Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SLR1990-00009
POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. 7rN E y' i p l , t- ��� ht i ph Fannc• a &, •Ninb1 1$I 344, 500 & ).S1 34AB, 6301 1:y 619 op AGENDA TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 - 7:00 P.M. TIGARD CIVIC CENTER - TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OR 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2-1 sAMEITivic LANDS REvuw P0-22=2222-MAINAMMTALSEELWAN, NPO #7 A request for Sensitive Lands Review ,Tproval to allow landforw modification in th. Fenno Creek floodplain. In order to provide for the widening of the highway and to afford adz:vat° clearance underneath the structure for the bicycle path, the bridge Mat be both widened and rais.d. This will require extending the toe of the slope into the Panne Creek floodplain. Property Location: Fenno Creek bridge at SW Soholls Frry Road and SW Nimbus Avmnue (WCTH 1S1 34AA, tax lot 500 and WCTN 1S1 34AD, tax lot 6301) 2.2 smarrm_wo_miLmkgmeL„...mis (NPO #6) A r quest for Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow access improvements to the Cook Park Riverfront including improved: 1) roadway access; 2) boat and trailer parking; 3) trail IICCOGO. Also propposed are riverbank stabilization and erosion control and the relocation of the existing boat dock structure approximately 180 feet upstream to facilitate boat staging. ZONE: R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units per acre) LOCATION: Southern terminUs of SW 92nd Avenue MTN 251 1414 tax lot 101) 243 SUBDIVISION. SUB 90-om0_ oilmaggagolg (NPO 46) A request for Subditision approval to divide a site which is approximately 1.45 acres in size into six parcels ranging from 7,500 to 10,500 square feet in size. ZONE: R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 unit/acre) LOCAT/ON: 14380 SW 97th Avenue (WCTM 251 11BA, tan lot 1301) 3. OTHER BUSINESS 4. ADJOURNMENT 'f • STATE OF OREGON County of Washington City of Tigard 'ref , • , , AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING depose and say: (Please print) That I am a yl 4A14 it for The City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC REARING FOR: I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission 1---figard Bearings Ctfic-,,r Tigard City Council A'copy (Public Beating Notice/Notic of Decision) of which is att ched (Marked address shown on the being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath Exhibit "An was mailed to each named persons at to attached list marked exhibit "B" on the le,' day of 4( 191a.-, said notice NOTICE OF DECISION a he eto attac,ed, was po ted on an appropriate Jbulletin board on the _L day of ...,,,01 0 ,, A,!, 19 g0 ; and deposited in the Udlted States Mail on the ....111b1E1 day of postage prepaid. 12AgLe.4)( (/J .„.,„„,.. PrePat0i:NPtiCeikatt.AMLEFIRLSIMIlladalLPIA...1t1 4 4 ' ' I. c' •1',4 W 0 SOS ibe4.and sworn/affirm to me on the _// day of _ . ,•:, : • . „• n. • , 4 _Person who delivered to POST OFFICE Subscribed and sworn/affirM tO me on the 19 ii .0100,100, 4,4',41:'441'44b44 do. 41i ...z. Z1 n 4 114 1 PUlJi"' .tr. tooth. .9,.... ,„, 0 e, *".„;•4, ' / " 4.4.3.546,1)0.4010, 0,..‘ ^j 341 044ii /inn 1111100 , , bkm/AFFIDAV.BKM day of NOTARY PUBLIC F OREGON dOitmled /.1 ion Skpiked: I 4. J Jr • • A • CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - BY PLANNING COMMISSION 1. Concerning Case Number(s): SLR 90-0009 2. Name of Owner: Cii7.12111Lard Name of Applicant: Ore on State Hi hwa Division Lou S isla INSIVINMENTECEMMilaiummimaisiva 3. Address 5821 NE Glisan City Portland State OR Zip nala 4. Address of Property: Fanno Creek brktag_at SW Scholll., Ferry Road and SW Nimbus Avenue Tax Hap and Lot No(s).: 181 34AA tax lot 500 & 181 34AD tax lot 6301 5. Request: 11E2gRest for 132110100MWMALAin44ML_BRREMA1_101Akkad land orm modification in theFmyloCre5111floodoln eZrASLrtorovidefort/P-_-1ewlAetanofthehl_A--g_.hwaandto_Y.-- AffRKgA4gSMRtMLJOIJUMM2LAB42Fn4ath the structure for the )212.22.1e PathA_JOILlmidge must ba both widened and raised. This wilJ.,...,.mmL.0_stictanatm the toe of thesicimlalt...11Le. Fanno Creak flood ZONING: R-12 Residential 12 RnitELWICILL-adLIL-12g14.4.2Ptiaki_ALIL-MIlitaiacret, and 1-13. IIDAREtELMLEPEtki 6. Action: Approval as requested -1L__ Approval with conditions Denial les•••■■••■•■•■• 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall, and mailed to: X The applicant and owner(d) X Owners of record within the required distance X The affected Neighborhood Planning organization X Affected governmental agencies 8. Final Decision: Tn DECISION sHntt BE FINAL ON ________________ UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard city Hall, 13125 SW Hall, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 9. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290(5) and Section 18.32.370 which prOVidee that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is glen and dent. the appeal may be submitted on City forma and must be accompanied by the appeal fee ($315.00) and transcript costs, (varies Up to a MakiMUm of $500.00). The deadline for filing of an appeal in 3430 p.m. "JO (441) i••.•■•,••■• 10. 00edtitifidt If you have any questions, PittA40 call the City of iO4#4 • til4hhihg. bopattliehti BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF frIGAJRD, OREGON Regarding an application by the Oregon State Highway ) FINAL ORDER Division for a Sensitive Lands Review for a landfomr ) alteration adjoining Fanno Creek in the R-12 & I-P zones ) SLR 90-0009 in the City of Tigard, Oregon Bridge ) (Oregon Highway Div.) L SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a Sensitive Lands Review to widen and raise the SW Scholls Ferry Rol • bridge ovf;ic Fanno Creek to allow for the widening of Scholls Ferry Road (State Route 210) and construction of a bicycle path beneath the structure. The work would occur within the 100-year flood plain of Fanno Creek and would involve landformi alterations including the extension of the toe of the slope of the highway embankment into the Fanno Creek flood plain on both sides of the creek. The site is outside the zero foot rise floodway. City staff recommended conditional approval of the request. The applicant accepted the condition of approve. No one else testified. LOCATION: SW Scholls Ferry Road bridge at Fanno Creek south of SW Nimbus Avenue, WCTM 1S1 34AA, Tax Lot 500; WCTM 1S1 34AD, Tax Lot 6301; and existing State Highway right of way APPLICANT: Oregon State Highway Division represented by Lou Spisla. and Kirk Hampson PROPERTY OWNERS: City of Tigard (TL 500) and Charles Robinson (TL 6301) SITE AREA; Less than 1 acre APPLICABLE LAW: Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 1850 (R-12 zone), 18.68 (I-P zone), and 18,84 (Sensitive Lands) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Conditional. approval EXAMINER'S DECISION: Conditionally approved IL FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS A. Site size and shape : The road vvidening project extends along Scholls Ferry Road between Murray Boulevard and the Fanno Creek bridge, a distance of approximately 1,84 miles, The area affected by the landform alteration is less than 1 acre within the City of Tigard. A roughly equivalent area inside and outside the 100-year flood plain in the City of Beaverton also will be affected, but is not within the jurisdiction of Tigard, B, Site locahoh t The ite of the bridge raising g and widening is appnxir Mel): 700 feet southWest of the intersection of SW Scholls Perry Road and SW NirrIbus Drive, Page - ilearingS Officer decision SEE 04009 (0e.egen Highway Division) , *if J�. 0 C. Existing uses and structures The area on both sides of the existing bridge is used for parks and a greenway. The land to the west of the creek south of the bridge is in the City of Tigard's Englewood. Park. Tax lot 3601 on the north side of the creek is sub - leased by the City of Tigard for park use. The area on the north side of the road is the City of Beaverton's Greenway Park. Except for the existing bridge and highway, there are no structures located within the area. D. Proposed uses and structures : 1. The applicant proposes to widen Scholls Ferry Road between Murray Boulevard and the Fanno Creek bridge, including the widening of the highway to four travel lanes and a 14 -foot median, the addition of three traffic signals, and the construction of a 6- foot sidewalk and bicycle path. The total length of the project is about 1.84 miles. 2. The applicant proposes to reconstruct the Fanno Creek Bridge to provide a structure for the widening of the proposes and to afford adequate clearance beneath the structure for a bicycle path connecting existing bicycle paths in the Tigard and Beaverton greenways. To provide support for the structure, the applicant will add fill north and south of the bridge, thereby extending the toe of the slope of the highway embankment plain creek. This application applies into the Fanno Creek flood lain. on both sides of the only filling to occur on the south side of the highway. Any fill approvals necessary on the north side of the highway are the responsibility f the City of Beaverton. E. Existing and proposed vegetation The area to be affected by the proposed landform alterati on is mostly grass - covered; there is side In e . No structures are located in . creek �'o siruc the area except for the tree road and bridge. mid-August, Fanno Creek at this . the south s1 e o the The applicant has no P . g approximately . feet wide.... : PP . not location is slow-flowing and examiner assumes the area beneath the bridge will submitted a landscaping be landscaped in a manner consistent with the greenways to the north and south. F. Topography and drainage The site drains into Fanno Creek and is in the 100 -year flood plain of Panno Creek. However, the Tigard Engineering Department indicates that the site of the landform alteration is not in the zero -foot rise floodway. G. Plan designation and zoning The Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations for the site are divided along Fanno Creek. Land on the north side of Fanno Creek has a Plan designation of Light Land on the , .gn Industrial and is zoned I-P (lndusf�al Park). south side is designated Medium Density Residential and is zoned R -12 (Residential). H. Public services and utilities served by public sanitary b.. tower The site can be s . � � � • � . are not and as part of the to`ect communication, utilities, Utility changes prop p project. Page 2 - Hearings Officer decision SLR 96 -(009 (Oregon iltighway Division) • _ ,. .. _ .= is ..._. . -. �. �. .... _ _ ..._ .�_ �+v.. a -. _,- .� ..'... �'� r� 3.- �_ • • t .. - , :. , -.• ,k .. ;, ... ._ -... __. _ � -�.. .. t .may z. a ,. . ..... r,, a.. - .r - .: :. -� _ ., .,.. �. ,.. ... _.. _. ...... ..,. _ _ _ ,.. .. .. ,+.. - ...._ .... -. .. _, - .:ice :::. }.....: ., .-�.r. -s. -' - 1 �,:. ... •r< _. : _....- _.�� t� Y «.�: «�. -. .. 1.,': �. -i . �. ,.y,.: ->. .+f w.'.. 3t`f'. ,r T:. - -mss y _ K • . a ° •r: �C T .tea r , �. _• r e..� .. '?.♦. : f' •..i` °: .. ': :[-.. . fi.. - f � - r • r n , - -. . N -. ., - P ...�,. ! t L K,:..s• :: s, :.> . F- r4�. .w'!n:t .y. «.. :.- 2 L♦ _ .'Y.� I,a. >e 'cam .. _r _.:s ti ._.::v- .-.. ".'...... Y� - '3. - r• -.. : - : -1 . -. :...._ -.... _ _ .. it _ - .•h 1e, a _ 1 :'3", - ...,, -...__ -'''''''''''':'";''''t''''''''.-4::':''':' � r....,. - .1.,.. :.. .. . , *' ... .. > .. .._� - __,- _. _ a �. • t :r. ,:�r . .:tiP'.a.n� irr6, `, ;' Fi Vt; I. Surrounding land uses : The Englewood Terrace apartment and, Englewood Park subdivision are located to the south of Englewood Park. To the north is the City of Beaverton's Greenway Park. The doll Business Center is located northeast of Englewood Park. iii. APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA & DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Chapter 18.84 (Sensitive Lands Review). 1. Chapter 18.84 contains the regulations for land subject to sensitive lands review. Sensitive lands review is intended to implement flood plain protection measures and to protect rivers, streams, and creeks by minimizing erosion, promoting bank stability, .. wildlife habitat, and preserving maintaining and enhancing water quality and fish and wil q ty potential. Section 18.84.015(A) allows public uses such as roads in areas s recreational subject to sensitive lands review. Section 18.84.015(C) requires Hearings Officer approval of landforen alterations in the 100 -year flood plain. 2. Section 18.84.026 requires use of designs, materials, and practices that minimize flood damage and the potential for damage, 3, Section 18.84•,040 provides landfonm alterations subject to sensitive lands review must comply with the following criteria: a. Land form alterations shall eserve or enhance the flood plain storage function and maintenance of the zero -foot rise floodway shall not result in any narrowing of the floodway boundary; b. Land form alterations or developments within the 100 -year flood plain shall be allowed only . in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the comprehensive plan land use map, except that alterations or developments associated with public support facilities as defined in Chapter 18.42 of the Community Development Code are allowed in residential and industrial areas subject to applicable zoning standards; c. Where a alteration occur within the flood p lauiit will result an y ncrea in the water urfa elevation of the 100- ye,,, flood; dland form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle The includes copat way in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan, unless the nstruction of said P athway is deemed by the Hearing Officer as untimely; e. The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below the elevation of an average annual flood; fi The necessary U.S. Ann Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained; and g g Where land form alterations are within and adjacent " . _ . -y within ,i alterations allowed within : to the 100 -year ear flood plain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area wit in i plain in i c,.. for i plan, This and adjacent to the flood lain in accordance with the p i . i o a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in the area shall include land of a suitable elevation for flood plain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway per. ,Page . r 'earirlgN Officer decision SIR 90 -0009 (Oregon Highway biv sion) p�: L B. Applicable comprehensive Plan Policies. .-44,000 1. Policy 2.1.1 provides the City will assure citizens will be provided an opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process. 2. Policy 3.2.1 provides that the City will prohibit any development within the 100- year flood plain that would result in any rise in elevation of the 100-year flood plain. 3. Policy 3.2.2 provides that the City prohibit development in the floodway but may allow development in the floodway if the alteration preserves or enhances the function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway; Policy 3.2.1 also provides that the City may allow limited specified development in the flood plain outside the zero-foot rise floodway. 4. Policy 3.2.3 provides that development is within the 100-year flood plain outside the zero-foot rise floodway is conditioned upon specified requirements. 5. Policy 3.5.3 provides that the City has designated the 100-year flood plain of the Tualatin River as greenway and that development within the 100-year flood plain shall be conditioned upon the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway within the flood plain. 6. Policy 4.2.1 provides that all development within the Tigard Urban Planning Area shall comply with applicable federal, state and regional water quality standards. IV, HEARING, TESTIMONY, AND NPO & AGENCY COMMENTS A. Hearing. The examiner received testimony at the public hearing about this application on August 28, 1990. A record of that tosthriony is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and Exhibit C (Written Testimony). These exhibits are filed at the Tigard City Hall. B. Summary of Testimony. 1. Jerry Offer testified on behalf of the City of Tigard Planning Department and summarized the staff report and recommendation. 2, Kirk Ha.mpson appeared on behalf of the Oregon State Highway Division and accepted the proposed conditions of approval, C. NPO & Agency Comments 1. The Engineering Department recomiriends approval of the sensitive land review, because the proposed fill is entirely outside the zero foot rise floodway and will not increase the 100-year flood elevation , 2, The Building Inspection Division indicated that an erosion control plan should be included as part of the project. Page 4 4. hearings Officer decision SLR 90-0009 (Oregon highway Division) 3. The City of Tigard Park Board commented that the bike path should be well designed so as to be safe and present no obstacles to use by pedestrians or bicyclists. The Park Board also noted that it was pleased with the connection of the City cif Tigard and City of Beaverton bike paths and greenways. 4. The Tigard Water District and the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District reviewed the request and made no objections or comments. V. EVALUATION OF REQUEST B. Compliance with Chapter 18.84 (Sensitive Lands Review). The proposed use complies with Chapter 18.84, because: a. Roadway development is a permitted use in areas subject to sensitive lands review. b. A landform alteration in the 100-year flood plain is permitted in both residential and industrial zones if the modification is related to and necessary for public support facilities such as public roadways. c. The proposed bridge and road improvements are designed to be cvnstructed with material's and construction techniques intended to be resistant to flood damage. Other Community Development Code requirements relative to floodproof construction are not applicable to the type of development proposed. d, The proposed development is outside the zero-foot rise floodway and therefore will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of a 100-year flood. In addition, the proposed alteration is small relative to the size of the flood plain, and will not jisplace a significant amount of water. e. Currently pedestrians and bicyclists must cross Scholls Ferry Road, a busy arterial, to move from the Beaverton to the Tigard portions of the bicycle path. The proposal would place a bikeway underneath the proposed reconstructed bridge eliminating the need fair highway crossings. E Approval of the US Corps of Engineers and Oregon Division of State Lands is not required, because the proposed work is not within a wetland or river channel. g. Dedication of open space is not necessary because Englewood Park is already owned by the City of Tigard, except for the portion within tax lot 3601 which the city controls through a longterm lease. C. Compliance with arplicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. or hiecnillnegpwmagpopsmalviedoedmptlioetsh:nitheigPholicy 2.1J, because notice of the, aPPlkati°11 neighborhood planning organization in the area and to owners of pmperty in the vicinity of the site and published in the Oregonian, 1 The proposal complies with Policies 3,2,i, 3.2,2, and 3,23, because the proposed landform Modification is outside of the floodway and will not result in an increase in the elevation of a 1(X)-year flood. Page 5 . itearings Officer decisiori SLR 90.0009 (OregOki Highway Division) • 1.^ • • • ; h AA N. ,. r.. � ,Y,�kw v X.1.•, t�. I � 7. 3. The proposal complies with Policy 3.5.3 because the City already owns or otherwise controls lands within Englewood 4. In order to comply with Policy 4.2.1, a condition is warranted to require the applicant to submit an erosion control plan ensuring compliance with interim erosion control measures for the Tualatin River Basin as part of the grading permit application. VI. SI'T 'E VISIT BY HEARINGS OFFICER The Hearings Officer visited the site without the company of others. VII. CONCLt SION . AND DECISION The examiner concludes that the proposed use and associated Iandfarm alterations comply with the applicable approval criteria for a sensitive lands review permit. In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and other reports of affected agencies and public testimony wad exhibits received in this matter, the examiner hereby approves SLR 90 -0009, provided: BEFORE THE CITY WILL ISSUE A GRADING AND SITE WORK PERMIT: 1. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of plan shall the building permit submittal. The p hall conform to "Erosion Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1989:" (Staff Contact: Brad Roast, Building Division, 639 -4171) 2. The applicant shall n o tify the Engineering e p a Department 48 hours before beginning work within the flood plain. (Staff Contact: Hagman, 639-4171) ) THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF IMPLEMENTED WiTHily 18 MONTHS OF THE DATE THE DECISION BECOMES FINAL. Larry Epstein, Page 6 hearings Officer decision SLR 90.0009 (Oregon highway Division 44 LOU SPISLI .• •• 5821 NE -GLISAN ST•• • PORTLAND, OR 97213 CHARLES ROBINSON 10330 SW SCHOLLS FERRY ROAD TIGARD, OR 97223 ORE. STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION KIRK HANPSON 5821 NE GLISAN ST PORTLAND, OR 97223 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 - 7:00 PM TIGARD CITY HALL - TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR 97223 CASE: I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST Sensitive Lands Review SLR 90-0009. FILE TITLE: State Highway Division 4 SUMMARY: The applicant requests Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow landform modifications in the Fanno Creek floodplain adjacent to SW Scholia Ferry Road. The SW Scholia Ferry Road bridge over Fanno Creek must be both widened and raised to provide adequate clearance underneath the structure for a bicycle path as well as to allow for widening of the highway. This bridge construction will require extending th toe of the slope into the Fanno Creek floodplain. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial Medium Density Reaidential ZONING DESIGNATION: I-P (Industrial Park) R-12 (Residential, 12/acre) APPLICANT: Oregon State Highway Division (Lou Spisla - Representative) 5821 NE Glisan Street Portland, OR 97213 OWNER: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 (Tax Lot 500) Charles Robinson 10330 SW Scholls Ferry Road Tigard, Oregon 97223 (Tax Lot 3601) LOCATION: Fanno Creek bridge at SW Scholia Ferry Road, south of SW Nimbus AVenue (State highway right-of-Way as well as parcels WCTM iSi 34AA Tax Lot 50o and WCTM iS1 34AD Tax Lot 6301) Community Development Code Chapter 18.84 (Sensitive Lands) ComprehendiVe Plan Fanciest 2.1.2, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.30 3.5.1, 4.2.1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval subject to conditiond. APPLICABLE LAW: REP 11408 OFFICER SLR 0-.0009 - STATE OF ortEcoM PAGE 1 � r.. Z r 5�, s .. 1 J R T I 1 t �' ✓. .rY.•;��r.,•�::j } �.Y: � .,JS: @ ,! ',P:'• is r �� II. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS A. Site locations The area of proposed work is approximately 700 feet southwest of the intersection of SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW Nimbus Drive. The proposed work is on the south side of SW Scholia Ferry Road within the Scholia Ferry Road right -of -way and Englewood Park, adjacent to Fanno Creek. B. Existing uses and structures: The area on either side of the existing bridge over Scholia Ferry Road is used for parks and greenway uses. The lands to the east are within the City of Tigard's Englewood Park. Tax lot 3601 on the north side of the creek is sub - leased by theity of Tigard for park use through an agreement with the %toll Company and the property's owner, Mr. Robinson. The area on the north side of the road is the City of Beaverton's Greenway Park,( The area to be affected by the proposed highway widening and bridge replacement is mostly grass covered and contains one deciduous tree on the south side of the creek. No structures are located in the area with the exception of the existing bridge and highway. In mid - August, Fanno Cre =k at this location is slow- flowing and approximately 15 to 20 -feet wide. • C. Proposed uses and structures: The applicant proposes to widen Scholl° Ferry Road between Murray Boulevard and the Fanno Creek bridge. The project involves the widening of the present highway to include four travel lanes and a 14 -foot wide median, the addition of three traffic signals and the construction of a 6-foot sidewalk among other improvements. The total length of the project is approximately 1.4 miles. In order to construct the proposed highway improvements, the Highway Division is proposing to reconstruct the Fanno Creek Bridge in order to provide for the widening of the highway and to afford adequate clearance underneath the structure for a bicycle path connecting the two cities' greenways, it will be necessary to both widen and raise the bridge. In order to accommodate this, it will be necessary to extend the toe of the slope of the highway embankment into the Fanno Creek floodplain on both sides of the creek, as well as on both sides of Scholls Ferry Road. Any fill approvals necessary on the north side of the highway are the responsibility of the City of Beaverton. The applicants request Sensitive Lands Review approval for the he filling to occur on the South side of the highway within the City of Tigard. D. Plan Designation and Zoning: The Comprehensive Plan and toiling designations for this area are divided along Fanno Creek. Properties on the north aid=s of Fenno Creek carry a Plan designation of Light Industrial and are zoned I -P (Industrial Park). Properties on the south side of Fenno Creek near the bridge carry a Plan designation of Medium Density Residential, and are Zoned R .42 (Residential, 12 units /acre). HEARINGS' OFFICER - SLR 90 -0009 STATE OP OREGON PAGE 2 vicseiesessm E. Surroundiag Land Uses: The Englewood Terrace apartments and Englewood Park subdivision are located to the south of Englewood Park. The a(oll Business Center is located northeast of Englewood Park. III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Cha ter 18.84 Sensitive Lands Review: 1. Chapter 18.84 contains regulations for lands within 100 year floodplains that are subject to Sensitive Lands Review. Sensitive Lands Review of proposed developments in these areas is intended to implement floodplain protection measures and to protect rivers, streams, and creeks by minimizing erosion, promoting bank stability, maintaining and enhancing water quality and fish and wildlife habit t, and preserving scenic quality and recreational potential. Section 18.84.015(A) allows community recreation uses such as bicycle and pedestrian pathways and parks in areas subject to Sensitive Lands Review. Section 18.84.015(B) allows roadway improvements and utilit installation in sensitive land areas. Section 18.84.015(C) requir -4r Hearings Officer approval of landform alterations or development in the 100 --y': ar floodplain. 2. Section 18.84.026 requires use of designs, materials, and practices that minimize flood damage and the potential for damage. 3. S -ction 18.84.040 provides that landform alterations subject to Sensitive Lands Review must comply with the following criteria* a. Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero -foot rise floodway shall not result in any narrowing of the floodway boundary; b. Land form alterations or developments within the 100 -year floodplain shall be allowed only in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Nap, except that alterations or developments associated with community recreation uses, utilities, or public support facilities as defined in Chapter 18.42 of the Community Development Code shall be allowed in areas designated residential subject to applicable zoning Standards; c. Where a land form alteration or development is permitted to occur Within the floodplain it will not result in any increas in the water surface elevation of the 100 -year flood; The land form alteration or development plan includes a Pc destrian %bic:ycle pattiw y in accordance with the adopted pedestrian %bicycle pathway plan, unless the construction of Said pathway is deemed by the Hearings Officer as untimely HEARINGS OFFICER a SLR 90 -0009 .W STATE 00 OREGON PAGE 3 e. The plane for the pedestrian /bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below the elevation of an average annual flood; if The necr•salary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained and g. Where land form alterations and /or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100 -year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the Comprehensive Kan. This area shall include portions of a suit: ble elevation for the construction of a pedestrian /bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. B. 82.0.icable Conn; . a,:ehensive Plan Policies: 1. Policy 2.1.1 provides the city will assure citizens will be provided an opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process. 2 Policy 3.2.1 provides that the city will prohibit any development within the 100 -year floodplain that would result in any rise in elevation of the 100 -year floodplain. 3. Policy 3.2„2 provides that the City prohibit development in the floodway but may allow development in the floodway if the alteration preserves or enhances the function and maintenance of the zero -foot rise floodway; Policy 3.2.1 also provides that the City may allow limited specified development in the floodplain outeide the zero -foot rise floodway. 4. Policy 3.2.3 provides that development is within the 100 -year floodplain outside the zero -foot rise floodway is conditioned upon specified requiaements. Policy 3.543 provides that the City has designated 100 -year floodplaine of the Tualatin River and its tributaries as greenway and that development within the 100 -year floodplain shall be conditioned upon the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway within the floodplain. 64 Policy • p ® development within the Tigard Urban Planning Area shall comply with applicable federal, state and regional . water quality etandhrde. IV. Iwo a AGENCY COMMENTS 1. The Engineering bepartiraent had • following comments' reviewed the proposal and offers the a. The applicant has submitted a hydraulic proposed enlarged opening for the scholls HEARINGS OFFICER a SLR 90 -0009 - STATE OF OREGON analysis to determine if the Ferry Road Bridge at Fanno PAGE 4 Creek would significantly increase peak flow discharges downstream. The study concluded that "The proposed bridge produces a negligible effect on downstream peak flow". b. The applicant has reported that the permit as required by section 404 of the Clean Water Act has been approved. c. Subsection 18.84.040 of the Code requires that "land form alternations help preserve or enhance the maintenance of the zero flood rise floodway and shall not result in any narrowing of the floodway boundary." The ordinance further requires that "Where a land form alteration or development is permitto4 te occur within the flood plain it will not result in any increase IX the water surface elevation of the 100 year flood". Although not shown on the submitted plan, it appears that the proposed fill is entirely outside of the zero foot rise floodway. Since the applicant has shown that the fill will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100 year flood, the application should be approved. 2. The Building Inspection Division indicates that an erosion control plan should be included as part of this project. 3. The City of Tigard Park Board has reviewe,1 the that the bike path should be well designed so as obetacleo to use by pedestrians or bicyclists. to see the connection between the City of Tigard paths and greenways being made. 4. The Tigard Water District and the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District have reviewed the request and have no objections or comments. proposal and has commented to be safe and present no The Park Board is pleased and City of Beaverton bike 5. No other comments have been received. V. EVALUATION OF REQUEST A. Com liance with. Communit Bevel° ment Code. 1. The proposed Use complieo with Chapter 18.84, bedause: a. Roadway development is a permitted Sensitive Lands RevieW. use in areas subject to b. A landform alteration in the 100-year floodplain La permitted in areas deoignated by the comprehensive Plan for either residential or industrial use if the modification is related to and necessary for public support facilities Such as publid roadway°. c. The proposed bridge and road improvemen4c6 are designed to be constructed With materials and Construction technilades intended to be resistant to flood damage. other Community Development Code kaaltiirement° relative to floodproof constru ction are not applicable to the type of proposed structures. uthAiNd8' ot'OtdElt dtlit 064.0609 STATE OF b#4dO$: .,•1•■•• ' . •■••■ ,••■ • ....,,,,,, ••••■• •■•• , „. • PAGE 5 40.Akea,;ft0W.el.reek'bemeM. ...213101171.714101110.MIRMIN d. The proposed filling is outside the zero-foot rise floodway and therefore is not anticipated to result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year flood. In addition, the proposed alteration is small relative to the size of the floodplain area and is not anticipated to displace a significant amount of water during periods of extreme flooding. e. Connection of existing pedestrian/bicycle pathways is proposed as part of the highway improvement project. Currently pedestrians or bicyclists must cross Scholls Ferry Road, a busy arterial. The proposal would place a bikepath underneath the proposed reconstructed bridge so as to eliminate the need for highway crossings. Properties on the both sides of SW Scholia Ferry Road are already owned or leaeed by public agencies and are managed for open space and recreational purposes; further dedication is therefore unnecessary. f. Further approvals from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer and Oregon Division of State lends are not required because the proposed work is not within a wetland area. Dedication of open space is not necessary because Englewood Park is already owned by the City of Tigard, except for the portion within tax lot 3601 which the City controls through a long-term lease. g. B. 92EakiaieLlatILSIalattfInalve Plan P°11.cles ---_-____- 1. The proposal complies with Policy 2.1.1 because notice of the application and hearing was provided to Neighborhood Planning Organization NPO #7 and to owners of property in the vicinity of the site. Notice of the hearing was published in the Oregonian newspaper. 2. The proposal complies with Policies 3.2.1, 3.2.2, and 3.2.3, because the proposed land form modification is outside of the Fenno Creek floodway and id not anticipated to redult in an increase in the elevation of the 100-year flood. 3. The proposal compliee with Policy 3.5.30 because the City already owns or otherwise conteols lands within Englewood Park. 4. in ordek to comply with Policy 4.2.1, a condition is warranted to require the applicant to submit an erosion control plan ensuring compliance with interim erosion control measures for the Tualatin River Basin, as part of the grading Permit application. tkEdtit414ENOATIO14. The Staff COnOltded that the proposed tiiiihg . ii1• iOtoltioto. the §dhOtiti welfare of the dit Ahd nOt be .eighifiCAhtiy 4ett.ithehtAi hoie-it3utiotie-to dukkOtiihdiril land UBe p.tovided.. the develabineht. .0004k0 in COW01:i.i4h00. with 0.tOtkOt ittotototit. btk. 00-6000 .,.... STTE OF OAtOoil .PAGE 4 • tozcsumgoammiumainiVii.MIUMIICIEBAKMANSIMINEMI applicable local, state and federal laws. Staff, therefore, recommends approval of Sensitive Lands Review r,voluest SLR 90-0007 subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall notify the Engineering Department 48 hours before beginning work within the flood plain. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman ( 639- 4171) 2. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1989." STAFF CONTACT: Greg Derry, Engineering Department (639-4171). 3. This approval shall be valid if exercised within 18 months of the final approval date. ry Offer sociate Planner APPROVED BY: Keith Liden Senior Planner br/JO:SLR9009.ho DATE HEARINGS OFFICER - SLR 90-0009 - STATE OF OREGON PAGE / LEGIBILITY STRIP TIMES P I N COMPANY P_O_ BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684 -0360 BEAVERTON. OREGON 97075 Legal' Notice Advertising ® 0 Tearsheet Notice e` Q Duplicate Affidavit City of Tigard PO Box 23397 Tigard,: Or 97223 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY. OF WASHINGTON, )sS. t being first duly sworn; depose and sax that rid the Advertising_ Director,; or his 'principal clerk,. of the I igara Ames a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 ` and 193-.020 published at Tigard in the aforesaid county and state; that the 'ub7 is Hearing/ SLR "/13 1067' a printed copy of which= is hereto annexed,_ was published in; the entire issue of said newspaper. for One successive and consecutive in the following; issues: Augusts 16,, 1990' s n �v� tryi i`� L Thei ul'b�j$ h it ` } fldd_ h cb..a .;cc; . i � ec pe :ea= 125$-*W; 5 = .At REVIEW. GH AY == 1 - g�� -si • °ate yLfo � Creek € - from �a n .af r S a t clee a .tea Subscribed and sworn _t before meth thi0.6th day of August 1990. Notary Public for Oregon PAr Com1i ioa' s...,:?�.,'t _ .:':��r�. StaJt•: ;4r )Ay ssi4,}v' ". 1. � xa.` �;��.r 4 s::C.'ys z�i t;; +;1 y ('.;.,sry� ttif'y.�g'ic p "k.'a4. ` i'M �1,�... .l,, fisesl. - -.r.' !.i �}.. +riYl it+tKryis,,S NOTICE: All persons desiring a to speak on any item must sign their name and note their address on this sheet (PLEASE PRINT YOUR ) 0 6tA PLEAS PRINT T SCOUR NAME AND FULL ADDRESS PROP0 N (FOR) OPPONENT AGAINST W, STATE OF OREGON County of W: nhington City of Tigard AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING Y, Jud Ra 1 , being first duly sworn /affirm, on oath depose and say: (Please print) That I am a Office Assistant _I for The City of Tigard, Oregon: XX That I served NOTICE OP PUBLIC HEARING FOR: That I served NOTICE OP DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission XX Tigard Hearings officer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice /Notice of Decision) of which is attached ((Marked Exhibit "A") was mailed to each named persona at the address shown on the attached list mar d DECISION it "B" on the 10th day of August 19 90 li ®t marked exhibit said ISION as hereto attached, was ®ais� notice � posted on an appropriate bo = rd on the 10th day of _Auc1U3t ,.0 19_ 0 ; and deposited in the United States Mail the 10th day of Au us, _ 19 90 postage prepaid .�..o...a 0 Motice /Poste Per De lion Onl •ear ., d r Worn /af f ircn to me on the • b W r r ` day of NOT My PUBLIC OF OREGON mmission Expires: S ,,9 P who delivered to POST OF'F'ICE Sul bscribed and sworn/affire to me on the �� day of 'L9 • 2 wml11,+,,r, ����, �fh�,ag3adSydd�� �� " , d dd +e. q x,31 ►d Platog. ar-44ty 0440400 b nnY �Dn b ®nc i A. �,..�s NOTARY PUBLIC OP OREGON My Commission Expires: 41161.114ENEFIRSIDRIMMIUMM NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD BEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON THURSDAY, Atac5L.213a__L_1.990 , AT am PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: FILE TITLE: APPLICANT: SLR 90-0009 NPO #7 State Highway Division Oregon State Highway Div. OWNER: City of Tigard Lou Spisla PO Box 23397 5821 NE Glisan Street Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 979213 REQUEST: Applicant requests Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow landform modification in the Fenno Creek floodplain. In order to provide for the widening of the highway and to afford adequate clearance underneath the structure for the bicycle path, the bridge must be both widened and raised. This Will roquire extending the toe of the slope into the Fenno Creek floodplain. LOCATION: Fenno Creek bridge at SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW Nimus Avenue (WCTM 151 34AA, tax lot 500 and WCTM 151 34AD; tax lot 6301) ZONING DESIGNATION: R-12, R-4.5, and /-P COMPREHENSIVE MAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential, Low Density Residential, Induatrial Park (See Map • On Reverse Side) THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER MAY ATTEND AND BE HEARD, OR TESTIMONY MAY BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO BE ENTERED INTO THE RECORD. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER PRECLUDES AN APPEAL; AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FORM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED OM THAT CRITERION: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT 639-4171, TICARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., OR CONTACT LOUR NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION (NPO) 4 '7 . CHAIRPERSON: Prank BeCker PHONE NUMBER: . .1 . !... polo pIlm �,�3 83133 g2 172 9Z LZ 18134M -00600 .............. MATTHEWS, MURRAY J /ROBIN R 11338 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 ifdo ^:..n o. 6,1 I... 1S134RA -00 ue• BENNETT, WILLIAM R BETTY 11340 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 18134AA- 00800 •.a..o .•.e ..a..... LIPSKA, JOE L AND BARBARA S 11342 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 1S134AA- .01000 FLEMING, BRUCE AND SUSAN 11346 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 18134AA -01200 ....a•.... PEACH, DOUGLAS C /DENISE 11350 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 18134AA -01400 4.. LIVINGSTON, ROBERT F 11735 SW TUALATIN RD TUALATIN OR 97062 1S134AA -01600 CANEPA, FRANK A AND DEBORAH K 11341 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 18134AA -01800 ROBINSON, CHESTER L WILLIAM R AND CONSTANCE A BY KOLL BUBINEBS CENTER 10110 8W NINfluS SUITE B -13 PORTLAND OR 97223 1q q AA,. S134AA -00900 ....a.a ...... 4100110* BREWER, WILLIAM N AND NANCY L 11344 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 1S134AA —Oi100 •.................. • HANSEN, MELVIN JAMES JR AND HARBOUR, ELEANOR ,X 11348 SE IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 18134AA -01300 .............•.....a HUMSTON , RYLAND L AND LOUISA I? 11351 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 15134AA.- 01500 ..., ►... a............ LONG, DAVID N & SHELLEY N 11343 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 18134AA -01700 .a.....a ............. SNIDER, HAROLD F AND VICKI L 11339 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 ... :.S134AA -01900 •..........ai•..a...... ON, CHEST CONSTANCE A ER ASSOCIATES RO WILLI BY N 0 SW COLUMBI UXTE 1750 PORTLAND e:. t;, 1S134AD-06200 ROBXIQON, CHESTER L WILLIAUND CONST BY KOLL BU 10240 4. '.IMBU FOR AND A CENTER TE L•..3 OR 97223 18134AD.'.08800 • • • • • • e • • • • • • • • • . • 6* • WOITKE, LARAINE 2348 APALOOSA WAY WEST LINN OR 97068 1S134AD.•08600 ....... . . COMELLA, ROBERT L 10553 SW WINDSOR CT TIGARD OR 97223 1S134AD•49100 JOHNSON, NOLAN G SAMCO—JOHNSON, CYNTHIA 10793 SW 106TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 SONEECK, MICHAEL P CONYNGHAM, EMILY E 10617 SW WINDSOR CT TIGARD OR 97223 1S134AD.....06700 0. . MASAFUNI/MINAKO 10579 SW WINDSOR CT TIGARD OR 97223 34AP-09000 . IM 119134AD 09200 CASPIO, ANTHONY N 10787 SW 106TH AVE TIGARD 1:3134AD••09300 • e e • a HARTINGER, CRAIG AND BARDUE, MARY KAYE 141108W 112TH AVE #3 TIGARD OR 97224 1E1134AD...09600 CROSS, KEVAN D Q KIM K 10753 SW 106TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 1S135E10..41200 ................ WINMAR PACIFIC PO BOX 21545 SEATTLE WA 98111 18134AD...09400 HOWARD—KIM INC 10900 NE 8TH ST SUITE 900 BELLEVUE WA 98004 18134AD,49600 HOWARD—KIM INC 10900 NE 8TH ST SUITE 900 BELLEVUE WA 98004 1S134A0-02300 ..................... HART, JOSEPH T AND MARY R 10993 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD OR 97223 � gi. .rJ:.Y Z r .1. L'Y C it l Y. ,L•. 11t -�• wt, f ^S$ r:7- � "� 'i ..,: t ..t).,•, ,. ,. - ...:.i, !., ,,:.t . . , . ., � -J;S .r.:,..c��L, I. 't1�+.t- ;•t:•.,.t, 5 r 1S134AD- 00200 „i,�� ,• TJ.Aw: o.p• MCCARTNEY, MARGARET E AND S ON 11354 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 18134AD -00400 ... •.•....•......... GLANZ, NICK BERTHA A 11358 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 18134AD -00600 .u•.........a.....• NAGMAY, JOSEPH A 11362 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 1S134AD -00800 .......... 0 • • ....... e KATZ, HOWARD F SANDRA R 11366 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 18134AD -01000 •.•..... ............. HERR, CURTIS OMYER 11386 SW IRONWOOD LP TIGARD OR 97223 1S134AD- 01600 ......•.•..•..•.•••.. ROMERO , JOSE 1MI KATHLEEN R 11375 SW LAKEWOOD CT TIGARD OR 97223 18134AD -01800 o,ee•e....: FLANAGAN, CHARLES E JR AND MARY K 11371 SW LAKEWOOD CT mg= OR 97223 18134AD- -02000 . • WOODRUFF, BRIAN K AND KAREN LYN 11367 SW LAKEWOOD COURT TIGARD OR 97223 1s134AD -02200 ..•.....S•..........• GRAETHER, IRENE A 11361 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 • is134AD -02400 . •.. T EYRD, RONALD ti TR 6 MIDDLETON, 11355 5W IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD • OR 97223 ittMY It ^ ^�,rtttt� ri y4i'� 7f.tM1.Y r t log t tlll''': ,Yn h�: ae, �f "7')'•.r /�I 18134AD 00 'S,vi`;r • o • n e • LAIMOTHE, FRANK A DIANA L 11356 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 1S134AD- .00500 ..................... PETERSON, REJI T 11360 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 18134AD -00700 TAYLOR, WILLIAM R AND RUBY 11364 SW IRONWOOD LP TIGARD OR 97223 1S134AD -00900 DAVIS, PETER SAND MARY A 11374 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 1S134AD -01500 ........•. • • • ..•• • SULLEN, PATRICK M 11377 SW LAKEWOOD CT TIGARD OR 97223 3,S134AD- .01700 .44.1bootosioe04.6iiscri JADIN, JAMES POWELL 12639 NE 109TH KIRKLAND WA 98033 1S134AD- 01900 MYRES, DANIEL J TAUNA A 11369 SW LAKEWOOD CT TIGARD OR 97223 1S134AD -02100 .•.•... ............. MONTY, MICHAEL P 11365 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 18134AD —02300 a23oo .., HOLCO, BURTON T 11357 SW IRONWOOD LP TIGARD OR 97223 18134AD -02500 . ....... .••.. i NDERSON, G'OHN 9 HENDERSON, MARY. 11353 SW 7RONW06D•LOOP TIGARO OR 97223 • ar�� ayJ,�r'.:.xtrlX�• 7,1!� r�'�f� screw i�ie l 't'17i 1 5•r�?, t 3v�: r�.. l�u.�:t ,f.. ` ..�. ` F.'zn f r y,�;: ti.S'IrJ i. •i ;r"�',:,'� <.'t. a.:rJ$ n. -- -:. + +..'}1 t.` f,l ,ti +.. , .r.. •`. �,;� v qi tt :i4 �� +v,v.p a �,�. 7• ,+1�r(r_.:,5.,. .fir .t +...!' „,., 1S134AB -00100 •4 .. O ........ NARRINGTON, THOMAS R 105 FREMONT AVE SUITE B LOS ALTOS CA 94022 1S134AB -01 ........ HO, PHILIP XUAN AND LUU PHUONG NGUYEN 11330 SW IRONWOOD LP TIGARD OR 97223 1S134AB -01100 . SCENOLL, RAYMOND A AND BEATRICE H 11332 SW IRONWOOD LP TIGARD OR 97223 1S134AB -01200 ........ •...... • . • •.. FREEMAN, LINDA M 11334 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 1S134AB-01300 ........ TOWNSEND, FENTON AND ESTHER H 11336 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 18134AB -01400 SOVA, ROSALIE MAY % SOVA, CRAIG J /SANDRA C 11337 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 18134A8 -01500 . • ..•...•.........o. HENLEY, GEORGE A & SHARON L 11335 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 18134AD- 01600 ........e... •..,..o HALL, LYNN H AND VIVIENNE E 11333 SW IRONWOOD LP TIGARD OR 97223 18134AD -05000 KLETTKE, RICK L AND RENEE' 10826 SW 108TH CT TIGARD ei 400 ......... OR 97223 1S134AD -05100 LINDBERG, ALLAN B AND CHERYL A 10800 SW 108TH CT TIGARD 1S134AD -05200 a......•••.e•• ••...• HARROLD, ROSEMARY A 10805 SW 108TH CT TIGARD OR 07223 OR 97223 1S134AD- 05300 ..... *4 HOOVER, LARRY E AN VIRGINIA L 10821 SW 108TH CT TIGARD 1S134AD -05400 ..........n........ MCCLUSKEY, JACK W AND JOYCE 7580 SW DUNSMIRE LANE BEAVERTON OR 97005 OR 97223 16134AD- 05500 ...••a••�•�••�w•.... HAWKEN, NICHOLAS 3 & MARY A 10825 SW BLACK DIAMOND WAY TIGARD OR 97223 MURPHY, MICHAEL I 10720 SW PONDEROSA PLACE PORTLAND OR 97223 18134AD-05700 stbeiiiyiwiiifisoi4.. MCCORMICK, ROBERT C /JEAN L 10710 SW PONDEROSA PLACE TIGARD OR 97223 16134AD- 05800 ...... PETERSON, DANNY R JR 10705 PONDEROSA. PL TIGARD OR 97223 1S134AD- 05900 ..•...... WILLIS, LLOYD /ERSERENE 10765 SW PONDEROSA PL TIGART! OR 97223 34AD= -05100 ..... •s .i. el ei OR 97223' 1S134AD -00100 .••••■0•••"•••:0•° TUCKER, LARRY L SOLIS- TUCKER, E MARGARITA 11352 SW IRONWOOD LOOP TIGARD OR 97223 ITV OF SENSITIVE LNM1 ,aaaNth4 1GA LPPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, Tigard, Oregon EG 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 97223 - (503) 639-4171 1. GENERAL INFORMATION PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION SW 5cholls Ferry Rd. SW Nimbus Ave. Fanno Creek Bridge 0 Lu TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. T.L. 4500 151 34AA Parcel "A" (Genel) Tract "B" (Robinson) SITE SIZE PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* 4.. a Genel Co., Inc. ADDRESS 13455 Noel St. PHONE CITY Dallas Texas ZIP 75250 APPLICANT* Oregon StateiviscOn L6U7g-Ig1""-P __E45e_IAS ADDRESS 5821 NE Glisan St PHONE 239-8674 *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the pUrchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written adthorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or stibmit A Written authorization with this application. • i 'PROPOSAL SUMMARY, The owners of record of the subject property recidest a Sensitive Lands Permit to allow Etribankment ih lade ' P11.14■1111.1.••••••.• la•oanuoMmloura CITY Portland ZIP 97213 S FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE N0. &f OTHER CASE NO'S: -------- RECEIPT NO 9o-D.034186 APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY RI-- DATE: S 8 —76 Application elements submitted: x (A) Application form (1) N/A (B)OwaerLs -signature/written authorization. N/A (C) Title -transfer -intrUMUCt (1) x (D) Assessor's map (1) X (E) Plot plan (pre -app checklist) X ft (F) Applicant' S s taacttgle (pre-app checklist) 2220G) List of OMPerty owners -and addreases within 250 feet (I) X (H) Filing fee 520,00 DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: .P.O. Number: Approval bate FludiAptitovai fteuutog. dhatZ06.• t , • . )621p/13pl0380 SW 8dh(511b..10tty ev'd S/87 Tigardi Oregon 0122$. Engineering LEGIBury ST 3. List any variance, , conditional uses, or, other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: N , 4. Applicants: To ,hta complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE A?PLICANT(S) , SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate an deed. restrictions that may attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. transmitted herewith, are the plot plan, C. All of the above statements and the statements in true; and the , and exhibits tra , attachments, g any permit issued, based on this applicants so ... acknowledge that, found ianue�auchb statements are application, may be revoked if it is any false. H. The applicant has read the entire contents of the applica'aon, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. 9 DATED this ?i-h day of --91 1 SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. (KSL pm/O737P) TO: REQUEST O COMMENTS DATE: August 134_1290 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RS: SENSITIVE LANDS SLI 90 -0009 STATE HIGHWAY _ DIVISION (NPO #7) A, request for Sensitive Landes Review approval to allow landform modification in the Fanno Creek floodplain. in order to provide for the widening of the highway and to afford adequate clearance underneath the structure for the bicycle path, the bridge must be both widened and rained. This will require extending the toe of the slope into the Fanno Creek floadplain. ZONING: R-12 (Residential, 12 unite /acre)0 R -4.5 (Residential, 4.5 unitsiaore), and I-P (Industrial Park) LOCATION: Fanno Creek bridge at SW Scholte Ferry Road and SW Nimbus Avenue (WCTM 1S1 34Ah, tax lot SOO and WCTM 181 34AD, tax lot 6301) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various d- partmenta and agencies and from oth r information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comment : =: by Auquat 3Or 1990. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If au are unable to reon spd by the above &has. please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your " soon as ponoible. you have any questions regarding this r matter, contact the Tigard Planning Dep rtznent a PO Box 23397, 13125 SW r "� Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Derr Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Pleads contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: bkim/SLR90 -Y09 : BKM 4444 4 ,J.. , FICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICA CITY DTP TMENTS _....Building 'Inspector/Brad R. Aaty Recorder Ellgineering/GarY. A. 3. SPECIAL DISTRICTS (2 copies) District (Rldk-up box bldg.) Tigard Water District 8777 SW Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223 Metzger Water District 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. co. Land Use & Tranep. 150 N. riret Ave. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Brent Curtis KeVin Martin Joann Rice Scott King Fred Eberle Mike Borreson Jim Hendryx ' City of Beaverton PO Box 4755 Be verton, OR 97076 State Highway Division t Lee Gunderson Po Box 565 Beaverton; OR 97075 ...■"*.raa ice _jg�ther CPO NO. Parks & Recreation ,Board School Dist, Now 48 (Beavr) Joy Pahl PO Box 200 Beaverton, OR 97075 School District 23J (Tig) 13137 SW.Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 0.■■••••■■•■■• Boundary Commission 320 SW Stark Room 530 Hillsboro, OR 97124 ■ METRO 2000 SW 1st Ave. portland; OR 97201-5398 DLCD (CPA's only) 1175 Court St. NE Salem, OR 97310-0590 other ................... Portland General Electric • . Brian Moore 14655 SW old Scholls Ferry Beaverton, OR 97007 ■ Metro Area Communications Harlan Cook Twin Oaks Technology Center 1815 NW 169th Place S-6020 Beaverton, OR 97006-4886 it it 4 4 ei 4 it 4 4 ei '0 it O 4' 4 4 4 I it 5. ,SPECIAL AGENCIES General Telephone Mike Lutz 12460 SW Main St. Beaverton; OR 97007 NW Natural Gad Don Thomas 220 NW' SeCond Ave. portland, OR 97209 I - • of •Oregon, 3.606 $0• Bond . • • • • Poi,*14kidi OR 91201 Inthe VM;V:600'1. ....■■■•■■•■ US West Pete Nelson 421 SW Oak St. Portland, OR 97204 STATE AGENCIES 6. „ Aeronautics Div. (ODOT) Engineer Board of Health Fish & & Recrea. Div. Subdivision Supervisor „ Dept. of Energy, Dept. of Environ. Quality 7. FEDERAL AGENCIES __ Corps. of Engineers Post Office __..... DOGI Division of State Lands commerce Dept.-14.M. Park LCDC PUC Fire Marshall 1--- -- Other Other _ _ Southern Pacific Transportation Company Duane M. Forney, PLS - Project Engineer 800 NW 6th Avenue, Rm. 324, Union Station Portland, OR 97209 x,'44'. . ', 0z SEE MAP IS i 270C 09. 4,604 CS,1403 NE 1/4 4 SECTION 34 TIS 6� WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON SCALE I" 100' SEE MAP IS 1 2700 C.S. 11,299 SEE M4 1S I MAD C` 3g SEE f,M SCALE I " • 100' t I VISO el REMAINDER OW/ „ 6N MAP s 1 27x SEE MAP s27 CS. 14,003 • ia I 34A8 It 3///03 SEE MO Is I 34A.A a N OLE Woo0 tik Is 1 34k A TIGARD , 11 1 SEE MAP IS ► :°AAA '4 ` SE 1/4 NE1/4 SECT �',< 34 1'1S RIW W.M. leant WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON 111. KO, !Aain, .0 SCALE I" • IOC munroaa. .^.1., \t ro uilwun fItlWN __ uAr n i t+An�; ti — -MATCH _.... �. _._LINE' in 0 6200 TAX LOTTED 'in 6301 t „ I1 N,65AC, ON NAa .fib lO. jiAC. .' ► j III 34AA ► 52-29 ,1 JI�C�� IIr'i.JJi. 0 '1 �' 1'' N , 1k 11 4. 54 C) 6tT 1oI 53 loo 52 1100 T,so S.W. n•�dta'W to ,a 3160' re0 7 it b 29 a 28 gi b 27 1 %RCEL A COQ AA PUOLIC TAM( b last sirii I 9 OIe40teW TRACT °A" NOM SEE MAP Is ► 34AC 44'0 23 p 24 ova n'yt c ,• tlSeY 28001 tW. 4600 33 3400 2 i2 8600 two T cc , 10 ,r H b _ ,. m.. .._ .r-:.: ... _ a.. -.. -rte. .. a .. _ _ r. -.. .>. -... � . -. _ __ :. .. ♦ , —'e.: �. 4. •. A.. _ r s .ire . ..., _.._ _. -:. ... .t...... .. e. -. eY _ ...: _.... r.. . -..s 'w... 3• _ C' - — >.Ya ['v�. > , _. c... «.. _- -. - - s _ - s _ s _ Y'.. - .. -..a,. �... x r ... _ x - -:<. - : 'N 1 '"D � ......7 �R_ -.,. •N w: � `.'`. .: _. -6;t- ?> � •_ .<..�1�_ ° �F tisj -- �;.r♦ - F �i f e� '1. } ,e :'i �.�,, i r Z s.+6" ,{ _ LEGIBILITY`STRIP .. ._ ..... _ ,.._. _;.. ... ,...�. ..., •n...,: r •-.... _. ... �......__.. «_. >�� - . ,e... z . ',:. -. '• 'ter , t . s .-k > x., . rr . ..s_ - r I NIMAINOt PIO. ON MAP IS 111A A —MFEHT tr LINE It I • I t% t t I \ \ rJGARD 6301 10,114c, 6200 14,64Ae, Is I 3,41A ottiaAmoss stottoi ON MAP 111 344 .BUsi N ss • sib 006 21 s st ° 1,65 Ac, • CNTF, 3 TRACT "A LAN0s6APE � STORM DETE T1ON .1/4.(1' 5400 )0, 49oo 3O z 23O .1 CANCCLLIO TAN Lots IMO, IMO% !GOO, .23110 .... N -b .0 tl 4loo 5 4koo EL, 066 4600 " OL't boi 11: 13S.Wo WINDSOR AJ • ft TRACT C503 HAll u , Is 34DA ��I 7100 SEE MAP IS I 35130 FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY 00 NOT REIN ON FOR ANY OTHER USE SEE MAO IS I Ma IA 60, T1GAIRb 18 .1 84AD .; • " ' " • • • • ' • rt. tt.t. • SW 1/4 NW 0/4 SECTION 35 T IS F11111, 1 WASHINGTON ,COUNTY OREGON SCALE I" 1006 SEE MAP I I 34 AD 20O. 600 e \ft 500 1.44 Ac. `to • 11 0 • SEE Mt IS I 3: • •••■11 101 23 71— CASCADE 11 0. 700 900 101 •0 23-10 • THS—ti co*, SEE MAP, IS I 34DA 11 35- ■r& 1100 4,P, 4e. SEE MAP IS I 34A6 7C0 1900 4. 45 43 $ 47 ! ��--++ L, W L 1J �+� 2000n1 2100 2200 1h 1 i 49 so �N 30D LOOP' 400 33 I ow a n to n 300 32 X00 100 31 30 I • • 00• eta t ►460 n."*"1""mia"."" c.ek 1.952 SEE MAP IS i 34A0 2625 Ire,il,. $26 183 2821 lee INITIAL it OINT.' Netiielie i acti. 7340 U40. K ea' G -...,. ca. T,Til ..... W Jai ..Oe'ii.... I tN IS' a 08.4 141.$ N ef. et' N 0460 !.2342 omit* tee lots ttao,tl0a,teae,teeo, sEE Mt41 is 13m ettt e. 'tea ei't eat cS. I,9ei eeNii'i 444 WO'et'[ i1i.e ►toll 4111 MATeil IiY; 0011, deal 4 kteoL p M4 14 1,1 u"jr W e44 ie' ii etthe W it ie' if tie ream TNt t P4 eonstnti iiiikrotai Wig me Itl 111t1 *11,01046 • I S 54A C r. STATE OF OREGON PURgHASE ORDER PAGE , . oBl�,.► OREGON STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION 438 TRANSPORTATION BUILDING e SALEM, OR 97310 TERMS F,O.B. DELIVERY REQUIRED AGY -ORG. UNIT OA-001 0 VENDOR NAME AND ADDRESS 415218 TELEI'I LONE NUMBER F DELEGATED AIJTHORIT`i COrE 776!g4I Ode _ Z3 ITEM NO, VENDOR NUMB . A /SUFFIX 75'0 F; INVOr;:t.g I vise, a 4 M t -.....k. .erteti ..o40f A !`),0 '. C::DE , 1 INSTRUCTIONS TO VENDOR ALL INVOICES MUST CARRY THIS PURCHASE ORDEts NUMBER, PREPAY ALL TRANSPORTATION CHARGES UN. LESS OTHERWISE STATED IF TRANSPORTATION IS BILLED AS SEPARATE ITEM RE- CEIPTED FREIGHT BILL MUST ACCOMPANY INVOICE. STATE IS NOT SUBJECT TO FEDERAL EXCISE TAX. EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT OB J. QUANTITY ACT. DET. ORDERED UNIT RECEIVED UNIT PRICE ITEM TOTAL RECEI I certify the above Ito is are Within current budget alloWances, .b: •ED BY TOTAL $ 0 oo i cErtlfy these iternS ere authorized by the Dept of Geh'I Services. AUTHORIZED AGENT •7 APPkiOVED CH ECK NUMBER ACCOUNTING Lit ONLY Y IP THIS ITEM IS CODED ENTER bob, NO, As REF. boc. ITEM NO E PENDITURt ACCOUNT INVOICE NUMBER QUANTITY bC1CLitn NT Nd 5 87 0r CP •SH::. ,I' O1JNT t' 0 t yei: /+w:�H'.:.+•.�+«bwi w M.uiu.w....,i�:i 1F:w4+ rt j i"r i 3 4Q ,Vu .5LR 90oo " 1S1341W —U9bUU •• <+ •O•0•M••••• • •• HOWARD —KIM /NC /09 00 NE 6TH 3.: SUITE 900 BELLEVUE + WA 96004 h. -vin !r....,r ) b 11— M 44,1;:, ^ ti .t nn Mai a= :ratwa : p Au #� �"w�arar= ��t+r�`u� t:r�tN � 4iQt. )F1 S,W, Hall Blvd. Box 23397 Oregon 97223 y ))1\1-, q �p ywu //��tt�� ��pp,,ryry '15134AD 0930V a••ees•e••hoo••• &n«. ECART/NGER, CRAM AND UE,.,'MARY KAYO r► 14110 SW 112TH AE# TIGARD '#i=WA4 T u w 779. .W T'; l'' nrg unt Toe, 52-R 90 -ove s7,-, Alto 1S134AA,"'O1400 •�e...... 4... LIVING xTON, ROBERT F 11735 SW Tti LATIN RO OR 97062 �r J TIN •. a,�y 4'� t��,�� MY44' A�xf"' x� „i q',i, LXVIINOftriliq t t't4E3 e# iN " E A 1' MURRAY BLVD. v TO O R TU T FA NVs Pazr NO GnRrE G( BRIDGE SCHOL L S HIGHWAY SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT APPLICATION INFO SITE PLAN PROJECT MANAGER: LOUIS SPISLA PROJECT DESIGNER: KIRK HAMPSON DESIGN FILE NAME: MFMAP.DG'N DESIGN FILE LOCATION: r1225bi''usr /8010 SCALE: 1" • 50' CONTOUR INTERVALS 2' CONTOURS NOT FIELD VERIFIED EA'' 1341435 l 000 •- 900 DATE: JULY 27,1990 100 YEAR FLOOD. PLAIN EL EV. 162.3 $1 Ll. IQ 6.1 LEGIBILITY STRIP WILKENS WILKEN3 GREENWAY WEIR 33 .RCHERON' LN HAWKS BEARD St' CA � City CAP MAAIEANITA CT- T« IGARD TH£RINE- 33 CT. RC.. NOODAR WALNUT S: MARIE FONNNER ALBERTA' ALBERTA- CHARLES TIOARb SCH. fl. • 9'14, ° HIGHWAY DIVISION SUBJECT: epr.4.' " , tor ' 1 4 m '. ceo DATE: c. r w , , U 7)6. `c`1' WYE. 44,0 ett-km4-4. ®' 69 444,A/it 4440 7:!Og ViggZeP ate%'' 4."7144/24-` 7100 V Voye..4 real- /tie) 44-7-ecx.,,dc t.4.• P4OP,44-05"4> Aio 7714 TUHM i §tHifi :a . HoULti DETAcH sN SHOULD REPLY# DETACHING SHEETS RETAINING SHE a WO 1 AND RETURN RETURNING Sa EET NO 2 T Tr DEa , � ADDRESSEE TO 51EN + 0�2. t i3.i220 rRi� 5801 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: 11,„pm13 1990 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SENSITIVE S SLR 90-0009 STATE HIGHWAY orvisxog (NPO #7) A request for Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow •landform modification in the Fanno Creek floodplain. In order to provide for the widening of the highwai and to afford adequate clearance underneath the structure for the bicycle path, the bridge must be both widened and raised. This will require extending the toe of the slope into the Fanno Creek floodplain. ZONING: R-12 (Residential, 12 units/acre), R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units/acre), and /-P (Industrial Park) LOCATION: Fenno Creek bridge at SW Scholia Ferry Road and SW Nimbus Avenue (WCTM 151 34AA, tax lot 500 and AMTEN 151 34AD, tax lot 6301) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by &met • You may use the space provided below or =attach a separate letter to return your comment . If ou are unab e to res.ond b the above gatag: please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: _Agillmsgrimis_ PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: bkm/SLR90-09 .BKM NEIL GOLDSCHMIDT GOVERNOR Department of Transportation HIGHWAY DIVISION Project Manager 5821 NE GLISAN STREET, PORTLAND, OREGON 97213 MURRAY BLVD. - FANNO CREEK SEC. SCROLLS HIGHWAY WASHINGTON COUNTY SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT NARRATIVE August 7, 1990 In Reg* Rotor to Filo No. OVERALL PROJECT The Oregon State Highway Department is currently planning to upgrade the level of service of the section of Scholls Highway between Murray Blvd. and Fanno Creek Bridge in Washington County. The project involves the widening of the present highway to include four lanes and a fourteen foot median, the addition of three traffic signals and the Oonstruction of a six foot sidewalk among other improvements. The total length of the project is approximately 1.84 miles. SENSIT/VE LANDS AREA A connection is planned between the Greenway North and the Tigard Park Lands to the South. This be made by a path leading under the Fanno Creek eastern termintis of the proiect. Park area to the connection would bridge near the In order to provide for the widening of the highway and to affotd adequate clearance underneath the stricture for the bicyCle pth it will be necessary to both widen and raise the bridge. The • net effect will be to extend the toe of the Slope into the Fanno Creek 0.60a. plain, 764-to06(7:67) • ".7" . • • • %!%,••:,,J% 7; ; Y. a *; to n A'•:.YA r .'. 'Cr4Yt. f.ri`1 .1 :�' t+ l +r �- . "5 /a {rr `tR� t...�Yi.i ��•Y %.f r.�A �r f MURRAY BLV67T9"D VNNAO NS fi0C14TAR7g EK BRIDGE SCHOL L S HIGHWAY SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT APPLICATION INFO SITE PLAN PROJECT MAMAGER: LOUIS SPISLA PROJECT DESIGNER: K1A t1 %MPSSON DESIGN FILE NAME: MPMAP.UGN DESIGN PILE LOCATION: r1215b/usr /9010 CONTOUR INTERVALS 2' CONTOURS NOT FIELD VERIFIED EA# 1341435 / 000 - 900 DATE: JULY 27. 1990 GritlEINVOL, °JUL' 54:34 OREENWAY OR, PRIM a. SCOUT Nori N Orty FONNIR CHARLES ". TIGARb SCH. gORANTN, FA.v FAT° N (00 4- tOOc p ex, i4 • . pitAokp cgeerk .1' / . .poor 444.4._ scat/011S FORRY ft 04 D 44. .ie /00 y e ckr P/06,4 pliattO • • /406... bat July 30, 1990 Inc. Architects, P.0 A,rchrtecture • Civil Engineering • Development Services • Landscape Architecture • Land Planning • Urban Design • Surveying David W. Bryson, Hydraulics Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation State Transportation Building Salem, OR 97310 Re: Hydrologic Analysis of the Prop Bridge Over Fanno Creek Project No. 2837.1 i3ackground tr sed Modification to the Scholli3 Ferry Road p for Tasks 1 and 2 of the subject study as required under item 24 This is to ask 2 of the Scope of Services. The study was undertaken to determine if the proposed under T p �' enlarged opening for the Scholls Ferry Road Bridge at Fanno Creek would significantly reduce the upstream storage effect and increase peak flow discharges downstream. Summ, a It was fotr through HEC -1 computer analysis, that the proposed bridge produces a negligible effect on downstream peak flaw. At Tiedeman Road the increase in the 100 year flood under existing development due to the lose of storage is calculated to be only 0.29%. At a point immediately downstream from the proposed bridge, the increase is calculated at 0.55%, This effect is not considered to be significant because it is much which less than. the 3% difference p study. still w r future develop. was set as acriterion as Mated in the Scope of higher. They fare however, deer 1 within the 3% slightly gh mint conditions, final results for exi tri hydrology are presented in Table 1, and those for future hydrology are presented ` __.____g Y � p . _.. .. P in Table 2: Based on this analysis, no further investigation of alternatives is recommended, Further details on the analysis of results are presented below under "Discussion ". For in the analysis are contained or future reference and documentation, a1.1 computer files used in he HEC -1 output files are attached along with mpanyi�lg diskette. Hard copies oft fi on the acco a list and description of how each file was used in the analysis, Separate hard copies of input files are not included because the output files contain a reflection of the input. 100 -Year DjgehaxU . . i.. t Corps y discharge bridge 2380 cfg according to the �,o s of engineers' Note that the 100-year dischar at the brill is g' rp ` Flood Insurance Study This value was not p , although ,.. hell in the ms. . the Fl a �. u this out because our eta s model Used in t it was used in . pointing y g m the HE C-2 model for that study. dy We are vs, discharge curve Umlauted ted the 100 -year discharge as 2680 cfs, Lake OsWego OHO, i 1355 5 W •6oenos Party Road ' Lake Oswego Orede,i- 07035 • (SO. ) 635 =361 S • Rlfkfarid Ofilce, 5 Cetilft l Way #305 : Krtklarid, Washington 56033 tz06) 6g5�b346 Vandbuvef Ofilca, 101 East 5ih 'SOW Vancouver, Washingion 986615 (b6) e2 ,6dds David W. Bryson, ydraullcs I,ngineer July 30, 1990 Q ®a De eni f Ta n ®rt2tio _Pi m% iVl[odel ins Aim corresponding HEC -1 model first required interpreting thTranslation u u e the a }1Y model deY This is represented in the attached schematic (Figure 1). the structure of the l- P This structure was also checked against the drainage basin map (Figure 2) as used in the Tigard Drainage Master Plan. This schematic actually represents four separate HYMO models ge . The correspondence bet joined together in a single structure as it as modeled in �1 stir Figure 1 to the diagram Figure 1 and the EEC -1 model can be easily checked by comparing produced by the output from EEC -1. Translation of input variables from HYMO to EEC -1 was done as follows: Description HYMO CARD ID (field #) variable Basin Area DA BA (1) SCS Curve # CN LS (2) Time Step (hrs.) DT IN (1) Time To Peak TP lI (1) For several HEC -1 routing reaches, it was necessary to translate the HYMO routing data to a form that would be ��C-1: The HYMO routing data is in the form of Cross meaningful to Sectional Area Vs. Outflow at each node, while EEC -1 needs to have routing, data ass, Storage Volum. Vs. for each reach between nodes. The translation was Outflow average upstream d accomplished by calculating . .. between the erns lished b calculatin a voluune at each reach based on an of tthe u stream an d e discharge i areas given in the HYMO input multiplied by the th reach �i� e at the downstream , downstream sections . Each obtained was then related g ach volume thus obtain � p Volume ,,�® few cases it was to extrapolate e the flows � r cross section. � aaec��� to handle Storage ®QducQd. Since Outflow curve beyond the data given to allow the model t p the curves were ne.. l this extrapolation will not produce significant error: generally rally fairly straight, this, The results of the initial translation are in the output file FANMTCH.OUT• utflo. at Reservoir �toraae,..- O w i y i method of estimating the storage vs. P the bridge, One refinement accomplished in this study was in the Ludy (Tigard DMP) discharge relationship at the reservoir above �: In the former study C-� model for this :p the HC .... � � in HEC- was used � in the HMO model was derived from values ut of ., 2 w . , 4 to give this relationship same reach. The variable various discharge VOL Laty ;p ® ase on a reach volume as computed from cross - section areas and reach relationehap. This is based distances, l David W. Bryson„ Hydraulics Itngineer July 30, 1990 ®re, tia ra P ar tmeart of ¶ ins rt ation Pa e 8 In this study a contour map was used to give a Storage Volume vs. Stage relationship. This map (1" = 100' with a 2' contour interval) was plan `metered for contours upstream of the bridge and these areas were used to compute Storage volume vs., Stage. This information was then combined with the Stage vs Outflow relationship provided by ODOT to produce the Storage volume vs. Outflow relationship requl&'ed by HEC -1. This same method was used for both the Nexistin' and "proposed" bridge configurations. This is considered a refinement, because the complex terrain cannot be accurately represented by cross- sections as done previously. The result of this refinement is that at the 100 -year discharge, the newly determined volume is 27% lower than that used in the Tigard Drainage Master Plan. This may partly explain the minimal impact of the proposed bridge. Model Calibration After producing the basic model with input data matching that of the earlier HMO model, it was necessary to calibrate it to produce discharges as close as possible to those of the published Flood Insurance Study (FIS). The new HIEC -1 model was calibrated to the FIS values rather than the HYMO values, because the FIS contains the official published discharges. Also, the H YIVIO model itself was calibrated to the FIS values: Note that both are P "existing". Although the FIS only P condition . and are 1979 development referred to here �asl� ex� igtThese discharges re resent the 1979 2 discharges is the drainage basins � � Y P � � ` being modeled, additional discharges from the FIS model were published in the Tigard g i Master Discharges A total of eight di were published that can be related to nodes Dr the NEC -1 model, at these nodes were used to calibrate the I-]' C -1 model, The an , T eight nodes and discharges used for calibration are listed in Table 1 along with discharges as in Field 2 of the LS card in the HEC-1 Y adjusting number" 1 in ut: In some cases the rating curves • s modeled by HEC -1i Calibration was accomplished b a ustin the CS curve number values he ra ing cuY es f ®r the routing reaches were a usted on the "SW and "SQ " cards. In all cages where ib, . i. ... c� . � n calibration adjustments were made, they are noted in comment lines on the HEC -1 input. Discussion , i. basic a roach of this +stud used a IEC -1 model that was calibrated approach Y �libr to the discharges derived As discussed above, the b ge by Corps Engineers for the Flood Insurance Study published in 1981: This approach was taken because �the e published discharges are accepted widely.." b public agenda After obtaining results from this approach, another approach was tried to help confirm the results. It was thought that the calibration process may have changed the model 'existing" w ",,: a .. end .., :: , : , . , i l .. . ri .. in a way that would affect the e result To further confirm the results a similar comparison of vs, proposed bridge openings was performed with the uncalibratsd model. This calculation Method indicated that the proposed bridge would impact downstream flows by approximately 0,5%, This confirms the earlier conclusion: S!. .'i ql?I!>, ♦,i tt� r,,1 .a7 ,..., ,.v4.1 a.�. ?..., �1 ..Y� -Yti1.. n4 ?. :t.... !a r..)�,t ^;1.(... «. ..1 r, �,...: .:.yak.. «. ��1.. h.u'.Fv •Fh:. "t�cP 1�TAnuamu.� Hydraulicsear Jul 30, 1990 on D . nrtme +;t of Tra rtat;en A third way of viewing the results is to look at the "future" discharges. Table 2 presents the p condition. " model was not calibrated HEC-1 results for the future development conditia�a. �� tconditioi�.e. Judging from the available from the F regarding f � g extremely small cchanges as shown on Table 2, it is very unlikely that refined calibration of the �' change significant between the "existing' model would char the results enough to cause a w's a difference of 0.66%, while the and proposed bridge designs. The uncalibrated model shows a criterion for "significant" was 3% as stated in the Scope of Services. on a io , indicates .. proposed bridge opening will The analysis performed for this study iicates clesrl that th® ro os® � -1 computer model hat not significantly increase downstream peak flows. This is based on a HE T using the Stage vs. Discharge data supplied by ODOT and the hydrology and hydraulic data from the 1981 Tigard Drainage Master Plan. We consider this to be OTC a final report on this project, ae no further analysis is recommended. However, we will be pleased to carry on any further work that you may see necessary. Please call if you wish to discuss this report or our recommendations, 635 -3618. Sincerely, Sincerely, Roger C. Sutherland, P.E. Senior Water Resources Engineer Project Manager RCS/lj Enclos ure Lewis G. Scholl, P.E. Project Engineer TABLE 1 100-Year Peak Flows ( f) (Existivg Hydrology) . - . . - C: -1 UNCALIBRATED - - -- -....0 RA►'1`�I� - -�„ ... MODEL MODEL CODE Tigard With with Study DNS' Extg. Proposed Location (Node #) FIS HYMO Bridge Bridge Increase 2,000 ft Upstream 1,580 1,620 1,674 1,580 1,880 of Nicol Rd (1) 400 ft Upstream 1,870 1,870 1,896 1,867 1,867 of 86th Ave. (4) Highway 217 (7) 1,970 1,970 2,056 1,98E 1,985 Scholia Fy. RO d (10) 2,380 2,060 2,196 2,362 2,375 0.55 Ash Creek at its 1,000 960 979 974 974 mouth (12b) North Dakota St. (12c) 2,700 2,780 3,120 2,683 2,693 0,37 Summer Creek at 1,450 1,200 1,266 1,397 1,397 its mouth (24a) Mclennan Ave. (24b) 3,850 3,930 4,254 3,845 3,866 0.29 Location (Node #) 2,000 ft Upstream of Nicol Rd. (1) 400 ft IJpstreain of 86th ,Ave. (4) TABLE 2 100 -Yew Peak Flows (cfe) (Future Hydrology) -- vnar�s�osrr� With With Extg. Proposed 91 Bridge Bridge Increase Highway 217 (7) Seholis Fy. Road (10) Ash Creek at its south (12b) North Dakota St. (12e) Summer Creek at its mouth (24a) Medenian Ave. (24b) 1,992 1,992 2,217 2,217 2,394 2,394 2,719 2,737 0.00 1,088 1,088 3,348 3,368 0.60 1,771 1,771 4,815 4,820 0.23 it A'A A AA.A,AA • A 3 RE I. ea • it t � o P P d h A t'e b APcRIrT ti ketiltitturii Seivi6es LifidiCdpe Aidhiteth.416. 1.104 Ukiah ilikigh tUiVeywiti PROJECT Jou NO tiV ck, DAtEe"1-1 OF 4,, .ti.4i .)a r ;,. ff �a c�,�... °ti �,iR� ae +.a ,� �L y .11 "ei• #� ?, �. �� L�� • • • 0 0 0 • 00 4 ■ • Divison of State Lands 775 Summer Street NE Salem, OR 97310 To: From: Subject: EMOR Reviewing Agencies Waterway Permit Section Permit Renewals ." ctober 24, 19.91, DUM RECEIVED PLANNING OCT 2 8 1991 We have received requests to renew the following Removal or Fill permits, In each case, suitable applications and plans were included with the existing permit, and no changes are planned. Number RP 355 RP 621 RP 1226 SP 1783 RP 2134 RP 2400 SP 2462 SP 2878 RP 4617 RP 4679 RP 4946 RP 4969 RP 5937 RF 6938 ftpkgilt Jay Ellsworth Curtis Loa:am Calapoola R., Unn Co. commercial removal James River IL Inc. Columbia R., Multnomah Co. maintenance dredging Thompson's Mills Calapoola Re, Unn Co. channel maintenance Ernie Bussman Sixes 12,, Curry Co erosion control OSU Yaquina Bay, LIfIC0111 Co, Maintenance dredging Newberg Ready Mix Co. Willamette R,, Marlon/Yamhill commercial removal Robert Hoskins Rhea Cr, Morrow Co, erosion control Louis A, Goff Snake R., Malheur Co, erosion control City of Warrenton Columbia R, Clatsop CO, barge MOordge Obl:W Tanner Cr., Multnomah Co, dredging Teeco Corp, Umpqua 0„ DOUglat CO, Umpqua removal City Of Wcittenfori 1 eWIs & Clark R,, CicitsOp Co, teMOVal OSHD #648 Unnamed Cr„ Polk Co. highwdy imptovetneht OSHD #666 SuMMer/Fatind Cr, Washington road improvement PledSitt leVieW Out tile dOplet 6f these dppliccitions arid respOnd with your comments AS SOON AS POSSIBLE if you hoed a copy of the earlier appliCatIOn, please Call the Permit Section at 378,3805, ObPW dOpi have been Sent JO Pctily 8how and fhe following bikgIst b181-011 EOIONS: bOn Bennett TIM UntetWegner John J-lakton Php s Jim Joy Massey Gelid 1-letb 126h t-idStelthan baVe Loomis Bob Buettehdh Harry Lott stove MaitiOydd Gene SteWitiii John Johnson Ray Perkins Jim LaUman Ron tiattelS 4 A , ,j4Fabrin6o56, & Hiteon Creek ;'?"' JOINT APPLICATION FOR PERMIT Hurray Blvd. - Fanno Creek SCh011 s Hi ghwaY Washington County WHEREAS Department of the Army permits for proposed work in or affecting navigable waters of the United States, the discharge of dredged or fill material into those waters, and the transport of dredged materiel for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters are authorized by Section 10 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899, Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1977, and Section 103 of the Marine Protection Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, respectivety,---AND---permits for that part of those project activities which includes the removal or fill in the waterways of Oregon of rock, gravel, silt, and clay are authorized by the State of Oregon Under O.R.S. 541.605 to 541.695---THIS APPLICATION WILL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF BOTH AGENCIES. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS STATE OF OREGON, DIVISION OF STATE LANDS For Agency Use Only State of Oregon Corps of Engineers # 7149 ■••■■•■■••■6111/0•■•■•••■■■•■•■•••■■10111/01M1/0■1 Date Received ,••••■••14.1 • Name River Waterway SU mmer,_fpno, & Hiteon Creekcs --- Date Received Local Name Same 1...a..1....•••••■••••■■••...1.••••■•• Section 33 & 34 Township 1S Range 1W WM Estimated Starting Estimated Completion Date of Project Fall 1990 Date of Project Fall 1991 NAME OF AUTHORIZED APPLICANT Oregon State. ligilay Division AGENT Address Transportation Blinding. Room 211 mcirelm City, State, City, State, Zip Code Salem. OR 97310-1354 zip Code_ Area Area Area • • • Area Phone: Work (503), 378 6265 Home ( ). Phone: Work ( Home PROJECT SUPERVISOR Bob. Area rea Phone: Work (503) 229-5495 Home j.. - PROPERTY OWNER IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT N Address city, state, zip Code Area Phone: Work ( PROJECT fiat), 1403, M.P. 11.82 :Sti:1611S AbbitESS IigitgLIjU2 dity, tOtaitYi State, lip Cede , • Assessor's Records" 1i Shawn an Nap Tax Lotff Area Name of ( Nome subdivision `" "'"' Lot - stock WNW'. In order to expedite the processing of this application, the foiloWing city Odd/or coUnty department, which has a local jurisdiction oVer the proposed project, has been contacted: Name of pepatiment: WAS.ihttin_g____LIOAU-L---k—t—Olahhih_g_ggPartMerit Address: 150 N. First ST Hillsbortc„.,OR 97124 Phone 4681 „ APPROVALS OR CERTIFICATIONS applied for or already Obtained from other agencies (Fedirai, interstate, state/ county, city, area) for any 64 the OopoSed projects described Ih this applications idsit,hLigAgsrloy Lpprovsi identification Ratultlepilention N/A NOP OorM 358 OCT 1980 i4W1-04,80 4 Ni4"aey age6cY denied approval for tho ctivity described herein or for any other a Yes X No If Please explain in Remarks. eity directly related to it? ADJOINING PROPERTY ON THE WATERWAY: Give names, addresses, and phone numbers of owners and/or occupants. Tualatin Hill Park & Recreation District, 15707 SW Walker RD, Beaverton, OR 97006. City of Tigard (Park Easement), 13125 SW Hall, Tigard, OR 97223. Genel Co. Inc. c/o *Iona Payne, 13455 Noel RD Suite 1750, Dallas, TX 75240. Chester L. Robinson, 10330 SW Scholls Ferry RD, Tigard, OR 97223. Angelo & Rose A. Cortese, 15175 SW Sunrise LH, Tigard, OR 97224. Mr. Norman Brandvold, 13775 SW Old Scholls Ferry RD, Beaverton, OR 97005-6102. George R. & Marla J. Stroemple, PO BOX 1810, Lake Oswego, OR 97034. L. B. Nelson Corp. - No Known Address. Glenborough Westside Assoc., 333 Twin Dolphin Drive Suite 600, Redwood City, CA 94065. PLEASE EXPLAIN IN DETAIL your plans to restore the area to its natural condition. All new and disturbed soil surfaces will be shaped to blend with the surrounding terrain and Will be seeded or revegetated as is .appropriate. Also, see excerpts from the Revised Environmental Assessment and the Wetland Mitigation Plan (Attached). INFORMATION FOR FILL OR REMOVAL: FILL WILL INVOLVE. X Riprap X Rock REMOVAL WILL INVOLVE ______cubic yards annUatly, and 2812 cubic yards for the total project. X Gravel X Sand Silt Clay Organic cUbic yards annually') and 583 cubic yards for the total project. X Rock X . Gravel X Sand X Silt Clay -------- DESCRIBE IN DETAIL THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY---its primary purpose and secondary pUrpose, if any,-6-intended use (priVate, public, commercia0---tYpe of structures and use---type of Vessels Using facility--,fadilitids for handling Wastes--'type of conveyance and manner of ektraction of any fill or remoVal-6-the opantity and Composition of, and the source and disposal sites for any fill or remoVala (If additional space is needed, Use plan sheet of paper.) SEE ATTACHED NARRATIVE Roadbed lli.. summer tett. & Wetlands 1,394 CU. yds. HiteOnCrk.& Votiands, 015tu. yds. • fAtinu.......ttk, & Wetlands . • 4 687 cu. yds. Total . .04 24756 tu, yds, Riprap..............., . . . . 139 co. yds,..Oulvett) • 20 cu. yds. , . . 244 to, yds. Culvert • . . i /01,...1g,_ydt.4',...tiiidoo).• • 56 Cu .. yds: i . . 583 CU. yds. Application la hereby wade for a permit Or permits to authorize the activities described herein. I certify that I On teMilier with the information contained in this app LicatlOn, and that, to the 'beet of r knowledge and belief' such information is trUe, coinplete, and acCUrete. I further Certify that I poaaett the authority to Undertake the ptopoted activities. SignatUre / 460,1, PPlicanfor Authorized Agent 16 Usc i661 provides In peett HWhoever i. any the jurisdiction of any 4004etient. 4 of the United .6tatea. 1(.nowtngly and wittiwity faLsIfIes a 0liter/it:feet. Or iiiiiteienY40104 0. 4 4. atateaioncoe • U000 any false „ a a eheit be fined nOt Mete than tiiii666-oe topi,i0ehoihot more theh.tive..yeata;'oe. both, . • Proposed Activity -- ^^ WIVE OSHD# 656 Summer, Fanno, & Hiteon Creeks Murray Rd. - Fanno Creek Section Scholls Highway Washington County NARRATIVE, The existing 1.7 mile portion of the Scholls Highway is a two lane roadway with so11e left -turn refuges at intersections and no bicycle or pedestrian facilities. This construction project will improve this section to a four -- lane roadway with a continuous left -turn median, shoulder bicycle lanes and sidewalks. This section of the Highway crosses Summer, Hiteon, and Fanno Creeks and Widening their associated wetlands. Wideng of the roadbed embankment will impact • application (quantities) the attached n�lan� she is s on A the to permit lof 0.8 Acres wetland p (areas). e impacted. These impacts will be mitigated by expanding, restoring, and improving an existing wetland area along Hiteo . Creek, to the left of Engineers, Station 1065 -° 1070. The proposed wetlands mitigation is detailed in the attached plan sheets. The existing bridge over Fanno Creek will be widened to accommodate the new roadway width. It will also be raised to meet the improved vertical alignment of the roadway & to allow a bicycle path to to constructed underneath the finished hed bridge. This will connect the north & south sections of the Beaverton Tigard Greenway Path currently broken by the highway. There will be some excavation and backfill in the stream to construct a retaining wall for the bike path. In- stream work will be confined to the low stream -flow period and the project specifications contain, antipollution and antiturbidity stipu lro . All excavated t d mater ls will be deposited in an upland area away from wetlands areas. • Murray Boulevard Fenno Creek Bridge Washington County, Oregon M-9234(-) N AL ASSESSMEN and Final Programmatic Section 4(t) Evaluation June 1990 OSHD # 656 Summer, Farmo, & litteon Creeks 41111111......nualmoNeil bepartment of Tralitportation Federal HighWay Adnimistrttion Oregon Department of TrahspOrtatiOri FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT for Oregon Project M- 9234( -) SCROLLS HIGHWAY WIDENING Murray Boulevard - Fanno Creek Bridge Washington County, Oregon The FHWA has determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the human environment, This finding is based on the attached Revised Environmental Assessment which has been independently revioWed by the FHWA and found to adequately and accurately discuss the environmental issues and impacts of the proposed project. It provides sufficient evidence and analysis for determining that an environmental impact statement is not required. The wild Alternative has been selected for constru project Will widen this 1.7.mil a section of the Scholls Highway to four lanes lus a median left tum lane and p j construction. The g y p Will add bicycle lanes and sldt►waiks. Traffic noise barriers will ba constructed at selected sites and the Wetland impacts of the project Will be mitigated by the enhancement; protection and enlargement of a nearby existing wetland. The FHWA takes full responsibility for the accuracy, scope and content of the attached environmental assessment. • Alen 4 � . R; Steger Asst Division Administrator Oregon Division, Salem Oregon. ILl Wetlands Determination 4 Wetlands Determination Wetlands are "areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support... a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." (33 CFR 323). The project crosses Fanno Creek and some of its tributary streams (Summer Creek, Hiteon Creek) (Figure 4). The project earthwork will unavoidably affect several areas of adjacent stream-related wetlands. All of these affected areas have been previously disturbed by various human activities (filling, mowing, stream channelization, excavation, tilling). Many, however, still have hydric soils, wetland Vegetation and periods of inundation or saturation during the growing season, which qualify them as wetlands. Adverse impacts to these wetlands will be minimized by keeping the project on the existing highway alignment. Impacts which cannot be avoided Will be mitigated by acquiring, protecting, enhancing and enlarging part of the nearby Hiteon Creek wetland. 4.1 Impacts The wetland areas directly impacted by the project are shown In Figure 5 Widening the bridge approachee at the Fanno Creek will fill strips Of Wetland 20.. feet Wide on both .eided, Fanno OreOk turns and 'parallok i. the highway for a short distance as it exits the bridge. This channel will be displaced a feW feet further south (affecting the adjacent tipanah. Wetland atea). to acoothitiodate the wider At the .HiteOti. Creek crossing :(heat Englewood Park), wetland habitat which has developed in the itad&de ditches and ah Open section of the creek 'will' be buried by the highway widehlhg • The northward extension of Boones Behd brio (121st Avenue), requested by the City of Beaverton, will fill into the east edge of the 4.5- acre Hiteon Creek Wetland. The project crosses a small tributary of Summer Creek just west of the Scholls / Old Scholls intersection. This area in the fork between Scholls and Old Scholls appears to be declining as a wetland because of changes in drainage and ditching associated with nearby development. The highway widening will fill the north edge of this area. At the Summer Creek crossing, the highway widening Will remove the vegetation and fill approximately 4000 square feet of Wooded wetland habitat along the south side of Old Scholis Highway between the Davies and Murray intersections. Relatively undisturbed for several years, this area has developed an oVerstory of Oregon white ash, a rnidstory of river dogWood, and a heavily shaded groundcover with of sWordfern, eqUisetUrn and spaghnum moss. The presence of impermeable subsoils and a , constant supply of water from seepage maintains saturated surface soils year-aroUnd. The following table summarizes the wetland Impacts of the project. See the appendix for More detailed descriptions of each Impacted wetland area, Location Wetland impacts SUmrnr Quality & Size (do ft) of Wetland. Area to be Filled. • Low Med High Fenno Cr 2000 10750 EngleWOod Park 6000 2000 Booties bend Dr 3000 4500 Forest Glen 1600 DaVies,MLlitay 4000 Totals 6000 1150 8500 The tow wetland ated•ki .06 filled by the project is approximately 3318$6 equate feet, or 0.8 acre. a LEGIBILITY STRIP J I Figure 4. Wetlands and Waterways. This highway project crosses Fanno Creek and several of its tributaries. The highway will affect the streams at the crossings by lengthening culverts and widening Fanno Creek bridge The circled numbers correspond to the areas in the detail maps in Figure 5 LEGIBILITY `STRIP WeLL nd to 6s 11led FM7MM.7.1 Figure 5. Wetland Impacts. The highway widening will fill narrow strips of land along wetlands, ditches and riparian zones The : stippled areas is the maps indicate: wetland areas which will be filled:. Most of these areas are at the edges of existing highway fill: filling wetlands and culverting ditches will increase the amounts of surface water runoff. Wetlands Determination -14- ,..••.. r A__..r "1 iM1 '.tii. `:h r Ir .. .�'. i .� 1 � 1 ,•4.:. 'r A`. ._ .. � r. :AiY., .. ... �, i tn' 4.2 Mitigation 4.2.1 Background Wetlands perform many valuable functions such as surface water retention, purification and slow release, groundwater recharge and flood control. They also support Wildlife habitat and fisheries and provide a scenic and educational backdrop to soften the urban environment. Existing wetlands should be preserved whenever possible. When filling cannot be avoided, it is important to replace wetlands so these important values are not permanently lost. 4.2.2 Existing Conditions at Mitigation Site Part of an existing 4.5 -acre Wetland along Hiteon Creek (Figure 6) will be enlarged and enhanced as mitigation for the unavoidable Wetland impactsof this project The area has the water supply, soil types, Vegetation, and slope aspects Which with proper restoration and protection can support a high - quality Wetland habitat. Over the past decade, this Wetland has been declining as a result of surrounding urban development: a underground sanitary sewer has been installed down the middle of the wetland; the creek has been channelized and deepened' tillage has gradually shifted upland soils onto the northerly wetland margins; the fill for a major apartment development has encroached on the south side: two new sewer connections from the apartments again recently disrupted parts of the Wetland, Hiteon Creek is noW a straight, steep- sided ditch which tends to drain rather than feed Much of the Wetland, Nevertheless it persists, attesting to the basic conditions which created it The existing wetland is now bounded on the south by the toe of the fill created during the construction of Scholls Terrace Apartments, The West boundary is 125th Avenue, and the east boundary is Booties Bend Drive (121st Avenue), The existing northerly boundary has been determined, as shown in Figure ei using hydrology, vegetation and soil characteristics as Indicators. This is a PalUstrii a Persistent Emergent wetland containing areas of standing water and saturated soil which support wetland vegetation including rushes, cattails, sedges, skunk cabbage, willow and ash trees, horsetail, scouring rush and marsh grasses (meadow foxtail and tall fescue). 4.2.3 Description of Mitigation A two -acre permanent wetland easement will be acquired for the proposed mitigation (Figure 7). Approximately 1.4 acres of this will be existing wetland in which the wetland habitat will be restored and enhanced. The remaining 0,6 acre is currently non - wetland which will be excavated and graded to enlarge the wetland area and improve its boundary conditions. The total mitigation area must be larger than the amounts of wetland directly impacted by the project: Construction on the highway and the wetland mitigation site will cause temporary reductions in total wetland area Time will be required to fully establish the new Wetland. The wetland improvement will also replace some of the water quality functions affected by the project This is particularly important in the Tualatin River Basin, where development Is water quality - limited. The excavations, low earthfill dikes and wiers will be constructed to create ponds and raise the local Water table. In the existing wetland areas to be regraded, the topsoils will be removed, stored, and protected for later redistribution in the mitigation area once the new grades are established. This will provide seeds, spores, and Vegetative parts from the existing plant community to supplement specified plantings of Wetland species, The existing sedge /rush area Figure 7 Will be disturbed as little as possible, since it is established and functioning relatively well The project will Improve the water regime of this area and it will be supplemented with plantings of other native wetland species, The dikes will be located to intersect the sanitary sewer manholes, This Will permit access to the Manholes without disturbance to the marsh, 1. IMENIPANISTINIMENir LEGIBILITY STRIP tise-Lher, Beaver Lon School DisLricL HiL eon Are. ExIsLingl WeLlonci 210 6 a. LI or 3- C 0) _C La Schal is Terrace Apartments 0 0 03 6 7 I Eta 200 I. Approx._ Scat. 5cEi0 is Figure. 6-. Hiteon Creek Wetlandi Mitigation Area. The area with the 'grass" hatching contains Palustrine, Persistent Emergent wetland which is declining as surrounding development intrudes. It has excellent potential for wetland restoration and enhancement The cross-hatched area has been selected as the mitigation site for the highway project. LEGIBILITY STRIP` Pond hi- gm lon Boundory. 210.- Sedge /Rush Areo Figure 7. / ttand IVIitigation Conceptual Plan. The project, wetland mitigation area is enlarged here to show a method for restoring this wetland~ Ponded areas with islands and shallows will be created to Improve and diversify the wetland environment. Native wetland species will be planted Much of the existing sedge /rush area and trees will remain, but will have an Improved waterre9trne The area will be protected by a wetland easement to be held by Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District: Wetlands Determination 4.2 .4 Minimizing Adverse Impacts At all stream and wetland sites along the project, as well as at the Hiteon mitigation site all construction operations will: o Minimize construction activity in existing wetland areas during the spring -early summer nesting period. o Protect the adjacent downstream wetland areas from silts exposed in the construction area Minimize compaction and other disturbance to wetlands outside actual construction areas. o Wetland basins along the project will be clearly identified on the ground, and prohibitions on their use will be written into the contract. Filling, materials storage or disposal, equipment storage, washing, or operationai use of any kind Will be specifically prohibited by the contract. Contractors will be required to provide a separate performance bond to ensure compliance with these provisions, o Shrubs and trees, such as Pacific willow, will be planted at the toe of fills bordering the wetland basins to reestablish existing structural diversity as rapidly as possible. o Accessible boundaries of the Wetland will be planted with trees and shrubs which discourage intrusion. 4.2.5 Monitoring and Coordination The final design and construction stages of the wetland mitigation will be monitored by the ODOT Regional Environmentalist and reviewed by the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Department before approval, During construction, the Construction Project Manager will notify the Regional Environmentalist at the beginnings and at the completions of major project activities at wetland sites. The wetland mitigation for this !project is being coordinated with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District, Oregon Division of State Lands, Corps of Engineers, Environmental Protection of Beaverton and Tigard. Agency and the [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] iniagEMERIENEWINEWASZASSEEnatim REQUEST FOR CONFIRMS DATE: FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SENSITIVE LANDS put 900009 STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION (NPO *7) A request for Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow landform modification in the Fanno Creek floodplain. In order to provide for the widening of the 9 y hi hv.�a and to afford adequate clearance underneath the structure for the bicycle path, the bridg e must be both widened and raised. This will require extending the toe of the slope into the Fanno Creek floodplain. ZONING: R-12 (Residential, 12 units /acre) , R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units /acre), and I -P (Industrial Park) LOCATION: Fanno Creek bridge at SW Scholl° Ferry Road and SW Nimbus Avenue l (WCTM 151 34Ah, tax lot 500 and WCTM 1S1 34AD, tax lot 6301) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment this application, your comments by tu °t 20 . ,J ay use the space provided b or attach a separate letter to return your comments. =MR - ar ®4nable to ree axd by the .abov_e_ date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and soon as possible have any 9 contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO confirm your comments in writing as g Nations regarding thi ®matter, c Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639- 4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer_ PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact • of our office. Please refer to' the enclosed letter. Written Coent s as. Name of Person Commont Phone Humber: bkm /SLR90-09. ERA$ • y 41 AUG23 1990 t;l f'V -(0 1 10.0 pi.ANNeNG 0E�f= =EDUARD= CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Jerry Cdfer, Associate Planner FROM: Greg Berry, Utilities Engineer RE: Sensitive Lands SLR 90-0009 Oregon State Highway Division August 22, 1990 Description: The applicant proposes to fill in the flood plain of Fanno Creek to provide for the widening of SW Scholia Ferry Highway and to afford adequate clearance underneath the bridge for bicycle path. Findinm: 1. The applicant has submitted a hydraulic analysis to determine if the proposed enlarged opening for the Scholia Ferry Road Bridge at Fanno Creek would significantly increase peak flow discharges downstream. The study concluded that "The proposed bridge produces a negligible affect on downstream peak flow". 2. The applicant has reported that the permit as required by section 404 of he Clean Water Act has been approved. 3. Subsection 18.84.040 of the Code requires that "land form alternations help Preserve or enhance the maintenance of the zero flood rias floodway and shall not result in any narrowing of the floodway boundary." The ordinance further requires that "Where a land form alteration or development is permitted to occur within the flood plain it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100 year flood". Although not shown on the submitted plan, it appears that the proposed fill is entirely outside of the zero fOot rise floodwcy. Since the applicant has shown that the fill will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100 year flood, that application should be approved. Recommendations: le The applicant shall notify the Engineering Department 48 hours before beginning work within the flood plain. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman (phone: 639.4171) 26 An erosion control plan Shall be Provided as part of the public improvement draWings The plan shall conform to "Erosion Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, November 19896" STAFF CONTACT: dre0 Berry, Engineering Department (639-4171)6 APPROVE handy R. Wooley, City Engineer d3/GH:01r90-,09 ENGINEERING COMMENTS: OREGON STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION SLR 90-00 PAGE 1 - • •• • • • • • TO: Keith Liden, Sr. Planner FROMz Ron Bunch, Associate Planner August 22, 1990 SUBJECT: Park Board Comments on SLR.-0009 '44 k. The Park Board's comments in reqards to the above project that the bike path connection was well designed, usable, posed no obstacles to usage by pedestrians and bicyclists. concerns or comments except that they were pleased to connection being made. focused on assuring safe and otherwise They had no other see the bike path • i2.it .r'�.., ��'"., 4`''i� ,. '� a,.:.�. r•x:, . ,`. " •••1 , PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: SLR 90 -0009 FILE TITLE STATE HIGHWAY DIV. APPLICANT: OREGON STATE HIGHWAY DIV LOU SPISLA 5821 NE GLISAN STREET PORTLAND, OR 97213 OWNER: City of Tigard PO Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Chester Robinson William & Constance 1200 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: Applicant requests Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow land form modification in the Fanno Creek f loodplain. In order to provide for the widening of the highway and to afford adequate clearance underneath the structure for the bicycle path, the bridge mget be both widened and raised. This will extend the toe of the slope into the Fanno Creak floodpisine LOCATION: Fanno Creek bridge at SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW Nimbus Avenue (WCTM 151 34AA, tax lot 500 and WCTM 181 34AD, tax lot 6301) ZONING DESIGNATION: R -12, R -4.5, and I -P COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION. Medium Densit y Residential, Low Density Residential, Industrial Park NPO NO: #7 STAFF DECISION TIME a - PLANNING COMMISSION DATE ,/ / _ -- X HEARINGS OFFICER DATE _A 28.9.9. TIME 7 CITY COUNCIL DATE / _I TIME REQUEST �.y FOR COMMENTS attached list) R_ DT URN 8 Y /_ / TTRCNTS,%ICINIxYMAP LANDSCAPING PLAN _ _ NARRATIVE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN STAFF CONTACT PERSON: Jerry Offer PREPARE FOR PLANNER APPROVAL: X ADVERTISEMENT - TIMES / / OREGONIAN .. / / X NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS TO BE MAILED / / LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATION //.,,_, NOTICE TO DLCD - ATTACHMENTS: TO: Jerry Offer, ABSOCiate Planner August 16, 1990 Greg Berry, Utilitiee Engineer40 RE: Sensitive Lande SLR 90-0009 Oregon State Highway Division Descrivtion: The applicant proposes to fill in the flood plain of Fenno Creek to provide for the widening of SW Schoils Ferry Highway and to afford adequate clearance underneath the bridge for bicycle path. Findings: 1. The applicant has submitted a hydraulic analysis to determine if the proposed enlarged opening for the Scholia Ferry Road Bridge at Fenno Creek would significantly increase peak flow discharges downstream. The study concluded that "The propoeed bridge produces a negligible affect on downstream peak flow". 2. The applicant has reported that the permit as required by section 404 of he Clean Water Act has been approved. 3. Subsection 18.84.040 of the Code requires that "land form alternations help preserve or enhance the maintenance of the zero flood rise floodway and shall not result in any narrowing of the floodway boundary .° The ordinance further requires that "Where a land form alteration or development is permitted to occur within the flood plain it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100 year flood". Although not shown on the submitted plan, it appears that the proposed fill is entirely outside of the zero foot rise floodway. Since the applicant has shown that the fill will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100 year flood, that application should be approved. Recommendations: 1. the applicant shall notify the Engineering Department 48 hours before beginning work within the flood plain. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman (phone: 639-4171) 4 2. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, NoVember 1989.° STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639-4111): APPROVED: Randy R. Wooley, Ci4Engineer d3/GB:d1r90 -09 ENGINEERING COMMENTS: onEdoN STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION SLR 90-09 PAGE 1 r. f • 01: feCi RE: SENSITIVE LANDS Spa 90-0009 STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION (NPO #7) A request for Sensitive Land m Review approval to allow landform modification in the Fenno Creek floodplain. In order to provide for the widening of the highway and to afford adequate clearance underneath the structure for the bicycle path, the bridge must be both widened and raised. This will require extending the toe of the elope into the Fenno Creek floodplain. ZONING: R,-,12 (Residential, 12 units/acre), R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units/acre), and I-12 (Industrial Park) LOCATION: Fenno Creek bridge at SW Scholle Ferry'Road and SW Nimbus Avenue (WCTN 1S1 34AA; tax lot 500 and WCTH 151 34AD, tax lot 6301) • Attached is the Site Plan ,,nd applicant's statement for you* review. From information supplied by various departments and aaencies and frnm information available to our staff, a rep preparad and a decision will be rendered on TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE 84 RESCUE AND If you wish to comment on this application, -, 29,letter to return your comments. If vOu *rc BEAVERTON FIRE DEPARTMENT ...12,N,. You may use the apace provic ;. AlAtqL please phone the staff contact note , . , confirm your comments in writing as soon r, GENE BIRCHILL rm questions regarding this matter, contact th: Deputy Fire Marshal/ Maas Examiner Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 9 503-526-2502 FAX 526-2538 STAFF CONTACT: 2mEry Offer 4755 S.W, Grif ith Drive • F3eaverton, Oregon 97005 PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: tf, ft 4. 41t, Name of Perdon Commenting: Phone Number: bkmi5LR90-09.B4H • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO* ULE DATE: AjAmo FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SENSITIVE LANDS SLR 90-0009 STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION (NPO #7) A request for Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow landform modification in the Fenno Creek floodplain. In order to provide for the widening of the highway and to afford adequate clearance underneath the structure for the bicycle path, the bridge must be both widened and raised. This will require =tending the toe of the slope into the Fenno Creek floodplain. ZONING: R-12 (Residential, 12 units/acre), R.4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units/acre), and I-P (Industrial Park) LOCATION: Fenno Creek bridge at SW Scholia Ferry Road and SW Nimbus Avenue (WCTM 151 34AA, tax lot 500 and WCTM 151 34AD, tax lot 6301) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by &lima 2.g12_JAng- You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If vou are unalamjauemeocdam the above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your 'comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-417/, STAFF CONTACT* PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: m We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. 11■101•1•1■114111M11= Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Commente:,--4EL—Jaa2alaae..--r-4.24..,---27h4E---r1.6.10-27 Y.4 Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: bkm/sLR90 REQOEST FOR COMMENTS TO: DATE: A_ ugtast FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SENSITIVE LANDS SLR 90-0009 STATE HIGHWAY DrvwxQN (NPO #7) A request for Senoitive Lands Review approval to allow landf oria modification in the Fenno Creek floodplain. In order to provide for the widening of the highway and to afford adequate clearance underneath the structure for the bicycle path, the bridge must be both widened and raised. This will crodpinin. slope into the Fanno Creek floodplain. ZONING: extending (Residential, the 12 units/acre), R -4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units /acre), and I -F o Creek bridge at SW s Ferry Road and SW Nimbus Avenue ((WC= 181 �34AA, tax lot 500 and Scholl rY WCTM 181 34AD, tax lot 6301) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be the proposal in the near future. prepared and a decision will be rendered on t If you wish to comment on this application, we need your commente by augp.gt You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments- able _ to respond, by t above date lease phone the staff contact noted unable with your comments and a.. p p confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: . Jerry Offer 4 PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING /TOSS TEAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Comment in Phone Number: bltm /SLR90 -09. BKH U hn P Miller • Admih.stratot maim!) NANNING IWGi 199 FILE NO: FILE TITLE: APPLICANT: PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION SLR 90 -0009 State Highway Division Oregon State Highway Div. Lou Spiala 5821 NE Gliean Street Portland, OR 97213 OWNER: City of Tigard PO Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 o Creek flood plain. In order to provide REQUEST: A request o Sensitive Bann ands Review papproval to allow landform modification for the widening of the highway and to afford adtiquate clearance underneath the structure fotr the bicycle path, the bridge must be qu the too of both widened and raised. This �kllflQOdplain�� ®n�Z ZONING: R -12 the sloe into the Fanno Creek 12 units /acre) R sera), R -4.5 (Residential, 45 units/acre), and 1 -P (Industrial Park) LOCATION: Fenno Creek bridge at SW Scholia Ferry Road and SW Nimbus Avenue (WCTM 1S1 34AA, tax lot 500 and WCTM 151.34ADi, tax Lot 6301) NPO NO.: 7 NPO CHAIRPERSON: James Boylan PHONE NUMBER: 626-0640 CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: STAFF DECISION COUNTS ARE DUE BACK. TO STAFF ON - PLANNING COMMISSION HEARINGS OFFICER CITY COUNCIL ATTACHMENTS VICINITY MAP` NARRATIVE SITE PLAN DATE Off' HEARING: TIME: 1989._ DATE OF HEARING 111.2812g_ TIM : 7 :00 p.m, DATE OF HEARING: TIME: STAFF CONTACT: Jerr3_t7£fer...: b/0-09 B LANDSCAPING PLAN ARCHITECTURAL PLAN OTHER "r,720 Vt.itt EGIBILI f STRIP' Department of Transportation HIGHWAY DIVISION Project Manager 5021 NE GLISAN STREET, PORTLAND, OREGON 97213 OVERALL PROJECT The Oregon State Highway Department is currently planning to upgrade the level of service yf the section of Scholls Highway 0 between Murray Blvd. and Fannie' Creek Bridge in Washington County. The project Involves the widening of the present highway to include four lanes and a fourteen foot median, the addition of three traffic signals and the construction of a six foot sidewalk among other improvements. The total length of the project is approximately 1.84 miles. MURRAY BLVD. - FANNO CREEK SEC. SCROLLS HIGHWAY WASHINGTON COUNTY SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT NARRATIVE August 7, 1990 In Reply Rotor to Filo No. .i64,1i39ti SENSITIVE LANDS AREA A connection is planned between the Gteehway Park area to the North and the Tigard Park 'Joao, to the South. This connection would be made by a path leading under the Fanno creek : bridge near the • eastern terminus Of the project In order to provide for the WiAehihtl of the highway and to .• afford adequate clearance Underneath the structure for the bicycle path it will be necessary to both widen and raise the bridge. The net effect will be to extend the toe of the slope Into the Fanny Creek flood plaih4. scitions Fag Ry R0440 •4•,• 41 4 '...' 41* '411 /06 • 80.1- I r, A ploo,t ipickriv *0, ,-.,,' qii* .."(-" 1 1' 1144 • 1.1. Od 't,.•'„ cgEeet( .,.. ... ... ,. 4. ■ '4' ...1 "I., CEI , ..',.., ILI ....i „ ,• ,,•, ; t i• .., 4 1 ° 0 r lep.., / / 6---A RD iacci po-.4:. .i ., . t , • 41 141 • .- . .. .. . ... .. - '! c t. ._Y. - s .; F. . ... « a. .. . � - ..Yr k..: .- . ..: -..3 e R♦ ,,_ .C-s ._- . . _ .,.'. : s:.. r ' '� .rog:..^ .-.. , -..'.. _ ^ _ . - ; it- _ - Lf:v JZ'_ - _ s_ Y_ } .: •,� '.. F` - T: Y - - ^, T ' 2 r • • • ax. . . L � re, : �. '. :l` F � .s . C•. 5:. :x fi.. _L.. i _:s- ; - t.5. � t ._- �' [ -.t : cK ,� - iY is .p' .•- : t_ ._ _.Y £. . .rr W t; d ,r � t (. t Y c st� . .:,-. -7,1:,-..,,:,,,,,..:_1-- .._ . _'.: ._. ! - '4= . . 'Y Yx: "'F .. fi: �a. - _ _ t� -♦ ' -x V':_ :_ i ..7Y,: _ ... ?- .. i e _ _ :: . ! _..cj. .. r _ k -'� T: _ -'s _ S __ Me i. . ' , .. . .. -' . •."'___. k- ?- ., .y -•_ c• -� F - ^#., , . ..S. _ =5_ +. k, «, -*-°'::-;.,'; -�. �'. t 7 L. . . .T. .-_,. _ yA _ c. ... __ -.. . • - . ter. ! t. -' ..i^..,, .:.e, _ : . . F .. _. a .: . A Department of HIGHWAY DIVISION Project Manager ',821 NE GLISAN STREET, PORTLAND, OREGON 97213 MURRAY BLVD. - PANNO CREEK SEC. SCROLLS HIGHWAY WASHINGTON COUNTY SENSITIVE LAUDS PERMIT NARRATIVE 9VRALLPBOTE August 7, 1990 In Reply Rofer to File No. The Oregon State Highway Department is currently planning to upgrade the level of service of the section of Scholls Highway between Murray Blvd. and Farm° Creek Bridge in Washington County. The project involves the widening of the present highway to include four lanes and a fourteen foot median, the addition of three traffic signals and the construction of a six foot sidewalk among other. improvements. The total length of the project is approximately 1.84 miles. SENSITIVE LANDS AREA A connection is planned between the Greenway Park area to the North and the Tigard Park Lands to the South. This connection would be made by a path leading under the Fanno Creek bridge near the eastern terminus of the project. In order to provide for the widening of the highway and to afford adequate clearance underneath the structure for the bicycle path it will be necessary to both widen and raise the bridge. The net effect will be to extehd the toe of the slope into the Fanno Creek flood plain. 040) . '4` ,1* ; "4" t,4- • 't ,„ 4 ..*:.`„ 0" • oruocv DEPAMS r OP rtwanortrArrov MURRAY BLVD. TO FANPJO CREEK BRIDGE SCHOL L S HIGHWAY AY NE LANDS PERMIT APPLICATION INFO SITE PLAN • PROJECT MANAGER: LOUIS SPISLA Pl?0JE'Cr. DESIGNER: KIRK HAU1PSON DESIGN FILE NAME: MFNAP.DGN DESIGN FILE LOCATI0*11 rIP25b /usr /8010 SCALE: 1" CONTOUR INTERVALS E' CONTOURS NOT FIELD VERIFIED EAR' 1341435 / 000 — 900 DATE: JULY ET.1 990 ZOO YEAR FLOOD PLAIN ELEV. 162.3 LEGIBILITY STRIP Nor IN CITYL 4,44 FAN ERT0 N 0 ioo /ecAr Io 4— 0 . pitNIVP , cREE'l< SGIlOflS F lag y go4D itoo yecor Mooct FA Amo cAK eel( )00 yemv, rioecl +.0 MURRAY BLVD. TO FANNO CREEK BRIDGE SCHOL L S HIGHWAY IVE LANDS PERMIT APPLICATION INFO SITE PLAN PROJECT HANAGER' LOUIS SPISLA PROJECT KIRK N UPS DESIGNER: DESIGN FILE NAME MFMAP.DGN DESIGN FIL AiION: r1225D/Usr /8010 SCALE: 1" 50' CONTOUR INTERVALS 2' CONTOURS NOT FIELD VERIFIED EA. 1341435 / 000 900 DATE: JULY 27. 1990 6.1L‘.7f ®li.d l I a7 -I: FILIE PROGRE8S • 29 Zr wE 32 33? shut* CHEROM LN. WINCAAILL. Ri 4AW KS BEARD ST MANZANITA C7 LHEICHTS. CREST( DR. STARK RES. SUMMER. THERINE 33 KAT. au, KATHERINE CT. ROL W000AR PARK WALNUT' ST FONNIR ALBERTA CHARLE! MARC WI. ; »" pp nfil'� CIRCUILATE. BR 7 RW KV ANEMENEEMOSCESEIMagigiaMENI Staff Review CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PRE—APPLICATION CHECKLIST ENO 4-kevOrree 6Rer. eaNv J1,1,4y- 197o Fr- LX8 tu , 1. APPLICANT 2. PROPERTY LOCATION Address Tax Map/Tax Lot 3. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION /NECESSARY APPLICATYON(S) -:u ,`J PE k A. USE Existing Adjacent Property north south east west A .CONIPREHENSP E , PLAN DESIGNATION 6. ZONING DESIGNATION PD.. .4 . � • 56-7.) 6 f 0) E. LA MO �©5 ' L..4 /N Pat 10J4 -v To deerk ASS ae,4A -"7" „ 1 o% St oets 7. , NEIGHBORQlOOU PLANNING ORGANIZATION NO. PHONE 0. CODE REQUIREMENTS N6i.nimim lot size/Width Setbacks frond co " Special setb 1s 'streets loUer intensity zones flag lot accessory structures. ``laxi.mUa lot coverage ._.. .. ..._,... Maid tmUm buu ld ing height CHAIRPERSON Ott/ r. ' L. A) aho /i 8 prAteitym4 Horz&---cc Ads --6alY side rear . as wetlands zero lot nine _special height ''' nits flag lot Oe�l. i ty calculation • Landscaping: ini % of lot alr-ea Street Trees Buffer Areas Parking Areas. O E- •Vi$ l clearance -A° Vs e 2$0 �f V y /;,te ' ' Parking and loafing Weem a i•8 ahoe. g Access and Circulation - Signs ,OIVIER CONSIDERATIONS (See application checklist for p ac fic inns) • Sensitive lands: .f1ooJp&ain Orals09984f • sl pe Itiet]1ands • , `ipen spacel iilazt on c overlay • A A • Street 'i uprov rtes /connections / k • UNIMMOOPIIM Fighp-of-osay dedication. San ewer isirovement storm sewer 8 mprovements 4 Improvement,Agreement aPe .t asp Fees • Other ency pereaits o. RocElMiRI i dvittidast state staff, • �obti.c t3 •'a. eg earaa s Officer 6�iab�.ac Neaaringi Plastreairt Cotottusoioo i L. • The Ad einist ra �lvg - docfsaon or • Public Wearing shall occur approximately 30 days rafter a co to ,appl ,catiof + is filed 40-day appeal period . fullers all decisions.' (0573P/0022P • io.rAtle.; f COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE plpylaEjt,andards z. Th Hearings Officer shall make findings that all of the following riteria are satisfied when approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application req4e0 ti192111thg122:410aV f102222.41.33: 1. Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage fUnction and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any narrowing of the floodway boundary; 2. [The] [1]Land form alterations or developments within the 100-year floodplain shall be allowed only in [an l areas designated as commercial or industrial on the comprehensive plan land use maldilL emejA__that Alterations' or develo.nents associated with'communit ecreation uses utilities or ___tf"i2M.----;..:'---------titJbliosur.esasdefin_ed 0S111------rtr 18 h2_sShec__nuwa°°deghallbe, allowed in areas desi. ated residential sub act to a-Jte licable E2Bing-EWANC421. S. 3. Where a land form alteration or deVelopment in permitted to occur within the floodplain it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year flood; 4. The land form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan, unless the construction of said pathway is deemed 'by the Hearitlis Officer as untimely; 5. The plans for the pedestrian/bicYcle pathway indicate that no pathwall' will be below the elevation of an average annual flood; 6. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineer° and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained; and 7. Where land form alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the comprehentlive plan. This area shall include portiond of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrianibicycle pathway Within the flccdplain in accordance with the adopted pedetltrian/bicycie pathway plan. The birector shall make findings that all of the following criteria are satisfied when -•approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application request for a sensitive lands permit on slopes of 25 percent or greater or unstable ground 1. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than that required for the use; 2. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in eroeiion, stream sedimentation, ground .instability, or other adverse on -cite and off -site effecta,or hazards to life or property; 3. The structure® are appropriately cited and designed to ensure structural stability and proper drainage of foundation and crawl space areas for developonent with any of the following soil conditions: wet /high water table; high shrink- swell capability; compressible /organic; and shallow depth -to.- bedrock; and 4 Wher e natural Vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration for development, the areas not covered by structures or ` impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.100, Landscaping and Screening. irector shall make findings that atiafied when approving, approving application request for a sensitive 1 ands�peacanit_ within drainageways. visor.. all of the following criteria are with conditions, or denying an .. 1. The extent and nature of the proposed land :foram alteratiodi.or development will not create site disturbances to the - extent greater than that required for the use; 2. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on -site and off -site effects or hazards to life or property; The water flow capacity of the drainageway is not decreased; 4. Whe'e natural vegetation has alteration or development, the inipervioua surfaces will be fccordance with Chapter 18.100, been removed did to land form areas not covered by structuroe or replanted to prevent erosion in Landscaping and Screening; i) 5. The drainageway will be replaced by a public facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum flow in accordance with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan. 6. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained. 7. Where landfc rm alterations and /or development' are allowed within and adjacent to the 100 -year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian bicycle pathway plan. (Ord. 89 -06; Ord. 87 -66; Ord. 87-32; Ord. 86-08; Ord. 84-29; Ord. 83-52) csz 07- 5- • "" owe- e � • i �V r)5 k Staff Jo 6 Date CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be brought and submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call Planning at 639- 4171. BASIC MATERIALS A) B) C) D) E) F) (G) (H) ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED: Application form (1 copy) Owner's signature /written authorization. Title transfer instrument Assessor's map Plot or site plan J ,�I ' Statement — Percri�pT DH d ' 7" Applicant's stateme List of property owners & addresses Willi i 250 feet Filing fee ($ _ 5 ) SPECIFIC MATERIALS A) Site information showinj (No, 1) 2) 3) 4) U) of copies i[ Vicinity Map Site size & dimensions Contour lines (2 ft at 0 -10% or 5 ft for grades a 10%) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds 5) Locations of natural areas hazard areas including: a) p as b) Slopes ih excess of 25% c) Unstable ground d) Areas with high seasonal water table' e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential f) Areas haliing severely weak'fouhdation soils L ocation of resource areas as shown oh the ComprehehsiVe Map inventory including: a) Wildlife habitats op Wetlands Other site features: a) Rock outcroppings i b) Trees With 6" + caliper Measured 4 feet from ground level W►14l4 /4t) YY clerk dVe 0) Location of existing structures and their uses 9) Location and type of on and off —site noise sources 10) Location of eXisting utilities and easements 11) Location Of e)iisting dedicated right-of-ways Site, bei,elopment Plan shoWi (Noy of copies 1) T pr hopsed site and surrouhding properties 1 ) The hetohe intervals 3) The location, dimensions and names of all= a) Ekisting & platted streets & other public ways site atnd oh adao and easements on the s ini.hg properties Atipi, cATIoN CtiECkLIST = Page:1 ; Y,• b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site. c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension 4) The location and dimension of: a) Entrances and exits on the site b) Parking' and circulation areas c) Loading and services areas d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation e) Outdoor common areas, f) Above ground utilities 5) The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent propertY within 25 Feet of the site b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 7) Sanitary sewer facilities 8) The location of areas to be landscaped 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 10) The location of mailboxes 11) The location of all structUres and their orientation 12) Existing or, proposed sewer reimbursement agreements 1) C3 3 C 3 C 3 rrr C) gr2E11.092121.2 (Mo. of copies 11 ) E 3 The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1) The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization proposals ; and time of year it is proposed to be done. 2) A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual sUbStantiating: a) subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report E 3 b) The Validity of sanitary seWer and storm drainage serVice proposals C 3 c) That all problems Will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated I 3 D) ArthitectUral DraWinqs (No of copes ____ 3 The site deVelopment plan proposal shancludet i) Floor plans indicating the square footage of all strUctUres ProPosed for Use on-site; and -° 2) Typical elevation drawings of each strUctUre, E) Landscare Plan (No, of copies )! I 1 The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicatet 1) bescription of the irrigation system where applicable L 3 2) Location and height of fences; buffers and screenings I APPLICATION CNECkLIST Page 2 Ii k 0 :04 4 [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]