Loading...
ZOA3-86 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. City.of Tiger` -""'"Ch t. 18.32.310 a&b To .. VP:: ,�...R rt. *r.evj,:ew of p1 a;catiox by. t'i .' K-,-R.»,., .'.«Y,=+kKA+«W.F�dai..d:-.4r.{s dw..+ap,-.. '"L..✓�,.;... .a,„.t,•:s :,Y "k rr.k r.+..'M.•Y`..r wwro+a•wti > '-'* r . ., wt-"w.^.•..e�-- -ho.el2.:w.w.+..�\ r t.=acrrm.Ytrw>}aY.aw:wn�svx !t+ry a' • 4 .' ...4.f . ig g , i 4 • L a r CITY OF T]CARID; OREGON 4° �, ORDXNA SCE:''NO. '86-.2E.. AN 'ORDINANCE. AMENDING SECTION 18.32.310 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE.(27.0A 3.86)' WHEREAS, .Section 113.82,310 of the Community Development Code alllows the City Cosnc .l and Planning Commissions on its own motion, to hear any land use • y ' :.. action approved by another •approval authority by a resolution .filed within.,10 days of the pub1icatiorn of the notice; and W EREAS, the reso't4ition requirement poses problem3. of a resolution hash not, been prepared in advance; and WHEREAS, the Planning staff has recommended to the Plannin Commission that the :;notion for .ew by Council or Plannin Cors ission be approvable by voice. { vote; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed 'staff's recommendation at .a public hearing; on July 8, 1986 and voted unanimously to recommend to City Council that Section 18.32.310 of the Community Development Code be amended, and „ . publ:.c hearing - , On �'ulgt, 28, 1986 the City Council held a � g t®• consider the Plana*aing Commission's recommendation. THE CITY OF TICARD ORCJA NS AS FOLLOWS Section 1: Section 19.32.310 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall be amended. as • : follows. Language to be added is underlined. Language to be deleted is shown in [brackets].. (a)(2) The Commission or Council, on its otcart motion, seeks t() < the matter by [a resolution filed] voice: vote within: 10 days of the publication, of the notice as provided by 18.32.240(a). (2) The Council or Commission, on its own motion, seeks review by [resolution filed] voice vote within 10 days of the final decision; or ,.,..::.. Section 2: That this ordinance shall be effective on and after that 31st. d after its passage by the Council, and approval by the Mayor. PASSED: By vote of all Council members: present after being read by number and title only, this ''�h day. of _ 1986 c woe 4 oreen R. Wilson, `.Deputy ;eacorder a, tu da of ..a.,, 1986. '_. APPROVED: This �� � y . Cook, Mayor EAN:sb/dj43 ORDINANCE NO. 86.- Page 1 ,+, ^et• as }r r7l R.,..yr ."w}G\."yt e5 t}J',aeR�S''a"nt)r'a;i}r. ^.^ TIGARD CITY COUNCIL e '. REGULAR MEETING MINUTES a JULY .28 1986 . 7:00 P.M. . 1y ROLL, CALL: Present: Mayor John Cook; Councilors: Tom Brian; Carolyn Eadan, Jerry Edwards, and Valerie Johnson; City Staff: Bob a. Jean, City Administrator; David; C. ' Lehr, .Chief of Police; Bill Monahan, Community Development Director; Steve Crew, Legal Counsel; and Loreen Wilson, Acting City Recorder; Randy We°16Y, City Engineer°. z. . 2. CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON-AGENDA ITUAS a. City Administrator requested the following items be considered under ton-Agenda Items ,. .1 Jack Park Options .2: American Legion OLCC Application .3 Cotswold Subdivision Bond Release .4 Public Information Announcements b. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Johnson to amend agenda as requested. x o- ..: 3. VISITOR e S AGENDA - No one appeared to sk 4111i�zr1. ' K ^' • .Y1;. 4. PUBLIC HEARING .:,:iP',R.,7.}SST x. s' ,`..I••r L M, �,•i; W•i§ya,ep. {^ y { tN tk,+ 8 2•Y'r'g9 } •'':t Prvi•''. � , PROCESS : .._. A request by the City of Tigard to amend Section 18.32.310 (a) and (b)' of the Tigard Municipal Code deleting the requirement that the Council or Planning Commission call up for review decisions made by other° Approval Authorities by resolution. This amendment would allow the Council or Commission to call up for review decisions made by other { Approval Authorities by motion only. 3+ a. Public Hearing Opened r b. Community Development Director stated this amendment would allow the Council or Planning Commission to call up for review decisions made by other A pproval Authorities by motion instead nsteac 0$• resolution. Dm c. Public Testimony: No one appeared to speak. ,' ao d. Community Development Director recommended approval.. e. Public Hearing Closed 114 f. ORDINANCE NO 86-38 AN .ti!, a •4"! NDIi C SECTION 18.32.310 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE ' '' r.t" , g. Motion by Councillor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Brian to adopt. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Page 1 COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 20, 196 �.' � vy s/f(174.0) CITY :CF TIGARD OREGON .. .,.L5 COU?ICIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY r AGENDA OF ���L 28 l 9a§ AGENDA ITEM #, , DATE SUBMITTED _21.1.1.1_1.4t.._1285 PREVIOUS ACTION: None a 3 :. ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: � r : ...-.x k :. ofw. aYa-----. , Amendment to Section 18.32.31 D PREPARED BY Elizabeth Newt `' REQUESTED BY Elizabeth 'Newton DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:WA POLICY ISSUE °? - Should the City Council amend the Community Development Code to allow the • • ° Council or Planning Commission to call up for review any decision made by ' another a.. p�aroval authority by motion. . _, INFORMATION SUMMARY. Currently Section 18.32.310(a)(2) and 18.32.310(b)(2) _ requires the city - Council or Planning Commission to adopt a resolution' to call up for review any decision made by another Approval Authority. The resolution must be .adopted within •the ten day appeal period setforth on the decision. This requirement ,, poses problems should the Council or Commission wish to call up a decision for . review at a public meeting if a resolution has not been prepared'. Staff believes that this situation can be improved by amending the Code to allow the . City Council and Planning Commission to call up for review any decision made a , by another Approval Authority by motion. Staff recommended to the Planning Commission at their July 3, 186 meeting l:. ; that' Section 18.32.310 be amended to allow the City Council and- Planning 3'. Commission to call decisions made by other Approval. Authorities up for' review , '. by motion. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward staff°s recommendation to the Council. An ordinance is attached which if 'approved would adopt the modifications as recommended by the Planning Commission. • : ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 4' 1. Approve the attached ordinance adopting the Planning , Commission`sf recommendation to modify Section 18.32.310 of the Community Development. OM Code, W 2. Do not approve the attached ordinance SUGGESTED ACTION 4 Approve the attached orditaance adopting the " Planning Commission°s recommendation to modify Section 18.32.310 of the Comrwcanity Development Coda.,.: EAN:sb/d)4 .. s .�_ ; ..;`a ;• ..'.., ' °' - ,L 1,1 *.' ', '' ' -''' - -1........-- �; �'' if _ l' ' rt . CITY' OF T]CGARD,' .CREW ;ti , ORDINANCE "NO. 86- • • .. aoier.M -FI/ a' , - x, u ri t � AYE ORDINANCE E AMENDING SC'CTXON '10,3g'.310 'Or` THE:1' C`ARD 1 NIC tP$4 COP ' A, , tit J rr+rrr++yksSruwrNSrMUw �IriNr r ,iorW+�,e.ww.M— 1 , �.. it 'WHEREAS, Section ..18,32 .310 of the Community D ve ,opanent Code' allows the City :.a . Council s and Plana rtg Ciocnmi s s xbn, an its own frrot on, a to ��xr any lanti' :use action a ,� ; n �spo^at�ed, by 'another .approvak acrthc�rity bar .4� re!olt�tuo�'.','fs lid within 10 days Esf the publication of the notice; and 1 A �5 i•-.' WHERE 1S the rPesolution reguir•ement -poses pr^obi,etss tf .a' resolution has' not . been prepared in advance,. and WHERF.AS, the Planning staff. has recommended to the Planning or►a niss on that :. .,: the motion for -review by Counci'. or Planning Commis ion be approvable by, voice vote, and '' -:- . .':;- t4 EREAS, the Planning Commission .reviewed staff's recommendation at{ a public,4 N ; hearing on July 8, 1986 and voted unanimously to recommend to City Council. i. that. Section 18'.32.310 of the Community Development Code be amended, an , ° On July 8, 1986 the City. Council held a Public hearing to consider the "- Planning.Commission°s r^ecomrrrendation. . 1::::.:''':- .7' Ti-1E; CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS Section 1: Section 18.32.810 of the Tigard Municipal Code hall be. amended as ". follows. Language to be added is urrde1,lii.ned, ^ Language to be deleted is shown in [brackets]. ' (a)(2) The Commission or Council, on its own of .on, seeks to hear a the matter by Ca resolution filed3 within n' 10 `A days of the purt)lcation of the notice as provided by .: 18.32.240(a). ::::-: (2) The Council, or^ Commission, on its own motion, seeks review by [resolution filed] voice vote tnithin 10 days of the 1 final decision; or S Section '2: That this ordinance shall be effective on and after the 31st day after its passage by the Council, and approval by the flayor !. PASSED; By vote of all Council members present after° a being read by number and title only, this _ °day;. .. of 19.86, it Loreen R. Wilson, Deputy Rocc►rder APPROVED: This day 1986. . Sohn E. Cook,;76layor EPN:sb, d j 43 �, '=. � c R ORDINANCE EEO. 86-» `„ 3: Page 1 ' o d X NA d�� :,+1 3" ,,,,,• t V'r t �:I ei t r {• a y., � et ti.on` for review p rid, �.n �b�aipeat inq the l.en�th of the r (b) • t haR�``be M1�az.�Aude�d� �r� , . -� day that noti:Ce .of the declsi.on 'l 1 flailed ,.. a` • �` ail l� be .xrt�l.a�ded = the last day for filing the petiition. or .ret iew :sh i ,,. for the �i,t o`r• arh. II .t- unless the last day falls on a legal hot%daty' fo y a Saturday. sin which case, the .lash day sh$1 bex..'the' rrtsx:�. - bus tress day • .) ".,- • ,. ` the �►ppe�l :`pera®c3. aaYa •.� (c) The Director may grant art ,extertsic►n of .. Director°$ deci:s ion for a .reasonable,: tiorae only &f s"c:que*.sled bY •- ' the applicant Arad .rs the conflation where roe c►ppeal tads beeff$ ' &" field to that date, ,:a 18...32'.310 Dec as ions which +� be gppeaked or Rev xe teei �; �- �... the Die^ee:ta�r made pursuarat" to. :3e�e,:tior1 ,: _ •_ (a) Any decision by 2 090 y appealed to the appropriate. apprcavice1 a� 9.8.3 . (a) ilia bo? apps - reay.�i ; . authority as provided in Section 18. 32.110 2.110 , the app. I authority's :deci,sio r shall be i`icral . An appeal sV''1.1 be taken • m1• by Appeal as pr rrv'j�.ded by . 18 , J'''' : of :a 9�c��.�.ce t� Rpp.• f i) �"h� f i.l i nq s• �,��' .lase • � Q•''' by any person entitled to nottcoa under 18.32. 120 .,,' ‘"\l'1:. . y Within 10 days - decision by tlhe close of City bus$.ness. da.y .. • i�lS�3tps�r eS� after notice of the decision is publ�s�2d4 irr a ne = ,. general circulation as provided by ,18.32.120(4)., 2 The Commissiowrl or C unct'l.,;; on its own .;motion, seeks to hc2, r ( ) the matter by a resolution filed within 14 days of the publication of the notice as provided by 18.32.240(a). ,: r•oval Rao ;�aar•i l.y under ,:C±c t i on • (b) Rn,y dec i s iun made by any other• App i.e� ed byr a Counr:i 1 by: 18.`32.0,10(b) or (c) may be rev ,. r did by J U d V { (1) The fi1i.ng of a No•ti,ce of Review as psrov.i `, tty any party to the decision by the cl:bse of d;ity, busarrc!ss , day within 10 days of the sendi.nq of the riot a.ce of f ertcd day decision as provided by; or �. � .•.. .(2) ,' • • • E/_ 'ht. C��unc i.l. or Commissic,r'r arr i:t.w ®wc� ttoa�l.i.tsri seeks r ee�RI:'�s by resolutiuf ftl.ebd within 1.0 days of mailed notice 0f t, e itt. y final. deci.si.ott; or : CO (3) idE�ferr�al. f'f + IIrIt:te r• ur der Section 18.'32.090(d) by t.l•ae• {. in,i t.ial 1 e%ar•inejs body to the t rna:urec i l, upon 4�l.ossurtc. u f the . a rese nts a pe; l.i c'y i.ssu�� w4r .c• tr. CD hearing, when the c a: c. p ' ,> requires Coaanril' daaliber'atia:orr and deter•I �rtdtLon, ire wh �• .h case the Council 'shall. decide:the appl.i c:at:i.cart. Ui . p r �:;dd C�0#IC�4� . R;: . . (c) Failur•ca to File an appeal or petikiure for re_vi:e't4 shall bc. a failure to exhaust adnti.nistrat.ive re°orred a:es• it i.s; the •peur''po se o�f this s s suet:i+err to provide the r3art.tes nvc:r-y r•eerroc'eiy p"sx'►,ab'i4•� The filing o f an ; ppeal ors pet t iUr1 ``rot', r•ev i41w '1 . o,11 1 t.1.ore prer..edent to 11.ttgattart. , l e 1:II 5 rt'S',, • TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR METING -- JULY S, 1986 1. President Moen called the meeting to order at 7:35 PM. The meeting was held at that Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall Room - 13125 SW Hall Blvd. '.. Tigard, Oregon.` 2 ROLL CALL: PRESENT. President Moen; Commissioners Owens, Butler, Pyre, Peterson, Vanderwood %nd Newton. ABSENT: Commissioners Will Newman and Deane Leverett ,, STAFF: Senior Planner Keith Liden; Assistant Planner• • Deborah Stuart; Secretary Diane Jelderks. e. , 3, APPROVAL OF MINUTES 4 ,... Commissioner Owens moved and Commissioner Peterson seconded to approve the minutes as submitted. Motion carried by majority of Commissioners present, Commissioner Newton abstained. ; 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION 0 senior Planner Liden stated that Albert and Virginia Misterek, Agenda Item 5.8 (Subdivision S 14-86/Lot Line Adj . Pl 16-86/Variance V 13-86) had requested their item be set over to the August Hearing. President Moen moved and Commissioner Owens seconded to set Agenda Item .. 5.8 over to the August Planning Commission Hearing. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. o Larry Conrad, Senior Planner, City of Beaverton did a half-hour presentation on the Urban Services Study. o Commissioner Sutler stated that he had written a letter, as a private citizen, to the Boundary Commission regarding the Metzger Annexation; >; 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 REVIEW APPLICATIONS FOR APPOINTMENT TO NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS. Applications were reviewed for Patricia Taylor Cantrell for membership in ; Y NPO # 2 (presently combined with NPO # 1) and for Daniel R. Gott for membership in NPO #, 1. Patricia Cantrell was unable to attend the e' meeting. Daniel Gott waa.3 present and stated he had been attending NPO Al l's meetings and was concerned with changes being made in the neighborhood .' and wanted to be involved in the process. * Commissioner Owens moved and Commissioner Sutler seconded to forward the applications to City Council with a recommendation for appointleent. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present, PLANNING' COMMISSION:;M NUTES' .'Jul'`9,. 1996 'Pagel*, 1 e 1 �< • • f � ° °o Wes Larson, agent/co-applicant with the owner supported the proposal property could be developed to 4.5 units per acres, however, they were t only requesting 2 additional lots. He reviewed the difficulty with the drive and felt that there would be sufficient buffering because of the natural buffer that exists between the abutting .residents and the proposed private drive. } o Larry Fellows, 12200 SW 16th, opposed the partition. He did not feel' the y. report ' was clear as to which is the larger lot, what the width of the ,r - street would be and how the condition for protection of the trees would be ,q- met. - _ REBUT'T'AL 0 Ralph Wise, stated that they were sensitive to the neighbors concerns. He •'�,., felt that since the driveway is private and not public there shouldn't been that much of an increase in noise. He was concerned about moving the driveway because it would limit the use of the land. " • PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED • o Discussion followed regarding wetlands, the possibility of getting": additional land from abutting property owners for the driveway; adequate buffering/setbacks, established area property owners rights and developing . property owner rights, and meeting requirements of section 18.162.050 requiring screening. • `` o Commissioner Moen moved and Commissioner Peterson seconded to uphold the Director Decision for MLP 2-86, modifying condition number 7. for easement width west to lot 3 and south along lot 600 be 35 feet. Add a condition which requires that Section 18.162.050 be met. Also, directed staff to prepare the final order and for President Moen to sign off on that final order. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. RECESS 10:25 ' : . President Moen left, Vice President Owens chaired the meeting. RECONVENE 10:40 PM 5.4 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZCA 3-86 CITY or TIGARD - '. Request to amend section 18.32.310 (a) and (b) of the Tigard Municipal a Code deleting the requirement that the Council or Planning Commission call up for review decision made by other Approval Authorities by resolution. 't , This amendment would allow the Council or Commission to call up for review. decision made by other Approval Authorities by motion only. Senior Planner Liden reviewed the processes and requested the Commission t,+: OM ` forward the proposal to City Council with a recommendation for approval,, PUBLIC TESTIMONY o No one appeared to speak b . PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Commissioner Fyre moved and Commissioner Newton seconded to fortoJard ZOA-3-86 to City Council with a recommendation for' approval . Motign carried: unanimously by Commissioners present. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ' July 8, 1986 Page 4 :. 4 . ri- i•. , I\ C'' Gr a.. „ r �amyr.�+ 'a.ts�amwwFiar.ara^eu•-anea°re^•�..a....,«r ...... ,.4.c-let'."d!x'^ir.t ir-w.`as,,,,i,,i''i.m TIMES 'PU LISHI - O 1 A Y , k P O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684 038. Not k4' � - BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 ': . a ' Legal;Notice.Advert!sheag J City of Ti• gard s!, • • 0 Te$r8heet'Notice, P. O Box 23397 : 0 Tigard, OR 97223 0 [1 Duplicate Affidavit ,: AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION - 1'.:.' , > `r�'.1'�fy1�'ryf+T"h 'kti v, ,�bt4 i! {.Z�1[iz e , j.... )•i,.fi .w!„.1f,4 V Y':4,itk,Zx f 4 1.r "•,.i,• - .a,i' ::J i STATE OF OREGON 1 s , i} n L,r ➢ � V .. q ' ��. ,, .� Y”4 S�r'�'�p`��-�-o�7a �J �c.�r t +u ,°� t . COUNTY OF WASHINGTON ) .i ic... t ,4.y" V vN, _� s r.1, '',�.Y, MF,, ..-`: I Steph.anle .'euba.uer '_ being.firsts duo sworn depose and say that I am the Advertising l = .-a# » ,,,. , . Y P Time p e . : ,,. + 1�..FxF�r.S' �S �r — � wt `,�� 1f � �, l ilVta�� �t��f��-t alma Director,or F:Ls principal clerk of the .1 rr t;� F ,L i. a newspaper of general circulation as defined III ORS, 19x3.010 •�' 4 • `° \ r ' ,`,`�-' t t aP"taw,,,r,, F and 193.020; published at 21g d. in the '' �`''; �i- L ;} .t#�I }F,- ' ,3<, ,r-;1 JrPa .k 9 r�`Cy�, •� t! * s� • . are aforesaid county and stater that the "j �, � �y : _ � t; ' -; :' _Pub1 i ( Hea3t'i g 1,Ce t4:'.. ,-.iL* .,,^d�" :1•r-y f;"\' V ''' S. a.. �ja4�.*`�Y�j as���t''t��4�,wf'{• R�>,"ka�,its a printed copy of which is hereto annexed,was published in the ,, {' s0'� �„,M�w Y�s ;., Y aw, r y {'.1.-f;',,r i' h„3 d,d'TPYE4 7iP 6„' 41,, S.y g' dpTitire issue of said neevspaper for_ 1 �succees5ve and - -= f +, r➢tirL'> ° }d., 4£ rt.orasecutive in the following issues: ' • , '...-1`;','.;',‘4.(1';',71,.''"-:,-':',./,, �" "c: : r ” �r .g�?(,•Ii`r'"t ♦ yyyy' �.'y 4 ;;-'r �.° °. L ,` g:',,-'-<'`."�'8 6 ;i LL`��trf jy �i5? 'r;."�`y k jrt\t-�ra i y+, x f . x t/ rr L ix -s. > '�t.�a) 4a F 3°3"t r -'~ F , ! k xr s'l� :;/?,t i r a�,k'•`�' .t-,y� ,4. 4 to f7 �i r ya g; _-, ,1 ^#4:'i , , t2- `:,' fs` i.4 t 1.'1';Ti,4 -:0i r 7 5' ,...4• :, / .. o,�•ca r a y a4 a� }. t F 4 ; ,+.._4 � „^y=ti�hlt`t`;�3., '1}'`�''' //j' ///(�� J t.�`` ��L rti"lf a�,fr>�,tt���t,'• Mt,Y�'. ➢�'�,j_' ;,��'�� i"`. t''-."'° „... i .i/ i igs .....t ../4$111./< /,` ':, ''+,\' '+ 5,,.. g:li,:,,, .''-,7+i 4 La,: ~y �' �fz�uij � :�f� j ltivs„i '�i I''l��) a� �"*E� ��N� �&S rr, .N' 3c• tea C.:a F ' ti a+} 1 Py,y Y ',Yitjz&li ''' 1U�t-§y4 '' 1 ?frl ✓� } 'Y ': .?, ft:', -.'.3"t L '�} ! s r.. '.R'',.:. ii h _., n z 1r before me.thts ri \, ,:t:4-47,.-ti j.�,S- �, p• ri+-' ' X+x y'.iA'w ,h .f:i f.4�$y } r ,`,.'t +,rRi;i r•`rvst" I y{ !:E"• !➢� :'4. _ �' - �k�r, d'�''$ F;` s�\. '4'''''' ., P..• e a4.,. 1.1-` 1 Z�\tr.dt' It il'1S"tl. �lV.N.f'� ':' '��-> lfb•'�° '.44''''';'''''''' ''�j► . � .j:s.,�/ `.,.,�4 �,�* 'N i'SAya yT a�i• �,�'+ Z v '"'v U) ri, > 1",tary Public for Oregon.' .{;`,',.R 4 fi, +1TMt ; ;��r�?� rtt, 4�g'.„,,,.'., My Commission Expires: 9/2 0/$8. :;yt.,u{;'. ' i,1),,,Z';.,..'.t,° _��� �' _ � a • , �/ ..e lae� g k f tW. 'i '1..i' `t' 3aL v* °>� ^t�" 1 .e.. .1 t{ ' AFFIDAVIT -'- ,-, - '�"-.�.. 4 \� a m � 5,, • j • Via' , ., , ., . .. . ,. ,.., ., ,‘,.,• :,,,, .'.i.,.,,•00'.. ., . ; •,.,.,,,,.., .,, , 0 , ,.,., :, ,.:•,,.,.., ,,„, ,_ ...,:,.,,, ,:. ..:'''':''''''. ' '''''''' l' ' .''' . .' ' ' ' ; * ' ' ' ' .'a..4. AGENDA 3 TEM MEMRANDU CI:nY' or',TICARO., 9R GO.$ e, f ' . S TO dune 6°d '1906 • `r' P"lanroing Com�isson. . P FROMl Planning-Staff SUS �C`9': Amendment to Section 18. 2:310 (�OAr 3.86)' ::-•'''';'::.-..':-1:'''''-.'.'. : '.-, ,' Currently Section 19.32.310 (a) (2) and 18'32.310 (b)' (2) require .the' C�:t �' } Count.1 or Pl,anra1ng Commissi.Of to adept a resolution to ca11 ,LIP for• review..ary. I.,:: , decision made by another Approval Authority• The resolutio must be adopted :.4.:., r within the terr. day appeal period setfor•th on the decision. This reequlrement• „:.....-,,,-.-! oses° roblems should the Council orr .Commission wi' hto call up a decision for review at a. public meeting i'f a resolution has. not been prepar•ed. Staff . ...''''.-1'...'-:-'" believes that this situation can be impro ed'' by `anendirlg the Code to allow the. . . City ,Council and Planning Commission to call up for review any decision male .-t...., ,:"... . by another Approval Authority by motion. STAFF RECOMMENDATION �' . :' : Staff recommends that the Planning commission. for ar l a recommendation to City '::.'„ ''''....:--i..";'''''. Councal that Section 18 32.310 be amended to allow the City Council and • , . „.•:,, Planning Commission to call decisions made by other i'�pproval Authorities up A. for review by motion. : Y� 2612P dmj 386) ,, , , , ,,,, ,,,, , , , ,,,,,,, .i,, ,,,._i,_.,,,,:::::,,,,_,,_,, ,,,,,,_,,,,,,,:,,,,::::::,n,,,,-,,,,,.-.',..,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,,,,—,... ;Q PLANNING c� ISSIO Jul a (Z006 A S• 1 f 4 1:, i. , • a . • lb the length of. the petit3::)f for ,.r•eitew, period; the (b� l:n ��>nnp�tir.c� day -'that notice of the .decision is .aillod. shall be el►tclude the last' day for filhng the potation or 's°eview .shal:l. be included artless the last day falls on .a 10kgal holiday for the City or a3sn. a Saturday in which case, the last day sh l.i be , the nett' business day. c) The Director rooay grant an extension of the appeal period. •urn {. 'Director°s decigon for a reasonable time only if requestc_d. bit the applicant and in the ccndi,tion. where no appeal, has keen: field to that date. 19.32..310 Decisions which ma be A..ealed or keviewed. Any deci.si(3n by the Director made pursuant to Sep:tion qr'; riat:e a r•oruaY�. be appealed to the •approp pp. 18.32.090(a) nay authority as provided in Section 18.32. /10. 1.10 end the �:�ppr'oval. '- - eel. ;aH�al.1 be taken .:. authority's decisidro shall. be final. An app by Appeal as provided by 19,32.340 32.340 (1) The filing of 'a I�oti.c to AF�p by any person entitled to notice. under 18.3.2.120 of the .. y day within I() d'+ys close of Cray_. business d�c i s ion by the c to after 'notice of the decision, is' published in a newspaper of geroer°al circulatiool as provided by 18-32-120(;0 . (2) The Coilomission or Council, o�r'o its own motion, seeks t.o ha`*r the matter by a resolution `filed withir-1 10 dav,s of tree publ.icativn of the notice as provided by 19.32.240(x). (b) Any decision made by any other Approval Authority under Sec t Toro 18.32.090(b) or (c) ma y ` ) be reviewed by the Council by ° (a) 1"he fi1i.rlg of a Notice of Review, as provided by ].9. 2 3 .340 pay any party to the decision by the clasp of city bzas�nc�s day within 10 days of the sendirect of the notice of final decision as prov id by, or '- 2 The Council or Cnmloli,s Toro, on its own snot i.on, stpks rev s.Ca4� by resolu.littOsn ft1yd, within 10 days of mailed notice oL final. decisicon; or by, t tic* �> Ce • (3) RE�fcrral. of a rncttte€^ under Sc•cti.on l.t�.31 o90(r ) ini tial hcaarinljs body to the (;r)carici.l., upon closure of th hearing, when the case pr•eSersts a pr.,l i.cy 3,3S c� w�oi c.�o .1 ; . rcega.oir'es Council del,i.beraon anti cieter•ininati.a,one xri wh. h B° case the Council shall. decide the apr>1;3 r:ad ion, WU blti<' $!E'�tfil'd� cal or petition for rebti.(,w shalk , (c) Failure to file an app !P a failure to ettha�u st adi�i.rt :stmt ive rer+tediccs ].t is the a.i)u io C To he tilts sect ion to provide the parties over•,Y r ec.ilody R s , The filing of an appeal. or petition''for* r ev ie�>., i s c fired a .110c1:1:` • • pr'e..cettient to litigation v ,a a s a _ fry r _ • • 3 . ° " ,/ :t *FICE•U5E ONLY . ' NOTICE OF PROPOSED ACTION . LCOC FILE it TO: DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSF YATION & DCYELCPMEN11 117S Court Street N.E. Salem, Oregon 97310-0590 Action: (Check all that apply Comprehensive Land Use New Land Use ' r-: P1 an Amendment 3CX Regu1 a ,i oft Amendment Regal at#caa ± DATE JUNE 3, 1983 FROM: CITY OF TIGARD•.. . City or Courtty, LOCAL FLT 18 ZOA 3-56 DATE SET FOR FINAL HEARING ON ADOPTION: July 28 1986 (Note: Notice must be received in Salem at eas days pr':�r � �e final hearing. This dlte must be provided when filed at OLCD because provisions for comments are tied to the date of final hearing). )': TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING: 7:.00 Tigard Town Hall Room 13125 SW' :a13. Blvd. Ti ar R` 97223 ., (1 ) SUCfi1ARY AND PURPOSE OF PROPOSE ACTION: A request by the City of Tigard to amend Section 18.32.310 (a) .,and (b) of the. 'Tigard Municipal Code deleting the requirement that the Council or Planning . Commission call up for review decisions made by other Approval Authorities by ,a resolution. This amendment would allow the Council ?r Commission to call up ' A • for review decisions made by other Approval Authorities by motion only • O. a. Size of Affected Area. City-Wide to b. Location of Affected Area: i.e (2) List Statewide Goal s which may aooi y to the proposal: (3) List any state or federal aoenci es, 1 o over°1ent o2r 1®c42s ci a1 semi ce z tri cs w interested in or i ,n. : Flizabeta Newton 503°-639-9171 } Oi rec,. guesti®ns_end comments tca � � �Phaa�e�, ':. Address: 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, ©R 97223 ,N/ t ' f d L!' � 1 I G R0'6� A d 1-7 • t , 62063/980 . ry ♦ r s , . .u .4. '' ' arv'OF • ' • .,- .41" • , .. -. Nwfaispiowt204Gaiamt ONJOC*4 , - COMPREHENSIVE]?A,N AMENDMENT/ZONE CHAINGE/ZODIE ORDINANCE AMEIIDFIENT APPLICATION C a ,_.,r CITY OF TIGAR t, _ PO. Box 23397 - • Tigard, Oregon 117223 - (503) 63S-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. . c3--ac - RECEIPT NO O! ' APPLICATION ACCEPTED RY: i DACE a 1 l i ...�,f . i 1. GENERAL, INFORMATION A.pp1lcatlon ele,,ents submitted: 4 ': PROPERTY ADDTtESS/LOCATION /)/(J1'. kJ 04/, ' / ' (A) App hcatt ion , orm (1) (B) Owner's signature/written ., - TAX NAP ARD TAX LOT NO /# :U AL/(I./ authorizat;loit (C) Applicant's statement SITE SIZE (15 copses) PROPERTY OWDIER/DEED :-IOLDER* j,�✓ g . 1 . .1.c :�� (D) Flan fee ( ) ' ADDRESS *HONE Additional information for Compre-- „... CITY ZIP sine Plan Map endraernts/Zone Changes - z,• ,--..- 1 PPF.,ICANT* 4 .! /1 ',! ,�1/1A. (E) Meaps. indicating property ADDRESS` 1. / A ./_PHONE ' ' ' location (15 copi(?..$) } CITY Z('4 4 / ,40 71 it 0 ZIP L (F) List of property owners and , *When t I` owne and r41,.- applicant are different addresses within 250 feet (1) •^ the applicant must be the purchaser of record � (G) Assessor's Map (1) people, pP 1' • b: or a leasee in possession with written authorization .__., (H) Title transfer instrument (1) :. • from the owner or an agent of the owner with written '- • authorization. The owner(s) must sign this ' , application in the space provided on page two or on. DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: IX, ap lic submit a written authorization with this application. I CO . 2. PROPOSAL SUMMAR7l -I The owners of record of the subject property FINAL DECISION DEADLINE:: al request a Comprehensive a Plan Amendment (if COMP. Pi. /ZONE DESIGNATION: .• 0 applicable) from r to a DJ and a Zone Change from to wil N.P.O. Number: OR . The applicant requests an amendment to the Planning Commission Approval Date: following sections of the Comprehensive Plata or Community Develop ent Code sy ''. I '. 2- . 0 / S City Council Approval Date • .. (KSL.pm/0737P) :* 9 r i y 9 e�ari�nce , cor+ditiona�. uses,. or other land use :a- ctions; to be considered ,,, 3 List any ;, , l3 as Past.of this kFp • k F ou €dill :i�eed:to submit eittachme�its ,: Appli'can'ts.. 7o: have a complete iu p1icati®n Y 4�" , App � °' attached inf orwation sheet. at the time you submit;' this �. d�scrtbed in the ,z q`', application. , . ' 5 THE APPLICt 3TfcS), SHALL CERTIFY THAT. 1 t does not violate` an deed restrictions that ma be o ; . Ad. The ,above ra�ues attaches to, or im osed u.on the sub ect ,ro,eft . " ranted, the applicant will exercise the rig " ,,application is g •: E e �� the ,;app �,e with the terms and subject to all the conditions and. granted in aecorda�n, ". approval. �`4 limitations of the app :•.." . statements irr. , C. All of the.. above $tatemerts and the �. exhibits transmitted herewith, are true, and the attachments, and permit issued, based on this - applicants . so acicnc�'�leage that any P such statements are application, may be revoked if it is found.. that and .1 �x false. application, including -. . :: D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the app luding the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for app policies Y �� or denying the application. DATED this day of SIGNATURES of each owner (eg husband and rife) of the subject property• r --,,, ,../.."-- d .... 'iii a 141t.[.I i itibli -, -' . _ .. . .. . ... y:• .fin.: O • o ® `Y (KSL:pm/07 7P) , a S? .. y' ..> s .n . .'Y-. Via"v. . z a. { „' -,•, .. x' af`i � J . . •1 ... ,- ♦. t .Fea;i • p•• e APPLICATION INFORMATION' COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/ZONE CHANGE/ZONE` ORDINANCE AMENDMENT PART I REVIEW PROCESS ., A,. Comprehensive Plan.:Amendment .. 1. Text Change This applies to amendments to the text,. and policies contained' , within the "Tigard. Comprehensive Plan -*..- Findings•: Policies, and Implementation Strategies, Volume Z°` or 1-.'Tigard-'Comprehensive,„ Plan REsource Document Volume .1 . 2 Map Change This relates to amendments made. to the land. use designations which appear on the adopted Comprehensive` Plan Map. This ,type of ,, .` Plan amendment is often made in conjunction with a Zone Change` •which is described below, ; • B. Zone Ordinance Modifications • 1. Zone Ordinance Amendment Changes in the requirements of the Community Development Code are :�° considered as Zone Ordinance A,mendoents. The3e modif.ications are ,.1 typically initiated by the Planning corilmisti100 or City Council but the general public may also propose changes to the Code. 2. Zone Change This applies to amendments made to the,' zoning designations which appear on the adopted Zoning District`Map. If the proposed Zone- A.; Change is not consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan Designation, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment must be reviewed ' ' - simultaneously. C. The application and review process involves the following steps 1. Preapplication Conference • Prior to submission of a Comprehensive', Plan', Amendment,- Zone ange, or Zone Ordinance Amendment, the applicant ,angst make an; appointment with the Planning `Staff to discuss the proposal as it relates to the applicable requirements. 2. Public .Hearing before Planning Commis-s ,on Comprehensive Plan Amendments to toe text ` or� snap; `.and . Zone; • Ordinance Amendments will be reviewed by the -Commission and a recommendation shall be forwarded to the': City Couric:Li' action. Zone Changes will. • be, approved o:r . denied b Commission based upon the applicable criteria. ( t Ch**" + d 1111 111 1 e 3. Public Hearing before City Counri l y. • The City Council shall review the Planning Commission recommendations for Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Zone Ordinance_ Amendments and will .approve or deny the proposal based' upon the applicable criteria. In the case of a Comprehensive' Plan Amendment and a Zone Change being reviewed concurrently, a zone district approved by the Planning ' Commission shall become effective following City Council approval of the Comprehensive Plant Amendment D Following approval, the change will be implemented by the City :.. PART 11 -- APPROVAL CRITERIA A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment (text change) + _ 1. Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines 2. Consistency with other Plan policies B Comprehensive Plan Amendment (map change) 1. Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines . 2. Consistency with other Plan policies • t-, 3. Locational Criteria in Chapter 12 of the Plans Volume 2 C. Zone Ordinance Amendment (Community Development Code,) 1. Comprehensive Plan policies 1. 2. Consistency with other provisions of the Community Development z . Code • D. Zone Change (Map Change) 1. Comprehensive Plan policies CC 2. Locational Criteria in Chapter 12 of the Plan, Volume 2 3. Consistency with other provisions of the Community.'Development Code g� E. Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines 'e State law requires that local land use plans be consistent with the Statewide Planning Goals and. Guidelines. The Goals that are relevant` to the City are listed and briefly described below 1. Goal #1: De�vel,op a citizen involvement program that ensures the • opportunity for citizens to get involved in all aspects of 'the planning process; (2) { • e'+',?r 4 r . s♦. '"�' .1�'v't ,.• 2. Goad #2. tablish a land use plannin g process and policy • 4'. t framework as the basis of all. land use decisions and actions:, and ensure an adequate factual data base to-" subs"tartiLiate those decisions and actions; 3 Goal #3 Preserve and maintain agricultural •lands beyond the •-•,. e -- Urban Growth Boundary of the community; ' ' 4. Goal #4: Conserver forest lands, not committed for" urban uses, for strictly forest uses; 5. Goal #5: Conserve open space and protect nat"ral and, scenic - �: resources; 6 Goal #6 Maintain and improve the quality of air, water and land resources; • 7 Goal ##7: Protect the lives of community residents and property from natural hazard ar cies; a. Goal #8: Meet the recreational needs of residents, of the community, 'State, and visitors' 9 Goal #9 Diversify and improve the economy of the community and d' the State; e. 10. Goal #10: Provide adequate housing for the needs of the community, region and State; 11. Goal #11: Plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as the framework for urban development; 12, Goal ##12: Provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system; 13. Coal #13: Conserve energy; and 14. Goal #14: Provide for an orderly and efficient transition on roar urbanizable to urban land uses. Oe p�r ,a F. Comprehensive Plan Policies ;.` . r The Plan sets the policy direction related to land use and development. Different policies will apply depending upon the nature. WOO CD of a development proposals G. Lucational Criteria These criteria are contained within the Comprehensive Plana " They ' describe the locational characteristics 'that should exist in order 'to ee accommodate specific land use activities. • • 7777 7 (3) y+ r a t m �s' ° +a„c-,,wi aaan'L.�: Ji4 �T : +�- . AA +•r"" 1 i.rir +.t ,'sir r a.a� ,..c c .:. to=T r x^w : . fs � r � :T H. Determination of` ,�,pp1icab1e ',Cr Criteria , `The- Plahrnin$ Staff will -assist the. .applicant in order'. to ascertain •*_ which criteria. relate" to a particular proposal.',. Y Y . I .MISSION,.IUIR EME T f y t e .PST Y� �PLI��,TIO tor sand .rf A,.: AU. app icationS' shall made on orms provided b hen Dirc a. shall be accoiupanied bar 1. One app1icstion foss. 2. . Fifteen copies of the necessary data or „narrative which explains. y , ,ho the vroposal conforms with the applicable criteria.' . 3. The required fee. •• _.. . For Comprehensive, Plan.. map amendments and ''Zone: Ct ngesa the j -+ following additional information'shall be submitt2d,:' , a map illustrating the .o,Catioin of the•property. ,fifteen copies of p � ` ' �. • b. One list of the names and addresses of all persona who are propert} owners of record within' ,250 feet of; the property involved. '''':"*......1 c. One Assessor`s map' of the property. . ��.- d. One copy of the title transfer instrument (eg., deed). , ' `; - (KSL:bs/0755P) I _ ' r .. ,S_' { } c . W d (4) i ' 'JJ 1 � ., 2 r d_ # F•1}`Y l Y