Loading...
ZOA2-75 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. t '4 F ';';+,1.',',.;,..:,,...,,,,.,,,•,:','1 4 71/.(12 f'�1 �,., ,1A:1. t i( y {,�} ; r,. .,'' . , y ',4,.,,,,,,v,7,1,;.,- ,(• 4. A+ty t `�. I, <•.felt �., �l'l 4 (ll+k Y1. T„} y 1°,°41 4 ' }S 1. ''..1„ ',4,?• � {ti, S 1 S a'. � ;1',,,,10•441,,,,..1f,,"( I 5r1,F '„'i{yy .1 14 yx rA, 4., ' , Pt ,sli ':: ' �1' ,fit 1 t T. . G 44!'., 4t�. 1's, e. • t 1,Cl l F?b',,,ArV y tl ( y dei 4 ;la l( pS {I �' 1 '. .,,,,.!Vi.!-'4',,A, j ,. /,S!',;✓4t{yrS! F ,a,., { 4t_ r r �.� (' ti.r� 5 . • h r ;.:,�-..,«.,rx>� «.,,�.n.,., „.«. �h....:: ,r.,M1w- 1 t, Na.�a�� rua.� •v,«x nvae.x�a,l .rk 4 ,,,.,,.,;,4..„-,L,;.-., t xA.&k ,.. _ s {e„ 4,,, ,:,f,xh` V„,1,x,1:4,4"!,,.(•}+,?'.?t?",.r"."tf. 4,,.,fir,. y,'�1� ..,YYy1 17fi1I:•r5,y'Jn.;,R :4 F'ns�fl y„,.:0,1',.., ,:rif!{,lij,l,r, lrl,:,:, .�1 lrr }ryF q gY,.3 Lli�'.�. ►e ` \A” � � �, ��.�. ..�, .-_an., ��.� - is ,. .,. .. ,:..,...m ._ ,...W....., .... ...... , ..,. , ,.. • 1t+Yk. '} '(• �`{ w.., `"`' (Cu FOR MULTIPLE FAMILY HOUSING -- ��� �& SIGNS) 4 �({ 4 G !.:)(�� j,R��A,l J ti 1 hJ4,k y�+wt �',1';',,;(:1:':',1:.' 4.,i'.f�1 X1..'`13 t7,i �'N 51',�',�.�.,�': z� R��•e Rlr, '7 ,`' Zone Ordinance Amendment t ZOA 2--7S)' rrt ( ; Rin' e4 a,. fli, j +1 X ,ls 711" 'l P tr 1 11 v ! • e,I v'4 t w F LI ,,_ 0% f 'f:', t 0.114, +Y^' o yi !a, to r0, { {Y 6 a , 111.1 a41 rye 1.1. ti,4 P 11,11 �e�sewr�nri.erviewd�r,.t�uwsnialyle'a�sw:.ar4d:amlr.wwm.watew, prFo 1(^^; ',CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON +; •, ORDINANCE No. 75- '57 4jt ,14 LADING THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 18.40, r, 1�,` AN ORDINANCE AMENDING i'.?', COMMERCIAL-PROFESSIONAL ZONE (C-P) WITH RESPECT TO CONDITIONAL USES I 444'¢; AND ALLOWABLE SIGNS; PRESCRIBING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND DECLARING 'p°u AN EMERGENCY ?p v \'; C THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: , Section 1: The City Council finds that pursuant to Chapter 227. 0R8 ir;Y `- _ and Ordinance No. 701-32 -- "City of Tigard ZoningHE CITY 4,4 OF of 1970" the hereinafter stated amendments to said zoning "r ordinance, after due and legal notice, were submitted to public hear- . ing by thCity Planning Commission on May 6., 1975, and to the Coun-- 14 j r ; cil thereafter recommended that said zoning ordinance be amended as t'; hereinafter set forth. , `t finds that after due and legal notice g ,,h'' a public, hearing n was held by the City Council on July 14, Section 2: The Council further �'p 1975, whereat all interested persons were afforded an opportunity to ",:; ' a _respect thereto, and conditions precedent fulfilled i be heard with 94 ith respect to the following amendments to the Cityts zoning ordain- 4., ance. ' O'' Section 3: The Council further finds that the purpose for these amend.- � mems is to protthe amendmentscservehealth, to implement the , saidCityts welfare; and furthermore t?k objeotives and policies concerning commercial development as stated in the Tigard Community Plan. „,4i44'4, r tiF ,,', Section 4: That Chapter 1.8.40, Commercial-Professional. Zone (C-P), be `1'4 amended to read as follows: (underlining identifies addit- ions): ,' 18.40 O11 Conditional uses. In this zone the following ` r,'y uses and their accessory uses are permitted as conditional uses when '�' in accordance with the procedureal requirements of Chapter 18.84: M1 ! , . 1 Governmental structures or land uses; , t,of " 2 and night clubs; ," �Lounges g � 3 Medium rise apartment or office buildings (four ,' stories or above); ,.','Y. Motels and Notes; '' (5) Multi-family..dwellings,. aubect to the regulations and site restrictions of Ch. 18.24. rw., 6 Restaurants; ,'1, 1, 7 Theaters; . 8 Limited commercial uses if integrated within office `' parks incl tuding confectioneries' barber er shops t ,ri beautyshos delicatessens, pharmacies, florist shopa ." s ,I"? fhops, shoe repair shops; r;, (9) Similar uses if approved by the Planning Commission ,', (Ord. 7267 §l, 1972). ,t. ,'•4 18 40.070 Signs 44, . , . (a) There shall be not more than one square foot of sign area �,; ( _ hundred square feet of floor area. within the �' for each one , builJ ceed fifteen square be ldent ;�'iec1+ No sign shall e�- or dingssqre feet in site unless approved under , building p••aragraUhs "CI' or "F" below, '" ,i. CROINANCE Noe 7��...a2 ' .,.,..;i.. gdsra!sil, ,. ... ,.., �'� !�('JJ ����i rnrwrn».«�+�ikw•+: wwnn 4', i w., ., c. ^! :L+ , .1 I', ,•, ,r 1 r � (b) No sign shall project above the roof '1,-he or extend over a 't;', , Public sidewalk or right-of-way. All faces of signs shall be parallel to the face of the building upon which the Ch': sign is located and rte ,which the sign pertains: r1,„ l' , a.gn (c,) asay mbe pai nted or otherwise applied directly to_l ' wall providing such sign is an integral part of building; v,', design and approval is obtained for such sign from the ,I,':,: Design. Review Board. (d) The sign may.be lighted with indirect lighting. No neon t ��` (exposed tubing), plastic (interior illumination), blink- 1,, ' ,,.. er, flashing or animated signs shall be permitted. Cu 'n . (e) No billboards or "incidental use signs" shall be permitted. ( ��,` f) Free-standing sign& designating a .particular project site or building may be permitted in lieu of building mounted 'es' signs subject to..s•ecific_a•.roval b _..the Design Review II Board._.. 2. Signs in a Planned Development District (under provisions of Ch. ,' 18.56) for thespecific purpose of site identification, build identi:fication, tenant identification and traffic direction may rix be permitted in such Planned Development District as approved in ,d therGdeneralvPlanSc eon 18.56.030) subject to Design Review aPP " providing that an integrated sign theme is carried .,k,; out compatible with the overall development and: consistent with ix the approved General Plan and Program. Section 63 Inasmuch as it is necessary for the peace, health and , safety of the people of the City of Tigard that the zoning matters as hereinabove forth be established with the least possible delay to therebycurrentlymaintain the legislative in c integrity . City's .zoning � emergency p hereby ;', declared tofexiStand this ordinance shall be effective upon its trt enactment by the Council and approval by the mayor. p.. '` PASSED: By tIlhdt.tmcitks vote of all Councilent, after ori members r7 res ' 1 read dayof cx. by number and title only, this r,° being three ti des 1975• g t.y. 4 .5 r, . - e._,/_(.",..,e, , ,_.,..„/ ;, ' ,i ,-rein Recorder : City of Tigard f" ' APPP.ov'DD By the mayor, this _)irk 'day of ::::-/.111,i . . 1975 kri q . ,rYr 1 ,;,; Mayor - City of Tigard r tt O. , , oINANCN No. 75-�s' ,, Page 2 ,; 1 71-rk' y i r 4° 1 r " . r Y ° r i Y K r . . - r.t.Y ravrP'rN"-""T't'..fu.. .i "`. 1Y 'n"'"1".. •' n, .,� ! a- ; kt; sA�?j 1111 • Ie,l ilGh r u CITY COUNCIL }+{ Faa1 ICMq ILLfJ. W!b'b Dml Caul t'CW Yom) OMV MY IrC- Yt+9 Iw- Hlya W1 REGULAR MEETING JULY 14,, 1975, 7:30 P. M. A,5 1. ROLL CALL: o . A. Chiefp; of Police; C. B rkurst, John E. Cook, Robert C. .Maore WilburRBAdams, Councilmen Ralph'D. Bailey, Legal Counsel; db ,_ f��3s Russel Austin, Building Official; Dick Bolen, Planning Director; Bruce P. Clark City Administrator. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Special Meetings June 18, 26, 30, July 8, 1975 I}' ` Regular Meeting June 23, 1975 t>3 • (a) Mayor Bishop requested that the minutes of June 30 be amended to reflect that, moneys for BOR 'Grant were provided at the suggestion of the Mayor and with Council ,tr�F �';"' Concurrence, q`, Motion to approve all minutes as amended: Councilman Barkhurst, seconded by Lw: Councilman Cook. i,ktYi Approved by unanimous vote of Council. y„�a, Iy S. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS ty� c City Administrator commented on each of the written communications: ' „ (a) Reminded Council of the meeting on the CRAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). � q 4/,`„: g regarding g(b) Study of the League of Oregon Cities information re ardin 1975 legislation was set _.. '1;� over for a future study session. f`'1” (c) Communication from Tri-County Community Council (T-'CCC) was read and Mr. Jerry Burns addressed the Council from the audience in regard to that item requesting Council endorsement. laison between the Ir citizen to act as a assessment study and Moti.on byCouncilman Barkhurst the Cityendorse the needs �� tp ,,}r;{ attempt to locate a Councilman Cook. Motion ty Community Council 4,„1 and the City of Tigard; seconded bypassed unanimously. (d) A Memo from the Chief of Pnlic(' regarding Frewing Street parking was held for consideration under Other Business later in the meeting. • 4‘ (e)(e) Carps of Engineers anPublic t �� rcrossing session a£ the erida,Tualatin Rive, Vias requested to be c ained ona future study agenda. In,="4i ►«,,' 4. CALL TO AUDIENCE ~OR THOSE DESIRING TO SPEAK ON NON-AOENDA ITEMS -;) No one desired to speak from the audience. : 5, APPROVAL OP EXPENDITURES & INVESTMENTS: 11.21t27 ;�^i; (a) City Administrator noted that these bills represented payment from the last fiscal t year. (b) Motion to adopt: Councilman Cook; seconded by Councilman Barkhurst. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. a+, x,• ' r 1 '',„,.•,;i,:••• -,,, . i:1,.... . Irfic ,,','Fiv.;., • - • - ' . . . . , ,„,,,,•,,,,,, . A 60 APPEAL PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION - CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST .. "4)N (Nine-T-Nine Towing Service/ Gene Dooley) AR L (a) Motion by Councilman 8arkhurst that a public hearing be set for July 28•,, 1975, 8:00 P. M*; seconded, by Councilman Cook. Motion passed by unanimous vote. 7. APPEAL - TIGARDWATER DISTRICT OFFICE ADDITION TO TIGARD FIRE STATION - DESIGN REVIEW y, -,, ''',;;•"-t.,:: BOARD ACTION .:4,f,• . , (a) Motion by Councilman Moore that a public hearing be set for July 28, 1975, 800 P. M.; seconded by counctIman'parkhurst. Motion passed by unanimous vote. .. YA 8. ACCEPT AND AUTHORIZE EXECUTION SANITARY SEWER AGREEMENT - Joseph t. & June W. Poitras, Yi!..'irt 10515 6. W. Johnson Street, Tigard, Oregon '''• i',,4',•, . (a) City Administrator advised CoOncil that this propertY was located outside the City. They were experiencing Problems with the septic tank at that property and desired to i,..,•,,;•i, connect to the sanitary sewer. System and that by accepting and authorizing the . ri :••'p,,, execution of the Sanitary Sewer Agreement,Cquncil would set Up the conditions under which the connection cold be made. Conditions include non-remonstrance to •,,,••,,,,,,,,,:i annexation. (b) Motion to adopt: Councilman Mote, seconded by Councilman Cook, !i ,,,,04,,,,,, ,•• rit,f,? Approved by unanimous vote of Council, •-,,,•,,,Ii-:. , ,, ..•,. , 0. ACCEPT AND APPROVE SUBDIVISION COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT - ANPUEWOOD II '•,•,4••:,. L . : t:111.: (a) city AdminiStrator recommended that thiS. standard Subdivision Compliance Agreement 1.4 form be accepted and execution authorized. . (b) MbtiOrt by Councilman Cook to accept and approve subdivision Compliance Agreement and „.. , authorize Mayor and Recorder to execute 8aMet seconded by Councilman Madre. •'.•' Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 0.) , 10. RESOLUTION No, 75-38 RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNOZ4. AcCEPTIN6 THE PUBLIC IMPROVE- MENTS CONSTRUCTED WITH PUBLIC RIOHT;':OF-WAY ON 8, W. 115TH AVENUE, FROM S. W. GAARDE TO A POINT 87 FEET, MORE OR LESS, NORTHERLY THEREOF 1•, (a) City AdminiStratOr toted that portion of 115th from Gaarde St. to a point 857 feet .51f. northerly thereof was improved by adjacent developers as A condition 0..e approval of L eheir subdivision, that the street had beet inspected and the Public Works Dept. recommended that the City accept the street. ., (b) Motion by Councilman Moore that Resolution. No. 15,..48 be adopted; seconded by ,. ..• Councilman Barkhurst. c'•'..i .. •,,,''..,•' Approved by UnaniMOUS vote Of 00Undil. ,,,:,•,, ,, •,,:lo , „..::::; 11, kESOLUTION No, 75.50 RESOLUTION OF CITY COUNCIL ACKNOWLEDGING• RECEIPT oP TRIPLE MAJORITY 'A- ANNEXATION AND RECOMMEND PoRWARDING To pogT14Alqb METROPOLITAN, AREA LOCAL COVERNMENT tOUNDARY COMMI8810N. r. 8. W. Osmptot 8treetnAthexatiot. .. , ,,i.•,',•:•,.i; - .... , PAGE 2 . oouNOIL 1tNflT18 JULY 14, 1015 ,.,., •••,..•;,,,, , ,..,:';,,,.,•.•:•:-'•-.•i'-•'•:-•••.',..,,.,,,-;,,,, ,•••,,4.,;,4;,,..4,':,,;4-2.•., ,;:,;,.4„;,,,,,'-,,,i-,,,,,;•:,,,;;ttitaa.giliiti.iiiittirtikiillitt,. -...„1,1tditittithaiditio.taisitakiiiting--—Lommiairilt,--,,:,%. ,.,•'-•,'-i;',--,,;,,,'-....,,,,-,2',,,, ,,::-',,:',;;,:,,,,,,i',',::,.,,.: tli yy St ly Jr' (a) Planning Direo,or aad .,eCOU fded that the dt, ann,exationprifition f!orwa-d�d ��y $�-<�- 'K.2wr.p.Aitar:.Bt,undary Review Cnmm.issi,t:,n. City Administrator voted it was 144t!' C,-un, .11. policy on annexation. (b) Motion by Councilman Barkhurst to ade.pt R,eso:4"1 tion No. 75.39; seconded by Councilman Cook. Approved by unanimous vote of council.. 12. RESOLUTION No. 75-40 A RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO THE CITY OF PUEBLO, COLORADO AND IN PARTICULAR FRED E. WEISBROD, CITY MANAC4EiA. AND E. L. WILLOUGHBY, CHIEF OF POLICE, FOR A.°, ASSISTANCE RENDERED BY THE PUEBLO POLICE DEPARTMENT IN CONNECTION WITH A TASK FORCE STUDY AND REPORT ON THE TIGARD POLICE DEPARTMENT. (a) City Administrator recommended that Resolution Nod 75-40 be adopted. 4, (h)(b) Motion to adopt: Councilman Cook; seconded by Councilman Moore. qfh Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 13. NPO #1 & #2 REZONING - CITY OF TIGARD Request by City of Tigard for approval of rezonif landsiPhin for oundaries of the NPO #1. Plan for the Ash Avenue Downtown Area andN #2the Greenburg- Brookside Area to conform with the adopted Ccmprehensive Plan as amended,, Request v; approved by Planning Commission. 'F{; Public Hearing was opened at 5:00 P. M. It was noted by theMayor that there, were two NPO areas proposed for rezoning. and "fk,• that each one would be handled separately atdor the public hearing. (a) The City Planner explained the proposed rezoningtobring the e zoning into conformance "?: with the adopted plan. He pointed out that no land was being considered for rezoning to a more intense use at this time. The only rezonings proposed were those which ,r s, were necessary to protect the integrity and carryout the objectives of the plan. ll 4 Testimony by proponents. No testimony Cross Examination by Council :., The testimony on NPC #1 was co eA deo. • (b) Rearing on proposed rezoning ;w J NPO #2 c e7ed " . the pr P 4 „,zrningo and displayed a map ind ca LKN �g Planning Director explained .�� �.���:•. ,�,�r „r� .. � � r the location of the proposed rezcn.i:tgs. N'ted .yat a question had been raised about outright versus conditional 4=eA► ,Yx ty.i s Legal Counsel. advised the City ,ri� . Council. that in his opinionopinionthe zoning t"t i�:�d�rl.a,aC.� , e should be clarified by virtue of an amendment clearly delineating Council policy and the rights of conditional uses as affected by changes in the zoning text or zone designations. Testimony b...y proponents. No testimony.PAGE 3 4.4 COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 14, 1975 ".• W W W. s Kwnx. ur ./ ?'v. r .iz•n' r.SRnW >,n.w-r^fn a•:t>xwm;'i"+,m,m, .MNa*..i,.r r•r*r•.nf ,R 1 }l i'9 1 ttezwr,.a"i,—,.. i 4 ... - - . _ . n'l f'Y '222 y ."' 24,t v the grandfather -zights of p.lf-exishing conditional uses for '...E- Piovni.:1,„° . ea.-: ..1,,,,,st. consideration; seconded by Councilman Barkhurst. .. Approved by unanimous vote of the Council. (h) Motion by Councilman Barkhurst to adopt ordinance No. 75-36; seconded by Councilman Cook. T: , (i) Motion by Councilman Moore that the plan be amended by leaving the Walnut to Johnson ...J o. Street area as it is presently zoned. The motion died for lack of a second. lot ,,. (j) Attorney Fred Anderson requested a statement by the Council that demonstrated 1.. approval or concurrence with the ordinance which was requested to be drawn to prott,,,, t , grandfather rights. :.., Attorney Bailey stated that such a statement would be appropriate. No action was ' taken by the Council although there appeared to be concensus of Council along the :41 lines requested. , t (k) Motion to adopt ordinance No. 75-36 as approved by unanimous vote of the Council. ,7 '6 1,4, APPEAL - PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION - G. M. Bonn & Kenneth Bunn ;., ) Request for approval of a zone change from R-7 (single family residential) to R-7 Planned li Development, and for preliminary plat approval for an 8.5 acre, 70 dwelling unit (two .,- family house). Planned development proposed to the south of S. W. Murdock Street, and .',.:,. d extening north along S. W. 109th Avenue to S. W. Canterbury Lane. (Tax Lot 8800, T , -..1", Washington County Tax Map 281 10AD). Application denied by Planning Commission. , Public Hearing opened 8g00 P. M. 4, tt (a) Planning Director noted that the Council packets contained minutes and Staff Report, , .tt . utilizing proposed plan of development, aerial map and slides the Planning Director outlined the facts of the situation. Testimony by proponents Mr. Jack Armand requested the Council table the appeal request. Mr. Bunn advised „t t, Council that if the original county approved PR approval is in effect that they would like the application for their appeal withdrawn. If it is not in effect then , they request the Council Lc table this appeal request. Testimony by opponents Mrs. Davenport spoke in opposition to the proposal and stated she did no /art trees , cut and houses on adjacent property at a high density. (b) Motion by Councilman Barkhurst that the hearing be continued and the appPA1 , be tabled as per the applicant's request; seconded by Councilman Cook, COVetr4 4'1 ' Barkhurst noted that the purpose of the motion was to allow staff time tc ?, more factual information on the status of the county approved PA desigra .ur e., The vote was 4-0 in favor of the motion, hence, the item was tabled. Council ed that staff he prepared to report on the status of the county PR appro,vr.1 a ) next study session ! 15, AMENDMENT TO gONINO oRDINANct Proposed amendment to the zoning otdinande of the City of Tigard with retlpent. i+-0, PAdt 5 m COUNCIL MINUTES .., JULY 14, 1975 ir . , . .-. ':,', t=t7. t:atlada," +:4 eltalitrati221401/151, ,w•-4., ',f#,•• , V‘ 1* .... ,., , Commercial-Proie,,,,,, Lona,1 Zone te-P. Capte,,4' ,,,8.40) Tigard Municipal,. C.,ode a ,t,' itlIg allowable sign type F and sizes and to permit multir-family dwelLings of less than 4 StOtleSo .4,1 Public Hearing oper_ed 8s00 P. M. (a) Planning Director explained the ordinance and its purpose. The Building Official noted that the ordinance does not address real estate signs which is a separate 6 problem. ,.. (b) Testimony of proponents , Mr. John Flattery, Lincoln Properties, Inc. , appeared and spoke in favor of the i ordinance. 4, No cross examination. There being no one further to be heard the Hearing was Closed. i'k4! (c) ORDINANCE No. 75-37 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 18.40, COMMERCIAL-PROFESSIONAL ZONE (C-P) WITH RESPECT TO CONDITIONAL USES AND ALLOWABLE SIGNS; PRESCRIBING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND „t „. . DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. .. ..; 0 Ordinance was read 5 times by title. , .'‘ (d) Motion to adopts Councilman Moore; seconded by Councilman Cook. ,' e ,, 1 Approved by unanimous vote of Council. :! 4 4...44., (e) Motion by Councilman Moore to remand the real estate signs issue to the Planning and .,, Zoning Commission for their consideration as soon as possible with particular emphasis t on allowing C-P requirements in the sign code rather than the zoning ordinance; „t ",.. seconded by Councilman Barkhurst. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. t, .'. 16. 0.L.C.C, APPLICATION D. A. LICENSE , , Curtis Luckey, Inc. , 14455 S. W. Pacific Highway (Former Flemings Coach House). , . .i (a) It was recommended by the Chief of Police that the license be forwarded to the 0.L.C.C. with an affirmative rectml,or.datton. m (b) Motion by Councilman Cnok that the request be forwarded to O.L.C,C. $4.,.c, q,,,,,-( by 41 Councilman Barkhurst. f .*, Approved by unanimous vote of Cz)utcili, ''' ..,,, 4,e , 17. OTHER BUSINESS ,I4 (a) City Administrator noted the knformatic,n on necessary appointments tc trar4 a Committees, , ch) Council instructed staff to have an ordinance prepared for the nest study sew.qtrei " which would prohibit parking an Prewitg Street in accordance with the recomttitriq of the Chief of Police. -, 4 ,4 (o) Councilman Moore inquired about requesting Bob Gray,' Tigad Industrial Park, to oia.. :..... \ ,., ?AC t 6 m, COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 14, 1975 ' -..'..........°' 44. '4 1.1 1'44 4'41''''''''''111,1"'''C14.''441444''1'.1 1'1'1'14'''''11 '4'14 1'4"144P.illEMZE=AMX2122=2252=rit'aintitt4 4000 H04. . 4.10.000 0 ‘, I 4• # `, „ ' 4,.4 ,4 .44.4 4 ' 4,4 s'1 , 4 ,' 1 ji i r2 q 1. ,k a stop sign a°: the driveway ,.xl. i- V e _ , ,, ":".A)-eni:i. ,- :se.° =esd f,' u 'S't7' 'h '1r �" ,1 a 'F+ b"`. ,:15 s" "� IC-'1 ,,,,.... . «v t'� 1'4 Ail « Wil with people 'no`t stopping as t e. s,-,�,,_'�,E,�. :;.k.1. ., '�,>,''Yca :.; t. ,r.'-Il ay. r' Y a (d) Mayor Bishop observed that two z 4Y�:.Y �,{ryM ,nr �'" .4'... '!rs'.r.e,li ria,:!. e passel ea".rii,e' inthe 44, „E, e on a previous contestedIt4,s evening without removing emergencycYlal as was tY..,Ye . ,,:,' ordinance and 'he also read a letter from real estate agent for `ecDrrna;Ld°s and t^; ` r Jack Robertson which requested a meeting on the lea th and inquiY, as to why a _ held and wh�� the Ma �:,r was not notified. ,�; rA special. meeting wasy Mir .1 d:, 18. EXECUTIVE SESSION if k';', Council voted to go into executive session to discuss a personnel action by the City /`; L Council. The Council discussed a request by an employee for amendment to the salary ,4' " rate. Council. requested recommendation of City Administrator and accepted same. yn 4: business to come before the Council, meeting was adjourned. ,!_ A X L 19 No further : (''''& -4-4/t..4 ,,. ', b �f ..�c..,�.. ..c.w+.+w�.>...w. ,,'...,,,,,,,E,. a 4,t, City Recorder Pro-Tem I 1r Cyt r t111 ,1°', ,e, f (7 Mayor ,e ..}' } t Ilx14 r 4'. / I t, 1„ a 10 MI YI z, I alai : y iJr 1t f IA'y '.1 : .. COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 14 1975 r "I..M: r: ,?51 MCnmP'm'.rW""1 .:1"1 .... w „1.m n4}, k.i-,1.+ 'am w+iNt M .,,., /14 1 r."•;Ij r"'.K Y, ;'. t rn. YttlYf'uk'A'FYadn;;Yar.Mr14..Wd',,..HWkN,/,'FF 7�,7, rwS"k...:. M'.rNN+"'-.7'a' :�'. � .r�'.`yy,"!'k.&...'p.Pl 5 i14�„1{W !.. �j4�{^M!�'mf ,... .]Mf^lbl'1?'1�'1 i.1.-.:. tl w 1;!. ,'..i 1 " • .A I.... .1. .1- «fr_ yygg at• ux ; ., R 7i jr t fr rrx .A p �k y �r�� jp r FtS ` 1t ,1w�4 n,�,,; MINUTES Tigard Planning Commission May 6, 1975 - Regular Meeting �k! Twality Junior High School -- Lecture Room 14650 S. W. 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon 1. CALL TO ORDER ri 1r: Chairman Whittaker called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Comn sPopp, Porter,sioners present: Ball, Hansen, �Sakata, Wakem, Whittaker. Staff represented by Powell and City Attorney Anderson. 3. MINUTES The minutes of the April 15, l97 , meeting were considered. - Wakem asked that they be amended to show that at item 4.2 he had abstained and that item 4,3 had been tabled by a 5 to 4 vote, The Minutes were then approved as read:. COMMUNICATIONS i r o Staff asked that the agenda be amended to delete items M4.3 and 4.4. 'r Xtx 4 i o Chmn. Whittaker discussed the Council's actions with respect tt to those revisions of the C-�3, general Commercial Zone, . . by g The Commission recommended the Planting Commission. fl" ' coricensus was to ask that the additional provisions (separating the Main St. zoning from Pacific Hwy, zoning ,,p, and the 750 ft. distance from schools for high traffic Planting generators) �`�e set for hearingat the next F�.ann�,n C . .,:. arra mission meeting. in ' , o Ball moved to schedule future hearings for 7:30 instead of 8:00, seconded and carried. � available, o $alb. asked thatopinion be aa to the Planting Commissionoon�the ecentcou t made., e, � court cases of Culver v, Dag (Appeals) t and faker v. Milwadkie (Oregon Supreme Court) . Whittaker directed that a presentation by the City Attorney be agendized for the next meeting. o affpre�en ea memorandum from the Public Works Dept, t.to the Planning Commission concerning the U. S. Postal Service Euildir4g now under constructor on SW Main St t ,:,r r/ F,.. y '.r rGi.. k+t rm.rvgr�ew^+•r^er-1"td+a +61•««whaw^ya,14't Y^T'1'T HM L , +s 9n1M'mf•Y r«xm M'*n`1 rntiyUa to+hAcr.¢ ,1. ;'R � , ° wyMC s..ntilekesatcN 'amu,." a,:uyr. 'Fkw h,rznµ+""+c^,c!IiMM ,,;ma, r+ !� Y !tr` tL xb < r _. ,or '1 . r , , II,'• .. U :.•*,,i'.. . '''?.t.'T',:°‘ .•, Staff explained that public works was asking the Commission's P. recommendation for the improvement of SW Scoffins Street H ,.,.„,.., adjacent and contiguous to the rear delivery entrance to .7 the Postal Service Building. Commission discussion centered on why this matter had not been previously addressed by public works or the Planning Dept. Staff explained that the ,. ,e.,-,••, ,•,:.•),'i, post office had not applied for any review of the project . •i't;.,.,• and the first official contact had recently occurred with t.,.,$,1.• respect to this particular problem. The contact had occurred when the City had required a street opening permit. Porter 14', , 'f'•';',. moved to table the matter, directing staff to discuss it •.,„ with the Postal Service. Second (Wakem) , carried. ) J I 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.1 Zoning Ordinance Amendment ZOA 2-75 •. A proposed amendment to Sections 18.04.011 (conditional uses) and 18.40.070 ( ,ins) in the chapter dealing with the Commercial- .,3 Professional zone. , ., Commissioners Wakem and Ball announced they felt they had a con- ,. fliot of interest and asked the chairman's permission to abstain .,, from participation in discussion and voting on this amendment. ...,,i, 'r• Chairman Whittaker granted that permission. ..., ti..! A. Staff Report .;':,,' • , ,i.,... Powell read staff findings and the proposed text changes .•,..,,, with an alternate wording of 18.40.070 (1) (a) . ‘,..., B. Public Testimony .4.. , o Lynn Wait 1 em (representing Farmers nsLi rance Corp. ) '.;-.. said that the company had studied the proposal and favored it. .'„ o Bill Flattery (Lincoln Properties) stated that he felt the proposed ordinance amendment was still not •,,-1 adequately addressing Lincoln Propertiesneeds. 0 Bill McMonagle asked if variances would be necessary ' ., in order for a developer to exercise his options ,,,,;•?:, Under paragraphs requiring Design RevieW Board approval. 0 Staff said that variances would not be necessary for the forseeable project. C. Commission biscussion and Action o Sakata moved, to adopt as amended. ,k • y, o Seconded by Popp. Motion catried, Hansen against. ,1 Pd Minutes '.1 May 6, 1975 - page 2 ,.. ....., , t.. ? • , et,,,.,rnp,,,o-ro,r,,fm•4.,t^vr-,,,,—,r,,r,,,,,,,,,, ,--rri.,,,,,,—trv,-,,,--,;rr., ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,e,n4,,,,,,,,,,,,,..4-44,,,40,,,,,8,...**,,,,,,34,..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,:' • ., ",,,, ,:',:•l'•„",,A.,, ,. -",,,, ,t ,' 1,,It'd.:,,,q•',,' ,;"-„,',• - 'T' --. ,}� , , dkp sr`;' 1° , 1 I; itij , ,., 4.2 Conditional Use CU 7-75 (Randall Construction) , 0 The applicant was not present and this item was re-tabled Y to May 20, 1975. 5. PRELIMINARY PLAN AND PROGRAM '„, Concept review for Dunn/Donn/Annand project - previously known t',. as Canterbury Planned Development - westerly of SW 109th Ave ,tL' and southerly of SW Murdock St. 1 A, Staff Report Staff findings vu e read by Powell. tBe . Applicant's Presentation , 1 o JerryDragoo (Robert Meyers Engineers and Planners) , ,,,. presented the concept plan. He observed that the ',:* developer hadconsidered reactivating the old. "PR” conditional use but had taken a fresh approach in- ,, stead in this .a. lication pp . • d Ken Bunn, a principal in the project outlined the • <{w history of the project from the time of its original MF conception. yC. Concept Plan Review 4r o Sakata asked if provision had been or would be made , ,rR, for play area or public park. T 1 '''P` sked about surroundin zoning and about i i ��i Portes. a g ', edisting development and probable future develop- , .i• meat around the site. j+l o Popp asked if the R-7 zone would allow the density rl proposed. Y t ,, o Ball asked that a written narrative description of •the project's history, as verbally entered by Mr. f Y Dunn, be provided the commission. 0,' o Sakata asked if the cult-de-sac shown was of legal ;.' length and asked that the preliminary plat be sub- � ted the General Plan and Program. t' mi � with "r', o Bail said that he didn't feel there: was sufficient I• p information about the . ro ject or sufficient infor-- r4; mation on the Comprehensive Plan for this area to • , judge conformance with that plan and that he could r. not support approval of the "oonceptu involved under those circumstances. e t. Nit PC Minutes - May 6 y 1975 - page ,4.0:? Y .o..., :,,., r,,C{^:r ,w9 ,yn`oq"['llMM" .�" Y°Hir,'''/�.1t,';'^rr+i y .,,,,,..,.wµ.y,my1",r*" "*"p"^r, «r'e�M7tjm,msm.}�k°,�"h.e,pN�{ca�fst �.a� ,!O^ wrvPPo ..,d.y�"^'"i'^m,:�. rtiY,u. , ^�,+ �,� ,`��'!Y .., :*... �..,iv4i... ;Mt V> 4, } Addendum to Exhibit A ZOA 2-75 Alternate proposed for wording of 18.40.070 (1) (a) There shall be not more than one square foot of sign area for each one hundred square feet of floor area ' within the building or buildings to be identified. s� shall exceed � esquae feet in size unlesapproved undersu�par g subparagraphs "C" or "F" below. • • • ,r . fi .. r Pd t i e8 :. May 6, 1975 - page ..r.tt*,ywrrywsyrr,pxpy,.y.»..dh •p w +-^J_,.�rTw'�•+`^'•N�.}�r M.1.kr..+'rwmmr :ffitt:i nY.".K'auaT+1NN1.rt.Y:w:�4wbmiAjwA"W..�wrFGn i%w4'�: o Tigard Planning Commission Staff Report May 6, 1975 Agenda Item 4.1 LOA 2-75 ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT A. Section 18.40.011, Conditionals uses allowed in the Commercial- Professional zone district Objectives: 1. to permit development under a conditional use permit of multiple family dwellings of less than 4 stories 2. to, conform with the objectives of the Tigard Community Planfor a residential-commercial area with respect to housing mixture 1 Present Ordinance Provisions: Section 18.40.011 6 3 allows "medium rise apartment or office buildings (four stories or above) " Proposed amendment: Add to Section 18.40,011 a new subsection: "Multi-family Dwelling", subject to the regulations and site restrictions of Ch. 18.24 ., r E. Section 18.40.070, Signs in the Commercial-Professional zone district Objectives: i) to loosen the restrictions i" t.n the zoningcode ori signs s in the C-P zone to allow more innovative and effective methods of signing consistent with g g good design and the special needs of intra=metropolitan office districts, 2) to provide for the special needs of large scale Commercial- Professional Planned Development Districts with respect to directional signing y gn. g particular) g .'.7)) to strengthen design control over signs in the CSP zone Present Ordinance Provisions 18.40.070 Signs. (a) There shall be not more than one square foot of Sign area for each one hundred sq. ft of floor area within y' the building. The total area of such a sign shall not exceed fife. w. teen square feet: ,, ,; q.,,wµexwu{v mwq Mt INMxni1H N. J'uw. � -,�. • .",,+' . (b) No sign shallproject above the roof line or extend over a public sidewalk or. right-of-way. All faces of signs shall be p the the building upon which the sign is located andatoewh•ichsign pertains. (c) Signs may not be painted, pasted or similarly posted directly on the surface of any wall. (d) The sign may be lighted withindirect lighting. No neon (exposed tubing) , plastic (interior illumination) , blinker, flashing or animated signs shall be permitted. (e) No billboards or "incidental use signs" shall be permitted. (f) Free-standing signs shall not be permitted in parking lots or in other areas directly related' to public access or to vision from the street. (Ord. 70-46 §4, Exhibit A (part) , 1970; Ord. 70-32 Sl56--7 1970) 18.40.070 Signs,: (1) Excej Projects ects Approved Under Provisions of Ch. 18.56: Excepting � a. No change. b. No change. r . . .... to c. Sumsmay be painted or otherwise applied directly a wall providingsuch signis an integral of building design and approval is obtained ,for such sign from the Design Review Board. d. No change. e. No change. a f. Free-standing signs designating a particular project site or building� lieu of Uulding cl tmay be permitted in mounted signs subject to specific approval by the Design Review Board. 2 Signs in a Planned beveloPmer t District (under provisions of Ch.c 18.56) for the specifao Purpose of site identification, building identification, tenant identification and traffic direction may be permitted � Planned Development as approvathe General Plan (Section 18.56.030) subject to Design Review Board approval, providing, that an integratedsign .. ,. with the . theme �is carried out compatibleroved overall development and consistent with the app 1 General Plan and Program. z .:• PC Staff Rep ort - 5/6/75 - item 4.1 • page. k N, ,aR I' +, .. .............tea.,.. ;....rn,,»: ...,.....w.. ,,..-..;: r_r.;,. .:._..;r:7.c. -.i .t t.c...:t,. a.r r.:,.:'Y. .+., � .......gra _'.-.:i. i.x,.- rt:'-..l f.l T._.YIA k '.f . -sk':x-- e' AFFIDAVIT 0 PUBLICATIO C „ M.® t 14 4 0.4 •,�. i'. a'+�'�, p STATE OF OREGON, ,�i x , ''� Y'.` 1t tt,r< +1 ,4'',, ,�,,i'i' COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ss+ CITY �� � '` ;f r i6' +o+:.?�l e' . -'' ' f,,.C+ i r/ + l ,,, a ,411,Ili,_ k.a u. i i .: {� a+ ., .- � � �, a 19 .1 F 1,4— y r 'i t� T r I. I, .,L• JQ.S.e +...a.S.cliai.�.r. . ,._... . ..J _ F r''''„ r -, gP;, ' 't` ".'11, . ' . i , a "h va �ab..aitly411 r,' ll�Y i, i t ' beingfirst dulysworn depose and saythat I am thepublisher .._....��_r..�._L_......„.„ t ti. , ; `t R.1,w� t`' .�.. ^ ,,t:t, ill.,-..?4, '',V t' p 1 • .,.:...a:..".L......J.. of The Tigard Times, a'newspaper of general circulation, as defined ; t,4:;�0 0 t , . ,ivi 7�� '' e e x a + • e i e ;cotl , , ' by ORS 193.010 and 193.020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and'. 4'41 ' •I t' + i°ri , :1.,. t. , legal notice a printed �ti .ra n �a r nx, : copy of which is hereto' anzaexed, was � �, - ��''..� � e ”;•; � r-;��,,,,�',�'""`� =� state; dial;. the � „, w �' �w'„°'„ �, � �� i Y....._.1 said ..:._ ,,.... J..,.. +.f'”.+7'1,111-1'•'11 I ' et`.. if} �,' + til published in the entire issue of n •Vvs a er for .'i2 , , e successive and � J r pp ps ij ,.ls •e�'§Ui � ,. a -156.4. • 0" '' :1 '' consecutive weeks iri the following issues F .''k- t 's; :• , . " }y•e' V �wi.••.liYM .....a13.. W.L+J..i.a..L.. .,.)..i.«.w ,.Y. � 4' J,i � a 1'. . ,'S>.r,g,,�. , 'ya °, .t -721)! :', - ii,,,', i ....LJL. .r« w,..w.r.w....r.3. ..a.iw._: �a.._...J- w.._. 1 i......---.. --- .w-- 1,�,�t. { �S • 41 , ' 4 7 4" tt f � rr�8•1 1J4�'A. �� �C`F"' i�t f�ii{',. ,tit• C ti 1 .7ry „ r 7 5"1Jf Y'i �'�,,.-,,,44, -. r4.J1r.Ja. ..a. ...T_. ;..1! ,: .vrl ... ..i..waa.y.l 4'�,.kH��M yy,��ri '� a J AI.b n.'",.S k9 gyp,, ?�„ X,, YyY l� na�ttre). ,. 'k C• 1 a'`'' at l Y f yliVg: • I ��w �r ;tlnawt r+�� �r'� 1+ ,;: ,,�i-,�iy 05,f ,, �lar7l ��'w p tl ' 'k ata«aa.a.i Y '',.' rrley +. Y l� �i♦''1",4: n`"n t. r' s'ribed;azid sy+o1n°to before me this v1'; .aa:.i a..«rauaJ.ya;,.�.,. day of , , ,. ,," • ,. .ba , `. rn i+ ot F ` k�rj� ih -..r� 'N.k.Y !1 kl S il � y .'� aC . ' � 1 r•R t "',.,[� i.,,,,,6'ii f, a J111 rM1 yR'(��]� • 1/�y�ai� '•�.,/y/�.wy).. ' �."1 J •''.. ' "��ryy�rf��1k,,'K{�„n 7� ...1'* t. fiat'k d' xf 7�i`i.a r• Yx,'Co'Tit •" Y i 7• �,:a a A.:}. ,i �( 'Naw t1 .� : „,,,..a.'..,...,,,,..1",:,...;„♦ J i."a.µL 4ti... Yp MM Y ', .. ,,,q l+ ,. /' lY ,, t� rt' :kYry� A i C.O� • + /1 (i S A{�i ti fir,+ W..,1i� F ° Lys i' Y� a ,_., w.w,,•Ja_ °.r"4., •. r :` rw :* + 9.4I i}„� s+ rr r1puvewz"+wu . . Notary Public of Oregon 4 �' ., V� }ai ,�{'p1 "..t3 � +o �� l� r Y 1 1 i 4,,+L 4,4” ""/+a�4 A T. ,,j4 I lrwr R" ..1,'i}t ,t' .° r 4't4 r t ' 'tl,,' *14 4' r 4 qr" {�kk >,� + ,4,,' ,. Y�.4114i,„lii �y , ��_ �L 1 iVly,eotninis n,"'expires ...:a., 1,. ..w.:t,L., 19.;.': k�,:"r +q, e t ft t ' ce+ , ,A ' 11 .a.: . .J.1. a i sf�x,,. } T t �'i0,1 .�� 'i r• yv��•/y ti. ......a iC Q n -•". a ' i Fi, i I'0 1.,. t . , ::iiJ+ ,.• 4, , I �q,, , t�e a i f it' Yw ,3'1 ;5 1� 2. n rN 3 ,5'" � f ,� S O' I,0.,tl ,a fit 'L-'s r1 '^'`''''V,114 y kw ori..a,1"4.. hu$,a ' xi..'3`� �' .F,,,k.,t;'i+ '' • • • 1 4 'a • .....w. ..:....,.......1.•';'"`,'.'...,.'''"riwtw:ir..r,tr.,,gr.ww.•..a.-.,,,,,,,...',..:•'....... ,.....r.a,w...w..raN..YwWrw ........+i•w,.wam+My�ar�m��Gux'uu<tuw-aahawwlti�.a,.aa...�ru,y ,e, t ' • • MINUTES TIGAFW PLANNING COMMISSION Study Session - April 22, 1975 Twality Junior High School - Lecture Room 14650 .S. W. 97th Avenue Tigard, Oregon 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:45 p.m. 2 ROLL CALL Members Present: Hartman, Hansen, Nicoll, Porter, Sakata, Wakem Jhittaker. Powell, staff • 3. MINOR LAN)) 'PARTITIONING MLP 2-75 (Peterson) A partitioning of lot 22, Ashbrook Farm, at 11095 SW 95th A. Staff report was read by Powell. B. Public Testimony o Mr. Peterson described his proposal. 0 Whittaker asked if he intended to extend the driveway through the site. o M . Peterson said he did not. o Sakata asked about sewer connections. o Mr. Petersonb replied -�hrey were in already, C. Staff Recommendation APPROVAL Ds dommisson Discussion and Action p Lisc'usaion centered on whether there would be a future need for access to the rear of this site Gnd whether there was a need for street improvements or dedication on SW 95th. o doted tb approve (Hartman) , seconded (Hanson) o Vote to a rote, unanimous,pp ni ous, node oppos9d v �rwmxrwM,y�rlv.lru+,+m+r+v*sP+u.0 MY 1.r,1TwxY{fyxr+pr ry,ry Yir1M 1, 4qxan.x„w..w.ru _ ' . i ,un...w... wsa..,+.w,am.Y++tu�1ahl41re5 �l •,•. a.f.ana.:+,uf.ne+rYr. ....,.,..,., .. wr 'i" •..:,_. Fes»»a wu.�u.r«w�4 �w&t„ • 4. PROGRESS REPOR.2.."JN N.P.O. FORMATION . Staff Memorandum Membership Structure of,,+NPO's 4 and 5, dated April 22, 1975 Discussion, primarilydealt with way the .in which. members • would be chosen and the potential, "loading" of the NPO's with individuals representing a specific interest. Con- cern was voiced that some common members members of both NPO!s - were necessaryto preserve continuity of pur- pose, between adjacent planning areas porter suggested a proportional voting scheme be used to • select delegates. Question was raised about the legal • l standing of the NPOs. . Whittaker said there had been a problem defining legal ts�astat 9taking P remedy tus• beat that. the Council was ste s to • Porter said he thought that representation ought to be . weighted in favor of residents. ' Wa`kem said a simple methodologyfor the selection p process as well as for selecting alternativelannin schemes would 'be preferable to a complex one and that the "general assembly1tl ought �� theopportunity propose e alternatives early �n theprooeseadthen have the opportunity at a later point 'to' select from several likely alternatives instead of being given a "fait accomplit" to ratify. Potter said he was not in favor of the staff-proposed e . selection method. •A, Vii. g"� concept Whittaker said the town. rrieet�.n cones would help to gain • • initial input -- that the problem with the process in NPO #1 was later when the plan was "presented" to the p people• • • Wakem said the idea was to maintain contact with the public --= that that was where NPO #1 had failed its expectations. 5. DISCUSSION OF ZONING ORDINANCEAMENDMENTS . : A. Powell read memorandum on ZOA strategy, outlining the staff's overall approach. Staff proposed the current status of proposed amendments and then read the revised wording of the C-P zone amendment. to Comthission Discussion o . Porter suggested that language be tightened up to restrict view of signs from off the site. PC Minutes - Apr . . 22, 1975 - page • • • t - .f+n.4. .ro.ur a#+.a4W r,kM•.. 1 GM1uwwMN.wmywCl4wl.»Wift+vel •..'YIIAt. .QLt- • `r..,.. i....- ..,m. -..i...,. .,., .. i xf.,w W+i'pyur.tayy.wva....,, vµw•H...,...,....«.:wv,...,..•srr+.n...v,.Y,.....n."...J, +,`a4L iNhy -..Cu013'Wit,.m.YW:+In'wiml^waw.ww.a. v • ( o Whittaker said he felt confident in the Design Review Board'sability deal with those questions, He thought the Design 5 4' aba.la.t Review Board ought to review the ordinance before it is approved. o Whittaker asked if staff had resolved the problem with defining "garden court apartments". o Powell responded that an alternative wording that would be consistent in the code was being worked on. 0 Hartman asked if an amendment to increase the lot size requirements for duplexes in an R-7 zone could be developed by staff. oM Powell responded that he would discuss it with Bolen. o 'Powell said that it would take some time to work out the overall effect of the presently-proposed ordinance amendments and that with the process now started, there would be a constant, ongoing revision process taking place. 6. DISCUSSION OF PERFORMANCE STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS ó Hansen asked if staff would contact Clark County or visit the mini-warehouse commercial project off St. Johns Rd. . near EPA in Vancouver. o ' Staff said they'd look into it. o Whittaker oopinionThe C. y Attorne yon . whethepermitted uses are foreclosed or modified by the existence of a conditional use permit for a specific use of a premise 7 STREET NAME' CHANGES (M -75) 5 .. Streets .Commission.. A, Staff explained ned that the Planning Coa.mhad authority to ,_.change the Harries of Streets (in conformance with state and county street names policy) by resolution, leo public hearing is required unless a contest is involved. Bi Commis .on Discussion and Action m Waken moved approval.. of a resolution to change the names of subject Streets per staff recommendation o Seconded (Porter) , approved, O'er . ,. 8 R BU'S71VESS, Pd Minutes April 220 1975 • page w..M«aN.w.++H+•��w .«r,.Wrw» f .. .w . siMc'krvnx. a�i'a �kcM+'�NIA'mt�If.��,S�.,w�m.Y++++u.w qy � -., - . 1 A. Transportation Planning • (1) Porter reported on his transportation study asked previously by the Commission. Summarized, his ' major points were that: 1. A mass transit alternative should be considered in future planning that future land use planning should recognize the potential for transit service and allow for it. 2. resign of transportation system should consider trip to work peak hour in order to provide best economy and satisfy greatest need; 3. Design si g nnaltratves should include park and expressservice to Portland (already included in Tr -Met plans) andconsider in- ,. creased service levels for these alternatives. 4 A possible innovation that could be developed in the Tigard area is a shuttle bus service incorporating mini buses or special buses hool buses out of service at the time. i 13Discussion o Much interest surfaced in the possibility of the • . City of Tigard operating a mini bus/ school bus system auxilliary to Tri-Met, serving the town. • o Porter said that there appears to be no legal reason the City couldn't and that demonstration grant money could be available. The cost of operation, maintenance aintenance and insurance was men.tionedasmajor problems. o Location and design of transit stations was briefly brought up. . o Whitaker said that he thought Bolen and Buttke were • t. going to contact Tri-Met. o Porter said he would have his report it a publishable { form fairly soon. i 9. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at lb i 45 p.m. di PC MinUtes - April 22, 1975 - page 4 . .„,,,, w.,.va+ro,..._,wr.r,,... .,,,,„,,,w+xy-,,,„„; „,.„..,w 1 N,.......,..,....,,.._...,...... ....._„..w._...•,. _.... _,ru«++r,„,„,„,.„rir,ard,.r#',„,,,„,„,,„„:,,'w!„....—r,. w...r„{ .... _.•;. .. • • G • eMemorandum Proj . _____ 1ect _ Job Number . • Date 4 April 19 7,5 il Subject: Telephone Call 0 Conferer,tE;iip Inspection 0 • Re: Tigard City Sign Ordinance Meeting at B P,Conference Room at 4:30 Pai4i esen , Mike Oberhofero Oiick Bolen & ferry Powell of City Planning and Bill Findlay, „; t o request madeLincoln Properties (adjacent djacent to F r ers popenty the City has been attempting to rewrite their sign ordinance for their CP zone. ', Recent attempts did not seem suitable for the larger Farmers development. After much discussion it was decided that the sign ordinance for CP zone would e rewritten but that Planned Unit Development Office Parkst, such as Farmers • would be a l l owed to develop their ownsigning programs open to creative' development nt of the special char cteristic of the project progremo siteo etc. This sign program would be reviewed by the Planning Commission the same at any other element of the PUO Office Park program. This was agreeable to all. F.} ... N OF '1gy'J1y (Niy(gyygr DI trlb tlo' 1 ' Pr wsent R h . °P ingdul pia is W 11l lam,P1nd`i y /pi torn Gilbert R.K. Spies tI i,' odoli B01411.1611 F11 e droomey Partners; Atohit¢ots and,hlahnsrs AIA 730 Northwoat Avenue Portland,drew l 97209 Phohe;2231575 . ...„y .w.."""^"wn'",. •arA.iyf,MfML.1NphYW WA4if 3,MMYw4W.tl`y'•,.... ..,. ...,..... ...., ....,uta+e'Ywr»nlfwfn..+M.+""""'"T"n" t m�fl4ubYNRYik., �� . P • f A , I •. ,'i f (/1• ' ,,.p{ r ,.,t,+.q..,..�. .-, .w ... ..,... .4a...�rr..Jrl ,,,... :a.., s.:„,•.,:^ n ... .. .,.s;.a ,.r •,,.. aa� r • 6.) ....% .t • , e • ..cis i,„3„,„ r. r" . t, ___„,..„ ,,- - - . .d ,...: ..,,,, . .„4.,_,,,, , .. , — .- ,. opc_....,,, ... ti ...... . ,,,,,......4r .•�'L-i-n 43 4.1. 61.e.e')*?'10.5 '''. . 6 , 6 m t, t o 6yJ he 2—. Z . / ..,5' 7,....§"' • • II , ..,. r, e..,w,x rw,s.,M niSwM WIK avh,w+ri«„PcrU-wcM^Ipw ro,a,., n.*+•...,, F' t IP`''",awawar.i.q+...r...+,.,a«wMy�.,rMaaW?sn++riPon4;m�tauk'.t11uR,Satirt'��4RIu,'aw/yCnsww�aa�c ., Y � • I AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION .NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING r OF TIGAR STATE OF OREGONCll.'? D PLANNING COM- , SS. MISSION{.t , COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, Notice is hereby given that public hearings will be held by the Planning • Joseph. Schafer Commission of the City of Tigard in the irwality Junior High •Schr-' ,Lecture Room 14650 SW 97th Ave,. Tigard,.'~ being first duly sWorn, depose and say that I am the publisher �_.:».::z Oregon, Said hearings,will oehur on i f' `April �, 1975 at 8:00 P.M. and Will coni , cern the following:' ,. �` I ..x.Y.•::.:,,..w.>�.» of The Tigard Times, a, newspaper of general circulation, as defined li Arequest ,by Geroge Scott for by ORS 193x010 and 193.020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid 1 cion o inarx Plat 1000 andl partf sub 00i, Washington County,:Tax Map 1 1 S1 � ., g county and soon of Tax Lot 1000 and of 100 located a roximate# 500 feet south of S'UV Gree '' state; ` printed :.} 98th Aenue.. y on SW ' that the legal nonce a ' copy of which is hereto annexed was pp nburg Road published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ,:.��' .LL�:1::: successive and Proposed amendments to th ,Zoning O rd#nonce of the City of Tigard,the fol- consecutive weeks in the following issues »....,,:.L.. ... w..L:Y«wi 1liL::l>»>...»:...::_ lowing chapters to be considered for ret Vision: March ._ 27 i97 M-4, Industrial Park Zone (18,52) ._.1.,+. •.'iWr...>..L C-P,Commercial Professional' 18,40) ef' C-3 General Commercial (18,28) >Y Y ~u ?General a Family (Sature) R-!,SingleFa)ply Residential(18.20) ' Site DevelopmentPPlan (18.58) ..Subscribedand sworn to before me this 2TP1w. day of Architectural Design Re4iew (18.5F 9) iFloi e Administration (18.92).) , i �.lliL.1:..Ma 'c ]:.Y,..,Y.•x.. 19 75 All persons having an interest• in these matters are ihvited to attend and be heard, u.'.�-..• .-� �-►-�--�--: (TT 2819 y..µJYµxMw,wlLil YµllwµµLxµwx(.lµ'wl.Yf.i.i:i _L�.w.• Y aLL.a.» .1.aML.y µ:' _YYµ:.1 ' 'ahl#sa March 21, 1975) Notary Public of Oregon My commission expires • { 41, Y_,-Y....w.som.ww..r+ww-r'.+.+vJ+�w.:w,.r4.W'iwe, ,ft,11 1$.11 ; .•.. r..x�x�..�.Yxx: �xrtwarp...wvyr.a.w ;e.p.>I.++V nW.l N',«.rprWxw.xiraHi✓+.Wdi r1w� .;..... ,«.. ,.�..-,.-,. �; ,.� mwufeknwL4,x A�xar,+(�en.nr�nwr,..u...u.+^«w,o,�;. • Memo To: Fred Anderson, City Attorney Jerry Planner From: Powe11 Associate Subject: Sign Regulation in C-P Zone The .City of Tigard's sign code (Ch. 16.36.040 S 2) provides that only those signs gra.s permitted by the zoning code (Ch. l8.40070) are allowed • Does this mean that: o • 1. no othersign than those specified in 18.40.070 may be dis- played? What about real estate signs? 2. If the zoningexclude estate sign -�- yet code cannot e�cl a real. est sign control is reserved in 16.36.040 exclusively to the • zoning code --�» do the Size., number and location restrictions • in the sign control code apply -r. or are they in fact void? 3. Does a request from a developer for a free-standing sign, • visible from a public street, require a variance of the zoning • code or the sign control code in C-P zone? • • • • • • • • • Memorandum Tb: Planning Commission From: Staff Subject: Amendment of Ch. 18.40.070 (signs in the commercial- professional zone) Objectives: to loosenthe restricti0ns in the zoning code on signs in the C-P zoneto allow more innovative and effective methods of signing consistent with good design and the special needs of intra-metropolitan office districts. Needs: • an apparent need exists for better nameplate location with respect to multi•-building projects and for better identification of the district as`a whole • Proposal: .... , . yw ._ . .�,•.,,... .. _.. - __.r .. .. .w. ., ,__�_ :� .. � _ . w ..... K �. .. to all0v certain free-standing signs to be constructed in a C-P Zone under Specific conditions and setting size and lo- , . ( cation restrictions Present Ordinance Provisions: • 40 0 70 signs. (a) There shall be not more than one square foot,,of sign. area for each one hundred square feet of ` � ' floor area within the building. The total area of such a t sign alloec . yf _ quare feet (b) ' NoSign gnshallproject abovethe roof line or extend 1 over a public sidewalk,, or right--of-way. All faces of signs shall be parallel to the face of the ) ui,lding upon which the * g signpertains. si r7 is loca�,c.d and �o which -�h e (c) Signs may not be painted, pasted or similarly posted directlyon the surface of any +wall The sign may be lighted with No ' ) . �,. • sect lighting. neon (exosed .tub n ) (interior it d �ndi P � g_ � plasticlum :nation) , b13.nk�- er flashing or animated signs shall� y be permitted. (e) ' No billboards or incidental use sign ' shall be permitted. • Y / . 1 .. g g be permitted in park- ing lots or in other areas directly not Y . , .. g elated to public access or to vision«on from x the street. (Ord. 70-46 g4 , h.ibit A (part) , 1970 : Ord: 70-3 gi56-7, 1970) ,.»-..,..+,.++-.•..n .W.r..w , "+ry.rf'N"o•T+'PriiiS:rt Y'd.Nfktii.#i•Ati 1tLU\MN.IM4hn!'WnCM.9.. •..,. •, .. �aww.+nry uwYu.waN..sN`F+r me.wur.:N N iWNr*!ti\.'Y N. .M•IFu»ur.,*-.••.••n..i .. M �WM ' W\M.iW*1�14:id•pwp' N rk Proposed Revisions. ., C 18.40.070 Signs. J • ' (a) same as above-mentioned (b same as above-mentioned ( Signs gmay paintedapplieddirectly to a c Si ns be or otherwise. wallrovidin such signis an integral" part of building design and pproval is obtained for such sign from the architectural Design Review Board. (d) same as above-mentioned e same as above-mentioned parkallowed commercial-professional f In an officesignificantrthaneonebuilding,' i development of more } , x"Arr , , free-standing sign may option the ' b adjacent to thesprimarypublic entrance. No be provided primary such sign may exceed the total area allowable under para- graph (a) the. maximum ximum height for such a sign shall a be 7 ft. (to top of sign from ground at of sign) . • (g) Major off-premises "area" or "distr'ca" signs may be "allowed': subject to approval of the Planning Commission and Design Review Board. Such sign may not be • used to• advertise e a particular` building, enterprise, product, "J . u - - or service and must apply generally to the district or area .-_...... identified. ` , ti • . " Memo 4/l/7 - page y..anArynrvn f^A'px•w ain .Aauw."f..wvnn.r.zµ!en/...»w.P•n,r+w M i ••.--••.•^F•• .>.-« p....m.J w.......,...r.....«rr++++Tr•,xmry.Mkd^Nat CIrAluixSAAP1GbMkz:iNXr4J/w.xlA'a". W:.WW'+'"+A'.-K.rz.. - ,,' '.. . I . '( ., . 4,'''''' , .. . ''.. • C .* v Y R A '''' '' M t* ' 4e4 '' ..., ." . 4 CIA/114 f C1144 14/1 i,f i 124 4 '1 'P R( ( * . M 1 '''''..'''.. IP.L'*'''V ' 5 1-z7L( ., * • ' ' . ' . . , . : owt • , , 44IweiR �IA, i . ec7~ t.sec. , Q 4 rL7t( L 2c l1 G�..eot' .�:�,� a i f S' 4tc7 t .0s t t tlt,t t ii, R Sytiis �ef�11✓�i t✓l7 4dttoe)-1-4-it �((/`V .� t'ti° 6!�[ 'C. a /60 1 • J///f%�J� (.1t 1 ,. . „ . tali-etc-4e' , c() 0 L____Pdtit— Sit It Cole— ` . *. ' ti , , 1 y . . ,:., ( ,... , ...ec., off', . / © I11e t i4 i coc.e. ' Y ve -tv- S � t� rn evt tt9 ao � O/4 Cart et,/)ia koocti.. ., u- rki p 4) Aat I t �-f4�! tut ct. �a c�^ y-et incl P� ',�. . „ 01. tl ,4 1, ,... . i ( , t t(� ik fly ae,, dGz G G0i r f� 1-1 p,..,... .(-(,t,, a, ..s ( • . si . ( . - , S uca .(C- e 1VPI e.-v 7 evi ae.,, . . ' • * R , 5 ••('''-' . * . 3 • • �„ � ,gig t � ,5 l � V' �t�i , � . IL it (eia/ , i. . , N ., : .//.._ i, . e,L. 4 , . . j / . ( S `�"�� j � A V� V C © . � , is , • 0 A a ' i ,. .fig 741 .0 c, !L- le7 a �'p �'!` t , /oe la pcvl� . e / 1 , , t, .,,___, , „..., „ ,),„ i it — '' - ' ' -i ( 17L"j-i,e . i '1,e;, ''t...T • . ” i ip 1 1 . ow, rekilftic„ g e71 cc•-i,.t cam". I t v'L'e 4t6t ,7 Rr* wR1awW'k++~we+wwt.. ,r..:,Mnh++ ._,,... nlf „,,,....,,..,*);.,„..,.,,,L.,..,_.,� ., + � w.1M"•"x"'n'1, r rrrMM1wl�m^J ,.. ,,. ..... .....,... ,- x rnwltq:pquL'SU!]M$R,M1 dNaw'lNs1:,IC�-nF'f r 3.Lt+hro+ArvlP'+'R°Ww • e• • o • • 1 • • cases,, �e. 7""L/r`//e s'�'<e/e.�' e -- �cc. cc.v-c[ + e , . ,....../_. ,. , . .. . 64......._ , • , . . ....:....-..--, .a.. - -..,ec-Out - , a ,r. , 4.,f . . . . , .. . ( . . , Y Ak✓'f P/B ,a e�-. (l (U4' / • a • , L GX.C A l�j ‘, ci..( ( . ) /:17 sl. J . • . • A , / . ... , 4 eiL -5U Se ' '1011 ' C-- ' . - yt4...s• . .6 lc ('',A.) ic 1'. 0.-e.: l'eteet. . . .• w • . ; ,s uta l be ve ulk ec` u c(ct: -041 • M h 4001,17 e fo coyY ? , , , • Gl ' - ' `f e / t # 03fie vsYt a c 6 � . d , ... 51 ' Pt i m.tet7 e • t • , I. i • 4 • • • ' .e' ', '(..'e'•• p'8,e...t.,e ).i 44/C://- 118,0 I :s.1. .1...1.4., e-)71.. i.,,,,-, i ei ......_ F 60" • Y , • • • • • ftp w, St » RY • l • ! r F ( f . » • » • » • 1. 4. M ., ., ';:•'+;;;;;"..4',::::.:, ..":. :I;".•':, ..,. ,.. w ';;......:.i.....'::..: .:. , ...a frw.�a Y• ., r .: ,J :. 1 .wwwweYN•Y•W!•s• Yw+,.VM,,.(wlro,w.,>� ( , ., r:.... �. �