Loading...
ZOA5-75 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. 4�r(1� '+{`laf��.r rt•,�+Wy �rt f�rr�f q t ti hritC a f' art ;f t +y xki • A r`rN••• le '� i lklty + ,(: r1%gefh ( q ry' >� Jttf • `lC+ly't�aa'lµiS+.i,., •t'ty6y����yt',: , z Fgt+F,,1 i .„ • in `r +` e+k',,. ,..• � .. ,� 4 ,:. , ... ... r1,fi:;. i.,:d W ,. t...' :.:: 4 ;9y;.l v ,"In,�.ry. 1 1! fita., • +r„m.e'w.�� r,n-M... 1,,.?�. wt "G.r,a ix • L^.;r..7.L., 1 �rw.xJ.4r.^...�...,..s..Y..'A:.',.:.t:,ui.*���..-,..w—..'+*�,.:i�::3.��,.k—...w'I': w+r a w ,., 1..4",,,.q...�!I r•,:1`. hrs e..,h«,.,�;+w m+wt «�.nt ,triw,�+�ianfr',�.F1m,+.ami+,,, u •r: .,1 ,,�. •w*?'.^.W+�?-N .�+ L,a, ,,.. � .. ..:Y.t,A,_']&,,t .. ;.ar .i�.....,1 r r s . r?.yC xl s ;�r�Ir• ,.,(4,.,4 Y,,i, to ..t r • ,..'.;;:. t tt 1,t •:,t i r;j,; +, ...,.,✓�.' +1:,-r`t td., :. ttfFla. 1 °b rn: .. id a i"'tf�1 'ht xi,�.;::. '�1'��lNi•.'3 f}•v+. .Y:,t.v^���ni';'.iJl+�, .FN...7aks,rttt . . ..,�tfr d�� 4F.,t.,l •a{� `° t ti, 4O(') AMENDING SECTIONS 18 20..020, .030, «i & .040' TO INCREASE MIN. LOT SIZE INR-7, ETC. 9/10175 01 n ..� r W��1 w 'r,4,c1 t'•�(a i w ,� ' *i �''t r'{t'�M1 1`Y' l4ott Yh .f tt 1-}}.,•�t x '44 •W r"(f '! *,t Zone Ordinance Amendment (ZOA 5-75) t �rqj itf�JppPS`(�t' trY t}lr>th,' i i�rls • Oty raft.... t."4t ;�ty4, 1� z et St;4S`xi at` t ', (121 0.,1, ,;g t! 'ry !! Y CC it(tn,rj' It qqr , 'ill 41:q`* 'Y„wt`w , • ,...._ ,►antes • ... ..... ...... ._,.- ...:; ......:,., iomag'i" d.4 .,, ,.., ., .... ,f'., ,. .. (1 t lli 11�,f ,. ,•fir, +Yaws: _YwY.m«a _ .. ....." w.rc.r.o. .aYvour..ar..m.w _. 7',.','i,11.,',.'...,'''',..,::. +f'}P,i,tIV f Ay' ,A�f,f rL' ffr}l 'Yds"ji Y+1 4r q .r',x'41 w1; CITY O.A., T.IGARD OREGON 6 {{; } P r. p!4.,.r,ri,«,.; ORDINANCE No. 76�. �" ,ry. ,';iris', y,"A''^'_''`' AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TIE TIGARD MUN:i�C IPAL CODE CHAPTER 18.20 SINGLE ,;�k `` FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES TO INCREASE; THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE REQUIRED 4'.',2:,:,:''(,..'.',, , FOR ADU�'LEX IN THE R-7 LaTOCOVERAGEt10,000 ,OFROMQU'ARE FEET,,.AND IN THE tiVi FP;y)1+fi 5!, y �, ,� R l5 ZONE TO DECREASE 35 PERCENT TO 25 ''"f"x`jy PERCENT; PRESCRIBING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. Y x :;>> THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS �'I �r�+ fyti�r': � 1 '`,''" %� Section 1• Finding that pursuant to Chapter 227 of the Oregon Revised r g dr„ " Statutes and Ordinance No. 70-- 2 (City of Tigard Zoning x,, 4;4 ,: 1970) , codified as Chapter 18, Tigard Municipal Code, the ce 4.,1,!,4,44, e ina �5d Ord.enan.fter�s'ta�ed amendments to said zoningordinance,4 ce, p��rsu2.�nt to Iip,i,.,, prescribedprocedures,. were heard in a public` hearinheld bythe Tigard .!iq+'I, g September 16, 1975, and ala_ interestepersons , were there oand sthen afforded an opportunity"..'. to be heard and thereafter ,gyp,^rr '.4,',';',,I,,,'.',,4,:,,� y`d �a�'t+r the Planning Commission recommendthat sid zoning ordinance, as codi- I 3"a*,° fled, be amended as hereinafter Set forth; and, further finding that, 'i;:'' after due and legal notice, a public hearing was held before the City yh'fl' C ` tr {�P'4''F , , persons desiring to .,cal on February 9, 197 ,,��'�", 'be heard were afforded an opportunity to betheard eand present and rebut �� �'' evidence with respect to said amendment; and further findingthat qt.t„:' based ,on evidence both oral and documentary, and on the record of that '.,',„4,,I; 0hearingbefore the PlanningComm ssa on the Council has made the follow- r�,,' , ,, ing substantive findings. �It�� Sect : that the purposefor these amendments is to pro - ' Section4-----.4:----h.---z 2: Finding � ht the public health safet dnd eneral welfare and « ,p V'Y,'{y4lJ further finding that these amendments are neces necessary to ensure the ' � `+e right of Tigard's citizens to adequate light, air and open space and 'ti,�,,, .aai to conform the single family residential zones to the objectives of the �,,,,:r ,'" Tigard Community Plan of 1971 and its amendatory Neighboxy:tood Plans. ( ',',„*,,,..,, ,:,Y'":'; Section 3,. 'TAT THEREFOR, G: ` ♦SYI } ���d f ',:,!.,.',S4 Section �.5.20,O2O Conditional Uses) paragraph �1) , which now +il} }z • a'. (1) Duple : residential, i,th a minimum lot size of eight r+V�ta'+`*� enta.al � w 'f``1 `� t+h:ousand' square feet: one dJiplex per lot; � I1��!;.'' A shall be amended `to read ,ti�Y ;'; ;+;A,>t' , ; (1)Duplex residential, with a minimum lot size of -ten ha� '�;,,,,i', thousand square feet: one duplex per lot. k ` Section 15.20, s },,'�:d' oho Lot Size �� Zone) p g ' p C 7 � ) ;`� �i `" 7 ara ra h4� l and 2 „,,:, , hch now read ,")1 • : • (i)� The minimum lot area shall be seven thous and five hundred 4 ,,,,,,,,.'.4' square feet. e, Z{d( ,4'rpt ' (2) The maximum lot coverage shall be thirty-five percent r sA shall be .. .. r,r/',,/,'::::.',,,,:,,, ,,,n,,, amend d to read. , 4��r rF y ,y1 ff�^ rli 1,4g r$k,.p. ' a A�'"; ',4,1epr �.}i rya%"Y... «ir y ,._�� .�1...,,, ...- � ,,.. .. e ...,„ .,r..�nv h'>'+ ...�+rwwlr!^r �. ,a , '" ;..♦1GRW�ru: twa r� I � 1.� ?NMi. � d'..P {^l ! _, : � ,r. _.. �..,. ':r" ,,,,,r",”, � A 'rf .•,,A,.' 'r f�. 'j,Y Y9, I^�' , ,.fie .�e .. �.x, ti ,n,.�trr+. -"?"r"1��11+ Smt.Y��Mv�rA'FY,.3,rg5Y� ?�_&_,7 'h+rm�f`?s�t�,FSx_,^R .,�1';?�"7("ra"""e;T � 4�^4;{W{lay"�"�;rop��-"�rt;�tiztis.au,.�,_�' .,,.,5 "9�' ,.6 •�� *t.«r;E�.1� ,_.'_'�P,I� �z4' r" dt,. �I ��e" �PI�` h t.4 '','11'1'''' � 1 y 1, - IJy a•uaA�� t4' A# tj '''1 s,A • s',,,,. it m, °' The minimum of area shall he seven thousand five hundred r' lot 1. square feet, excepting for duplex use, �+kA�i (2) The minimum lot area for duplex use shall be ten thousand ...',,,,:i krfeet. . .square irrkl'T P'''', (3) The maximum lot coverage shall be thirty-five percent oi' ' i..1'.'..''' the lot area: 1f ,�.' Section 18.20,040 Lot Size, ,R--15 Zone., paragraph (2) , which now ,, read.$• 1„iM "� ' 2 ` The maximum lot coverage shall be thirty-five percent ' shall be amended' to read: rry,t '''',':''',c.,„ (/2`` The maximum lot coverage shall be twenty-five percent. NS l J y , P Ir • P r±'yyCk., �: 'i«'' Section 4 Inasmuch as it is necessarY for the peace, health, and 1�klt safety of the people of the City of Tigard that the zoning ' this b possible',1:,.,i.',',,,, matters as hereinabove set forth be established with the least o . 1k'', � delay, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and Ordinance shall rr ,kpp y ' ,rearp . j ' - the mayor. � be effective upon a�ts- enactment by the Council and approval .r t Bay 'UNANI M • p . . , y ,,d 'ASs ]�: MOSS vote 4��j, of all Counc�.l members resent after �� {i!.)41. beingthree times by number and title only, `thus 1, 9TH day of �f ,; read r r, J:F.►.Di�.U.E"11ZY , l�l t ,,,,,it',7, i , . ,c?, ‘ 4,,,17'•....-:, )'1,1,,S Recorder - City of igard { r3 {Srr,tN +'”r r 4; the Mayor; this , 9TH day of F BRU 1976 Exr 1 ,.it„ 1 N `,J.. � W � tf41 A ''ri; :. G?. . r ,'-e.-. .kk' 4/ i,5.-.6',..," 2 ,,,,, Mayor - City of Tigard( ;',.;;4.,'.," ,,,,:,,,,,t,,,, ..r, r '4q1,,, , ,G�i,,r vw . +fi` ti k ,.1,',,i':',,,;,;:.:, tSOrdinaace `o b 7 '� 6. I 11:1,., i, 1-',''',:,'!,',:::::!,,,''''i. r,' Y§,w ,k 'Eyg �J., 1 ,l ;,_::, „w yu,w.w„: svwm^.Mr..uH n��r"W.h,e2,i 9nP '.r atMY'R;r4,s+WMn;„t!; i - t. '�"w *4,4.1.. "4 .::.,,:,.',';',''..:::,,,,f.:. -_ '1,:,;,;:;:",'..:::''...,...'',,',.;;'`'.:..:',''..”.''. .. fir, L I4 el+ t1�A�A1 . 'Approved yv unanimous vote ote o LC ouA i1 pre h7 01 o ' { e) ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT :. sY`h A request by 'city of Tigard,,gerd to amend aet`.tioll$ 'X89'20 e 02p 18420030v and 10a20n040 ,of the Ti and Mur rape+ . Code to ,r ;F i creas the, si,zoril re.0 red ib x ' .de +A .1 . for' du,pl- x and two r y 'us : from 81.000 square Yee' z6b y 3 r sqUare •(1 ) Public hearing Opened • Statement .of t" is by P ,amn . g'. ,Leet off" eJ ^y q� �� �fi ivY (`2) PiUb C Testl..toty '"° Note Cross Exam.naioan. • (3) Platn ag Dir►ector recons&c1ed ehatgitg the previous q, r� ' "a+e s. .for m� �.�`� � a d, the d. ti du a eat �"�;�T���rnc� ��� .� e� �'�i�?�. �� d�,Y� rens 1 de oeo a8 , a GcbditioAa1 cite! r � + +v+�, (q Consideration by Council ORDINANCE NO6, AN QRD NANCE AMENDING THE TTCARD MUNICXPA1 CODE# CHAPS 18 9 20 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEEIS, `� I E TO H4AS� �X�� �l�Y� � �� REQUIRED, F i U '(,E HE FOR A DUPIJEX IN �rl.[;;I +e ,f ZONE FROM 8 ,000 TO 10 000 SQUARE F. Ir AND TO D CREASE THE MAXIMUM ++, , poT RAGE PROM, 35 .PERCENT X10 25 P1RCE'NT AND DEZETI X RE81DENOE5 AS 'A�CnN�y1�TONAxJ��t,i��$yyt{/y,��t`. R 30 f.1ON P ` CR irN'. AN ' EP +`1�l tG I DAVE AND DyEC;CaA;R.TNG AN flEdi., ;R 'ENC", u ' " Gouhoil d. used the title a. k'�ara r fu.ke intention of the o r dl tilnot �+ l#i) (�+� }y.�� �+�1 x+�, µ .76-$t Fy�{ryy �y y (/� �ry y D y' r " " to` , o a Y} d t anco �o 7 LcilmC�7.. Cooko setord d by Cou o i ,mmi. Mic els it y • fr , re�t,ir, ra,+ Mot o : to amVA1d Ord etoe No 7t.,,5 by it8o1',itite the wt t,ds gIONE 4 ter acid# fou14t line doh. �'`}F�`' ► Tho d sec6rid d by CoutOilMan, Miokelsono �,a uxrrl AIppro a ,t ed e e . toDrdiritanoe o a 76.5 by un .t i.r pus +1 r4�E vote of Co o. 10 e rya PAGE4 �i• COUN Th MINUTES FE)►1.UARY 9-0 1c)7 to++rta 1 ^,N,*n y."; cP1y?Mi�e zea. +s ,+-s 5�,..: ., .. ,r�«"i{"�'n.'"a""�"+°r� ,P.<I,.���l�Y1b.M1'�' �',.. r�ai.a� o �x�'w"�«+w'.:,.,,.yrC Y�,�',+,x ^Y tji!.k::�x.+ � 4"�:� t •g.p{�'dt , h 4:r,,�i1� :.,','-', riyY�, e 3:;,...„),:.,,, ss ,Real• P fe Sir c �'t �;. '' :, k; '4,.. [,, 14,nit: 'e, its ',: t.,o y �ti.w v{4�... N�,.y,. t /(.::: �y'�{r �jw�" 7 r i ry M r.5 r'``,e:!y��(.�u:rrS f 7.1 w O obi',fit=,. M,,4..r ...��'��R`fr4i � C d w,wp S.,1 d�nk � dw �:. PM 4.t.4 J1 1 1 ria� »" a ';� �: 1.�.. ,.., P d »:» ».,�� �'��u . {�'t 1.�w��'� ' p ' � JtiO;'� {,} } -amend �� l7 �rt two litos y1 read „ J1AAtY7y• ' - 25 tr41'«(,.4.pFyr . o P ,tir_�s° tR. T.i}fr Y'q AND ! yNWE DATE AND {q , 1itOi't4FE(..g.Lrf..,, ,,,:-4 1.3`ia.a . F" wq 9p Also, to. amend text of 1 # odl . -o ; 4,tio 1last �hroelinoo1pageo4i e0y: ,'c l .r 't,%,'.','''.' t read Wy1aDuple eside . ia1a with a Minimum ',,,,','I,..!, Lo , lze v ter) thousand square ► 3 ono duplex ''',-')'',1... 'Per tot; p Co ciiman Mirkelsoo seconded by I .'fCo tti M Coo 4 " ,�,,1 Amendment approved by unanimous vo •te of Council ;; },, ,,, prese�• i� Nk{, YM j: „ ,�;;�I ti Di,soue,b .or oa .led for" oh Ordience 76 08 amended , t i, 1V{on�;,, e m � ' o��- t adot Orli a 'ce '76 ,5 as ammended was;te , passed b unanimous vote of Couno present n Ily�7`r� 'f '; City Admitistrator recommended that Council consider ax, s4an : mrefc ' o� mendt oCphns Comprehensive 1- '6 - ch ne a1; g aa „,iH'„w O I C App ratio 1� , Sherwood Tnrq 1'5700 8.W., Upper Bon t. eeery Road - DA. ;App: i roat4,an , r ' ., i �{�,,� �a,��'o�°� 207 °.��,, aid ���,��a � �� Application �,{,,, Big, 8 .1hr,a 4y r p at. on '''.,:Ol' s r t 1 20 SW' P o f H SADA ApP1:t6ation �twva ��';��� SW Pacific s'. ' ppM i .. r� ` Valley IY 7 �VI,Y� rY!f�Ti11 �A ��wti1 1T, ' ?fib�.. '.��. ! '` �C.i�a�{..�, .a✓� : ... V �, � �� MW,, � fy k c .9 $ 1 { IAV ���i' �o �h�e�°�� �. ,� � �' � � �.! � (� � �!la�.�:�5 St. .x:C�t�..�J�."1 ., i'^} ai rod�r s Super Market x.2230 SW Main St. . PS Application <,1 :Legion. , U» x SW ''''',' Aterioar Tigard Pos t o 11578 Pac a Rwy p - A Applicat ,o fyY (�) Chief of Police ice requestedthe Sherwood Inn ppLio tioi be ' J ,,� set aside fo..r the text meeting and state the remaining �',”' seven app1ican4RL had beet in'roStigated And were `ec+ S�oehd- , , ed fo approval off''", renew41 by the De�,�artm nt ,;tr Motionto forward applioations to °ICC withouto je ' x, 3: " a seconded •,• C . c ,r „ o. « YY { 1)i$0 , sio , foUUoW d and Council requested the ¶overt Tavern deleted ',From the hint of app . o k and directed h „ef itj-, Ad' ma Supp additionalinfo �Yatior onown pa'�'et�n for i ri.' Couno t1 to s ,deratio rid review. . . ti Y do deo resnd , r'e'trio e qs „ 1: ' t 'the appt ov.aa ., "a `a,',' second and teforward applioationg to 01(4.G without''' object onwithh e ceptio a o Sherwood Xnn agidTown. ,: Tgvorrig CourIn mA Moore9 oeconded y c.,ounomatgook r ve {I, ' try T r ' pAot - 0 0 ` I1 t1 S App' 9 1976 y-rptY.1 1– . r u ...,,.v..n r.r r I .. i:..r! ., i, r...., ��. � ... ;:fr r �i .n,. .., l, •a '' .w,..a;'.: i, r,.•.- r. ..rw. . +..-M xw *:.' + 'Yu. .W�.:t .anew ^ �.. .' r,.. "i '— a :a dA uA ", i ; .4,y !u,°rl Sc !;:,, ,,:� �.�. .. ..,YMN'1,..,X�, p,M.t, A .ir;,IY.. '��FAPMI J,h..P..�"I'" 1f...�, ,! ., :.,.7;H't In��'�y:,:'@�R n5-:,�R' f $ �. 1, � r.. 1 '"' �, L $ gg ., .!ar°! �' -.~i., .pp '+f",..F+t.�'^. . ..,�'��pp i v. 2�...,{ � a..,,. !.: l...7_..,.. ..,,"ri' ,r y�J"i ,p Yf.,, .t .,.. l...,, , +�:' ,.A .,Y ,,.w.. � '. ,..,R:h fil,.,&{ ., m' .�r- .1 r .,� 1,�5 �. .141. ,411D�-'t..:�?f .":f:'n n�W M�« 4y�1[$.,..�.i .-unr � .aNr f��.Y^� ��.. 't�'r.d '�"s 3! P,4 1 i.. .. .li .1 M1 of,�N� r '»'� 2Y � . . if'°..2 - �Yr Y. :.��tv..:��� sir .r,�.,!,t {'^� r1 ; „ fl k ii J .�, CITY,()E T CGAt D NOTICE or PUBLIC HEARING ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ct�r Notice is hereby given, that a L'ublic. Hearing Vi11 be held by the;C'.¢tvy Council h�o at W. 'Walnut. Street, Ti and lNetaFe�i�.ear �'�t�,ior t�I�.gh LectureLecture �,. 10865 S. a Tigard, OregOn, on. Pebruar"y ' A^ 1976 at 8:04 P.M. with respect to the fol10 Ings• A request t byCity of Tigard to amend, sections 18.20 020 18.20 050 and 040 :of the Tigard 1unioipal Code to increase the minimumg' ` ,ot suer 'requ hed in residential *ones for duplex And two roily'' ,s ; use from 80000 square feet to LO,OOO square feet. All interested ted persons may appear and be heard in favor of or agaihs ti the said BY ORbEt'i OP TH1 CITY COUNCIL t x '`„t loris .Hart ig City 1�eCc�rder ,ykw. TT r'ubl'e sh Jainuary 29 a di Pehr'uary 5, 19/6 yyi 11, 1 _ i' dhw' c 4;1 p• f F., rare{'� rl” May ��ruaYj X �,::... .... ... Re a r -,. o �aa..e+' u e,"r a , r�,'1.,. ++t^ Yi ,• af'A,/""t7.Nyt,h-. `t..0 rt1,. ,U'^ ��.��4 rFrly?. ^1�5. A fF'� ..., .-., t q ..5�„FINN^ ..N1�9Md.,k�-'a1+�„�..k;fi0. e5b'7-J6 r,.4!�..��.1,:. �;K.-,� 'Y,'"'+C�Y�•d"_`.:1.. , .'�. tMT, .� +,�W ,.9,. 5��h4 , ,.�!•. ,rul{.,r w„'y � n'#7 rye,, 'bli: ", 1,?;,,,r4; o dlt fit 4 Id ' t'a, ) 1. ,—� ! i , a ``t' AFFIDAVIT OF 1'UBLICATION „k�li .r► '''`° STATE OF OREGON, 1 rY`� ��1"1; COL�'N'x'Y OF WASHINGTON, ss • r11�"��7 T(�,�yqy} ���iii ^,x�.(1} }�i{v s r"'"�-'7'^�"� '';V.; r+�+«. ......../,���F„r,,,,,,�, , yam I do` I GG.Gxn11 it.rtw.i.ai4i-4 Gx iLa.isGMaY.•J1_15.s epb -S- J.M:e w....'aYnG Jw..........G ..... •,,..., t ,,k 'd t CI Y 0 ',,TIIG tT ., ..., lit' NOT° 1 ` 7 L • tl 1 i� 1 4f.,,,,--.4‘,, 14 f _ j ,� F 4'�, Y } Utl{ I ,Y}�t'y being first duly sworn, depose and say that .I am the publisher _.J._.ixi. 4 a , l'llbt AlstO ,. i,bNiE ' '', � � � + ��`, ti�, ,a hd h #vd.�n�� w_ l`•rj+t � '�� yy rt ,,:.1 h���(yV,r1C7�1--�1�.)�� �%�/!>I y''� ►�4y ltrFtyt•1. Y :.,. ' Y:.:.. ,. i _ , 1'1 l ii,,ti,la 'wiii 1`!' libid �7•t „EitY ,1,NQ ,,4111 , '''':4.,:n x.,: G...y.»a...x.....,Yx.of The Tigard Times, a newspaper of general cii cuiation, as defined bii a�t ATO*,,, �yVi jurliol,i i" .t ,�,,, r,qE !,Roorn► ,X,0865 S,W' ✓ainu tr pet i �► published at Ti •gard in the aforesaicd county' and „„,,„,,A,.„,,,,,,I'd fore°oii,�'o `'p'eh til W b i`es a t`to he to iwina J ��f, by ORS 193,Oia' and.193 02... a � � : �_:. `� x yp �1' °�i� � :f � �t��, ��pV4+jf}yL�.�,', ,i,,:1;1',,, x v f• 1 , • 1^ g x�; {i Yktioh }� state• that the legal notice, a printed copy of which is hereto annexe ' gitest bf oi'' i ukc�t 't cl ,� d, way t'ane iiii.8 20 p4O f t ,e l i., 114 2 ,30,„'o a f'�Ir� published in the entire issue of said newspaper for M...,:_g..3._a..3....... successive and p`mere is,'th+A ilii fi4 1f oe,,,si•egs.re;r l t i l ht°+' E, x d i,'1 iI ;''; consecutive weeks in the following issues ,..„4-‘,..„„,,,,-.4„4......,......„,_:- a'd,,two:*.it it $ ro „,,,'^,,,t'ti e en �e ^M }J �( ',1 ,�.. 4 { �` �1 1 ��.FT���iy���y'L����u N��M tydN. 1 �i Til7,,.:�_s',,,,11 V ` �, ,f;'1'. iia'.t l ,Qtlb saki rc�;��et)jl ' Jan. .a 29 �a Feb ary` 5 19 . .esti oris yfx ` . : J:.a..,.ii»«».:,. i„i..u.aa:..... ..w.a.s:. ,�� � '„h� ;.,, �`�53� ��a�t' 1 „ `� .-.. .. a«..a,aY_i.Y. --- o,hea � yrs. ! ,xa k x r� . ..0 ear �►��� �� �'���:� tttii 1. '14,i,.•.•`'',d” 1p,y si- ,1/4:•,1,;,,,',,,',,•„;••,.,t` , a,,,4 r��iryl' .h 3........,a«,. .[+aGK;ir.s,�. 1,,:,- p�••••,l}V�.J�C;i?. ,,,l, �enir.:s ',:i•,`,1',', t "k.. ft,1 � i3ax:.Jwx.3..iYY1 j,WT(��I '1 r l' V no'�t; �, 40)110a/i/040w� ( •-ure) H � ( ,',l`'HE GXT ' .QCT' its, ,l ll,, ,,�c „, r i 4,„. r ,,^s, , �0.d1.,iyar'jtig ,,1,1!` 1:,,,,,..,,,,,,y ,,, y bar i Y{6 #J4 ..., . 'a, „,,,,,,:,,,,,...41:g,ra.., it a ty. iecorde ', y '�J It i, i r�°1. '° � * rrdr � �aCI + '''''''',:re1ti cr .c •s. a.-1--,-.% to bef/yro md�thi 1.. . , _ ,a:'19 6.:,,,,, • ,Publish'.”'• ,,,,:-.,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,•:,,,„,1, 'i f,4 c,i i '.,"{; 11 ,, ,z NM �'�Y R "5�: .n. 4 k^'! ia:aaa.xw.a.wu.......3..i.�...u.xiu..a da �f .i..aG«a.aws a,.ati4�w/taV1a,nu" t,,,,; 1 lr rp4i^.+ '';r ll y fly , ee"" • �'.u{W ✓ I�,m„�+�.h>`+„�i«a«n.anw+�,w.s,Sra as wl x.lso{i w,�.:.hu.,.w„ ''''.44'''''''' i h► � ,,�.: 4!'i''';.,''''. !,t 4'f 1 MGf + a.dti,. °.i d W,�l ` k+,~w,eear dwm�µ�'..amYw.f4,W:; Lii, It 11w r • 1xw r4,, �` 1�,' b 19 lillr* ',..,z,,,41,;,,,,,, .,,.�it.'g,i«ayta y w....,v,,,,„ -,,' ,,r: � a �:Mi ♦ .1 .14r I � r h �., 9” {� ,•,,:',,.' ,� C,','' �Y ,A •,.,„1,-')«, i y p ,_t nJ Ask u�ty el ky ',,„',....• ix /%q�Jr i �' ,,p/ k ,YLj 1R.,i„.xY i K. aua._iau tY • ii.LNJL.«•kJ3•.4 t,rts0 i �� a„t''' ' 4 �. ►'. y, . ” + gon i�.3. 1,a q"J t,�.l l��ta,r Ptzb f Oregon '',,,....;,::'.'„,.4.': �J R� • t a.. GUxI'�1ali9 ion oxpi es fiJ�3a__.i L.3r..,G34.«...-„. a?:.Gf.� s"" • k o+(k af, , it,t, ',.9,..,,i,1,1 , 1,,11 t;" ti r 11,1..1*'%I..'':':,t, I r a 1 , g�r�'r,,li y ft" t , dl 1le ill; i�4{{��� is ,. .� 1- 1 <.."', '.4 r. Y, .. ri ."t.Y,k 1.!ft, ;"F ,X f^,1 ,iw I,MM1f i,,.,,,,!4,^h"y, ., `S�..14,, t N iv.`, `, A. 1.ln., l W, l'' V, W 'l„,,,„..,..1.,,i 1' 11 A i «nw nsn mv' r�we� ,rig.,� �,ayY,� ,�»�r,Gln,r'srN. k .,, ra r r,r r x r-iL.. mJ^�w� arm �4 , ., v ,t1 r ... +' � , G4 I.r , ,.. ..., f+,'£ .. C M1..iS'�'.,C"'�.��� ra ,�:.. .. to .�. ,�.d, 1.1y” -"C^",r1.i r . ,+`�,;, t , �. �-'�' ,. , � 0 1"'f:M'�1011"�+� i M 1 -,.a , , x ;.,. �,.t. 1,/a'p;'". aY. ) `V , ".iei��. 1 J .. , .,7°"! '� '�' ,. d.l .l x ti, i , ,;•, to i,l x ;r +�. .ir. �',.« . «„ .i a, v ,.1 } FW y.y ..,...K Jb ,n r d . ,.1 lr+ t •'1,fir r ''20,9, l f✓ yq r j'' ,�,� MINUTES T;Y ' Tigard PlanningCommission znm sign �, , October 7, 1975 r�b+ {4„tI Twalit Jun .,or High School - Lecture Room ' "t1.J O �S. W.0 �, '', ' S 97th Avenue, Tigard,, Ore on lai)` r>;r.a 1. CALL TO OT ER Chairman Hartman called the meeting to order at 't1,,'!"'''''', 7:40 p.m, ks ( ) '; 2« R,OLL CALL Metubers present: HartmanHallen ateP�pp l��, , . � su� Porter, $ak �o7 Waem9 Ems9 N1c911. stgf ' powell ' ,, : and Laws; Absent: Smeller h ., f.' 3, MINUTES; y Yj , , !}`'plyl� 5 i i stated that the Plannin Comm. Y S ��' a Popp. ss on tn'nute►s roll ca�,l r lo-i ! r .1 should be amended to read t,Ems�� and not 'Hammes fr resent, ,,yrr,,, p JF, ,, ' o Porter stated that item C2 should be rewritten to say that {k`,'rt'; "The NPO Plan should be rewritten and not sent back to the ': 1' nn'n Commission tt n Pl.a i' r �;',, o Porter re� ested that all motaonmade by Planning Gamn�ssio ' members and roll calls be shown in the minutes and forwarded :'o'd to theCity Coupcil ma the state that the inute =.;,i,. amended v� :t n mel on the roll ca s would d be ap;aroved as # � o'ul. t`rtk ' � .� .l� votes and forwarded on {ti' �� to City Council ; 4'r COMMUNXCATIONS s None M '' 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS , N�y�r is Y, pi / ,' ''! ND1TlON 5 < PERMIT RENEWAL, OU NrC emen- s Tigard Schoo] ' G mnast�os continued 1 CO AL USE-. y . � o � , ' r woptGlTle 1,,, 1.6 975 { , 1 . . �, u,8.e .permit '''''' to�o�erat �'ar a two. year rene�ral of aµcc�nd�.t�.onal a ,ti,, to igard tc a gymnastic, school in an M L zone at 9800 S. W r,.r .ga Avenue (Tigard Industrial. Park) , �,. A. Sta ' ' R..port. Readby Powell,,u,. e l ,rc, B. Pu`blid Testimony 's � + 0 Nor, MoCietnents etated that the change over f classes creates a small period of congestion; bunt there is no r;;► )t*il'lailoll, parting " ',. tl b Hes,.ging d10 ed i s ,i+r !,{ ' oope lSt I eG ndatie , aP1'o''i' ''' ;ea ,I,rR, � 1- ra �„•�lr, r:. r _ i PT' p,k.n➢'v :,i'^rttn�.:m';1kr!A�,i'Vlrn+ny)<'eka,,•}> r{rhF^tl. ,h^µ. YI'f,"",�°Y-t».r, ^e4.w,.,.l;'.. �t6f�e',Y p.`. A'A X.._.7�W ^'k,...,",tir"v.':f.` r'Y:, ti;.rr r.:b r4.t, j ;'s!r .!,:A ,..r"1��!, j dt`IL rt! ,G r�+�:k6M�' l�'Aar SRti��' • • E Commission Discussion � 1 o Popp asked Mr. McClements when classes begin and endo o The applicant responded that classes begin at Io00 ,,rte p.m. and end between 7:30 and 9:30 p.m. Tie further �tE stated that a change in traffic occurs at the hours � a of 3:30 p0mo 9 5030 p.m. and 7:30 p.m. o Popp further asked the applicant if, when his lease and the conditional use application expires, will he be seeking an alternative location o The applicant responded affirmatively. tj if y o Motion for approval (Popp) for a period of two (2) ,alp„ years for conditional use permit, 9 at `which time the permit would expire on September 30, 1977. o Seconded (Wakem) , rYk,� o Motion passed unanimously. 5,2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CU 20-75 (Scales an Tails Aquatic Imports) A request by Randall /Construction Co. and Louis Jordan permission paquatic pp y o:r p t � � an supply�»� company any Burton four to operate ty; ; at 8900 SW Burnham St 4 (Security Storage) . A Staff Reports Read by Powell. t; jav'A» Public T6,stimony y ��.�.µQ}µ+r"�p� (y+''�� Yry,�- q� J] �j f iA� � Matr .. +�}�•F�yy«ns F.n^o' Ae s s`.N'e si 6ws.+wl5M' S atmpi+v+y�F1 «a Y. D M y�I pry � A'1 � � .4 y�A 1 ii 1"" � 0"1 1�+ r iF�Y N ka�W? fY �'S�' O. hg .:9s, `tatd that a q" c �~ ��,4 » p appear available et this tidin for , employees as stated in the staff repot v was IT'R .neessary beoa.use them mould, oe employees. e further stated, tAat ane van and q �n: Y" 1'`.L C�J.�.CI. is �n tt'uJ»"�i.�� process �.L: a e also stated tated that clients ,t'i appointment only and there than 1 client and employees ees at r .e t ,be ~ 'p y site iK q' A. o Na ,tman asked if other than tropical. ars » t » sold o responded that onl �� � take place and not retail sales o Sa"4ata a, ked hours `reration. sit '{ 'r' ,, 6'M5M11111wt+!eWa1'M _ t'$" ta'" 'KN,;",�yF Jr",d A,^"�^ttr ,T,11?";l+W.ntvj"'"iry1r"'"p+�q:T^a'}i iur .try4Y �:.'. w. o��:, +.f a .;,r s,...,+.A; :;1 �r• , , a i i .. zy!;, t>y4' ,Mary ti'tw Si' 1 f,�it ( Y 1. Y'aa; w a Y�`ar �,r{ age.3 C minutes October 7, 1975 v }i u„x o Applicant responded that the operation hours would �Ay` be 9:00 a..m. to 2:00 p.m. C. Pub1io Testimony closed n. Staff Recommendation: APproval based on earlier Planning rir"rti Commission action for permitted uses at tilis location Ir"y a� 1,'c�n4 E. Commission Discussion wA$,1 o Sakata asked if we were opening a can of worms by permitting thio use. pp. asked if addit onal eating and ventilation is O Popp required , Qr ,the fisi tankzs t o Applicant responded "yes". } approval rt'r , Motion for (Porter) . , ,u+fir' Px o • Seconded. Wakea) o Motion passed unanimoUsly, Sakata abstained. Q 75 ( e/ .U37 TigardAvenue/ Setback),� �'' Avenue Setlaaok air°d{"Sl4# � ARzA� � V 8 Mor�5sett 0 SW Anto al sideyard in �pla:cat�on for variance �,Qw an 8 ft. Aw ,t µ art I 7 zor),e. (continue. from September 2, ,L9751) , A. Staff Pcwel requestedhr"75 end Preliminary Plat appV l and Subdivision Variance rta , S 3-75 be read sequentially. Staff report was read by Power,. r7 {f n. public TeStiY ©ny o Glen McBride, 7075 SW Shady Court, stated he feat rP the project had abided by the e isting Tigard code and had produced a project in the best interests tlf pr Tigard. , r o Porter asked McBride if he had an agreement to p . phase the home where the Variance was being requested. o tms asked app :ioant if he had considered adding a garage to this o# . o MoTr�de advised he` ws not 5Ure at this time, oPopp asked applicant why he had requested e, 7 ft oi variance on the west side' of t ' he grope `by and retained nap�k'` 2O ft. .on the east s 0 e Vr ... ....vl.�Y,vcvv.ah;..::r a;.�r;r.,;a,+nr ��t• lynx+, �r,. ,"vu,i, �t, I„,.,�a, w.Y +,,Jr,'"'^u^nfttztiPMk,^'y,�y�^p,.:,tP, rrr..,rdrtu. ?at' tit+oP+., 4 ,%:i,,) 1 - to ti µ - (1 f p i tirdM fx�J. Page 4 Minutes f" October. 7, 1975 • o+ Applz,cant res onded by, saying: "to meet zoning code ?i at��,• requirements. and c9mplin enr the exist .g residence ll., 1�a, . f„Ear jv. _. o_ Popp asked appl .,cant 1-f_the resident on the west side t�h+y does not object to the 7 ft. ht, o McBride respon�ed , Y saying "no”, o asked what is to Prevent, owners of property' on { r + lots 12 thru 16 inbu.ildl.ng, their own entrance way onto 13th. PoWell r„�sponded that eone ft# reserve Strip could be retained the length of the frontage of t1'10sixb °1 t divi, ion on 115th for o Losing access 'to 113th. ,rf, C 4 Commissio discus :l oX"1 o Ems asked if 5 ft, walkways are standard for Tz,,gax If so a 3Q1 planting area was being proposed, x161 1?l, o Powell responded that 4 ft* sidewalks were being pro- . posed to meet this probleM. j , that a condition be Porter askedit it �.s rh ao9 , that..the sale o the house go through to the de teloper 'based on the 7 ft. variance, Porter stated that lot 2500 driveway access should be on to the unnamed subdivision street and not Tigard. Sty a ,w o 'Hartman concurred with Porter's remarks. Powell, stated that of lost 2600 i s to be � Powell ,stated� � part of ,the .. . � j a ' s'd'bd.�:v. s on minor :and artitiori is needed or the'. p r niust purchase the entire lot. developer e, „ o POP ter asked when the new street is to be ndt led x iF,Tf, Rartman asked that before. the, prelit`iinar can be �r p� � � � partitioning requir►ed; qq a � roved.... is' a Vii, nor acid S41'7` o McBride responded that, in order' to avoid or ar ^jL i land Partitioning:, all parties will be signa'tors off` the Plat, ar -an then steted thtat 'lots' 2500 and 2600 should �be' included within -the' plat. o Motion to aprore the preliminary Plat plt end>isubd irision fanonoe Parter) 'With the followingoondtioxs aI „ s�+++�-r-•-rnr+.+�5,t8N44$$�&3:. W r^+ot•.n<n,,y'14rr, mM[k...tW.t r(!+^n_,,:w.,.r amta.„ypvp. cy«,ww,.'} -,.vtm'eu4 t-�,�W� ,'.� ,N ti i"' •t�:'1! ,fi P'4 r',y,,�.. Lt• +ysy}r ESS,,xE Page5 PC Minutes ,. . October 7, 1975 1, Street plugs be dedicated at the end of each " ;tr street stub 2 0 A one ft. reserve strip be dedicated acng rear lot lines adjacent 113th. °f +, 3, That a 5 foot utility easement be dedicated h along the front and side yard ara lines with tie E back easements as required by the utility companies a i t't 4a That 40 ft. stub streets be developed with a 4 ft. sidewalk on the north side of each }++, tl stub and e, 24 t roadway, sj 5. That street trees, as approved by staff, are to be provided throughout the project, installed . and maintained by the developer until he vends c ,tli tax p,, the adjacent homesitss ,r�s1 6. A 5 ft. street dedi ation, curbs, sidewalks dewa�. S existingget avemer�teshatl be necessarys as Provided on SW utr iqv . Tigard St. to the edge of the plat boundaries. 7 n That all of tax lots 2500 and 2600 be included within the plat. o Seconded (Wakem) . tH}La , o Motion passed unanimously. e `V 8- 5, based on the approval to theapprove variance o Po made a ppsubdivision improve- ; tent of SW Tigard Std and the unnamed street witb±n 'ill the subdivision, 0 Seconded (Niooli) . r .s° o Passed unanimously. , „ S. TIdAR D CLINIC SITE PLAN - AeVieW and Con.sUltation (Garrett and t; Pacific Highway) Aq Staff Comments. lead by Powell Cy�Y . B. Applicant I s comments y ; o Eob dray o'bated there is a need for covert', ng s,n.d, filling a , a portion of the site ka o Applicant further stated that all major trees oan be preserved .;v..r..,. ..4`. d.'... rMn,14A1hilr40.!Mut,^. .:. k 1F4 Ai��?1�'6"yym'4,',*+<araM.A1N> ¢,'�',�y� .;M�r^��:'* .�«,!t.rw..'• ( .t 5 ti } Page 6 xiN , PC Minutes nt October70 1975 Z�Srj' o To date, applicant is still not sure of the location of the clinic. He further stated that this is a good site Without the road, but would be a bad one with the road. C7 Commission Discussion 4 ' o Popp felt that the site proposal was in conformance a + _ with NPO #1 land use designation for the area. o Waked corourred with Popp's remarks and favored this Gayi type of land use for the area. Secondly, he felt that this would eliminate additional curb cuts and a pro posed bike path on the plan was a good idea. o Nicoli oli felt that the frontage road as proposed by the Z:' NPO #1 Plan would have a negative effect on this site proposal. o It was the Planning Commission's consensus that this ' was a good site plan. There was no formal motion and no vote was taken on this matter. rr r,, 7. ZONING 7 residentialONINDI zones)AMENDMENT ZOA 5-75 (Duplex lot size in �l �ON'ING ORDINANCE o es) continued from September 16, 1975 A request by the City of Tigard to amend Sections 18,20.020, 18.200030 and 28.20 040 to increase the minimum lot size L,a for duplexes in an ,-7 zone and decrease the lot coverage permitted in an R-l5 zone. r , A. Staff Report: read by Powell. B. Public Testimony a d Staff Recommendation: approval i D. Commission. DiSoussion o Popp s''dated he favored the proposal • o Motion for approval (Popp) . Seconded (Ems) :• ,;M 0 Paseed unanimously. !` 7..2 ZONING ORnINANC8 AMENDMENT 20Arrr+. (Poe Schedules) A, Staff Report'.' Road by >' owe11 d , .. .,.•. 'd,.• mM+.,,:.:wtl,vrFa,,�'irmrHC MKrd:J'.4 X7'.7 Y,Gi;'•Nr,,tl�,d ,)V�LrynxAaMk„M+MMa rrtt,PS;."r_ixmyrvr•kam+IMzfy N�+,Y^,. ,. uw _ tyt3; exp ,.4IM r, 4 44 Page 7 I,x. PC Minutes ;fel October 7, 1975 B. Public Testimony • ��Ir • s C Staff Recommendation Do Commission niscuss1.on ti o Porter, stated that he felt the f fee schedule should be in the form of an ordinance and not a resolution. a rfrI ;1 ` Motion (Porter) to recommend that this item not be fk acted on by the City Council at a regular public hearing until the Planning Commission was give' 'wR additional t me , to examine and discuss this matter at its next study sessions iS{'rr o Motion seconded (W .kem) a o Approved unanimously. r ,Y 9. OTHER BUSINESS: None. 106 ADJOURNMENT o 10:50 p o m • " 1 Ott, A f� • ° F�tS �F. r A sr• x � .4, � wRrxM: ibt� r h:. 1'w nk.t'.. �s+k;+1,xr.'1°7, na^ypwgv f i et..!'Ita"«r�w.rMJNk«h�mxi"tY"ri"a' .eti:. ti"tlk.�A .tldx Yy�, R Y .f x N�',�R f r 1 �t�'� 1� ° 4 },!•N,.. R` ;T' ,, �:-: � ,,,..: Nzw7�tx��'� r1°tl!i C,$;�,MW l.�j,atlr�+R'�K{k' ,'?9M'"l..Y.,?..,. .TY �- -Ati, .,.,.i}°3 r'"l. .''v�4!,,,.,!wM,4"�Y1 IK^+�'i�,xC.'�:s A r�..�_ .d#•iB,l I. .r Ylww.,, $.-,;(.R o, +�'v>r r+Y„,,tr^ .xrl..,. • . uu,..i.:-..r..tiM.,...=..�rv.Y.,,Imm..m...l x. :a,lr..mid ,„,„,,,„ .o ♦ 4 �'. ..I::.a LJ 1 '.'.',4'.‹'. . Report 1"✓✓✓ ' Staff. ,r TIGARD PLANNING COMMIS }:�..JN Oc.tobex: 7.. Wu 1975 ' is � Agenda Item �'7. 1 ' ' 40A 5 -75 ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NDMENT ` A request by the City, of Tigard to amend Sections 18.20.020, 18.20.030 'and 18,,20„040. of the Tigard Municipal Code to in- c - ' • num lot size required in an R�-7 Zone :and de - , cease the m.riir pr • theoverage allowed in an R-15 zone for duplex or . � crease. 1Qt c � _, 4 two family use indin s . Staff F g - r la R-7 Zone ' r , . ' The ur o e for allowing -wo family, and duplex housing: ° T p p nt:i:al zones a_s more to 'allow variation' a g. family" reside ++�'nlef y ; w an„ . in'� . . thatordinarily ril duplex use yand- style r a _. house typo and- st le than-it is to al to increased r density° When it is considered, is Y allowed On, sites difficult to develop..dor sin:gl family use • y or industrial district., CP Cher due to adjacenc to a commercial rI and/or due .t6 a• need, to cluster buildings on one part of a e so that the remainder of the site mat remain open) , it , becomes obvious 'that. the.•..ase•of the duplexP 1 asanotion. t . permit development of otherwise difficult or unattractive g _ place of the ' ' sites has outweighed c hborhooddenva_ron.men 1 ,of h duplex' in the nei + i r veness g , ,.:_: : he a •rac� use and development for by l imizthg residential e to u e an ': .,.. of du?1ex p the economic attraction that .exits for, manypeople occupancy off' a two »farnily dwelling. . Tihe policies ofthe TigardPlanning Commission with r60p00'6 .. .,� � � , 3�'0 .du lex development, : . . .subdivisions have led to somin ,:� p in ,,owed. b„ the: minimum site . in de, nt al. Y consistencies velopme standards :presently in `the zoning code For .in .tance, : the qu the setback for both streets, . code re wires a full. front y . site standard that reducesathe buildable area of corner ' a is e.. one'r by 8 to 121 if much a site. Were developed : + R�7 z ° ' 10-�s 7rxi an usable'ng1.e '�ama�l°y hori1e (750o 80.':., ft� �.ot 75 xl00' ) ; he' as 8' sa� y buildable area.'would 1e about 2000 Sq.' ft and the us would be at most ,. : . « 'area/play� and 'V� - . � ' . outdoor la.vting area play �' 00� sq . ite 'but. 8000 s rmily,A 0) r would have an appreciably larger buildable area (about 25 • ',r' ' larger) with about 1..8% increase in outdoor space, whioll would then be split between two users,; giving each about '700' sq„;: - ft net usable hack yard: -,-� . nsitay standard f'ro . m which the` R- di .7 The de zr�ne str'ictW is h allows' 4 units peri g r e h ossa' � A�-�e ded ' aC i derived . uctin w g r r o tma bel:,.. 80Y of �t�,...e , . W s-���eets from an R�-�' zohe �.�s`I�r�ct_� • a.pp._'' x y y able] i . area tis devel o pu .,�w o . land r p n the ` ' i all .b . -re ]..e �u �' �t�unt.e • that anotneedS her le.rge area are o0ns�de d it F. , r y” nwr+w..Wa,+.wwrw.wwms«rw q.w++pq+�.iWrr+rcMrNAa^Yf"R733A2+YJ. m.ua.i. ,,, „, •,:.. ,• •.• ,• •,4 }:I,, . , RtMA dw r WM-wWlwawmra, .1. • This is . o � .�. parks. r 10-20f is a up by schools churchesd •w the ' net" acre A net acre, assuming twat about 70% remains for development, would then be 30,492 square feet., . This "net acre", then, would accommodate four' single family resi- dences 3a8 lo or p7.6 dwelling units (at 10,000 sq duplees foxy ft./building site there would be 3.05 lots/net acre or 6.1 dwelling nits per net acre) . It is the staff's` feeling that, the allowable maximum densit for any site under a conditional use ought not to exceed 1.5 Imes the otherwise allowable g comparison, it should be pointed out that the density- 4' For c p : mum Coverage of a duplex, o n'..a 10,000 sq. ft. lot would maxa typical be 3500 q, thous 'coverage require- ft, , which exceeds duplexy 1600 to 1.700. s q. f t. , , merit fox' a -two familyor house b land,ft. ( .,. , usually more likeum leavingnot less than 6500 s and _ ver '� h (as suming minimum • X3000` s ft. ) . q of uncovered of wh�.c ,s „ front 0 sq. ft. of backyard (or w , setbacks:} from .3000 to x+00 could be available for recreational' ._ 1500 to 20(.70 sq. ft. /unit) -�, .'' Use. In other words, the :result of increasing the lot size ' for duplexes in an R--7 zone from 8000 sq. ft. to 10,000, sq. ft. would be to triple the usable .outdoor living/recreation -4 .•••space 1I. R_l5 Zone The z two unit/gross acre density zone. ' The net densitynis�arrived at here exactly as in part 1 preceeding.' The impact of duplex development on. a 15y000 sq. ft. site is .it is on,a, .7500 to 10,000 sq. ft site, in area site covea 'e different -Chan ' minhallow able maximum build ( g � �on a T 15',000 sq. ft, lot ranges from 4800 to 5250. sq. ft. ; ho Never,. few du lexes excee: r p d�2000, s q r f t. coverage, including garages and backyard remaining typically would range from 7000 to 10 000 sq. f�t. se of , a triplex built 'on such' a lot, o Ineach�uni=t would e ;,ceed substantiall the the backyard f r Y backyard possible on a' 7500 sq ft, lot for single, t'amil use. III. 11,30 Zone In taffs poin�.oor� duplex in this one is compatible' �� u lex use " f neither with the comprehensive plan's typical suburban ` land estate w . � ��,use nox� with: the economics of a 30,000: sq. ;ft: minimum lot size. Summary of F'in ixgs, r r 1. It a p ears that the 8000 sq, ft. minimu�i lot site ;fore duplexes' pp in an zone is presently not sufficient to provide adequate i familyuse. At a l:ot site of 10,,000 .j usable open space�f���`iwt�1ere is spade for light and air and s . ft. for duple , p q , ..�. .� y..p . � , ppito-� - open n ., ..p .. + .,. o . . ft. tat. �saolo e e:n, S ace ermfatn�-hc�us�ov` dad cor1'1� ��able -to that row= i% a single fa ily 7500q ' 2. The s�.te .standardsapplicable . j,In an R-15 zoneflow sufficien.�t area for light; air and reoreation with. no increase in lot Size for duplex use, In that the usable open space available far each family exoeods. that neoessar'y to meet minimum fama ly (f page ,r staf± report 9/16/75 - item 5.2 W4nV1:'nim pl*'^4W"„y/.'wN'^W'"1«++M1uw+.mw..x.,x...+«w.»......,.,r..,w... m+'M.wJu.+..nw.wM/u+"n".p.:+M wrvH.""+"'t^°"^'"y'1`":P 1 i. ,,,,•. , '... a .Ju uo w.,..,Hr«... ..- ' wry. •.i, p ...... ...3 ......i.r.,,r a ' needs by nearly 2 fold ' the: same consi 'erations that apply 2 in the R-7 zone do not necessarily apply here, s lot coverage practical in,an R--l5 zone and, in maximum ' act, in staff's' opinion desirable is, in the vicinity of w .$ p 7 9 .7 : 3000 sq. ft. , closer to 25% lot coverage than 35% presently }., allowed. , " 4. The present setback requirement in an R--l5 zone is twenty �y, Y' • foot- very much out of balance with a lot size of 15000 S J sf-t. and a net density of two families per acre• , ' r • . +. • . . _. t opinion is that in order to allow the kind of environment contemplated in this zone, a more realis is street setback would be 30 feet: Similarly, the 30setback foot• in the 3 .' less than 40 ,,feet, although. that may • , be3cOnSidered skiMp not As setbacks were not intended to be py discsstaff report but have been dealt with asA • u,�sed in this a result. of staff initiative, no recommendation Swill be made . concerning this finding e ,.. 5 • The intent and purpose of the R-30 zone. is to• provide a sub- withstate -hype development. Two family environment with e l.�rban u compatible ' se may be this enviroiment in 'the case` of r'' ^ ended" or two generation family, but it does no- `, the e a_ ear t �`t • � hat -bile, duplex dx lex a such is either intended or des�.�.�able� p p g in -the R 30 zonin district. • 6. The conditional uses allowed in residential zone districts 1 .. • ; in Tigard' "g ,include. .many, other uses besides duplex ,use not appropriate on minimurn� s ' ,specified ,those zone di��tr' ' Size sites s ec�f�.�ed zn • acts« For instance, institutional. uses such ,as churches ceme Caries; prks,� ,p , >.yg- hospitals,• nursing homes, + d rounds . schools, and children'-rs da care centers are subject onlyto scho l Y m _ " 0rari ted, ' .. • a ''' 00 '8'(1..,� f-ta. ma.na.munl site size in an R�-7 zone. the thiry-five% lot coverage requirement would tend to reg= late the scale 'of. .such an enterprise to 'the size of the lot, but the fact that such use is possible on a site of that size of ite siz ` umsrustinent in s e , -aff. minim momeorosuch usea•sma, be aosubject of a future detailed r, study, • , ruf . taf , ecomifiendation i , r! ,. Sta±f recommends the following amendments be. made to Ch. 18, TMG:, .x,:: .,. based on findings ,above: 't,,,,, • 18 20,0g0 Bond tional Uses ' ,. « . . • .. r ' Duplex x�esa.denta.al; with a min mum lot size of eight, W thousand square i'eet'i .� µone -duplex .per ,.lot; . • w' 1' .., ' be smotid d to read: , -'1. # : (i) bupleX residential on any '11:-.1 or,11-15 zoned site .but ' i, . not, oh an R30 zoned toned site; pr'ovid,ing that only one. P y, dpi � y � any e niar �e erma.ttcd on one ' 1ot. a ,e 3 staff r0150t - 5/16/i75 - item 5,2 •r r 1' { 11 Y N. I t 4 • fYr , 'f .... wVrnrs. ..�rnpts.Ym4YWlV'rYtM'.1.M .••n•w ^w..uw .,.-....... .,..r.ma. • wMw+Mw • I...i:r.: rr .ngr�¢n1.w.,r. roYee�evry n«-«o•r r r�r,e -. ...,......w +r+-+n*�ztrgtMt ,:�t.rairvrG,xx4vrd.a.q... .y r� • , '.�eY� �++tn.ar�m.r .-r lmn,rw.-1.rnr.'Mr..wA...fr�..a.N�'..i#��i-d4M!:! r M t,r r{�-Nr*.H:.•�'v`Y 4'lA(akJY d,FY.k,'d'w.tMf NManh.^.+.'PCClr1`C�k'^...Yr"�wXlk.C,;�.ti..4tlY'$,4Y+—t,4'.'" ...a,,.4,,h,.4vAi.. a s• r 'df 18.20..030 Lot 'Siz R-7 Zone i . - Y 1 , r 1 the minimum lot area shall be seven thousand five . hundred square feet. . .. , .4 " . be amended to read: . seven thousand five th' ma♦nimum lot area shall be use« a , ` hundred square feet, excepting for duplex , { (2) The minimum lot area for duplex use shall be ten thousand. ,, square feet. . . ,,. The maximum .o- coverage shall be 3 %. - . x 18 20' 040 Lot Size . R--15 ZZone • , M (2) The , � • maxiinun lob coverage shall be thirty-five percent. , . Li, be amended to read: r• .. (2) The maximum lot coverage Shall be twenty--five percent. Iii 1 y ,1 r 7j I r G ♦ ` { lAi 11' y ♦a .f I. • F I , , 4 ,• t 1 • 0 y F J� t 1 • ♦ '!.. t Y lljj 11 pa -e 4 L= staff` report — 9/l /7,5 - ben5,2 t% r+ a f rtM,rMM.»,M,M-,wSrd.nue.3+Y a�:,RiLrN•,wK gnaw ow Ya1,M -• "a• hrV^ , nrw^.'WYwn.RrccM'�Ir'I'4.xANtyFl.gYaR:a1S L4A,1MLab YY.,NN�avaw. +4N�"MW' . • • • rs :r.ir+,,.vAx_,.,+rta'...nr ''a,. n.r.,4,. r.Y.e...5ti:.,:n.1.'.,-.ni rnl.,+..rrwr,-..+.,,.,r 1 .... a ♦1..n.PmiU...........,..._,11..r .. ..,.:+ mw r..+...,w+.+..... .-,r„ ....n....-r-r,M. vr,.:n+...-rrrwr+rn.:r}.vr✓•n+.aWS:nvw..r.rvw.�, ..r-.r..v. +rrn.-..n 5 M TEjQ u Tigard Planning Commission September l6, 1975 Twality Junior High School. 14650 S W.'. 97th Avenue,. Tigard,", Oregon 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Hartman called the meeting to order at • 8;05 p.m. 2» ROLL: CALL: Members present: I- Hartman, 1n senn, Popp, Porter, •Sakata, Smelser, Wakem, Ems and Nico`li (late) , staff Bolen, Powell and Laws :. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES o Minutes of August 19,r 1975 an.d September 2, 1975, were approved as read. (Com- mssianer Nicoli arrived after approval • of minutes and asked that his name be included in the minutes of September 2) . • 4. COMMUNICATIONS.. , None 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN' 5.1 C OMPREfEN VE PLAN REVISION CPR 3--75 (City of Tigard/ Sz N.P.Q #3- Plan; Commission discussion and action' continued from September 9 1975, special meeting requested by the City of Tigard ` and N.P.O. #3 for P .anr ing Commission recommendation of #5 the NP.O� `" Plan A . Chairman Hartman addressed the Planning Gommissian and summarited items which had been brought up repeatedly for the Commission s considerati:Onr 1, uaarde St. ektension Arid widening 7 ? %keWays and pedestrian faculties on Ga.arde 3. E t,teneion Of commercial toning along Caarde to 11th B. It was mo ` the N.P.U. Plariwith ved (Popp)' to recomniehd addition of the corrections and changes sugge,eted, by the. Planning CommissiOn: ... r bicycle/ I, That the Plan include a statement a that pedestrian path be 'rovided on 12l8t and Caarde as soon as possible That stop s�gns be provided ry at certain key. iri, 2� ter=n . ra .e sections on both l�lst and Gaarde to d�scou g through tra, fro r Nrwy.e»***4�n. r,.v:.Mq.J+.rne+NrrrYMMYe•H+++.trn v.wMYiv'IT....mrlvww+,r ....r ^N.v.nAnr rr+nv1lM+vw..rrwYgWa'".k:-..rm.+vvp(fl.MA14N'NC'VY• ?1YN k'iV.T.NA'JtIaGItV'U,¢Wr7tJksyrvlX..y.yyv1 *' rr rt r. ,.•.. .... •...v... x'..:.n..i. ...nw. YP.:,,.a. xti..N.: n. I,:`. JMI' o.t•'✓ •u,..x awSMmnl+'N.Pn.•vll^^+v,mr w.e.•.Mi X.. t ,...w.'. „».....:. .... :...., ,. ... . +. •. .'. d rwa.aoa.,.nt..,H.,f.w.,rwtC...k,t;3„u.t:µ.e<,..i.•..d..,,.,.4.x.-,a_x._n,,.-a'. .u, .YN••A.t,.«.,.ttx':'mU').Q.4f..,R.A..-•.Y1:1,.. +...1'h„dz, ,,.,1;•s�rfin.6falw.'µ.a„rrr,n:h;.6.A••w�,r:..,.oe.r.r•M-u..F.,,•."tin.w+�k#iL.t.M•v,A.:w, ,•f,.•H•d.thS...rt:.,Yrw r:,.f„i•.a.th.-..wT...:P..: tx.hai..;.,..aaa(M.,,,•rs.�,. .f,. r pc. Minutes page September' 16, 1975 f 3. • (Extensinoof 110th Ave, to Gaarde) . H . o Seconded (Hansen) o Motion, failed, for lack L.Of Han.seh, Ncoii PoppSakata ayes° Hartman Porter Smeiser,, Wakem �. . nay; Ems abstained: ) is presently o Motion porter to 1•eave the .area Lhat • coned C-3 on Pacific Highway a.g delnated retail -com- mercial on the plan, redesignate the area behind that 0- "on the north side of Gaarde• (shown as retail commercial) as comiiercial professional, redesignate ., • . of that, up to 110th, as apartment that area north' residential and redesignate the remainder (not other-- Wise, designated) as single family residential; and g furthermore -a , in those reas designated retail-com-- mcrrcal to •restrict high traffic generators. o Seconded '(Hartman) on condition that the motion. be •..:, r � o is Part A Concernin the separated �.nto two par ommercIal pa.ofes5i na Highway' rn•in::.' the area adjacent Gaarde St, ry Part $: conce d c �. area on Pacific H� hwa an That condition w •as acceptable to Mr. Porter; V' o Motion A failed £or lack of a majority. Motion I3' passed. o Motion )� to 'amen.d the plan to more strongly • (Poz tier recommend -that bicycle-pedestrian ways be placed on all collectors and arterials and that they be of "h.i.ghest priority" D. Seconded (Wakem) • " o d Motion passe (unanimously) " o Motion (Porter)' that collector streets be confined" to eXi8ting righ.'te-of-way whenever pos8Ib1e and that widening of co1:1ectore 'through resident .a area be done only when. needed to alleviate traffic congestion or hazards, <, O` seconded Nakeii ) i; o Motion failed: . } o Motion (.i''brte ) to amend Plan, to include the P ••nr�� ap ro r�ate �o encoura eeoie `-to deeI".n ope n space and Farm deferral pr'ogramns. and/or any prog , � ky .I L. .r,r . rn r , •• ., .. • n r ,rr. .. a. r r>.i r , r .r. n i .•.. r c s ^I i.. . i . .. ' nryµhM,Sw�,�ryn,K.nrro N4:dYw.n•,wl�ru;,'.Aly.w.nwan,lN - _. ,� ,` n.e... e w, re .• ,x+.wy......,.w .m.w.y....r• wf,,. , In ,.. .. ...+..... ,.•u ,rte• page 3 }• PC Minutes ( September 16, 1975 • y s p Maintain privately which ma a�sa.st a ',Person, to owned .land in open space. o Seconded (Smelser) • • o Moraon caxrued, popp dissenting o Moved (Hansen) to recommend realignment of Gaarde } , with `McDonald. o Seconded (Saktata) . o. Motion carried. ` Moved Hansen to recommend approval of the NPO's • � o,a . . ,., 30 ft street width recommendation. o Seconded (sakata) o Motio1.1 passed. o Motion With'(Popp) to close d iscussion and forward N.P.O. PlanningCommission recommendation to the • Plan ouncil with amendments as approved by the CityC Planning Commission: g o Seconded (Hansen)'. o Motion passed, Porter against. 6. PUB ,IC HEARINGS NDITIONAL USE PERMIT RENEWAL CU l2-72 (McCM 6.1 CO lements/Tigerrd S6hoo1 of Gymnastics) A 're ue st fora two year renewal of a oonditiona : 1tse permit to operate agYOnastio, school f'n an M-4 zone at 9800 SW � gaxd Ave, '.'(Tigard Indugt,i41 Park)* o Moved (Sa' ata,) to table the item' to October 7 as the • applicant was not, present: o Second ed �'(smolser) o Motion carted Nicoll against: 6. ZONTNa ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 5-75 (Duplex Lot size in Residential Zo es) n. A 'request by the City of ' igerd to amend sections 18.20 p2O, 18, 0,00t and• 18.20:040 to increase the minimum lotsite p, , ° ', 7 Zone and decrease the lot coverage for d�� lees gra: an R� � permitted, zone. ' ,rwr.,weew,wnn_�e.a..r.,,rw,u,rr•'an+rn+wyorw ne,Np�'wn+•c«r+ate•-•••w,.r...,•.w.r.—, pa,n..wa.::+..Hu..+wto'_.r,mayF.,,s'ra�wtatju:irm-Ver.:tzrfMYtJ.'Cy=kfaaesratu5lsuwrsritw,bw5atcbA.uur yyY y .,;; .„ .,:• _ x :::J.w.iti.::r Jh4,.G....C'.5{5n.9nmXA9-N'.•`.'n., 1.«...;f:,.t'n pp, 4 F. minutes September 16, 1975 o Motion (Popp) to table this item to the next meeting. o Seconded (Wakem) o Motion carried (unanimously) . 6.3 VARIANCE , 8-75 (Withdrawn� ( Prior to the meeting at the applicant' ;&s request) 7. SUBDIVISIONS Y. 7.1 Preliminary Plat Approval and Subdivision Variance S 3 75 . (Withdrawn prior to the meetingat theapplicant's req uest) 8. PRELIMINARY PLAN AND PROGRAM REVIEW 8.1 PAYLE►SS PLANNEDDEVELOPMENT A request for concept approval of a commercial planned development at SW Main and Scofflns (old Fowler Jr. High School site) A. Staff Report: Read by Powell B. Applicant Presentation: Mr. Hummel, representing Payless, market study defending theneed for y , presented a j g _g ..g . . He explained.a-�he current store in Tigard, Oregon { situation that Payless Drug Co. foU d themselves in and introduced Mr. Ehman. ,r o Mr Richard Ehman architect for Payless, de�non- ated the Planproposedshowed. ._ e Commission str .. the alternatives theyhad . and the explored in arriving at that plan. C. COri.ission Discussion and A imctor �` (Wakem). � the Plan to Design. Review ,� .. � Board the o Motion W�kem to for�`ard development design review of t ...,. planned velopment overall design finding that the con-- dept of the plan generally was acceptable and that the applicant's presentation was sufficient to enable plannin h g comsria.ssibn earing of the matter.: o seconded (Popp) o Motion pawed. 9. b HER BusINE88 H 941 URBAN'IZA 'ION BOUNDARY D8TERMINAtIO1 r Y ..wM..ih"415rLi4.rrNW w .xN r a MM`•rIr Mt rx r, -nrv»•r...-w.......wmyr wiwnvms auMww.w'whM+i+wre. ¢%5F{(YIWYIJY1y'NWtPIYY4.W1iM...{ •,.n, • ,. . r.. .. , z.. ,,,,,,,,.....1,..,...,....,,,t:C:,,4,ti,g Y,,,,re.U. 1"a.5.:.,",14', .,M„44-.1.1. i 4,3,.:.,?0,'c'z•.,, 44 o,.- . ,' xa x.:S7«1.4,-94,1,..,44,,"...AY.AE,,,,,r4i l'.'S�N 4,'r,.......t?-.ksk41,,,,,A...Y,f.;Jrt3S A..,,_X.J,iU..L F••i.� 4.�,.,,Aa....,.it,,,,,4.744,.,r� `,,, ( PC , mutes September 16, 1975 7 A 1^equest by Washington Coul'ity and CRAG for City input .. .i into their attempts to determine the areas susceptible t to urbanizati s on around' the City of Tigard. o Motion (Popp) to tab�.e. this discussion, to the next meeting. o Seconded (Smel.ser) o Motion passed. (unanimOusly) 10. ADJOURNMENT: 11;30, pat, • • • } 1 i 4 1 i : • ' : fi ' , - ' ' , .; ', . , ' \( Vii: • w .. �«...�.+.r...�= ,.•+4r<.:..wr,...,„,.r,ry,.;ar Krwu•r.n w..,,,Mwv...,... r...., ,.,. ,,.,,,.w..-..,.a .,....w.u.,r,.:.n«w.... ,.....,,;,...,i,,,,„„,..,„,.....,,,,,, r,., < ,.. ,,. r , ,, Staff Report ... TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION September 16, 1975 'a. • Agenda Item 5.2 ZOA 575 ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT • A request ;by the City of Tigard to amend Sections 18.20.020, 18.20.040182 of the Tigardin anMunicipal Code to in-- , ' crease the and the minimum lot size requiredR-7 one and de- " crease the Ibt coverage allowed in an R-15 zone for duplex or two family use. { Staff Findings I, R-7 Zone The purpose for allowing two family and duplex housing in °°single family" residential zones is more to allow variation in house type and style than it is to allow an increased , density. When it is considered that ordinarily duplex use is allowed on sites difficult to develop for single family use (either due to adjacency to a commercial or industrial district and/or due toto cluster buildings on one part of a site so that the nremainder of the site. may remain open.) , it becomes obvious:'that the use of the duplex as an optionto permitp otherwise difficult or � � unattractive . : dev'e�l,o merit of . consideration of the place of the , sites h.as outweighed co duplex . in thene ghborhood envi r.o,n.mentr , the attractiveness • . of duplexdeVfor residentialse and i the economic attractionthat exists for many people forowner ner • occupancy of a two f atily dwelling. • The policies of the Tigard' planning Commission with respect p ind to some in-- � s�ibdvisions have le . . elopment consistencies ' p by the minimthn site in development allowed . StandardsPresentlyin the zoning code. For instance, the code requires a full front yard setback for both streets, 'M a site.. standard that reduces the buildable area of corner � lots in an R-7 zone by8 .to 12%. If such a site were developed •,. as a Single familyhome (7 00 sq. ft. lot, 75 .. the Usablex 100' ) , the g buildable area would be aboUt 2000 sq ft and outdoor living aea/play yard would be at most 1200 sq. ft. r • , 0 sq. ft. for .duplex�. ; A s�.zn�lar site `but S00 for a (80 x 100) , appreciably larger z buildable area (about 25/ ) ' would ..have an ° ,. ith �abou.t 18/ increase n" outdoor space, wh ch wou d larger) w then be Split between two Users, giving each about 700 80,. ft. net usable back yard t The density standard .from which the .-7 zone district is derived allows 4 units per gross acre. After deducting streets from an R-7 zone distriot, appoximately 80/ of the land e area are large is develo .y,able. when the public �u.se needs of a ,Cons dered it is usualfound that another ....: ,:'. , .. ....... .........�.....Hr�� .,.,...,..yr kPM�t+.r�+t^MSf3,ee .Ncl®!+iPSJWiSitu'EJ�L'A+x1..',V.uYrK.�tq�u �N�. ��r.L,L • • 10-20% is used up by schools, churches and' parks. This is the "net" 'acre A net acre, ' assuming that about 70% remains for development, would then be 30,492 square feet. This "net acre", then, would accommodate four single family resi- dences or 3,8 duloxes for p 7.6 dwelling units (at 10,000 sq. ft./building site there would be 3.05 lots/net acre or 6.1 , dwelling nits per net acre) . It is the staff's feeling that • the allowable maximum density for any site under a conditional use ought not to exceed 1.5 times the 'otherwise allowable density. For comparison, it should be pointed out that the maximum coverage of a duplex, on* a 10,000 sqftlot would be 3500 sq. ft. , which exceeds the typical coverage require- ment for a two family or duplex house by 1600 to 1700 sq. ft. leaving not les than 6500 sq. ft. (and usually More like 8000 sq. 'ft. ) of uncovered land, of which (assuming minimum front setbacks) frOm 3000: to 4000 sq. ft. of "backyard"` (or -- 1500 to 2000 sq. ft./unit) could be available for recreational 1. In other words the result of increasing the lot size . �;F.. ... . use. , for duplexes in an R-7 zone from 8000 sq. ft. to 10,000 sq. ft. would be to `tr.: e the usable outdoor living/recreation space., I I, R-15 Zone The R-15 zone is a two unit/gross acre density zone. The net density is arrived at here exactly as in part 1 preceeding. Theimpact of duplex development on a 15,000 sq. ft.. site is 7500• q much diff�ren-t than it is on a to 10;000 s ft: site. e maximum building The allowabl area (site coverage) on a 15 .000 s , q. 'f t. ;lot ranges from 4800 to 5250 sq. ft. ; however, few duplexes exceed 2000 sq: ft coverage, including garages and backyard remaining typically would range from 7000 to 10,000 00O sq. ft. In the case of a duplex built on such a lot, the backyardunitantially the for each Would exceed substantially backYard possible on a4 7500 sq. ft. lot for single family use. I11. R-30 Zone In staff's Opinion, duplex use in this zone is compatible neither with the comprehensive plan'S typical suburban e���tate land.use nor with the economics Of a 30,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size. Summary of .Findings 1. pp 8000 sq.. ft. lot p •, s ,.xe 5 It �n RareZonetsh� nt nosufficient m�n�m�.m lot silo �'or du le. ' , . y ,,y , . to provide adequate in --'� prose 1 t Su fic�en� usable o• en s•�ace for' two two family use. At a lit size of 10,000 r ; oq ft. for duplex use, there is Space for light and air and `.sable Open space pr°rfamily provided comparable to that pro- vided for a single family house on a 7500 sq. ft. lot. The s�. 2. Site standards: applicablein an A-15 Zone ealow sufficient' ) area for light, air and recreation with`no increase in lot size for duplex Use. In that the usable open space available for each family exceeds that necessary to meet minimum family page 2 staff .report, 9/16/75 item 5. a needs by nearly 2 fold, the same considerations, that, apply • in the R--7 zone do not 'necessarily apply here. 3. The maximum lot coverage practical in an R-15 gone and, in •. act, in staff's opinion, desirable, is the vcinity of 3000 sq. ft. , closer to 25% lot Coverage than 35% presently allowed. 4. The present setback requirement in an R-15 zone is feet, very much out of balance with a lot size of 15,000 • density. - families per acre. Staff's opinion iisdthateinorder tof allow the kind of environment P contemplated in this zone, a more realistic: street setback 30 feet. Similarly, the 30 foot setback in the R-30 tone -Should be not less that' 40 feet, although that may R 30 be considered skimpy. As etbacss were nt intended to be "� � discussed in this staffreport but havebeen dealt with as w, a result of staff initiative, no recommendation will be made , concerning this finding 5. The intent and purpose of the R-30 zone is toprovide a sub.- urban env�.ronmen�t with esta• te type development. Two family may theof use macompatible with this environment in case generation . .. . ...on �famil but •t does not ',extended,' � t 1 the. extended or two enerat Y. intended that the duplex' as such is either intended or desirable in the R"30 zoning district 6. The conditional uses allowed in residential zone districts in Tigard tnc....lude many° other usesbesides duplex use not appropriate on minimum sine sites Specified in thoe ,zOn e uch as churches s. � d m taxi S parks, la. roinstitutional uses sing homes, For instance ceserari , playg hospitals, nuz _ ° r ands . ,. : c t only to imam sie s�.ze in ari are. su,b�e , schools and.f�hi�l�dnen .�F daycare centers are gone. Granted, a7500sq the thirty-five% lot coverage requirement Would tend to re= late, the scale of such an enterprise to the size of the lot; but the fact that such use is possible on a Site of that size Some adu`'of a future d De a sub ect size .. . ....some concern to staff. � went in si eetailed sof , miniMUms for such USes may j study. Staff .Recommendation staff recommends the amendments be. made to Ch 18, TM. based on finding above 18:20,020 Conditional use`s . . 1 tuj lex rresidentialwith a minimum lot size of eight1,1 thousand sq quare feet: one,duplex per lot, be amended to read! : . (1) Duplex residential on any R==1 or R-15 zoned site, but not on an., 0 zoned zoned site, providing that only one duplex may be permitted on any one lot page9/16/75 item 5,2 .{,1.».-,5._.�,.....:u..��.k-�.,.5;::.n-aY,.-rt.+Lt. .w w.x. �.c. _�+.ro.. ..�. r w+.., .� ...a�,,,.Y K.-. 4_S».a:_u xu-nx.+...na:....r..7..,+._..m.av;.•-wMw4GkG.n.a;.G ruaa 11 �' 18.20.030 Lot'.:'... Siz emsA-7 Zone 1 the minimum lot area shall be seven. thousand five -'-` a hundred square feet. .' be amdendeto read: • l the minimum lot area 'shall be seven thousand five hundred square feet, excepting for duplex use; (2) , .-'The minimum lot area for - L duplex use shall be ten thousand,: e square feet. • (3). ".['he maximum lot coverage shall be 35%• • :' 18.20.040 Lot Size - R-15 Zone •,. (2) 'The' maximum lot coverage shall. be thrty��'ive percent. be amended 'to read t • r .'� 2 The maximum lot coverage shall be twenty-five percent. s , . a a , fl 3 r ,, page 4 sta 'f e1ort 9/16/75 - i eiri 5-2 . .M.M.1 ,, . 4' 1 4 X .UlMwv 1 1 rtx A.1„. F ,IvF t.;(V ,•v...lv ... .» r �ixJm .Wv4W r tlrr.rvt• W✓HJw4�A0r w weYm. �- ,ppumwa�rwrl�M1„'VWs.rws.ww.n4iw 4.:MW.lM4?�irYYf4 (N{( �"1' ,nu+m.wwt.. .�rry"^r+� Y-r. .........�, ,..«. »,�+.w • rrgmrtd mai,cr. a:wnswuasaccu�vsaatiw rw;n,wn++YY.abyfiy, /C Ao ny i e aro ,. a Li.t.' � iT " `. /off• ° . 2 el/ 1 1 1:' ` i i T �� . Y 1,0 / , , kut , , , , . , ,. 111)1,c.e)t S/07 e., ot.4,4.,0 7 k ,, i , ci, ' 0 7::;Ie cSi �� r ,.r I.• v v •.wa n..va.r......+ Y.,,Ps.,o-ty aMJe,,,y„rwrV,.•ww_.., .m.,•,......4- w......v...r«•.Inv.•.A.,...w.mw.•w.w.vw...,nN.,... wMfa/.mm3 plkye,xnSsa?W:r.+pmAtlmati4%mISLY,.as 4411ww J,I. �. I •, •. �" "• I , 1 . I lf �•.' , ' '• e r gr r n .. 'c.o. /00 in0 0 e 0 ! ie) ...._,Ito ,., r , 1s `I 3 f q 1 ,i ,.• F1 1 os... e(ott, roe ►iA 1 it , , L or,./0% , 00 1 0i ae) ,.,... . ,00 /4#A 13 flLi.. , i c, 04 1 r Z 0 0(ie.41}iir' ,410 8 CA') 1 (i , Or , • $4 f� a hw '• .i.......e_aYII.,unlN�.wvi9 4S w,.,,fnr ,r.n .. t.-•• ,�• •- _n...,«r..,r.....^.� .. ..o. ,nrw.a f rv! 31;A?9W.fNPoI FYiYI"M"A tl1SC"�M VW:W1Yv51u^Jrb�wN'^GiMlY-.� �� � , c i� _ �..r• , �S• it r .,.., a...a....a..v+ w!,:..�MFry..s;i.r�I. t.::'....,.n.•. :�.,, . �,. s.. 14..}m+'.Rba A..e.sx--:xre „-,µre+.. . +.5 }..i ry.,er .. fa,iu..w ✓ _ ., ui lw-rN.-w4-{-4'-•.rv,.4r_s.,e�.'.+.>,. ,. tnt rnf.:.. r':..I:M�4- .'' '. ' ' 7 71, ',, ,, A / ' i el'ae`°)E'''',f11)en ... 4, / , . ,,,i.., , , , .., 1 ,, ,, , , , ...,. .,, , ' , ,., , , ,,,,,,,,, ,i,-,, L.,c...,,,k,..i. '' . ' if .0 ' '' ' T I i F • II • 3 J 0 .,.,-.•• ^f, d• , 4......m.....,..........,.r kr•;t f.4 1+ I; r 11''''/isi,v diiiiic i 4 41 -"- yme,t)4 ..41'70 Z Z ' , I I ':��r,.l �..,,:i ....,i.".t ,r.:.1:Y w eu '.r.•"u x .�y rHaa...,,,........ ....�• 1 a ,• M,.,..I; YN aW.Ai{m'mS7ivAV�4:�!V ,amu«µ44p, „I• , ..,., ,•, YrV"`^�n«.:,..aM.�.«,.y,,..tia�macv.�'1 ri J.,b� b r „�Y .... ...nr � •.�+..+w..r,...,wwr�»,«,�x -,.,raw p +ry,»,q,:R apyc7n �nq, �,;�.s � • � Yr i �w. w „x. .,.?,xl.trJut .a'«.::-k.k...,,S.x,,,...µ.,ms„c.il..1.4..,,,..x,a,.r.47.,,.4r-.4..:,,..'G.. Y.7 .,, Y2a,' _ ,,,,...._.r.,,,.,,, ,.w.:,aa,zA'ak x.L.,1 4,a,r.i... + 4,i.'.,>:.. ,-y�7;',.,'-'',"..,''',.:,.,7,1";......,,,`,,,,;,,,, r,,-.'::*,t�"",''..!, ,,, .x.;r Tr.t... 3,,,,,,Fa "'‘.4;11,'',.',4-`,,,',,‘;', r Y*.hJY,1 g))W ,''' ', , `, 01a a • ,� � ..u', .,.•':.i`� .r9'F.r.„ ''4r' . , q ' •..M,. lW 5 � y N� ' i iJ�.v '':°,,:';,.':,:',',-.';,',',•,..;•''',. � ,,T �i3O”'' NYV”W, 6 « • i',fl 4C + M „ . j" M ,lav w ra.,i ui.te .W1' " „ "a♦ j • &'"6 Y� .''4 , a i' $ 1 ift. T 4 � ': :'. y� i it. '. ., ' ' '' u ' 1z • ' ,, .1''",' , , , ' ,' dvd ..* .rr« , a.: x C,y+Y,r, ii.,''+' M ('y� w't�W : `1,'.y ,x'+t ,*iP'bv/yv - . P',- , e• a " •• " :' 4r,q p,('. h4I ' ,+ • vii, 51Px`CMtyr'k ��x r�.k�n' "� t► y4, � t .4•' MC'"1Wra M .. f Y ' r wa + �"iY + ;tw! '''''*;•:` , r. ,C ;. '1 :, ',,,'',4,',,i,.,c"x � =r' ,yti . P orr ji' Y *4," . .: •5f.' ,; x�J� "''''4),f,''''''''''.-5,7,,','74.i.";,1,5, ' t phi ri^{ YNro'YW4LAA+' F1a ? w• + *.yyhr'4 ixhr x' + Jy:. w 1 i"w i ^111 ,1't' :qr r1t 'rw 'i ,. , , :w rr°i4;,-;.,'''''; + ' ,t.7' . + ''a '.,' wiVrr21rtL4k„,4^prAMy,. .t,ra .a ,,,, .r • 'fi ',rtw v My' + y y ' R qY ,.0: ,, . , $1:iJ'' r•4 i, • 1. 'µ. :: 4w`1:1ta:«sL�p�t' {l.�.a '�:.`L :.�w+.wuiw, J:. :.. «....v * u, y:a <..iw*A 4 » '.,;W.' . .":.,_ .......+..-++.u.. t+�....i.,�uay+....., t.,.1.14Y...,.... * .. .. . w .:,:,'. ...... d . +f a rf� / y�g AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ..--. SEP 1.5 19 '5` ,,...TE OF OREGON, i a :; . . U1 Y OF WASHINGTOrI', ss: kr, CITY OF. TIGARD . 1, ..._..��. .....-...,--..__M �..�-J,o.s,e phi.-.-.. char-er_-_.a___-.,_ :.... �,'14.:�N�', rii^ '..PUBI"1 HEAIRIIV��, ,�{�,�+x�..,. , C�'I'Y t'�F�TI'� ��(.,a,,,r, X�ri''�; � ; F ARIb ti., .�n: ,,I'L.;A.NI�tII�G`CUM �• .3 s Ing fust dilly sit orn, depose and say tha } r��:J�¢f � t I am thea pubUsher `.,,N itice,w is 'lae're�ygIvenI thaQ'�uhlcr'�' }t �,hea�ngs �d A .,f� of.The 'Tigard Times, a newspapar, of general circulation, as defined r Commiss oti'af;theCa bafTie` snningtf, �, . _ ;,, ;�valaty�,Jun�of'l�I'lgl Saha IatLectur��� .; ORS 193.010 artd 193.020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and Rao"m I1650.s 4'a w ► +WM.97fh'�veriue yT�g ,;� •' »�;.. � and r;Oregon.,Said;hearings Wjlt,oC'attr thif , , etcomb elri16,,/975;a'at 7:30;p�M�,w� ` te• that,the legal Notice a Printed' ne of which is hereto anne;ed was p pY r ' t //��x,11 t.',1,.y.�..., ,(yam{ and. .: . t i ( � V owlt't Y�i.Pl4�t, ,l Wl�' Tished �. . ,. p''',4P.,'''' � a .q. .,,.tY, f y �'`,'.,',Vip p . ' M• est'b''''wa`'ate .Mc�Ciem nts in the entire issue of said news a er for ..�,....�_.s.... ...._. s�iccessive Aid for renewal of aCbtldl�idhtj,=iis permit" 1;' ' i;r: ' too crate TigaI'd'Gymii'd tic S I►oo1*. sectbtive Weeks in the fold Wing issues :....____...,7_, :.��. i...?,:z:.,,,ria,,,,,uh,.::7,:vi.A., �4 zoii}e,at�J8 .�.....-� OO.S"'�lV.°Tl,"ard t ,j , Av septembe�r 7 g7� Parlc) �; 'fivec : c.,_.,-� .. , yryjCy11. ' e.�ues ,, ygad du.:._.:.�. , req. b amesections l3.l.VaV ;of�'�gard to;� I1, 1,4 I8.20.0 he t 20► ��P and ; Ocft 'i`1 30, �.. a_ ».., garc�M Coce•t , n of y F'" taireerease , .minim nt:9dt saes rig,. �. C+ gn fiure)i, 1`� �ncl,�n,,ires�cler�tial �bne1.4„t-fo � -m j t� W, ,r,,d., r Ti•, , r9 i, family.i se;,t kali.: .vi:. , �., • r w, i. ,i i h 4 tt��e✓r.S1.on5.. ilig'A,,,;rIrifei c�+•. r.'14 Subscribed and s�s+orb to before me this ir_.;_..�. day ---� be j�e`matteks are invite l tp. ter�3n"; .,.a•t,v = , AYf Y `Pr.,...ttend " ,., i4l•{d.,'i+ lf-r [I f� • r,!;�']f'i.I= M f or 25 , 1u}lish ept7 '1975 "t�s�'" opt �b � fi_ _ r;, ; ,. � , ..+.a ._ a . ? .... a... si 714 Y'kal4. ,.4 ' * ,ai,. 5r.1 y";,wit . P- , .,_..., , ' ..., . , ,:„...___:.,„„7,,,, ........... . . i Nota h Ptab'uc'of 0 o""+ ' ' 1.4) ' ' '''' '' ' '' ' 4 , tom' onexpiies k9..... , 4' c ____ a..,�+...st,..ww. alr.�'w :1 . ., .» , 5 i,,,,, ,.......„.:..WYr.„.,,.,..l+uwa:u.....aNt.,'u..........,iy .,....,.wa.S.r f«r«s:.•r ..—........f.....,..,—,.,,.,M...i,a,r ,.W... .,M-riu:.,,,,...ly. v�!......�.r...r...' -.W1...w:...,:..:iai:++H,.i'''..«.:,,.' I i. ,P 1li� ,,,. ;., .. '4*�'d' ,rft±f..,,�:,ir`dild'aiatMu^iwuw x. µw:�,fwx,rwaip.ww'»u, .x4trp..M,4�...^r.a wI .+,... .., .4i,.,i,..,+r,n,,, .h„i',... 'ts!,.F#...aa4 +t*+M.+t+....,,i..'.,-.,,*$.0140.Rr}fM W',i''''ir*"+'' .''kl''w4,+,rIt''uk'w.''',4*1*,,yi''*,rl,";'',t,*F*�f,'Mgt+ 'tq''M`C''hq s 4 t,,�'l"•,,-, . ........., sq,rrrauww' .r('n , ° . , , P, p W u i . {;ti "p , ,,,,-ii, ez,c ,-Ia y t44d` 9'''',,,h..', •.!,'' '1,,.1,',.: .;. ,k1 ^ ,,,�l,^e�pW'A / F't' , • a . . ;�( s ' .y w4., ,�,r ;.,,-....,',.'..,,,....'''', ..'...i .''''. F ,uq,,,',7';',„,',2, ,M«Yut.rr,., ,M,. ;.aw.a S{ta!4 '7''''': ,' r '+, o •'' . ; ''''',:'''''',7:-" � .'''',.',.`7'...,,,'...7.;,.;,;:,':yx,-,Ww,NwCxww,YHi'rH/M}11fLfilsriC=!Fvtsur,, ara�u..,.rw �wWwO.iit- _ . ti•'I , yr, c C.; i, j ,i., ., .. . . t,4,0 .--- . , ‘ ' d 4) �y 4 ,, i . - ' - , I . • gat,ts ' - - ' ' . 4,„5, Snt e,.., e ir eri.L $4'e.iie totie, , c,fe , .,,,,' 74(AD � r ilk 7 4l',. ', - '0 i has t Pi( p5tt .' ,, . ,,. 4„, ol..4, 10 me., I g s(`veS e' v ,z, 1. e . ' ' '°41.ut't*1.,4-44.,of-e. 4:1-.'f ,coriaeot4 c / , t 3t st3 AA 1 4 l • .4 __i_ . i .. 4,,,, .i,,,/ . . _ .- - ' "' a- I-, .4... ,a, ... ,,,, .....,$.;,.. ,,, , e.,), cociedlet it (!2j!',..t..u2e,..tti'. Kitiit 9flotsit ''')''', 7 . (2-,00c), sur''' . , . .• - (z„.6.c)o) .. . . , . ' --- , - ' (1_,,(9c. -t) ) ' °� 7 'o acs c� (zo0) • „,, , ' •`, ' ' (2..00 it::),) '''' / I 49 .°9 0 . k ''. 1 /S(9090 , t167. eZ5 , ,..,. ' '' '-' '' ' ,'J / . „..„ Ct.._,-5't')0.9 i x 00 /tope ,,' ,' , .. , )Cz 5a s'd ., :', i i:pii 00 b ' c9 °' `- '', . . _. , `2,.. H6 1) v*) , . . . , ... .., . , . ' ,„ , t idc.0c,/. ' 6 ''_.„4';.,'..,„;,.,.....;:,t,....;..„`..;.;;;,s7p•ry 6mts•'uzeefwrrN+,a duxu ^