Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Hearings Officer Packet - 02/19/2003
HEARINGS OFFICER Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Hearings Officer meetings by noon on the Friday prior to the meeting. Please call 503-639-4171, Ext. 2438 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments and qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. To request such services, please notify the City of Tigard of your need(s) by 5:00 p.m., no less than one (1) week prior to the meeting date at the same phone numbers listed above so that we can make the appropriate arrangements. Hearings are held In Town Hall at the City of Tigard at 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Staff Reports are available to the public 7 days prior to the hearing date. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC HEARING 2.1 ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH EXPANSION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2002-00006 ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2002-00043 ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2002-00044 The applicant is seeking approval for a phased expansion. The first phase would involve the renovation and minor addition to the middle school, a new gymnasium, and associated site work. The subsequent phase would involve construction of a new community center, parking revisions, and associated site work. LOCATION: 9905 SW McKenzie Street; WCTM 2S102BD, Tax Lot 100. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. 2.2 APPEAL OF CASH A CARRY STORE SDR2002-00017 APPEAL WrHDRAM M 3. OTHER BUSINESS 4. ADJOURNMENT All Information is Subject to Change tv WEDNESDAY - FEBRUARY 19, 2003 - 7:00 PM f • AGENDA ITEM NO. d. I 00 + . 0 Depending on the number of people wishing to testify, the Tigard Hearing's Officer may limit the amount of time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Hearing's Officer may further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Hearing's Officer to supplement oral testimony. AGENDA ITEM NO.: 2.1 DATE: FEBRUARY 19, 2003 FILE NAME: ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH EXPANSION CASE NOS.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2002-00006 ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2002-00043 ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2002-00044 APPLICANT: Ankrom Moisan Assoc. Architects OWNER: Roman Catholic Archbishop of Attn: Drew Rocker Portland in Oregon 6720 SW Macadam, Suite 100 2838 E. Burnside Portland, OR 97219 Portland, OR 97214 REQUEST: The applicant is seeking approval for a phased expansion. The first phase would involve the renovation and minor addition to the middle school, a new gymnasium, and associated site work. The subsequent phase would involve construction of a new community center, parking revisions, and associated site work. LOCATION: 9905 SW McKenzie Street; WCTM 2S102BD, Tax Lot 100. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR THE AGENDA ITEM INDICATED DIRECTLY ABOVE. AOF %6 0 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.1 (PAGE • OF I DATE: FEBRUARY 19.2003 PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND INCLUDE YOUR ZIP CODE Proponent - (Speaking in Favor) Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. 12'Y 1 ~c~7-U 5 i~ jok 'AJsd,✓ sT T16A 9'7 '1. 3 e.-, 3- r 4J -2ss/ Npe, Add esvj Zip Code and Phone No. 2-0 Nam ,/Address, Zip Code and Phone No. a 31 y Sw mlkvi' fj Cif T~jav-W, ok g7aa3 Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. Opponent - (Speaking Against) Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. r Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. r Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. I Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. Name, Address, Zip Code and Phone No. • 0 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503)684-0360 N otice ` -T 1018 0 Notic BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising 'city of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice 13125 S11 Hall r1vd. R'igard, Oregon 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit Accounts Payable AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) 1 Kathy Snyder being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of thA? ga rd -"'u a 1 a t-_ i n ^ 1,me s a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at Tigard in the aforesaid count yy and state; thattthe Public Hearing/ CUP2.002-On005.St.Anhonv Church Expansion a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for 01-IF successive and consecutive in the following issues: January 30,2003 Subscribed and sworn to efore me this 1 nth day of January, 2 0 0 3 OFFICIAL SEAL ROBIN A BURGESS Not Public for Oregon 6) NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO. 344589 My Commission Expires: MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 16, 2005 AFFIDAVIT 0 • The following will be considered by the Tigard Hearings Officer on Wednesday February 19, 2003 at 7:00 PM at the Tigard Civic Center Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. Both public oral and written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the Tigard Municipal Code and the rules of procedure adopted by the Council and available at City Hall or the rules of procedure set forth in Chapter 18.390. Testimony may be submitted in writing prior to or at the public hearing or verbally at the public hearing only. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior to the close of the hearing accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to afford the decision-maker an opportunity to respond to the issue precludes appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeal based on that issue. Failure to specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven (7) days prior to the hearing, and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division (staff contact: Brad Kilby) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 503-639-4171. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP)2002- 00006/ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2002-00043/ ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2002-00044 >ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH EXPANSION< • • REQUEST: The applicant is seeking' approval for a phased expansion. The first phase would involve the renovation and minor addition to the middle school, a new gymnasium, and associated site work. The subsequent phase would involve construction of a new community center, parking revisions, and associated site work. LOCATION: 9905 SW McKenzie Street; WCTM 2S102BD, Tax Lot 100. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. i s~ 9eY~ . ..ff'°' 1 ~ ✓•~i ( / VICINITY HAP i ,'f.i' \ CUPI04L00406 VAR2002.00043 VAR2002.00044 ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH MANSION f y C IS' •i . ✓ fi 614 TE, TT 10180 - Publish January 30, 2003. NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER, VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. CITY OF TIGARD Community (Development ShapingA (Better Community CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON WEDNESDAY. FEBRUARY 19.2003 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER AT 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NOS.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2002-00006 ADJUSTMENT (VAR)-2002-00043 ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2002-00044 FILE TITLE: ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH EXPANSION APPLICANT: Ankrom Moisan Assoc. Architects OWNER: Roman Catholic Archbishop of Attn: Drew Rocker Portland in Oregon 6720 SW Macadam, Suite 100 2838 E. Burnside Portland, OR 97219 Portland, OR 97214 REQUEST:. The applicant is seeking approval for a phased expansion. The first phase would involve the renovation and minor addition to the middle school, a new gymnasium, and associated site work. The subsequent phase would involve construction of a new community center, parking revisions, and associated site work. LOCATION: 9905 SW McKenzie Street; WCTM 2S102BD, Tax Lot 100. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 2438 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. 0 0 ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION LESS THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER-THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE. HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AN OPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25G) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25~) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER BRAD KILBY AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 OR BY E-MAIL Al bradley@ci.tigard.or.us. VICINITY MAP CUP2002 00006 VAR2002-00043 VAR2002-00044 114- ST. ANTHONY'S ll CHURCH EXPANSION N CiryofTiprd I • • BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by St. Anthony's Parish for a ) FINAL ORDER conditional use permit, variances and an adjustment for ) CUP 2002-00006 phased expansion of a church, school and accessory uses at ) VAR 2002-00043 & 44 9905 SW McKenzie Street in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) (St. Anthony's expansion) A. SUN "RY 1. The applicant, Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland represented by St. Anthony's Parish Priest Leslie Sieg and Ankrom Moisan Associated Architects' Drew Rocker, requests approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for a major modification to an existing church, school and accessory uses. 2. The site is Tax Lot 00100 (WCTM 1S 102BD). The site includes all but the southwest corner of the block bounded by Highway 99W, McKenzie Street, Grant Avenue and Johnson Street.I The site contains 63 acres according to the Staff Report and 7.6 acres according to the application. It is zoned R-12 (Medium Density Residential). It is developed with church and school. An elementary school at the northeast corner of the site dates to 1931. West of the school are a convent, now used as a kindergarten, and two portables. In roughly the middle of the site is the Kelly Center, which is where middle school is conducted. The church (with a capacity of 700 seats in the main sanctuary) and rectory are in the southwest corner of the site. The northwest corner of the site is a playfield. The applicant applied for and the City approved more recent improvements as provided by code.2 The school now has capacity for 380 students from kindergarten through middle school. There are 249 parking spaces on the site, including eleven spaces that extend into the McKenzie Street right of way in front of the church. 3. The applicant now proposes a two-phase improvement plan. The applicant identified as the first phase as "IA" and to the second phase as "IB". During phase IA, the applicant will relocate two kindergarten rooms from the northeast portion of the site to the middle school building, modify that building to accommodate those children and other program changes, and build a new gymnasium southeast of the existing middle school building, among other changes. The phase IA changes could accommodate 50 more students, generating about 5 more peak-hour vehicle trips, according to a traffic study prepared for the applicant. In phase IB, the applicant will build a 15,000-square foot community center, more on-site vehicle parking and a circulation connection between Johnson and Grant Avenue that will facilitate dropping-off of students, among other features. Most students are driven to and from school individually or in family groups, because there is no school-provided busing. The applicant will be required to improve Johnson and McKenzie Street frontages mostly as part of phase IB, but will not be adding lanes to abutting public streets. Although traffic queues on Johnson Street and Grant Avenue during the AM peal hour, a traffic study shows affected streets and intersections can accommodate traffic from each phase of the development. In phase IB, the applicant will displace 53 off-street parking spaces (including the eleven spaces that extend into 1 The applicant owns other parcels where it has developed parking for the church and school uses, e.g., at 9870 SW Johnson Street and 12515 SW Grant Avenue (WCTM 2S1 02BB, tax lots 01700 and 01600). 2 C 20-82 and SDR 26-81 approved a community center on the site. CU 3-85 approved expansion of the school. In 1992, the City approved additional school expansion. In 1997, the City authorized two off-site parking locations (CUP 97-0007). CUP 2002-00006 and VAR 2002-00043 & 44 Hearings Officer Final Order (St. Anthony's Expansion) Page 1 • • McKenzie Street). Additional spaces will be added on- or off-site as needed. 4. The applicant proposed two variances and an adjustment. The applicant proposed one variance to substitute street trees off-site (at parking lots owned by the applicant along McKenzie and Grant to the west) for trees required along the north side of McKenzie Street on the site, at least pending phase IB. A second variance was proposed to reduce the number of bicycle parking stalls required for the school to one-half of the standard requirement, principally because most children carpool to and from the school from a relatively wide region. At the public hearing, the applicant requested an adjustment to allow the comer of the gymnasium to extend two feet into the front yard setback along McKenzie Street as illustrated on preliminary plans. 5. City hearings officer Larry Epstein (the "hearings officer") held a duly noticed public hearing regarding the application. City staff recommended conditional approval of the CUP, deferral of the street tree requirement and approval of the bicycle storage place variance and adjustment for the gymnasium comer. Two witnesses testified for the applicant and accepted the findings and conditions of approvals recommended by City staff. One neighbor testified peak traffic due to the school effectively blocks Johnson Street and Grant Avenue, and sought an enforceable means to prevent such congestion. Witnesses for the applicant and the City considered how the applicant could better address the peak hour traffic congestion until phase IB improvements do so more effectively, and agreed such measures were feasible. No one else appeared at the hearing or submitted written testimony about the application. The applicant waived its right to have the record held open. The hearings officer closed the record at the end of the hearing and announced his intention to approve the conditional use permit subject to conditions recommended by staff with modifications. 6. The principle issue in dispute involves the impact of school-related traffic on Johnson Street and Grant Avenue until phase IB, when projected improvements will significantly reduce the potential congestion caused by school-related traffic. The hearings officer is persuaded that it is feasible for the applicant to reduce peak hour traffic congestion as part of phase IA at least in proportion to the impact of the increased use of the site due to development authorized in that phase, and a condition is imposed to ensure the applicant makes a timely, effective effort to do so, while delegating some discretion about how it is done. 7. For the reasons stated herein, the hearings officer approves the conditional use permit for the phased expansion plan, one variance application and an adjustment, subject to the conditions at the end of this final order. B. HEARING AND RECORD 1. The hearings officer received testimony at the public hearing about this applicatoon on February ry, 20"3. Hil exhibits and records or testimony are riled with the Tigard Department of Community Development. At the beginning of the hearing, the hearings officer made the declaration required by ORS 197.763. The hearings officer disclaimed any ex parte contacts, bias or conflicts of interest. The hearings officer disclosed that he had visited the site in the context of prior cases and general commuting and invited witnesses to question and rebut his observations. The following is a summary by the hearings officer of selected testimony offered at the public hearing in this matter. 2. City planner Brad Kilby summarized the Staff Report to the Hearings Officer dated February 12, 2003 (the "Staff Report"). He responded to concerns about traffic by observing phase IA will add only five peak hour trips and 50 daily trips. He noted that a CUP 2002-00006 and VAR 2002-00043 & 44 Hearings Officer Final Order (St. Anthony's Expansion) Page 2 • • parking analysis is required before phase IB to ensure enough parking will be provided excluding the 11 spaces on the McKenzie Street right of way that will be lost due to improvements required for that phase. Those improvements also will include curb and sidewalk on the site's Johnson Street frontage, but the City does not recommend that the applicant install additional lanes on Johnson Street, because the congestion caused by school-related traffic is short-term and has not been a hazard based on accident statistics. He discussed the potential for allowing a two-foot adjustment for the comer of the gymnasium under CDC 18.370.020. Planning Manager Dick Bewersdorff also testified about traffic queuing and the adjustment. 3. Drew Rocker initially accepted the Staff Report but requested a two-foot adjustment for the comer of the gymnasium given the small area involved. He explained why the hearings officer can and should grant such an adjustment. He introduced an exhibit illustrating how the proposed solid waste storage enclosure to be situated in a sight-obscured area next to the new gymnasium will comply with applicable standards. He explained another solid waste storage area serves buildings on the north part of the site. 4. Dave Leary, a neighbor to the west, testified convincingly and eloquently about his observations of traffic congestion on Johnson Street and Grant Avenue during 15 to 20 minutes daily. His observations of congestion were not challenged by the applicant, and were confirmed by Mr. Bewersdorff from personal experience. Mr. Leary opined that the congestion violates parking regulations and is unsafe, although he did not explain precisely how except that it per se violates city traffic law and could lead to imprudent behavior by drivers. He acknowledged the problem is short-term and of long-standing. He argued the applicant should have to provide a readily accessible off-street area where parents can drop- off students without obstructing Johnson Street or Grant Avenue. 5. In response to Mr. Leary, Mr. Rocker explained circulation on and around the site in more detail. He noted there are two traffic patterns for drop-offs. The kindergarten and elementary school traffic enters from and to Johnson eastbound using basically one lane on the site. Middle school traffic enters a small area to and from Grant Avenue. 6. Father Leslie Sieg testified that two kindergarten classrooms will be relocated from the northeast part of the site to the middle school building in phase IA. He and Mr. Rocker described how an additional on-site lane could be created to increase the number of vehicles that can drop off children at the same time, reducing congestion on Johnson Street until phase IB. They also discussed the long-term solution created by phase IB, when a long mid-block extension between Johnson and Grant will greatly increase the distance within which vehicles dropping off children can wait off of the public rights of way, noting that temporary improvement of some of that area also could relieve congestion on Johnson Street and/or Grant Avenue if necessary. 7. Mr. Rocker waived the applicant's right to hold open the record after the hearing for a closing written argument. 8. The hearings officer closed the public portion of the hearing and closed the record at the end of the hearing. He announced an intention to approve the application for the conditional use permit, to approve one variance and to defer compliance with the standard addressed in the other variance. He announced an intention to take under advisement whether an adjustment can and should be granted to the front yard setback standard as it applies to the proposed gymnasium and how to address in a condition the concern about mitigating the impact of phase IA on traffic congestion on Johnson Street and Grant Avenue. CUP 2002-00006 and VAR 2002-00043 & 44 Hearings Officer Final Order (St. Anthony's Expansion) Page 3 • • C. DISCUSSION 1. City staff provided basic facts about the site and its vicinity and existing and proposed uses in the Staff Report. They recommended the hearings officer approve the application for the conditional use permit and one of the variances, and deny the other variances, based on the applicable standards and responsive findings in section VII of the Staff Report and subject to conditions of approval in section II of the Staff Report. The applicant accepted the findings and recommended conditions with the exceptions described more below. City staff also agreed the hearings officer could grant an adjustment to allow the corner of the gymnasium to extend 2 feet into the front setback, and there is substantial evidence in the record to support findings approving such an adjustment. For the most part, the hearings officer adopts as his own the findings and conclusions in the Staff Report. For the sake of efficiency, the final order does not repeat what is in the Staff Report, although the final order often summarizes and refines what is in the Staff Report. 2. The hearings officer largely agrees with the findings in the Staff Report. a. Substantial evidence in the record shows the proposal does or can comply with the applicable standards and criteria for a conditional use permit and for a variance to bicycle parking standards. The hearings officer relies on the Staff Report for relevant findings and citation to supporting evidence on these issues. b. There is not substantial evidence to show waiver of street tree requirements is warranted, even with the thoughtful and creative approach of substituting trees elsewhere. Nothing precludes compliance with the street tree requirements on the site. The rationale for the variance to save 11 parking spaces is based on a flawed premise. The applicant is not entitled to use the public right of way for private parking purposes. Given the narrow width of McKenzie Street abutting the site, street trees are all the more important. The applicant has room on this site and adjoining properties where adequate parking can be provided. Also the applicant failed to show that trip reduction measures have been employed to minimize parking needs, or that there is anything special about the parking that extends into the right of way that warrants its, preservation beyond phase IA (i.e., before completion of phase IB). An offer to place trees elsewhere, without more, is not a suitable substitute. City staff have proposed an eminently reasonable approach of allowing the applicant to defer planting the street trees along McKenzie until phase IB requires removal of the parking spaces that intrude onto that right of way. The hearings officer agrees with that approach. 3. The Staff Report notes that the gymnasium extends into a required setback.3 In the report, Staff take the position that the applicant should be required to comply with the setback. However, after further consideration at the hearing, and a review of the relevant procedural and substantive standards, City staff concluded at the hearing that the lesser setback proposed for the gymnasium is so small (being a 2-foot corner of the building), that it has a relatively small burden of proof. There are peculiarities that relate to the site that warrant the adjustment, principally the limitations imposed by the existing buildings on the site and the adjoining rights of way. The variances will not increase adverse impacts of the development on natural or manmade systems, given that ample room will remain for access with adequate sight distance, landscaping, transitions and maintenance. The gym corner may well qualify for a variance. However it is clear that the variance is not more than 25% of a front yard requirement and does not significantly increase building coverage. It will not affect or impede emergency access, because it does not obstruct sight distance. It is the 3 CDC 18.330.050.B.8.b(2) provides that the minimum street-side side yard setback for a school is 20 feet. CUP 2002-00006 and VAR 2002-00043 & 44 Hearings Officer Final Order (St. Anthony's Expansion) Page 4 0 • least variance required to achieve the physical needs of the applicant to the building in question. Construction of the gym comer as proposed will not result in the preservation or loss of trees per se and will result in implementation of a cogent landscaping plan for the affected area. For the foregoing reasons, it complies with the standards for an adjustment to setback standards under CDC 18.370.020.B.2. Therefore whether a variance could be granted for the gym extension is moot. 4. The Staff Report discusses the need for the applicant to address more clearly how solid waste will be collected and stored temporarily on-site pending pick-up by a franchised hauler. The applicant largely did so at the hearing. Conditions of approval should be modified accordingly. 5. Under CDC 18.760, the existing use of the church and school can be continued without being brought into compliance with other applicable standards of the code. Conditions of approval can be imposed to ensure the modification of the church and school do not increase the extent to which the use violates an otherwise applicable standard. 6. CDC 18.130.040.A.1 requires that a conditional use be situated on a site "the size and dimensions [of which] provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use." In this case, the hearings officer finds that the site is large enough and of a size and shape to comply with applicable CDC standards, except for the one variance and adjustment, which the hearings officer also finds are warranted as described or incorporated above. a. The site is large enough and has dimensions suitable for accommodating the traffic impacts of the use, but the applicant failed to persuade the hearings officer that it is using the site to best mitigate the impacts that have occurred for some time and will increase, albeit marginally, when phase IA is completed and until phase IB is completed The hearings officer finds that school-related traffic congests Johnson Street and Grant Avenue for 15 to 20-minute periods daily, based on the traffic study prepared for the applicant. Although the engineer who prepared the report and City staff who reviewed it minimized the significance of the congestion, the evidence does not compel the hearings officer to disregard that impact; to the contrary, the impact is relevant. b. If phase IB was imminent, the hearings officer might find the continuing adverse impact caused by the school-related congestion was so slight that it should not preclude proceeding with phase IA. However there is no certainty when phase IB will begin or be completed. In the meantime it is difficult to quantify the relative impact of phase IA on the problem. But there will be some impact. A proportionate response by the applicant is warranted as a condition of approval of phase IA. . c. The applicant can take several practicable responses. One discussed at the hearing is to increase the number of lanes for the drop-off vehicles entering the site eastbound on Johnson Street, now that the kindergartners will not be in the route of that traffic. Another discussed at the hearing is to increase the loading area off Grant Street for the middle schoolers. Other measures might include increased use of carpooling or vans, graveling all or a part of the cross-block route planned in phase IB, or designating more remote drop-off points at other school-owned properties and escorting children to the school. The point is that the site is large enough to accommodate peak AM traffic congestion, because additional routes can be created, managed and/or improved to move traffic more quickly off of public streets, thereby reducing or eliminating congestion. d. A condition of approval is warranted requiring the applicant to propose one or more specific means of reducing AM peak hour congestion. The planning manager should review and approve a plan that he or she finds has a reasonable likelihood of CUP 2002-00006 and VAR 2002-00043 & 44 Hearings Officer Final Order (St. Anthony's Expansion) Page 5 0 • reducing congestion on Johnson Street and Grant Avenue. The City should monitor or enlist the applicant to monitor the success of the measure(s) used to reduce congestion at least for a reasonable period of time after it/they take(s) effect. The results of this monitoring should be available to the public on request at no more than the cost of production and should be considered in any future review of phase IB. The planning manager should be authorized to suspend monitoring when he or she finds it is no longer warranted to ensure compliance with the condition. 7. Adoption of recommended conditions of approval as amended will ensure final plans are submitted consistent with the applicable City approval and development criteria and standards and will prevent, reduce or mitigate potential adverse impacts of the development consistent with the requirements of the Tigard Community Development Code. D. CONCLUSIONS The hearings officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit, bicycle parking variance and building setback adjustment do or can comply with the applicable approval criteria and standards of the Tigard Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to ensure such compliance occurs. The hearings officer also concludes that the applicant failed to sustain the burden of proof that the proposed variance to the street tree requirements complies with the applicable approval standards for such a variance; however, deferral of street tree planting until phase IB is warranted. Substantial evidence in the record and the reasonable interpretations of relevant ambiguous CDC provisions by the hearings officer support these conclusions. E. DECISION 1. The hearings officer hereby denies VAR 2002-00044 (regarding street trees on the McKenzie Street frontage of the site), but authorizes the applicant to defer planting of those trees until directed by the City as part of the improvement of the McKenzie Street frontage of the site consistent with this final order. 2. The hearings officer further hereby approves CUP 2002-00006 (phases IA and IB of the St. Anthony's expansion), VAR 2002-00043 (a 5001o variance to the minimum number of bicycle parking spaces), and a 2-foot adjustment for the southwest corner of the gymnasium, subject to the conditions in section II of the Staff Report, with the following amendments: a. Condition of approval 5 is hereby amended to read as follows: 5. Before the City issues a permit for phase IB construction, the applicant shall submit and receive approval of a revised site plan showing that the resulting development will comply with minimum off-street parking standards in TDC Chapter 18.765 for all new parking spaces on the site. Parking in the McKenzie Street right of way does not count toward those requirements. On the date of this decision, 233 on-site parking spaces are required. b. Condition of approval 6 is hereby amended to read as follows: 6. Before the City issues a site permit for phase IB, or three years from the date of this final order plus extensions authorized by law, whichever is first, the applicant shall abandon the eleven parking CUP 2002-00006 and VAR 2002-00043 & 44 Hearings Officer Final Order (St. Anthony's Expansion) Page 6 • • spaces that encroach into the McKenzie Street right of way and apply for a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit to improve the north half of the McKenzie Street right of way abutting the site to the extent not already improved to applicable standards. c. Condition of approval 26 is hereby added to read as follows: 26. Prior to issuance of occupancy permits for development authorized in phase IA, the applicant shall submit and receive approval of a plan to reduce AM peak hour congestion on Johnson Street and Grant Avenue. The plan shall include one or more of the means to reduce congestion discussed herein or other means the planning manager finds can be effective. The plan also shall include a means of measuring the effect of implementing the plan. The planning manager shall approve a plan that he or she finds has a reasonable likelihood of reducing congestion on Johnson Street and Grant Avenue and of being monitored. The City should monitor or enlist the applicant to monitor the success of the measure(s) used to reduce congestion at least for a reasonable period of time after it/they take(s) effect. The results of this monitoring shall be made available to the public on request at no more than the cost of production and should be considered in any future review of phase IB. The planning manager may suspend or waive further monitoring when he or she finds it is no longer warranted, (e.g., because congestion has declined or at least not increased in duration). Hearings Officer CUP 2002-00006 and VAR 2002-00043 & 44 Hearings Officer Final Order (St. Anthony's Expansion) Page 7 • "EXHIBIT A" PARTIES OF RECORD (Written Public Testimony received at the hearing) FEB-19-2003 13:12 ANKROM MOISAN ARCHITECT S ANKROM MOYSAN ASSOCIATED 503 245 7710 P.01i02 FAX MESSAGE ARCHITECTS Date: 2119/03 To: Brad Kilby - Firm: city of Tigard Fax Number: (503) 684-7297 Planning (Dept. Project: St. Anthony's Project No.: 211275.2 No. of Pages 2 Message: Trash/recycle enclosure. The attached drawings provide additional information that indicates the trash/recycle enclosure meets the dimensional requirements of the code according to the minimum standard method. I will bring (10) copies to the hearing. Please let me know if I need to change anything. If I understand the other methods for determining area, there is potential to get a reduction. However, since there are presently two locations for trash/recycling - the other serving the school buildings on SW Johnson and two accounts with Pride - its too complicated for Ph. 1 A to figure out. We propose to provide a similar analysis of a separate trash/recycling enclosure to verify compliance for the community center with other Ph. 1 B documents. Distribution: Fr. Leslie Sieg fax (503) 624-2364 Steve Miller fax (503) 723-5960 From: Drew Rocker please call if you had any problems in receiving this transmission or if there are pages missing. 6720 SW Macadam, Suite 100, Portland. Oregon 97219. 503/245-7100. FAX 503/2457710 Principals: Stewart Anlaom, Thomas Moisan, David N, vonadu, Lorraine Kellow, Jcff Hamilton. Karen Bowery NKROM MOISAN AROHITECT S A B_19-2003 13:12 fAl*e 14WA OWL *P4 l~ t Asl to too ~ ~ it • EXHIBjT A ~r Alma--- TOTA1- "EXHIBIT C" WRITTEN TESTIMONY (Applicant's materials and pertinent correspondence filed with Hearings Officer prior to Public Hearing.) 0 Agenda Item: Hearing Date: STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OR • 2.1 February 19. 2003 , CITY OF TIOARD Community (Development EGON Shqping,4 (Better Community 120 DAYS = 5/06/2003 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION CASE NOS: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) CUP2002-00006 Adjustment (VAR) VAR2002-00043 Adjustment (VAR) VAR2002-00044 APPLICANT/ Roman Catholic Archbishop APPLICANT'S Ankrom Moisan OWNER: Of Portland in Oregon REPRESENTATIVE: Associated Architects 2838 E. Burnside Attn: Drew Rocker Portland, OR 97214 6720 SW Macadam Portland, OR 97219 PROPOSAL: The applicant is seeking approval for a phased expansion. The first phase would involve the renovation and minor addition to the middle school, a new gymnasium, and associated site work. The subsequent phase would involve construction of a new community center, parking revisions, and associated site work. The applicant is also seeking an adjustment to the requirement to provide street trees along SW McKenzie, and an adjustment to the bicycle parking standards. LOCATION: 9905 SW McKenzie Street; WCTM 1S102BD, Tax Lot 00100. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN and ZONING DESIGNATION: R-12, Medium-Density Residential District. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Hearings Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Parking Adjustment will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City and meets the Approval Standards as outlined in this report. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the Amended Conditional use and the parking adjustment, but recommends DENIAL of the street tree adjustment, subject to the following recommended Conditions of Approval: ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 1 OF 27 CUP2002-00006NAR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2/19/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the banning Department ra i y, 639-4Tn, ext..24MFtor review and approval: Prior to any site work, the applicant shall comply with the protection measures prescribed by the City Arborist. The applicant shall provide the City Arborist with a construction sequence including installation and removal of tree protection devices, clearing, grading, and paving. 2. Prior to any site work, The applicant shall notify the City Arborist when tree protection measures are in place so that he may verify that the measures will function properly prior to construction. 3. Prior to the issuance of any site permits for phase 1 B, the applicant shall provide City staff with a revised landscape plan demonstrating compliance with TDC Section 18.745.050 (E)(1)(a). The applicant shall include placement of trees within the interior of all new parking areas throughout the site at a ratio of one tree for every seven parking spaces and located within islands that are three feet wide and protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. 4. Prior to the issuance of any permits on phase 1 B, the applicant shall provide the City with a landscaping plan to show compliance with TDC Section 18.745.040 (Street Trees). The revision shall include street trees along the entire frontages of SW Grant Street, SW McKenzie Street, and SW Johnson Street. 5. Prior to the issuance of any site permits for phase 1B construction, the applicant shall provide the City with a parking plan that shows compliance with the minimum parking requirements of 233 spaces on site. The plan shall demonstrate compliance with the dimensional and material requirements ofpTDC Chapter 18.765 for all new parking spaces on site. In the event that phase 1 B is not constructed within the approval period of this decision, the Church shall abandon the eleven spaces that encroach into the right-of-way along SW McKenzie, and make all necessary improvements to the parking areas on site to bring them into compliance with the Tigard Development Code. 6. Prior to the issuance of building permits for the new structure, the applicant shall provide revised plans that illustrate compliance with the 20-foot side yard setback along the southeast corner of the gymnasium. 7. Prior to the issuance of final occupancy permits for improvements in phase 1A, the applicant shall provide the City with financial assurance for the value of the required landscaping. 8. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide a narrative detailing which one of the four methods will be chosen for solid waste and recyclable storage. A detail of the enclosure along with any other necessary elements shall be submitted. "See Section 18.755.040 (C-F) The applicant shall provide the City with a new location or the facility outside of the front yard of the facility. If a new site cannot be found, the applicant shall seek a variance to the location standards of the TDC. 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall revise the parking plan to comply with the Oregon Uniform Building Code and show seven (7) ADA accessible spaces as opposed to the six that are identified on the current site plan. 10. Prior to issuing, building permits for either phase, the applicant shall submit a detailed lighting plan, hat shows no projection off site and complies with crime prevention requirements of the TDC Section 18.360.090(10). ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 2 OF 27 CUP2002-00006NAR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2/19/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 2471) for review and approval: 11. Prior to issuance of a site permit in Phase 1A, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover the sanitary sewer and storm drainage taps to main lines in Johnson Street, the water tap in McKenzie Street and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tiaard.or.us). 12. Prior to issuance of a site permit in Phase 113, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover the half-street improvement in SW Johnson Street and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to CPal of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City l and the City's web page (www.ci.tiaard.or.us). 13. A PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 14. Prior to issuance of the site permit for Phase 1A, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). 15. Prior to issuance of the site permit for Phase 1 B, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). 16. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public at the intersection of Grant Avenue/Johnson Street to provide a ROW radius of 30 feet. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 17. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public at the intersection of Grant Avenue/McKenzie Street to provide a ROW radius of 25 feet. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 18. The applicant shall provide an on-site water uality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00- 7 . Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department ( rian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 3 OF 27 CUP2002-00006NAR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2/19/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 0 0 Submit to the Planning Department (Brad Kilby, 639-4171, ext. 2434) for review and approval: 19. Prior to the issuance of final occupancy permits for improvements in phase 1A, the applicant shall provide the City with financial assurance for the value of the required landscaping. 20. All site improvements must be made in accordance with the approved plans for each phase of the project. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 2471) for review and approval: 21. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 22. Prior to a final building inspection in Phase 1 B, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 23. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW McKenzie Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $12,925.00 and it shall be paid prior to a final building inspection. 24. If Phase 1 B is served from overhead utility lines along either Grant Avenue or Johnson Street, there will be an additional requirement for undergrounding of the overhead lines, or payment of the fee in-lieu. 25. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality faci ity for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 36 MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION SHALL RENDER THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION VOID. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Historv: St. Anthony's Catholic Church has occupied the site for quite some time. The site has grown and evolved over a long period of time. The Church sought conditional use review on three separate occasions. The first approval was rendered for the Kelley Community Center (CU20-82 & SDR26-81). The second approval was for a classroom expansion of a modular that was placed on site as a temporary use in 1983 (CU3-85). In 1992, the church received conditional use approval for a 4,230 square foot expansion that included the addition of three new classrooms and a library addition. There have been several other miscellaneous permits issued for structural updates, and for some off-site parking areas. ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 4 OF 27 CUP2002-00006NAR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2119/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER s ~ Vicinitv Information: The site is zoned R-12 which is a medium density designation in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Properties located to the south, east, and west of this site are zoned either R-12 or C-G, which is a commercial designation in the Comprehensive Plan. Properties located to the north of the site are zoned R-4.5, a low density designation in the Comprehensive Plan. The site is surrounded by a mixture of single-family residences and small businesses. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is currently developed with the existing church and several ancillary buildings to accommodate the school. The proposal is for a phased expansion that would involve the renovation and minor addition to the middle school, a new gymnasium, and associated site work. The subsequent phase would involve construction of a new community center, parking revisions, and associated site work. The applicant is also seeking an adjustment to the requirement to provide street trees along SW McKenzie, and an adjustment to the bicycle parking standards. SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES. PERMITS AND USE Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 Lists the Use Categories. The applicant is proposing to amend the existing conditional use permit to allow for phased construction of a new gymnasium, an addition to the middle school, and a new community building along with the associated site work. Churches are permitted by Conditional Use in all zones. The adjustments that have been requested are typically reviewed administratively. However, when different requests are reviewed concurrently, the highest review autho2i renders the decision on all matters in the application. In this case, the application is subject to a public hearing before the City of Tigard Hearings Officer. Summary Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 Defines the decision-making type to which the land-use application is assigned. The proposed amendment to the existing Conditional Use permit is a Type III-HO decision. The proposed adjustment to the bicycle parking requirement is a Type II review, and the proposed adjustment to the street tree requirement is a Type I review. SECTION V. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS The Tigard Community Development Code requires that property owners within 500 feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal, and be given an opportunity for written comments and/or oral testimony prior to a decision being made. In addition, the applicant is required to post the site with notice of the public hearing. Staff has verified that the site is posted. Staff has not received any comments from any property owners as of the date of this staff report. SECTION VI. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case, in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this report are as follows: A. Specific Conditional Use Criteria General Approval Criteria) ~/oplicalble dditional Conditions of Approval) B. Development Code Standards 18.330 Conditional Uses) 18.360 Site Development Review) 18.370 kVariances and Adjustments) ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 5 OF 27 2/19/2003 PUBLIC HEARING C U P2002-00006NA R2002-00043NAR2002-00044 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 18.510 tResidential Zoning 18.705 Access, Egress & Circulation) 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid-Waste & Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) C. Additional Site Development Review Approval Standards D. Street and Utilitv Improvement Standards (18.810) E. Impact StudVJ18.3901 SECTION VII. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.330.010.A states that the purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and analysis. Section 18.330.020.A states that a request for approval for a new conditional use shall be processed as a Type III-HO procedure, as regulated by Chapter 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.330.03ITA and subject to other requirements in Chapter 18.330. General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use: Section 18.330.030: The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; The existing site size is 6.3 acres in size. This report evaluates the proposal and necessary review criteria for the site. The site size appears adequate for the needs of the proposed expansion. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features; There are no apparent natural features on this site, and the size, shape, and location are not extraordinary. The site is located on the boundary of the R4.5 zoning district, but is surrounded by a mixture of businesses and single-family residences. The site is suitable for this location. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; and According to the comments received, all public facilities including streets, storm and sanitary sewers, and water can adequately serve the site. This criterion is satisfied. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. The following table provides the dimensional standards in the R-12 zone, the additional dimensional requirements for religious facilities are specified in the Conditional Use Standards of Section 18.3q 0.050.B.9 and the dimensions proposed for this development. (see table on the following page) ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 6 OF 27 CUP2002-00006NAR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2119/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • STANDARD Minimum Lot Size Minimum Lot Width Minimum Setbacks Front yard Side facing street on corner & through lots Side yard Rear yard Maximum Height Maximum Site Coverage [2] Minimum Landscape Requirement [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. is R-12 CONDITIONAL USE REQUIREMENT 13,050 sq. ft. 120,000 sq. ft n/a n/a 20 ft 25 ft 20 ft 20 ft loft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 35 ft. 1 SAME AS R-12 80% 1 SAME AS R-12 20% 1 SAME AS R-12 PROPOSED 1 274,428 sq. ft 300+ ft 23 ft Non-conforming 35 along Grant 18ft Non-conforming 27ft 8in 1 53% [2] 1 47% The application fails to meet the dimensional requirements of both the underlying zone and the conditional use dimensional requirements. In order to meet the conditional use requirements, the applicant should be conditioned to meet the 20-foot side yard setback along the, southeast corner of the gymnasium. The Front and Rear yard setbacks that are compromised by the existing structures on the site including the offices and elementary school are non-conforming According to the non-conforming chapter of the Tigard Development Code (TDC) 18.760.040(C, the non-conforming structure may continue to be used, enlarged, or altered, as long as it does not increase the non-conformity of the structure, as long as it is not moved, or as long as it is not destroyed by any means beyond 60% of its assessed value. FINDING: The expansion plans for the construction of the new gymnasium illustrate that the structure sets within the required 20-foot setback. CONDITION: Prior to the issuance of buildin permits for the new structure, the applicant shall provide revised plans that 1 lustrate compliance with the 20-foot side yard setback along the southeast corner of the gymnasium. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this Code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met or can be conditioned to be satisfied. The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Community Development Code: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Development Review; 1837Q, Variances and Adjustments; 18.390, Decision Making Procedures- 18.510, Residential Zoning Districts; 18.705 Access, Egress and Circulation- 18.725, ffnvironmental Performance Standards; 18.745 Landscaping and Screening; 18.x'55, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage; 18.765, bff-Street Parking; 18.790, Tree Removal- 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas- and T8.810, Street and Utility Improvement Standards. The development standards and requirements of these chapters are addressed further in this report. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following chapters: 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710, Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations- 18.720, Design Compatibility. Standards; 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standard; 18.740, Historic Overlay; (8.742, Home Occupations- 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations; 18.760, Nonconforming Situations; 18.7K Sensitive Lands; 18.780, Temporary Uses- 18.797 Water Resources Overlay District; and 18.798, Wireless Communications racilities. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is implemented by the Community Development Code. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan policies are, therefore, assured by satisfaction of the applicable development standards of the development code as addressed within this report. ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 7 OF 27 CUP2002-00006NAR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2/19/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER FINDING: Based on the analysis above, and the condition imposed on the development, the General Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use have been satisfied. Additional Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use. Section saes a e earings Authority may impose conditions on the approval of a conditional use, which are found necessary to ensure the use is compatible with other uses in the vicinit and that the impact of the proposed use on the surrounding uses and public faciNlies is minimized. These conditions may include, but are not limited to the following: Limiting the hours, days, place and/or manner of operation; The majority of activities for the Church occur on Sundays and the school operates on the weekdays. A search of the City's code enforcement records shows no complaints against the existing church operations. Staff does not find any justification to impose conditions limiting the hours, days, and/or manner of operation. Requiring design features, which minimize environmental impacts such as noise, vibration, air pollution, glare, odor and/or dust; The hazards related to odor, dust, noise, glare, air pollution, and vibration can be mitigated through the design of the building and the buffering and landscaping of the use that has been proposed. Those hazards that are inherent during construction will be held to the same standards as other construction within the City of Tigard as regulated by the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC). All of these items will be subject to code enforcement review if the applicant exceeds the allowed levels. Requiring additional setback areas, lot area, and/or lot depth or width; The buffer requirements are discussed further in this report. Limiting the building height, size or lot coverage, and/or location on the site; Based on the plans submitted, the applicant has designed and placed the building such that it meets the underlying zone requirements except for the side yard setback along the SE corner of the gymnasium. A condition has been recommended previously in this report to ensure that this setback is met. Designating the size, number, location and/or design of vehicle access points; The applicant is proposing to modify an existing access along SW McKenzie for a one way drop off point with phase 1A, and an access along SW Grant and Johnson in phase 1 B. The accesses have been reviewed by the City of Tigard engineer, and his comments and recommendations have been incorporated into this report where appropriate. Requiring street right-of-way to be dedicated and street(s) to be improved; Street dedications have been requested and are addressed later in this report. Requiring landscaping, screening, drainage and/or surfacing of parking and loading areas; Landscaping, screening, drainage, and parking have been addressed individually and in detail later in this report. Limiting the number, size, location, height and/or lighting of signs; There are no new signs proposed at this time, and the applicant has indicated that any new signage will be applied for at a later date. Compliance with the sign requirements for the underlying zone will be considered once an application is submitted. ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 8 OF 27 CUP2002-00006NAR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2/19/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • 0 Limiting or setting standards for the location and/or intensity of outdoor lighting; Li hting has been proposed and rather than addressing it twice, will be addressed under the Si a Development Review Criteria later in this report. Requiring berms, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for their installation and maintenance; Staff will address screening and landscaping later in this report. Requiring and designating the size, height, location and/or materials for fences; No new fences are proposed with this application, and there are no screening requirements that would necessarily require fencing with the exception of the trash receptacles. This criterion is addressed in more detail under landscaping and screening, and mixed solid waste and recycling. Requiring the protection and preservation of existing trees, soils, vegetation, watercourses, habitat areas and/or drainage areas; Some of the trees on site are scheduled for removal to accommodate construction. The applicant has provided a tree preservation plan that will be discussed further in this report. There are no watercourses, habitat areas, drainage areas, or vegetation other than domesticated that will be affected by this proposal. Requiring the dedication of sufficient open land area for a greenway adjoining and within the floodplain when land form alterations and development are allowed within the 100-year floodplain; and This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain; therefore, a condition is not necessary. Requiring the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. This development is not adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, therefore, a condition is not necessary. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Site Development Review - Chapter 18.360: The Site eve opment Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Variances and Adjustments - Chapter 18.370: The applicant has requests an . justment to the street tree requirements, and an ~A;l 1~+mo"F 4^ r^,41 Ins +ho hininlo m~A inn roniremon~ hvi A()01_ C~nh .rlic ~mon4 ie rlensec erg ouJu0u 1 ic1 n w i cuu~,c a is uwy~.ic Nai FXn iy cyun ci i ~ci i~ vy V%J iu. L-a%.i 1 auJu0u 1 ici n 10 u0~.u00~u in detail in the following discussion. Adjustments for street tree requirements are permitted as long as the following criteria are satisfied: If the location of a proposed tree would cause potential problems with existing utility lines; The applicant has requested the adjustment in order to preserve parking that encroaches into the right-of-way. As discussed elsewhere in this report, staff concurs that these improvements could be delayed until construction of phase 1 B but there are several examples throughout the City where street trees have been planted despite the presence of overhead utility lines and the City Arborist can recommend varieties of trees that can thrive in this environment. This standard is not satisfied. ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 9 OF 27 CUP2002-00006NAR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2/19/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • 0 If the tree would cause visual clearance problems; There is no evidence in the record to suggest that planting the required street trees would interfere with the visual clearance standards. This criterion is not satisfied. Or if there is not adequate space in which to plant street trees. With phase 1A, staff would agree that planting the street trees would eliminate some opportunities for off street parking, however, the applicant has adequate space to enlarge the parking areas on the northeast portion of the site with construction of phase 1 B. Therefore, staff would recommend that the hearings officer apply the requirement for street trees along SW McKenzie at the time that the improvements are made for phase 1 B. FINDING: The proposal does not meet the criterion required to justify the street tree adjustment, and a condition has been recommended later in this report to meet the street tree requirements. The Director may approve a reduction of required bicycle parking per Section 18.765.050.E by means of Type 11 procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, if the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed use by its nature would be reasonably anticipated to generate a lesser need for bicycle parking. The applicant is proposing a 49% adjustment to provide for only 18 of the required 35 spaces as dictated by a 700 seat capacity within the main sanctuary. The applicant maintains that St. Anthony's is not a public school, and few of the children that attend live within bicycle range of the school. The Church has also indicated that a large majority of students arrive at the school by auto. The Church states that the current bike parking spaces are seldom used. In an earlier conversation with Tri-Met, Jillian Detweiller, Transit Planner, indicated that she was meetingg with the applicant's representative to discuss transit use and incentives. She stated that sloe would provide comments prior to the hearing. The bicycle parking standards are imposed to meet the needs of the population that is to be served by the facility. The seldom use of the existing spaces, and a regional student base would suggest that the facility does have a lesser need for bicycle parking. FINDING: The church is a regional institution that can be expected to generate a lesser need for bicycle parking, and staff recommends approval of the adjustment. Residential Zoning Districts - Chapter 18.510: The residential zoning district development standards are discussed previously in this report under the Conditional Use standards. It should be noted that Religious Institutions are permitted conditionally in all residential zones. Access Egress and Circulation - Chapter 18.705: Public Street Access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030(H) and 18.705.030(1) shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the city for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis; The site is surrounded on all four sides by public streets. The site currently has existing access from SW Johnson, SW Grant, and SIN McKenzie streets. This criterion is satisfied. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional and industrial uses, to g e streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 10 OF 27 CUP2002-00006NAR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2/19/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • The proposal involves a two phased expansion of the existing facilities. The applicant has indicated that the site is a campus setting, and the site plan shows the expansion of the existing sidewalk network on site being extended to the new buildings, and to the right-of-way along SW McKenzie. This criterion has been satisfied. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access drivewa s or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; and The walkways have been identified on the site plan and discussed briefly within the narrative. No proposed walkway is less than 5-feet in width, and there are no walkways over 33 feet in length that cross traffic aisles. All proposed walkways across traffic aisles will be clearly marked and walkways that cross the accesses have contrasting pavement (Concrete as opposed to AC Pavement). This criterion is satisfied. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The applicant has indicated to staff that the new sidewalks will be constructed of concrete. This criterion has been addressed. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with less than 99 parking spaces is one 30-foot-wide access with a 24- foot pavement width. There are several accesses onto the site from SW McKenzie, SW Johnson, and SW Grant. All the accesses meet the minimum dimensional requirements of 30 feet in width with 24 feet of pavement. The new access that is proposed along SW McKenzie does meet the minimum requirements. This standard is satisfied. Access Management (Section 18.705.030.1-1): Section 18.703.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. Kittelson and Associates submitted a memo, dated November 12, 2002, indicating that there are existing queues generated from the site during AM and PM peak periods, due to pick-up and drop-off activities. These queues tend to back up onto the adjacent streets: Johnson Street, Grant Avenue and McKenzie Street. Kittelson noted that although these queues exist, they are short in duration and are at predictable times. In addition, the signalized intersection at Walnut Street/99W offers non-school traffic an alternate route. Phase 1A of the St. Anthony project is primarily focused on improvements adjacent to McKenzie Street. One of the features of this phase is the addition of a longer, one-way driveway that can serve as a drop-off location. This will help with any queuing problems on McKenzie. The future Phase 113 will include the addition of a 360-foot long queuing area onsite that will alleviate queues onto Johnson Street and Grant Avenue. ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 11 OF 27 CUP2002-00006NAR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2119/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 0 0 Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence ' area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frrontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. None of the existing driveways are located within the influence area of collector or arterial streets. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. None of the site driveways are along collector or arterial streets. Environmental Performance Standards - Chapter 18.725: Requires thaffederal and-ts ale environmental laws, ruffs and regulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 Performance Standards regulates: Noise, visible emissions, vibration and odors. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.41.130 through 7.40 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Visible Emissions. Within the Commercial zoning districts and the Industrial Park I-P) zoning district, ere shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stac or other point- source emission other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombinea water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in an given zoning district, which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors. The emissions of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily- detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat. No direct or sky reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and; 1) there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2) these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be- stored and all grounds Shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of-insects or rodents or create a health hazard. FINDING: Based on the information provided by the applicant, the expanded use of the property will conform to the above requirements. If for some reason the above standards were in question, and it was subsequently found that the use was out of compliance with any of the above standards, the property owner would be subject to code enforcement, court review, and possible fines until they were brought back into compliance. ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 12 OF 27 CUP2002-00006NAR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2/19/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • 0 Landscaping and Screening - Chapter 18.745: Street trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.C Section 18.745.040.C requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The applicant is seeking approval of the development as phased construction, and has requested an adjustment to the requirement for street trees along SW McKenzie Street. As discussed previously in this report, staff could not support approval of the adjustment because it failed to meet the approval criterion of the TDC, but would support deferral of the requirement until phase 1 B is constructed. Their, justification is to preserve parking spaces that are currently being used by the church until the new parking area is constructed with phase 1 B. The Church has requested that the City also allow the planting of street trees along SW Grant and Johnson Street be delayed until such time that phase 1 B is constructed. These requests seem sensible as long as some form of financial surety is posted to ensure that the improvements are made with phase 1 B. FINDING: The proposal fails to provide street trees as required by TDC Chapter 18.745. The Church has requested that the City allow the street trees to be planted at a future date with future construction. CONDITIONS: Prior to any site work with phase 1A, the applicant shall provide the City of Tigard with financial assurance for the planting of street trees on all frontages of the development. Prior to the issuance of any permits on phase 1 B, the applicant shall provide the City with a landscaping plan to show compliance with TDC Section 18.745.040 Street Trees). The revision shall include street trees along the entire frontages of SW Grant Street, SW McKenzie Street, and SW Johnson Street. Land Use Buffering and Screening: Buffering and Screening is required between different types of land uses. It is the intent of these standards to provide for privacy and protection and reduce or eliminate the adverse impacts of visual or noise pollution that a development site may impose on adjacent properties. The proposed use is in a residential zone and abutting residential uses on three sides. The screening standards of TDC Section 18.745.050(E)(1), and the buffering requirements of Table 18.745.1 do not specifically speak to religious facilities because they are permitted conditionally. There is an inherent difference between the uses, however, the facility is separated from those uses by right-of-way, and the code does not require buffering along right-of-way. The southeast corner of the property is adjacent to existing commercial businesses, and there are no requirements for buffering along these areas. The Church has however, provided a landscaping plan to achieve some separation from the commercial uses. This criterion is satisfied. Screening Special Provisions: Section 8.74.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped Parking areas shall include special design features, which effectively screen the parking of areas from view. Planting materials o be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 13 OF 27 CUP2002-00006NAR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2/19/2003 PUBLIC HEARING. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 0 • The applicant has provided a preliminary landscape plan. There are no new parking areas proposed with phase 1A, and the applicant has asked the City to allow the retention of some parking areas along the west side of the property that are in the SW McKenzie Street right-of-way until such time that they construct phase 1 B. Again, this seems sensible in order to prevent the removal of landscaping during phase 1 B construction, and to allow for the facility to continue to use the parking that encroaches into the right-of-way until the new parking lot is completed. All new parking areas, and the lot that will be revised along SW McKenzie should be brought up to current standards. Therefore, the following conditions are recommended to ensure that the new and revised parking areas brought into compliance with the second phase of construction (Phase 1 B). FINDING: The proposal does not meet the criteria set forth in TDC Section 18.745.050(E)(1)(a.). CONDITIONS: Prior to the issuance of any site permits of phase 113, the applicant shall provide City staff with a revised landscape plan demonstratingg compliance with TDC Section 18.745.050 (E)(1) a). The applicant shall include placement of trees within the interior or any new and revised parking areas throughout the site at a ratio of one tree for every seven parking spaces and located within islands that are three feet wide and protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Prior to the issuance of final occupancy permits for improvements in phase 1A, the applicant shall provide the City with financial assurance for the value of the required landscaping. Mixed Solid Waste and Recvclables Storaae - Chapter 18.755: Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan, which indicates compliance with this section. Re ardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the acility location and compatibility. The applicant has not indicated which of the 4 methods will be used to demonstrate compliance with this chapter, but has shown an enclosure on the site plan, and provided a fax from Pride Disposal approving the new location. FINDING: The proposal does not specifically detail which option of the four options available within TDC Section 18.755.040 will be used. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-se arated recyclable shall be co- located witfi the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users- Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 design standards• The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 14 OF 27 CUP2002-00006NAR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2119/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • The site plan shows a trash enclosure on the West side of the gymnasium within the front yard of the facility. The applicant has very few alternatives since all four sides of the institution have frontage on public rights-of-way. Although the location of the proposed facility is not permitted by code, it is apparent that facility placement is limited. The location of the service facility should be further discussed by the Church and with Pride Disposal to ensure that the facility is convenient and secure. This standard has not been met. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedgge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The applicant has not indicated on the site plan what type of screeninq will be utilized for the refuse container, but has indicated in the narrative that all service facilities will be screened as required. The applicant has not specifically addressed this section and, therefore, has not fully demonstrated compliance. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of complete compliance with the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage standards, the development criteria of this chapter have not been met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met: CONDITION: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide a narrative detailing which one of the four methods will be chosen for solid waste and recyclable storage. A detail of the enclosure along with any other necessary elements shall be submitted (See Section 18.755.040 (C-F). The applicant shall provide the City with a new location for the facility outside of the front yard of the facility. If a new site cannot be found, the applicant shall seek a variance to the location standards of the TDC. Off-Street Parkina and Loadingj18.765t Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. According to the Oregon Uniform Building Code, a parking facility accommodating 201-300 spaces requires 7 ADA accessible spaces. The existing conditions plan only indicates that there are six spaces available. This criterion has not been met. FINDING: The proposal does not provide the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code. CONDITION: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall revise the parking plan to comply with the Oregon Uniform Building Code and show seven (7 ADA accessible spaces as opposed to the six that are identified on the Curren site plan. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 15 OF 27 CUP2002-00006NAR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2/19/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 0 • the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access. drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The applicant has proposed to add an additional access alon SW McKenzie Street during phase 1A. The applicant is also proposing to revise an exis ino access during phase 1B. Both accesses meet the dimensional requirements for access. edestrian safety and visual clearance has been addressed elsewhere in this report. This criterion is satisfied. Loading/unloading driveways: A driveway designed for continuous forward flow of passenger vehicles for the purpose of loading and unloading passengers shall be located on the site of any school or other meeting. place which is designed to accommodate more than 25 people at one time. The applicant has identified a loading and unloading area along SW McKenzie Street for Phase 1A, and is proposing to revise the loading and unloading area along SW Grant Street with Phase 1 B. Both the access report from Kittleson and Associates, and the City Engineer agree that these two improvements will improve the existing conditions on the site. This criterion is satisfied. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The applicant has indicated that the parking lot will be striped and has indicated striping and direction arrows on the plans. This criterion has been met. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant is not proposing any new parkin areas with phase 1A, but has proposed to revise the parking along SW McKenzie, and Grant Streets with phase 1B. Any new parking areas and revised parking spaces should be brought into compliance with the current standards. This criterion is not satisfied. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Table 18.765.1. outlines the minimum dimensions for angled parking. The existing parking spaces are marked, and there are no new parking areas proposed with phase 1A. The applicant has indicated in the narrative that the new parking area will be compliant with the dimensional standards of the TDC. Staff is recommending a condition further in this report to clarify the proposed parking improvements including updating the existing parking areas. This criterion can be satisfied. ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 16 OF 27 CUP2002-00006NAR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2/19/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. The TDC requires 1 parking space for every 20 seats in the main assembly area. The applicant has indicatedthat the sanctuary currently seats 700. As with all religious institutions, Tigard determines the required parking based on the seating within the main sanctuary. At a seating capacity of 700, this facility will require 35 bicycle-parking spaces. The applicant has requested a 49% reduction to provide only 18 spaces. This adjustment has been previously addressed in this report. This criterion is satisfied. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. The TDC requires that the facility provide 233 parking spaces on site for a seating capacity of 700 within the main sanctuary. According to the applicant, there are currently 249 spaces available for parking including the two accessory parking lots located across Sy McKenzie, and SW Grant Street. Phase 1A would propose not to remove or add any new parking. Phase1 B requires the removal of 16 spaces bringing the parking available to 233. The applicant has requested that they be able to retain the eleven spaces that currently encroach into the City right-of way along SW McKenzie until such time as the existing buildings are remodeled or reconstructed. Staff will only support temporary use of these spaces to accommodate construction. Therefore, it is unclear to staff whether or not the facility will be able to meet the parking requirements without these 11 spaces, and the following condition is recommended to ensure compliance. FINDING: Staff cannot be certain that the parking requirements are met at the end of phase 113 construction with the removal of the eleven spaces along SW McKenzie Street. CONDITION: Prior to the issuance of any site permits for phase 1B construction, the applicant shall provide the City with a parking plan that shows compliance with the minimum parking requirements of 233 spaces on site. The plan shall demonstrate compliance with the dimensional and material requirements of TDC Chapter 18.765 for all new and revised parking spaces on site. In the event that phase 113 is not constructed within the approval period of this decision the Church shall abandon the eleven spaces that encroach into the right-of-way along SW McKenzie, and make all necessary improvements to the new and revised parking areas on site to bring them into compliance with the Tigard Development Code. Off-street loading requirements: Off-street loading spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as 1. A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; 2. A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. Off-street loading dimensions: 1. Each loading berth shall be approved by the City Engineer as to design and location; 2. Each loading space shall have sufficient area for turning and maneuvering of vehicles on the site. At a minimum, the maneuvering length shall not be less than twice the overall length of the longest vehicle using the facility site; 3. Entrances and exits for the loading areas shall be provided at locations approved by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 18.710; ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 17 OF 27 CUP2002-00006NAR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2/19/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • ~r 4. Screening for off-street loading facilities is required and shall be the same as screening for parking lots in accordance with Chapter 18.745. Because of the size of the site, the church would be required to provide two (2) off-street loading spaces to meet the standard. The applicant has indicated two loading spaces on the plan that meet the minimum requirements. This criterion is satisfied. Tree Removal - Chanter 18.790 Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist be provided for a conditional use application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, identification of which trees are proposed to be removed, and a protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has provided a tree survey and plan from a certified arborist that generally describes the trees that are on the project site and their condition. According to the report, there are a total of thirt y-nine trees on site over six inches in diameter. Twenty-eight trees are over 12 inches in diameter. According to the report, six of the trees that are over 12 inches in diameter will have to be removed to accommodate construction. According to TDC Section 18.790.030(B)(2)(d), the applicant will have no mitigation requirements. FINDING: The applicant has proposed to retain 79% percent of trees over twelve inches on site and is not subject to any required tree mitigation in accordance with TDC Section 18.790.030. In order to insure the viability of the existing trees and those trees within the area of work, the following conditions shall apply. CONDITIONS: The applicant shall comply with the protection measures prescribed* by the City Arborist. The applicant shall provide the City Arborist with a construction sequence including installation and removal of tree protection devices, clearing, grading, and paving. The applicant shall notify the City Arborist when tree protection measures are in place so that he may verify that the measures will function properly prior to construction. Visual Clearance Areas - Chanter 18.795: Section 18.795.020.A. states that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Section 18.795.030.6. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstrILiction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided ali branches below eight feet are removed. There are no proposed structures inside of the vision clearance area, and the applicant has stated in the narrative, that no obstructions will be placed in the visual clearance areas. This standard is satisfied. C. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL CRITE=RIA Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 18 OF 27 CUP2002-00006NAR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2/19/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain) and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.13 Parking); 18.360.090.12 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.13 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 ( rovision for the Disabled); 18.360.090 15 (Provisions of the underlying zone). Compliance with all of the applicable reauirements of this title including Chanter 18.810. Street and Utilitv Standards: As discussed in this report, all applicable sections have been addressed and where the proposal is deficient, staff has recommended conditions to ensure compliance. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions;; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The applicant has proposed tree removal that has been addressed elsewhere in this report, and the site has already been developed to the point that there are no extraordinary physical or natural restraints that would dictate the placement of the new building and the proposed addition. No buildings or structures are proposed that will hinder air circulation, or prevent fire-fighting apparatus from performing their fobs. This criterion has beE~n met. Buffering, screening, and compatibility between adjoining uses: Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses and decreased noise levels, air pollution, visual barrier, on site screening of service areas, storage areas, F lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be considered in determining the intensity of the buffer or screen. As discussed previously in this report the site is separated from residential uses by right-of-way along SW Grant, SW McKenzie, and SW Johnson Streets. There are no requirements to provide any buffers or screening aside from the required landscaping and screening that have been discussed previously in this report. This criterion is satisfied. Crime Prevention and Safety: Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and . Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 19 OF 27 CUP2002-00006NAR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2119/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT 1-0 THE HEARINGS OFFICER • 1, The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this project and has not indicated concern or objection with the proposal. To ensure that the plan addresses crime prevention concerns, the applicant has provided information within the narrative to indicate that they will add two new lights to the loading area by the gymnasium and has proposed to provide wall mounted exterior lighting on all four sides of the new gymnasium. The applicant has indicated that they will be providing the same type of lighting with phase 113 construction. The applicant did not specifically detail the lighting for phase 113. The primary concerns related to lighting are to provide security, and to protect adjacent neighbors from nuisance lighting. The crime prevention standards have not been fully met. FINDING: The proposal fails to address lighting as required by the TDC Section 18.360.090(10) for phase 1 B. CONDITION: Prior to issuing building permits for either phase, the applicant shall submit a detailed lighting plan that shows no projection off site and complies with crime prevention requirements of the TDC Section 18.360.090(10). Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The applicant is seeking an adjustment to the parking standards, and is actively working with Tri-Met to ensure that their needs are fully met. This criterion is satisfied. C. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS - CHAPTER 18.810 Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and draiinage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as aportion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a nei hborhood route street to have a 54-foot right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Johnson Street, Grant Avenue and McKenzie Street. Johnson Street and Grant Avenue are both classified as neighborhood routes on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately ;30 feet of ROW along the majority of Johnson Street and 30 feet along the entire length of y rant Avenue, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The existing ROW widths are adequate given the location of the existing school building near the intersection of Johnson Street/99W. Additional ROW is needed at the intersections of Grant Avenue/Johnson Street (30-foot radius) and at Grant Avenue/McKenzie Street (25-foot radius). These dedications should be completed prior to issuance of the site permit. Grant Avenue is fully improved and there are no improvements needed to support Phase 1A. When Phase 113 is developed, street trees can be added as necessary to meet City standards. ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 20 OF 27 CUP2002-00006N)kR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2/19/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • 1, Johnson Street is partially improved at this time, but not fully improved to City standards. The realignment of the proposed parking area in front of the proposed community center will require the access along SW Johnson to be revised. While alleviating some of the queuing problems that presently occur, the revision will require that the access be brought to current city standards. According to TDC18.810.030(A)(3), "no development shall occur unless streets adjacent to the development meet the standards of this chapter, provided, however, that a development may be approved if the adjacent street does riot meet the standards, but half-street improvements meeting the standards of this title are constructed adjacent to the development.' In this particular instance, the City has made the necessary paved improvements to the street, but has not made the curb, sidewalk, and street tree improvements along 320 feet of SW Johnson. As a part of Phase 1 B, these improvements must be completed to meet City standards. McKenzie Street is classified as a local residential street and operates as a one-way roadway. The primary traffic on this roadway is for school traffic. Vehicles travel in a westerly direction from 99W. The roadway is fully improved except for street trees. The applicant has requested an adjustment to the street tree requirement to allow planting of street trees along the south side of McKenzie Street and along the east side of Grant Avenue adjacent to the existing parking lot at that location. The reason for the adjustment is to preserve some existing onsite parking spaces on the church site until such time that more parking spaces are added in the future phase. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. There is existing sidewalks along both Grant Avenue and McKenzie Street. Sidewalk will be added to Johnson Street as a part of Phase 1 B. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.C states that proposed sewer .systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sewer line in Johnson Street that has ample capacity to serve this development. The applicant's plan shows that the sewer Rom the addition will be routed via a new onsite line that will connect to the public line in Johnson Street. A public facility improvement (PFI) is needed for the work in the ROW of Johnsen Street. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states regwires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.C states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based 0n the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no existing upstream drainage areas that affect this site. ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 21 OF 27 CUP2002-00006NAR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2/19/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • 0 Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Diirector and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. All stormwater from the new phase will be conveyed through an onsite detention facility and a water quality facility and will discharge into the existing public storm system in Johnson Street. Preliminary sizing calculations for the onsite detention system were submitted. The current design includes oversize pipe, but the engineer notes that they may opt to enlarge the water quality Swale area to facilitate a combination detention/water quality facility. Either option is acceptable. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. None of the abutting streets are designated as bicycle facilities. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the under round services; The City reserves1he right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets- and Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.C states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing uflities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval auhority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in con unction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- y-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in- lieu of under-grounding. ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 22 OF 27 CUP2002-00006A AR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2/19/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPOR-i TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • 0 There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Johnson Street, Grant Avenue and McKenzie Street. The overhead lines along McKenzie Street directly serve this phase: The applicant asked for an adjustment to allow payment of a fee in-lieu. However, an adjustment is not necessary, as the decision for undergrounding or payment of the fee has been made. The City will allow payment of the fee based on the fact that McKenzie Street is improved now and it would be impractical to require the applicant to place the overhead lines underground. The fee in-lieu of undergrounding is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage of McKenzie Street along this site is 470 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $12,925.00. It should be noted that when Phase 1 B, and any other future phases, are constructed, additional requirements under this section may be imposed if service to those phases come from the overhead lines from Grant Avenue or Johnson Street. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Studv Findings: The Kittelson report, mentioned previously, stated that this addition will result in an approximate addition of 50 new students. With the existing carpool ratio for the school, this will equate to approximately 35 additional vehicles during the AM and PM pick-up/drop-off periods. As was stated previously, the onsite queuing area flagged for Phase 113 will alleviate any backups onto Johnson Street and Grant Avenue. The proposed entry adjacent to McKenzie Street will help alleviate queues at that location. Public Water Svstem: This site is served by existing lines within the City of Tigard water service area. The new phase will be served from the existing 6-inch main line in McKenzie Street. The final design of the tap and backflow configuration must be reviewed and approved by the Engineering and Public Works departments. This will be reviewed as a part of the! PFI permit process. Storm Water Qualitv: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plans show a biofiltration swale will be located near the northwest corner of the site. This swale will be designed and constructed to accommodate the flows from this phase and all future phases. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall providthe City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that he water quality facility is it compliance with the design and specifications. ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 23 OF 27 CUP2002-00006/V,4R2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2/19/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • 0 Gradina and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from developcent, construction, rading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per TWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. A final grading and erosion control plan will be reviewed by the Building Division as a part of the site permit process. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assi ning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing feEl in the amount of $ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For this project, a separate address must be assigned to the gymnasium in Phase 1A. Therefore, the addressing fee will be $30.00. For the future Phase 1 B, a separate address must be assigned to the community center. An additional $30 charge will be assessed for that building. E. IMPACT STUDY: Section 18.390.040.B.2.e states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. The applicant has submitted an impact study addressing the required elements above. ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development. Presently, the.TIF for the entire project including phase 1B is estimated at $20,974. ($0 for the gymnasium, $15,875 for the Community Center, and $5,099 for the school expansion) These numbers increase by 6% annually. According to the Washington County TIF ordinance, 32 percent of a projects impacts are met by its TIF assessment in Tigard. This leaves 68% unmitigated. ThE, actual cost of system improvements per trip generated by new development on the transportation system can be determined by the following equation (Larson, Mackenzie Engineering, Dolan Findings, June 1995): $20,974 divided by.32 equals $65,543.75. Jul 92002)heTIF assessment according to the Washington County l-IF ordinance effective Less mitiaated costs The applicant is required to dedicate additional right-of-way at the Pntersections of Grant Avenue/Johnson Street (160 square feet) and at Grant Avenue/McKenzie Street (235 square feet) to bring the right-of-way radii to an approved standard. The estimated value of the dedication is three dollars a square foot for a total value of $1,185. The applicant is also required to complete the installation of curb, sidewalk, and street tree, improvements along SW Johnson Street along with phase 1 B. The City has already made the necessary paved improvements. At an approximate cost of $100 per lineal foot the improvements are valued at $32,000. ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 24 OF 27 CUP2002-00006N,4R2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2/19/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • Estimate of Unmitiaated Impacts Full Impact $65,543.75 Less TIF Assessment $ 20,974 Less Mitiaated Costs 33.185 Estimate of Unmitigated Impacts 11 384.75 FINDING: Using the above cost factors, it can be determined that the unmitigated impacts exceed the costs of the conditions imposed and, therefore, the conditions are roughly proportional and justified. SECTION VIII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and expressed no concerns or objections. The applicant should coordinate with the Building Division prior to construction. The City of Tigard Engineering Department was sent this proposal for review and the comments have been incorporated into this report. The City of Tigard Arborist was sent this proposal and offered the following comments and recommendations: All trees on the neighboring properties must receive the same protection guidelines as the trees on the applicant's site. If the tree protection guidelines outlined in the conditions of approval are not followed, moved after being approved in the field, knocked down during construction or are removed prior to the end of construction the project will be: r4 Immediately shut down until the fencing is reinstalled according to the conditions of approval. 4 Corrective action will taken by the applicant to address the damage done to the Critical Root Zones of each tree. Corrective action may include, but not limited to, loosening compacted soil, replacing graded soil or removing filled soil. r4 A fine of$250.00 per day shall be assessed to the applicant for each day that the fencing is down. The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager has reviewed this application and has indicated that all utility work should be coordinated with the City. City of Tigard Property Manager has reviewed this application and offered no comments or objections. City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and offered no comments or objections. SECTION IX. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services has reviewed the proposal and expressed no concerns or objections. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed this application and has provided the following comments: FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDING AND TURNAROUNDS: Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. An approved turnaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet. (UFC Sec. 902.2.1) ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 25 OF 27 CUP2002-00006NAR2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2/19/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • 1, 2) ACCESS ROADS ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS: Access roadways shall not be closer than 20 feet to a structure unless topographical restrictions dictate the location. (UFC Sec. 902.2.1) 3) FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD EXCEPTION FOR AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER PROTECTION: When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, the requirements for fire apparatus access may be modified as approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 902.2.1 Exception 1) 4) PAINTED CURBS: Where required, fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high. Lettering shall be white on red or black on yellow background. (UFC Sec. 1.301.4.5.2) s) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi, whichever is less. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's Office. (UFC Sec. 903.3) 6) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - FIRE HYDRANTS: No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet From a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the building and along an approved fire apparatus access roadway. Any hydrants that are left over from the minimum number of hydrant calculations may be full filled by hydrants that are up to 500 feet from any point of the building. The fire Prevention Ordinance has further requirements that need to be used for acceptance and placement of fire hydrants. UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1) 7) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - MINIMUM NUMBER OF FIRE HYDRANTS: The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire flow prior to giving credit for fire protection systems divided by 1500. If the answer is equal o or greater than x.5 the next whole number of hydrants shall be used. There shall not be less than 2 hydrants per building. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1) Considerations for Dlacina fire hvdrants shall be as follows: Existing hydrants in the area may be used to meet the required number of hydrants; however, hydrants that are over 500 feet away from the nearest point of the subject building shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by railroad tracks shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided highway, freeway, or heavily traveled collector streets shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the required number of hydrants only if approved by the Chief. Private hydrants or public hydrants that are on adjacent private property shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants for the subject building. Exception: The use of hydrants located on other private property may be considered if their locations and access are encumbered in a legal document such as deed restriction) by the owners of the involved parcels of property. he encumbrance may be lifted only after approvals by the Chief on behalf of the fire department and any other governmental agencies that may require approval. When evaluating the placement of hydrants at apartment or industrial complexes the first hydrant(s) to be placed shall be at the primary access and any secondary access to the site. After these hydrants have been placed other hydrants shall be sited to meet the above requirements for spacing and minimum number of hydrants. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1.1) s) FIRE HYDRANT DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS ROAD: Fire hydrants shall be located not more-than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.4 9) REFLECTIVE HYDRANT MARKERS: Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access road way that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (UFC Sec. 901.4.3) ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 26 OF 27 CUP2002-00006N)%R2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2/19/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • 0 10) ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fcihting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC Sec. 8704) 11) KNOX BOX: A Knox Box for building access is required for this building. Please contact the Fire Marshal's Office for an order form and instructions regarding installation and placement. (UFC Sec. 902.4) http://www.tvfr.com/Departments/FireMarshal/newconstruction.htm Verizon, Tri-Met and ODOT were given the opportunity to review this proposal and submitted no comments or objections. A /-J,~ Februarv 12. 2003 PREPARED BY`. Brad Kilby J DATE Associate Planner C_. ~ Fe!bruarv 12. 2003 APPROVED BY: f ichard Bewersg6T DATE Planning Manager ST. ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH EXPANSION PAGE 27 OF 27 CUP2002-00006NA.R2002-00043NAR2002-00044 2119/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF.REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER CC GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION BYBTEM VICINITY MAP CUP2002-00006 VAR2002-00043 VAR2002_nn044 ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH EXPANSION N 0 200 400 6DO Feet 1'= 404 feet City of Tigard :ommunity Development / Information on this map is for general location only and Y should be verified with the Development Services Division. / 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard. OR 97223 \ (503) 6394171 httpJAv .ci.tigard.or.us Plot date: Jan 14, 2003; CAmagic\MAGIC03.APR fi /i ST r~ 0 w ® (JU OF TIGARD t CUP2002-00006NAR2002.00043NAR2002-00044 CR7 OF nomm Sri PLAN N ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH EXPANSION (Map is not to scale) r 11/15/2002 17:16 FAX 503684729 City of Tigard ~ ` X002 * P ~PREA~ ~HELD Ert 4TY F I AR ' P l ' =D Vf tC C3 Lr , 93125'SW;kiALL,60 lWA,RD'T1 AF#bMR 9,7223-8't89;., . 'U I G ~0343~9~4MY50'ft$~~.7c~3~: CITY OF T1GARb _ . " ' y OREGON .e,::w.F.;a,_ ~ ~ LA P ~US•E ,P RMIT•APPl1CA1`ID:N 13 /eive File # Otiiec:(2ase.# (Z~~lIY~~ aDd~ ~ Date By -1 11. Receipt,# .1 DateApplication Complete I I TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR (Q AdjustmenWariance (I or II) ❑ Minor Land Partition (11) ❑ Zone Change (III) I ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment (IV) ❑ Planned Development (111) ❑ Zone Change Annexation (IV) ❑'donditional Use (111) ❑ Sensitive Lands Review (1, Il or III) ❑ Zone Ordinance Amendment (IV) ❑ Historic Overlay (it or III) ❑ Site Development Review (II) ❑ Home Occupation (11) ❑ Subdivision (11 or 111) LUUAI IUN VVMI=Kt i'KW'UbtU AU I IVI I Y VVILL UL;UUK tAooress it avaliaoie) I Ax MAr 6, I Ax LU I NUZ). - ! L71 AL JI I t JItC LU,VINb I.WJJIrIWat lulu AN N LI C:AN I" R MAILING AUUKcSSK;I I Y/s I AI t/Z)p' j 1'r1UNt NU. rAA NU. r ~ 11KIMAKr UUNIA(:I VrKSUN HhUNtNU. I 1'KUt'LKI Y UWNtK/UttU HULULK (Attach list it more than one) t I J ^✓i~l 1%' l~Y l l ✓ G I MAILINGAUUKtbb/L;II Y/WAItJLIN rr1UNt NU. MA A NU.- c 60~) 4 J -7 9 (6`11?) J~,7 7 e~- 2 ~ 'When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. rKUr'WAL bUMMAKY mease be specific) ✓p . ~ l s::i. l ' i/.!' f ~ S c yr ~ ' O 5 5 0 ~ , ' ~,~h~ 5 r {~,.~r idr~- ' v~ I G'J4 S1il/ U ✓1/(/~,C~(~ ?wit ~1 ~1 , ~ I t APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET, `11/15/2002 17:17 FAX 5036847297 City of Tigard 0001/001 THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: ♦ If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. ♦ All the:above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. Owner's Signature Date ` Owner's Signature ' Date Owner's Signature ` Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date ApplicantfAgent/Representative's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date .11/15/2002 17:16 FAX 5036847297 City of Tigard 4003 CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATIONS BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, This checklist identifies the basic submittal requirements for a land use application. BASIC INFORMATION: ❑ Completed Master "Land Use Permit" Application with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization ❑ Title transfer instrument or grant deed ❑ Written summary of proposal ❑ Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) ❑ Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed #10 envelopes for all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing. envelopes shall be standard legal-size (#10), addressed with 1" x 4" labels, (see envelope submittal requirements). Property owner mailing lists must be prepared by the City for a minimal fee (see request for 500' property owner mailing list form). ❑ Documentary evidence of Neighborhood Meeting for the following, Site Development Review, Subdivision, Conditional Use, Sensitive Lands Review, Zone Change, Comprehensive Plan Amendments. ❑ Neighborhood Meeting Affidavits of Posting & Mailing Notice, Minutes, Sign-in Sheets 0 Service Provider Letter ❑ Impact Study per Section 16.390.040.B.2.(e) ❑ Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes ❑ Filing Fee (see fee schedule) PLANS REQUIRED: In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or. plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION -(See separate attachment for details on what information to include on each plan): ❑ Vicinity Map ❑ Preliminary GradinglErosion Control Plan ❑ Existing Conditions Map ❑ Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan ❑ Site Development Plan ❑ Architectural Drawings (elevations & floor plans) • Landscape Plan D Sign Drawings ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR PURPOSES OF REVIEWING YOUR APPLICATION FOR COMPLETENESS, Ot LY 3 COPIES ARE NEEDED. THE BALANCE OF THE COPIES WILL BE REQUESTED FROM YOU, ONCE DEEMED COMPLETE, TO MAKE YOUR APPLICATION SUBMITTAL COMPLETE. h:lpa"asterslapplicadon submittal requirements.doc UPDATED: 26-Ju"2 .11/15/2002 17:15 FAX 5036847297 City of Tigard SETTING THE STANDARD FOR SER VICE EXCELLENCE Facs xmile To: Company: Phone: - Fax: S o3 - -ac' S ' d From: Company: City of Tigard Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684- 7297 Date: / J 1 S ! G~ Pages including this page: COMNffi ls: a City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 PLEASE DELIVEkTHIS FAX DAMEDIATELY rr St. Anthonq Cotholic Church 9905 S.W_ McKenzie Street Tigard, Oregon 97223-5195 October 15, 2002 Comments made at Neighborhood meeting October 10, 2002 St. Anthony Church - 9905 SW McKenzie Street One resident attended the neighborhood meeting - Dr. Terry Hohner (5830 McKenzie Street). Two representatives of the applicant attended: Rev. Leslie Sieg, Pastor and John Dillin, parish Development Director Dr. Hohner had three primary concerns. 1. Would McKenzie street remain one-way? The applicant explained that this development plan included no change in McKenzie street direction. 2. Would on-street parking be reduced? The applicant explained that there might be additional on strf;et parking created by the possible removal one driveway. It was explained that it was the applicant's desire that no on-street parking would be eliminated by this development unless it was required to satisfy contemporary code requirements. 3. Landscaping was a concern of the neighbor It was explained that the city codes required a professional landscaping plan and that city code requirements detailed the kind of plant and tree material that would be appropriate. It was also explained that the applicant intended to add trees to the green space along the applicant's parking lot at the South side of McKenzie Street as part of this development. Other minor informational questions were discussed such as ingress and egress to the new facility, run-off water plans, seating capacity of the gymnasium and fencing. At the conclusion of the discussion, the neighbor expressed no reservations about the proposed development or specific recommendations concerning the plans. f 4 Telephone (503) 639-4179 F-Mail. LSieg@stanthongtigord.org Fax (503) 624-2364 4~t 1 Neig--'I--)orhood Meeting October '0, 2002 St. Anthony Glurch NAME 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. ADDRESS ✓C/~~ C'~('tc.~EZl~~c C`~~~~,L /~(H3u S ci1• t~~~:-cn:z~,E . • ~ St. Anthony Catholic Church Or 9905 S.W_ McKenzie Street Tigard, Oregon 97223-5195 September 23, 2002 RE: St. Anthony Church Development Dear Interested Party, I am the pastor of St. Anthony Catholic Church which located at 9905 SW McKenzie Street (tax lot 2S 102131), 100). Our church is considering proposing a change in our conditional use permit at this location that would involve the construction of a new facility. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday; October 10, 2002 The Kelly Center at St. Anthony Church 9905 SW McKenzie Street Tigard, Oregon 7:00 PM Please notice this will be an information meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing this proposal with you. Please call me at (503) 639- 4179 at the church office if you have any questions. Sincerely, i' f Rev. Leslie M. Sieg Pastor Telephone (503) 639-4179 E-Mail. LSieg@stonthonytigord.org Fox (503) 624-2364 AFFIDAVIT OF MAIAG/POSTING NEIGHBORHM D MEETING NOTICE IMP..ORTANTNOTICE §T~H`ALICANT,IS.REQUIRED TO~MAIL.THE LIT~Y O;F~TIGARD AC~PY%4I:'T~IE; NEIHBORHOO~DINEETING NOTICE °THAT PERAINwSrTO;THIS AFFIDAVIT AT THE~SAMETIME PROPERTY GWNER$i3ARE1ILED NOTICE, TO `THE ADDRESS BELOW Y g ng 0 Cat of Ti artl - Plang ~`ule rv~s fon~13125 SW H vard allo Tigard, OR 97223, 8'189' IN ADDITION, THE'APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAVIT &uCOPLE$ OF ALL NOTICES AT;THE TIME OF,APPLICATION MAILING: I, L tk C i ( Ie ISQ1"S Ch being duly sworn, depose and say that on the -2041 day of ~L 20 D,;~, I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) 'S-t. 4a4konq ilt l rck a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto an made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at rct 0 re G,Or1 with postage prepaid thereon. J L,Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) POSTING: I, L~ l,l I U 1~J C l',1 do affirm that I am (represent) thE: party initiating interest in a proposed affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) G / 0 S I,c) M C K r'1.~ 1 St. and did on the 3 rd day of S. n 20 0 a personally/ post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the' proposal. The sign was posted st J) S i d es -fill G Q >ra G e c-i 0 G a J (state location you posted notice on property) J4" nature (lri the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF County of W tJS N jr' , 6A, ) ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of 2000 . OFFICIAL SEAL FRANCES L. AVERY NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON I COMMISSION NO. 352225 cuMMlssloN ExPIRES NOVEMBER 19, 2005 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREG My Commission Expires: Applicant, please complete the information below: NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Ne- l k) Ct Li en rl S i LL Iry'\ TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Address or General Location of Subject Property: 9 9 05 S L0 /11 c 1S t° ti z f e- JT% T~ 4 4 cl Subject Property Tax Map(s) and Lot #(s): h:Vogin\patty\masters\affidavit of maaing-posting neighborhood meeting.doc 41 ANKKOM Re: 1. 2. 3. • 11 MOISAN ASSOCIATED December 31, 2002 Attn: Brad Kilby, Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97233 St. Anthony's School and Church Phased Expansion, Phase 1 - ARCHITECTS Application for Major Modification of existing conditional use. Adjustments to Street Trees, Bicycle Parking, & Underground Utilities. Attachments. Dear Brad: The attached material is in application for a major modification of approved or existing conditional use of Phase I of St. Anthony's School and Church F haled Expansion. Phase 1A, to be constructed in 2003, will include a remodel of the existing middle school and small addition; a new gymnasium building; and associated rite work, including partial mitigation of tree removal outside the area of work within the past year. Phase 1B, to be constructed within a few years, will include: anew community center and site development as necessary to accommodate the community center, improve existing on-site vehicle and pedestrian circulation, and further (mitigation of tree removal outside the area of work within the past year. We understand that as a condition of approval by the City of Tigard, we will be required to submit detailed information for administrative review prior to permitting Phase 1B. Proposed changes that may constitute a major modification are:: • A change in the type and/or location of access ways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. Note that the attached traffic impact technical memorandum concludes that the proposed project will not significantly affect traffic in the vicinity. Therefore, this would not appear to be a major modification. • An increase in the floor area proposed for non-residential use by more than 10% where previously specified. This includes the new gymnasium in Phase IA and community center in Phase 1B. • An elimination of project amenities by more than 10% where previously specified, such as landscaping provisions. This includes reduction in landscaped area for new building construction, also recent removal of trees on site not in the area of work within the past year. 67zo s.w. Macadam, Suite too, Portland, Oregon 97219, 500457100, FAX 503/245-7710 Principals: Stewart Ankrom, Thomas Moisan, David Vonada. Lorraine Kellow, Jeff Hamilton, Kann Bowery, Chris Dalengas, Jeff Los, Phil Marquis ~ • 0 DESIGN REVIEW NARRATIVE. Street and Utility Standards. We are required to complete half-street improvements of SW McKenzie St. in Phase IA. Curbs and sidewalks are already in place. The balance of improvements includes street trees and burying overhead utilities. See Adjustments. We are required to complete half-street improvements in SW Grant and to the extent possible on SW Johnson. The area of work on SW Johnson must be limited because a previous dedication left the existing elementary school protruding into the right-of-way. Curbs and sidewalks are already in place on SW Grant, so street trees are required. Sidewalks and street trees are required in the area of work on SW Johnson. We do not proposed to make new power connections on SW Grant and SW Johnson,. so we are not required to bury overhead utilities. Relationship to natural and phvsical environment. Proposes( Phase I construction would'. minimize earthwork including tree removal for economical as well as environmental reasons. The new gymnasium and community center would be as close to existing grade as possible and still comply with ADA requirements at the existing internal sidewalk system. The geotechnical report indicated no tendency for ground slumping or sliding on site. The proposed new buildings in Phases lA and 1B would be located in relationship to existing buildings to comply with the fire marshal's instructions during the master planing design phase for separation for fire fighting and a possible future fire lane. The low roof portion of the gym building would located across from the middle school in order to provide as much light and air between them as possible. The community building will be similarly considered. On the advice of a PGE Earth Advantage engineer, the gym and community center were planned with glazed window walls facing north for improved energy conservation. Few trees will be removed as a result of Phase 1 construction. For additional information, in particular about mitigation of trees removed from the project site outside the area of work within the past year, see Tree Removal Requirements and Mitigation. Neighborhood meeting. The neighborhood meeting was held on October 10, 2002, ai: St. Anthony's School and Church. See attached: Affidavit of Mailing/Posting Neighborhood Meeting Notice; letter from Fr. Leslie Sieg, pastor, to neighbors within 500 ft.; attendance sheet; and meeting notes. 2 ✓ di Fr. Les' comment in the meeting notes that no street parking would be removed was not correct. To comply with loading requirements and facilitate the one-way flow of traffic on-site in the direction of SW McKenzie, it is necessary to remove (2) street parking spaces for a vehicle entry. We propose to use the existing driveway apron for exiting. Note that the proposed street tree adjustment that would preserve parking in the right-of- way and therefore minimize the demand for street parking. Impact study. Kittleson & Associates Transportation Planning/Traffic Engineers observed that the proposed development plan is generally intended to improve facilities for existing activities, rather than increase attendance or event capacity. The effect upon traffic would therefore be negligible except that upon completion it would lessen the effect of queuing in peak periods. See Traffic Evaluatuion from Kittelson & Associates, attached. By extension this is true for other public facilities and services, including bicycle traffic, the parks system, and the sanitary sewer system. No noise impact is anticipated due W the educational and religious nature of the existing facility and new development, the 'small. number of added students, and the proposed location and orientation of the new buildings. The proposed site development would include detention, under ground and in a swale, to meter storm water into the sewer. The soil is not adequately pervious for a swale to reduce the amount of storm water into the sewer. The City of Tigard requires dedication of property to the right-Df-way conforming to the shape of the intersections at SW McKenzie and SW Grant, and SW Grant and SW Johnson, which is to say the corners would be rounded off. The applicant concurs. Access. The project site is required to have a minimum of two 30 ft. accesses. In fact it has seven existing access points. The proposed development would add an eighth 30 ft. wide access in Phase IA. Phase 1B development is planned to utilize two existing access points. ~ • Walkway requirements. The existing middle school and neighboring sanctuary and offices are connected by walkways from all entries and to the public sidewalk system in the right-of-way. The proposed new development would not change the existing walkway system except to connect to it with similar new walkways at the new gymnasium and community center. Buffering & Screening. The property south of the area of work is multi-family. The gym will occupy space presently used for outdoor play, and there will be no entries to the gym in that direction, so the level of noise should be reduced. There will be a sidewalk and bicycle parking in the vicinity, and a one-way vehicle entry for passenger loading will be 60 ft. north. The primary purpose of buffering will be for a visual barrier. Therefore, the existing fence will be replaced with a new 6 ft. sight obscuring fence. A mix of conifers and deciduous trees will be densely planted as for mitigation. A mechanical screen on the low-roof portion of the gym will hide the condenser unit from view on all sides. A transformer will be hidden from view on three sides by shrubbery, visible only to the "loading only" parking space. 100-year flood plain. According to the FEMA Flood Insurance Map, the project site is outside the 100-year flood plain. htty://man l .msc.fema.gov/idms/IntraView.cp-i?KEY=97780238&IFIT'=l Demarcation of public, semi-public, and private spaces for crime prevention. The new and existing buildings to remain will be clustered as ' )art of a larger master plan to define a coherent campus. The educational buildings including the gym will be oriented inward, the religious buildings outward. This formal relationship is intended to establish a friendly relationship with the surrounding community and at the same time contain the school children within a secure, private educational environment. This intent of the scheme will be emphasized by the 5-8 ft. grade change from SW McKenzie to internal pedestrian circulation in front of the gym, and much smaller change in grade from the community center to SW Grant and SW Johnson. 4 Crime prevention and safety. The middle school has existing and functional exterior wall-mounted lighting. The gym will have wall wall-mounted exterior lighting on all four sides. The vehicle drive and passenger load zone will be lit by two new 25 ft. pole lights. The community center will similarly be lit by a combination of wall-mounted and pole lights.. The nature of a gymnasium per se is such that windows aren't law enough to see ground level. However, windows at the accessory spaces, in particular the lobby, were oriented so that they face the part of the middle school not containing windows, and accessory uses such as toilet and locker rooms not having windows are across from the part of the middle school that does. Landscaping. The new landscaping will be sympathetic and continue the design vocabulary of the existing campus. We propose to add four street trees on SW McKenzie St. in the Phase 1A area of work, also to appeal planting street trees north of the Phase IA area of work on SW McKenzie, and in lieu to plant street trees at the parking lot on the opposite side of SW McKenzie and SW Grant. See Adjustments. In Phase 1B we propose to complete half street improvements including street trees on SW Johnson St. and SW Grant St. Also see Buffering & Screening, Tree Removal Requirements, and Mitigation. Recycling. The existing location for trash and recycling apparently predates making SW McKenzie one-way, so Pride Disposal has to drive the wrong way down SW McKenzie St. The proposed Phase 1A design remedies this problem. See the attached fax from Pride Disposal stating they found the proposed design acceptable. Public transit. The area of work does not extend to SW Pacific Hwy. and public transit. We will address this in a future phase of construction. 5 • Parking. The largest parking requirement for St. Anthony's in all phases of planned development is the sanctuary. At a rate of one space per three seats, not taking into account a parking plan, the existing 700 seat sanctuary requires 233 spaces. There are presently 249 spaces. Phase IA would not remove any existing parking and would add one loading space. Therefore, no additional parking is required by Code. Except for loading, no parking associated with the Phase IA middle school and gym is needed by St. Anthony's. Therefore, no changes to parking are proposed in Phase IA. See A1.01 Campus & Zoning Compliance Plan for Phase IA, attached. Phase 113 would remove 42 existing spaces. Therefore, we propose to add at least 26 spaces in Phase 113 for a total of at least 233 spaces, including ADA compliant parking as necessary at the entry to the new Community Center. See A1.01 Campus & Zoning Compliance Plan for Phase 1B, attached. We propose to retain the existing 11 parking spaces that cross the property line into the right-of-way in SW McKenzie St. These spaces are outside the area of work except that we are required to complete half-street improvements, specifically to add street trees, on SW McKenzie St.. We prefer not to remove parking or add street trees at this portion of SW McKenzie St. in Phase 1 because we will be required to add parking elsewhere on campus in a future phase when the sanctuary is enlarged, and;sitreet trees at that location may have to be demolished at that time to respond to requirements in the right-of-way for the enlarged sanctuary. We propose instead to postpone completing half-street improvements at this location until the adjacent buildings are remodeled or demolished and replaced in a future phase, and meanwhile to plant street trees at the parking of on SW Grant and SW McKenzie. Please see the section titled Adjustments. Note that a new St. Vincent de Paul building was removed from Phase 1 construction. Loading area requirements. The only foreseeable loading requirement in Phase lA is for maintenance or repair. Therefore, we provided one loading space at the gym, removed from SW McKenzie so that it would not be necessary for a van to back onto the street. At this time our expectations for Phase 113 are similar. Bicycle racks. New bicycle parking would be located by the new gymnasium. We propose a 50% reduction in bicycle parking requirements. Because St. Anthony's is a private school, it does not primarily serve the neighborhood. Almost all students are driven to school. The few existing bicycle parking spaces are seldom used. New development will not affect this condition. See A1.03 Architectural Site Plan, attached. Cleanwater Services (CWS) Buffer Standards. Cleanwater Services determined that sensitive areas do not exist on-site or within 200' from the project. See letter dated 10/7/02, from Heidi K. Berg, Environmental Plan review, to Kim Shera, Westlake Consultants. Signs. No signs are anticipated at this time except ODOT compliant directional signs (e.g. "ONE WAY - DO NOT ENTER"). We understand that exterior signage is permitted separately. If exterior signage is added to the project, we will contact the planner at the City of Tigard for review prior to permitting. Tree removal requirements... The arborist inventoried all trees on site and provided a survey as reflected by the landscape plan. The Tree Protection Plan was incorporated verbatim into the specifications. Mitigation. Including large fir trees that were removed last Summer, it is necessary to replace 207" (caliper inches). The landscape architect proposes to replace 103" in Phase IA. The balance will be replaced in Phase 113, we will pay a fee in lieu of planting the full extent, or we will reach some other agreement with the City of Tigard during the Conditional Use process. Clear vision area. The clear vision area proposed would maintain the City's requirements at the new and existing road/driveway connection in the area of work. Drainage. A Phase 1 Drainage Summary was prepared by Westlake Consultants, located in Tigard and familiar with local conditions and requirements. 7 • 4, Provisions For the Disabled. The existing middle school will be brought up to current code requirements for accessibility, including significant work to toilet rooms and door clearances.The gym will be full accessible. Site development will include accessible sidewalk connection from SW McKenzie to the existing internal sidewalk system, including an exterior ramp. 8 • ADJUSTMENTS. We request three adjustments: 1. We are required by Code to plant street trees for the length of* the project site on SW McKenzie. We propose to plant street trees at the area of work. on the southern part of the project site. However, in lieu of planting street trees in firont of the offices and sanctuary north of the area of work, we propose to plant street: trees at the parking lot across the street on SW McKenzie and SW Grant. Our reasons for requesting the adjustment are to preserve existing parking in the right-of- way until additional parking is provided elsewhere on campus in a future phase of planned development, and to avoid planting trees that may have to be removed and replaced at that time. Benefits to the community include: maintaining existing on-site parking that reduces demand for street parking specifically on SW McKenzie, where it is in highest demand by neighboring commercial properties; softening the view of a parking lot rather than buildings; adding two more street trees than would be required to complete the east side of SW McKenzie; adding street trees at a parking lot that St. Anthony's would never be compelled to provide unless they change the use; and eventually getting street trees on the rest of SW McKenzie in future planned development. 2. We propose to reduce the number of bicycle parking spaces required by Code by 50%, from 36 to 18. We request this adjustment because St. Anthony's is a private school, almost all students are driven to school, and few live within bicycle range of school. Therefore, the few existing bicycle parking spaces are seldom used. Per the Technical Memorandum by Kittelson & Associates, we anticipate that Phase I development will not have a significant impact on the transportation system. The impact upon on-site bicycle parking should be negligible. 3. We propose to pay the fee-in-lieu of undergrounding utility linc;s on SW McKenzie. We request this adjustment because due to the nature of existing development on adjacent properties (i.e. small parcels), it is unlikely that utilities will be placed underground in the foreseeable future. Also, the existing utility poles have street lights that would have to be replaced with new poles. The trees the existing poles were made from have already been cut down. Expending energy and resources for new seems wasteful. 9 • 0 ATTACHMENTS. 8 V:?'xll": 1. Vicinity map. 2. Arborists Report, including Tree Protection Plan. 3. Neighborhood meeting materials, Including: • Affidavit of Mailing/Posting Neighborhood Meeting Notice. • Letter from Fr. Leslie Sieg, pastor, to neighbors within 500 ft. inviting them to attend the neighborhood meeting. • Attendance sheet. One person attended. • Meeting notes. 4. Traffic Evaluation from Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 5. Phase 1 Drainage Summary by Westlake Consultants. 6. Letter from Clean Water Services. 24"x36" Drawings: 1. ' Survey. 2. C1 Grading & Erosion Control Plan. 3. C2 Utility Plan. 4. L1.01 Landscape Plan 5. A1.01 Campus & Zoning Site Plan. 3. A1.02 Demolition Site Plan. 4. A1.03 Architectural Site Plan. 5. LS Fire- & Life-Safety Plan 6. A3.01 Middle School Elevations. 7. A3.02 Gymnasium 10 V CleanWater Services Onr ~:untr!iln!c!!I i, cic•,!r. October 7, 2002 Westlake Consultants Kim Shera 15115 SW Sequoia Pkwy, Suite 1 5;0 Tigard, OR 97224 40 Re: Expansion of St. Anthony's Church at 9905 SW McKenzie St, Tigard (CWS File 2403, Tax map 2S102BD, Tax lot 100) Clean Water Services has reviewed your proposal for the above referenced activity on your site. Staff has conducted a pre-screen review and requested completion of a Sensitive Areas Certification Form. Following the review it appears that sensitive areas do not exist on-site or within 200' from your project. In light of this result, this document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 00-7, Section 3.02.1, and your Stormwater Connection authorization from Clean Water Services as required by Ordinance 27, Section 4.13. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local, state, and federal law. This concurrence letter does NOT eliminate the need to protect sensitive areas if they are subsequently identified on your site. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 503-846-3613. Sincerely, G~ Heidi K. Berg Environmental Plan Review E:\Development Svcs\SP 00-7\Concurrence Letters\2S102BD00100 St Anthony's Church.doc 155 N First Avenue, Suite 270 • Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 Phone: (503) 846-8621 • Fax: (503) 846-3525 • www.cleanwaterservices. oro 10/0342002 13:27 WESTLPV.F CONSULTANTS 3 y5b~~4~rrir, CleanWateTN\N Servic E M P rN 1 File Number' ;71 q0 13 Our COR1NItTnCrtt i5 CtCd[, OCT 2002 Sensitive Area Pre-~Screening Site Assessment :`YEST(An~ CCP:SULT~I'liS, {lyC: - Jurisdiction City Of Tigard Date _g20zAar 24, 2CO2 Map & Tax Lot 25 202 ID-C= Owner 5t: Anth=vls Oira Site Address 9906 "N tie a- aid S&0xiI Tigard, CR 57I23 Contact Kim a-era, c,sstla)m axeiltarts Proposed Activity Ptmw I ©rwSim Address 15115 sa Sa=)ia PadgW sate 150 of St. Antficrty's Sdnni Tigard, CR 97224 Qmsbn tires GPT)&c itm & Dive Phone (5Ct3) GN-0652 Official use only below this line Y N NA Y N NA ❑ ❑ Sensitive Area Composite Map ❑ ❑ ❑ Stormwater Infrastructure maps map # 2.51 kJ✓tlt QS 4 (4319' Y N NA Y N NA ❑ ❑ Locally adopted studies or maps ❑ ❑ ® Other Specify Specify Based on a review of the above information and the requirements of Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Resolution and Order No. 00.-7: Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200' of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE 13F A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER OR STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties, a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. ❑ Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200' of the site. This pre- screening site assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. NO FURTHER SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. THIS FORM WILL SERVE AS AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE A STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. ❑ The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development. NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. Comments: Reviewed By: 155 N f Post-it" Fax Note 7671 +Date pages► 2 Phone: to u~ww. cl - l2ct rl (Cc l From K /i/l t. SCr~/Q. Co./Dept. A iuti ICo Phone # Phone # Fax # Fax # [)ate: 9- 30-0 4 Returned to Applicant Mail A Fax Counter_ Date `!-Te -o_ff. By 1 b/ k~..5/ ~~bG 1,3:2'( WLSILHKE CUNSULIHNIS 4 95032457710 -;0 tozoo3vzotsz d~ e' N0.443 9002 V • I I File Number An on-site, water-quality-sensitive area reconnaissance was completed on: Date By Title Company A. Existence of Water-Quality-Sensitive Areas As defined in the District's Design and Construction Standards, water-quality-sensitive areas: ❑ do ❑ do not exist on site (check appropriate box). ❑ do ❑ do not exist within 200' on adjacent properties, or ❑ unable to evaluate adjacent property (check appropriate box). • If water-quality-sensitive areas exist, complete Section B below. • If water-quality-sensitive areas do not exist, skip Section B, sign this form and submit to the District with plan approval package. B. Types of Water-Quality-Sensitive Areas The type(s) of water-quality-sensitive area(s) that occur on site or within 200 ft on adjacent properties are (check all that apply): ❑ wetland(s) ❑ spring(s) ❑ intermittent stream(s) ❑ perennial stream(s) ❑ ponds Sign this form and submit to the District with plan approval package and one (1) copy of the Natural Resources Assessment Report (information and forms are available through the District). • The Natural Resources Assessment Report includes: • Wetland Delineation Report per DSL / Corps reporting requirements (if wetlands present). • Rapid Stream Assessment Technique Form and maps or other District-approved assessment (if construction or discharge is proposed into, through, or across an intermittent or perennial streams). • Vegetated corridor documentation, including a base map and photographs showing the surveyed location of all sensitive areas, vegetated corridors, and vegetated corridor condition. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this document, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, this information is true, complete, and accurate. Property Owner: Print/Type Name Signature Print/Type Title Date C lean'Water `services Our Commitment is clea Water Quality Regulations Permitting Process This summary is intended to provide general information about Clean Water Services' water quality regulations. However, it is not a substitute for the regulations themselves. If you have any questions or concerns about how these new regulations may affect you, please contact Clean Water Services for additional information. Clean Water Services (the District) is a service district formed under ORS Chapter 451 with lead responsibility for urban surface water management in urban Washington County, including all of the incorporated cities. To better protect water quality within its service district, the District has adopted rules that affect how and where "development" can occur by requiring vegetated corridors, enhancement, and mitigation for impacts to "water quality sensitive areas". Water quality sensitive areas are land features which serve as water quality filtering systems, protect aquatic communities, or otherwise function to improve the water quality and quantity management of the storm and surface water system, and include any drainage system with a basin greater than 10 acres, wetlands, rivers, streams, springs, lakes and ponds. However, various types of man-made stormwater facilities are not considered "sensitive areas". The "vegetated corridor" is a corridor adjacent to a sensitive area that is preserved and maintained to protect the water quality functions of the sensitive areas. When did the rules go into effect? On February 22, 2000, these water quality protection rules went into effect for all of urban Washington County, including the incorporated cities of Banks, Beaverton, Cornelius, Durham, Forest Grove, Hillsboro, King City, North Plains, Sherwood, Tigard and Tualatin. Who is subject to the water quality regulations? These rules apply to all new "development", as defined below. Development under these rules refers to all human-induced changes to improved or unimproved real property including: . Construction of structures requiring a building permit if such structures are external to existing structures . Land division . Drilling . Site alterations resulting from surface mining or dredging . Grading . Construction of earthen berms . Paving . Excavating . Clearing when it results in the removal of trees or vegetation which would require a permit from the local jurisdiction or an Oregon Department of Forestry tree removal notification. Section 1.02.15, Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Resolution and Order 00-7 (R&O 00-7). As noted in the definition, "development" includes a wide range of activities such as land divisions, the construction of structures requirin building permit, grading, and excav g. However, the definition of "development" does not include thinstruction on a lot of record within MMibdivision which is inside the urban growth boundary and which was approved by a local government decision on a land use application under an acknowledged comprehensive plan after September 9, 1995. What's required? A Stormwater Connection Permit is required by the District for all "development". However, prior to issuance of U stormwater connection permit authorization, you will need either: . A pre-screening determination by the District or local jurisdiction that states that no water quality sensitive areas are within 200 feet of your development site; or . A Service Provider Letter from the District, which states that the District has reviewed and concurs with you proposed site plan. [Note: Clean Water Services strongly recommends that you obtain your Service Provider Letter prior to submitting your land use or building permit application to the City or County.] In order to get a Service Provider Letter and a Stormwater Connection Permit Authorization from Clean Water Services, you must comply with the District's Design and Construction Standards. This means that if you are proposing a project that meets the definition of "development", you must do the following: Step 1: Pre-Screening Determination Submit a completed Pre-Screening form and request that City or District stall` make a determination of whether your property is likely to require a site assessment under the current Design and Construction Standards. Based o mapped information and other available resources, City or District staff will tell you whether or not its likely that there are water quality sensitive areas on or near your property and provide you with documentation of their determination. 1. If the pre-screening determines that it is likely that there are water quality sensitive areas on or near your property, proceed to Step 2. 2. If the pre-screening determines it is not likely that there are water quality sensitive areas on or near your property, you may proceed with the land use or building permit application process. NOTE: The pre-screening does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and proteclt water quality sensitive areas if the, are subsequently discovered on your property. Step 2: Initial Site Assessment The applicant or authorized agent shall conduct an initial site assessment to determine if there are water quality sensitive areas present on the site or within 200 feet and complete the Sensitive Area Certification form. The inith site assessment shall include at a minimum; a site reconnaissance, the proposed site plan (with dimensions) and photographs documenting the location of the potential sensitive areas (keyed to the site plan). 1. If the initial site assessment indicates that there are water quality sensitive areas on or within 200 feet of your site, proceed to Step 3. 2. If the initial site assessment indicates that there are no water quality sensitive areas on or within 200 feet your site, submit the completed Sensitive Area Certification form, your proposed site plan, and supporting documentation to Clean Water Services. If the District concurs that there are no water quality sensitive are on site or within 200 feet, the District will issue a Service Provider Letter and Stormwater Connection Perm Authorization confirming. A copy of this letter should be submitted to the City or County with your land use or building permit application. Step 3: Natural Resource Assessment If the initial site assessment indicates that there are water quality sensitive areas present or within 200 feet of your site, you will need to complete a Natural Resource Assessment and determine appropriate vegetated corridors. Depending on your proposed site plan, you may also need to complete an Alternatives Analysis. You wil need to submit your Sensitive Are rtification form, Natural Resource A sment, Alternatives Analysis (if required) and Site Plan to Clean W Services. Please contact Clean WaRervices for further information. Step 4: Storm Water Connection Permit Prior to obtaining your building permit or site development permit, present your pre-screening determination or Service Provider Letter to the District with your proposed site plan. The District will review the information to be sure that the plan meets the District's requirements for water quality protection and issue the Stormwater Connection Permit Authorization. Where do I find more information? The complete text of the current Design and Construction Standards is available on our website at www.cleanwaterservices.org. Chapter 3 contains the regulations pertaining to water quality sensitive areas. Appendix C outlines the Natural Resource Assessment Methodology, and Appendix E provides information on landscape standards. For questions about Clean Water Services' water quality protection regulations or the process, contact: Clean Water Services 155 N First Avenue, Suite 270 Hillsboro, OR 97214 Phone: (503) 846-8339 Fax: (503) 846-3525 (c) 2002, Clean Water Services - Click Here For More Information Last Site Update: 09/18/201 • CleanWaterN Services Our comunitment is clear. I File Number Sensitive Areas Certification Form Property Owner Name Address City/State/Zip Telephone E-mail Authorized Agent Name Address City/State/Zip Telephone E-mail Project Location Street, road, or other descriptive location Legal Description: Quarter Section In or near (city or town) County Waterway River Mile Adjacent Property Information: Street, road, or other descriptive location Legal Description: Quarter Section In or near (city or town) County Waterway River Mile Fax Fax Township Range Tax Map # Tax Lot # Latitude Longitude Township Range Tax Map # Tax Lot # Latitude Longitude i • G1eanWater \ Services Our commitment is clear. Jurisdiction Map & Tax Lot Site Address Proposed Activity 41 File Number I Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment Date Owner Contact Address Phone Official use only below this line Y N NA Y N NA ❑ ❑ ❑ Sensitive Area Composite Map ❑ ❑ ❑ Stormwater infrastructure maps Map # QS # Y N NA Y N NA ❑ ❑ ❑ Locally adopted studies or maps ❑ ❑ ❑ Other Specify Specify Based on a review of the above information and the requirements of Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Resolution and Order No. 00-7: ❑ Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200' of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A, SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER OR STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties, a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. ❑ Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200' of the site. This pre- screening site assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. NO FURTHER SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. THIS FORM WILL SERVE AS AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE A STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. ❑ The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development. NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. Comments: Reviewed By: 155 N First Avenue, Suite 270 • Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 Phone: (503) 846-8621 9 Fax: (503) 846-3525 wivx~:. cleanwa terscrvices. ora Date: Returned to Applicant Mail_ Fax Counter Date By -Ik"", • C...l,eallwat~ services Our commitment is cle.a Stormwater Site Assessment and Alternatives Analysis RevieIN Fees J Stormwater Site Assessment and Alternatives Analysis Review Fees shall be charged for customers requiring a service provider letter or site certification concurrence in accordance with Clean Water Services (formerly USA) current Design and Construction Standards (R&O 00-7). Basic Site Certification Concurrence Fee - $25.00 The basic site certification concurrence fee will be charged for properties where there is no sensitive area or vegetated corridor on or adjacent to the site or for properties on which the proposed development has no negativ, impact to the sensitive area or corridor. Allowed Use Site Certification Concurrence Fee - $50.00 The allowed use site certification concurrence fee will be charged for properties on which the proposed development is an allowed use as defined in Section 3.02.4.b.i.a-g of above reference R&O, and which has an impact to the sensitive area or vegetated corridor on site. Corridor Averaging/ Reduction Site Certification Concurrence Fee - $150.00 The corridor averaging/ reduction site certification concurrence fee will be charged for properties on which corridc averaging or corridor reduction is requested. Tier 1 Alternatives Analysis Review Fee - $500.00 The Tier 1 Alternatives Analysis Review Fee will be charged for development requesting a Tier 1 encroachment as defined in section 3.02.5.b of R&O 00-7. Tier 2 Alternatives Analysis Review Fee - $750.00 The Tier 2 Alternatives Analysis Review Fee will be charged for development requesting a Tier 2 encroachment as defined in section 3.02.5.c of R&O 00-7. 0 ARBORIST REPORT Nature of the Report: Site Review Address of the Report: St. Anthony's School & Church Property ATTN: Father Leslie Fieg 9905 SW McKenzie Street Tigard, Oregon 97233 Date of the Report: October 8, 2002 Report Submitted To: Ankrom Moisan Associate Architects PH: 503-245-7100 Attn: Dan Salazar FX: 503-245-7710 6720 SW Macadam Ave., Suite 100 Portland, OR 97219 We reviewed the trees on site on October 7, 2002 and have provided the tree survey as required by the City of Tigard. Tree locations need to be noted on your plans. We have estimated their location and modified our plan copy to show them. We can share that information with you if you need it. The trees within the construction area will require tree protection with the exception of the trees to be removed. Enclosed is a tree protection plan. Please call if I can be of further service or if you have questions. Respectfully, Raymond Myer, General Manager Tree Care & Landscapes Unlimited, Inc. Certified Arborist by the International Society of Arboriculture, License # PN-0160 Oregon Landscape Contractors Lic. # 11604 Oregon Dept. of Agriculture, Commercial Pesticide Applicators License # 00187 isidential and Commercial Spraying • Fertilizing • Pruning- Landscape Installation o Landscape Maintenance • Consultation MEMBER: National Arborist Association 0 International Society of Arboriculture o Oregon Association of Nurserymen Oregon Golf Course Superintendents'Association • Oregon Landscape Contractors Association State Licensed Tree Service #62635 . Landscape Contractor #5659,, Chemical Application #000231 . Insured P.O. Box 1566 * Lake Oswego, OR 97035,p 503-635-3165 • Vancouver 360-737-2(346,o FAX 503-635-1549 Visit our website at wmv.treecarelandscapes.com Follow the below listed instructions in order to provide the proper protection before, during and after construction. 1. Before Construction: a. Identify the trees to be protected, verify by mapping and/or tagging and note their size in D.B.H. (Diameter at Breast Height); variety, health and structural conditions, review plans. b. Check with local government agencies for tree protection ordinances. c. Remove any low limbs that may be in the way of construction equipment, and prune as needed to adhere NAA standards. d. Leave a protective covering on the soil, i.e., existing groundcover or mulch. e. Notify all other contractors that these trees are to be saved and protected. f. install a temporary 6' high metal no-climb fence to protect the trees and their root systems. For every inch in diameter of the trunk (D.B.H.) allow 1 foot of radius from the trunk as the protected area. (Example: 24" D.B.H. = 24' radius of protected root system.) We need to protect more than the drip zone. The drip zone into the trunk are the support roots that hold the tree up. The roots from that drip zone out provide nutrition, water and oxygen. g. Identify any insect or disease problems that may require treatment. h. Engineer and design proposed structures and construction to avoid root loss. Bridge type foundations can save major roots. i. Design landscape islands and planting areas large enough to accommodate trees at maturity. j. Plant the right tree in the right place. Avoid future conflicts with buildings and utilities. k. Have an experienced Arborist review landscape plan. 1. Consider tree removals adjacent to trees to be saved for wind related stability concerns. m. Check for past and proposed grade and drainage changes, consider the effects. Residential and Commercial Spraying - Fertilizing - Pruning - Landscape Installation - Landscape Maintenance - Consultation MEMBER: National Arborist Association 4 International Society of Arboriculture - Oregon Association of Nurserymen Oregon Golf Course Superintendents' Association - Oregon Landscape Contractors Association State Licensed Tree Service #62635,, Landscape Contractor #5659 - Chemical Application #000231 - Insured P.O. Box 1566 • Lake Oswego, OR 97035 - 503-635-3165 - Vancouver 360-737-2646 - FAX 503-635-1549 Visit our website at wdvw.treecarelandscapes,corn n. Check trees for stability. /1 o. Remove all trees that would not survive the effects of change. Remove all hazardous trees. p. Minimize environmental changes. H. Durina Construction: a. Keep equipment off of the root system to avoid compaction. b. Keep equipment away from structure to prevent damage to trunk and limbs. c. Don't allow chemicals to be dumped on the ground near the tree, i.e., gasoline, diesel, paint, herbicide, cleaner, thinners, etc. d. Provide means of temporary irrigation if the project: runs through the summer. e. If roots or limbs are cut or damaged, have them inspected by an ISA Certified Arborist and repaired or treated according to his/heir recommendations. f. Protect the trees from excessive heat, i.e., equipment, paving and/or burning. g. Avoid trenching through the root systems, boring under them or hand digging can save roots. III. After Construction: a. Carefully landscape the area under the tree, being careful of the roots and structure. Use plantings that will live under the same conditions as that of the tree. b. Provide insect and disease control, fertilization as needed. c. Avoid direct irrigation spraying onto the trunk. d. Do not cover existing root systems with more than " of soil. The more soil you add, the greater the chances of damaging the root system. e. Provide irrigation and/or drainage to emulate pre-construction conditions. NOTE: It would be impossible to provide all of the above protection measures, however the more roots that can be saved and the least amount of surrounding environmental changes that we can prevent; the greater the chances of saving existing trees. Often it is best to replant with the right tree in the right place so it can grown in the new environment. 01 TREE CARE UNLIMITED " St. Anthony's Church & School TREE SURVEY Specie I D.B.H. Condition 1 I European White Birch ( 10.8" I Under 12" D,B.H. 2 { European White Birch 1 9.8" I Under 12" D.B.N. 3 I European White Birch 110.8" Under 12" D.B.H. 4 I European white Birch 116.5" I Non-Viable 5 I European White Birch 10.5" { Under 12" D.B.H. 6 ( Cypress 1 10.7" { Under 12" D.B.H. 7 { Ponderosa Pine j 10.8 I Under 12" D.B.H. 8 I Sycamore ► 30.5 I Viable 9 { Norway Spruce 21 I Viable 10 { Catalpa 23.7 I Viable 11 I Coast Pine 114 I Viable 12 I Coast Pine 110.5 I Under 12" D.B.H. 13 { Coast Pine 116.25 I Viable 14 I Douglas Fir. ( 20.25 ( Viable IS I Douglas Fir 118.5 I Viable 16 I Douglas Fir 1 18.8 Viable 17 I Douglas Fir 1 18 I Viable 18 1 Kwanzan Cherry 18.25 I Viable 19 I Kwanzan Cherry { 15.6 I Viable 20 I Kwanzan Cherry 15.6 I Viable '21 I Kwanzan Cherry 116.25 I Viable 22 1 Weeping Cherry 110.5 1 Under 12" D.B,H. 23 1 Kwanzan Cherry 114.6 1 Viable 24 I Norway Maple { 18 I Viable 25 I Giant Sequoia 151 1 Viable 26 I Giant Sequoia 147.5 I Viable 27 I Norway Maple 118 1 Viable 28 I Native Dogwood 111.7 I Under 12" D.B.H. 29 I Sweetqum 15.2 I Viabfe 30 Sweetqum 112.4 I Viable 31 I Weeping Cherry 112.5 I Viable 32 Green Spruce 114 1 Viable 33 1 Dawn Redwood 1 12.4 1 Viable 34 Mt. Ash 1 11.7 Under 12" D.B.H. 35 Western Red Cedar 116.75 I Viable 36 I Blue Spruce 1 8.5 1 Under 12" D.B.H. 37 1 Pussy Willow 1 14.6 1 Viable 38 Green Spruce 19.4 I Viable 39 I Incense Cedar 30.5 I Viable 503 635 1549 P.02i02 I Additional Comments { Rot & decay due to past topping I Rot & decay due to past topping { Rot & decay due to past toppinq Rot & decay due to past topping { Rot & decay due to past topping { Multi, topped 20` lean, trunk insects I Topped, crowded by Sycamore I Crowded by Sycamore I Crowded by Sycamore Crowded by Sycamore I Single tree Single tops I Pruned away street side for power lines Pruned away street side for power lines Pruned away street side for power lines ImpropE!r planting, raising parking lot Crowded by Sequoia Crowded by Sequoia Straight single trunks Co-dominant top Topped too close by bldq Multi-topped 1/2 of top broken or removed Multi trunk, top too close to bldg NOTE: Non-viable trees are dead, dying, hazardous, diseased, containing structural defects Trees # 11, 12, 32 - 38 (9 trees total) to be removed for bldg const. = 121.85' D.B.H. Total # of trees over 12" D.B.H.= 28 trees, 560.05" D.B.H Non-Viable = 1 trees. 16..5" D.B.H. Viabjp _27 treg~,-„543.55" D.B.H. Residential and Commercial Spraying o Fertilizing o Pruning o Landscape Installation o Landscape Maintenance • Consultation MEMBER: National Arborist Association ° International Society of Arboriculture a Oregon Association of Nurserymen Oregon Golf Course Superintendents' !Association o Oregon Landscape Contractors Association Slate Licensed Tree Service ;#62635 ° Landscape Contractor 45659 % Chemical Application 4000231 m Insured P.O. Box 1566 ^ Lake Oswego, OR 97035 • 503-635-3166 o Vancouver 360-737-2646 ° FAX 503-635-1549 Visit our website at www.treecarolandscapes.com TOTAL P.02 10/09/02 12:48 $500 625 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL PO BOX 820 Sherwood, OR 97140 Phone: 503.625-6177 Fax 503-625-6179 Fm To: Dan Salazar Proem Craig Schmidt Fa m 503-245-7710 Fate: October :3, 2002 Phone:. Pages: 1 Re: Site puns fur trash enclosures CC_- [I Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please ReVty ❑ Please Recycle •cors "Wntst Dan Salazar, l have reviewed your plans showing trash ee7closures and the increase (18'-10") in size is acceptable at St. Anthony's Church & School. Thank you, Craig WS NOV-20-2002 12:18 ANKROM MOISAN ARCHITECT S 503 245 7710 P.01i04 • 0 FAX MESSAGE ANKROM MOISAIV ASSOCIATED ARCHITECTS To: Brad Kilby - . planning Project: St. Anthony's Firm: City of Tigard Project No.: 2112752 Date: 11120/02 Fax :Number: (503) 684-7297 No. of Pages 4 Message: Tree mitigation. The church provided me with the attached information abut the fir trees that were taken down last Summer. I see that the work was done by A.B. Crisman Logging & Tree Service (503) 635-4179. 1 have a call in to them now to inquire about an arborist's report, Distribution: From: Drew Rocker Please call if you had any problems in receiving this transmission or if there are pages missing. 6720 SW Macadam. Suite 100, Portland, Oregon 97219, 503/245-7100, FAX 503/2457710 Principals: Stamm Ankrom, 7bomas Moisan, David N. Vamta. lnrrWnc Kellow, Jeff Hamiltou, Karen Bowery August 9, 2002 i Dick Sherwood 11565 SW Hazelbrook Rd. Tualatin, OR 97062 RE: Tree removal at St. Anthony's Church Dear Dick: CITY OF TIGARD OREGON After review of all available City records relating to St. Anthony's Church, I am unable to find any reason the trees that you are proposing to be removed cannot be removed. However, as I indicated in our meeting, St. Anthony's would be required to consider those trees when applying for any new development within the next 12 months. It is essential that you consider a certified arborist to perform the work to ensure that your property and your neighbor's property is protected by their insurance. If you have any questions, call me at (503)639-4171. Sincerely, Brad Kilby Associate Planner 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 • State of Oregon Department of Forestry / Department of Revenue Notification number: 2002-531-20651 [53114740] Attached is the processed information from the Notification of Operation and/or Application for Permits. Please review this information and retain for future! reference. [X] - Notice is given to the State Forester that an operation will be conducted on the: lands described herein (ORS 527.670). [X] - A permit to operate power driven machinery is issued for the lands described herein (ORS 477.625) EXPIRES END OF 2002. RECEIVED PLANNING UGB/Forest Practices are regulated by the City of Tigard contact Brad Kilby (503) 639 4171 Ext 2434 " U G 1 9 2002 riTV r4: TY;A1;n I. WHERE TIMBER HARVESTING IS PART OF THE PROPOSED OPERATION: District. Forest Grove Office: Forest Grove A. NOTICE TO TIMBER OWNER: Party owning the harvested timber at the point it is first measured is shown in the section marked TIMBER OWNER and is responsible for payment of Oregon timber taxes. County: Washington WOSTOT: B. NOTICE TO LAND OWNER: Party shown in the section marked LAND OWNER is responsible for reforestation of the site if so required. II. PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE STATE FORESTER AND WRITTEN PLANS: [ - A PRIOR APPROVAL may be required before certain activities can commence on the Operation. A WRITTEN PLAN may be required for the situations indicated by an [X] below. Approval of a WRITTEN PLAN or a WRITTEN WAIVER must be obtained from the Forest Practices Forester before any portion of the operation may commence. Received by ODF on August 7, 2002 at 1100 *15 DAY WAITING PERIOD REQUIRED* N O T I C E The State Forester has determined that the following items requiring your attention are located within or adjacent to your operation area: [ ] - Concerns [ ] - Resources [ ] - Water [ - Within 100 feet of a large lake or Type F or Type D stream. [OAR 629-605-170(1)(a)] See Unit Information on subsequent pages for details. [ - Within 300 feet of a wildlife resource site listed in the Operator: 1984 ODF/ODFW Cooperative Agreement. [OAR 629-605-170(1)(b)] A B Crisman Logging & Tree Servic [ - Within 300 feet of any resource identified in the 700,800 14940 SW 81St Avenue or 2300 series administrative rules. [OAR 629-605-170(1) (c)] Tigard, OR 97224 Phone:: ( 503 ) 639-2925 [ - Within 300 feet of a state or federally listed threatened or endangered wildlife resource site. [OAR 629-605-170(1)(d)] Land owner: Please contact the Forest Practices Forester named on the unit Information sheet for further information on requirements that may be necessary to meet before any activity/operation begins. Signed by Frances L. Avery - representing the Land owner. City Of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 (Subscriber) St Ali-1 ony Church & ScilUO1 9905 SW McKenzie Street Tigard, OR 97223 Phone: ( 503 ) 639-4179 Timber owner: Phone: James E. Brown State Forester District Forester Department of Forestry Notification: 02-20651 Unit: 1 status: Active Forest Practices Forester: Brent O'Nion Phone number: (503) 359-7442 Start date: 8/10/2002 End date: 9/03/2002 Site conditions: No Protected Waters within 100 ft Slope of 0% to 35% No mass soil movement Acres: 1 Feet: Activity: Clear cut methods: Ground Sc Twp Rge Government lot 02 02S O1W Estimated harvest: 9000 MBF [53114740] FP = N FPA = N N E N W S W S E n n s s n n s s n n s s n n s s Harv Reg e w w e e w w e e w w e e w w e tax use X WV1 • KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING N 610 SW ALDER, SUITE 700 • PORTLAND, OR 97205 • (503) 228-5230 • FAX(503)273-8169 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM St. Anthony's School/Church Redevelopment Traffic Evaluation Date: November 12, 2002 To: Brian Rager, City of Tigard From: Judith Gray Project* 5610 cc: Father Leslie Sieg St. Anthony's School and Church proposes to redevelop the existing site located on Highway 99W between SW McKenzie Street and SW Johnson Street in Tigard, Oregon. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. was asked to evaluate the traffic impacts associated with the proposed project. The redevelopment plan includes the following: Phase 1A Gymnasium: Physical education building and gymnasium with support facilities including locker rooms and PE teacher office (approximately 10,500 square feet). Middle School & Library: Remodel of existing; building with slight expansion (220 square feet), including two classrooms and enlarged library and media center facilities. The expansion will increase the school capacity from 400 to 450 students. Phase IB Community Center: Assembly building including kitchen, toilet rooms, mechanical room and storage (approximately 15,000 square feet). Site Development: Addition of approximately 33 spaces around buildings, and modifying on-site vehicle circulation by providing internal connection between SW Grant and SW Johnson Avenues, and increased on-site passenger loading area. The existing and proposed site plans are shown in Figures I and 2, respectively. M-ENAME: H:\projfile\5610\repon\5610TMEM.doc St. Anthony's School/Church Redevelopment Project 5610 November 12, 2002 Page 2 Existing Traffic Operations The peak weekday traffic periods for St. Anthony's correspond to the beginning and end of the school day at St. Anthony's school. The school day runs from. 8 a.m. through 3 p.m. each weekday, except for Wednesday, when school ends at 2 p.m. Kitte:lson & Associates, Inc. visited the site during a Thursday afternoon and Friday morning to observe peak period traffic operations for St. Anthony's. The majority of vehicles access St. Anthony's school and church utilizing a one-way circulation pattern. Traffic entering from Highway 99W turns northwest on SW McKenzie Avenue, which is a one-way road, turns right onto SW Grant Avenue, and turns right onto SW Johnson Avenue. Avenue. Left-turn restrictions into parking areas on SW Johnson Avenue reinforce the one-way circulation pattern. Passenger loading/unloading occurs primarily on site with some on adjacent streets, but is concentrated at parking lots accessed by SW Grant Avenue and SW Johnson. Congestion in the parking/passenger loading areas occurred during both the morning and afternoon peak periods before and after school. In both cases, vehicle queues spilled onto the adjacent streets (SW Grant and Johnson Avenues). Queues on SW Johnson Avenue extended to SW Grant Avenue and wrapped around the corner along SW Grant Avenue. Although the queues occurred during both peak periods, the duration of the congested conditions was short, lasting only 15 to 20 minutes in both cases. SW Grant Avenue has narrow lanes and vehicles are unable to pass queues without entering the opposing traffic lanes. However, background traffic in the area has an alternative route via SW Walnut Street, which has a traffic signal at the intersection with Highway 99W. SW Johnson Street is wide enough for vehicles to by-pass queues without encroaching in the opposing lane. While the queuing conditions at the parking lot entrances are, not ideal, they do not represent a significant operational or safety concern because they occur at. predictable times, they are of very short duration, and the signalized Highway 99W/SW Walnut Street intersection provides an alternative routes for non-school traffic. The Highway 99W/SW Johnson Street and Highway 99W/SW McKenzie Street intersections operated acceptably during both observation periods. The only delays were related to downstream traffic on Highway 99W, and not from traffic generated by the St. Anthony's site. Development Impacts The proposed development plan is generally intended to improve facilities for existing activities, rather than increase attendance or event capacity. Only the raiddle school remodel is expected to accommodate increased activity. Specifically, the additilanal two classrooms will increase enrollment capacity from 400 to 450 students. Trip Generation St. Anthony's does not provide bus or shuttle service, so the majority of students are dropped off and picked up by passenger vehicles. Currently, there are 380 students enrolled from 277 families, for an average of 1.4 children per family. According to church personnel, some families Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon St. Anthony's School/Church Redevelopment Project 5610 November 12, 2002 Page 3 are able to carpool with each other. Therefore, presuming that the ratio remains somewhat constant, the additional 50-student capacity could result in approximately 30 to 35 additional vehicles dropping off/picking up children at the start and end of the school day. Intersection Operations Given the observed adequacy of intersection operations of the Highway 99W/SW Johnson Street and Highway 99W/SW McKenzie Street intersections during these periods, the increased traffic resulting from the proposed development plan will not significantly impact traffic operations. Vehicle Queuing The proposed development plan includes modifications to the internal circulation and provision of approximately 360 feet along the front of the future Community Center for passenger loading/unloading, in addition to increased drive aisles in the pa4 ing areas that could internalize peak period vehicle queues. Thus, queuing conditions will likely improve once the proposed redevelopment is complete. Summary Field observations indicate that the St. Anthony's School and Church have no significant impacts on the transportation system, with the exception of queue spillback at the parking lot driveways. The queuing conditions are of short duration, lasting approximately 15 to 20 minutes during the peak morning arrival and afternoon departure periods. Residents in the area have an alternative route to access Highway 99W via the signalized intersection with SW Walnut Street. Therefore, it is not a significant operational or safety concern. The proposed development plan will increase student enrollment capacity at the school, which would result in approximately 30 to 35 additional vehicles during these peak periods. This increase is not expected to significantly impact traffic operations in the vicinity. Furthermore, the modified site circulation plan, with designated passenger loading area, will likely improve the current peak period queuing conditions. Based on this evaluation, the proposed redevelopment can occur while maintaining safe and efficient operations of the surrounding transportation system. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us at 503-228-5230. Sincerely, N & ASSOCIATES, INC. 'Judith Grey/ Transno tion Planner /r andehey, P. . rincipal Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon t 11 ~z L1 \-J4 SW JOHNSON STREET ' . . . . . . . . . . ~ r,~: . - --Fes---~ EXISTING \ CONVENT QPARKI'NG I 1 EXISTING SCHOOL I •I / F } J o~ 11111111 Z 0 1 I EXISTING ` i MIDDLE SCHOOL ~ AND LIBRARY ILI: 1 ' . . . . . . . . . . . . V , 1 EXISTING SANCTUARY / ---------------SW MCKENZIE STREET ~EXISTIN 1 OVERFLOW PARKING Y I I IlI II ! 1 1 1 1 1 lllllllillllllllll'! w EXISTING CAMPUS PLAN ST. ANTHONY'S CHURCH AND SCHOOL MASTER PLAN ADDENDUM FIGURE TIGARD, OREGON NOVEMBER 2002 NIX cain;:imsnWG obi r, 2 U LL U Q i I I N i <iiiiiii(ii f ; 4 ( . . i ~f 1 r 1~ 1 t] 00 i I If I , III, i:° 1. x 1 J S:A]XdY aa•~slo NOR TAI (NOT TO SCALE 0 FIi~Uiit _ NOVEMBER > La1 , v~.~~:t'_' ~1 IP M1!i!' C L. (~ftf , o ~...-p r 1 ?.I .1 I L: ~ ~ r' n~ 1 7 T-£ ~J 0^ 4 N 5T _ . ' - - ' . g I r_ ti if TI f t I. 1 -lot r ws!a RMR j Et? St Anthony School & Church Phase I Drainage Summary Existinc Conditions The site of the existing St Anthony School and Church consists of multiple buildings, parking lots and open space. Phase I of the school improvemems include building a new gymnasium in an area that is currently an open grassy space with a small amount of asphalt and an existing building. Future phases include a new community center and elementary school and additional parking areas. Water Ouality There is a proposed water quality swale at the northeast corner of the site in a natural low spot. The net new impervious area for Phase I is 17,490 SF, but the net new impervious surface for Phase I and future phases of construction was used to design the swale. This net new impervious area for Phase I and future phases was 86,790 SF. Please see the attached table that summarizes the impervious surface calculations. The swale was designed to treat the water for future phases not just Phase 1. The proposed swale would have a bottom width of 2 feet, depth of 0.3 feet, and 4:1 side slopes. Please see the enclosed calculation sheet that shows a 105 linear foot Swale is required for the 9 minute residence time. Water Ouantity This site is.located in the Fanno Creek Drainage basin therefore detention is mandatory per Lee Walker with Clean Water Services. The downstream ,analysis did not show any deficiencies therefore we are providing detention according to Clean Water Services basic requirements. The basic detention requirements are to detain the post development site run off and release it at the predeveloped rate for the full range of storms which includes the 2, 5, 10 and 25 year. Detention was only provided for Phase I construction. In future phases of construction detention will need to be provided and a connection made to the existing system upstream of the water quality swale. The Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph (SBUH) method was used to determine the peak runoff rates for proposed and existing conditions. This method uses the NCRS Type IA rainfall distribution and 24 hour storm duration. The rainfall intensities were taken from the Clean Water Services Design Standards Appendix A. The rainfall depths used for the 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 year storms were 2.5, 3.1, 3.45, 3.9, 4.2, and 4.5 inches respectively. Please see Table 1 of the Stormwater Summary Tables Sheet. The time of concentration calculations are also attached. The site of the new gymnasium currently slopes north towards the existing middle school at about 3% to an area drain, and grassy ditch. The existing or predeveloped time of concentration was calculated for the sheet flow across the grassy area to the area drain at the south side of the existing middle school. After construction there will be sheet flow down the driveway before it reaches a catch basin or across the rooftops into the roof drain system. The Soil Survey of Washington Countv Oregon. published by the Soil Conservation Service was used to determine the soil type. The soils are Huberly silt loam, Hydrologic Group D and Aloha, Hydrologic Group C. The Huberly silt loam is in the area of the Phase I construction. Please see the attached pages out of the Soil Survey Book. A curve number of 80 was used for the pervious areas and a curve number of 98 was used for the impervious areas. The table that these curve numbers were taken from is attached for your reference. The required detention for the construction of the gymnasium was calculated using the King County HYD Program. It was also used to calculate the depth of storm water in the detention pipes. Please see Table 2 of the Stormwater Summary Tables Sheet. The proposed detention pipes will be parallel pipes that are 36" in diameter. The detention volume required for the gymnasium construction is 698 CF and the detention provided is 750 CF. Downstream Analvsis The outlet for the proposed water quality swale is a 12" at 0.51NO. This line connects to an existing manhole on the east side of Johnson Street. The peak runoff for the 25 year post developed conditions is 0.64 cfs for St Anthony's Phase I which is less than the available capacity of the existing 12" at storm line at 2% which has a capacity of 5 cfs. Due to the location of the site in the Fanno Creek Basin, detention is required even though the downstream system has capacity to handle the developed storm water flows for this Phase of construction. IMPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATIONS USED TO DESIGN WATER QUALITY SWALE EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREAS Description Area (SF) Elementary School 11,700 Middle School 12,800 Sanctuary & Offices 14,100 Convent 2,700 Modulars (3 total) 4,700 St Vincent dePaul 1,850 Parking Lot 75,800 Sidewalks 14,100 Total = 137,750 PHASE I OF MASTER PLAN IMPERVIOUS AREA REMOVED PHASE I Description Area (SF) St Vincent dePaul (1,900) Parking Lot (2,450) Total = (4,350) IMPERVIOUS AREA AD[ Description Gymnasium Driveway & Sidewalk Middle School Addition Total = )ED PHASE I Area (SF) 12,100 9,600 140 21,840 NET NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA PHASE I = 17,490 SF `NET NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA FOR PHASE I & FUTURE PHASES= FUTURE PHASES OF MASTER PLAN IMPERVIOUS AREA REMOVED IN FUTURE PHASES Description Area (SF) Buildings (19,100) Parking Lot (45,200) Total = (64,300) IMPERVIOUS AREA Description Community Center Glnmont~rv ~r.hnnl Parking Lot Total = ,ADDED IN FUTURE PHASES Area (SF) 17,600 16.900 99,100 133,600 NET NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA FUTURE PHASES = 86,790 SF 69,300 SF • NOTE: The water quality swale was designed for 87,000 SF in order to accommodate future development Location: ST ANTHONY SCHOOL PHASE I Date: 9/11:12002 Job 1095-09 Tigard, Oregon Water Quality Flow: F:.:.. A = 17490 sf = 0.36 inches WQF = 0.04 cfs S,wale,Design Data: Q = 0.04 Design flow rate (c.f.s.) n = 0.24 manning's n S = 0.005 longitudinal slope of swale (ft/ft) b = 2.00 width of bottom (ft.) Z = 4.00 side slope (ft/ft) Solve for flow depth by trial and error: y (ft) b (ft) T (ft) 0.1000 3.48 4.28 0.1500 1.37 2.57 0.1400 1.65 2.77 0.1300 ( 1.98 3.02 0.1290 2.02 3.05 Determine velocity due to design storm: y = 0.129 found from trial and error. A = 0.32 sq. ft. V=Q/A V = 0.11 ft/s < 0.9 ft/s OK Determine required length: L=(V)(t)(60) t = 9.00 min (minimum required) V = 0.11 ft/s L= 60.62 Use Minimum Swale Length • 110 ST ANTHONYS WATER QUALITY VOLUME AND FLOW CALCULATION FOR PHASE 1 & FUTURE PHASES Water Quality Volume (ftW) = 0.36 (in) x Impervious Area (ft) 12 (in/ft) Water Quality Volume (ft3) = 0.36 (in) x 87,000 (ft2) 12 (in/ft) Water Quality Volume (ft3) = 2610 ft3 Water Quality Volume (ft3lsec) = Water Quality Volume (ft3) . (4hr) (60min./hr) (60 sec/min) Water Quality Volume (ft3~sec) = 2610 ft3 (4hr) (60min./hr) (60 sec/min) Water Quality Volume (ft3lsec) = 0.18 (ft3/se!c) 1 0. 110 . ~,r r 4 y k.S v °Br10=FILi -000. ON ;SWALE :DESIGN Location: ST ANTHONY PHASE 1 & FUTURE PHASES Date: 9/1 V2002 Job 1095-09 Tigard, Oregon Water;Quality.Flow. , h1 r,^YJ . }lkY. . ~E A = 87000 sf I = 0.36 inches WQF = 0.18 cfs Swale Design Data: Q = 0.18 Design flow rate (c.f.s.) n = 0.24 manning's n S = 0.005 longitudinal slope of swale (ft/ft) b = 2.00 width of bottom (ft.) Z = 4.00 side slope (ft/ft) Solve for flow depth by trial and error: y (ft) I. b (ft) I T (ft) 0.5000 I -0.69 I 3.31 0.4000 I 0.31 I 3.51 0.3000 I 1.88 I 4.28 0.2800 I 2.34 I 4.58 0.2950 I 1.99 + 4.35 Determine velocity due to design storm: y = 0.295 found from trial and error A = 0.94 sq. ft. V=Q/A V = 0.19 ft/s < 0.9 ft/s, OK Determine required length: L=(V)(t)(60) t = 9.00 min (minimum required) V = 0.19 ft/s L= 104.33 ft ok ST ANTHONYS WATER QUANTITY STORMWATER SUMMARY TABLES TABLE 1: PRE-DEVELOPED vs POST-DEVELOPED CONDITION PRE-DEVELOPED POST-DEVELOPED CONDITION CONDITION I PERVIOUS AREA (acres) I 0.64 I 0.26 CURVE NUMBER I 80 I 80 IMPERVIOUS AREA (acres) I 0.12 I 0.50 CURVE NUMBER I 98 I 98 TOTAL AREA OF PHASE I (acres) I 0.76 I 0.76 TIME OF CONCENTRATION (minutes) I 27 I 5 Q weak (2-yr, 24 hour storm) (cfs) I 0.13 I 0.37 i Q weak (5-yr, 24 hour storm) (cfs) I 0.20 0.48 Q peak (10-yr, 24 hour storm) (cfs) 0.24 0.55 Q peak (25-yr, 24 hour storm) (cfs) I 0.30 I 0.64 Q peak (50-yr, 24 hour storm) (cfs) I 0.34 0.70 Q peak (100-yr, 24 hour storm) (cfs) I 0.38 0.76 TABLE 2: DETENTION FACILITY-36" Pipes PEAK RUNOFF PEAK RUNOFF WATER OUT FROM PIPES OUT FROM PIPES E LEVATION (CFS) (CFS) (FT) TARGET ACTUAL IN PIPE 2-YEAR, 24-HOUR STORM EVENT 0.13 0.18 0.75 5-YEAR, 24-HOUR STORM EVENT I 0.20 I 0.22 I 1.06 10-YEAR, 24-HOUR STORM EVENT I 0.24 I 0.25 I 1.37 125-YEAR, 24-HOUR STORM EVENT I 0.30 I 0.30 I 2.00 50-YEAR, 24-HOUR STORM EVENT + 0.34 I 0.67 I 2.11 100-YEAR, 24-HOUR EVENT I 0.38 I 0.60 I 2.09 ST ANTHONYS TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS SHEET FLOW OF PRE-DEVELOPED SITE TI(j) _ (0.93Lo.6 X no .3) / (io.a X So.s) n = 0.15 (sheet flow Manning's effective roughness coefficient) L = 200 (flow length ft) i = 2.0 (rainfall intensity in inches per hour) S = 0.03 (slope of hydraulic grade line ft/ft) TI(j) = (travel time) 27 (minutes) SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW OF DEVELOPED SITE Paved area @ 5% slope Velocity = 4.5 feet per second Length = 120 feet Time = Lenqth = 120 feet = 26 seconds Velocity 4.5 fps Use time of concentration = 5 minutes T:\BLOCKS\DETAILS\USA\010-CH3.dwg 0 0 0 0 a n N 00 0 0 0 N O 0 d r1 N - - \ ^IIT O m co n to to o- n N .-000 0 0 0 0 0 66666 0 0 0 0 I t\ to 1 I 0 I I I a I I 1 1 1 f ° N ~O co I I(D to It N I \ ~ ~ U ^I O 0 I v I 1 10 I a r\ ° ^ \ N r O 00 o 0 0 0 ornm to to a PI) N to a N -0000 O O O O O O O O O O O 66666 O O O O O 0 (}j/};) adolS asino»a;oM AVERAGE VELOCITIES FOR ESTIMATING TRAVEL TIME FOR OVERLAND FLOWS* *For use with the Rational Method only, From Soil Conservation Service, Tech. Release No. 55, January 1975 DRAWING NO. 010-CH3 0 to 0 0 0 0 00 ~~'~L f. ,_,I i3 f', O N n • f. l 3 jai 3 ~ : ~ r,. n • .k+yrt4~; ,;fir, ,r Q) Y.'Jf,.~4T•I.Dr♦'K!~Ry?r 4rT• ,2~"~.,.L}r~, ,!r +i a~ 7 n' w 0~ vs i ,Qr t f: V 9 WW. v N~ A f 3~Jn r '1.sp, W 1 •t dK. ".,~y+~JUJ RR V• 7'~D;•A ~ N~'L ,+t .K: f,' ,r; ` 1 - ~:..1~+. 9 ~ r • 1 . } .i s y 2 ~ D 1 j ye~ A r, `y. . > 1 ~ 7 ~)in• : ~y,~ ( ~ Y ~ W N " N yl C D `A,t V~ .r w ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ Hl/)OS'.` N% 1 ti~ 1~ ,,:n it ; 5 ~ ~t ~ CD' , ~ y, sr; r' ~ l ~ SC~D~ i 1 ~ • ~~,x.: 3 r ~M ~ .).R; `i11~t 1~"t7y ~t ~ 1~ FERR •1' p~ Fug yw >'ti ~ ~ I~ }~D' "r""' ~ rc•c ~VYx ~ JI,' ~.J~ r~~.~j`S.r'• k, . '..r'+Y• •.A' ~ +x - _ '~i b w N , '~:.:.•1I •,,'Y>~ yr' r ~ J" ^ v I ~~,.i l - .I - u'+ r.i o ~ ~ . ,.e~j Y~ 41 , t ~ rib. f:' N'. Itl ;.~~~~~'!;p?~• .4w; v~ ~L~~;. M• t rF~ 3a4': i'~`..G°, as. k j~'.' (n :.W Q7''µ, ~~:~r. L.~ ♦ 4 •C tt tin ` 7` . a *"k •fl. Y a rG! t . ~ " Ri A ` .l ar fi w~ 1F+•ry c+ r V%. r`k.~r ,n. ••I '1S~ ••f'y,~•:4 ~l S.' l t, ti ~ N{~ ~ r~ qY~' l r 1 F'~ ~ ~ r •~C-•:a' b r. 'j~+. .9 ..;n ) rt•; . y.~...,• ! - cn \.t N*~fi` ..r, ~'^s'".~:~ 3 ~ ' •.`;,r r ~ r•.~• ♦ - r ~ ~t ` : , }•'i• ~ tkr_..~i „~.,r' n Y uw J~a i ~ 1' ii:' s''~:. 4 1 +e a~. i~=y ~ A6af•.' ~ 4.,~. .:~°^)y.st, TiT'~ *,t .~~'-f"~'~""~it 1s,~!'~W; ~1 t~``=~._..,::`t .:f• ~ ~~i~' _a"~.,~^. r,'.3 :~~'"+I~ 1 ii; 7.•~. Lb ~w`• V. ~'t_~ ~1.. Jr''~ i l - !u, .v r V a l ...,l.br'~~ :•r d_' •Y r . ~ .~,07 nw ~ ~ 1 r { ~ : % ~jO ; .Y~,W `^7 N • N ~ r ~ ~ ' ry ~ a ~ r .]I. t ~!1 dni n~ ~jwl W ' ' T.. a- ' I IU' . if ~ 'g t. ''JIf•N ; ti •'•-~+g ~ ~jm~'•$ ~1-. 1 ~3r j}t Ash} s•.~. i •'IV ~ ~i ` , ~ ) a 1 ~ jjt • e9~,d + `7'r• ~ l +m t ` "L ~ 'f _ w i~~y~ ,,,,,,~Xr~~p ~~~t~(7).~~t ..xf ~y'~~~ i ~y~j~ rtil•' .'Y t~ "l.:: ti~:;t .r.., 1. r~ r Ylt .N. .Z:y4~ •1:ij1,_,,"+tt~., _ ail r.y •r'• e~Yr•,'r r IYY~ 1`~`. •ry ui,7g T ~ .•d % ~ > ~ 't rte' iL• ~ vy~D~tt! It~r~-L~; } r_`rr%'M^ 4 •Y ..4,;L. uv `if I (r N• .p Y•.v4J n, t'L IQY'/ D ! i•, 1..' r r h • " :J.A ~F('. •l,Yi t." =1 j(~ Ny > mc? ai+ i. _ r w •k.e r~7°9 .ti "'^rM~~ y }tr't,< °r 'y r - r 1. . r It p{~ v ~ N `7 , w ' ~..-...1 1 x~ ~ r:..~, f Ow r y#• A„.~' %e ^ f )b ( ( 1C I •w a i. , V 41 r,-L7~y1~jj~N1 ' + }y 1 ro 1. _r •t'~'+ t 'V '•'4.) S f•r f, N t 2i'Y ' ..'I S.E'- y ~ ~ ` , N ,~a. ,4 tit: 4t.+.¢til D ~(.O.i'.o9 {"'Z°,~._ _•i ~tR~µ~~ s!Y ~t~,: it r.r ~vr L~ ~ > ; •7 . ~ • - f + ,L . ' ,vim: - v ~ ~l r t 1 t~ A.r A i. IY `1 d~ u 1Y Vii: ".w ld 2`U ~ ~ -W;>S'~T• `l~ ~ ~ '•D A ~ t.v I vi ~•`tn~'h.e' '"Y"'.: ~ .ar£ °i•'?~~~%~~ 't i~ .ps,~i. rri~~• r'P' ~`;E":• t - F r; _7 7 4 ;N r "'~}i. •N I ••s~ '"t-^~` ~ •Y, , ~ yam'., ~T7~~}7 ..d2t, c t d 1 t l .S `l a I i . r.. ~ .L yl9i' L i. ' 4~- • ;yi'.. 'y,Y~ eY .1. ` M ♦ ♦ 'vt N..; . ~~'SI" . X.'Ii_., ry'e' - 'J V~r rel.' .~1 r..• r i i!•r~' I " i' ~I^ .'..Yi ••i'r~" W 11,~.~. ' . , / ~v ;}i~(i✓. t~ . ~ rxy,' , x A . ,,~til~+~ `t.1 . w .D .il of „s .'tAi , .~~r" •'r 7 - :n . W L - °~1~4'?("t`s, ~ :v>,'S..1 ,~""y~~'~' ~ i •.u In)(~ I I : I (Joins inset A, sheet 1 2) f~ n 'I.lll)ll. lout Will tu:hs lr+seJ ill slide Yuorllul;llc av+l ado 1 anA rllvl iluu .ulllrl. II alluwo roc avv-.llun is lv VusllluocJ l llls IudU W+3 Cnm Vilyd Vu 19IJ Il $ UaV al llnl nl ul IIIC luleunl. (iculn6l~nl lulvcY urlllupllu to KraVM1Y, LY IlIr. II Ilruul tul-1 of Aklll:ulll,- lull l:an>¢rvJIIWI :i L•rvlt'C Allll f.IluUCr+(Itl l( eq.'ul I.•S • li is f i 120 SOIL SURVEY TABLE 13.-Soil and [Absence of an ent ry indicates the feature is not :a concern. See Glossary for descriptions of such Hydro- Flooding Soil name and logic map symbol group Frequency Duration Months Aloha: I C None Amity: 2 None Astoria: 3_, 3F Briedwell: 48, 58. 5C, 5D B None Carlton: 68, 6C - B None Cascade: 76, 7C, 7D, 7E, 7F C None Chehalem : 8C C None Chehalis: 9, 10 B Common Brief Nov-Mar Cornelius: ' 116, ' IIC, ' II D, ' IIE,' IIF: Cornelius part C None Kinton part C None Cornelius Variant: 12A, 123, 12C None Cove: 13, 14 D Common -Brief Dec-Apr Dayton: 15 D None Delena: 16C D one Goble: 176.17C,17D,17E.18E,18F C None Helvetia: 198. 19C. 19D, 19E C None Hembre: 20E, 20F, 20G B None Hillsboro: 21A, 218. 21C, 21D B None Huberly: 22 D None Jory: 236, 23C, 23D, 23E, 23F C None Kilchis: '24G: Kilchis part C None Klickitat part B None _ a s CD a;a ~ CD v, ~ "t y =VW o.ao n a CL 0 fl n TABLE 3.19 CURVE NUMBERS FOR ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION II H N Hydrologic soil group Hydrologic Use Cover Type Treatment Condition A B C D Urban Fully developed Open space (lawns, parks) Pour (cover <500/c.) 68 79 86 89 Fair 49 69 79` 84 Good (grass cover >75%) 39 61 74 80 Impervious areas (paved parking, roofs, driveways, paved roads) 98 98 98 98 Dirt roads 72 82 87 89 Urban districts Commercial and business 89 92 94 95 Industrial. 81 88 91 93 Developing areas 77 86 91 94 Cultivated Fallow Bare soil 77 86 91 94 agriculture Row crops Straight row Poor 72 81 88 91 lands Straight row Good 67 78 85 89 Contoured Poor 70 79 84 88 Contoured Good 65 75 82 86 Contoured and (e raced Pour 66 74 80 82 Contoured and terraCCd Good 62 71 78 81 Small grain Straight row Pour 65 76 84 88 Straight row Good 63 75 83 87 Contoured Poor 63 74 82 85 Contoured Good 61 73 81 84 Contoured and tcrraccd Poor 61 72 79 82 Contoured and terraced Good 59 70 78 81 Close-seeded Straight row Poor 66 77 85 89 legumes Straight row Good 58 72 81 85 or Cunuwred Poor 64 75 83 85 rotation Contoured Good 55 69 78 83 meadow Contoured and terraced Pour 63 73 80 83 Contoured and terraced Gaud 51 67 76 80 r O r 5'S5 • 0 PHASE I-HYDROGRAPHS FOR POST DEVELOPMENT VS PREDEVELOPMENT (EXISTING BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENT) S.C.S. TYPE-IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INC.HES) 2,24,2.5 S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM 2.50" TOTAL PRECIP. ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO .64,80,0.12,98,27 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .8 .6 80.0 .1 98.0 27.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .13 7.83 3041 ENTER [d:I[path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: cn2prestanthonys S.C.S. TYPEAA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(E' ICHES) 2,24,2.5 S:C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM 2.50" TOTAL PRECIP. ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPE]ZV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.26, 80, 0.50, 98, 5 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .8 .3 80.0 .5 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 37 7.67 4960 cn2poststanthonys S.C.S. TYPE-IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 5, 24, 3.10 S.C.S. TYPEAA DISTRIBUTION 5-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM 3.10". TOTAL PRECIP. ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.64, 80, 0.12, 98, 27 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MF4UTES) A CN A CN .8 .6 80.0 .1 98.0 27.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .20 7.83 4304 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: cn5prestanthonys S.C.S. TYPE-IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 5,24,3.10 S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION 5-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM 3.10" 'T'OTAL PRECIP. - ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.26, 80, 0.50, 98, 5 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .8 .3 80.0 .5 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 48 ! 7.67 6456 ENTER [d:] [path] filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: cn5poststanthonys S.C.S. TYPE-IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PR.ECIP(INCHES) 10, 24, 3.45 S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM 3.45" TOTAL PRECIP. _ ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.64, 80, 0.12, 98, 27 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .8 .6 80.0 .l 98.0 27.0 PE AK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) _.24 7.83 5083 ENTER [d:] [path] filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: cnl 0prestanthonys S.C.S. TYPE-IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 10, 24, 3.45 S.C.S. TYPEAA DISTRIBUTION 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM 3.45" TOTAL PRECIP. ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(iMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.26, 80, 0.50, 98, 5 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .8 .3 80:0 .5 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .55 7.67 7345 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: cnl0poststanthonys • • S.C.S. TYPE-IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 25, 24, 3.90 S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION'"******************* 25-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM 3.90" TOTAL PRECIP. ---------------------------------------------------7------------------ ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.64, 80, 0.12, 98, 27 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS A CN A CN .8 .6 80.0 .1 98.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) .30 . 7.83 6116 IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) 27.0 VOL(CU-FT) ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: cn25prestanthonys S.C.S. TYPEAA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 25, 24, 3.90 S.C.S. TYPEAA DISTRIBUTION 25-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM 3.90" TOTAL PRECIP. ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.26, 80, 0.50, 98, 5 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MTNUTES) A CN A CN .8 .3 80.0 .5 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) L64 7.67 8501 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: cn25poststanthonys 0 S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 50, 24, 4.20 S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION 50-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM 4.20" TOTAL PRECIP. ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.64, 80, 0.12, 98, 27 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS A CN A CN .8 .6 80.0 .1 98.0 PEAK-.Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) .34 7.83 6821 IMPERVIOUS TC(MP UTES) 27.0 VOL(CU-FT) ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: cn50prestanthonys S.C.S. TYPE-IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 50, 24, 4.20 S.C.S. TYPEAA DISTRIBUTION 50-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM 4.20" TOTAL PRECIP. ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.26, 80, 0.50, 98, 5 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN u .8 .3 80.0 .5 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) i .70 7.67 9279 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: • cn50poststanthonys S.C.S. TYPE-1 A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 100, 24, 4.50 S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM 4.50" TOTAL PRECIP. . ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV),, TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.64, 80, 0.12, 98, 27 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .8 .6 80.0 .1 98.0 27.0 PEAK-_Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 38 7.83 7538 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: cn I 00prestanthonys S.C.S. TYPE-IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 100, 24, 4.5 S.C.S. TYPEAA DISTRIBUTION 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM 4.50" TOTAL PRECIP. ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.26, 80, 0.50, 98, 5 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .8 .3 80.0 .5 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .76 ! 7.67 10062 cn100poststanthonys • 9 DETENTION USING 25 YEAR STORM FOR PRIMARY DESIGN STORM KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.21B I - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - MODIFIED SBUHYD 4 - ROUTE 5 - ROUTE2 6 - ADDHYD 7 - BASEFLOW 8-PLOTHYD 9-DATA 10 - RDFAC I I - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: 10 R/D FACILITY DESIGN ROUTINE SPECIFY TYPE OF R/D FACILITY: 1 - POND 4 - INFILTRATION POND 2 - TANK 5 - INFILTRATION TANK 3 - VAULT 6 - GRAVEL TRENCHIBED 2 ENTER: TANK DIAMETER (ft), EFFECTIVE STORAGE DEPTH (ft) 3,2 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] OF PRIMARY DESIGN INFLOW HYDROGRAPH: cn25poststanthonys PRIMARY DESIGN INFLOW PEAK = .64 CFS ENTER PRIMARY DESIGN RELEASE RATE(cfs): 0.30 ENTER NUMBER OF INFLOW HYDROGRAPHS TO BE TESTED FOR PERFORMANCE (5 MAXIM'UM): 5 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 1: cn2poststanthonys ENTER TARGET RELEASE RATE(cfs): 0.13 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAP.H 2: cn5poststanthonys ENTER TARGET RELEASE RATE(cfs): 0.20 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 3: cnl0poststanthonys ENTER TARGET RELEASE RATE(cfs): 0.24 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 4: cn50poststanthonys ENTER TARGET RELEASE RATE(cfs): 0.34 ENTER [d:] [path] filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 5: cn100poststanthonys ENTER TARGET RELEASE RATE(cfs): 0.38 0 ENTER: NUMBER OF ORIFICES, RISER-HEAD(ft), RISER-DIAMETER(in) 1,2,12 RISER OVERFLOW DEPTH FOR PRIMARY PEAK INFLOW = .16 FT SPECIFY ITERATION DISPLAY: Y - YES, N - NO y SPECIFY: R - REVIEW/REVISE INPUT, C - CONTINUE c INITIAL STORAGE VALUE FOR ITERATION PURPOSES: 3054 CU-FT SINGLE ORIFICE RESTRICTOR: DIA= 2.80" ITERATION COMPUTATION BEGINS... • • TRIAL TANK-LENGTH STOR-AVAIL STOR-USED PK-STAGE PK- OUTFL OW 1 610.1 3054 919 .73 .18 2 396.9 1986 891 .79 .19 3 287.5 1439 841 .99 .21 4 227.7 1140 802 1.21 .23 5 194.0 971 773 1.39 .25 6 174.2 872 751 1.54 .26 7 162.2 812 736 1.65 .27 8 154.7 774 724 1.74 .28 9 149.7 749 717 1.79 .28 10 146.5 733 710 1.85' .29 11 144.2 721 705 1.89 .29 12 142.6 713 703 1.93 .29 13 141.5 708 701 1.95 .30 14 140.8 704 700 1.97 .30 15 140.4 702 699 1.98 .30 16 140.1 701 699 1.99 .30 17 139.9 700 698 1.99 .30 18 139.7 699 698 1.99 .30 19 139.7 699 698 2.00 .30 PERFORMANCE: INFLOW STAGE STORAGE TARGET-OUTFLOW ACTUAL-OUTFLOW PK- DESIGN HYD: .64 .30 TEST HYD 1: .37 .13 TEST HYD 2: .48 .20 TEST HYD 3: .55 .24 TEST HYD 4: .70 .34 TEST HYD 5: .76 .38 .30 2.00 698 .18 .75 250 .22 1.06 430 .25 1.37 540 .67 2.11 690 .60 2.09 690 SPECIFY: D - DOCUMENT, R - REVISE, A - ADJUST ORIF, E - ENLARGE, S - STOP d PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET-OUTFLOW ACTUAL-OUTFLOW PK- STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: .64 .30 .30 2.00 698 TEST HYD 1: .37 .13 .18 .75 250 TEST HYD 2: .48 .20 .22 1.06 430 TEST HYD 3: .55 .24 .25 1.37 540 TEST HYD 4: .70 .34 .67 2.11 690 TEST HYD 5: .76 .38 .60 2.09 690 STRUCTURE DATA: R/D TANK (FLAT GRADE) RISER-HEAD . TANK-DIAM STOR-DEPTH TANK-LENGTH STORAGE- VOLUME 2.00 FT 3.00 FT 2.00 FT 139.7 FT 698 CU-FT SINGLE ORIFICE RESTRICTOR: DIA= 2.80" ROUTING DATA: STAGE(FT) DISCHARGE(CFS) STORAGE(CU-FT) P)RM-AREA(SQ-FT) .00 .00 .0 .0 .20 .09 .0 .0 .40 .13 .0 .0 .60 .16 .0 .0 .80 .19 330.4 .0 1.00 .21 411.1 .0 , 1.20 .23 487.8 .0 1.40 .25 558.6 .0 1.60 .27 620.9 .0 1.80 .28 670.9 .0 2.00 .30 699.1 .0 2.10 .62 699.1 .0 2.20 1.19 699.1 .0 2.30 1.92 699.1 .0 2.40 2.72 699.1 .0 2.50 3.01 699.1 .0 AVERAGE VERTICAL PERMEABILITY: .0 MINUTES/INCH SPECIFY: F - FILE, N - NEWJOB, P - PRINT IF/OF, R - REVISE, S - STOP CITY. OFTWARD Sor~Rb.oaC° Community Ome(opment PRE-APPLICATION. CONE ERENCE :NOTE S"A Better Community Pre . PPIication Meetm 'Notes arerValid for Six 6 Mobtfi$ NON-RESIDENTIAL {J r x APPLICANT:..', AGENT: T. Phone: m) 7).45 '11(~r`.. Phone: (sc PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: 19 TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): i -a Rte - NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: r \ PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Gj,,: r c rr.:: n r~•s i ~1,» r s. c \ . < ~,r~-.t~' + 3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: V 1 CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM (C.I.T.) AREA: ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Beier to Code Section 111. 'S10 I MINIMUM LOT SIZE: sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: ft. Max. building height: '3S ft. Setbacks Front ab ft. Side 16 ft. Rear a(-'~ ft. Corner : e' ft. from street. / MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: 'S 0 % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: 'aC' © NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting HandouO THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S), AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION, of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is • required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout: concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meetina is to be held orior to submittina vour application or the application will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section dNA.RRATIVE [Refer to Code Chapter 18.3901 The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. 40 [[IMPACT STUDY [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the e#t of the development on public facilities and services ress, at a minimum, the fainsportation sysfem, ~~Ing bikeways, the drain ag~, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of toe development on the public at large, public facilities svste.rns. and affected pr_ivaat -property usersTn situations wnere tF e;ommunl evelopmE:nt Code requires the dedica Ion Teal property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. I ~ O [ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18385) Minimum number of accesses: -,fin Minimum access width: lis Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18305.0301 WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES O THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercia institutio , and • industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required accE:ss and egress. Walkways s all provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. ❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter !1~7311111 STREETS: EEYARD the centerline of LOWER INTENSITY Zfeet, along the site's boundary. ➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SETBACK. ❑ SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.T30.0102J BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONSr - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that- ➢ A maximum building floor ea to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5.to 1 will exist; All actual building setbac s will be at least half (Y2)-of the building's height; and ➢ The structure will not a t a residential zoned district. BUFFERING AND SCREENING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7451 In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas mt.ist be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may o be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to vour proDosal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundaru_., feet along south boundary. fe ftl ~ oundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: ' J [LANDSCAPING [Refer to Code Chapters 18.145,18165 and 183051 STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced :20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations / affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised b planters. E~/RECYCLING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.1551 Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such " as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within 47 Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. PARKING [Refer to Code Section 18.165.0401 t f 1 REQUIRED parking for this type of use: ♦ Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): i SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches 18 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches)( 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: ➢ All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface ,end an appropriate sign shall be posted. ➢ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.165.0801 Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section 2/BICYCLE RACKS [Refer to Coatection 183651 • BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ❑ SENSITIVE LANDS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7151 % The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR NDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREA ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON 3v UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will att mpt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- conference based on av ilable information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identifv sensitive land areas. and heir boundaries. is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meetina the definitions of sensitise lands must be clearly indicated on Dlans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provide regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEV OPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. ❑ STEEP SLOPES [Refer to Code Section 18.715.084.C1 When STEEP SLOPES exist, p/Sbe issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the al standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.0. The reporbased upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations hieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. CLEANWATER SERVICES [CWSI BUFFER STANDARDS [Refer to R & 0 96-44/USA Regulations -Chapter 31 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the vi/ater quality functioning of the sensitive • area. Desian Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on tl-ie sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAURESOLUTION & ORDER 96-44 -r: '`pt t ~+N ¢~.~'r 4 . i ri{ ::a S a,"d~''i.. ~ t i a ✓.,.+-F°k ~§'a W ; SLOPErADJA(.ENT ` WIDTH OF VEGETATED ENSITIVE'AREA DEFINITION r . tisa a' s 'S CORRIDOR`PER wY 4 x ;SIDE >.,t . :z Y..A. TO SENSITIVE ,AREAS 3 _ n , ♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining: 0 10 to < 50 acres 0 > 50 to < 100 acres <25% 15 feet 25 feet ♦ Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre ♦ Existing or created wetlands > 0.5 acre ♦ Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres ♦ Natural lakes and ponds ♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining: # 10 to < 50 acres 1 > 50 to < 100 acres ♦ Existing or created wetlands ♦ Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow ♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining > 100 acres ♦ Natural lakes and ponds 25 feet <25% 50 feet >25% 30 feet 50 feet > 25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure in 25-foot increments from the starting point to the top of ravine (break in <25% slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine' `Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds, whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor, shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet, if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section Restrictions in the VegetaTe Corridor: J NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service 1 Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 183801 SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of 4 ' Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or ` height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Referto Code Section 18390.02;0.C.) A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all Existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of tries required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: 0 Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation Q. program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no ® mitigation; ➢ Identification of-all trees which are proposed to be removed; and A~ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to Q' protect trees during and after construction. klS-TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (11 YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. MITIGATION (Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.EJ REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: j ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ` ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably avai )able on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: 0 The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property Dr, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. [v~CLEAR VISION AREA [Refer to Code Chapter 183951 The Ci requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND % EIGHT~8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. ❑ WATER RESOURCES OVERIAY DISTRICT [Refer to Code Section 18.191.0301 The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT impleme is the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between evelopment and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identi-Fi d in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonabl economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect signs cant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and a ance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize strea(nbank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreat4onal and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" pr visions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions require that " ignificant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. / Maior Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARRP STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1,0P00 cubic feet per sE!cond (cfs). ➢ Major streams in Tigard include 17ANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY' REEKS) AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEAR G STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard incl de Summer Creek, Deny Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short 0ibutaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF- is greater. The riparian set 090(1)(d). CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes NON-Residential Aoofication/Plannina Division section HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR 3AAKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever r k is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- Page 6 of 9 • 4! ➢ The standard .TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IIS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (inclucling adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Cleanwater Services (CWS) standards adopted and administered by thE: City of Tigard. ❑ RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTIONS (Refer to Code Section 18397 The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC EDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY S MUCH A"') 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibi ed by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources i ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved ortions of the riparian setback area. Eliaibilitv for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Are S. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBA K REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially dist bed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the V getation Study required by Section 18.797.100 that demonstrates all of the following: ➢ Native plant species currently cov r less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; ➢ The tree canopy currently cove less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed f m the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; ➢ That vegetation was not rem ed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.797.100 regulating removal of native plant spec s; ➢ That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and ➢ The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. ❑ ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.060) MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless t is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must ha a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL parcel is less than 1 Y2 times the min )T EXCEED 2Y2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the m lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS 18.330 (Conditional Use) 18.340 (Directors interpretation) 18.350 (Planned Development) -i/ 18.360 (Site Development Review) 18.370 (Variances/Adjustments) 18.380 (Zoning Maprrext Amendments) 18.385 (Miscellaneous Permits) 18.390 (Decision Maldng Prooeduresllmpact Study) 18.410 (Lot Line Adjustments) 18.420 (Land Partitions) 8.430 (Subdivisions) 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts) 18.520 (Commercial Zoning Districts) 18.530 (Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.620 (Tigard Triangle Design Standards) 18.630 (Washington Square Regional Center) 18.705 (Access/Egress/Circulation) 18.710 (Accessory Residential Units) 18.715 (Density Computations') 18.720 (Design Compabbitrty Standards) 18.725 (Environmental Performance Standards) 18.730 (Exceptions To Development standards) 18.740 (Historic overlay) 18.742 (Home Occupation Permits) 18.745 (Landscaping & Screening Standards) / 18.750 (Manufactureditbl Home Regulations) ✓ 18.755 (Mixed Solid WastelRecyding Storage) 18.760 (Nonconforming Situations) 18.765 (Off-Street PaddnglLoadng Requirements) 18.775 (Sensitive Lands Review) ~L 18.780 (Signs) 18.785 (Temporary Use Permits) _iL"_ 18.790 (free Removal) 18.795 (visual Clearance Areas) - 18.797 (Water Resources (WR) Overlay District) 8.798 (Wireless Communication Facilities) 18.810 (Street & Utility Improvement Standards) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 9 NON•Residenbal Applicat mPlannina Division Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: /1 c_.` J ~i )K.~~~, lY lS ,1..~(-~ l)~_I ,V SI i IYt^Vr~ '~'7 ~~i~• ~:~1~~~:'~. ~J l~.J~l'., lU l ~ ~ ~f-1 (x~ 1 I t,1iZ W1 f1C F-ri r, ^r ,^,nl'n-~G \C7Jt' ri~f: r~r• P.~ J U' ~1. 1-Y~-'1 l'.~7('':~ ~ i~~ l:L, r.1~ ~(.:o. Y . r.c- C~l,n~~l~,^~7C y ~ ~ U 1r?~F~ -"r~,n.~ t„~=~P ~r✓.r~'P.r~,~ nc~,,.r,rti.!!~~ r~n~:~ ~,c- Cf'i"•,c~,(~'P:~v~ f1Pn,,~;'vnl v PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planninq counter closes at 4:00 PM. Mans submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1). 81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 W)HAo iAanfial AnnliralinnlPlanninn nivkinn Carfinn • The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued sE:ven (7) days prior to the public hearing A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard C' ; 4 e _ 0*7i6-.ca . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the Cihf's oolicv is to apply those system development credits to the first building hermit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conterence and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related-to- site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required b the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended tha~ a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE . REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY. i~ r~ u CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 E-MAIL (stafrs first navel @ cl.tlgarti.orms TITLE 18 (CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (ODE) INTERNETAIDDRESS: www.ci.dgard.or.us HApattylmasters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 1-Nov-2001 (Engineering section: preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NON•Residental MolicationlPlannina Division Section • CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in coniunction with the notes provided to you at the are-application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, 1503.639.4171. /r Staff: Date: / f o I BASIC INFORMATION Please refer to the "Land use applications basic submittal requirements" checklist for the basic submittal requirements. 2. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: © Arborist_Repo_rt/Tree Assessment j ❑ -trrar trreets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Geotechnical Report must address liquefaction potential and soil bearing capacity ❑ Other 3. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/20') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible thE! City prefers the use 'of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 8Y2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (if the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable a indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map - y1elf j~ Showing the location of the site in relation to: Adjacent properties ❑ Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 4 h:\patty\masters\checklist.doc (UPDATED: 26-Jun-02) • 41 Existing Conditions Map ~*WVC~K < 44, Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5' for slopes >10%) Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24" of the surface for three or more weeks of the year Slopes in excess of 25% Unstable ground • Areas with severe soil erosion potential • Areas having severely weak foundation soils Locations of resource areas including: I • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan Wetlands Other site features: • Rock outcroppings • Trees with 6" caliper measured 4' from ground level Location and type of noise sources Locations of existing structures and their uses Locations of existing utilities and easements Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways Locations of driveways on adjacent properties and across the street Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer (as applicable) Scale, north arrow and date Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10% grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) Watercourses • Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions (if any) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands and marsh areas The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions, and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 4 h:\patty\masters\checklist.doc (UPDATED: 26-Jun-02) 0 41 Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for slopes 0-10% or 5' for slopes >10%) ❑ Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25' of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4' above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing. existing and potential street connections ❑ Site DevelQ,pment-P-tag. The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: + Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ + Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ + Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ + Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: ♦ Entrances and exits on the site ❑ Parking and circulation areas ❑ ♦ Loading and service areas ❑ ♦ Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ ♦ Outdoor common areas ❑ C~ Above ground utilities ❑ ❑ + Trash and recyclable material areas The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: ♦ Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25' of the site ❑ ♦ Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ + Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ ♦ Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ ♦ Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s) of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: ♦ All areas to be landscaped ❑ + Mailboxes ❑ ♦ Structures and their orientation ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 4 h:lpattyVnasterslchecklist_doc (UPDATED: 26-Jun-02) 0 ,o Landscape Plan Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ . > Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ iK~ ~ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ 4 Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a P reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ Grading/Erosion Control Plan iK The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ ` Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades, and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and meter sizes ❑ Fire hydrants (existing and proposed) ❑ Proposed fire protection system Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ T oration, width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ ~ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines El i7=Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility El Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 4 h:\patty\masters\checklist_doc (UPDATED: 26-Jun-02) PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax WON]: Tax LOS): Use Type: t2ird - A, 01 City of Tlgant Oregon Community Development Shaping A Better Community 2S12BD 100 St Anthonys The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a proiection of public iimprovement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Riaht-of-wav dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. ,Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: SW McKenzie Street/Grant Avenue to 25 feet corner radius. 1Z'4 T~ha'r~ ® SW Grant/Johnson to 30 feet corner radius. ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet Oa- a ~a_ Ott eet III IUr UVef [let L ® 1/2 street improvements will be necessary along SW McKenzie Street, to include: _',Z 1.6 feet-of-o-avement-fromc6-nferline-ta curb conertte-Eurb,- r storm sewers and-et er rgrr~c, ~7~~1 CSpp Q~a-tl ~rec,> ~ /5-fitr►ere's7devval e tr ® street trees spaced per TDC standards. ® street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department section ❑ Other: 1-1 1-1 street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two--year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk to include: CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section ❑ street trees 41 ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: (1.) (2.) Overhead Utilitv Lines: ® Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. f There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW McKenzie Street. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitarv Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located in Grant Avenue. McKenzie Street and Johnson Street. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to extend the public lines as necessary to provide adequate service to the expansion. Water Suter: The Citv of Tigard (Phone:(503) 639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 612-7010] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for CITY OFTIGHO Pre Plication Conference Notes page 3 01 6 Engineering Department Section information regarding the quacy of circulation systems, thdlneed for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire profs'Ction. I Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, :and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Onsite detention will be required if the new impervious area exceeds 5,000 sf. Storm Water Qualitv: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus ti contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new a( impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the 1 development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ® Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ❑ Payment of the fee in-lieu. Onsite facility is required if the new impervious area exceeds 1, 000 sf. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. 1) Submit a traffic impact report. Staff recommends a report be submitted that addresses all of the planned phases so that we car! see the impacts per phase. Then, certain offsite improvements (if required) can be properly assessed to the appropriate phase. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Seetion the number of trips which rojected to result from the propo development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proed use of the land, the size of the pltfject, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible onr when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. Pay TIF.. PERMITS Public Facilitv Improvement (PFI) Permit: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer AgreemE.,nt, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows: NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required, the applicant must ohtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Buildina Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by th(~ Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. _ Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section Master Permit (MST his permit is issued for all single a ulti-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for *ding construction, including sub-trWs (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineerirg Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepaired by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY. ' ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT STAFF DATE Phone: 15031639-4111 Fax: 15031624-0752 i:%englbrianrltemptateslpreap notes - eng.dot Revised: March 21, 2002 CITY OF TIURD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section ~ h IN T""r MAP: R ~,V • II I 0 ~ opli. I• 'ntt -u -#;t 'wj_: t t t~ ;.Tmn Hill opt =r - It i opt up IN R Bpi lip -17 R R a 9. e s s ! ! fili !!f~I~ ~;~tq i `I. -I~ i ~E~ ! ! I~ t1L S1!t t 8 o 't 'J ANILOM MOISAN ® ;4' J rix,r I CC ~LL ;r fxrl { r r`•fh..:r•:.-r•+.r._.1::i~: ,,..::a r: ..r.•i t Y ! -r -174, r,. ;'r v: ) ~ B~ _ . ~ L., _ - - - - - - J ..p•~-. _ _ - _ ......mot-. _ _ _ O IF ;-1,3t20 _ 13180 f4+ 40 >o ENTRANCE DRIVEWAY DETAIL ~Y; / scar: ,•.,v : -~~h'' % ~ mum \i"r.:'.: _ _ _ = ` YI3 41)'E MIr OMEC101: ti R6• 1 '•.'`i•\~:, - NTYO♦c Axo woom NUCr Txo ' • O~.p` ' e• - - T . TO PROar smnus u xccmw,r ~sy `b/ TO wrova wv, m,`oo ws, wn am GRAPHIC SCALE < <!//J7~<♦,••'' / RAMP D- AIL I m SCAR: P.1O' NOTE: 1 caxTNACrw sTAA O MILLTo rmrrr a IN eAOVIu i LEGEND: ar rL uomwwm o u,rio w,a TO o a CM wrxuxa oas,mcr,a I ANO mu,A ovrTACr • ML mnmr lw n-xaws .y.._ n am woo, TR ICR To CPMORINO aorT0. TO OCTpO,IN[ PoTrI,I VA nsORllYS ~ I cur rcR soTrA¢ ATTENTION: I 4-' aNrauar aTEew SAN RFOU,RES - To ra.w R"a AORTm m I , _ +W~'... Y 4TNOAID IRAQ CdYl1RYC11OI Dl1PANR TW OBfOOM UTILITY NCnrICATICx ONrER. "'OM MAIL N2 sa IYT DIM loA, Ibflrx Ix OM •p1-Oe~-Up~o IMQIW OM 96?-00~-OOYG YW Wr ~t OBTAI. COPIES R TIEY R BY C 'W M CExIIX. (xOTG rNC IlL Ima~ICIAc RIrAN)R NlM®t roN THE U4CCM UTILITY NOt,riur,01 CpTES ,f Ig ,~-0m p. 1 - srAmm m no (saA a2-1TeT} `aV1~..,~I. j,..q UTILITY STATEMENT le.• wI loa<: w rB r.. !LT FOCI (~AEixf3 wiOViOm Ib~ M R9[W:T IIK Ur lll ~inCN IM iONCw~TIOH - I NOI-Op9 ..BU =11 IO IRUIIIO NR sNOw iPl / ■V sm 1Nes.fB, IY LT M OTTr + <1 CUTm wOtN HIM oIOYATION P4.Y xor oaYwrtm To BE COWLI Z M AOORATC IxsT- r0' a opICT Al OIlT rOR AsKACr 5¢ IR}r YOCAOCN HM (BY Po COT s e DIVES ,u smNY aa.s Aa ML NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Ian VOLL OF O04IM0 'REM PRELIMINARY Cl or sms AMC ,jJ5Ar'(rIIJA,rT-e-0M1 I.•r lYr AM6 / / l r'' 1 `~II ~ mrm m»m 1 Or Sm SRAM PAC ATIN OOO.% I. ~ 64 V r M/6) rCOMRCT m M SANITARY 11/ONSIDEV CRCN (11bNI~NT \ 7 ~r 1S•.b r srol9r DRAM we AsIN wmA L.ZS lr. sass LK c .ucr NEYSIolr ~RALL AT • VININW S FUT AMY FROM PROP (SE 192VOY RAm A ppRSllt lrHI K l1E . u - WAr yw :,x RAIOI SFRVIGtiJ TN LOCARpL snwa wn AKTEA IrV[ rM Sr uluTr m ~ k ~ CMflURaI W" POMIZ m VERIFY LO TIM 0 ALL k,VVIC tAm UTILITIES -M m mrN CMS7M -M 72-MM 1 PR VI E YYIIAn CONSISPUM SIC qqq d F _ , AW 9 µy D . O WTI" w ANY POTENTIAL WrLICTS g G d 1 V NA ATTENTION: CRECM u. KWIM mu m mim R=S AWT17) BY M 9R[mN UT ILPY NOIIrIUTIM COM. THOSE RliiS AIr SR r IN OM M2-WI-ODIO MNWN w SO?-OOI-- Ym INIY OBTAIN WOO W O`mW PLUS SY G INS M Q71TEn (NOM- M TniaW K NLUM PCR M ORLSM UTILITY NOTIrICATIM OENTER IS (503) 7}2-1964 UTILITY STATEMENT M MCO(OROVIO WILITIE9 SW4IO11 µ1E PER TIRO MARKINGS AW RE(MO MARINSS PROVIOW SY M AE9£CTIVC UTILITY AMMIM IACAIIM K NON-085ERVA9l[ AW/9N UN9ERMOMO Uf ILI110 ANE SHAH mq II9AOIAlIM atT AW APE Wf MIARANIEm M K CONPyIE m'ACe M O $ ®eL.aaa~sOlmll L M minAr:ly NINL'NM'I M nACr IBNIM O u wnm uxlrts Inmeer unumN m ABMw wm Q B ' y AvAw mlMAClu MAm 9ANAa ALOBmrm m t0al nANNwm AND ar M awMaclan LMOe< E ~U~1j 155^ U W LL Olmreoe AR m'PAY 0 aA4 rAV AF9 rAmPrf IA URIO o•Olwr Nom. SM S. fL2nMMP ur N o ravNS ar (arrlTq Iwlm onmlSR Nvm wom9 Cmaw ALMmn rffNl NN9c wo/9A q s rApw MAM y E B 8 E i lOrr •ar6r Ar Am eINL! 1.RUROO Ar wNnl• Are ndf tM ICMaNUI SRAmAU LI [AAnrt fglp w M Tarq D• • III[rbf IIN ONgwN•n O NR l lr I lPAAIf v _ _ q . / M tro l mv gwim . . Maw MAela sVU A•IrY M AAwI¢r AoaR rwR~m wM wml. `-NO AN P" u 0FLL P _ O S. M art u NO- w71m, mm m l Au wNAm m [NSSAI raw7Nw1 o PIAIICAA[s m AOSM RpLLN V 141 r0 a)vr.1C1Y1 NNl IS AoLAa• m ua NARNRU ar M aMaaern onMz r. 91 mla Nw a.a urw rNOro>m Mmu Av®1nNCllfvP No .nm s rar o iaYCnPO 91 a . NO) AN, IS •mmla .7awL Hwy u>m avALm m m Aa1NY0 mole 9 (oRMaM) AIO m O S. wPl alDl MN t'AM M AIL OnOI IllEr aA9 • (NAK NaRMN) •ALiriL NAY m III NN ONMAM 0 S,,SN,,w to NaaRAI RA}A9 m Aoa LPMAL'Im N r Ilrl9 Axanm nN rta NB A9Ra M Nrt m wM Mwr.. MNrll II nNRAA Nuu m nrL v Luw.i ami aaAMii .r~m91 wr4 ur Pma ,UT. ID~ raOI SAS Nm rv r .Wy t . / 11 M aMV.1Cla1 wm PR MIIVIYrt B m w om m alaoNAS ru m M M na II6wY°art~Ni~ a~ n°Tr41 m m10M°iccwN m uw m rr x za NOTES; AT IqN SAS AND OECTROM NPRACiMM ColmIACTCRS TO CDONMAIE mM µ9RMmA7E FNAMWSE U.- roll rom LOG Z (L N C G J a. 5 GRAPHIC SCALE (vrm) I r . m n Ir,19DNS I ~ I I i 1 1 ~ I I I j Igr wTE: w(71~ey I ~ fie m.al.m.6.n Yom- 1W?609 I - u•1 IoM: NAS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C2 PRELIMINARY C2a BwEm -RTY TO ~ r I I t •)ra 29~ o I U- D 1 j 1 S1elaT.nmg6MttLY:. '.I UIT, w gar sw.. a w .~a~n~_w ~.au r >u a ex u~ ~ ~~•omra >rnr t p > a. w w~"w ~.»P.omwe +aa. r fFr n .-ma^iwa ~a a K >.a aw !ea w R 14tseM»~e~iwta ~ ~N. ~ as w N-~ leae•Mf u . ~wYipgf Rw' Y ac 01- >m a ~ y.~.P ! P.. u ::n: TNPI w:utM ' z Iel»I Mr~lam L• 4.r nrd P ...won ~ r. rw•a n+r Ru+ eewr bP wwr»+. PeT Yer wYh..! » Ys. ,war». w~wY<, r Pmt Nw.o.~ a~.w~t Ne. bUh > F.Y.t r M N rnptlal ewaW_ ,Plw w.tw. ti `y i ` .MIQr Y,7! ~ rm~'e.w~aw•o.•n J Le-Auie:~ ° t•a / eanar ' oAex 1 a~icu .1• eau CUR" t-'...! It fIK6MUa>l ~r -rt M•er .Mbw r r rtrt aaw r ru •an..kr raurre. N ^VNw .Tw. w tiws.. M wY swe M M a~w tiru-sw rFr»~4b~ w ~ .a Y..w.~ea . ~r ° ~.w',"IF+..aY,. « w . » w wr[ . w •..wl ..rb a.. a. ~ N...l~a c rr:.. wm,aana y1wP re•rl .++er. N f 4» awes .rw r fww a. ,»ew Yw.Nw, r .wPUav"w.I +wu~»'- w wr+F a-.~a.+Y s +''a» a r: »Ni wr'•r--tF Ewa N •e>41p1• aa+ w vwf N r l.asr Aal•ar . r e.r'r fI1Y11Y1H llowwamin w pul r»r •.w F »»+uN Fw M waO,ra b wt Y .W ~ _ aea., P!!, eY w b ew-r ar w /M wr Y-, . r . wngtf Mw», Ya.►e awwF1 M Y ewr'a ~wM.~wn~wM1.w'e..~ eaarn~ r r 1 m.mw F.»rr. r r M»er r e' M ••nw» w yr..r w' ` • erh w w"-~i VV - /w1 .M•/a w+w r.w..n M wa .y.a a.wl ~ O»YSb M w• P •u b ne~/a ! ~ Yww,lr r ....Ia. b ~ rwr~wl « I,a• w.r •um nwwwusr.- •r .P wwlr «-.t.l r M +t.» f.r er.f nYr> ar. arn.. rrr w »wn M Fn ww. wrya.r w e+-a, r M u F yrM ww w+.»e nr w ,rwa r s.rr «Mwrw..a w » eba r.a•a w r~ r Rwi: ~rr~iwara-'~..Te.'N°.w-.~ r ,ww+.r...» MF Mwl~ ~ »wu n ~nw+~^bi . rir i ~ r w N ~aw4 ~4 m» w~Yw wR.a tr. u.r.twF nw 1i ti.lFb.«waw rbi»-~r»»w~~+~iw.~,w • t a+l 1~ to•wz 3+ lya•-M ImL01IIfJl0ld SS ' f]w•T. . fOO~ M: i i/ ------5w MCKENZIE STREET- a_ - nB~vrx~__ i 44 i l l l l l l l l l I o w ' IT wN.- w Ml- w.uTn N S f 5 IRtM FCR ea, a ToT f A wpP.3 r6lAR.D P61ARK11 =eAy - )-VM nW.Y.GHT C0.1fdC wwa taua aRfo c.+r,e • a r»a t.,.. a,l , sr..sa t....... o.Fn,. Y r or~ « a,s. ,Y N ,.e.r w r.rna .•r r • a,e , twe .....r rwl m rwr, wew N Iw.. 2.Ywr, lew».. vwYwtn, w r..t ,O~LLO I,b u~P~ ~ ar .~rM! ! ws-mi.-Y •w - ~ »r r Y.r.. ww n~wwv~ me ..a a .as Ya e,~ ayw r R l.aw r , ~ ~ ~ 1. uYw,w.w'r M,w~Vwata~w~ ^N IiF~ aa..w. wM1- In~.Mn-r-» Y wwna Y}a+arwt ..u r +b » air .te r .»»w •wr wAwlw Ip! b rl » rN1 twW» « rr. • a•! awn rrtm R.,r » a .n n». M M . rA n»ea a Y ra. r»4 wr N e•e• I01w®l f- M « rr~ w f~werf IY•e-'.' Yw.W (n-F.,) Yw ~ .w~. Ywl .r+»r w a~»».» ~.»K C feO •rro•U oo.lgf wNi w » ,alr •,:ra ..~w..°0amu..NO •w•• ~,w, „NI « wt r e.. rw .Y...... »rrr• » rnwl M» « ~ v.~iu~ W -»ara rw r+-.a YwY•f r wa...r anFw 4 wwwll r iwl aN. W .n Mwr N Ys.~ . aw» •.+a M. eC.w rww• M r» wY r4 ral, a.w „e r rw,a K a~a4 ~.aN.~a rVA ww M ~ M~a »w ~a.s~'~-'»e» war r rw maw M aM N ~ ea wb Y a~ral-IaF M w.na N a.y.F..ae.a , wi N~wYt~r, r ~r t Y,. f11AlIR r ,wu wr. r n + b. fNw w r a r i....I MY v.r Nr rw r.Yl ,ra wr w U-•r n. er « Nurw aemen~Me, Yw~ N M Yet » wa.e1 rd aY. rr. •-nr~ a.. s~.Y:'~+~i.rn ra. r « a•a w.l w an~+•.' w :.w-'-la I.i..f+~-r~• P Oa INlnO Yws Pwn» -M rw wa r.v»la! w w ~ arm iw~-in»,1 a~.w a»±Nf eu.-w>rr M• a-y w`w^nbM rw F. Pn F-~-wra•-uwr.t Mu »F r . aR., u.r Yo rla:...~. •u• R.w nn.a - r-I~rPrr- c'wri a--~ :w ~ ars~w»w yNwr w.w..w.~~ w~i.:w»eiw. w +aw~i Mma Mlb b.~wi r.Y (»~'.wYaNw ~ nw!-.ww.+w a.. a~iii. -I..~yrw.iM/m~i~l rrw.ta FAY 4a.r-a.w »Ir. err arar 4~rw aY~a ,P~ir~ M 4n~ M F ira.trwa N wFN wrYa »+N w0 w.r1 b~.Yw-. . ~r r~~wnwM aNa~ ~•+aN r 1.' w a r a- i.oao » n. aw »Pj w.e. ww ww..,»..az„ ~ r M w.»»a « r w...r r.1, Mr ae. wua wu .iri-w. ~MMar w .N +Mw .,~bi+. www-. t 4' - :l.'Yt O y a 1.1 Ll~ zw ' < r• u P { O 0 ~ V z w^ y C J~ y Op _x u u a~n1M ~it0 •tmyi [t ~ ylw'D a[a>Twftw [MYwll Ml nA uw a~n a mn n»[uwwam ,»'rta u :tl a i aenW P1{ -I ,n' sale! »l.W argf frn O EVTR(;REEN TREE STAKING I,ETAII, ~1 a sw, Lr (a p ewrolm) -r . r w+. sraxn is S rev,.. o. nnawwl m M r asw- If•sm anf[ ---r waw• rnt .amt rTP 0 , +a»vlnUlfa. n, L S(l amun[ a F +n >rfwrou \ oe;,w aroolfoc r• LANDSCAPE PLAN LIP M•I !>aw arzc 1 try' Pl» .fat ►ao•fl a.av nltluan ree } r ww C•S,Ne ,.tl1a0f O SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL y~ BBA W t V V, aos :u•w tlma 17ITo•[ 10 O DECIDUOUS TREE. PIANTING DETAII. U.01 ,or m swt PERMfT SET m . 0-luld ~~~Ni AVENUE _ a • - I 3 ~ ~ - ~ZZ I x ~ O 6 /r. C pl :i 1 \ E : ~ :z l XU PACIFIC 141G14lu,4Y I 9su"~ --J ~ ~ At ~ 1 1 a~ a s s pp 1 ~ + s ~ t 0 a Pill: 11111i la is -1~31 e. ANYROM MOISAN A i a GAIL & OE ARSE= e Abj OCI AICATtlC l o lov., ® may( ! R k~ e. QL MON SITE~rLAN r•rr GENEFAL NOTES KE7NOTE8 pQ o.ew... Lwra.. Q WMWartiw o Q a~awwl.~a«~ Qs e.laora,rw.+ O .OgOM.IMNY IMr MrI/~ O ~MAq MrMI LEGEND ~ ~+ursw•r~llawr.w~ OO a1.oR orr~r/orr.a "%C.4 WA 8'ET ~74'STd.a, i I i 1 i i i I EIi DAI! W/M I iL roe mn $a AM 0 g~ R f Z ~ I&T 1'T eimm J 3 I:i-- ~ EXITS , r ' •\e \ ',IR'y~:.'Y.~i~ ~tl~ IRXIBT „r. 5W MCKENZIE FREE -11A l onnML- I" A14 KEYNOTES 0:~~'ir sir ©M~ IMy ®~1•~~w1MT~wL Om L wwra.M m ®r w sQ~~~~w~rrw.~~a ®rw~~ew~rwn GENERAL NOTES =am rws~ LEGEND ED M-0 YOIU~~ 1~lMw i ~..ow ED CIMMM u Y 1 V ~ r CV= ! r ~ o r 1 O < ~ O u Z ~ ! _i , , , r `ern wxei AU G 0 Peoml-IEL J a /1]c}e~ ~ Da YhAw..4'fun.*.A.!is 1i~~YCryy\.:.yf.:/h'd....+.yq•!:d{M}'1✓.u.y - ~O .lll i I 4.........:~.: - -o s_ 9 is y OUZO 1 ELMA7M WALL 6E DOLE SCHCXX ----8 ----o ---o ~O®OOO©OOOOO ■ tsL ANKROM MOISAN ® Aff OCIAT60 AICHITRCTf i i r ~ J `s Z I~ ~r --G i a ~E D Z -I I I a + + ~ i 1.4 D 6 L i i i i r.r r -r L t Z i I I n` I I ~ i I i a 4 --o ®®®©®®®8®®6000®000000000 lot S° 61LOr1A9 BEYAl10r1~ A N R R O M M O (5 A N® %SSOCIATgD A&CHITICTS ; vi Y J - --5Wj0I-j.NWN STREET LOT ! EXISTING \ I 9~ I I^ P~ ' ~ yrl Ek16TING ELEMENTARY 9GHOOL I I ~1 I 1 I ~o~.m. J Phase 1 B - r CENTER 1 D J ® 'MODULAR , 3 / .I r EXIST EXIST ,mss t, TW -..PAD • ~ C ai r~ ~ rm••m• j+l ~ . i - - - - SW MCKENZIE S-I@EET- WAY - - - Timm l~ I I I U !f IIIIIIIIIIIII LOT I PAIaC1NG ICI I 111 ' LLLij I I ICI 11 Phase 1 A St. Anthony's School & Church PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT ) \1 / ~ v - _ ~ ~a - - - - --SWJOkN ON STREET - ' L ; q I OT 9 (E) EXISTI G I PArdCttYa I 1 ~ m EXIOTIW. I' - 1 ~ .I I i / ` ELEMEMARY 9CNOOL - 0 I ~ ~ I'' I QI Phase 1 B z 'b l I! I 1 1 U ~ / ~ I I I I E104CK'-t j ILl III / ) CENTER ut., LY-1 RELOCATED / - R3 83 U (E) - MODULAR , I (E) 1 1 (E . ( (E) ) (E)> - CHURC ADJACEM / (N) . (N)r T .,N_. PAD - I X, T I ' E) sri 1 S; - - - - SW MCKENZIE 57-1 REET- <-.011M uar I - = I i l l l l l l l l l l l j Phase 1 A I P` St. Anthony's School & Church (N) NEW METAL HALIED LIGHTING PLAN (E) EXIST. HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM TO REMAIN E R< N C-, .~2~. 233 RO' O1 + i NE DWI _ 4 iwE`'iT i u ?50-) T 0 T 7 w T 0 • 4._ L~ i zl u,.. . 1: N it i\ ~.r-ml l L-Li TC:w r~ S!r m CEL St. Anthony's School & Church EAST PARKING LOT - EXIST. - 0 0 AGENDA ITEM NO. d~•~ 0 • COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503)684.0360 Legal BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Notice TT- 101 t3 J_ Legal Notice Advertising *City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice 13125 SW Hall Blvd. OTi ga.r_ d , O.r_ e gon 9 7 2 2 3 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit Recounts Payable AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) I K,3thv Snvr3Pr being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of tWiaard-Tualatin T- rmes a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at `P i an rcl in the aforesaid county and state; that the Public Hearing/ SDR2002-00017,Cash & Carrv Stores a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and consecutive in the following issues: January 30,2003 ~1~KA Subscribed and sworn to for me thip 3 0 to day of January, 2 0 0 3 OFFICIAL SEAL ROBIN A BURGESS No Public for Oregon NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My Commission Expires: COMMISSION NO.344589 MY COMMISSION UPIRES MAY 16, 2005 AFFIDAVIT CITY OF TIGARD OREGON The following will be considered by the Tigard Hearings Officer on Wednesday February 19, 2003 at 7:00 PM at the Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. Both public oral and written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the Tigard Municipal Code and the rules of procedure adopted by the Council and available at City Hall or the rules of procedure set forth in Chapter 18.390. Testimony may be submitted in writing prior to or at the public hearing or verbally at the public hearing only. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior to ! the close of the hearing accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to afford the decision-maker an opportunity to respond to the issue precludes appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeal based on that issue. Failure to specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven (7) days prior to the hearing, and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division (staff contact: Morgan Tracy) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 503-639-4171. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00017 > APPEAL OF CASH & CARRY STORES < ITEM ON APPEAL: On January 22, 2003, the Director issued a decision to approve a request for Site Development Review approval to convert an existing 32,380 square foot building from a furniture store (bulk sales use) to a discount grocery store (retail sales use) and future retail tenant space. Apart from re-striping the parking lot and minor fagade changes, no other alterations are proposed. On January 24, 2003 an appeal was filed concerning the imposition of two conditions of approval: Condition #1 which requires a pedestrian easement to the abutting property to the north, and Condition #3 which requires a reciprocal access easement for vehicles provided that the Oregon Department of Transportation approves of such a connection. LOCATION: 11745 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. REVIEW CRITERIA BEING APPEALED: Community Development Code Chapters 18.705 and 18.810. YKIMITY "AP J ;SDR2002.00017 CASH 6 CARRY STORES ` }7 Sri yJl1 t~~' k Val ~ T ' ~ \ I f . _ T 10181 - Publish January 30, 2003. NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLIR, VENDOR OR SELLER: • THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER CITY OF TIGARD Community Development S(utpingA Better Community PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER. AT A MEETING ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 19.2003 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER AT 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2002-00017 FILE TITLE: "APPEAL" OF CASH & CARRY STORE APPLICANT: Smart & Final Stores OWNER: Monaghan Farms, Inc. Attn: Fernando Gallarzo Attn: Tom Deline 600 Citadel Drive 14120 East Evans Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90040 Aurora, CO 80014 ITEM ON APPEAL: On January 22, 2003, the Director issued a decision to approve a request for Site Development Review approval to convert an existing 32,380 square foot building from a furniture store (bulk sales use) to a discount grocery store (retail sales use) and future retail tenant space. Apart from re-striping the parking lot and minor facade changes, no other alterations are proposed. On January 24, 2003 an appeal was filed concerning the imposition of two conditions of approval: Condition #1 which requires a pedestrian easement to the abutting property to the north, and Condition #3 which requires a reciprocal access easement for vehicles provided that the Oregon Department of Transportation approves of such a connection. LOCATION: 11745 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. REVIEW CRITERIA BEING APPEALED: Community Development Code Chapters 18.705 and 18.810. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER AND CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. (684- 2772 MMUNICATIONS 2438 DEVICES LESS TVHOANEONE) (503) WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARINGOTO MAKE ARRANGEM NTS. FOR THE DEAF) NO ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENOWRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THISOOPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE OR DOCUMENTS LESS THAN 7 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE, THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY MAY ALLOW A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING, SUBJECT TO ORS 215.428 OR 227.178. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THE CRITERIA LISTED OR OTHER CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH THE PERSON BELIEVES TO APPLY TO THE DECISION. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST, ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (254) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (254) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MORGAN TRACY AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 OR BY E-MAIL AT moroan0ci.tioard.orms. 3 I VICINITY MAP SDR2002-000 i 1 -I CASH & CARRY _ RETAIL STORE ~I N "EXHIBIT C" WRITTEN TESTIMONY (Applicant's materials and pertinent correspondence filed with Hearings Officer prior to Public Hearing.) • • NO STAFF REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR AGENDA ITEM 2.2 AS THE APPELLANT WITHDREW THEIR APPEAL PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING PACKET MAILING TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER. • • Food • Supplies • Business • Home Donald G. Alvarado Senior Vice President General Counsel (323) 869-7697 City of Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97224 Attn: Mr. Morgan Tracy 600 Citadel Drive Commerce, California 90040 Telefax (323) 869-7862 don.alvarado@smartandfmal.com February 11, 2003 VIA FAX AND FEDERAL EXPRESS Re: SDR 2002-000017 Cash & Carry Stores WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL Dear Mr. Tracy: The undersigned is Senior Vice-President, General Counsel of Smart & Final, the applicant and appellant in the above-referenced matter. It is our understanding that the applicant and/or owner has satisfied all the conditions relating to the City's review of the above-referenced matter. Accordingly, the applicant hereby withdraws its appeal and asks that the hearing date, currently set for February 19, 2003 be vacated. Please proceed to issue any required certificates of occupancy forthwith. Thank your for your attention to this. cc: M. Robinson - Perkins Coie F. Gallarzo - Smart & Final M. Trtek Very tr y yours, G. ado Smart & Final Inc. • Smart & Final Stores • Cash & Carry Stores • Smart & Final Foodservice American Foodservice Distributors • Henry Lee Company • Amerifoods Trading Company JAN 27 2003 17 38 FR PERKINS COIE LLP • Michael C. Robinson wazac 503.727.2264 tamp: robinQPC1 cimcoiexom January 27, 2003 BY FACSINIILE Mr. Richard Bewersdorff Planning Director City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 P. 02/02 Perkins Coin 1211 S.W. Fifth Avenue, Suite 1500 Portland, OR 97zo4-3715 PHONE: 503.27-2000 FAx: 503.727.2222 www,perkinscale.com Re: Application by Smart and Final Stores (Cash and Carry) Dear Mr. Bewersdorff: This office represents the applicant. Please place me on the mailing list for all future notices and receipt of staff reports. If you receive any correspondence on this matter, please provide me with a copy of the correspondence. I appreciate your assistance in the future. Very truly ours, 1 ~ /J Michael C. Robinson MCR:kla cc: Mr. Dan Alvarado (via facsimile) Mr. Fernando Gallarzo (via facsimile) Mr. Morgan Tracy (via facsimile) Mr. Roger Alfred {08554-0055/PA030240.0621 ANCHORAGE • BEIJING BELLEVUE BOISE • CHICAGO DENVER HONG KONG • L05 ANGELES MENLO PARK • OLYMPIA PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SPOKANE • WASHINGTON, D.C. Perkins foie LLP (Perkins Cole LLc in Illinois) 503 727 2222 TO 95036847297 • TOTAL PAGE.02 JAN -24 2003 10:26 FR PERKINS COIE LLP 503 727 2222 TO 95036847297 P.02i02 01723/2063 17:43 FAX 5036847 City of Tigard • 10002 APPEAL FILING FORM FOR LAND USE DECISIONS CITY OF TIOARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Flgrsrd, OR, 97223 (503) 6394171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 The City of Tigard supports the citizen's right to participate In local government. Tigard's Land Use Code, therefore, sets out specific requirements for filing appeals on certain land use decisions. The following form has been developed to assist you in filing an appeal of a land use decision in proper form. To determine what filing fees will be required or to answer any quwdlons you have regarding the appeal process, please contact the Planning Division or the City Recorder at the phonelfax listed at the top of this form. G. ENE NFORMAILO_N Property Address/Location(s) and Name(s) of the -1 Application Being Appealed: qf' o DO I inLi,S SW t'~ac,~c_ Hw-~ How Do You Qualify As A Party?.' vJ~ 4e.P1re SP`,nl- T1--e W" A or. ~s~• a Nd Larry S 01re,S Appellant's Address: 9P-rY-'Zv%5 Lute., Mit SW 5r4' Ave- City/State: P.,r A t, .t 0V-- 7ip; °l1ZO~i Day Phone Where You Can Be Reached:( SOS) Scheduled Date Decision Is To Be Final: Date Notice of Final Decision Was Given: - Z-3 ' O 3 Specific Grounds For Appeal or Review: I V\ C,~7 r ~t S o+~ d In Cam- ~~ov~t }?e r~ti5 C.o : e LLB dared va hpac4 v-, t- S L,~ ~h~ 1 vv. a 0 S t h V1 Vk T- V\ APPEAL FILING FORM "LAND USe DECISIONS FOR STAFF USE ONLY Case No-(s): 5022609 -000/7 Case Name(s): Cas A <.c~rrt 7Pf. Receipt No,, A2plication Accented By: Date: Mproved As To Form By~f Date: 17-03 Denied As To Form By. Date: R0v.15444-02 L1a~lnlmaslers4avisedlapp081.doo REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS /Application Elements Submitted: „UJ Appeal Filing Form (watpieted) ❑ Filing Fee (based on attem Wow) > Olre"a Detan to Rmnbv c awsaw" S 250.00 > NodtiBdR-4-(deposit) t 300.00 > Howiru Raromo i 1100.00 Pi mft Cqnvft4W)Mdn0 Mw to City C Lffa 11.700.00 rte~iw Slgna e(s) of AP Rant(s): I0V6R POR ADMOtM VVIMG WACO TOTAL PAGE.02 • RECD J A R.2 4 2003 Michael C. Robinson PHONE: 503.727.2264 eviAm: mrobinson@perkinscoie.com January 23, 2003 BY FEDERAL EXPRESS James Hendryx Community Development Director City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Notice of Appeal of Type II Decision in SDR 2002-00017 - Cash and Carry Stores Dear Mr. Hendryx: • FAX: 503.727.2222 www.perkinscoie.com I represent the applicant in the above-referenced matter. This letter constitutes our notice of appeal of the planning division decision dated January 22, 2003 approving the application to convert the existing 32,380-square foot building from a furniture store to a discount grocery store. As the applicant, we have standing to appeal. We are appealing the planning division's decision to impose the following two conditions: (a) condition one, which requires the applicant to record a pedestrian access easement for a future pedestrian/bicycle connection to the abutting property to the north; and (b) condition three, which requires the applicant to accept a condition that if ODOT approves a vehicular connection between the subject property and the property to the north, then the two properties shall provide reciprocal easements and construct a vehicular connection when the property to the north develops. The required filing fee in the amount of $250 is attached to this notice of appeal. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Very truly yours, Michael C. Robinson MCR:d.f cc: Don Alvarado Morgan Tracy, City of Tigard [085 54-005 5/PA030230.0921 ?er gins COIF 1211 S.W. Fifth Avenue, Suite 1500 Portland, OR 97204-3715 PHONE: 503.727.2000 ANCHORAGE - BEIJING BELLEVUE BOISE - CHICAGO DENVER HONG KONG • LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK - OLYMPIA PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SPOKANE - WASHINGTON, D.C. Perkins Coie LLP (Perkins Coie LLC in Illinois) CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 Receipt 27200300000000000318 Date: 01/27/2003 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No SDR2002-00017 [LANDUS] Appeal DD - Pln Com 100-0000-438000 Line Item Total: Payments: Method Payer User ID Acct./Check Approval No. How Received Check PERKINS COIE LLP met 9205 In Person Payment Total: PERKINS CODE LLP WELLS FARGO BANK 1211 SW 5TH AVE., STE. 1500 PORTLAND, OR 97201 PORTLAND, OR 97204-3715 24-680-1230 503-727-2000 PAY TO THE ORDER OF City Of Tigard Two Hundred Fifty and 00/100***" 1/27/2003 9:05:47AM Amount Paid 250.00 $250.00 Amount Paid 250.00 $250.00 9205 1 /232003. a c 0 $ **250.00 ° DOLLARS li MEMO / N Anneal fee ! hr i 116009 20 S116 1: 1 2 30068001:0088 SO 2 3 2 3116 Page 1 of 1 cReceipt.rpt