Loading...
ZOA93-0003 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. '-Citywide 9 $i'" 1 •' ! ^=.:-.:,:,F.-6.;a,[«.`ta..k�as�,.ry..,;•u">�.u....v.>rm�:•,� w•m„�wz.N..�...Ya.c,!».., ca.a,..csaa.gw+.=wsr. w+a�w�r&wi�...r�"�+m�. a I, i Y ra •A! • 4, k rF 1. f— .L AVM M� ( r' ,`. 9 ' ll t { ' M1 i r . PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO CPA 93-0004/ZOA 93-0003 FILE TITLE: Transportation Amendments 4 APPLICANT: City of Tigard ti , 13125 SW Hall Blvd. *;• Tigard, OR 97224 REQUEST: To amend the Comprehensive Plan and Development Code to permit z.r ' narrow local streets and encourage pedestrian, bike, and transit use. k` LOCATION: Citywide *, APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.98, 18.106, #_ 18.108, 18,120, and 18.164, ZONE All CIT: All •r,'. CIT FACILITATOR: CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: STAFF DECISION 1f ` X PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: { HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: X CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: 4/26/94 TIME:7:30 .P.m. • THE FOLLOWING ATTACHMENTS ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION: VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN NARRATIVE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN 3s ` SITE PLAN •� OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Carol Landsman :- 639-4171 .?1 • { k.t, 1 � �: j1 f f• w' ..y 1 Y ; : x, .1,(.0 44 , (")J • t { PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION " FILE NO J ‘ ;� Ci"•" d!3 0°C)° ' / 2toA RS 0066 FILE TITLE. Jiyetv*volimdrion °rlq rmeas. x 1 � . APPLICANT: COI OWNER: y REQUEST: Y � -i x j 7 e d t,V , oAosej 4 P', LOCATION CA5- a (1J-61 .e.• ' J APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA $ I�,►�G J� t 1 1 . k-• �',�.L• ry����+�✓ •`. 4 a 4o I d tD b * T e . 'a'Q« o P, �. • i a .. s. j. W , t ,_ -j� Lf ,,, a CITi CIT FACILITATORS Ar1 � * ti CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: ,° r - STAFF DECISION :1 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARINGS TIDIE S at ', HEARINGS OFFICER Z DATE OF HEARING: TIME: :} v CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: 4 t 12.1 IME: THE FOLLOWING ATTACHMENTS ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION: x<. VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN { NARRATIVE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN `.: SITE PLAN OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: a • u/Y! h jr �V I 4 i 44TH .: t?. J , L.qtr 1+:. , ' .r. , .." . 3 .1�'' i +j } 1.7. r.. 41 1 .^. }.. e � i .: - • ;is t x PLACE UNDER CITY OF TIGARD LOGO IN LEGAL NOTICE SECTION OF TIGAF ) TIMES ".-P-„, PUBLIC HEARING ; ' :,■ • The followinc,�will .be -considered by the Tigard City Council 011....42.E11-11, 1994, -, at 7:30 P.M. at Tigard Civic Center, Town Hail Room, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. Further information may be obtained from the Community � Development Director or City Recorder at the same location or by calling 639- { _' 4171 You are .;.nvited to submit written testimony in advance of the public hearing; written and oral testimony will be considered at the hearing. The + xY` public hearing will be conducted in accordance with the applicable Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal Code and any rules of, procedure adopted by the Council 4 and available at City Hall. ; COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT_CPA 93-0004/ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 93-0003 - T TRANSPORTATION PLANNING RULE AMENDMENT A continuation of review of a staff , ;4- , initiated amendment package intended to address State of Oregon mandates and a +' . other development standards related to transportation facilities. Proposed amendments are numerous and therefore will not be listed in detail. ': Comprehensive Plan Volume I (Transportation Inventory Report) is proposed to be ` "• amended to allow a greater variety of improvement standards for local streets. ' ` +M1" Amendments are also proposed to the following Community Development Code -'' Chapters: Chapter 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions) ; Chapter .? 18.106 (Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements); Chapter 18.108 (Access, . a Egress, and Circulation) ; Chapter 18.120 (Site Development Review) ; and Chapter 18.164 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards.) . a bon, , check the proposal description against this ad. z , ,, )'v, o r is 6�C W A f TT PUBLISH ,•,'. 41 1. , ._ -".:,..„.•.t.:'...,,' ' . r -4 d'.y+ .y• `.T v a - i. FRIENDS OF OREGON i 1 `T January 27, 1994 o • Carol Landsman s r' City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 , #, Dear M dsman; I am writing to ensure 1000 Friends has an opportunity to receive notice of a; hearings and copies of proposed ordinances with respect to your complia�ace with the ; Transportation Planning Rule, OAR 660-12-000 through 660-12-070, and specifically with respect to sections of the rule identified in OAR 660-12-055(3). Under . . OAR 660-12-055(3), cities and counties in the Portland metropolitan area are required. '' to adopt land use and subdivision ordinances, or amendments to the same, consistent } with 660-12-045(3), (4)(a)-(e) and (5)(d). These latter portions of the rule set standards ro for bicycle and pedestrian modes of transportation, as well as standards with respect to public transit. As you are aware, the deadline for compliance with OAR 660-12-055(3) t. is May 8, 1994. , I request you send notice of all hearings with regard to OAR 660-12-055(3), t t :'. together with any proposed ordinances, at least 21 days in advance of the scheduled ,4" •a hearing. ?} I am specifically interested in ensuring your compliance with „ .;.. OAR 660-12-045(4)(C), which requires new retail, office and institutional buildings at or s ; near existing or planned transit stops to provide preferential access to transit by locating La" .as close as possible to transit stops. In this regard, a letter is attached, dated May 11, 1993, from Richard P. Benner, Director of DLCD, to Bob Stacey, then Planning • a Director for the City of Portland. In this letter,DLCD explained how the language "as ':' ` Close as Possible" in OAR 660-12-045(4)(C) is to be interpreted. I hope you will take , • € this interpretation into consideration as you formulate your proposed ordinance under t OAR. 660-12-055(3). - Also enclosed is a copy of our recent report entitled ' he Pedestrian 4 Environment" `This report demonstrates the tangible benefits of providing the public ' with a quality pedestrian environment. Using household survey data collected by Metro ° and rigorous statistical methodologies, the report's authors establish strong correlations between pedestrian-friendly environments and reduced reliance on the automobile. Ai 1 y + 534 SW Third Avenue,Suite 300,Portland,Oregon 97204-2597 Phone: (503)497-1000 Fax: (503)223-0073 E-Mail:inmail@friends.rain.com • 4 ti S fi, y 2 c t• January 27, 1994 • ...._ Page 2 1,,,,.:::,::-:':':., of the edestriara envixonnaent' ;"Specifically,the report shows that improving the y uu ld by as mush as 10%: This ''` ; could reduce vehicle miles traveled.(VMT) p artic�larl s ' cant for compliance with other sections of the rule that reqi r a p Y er ca ita over 1995 levels`by 2025. Compliance with require a 20% reduction in p P this latter requirement is mandated by May 199 for the region as whole and ll�ay 1996 for local governments in the region. I offer this report as a way to urge your ,^r junsdictiofl to adopt plan and code.amendments that are progressive and that will not .i:::,,::;., uali pedestrian environment. Taking such measuges this spring .� � en,�ur� a high q tY P only assure compliance with OAR 660-12-0550), eput y gists tha�will n K on the path of coming into compliance with the VVi II' come into effect in 1995 and 1996. t ry Please include this letter,.with its attachments, in the record for the draft ,,, j ordinance your jurisdiction is, or will be, developing t® meet the mandates of j '"{ ; OAR 660-12-055(3'. In addition to the notices acid ordinance drafts requested above, please send me notice of any official action your jurisdiction takes with respect to ' compliance with OAR 660-12-0550). Please send all information`to me at the address ',;''''.1-1,7"'„':':". listed. Thank you. `, If you have any questions, or need additional information, please let me know. a , Sincerely, , • >` Keith A.Bartholomew Staff Attorney Y enclosures (2) : [ ` !e/ t y A. C. 1 ,:.:.....1::,.. , : 1 p' t Y P ' � / L l i i r ! •° 'F . , 2 4 ,.+ v _ k.. ,' } .fi ` WI '..� r is 't MLr 11, I993 DzP4RTI�C'N. O. ;{ • LAND Robert E. Stacey,Jr. CONSERVATION ;. Planning Director �' 9} Bureau of Planning _�' �; (3iy of Portland DEVELOPIvENT . 1120 SW Fifth Avenue,Room 1002 '`' Portland. OR 9720-1'966 1`3 Des Bob: x• This letter responds to your qu�ons about app ion of certain pats of the Tr�spo tarpon t -4 4 Planting Rule. .. In general,where a term in the rule is not defined local govcrzsinents have discretion to further define or refine now that tens is to be used,so long as the definition is reasonable. The use of ; less err 1e,.` e to s in the rule is,in pen,interim to allow local gove to use me,h best iudgment in responding to differing local needs and-eirctnzgstanccs. Given this general seeing, let me outline flow the.sp ci Ic ter S you've asked about should be intemretc ., k t w} Transit Stop r.Bus Stop { Transit stop is a more generic term which ene,orm asses all fomis of masa stops including park andnac ssza ohs,r-onsfec stanous,bus sus and ug.rai!stations, 2ndposs oly otn: fa hies ware uiasit veru. s DiCktio or clop of pass..ngess• A.bus stop is a type o. resit stoc. Bus sops are usually provia�eci along public stets andreo re some sue:.ia?considaao_s winch ,'.....5r-•W. may be dal:rent from other types or bens t stops. - 4a ,c fiwzred Trcnzsit Sere . Planned nansiz service includes ar least those streets or routes desi naxed_for transir service in the local co �:�s*VC DL.ar L n .t routes ''plP11 ed" by a local Hausa agency v.'olilC lso'tom ' ', {'` included if that Dlan is iz?some way fern ized or acc rusted by Lyle affected local goveml.m:m_ :•,, re •. Loceina B ngs"as Close as Possible"to Transit Stops e. $' ea Section-045(4)(b)(B)recuires that certain types of bu ldings be located as close as vossiale to Cant stops. A pardnula:distance was not SDrzified bee rise a number of factors zffer how °� closely a ttr I iln_g can be trlace.e.4 to a i ansit stop. The"as close as pos.sidle„standard is irncndee. : '1 co to allow for adwurtc sidewalks,aL ol:Jinoaa. on o clear Vision areas ax nr.7s. a icons, anti Oh'er i �, ill physical coi.w ai to a oa nicula sites. Such factors vr'from Site to site anc make .� establishment of a.spe:.ific m idi.al smnclard in a.statewide rule inapp oc izre. Fo: clarity ane°'se o1 adrai i.-t<`nou +he cs' toy azsh to set some spec ne cistane., Fsa�a Y. which c^-,:1d be vane ism site to site de ding on physical l::r ou`encounter- such as toe not-^.4_above. ?be objective in-e45(4)('o)is to site bthid.iass to 7.ov/de ,s , '`cre_T.°=en.A91 2.CctSc„TO i7''r I mere s a Crr�oice oerween two Ccsi s and one +t. ,',4••.,4' vaov neS b`er;"'L. S.ro=vcnic..es and tee o.iie _zrol des.oe to a^cress for ZDS'i it 14 Y. L's."s, ..:7' �i:C°siC'" wr..cr favors tran.siz users oirlC be.ap3:o szit. ,y /.lam!Co:;5t` tee T' S2! .OR c72 -45:C i • , .. if+. -s?.?',.. ar t t , i {rf } J.a r %., J _ 4 - +i•4 • . ,. r i . . . . _,. .. . -,-: ...,:,:,' 'MGy 1' 1993 Page ,, F Bz i1 an„gs '' aar"Evssting orPkrzned 7rcnsi Stops Sion-043(4)(b)applies to new r+ Baal,osier and mso.mttornal development which i.s ne.e.r t -` a isun�orplanned transit stops. This�uirernentis intended to affect t siting of buildings s which ', ale within a t sortable wig dote of a tt�nsit snap so that they are conveniently at sssIb e , ,� to transit usees. Consequently.we in t near"to include sites which are within a.reasonable `- . i ,. walllong dunce of a unsit stop. Most research shows t�a reasonable wanting distant a is one-quart=of a m ile for=sit stops and up to one-half:mile for light rail stops_ a Fa s Frovad2rg Access "within from"Centrist Developnaertts to 1Vearbj Areas '' -045(3)(b)requires that convenienr bike and pedestrian access be provided between certain .4 n hboxizood oesnna cons. A numlxa of c ominun ucs have asked whether or not this rcciats < that orrsitminvirovernents be made as a candid=of dcvclopr cnt approval. While sr�qurtg 'i needed offsite irrimovernents is the simplest way to ful5Il this r quir it,it would be possible to satisfy this requirement in ormer ways. 7 •' '` At a inimfm� the ordinance would need to require the iaenti�anon of needed offsite ,..s,....„., ... inuuixovemcnts, such as en acccssway ar a sidewalk on adjac nt propeily, and include some 'F m nanisirt to asstwe ma.the needed d s orovem are consuue We would recommend a i r combmanon of etevelopment controls ou.neighh ngw ; so that the iderufie`. `. d L venents are notprecinoe )anti a provision for funding and consniicr ng the zatovrme�r< • - : The problem of coordinau eg ofsitc irr.•.nrovements to provide an adequam netwon:of office�d `- --: pe•c •mart facuir es is not smple or easy,csp°., ally in p_rdahy revel ..d areas. Nonetneiess, { '-`'... ' we virtually the same issues in pl?raring and constrm�g local road networts. 4, Consc uently,the city may wish to consmer adapting its tc:.nniq.nes and pratces for planning' 4. and providing local roat1 irriorov enrs to oil;phi pedestrian Akupiuvem_enEs. ' TM : I hope that you find this in.=°o•'ngnon useful as you wa±to refine the city's ortunances. Sincerely, , • , 1 W '4.1..'.1((:".." ..."5‘'1.'‘.'"'"*.4t ",...`''.. ' . Richard P.Benrie; Director RPB:n: •. in f<. 'Xr2.:>por tp 4 ;y • ,•;•••** S • u• -.J _s, j L F..} 1'�i + :) ( A �. L Fit H b '` \ ., 4x k ti 4 t.. < 1 3!'. 4 7". r 3 t'.• M inn the . Land Use OF OREGON Transportation 1:,-,V:...--.-`, ,' Air Quality ,z ' Connection r. '' ' '''.'' . The Pedestrian ; ....... : .,.....:,-,,,,,. .: �z i.,.... . ,......,:......:4,-,. . . ,, -+-.''-''':. Volume 4A o- fit' .. o .wit Prepared by ` �° Parsons Brill' cickerhotT Quade and Douglas,Inc• ` with Cambridge Systematics,Inc. and Calthorpe Associates December 1993 , is a. St a *tt i }a{b. 4a; t s I'0 • ...„ ..,f.'4' , z ^Y, i Q c 'v: T x1 j Additional funding provided by Surdna Foundation, Inc. The Joyce Foundation ARCO Foundations Lincoln Institute of Land Policy - National Endowment for the Arts , ".� Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon ,...,:as::-,,t+ Ivietro . Portland General Electric Company i a. <: Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Portland ■ oc • re Pacific Development, Inc. Key Bank of Oregon David Evans &Associates, Inc. • c Kurt Koehler ,. i The New-Land Foundation,Inc. ' y14 . .. Q 1993 1000 Friends of Oregon. Reprint by permission only. 4 3 • 1 f ail.1.i ,1_ 4 5 1 '. -..."--::::-,.',:*;',.;,!: - - ,..., . . : .- , . ,.,, , , , _ , , , , ,, , ,, ,,,, , , , , , , , ,,.... .,,, ltd ~;i ..,. ..,..- , -,. ; -...: . .,: .,. „ :. . , -, ,..• . ,,. . . ‘,. , . , , . ., ..;,....,:.....,,,, {. e • Contents r 3 troduion.. .. ........ ....... ......... . ....... ....... .. ....... 3, Suyrrnasy a„.... t Overview 15 ' : Characteristics of the Portlan d Dataset 17 , . Household Travel Relationships ' ... 1.7 Travel Mode Choice Relationships 17 , Vehicle Trip Generation Relationships k ,' ' modeling Household Vehicle Trip Choices . Vehicle Mines Traveled Model .�... . ........ .. 33 j ,.:, hide Trip Generation Model 34` '. Conclusions : 37 A.cknowledgments `., Appendix A Portland PEI; Scores Piy Zone PP `' Appendix B -Results of Regression Analysis Js r n � ' y The Pedestrian Environment Volume 4A „r,” i t k '•{ ` j `.. }i ¢ '.. i ir _a � i .., ;. t x,r71._ j .r s. - a. F ea , .}.�.' .0 ... x-e- F. st of Tables 4a + d Pedestrian Category ' ., 6 Table.1 Distribution of Zones by PEP Pedestrian Enviroaunent F or, 17 $* '''''''.::::''''''''':::.'4::;..:::::' '' Table 2 Tra�+e1 Mode Ch* ho�ces by ,;• Table 3 Travel Mode Choices by Pedestrian Zone Cate,gorl! , ; a Table 4 Travel Mode Choices by Zonal Household Density.. ,.. ........`.....+ ..).-;:‘•••••11!:.-:•''''':•-•• 23 Table 5 Travel Mode choices by Transit Level-0,fService to Empl®OEnent a i. 25 Table 6 Auto usage by Pedestrian Environment Faetor ,... s e - 31 � . N Table 7 Household T Model Predicted Impacts Table 8 Equivalent Variable Impacts on V1MT Per Household Person 32 !I''''''''''''''''.:11.::::.''''''...''''''':' 1 :::.'--,•::''''....:'1•::''''''''..:;.'.....--".''::*:-.-'.: 3�, Table 9 Household Vehicle Trip Model predicted Impacts { , 5' at' p f lij t < J /tit C', a d 'x ,+ The Pedestrian Environment: Volume 4A t i t r a # L F+ -T .i , ..,:4 k '',.{:,:l'''.':75.'.'`.4`,,,-.; • ,. •-. .. 6 ' 0 0 ,, z...i'f w i i + v�q� ''• ' List Figures Figre 1 u Portland Metropolitan Region... ........ Figure 2. Portland IvIetropolitel Region Transportation Analysis Zones ...e :.,..-_', .,1`..',.. Figure 3. Pedestrian Environmental Factors(PEF)Scores by Group a. Figure 4 Non-Auto Modal Shares by Pedestrian Environment Factor(PEF) 21 a igurc 5 Non AtaioModal Shares by Pedestrian Zone Category... a x . ' - ifie d '''• t .-i Figure b. Non-Auto Modal Share)by Zonal4]HousehoDensiy a \ ` Figure 7. Non-Auto Modal S:'iares by Transit Level-of-Sera-ice to Employment...... .......:......... Miles' Traveled by Pedestrian Environment ;, Figure�. Household Vehicle lvlii ::26 Factor(PEF)F).. .., Figure 9 Household Vehicle Trips Generated by Pedestrian"Environment 27 Factor(PEF) ...... . ......... -,..... , > . 7,. +• ' �� � Figure 10. Impact of Land Use`raribies on Household Vehicles Ides of Travel" : 32 • x (�) ... Pik sf r e,. • f ,; The Pedestrian Environment: Volume 4A S i - n ; t •S 7 �� 1 a y ° -Y 1 s - • •• -- ,,..-........, ,--,....,••••••''— .1;..°:',:.•`-''.'•-..."-:...'.,..)-',..".•••.'",4-,'''',....,•••-'-''-•-:',":-';',.:.r.,-,".•-i•-..,;-.,".•-.••';'-':-.'°-.-'•••-'.;:'-''',°:°'•.,-;-...-.,.'...--I"',..-;:,':',....-:;,"4-.'-'-•-••••• •• - ,..,..... .-.....,....."...., ...,..... ' ::. IB-lkil 1TY STRIP ,,-,;c1......:,. ...-. ,,, --f,....---7,. .,-,....,.,...,:-...,,,,,., - --- -,..-.....',..:•;t::'!,.:-,f..;.:. LEG....... 1'...-.'";.-.'-'-"'- - • . - . .....•1.:-:-..",:'-'--.. ,... ....., ,--f....,.. , . , -. ....; . , . ..-. . ._.... , _. .... t, .......-..- '...,i.,-,.:.- . . ., ''''.* - ' -"" )—**.-t, i li■-• , ' A '-------- ..-.-- - ,:. ,,,,......:::(;...;.'i.i>,....,:,,..-...:*,... ..-:,,,3'.:::: ...., -,.-.!f ..,. V."..:::;•..',•v•--,•.',":,iti:..t. ;:.---- _ — .• , -i..-... ,,..-=.:4'1-.;.,-.-- r....e-',,:.°.. i*,'[.:.,=-...' ':-.'1,..',:.:-2,:••:.:,,, •:-i=..:':',.:0'-: ."...:-.i.-.,.. ' ' '...•:'.?44'; '","::,...''''.'it'-':'.t.,,,.-1•-...:::'(..;',.7.,11.1f-, --,;-'-,;•::.- ;;I::-- ..,'..e.,"-'•t.-1-..-',.',;',-,--.:.' ?:--3-1•;.1:,-"'.,...,-...'-,'`,.-Z7,,?'-i',-;:, -.',•••-;';1,1'...ri,;.1':'.1 ' .. :-'.;.!,.,.-: .- i-',...°.-.---.,, -.....-,:-.,,,!:.:„..--...:..---,,,, :...,,,-..-.-:.,,1-,-;'-'.,.-,,-,‘...,,..---,-.'....,-,:. -...‘!...,..i.k•••:*•. ''• --..:,!..•...,.,!,:;•-2,-'-.,:i.7.,•:..igk„'.,-,'...:,11..'-f.-4 r,-•:,,-.'''rk.-•••'-',,,-"Z.-:1.-''''-'-i-i,,;.','-'•?-;'•.,Z;■,".;:•-,..;•••;--. - 0 ...,;- .-..:"..f...1,:-:-.."...--:.,4"....P...5.41-' ,--17.;.:4"..:i-'`-:,,-.t!"..•:•.".•••'''''......7.•-:-•'''''.;.-!':,''':',...f.'•-..: '. - • "1 44 ;-:;':.-".".1:1.:,;:,;`:•;7.."-:,-.7'.•-:-;1.-:::.!.'''..;,•-•.;:i7...‘.1,-, :.:'-`:-.!..,',•• -.' , , - : . - ..:. ;::'•-•::: ..-'-'.,:i.,-,,,..---:,:,: `,,,...'::'..-7:,;:.':i..'::4i."::1:1"."?.;1. ';',7•••;'!i''....`.:!,•::-:::.-...*- --;:'...*;;;..,... ::','...:,2:;',';',;.:,*!,..":...:••'''-'' ' ' ,- ' '-'•i',•:„',. '...;,.-.;'_-i:,.;.-.".',."-,i.,it-,',.-„,:i:t.\-,r,.•iti,•.-.?. ':- ..,;i:":-.,..-2;-7....,,....,,',:,.:".,:'::,-. ,..,••;-:.;.,:-„t....-1',,n;!-:-"er':.,,-.. • '' - „:. :A,,.•: '-'2-•a,;-''-•"--:. 't-•-•.':':-•••,---..'';',t---A1(.•••'• '-'. '''..-'.;.'-1:,-':-.-;"-''''', '-'.'..'-',.*-.?:,,`'-'-:::•-•';'•- .:7-'::, --- ' .-,,I... 't'-'t.:.,•!..-.::-I''...:'''-7:',:.--"...3..--i, ---, .-...=p-,..-• ,..,'.'.........—-,., ' * ...,. .i.,: . ,..,,,$:::.!....;•::..,;',I117.. • ..- `,.,..1.,:...,... , ,. ,='-...,,,i..... ..,;;.......; ...,...,,:,....:,;;;i1..g.:.,,,,...-.:::::;..,...:...,T..L.:::;....='-.,:-..- ': ' .,.. . . - ' . ,-.-;.'n-:-1,•',"..0,:-;',5''.;f;.:i.':;-,..,..'--.1i-)4„,r',;,.'.'.4r-;:,i,1::.:n•-',:-.,,,',,;0.,-:..;-';:'-°',;',;''-‘:"';•i.,-.,,.„-7.!.'•]--,'''-',,i'-:-':n-•.;.-,n-.,.".•,',._,.,•,,:-,.F.-t,--,--n,.,1!''.'.-'.-n,.k'°,..-,'..,';::i.''-,.;":..:'':'-;'.-,:`",‘.';:....'..'''.'"4'_,',.•‘.-,0;.4:-:,;-.-'!'..n:;:',,-:'-;;'nng,;'t,;-':...i 1''".'..'-":°..:*,--f':•0..:4.•6;•,.i"-..-1,.,.:../n,,::n-'.:-.!-.:4°-:0;"--°1'.•'1..:.--.;,•:,-.f;?,1f;,t.:f.:,,1._.;-.t-'.,,'',4'..T,-°,:•,.-..., i;,,.:-;','•,,?,t;."';,I-,°•-•,4..1-n;:.--7%.'.?:I.':,,.,.,7.-*::4;.4!...:,:-:':,-7,..t...;'."';‘r",,'•.,•1Y--.,;i.'...:.,.,,f t''...-.:-::.•5 „ "1f •,-'•c 9,"''•-,.•.:---',:-i!.1.-..;1..::--."'.4.,°7'-.':;..:.,..„-'.:.;--.,',T..,.?.'-,,-tk;!._:;,,,.'-.:,\:-:,,.,l'.',.'i-.,.:"J"..'t': -'*,.;..-.-1;-;::•..,.".:''.,.",.",.n.,,;*:.,.,...;..?j"3:;.1.,•..-.t..-..°.".'',,--,,,`:..;,.'.•i*3•'...,,,'..:.4`,-.-''J-;.-•„,','',,,,,:'':;...%t::-.I,.-,;..t•.■':•..:;:.-.-:'';,-.-„,•%'.-;.,;.'.;,i-.'-6 - : : ( . '.-,-;:,--,'.-.!-e:-.°-.",,,'4..,.,,'-.°.-.•..;:.:..,,%:7.';.:..,.''-:.':,.,.',-.:,,,*'.?':;:.:.'---.7,i..•-.-,'.-...'.,3;i4;.:.:,•",.-;.-.5,..;%.--';.'4‘,'.T•".°"4'-:•°-,,;'-'-°',"-'"!,.•°',.,;i0i''°°1,-.;:-.;.,,.n■.;.n•-"':::,,.-','“-,"';,'n,-4.:;,.,:-''..,,'.i...'.,:s;'';/.1.--',:.rAt..'.;,'.':°-,!0':•-'.•‘':'7;•:";.-:i-,,..,.,t.L,.''-.i,','',i•..;-M'-,'....;,.'t;,-_..-;):.':',.'"'.‘'.‘",.'”,,.:P',1..,n.:.'';—,.'':.:'1....:*',.1,':,':,:1:2:..10',,;::,.?:''-:,-::.'!.':'t:.i.''f-:,:':i:-n.4-:;..".:,,:-'i--.!'°;.:,.:,.', n-.'-.'-•- '.' 0 ço.4 0 . , • ,•' !i, ' . .:. t , . " .01 0' . 0 0 - 0 - . 7 ; ' ' , - , ,..- -'; .''•, I. --' ' ' 1,-;,-7-',-4.'.`.,-','-:.-',s--" 1:°,-,7;-'''.','-',-,:: fi'-.1-,„;!--;.-:-:'-,-:: "-- ' . -, , , -,-„, - ' ' , „ - -.. • ,,,,,..„ ., „, ,,,,,... „... _, ....., , , .-,';';:-f- -- -', _ ' -' _."--,;',.'-`,- --„,;•'''''..°: -7.-,-:—,".,1 ley.,...;: ',.;ft",',".f....?'•.'„,•-; ,:-.--;-•= ....- ;.,." .-- - - • ' _ , •, - --'. , ;...........,-,-;.:•--... :::.;:":"..;••-.'.':.•$`-':':''''.7:41•`"`"*.f:'-'-,:'":i'!--c.:1'-'-••,,fj--.."-'..--.-•--?•-i•-•:."1:-".'-:''...: 1"-''' ,. • I ;-• ' ' ,' ' ' ..- -.--.,...-.-.-4-':'. :-.i...-2----..-:.;::.-,-'''':.;' `-'''. ''.••-• '"......k..;.;', ..'''-f-'[.:"'[.:::',1-.'-‘;',""::..:-:-.j..--•`'.`.:-,,."_•,;,:",'",';',-:••••:-.„,,.,:::,-.'!-,"--,-,..,.-,'.--,,:,.%.:-'.-,. - ' - . „...„,. • ._,,.,..,.,,:,-,,--,;:-.-,,,,,..,...;':'...-..."-- :-..7'-•;':,'.,'", .--,'...-,:•:.--••••••••.. ...-':: -' ' - .''' .'t.`",.... -,.?-•.",lfc--,!;',',,,"..:i•j°,...1'.'.-:•,•`-;',,,,:''''--:•,';',--.: •,;:•,-:-.'"....-.,..-- -, --• -:-, '. . ... ........,,,.....,...„.,...;:,,:•-.•;,;.,.•:.-2.'•'..',...-,i.,-;;;:;-,•,!....'•.•':•,':. ••••••:.‘"."-• '' ''''''''::'!';' L;P.'•--.:.'.: '''''''''''re•i''--''''.'...',-..,:''''-''"-i'., -''.i.-.:'-' ',- -''I - - ' - ..- ,-,.-.,.,,•:.-;!-.,, ,, ::---;','`.,, , -',''''' •:'; :•t.::'-',,:."-".":-,':';'--:-:-.,.--".:--.1,-'''''''----''--- ""...-...,„,...---,........y,;-='," ,1. .''...'•-'" :- -- • o�ios-g�-r ray0�- 'i t ��; n Introduction ' "Making the Land Use, .Transportation,; Aar-Quality Connection AQY'is a national ; • demonstration project to develop methodologies for creating alternative luburban land use ' ,y ; patterns and design standards and evaluating their impacts on: automobile dependency,. .:� .. ,i • mobility, air quality, energy consumption, and ,. . a sense of community. s K. Using the proposed Western Bypass freeway around the Portland, Oregon metropolitan • ` ± region as a case study, LT.ITRAQ has(1) identified alternative land use development patterns that reduce travel demand and increase the use of alternative travel modes; and (2) developed ..• -a; r reliable transportation modeling procedures that forecast the travel.behavior associated with these alternative land use patterns. 'r.,,.. I,■ The LUTRAQ'project contains six primary tasks: ,___;,.. t ; Task A. Analyze Current Model Limitations .4 a;. In Task A, the project team (I) identified the international state-of-the-art of } integrated land use/transportation modeling; (2) determined current modeling ; tit ... practices in U.S. metropolitan areas; and (3) evaluated the modeling system in place for the LUTRAQ study area ,i Task B. Analyze the Base Case .1'44, ... The project team established current land use and transportation opportunities and constraints in the study area. Task C. Develop the LUTRAQ Alternative Package ' The project team is currently establishing two alternatives to freeway construction, !' each containing three primary elements: (I)alterations in area land uses, densities, •'; and development design standards, (2) expansions in transit facilities and services, and selected existing collector/arterial systems, and (3) changes in land use and _ non-land use policies, including those related to transportation demand m - management. 1, OM ,� Task D. Modify the Models • The team has improved the modeling system in the study area to assure accurate ` measurement of the alternatives developed in Task C. { e , The Pedestrian Environment: Volume AA 1 4 A S i,` Introduetion '' Task E Test the Alternatives a 's'-'''''' l''','..1::' Using the modeling improvements from Task D,the team is�'analyzing a no-action j ` alternative, the freeway alternative, and the 1,11 RAQ alternative (developed in .`' " Task C) for their effects on congestion, land use, air quality, energy,corptioar, quality of life,public finances,and user costs.' _ . Task F. Implement the LIJTRAQ Alternative Package The team will prepare a set of recommended actions to implement the elements of'' '`a , the alternative developed in Task C. T Work products from the LUTRAQ project include a separate volume devoted to each task, " ` plus a final report and technical appendix. ; x,. Volume Title _Authors •ti, � • I Modeling Practices Cambridge Systematics,Inc. and . Hague Consulting Group 2 Existing Conditions Cambridge Systematics,Inc. and .` Calthorpe Associates 44 `' 3 Description of Alternatives Cambridge Systematics, Inc., . Calthorpe Associates and '1' µ Parsons Brinckerhoff 3A Market Research Market Perspectives and Hebert/Smolkin Associates,Inc. 4 Model Modifications Cambridge Systematics,Inc., " �, `, S. I.Putman and Associates and , Parsons Bnnckerhoff' Interim Report Cambridge Systematics,Inc., { Calthorpe Associates and I ,, Parsons Brinkerhoff 4A The Pedestrian Environment Parsons Bnnckerhoff 5 Analysis Hof Alternatives Cambridge Systematics,Inc., t` Caithorpe Associates and Parsons Brinckerhoff -, 6 Implementation Cambridge Systematics,Inc., t.. '� Calthorpe Associates and --� Parsons.Brinckerhoff as ®o 7 Final Report Cambridge Systematics,Inc., Calthorpe Associates and Parsons Brinckerhoff 8 Technical Appendix Cambridge Systematics,°Inc., Caithorpe Associates and 4' Parsons Brinckerhoff J s , ° '' ? The Pedestrian,Environment. Volume 4A 4i — vii. ''',,'"7"'.'-e,' Y ;tv . X +., .,y 3,,4"-+^ k �714' �± . , i';. . ,1 2 '.,y4• 4 '1 *� • 4 : Li7Py +AYS tit: 10 , - ,r. . ,. This report analyzes the connection between land, atter pnd�household travel b or in the Portland . Data from the 1985 home'intery ew.surrey conducted byMetro.(the a Portland area regional government) as well asresaalts fr ii thc'i e oral'travel forecasting `-' f r� j�1• . :• models and land use information were used to.) °theiiypothesis,.that4travel=behavior is affected by neighborhood land use patterns. Spell,attentLon,was given to the quality of the ' pedestrian environment as gauged by the Pedestrian nvironment Factor•(PEP),a composite;, -1,,,:::.::,, :a'.; measure of"pedestrian friendliness" • The first part of this report examines and quantifies the relationships between household travel 2 • mode choices and the following variables- quality of thhe,pedestrian environment,residential ' 1�. density,transit level-of-service, and proximity to employment activity. I'n additian,avar Lions t in the quantity and length of vehicle trips were exanuned. The results of this exercise confirm the direct correlation between the use of pedestrian s and transit travel modes and the land use : variables identified above. As expected, residents in neighborhoods with higher density, p roximi ty to employment,yneflt, grid pattern streets, sidewalk continuity, and ease, of strut -� • ,=, crossings tend to make more pedestrian and transit trips, whereas residents of more distant, -: . lower density suburban areas with auto-oriented land use patterns show extensive reliance on the auto, a , In the second part of this report, multiple regression techniques are employed to confirm statistically the hypothesis t'nat these land use variables do in fact impact household made • { ' choice decisions. Regression models were developed to explain both daily household vehicle x miles traveled (VMT) and vehicle trips generated. Although constraints in the level of detail ' .0 and variability in the available data limit the overall explanatory power of these models, the ,• " , land use related variables,including the PEF, are shown to significantly impact both household .. a, a �� . VMT and the number of vehicle trips. i # Specifically, the models suggest that a 10%reduction in VMT can be achieved with a region J: := wide increase in the quality of the pedestrian environment to a level comparable to that ', ": currently available on Portland's most pedestrian-oriented zones today►. These zones form a larger contiguous area with densities supportive of transit, land use mixes which reduce auto u° use, and an orientation to the needs of pedestrians, as more fully described in this report. These findings are consistent with results of simulations conducted for the LYJT1tAQ project, g described in "The L. J RAQ Alter native/Analysis of Alternatives: An Interim Report" (October 1992). h Y ; .. t The Pedestrian Environment; Volume 4.4 3 !:,=stir. Yt r r .,, > -......::''';':.?.:i',...:::',1:',. LEGIBILITY STRIP • ■ • _ Ia 4 :::,.*.•,,...P...'.• t.! ';.P.,7,..:". :• d F S A y i �x,lam .**"."'�'"tV--* LTr _ s } =affil - i } i ,sue} f:$1:*;-, t;.$:.':. iltiOt'..,"" ' -.' '''''.4•'"-t' .• fe; f A 'tit t .‘.‘-'t1.. l' r ha i R gt 9}[ M t•c.' tr 4p 1!i� l t 7 L 'l s: • ! n .,f Isn.i ! la a l.,Y r 5 ` t ;.,:,54,-,., . .i i , s 1}l,5f,..; i ¢y"Yr s',s..- ' j,.° , " - . , - ! i-•ry,. 1.117yi ti l }'. T t i My� y�f •�,,............ .. ...., ,. .. .B , , „ , .. . _. T a� ...... , ,. ,...,.. . .. ..„,.... ... ... ...:,-„_., _ . ,, , _. .....:._ . . . .A.. ._ * , - .. _, , . _ ,, _ , _, _ , , ... ,,, ., ... ,. ...._. ..,. . • . 4 . y4 ` A { e g Overview fM; . This volume is a: supplement to Volume 4 of the LUTRAQ Project, issued in November,et_ 1992. In that report the authors describe several travel model enhancements made to the l forecasting system used by Metro in Portland, Oregon."=Of greatest relevance here is a "s description of a tiew variable, called the "Pedestrian.Environmental Factor" (PEP). This ;-; ,a,,; measure is a composite of four different attributes of the natural and built environment,which Y' were shown to improve the accuracy of several submodels in the Portland system. In x particular,the pie-mode choice model (walla/bike vs. motorized modes) was enhanced by the introduction of the PEF measure into the set of equations on which the model was calibrated. As developed by the Metro staff in consultation with the LU .RAQ Consultant Team the PEF consists of an assessment of each of 400 zones in the regional travel demand forecasting model network for each of the four following parameters: ,e. Ease of street crossings Sidewalk continuity ' ' ,'• ,k o Local street characteristics(grid vs. cul de sac) • Topography et ' F To estimate ewe of street crossings at the zonal level, staff identified key intersections and evaluated their width, extent of signalization and traffic volumes. For a measure of sidewalk 4t,i a, continuity, staff judged the extensiveness of sidewalks on principal arterials served or likely to •{ -' be served in the future by transit. Secondary attention was paid to the extent of sidewalks on ' neighborhood collector streets. As a measure of connectivity of street systems, staff estimated ` ' { the extent of grid street patterns in each zone. They also examined the fineness of the grid ' (distance between intersections). As a measure of topography, staff evaluated the ' extensiveness of sloping terrain and the steepness of these slopes. '' ;r ' Each zone in the model system was scored on a three point scale for each of the four i ea characteristics named above. A composite score(four-12)was created for each zone, with 12 It ee being the highest possible and four the lowest. Four different staff completed this exercise , Cl) independently and then compared results in order to enhance the objectivity of the analysis. '= L . Some zonal scores were modified on specific parameters to reflect a consensus reached on -+ their characteristics. This simplified Delphi approach resulted in consensus on rankings for the entire network of zones. ' `� Table 1 summarizes the distribution of pedestrian environmental factor scores. Figure 2 ` • shows the location of the 400 traffic analysis zones used in the analysis and Figure 3 • summarizes the distribution of the PEF scores associated with each of them. 7:, The Pedestrian Environment: Volume 4A 5 • 1 ,- y • , x j.%. Overview :..., •` ' Table I. •': Distribution of Zones by PEF and Pedestrian Category .X i{„ PEDESTRIAN , •t NUMBER.. •• R r ENVIRONMENT, r ZONES 5 ,, 7 40 30 } ' 9 y 26 -Y+ c; 10 20 Li "' "1t 37 x 12 21 t Total 400 ,. • 16 cf the 400 Transportation Analysis Zone are considered external to the Portland AAetrepartin Area "s is 1 The PEP was determined to be a statistically significant variable in the equations of the model into which it was introduced. Specifically,••the use of the PEP improved the ' ,- •;,,,..,. model's ability to explain variation in auto ownership, mode choice and destination choice. :- This supplement to the Volume 4 report is designed to explain the importance of i 1 neighborhood-level land use characteristics, particularly PEF, on travel behavior in more .....� understandable terms { ,k ; ' A number of studies have demonstrated the relationship between residential densities and iy mode choice, beginning most significantly with Pushlarev and Zupan (1977) and followed by Smith (1984), Potter (1984), Newman and Kenworthy (1989) and others2. Today the significance of residential density in mode choice models is a fairly settled question. x ; '? Portland's travel demand forecasting models include several measures of density already. Several research projects in the last several years have suggested a relationship between • o° residential densities at the neighborhood or subregional scale and automobile use, 1 expressed in terms of vehicle miles Of travel per household3. The evidence for this W ' The reader is directed to the Volume 4 report for a more comprehensive presentation of the role of land use variables of , in the Metro regional forecasting model. The volume also presents an_independent'confi mation of the statistical 2 significance of these land use variables,using more complex methods than those described in this report. Pushkarev,B.,and J. Zupan, Public Transportation and Land Use Polka. Bloomington,India:a University Press (1977). •Smith,W.,"Mass Transit for High-Rise,High-Density Laving".Journal of Transportation Engineering. 110, 6(1984)pp. 521-35. Potter,S.,"Tire Transport Versus Land Use Dilenuna Transportation Research Record,,M. (1984)pp. 1-8. Newman,P.,and J. Kenworthy, "Gasoline Consumption and Cities:A Comparison of U.S. Cities 4 with a Global Survey. Journal of the American Planning Association. 55,1.(1989)pp: 24-37••,` f 3 Harvey, G., Relation of Residential Density to VMT Per 'resident: .Oakland. Metropolitan Transportation ,; r 9 Commission(1990). Holtzclaw,J., "Manhattanization versus Sprawl: How Density Impacts Auto Use Comparing .• 6 The Pedestrian Environment: Iva hone 4A ,;, 1 V ....•... .w - .»,. OPerwiew relationship, while clear, has been less than compelling because several social and economic measures which are known to explain automobile use, such as the number of workers per household, the rates of auto owfiaership, household income, household size and age of the household head, were not included in the-studies. In addition, very few studies have been published'to date on the role;of pedestrian•infrastructure in affecting mode • choice decisions. —""4*- -ti 4 _ a Thus,a principal objective of this report is to extend the current state of knowledge on the • relationship between land use characteristics at..the neighborhood or zonal level and measures of travel behavior, including mode choice and automobile use, by controlling for q effects of socioeconomic variables known to influence this behavior. While the first part ° of the report presents a series of descriptive statistics on these relationships, the regression 4: results presented in the end half of the report are designed to address more rigorously ' the question of the role of land use on trip length, vehicle trip generation rates and vehicle miles traveled. Before introducing the results of the analysis, it is appropriate to describe the context in „ which the analysis was conducted. The following pages contain three maps. The first (Figure 1) is a generalized map of the Portland metropolitan area, indicating basic landmarks,jurisdictions and the primary road network. Following this is a map(Figure 2) showing the 400 traffic analysis zone system used by Metro for travel demand modeling. or The map in Figure 3 shows the composite PEF rating for each of the 400 analysis zones. To further illustrate the components of the PEF rating system, a series of photographs are provided following the maps. The locations of the areas depicted in the photos are indicated on the Figure 1 map, Finally, a detailed description of the data set used-for the analysis is provided. fib ���pp • ::. f.; Five Bay Area Communities". Proceedings of the Eleventh Inten'sationat Pedestrian,.Conference. Boulder,Colorado, City of Boulder(1990)pp. 99-106. 4 Pushkarev,B., and J. Zupan,Urban Space for Pedestrians, Cambridge,MA,NT,Press(1975). Stringham,Mp "Travel Behavior Associated with Land Uses Adjacent to Rapid Transit Stations 1TE Journal,52,4(1982)pp. 18= 22. Unte:mann,Richard, "Adapting Neighborhoods for Walking and Bicycling". Accommodating the Pedestrian. Van Nostrant Reinhold(1984). ' i The Peaesmai Environment Volume 4A '' l a L - - Y ,,t ye - `LEGIBILITY STRIP y • r J r n `' t:' L. d 1- ) lif ,.., -,..u,,,,,1 .:iiiiMKRWrialawistirr . , x r a ='J \: island i� t ' .. �la V9 fig • L. y•Ni..\ Crk► \11 \I:7'4:ff MwY 'WY —. 47 1'T.i4Z�' �,w 4":1'�t t'tS :::100 t. " 1" �-- ?iy yr tC -. t ri ;l''4.,.•.al ;3* �f - r F 4 . EG 4 ` ;� =:i.�� /:V 11. .O'illepe �7:. ' . \ A �+. Oi �''' ' ' �. rW[a lrly 1� ,,,,b................. .„31a 2. M.. r �' e (tMr ..00 'n•y '`t M•- -.a EAYEpr4!! W 0 fl It) - 111. '/. 1 J] r ( L-t� ..�,e. - r t r.-fit �i iittiii.._, . g�. r ILA 4 i `1`1. .— I1[V®liciI0 Va116y •P 01 OEHRV a L ke. Le wAsiNNClgd co. : .' d> , .. f.ii�y ` Ity '} i :� o.. LEGEND . i t.....- of dal• ` Tusist i 2 ! 1 err c. Z. Purdend Metrapolltsn Aaglon °''P �` Waa "fb j•,, t --Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary. , ., - � Li n1► Y e 0,Numbers rater to photographs on • ' , r4 I 't5 - wrG im+��,e,,~ a pages 11-1®. ! :_. , . �� a I Figure 1 --- S tr aid„ t � step ,..., .,_,.4.;4;4:.,.„.....,.,;.,....,..,....,..4.4,,,,,,,.„.„.„ .1",.-.........'„......4;..,.!..-_,:,. .. ....7,-...:.•:-TV-?t:••••.%-4,'••.:.-'1.. -.....,..:,',. 44:,.:"::•••••:::";,..",.•,:, ;.;,..,-,•.,-.1=-1.;`,,:-,:,••-•:,;...,,,:'',..',:--......::'.:...-*.:... •vT.-.!,.. --...;_-'..,--.......!.:-,:.::::' ,--,', .-. -.;'•.,':-'--::-:-.?„;---.%.:••:.- ....•'.."...--...---i.-'....:.,..•. ,-,: .'•' :','..:--,'•:.--.-',.!:., ..,--,--.'•'.;,.,;:-....:,- •,!.:*-:,,-.i.:'•••',,.'-7-.'.,..'',,,.,-;?1!-?.•-,--':...-. ,.%'."-'•.-..; :..x.;";-....,......,:-`.'....'',.'.;-"_".. LEGIBILITY STRIP i.:,•, ,-,,,..,'L?:-,..-.•,;;;:,z,--.,.;.:.,,•;z:: ';'„'...•• ..:_i..;.„;::-..;•,.•;,,,..•,-.,,i.:,:-...,:{..„-4--Tj',.-:,..,......:::•::,:k!•:::•,,,,,,,4,...:•,.!,:,'.:',-.,,.•:,,..:,..,„..!-,..t.......,,,,..,,,,,,4.,,_.,. ..., „, . _ ,. : : • •:.,.:.. . • .-_,. ... , , ..::''..1 •::..:. . . :,...: • . . • :•_.:7, - 11111111/ • :. ..•,,•.,•:: :-.:k Z-• 1111111,g44 'Milo, , : ,,:. '''..,--"P•- . :7:2 • • •-•;:-. • 14. /41,,." 4,111 11610111,ig ...,:...,: ,t,. . . . . . . . . . , .. i,.:..„7,s,.,,,:filv, . • . \. ,.. .....,. ., . • . , , ,, ...4..... .... . ,.;...,...:, g 4.46....„,„„,,, .46,4,,,i,...■, . , ,..4444,-,, im--..c„„„1,,,,,, L01,..--,_..,,,„,,,___,_.-,),........„............_,...iN , ., .';t:.' "1" . . -0 itilk:NkF■4014414,.litilitillii."414kii _ . oftifilif‘41,1illitialeall , - -: is e ‘111PAL.411141141,A . iltilr3eolLtr••=.-"Illt 51 trab,, , ,,,,...„.......... Nt, . . .., -N....1W 1;tit!prnir4tjIVIik"r;..O.41IIII,/liijflltilgj .i "'',"K- .,. ‘ „yin , - -, , 30 •-\ *'L"i a ClillriA0491131atrill Z5 1116...14%!.....41111111P - ':L'. C7 • ' , -' . ''' .N Itf-.1! 1111111PIA - Ili '' . :',...T:...,. _ i... • it) ANS -1.-PII6's. ' _n ; ' 4 4...&_41111116.413.1._ P 1 . . 41:,41111;IIIT4VilltaPPalll=t10117011.14 _ . ,.. ... ,. . •,f.: ro . • i 161111n•■.i. • -"*".•"'•-.A.1`..•21t:11"4-4, 4.i.'4'.. 14'' l'-noskiallailifikliiik . .. '. • A,,,.....47---',*. 4141 """i'iii■vittt-f:',-ne-iiiillited10,94111...tdi! -...27.1,2t.-..--10-ir:L .-....-...1 - .-. . . . . ;.-,-..-.i.: ..... .. , illk. --41W144171Zeiratift'll■.,,i4.4.44., .7,..,,,wwgifiti3iritliriittaktitiriirill:firiiiiig,111011r .. ' iii .; - . _-.. x JIM .t, .111111"■1 . 4 . --, r___ipti. tizei.--4,..Viiiira,wiliiptrskutrataLtillEttl,:zzioail;_. .. ... m,t,:, iirilL-51(4 dirifJola flii■tc$1,`Kk ,It-..,..=,,i1 -mit.,:ii-41 ri:,tt..i.ty,Lip:ATeAviL,,tri. . ', . . . .. ..,. _ ' - ' - • • ellaii-....14t.gu-ia.liiit 014.wei6,115117.11011441,11,iiir WAIIIT '. : - , • - . ..\ - t. .. c,:.-.. , -- - . -- t■aPF "1411W11 bisi--41 ,':...::'':::: .•., -L- , - _ -14 ..iistpillirkippw . 1 --=.1% ra,, .. tile.,.8,Nali:440-7w - 11 . : • - '. . . . . . , 1 1r- - fOkiiii*gai,,41!ifv-÷g'-wk• 1-a- , - --- - - jilt • - .' - ,..,f., • • .06,...„.. ),,is, irA.,•,1\sit.,;),)T--• 0 ,.•..i..,..„,.. ...,:. ,. • • ..:t.opi; . • ' ./Aitelp, 4■11•-'*;;A• ',-3*4 : ...,4111104111011111 . ' •.• - -:,--;,:-}:--;-:--:::-.=.,.. ..:-.•...... ' . :-- -.-- - -:..--- . , . . .. i 1 - ,., -- •.----.-&-vot.,\ .44,i_ 1 4 till. -- - , iii!o:f# ‘Ytlipsy..V.1 s- - . -l'-'111._ -454,.."Sly ' • . _.•,...,„. ., •. . .. .•. . . . , . ,r ■ . . . • .... ,■ , .1.... •,. `,......•-, ... .. • -r • , ■ '. . • .111itillIE Of VI irk j•..i..mil . .' 1 • z,....:.;..,,,,,,...:T, ,T,.. ::, ' T ,,,'"'■,..,:,,, .,,,. L____,_____ _,_..._,___,....7EGEND „_...... -7--- . '%,.._dor._.,.,_k1411111P///1.4.61i*Iii( .' - ''' '4 1‘ 111114 . . - ......., . .. , , , . , . . portian,dr 1,44iropostuil..R.910,4; . . . 4 In .4c41: . xi • '.-...'.".-...,..,.-......i.._.,...i•:,.....:..,,:,....•,„.,L.:..c.;•,::'.•,:-:.,:-.„:7,:-,'1'.1.„..'......,•.:••,.:„;-...:-_....,..:-:.,:.-,:,..•.,„-.;........,.-:..,.:',,-.....-.T..:_---..„-.'-'..-_,-,.:-..._'.-'_'.. ..'...L.... ....: .... -.•... •,Tllr-,e ns;o.rt.a,tio..n.Ang..-.,in 25 400.-Zon6 Sys. .ts.mZ. o..)-n. a n- F!Our&2 -. „-i4 s s , - , , so . Pm7 iP l _ •. ,. . .....• .‘., . ._ ,?I . : I ' I . iligielinft ....„:„.:,..._,T,..„_,,„.„..-.....,:„.,_-.. ..„,_:.,,,,,,..,__...,;;:,,......._. _: ._.,._:.1.,...,.... ,,,2_,...„...._:. _ , . „ s.,.L ._,_. .. .,., , . . . ... .. ... ..,....,....,...,...,......., ..,....,,:„..,,,.. ,:„..,..;.:..:...,..;..,:.::::„.„,.../_.,......:.1.,;:....:.:_:,:.::::......:„.....1:_.... .r.,,_...,..:._;: ..-:,,..,.._, .___,...., ._: .:‘.. ._e_-..-,...:_. .=-:7.::...:...'•:-.1-: 1..- . ”•-.-. '. .-' -: .- - - . ---, ,,.........,-,-..--4,.:4.."'•,--'-1 -`•.; ',■•••,..:'...-.A. ..-..;'..,..'‘.......--i'.. -,f.:-,:s .';•;i..,:•:.:.'..:'''..;'.!,••-:;?..'"..z''''-1';'•.7..'-'-'•1;•'.':'s''''s:'''.:k' ' 'L' •'-.''' -- '- ,,,,„..,,::::-:,-.:7.•-:,-;-•-:..•-... .'7•'-';:i.-:--::'.`"• ••-.'''.•.-'...:-.'--.•-•••r•J,--'-..--,-'----':•.- -.1.,......-.1-.-..--,,.-....•.i.. -,.';:-.:,:r.,.'.:...;,-..z.;,..,..:;‘,.fr..••••-.7.,';'..- ..:;:',.•':t:'.•-_,•':;:...'2A.:_.=i‘,=•1!.--..;.:'1-,-,.;T..- :., _ - . .- ... ..-......-.................••. . i:,77f-.- ' - `..-;',:)."':;::'-:';',..**...;.-t: ,......f...,I.:'.;',.:-:.•,....,- : - ,:;,. ,.! .1-''.:t, 7-:' .:'-':' .:l'.' '." L. ' :. LEGIBILITY STRIP ._,..:.,..4...- tw:-:::;...,::::::j•.": '..,:,;.. -,,5...- .i..::-.).,..:..--k...::....::.'..1,:::---I-.-' ,.,-,;-'..' -— -•'. - i.. ,,...... :-.,-,.;,,,, -.-..-,..-,!:.•:.:.:!-..--..,-.7:;',:;:.,:i. ,... -.-,- •-•-•- --'---'•"'''' ' .. . -•-• . .:-..., — ■1111Wir IL/ MIL • • -. , . 10111116, r., .._ .1,-..::, .... \"? 04 : .= ... . . 1, s, ..,, .,--,.;• 'd . ,, \ .'"'''''11■■ 1, -.., - Aili 5 - ' 11W1161'W*--.1,-alimir . • - - ' .......,..„, .. ,. -.-,.- -..t.-...':\----,,.. ..,:..-.:...t.,.,...::::„..;,....„,:•:,,,--,7.,..r!...,71F,,,,mit---ra,.,,,,....,,„„..........io-s.,v, .-.41..,.01,,tlitt r'.. , .... s.,............,..„.....„.................,,....,,,..„,,,..„.„...,,,,....,t ....,3.....„,.,,,,......t .., .....,. _ ;.,:•,..,..,..:..„,.....::,....•;:„.„:„:„4.,A,.,,,2:1,..1.11: ...... 4 , • 1:%111: 1111111111 411k.': •4i';:::::••':':'!.'''.":1•.-:::'T4i: 4t3fi<44•4i 11..M 11111111..., ''''t• ........, ,,..,..,-;.:•,... • •,.. ..',.pc', , uwicir"ii-7‘11% .....,. . ,., ., . ... „...„....„ . . „,„„„,„. --r-rhanitgibiacipt-ajoiri., .. ... .... *a. ,.,-.,.:-..,..,1.-.-,..--...,..-.:•',.. :.,...,. -....,- ...•41-0-711/L . ';t:.:,.. - • . % eiNiri:/00;16- ii:-..rgellf•10:..41BikkAl„i..,,,,:\:iti, ..,-,!.!:::i..f,,:t..4...:..:',.:,;,,..,........:,;..,..,„.",:;..:,rvilk IF — , i •. ':,....• ,:..,.:.. : , , ,,, .,....: * . . , $, IlaikiPPJ.i:Ipaed'11•7:41k,... .ia‘nk.461.li -N . ,_,A, ,,, ,)„,,... .,t,,,, .. • :. .„.,,.. i„, ....„,....„..„- . , 1 'Mot. Alt111 ,-Ai;, 140.0..,,:-••0,iktti-,t,•••„...(',0itiriltifrAAP • - • .. - ' ,,, _,,_• ‘,. . ._..,,,.„t„.•,. ,. . ,..,,,,.... .. . „... , .,,,.......;;;...;- •i• , , . .. II. . 4011. .,./1?---<:-. '.;....„.;-..., 4: , ,..„ ,..t,%If thrill*,_____4 :.:::' iv ,.., r,, . .0 .,,,:•;••,.: •• • - ,.. . • . if, • . LW N:A . J . a *h%.--,0•0 _ . . . ... Az7:...."-A Ilk. • -to ...„ 7..._14 , , 31 1 , I ___ ..) . A . ,...... . %...,..,..:.1;.•: „ .1. -.,:. ..-. .. 0 ..Ertio.,0 . -:-1 .,-• --.• , . , PEE 74 priFti tz . . Pedestrian Environment FactlIr 1/1111111 ,ss i . . '': ' ' • .' ' (PEP)Scores by Group mB . - r .....„..... ,,,,-'f,g- •-:-.,-,-...,' . .• .-..--_oinure3 3 -et :, f , - ■:'''...:7.:(..'+',-.-..,-,:,,I, .1.k: .-,T,.:: ,- .. , . ..--:*;',.:-.1.-,'.',,',;,. .., - . - -,.- '• • -- - -.■„..t:;t:':',;,-:.",:;:, ','.1;,„'-i-,--, ' ,1.„`-:„.;",j. - '': - , ''" - , ti.....:•71:4?.'''':::',41:-3.*-'t^'/:::::',-',..;7:1-,!-.7„,',,,'-',"_*.,,,:r .":-'f::' , _, -• - ' . '. , .. .., • , .-... ,,,,,,;,-•';',7,.',,-,:,'.>..',;(:1'..'-'-'47,%..i-.:-'!..-;',''....'-':f..`''';',:•.:::-...e.7-,..4.i....--*;...'::,•'1.:::-.:.•••%::::-'''''....-".‘'.'...--'''''''.'' ''':' "...'',..721,:i4,i15,;::;.:::+4r,,%•';'''....::"...,,'-',";',.1-,„:,' ;:-?'::'_'''';':-•::*-, - , ' -" '. . . , . :,,,....,...... ..,;,-,-'..,;',,'f• .:.'-'.,.":, _ .::::-! ,.''.. ,•,:.,,: + .:'•..‘:'.....4'.!,1"•',",.,.• "•-•*•••-•' ' ' ' • '•- . .,:...-..-..,-.2,.-;.%':''.''''''..!':,,'!: ;:-Itt-;i:i-',.....,_4,'-'-.: .',:'•''•''-: ''''' ' . . , . < ■ . ... }. /q , Factor No. 1 { Ease of Street Crossing z• a i "Why did the chicken cross the road`" One of the key indicators of the quality of the pedestrian environment is the degree to which one may safely cross the street. In analyzing this factor, key intersections were evaluated for their width, extent of signalization and traffic volumes. ,. is Photo ®>Although sidewalks are present along this stretch of PV W 185th r Street in Hillsboro, . µ= v ` y '� -'= a"�i'n'*"'�kiw,Y 4 1 L�;'k 3 y ly � ?. F+'"' t 2r dl, the street received a �•1, ;t' "' _ ,, f rating of 1 (the lowest ' _' y .` "` '` l'. score)for ease of <.., « r �r r � �. .1 . r r`rTI T.1�s :,2-7‘.;,c,,,,'r a 4 ' street crossing 1 a,° :�.,; `,. .a--'`.-� =- i�.�, ,,t. because of the width `' .� "� w �, = ,a t of the street, the long 3. ,��_. , w .xi �; � _:: ° .:,,,;"::„.4k:, - r distances between , ti - . n t ` traffic signals,and k� r �` . ' --� = '�. °•1 the high level of , 0 '`-1 ,''�„ ;,,, traffic. ,, Y n , .. .:�..,..,_ --. . w.. c. I ' d -.".,?-'.',7, a " ''photo:Keith Bartholomew , • * a t, 4. 1 ';‘,':.4..'...,..:::, + :4.,.4.,:„14,,,,s.,:,:,4%,4.:,.....:, v �, c k E e aJ,+e $ Zl r A t',11,:',-.. 4: �_ 7Y w .; J 5 r 1 1 ' ' 1 t ' i1'AR.Bt, KS► CcFF , , h ; .q, rat.:„ s' y ¢.ter s..... e-`-"tt Photo Co:By 1 ; • h I . ;F=:1 x„ .,. _`-, 1:` contrast, this section �' 74' b r • a, „� sue. f,� ,~. T x'+#u ofrort anU,s�7. ; R r 5 s �. i + , at:'..,,,-.1.0.:::::,t;'1',` :rY �s y '''..:4'.'...4::-.f.:1_ �+ , Hawthorne ' L W.o • a Boulevard was given r " :ire':. l• ' i . k: s - '` ar w a rating of 3(the liv; ^; ,, l',:.* y ': - a•highest score)for . r E� r {q �,�‘ y street crossing t ;:f..::,..!!!.-;;;;,..4,,,,-....,..,' ' 'e�"r' �lr �" ,.I i -f ,. because the street is 1 �° - � �,�' � �} � relativelynarrowwith , #.. j t `" "'"""-R~ 4 7:-.,..-7,5,--,,,,.;:i,,:-.)-,....::,-.-'....:,,,-.;;%..mot .! c', .y . y7 C 1'1` ++ } ! w} ., 1.1 a• frequent signals. t jr A.-`l 1(t 2 h •� L 1 l+4 •t r a •photo:Anne•Weaver • ."�"{ tip_ a f r►x: 7 ' + + { + a51 .iw i i x } xr l + ¢ • t SJ ti f r ::-+'*:::..! y p J a i 1'-:�i 'F R ? xl ,.i y :, :Note:Figure 1,p-8 -,--4-..- , r . shows the geographic • r t, < * c '.4 - location of sites depicted 'f in photos 1-$ '' The Pedestrian Environment: Volume 4A 11 �.. ,_ L Y � • 1 � ,a x •, x ~f + tt • �r � - ,, + , l .d ._. I.4�, . ,' S y .t .,.. ' ., Auk • ' ..,,., ... .; ......--, • ; ::;... z°.:;:-:. 7. , . *4 , 6;• .., .■".......,'",:', • Mr d 4 .1. ■•••■ . * ..• .:.'•*4 WIliel•■••••. . - Overview _..„,. ,. Factor Nov 2: ..... ::.... . -- .,... ...„: .. ... ,....,,,-.,„, ;.:■• __. -....,_,-.•-•-.'''1 •—••:- Sidewalk ContinuitY - - .!.:,...,.. . 9 u .. '‘. ..", ',Trip * the light fantastic. a' .,... 1,,, ;...-..-- The most obvious factor in determiningthescideeawlityalokfntehtwe poerkdestrian environment is .., , -',-‘,.Iz.... the presence (or absence) of a continuous,.-„...,... -----\\ . . .,- ......,.. . ...... - , . ..,...,... .. . -‘ . - - ,. . h .--:.--. .. ..,, --.. Photo€ Although , \ .• -- , ... , , .. ., •1,•• . ..• -... .'..- there are sidewalks .., along some , - •.,- ---.:- . . ..- .. .. . -:.. •• ...• . --- .- ...,'. -...• properties . .r.L.•••,••; -,. -..--„ ?_•;,.':... •,•,•„.-----,,.7-..,.,.! ,; -..':...,,*•.-.-..-:••-. • - ,. --" - -: -• zld•"IL,t,-", ' :," '- ...•',3.-,„. join the Tualatin ValleyHighway, the ,;..-2.,..2_ .,,r.:•••,,-. ,,-.-, .,,-,,,.,:. .:-•,. ,.!•,.•,,,.-•-- ....--,-:••-•.. '4,1,, ..",,:....e .--, ,...„. ..----... ,-, .'•.'''.:,:--..;'..;'.. ''.... . , .e,,,,,•!., ,.;.--. .....::.'-.:s..': :...„'.'"-1";'„.,..4...,_.,,,, •.,..'"'.•,--,.1.,-;.,:!,-.',... lack of sidewalk , ..„,, ,,, , 1,. .i,;..,,,,,,,, , .._,..:,,, ,. , . ,1 . ,:, ,. ...:•:=- .., ..•-- , .. . .... ontinuity presents • •..., . .,•,,-.•:.. •,,.„.., -.•_,- .- .„, t„.---,„., . I •.,„..,-x.,-..-,7:-• .,-...,•- -. ,--•.. •,-, •,-,-,„;„.., c ••••‘... ,-,:- . i ,•i:„.. ..,, . •, ,.,., ,..• J. ,.:- :‘ •,:., ,••••--,...t.,,;-,.- •,-- -.,„. -,\i• ..,:s.• ,--...,..-; ,,. 4, .t V.`4,-' 'f.,, '.. ''.. .2.i a barrier to • 1-....-:--.....,-,•.:,:. .-7., -1:--,•,...:•1.J•";;_;.; '''-_,.'"'t!...'.•".'...,..--'s.:•:."4...."=.:- ;".: l''''. '.-1''''.:7..: :-.."",,';;...,•.::-.1js.:-.''...''..; ri ; • thus Iv ' ,-, t,, ":•-•-■:•4,*",-,A L.'.•.■,1' ''..1..., '`, ..:'•A,.-:---t"-.' .*:- *•^;,"•.' ..;-.1'''*A" t•-•`.-• ..,.. , _.*---_ •,..., pedestrians, e., . ...,.,.•,.,,,___ ' t:...,,-.,,,..,..!-,.,,•-.,.....,,-,, 1-,..--A'-.''!.•,*.A *.- ' *.. ‘.4.1.:, -,•''..;'.: 4. *-* • •*. , 'A....`:`• ..,-. • ..1 resulting in a rating !;-:---- .,...:„•;,,,z.•••,-..; .,.;.. ....•„,_. •••• .•,..-•,:-.„,...-,•,:••.,,,,p,, .N.,;:r.- r. .:,,„r.—-,''',,,'" —4.,--' '•,.•..„. .,':A.; ,...:.'-,'''S, ''...-: of 1 for this area -"_:;;'•...:,..,..7..* 4--;,'-'7:4ftlt,::::)• •`::,!-,::-:::.:••::.-c-_--..... .'...2.•;;:.:-....-.••,•.,•-•'•-•-• ,.;.;..-;,-_-:;:,.-777...--;;%.-,..';•..,:,....;„:.--,.::::::,..'..„--1,-;,..; • , ... .■.4:-. 7 ■' photo:Keith •••---...„------..,::-,---it--..,•0,-.-,..A.--- • -,- , --,,,,,,:. , .- -.. .. „. .....% ,s.-•....,.. - . :-..?,..;;';..s4r-'5•;:.,'"..'.,' .;,' ;.''''...!..„,.;''.,--:•=‘;'-...,..:*,-....•,1',."4' -,,...,- -. ,.. :.: =:.-----;:,, -..:'<:- r,,7_,,..?---:,;-r.,,....I,:'' :'''"..,,,. '.1,--.:4'.';'...4:5'7, .'l'''';..";';'•'..t.:;'-''.?' '''-::'''C'''''`''''.' '''''.''.-‘7.1:-..:'';`''%'':'''''" ;•". • .**;. 6k-fier",: ':'.1.'•,:;,6,',.':!...'1:.{,. ','' •''''2'6.'; -,,,"'6 ." ,,.-%-4';::.!",1::'..'k:6*,?`,, ',:.'"'' J'!'......... -'2- 7t. piP.....,..'.:---..•-•:-....1.•-.,..!,-' -- ',-..--,..- -,,T .. -•• . •• . , . .-.,...,..,.......,. ','"4•••'• : ii'''-' ,•• 4,. d,,,,e,..1•`i,4 'i*,. . '-... •••*,d'*-'...• 'tq 7",'d t. 1,•17r.t''.."' ''''^''• . .-' 1.57.4. ,...."1,;•.';.:',*'/'*),.*1-***"... ,..,.$.:1 I/' '. \.•:, , •66;e, • •e'•'P.',..;.1...,,i $1. „,.. tf Photo0: In ,..,,...,•, , ,,,;,,,.*•-.........1,, „,„--•,,,,' .„ „:. .„,--,..ii.,47,-,,-„?..•••!..1-,. „t-- -4--•-3.---",..'"k . * '.• ",.' '....A.,,, :-. northwest Portland, . 1-•-,...,.,•,;.J.K.,•,,,,„..,...,.;.,,,...a ..,,, ,_,.,:_i ,,,,, ,...,...,p„.,,,,,,t;, ..,..,,.,,:,,,,.„,:, ,i ,_,,,3,,,.. t ,.:,,,,,, .•••:‘ .••.-.:,.:••.;••.. a continuous ski- ± 'I4,.-'1. -t• .7., .:-'-'' t =.A., «A, +.,,1,,4,, ,.., t• ewalk ne ,. provides the basic • -''''-•:',• ' 1- l'.-' ,',,f•:rini•'4::-:-,•:•:. • :-- ,.1-4't ''• ..'ri, ,„...,,•••,-.,-,''-`,•`:-.-.-••••'?,-'-.,,-•!.:.g..: _'1 - :z; prow ••• iz .....Y:. ..•••.-' . ..-.--.• ..-,•.-.., ,.-.' •..?. .4..; .,,,--.4. ;-,...,,,-,,-.t .4_,=.•,,,•;‘,.:'-.-„ 7,:. -.7.! 1,- infrastructure for - f..... , - — ..,,,;-, ,. ••,., v.--..,-...,-f.:- ..,,--'reti s:•.•-,t1.4....-: ,•'1.,.---..,-/.7'.:4 . ..... ., • 's u) .- , -",`",45 'kr.,li :--.....'1- l'...- :: ;'" - - '. - .,*-1 :'''■.1!..-;,,-•""+ .!,,'.. ...1,'.- 7i •-'-' walking,and ,--....,„,•••:, , •,•,-,...:,,-•,-r., ,.:-..: 2.-..i .4.•.--- .......-- ;,• - ),-0 7.. •At.--4.•1; - ,.':;-:'., 1. '•_-',....4 . •i, >“ nth,was "*.''; ...i '•:- ...,.,:.7:-:,r.,1-.:1,4`-t-' ',I'r-' r,-4'ri-'.' 'n.; :•':' • 7...,:'11.,'6''''' .:.; 1 jd .. t consequently- -•-•.... . ..„„..7,, .•.....„,-.-•.A 1.......:.,.,. ci,,C, ••■;;,4 ; ,:,:.-2:77-„,,-,4-r, I ,.' .,,.....-.„A)■.t. _:.,,r, i t.,• .:.... ...,, ....•(..-.., .—.'11.. •-- 4:24 t 14:A";-: :4 7"...,'!...,: ,,,r-',...",.*‘"g",-,-,,!:-.74'....,=V,.,4 .,--:, ,' rated"3"for it,is -... •.,,,,iouptsz : • :•••,,..• •:••••••••• , .-.,.., ,,:,••-.,• ,,Nz...4,4,-, .,..--,.. " ,•-..1.-.•, , ,•,,,I. ... . .... it 03 -„,-;; 1..;„-:.,,,.,ii.:.-`•. ,isms . ': . , ';‘.fti.:::::,,,,ki.:1'.1,4,"1_4,R-..!,..;;:14....-:`;.''-::..44 11'1•4,'".s,T::.41i.;\.,:, . : — factor. ••.: 0 ;-7•7 „,-,,...,:•' .- , -..•liMP•••J.:,. --\:•'-" •-; .i.•-••••.---,:. •1411 I•-• . ., . ----,4.t-—A* -f,.....--lit 4---, • ,t A-Z.,7 - Liu holomew ' " 4,-- ii •,:.:-,.--: ., ,,,,.--,..-1; r,-,:. -. -- .1 photo:Keith Bart g_r,..,,, '----:'.il.': , ;•'... '7.. ..C-=:-rz: --e, t•.-- , --..4:,:., .. , - :-.,,Ammoid---, '.:- ...-;- .:^: ',i,.`,.. ,- ''';,::•':.1:'V.'-t-kr ..:.•, +'"' .:r" .;.1.114-:"„„.," --,-•;0,';''''' '' ' ' .,_iiid ::::;.i.e ....,,•4,::•/.,b, • ,•,4-,..- .,:.. • "-'' • .T;---'''',F,:r.'--=::'';',;':: . :..-.--T•A.,..,--.,-::- - --'. ,. -. ., ,-..-.L-,., -,-. ..4.....1,„-,-...,.....,....,",,:..-.7.'....7,,,,,,i,...7,..2,4..,..,.......s,.i.4.,.,-...,,...'.,._ ,',- r••I_'I t'-77.--..--.-':'•-•','.'...,-:-,'''',. *:".,.....:•.,..—..-" :-••.-,-------- ;.• —%. .....-- I 2 ',.-•„,,-, ;:.', The Pedestrian Environment Volume 4A .,, 4. .,, . .,,..-.'•...- "„::,.,„`'‘'. 2,,1••,.-,' .t," '- - • -•. :, . . . ...- •:."' Overview Z'," , _,___O__,__-----------4- ,.. - • ...,' - * . . ,..■ .. '..., '':•. . , ' . 4'; Factor No. 3: ,.. I,....,.,... . . , ...- ,-,..,.. . ''. 2:- Street Connectivity ... 9„ ... . -...-.,-, ... ..... .L.: ...,.,.• "Can you get there from here. . • • e - . .. Another basic other Streets with numerous connected to each o e . t route than ' element of the pedestrian environment is the deg.ree to which streets- 7;-'.:,. '.. and hence, sidewalks-are c d „ .. connections to other .1e• , streedtseatdenendtos,olfofenor .eocpe . tt s . . . , streets „. ,, ts with cul-de-sacs, thbl ksdeasntdriancircaulmaropreadeirrnec . , ,.:„.., . , . . . ., :; . ,Photo The area •R-,,'•1i , : --„,. --, A -•-•- . . ,,. it„,,,,,:-A,.,.--,,,,,:z ,..,;--,-, ... ....,,..,„„ , ..„,: , „„., . .-,„_,, .. .. . -..,:e.e.:...:1 ,,,. .,,,,- ..,..____,.,_.,...„....7.....:„. .,-.2,-.,-f,::, surrounding the „,....a/ _ ..- ,. .,,, -.. ..,..,..,......„,.:f. ,,;.,.....,..,,r,: - ... . , IT hway 26 and ......A..- ---------- ..„,..Ls ..,...:,...,,..-,;;. ,;.,....;f0`.,, ,P•:P..:5%„,,,' ..,:;....ri...si'..,,.x., Highway ..-,....': -,.. ...„.„,..,..,47.7:,--,---e7---,, .--.. , ..,-,,-t..,.__...,., -,, -t,-,-,------. .:._•,,,.-..:-11,-..,..c...:,t 46.,..,,....1,---r.., ...,:-.,,1,7 •=- BCedlevard ar Hills „„5,...,10,:. .,., -,-,..., . ,,. ---,it-If ; vr-..:,, ,,,=.,,,,..,•....: -. .0,4. . , ,----.----, .--,- ou ' . ..:\ v!".-..-.....?.,),:‘ .4, ', ,, 1.,,17,,,f,,4s., .„,:,'77,..':''1,e--V.777.1.7--.":".',,tfL, IT%:,-.::1::.!,,i.,,If'4, .,.•,,-,2';i, ''•-4'-''..i1-1). -g.. . . ? .,,,,i,:<.■,r; -,_..-1.-------;.ex.„.4..- Q.:. ...,,,,•:- .-,,-,-.r.?!.1.:fr,. :.,...,70.,,•-•-,-,,.:., interchange in ,.:.,..,..:.,-<,,,,,vw ,,,,. ...3. 4 .. . ---..-.',4••••k ,•1 '.71.''s '4' '`1,'• -'. --•=1,, ,, ., ,,,,3, ,_4,. ", . ' •m - • • r,v,... 4`.-....,-e. at,',-1.....".7.T.,./.., :-.1.,t1 -1,;■„A.:.-:„.4. :■,.., l,,,,',..1,.:,4.„..,..t.4..h...,P,4_,..,,,!..,..5t,„,,,, ,,..,..,Ici,i;s.4^.s... :4, .4'.:i Washington County ,-.,,.. *,-;.'jtv,,,,c,i . .4..,, ,,:,,,. ., ,,:,_-„,..:4:■•..._ , • .. ..:„ ,„•;.A4.-...,...,„,4:...„,-„., ,-,..-..;::§:,,,-:..e.„.v.;i.,:,...,,,,,:::•.:--,..,..---‘-‘ -.7.-:fss-it7;i:..- is a classic ,-.. ,,i.c 1,-,-q....,..-, 1,•::,,T.,,,,-..;,;.....t.:„.,...,,A.• :7_e;;;.,,,•4:,'istfk.... 41.47,44,,,,,.,,,-:'L:4,'. ' . '. . illustration of a lack fif ,:.,%,,,,,..„., ,t.:-.t.:::.i''''''-'1le'.'!-.4NA'1/4:4-t•I';.- ,,.r ,..-,,,,I.:":"..4',7 •, ,,,', ..,..:,-;,t.;,,;,,,. ,, , -,7 . " ji.',7,-,•:. , .''''. ':-%".' 4-.4e*..-+Z/i\k•'. .71.,t,r; C•Fto...:'t9. ...';;0.1,','1''.../:'`V`.t-r<•••-44.'""•"''''4..'t.s.:•;''' ..'•;',,,. ,;■..-* ''•- • ''' --°:T of continuity. -:•, ...:'' '. .-,tki2. .:. .g`,,,,„:70. , '-,:r;:::::,.-4-\-;;:-_,..%,.%'::1.,...;-ts..c ...,i':A-,J::;%'z4.- ...'.„),.i .-X-...:-i-,::,A:':,-; -., :::„.,g--, ,,,,, -....,*,-L.:‘.--- ',.:,-,,-,--, ..,-,.'-?.,,---; ,.---,,,,,.., 4;i:a,„-0,',.--.-:-4'.e i,'-,,..'..-.,:-..6,‘,.%":,..'.• .s,),X,'..,."'.,-'‘;:'. 4..' ,,,w _1:...1,-..:ii,.;,....; photos:WAC ' .,,,....0. .- , 4,,.01,1,...c,„ ,1,,. ‘, ,70%,e?,1i.-1-.:e, ,„ .104.-....f.:`:17r,' .,4 :-.:4 .-.; :..: '...:SlItticoro'...7...;41.-..: CoPporation,...gene, ■,,t's.y? -''''..r.‘a....;r:77,ie.' .i."'<..t.‘,•••."..;1*..t'\'''..•..;•i''.._,,. .-.1;7k,. 1'1 i 1r-,.....,,,,,:t. r..-3,4,a1:.,- .--'4.r '•••• ,...P`' . - : Oregon •........1,7 y A.•-• ...,..,. .,,,,,,,-, ..... 0 ...4,, „,„,...).4 A.,,r,,,,c,10■-+-.4.,c„...._''',,%-t.a.,..- ..., • =.. -4..? k'' '•. `'''''i.,%•''. "....a4 t•••tt!,,:,,,I,A'. 4 ='''''..,4:.*1.'1"-,1, 4=.% .,-Irt, . .61.. I A-4,''r-,,....;.-zt.', --* ,,A, 4...11.--c. ''.'-' .,-;'-'-....: • i"?''t.--;'-'''''‘...i;:%.:1,",-.;••1•=4:41...„,v41.,.4.4'.'•.,-C"•%1C4i,,,, ,„_'W.:4:4...,i1,-.,4•-_-.,. .,''''-':i,'''',1'- ''-'',."7 ..r'.1,-, . Xrj." ',' ;*- ., , :-...,.. 4.,:-..-„.-......,,,,....... ...-.14 •-.. 5.■.* • _ •. •'... •-..1....V.''':. .e.,.'t ...'..,-:. • . ,., ,,, ...^■ 4 1,7:41.L.,;:4,1)Vt,7- -.- 6..---1. --- k,-::.,-- ,11-.-_-..,, --..,,, -,-, -■,:.f-t-,s,..T.-...5. 1-,,'-,...1- --' .--4: . --' ,,1 '.* 41Vir---: t' 7' '.:',:'77f7'.-- ==. '•4' 'I.*:..';',. •77-Vt,t-$1,4•41.'-li.r..11(.41:-•:.;;,*' 1111'' 'Ar: ' ..;41'''''41,Ii' edra‘---.4•"."•1•'5..3*'•%'"••,-'4,4-'"..-'•-•....t i' "■-:1.1 ., '1.-..V.1),1•;.. •.`.2 `.' 1111,I .•11,,,,.1._ .:, II ,.,,... ,....‘4..,...,,...1.-..„, '•;,-.:.. .,/ .1,......i.--",,,.. v.v..:-..,: .;,.. - , 2),.'-' .4 --':•=4•;ft—':-.'11- '— t4-;--- .t=''''*-- :'(11.4al't.,V,T4Rri. —,l'Cj. %-S;.1"flieg 3111W• -t.6.;:q-1:1 *r'' • 7C...::,;.,..., a".;;;-*,,"7.■,,,y31,4,figiiiiiw-,4.--:,--$.,,,,c1,,--17,...T°:Zi.ff', '11., " e: '4,', - . ‘' ,--''-'''‘.7'--;-1 lr' *,,.'•;*,..1, southeast Portland ..,-.,,,,.; • .--, '','•*.. N:``" •••• :1411'.711.:: ..:0.'.•-• .''..".14-'-lit..",•7.4:tt4ie•••-•■;,r.7,,.;..e•''‘, 1.,:. •/,' .,•4 7.:, ..,1,.1 4.-''.,'S.'•v_7..,,.:. • 1,,,:.'4-...:-;=:, neighborhood,on the other hand, ,1-4-.7f;:cf4t, . 1,,...-1,,,,,,7,..>t-•?.;.-...-..,.....;,Nix.=..~.;,-i-..--.:':,:e•-.,,.*,-:- i.....:,-,:-:,.'i -,..,k=.47:.1.-;41-Q,'N,-.:,,,,z...1.,-,,..,1„..-_,;........ z --; ,.. .,-4.,,iir...,-. 1:.,--.:-.1.4.,1-... ..„.:.. -....-,--,A ,:e:--.%. t-.,%,-::::,„,-.7. . , ..., ..., . ..- .,., ;,-----,-.-, „..,-,, ..,-......--1.r.,■■.‘"k,i1.""..,10" •••• •.' ., -.-1 `1.' -•j=i" %- illustrates a well- ,,... .,:.....;-.rt.,7......r.; ..,,, . ..,:r.L.•1.;!,>-..-::.,:1'• ',1,= ....,.... : ,....._ ,,.!,.., _,.......,rd.... ., (0., •- '''4t,=,„;i .,"..!',4!,,4,,.....„^3-;:iz to. ..%.,.,!..,z.t:;.;,1„(,.:".2 t.-1‘4 1,1.•!-4T:":"..,-,.;',.'1.*. ,,, -.= ,Z.1-...:10,`Iz", connected street .;111.,,L11...,,..;,. .,...e -.1 .. ,_,:. .,..s. .,,,t..;41...,....,,,,........,, ,, ,. ,,,,v,,,14..t. ,,.,, ,,,,..., rl rs x ". D- , pattern. • ;r-.7,•-',:.; ',..7e,.., '.. . ,.•,• . '','••••,4•V•a ,..".4.- '•'(,2.4 ''7. .21',..iX,..".,..t.•'1 .,::',7f1.• •t";•e„;;-..s.-=‘, ''4' ?.-'7--. _,. ..2 , t,-:.4'. •'..' % ' 18:1t.•.'";t1r,'.•'41i7f-t'740" ,"1 ‘%.,•t,,X.',_„,,, _i___,;..7;Is.4 -'*: -1,:..- -4-.4Y•t..itt ;..' -20,4‘..,,,,?-1. "., . i......• . ..,;.,..,.-";e....,,4„: ,.,..;1---3..1:::,1 LI"-;-114.-,,,,,-,,,t t-,-,---7,---., .,,4-'-'"- ::::;;:7'4 -• ,:."., '' Aerial photos:WAC '•-4.,-, -!`...z::?..-r."-'1 ... ''.0.4■.n.'` • *ifo:,,,...7 ' ,--....1-q %....; r?1,t..... '''''.4"P..:.: If14‘.'14'.4,,V.,24:;;,,,••::'t;'0%,e7:...‘„..C.e''.'^:.1'.3.7.1'171"17:' 4';;:'46.1•7,1Z1..Y•fe',,,,•..--s%..:...[•,7..1-;"-":'5• ••;,,,T,6,•-•-tr,, .11..4'T:":‘.?I'- e,.•..Hi ilt, ''.1 ' c4;;;-q.7.,,.'rr ^' .4.../e.■' ,'.... '"rx, ■:":',..i1,■••".'.; =I'*t.." li,...:*.;■••■ ,,,,,,,::,...,,:_,+.,,,,,,,, -,1 ri,,`...,,,-.::e.-,... ;.,.. Corporation,Eugene ',4,1'...q.:-.;ar•nr.,,,,,61.--,A, s ^ ,' .,, r.;,,....„.,.., ._-_, ..:-.,-.,,,.,{,...5,":‘'..;'4'Z...'.0e.f.,•,,l,'I*p,-../......i: t•".fir. -, e„...,,,.......:, ,V...eitc....1,1■,...z.,,T1 .■ Oregon ,6"..1.,-:•NA.,..-,,,-4 —.Y.,''4' ':: , .-,4\....-...-.), A1.-,:,..5,44 --z..--, 4-,r- = -4:-.- ' = ;..".....'■■&,.47-.K„ .......=7--..,. ,.,^„.,:i-_,:„4,... 5,,,4 ..,,„.•.• .•',,, •■.)...,,,.....-:,.....- t-1 .....--:-..-,t.' . iu ,., ,-A,P...v.e...,:.,,. ,1 -tf.,-...t..::, -,..1,„..!...--;.,.,,ci,1-......s 1..,-.v.-.1.,,,,r.!k,'N':::„..:1.1,-7,#.t.:11,-;.- ...7., •-Ai+-4,„„,:-,t..-,7.4 '''`."+,.,„'.- ,)e-s, 4, -'*ff ,V;;17..,,'=..7,9e-:•01.'W"0"'-..,e'X,-'crj-111.1r1:1-:'A".7.F41.,"':".1",-,.s.1:1-,e,".1,4 -1/4' .•••1 •'''3,t.$4 : .1, ...I ... '''.;;7"."' ,A47 -:.••,...,',-4-...,,:"-••'•..''- .41,;. ,.V r..A;,•Ire•'.', 4•4,,- 4-- , ■ .y., r 4.„. . s • *44"4/..' •••:.' ,..',0,:•••,:i.j.,* .%‘..;•;',..1;10, ,.... '` y lc,6.,X'',..121■......'4 ilt 1.,1.14..tLt .1:1...;:g.' ....7.,„..--e!...77. • ,,:. ..: ..:".,,,,,,--.54- .jr-4,0-.."''•"=:14;4`4;`:::='1.:.,;S :.4-*tri ,:,:f3;;.T1.:.N.::9,ift,•;--7W-.4.2 :iirt2,-- .;.-4•:;,.:','i:-&,.: -- _,,. -,,,404,1i.,-„-:, .., ,,,,.„..; 7,- -.= •,-,;NI-4'-`--,.rt....4.'•-1,1-r--4::....1-.4..s.-..-41f,";-. : . , ;-'41'''"‘:!4"..:.'S`45.:=CV::: -/.--i-'!-IA--•- ''1,14.4•.-117,2e..ttr,.'N. t'',..2';g•=ft,''..ti - ..s..„.n..,,,,tet,...t.-4.41.: - ' .- .1V.,:.,3,:-.,..4-7,.....:'•.:,&1:7-..,:z.L57:5.2; ;,4,1:32_,,,.iii''' :1)T.L'zia.4.1.;'-ta..+W.t..., - .,:. ''',',.',..":..■' - - i.;...7 ;',..-i.:'.•., .,. 4. , ... .,.. The Pedestrian Environment.. Volume 4 /2 "•„!.." .'"4'4'. ".,".s. ......„- . • '' ''''''''''.' "' ::'':ill; } ..'ma overview Factor No. 4e .�y Topography 4: i r "So high you can't get over it? Lastly,the degree to which an area contains steep slopes can affect its pedestri �' an A -? friendliness. While there is little that public policy can do to change topography, it is, nevertheless, a factor. — 1;‘,...,r-,-7:,- r---- . — -- .. ,-,,, Photo 6: Naturally, r •the Tualatin K ,3 4. s °K�il t 'wY— e4c,-S+ zi. Mountains, which ? , -,..3 z -- : -.^ t:. • .-=.:.' i ? � N.through the -" ,-- , t , - _ _ t ti6 ` ,■ ;region's mid- �■ - , ' J r section,present a . �\ - f • ,Y °, 1- topographical pedestrian barrer. a t ..''..'"...1...-..4.4‘"4"*,'1 i t i 44. ,.v....,1 .,,_,, ', ,. ,rr P •,.'''',....-....'i f^ '. 1 fit, e,, i s '! r i f :1,4';',.1 1 t 'i■ , 1 ` photo Keith Bartholomew \,1 i y } r.-4 f t 3 3, S r •, x te . 4• _ k.. +. .5 S fu ".+ :TMMY '.: y k � T. .st2 1-�{w ��1° g 1 `. � aJ � F3 .-„....„.,;....;,..A.:„..,, *. `, ,,,,„,,,I +,3w"< ..''sy F - Y e :c., :i , `ax ,,,,,-'^ h-,.. . 4 '`u. :-L - " , �§ '% :;- w :i , a.. t c -an . �' t.=} �— 'tea FS 5 ,.^$140- ya " , r,- >•-x -T+ Ft.. .?f s "_ y i-,. , ,? ,. •' '"'' .1 } -`,-+.avu. ,- .- - t. pr f-,---::.‘,.-4-...44-4- -,. ,w " .y" 9r , { :t _ _ - �,- -*..,,,-,,,I.,:'- Photo a: The r.1-.4:-!:fit :.4., majority of the t __ -- -- - _ _-___------------------- region,however, is _ _ „,_,,....-e•-_,-_,--.:-. .,:,,,,._.„,..2. _ 4 relatively flat. -; U) ", photo:Keith Bartholomew 1914,, r Y _ - _c_:.„ ,.."1--;-:::-.--,-:._ ' - '? ql - r .�.rs " c. [ Y .. 5 1 4 : S i:'-'- 2 ''Z'e--�vrt++J � = t ' >w^7"sJ r !rw .M . k •C *-";2:0.,-,J14..=" ,r s 4e£ t■ —j � 1 � ; i 3 k •k} ' -0 .1,1...•* 14 't 0 r .. II, { t�r, I,, „. .,• .., .'L• .{ _+ i a c.c : ' ,v F h V t} JFSY-it L�; (P`F ♦, t F i J:F xs(4 n. `, ,!7 ,-,,.•::„,,. j ^W�; �. 4 k >.�j , --;!,.'...,,,•i.,;:, r , 1 14 The Pedestrian Environment: Volume 4A • y }1 M 4 4 ''y` Y 1 3e \ '1•i..:.1.-'.2'.* ° .... ..'''•,., r . 'jam •, r ....4 , Chameteristhrs ofPordlandDatoset { s Characteristics of the Dataset ;, ' The dataset used for this analysis of the land use impacts on household travel behavior is derived largely from Portland Metro's 1985 home interview travel survey and the regional _; travel forecasting models. Although this dataset contains a variety of useful and interesting information, certain constraints in the detail of many of the variables make it challenging to y . use this dataset for explaining travel behavior. r Data such as income and auto ownership, which originate from the survey responses, are. ' specific to each household. Survey responses to trip information are even more specific, .'`, providing detail on trip distances, purposes and frequency by individual household members. ;# '4:'. Conversely, several key variables regarding land use, accessibility, employment activity and w .3 residential density are only available aggregated to 384 transportation analysis zones, thereby sa :> grouping together several potentially dissimilar households.s As a result, the analysis was `i ,. constrained to look at overall travel behavior, rather than trip purpose or origin, for the over s:'; 2,400 households represented in the dataset.. _ . - - .. . d 'r l e. an addition, the dataset may not fully represent a typical cross section of Portland households, d. �' Although the survey was administered to nearly 5,000 households at random in all zones, ,' .• complete coding of survey responses, including geo-coding of trip information, was only , { performed for households that indicated at least one or more members making a transit trip. `s,.. . Only about half of the remaining majority of households (that did not use transit) had their S, surveys completely coded. The inclusion in the sample used in tins research of all households who made a transit trip and only approximately half of the households who did not make a transit trip on the survey date may introduce a sampling bias. However, the over-representation of households that use transit should not be a significant problem affecting the reliability of conclusions, given that the study controls for auto ownership, income and other socioeconomic variables. Such a bias will be present only if we assume Y 4 that there exists some immeasurable aspect to mode choice decisions which operates solely for households who manifest a willingness to take transit. f:. w Another shortcoming in the data is the under-representation of the walk or bicycle trips. The n. survey dataset only includes pedestrian mode or non-motorized trips of distances longer than w six blocks.'However, in areas of high density and mixed uses, many trips/trip purposes can be . so .` accommodated within a six block radius without using auto or transit modes. Since the purpose of this analysis is examine how land use patterns affect travel behavior, this gap in the _ dataset most likely leads to underestimation of the role that higher density and pedestrian friendly areas play in reducing reliance on the auto. w • 3 Complete land use and demographic information was available for only the 384 internal zones of the 400 total J analysis zones used by the Portland Metro travel forecasting model. The other 16 zones are outside the regional . , :4...r04:. boundaries. },,.` The Pedestrian.Environment.: Volume 44 15 t: ... . . . • • • -.. -.... •_,. , '.:,: ..;',•■• :—e;' ' / e ^ •''t .9'0') . '.....' . ...' ''''' : 7‘...;'1...1 ....Si:1,..e'1:. ....4,11°••.4......?,'.-.....,'. ^1,t1 ry.•., a.,,t ic .■..- i*'.•, , ..1 , ' 9' *1./ 4 4, "' ,.., ;15 r, -,, 1, ' ..•;.:;;=.41/4", t:- -:4....--'t.i -..:'. it' v.°1t=:-: ■JA*,}),if-, -.,.4`■ , - :-'`.k'-'. . -$,...-:' ' .ff-}:,.14,,- ,- •,.:; 4,--' '; - ::':':'1Z171:''‘' - 7-i(7:',"1. ;.f.: ,..4.)i•I . .-;:i",.. ;,.. -,....-,,-..,'-gc-le..,-;;;-.:1k, '. --. ,. ,%. i ifi'v.;-1 seilli„ii ,i.2,..".„-:--. ;...":4,.:.,....:.-; l.r...--;, '3..'„1. '114 '• • ' ' .-: :,-.4...f.,,,, . .41,c, --1 .1 ?i"t-.1.,.i' t).V 1,..,1•'''.' . -::. -.• -.:"....:_-‘'-."-i:: ....-f 4.-,1,1,'-`-",-': , -,7.7-', . .... .e.'-!'':4 ' r':I: • . 4.--'.•,.._-•. t.'..:,7•.,,;,-,3,2.1.3/1 :.:'-:-';''''.:41ti-,;;) .•''' ''jkl s . :' I .-',: .." -''. .-' %'‘,...",,,.."::'-: 7,--'':' .1, •;-;•.-1.-gti,..-" . .e,.f ,'-'-'-', . '..;oI ,';;;';''' ..„'",''..',1'',,r''''';'-';'..--,.,,,....,!';'-'-;.;• '"-?:. '''''i4i 7.. -1-. :- :' '':,'" -':'.'-:'..--...--.•.:''.,:`,,.,'Y'"-:,..Piaslkik. .,,r,ileeks:.III 4'1.1'•::'' ..„...., ,,, ..., . .,„...-, . -7-,-,0..wrii.,-,..' • -1. %.*kt. .1A.It.,i.:. r , •-" 5:. ....,:- .'.....,. i....- ;,..:.......---:. t. •!. .,$11f,i k.; st,z..tlitt..%, ....; V., jr. ... ,-,....-1,w..1.--- '.;4+, .. '',.•.'•;r• ,• 1*, vitt .1*;0.,' .1. ; ':-.''',',, P,":".•,;` ,■.,`-1.,- ,;'... ,.1-`;, , :, -'1':'''',-;• il,),.` ,,,I ',.„,.:,,,;.,..-,•;'":':.;,,,,,.`%1 1'*;. , ..4., ''',.■ ''tc:*)■'., Ili,. ;'s sr et-..;f•S i '','''',. At,I , •s,..1. • t.:4 ,.' ' 4•'••■•••-,Z.r. S. •4-..-',(-4.? 1. ''•:. ,,. •t„.• . .. i .,....,, ';'!,:',i,,i,,,...‘,,P. :,.;41'...,',v -..‘' b 1 i, '„, • t: -.4.1' :Pi I,o ' • • „•,.-'.....:.!--ft. '''''..4tr.1,'*".. 't1 .•-•-t:"•1 :'. . `,. -1. il t?.4:r` •: , . ;,,t .....„..;,.,, ,,..,, 1.,1,„0511rw.. ,.r., - t t,'"?..A.;•:,`,,...,":-..L.“ ' '.-.'' `. ',...'.-• 01":'... ')■"-'.N.A.,•-ti.'-,;-'',., i e":"i` . .....o-t;t ''..‘-''"'.....1e'•',---1-; 0 i-Pr', ... ..1 .-.....-F.ie,................,.m- .4 .t. , -.'41 I..,:-.4:',.:.':'....;,,;:.., ' -:,,-;:•:-...i.1": te.•'.., ti.l?L,,,*`,'"•...^ .-:,*.-f„:',-"1:7.7 - . '- ' ,- ,. \ , . ( '.• '`... '. --: :.. , - .. _ - • ,„- -, •- .,-.-- -4 , _ . , . ,....,_ • • . . .. , ., . . a..s • - -... ... .... .... . , s•-• . , , . , .{ ••- - ' , -f.;;;i:':., ...::.-ii,'. .:.'•'?':'.';:'.,::::,";,, ':.".'''‘..,:, 1,..:,,, .„ . -■‘'''`.'''' ''.--'.:1..f:.-T. :'+- '''',',''_:' '•,.....+.-''. .^: .i''' '' ;7t H usehold Travel Relationships s` a; '. Household Travel Relationships 111 Travel Mode Choice Relationships - ~ :u:r , =r. Information on over 15,000 trips generated by more than 2,400 households was used to examine the relationship between zonal land use patterns and the mode of transportation a ; >,; chosen for each trip. Auto, transit, walk/bicycle and other modes of travel were compared ' across four measures of zonal land use characteristics: two categorizations of PEP, household ' density and transit level-of-service as measured by employment accessibility via 30 minutes transit. While a whole host of variables affect people's transportation choices, including a • , . `.,.-T;; variety of land use, geographic and socioeconomic factors, it is illustrati ' illustrative to examine the distribution of travel mode choices for individual measures of land use r Pedestrian Environmental Factors '• 3 ,� Table 2 lists travel mode choice statistics over the range Of values for the PEF. The data clearly shows that households in zones with higher PEFs, i.e., pedestrian friendly areas, tend i ,;w to generate more transit,bicycle and walk trips, and fewer auto trips. In fact, households in i zones with PEP values from nine to 12 make over three times as many'transit trips and nearly r:; four times as many walk and bicycle trips as households located in zones with PEF values from four to eight. Alternatively, the latter group of households makes about 94 percent of } their trips by auto as opposed to only 80 percent for households in the higher PEF zones. Table 2 >A ' Travel Mode Choices by Pedestrian Environment Factor C ' is '" PEDESTRIAN - - ' 'ti'4''.,'.1- ENVIRONMENT AUTO TRANSIT WALK/BICYCLE OTHER TOTAL, FACTOR 'E ,. `1 4 1,308 94.2% 35 2.5% 30 2.2% 16 1.2% 1,389 900.0% • 4 t.. {.1: , a:„ 6 2,400 94.7% 59 2.3% 41 1.6% 35 1.4% 2,535 100.0% 6 2,607 94.3% 95 3.4% 38 1.4% 25 0.9% 2,765 100.0% �;' IL 7 1,78E 91.3% 98 5.0% 43 2.2% 30 1.5% 1,959 100.0% 8 1,103 .92.3% 45 3.8% 35 2.9% 11 0.9% 1,195 100.0% ; CO 9 1,067 86.7% 96 7.8% 43 3.5% 24 2.0% 1,230 100.0% r 't 10 771 83.3% 98 10.6% 40 4.3% ' 17 1.8% 926 100.0% ea 11 1,796 76.3% 256 12.6% 225 9.6% 37 1.6% 2,354 100.0% 12 625 70.6% 84 10.7% 58 7.4% 18 2.3% 785 100.0% 1 w n+II 13,465 /38.9% 907 6.0% 553 3.7% 213 1.4% 15,138 100.0% Trips which involve more than one mode (auto, transit or walk/bicycle) have been grouped into the mode 'other". Included in this mode are trips using equal combinations of auto, transit and pedestrian modes such as auto-transit trips (driving to a park and ride lot and then a , The Pedestrian Environment: Volume 4.4 17 ✓ i rk _ , Household Travel Relationshi r as 1 taking transit). In addition, this category includes school bus and tax trips. Other-mode trips { account for less than two percent of all trips,and do not vary significantly with zonal PEE. { Figure 4 graphically depicts the non-auto mode shares of household trips by zonal PEP In ' general,there is an upward trend in the use of pedestrian and transit mode as'PEF increases, becoming particularly pronounced as the FEE value exceeds eight. _ ''Figure Non-Auto Modal Shares by Pedestrian Environment Factor(PEA) `' , ' .i ®h a a 25.0% • \ OTHER � O 20.0%. ' .�E ; 15.0' TRANSIT t r n. 90.0% r .s, . ; M.''...,'%IIlll l"*"''..1„.''''■-1:t 2:,.;. Z 1..' I 'a 3.a.rL test. Ylti,7 ;11,::;.1,.-,,:...1',.1 u',',.„.P... ..?y.,•. ;. 4 5 e 7 a 9 10 11 12 a . . ZONAL.PEF 4;,� Contrary to expectations, it is interesting to note that the proportion of transit and pedestrian r e..,, ' trips is lower for (ones with PEP values of 12 than for those with PEP values of 11.—A ' A possible explanation arises from the fact that a much higher proportion of trips generated from PEF-12 zones are from households within the central business district than for trips generated a 'f ti:, from PEP-11 zones. It is conceivable that for several households in central PEF-12 zones, more trips/trip purposes could be accommodated by walking less than six blocks than for :' 0' `: other areas where similar trips would involve longer distances and/or other modes. However, >z trips shorter than six blocks are not accounted for in the surveydataset. Therefore the PEE- a 12 zones probably generate more short pedestrian and even transit trips than indicated by this S `' dataset. Pedestrian Zone Categories Travel mode choices were also examined by -pedestrian zone category, a five category measure of pedestrian friendliness which groups together neighborhoods in various geographic locations, taking their pedestrian character into consideration. This approach { 4 r� 18 The Pedestrian Environment: Volume 4A' a er .• ' Household Ti vel Relationships takes on meaning,� ,:'' ng in the context of Portland when one considers the relationship between " regional location and pedestrian amenities. t ' The City of Portland accounts for approximately half of the metropolitan population on the Oregon side of the Columbia River. The oldest settled areas of the city were developed in large part as "streetcar suburbs," supported by a large network network horse drawn`and then F eventually electrified trolley service.. As.„was the‘case of:other eastern cities of,the same d` ) age, the residential developments were improved by the same companies that owned and w. operated the transit services: .,. e t a ' k , Thus, in the parts of Portland laid out and settled before the Second World War, typical blocks are 200 feet on a side. A grid street pattern dominates. Most neighborhoods are relatively flat topographically, The central business district was revitalized in the.1970's with a well known set of pedestrian and transit oriented enhancements, including parallel transit malls, wide sidewalks, extensive street plantings and benches, transit shelters, a light rail system which '. operates on surface streets and a variety of other amenities oriented toward the pedestrian. The central business district traffic analysis zones in this study are all ranked highest in the r'. region in terms of their pedestrian environmental conditions. (The unique amenities of the CBD do not affect its score; the score is based only the four basic attributes listed on page 5.) r. ' t'. it should also be noted that the central business district differs not only in terms of its,high level of employment and high level of pedestrian amenities, but also in terms of the .: socioeconomic characteristics of its residents. Residents within the CBD include a large '` ~'° number of small households, many of whom have low incomes. These include a significant , ,;;b } number of students attending Portland State University, the urban campus of the state . ' university.system, as well as single person households who_are not_students. This mix of `, residents, perhaps typical of many central business districts, has a set•of travel behaviors d` (described below) which can be found in other less pedestrian friendly locations whose K. ' a aaa social and economic characteristics match the ones described above. at. a NY. In addition to the central business district, most of the neighborhoods within approximately o. , five miles of the central business district on the east side have PEP scores of 10 and 11. These zones did not receive the highest score (12) because of localized topographic conditions, though other factors, such as arterial street widenings, adversely affected scores in some zones. 0 . Thus, the City of Portland today displays a contiguous core area of five to seven miles -: square in which there exists a built and natural environment conducive to pedestrian • activity. Outside the City of Portland, however, there exist only a few small city centers which exhibit an attractive pedestrian environment, largely because they were developed in . "'' an era when automobiles did not dominate as a transportation mode. These'small city ,..e. centers are relatively isolated from one another. They have been merged since World War it II in a fabric of suburban development which is auto oriented. `,, The Pedestrian Environment: Volume 4A 19 4 i; } Househok Travel.Relationships Thus, for purposes of this analysis, the historic development patterns described above were developing g pe es.. The five categories 4. used as the basis for five categories of pedestrian zones. :`; areas.follows: F L.1 Z. Central Business District(PEP = 12) 1' 2. City of Portland (outside CBD)-very pedestrian friendly(PEP = 12) {`. 3. City of Portland (outside CBD) pedestrian friendly (PEP = 9-11) . • 4. Outside the City of Portland -pedestrian friendly(PEP = 9-12). a 1 5. Non pedestrian friendly(PEF = less than 9) tn Categories 2 and 3, as implied by Figure 3, are neighborhoods developed before the Second World'War, largely located on the east side of the'Willamette River. The central business district, while not delineated separately on Figure 3, consists of that portion of the city within and surrounded by 1-405. The pedestrian friendly pre-war neighborhoods in is small cities around Portland stand out, as a result of their scores, on Figure 3. The majority of the traffic analysis sis zones, where development has been oriented toward the , . J y y P automobile, appear unshaded on that figure. z , Table 3 lists travel mode choice statistics over these five categos+ies, As in the case of Table 2 • and Figure 4, the more pedestrian friendly the environment in a category of place, the greater the proportion of trips that are made by transit and walltfbicycle modes, The impact of the pedestrian environment on travel behavior is even more pronounced in the pedestrian zone ti categories than in the fully disaggregated analysis of PEF scores. Comparing the categories, over 93 percent of all trips are made by auto for households - located in auto-dependent'places, compared to less than SO percent for the CBD Similarly; very pedestrian friendly places in Portland outside the CBD generate proportionately more non-auto trips than their less pedestrian friendly counterparts In-City zones also generate more non-auto trips than surrounding area zones with comparable PEF values. ' The data in Table 3 and Figure 5 suggest that pedestrian friendly zones isolated in a large a. expanse of auto-oriented suburban-development cannot support the level of pedestrian, De { to bicycle and transit activity that comparable neighborhoods can support when located adjacent to other neighborhoods with similar characteristics. In other words, the '; extensiveness of pedestrian oriented development is also an influence on mode choice. • ,44 psi 1"#7. 20 The Pedestrian Environment. Volume 4sS 1 J • i r fir J i , �,: 4 i , ... i i ♦ .{i,. i �. �1 41 s s.1;1 ,. "a.:�. k. �^ .. W• `+i. .F� • - 11®auehald Tiswel Relaticeteln Table Travel Mode Choices by Pedestrian Zone Category .,� '~ P E D E S T R I A N t' . ,t'. , ` .::2"':• •.., . ,..;g ' ZONE ;,.,, AUTO .TRANSIT , WALK,BICYCLE OTHER TOTAL CATEGORY` . t (CBO.PE92) 112 49.6% 62 27.4% 42 16.6% 10 4.4% 226 100.0% s (In coy,PEF t 482 78.1% 74 /1.5% 7#48 % 16 6% e97 100 ors 3 pnCiy,PE9.11) 3,043 81.1% 39l 10.5%.. .252 7.0% 54 1.4% 3.751 1000% ° 4(Other PEF.912) • 311 89.93E 23 6.6% 8 1.7% 6 1.7% 346 100.0% '' Fc0 (PE9) 9,517 93.3% 359 3.5% . 195 1s% 127 1.2% 10,198 100.0% a �, .. All 13,465 80.9% 907 6.0% 553 3.7% 213 1.4% 15.138 1000% � Thisuggests that.the creation of isolated new pedestrian oriented developments on vacant , P P e sites in auto-oriented suburbia will not produce the same kind of effects on mode choice that ,2, traditional neighborhoods have produced, unless the supportive pedestrian environment is 4;• integrated, through transportation and land use planning,with proximity to a large number of employment opportunities and an adjacent network of other pedestrian oriented neighborhoods. The effect of the presence of all of these land use factors appears to be - greater than the sum of its parts. • Figure 5 illustrates the non-auto modal shares by pedestrian zone category. '� j :, Figure S `,,, Non-Auto Modal Shares by Pedestrian Zone Category • y ; 60.0°1° ` 2 ` 0 WALK/BICYCLE r: r 40.0% ,i r s. ' { t I 53 TRANSIT ' ' 30.0°k ,, .. p-. c r a t=, i Z 20.0 k : { V.", a\\\\ �' \ lin .-"'""'"‘"'':::-. . � _ i-mil +=-: . 7. ' f � Y 1 2 3 4 5 � f s-: ZONAL CATEGORY {; • S tfil . sue `f The Pedestrian Environment: Volume 44 21 i . 4.t `.• , .t , p} i Household Travel Relationships Density _ Residential density, measured as the number of households pry.' acre for each zone in the .: " '` survey dataset, was also examined as a land use variable afe+sing travel behavior and mode Table , J.` Travel Mode Choices by Zonal Household Density , t „., HOUSEHOLD . ?: DENSITY R: ° (NO.PER AUTO TRANSIT WALK/BICYCLE OTHER TOTAL ACR 0-1 2,575 95.2% 55 20% 54 2.0% 22 0.896 2,706 100.0% s' 1-2 3,144 93.0% 110 13% 69 2.0% 59 1.7% 3,382 100096 %. '1, � g' 24 2878 91.1% 169 5.4% 80 2.5% 31 1.0% 3,158 100.0% „-- --..-,, '.L., 1 3-4 1,925 88.5% 164 7,5% 50 2.3% 37 1.7% 2,173 100.096 ,j: is , 4-5 1,334 84.9% 134 15% 76 4.8% 28 1.8% 1,572 100.0% 4 >5 1,609 7E0% 275 12.8% 224 10.4% 38 1.7% 2,144 1000% ,. : a1 AU 13,465 88.9% 907 0.0% 553 3.7% 213 1.4% 15,138 100.0% .,.I "Zonal Acres refers to the total land area of a zone,inclusive of roads,public land,undeveloped and developed land. In ” j '' any one zone,residential acreage may account for 30-80 percent of zonal acreage. Furthermore"residential acreage"may ar alto include streets and roads. Thus,the relationship between total households per zonal acre,and households per net residential acre(a common measure of density)is difficult to generalize. For a more comprehensive analysis of residential density and associated travel behavior in the region,see the Interim Report"for this project(October,1992). L Table 4 compares ranges of household density by zone across travel modes. As expected, the ;= Y •4i: less dense-zones (found in the suburban and outlying areas) generate more auto trips than ' • urban zones with their higher densities. Of the 162 zones with fewer than one household per ,` acre, only four percent of all trips use transit or walk/bicycle modes. This compares to over ' 19 percent transit and wane/bicycle trips for the 58 zones with a density of four or more households per acre. Figure 6 illustrates the trend of greater non-auto modes use as ®- household density increases. CO L Transit Service . _ Transit level-of-service, expressed as the quantity of employment accessible by no more than a 'y uj 30 minute transit trip, is another land use descriptor compared across household mode choices. Employment accessibility via transit measures not only transit level-of-service and pedestrian access, but also the zone's distance to major activity centers, in particular, the - Portland CBD where the majority of region's employment is located. As expected, Table 5 . ;c generally shows that the closer a household is to employment activity andfor the better the y r The Pedestrian Environment: Volume 4A House/,old Travel RdauonshIps ' transit service from the household zone to major employment areas,the greater the transit and walIJbicycle shares of all household'trips. ; s .' '' Figre 6 + a r Non-Auto Modal Shares by Zonal Household Density, j:° 25.0% OTHER O ° ❑WALK/BICYCLE ■ z 20.5 ..Le TRANSIT 15.0°� �. / j, 115.0 • /yy ' x i a 4 . ,..,? :,..., { NSF•, lY � \ S f� {f Y 'i�r� i� 4 «j 5, 2S,... . . . ..o. p '' s t ,ii.,...,,,,....3,,,,,..i.....„..„,,..„1... .„ , 6 3 f r. rfrt� y; _ , 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5' >5 HOUSEHOLDS PER ZONAL ACRE f ''4 r One interesting exception occurs for zones with 30 minute employment accessibility via transit - in the range of 120,000-160,000. This category of zones produces less transit trips than the j' j == category one step lower. The average zonal PEP values and the average employment levels r„ , within one mile of the zone centroid are nearly identical for these two categories of zones, 1' which might explain why the 120,000-160,000 category doesn't produce relatively more j; s transit trips, but not why it actually produces relatively fewer transit trips than the 80,000 i ,4 , 120,000 category. Table IZ Travel Mode Choices by Transit Level of ervice to Employment ' EMPLOYMENT.: ACCESSIBLE VIA 38 AUTO TRANSIT 61fALJ�.001CYCf,E OTOff t r®:�(,' c. tdlN TRANSIT ..... �mimosu sasmsousamalannwass. 8-48,000 9,233 93.4% 329 3.3% 153 2.0% 128 1.3%' 9,803 100.0% i. ILI 40,00049,000 1,220 87.3% 101 Z2% 54 3.9% 23 1.6% ' 1,398 100.0% 80,000-120,000 882 838% 117 11.1% 42 4.0% 11 1.0% 1,052 100.0% 120,000+160,0(,0 1,f'73 65.0% 115 8.3% 71 5.1% 21 1.5% 1,380 100.0% x160,000 957 67.2% 245 17.2% 193 135°,1 30 2.1% 1,425 1000% All 13,465 88.9% 907 6.0% 553 3.7% 213 1.4% 15,138 100.0% ; , : , "r..., ; 1 ' ., The Pedestrian Environment: Volume 4A 23 '" A,. j j . .r y j { . ' Y Hausehold Travel Relatiorshtpg 4. , ri Figure 7 depicts how non-auto trips vary with transit level-of-service to employment centers. '` One can conclude that zones with good transit service and readily accessible employment s , activity promote greater use of transit and pedestrian modes. .;,, In Portland, the area located in and around the central business district contains the largest , - concentration of employment activity in the metropolitan area Approximately 15% of the region's 600,000 jobs are located within the central business district,-with an additional . . , ., 10% located in industrial and office districts proximate to the CBD, east of the Willamette `' River. These include the cast side industrial district and the Lloyd Center office district, among others. Thus, the data in Table 5 is implying that proximity td the central business . district by transit is a determinant of mode choice. :" Figure 7 Y Non-Auto Modal Shares by Transit Level-o4-Service to Employment p 3 +' j 35.041® K '` ® 30.05E % OTHER l 0 X 25.0% II 0 WALK/BICYCLE ,, ,� I II TRANSIT t, . _ k +, 2 20.0'14 t 1 F z 1°.(3% i��\OS��\�\� �^ { ,fy+� tgce� a 5.0% �i � , ,r� . ;ffi � S .' 0.0% ,,i''.,,,4"::0'..T.. 4 Te.` 1''�x. ,'.=4=".• -., 4:,1,2 1`' �,-'': '' I ` 0-40,000 40,000- 60,000 120,000- >160,000 80,000 120,000 �- •160,000 - -- 4 � ijF "; EMPLOYMENT ACCESSIBLE BY 30 MINUTES TRANSIT �. Vehicle Trip'Generation Relationships , An alternative way to examine the relationships between land use patterns and travel behavior , ' is to analyze how specific measures of household auto usage—vehicle trips made and vehicle , miles traveled (VMT)—vary with zonal PEF values as well as the pedestrian zone category. :; eo • Table 6 shows how household auto usage in terms of VMT and vehicle trips vary with the CI PEF values. Under the assumption that a household's propensity for auto use would be lower in pedestrian friendly areas, then one would expect not only VMT, but the number of vehicle i trips to decrease as pedestrian friendliness rises. Table 6 confirms this expected relationship. ~../ tea. , -; 24 The Pedestrian Environment: Volume 44 . ., 4 4 ,Y. a,: iitr.isehOM Tres vi l iielatiarrs131p3' 141. 1 --Teb!e b . .t. Auto Usage Deily%NIT by Pedestrian Environment Factor PEoES ' "4 y� T PER k "« •` VEtiiCLE TRIPS PER VEHICLE TRIPS PER a „ ENviRQNmEfSr :y k• E +9T PER PERSON .. l HOUSEHOLD • PERS® : ' HOUSEHOLD S 3$.7 14.4 6,1 32.4' * 13.8 5•9 2.5 8 S.8 2.4 .1 26 7 11.3 5,6 2.3" 22,3', 9. 9 5.1 2.2 • 4 10 21 5' 9.9 •a.0 2.2. 7.9 d:5 1.8 is 11 18.1 i ..,-it. 12 8.1 4.4 2.0 s: 18.0 ° � . „ 5.7 2.4 • Weighted Average 30.6 12.8 5; � , l';"..-',--::';''. Figure 8 charts the pattern of household VIM and VMT per household Person over the range of zonal PEF values.6 VMT per person is included to account for different household sizes f Y between zones.. As expected, VMT drops significantly as the PEF values increase, although. 3 > >:, some of this effect is likely attrbutable to geographic location. Since many of the high PEF zones are in-City and relatively close to employment activity,it is not surprising that trips ',' associated with the more suburban and outlying zones with their generally lower PEF values ', y tend to be longer,thereby increasing household VIM. i• _ ' , 1 }• ,, 6 VMT per person data does not account for rideshanng whereby the trip distance is equally divided by the number of _ 4 vehicle occupants. 25 ' . The Pedestrian Environment: Volume 4A ';.t r:• t-. .' '- . .Vii. ''t L , .,«. +i,s', { •{`'. r . i • e.,,..,-. , t, I S . ,, • aHouseholal Tweet Relates'ships J. 1a ,. Figure 8 K 4 y,. Daify VMTr by Pedestrian Environment Factor(PEF) VMT PER HOUSEHOLD j ,. a °•, •VMT PER PEPSON 30 i� 25 , ,; > 20 15 _ 10 tk r � , s 0 9 10 . 11 12 5 6 7 8 i- ,' 4 , ZONAL PEF 1 11 7 .. Even more interesting from Table 6 is that household vehicle trips and vehicle trips per person a, ,� also decline with PEF The more pedestrian friendly the area,the less auto trips households in that area tend to make. Moreover, the relative rates at which vehicle.trip generation and :, VMT decline with PEF confirms that average trip distance also decreases as. PEF values' Y increase. Figure 9 illustrates the relationship between household vehicle trips and vehicle trips 1,. per person to the nine PEP values. 9 t ar.:; } a ,. '*Y i; r , 4 au t' , {. S 4 x °' The Pedestna-n.Environment Volume 4A 16 . . ..------ Household..------a Household Trnvel;Relationships d y Figure 9 t: Daily Vehicle Trnad by Pedeatrian Environment Factor(PEF) .-,:o.,..„-4.,.r., i .•'.,,;',;,' ,-3.{ . -'"4:1-;,740,1,-, r =s VOIICLE WS PER tAUSEHObQ t s t;,,,r 1r ;4r r ,e-t VflffiSLE'6RW5 PER pERSeSi t_ �' J4 ` . c3 ..TM ` � .. 4 6 S 7 8 9 14 91 12 r, ZONAL PEE The various relationships between land use patterns and household travel behavior examined ' '• above are all consistent with the conclusion that neighborhood(zonal)land use characteristics influence mode choice and vehicle trip generation. However, any pairwise relationship may " { indicate only a simple correlation, when in reality several land use, socio-economic and ' `� geographic factors act together in combination to influence household travel choices. The '•-. 4n next section focuses on modeling these multiple factors together, to test the hypothesis that each factor individually and collectively does indeed influence automobile dependence. • is .1 1i t• ,1 y ; The Pedestrian Environment: Volume 4.4 A 27 fi ; • . ? / t�■� a {4 t {-:' � ..,..,..-,"4" n,; F h .S K. J 5 r 4 ' L Y: 4. ,# },4 ? • is , .. ,i -..,-,„`...-.1.-,-'1:.-1.'-i '''',",--:-•i•: ''''. .... .....':',...-, .,..i ,L, --. --- • ., - ,= ....,.,-4•..... •••.:•. ..-; .=''',....'.,'..'„. 1 :.,.=.,-,,..,..,-,-., ..':.:.,.....'..-:.....,...,t,:,.+'......; f..!.,:...'•...,..." •:-.= -...-4-.:1;•.-..—.--. .. • - -, ,-,, :.. -..„-f- ..:,-..,*- •.--...;,... s•:.,-?.. : .t..-s .- ..,;:::"Pi!..;•.:;•-•:.:.,.'.i::-,...,:..........., . ,..4. :,, ! •'''''''.."'.'.,•';• '.':.'-::•,':.1.,';••••:.:'`.:•, :..r:.':-,;.:.:-;1„,:t;:-■ • ''.: .;'.:1:;.......;!;-:''.'"" '''s ' '-'. '''' : , . ' ••l'''----._. ''.'' .' LEGiS ILITIf STRIP "1-,._-„,,:i-•,,..-,..:-,.4.-,:l.I.:-..;;:.•:.::.2.-;,!-„7.-,:,,...-,..: :-.,,: . — . .. .,. -.. .... -,, . , . '-'.. '.' i'.. / •', •. i-..._,.. . . . :1'... ' . , _ , ,,,,, :, ,.., .,. ,,,,.,,,..L. .;,,,....,:--...,,:,-....,i7.,-:-1::::,1--,.4i,1•:. ....i,,:;,:',.;::,..::1 , "' '.. 1,,.....,-..- -:,....--.'-'-;::::...,-,•,.. .::,,,....,,,:,-4it i P"'lrar,-';'..5''-‘---t•,'"'",-;". 1.".1,,/ 1. --,..--' • '' ._.;it-*;;..1,'.4t.',+i„.-1,:',:„.11".`,,t , ..`'.-..'-6"4.d 3 ''' ''''''''::131iAll . '0''''''' 1 :41:-,i--:'.:-;.4-J-1--- ..' -.• ..‘ '' .4..',-,--...••.;`7';'`-''.' :;—...--;., , ',1, .1* -...1, j.P 71; .-:--c2' '''. * ':,•'il'',...-',:;77:.-'--'-"...-.,*:.'""f,"= '-.t :''.'---..i'.:'-;.'::: ' . ' .,:.t.. ., 11:!_i...x...... r ., .. , s!„......0,64,t;. ,..:. ,..„; - ,.. .}y• -...... . ,:_.,..,...:,:,,..:::._-.;:, . r... . - . _... i ,„ - -.- I if?':, i, .i., ,, i ., 1 .11. .- ,5#-..:-.:.--..,-;t_,:!'.,:'.,:. •,-,:. ' •:••••;.„-,•,.,.7..,i .: ' ._ ', / .::?.: :::-...;-- :',.k, ., 1.-- ;, . . - .---, ., 10 .., _._ • •- ,... ---. . ..._ •---,::::??,,,,:'::-., ...,,.' - ‘,44:.-. 4....,_'.---... -...• -.,,_„:,:,.,:::,.77- — : ”. ;;:.;',...;!:'.1:;:.:;:- 0-..."..3.,..:•:_.,..,:•;-..:::.,•.:7,..,„, te;'.'.'-,;:::,:...-:-..: T 1 6 I 1 ••,*: '-„- .. •,:?:=,..11.--., ..1,--4. .';, ,1-1, ,.:--:...=: ----7.,.., . •-.. . •--.; ..;,...,.... .. = ••g•.••,','..,,,t•.4,22%:'• •.• • •`. ...•• 1 • ,. . ; . .'et',; :. 1 •:;',''''s.''' '4 ...,4.14' .1 i'•-:. . ',......L:te..,...r,..i' • -...1:''..4.•'''':'',,,,•:•!.;"t:'1.' :...• :: ''..' * ' 4 ,''.• - ;1-:': 1: :':*•:: 41::'t1 i''Cf ; i•-•1.1'.'''' t's•'Ill.....1.-"..7-L7,-*7:::-.',,.'.'1'..--..7---.':,,- : ' ..`: ?....,...•4" :':.-.';' -:''._.- - :-. - = -, , •,I .-- ''/' ',' q. f.'-',,:.f.::..-' .....i,.--a,'-:-::',::.-...:-."'.7.-,..;. ...:,'-' .,..,.-.',.4. .?' :-,, -' ;• ,..-- '..- 1.,,- , ,,,, , . , , i.:-.•:, 7,„,, ;;,:illt',,i1-4.--,,:v.,ii'..J..,.!.....,:::1- t ,-, !...;•-:..,•.. .$,;:‘:-<•„'....1:-.,...„1,'::--...--.'.-, : -l',"-,' : .".. .....'. z"'.'..-`: . ,,,;- , , ._. •• ii,ii. , .,4-., , itj.,... ,;:,-,--.2,,,...,.... i,,,..44,,,,,,-v,4,,, ,,,.. ,,..,,,..-,‘,.- ,. i.:7,-;,-,:= -•' ..t• .•- „.-4,-.;. -..--`, ,, ', -... •t-Iri..,, 1—:.•' ;.,'..--t.,. •::::,• •- ' ,. . ' ip-',-- :1. Y: : .„-,....,1.:, , , ..,,....,,-....:-. .„-,-,, ,,,,,,,..,. ...... 1,...„-, . .. .., ! . . ..,..., ......-, ..,.:\-, -.. ,,,,..] :,,, 4 1 .: ' ) .:.')-,* ,...- •,; -••..,; ,,. ., - .: - i,:: t Jr . ‘.,-.1.1..,i,i,'-', ,...`,-.:,.,:',--..--;;;-:,,,;:-.,...!; . .*, I i ff..:,:-,4 ;-4:::.-'1,, .. 7--- -.:.' ' -- '' •,'...,j-e-'-,', , : : ,, --:.1,f i."•„ ,,'- - ••,, ,, , * , ' .7,"' --.' ,-- 1'. 1:' '''''■ ' ' •• * ' '' ' - 5 , ,. , , .* -.."'s -'.... ' '4 -- { .,: m Modeling Household Vehicle Trip Choices dr : e 4 Modeling Household Vehicle Trip T Choices ' Two multiple linear regression models were constructed to explain how a variety of factors , . - affect household travel behavior with the objective of either affirming or refuting the hypothesis that land use factors are important. Combinations of independent variables O. generally believed to explain the outcome of a dependent variable, in this case household vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled, were analyzed in the development of the linear regression models. The models were designed to evaluate hypotheses regarding whether or not each "explanatory" variable, as well as all variables in concert, play a significant role in * explaining travel behavior. An important model objective was the capability to isolate the *-'. effect of a single variable relative to the others. For example, land use patterns relating to t • pedestrian amenities, as measured by the PEF variable, have been hypothesized to impact • ti transportation choices based upon observed correlations. However, the inclusion of other relevant variables such as income, employment status and location, makes it possible to control for their effects on people's transportation choices, thereby improving the " , j. , interpretation of the impact attributed to the PEF. ,?' The "goodness of fit" or overall explanatory power of a regression model is measured in • `• x • percentage terms by the adjusted coefficient of determination(B.2). In general,the explanatory F, power of a model improves with the number of relevant independent variables, the quality. of >z l' the data(in terms of the variability of each variable relative to the dependent variable) and the • ' }� quantity of the data (in terms of the number independent observations of the dependent and independent variables). As is often the case with transportation models, some of the factors that influence household vehicle travel decisions are unobservable or unavailable, making it odd•. ' impossible to fully explain travel behavior. This is one reason for the relatively low R2 values _ # ` in the two following models based on the Portland region dataset. . The other principal cause for the relatively low overall explanatory power of the two models is a lack of variability or variation magnitude in key explanatory variables. Several of the I variables are not individually household specific, thereby restricting the number and range of . values. For example, values for the transit level-of-service to employment, pedestrian al environment and household density variables are only available for the 384 internal zones in te a F the Portland metropolitan area rather than values for each of the over 2,400 individual • r- >> households. Likewise,income is available for each household,but its true variability is limited ,_- 5 r: to eight distinct values from the income range choices on the home interview survey form. < m et en The limitations of this dataset impeded the ability to examine individual rather than household travel patterns and hindered the robustness of the model to explain household travel behavior. •' Despite these shortcomings,the dataset proved more than adequate for developing,models for testing the relationships which are the subject of this report. The following subsections describe these two multiple regression models and their ramifications for household travel behavior. The Pedestrian Environment: Volume 4A 29 ,.,, w f#a . , • :. • • , :'V.', Modeling Household Vehicle Trip Choices 1 ., : • .• • Vehicle Miles Traveled Model A linear regression model was developed to explain how a series of variables contribute to the "'`,,� , number:of vehicle miles traveled by household members. The dependent variable, household t , VIvIT, • �. reflects increases in vehicle usage from making additional trips and/or longer trips.? ' a is During the model building process, several variables were rejected for one of two reasons: 1. Some variables .although expected to be`useful model inputs, did not appear to be < correlated with household VIM and/or vehicle trips, rendering it of little use in improving the model's fit with the data;or j .e"ei 2. The variable was highly correlated with another, better explanatory variable, a situation x , called multicollinearity,which precluded using both variables. t The latter case of multicollinearity occurs when two or more explanatory variables are highly t i s correlated or approximately linearly related. For example, total employment within one mile j; of the zone centroid was a variable considered for both models. However, a significant ' correlation exists between this variable and the variable total employment accessible in 30 '' minutes or less via transit, When two such variables are approximately interrelated it becomes • 1 .t; difficult to disentangle each variable's separate influence on travel behavior. If both are included in the same regression model, at least one of two coefficients cannot be estimated with sufficient precision or accuracy to be an acceptable component of the travel behavior ,,' model (i.e., the coefficient's standard error is so large that an acceptable confidence interval e e for the estimated coefficient is too wide to pin down the estimate as even differing from zero). r:, For the above example, the employment accessibility variable proved singularly superior in its <. ability to help predict household VMT and vehicle trips than did the variable measuring employment within one mile of the zone centroid. 4` Household size was included as a primary explanatory variable since it directly affects the number of vehicle trips, and therefore, miles traveled by a household. The number of workers 1„«ea in a household relative to the household size was also believed to contribute to VMT. Because the auto is considered a "normal good" (demand for its use increases with income), e,. average household income was added to control for this expected relationship to VMT. l Similarly,under the premise that not just income, but on-demand access to vehicles stimulates lie their use,the number of cars in possession by the household was also included. (, 7 Because the.survey dataset does not include any information on aidesharing or vehicle oczopancy,the household and ' per person VMT measures differ slightly from the measure of VMT per capita specified by the Oregon Transportation 'r Rule. In this report,VMT per person is measured by dividing household VMT by the average household size, The . Rule,on-the-other-hand, divides trip VMT into shares allocated to each person,for vehicle trips with more than one t.. occupant. For more information on the Oregon Transportation Planning Rule,see"Oregon Transportation Planning Rule"Planning(March 1993)p.13. k: r' 1 • ,;. 30 The Pedestrian Environment: Volume 4A 1 (e)!. ::z - > Modeling Hostachold Vehicle Trip Choices i For the land use variables, different linear transformations of the PEF were investigated and a simple linear relationship was selected as providing the best model fit for explaining household VNIT. The residential density of each household's zone was also included under the premise that higher density areas generally have land use patterns, including mixed uses, that better Tend themselves to making pedestrian and transit trips. Employment accessible within 30 minutes by both transit and auto were added to capture the ., transit level-of-service to employment, the viability of transit relative to the auto, and the geographic location of the household relative to major activity centers. It was expected that WM' would decline as auto accessibility improved, reflecting the travel distance component of accessibility, and also decline as transit level-of-service improved (transit travel times decreased), reflecting the improved viability of transit as an auto alternative. The combination of variables in this model explain 25 percent of the variation in household e...' - ...,e. VIN/IT. The remaining variation in household VMVIT captured by the model's constant term is :::',.:"'"e attributable to factors not captured in the model, including type of household, household ' r, location decisions and trip purposes. Of the variables included, all had regression coefficients with the expected sign that were statistically significant Likewise,the collective impact of all `. the variables together was also statistically signiaicant.9 Table 7 and Figure 10 summarizes the ` .predicted impact on household VIVIT for illustrative marginal changes in each of the explanatory variables. Table 7 +' t Household VMT Model Predicted Impacts a IMPACTOR DAILY HOUSEHOLD CHANGE IN EXPLANATORY VARIABLE VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED ,, Land Use Variables • r Unit Increase in Zonal FEF -0.7 miles Increase from 3 to 4 Households per Zonal Acre' -0.5 miles • :" , 20,000 increase in Employment Accessible by Auto in 30 Minutes -0.5 miles 20,000 Increase in Employment Accessible by Transit in 30 Minutes -0.6 miles - . ,4. Demographic Variables 35,000 Increase in Household Income 0.8 miles i.; x, Unit Increase in Household Size 3.0 miles Unit Increase in Workers per Household 1.4 miles CL" Unit Increase in Cars per Household 1.8 miles • I— Average Daily VMT per Household 28.2 miles t1 •The household density impa t on VFAT Is 6nser function of the natural Iogarthm or household density b+A is en exponential function of un changes in household density;therefore,the VMT Impact tapers off for unit Increases In households per acre as household density increases. �; 0 ;. For example, each unit increase in the PEF value lowers household VMT, on average, 2.5 percent. If sidewalk connectivity and street crossing improvements to the built environment • 8 The t-statistic for the hypothesis test that a regression coefficient is significantly different from zero exceeded the critical value at the 0.05 level(95 percent confidence level)for each and every coefficient. 9 The F-statistic for this hypothesis exceeded the critical value at the 0.05 level(95 percent confidence level). '` h 1 The Pedestrian Environment: Volume 44 31 Modeling Household Vehicle Trip Choi f Figure 10 impacts of Land Use Variables on 3 Ho.lsehotd Vehicle Miles Traveled(VMT) Uatlno.bHocskkcedSla r�mrr 'r,r ;' t,l y '.• ec w i i�'�t, r..N'rra Y�' � t{1: �,n 4 URN htc.ls AWN psr Holm ehold i ',r{} ' -',4.,4-..:,,A * } URNInc.ht Wolkom par Howshad ' 15.000lo:.IAHoYSObddlnmmo s .". = .. Iar.trees 2to4Ronsokiddepot , Zonal Acts =Redo Eitplaymoet within 30 x 20tth,e.UkaTRm illtln3O �a s:ii...z1% UfdtlRCHtRdItF 3.8r1. �'a v { 20 $S'/a .1% 1%. 3% 9% Z% 9% - 11% .. PERCENT CHANGE IN VMT PER HOUSt,�EHOF.D . . of a zone could be accomplished to increase the PEF value two points, they could potentially A . decrease the annual VMT of households in that zone by 455 miles a year, or 182 vehicle miles per person. Over time,the effects may even be greater as the improvements in the pedestrian environment affect transit accessibility and household auto ownership rates. Table 8 presents the VMT model predicted impacts from a different perspective. It lists the approximate individual variable changes required to produce an equivalent reduction in VMT. "' ,,.1.-j Specifically, it lists the variable changes that would lower per person VIvIT 10 percent for a ,`< household having all of the average characteristics for the sample, including the average size z of 2.4 persons. In using these conclusions,the correlation between Zone 1 variables should be noted. See Appendix B. Table 8 Measures Which Reduce VIAL"'Per Household 10 Percentto • Increase the quality of the pedestrian environment from average to high(four unit increase in PEF),or ' '. i. O Decrease the average number of cars per household by 1.5 cars,or • Increase household density from 2 to 10 or 3 to 15 households per zonal acre,or • Increase the number of jobs accessible by auto in 30 minutes by 105,000,or • Increase the number of jobs accessible by transit in 30 minutes by 100,000. Y,. to Approximate individual variable changes required to lower VIviT per person,by 10 percent for a household with average samples properties. ` 31 :i,e Pedestrian Environ,pent: Volume 4A' a: tr Mod elirtgHotaseholti Vehicle Trip daces Vehicle Trip Generation Model A second linear regression model was developed to explain a household's propensity to make auto trips regardless of trip distance. As in the case of Vic,because the survey dataset does ; not include any information on rdesharing or vehicle occupancy, all trips made by household members age 5 and older as either an auto driver or passenger were considered individual vehicle trips. Variables for household size, average household income and household possession of cars were included in this model,for the same reasons as in the VVff model. However,the household employment and residential density were discarded for not improving the explanatory fit of the model. Variables for the level of employment accessible within 20 minutes by auto and employment accessible within 30 minutes by transit were included to capture the transit level of service to , employment,the viability of transit relative to the auto, and last, the geographic location of the household relative to major activity centers. In this case,it was expected that the number • of vehicle trips would increase as auto accessibility or travel times to employment improved, relative to transit (even though trip distances may be declining), and that vehicle trips would decrease as transit level-of-service improved and/or transit travel tunes decreased. A series of tests regarding the PEF indicated that household vehicle trip generation becomes { 7 -• increasingly sensitive to-unit changes in the PEF value as that value increases. Consequently, a log-transformation of this variable provided the best`"fits' to the model. Specifically, the natural log of the difference of the household zonal PEF less three was employed in the model to capture how ths,pedestrian environment affects travel choices. The resulting model explained 23 percent of the variation in the dependent variable, daily household vehicle trips. Moreover, the regression coefficient for every variable indicated the expected relationship (sign) with statistical significance and the collective impact of all the st.r variable was also significant. Table 9 indicates the impact on household vehicle trips predicted by the model for marginal changes in each of the explanatory variables. • 14 py9J L` RA The Pedestrian Environment: Volume 4A 33 k 4' Model'dtag Ilettse110ld Vehicle Trip C.koieet Fable 9 Household Vehicle Trap Mode!Predicted Impacts• , taA ., `, IMPACT ON DAILY HOUSEHOLD ' CHANGE IN EXPLANATORY.NARIA43LE ; ' ry 3 Land Use Variables '' °' ° ."1 Increase Zonal PEF from 4 to 7 ,^ ' -0.4 trips Increase in Zonal PEF from 7 to 10° -0,2 trips 20.000 increase in employment Accessible by Auto 11120 Minutes 0.1 kips r 20,000 Increase in Employment Accessible byTrans.'t in 30 Minutes -0.1 trips' Demographic Vardabaes $5.000 Increase in Household income 0.1 trips Unit Increase in'Household Size 1.2 trips ` Unlit Increase in Cars per Household 0.7 trips' Average Daily Vehicle 7rfps per Household 5.5 trips •Tete safer PEF loyal on vermde tress 3s a Meat foretetlors of t?e n3t4nral log llhm o!(PEF-3)but la art estpcosollat ruricflon er Stse PEF value:therefore,the achicAs •9 tackle on impact or a east change in PEP tapirs off as Msereasin9N Motor/PEF values are reacher, Based on this model, a three point increase in PE.F from 7 to 10 would decrease household vehicle trip generation by 65 trips per year or 26 vehicle trips per person,which is on average, a 3.6 percent reduction. Unit changes in PEF have the desired impact on household vehicle trip generation. • ra • is The Pedestrian Envr onment Volume 4A t. Conclusions . 4 + : Conclusions j The research presented in this report makes the case that neighborhood (zonal) land use characteristics such as density, transit accessibility and a set of pedestrian environmental factors influence travel behavior in general and influence mode choice, vehicle trip µ. " generation, and trip length in particular. As a result, we can cone.Iude that the land use , ' characteristics of neighborhoods influence the number of vehicle miles traveled by it households throughout the region. • ,.. ,._ + Of the variables examined in this study, the set of variables known as "Pedestrian ;4 Environmental Factors" are the ones studied least to date. These factors include ' topography, ease of street crossings, and street and sidewalk connectivity. Our research shows pedestrian amenities are present to a far smaller degree in the parts of the Portland e. , ` region built after the Second World War and oriented to the automobile. It shows further r. that in the absence of these characteristics necessary to support pedestrian activity, transit ' patronage suffers and automobile use increases. tn.„ a':, -, at 'a The four factors identified as PEF's are easily identified and measured. However, they do • {+ , not represent a taxonomy of attributes which support pedestrian activity. Rather they are indicators of a set of characteristics which must be present to support a successful transit , and pedestrian oriented community or neighborhood. ;' One measure of travel behavior chosen for most rigorous analysis is VMT (vehicle miles 4 traveled). This measure, as noted, is a product of the number of vehicle trips per x, . household multiplied by the average trip length. A multivariate regression has shown that the Pedestrian Environmental Factors are a statistically significant determinants of VMT „ and thus automobile use (auto dependence). This conclusion controls for the role of n automobile ownership, household size, and household income on mode choice and travel behavior. ,'at " Significantly, reductions in VMT are not only the result of shorter trip lengths, but also of fewer vehicle trips. Pedestrian Environmental Factors are a statistically significant El. contributor to this decline in vehicle trips. While the multivariate regression is not particularly robust in terms of the proportion of L : observed variation which it explains, we have suggested that this does not undermine the conclusions outlined above. In fact, the formulas used to model trip generation in this report are those widely accepted as appropriate for this purpose. They contain the number and kind of variables typically included in trip generation models at the city and metropolitan levels today. The inability of the regression to explain the majority of observed variation in vehicle miles of travel may be due, instead, to weaknesses in the data , set itself which cannot be corrected in the context of this research. y 4 4 ;^. The Pedestrian Environment: Volume 44 35 A , • • 1 One mi g h t argue that th e phenomenon drscus. l hem- evidence that the built environment f influences travel behavior-is in part a result of a process of self selection, in which people disposed to travel by means other than autos select locations in...which they may do this t..r most easily. .However, there is a growing body of evidence that there exists strong latent { demand for the kinds of built environments required to reduce auto use.11. Further, there is little doubt that, absent these amenities, travel behavior would be further dependent on automobiles than it is today. Lastly, since the pedestrian friendly neighborhoods featured in this report have been in existence for up to a century, there should be little doubt about ;:: the cost effectiveness of such pedestrian oriented development patterns in terms of their r 3' benefit(reduced auto use, improved air quality)relative to their costs. In addition to demonstrating that the pedestrian environment affects auto dependence, the ,.'ttei magnitude of the effect is also worthy of note. The impact of changes in the zonal pedestrian environment on daily household vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled is ?_? similar in magnitude to the effect of other well recognized influences such as household age and employment accessibility. In summary, this research suggests the following conclusions: I. The adequacy of the pedestrian environment is a significant factor in explaining auto use, in combination with such socioeconomic measures as household income, `• size, number of workers, and auto ownership rates, and such land use,variables as _ zonal density and accessibility. • 2. Travel demand and forecasting models across the United States can be enhanced by 4 • •• • the inclusion of variables similar.to those discussed above in their auto ownership, _ mode choice and destination choice models. The ability of these models to explain observed variations in vehicle trip generation rates and trip lengths should be improved as a result. 3. Unlike the other determinants of travel behavior, the characteristics of the built environment can be modified by public policies and investments. Streets and intersections can be made.more attractive to pedestrians. Paths can be created into and through neighborhoods adjacent to arterials where transit service exists. Thus n. there is a sound, rational basis for public policies in Oregon and across the United t" , " States which r equire patterns of neighborhood and urban develo p ment supportive portive of '_° non-auto travel. f, {; 11 E.g.,research by Anton Neilsen of Rutgers University and others. • ., 36 The Pedestrian Environment.. .Volume 44 '.'' ' : ''': . * ,--.. ..--se * .... Aelaeowledgnnsnts Acknowledgments ,. About 1000 Friends of Grego z .,, .. 1000 Friends of Oregon is a non-profit public service organization formed in 1975 to protect Oregon's quality of life through the conservation of farm and forest lands, the protection of :` -,-,. natural and historic resources, and the promotion of more livable cities. The organization pursues these goals through research, public education, and legal action. 1000 Friends is a}` supported by its membership and tax-deductible contributions. 1000 Friends Project Staff Keith A.Bartholomew Project Director Mary Kyle McCurdy Assistant Director s i gyp. '1 Project Advisory Committees "Making the Land Use, Transportation, Air Quality Connection" has been made possible, in part, by . ,• the contributions of time and expertise from the members of the study's three advisory conunitte s. .: ~ r t National Technical Advisory Committee ;;3 V :. Jeffrey M.Zupan, Chair f; Transportation Consultant,Chestnut Ridge,New York X —+ George M. Crandall ; 9 Principal,Fletcher,Farr,Ayotte,Portland,Oregon t9 CU `' Elizabeth Deakin ' Associate Professor,University of California at Berkeley Frederick Ducca Federal Highway Administration,U.S.Department of Transportation,Washington,D.C. a t ' The Pedestrian Environment: Volume 44 s7 x - ' 0 0 ' ' : Acknowledgments'. Michael A.Replogle ti 1 Transportation Project Co-Chair,Environmental Defense Fund,Washington;D.C. William Scher Energy Analyst, Air & Energy Policy Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,D.C. 7 Policy Advisory Committee Meeky Blizzard Sensible Transportation Options for People :; William Blosser . Chair, Oregon Land Conservation and Development Commission; Chair, State Agency Council on Growth in the Portland 1 Ietropolitan Area A. an Earl Blumenauet '. Commissioner,City of Portland Rex Burkholder Bicycle Transportation Alliance '{ Jane Cease Administrator,Oregon Motor Vehicles Division ': John Charles i.-",1 Executive Director,Oregon Environmental Council Rena Cusma 4 '� .>. Executive Officer,Metro ,' James Gardner 4x, Councilor,Metro Y { Fred Hansen Director,Oregon Department of Environmental Quality tom- ,, • Michael Hollern .,",;,,;:*- Chair, Oregon Transportation Commission • Jim Howell .**: D. ; President,Citizens for Better Transit,Inc. Vera Katz Mayor,City of Portland Patricia Kliewer Citizen Participation Organization#I0,Washington County . Susan McLain Councilor,Metro .L: Gussie McRobert Mayor, City of Gresham r}, 38 The Pedestrian Environment: Volume 4A 1 Aeloxovvlydgnaeits. Linda Peters ti Commissioner,Washington County Board of Commissioners John Russell Y, ,< President,Russell Development company James Standrnng . ‘^ President,Westland Industries,Inc. Thomas Walsh General Manager,Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon Local Technical Advisory Committee ;i. F a t: G.B.Arrington Director of Long Range and Strategic Planning,Tn-County Metropolitan Transportation District '� of Oregon Richard Bolen '. ,` Regional Planning Supervisor,Metro Robert Brannan f: Project Manager,Parsons,Brinkerhoff,Quade&Douglas,Inc. Jon Chandler 4 Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Portland Robert Cortright ' ,, Transportation Planner, Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development { Andy Cotugno Planning Director,Metro Brent Curtis Planning Manager,Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation Steve Dotterer ' Chief Planner,Office of Transportation,City of Portland Kenneth J.Ducker Director,Centerfor Urban Studies,Portland State University Barrow Emerson a- : Manager,Regional Rail Program,Office of Transportation,City of Portland t �p Brian Gregor —I Senior Transportation Planner,Oregon Department of Transportation James N.P.Hendryx W Planning Manager,City of Beaverton .„ Merlyn Hough, Air Quality Division,Department of Environmental Quality ' Keith Lawton k Technical Manager,Metro 9� rf The Pedestrian Environment: Volume 4A 39 Acbowier�g,n nts , 4 ,' Etoug McClain' Principal Planner,Clackamas County ` A Scott Pcmble. pn.,..'1''''''' n ,t Transportation Planning Supervisor,Maltrsonrah County Robin McArthur Phillips T ansportation nd Use Planning Manager,Oregon Department of Transportation •.' S m Sadler '' Trar� ortation . , • sFi Sy Sg ciaiist,Oregon Department-of dr y. ) Ethan Seltzer D rector,;Institute for Portland Metropohtan Studies,Portland State L�nivers"sty . ,4. Theodore Spence Consultant Y Robert E.Stacey,Jr. Senior Policy Advisor,Office of the Governor ZJ i• Ron Weinman Principal Transportation Planner,Claclsarnas County ''} Mike Wert Transportation Development Manager,Oregon Department of Transportation i ■ I. ;.' 40 The Pe�estnon��ivrronmen I'oltarre 4# . kz 1 � yk t � 'i r a ,r AQk7fl2Wled;nle7DtS. ' : , ' .1, ':: ,,,,.'In ✓About the Authors of This Volume ; t .f i .•. Parsons •Ba• kerho Quade 8c Douglas, I ►c. Parsons Bnnckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. as the leading provider of transit. o-..lathing and design,„.- • , S •services in the United Stags. The fatgti has been involved an more than 75 perm oft t un's light A,. rail transit systems in operation or under construction today._ The firm's architects have developed '. -' . - .".....i.,:'-;....:'..".. concepts for or designed over 200 transit stations in the last ten years.•i ' , .' Brent Baker, of the firm's Seattle office,is the principal author of this report: Samuel Seskua, Cathy .i Strombom and Yours f i ehgh contributed to the research. y' d. 4 t, i 3 '$ F The Pedestrian Environment:`-Volume 4A `' 4k' 4 . { r.�,+, ; ■ ,• e it 4 . F t ,4;y :'.. ""t ''''',;',.,4,!;,4' �, ;!t< yid 1''�'1a t`L-'�ti� ;� a*p�Y �{ +i .� � t �f t Z 11lf tR� �1 YJ4. C f 1. iI `ors + Y 4 3 L ; ,....1.,"tV i 4i re.,+t�v.. fit't .s.;1 sJ.tL, n. ° t{ C• Q,,���,�vq!�'�t x r is vr♦1w 1°tr 4 '453"tr. ..Y�1¢°'o L 'P Ty-- s.,t ..FyC.S{o f�" "••• (( ' *+ ,,,5 9.4 '1•t5 S Ua , t1`-r, u e4" q' 1,1•!e-,.".•4.‘•''-157 9 s t w1i t I`e 1} i t tit'+? a... tit i .- a t7M ; a y :' 5 0;4��a 't +1 ti,�a....',`4l p }.y a1K�* 3 SI �i4tt."'�i�^rttt �'�� ,•♦. ♦ ......Y 4 F� 14{ 5 ,1,6 151 ';5 r�''d'�t/`t zrf h{F S�i}'�AI-Sus.r� 'fi' �'``F.Al:GC'e"t'j� 5 } tr tl♦ AL�.! trs¢`a4� fFrt V.'�jK l4 gi$ 1�i��t . ?r R,�' r ;� ,• 3 t �' 1;F7ti?..tt rt 1.x' *:44)1 i.1 t a' t 7 Psi 1 i, Y4 zt .2:$ r5s ': p'v 1 1 1 4 5� - 'i t` .Y F l'l� t r ,�.t Y it it St 1 91�z etv.�rrr t �a }�v o♦1'S,,; .,' ( t "t+Wv s'r A, , " .. ,'t F"`� t t itv.. '.5 � r'C 1'?t,"FN/o/�` 1 ,, a '"a�Z tt C` .*`o`"''�1 �♦♦ �3r F'S js,.` g i..),V.S14, _�'x" #. 1 )t 111 Se 1 h Ld LY." 1 .i.".a "'. T . 5 „..„.1 ut t� 3 a ..I ti 5{.-• '- .f YA� ,�..,,tr5 +ty�� ,f I ''f�S NIt.,�Y Y~} F '4,,` ' .�r '�' tmy:�Y;.,,-y,C2- ,t,-). ”' 4 Sr r;!1k4�b* 1 Y t' lri it +Jt�'1 •fir �•' y�i"N1',--,.;,--.1 _1 Y4i`r 3!".rr�Cf Or t -'41.`'t.' "t 4'9d t I. .. a+;'.`'+ a .e',. t 35fA'; � ;�t o �r. r r"t Y 5. YA r.' 3 4,,,;,...',"..N., jj rx n „t° tic i s:S 1 f r s 5"t,V. .4 r., i f 'F. r*�5 a ysa`"i x : s*F rP1`.10,:f ; ettf.4y ;i,,At`�`Kw�1 ' • 7', 94 �y t a } rt s#ss 4'. c r a 1� r')� Y 9 < {t: ,�x:Ly+utb •-' t t. i't' h �Yt �..a 1 T '9t q::: r tqs rt..r414it, 1A�,.{eu,.rf'''.,.',11,•-%.1.' 9 !'} �� w� 1 i 4 tit AFB c ;i� a �)'�1. >�.. + ps„cr r5 24 i m ';,,.,,i.1'f.�s<(r. t,i ! s � SS � h^7{it �� aa�' ,�•la l r * fan t� ( },x 5 A p ' ��s ;lii as c�g,� .,,t i t -.:4 W11,. ,'+c..t f e` t `.. • 7. tit • 7f ..-t _ .•.r. f ee ry �,9`11gti a ti♦ 5 5 .� r ti . ice. -, ;' _., ` yt� ( i r t w f, , n. t '. r k: . t` Appendix A J' Portland P core By Zone a Wit• t s k" is r n i ' s • 1..x • • • �, Y1 YI .....4., 1, .t i ' . '*1''' S v: t Lv ..._, .. .J y'v ,. ��'i 5i. .�+ �`, J �. . , 4't..!' +.r _ , .. K s .. 1 .. • .-j, k, n' .Y7n • J; A x LEG LB STRIP r .- .-: ! i a . � E it:....,-..... L: .. y ' 1 W -1 V y�1 V M V V V V V E9 `1 4p� S g 2pi pp 4p1 OD 8p1 y1�pp�i qpi w VIq E w w pA t A A Py. pp P A y Wt,7 W gy,7 gW wW g W W N1,1 pI,�1 u1,t upy et g+r r.a.a 2 r'r.►r K O m a V a w P.W N .•.O m�V.a w 1.W N r O b W Z.01 w.A W N+g b [O V a N p N+.�Yo(o V...Ot w O. N+ W p� in u W+.�d m Va Ot A W N+O:X9®V A w A W N+ ni rn P 00-w C7 w On w'w'w 01 w.w w'a.w w w w q w w-W OI w w IT V!w a OI.a IT w.w w w w w U w d w O!w Oc w w'w O 01 a.w Q 01 177 w w w w w w 00.a w a w W a w 01 w w d:_W++.+++++ 0 m 5 •www A APwa wA? NY.wAaA V APw AAA01 V a a w.ww AA.wwV aaOI a W V 41w01a OIawV AAw Aw R}V AV W V m01 V aRa.Aw+Nr++NNN T. m R . J .+-+ +...+r+r r++.+r.ft++.l.r.4 4.+r r r++ ++++++r r r r'+++++1+r r+rI6+444 4 r+r 44.46+++ 0. ca' g N w V w w A w w w w A A A P P? t N A p W n VWUA U N n O W N NM A N Ny+U 0 ®V-A A bN+O g o V o E R p N r p O 4W R 5O O O 4 a A W A + A g S . . !...,P 4 wwAwA.awmaOl OldwPq-W.WNWO00oww.Pd 0191d ww 01wd 01w.a,........w01OI01N w01W.ww..A.tAww0701.t19....t»a. aw:q O101wdIO.. C'! , 0 in..4 a 4 co Oi N co co V W.V W Pf A.+i;lows.0)A::A 4.W 010140 a a a OT a V..1 w w V a CO CO a s O•T V 011:001 V.Q.A 01 N 00 V V V co a V V_m a O1 A w A W CO a 00 O!in cm 91 V V R! '� y 91 K. l .4 4 4+.4.1.- r+++.r+.r+ua r r 4..4.4+. 4 . 0 0 'i' N N NY N a g A g N+O gg N µU g U U NN t0J NV N N N N NN N N N?4NpNNN N++++ A r+O+rt0 pV Oi g.e n+g Z 0 y VZ44.W W.VO W p D V:0A WN+ X 0 . to z g . .W W . WWW W W W -W W W OwNWW W CO . W N NNNW WW W W W NN HPw w w WW NW W W W W W W W. Ww W Ao To AOAdg0Aw 000. . su .s W + 1 a..01++ r+ +.+ P -c -.s r r 0+g++ +4 a++++ .A+10 at+.a 3 w+r+r Y +++ r 0.W V 44 44 41 d Q W d m d w Y A 44 I/r w 01 w !71 0 n.+ -p +++.� M++ r... OdO NNN.N Nim+ 0+ NNpY+NNN O :N 0000 +.+.N+O ''Y1YYi .RJ ppAP� N . NW W++++W w W W w+ pWg wAEn 6yNo W W14N ug NVyNaTgEg lgUgN49.NV I HN+E NryNLI5Vy14 a H! � O O Q� dwPWN+O N V W V W + m C r, CR to N 0I w w w w N W CR 171 O w 01/r en..w IA O1 cm in a W 1P O1 01 01..w a W On cm 119 W w W W W W w to 01 W Oi w-CM OR an W W w 01 0{a 01 CD O1 CM CM W W wow 01 w.CR_W W CR 01 00 01 OI O 07 cm Q1 44 Q a to 4. awA PAP V OIdHAa W CO CO V CO cm d d is V OD On CO CO 0/�01'to cm W 40 ID O b CO V V VI V AAA s4 CD CD G ID W WI CM ON OR 1 CR CR O j,r:�a A CD CO::i.ri.4 CM cm A A.co cm 0.cat M �1 �1 (0{7 Q� p (1 W �1 (7/1 W (1 y� W (ry f ! pPp b WD G 47 Wp W !O b 112 tp t0 (d0O1 W�/,0,11�g(g p�g V 44 11 V V yW WW1 N V IE Cg aW 041 q OWE 041 qW Wa pW1 IT7 Ww X,71 tE f(f E I�,l1i t�y7p.g�g r(per. L E WA i. g�,W7 W(yam(g�,W1 I,y1 n n�W,1 1U W 1,47 n 16,,E NW a►,,77 1a g °� O a CO V 01 170 A W N+d CP a iic A W N+0 ID CO V O)w A W N+ O iD QO V CI 01 A W.N+(y W fd W 01 01 A lJ N+O 01 t7 V 01 AWN+: !4 Oi V 81 W A/4 N+b i0 �7 01 09 7>6.4 Fi+ m w w=mot w w w w w a 01 w w w.O7 0 0 w OO 01 w W cm CI 01 a 00 01-CI in CnCn w w'IA 01 to 01 0,01 m 171:to W a QI CI 01 w.A w 01.01 44 01 01 d 01 on on N to cm d W O!d.00 01 01 Oi.:01 T d 01.'4.OI 01 071 01 g P•P,J..P W A,a.A'P 0..a.A A A:.A P Oa Co V V p U.0a X71 w a a O.W a 01 0,w 41 01 OJ a w W O a a w d a w w a w n d 01 A 4.d 01:w OI N Ot 171 OI A 01 p O N A a w 191 0 a V° in 91 In V A"f�1t •r Appendix Results of Regression Analysis r a. at,..� x r - J ■ i z. fx� c k �� r Y., ,.,,,, e ,. 0 . ,,. .,...::::-. . .„ Vehicle Tn.s +ter.• " DEP VAR: VTRIPS N: 2421 MULTIPLE R:0.479 SQUARED MULTIPLE R.0.230 "•• ADJUSTED SQUARED MULTIPLE R. . 0228 y AAN •.•STANDARD ERROR OF ESTIMATE: 4.0353468 • �= !Avg.Vthde Tr:xrs 5.501 ,average Pre Veh cIe Trite 5.52 VARIABLE AVERAGE COEFFICIENT STY!ERROR STD COEF TOLERANCE 1-STAT P21AIL) , ;• CONSTANT 0.2574619 0.384439 0.0000000 0.66971 0.50311 HhISIZE 2.54 1.1838663 0.072454 0.321620 0.823744 16.00000 0.00000 AVIiHINC 31009 0.0000223 0.000004 0.101154 0.843883 520145 0.00000 CARS 1.84 03192172 0.098218 0.157976 0.714523 7.47434 0.00000 ., ALOGPEF 1.38 -0.3098400 0.158630 -0.042930 0.660670 -1.95322 0.05091 .�,. TO-020A 371017 13.0000027 0.000001 0.075335 0.570579 3.18534 0.00146 TOT3OT 53233 -0.0000065 0.000002 -0.092347 0.501731 -3.66162 0.0 {, Vehicle Miles Traveled j DEP VAR: VMT N: 2421 MULTIPLE R:0.500 SQUARED MULTIPLE R:0.250 • '• ADJUSTED SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0247 STANDARD ERROR OF ESTIMATE 23.0098858 * { w Aver. e VMT 28.171 Average Predlcxer91LM7' 28710 VARIABLE AVERAGE COEFFICIENT STD ERROR STD COEF TOLERANCE T-STAT P(2TA1L) • " CONSTANT 29.4443808 5.237317 0.000000 5.82242 0.00000 . PEF 7.66 -0.7410791 0.279383 -0.069833 0.449644 -2.65471 0.00799 x 4 HHSIZE 2.54 2.9611576 0.461448 0.139299 0.660298 6.41713 0.00000 AVHHINC 31088.60 0.0001631 0.000025 0.128344 0.818738 6.58373 0.00000 '" OARS 1.84 4.4501197 0.572344 0.169258 0.656575 7.77525 0.00000 ? WORKERS 1.37 2.6241385 0.670007 0.088612 0.607828 3.91659 0.00009 '• 0, AVAGE 38.11 -0.0733091 0.032937 -0.045971 0.729332 -222572 0.02613 . ` LHI-IDEN 0.74 1.7523175 0643215 -0.067668 0.504318 -2.72431 0.00 ' • , . TOT30A 546118 0.0000264 0 -0.062870 - 0.707617 -2.99823 0.00274 ;', -; TOT3OT 53233 -0.0000275 0.000010 -0.067895 0.318382 -2.77161 0.00562 , 00.f- Vehicle Miles Traveled per Person - DEP VAR:VMTPERP N 2397 MULTIPLE R:0.430 SQUARED MULTIPLE P.:0.185 ADJUSTED SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.184 STANDARD ERROR OF ESTIMATE: 10.0189035 A VMT Person 11.851 Ayera9 Pre Scted VMT Der Persara '01.85 r VARIABLE AVERAGE COEFFICIENT STD ERROR STD COEF TOLERANCE I-STAT P 2TAIL) LO • CONSTANT 9.2149001 1.114632 0.000000 8.26721 0.00000 c PEF 7.66 -0.3503725 0.121126 -0.078922 0.453541 -189264 0.00385 AVINCPER 14070 0.0001312 0.000021 0.126348 0.817953 621899 0.00000 CARPERP 0.80 5.0603416 0.505467 0.206408 0.794260 10.00000 0.00000 WPHHRATE 0.58 3.6614455 0.600290 0.118866 0.888993 6.09947 0.00000 ' LHHDEN 0.74 -0.7713278 0.279143 -0.071258 0.507671 -2.76320 0.00577 TO120A 371017 -0.0000040 0.000002 -0.046095 0.536268 -1.87296 0.06119.,.,,. t TOT3OT 53233 -0.0000118 0.000005 -0.069669 0.446814 -2.53449 0,01132 s -1 0. ` 9/10/93 REGRESS.XLS { • • •'f correlation coe cse lm.).bet e°�.v�,�B�T��°i�bies i Ho sehcld b3130 Transit by PEE Density lutes 30 Alanutes • } _ PEF _ 1....00 Household Density .59 1.00 Auto by , 30 fl utes .41 .37 1.00 Transit by 30 Minutes .64 .65 .45 1.00 , ,:, ti Vii„ ss , r' ry 7:-,:...,,,..,''• t , ...6 ° ,.,Y r H c,.'4.;"3 it 111 ':tv a'' ',, `V.r ,S, a „ ,_ , . • kR , MEMORANDUM ... CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO Community Development;:Cod ,(Title 18/TMC) Holders FROM Cathy Wheatley, City Recorder DATE: October 20, 1994 SUBJECT: Update to Community Development Code Attached is the update to Title 18 which covers ordinances 93-28, 94-05, and 7. When updating your Code book, please use the following as a reference; �" Remove Rem ln �h . ` 7r' 87-93 • . . • • • • • • • • - . 8.r7-93 132 • • • • . . • 132 } 184-185 • . . . • • •184-185 1 ':< �7 211 • 211 x 229-255 . 229-255 410-424 • • • . • • . 410-424 426 , . . . 426 • { 428 • . . . . . . . • . . . . . . 428 if you have any questions, please contact me. W cmi b>;login\Jo\title18.mem 4-.1" • • t,. i, k +1•.`>.._ .+. d. .u`+ ..,t 3x. tiw. ..:'k t; ax *'. ; >>` . , Si i• . t .4 r .,,:1 i, R_ A�.._ r.�.� ..•ti:. ?x i.>..,�N. r rY .„, • • 8. Business Equipment Sales and Services % Refers to establishments or places of business primarily engaged in the '' sale, rental, or repair of equipment and supplies used by office, professional and service establishments to the firms themselves rather than to individuals, but excludes automotive, construction, and farm equipment. Typical uses include office equipment and supply firms, • e.e, small business machine repair shops or .'.tel equipment and supply x firms; • ' 9 Business Support Sorv.cess Refers to establishments primarily engaged in the provision of service of a clerical, employment, protective, or minor processing nature to `' . firms rather than individuals, and where the storage of goods other ', than samples is prohibited. Typical uses include secretarial services, telephone answering services, or blueprint services; - x 10. Communications Services; Y ' # Refers to establishments primarily engaged in the provision of broadcasting and other information relay services accomplished through V, , the use of electronic and telephonic mechanisms but excludes those uses : classified as Utilities in this title. Typical uses include television studios, telecommunication service centers, or telegraph service offices; 11. Construction Sales and Services: e'..„..: , e ` Refers to establishments or places of business primarily engaged in 04 . construction activities and incidental storage on lots other than construction sites, as well as the retail or wholesale sale from the ' ' �; premises of materials used in the construction of buildings or other structures, other than retail sale of paint, fixtures, and harc:'ware; ti' but excludes those classified as one of the automotive and Leavy .e equipment use types. T pical uses include building materials stores, "'' tool and equipment rental or sales, and building �; contracting/construction offices; t e .. ., -,e 12. Construction Contractor's Professional Offices: • < Refers to the administrative offices associated with firms who I, regularly engage in professional construction contracting. These �2 offices function primarily as other professional and administrative l ,' offices and are to be distinguished from construction sales and 1. `:; .`r services uses. Construction Contractor's Professional Offices may contain incidental indoor storage to accommodate various building f materials and equipment related to the firm's construction business. However, no outdoor storage of heavy vehicles, equipment or construction materials shall be permitted; , 13. Consumer Repair Services: le Refers eo establishments primarily engaged in the provision of repair services to individuals and households rather than firms, but excluding ' automotive and equipment use types. Typical uses include appliance repair shops, apparel repair firms, musical instrument repair firms, •,, and shoe repair shops; .d R, i ' V fi ii ee Pae8? ._ , Revised 10/12/93 g .1., ,�:'+ ', t iy}+r , a.?.1 u. t .i. ... .1 .. . . 4:; 14. Convenience Sales and Personal Services: ,;: . Refers to small, neighborhood oriented retail businesses which pr,vide i` � 0 for the daily needs of nearby residents. It includes uses which are intended for neighborhood grocery stores, drugstores, laundromai:s, cleaners, barber shops, and beauty salons, y 15. Eating and Drinking Establishments . ' .. Refers to establishments or places of business primarily engaged in the sale of prepared food and beverages for on-premises consumption. Typical uses include fast order food establishments with and without ` . drive-up facilities and sit-down eating establishments, taverns, bars, i and lounges; ` i. w . 16. E:,cplosive Storage {r:.-' , Refers to the storage of any quantity of explosives in accordance with ' ORS Chapter 480. Typical uses include storage in the course of ,- manufacturing, selling or transporting explosives, or in the course of - blasting operations; e 17. Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services: Refers to establishments primarily engages in the provision of -- 1' :? , financial, insurance, real estate, or securities brokerage services. . ., Typical uses include banks, savings and loans, insurance agencies, or t•. real estate firms; °• ,L 18. Food and Beverage Retail Sales: 1k1 .• ; Refers to establishments or places of business primarily engaged in the a- , -,, ..... .,-,-, retail sale of food and beverages for home consuxption. Typical uses include groceries, delicatessens, or liquor stores, and exccluc es eating and drinking establishments; 19. Funeral and Interment Se3rvices: ' c Refers to establishments primar ly engaged inthe provision of services involvin the care, preparation or dis sition of human dead. The x4 g � following are funeral a;.d internment services use types: '.' ;; a. Funeral and Internment Services: Cremating: t1, .•`- Crematory services involving the purification and reduction of the human body by fire. Typical uses include crematories or crematoriums; tD , co '' , ; 1 Revised 10/12/93 -Page 88 i1 a .,• ..„ '...1,. rh., .. .. , .. ,,, to-.. a . ° i - 4 ..t 4: J.. 4, 0 ,. .•. 4. .a r% ,q. b Funeral and Internment Service: Interning:4110 Interning services involving the keeping of human bodies other than in cemeteries. Typical uses include columbariums or mausoleums; „;')-)1 c. Funeral and Internment Services: Undertaking:Undertaking services such as preparing the dead for burial and arranging and managing funerals. Typical uses include funeral homes or mortuaries; d. Funeral and Internment Services: Cemeteries: Cemeteries. 20. General Retail Sales: ,a. _,. Refers to the sale or rental of commonly used goods and merchandise for ,14.. personal or household use, but excludes those classified as agricultural sales, animal sales and services, automotive and equipment, business equipment sales and services, construction sales ,, and services, food and beverage retail sales, and vehicle fuel sales. Typical uses include department stores, apparel stores, furniture stores, pet stores, or bookstores; a: 21. Laundry Services Refers to establishments primarily engaged in the provision of +3' laundering, dry cleaning, or dyeing services other than those classified as convenience sales and personal services, general Noir Typical uses include commercial laundry agencies, diaper services, or linen supply services, but excluding laundrounats and dry cleaners; 22. Medical and Dental Services Refers to establishments primarily engaged ill the provision of personal • r, health services ranging from prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, or rehabilitation services provided by physicians, dentists, nurses, and .' other health personnel as well as the provision of medical testing and analysis services, but excludes those classified as any civic use or group residential/group care use types. Typical uses include medical offices, eye care offices, dental offices, and laboratories, or health maintenance organizations; it i) r Revised 10/12/93 Page 89 } 1.4 k�� � .x � - i•2:'1":"•':',, S; �„ �. 4:t r . ,.. 23. Participant Sports and Recreation: ' 411 Refers to establishments or places primarily engaged in the provision ,s,: of sports or recreation by and for participants. Any spectators would f ` ',.,,f-,.,. be incidental and on a nonrecurring basis. The following are ;;' -"..1 participant sports and recreation use types: is "` a. Participant Sports and Recreation: Indoor: Those uses conducted totally within an enclosed building ''. ,;, Typical uses include indoor tennis courts, racketball courts, ? swimming pools, or physical fitness centers; and ,: a - - --'4'.,' b.b. participant Sports and Recreation: Outdoor: ,' Those uses conducted in open facilities. Typical uses include driving ranges, miniature golf courses, tennis courts, or '',', swimming pools; a ; ; 24. Personal Service Facilities: - Refers to establishments primarily engaged in the provision of r informational, instructional, personal improvement, and similar ,, �7 morvices of a nonprofessional nature but excludes services classified { V; under spectator sports and entertainment facilities, participant ��: t sports, and recreation or transient lodging. Typical uses include photography studios, driving schools, and trade schools, or reducing '..` x salons; 25. Professional and Administrative Services. if ;- r 5 Refers to offices of private firms or organizations which are primarily = ,, used for the provision of professional, executive management, or t , administrative offices, legal offices, architectural, or engineering firms; va,. ' 26. Research Services; A j Refers to establishments primarily engaged in research of an industrial or scientific nature which is generally 'provided as a service or which . is conducted by and for a private firm, but excludes medical testing ?` a ' .' and analysis. typical uses include electronics research laboratories, "-' environmental research and development firms, or pharmaceutical ,; research labs; i, 0? 7 ' ,, \j ,, Revised 10/12/93 page 90 t ti 27. Scrap Operations: . : a. Salvage: C Refers to places of business primarily' engaged in the storage, s sale, dismantling, or other processing of used, source separated, or waste materials which are,not intended for reuse y, in their original form. Typical uses include automotive wrecking yards, junk yards, or paper salvage yards; and b. Recycling Collection Center: , , ,,, Refers to facilities where glass, cans, and papers or other '`y materials are collected for the purpose of being transferred to ." a paper salvage of recycling facility; 28. Spectator Sports and Entertainment Facilities:: j Refers to establishments or places primarily engaged in the provision of cultural, entertainment, athletic, and other events to spectators. r Typical uses include convention centers an sport stadiums; 29. Transient Lodging: r Refers to establishments primarily engaged in the provision of lodging services on a temporary basis with incidental food, drink, and other '-'+ sales and services intended for the convenience of guests.. Typical ,, r' uses include hotels, motels, or bed and breakfast houses; 3i 30. Vehicle Fuel Sales: Refers to establishments or places of business primarily- engaged in the 4.!. „ retial sale from the premises of petroleum products with incidental sale of tires, batteries, and replacement items, lubricating services, and minor repair services. Typical uses include automobile service ' stations, filling stations, or truck stops, D. Industrial Use Types: :;:l., ---1'-'::: , ie Industrial use types include the on-site production of goods by methods not ''' commercial, agricultural, or extractive in nature: .` 1. Light Industrial: • a. Manufacturing of Finished Products: s O. The manufacture of finished products from previously prepared � material (excluding raw materials) ; 1 4. Or :'-'?4., .. ': e "; 11 f' d, : e 5 d1. ` r Revised 10/12/93 Page 91 A , r• , ',. b. Packaging and Processing: (i) Refers to the production, processing, assembling, °; packaging, , or treatment of products from previously processed materials; or (ii) Production, processing, assembling, and packaging of s: finished Products from previously prepared materials. n ; � c. Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution: Refers to establishments or places of business primarily engaged in wholesaling, storage, distribution, and handling of materials and equipment other than live animals and plants. The following 3 = are wholesaling, storage, and distribution use types: (i) Wholesaling, Storage, and Distribution: Miniwarehouses: Storage and warehousing service within a building(s) primarily for individuals to store personal effects and 4,. r'. businesses to store materials for, operation of an : industrial or commercial enterprise located elsewhere: .� . (a) Incidental uses in a miniwarehouse may include the ts. repair and maintenance of stored materials by the tenant, but in no case may storage spaces in a miniwarehouse facility function as an independent retail, wholesale, business, or service use; and (b) Spaces shall not be used for workshops, hobbyshops, manufacturing, or similar uses and human occupancy of the space is limited to that required to transport, •,.: arrange, and maintain stored materials;' • (ii) Wholesaling, Storage, and Distribution: Light: Wholesaling, storage, and warehousing services within enclosed structures. Typical uses include wholesale distributors, storage warehouses, or roving and storage F v r:, firms; 2. Heavy Industrial: J } a. Manufacturing of Finished Products: Refers to the manufacturing, processing, or assembling of '. t:` semifinished or finished products from raw materials; Cat 861 3f s LL, Revised 10/12/93 gage •�2•l ti .Fa; Y Y, � y , 4 h.�+iR'. L, :4 x '\ .a .4 r. b. Wholesaling, Storage, and Distribution: Heavy: 4110 Refers to open-air storage, distribution and handling materials and equipment. Typical uses include monument or stone Yards, or ;' . grain elevators. (Ord. 93-28; Ord. 91-30; Ord. 89-06; Ord. 85- 39 Ord. 85-22 Ord 85-15; Ord. 84-29; Ord. 83-52) • • • • • 1i, 77 4•, Revised 10/12/93 Page 93 } 1. Research services; and m. The following uses, separately or in combination, shall not '': exceed a total of 20 percent of the entire square footage within. " the development complex: q (i) Convenience sales and personal services; . . ' ... (ii) Cat',ng and drinking establishments; and a (iii) Retail sales, general; 3. Residential use types: '` ' '.i' a. Multiple-family residential units as a mixed use in conjunction, . developed at R-40+ standards, with a commercial development, only iwthe CP District within the Tigard Triangle and the Bull Mountain Road District, on or above the second floor of the sstructure; b. Home occupations subject to provisions of Chapter 18.142, c. Family day care; . 4. Transient lodging/restaurant (on the same parcel) 5. Temporary use; 6 Fuel tank; or 4:; . . 7. Accessory structures. (Ord. 90-41; Ord. 89-06; Ord. 86-08; Ord._85-32; Ord. 84-73; Ord. 84-29; Ord. 83-52) g.64.040 Conditional Uses (See Chapter 18.130) f A. Conditional uses in the C-P district are as follows: . , 1. Heliports, in accordance with the Aeronautics Division (ODOT) and FAA `• . 2. Hospitals; i'4-:''''... '_' 3. Utilities; 4. Religious Assemblies and d � ' s` 5. Construction Contractor's Professional Offices. (Ord. 93.28; Ord. 92- 15; Ord. 39-06; Ord. 85-32; Ord. 84-29; Ord. 83-52) So 18.64.050 Dimensional Renyuirements A. Dimensional requirements in the C-P district are as follows: 1. The minimum lot area shall be 6,000 square feet; 2. The average minimum lot width shall be 50 feet; J 3. Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18.96 and Section 18.100.130, .' the minimum setback requirements are as follows: '0 a. There shall be no minimum front yard setback requirement; A however, conditions in Chapters 18.100 and 18.102 must be met; {'+ ' x ' Revised 10/12/93 Page 132 t . ., . J.. w r :3', ' Y S e , r .� , . �?14 f'..,:: f . .: z .x_14 e.�. 1 'µ` ! ` . ii plumbing, and air-conditioning equipment and � ;���''. E. Electrical, heating, ventilation, .,, ,,, other service facilities shall be designed and/or otherwise elevated or located so , ' , as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during , )'..,f conditions of flooding. ', : 2• All new and replacement water supply systems shall be designed to minimize or } ': eliminate infiltration of floodwaters into the system in accordance with the r r' Uniform Building Coda and Uniform Plumbing Code. , " F. All new construction, all manufactured homes and substantial improvements-shall be ' , . `; anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of the structure. `' ', G. New and replacement sanitary sewerage systems shell be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of floodwaters into the systems and discharge from the systems into floodwaters. 'i,, y" H. On-site water disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to them or ' ' contamination from them during flooding. A. j :: ' I. Residential Construction 'r , 1. New construction and substantial improvement of any residential structure, other than a manufactured home, shall have the lowest floor, including the ,`,: t::`3a basement, elevated at least one foot above base flood elevation; and e. �� ' 2. Fully enclosed areas below the lowest floor that are subject to flooding are ,, - prohibited, or shall be designed to automatically equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls by allowing for the entry and exit of floodwaters. 3��' Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered r: u^ professional engineer or architect, or must meet or exceed the following minima criteria r A i a. A minimum of two openings having a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding 1 i shall he provided; '' ' ' a ;' b. The bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above ',;. grade; and f-,O' .' '. ' .. c. Openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, or other coverings or e' ! r devices, provided that they permit the automatic entry and exit of 2- ' flood waters. J. Nonresidential Construction art. ,' • F !, g . it - {; .4 EMI 1. i'' !f i :. _ f„ ,, is ' Revised 03/08/94 page 184 fly x,, ..... 1. New construction and substantial improvement of any commercial, industrial, ee or other nonresidential structure shall either have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to the level of the base flood elevation, or tx together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities, shall: a Be floodproofed so that below the base flood level the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water; b. Nave structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy; *L_':', c. Be certified a registered engineer by g' professional en or architect that the design and methods of construction are in accordance with accepted standards of practice for meeting provisions of this subsection based ee on their development and/or review of the structural design, specifications and plans. Such certifications shall be provided to the Building Official as set forth in Subsection 18.84.025.B, and d. Nonresidential structures that are elevated, not floodproefed, must � } meet the same standards for space below the lowest floor as described :'• in 18.84.026.1.2.. Applicants floodproofing nonresidential buildings shall be notified that flood insurance premiums will be based on rates that are one foot below the floodproofed level (e.g., a building constructed to the base flood level will be rated as one foot below �fN that level). (Ord. 94-OS; Ord. 89-06 Ord. 87-66, Ord. 87-32) n 18.84.028 General Provisions for Wetlands A. wetland regulations apply to those areas meeting the definition of wetland in Chapter 18.26 of the Community Development Code, areas meeting Division of State Lands wetland criteria and to land adjacent to and within 25 feet of a wetland. Wetland locations may include but are not limited to those areas identified as wetlands in °Wetland Inventory and Assessment for the City of Tigard, Oregon, ° ` Scientific Resources Incorporated, 1990. B. Precise boundaries may vary from those shown on wetland maps; specific delineation of wetland boundaries may be necessary. Wetland delineation will be done by, qualified professionals at the applicant's expense. (Ord. 90-29) `:i ' 18.84.030 Expiration of Ap�aroval: Standards for Extension of Time A. Approval of a sensitive lands permit shall be void if 1. Substantial construction of the approved plan has not begun within a one-and- =s one-half year period; or 2. Construction on the site is a departure from the approved plan. > B. The Director shall, upon written request by the applicant and payment of the required fee, grant an extension of the approval period not to exceed one year, • provided that: { 1.0 1. No changes are made on the original plan as approved by the approval authority; • ' Revised 03/08/94 Page 185 a��t �:` tN�:;r t � � 1 r x ; -i • 1 1 ' B• i.Y'�. f.. '^,• i Y a wS r l S. 1 } Chagter 18.98 °`, BUILDING HEIGh T LIMITATIONS;: EXCEPTIONS ctions• -,. 18.98.010 Projections Not Used for Human Habitation 18.98.020 Building Height Exceptions •' ,, • = 18.98.030 Building Heights and Flag Lots r 18.98.010 Proiections Not Used for Human Habitation A. Projections such as chimneys, spires, domes, elevator shaft housings, towers excluding Tv dish receivers, aerials, flag poles, and other similar objects not used for human occupancy, are not subject to the building height limitations of this title- (Ord. 89-06: Ord. 83-52) , J 18.98.020 Building Height Exceptions : A. Any building located in a nonresidential zone may be built to a maximum height of 75 feet: Provided: 1, The total floor area of the building does not exceed 1-1/2 the area of the site; 2. The structure is not within 75 feet of a building lot within a residential zoning district. (Ord. 94-07 Ord. 89-06; Ord- 83-52) 18.98.030 Building Heights and Flag Lots z '^ A. Limitations on the placement of residential structures on flag lots apply when any of the following exist: ,, Ammt 1. A flag lot was created prior to April 15, 1985; 2 A flag lot is created after April 15, 1985 by an approved minor land .> partition; or 3 A flag lot is created by the approval of a 'subdivision and the flag lot is located on the periphery of the subdivision so that the lot adjoins other residentially zoned land, • q 5 `fl+✓19 i. Revised 04/26/94 Page 211 • •t .E i!` t 1: • • 3_r 1 • . P Y!. x �, J 8. 1,1 .,-..,;:ii.,, : Chapter 1$.106' t .2 `., OFF-STREET P4k2KIng M D LOADI_G OU!Rr�3SN'TS iI °'ctions: 18.106.010 Purpose ; i, 18.106.015 Applicability of Provisions 18:106.,'020 General Provisions 4" 18.106.030 Minimum Off-Street. Parking Requirements � 18.106.040. Modification to Parking Requirements 18.106.050 Parking Dimension Standards 18.106.060 On-Site Vehicle Stacking Areas Required for Drive-In Use , n 18.106.070 Loading/Unloading Driveways Required On-Site 18.106.080 Off-Street Loading Spaces ' . 18.106.090 Off-Street Loading Dimensions 18:106.010 Furt�ose A. The purpose of these regulations is, to establish parking areas having ' ' adequate capacity and which are appropriately located and designed to minimize any hazardous conditions on-site and at access, points. B. The parking requirements are intended to provide sufficient parking in close .., proximity to the various uses for residents, customers, and employees, and ` j :` to establish standards which will maintain the traffic carrying capacity of ' 4 nearby streets. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) ' ,y% 18106015 :Apoli cab lily of Provisions ?',a ;, A. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the -'` construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures (see =' Section 18.120.020) and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. . g quirements. i. } ;- {T° A DEQ Indirect Source Construction Permit may be required for parking :IC', °- facilities having 250 or more parking spaces. 1 B. Where the ., provisions of Chapter 18.120, Site Development Review,. . do not ,, apply, the Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a plan i.4 r submitted under the provisions of this chapter. No notice is required. The decision may be appealed "' t.,:, . y ppealed as provided by Subsection 18.32.?10.A. ' ', '' C. J The applicant shall submit a site Plan which includes: i , lyY5 , 1. The location of the structures on the property and on the adjoining . ,' property; ., O~ 4 2. The delineation ©f individual parking and loading spaces and their■ } t0) dimensions; ,-,:::.4 4:,,,,..:,'4.q't., 0 , j. s { ti yam..+ S p } t . . Revised 04/26/94 Page 229 4 .t -'ti .1 .aY ., y �" 4. , :1:A - _ 1 '' ; y ,'''' 5y to qa„ arty i r. a x, 3. The location of the circulation area necessary to serve the spaces;' : 4. The location of the access point(s) to streets, to _accessways_ and to �r properties to be served; ;.` ' ,. is s The location of curb cuts; zg : 6. The location and dimensions of all landscaping, including the type and "' size of plant material to be used, as well as any other landscape ::r i't...„.:, ,v material incorporated into the overall plan; 7. The proposed grading and drainage plans.; and :,,4":',•'..: 8. Specifications as to signs and bumper guards. (Ord. 94-07; Ord. 89-06; - •, , Ord. 84-24; Ord. 83-52) i .,2:,.1% 18.106.020 General Provisions !,` A. Parking Dimensions a ' 1. The minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: ., z a. Eight feet eight inches wide and 18 feet long for a standard space; ' b. Eight feet wide and 15 feet long for a compact space, and - a As required by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards ,' `' for designated disabled g person parking spaces.. , ,, , s B. Building Permit Conditions ., . ..- 0 1. •The provision and •maintenance of off-street parking and loading spaces a are the continuing obligations of the property owner: . L Y „ a. No building or other permit shall be issued until plans are A Presented to the Director to show that property is and will remain ( available for exclusive use as off-street parking and loading 2..,i,'„ ti space; and t�'`:„." b. The subsequent use of property for which the buildin g Permit is ' issued shall be conditional upon the unqualified continuance and , ' availability of the amount of parking and loading space required by this title. ,` . Y i .' ej f. I. i 1, : Revised 04/26/94 Page 230 r 5 � , t tk.' ,.._.. x y ..a 3 ., a '0..r, - '�r Y q,'! �t -. +.'� , , i ^.I - -`.k y, y , i ( ,,� , .a,:... • • Parkin C. : .; Parking Requirements for Unlisted Uses 1. Upon application and payment of fees, the Director, as provided by ' +r: Subsection 18.32.090.A, may rule that a use, net specifically listed in Section 18.106.030, is a use similar to a listed use and that the same parking standards shall apply No notice need be given.. The decision may be appealed as provided by Subsection 18.32.310.A. The ruling on parking area requirements shall be based on findings that the s following criteria are satisfied: a. The use is similar to and of the same general type as a listed use, _ b. The use has similar intensity, density, and off-site impact as the listed use; and c. The use has similar impacts on the community facilities as the listed use; 2. This section does not authorize the inclusion of a use in a zoning district where it is not listed, or a use which is specifically listed in another zone or which is of the`seme general type and is similar to r a use specifically listed in another zoning district; and } 30 The Director shall maintain a list of approved unlisted use parking '`. : requirements which shall have the same effect as an amendment to this } a chapter. D. Existing and New Uses 1. At the time of erection of a new structure or at the time of Aglik enlargement or change in use of an existing structure within any district, off-street parking spaces shall be as provided in accordance with Section 18:106.030; and a. Tn case of enlargement of a building or use of land existing on the date of adoption of this title, the number of parking and loading spaces required shall be based only on floor area or capacity of such enlargement; and is b. If parking space has been provided in connection with an existing use or is added to an existing use, the parking space shall not be eliminated if the elimination would result in less space than is ;.; specified in the standards of this section when applied to the entire use. .lag Revised 04/26/94 page 231 ,t F. ` Change in Use 1. When an existing structure is changed in use from one use to another use as listed in Section 18.10..030, and the parking requirements for each use are the same, no additional Parking shall be required: and 2. Where a change in use results in an intensification of use in terms of the number of parking spaces required, additional parking spaces shall x- `, be provided in an amount equal to the difference between the number of ie spaces required for the existing use and the number of spaces required for the more intensive use ' F. Shared Parking in Commercial Districts • 1. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak `., hours of operation do not overlap: 2. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director` in the 1 e,:: form of deeds, leases, or contracts to establish the joint use; and` 3. If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses !e change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. G. Visitor Parking in multiple-Family Residential Districts 1. Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide parking for the use of guests of residents of the complex, and' er't ' 2. visitor parking shall consist of 15 percent of the total required parking spaces and shall be centrally located within or evenly . distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. ! .± H. Location of Required Parking 1. Off-street p arkin g spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling; and 9 2. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located net further than than 200 feet from the building or use they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following ti exceptions: a. Shared parking areas, as provided by Subsection 18.106.020.F for Z commercial uses which require more than 40 `. �: PJ3 parking spaces may , . „: >m provide for the spaces in excess of the required 40 spaces up to ` ' a distance of 300 feet from the commercial building or use, and (9 M1 34 Revised 04/26/94 Page 232 d a b. Industrial and manufacturing uses which require in excess of 40 , spaces may locate the required spaces in excess of the 40 spaces, f 4 ,,, up to a distance of 300 feet from the ;building. ,:. I. Mixed Uses , y < 1. Where several uses occupy a single structure or parcel of land or a , `: combination of uses are included in one business, the total off-street -.",:'14:4: -r, parking spaces and loading area is the sum of the requirements of the several uses, computed separately unless the peak hours of use do not 4. overlap. J: Choice of Parking Requirements 1. When a building or use is planned or constructed in such a manner that. a choice of parking requirements would be made, the use which requires`. the greater number of; parking spaces shall govern. '; '- K. Availability of Parking Spaces ';' 1. Required parking spaces shall: ,, a. Be available for the parking of operable passenger automobiles of tin,'• residents, customers, patrons, and employees only, b. Not be used for storage of vehicles or materials or for the parkin; of trucks used in conducting the business or use; and - c. Not be rented, leased, or assigned to any other person or a; l'.'''',• organization. - L. Parking Lot Landscaping % V. r ,. 1. Parking lots` shall be landscaped in accordance with the requirements ., in Chapter 18.100. } , e< 4 y$Revised 04/26/94 page 233 e 23 t = M 0 0 .- M. Designated Parking for the Handicapped {: 1. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall ef ' ' be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. N. Designated Parking for Compact Vehicles .. t ... 1. All parking spaces designated for compact vehicles shall be signed or ' 4 - - labeled by painting on the parking space. r-' 0 Bicycle Parking ..,. ti 1_ At least one lockable bicycle parking space shall be provided within e. a rack for every 15 required parking spaces (or portion thereof) in any ~ 1= development, unless otherwise specified by this Code. The Director may -' '' reduce the number of required bicycle parking spaces on a case-by-.case basis if the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed use its nature would be reasonably anticipated to generate a lesser need for bicycle = 4. 4 parking. Single-family residences and duplexes are excluded from the °„ bicycle parking requirements. 1.. . < ' 2. Bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of , ., primary entrances to structures. Where possible, bicycle parking facilities shall be placed under cover. Bicycle parking areas shall ; not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian $ ways: tt Y 1 P. Lighting ,';; , 1. Any lights provided to illuminate any public or private parking area e. or vehicle sales area shall be so arranged as to direct the light away from any adjacent residential district. j ' Q. Final Building Inspection • v 1. Required parkin g spaces s shall be completely p_etely improved to City standards X tl. and available for use at the time of the final building inspection.' R. Plan Building Permit Prerequisite - L ,:et 1. A plan drawn to scale, indicating how the off-street parking and 4` loading requirement is to be fulfilled, shall accompany the request for a building permit or site development review permit in accordance with .. 0l Subsection 18.120.180.A.12. S. Measurement for Required Parking 1. Unless otherwise specified, where square feet are specified, the area measured shall be gross floor area under the roof measured from the faces of the structure, excluding only space devoted to covered off- `} U • street parking or loading. e. 4. . ,..-:::';,. . 0 , rJ • t } Revised 04/26/94 Page 234 Y,I 3 ' '� .i? , -•;. X ;. t-. r ,y' YlY a.'.�t ,tai a.' 7y :,. p{ . T. Employees 1. Where employees are specified, the employees counted are the persons .t. who work on the premises including proprietors, executives, professional people, production, sales, and distribution employees during the largest shift at peak season. l U. Fractions 'IIIr-;. _ S 1. Fractional space requirements' shall be counted as a whole space. v. On-Street Parking k 1. Parking spaces in the public street or alley shall not be eligible as 1r;"' j fulfilling any part of the parking requirement. = ,' W. Preferential Long Term Carpool/Vanpool Parking t a.- 4 ', 1. Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long term parking spaces shall provide preferential long term carpool and vanpool parking for '' employees, students, other regular visitors to the site. At least 5 percent of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for , carpool/vanpool use Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall '' .-„=".',` be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee 4` or student parking, other than disabled person parking spaces. , Preferential carpool/vanpool parking spaces shall be full size parking spaces. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall ' be clearly designated for use only by carpools or vanpools between 7:00 A.M. and 5:30 P.M. (Ord. 94-07, Ord. 92-16; Ord. 89-06 Ord. 84-29 Ord. 83-52) r ? .106.030 Minimum Off-Street Parkins Recruirements Note: some use classifications 4 ° t sted below indicate additional bicycle parking requirements beyond the requirements '. of Code Section 18.106.020.P. A. Residential Uses a, 1. Single-family residences 2 off-street spaces for each dwelling ' } (attached or detached) unit y 2. Two-family residences Same as single-family , y 3. Multiple dwelling Also see Subsection 18.106.020.E a. Studio 1. space for each unit ^ b. 1 bedroom units 1.5 spaces for each unit CO t' c. More than 1 bedrooms 2 spaces for each unit ° per unit 4. Group residential 1 space for each ?� p P guest room .". plus 1 space for each employee 5, G;.oup care residential 1 space per 3 beds plus 1 4 space for each employee as 4•v ;♦'_0 ^,,, :, Revised 04/26/94 P.aage 235 i �•, . .. .., ^ P . ‘C 4 y E z� P"i+ i h "� 4 Y 4 • 4 ''),-''',4't • x Z y s i .. S. Civic Uses { .;• l.f 1. Community recreation As required by facilities .1, provided ;;; 2. Cultural exhibits and 1 space per 400 square feet , . , library services of gross floor area, 1.5 bicycle spaces per 1000 sq. ft. 3. Children's day care 5 spaces plus 1 space per classroom i 4. Hospitals 1-1/2 spaces per bed " ^; 5. Lodge, fraternal, and 1 space for every 4 fixed • ,.' civic assembly seats or every 8 feet of bench length 4 or 1 space for every 100 square feet of floor area in the assembly area if - there are no fixed seats 6. Public agency 1 space for every 350 square ;. administrative feet of gross floor area -' Service . 1 7. Public safety services 1 space for every employee of the • :t'. largest shift x 8. Religious assembly 1 space for every 3 fixed seats or • { -" every 6 feet of bench length in the ' assembly area or every 50 square feet i:i of floor apace in the assembly area 0 where there are no permanent seats, 4 whichever is greater • '' 9. Schools . i # a. Preschool/ 5 spaces plus 1 space per y' ' kindergarten classroom , �* b. Elementary, junior 1.5 spaces for every employee, ' high school or plus 1 space for each 100 equivalent private square feet of floor area in or parochial school the auditorium or other assembly or'1 space for each 8 seats, whichever is • 1.: .a greater; 2 bicycle spaces per classroom A; c. Senior high and 1.5 spaces for each employee, �,. equivalent private plus 1 space for every 6' or parochial school classroom seats, and 1 space for each ;r 100 square feet of floor area or 1 space for each 8 seats in the auditorium or other assembly room, whichever is greater; 6 bicycle •, spaces per classroom -';',.•, -.,, ".. 0 . 'k Revised 04/26/94 Page 236: -Y= • . ... v . - , x 5= ,7t k.:. .�. .. .,,. , +. .i.1r+, ,i'e ,k ,n a, 3.. . . .P A• .. n. .1 ^'L , 1,. < .. r r• F ' ? t• J J a - �r , i d« Commuter-type 1 space for every full-time college equivalent atudent; 4 bicycle spaces • per classroom e. Resident-type 1 space for every 3 full-time yr' college equivalent students; 1 bicycle space for every . 4 full-time equivalent lt� students. f. Commercial or business I space for every full-time t4 school equivalent student ': 4 bicycle spaces per classroom C. Commercial Uses + 1. Administrative and 1 space for each 350 square Professional services feet of gross floor space 2. Adult entertainment 1 space for each 400 square feet of 6' gross floor area if bookstore, and 1 space Per 2 seats if theater $ `* ; 3. Agricultural sales 1 space per 400 square feet of gross floor area, but not less than 4 spaces, for each establishment 4. ' Agricultural services 1 space per 400 square feet of gross floor area, but not. less than 4 • t . ; spaces for each establishment S. Amusement enterprises 1 space per 300 square feet of gross f y floor area, plus l' space for every 2 employees, or 1 space per 3 seats if s' theater ;= E Animal sales and services a. Auction 1 space per S0 square feet of gross F; floor area b. Grooming 1 space per 400 square feet of gross floor area c. Kennels 1 space per employee O. d. Veterinary 1 space per 300 square feet of gross floor area 7. Automotive and equipment at ti a. Cleaning 1 space per 500 square feet of gross Wfloor area F M4 Revised 04/26/94 Page 237 >, -,. �.., e z�, _ 1 u s�� S x t ,x J,, vt{ f •?r ya ,c3 r i t o ; w 8 v x?� Li!I -• if• t b. Fleet storage 1 space per each employee on the largest shift or 1 space per 1500 , square feet, whichever is larger c,. Repairs; heavy 1 space per 500 square feet equipment of , less than gross 3 spaces floor foc eacareah but establishmennot t , ': W1' d. Repairs: light 1 space per 50 '9 square feet : equipment of gross floor area, but not less'than 3 spaces for each establishment e. Sales: rental: 1 space per 1,000 square feet K farm equipment of gross floor, area, but not less a than 4 spaces for each establishment f. Sales: rental: 1 space per 1,000 square feet heavy equipment of gross floor area, but not less than 4 spaces for each establishment ; g. Sales: 1 space per 1,000 square feet :::::::::,,.. • rentals: light equipment of gross floor area, but not less than 4 spaces for each establishment s x h. storage: 1 space for each employee on nonoperating vehicles largest shift Storage: Recreational 1 space for each employee on 5 �' vehicles and boats largest shift 8. Building maintenance service 1 space for each 500 squa'�,:4 feet of gross floor area, but not less than 3, ; spaces for each establishment 9. Business equipment sales 1 space per 350 square feet n' ' a and service of gross floor area ,,. 10. Business support services 1 space per 350 square feet of gross ':; + floor area ' 11. Communication services 1 space per 350 square feet of gross . ._. <.• floor area 12. Construction sales and 1 space per 1,000 square feet services of gross floor area '4 13. Consumer repair 1 space per 500 square feet services of gross floor area ,, tldd6���e�i--'ppppdaafa t, - •'. ti L!. ` , w • Page 238 Revised 04/26/94 , , 4/26/94 r 1n 1 ?� 14. Con•�enience sales and 1 space per 400 square feet per3onal service of gross floor area, but not less 4110 than 4 spaces per each establishment 15. Eating and drinking 1 space per 50 square feet of establishments dining area plus 1 space for every 2 employees y e m on the , ployee ' 16. Explosive storage 1 space for ever largest or space shift 1 ace for each 1,500 square feet, whichever is larger 17. Financial, insurance 1 space per 350 square feet and real estate of gross floor area 18,. Food and beverage 1 space per 200 square feet retail sales of gross floor area, plus I space for every 2 employees 19. Funeral and internment services { a. Crematory and under- 1 space per each 4 seats or 8 taking feet of bench length, or 1 space } . per 60 square feet where there ; are no fixed seats b. Interning and Exempt cemeteries ' 20. General retail 1 space for each 400 square sales feet of gross floor area, but not less than 4 spaces for each establishment 21. Laundry service 1 space per 500 square feet of gross floor area, but not less than ;3 spaces for each establishment 22. Medical and dental service 1 space per 200 square feet of gross X a A` floor area 23. Participant sports and recreation EE sr- ace per a. Indoor 1 s 300 square feet of gross p p 00 floor area b. Outdoor 1 space per 100 square feet, plus 1 in space for every 2 employees ti ti�tc Revised 04/26/94 Page 239 a, 41) " + y.,,, °. 0 ,- , y• �f 24. Personal service 1 space per 500 square feet :. , ,a,z facilities of gross floor area .i ~" 25. Research services 1 space for each ;employee on the .. largest shift or l space per 500 :..,,,... ,t= square feet, whichever is larger, ., ° k 4 t �' , 26. Retail sales: 1 space for each 1000 square j f. bulky merchandise; feet of gross floor area but ` i.e., furniture, appliances not less than 10 spaces for each {,Y ,� ;: - establishment , 27. Scrap operations and 1 space per each employee, 4, recycling center establishment than 5 spaces for each a; ent e',. 28. Spectator sports and 1 space per 3 seats or 6 • . +- entertainment feet of bench length 29. Transient lodging 1 space for each room plus 1 space , , and associated uses for each 2 employees ' ,'^:2,,,; restaurant/lounge 1 space per 100 sq. ft of seating .. ?, f:. area • •Jy - banquet/meeting rooms 1 space per 200 sq. ft. of seating ,.. area ka '' D. Industrial Uses '' 1. Manufacturing, 1 space per employee of the , ., e,` " production, processing largest shift r + .e il ' ' and assembling ‘4?`::." 2. Wholesaling, storage 1 space for each 1,000 square feet ,°1.4',44,f,,'-., and distribution of gross flocs area within 'warehouse ^.:', (plus 1 space per 700 square feet of yr patron serring area and 1 space per ' 200 square feet of office area) e.:1- 3 Mini warehouse 1 space for every 00 square feet of x �;,f gross office floor area, plus 2 spaces ig, { ; for a caretaker residence. =1.' �el";; 2. Group Care Residential Facilities, Group Residential and Residential ,;.> Homes • as The approval authority may, upon request, allow a reduction in the number of required off-street parkins spaces in housing ;. ,.; developments for elderly or handicapped persons. if such reduction is deemed appropriate after analysis of the size and location of the development, resident auto ownership, number of employees, possible future conversion to other residential uses. Notice of the decision shall be given as provided by section 18.32.120 and t = 1 the decision may be appealed as provided by Subsection 18.32.310,A, • =x :. } 3. Central Business District •,., This section reserved 4. Parking Reduction near Transit Facilities a. Incorporation of transit related facilities such as bus stops and pull outs, bus shelters, park and ride stations, transit oriented =, development<or other transit related facilities into the site development shall be eligible for up to 20 percent reduction in the number of required parking spaces based on the applicant's ' ;= documentation of operational characteristics indicating the number R' of transit users or the number of non-auto users for a particular t` ', facility. 5 Conversion of Existing Required Parking for Transit Supportive Facilities a. Purpose. This allowance is intended to promote the development of transit supportive facilities including bus stops, pullouts, and shelters through the conversion of existing parking facilities. Transit supportive facilities are intended to make the use of transit by customers, employees, or other visitors a more - convenient and pleasant experience. b. Applicability. T" w , • pp y. minas allowance. applies to all where a minimum -.. amount of parking is required and where the site is located .y ,s: adjacent to a street with existing or planned transit service. c. Up to 10 percent of existing required parking spaces may be converted at a ratio of one parking space for each 100 square feet r. D6 of transit facility. P" d. Required elements: i. A transit facility must be located adjacent to a street with transit service. The facility should be located between the building and front property line, within 20 feet of an ( existing transit stop, or the facility may include a new transit stop if approved by Tri-Met. ii. A transit facility shall include a covered waiting or sitting '' area. (Ord. 94-07; `Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) Revissd 04/26/94 Page 241 rs .t. .�}.. }�.;!, ��:.� n ,4•,. r,. '.iy -., . . ✓S t�1 3 i Y -'.t x 1 j 4• * 18.106.050 Parking Dimension Standards , A. Accessibility ;r 4111 1, Each parking space shall be accessible from a street or other right-of- way, and the access shall be of a width and location as described by • Sections 18.108.070 and 18.108.080. B. Table of Standards: 1. Minimum standards for a standard parking stall's length and width, aisle width, and ,maneuvering space shall be determined from the following table. Dimensions for designated compact spaces are noted `., in Parenthesis;` Angle Minimur Overall Overall from Stall Channel Module Interlock Curb Width Width Width Dimension Parallel 8'8° 8°8° 20'6° n/a (8') (8') (1}'6°) 45° 8'S° 16'0° 49'l° 2'0" (8') (14'0°) (45'9°) (1'8") 60° 8'8" 16'0° 53'6° 1'6° 7,, (8') (14'0") (49'6°) (1'3") 90° 8'8° 16'O" 60'0" n/a (8') (14'0") (54'0°) rt j } OM Revised 04/26/94 Page 241-1 1 1 * i, , _j. 3 k . 3 . ;' . t Vii .4 + . ... �`.?4 .y. .. ..• ,. F, i .� so" .'r;". A. 'fie• �-a.... .. a f , 2. Sample Illustration . . .. , ay s e , ,...'..:,..: ...., . _ a I:41.., , i.,,.,,i 4,,,,. r !gym 3. The width of each parking space includes a stripe which separates each ee "2:21.5.:4'. space. r C. Aisle Width: _, x 1. Aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from e. both ends shall be 24 feet in width.Val`. . `, D. Angle Parking: � ' .s 1. Angle parking is permitted; provided, that each space contains a e rectangle of not less than eight feet eight inches in width or eight i,. feet in width for compact spaces, and an appropriate parking module as . '`' determined by interpolation of the table in Subsection 18.106.050.8. `' �_ a E. Structured.Parking S; 1 1 •Vehicle height clearance for structured parking must be at least 7-1/2 ��; ' feet for the entry level (to accommodate vans and vanpool parking) and :° 6-3/4 feet for all other levels. {= 2. A warning bell or other signal must be provided for exits from parking {Y � .. . structures that cross public sidewalks where a standard vision ,,.r ,l'.4, clearance area cannot be provided, n ; '4.5.:;,...: 3. Required bicycle parking for uses served by a parking structure must provide for covered bicycle parking unless the structure will be more I`s,, <. than 100 feet from the primary entrance to the building.. t:;, A, ., F. Service Drive: }: 1. Excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by !�• n I-. Subsection 18.164.030.P, groups of more than two parking spaces shall 0 . be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other ' maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way would be e required; and . QO 2. Service drives shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic, provide maximum safety of traffic access and egress, and maximum safety of pedestrians and vehicular traffic on the site. G. Street Access: 1. Each parking or loading space shall be accessible from a street and the • .... access shall be of a width and location as described in this title. y a 'y. e JF ` ' Revised 04/26/94 Page 242 x.i ee ,... 2 e. .,' ce < e. ..d `I. .r et .i •' YV'> .N«'r , : '"i c; "N GIs i , tr. H. Parking Space Configuration: 1. Parking space configuration, stall, and access aisle size shall be in accordance with the minimum standard. J I. Parking Space Markings; s 1. Except for single-family and two-family residences, auy area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in .•?4',. this chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and 2. All interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and • signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian _• safety. J. Parking and Load Area Surface Requirements: k �• ee Except for single-family and two-family residences, and for temporary �_; uses or fleet storage areas as authorized in Subsections 3 and 4 below, x '. all areas used for the parking or storage or maneuvering of any -; ' vehicle, boat, or trailer shall be improved with asphalt or concrete z ; " surfaces; ,� T. 2. Off-street parking spaces for single and two-family residences shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface: e` `' 3. Parking areas to be used primarily for the storage of fleet vehicles d ' ., or construction equipment may be gravel surfaced when authorized by the ti*" .. approval authority at the time the site development approval is given. The Director may require that the property owner enter into an agreement to pave the parking area a) within a specified period of + . time after establishment of the parking area; or b) if there is a :}_` :hange in the types or weights of vehicles utilizing the parking area; f _ or c) if there is evidence of adverse effects upon adjacent roadways, a. d.s water courses, or properties. Such an agreement shall be executed as Ye a condition of approval of the plan to establish the gravel parking .. r area. Gravel surfaced parking areas may only be permitted consistent .w with the following: ',,", a. Gravel parking areas shall not be permitted within 100 feet of any A residentially zoned or residentially developed area; `" b. Gravel parking areas shall not be allowed within 100 feet of any ' ` public right-of-way; and c. A paved driveway of at least 100 feet in length shall connect a '. gravel parking area with any public street providing access to the gravel area; e 3 'S` d. Gravel parking areas shall not be allowed within 100 feet of any 8 water course. I 4. Parking areas to be used in conjunction with a temporary use may be gravel when authorized by the approval authority at the time the permit e,, is approved. The approval authority shall consider the following in a` determining whether or not the gravel parking is warranted: {' is e Revised 04/26/94 Page 243 e.,:... y 141 . y.:. ,, ,,. 0 ‘ : . _I.:. ;.;., ....,,,,,. ......,.; ,...,,,......, ,.. .. ,. a. The request for consideration to allow a parking area in I ,' conjunction with the temporary p ry use shall be made in writing ,, concurrently with the Temporary Use application; .. � � ' b. The applicant shall provide documentation that the type; of 2 temporary p ry use requested will not be financially viable if the 1,.-:".,.: '1.'4 parking space surface area requirement is imposed; and i. i c. Approval of the gravel parking area will not create adverse " , property.conditions affecting safe ingress and egress when combined with -, other uses of the • , K. Access Drives: .." ', I. Access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas sy::',., shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the e site; r y • : :"''', '-;:-. • ,,,,, ,,,,..„:_ „,..„ ..........., , .. ..,.,,, 0. . ,,....„..,,,.,,, ....,.. ......,. ...‘: .,,,....„ . :,,-..1'3 -,1' 1'u A ty �,{:i 1 .. b Vie . t i tX k° Revised 04/26/94 Page 243-1 1 r} a' 2. The number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the ;f : requirements of Chapter 18.108, Access, Egress, and Circulation; -, 3. Access drives shall, be clearly and permanently marked and defined ' ',- 1110 through use of rails, fences, walls, or other barriers or markers on . frontage not occupied by service drives; ,• 4. Access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance as provided in , E Chapter 18.102, Visual Clearance; and 5. Access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface. `'3: L. Wheel Stops: 1. Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to x . :,'' interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel '. ' stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front '- of the parking stall. The front three feet of the Parking stall may '. ' be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not ,' exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. a M. Drainage: r,. 1. Off-street parking and loading areas shall be drained in accordance . ' with specifications approved by the City Engineer to ensure that k ponding'does 'not occur: i a. Except for single-family and two-family residences, off-street parking and loading facilities shall, be drained to avoid flow of ,, water across public sidewalks. N. Lighting: a 1. Artificial lighting on all off-street parking facilities shall be designed to direct all light away from surrounding residences and so as not to create a hazard to the public use of any road or street. A. Signs: y / 1. Signs which are placed on parking lots shall be as prescribed in ,� 3 a Chapter 18.114, Signs. 0 t i v = I, ,•- ' Revised 04/26/94 Page 244 1 7 ,' t � ' P. Maintenance of Parkings Areas: ;' 1. All parking lots shall be kept clean and in good repair at all times ! . Breaks in paved surfaces shall be repaired promptly and broken or .,.„,4,,e, splintered wheel stops shall be replaced so that their function will ; not be impaired. /' ' ; ` 18.106 080 Off-Street I;ondino' Spaces , All liik A. Buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute ; 1111, terial or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: 1. Every commercial or industrial use having floor area of 10,000 square ij feet or snore, shall have at least one off-street loading space on site (Ord. 94-07. Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) , qtr. e ,:,...„. ,..,..--•••• 0 ,, el ., A K k ee h Y•, , L 1 Page 245-1 ,� Revised 04/26/94 '' 9 { -..-:••;`='- * .t 4 4 t : • r q„ Y 18.106.090 Off-Street 'Deading Dimensions • A. Each loading berth shall be approved by the City Engineer as to design and f i location. B. Each loading space shall have sufficient area for turning and maneuvering 4'• of vehicles on the site, and 1. At a minimum, the maneuvering length shall not be less than twice the • d .. overall length of the longest vehicle using the facility site. .t. C. Entrances and exits for the loading areas shall be provided at locations approved by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 18.108. :. ' D. Screening for off-street loading facilities •is required� � aaxd shall be the same as screening for parking lots in accordance with Chapter 18.100. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) • r: ��` • • a.; • , ` ''s '' Revised 04/26/94 Page 246 d T. . Chapter 18.108 ACCESS, EGRESS, AND CIRCULATION ' . 18.108.010 Purpose 18.108.020 Applicability and General Provisions 18.108.025 Applicability of provisions 18.108.030 Joint Access 18.108.040: Public Street Access 18.108.050 Required Walkway Location 18.108.050 , Inadequate or Hazardous Access 18.108070 Minimum Requirements: Residential Use 18,108..080 Minimum Requirements: Commercial and Industrial Use 18.108.090 Width and Location of Curb Cuts 18.108.100 One-way Vehicular Access Points ,' 18.108.110' Director's Authority to Restrict or Require Coordination of .Access 18.108.120 Variances to Access Standards 18.108.130 Administration and Approval Process 18.108.140 Expiration of Approval: Standards for Extension of Time 18.108.150 Approval Standards 18.108.160 Application Submission Requirements ti, ti 18.108.010 Purpose A. The purpose of this chapter is to establish standards and regulations for ' safe and efficient vehicle access and egress on a site and for general circulation within the site (Ord.- 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 18.108.020 Applicability and General Provisions {*' A. The requirements and standards of this chapter shall not apply where they 3 4, .'• conflict with the subdivision rules and standards of this title. R. The provisions and maintenance of access and egress stipulated in this title ' ' z - are continuing requirements for the use of any structure or parcel of real property in. the City. C. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented ;•. and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress, and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. xi increasin enlarge and egress use to which the lot or building is put, thereby D. Should the owner or occupant of a lot or building change access ge he use requirements, it is unlawful and is a violation of this title to begin or i= maintain such altered use until the provisions of this chapter have been met P- if required or until the appropriate approval authority has approved the change. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) ;<I 0 ILE • • Revised 04026/94 Page 247 a 4f a a 1 18.108.025 Applicability of Provisions 1111 A. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the : construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures (see Section 18.120.020), and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. B. Where the provisions of Chapter 18.120, Site Development Review, do not apply, the Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a plan submitted under the provisions of this chapter. No notice is required. The , decision may be a PP Baled as Provided by Subsection 18.32.310.A. C. The applicant shall submit a site plan which includes: :.•z 1, The location of the structures on the property and on the adjoining property; 2. The location of parking and loading,areas and their dimensions; t 3. The location of the circulation area necessary to serve the spaces 4. The location of the access point(s) on the site and on the adjoining -�k properties and on both sides of abutting streets within 200 feet of the subject site; 5. The location of curb cuts on adjoining properties and on the subject site; S. The location and dimensions of all landscaping, including the type and size of, plant material to be used, as well as any other landscape material incorporated into the overall plan; 4111.k' 7. The rroposed grading and drainage plans; and 8. Specifications as to signs. (Ord. 94-07; Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 18.108.030 Joint Access :"..e,%* -: A. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: apt • ,4 1. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases, or contracts to establish the joint use; and CO • r y , Revised 04/26/94 Page 248 � :`.Zr+ .,r}.�". ,. .,H�i 7 q, ,.ii 1. •r i .� \ � S•iYr t .r1._ -. � ._ ,� J .0 .. � ':1. :.'Y a 2. Copies of the deeds, easements, leases, or contracts are placed on `` permanent file with the City. (Ord. 94-07 Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 8;108.040 Public Street Access y ;'.' A. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.108.070 and `' 18.108.080 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved ee by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. i ` .`': R. Vehicular access to structures shall be provided to residential uses and `; shall be brought to within 50 feet of the ground floor entrance or the ? ground floor landing of a stairway, ramp, or elevator leading to the '' dwelling units. eel C. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and ;.' shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances. '' (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 93-52) e 18.108.050 Required Walkway Location `; A. Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, a; institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the el*".,-.' , required access and egress convenient.. Walkways shall. provide convenien connections �• between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and >.; industrial. complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. ',° " B. Within all]attached housing (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family {"'.• developments, each residential dwelling shall be connected by walkway to the •'` Ash vehicular parking area, and common open space and recreation facilities. C. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, I, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic :en and parking by either a minimum 6 inch vertical separation (curbed) or a , e. minimum 3 foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, paveme t markings, or constrasting pavement ' '. materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, :t exclusive of vehicle ovrhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards D. Required walkways 'shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be ;: lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public �'' use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. (Ord. 94-07; Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) .gig 18.108.060 Inadequate or Hazardous Access C9 _ A. Applications for building permits shall be referred to the Commission for W ' review when, in the opinion of the Director, the access proposed: 1. Would cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or 2. Would provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or 3. Would in any other way cause hazardous conditions to exist which would ti ,.. . _ 0 t" constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. "-1,' Page 249 - Revised 04/26/94 i J� B. Direct individual access to arterial or collector streets from single-family dwellings and duplex lots shall be discouraged. Direct access to major collector or arterial streets shall be considered only if there is no practical alternative way to access the site • • • ^.Y °I e • • r.H Revised 04/26/94 page 249-1 } C. in no case shall the design of the service drive or drives require or as facilitate the backward movement or other maneuvering of a vehicle within a street, other than an alley. (Ord. 94--O7, Ord. S9-06; Ord. 84-61; Ord. ..'.•1-.::- ,:;,. 83-52) i • "," A.1x8.070 Minimum l�eauxrements: Residential Use +, A. Vehicular access and egress for single-family, duplex or attached :single- .7. '',..?. family dwelling units on individual lots, residential use, shall not he less than the following: Number Minimum Number Dwelling of Driveways Minimum Minimum Pavement '- '' Unit/Lots Required Access Width Width ,','11:7:, l or 2 1 15' 10' ., *"'1 3-6 1 25' 20' a B. Private residential access drives shall be provided and maintained in J : accordance with the provisions of Section 10.207 of the Uniform Fire Code. C. Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with a "'± approved. provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus by one of the L ,' followings ,y :::::::,Y 1. A circular, paved surface having a minimum turn radius measured from centerpoint to outside edge of 35 feet. , 2. A hammerhead-configured, paved surface with each leg of the hammerhead 1 ..... having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a minimum width of 20 feet. '• '.-,. .-:. ,: • 3. The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is 5 percent ,, D. vehicle turnounts, (providing a minimum total driveway width of 24 feet for : ,* a distance of at least 30 feet) , may be required so as to reduce the need ±' for excessive vehiclular backing motions in situations where two vehicles travelling in opposite directions meet on driveways in excess of 200 feet �J * 1, in length. •k 1 E. Where permitted, minimum width for driveway approaches to arterials or % { collector streets shall be no less than 20 feet so as to avoid traffic • „ turning from the street having to wait for traffic exiting the site a± !1,.1,-.7 ',..-.e; .F. Vehicular access and egress for multiple-family residential uses shall not be less than the following: b my Y j °I ,, 0 i 1 : Revised 04/26/94 Page: 250 , ,„ iii = :'A , ',, s x rs ''' ", i _ •=1. - �. Y t.=' '+ S !4initnum Number Dwelling of Driveways minimum Access Units} Yteetuired Reguzrecl Yfisnmum Pavement a 1-2 1 15 10' _ 3-19 1 30' 24' if two-way, ' 15' if one-way: . Curbs and 5° • walkway required 20-49 1 30' 24' if two-way, or 2 30' 15' of one-way: Curbs and 5' required a 50-100 2 30' 24': Curbs and 5' walkway • required +: •fie. ". •�i'. 100+ 2 plus-1 additional driveway to a public street for every 200 units or portion thereof in excess of 100 units. (Ord. 94-07, Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) y1. r 18.108 080 Iin�:mum Requirements Commercial and Industrial Us9 A. Vehicle access, egress rand circulation for commercial and industrial use shall not be less than the following: Required Minimum Number Parking of Driveways Minimum Access ;! Spaces Required Width Minimum Pavement, 0-99 1 30' 24'; • curbs required 100+ 2 30' 24' curbs or required • lj f3 1 50' 40'; curbs required �, At. f • • f Revised 04/26/94 Page 251 • k» R:'. `` B. Additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of .4e. site development review. (Ord. 94-07; Ord. 89-06; Ord. 84-29; Ord, 83-52) � .108.090 Width and Location of Curb Cuts A. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Subsection 18.164.030.N. (Ord. 94-07; ' Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) - 18108.100 Dne-j y Vehicular Access Points A. Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the 1 site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway' serving the facility; ` the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. (Ord. 89-06; { Ord. 83-52) R•." 18.108.110 Director's Authorita to Restrict or Require Coordination of Access 1 A. In order to provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning movement problems, the Director may restrict the . location of driveways on streets and require the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed access would: 1. Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or t` 2. Provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or :'1;1=e '''' 3. Cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and i present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. Yee e 'x B. In order to eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between "'' commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to ..:._f. ' • connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections. ` r '' C. In order to facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic, access and parking area plans shall provide efficient sidewalk and/or pathway connections, as ^_ feasible, between neighboring developments or land uses. .ee- D. A decision by the Director may be appealed to the Commission as provided by : Subsection 18.32.310.A, Procedures for Decision Making: Quasi-Judicial. ' -F (Ord. 94-07; Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) ' 'r 18.108.120 Variances to Access Standards r A. In all zoning districts where access and egress drives cannot be readily designed to conform to Code standards within a particular parcel, access with an adjoining property shall be considered. If access in conjunction ° { 05 with another parcel cannot reasonably be achieved, the Director may grant a variance to the access requirements of this chapter based on the standards Op set forth in Section 18.108.150. (Ord. 94-07; Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) ('B 18.108.130 Administration and A•.roval Process 1!i ..i A. The applicant for an access variance shall be the recorded owner of the affected property or an agent authorized in writing by the owner. i • Revised 04/26/94 Page 252 1 'y :>. , y B. A preapplication conference with City staff is required. ,t 1 t C. Due to possible changes in state statutes, or regional or local policy, ee , -• information given by staff to the applicant during the preapplication ' 'e...0e conference is valid for not more than six months: , '' :1 1. -Another preapplication conference is required if an application is e. submitted six months after the preapplication conference; and r 2. Failure of the Director to provide any of the information required by this chapter shall not constitute a waiver of the standard, criteria, e. or requirements of the applications. D. The Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny any application ' for an access variance. The Director shall apply the standards set forth ,. in Section 18,.108.150 when reviewing an application for an access variance. 'n'1 e. =, S. The decision of the Director may be appealed in accordance with Subsection j4; z 18.32.310.A. " F. The, Director shall mail notice of the decision to the persons who are ° entitled to notice in accordance with Section 18.32.120. (Ord. 94.07; Ord. .' 4' 89-06, Ord. 83-52) ::.2f.'- '....; Extension of Time ,' 18.108.1 ,0 Expiration of Ae�oroval• Standards for Ext —..• A. An access variance approval by the Director shall lapse if 1. Substantial construction of the approved plan has not begun within a , : • Ant sane-and-one-half-year period; or %:1'.,' " 1 2. Construction of the site is a departure from the approved plan. 3; , B. The Director shall, upon written request by the applicant and payment of the .1,-.: _ required fee, grant an extension of the approval period not to exceed one ' '; 5: year, provided that 1. No changes are made on the original access variance plan as approved by the Director; - ' 2. The applicant can show positive steps have been taken to initiate ;' construction of the site within the one year extension period; and 3. There have been no substantial changes in the facts or applicable ;-. . • policies and ordinance provisions on which the approval was s,;sed. ' C. The decision of the Director may be appealed as provided by Subsection ,. , 18.32.310.A. No notice of the Director's decision need be given.. (Ord. 94- 07; Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) mE 4., 1 . fl Revised 04/26/94 Page 253 18 108.150 A oroval Standards A. The Director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for ah access variance based on findings that: �< 1. It is not possible to share access; 2. There are no other alternative access points on the street in question or from another street; a:. 3. The access separation requirements cannot be met; f. 4. ` The request is the minimum variance required to provide adequate access; 5. The approved approved with conditions will result pproved access or access in a � a safe access; and 6 The visual clearance requirements of Chapter 18.102 will be met. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) f , 18.108.160 Application Submission Requirements A. All applications shall be made on forms provided he' the Director and shall be accompanied by: 1. Copies of site plan(s) (number to be determined at the Copies preapplication conference), and necessary data or narrative which explains how the . access variance proposal conforms to the standards: ! 411 a. The site plan(s) drawings shall be drawn on sheets Preferably not exceeding 18 inches by 24 inches; and b. The scale shall be an engineering scale. 2. The required fee, B. The proposed access variance site plan shall include the following information: µ t 1. The section, township, range, and tax lot number; 2. The relationship of the lot to the road system; GO • , r a Revised 04/26/94 Page 254 d A.. 4.- 3. The location of access points on adjoining lots and on the lots across "- the street; : ' 1 , • N 4. The location and setback of structures and parking areas on the lot and Y'::. on the adjoining lots; { ; ... 5. The location of the proposed access, and 6. The sight distances from the proposed access point. 7. Other information as may be deemed necessary by the Director to ;.:_ evaluate the request. (Ord. 94-07; Ord. 89-06, Ord. 83-52) ',, rit 1, i' ‘:':.'..,7 .. A-. el • 1 4 A7: 4 ,d . y yr. 11' ' Revised 04/26/94 Page 255 ... .,,,,,,._ , , . 0 • . :: ' Chapter 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS ??7 ctions. ' 18.164.010 Purpose ' 18.164.020 General Provisions 18.164.030 Streets 18.164.040 Blocks ° '" 18.164.050 Easements 18.164.060 Lots 18.164.070 Sidewalks . + ; 18.164.080 Public Use Areas s 18.164.090 Sanitary Sewers 18.164.100 Storm Drainage 18.164.110 Bikeways 18.164.120 Utilities °I 18.164.130 Cash or Bond Required 18.164.140 Monuments ' 18.164.150 Installation• Prerequisite/Permit Fee ,} 18.164.160 Installation: Conformation Required, ,d' ` •�" 18.164.170 Plan Checking Required 18.164.180 Notice of City Required 3. $ 18.164.190 City Inspection Required ,. ' 18.164.200 Engineer's Certification Required a. 18.164.010 Purim x4: ,- A. The purpose of this chapter is to provide constriction standards for the ,-'42,-A implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. (Ord. 89-06; Ord, 83-52) { .164.020 General Provisions A. Unless otherwise provided, the standard specifications for construction, reconstruction or repair of streets, sidewalks, curbs and other public '' ' , improvements within the City shall occur in accordance with the standards ,;1 i, of this title. ' . '''.1,-t.7=1.!, B. The City Engineer may recommend changes or supplements to the standard specifications consistent with the application of engineering Principles. }- C. The provision of Section 7.40 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply to r• I.' this chapter. (Ord. 94-07 Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) Qi, te Ii S • 4'11 2-,4;,_,. 5" Revised 04/26/94 Page 410 ' u ail , c:f.�4x I•. '. . .J Y•.:, „i Q._ '' _ ..{ . ..�; ;-<:.0.,,..,°•" .„ ,•t !,. 41'4.:1 ...'+':.. il . � t s • '' 18.164.030 Streets ` A. Improvements: all, •, 1OOF 1. No development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street; t - a. Streets within a `development and street' adjacent shall be improved in accordance with this title; i41: b. Any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with this code; and ' c The Director may accept a future improvement guarantee in lieu �w': of street improvements if one or more of the following .: ' `"' conditions exist: (i) A partial improvement is not feasible due to the inability to achieve proper design standards; , ,o (ii) A partial improvement may create a potential safety •,. hazard to motorists or pedestrians; -...."'...1'..:f-'-• (iii) Due to the nature of existing development on adjacent properties it is unlikely that street improvements would . f be extended in the foreseeable future and the p'' * improvement associated with the project under review " .- does not, by itself, provide a significant improvement i `' to street safety or capacity; .2 (iv) The improvement would be in conflict with an adopted capital improvement plan; (v) The improvement is associated with an approved land ,f.' partition on property zoned residential and the proposed r a -'' .,.q land partition does not create any new streets or } (vi) Additional planning work is required to define the :j � - appropriate design standards for the street and the `' application is for a project which would contribute only a minor portion of the anticipated future traffic on the street. S. Creation of Rights-of-way for Streets and Related Purposes: A' 1. Rights-of-way shall be created through the approval of a final , ' subdivision plat or major partition; however, the Counciltttay approve i. CO the creation of a street by acceptance of a deed, •provided that such ", C street is deemed essential by the Council for the purpose of general traffic circulation: r4., t PRevised 04/26/94 ,a:get4ll x 44. j , z # t r I a . S .• , . a. The Council may approve the creation of a street by deed of dedication without full compliance, with the regulations applicable to subdivisions or major 7 .partitions if any one or more of the following conditions are found by the Council to be .:. Present (i) Establishment of a street is initiated by the Council and is found to be essential for the Purpose of general traffic circulation, and partitioning or subdivision of land has an incidental effect rather than being the primary objective in establishing the road or street for public use; or (ii) The tract in which the road or street is to be dedicated ' + is an isolated ownership of one acre or less and such dedication is recommended by the Commission to the Council based on a finding that the proposal is not an attempt to evade the provisions of this title,governing the control of subdivisions or 'major partitions, ;; b. With each application for approval of a road or street right- of-way not in full compliance with the regulations applicable to the standards, the proposed dedication shall be made a condition of subdivision and major partition approval: (i) The applicant shall submit such additional information and justification as may be necessary to enable the Commission in its review to determine whether or not a recommendation for approval by the Council shall be made; '., (ii) The recommendation, if any, shall be based upon a finding that the proposal is not in conflict with the _ ' purpose of this title; (iii) The Commission in submitting the proposal with a recommendation to the Council may attach conditions 11* } which are necessary to preserve the standards of this title; and c All deeds of dedication shall be in a form prescribed by the Y; City and shall name the public" as geantae 4.; C. Creation of Access Easements:_ g „, 0 4 Revised 04/26/94 Page 412 {. eri' .xi,:. ..N x ° "� ''t '� is : ! t �. ..,4 i. 4 ql. The approval authority may approve an access easement established by deed without full compliance with this title provided such an easement is the only reasonable method"by which a lot large enough to develop can be created a.', Access easements which exceed 150, feet shall be improved in 1 a accordance with the Uniform, Fire Code Section 10.207, b. Access shall be in accordance with Sections 18.108.070 and 4 ? 18.108 080. ; D. Street Location, Width and Grade: 1. The location, width and grade of all streets shall conforms to an approved street plan and shall be considered in their relation to existing and planned atreets, to topographic conditions, to. public %, convenience and safety, and in their appropriate relation to the Proposed use of the land to be served by such streets: a Street grades shall be approved by the City Engineer in r ; accordance with Subsection M`below: and' b. Where the location of a street is not shown in an approved street Plan, the arrangement of streets in a development shall either: (i) Provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing streets in the surrounding areas, or (ii) Conform to a plan adopted by the Commission, if it is impractical to conform to existing street Patterns } - ilish because of particular topographical or other existing conditions of the land. Such a plan shall be based on the type of land use to be served, the volume of traffic, the capacity of adjoining streets and the need for public convenience and safety. E. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street. Widths: 1 Unless otherwise indicated on an approved street plan, or as needed { to continue an existing improved street, street right-of-way and 1' roadway widths shall not be less than the minimum width described `. below. Where a range is indicated, the width shall be Cetermined.by the decision-making authority based upon anticipated average daily # ;'; traffic (ADT) on the new street segment. (The City Council may adopt ° by resolution, design standards for street construction and other public improvements. The design standards will provide guidance for determining improvement requirements within the specified ranges.) 1 z* `:; Revised 04/26/94 Page 413 e � . 3� J Right-of-way Roadway Moving Type cif Street Width (feet) Width (feet) La n ---, , 0 r Arterial 60-90 12' lane. 2-4 , Major Collector 60-80 44' 2-4 60 40' 2-3 Minor Collector Local Street Commercial, 2 k 50 34' w, Industrial , � Loral Streets` - Residential 44-50 20-32' 2 .. Sub-Collector • t Residential Access Street 40-46 24-32 2 a. Through Street with less than 500 ADT 24-28 1-2 b. Cul-de-sac dead-end 36-44 streets, (not more ' than 400' long) and serving not more than 20 dwelling units ' Turn-arouzsds for 50' radius 42' radius ' `' dead-end streets in industrial and commercial zones only } Turn-arounds for 42' radius 35' radius , cul-de-sac dead-end streets in residential r';;: zones only 16 16' Alleys Residential 16 20'- 0 r , > Business or Industrial a � a. The Planning Director shall recommend to the decision-making 4� t body desired right-of-way width and pavement width of the ".:-,,,-'".t,1, various street types within the subdivision or development f after consideration of the followings , �fv- (i) The type of road as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Chapter .- Functional Street • . Classification; ;, (ii) Anticipated traffic generation; ••••• (iii) ©n-street parking needs; ,, (iv) Sidewalk and bikeway requirements; (v) Requirements for placement of utilities; • 0 . , (vi) Street lighting; • (vii) Drainage and slope impacts;, (viii) Street tree location; ,,i (ix) Planting and landscape areas; (x) Safety for motorists, bicyclists, • and ped.estrians, _ (xi) Access needs for emergency vehicles. d '7'2.,:',7t.'''.*..,'"','.', 1' Tiara - a1 +:: Page 414 ti � Revised 04/26/94 .,1 '',":,,••,,.`'' ll ,, .•�. w ... 1, ,•. .... �' A � .. !`.. ., ..'•.il . �' a '2. .. r. .. i . �l , ,. .. .-. . i .. 4 ;"3. b. Improvements to streets shall be made according to adopted City stane'erdsw, unless the approval authority determines that the standards will result in can unacceptable adverse impact on 4110;r existing development or on the proposed development or on natural features such as wetlands, steep elopes or existing mature trees. In approving an exception to the standards, the approval authority shall determine that the potential adverse impacts exceed the public benefits of the standards. In evaluating the public benefits, the approval authority shall consider the criteria listed in sub-paragraph "a above. i y F. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: 1. A future street plan shall: , '' a, Be filed by the applicant in conjunction with an application for a subdivision or plan shall show the .partition. The e pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division and shall include other parcels within 200 feet surrounding and adjacent to the proposed .land division. At the applicant's request, the City ze shall prepare a future streets Proposal. A street proposal may be modified when subsequent subdivision proposals are submitted. a, e z, b. Identify existing or proposed bus routes, pullouts or other transit facilities, bicycle routes and pedestrian facilities on 4. or within 500 feet of the site 2 Where necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary ' 411 lines of the tract to be developed, and .s a. These extended streets or street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cuts-de-sac since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining �'. property is developed. • b A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. c. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs j• ..;., shall be constructed for stub street in excess of 150 feet in ,, length. • r v Revised 04/26/94 Page 414-1 C. Street Alignment and Connections: ,, 1. Staggering of streets making °T" intersections at collectors and ''t arterials shall not be designed so that jogs of less than 300 feet on ' . such streets are created, as measured from the centerline of'such s. .e street. •Minimum separation of 125 feet between local street , intersections is recommended. 2 All local and minor collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when i not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing en development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this `` code. A street connection or extension is considered precluded when ' ®1` it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. In the case of environmental or a topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable { , ° street connection. • .` 3. Proposed street or street extensions shall be located to provide direct access to existing or planned transit stops and other neighborhood activity centers, such as schools, shopping area and ,,, eeee, parks. ,ee nee 4. All developments should provide an internal network of connecting +• streets that minimizes travel distances within the development, H. Intersection Angles. { f 1. Streets shall be laid out so as to intersect at an angle as near to ?y, a right angle as practicable, except where topography requires a ' lesser angle, but in no case shall the angle be less than 600 unless there is special intersection design, and 4 a, Streets shall have at least 25 feet of tangent adjacent to the right-of-way intersection unless topography requires a lesser distance; .- b. Intersections which are not at right angles shall have a minimum corner radius of 20 feet along the right-of-way lines of the acute angle; and r ? if c. Right-of-way lines at intersection with arterial streets shall have a corner radius of not less than 20 feet +' n. I. Existing Rights-of-Way: e 1. Whenever existing rights-of-way adjacent to or within a tract are of less than standard width, additional rights-of-way shall be provided at the time of subdivision or development. J. Partial Street Improvements: 1. Partial street improvements resulting in a pavement width of less i than 20 feet; while generally not acceptable, may be approved where "if essential to reasonable development when in conformity with the other .. ., requirements of these regulations, and when it will be practical to require the improvement of the other half when the adjoining property developed. l K. Culs-de-sac: . { 4 „ Revised 04/26/94 Page 415 . .., . 0 1. A cul--de-sac shall be no more. than. 400 feet long :tor provide.:.access to greater than 20 dwelling units: ` a. All cull-de-sac shall teriminate with a turnaround. Use of turnaround configurations other than circular, shall be i' •? approved by the City Engineer: and • • • x F tr tom^ k ,1 • 1 d - ♦{V `�2 cayr f p Revised 04/26/94 Page 415-1 ` , r 4 `4 �',,. ..'Mti , x. ;1 r Y j,.. k a.< L j b. The length of the cul-de-sac shall be measured along the centerline of the roadway from the near side of the intersecting street to the farthest point of the cul-de-sac. { . e 4111 2 If a cul-de-sac is more than 300 feet long, a lighted direct pathway to an adjacent street may be required to be 7 y qv,ired provided and dedicated to the City. L. Street Names: R. No street name shall be used which will duplicate or be confused with the names of existing streets in Washington County, except for extensions of existing streets. Street names and numbers shall conform to the established pattern in the surrounding area M. Grades and Curves: 1. Grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12 percent on collector streets, or 12 percent on any other street > (except that ee, ee, local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up '• to 15 percent for distances of no greater than 250 feet), and , a. Centerline radii of curves shall not be less than 700 feet on arterials, 500 feet on major collectors, 350 feet on minor collectors, or 100 feet on other streets, and , , b. Streets intersecting with a minor collector or greater functional classification street, or streets intended to be posted with a stop sign or signalization, shall provide a - landing averaging five Percent or less. Landings are that ; :^ .a portion of the street within 20 feet of the edge of the %, inteesecting street at full improvement. N. Curbs, Curb Cuts, Ramps, and Driveway Approaches: ee 1. Concrete ver':.ical curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and �' drivewa y approaches oaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.050, and {!` a, Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except it b. Where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval; and c. Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. Y; el 0. Streets Adjacent to Railroad Right-of-Way. to o• ' 1. Wherever the proposed development contains or is adjacent to a �, railroad right-of-way, provision shall be made for a street s ® approximately parallel to and on each side of such right-of-way at a distance suitable for the appropriate use of the land, and: • ai Revised 04/26/94 Page 416 .f y a. The distance shall be determined with due consideration at cross streets or the minimum distance required for approach grades and to provide sufficis:st depth to allow screen planting ask along the railroad right-of-way in nonindustrial areas. Mg' P. Access to Arterials and Major Collectors: 1. where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or major collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential : properties and shall. separate residential access, and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The ' r." design shall include any of the following: .1 a. A parallel access street along the arterial or major collector; b. Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or major collector -k to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another 4. ; street; c. Screen planting at the rear or side property line to be contained in as nonaccess reservation along the arterial or major collector; or d. Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives of this subsection. • - ° Q. Alleys, Public or Private: :1. Alleys, 20 feet in width, shall be provided in commercial and industrial districts, unless other permanent provisions for access to .. off-street parking and loading facilities are made, and e. While alley intersections and sharp changes in alignment shall be avoided, the corners of necessary alley intersections shall have a radius of not less than 12 feet °' R. Survey Monuments: f. 1. Upon completion of a street improvement and prior to acceptance by ' the City, it shall be the responsibility of the developer's registered professional land surveyor to provide certification to the City that all boundary and :interior monuments shall be reestablished and protected. ..6 Revised 04/26/94 Page. 417 S. Private Streets: to Design standards for private streets shall be established by the City Engineer; and is 2. The City shall require legal assurances for the continued maintenance of private streets, such as: (a) A bonded maintenance agreement; and (b) The creation of a homeowners association; 3. Private streets serving more than six dwelling units are permitted only within planned developments, mobile home parks, and multi-family residential developments. ' T. Railroad Crossings: 1. Whore an adjacent development results in a need to install or improve f' a railroad crossing, the cost for such improvements may be a condition of development approval, or another equitable means of cost 5 distribution shall be determined by the public works Director and approved by the Commission, U. Street Signs: t4' 1. The City shall install all street signs, relative to traffic control and street names, as specified by the City Engineer for any development. The cost of signs shall be the responsibility of the developer. ., x V. Mailboxes: 1. Joint mailbox facilities shall be provided in all residential developments, with each joint mailbox serving at least two dwelling units. a. Joint mailbox struc..ures shall be placed adjacent to roadway '2. • *1:1' ' curbs; b, Proposed locations of joint mailboxes shall be designated on a copy of the preliminary plat or development plan, and shall be approved by the City Engineer/US Post Office prior to final plan approval; and c. Plans for the joint mailbox structures to be used shall be E submitted for approval by the City Engineer/US Post Office _ prior to final approval. t !.• c Revised 04/26/94 Page.418 t;i• W. Traffic Signals: 1., The location of traffic signals shall be noted on approved; street plans, and: a. Where a proposed steet intersection will result in an `• immediate need for a traffic signal, a signal meeting approved specifications shall be installed. The cost shall be included r, as a condition of development. X. Street Light. Standards: -.`' 1. street lights shall be installed in accordance with regulations q adopted by the City's direction. r• X. Street Name Signs: ?� y 1. Street name signs shall be installed at all street intersections. Stop signs and other signs may be required. Z. Street Cross Sections: 1. The cross-section of streets in inches shall not be less than the minimum shown in the following table: e of Street Subbase Leveling Course Surface ;i a x7,,, Arterial l2 4" 4" Commercial and Collectors 12• 3° 4° 4110, Local Streets 8" 2° 3" {i Residential Access 8° 2" 3" . Streets %4 a, Subbase and leveling course shall be of select crushed rock, b. Surface material shall be of Class C or B asphaltic concrete; c. The final lift shall be placed on all new construction roadways J`,; prior to City final acceptance of the roadway; however, not before 90 percent of the structures in the new development are completed unless three years have elapsed since initiation of construction in the development; `` d. The final lift shall be Class B asphaltic concrete as defined by A.P.W.A. standard specifications; and ', 05 e. No lift shall be less than 1-1/2 inches in thickness. (Ord. 94-07; Ord. 84-50; Ord. 83-52) A • Revised 04/26/94 page 419 18.164.040 Blocks A. Block Design: = . 1, The length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due ",' ' regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control 4 .- - ' and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography, B. Sizes . 4 1. The perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet ', ' ; ` measured along the right of way line except: i a. Where` street location is precluded by natural .topography, 7^' . wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development z or; ' . b. For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access , highways, major collectors or railroads. } ` . " ;' c For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation , :: provides equivalent access, 4 g. ,;; 2. When block lengths greater than 600 feet are permitted, pedestrian/ / . bikeways shall be provided through the block. (Ord. 94-07; Ord. 89- a :,y_k• 06; Ord. 83-52) 18.164.050 Easements A. Easements: , I• 0 4 a '; 1. Easements for sewsrs, drainage, water null-tie, electric lines or other public utilities shall be either dedicated or provided for in the '. =;' deed restrictions, and a Where a development is traversed by a watercourse, or x : drainageway, there shall be provided a storm water easement or � ; drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the lines of the watercourse. ` �'-* B. Utility Easements 1. A property owner proposing a development shall make arrangements with = the City, the applicable district and each utility franchise for the y z provision and dedication of utility easements necessary to provide q. full services to the development: + a. The City's standard width for public main line utility easements shall be 15 feet unless otherwise specified by the , utility company, applicable district, or City Engineer. (Ord, y: W 94-07; Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-S2) Q t :'' ',.,,I4 .1 1 Revised 04/26/94 gage 420 �1 S 18.164.06 4110�ro A. Size and Shape: 1. Lot size, width, shape and orientation shall be appropriate for the , .:, location of the development and for the type of use contemplated, and: a. No lot shall be dimensioned to contain part of an existing or .+ proposed public right-of-way, "} b The depth of all lots shall not exceed 2-1/2 times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1-1/2 times the minimum < `'. lot size of the applicable zoning district; c. Depth and width of properties zoned for commercial and industrial purposes shall be adequate to provide for the off- street parking and service facilities required by the type of use proposed. = B. Lot Frontage 1. Each lot shall abut upon a public or private street, other than an f alley, for a width of at least 25 feet unless the lot is created through a minor land partition in which case Subsection 18.162.050 (C) applies. C. Through Lots: 1, Through lots shall be avoided except where they are essential to provide separation off residential development from major traffic , arterials or to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation, and a. A planting buffer at least ten feet wide is required abutting i { the arterial rights-of-way; and b. All through lots shall provide the required front Yard setback on each street. D. Lot Side Lines: Y x 1. The side lines of lots, as far as practicable, shall be at right l =r, angles to the street upon which the lots front. Lu • • k Revised 04/26/94 Page 421 • E. Large Lots: �.. In dividing tracts into large lots or parcels which at some future time are likely to be redivided, the Commission may require that the lots be of such size and shape, and be so divided into building sites, and contain such site restrictions as will provide for the extension and opening of streets at intervals which will permit a subsequent division of any tract into lots or parcels of smaller size, and: a. The land division shall be denied if the proposed large development lot does not provide for the future division of the lots and future extension of public facilities. (Ord. 94-07; Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 18.164.070 Sidewalks A. Sidewalks shall be constructed, replaced or repaired:.. to City design standards as set forth in the standard specifications manual and located as follows: 1. On both sides of arterial and collector streets to be built at the time of street construction; 2. On both sides of all other streets and in pedestrian easements and rights-of-way, except as provided further in this section, to be constructed along all portions of the property designated for ` ' pedestrian ways in conjunction with development of the property; and 3. On one side of any industrial street to be constructed at the time of '' street construction or after determination of curb cut locations.Allk B. A planter strip separation of at least five feat between the curb and the sidewalk shall be required in the design of any arterial or collector street where parking is prohibited adjacent to the curb,,except where the following conditions exist: there is inadequate right-of-way; the curbside sidewalks already exist on predominant portions of the street; or it would conflict with the utilities. ;: C. In the central business district, sidewalks shall be 10 feet in width, and: 1. All sidewalks shall provide a continuous unobstructed path; and ,.: 2. The width of curbside sidewalks shall be measured from the back of '.` the curb. • Revised 04/26/94 Page 422 D Maintenance: 4110 3. ' Maintenance of sidewalks, curbs, and planter strips is the continuing obligation of the adjacent property owner- E, Application for Permit and Inspection: 3. If the construction of ,a sidewalk is not included in a performance bond of an approved subdivision or the performance bond has lapsed, then every person, firm or corporation desiring to construct sidewalks as provided by this chapter, shall, before entering upon the work or improvement, apply for a street opening permit to the Engineering department to so build or construct: a, An occupancy permit shall not be issued for a development until the provisions of this section are satisfied. b. The City Engineer may issue a permit and certificate allowing temporary noncompliance with the provisions of this section to the owner, builder or contractor when, in his opinion, the construction of the sidewalk is impractical for one or more of the following reasons: (i) Sidewalk grades have not and cannot be established for the property in question within a reasonable length of - time; ° (ii) Forthcoming installation of public utilities or street paving would be likely to cause severe damage to the new sidewalk; t ., t, (iii) Street right-of-way is insufficient to accommodate a sidewalk on one or both sides of the street, or (iv) Topography or elevation of the sidewalk base area makes construction of a sidewalk impractical or economically infeasible; and c. The City Engineer shall inspect the construction of sidewalks for compliance with the provision set forth in the standard specifications manual. F. Council Initiation of Construction: 1. In the event one or more of the following situations are found by the Council to exist, the Council may adopt a resolution to initiate construction of a sidewalk in accordance with City ordinances: ; F6 • • Oar fY. %1.1- Revised 04/26/94 Page'423. :. _'?r.. , " t " s-^i l,. i �.i .:P a ;2 j •.a J ?y k. i r� A' s •A.= 1 i• • 4 r; a. A safety hazard exists for children walking to or from,school " and sidewalks are necessary ;to eliminate the hazard; b, A safety hazard exists` for pedestrians walking to or from a public building, commercial area, place of assembly or other �' general pedestrian traffic, and sidewalks are ,necessary, to eliminate the hazard; c`. 50 percent or more of the area in a' given block has been improved by the construction of dwellings, multiple dwellings, commercial buildings or public buildings and/or parks; and :' d. A criteria which allowed noncompliance under section E.l.b above no longer exists and a sidewalk could be constructed in conformance with City standards. (Ord. 94-07 Ord`. 89-06 Ord. 83-52) 18.164.080 Public Use Areas A. Indicated in Development Plan: Dedication Requirements: { 1. Where a proposed park, playground or other public use shown in a development plan adopted by the City is located in whole or in part ... in a subdivision, the Commission may require the dedication or reservation of such area within the subdivision. . B. Not Indicated in Development Plan: Dedication Requirements: 1, Where considered desirable by the Commission in accordance with adopted comprehensive plan policies, and where a development plan of the City does not indicate proposed public use areas, the Commission '" may require the dedication or reservation of areas within the , subdivision or sites of a character, extent and location suitable for the development of parks and other public use C. Acquisition by Public Agency•. 1. If the subdivider is required to reserve land area for a park, playground, or other public use, such land shall be acquired by the appropriate public agency within 18 months following plat approval, at a ,,. price agreed upon prior to approval of the plat, or such reservation shall be released to the subdivider. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 18.164.090 Sanitary Sewers 3'k. A. Sewers: Required Og Cta • I Jai k p ;4.4. i Revised 04/26/94 Page 424 t . i ?. • i' Fv s t. , 410 410 , B. Easements: " 1. Where a subdivision is traversed by a watercourse, drainageway, channel or stream, there shall be provided a storm water easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the lines of such watercourse and such further width as will be adequate for conveyance and maintenance C. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: 1. A culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development, ands a. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the Y facility, based on the provisions of the 1981 master drainage Plan. D. Effect on Downstream Drainage: 1. Where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the. development •will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance 4tE with the 1981 master drainage plan. (Ord. 94-07; Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 18.1164.110 Bikeways A. Developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the adopted ^y' pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or rights-of-way. B. Development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction a^, of bikeway improvements. C. Minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is '' eight feet. (Ord. 94-07; Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) Revised 04/26/94 Page 426 y 1' k 2 18.164.140 Monuments • A. Any monuments that are disturbed before all improvements are completed by the subdivider shall be replaced prior to final acceptance of the 4111 i. = improvements. (Ord 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 18.165.150 Installation: Prerequisite/Permit 1Fee A. No land division improvements, including sanitary`'sewers, storm sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other, requirements shall he undertaken except after the plans have beer approved by the City, permit fee "' . paid, and permit issued. B. The permit fee is required to defray the cost and expenses incurred by the City for construction and other services in connection with the improvement. ' The permit fee shall be a sum.equal to four percent of the estimated cost of the subdivision improvement. (Ord. 94-07; Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 18.164.160 Installation: Conformation Re. ired A. In addition to other requirements, improvements installed by the land s;. divider either as a requirement of these regulations or at his own option, ., shall conform to the requirements of this chapter and to improvement standards and specifications followed by the City. t., B. The Standard Specifications for Public works Construction, Oregon Chapter A,P.W.A., and Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No 71-9, shall be a part of the City's adopted installation standard(s) ; other standards may also be required upon recommendation of the City Engineer. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) r . /8:164.170 Plan Checkin Re ired A. Work shall not begin until nine sets of construction and construction estimate plans have been submitted and checked for adequacy and approved by the City in writing. B. All such plans shall be prepared in accordance with requirements of the City. (Ord. 89-06 Ord. 83-52) 18.164.180 Notice to City Required A. Work shall not begin until the City has been,notified in advance. B. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the " City is notified. (Ord. 89-06; Ord, 83-52) LIJ { - Revised 04/26/94 Page 428 } t• r*F CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO 94- AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AMENDMENT (CPA 93-0004) TO THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN VOLUME ONE TO ALLOW A GREATER VARIETY OF IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS FOR LOCAL STREETS AND APPROVING AMENDMENTS (ZOA 92-0002) TO THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER 18.98 (BUILDING HEIGHT LIMITATIONS: EXCEPTIONS); CHAPTER 18.106 (OFF STREET PARKING AND-LOADING REQUIREMENTS); AND CHAPTER-43:464--(STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS)TO ADDRESS STATE OF OREGON MANDATES }? :1 AND OTHER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES. WHEREAS, the City of Tigard must address State transportation mandates that require improved pedestrian, bicycle and transit accessibility; and • '' 'E WHEREAS, the City of Tigard finds it desirable to improve access and add flexibility in its street design standards; and WHEREAS, the City held numerous citizen informational meetings about the amendments; and 7-s WHEREAS, the Tigard Planning Commission held public hearings for CPA 93-0004 and Y for ZOA 92-0002 on March 8, 1993, September 20, 1993 and October 18, 1993 and = , recommended their approval. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: ESECTION 1: The proposal is consistent with all relevant criteria as noted below: { The relevant criteria in this case are Statewide Planning Goals 1,2 and 12, City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1 a, 2.1.1, 8.1.1 and 8.1.2 and applicable Community Development Code sections related to legislative plan amendments (18.30). • ti ORDINANCE No. 94-0 Page 1 • • a yf ... • ,.{� .. .. ..t . • • . • �'': r. .. .1':. . i ';.s? t. +, Y'.�. � to The proposal is consistent with the applicable statewide planning goals based on the = = following findings: 1. Goal 1, Citizen Involvement, is met because the City has an adopted citizen involvement program. Further,the Planning Commission and the City Council reviewed this proposal in public hearings for which the public was properly notified. w =� 2. Goal 2, Land Use Planning, is met because the City has applied all relevant statewide lannin P 9 goals, comprehensive plan policies and community development code requirements in review of this proposal In addition, the City has coordinated its plan with the plans ofpotentially-affected government units by soliciting comments A on the proposed amendments and considering ary comments q received. t s 3. Goal 12, Transportation, is met because the City has adopted policies relating to improving the transportation network and continuing coordination of transportation improvements with other r involved agencies. 3 The proposal is consistent with the City's acknowledged Comprehensive Plan based on the following findings: 1. Policy 1.1.1 a.., requiring consistency with statewide planning goals, is satisfied because the amendments to the community development code will bring us into compliance with OAR 660-12-0-453) requiring improved access for pedestrians and bicycles. 2. Policy 2.1.1, requiring an on-going citizen involvement program, is satisfied because all NPOs were notified of the hearing, numerous I. _~.. public meetings were held and a public notice has been published, including the date, time and place of the hearing. E 3. Policy 8.1.1., requiring a safe and efficient transportation network, is satisfied because the comprehensive plan and community development code amendments will improve pedestrian and bicycle safety as well as the efficient use of the street network by potentially decreasing vehicle miles traveled within Tigard. Permitting narrower . local streets will improve the efficient use of transportation resources by discouraging the overbuilding of local streets. ti ORDINANCE No. 94-01 Page 2 a t : F ; n : ,.. ., i .).., ,,,i.,, 0 • : „,, . .. , 4t „. ..,..„, . _. . .- -- ,W 4. Tigard Community Development Code, section 18.30, which , '' • establishes procedures for legislative•code changes is satisfied = a._ according to the above finding. ` f' SECTION 2: The City Council hereby amends the Comprehensive Plan and 4 the Community Development Code as shown in exhibit "8". h I.anguage to be added is underlined 9 L�is i. Language to be deleted is shown in ]` + SECTION 3• This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after'its passage by x the Council; approval by the Mayor, and posting by the City ± Recorder. r Ltflon moats vote of all Council members present after being PASSE: By read by number and title only, this gaL°�° day of L , 1994. r -. .44 1 .N 1) i .. . atherine Wheatley, City Recorder ,, i .' :4. APPROVED: ")/.1'4%CC. r A PRO M``ssGD: This _ day of - , 1994. ,,. Jack Schwab, Mayor ,;r Approved as to form: l' ` eity ttorney Date .� .�„i.. 1146 t ORDINANCE No. 94-D'7 Page 3 TTT yi i ! i r F ¢ �I f Language to added is underiinecl "�{ k - E�PBIT °�M Language to be deleted is W ut/brackets' r PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN VOLUME I INVENTORY TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER III. FUNCTIONAL 'STREET CLASSIFICATION . ' The transportation system within the City of Tigard is facilitated by a ' hierarchy system of streets which are defined below. In discussing a street �` ' classification system there are several factors that need to be considered. These. include: The capacity of the system needed "based on volumes of ' traffic; existing streets and proposed street * standards that would accommodate projected traffic volumes; through traffic versus intercity ti. , traffic; and land use. �' t " In addition to the above factors that need to be considered, Tigard's ;; l transportation system must be coordinated with the Metropolitan Service FY District's adopted Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) . '`t. { €_ "The objective of the RIP is to identify a transportation system that will adequately serve the travel needs of the fast growing Portland Metropolitan area." The specifics of the RTP as it affects Tigard, • and Tigard's role in .? :y transportation planning as stated in the RTP are discussed in Section IV - ' 52 � Street Improvements in this report. .. MSD further states that "The RTP includes criteria for a highway classification system and adopts a map delineating the principal and major . r arterial components of the system: In accordance with this, local ` jur_sdictions are required to adopt a map delineating the ,various highways; in their jurisdiction and in so doing, are recommended * to adopt MSD's J classification categories and definitions. ,-' k 4` In adopting a highway system, local jurisdictions must provide for Metro's 1. tea adopted principal routes and major arterials and designate an adequate minor . arterial and collector system to meet the following criteria: 2 ,. a. The minor arterial/collector system must adequately serve the local .t travel demands expected from development of the land use plan to ,, L the year 2000 to ensure that the Principal and Major Arterial System is not overburdened; and :s i ,: b. The system should provide continuity between adjacent and affected ; jurisdictions (i.e. consistency between neighboring jurisaictions, . consistency between city and county plans .for for county facilities within city .boundaries and consistency between city and ODOT ' ar 4 .. plans) . i ; n 1{ }, ,,,,t. - .,,:, . h r --, .�.- „:,..,,,,.,...rt. .. . ....,,-:,-,..-,...-2, '.. .i' 1 ' •a , 1 , 1 w,r DRAFT MSD's Minor Arterial and Collector system will be adopted from the locally ' 4 "!':-;4` adopted systems." 4' In addition, local jurisdictions must ensure that their designed. minor arterial/collector system provides the desired level of traffic service. Toward this purpose, local jurisdictions must identify in their Comprehen ive Plan sufficient investments in transportation capacity to ensure its arterial a system can adequately serve at least the travel demand associated with MSD's = year 2000 population and employment forecasts, and provide at least the highway level of service defined as minimum desired in the RTP (See Table 1) . The components of the Tigard street classification system take into account the 'definitions of RTP. However, Tigard's classifications differ from the RTP in the following ways: ,1) Tigard's "Arterial Route" definition does not distinguish Prin, ipal,' Major and Minor Arterials, although the varying arterials in .the Tigard areaeate, listed according to RTP• definitions; and_.2) ;4. <• the City's "Major Collectors",cross over into the RTP's definition of" Minor Y, Arterials." , Although there are wording changes within Tigard's street classification { definitions, the intent of these classifications is to complement the definitions in the RTP. 1. Arterial: , • The primary functions of an arterial route are to serve through trips entering the urban area (metropolitan area) (a] (and arc) to provide a high level of mobility for travel within the entire metropolitan region. All trips from one community or subarea through an adjacent community traveling ' ? to other points in the region should occur on a major arterial or principal , { route. It is desirable that it be a multiple-lane street «pith access/egress traffic controls at carefully selected intersect A ion p rots. Dire aecessv:.tc �. r r _ , ,..; ar�eraals from �nd�iu�dual °xes{ad.ences<'�r co�excza' o � used, shall be :oroh :bated - unless:,no,:.othe,_pract cal< access :exis ss • S`a i _ _ •, g . -;, Y i X54+ 1I h.• ■• A-2 ✓.1 L, - 4 - . . . . D RAF T 12-29-93 ,r Standards; Right-of-Way Width 60-90 feet .i Pavement Width 12 feet per lane t - Moving `Lanes 2 - 4 • Volume r?,. M H-:Y� . 6,000 - [20,000)4414,000 vehicles per day Driving Speed 40-55 miles per hour 2,__Major Collector: The primary function of a major collector is to collect and transport traffic ' '` from a lifer of local neighborhoods to one .or more arterials., In addition, ., these facilities are primarily oriented toward travel within and between .' •_ adjacent subareas, and provide connections to major activity centers within r the area. t : 411.E . : .: —Y.� ma c'm`l c ous[St] should have a minimal' number ' of ' controlled 'access polA `.$ . �:= _ two or more travel lanes• have fairly direct arterial i " to arterial connectors; and provide for relatively rapid movement of traffic. '` ::,{� In doing this, the likelihood of local streets being utilized for• through '` } traffic and cross-town travel is lessened. Traffic controls should be '• 't utilized at intersections with arterials, major and minor collectors. '' (A) other sr a `function of this classification should be that of - providing a means for edestrlan and blase travel Parking.,may or may not be • � �a?;•:•:•,;ph;x.•:2..rl;..Y >�:'.:,we,.+:<>`"iYC:. Y{,., .;.;. .c:.;x �. .,Y.? �'.. + ..?... ,y. ..}`.o'..i'k. ? S - t '(� ,t .;<. 4+k'"J`.'.ty. < ..,+k n�..t s. }?..> '- provided. ate t?ac ces r s:ma ;r� :.cQl%lxectttrs.stem ni r:w c3uayl}%resa-derices><kilt r: ;;:, ..,� ..:•4.,.� ,.;.: �.,,;.�, ?., .?.. ... ..—.—tom: .::::....:.�::.:. .. .°t ?S•?£•.{°•J.•.o..?4<G+Y. .... ..:5;,,4::;:: s`{`? 6<: :.�"k!";tw••>;w^. K;C;iG :1,,.} ,r r.•oy: ...... K: :t h bited: .:�±rx sd.m othe 4",'Tg: orsyz x�:srs ' Standards: Right-of-Way 60-80 feet Pavement Width 44 feet Moving Lanes 2 - 4 fi Volumes 1,500 10,000 vehicles per day Al Driving Speed 35-40 miles per hour(s) ,. , 3. Minor Collectors The primary function of a minor collector is to collect and transport traffic ,' � from local neighborhoods and abutting property out of the neighborhoods to t` ',, major collectors and arterials. The minor collector should provide an efficient circulation pattern within the neighborhood for distribution of , traffic to local streets as well as the major collectors and arterials. [A) Another [occondary=] •function, is to provide a means for pedestrian and bike '= travel Parking may or may not be provided. D�,rect access to minor colledters fray _ ndimadua3 residences»` shall bec•discotiia4ed The: e t; re• i.re .essences>=<totstak ?:3cces.:,.1racm.s:3owers order:.}streets .or:;aa :Y<>:rgi :ic ' shared{4Ce6gg✓ dr*eiii5i'S • } a RA Sys A-3 1+ - D R A F T 6-15-93 '': 4 Standards: Right-of-Way Width 60 feet Pavement Width 40 feet Moving Lanes 2 ,.1 Volumes 500 -- 3,000 vehicles per oaf• Driving Speed 25-30 miles per hour 4. Local: .• i k This street classification's primary function is to provide direct access to �i "" abutting pr,�opert and to allow traffic movement within a nei s hborhood rd Ea ' '�c , e a gg 'k• ,a`- arms. B ae. 7$, ° sbnn ,ot Q g• -ogni Mar; •' ,, w£!efeg."y'; argsS el rY:.•ae a•t zi•;, ," 1 reil ti a1r ''!':''''-'k'':..'' : ?r� `e r3s w a. r> a3r,i,iy �X,i. 'G x 'oC• ,y,,y, {vf':r. <�,�<,y r .c .4: tiv,,..•K +r H o �:. .: ..tt.�5.6r«':ofl Yl.Y.S.'�.�.ID 'c 'i S Y i is S C',�� - ,�X "'q . :1' t•: f' t { i%goi Y.s" •z0 it,Wi E. ''a �F'£/r'' axiiff"/ Luca -scree t9] ,-- iiiI „'±,- sfo d ] I. iil [ -.. " - . "'`�N/='`�.`'E`arid'"pro;ivi:de for pedestrian and—Fire gavel. : Ji j.:.. .S.` a`},Y,4"'C'/..`,.,,.<7,AifS,J'�yt?;'t?'4[fi Y, ::F' :sr;•'r' ..:�.%y '.• ""•.:c7.:."•a:.� �g •Y°:'.R'� GSil'y.�.yl;S'.y'^'.,'sa.».: "???'h�'>!4x°l4';'rt:+r;''.:°„i) "kSk?c:n�>$."-�.Ct,tJ a sty �..of I o Y.S� I?:EY t IM -' '�e>i, ark x 35 • �i. �#3 `fs3. 3L� *. 'y€2 - e q. y:;tr , 4x` ,.fix 1�qY.•)r.;ccW'iui•r�ta .w�>• v.avw.ta6xf^` %MS�Y1TMwyO�yy `K3�c+r:•:M1SfSi"?c� 3r1. �rLL''e ; stye ;..Mai dills hn=��:a.:::. er " ` ,'- r4- :.. • :� ,, .s. �. .trrrr ..:n Sa% -...; ,.<,AWU/y i,�,l..a:Q:r.,xys}Y.'y.a� xf'd+.:uyv{,fno% -n.%Y, a.xeyr�aw•u0^d' :' ..Y�+Y'�'.Y9; �i° x"v :,{ic:.'wx"r?'.. .•..w.;?w. 1.{ve4a/•:hk''FURY'{4YU �¢r/•;-t',i`,csa/.4. ✓ g krles?_ e t .al ,r<ge e s f !-e:'e-.� �" 8 e r .4 s - igMfi 3 *T 'n.> :t is�,.a. *g • 'w;;K+'tt!t�!S!dy"%%,lt..;l ..:{W.,iyf.:f..Y<a!o-.•.Yr,;;..:itttkcYHffl••.or i'1SS.+3"�" 'R?'1+'<4 :t' "1.Y,..Y%;Y.N i+;t:;4[haYNM.v.1...::)Y�•.. _�:•v.•?:Y.i;i' %{. :?jGXt.�'�/•!UM:'tlY<`.C4::;' • y� °'. q.Y� r ZIMMI 0*9 - 4. ire .o O 4 Erma `.€f i r`�eg :den •a]E " ei1 ��' v,Y.LY;}-Yn�:yL2 .y Y}4' ..'fi: ;. ..•t': EVD I,NYA "I t h a exwo d i Ot -:'.0<. 1-')e i/c eigi ilfgt"}, K 1ect&s o.AWAIT* + ?•?'laN"J"{.a:'.:'v:•>I-'fi)tix!Yq'':%'ti1:•:K{n:""'-fi:•%:/.:X95:':?}%{:H!•i:!:J..•:Y.{•:4?:4"•' r.Wl.•>:i'4"}y'Y.t 1/ •y. ••^^9CGW. !Y•tthN•.,v:Ci1.4Ai'{-.••};: ...«ViF%41.4':<{.�r:;j••: •p)Y.•k�Lf:rF.i4G!'ix!r•a%ltiNi;nN. ;:' 651W. fiC tra f- rr�arf>:ire. raYl nee boor's s €afatrafel tapes anx3.i*V.Z y: r 1 >iiq ..,:..`. '. :v:•if+r'{.4-'N'J.+iYA...........y::.:• n�..:.hii)):4;}:" riM?Y' .0%f/X'>/"• y,..)y� ..Q%a):w• M .. ry"x'<;to.r}.:?>: jGG:)Nli ;;illy ::OF�n.L.fl<>: v.F! .f..:..; ...ytr:tv}.ik:.x //rf'f'r"i^. r:F` .<. 4'i '/..lv �?:59=.' oJ.r+�.>i'fi- ^';}+a?� '...{{ :lartes:��:shat�::l.!:�.:•er�:�.�.: >�.be..>yo'r��av�t�edxYo.a� :es_den~ _a�1f:'fsfnio.��e�tox<s..<.;}�ikts�°c�•e�a�€ks v}Y'•i•)::, ;4;4•.: . 'Y.4?l::^i:;!N )rv+•Y•?YiL' 1G;4•. •::J% at%"y fir. C,t:'f.•:t:t:ijtv,li.•r,:!:ty} }?isyt•'.rii.aj;:;:.J:.:^.•:i:.;.%a::t•.;: i` F.4i4;'.. I>-'. �i-:'r! :. '�.. sl al:l..:oeneralxly :be).:p=ov ded :on�bot .�<:s :des< Q s�fresident?aal�'��su al sectors J . . -::.,:.,.::..v,..:..:.a:...•a•t::::•:::.,•::::!..•r;::);•:e::::•::4)i);;:•t;;))•.,••?x4??:).,?.;,.;.•):•?:;•))ar:i.?•..•xt.:4o-:;,•...;;.:rr .-vr:.?..,r,:.,,.•raw..;4xrr.}•Y.n:.}:.;t: ). c. d Ies3denti 1.access .st'reetS are. /iiftfended sle T3zoUaideaazrea at ess to)s.nd3.e- .... �7• }.s: f �� - ?:e sxe .cs: ; n�h: an , iiriu�, J ��Y��z<t'a f�� 4 bf��tlse? s< • »��»; <...•. {.; resadeife alF:accss nstreets shii:i N WS I ii %i tifxio iore 'gn` ij. ,• :::.:::�:.:.::-.:::::r::.::-:t•:-•:::%::-k.A.;...y-:,». ....?ira:r ••:.ay-,.{rt,;.jy..,.,:.1:,-.v.;:..;:nxr.:.•:;;airF•»>;::v.:;::J-.,Y»:_:.r: :,i o:).:n:...Mny.>/:.%4•`yi>i '.E"• :,._....:. .)Y.�:.v;;A.r. .Mr•:.r .j-+:•.-:•o.�':::.:..,.. d q: :o,t:<.:n::::.: ..i.k..::..:,.:. / •:'w.-v': !Ctt :Y•./+�G.f':.a.{.k.. .,a; 11. : )i•+;S!:'% s < Reside t: a .,a�ceess>:..stY'ee? s<��i iax.Y3 x ne :des' 9 erg-}trs �:a r ..:t{tlae`:<j•s eas t:::<:'aibifa�t;naf -:. ;,•t.. ..-•.,...::••:.wall:.r.,,•:::.:-::1-:•t Y�i%:n..:'-'--.., -:.!t.:.:i{�`•t;;N.�:n?-'•!s;{.;.a•<q aa)?.,.�,J....,ya�.}x++° 6Awlf.^' <aY.+4i<+•%•`•a;^%Uri. ..:.)Y.:iN:t-x?Y.:•:;;::�,.;!.y-fh:,:a>,%.r , ,t., is S: .. >/s ,�. <! 4:.: t c. hJ� .x.!. ,.}}..:,:.• ;aw.. . izafk a�<!a: >:la n ds s peels.:.i,;.�r'l°2'�e<k;tlevelss meet j dec s: on Balm'' ;a iEW# :.g a psa ....- .vim.:.:.. r :•:.,.. .a...,:- .r.. ....o: .. .•.r..:.... .r...r.. ..t .a.. ..0::i;:>:: ::%;:j:c •::%::7%: :C[)n' s�d[�:•:<k;:a':°%t�3G7� �ted>f :tif<af.'��c..:.::�:e�sre:�s:-.,»�ai�c�...�a�..k ...aema �'==t.��i'e_`��.�:>c�ete �:�., ,-,,,,..;.:.,-,7,':# .................:. x ..:..... • .... .:-,:.:n..r.t r.. :r.,;:;4.••:pi:%.:tn:•}. .n:NY:''!,'r6:4?iV--.{ri:nvt.?:{.:r,{{.ti} ; :irfiirotr:emeriti::'r ecfgir�etuenis<;::>fn r><.=:r'esident" :�a: : ::access:,:streets ...,.Cud de sacs and 4:; ` sloop ystree•ts< are ,permuted alilio gl thi<(length of these reels `shall > a Ci ,:1-:;,:i...,.;:;;;1,,,:: ].limited >so...,;:as ,toss tirovade..<,;for,•,<::treater,t.-: nterco=, ectedness of:.' residential `,' neighborhoods. Sidewalks:::shall ...be)...i-eg gyred cons stet -with' an`i`c_catec pedestrian traffic Standards: Right-of-Way 36. to 50 feet • Pavement Width 22Pto 34 feet Moving Lanes 2, i'nc€ or queu street••for very '_ow eraffi. c `.. : vol.ziuies 7 Volumes 0 - 1,500 vehicles per day '1 Driving Speed 10-25 miles per hour ° '' GC Cul-de-sacs 35[4-G) foot radius turn-around and 400 o'h feet maximum length. • T a c t d'evelapment a• • 0 1 Nt f n 4it 3f a (determine a.pro riate ri•ht of 1'4•S � �: t t 4 ... 4:h: .' way ;and pavement widths for pr sedl4 ocalM streets) cased `upon- tcae aniiclDated al :tear cx levels` ant c.i• ted d m 4d 1->, or on street i:`: •arkin ' ' ..-tih sisal characteristics„of< the( 'street's-,..:l.ocati©n:.: ands number of access drivieways iftc $' the.:.propo`sed"s'street_ f 1 The City shall provide, as part of its Development Code, for an exceptions process to the adopted street standards, upon consideration of the ; .; Transportation Policy of this plan.. nr' 4t x ?? 3,, .t \i'- '\:>_.Ly\:�a:.;1B (tov-,T A . .,,,,,Y} v t , Sri / .^3.t . .: •i Y' y ,} l r 1 �'. ...._. 4 :,t txt t,t ... �•t -°x * . . ,f -• ;:• x,a . -r ty`� j ': D RAFT 9-993 n ' Language to be added is under<i}3nedIb :ocked .„ Language to be deleted is [-s _= ,....,......:,.....;...r...,::::::..% Code Chanter ,18.98.020 Building Height' -Exceptions = A. Any building located in a nonresidential ;one nay be built to a maxi height of 75 feet; provided: 1. The total floor area of the building does not exceed 1-1/2 the area ,,: of the site;. 2. - , building height of—t'._ pe-i-ncipal 3tructurc,] .' (.3-,3 The 'structure is nom wit i e75� fee -of� a>Ybuilda x.2v't (a t g itihin a residential zoning district.'' (ord. 3906; Ord 83-52) Y{ C Y ' . . =, �; N:\tc in\patty\chapt18.b-1 :.. rnJ ,4 Y Y ,,y 4 J • xrn.[ ^,., 9 ..5. ° .'> '> ( 3'd r'::e.: 4 4;Y. ' 4$:4 ti , t k 97 ' ,y a 2_:: .7,::_;.::',;-"!--:.,;7.:% a T � Y z ,},` ' t..,...,.. .. . ,,„ . ....,„,:, e . 4 .f: r . DRAFT 6-15-93 . . . ' Language to be added is underlined ':ag1SL , . Language to be deleted is [ "_= _°s/brackets ;w Chapter 18.106 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REi UIREMENTS . ./-,17,,` sections: � w¢ L 18.106.010 Purpose , 18.106.015 Applicability of Provisions f'::..,:-.-.. 18.106.020 General Provisions , 18.106.030 Minimum Off-Street Parking Requirements „,' 18.106.040 Modification to Parking Requirements 18.106..050 Parking Dimension Standards 7 18.106.060 Reservoir Areas Required for Drive-In Use ,, 18.106.070 Loading/Unloading Driveways Required On-Site 18.106.080 Off-Street Loading Spaces z� 18.106.090 Off-Street Loading Dimensions 18.106.010 Purpose ;- A. The purpose of these regulations is to establish parking areas having • r adequate capacity and which are appropriately located and designed. to minimize any hazardous conditions on-site and at access points.` B. The parking requirements are .intended to provide sufficient parking in close proximity to the various uses for residents, customers, and employees, and to establish standards which will maintain the traffic ..:‘,.,..,s.z,:..„ carrying capacity of nearby streets. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) " ° .` 18. 106.015 Applicability of Provisions • ;pa A. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of r4 ',: .t. existing structures (see Section 18.120..020). and to a change of use a . which increases the of--site parking or loading requirements or which ,, changes the access requirements. [An1 'ADEQ Indirect Source Construction Permit 4.-3]1:44y4:.6, required for parking facilities having: ` 11 ry 250 or more parking spaces. B. Where the provisions of Chapter 18.120, Site Development Review) do • n- not apply, the Director shall approve, approve with conditions, car deny a plan submitted under the provisions of this chapter.: No s • (I) notice is required. . The decision may be appealed as provided by: a Subsection 18.32.310.A. . • CO _ C. The applicant shall submit a site plan which includes: , , 1. The location of the structures on the property and on the adjoining property :, e 2. The delineation of individual parking and loading spaces arid „ their dimensions; ,'', u y j+ C i r 'It r. JMp4: t n t' DRAFT 6-15-93 3. The location of the circulation area necessary to serve the spaces; 4. The location of the access point(s) to streets, to accesswayrs and to properties to he served; 5, The location of curb cuts; J 6. The location and dimensions of all landscaping', including the type and size of plant material to be used, as well as any other landscape material incs r porated into the overall plan;. 7. The proposed grading and drainage plans; and • 8. Specifications as to signs and bumper guards. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. f, 84-24; Ord. 83-52) 18.106.020 General Provisions A. Parking Dimensions 1. The dimensions for parking spaces are a Eight q" txf, icthtg{i'i;b ies( c fcct] wide and 18 feet long for a a standard space; b. Eight e a 1`] feet wide and 15 feet long for a compact space; and c. As required by applicable State of Oregon and federal • standards for designated disabled person parking spaces. B. Building Permit Conditions 1. The provision and maintenance of off-street ark and loading spaces are the continuing obligations of the property owner: a. No building or other permit shall be issued until plans are st+ +� presented to the Director to show that property is and will remain available for exclusive use as off-street parking and_ loading space; and • b. The subsequent use of property for which the building permit k is issued shall be conditional upon the unqualified continuance and availability of the amount of parking and loading space required by this title. • uj s � a . ., .. i !:'4.. �'�� Y "a, y;, r it g v v t ., S j 2 L i„+,' + 4 DRAFT 6-15-93 j C. Parking Requirements for Unlisted Uses 1. Upon application and payment of fees, the Director, as provided by Subsection l8.32.090.A, may rule that a USe, not specifically< . ,° ' listed in Section 18.106.030, is a use similar to a listed use and that the same parking standards shall apply. No notice need be given. The decision may be appealed as provided by Subsection 18.32.310.A. The ruling on parking area requirements shall be based on findings that the following criteria are satisfied: a. The use is similar to and of the same general type as a listed use; b. The use has similar intensity, density, and off-site impact as the listed use; and c. The use has similar impacts on the community facilities as the listed use; 2. This section does not authorize the inclusion of a use in a zoning district where it is not listed, or a use which is specifically listed in another zone or which is of the same general type and is similar to a use specifically listed in another zoning district; and ' f` {; 3. The Director shall maintain a list of approved unlisted use " parking requirements which shall have the same effect as an amendment to this chapter. D. Existing and New Uses 1. At the . time of erection of a new structure or at the time of enlargement or change in use of an existing structure w ithin any district, off-street parking spaces snail be as provides in accordance wits Section 18.106.030, and a. In case of enlargement of a building or use of land existing yE, `= on the date of adoption of this title, the number of parking and loading spaces required shall be based only on floor area or capacity of such enlargement; and 0 -. b. If parking space has been provided in connection with an existing use or is added to an existing use, the parking space shall not be eliminated if the elimination would • result in less space than is specified in the standards of this section when applied to the entire use. a. ` E. Change in Use 1. when an existing structure is changed in use from one use to another use as listed in Section 18. 106.030, and the parking requirements for each use are the same, no additional parking /' y µ shall be required; and i° .. a y.l. r' _::,�� .•.+G t`ir asa 1 '� :.�f- ; c' s; ; r, : . • ,. • . . . .: - . . . . . DRAFT 6-15-93 . . 2. Where a change in use results in an intensification of use in ._ ' , . terms of the number of parking spaces required, additional `: parking spaces shall be provided in an amount equal to the ' difference between the number of spaces required for the existing use and the number of spaces required for the more intensive use. ` F. Shared Parking in Commercial Districts ,{ 1. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may i agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the to hours of •operation.do not overlap; 1::-..-,:-, ,--.. :,,,;;. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be �} presented to the. Director i� 2. Satin the form of deeds, leases, or contracts to establish the mint use; and 3. If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, i*ii ` uses»°ehan`ci the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each—separaEely. ` G. ' [ ha d]uiisitO Parking in Multiple-Family Residential Districts :1...- -.,'''' -'; I. Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces ` shall provide Cohered) parking for the use of (all of thc) guests � of , ` - ['a31 of thc] residents of the complex; and 2. (The-ehered)K4Wea parking shall consist of 15 percent 'of the total required parking sp ces and 'shaii be centrally located. ....... '....<..' within ckt gto n si..a k1.t i� ,oC ahwft.;a'ta uY hs•�LY'aei�'•i:it,.��t i;'v i.....de th3..Xe•{•'%...t?d'.?i c e'"'•v'" eloi ipme nta:•:s 1 ' ' ` kgifti red a a defc�' ttr_Af__ral;r b kVG ;?n _? v h ♦ • • . locat ed iaii o:r esWii d S:€Fibittd,sEl i bif4ff it ti4e/ e.e 6ik+Yen v^Si H. Location of Required Parking ' 1. Off-Street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings }`, and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on 'the same ;, ,s, T lot with the dwelling; and 4 r ,Y 2. Off-street parking topaz:co]lots for uses not listed above shall >; be located not further than' 200 feet from the building or use '" they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the a. : building with the following exceptions: a. Shared parking areas, as provided by Subsection 18.106.020.E Y ' for commercial used which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required r; -I 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the commercial 'r building or use; and Q�f b. Industrial and manufacturing uses which require in excess of 4(. spaces may locate 'the required {spaces in excess of the 40' ' : spaces -gip to a distance of 300 feet from the building. Y r 4. ` j R�. • • DRAF ■ 6-15-93 • I. Mixed Uses 1. Where several uses occupy a single structure or parcel of land = or a combination of uses are included in one business, the total off-street parking spaces and loading area is the sum of the ..:�:: yr,,••�e. irements ofd the several uses computed separately{-]a:n h v. :t4i3- d ..d •df. � <t?6LD 3tc{ti^ A sac.�_t: "'T g9Ifte 9 'j 4 ,, k. a: J. Choice of Parking Requirements • 1. When a building or use is planned or constructed in such a manner that a choice of parking requirements could be made, the use ` which requires the greater number of parking spaces shall govern. K. Availability of Parking Spaces 1. Required parking spaces shall: ` a. Be available for the parking of operable passenger automobiles of residents, customers, patrons, and employees only; b. Not be used for storage of vehicles or materials or for the parking of trucks used in conducting the business or use, and c. Not be rented, leased, or assigned to any other person or � '" organization i,_tn-lese .._.tie _qui- e`a--r"rt33ther--,ef=spee ] [3'r--P _ - lcg ry ? d: • _ • - - - - - .. c - - a { •• park- --g --- s-t: of one uno- -• a - :. o a `' ailcr and oati3ficd. ] "' (1,1-7-11p.; Parking Lot Landscaping r. ®, 1. Parking lots shall be landscaped in accordance with the requirements in Chapter 18.100. [N-] i<;' Designated Parking for the Handicapped 4 L+' 1. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. '! tt i . . . . . . . . ® RAFT ' , (e--)Ni<. Designated Parking for Compact Vehicles Y 1. All parking spaces designated for compact vehicles shall be '. Mr, ' f'2o:CY'f'NN,tM-T•r-•cay. s ilW aitd labeled by painting [the word3 "CO.UPACT ONLY"] on the a',: parking space. q,`. [P'-] Bicycle Parking z , 3.. At least one [se eared g a<b a bicycle frac]c] ?x �aw{}p6 qK•N�`SvY5S > . c3p am k"s m ' shall be provided 7° =4 _ , &i for r�e [eaelt)" 15 * .aa b; u _ p arkin g spaces ...g... - ereo in a ny development unless otherwise s.ecafie• Glg C 6y e 5i�� Ls�v�x�_ ����,r. -. 4p�77 y T % ^iv yJ rAhH 4}s �3fWM-L-'-k•fiO *\Y�i al: '�{. g #?i ryg�gSg* artew arSe7 t:It E1,-fa� tb T•i"va° `a-** t - x' •9. L': .A: vt+rtii:;3xib1Sr dSVif �s �r.TA a: 'jOMT x ({ R � x ti HA': ,:a . N �YMM r s6rs Q Q 3 ...:_g ' _____I -' Y g ¢. dr¢ <5ir l ff +s:'}.fa if a - s Q t # Y u{r ggig ti ":x tx vglym G ' ,'C,d Axi<�a af s#f">YHe'Y$y,t a,Y s.,y:fc•- Y : .,_rov _ y •, }em dlud z w{??3 ___ _�, � - - G` '2T 4'pi'' ''"r a 't' .sT. .sf So� y:oY_c t .am .c $ V S '�.V{ssr li o .•.Y ` R �§ ,_ ,— „ . ..” :.... v-iKj ai •�^ J fee o iNaru ,w•�M°�M y nw t s-rzs�es , h T perY- os�>] �e' b dycle, ar)d fac li iehali be:tilac un ler,.co er : Bicyce parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. (Q--]P Lighting 1. Any lights provided to illuminate any public or private parking t. K area or vehicle sales area shall be so arranged as to [reflcc) = direct the light away from any [nb.tting or) adjacent residential jt district. Y ; "R41-)Q [Tc Pccdy for ...sa by) Final Building _;nspectio- r 1. Required parking spaces shall be complete. i _i , improved to City j standards and available for use at the time of the final building "" inspection. e IS-]R"; & Plan Building Permit Prerequisite 1. A plan drawn to scale, indicating how the offs-street parking and loading requirement is to be fulfilled, shall accompany the ,ti request for a building permit or [earl site development review permit in accordance with Subsection 18.120.180.A.12. .,A , [T-]5 = Measurement for Required Parking 0 "" 1. Finles. othi-ia3.se•specified, w[W]here square feet are specified, the area measured shall be gross flood area under the roof measured from the faces of the structure, excluding only space ,. devoted to covered off-street parking or loading. 1. F' 1,''' - .-.,' . C-6 ..:,.„..-:„:„ • . ,• t .} } d . . Y . . DRAFT 6-15-93 t ;': [U )_: Employees '' 1. Where employees are specified, the employees counted are the persons who work on the premises including proprietors, executives, professional people, production, sales, and sistribution employees during the largest shift at peak season < (347-z-)na Fractions 1. Fractional space requirements shall be counted as a whole space. • •fix 1:314.71V' On-Street Parking �` ' 1. Parking spaces in the public street or alley shall not be -- eligible as fulfilling any part of the parking requirement. r -, (©rd. 89-06; Ord. 84-29, Ord. 83--52) r }f 5 ? { %:,�mw'n �Yf+ •:..• i'n 4,.,-: c%'�"'�'•9"'�' r .rv'T^«q":vvse 4T --&-,- mr T,� y.Q�+/.tps y� ,(Ram '{yayayc d .'; V4f Pi t.gieiif >g� ft`alitif.T:e&ri Fi,n'Li 61 r an .624: .•titI amQ ;: ,!'...y... i; t P a f 3.gr i•;g• i•- r ad3`n {.:t�x c:r•o rcir en 'rc••Vr:;.Ye? ss C r o f f'0:s h{ I t inr t e?eMatlika .a Yi It,r._`d-_•a!—aYOa0 u vS a,�yY cf os s . •• sha]1 a3agir efere tig tlo31 q . ' D yik td dl 4i.skan I .. ,...r. • :7'.-...; ^for4e nvh M'TE re.esttstiden"s r i?erar$ r^, satesrs to e s e� A t tgattigarmarasigtegfit t l sln a %ee} 9fx ar i 0 }s egazish I4 Yd 'T 4 + .reses,are <ea 115161 p ui pox x�tagg v✓ entisl u r ,A,.yx.i car �vof 4 rrPcaci xsha :"L 'S os r b r ew .aiS entry n eesi#'o� he •i.• bra lT I Vva:t`vTv n':.tsvh,a;g.e.f{rve:ig•�.Y..ia nr'o•••La ef v r�� YtSueex Ls; + r�i{n✓t wgotlti:e rCe i+i{isf}t-, { .an S '' a ,,•• drsa a' � y L iC}dyJCLt p �7� ,1 Cleg Tn 1tG a ra c51! fw r xln s: li<4,:tt•:i *ul4 SeYp ar c T.?! t ew. ore Bere t a : caraoo `sa}ri ;ool'sfiaces{,sh: >3`S e4clear1 >desianated:tor<usorl 4 d'r' . Y w :rt: (� � - ? bra ca .00ly� o�;<�rannoolsr bei-ween. ,. t30.> , '!i }anc : 3t1` _ • ': :. 18.::10:6:-:.0..,i'•0 Mtnlmcr >eiti freet. :•fPgeli-alq wReguiremehts 'got some- use ;.f . {.;,:: .: };..,ti} i :,,;:4-{.ty.}:}v},:,.r:^:fv} Y.{t .{a. � ,T •_ .•,r .{••: t•, ,�;v.' classzf ii-at.ions{listed Ybelowz a�.ndsdateS addi4taanal:f3a�c; rc e ugrk nv _euu•3ire: en..s •:a}}: :ffA: t '--:x.,r{Y• yri: { ;f?{•i .. ....... ..... b.6 iondt �'.he reeniligiigi.it af.> Oode{ Se.txonliAMSM. 020 ;P s.., • A. Residential Uses 1. Single-family residences 2 off street spaces for each dwelling 1 (attached or detached) ura Q.[;...o.e-Of wh? :h- 1 .� E- [ea-'a loca-1- �� -� r�] ee'vcrcd] [ - - - ., • - ' • . - - - - [� .mod-_ .t-1-r .t spaces for each • . (attached or detached) • -a - , - 00 on a collector or �which _ha, , b,. . sed) arterial ..-et) 2`.: Two-family residences Same as single-family 3. Multiple dwelling Also;s[5)ee Subsection 18. 106.020.G ='Y ' a. Studio [covered] 1 space for each' unit. r , . 7 ' { i t'.„7,.1:4;',.; t ., > { x .ta > i t .7;7..d :.;.,''''7'..'4'%''..' v ,i ) ,2.. ' t z d > .. .. i. .,, .. .. .. :. . .. . . . . ..... DRAFT 6-16.93 . b, 1(- ) bedroom units 1.5 spaces for each unit (fie fc covered.) c. More than (4) bedrooms 2 spaces for each unit [--eL per unit parking epaee] . Group residential 1 space for each,. guest room plus 1 space for each_employee V. Group care residential 1 space per. 3 beds plus 1 space for each employee B. Civic Uses -L, ,...,-,Community recreation As, required by facilities . provided r 2. Cultural exhibits and 1 space per 400 square reef library services of dross f loo area..'1 . rx:ycle sres� 7� lfl` i :SCf..z fL. 3. Children's day care 5 spaces plus 1 space per classroom 4. Hospitals 1-1/2 spaces per iced 5. Lodge, fraternal, and 1 space for every 4x ( 1 fixed r ' civic assembly seats or every .` [ 1 feet of., bench length or 1 space for every ILOa, [431 square feet of [go..r1. loor area in the assembly area =ice 'tnere are no Tied'seats L f A 6. Public agency 1 space for ever: 350 square ,r< administrative feet of gross floor area service 7 . Public safety services 1 space for every 'employee of the largest shift • S. Religious assembly 1 space for every 3 E.G: fixed seats. or every 6 jam] feet of bench length �., in the assembly area or every 50[38'9] square feet of floor space in the assembly area where there are no permanent seats, whichever is greater el 9. Schools a. Preschool/ 5 spaces plus 1 space per kindergarten classroom x '• x. - c-S . M 4: .. r .n ,':t'.x Y.:J ., ,{ ,,.ar a u -n f '•• t.�. .3 ,''ir *.. it •,}, +, ti .r • DRAFT 6-15-93 mik y ° .i. b Elementary, junior 105 spaces for every employee, high school or plus 1 space for each 100 equivalent private square feet of floor area in 3 or parochial school the,auditorium or other assembly or , 1 space for each 8 seats, whichever sl is great, k L1 'r3rWit c. Senior high and 1.5 spaces for each employee, equivalent private plus 1 space for every 6 y . or parochial school classroom seats, and 1 space for each 100 square feet of floor area h, or 1 space for each 8 seats in- the auditorium or other' assembly room, ' .whichever. i's -' eate_ d. Commuter-type 1 space for every full-time college a ivalent studeni e'j ' e. Resident-type 1 space for every 3 full time college eguivaler.t. studentst A b1.cycle"-rsiace a t2� ✓fi r f i:.'.t'ifre,.r.<eafti S�° i f. Commercial or business 1 space for every full time school equivalent student; .. > icyc�e�=stacs rs classroom C. Commercial Uses r ' 1. Administrative and 1 space for each 350 square professional services feet of gross floor space 2. Adult entertainment 1 space for each 400 square feet of • gross floor area if bookstore, and e 1 space per 2 [6] seats [e e e , .. .. _' ..3:. if theater 3. Agricultural sales 1 space per 400 square feet of gross floor area, but not less than 4 itt spaces for each establishment a 4. Agricultural services 1 space per 400 square feet of gross floor area, but not less than 4 Fa' `;' spaces for each establishment W 5. Amusement enterprises 1 space per 300 s uare,feet of gross floor area, plus 1 space for ,every, ILL 2 employees or 1 space per 3 [4] seats if theater { -...,,I.,,,, ::::. DRAFT 6-15-93 . 6. Animal sales and services aa. Auction 1 space per 50 square feet of gross floor area r ,.'' ;'; b. Grooming 1 space per 400 square feet of gross floor area = c. Kennels 1 space per employee d. Veterinary I space per 300 square feet of gross -:''-.:.4 .:- floor area . 7. Automotive and equipment 1 a. Cleaning g space per 500 square feet of gross ., ,, floor area . b. Fleet storage 1 space Per each employee on the ,,,,,,--:,.f.. largest shift or 1 space per 1500 ' a square feet, whichever is larger t 1 ,- 'k='. c. Repairs: heavy 1. space per 500 square feet t� equipment of gross floor area, but not less '�` '' than 3 spaces for each establishment .' yT ' d. Repairs light 1 space per 500 square feet ',;: equipment of gross floor area, but not less than 3 spaces for each establishment {^, ; e. Sales: rental: 1 space per 1, 000 square feet - farm equipment of gross floor area, but not less '"X' than 4 spaces for each establishment C f. Sales: rental: 1 space per 1,000 square feet ` ..` ` =- heavy equipment of gross floor area, but not less than 4 spaces for each establishment `1 :, g. Sales: rentals: 1 space per 1, 000 square feet light equipment of gross floor area, but not less . s than 4 spaces for each establishment • a h. Storage: 1- space for each employee on - nonoperating vehicles largest shift (or 1 space for each qT9 1,500 :,quart fcct, whichever i3 .:\ ur larger) i. Storage: Recreational 1. space. for each employee on vehicles and br,zIts largest shift (ems : s:.r - ? 1,500 equarc fc scr a j ) Y f a i C^10 S Y h 1.1 <} y , :W b .:. 1 , 1 "k, S I` { Y�i! f;',;'''.1.?"'-`:',., 1 Yp r x DRAFT 6-15-93 8. Building maintenance servicel space for each 500 square feet of gross floor area, but not '.less than 3 spaces for each establishment 9. Business equipment sales 1 space per 350 square feet and service of gross floor area ,-1, 10. Business support services 1 space per 350 square feet of gross floor area 11. Communication services 1 space per 350 square feet of gross floor area , '~• 12. Construction sales and 1 space per 1,000 square feet - services • of gross floor area 13. Consumer repair 1 space per 500 square feet services of gross floor area 14. Convenience sales and 1 space per 400 square feet personal 'service of gross floor area, but not less ; than 4 spaces per each establishment 15. Eating and drinking 1 space per 50, square feet of sr establishments dining area plus 1 space for every 2 employees 16. Explosive storage 1 space for every employee on the largest shift or 1 space for each 1,500 square feet, ..nichever is larger 17. Financial, insurance 1 space per 350 square feet and real estate of gross floor area 18. Food and beverage 1 space per 200 square feet retail sales of gross floor area, plus 1 space .for every 2 employees • 19. Funeral and internment services CO a. Crematory and under- 1 space per each, 4 seats or. 8 taking ,.z feet of bench length (in depth] , or 1 space per 60 square feet where rem there are no fixed seats b. Interning and Exempt cemeteries +, • , C=11 4 i_. 1 ® fir. /}�, p• yy}/( ,. _ .. . , ...., ' 20. General retail 1 space for each 400 square sales feet of gross floor area, but not , less than 4 spaces for . each +-. establishment 21. Laundry service 1 space per 500 square feet of gross floor area, but not less than 3 t spaces for each establishment 22. Medical and dental service 1 space per 200 square feet of gross t . • floor area 23. Participant sports A .4 and recreation r,' a. Indoor 1 space per 300 square feet of gross floor area 1. b. Outdoor 1 space per 100 square feet, plus 1 space for every 2 employees 24 . Personal service I space per 500 square feet facilities of gross floor area ', `` 25. Research services 1 space for each employee on the '� � p j largest shift or 1 space per 500 : square feet, whichever is larger 26. Retail sales: 1 space, for each 1000 square' g , bulky merchandise; feet of gross floor area but k :{ i.e. , furniture, not less than 10 space_ for each " i appliances establishment 1 • 27 • Scrap operations and 1 space per each employee, , rec.-cling center but not less. than 5 spaces for each` • 'f, establishment 28. Spectator sports and 1 space per 3` (5) seats sr 6 i-14) j,. ' : entertainment feet of bench length la. 29. Transient lodging and associated uses 1 space for each room plus ? fa 1 space for each 2 employees a/3 , restaurant/Iouncre 1 space uer 10 3 sci, If . of seatino 5:1n fra area banquet/ineetina .rooms 1 :space:..per: 200' sa.ft_. of:' seating f' all area } ,` D. Industrial Uses ' 1. Manufacturing, 1 space per employee of the s production, processing largest shift ' and assembling si ,�J � '.'.x A , ]Y 'c.i 9 {'.; i Y:';" t .4 � .�43, .3. a .._. •''�. '_ , r.r ,.. ; .. •�. t .. ,--t .. f , is j .i. D R A F T 6-15-93 . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ". . . . :,.. 2. Wholesaling, storage 1 space for each 1,000 square .: and distribution feet of gross floor area Wa i s - :. Ar*V ( p i. u g----1- space per 700 square feet of patron A, serving area and 1 space per 200 -. square feet of office area) 4 j eare-est TJTrrs7 ent] t '>, .,. ;,f: 3. Mini warehouse 1 space for every 200 square feet of s*. t gross office floor area, plus 2 ' '.. spaces for a `caretaker residence. ': (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 87-04; Ord. 85-07; Ord. 83--52) A' ,q 18.106.040 Modification to Parking. Recguirements .' A. The provisions of this section as to number of spaces may be modified :' by the approval authority as follows: ,,, ') 1. Compact Car Spaces , a. Up to 40 (�5] percent of the required parking spaces may be ' compact:.:spaces; and 2.- Group Care Residential Facilities, Group Residential and Residential Homes a. The approval authority may: upon request, allow a reduction in the nnrber of required off-street parking spaces in z, : housing developments for elderly or handicapped persons if �, such reduction is deemed appropriate after analysis of the ,- resident auto size and location of the development, :; $'zt � y ownership, number of employees, possible future conversion fix, , to other residential uses. Notice of the decision shall be ,,; >' given as provided by Section 18.32.120 aid the decision may 1,-;:1:;71'-'4 be appealed as provided by Subsection 18.32.310.A. (Ord. '' 89-06; Ord. 83--52) ,,: i 3 :Central aliS: ;ness Uastt ct :' IX �1p E lsa section reserved) T ;,. 4 :Park?ng Reduc..taon:neater nsit FacI11t2es a -jhcarporataoz of ans� cf xelat,ed<{ �f c�lat�es{ {such as fbtsS sto•s` and< •till outs`{ bus shelters •ark>aisd{r-ide-. stations transit oriented °development or -.other' :tzansit related fact'lataes, into the..,.swte, de+aelespment;<shal<l ..be::f eligible` for s C-23 S r a ' s' -:4 , � l� ` 1 A• D R A F 16-15-93 �..- Y < .=r. +r.,vx R•' `+ 5� x k 3 yA• .,. '+3F£^.) . ,,n:.. _ Jyc } `,.{ . i o` tESti{fT�'Q E Vie iV . 12,DIiSti 'r'E iRi i s"o igki 'fig a Y&, �2 ,: W''� C f'�<Y i .rll.<. Mt4r'+ .'Y Snli S'. Ft`J:MYYI�t9f ^C{�Yi:. .W.+ !r•-•+j H C4Y.•. XC ,}�L[nM{$MYAnY. •yJ( acesxasss1ecia aaarsrdc�c raL "� }ora° a` !z,wLKrN32 i t 1{ wfi a.�,GvpgE q+ �l i6rlif g:.0• t � &-ft l'K -i.-S n! ab gi alr° • 't n. .r er H .r {:$ Teire ls x ?af2! zs -: f $• 1-271‘4.-0-1--- f y ' r............,,,,........:4' ./".. '441 ry ..„: m vw /�i++r ei f{, Ylsgmy c '..,a&”F, tti ?'p Y rHe{ - f»ay .!_W M=la. .• 0"a . „,,, , a-.. 0. T - -t a` el:,4? +0.vz�g2 ^= >2ja. 3 Y i i, '.. `T x . - � � a !•t�� , * � +, ' a ' "4 $ L,, .0.3 t r �+ s a:_k 3: s e a a x k . x , *63• 27 4.,.;x u -s ,+ w?6.,':so-eig—-,4,, ° . Y 4'r�2 ts}�io)s .t dz, a$s 4.A ': ,_ , bLf tjis • 4a.. 3 � : "iY S' 1 �SSib9 i $• gt���$ ijY' • 7 v i�i 4C+4 . � a �i i aa Lan,� ,-37g}ce .'R `o727,77 -44,4- 3 ssw.` k, f � `a° b ~ ,,_„A 'raw ari d. ; b -,t- a`n , 4 4'4:, q" '.' fi i. iY11.v• 17x 84 6Si 4..t a-A Viri'44 #a( �..'- .1'.. eSiNi8➢a;- ..a. {e►aA°a f i ID.:. i'ftd'F1i• -:Qw��Xyy.tiYEi'{;':a'ary+.... .,-«.v",...-.:w...w.ar.•, a...• ...++wyw -..•,�.+w.»....+.•..,r..,x .. ! ,,{lo-r.„- - »r{auras+c ..",..,-.. .l�-iN 'I 3x•? • ...,"4"-.. --- . ....--,---,------ +. S---‹• n n c 31.Ta�x S a o • axa ar i > o g i:� 4a , ^'.r;9;'WG HH i`r,{`i.'3`n*•i�,i,1'<t.w0 x y.. .,n ni5” {a. u z :. as .:w� :� ew s ei Z :-.xt:nT._rig ay,-Bgis-:fla+):-:o>: s}j """r...""7"". -nS4 -yJ • {' SrL:'c1n rt zcSery ce:2s %4:'''.'4' ''''", 3r ?x Y <w f{ 3 ., X )^ 3 $ J, :.+ )7'^ F$•,rC"w'¢S> { y $ Y h• r~ ft ..t, g,,, J • :4• 4;:. €r ,itdp{ to f�,o) 3741"Centt_�i # ilBi fi •r E Edac3iiEklaa 8"g4e •^ 4°'-[}�i;>;4 ' a+lr rat: :5.w csf�x>csne b arks.' sti�ce...far..3:.each:����� scar6 f eat r'f fraliis�.t�Ffaclll.s..ty` :. v d Rec€u :�r'ed e1:ements t of=. tJ , Cy SM $w. T.. { S Y+. .� �Jtrar�sa$t�l Cac It ife be; ecar#. ••.�--.��". .k} ,.{<:. ..,�....>:.$:. .,i..:<.:,..r,. $.{. ,. �ace�t tee ra �ee.: zith'' flung t-t 4 �, Y-'{ .x. r�,t. T :<.,.{L.. 3 w +S t ,) a �_. i Se�C*�1.'4�:�E� c�i�31�n°^.•�a��:���t� S�ffl`�£��"�.�..i`.�lQ1:tt�aP� 1 •:f+.:.:.,•:l:+GY4+L{' �.y,,?Y l� K.. f� :3E tCeE n<•t�ie::-.1')i:i lz•"'.t�, :4 : } �� >ncx a��c���`r�cn xarr�oei .`n T2.. .feet' of: ai3ke 1 gtT ct trari$t.�. stop. or -ac1 Ii m ' nclude a :Illein'}>.:tx ai . z 4stop`.;`i f -:a broued by r� 'ie ay ry f ii transit >fac3lrty d sha inud cles. a> covered iaiti:ia or J ,7iit,:n slttina area it '> " 18: 106. 050 Parking Dimension Standards i4 1, r;' 'l A. Accessibility z 1. Each parking space shall be accessible from a street or other right-of-way, 1 g y, and the access shall be of a width and location as .�„ described by Sections 18.108.070 and 18.108.080. St, ` , B. Table of Standards: 1. Minimum standards for a standard parking stall 's length and W width, aisle width, and maneuvering;.space shall be determined ' ""° from the following table. Dimensions for designated compact '',, � ;? spaces are noted in parenthesis: i , t r ti C°-14 " 44 6• a4 1 i-1' 1 -i .M, } t } F ' e {1 1 u •. . ' D R A T 6-15-93 -'.--,:.: :.%'-- ,{ [ - -nrvcl Ai-slc Curb Length Curb Width i� ' t - ,' _ • z L ,,. `�, '] ,2s n„, (2©'Q”) tee_ -9'ol, Y _ 9_L .: ■ol0 12!rf!1 9_— n l n It :c t n n 2-4-i'g t! rn I n to a -',� ynr <.. Z� f h ; ;. i,£.j u tt"'� `6"'� ft n`! y4o„ «Y"9'f%,9d -,y�tt_. $ .. Angle 3ganlrium..::.iwY-.re,vex; tats ,.<.riavez rt. .-0t�.t t v tt < d:fxx'. .....x,-,�- f,+Ct; - '-f''n:•r 'Y.f' i • fro >:N . . :..:. Sta•_il ; tl. ? haWnelt: .MCiall • �.!:. .},- t 'csck{ .::'''''',:::::::.t.:t Curb=,...i ...:Width;gal:-.'.;.°W dth t. « . ,.Wad1 >..I. '. .:Dimens :on 1+ f � Para le1 '., g t;a fe `.:.. ... :.:H.f.B.'' .:; ; .. 2.0%6! :T:. n_z.:' a :: S. .' ,:. •:' t. 'a, o �R s 3 1 A f r > .�: E,.ea 5 - t E te ti ix.: 3 . ;ry£ aki. sy, , . .. . .,. r .S . 3 4. :. . . . . _ .. # .e � •• .�3 3t , . t t .;1 :ii$ =rv:( .t i e:: E :m.:I.j .t f - :. ..K t 'Q- : ` ...Jf f•Id r i . J cc7Q GG i 8RJ•'t:-va'i �i F E`{h .?i/y :ti:Y ok g 7 .ri l E„4's Y . ._ : f,:-. . . iov ..•i.:S .:,:.t. NQ . ..,,,. Q 3{ wv, s � . rd P <u att�U � ^L . �42:9,.t.�.Gr�.. :i (4...-:::,5.,.,.?..,.........-1: • � i:. v Y •St% w h ,yt"R;V ± i% :s' ,/ E «. n a t ;i . � 4, ? _-31e Illustrat_on: iik . . .,.-..,,, l .--. ."-'3'.',:. "'„-; ....f....._ ,,. zzz:i . .-.-„,- ..._._. ....__ _________-,--1-- _____J ' 4; a.. 3. The width of each parking space includes a [four inch wide] 1 ` 1 stripe which separates each space. QO C. Aisle Width: * 114I f' 1. Aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access _, from both ends shall be 24 feet in width. , D. Angle Parking: 1. Angle parking is permitted; provided, that each space contains .' a rectangle of not less than 'ei-aht [n± -:e) feet .eicht-:-•inches in R --I'';. A . _ r '''''''.7'1.::''''''''' DRAFT 6-16-93 . . width [end 18 fc in l 1] or eicht_ [S—_- 1 feet in width (end ,.: �_e- -c--- ----) for compact spaces, and an appropriate paiacr � :. �:$ nodule [awe-=, nl as determined by interpolation of the table ,.. in Subsection 18. 106.050.B. E'' Structured Pak --g ;•;,. ..,.::.: ''{{ ..........ts�.�y .pp r (� q�� yq e� ywQ'/� y }, .y •y �e a� l �L. :M.64i V �' >eight i&ke eelmadv,f 'f stiructuY.ed.Kb.a kIn +g.muSt bd at{.lea St' :::x:.•:..::t:.,�rr...:f:.>-:..-�:ro.'.:.,+�:.a'.�;{ .w.:a-.,r,:ao�'CK5u'r`"'�?L iv'SY..F�>:r>:o:.., :.:{:rq'��:.1/'.at-t•;aN,ci>.,::,E,,.>.. _:t > :�,,."•tv,, :^.•-»r�SQy>;•-. 'i".,...4'-:'..."; 7<:.:I:f.-g*ei e ror zi re e g iit:eve Al't`o ecco�t�date�;var�s: Gird uaniaoo31 :;:>:{•k .>ntvS";y>�>»vw,.t•':,. ...'GG;>" -'Y^; ':^cixs•-a>:-j: ••>.wr.•:S• � 1�,.{.t...,,�•,•.,,- )1.., .x�:iv^?n;,y - ile.iT3t '>5�73t re.+?segrii�ggilh 07 2@ '9 E e :, r:`�' �� ,�>r:,,>:.�,atft,^•.. "'"�.,".ctx'�..�r '4 �,�'hss�a:.r'ro�s #otc•'"^"Y,.'t,�^�z^;r?Ftry,>•y ^Mz ru^r„��x >.s� c z... :Az;r wif'`7smtvarn 3.i}s3 , - s1:.9 a3 st :b RG,Vic3edr,srar��fex eit , - o�»ifjr.,r Y%W')'2=�� ^>N. �Y' �',y•�'v;�-.Kr.;ya:yy:^t;;aF'r3o}Y. >S x;�{:' +t. y,;pt� ,c r..�,>sv t;k v Ss x":Sf6'kC .4 `�'. ` i. p' r3calg:.. -°.u• " ..'t e• -4 agg a ; 'c:� eoa �1�goog 'id aawstvt � ., ., e > t t.t��xtaix•o�>n ni kti;->.aca+c>:a:>a. i >;:.r,:.:+•-:n�•v:o... �,.x_ , v1.J�iiiive3ggigiiC"''. f�h�:fggrai nsL gi •2''•+ovgdea i�. ? i t: >.,. ..r:r:v.,•.•r,.c t::t.•:%t..•..,�toyy..y-fc:;r�.:.:::vZN!{Y,nA'•X ..t.tc v �. t�, ro �a:_ y: `J•"'"lt'y;:y.* _, t ,,, . 3 F:�:ae i.rat fiisk l:e-earl£ rfg forj:'•uses�served y v' a bar3LInakxstri cttare. . ....:.. :.:. :::i n. ...>....:.. ...:r •-.;.:v.nv ::• 4:f'•iJ. ;,;ii '�>'1..::::..ii-.:"v'::. .i.:• �%;:jam:.>'->i}iy:• Y'+.': •�,^. t i. S.:X'A avid t Ee. h `.St'E' `gdE: icvc e tfkit'`!f!'# iiii1ess the t3 33c' re "'' ':•fi::r >$>:i' v,N> :t�{n> '"•i. - '.I• .�� .:v_ .Y.. 1... t:.i.�K!L ij.y,..t.i ,. :�..' . big T. b& ore< tha�a':,1OO r'fee rb-m ..ne Dr azv entrance o :t�e `='a ou 'hdarq.{ 3, (.--- .1F'.. Service Drive: 1. Excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as _ ice' bv Subsection 18. 164 . 030.P, groups of more than two arks , , spaces shall be served by a service drive sc that no 'tacking ' movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way would be required; and a-a t 4 fi - r 2 . Service drives shall be designed and constructed to facilitate �_ the flow of traffic, provide maximum safety of -�af: .c access arc a ;g_ess, and maximum safety of pedestrians and vehicular traffic the size. 'y 4 1. Each parking or loading space sral be accessibl _om a stree . and the access shall be of a-�:idth�and location as described In ,. � Y 6 1 t. this C.?tle. CE-71H. Parking Space Configuration: .1 a 1. Parking space configuration, stall, and access aisle size shall a'. be in accordance with the minimum standard. �' [Hilt..: Parking Space Marking .„ 1. Except for single-family and two-family residences, any area (9 `r intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this chapter shall have all parking spaces - clearly marked [ . = . - -`l ; and ' ,. A' 2 . All interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular , and, r .: '_, pedestrian safety. ,, i 'i1 ; ':'''';‘,1-t--',-.1. C-10 a r „' < ` 1. te 1. ] In no case :shall the design of the service drive or a drives require. or facilitate the backward mo emerit ' or other maneuvering of a vehicle within a -street, other than an alley(—and) ' S L' - tir" X11..'-. —A'.•wi d.t. _ •.7 A..1� .C-• - r . z 18.108.070 Minimum Reauirements: Residential Use A. Vehicular access and egress for single-family, duplex or attached single-family dwelling units on individual lots, residentiad use, shall not be less than the following; ay L: 'lumber Minimum Number Dwelling of Driveways Minimum Minimun Pavement Unit/Lots Required Access Width Width` Qt .; 1 or 1 15' 100 . 20 ' ] a. ' 3-6 1 25(9. L) B. Private residential access drives shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the provisions of Section 10-207 of the Uniform s r Fire Code. C. Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided a' • with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus by one of the following: 1. A [ ] circular, paved surface having a minimum turn radius measured from centerpoint to outside edge of [44] M feet. t 2. A (level,] hammerhead-configured, paved surface with each leg of the hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a minimum width of 20 feet. D-5 .;;;:*•,1 • { . , t. <•.`-? .. -.- -'+ .. ..9 .. '. .+4 a.,{3 u r . il{ .a .,;., Ld er✓� { .. !9> .i'Y. .a. •'. . � s o • DRAFTS-9-93 •; • ° 1 t S'55.' <s.w lk:Kr- 3, Yp �':YSS,� vrr !van,:kr J" } ct+ ?.`�R 2,0x5 n.i # r tx-[s c,,,{ ��4w 3`.0' {fixaaasr® �I x cr reouei acundos.).- cen J i „:,..'�ly..e „, N„..,„,,,,...,0 < a �q a 0 5 .,i?. .3 ae LYE 0�a�.5 .kme .P ,..1.4.1:4 x 0t.;u 9:E. rc '�}��,�y�ry��w ^'�+p��� �3.��� ��?!!��+r9Y�'f;11'�'J 4 ail ,per�yR.K C� ; �}� * ,, S0 .. Ya 19'{2 i�al ?.4.. Ib.* 9_, ` 45+ '9J Q. �. 0,... ai�L"'Sfr?�� �. a' ' 2 0 Ai '7 nH ! ti 3 k.1 �.�. . �+�a..ff� -111,1:!:.f#'- �s.�'%'�'� .3.alt<'w $^ G5d ���iC7 ,ti�C4-�'z�%.� . o 7� ��p °(T ' Vst� y +1;- ,u''-'` ' ' � z+{ {'n'i'Cte-."ate' 48 4 4`4,4,,, 0�.• ..ya.3emu._.... .£y�'. ` e ary Y a°c xs u ," ?E. i+ 3 a ,2 _kJ' --,. .... a';_ 31.1 ' 4: 4v a .xzfa&IY 8 , 'Mil h _tn 5 i r. . // A3 Y Y : i a*,,a4 7 �, d+69 .jiY , +4,7 s `eir �±g ,1,a ,ms o ,: 6: �(Q 4, F.. 4 T.� ai 4 4. l Y a° R. '.. 2 . .,...,- i x :Yo" '4.h ^"i': c• W f [D] Vehicular access.and egress for.multiple-family residential uses shall not be less than the following: Minimum Number Dwelling of Driveways Minimum Access Minimum Pavement '' Units Ree,wired Required ' I& 1 ittE tc i 1-2 1 €�=] 5 r; . 10' 3-19 1 30' 24 ' if" two-way, 15° if on,e-way: il Curbs and 5' walkway required• x V 20-49 1 30' 24 ' if two-way, or 2 30' 15' of one-way: Curtis and 5 ' ; -we kv.'ay reauirad t ,>� 50-100 2 30° 24 ' Curbs and 5 ' walkway required " 100-k [ h ,nn ] [tin:: addf »n l] , 2 plus 1>additi onal' dravveitay 1 to a.-: tub1 cf s'Z eet°`for ... eve * 6ti`'tiba lY6,: tion th4i'446 IW giigg s;".nf....1.60 110 Its [ a public strcct] 1.. k. > �(Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) o y: ., D-6 ` i ,,,,,,t R.', d, . „ ,. ,, .a. Jl }.'c,,.. .,4 *:.:•7.-",,:. . ., ril`_, . . ... sra ., { ,, :-,4r ..t °Z.. • .. x,. p • r . . . . . DRAFT J0. AF T Y .0 �rn�_'�'� • 18..108.080 Minimum Rg uirementss Commercial and Industrial Use A. Vehicle access, .egress and circulation for commercial and industrial use shall not be less than the following: Required Minimum Number Parking of Driveways Minimum Access Spaces Required : . Width Minimum Pavement 0-99 1 30' 24' ; curbs required [ sicic.aalkt wy 100+ 2 30' 24 ' ; curbs [ or required. 1 50' 40' ; curbs ( required B. Additional requirements fa1"lz r cfel,4<t"Cgi:Fig may be placed as conditions =, of site develfl'me t review [for-t uc�� traffic Ord, 89-06 [mil p 3 - ( ' Ord. 84-29; Ord. 83-52) 18 108.090 Width and Location of Curb Cuts i s A. [T-kke; i e]Curb cut - (sta" ) shall be in accordance with Subsection 18. 164.030.N. (^i___ -cticna of each atrc2-t and rclatcd 3tandarc3 - - . _- _ 6.154.030.Z. ] (Ord. 89-06; Ord. s3-52) 18. 108.100 One-Way Vehicular Access Points A. Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow 611. on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming to traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) D-7 1: g fi F "� s 4 { � "u :_-,:' ',„:=-4;,.4-' d1. :'. . . . D RS P 5^9-93 18.108.110 Director's Authority to Restrict or Require Coordination of 41 . Access [• ] •J q A. ' In order to provide for-increased traffic movement on * congested = streets .and to eliminate turning movement problems, the Director may ;: restrict 'the..location. of driveways on [the] stree5d and require the ' 'location' of"•driveways be placed on-adjacent streets] upon-the finding { that the proposed access would: 1. Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions;' or • 2. . Provide inadequate acres ..for,emergency vehicles; or 4,. - 3. Cause' hazardous ,conditions''to exist which would constitute a. �P ;: clear and present danger to the public health,- safety, ' and ...;,..,,,,4,.-0,,,,, , general welfare. - A < . ..... . : ......: ..... ......::.:.:... .. v:.:.:.. v:nwv:rri::.}.vv:: ayv.-rte. :..in �.y .. �...}...J::In..-�:or3r;:;:;to :e1;�:�1 ' - Le...the>:,_.eed ,.�s >use : �$1..��.:.ttstreets�Yf•;oi:�>>� �re�•. ..._t.,.,....-, .:.,. ,.{4J:an.:.:v ..............w r;: ::::: .:+.. : J. ;jj•:i}t;4$i}.::.:::•{8}.r.;i:!} ...:.t ... :. ,. .::.,:...;{t;rt.:;:{:;::):'.}.. .::iJ'r:)}t ne S eTEt.. `su ercia1% ndt •:oa'ert3e•s :a � Z?tLF'%'%d ews%y5b• '& bd . fir.. 4: t: . :{. .V::nv::•;:?J r..r:::vv.v{:w:.,...t:.v:r:v•t.: . . de�3gne�:.:to:<:conneL�� �xi�h��par��a :areas:<�on;ad�acerft.J.0 ©pert.' es� less -... .:...... ...... ............. ., ..v:n:r.•:::v:;.-....vn,w.v;.., :.:.:. ::.. :..:.J:::.}:: _{ rtaf:.,.:J.feaslb_es.� tr�he:{:v.U .actar<«;she�?�:,; ess:-::r:ea -;g1a-.-61-4:tn:oetederi .. 1 .:. ..., :. J.::.:- .::r.,'f.:i::{?•i}'•. v. .v:. ... :..•-.:::•v-n:,-i:, ::K»i. w+F4"r;?{-r{:.:;..,.:;;i;;•?r:vr::;-:r:{-:r:4:•:}J}iJ:it•- sf.-•mvrtnr.5� pro a s. where necessary t o�cogrxde.� o ,CIA 4area. �eca6nsi r .nv�v..::::nvw: 7;... -:''''.;;;7::': c iiti: :order Y•ta•::faiil.Itate 39t edess •?.an<.Y.a..d•,tb�..'•. . 3 e{ atraff r r-•- :.:e'ccess: an3 .. .,..-..„,7. 4;Y-,. ,..^::;:%.?%. .:. }'/l.:i.4y{..}•i;.}:t4.».n;.}':.;;.;r;:;.Y.'!.•}} J}:{-}-::..}r...r:..vr'v:'rrv:vvtf:;3•:-�4r ,4:N:-r:4}nv:::::'J}:J'v"::r-%'4:YYVrIFi".�4'{;r:'Y.t:vr, rWN--:{.ri-Y{r0't.r�.. :r.YxC:/. Ok!�-:.1. -. t .v .:n: w}.....{SJ;,.. hj ..t? -•( v:� pr}..r .rf...dU:Y!. +�q +•�.:'J[.S J}.. f�:f$:":i•Vr. :;;� "P�r h tf::area•::.:�s2ains``gfaill . r v'ide�.r�ftfitai ifekls> r2::s�:a0 }ands.,Qv,{t athw $ a ... ,..� • ....::.. ....-::�};{::.:.•r::- :-::.r:::::.;::.:}..:.{;;;^: . - ;.::;.. �.....,t{s:::.,.}.;:::;.}}}x4;" :�c{�.. •..xnnuGx:•.;.:•x:::.}}4 '• :a :.:{;:,•};:ter:4w:;.r' '::o:;• :r-: 4n3?eGt3t3i3S a feas�b3e`<:' eween ?1e hrdee=oentssr land ..' y ...,..: �.............. .. ..... ... .............:......:..,,... ....,.,, ...« ...... .....:....... uses t ' 31 D. '..A decision by the Director. may be 'appealed to the Co issi on as 3' ' provided by Subsection 18 .32 . 310.A Procedures for Decision Macingi T - � Quasi-Judicial. (Ora. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) ., ! i 18 . 108. 120 Variances to rccess. Standards r . . A In all zoning districts where access and egress drives- cannot be readily designed. to:conform to Code standards within . a particular parcel, access with an adjoining property shall be {eel- ] ®° considered If access In 'confianotson with another; -Darrel cannot 6ce rodeo»abler be achieved, -t e Director array.• grant a variance to the access requirements of this chapter based on the standards set forth { in Section 18. 108. 150. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) ' 18. 108.130 Administration and Approval Process W ., A. The applicant [e€] for an access'variance shall be the recorded owner ,..�` :_: of the affected property or an agent authorized in writing by the ' - owner. 1 • B. A preapplication conference. with City -staff is ` required.' [ (Sc= r D-8 1.i'''5.':::-(: ',,2..Yt � r �S. '•r r.. �� . i. � )` S Z �i t - 4?: 1 r:. r ,x ♦T t ". DRAFT 5-9-93' . o: • • • • a. e o e > s • • e • • • e y , F 3 Scot.ion 13.3-2.040.1.) C. Due to possible changes in state statutes, or regional or local policy, information given by staff to the applicant during the preapplication conference is valid for not more than six months 1e Another preapplication conference is required if € ..te -t .eettt.e] >F application is submitted six ` Y months after the preapplicaton conference; and' a -r 2. Failure of the Director to provide any of the information required by this chapter shall not constitute a waiver of the r standard, criteria, or• recluiremente of the applications. ,, - :::::4-',.. D. The Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny any , application for a ( ] aoc �vv-a c`e e The Director 4'4-'- '',.!.,*: shall apply the standards set forth-in Section [1.0 e 140] <i 50 when reviewing an application for fa temporar • ux] geaggS °� ^�' v7,4r11nr .1:--!.:,:i.t..:',ii".',.:1..:..:''' E. The decision of the Director may be appealed in accordance with <1 Subsection 1'. 32.310.A. .k # ' F. The Director shall mail notice of the decision to tine persons who are -4'. ,* . a ` entitled to notice in accordance with Section 18.32, 120. (Ord. .89-06; Ord. 83-52) ",:: 18. 108.140 Ex•i_at .on of A•.roval: Standards for Extension of Time a A. An access variance approval by the Director shall lapse if ' '{;' 7 . Substantial construction of the approved plan has not begun a Within a one-and-one-half-year period, or { 2. Construction of the site is a departure from the approved plan. B. The Director shall, upon written request by the applicant and payment iii. ., of the required fee, grant an extension of the approval period not to s ? SZ exceed one year, provided that: Tc. L 1. No changes are made on the original access variance plan as i approved by the Director;' 2. The applicant can show positive steps have been taken to initiate construction of the site within the (cu.)c month] one `. ` '' S. year extension period; and 3. .There have been no substantial changes '`in . the. facts or ` y i D-9 a t :s. ,.i Y E 3:.' 4 ' ''. .'. .iI 1 a ', A ., 1.+Y 4. :,- i.; \. +1't +'; ,l , .s Y ...i ^ • DRAFTS-9-98 • applicable policies and ordinance provisions on which the approval was based. C. The decision of the Director may be appealed as provided-by Subsection 18.32.310.A. No notice of the Director's . decision need be given. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 38.18.150 Approval Standards ■ A. The Director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny..a request r for an access variance based on findings that: 1• It is not possible to share access; 2. There are no other alternative access points on the 'street in question or from another street, 3. The access separation requirements cannot be met; 4. The request is the minimum variance required to provide adequate access; 5. The approved access or access approved with conditir_'s will result in a safe access; and 6. The visual clearance requirements of- Chapter 1.8. 102 will be met. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) $ 18 108. 160 Application Submission Requirements A. All applications shall be made on forms provided by the Director and shall be accompanied by 1t . .' 1. Copies (for rc-.•ic;. by the.Airc�ar j of site an{1" s) (number to P be determined at the preapplication conference) , and necessary a• data -or narrative which explains how the access variance proposal conforms to the standards: F a. The site plan(s) drawings shall be drawn on sheets preferably not exceeding 18 inches by 24 inches; and .g' b. The scale shall be an engineering scale. ' [ ; and • D-10 11 1 '....,.:'....:,',......ii.,,,,:,,......::: '' ,, . '.,.. . ' ',- ,,, - , , ,, ,, . ,. ,DRAFT" 5°933 a- .a ^ l[C inchcs;: i , } _. - - _ - ho arc `' 3] ,, The required fee: B. The proposed access variance site plan shall include the following ,. r a�nf orrsatean: _�:'¢• I. The ('- - , ] section, tcwnsh p, range ,and tax lot number; , . -:;,..,........L,...,,,.,::,....,,,,;..-. 2. The relationship of the lot to ,the` road`" system; Y 3. The location of access points on adjoining lots and on the t: lots across the street; �h,J. , .., The location and setback of structures and oar Ting" 'areas on a the lot and on the adjoining ]ots; _. :.......*,;/7..,,:::-,.,. 5. The location of the proposed access, and i } a .r � ��.' - , o. The [ ] s"�gh`t distances from the proposed. access point. : �- (Ord. 89-06; Ord. .83-52) {f E7 her.: r nat�81a `as at-`r vbe< c� erred =nGessary • *' _ a' $".��'"LGtt?r — =o evaluate <the :.r.-- .tet: 1 - r. u 1 a Fpp nn 1 , 11 f r1i .a ■ • r;>•:,.-'-'1.', ..-''''-'*..'''''.ii t P e r ft.r .i j t s d, i mss { i.K 1, t , • j NOT INCLUDED IN THIS PACKET SECTICt E relates to transit access and building orientation. These change., will be considered at a later date. Staff was waiting for completion of the Metro study, Tcans station planning. Rule Implementation Re ona1 Guidelines, which is included 3s: this information packet. • • • er — } Rage E-1 • d D RAFT 6-1493 m a ` Language to be added is underlined 9 Language to be deleted is [ ibrackots] 4-"- Chapter 18.164 STIUSET AND UTILITY STUAIDARDS Sections: %-'," 18.164.0.10 Purpose - 18.164.020 General Provisions 18.164.030 Streets 18.164.040 Blocks 18.164.050 Easements y 18.164.060 Lots 18.164.070 Sidewalks ,,; 18.164.080 Public Use Areas 18.164.090 Sanitary Sewers 18.164.100 Storm Drainage 18.164.110 Bikeways 18. 164.120 Utilities , 13.164.130 Cash or Bond Required 18.164.140 Monuments 18.164.150 Installation: Prerequisite/Permit Pee 18.164,160 Installation: Conformation Required , 18. 164 170 Plan Checking Required .:; 18. 164 .180 Notice of City Required R 18.164 . 190 City Inspection Required 18.164.200 Engineer's Certification Required 18.164.010 Purpose f..•.,.z ,z. A. The purpose of this chapter is to provide construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and- utilities ii such as streets, sewers, and drainage. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 18.164.020 General Provisions A. Unless otherwise provided, the standard specifications for ` construction, reconstruction or repair of streets, sidewalks, curbs' and other public improvements within the City shall Occur .'in 0 ;' accordance with the standards of this title. IU • 411 4 • DRe0. FT6-1493 B. The City Engineer may recommend changes or supplements to the standard specifications consistent with the application of engineering principles..' -3 The provision of Section 7.40 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply to this chapter. (Ord. 89-426; Ord. 83-52) 18.164.030 Streets s n A. Improvements 1. No development shall occur unless the development has frontage i ..`. or approved access to a public street: a. Streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with this title; b. Any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an [ p ed] egi.stin street [plan] shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with this code; and c The Director may accept a future improvement guarantee in lieu of street improvements if one or more of the following conditions exist: I 1 (i) A partial improvement is not feasible due to the inability to achieve proper( ] design standards; (ii) A partial improvement may create a potential safety hazard to motorists or pedestrians; (iii) Due to the nature of existing development on adjacent properties it is unlikely that street improvements would be extended in the foreseeable future and the Improvement associated with the project under review does not, by itself, provide a significant improvement to street . safety or capacity; • (iv) The improvement would be in conflict with an adopted capital improvement plan; k. (v) The improvement is associated with an approved land partition on property zoned residential and the proposed land partition does not create any new streets; or • F-2 ka.- - DRAFT 6-14-93' 1. (vi) Additional planning work is required to define the � appropriate design standards for the street and the application is for a project ,which would contribute } ` only a minor portion of the anticipated future traffic on the street. B. Creation of Rights-of-way for Streets and Related Purposes 1. Rights-of-way shall be created through the approval of a final -' subdivision plat or major Partition; however, the Council may approve the creation of a street by acceptance of a deed, provided that such street is deemed essential`by the :Council *. for the purpose of general traffic circulation: a. The Council may approve the creation of a street by deed of dedication without Ball compliance with the regulations ; applicable to subdivisions or major partitions if any one or more of the following conditions are found by the Council to be present:` ; (i) Establishment of a street is initiated by the Council and is found to be essential for the purpose of general traffic -circulation, and • partitioning [•e ]QQ subdivision of land has an incidental effect rather than being the primary s: objective in establishing the road or street for public use, (e )6 d ; (ii) The tract in which the road or street is to be • ; L dedicated is an isolated ownership of one acre :or , less and such dedication is recommended by the commission to the Council_ based on a finding that the proposal is not an attempt to evade the provisions of this title governing the control of subdivisions or major partitions; b With each application for approval of a road or street right-of-way not in full compliance with the regulations applicable to the standards, the proposed dedication shall be made a condition of subdivision and major partition ix approval: (i) The applicant shall submit such additional information and justification as may be necessary ra to enable the Commission in its review to determine whether or not a recommendation for- approval by the tUJI ? Council shall be made; , 411 410, h • n i . DRAFT614-93 4{ (ii) The recommendation, if any, shall be based upon a finding that the proposal is not in conflict with the purpose of this title; (iii) The Commission in submitting the proposal with a recommendation to the Counoil may attach conditions which are necessary to preserve the standards of this title, and 11 Gg [ (iv)] All deeds of dedication shall be in a form prescribed by the City and shall name [,°thc City of Tigard, Oregon" or] "the public," ' [wkagmDw51!--the t ' ]x ae1. grantee. C. Creation of Access Easements: 1.+ The approval authority may approve an access easement I b , established by deed without full compliance with this title provided such an easement is the only reasonable method by which a lot large enough to develop can [develo P1 be created: a. Access easements which exceed 150 feet shall be improved in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code Section 10.207; be Access shall be in accordance with Sections 18.108.070 and i' 38..108.080 - D. Street Location, Width and Grade: 3. The location, width and grade of all streets shall conform to an approved street plan and shall be considered in their relation to existing and planned streets, to topographic conditions, to public convenience and safety, and in their appropriate relation to the proposed use of the land to be served by such streets: a. Street grades Y shall ,be approved by the ( �-- - � �,-� C t. ,,... . an�rer in accordance with Subsection X below; and b. Where the location of a street is not shown in an approved street plan, the arrangement of streets in a development } - shall either: ram (1) Provide for ' the continuation . or appropriate -e projection of existing streets in the surrounding areas, or * • F- J Y _ +J i".A Y xj J •1 + ',} - ;a. ,,,,,•.-' . . , . . . . . . . . DRAFT 9-8-93 . . . . . . . 4 : ` (ii) Conform to a plan adopted by the [Council] :. s�.�...► if it is impractical to ,t , conform to existing street patterns because of - particular topographical or other existing ' conditions of the land. Such a plan shall be based on the type of land use to be served, the volume of ;' ` ' traffic, the capacity of adjoining streets and the need for public convenience and safety. ;.'7,4.. .';'....L:-.;;. E. ' Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths a } w w'Y arp1. Unless otherwise indicated on an ap roved street plan, oias fi+Z j d EgK � ♦ r— -.' N.2 ih µM . t, [the) street r ght o -tayand-roa w ai hs 5r_ r od _beY less than the • minimum width described below [-feee e �'f ] . Where a range is indicated, the width shall be determined by the 1 Sdt �.sa MEaff�>nzr tIa h �tv tbaae"d .l' > YI/}.:y':➢'^,S(' .S::KK '':..:aar,^:,.�.",l.�:o;!£�:»;;7.•::;. ^Yn..,�>,-r ::�F:` 'SrN:: •,;.,. u�StB� .. a tx iTri:I£: e- %.:ti:_ oe anti �`:l't`g t M `'S -* t.,..t::.s:,;::..,,-,1.:::.,.:,,:t; � A ����:� Ada �cn x�a >netat tr�e� • a; Mct c: �.h�4Yf/`,'/�v7L/•.:.v,:.{9 ia-t:v',yN.L t:+lv:7tit v 43'�..l.'3{:r.y5a � Ytad ophfi> YS O�.�t � 3�F r ��S 3.LaT2 . yy.�y.ya, :.:a•. :a:a:F:n ..w.<a,aw:. ::�;�r•::,:.:g;,.::;_:::p.ry.• ;rY°• . CJt QEL4li2].<l7£ A�itic•w.vll5:��'J.Z:��l's'�::: - `�f,29" '�'7��v .tts,..consr.�uct�c'n >r.a ~ 7. {.{. ...r......r....rfJ.Ai:'.:ij�ix,..;:;r,.,}f..j}�"K:�yta:tKy r::::.^.y:ti.;••, .i, 2,./ 2 3 T ghEg a gatfig desx rstandar'ds:< ?ii l .nr v de..aauldanceefor v a , .. ....;.:::..:ex .:::•:x.,.....,r.•t>c::..r..:.:ay:: a.u.. �' 7 �t;;,::3;�;?!;�t� .a..,�.-._a.�•• "' �2���'12 t�.3iist'7° �S9'3t�Y�33 •:Li4�>. ::°i3?e�`�x�LC ranges (:. In Developing Arm s: ) [Minimum) [Minimum) Right-of-way Roadway Moving Tvb.e of Street Width (feet) Width (fee_) Lanes c r t arterial 60-90 12 ' /_are 2-- . < , ,y Major Collector 60-80 44 ' 2-- t A; t ;Minor Collector 60 40' 2-3 Local Street-Coerca 50 34 ' 2 . IndustrIel J 6 : i•- i Local Streets `- Residential•,, 44 50 28-32 2 • to Sub ColIectfor [Local St_ccta � ' "cm ' Residential Access's Streets ,,: J -... ......... .... r4 a::::: Throuah :street:.w th 40;-46 24-28 -2 a 14Ss than :5: 0 Ap r. xA $w F- ii a: . A ! Z DRAFT 6-14-93 k Cul-de-sac dead-end (5,0]86i44 (W] 428 '- Z streets, (not mere r. than 400° long a�iE :, 4 mtys� rax • h,$r Y{650•rY K QM.Y•»>'+i A Y {vp-�; ,wrn„r,,n„rxr.,.�,� Turn-grounds for c e"a"d=end 500 radius 42° radius streets in . ri 4c Mg '4,° 4 9 O 5n q� ^fPy J'�6 Y �y�rr ,4'.�r �i-'•, ,�Y ,,fit'Y y,+ ,4 f <b2i-°�$ i� La 6 Y jtr•¢' �5•Yt � ,� t�[.e. •� '�O�YC - :•yT C>i1 '� ,.3� y+,wmw >rrr-:b •a'c4y6 0�rr r}w a. ..... ..... .... Y• h •,ri)i t: t VfV nrm�xnvi.»wnmrm»vrv.�+nw+n„wvvmF,�•�S • AfyrxA�akfi"i ,-. { Alley: Residential(T) (G) (2-641Ta Business or Industrial 20 20' \'•,�' !:��� �'.sx>kNKd4+yW5?el' , �•o�`1f4 vi it�>t95 tM5ib5«"r9 - }'�VJ'`� t� { GT: .fCt} ... s aty C S • ..„,. ,G S5 t# T zi ♦...Vii. ' m:}..., .f•.<}v{y.Yw ,Q.WV{' ::rnvyy•. .y.�':�:•eYr•.CrY.•iYyrFS�,y�y?,yWAa?fh�lig,�%.+j',.�,,${Si:I..F.Si,,pa':�,v�x:.r..;,r.}!��„�:'L..:...y4{uw�.>x�a,;r�'#;:>.r:i>:ft:�ny4/,a�n>kh4»;a.,j'.:fq.�@x,}{tqx{ .v+•,,a �f1Z•114, 3:tiJ-{L �1►L1 S �i•i.ii��vj.J�a16 f'•"�i� jr vS:V[•'i}d i:v:�.-,+r:.{t....,}8{,i�•.Yel-n;:,J.'.r:YiY:r4Y(:J}Y,ritw Yitf•�Ny�y{�^.,i� !!{.K/:%4J:,.yvY{:,.Jyi•xer,`. t\'Qi(rr 4{+/,h}` •{.} .ii.-i�4>rJ:j;i •:;l.,n' o ..,tom<:AdMER s> N -YCG• +u . s�f iix>� %�s 9Ai&A SE .:.1.,.' �....::.v::•i}>}• ¢...1..4{:.f4{%j::J:{:i.;{t�?.v::i4$Y�"t:}JJJ:.i>JI•:f4T>K.JY'.'QY•>J>%•:{j'::rci{G'::i:vj::.{v f: vK•:'}:"1Q:Qk:>:ir..:.:{i c evelo a nen fgEbgEd{ 5Hg c erat�.onrr r .:; figME& 1 t3ii6 ..�.}1". ..........r r::{:"x?b>Jif>y:..rn>-:+N>}J,'Ct'T:�.vV4.i.agf!f.ty ��:�.+-..`J+..,jJ:t},f,.v{•ntW4wF.>Q;v':vi/.{,.:, ->tQKr:;:;:;i!:•{i is {}•i•J+.i '+{aik'k }; r,!s �>, x,32:•.... �rdt !4.rZ'a5•. : MIL ';Yv: 3 'eR� '. ks.'� '£?#kL* i�?3`t� .}_,i�7`Ee�3 . {Y{f.Jk: .QJK•:rri+-x.s roA lassJaia �r` +> tt. y}„ � 4� :.S h J. f Y t ,i f az Ar3tacat�ated.>;ktrai> yfiU�geYreraETan,1 on street Bar]c .Taiaeeeas. .` ( ). Sidewalk and.{bikewa: r..:reausrements (v} Reau re�rtents. fbr�p3�cez ent of..• til Mies s .. : .: •tv •�> Street l.aght3<ng. ('VIA) Orainarte slope. �mtaacrs,: �, >y h v v .� l `>4 � xr ^,4,. f 14 Flantanc�Aanag. .ainasa eY!axeas. 4 h/` 'ff: �,�Z wr>i yv \�YiP' +yh R'^f r .l kr� (x1 Satet�t fili�,ilSEorrssts {�xzaa rc� s �ana4 nedestrsa�ast�< F.: .,,..r....r..r...,.,»....,�r....r».r.,,,r r.r.....1.1... ...1........,.,1.1.. ., rr....r......... t ro { v> T. q:>:a`y^_ JJ r•, t J tit fx� Pccess fneedsi aremer �Yv �reh�c.le s b. Tr, f ti i41,, 0]i■ 1 , ('' „ .•., ...., :,...„....,..,,,:.,--..- . „...,....,,,,..„,.._.„. . . . .. . . . . . . • . • . DRAFT 12-29-93 _ - - '' - tcd H. f®j.•- `�/T 1 1 tie to ` B '.1• a 4 Y{'s a 1 e t a ,n_fir a a B ' . 4. iGai'a x „ .c a "n _• i.... .4'''': �o a Sib.? f a � x s}:�p].. xr}t 4. a •xt n?3 'u� 0#-?Xt ?^ a ic' :s .....• .T,i ,riN'•'V._.,,{ .'''", �{4 r k.' '-'mMx K�, ,cp�Lz� ^•"iby.Y,t x ^y^ a{ _ er y o'4 l ud4 S bL f c 5 x 4.*-21,....-„_.....,....,,,t 3 o ' :•• . r•.:4, v 4° n"i x us ♦c Y M h iyl G ; ' ya e::aI :, v t ?. «^Y a 3 , . f t - i f S x a t xu,# r r`�x w °Y y,. ] 2F4-7a.,€3, o fr 3 f r r P.a fa[ *t a,-:w/ra� ; ;t1.. Y: S F^ : t£s,ie w i rf 3 t « rte� E { �c � 5. n'^'e"'--.-t,, �., i - 4 In"' r i ' r � w - ` : z° '0'...:0:v4 Sl SS'i r4 `C�e✓ ..4, " ...wR' q"C'yf•€:..-`` .0:r:" ..0 a a ul $`'"u , �� ^ d ' z4' "0< ^ 4)§1+ 1� , 5 r Aj •3 t t a, n a,:e o2 aC`, ..,sys - - a� 'x. ersyvy,+out Tt a +oec � -------. ----"-• ....... r { � 61� YGi,.Og b�Y al 7S Y .^4 4 \e Fi G 't� :-+E r�w•:.y anus, y ..-x...: Atit .::Exte33surd ofas. r o,:.:...' , c 4 :...:X, i \y�W'Nom R •f?1 Hi!•f r{S ? wry...+ ,.•1 ! i f :]. •ti'itila���?t:'�.Jtr el..v]':ti � �.. it�+'j.. : eNyfT'Y{]. }Y sr < ^?7",a"f";']T`"y,�4{ - {{ '..... jaK'•t > {a {.. Ll . ' Serif f.�r.edz�.;' r}.�: ;f 60} .f S . MME zco unc* L•o 'w to fan F 1'' '•T.• ....,. %:+,{M:{{i�''�••r:.S}Y.{i M�-7,.,,{}{.�vvl T..f� j'}+:h\S{t^ ) •?JM+Y+ wY.9CX.•�Y{ry .n{4�v 1.{wl..{.;:.LJp.p.\ %:.:{:k•}Y{•viN{,:'A';ta..ni f. QyR }. L {n a 3. : a•S:at`on•Y,. {:oi f °°:g ,i.?s •n:;? kig o.:zt t aila 4,�er 1..an 3r• 'r r� Yyl kr "+{rr}'aC-a {.•:,y'C7da <i.`.r ,e•d.'s" n� v••:•c: io:;:•. ��?� ¢.'x z�� � ' �:�•a�c��:zs:' � S3bsec� +� .f .v-{.w..(!??�.x•vmJ+�\•n%Y.M.•.'Y r.� --'TY,Y!Jf�HFq':J^Y%v,;[Y.:{...w. �,....}%{:{?t{-1,:{:MM�f.^;Y•:{f... ri:{{p>tin...;.�•�:w'f�';YC4J i:::.•{,ay..:\LJy'. dfrez iEthi •s, a•r,\se at~ the, :ir Q psedv d.Ja1+1s�.on r �: .t�C.y',,�d�''. �KOy' fi',v.x,. { L':eec:u•@`Ey'Yo is w:�s Y;{ !.r +,re{-:xq+-!'�:''r.... a f1i1{•t",ce!�/�/y<,�; b+-�'^,bcy+'�Lj�. .ilarii..` N:Ir, v�:�/'? 6 fl4" "i ..e�.x'd.. 5 i,�.IDr`��`; 4+'4 19:3.-1 t'4.�}":RG:i30T�:3..: �..�.G E: . ,• >}}%e s:aYLU�?4�xs•{d" ..�rii onccn ,p�'2T c 4cJ.r , a{:a,�c-x6,:w:r-»Y;y�CM Tr %S •.%;y.J�...}]}T»:a,v.,xJy; '."i.$ ti 8.m.. a T..' w a..'.a�' a 0 .::;-11:ag Kt .iacy" eS,'#g�.'•rcy...-. 'Y�:�':i x.'•4t a4`i a si .' .: ...{ti{o�.:fr-{.Y.:t%k-Yti:•`.?r..!•.,i:- \T.�, '�r.U:.pp.Jrf�r,yjJll . : ••i;•<i'<;.'::.... {:,,-.....fa.<r,.?::rr]::f•.:;xy: { P�t�����v ��,1�: ���s�rSJr� �Q''�����fi<`� �?��:����' a�,s� .�<<••.imrepara:t a :»{::u:,}a,T:- , t, -:.y,; .+f-.} .4c6:`c2.T.{nf ;>% :rT�ax:.: gs�,�s .Q$ }::TT/}�..'s}} masse% qY�> /.1 Ti\ Asa' ,.:mth; .3,e'C. i•. h :I:< G4k...�ti"GGa�..:'fJ, n ' •..0%`'.'{.4T K .i modified> ' ..when. .subse e 'ent.na subd i va�sian nf000sa'� are subTu .t-ted• a ! {v b dntif exgsta:- .c -z - roaoSed is ro ses Tu outs or t;a o hgr: .tra tvErta a.t es> Y b :ta reiut and. ' edes ian }:u:4 .v(x ::;'1''r}%•%4<,Yt,%Jaxf�c:{:;af:- x•.'. :}:;c;- :;y;.• .;,}xo f fac�.liti-eslron ox u . $€ir.K-gfe' of the sgte 2. [.l--Where necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future .41 !-.,,..*:,,::."-..',.. division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended tc the boundary lines of the tract to be developed, 'and[: i a. [A rescric strip across the c d of a and.icz. cd .,--c,,,.. _ }:: _, y - i �hese: :ex�' et�»:>st.Y�e�s ct � c^as rrss ra t \T y\y C W7 d;A\ S^y^ 4-Y ?T �-ar,; 4:a avu•\�_ {a •: {J}r•.:; {M ;,; nix: . or`La$str•F� lgrabs-. -CA a rraite o Arauertxes:larQ{\2 a coh,Sid�: 'ed .s,.. .{ .. `.-i} \.S{K a:•].Lf,r N : Y^•fta { y c ,i»t \r�„ +,r{ ,,,, :a:st .g,",4#- ?;•::J: st-'r.r. {a 4.: .}+.]c 35c-r. .v\• tf { 4. 4 , 'Y:.K-:,. .}:;r. ..{::ffa%�J]}}x•+T} !.\Q-!:{:'Y n.A 4:i :0^•+tp ::i},TC4tirt v'}rv?,M1�: r.2:�n rC'::{rnv.:..?!C{..i :f.} .. • a � .r t u\°b`.\fs Bees`. +`fc gisel tta;�er�as etig ad cans • 0000e#ct /Ys t'� ceveloped`\ ti' b. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until • {i Y F-! �r i • • • • • • • • • • • . :a, . authorized by the city Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. s t o eac�. er ea out em e -1 bx 1b0<s gai* be.,.cosnstetiated for..:.st tb.r:street .excess..sil f'rkt r '.fr,*ngh G. Street Align ment[l-]mod`% on�ie}ctn ons t 1. [A3 far - - - - ; •: -: - _ - : th cxisting- str • . . -ee • 4 _ _h , the) [°')Staggering ••1: of streets making "T" intersections at collectors and arterials ;i.7,;;;:'..:';.-,,,,;„ [ire—dc3igncd that]s ial3> not be designed£ sr that jogs of , ` ' less than 300 feet on such"'streets'• are •.created., as measured from the centerline of such street• Minimum separa.t _a ko 125 y fee's .............. , ,. be�.ween ��cGa�> 'street ante cpcts:oas is reco�it��ridecy .:.:`,.... 2. Ali local. and mipor cQl .ects„r streets th ch a ut 4 de e�.okiie�'►t sate `shall . {°{extended within the'} s to tta'..xiroisae..k. raixc fii • eve..-: >2� .,.. }}a ..< a ,:;�`:>;+.}o, �.� ..;,. tai a nt�t.:::. ,sglurled e. '�'i.rt�#�tst�"{ °"}'�....,. Mt�r ?{.:n},•.; v;. G:}%}}} h h..y.\ :;.}}}}t{¢-1-v.•:.v'{:y;.}}>:.n..-�};! -.;}v. ..:{.w:v,:ti{vit!:-:r.,. ,..t�.. a� ..r nw knpcs I >cc traa,nts, 3.�*xa.t�nc�r eve vent ___ a _s> : ,. ,_ ,., str --' d.i„ `exxier tco �other:> staufder-t e:: in... s{> :t `. i..<.stree• �y,c fie. A �[ y� •!� /�/�ry� /��ry w� yYA Y. .} .:• .i•::-:.,• q/� ^i �n��t��Si':}y�3:•\•:p �n►l.��l'S}}::is.':.L VdLs'�KG��"�.�iF Q.L..6:c14a��C'�:�•/�hG�':i1:�4�•\4}��h.Y iNJ a. l. .•..<•.c33'' a"eG�?#3f3 14:;-::S1IE`:a• �� �#>r'a;cdt:� < >'�f3 re - ed}:}{extenswons.>... Tri..the ;ease:<:of.:. n ro enter {�{ter pro�a .'e>{ . , . .. � ,,,,_ h� 3nex-e resen ,3:. no't::>,,}}suf:::>: ..::; ...::•: ;: > ::r':< � s:..:'::: .;::.,::;..;. .. .: �e rte:;}:< a3rts�'r.��nt{;<�a . . . #�.a.caent to shy .that a street_.<cr��r�edt�an>>;>>>�s:�:::;:no S• e,.::.::::. . e..a �.�... nt::.:mus•t`��o;� `�ah •;,$he'{:;cQns:�i- . a-alp:.:. •ecl:�3c3 gaiRON a°soria ala str:eet:..donnectiafi J,\ 3 Pro ued• ,st*ee-;for �_s?tkeet iex nsionc .shall;$ 3 e>> l.ocaiced.....tss .. \, .. ei' :s�„ �13z��'. ...i��t .�:>t��`{y: �.���'ed....i� `���<'�-�}s.. ' ' ,v:• '•' :�.W^^YM:':•}.\v,..v»"wi:;vp.:n+':y-.1rtt•:{l ..v. :{,q f.{,;ny}y{:-:;en- \ is>},:yj;:;;:.v.' f f ...� t�th+erg>ne>3:�hb�s�hco�t^:�a <��ss�: : «centers .�;:�•sur�b`����Ys�c '.'`.�3s sh{:,>::v��rics e \i fICIM � P0 1t > •: i:-i }-'A 1 { j yyyy® t . w , conrmetin.nt, eet�Ntaat .nzn �zes v trveVdis : bn} es ;} .Sh\Y>m'>th:X e •1,0 d�v �r 1�te»; H. Intersection Angles: ,;. ti • 0 1. Streets shall be laid out so as to intersect at an angle as . near to a right angle as practicable, except where topography requires a lesser angle, but in no case shall the angle be less •' than 60° unless there is special intersection design, and: ' F.8 ",'.; ys . •. • . • • • • • e a • • D R A F i 6-14-93 . . • • • • . . . a. Streets shaill, have at least 25 feet of tangent adjacent to the right-of-way intersection unless topography requires a lesser distance; b. Intersections which are not at right angles shall have a r minimum corner radius of 20 feet along the right-of-way :: :. lines of the acute angle; and c. Right-of-way lines at intersection with arterial streets l-r,"''' shall have a corner radius of not less than 20 feet. 1 ,.:, I. Existing Rights-of-Way; • ° 1. Whenever existing rights-of-way adjacent to or within a tract are of less than standard width, additional rights-of-way shall ` be provided at the time of subdivision or development. J. Partial Street Improvements: 3 Y 1. Partial street improvements resulting in a pavement width of less than [2-4]2Q feet; while generally not acceptable, may be approved where essential to reasonable development when in `: conformity with the other requirements of these regulations, a i and when it will be practical to require the improvement of the other half when the adjoining property developed. 1° K. Culs-de-sac° !• !-: • ' ' 1. A cul-de-sac shall [e -a-s—s e t as possible and shall in no , �] be no more than 400 feet long nog- .. rroxx e'v: 09ss- :cs c neater than 2O dweilIng units: a. All cull-de sac shall terminate with a (circular]f x .• < turnaround[i].•:Else o£t . arund ctnfac atigxis��.t ext a �, circular :shall, be ap raved€ by tne}f t ?ng neer:and ,,t b. The length of the cul-de-sac shall be measured along the centerline of the roadway from the near side of the t intersecting street to the farthest point of the., • !..,.% .. ;< to .. '. `Gy4 • ': i,, ,, de—�T ... r } o 'G \ 9 -� 4`fy4 jG ; .. ....... �.w:x:n y� w.,-.:.:::w:v•:.:.v::nvnv::::•�.v:::-:.v:.:w:r:..:r. ,n:.N:...r.v;:{:•....n,w.:,-.:v.}::?Ti}:��xr?: v:}:'}}}.4`Y��i:"S:G.,,: -.4}!.•}:ti:•%4Y:v6'}":M.' .......nv:n'Tv: .``•::`r>':...,...,. ..., ,`{.. .�-4Y...;`9 vIf.•' �f. Yf a•i:.V':Y-g.ab {�' athwa :,,:-to an..:.ad.:.acent..:�te ?t. ta.. .... :. 3r gyp/ } F-9 . a- � . -..".4 1: ', ..... .. . . r,. Ar'4,.. a 7t .. .. .br 4, ;' A .'. . ... • . •y w • a • • w. .• -• o, a • o. o D..R A. F T 6-14°93 • o a -• o o • • L. Street Names: 1. No street name shall be used which will duplicate or be confused with the names of existing streets in Washington •y, County, except for extensions of existing streets. . Street names and numbers shall conform to the established pattern in the surrounding area. M. Grades and Curves: `,• 1. Grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12 percent on collector streets, or 12 vpercnt on any other street cg )v':ii0ytx:r:r'e:;iy.:,.:^.!ran;�,{rA < FrO.::ilro:.,n}r.,•r} that local Fr: s deM j t abc s� eets >ma f.°.ha crre .s :d ents t t :.::...:..:. y,•::•, / •, '•f,,., :;q{ ::..••' , 3' . � . ; yyy k. '. \! {4:.. $•fd�iJ•:}' <:• e C . $•g p ?S4�r� Y,a :'�S; �..: e__ Y :iy'•}:i}.y•:k:.....x{.:,{,,:.1r:+%}av�v,:. t• ..?.. iLY+' i°'L•:• feet# , and a. Centerline radii of curves shall not be less than 700 feet on arterials, 500 feet on major collectors, 350 feet on minor collectors, or 100 feet on other streets; and b. Streets intersecting with a minor collector or greater functional classification street, or streets intended to be posted with a stop sign or signalization, shall provide a landing averaging five percent or less. Landings are that portion of the street within 20 feet of the edge of the intersecting street at full improvement. N. Curbs, Curb Cuts, Ramps, and Driveway Approaches: 3. Concrete [vertical] curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080, and: a. Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except b. Where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may I constructed with City Engineer approval; and c. Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. 0. Streets Adjacent to Railroad Right-of-Way. 1. Wherever the proposed development contains or is adjacent to a railroad right-of-way, provision shall be made for a ,street approximately parallel to and on each side of such right-of-way - at a distance suitable for the appropriate use of the land, and: +.r F-b0 y f, • ii * w s s • • -e • • • • • e e • 0 It LD F T 6-14-93 o o o o w s -'e e ♦ e • • e o a. The distance shall be determined with due consideration at ' ;,, cross streets or the minimum distance required for a' ,, ' approach grades and to provide sufficient depth to allow screen planting along the railroad right-of-way in a nonindustrial areas. h P. Access to Arterials s # a- a 0o le r „ s: 4 1. Where a development abuts Yorx as ,traversed by an existing or ,: proposed arterial zit`>. i .` .k f actp street, the development 11, design shall provide adequate protection for residential z..-, properties and shall separate residential access and through ,' _ traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall ,. minimize the traffic conflicts, The design [ e e) J ;' , shall include any of the following: " a A parallel access street along the arterial or ..major col c b b. Lots of suitable depth abutting th • . p g the arterial or .ma' :collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage 4. along:.:another street, y c. Screen planting at the rear or side property line to be contained in a nonaccess reservation along the arterial 44 ina-. Agti: C Y::i or .• `, d. Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives of this subsection. r '''t Q. Alleys, Public or Private: ,,4 1., Alleys, 20 feet in width, shall be provided in commercial and. 4'''',..' j j •:, industrial districts, unless other permanent provisions for _ access to off-street parking and loading facilities are made [ - - - - - - -41soion] , ands. a While alley intersections and sharp changes in alignment "4 shall be avoided, the corners of necessary alley intersections shall have a radius of not less than 12 feet. R i R. Survey Monuments: C9 ; 1. Upon completion of a street improvement and prior to acceptance. 1 by the City, it shall be the responsibility of the developer's ` - registered professional land surveyor to provide certification . to the City that all boundary and interior monuments shall be .. reestablished and protected. ,yy `:t h F-11 4 o S + . . . . . . . . . . . DRAFT 6-14-9 3 . . . . • . . . . . S. Private Streets. Design standards for private streets shall be established by the City Engineer; and 2 [45-.-] The City shall require legal assurances for the continued maintenance of private streets, such as. (i) A bonded maintenance agreement, and (ii) The creation of a homeowners association; 'x:°v. of::••:r•.v-vv::::::.v:-:•::::: ....v::;..:.: .v:::v:•w:vv::v: ': •:..;,Y,.':i:"!Y;:..`,.Y}:iii:;:i;i i..:::•i f.:.:i.. '': �¢:. :n .. ... .. J..._.r; ;y.....r... { .' e�ittr d only with; >r�> '. tar d::<;:dev .�rpments a obi .e nos e ,: na�cks:x><«�fic� �a�ilt� f h' � �►nt�a�. ;:�ev�lo ments:v T. Railroad Crossings: I Where an adjacent development results in a need to install or .improve a railroad crossing, the cost for such improvements may be a condition of development approval, , : p or another equitable means of cost distribution shall be determined by the public works Director and approved by the Commission. U. Street Signs: 1. The City shall install all street signs, relative to traffic control and street names, as specified by the City Engineer for any development. The cost of signs shall be the responsibility of the developer. V. Mailboxes 1. Joint mailbox facilities shall be provided in all residential , ; developments, with each joint mailbox serving at least two dwelling units. a. Joint mailbox structures shall be Placed adjacent to roadway curbs; b. Proposed locations of joint mailboxes shall be designated on a copy of the preliminary plat or develo menfi lan, and Ida shall be approved Ythe (1)ircctor) ` ai . � .» ve Offlce prior to fina]: plan approval; and .J t •M �f. DRAFTS-14793 t�yy g� pig �t y/l a e a o • • o • a_• •�' • D R A S 6!:S-14793 ` •, o. • -, o o o. • ' o` o � • ,• 1!, 1 . ` c Plns for the joint mailbox. structures;.'to be used shall P.P. , submitted for approval by the [Director] ` � scup p ti:gg. - t .e A.r4.• ... .. P ist`.'office prior to final approval. N Traffic Signals: 1. ' The location of traffic signals shah. be noted on approved street plans, and: '• -. a. where a proposed street intersection will result in an immediate' need for a traffic signal, a signal meeting approved specifications shall be installed- The cost L. shall be ncluded as a condition of development. • ' X. Street Light Standards: =` 1. Street lights shall be installed in accordance with regulations '� ' ' - adopted by the City's direction- x : a ?_. Y Street Name Signs: 1 Street name signs shall' be installed at all street :• -; intersections. Stop signs and other signs may be required. x'' Z Street Cross Sections: . , �., ' 1. The cross-section of streets in inches shall not be less than ti - the minimum shown in the following tables , r Type of Street Subbase Levelino Course Surface t Arterial 12" 4" a" Commercial and , Collectors 12" 3" 4" � Local Streets 8" 2" 3" .f. esidentua3»<:Acoess < SSA£e 'S 4= a. Subbase and leveling course shall be of select crushed rock; * t fi b. Surface material shall be . of Class C or B asphaltic concrete; ,' f -J a.° a , }.; .; d •4 a e _:,,. °/ 1 _. „ ., .,,... 7 i 1 v . . • . . . . • . A.1 . Y c. The final lift shall be placed on all new construction 'Y roadways prior to City- final acceptance of the roadway, ,. '' however, not before 90 percent of the structures in the s,:''''.'.'..7.'_ new development are completed unless three years have : ;, elapsed since initiation of construction in the •'_ development; a. The final lift shall be Class B asphaltic concrete as defined by A.P.W.A. standard specifications, anc, e No lift shall be less than 1-1/2 inches in thickness. (Ord. 84-50; Ord. 83-52) ;, 18.1E 4.040 Blocks r a A. Block Design: ` 1. The length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites ,for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, `{ circulation, control and safety of street traffic and ;.-, recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. D. sizes: ' blocks adjacent to arterial 3trccts or unles3 th. —e::- ig ,. ; : k ` peri Teter of k blocks formed`by streets shall not exceed. ,.tOG fgaglgigt.fifeb . . 'oia ...: y Eil fitt v 1...i...0-. Z 03..,W4 6...pt -5., :'w.„ a : W e } ecj ; od }ar_nn is pre,�1u a ay to i topd0raph0r`r v�aet 'ends or other,,::bodies of water•or O.re! �o ^i 3'�.•' �.,. � w, R 'ii f:is }Y �e';;+ ft t .�'.�I 1�. •4t �e7�°•f� d' i 'tif0: 1.�}”:'::.:.k .,y\?.:'..Y'•'' i;4. ...:y:......, :.•:,Eoty,;c:Y•.'•�`: #:k>:rt:..�' .4 ''.•s►A � .�; ..;�;. .�v a�or co�.�ecttzrs �r ra�.�r�sads �or� �� ��.,.. :::;:: 5 of - 74 f r M f a,y ::; ,-. r ,r y> }..- �: ri 2 •:..:.::....'r. . :. tom'':' _ 6 n Y ?% ;._ ,� ct' ost' jPc<arr3es # �valnt acdess it ,91 < e�3.::>::bloc'k t l:a ig sk},..'reatert#t'Ythan,#>:�6OO.....feet.`.:#::are::><': a i:.t#tec, , ; > }:: :# >• 3 the<'=0i'4 ' ' a ,, . F-14 " ate ''..'1-::,2‘.;;;.--','-,•4: ., '� `..j r ., ,5: ''''.2. • • . . . DRAFT 12-29-93 . fi. : 18.1b4.050 Easements . A. Easements: . 1. " Easements for sewers,' drainage, ,water mains, electric lines .i or other public utilities shall be either dedicated or ••• provided for an the deed restrictions, and • y., a. Where a development is traversed by a watercourse, or < . drainageway, there shall be provided a storm water -!-4:,- -..,-:...,-.-, easement or drainage right-of-way conforming �. °'.. substantially with the lines of the watercourse[; B. Utility Easements: r 1_ A property owner proposing a development shall make x. arrangements with the City, the applicable district and each -, utility franchise for the provision and dedication of utility r t-:it. easements necessary to provide full services to the .„ development: a. The City's standard width for public main line utility ,:• easements shall be 15 feet unless otherwise specified by ` ' the utility company, applicable district, or City - ::-':',....4.',1_?.,- Engneer, and r l [ x i•x lot. (9:d - ..SI .. ,'x:..--&-3 •-52) , %. •' „' 18.164.060 Lots - A. Size and Shape: ' '{ 1.' 1. Lot size, width, shape and orientation shall be appropriate 1 i A` for the location of the development and for the. type. of .use :} j contemplated, and: a, a. No lot shall be dimensioned to contain part of an •t':: m existing or proposed public. right-of-way; 5 b. The depth of all lots shall pot,.`,e�x�ceed 2-½ tjimies the m .', {{:t fi(,} {a Y r 4i" 1 A •J.,. _ Gi �4 ® average width[ l lli a :ess2a he are %z{s {les 4_..z ® average }: .{" :{N:X`C'.i:..;. ,,. y+yXOyY f:+N%y{e ,.. {y .<....r}y....f{ f�J: L}�lf' f ri 6 times '�aWtgmkitti�l r Sot 4s ze g of%=the {a. o l� ca slre 4zoitan Y { E ■ d.3.5tT9t, . . u { { i F-1 5 s. l 1-ii 17 4: 4- : _ ..1I is D RAF T6-14-93 e C. [s+ , e-, _ _.- . _ _ - '- - • - T, (d.1-) Depth and width of properties (rescrvcd] zoned for commercial and industrial purposes shall be adequate to provide for the off-street parking and service facilities required by the type of use proposed. B Lot Frontage; ;•^ggY,�+0 1. Each lot shall abut upon. a b � ivate street other than an alley for a width of at least 25 feet`unless the lot ,a . is created through a minor land partition in which case Subsection 13. (C).162.050` applies. (C) pp x C. Through Lots: 1. • Through lots shall be avoided except where they are essential to provide "separation: of residential development from major traffic arterials or to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation, and a. :, planting buffer at least ten feet wide is required abutting the arterial rights-of-way; and b. All through provide the required front yard setback on each shall, D. Lct Side Lines: � ' 1. The side lines of lots, as far as practicable, shall be at right angles to the street upon which the lots front. , ..;; E. Large Lots: 1. ` In dividing tracts into large° lots or parcels which at some , future time are likely to be redivided, the Commission may require that the lots be of such size and shape, and be so 2 divided into building •sites, and contain such site restrictions as will provide for the extension, and opening of streets at intervals which will permitta subsequent -division of any tract into lots or parcels of•°smaller size, and: a. The land division shall be denied if the proposed large development lot does not provide for the future division of the lots and future extension of public facilities. ha (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) F-16 1 .-r • • . . D R A F T /ADOPTliD WIT Kmost clizigaz 4-26-94. BY C.C. . ' . . . .i (Page F8, item A.2 proposed amendments were not added) • :' + 18.3.64.0'70 Sidewalks A. (Cidewalka:' Rcquirccd) - • = ,] [e] idewalks shall be constructed, replaced or repaired to City design standards 4,d as set forth in the standard specifications manual •and located as follows: • jam--)On both sides of arterial and collector streets to be • = built at the time of street construction; ( -] On both sides of all other streets and in pedestrian easements and rights-of-way, except as provided further in this section, to be constructed along all portions of - the property designated for pedestrian ways in , . conjunction with development of the property; and • r [e-0-.) ';'On one side of any industrial street to be constructed $ at the time of street construction or after *4 �. determination of curb cut locations. B. A planter strip separation of at least five feet between the curb and the sidewalk shall be requt3.red in the design of any arterial '1.;,•r'.,),11,_ or collector street where parking is prohibited adjacent to the curb, except where the following conditions exist: there is inadequate right-of-way; the curbside sidewalks already exist, on ;; predominant portions of the street; or it woua.d conflict with the utilities. C. In the central business district.; sidewalks shall be 10 feet in width, and 1. All sidewalks shall provide a continuous unobstructed path; and 2. The width of curbside sidewalks shall be measured from the back of the curb. D. Maintenance: 1. Maintenance of sidewalks, curbs, and planter strips is the + continuing obligation of the adjacent property owner. • an F-�17 • 4:--,,'•:..1: ', s • s 6 o o • • o e m D R..A. 6 i 6-14-93 • • s w.. • ®.. • • . E. Application for Permit and Inspection: d' t 1. If the construction of a sidewalk is not included in a "; performance bond of an, approved subdivision or the ' ' performance bond has lapsed, then every person, firm or corporation desiring to construct sidewalks as provided by { this chapter, shall, before entering upon the work or improvement, apply for a street opening permit to the [ire t -el - 4fl Ax . department to so build or construct: a. An occupancy permit shall not be issued for a :' development until the provisions of this section are satisfied. b. The City Engineer may issue a permit and''certificate allowing temporary noncompliance with the provisions of this section to the owner, builder or contractor when, in his opinion, the construction of the sidewalk is impractical for one or more of the following reasons: :E (i) Sidewalk grades have not and cannot be 44 4, established for the property in question within ,.'• a reasonable length of time; f :' P (ii) Forthcoming installation of public utilities or street paving would be likely to cause severe ',: ,' damage to the new sidewalk; ,i„ a (iii) Street right-of-way is insufficient to k` accommodate a sidewalk on one or both sides of 4: the street; or st. *' (iv) Topography or elevation of the sidewalk base 4 •,,-----'x ` area makes construction of a sidewalk t. impractical or economically infeasible; and ,d , tot^ ;` f c. The City Engineer shall inspect the construction of. Q. • sidewalks for compliance with the provision set forth in the standard specifications manual. ,. Council Initiation of Construction: 1. In the event one or more of the following situations are w found by the Council to exist, the Council may adopt a t ,. -1 resolution to initiate construction of a . sidewalk in, ' accordance with City ordinances: •is F-18 l: i i r i t 5 1 .I ....;‘,..::'' ' 1 , } ti 4 y (;.j r s l' ' ". s,.t •, D. R AP i 6-14-9.3 e • • a. A safety hazard exists for children walking to or from school and sidewalks are necessary to eliminate • the {x, hazard; b. A safety hazard exists for pedestrians walking to or from a public building, commercial area, place of assembly or other general pedestrian traffic, and sidewalks are necessary to eliminate the hazard; c. 50 percent or more of the area in a given block has been improved by the construction of dwellings, multiple dwellings, commercial buildings or public buildings and/or parks; and d. A criteria which allowed noncompliance under section E.1.b above no longer exists and a sidewalk could be constructed in conformance with City standards. (Ord. 7 89-06, Ord. 83-52) 18 14.080 Public Use Areas A.4 r Indicated in Development Plan: Dedication Reauirements Where a proposed park, playground or other public use shown I- in a development plan adopted by the City is located in whole or in in a subdivision, the Commission may require the dedication or reservation of such area within the subdivision. 3. Not Indicated in Development Plan: Dedication Require=Ants . where considered desirable by the. Commission in accordance with adopted comprehensive plan policies, and where a development plan of the City does not indicate proposed _public use areas, the Commission may .require the dedication or reservation of areas within the subdivision or sites of a character, extent and location suitable for the development of parks and other public use. development 6-• C. Acquisition by Public Agency: 1. If the subdivider is required to reserve land area for a park, playground, or` other public- use, such land shall be acquired by the. appropriate public agency within 18 months following plat approval, at a price agreed upon prior to approval of the plat, or such reservation shall be released to the subdivider. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) } F-19 X. .. ._ .. �S. .'}�� . 'fit $• .. ,. °`.` . +.. ?:� a y fr <' ' i t e i , x .T k. , • gijib mow ,,mir f ,y • D R A F T6-14-93 18.164.090 Sanitary Sewers w T; alp A. Sewers: Required as 1. Sanitary sewers shall be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Standard. Specification Manual and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. B. Sewer Plan Approval: • 1. The City Engineer shall approve all sanitary sewer plans and proposed systems prior, to issuance of development permits . involving sewer service C. oversizing: 1. Proposed sewer systems shall include consideration o: additional development within the area as projected by she 4 t comprehensive Plan. D. Permits Denied: 1. Development permits may be restricted by the Commission or xs Hearings Officer where a deficiency exists in the existing -,_ sewer system or portion thereof which cannot be rectified within the development and which if not rectified will resul t in a threat to public health or safety, surcharging of existing mains, or violations of state or federal standards pertaining to operation of the sewage treatren_ system (Ord. 89.06, Ord. 83-52) 18.164. 100 Storm Drainage A. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: • 1. The. Director and City Engineer shall issue a development permit only where adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff have been made, and: a. The storm water drainage -system shall be separate and independent of any sanitary sewerage system; b. Where possible, inlets shall be provided so surface W water is not carried across any intersection or allowed • J to flood any street; and 4 , ,.. D R A F T 6-14-93 s e c. Surface water drainage patterns shall be shown on every .; development proposal plasm. u L B- Easements: 1• Where a subdivision is traversed by a watercourse, ,X. dr .nageway, channel or stream, there shall be provided a storm water easement or drainage right-of-way ` conforming substantially with the li i nes of such watercourse and such • further width as will be ' adequate for conveyance and t- maintenance. a J ` C. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: 1. A culvert or other drainage facility shall[;--ia-na--ea ease] be(71 large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside , the development, and: a. The City Engineer shall [d ]aoorrve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of the 1981 master drainage plan, ' D. Effect on Downstream Drainages t ,aa ' 1. Where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of v. additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the 1981 master drainage plan. (Ord. 89-06, Ord. 83-52) 18.164 . 110 Bikeways d k A. Developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or se° rights-of-way. B. Development Develo ment permits issued for .Planned unit developments, o conditional use permits, gubdIvis onsfl and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost ar: rcon istruct or of bikeway •improvements. C. [ -- - :_ - - - _. — —. ■ — ■ travel including pcdcatriann. ) F-21 rYt-`4Y 1i. i 4,, y 1. . :i h i. j + T `I 1 la, 5 y. p, f. t•y. r4. i a (D-] Minimum width for bikeways w :.t S.�Ct Eae 4osds, 'i� is Lam¢) five feet ? ,.+us .S<"..v.r r N;C'• dl"�%':� 'F°v�-."4'"�`i 4G:Y'+:SL�d r�•�+21.:"-'f ; ', per bicycle travel lane. , :&:.' ��r s � of i'g or:�t ia,i,,F_ ,, `s a •:s 4 • . `�a�a�=`.m0*s :�'' �4�,x � ���,€i53[.x.n'� ':e" • (®rd.• 89 '®6; Ord. -83-5f)._ 18.164.•120 Utilities A. Underground Utilities: -' ;.• 1. All utility , lines including, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be {. 3 t ;; ' placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities '. during construction, high capacity electric lines operating ' at 50,000 volts or above, and J # , a The subdivider shall make all necessary arrangements x with the serving utility to provide the underground services; b. The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; c. All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and = 9 storm drains installed in streets by the subdivider, _'• :4 4 Z.. shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets and ~ Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to -10 avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. ;:,- B. Information on Developmen*- Plans: ' 1 . the applicant for a subdivision shall show on the development ' plan or in the explanatory information, easements for all x underground utility facilities, and: E a. Plans showing the location of all underground facilities as described herein shall be submitted to the City 6.99 Engineer for review and approval"; and b. Care shall be taken in all cases to ensure that above r ground equipment does not obstruct <vision clearance W areas for vehicular traffic. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) •,,,..--, f,::, - F-22 - s 4_- - t� 51 d r , =4 f .A'e f' . . . e o. • • • . • • D R A F T. 6.-14-93 • . . . •. • •.. . e • • 18.164.130 Cash or Bond Required -,,,...,-2,; ' A. All improvements installed by _the subdivider shall be guaranteed ' as to workmanship and material for a period of one year following I. acceptance by the City Council: B. Such guarantee shall be secured by cash deposit or bond in the ' amount of the value of the improvements as set by the City ' : Engineer. ' C. The cash or bond shall comply with the terms and conditions of Section 18.160.180. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) . 18.164.140 Monuments A. Any monuments that are disturbed before all improvements are ,-, s ' completed by the subdivider shall be replaced Prior to final , i': acceptance of the improvements. (Ord. 889-06; Ord. 83-52) 18.164.150 Installation: Prerequisite/Permit Fee ". A. No land division improvements, including sanitary sewers, storm `. , -..''... ",r. sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other requirements. shall be undertaken except after the plans (thcre=cd) have been approved by the City, permit fee paid and permit issued. z; - B. The permit fee is required to defray (in ..;hole c= in part] the .' ° , cost and expenses incurred by the City for construction and.other a services in connection with the impro.re: ent[ , - u -h] . The : permit fee shall be a s.:.m equal to four percent of the estimated ' , cost of [ouchj the subdivision improvement. (Ord. 39-06; Ord. 83 ••,,,,...*:.:::. 5 2) t: 18.164.160 Installation; Conformation Required A. In addition to other •requirements, improvements installed by the 4- land divider either as a requirement of these regulations or at his own option, shall conform to the requirements of this chapter z and to improvement standards and specifications followed by the City. B. The Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, Oregon t.: 5 Chapter A.P.W.A. , and Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order Kg 4 No. 71-9, shall be a part of the City's adopted installation ' CD standard(s) ; other standards may also be required upon recommendation of the City Engineer. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) . ...1 .....-„,,,.:-.,-; F-23 i n i { • ► • a o.. • •.. D R- A F:T 6-14-93 o '. o • a "a. a o . . a 18.164.170 Plan Checking Required • A. Work shall not b�gin7.untal nine sets of construction and construction estimate plans 'have'.been submitted and checked for • -t adequacy and approved by 'the City in writing. 9• B. All such plans shall.be prepared in accordance with requirements • of the City. (Ord. 89-06° Ord. 83 -52) • 18.164..180 Notice to City Required A. Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. Be If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed • until the City is notified. (Ord. 89-06; Ord- 83-52) t, 18.164.190 City Inspection Required }a a A. Improvements shall be constructed under the inspection and to the r ., . satisfaction of the City. The City may require changes in typical .,-.,. sections and details if unusual `conditions arising... during construction warrant such changes in the public interest. (Ord. { 89-06; Ord. 83-52) i tt 18 164.200 Engineer's Certification Required A. The land divider's engineer shall provide written certification of a form provided by the. City that all improvements, worlanship and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices, and are of high grade, prior to City r �12 • acceptance of the subdivision's improvements or any portion thereon for operation and maintenance. (Ord. 89--06; Ord. 83-52) to H:\Logic\p tty\chapt18.F-1 } {` F-24 i d 1 i { a 1.. 'w..1 ' �. r•!'.. ... a.. ..i: a . r i •'. �'-� \ .7.n { • N ICE OF ADOPTI t, ,, This form must be mailed to DLCD not later than 5 wt g days after Ion ORS 197.615 and OAR Chapter Cam,Divisions 18 See reverse side for submatt3i requirements • (gip ' q 0D0 Jurisdiction CA-c--1 A-AS) Local File# 7.b 4 �l 3 °U°1 Date of Adoption i Date Mailed 6 Date the Proposed Notice was mailed to DLCD F 2-3 Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment V# Land Use Regulaticn Amendment Zoning Map Amendment .± New Land Use Regulation ?yf , :' Summarize the adopted amendment Do not use technical terms. Do not write°See Attached •, 1, =A-,_. u �n � AeVE/V� 1 ,,A I i . � 9�.��A' bT - b `CX9 101 in ' t®C - k- GL P�•`�c,i+e-7 Describe how the adopted amendment differs from the props d amendment if It the same, write°Same° If you did not give notice of the proposed amendment,write°N/A. • rf , s `i t v VAO,s 04- vl e o 4- actee,5, ltd Plan Map Change From to Zone Map Change From to La. ti Location: Acres Involved: ILI Specify Density: Previous Density New Density Applicable Coals: Was an Exception adopted? Yes No 4 DLCD File# DLCD Appeal W t . {, tlY`,x •. t� .. i_.4A ? 1 y i:y .•4f K f. t ry. ,. u.l.,(.aL 1. ;;'i. . :... • Did DLCD receive a Notice of Proposed Amendment 45 days prior to the final hearing? U V Yes _ No _ The Statewide Planning Goals do not apply Emergency Circumstances Required Expedited Review Affected State or Federal Agencies,Local Governments or Special Distn e 01--C-43 4 1 0 t - Local Contact o� Phone: 5 4,1"1/ ` '1 W Address: 6-' G43 A14/-/ is Lq • T7 gal) &d2 t i ..fin SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS q.', ORS 197.615 and OAR aucter 668,Division 18 I. Send this Form and One(1)Copy of the Adopted Amendment to Depaent of Land Conservation and Development 1175 Court Street,N.E. Salem, Oregon 97310-0590 2. Submit three(3)copies of bound documents and maps larger than 81 by 11 inches. 3. Adopted materials must be sent to DLCD not later than five(5)working days following the date of the final decision on the amendment. 4. Submittal of dlir Notice of Adoption must include the text of the amendment plus adopted findings and supplementary information. • o 5. The deadline to appeal will be extended if you do not submit this Notice of Adoption within five working days of the final decision. Appeals to LIMA may be filed 09 within 21 days of the date Notice of Adoption is sent to Dom. 6. In addition to sending Notice of Adoption to DLCD,you must notify persons who • 0 = participated in the local hearing and requested notice of the final decision. • • If you need more copies of this form,please call the DLCD at 503-373-0050 or this form may be duplicated on green paper. e.. Y 3' { t,t. ♦ 1.11 •'j ... J Z f - .. s . ... .. • . .1 ... . 7 .• . te. F.1 . .. K.S..t . ..! ... -,.). ...., .., _ , , ,. . ,,,,,,,zie,e, , :„.... , ,. .. - .. NOTICE OF '. ..... • must be sent' to DLCD 45 days prior to the final hu,trinc; See OAR 660-18-020 - Jurisdiction i`-I" 0 , e R--6 r 1 :; �flj. Local Pile. Number . 9 3 0 6a Date Hailed_ Feh_ ?�, `� Y_— ' ' , Date Set for Final Hearing on Adoption i 4d Month Day Year Time and Place for Hearing . T I CoAv� . C c-'` • 14—Pk I ,s � :t , Type of Proposed Action (Check all that apply) rt omprehensive Land Use New Land Use • s Plan Amendment n, Regulation Amendment Regulation Please Complete (A) for Text Amendments and (S) for Hap Amendments i _ . �.n '. A. S Purpose of Proposed Action (Write a brief description of the-proposed action.- Avoid highly technical y= .i terms and stating "see attached".): , C V7 . 4 �- a.A...V de I,� .4 it Yl ie°.e 1 . -ft) l 0 t 10 .si _co 1 %to!,i 0i Gum, A.A. ! f- . i:rte? 1 V)CiterbiCed - ' r ; / .rl IL .. ..:...+:..._P Jam! �i . 1u x.01-ems ' "M ... a vane 1,1{-t iM�yti- c �-f"' 5 B. - For Map Amendments Fill Out the Following- (For each area to „4..-. _ be changed, provide a separate sheet if necessary. Do not use .-.;,.%.,,'y tax lot number alone.): • - Current Plan Jiesagnatinn:•.y -- Proposed Plan Designation: 4� ,h , r,s _ yob K= . + C " 3. € ' Current.Zone. .-i_.. - Proposed lone: ,<_ �� Location: x - .�' r• is ".``+, ,c- -��` .r: .� �•* fir. -6 Acreage Invol' ed: -Y t. Does this Change Include }an Exception? 'r, 'r Yes ,,a:. No_, . 1 . . '1;:tso-. .. .. ?�;A•.. , .3,.....• For Resident a]•'Changes =Please,,S the Change in Allowed Density in Units''.Per; Net;Voice: <.,- .,s - y ' Current Density: . Proposed. Density: - Y , ' • .t I. :, i 4i /4 , . , Far w+ ZI n r c 2 , '.. r f a 3,k :,./.,.. ei z w M� jB�+ttt•`r � iTi� '7 ,✓ 1,4. rr cr '4,1;''. '' . ,1::-, .Y 4 14 64 r5,,t>fP r 4-.4-,,,,, ,,,..+ ' iw t F T F 4e N f t. ,c.04-, . ar w., r;ti! .r, a Y" '":y' �? 1 > a a. ' ? s •r_. .1 F ,pa 7 7? •i a�ai. ,4 X fie• `: S List Statewide Goals which May Apply to the Proposal, � 'L FS'rf-5 Pt ►C '1' 9 1! ,n Y11 en tra- I Z' l �ernment or local Spacial , ^- List any state or Federal Agencies, cteaa� by the j Service Districts Which may be Interested in or impa -, F Proposal: 0 TA+.0"1.- { . - ;i -- M lk Direct Questions and Comments To 6-° . (Phone) �D ;' -` f r 4 r a s''•' o Please Attach Three (3) Cop ies of the Proposal fhis Form and • Mail s4 Department of Land Conservation and Devel pment z'' 1175 Court Street, N.E. s Salem, Oregon 97314-5590 NOTE: If more copies of .this form are needed, .please contact the DLCD be .du gicated ®n green paper- s x" office at 373-0050, or this -form pay P T" x '.3 Please be advised that statutes require the "text" of a proposal to be '4,,,. -..-4,s; : �. provided. , A general. description of thy intended action is no sufficient. -Proposed, plan and land use ,regulation amendments must be E° - sent to DLCD at least 45 days prior to the final hearing . .. fi �, (See OAR ��®mil$-®.�®,. - - a' f * * * FOR DLCD OFFICE USE * 1` *- Y< }! DLCD- File Number 4'` -1. # Days Notice :_ ,�. ; roc ;. -:- E.w' ,f,;..- ,- « s'&.-4.:t" .';t'1".:; •;- S 444. '.+v»• 41.. 44} ,, • • pa>proposedfor% • • .. <4 - • i {'` .{, . rpp3P+(tM P 1e�5, g f ',..■c `,14,1,-,4.. -t A , Y,[2 r,,e ,,..:it f,' ,..,' 4 " vd lr yq': 2t-7/.4,'„,.' n.�S�� , Si: ,.4 Jn , Z C