5724 0.0141 0.0077 0.2 0.2 81 810 0.0057 0.0143 1.8103 0.4153 0.0077 1.5865 0.0141 0.0077 0.2 0.2 82 820 0.0057 0.0143 1.8245 0.4230 0.0078 1.6006 0.0141 0.0078 0.2 0.2 83 830 0.0057 0.0143 1.8388 0.4309 0.0078 1.6147 0.0141 0.0078 0.2 0.2 84 840 0.0057 0.0143 1.8530 0.4387 0.0079 1.6288 0.0141 0.0079 0.2 0.2 85 850 0.0057 0.0143 1.8673 0.4466 0.0079 1.6429 0.0141 0.0079 0.2 0.2 86 860 0.0057 0.0143 1.8815 0.4546 0.0080 1.6570 0.0141 0.0080 0.2 0.2 87 870 0.0057 0.0143 1.8958 0.4626 0.0080 1.6711 0.0141 0.0080 0.2 0.2 88 880 0.0057 0.0143 1.9100 0.4707 0.0080 1.6852 0.0141 0.0080 0.2 0.2 89 890 0.0050 0.0125 1.9225 0.4778 0.0071 1.6976 0.0124 0.0071 0.2 0.2 90 900 0.0050 0.0125 1.9350 0.4849 0.0071 1.7100 0.0124 0.0071 0.2 0.2 91 910 0.0050 0.0125 1.9475 0.4920 0.0072 1.7223 0.0124 0.0072 0.2 0.2 92 920 0.0050 0.0125 1.9600 0.4992 0.0072 1.7347 0.0124 0.0072 0.2 0.2 93 930 0.0050 0.0125 1.9725 0.5065 0.0072 1.7471 0.0124 0.0072 0.2 0.2 94 940 0.0050 0.0125 1.9850 0.5137 0.0073 1.7595 0.0124 0.0073 0.2 0.2 95 950 0.0050 0.0125 1.9975 0.5210 0.0073 1.7719 0.0124 0.0073 0.2 0.2 96 960 0.0050 0.0125 2.0100 0.5283 0.0073 1.7843 0.0124 0.0073 0.2 0.2 97 970 0.0050 0.0125 2.0225 0.5357 0.0074 1.7967 0.0124 0.0074 0.2 0.2 98 980 0.0050 0.0125 2.0350 0.5431 0.0074 1.8090 0.0124 0.0074 0.2 0.2 99 990 0.0050 0.0125 2.0475 0.5505 0.0074 1.8214 0.0124 0.0074 0.2 0.2 100 1000 0.0050 0.0125 2.0600 0.5579 0.0074 1.8338 0.0124 0.0074 0.2 0.2 101 1010 0.0040 0.0100 2.0700 0.5639 0.0060 1.8438 0.0099 0.0060 0.2 0.2 102 1020 0.0040 0.0100 2.0800 0.5699 0.0060 1.8537 0.0099 0.0060 0.2 0.2 103 1030 0.0040 0.0100 2.0900 0.5759 0.0060 1.8636 0.0099 0.0060 0.2 0.2 104 1040 0.0040 0.0100 2.1000 0.5820 0.0060 1.8735 0.0099 0.0060 0.2 0.2 105 1050 0.0040 0.0100 2.1100 0.5880 0.0061 1.8834 0.0099 0.0061 0.2 0.2 106 1060 0.0040 0.0100 2.1200 0.5941 0.0061 1.8933 0.0099 0.0061 0.2 0.2 107 1070 0.0040 0.0100 2.1300 0.6002 0.0061 1.9033 0.0099 0.0061 0.2 0.2 108 1080 0.0040 0.0100 2.1400 0.6063 0.0061 1.9132 0.0099 0.0061 0.2 0.2 109 1090 0.0040 0.0100 2.1500 0.6124 0.0061 1.9231 0.0099 0.0061 0.2 0.2 110 1100 0.0040 0.0100 2.1600 0.6186 0.0061 1.9330 0.0099 0.0061 0.2 0.2 111 1110 0.0040 0.0100 2.1700 0.6247 0.0062 1.9430 0.0099 0.0062 0.2 0.2 112 1120 0.0040 0.0100 2.1800 0.6309 0.0062 1.9529 0.0099 0.0062 0.2 0.2 113 1130 0.0040 0.0100 2.1900 0.6371 0.0062 1.9628 0.0099 0.0062 0.2 0.2 114 1140 0.0040 0.0100 2.2000 0.6433 0.0062 1.9727 0.0099 0.0062 0.2 0.2 115 1150 0.0040 0.0100 2.2100 0.6496 0.0062 1.9827 0.0099 0.0062 0.2 0.2 116 1160 0.0040 0.0100 2.2200 0.6558 0.0063 1.9926 0.0099 0.0063 0.2 0.2 117 1170 0.0040 0.0100 2.2300 0.6621 0.0063 2.0025 0.0099 0.0063 0.2 0.2 118 1180 0.0040 0.0100 2.2400 0.6684 0.0063 2.0124 0.0099 0.0063 0.2 0.2 119 1190 0.0040 0.0100 2.2500 0.6747 0.0063 2.0224 0.0099 0.0063 0.2 0.2 120 1200 0.0040 0.0100 2.2600 0.6810 0.0063 2.0323 0.0099 0.0063 0.2 0.2 121 1210 0.0040 0.0100 2.2700 0.6873 0.0063 2.0422 0.0099 0.0063 0.2 0.2 122 1220 0.0040 0.0100 2.2800 0.6937 0.0064 2.0521 0.0099 0.0064 0.2 0.2 123 1230 0.0040 0.0100 2.2900 0.7000 0.0064 2.0621 0.0099 0.0064 0.2 0.2 124 1240 0.0040 0.0100 2.3000 0.7064 0.0064 2.0720 0.0099 0.0064 0.2 0.2 125 1250 0.0040 0.0100 2.3100 0.7128 0.0064 2.0819 0.0099 0.0064 0.2 0.2 126 1260 0.0040 0.0100 2.3200 0.7193 0.0064 2.0919 0.0099 0.0064 0.2 0.2 127 1270 0.0040 0.0100 2.3300 0.7257 0.0064 2.1018 0.0099 0.0064 0.2 0.2 128 1280 0.0040 0.0100 2.3400 0.7321 0.0065 2.1117 0.0099 0.0065 0.2 0.2 129 1290 0.0040 0.0100 2.3500 0.7386 0.0065 2.1217 0.0099 0.0065 0.2 0.2 130 1300 0.0040 0.0100 2.3600 0.7451 0.0065 2.1316 0.0099 0.0065 0.2 0.2 131 1310 0.0040 0.0100 2.3700 0.7516 0.0065 2.1415 0.0099 0.0065 0.2 0.2 132 1320 0.0040 0.0100 2.3800 0.7581 0.0065 2.1515 0.0099 0.0065 0.2 0.2 133 1330 0.0040 0.0100 2.3900 0.7646 0.0065 2.1614 0.0099 0.0065 0.2 0.2 134 1340 0.0040 0.0100 2.4000 0.7712 0.0065 2.1714 0.0099 0.0065 0.2 0.2 135 1350 0.0040 0.0100 2.4100 0.7777 0.0066 2.1813 0.0099 0.0066 0.2 0.2 136 1360 0.0040 0.0100 2.4200 0.7843 0.0066 2.1912 0.0099 0.0066 0.2 0.2 137 1370 0.0040 0.0100 2.4300 0.7909 0.0066 2.2012 0.0099 0.0066 0.2 0.2 138 1380 0.0040 0.0100 2.4400 0.7975 0.0066 2.2111 0.0099 0.0066 0.2 0.2 139 1390 0.0040 0.0100 2.4500 0.8041 0.0066 2.2210 0.0099 0.0066 0.2 0.2 140 1400 0.0040 0.0100 2.4600 0.8107 0.0066 2.2310 0.0099 0.0066 0.2 0.2 141 1410 0.0040 0.0100 2.4700 0.8174 0.0066 2.2409 0.0099 0.0066 0.2 0.2 142 1420 0.0040 0.0100 2.4800 0.8241 0.0067 2.2509 0.0099 0.0067 0.2 0.2 143 1430 0.0040 0.0100 2.4900 0.8307 0.0067 2.2608 0.0099 0.0067 0.2 0.2 144 1440 0.0040 0.0100 2.5000 0.8374 0.0067 2.2707 0.0099 0.0067 0.2 0.2 Total 1.0000 2.5000 Hydrograph Volume 13847 (Cubic Feet) File: SBUH-24-pre2.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 3 • CESINW SANTA BARBARA URBAN HYDROGRAPH SCS TYPE 1A 24-HOUR DISTRIBUTION Given: Area = 4.64 acres 1.2 1.0 0.8 y U C 0.6 3 0 0.4 0.2 0.0 Pt = 3.1 inches dt = 10 min. Tc = 21 min. W = 0.1923 routing constant Pervious Area Impervious Area Area = 4.64 acres Area = 0 acres CN = 79 CN = 98 S = 2.66 S = 0.20 0.2S = 0.53 0.2S = 0.04 • Project: Tigard Baptist Church Project Number. 1845 Date: 2/11/05 Basin: Site Event. 5-year pre HYDROGRAPH RESULTS Peak Runoff: 1.0 cfs Total Vol.: 20934 cf Peak Runoff Hydrograph 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Time in Minutes 1200 1400 1600 File: SBUH-24-pre5ALS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 1 Pervious Area Impervious Area (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated lated mental lated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydro- ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (cfs) (cfs) 1 10 0.0040 0.0124 0.0124 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 2 20 0.0040 0.0124 0.0248 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 3 30 0.0040 0.0124 0.0372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 4 40 0.0040 0.0124 0.0496 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.0004 0.0000 0.0 0.0 5 50 0.0040 0.0124 0.0620 0.0000 0.0000 0.0020 0.0016 0.0000 0.0 0.0 6 60 0.0040 0.0124 0.0744 0.0000 0.0000 0.0047 0.0028 0.0000 0.0 0.0 7 70 0.0040 0.0124 0.0868 0.0000 0.0000 0.0085 0.0037 0.0000 0.0 0.0 8 80 0.0040 0.0124 0.0992 0.0000 0.0000 0.0130 0.0045 0.0000 0.0 0.0 9 90 0.0040 0.0124 0.1116 0.0000 0.0000 0.0182 0.0052 0.0000 0.0 0.0 10 100 0.0040 0.0124 0.1240 0.0000 0.0000 0.0241 0.0059 0.0000 0.0 0.0 11 110 0.0050 0.0155 0.1395 0.0000 0.0000 0.0322 0.0081 0.0000 0.0 0.0 12 120 0.0050 0.0155 0.1550 0.0000 0.0000 0.0410 0.0088 0.0000 0.0 0.0 13 130 0.0050 0.0155 0.1705 0.0000 0.0000 0.0504 0.0094 0.0000 0.0 0.0 14 140 0.0050 0.0155 0.1860 0.0000 0.0000 0.0604 0.0100 0.0000 0.0 0.0 15 150 0.0050 0.0155 0.2015 0.0000 0.0000 0.0708 0.0104 0.0000 0.0 0.0 16 160 0.0050 0.0155 0.2170 0.0000 0.0000 0.0816 0.0108 0.0000 0.0 0.0 17 170 0.0060 0.0186 0.2356 0.0000 0.0000 0.0951 0.0135 0.0000 0.0 0.0 18 180 0.0060 0.0186 0.2542 0.0000 0.0000 0.1091 0.0139 0.0000 0.0 0.0 19 190 0.0060 0.0186 0.2728 0.0000 0.0000 0.1234 0.0143 0.0000 0.0 0.0 20 200 0.0060 0.0186 0.2914 0.0000 0.0000 0.1381 0.0147 0.0000 0.0 0.0 21 210 0.0060 0.0186 0.3100 0.0000 0.0000 0.1531 0.0150 0.0000 0.0 0.0 22 220 0.0060 0.0186 0.3286 0.0000 0.0000 0.1684 0.0153 0.0000 0.0 0.0 23 230 0.0070 0.0217 0.3503 0.0000 0.0000 0.1865 0.0181 0.0000 0.0 0.0 24 240 0.0070 0.0217 0.3720 0.0000 0.0000 0.2049 0.0184 0.0000 0.0 0.0 25 250 0.0070 0.0217 0.3937 0.0000 0.0000 0.2236 0.0187 0.0000 0.0 0.0 26 260 0.0070 0.0217 0.4154 0.0000 0.0000 0.2425 0.0189 0.0000 0.0 0.0 27 270 0.0070 0.0217 0.4371 0.0000 0.0000 0.2616 0.0191 0.0000 0.0 0.0 28 280 0.0070 0.0217 0.4588 0.0000 0.0000 0.2809 0.0193 0.0000 0.0 0.0 29 290 0.0082 0.0254 0.4842 0.0000 0.0000 0.3036 0.0228 0.0000 0.0 0.0 30 300 0.0082 0.0254 0.5096 0.0000 0.0000 0.3266 0.0230 0.0000 0.0 0.0 31 310 0.0082 0.0254 0.5351 0.0000 0.0000 0.3498 0.0232 0.0000 0.0 0.0 32 320 0.0082 0.0254 0.5605 0.0003 0.0003 0.3731 0.0233 0.0003 0.0 0.0 33 330 0.0082 0.0254 0.5859 0.0011 0.0008 0.3966 0.0235 0.0008 0.0 0.0 34 340 0.0082 0.0254 0.6113 0.0023 0.0012 0.4202 0.0236 0.0012 0.0 0.0 35 350 0.0095 0.0295 0.6408 0.0043 0.0020 0.4477 0.0275 0.0020 0.1 0.0 36 360 0.0095 0.0295 0.6702 0.0069 0.0026 0.4753 0.0276 0.0026 0.1 0.0 37 370 0.0095 0.0295 0.6997 0.0100 0.0031 0.5030 0.0277 0.0031 0.1 0.1 38 380 0.0095 0.0295 0.7291 0.0137 0.0037 0.5309 0.0279 0.0037 0.1 0.1 39 390 0.0095 0.0295 0.7586 0.0178 0.0042 0.5589 0.0280 0.0042 0.1 0.1 40 400 0.0095 0.0295 0.7880 0.0226 0.0047 0.5869 0.0281 0.0047 0.1 0.1 41 410 0.0134 0.0415 0.8296 0.0300 0.0075 0.6266 0.0397 0.0075 0.2 0.1 42 420 0.0134 0.0415 0.8711 0.0384 0.0084 0.6665 0.0399 0.0084. 0.2 0.2 43 430 0.0134 0.0415 0.9126 0.0478 0.0093 0.7065 0.0400 0.0093 0.3 0.2 44 440 0.0180 0.0558 0.9684 0.0616 0.0139 0.7603 0.0539 0.0139 0.4 0.2 45 450 0.0180 0.0558 1.0242 0.0770 0.0154 0.8144 0.0541 0.0154 0.4 0.3 46 460 0.0340 0.1054 1.1296 0.1098 0.0328 0.9170 0.1025 0.0328 0.9 0.5 47 470 0.0540 0.1674 1.2970 0.1711 0.0613 1.0807 0.1637 0.0613 1.7 0.8 48 480 0.0270 0.0837 1.3807 0.2056 0.0344 1.1628 0.0822 0.0344 1.0 1.0 49 490 0.0180 0.0558 1.4365 0.2298 0.0242 1.2177 0.0549 0.0242 0.7 0.9 50 500 0.0134 0.0415 1.4781 0.2485 0.0187 1.2586 0.0409 0.0187 0.5 0.8 51 510 0.0134 0.0415 1.5196 0.2677 0.0192 1.2995 0.0409 0.0192 0.5 0.7 52 520 0.0134 0.0415 1.5612 0.2874 0.0197 1.3404 0.0409 0.0197 0.6 0.6 53 530 0.0088 0.0273 1.5884 0.3006 0.0132 1.3673 0.0269 0.0132 0.4 0.6 54 540 0.0088 0.0273 1.6157 0.3140 0.0134 1.3942 0.0269 0.0134 0.4 0.5 55 550 0.0088 0.0273 1.6430 0.3277 0.0136 1.4212 0.0269 0.0136 0.4 0.5 56 560 0.0088 0.0273 1.6703 0.3415 0.0138 1.4481 0.0269 0.0138 0.4 0.4 57 570 0.0088 0.0273 1.6976 0.3555 0.0140 1.4750 0.0269 0.0140 0.4 0.4 58 580 0.0088 0.0273 1.7248 0.3697 0.0142 1.5020 0.0270 0.0142 0.4 0.4 59 590 0.0088 0.0273 1.7521 0.3840 0.0144 1.5290 0.0270 0.0144 0.4 0.4 60 600 0.0088 0.0273 1.7794 0.3986 0.0146 1.5559 0.0270 0.0146 0.4 0.4 61 610 0.0088 0.0273 1.8067 0.4133 0.0147 1.5829 0.0270 0.0147 0.4 0.4 62 620 0.0088 0.0273 1.8340 0.4282 0.0149 1.6099 0.0270 0.0149 0.4 0.4 63 630 0.0088 0.0273 1.8612 0.4433 0.0151 1.6369 0.0270 0.0151 0.4 0.4 64 640 0.0088 0.0273 1.8885 0.4585 0.0152 1.6639 0.0270 0.0152 0.4 0.4 65 650 0.0072 0.0223 1.9108 0.4711 0.0126 1.6860 0.0221 0.0126 0.4 0.4 66 660 0.0072 0.0223 1.9332 0.4838 0.0127 1.7081 0.0221 0.0127 0.4 0.4 67 670 0.0072 0.0223 1.9555 0.4966 0.0128 1.7302 0.0221 0.0128 0.4 0.4 68 680 0.0072 0.0223 1.9778 0.5095 0.0129 1.7524 0.0221 0.0129 0.4 0.4 69 690 0.0072 0.0223 2.0001 0.5226 0.0130 1.7745 0.0221 0.0130 0.4 0.4 70 700 0.0072 0.0223 2.0224 0.5357 0.0131 1.7966 0.0221 0.0131 0.4 0.4 71 710 0.0072 0.0223 2.0448 0.5489 0.0132 1.8187 0.0221 0.0132 0.4 0.4 File: SBUH-24-pre5.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 2 • • (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated lated mental lated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydra ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (cfs) (cfs) 72 720 0.0072 0.0223 2.0671 0.5622 0.0133 1.8409 0.0221 0.0133 0.4 0.4 73 730 0.0072 0.0223 2.0894 0.5756 0.0134 1.8630 0.0221 0.0134 0.4 0.4 74 740 0.0072 0.0223 2.1117 0.5891 0.0135 1.8851 0.0221 0.0135 0.4 0.4 75 750 0.0072 0.0223 2.1340 0.6027 0.0136 1.9073 0.0221 0.0136 0.4 0.4 76 760 0.0072 0.0223 2.1564 0.6163 0.0137 1.9294 0.0221 0.0137 0.4 0.4 77 770 0.0057 0.0177 2.1740 0.6272 0.0109 1.9470 0.0175 0.0109 0.3 0.4 78 780 0.0057 0.0177 2.1917 0.6382 0.0109 1.9645 0.0175 0.0109 0.3 0.3 79 790 0.0057 0.0177 2.2094 0.6492 0.0110 1.9820 . 0.0175 0.0110 0.3 0.3 80 800 0.0057 0.0177 2.2270 0.6602 0.0111 1.9996 0.0175 0.0111 0.3 0.3 81 810 0.0057 0.0177 2.2447 0.6713 0.0111 2.0171 0.0175 0.0111 0.3 0.3 82 820 0.0057 0.0177 2.2624 0.6825 0.0112 2.0347 0.0175 0.0112 0.3 0.3 83 830 0.0057 0.0177 2.2801 0.6937 0.0112 2.0522 0.0175 0.0112 0.3 0.3 84 840 0.0057 0.0177 2.2977 0.7050 0.0113 2.0697 0.0175 0.0113 0.3 0.3 85 850 0.0057 0.0177 2.3154 0.7163 0.0113 2.0873 0.0175 0.0113 0.3 0.3 86 860 0.0057 0.0177 2.3331 0.7277 0.0114 2.1048 0.0176 0.0114 0.3 0.3 87 870 0.0057 0.0177 2.3507 0.7391 0.0114 2.1224 0.0176 0.0114 0.3 0.3 88 880 0.0057 0.0177 2.3684 0.7505 0.0115 2.1400 0.0176 0.0115 0.3 0.3 89 890 0.0050 0.0155 2.3839 0.7606 0.0101 2.1554 0.0154 0.0101 0.3 0.3 90 900 0.0050 0.0155 2.3994 0.7708 0.0101 2.1708 0.0154 0.0101 0.3 0.3 91 910 0.0050 0.0155 2.4149 0.7809 0.0102 2.1862 0.0154 0.0102 0.3 0.3 92 920 0.0050 0.0155 2.4304 0.7912 0.0102 2.2016 0.0154 0.0102 0.3 0.3 93 930 0.0050 0.0155 2.4459 0.8014 0.0102 2.2170 0.0154 0.0102 0.3 0.3 94 940 0.0050 0.0155 2.4614 0.8117 0.0103 2.2324 0.0154 0.0103 0.3 0.3 95 950 0.0050 0.0155 2.4769 0.8220 0.0103 2.2478 0.0154 0.0103 0.3 0.3 96 960 0.0050 0.0155 2.4924 0.8323 0.0103 2.2632 0.0154 0.0103 0.3 0.3 97 970 0.0050 0.0155 2.5079 0.8427 0.0104 2.2786 0.0154 0.0104 0.3 0.3 98 980 0.0050 0.0155 2.5234 0.8531 0.0104 2.2940 0.0154 0.0104 0.3 0.3 99 990 0.0050 0.0155 2.5389 0.8636 0.0105 2.3094 0.0154 0.0105 0.3 0.3 100 1000 0.0050 0.0155 2.5544 0.8741 0.0105 2.3248 0.0154 0.0105 0.3 0.3 101 1010 0.0040 0.0124 2.5668 0.8825 0.0084 2.3372 0.0123 0.0084 0.2 0.3 102 1020 0.0040 0.0124 2.5792 0.8909 0.0084 2.3495 0.0123 0.0084 0.2 0.3 103 1030 0.0040 0.0124 2.5916 0.8994 0.0085 2.3618 0.0123 0.0085 0.2 0.3 104 1040 0.0040 0.0124 2.6040 0.9078 0.0085 2.3742 0.0123 0.0085 0.2 0.2 105 1050 0.0040 0.0124 2.6164 0.9163 0.0085 2.3865 0.0123 0.0085 0.2 0.2 106 1060 0.0040 0.0124 2.6288 0.9249 0.0085 2.3988 0.0123 0.0085 0.2 0.2 107 1070 0.0040 0.0124 2.6412 0.9334 0.0085 2.4112 0.0123 0.0085 0.2 0.2 108 1080 0.0040 0.0124 2.6536 0.9419 0.0086 2.4235 0.0123 0.0086 0.2 0.2 109 1090 0.0040 0.0124 2.6660 0.9505 0.0086 2.4358 0.0123 0.0086 0.2 0.2 110 1100 0.0040 0.0124 2.6784 0.9591 0.0086 2.4482 0.0123 0.0086 0.2 0.2 111 1110 0.0040 0.0124 2.6908 0.9677 0.0086 2.4605 0.0123 0.0086 0.2 0.2 112 1120 0.0040 0.0124 2.7032 0.9764 0.0086 2.4728 0.0123 0.0086 0.2 0.2 113 1130 0.0040 0.0124 2.7156 0.9850 0.0087 2.4852 0.0123 0.0087 0.2 0.2 114 1140 0.0040 0.0124 2.7280 0.9937 0.0087 2.4975 0.0123 0.0087 0.2 0.2 115 1150 0.0040 0.0124 2.7404 1.0024 0.0087 2.5098 '0.0123 0.0087 0.2 0.2 116 1160 0.0040 0.0124 2.7528 1.0111 0.0087 2.5222 0.0123 0.0087 0.2 0.2 117 1170 0.0040 0.0124 2.7652 1.0198 0.0087 2.5345 0.0123 0.0087 0.2 0.2 118 1180 0.0040 0.0124 2.7776 1.0286 0.0087 2.5469 0.0123 0.0087 0.2 0.2 119 1190 0.0040 0.0124 2.7900 1.0373 0.0088 2.5592 0.0123 0.0088 0.2 0.2 120 1200 0.0040 0.0124 2.8024 1.0461 0.0088 2.5715 0.0123 0.0088 0.2 0.2 121 1210 0.0040 0.0124 2.8148 1.0549 0.0088 2.5839 0.0123 0.0088 0.2 0.2 122 1220 0.0040 0.0124 2.8272 1.0637 0.0088 2.5962 0.0123 0.0088 0.2 0.2 123 1230 0.0040 0.0124 2.8396 1.0726 0.0088 2.6086 0.0123 0.0088 0.2 0.2 124 1240 0.0040 0.0124 2.8520 1.0814 0.0089 2.6209 0.0123 0.0089 0.2 0.2 125 1250. 0.0040 0.0124 2.8644 1.0903 0.0089 2.6333 0.0123 0.0089 0.2 0.2 126 1260 0.0040 0.0124 2.8768 1.0992 0.0089 2.6456 0.0123 0.0089 0.2 0.2 127 1270 0.0040 0.0124 2.8892 1.1081 0.0089 2.6579 0.0123 0.0089 0.3 0.2 128 1280 0.0040 0.0124 2.9016 1.1170 0.0089 2.6703 0.0123 0.0089 0.3 0.2 129 1290 0.0040 0.0124 2.9140 1.1260 0.0089 2.6826 0.0123 0.0089 0.3 0.3 130 1300 0.0040 0.0124 2.9264 1.1349 0.0090 2.6950 0.0123 0.0090 0.3 0.3 131 1310 0.0040 0.0124 2.9388 1.1439 0.0090 2.7073 0.0123 0.0090 0.3 0.3 132 1320 0.0040 0.0124 2.9512 1.1529 0.0090 2.7197 0.0123 0.0090 0.3 0.3 133 1330 0.0040 0.0124 2.9636 1.1619 0.0090 2.7320 0.0123 0.0090 0.3 0.3 134 1340 0.0040 0.0124 2.9760 1.1709 0.0090 2.7444 0.0123 0.0090 0.3 0.3 135 1350 0.0040 0.0124 2.9884 1.1800 0.0090 2.7567 0.0123 0.0090 0.3 0.3 136 1360 0.0040 0.0124 3.0008 1.1891 0.0091 2.7691 0.0123 0.0091 0.3 0.3 137 1370 0.0040 0.0124 3.0132 1.1981 0.0091 2.7814 0.0123 0.0091 0.3 0.3 138 1380 0.0040 0.0124 3.0256 1.2072 0.0091 2.7938 0.0123 0.0091 0.3 0.3 139 1390 0.0040 0.0124 3.0380 1.2163 0.0091 2.8061 0.0123 0.0091 0.3 0.3 140 1400 0.0040 0.0124 3.0504 1.2254 0.0091 2.8185 0.0123 0.0091 0.3 0.3 141 1410 0.0040 0.0124 3.0628 1.2346 0.0091 2.8308 0.0124 0.0091 0.3 0.3 142 1420 0.0040 0.0124 3.0752 1.2437 0.0092 2.8432 0.0124 0.0092 0.3 0.3 143 1430 0.0040 0.0124 3.0876 1.2529 0.0092 2.8555 0.0124 0.0092 0.3 0.3 144 1440 0.0040 0.0124 3.1000 1.2621 0.0092 2.8679 0.0124 0.0092 0.3 0.3 Total 1.0000 3.1000 Hydrograph Volume 20934 (Cubic Feet) File: SBUH-24-pre5.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 3 0 0 CESINW Project: Tigard Baptist Church Project Number: 1845 SANTA BARBARA URBAN HYDROGRAPH Date: 2/11/05 SCS TYPE 1A 24-HOUR DISTRIBUTION Basin: Site Event: 10-year pre Given: Area = 4.64 acres Pt = 3.45 inches dt = 10 min. Tc = 20 min. w = 0.2000 routing constant Pervious Area Impervious Area HYDROGRAPH RESULTS Area = 4.64 acres Area = 0 acres Peak Runoff: 1.3 cfs CN = 79 CN = 98 Total Vol.: 25365 cf S = 2.66 S = 0.20 0.2S = 0.53 0.2S = 0.04 Peak Runoff Hydrograph 1.4 1.2 1.0 2 0.8 U c 3 IL 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 a 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Time in Minutes File: SBUH-24-pre10.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 1 Pervious Area Impervious Area (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated lated mental lated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydra ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (cfs) (CIS) 1 10 0.0040 0.0138 0.0138 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 2 20 0.0040 0.0138 0.0276 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 3 30 0.0040 0.0138 0.0414 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 4 40 0.0040 0.0138 0.0552 0.0000 0.0000 0.0009 0.0009 0.0000 0.0 0.0 5 50 0.0040 0.0138 0.0690 0.0000 0.0000 0.0034 0.0025 0.0000 0.0 0.0 6 60 0.0040 0.0138 0.0828 0.0000 0.0000 0.0072 0.0037 0.0000 0.0 0.0 7 70 0.0040 0.0138 0.0966 0.0000 0.0000 0.0120 0.0048 0.0000 0.0 0.0 8 80 0.0040 0.0138 0.1104 0.0000 0.0000 0.0177 0.0057 0.0000 0.0 0.0 9 90 0.0040 0.0138 0.1242 0.0000 0.0000 0.0242 0.0065 0.0000 0.0 0.0 10 100 0.0040 0.0138 0.1380 0.0000 0.0000 0.0313 0.0072 0.0000 0.0 0.0 11 110 0.0050 0.0173 0.1553 0.0000 0.0000 0.0411 0.0098 0.0000 0.0 0.0 12 120 0.0050 0.0173 0.1725 0.0000 0.0000 0.0516 0.0105 0.0000 0.0 0.0 13 130 0.0050 0.0173 0.1898 0.0000 0.0000 0.0628 0.0112 0.0000 0.0 0.0 14 140 0.0050 0.0173 0.2070 0.0000 0.0000 0.0746 0.0118 0.0000 0.0 0.0 15 150 0.0050 0.0173 0.2243 0.0000 0.0000 0.0868 0.0122 0.0000 0.0 0.0 16 160 0.0050 0.0173 0.2415 0.0000 0.0000 0.0995 0.0127 0.0000 0.0 0.0 17 170 0.0060 0.0207 0.2622 0.0000 0.0000 0.1152 0.0157 0.0000 0.0 0.0 18 180 0.0060 0.0207 0.2829 0.0000 0.0000 0.1314 0.0162 0.0000 0.0 0.0 19 190 0.0060 0.0207 0.3036 0.0000 0.0000 0.1479 0.0166 0.0000 0.0 0.0 20 200 0.0060 0.0207 0.3243 0.0000 0.0000 0.1648 0.0169 0.0000 0.0 0.0 21 210 0.0060 0.0207 0.3450 0.0000 0.0000 0.1820 0.0172 0.0000 0.0 0.0 22 220 0.0060 0.0207 0.3657 0.0000 0.0000 0.1995 0.0175 0.0000 0.0 0.0 23 230 0.0070 0.0242 0.3899 0.0000 0.0000 0.2203 0.0207 0.0000 0.0 0.0 24 240 0.0070 0.0242 0.4140 0.0000 0.0000 0.2413 0.0210 0.0000 0.0 0.0 25 250 0.0070 0.0242 0.4382 0.0000 0.0000 0.2625 0.0213 0.0000 0.0 0.0 26 260 0.0070 0.0242 0.4623 0.0000 0.0000 0.2840 0.0215 0.0000 0.0 0.0 27 270 0.0070 0.0242 0.4865 0.0000 0.0000 0.3057 0.0217 0.0000 0.0 0.0 28 280 0.0070 0.0242 0.5106 0.0000 0.0000 0.3275 0.0219 0.0000 0.0 0.0 29 290 0.0082 0.0283 0.5389 0.0000 0.0000 0.3533 0.0258 0.0000 0.0 0.0 30 300 0.0082 0.0283 0.5672 0.0005 0.0004 0.3793 0.0260 0.0004 0.0 0.0 31 310 0.0082 0.0283 0.5955 0.0015 0.0010 0.4055 0.0262 0.0010 0.0 0.0 32 320 0.0082 0.0283 0.6238 0.0031 0.0016 0.4318 0.0263 0.0016 0.0 0.0 33 330 0.0082 0.0283 0.6521 0.0052 0.0021 0.4582 0.0265 0.0021 0.1 0.0 34 340 0.0082 0.0283 0.6803 0.0079 0.0027 0.4848 0.0266 0.0027 0.1 0.0 35 350 0.0095 0.0328 0.7131 0.0116 0.0037 0.5157 0.0309 0.0037 0.1 0.1 36 360 0.0095 0.0328 0.7459 0.0160 0.0044 0.5468 0.0311 0.0044 0.1 0.1 37 370 0.0095 0.0328 0.7787 0.0210 0.0050 0.5780 0.0312 0.0050 0.1 0.1 38 380 0.0095 0.0328 0.8114 0.0266 0.0056 0.6093 0.0313 0.0056 0.2 0.1 39 390 0.0095 0.0328 0.8442 0.0328 0.0062 0.6407 0.0314 0.0062 0.2 0.1 40 400 0.0095 0.0328 0.8770 0.0397 0.0068 0.6721 0.0315 0.0068 0.2 0.2 41 410 0.0134 0.0462 0.9232 0.0503 0.0106 0.7167 0.0445 0.0106 0.3 0.2 42 420 0.0134 0.0462 0.9695 0.0619 0.0116 0.7613 0.0447 0.0116 0.3 0.2 43 430 0.0134 0.0462 1.0157 0.0746 0.0127 0.8061 0.0448 0.0127 0.4 0.3 44 440 0.0180 0.0621 1.0778 0.0931 0.0185 0.8664 0.0603 0.0185 0.5 0.3 45 450 0.0180 0.0621 1.1399 0.1133 0.0202 0.9269 0.0605 0.0202 0.6 0.4 46 460 0.0340 0.1173 1.2572 0.1556 0.0423 1.0416 0.1147 0.0423 1.2 0.6 47 470 0.0540 0.1863 1.4435 0.2329 0.0773 1.2245 0.1829 0.0773 2.2 1.0 48 480 0.0270 0.0932 1.5366 0.2757 0.0428 1.3162 0.0917 0.0428 1.2 1.3 49 490 0.0180 0.0621 1.5987 0.3057 0.0299 1.3775 0.0612 0.0299 0.8 1.2 50 500 0.0134 0.0462 1.6450 0.3286 0.0230 1.4231 0.0456 0.0230 0.6 1.0 51 510 0.0134 0.0462 1.6912 0.3522 0.0235 1.4688 0.0457 0.0235 0.7 0.9 52 520 0.0134 0.0462 1.7374 0.3763 0.0241 1.5144 0.0457 0.0241 0.7 0.8 53 530 0.0088 0.0304 1.7678 0.3924 0.0161 1.5445 0.0300 0.0161 0.5 0.7 54 540 0.0088 0.0304 1.7981 0.4087 0.0163 1.5745 0.0300 0.0163 0.5 0.6 55 550 0.0088 0.0304 1.8285 0.4252 0.0165 1.6045 0.0300 0.0165 0.5 0.5 56 560 0.0088 0.0304 1.8589 0.4420 0.0168 1.6346 0.0300 0.0168 0.5 0.5 57 570 0.0088 0.0304 1.8892 0.4589 0.0170 1.6646 0.0301 0.0170 0.5 0.5 58 580 0.0088 0.0304 1.9196 0.4761 0.0112 1.6947 0.0301 0.0172 0.5 0.5 59 590 0.0088 0.0304 1.9499 0.4934 0.0174 1.7248 0.0301 0.0174 0.5 0.5 60 600 0.0088 0.0304 1.9803 0.5110 0.0175 1.7548 0.0301 0.0175 0.5 0.5 61 610 0.0088 0.0304 2.0107 0.5287 0.0177 1.7849 0.0301 0.0177 0.5 0.5 62 620 0.0088 0.0304 2.0410 0.5466 0.0179 1.8150 0.0301 0.0179 0.5 0.5 63 630 0.0088 0.0304 2.0714 0.5647 0.0181 1.8451 0.0301 0.0181 0.5 0.5 64 640 0.0088 0.0304 2.1017 0.5830 0.0183 1.8752 0.0301 0.0183 0.5 0.5 65 650 0.0072 0.0248 2.1266 0.5981 0.0151 1.8999 0.0246 0.0151 0.4 0.5 66 660 0.0072 0.0248 2.1514 0.6133 0.0152 1.9245 0.0246 0.0152 0.4 0.5 67 670 0.0072 0.0248 2.1763 0.6286 0.0153 1.9492 0.0246 0.0153 0.4 0.4 68 680 0.0072 0.0248 2.2011 0.6440 0.0154 1.9738 0.0247 0.0154 0.4 0.4 69 690 0.0072 0.0248 2.2259 0.6595 0.0155 1.9985 0.0247 0.0155 0.4 0.4 70 700 0.0072 0.0248 2.2508 0.6752 0.0156 2.0231 0.0247 0.0156 0.4 0.4 71 710 0.0072 0.0248 2.2756 0.6909 0.0157 2.0478 0.0247 0.0157 0.4 0.4 File: SBUH-24-pre10.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 2 • 0 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated Iated mental fated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydro- merit bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (cfs) (cfs) 72 720 0.0072 0.0248 2.3005 0.7067 0.0158 2.0725 0.0247 0.0158 0.4 0.4 73 730 0.0072 0.0248 2.3253 0.7227 0.0159 2.0971 0.0247 0.0159 0.4 0.4 74 740 0.0072 0.0248 2.3501 0.7387 0.0160 2.1218 0.0247 0.0160 0.5 0.4 75 750 0.0072 0.0248 2.3750 0.7548 0.0161 2.1465 0.0247 0.0161 0.5 0.4 76 760 0.0072 0.0248 2.3998 0.7710 0.0162 2.1712 0.0247 0.0162 0.5 0.5 77 770 0.0057 0.0197 2.4195 0.7840 0.0129 2.1907 0.0195 0.0129 0.4 0.4 78 780 0.0057 0.0197 2.4392 0.7969 0.0130 2.2103 0.0195 0.0130 0.4 0.4 79 790 0.0057 0.0197 2.4588 0.8100 0.0130 2.2298 0.0195 0.0130 0.4 0.4 80 800 0.0057 0.0197 2.4785 0.8230 0.0131 2.2493 0.0195 0.0131 0.4 0.4 81 810 0.0057 0.0197 2.4981 0.8362 0.0131 2.2689 0.0195 0.0131 0.4 0.4 82 820 0.0057 0.0197 2.5178 0.8494 0.0132 2.2884 0.0196 0.0132 0.4 0.4 83 830 0.0057 0.0197 2.5375 0.8626 .0.0133 2.3080 0.0196 0.0133 0.4 0.4 84 840 0.0057 0.0197 2.5571 0.8759 0.0133 2.3276 0.0196 0.0133 0.4 0.4 85 850 0.0057 0.0197 2.5768 0.8893 0.0134 2.3471 0.0196 0.0134 0.4 0.4 86 860 0.0057 0.0197 2.5965 0.9027 0.0134 2.3667 0.0196 0.0134 0.4 0.4 87 870 0.0057 0.0197 2.6161 0.9162 0.0135 2.3862 0.0196 0.0135 0.4 0.4 88 880 0.0057 0.0197 2.6358 0.9297 0.0135 2.4058 0.0196 0.0135 0.4 0.4 89 890 0.0050 0.0173 2.6531 0.9416 0.0119 2.4229 0.0172 0.0119 0.3 0.4 90 900 0.0050 0.0173 2.6703 0.9535 0.0119 2.4401 0.0172 0.0119 0.3 0.4 91 910 0.0050 0.0173 2.6876 0.9655 0.0120 2.4573 0.0172 0.0120 0.3 0.3 92 920 0.0050 0.0173 2.7048 0.9775 0.0120 2.4744 0.0172 0.0120 0.3 0.3 93 930 0.0050 0.0173 2.7221 0.9895 0.0120 2.4916 0.0172 0.0120 0.3 0.3 94 940 0.0050 0.0173 2.7393 1.0016 0.0121 2.5088 0.0172 0.0121 0.3 0.3 95 950 0.0050 0.0173 2.7566 1.0137 0.0121 2.5259 0.0172 0.0121 0.3 0.3 96 960 0.0050 0.0173 2.7738 1.0259 0.0122 2.5431 0.0172 0.0122 0.3 0.3 97 970 0.0050 0.0173 2.7911 1.0381 0.0122 2.5602 0.0172 0.0122 0.3 0.3 98 980 0.0050 0.0173 2.8083 1.0503 0.0122 2.5774 0.0172 0.0122 0.3 0.3 99 990 0.0050 0.0173 2.8256 1.0626 0.0123 2.5946 0.0172 0.0123 0.3 0.3 100 1000 0.0050 0.0173 2.8428 1.0749 0.0123 2.6118 0.0172 0.0123 0.3 0.3 101 1010 0.0040 0.0138 2.8566 1.0847 0.0099 2.6255 0.0137 0.0099 0.3 0.3 102 1020 0.0040 0.0138 2.8704 1.0946 0.0099 2.6392 0.0137 0.0099 0.3 0.3 103 1030 0.0040 0.0138 2.8842 1.1045 0.0099 2.6530 0.0137 0.0099 0.3 0.3 104 1040 0.0040 0.0138 2.8980 1.1144 0.0099 2.6667 0.0137 0.0099 0.3 0.3 105 1050 0.0040 0.0138 2.9118 1.1244 0.0099 2.6804 0.0137 0.0099 0.3 0.3 106 1060 0.0040 0.0138 2.9256 1.1344 0.0100 2.6942 0.0137 0.0100 0.3 0.3 107 1070 0.0040 0.0138 2.9394 1.1444 0.0100 2.7079 0.0137 0.0100 0.3 0.3 108 1080 0.0040 0.0138 2.9532 1.1544 0.0100 2.7217 0.0137 0.0100 0.3 0.3 109 1090 0.0040 0.0138 2.9670 1.1644 0.0100 2.7354 0.0137 0.0100 0.3 0.3 110 1100 0.0040 0.0138 2.9808 1.1744 0.0101 2.7491 0.0137 0.0101 0.3 0.3 111 1110 0.0040 0.0138 2.9946 1.1845 0.0101 2.7629 0.0137 0.0101 0.3 0.3 112 1120 0.0040 0.0138 3.0084 1.1946 0.0101 2.7766 0.0137 0.0101 0.3 0.3 113 1130 0.0040 0.0138 3.0222 1.2047 0.0101 2.7904 0.0137 0.0101 0.3 0.3 114 1140 0.0040 0.0138 3.0360 1.2149 0.0101 2.8041 0.0137 0.0101 0.3 0.3 115 1150 0.0040 0.0138 3.0498 1.2250 0.0102 2.8179 0.0137 0.0102 0.3 0.3 116 1160 0.0040 0.0138 3.0636 1.2352 0.0102 2.8316 0.0137 0.0102 0.3 0.3 117 1170 0.0040 0.0138 3.0774 1.2454 0.0102 2.8454 0.0137 0.0102 0.3 0.3 118 1180 0.0040 0.0138 3.0912 1.2556 0.0102 2.8591 0.0137 0.0102 0.3 0.3 119 1190 0.0040 0.0138 3.1050 1.2658 0.0102 2.8728 0.0137 0.0102 0.3 0.3 120 1200 0.0040 0.0138 3.1188 1.2760 0.0102 2.8866 0.0137 0.0102 0.3 0.3 121 1210 0.0040 0.0138 3.1326 1.2863 0.0103 2.9003 0.0137 0.0103 0.3 0.3 122 1220 0.0040 0.0138 3.1464 1.2966 0.0103 2.9141 0.0137 0.0103 0.3 0.3 123 1230 0.0040 0.0138 3.1602 1.3069 0.0103 2.9278 0.0137 0.0103 0.3 0.3 124 1240 0.0040 0.0138 3.1740 1.3172 0.0103 2.9416 0.0137 0.0103 0.3 0.3 125 1250 0.0040 0.0138 3.1878 1.3276 0.0103 2.9553 0.0137 0.0103 0.3 0.3 126 1260 0.0040 0.0138 3.2016 1.3379 0.0104 2.9691. 0.0137 0.0104 0.3 0.3 127 1270 0.0040 0.0138 3.2154 1.3483 0.0104 2.9828 0.0137 0.0104 0.3 0.3 128 1280 0.0040 0.0138 3.2292 1.3587 0.0104 2.9966 0.0137 0.0104 0.3 0.3 129 1290 0.0040 0.0138 3.2430 1.3691 0.0104 3.0103 0.0138 0.0104 0.3 0.3 130 1300 0.0040 0.0138 3.2568 1.3795 0.0104 3.0241 0.0138 0.0104 0.3 0.3 131 1310 0.0040 0.0138 3.2706 1.3900 0.0104 3.0378 0.0138 0.0104 0.3 0.3 132 1320 0.0040 0.0138 3.2844 1.4004 0.0105 3.0516 0.0138 0.0105 0.3 0.3 133 1330 0.0040 0.0138 3.2982 1.4109 0.0105 3.0653 0.0138 0.0105 0.3 0.3 134 1340 0.0040 0.0138 3.3120 1.4214 0.0105 3.0791 0.0138 0.0105 0.3 0.3 135 1350 0.0040 0.0138 3.3258 1.4319 0.0105 3.0928 0.0138 0.0105 0.3 0.3 136 1360 0.0040 0.0138 3.3396 1.4424 0.0105 3.1066 0.0138 0.0105 0.3 0.3 137 1370 0.0040 0.0138 3.3534 1.4530 0.0105 3.1203 0.0138 0.0105 0.3 0.3 138 1380 0.0040 0.0138 3.3672 1.4635 0.0106 3.1341 0.0138 0.0106 0.3 0.3 139 1390 0.0040 0.0138 3.3810 1.4741 0.0106 3.1479 0.0138 0.0106 0.3 0.3 140 1400 0.0040 0.0138 3.3948 1.4847 0.0106 3.1616 0.0138 0.0106 0.3 0.3 141 1410 0.0040 0.0138 3.4086 1.4953 0.0106 3.1754 0.0138 0.0106 0.3 0.3 142 1420 0.0040 0.0138 3.4224 1.5059 0.0106 3.1891 0.0138 0.0106 0.3 0.3 143 1430 0.0040 0.0138 3.4362 1.5166 0.0106 3.2029 0.0138 0.0106 0.3 0.3 144 1440 0.0040 0.0138 3.4500 1.5272 0.0107 3.2166 0.0138 0.0107 0.3 0 3 . Total 1.0000 3.4500 Hydrograph Volume 25365 (Cubic Feet) File: SBUH-24-pre10.X LS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 3 Pervious Area Impervious Area (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated lated mental lated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydro- ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (cfs) (cfs) 1 10 0.0040 0.0156 0.0156 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 2 20 0.0040 0.0156 0.0312 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 3 30 0.0040 0.0156 0.0468 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0002 0.0000 0.0 0.0 4 40 0.0040 0.0156 0.0624 0.0000 0.0000 0.0021 0.0019 0.0000 0.0 0.0 5 50 0.0040 0.0156 0.0780 0.0000 0.0000 0.0057 0.0037 0.0000 0.0 0.0 6 60 0.0040 0.0156 0.0936 0.0000 0.0000 0.0108 0.0051 0.0000 0.0 0.0 7 70 0.0040 0.0156 0.1092 0.0000 0.0000 0.0172 0.0063 0.0000 0.0 0.0 8 80 0.0040 0.0156 0.1248 0.0000 0.0000 0.0245 0.0073 0.0000 0.0 0.0 9 90 0.0040 0.0156 0.1404 0.0000 0.0000 0.0327 0.0082 0.0000 0.0 0.0 10 100 0.0040 0.0156 0.1560 0.0000 0.0000 0.0416 0.0089 0.0000 0.0 0.0 11 110 0.0050 0.0195 0.1755 0.0000 0.0000 0.0535 0.0120 0.0000 0.0 0.0 12 120 0.0050 0.0195 0.1950 0.0000 0.0000 0.0664 0.0128 0.0000 0.0 0.0 13 130 0.0050 0.0195 0.2145 0.0000 0.0000 0.0799 0.0135 0.0000 0.0 0.0 14 140 0.0050 0.0195 0.2340 0.0000 0.0000 0.0939 0.0141 0.0000 0.0 0.0 15 150 0.0050 0.0195 0.2535 0.0000 0.0000 0.1085 0.0146 0.0000 0.0 0.0 16 160 0.0050 0.0195 0.2730 0.0000 0.0000 0.1236 0.0150 0.0000 0.0 0.0 17 170 0.0060 0.0234 0.2964 0.0000 0.0000 0.1421 0.0185 0.0000 0.0 0.0 18 180 0.0060 0.0234 0.3198 0.0000 0.0000 0.1611 0.0190 0.0000 0.0 0.0 19 190 0.0060 0.0234 0.3432 0.0000 0.0000 0.1805 0.0194 0.0000 0.0 0.0 20 200 0.0060 0.0234 0.3666 0.0000 0.0000 0.2003 0.0198 0.0000 0.0 0.0 21 210 0.0060 0.0234 0.3900 0.0000 0.0000 0.2204 0.0201 0.0000 0.0 0.0 22 220 0.0060 0.0234 0.4134 0.0000 0.0000 0.2407 0.0203 0.0000 0.0 0.0 23 230 0.0070 0.0273 0.4407 0.0000 0.0000 0.2648 0.0240 0.0000 0.0 0.0 24 240 0.0070 0.0273 0.4680 0.0000 0.0000 0.2891 0.0243 0.0000 0.0 0.0 25 250 0.0070 0.0273 0.4953 0.0000 0.0000 0.3136 0.0246 0.0000 0.0 0.0 26 260 0.0070 0.0273 0.5226 0.0000 0.0000 0.3384 0.0248 0.0000 0.0 0.0 27 270 0.0070 0.0273 0.5499 0.0001 0.0001 0.3634 0.0250 0.0001 0.0 0.0 28 280 0.0070 0.0273 0.5772 0.0008 0.0006 0.3885 0.0251 0.0006 0.0 0.0 29 290 0.0082 0.0320 0.6092 0.0022 0.0014 0.4182 0.0297 0.0014 0.0 0.0 30 300 0.0082 0.0320 0.6412 0.0043 0.0021 0.4480 0.0298 0.0021 0.1 0.0 31 310 0.0082 0.0320 0.6731 0.0072 0.0028 0.4780 0.0300 0.0028 0.1 0.0 32 320 0.0082 0.0320 0.7051 0.0106 0.0035 0.5082 0.0301 0.0035 0.1 0.1 33 330 0.0082 0.0320 0.7371 0.0147 0.0041 0.5385 0.0303 0.0041 0.1 0.1 34 340 0.0082 0.0320 0.7691 0.0195 0.0047 0.5689 0.0304 0.0047 0.1 0.1 35 350 0.0095 0.0371 0.8061 0.0257 0.0062 0.6042 0.0353 0.0062 0.2 0.1 36 360 0.0095 0.0371 0.8432 0.0327 0.0070 0.6397 0.0355 0.0070 0.2 0.2 37 370 0.0095 0.0371 0.8802 0.0404 0.0077 0.6752 0.0356 0.0077 0.2 0.2 38 380 0.0095 0.0371 0.9173 0.0489 0.0084 0.7109 0.0357 0.0084 0.2 0.2 39 390 0.0095 0.0371 0.9543 0.0580 0.0091 0.7467 0.0358 0.0091 0.3 0.2 40 400 0.0095 0.0371 0.9914 0.0678 0.0098 0.7826 0.0359 0.0098 0.3 0.2 41 410 0.0134 0.0523 1.0436 0.0827 0.0149 0.8333 0.0507 0.0149 0.4 0.3 42 420 0.0134 0.0523 1.0959 0.0988 0.0161 0.8841 0.0508 0.0161 0.5 0.4 43 430 0.0134 0.0523 1.1482 0.1161 0.0173 0.9350 0.0509 0.0173 0.5 0.4 44 440 0.0180 0.0702 1.2184 0.1410 0.0249 1.0036 0.0686 0.0249 0.7 0.5 45 450 0.0180 0.0702 1.2886 0.1678 0.0268 1.0723 0.0687 0.0268 0.8 0.6 46 460 0.0340 0.1326 1.4212 0.2230 0.0553 1.2025 0.1302 0.0553 1.6 0.8 47 470 0.0540 0.2106 1.6318 0.3220 0.0990 1.4101 0.2075 0.0990 2.8 1.4 48 480 0.0270 0.1053 1.7371 0.3761 0.0541 1.5141 0.1040 0.0541 1.5 1.7 49 490 0.0180 0.0702 1.8073 0.4136 0.0376 1.5835 0.0694 0.0376 1.1 1.5 50 500 0.0134 0.0523 1.8595 0.4423 0.0287 1.6352 0.0517 0.0287 0.8 1.3 51 510 0.0134 0.0523 1.9118 0.4717 0.0293 1.6870 0.0517 0.0293 0.8 1.1 52 520 0.0134 0.0523 1.9640 0.5016 0.0299 1.7387 0.0518 0.0299 0.8 1.0 53 530 0.0088 0.0343 1.9984 0.5215 0.0199 1.7727 0.0340 0.0199 0.6 0.9 54 540 0.0088 0.0343 2.0327 0.5417 0.0202 1.8067 0.0340 0.0202 0.6 0.7 55 550 0.0088 0.0343 2.0670 0.5621 0.0204 1.8408 0.0340 0.0204 0.6 0.7 56 560 0.0088 0.0343 2.1013 0.5828 0.0206 1.8748 0.0340 0.0206 0.6 0.6 57 570 0.0088 0.0343 2.1356 0.6036 0.0209 1.9089 0.0340 0.0209 0.6 0.6 58 580 0.0088 0.0343 2.1700 0.6247 0.0211 1.9429 0.0341 0.0211 0.6 0.6 59 590 0.0088 0.0343 2.2043 0.6460 0.0213 1.9770 0.0341 0.0213 0.6 0.6 60 600 0.0088 0.0343 2.2386 0.6675 0.0215 2.0110 0.0341 0.0215 0.6 0.6 61 610 0.0088 0.0343 2.2729 0.6892 0.0217 2.0451 0.0341 0.0217 0.6 0.6 62 620 0.0088 0.0343 2.3072 0.7111 0.0219 2.0792 0.0341 0.0219 0.6 0.6 63 630 0.0088 0.0343 2.3416 0.7331 0.0221 2.1133 0.0341 0.0221 0.6 0.6 64 640 0.0088 0.0343 2.3759 0.7554 0.0223 2.1474 0.0341 0.0223 0.6 0.6 65 650 0.0072 0.0281 2.4040 0.7738 0.0184 2.1753 0.0279 0.0184 0.5 0.6 66 660 0.0072 0.0281 2.4320 0.7922 0.0185 2.2032 0.0279 0.0185 0.5 0.6 67 670 0.0072 0.0281 2.4601 0.8108 0.0186 2.2311 0.0279 0.0186 0.5 0.5 68 680 0.0072 0.0281 2.4882 0.8295 0.0187 2.2590 0.0279 0.0187 0.5 0.5 69 690 0.0072 0.0281 2.5163 0.8484 0.0188 2.2869 0.0279 0.0188 0.5 0.5 70 700 0.0072 0.0281 2.5444 0.8673 0.0189 2.3148 0.0279 0.0189 0.5 0.5 71 710 0.0072 0.0281 2.5724 0.8863 0.0190 2.3428 0.0279 0.0190 0.5 0.5 File: SBUH-24-pre25.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 2 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated lated mental lated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydro- ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) I% of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (cfs) (cfs) 72 720 0.0072 0.0281 2.6005 0.9055 0.0191 2.3707 0.0279 0.0191 0.5 0.5 73 730 0.0072 0.0281 2.6286 0.9247 0.0193 2.3986 0.0279 0.0193 0.5 0.5 74 740 0.0072 0.0281 2.6567 0.9441 0.0194 2.4266 0.0279 0.0194 0.5 0.5 75 750 0.0072 0.0281 2.6848 0.9635 0.0195 2.4545 0.0279 0.0195 0.5 0.5 76 760 0.0072 0.0281 2.7128 0.9831 0.0196 2.4824 0.0279 0.0196 0.5 0.5 77 770 0.0057 0.0222 2.7351 0.9986 0.0156 2.5045 0.0221 0.0156 0.4 0.5 78 780 0.0057 0.0222 2.7573 1.0143 0.0156 2.5267 0.0221 0.0156 0.4 0.5 79 790 0.0057 0.0222 2.7795 1.0299 0.0157 2.5488 0.0221 0.0157 0.4 0.5 80 800 0.0057 0.0222 2.8018 1.0457 0.0157 2.5709 0.0221 0.0157 0.4 0.5 81 810 0.0057 0.0222 2.8240 1.0615 0.0158 2.5930 0.0221 0.0158 0.4 0.4 82 820 0.0057 0.0222 2.8462 1.0773 0.0158 2.6152 0.0221 0.0158 0.4 0.4 83 830 0.0057 0.0222 2.8685 1.0932 0.0159 2.6373 0.0221 0.0159 0.4 0.4 84 840 0.0057 0.0222 2.8907 1.1092 0.0160 2.6594 0.0221 0.0160 0.4 0.4 85 850 0.0057 0.0222 2.9129 1.1252 0.0160 2.6816 0.0221 0.0160 0.4 0.4 86 860 0.0057 0.0222 2.9351 1.1413 0.0161 2.7037 0.0221 0.0161 0.5 0.4 87 870 0.0057 0.0222 2.9574 1.1574 0.0161 2.7258 0.0221 0.0161 0.5 0.5 88 880 0.0057 0.0222 2.9796 1.1736 0.0162 2.7480 0.0221 0.0162 0.5 0.5 89 890 0.0050 0.0195 2.9991 1.1878 0.0142 2.7674 0.0194 0.0142 0.4 0.4 90 900 0.0050 0.0195 3.0186 1.2021 0.0143 2.7868 0.0194 0.0143 0.4 0.4 91 910 0.0050 0.0195 3.0381 1.2164 0.0143 2.8062 0.0194 0.0143 0.4 0.4 92 920 0.0050 0.0195 3.0576 1.2308 0.0144 2.8256 0.0194 0.0144 0.4 0.4 93 930 0.0050 0.0195 3.0771 1.2451 0.0144 2.8451 0.0194 0.0144 0.4 0.4 94 940 0.0050 0.0195 3.0966 1.2596 0.0144 2.8645 0.0194 0.0144 0.4 0.4 95 950 0.0050 0.0195 3.1161 1.2740 0.0145 2.8839 0.0194 0.0145 0.4 0.4 96 960 0.0050 0.0195 3.1356 1.2885 0.0145 2.9033 0.0194 0.0145 0.4 0.4 97 970 0.0050 0.0195 3.1551 1.3031 0.0145 2.9228 0.0194 0.0145 0.4 0.4 98 980 0.0050 0.0195 3.1746 1.3177 0.0146 2.9422 0.0194 0.0146 0.4 0.4 99 990 0.0050 0.0195 3.1941 1.3323 0.0146 2.9616 0.0194 0.0146 0.4 0.4 100 1000 0.0050 0.0195 3.2136 1.3469 0.0147 2.9810 0.0194 0.0147 0.4 0.4 101 1010 0.0040 0.0156 3.2292 1.3587 0.0117 2.9966 0.0155 0.0117 0.3 0.4 102 1020 0.0040 0.0156 3.2448 1.3704 0.0118 3.0121 0.0155 0.0118 0.3 0.4 103 1030 0.0040 0.0156 3.2604 1.3822 0.0118 3.0277 0.0155 0.0118 0.3 0.4 104 1040 0.0040 0.0156 3.2760 1.3941 0.0118 3.0432 0.0155 0.0118 0.3 0.3 105 1050 0.0040 0.0156 3.2916 1.4059 0.0118 3.0588 0.0155 0.0118 0.3 0.3 106 1060 0.0040 0.0156 3.3072 1.4177 0.0119 3.0743 0.0155 0.0119 0.3 0.3 107 1070 0.0040 0.0156 3.3228 1.4296 0.0119 3.0898 0.0155 0.0119 0.3 0.3 108 1080 0.0040 0.0156 3.3384 1.4415 0.0119 3.1054 0.0155 0.0119 0.3 0.3 109 1090 0.0040 0.0156 3.3540 1.4534 0.0119 3.1209 0.0155 0.0119 0.3 0.3 110 1100 0.0040 0.0156 3.3696 1.4654 0.0119 3.1365 0.0155 0.0119 0.3 0.3 111 1110 0.0040 0.0156 3.3852 1.4773 0.0120 3.1520 0.0155 0.0120 0.3 0.3 112 1120 0.0040 0.0156 3.4008 1.4893 0.0120 3.1676 0.0155 0.0120 0.3 0.3 113 1130 0.0040 0.0156 3.4164 1.5013 0.0120 3.1831 0.0155 0.0120 0.3 0.3 114 1140 0.0040 0.0156 3.4320 1.5133 0.0120 3.1987 0.0155 0.0120 0.3 0.3 115 1150 0.0040 0.0156 3.4476 1.5254 0.0120 3.2142 0.0155 0.0120 0.3 0.3 116 1160 0.0040 0.0156 3.4632 1.5375 0.0121 3.2298 0.0156 0.0121 0.3 0.3 117 1170 0.0040 0.0156 3.4788 1.5495 0.0121 3.2453 0.0156 0.0121 0.3 0.3 11B 1180 0.0040 0.0156 3.4944 1.5616 0.0121 3.2609 0.0156 0.0121 0.3 0.3 119 1190 0.0040 0.0156 3.5100 1.5738 0.0121 3.2764 0.0156 0.0121 0.3 0.3 120 1200 0.0040 0.0156 3.5256 1.5859 0.0121 3.2920 0.0156 0.0121 0.3 0.3 121 1210 0.0040 0.0156 3.5412 1.5981 0.0122 3.3075 0.0156 0.0122 0.3 0.3 122 1220 0.0040 0.0156 3.5568 1.6102 0.0122 3.3231 0.0156 0.0122 0.3 0.3 123 1230 0.0040 0.0156 3.5724 1.6224 0.0122 3.3387 0.0156 0.0122 0.3 0.3 124 1240 0.0040 0.0156 3.5880 1.6346 0.0122 3.3542 0.0156 0.0122 0.3 0.3 125 1250 0.0040 0.0156 3.6036 1.6469 0.0122 3.3698 0.0156 0.0122 0.3 0.3 126 1260 0.0040 0.0156 3.6192 1.6591 0.0123 3.3853 0.0156 0.0123 0.3 0.3 127 1270 0.0040 0.0156 3.6348 1.6714 0.0123 3.4009 0.0156 0.0123 0.3 0.3 128 1280 0.0040 0.0156 3.6504 1.6837 0.0123 3.4164 0.0156 0.0123 0.3 0.3 129 1290 0.0040 0.0156 3.6660 1.6960 0.0123 3.4320 0.0156 0.0123 0.3 0.3 130 1300 0.0040 0.0156 3.6816 1.7083 0.0123 3.4475 0.0156 0.0123 0.3 0.3 131 1310 0.0040 0.0156 3.6972 1.7207 0.0123 3.4631 0.0156 0.0123 0.3 0.3 132 1320 0.0040 0.0156 3.7128 1.7330 0.0124 3.4786 0.0156 0.0124 0.3 0.3 133 1330 0.0040 0.0156 3.7284 1.7454 0.0124 3.4942 0.0156 0.0124 0.3 0.3 134 1340 0.0040 0.0156 3.7440 1.7578 0.0124 3.5098 0.0156 0.0124 0.3 0.3 135 1350 0.0040 0.0156 3.7596 1.7702 0.0124 3.5253 0.0156 0.0124 0.3 0.3 136 1360 0.0040 0.0156 3.7752 1.7826 0.0124 3.5409 0.0156 0.0124 0.3 0.3 137 1370 0.0040 0.0156 3.7908 1.7951 0.0124 3.5564 0.0156 0.0124 0.3 0.3 138 1380 0.0040 0.0156 3.8064 1.8075 0.0125 3.5720 0.0156 0.0125 0.3 0.3 139 1390 0.0040 0.0156 3.8220 1.8200 0.0125 3.5876 0.0156 0.0125 0.4 0.3 140 1400 0.0040 0.0156 3.8376 1.8325 0.0125 3.6031 0.0156 0.0125 0.4 0.3 141 1410 0.0040 0.0156 3.8532 1.8450 0.0125 3.6187 0.0156 0.0125 0.4 0.4 142 1420 0.0040 0.0156 3.8688 1.8575 0.0125 3.6342 0.0156 0.0125 0.4 0.4 143 1430 0.0040 0.0156 3.8844 1.8701 0.0125 3.6498 0.0156 0.0125 0.4 0.4 144 1440 0.0040 0.0156 3.9000 1.8826 0.0126 3.6654 0.0156 0.0126 0.4 0.4 Total 1.0000 3.9000 Hydrograph Volume 31329 (Cubic Feet) File: SBUH-24-pre25.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 3 0 CES NNW SANTA BARBARA URBAN HYDROGRAPH SCS TYPE 1A 24-HOUR DISTRIBUTION Given: Area = 4.64 acres Pt = 2.5 inches dt = 10 min. Tc = 14 min. W = 0.2632 routing constant Pervious Area Impervious Area Area = 2.66 acres Area = 1.98 acres CN = 79 CN = 98 S = 2.66 S = 0.20 0.2S = 0.53 0.2S = 0.04 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 U c 0.8 3 0 iz 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 Project: Tigard Baptist Church Project Number: 1845 Date: 2111105 Basin: Site Event: 2-year post HYDROGRAPH RESULTS Peak Runoff: 1.5 cfs Total Vol.: 24216 cf Peak Runoff Hydrograph 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Time in Minutes 1200 1400 1600 File: SBUH-24-poWALS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 1 • M Pervious Area Impervious Area (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated fated mental lated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydro- ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (cfs) (cfs) 1 10 0.0040 0.0100 0.0100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 2 20 0.0040 0.0100 0.0200 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 3 30 0.0040 0.0100 0.0300 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 4 40 0.0040 0.0100 0.0400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 5 50 0.0040 0.0100 0.0500 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.0004 0.0002 0.0 0.0 6 60 0.0040 0.0100 0.0600 0.0000 0.0000 0.0016 0.0013 0.0005 0.0 0.0 7 70 0.0040 0.0100 0.0700 0.0000 0.0000 0.0037 0.0020 0.0009 0.0 0.0 8 80 0.0040 0.0100 0.0800 0.0000 0.0000 0.0063 0.0027 0.0011 0.0 0.0 9 90 0.0040 0.0100 0.0900 0.0000 0.0000 0.0096 0.0032 0.0014 0.0 0.0 10 100 0.0040 0.0100 0.1000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0133 0.0038 0.0016 0.0 0.0 11 110 0.0050 0.0125 0.1125 0.0000 0.0000 0.0186 0.0053 0.0023 0.1 0.0 12 120 0.0050 0.0125 0.1250 0.0000 0.0000 0.0246 0.0060 0.0025 0.1 0.1 13 130 0.0050 0.0125 0.1375 0.0000 0.0000 0.0311 0.0065 0.0028 0.1 0.1 14 140 0.0050 0.0125 0.1500 0.0000 0.0000 0.0381 0.0070 0.0030 0.1 0.1 15 150 0.0050 0.0125 0.1625 0.0000 0.0000 0.0455 0.0074 0.0032 0.1 0.1 16 160 0.0050 0.0125 0.1750 0.0000 0.0000 0.0532 0.0078 0.0033 0.1 0.1 17 170 0.0060 0.0150 0.1900 0.0000 0.0000 0.0630 0.0098 0.0042 0.1 0.1 18 180 0.0060 0.0150 0.2050 0.0000 0.0000 0.0732 0.0102 0.0044 0.1 0.1 19 190 0.0060 0.0150 0.2200 0.0000 0.0000 0.0838 0.0106 0.0045 0.1 0.1 20 200 0.0060 0.0150 0.2350 0.0000 0.0000 0.0947 0.0109 0.0047 0.1 0.1 21 210 0.0060 0.0150 0.2500 0.0000 0.0000 0.1059 0.0112 0.0048 0.1 0.1 22 220 0.0060 0.0150 0.2650 0.0000 0.0000 0.1174 0.0115 0.0049 0.1 0.1 23 230 0.0070 0.0175 0.2825 0.0000 0.0000 0.1310 0.0137 0.0058 0.2 0.1 24 240 0.0070 0.0175 0.3000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1450 0.0140 0.0060 0.2 0.2 25 250 0.0070 0.0175 0.3175 0.0000 0.0000 0.1592 0.0142 0.0061 0.2 0.2 26 260 0.0070 0.0175 0.3350 0.0000 0.0000 0.1737 0.0145 0.0062 0.2 0.2 27 270 0.0070 0.0175 0.3525 0.0000 0.0000 0.1884 0.0147 0.0063 0.2 0.2 28 280 0.0070 0.0175 0.3700 0.0000 0.0000 0.2032 0.0148 0.0063 0.2 0.2 29 290 0.0082 0.0205 0.3905 0.0000 0.0000 0.2208 0.0176 0.0075 0.2 0.2 30 300 0.0082 0.0205 0.4110 0.0000 0.0000 0.2386 0.0178 0.0076 0.2 0.2 31 310 0.0082 0.0205 0.4315 0.0000 0.0000 0.2566 0.0180 0.0077 0.2 0.2 32 320 0.0082 0.0205 0.4520 0.0000 0.0000 0.2748 0.0182 0.0078 0.2 0.2 33 330 0.0082 0.0205 0.4725 0.0000 0.0000 0.2931 0.0183 0.0078 0.2 0.2 34 340 0.0082 0.0205 0.4930 0.0000 0.0000 0.3116 0.0185 0.0079 0.2 0.2 35 350 0.0095 0.0238 0.5168 0.0000 0.0000 0.3331 0.0215 0.0092 0.3 0.2 36 360 0.0095 0.0238 0.5405 0.0000 0.0000 0.3548 0.0217 0.0093 0.3 0.2 37 370 0.0095 0.0238 0.5643 0.0004 0.0004 0.3766 0.0218 0.0095 0.3 0.3 38 380 0.0095 0.0238 0.5880 0.0012 0.0008 0.3985 0.0219 0.0098 0.3 0.3 39 390 0.0095 0.0238 0.6118 0.0023 0.0012 0.4206 0.0221 0.0101 0.3 0.3 40 400 0.0095 0.0238 0.6355 0.0039 0.0016 0.4427 0.0222 0.0103 0.3 0.3 41 410 0.0134 0.0335 0.6690 0.0067 0.0028 0.4741 0.0314 0.0150 0.4 0.3 42 420 0.0134 0.0335 0.7025 0.0103 0.0036 0.5057 0.0316 0.0155 0.4 0.4 43 430 0.0134 0.0335 0.7360 0.0146 0.0043 0.5374 0.0317 0.0160 0.4 0.4 44 440 0.0180 0.0450 0.7810 0.0214 0.0068 0.5802 0.0428 0.0222 0.6 0.5 45 450 0.0180 0.0450 0.8260 0.0293 0.0080 0.6232 0.0430 0.0229 0.6 0.6 46 460 0.0340 0.0850 0.9110 0.0474 0.0180 0.7049 0.0817 0.0452 1.3 0.8 47 470 0.0540 0.1350 1.0460 0.0834 0.0360 0.8355 0.1307 0.0764 2.1 1.3 48 480 0.0270 0.0675 1.1135 0.1045 0.0211 0.9012 0.0657 0.0401 1.1 1.5 49 490 0.0180 0.0450 1.1585 0.1196 0.0151 0.9451 0.0439 0.0274 0.8 1.2 50 500 0.0134 0.0335 1.1920 0.1314 0.0118 0.9778 0.0327 0.0207 0.6 0.9 51 510 0.0134 0.0335 1.2255 0.1436 0.0122 1.0106 0.0328 0.0210 0.6 0.7 52 520 0.0134 0.0335 1.2590 0.1563 0.0126 1.0434 0.0328 0.0212 0.6 0.7 53 530 0.0088 0.0220 1.2810 0.1648 0.0085 1.0649 0.0216 0.0141 0.4 0.6 54 540 0.0088 0.0220 1.3030 0.1735 0.0087 1.0865 0.0216 0.0142 0.4 0.5 55 550 0.0088 0.0220 1.3250 0.1824 0.0089 1.1081 0.0216 0.0143 0.4 0.4 56 560 0.0088 0.0220 1.3470 0.1914 0.0090 1.1297 0.0216 0.0144 0.4 0.4 57 570 0.0088 0.0220 1.3690 0.2006 0.0092 1.1513 0.0216 0.0145 0.4 0.4 58 580 0.0088 0.0220 1.3910 0.2099 0.0094 1.1729 0.0216 0.0146 0.4 0.4 59 590 0.0088 0.0220 1.4130 0.2195 0.0095 1.1945 0.0216 0.0147 0.4 0.4 60 600 0.0088 0.0220 1.4350 0.2291 0.0097 1.2162 0.0216 0.0148 0.4 0.4 61 610 0.0088 0.0220 1.4570 0.2389 0.0098 1.2378 0.0216 0.0149 0.4 0.4 62 620 0.0088 0.0220 1.4790 0.2489 0.0100 1.2595 0.0217 0.0150 0.4 0.4 63 630 0.0088 0.0220 1.5010 0.2590 0.0101 1.2811 0.0217 0.0150 0.4 0.4 64 640 0.0088 0.0220 1.5230 0.2693 0.0103 1.3028 0.0217 0.0151 0.4 0.4 65 650 0.0072 0.0180 1.5410 0.2778 0.0085 1.3205 0.0177 0.0124 0.3 0.4 66 660 0.0072 0.0180 1.5590 0.2864 0.0086 1.3383 0.0177 0.0125 0.4 0.4 67 670 0.0072 0.0180 1.5770 0.2951 0.0087 1.3560 0.0177 0.0126 0.4 0.4 68 680 0.0072 0.0180 1.5950 0.3038 0.0088 1.3738 0.0178 0.0126 0.4 0.4 69 690 0.0072 0.0180 1.6130 0.3127 0.0089 1.3915 0.0178 0.0127 0.4 0.4 70 700 0.0072 0.0180 1.6310 0.3216 0.0089 1.4093 0.0178 0.0127 0.4 0.4 71 710 0.0072 0.0180 1.6490 0.3307 0.0090 1.4271 0.0178 0.0128 0.4 0.4 File: SBUH-24-post2.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 2 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated lated mental lated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydro- ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (I n) (in) (cfs) (cfs) 72 720 0.0072 0.0180 1.6670 0.3398 0.0091 1.4449 0.0178 0.0128 0.4 0.4 73 730 0.0072 0.0180 1.6850 0.3490 0.0092 1.4626 0.0178 0.0129 0.4 0.4 74 740 0.0072 0.0180 1.7030 0.3583 0.0093 1.4804 0.0178 0.0129 0.4 0.4 75 750 0.0072 0.0180 1.7210 0.3677 0.0094 1.4982 0.0178 0.0130 0.4 0.4 76 760 0.0072 0.0180 1.7390 0.3771 0.0094 1.5160 0.0178 0.0130 0.4 0.4 77 770 0.0057 0.0143 1.7533 0.3846 0.0075 1.5301 0.0141 0.0103 0.3 0.3 78 780 0.0057 0.0143 1.7675 0.3922 0.0076 1.5442 0.0141 0.0104 0.3 0.3 79 790 0.0057 0.0143 1.7818 0.3999 0.0076 1.5583 0.0141 0.0104 0.3 0.3 80 800 0.0057 0.0143 1.7960 0.4075 0.0077 1.5724 0.0141 0.0104 0.3 0.3 81 810 0.0057 0.0143 1.8103 0.4153 0.0077 1.5865 0.0141 0.0104 0.3 0.3 82 820 0.0057 0.0143 1.8245 0.4230 0.0078 1.6006 0.0141 0.0105 0.3 0.3 83 830 0.0057 0.0143 1.8388 0.4309 0.0078 1.6147 0.0141 0.0105 0.3 0.3 84 840 0.0057 0.0143 1.8530 0.4387 0.0079 1.6288 0.0141 0.0105 0.3 0.3 85 850 0.0057 0.0143 1.8673 0.4466 0.0079 1.6429 0.0141 0.0106 0.3 0.3 86 860 0.0057 0.0143 1.8815 0.4546 0.0080 1.6570 0.0141 0.0106 0.3 0.3 87 870 0.0057 0.0143 1.8958 0.4626 0.0080 1.6711 0.0141 0.0106 0.3 0.3 88 880 0.0057 0.0143 1.9100 0.4707 0.0080 1.6852 0.0141 0.0106 0.3 0.3 89 890 0.0050 0.0125 1.9225 0.4778 0.0071 1.6976 0.0124 0.0094 0.3 0.3 90 900 0.0050 0.0125 1.9350 0.4849 0.0071 1.7100 0.0124 0.0094 0.3 0.3 91 910 0.0050 0.0125 1.9475 0.4920 0.0072 1.7223 0.0124 0.0094 0.3 0.3 92 920 0.0050 0.0125 1.9600 0.4992 0.0072 1.7347 0.0124 0.0094 0.3 0.3 93 930 0.0050 0.0125 1.9725 0.5065 0.0072 1.7471 0.0124 0.0094 0.3 0.3 94 940 0.0050 0.0125 1.9850 0.5137 0.0073 1.7595 0.0124 0.0094 0.3 0.3 95 950 0.0050 0.0125 1.9975 0.5210 0.0073 1.7719 0.0124 0.0095 0.3 0.3 96 960 0.0050 0.0125 2.0100 0.5283 0.0073 1.7843 0.0124 0.0095 0.3 0.3 97 970 0.0050 0.0125 2.0225 0.5357 0.0074 1.7967 0.0124 0.0095 0.3 0.3 98 980 0.0050 0.0125 2.0350 0.5431 0.0074 1.8090 0.0124 0.0095 0.3 0.3 99 990 0.0050 0.0125 2.0475 0.5505 0.0074 1.8214 0.0124 0.0095 0.3 0.3 100 1000 0.0050 0.0125 2.0600 0.5579 0.0074 1.8338 0.0124 0.0096 0.3 0.3 101 1010 0.0040 0.0100 2.0700 0.5639 0.0060 1.8438 0.0099 0.0077 0.2 0.3 102 1020 0.0040 0.0100 2.0800 0.5699 0.0060 1.8537 0.0099 0.0077 0.2 0.2 103 1030 0.0040 0.0100 2.0900 0.5759 0.0060 1.8636 0.0099 0.0077 0.2 0.2 104 1040 0.0040 0.0100 2.1000 0.5820 0.0060 1.8735 0.0099 0.0077 0.2 0.2 105 1050 0.0040 0.0100 2.1100 0.5880 0.0061 1.8834 0.0099 0.0077 0.2 0.2 106 1060 0.0040 0.0100 2.1200 0.5941 0.0061 1.8933 0.0099 0.0077 0.2 0.2 107 1070 0.0040 0.0100 2.1300 0.6002 0.0061 1.9033 0.0099 0.0077 0.2 0.2 108 1080 0.0040 0.0100 2.1400 0.6063 0.0061 1.9132 0.0099 0.0077 0.2 0.2 109 1090 0.0040 0.0100 2.1500 0.6124 0.0061 1.9231 0.0099 0.0077 0.2 0.2 110 1100 0.0040 0.0100 2.1600 0.6186 0.0061 1.9330 0.0099 0.0078 0.2 0.2 111 1110 0.0040 0.0100 2.1700 0.6247 0.0062 1.9430 0.0099 0.0078 0.2 0.2 112 1120 0.0040 0.0100 2.1800 0.6309 0.0062 1.9529 0.0099 0.0078 0.2 0.2 113 1130 0.0040 0.0100 2.1900 0.6371 0.0062 1.9628 0.0099 0.0078 0.2 0.2 114 1140 0.0040 0.0100 2.2000 0.6433 0.0062 1.9727 0.0099 0.0078 0.2 0.2 115 1150 0.0040 0.0100 2.2100 0.6496 0.0062 1.9827 0.0099 0.0078 0.2 0.2 116 1160 0.0040 0.0100 2.2200 0.6558 0.0063 1.9926 0.0099 0.0078 0.2 0.2 117 1170 0.0040 0.0100 2.2300 0.6621 0.0063 2.0025 0.0099 0.0078 0.2 0.2 118 1180 0.0040 0.0100 2.2400 0.6684 0.0063 2.0124 0.0099 0.0078 0.2 0.2 119 1190 0.0040 0.0100 2.2500 0.6747 0.0063 2.0224 0.0099 0.0078 0.2 0.2 120 1200 0.0040 0.0100 2.2600 0.6810 0.0063 2.0323 0.0099 0.0079 0.2 0.2 121 1210 0.0040 0.0100 2.2700 0.6873 0.0063 2.0422 0.0099 0.0079 0.2 0.2 122 1220 0.0040 0.0100 2.2800 0.6937 0.0064 2.0521 0.0099 0.0079 0.2 0.2 123 1230 0.0040 0.0100 2.2900 0.7000 0.0064 2.0621 0.0099 0.0079 0.2 0.2 124 1240 0.0040 0.0100 2.3000 0.7064 0.0064 2.0720 0.0099 0.0079 0.2 0.2 125 1250 0.0040 0.0100 2.3100 0.7128 0.0064 2.0819 0.0099 0.0079 0.2 0.2 126 1260 0.0040 0.0100 2.3200 0.7193 0.0064 2.0919 0.0099 0.0079 0.2 0.2 127 1270 0.0040 0.0100 2.3300 0.7257 0.0064 2.1018 0.0099 0.0079 0.2 0.2 128 1280 0.0040 0.0100 2.3400 0.7321 0.0065 2.1117 0.0099 0.0079 0.2 0.2 129 1290 0.0040 0.0100 2.3500 0.7386 0.0065 2.1217 0.0099 0.0079 0.2 0.2 130 1300 0.0040 0.0100 2.3600 0.7451 0.0065 2.1316 0.0099 0.0080 0.2 0.2 131 1310 0.0040 0.0100 2.3700 0.7516 0.0065 2 141 S n nnoo An An n n 132 1320 0.0040 0.0100 2.3800 0.7581 0.0065 2.1515 0.0099 0.0080 0.2 0.2 133 1330 0.0040 0.0100 2.3900 0.7646 0.0065 2.1614 0.0099 0.0080 0.2 0.2 134 1340 0.0040 0.0100 2.4000 0.7712 0.0065 2.1714 0.0099 0.0080 0.2 0.2 135 1350 0.0040 0.0100 2.4100 0.7777 0.0066 2.1813 0.0099 0.0080 0.2 0.2 136 1360 0.0040 0.0100 2.4200 0.7843 0.0066 2.1912 0.0099 0.0080 0.2 0.2 137 1370 0.0040 0.0100 2.4300 0.7909 0.0066 2.2012 0.0099 0.0080 0.2 0.2 138 1380 0.0040 0.0100 2.4400 0.7975 0.0066 2.2111 0.0099 0.0080 0.2 0.2 139 1390 0.0040 0.0100 2.4500 0.8041 0.0066 2.2210 0.0099 0.0080 0.2 0.2 140 1400 0.0040 0.0100 2.4600 0.8107 0.0066 2.2310 0.0099 0.0080 0.2 0.2 141 1410 0.0040 0.0100 2.4700 0.8174 0.0066 2.2409 0.0099 0.0081 0.2 0.2 142 1420 0.0040 0.0100 2.4800 0.8241 0.0067 2.2509 0.0099 0.0081 0.2 0.2 143 1430 0.0040 0.0100 2.4900 0.8307 0.0067 2.2608 0.0099 0.0081 0.2 0.2 144 1440 0.0040 0.0100 2.5000 0.8374 0.0067 2.2707 0.0099 0.0081 0.2 0.2 Total 1.0000 2.5000 Hydrograph Volume 24216 (Cubic Feet) File: SBUH-24-post2.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 3 CESINW Project: Tigard Baptist Church Project Number. 1845 SANTA BARBARA URBAN HYDROGRAPH Date: 2111105 SCS TYPE 1A 24-HOUR DISTRIBUTION Basin: Site Event: 5-year post Given: Area = 4.64 acres Pt = 3.1 inches dt = 10 min. Tc = 12 min. W = 0.2941 routing constant Pervious Area Impervious Area HYDROGRAPH RESULTS Area = 2.66 acres Area = 1.98 acres Peak Runoff: 2.1 cfs CN = 79 CN = 98 Total Vol.: 32586 cf S = 2.66 S = 0.20 0.2S = 0.53 0.2S = 0.04 Peak Runoff Hydrograph 2.5 2.0 1.5 y U C_ 3 0 1.0 0.5 0.0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Time in Minutes 1400 1600 File: SBUH-24-Post5.XI-S 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 1 i • Pervious Area Impervious Area (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated lated mental fated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydro- ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (cfs) (cfs) 1 10 0.0040 0.0124 0.0124 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 2 20 0.0040 0.0124 0.0248 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 3 30 0.0040 0.0124 0.0372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 4 40 0.0040 0.0124 0.0496 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.0004 0.0002 0.0 0.0 5 50 0.0040 0.0124 0.0620 0.0000 0.0000 0.0020 0.0016 0.0007 0.0 0.0 6 60 0.0040 0.0124 0.0744 0.0000 0.0000 0.0047 0.0028 0.0012 0.0 0.0 7 70 0.0040 0.0124 0.0868 0.0000 0.0000 0.0085 0.0037 0.0016 0.0 0.0 8 80 0.0040 0.0124 0.0992 0.0000 0.0000 0.0130 0.0045 0.0019 0.1 0.0 9 90 0.0040 0.0124 0.1116 0.0000 0.0000 0.0182 0.0052 0.0022 0.1 0.1 10 100 0.0040 0.0124 0.1240 0.0000 0.0000 0.0241 0.0059 0.0025 0.1 0.1 11 110 0.0050 0.0155 0.1395 0.0000 0.0000 0.0322 0.0081 0.0034 0.1 0.1 12 120 0.0050 0.0155 0.1550 0.0000 0.0000 0.0410 0.0088 0.0038 0.1 0.1 13 130 0.0050 0.0155 0.1705 0.0000 0.0000 0.0504 0.0094 0.0040 0.1 0.1 14 140 0.0050 0.0155 0.1860 0.0000 0.0000 0.0604 0.0100 0.0043 0.1 0.1 15 150 0.0050 0.0155 0.2015 0.0000 0.0000 0.0708 0.0104 0.0045 0.1 0.1 16 160 0.0050 0.0155 0.2170 0.0000 0.0000 0.0816 0.0108 0.0046 0.1 0.1 17 170 0.0060 0.0186 0.2356 0.0000 0.0000 0.0951 0.0135 0.0058 0.2 0.1 18 180 0.0060 0.0186 0.2542 0.0000 0.0000 0.1091 0.0139 0.0060 0.2 0.2 19 190 0.0060 0.0186 0.2728 0.0000 0.0000 0.1234 0.0143 0.0061 0.2 0.2 20 200 0.0060 0.0186 0.2914 0.0000 0.0000 0.1381 0.0147 0.0063 0.2 0.2 21 210 0.0060 0.0186 0.3100 0.0000 0.0000 0.1531 0.0150 0.0064 0.2 0.2 22 220 0.0060 0.0186 0.3286 0.0000 0.0000 0.1684 0.0153 0.0065 0.2 0.2 23 230 0.0070 0.0217 0.3503 0.0000 0.0000 0.1865 0.0181 0.0077 0.2 0.2 24 240 0.0070 0.0217 0.3720 0.0000 0.0000 0.2049 0.0184 0.0079 0.2 0.2 25 250 0.0070 0.0217 0.3937 0.0000 0.0000 0.2236 0.0187 0.0080 0.2 0.2 26 260 0.0070 0.0217 0.4154 0.0000 0.0000 0.2425 0.0189 0.0081 0.2 0.2 27 270 0.0070 0.0217 0.4371 0.0000 0.0000 0.2616 0.0191 0.0081 0.2 0.2 28 280 0.0070 0.0217 0.4588 0.0000 0.0000 0.2809 0.0193 0.0082 0.2 0.2 29 290 0.0082 0.0254 0.4842 0.0000 0.0000 0.3036 0.0228 0.0097 0.3 0.2 30 300 0.0082 0.0254 0.5096 0.0000 0.0000 0.3266 0.0230 0.0098 0.3 0.3 31 310 0.0082 0.0254 0.5351 0.0000 0.0000 0.3498 0.0232 0.0099 0.3 0.3 32 320 0.0082 0.0254 0.5605 0.0003 0.0003 0.3731 0.0233 0.0101 0.3 0.3 33 330 0.0082 0.0254 0.5859 0.0011 0.0008 0.3966 0.0235 0.0105 0.3 0.3 34 340 0.0082 0.0254 0.6113 0.0023 0.0012 0.4202 0.0236 0.0108 0.3 0.3 35 350 0.0095 0.0295 0.6408 0.0043 0.0020 0.4477 0.0275 0.0129 0.4 0.3 36 360 0.0095 0.0295 0.6702 0.0069 0.0026 0.4753 0.0276 0.0133 0.4 0.3 37 370 0.0095 0.0295 0.6997 0.0100 0.0031 0.5030 0.0277 0.0136 0.4 0.4 38 380 0.0095 0.0295 0.7291 0.0137 0.0037 0.5309 0.0279 0.0140 0.4 0.4 39 390 0.0095 0.0295 0.7586 0.0178 0.0042 0.5589 0.0280 0.0143 0.4 0.4 40 400 0.0095 0.0295 0.7880 0.0226 0.0047 0.5869 0.0281 0.0147 0.4 0.4 41 410 0.0134 0.0415 0.8296 0.0300 0.0075 0.6266 0.0397 0.0212 0.6 0.5 42 420 0.0134 0.0415 0.8711 0.0384 0.0084 0.6665 0.0399 0.0218 0.6 0.5 43 430 0.0134 0.0415 0.9126 0.0478 0.0093 0.7065 0.0400 0.0224 0.6 0.6 44 440 0.0180 0.0558 0.9684 0.0616 0.0139 0.7603 0.0539 0.0310 0.9 0.7 45 450 0.0180 0.0558 1.0242 0.0770 0.0154 0.8144 0.0541 0.0319 0.9 0.8 46 460 0.0340 0.1054 1.1296 0.1098 0.0328 0.9170 0.1025 0.0626 1.8 1.1 47 470 0.0540 0.1674 1.2970 0.1711 0.0613 1.0807 0.1637 0.1050 2.9 1.8 48 480 0.0270 0.0837 1.3807 0.2056 0.0344 1.1628 0.0822 0.0548 1.5 2.1 49 490 0.0180 0.0558 1.4365 0.2298 0.0242 1.2177 0.0549 0.0373 1.0 1.6 50 500 0.0134 0.0415 1.4781 0.2485 0.0187 1.2586 0.0409 0.0282 0.8 1.2 51 510 0.0134 0.0415 1.5196 0.2677 0.0192 1.2995 0.0409 0.0285 0.8 1.0 52 520 0.0134 0.0415 1.5612 0.2874 0.0197 1.3404 0.0409 0.0288 0.8 0.9 53 530 0.0088 0.0273 1.5884 0.3006 0.0132 1.3673 0.0269 0.0191 0.5 0.8 54 540 0.0088 0.0273 1.6157 0.3140 0.0134 1.3942 0.0269 0.0192 0.5 0.6 55 550 0.0088 0.0273 1.6430 0.3277 0.0136 1.4212 0.0269 0.0193 0.5 0.6 56 560 0.0088 0.0273 1.6703 0.3415 0.0138 1.4481 0.0269 0.0194 0.5 0.6 57 570 0.0088 0.0273 1.6976 0.3555 0.0140 1.4750 0.0269 0.0195 0.5 0.6 58 580 0.0088 0.0273 1.7248 0.3697 0.0142 1.5020 0.0270 0.0196 0.6 0.6 59 590 0.0088 0.0273 1.7521 0.3840 0.0144 1.5290 0.0270 0.0197 0.6 0.6 60 600 0.0088 0.0273 1.7794 0.3986 0.0146 1.5559 0.0270 0.0199 0.6 0.6 61 610 0.0088 0.0273 1.8067 0.4133 0.0147 1.5829 0.0270 0.0200 0.6 0.6 62 620 0.0088 0.0273 1.8340 0.4282 0.0149 1.6099 0.0270 0.0201 0.6 0.6 63 630 0.0088 0.0273 1.8612 0.4433 0.0151 1.6369 0.0270 0.0202 0.6 0.6 64 640 0.0088 0.0273 1.8885 0.4585 0.0152 1.6639 0.0270 0.0203 0.6 0.6 65 650 0.0072 0.0223 1.9108 0.4711 0.0126 1.6860 0.0221 0.0166 0.5 0.5 66 660 0.0072 0.0223 1.9332 0.4838 0.0127 1.7081 0.0221 0.0167 0.5 0.5 67 670 0.0072 0.0223 1.9555 0.4966 0.0128 1.7302 0.0221 0.0168 0.5 0.5 68 680 0.0072 0.0223 1.9778 0.5095 0.0129 1.7524 0.0221 0.0168 0.5 0.5 69 690 0.0072 0.0223 2.0001 0.5226 0.0130 1.7745 0.0221 0.0169 0.5 0.5 70 700 0.0072 0.0223 2.0224 0.5357 0.0131 1.7966 0.0221 0.0170 0.5 0.5 71 710 0.0072 0.0223 2.0448 0.5489 0.0132 1.8187 0.0221 0.0170 0.5 0.5 File: SBUH-24-post5.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 2 0 0 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated lated mental lated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydro- ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (cfs) (cfs) 72 720 0.0072 0.0223 2.0671 0.5622 0.0133 1.8409 0.0221 0.0171 0.5 0.5 73 730 0.0072 0.0223 2.0894 0.5756 0.0134 1.8630 0.0221 0.0171 0.5 0.5 74 740 0.0072 0.0223 2.1117 0.5891 0.0135 1.8851 0.0221 0.0172 0.5 0.5 75 750 0.0072 0.0223 2.1340 0.6027 0.0136 1.9073 0.0221 0.0172 0.5 0.5 76 760 0.0072 0.0223 2.1564 0.6163 0.0137 1.9294 0.0221 0.0173 0.5 0.5 77 770 0.0057 0.0177 2.1740 0.6272 0.0109 1.9470 0.0175 0.0137 0.4 0.5 78 780 0.0057 0.0177 2.1917 0.6382 0.0109 1.9645 0.0175 0.0138 0.4 0.4 79 790 0.0057 0.0177 2.2094 0.6492 0.0110 1.9820 0.0175 0.0138 0.4 0.4 80 800 0.0057 0.0177 2.2270 0.6602 0.0111 1.9996 0.0175 0.0138 0.4 0.4 81 810 0.0057 0.0177 2.2447 0.6713 0.0111 2.0171 0.0175 0.0139 0.4 0.4 82 820 0.0057 0.0177 2.2624 0.6825 0.0112 2.0347 0.0175 0.0139 0.4 0.4 83 830 0.0057 0.0177 2.2801 0.6937 0.0112 2.0522 0.0175 0.0139 0.4 0.4 84 840 0.0057 0.0177 2.2977 0.7050 0.0113 2.0697 0.0175 0.0139 0.4 0.4 85 850 0.0057 0.0177 2.3154 0.7163 0.0113 2.0873 0.0175 0.0140 0.4 0.4 86 860 0.0057 0.0177 2.3331 0.7277 0.0114 2.1048 0.0176 0.0140 0.4 0.4 87 870 0.0057 0.0177 2.3507 0.7391 0.0114 2.1224 0.0176 0.0140 0.4 0.4 88 880 0.0057 0.0177 2.3684 0.7505 0.0115 2.1400 0.0176 0.0141 0.4 0.4 89 890 0.0050 0.0155 2.3839 0.7606 0.0101 2.1554 0.0154 0.0124 0.3 0.4 90 900 0.0050 0.0155 2.3994 0.7708 0.0101 2.1708 0.0154 0.0124 0.3 0.4 91 910 0.0050 0.0155 2.4149 0.7809 0.0102 2.1862 0.0154 0.0124 0.3 0.4 92 920 0.0050 0.0155 2.4304 0.7912 0.0102 2.2016 0.0154 0.0124 0.3 0.4 93 930 0.0050 0.0155 2.4459 0.8014 0.0102 2.2170 0.0154 0.0124 0.3 0.3 94 940 0.0050 0.0155 2.4614 0.8117 0.0103 2.2324 0.0154 0.0125 0.3 0.3 95 950 0.0050 0.0155 2.4769 0.8220 0.0103 2.2478 0.0154 0.0125 0.4 0.4 96 960 0.0050 0.0155 2.4924 0.8323 0.0103 2.2632 0.0154 0.0125 0.4 0.4 97 970 0.0050 0.0155 2.5079 0.8427 0.0104 2.2786 0.0154 0.0125 0.4 0.4 98 980 0.0050 0.0155 2.5234 0.8531 0.0104 2.2940 0.0154 0.0125 0.4 0.4 99 990 0.0050 0.0155 2.5389 0.8636 0.0105 2.3094 0.0154 0.0126 0.4 0.4 100 1000 0.0050 0.0155 2.5544 0.8741 0.0105 2.3248 0.0154 0.0126 0.4 0.4 101 1010 0.0040 0.0124 2.5668 0.8825 0.0084 2.3372 0.0123 0.0101 0.3 0.3 102 1020 0.0040 0.0124 2.5792 0.8909 0.0084 2.3495 0.0123 0.0101 0.3 0.3 103 1030 0.0040 0.0124 2.5916 0.8994 0.0085 2.3618 0.0123 0.0101 0.3 0.3 104 1040 0.0040 0.0124 2.6040 0.9078 0.0085 2.3742 0.0123 0.0101 0.3 0.3 105 1050 0.0040 0.0124 2.6164 0.9163 0.0085 2.3865 0.0123 0.0101 0.3 0.3 106 1060 0.0040 0.0124 2.6288 0.9249 0.0085 2.3988 0.0123 0.0101 0.3 0.3 107 1070 0.0040 0.0124 2.6412 0.9334 0.0085 2.4112 0.0123 0.0102 0.3 0.3 108 1080 0.0040 0.0124 2.6536 0.9419 0.0086 2.4235 0.0123 0.0102 0.3 0.3 109 1090 0.0040 0.0124 2.6660 0.9505 0.0086 2.4358 0.0123 0.0102 0.3 0.3 110 1100 0.0040 0.0124 2.6784 0.9591 0.0086 2.4482 0.0123 0.0102 0.3 0.3 111 1110 0.0040 0.0124 2.6908 0.9677 0.0086 2.4605 0.0123 0.0102 0.3 0.3 112 1120 0.0040 0.0124 2.7032 0.9764 0.0086 2.4728 0.0123 0.0102 0.3 0.3 113 1130 0.0040 0.0124 2.7156 0.9850 0.0087 2.4852 0.0123 0.0102 0.3 0.3 114 1140 0.0040 0.0124 2.7280 0.9937 0.0087 2.4975 0.0123 0.0102 0.3 0.3 115 1150 0.0040 0.0124 2.7404 1.0024 0.0087 2.5098 0.0123 0.0102 0.3 0.3 116 1160 0.0040 0.0124 2.7528 1.0111 0.0087 2.5222 0.0123 0.0103 0.3 0.3 117 1170 0.0040 0.0124 2.7652 1.0198 0.0087 2.5345 0.0123 0.0103 0.3 0.3 118 1180 0.0040 0.0124 2.7776 1.0286 0.0087 2.5469 0.0123 0.0103 0.3 0.3 119 1190 0.0040 0.0124 2.7900 1.0373 0.0088 2.5592 0.0123 0.0103 0.3 0.3 120 1200 0.0040 0.0124 2.8024 1.0461 0.0088 2.5715 0.0123 0.0103 0.3 0.3 121 1210 0.0040 0.0124 2.8148 1.0549 0.0088 2.5839 0.0123 0.0103 0.3 0.3 122 1220 0.0040 0.0124 2.8272 1.0637 0.0088 2.5962 0.0123 0.0103 0.3 0.3 123 1230 0.0040 0.0124 2.8396 1.0726 0.0088 2.6086 0.0123 0.0103 0.3 0.3 124 1240 0.0040 0.0124 2.8520 1.0814 0.0089 2.6209 0.0123 0.0103 0.3 0.3 125 1250 0.0040 0.0124 2.8644 1.0903 0.0089 2.6333 0.0123 0.0104 0.3 0.3 126 1260 0.0040 0.0124 2.8768 1.0992 0.0089 2.6456 0.0123 0.0104 0.3 0.3 127 1270 0.0040 0.0124 2.8892 1.1081 0.0089 2.6579 0.0123 0.0104 0.3 0.3 128 1280 0.0040 0.0124 2.9016 1.1170 0.0089 2.6703 0.0123 0.0104 0.3 0.3 129 1290 0.0040 0.0124 2.9140 1.1260 0.0089 2.6826 0.0123 0.0104 0.3 0.3 130 1300 0.0040 0.0124 2.9264 1.1349 0.0090 2.6950 0.0123 0.0104 0.3 0.3 131 1310 0.0040 0.0124 2.9388 1.1439 0.0090 2.7073 0.0123 0.0104 0.3 0.3 132 1320 0.0040 0.0124 2.9512 1.1529 0.0090 2.7197 0.0123 0.0104 0.3 0.3 133 1330 0.0040 0.0124 2.9636 1.1619 0.0090 2.7320 0.0123 0.0104 0.3 0.3 134 1340 0.0040 0.0124 2.9760 1.1709 0.0090 2.7444 0.0123 0.0104 0.3 0.3 135 1350 0.0040 0.0124 2.9884 1.1800 0.0090 2.7567 0.0123 0.0105 0.3 0.3 136 1360 0.0040 0.0124 3.0008 1.1891 0.0091 2.7691 0.0123 0.0105 0.3 0.3 137 1370 0.0040 0.0124 3.0132 1.1981 0.0091 2.7814 0.0123 0.0105 0.3 0.3 138 1380 0.0040 0.0124 3.0256 1.2072 0.0091 2.7938 0.0123 0.0105 0.3 0.3 139 1390 0.0040 0.0124 3.0380 1.2163 0.0091 2.8061 0.0123 0.0105 0.3 0.3 140 1400 0.0040 0.0124 3.0504 1.2254 0.0091 2.8185 0.0123 0.0105 0.3 0.3 141 1410 0.0040 0.0124 3.0628 1.2346 0.0091 2.8308 0.0124 0.0105 0.3 0.3 142 1420 0.0040 0.0124 3.0752 1.2437 0.0092 2.8432 0.0124 0.0105 0.3 0.3 143 1430 0.0040 0.0124 3.0876 1.2529 0.0092 2.8555 0.0124 0.0105 0.3 0.3 144 1440 0.0040 0.0124 3.1000 1.2621 0.0092 2.8679 0.0124 0.0105 0.3 0.3 Total 1.0000 3.1000 Hydrograph Volume 32586 (Cubic Feet) File: SBUH-24-post5.XLS 2111/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 3 0 CES INW SANTA BARBARA URBAN HYDROGRAPH SCS TYPE 1A 24-HOUR DISTRIBUTION Given: Area = 4:64 acres Pt = 3.45 inches dt = 10 min. Tc = 12 min. W = 0.2941 routing constant Pervious Area Impervious Area Area = 2.66 acres Area = 1.98 acres CN = 79 CN = 98 S = 2.66 S = 0.20 0.2S = 0.53 0.2S = 0.04 3.0 2.5 2.0 N U c 1.5 3 0 1.0 0.5 • Project: Tigard Baptist Church Project Number: 1845 Date: 2111105 Basin: Site Event: 10-year post HYDROGRAPH RESULTS Peak Runoff: 2.4 cfs Total Vol.: 37624 cf Peak Runoff Hydrograph 0.0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Time in Minutes 1200 1400 1600 File: SBUH-24-postlO.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 1 Pervious Area Impervious Area (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated fated mental lated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydro- ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (CIS) (cfs) 1 10 0.0040 0.0138 0.0138 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 2 20 0.0040 0.0138 0.0276 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 3 30 0.0040 0.0138 0.0414 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 4 40 0.0040 0.0138 0.0552 0.0000 0.0000 0.0009 0.0009 0.0004 0.0 0.0 5 50 0.0040 0.0138 0.0690 0.0000 0.0000 0.0034 0.0025 0.0011 0.0 0.0 6 60 0.0040 0.0138 0.0828 0.0000 0.0000 0.0072 0.0037 0.0016 0.0 0.0 7 70 0.0040 0.0138 0.0966 0.0000 0.0000 0.0120 0.0048 0.0021 0.1 0.0 8 80 0.0040 0.0138 0.1104 0.0000 0.0000 0.0177 0.0057 0.0024 0.1 0.1 9 90 0.0040 0.0138 0.1242 0.0000 0.0000 0.0242 0.0065 0.0028 0.1 0.1 10 100 0.0040 0.0138 0.1380 0.0000 0.0000 0.0313 0.0072 0.0031 0.1 0.1 11 110 0.0050 0.0173 0.1553 0.0000 0.0000 0.0411 0.0098 0.0042 0.1 0.1 12 120 0.0050 0.0173 0.1725 0.0000 0.0000 0.0516 0.0105 0.0045 0.1 0.1 13 130 0.0050 0.0173 0.1898 0.0000 0.0000 0.0628 0.0112 0.0048 0.1 0.1 14 140 0.0050 0.0173 0.2070 0.0000 0.0000 0.0746 0.0118 0.0050 0.1 0.1 15 150 0.0050 0.0173 0.2243 0.0000 0.0000 0.0868 0.0122 0.0052 0.1 0.1 16 160 0.0050 0.0173 0.2415 0.0000 0.0000 0.0995 0.0127 0.0054 0.2 0.1 17 170 0.0060 0.0207 0.2622 0.0000 0.0000 0.1152 0.0157 0.0067 0.2 0.2 18 180 0.0060 0.0207 0.2829 0.0000 0.0000 0.1314 0.0162 0.0069 0.2 0.2 19 190 0.0060 0.0207 0.3036 0.0000 0.0000 0.1479 0.0166 0.0071 0.2 0.2 20 200 0.0060 0.0207 0.3243 0.0000 0.0000 0.1648 0.0169 0.0072 0.2 0.2 21 210 0.0060 0.0207 0.3450 0.0000 0.0000 0.1820 0.0172 0.0073 0.2 0.2 22 220 0.0060 0.0207 0.3657 0.0000 0.0000 0.1995 0.0175 0.0075 0.2 0.2 23 230 0.0070 0.0242 0.3899 0.0000 0.0000 0.2203 0.0207 0.0088 0.2 0.2 24 240 0.0070 0.0242 0.4140 0.0000 0.0000 0.2413 0.0210 0.0090 0.3 0.2 25 250 0.0070 0.0242 0.4382 0.0000 0.0000 0.2625 0.0213 0.0091 0.3 0.2 26 260 0.0070 0.0242 0.4623 0.0000 0.0000 0.2840 0.0215 0.0092 0.3 0.3 27 270 0.0070 0.0242 0.4865 0.0000 0.0000 0.3057 0.0217 0.0092 0.3 0.3 28 280 0.0070 0.0242 0.5106 0.0000 0.0000 0.3275 0.0219 0.0093 0.3 0.3 29 290 0.0082 0.0283 0.5389 0.0000 0.0000 0.3533 0.0258 0.0110 0.3 0.3 30 300 0.0082 0.0283 0.5672 0.0005 0.0004 0.3793 0.0260 0.0113 0.3 0.3 31 310 0.0082 0.0283 0.5955 0.0015 0.0010 0.4055 0.0262 0.0118 0.3 0.3 32 320 0.0082 0.0283 0.6238 0.0031 0.0016 0.4318 0.0263 0.0121 0.3 0.3 33 330 0.0082 0.0283 0.6521 0.0052 0.0021 0.4582 0.0265 0.0125 0.4 0.3 34 340 0.0082 0.0283 0.6803 0.0079 0.0027 0.4848 0.0266 0.0129 0.4 0.3 35 350 0.0095 0.0328 0.7131 0.0116 0.0037 0.5157 0.0309 0.0153 0.4 0.4 36 360 0.0095 0.0328 0.7459 0.0160 0.0044 0.5468 0.0311 0.0158 0.4 0.4 37 370 0.0095 0.0328 0.7787 0.0210 0.0050 0.5780 0.0312 0.0162 0.5 0.4 38 380 0.0095 0.0328 0.8114 0.0266 0.0056 0.6093 0.0313 0.0166 0.5 0.4 39 390 0.0095 0.0328 0.8442 0.0329 0.0062 0.6407 0.0314 0.0170 0.5 0.5 40 400 0.0095 0.0328 0.8770 0.0397 0.0068 0.6721 0.0315 0.0173 0.5 0.5 41 410 0.0134 0.0462 0.9232 0.0503 0.0106 0.7167 0.0445 0.0251 0.7 0.5 42 420 0.0134 0.0462 0.9695 0.0619 0.0116 0.7613 0.0447 0.0257 0.7 0.6 43 430 0.0134 0.0462 1.0157 0.0746 0.0127 0.8061 0.0448 0.0264 0.7 0.7 44 440 0.0180 0.0621 1.0778 0.0931 0.0185 0.8664 0.0603 0.0364 1.0 0.8 45 450 0.0180 0.0621 1.1399 0.1133 0.0202 0.9269 0.0605 0.0374 1.0 0.9 46 460 0.0340 0.1173 1.2572 0.1556 0.0423 1.0416 0.1147 0.0732 2.1 1.3 47 470 0.0540 0.1863 1.4435 0.2329 0.0773 1.2245 0.1829 0.1224 3.4 2.1 48 480 0.0270 0.0932 1.5366 0.2757 0.0428 1.3162 0.0917 0.0637 1.8 2.4 49 490 0.0180 0.0621 1.5987 0.3057 0.0299 1.3775 0.0612 0.0433 1.2 1.9 50 500 0.0134 0.0462 1.6450 0.3286 0.0230 1.4231 0.0456 0.0326 0.9 1.4 51 510 0.0134 0.0462 1.6912 0.3522 0.0235 1.4688 0.0457 0.0330 0.9 1.1 52 520 0.0134 0.0462 1.7374 0.3763 0.0241 1.5144 0.0457 0.0333 0.9 1.0 53 530 0.0088 0.0304 1.7678 0.3924 0.0161 1.5445 0.0300 0.0220 0.6 0.9 54 540 0.0088 0.0304 1.7981 0.4087 0.0163 1.5745 0.0300 0.0222 0.6 0.7 55 550 0.0088 0.0304 1.8285 0.4252 0.0165 1.6045 0.0300 0.0223 0.6 0.7 56 560 0.0088 0.0304 1.8589 0.4420 0.0168 1.6346 0.0300 0.0224 0.6 0.6 57 570 0.0088 0.0304 1.8892 0.4589 0.0170 1.6646 0.0301 0.0225 0.6 0.6 58 580 0.0088 0.0304 1.9196 0.4761 0.0172 1.6947 0.0301 0.0227 0.6 0.6 59 590 0.0088 0.0304 1.9499 0.4934 0.0174 1.7248 0.0301 0.0228 0.6 0.6 60 600 0.0088 0.0304 1.9803 0.5110 0.0175 1.7548 0.0301 0.0229 0.6 0.6 61 610 0.0088 0.0304 2.0107 0.5287 0.0177 1.7849 0.0301 0.0230 0.6 0.6 62 620 0.0088 0.0304 2.0410 0.5466 0.0179 1.8150 0.0301 0.0231 0.6 0.6 63 630 0.0088 0.0304 2.0714 0.5647 0.0181 1.8451 0.0301 0.0232 0.7 0.6 64 640 0.0088 0.0304 2.1017 0.5830 0.0183 1.8752 0.0301 0.0233 0.7 0.7 65 650 0.0072 0.0248 2.1266 0.5981 0.0151 1.8999 0.0246 0.0192 0.5 0.6 66 660 0.0072 0.0248 2.1514 0.6133 0.0152 1.9245 0.0246 0.0192 0.5 0.6 67 670 0.0072 0.0248 2.1763 0.6286 0.0153 1.9492 0.0246 0.0193 0.5 0.6 68 680 0.0072 0.0248 2.2011 0.6440 0.0154 1.9738 0.0247 0.0194 0.5 0.5 69 690 0.0072 0.0248 2.2259 0.6595 0.0155 1.9985 0.0247 0.0194 0.5 0.5 70 700 0.0072 0.0248 2.2508 0.6752 0.0156 2.0231 0.0247 0.0195 0.5 0.5 71 710 0.0072 0.0248 2.2756 0.6909 0.0157 2.0478 0.0247 0.0195 0.5 0.5 File: SBUH-24-postlO.XLS 2/1112005 CESINW, Inc. Page2 0 • (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated lated mental lated mental Runoff Hydra Hydro- ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (cfs) (cfs) 72 720 0.0072 0.0248 2.3005 0.7067 0.0158 2.0725 0.0247 0.0196 0.6 0.5 73 730 0.0072 0.0248 2.3253 0.7227 0.0159 2.0971 0.0247 0.0197 0.6 0.6 74 740 0.0072 0.0248 2.3501 0.7387 0.0160 2.1218 0.0247 0.0197 0.6 0.6 75 750 0.0072 0.0248 2.3750 0.7548 0.0161 2.1465 0.0247 0.0198 0.6 0.6 76 760 0.0072 0.0248 2.3998 0.7710 0.0162 2.1712 0.0247 0.0198 0.6 0.6 77 770 0.0057 0.0197 2.4195 0.7840 0.0129 2.1907 0.0195 0.0157 0.4 0.5 78 780 0.0057 0.0197 2.4392 0.7969 0.0130 2.2103 0.0195 0.0158 0.4 0.5 79 790 0.0057 0.0197 2.4588 0.8100 0.0130 2.2298 0.0195 0.0158 0.4 0.5 80 800 0.0057 0.0197 2.4785 0.8230 0.0131 2.2493 - 0.0195 0.0158 0.4 0.4 81 810 0.0057 0.0197 2.4981 0.8362 0.0131 2.2689 0.0195 0.0159 0.4 0.4 82 820 0.0057 0.0197 2.5178 0.8494 0.0132 2.2884 0.0196 0.0159 0.4 0.4 83 830 0.0057 0.0197 2.5375 0.8626 0.0133 2.3080 0.0196 0.0159 0.4 0.4 84 840 0.0057 0.0197 2.5571 0.8759 0.0133 2.3276 0.0196 0.0160 0.4 0.4 85 850 0.0057 0.0197 2.5768 0.8893 0.0134 2.3471 0.0196 0.0160 0.4 0.4 86 860 0.0057 0.0197 2.5965 0.9027 0.0134 2.3667 0.0196 0.0160 0.5 0.4 87 870 0.0057 0.0197 2.6161 0.9162 0.0135 2.3862 0.0196 0.0161 0.5 0.4 88 880 0.0057 0.0197 2.6358 0.9297 0.0135 2.4058 0.0196 0.0161 0.5 0.5 89 890 0.0050 0.0173 2.6531 0.9416 0.0119 2.4229 0.0172 0.0141 0.4 0.4 90 900 0.0050 0.0173 2.6703 0.9535 0.0119 2.4401 0.0172 0.0142 0.4 0.4 91 910 0.0050 0.0173 2.6876 0.9655 0.0120 2.4573 0.0172 0.0142 0.4 0.4 92 920 0.0050 0.0173 2.7048 0.9775 0.0120 2.4744 0.0172 0.0142 0.4 0.4 93 930 0.0050 0.0173 2.7221 0.9895 0.0120 2.4916 0.0172 0.0142 0.4 0.4 94 940 0.0050 0.0173 2.7393 1.0016 0.0121 2.5088 0.0172 0.0143 0.4 0.4 95 950 0.0050 0.0173 2.7566 1.0137 0.0121 2.5259 0.0172 0.0143 0.4 0.4 96 960 0.0050 0.0173 2.7738 1.0259 0.0122 2.5431 0.0172 0.0143 0.4 0.4 97 970 0.0050 0.0173 2.7911 1.0381 0.0122 2.5602 0.0172 0.0143 0.4 0.4 98 980 0.0050 0.0173 2.8083 1.0503 0.0122 2.5774 0.0172 0.0143 0.4 0.4 99 990 0.0050 0.0173 2.8256 1.0626 0.0123 2.5946 0.0172 0.0144 0.4 0.4 100 1000 0.0050 0.0173 2.8428 1.0749 0.0123 2.6118 0.0172 0.0144 0.4 0.4 101 1010 0.0040 0.0138 2.8566 1.0847 0.0099 2.6255 0.0137 0.0115 0.3 0.4 102 1020 0.0040 0.0138 2.8704 1.0946 0.0099 2.6392 0.0137 0.0115 0.3 0.3 103 1030 0.0040 0.0138 2.8842 1.1045 0.0099 2.6530 0.0137 0.0115 0.3 0.3 104 1040 0.0040 0.0138 2.8980 1.1144 0.0099 2.6667 0.0137 0.0116 0.3 0.3 105 1050 0.0040 0.0138 2.9118 1.1244 0.0099 2.6804 0.0137 0.0116 0.3 0.3 106 1060 0.0040 0.0138 2.9256 1.1344 0.0100 2.6942 0.0137 0.0116 0.3 0.3 107 1070 0.0040 0.0138 2.9394 1.1444 0.0100 2.7079 0.0137 0.0116 0.3 0.3 108 1080 0.0040 0.0138 2.9532 1.1544 0.0100 2.7217 0.0137 0.0116 0.3 0.3 109 1090 0.0040 0.0138 2.9670 1.1644 0.0100 2.7354 0.0137 0.0116 0.3 0.3 110 1100 0.0040 0.0138 2.9808 1.1744 0.0101 2.7491 0.0137 0.0116 0.3 0.3 111 1110 0.0040 0.0138 2.9946 1.1845 0.0101 2.7629 0.0137 0.0116 0.3 0.3 112 1120 0.0040 0.0138 3.0084 1.1946 0.0101 2.7766 0.0137 -0.0116 0.3 0.3 113 1130 0.0040 0.0138 3.0222 1.2047 0.0101 2.7904 0.0137 0.0117 0.3 0.3 114 1140 0.0040 0.0138 3.0360 1.2149 0.0101 2.8041 0.0137 0.0117 0.3 0.3 115 1150 0.0040 0.0138 3.0498 1.2250 0.0102 2.8179 0.0137 0.0117 0.3 0.3 116 1160 0.0040 0.0138 3.0636 1.2352 0.0102 2.8316 0.0137 0.0117 0.3 0.3 117 1170 0.0040 0.0138 3.0774 1.2454 0.0102 2.8454 0.0137 0.0117 0.3 0.3 118 1180 0.0040 0.0138 3.0912 1.2556 0.0102 2.8591 0.0137 0.0117 0.3 0.3 119 1190 0.0040 0.0138 3.1050 1.2658 0.0102 2.8728 0.0137 0.0117 0.3 0.3 120 1200 0.0040 0.0138 3.1188 1.2760 0.0102 2.8866 0.0137 0.0117 0.3 0.3 121 1210 0.0040 0.0138 3.1326 1.2863 0.0103 2.9003 0.0137 0.0118 0.3 0.3 122 1220 0.0040 0.0138 3.1464 1.2966 0.0103 2.9141 0.0137 0.0118 0.3 0.3 123 1230 0.0040 0.0138 3.1602 1.3069 0.0103 2.9278 0.0137 0.0118 0.3 0.3 124 1240 0.0040 0.0138 3.1740 1.3172 0.0103 2.9416 0.0137 0.0118 0.3 0.3 125 1250 0.0040 0.0138 3.1878 1.3276 0.0103 2.9553 0.0137 0.0118 0.3 0.3 126 1260 0.0040 0.0138 3.2016 1.3379 0.0104 2.9691 0.0137 0.0118 0.3 0.3 127 1270 0.0040 0.0138 3.2154 1.3483 0.0104 2.9828 0.0137 0.0118 0.3 0.3 128 1280 0.0040 0.0138 3.2292 1.3587 0.0104 2.9966 0.0137 0.0118 0.3 0.3 129 1290 0.0040 0.0138 3.2430 1.3691 0.0104 3.0103 0.0138 0.0118 0.3 0.3 130 1300 0.0040 0.0138 3.2568 1.3795 0.0104 3.0241 0.0138 0.0118 0.3 0.3 131 1310 0.0040 0.0138 3.2706 1.3900 0.0104 3.0378 0.0138 0.0119 0.3 0.3 132 1320 0.0040 0.0138 3.2844 1.4004 0.0105 3.0516 0.0138 0.0119 0.3 0.3 133 1330 0.0040 0.0138 3.2982 1.4109 0.0105 3.0653 0.0138 0.0119 0.3 0.3 134 1340 0.0040 0.0138 3.3120 1.4214 0.0105 3.0791 0.0138 0.0119 0.3 0.3 135 1350 0.0040 0.0138 3.3258 1.4319 0.0105 3.0928 0.0138 0.0119 0.3 0.3 136 1360 0.0040 0.0138 3.3396 1.4424 0.0105 3.1066 0.0138 0.0119 0.3 0.3 137 1370 0.0040 0.0138 3.3534 1.4530 0.0105 3.1203 0.0138 0.0119 0.3 0.3 138 1380 0.0040 0.0138 3.3672 1.4635 0.0106 3.1341 0.0138 0.0119 0.3 0.3 139 1390 0.0040 0.0138 3.3810 1.4741 0.0106 3.1479 0.0138 0.0119 0.3 0.3 140 1400 0.0040 0.0138 3.3948 1.4847 0.0106 3.1616 0.0138 0.0119 0.3 0.3 141 1410 0.0040 0.0138 3.4086 1.4953 0.0106 3.1754 0.0138 0.0120 0.3 0.3 142 1420 0.0040 0.0138 3.4224 1.5059 0.0106 3.1891 0.0138 0.0120 0.3 0.3 143 1430 0.0040 0.0138 3.4362 1.5166 0.0106 3.2029 0.0138 0.0120 0.3 0.3 144 1440 0.0040 0.0138 3.4500 1.5272 0.0107 3.2166 0.0138 0.0120 0.3 0.3 Total 1.0000 3.4500 Hydrograph Volume 37624 (Cubic Feet) File: SBUH-24-postlO.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 3 0 0 CESINW Project: Tigard Baptist Church Project Number. 1845 SANTA BARBARA URBAN HYDROGRAPH Date: 2111105 SCS TYPE 1A 24-HOUR DISTRIBUTION Basin: Site Event: 25-year post Given: Area = 4.64 acres Pt = 3.9 inches dt = 10 min. Tc = 11 min. W = 0.3125 routing constant Pervious Area Impervious Area HYDRO GRAPH RESULTS Area = 2.66 acres Area = 1.98 acres Peak Runoff: 2.9 cfs CN = 79 CN = 98 Total Vol.: 44266 cf S = 2.66 S = 0.20 0.2S = 0:53 0.2S = 0.04 Peak Runoff Hydrograph 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 V 3 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Time in Minutes File: SBUH-24-post25.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 1 0 • (1) Time Incre- ment (2) Time (Min) (3) Rainfall Distri- bution of Pt) (4) Incre- mental Rainfall (in) (5) Accumu- lated Rainfall (in) Pervious Area (6) (7) Accumu- Incre- lated mental Runoff Runoff (in) (in) Impervious Area (8) (9) Accumu- Incre- lated mental Runoff Runoff (in) (in) (10) Total Runoff (in) (11) Instant Hydro- graph (cfs) (12) Design Hydra graph (cfs) 1 10 0.0040 0.0156 0.0156 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 2 20 0.0040 0.0156 0.0312 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0 0.0 3 30 0.0040 0.0156 0.0468 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0002 0.0001 0.0 0.0 4 40 0.0040 0.0156 0.0624 0.0000 0.0000 0.0021 0.0019 0.0008 0.0 0.0 5 50 0.0040 0.0156 0.0780 0.0000 0.0000 0.0057 0.0037 0.0016 0.0 0.0 6 60 0.0040 0.0156 0.0936 0.0000 0.0000 0.0108 0.0051 0.0022 0.1 0.0 7 70 0.0040 0.0156 0.1092 0.0000 0.0000 0.0172 ' 0.0063 0.0027 0.1 0.1 8 80 0.0040 0.0156 0.1248 0.0000 0.0000 0.0245 0.0073 0.0031 0.1 0.1 9 90 0.0040 0.0156 0.1404 0.0000 0.0000 0.0327 0.0082 0.0035 0.1 0.1 10 100 0.0040 0.0156 0.1560 0.0000 0.0000 0.0416 0.0089 0.0038 0.1 0.1 11 110 0.0050 0.0195 0.1755 0.0000 0.0000 0.0535 0.0120 0.0051 0.1 0.1 12 120 0.0050 0.0195 0.1950 0.0000 0.0000 0.0664 0.0128 0.0055 0.2 0.1 13 130 0.0050 0.0195 0.2145 0.0000 0.0000 0.0799 0.0135 0.0058 0.2 0.1 14 140 0.0050 0.0195 0.2340 0.0000 0.0000 0.0939 0.0141 0.0060 0.2 0.2 15 150 0.0050 0.0195 0.2535 0.0000 0.0000 0.1085 0.0146 0.0062 0.2 0.2 16 160 0.0050 0.0195 0.2730 0.0000 0.0000 0.1236 0.0150 0.0064 0.2 0.2 17 170 0.0060 0.0234 0.2964 0.0000 0.0000 0.1421 0.0185 0.0079 0.2 0.2 18 180 0.0060 0.0234 0.3198 0.0000 0.0000 0.1611 0.0190 0.0081 0.2 0.2 19 190 0.0060 0.0234 0.3432 0.0000 0.0000 0.1805 0.0194 0.0083 0.2 0.2 20 200 0.0060 0.0234 0.3666 0.0000 0.0000 0.2003 0.0198 0.0084 0.2 0.2 21 210 0.0060 0.0234 0.3900 0.0000 0.0000 0.2204 0.0201 0.0086 0.2 0.2 22 220 0.0060 0.0234 0.4134 0.0000 0.0000 0.2407 0.0203 0.0087 0.2 0.2 23 230 0.0070 0.0273 0.4407 0.0000 0.0000 0.2648 0.0240 0.0103 0.3 0.3 24 240 0.0070 0.0273 0.4680 0.0000 0.0000 0.2891 0.0243 0.0104 0.3 0.3 25 250 0.0070 0.0273 0.4953 0.0000 0.0000 0.3136 0.0246 0.0105 0.3 0.3 26 260 0.0070 0.0273 0.5226 0.0000 0.0000 0.3384 0.0248 0.0106 0.3 0.3 27 270 0.0070 0.0273 0.5499 0.0001 0.0001 0.3634 0.0250 0.0107 0.3 0.3 28 280 0.0070 0.0273 0.5772 0.0008 0.0006 0.3885 0.0251 0.0111 0.3 0.3 29 290 0.0082 0.0320 0.6092 0.0022 0.0014 0.4182 0.0297 0.0135 0.4 0.3 30 300 0.0082 0.0320 0.6412 0.0043 0.0021 0.4480 0.0298 0.0140 0.4 0.4 31 310 0.0082 0.0320 0.6731 0.0072 0.0028 0.4780 0.0300 0.0144 0.4 0.4 32 320 0.0082 0.0320 0.7051 0.0106 0.0035 0.5082 0.0301 0.0149 0.4 0.4 33 330 0.0082 0.0320 0.7371 0.0147 0.0041 0.5385 0.0303 0.0153 0.4 0.4 34 340 0.0082 0.0320 0.7691 0.0195 0.0047 0.5689 0.0304 0.0157 0.4 0.4 35 350 0.0095 0.0371 0.8061 0.0257 0.0062 0.6042 0.0353 0.0186 0.5 0.5 36 360 0.0095 0.0371 0.8432 0.0327 0.0070 0.6397 0.0355 0.0191 0.5 0.5 37 370 0.0095 0.0371 0.8802 0.0404 0.0077 0.6752 0.0356 0.0196 0.6 0.5 38 380 0.0095 0.0371 0.9173 0.0489 0.0084 0.7109 0.0357 0.0201 0.6 0.5 39 390 0.0095 0:0371 0.9543 0.0580 0.0091 0.7467 0.0358 0.0205 0.6 0.6 40 400 0.0095 0.0371 0.9914 0.0678 0.0098 0.7826 0.0359 0.0209 0.6 0.6 41 410 0.0134 0.0523 1.0436 0.0827 0.0149 0.8333 0.0507 0.0302 0.8 0.7 42 420 0.0134 0.0523 1.0959 0.0988 0.0161 0.8841 0.0508 0.0309 0.9 0.8 43 430 0.0134 0.0523 1.1482 0.1161 0.0173 0.9350 0.0509 0.0316 0.9 0.8 44 440 0.0180 0.0702 1.2184 0.1410 0.0249 1.0036 0.0686 0.0436 1.2 1.0 45 450 0.0180 0.0702 1.2886 0.1678 0.0268 1.0723 0.0687 0.0447 1.3 1.1 46 460 0.0340 0.1326 1.4212 0.2230 0.0553 1.2025 0.1302 0.0872 2.4 1.6 47 470 0.0540 0.2106 1.6318 0.3220 0.0990 1.4101 0.2075 0.1453 4.1 2.6 48 480 0.0270 0.1053 1.7371 0.3761 0.0541 1.5141 0.1040 0.0754 2.1 2.9 49 490 0.0180 0.0702 1.8073 0.4136 0.0376 1.5835 0.0694 0.0512 1.4 2.2 50 500 0.0134 0.0523 1.8595 0.4423 0.0287 1.6352 0.0517 0.0385 1.1 1.6 51 510 0.0134 0.0523 1.9118 0.4717 0.0293 1.6870 0.0517 0.0389 1.1 1.3 52 520 0.0134 0.0523 1.9640 0.5016 0.0299 1.7387 0.0518 0.0392 1.1 1.2 53 530 0.0088 0.0343 1.9984 0.5215 0.0199 1.7727 0.0340 0.0259 0.7 1.0 54 540 0.0088 0.0343 2.0327 0.5417 0.0202 1.8067 0.0340 0.0261 0.7 0.8 55 550 0.0088 0.0343 2.0670 0.5621 0.0204 1.8408 0.0340 0.0262 0.7 0.8 56 560 0.0088 0.0343 2.1013 0.5828 0.0206 1.8748 0.0340 0.0264 0.7 0.8 57 570 0.0088 0.0343 2.1356 0.6036 0.0209 1.9089 0.0340 0.0265 0.7 0.7 58 580 0.0088 0.0343 2.1700 0.6247 0.0211 1.9429 0.0341 0.0266 0.7 0.7 59 590 0.0088 0.0343 2.2043 0.6460 0.0213 1.9770 0.0341 0.0267 0.8 0.7 60 600 0.0088 0.0343 2.2386 0.6675 0.0215 2.0110 0.0341 0.0269 0.8 0.8 61 610 0.0088 0.0343 2.2729 0.6892 0.0217 2.0451 0.0341 0.0270 0.8 0.8 62 620 0.0088 0.0343 2.3072 0.7111 0.0219 2.0792 0.0341 0.0271 0.8 0.8 63 630 0.0088 0.0343 2.3416 0.7331 0.0221 2.1133 0.0341 0.0272 0.8 0.8 64 640 0.0088 0.0343 2.3759 0.7554 0.0223 2.1474 0.0341 0.0273 0.8 0.8 65 650 0.0072 0.0281 2.4040 0.7738 0.0184 2.1753 0.0279 0.0224 0.6 0.7 66 660 0.0072 0.0281 2.4320 0.7922 0.0185 2.2032 0.0279 0.0225 0.6 0.7 67 670 0.0072 0.0281 2.4601 0.8108 0.0186 2.2311 0.0279 0.0226 0.6 0.6 68 680 0.0072 0.0281 2.4882 0.8295 0.0187 2.2590 0.0279 0.0226 0.6 0.6 69 690 0.0072 0.0281 2.5163 0.8484 0.0188 2.2869 0.0279 0.0227 0.6 0.6 70 700 0.0072 0.0281 2.5444 0.8673 0.0189 2.3148 0.0279 0.0228 0.6 0.6 71 710 0.0072 0.0281 2.5724 0.8863 0.0190 2.3428 0.0279 0.0228 0.6 0.6 File: SBUH-24-post25.XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 2 r • (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incre- Accumu- Accumu- Incre- Accumu- Incre- Total Instant Design Incre- Distri- mental lated lated mental lated mental Runoff Hydro- Hydro- ment bution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff graph graph (Min) of Pt) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (cis) (cfs) 72 720 0.0072 0.0281 2.6005 0.9055 0.0191 2.3707 0.0279 0.0229 0.6 0.6 73 730 0.0072 0.0281 2.6286 0.9247 0.0193 2.3986 0.0279 0.0230 0.6 0.6 74 740 0.0072 0.0281 2.6567 0.9441 0.0194 2.4266 0.0279 0.0230 0.6 0.6 75 750 0.0072 0.0281 2.6848 0.9635 0.0195 2.4545 0.0279 0.0231 0.6 0.6 76 760 0.0072 0.0281 2.7128 0.9831 0.0196 2.4824 0.0279 0.0231 0.6 0.6 77 770 0.0057 0.0222 2.7351 0.9986 0.0156 2.5045 0.0221 0.0184 0.5 0.6 78 780 0.0057 0.0222 2.7573 1.0143 0.0156 2.5267 0.0221 0.0184 0.5 0.5 79 790 0.0057 0.0222 2.7795 1.0299 0.0157 2.5488 0.0221 0.0184 0.5 0.5 80 800 0.0057 0.0222 2.8018 1.0457 0.0157 2.5709 0.0221 0.0185 0.5 0.5 81 810 0.0057 0.0222 2.8240 1.0615 0.0158 2.5930 0.0221 0.0185 0.5 0.5 82 820 0.0057 0.0222 2.8462 1.0773 0.0158 2.6152 0.0221 0.0185 0.5 0.5 83 830 0.0057 0.0222 2.8685 1.0932 0.0159 2.6373 0.0221 0.0186 0.5 0.5 84 840 0.0057 0.0222 2.8907 1.1092 0.0160 2.6594 0.0221 0.0186 0.5 0.5 85 850 0.0057 0.0222 2.9129 1.1252 0.0160 2.6816 0.0221 0.0186 0.5 0.5 86 860 0.0057 0.0222 2.9351 1.1413 0.0161 2.7037 0.0221 0.0187 0.5 0.5 87 870 0.0057 0.0222 2.9574 1.1574 0.0161 2.7258 0.0221 0.0187 0.5 0.5 88 880 0.0057 0.0222 2.9796 1.1736 0.0162 2.7480 0.0221 0.0187 0.5 0.5 89 890 0.0050 0.0195 2.9991 1.1878 0.0142 2.7674 0.0194 0.0164 0.5 0.5 90 900 0.0050 0.0195 3.0186 1.2021 0.0143 2.7868 0.0194 0.0165 0.5 0.5 91 910 0.0050 0.0195 3.0381 1.2164 0.0143 2.8062 0.0194 0.0165 0.5 0.5 92 920 0.0050 0.0195 3.0576 1.2308 0.0144 2.8256 0.0194 0.0165 0.5 0.5 93 930 0.0050 0.0195 3.0771 1.2451 0.0144 2.8451 0.0194 0.0165 0.5 0.5 94 940 0.0050 0.0195 3.0966 1.2596 0.0144 2.8645 0.0194 0.0166 0.5 0.5 95 950 0.0050 0.0195 3.1161 1.2740 0.0145 2.8839 0.0194 0.0166 0.5 0.5 96 960 0.0050 0.0195 3.1356 1.2885 0.0145 2.9033 0.0194 0.0166 0.5 0.5 97 970 0.0050 0.0195 3.1551 1.3031 0.0145 2.9228 0.0194 0.0166 0.5 0.5 98 980 0.0050 0.0195 3.1746 1.3177 0.0146 2.9422 0.0194 0.0166 0.5 0.5 99 990 0.0050 0.0195 3.1941 1.3323 0.0146 2.9616 0.0194 0.0167 0.5 0.5 100 1000 0.0050 0.0195 3.2136 1.3469 0.0147 2.9810 0.0194 0.0167 0.5 0.5 101 1010 0.0040 0.0156 3.2292 1.3587 0.0117 2.9966 0.0155 0.0134 0.4 0.4 102 1020 0.0040 0.0156 3.2448 1.3704 0.0118 3.0121 0.0155 0.0134 0.4 0.4 103 1030 0.0040 0.0156 3.2604 1.3822 0.0118 3.0277 0.0155 0.0134 0.4 0.4 104 1040 0.0040 0.0156 3.2760 1.3941 0.0118 3.0432 0.0155 0.0134 0.4 0.4 105 1050 0.0040 0.0156 3.2916 1.4059 0.0118 3.0588 0.0155 0.0134 0.4 0.4 106 1060 0.0040 0.0156 3.3072 1.4177 0.0119 3.0743 0.0155 0.0134 0.4 0.4 107 1070 0.0040 0.0156 3.3228 1.4296 0.0119 3.0898 0.0155 0.0134 0.4 0.4 108 1080 0.0040 0.0156 3.3384 1.4415 0.0119 3.1054 0.0155 0.0135 0.4 0.4 109 1090 0.0040 0.0156 3.3540 1.4534 0.0119 3.1209 0.0155 0.0135 0.4 0.4 110 1100 0.0040 0.0156 3.3696 1.4654 0.0119 3.1365 0.0155 0.0135 0.4 0.4 111 1110 0.0040 0.0156 3.3852 1.4773 0.0120 3.1520 0.0155 0.0135 0.4 0.4 112 1120 0.0040 0.0156 3.4008 1.4893 0.0120 3.1676 0.0155 0.0135 0.4 0.4 113 1130 0.0040 0.0156 3.4164 1.5013 0.0120 3.1831 0.0155 0.0135 0.4 0.4 114 1140 0.0040 0.0156 3.4320 1.5133 0.0120 3.1987 0.0155 0.0135 0.4 0.4 115 1150 0.0040 0.0156 3.4476 1.5254 0.0120 3.2142 0.0155 0.0135 0.4 0.4 116 1160 0.0040 0.0156 3.4632 1.5375 0.0121 3.2298 0.0156 0.0136 0.4 0.4 117 1170 0.0040 0.0156 3.4788 1.5495 0.0121 3.2453 0.0156 0.0136 0.4 0.4 118 1180 0.0040 0.0156 3.4944 1.5616 0.0121 3.2609 0.0156 0.0136 0.4 0.4 119 1190 0.0040 0.0156 3.5100 1.5738 0.0121 3.2764 0.0156 0.0136 0.4 0.4 120 1200 0.0040 0.0156 3.5256 1.5859 0.0121 3.2920 0.0156 0.0136 0.4 0.4 121 1210 0.0040 0.0156 3.5412 1.5981 0.0122 3.3075 0.0156 0.0136 0.4 0.4 122 1220 0.0040 0.0156 3.5568 1.6102 0.0122 3.3231 0.0156 0.0136 0.4 0.4 123 1230 0.0040 0.0156 3.5724 1.6224 0.0122 3.3387 0.0156 0.0136 0.4 0.4 124 1240 0.0040 0.0156 3.5880 1.6346 0.0122 3.3542 0.0156 0.0136 0.4 0.4 125 1250 0.0040 0.0156 3.6036 1.6469 0.0122 3.3698 0.0156 0.0137 0.4 0.4 126 1260 0.0040 0.0156 3.6192 1.6591 0.0123 3.3853 0.0156 0.0137 0.4 0.4 127 1270 0.0040 0.0156 3.6348 1.6714 0.0123 3.4009 0.0156 0.0137 0.4 0.4 128 1280 0.0040 0.0156 3.6504 1.6837 0.0123 3.4164 0.0156 0.0137 0.4 0.4 129 1290 0.0040 0.0156 3.6660 1.6960 0.0123 3.4320 0.0156 0.0137 0.4 0.4 130 1300 0.0040 0.0156 3.6816 1.7083 0.0123 3.4475 0.0156 0.0137 0.4 0.4 131 1310 0.0040 0.0156 3.6972 1.7207 0.0123 3.4631 0.0156 n n1 17 n e n e 132 1320 0.0040 0.0156 3.7128 1.7330 0.0124 3.4786 0.0156 0.0137 0.4 0.4 133 1330 0.0040 0.0156 3.7284 1.7454 0.0124 3.4942 0.0156 0.0137 0.4 0.4 134 1340 0.0040 0.0156 3.7440 1.7578 0.0124 3.5098 0.0156 0.0137 0.4 0.4 135 1350 0.0040 0.0156 3.7596 1.7702 0.0124 3.5253 0.0156 0.0138 0.4 0.4 136 1360 0.0040 0.0156 3.7752 1.7826 0.0124 3.5409 0.0156 0.0138 0.4 0.4 137 1370 0.0040 0.0156 3.7908 1.7951 0.0124 3.5564 0.0156 0.0138 0.4 0.4 138 1380 0.0040 0.0156 3.8064 1.8075 0.0125 3.5720 0.0156 0.0138 0.4 0.4 139 1390 0.0040 0.0156 3.8220 1.8200 0.0125 3.5876 0.0156 0.0138 0.4 0.4 140 1400 0.0040 0.0156 3.8376 1.8325 0.0125 3.6031 0.0156 0.0138 0.4 0.4 141 1410 0.0040 0.0156 3.8532 1.8450 0.0125 3.6187 0.0156 0.0138 0.4 0.4 142 1420 0.0040 0.0156 3.8688 1.8575 0.0125 3.6342 0.0156 0.0138 0.4 0.4 143 1430 0.0040 0.0156 3.8844 1.8701 0.0125 3.6498 0.0156 0.0138 0.4 0.4 144 1440 0.0040 0.0156 3.9000 1.8826 0.0126 3.6654 0.0156 0.0138 0.4 0.4 Total 1.0000 3.9000 Hydrograph Volume 44266 (Cubic Feet) File: SBUH-24-post25. XLS 2/11/2005 CESINW, Inc. Page 3 NON-RESIDENTIAL fff.AP. MG DT= WMFW--IW-- APPLICANT: Ancl► ~P - LA AGENT: / ,rrrNEuJ /'~irT.~x3J Phone: (s,-,,) g 3i -//2a y.a 17 Phone: ( ) PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: _lit) 7S Sw 67,o9 7oc S-466> TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: 9S 1030 _ TL_ 1/00 ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: /C. 5 CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM (C.I.T.) AREA: C-Ic-tJ7'96 / ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Beier to Code Section 18. 376 l MINIMUM LOT SIZE: ~d6o sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: 4,,5 ft. Max. building height: TO ft. Setbacks: Front 'a:5 ft. Side 00 ft. Rear G ft. Corner ;20_ ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: - LJ NLIGNRORiIUUD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting HandouU THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S), AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON-Residential Ap*alionlPlanning Division section -LT D ~JBff4 L P g ~d0 sa r~~E ro A~I~: ev, k or, r> r :.,r d E~( NARRATIVE [Refer to Code ftter 18.3901 The APPLICANT SHAL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which prove es findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. IMPACT STUDY [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. []ACCESS [Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 183651 Minimum number of accesses: ! Minimum access width: 50~ ' Minimum pavement width: yo' All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.705.0301 WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. ❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS [Refer to Code Chapter .1301 STREETS: feet fr the centerline of LOWER INTENSITY ZONE feet, along the site's FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SI E YARD SETBACK. boundary. ❑ SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS [ efer to Code Section 18.730.010.8.1 BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTION -Buildings located in anon-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that- ➢ A maximum building floor a ea to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ➢ All actual building setback will be at least half of the building's height; and ➢ The structure will not ab a residential zoned district. BUFFERING AND SCREENING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7451 In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON-Residential Applicationnanning Division Section The ESTIMATED REQWED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable tdREur proposal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: [,LANDSCAPING [Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18365 and 183051 STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. [RECYCLING [Refer to Code Chapter 183551 Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. Q/PARMNG (Referto Code Section 18365.040) REQUIRED parking for this type of use: 1 cUace rc e.o~ r4 3 We f llf\ Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): mar SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: ➢ All arking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. ➢ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. [/LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18365.0801 Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON-Residential Appkation/Planning Division Section MIBICYCLE RACKS (Refer to C49 Section 18.1651 BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be • MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1151 The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify _sensitive land areas, and their boundaries. is the responsibility of the annlicant_ Areas meeting ine aeTlnltlons or sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. 7 ❑ STEEP SLOPES [Refer to Code Section 18.115.080.01 When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. CLEANWATER SERVICES 1CWS1 BUFFER STANDARDS [Refer to R & 0 96-44/USA Regulations - Chapter 31 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION & ORDER 9644 ~ _ LO ADJACENT sc r mm'-y-e^ V VI 6 T TEDs O V1 g NSITIVE~ EA DEFINITION r Tp SENSLTI~%~ ARE - CORRIDOR ER S DE~ ' • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% _ ► 10 to < 50 acres 15 feet 1 > 50 to < 100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands > 0.5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds Streams with intermittent flow draining: > 25% 1 10 to <50 acres 30 feet > 50 to < 100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands > 25% Variable from 50-200 feet Measure • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow . in 25-foot increments from the starting • Streams with intermittent flow draining > 100 acres point to the top of ravine (break in • Natural lakes and ponds <25% slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine' -Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds, whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor, shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet, if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residential Appficalion/Planning Division Section Restrictions in the VegekiW Corridor: NO structures, deve o ent, construction activities, garden , lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. Qj SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. [TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18390.030.CJ A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcls for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. MITIGATION [Refer to Code Section 18390.060.EJ REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-Residential ApplicationlPlanning Division Section If a replacement~e of the size cut is not reasonablylable on the local market or would not be viable, th irector shall require replacement wt more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: 0 The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 183951 The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. ❑ ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS/ (Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 fee/unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition ust have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS parcel is less than 1 Y2 times CODE CHAPTERS a/ 18.330 (Conditionawse) 18.340 (Director's interpretation) 18.350 (Planned Development) ✓ 18.360 (Site Development Review) 18.370 (vadances/Adiustments) 18.380 (Zoning Map/rext Amendments) / 18.385 (Misceuaneous Permits) ~L 18.390 (Decision making Procedurestimpaact study) 18.410 (Lot line Adiustments) 18.420 (Land Partitions) / 18.430 (subdivisions) ~SL 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts) - 18.520 (Commercial Zoning Districts) 18.530 (Industrial Zoning Districts) ALL NOT EXCEED 2%i TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. 18.620 (Tigard Triangle Design Standards) 18.630 (Washington Square Regional Center) :::/:l 8.705 (Accessegresslcircutation) 18.710 (Accessory Residential Units) 18.715 (Density computations) 18.720 (Design Compatibility Standards) 18.725 (Environmental Performance Standards) 18.730 (Exceptions To Development Standards) 18.740 (Historic Overtay) 18.742 (Home occupation Permits) 18.745 (Landscaping & Screening standards) 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobl Home Regulations) 18.755 (Mixed Sold wastelRegd'urg Storage) 18.760 (Nonconforming Situations) ~►L 18.765 (Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) 18.775 (Sensitive Lands Review) 18.780(signs) J 1 8.785 (Temporary Use Permits) 8.790 (Tree Removal) 18.795 (visual clearance Areas) 18.798 (Wireless Communication Facilities) 18.810 (Street & Utility Improvement Standards) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ar(, ---dam C~cce. CD c~ -}1,~~~s C+~l f1 e.C ~f off' PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. held by the City Council. with the Commission making a An additional public hearing shall be APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Communitv DeveloDment Department at Tinard C itv Hall nffirAS PI FASF NOTF• Annlirafinnc The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Residential Application Planning Division Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMM*: . Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 b 11 inches. One 1 8 2' x 11" ma o a proposed project should be submitted or attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maas shall not be accented- The administrative decilor public hearing will typically occuproximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted eing complete by the Planning Divis n. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing A 10-day public appeal enod follows. II land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard ~;4'. rr,-;, r, c-, I . A basic flowchart which illustrates the review process is available from the. Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). FLtASt NU I t: I ne conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submittin4 an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: bran f . I GTY Of TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7197 E-MAIL (stall's first name &.6gard.orms TITLE 18 (GTY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (ODE) INTERNET ADDRESS: www.cixigard.or.us H:lpattylmasters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 3-Oct-02 (Engineering section: preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON-Residential Ap*ation/Planning Division section PRE-A LICATION CONFERENCE OTES ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q Communitty~,°~°°nt ShiapingA Better Community PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax NOW: 2S1 030C Tax lot(s): 1100 Use Type: Rrst Baptist Addition The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Riaht-of-wav dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ® SW Gaarde Street to 38 feet from centerline (3-lane arterial w/ bike lanes). ❑ SW to feet ►~1s( i vi Fes- 11~1t" A~, L,. AOGG~- . It i S c Cf~G~t) AL N~ r.~4g R~ . ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet Street improvements: ® Minor street improvements will be necessary along SW Gaarde Street, to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ® street trees spaced per TDC standards (unless already installed as a part of the City's CIP project). ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-AppNcadon Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department Section ❑ Other: 0 0 1I 11o-Gf qv~, z street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: Q' Ito feet of pavement 6e-a-A car- WA-&c LT concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities EK !~i -foot concrete sidewalk Piz S-rR-GPs. [street trees street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. B other: ~s -6 f,.W q-s MWr ler i pvw . ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk CITY OF TIGARD Pre PllCatlon Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Deportment Section ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, tralWontrol devices, streetlights and a *-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: (1.) (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: ❑ Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW Prior to , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in- lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located along the west edge of the site adjacent to the creek. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to extend a new sewer lateral as necessary to serve the new buildin. Water Supply: The City of Tigard (Phone:(503) 639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 612-7010] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for CITY OFTIURD P"Plication Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering geparnuent section information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire prc*tion. • Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Onsite detention may not be required. The applicant's engineer can perform a downstream analysis per CWS standards to determine if the stream can accommodate the additional flows from this site. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ® Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ❑ Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. 1) A traffic impact report is required to be submitted as a part of the land use application. The traffic engineer will need to address level of service (LOS) at 110''/Gaarde. They will also need to include an access study to address the proposal to relocate the existing driveway on Gaarde Street. Access management standards of 18.705 must be addressed. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program colt fees from new development ba& on the development's projected impact upon the City's trans7oortation system. The applicant shall -re required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. Pay TIF. PERMITS Public Facility Improvement (PFI) Permit: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows: NOTE: If an PH Permit Is required, the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section Building Permit (BUG .1. This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrent) th, the SIT permit. . Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT $T1 Phone: 15031639-4171 Fax: [5031624-0152 klenglbrianedemplateslpreap notes - eng.dot Revised: March 21, 2002 o"7 CITY OF TIGARD Piro Pltcadon Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Eoglneering Department WOOD TIGA?ID FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 11075 SW GAARDE STREET TIGARD, OREGON CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION 8/06/04 Al CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW 2117/05 RIECIE ED ~'ILAR 01- me V~.M 'RRWECT TEAM g h r ' INDEX Of DRi4WlNGS v ARCHITECT CIVIL ENGINEER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ARBORIST ARCHITECTURALORAWINGS CIVIL DRAWINGS LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS ARCHITECT-LA CESNW CHRISTOPHER FRESHLEY TREE CARE AND LANDSCAPES Al PHASE 1 SITE PLAN Cl EXISTING SITE PLAN Lt LANDSCAPE PLAN 805 S.E. SHERMAN ST. 15513 SW BANGY RD. SURE 300 W TAYLOR SURE 355 1020 S UNLIMITED A2 PHASE 2 SITE PLAN C2 PHASE 1 SITE PLAN RBORIST DR WIN PORTLAND, OR 97214.4666 LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97035 , . PORTLAND. OREGON 97205 BOX 1566 A3 PHASE 3 SITE PLAN C3 PHASE 2 SITE PLAN A A GS LA OSW LEGO OR 97035 LAKE A4 LOWER LEVELFLOOR PLAN C4 PHASE 3 SITE PLAN Ti TREE INVENTORY PLAN CONTACT: LARRY ABELL CONTACT: CARL JENSEN CONTACT: CHRIS FRESHIEY , AS MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN C5 GRADING AND EROSION 503431,1122 g6g.6555 503222.9881 CONTACT: RAYMOND MYER A6 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN C6 CONTROL PLAN 503.6353165 A7 ELEVATIONS UTILITY PLAN C6A PROFILE, SW 110TH AVE. 20216 - CONDITI( TIGARD. R3.5 R4.5 z w 0J ~a QY D¢ co a R4 5 R7 R7 . z w ~J Qa NEW CURB AND GUTTER C7¢ i NEW PLANTER STRIP v i a NEW 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK SW 110TH AVE (LOCAL) _ _ _ _ EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT - " " - - - I 10'HAWTHORNE 76'-0' 21'-0' 110'-6' 14 24'4Y T411rMAPLE cu r T - - - - - N n ~~a 120 PHASE 1 PARKING o I 1 e EXISTirr a I~ 4 EXISTING - i--+ I 46SPACES BUILDING~ ; I FF 2571T ' CHURCH OUII I iuo Q , 3 FF.254.9a $ EX131 Ndj %f c 6 iq_q 3,-0 15'•6" 24'-0" - _ - - 24'-0' T HALL I I -1 VIT L I I 11 I' O fff--"' 3. OVERHANG I , I I BICYCLE I 1 TYP. a PARKING I R3.5 , Ir PINE 10 N y ® ® / EXISTBJGPARKING •76SPACES ' I 10- PINE Ir PgE t 1 I'••, WATER ~ I QUALITY SWALE 10 I I I I _ Q 1r RR Q _ t7 0 I I a 10 - I. ,'•i{FlR ' . IT FqR 10 RR 31 8'6- ry 7Vp - 10 PHASE 1 PARKING-88 SPACES 4 ' I h 5'TYP. IN r i_ REgK1MSL 0 0 _ 4 jj_j - 14 [ f7 4T FIR 2V FIR 4W FIR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ER 7*_ - a 20' BIKE PATH.-----/, __FAB.-' m IE EASEMENT " - - Q 1euu. Rs FM C7 R3.5 R3.5 L: R3.5 - - - - - - - - - ( 1 SITE AREAS: R3.5 S" PHASE 1 SITE PLAN 1 1 I EXISTING PHA PH.2 PH.3 BUILDING 12,793S.F.=6% 12,793S.F.=6% 16,346S.F.=8% 23,428S.F.=13% PARKING 27,460 S.F. =14% 70,620 S.F. = 35% 56,650 S.F. = 28% 67,293 S.F. _ 33% LANDSCAPE 162,449 S.F. = 8D% 119,289 S.F. = 59% 129,706 S.F. = 64% SCAM - V-W-v 05 Is 30 PARKING PHASE 1, 111,981 S.F. = 54% TOTALS 202,702 S.F. = 1DD% 202,702 S.F. = 100% 202,702 S.F. =100% 202,702 S.F. = 100% 3'OVERHANGSPACES: 6'$'X75'-6' 134 ' EXISTING SPACES 76 - - - - - - - 210 TOTAL STREET CENTERLINE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE NEW PROPERTY LINE AFTER 8' ROW DEDICATION N ' J , a F Q Q , F W W F N W Q Q Q NO, CESS TO GAARDE UND R PHASE 1 D' BIKE PATH VEGfT TED COMMUNITY BOUNDARY WETLAND BOUNDARY CENTERLINE OF CR EK R12 ARCHITECT ' LA 805 S.E. SHERMAN STREET PORTLAND, OR 972144666 5031231-1122 FAX 50312314317 V U F - w W cc: Z N ; o a occ Q Qo o cc V n C ~ L_ ^ A/ r LL T r CONTENTS: PHASE 1 SITE PLAN PROJECT : 20216 DRAWN BY : DATE : 8112104 REVISIONS : CONDITIONAL USE © REVIEW 2117M5 Q1 ATM'RCHtrrtEC ~u~Re I. No, by" M'=Pu^ifsm 0 ARCHITECT -LA CcPPO z0M R3.5 R4.5 R4.5 R7 R7 NEW CURB AND GUTTER NEW PLANTER STRIP NEW 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK SW 110TH AVE ~EXISTINGEWEOFPAVEMENT - 1 551-01 11 24'•0" ° t ® I I - Gm W 78'•6' 37.6' ` I rJ)1z MIRE I HASE2 I RI~ r. ys - - - -PARKING , I 1 ; SPAC 20' Set ICI I v ,1.,... 3'-0'+ 24'-0' 3'-0' 9 I-~EXISTIIJa , 1--~ 1 MINISTRY[WILE)1W, EXI I I FF.257.P CHURCHBUILDIN F 4 I I I-z---,-~.- FF 254.83' $ I I I 6 I 86' 1 I I I QX it 14G 1 TYP. I I 43 BOLTHALL ' I - IPHASE2 r- I I 15'•6' 24'-0" I I 1 1 8 8 1 ,qf NADDITION 1 I '•6' m I I I TYP. 8 CY T I I 1 1 PARKING d M✓\SO~fHflYTRASM ENCl05lRiE ~ r 1 I (CHAIN LWKI~ OGENWG 6~1E4 i 'y 1UPIN 1 I ALIGN WITH DRIVE AISLE 1 •a I . 5 .R P R3.5 1 1 , 12- PINE ryy i ; t` ,r 10 :I N ooo SHED ~®1V PPIF` tip I ` I'• WATER - ~5 QUALITY SWALE 10 4 s 1 7 IzFw 9 I IT FIR" 1 1 N'FIR~~ f..~ 10 I y,f I 17 RR 4 8,6, T. 10 10 4 I ®®1l FIR \ ® N , rP 1 10 88 i v ~Ih 5'TYP. IN, 1 24-FIR 24M IC N I \ _ p - 101 111 11 111 10 4 E9kfN Sl GP s a II _ F- ~.r - ---7dAR ' 40- RR 1 - ~S RR _ _ ffCp 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7~ 1 I \ - ~ ~ ~ All -AIbERSR~ 20' BIKE PATH - - - - - - I FIB - - - R ; e EASEMENT 1 T \ Yi7 I I r--'------------------------ 1 ; I R3.5 R3.5 I ~ I R3.5 N I R3.5 S"°° PHASE 2 SITE PLAN I SCALE = ranor 05 Is w I II PARKING PHASE 2 STREET CENTERLINE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE NEW PROPERTY LINE AFTER V ROW DEDICATION' w W co) W a Q Q a r, I NICCESS I -20' BIKE PATH EASEMENT WET( ND BUFFER. BOUNDARY VEGITATED COMMUNITY BOUNDARY II WETLAND BOUNDARY I CENTERLINE . OF CREEK 1 3'OVERHANG SPACES: 8'-8'X15'-6" 144 EXISTING SPACES 8 152 TOTAL R12 ARCHITECT - LA 805 S.E SHERMAN STREET PORTLAND, OR 97214-4666 5031231-1122 FAX 5031231-0317 V M LL 2 F- U W r U.I ~Z F Wq a o~ Q Q O. M W < N U) 0 Lo p. I\ LL O Q T Q ~ II `V r CONTENTS: PHASE 2 SITE PLAN PROJECT : 20216 DRAWN BY : DATE : 8112/04 REVISIONS : CONDRIONALUSE REVIEW2f17105 Q2 iHf RMnp b ;=,e ATUTIrt -u a c>~IW~ a uIalTECr •u Otappgt R3.5 R4.5 R4.5 R7 R7 NEW CURB AND GLITTER NEW PLANTER STRIP NEW 5'CONCRETE SIDEWALK SW 110TH AVE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXISTING r EDGE OF PAVEMENT i -2V-'CWAA n - 1 T W W IV H.WIH _ _ _ - - - - - - - 1 I ~y 76--0' S5-0' 76-.6' ° 2 3Z-6* 10 _ _ tt -a . '1 10(/1 r---------r------- - - - - - - -------i - - - I I I I , 120, '~P)-~ N -0• gE}.IJTIIW +Y Yl ~"1, ' SP.I • m° MINISTRY BUILD01, f -EXISTING I I Ff.2571T ~'sr ''CHURCH BUILDING 4 I I I r-• PHASE 2 0 - $ I 3'-0 15'•6" 24'-0' ON n ~f I 6 4 11 1 ADDITI r ' ' 1 I --------r 1 I Y 1 TYP. - - - - - - 24'4' 8 6 4 ° I I I ~ n IcYa xa~p I I PARKING MASONRY TRASH ENCLOSURE p 1 V 1`F I a '•'Q ~ e~7,~ r r~ Itl F20'(QEM 0751D WI1H I Q PHASE3 'Y 4~ w'Y ~y. I. I CH AIHLII.ICFULLOPL711N0 O~TE9 IOPWE PARKING 55 SPACES j I F ' 1„. A" W17H DRIVE AISLE N 9'F' y 9' ?c I n I : I I 10 ~ ' a u~ , 1Y INE 11 3 ~ h / ~ d(fi w, ~ I I PHASE ep ~ 3 1; P' I ~IP %IIE, ` v AADDITION k I r1 WATER m~q,4r _ I I '-•OUALITYSWALE 10 s5 '~a•yz c7,'~^' 1 I 9 5 ,r k I ' IzFw 9 ~ ' I . N 10 t'~ I 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 '•Lr FW I I If FIR~~ 1~'~F• 17 FAR' I - \ 10 ~ 7 1 OzRR N 8'6 >YP 5 ®014- FIR BICYCLE PARKING 10 76 INSIDE BUILDING TYP. 1 _ 24-RR 2rFR 1e \ j..}5'nP. TN IB'FlR ® ® ® BR~eL7N 10 10 4 _"I r C _ _ _ ~ al 3COP _ u _ C/ r - - _ • 7CFIR 10FIgR' 2°• FIR - - ~I-~y ~~IJ$2" ® _ _ _ it '1VbEA9 ERR I 20' BOLE PATH - - -z}1B _ m a EASEMENT ' \ ` ' - - -1- - - - c FIR 3(r IW FIRS I I ~ I 1 1 1 I I I R3.5 R3.5 I I I I ( 1 I R3.5 R3.5 3~P 1 1 STREET CENTERLINE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE 38'-0' 30'-0' I NEW PROPERTY LINE / AFTERVROWDEDICATION W H N W O I Q I ~ ru R12 20' BIKE PATH EASEMENT I - WETLAND BUFFER BOUNDARY -VEGTTATED COMMUNITY BOUNDARY - WIETLAND BOUNDARY I -CENTERLINE OF CREEK 1 I No PHASE 3 SITE PLAN ® ' SCALE.I-FW4• 05 15 30 PARKING PHASE 3 3'OVERHANG SPACES: W-6'X1S'fi' 177 EXISTING SPACES 8 185 TOTAL ARCHITECT ' LA 805 S.E. SHERMAN STREET PORTLAND, OR 97214.4666 503 !231.1122 FAX 5031231-0317 2 I.L 2 V w Ill 1- W °C z V/ o N H LLJ q a ow Q 0 Q rR v cr N (n OF IX Lo F- LL V _ CONTENTS: PHASE 3 SITE PLAN PROJECT: 20216 DRAWN BY : DATE : 11111/04 REVISIONS : CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW 2/17105 Q3 TNf Q~arYFpph Pe e>mdve pop" a ARCHITECT lA h ,repla0apl°I p'r,- Wany mewaNk4~ a ARCKE T - LAMCaIKanmo-l O CapRIIPtl 2005 SW 110TH AVE - - - 76'-0' L 55'-0" i 76'-6' 32'-r , BICYCLE PARKING INSIDE BUILDING I I ru W co w a 0 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN N 10,500 S.F. SCALE. tnc.l•? 0 S 18 ARCHITECT • LA 805 S.E. SHERMAN STREET PORTLAND, OR 97214-4666 5031231.1122 FAX 5031231-0317 V M M ILL i U F- w w °C z N NO H wq (L oW Q Q0 m <o N U)~ I- Lo n L O r Q r 0 F- CONTENTS: FLOOR PLAN PROJECT: 20216 DRAWN BY : DMI DATE :11111104 REVISIONS : CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW 2117/05 Q4 wrrnEC by was, C.lan[tt 0 Otaq,yt SW 110TH AVE l7i lL 0: F W 0 1t MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN N 15,125 S.F. w~ SCALE. ln6'.l'4r o e is ARCHITECT - LA 805 S.E. SHERMAN STREET PORTLAND, OR 972144666 503!231-1122 FAX 503l 231-0317 X5 i U D U ~ w w °C z N u0 wq a ow Q Q0 m <o N CC Lo LL T loc Q 0 CONTENTS: FLOOR PLAN PROJECT: 20216 DRAWN BY : DM DATE :10111!04 REVISIONS : CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW 2117/05 Q5 MsQ~Ngh l nd~¢.a ptpeil/d MLMIIEC Pete, - be9t97 pmdttifen baby.me by vamhaene d uronrzct . LA mcaR+ye pax SW 110TH AVE UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 4,165 S.F. SCALE . in8'.1'-0 ru w W 0 N~ ~IIIYYY/// 0 4 8 18 ARCHITECT • LA 805 S.E. SHERMAN STREET PORTLAND, OR 97214.4666 503!231.1122 FAX 503!231-0317 2 U V F - Ill w °C N U) z 0 a W o 0 Q < m <o N ~LD cr ~F _ r• LL, o T Q T 0 F CONTENTS: FLOOR PLAN PROJECT: 20216 DRAWN BY : DM DATE :10111104 REVISIONS : CONDRIONAL USE REVIEW 2/17/05 Q6 rtEC c -m MpI • Pem. r by va M w a rxnlrtcl • IA . OCCanya AU.L F. FL 257.17 ~S ASPHALT SHNGIES 767.C QiQ OL F. FL 257.1r _y u.L F- FIL 245.W b ,771002 PHASED ADDITION EXISTING CHURCH NORTHWEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION SCALE = V=16'-W 2W~ ASPHALT SHNGIES i d CouroslmH som -m M.L. yF. FL 7407 b EXISTING CHURCH LL F~ PHASED ADDITION SOUTHWEST ELEVATION ASPHALT SHINGLES F. iL 751.97 SOUTH ELEVATION ARCHITECT • LA 805 S.E. SHERMAN STREET PORTLAND, OR 972144666 5031231.1172 FAX 5031231-0317 V V ~ W W ~Z N N0 F- w 0 a oIll Q Q0 m0 N N0 cl: Lo r - IL O r Q r M LL Q r V _ L r CONTENTS: ELEVATIONS PROJECT: 20216 DRAWN BY : DM DATE :11/11/04 REVISIONS : CONDITIONAL USE 0 REVIEW 2/17105 Q~ =ATEwrgg - LA «rLehepapay a MCIIRECi LA P«ae, npaAC4on a aePmem M•rv hakaA' a ARCHITECT LA Dlmimon 0 to, ; X 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Sw 1,0 AVE 911 ~ ~ ~ 11 1 1 t Tnogoo r wo 7o 8 ~ " $ ; -4 94 5p z~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ B ppTiS <A~ Tie 04--j Z ~ Y r ojI C LA SIRE o i -Is gpap.sm 3m B05SE p EOREGON gI035 P 22 5CAPRO° 4~~ ,191 tw "0' 9 'fa $woo Y &&I A4 1]KE' ~ FpMOYF~" PL►STC w-w I / / / " - 230 sw5$ ' `!t ` Nlr({ t t~ l 1rlt /l 1,/`If % 11r ~c~t \ 238 RM ~tt tj rr/f v If y l l/ t' 1! I / t t r r II ! If / t 1 ii/%~ °z.o ` vnn± s pK P1.• 24°-~-- N CATCka's'" ir~nttlllll7 1.11/11 /Ir11111/jI 1 I ti~ ~245 _ '~tl' (till{lJ! 111 I /t Jlt! l l ~ >S ! I I (l~~~r1~~~('I lrli It II~1j / 1 i !I ~ N ► I !!*~LL~~ tt/1111 11 1111( rl I / ) 1 ~ti ~.;WeE 73.zr ~ t ! ! ~ I~t i'~ i ! i ! ~ I i J r11 I 1 i~+ t i Il ~l1/Ilil'i/I I 11(~~i 250; i ! I I !I IIl I i t f itti 1 1 1 111 1 a, ~ r1°' 1' t Itlll Jt 11 ! III I I i 1 r 111111 E tl l I _ ! I! lI't//1!l i~1 i I 1 111111 t14 Illt~ u All I ii tl 111~'~Illl I I I I'I 1111tH+~~~i !1!! ~ti~.. 1 1 ^1/llltl rl I t11 11 1 1 t 111~~11,~1P , w x 1 11~ 01/rN~ll/~l ~ w r ~ + ~ (I ~1 ~1riJ11,1 l ~ cs~-~~'~ ~~z;1111 tf1(!rf I ! ~ 1t~; ~ l11~111atN ,tip' `Y~ I 1! 1 I / u ; \ ~ I I ~i I I l l l III 11 I(1~1/ 1 11 I1 t 1 ! I y i I~111 I I I ~t 11 R 1111(1 illl f ti I i I 1 1 ~r 111/ 11111 I II /ll I I c If t 1i 11 "f 46 a sl.a 11 1 i li 11 / t I /+l' I I it it I I III t 1 / ' ; g>,~ . llI/r~11111~1~1 / I/I/I1 ! 1111*III~~II'II! ,w~ i ~ I S H Ids ~ 1r 111 ~11 11 i ! ! I l111111~1111l► / PARIG ~ ` _ EN QK 11''t%i/ III I l l I i I' I I I 1 ~«~5 f i l ' s W, ti~►RD / I/ I III' Itlli Il 1 - r Aµ i 1 I a~l 1I I 111111`1111111 rr - wAU• i1 ' ' 1\\ 111 \ 1 i l I I 1 111111111111 `t = SOS . \ 1 11 i 11111, 11111 r_ , , I 1 \,11174 1 1 i 1111.11 1 111 _ t~A \\x\111111 11 \ I s ' w ~1~11111\l1~`,1,,~ ' 11,~ I , ' I!~ f ~1'~111111111 ~ -1- ~ ,u 11,111~ti1 l III, ! 11 ! i p4 I K Ililili r - MW COOS 1;1i1~,~,11 ! , , 111,11 II~,i1111 i - i' wow '11',11 I1'a,~~,~~ I it II11~1i~,1~11 1 ; any c,v 11111111' 1( 1 1 1) ( 111~1i<tl~i'i - J 1 111 1"38 ~111111111~I1 111111! t~ 1 t 11111~111~11111 ` qAU. ~I~Illilll ~ 1 r 1i►►IP ~ l 1 111111111111 # SIVS 1111111 1 i I1J I j 1 11 1 I 4 1~1it11,11 230 w1oE a,~a ,r ; ~•ar ' .s,.3S MtON 'A p e 1111l11j11 f Ill % 1/ f~ Y I I III 1111,1,1 1 V. NG _ 5' P plllll ~11\~< 1 1 t ~1(1 it I\ / 111111111,1 ~~--249-pN~ 1 IIf X11 j1 j %It ~~I1 j f t \ 1 V t / I II 1111`1`` _z,~- ~«~S i AWED 247 1111 Ill jt j j 1/t t . ~ (1 I - 00 ~ 1 I~lil/tr jrtl`~ 6/ 1 1 1\ 1 y IRO►15lrCAP I 11 y s ,X* IS 5 1 SIC c ~'I '1 II a~'!V4~ s Z " ► 11' p EX• S1TE PLAN , WAPO 503-231./1 503.9 i pK Pi- i s W -O pK pl- ~~rzsx' 8!N ~ SE ~o5to w+ Is B ApTIST CH 'IT T, S CZ ~A IAXN art m s i^ - yoAp,S180 ABa ~SE,pND Eon%,Wl STREET 15573~GYORE~ ~ 5p 231_1122 w ;J-0 ~ gqE PLAN i~HASE 1 PK PL- 0 0 a egos" py, Pt- rw g aW, p,AA x ~ "I Lr-z p < y 8 g N OS ,x jr Wpm . 30 gppT1ST H RG~ TIGpR~ ARCMITED'l E BAH STREET 1~. ow m u ~II s AOAp,StB'ioo 80 D. OR2GON 5 SE 7-~'~ t. pEV. g1A5L 155 UWGYO N 9x1035 3..231.112 ie~ tai M,,r ~Xgp6Wfs~~~a~ 50 SjTE PLAN ;ti rcY~~ oNASS 2 Ma PATH ` 1dW1 , , EASEMENT sci - 233 240 S.W. O~MEN PK PL /cs I l I I I I I/I//]~/// rCATCHS.ASIN t 1' II I III 11' I lI I 1 1 , / / l/ l S / / ' ' ~ ~ ~1-243 / I~IT /II/llllill~l l I I I I I , I I In /MV I l/ 'e, L / 11/6 z.' / Qom; ;T' W AV) 1 CD L4 tl N I 3 -ti r , 11 .01 \11111 / I ~ / ;I I ; - • ^ ~ ~ l / - ~ I ~ I~ ,~~11\1\ \I.1 'lli 'I III II I~ I I i 11 I~ IA I ~ / 1 e ~`~~\\\\\~\1\\lll~l l~~ll 11~ fi. 1 IIII / I .IIII ,~,3 ( S.W. GARDEN PK PL 1 1 1 111,1 ~I~t I I it I / ~ s 1~~1 \`\~\\1 \ 1 ` / 1 IIII WAIL~I SHOP Illlipl~ll~lll I i ~'i 1 'Illllpl I'~I 1 1/ 1 III I I IIIIIIIIIIIII 11 /o/ I I I' IIII11111~I1~1 ~t/ I hll'I1 IIIIIIIillii~l 11 I r I I IIII II ~ / / I IIIlillllll I~ ~j IIII 111 I Illilllll / / 1 11 I I~IIIIIIII~I' ~j/,%1111 ~ 11/illill r I I II ~ ~ I it VIII / / =f/II VIII I l~ / 'y'/ IIIIIIIIIIIII~ BALL / /III jl ~r ~ I ~ II / III I~I~I~III I / III' II ,IIII l(r WE KEY S wpu Y / 11111 ---O' WiDE VADE STONE 4 STONE II 1 MAO! DOORS TO Fm 3 I~ >I I I II 1 3 3 ~mills !I I I a1uRa ar1<1c,: I ,el HASE 3 \ / I iY' / L I V -249 I- OOM41J~tt BOUND PROP. DRIVEWAY - - / - - CONSTR. PHA 2 9 9 2 \ W S.W. GAARDE STREET I I x!I►I -a 0 app x .o.. m r - m C) m z 0 C&1 I DRAM! E ff. C81 1. REV. FOR E,<D OWEN90N5 s 2_15-05 TIGARD BAPTIST CHURCH CE.-SINW - ' " PHASE 3 SITE PLAN 15373 SWBANGYROAD, STH3W ARCHITECT LA V' T LMMOSWEGO,ORHGON VMS 805 SE SHERMAN STREET 503.96&6655 wmw.cee Aww PORTLAND, OREGON 194",.048ASEBWC 503-231-1122 • 0 NOTE BOUNDARY LINES ARE FOR GRAPHICAL PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPRESENT PROPERTY LINE S 8939.48' E . 263.18' X f n SHOP \ 880: PATH EASOADIT I' J1. qll I9`59'46'E 73.2Y II / I I J , / - ^ II1 , I 114 1l I W ~I I II / l is I f~ 1 X71 1 1 1 l I ti}rl l~l ~ l 0 1~\~~I ~l ll~~ 1 1 ~ I III~~ 11 ,lull l/ x'46' E 81.04' I I ~Ill~l ////l I I ~ 11.►~ Illll I IIII I ~ I I 18 \1`11\\\ II 1 I .1 n R I I r I1 I \~\1\ \~~d~ \\IIII I II \ \ ~ I ~~~,~1~111\\ III I S 69`55'56' w i J I / / E 0' I /1 ! I1 11111111 ! 111111111111 l I I'1~111 ~ I I 1111 / Ililt _ "NICE N 111 - - 249 15~~ ~ r RA a PIZ 230 > ?35 Cg 8 ya ~ 6 2+G+ S.W. I*RDEN PK PL. 3 g z co) y r< a ov Q m 1 8 I ''•I I I I I S.W. GARDEN PK PL i STEPS 11j l 7.17 I w Twol9c DAH I I~ 3 7^ v I MAIN DOORS TO FO Ili lam? r ( , NORM . I1 3 CENTER I I BwD.IO I j l ~ I FF 254.93• 1 I lu 3 CHURCH OnICE I I I . AIM-raw" 0.21 T- P! IA P f Y N D P ~ " P ~ DRIV"Ay - C I y w .T R. 2 a GlNB AND a G ~pGS i yQ . iw S°~ q s a S.W. GAARDE STREET 1~IIII 4j l~ \j II IIII96r IIIIiiI lil +ii I P I~ 1 IIIIIIIIiI 111 ~JSE~l 4 1 I. 111111 III V, ~ r I hl IIIIIIIIII~IIr o i ~I I1~ l 1 III I I ` I IIII~I~IIyI//Y/ ~uI I~ ~ IIIIIIII'7~,1 I I I 1111 I ~Ililll / ~ / 1,11 p lIlllllll~/ s6939'oo'w ,0895 / COAIY Ty BOUND I I I II ~ 1 x 11~ all 1 ~ ~ I o pt I a Ts a .o. m z 010"' I I GRADING AND EROSION 01 CONTROL PLAN J A > Pt -11 X21 h jig RIP No _ it; .1 x ~ ma Ogg a ~ f a 9 n `i lie it 2 12 s ~g CE.SINW TIGAD BATIST CHURCH IS573SWBANGYROAD6STE300 I ARCHITECT LA LAt030SWBGO,ORHGON 97015 805 SE SHERMAN STREET 503.966.6655 www.oemvwm PORTLAND, OREGON 503-231-1122 1115 001 aA n I ~ iffy 0 a N - m jig p fill, u ~ RA O 6 "Jo 110 g 0 a ~ 00 ~K Qi n fA Z 9 1 I i• S.W., GARDEN PK PL CATCHBASIN I ; 3 I 3 I, S II ~I I II I 3 I 1 II ~ I3 ~ i II I S.W. GARDEN PK Pl. ~II!~ lu mw I 1 snn I I I~ i FENM I II I MAIN DO= TO I I P emm I ; SAN it I I I 113 / "Mips CWAKH 0"m 7 I I ~ 1'M 108.85' / / COMM umTy BOUNO ~ - - - I . ! PROP. OR'rE - - ! - ~ - CONSTR Df1 2 - - ' S.W. OAARDE STREET I I I I I I I I I ' x g❑ I I I I I I d~ la l7 B O X o • p rn z N 0.1 g ,e.s 7 -0a A P P~ arM+ C ES INW TIGARD BAPTIST CHURCH UTILITY PLAN 6 ARCHITECT LA 15 V/ t.1KEOSWEGO ORECA)N 97MS 805 SE SHERMAN STREET 503.%8.6655 oav«mvrnm PORTLAND. OREGON + 6~~w 503-231-1122 256.5 I 256.7 267.M + 257.6 0 0 K) K) Do w • V4 o fommmsmwo Svcs a IVCE: 256. 3 ! „ v Cvcst 1 00 Ic cute .70 erc~ , s2.Is SrC[: n 254.36 + 258.5 S N 267.66 r N 257.3 257.43 I PL M 256.06 2►52 . + 255.7 S 252.0 0 0 1 rim 4+11L 0 avm 261 - 261.06 ► 249.7 2ftn It's 217A7 ~ ~ , ~ Cn + 245.8 tit S > 23.20 / 240.1 COOL: ~1. 1 4 - + 3 00 Svcs: 6+ 231.10 ' ► SYM 231.1 9 - 228.1 • Wpow La 22a1o ~ i i + 224.1 i ' 221.2 WJ7 1 1 ~ a I 1 22om , + 219.7 I 1 0 o , nals 220 6 _ Bab . - 1 , , 1 , , + 221.5 \ 0 o [ , I' PROFILE 3W 110TH AVENUE CESINW TIGARD BAPTIST CHURCH IS SaOAD,SM3W ARCHITECT LA LUCEOSWEGO.OREGON 9►035 805 SE SHERMAN STREET 303.96SAM vnvw.ccsawAmm PORTLAND. OREGON 803-231-1122 91 J ~ d a Y Y a a R3.5 R415 R415 R7 R7 m NEW CURB AND CUTTER 3 Q NEW PLANTER STRIP u Cn NEW 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK NOTE: PLANTING VmIm4TNEwSIa4C1Eq,RANCETRkwGLESSHAu BE MAINTANED"SOASTO PROVOE CLEAR LINESOF.SIGIR._.. (E%CEpT FOR TREE TRIAB(SI BETWEEN3 FT AND S Fr. ABOVE CURB HEIGHT S.W. 110th AVENUE o AP _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 M 19'IFG 10 SP vv1 r.. - - - - - 14, 10 F I8 BP _ M p' CEiIAkI \ M 13 5 / 12 MR H \ ,L FASTING LANDSCAPE T r 13 FG 20 MR -.-P15f0]C.__ TO REMAIN I set LE 25 MR 18 BPH 25 21 MR 3! ( MINISTRY BUILDING CHURCH BUILDING E%1STING LANDSCAPE 1 11 TO REMAIN s eN PHASE 2 ADDITION 4 MR I a , 1 11 O 3' o.c. 2 JM- 'l 15 FG 189 D FG 18 ID 2 R 30 FG 15 MR 2 RO 22 M 2 RO 7 SV 15 F 27' :GFS II 8 3H BPH 19 FG 13 S5vV fi RA 23 G 3 CP 8 3 15 b : 8 DS D BPH R I l0 11. 3 2 JM B AFC /1 ~l J,,n 1e BN / 1 JA PH% A r ON F f J~ r~ J ' ~ IAA 1 P.1 9 OS /5 SV i S 2 3M 36 Dv I 5'AECT " 9 NR 3 OF I SP 1 r~ ! z, 14G ` 3 RA VN It A I 1PA \\11F// 10 IPA 4 N 5 I 8AL / i ±IC F7 + H- 12 R 12' FO2 ~Se\Q 1 PA 1 PA 2q l PA 12 F //!II 0\\ 14' FIR 21,E 24TIR 10 / 2 DF a ION 5 a Ip 2pp8 M 1 0 ~~\11111//Z ~dtIIIII~\ATIfIIIrpII/q~ PA 1 PA 4 B ~•1 - IB'FIR + + \ = } BR('gKIN llf~ 10 4 i J-Hd =i/~r11Up~i~r~R111~~~~''i`v~~711IW~iIii ~1oPO 11 r----- /-'-'•\N;_ ~36'J1R K1 40'F0; -20' FIR \ J ' - - - - ^r '\l \ -`'~a1 - - LL 1 + 48' FIR pp'~ E~KKEE - _-__-10'fIR!ZINh -uR--•-/i- EAKENTPPApTH m 10 + + = R' ALD. + ' \ - - - - llti`,,j IN' FIR ' ,J ,I I I ~ I R315 R3.5 IF 8315 %RlJI, / STREET CENTERLINE f" EXISTING PROPERTY LINE F- w NEW PROPERTY LINE AFTER 8' ROW DEDICATION w d' (0 Q Q C9 (n -7 AP. 2EAS IENTTH -2 AP ~I W A Y WETLbND BOUNDARY LANDSCAPE LEGEND - SLBM COMMON NAPE WTWCAL NAME 42E/COND. SPADIIG K R3 5 N 1FSE3 ao RW AM. 1.5, col. 20' na 9 ws 24'-30' 5' a~ 3 I PHASE 3 LAND PLAN Abw Mro Aa a mnerrene'Bue W a 11s Bo/ - (1/3 . It.. GN. 2/3 M. Boy) AFC RN rlnnnYp C oo 2 Rd e pt - Aiar r.;-- AP AHeloaot Pwr P,- crospnp'Mn+laapi Y al. 301 ae IMRI BM. Prmrnr Nm : a-3o' Bs' a~ Rox Ba. Bmr Rm < a 3C ear. e-, ' SCIYE = I'=30'-0' 0 5 1 30 CP Omtki Pw p,-o a ea,mo'Gmtkleer' 2' col. 15' ae pG TAne Pr:Keb Aee . m<w.w D^PVoe Spun : qd. p.- . e<rbele aUPpapa« xa RN ReUI M 0 2 ptl. s• o.e OF DwMm Fk 6'-7' 15' ac Spk~ Did V61Nnar1 2 qd. N.c. r SV Shwte 19- 2e-30' 5. . Pbeu6oterpn ,,,mom ' "w' ' . '~"rr"r" Pr 6'o to-ot'm 'Sh-W IC Manx Celia Cdoc .6emmma 6'-Y lo' ae re roun dn Or 1 Pwibelan Iopaae 'l db' I qal. 25 ae CROJNDCONER a Jop_. Mople 2' al. 25 a.e GA fin Merc 3 < o.e NEHY tabRl Cataeoxo 1 pd. 3A' ac. Cot-1. CmumN Rpr,aM' PA Aw prknatum Pot- Mh a1 a pe,arpp 'P b x«inen trw 2' col. 3U ac GFS , Abtln amtliAap T6.ae C.-' Colo- Spiu Spkooo 'Gotdh_. 2 yd. V:- Or Cow . RA Ronrood Api t d A Y cd. .W ax. Ip I>mB Oog.eo6 21'-30' 3.p.c Co R. 1AA10A O phpr pi o.c a It YM ` ' RO ay eo r m7 RW Orb 2' col. 35 o.c Mp Ca u. wkw I«nV ,kgevex Aeaanaro 24--30' 4 e e . lb- P" 24 nc shoo. mvaoryue 2i ae sp Pk1_ sp CAW-,'. ScotN PFe 6'-7' 15' o.c NO Frn PPaeca Ntlxy Opq.oatl tS'-Ie' Y o.c . wpbBamb kw 21' nc B1, = ' Pkwy rywsbb ' ' Y ' Caw. wrew K4..N Can p(p . w Me Mpde Aw NrNgam e - 8 ac 5-elan mbinum YR Phk 4e'sad Rp« 2 qd. 3' Sot L- Noon . YuARaN Twrk' I 1 -F Edrtiq OerMwln free to xandn w Rox 10d. 3' nc' N07F5 OC flax rutkax Un Dqn 24 -30' x 3' . IrolaAOtkn mud _M17 mmd wIF aA I__. pe ra0e Y , aN m Cit 7 d nN •0°1 P r ilGed ca•diCana al rVa IGI, Mamb 91oltom ' 7. krigdlm to be Prowftd by n buy -tk .n 7- lye- j - } _ CtotbR troller Lee to R- OS O e mo oMbw. dada 2 pl 5 n.c g R12 ARCHITECT Y LA 805 S:E. SHERMAN STREET 'PORTLAND, OR 97214-4666 503 / 231-1122 FAX 503 / 231-0317 U U L,J LLJ V/ ~Z n WW Q ~ Q ao a Q Gl L7 Ln ~ LL o F-~ f-- CONTENTS : PHASE 3 LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT : 80216 DRAWN BY I HS DATE ; 814/04 REVISIONS 4•:4?d,.::cu NEvmw M P~ptCL1 Y LAwR se, np~aANLmo( tr( ern reun b s6ilh. IeRt tir Iritlpn cw#t LK _.ewl BOUNDARY LINES ARE FOR GRAPHICAL FOUND S/8" IRON ROD PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED WITH WITH ALUMINUM CAP TO REPRESENT PROPERTY LINES •A" STAMPED 'WAKER' • FOUND 5/B' . S 8958'48' E283,18' FOUND 5/8' IRON ROD IRON ROD S8959'48E 99.09' W1TH YELLOW PLASTC CAP SAN MH n8 N - - r ti m~ ryo ~ r BIKE PAI N h N N N 'Sg ryh0 hry0 h~/h9 23O EASEMENT ♦ w. 232 231 h , I ~ 233 232 m ,a 2y4 233 N 'rr 1 235 234 B E 3 w W I 231 235 ~,Tr 1238_ 23g I 0 ry}9 237 ; 23a N z 11 _ Y T~ Z79 WITH 5/ W PLASTIC CAP 243 240 SW GARDEN PARK PL A 4 244 241 0 M 58959 'E, 73.xr 242 3 . " k 244 CATCHBASIN I ryA5 - n° 1 R 245, W 248 247 v rv 248 ' 4 I 8'.q ry~ 2<,3 W m SAN 10' E ryA 12So i z h~ I7 ; h~ ryy, ?J, 2V b m 6 BOLT HALL NN h ,4, N N N~N$ryY ~Q n IOU 00' HA Sh~?J m S 8959'48' E 8104' I CR 'u m ? ry NM1. ; 14' PINE IOC q, 3 m I?' IVIA7 I /I ' N ry N£ N N 1o' PI I 3 ~ hg ~ I ay . HANDICAP u 3 W PARKING 18 P SIGNS ? FIR OU ? 1~ - $ FIR Im CIEANOUT a s I SW GARDEN PARK PL z N FOUND 5/8' IRON ROD 4' AREA GRAIN ' WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP ` 10' WIDE ? I v 3. STAMPED 'T. BURTON LS 590' \ KEY STONE 9 AC o WALL 5 3 ; v) S1EPS m ~DYELLOW IRON PLACAP S' 1G OU . 2 I FOUND 5/8' STAMPED 'T. BURTON LS 590' -Ni I Cl.LANOU I 10' WIDE 5 I IRON, ROD S"VE` I W KEY STONE GR R WAFT 257.,7 , . < ED , J SHOP cow FLAATWIRK 20' CED 4 STEPS U 9TEPS 10 WIDE ' 5' HIGH mHNro ryn 3 WOOD z n' N STEPS c n FENCE a N m n N WAIN DOORS TO FO Im ^ I f,. N N N m $ " 3 m AG STEPS a N ry w g n - 4" I WORSHIP 3.' CENTER 10' WIDE BUILDING KEY STONE I~ ; WALL KE EDT STEPS FF 254.95 IU FOUND CITY OF 71CARD -2766 BRASS CAP . . m { I GRAVEL. WIDE CHURCH OFFlCE BM 0138 " $ PARKING i. ' ALL s 249 ~ 10 FOUND 5/B' IRON ROD / / 248 HANDIOUCAP P1NQ u 3 WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP PARKING . STAMPED 'T. BURTON LS 590' 47 SIGNS AIM O OUNO 5/8' IRON _ i ROD WITH YELLOW " PLASTIC CAP TS50' 33.15' tiYS S 8958'00' W 313.19' MAN FOUND 5/8'f L~35' STAMPED IS 5.508'00'W 108.65' DRIVE WAY. IRON ROD 6=89'48'17' 1841' .1/4 CORNER 3/10 FOUND 5/8' IRON ROD I NO CAP L-31. ' I FOUND 5/8' FOUND 2' DIAMETER MATH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP =5454' 521W IRON ROD IN -BRA sS CAP_ STAMPED T. BURTON Ls 590GAARDE STREET CB MONUMENT BOX N 8956'00" E 1403.32' TREE SURVEY FOR TIGARD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 11075. SW GAARDE ST. TIGARD, OR l O 15 30 60 1' - 30' LEGEND FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED SAWARf MANHOLE GAS METER o SIGN AS NOTED LITE o X ' C E ROUE SM ELEVATION POMvPOEE . HANOICIP PARKING SYMBOL 0 JUNCTION BOX CONIFEROUS TREE AS NOTED DECIDWS TREE /S NOTED P POWER INXE', . GUY ANCHOR . Ell TELEPHONE CILOSURE p FIRE HYDRAE % WATER-VALVE ECHRC I'M ,y EI GAS METER WATER VAULT APPROXIMATE PARCEL BOUNDARY CENTERLINE -G -G"- UNDERGROUND CAS LINE EDGE OF GRAVEL . EASEMENT LINE LINE OF FURS OFLINFATING NERANDS CEIMFRUNE CREEK' EASEYIFNT CENTERLINE . -X-X-- FENCE LINE " EDGE OF BRUSH LINE Tl 1i OF 1SHEET .