Loading...
ZOA3-76 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. �Ji"1&+y ,44Yi d3Tr 'tiF�3 Yi � ,,.a,.....�.,.i��.r.§.�.s,..;,.:ia :�. _ J -.adw >n �:'� 1 w�:'z h .a«m��a,,..•-..w:�•` x.r.,... �.rn aa�s^.,. .• , -',dq,.s•1..,...x,.,::m:.?..•.,e...ri�,nw-,..»ee._ .. i 'r.sh«of ap iY•. ....:.,_,wk?w..vst. .a..,,,,•,r...«a�•,..,m.-n ... ,�, ^f s w L;3 i di'r'e''' "k t>Md +,< Y fk irsy, "1 t,1 ri3�•j�9.Ak .°,.'.^S#. 1sRy.{.? 1� a[x.,Y.� REQUEST ro AMEND TITLE 18, S. 18.58.050 LANDSCAPING SECURITY DEPOSITY DENIED 4/6/76 7 � "iR.y aF.` - ,'i-�'q�t Y ra:t.. �{e..p..,!l5...�o•.:fif,,r,rt;,5>2,.�f+,. .43.�k,ai•7 f:C,.+.tl.tt"�9.J 7. :i5 .r.,x f� Zone Ordinance Amendment (ZOA 3-76) . t"yf rt+{ mt' Yut, e + r r 1i a� l��+ r fir: 1�4n rSx 4.Y4t bYr#f'`• s i?; ;t•G� aWD zv' f<� avr �.i rf 4r,4i, ia�ay iry 1+{r J`. _._._ .. - .,.. .....: ,:.. d `{s.3r! c Jx •,-+ �a,r..:�r, ,{, .�!t5.d tt.�` f�.f tom+.�:::�. x#':uNfs" to $.:dx't 'vyi:...'. .Sh. +l§p..» _. _ ._.. :..„ -fir ., .:: ,t.t..• .. , '�. .. .0 ..:. „S.. .<< �a.-.i+` _4,. r...f t �..,r.. �..,. t. :j'. s.. ..d... .,. . _ .. .: ,. :.. ., >,.r ..ex r r..z e v,.. .... Y ... 1r r •.j. tiF w. .�,, f r.t f.: .. +, ':, .:.. .... ., < >,. .3 y t, y+i..n .. c,...,a.',t',.. ,. .fY. .. ..N�, ,aau. ,.. 'k� 1 M,.�..y .{..,h.=,•..4' T..zz ,y;Ty,,,. .rtiis1...•.. �:�" •��• .t r: ++ Rv.7+;f i.k:. �3l n-,64 J• �X'.r;.,x ,.r�S+° ; r r1 -,S,x�, Yp �- t r S.„.: � kt!'..d..<.a..r`..h,.� ,:..�k �„fi:.~iM,� ,.rx�fb.e ., .� .ii-,..,.ry, Y^ .p',+•Y. ' e�: �' r.v� �' - �}r,t is a vio ��'`,• .n. i s,,..�:.a..aiv r f .,;nt,. .:, rev..,J.° .-..._�,Y.:,.. 1 d_C tai^ L ��It >kT. yin.'Fc`f . 0 0P, 3.. 9 i , rf {r, 1 MINUTES ' t, ' Tigard Planning Commission j,, fiv; April 6, 1976 -- 7:30 p.m Twality Junior High School - Lecture Room ,,. 14650 SW 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon 11 ) t. 1. CALL TO ORDER Meeting called to order at 7:38: p.m. by Com- �t missioner Popp in the absence of Chairman Porter. ',,\''''' 2. ROLL CALL: Present: Moore, Nicoll, Sakata, Popp, Wakem; r staff: Bolen, Laws ,:, Excused Absence Goldbach, Porter \tf 3 a APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes s of 3/16/76 were approved as submitted. y °cl"4 F dot..,, A.,: 4. CONMUNTCATIONS: Staff informed the Commissioners of the resig- � nation of Ray Ems, effective 4/1/76, 7y "' 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS ;F' : 5.1 PRELIMINARY REVIEW ZC 2-76 (K jelgaard) , �� A request by Orland Kjelgaard for preJ,_iminary lan and pro- 1 . gram review of a proposed residential planned development 1' s< in the vicinity of 13778-13840 SW Hall Blvd. (Wash. Co. ''.t 'it tax map 2S1 2DD, tax lot 500) , , "j.s tt1r�(q (tabled from March 2 9 1976, meeting) ,4 , '' ` A Staff Report• ` ra I r,yta Bolen reiterated the reason for this matter being 1,,i tabled from the 3/2/76 meeting in order that NPO' „ . i; should have time to resolve street location questions , . in the area east of Hall Blvd• and north of Bonita Rd. $:,,r, Bolen read into the record a motion which the NPO #5 .)` had adopted at their 3/24/76 meeting with regard to ;;t4 the Kjelgaard. multi-family request. t . B. Applicant Presentation: lcs'{. 0 Win Stuckey, engineer for the proposed Planned ,,t Development, stated that he had nothing new to add y' 1 to those statements which had previously been given ,, '4 , .... in his presentation at the 3/2/76 meeting , law C. Public Testimony: e ' ���, o John Havery, Chairman of NPO #5, reiterated some of f{,� �: the findings made in the staff report and stated that '' g p I' )� � when this property and additional surrounding property 5 1._..,..,R.'4. . ........._..... °...qt... ..... em+ k..)q a,•3 u. ,..�k..,.....\ ...,.T a.,.'t rt:,....P-tY...,.MN..,R N�:h..,"...en._.K,�'`'4:..,.................,.,-t_..-.......'e.,.r.r,... t..""Y'..s..?Y.,.,.......>..`°.:..°•..,r.. ..J.Y..�a...,�.<.'� ..F"'........,....__-.-..P.........-wxw....7..:..Y L...,i�.......:.:..., .:........I.,'.A n.„;A.,,3..,.?c....t,..^3 S 4+.�5 J ti.=:..){ v 1r:...•...r`7 k4.:..�S Lr N�1..Y.. 1.•"t,i:7� t n`n nr$. i iy.. .,. ....-, F .n.ts..4 k 4.. �..i(;-..4..fr 4 et a,A Y��W,,:,[F,.,r,.�?4 i x,..�d.-'.,!1,1�7.t,?e, =.„i n..-t S .u,1.a.rti<.?,�{wf�,t f.:r r.a�r.«a«7.1#.x�.Yf.!,♦ 'r .t F ,..ry=�.4.L Sl.. ,.z,' w.\ .�iYv,� ,,xx ..C.1 4r,E tl w}1. 4 r.:i Yy1,1 �,�x X t w ix.:S d �?.{ '.,t,a,,,'r+ot-rt_l.J1 t 'n, r , . p'+,I :.. a n C,r page 2 f+t 4• PC Minutes `. u 1 kYYf I�'�}{: 4/6/76 6 ';` ' wer.e developed, other developers should be aware `1 tfr,. they to to k!1 , that they would have provide for the cost t ,�, 1, construct an additional spine road system. Val {{{ 'aY 0 Walter Durham, NPO #5, asked Mr. Stuckey the approxi-- ` mate ground floor area being proposed. `. l >lx :;{[ o Stuckey responded approximately 1/6 or 180,000 sq. ft. '' {e'r ;yiz D. Staff Recommendation: ', r Staff recommended that the Planning Commission accept , kY the application and hold a hearing to consider the zone ii 4.,,-.: . change request. , b� 4i kYap}}F ".. E Rebuttal Ik gg '''''.'t-.1 1 ', , o Stuckey stated that it was difficult to perform an £, `` adequate job on a small segment and asked that the x , a <'.; grade and alignment of the spine road be pinned C ,t y ;; down before the applicant .,s required to do so. g`i�'1�rX• ily xx a*« F. Commission Discussion and Action: - '.! � , . o Sakata asked staff`'s opinion as to the number of t units being proposed. r F ;,;.1:';` `o Bolen stated that he did not want to be critical at E i,ig this time, but was concerned as to the amount of .r { , open s ace and its arrangement as shown on the con p p ;rT , {k cept plan. t ra*Jyfaz ,;'� , o Nicole made a motion to proceed with preliminary { ,' plan review. �,,,*; o Seconded (Wakem) . k yNs t' ' o Unanimously approved. +'t �,r 5.2 ZONE CHANGE ZC 8-75 (NPO #3) -': ,' Request for approval of rezoning of lands within the *�y�rt ,1.�. �, boundaries of "NPO #3 Plan for Derry Dell-Foot' of Bull c 0- ; Mountain Area" to conform with the adopted Comprehensive r � f 4+x,1;I Plan, as amended. ',; A. Staff Report: gar ,w o Bolen stated the reasoning for the zone change r r, ?,,,t , .,; - request -- in order that the zoning be brought into '. conformance with the recently-adopted Comprehensive Q ,{, Plan (NPO #3) . l,FF , : f ''''''„:'j's''..:. t t i`s1,4 i .,.w:u...........�^:.: .,..,._.,..:. ..,.::....:.,.- ,.......,,..,._,,...,.. .•........., ,........%.;,....`._ .'.t.,.',-....,.e_.,..._#,..x...., .f.-;.,..;.;.t.......5..,.,....,...``"''".:•,.". _.._'�" "....". r"r .:,-.a:....,."{"^°'�t,¢..-.t•a•..,. .,..n..,.........: ..r....:,;.:'.. .,,...,..,;, ...._t. '''''',,',1'„,,3� n.<.,d,..��.v<,,at,i'3.a.,.....,�1 B�ir:'l"7.x i"H«a.� : 'J r.r-,*'.te`3.�'A f ,'.t t-.,4}u.r,.°"t i,°N.aa r! ..t..,.7t.',x 5 . t r n M,a¢�.0>h....i.au'f:;Y+"T. N�,,1"r.Y F f.„.,e2"tp�"4.r.a.w:,C�.3.a_ -��g . .tr X t M.a l� ,..t.W.:.. �w si oi.�SCd Y ti t J,,..s..}µS yy 7 3%.1 y re�*,..t �'�?^�k 3 x .r+'-u 5+.4 c l,:.�' �.,.�t {...n+"r. a rxs..... ,r,,, aro .,'f,_ Y E rt t;, i IL t,,),,,, page 3 PC minutes :,.,.0.!,,,, 4/6/76 i rr '1,1,1,;. .`';�' B. Public Testimony: none ;-,‘'k,.' , 7, tM1i' . C. Staff Recommendation: APPROVAL. t,p4 , ' D,s Commission Discussion and Action. a ''.,'1.','‘'.(''. _ 0 Wakem asked staff if counsel for Mr. Pollock, Lou • �' Fasano, had contacted staff regarding this matter. P b,' . 1;�'rf. 0 Bolen stated that he had talked to Mr. Fasano con- at#i` . cerning the possibilities of developing the Pollock dA3C.j, property and- that, Mr. Pollock. would. have the option y',Y,'t of developing his property under a Planned Develop- ,J„°S,'{ ment density at 4 units to the acre. ,, o Moore stated that due to the recent Supreme Court `ij rdecision re ardin g Baker v Milwaukie, that by law 3 '''''.'',*;4 we would be required to bring the zoning into con- formance with the Plan. 14 ( 0 Motion for approval (Sakata) ., l',. r '',3t;:',''''ti., o Seconded (Moore) .. r: .,t< 1r t5i- r,s7kr; o Unanimously approved* , r F4 ,e . 5.3 ZONING. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 2-76 ,.e k",s £, tos4; a! E �:. '' ;° A proposed amendment of the Tigard Zoning Code, amending Chapter 18.20 to include a new zoning classification for ���, 3 dwelling units per acre (R-10) . 1 Ott ,'L A. Staff Report: read by Laws . ,.,'::.'.4-',-,',.4 tiM} B. Public Testimony. none. 1`fl T''''''; C. Staff Recommendation. APPROVAL, recommending the Sir ,,,,„ f following amendments to be made to Chapter 18, TMC. , °: t, eta ;����` Chapter 18.20 shall be amended `t;o read;` � • �fEl 4 r"s,'' Single Family Residential Zones (R-7, R. 10, R-15, ; r ,, . R-30) .. ri`r �`lf' Under the heading of Sections, a new section shall i 1 1,{r '',Ir be created. 18 20.035 Lot - R�-10 zone $ �1%`:1# The following sections shall be amended to include r, i T r N the new R-10 zone: i f r+ ,,,,,,..','f,,,:;,,. r ' b ii ' . :,,.'''‘'''''',..,' i'r>�' t ;�� S i &f f .' u ,un h 5'^ .'..Y4..: t'.'+°{r.�e•lYr,.ra, �M '•FN9?,N4.a,k++ "r .o...AiL,'i. 'M 11 >j, xrt rr :,. ti:; Ms r, t...... Tf2M`P:. wN °'„',°X .- ..M ... ., ._ ..T:' thl:,.. » 11a5 °7 .'4 tE "h-5# ma',,, E'{ 7. 1 7 !.1 J k.. �!`. +� • .'. ..f-0,y14Sk]��1� 1 �'3,'7.:�e+. 1-i.Y. .5 .. .,r:. �.. ., ...,. . '�Y. 1�S�C�6�;7.`�Zp! ...,.... ... ?. 5W , u 5 . »1'C E.1 ; ;.. .._ ,.. c. ,. ,� » J s..,. -1,- , h;,... 7> , .. �„ .,..,.-,a,... '1-i.': ai.. , ,,� `n, -<,..,�, rs ,,.. „. L.,<.. . c� ,.r , .,.. .»`._... .. r...,s.. ..4 r...� s-� R. i.�.... ..-.h .. ,.. .., .,t ,f.. �- -� .'�".. f?' t �. �i ., .� .1.. ': a a1 t. .... .).,r. ...... rk.. _,,} { .. ). .. .1 . . '1, 4. v.. e...,... .1 ��. i 77 l r rfi,.. t .,,r., t3...: _ r .t�5: .,... ...�...t. .. .. �,...r,,. .S , ... r .. . . 3 ,d ''4 � d �r.. .. r .t5� , .. } ...... ..u.Ye ., t`. . ,, .�r. ., r. ,�..i.. � .. t.�, .. 7 ...,. .... .- � ei F n't .,. ail , r, 1.-c. Y L a � -,2' .,.. .1-«. a. .-3 . ..: �+... ra .-. 't,. k �` T T 1�i h.. . _ ..,. .. t. 'r s .:r.. �,.. ,� ..x._: .... .:.. .t. ....�.. ., c,.. jj .� .d4.JJ (( +7ro ... <r f.f, e\,w.. , �r xl., .. ..: f-,..,C. C. ,.9A «.h Ix .. _,e s Yl �.•e M, U.151..,..Al2x J.' .Y'k �” �t 4 '}f. 1e :J ,Ft b.. M• t ,... �4�'k{.. �+_ ...>. 7..rr .._. f. y4::.. {. ,-... .. ,. ,5.;`s s .. :..,. .i�t,... A'1.,. E V. .t,. tr. . ,..,.. . .ii„ -3•.h•.a. tm,,.., x,:•... -:.ar.. .>�''..i4�t :..t .,..5 U ....'t',r'?a E �i,:. '�+.. 5 P. ,�.:.� .. .�54�, .,.7f-:ti. �(... r.: 5, r. r7...-tf..c, .....,n. �,�.. �4 >f•..',n� i.,,., '}'fin,. ... f 2�aW 4•��.i,.. 44.. ...c Sit r4,.` �: F17 7' 7e i``si, page 4 n" PC Minutes 73 t ' 4C;1' 4/6/76 a �4 { a �8w!t Y;, , Section 18.20.010 Permitted Uses. In an R-7, R�10, ; � ; R-15, R-30 zone. A apt r Section 18.20.020 Conditional Uses. In an R-7, R-10 T R-15 R-30 zone. ,iP, rdt A. new section shall be created to reflect the lot area k� and maximum coverage. ''' 18 0 20.035 Lot -- Ra-10 zone. In an R-10 zone the - , - lot size shall be as ,�t a follows: ii t t x P ' (1) The minimum lot area shall be ten thousand sq. ft, ;' I. , rtf 4 (2) The '.maximum lot coverage shall be thirty-five ):,''',1,,', percent 9 '' Section 18.20.0`60 Setback. Shall be amended to read: 1.i ; ,: R-7, R-10 'or R-15 zones, Except as may otherwise , , ' be provided in Section 18.20,100 the setbacks in '' 43 an R-7, R-10 or R-15 zone shall be as follows. . . r r , # ' Section 18.20.080 Building Height. shall be amended t, r ,', red d:� � to:,read e hie Except as provided in Section 18.12.110, no building in an R-7, R.-10, R-15 or R-30 zone shall exceed® t r w�t s -',,fir' D. Commission Discussion and Action: t., Rat{�.� 1 : [+l ,','k; o Motion for approval (Wakem) ,: Y... . �,kl r ,i k 0 Seconded (Moore) , ,,,'''.',:?-= 0 Unanimously approved. } y,t , y, .,4 ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 3-76 L , , Y A request by the City of Tigard amending the landscaping 71 ; ' ' standards of the Zoning Ordinance (Title 18, Section 18.58.050) , R;' N requiring that security be posted with the City equal to r7 r 110% of the cost of the proposed landscaping as determined N rttr1' ,$Sr 1 by the City Planning Director before the issuance of any t .,i building permits. tip,'„ 1,',',',,',, A. Staff Reports- Bolen stated that he had contacted other ` ', ;, jurisdictions regarding this matter and 45 t_ had concluded that the present method is ' .'+' ), both the most effective and involves the least staff time y �r �Stiy44 ,a r,.,,-,,,•.7,,..,.,„`ii :...7.1 l .' x ..,1:1,....,,),.';':17',r,-,. v r,......r,.,. .. ,r...,.1........,.I..r........r.....:... .F.-.,...,.....,+s..,".4 z 1.,.:r,<a"�,.,,8..s...tr F.z?^a,k d..-..7 n..r�._..^..!r`r.N,J.:..,N F...>.<...-,.:,,..._..-,...r"_.,k...7.'i.,"..tkt-W F...-.,-.Y..,.:.':..",.P..-.-'r.,.....l"...=t 4—.fx..*.t h,.!,t-,''....�....,;+r�. ....,.' .-....3.....,......z.,...�.z-�t...............�,...�,,..:......,!3.-.......,_....'?..�.iCX1:..l...,iii.r!,.,.,r...�...:„.., .r..t -..,,n.>....k.,tL:..Y i•,-...r.,.,.:.#..,..»{..y.._,.w<..Y.L._..?5 r.,..1..14:..n:Y ..c 8C.t•.:.�r. 4'.'1".`,”f:Y,. ,{�...4,.1'' _....�uw A,..s'tr4 o...fr.x..4 Y'..x k.1...,..t...Ir..N•J,s,..,,.,.1,./y...�.§�5.,, 5.�..,....., xr 1r } .`...,e'..,'�. . Z a Y. dk.„r 92 S t t a J �. z�r r 4,td.l 7. . +�,[�y�rr.�at r,a• ., rx r.x,.t c fi). 1.i. lx.,1.,i + , x.tt,L s rr,,.t a Y.,r�`� .r t�M+� fd;a v» a 7 t n.w r r V<'.ft+�a�V..� ���s4 ot . f4 a+.L. ;a c5 nr6 Y v. ,4 t+3.t�»L,�a i'stG Y?.i,,r,7!f V t7P' + r1 rcr .'s i' .. F k IY} Tn. '1'if, r, ';,`s w. page 5 `k,„ l ( IM1if4�A PC Minutes - #i Tt� :I , 4/6/76 r g, .phi ''t B. Public Testimony: None. t u '11y.. C. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommended retaining the f' 'a present system as stated in section r,' - 18.58.050 of the TMC. .'� D. Commission Discussion and Action: `I. 0 Popp asked if there has been any difficulty in having ` applicants meet their landscaping requirements. 0 Wakem stated that he felt that this matter could be rfi ,'''' ' , resolved between the two departments -- planning and } building. , Sr¢� « ' 0 Wakem motioned for denial. ,tt� o Seconded (Moore) . 3 Ya�i o Unanimously approved. 1 j4 ''''. 5.5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CU 5-76 (Kessinger) , it r z. ø" A. request by Earl Kessinger for outside storage of wood i, products on a parcel of land in an M-3 (Light industrial) � p` zone at 12560 SW Hall Blvd. (Wash. Co. tax map 251, 1BC yN°a ,,,„ tax lot 2401) . F4. :,.f (tabled from February 17, 1976, meeting) i €fir A. Staff Report: read by Laws. B. Applicant Presentation: 11'r,t o Mr.'"Ted Nelson, stockholder in Highline Forest Products, stated the nature of his business, emphasiz- - 1°i ing that it was not a retail, but a wholesale lumber brokerage. Nelson further stated that you have to : 3 "look hard" to see the lumber stored on the premises t and that the building serves to hide most of 3.t. , f t� , R,I 1 ? C. Public Testimony: None. ,ice,. ,, D. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommended APPROVAL, on t " the condition that the applicant submit a site 9 plan. I u : to staff which effectively screens the storage area a s.i C. Rebuttal: • ' . ,''' ` o Nelson stated that he was a lessee of Mr. David Trumbo r k ', :. and that this lease was on a 90 day basis,c.that lum r y'. ' RR j '1,,,, k ,.,°:,,,,''',,`',':eft I ...: ....„„..,„,,„..„,,,„,,,,,„t,„...„,7„ r..., `'MEA .( .!r.rtM,i"•^"Ya1 P..'N;+,+4 s , .' r. t., •.• . �. ;.... .: J a q (t :..,{ {k S a..er , + ;Rd I }Yf , . .)!!f. ..... "�^"'ae' #:'t”. T ..!s�ra:vew+•r..d: E. 5+?s,n, . .-n .t�, .. *.. _ f - CC,,�� 33mtk G'�i ...,: . mr , 'F�rt�Jf:X�t v t ,+ e Y�, �,c � S . . . ,' 64. x:.. ,4... Y.7... 1 ..f,. .,r,, ! ,' VA" ` Y 1 -�. t , .a. a . . 1 -, .. ...yam• n.7 ..: . a f . . . �` s . . 1 :-n� Kt { H`...- .. J .�.,.h:- ..:.v 3. • '1. n. .._. . e# ' 1?.,., .. .. ai ,n ,,. ... ,. ..._ T 1I/S .; .w rt .,... .. "�. lif" v .. A .f x . c x +. t .. it C(., d ....41 .. w d'e. . .: .P . -._ %` l .I ...._. r �{..v..'4. ,. .:r. . ... lN'x .. .t w .. : L,.,.. i s.,. , : ..� , rt�. ..f.. . � '.t....,.. . .,.' i',,!;'..$,,'-e , t 1 S. M P C �� , , Y M1 k l .. F s "� ' fir:v y.:r 5.,.: .Ci .Y t,y t 4% Fit ..a..� � . .._ .. liA C + .Ik. 'G,F .... �Y. , •} ..., ../,,r+. N�_. .T'f ...-r. . ,.: M1 .� S. .: .. .}. [:L. Y.. . nk xh :.� Ire �" ... t. , :..r, .�.:. :.,.. . a. ,t •, �:t` .,.n...}. Y R. ...,,9.. . t :. - . '$.h t.st. � 4. •�f"11 _ . .. s ,. .. : . ...k. L c v 1 ..n ..1. .t s fa li ,•... 1 af_rr..... :,;`:-1-,.. L i y 3. r *. :1r.L •*.:.... .7 F".� � {•.v,...>81. .T .. . Sx , . � 'V .....4 .,. � .. i , ., r � x,.};,....l i 5 Q rti f .r '� .,t..C.:- ......,..,., ... ..:. .:,.._..,...:.:,•. , ... aa`t.....r ,ki � <.:.1.: tbr ..., ny.,. f.. �,. 1..a. , n cfa., _.._,.,. :+ , ,.. .! t ,f+�!�... ..... ,.';',-'''''1,';4t _., .rY ex,. ,{,`l tx r a w..".KU.+,�5 ry.E.- :4,c at 2{jy * I} %II �;'j;` page 6 ,° ' a PC Minutes t,�,•; �, '1 7 4/6/76 a • a�J • ; k: i Y, 3tF` 1�= .*,, f1 f ber stored on the premises is not owned by DBA F , s Highlin.e Forest Products, but that they are only rF r,, a sub-lease tenant and that Herb 'Morissette Builders !'i rent space from i.rumbo for sto,+age of lumber as well ,tk ' Fii 0 Bolen stated that perhaps the person we should be ; �'`. talking to is M7`. Trumbo as he is the owner of the . property and that Mr. Morissette pays money to Trumbo �r�. to 'store material on the site iy 1P�;•K Pte .. 1}.. F ' F. Commission Discussion and Action F i 7 t oF2 - o Wa em stated that when drivin g by the site if he , 3, , \,' had not known about it, he would not have been aware J of the lumber storage. 1 S " 0 Nicoll stated that since there are additional parties ''z involved in the storage of materials on the site, it does not say `what they'll do in the future as to I;` S i� u{" increase or decrease in the amount of outside storage. k' ',..r..,.s." 0 Wakem asked staff to find out how many parties were R [4 4kp t- ' involved in the outside storage and that, at this .; ,• , time, it would be difficult to take action as all 1, the information is not avail.aole ,, X• y ... 0 Wakem. motioned to table until all parties could be ;' :, , present to give input, in that they would be subject .I'; to bearing the cost of some type of screening device. ' . With all parties present, the Commission would then z . be able to find out what the impacts would be. , 4; o Moore .seonded. ,* o Unanimously approved. , 5.6 FLOOD PLAIN FILL PERMIT- M 1-76 (Bartel) '4 ,!,. . '' A request for a flood plain fill permit to fill lands � l�� presently situated within the 100 year flood plain, located f , i, 660 ft-', south of .SW..Bonita Rd. on 74th Ave. (Wash: Co. - Ids r.tE � , tax map 281 12A, tax lots 1100 and 1200) . - 1 `' , A. Staff Report: read by Bolen. �t>r�r ;'' B. Applicant's Presentation: t 4 ' o Ray Bartel, architect for the proposed application, i ' k.' stated that there were two issues involved - one, '. , development Property along r � • a concern ern for level o went of ro er� al on 74th' iii ., ' _ - f ', `;K,,." and two that there would be no adverse effects on 1 , „�F, properties both up and downstream.Y � c „,:,.,,,,,,,,,„,,: ,, 0 'r .q a.... ".: as ra,. .... M- ,• ;I:',',.1.-5,,..y� . n7`..'-‘ ,' e. s '�T; .:b•.7i- •' l,,,.is 1. 1 ,.. Y. 1 f .v;... , '‘'1..'1'''''''':',.'" .. �^,M gi^...T,1.';'.',,,�' wi., ^4 , aw9 °trrs:s"t.m 1 � f.. ... ... 4 4. , r 1 t<.�-+.rY , r 4 € .a s ... fi7'... 647•. .., . r . .t”. . o . °9 ..7,.t'.- t.. f. .`v A:Si :;,-1.. .! is , .,. +...... , n.i, ..., ,.,. 1.,. d. 771-,',1'.,.r 4..,.. '4 .. :, ... ..,, .... 3r�� ,, sF, rr. .'�+ d' a s.r. ....._ � . .» .< r,,f ...,� . , .e..i P"" ,.�. +. ;s . ..s 3�.fi.f,...,,,,,,,.4,.,,-,..,;.,,;.,,,',,,,,.:.,;'.:. r k �±a `_.., a.. ,. ,:t ., .tf-...., > o -w. ,., t ., .. . .., ,.>t r. L�•r t. 2..a., �. , ..... `t t v s. R .H.,..A , �,Yt. ,t ,. . w".. -. , .........S . F c � i { s t..., >.. , .. .. ..,, e. ( .. ,...: I? R1.t.}», .0 ! 3.��sne . ?., > tr s .3 +.+.a. R... h.. ., f..k � ->. �., .{ F....x a ., . az....,. .1 a. .. ,r., ... 1 lit � . r. ,.. t- h.. ..,.. ,. ,t h.... ... { .t F.. Y„ �, A Xn . ,.. f,... „?n� tt.� .*�; tt "+<Y ,.. .. . u . ...<...... t k s ,.,.. .t .,,x 4 >, _ ..., .. . .k ,3 � .X a •tis '1. ? z. 9- 5` ...1�.�.. .., .rf...4..: m.z.R}.�7,,,.,..,+..... .x... 1'4 Y +... r ..t.'t..{ ., . d.. i :,R. { 5 ..1< .t �t.. t,r:. th,F s �:.. 4 r � ! >. o.: u �. .... fs... .-.... w.t } E 1 at i .,.. 4.. ?, .,,^: . k-. !f :'•6 LF:tfi r ..,....1 ,,>...� ffi. ,, ,... 1. •tx4 .,. tk ...-•Lx.?r'... F r'yi, IY` zx '',,7:''''. _ ,' j page ,,,,,,,z,,r PC Minutes r�. ;x', 4/6/76 f t`fia, } 'C',' Bartel stated that the proposal was in keeping t with the Cornpr,ehens].ve Plan and graphically f illustrated the anticipated effects the land fill )2,' would have on the velocity flow to Fanno Creek. o Nicoli asked Bartel how the fill would be obtained. '4 C4': r ter'+ 0 Bartel responded that he hoped he would not have to haul in fill, but to provide it on-site. '` ' Ijryr y, , :‘1:1.,,,, C. Public Testimony: None ; v‘# D. Staff Recommendation: APPROVAL, with following conditions `,4 ' 1. That a detailed engineering plan be submitted .,,,i i, review and t 1< �, to the Corps of Engineers for their ' E comment, which complies with the flood plain �, " fill concept approved by the Planning' Com .,,:, mission when the applicant wishes to proceed ..Cy ' with the project,.4 f 1- �,.. The m 1" sub Z�ted detailed plan should provide r, adequate bank stabilization techniques and : concern for maintenance of the floodwayo , ,� ,� i - 2, ' That a public access easement for pedestrian i1s and bike paths be provided on all land west of Fanno Creek and for a distance extending 50 ft. 1. t s�ttj. • k , from the stream channel on the` east side. 0 Nicoll stated that someone +ualified t? '1,"'„,''',...',.,,.'‘ qualified, e.g. hydraulic ,'..11,, ,,, � engineer, review the application and make recommend- r� ations. , 6., - b, '} ' o Bolen suggested taking this matter to the Corps of` ''[, v' Engineers for, their review N, '.'.,...-,4,-'.,,i E. Rebuttal: None. °.,.1 F. Commission Discussion and Action; ' 4 si o sakata moved to approve the flood plain fill permit i with staff recommendations 1 and 2 and added a 3rd condition that a non-remonstrance agreement be filed ,'''', with the City Recorder for an LID, upon which time t' , 74th would be developed to full City standards. y� o Wakem stated that the Howe E. Lee application, which . was before the Commission, was tabled for essentially by f, :. Cdr. � a ai.3 r f �»G Yi x ry ,�, r,,.. }-�T�� at£?f*5£� Y�S� '�t;{��ii7 j'a a� `rk,' x+s.r'e�i;y + ww h. t ... :.;. . n�a. :.�.a. ,.Y t ...�;. ..� )r,.,a'�..x..r-,, ih .r ri �1°,C�'wMl-. . Y - rS. S, ...r.1^.a r ,._ Z..,..,, .. t,� �,... .,.n;. #i.. t e 4.. �x.. ..,# -. �. ..'°;°C .. .... ... -. t y:':.Z.. x. A i x �� G4. : .Y,..5 .,.X'.... ....�. t t �.. ..lc .. ., i.:..... 1 t.{ + .. ...4.,.., , �y2.{Ie,l..r,,.s:�..... !~W.,rcefx t ...y��. y y..9-r+ �`l�.'z,a.- 5� .'��t �5� �`tY;..; r;.r � 3.:s.. ; 'y{''� � t a i;!,.; s �i� e�� ii .,...., »?r: • «t s:x<r,Y..£.�,f. � +.u,i.�:+�- " ,n �' +ire � Lx4� 5�g 1 z s rr 9i we .:.ta kk`: .,z:.: � '"+,15 .-r,.it$_,*�!' ��. " h��� `t�[a^"a t.,ia�t�r��;rwi+� �fXR� ''',,,,,':„.: -*- ' te .. #s t1 r; i.S+a !. . A el' '; page '', pg ar PC Minute s 4/6/7 ! Ik���' !tt 5!,.' the same reasons until a Corps of Engineers ''wr { study was made regarding the impacts the filling '_'' ., would have on surrounding properties. ,,1 tr • s,. 1j�„, 0 Nicoli seconded the motion. w. 0 Motion carried 4-� Sakata 9 Nicoll, Po Moore es . s Popp, , Wakem - no ; 6. SUBDIVISIONS ,� 6.1 S 2-76 (Summerfield Phase IV) ::::",t't. A request f or approval of a preliminary plat fore Phase IV,Sumrnerfield. Planned Development.,. located east of 98th - '' between SW Sattler and Durham Rd. (Wash, Co, tax map fi` ` 2S1 11C, tax lots 1600, 1700, 2000 & 2600, ,tax map 4,' s 2S1 11.D, tax lots 900 and 1500) . t;„t °''' A. Staff Report: read by Bolen. t is''lk i rYlY+x Be Applicant Presentation: 11 f ,T`1 0 Bill McMonagle, engineer for Tualatin Development i Co, stated that meetings with representatives ,y3 ia° • 9 1' j. r.,r, from Summerfield Men's Association had produced .''sic'''''; some compromises as to the layout of the 4th and 5th 4,i holes. F 2,1,:,','',--:,' ' t s,}lt ,r., o McMonagle stated the increases and decreases in yard-• `',,P age that would occur on the 3rd, 4th and 5th fairways , `t as shown on the preliminary plat proposal. He x responded to staff's's report,paddressng himself to "r','` staff findings concerning "conventional subdivision”, .,,rY�. road network access to Durham and placement of houses 1 ,,, on the sub jec t ,site. '4 o Wakem asked McMonagle as to Tualatin Development, ��,, '' Company's intent in altering the 5th hole. '''''.< o Moore asked McMonagle, if he had been involved with x}s the master plan from the beginning. . ou , o Wakem asked the di fferences between "attached” v. ' f I y ,. "detached" units as they relate to the master plan €rx '"" and concept proposal. fty+.4 ' ',�'�,� C Public Testimony: }�a t;; . o Larry Krause, Century Oak Circle, Surr nerfield, 71, stated that the plan, as proposed, does not adhere to the concept as depicted on the ?raster plan and he a x ;kx‘ .M d 1 yq..:_r:q:a ut*w{.F.w..}y�•i',•:,.yy d� .F'.h,..".r�r�V�f t s i�.......at.,a:.�4i�,,CcsE'+�9s.t i 1}.:fa'y c+w.„..+>..er.3 p �t1 gl p aiY.4!'•a:w? ,<_`�.r.f r....0 t Y tme,.x..n.i}r5+',.T kw. ..._ tV� ' P i, �v§s a x.'k,T.�`'T P l Ya F ,•4 . i ..fi1 i kf�.,l": xQ z �4 t4'kVFt ort s v.art a SL�(R�'a}r�Ci i t�- •. Ar f�-t.i.:�•iK c .� � 4''''.`,`',+t 2^t• is.� r ht� .a �k t ti 3 � ?:La,yt i, +. Y #x,} page 9 ,. PC Minutes �t`�" 4/6/76 { 1,1 •, `irY questioned the access onto Durham because. of the future widening plans for this street. Krause stated that "the road system is an abomination for access onto Sattler as proposed"z and that there was r not enough greens space depicted on the preliminary plat as opposed to that being shown on the master ^ sit Plan. 5 rya „ o Mr. Jeff Harris, resident of Summerfield, said that �'tktr' he had confidence in TDC developing the property. 0 Mr. Scalleron, Century Oak Drive, Summerfield, asked �x �T t .7�T 3 3 � McMonagle about the proposed road system, stating T� that he opposed the road network as shown on the preliminary plan. 0 Morry Hellser questioned the proposed alteration of the 4th fairway. FF, o Erskine P. Wood, Summerfield resident, concurred . with Mr. Krause 's statements and further stated that TDC is using the original layout to sell their pro - , duct and packing the phase 4 proposal with less $�r; o en space and smaller lots. y{ri�'a Y f D Staff Recommendation. \zr 0 Staff recommended that the applicant either rework t� : the submitted plan, using the adopted development plan as a guide, or apply for an amendment to the Y ,a adopted Planned Development Zone. bT,r,., E. Rebuttal: e�it �> r faer3 o McMonagle defended the preliminary plat concept and reiterated -the proposed street system and lot '>Y configurations. a Robert Waterman, Century Oak Dr. , supported Mr. Jeff Harris ' statement concerning his confidence 3x ii£ in TDC in doing a good job. , A} , tr tSY• o Stewart Nill! Century Oak Dr. , asked McMonagle if any of the lots facing Sattler were less than 50 ft. o McMonagle'answered that none of the townhouse lots were 50 ft , in size. \ .tY t 4 . Fz` o Mr. Ripley, Summerfield resident, asked why the � �"' townhouses along the east side of the 4th fairway F , pp, fret -.w -., ys:kF! r ,..-6W6' GeC' a4r,w:2'-"+'y`""6',.:+•"Y Tr, ..1 :'�^ti+^M" -fe*r'., .: r,C :4•^ A." FY,w.•w. 3 r fi :k. \ z;:e .... .. :. .; v ,�,. ^!,.,•, t'St.�r •:«. 'r•..\ .. , e`er K_ . ... .... 'y">"'a` .. .. .. .,.- m :;: ... -y 'rr. , s. i. , ,. ..a . 1... i 9.., ,.0 ..'... w- t i , .y. it ... .. .tt. .. , . ... ....,.._, .,.. x^:..p j..^Sn:+ . F y :.a,'• k-Ee _...., ...... '{..i..-,. 'D:..,.,. f`.'-. ,. :w� .,.,7','r., ... ....a,.t . ,x.+.d w., .. .. .. r.. ,. \ ."'r.Y1... r ..e..... 'h-.. .... i .:s e.. .r_ ..,, } + s. •Ft.., ,... .{.. 3 w.;.a...c..++...... .4... � ..,.,., ,z.. ..+..s_.5 ,x:;h <_...;,.,.., e._..,i ,. t .h+S., . a : .,...,... ¢...,, ,.. i., ..2.. .,:r„ �,� � .t. hta....c.v, c,.zr -.r•-:si'•,r.'- . ,t.. n1.. . L Ltz }'1+. Vii. i a': � F4c: a'*y. ''t s;t :1`,-. L rys t;sal? ' ( page 10 ` PC Minutes 3 1 �¢},�f 4/6/76 K ,,, . l yy ,, a.f could not be separated further apart so that a 1. better view of the course could be made available. - turf s, t o Bob Santee Summerfield resident asked if homes, , '' on the east side of the 4th fairway will have a path- ' l' i way to the courses �, 11„, o Mrs. Slanker stated that she was concerned about z' T� access to the golf course from the east side of 3., ' the 4th fairway. ,; F. Commission Discussion and Action: r ,'& r `� o Moore stated that he was concerned with the traffic r � ; pattern and its access to Durham Rd from the site f� ; rn, ; and that the preliminary plan was making major ` f changes from the original concept plan and that he f,x lt,, would like to see an amendment to the conce t plan. `' �r� p p Yg � } o Wakem echoed Moore r s ;comments regarding traffic r* ,C patterns and was concerned with the two entrances riz• ., '` onto Durham and the modification in this area, and (C.1 �' modiz cation to the preliminary plan was needed # a'1 . �s iii in this area Overall, Wakem stated that the pre-- .s ,�� i; liminary plan was a decided departure from the i ; ,: original plan and that he would like to see an . Y ''',..:,:j?,. amendment to the original concept plan, rr��� h It � '�`M1=h; o Sakata stated that the two entrances proposed onto :',,,... 01:1., Durham and Sattler will help to alleviate potential r "y traffic problems, but would like to see some changes ''' ' ;', t in the other portion of the street system She }ik further stated that she would like to see a break i1 Yx in the housing pattern, possibly being accomplished ' ,, 1(..,;,,4.,i through a cul.-de--sac system. f �4r x, o Sakata also stated that a walkway access from the P \ N.,,,,, triangle should be provided and that a reconsideration t of the pool concept shown to be located in the "tri r '''' i .Y,, �� angle portion" between tree' 3rd, 4th and 5th holes 1 .F` � ; ; should be reconsidered4 ,+ r y� o Nicoll asked staff as to the next step this matter ' would take and if another public hearing would be .' held on this application `k ''.; o Moore 'made a motion to deny the preliminary plat::,,,,,,:,,, and variance with no recommendation in that the 3 Y, preliminary plan was not in keepinggwith the original * s ` master plan as approved, d-t,,# ;:;,1, t i1,r 4.4',}i r ,tai {KiY rA y :kr i Ih 1735 '' a ',.ii 3.''f4' 7 f ,�'' 5,..,,..±-.- : f.t,...,,...._.r... —...._.,i.......a ....•?r....r"?,:..'*..,.....,...�7.,:s..fi i,.r 1:�i._.t...k J...r.1�a san t,,.,.fis,...-....a.a.cC...S�....,':._+.,_,.... r".:°T.::r..,.,.,`,..N...`"'5S r ..4,.,...1.p•..,.er...,.i._...._,,._..,.....,.,,....... .:..'.,..'.°..,.. ,.-v..... r�ti�.,f.f.��Nf.*,?-.r'4.°•i ‘'')",..°41'''''4:',,4'.t.°': ,7,-� x.,.'T 3r:=..�t+ ..,..x. r L`. .sr w st e 1�yn.i� 74 ..�;A M1°,°,..1`°,°' ';. l'' 4.,...,.�K.„.°:°,°'.. ga�ur!M1 j\�, r,�u rti Kl,.._1!.. .w.}-_ic t r w+...#,...iP, #"zr f,,., r�Y..>».<tf\b,`'z'''...,:,„6; ..tr44. n'',1''''. ,.r,? '''''..‘,".1°",`:;:',,''',°,, ev1.r,.J Y,.5Y.Y .. r h uu v..�k p.,:•,-;&;a r..r wr r +=. #;4r .s, ,P s.s n�' »s .z n ■ . .+e� , r, y, ,t. ,, ,.• ,. , j ; y.1■{h r+ S y a. 1 r�1 page 11 ;'.II:''' PC Minutes € 4/ /7 4r a 0 Seconded (Wakem) , ';,y,,. . o Approved unanimously. 1,r h .t..,:---, fl ,,;,, 7 MISCELLANEOUS ' 7.1 An interpretation of use to determine whether a Shaklee �` 3• '�' Home Products distributorship and salesroom is similar '''-'7,::.' to other outright permitted uses in the C-3, general ,,,,, comm.er.cial zone. k}at A. Staff stated that they saw no problems with this use F : and that in staff's s o inion it was similar to -other � opinion, , uses permitted in the C-3` zone. --.'x B. Commission Discussion and Action: cl gin, > 0 Nicoll. moved to approve. ; rah:. E .• -.. o Moore seconded. 4+art o Unanimously approved.. . '4 72 SIGN CODE APPEAL SCA 3-76 (Masonic Temple) F , 7 ` A request by the Tigard Lodge 207, A.F. and A.M. (Masonic "` 4 . l Temple) to erect a temporary sign advertising a fund raising 'i breakfast on Easter Sunday, April 18, 1976. "- A. Staff Report: t . 0 Staff submitted into the record a letter from Mr. r'L James Hargrave, Secretary for the Masonic Temple, ,�,* requesting that a temporary sign be erected on the i. , ;. church premises from April 14th to April 18th, to be removed on 4/18/76 fi` ,. o Laws informed the Commissioners that staff did not -- u. have the 'authority to issue a permit (sign) because il},y of the type of sign being proposed and that a 1. . .': variance would be required. ; o Motion for approval (Moore) 3 o Seconded (Sakata) . , r`z ;1 a o Unanimously approved. a r. ‘.,.',',',',',..,:ii.,',::,' 7.3 CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW CU 21-75 s, 4 ' Conditional use 'revi`ew of "Georgia Pacific Corpora�tions 's a ; , • 3 v4a rYki.4 . ,„ <.,¢._r-•u s •„1,. ,„ - trr�?rt?,r,„:17„. ,,„, .sY»nc.o-exP;b.t«an. .`�. r• . J 1,w#,:- ...k,,W'ur ,Y....L, ..t e d y� , } i. t.. , r ;-4'.1;.,-.:..,:',;.;it-7,':-.:-., ' A , ra?h?,IF(`sr.n .F .. Y. f.. "4?-� aYA? .. ... ..• . . fin+ . � .ii4..], ... +N {,ru +t” 1+ d. ...r,l.,.:...4. .. . ..�.. ...,.. :£sr . ....a �'.. ...... .. . r. _. Win... F ..,. ,...+�7-"-.-,.... .. �- . c > 6 �.. e a �1"" x. . ;t...a . _?k"ees,. . 'S5 a. ,-. . .a-.: ,.. >.,7`".t` ,... .+s...f 3 a3...n r x , � is i. s , Y .j . r ,.. �. � . ... t ,. t.r .s�F.-F.+ 3. a s�,.;x. �c . � �,. ... .., .r.., . - ._. .. 1 .. .,.._.,. ,. h. s .� ,.a. r t... ,}, a� :,h?N P 'i sr^A +`,�. ..s�.k;�u .-` 5 x . ,,,a„ .» y�. ire ... ...1. .,,. ....,. .. ..,, - �.. .. S [,�. .S .f 7. rK.. ; , _.x A .. .. � . R 1. ... :.,a q ,,.. a p+5. _ .-. +s\.„4',+..,.e•... � f!` i a.t ^F� ,�.�. ....�,e.. �t.:t.•. « ,�T, .yn.. ,N�.., ,,..J.r� � • .r. . r . fir „�..a ix .. <, .,, .� e.. : ... . .7. -t � . ? t 7.r:y>:. �::i. ,.sew..�... -,,.t: .�`�... ,5 ....+,F .5..... ., >.., ..�`t;.'a, l ,t.:.Y x�.. y ?S! v 1. � .wX,._� C..v.t. >.,.xa .$:�^,- t. :i .1 r._r.z w+..�.. , `U . _ ,r # .. •a.ve,... �. .. a A. s n.i t .. a -.,.a c.... � ,,a.ac.. .4.,.�• ..r�....ss ..:.-.., ....... , .�' ... . r r .r..... ,.� ,. .r. axtr.. F , »t_ SZ4i 1 i}r kn e page 12 PC Minutes 4/6/76 F , bake-out oven, (Tabled from Planning Commission meeting of 3/16/76) . r � o S t of f' info r d t he C o mm i s s l'o n er s th at no deleterious t er ou s '; effects from the bake out oven operation had been brought to staff=s attention, „ 0 Popp stated that';,1..e knew of no problems being created 4 alt,. r, by the operation of the oven, o Popp moved for approval. t UY o Seconded by Wakem, txr 0 Unanimously approved.' t3��rt 8. OTHER. BUSINESS: None. a t1r 9. _ADJOURIVFNT: 11 55 p.m. . �r w i dS C Sqf�4at 1 tg 11Y' • �to'L 1 C 7'�m t1 a y .ly,M11 s w a a k rc v. dz. .y.. r,. ,. >h .... ... ,. �... .....,.✓'.., .r .} ..-• ... ....n.. H. ..... � _: ... ... ... ....i ,,.Y,..S. r..... f z ;.Y. ,. ,..v.. Y. a.. er.,`k:: ., . ...._ _....3.. x. ...�(`�tt.. ._ 4 ,. ...5 M..,. .,,.., i I. ....r?4 .... .: -,..ti ,F....J n .. _. ..✓. -0 ..,.,..1:..,. .. ,>.' � ..F,. .. ...,e.,. .z. .,.., �,. ...,, 1. S ..y,t;.,..k T..a�."....a...,i �;�, nl.�v,h, �._. ✓.:.t.. ... .}'Y'�..d t r,.,,,t'.;�2�. .., .:,4^ y �.,htss.. ;...,. r`i 1 m'i,N .y z.. `•:�0 ,.r,. r `si` ...2f.-w ,ti'`�r F n :.> r3. .L.e ,...�,.,... .. ...�. .,. .�:.... - t.. �.. ..,,,...:r..- ._ ..,.- ,..:............._.:-,e. -. .......-.,... :✓,�.. a �'._ ., ,...,. -T=+,�` ., ._ ....... ... `.,, ..�, .. },.Z,-.,tz�.. �' �,.. e.x ar: y4� ' t)?< (4�' kit 1 I f Srr 'J ,L'i i' e f,'" STAFF REPORT 3¢R,:.. ... Tigard Planning Commission. April 6, 1976 s ryy. 7 ZoA 3- Agenda Item 5.4 � a CE { ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NT a A request by the City of Tigard, amending the landscaping ., standards of the Zoning Ordinance (Title 18 Section 18 58 050) gar". requiring that security be posted with .the City equal to 110% rx,,r of the cost of the proposed landscaping as determined by the y 5 City Planning Director before the 'issuance of any building t rig permits. ar STAFF FINDINGS <s a 1. The Building Official has requested the Planning Dept. :1J'..-s-":! staff to have the Planning Commission review means of insuring the installation of required landscaping. The purpose of this request is to lessen the work load for the Building Dept. Presently it is the responsibility of the Building Official to determine that required landscaping has been installed before issuance of an occupancy permit. The Building Official is concerned about the amount of time spent in this area As an alternative, he has suggested lty5 allowing the posting of a bond covering the amount of the landscaping required. In this way, the lack of completed landscaping would not be an issue for his consideration when, issuing an occupancy permits tPf, The present code does allow a building to be occupied before landscaping is installed, provided a bond is posted, assuring Fti^ that installation will be made within six months. 2 Other jurisdictions were contacted regarding this matter and the staff has concluded that the present method is both kip the most effective and involves the least staff time. The City of Beaverton, for example, has had considerable �rF! legal red tape to deal with when, attempting to collect on t�xti- landscape bonds., fM, f 7 tds xy. ra { >nS .. - .,.. ,XCkA!z ,-4 ...� V!!T., �'."3ftR•....,.. x- :, .. , Y"a*45" Zc+ ..P3' "'#M+ ! -'. x .! a k Fa��.. Y ... .. .-.::,.. ?? r3�?` .�'^. 7".' _.. .. r,r ......�. :..♦.c ,. ,r. t°a„'G'�` k-'t�;.., �'^.'!r 4r,S t- Y:, t r_..rx` 4. $ :..lc.�N. ♦ . i.a:.,- ..:.. <. t. ...r- .. ,. Y. .. •b. a. .. e_.. .t..,.. ,a : F .a.. x. ... -.-...i' �'1 ,J .f..� )' i' kt�: _+y f. .ti .... ..T ,..Z �..., ..,..3-...iv � .,.' %..,. S .8. a....s.. ..,.... :.. ♦ 1, ..,.� r.SPa..dS...- � A, ....... .... .. Y .�., ..:.!'+i.. S:': .il db i. .., .Lti. '�..r. ..,... ,. rR 1. ,. _.1 a. rs .�.,. ., s,„ f ♦ C s.- .. .,t: G ,«� s.....rq., ::t• ti.. '1 ,a. .�.... .. 't•`.,,r-.t......... Ya^ j'........ .._..-N_..:.� �� .: .. .: ....... .... „H:'., ....15.}4..✓1,.,- Y....,, iw..}. et. .>c ..�.. v-�rt.....s .Y..c,..:y.....w.t , ..:a :,, .1+..d,.1' a- b �.a::. .'t..y..r .r,v^'rti?�: ...,.. `t. .r. .....x n+. .� _ .,. ...... ,........ •, t.. Pak�,Y, 'a r •..� }.,, 5 Y -z.- .; _ - , { '` NOTICE'OF PUBLIC HEARING.,� ' ''' AFFIDAVIT O P LICATIO �.., AGENDAv�= £ r } t. s �.`.}-T.«x".'I'�r� �'.� i.S•'a'x `F 'v �� '��,}��}c Tigard,Plannrn� C°ammissiom'����,'� a w�'� '��`xi= .' April 6, 1976 -,`7:30 p,m.Y- . ,, ,;,; STATE OF OREGON .Twality Junior High School --Lecture n g*Q�n X r^ FaF''�- ris 9.b `,. a}�• x'� ,� 'c,' u'` Ss. ll COUNTY OF WASHINGTON 14650 SV�g 67th�A`ve};.Tigard,;©r:97223 r �` ;.,5. PUBLIC'HEARINGS- ,'_;+ s,,..a ,`,1y; ��w��5}1 ,PRELIMINAR�.�' RE�IEV7 ZC` � �� - _:._.x_---_•eJO a h.---S 13.i e.7 -.____ ___ ` _.__-_ �. E �.y it I _ _ 2.76(Kielgaard)f:, f� , 1.4`. a.t\ w A request by,Orland RJe gaard'forY. st;t a I am the publisher aelim.na lan°and iro ra review` being first duly. sworn, depose and. say that p . P k �'� p 1,,.,•µ. ',��? g �m�,', ;� '.4,"'„:11;5:;4'1.� l':V9felo'aprnent'in'proposed resfdentaal`planned"de l of The Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined n the snc nity of 137.714 H ''' l3l34,,`SV�,1101,.PIvd x,(4'Vash. Co"'tek `" l � map�2S1 2IZI3, tai lot 500)�` �''�' �.��',� i r�'�by ORS 193,010 and 193.020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and „,. - .x ,;(,tabled from IVlarch 2,,;15, meeting) � ��t,l w 5.2 ZONE'CHANGE:ZC 8'.75 (I'JPQ, i�'a state; that the legal notice, a printed copy of which.`is hereto annexed, was `Ito a3) ` a x`,ass TM .g . M.^ , ;,.-,. r, 1 ;'j n 2 frla" Re qust for app-ova.<of rezoning of 'published in the entire issue of said newspaper for _— __ successive and nds'within the 'boundaries'of:."NPO j y txtai Igo 3 Plan,;for Derry Dell Foot of gull .Wr consecutive weeks in the following issues _.-_____.. ._____ _________.____.____ _.___ }} M untain Area°'to conform• with the t�°\xx_. µ1-7t � 4 T+ �+A ?♦�'.ySh. }�,��{{ tl1 t� «y�ry` ,(y�1/y(®' adopted Comprehensive Plan,.:as%. ;�,, A�1 C 1 2 _ 1 d^ L L �il_C+Mw_ , amended .S:4,17. ' $.r"y 0 �•4.r. 'U � a•-,1t-• _ • 5.3 ZONING ORDINANCE:AMEND ' '.''''''C `. v' 1,...._IENT ZOA 2 76'".,':. ,,,. - #" °A pr opose amen in'en r tF a Tigard � 4 . � . gna�,i r � � \ , `zoning Code amending Chapter'18.20,. ;,. # „`�� 'to,include"a''''''n' evv'zoning elassiricat on; ;3 st for 3 dwellirz u "'`'`",2'V Subscribed and sworn.to before me this___.:.. .- -•_ _—.day of ,.�.,___ :' g ,_nits per acre(R-IO). '4 .. 5.4 ZONING ORDINANCE AMEND=. Y,r if Mc.NTL b �x � _,kfi N:":; A.request ytihe City,ol Tigard, ; M amendang the landscapang standards of, Y ' r f the Zoning Ordinance(Title 18,section , t ,/tit x'l`ZC- _�__ '18.58.050), requiring that security',be. i`41 t otary Publi of Oregon t"posted'with the Cityyx equal to 110% of r �' r � �x r ;a,the cost of the proposed landscaping aaA ` ., �, \},.n,,h y determined by the City Planning Direc-' yr� My commission expires W_-___ 1`�'� 19_ i'.for before the issuance of any buiidingl i, y , —. � "�:t'•---' ,a.. ..,. ,s 1e .�a"�,c!rµ' a:a3"t}o`' "'y 4 y Y .•- �r',t�1 �,.pe�-m5ts}�� „+w'= r'".a'c'�si,1 f'"��• ,a��y'r;"�:,aj} . � ��g�,. : 5 5,-CONDITIONAL, USE PERMITS ;,, 'CU 5;76(ICessi'rige'r) x;`'*??4s '”r ,, _i' „I S A\requests'by,Earl Kessi�nger for out-" " :'side storage of wood products:on a par- cel of land in an M-3 (light industrial) ,, . i .zone at I2560 SW;Hail Blvd ,(Wasp,Co. ' g` r,tax map 2S1 1BC,°tax lot 24011:" ""' '.,' " (ta�gib+led frog*�February 17'1976 meet-': g a t 5 . t5.6 FLOOD PLAIN FILL-�PERMIT M° ,7 }'t I-76(Barters r �a ":-"1 y%'''' r f; ' +\ s ;". '*A request for a'flood ,a n-fill ermit; '` to fill plan dsn.presently,situated,within;' '; ;, the 106'•ear flood lain located 660,ft 2; y 4 south of Bonita on 74th Ave. (Wash. Co.tax map 2S112A,tali-lots-1100 and 6 SU13DIVISTO.N ', 4r.,t�f.,: , o Iii15,� jv qr e r+r- '" t,, �q 6..;1-S 3.76<(Summerfield:Phase,ITT) °' „�i` k;;, 'request`for approval'of a prelitni- a '' ,nary plat;for Phase IV, Summer€ield .45 A„Planned Development,*located'east of~. 'v'''' 98thYbetw•dten SW:Sattler and Durham m '''''111`4.4`'''''''''''''''''''' fi sus 'Rd. (Wash. Co.'tax map 251;11C, tax K i:lots 1600, 1700,.2000.&.:2300;'tax asap f . ,7,. f•2S1 11D, tax lt,1ls 900' 00 and 1500)1,":"z ' _0 1^-,.''',:...-i'"?.?. n 7. MISCELLAN EOUS 5'� F`' t zip C Ail interpret.atior�of use to d'eterrnine ? , * 'whether a Shaklee Home P'roducts,d.'''{,I'i l tributorship and calesroonmE is s'irmlar'to; ;�,^ other"'outright permitted uses ii' the'. r C-3,geneial'corntnereial zone.¢,R7.s, �x (TT2657 --- Publish 3/25/76,4/1/76) `' } ar Iry '' s 70 =a ...,.,. 1 2.1 4 �.,.,;.�1*Z'.5,r a+,r.��, „�"$.}u S 1`.�n.#,. �j. y... F S x •1 ,tw,•s ti..'"'C:':..{.� ,;r}r..:7,... ,:......:: ”- -u4.,..un c....,;. M� fr _,^ .„,y.u5.' �t4.i4.s 4�^� ' r v t( d\ ,Y 1: e,,r.om.1i,r•. 0_4.•.\� 4.orus �..aa c r7,, _ -,>,,. c..,. ..>.. r�%..�P:.t?,,.�...r..'.�y.. -...r....-,". ..�,`...... : e:.t;.. . !. _..::. ,.. .• <,-.,..,. ..,,: � , �t1•vSh..,.,3?.k-c;�i sF?M1 �`,.>+«.It.+..`ta1N,.,_i�x u,.I. „•d..ru..w��l, 4 1.€u`� ..7s+.ai�„.xY w ..,r r-..,f�n�x.J��c.r t.�,i S Julu,w't r e,'i ."�,.•+x•a�aw�.k �,t�n,,.+ (t(` ,d- l'''''' u n 1 . NOTICE of PUBLIC HEARING"`' , '3K , AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICA °IO AGENDA..: om ; w'e �� Tigard PIannng C;ammissiori -,�y▪ +. . '' " April 6 1376'„ ,7:30'p.mr ',.,.. ,; A °}: STATE OF OREGON, ,Tvt:ality Junior High School :Lecture 4 1....."'"„,,...".:' ss, R oir 4 Ta `Y„ f ;,fi, t s:," , ','�dt COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ' Q ,-^ ; '' �} 14650 SV�g 97th Ave,Tigard,Or 97223�� t . 5.PUBLIC'llEARINGS w r iti'�'1,•,,.;n „-.41 t`r, �,� t:: '5'1 PRELIMIN .R; �i{Ei,I.K.y ZC,!f • S.C�`]>ir ,r E ',, I, - 2-,76 1.1<ecliellgat:%1 a,F ,, , 4 � •.tzr `' A Orland Kjelgaard'for r Y t 4Y' 1".''' k ;'' being first duly sworn, depose 'and say that I am the publisher _ M preliminary pl nand prograk review 1: > t of`a proposed r'esid ential-planned de_ imes a newspaper of general circulation, as defined �,.veiopment in'the vicinity,ofr 13778;,.f.:,i, of The Tigard T 13340 SV l•Iall:B t,d.+;(Wash, ';Co: to . �:, a w �� ma `2SI 2DD"`t-&x lot 500 '•mow `<» � '''.:''. by ORS 193,010 and 133.020', published at Tigard, in the, aforesaid county as.a p f 7 tm i�g � � � (tabled from March 2,1376, meeting) , i 5 2 ZONE CHANGE ZC 8-75 (NPO;1 ''''':".;•.".::„ ' copy lt0 3) ! .„- r(, > «. �. state; that the `legal notice, a printed co of which is hereto annexed was t ,>,p, ��, •�r � �, ak �•� ,,t ' ..�”w.en: �r�u.y-per r}•.t_3 �.♦. ?,�r..xrC....+F,+rr„.�...t.+. t`'x • for _ successive and o'within i pF i zoning of 't 2 t Re nest fora roda of re sr A� ublished in the entire issue of said newspaper r _ ti lands• _tbTyounc ries of"NPO P ,, '''''!..4*" i No. 3 Plan for',De l Foot'of Bull i ';` consecutive creeks in the following issues _-_.-_.._-_-- -__,:__-__- _.-,_.___ ___--.— , Mountain,Area„' to conform with the. adopted Comprehensive rr Plan,,as' • JC.�0.. �� i` r•a sE •p \Y w F�'"R'r at!LM1 �(Ci S __Ma ch ?: _and♦_A� '3.7. 4. 6 f amended .„ °x A . . ; _ 5.3 ZONII�T€',T ORDINANCE AMEND 3i x# ► •.,-./ ' EN'I'20A 2 76 b 9, .r« , per,{ K 37 '';::1\11- �x3r• H r °-; • v :ignati r ) A.`proposed' i ienr1mLnt ow the Tigard {s 'zoning Code; arnendirig Chapter 18,201.' *<i , , to include a`Flew zoning'`classification, Subscribed and sworn'to before me this .-_--.. 1St_________--- day of _.-_.,ter 4�for 3 dwelling units per'acre(R-10). ,r 7';:"".`: 5.4 ZONING ORDINANCE AMEND... $',i z �, t ' A 76 tfi s rid 7 A request y e Ctty,ol Tigard,.{ ''''I''''''; . Y . _._ R 1': amending•the`lartdccaping standards of qty Ja a Zoning Ord}}Hance Title 18,section :'.::'''':.:::***"' J / . �� .l __ _ _ 0), requiring that security be ih -----_- - _ (3.58,05 -_- - otary Publi of Oregon t.,posted with.the City,;equal to_110% of, the cost of tine proposed landscaping as, Yk! r ,. !. determined by the City Planning Direc-w• 4 for before tlae issuance of any building'' :1'1'4"\''''''.' a' My commission expires __ -C11 !-- -:--- p ermits /.•,'• , „ �� ,, h�Y y{t k p • +"1'.",t t�r r:i$�r w`5� ir:�{� Lq�-� �' I/ { 5.5 CONI}ITlt�htAL USE PERMIT' ':.1:;•'�nr CJ 5-76(Messinger) „, �r ., , w , 1 ' A request,by Earl Kessingera for out 1�'''Y A' side storage of,wood products♦on a par- '' cel of land in-an M-3 (light industrial) ';.,V'4:','.'' tr::.:zone at 12560 SwHall Blvd•(W*,sli)�Cu. Yd tE 4 . tart map 2S1'1BC, tax lot 24 11:''"' •' F'`r (tabled fron' February '7,r�1916�,meet=. 5l a5 in0)... •p l,, r; °4,�2yt`,,,.', 4v. M�'i: