Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Correspondence
10570 SE Washington Street �� /7nn � n � � � n Suite 210 QE W EILL� ENg[I VEERI UVg DESEIg' �G�1 LC�o Portland, OR 97216 CIVIL — STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Tel. 503 - 254 -6292 Fax 503 - 254 -6761 June 8, 2007 RECEIVED JUN 08 2007 Cfri Project: Elite Care Extended Family Residence 3Uii,DING DIVISION 12345 SW Grant St. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Subject: Structural Plan Revisions to Simplify Construction The engineering for the project plan has been revised primarily to simplify the construction of the center section between the two main buildings of the structure. The following list of revisions includes a description of each change and the engineering impact: 1. Embedded Posts: The short shearwalls under the Solarium have been replaced with drag struts and cantilever posts. Five cantilever tube steel posts, each embedded in a 30 inch diameter, 76 inch deep concrete pile are to be constructed under the Solarium and Northeast deck. Eight more embedded tube steel posts are to be constructed to support the looping walkway on the southwest side of the Solarium. The decks, including the looping walkway on the southwest side of the Solarium shall NOT be topped with concrete. The additional seismic load created by the weight of the concrete topping exceeds the resistance capacity of the cantilever tube steel posts. The overstrength factor of 2.5 has still being applied for the plan irregularity in the center section between the main buildings, and an R value of 2.5 has been applied to the seismic loads on the cantilever posts. The enclosed revised lateral engineering shows the location of these posts. 2. Lower Floor Drag Struts: Some of the short shearwalls under the Solarium have been replaced with drag struts that transfer the lateral loads to longer shearwalls. The enclosed revised lateral engineering - shows drag struts on the lower floor at wall lines L10, L12, and L13. The drag strut at L10 is also being assisted in lateral resistance by cantilever posts as described in item #1. The drag straps and beams along with • connections are specified on the revised lateral engineering 3. Middle Floor Drag Struts: A strap shall be installed from the M10 wall line to the floor beam in line with the wall. Detail D2 illustrates the drag strut over the Solarium on the M13 wall line. As shown on Detail D2, two short 24 inch long shearwall sections are to be constructed from Solarium roof to the drag beam to replace the two short shearwalls on the previous design. City of Tigard - Approved Plans FILE COPY B . �a_.�__ Date �.3��7 Y g ,A e 00 0005-3 4. Gyp Board Shearwalls: In order to reduce the amount of APA rated sheathing on interior shearwalls, gyp board shearwalls have been specified to be constructed on the upper floor of the main buildings as shown on the revised lateral engineering. These walls are to be 5/8 inch gyp on both sides fastened on all edges to the framing with 6d cooler or wallboard nails at 4 inches on center. Some of the interior shearwalls on the middle floor are also specified to be constructed with gyp as shown on the revised lateral engineering. The R value in the seismic calculations has been revised to 3 for the gyp board shearwalls as well as a 50% reduction in capacity for seismic category D. 5. Solarium Framing Revision: The framing of the solarium and the walkway above has been revised to eliminate the long ridge beam that was required to span over the top of the upper level walkway. As shown in the enclosed detail F1, framing supports are being constructed every 5 feet along the upper level walkway. A 5 1/8 x 15 GLB every five feet shall support the decking of the upper level walkway as well as support the middle level solarium roof. These beams will span 20 feet. The upper level walkway roof ridge will span five feet and will be supported by the framing shown in detail Fl. A 6x6 beam will carry the walkway wall and Solarium roof load to the glu -lam. 6. Revised Beam Framing Over Kitchen: In order to eliminate one of the posts that came down through the Kitchen counter, the floor beam framing above has been revised as shown in the enclosed floor plan. Beams MB1 and MB2 support the floor and MB2 also supports a point load from beam VB1 that supports the roof rafters. Calculations for the revised lateral engineering and beam calculations are enclosed with this letter. Connection details required for the described revisions are also enclosed herewith. Questions and comments regarding the changes described above are to be addressed to Todd Rowell at 503 - 254 -6292. 4EI' QR OFF �� �� / % Q S367P A / • REG 0 � 0 „•22,� T RO I EXPIRES: DEC. 31, 06 . 1 .• 10570 SE Washington Street Suite 210 a:WELL DglINE G° INg DC D IgH ORO. Portland, OR 97216 CIVIL — STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Tel. 503 - 254 -6292 Fax 503 - 254 -6761 June 8, 2007 RECEIVED JUN 0 . 8 2001 CITY Of ituARD Project: Elite Care Extended Family Residence &U JDING DIVISION ,123SW Grant St. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Subject: Structural Plan Revisions to Simplify Construction The engineering for the project plan has been revised primarily to simplify the construction of the center section between the two main buildings of the structure. The following list of revisions includes a description of each change and the engineering impact: 1. Embedded Posts: The short shearwalls under the Solarium have been replaced with drag struts and cantilever posts. Five cantilever tube steel posts, each embedded in a 30 inch diameter, 76 inch deep concrete pile are to be constructed under the Solarium and Northeast deck. Eight more embedded tube steel posts are to be constructed to support the looping walkway on the southwest side of the Solarium. The decks, including the looping walkway on the southwest side of the Solarium shall NOT be topped with concrete. The additional seismic load created by the weight of the concrete topping exceeds the resistance capacity of the cantilever tube steel posts. The overstrength factor of 2.5 has still being applied for the plan irregularity in the center section between the main buildings, and an R value of 2.5 has been applied to the seismic loads on the cantilever . posts. The enclosed revised lateral engineering shows the location of these posts. 2. Lower Floor Drag Struts: Some of the short shearwalls under the Solarium have been replaced with drag struts that transfer the lateral . loads to longer shearwalls. The enclosed revised lateral engineering - shows drag struts on the lower floor at wall lines L10, L12, and L13. The drag strut at L10 is also being assisted in lateral resistance by cantilever posts as described in item #1. The drag straps and beams along with • connections are specified on the revised lateral engineering. 3. Middle Floor Drag Struts: A strap shall be installed from the M10 wall line 1 to the floor beam in line with the wall. Detail D2 illustrates the drag strut over the Solarium on the M13 wall line. As shown on Detail D2, two short ' 24 inch long shearwall sections are to be constructed from Solarium roof to the drag beam to replace the two short shearwalls on the previous design. City of Tigard OFFICE COPY Approved Plans Lay — Date . _C ;a .,- p 4. Gyp Board Shearwalls: In order to reduce the amount of APA rated sheathing on interior shearwalls, gyp board shearwalls have been specified to be constructed on the upper floor of the main buildings as shown on the revised lateral engineering. These walls are to be 5/8 inch gyp on both sides fastened on all edges to the framing with 6d cooler or wallboard nails at 4 inches on center. Some of the interior shearwalls on the middle floor are also specified to be constructed with gyp as shown on the revised lateral engineering. The R value in the seismic calculations has been revised to 3 for the gyp board shearwalls as well as a 50% reduction in capacity for seismic category D. 5. Solarium Framing Revision: The framing of the solarium and the walkway above has been revised to eliminate the long ridge beam that was required to span over the top of the upper level walkway. As shown in the enclosed detail F1, framing supports are being constructed every 5 feet along the upper level walkway. A 5 1/8 x 15 GLB every five feet shall support the decking of the upper level walkway as well as support the middle level solarium roof. These beams will span 20 feet. The upper level walkway roof ridge will span five feet and will be supported by the framing shown in detail Fl. A 6x6 beam will carry the walkway wall and Solarium roof load to the glu -lam. 6. Revised Beam Framing Over Kitchen: In order to eliminate one of the posts that came down through the Kitchen counter, the floor beam framing above has been revised as shown in the enclosed floor plan. Beams MB1 and MB2 support the floor and MB2 also supports a point load from beam VB1 that supports the roof rafters. Calculations for the revised lateral engineering and beam calculations are enclosed with this letter. Connection details required for the described revisions are also enclosed herewith. Questions and comments regarding the changes described above are to be addressed to Todd Rowell at 503 - 254 -6292. QED PROP I , p GIN 4 � ` 67P L / / REGO Orr t EXPIRES: DEC. 31, Page 1 of 5 ct: prrE Subj: FW: Update on Remaining Tasks for Grant Street Project Date: 3/5/2007 9:46:24 A.M. Pacific Standard Time 0 v 2um From: monroestreetassociates @earthlink.net ;�� • To: CPMARCH @aol.com ,, I This is the latest check list response. -C11 " T � Original Message--- - From: Scott Churchill [mailto: monroestreetassociates @earthlink.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 5:54 PM To: markv @tigard - or.gov Cc: brianb @tigard - or.gov; 'Bill Reed'; 'Mark Reed'; CPMARCH @aol.com; 'Lilly'; Todd Rowell; Scott Churchill Subject: RE: Update on Remaining Tasks for Grant Street Project Mark, Per our previous agreement, we have made the progress on our Plan Check Final Task List as noted below: 1) Change the Structural Sheet S -1 so that it includes a revised foundation plan from Rowell noting their current design. ** Structural Sheet S -1 has been revised to add the most current foundation plan which corresponds with the Plans which Ray Miller has reviewed. ** 2) Make the correction on Structural Sheet S -1 to include a missing beam size on their 1st Floor Structural Plan. (middle of plan currently noted as 4 x _ beam) ** Structural Sheet S -1 has been revised to include a note which defines that beam as a 4" x 10" DF # 2 ** 3) Remove notes from the Architectural Foundation Plan regarding Post size, embedment and anchoring details under the walkway. Place a reference note on the Architectural Foundation Plan noting "see sheet S -1 foundation plan for all Anchoring details and Member sizes ". Confirm that the Architectural Foundation plan matches the Engineering Foundation Plan Requirements. ** Notes have been removed from the Architectural Foundation Plan and a reference note has been added "see sheet S -1 foundation plan for all Anchoring details and Member sizes." Architectural and Engineering documents are now consistent. ** 4) Rowell engineering to review the TJI- joist plans issued from the TJI manufacturer and note them as "general compliance review and approval by Rowell Engineering" and issue them to the City of Tigard. ** Rowell has completed their review of the TJI -floor joist plans issued from the TJI manufacturer and has issued a letter regarding them as in "general compliance ". These documents and letter from Rowell Monday, March 05, 2007 America Online: CPMARCH • Page 2 of 5 will be included in the final submission. ** 5) Revise the Architectural Set to include a properly rated and automatic closing smoke sealed door on life safety system magnetic hold opens to cover each of the elevator doors on the landings on each floor. ** Craig Monaghan, Architect of Record has reviewed this request by the City of Tigard and has added a 1 hr rated smoke sealed door on magnetic hold opens to cover the elevator door on each floor level. ** 6) Add an additional note on the architectural plans at the sliding doors where a heavy duty safety guard rail is required. This heavy duty guard rail is to be noted as minimum 42" high with openings through which a 4" sphere will not pass. ** Craig Monaghan, Architect of Record has reviewed this Plan Check request by the City of Tigard and has added a note to "provide a 42" high heavy duty guard rail with openings through which a 4" sphere will not pass. ** 7) Revise door swings on Architectural plans to swing in the direction of travel as noted on the most recent City of Tigard Plan check set. ** The two door swings on Second Floor level have been changed on the Architectural set per the noted change request by the City of Tigard Plan check. This has been changed on all appropriate sheets A- 1.0, A2.2, FLS -2 ** 8) Issue to the City of Tigard a reference note and documentation using US Gypsum or UL approved ratings for the wall ratings noted on the Architectural Plans. ** This is an issue which was addressed by Mark Reed with Val Henzel earlier on 10/6/06 but has been added on the Architectural Plans A 3.2, A3.3. The notes read US Gypsum Association ratings For Floors and Ceilings - FC -5120 For walls - WP 3240 '" 9) Adjust all plans so that the revised landing width of 3 ft minimum on front entry stairs is consistent on the FLS sheets as well as the 1 /8th architectural sheets. All plans to show this corrected landing. ** A note clarifying the minimum 3' -0" landing depth for the front entry stairs has been added to all drawings. ** Please confirm via email that this will address your remaining Plan Check concerns upon the submission of the revised set of documents, and that upon these corrections being reviewed and found to be complete a permit will be issued. Regards, Monday, March 05, 2007 America Online: CPMARCH Page 3 of 5 Scott Churchill - - -- Original Message--- - From: Scott Churchill [mailto: monroestreetassociates @earthlink.net] Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 7:16 PM To: markv @tigard - or.gov Cc: brianb @tigard - or.gov; 'Bill Reed'; 'Mark Reed'; CPMARCH @aol.com; 'Lilly'; 'Scott Churchill' Subject: FW: Follow -up notes to the our meeting earlier today Mark, Thank you for your confirmation of the remaining task list items. We will work with the Architect of Record, Engineer and Ownership to complete these final tasks necessary to achieve the City of Tigard Plan Check approval which will allow us to proceed to the issuance of a building permit. Regards, Scott Original Message From: Mark VanDomelen [mailto:MARKV @tigard- or.gov] Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 8:51 AM To: monroestreetassociates @earthlink.net Subject: Re: Follow -up notes to the our meeting earlier today Dear Scott, I look forward to moving forward with this project. Based on my limited involvement with these plans, I agree that resolving these issues will satisfy the City of Tigard's concerns at the plan review stage. Sincerely, Mark VanDomelen Plans Examination Supervisor City of Tigard (503)718 -2759 markv @tigard- or.gov Original Message--- - From: Scott Churchill [mailto: monroestreetassociates @earthlink.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 11:02 PM To: markv @tigard- or.gov; raym @millerengrs.com Cc: 'Bill Reed'; 'Mark Reed'; CPMARCH @aol.com; 'Lilly'; brianb @tigard- or.gov; 'Scott Churchill' Subject: Follow -up notes to the our meeting earlier today Mark and Ray, Thank you both for your time to review the documents Monday, March 05, 2007 America Online: CPMARCH Page 4 of 5 related to the Grant Street Elite Care Project. Per our findings, the most recent set of structural drawings in Val's file with the City of Tigard was not the most current design from Rowell Engineering under review by Miller Engineering. Miller Engineering did however have the most recent set of Structural Drawings from Rowell which superceded the 12.1.06 revision. This latest revision set by Rowell is the one upon which the Architectural Document revisions were made. Miller Engineering is prepared to issue their final approval of the structural engineering on this project once documents have been re- issued to them through the City of Tigard. The City of Tigard will be re- issuing, project documents to Miller Engineering for their final review upon completion of items from the task list below. Per our agreement, here are my notes of the Final Task List that is being required by the City of Tigard. Per our understanding, upon completion of these tasks, the City of Tigard will issue a building permit for this Grant Street Elite Care Assisted Living. Project. 1) Change the Structural Sheet S -1 so that it includes a revised foundation plan from Rowell noting their current design. 2) Make the correction on Structural Sheet S -1 to include a missing beam size on their 1st Floor Structural Plan. (middle of plan currently noted as 4 x _ beam) 3) Remove notes from the Architectural Foundation Plan regarding Post size, embedment and anchoring details under the walkway. Place a reference note on the Architectural Foundation Plan. noting to "see sheet S -1 foundation plan for all Anchoring details and Member sizes ". Confirm that the Architectural-Foundation plan matches the Engineering Foundation Plan requirements. 4) Rowell engineering to review the TJI- joist plans issued from the The TJI manufacturer and note them as "general compliance review and approval by Rowell Engineering" and issue them to the City of Tigard. 5) Revise the Architectural Set to include a properly rated and automatic closing smoke sealed door on life safety system magnetic hold opens to cover each of the elevator doors on the landings on each floor. 6) Add an additional note on the architectural plans at the sliding doors where a A heavy duty safety guard rail is required. This heavy duty guard rail is to be noted as minimum 42" high with openings through which a 4" sphere will not pass. 7) Revise door swings on Architectural plans to swing in the direction of travel as noted On the most recent City of Tigard Plan check set. 8) Issue to the City of Tigard a reference note and documentation using US Gypsum or UL approved ratings For the wall ratings noted on the Architectural Plans. 9) Adjust all plans so that the revised landing width of 3 ft minimum on front entry stairs is consistent on the FLS sheets Monday, March 05, 2007 America Online: CPMARCH Page 5 of 5 y IP As well as the 1 /8th architectural sheets. All plans to show this corrected landing. Please confirm back via email that these notes are consistent with you understanding of our agreement so that these final adjustments to the documents can be made. Regards, Scott Churchill (503) 929 9138 Monday, March 05, 2007 America. Online: CPMARCH . 10570 SE Washington Street � 22 � Suite 210 HOWELL IEKIg V�nt�LElr-IHN E DD EOPH l 0 Portland, OR 97216 CIVIL — STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS AFL /( - Tel. 503 254 6292 .'-' i4 Fax: 503- 254''67,6,1 November 30, 2006 NOV L 0' 2006 Project: Elite Care Extended Family Residence ■---.-- I. ui- _. _�_ . -- a353 123115 SW Grant St. -, `, . 17- ".-err -.��" ; 1,-.- • Tigard, Oregon 97223 This letter is being prepared in response to the Structural Plan Review #2, dated November 1, 2006. This is an item by item response to the unresolved concerns of the plan review. Rowell Engineering did not accomplish the original vertical calculations for this plan, however we have been asked to address all of the . remaining plan check items. Item 7 - The enclosed calculations for the roof members of the main building structures include the increased snow drift loads. The roof rafters that span 22 feet have been revised to 4x14 DF #2 members at 24 inches on center. Item 11 - No special inspections are required for this type V building with no high load diaphragms. Special inspection will be required if post installed epoxy anchors are required. A Quality Assurance Plan has been enclosed that specifies this requirement. Item 12 - A Quality Assurance Plan is enclosed. However, with a Type V building no special inspections are required. Item 13 - The enclosed roof framing member calculations for sheet A5.2 include snow drifting loads identified in item 7 above. Beams that have been revised are as follows: . 1. Large main roof rafters, Beam #1, are now 4x14's @ 24 inches on center. 2. Beam #4 spanning main building dormers are now 5.125 x 10.5 GLBs. 3. Beam #6, the main ridge over openings is now specified as a 5.125x9GLB. . 4. The ridge over the Fireplace 'Library, Beam #8, is now specified as a 3125 x 10.5 GLB. i 5. The ridge support beam over the Fireplace Library, Beam #7, is now a 5.125 x 13.5 GLB, 6. The ridge over the upper hall, Beam #9, is now a 5.125 x 19.5 GLB. Item 14 - This item is to be accomplished by deferred submittal. Respectfully submitted, 7 - 1,4 Todd Rowell PE 10570 SE Washington Street p �� 2n n � n Suite 210 M ° , C L E L L EN L ONEEQOHig % D D 2 @OgN B I R O . Portland, OR 97216 CIVIL — STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Tel. 503-254-6292 Fax 503 - 254 -6761 • Quality Assurance Plan . Project: Elite Care Extended Family Residence 12345 SW Grant St. . Tigard, Oregon 97223 Special Inspection: Retrofit epoxy holdown anchor installations require continuous special inspection_ if"required. Retrofit anchor specifications are to be provided by the engineer at the time retrofit anchors are required. • Structural Observation: Structural observation is required once footings are formed and prior to pour. Contractor is to notify the design engineer prior to concrete pour. • Structural observation is required at the time of the framing inspection. Contractor is to notify the design engineer prior to framing inspection. Structural observation is required prior to occupancy certificate, • ,,?& PRO PRO,r� � 5 �GINE /p . . !� 58367P 2v i QREGO >' O OT 22, „ rf 0 00 t RO�,t� I EXPIRES: DEC. 31, [96 1 . 05/07/2007 14:48 5032546761 ROWELL ENGINEERING PAGE 02/02 f� ��AI�t1 ri 2�Ar i��2I�1�I1r.��f� r� 10570 SE Washington Street L=ti� V11 EILLS 1.�I1VU�ll�gE ,SUl1 g C DE@IjgH] prig,, Portland, OR 97216 trililfm' CIVIL, — STr?UCTUf?AL ENGINEEF?S Tel. 503 -254 -6292 Fax 503 -254 -6761 May 7, 2007 4 *Jr gr" TILE COPY Project: Elite Care Extended Family Residence 12345 SW Grant St. Tigard, Oregon 97223 u oo' O&j Subject Monolithic Foundation Pour Detail 18 on sheet 3.3 of the project plan shows that the foundation is to be constructed prior to the slab, Alternate to the two pour concrete foundation and slab construction, a monolithic foundation and slab pour may be accomplished. The monolithic construction may be accomplished provided the holdowns and anchor bolts are embedded at the same depth, and the rebar is placed as specified. In details 16 through 20 on sheet 3.3, #5 rebar continuous is specified to be installed. For details 16 through 20, three continuous #4 bars may be used in construction instead of the specified two or three #5 bars. Questions or comments regarding this letter are to be addressed to Todd Rowell at 503-254-6292. » P AOte s , , _ $ 7P : 6 f�/ or �, " ARE `V Iv ib ?, RO i EXPIRES: DEC_31, Vtif., 1 , P95f° 5 k/ 1 )/ v, C D RECEIVED JUL 2 5 2006 City of Tigard, Oregon CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd. BUILDING DIVISION Tigard, OR 97223 Attention: Val Henzel, Senior Plans Examiner Brian Blalock, Plans Examination Supervisor C RE: Response to City of Tigard Plan Check for Grant Street Elite Care Building. Issue in question: Exiting Capacity r, T Response Item # . reftt 16) Egress path and occupant load 1004, 1013, 1014 n Response: See attached Occupancy Load Detailed Calculations 4 4( Addressing loads using section 1004, 1005, table 1005.1, 1013 and 1014 18) Stairway design requirements based on occupant load 1009 Response: See attached Occupancy Load Detailed Calculations Addressing section 1004, 1005, and table 1005.1 Val and Brian, Here are the detailed area calculations /occupancy calculations which support our project design. As you know each load is split between two exits. IBC 2003 Table 1004.1.2 (page 192) Institutional areas Inpatient treatment areas — 240 gross (sq ft) Outpatient areas - 100 gross Sleeping areas — 120 gross Sheet FLS —1 First floor Unit # 1 - Bedroom — 255 sq ft Living — 306 sq ft Unit # 2 Living — 206 sq ft Unit # 3 Bedroom — 130 sq ft Living — 217 sq ft Unit #4 Bedroom — 171 sq ft Living — 333 sq ft Area Calculations Cale all bedrooms (Institutional Sleeping Areas) at 120 sq ft /occupant Calc living areas (Institutional Sleeping Areas) at 120 sf ft /occupant St Office Area (Business) at 100 sf ft /occupant ' ) .c S6 Activity Room (assembly) at 15 sq ft /occupant 5 gC � Sleeping Area = 255 + 130 + 171 = 556 sq ft /120/• t = 4.633 occupan �' 7 Living Area = 306 + 206 + 217 + 333 = 1062 sq 't/200 .q ft /occupant .31 ccupants Massage /Office = 156 sq ft /100 sq ft /occupant = . occupants Activity Room = 295 sq ft /15 sq ft /occupant = 19.66 occupants Total Occupancy = 31.16 occupants IBC 2003 Table 1004.1.2 (page 192) Institutional areas Inpatient treatment areas — 240 gross (sq ft) Outpatient areas - 100 gross Sleeping areas — 120 gross Sheet FLS — 2 Second floor Unit #1 - Bath — 56 sq ft Living — 366 sq ft Unit #2 Bath — 56 sq ft Living — 365 sq ft Unit #3 Bath — 59 sq ft Living — 439 sq ft Unit # 4 Bedroom — 148 sq ft Bath — 59 sq ft Living — 274 sq ft Unit # 5 Bedroom — 129 sq ft Bath — 56 sq ft Living — 240 sq ft Unit # 6 Bath — 56 sq ft Living — 403 sq ft Dining Area — 376 sq ft Common Living Area — 353 sq ft Sitting Area # 1 — 213 sq ft Sitting Area # 2 — 207 sq ft Area Calculations Calc all bedrooms (Institutional Sleeping Areas) at 120 sq ft /occupant Calc living areas (Residential) at 120 sf ft /occupant Calc Common Living Area at 15 sq ft /occupant Calc Dining Area at 15 sq ft /occupant Calc Sitting Area at 15 sq ft /occupant Sleeping Area = 148 + 129 = 277 sq ft /120 /occupant = 2.31 occupants Living Area = 366 + 365 + 439 + 274 + 240 + 403 = 2087 sq ft /120 sq ft /occupant = 17.39 occupants Common Living Area = 353 sq ft /15 sq ft /occupant = 23.53 occupants Dining Area = 376 sq ft /15 sq ft /occupant = 25.067 occupants Sitting Area = 420 sq ft /15 sq ft /occupant = 28.00 occupants Total Occupancy = 96.297 occupants IBC 2003 Table 1004.1.2 (page 192) Institutional areas Inpatient treatment areas — 240 gross (sq ft) Outpatient areas - 100 gross Sleeping areas — 120 gross Sheet FLS — 3 Third floor Unit #1 - Bath — 56 sq ft Living — 366 sq ft Unit # 2 Bath — 56 sq ft Living — 365 sq ft Unit # 3 Bath — 59 sq ft Living — 439 sq ft Unit # 4 Bath — 59 sq ft Living — 443 sq ft Unit # 5 Bath — 55 sq ft Living — 403 sq ft Unit # 6 Bath — 56 sq ft Living — 402 sq ft Library — 203 sq ft Common Living Area — 575 sq ft Area Calculations Calc all bedrooms (Institutional Sleeping Areas) at 120 sq ft /occupant Calc living areas (Residential) at 120 sf ft /occupant Calc Common Living Area at 15 sq ft /occupant Calc Library at 50 sq ft /occupant Living Area = 366 + 365 + 439 + 443 + 403 + 402 = 2418 sq ft /120 sq ft /occupant = 20.15 occupants Common Living Area = 575 sq ft /15 sq ft /occupant = 38.33 occupants Library Area = 203 sq ft /50 sq ft /occupant = 4.06 occupants Total Occupancy = 62.54 occupants Feb.27. 2007 12:27PM ICON architecture /planning inc. No.4316 P. 2 Obi -*"...•ATA Document G7I6TM - 2004 Request for Information ("RFI') TO: FROM: NNOW< Vi �N I � D/ N L tW Dan L Goodrich ALA ICON architecture - planning inc. 9725 SW 13eavertun Hillsdale Hwy, Suite SlOE Beaverton, OR 97005 PROJECT: ISSUE DATE :7 // c 7 RFI No. 6,0/Z Oak Street Townhomes / 8875 SW Oak St. ' Tigard, OR 97223 • • REQUESTED REPLY DATE:/k7/07 � PROJECT NUMBERS: 10009.04 / Pending COPIES TO: ,vR • RFI DESCRIPTION: (Fully describe the question Or type of information requested.) F f A f -T-p w or D p i7 Cr 77/E,r ,9A' 3c • , w. r .e 57 t 6t4.2A1N v r7 /mss #1.0 o3 r • REFERENCES /ATTACHMENTS: (List specific documents researched when seeking the information requested.• SPECIFICATIONS: DRAWINGS: i oppla/Ep OTHER: • • • SENDER'S RECOMMENDATION: (if RFI concerns a site or construction condition, the sender may provide a • recommended solution, including cost and /or schedule considerations.) 19 • • • • RECEIVER'S REPLY: (Provide answer to RE!, including cost and/or schedule considerations.) _..�._ BY DATE COPIES TO Note: This reply is not an authorization to proceed with work involving additional cost, time or both. It any reply requires a change to the Contract Documents, a Change Order, Construction Change Directive or a Minor Change in the work must be executed in accordance with the Contract Documents. • AIR Document G716T..• 2004. Copyright ® 2004 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This 43A Document Is protected fey U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this Alps Docirment, or any portion of it may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and wit br prosecuted to the maximum oxiant possible under the law. 'This document was produced by AIR software Cl 10:17:53 on 10/23/2006 under Order No.1000262901_1 which expires on 10/9/2007. and is not for resale. User Notes: (2796378071 Feb.27. 2007 12:28PM ICON architecture /planning Inc. No.4316 P. 3 d ti AIA Document G7IOTM —1992 Architect's Supplemental Instructions PROJECT (Name and address): ARCHITECT'S SUPPLEMENTAL OWNER; ❑ Oak Street Townhomes INSTRUCTION NO: t).0/0- 8875 SW Oak St. ARCHITECT`) Tigard, OR 97223 CONSULTANT: ❑ OWNER (Name and address): DATE OF ISSUANCE: CONTRACTOR: 11 Oak Street Townhomes l,i,C FIELD; ❑ 12670 SW 68th Ave. Ste 400 CONTRACT FOR: General Construction Tigard, OR 97223 -8370 OTHER' El FROM ARCHITECT (Name and CONTRACT DATE: 24x7/07 address): ICON architecture- planning inc. 9725 SW Beaverton Hillsdale Hwy. Suite .S 1 OE Beaverton, OR 97005 TO CONTRACTOR (Name and ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NUMBER: address): 1 0009.04 • The Work shall be carried out in accordance with the following supplemental instructions issued in accordance with the Contract Documents without change in Contract Sum or Contract Time. Proceeding with the Work in accordance with these instructions indicates your acknowledgment that there will he no change in the Contract Sum or Contract Time. DESCRIPTION: "L. pge1y N n,(4/07e SoLTs fs kW. o f - • ATTACHMENTS: j / ti/.5.t-r) (Here insert listing of documents that support description.) J� • ISS ; THE ARCHITECT: • 4 Dan L. Goodrich AIA (Signatu e) (Printed name and title) AIA Docu , ent 0710" -1992. Copyright c i 1980 and 1992 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. 'WARNING; This Alta ' document protccto • by U.S. Copyrigrit Las and International Treaties, Unauthorized reproduction or distribution et this AlA "' Document, or pny portion of St, may resutl to severe civil and criminal tetnattiss, and will be prosecuted to the msximorn extent possible under the Ievv, This document was produced by AIA software at 12:05:22 on 10/23/2006 under Order No.1000262901 1 which expires on 1019/2007, and is not for resale. User Notes: — (2353406721) Feb.27. 2007 12:28PM ICON architecture/planning Inc. No.4316 P. 4 ---1 I, 1 . GI PL4.54-1iNG : 4 [ 1 4 ' .II --- ) ... 4 .. BOLTED P.T. RAILER -.0101111 NI' BEAM - WE FLAN 01 44 IDOT. OF Bm 5/9 STEEL PLATE x BEAM L/4 FLANGE Wm id lair DIA Dous HORIZONTAL BRICK MASONRY ILRAP „ HORIZONTAL TIES II) 2.4" 0/C "II STEEL - SEE 'V r II I ' .. BRICK SURRCIIND MK AIR SPACE 111/ al • LAYERS TYPE 'X' G.U.U3. ri STOWS et arc FOR 48* . .. W/ i' c+Ratt Jag*, OMTT I-IEAD JOINT . coreRETE SLAD WHORE AT BOTTal 1 I/ V 7 accuR5 ., \A, SEE FIX PLAN __ ... 9 17 ' AI ^' e 1 1,r , ' , a A • a a' . 1 7 ' = "1..= A A . *'' T -1 ' .*:... =A— • OP • I • i i ' r i I . . I IA 1 • 1 1 . • ; 1 1... _ _ L LL _j 1 ' . °V -51 • .. v r MIMIIM11.11161Eirll1k.11■1111'' _ A—A f ' , • . • GRADE BM • SEE •--- ° J.- -.'-. T-L- ' ' A .,' FND, PLAN FOR SIZE 4 REBAR RE05. W ANCAOR at YMIN EMBED, IC CONCRETE FOOTING - TOTAL OF CEvELDPIENT L1345114. Tcp. ZE FIA PLAN REBAR P FtalIRtp, SEE FOti. RAN POR WI 4 SPACING /4 t oit r CRYPALK r , _...4., BRICK SURROUND MIN. I' 1 - I i l' l' - - - - ' l' AIR SPACE ID/ i' 5ita. lite tut c.,, CIA= JOINTS, 5/6 k ID' APEAzAz (P (4 OMIT TEAL) JoiNT BOLTS I BEI 1 AT BOTTOM El 0 STEEL. COI-UMNI DETAIL. SCALE! 314' = r-0' Ts i:iNLII I) I OR -- — Itsi.t Dam 5,11nA A PROPOSED PROJECT FOR: 1 inc. CoN trchitccture/pleinnin g J013.1411' 11 001131 0/ '''Y trAve4 nr min OAK STREET TOWNHOMES, LLC exa . -...- . 8875 SW OAK STREET . P 4 OM 8W Eltwatun Mt.& 11.7. .. — TIGARD, OR 97223 -14 . t ha GO CM IBM toCAPII OF t ' Alma.% env* AW.3.X. MAPA■AudIA4 SHEETS TOTAL . , . Feb.27. 2007 12:28PM ICON architecture /planning inc. No.4316 P. 5 I BUULDING WRAP 2x STUDS - SEE . f FRMG. PLAN )i" PLYWOOD P.T. SOLE PLATE - --- . __... SEE FRMG• PLAN STFFI COLUMN - SEE FRAMING PLAN ! . ' — — 1 . ..... a _ n - STEM WALL - SEA GRADE BM SEE ` — — , END- PLAN FND. PLAN ., ` A CONCRETE SLAB WHERE } �;' 5'' •CCURS - SEE MN. PLAN 4 . 1 {jiff i.}��� .: V. STFFI PLATE :Z °21. 13 STIRRUPS - q ` "•' . ` • SEE END. PLAN I" DRrPACK.u.: b - ".w ..,.,.. . o • !'- �: "' "iik. CONTINUOUS FOOTING - SEE FND. PLAN 4 '7 4 • . 4 • LA . L • 6 ..,- Y "3 ° • A • ' • • • A • ' ^ • CONCRETE FOOTING - . SEE FDN. PLAN " ANCHOR BOLT 5 "MIN EMBED, 10" REAR IF REQUIRED, TOTAL OF DEVELOPMENT LENGTH. TYP. SEE FDN. PLAN FOR SITE 4 SPACING 2i• ' a s /e ' x 10" 2 3. 2i . m. moli ANCHOR BOLT n II C:) (;• • ?) (3 • • ll ; ; 14 ._ I '.. " F S TEEL PLATE-- (CO f5 , ( *) STEEL TIJ E Cry) c 0 ) _ P-8 j . 0 STEEL COLUMN1 DETAIL SCALE. 34' _ 1' -0' ..._ dUVRJPY. A !cFVED FOR �u �h C427C427/Co .. .. _, �E ��, - A PROPOSED PROJECT FOR: �V ' 1 f C(� A �V t arcPlitccturc /planning inc. JOB NUMBER MOOD Do .� I , v "`� .. . OAK STREET TOWNHOMES, LLC ij i/ 1g 8875 SW OAK STREET 1 " em "1maxiuM .��w 71 . ,, '.w TIGARD, OR 97223 ` ,i aw:8 roe. h 211 I Ts TOTAL QF 1 B.».,on,O vvvsve� arQw,.mwJ.wn m,.,.,mvv.,m•v: rx u I / V `""? � 5f O r O RECE WED JUL 2 5 2006 City of Tigard, Oregon CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd. BUILDING DIVISION Tigard, OR 97223 Attention: Val Henzel, Senior Plans Examiner Brian Blalock, Plans Examination Supervisor RE: Response to City of Tigard Plan Check for Grant Street Elite Care Building. Issue in question: Exiting Capacity Response Item # 16) Egress path and occupant load 1004, 1013, 1014 Response: See attached Occupancy Load Detailed Calculations 74 Addressing loads using section 1004, 1005, table 1005.1, 1013 and 1014 18) Stairway design requirements based on occupant load 1009 Response: See attached Occupancy Load Detailed Calculations Addressing section 1004, 1005, and table 1005.1 Val and Brian, Here are the detailed area calculations /occupancy calculations which support our project design. As you know each load is split between two exits. IBC 2003 Table 1004.1.2 (page 192) Institutional areas Inpatient treatment areas — 240 gross (sq ft) Outpatient areas - 100 gross Sleeping areas — 120 gross Sheet FLS —1 First floor Unit #1 - Bedroom — 255 sq ft Living — 306 sq ft Unit # 2 Living — 206 sq ft Unit # 3 Bedroom — 130 sq ft Living — 217 sq ft Unit # 4 Bedroom — 171 sq ft Living — 333 sq ft Area Calculations Calc all bedrooms (Institutional Sleeping Areas) at 120 sq ft /occupant Calc living areas (Institutional Sleeping Areas) at 120 sf ft /occupant it Office Area (Business) at 100 sf ft /occupant ' a,0 56 Activity Room (assembly) at 15 sq ft /occupant 5 gS '/ Sleeping Area = 255 + 130 + 171 = 556 sq ft /120/ • t = 4.633 occupan Living Area = 306 + 206 + 217 + 333 = 1062 sq 't /20i :q ft /occupant .31 ccupants Massage /Office = 156 sq ft /100 sq ft /occupant = . occupants Activity Room = 295 sq ft /15 sq ft /occupant = 19.66 occupants Total Occupancy = 31.16 occupants tr. IBC 2003 Table 1004.1.2 (page 192) Institutional areas Inpatient treatment areas — 240 gross (sq ft) Outpatient areas - 100 gross Sleeping areas — 120 gross Sheet FLS — 2 Second floor Unit #1 - Bath — 56 sq ft Living — 366 sq ft Unit # 2 Bath — 56sgft Living — 365 sq ft Unit # 3 Bath — 59 sq ft Living — 439 sq ft Unit #4 Bedroom — 148 sq ft Bath — 59 sq ft Living — 274 sq ft Unit # 5 Bedroom — 129 sq ft Bath — 56 sq ft Living — 240 sq ft Unit # Bath — 56 sq ft Living — 403 sq ft Dining Area — 376 sq ft Common Living Area — 353 sq ft Sitting Area # 1 — 213 sq ft Sitting Area # 2 — 207 sq ft Area Calculations Calc all bedrooms (Institutional Sleeping Areas) at 120 sq ft /occupant Calc living areas (Residential) at 120 sf ft /occupant Calc Common Living Area at 15 sq ft /occupant Calc Dining Area at 15 sq ft /occupant Calc Sitting Area at 15 sq ft /occupant Sleeping Area = 148 + 129 = 277 sq ft /120 /occupant = 2.31 occupants Living Area = 366 + 365 + 439 + 274 + 240 + 403 = 2087 sq ft /120 sq ft /occupant = 17.39 occupants Common Living Area = 353 sq ft /15 sq ft /occupant = 23.53 occupants Dining Area = 376 sq ft /15 sq ft /occupant = 25.067 occupants Sitting Area = 420 sq ft /15 sq ft /occupant = 28.00 occupants Total Occupancy = 96.297 occupants IBC 2003 Table 1004.1.2 (page 192) Institutional areas Inpatient treatment areas — 240 gross (sq ft) Outpatient areas - 100 gross Sleeping areas — 120 gross Sheet FLS — 3 Third floor Unit #1 - Bath — 56 sq ft Living — 366 sq ft Unit #2 Bath — 56 sq ft Living — 365 sq ft Unit # 3 Bath — 59 sq ft Living — 439 sq ft Unit #4 Bath — 59 sq ft Living — 443 sq ft Unit # 5 Bath — 55 sq ft Living — 403 sq ft Unit # 6 Bath — 56 sq ft Living — 402 sq ft Library — 203 sq ft Common Living Area — 575 sq ft Area Calculations Calc all bedrooms (Institutional Sleeping Areas) at 120 sq ft /occupant Calc living areas (Residential) at 120 sf ft /occupant Calc Common Living Area at 15 sq ft /occupant Calc Library at 50 sq ft /occupant Living Area = 366 + 365 + 439 + 443 + 403 + 402 = 2418 sq ft /120 sq ft /occupant = 20.15 occupants Common Living Area = 575 sq ft /15 sq ft /occupant = 38.33 occupants Library Area = 203 sq ft /50 sq ft /occupant = 4.06 occupants Total Occupancy = 62.54 occupants ) bir 10570 SE Washington Street � pn 2n n Suite 210 R OO W LEL D. DRfiggI EIERO § DEROgIN D45 Portland, OR 97216 ET CIVIL — STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Tel. 503-254-6292 Fax 503 -254 -6761 February 19, 2007. • • a n t Project: Elite Care Extended Family Residence . r , , O G 2001 12345 SW Grant St. ,3r,'‘ Tigard, Oregon 97223 �i7N4ja 1 AI, 17 11V— Subject: Trimjoist Layout Conformity Review • The enclosed Trimjoist manufactured floor joist layout has been reviewed for general conformance with the design concept of the project and general compliance with the information given in the contract documents. The third floor layout appears to have floor joists shown in an area that is not planned to have a floor system. The area of concern is identified and marked up on the enclosed layout plan from Trimjoist. Provided that the floor joist plan is corrected to eliminate the floor joists identified on the third floor of the enclosed plan, the layout is in general conformance with the design concept of the plan. The contractor is responsible for dimensions, which shall be confirmed and correlated at the job site, fabrication processes and techniques of construction, coordination of his work with that of all other trades and the satisfactory performance of his work. <c 0.5) PRQFF 8367P 7 / REGO .Ns L`T 22, ��� ‘ T. RO L .EXPIRES: DEC. 31, _ ©� • • Page 1of1 Val Henzel - RE: Our counter meeting today From: "Scott Churchill" < monroestreetassociates @earthlink.net> To: "'Val Henzel "' <Val @tigard- or. gov> Date: 12/14/2006 7:37 PM Subject: RE: Our counter meeting today CC: "'Bill Reed " <breed @elitecare.com >, "'Mark Reed" <Reed @stdairy.com >, <CPMARCH@aol.com >, "'Scott Churchill" <monroestreetassociates @earthlink.net> Val, Per our counter meeting today, what you need to clear your part of the Plan Check process for the Grant Street Elite Care Project is the following: 1) Two sets of complete Architectural and Engineering documents completely updated, cross - referenced for consistent coordination, and wet signed by architect and engineer. 2) Engineering documents submitted by Rowell to Miller Engineering including all calculations to be formatted on 24" x 36" sheets to match the remainder of the set of Permit Documents and have those document included in the submission of the two updated sets. You will then send the sets to Miller for their processing stamp and sign -off. When that set is signed and returned to you from Miller, you will then be able to issue your approval and sign -off. That will clear your portion of the Plan Check Process. You also mentioned that Emily Eng (Planner assigned to the project from Planning) has not signed off on the Planning Portion of the Review. That needs to take place before the permit is issued. I believe that Lilly from Bill Reed's office is managing those issues at this point. You also mentioned that Engineering has not issued their approval for issuance of the Building Permit. Thank you for giving me the name of the Engineer now assigned to the Project... Kim McMillan. I will contact them to see what it will take to get their approval so as not to hold up the permit in that department. Please let me know via email if this is your understanding as well. Regards, Scott Churchill (503) 929 9138 file: / /C:\Documents and Settings \val.000\Local Settings \Temp \GW }00002.HTM 12/18/2006 Page l of 1 Val Henzel - Fwd: Grant street Elite Care - BUP2006-00053 review response #7 From: Val Henzel To: VanDomelen, Mark Date: 2/5 /2007 9:02 AM Subject: Fwd: Grant street Elite Care - BUP2006 -00053 review response #7 Val Henzel Senior Plans Examiner 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 718 -2436 val @tigard - or.gov »> Val Henzel 10/17 10:16 AM »> Thank you for your response. There has been an issue created on the interior stairway landing sheet A2.2. Please see review doc. attached. Thank you in advance for you response in this. Val Henzel Senior Plans Examiner 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 718 -2436 val @tigard - or.gov file: / /C: \Documents and Settings \val.000\Local Settings \Temp \GW }00001.HTM 2/5/2007 Lyal Henze! bup06 -00053 R7 Elite Care.doc _ - Page 1 } October 17, 2006 Elite Care Bill Reed 2300 SW 103r Portland, OR 97225 RE: GRANT STREET ELITE CARE - NEW BUILDING — REVIEW #7 Project Information Building Permit: BUP2006 -00053 Construction Type: V -A Tenant Name: Grant Street Elite Care Occupancy Type: SR -1 Address: 12353 SW Grant St. Occupant Load: 394 Area: 31,279 sq ft Stories: 3 The plan review was performed under the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC) 2004 edition; and the State of Oregon Fire Code (OFC) 2004 edition. For better clarity I have removed issues that have been resolved. Please provide the following information in order to complete the review. Note (First request April 5, 2006, 2n" 6/30/06, 3rd 8/9/06, 4°" 8/28/06, 5"' 9/15/06, 6th 10/10/06, 10/17/06) STRUCTURAL 1. The structural review was completed by Miller Consulting. The plan review dated January 16, 2006, was E- Mailed to Afghan Associates for response (review doc. attached). RESPONSE RECEIVED 8/14/06 sent structural to Miller for review —** 9/15/06 - Ray Miller spoke with Todd Rowell on 8/16/06, on the requirements to meet the irregular building requirements and not being able to use the simplified analysis approach per 1616.61, 1617.5 has to be designed per sec 1620.2.3 requirements. Therefore, they stated they will be submitting new structural calcs and design complying with chapter 16. FIRE LIFE- SAFETY - Please provide the following; Revise stairway landing to comply with code requirement as stated below. B. On sheet A2.2 the interior stair has been reduced 7" as was submitted from prior plan and now has the issue of the door swinging over the landing and reducing landing past what is allowed per 1009.4 exception 2. Stairway landings. There shall be a floor or landing at the top and bottom of each stairway. The width of landings shall not be less than the width of stairways they serve. Every landing shall have a minimum dimension measured in the direction of travel equal to the width of the stairway. Such dimension need not exceed 48 inches where the stairway has a straight run. Exceptions: # 2. Doors opening onto a landing shall not reduce the landing to less than one -half the required width. Val Herizel - bup06 _00053 R7 Elite Care.doc Page 2 When fully open, the door shall not project more than 7 inches into a landing. Please address the handrail extension issue now created 1009.11.5 "handrails shall extend horizontally at least 12 inches (305 mm) beyond the top riser and continue to slope for the depth of one tread beyond the bottom riser." **New remark *8/9/06 - A. Gates at 2" floor exit stairway obstruct landing more than 1/2 distance per 1009.4 revise Stairway landings. RESPONSE ACCEPTED 10/17/06 — Thank you for your response in resolving this issue. 16. Egress path and occupant load 1004, 1013, 1014 (The construction documents shall show in sufficient detail the location, construction, size and character of all portions of the means of egress in compliance with the provisions of this code. The construction documents shall designate the number of occupants to be accommodated on every floor, and in all rooms and spaces. 106.1.2) E. Access discharge at exit court 1023 RESPONSE ACCEPTED 10/17/06 - Thank you for your response in resolving this issue. NOT PART OF THIS REVIEW: • Electrical, Fire Sprinklers, Fire Alarms, Mechanical System, Site, & Plumbing When submitting revised drawings or additional information, please attach a copy of the enclosed City of Tigard, Letter of Transmittal. The letter of transmittal assists the City of Tigard in tracking and processing the documents. Respectfully, Val Henzel, Senior Plans Examiner 1 Page 1 of 2 Val Henzel - RE: Status on Plan Check for Elite Care - Grant Street Tigard From: "Scott Churchill" < monroestreetassociates @earthlink.net> To: "'Val Henzel "' <Val @tigard- or.gov> Date: 12/6/2006 11:33 AM Subject: RE: Status on Plan Check for Elite Care - Grant Street Tigard CC: <CPMARCH @aol.com >, "'Mark Reed " <Reed @stdairy.com >, "'Bill Reed" <breed @elitecare.com >, <brianb @tigard- or.gov >, "'Scott Churchill" <monroestreetassoci ates @earthlink. net> Val, Thank you for the status update. We will work on getting you sets which incorporate these Changes. Regards, Scott Churchill Original Message From: Val Henzel [mailto:Val @tigard- or.gov] Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 9:44 AM To: monroestreetassociates @earthlink.net Cc: CPMARCH @aol.com; Reed @stdairy.com; Brian Blalock Subject: RE: Status on Plan Check for Elite Care - Grant Street Tigard Scott, I have received Ray millers review document response dated 12/1/06 and it shows all issued resolved with item 14 stating deferred submittal information and item 15 stating submittal of 4 complete sets of plans, we only need 2 complete sets of plans submitted incorporating resolutions of all issues as noted on my review and Rays. At this time no plans have been submitted to this office addressing these completed plans. Val Henzel Senior Plans Examiner 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 718 -2436 val@ tigard- or.gov »> "Scott Churchill" < monroestreetassociates @earthlink.net> 12/05 11:33 AM »> Val, My understanding is that now that Ray Miller is back from vacation....and he and our Structural Engineers, Rowell Engineering have resolved all of the remaining concerns about the building. Those revised plans have been sent to you directly as well as Miller Engineering. file: / /C:\Documents and Settings \val.000\Local Settings \Temp \GW }00002.HTM 12/7/2006 Page 2 of 2 Can you please confirm that this is your understanding as well...? We look forward to completion of this last piece of the Plan Check process. Regards, Scott Churchill (503) 929 9138 file: / /C:\Documents and Settings \va1.000\Local Settings \Temp \GW }00002.HTM 12/7/2006 Page 1 of 1 Val Henzel - RE: Status on Plan Check for Elite Care - Grant Street Tigard From: Val Henzel To: Churchill, Scott Date: 12/6/2006 9:44 AM Subject: RE: Status on Plan Check for Elite Care - Grant Street Tigard CC: Blalock, Brian; CPMARCH @aol.com; Reed', 'Mark Scott, I have received Ray millers review document response dated 12/1/06 and it shows all issued resolved with item 14 stating deferred submittal information and item 15 stating submittal of 4 complete sets of plans, we only need 2 complete sets of plans submitted incorporating resolutions of all issues as noted on my review and Rays. At this time no plans have been submitted to this office addressing these completed plans. Val Henzel Senior Plans Examiner 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 718 -2436 val @tigard- or.gov »> "Scott Churchill" < monroestreetassociates @earthlink.net> 12/05 11:33 AM »> Val, My understanding is that now that Ray Miller is back from vacation....and he and our Structural Engineers, Rowell Engineering have resolved all of the remaining concerns about the building. Those revised plans have been sent to you directly as well as Miller Engineering. Can you please confirm that this is your understanding as well...? We look forward to completion of this last piece of the Plan Check process. Regards, Scott Churchill (503) 929 9138 file: / /C:\Documents and Settings \val.000\Local Settings \Temp \GW }00001.HTM 12/6/2006 , October 17, 2006 Q, ff f(1 Elite Care Bill Reed 2300 SW 103` Portland, OR 97225 RE: GRANT STREET ELITE CARE - NEW BUILDING — REVIEW #7 Project Information Building Permit: BUP2006 -00053 Construction Type: V -A Tenant Name: Grant Street Elite Care Occupancy Type: SR -1 Address: 12353 SW Grant St. Occupant Load: 394 Area: 31,279 ft Stories: 3 The plan review was performed under the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC) 2004 edition; and the State of Oregon Fire Code (OFC) 2004 edition. For better clarity I have removed issues that have been resolved. Please provide the following information in order to complete the review. Note (First request April 5, 2006, 2nd 6/30/06, 3rd 8/9/06, 4th 8/28/06, 5th 9/15/06, 6th 10/10/06, 10/17/06) STRUCTURAL 1. The structural review was completed by Miller Consulting. The plan review dated January 16, 2006, was E- Mailed to Afghan Associates for response (review doc. attached). RESPONSE RECEIVED 8/14/06 sent structural to Miller for review —'* 9/15/06 - Ray Miller spoke with Todd Rowell on 8/16/06, on the requirements to meet the irregular building requirements and not being able to use the simplified analysis approach per 1616.61, 1617.5 has to be designed per sec 1620.2.3 requirements. Therefore, they stated they will be submitting new structural calcs and design complying with chapter 16. FIRE LIFE - SAFETY - Please provide the following, Revise stairway landing to comply with code requirement as stated below. B. On sheet A2.2 the interior stair has been reduced 7" as was submitted from prior plan and now has the issue of the door swinging over the landing and reducing landing past what is allowed per 1009.4 exception 2 and handrail extension needs to comply with 1009.11.5. Stairway landings. There shall be a floor or landing at the top and bottom of each stairway. The width of landings shall not be less than the width of stairways they serve. Every landing shall have a minimum dimension measured in the direction of travel equal to the width of the stairway. Such dimension need not exceed 48 inches where the stairway has a straight run. Exceptions: # 2. Doors opening onto a landing shall not reduce the landing to less than one -half the required width. When fully open, the door shall not project more than 7 inches into a landing. Please address the handrail extension issue now created 1009.11.5 "handrails shall extend horizontally at least 12 inches (305 mm) beyond the top riser and continue to slope for the depth of one tread beyond the bottom riser." **New remark *8 /9/06 - A. Gates at 2 floor exit stairway obstruct landing more than 1 /2 distance per 1009.4 revise Stairway landings. RESPONSE ACCEPTED 10/17/06 — Thank you for your response in resolving this issue. 16. Egress path and occupant load 1004, 1013, 1014 (The construction documents shall show in sufficient detail the location, construction, size and character of all portions of the means of egress in compliance with the provisions of this code. The construction documents shall designate the number of occupants to be accommodated on every floor, and in all rooms and spaces. 106.1.2) E. Access discharge at exit court 1023 RESPONSE ACCEPTED 10/17/06 - Thank you for your response in resolving this issue. NOT PART OF THIS REVIEW: • Electrical, Fire Sprinklers, Fire Alarms, Mechanical System, Site, & Plumbing When submitting revised drawings or additional information, please attach a copy of the enclosed City of Tigard, Letter of Transmittal. The letter of transmittal assists the City of Tigard in tracking and processing the documents. Respectfully, Val Henzel, Senior Plans Examiner Page 1of1 Val Henzel - Grant street Elite Care - BUP2006 -00053 review response #7 From: Val Henzel To: Reed', 'Bill; Reed, Mark; scott Date: 10/17/2006 10:16 AM Subject: Grant street Elite Care - BUP2006 -00053 review response #7 Thank you for your response. There has been an issue created on the interior stairway landing sheet A2.2. Please see review doc. attached. Thank you in advance for you response in this. Val Henzel Senior Plans Examiner 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 718 -2436 val @tigard- or.gov file: / /C:\Documents and Settings \val.000\Local Settings \Temp \GW }00001.HTM 10/17/2006 Page 1 of 1 Val Henzel - Fwd: FW: Elite Care Extended Family Residence From: Val Henzel To: Churchill, Scott; Reed', 'Bill; Reed, Mark Date: 11/2/2006 2:33 PM Subject: Fwd: FW: Elite Care Extended Family Residence Please review and reply. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Val Henzel Senior Plans Examiner 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 718 -2436 val @tigard- or.gov »> Brian Blalock 11/02 2:18 PM »> file: / /C:\Documents and Settings \val.000\Local Settings \Temp \GW)00001.HTM 11/2/2006 FW: Elite Care Extended Family Residence Page 1 of 2 Val Henzel - Fwd: FW: Elite Care Extended Family Residence From: Brian Blalock To: Val Henzel Date: 11/2/2006 2:18 PM Subject: Fwd: FW: Elite Care Extended Family Residence Heidi McGreal Administrative Assistant Miller Consulting Engineers, Inc. 9570 SW Barbur Blvd., Suite 100 Portland, Oregon 97219 Phone: (503) 246 -1250 Fax: (503) 246 -1395 EMAIL: heidi @millerengrs.com Web: www.millerengrs.com Original Message From: Heidi McGreal Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 3:41 PM To: 'Brian Blalock (brianb @tigard- or.gov)' Subject: Elite Care Extended Family Residence Mr. Blalock, at Ray Miller's request, attached is Structural Plan Review #2 for the above - referenced project. Please be aware of the note for item #13 listed in the comments section. As always, if you have any questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely, «Plancheck #2_11- 1- 06.pdf» Heidi McGreal Administrative Assistant Miller Consulting Engineers, Inc. 9570 SW Barbur Blvd., Suite 100 file: //C : \Documents and Settings \val.000\Local Settings \Temp \GW }00001.HTM 11/2/2006 FW: Elite Care Extended Family Residence Page 2 of 2 Portland, Oregon 97219 Phone: (503) 246 -1250 Fax: (503) 246 -1395 EMAIL: heidi c[D.millerengrs.com Web: www.millerenqrs.com file: / /C: \Documents and Settings \val.000\Local Settings \Temp \GW }00001.HTM 11/2/2006 ntRa April 13, 2006 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Elite Care lb Bill Reed 2300 SW 103` Portland, OR 97225 RE: GRANT STREET ELI lE CARE - NEW BUILDING - REVIEW Project Information Building Permit: BUP2006 -00053 Construction Type: V -A Tenant Name: Grant Street Elite Care Occupancy Type: SR -1 Address: 12353 SW Grant St. Dear Mr. Reed, After further discussion with the structural engineer reviewing the project the City of Tigard is requiring drawings and calculations that depict the entire structure. The submitted drawings only show half of the structure which is not acceptable per section 106.1.1 OSSC. Please provide 2 copies with full size sheets of the entire structure for review. • Please address as many of the plan review items detailed on the attached plan review letters prior to resubmitting the new drawings in order to expedite the review process. When submitting revised drawings or additional information, please attach a copy of the enclosed City of Tigard, Letter of Transmittal. The letter of transmittal assists the City of Tigard in tracking and proc a ing the documents. Respect , Brian Nock. ✓ Pla9s Supervisor • 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 5 Vc-TU RAL FILE COPY March 27, 2006 Miller Consulting Engineers 9570 Barbur Boulevard Portland, OR 97219 RE: PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT Project Information Building Permit: BUP2006 -00053 Occupancy Type: SR -1 Tenant Name: Grant Street Elite Care Construction Type: VA Address: 12353 SW Grant Street Occupant Load: NA To whom it may concern, Please review the accompanying structural plans for the construction of a new residential care facility. The project is to be reviewed under the current Oregon Structural Specialty Code. Enclosed are full size Architectural /Structural drawings, Beam Calculations and a Lateral Analysis. Assess fees per the Personal Service Contract based on structural review fees. (See attached permit application.) Please contact the applicant for review questions @ Bill Reed 2300 SW 103` Portland, OR 97225 • If you need additional information please call me at 503- 718 -2759. Respectfully, Brian Blalock, Plans Examination Supervisor • � 4 :,'S 4s f ,�.,) -/w . �i �1� oC , � a.J , 10 )9.3,e - s Ap606 •Loc, �. r , - ,A) �. � � 'Jj- / s � �., , "/ ))'fY) 47(.9- 1.60 vtre\GD f,c).7°11C 1 314 pit 0 , 1 4"-v-0-0-1097/4 a p :.a /rrl ? `S up _ - r � 5V Cr a 'A , �' ' (' ' p' 1 kicv - 'P h .,qeo S \ , a� sA rta ,.o� -ouA /i�5 1`'92` ' 'rrrri at S'Cv u7,ao llrpry7 .a 0:-*(3 »2-i'» 'row E'*QL "T- '�1° stit - o Ax e , �Q■ A latoo ,. 5,,'9C •(- 4P - Aca-y Vit 110 9 ).(19. - Act a‘i - 9 0+ ;IA wrel _ _ u � 17 /f Q£ ss �'e 4-4'Ao tee° 'a.J +no n.Ai(}, s \ v'M t.4t( / a) �u 4 , 4 _, oU i Q 'NIL_ 'Po os fo, 21..4s s A o\l' 7 ) , t 4_ . aasa� - ,S L• _. ,� al r o f '' "' 3/'S p�9s 51D .�G ° 1 1 \ c -1 ) I t 12:9 P 63 4 ) rA 6\\ e (S &/' <() - > - ciD 773 ' 7 ' ,Pe\>tv S) uk 026c 3 1 /,/,S (260 3, A g X03, (� .92 V :i.44/ cry -,.-5 S-6 1 " / ° I Me ritie prtrgede, S4 I . s /' � p s � p o'er t p / J io / deirnpi r - - gAc elocA S er m n /Lc r `j /)e P/4 l 3 757.2. /0 . I, . 0 C. 5r, (47. - - ,97 d22 t sue) Se�o� • - - _ i� d S'urwv r-‹ - k1 e m.e,retzyek4 n n ` p par - toc �� l rr4- '° __ .9.c&sS a t X - r-1 :Z,A -1 dr , V . 3 �� /1.. /IN 04 , 5 b s7Oc , , l l Qo tzi o v� a 'n oo lb/0'959 o u0 • , _�, � sou 02 A/7142 i ' 'iv )=' b .4 " Sat o a �' s-)-Q0 "e 14 1 pit1� , S,(7a (4 ) 1 2=-• sl pni) Pel 03m 1 . z ) ° -27 Ma . litri/S (7(2A3) - A s Jcipm, 7 TA& 4/ /5 ( ' .9 1,11 .3 I'Srol -.... - A - -, - - y;,,T :is -x r " l .A r/ 4 / Pi ?' TA ---1- 1/ 1 5, 5 ""/ V 'l liv i "24 ' , f 11 7 " I . rui77 c - % P 6 0 9 / I „eL -- 9 7 D7 ot - vYkpfl -- •*- 041 -44 - " 4 -s --1-9pudiord 7S /3 I'C'aoi S 0,Do oc • M� I "" NrY1 " --4 , 11 1 46 • R - . J �. . • bra, ''-��_ �" — ` Page 1 of 1 Val Henzel - RE: Status on Plan Check for Elite Care - Grant Street Tigard From: Val Henzel To: Churchill, Scott Date: 12/6/2006 9:44 AM Subject: RE: Status on Plan Check for Elite Care - Grant Street Tigard CC: Blalock, Brian; CPMARCH @aol.com; Reed', 'Mark Scott, I have received Ray millers review document response dated 12/1/06 and it shows all issued resolved with item 14 stating deferred submittal information and item 15 stating submittal of 4 complete sets of plans, we only need 2 complete sets of plans submitted incorporating resolutions of all issues as noted on my review and Rays. At this time no plans have been submitted to this office addressing these completed plans. Val Henzel Senior Plans Examiner 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 718 -2436 val @tigard- or.gov »> "Scott Churchill" < monroestreetassociates @earthlink.net> 12/05 11:33 AM »> Val, My understanding is that now that Ray Miller is back from vacation....and he and our Structural Engineers, Rowell Engineering have resolved all of the remaining concerns about the building. Those revised plans have been sent to you directly as well as Miller Engineering. Can you please confirm that this is your understanding as well...? We look forward to completion of this last piece of the Plan Check process. Regards, Scott Churchill (503) 929 9138 file: / /C:\Documents and Settings \val.000\Local Settings \Temp \GW }00001.HTM 12/6/2006 October 17, 2006 Elite Care Bill Reed 2300 SW 103` Portland, OR 97225 RE: GRANT STREET ELITE CARE - NEW BUILDING — REVIEW #7 Project Information Building Permit: BUP2006 -00053 Construction Type: V -A Tenant Name: Grant Street Elite Care Occupancy Type: SR -1 Address: 12353 SW Grant St. Occupant Load: 394 Area: 31,279 sq ft Stories: 3 The plan review was performed under the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC) 2004 edition; and the State of Oregon Fire Code (OFC) 2004 edition. For better clarity I have removed issues that have been resolved. Please provide the following information in order to complete the review. Note (First request April 5, 2006, 2ad 6/30/06, 3rd 8/9/06, 4th 8/28/06, 5th 9/15/06, 6th 10/10/06, 10/17/06) STRUCTURAL 1. The structural review was completed by Miller Consulting. The plan review dated January 16, 2006, was E- Mailed to Afghan Associates for response (review doc. attached). RESPONSE RECEIVED 8/14/06 sent structural to Miller for review — ** 9/15/06 - Ray Miller spoke with Todd Rowell on 8/16/06, on the requirements to meet the irregular building requirements and not being able to use the simplified analysis approach per 1616.61, 1617.5 has to be designed per sec 1620.2.3 requirements. Therefore, they stated they will be submitting new structural calcs and design complying with chapter 16. FIRE LIFE - SAFETY - Please provide the following; Revise stairway landing to comply with code requirement as stated below. B. On sheet A2.2 the interior stair has been reduced 7" as was submitted from prior plan and now ' I has the issue of the door swinging over the landing and reducing landing past what is allowed per 1009.4 exception 2. Stairway landings. There shall be a floor or landing at the top and bottom of each stairway. The width of landings shall not be less than the width of stairways they serve. Every landing shall have a minimum dimension measured in the direction of travel equal to the width of the stairway. Such dimension need not exceed 48 inches where the stairway has a straight run. Exceptions: # 2. Doors opening onto a landing shall not reduce the landing to less than one -half the required width. When fully open, the door shall not project more than 7 inches into a landing. Please address the handrail extension issue now created 1- 1009.11.5 "handrails shall extend horizontally at least 12 inches (305 mm) beyond the top riser and continue to slope for the depth of one tread beyond the bottom riser." * *New remark *8/9/06 - ' A. Gates at 2 ❑ floor exit stairway obstruct landing more than 1/2 distance per 1009.4 revise Stairway landings. RESPONSE ACCEPTED 10/17 /06 — Thank you for your response in resolving this issue. 16. Egress path and occupant load 1004, 1013, 1014 (The construction documents shall show in sufficient detail the location, construction, sitie and character of all portions of the means of egress in compliance with the provisions of this code. The construction documents shall designate the number of occupants to be accommodated on every floor, and in all rooms and spaces. 106.1.2) E. Access discharge at exit court 1023 RESPONSE ACCEPTED 10/17/06 - Thank you for your response in resolving this issue. NOT PART OF THIS REVIEW: • Electrical, Fire Sprinklers, Fire Alarms, Mechanical System, Site, & Plumbing When submitting revised drawings or additional information, please attach a copy of the enclosed City of Tigard, Letter of Transmittal. The letter of transmittal assists the City of Tigard in tracking and processing the documents. Respectfully, Val Henzel, Senior Plans Examiner rage i or i Val Henzel - RE: Our counter meeting today From: "Scott Churchill" <monroestreetassociates @earthlink.net> - To: "'Val Henzel"' <Val @tigard- or.gov> Date: 12/14/2006 7:37 PM Subject: RE: Our counter meeting today CC: "'Bill Reed" <breed @elitecare.com >, "'Mark Reed ' <Reed @stdairy.com >, <CPMARCH @aol.com >, "'Scott Churchill ' < monroestreetassociates @earthlink.net> Val, Per our counter meeting today, what you need to clear your part of the Plan Check process for the Grant Street Elite Care Project is the following: 1) Two sets of complete Architectural and Engineering documents completely updated, cross - referenced for consistent coordination, and wet signed by architect and engineer. 2) Engineering documents submitted by Rowell to Miller Engineering including all calculations to be formatted on 24" x 36" sheets to match the remainder of the set of Permit Documents and have those document included in the submission of the two updated sets. You will then send the sets to Miller for their processing stamp and sign -off. When that set is signed and returned to you from Miller, you will then be able to issue your approval and sign -off. That will clear your portion of the Plan Check Process. You also mentioned that Emily Eng (Planner assigned to the project from Planning) has not signed off on the Planning Portion of the Review. That needs to take place before the permit is issued. I believe that Lilly from Bill Reed's office is managing those issues at this point. You also mentioned that Engineering has not issued their approval for issuance of the Building Permit. Thank you for giving me the name of the Engineer now assigned to the Project... Kim McMillan. I will contact them to see what it will take to get their approval so as not to hold up the permit in that department. Please let me know via email if this is your understanding as well. Regards, Scott Churchill (503) 929 9138 file: / /C:\Documents and Settings \va1.000\Local Settings \Temp \GW }00002.HTM 12/18/2006 rage i or 2,, Val Henzel - RE: Status on Plan Check for Elite Care - Grant Street Tigard From: "Scott Churchill" < monroestreetassociates @earthlink.net> - To: "'Val Henzel "' <Val @tigard - or.gov> Date: 12/6/2006 11:33 AM Subject: RE: Status on Plan Check for Elite Care - Grant Street Tigard CC: <CPMARCH @aol.com >, "'Mark Reed" <Reed @stdairy.com >, "'Bill Reed" <breed @elitecare.com >, <brianb @tigard- or.gov >, "'Scott Churchill ' < monroestreetassociates @ earthlink.net> Val, Thank you for the status update. We will work on getting you sets which incorporate these Changes. Regards, Scott Churchill Original Message From: Val Henzel [mailto:Val @tigard - or.gov] Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 9:44 AM To: monroestreetassociates @earthlink.net Cc: CPMARCH @aol.com; Reed @stdairy.com; Brian Blalock Subject: RE: Status on Plan Check for Elite Care - Grant Street Tigard Scott, I have received Ray millers review document response dated 12/1/06 and it shows all issued resolved with item 14 stating deferred submittal information and item 15 stating submittal of 4 complete sets of plans, we only need 2 complete sets of plans submitted incorporating resolutions of all issues as noted on my review and Rays. At this time no plans have been submitted to this office addressing these completed plans. Val Henzel Senior Plans Examiner 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 718 -2436 val a@tigard or.gov »> "Scott Churchill" < monroestreetassociates @ earthlink.net> 12/05 11:33 AM »> Val, My understanding is that now that Ray Miller is back from vacation....and he and our Structural Engineers, Rowell Engineering have resolved all of the remaining concerns about the building. Those revised plans have been sent to you directly as well as Miller Engineering. file: //C :\Documents and Settings \val.000\Local Settings \Temp \GW }00002.HTM 12/7/2006 rage L, uiL Can you please confirm that this is your understanding as well...? We look forward to completion of this last piece of the Plan Check process. Regards, Scott Churchill (503) 929 9138 file: / /C:\Documents and Settings \val.000\Local Settings \Temp \GW }00002.HTM 12/7/2006 r • Val Henzel - RE: Status on Plan Check for Elite Care - Grant Street Tigard From: Val Henzel To: Churchill, Scott Date: 12/6/2006 9:44 AM Subject: RE: Status on Plan Check for Elite Care - Grant Street Tigard CC: Blalock, Brian; CPMARCH @aol.com; Reed', 'Mark Scott, I have received Ray millers review document response dated 12/1/06 and it shows all issued resolved with item 14 stating deferred submittal information and item 15 stating submittal of 4 complete sets of plans, we only need 2 complete sets of plans submitted incorporating resolutions of all issues as noted on my review and Rays. At this time no plans have been submitted to this office addressing these completed plans. Val Henzel Senior Plans Examiner 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 718 -2436 val @tigard- or.gov »> "Scott Churchill" < monroestreetassociates @earthlink.net> 12/05 11:33 AM »> Val, My understanding is that now that Ray Miller is back from vacation....and he and our Structural Engineers, Rowell Engineering have resolved all of the remaining concerns about the building. Those revised plans have been sent to you directly as well as Miller Engineering. Can you please confirm that this is your understanding as well...? We look forward to completion of this last piece of the Plan Check process. Regards, Scott Churchill (503) 929 9138 file: / /C:\Documents and Settings \val.000\Local Settings \Temp \GW }00001.HTM 12/6/2006 Mark VanDomelen - TEXT.htm Page 1 Val Henzel Senior Plans Examiner 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 718 -2436 valgtigard -or. gov »> Val Henzel 01/31 11:25 AM »> Scott, It was good talking with you also. I would like to set up a meeting with you and Craig to go through the plans so you can see what and why I am asking for clarity. Friday after 1 PM or any time Monday will work for me please let me know what is best for you. Thank you in advance for your assistance in this. Val Val Henzel Senior Plans Examiner 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 718-2436 vala,tigard- or.gov »> "Scott Churchill" < monroestreetassociates @earthlink.net> 01/31 9:23 AM »> Val, It was good talking with you yesterday about the status of the Documents for The Grant Street Project. Per our discussion, you will be issuing a formal list of final items To Craig and myself so that we can execute the necessary changes. The list will come in the form that we have done in the past[) . Mark VanDomelen - TEXT.htm Page 2 I A clear checklist so that there is no confusion on the remaining items. Per our agreement, as soon as the list is issued I will review it with Craig, pull the two sets of documents, make the necessary changes Complete documentation for us of those changes and re- submit Those modified documents. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Regards, Scott Churchill (503) 929 9138 10570 SE Washington Street p �� r � n n � n � n � n Suite 210 / °�D W LEL�L� EN§ONEEREIIR Lg DD En f1 IIN LC�o Portland, OR 97216 CIVIL — STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Tel. 503-254-6292 Fax 503 - 254 -6761 August 9, 2006 R, Project: Elite Care Extended Family Residence AUG 11 2U06 12345 SW Grant St. Tigard, Oregon 97223 PUTT Summary of Lateral Engineering Revisions: -� The engineering for the project residence has been revised from the originally submitted engineering to reflect some plan changes. After a phone conversation with Miller Engineering, code sections 1620.4.1 and 1620.2.9 have been reviewed for plan irregularities. The code boundary nailing requirements of the horizontal diaphragms on the project structure are adequate to resist a 25% increase in load. The L50 clip spacing stated in Note 5 of the shearwall schedule provides the required load transfer to the shearwall. Some of the shearwall nailing requirements have been increased to ensure that the proper L50 spacing is followed when diaphragm loads are increased 25 %. Horizontal MST48 straps have been added on the second floor plan at the re- entrant corners. Special seismic load combination calculations have been added for the beam under the Living /Solarium wall. This beam supports live, dead, and seismic uplift loads. The beam is to be revised to a 6 3 /4x 15 GLB. Respectfully submitted, vl Vt.el Todd Rowell PE •F� +P F ::, o Orego ... .._ . Department of Human Services e s y Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor � De . Health Services � Facilities Planning and Safety 4 2006 . E,. 3420 Cherry Avenue NE, Suite 110 y 006 0 Keizer, OR 97303 4. Ma `� �' (503) 373 -7201 �Py -c,\:. � Fax (503) 373 -0313 �t O �, �� )( bHS Craig Monaghan Oregon Department of Human Services Architect 13588 S.W. Marcia Drive Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT REVIEW FOR: FACILITY: ELITE CARE CORP, GRANT ST. RCF, TIGARD PR #: 01 -76 PROJECT: 24 UNITS RCF Dear Craig: Construction documents for the above noted project have been reviewed by this office in cooperation with Health Services. The following is a checklist of comments included with this correspondence: ✓ Fire & Life Safety Comments for Conformance to the NFPA 101 Code /Medicare and Medicaid Rules ✓ Architectural Comments/ Licensure Rules *OAR 333 - 055 -0010 Administrative Rules for Residential Care Facilities Mechanical /Electrical comments to come under separate cover letter. Note that plans approval by a local building code jurisdiction does not signify approval for the NFPA 101 Code mandated for Medicare/Medicaid Certification and JCAHO Accreditation. The Deputy State Fire Marshal having jurisdiction may have additional comments related to compliance and will address those comments to you separately. You are required to submit a written plan of corrections fully describing the solutions chosen for resolution of each review comment. If major revisions are required, revised plans for affected portions of the project may also be necessary. Please also provide one copy of all plans of corrections to the Deputy State Fire Marshal, Paul Nees. A "Notice of Construction Plans Approval" will be issued by Facilities Planning and Safety when all licensure issues have been satisfactorily resolved. Also included will be a HSS 1400 (11/03) I "Notice of Substantial Completion "form for use in notifying reviewing agencies at the completion of project construction prior to occupying a project. Construction prior to receiving all review comments and the successful resolution of all these comments is highly discouraged and could result in costly modifications or disapprovals after construction. While submission of project change orders is not usually required, modifications which substantially affect compliance or add to the scope of the project must be submitted. If you have questions regarding this review, please contact me at (503) 373 -7201 or (503) 373 -7197. Respectfully, V i Robert F. Losch Health Facilities Consultant FACILITIES PLANNING & SAFETY RFL:djs Enclosures cc: William C. Reed, ELITE CARE CORP., Project Contact Paul Nees, Oregon State Deputy Fire Marshal Gary Lampella, City of Tigard Building Official Allison McKenzie, SENIORS & PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES FACILITY ELITE CARE CORP., GRANT ST. RCF, TIGARD PR #: 01 -76 PROJECT 24 UNITS RCF STATE OF OREGON 2004 STRUCTURAL SPECIALTY CODE AMENDMENTS BASED ON THE 2003 IBC SR -1 BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS (FoR ALF & RCF FACILITIES) Schematic Review X Construction Review .. ;.X��' N ��V.: r.i:�:t { >: �:�RY n'•"'i;: :f: `:i: a? : y __. � Xns . , i�'�"v =�7''��' i•: - e� . , -ix"YS7` 'ii . V':sc'r � .. a i-� i' ,. .. r .,, ... r.,.. ,,. <' !. %tai 'C, s��;` •e �_ .OAR R .......... .,r.,. ,;: .;�:;. �" ULE, :.. . S ECTION .. . ........... � , ,:... .:.�.:, .. ,•:, ..:::_ � - �_:� t�;�. :�, . ,•, YES' N� 1. Appendix SR 103.2, The 2000 Edition of NFPA 101, Chapter 32 & Section 3.3.56 & the 2001 Edition of NFPA 101A, Ch. 6. Occupancy Classification: �( SR -1 (Slow, 3 -13 minute evacuation time, based upon NFPA Standards of the 101 Life Safety Code and NFPA IOTA or a program of timed evacuation drills) for more than 16 residents. Evacuation capability is the responsibility of licensing agencies. The approval for the proposed occupancy is the authority of the building official. 2. Table 503, Allowable Construction Type, Area and Height Proposed Construction Type & Size: ? ■ Verify Const: V -A Area: 25,252 Height: 3 Stories 30' (SR -1 SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS I -1 OCCUPANCY) 3. Section 506 & SR 105.2 Area Increases: • Provide calc's per Sec. (Height increases otherwise allowed for 506.1 & 506.2 OSSC. sprinklers are not permitted for SR -1 occupancies of Type IIB, III, IV or V. construction.) Total Area: -1- ,'? "ti :.ir;;:wr' :ii:"^",- "'ti• ':F; N';t { x « a,.:a,,:: t cas= t. . ,av :, ai' rs+s;n';'.tm =�5?, :Y ;r'v i : : , .... . . :a,, `�" r .f ^ia :,,,. - .... r: =•;::: ,� <4, .. ,. ,,...,._... u.,.,. � .: e"r�. .... .• ., ..•?'nnm� ., a .,,, .., r:;t„ :s�. - .... :::, .: +;::;�" , - r�•:. •. ?• 5::: .. ±, ,..r w:?� . :� :,.f• �. {'. ,.s. � ' irC�ae.;,: 7� �r�s - frwtzi• <�a �: - _• a ":e•:�,. .., ,. _. .:::.•,,..,;::,, r,.:`",. i ;:.• .,m- . -..... ��/ :,. .,..,.r , +5'�` ,. : _p . s� ,3r �'M ��•-:. ,, i. .......,... �.,.•:... -- v....,. �,. _._.,.,.., ck. ,., ,.�,,;,, � � CO .,. ..a!aa,...., r ...,, .: :.. a...„ �:, .•_.. c;?`;'iT "rs- ».i`�';i»;.. _ .1, ,N ss:' ::;•xm:st " ;.w � � ' . °: 53�# C .,> ,a, _ % ?'' ',.• . s', =�' u ' ate z" : j . : ' '� � ,�. _s� - .. _. ., ., . _,.:: ',.. .,.. s . ... ... ........ ..,_ ,, :�,..,. ., .: -.., •kr ,.# s•.e3.. `: .. . ..... :: •.,..•.�, _ rta_.. .. y ,_. . ....� ::,.. ....• � »..:. -. .,- e,..., '., ' ,Y f yY:.. ,af:M.,it ., q .. r 4. Chapter 10 & SR 108 .� °....__.. : ,_ Means �.,.__ ......�...�w "� « : of Egress (A) Section 1002 Exit Access: Is that portion of a means X of egress from any location that leads to an exit. Exit Access includes: (B) Section 1013.2 Egress through Intervening Rooms: X Permitted when they are accessory to, are not high- hazard, and they provide a discernable egress. Access shall not pass through rooms that can be locked. (C) Section 1002 & 1013.3 Common Path of Egress Travel: Is NA • that portion of exit access required before two separate and distinct paths of exit are available. Shall not exceed 75'. (D) Section 1013.4 Aisles: Shall be provided from all • Provide equipment portions of an exit access that contains layouts for each floor. seats, tables, furnishings, displays, etc. (E) Section 1013.5 Egress Balconies: Shall conform to the X same requirements as corridors for width, headroom, dead ends and projections. (F) Section 1014.1 & Table 1014.1 Exit Access Doorways: Two exits or X exit access doorways from any space shall be provided when occupant load exceeds 10. (G) Section 1016 & SR 104.2 Corridors: (1) Shall be 1 -HR rated per Table 9 • Verify req. with 1016.1. Building Official. Section SR 104.2 Shall be constructed as a smoke partition * • Conformance required (See Section 710) when corridor is serving more than 10 (ten). Construction is non -rated but continuous to upper floor or roof deck, smoke tight. (H) Section 1005 & SR 108.2.1 Minimum Corridor Width: Shall 9 • Show dedicated paths comply with Section 1005. Corridors of travel for each floor serving residential sleeping areas for occupied on furniture & more than 10 shall be not less than 72 ". equipment layout drawing. -2- _,., . ,.... � ... ......... ... f,.......,....;n. , 1 i"'x , .:..:,�:.. •.: >s'_•i. r:•r,; •ac:;�`�• iai?:. .,t; }�s,3 E.r,.,, d.S`.,.. , 3. • a,_, ,.4: y -:: af, .�i .. ,•.,_,� ., �... ,.., .rr'.,.... ... ,., ,. ,,.•.__.. t - _....,.. <,rr <.= �:r... ,-&..z., s.F ^�`,'�?' ,r: ':`; `.�'`. - .:P ?;:fS "e 'u ...5,. REF . s ..,.... d ..a t. u. , fi ; fi. a•. a:y :. e ° i 2 a� : 7 %e didf;a3 <.i ;..,•>` ... ,,. ,; . , •. ,..,,.,.... •f,.: ., ,,....:.:_�,�z; .,...,,, .... , >:.. _, >,r;,�,. �:�:... t COMPLI'E ' � ,`,�; , �,. � ..: � : , 4 r {s,. <;:: >:•, - �.�.� ,�... a� ��;., .,, �° ,.. �;, D,. �; �C;OIVIMENT'`_ °' °; .,...t ..._u. - i1"-': -::, :r,v ,;., r: &� ^,..:: «...;,,q: ��3_:::,,,.. w• { z _•v.. �,, .,L.. -. ? . , I; . . �, -r, Saj^.,.,..,� "tx. ,...,i :,.,: i:':¢' .. .., :E�!�: �5i' "'5�, `�. ,._sa}�. � � t:.. t . , h ','s fir r „2 {�,'�^z�,,c , ,3;k��• . ^ r ":i:4,: ^t^ ' �� <s za c,3' :�.,�e {.''3.3•i,•, =• .��, 't ;;ant;; , y.:r;^a,� �a '�fi. • °F' ,{ u u '[-- I "''i, �' ` e " « {5 �s �4 xs'� Ek.x 3 ^OAR RrUIE SECTION, x. ,�s.< t �. -, r t' ,,, ;:.. �..... _ ; i ^, ,:i,:x �. „r•.. ,rzs •).;. rz +, i : t r,€i, , ,� _ s • (I) Table 1015.1 Travel Distance: The maximum length of exit access travel, measured from the most remote point within a story to the entrance to an exit, shall not exceed 250'. See Table 1015.1. (J) Section 1016.3 Dead Ends: Corridors required to have two or more exits shall not have dead ends. (Max. 20') (K) SR 104.2.1 Doors in corridors constructed as 9 • If staff is not on the smoke partitions may comply with living unit floor 24/7, then Section 407.3.1, when staff is awake doors will have to be self 24 hrs. on that floor, with fire sprinkler closing, positive latching & fire alarm systems. (Unless they are smoke proof assemblies. an exit or stair door, doors are not required to be rated but do have smoke seals & have positive latching.) (L) SR 104.3.1 & Section 709 Smoke Compartments shall be not NA ► Floor areas do not more than 10,000 sq. ft. or areas exceed 5000 sq. ft. each. having more than 16 residents. Separation is by 1 -HR smoke barrier with 20 min. door or opening ratings. (M) SR 108.2.2 Corridor Continuity: Common living X and dining areas may be open to the corridor when serving less than 50 persons. (N) SR 104.3 Point of Safety: At least one point of X safety shall be provided with a minimum of 10 sq. ft. for each occupant and shall be one of the following: 1) 50' away from the building; 2) a public way, or 3) a protected point in the building. (0) Section 1002 Exit: That portion of an egress system separated from other spaces by fire rated construction and openings that provide a protected path of egress travel between the access and the discharge. -3- �..,:,.F =:i «:..,�'. }! y::%:�s:e?��, <'rY;': f.. "A'ix ii. jt;:: x;:: °i*i >« »:;7::�irtf > :• . _ 1 .. - me ^,: - . '\ w......r•• - :. �.a,..�- �. >M. �,. 3.. �-�„:V.;� a`(.• . :r iSt: _ 'I ∎S M:i '.n r ..-. .. ..:... :_ , �.,...,. r l..: vr. ....... :'. u`+. .'F ^• , ;• _ b ,`� �'icr ."n :.F �s .`. �:4Y ..... .. ...: .....- .:. ,r, ,. , . ,ts ,.. »c •,� +. >N ar:7.�a;:u�. }.?s , r7;..sn.:.�i _ �v » °;uk'` x ;r.��R'_`r... _`�: «:`ta,�.9, ,. � r .. „ ..., ..Y,,�.:•._,:.�:,,,.....:�,u.; �;.,.....a.,- :W .............. «.- :,.':Y <s:��::���; - ::�,:� ��t C OIVI; x COIVIM ENT.:.,t, ,. s��� � i 4 ,'u Sr2 °... ,xy . . .4_r - . �;�`:£_t,3e .',_,'"°7 �',.�.; >s,+; ^;s'•.:S =,,:'� ..t,:;, z+,".:.•:.;.`;: a:: .r,,�. �;: ' Y '� '1 � ..,..7^:' a'u ti,. N A ..�._,._. .IJLEI= ° r�3t:it a,�{ Exits include exterior exit doors at9., ., ground level, exit enclosures, exit passageways, exterior exit stairs and ramps and horizontal exits. (P) Section 1017.1 Required exit protection shall not be ? • Conformance required reduced. (Q) Section 1018.1 All spaces shall have access to the minimum number of exits as required by Table 1018.1. (R) Section 1019.1 Interior exit stairways & ramps shall * be in exit enclosures with fire barriers have a fire- resistance rating of not less than 2 hours for four stories or more and 1 hour when less than four stories. (S) Section 1019.1.1 & 1020.4 Openings and Penetrations in ? ■ Conformance required. enclosures or passageways shall be protected with 90 min. rated openings as req. by Section 715. Openings shall be limited to access to the enclosure and egress from the enclosure. (T) Section 1020.1 Exit Passageways (See Sec. 1020.3): �( Shall be separated from all other spaces by a 2 -HR fire- resistance -rated construction that provides a protected horizontal path to an exit discharge or public way. See Table 706.3.7. Exit passageways shall not be used for any purpose other than as a means of egress. (U) Section 1021 Horizontal Exits: Not more than 50% ? • On second floor at 90 of the exits may be through a minute rated door swing in horizontal exit. Horizontal exit walls direction of egress. Seee shall be constructed as 2 -hour fire wall OSFC for stand pipe req. or fire barriers. Sec 905.4: (V) SR 104.3.1.1 & Section 706 Fire Barriers: Openings to be rated 90 It min. in fire barriers in buildings of Type III, IV and V construction when sleeping is located on or above the second floor. -4- . _ .,. : ,.. •, ,. .:,s:..`_a �, ,n�'- ... - ii ';3i;a ^. �: � . « ,. ..... .. ... 9,:..:, :�.: ". ^:'�'� • .:,. , �: - M�.w > , _.,..ter` ,. fi . � ~ , R.. t ".'� _'t it:. if' rr •_...n.•.,,.... r.• :RE ip. c..,,.:,; 11 „ CO NTw�;; OAR R UF E -S CTION y ,} , ,, ` ; . `, h • ,. _ • 'i: - .. �, ." ., .. p �tix � Sa.e� aF NO (W)Section 1023.1 Exit Discharge: The exit discharge X shall be at grade or have direct access to grade and shall not reenter the building. EXCEPTION #1: A maximum of 50% allowed to egress through NA an area on the level of exit discharge if all of the following are met: 1.1 The exit enclosures egress is readily NA visible & identifiable to a free and unobstructed way. 1.2 The entire discharge area is separated NA from areas below. 1.3 Sprinklered or separated from the NA Egress path. EXCEPTION #2: NA A maximum of 50% allowed to egress through a vestibule when all of the following are met: 2.1 Entire area of vestibule is separated NA from areas below with fire rated construction. 2.2 The depth from the exterior of the NA building is not greater than 10' and length not greater than 30'. 2.3 The area is protected by construction NA of equivalent to wired glass in steel frames. 2.4 The area is used only for means of NA egress and exits directly to the outside. EXCEPTION #3: NA Stairways in open parking garages. Exception 5 allows exiting through the open parking garage. (X) Section 1023.3 Exit Discharge Location: Exterior �( balconies, stairways & ramps shall be 10' from lot lines & buildings or protected as required by Section 704. (Y) Section 1008.1.2 Door Swing: Egress doors shall be '( ■ Change swing @ 2 side- hinged swinging in the direction floor horz exit in direction of exit travel when serving 50 or more. of egress. (Z) Section 1008.1.8.6.1, SR 107 & SR 108.3 -5- IITOMPLLEDf. COMMENT • iq : I oymtRpms)ET.,tomr.-z,,e4,,:alavJx Controlled Egress Locks: Shall be 9 Confirm conformance permitted to be installed on doors serving SR-1 occupancies provided they are protected in accordance with Appendix SR 107 and SR 108.3. (AA) SR 107.2 Sprinkler Protection: In accordance 9 • Conformance req. with Section 903.3.1 (NFPA 13). Residential & Quick Response Sprinkler Heads: Shall be installed throughout all light hazard locations and in dwelling and sleeping units as required by Section 903.3.2. (BB) SR 107.3 & SR 107.3.1 Fire Alarm Protection: As required 9 Conformance req. by SR 107.3, Section 907.2.6 and NFPA 72. (CC) SR 104.2 & Section 1016 Fire extinguisher boxes located in rated X corridor walls and other rated walls shall not diminish the required rating of the walls. Chapter 11 Building Accessibility Section 1106.1.11.3.1 Sleeping Rooms: Within SR occupancies, provide a percentage of sleeping rooms equal to the minimum number of accessible rooms required in Table 11-B. Sleeping rooms for hearing impaired 9 ■ Confirm conformance shall comply with Table 11-C. Toilet rooms adjacent to sleeping •Provide detailed plan rooms shall comply with Table 11-B. for each type ADA toilet Section 1108.2 Bathing & Toilet Facilities: When NA bathing facilities are provided at least 2%, or not less than one, tub or shower in each separate bathing facility shall be accessible. Section 1108.4.10 Alarms: When provided, only audible ? • Confirm conformance alarms are required in SR occupancies. Sound shall be as required by Oregon Fire Code. -6- ... .. ..: .. .: r,:�, �- -::::,::.,. ^:} }: : ' ;; ..p., t �.,.. .._ a;,...'e rp,, .: a:.i:�4si,`-''s'?iuY..3f "::3:, " aiPi �r�. .a.:l ",,.,.. `� -.. :- :.,,.. ..x,.:,...s... ;. =::. <'_'.Y'_,Kt.:!.�i:'�'x.ni ,tif', �y� b} -�#,. ts._ ..<, ... .._. < .....: .. :.. ...... F_:a_,.. .,,;: .:�.. _. ., .,`4,�'.r�`, s.'a"a-'�:'(�;. �Niati:w'..^ �.t rs".r+w: y . ,. (.. S µ s ..'s:z:�"; :ri �.,t�>., i�� °. ..:;2rv,�? ,, �.. ,i ° '' - " FF , ;;, : r.; �.e., ... .;:.,. .;.s f.ctt± , - ^. .r ;, !, „nc`fc %:n;•.t:e. E1VT` t, ..F. ,L ..x:: ,.r..: fit:- «; =,;c S. - 4: l : :.- y:`4 ^:t.; r ..,. ., a ........., ., S .,.... r, ,.. 4 i, dew Section 1109.10.10 Shower Stalls: A transfer shower stall X is 36" x 36 ". The clear floor space in front of a transfer shower is 36" x 40" (extending 12" beyond the shower head wall). A roll -in shower is 30" x 60" clear. Section 1109.11.3 Sinks: Counter height is 34" max. ? • Confirm conformance Knee clearance shall be adaptable to 27" high & 30" wide. Section 1109.15 Signage: Signs shall be adjacent to 9 ■ Conformance req. latch side of door or nearest wall, 60" high with no obstruction within 3 ". Section 1109.18 Seating: Tables & counters wheel 7 • Show on furniture & chair space required for forward equipment layout drawing. approach to a fixed table is 30" x 48 ". Table top shall be not less than 28" or more than 34 ". Aisles are not less than 36 ". COMMENTS: See OSSC Sec. 1009.4 Stair Landings: Width of landings shall not be less than the width of stair served. The design of the exit enclosure does not comply with this requirement. Remove biased walls at landings. May 4, 2006 Robert F. Losch !ie Date Health Facilities Consultant u FACILITIES PLANNING & SAFETY RFL:djs -7- FACILITY ELITE CARE CORP., GRANT ST. RCF, TIGARD PR#: 01-76 PROJECT 24 UNIT RCF ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITIES (RCF) Licensed by Seniors and People with Disabilities Schematic Review X Construction Review CO flNT "r. ?comp - ovit,*040figoopuvh.w..,:' - Af.51:4 g$.1■031. 411-055-0010 PRE-APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS (4) SUBMISSION OF BUILDING PLANS (a) After the letter of intent has been submitted to the department, one set of building plans and specifications will be submitted to Health Services, Facilities Planning and Safety (FPS). Facilities Planning and Safety will review the plans for compliance with the building requirements set forth in these rules. (b) Building plans must be submitted to FPS: (A) Prior to beginning construction of any X new building. (B) Prior to beginning construction of any addition to any existing building. (C) Prior to beginning any remodeling, modification, or conversion of an existing building that requires a building permit. (D) Subsequent to application for an initial X license of a facility not previously licensed under this rule. (c) Plans will not be considered to have been 9 ri*COnfirm received by FPS if a letter of intent has not conformance been received by the Department. (d) Plans will comply with the current edition of the Oregon Structural Specialty Code and Oregon Fire Code as required for the occupancy classification and construction type. Page 1 of 17 _+.,, +... ,�- .j :a. :? v sr«c: ,wYr:S. • 'itci .iS',,,�e3` '� s. ::.a�., ..._. �e - < r,� F•: - ,,,' ,, s.,. � � s??`�'. .4.. ,.. ,duiid : +.`ax`} .. ,i..rx..:.. „_, _!.:,, ,,;,,;,,,, ;; �.. ..3.._ .. q ,: ; a,;:.;,:w,.- ia.,r .:" .. x.: e -A;+, E` �:( -- .,..; ..Y�z.. '.-, � za t6 a iR'° '• + ,a s:d�raE " =� s e ,•• `t.��' a�xx :.Y9: "�."iiT:ki;{'tarG # �f : ?:<:: ".; '.;: ..... • „r., ,,,, ,. te. . ., .. w..sp ;.tt §Y ?c a:t�e t •r ; . ,t,t, •x Y'.� t' ;e:;r, r. .v , n. a'�; �::, :,. �- a. ,., x .M *f- : . 441 : , , . ColvrPirEV.s ,t ..,; y c a �:; : '�u,: ; , {, , x 7�"�,s� .- ' f ;,? r .,:�s� t',ti �t� a �'' tr. ,ait� .u. t „ � ¢,. ;;, `�'.� srlsu � �s:. AD MINISTRA ., .,•r --.r - :;a�� 1. ..!.,rr i :u P i " �' ,:.. ,^ ',7 N; .o > A� 3 : C OMMEN T..,.. _ ,, ., >"fa; "_ + *,�'c'•. a,....a::- �..,i.:, .:e �;'r [z;.S!= £33.,.� "�.ro-u.z as ;rk t�ES��� x�a Xa _ :f+,;r_v" .;•rf; ^�i;n (e) Plans will be drawn to a scale of one - fourth X inch or one - eighth inch to the foot, and will specify the date when construction, modification or conversion is expected to be completed. (f) Construction containing 4,000 square feet or more will be prepared by, and bear the stamp of, an Oregon licensed Architect or Engineer. 411 - 055 -0081 FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY (1) BUILDING AND FIRE CODES Each residential care facility will meet the �( requirements of the Oregon Structural Specialty Code and the Oregon Fire Code in effect at the time of original licensure and as required by Building and Fire Code Agencies having jurisdiction. When a change in use and building code occupancy classification occurs, licensure approval shall be contingent on meeting the Oregon Structural Specialty Code in effect at the time of such change. (4) SAFETY EVACUATION CAPABILITY (a) The evacuation capability of the residents X and staff is a function of both the ability of the residents to evacuate and the assistance provided by the staff. Facilities classified as impractical or slow shall meet one of the following evacuation levels. * (A) SR -1 Impractical or I -2. A group, that safety iii a tiiiidy iitdffi1cr, with other dementia arc within this • -• - : -• - I -I t - . - i:. • -• to an cmcrg . ncy. * (A) SR -1 Slow. A facility for more than �( 16 residents that can move to a point of safety in a timely manner with some assistance and have evacuation drill times over 3 minutes, but not in excess of 13 minutes. Page 2 of 17 • ... .. .. ,: , e- .. ,. ... ;.y,.. •-; . x!_. .i; .. .y..A, `,., ..ii• -t r , f.. ' 3i' : °,Y y�, n ?:` s:£tra�t ?fi3,:y,�,...wra. *� � _ �j 'vl:,�-.t»�' S «. : "r'C:S+d'-Cx�:i3•."4 J.,.1. ,�e`"'w d "•„ - :,k^ („ ,.ci k'. ,,,.•tt:, yf���g LfttY' • u•t .. .,� ;�Fd`»Mt' ^x 4 ,.'�f.'3,� 1f"�xC.•. : :; 4 .Y cR "...' :t'�:., hit ve...t 3.. ; . . "Y 'd61s!, %l: hl,.t".✓b .. . i , t�t3 T , T i.:Ik,, ..t^. '%. 4 yr (� y p- r� �: - .,;5.:: '�:, RS� •r'./a?'.t Cx. , §Lt /( - u.4j�i' t� 1 'n`Y. ..1J.`�:' � L -�� r ::. � �:. ����: ,,:� fAs�.;.:::.�a...� n�,..; :� •;z . - /,- :iu" ;:L:! +.., .. F�.C, w F .k` 4,.. t 5s. ..., ?= '' ?4 Mom" ..i. .,& # - i • �, .. , _ e % ' �.�s._.�,_:'�- 4,..' :� MINISTRATI- �: � F >�, � �?sEp =RULE 'E C�TI ��.,' � � F k � 1 - :ik: = s ? n,oc:�+•" * (B) SR -2 Slow. A group that can move to a point of safety in a timely mannt,r with drill times over 3 minutes, but not in -excess of 13 minutes. * (B) SR -2 Impractical. A facility for more than five residents that cannot reliably move to a point of safety in a timely manner, with evacuation drill times in excess of 13 minutes, even with staff assistance. Facilities specializes in the care of persons with Alzheimer's Disease or other dementia are within this category due to the diminished ability of residents to respond appropriately to an emergency; or * (C) SR -4 (Slow). A facility for more than five, but not more than 16 residents that can move to a point of safety in a timely manner with some assistance and have evacuation drill times over 3 minutes, but not in excess of 13 minutes. (b) All existing facilities will be subject to review and may be reclassified into one of these two classification groups. Waivers will be given only with the approval of the Fire Authority having jurisdiction. *(c)All two or more story RCF's with a capacity X ""*Wall shall be const. of more than 16 capacity that submit final As a 2 -HR horizontal construction documents and receive plans of exit for this project. approval on or after April 1, 2004 January See Sec. 1021.2. A 2- 1, 2005, will be constructed to meet SR -1 HR fire barrier must • - , •• terminate at 2 -HR horz include a minimum of one 2 -hour area separations. See separation wall constructed to standards as Sec 711 OSSC. defined in the OSSC. (SR 104.3.1 Fire Barrier.) * As of January 1, 2005, the State of Oregon is enforcing the new 2003 International Building Code. Included in that code are revisions to the SR occupancies for RCF and ALF Facilities. Sometime this year (2005), these OAR Rules will be revised to reflect the new code changes. Old rules are crossed out and proposed new language is shown in Bold. Page 3 of 17 ! .;.' :i:,;; •:.f..'` :" ,. :. �r.;,;;,+.M.'a.., :J =;4,„ - � {, °.fig v' 2 � .:'fi;�.St'_ Eck: •' 'iS.9`.',"§7 '�?4:4s3:�. _ +ta��; la A .. ° - .rr, . . i . .- < Ui; :�tbx.. ''.�`.� � ,t "Q..as, ,.�'nt .�' a ':i4,� ` �FD.�',: ' p....:i ., (.��,; �" n' ?k'r.``r'2'`` Y i; S pn- ttmd;,r .: +f,7.�7�.es•rs):.,.t 7 ..' r . ;r .:,: ;,.:.: � - ':aS:[:! :,i ;:nv,.. k.. 1� i-y',,....xS'^6� *S ' .. z' - "',: ' # . X .'k_.':<a: v x....t. -Jz: a:S.a•': ...*vs '" .,p_ ;iir ^r2 Mks. ' ,:s. =rsd r +'n i�i{xa ..f.r1' e�i,,.f .Y ,,.*, -" z''i'S . .S.r`,�!`. §:'s= a .;kj.. >,� • e . ,d"`� " �Yx> a.ra�� •u: . : %� x . .s�:rt � `�i., •}�� y 7 a;. Iz�rn ;, ..'�x4 d.7.v. ra'nrrt.r.. •.•�; � � � • �GOMPLIE` .�.'•,..r'.;:...�. ��,�. , .. �'.: - ":':.. ::�' .."- > - "".; ... :nc... . a}. -p. .: ,. � ai: . k;£� S ru °'3�}„ :{� - .r.. , t iFli; w r °£ . o =r.,::? : " H %'L . ,�a?a -,J a:.:;r. ?3rsm'• .,x.,; '> :�?�te:,�s Y �' -. 'AD S' IJ ' h Yr MINISTRA:.,,•' n x'' '<, �TIV E' =RULE. . Y. 3 � .41'.: ;J'd.�iv'r.fl' �.4 uSECTION � 'k . ..... ._� a z4 Aim �:� 1VIMENT � # ES T.,. , O~ z ., ..�., , �.�,> (16) FIRST -AID SUPPLIES First -aid supplies will be provided and kept in a ? "*Confirm locked area, properly labeled and readily conformance accessible. (17) FIRE EXTINGUISHER(S) The provider will provide and maintain one or ? ii *Show on floor plans. more 2A :10B:C fire extinguisher on each floor in accordance with the Oregon Fire Code. (18) Covers, grates, or screens of wall heaters ? '*Confirm and associated heating elements will not exceed conformance 120 degrees Fahrenheit when they are installed in locations that are subject to incidental contact by people or with combustible material. 411 -055 -0091 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT GENERALLY (1) GOOD REPAIR AND CLEANLINESS (a) All interior and exterior materials and �( surfaces (e.g., floors, walls, roofs, ceilings, windows, and furniture) and all equipment necessary for the health, safety and comfort of the resident will be kept clean and in good repair. (b) Measures will be taken to prevent the entry ? w All operable of rodents, flies, mosquitos and other insects. windows shall be provided with screens. (c) The facility grounds will be kept orderly and X free of litter and refuse. (2) ENTRANCE At least one primary grade level entrance to the X building will be arranged to be fully accessible to disabled persons. (3) ACCESSIBILITY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES (a) Facilities licensed, constructed or renovated X after April 1, 2004 will meet accessibility requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act under Title III as a public accommodation and the Oregon Structural Specialty Code, as enforced by the Oregon Building Codes Division and local jurisdictions having authority. Page 4 of 17 . � F:'J' i .:. ;: .- .,d'. `•(Pbs'�. ^ 'j(f: }'.:`: �a�l �'� k &K',rfY:: ,:'; .�ai;b..:?: '.qY•e: :ii;:,}�`�'rFk: 3�i.... .. ,,�, .,,� i L� �'M;?�` i';�w�` s `;�,� - ti•. � :F� - :e�'; :. :.. -� - a3or7.;r - } :.G:.m;.: as4.'', . r..:*`•`„'��<e,rr.�i.t t t . Sf, ,:Y, .'`T'= , „ a.�: q �_ »t: :,. ..u._ s ,K xc: ...�' � G.C., ., f 3 . ,.„ + - ses'41: �`�t�., r':'.:?:7s�;i•:;;;�:;.,, ,:;. dn::, }...: ?,- -'i'iixaf'•} "e'; ..,Y.+Y( °f.. k.. -;`y t;C!rF?s,�;;.2 .. ., _ :. f 6 r . xe , . i . > RI :e • £ �•; rf 'RStr� 7 yir. ; : ;.: 0: - ;, #t, . � , , C QMPLIED � AF' V� : .,..:f.: - . . !Y�tsu�;a� °, �:; z ".. .>��i'" -. � f4 � t a a.�� � r;��� `,c. r:�� Sv ! ;: .., �y r ,'>="54f t %:�� =a,K. , ti:L ": , -_ 'a .il � " +.ta d . .r...0 f..r .�„'; t "�' -"�lx. 7,�:., •yA , -i �?H {:. ?.�F " °�`�. _ Zc AD r' a f 4 a.""yEz 3?x„v: .. , ; +; r:�7t: *.'"i.�.�Y; S .ts:,,;... . S" �,t , i'. MINIST ORUL S`ECT Gri,.., , �, . g 4, � s"-'` ; :..` :- ` >"•,: .;x.: - v- k >< - w, t� -- Ol \ >a��.,� fl'i..,q � t't °v „�. (�� ����{7�1 — ,!S'•r'.. „,.;•::. ^: `aw'`, ' .. :v �1111�'1'1'/N:T : lib_,, „�Y: , ,.,.., , '” "a -�: (b) Facilities that submit final construction �( documents and receive plans approval on or after April 1, 2004 will not include bedrooms or other resident use spaces on floors above or below the main entry floor unless an elevator meeting accessibility requirements for persons with disabilities is provided. (4) STORAGE The facility will include sufficient storage for the following: (a) Locked storage for all poisons, chemicals, rodenticide, and other toxic materials. All materials will be properly labeled. (b) Locked storage for any flammable and ? combustible materials. Materials will be properly labeled and stored in their original containers. (c) All maintenance equipment used and stored ? at the facility, including yard maintenance tools. (d) Garbage stored in covered refuse containers. X (5) OUTDOOR RECREATION AREA An accessible outdoor recreation area is required X ""*Provide a site plan and will be made available to all residents and showing outdoor have lighting equal to a minimum of five foot recreation areas. candles. Alzheimer's Endorsed Facilities will be " *No electrical located on the ground floor with direct access to drawings submitted a secure outdoor recreation area. showing on -site exterior lighting. (6) CORRIDORS (a) For facilities initially licensed on or after to open plan January 1, 1994, all residents use areas and concept. Provide resident units will be accessible through furniture & equipment temperature controlled common corridors layout plan showing 48 with a minimum width of 36 inches except min. width exit access that 48 inches minimum will be provided at system (clear paths) to accessible bedrooms. Resident use corridors exits. exceeding 20 feet will have a minimum width of 72 inches. (b) Corridors in facilities that submit final X construction documents and receive plans approval on or after April 1, 2004 will not exceed 150 feet in length from any resident bedroom to a seating or other common area. Page 5 of 17 n_; k'i ^Ti: :'i:Y ; :�s r .: ; �.. -w .••T:: + "g. ° � it R �' A . g* m a ��:�,..._.,,r - :'EF:± 3 't,n ]p 1,. mu mw n. ' x.. 'i. ,{ { ^S. ,.L. f gx,. ' h r{ "N 'd`'`di 'ES "in•'. NY 7a. .;F�' x 2 i 5 �`f "c:,f. sue• :41.... , aagg h /o- Litt {yam .F; .'$. _�.01�1:1 :' . LIE' . �:.�n s.. r i.- u< , .;G ,.?L+.'9 .'f',y�+{ k;;:A'.Aji"':.n - � : r. ^^,4°. _ vE`c �.. ^``v i'EY�, `�`.�,,'�SM -.iS'. E�.RU�LE�� -� {'Ye im: H C .. -;... ... - .:r ....... . ..... ..$ .,,.t ...,.! .r....., . . '} . , ::u '` �SE, Ol. \r�..1' - �� ::c"...d� n ,� �:, F ."� , �t; 5, ('� 7� T 5..2s *' '>i ?i? e.. $,. c � c�3_ l� �1�� �i:D�'r'.�'.t �� �rI' ... � ;f���,��o;E�Y, =: N'T� ^ � � 411 - 055 -0101 ADMINISTRATIVE AREA An office or designated area(s), separate from X ' *Where is this resident facilities, will be provided and include the located? following: (1) Secure space for the confidential storage of all ? "*Storage space under resident and business records. All records will stairs shall be of 1 -HR be kept for a period of three years. It will also construction with 60 include space for menus and other dietary minute rated door. records unless they are provided in conjunction with kitchen facilities. (2) Space and facilities for staff charting. ? '*Where does this occur? (3) Nurse call station, door alarm annunciator, X i"""*No drawings telephone, and fire alarm panels where provided submitted. Provide or required by the OSSC and the Oregon Fire drawings for review. Code. 411- 055 -0111 RESIDENT USE AREAS (1) GENERAL (a) Resident units may be comprised of 9t H *Will any of the individual apartments with private bathroom ground floor units be and kitchenette facilities or be limited to used by RCF bedroom only, with bathroom facilities residents? centrally located off common corridors. While these rules do not mandate aesthetic design, it is recommended designers attempt to emphasize a residential appearance while retaining the features required of such a facility to support special resident needs as outlined in this rule. (b) For bedroom units, the door will exit to a �( common hallway and residents will not enter a room through another resident's bedroom. (2) RESIDENT UNITS (A) DIMENSIONS (A) For facilities initially licensed on or after X January 1, 1994, each resident unit will be limited to two residents. (B) For facilities licensed prior to January 1, it 1994, resident units will include a minimum of 60 square feet per resident and allow for a minimum of 3 feet between beds. Page 6 of 17 __ ....i...�+,.'f.-- :ay.�•'sS`•. ^..r...,.�itt {:•,; ..��i�tst : ^:A',h'. G _,,.ar. ...�;, - � 3�,,. v r �s`#" ,.ate .��, .�i '- mE ";'. �i�;r:.: eFiiul' �,�s .; > .i ,t.. . t . �? ` �.,, ' , U� • , �:' . ° #... �xs,F �{,... _ _. I.gt;'.�..�.t °fit,..,;= `'::: °,_. t �;. �.. 'tMY•;i- .Y =z s a.�v. ° !;x.. .r , .?tx.�!; f. ., v„� �} ;sn.x f ,r ' V�f "m' :`.`f!: : "x3 •, f, �eaa:,� : v�::. ? 's. , $ f a 9_: ` wF,. ",' 4.i;� ... :. .:: .. . ... '. .:., , ^• ...5...: s� �': .:;... ... r, ",.... ..a.' :p�:.'-t. "v�':t' "` . ''t iC . C' , ^ /,;� �c:.r � '.b 3a`� . �.:��y, r�; ��� , OMPLIED � � ' �;: -,�„ ,_., t.•u� � ..a "a'i , r?' ^.a ��'"' p�'„sZe. .?:k!,'ejfzF �- .`+'r' ` kit � - ADMINIST n IO�.� ; �T77�� S`ECT , N +�' �.;:� �V'L'�� � . ,�,:�� %� �Pr �.� . 3.•r t?'k i� ' � t `Fkz , '¢�.^„z'S.''i4 ^� '§'� I ., i.. } - ,n.` # + a� -`'- n S eEr'�6 1i o-"xt kt - ' �,.,...� .r.rC 'O 1�1• \.'.lf^:7 .c -. "nit.- �:.,,a•, »,.: , a:`...�'. , .,.:.rte., ..,:. ,, x � :�:.'�a7 +` +,�p�'C...?:if`vs.?}• 4.- E�ES,�,: 5.�1, \,U ? (C) For facilities initially licensed on or after X January 1, 1994, resident units will include a minimum of 80 square feet per resident exclusive of closets, vestibules, and bathroom facilities and allow for a minimum of 3 feet between beds. (D) In facilities that submitted final X construction documents and received Plans approval on or after April 1, 2004, 100% of resident bedroom capacity will be accessible for persons with disabilities, meeting requirements of OSSC, FHA and the Americans with Disabilities Act. (b) Wardrobe Closet. A separate wardrobe closet will be provided x for each resident's clothing and personal belongings. Resident wardrobe and storage space will total a minimum volume of 64 cubic feet for each resident and be accessible to persons with disabilities when located within an accessible bedroom as required by OAR 411- 55- 0111(2)(a)(D). * (c) Windows - - U _ • - - U i - i • • �, 11; -� •• " window that opens directly into a public strcct, public a11cy, yard or exit court. i .. • - • - • • i - i U i • i - • - - - • i - , - i - - U; • - - ii arca of 5.7 square fect, shall have a 1 - i s - • - • • - • - - • i i - than 44 inches abuv■., fluui. Witiduws shall not be bclow grade. (B) Each resident's bedroom will have an ? , ll"Confirm exterior window that has an area at least conformance one -tenth of the floor area of the room. Facilities constructed on or after January • 1, 1994, will also have a nominal maximum window sill height of 38 inches. Operable units will be designed to prevent accidental falls when sill heights are lower than 36 inches and above the first floor. Page7of 17 I - :...::.. -�: -:s ii"':I,ar'.: ..ar:?.'"�e . �u.• " ",str: ,.-#tw : , �... . ae' =r'�i: �+ . +.:a'a : ,``�`°° ,- `�:zr3.� • 'r . ;+��.,- �u�, ° :"i:�_:7.... •r.�i' ",x ,., -• . :,. ^., . .. .�� .., . - . s{?r'"sn'p'.':. L "aw'4. -.. .L,,.:x'Si;.,.. ct `"` „,, ! :, ;s a ,rs: • ^'A:r :'SiT :. �f,... . e, •L�ti.2 ,:,a•:: . a. xn "T -.7 h is J'?'i`lN. .. : ; sh e:c ?':; �' :S�:i { %',:F' _. t?,,•x.;: a �'a . s e. - tt,. , ; };i - e�.a {; ^. 3 � , {7, xi. to c, ��•��:.�; ..+. w#;tal'.a : �; 4e -,. Eii�.:i, , ? -: >: , z , .;4r:,_, : , iR •:,,t: ,F' P , ,�;;_ C.OMPLIED,.� 0 ' .s ,^ OY� . v :, - �? tsar .,..i.�,r.��„- 'r�Ri.:�d!"s �'�+�;: ., ,�- .,,�t. a� .T!k�,.?�`?r., > f.- �_ ..,:�: .� n �.. Q s...�' . {- ..�7re:u :�•*�° �r ,..r.f ... ... ....: ...... :, �, f � s tit _ nrt I � _, ..�, �,. ?i... �..;yK.� "•�d4:ix ^�''� 't a c ✓ ?3, "`c ,:�:. Y ,�a ., :�yi+'i:;� t,: i. i4�n. :a;r�7 {:,;rt r�:'�..,- :i` AD1VI'I NISTzRATI�'E r sa`\ S IA^, i; 1 "�f'.+ ¢.f ;:("rs„ sf i • RIlLE�SECTION�{ ; ��: , . � r . � h' ._._.- r.:... . e:1 .:,., ^t.>_ '�H �: ] (C) Bedroom windows will be equipped ? *Confirm with curtains or blinds for privacy and conformance control of sunlight. (d) Resident Unit Bathrooms. If resident bathrooms are provided within a 9 11 *Provide detailed resident unit, they will include a toilet, hand drawings of each type wash sink, mirror and towel bar. Shower bathroom provided. stalls, if provided, will comply with Show all ADA subsection (3)(a) of this rule. The bathrooms requirements. must be designed for persons with disabilities. (e) Unit Kitchens. If cooking facilities are provided in resident .*None provided. units, cooking appliances will be readily removable or disconnectable and the facility will have and carry out a written safety policy regarding resident use and non use. (3) ANCILLARY AND COMMON USE AREAS (a) Bathing Facilities. Centralized bathing fixtures will be provided 1111 *All units self at a minimum ratio of one tub or shower for contained. each 10 residents not served by fixtures within their own unit. At least one centralized shower or tub will be designed for disabled access without substantial lifting by staff. Curbless showers of nominal size or tubs equipped for horizontal transfer or hydraulic lift are acceptable. All bathing facilities must meet ADA and OSSC requirements. (A) Grab bars will be provided in all resident ? *Confirm showers. conformance (B) Showerheads will be hand holdable and ? *Confirm mounted on a flexible supply hose conformance unless the resident requests otherwise. (C) Bathing areas will be located or screened to allow for resident privacy while bathing and provide space for drying and an attendant. (b) Toilet Facilities. In facilities licensed prior to January 1, 1994, X toilets and hand wash sinks will be conveniently located for resident use at a minimum ratio of one to eight residents for all residents not served by these fixtures in their own unit. Page 8 of 17 t.. - ':.f;' roiL^1Yi': H�.:: �e�: ysp:'vr;•#G�i. �*:.7;'3:t�#i' .`" =. 4'�• 3(ii?# :':{: {^ «:',R'.+Y.. #ic� c., C ;•{; Fr *' c k'i:� � - L;(iz.`'^' n3rr .... '�'! { a:, + _ } "" 1' >,r, t •-"�' �, <. ate. N t r' s:+• 'fir #. S,. t� ...... , r.. :: ':y.' : mac. ":'..:�� " c•'f•: YV �f�1.< ih';i� ti , ' "'�. " ^Y' x, :.. :.. �... .- „d,..•n .., .. ..: 7, .,;,: 3 '��i' �u`�:9:.yv€. n`rS.� +:�,�' •, < r: :._- .'e ;. .. -:: {; ..:_,.. r.= ,•__;r�.:�•<.. r.: r}S.. s„w... - r.. L: r AD MINISTRATULEuSEc MoN _ ., ;::.> > �f - ” = : :. N w - COIVIIVIENT •- : - ';.a. "�.; � „ria-. =K.r IVE . - as. -r; r. ,s •'' ,,... { ,, >:�. -.; . ,..... ,:. r ..,:.;..- :: ,c$�', ` +�it�;s���iiyfr;;E..s�:ta.�. ,�..f��� '6z` :.F:'S�:: •;M ' :O >;q ?�sii :<.�,t,��,..r;:nrr;r,. »u ". •:.�.,• (A) In facilities licensed on or after January IC 1, 1994, toilets and hand wash sinks will be located for resident use at a minimum ratio of one to six residents for all residents not served by these fixtures in their own unit. (B) For facilities that submit final �( construction documents and receive plans approval on or after April 1, 2004, toilet facilities for all of the licensed resident capacity will be accessible to persons with disabilities in accordance with the Americans with Disability Act and the Oregon Structural Specialty Code as enforced by the Oregon Building Codes Division or local jurisdictions having authority. For conversions of existing structures that receive plans approval on or after April 1, 2004, toilet facilities serving at least half of the licensed resident capacity will be accessible to persons with disabilities in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Oregon Structural Specialty Code. (C) At least one separate toilet and hand n*Where is this wash lavatory will be provided for staff located? and visitor use in facilities licensed for more than 16 on or after January 1, 1994. (D) Mirrors will be installed in all toilet on.Confirm rooms at a height usable by the resident conformance. Show except when a resident's care plan mounting height on indicates mirror availability as contra- detail drawings. positive. (c) Dining Room. (A) In facilities licensed prior to January 1, ? H*Provide furniture & 1994, dining space will be provided to equipment layout seat at least half of the residents with a drawings. minimum area of 15 square feet per resident. When double shifting is employed, the facility will have policies and equipment to assure that food is served fresh and at proper temperature for both servings. Page 9 of 17 y :'._ zr.. .sores h,,; .rf , ", ,< �' ^_#` - "z4 T ' 4S , R A . ,, , 4. ,-,44`944",'...4.1,1,1. -. C... u „� : ..+�' n a :( ^;.r, .p ^.1 :s.., ,'s:qz :w�” ,.�': ^ .0 s+. z: I i' tl x , , - 4wL7� Vita, - l �.'.. i, : t «> W ,.. :°,rry , !-' : r /<c te;+sa <^ t , : - ;-; ..h �x�s z Vii. 4 z:, ,.< '�t+lS.. ..hY��. ~rz %,3.Ts. f3.'� :CO � �'...,s . wy�' . , - ,.¢ -. x^ sm . :. i. , r� w ;j�h._�+`. . !- s .. _ r, '. w' �- ` h x. �� .z „. . , . t:i;. . .:,:s' ui, . .itSui':rG,rl.t:i. 4+s' * i',`n'myvk . e.. -,.,: i , iac r '.n �>a.a .:�;mij ;ki_ ; a. ",('m - - �. n.a:r':.. ?- �l.�r ; : ns_:, . �,_., ?� °` y .i.; a r� .�i1aii�^ =. � .°7:,' . � �T aF :.�� � h . � �ea ?:'+F, ;�^ F t � r }j ;. 1 p tiADMINISTRATI ViKULE3SECTIONS A G . a •:,,--,�< x �; v :. i:41 ,... .: ., ..:.. X _. ,1:.. , ' ; �r ,, "� :. rCOM1VIENT: Y : r,..,.9...,... ... .� >:'� .. ...e= �u'",'r:�; t,'a;�"is't+�''v'': :j.r .. "nom. .,4. -^ r. , xP 'k �4��, iti'�Etilv��a 'OA �r .r` `2 ? " (B) In facilities licensed on or after April 1, ? n *Provide furniture & 2004, dining space shall be provided to equipment layout seat all residents with a minimum area of drawing. Show dining 22 square feet per resident, exclusive of table & chair layout. serving facilities and required exit pathways. (d) Lounge and Activity Areas. The facility will include lounge and activity ? ail *Provide furniture & area(s) for social and recreational use equipment layout totaling a minimum of 15 square feet per drawings. resident. (e) Smoking Area. If there is a designated smoking area, it will ? ,,, *Will this be a smoke be separate from other common areas. free facility? 411 -055 -0115 SUPPORT SERVICE AREAS (1) LAUNDRY AND SOILED STORAGE. Laundry facilities may be located to allow for X both resident and staff use when a time schedule for resident use is provided and equipment is of residential type. Facilities will be separate from food preparation and other resident use areas. When the primary laundry is not in the building or suitable for resident use, separate resident laundry facilities will be provided in all facilities licensed on or after January 1, 1994. The following shall be included in the primary laundry: (a) Locked storage for chemicals and ? "Where does this equipment. occur? (b) Separate Area or Room and Containers That Assure Separate Storage and Handling of Soiled Linens. Arrangement will preclude potential for ? 1u*The soil work area of contamination of clean linens and clothing. the laundray appears Incontinent linen and clothing will be stored small. Where will the and processed separately from other soiled soil linen tubs be line and clothing. Facilities that submit final stored? construction documents and receive plans "*The design should approval on or after April 1, 2004, will allow separate access provide for a one -way flow of linens from to soil work area the soiled storage room or area to the without entering the washing, drying, folding and clean linen clean side of the storage. laundry. n* The design shown violates the requirements of this rule. Page 10 of 17 C IWTZY'FVA)7trtlf0 iNipmEip. „kyl lAjbMIN"t8TRA:TiveRtaTNEctioN, : ,-• (c) Processing Space And Equipment to Handle X Laundry Processing Needs. Washers will have a minimum rinse *Confirm temperature of 140 degrees Fahrenheit (160 conformance degrees recommended). In facilities that submit final construction documents and receive plans approval prior to April 1, 2004, a chemical disinfectant may be used in lieu of the otherwise required water temperature. (d) Covered or enclosed clean linen storage may ? *Confirm be on shelves or carts. Clean linens may be conformance stored in closets outside the laundry area. (2) KITCHEN AND FOOD STORAGE. Kitchen facilities and equipment in residential X *Although this care facilities of 16 or less capacity may be of facility will be under residential type except as required by the Oregon one license, a Structural Specialty Code and Oregon Fire Code. residential kitchen may Residential care facilities of 17 or more capacity be provided at each will have facilities and equipment meeting Food building living area, Sanitation Rules of the Oregon Health Services provided that the under OAR 333, Divisions 150 through 168 as number of residents applicable. The following will be included: served from each m (a) Dry storage space, not subject to freezing, in kitchen may not exceed 15. cabinets or a separate pantry for a minimum one-week's supply of staple foods. (b) Refrigeration and freezer space at proper X "'Confirm temperature for a minimum two days' supply conformance of perishable foods. (c) Enclosed or covered storage for all dishware X *Confirm and utensils used by residents. conformance (d) In residential care facilities licensed to serve X *Confirm 16 or fewer residents, a dishwasher will be conformance provided (may be residential type) with a minimum final rinse temperature of 140 degrees Fahrenheit (160 degrees recommended). In facilities that submit final construction documents and receive plans approval prior to April 1, 2004, a chemical disinfectant may be used in lieu of the otherwise required water temperature. In residential care facilities of 17 or more capacity, a commercial dishwasher is required meeting Oregon Health Services Food Sanitation Rules. Page 11 of 17 ":;i:: -5t: ..1.. f,vo-t;d:.ili:3i:.4?'' n, "i;f?.''A:S " Jr'; if:icFifC§ fez x:3?1G ;'1E'i3.: n ;r..»x 1x:yAF�Y.••2: ;f `"rr?'.'r:i,L ^.i;i: ,.�'. _ ''`�i , y f';°;',ii ..s "r"ulz: r..R wiry' . w, �,,. , ! ^t � 4�' . P3. Y f)�- -, ib'-'•e.s €. .m.fi;,. . , .;x,.. :;.3�,._ .r ...i=;;,` ,t. r-., .•;}, :rit`�3fi` '?,''`.5'%#r3�..s t t � i , •�'. . .� ? i� ..a;E, � , ' �..h..� .� , r. ^ �: r �xb _•� °� w • .. ,:'_; V P.„ - ' :: _ ..r : . . 9 . a - a,.-..., a...;=.- c,.:.r� ..... , �:� < ., a� ' �.�;,�.,�; w o •�, ;� >�- „.`i g :�s t?�f rF:. :. , �} . r �':t',: � = _. } ',� ?+n S:AD h .) { 'b 'P,tI �"1, -f :5 . i:t �.Ld :3 p %` ;� aX.,; j��;.i , 1 'YS .5 a.-.� ;i5:} .'"�"li: , MINIST ON. C I �r C� �7 O VIIVIE ».. � u ;; i��r:.M �. ,..i.., ,, 33:. - �s,H�a..,c?3; rw:+� u�: 1x: :f : �:: h • !,�i*� '^% ! : ���rl:,az�s , i' -.. �:'�” `' ,._Y��7Y� a. � 1 1 \ • Ot;� .: �x , " °a M ,w {,,u•:::� (e) In residential care facilities of 16 or less H*Departure from this capacity, a two compartment sink or separate requirement should be food preparation sink and hand wash part of the waiver lavatory will be provided. In residential care request. facilities of 17 or more capacity, a triple pot wash sink will be provided unless all pots are sanitized in the dishwasher, a food prep sink and separate hand wash lavatory. (f) Smooth and cleanable counters for food ? ""i*Confirm preparation and serving. conformance (g) Storage for cooking utensils free from dust ? "Confirm and potential for contamination. conformance (h) Stove and oven equipment for cooking and ? *A commercial stove • baking needs. is required. (i) Enclosed storage in the food preparation area X "*Where does this for garbage separate from food storage. occur? Closed garbage cans or a dumpster will also be provided outside the facility. (j) Storage for a mop and other cleaning tools X *Where does this and supplies used for dietary areas. Such occur? This is a SR -1 tools will be separate from those used in of 17 or more toilet rooms, resident and other support residents. areas. In residential care facilities of 17 or more capacity, a separate janitor closet or alcove will be provided with a floor or service sink and storage for cleaning tools and supplies. (k) Storage for cookbooks, diet planning X *Where does this information and records. occur? (3) MEDICATION STORAGE. The following will be provided: (a) Locked and separate closed storage for �( medications, supportive of the distribution system utilized. (b) A method for refrigeration of perishable �( medications that provides for locked separation from stored food items. (c) In residential care facilities of 17 or greater X capacity, constructed on or after January 1, 1994, a medication sink will be provided. (d) Medications will be stored in an area that is 3( separate from any poisons, hazardous material or toxic substance. Page 12 of 17 . mpepi7410wwwciamiili;;;F:43 ComptiED9, iRVEVSKIICNOAMitirA 17 MAN ve N4 i- eij - k wmi: ;1 0wr.s,p. ) • • 01;4"..„4 411-055-0121 DETAILS AND FINISHES (1) HANDRAILS Handrails will be installed at one or both sides of ? resident use corridors in all residential care facilities licensed on or after January 1, 1994, and in all facilities construction prior to this date when residents are admitted and retained needing their use. (2) DOORS The following will apply to all facilities licensed on or after January 1, 1994: (a) All doors to resident units, bathrooms and other common use areas will provide a minimum clear opening of 32 inches (36 - inch doors recommended). (b) Door Hardware (A) Lever type hardware will be provided on ? ii*Confirm all doors used by residents. conformance (B) If locks are used on doors to resident *Provide mfgr spec units, they will be interactive to release sheet on hardware to with operation of the inside lever handle be installed on this and be master keyed from the corridor project. side. (C) Exit doors will not include locks that ? "*Confirm prevent evacuation except as approved conformance by the Fire Authority and Oregon Building Codes Agencies having jurisdiction. Such locks will not be installed except for purposes of resident safety and with written approval of the Department. (3) FLOORS (a) Carpeting and other floor materials will be *Use of carpet constructed and installed to minimize padding prohibited. resistance for passage of wheelchairs and other ambulation aids. Thresholds and floor junctures will also be designed and installed for passage of wheelchairs and to prevent a tripping hazard. (b) Hard surface floors and base will be free from cracks and breaks that limit the ability to clean. A non-slip surface in bathing areas is required in facilities constructed on or after January 1, 1994. Page 13 of 17 • • .,!'';:;,,'K{,-M"4,:44-...t.: ore 'Cf' r,4ag_ „ ,„ ,• OMP ,..4:4UOMINI OV„'''tfr, 0AintteCONEVIENirt:; ‘v. 414 (4) WALLS AND CEILINGS. Walls and ceilings will be washable in kitchen, laundry and bathing areas constructed on or after January 1, 1994. In kitchens of facilities 17 or greater capacity, walls will also be finished smooth per Health Service Food Sanitation Rules, OAR 333-156-080. 411-055-0131 HEATING AND VENTILATION SYSTEMS (1) TEMPERATURE For all areas occupied by residents, design X *Conformance temperature for construction will be 75 degrees required. Fahrenheit. All existing facilities will include "*No mechanical heating systems capable of maintaining 68 drawings submitted. degrees Fahrenheit in resident areas. Required minimum temperatures are no less than 68 degrees Fahrenheit during the day and 60 degrees Fahrenheit during sleeping hours. During times of extreme summer heat, fans shall be made available when air conditioning is not provided. All systems will comply with Oregon Mechanical Specialty Code in effect at the time of construction. (2) EXHAUST SYSTEMS All toilet, shower and smoking rooms (when X *Conformance provided) will be equipped with a mechanical required. exhaust fan or central exhaust system that "*No mechanical discharges to the outside. drawings submitted. (3) FIREPLACES, FURNACES, WOOD STOVES AND BOILERS. Where used, installation will meet standards of the Oregon Mechanical Specialty Code. (4) HOT WATER TEMPERATURE (a) In resident areas, hot water temperature will ? *Confirm be maintained within a range of 110 to 120 conformance degrees Fahrenheit. (b) Hot water temperatures in laundry and ..*Confirm dietary areas will be as needed for sanitizing conformance dishware and laundry as stated in OAR 411- 055-0115(1)(c) and OAR 411-055- 0115(2)(d). Page 14 of 17 '., ., .; : .:;'' : "ZG :.- .x. ;:.:: •,..,. ":r�..if:- r'.:.Y;.;; a::r °..: s N,.:,.a..0 . ,. , " ":.,: ., ,.�.' °vz`'� �..rz,- - i6;V. �-a. :.�..r. -.;,s !s^;z:ei iS =_air „ _ _ _ _ . ._ ..... ..:, 1, z_.. -r.,,, <:; ,....,, ru. •....,-�. € .:: ,. ef., .,. Y.' ,,4 ?i .. �':- :;��`.t LL .+�. .-s.. � p,�e�i' .:a�+xa k i't >w3H� � &+?5' +� - - _ .,r.. ..a, :;d:.. ;.fif.. .,k.. ,! s.,e • s,.,;. : s'=r #E„z�+ ,�`"",. y �., r-`4 $`*5 ''-- �'�- �.n'�t:t„ � ,. .��.; ��. >,z�.-y`o. ^'�JS�'':ii:;�i' +cam ;:,1;:,, :. r:; °'z•.o-r. d.: , g x ,, t . . , $ , p M. .;qr. s. ^u= 4 , } ¢a !? .rr ,.- g F: . 4 .s� ,a:, �'m .'�S'n "d'a` - ' -�:a ,:�! ""£ a:✓!�'. #°: yya ' ':/9 i:.:IRi. r.`;. ,. a ;:�a : ..;,r t `•Fi' {} ,. Y x •" .=4,:a -.:; ,Y{&.- .x < r,." ' r,.. c "- Co •.j S ° .:t` rt fit;' *rt`.._.4 .ifi:,:j� - s.A.. = MPLIED 4 yyee .x • f'" - �.�. r.{s., � =^ a _ si�', �-. .sdC"i�r` � �3 'fa "' .. ::'rt;: hY"M i� .r. . .Gtt#`,e - - - 4,.. n3pn,.. ,.Y's .)�u`j j '�`*'e= ..q, ..r 1VIINI STRATIV r. �" � - �3� „., �r: .�����: �:��fr��:.;� .�i...� t .SEC }TION � '��`�:r }< . � �k NNW �,.,.:!��:�., e - - t;ir ,.r ,.;:?' >z : '.5.: nGCA:”: } -T ^4s a_?'x ,;e•, xs Z,t.- :r,..,.x e.;s .,#;. � r.;w,: .k . :.s� .z� 411- 055 -0141 ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS (1) WIRING SYSTEMS (a) All wiring systems will meet the Oregon X ffi*Conformance Electrical Specialty Code in effect at the date required. of installation and devices will be properly "*No mechanical wired and in good repair. When not fully drawings submitted grounded, circuits in resident areas may be protected by GFCI type receptacles or circuit breakers as an acceptable alternative. (b) All electrical circuits will be protected by X .*Conformance circuit breakers or limitrons in fuse boxes of required. proper capacity. Electrical loads on circuits YY *No mechanical will be limited in accordance with proper drawings submitted circuit capacity. (c) Sufficient electrical outlets will be provided X ° *Conformance to meet resident and staff needs without the required. use of extension cords or other special taps. "*No mechanical drawings submitted (d) Lighting fixtures will be provided in each '( . *Conformance resident bedroom and bathroom, switchable required. near the entry door. Lighting for evacuation H" *No mechanical will be operable during a failure of the drawings submitted normal power supply. The following illumination requirements will apply to facilities that submit final construction documents and receive plans approval on or after April 1, 2004. (A) Each resident bedroom will have X , "*Conformance illumination for way finding from the required. room entrance to each bed and to the ° *No mechanical adjoining toilet room, if one exists, with drawings submitted at least 20 foot candles of illumination measured at the floor. (B) Lighting in resident toilet rooms and X i *Conformance bathing areas will be at least 50 foot required. candles, measured at the handwash basin u.*No mechanical and 3 feet above the shower floor with drawings submitted the curtain open. - (C) Corridor lighting will equal a minimum '( *Conformance of 20 foot candles measured from the required. floor. 'n*No mechanical drawings submitted (D) Task lighting in dining rooms will equal X *Conformance a minimum 25 foot candles, without required. light from windows, measured from ""*No mechanical table height. drawings submitted Page 15 of 17 ",::v'if :;, `::P „ :v.7: is b: yY._ ,ee]i9.3S:'cFS; - 6 `au *.`��v"'.3t�' y,:.Y - . �, r,1.:.�..: >; . . ;: •.. , s„ r, t t„ rA �'� a ..4"e�`�it:i -, k` ,.r,', ;n'tiv `c:z• :. �,: "ia::i: a:.: <,:� :.; :... ;,. - _ c_ - , �„''` (?s�k�` i • MVO* ;a 1.> ca i ';�, 4t:..•� §,� ,a . s ..7 c .1 , ^'';`s >.;',::_::�: i :i:.M!rt ':s; q•.kS'.. ii •''i��:: ,ka`." ati ' ;i`' : ° ': i1�';:r' - 5:;; a a:.ix.� `.i�, .. F. �; xsY:1,Ai:a1 .�.b:. i $ a •J;..^�nc '. ,��., tt�r::. v � . .. •_.. :. , ..:.,, n. . : � ":�.. .: '- ra.:.;r t �r£;;i.' ' i`_.,k 7F�„t 'i •�;' ` 4._ _. - ..:•s,.•.� v,' e, . �c. s , .. ie.: �" .::f: ",�ii #n - A'yNY, , : , rig,; :J.�,�p,'�,,.:`, -a .z ';•i!:ti;�� "% - M 4 xW • ^: 7'YFe3 i :' •<:.:, � .. TAI �"� -;� �,.:��,� • <•,.:.;•• i�i:,:a ,Wad - .`"43p 4":'.•�x .s,.Fti�, @ ;i t r5,�,,..a� " i�:'ly ; \4 -. . i.�"' ,.. •, flax .�:xx� ":i?1`- iia." €.,gcq'C:�: r; .'�x (2) CALL SYSTEM A call system will be provided from each x 11*Conformance resident unit to a central annunciator panel at the required. administrative center in all facilities licensed on *No drawings or after January 1, 1994, if over 16 capacity, or submitted. when bedrooms are remote from the main facility. All facilities will provide such a call system when staff is not up and awake on a 24- hour basis, that sounds an alarm at the location where staff is sleeping. In facilities that submit final construction documents and receive plans approval on or after April 1, 2004, an emergency call station will also be placed in each toilet room and bathing room, when a call system is otherwise required. (3) EXIT DOOR ALARMS An exit door alarm or other acceptable system X **Conformance will be provided for security purposes and to required. alert staff when resident(s) exit Ile facility. " *No drawings When individual door alarms cannot be heard submitted. throughout the facility, such alarms will be wired or otherwise annunciated at central alarm panel(s), in accordance with their listing, that can be readily heard by staff. The door alarm system may be integrated with the nurse call system. (4) TELEPHONES Adequate telephones will be available for 3e Conformance resident, staff and visitor use, including the required. physically disabled. If the only telephone is I"No drawings located in a staff area, it must be posted that the submitted. phone is available for normal resident use at any time and that staff will ensure the resident's uninterrupted privacy. Staff may provide assistance when necessary or requested. (5) TELEVISION ANTENNA OR CABLE SYSTEM. In facilities constructed or licensed on or after $ "*Conformance January 1, 1994, a television antenna or cable required. system with an outlet in each resident unit shall ♦No drawings be provided. submitted. Page 16 of 17 • lk .. , ;.v:,, :.fti.:.. ..a ' `� :' .8,ev. , � .. :t .: r + '.:?et,l�' si"` *�••((,�, 77��,, ssue�: s7 "iA'.^.fi`" '6j -"`k r„ r 1 xi'b's'. ' : >_ t " a , '..Y. - ,... >;, ,...u.,,, .-. i `I s>r^' �:1tlaa:PP3 is P S:+z"C.. ,� 4 T" +i', r?,�$` .o-bE.=•!. ".`�:s't'ti" .::K,. ro4 ; � ,i — ..i . ±; ,� i Sx ,n M.. �° V ltfx,a.r ^..r iti x ;ap''u. .x�t,:::"-t;,;i::'J':� ,•: ' , - . x a �r,' - !?G.:.s, 'sN`- ;•�'_#',. . ��. , N• . � .7: 'al;.r,ar � a .,d r Y,?'r, r , PS ... ,:: f : fry. ..: ";.iT t r . � " i ,' ::. ..,.; N ::r MPLIED . #. , �,f, ,_ I s< _ "E,. r <r;�'5 ,:x��i�k ni " 4�g _�� ,.: s ,,,2� -� .. �3ii;`�;:�'�F� ., - fl 3. .,: ,.,�i 3 i' ,� *,7 - - ° vrr :5 . ;:.�' _.;3}'y?:'„ tn: s „p1J ^t `K�Va: i': ` , X ^ : . ' 7. •t” t :a # I „ ,^” b:i ?c:5 . _ ; ? �' ...,. o?,Y f 1 .'3 .. 4:J - .ADM INIST �� - :.....�.rn. fr f' : � 3 s a N' - . "`mrs ^tA. ,f ib: t -E .f �• „ t 14N, � ;�, C OMIVIE (6) FIRE ALARM AND SMOKE DETECTION SYSTEM An approved manual and automatic supervised tttwConformance fire alarm system meeting the requirements of required. the Oregon Structural Specialty Code is required. ttt *No drawings submitted. " -- 4-46/)‘1,y,,,:a) D 4, 2006 Robert F. Losch Health Facilities Consultant FACILITIES PLANN & SAFETY Page 17 of 17