Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
ZOA4-75
POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. ,ti$ �+e.1 r*' it-.r-- ,"_" . • .... v.`�°�"..."'�..e...o-n,. .;.p.,-' , r 1 Y 4'v ' 6ai y `'��'� t f. tls'"!pf,tkt `a it1 4t �°fit- '.1 i6,# ,, t'" 'rf� 't't' ^ r7ft,�'I, a;;f ,; vy , r�11ii7f2.4 1 7fay', e 0,1 y: - ' ,$'1 t t Itis 4l,"k•I A>. ),,, y .}jn'.;''Mi -'4' , ;i'; .y.� :,,'•••, 11 n- 1: :r, , ..'!t.' ,,,,;,: p: y(. +, .,11ri�''',4'� i n ...aAn4l:.i+rc,.Nn rr.'�rm n'.,1� ¢ t.+�n,nr +A'... Szr...d,`.d' 8. -,w ., ., *,, , 'r I '''''.44.''''''_:+: rt :n ,, :{l, /. t� I .'a .,,,., ,� .,.,..,..0.........„.04-.4,,,...1(.....,,,c, ..w,.k�'„•.3-.,»x:tml i ....tt°,.,. ,zc..,.uf, / tt _, r�y� I, 42+, i1}r �5 , �7 rva.n. o �n i,�iY{ i,., d. �.�'�1, +.N�•.�n.:.aa�.n��.,+�m,,,'�k1G v�',w�7hr�v,�"� �c««r.....�7...6...F�r.�b�'w.�.t•3� "..�.»..-111,4-:r,ia 4 P" *-:.�.. .,,�, .._,._ r ,c;"'�' rW C ..-ti;�:. rt-y��;: It 9.417i»iti'' .y").u H ,-T.-.;P',.,� .,I �4 f '''.0i:41,;; Y .J +",i ,, '4' 11 !1 t{r'V4'.‘417'''''1';''''''' �4t' .,,, � l''''‘,‘" �+ •^�i. {� (' �S•.t”,�3'"?l�Vl T,��i,'Z� �r<1( �rdl yel 1,5�:13'tdeYf�+'t•4�t��' 4 w T 4i' / J� f i l -4 C �,,k^,,�cy$ 4;'fi"1 ,x;00 AMEND. CH. 118.12, GENERAL a.' '1.' PROVISIONS, REGARDING CONDITIONAL` t ,'; ,, rte+r�,h J,1,f. , t,L... i7 a,4,} USE STATUS 3,,i.. �n;it'. '.'1,11?7 ,r}:.,.. �4ry,i t y.- .'r,' - i', ,.11 'f 1: 7"' G v�. ti �� ,{ I' a,f 'yr t 'f 7 t k F `'', ��, tt,�t.6 '���dZ� ,+ yfi�o� . 1�„fY,to,� �n�+4 �,a�I artt61 x,tki���„•�;'dva.x•.,{.a ,.}c J� r,'„ 't}kkt'' „ 0 AMENDING CII. 18.59, & .010. ,„,q; `z r''4 JURISDICTION & POWERS OF DRB ; ff: DSIGN'RtVIEW OAD �.{ ,,,„.,J,'., dnr�.ary.4 17 i,f,.�1y?t vi odak)1.'S,i 7r 7 a1 74r Ite,Jvn1Sr,an r' '1 4r7'f t Mt°;',fy' �y i tr7l(4'f','14h71.'t7 4in ' ;4 l Zone Ordinance Aendet ( OI ) „>�1,,, .... fi„we �, fia „ it 'Miry .. A t, w t Tv� ski H` ii J 19 ;l • +:''';i,°. i t`��l ti'} g l 1 1” +', y° ,•� ', .7 ,c''' 1i )1 , ,;\i' .t ,a,.D; P r, -4',,,k',;,',,., t.,+ 41,' 4d A7' y' fJ )),e 4+n ,1Y yty iI {;1r ,. ,. 4.4 11 I y}y .rr ski i Jy f' '.1 ,A,. .., '...:, . _.b#' ',d i:�1 .y ...4 >,.• ., ,y 1,�...,f,., Y :."::'"::::7:1-. '''':::',..7;,'''''4. ..4.ry- .+x-c :';-.'":.:4.'.'.:::'.'".1:' :.',:::',','1',,''..':.'..,:;::'-',,',;',. . A,., .'i"> .,'. , , ,N;/ 'M..18, , 1,. +lk...,:J , n. • ,. ,SytF J4 yraJ r#,Y, 1 7y s,4p1#d r"{1F`y!i' 1A 13 (a) City Administrator recommended the easements be accepted by the City. (b) Motion to accept: Councilman Cook; seconded by Councilman Bar'khurs b. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. pp ' pxesent. 8. RESOLUTION No. 7 5 47A RESOLUTION� - OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL REAPPOINTING A MEMBER OF THE PARK BOARD. • (a) Selection Committee recommended the reappointment of Terry McKee. i 1",nt •�� (b) Eorion by atertnCofricilman ofice exok n ri� June adopt Resolution 75-47 motion anand thereby reappoint Terry McKee mr� 30, 1979: seconded by Councilman Mickelson. l'1µ0e • Approved by unanimous vote of Council presents tf yal�1R1, ti 4 4N aCAMENDMENT - An amendment to Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 18 (Zoning)°, clarifying. ri hts of 9. ZONING ORDINANCE r ��} � ", � properties, ' � certain � has become characterized as aconditi nal Use ]arid owners with regard to use of which . a G after the date of the commen,ccment of such 1s 1,a4+ rn�PHPr t (a) 1?Ublic Hearing Opened 8:00 P. M. Statement of facts synopsized by City Planner. rr' r1 Public Testimony Irl, y rrY4� „1�z Favor_ Attorney Fred Anderson representing Great Western Chemipal Cori). and himself. Tes timony Opposed none 14� Cross Examination - none 1, t1y� Public Hearing Closed (b) ORDINANCE No. 75-42 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18.72 (CONDITIONAL USES) OF 'i F ( O1�AL tJ � ) TH fit i , NEW SECTION; CLARIFYING THE ' TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE PROVIDING A �CA� BECOME CHARACTERIZED , THE RIGHTS OF CEI TARN LAND OWNERS WITH REGARD TO PROPERTZES USE OP WHICH M C TERIZED AS A CONDITIONAL USE # . AFTER_.. HE DATE OE THE COMMENCEMENT OF SUCH USE; AND DECLARING � AN EFFECTIVE THE DATE: �tt r' Jtadopts „,. ; „ . Councilman Cook. Motion to ado tp Councilman Mickelson; seconded byCounci .., sed the intent of . the ordinancethe effect on g and (a) Council and staff discus exia tin developed property. I t was the concensU5 of the Council the or'dina'nce fx� WOUld apply property p y aproperty owner and successor& would have status of permitted use of the current tone thereby not necessitating application of conditional use permit; however; all requiretnen.ts of the nw one die' such as set back, etc. would be applicable. Ordinance No. 75-.42 waa adopted by unanimous vote of Council present. �q',°?r,�• „ .. ,., ..;,� wG :... - � '� s,stiieeank'.AMewi present. 10. ZONE CHANGE Amendment to toning map of Cit of Tigardreclassifying Cert aau, . l a. nd l OwuPr] # F Joseph ChamberlainArroHeatingCo, 0n 5. W. Wa 1nu t Street from -t5 to R.7single fa. it residential; iota 1)2)3)4,15016)1/ and 18 of lb.o.. t Lake Terrace Subdivision; Page 2 COUNOIL MINUTES September S, 1975 '.uetriRwunr!Y�WK:-, 4TdWa:`R rr1,.yA.r �Y I6 �d!'n ,�r•ur "?irwr�*F ..�• N ,ry„;;"'A.1.;$.`''''', - r „l." n -" ;• trqrr:,+: 4, ," r?r7n; 't ''k r� 3d 14 y r}, c;. ,� r ftk rL qtr', -. .- .... ,.. 4ft,- .t,''' '" ' ( ,. .. ';',''',' ,I '', (a) City Administrator recommended the easements be accepted by the City. 1r 4 ,,I. u yr;t (b) Motion to accept: Councilman Cook; seconded by Councilman Barkhttrste ' r,,, :::::',,� Approved by unanimous vote...of Council present. ' 1 ,, ,,:,,,,, ,,,ft, .Yr,{ 8. RESOLUTION No. 75-47 - A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL 'REAPPOINTING A MEMBER OF wfi hs, ���a THE PARK BOARD. ,� �¢ (a) Selection Committee recommended the reappointment of Terry McKee. ''i.. ,,r;r (b) Motion by Councilman Cook to adResolution 4nd by r TervY McKee ''''I'''' for a term ooffice expiring June ttotionsecandedb CouncllmanMiccelon. t�' r �k '�,t, A roved o unanimous vote of Council present. • , ,pi PP' y k, Rr (Zoning),9. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT An amendment to Tigard W 4 ''f clarifying rights.. o certain land owners with regard roperties, U 18 "which has ,,; ciar�. y � � P F Use of r.;, ''''" become characterized as a conditional use after the date of the commcncefent 9f such ,; use ` .1.4 . . (a) Public Hearing Opened 8:00 . M. a. (t Statement of facts synopsized by City Planner. z i "` Public, Testimony ;it' rt, Testimony in Favor Ito ` Attorney Fred Anderson representing Great Western Chemical Corp: and himself, {'• 4i ,, Testimony Opposed - none ' ' il,,J Cross Exatntination ., none onei�`t ,, Fy 4M u; Public Hearing Closed ittid ,,, �,'1` (b) ORDINANCE NOi 75-42 w AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18472„ (CONDITIONAL USES) Off` THE 1, ° TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE, PROVIDING A NEW SECTION, CLARIFYING THE i'; r, RIGHTS OF CERTAIN LAND OWNERS WITH REGARD TO PROPERTIES 0 THE }! ,_ USE OF WHICH_ HAS BECOME CHARACTERIZED AS A CONDITIONAL USE a ', AFTER THE DATE OV THE CO1�IMENCEMENT Or SUCH `USE; AND DECIAR: NG ,,,, i,,;:,, AN Ei{FECTIVE DATE. o by y j„�/� h Motion to adopt• Gaixt�ciin�atlss��ktiheo�ntetitoofethe ordinance and effect on ��� ,r, , (a) Council and "staff disc Y' l : existing developed property, I t 'liras the concenst1,. the ordinance ,} ,� of the Council)i� �; of��� property �y theo%ner and successors wo'ttld. l WY�` Mottl,d apply to each property and that � 4'4: ``' have status of Permitted tee of the current zone thereby not ne rel itat in }r , r application of conditional use permit however all requiremetts o; the new zone, k` 7 pp ;,i,, such da set back, etc, would be applicabiei r'�h! Ordinance No4 75 42 Was adopted by Unax`t .mou8 vote P &yt of Cc��ttt,c.l.l, re�e��t� t Oyu N,; ;I+r 1,O ZONE CHANCE - Amendment to zoning map of City of Tigax. ', `reclassifying certain lands o'wuod `'{ of i J�I ..�� � ,. � � „n ,,., byPose h Chamberlain and Arro�. HeatingWal..u t Street from R-i"� r r,, Co(�o� o S: Wr w '. ;'' k tR-7, i,ngie family reeidentiat; lots, l o 2,3,4 "l5)1F ,17 and 1$ of the, Lake Terrace Subdivision:1 ,, Ir p,f ',x 1F +, tYv� 1 ,+ P ,r Page 2 �- COUNCIL M ,NUTES ” September 8 1,0` 5 w . .''.,, 4"A14x+!..+rfY 'o,',,,447.114'1'1.1,. k,!..,m.M t.o6�f�.+A..,t4'01'4',4,*''. . ,14.1 -.-`YS.i.,,r.'r.,1ql,9 r!.4.: 7'11 ,x+1.....s# '',‘!1'17,',7- arxf,1,,.�.r,....M Y M ... r�t r y�Y7 S •..7vr ,,l .f 1'l r!.17.".:':','.4,..•,.� rt .,'',1,..;,,,11,.,,,;.-.', ., ,...44+ �93. �r. ..F,6i„!JR. . Yr3 rSp dr�t�4+ a�l V, 11 ,i1 1 yy tl).t i♦,y • • , 40 t#` (a) Public Hearing Opee61,, ,.., Statement, o,f facts s'r;:1 m,:nT (ec, h P° ,,u+ ,fir Planner ., Public Testimony t�P, a , Testimony z.n favor 41 4y Joe Chamberlain, propetty cet, 12350 S. W. 124t;h L�, ire Testimony opposed CrossExamination,- none It Public Heating Closed (b) ORDINANCE No. 75-41 - AN OR.DINANCEbF AQOPTING FINDINGS WITH 'RESPECT TO A PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED CHANGE IN ZONE CLASSIFICATION FROM R-15 )> RESIDENTIAL TO 'RESIDENTIAL ON LOTS 1,2,3,4,15,16,17 and 'Rr It` 18 'O OF T1-E LAKE TERRACE SUBDIVISION GRANTING ZONING CHANGE AND TM} DECLARING AN EMERGENCY n ), Motion to adopts Cc tt:i tman M •ke+kcr"`a seconded by Council Barkhurs :. Council considered test:,mny atd facts as present,, .r r42 ? w; trI Ordinance No 75 pias arG�d by .;: G�"« t5 vote o Council present. RESOLUTION No h 75 41$ A RESOLUTION OP' TRS CITY OF"TIGARD, OREGON RELATING TO T 11. HE P , �...�..� ADOPTIONOF TRANSIENT ROOM, TAX AND DECLARING AGREEMENT WITH t! `4M 1,0 CERTAIN' PROVISIONS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ORDINANCE Na 1 110 AS AMEND D$, ORDER THAT AN AGREEMENT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY MAY BE EN'1',EBEb INTO FOR THE PURPOSE OF SHARING REVENUES �{ `T• DERIVED PROM, THE WASHINGTON COUNTY TRANSIENT ROOM TAX: 14 R61 (a) City AAdministtator reported t ,i ..wa ,�., a �IJ i��-ew `ax but rathet would alloys the City , a ✓k.Y 1{, haa,S ) to share in xevena.es derived fret. wry Waa,sington• County Transient Room Tax. City's share would be one.half oh tJ* e; ;i, t. .. g tax, r (h) Motion to adopts Cout ilwsn Cooks seG,vond.ed by Councilman Mickelson Apptoved by unanimous vote of C`; '.;a t. r pe:sentt ?°4 . 12_. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT Tre1ating to T'y ;.r,siet. Tax a d Authorize. Exsout ;on , r ,6 (a) City Adnitis tratot rocorm nded n _bcw` zq Mayor and City Recovder to execute N 7i agtsement on behalf of tho Ci 4t r Y� (b) Motion to authorize aa.,:-,u t ,l , Cc e,° M,i .lira•i Co,r:k,' seconded by Countilrnan. Mickelson,4' Approved by Utaarilmous vete 0.0 ro„r ,t.1. y t;s r , e ; 1:5, MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT 4 ' , ugh tt Sew(4,1t zed tc�nt , yw�I u ,Fr:' + d;t youssio; s with Vought and Ar dersoii (a) Attorney Bai,�c�y synopsized ��I �° '+� , ,• �, stated l w,e rra a ,w ra d�.��. �. reetref t ,was movely to ct.latir`y the i ztent of �. Legal Counsel J � � � �, riLi'. I 11Y• Nt1J1 Pit,•,o 3 COUNCIL MINUTES Se t'em ger 8, Y� 1 1 ! t-.,.,r i �„t 'mitt..'k't;,. wF c,'r i{+l+9f'C#Si ;.iVt, •.1 sh.,n++rRP.,, .rw7...f-Mr";*?[r"". .7?is'%'A. Jf �fi _ tY"lsq+ ,! !�^.• '� ..:.a:"` t t. A d:C �,� ) ;, +. >j7^ �F, "' -.Y!:'K"!. n ,,.,„p ., - .�"!;:-«.„ ,,, .,-.. .� ,.,__,r .� .,,� ++e:;.4�'. .,r�., y.i,i qu„+ .tt .u` t` w_.1; .r. .yr..,. 'i,+i ,• ., 3. .. .. n♦ it"'.,el t ,i,l;.: F ii f i'r' l r 1?`"a fy�j ',ii,,/./., " { :?+a dkla l the contract and co'nfifm the balance doe. Attorney° Baiey„ e . c, , , C .ci. . ,.,, , -thcrize f., i the Mayor and Recorder to`execute the agreement on '°.feha1f of tale ',.',tri', iw ay (b) Motion to authorize executions Councilman Barkhurs t9 seconded byCo anci lma'•o, Cook, ;, 1k. ii ' :) Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 'ti! 4! "° l4�. AUTHORIZE REFUND Sewer Connection Fee Ace Electric . 1,4795 S. W. 72nd City Recorder' reported an error in com utin the sewer connection fee for Ace :few (a YP P ga.,' y E1theycharged double the connection fee or ,„; ,4,,, +-Electric, 14795 S. P ..72nd, ...... n !"411= �.ly I aectr�c 5- W in that e were 5sewer connection; ` 890 OCl �1 r $6,300, The fees charged should have been $3,1 0 w_ $ �,, 4? representing 60% of connection fee to Fought and Anderson sewer, contract and $155.12 {"',: , ,, @ $4.25 per foot for 36.5 feet for Predelivery sewer contract . City Recorder '`; i i�l, .,f� PP w refund; that appropriate credit be given by U.S.A. �i�� that the sewed approve the andrecommendedGsewer contract holders be properly reimbursed. k+ , 11 ,, kir: 11��: (b) Motion to approve: Councilman Cook, se�.onded by Councilman, Mickelson. 'x fi;: ;. Approved by unanimous vote of Council presenia ^;� ,,4 kR J„ti: 15'v OTHER BUSINESS +,,„ 0.4 b chi^ t1 Y Administrator reminded Council of the followingmeetinngss P,U,C Twality hearin High.(a) S.HW iunziker LID to be held at 9;30 A. M. , September g g g s' 9 1975 att' 1»iI a +r;/ Joint City-County meeting with respect to Planning 7x30 A M September' 10, 1975 at '1 � green aad I:nn f4q'rI i1I� (b) SCOTTSUBDIVISION COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT. ,;�:'ti 1 ., t' Staff reported Mr. Scott has posted a Cash Bond Escrow Agreement in the amount of k}:r. ;,;li; $ 4,4l8. The developer `has completed a portion of the development and has requested }i. �` the bond be reduo�:d and the City release $12,'732 from the bond. City Administrator `ly, Iv.firecommended the Council authorize the reduction of the bond on the basis that the ;f"`i h ry ' work has been inspected and certified by 'the City`a 'ti, t°,. (1) by Councilman Cook to authorize City Administrator� ltorrrelease 4412,732 2,732ded ; Motion 1,r` from the Cash Bond Escrow Agreement for the Scott PLa.. e by Councilman{Mlckeisoti. 4 „I. App roved by unanimous vote o f Counc i i prey en t�a =,o A I'`''I (c) GARBAGE i+RANCHISE RENEWAL ;y' g ating with theµ garbage ru ,;,,,r :t':m ) �.' �`.lo,-,,,, c x; , r, �; City Administrator reported he was ne oti� „ , point of clarification with respect to writing intoag 1t ,,;a. r w.} changing garbage hauler when substantiated successive comp t a.iw t„tk r ,r r s , ¢ , .,, z �` V ',t,” disgruntled customer, Council concurred with ,suggestion a" d Citw A.d. yl ,0 ,,,, , 1 ,44. ' report progress of negotiations with garbage haull rs at study . res ,101 d 7":it, r' ' , �y, tip+ 4 )''',1 (d) Mayor Bishop reported he had contact with both %a;1.1.tcadr; rPgar"ditV to-1 ra ¢); of the ri ghts;of way Mayor to meet with compact. repres„,, � at. v4'!; s.:”.trl ., or i rf9„ , c,' ',. Cou'nr i,i et later dated- „+y: tlj'i :' Page 4 >r COUNCIL MINUTES :: Sep temhef" $ 1975, I., ,ai: ,1 !Ir' c t. ,. n 6,... . a ',.:',',....,4i 'i ^ k f' t i.. fe:+' .'a" '-, ''',v-41,1.4'''',.,:. '17ii {r syUlydPF1x+�Pp ,",�”.my *Mru t, 2'!*w', ,.^-_...�...._._.__._�.ww�....:aur <+n ckdk�s'.{,+v�Yr�a;w n9trS' :"�',fi w''P .... s.."!{'� .'�'d'"a:.,k rna.M Fw•1t7,�' !'�klm,,,ksr?°7N'��...����r,�:w 4 1cr;n sjwhcgµ!��..-. i ��,o n '''� <. ,f f5y 4 bi..��t ',� •+� = r 7. i' —,-i_r...... _ ..... it {"• °' y d, ii 11 �'rt. 6{o-'ii', 4.aa '1'Cy t i +4,. ,,ii v;ttY dp 4.`ihr1'4 My :41ta 1 1} v+J • :,,,,,,,,,'0.F� ' { lr6o COUNCIL WENT INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT �alO P. Nn T� DISCUSS PENDING LITIGATION. Y,) A,,, % �� M r ,dap ,a.°, (a) City Administrator distributed co of letter 'eceived re a•rrding Berman vs. W�eeler %5 1,1 �, and Killion, ',yy, { '.'i, ... � discussedo'C�C e'�C1S Lt S r�u, '''i -i1 staff and Attorneytired Anderson case and it was t'he r •� n continue on the case, that tint+ of Council) £irm of Anderson Dittman and Anderson. p esent Cityand do whatever is necessary, -,, ,tti , ' . ' y'' ,!`< Y_ be instructed to re � ' Attorney Anderson as set byCouncil, the case Eavo�`abl,yn :'� ` ; n 1�•t ato settle , ,,;* within the limitations to t�.ons ii 4,'t i ;' Meeting Adjourned 10245 P. M. ;.t,F; t a jj Y +t,, ,31,�,., ......c .......2................____ City Reccrde ),, ATTEST gut r� - ,,t-r.., .P,'1 May'o'' i:';' , a j , ter r GI +f� „,.•.,' rl ht' , I+4, : iia 1 ,' ^I ri li r, i . r Aeas r r a wh p ',),Y x+M y• 1ya w 4 t ff a1,, ' tiff., y' �f a .,I' +{ar k Fq!t4t ''; ;,�a 4 ., „,�. 14• .svw „ire,,+t v M� a aP `Y .x..Fel C: 7”�F ate, w '!„r/ ,,, Mfr4.,q:1';,",),;',F .•,,,': R r"w..i.,! i ju°,!');:t *i::t t^ 't',.4 w1 waa,r.. t ,y., ..,+�a'„Inawn...ai'"�* "w. ori t�aa to a .,,,'h°�r'K'k' �,.� a.:. . ..r"�1 M"�..,. :4k`�+Sm"�'w. : r, r'. „_. ,� .7.;..t,.F n+ . a., sr,, 1 ,, .d4.1, 5;,,.- x. r,`4"'^e .tr'r' . dh°.11., ..r Mai $F ta ,t r'�r"r!r. 7a M ,'. ,/t Tl °�,v..,qt ., ;„ r 'i1"rt"^"... .M::h""'P fi .,.... � , 'h ... a"P,........ M7ur.a,r e a "Ae. , ,�� a ,:r. � . � r� �l��y'96 ., �� .,.,,�'�°! ,� �.. ,,, � � :ra, . �”" 9.'�;�i.S„ �- r. w. J .L Y 'i ''"' ` .sa?t,Y v,.+ r i tt,�l �r"I :0'.k'>, ,., r t o x n ,.. , .,. r, �,.,. .. yaq ;r :{, „° a r R",•�, °`. N. ,..+ n i�.re•.s"q. �7fuw�wear�w�wrawwj.wma*ww....w.+n+ -+c—�--- t xr jY j3y r+0.t�:: V , 4 i;'YlY yYdi,+ .-, _..,.4 w .. , '',..,‘44.i'�4 nt^ ztf or a,, mow. ,41 2 41-- Yr 96 ,l,\:, r, to� � tA.;� 1\9 ,.:.,..i.1,,,,),e 7.� x"l 5 . . Yl : w ,,,,,,:,64,,,.,,,6;,,..,„,,6„,„,,,,.„,„,:,,,,,„,,„.„.,.....,lw+ . , u Y"," . =wrd ,,,ay... w:.s>.,.._an406.44,4.4,aw.4x.5.4.44,,O......44.40,4.-41:4.,•14:-.4,a.+YnN;,:=r,-. +.. w.V.,..,4 ,41wa+:.Fwtw .alaau,,,,,...,44it:0.44..3+w.wcw.M.aw.t,"5ib ,wI. MY '11 r i 1, AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICYATI N ,.,.., 1l . ��,. ,. GAIT 'C>F.TIC"iAT�'D Y. �� ah ra , . ,,,.„,,,,, t , y sliAlat Or OREGON ' SEP , + A•Y+r,•,iiontlY t''''v5 51 ' r wASHINGTON, ss: 9 1975 ��,,NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, ,,,,..,/,. ; COUNTY 0 ,f, Notice is hereby given thate'atirik'wilt be held .a,Public ,,,;;,,,; Ya _ CITY OF l uAD ,cii at New r Fowler• Jr , t h "Lectiiire., , Y,�kn',. e{`!; I, ....._.. .._......: ..64,4....JTO .epi...:Sihaf.e �.,w,. .. Roomi 14865 S W \Vain t Stre•et, 1'i��' ,,,, A ;gard,lOregon on.Septem'b !1 G{ ,,v j -0dl P. res 8�^;19,75 at x' �, ky /t p far being fust duly sworn,:.depose and say: that I am the publisher ._....,......_._,. i�R ON N wt 'respect to h fol�ov�itlg..:, l''f' ti y,t 1 ,t,7� G„,,, DI, ANCE;,AMENLl-;' ,i }l,t Yt 4 c ,.., . . i ... � l'. T ""• A . t'`y1 ?g „'t ,rFY er ',r' of Thr 'Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation,.. asdefined. ,pard Municipal l'COcle Cl a ter�18Q(Zon�' ,t', } :,:..,�.,,:. �...� in clarifying r4 f� t of eeritain lanr1a, F>' ,t, g P pY ! 'r1; "``�” by ORS 19�O1U .and 1�J3.Q20, published at °Tigard, in the aforesaid count and t��, �' �ow�n�rs With g, a d a" rb ert des,`tS'se'',�� ;�°K�;;�' ! a ,,, of whirh has become char cterized as t;,,,�,,u' ,, , , , to.nof the',, wY� r ' , state' that py ' corn mencement of such ue date ,''' 'I, �� ` the legal notice a printed co of which is here o annexe wase a con itaonal use after h , ''4 published in tfie entire issue of said newspaper for -aa._..,..:.4x..2w._a.:.. successive anal `i .LONE CHANG .,&,.„...,mendment to 41 ;. 'z n&g map of City of Tigard,rec ps, , ed conse .: lass+ ^,�,i. �>`+ in .certain lands owned_by Joseph` "t�F;�a ,! . cutiVe weeks in the following issues ,..•.. ......a:a:.:..,...a.a...,_...:.a..�.: ,�....: i Chamberlain and.Arrow,Heating'too; ,+� r� .. ,._ `.. on S VU Walnut Street from..—.2.8_,...„&„„.., lots p ;4,,,,),9....,,,,,:., �1;2,3,4,15,16,17 and 18,6f Cape Terrace/ ;1#s!+‘ta pf'9 „ .. ,.. �e s v� +may it t7' , ..ra........ !tet' Lt SubdivlS1an.L' lel„S,a!4"r�"`G"r,� ,_?).., y:yfi''�R r YYd ,ra �• .. .,.»... ,vM { +ni T�'Yr Yi .�`,c'l"., I i,.p!rj .�igriat e �� 'A11 interested`persons"tray appea,, ;u,� vt,4,;� . and be heard iti favor of or against the' `'"'t:1p {y-rti�, t ,aF :,v,-.+T-e.,,,',".4 ��F1u� ,, : 1 1a+., M d'Y wY `• e.-,.. .i,,,44,,.Y ,m'y c•w. t,, u?.i!+r r i``41 $+bb. �"said prapos - ,q, :V1 , ' Y Y"r a " *t ,b I.ia{1?+y";i � Subscribed and worn to bef +` 1. ,„ .n,, 1,,.� 11��, r t i are rnr thx day of $Y OItiDC COi1y� r, ,i{, ...aw.....»n«w .a�....a...: ..» a., :w: N s r�y w ' ,t r+.,a k OP CIT' "` ,"a `�t+� 4. , p,k i i, ; x,i Yi":y „Doris Har'tig,Y., '''!"4.`'.':''.''4:4"tr ►�'e ` A ' f i y.v ,,.' a 4ra.�' ' ';¢. +'N`l'e 4 i!4 ,t'J ; s p 4119....411 ,.,. a,„> 4, ,�y,,, ,ii14 ':; City> Recor�d�a�r'. ..i'vp ,i4 ! 4:4.44.4.:,444.4.n.i.a444a.44.y.�.fa.La..nu.:4. .y (k rI (Ti'.,2471 :. Publish AugAi" , Y' ,''''s' 4 i' /ry ; ' 1975)• MY tR '.'.>�"�! r'"L�'?i, Y ;,» �t fjti'.a rj k',cr.�eY ty; 1 %�/j / J� Y , Y' 3'�' lI ey. 5. ��Yi,,{� aYry.{1' a".I 4... ♦u..ax ._....� .:.4:«4«t .....4J .«......a .uu.a,a./,.4c b ° t i. ! r `d' P' /"SfA .a'T, 'w a+:a_ . ''', vr”tlt 'Ot .fid yy���rtrt`+''i!1 ISL.a,.. w .4.a•.} � ,QyY Y :, kk Nota y Public Uf Q) gUn `+:° R ,., `iP Ip �rNCylts . .. % + y '� ; ;�;,,,,''t''' MeCOCAnllsb4ion expires a.« .Ya...a.....4. :7S: ,.,a . aa.y. * :i,..,,,,„...,,,', + t.Y � u ::,,,,,,,,",„,,,:,!.:0,,,, ,,,i,,, �i,t t g ;it, 4 �2r3�}' � y• ��, , a ...w, . . a. .x+.a ,.-,» a a. M+wawaw ..-,..a� .. - ,..�.,a. n � . ...sw¢aRiw+..w.+li^;Ch7"'7(4V^�Y "t.pwp tr. 4" F, b,,..,*,,,,',7",T.: y+.,'yr Y�k fit 1Vf . , �,r�.t yv a f 'kik'It rr Ott,. ttr=)1 , w i5. ,,{ qqSt tY;,,,; Y 1,:..1h,-,1,..' t,',,I 1 'yF,,ittt f H a'.4 i I tt-P�"O/y i7. iFrF� Y ,Aa,,r, '0:10;Y , • .L 3t hry 'C @IYy,}R .r,uAtu,` ?r�'w"y 1 S�I,Y lt i�y ir, ,..., ,., 1,,,. „e,.:ix ..,,:,:,:., , • r'.,.. n ,,„u,.,., .,:. , ,,i.:... ;,,, .V ,1_ pt•,:.,,,q'40,,,,,,.�`' .. .,o „+n. ,a. .a. i,.Y ,ar_ . „I. ,., t W�LP� y t. :Nd.H.M1.R'Jl,3 r,,,.:,...11',,,,,,',.. rpu .,, ... _.�., .. •,.:'.-', ., +� ” ti yT . r r ,;."A"+P !?t, ^}Y'� Y! ,'CiY� , ,� Y �,. .,..ran,.. , , ,. ,. .,� v ,.,,i.. ,� ,., . :.. .�,, rfi, :.�"f."..�,. ., . � ,.'N ,+ +;,,,,;),:„4,,,,r Yr.:,., !t hP. r,-�:,4,:,,,:,,,..',„P.:. � « �. ra y :�a. .., w l.:.w. .,..:Vwa r, d, . .., il. . .:. . .r..1,k, i-di,T,. �FY:a; a9 t t.r, ..I t.. I.. ....,�, �;.! '.,H ,.r ,�4, fv,ir. y, 1... +�.".n4a ,N„,,.V .,.,.. ., .s r'r .,,.. 1.x,...,:„ .M.?.;.kr IV ; .,„�..�r..i7, ,, q+ xt r... .'.. t,. K,•,,,,.3vM^+ ..,M a fir}s�,-. ..Y- ,.! ..;��., r,A, �ft'''', j,�j N.Y„,r _ w , ..",I_. �.:a, H ..•. .,, tr r.::� r•. ..�., t �...I µ ... .. .,.:n.�. � ... . YR1�ryiKl�.11�1/�iwY.rilfrtiN�YRriW1iY `� ti sr ivy �f i, kK VVI } Kwr I ;,,�'• cif'! St7 ht' Ji` rti', 1r .!, * Y, ,1,.'i , , ' ' '(';‘,-.,'i, ki; rtr It i•• NNS 1y„ tt Ety',,,„ 4N 1lr,;` its is rl{f` !i Y >-;1'1' Septeut aer 4s 197, '" 1tR,'. ,,,- ,i,,,,;. �K ,"►4 `rod , e,sokt of 1 0 )3o 2 OO 4 '. rr a .,''..f,..;..,• r Z' i �' "G 1 fly,- 4, yaa� '.i4' tear ?red ,`,, u1 A, Tho ildmobt to the Tigard , r , clarifying x �o o {yt a. 6 c� which h�61:1600m0��� cheraoteriied a4 A 004- 4k , of the oo n enoement of s Oh use - will be considered by embe ' 'A'' ��4, �3 �» $��� s�.a �'� ��t�W � � ��$,, G JAI. �',��.. . .. kr'� p , Fowl6r High Soh oo1, it the lecture r, �p ,dry�y�J^1f,Ly, I `y e)j. Siz oe�M a1 Y '!;i t,,f' yr' Planting, ireotox D]i pt` 1.'. �f ;• l 3 $ • t,.. $, • • - I i,1: ,i • ! 1 ' aEl,t' r1t y;. /,1#� r'''''•''i• 1 -.�. .,.,., ,,,r„r; r,,, ,c ,.,,. '''''''''''‘''';',.'''''''i',' <, r lia^ ,,...,,h,,,,i,, .i,,„..11'6V, f'YtYnENN... :ailin:,,'u,„, GR 1 � rm: n 1�iyrh ''';',,'''','''''';''',',',:.;,;;;;••'',',•,' �x�w,Aglrrn w ,".,..';,,,,4.,,,,,',,,;"''',;;,,,,v,,,, 1� rCe 2d �fi x.'r„t �` y r'��� m a'Iv',,•,,,,-'....,'''',4,,,, r u a•e`�-c ,i�vn, — x. +�.a�s'P� 17', "".:i1C 5r V �'C1, `i -.. la,``u '�i .:I d 7 � •..•.-,1 7 7 'fid 'l,; t, t'a'"i' ,4 I r+l 1� 41 ,t 1 II'7'ri PM' :II k ,wt d.rN u ,i,Xr ,, r,,t+d4=7¢d'f µea+M 4,4.,Ii,t '.'s t ;t `} i Cr}(, :,"`. N.�4l. 17 Y '� ' S -. , CI °I, TIGA D I rKt • •, Ir ,i';'-if NOTICE OD, ULCH1ARI " ,,W ar, thatl '�` NoLi e i$ hereby glven � ���� � ��tr�.t1� ��:�� �� h�1d by �.'�� r f tN ,r ,'!;k City co011e .I. t `flw .ar 'r. High Lecture Rote, 1'0865 S. W. .'', 4 ' �kyA• Ci +a . a g, rd . Or t' t+ tt o etnbot 8, 19150' at 8;O() ?* '1. r .t'h xtt#t 5� 4 •''',''',';',:,%.,4'.1,'..•,'',, res pn 110 t. to t�0.J,L.�iiolWW�Y•1����g�'„kL�.l"tYYY#Kix.i• .d p...1?'*:.:. •,.-• ll! ffFff P .lA.;Y,1ui,gµy, '''':,''''';,,,t 7O INO 'ORDINANCE AMENDMENT io A . 4m0ridr€nt to ipard Mun10LP4 . °;i 1,',4)1'.'tCode Cha• pfor t (Zoning), o�.ar fying rights o cor m laud' ,,(: �� F, , o or with re Marc to properties, use o which hats become '"' ' " ''''04.• t araotari ed as A 0OAdit.ota1 use after the data of the ,:, '''''.''-''',4 1q t4p uoe use, 7 'tw� .. , y y7kiai ,''' '0. 01441 CHANCE ' AtAtildmeut to •zozun tip oCity of Tigard } �1 ��f r + las lfyiu cojtai Kaes o t • by Joseph ha ' e�cl•ain an r ° Arr6� ea iOS Co. 00 ►S. W. Waittut S tre t rom L+�15, to 010 ' •'i ':'';�'�; 'sln , . Ean44y res'#�rl'snti ,4 tots, ,2$ 4, 5ii6, 17 .and .8 of '1 '', , Lot Terr . 0Sub via o00 ' ,,y,4.,.,,,,',..;',.'','.., ra persons ra appear a d be hoard, favor o or a ain t , ° , .ithe, M�.. b • • ' , `N , Y ORDER Or TtE CITY COUNCIL •' jj � er yy Xd 4 ('Ix' s' t 4''',:,!,:';'!i4.,..,. City 1 aaorda• (i''''''''''',''':',..i • ' IT p'ublith, ,13/ '28,'. 9/4/15 ' . ' , ' ' I w�t1aJ't.I,,d�' i, 11't t f�§ Kr d , ; x�� k t Iw, atY4ir'll'''.'''''';';:.,'''''',' ' , . , , ' ' , , ,.'1',1,',1.',, drLpY 6st," f v r+`ti i t� !• '.''''''1,'''' ,p ,, Y c ,,1 't''4',,'','.,'',,,.'''.'.1..i 1 eM1f , CCC i r� ��+kk�t��jf ! y f Wr ♦ ',-,. • Y. fl.,. n,•"{i. •�'*nY ',..,.'...t'{w.Y."`�'�1t'^Rr M C .. �.n �� %d v' �Nr)Kl`ifV�!°17L't ,�:,iA 1 .,. 1�. t. '1 Ar S4y�.F ,l� .rM I' K.fr. N el ry 4w:1 ,e , r ,w,� "N 5'�} f � :, •t7 YN.,;>R ' 7 , t'p >� `F �'F^f vh!?„ ..0 n. N>" ., 7 t '"'' . Y•, , >4 sY. e:,, ,,. �., .�:YFIM1r4!`f. .iTtitj7 ;5h x!.19h'4•ptr 1 tt .!AH, qi N ��`1 ,'9nSF7` "tYp,yrs.l. '�; .„. ,. f. aY"!: . ! .�y.... {} 1.tl, .. � :. � Y, ,7 y ,r''Y w� k.. .al d 1Y;f�. ,,, ..,c,-� ,„,_,�. "�, �1.. r '(.R-,C,f�. ,., .� �_,� ,n,.. ..�,1.' �, .n r n. �al'-'h. �'��:� 4�� „ .t ...k. . •. i,e. - n.i �� n .� ,=& . q+ .✓r. ��e,��: ,�i.a' .y,t 11� �kt .r e, °fi : ,est bk,r ,,k ' P r c 0 u a c 1 L , ..---7-a'A',.. ko) ,„., t, +,,,,, .ii) sop, . : sj 4 .. I` `Y +O , Wf'idl1'>�'eM ,'., REGULAR MEETING August 25, 1975y 7.30 P, M. ' t Mayor Wilbur. A. Bi:sho ; councilmen Ralph C. Barlchurst, John E. Cook, '���;, ' ROLL �ALIL+s Pxe,ser�i�p P'' P y' , B. Chief '..Police; Joe Dit I Alan, W. Mickelson, Robert C. Moq��e R , � Adt�ms • Bruce P. . ., ,,, + I', Ball.e T Legal Counsel; Dick Bol.en', Planning 1)i.rector, ® ' It'' Administrator; Doris HartLg, City E,ecorder, '•::•,',•..F. 1,}• • . , , 'y' e .. .. , 1 15� J"; ; APPROVAL OF MINUTES, August 11', 1975 a f„` *' ".� s Y , be cor .. twi'`'t ,' >tY{� �''' " ,, � ' q P g 2, ubsection (d), tine ,two r j; 1, �,« t• �:�.unc�. n Moore re ues ted a e �q i teen 1 � n „!, �;I , , '� trunks and poles limited to not. fore than ten ,inches ix diameter ,iti { �1, read tree �'� ,: , ''': ,,1ii,' fl' byapproveseconded by Councilman, ,; k! , cb •Motto xn Cauncilrnan Cook to ml.nut:es as coxrecte � s ,�'• Mickelson. , r ',:‘,...P.,w ". I r' Y L' • Approved by unanimous vote of Council.... , ,..•, , 1 , , ,{ ry,d,t , , t I =11 , t ," ' A '; , { ,, Mr,y yrxy,a, , WRITTEN COMMftN1C�TIONS r � ,d t1 . , Fos , ''tike Council discussed the following correspondences , ', • t,,.::,,,; 109th and the closing o 'war;'i� (a) g g , n,ditio a S S . ",1 Letter' f rr�m �barl.es Peck regarding the co ,` `�`'t: 'of street to public. City Administrator stated staff his contacted Supp t, Brown of `,`, i.": , p, ent Corp., Bill McMonagle,, in „:‘,.,'-p''',. ;',..• �lashingtoa� County and Engineer fqr mual.gtin T3errel:o m .' Council requested City Admi.nistractor respond ai dtb ,i �sFi �=s,�� ,`� , an attempt to solve the problem. i'''1,,‘;',';,',',:, , ' ' Y {fir explain status to the Pecks. h;, �r 1, V { P gnst;ructio } of, n overpass a• ty 'yi"a,� "' Comes' t�)aclenc a from School Dis tri:c t, 23J'ti egardix g c ,`' fib' pwas under State Highway , .. 4:4,,,,,i.,;1'...,st � , . �•'�o � F reit and 99C�10 for commented this. C�r . CityAdmin.is tra.. , I. � ,.•: y+ ...1,,;;;•:',.:1,','.,; ; +' , 'jurisd ,1"'ion, how'everi, he 4ill investigate if federal'.funds 're available that might be used for -his ► t Council ,,,,,4.,' -. • t" project.. 'requested ma•t'�ter'he re�exred to Hi.gfat�,tay, ,'X,'� I Department for response and evaluation. , ° • >! Ay r ` 'I.''''.11";'''',; , , N (c Several. staff meslbers: and':. members of City' Cpi ncil. teceiVed copy of coycrespondence , ,°`F, �,I �regas•ding 'potential clotbeing go��portlaucl: P, �;Yy. l � , '.�„ �dl, ' X m' filed a ai. str Cit frith `resect .to. action of c t hh. y AJ ''" ` " intern who made citizens arrest in City r AUDIENC ', ., s y .1: i{1.° • {"'' a s �','....,1 1 /y; ,y', e) No response. 1, ',,' v'.•`Mo1JirH'.LY I.EPORT5 l',": "Public tics ,' ,4 Administration and Works ' , 1 , Building �,y 1 y int � y ' ° t, ,S'���! 1F" , • ' Finance h ,. • Library • s Planning ,• r .. « Police ti4' ryt , Xx,,, y nfh . re .or t Councilman 1 .cN Y; n� M�otfon to accept mo y p e].son seconded byColing loran �,cao1�. ,, } .... ,i` Appr�ted �y �iaximO�� vote of Colinrit. _ . 5 r r a 4 r ,._::.., . . .„..- .,...,,, . , . 4'3'0,,. 4 ',.. ” . .•..,.,.., . . li ( 4 , "4.4..' ,,, � .16�"'Y wwry�>a,y :<., „+dr<'. a. ,:,1',;%,' '+';+�,. f«tx," ,, to"i�' !, ,tr?.,.trsf „Iy,,” Iw:rtl. :;#,+'0X�Y , Ilk" VIII, y..a rtnM:,19 .. fPy ,�etlSwrrnal �.y�°,'tel�fM»�xw tw*u1ti.^ ,timE *.M �°"�1Hyn�r¢d4� ' + 4 + .. +o,� l. wX4Jq,„ , `r'.. rr�r „;,fir tY fr• r 4 air, ;i •t l ta�f i 6. APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES .,L9,6.56.24 1",,;. (a) Motion to a prove a Councilman Moore; seconded byCouncilman PP�r 9 Barkhurst. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 7° RESOLUTION 'No. 75 43 A RESOLUTION EXPRESSING APPRECIATION OF THE CITY OF TIGARD TO f7F4' ROBERT BALL FOR HIS PUBLIC SERVICE AS A MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. (a) Motion to adopts Connc i lmazi Bazkhurst9 seconded by Councilman Mickelson.' City Planner suggested resolution be amended to recognize Mr. Bell's efforts"in formation of the Site Design and. Review Board. ,` (b) Motion by y Councilman Moore to delayaction until. end of agenda, to give City Planner ; rs�} time to rewrite resolution; seconded by Councilman Cook. • Approved by unanimous vote of Council. �6,r qty, ,• Cc) City Planner `suggested the 'Addition of paragraph three of the resolution to read "WHEREAS the Cityy Coun�:il wishes to express its special appreciation iaton for the 4•, r � .P � P PF � � assistance provided in £o +,'ning Tigard's Site Development and Architectural Pei.ga Review Board by Robert Bali,°fib :r (d) Motion byCouncilman tarkhurst to adopt resolution as amended:p nded, seconded by Councilman Mickelsona Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 8, RESOLUTION NO. 75-44i„ A RESOLUTION OF' THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING AN APPOINTMENT To THE PLANNING COMMISSION. �, . (a) Mayor Bishop stated the Selection Committee recoMMended the appointment of Raymond (taexpire 7/1/78. Councij1.. dscusse4 select Ems fora term of o��ice to exition prgcesP and rr,i i,,ry'. other citizens interested in serving on Commission. P a ,,7 {b) Motion to ada tm Councilman Moore. secs"onded by Cour'ieitman Cook rA' Approved by una titnous vote of Council. THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING 9. �iESQLUT10N 7545 _ A RESOLUTION OF AN APPOINTMENT POR AN ALTERNATE MEMBER TO SERVE ON THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW,BOARD. �F k ,( (a) Selection, Cot rrtitteerecommended Daniel, Smel$er replace Tom Whittaker fora tom u expire /1/76 ('o) Motionto adopts Councilnan Cooks se.condee d by Counoilman Micre lson4 b Approved by unanimous vote of Council: 4ris u, 104 RESOLUTION No. 7.5;46 .,+ A RESOLUTr p•N OF THE TIGARD CITY' COUNCIL APPOINTING MEMEEE.S TO THE TTCARD CITIZENS AND POLICE COUNCIL (T-»CA ) tl f Plage 2 - COUNdIL MINUTES Ausus t 25,0 197$ �•.j 0 ., *nrw.wr 'k"?R"- "�;Y.1+kY+TIY,.mrnK1S 1,K$Met,,mv'"tm;'"",'.'r���1riHNYilileDh�liUN"r.M. 'v'"y°^45,}rd'Yt 5`'P�Itrd,N*hh'fi Y•A,tz' '� r .W 'rsCYad 'ri""['i'?+h' eY:}`.d:s k .:,ki'.i, !; „ ^i 7., .YL r •u rr ,, i', te , Iy ;jyni .;1 :11,ii:„.''''' , 1, ,,‘.,',,,A,:il.,,..,'",',.4.,' `�!y xr rl' .. '' (a) Seec�tnomm � �, eodedthe Eollowing appointr, is4 SisterBonaM���e, rl ,!t!:' '�tJack Ryan and Laura Quimbyu i, ,,, t ` Understanding all terms of office would e(pire ',tip Lb) atuthe lend Cook Resolution swas samended by common consent of Council. Making the 5,,1 .,; following appointments P4�, s' �,�s ¢,+ Sister Leona Marie - term' expiring 7/1/77 4�,.t ,, Jack Ryan " of 7/1/79 H Y a to if I(` 'gar,. Laura Quimby 7/.4/i8 �'r i�l�' \,:1',,''' r�F l r ,r +i1 >.`a '' (c) Motion by CouncilCook to approve as arnendeds second�;d by Councilman Mickelson, * ',i= .« ''.11,y Approved by uhhanimous vote of Council. Yr � Zvi , a'4k,�' ��.. ORDINANCE leo, 75�wli'o � THE CHAPTER �,8.�4, , �'I�,a i y AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODS STANDARDS, AT ,~phi 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS, WITH RESPECT TO VISION CLEARANCE „,�, rY''''' INTERSECTING STREETS AND CENTERLINE SETBACKS FOR DESIGNATED ;'�� A 1t1�y 1 ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR STREETS, PRESCRIBING AN EFFECTIVE PATE AND r,x$ at ,r. DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. x : rpt r ” , (a) Motion by Councilman Barkhurst to remove from table Ordnance 75,140; seconded by ' ' `� , "tr Councilman Cooky ,,t? ' `. Motion failed by 3i-2 vote of Council; Councilman Conk and Barkhurst voting AYE; 'Y;1 " '. Councilman Moore, Mickelson and Mayor Bishop voting NAY, ,, � Yr� \f �,�°'; F,, requestedthe records show he vote \, Counciltttthe table 5 an Mcke]:son �a,econsidered his vote and EN1'£` Ay'E thereby takingthe ordinance off h . ; ; sxr+, (b) Motion by Councilman Mickelson to reconsider and remove ordinance 75-40 :trot the ,q}r { ' table; seconded byCouncilman Bar�itrstb a^. ,r :.-,..:4, +:� ii: ' Motion passed by majority vote; Councilman Moore and Mayor Bishop voting NA [�' r� {e} CityAdmnistatoxrecommended removing from Section 4.b reference to size o trees and vision clearance for.,_private driveway$" Council and staff discussed the pro- A rrposed a en meht wih respect to private and comnetcial drivewa s as well a$ Set- t tlr backs orspecified streets. ,7 ; i 4 I `ipiY ��xt'wy by .. k' p R by y It j (d) Motion Coun,c�.�man Ba,r :hur'st to adopt, with deletions a$ recommended city oltr' ,:�,, Administrator; seconded by Councilman Moore" ,a� r t,.(,, ''" Approved. by unanimous vote ofCOuncii, k ,ft, ( ) � ... ' 1 Motion b Co�nc� � �sn Cook the staff �e instructed throug the Planting Commission ai ', °I" to pursue arnenrmenes of frontyard height clearance; motionseconded by Councilman ,4a I't, Barkhurs t� ��� 4c +t tri rY Approved' by unanimous vote of Council d '"' t� *r+t j r t� SON NG OR IiNANCE AM1 N An. amendment to Zoning Ordinance of 19/0 �1,. ' r �'� clarifying rights of certain land owners tdth regal',e to properties, Use of which has �',, ,arif i ,,, fF4 become charaste'rized as a conditional use after the date o, the commencement or such use, ak M . }, 't vl ,tib;, T 4. !' P4g0. 3 6COUNCIL M rNUT8$1 August 25 0 i 9'7 5 , «F,t: , ,,:. .,tl+•lI NI,ri,kl-:)µW.n.,.,\v n.Y•:,Yn ,w,ry.,. 'b ' M1 , y Mar's,~T:,',P', ' ,.- .! 7.. ..t,:.r 1 `La:W k'trfo., tis'r, «yaw 1,.., P 1,^i r^ ...,;."^, 4a 1 a �' .t1 x, ., tiN t,:G Idca/N tin T,� YfNCga'rtrctM1 Nh`t "!'7 �.% ...'1. +'('Pi".... :R .:.,,�".+,.'4;A"G+' ._.!'� , , .,.C .'- `t .::'�.Y ..t: 7l't n• ry, r, '''',.,i 'el'',. 1; .,,- ;. +tt� '�'ra„+bh�!..gX.r t'hfi7'. „a, da`�rQ1 i.�9, :.:,,�"k -,,.. ,,�" "�`Y�*�T.�`�`,1 �:�',1,*`,!Cy' .°�","�' l". ,rr i. a. W r 1.„ e,w^ I + ,4;.d -, i. ?f' I Yi 11 w.iy ,a) Setting of Public Hei Bezg September $y 1975, 8x00 P Int r �� by''‘'b)'b) Motion to setpub�.3,c :hearings CouncilmanMz.cicel.son! seconded Councilman Cook. 4r: 40, Approved by unanimous vote of Council. >r; mapof Cityof Tz a d, initiated 'yr ,-' 13, the �,on�.�g •g � by the Tigard {It', reclassifying Certain lands ,owned by Joseph Chamberlain and Arrow Planning Commission, single family residential; lots, Heating �' .� � g Q .` {«� 1284 15 16, 17 and W18nof Lake eTerrace RSubdivision, ! ! 9 9 9 ! (a). Setting of Public Hearing September 8, 1975, 8000 P. M. ;11'd (b) Motion to set 'public h.earLagn Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Mickelson. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 14 ACCEPTANCE STORM SEWER EASEMENT AND AUTHORIZE EXECUTION - Knoll Drive and Hall Blvd. t,E' S. W Joseph R. & Beverley C. Summers. recommend,s tra to City(a) Administratoryr city 1a' d Council accept: easement and authorize Ma or and .,.h Recorder to ececute on behalfy �,i. o f the Cit (11 Motion b Councilman to accE �: ) Y Moore �p t and authorize execution; seconded by Goun�:��man {tri ,tlt raa coo , fr - Approved by unanimous vote of Council. ' r'3 1,5R AUTHORIZE DISCUSSION - RAILROAD BEAUTIFICATION PROD A 4 + Ing (a) MayorBishop synopsized memo to Council and requested nested autho ization to discu$$ with dthe railroadspossible lendscaP�n anbeaut� tcxtion of railroad rigYt-of,wa , ( ) Y i ° goon record that the Cit isin interested k` I � Motion b Councx.ltnan Barkhurst Council. �` n beautification of railroad right-of-way; i Mayor Bishop Continue authorize to discussions and report status to Council; motion seconded by Councilman Mickelson, Approved by unanimous vote of Coumcil.a rf+I 1b ACCEPTANCE STREET DEDICATION ION Sri W. 8 t~h Avenue Sou th- o R mp ton '11 , (a) City Administrator requested item removed omageda0Diationla a eorrection of previously recorded documents and correction by w t. 17,1 CITHI3R BUSINESS A S. W. Gr`atb,t street p art City Administrator stated item was covered in monthly report and costs for storm been estimated. When information is prepared matter w ,l,l. be drainage have not � u . i{. brought before Council for consideration. +. Ise (13) ANNEXATION k: • y i r Mayor bishop requested status of Dr�undar . Go �t:�ssioti action as repotted orad in i WtQ �yrl, page 4 - COUNCIL MINUrl"ES August 25, 191 ..� h1r'1 I ; ,,.I.. ,,,:e..l r e{,ream; ...Va ....: .,�,,,:.. ,", , Irt ✓A rp In...rwr,".r.r»i4^1f w ".. r., cP+wti{i YMkrW,.F7,{tY+p iWW.i.tt , rttki-.: r tlV "', 'k v. w , lamc aq,Ysmlt r.�. .pR[.nr?','At '!a•:n..br."rr ,. .,Y .....wh;rz'".;:.. hp .+,°p'",K+rfn.,..,`�!, . RY,'.�,.,_. �f, 8 ".._. �+" �r�w+°ww.Y -. $S iN .r, di$ I hr�y 1Ut*:�+;.t'{,,..,t`Ya14'It��.,1�';il�`,YM1.�,',..r sr A11,4:1 4 s�f r. 14V `k�t �A'• .k, ...+J... ,—,.n.. Isla,......;.I. ✓,,.... r' n .+1-rt. ..., `� Oclt k I ' , ,' xewspapex�s Staff rk )onded Hampton Street Annexati A� as been continued to next r4 1 Boundary g i order that staff may provide further infgrma �;1,'9 , c tion for Commission's consideration. e. lit te, ��, (C ) PLANNING COMMISSION :, r‘, ht, r r=. Mayor `Bishop discussed, with Council and staff point of order with respect to ''}?'' i�u g Mayo`L questioned it` Chairman o f meeting can makend ,,' , :~k PlanningCommission meetings. , ,r: motion or second motion. Concensus of Council was' no rules have been adopted a , ,4 there is nothing to prevent such action.. ;;° A?,, (D) CITY-COUNTY MEETING ,i�. 1 City �' ' Administrator stated joint meeting with Washington County Comznissia�xers and '`�, �I 1f n c; City Council has been scheduled at the Greenwood Inn for September 10th? at 7:30 A.M. N, � Items on agenda will be areas of concernwish respect to conflict in city-county � ,� a;, j ', planning. F r. (E) R. A. GRAY DVELOPMENT '1., ' 1,,' Councilman Moore requested staff contact R A. Gray Development Corp. regarding , i,' w;; installation of stop sign from their private driveway. r,; ( ') ZONING REGULATIONS AND LIMITATIONS Y ,4 `,'t Coixncilman Barkhurst inquired if city' staff was providing information that the 'F!;'" r. yapprovalcity ~a 'i, 'business license was .for, revenue sours of �i; �Ces only and does not mean 1 laws and zoningregulations. Staff assured Councilman Barkhurst this was routine i '',3 procedure b -i, SS ';; (G) " ADJ'OURNMENT 10:30 P. Ma i' t City Recorder '•`, AL. ;' Fr,: t '' ATTEST: .! 1al �f" moi.. j .,: Mayor GLr is , , fir, , r M, u 1 i t O4, 1 11. µ11 1 k`ri 14 ;4 ra �,;; Poge 5 �. COUNCIL MINUTES August 2 , 1975 I F,t, Y.�y ^Yet ishowmantailou' .IM*r , arnp,htiintitti,tittig,yr #x,,.,ntH,_,,...,,- Ii ,,,_...,,.,,.S"h+w}'�9",. l,,M,A_�. �.N.m„,,,,4,,,,,‘,44,4, 44,1, �J4d�,.e,f'.,� , �",. ai, "� , d�+� ,.a ailY, k a•,,,,,.. ,.+ { ,,4 n•,,y A, , I4” • 1 . TIGARD PLANNING COMMISS. r AGENDA Au gtis t 19, 1975 7:30p.m. ' • Twali ty Junior High School - Lecture Room 14650 S. W. 97th Avenue, Tigard,' Oregon • 1. CALL TO ORDER x? 2. ROLL CALL • (regular meeting) ' 3. MINUTES: July 22, 1975 "(study s,esson) August 5, 1975 g `;' COMMUNICATIONS 4. JNIGATIONS 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 ZONE CHANGE ZC 9-75 (Chamberlain)` • }1 ' Ah amendment to the Zoning ma of the City of gard, xnitlaced by the Ti and Cori�niss�oni reclassifyingcertain lands owned by Joseph F! , Chamberlain and Arrow Heating Co. on SW Walnut S t. from R-15 to R-/$ Single Family Residential; lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 15, 16, 17 and 18 of the Lake Terrace Subdivision. L. 5.2 NON-CON1.+'ORMING USE NGU 1-75 (Farmdraft'Chemica1s) An amendment to the Tigard Zonin 0 ance of '1970 clarifytn the g. � ,g xd�.n ... , y' g. has become characterized g p p e use Of which With regard to ro er ties th tight of certain..land o arra conditionaluse.:after 'the date of the commencement*of such use. 5.3 ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT zOA 4-75 • (General: Provisions, regarding conditional use status) to SUBDIVISIONS: Biu ttley's Addition (south of SW Tigard S t ) A proposal liy Herb Mon sP tte.,. Bua.lders, to subda vide four eats tang lot6 south of SW Tigard St, and. teat oP SW 113th. 7. PRLIMINARY PLAN AND PROGRAM REVIEW. (Wes tra dge nark, SW 72nd and Ht nzitcer) A request for concept rev`ieW of the pret�.m�.�ary plan and. prog"ram for a. pt`oposed commercial and residentia1 pl4ntzed development at SW 72nd Ave and Huiz iker 8t, , r 8. OTHER BUSINESS 9. ADJOURNMENT . ....rte-,.,ate e wa. ....tr....M.N,. ..,kt;+w'm::Ja +•„ 4.✓. ft ��. MINUTES E. 'TIGA D PLANNING COMMISSION AUG'U'ST 19, 1975 TW'4LhTY JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1. CALL TO ORDER: Meeting was 'called to order at 8;140 P.Mo by Chairman Hartmann 2 ROLLCALL: Members present Were Hartman, Hanson Nicoll m 9 , S elser and Wakem. Staff present, Powell. 3. APPROVAL OF MIN1'TES Minutes of July 22 & August 5 approved as submitted. ' 4. COMMUNICATIONS::, ?.; Chairman Hartmanread a letter from Dr. Jack Wo Letch to the Tigard Planning Commission referring to the hearing on the Neighborhood Planning Organization` #3 Plan. (Letter attached) . ,., 5. PU$LIC H I RINGS 5.1 l done Change ZC 9 �73 (Chamberlain) of the City of Tigard, initiated e bythe Tigard Planninge rzoning map amen en to the Commission, reclassifying certain lands Comm�.,� ion oned byoseph Chamberlain and Arrow Heating Company,.- � g , onS.W. . . . Walnut Street, from R-15to R-7, Single Family Residential; Lots 19 y , 15, 1b, -17 and 18 of the, Lake Terrace Subdi�riSion. A. Staff Report Staff Report: was read by Powell Be Public Testimony e Mrd Chamberlain testified in his owx behalf. Mr Fi a neighborhood resident,entqueried Chamberlain d about .his intent to resubdiv�idea Mr.a Chamberlain indicated that resubdivision would not be neoessar'ya a Chairman Hartman asked Mr, Chamberlain about lot sizes. d Mr. Chamberlain reponded that they ran from 80000 square feet to 9500 square feet Mrs a Utz asked Mr. Chamberlain about his intentions build duplexes. to / Mr a Chamberlain responded that not now he did y build du. a. n ber�d `bo pl'exes on the lots buthad deoided to build ging1e family homes Instead. de Sta±f Recommendation '• staff reOomillended approval. ba dome ission Discussion and Action a Motdn for approval (.Hansen ) � seconded (Niooli) ^ �wfrw, rf , • aw+,uReawn§+YN'nrvd,+,e»rMwr.wnw...,,.,„,.r.,,..... .4«p."4+7w. '.{"r Yavw'f'h,.'�«'+..�`s1Yx .,.- r,nY w '� „ �',,. r -r w r•f .w+r:s.«+w ,++..www+.*w r aeFnarw tw q. q'abWN:.ti7t c �+ w« a..t k.:,.,,c, .-.......CM.....a-'..w+... ..:lJ da s',!-`-• ... .. ...:. ,.«..,..w.»:%.:',. ..wx .: a. c'•_-. .. w»ra.. ._ «.(v,.ztM a..,., .. a,. .,.....,.a:. L. t>.. Discussion by the Commission centered on confo:cmance with . the Comprehensive Plan and the question of spot zoning. It was a determined by the Commission that this would not be spot zoning and that the requested zoning did conform with the Comprehensive Plan Question was called (Smelser) 0 Motion to approve carried (unanimously) 5,2 Non-Conforming Use NCU 1-75 (Farmcraft Chemicals) An amendment to the Tigard Zoning Ordinance of 1970 clarifying • the rights of certain land owners with respect to properties, the use of whichhas become characterized as a conditional use after the date of_ commencement of such use q • Aa Staff Report ry The staff report was read by Powells Chairman HartMan asked staff if the square footage Y indicated p ..on the plans in the Commissionspossession was accurate saying that the 1300 square foot mentioned ih the staff report seemed in error. ,. q a Dist;ussion revealed that the square footage of the addition • should be 1710 square feet for a 14% increase in size. • Staff amended the staff report accordingly. Bb Public Testimony 0 Mr a Eagleson testified in his owri behalf. C. Staff Recommendation • Staff Recommended approval subject to designri review approval. Do Commission Discussion and Action w o Motion to approve the applicant's request (Hanson). with 4•. staff recommended condition. Seconded • Question (wakern) ! Motion to approve was carried (unanimously) 5'3 Zoning ordtnanoe Ameridn e zoA 4-75 d icerning conditional tlse status of a previou ly permitted 1.1e after e. tone chthget, PA08 Pd MINUTES : AUGUs,T 19, 1575 5 r , rw{rsw .•p>,+r.n kk,.Wan.;".,.raw,:n+yM>aunp,dr,lr ..rmw . ..w....,. .,..r^ -naww.rw+ «...a•,w.,..Y.ryn.w.+•.wow+•MMw+xMM:iM.rranrw.'eM ri{a.KYCYI}lj"ka:8{sdaRtlt91'lrrrixaUt.O..R.k4+ .• . • .. l Y • Amendment to thegayd Zoning Ordinance ofa �� �� 'clarifying ifying the rightsof oerirrdiri land owners With regr ' to properties A use of which has become characterized. as a conditional use after the date of commmenc•emeft of such use o A �. .Staff Report The staff requested the Planning Commission disregard the printed Staff report and. substituted a verbal staff report clarifying` the proposed. 'ordinance as proposed. by Mre Bailey, the City Attorn.eyo Bs Public ,Testimomy (See verbatim transcript attached C. Staff Recommendation } • 4 Based on the finding that the publicts right to !.. respond in betterment of a previous error or oversight in zoning or to respond to a change an circumstances in.-the' I, reighborhood require that the City be able exerc�se } =through its police power, a change in site controls on not only future derep.. lo' ment but on expansio . of existing .' development and based on the finnding that the rights of no one owner of land within a particular zone ought to • be superior to the rights of any other owner in the same zone b Staff recommends approval of they proposed honing finance amendment as worded by Mre Bailey with the g said. .. P _' . the y. erma.tted use a permitted clear intent �:o matin - use under the development restrictions of the new zone ; or code not the Old zone or coded Do „Commission DiAscussion and Action R f.. It was 'suggested that the matter be tabled pending further i. discussion in a study session. (Smelser• and Wakem) o Chair'an Hartman indicated thct he felt that the Bailer version �of the ordinance may be too restrictive that the modification suggested by Mrd Anderson may be overly 'permis "five a . o 'Waem moved to tabled Motion died for lack of second° Motion, to approve Bailey amendment • , Seconded byicoiri i Motion to amend t-lanson motion (Hartman) toir.cl�ude ex re ,uest of the City Axttorney that he clarify the word4i.ng in the prU� posed ordinance to identify whether the rights of the property p ty owner to continue developing or redevelop has site are n�a those in the one previously held or iii, the new zone n d Seconded H(Hansen) M1 Tg August• 199.' 1'975, wu.PrrvHxuwYwNMi At M.NMI1 N4.Qryw s^'+MY+'"^' .w+ ...•Y+ `•.•.. '' �, yY+m� a 9 K"+,, r .,..«•,,.r.«...r.«-....ww....«Y«..,,�„m,M.tm+.e +T;krrAwrrnr.:atr.iP+.�w+, ,.wN.4,n..i.w�r,� ' .. t Nicoli indicated his agreement with the amendment (No; vote was necessary due to approval of the previous motion's proponents) . • Question called on the motion as amended. Motion, passed 3 to 2 (Wakem and, Smelser voting no) . Hansen Y re best a memorandum from aq d the Chairman to asked anon why it took iso long for this oxo the staff ep g y dinance amendment to get from City Council to the ' • d Commission..Planning ,.. e Staff indicated that the memorandumwould be available at the next Planning Commission meetings 6. SUBDIVISIONS . ; (As indicated on the agenda, this matter had been withdrawn by the appIs.csant, to be resubriiitted for the next Planning Commission meeting) . a. 7. PRtLIMINARY PLAN AND PROGRAM REVIEW: (Westridge Park, SW 72nd . and Hunziker) o A recd eSt for concept review of the preliminary plan and program for a proposed. cornmercial and residential planned development at SW 72nd and HunZiker St. non iohnson, architect for the development, asked to be reoognited by the Cha ' � report was ` Chairman before the staff Mr. nt that the appllioan.t read statement plan and that the plan subm�.ec�ons�d ex s p • hub fitted to staff was now }void. Mra Johnson went on to , .d ... say that theyfelt that townhouses o similar medium i r a p� p inbetter densitymultiple deve�;,o men� would be the public interest and would constitutea better develop- ment Of the site p Johnson and Mr. Smi't". ` . e Motion to table ihe, item until Mr o � " resubmitted their development plan (Hartman) d Seoonded. (Wakem) 6 o Motion a roved unanimously, Pp 8, 0,1,88R tusixESS C aix an H,',irtitian brought up the topic of duplexes on 1.-7 lots'a He requested that the staff look into , �. an size ILr e 4�i.Fa enment for de°�re�opmen't o� increased lota„ ��, �s r . d sd Lot Sizes I' duplexes a.n. single family residential ><�µ�ne q f - ft 1 a. o� ,�,C�;oC)0 s ' � ft. in an R 7 zone 2Q�CC��i �°i�,a Pd Minutes "' August 190 1975 - page *.,i,t^ w,,.r v.rw..p,.4 1.».ww....+wr•,...r,..w..w, A + ,',,..5 j ' ''',''',' : '-'' ' ' '' ' ''' ,'• • ' 'l''''''- ' ( '''',1: ' ' ' ' , ' ' ', (1 ,'‘I'' ' ' ' ' . ' ' '* '' ''' k w 4 R—l5 zone and 30,000 sqe fto Iri an R-30 one were suggested. '' rea$,e in site size for ail residential A percentage nc ^ '' zones was also suggested as an alternatives it was pointed out, by staff that while this would help n the scale of a duplex to its neighborhood, frequently duplexes are sited on lots•• that are• un.desirable. for . ' singe family development and are therefore espeoiallY undesir°able for two family developmeitb0 In staff's .. eperienoe, the real problem is frequently poor sub-- . x t •dividing practice and layout. . . , . 4 .B't ►ther discussion dealt wit•h, the difficulties that ' may be encountered by a builder •in a poorly designed subdivI$10n arid of what future Planning Commission policies inay ,be with respect to these problems o DE . ry 9. AJOUJRNMNT': 10030 p b m o ,,; b;, e ,r. t pd Miriu,tee August 19,E 1075 , page". 5 . , FM'nV"wa,mM,,.+mn,nw. l.n++rlfxu.1.!I.INe«wfn:wnf. r+C.N+;w....w.W... .«.....+.,......., i�v �;.r r i u y,.m,.,-^ y.,r '�.Y."• +.• �4+ri. n. s�G�•,5^a�nxtJcx n�w,r.ar. r.: -,, . .�.. ,........ ... .. .,• ,,..� -"'^' � ��,� �? Y. su�lrtl FIY�+vrEtw+av'+ PUBLIC TESTIMONY } Fred Anderson 11 August 19, 1975 , { .., Planning commission meeting Deni 5.3 - Zoning Ordinance Amendment ZOA 4-75 'The pre-existing outright permitted use rende�ed conditional in the sense thatthe map or text was changed continues as an outright per y rnitted use, Now the question is -- is it an outright permitted use iS +`� in the pre-existing `zone or >�, an outright use in the new zone. 7 My opinion is that it is an outright permitted use in the old zone, , as of the old zone, and I'll tell you why, I think we are talking hrabout what the .courts have called a vested r'�,g ht. And I point to the leading case of Oregon called Clackamas County vd Holmes; r w dry case o In that... What I term in the vernacular, the: chicken foundry-�i.r business bought case, some people who were in the chicken pr ess g g . ' verylarger land_ . unincorporated� xoXiniate d The • builtas a tract of in the area of Cleckam inabout :1965. These dates are a greater County, pP road into it. They dug a well and went for' water much reater than you y' Pasture. They did a number of other things what would need for., pastor in furtherance of their orig^inalintention which the proved to eStablish, a chicken processing plant on this land. They spent between � hater � andthousand dollars on these improvements, SeVen years 30 ' 40 `� they went to the County to get a building permit, but the County re- fusedinterim the them on the grounds that in the he land had been zoned t` In other words, What they want to incompatibly with their objectiveb t r footings for their do is+ permitted use. They poured. their nota building, nonetheless, advice, A restraining order was on legal gdin b the Circuit the�il, restraining. � from proceeding Y served on o them court. The matter went to trial. The Circuit Court held against them. las I recall; It went to -� Court. of Appear ort of Appeals, t against them, It went to the Supreme p •. The o 'Wen g p me Cou.rto� interest Supreme Court Thee Su g . ij � ,.. that, which I think are. somen`tere s here, hadof recalltheymoney v this landspent considerable for the theyobou.g�t the inasmuch as ,. .is foxy a use that was outright authorized when th la did these improving steps, the? had accomplished a vested n,ci, and dry :.; • right and. they had a right to do it ar ,�'continue to +operate. , do �.t and ' construct their plant, build their plant and use it d. their plant, an n. they did. They did those things; the Court upheld their right to I do i)tu N`ow let 3 s analogize between that and the situation here. In Tigard this r in which have been worked we `,have two aspects 'of tm�iere� �beha�:f-ofO,�eat Western Chemical ` twohere ,, .^ quite recen lye am really qrailroads out t wa:rd Corporation; whose lands between the Progress had been developed; landscaped. They spent something over a million dollars, They have an area yet to be devvelopedb In other , worlds they are progressively developding their la :d0 Now the NPO #2 purported to 'change this class, fioat on of this land from M-3 to M-46 Their use by that maneuver is defined in. the M-4 as a ti on- ditional USS categ,b 'y and they have this Million or more dollars jiwested0 Now, if they were to ask for a conditional use for ohemi ti H . ..w.w.•<..,gnu.«..S,.nwum.,ww«nerd+wrw>?r.ro,ov,.w rx,.., ._....,.,,„....,,.,„..., ,,.,....�.....» .•e.w.c .+naN,T At+vltwssaVs+Y acW'i °^ ^^+1 �''' ✓*ru.:..k,....,.,l..:iaa4»...,.w....,::.;:.. «.xm.p,::a.......,'....::»,».,.......:- e... ,,,...,;,,kr.a.....- ..i_..:,.c,._:..,.+.e:s;,.,.ro.a x..mx...u,.r.. rx..c. -,.a,;.a.::�.c_..K ca.a-m_. _._ ... .r...., ,.:�.M .- ..,., .. . going ca � ,� bod a d be upin arms. Certainlynot o�n. n Nowy y , , toilet that harte' e ev�,rie 's take the other cage, recently the City 'Council saw fit to change many of the categories of uses out- d right along Pacific Highway ,west from outright to conditional. There i, g �� .. being" restaurants again -:many of the uses that. theychanged are "in b g" � 4 ;, Here again are vested rights and by the narrow view, if the narrow , es would be Precluded except upon r . view were cc�rnpat�,ble here theseues o. mi sione p p an application to the Planning G m s s seem to think that there� planners nothing� to getting Naw, of course, .� .. . haveobservedboth in use permit when you want one T a conditional this room and elsewhereuse is granted like other . that conditional pressure, things are granted, depending upon how much public how much 4a the outcry is and how the politics are, rather than by the merits. So it is a real threat to an owner confronted twith this situation. My thinking has been and is that this matter before you now is aligned g theory as much as anything el . Now you could say, C om thin to the extentthat it'ss a non-con- forming with this right but what about changings e g ' ` ' - .. forming use o In other words, you change <the zone so that, use is not permttted there at all. Conditional relevance: You got non con ,. ' f 'T V ming use in theoxy, In practice, as in the Holmes case, for right to con.tx�ue that. use. =t ,� r..on--conforming you e you ono �� vested , .. it what ....ou want too My point is: there is a m�.ghtasayi y had .. .:mind You call : � place g , :.. .. _ keep the firstin You right., to c ��- eethZ�thinkr hoou haveiinhe thing i n proper �.. develop that property. Yp perspective. I recommend that this wording (indicating y s Wording) or similar t . by . Council ., ordinance as a prt of the 1970 ]3aa.�:e • wording be adopted City byo save the Citya lot of money of Tigard in order this thing.o 3ecauSe I think4 zoning ordinance ,. d in arguments about t s g and not et �: on the Holmesnce.se�the City is vulnerable if it doesnt t adopt t this: but I dont want 'to con=y could suggest some other' wording, :C c 1dontt views gg } fuse the sitUation, I agree. with d'erry that perhaps expanding it with the optional additional phraseology might be going some distance, butcertainly inl his basic phraseology here is well justified under the .,ircums er ces e tt Terry You suggested .that the rights of the landowner under .; pre rio`us �v : include the ri,g._.A nod � You land ccovera eat ,:arking�spacemrequirements a zoningbe� re ( `red) If I understand You, you are asking me on the point that if there be a difference between those elements within a Previous z.:'ne and a new zone where you find a piece of property, which elements apply? (jerry k[' I am asking if you. are suggesting that all cif the sttr,ih,!+es e)f the broU' ht forward With the Permission for the use as ; prev�ouS zone beg Page 2 p ubli.c testimony - Po meeting 8/19/75/7 wTP'""M*7^"^Y^�"^M^"....a FtYi......NhNiwM'Y'Pd.. .YY..... ...m..... . .. +•vw.. M-•*"•pmt"""""am'MM'^^nxu+`.'NRq'M!n}!!tL4"Cgt^A9'kWi.YR'66CY,9 MfLtl4T".IfYY loVdmh:aVrm.rfwywi.N+. , 1 am outright ossa (Fred) Yes, I would sAy this, that keeping the matter in proper perspective, where a person had a piece of land and had started to carry out a certain ob ecte cane thattheycan °ove° and that' objective ob J 9 p , objective does • n a a tbacks of a new zone that they ma • not comport with the se Y be put in; and failure to comport with that would defeat their right to the Use of the land to attain their objective, I say the setbacks must yielda If that be not,all? Some more important:, much more important so, how, could Holmes have built a chicken foundry at yielded, The .• ? elements - element of contravening the whole zoning philosphyo Now I would go SteP .4'urther dy where the setback and other elements p ;;. are oom atiblewiththe objective, T would say otherwise 0 So I say that you have to keep these things in perspective. Does that answer your question/ (Jerry} -•. Doesn't, your suggestion give the owner of such a piece of land superior i hts to develo , that land than is common to others in that zone x� g p (Fred) That is, riot developed? , der ( ry D eveloped or undeveloped -- It gives it a peculiar set of rights tha- inh inhere orl aecause of previous uses real or e,ntioipatedo fi (Fred) Yes, but what better reason is there than the man who has already s lifetime le.rid his wealth to it it6 we have Mind that' there is ionstitution in this country too that sasnomantn property n . shall be taken ' ° a'thout just compensation, That is ,part of the same regimenz a i g' be to to be_ an arbitr°ar government as and onin has came as close Is . � i • supposed s ve.r�yb ody, Yet 4; here � but a. s p sed to the K�enei�-t o�, e there are limitations to it and this is one of theme And this is not dust Oregon, You., will find the vested right theory a. widespread • 'v`er the country,:: but youmeet certain guile lines 1 �f o have to � � �� o .o w in ... . pvest� d ? our aontext her'e- c ons i.d:��r° (' h�.s request) as ,t R�,s"t.���.�h,li e�� by the right more than anything. else }.' • ry Would you say that the vested right °theory, the not . n that ycu are adva � ing, i �vers���yaaoep�ed land lag g � Fred . , Not universally, I dont think they have that ln (Jerry} 'jniversa1 in Orregori, age " ub� cte t mon. meetin �l a .� .l.i.l.xl' iP. 1R1\l,..ul,i.! 1,.H e,V riK .L Y. xf rl.i•. 1.• .. . .ry. i . e v ...t . i. >li . ..•m. '.ii it. !'.•ur .. .. ...... .. . •'.,n ) yap ' . '1K4.Y AY.Yt9"'.1MVLI.U' I.W.Y a, ...i.. •. r ,l„ 1-!.aU.1..x 'CA, ..• ._...__4._n_...,.... ... Pv,._..r.a..P..r .'i. .,. f t x - ..•- .. • (Fred) Well, I would say that the Holmes Case is the law in Oregon You, only have one Supreme Court. (Jerry) l. The notion that a fright under zoning at a particular point in time is a vested right at a future point in time is the law? (Fred) YE s e I think the Ho lmes case is very much alike in the way we zoned (Jerry) No; I asked 'if the vested rights theory o 0 • (Fred) ' ' not a„theory! Would you allow that the Supreme Court case is It �.s the law in Oregon? Wait a minute! You called it a vested right theory (Fred) Sure,. but it is the law 4 The law is what the Supreme Court says is the lawn Until the case is reversed, it is the laws Aa much as if you had read it in the 1975 version of the legislative inaotments s (Don from Crestview) I did not come here to speak, but this aroused my curiosityo I would like tot p �know in�'a+�hypothetical situation what would happen. �.f a property owner° 1� owned a parcel of ground and set about improv ins it fora dunk yard and property owner "s” set about improving (lets �some both these hYpothetical development situations were permitted der the existing zone) the `djoining piece of property for resi». . 3. tiMO c had in fµd dental use. r.'o�.they, One knowing what the other =�r��.�e l m'�r�� a .. is at some point in time these sites become zoned res...J>e,.,.t±a'i. the 'i' that this man had spent some moneyto develop a juraL y ros go .ng to give hima vested right to go ahead with his pro`e a "�,��a�~ so than the guy who poured some money in his property for 4 How would that shake down in your opinion •(Fred) . • Well i seethem '8.8 s co mparable y ' We have junk yards - . � 1. Sided Nobody can them down because most of thew ve e . s non-oonforming So I would say the term junk Yard Iso of c°J.r, a . vernacular, It is a deprecating term and some of ties: des ° t .Again 9 looking atthe thing from the standpoint of ` rop ar",7', can conceive of a situation where the so-called. dunk 1:ard bsvP. a vested right and T thinkk, d (Don) What about the person who had put an equal a cnrnt o mox ey, ihto page 4 - pubilo testimony - Po mee ; ng 8/15/75 .l.v •• --.-"---�"""....,w+w...w'«�'�'m.P.nrv,. w�".�u..�,.wan„w.warw m�..,.x«o>u..a....«....,._,w-..e......,.,v .; - • ... - i, - '' • • • • development for a residential purpose? (Fred) I think that is true toga I think he could have a vested right, (Hartman) The existence of a junk yard would preclude the existence of the resi- dential area and make it less desirable. But Still the fact that the jiunk yard was there and was a • �° permwas established • would mean that it would be allowed ttoacontinuenit as a permitted use as long' as it remained in business If it went ,out of business and . remained out of business for a set length of time, it could not be re-establishedo r (Sineiser) 1 I think the situation that the staff is trying to address here is where propertybeen . developed or iS intended tdeweloped for a specific use does that mean that forevermore, regardlessof change of zone, that property can continue to ex and for that intended use? (Jerry) .,. It,seems to me that the application ofvestedrights pp . the ra hes principle in • this particular issue that is before the Planning Commission almost precludes the public 's right to,,'better previous errors, oversights or Changes circumstances Irl y Oregon��h:ases inyt,r��x.ch' the Supreme Court. of the State of: specifically Said must .be recognized (by subsequent actions) • (Fred) that since, gHolmes s c� and , • anything the court has said n alien between the Ho, e .ase f . I yon t feel there is a�. thy. act . • g , the Holmes case only came down in '74 And if I am not wrong, it probably followed Fasanoo Fasano came down it '73, (Hartman) I would like to hear what alternate wording yoou ha"t .)ronospd for thine (:Fred) well, I am hesitant because I hope that you ry l mm* u . tha'L i-* , jec` *Ve be ,attained, HHew you got there is pe 'tape so,104Y, ie. y, 1111 read to you what I have here Whenever a previously outright pe fitted use oateg ry Is relegated to the conditional use grouping an r-e gar; =ia • zone or another zone' all wholly or partially developed r p ... then in outright use status in any such ',''',171e shall Y' .. ties incidents � - , . °, ,_,- � er retain all the incidents of prem-exist .ng; out rg • _ .se cl,assiKw n �A ficatio .ppl ,oable to ► uc ] r.�perty .Wnc:l:.udin . p • expand- alter, change the extent of area or use for c , pre- { existing use o s e� page 5 testimony' 'Po meeting 8/l9 w, . .. _ - �.wwM+�..•s.»v.:.,w.n ••+Y.Mwx Lnna+.�u,L•,N{Nea atlr�.x�u't[M�.w.,rv..�.,..+w.•r.,...»�.«....._t.....y......�.w..r.,�,.s•••.•••w,...»wwr..w«.+.....•w�Mmsnii+'hae!7�ttCtls!an::�Sra:u�t.ESVcyw.rn�w.wwx+.+w.weiwf,r ....,�v • r , I have another ones 1 Property wholly or Partially developed and in use , in anyzone for anyoutright g Permitted Purpose for that zone when such use purpose is reclassified in the same zone or a different zone to a conditional, category shall retain all use rights previously available to such property under its outright use • category pre-existing the reclasSification so long ' as such pre-existing use continues including the e right to expand, alter, or change the extent of area I. or use of such pre-existing... p g, Use purpose. Now, I think that all I have done there is maybe use more zonin jar on histhbecause an Coia.ncpl has Bo1ies Joe � did. I would rather See you recc mmend R p n it is already submitted in writing. i My purpOSe is to get the job do a a? and not to argue about the words. ' or thought y the Planning Staff would find fault . with Joe s felt o�. that Maybe Wording, so I had an alternative to offer. .., (Hartman) y g posed ordinancep y clear, on everything that the pro .. p am not surethat lI 1em completely "the. owner of the land shall have all of the rights he would p s. ere thisgordinance ates have had had the use r remained a permitted use in the new zone"0 That seems to me to be m! : There is a difference on these matters of setbacks and landsca e d g e between had the use remained a, permitted use in, the new zone or uhad the land remained, under the previous zoninau 9 and that s ms to me be the crux of the matter right there (Fred) Well, I discussed the Staffps proposal here with Dick Bolen. I r i didn't discuss it with Jerry d And I think that there is ambiguity in the proposed: changed If you intend that the property rezoned � , have all the elements of outright zoningp p y onet,� would so severely restrict the owner that he couldn't new zone, that might .,, purpose. am suggesting' you that the �yJ + wy� toproper p,,�.:o se It r.,� . �b to permit the, what w ap oh I oho 8ese to call' elements emex��1 N to remain applicable to the property -- a property that rp a par 7 a ly developed for a given continuous, purpose ose �-� µ , _,, ''. ;� necess rily zoned forany' Use that it might have beer~, .sr' "o�y ea °° down the scale 20 OP ',-")0 Uses —,-, t for that p°�e-e��i���t�Nw�a' —,-, but . `" .• e Hai"tIiian For ±he pre..existing purpose i t will remain ina ; in effeot pre (Fred) Well, Yes, it will remain thein re-existi w tor Ate ,Ftl .� establ�.Sh pre � rig:.. zones ,fir �� �-� N.�,� ��. �a� ed: use �,. d . public testimony page 6 - pc meeting 8/19/75 w rn.oe,,,m,.wex,..,tivY«xaa,..i,o;,r.an+w..pro..w..,. .M. .r..«..«,...n.,.v ,..,.........m....My.,...,ra..,:...ww+..»...«»r...,...«..-.wFw.w..»« .irep4mntm.MMalrYgMe' ku<azsrraa,a+Ga'eafkeenru,aya' mw.na•.,...«wt.,°wYar 4 (Hartman) And that seems to me the point that is not clear is the way this is written right here. The way this ordinance is written it seems to me that it remains a permitted use in the new zone and what you are saying is that it should remain a permitted use in the previous zone according to the rules of the previous zone. (Fred) This is what I am suggesting (Hartman) Which is quite a different kettle of fish (Craig Eagleson) I I understand this correctly, this (ordinance) doesn't forbid a 1. chemical company from expanding its business operation; however, it can't expand its business premises based upon the code of 20 years ago e It will be allowed to expand tinder a conditional use permit according to today's code, under which the building will have to conform to architectural designs landscaping and so fortha This doesn't mean that the company til. . not be able to continue in business. Right? (Hartman) (under the proposed amendment) , Farmoraft Chemicals would be allowed to expand their building Without the 20 percent limitation. It `would it were apermitted in zone be allowed to expand as though usethe it is` in right n"ow,, but would still have to conform to whatever set . back and landscaping rules are embodied in the new zoning° Isn't that correct, Ferry? Whereas the way MF0 Anderson sees it, it should be set up so that he Would be bound by the setback rules and so on of the previous zone rather than of the zone he is in now (Fred) well, I didn't exactly say that. On. x`61:41'y's that Where adhering to the s ;tba z or oth,e1. changed. would interfere with or would defeat h intenticr16 t�'M f a+.a have "1 ..`."Y, �:(') F t}'»� ;..1 Kx,. owner may prove, then T say the se tba....ke + y�I[,,,vy,.�� y "yy are compatible (with the intended, c�,s�w) �, then the),,, What talking itabout " #` . �:=°� .-,ee �; * �,, , ,. .. , But at we ale basically tali'�rxg a.� � �� . �� � <��.�� Hyl,; . ' basic use. I think you've got to keep in m Rd the basic It-;..'e; - n can the property owner use that p' 'operty for a ` i p s brove, and rt say r'ov'e, as a part of his overall ° ► � ; �`� ,. w. uild Rome in a day 6 You don't build a plant t-. ob vein a dain �p r rdiy If�� the process of rli ldirxg progress ofthe building the' Citychanges its ruyes tt'frtuhem'r some proteotion0 For instance, could be building M 5 the rafters up fora 2 story anis.: you all of a audder. �,; ., �,� ,;.> a iy have a single e stor ' thea.. See what I mean Samt, page 7 - public testil otiy pc meeting 8/19/75 ..n row.ra..o+,.urw+.:nyry.qtr.ua.-.w.af,ya„Yax,h+fmmn••w..,y+v•.,nr*�* ..yre,.,p---.•-..»..Mpr.ww.r......'+'.wq..., ..w,r+.+nlrmr+,n,r�Cuna:AM am»a,'W 1^.4eti'7cNNnr' 'V"Mwrw4 k.:..,..r.ti...-ri.+ni;w.-t--r ti>riH mdrvAnx..b'v!+.n.ur+7r,+«.;.,....,r..,(--.':;::A3,1A. .9...J x t.....a•t r.?-. • r3 r (Hartman) {1. �RM F I don't think that is reaching too far because Tigard does have rules • against a 3 story housed :.: (prod) .r r I only have` 2 _in my case (Hartman) Yes, I know, but, the analogy is there; at a point in time in the past • Tigard changed its rule to disallow three story houses (Fred) If the three st&ry had the rafters up. . , ,r. (Hartman) They would be entitled to finish it, but the guy that bought the lot net door couldn't' build a three story house (Craig Eagleson) '. I have seen incidents where some gUy has sat out on a corner of a i street with a little grocery store on an acre of,land. Thro�ungd all built e beautiful resso ofaassudden' he thinks he has a ..00d thingthere so he decides to �» s g • buildwhich,a supermarket as ahYbodY anybodycan seep would not be in the right location for a supermarketp But if I understand Mrs Anderson's '. p_ ould be allowed to go ahead and; build a supermarket rop asal-, hew there bec6use he has been in business there as a grocery store. (:Fred) You misunderstands I did not say that. (Hartman) I,don¢t thin ~ ¢. as time�we x,aag, k that would be unless he had went �.,���� y�•,.•.� g � making larger g ta:nued adds to his .More �.t la»r er and a� �.r�r�1n it. . (Craig) His intentions were e he was in business and, he wanted 'to er# . .t > r (Fred) No, now wait a rintxte feu ti re engrafting upon the +' . +h, A f, ne eleme��.t w as this intention and intentions are measur w� �, w . ) harbored intention . ' was ,this intention a 6k'bra wbrdslans at the time he started a grocery store r, { effect by, p (Craig) yes, because he auurohdsed an, acre of ground or 5 acres .rt • • Page 8 " pgblic testimony tooting 8/l9/7 r F t }. a �..nm„r..kw*usr..nn.mmrin,vµy.n«,gtW�'A»+..rt1l„q,sr.,..w>...»pr w,. r. .......,.. «..r.....,agt•»,««.... +w,.«,..y..«,..ea.kh,e,aY+writs"•ut9Ac'rmYex%' war3la»,o.it+Wrar�i4YW+exw.+wgw.+w�:w'M M -•. r , • (Fred) Make the su ermarke eory. All these ; it f�.ve acre s e.nd I' o Quid bu�'�\., � th.�.nt • gas ��: subject' 'ect'to the facts=that pertain to them. You change these facts andA you are changing the -theQ1-ngY°; In the chicken case You facts. remember the facts and, theyare established The so in a continuing chain of thatthat. O.K. ow manybusinesses,the. had done this, found ' accomplish �this and is like yo��, said, wouldsbeothesae way. They dont .Oust come into being. Let's don't tike Washington square, They`.are still building, aren't they? That is ' t all under one ownership, i.snit it? Yes, it is, and so they have a laid out plan whichis given effect year by year over 10, 20, 30 Now you saw off the thing in the diddle. That is what I . Years. ark talking about • . Public Hearing Closed. • • - - • .,, page 9 - public te6t3.moriy - pc meeting 8/15/75 ii , .+w.,.t...r.nweawr+,amp.yr.m�;.ve,..w.r..Y^ Y s.,w,Mp«,nttr+a...u.eaaa.n,•.•.••r r--.•.•••-r••••_•..••ner w,w....+.•.::..........wpw....;wwwr«:.r wv11Ma�1VFw`utfra3'",YiKuiarY�uimiYwtrlasw '�'td Ys« wW IYti ) ' • • • STAFF REPORT Tigard Planning Commission August 19, 1975 Agenda Item 5.3 Zoning Ordinance Amendment ZOA 4--75 (Amendment to Chapter 18.12, General Provisions; regarding conditional use status) Applicant •1:V City of Tigard ' . Applicant's Request The City Council directed the City Attorney, Joe Bailey, to draft an amendment to the zoning ordinance which would stipu late the rights of property owners who, as a result of a g ( p ext) have the status of their existing n from ) Xlstl g , zone chane an outright permitted use `to a .conditional use changed p use. The attached ordinance draft is lir. nailey's response. • Staff Finding 1. Mr. Baira yrs proposed L zonin gg ordinance amendment is intended ntended to insure that an existing permitted use retains all the puse, in spite of a' zone change (map rights of a, ermined use category. or text) which laces it in the conditional g y While the intention is to maintain, the existing use on ah p equal basis with otheroutright permittedPlanning uses,. .the �. g. concerned that�theLlanguage suggested goes beyond L. • ngit , affected+uses equal' and actually staff n the status of the H. mak , bestows rights u on these properties which their counter- arts (other permitted uses: in"..the tone) not have.For instance the language suggested sttesThe owner of , Such land. shall have, all .of the rights he would have had had 'the use remaineted use a, !permit d ' . " Staff is con cerned that this wording, could be construed to entitle a developed (or artiall developed) a p tights p y � . � piece of property to all elo�'�ed permittedthe old zone, rather than Of the asfintentioned'Staff -suggests this problem s ,g, g . . g X11 " the neW wording to read, the ' Y SUCh �. ' could be rectified b in . 'the w owner of such land shall . ,�p� d ' istion includinY but a.f a 1 have all of the ri hts of erml e uses in the .. , amended :zoningcl ss 4 g ht _t nd or contract the use of • �-.,the .rig o ex a . r limited o s trup�ures no the operty, or alter any j... The!`additional wording pr ov`d.eo. for consideration by the Itor,. to. charm e =the use. is any other ,use which. states, � �•, wasoa permitted .use at the time of, the commencement or p creation,,.of, 'the permitted use,. " This addition the staff it goes even further `toward fends unacceptable because -t o the subject properties rights gra ing eclus�ve i ► , be sharedeby other ro,._.erties in the tone: � wh�c�. Wil) not Y p � staf ' Rec 0th y mends.tion r L TO be advised after the close of public ,hearing -., .,: r.:.: _. r ,.... a. .. .:,,.,w•, r.• n rxMU+'_x.mlrraptt#w+,>,V",' A.,aw3cwxrzlwl' r.yi y ,.., 1 M*jnfM'.trxr +J.m w•+ry'1•Af...w.91yIYVrr1 UNl..w1 Y _ I 1 "'1R' • • ..".1.+1a...M:.f', -.,7„.._.::v r.,.-.,X...::,„L„try:->.r.M., .-,,: ,,.. .,,.r ,. v,..T::„L".+t,L.. r ..,k .,J.'.. t, .-1'-4A txe.x n w..—.J..,t. ,-s, -.. ., �. ,'1 . r k ♦u 14Gf, rE ' y', ..0 '' DRAFT CITYF ,., "Y,.. OTIGAR D, OREGON i L ORDINANCE NO 75- ,I, AN ORDINANCE,'� . . REGAR k �P' ' AMENDING ;THE CITY OF TIGARD ZONING ORDINANCE OF H D i 19."/0, CLARIFYING THE RIGHTS OF CERTAIN LAND OWNERS V�IIT , ,” TO PROPERTIES, THE USE OF WHICH. HAS BECOMECHARACTERIZED AS A CONDITIONAL :USE AFTER THE DATE OF THE COMMENCEMOFSUCH ENT USE L,4 THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: r ' Section 1:'j The zonin ordinances of :the.Cit of Ti' and c eatin . ' the 'various land-use zones describe uses which are permitted in each z cine; and, in a, number of instances, also describe , ,w uses which are to be permitted as "conditional uses” within each zone. p Section 2 g The Council finds that the zoninordinances of the f' city '.g o not describe, with sufficient,clarity, . of. Ti and d the right of the . . owner of a arced of its use, conforms in, that ; development .or use to the provisions of ,the applicable zoning ., , � + , mitted use" ;,-Which4 land, F., is thereafter affected b .. a Chan e in a zoning' ordinance rendering g p , the existing use permissible within that zone only as a "conditional - . uses Section 3 In order to make clear what "rights' the owner of . •'� , land such as that described at section 2 above shall have, the following language is hereby added to the city of Tigard zoning ordinance of 1970,= where it shall appear in the Tigard ' Municipal Code as 'the Section following 18. 7? 030, the Codification of Ordinance 72°-52, sedtion 5, 1972 and ordinance 72--32,, section '; , . 23-3, 1970. When a use i , ' iise itch a .way as to ; s orice etablihed an s . ., p0 rmitted use, and not, a conditional use and ;not' a � he a e.. . ' onconf� g i ge the het zoy n.ing ormn use and thereafter a clan,e in � ,; °" the laof�197Obt a renders the fo;rmerl f `; finance classifcat.Lon of , Tigard �on�.ng ord ,. erns tted use a roriditional useheowner of. such ,laid Shall h' g s ave all. .of the ",tight he would have Had, had the 1 . ,i;'''''' ' .:'''.:' ,..,.,.,.: .. �� �. ncl ding,r. but :no l�.m�. e use rezttained a_ ermp�:tted use, � M = r , he `use of the proper.ty.,r., y � to„ ex and..,ocontract t .,. . . ,.�- . , .� or, alter airy strtictu es ,; P, 1, To' the Council: " H; The folow'ing language ould be added after the rota z w strticture r to � or to change the useariy; other use wh ch ., : w`as a permitted„use at" the time of the commencement or creation of the permitted u'se Y g . ,' ri .. .... r .,r n *i 4' .. ,r.. m.w ..+.�rr.j, �u 2. .w, A , ,.�.i�,y�,ni , �r,r. .. � , - . .-.., ....,. rr»...� ..u, n..wNu.w.«»wMwu� �'*+r.kn.'m�+ .ae1'p rrA urrs211iaYu{mwiAmuueaw�K� w.w.ywL ,u '. l „. ,, . ,,.wr....,.j..;,,::wr,V ,,wr.,�.if«...,�u'anw,r...n:r,.+.+F..;w,..W..,.n,.«A.w-M-a,.,.,...1'.,rJ.iL..,t.nR astir,,.r,. a..,'. u,.i,..:txw,.<—ita ti444v1.,x.Y.,.4m1,4.,«in..:,^,,.1....4,1.. R.l r4b.tf;t.y,,..x,..,.r..,.-w.Z.+, .",0%��.k,.. ..,1x .N.a.+.w.:..,A.,.,".I.,..... r.,4.,,,,....s.,,,,i �.+, .,:. H..1...u„w.."wr.,-r,+,.•, .r.,u- . � i • �° .1 f . i N•''''`.....,1',11.auxwi=,a'+•N•w'•++' ,,44.,,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,I.4,440••,... X+W+.,.u.41:ul+r-Vsu.r l.«4t.ri3r.YUP=.t1,•.,.::.:W.:1i'!'1,..4,41.wu ,.•1nWuw:t+«dwi,:a6Tdilil i,.....'',,,d s a.:,.16th.wY,>'�41�. 4,44.7 urih1k;rda.Vr4,..4'�a a,,f :.kLrY5•_r r ....t�4 w,. s..wkl,.irrwLiii4tlu:.l w r*r.•ilS1 , , jc ` r f�f�1� ,AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION R v t �...+G,..���� 't' ,•f;.,��,'+�����.,., y1�='.�f es "4als�r.7,�''t� • °t.'N' 1TICE,Qlw' -1 AARYNG ; • i���+ 1� n STATE OF OIftEGON, city'Q i''--All .''y t i a � q 1975 ��, 1��� � rr COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, 4lay lv . F Iat public'` !, ���A�� 1'�CitiG�a�i6a't"� � 1? .,, ' CITY' 01- henna giswi1i Whe1 'by t`hb 11 anning,. , A,' orimtsst` o e'Cit 9f Trgard'in th •,. . ,y Olt, � x it x, a ►.., x �' . ...L1.. A � � r'll"'Stot �.®ctreF� dee ,weriu txigardk.. ,,; l r goon 5ai` 4 ea r s it,`�'Sitf'ot.cu...ori,' being first duly sworn, depose and say that I aiim •the publisher E; xC �:. �... Z? 'X t.) �'t) �.�,�',."u,h�t�. _.�� �,�'"t;l�u.. r..��eC 1 L�.,..r,,�Y2`t •('t��'�.,t.( �J., th`a't "` :j �,"� F��L 4- � E 1) I q 7S� iu1 PROPOSED CRITERIA' FOR REVIEW (Ch. 18.59)' 1. Buildings and structures on the subject site shall present a finished appearance to. all streets and to areas of public access or view. • 2. Architectural style and scale of structures, signs and landscaping will be appropriate to the use p intended and be compatible with existing surrounding development and with the intent and standards set forth in the Tigard Community Plan and any specific plans • promulgated for neighborhood, distrLct or area. 3. Overall design of the project aa-well as the architectural design of structural components and landscaping Will reflect and be compatible with the site topography and adjacent terrain. • It External mechanical 4 and electrical' a aratus and other' elements of functional designdesignn will be inte raped into the treat • merit of the site and/or building. 5. Design and placement of luminaires, directional signs, identifi- cation signs and all signs . reuiring a Sign Permit will be integrated into the design theme of site and building in such a way as to Complement the aesthetic quality as well as the utilityof the ite and its situation ' 6. No sign need be so large, so high or placed in such a way that it competes_with or overpowers other elements of site and building design. • 7. sighs Will l not be placed in any location where interference with scenic vistas will result. 8, signs will not be So placed as to . interfere with Vision of or draw attention from traffic Signs or signals, or road hazards« � 9. : Sign area, setter willheight and sign placement be related.. to traffic speed and volume and to the capacity and classificatioi of the adjacent stree� The' s . l ;shape; colors; letter style and. site s shall be•considered with rres.��ect to their a"pro `'r .ateness � > � ,, pp p to the bite and situation, their aesthetic quality) legibility, and ihf4critiatichal value /6 .,etre/r o, i"t° ref Ott, rPt'eS •4/ /r-t 0. . s 41:tti ,>e iy ` C � f , "j � �� r1fi"t,t// Li c r�71 `l * C'4/ (1 qm 7+mrV!.«+y'+.W✓vv-.a+..0"+k'"vuHwry o/wry4v+`y"'•twM'hmfi"M"s.w+ww«««,aw w .nWwac,.++C..,w.du«^.vtlr..r.w,v++x+nuYy+ nFa-ItlM+k1 . .1lg+tib"19:kiFf#0'a.1i( t ✓id+im` +I4i.k • S ..�:,w .. .n;., ,..,- - .:,,..,v ..,..- �... .- ,r.,!._a:swrc6,...J� 'tkN_7..r1....x,.k.c5,..„'1.S:t.i;•YA�Y'S.e4::x,1.,�•,F',k«�S - ` {}1,1._x, . ( _ :u,l�4 4}M......a .4.0 h,.....WaY1'.11-a.....W«Pr,.,'4‘,4,4..4,01....V.4,...44,.a44144 k#.a....4(4r Ali., `, �o•,- 7p1 sw www+noi.avyMsu.,wr,.,.,.�,l.,w•vwfeF:,+rra,x '1 trl r AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION t . ..BLIC,HEARING `,'µNOTICE OF PUBLIC ` t,,,,ICI!1',Y„,,,,,O,F,,,T,,IGp,RD PL,F.�NINGCUM- "�_ ,. ,i- j STATE OF OREGON; 't, ,,,;-•-•-4•111,.;,,!., ,�M XS510�1��;��'H���'�� ,'., w' ,, y 1 .tys r� ss: `'`' atice is hereby giVeri; that public;" �` CO�JNTY OF" WASHIP� rT01V, "the Planning � � • � t�"Y hearings:will be held by, Commission of the City cif Tigard in ther"• Ju S f;p Schafer �+. 1Twality Junior `High School Lecture, 97th Avenue,Tigard, ` I, ,��.. ...}... ...-i _ Ftooiiti l4650�W,;�. � � , A ~' say'that TQre"goneSaid heriigs ywill..iiccur on ;, sworn, depose and am' the publisher ..... P -,...„-q, r� being first dulyrxl,lt -1975 at... ,P Mr and will con , .... : +/' + � x.. ai 1fut�r try, �a �" 1 rhe gr•;' +1l*Y,> , -t- y ,• far,. . cle£inea t ';,�,,4 request' %b , Geroge Seoti. �x .rn, he followin .,,...-r,r,,....}.-,.- ' raval of a subdivi-w of The Tigard Times a newspaper of general circulation, asp y pf Tax x . . ,~ p Fand ..art,of 1001]� . til'Preliminary Plat Ap .> tsy ORS 193.010 and 193,020, published, at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and Wash inglon•: •unty„ Tax x Map.. l5l` „�.�,�'located•"approximately 0�, feet j.'� f state; that the legal notice a printed copy of which is hereto ann execl' was •south of SW GreenbUrg Road on SW,w 98th.Avenue,, d tt,, ..,," . . >'• '�;,.i. '.'•'; _ successive and g '. ✓I""Proposad amendments to the,Zonin I�ubll in the entire issue of said news" a" er or �... .••- = 4 e�Ordinance of the City of Tigard the fdl- 'shed i sng i ' .w in .1,:'-i'',... f r be considered for"re,-,. consecutive weeks in the following issues .i ,}}x..Lx._._. L_. 4�.axi..._1.:.-•_L.. :L+•i }=--. 4 ,'x� ' lowing chapters to vision: ,,.. �r ..'�" } {��y1 -9s'Industrial Park: Zone. (18,52) ,_34_ -_1LwK.__.xi-_ir}-:{}i.1}....i:-x..;:+.}i..ww.r.�i ax..}}.i" /y1/� • ;�.}..�....._.x>.}..-.._.-._.-. >....`� _ ,w_:..i.i _i_... � C:P,Cozi�;m�rCammcrcialo 181288 Mal:ex.._ i'i V) 4 , u •._- : c, 'R-7,Single Famil Res deritiai 18 ' 0 (Sig attire) g. y ( ) General (18.12) ,,'" t, 4.. f... Site' . lop (19,58).-,".- e �hiUtecttirament Plan e�liew (18.59) • .i}a.L4y-}•L.:•, day of •_:}}::}:x: Design R sworn to before me this }..:2} ' - M x Flood Plain 18.5 . w;.Y. ,.x " " r Subscribed and � 7) • a.p ;''Administration (18,92) : ' . March 9 ? c'''' All persons haVingr atiinterest in 41 . ,.i4.,.L. } >i•Y}•F.:1}H:}::. �. these'm a eters tire h`Vited;to attend and .g lie heard. r• .x r w h „. , T } «i.}Lii:l }ii} wx.--�L 77-,:....- } 1ti11«w (TT 2318 ;P' u lis""p March 27, 1975) , �iL. iY_-.}.i4i-iiiu}xii.ai}ri}}, L} wNrL 1- 1 4," Notary PUblic of Oregon ices }f i9 Mycornmissiot' exp i s.._L�}w:.:i4�.�i.:4}}. .:.i�:..}.}: >. ,_,r a..a.W." .ur,:,yu.. +e .a.,x4;.4""MxtNkM'9...,..4...14-4.147041-011.0,......041.4.0...4.,....,..41.0.10,4,..'',,,4•4,.400,•••.,,_,.4Ct,pA•*Art.,... ,'. xr._.�•, .. �, .,. :n.,.�nu.e rrx.+4r+x na+.x,r. ., , r t.«art.r.:1,ry�.;,rn1 Y,:+�..,y...�dwuu..••e,•'� k•^,.,m ..,.,...,.•...-..•-r.r...aw«n+,v.....w.««.....o.»....... .nw,.n.win+tomer,}K....xrofwiralM,R"Bn,"N.a"7L+`laNW1AwM1Ar'.utw^ynxp,44hxry.mwiww.µ,y' ' 1 • ' • _ ! DRAFT ,, CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 75-- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF TIGARDZONING ORDINANCE OF1970, OF CERTAIN LAND OWNERS WITH REGARD T CLARIFYING THE RIGHTS TO PROPERTIF S, THEBECOME CHARACTERIZED AS A CONDITIONAL USE AFTER�T©E DATE HOFAT . HE COMMENCEMENT OF SUCH USE o THE `CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: : Section l:, The zoning ordinances of the City of Tigard creating the various land-use zones describe uses Whichare uermiwtedhin nreach• be ie4, ain a. nuir�ber of instances, also describe Permitted as conditional se within each •' uses" zone.. r. Section 2:. The Counci:L finds that the zoning Ordinances of the city of Tigard do not describes With suffcient,claty �g" pa .. .. , time of development or at the commencemen , . the ri ht � of the owner of a rcel of land which at the. development or t of. , s in that ,its use conform • classfz.caton, .ubea.n� classio1esions of .the�applicable . '" g zonin g d as a permitted USE which land is thereafter affected by a chap Y � g'e in a tonin ordinance tendering, the existing use permissible within that zone only as a conditional • use. '` 3 : order to male Sction clear 'whatrights the owner of In land such as that described at section 2 above shall have, the following 'lan qua e is hereby addedy tonin ordinance of 1970- w g � g. to' the cit of Tigard g , here it shall appear in the rPiigatd 4 Municipal Code as the 5ection following 18.,72, 0'30i the Codification of Ordinance dinance 72w.52section 5, 1972 and Ordinance 72-324 section 233, 1970 : 4 ti r r, • When a use s once established in such a way as to.a permitted use, and not; a conditional use and not a' pOnconfor ning usei, and thereafter a change in the " on ,ng classification of the land, or "change , in the dity of permitted use ardondteoof ;:197 = the t.ormerly. '. Ti atd toning 0 renders p naluser. the .owner .of such land sShall have all Of, the tights, he would have had,„ had the u .emained a ��erm�.tted use, ' � includi.ng, but nota._ ]:imited to, .:the right Tto expanc1 or contract the use of the prbpertY : or„aiter any structures To the Council The follbwing lan to e could be added aftet the Wo td % °Struct ire0 . or to Change the use to any tahch ath er 'use ..et fitted Use at i ,, aY p n� the t�.rtie o nr�enlentr .,,..� � the comms or creat�.on yh pertitted use u of ty 1�4 ,. •� .w..+lx....µ+`^,ri,+""t'/ +.'bMYomeeCf/4dJMtFiC°tl'ATIDF.rYwtSpS4'M'fRR,CIn4.JAYwrwW ' b/'�I�YI. , 1 - CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON• ORDINANCE No.' 75 -- _ � r , AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18.72 (CONDITIONAL USES) OF THE TIGARD PROVIDING A NEW SECTION, CLARIFYING THE RIGHTS OF CERTAIN LAND OWNERS CODE, .., wITH REGARD TO PROPERTIESTHS USE OF WHICH HAS • BECOME CHARACTERIZED AS A CONDITIONAL USE AFTER THE DATE OF THE ' COMMENCEMENT OF SUCH USE, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE. DATE. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS S F'OLLOwS s '. Section 1: The zoning ordinances of the City of Tigard creating the various land-use zones describe uses which are permitted in each zone, and, in 'a number of instances, also describe uses which " are to be permitted as "conditional uses" within each zone. • Section 2: The Council finds that the zoning ordinances of the City of Tigard do not des'c ibe, with sufficient clarity, the . rights of the owner of a.,parcel of, land which,• at the time of develop- ' ment or at the commencement of its use, conforms in that development or use to the provisions of the applicable zoning classification, .being classified " use": which 'land is thereafter �as a "Permitted use rendering the existing affect use permissible on.lynasca conditional. use. ft Section 3: In order to make clear what rights the owner of land t shall have, the such as that described at Section 2 above following language is hereby addedr to the-„City Cit of Tigard, zoning where it shall appear in the Tigard Municipal ordinance Of,..e9ti 8 0. 0 " the Codification of Ordinance ' .. nc section . � Code as the Sect�.on9721and�Ogrd.�.na72e 70� 32; 23 3, 1970: 72 52, section 5, l When a ...use is oce .estab nlished. in such a way as to be: a ermitted use, andnot a conditiona use an no a noncsonformin.; use and thereafT-677.-a--EFiaTi- 7—E77HT7Eliii-7F-.717EFa ' • c assi ication of -:,t e land or a. chane n the Cit of •arch z nen or^.inance of 0 . ren•ers, t e ormer erm tte,d: use:. a ,coed t ona use he owner of suc and s a , r. ,._..._... . �v;e awl ofe. •ri i s �e wou; ave. r a a• . e use. rema ne a. ,.:•erm t ed _use nc u • u .nod" • .m e o t e r o e c or.. contract ' "ie use of i' e ro er o ter_an�s ruc:tures Section 4: This ordinance shall be effective on and after the of its assn e b the Council and, approval 31st dad P � y PP ) ' by the Mayor: . . PASCED. Bybets present vote of all Councilmem this day of ..; . . , 1975 APPR.ovED» This ,;, _ day of y 1975 Mayor .01.D/NA.Ndt No 7 - : . , wi- n.n �°"°yy^gr