The URL can be used to link to this page

ZOA1-75 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. f �. ti3 r al i ,Fi l 7 r,r1:at',+f t o �^S4,i'� hp, t,ii ,� Iwx1 alp y rr Sl Fi. f F t (f($41'f4y1: Int�a r,v b ^ u. t1.-,, ,.,,,,'4,"?.;-'el)!;,:-.4.." al !f "tai ''11, ,i'. ',•!..,.•.,.:4.:,,,,,A.-•,,,,,,,,l,' ,yj l. I rw f ) >, xiht;'; It f^^�.tt1- �&Llra fit x p alil t,`:r4'p f`97 .}�t�`tr. F�1�,��. 11 22 ri J'` 1 e I S V y,, fy !�!{,I ra9 *a,Y ,5..o- ,t A;41, 5 ' ''tY". 51.4 hs,i J ` A, ,1 1 5 4 r .!'+4+4!` `,,4,-,(1:..,..,';',' z..,, -:x�`i..j�.. '�11 dr�;,M U,r.rf , i 1)t.-,Ca !f$ rl,1 h •o�s y^ E *.a. �.. . .�iG 11": �11 e 11 �Ief: � i�lU Yv.l r., n.f,r l,i!a l'r f.S'';r X•�...,L.:i rcs',�.�'. n1 1 if"C:i•�./4 :tt hrR. 400 AMEND. C-3 ZONE, C-4 ZONE AND f�' fiw 4 ,Is s `` 1;x; CREATING A C-3M ZONE .,' ,. ,. .w-, �., .._,.. sa v. _ ,..�,�.... .,.....,._,,...,.... ,._.-.,, .,.. •.r,r.._«,...m. .w,«,:.,.a,......._`_.." et Zone Ordinance Amendment (ZOA 1-75 "FX1,',.. ,,,.,,6,V. 4., tv;% 1� ...,,,',5::,,, ,r 1,4, 1,rci a+ pt ;� ,:41:,','.:,...15,, a rin! � � t ,!'e,,,,:,7, r f- ,,%•,,,,4,..,,,,: S1{h '" i j +; uIj 4 f'' :,'0, ,..,',, pij it 1,0 1lt,'ti' it h�I. 1 i f$F ,i(; ' s 'YY \.',,,. ,, . I.�4'it t+�, f,'r ,Erz t1 Y r�V r yy r r; • µ. i Y yt` ;r . J .5;:' r t 'r';,r a.•.,af. t ;y„ „-_ n„t- ,t: �:tlr,t .r„ i. .t, t',t, - - _ t. J ;wr "'-=—H„!.,, : CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON i; r.v « « err ,,,I,.:,,,,,. ORDINANCE No. 75- ggf:- 9.9 ,4;; AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTERS 18.28, e:0,, GENERAL COMMERCIAL, AND 18.32, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, WITH RESPECT ,,w � ',t4','' REQUIREMENTS CONDITIONAL USES, LOT REQUIREMENTS AND LANDSCAPING ,,w,; TO PERMITTED USES, tPRESCRIBING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. „ THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: ',ry;.. Section 1; The City Council finds that pursuant to Chapter 227 ORS f Zoning , of 1970 --- the hereinafter stated3amen'dmentsotoTs zoningiddOrdinanceiac and Ordinance No. • after due and legal notice, Were submitted to public hearing°ordinance, h, �i bythe •,. y April 1, 1975, and to the Councl hereafter .'u' recomthendednthatmsaidizoningrdinance be amended as hereinafter set g ,, forth, i i, • r r . ' T ie Council further finds• that after due and legal otice 7;�`; Section 2 c , _��,� a public hearing was held by the City Council on May12, 1,,l,„. 1975, Whereat all interested.per,sons were afforded an opportunity to be 4i heardwith respect thereto, and conditions precedent fulfilled With. „' respect to the following amendments to the City's zoning ordinance. rry Section.3:, The Council further finds that the purpose for these:amend- •° . '�' �1y general as rlates to trffic hazards�and icongestion; and i+14`t , welfare, especially lth safe�t and eneral s is �o protect the public health, ''�;,ti p ment gas stated iy's objectives ,,C firth commercial development ermore,� said amendments serve to implement the Ci in the Tigard, if'' and policies, concerning P `? Community_ Plan, Neighborhood Plan Number One arid. Ne:��;hborhood Plan 1;;. Number TWo. . t'10 ', ' ;� .;;' Section 4 That Chapter 18.28 General Commercial Zone (C-3), be amended to read as follows: Sections ” '"'} 18.28.010 Permitted Uses 18.28.020 Conditional Uses i ,',.sl‘' 18.28.030 ,Lot Requirements.,, . . ' 18.28.040 Setback Requirements . #' 18.28.050 Building Height • ,y�' 1. 18,28.060 Additional Requirements f3r'' �'a'4 18«28.010 Permitted .Uses. No building structures or land shall be used tela'i: c+�; and ria bU lda.ng or structure shall hereafter be erected, enlarged or 4,;",: altered in the C-3 zone except for the following Uses: s Y ',rx;` 1 Appliance. parts;` ,, f1,, 2 Appliance store (performing incidental repairs only); Automol ile:Peru f accessory sales; • ' , ,,,,N\ti 3 ' 3ank i loan companyooraother ofinanciel •institution; .. . .I .Blue rintin ,p Lig r other reproduction process; 6 Business machines, retail sales and service;." '� 5 ip- .Blueprinting) i 1 7 Furniture .store; till' Film distribution venter;' a , l9 Frozen food looker (family Use only). . . >�Py 0 Y� ls ; ` L. 11 Tnetruments, scientific or professional (repair shop); p), 12 el 2 Ord 7O 3" ,: 1Newsstand, ._ �w 0 8l 7 y -� z S14o1 ,r. 14 Radio or T.V. Service (Ord. 72 r , n tw 1970); a y , 1:.. `'r«n to ", i y. • i .y ; 1, , , o�t • • ,;•. .r ate, !^' iR #�..SilPln,{�.myi..",N••+^++n++.,. .,i ty tvn, t y .i ,+WS',. ^.� .9,+,Cw.p lf r , 1 ,., 15) Real estate Office; , (16) Sporting goods store • 4,; 18.28.020 Conditional Uses. In the C-3 zone the following uses and ,,,, their accessory used may be permitted as conditional uses when in 0411 accordance with Chapters 18.72 and 18.84: pit' , conditional or permitted use in a C,--4 zone excepting, Y , '' ' (1) Any mobile home parks; . ,i. (2) Amusement enterprise, including billiard or poolhall, "',11y; bowling alley, boxing arena, dance'hall, public swimming pools; r 3 Appliance repair; ,4 Auditorium, exhibition hail or other public assembly; ck'. Automobile, boat and trailer sales; �,�,., 5 Automobile and boat repair.s, painting, and upholstery; , {' establishment; . 1 ,�, 7 Catering establishme %' 8 •Churches and accessory uses; w,' 9 Cleaning establishment; �'� l0 Colleges; , (11/ '"Commercial,; schools °such as businesscollegesy music con,,, ',.. servatories and trade schools; • , k`' (12) Community buildings (public); '0' goods and services directly to , (13) Drive-in business offering customers waiting in parked motor vehicles; ro. 14 indoor, outdoor and other theaters; y, 15 Feed stores; ,a.• 16 Governmental,structures •or land•ease not including-schools; , fir,' A . 17 • Hospitals, convalescent,: general, home for the aged; ' a' 4A 18 Hotel (residential); 19 Libraries; ,:r',. 20 Lodges, fraternal organizational. • +4' 21 Lumber yard; . w . 22 Medical--dental clinic t lr>, accessory sales and service;; • 23Motorcycle and. ac Museums; p ` g' 25 Parks and. playgrounds rounds (public); , 26 Pet shop; ,1, " general contractorand shop, g , �,, 28 Printingnshop cand�newspaer publishing; , 30 club; „ Professional or commercial office building; • ,, • 3Private ,- 0 S2, 1972;, Ord. 70-32 8140-2, 1970); ,. , 31 Restaurants (Ord 72 7 , ,," . 32 "' Secondhand store; 33 Taverns; cocktail lounges, bars, clubs and,any other activity a g, membership or attendance is restricted as k; ' to�se laagengrou oz other specific limitation; � , age, P 34 Tiro shop; j1`Y ' 35 Veterinarian5s office or animal hospital; m „, ,t., 36 Any bue:i.ness, service, processing, storage or display essential ,,t1 or incidental to any permitted use in the 0-3 zone and not conducted entirely-Within el' within an enclosed buildingl(Ord. 72-70 82, ,� { y,. 1 ,k ' 1972; Ord.' 70-32 8110-2) 1970), :),4,,i° nts .. In the C-3 zone the lot requirements shall . , l828.030 ',Lot Requyr eme be as .follows:..._' (lots crea-Ced'prior to the enactment of this ordinance ': on May 12, 19751 and being less than the minimum required shall be con ,y- '. ,' ,, sidered legal and conforming to the requirements of this title) ' i'kl, 1 The minimum lot area shall be 30,000 sq ft: 2 The minimum lot width shall be 150 ft: �„ ► 1 ° i 3 Ido maximum lot coverage shall be required: (oir'd: 742 , 810~+3; 1970) '11 r -2- {•'11 r, ' OR1IINANG1 No: 75-P' tiri is Y, f 4 . fl , ": r , 4 , d) .. f v r f r " 4, + if yr,' r',i• ". 18.28.040 Setback fR� Except as ma :rother.�wise be provided �, , � " {uirements. , ,,; in Section 18.12.100, the setbacks for non-residential uses in the C-3 ''y: zone shall be as follows: ` (1) The minimum' front yard shall be ten feet, landscaped and • ' T'' maintained (see general provisions 18.12.100); fx� ,`'''l (2) No side yard setback shall be required, except When abutting ,; a residential zone, a side yard of 10 ft. shall be required; (3) No rear yard ,setback shall be required, except when abutting 1 4 • a residential zone, a 'rear yard setback_of twenty-five feet 4 ,+ shall be required. (Ord. 72-34 S4, 1972; Ord. 70-32 s140-4, , 1 t'',, /1970) Sr( j, , .28.050 Building_Height. Except as otherwise provided in Section 18.12.110, no building 1.n the C-3 zone shall exceed a height of three I. ','• stories or thirty-five feet, "whichever is less. (Ord. 70-32 S140-5 `}``: 1970) • !Y i�+ * 18.28. 060.Additional Requirements. Additional requirements applicable r'" to the C-3 zone include, but are not limited to, the following: .. ,,',, street parking and loading, see Chapter 18.6=; • ,r 1 Off-- ", 2 Access and egress, see Chapter 18.64; "}l t 3 Landscaping - a minimum .of 15% of the total lot area shall be a`st', landscaped;landsca ed; in addition, see Chapters 18.58, Site Develop-- � ' , merit Plan and 18.59, Architectural Design Review; ' li, 4 Enclosure and screening required, see Section."18.12.080; , �5 Nuisances prohibited, see Section 18:12.0.70 (Ord.. 71-4 S7 oq (part), l971; '0rd. 70-32 S140i6 1970); «', Section 5 That Chapter 18 32, •Neighborhood Commercial Zone (C-4), be amended to read as follows: • ^", Sections: ,3,, 18. 2. 010 Permitted Uses „;�. 18.32.020 Conditional Uses • d,,� 18.32.030 Lot Requirements ,,,,, 18.32.040 Setback Requirements µr r',i,' 18,32.050 Building Height 4, 18,32.060 Additional Requirements ,x and no building or structure shall be hereafter e1.ected, enlarged.bo used '''' '' 1832.010 Permitted Uses. No b,�ildi.n structure or land shall. i",',1,; altered in the C-4 zone .except forthe following uses . ‘ (1) Bakery, provided any manufacture of goods is limited to • ' goods retailed on the premises only; {, 2 Barbershop; . �';k'i 3 Beauty parlor; , 4 Ctyllection at tion for dry cleaning or laundry;; t; 5 Delicatessen store; ;f ,, 6 Department store, 7 Drug store or pharmacy including incidental fountain service i, but not including any other use unless specifically permitted' under.this chapter; „rt (8 Florist or flower shops; • 9 Gift shop; - (10 Grocery store; 'yo, (11 hardware store; 12 Q`ewelry store; 13 Laundromat; ' ` ,, 14 Meat market; ' ' ; k, 15 Record shop; • , , '16Shoe repraiir Without and book openstores. to persons of all ages ' ` patronage restrictions, „,w, ,r ORDI ANCE No. 75- g titian°. t:' a ,c . y ..Y .,.... ths 4 ,w ti' 9 `xa4 . Lir (18) Tailor shop, dress shop, clothing sto , other similar service ; ,, ,: or retail use, if approved by the Planning Commission, and �,; subject to the same conditions; k" '` (19) Variety store (Ord. 72-70 83, 1972; Ord. 70--32 8150-1, 1970). 1'4 18.32.020 Conditional Uses. In the C-4 gone the following uses and (xi J",'a their accessory uses are permitted as conditional uses when in accord ° dance with Chapters 18.72 and 18.84: :01„, 1 Cgnditional use as permitted in an A-2 zone; '. 2 Carden supply store; 3 Home occupations; el',. < (4 Multi-family dwelling subject to the regulations of an A-2 =,Ly` , zone; .0. 5 Public utility; ((6 Restaurants; . (7,„1, Service stations (incidental repairs only); . • t".'% 8 Anybusiness service, processing, storage or display essential or incidental to any permitted use in the C-4 r n 1 . zone and not conducted entirely.within an enclosed building; 7 0,/„.:.- (9)' -Doctor' or dentist and.professional, or commercial.off±ce .r; „°M°,. 4�x (Ord. 70-32 S150-2, 1970). W4J ,r •: 18.32.030' Lot Requirements._. 1n the C-4 zone the lot requirements =,Ipx shall be as follows: . 4 1 The minimum lot area shall be six thousand sq. ft.; �, 2 The minimum lot...width.shall be 'sixty-feet;,-,.. i''.:t 3 The maximum lot coverage shall be sixty percent. (Ord.. �� . , 70_32 5150--3, 1970)• .1 '., , 18.32.040 Setback Requirements. Except as may otherwise .be provided ,it. in Section 18.12.100, the setbacks for non-residential uses in the C-4 !, ;v; t''4 zone shall be as follows: ',;(-I' The front yard setback shall be twenty feet; 1. (2) No side yard setback shall be required, except when abutting (r4 , Y a residential zone, a side yard setback of five feet shall r,sy required; x y e's (3) No rear yard setback shall be required, except when,abutting X,An+ a residential zone, a rear yard setbacof twenty-five fee 'r shall be required. (Ord,. 70-32 S150-4, 1970). 18:32,050 Buildiin Hei'ht. .. ;Except es otherwise. provided'in Sections...` ,,i. r 1.8.12.110, no building in the C-4 zone shall exceed a height of three r , . stories or thirty-five feet, whichever is less (Ord. 70-32 8150.-5, ,1 1970). , i,' '18.32.060 Additional Requirements. Additional requirements applicable '"° to the C-4 zone include, but are not limited to, the following: (1 Off-street parking and loading) see Chapter 18.60;.• ,s aa 2 Access and egress, see Chapter 18,64; Vit (3 Enclosure and screening required,. see Section 18,12,089; , 1 1, (4 Signs, advertising signs and sign structures shall be subject to tho conditions, limitations, prohibitions and. . + requirements- of Title 16, to which particular reference -, is made; � (5) Labent landscaped,ed;ainminimum ad addition is eof' Cha Chapters total .58t area shall p Site OevelOpment Plan and 18.59, Architec Architectural f0esigia Review; ! Nuisances prohibited, see ' ' �. (6) Section .070. (Ord. 71-4 x;,' 87 (part), 1971; Ord. 70-32 8150-6, 1970). . 4 -4- .a '��'. .`ORDINANCE No, 75-2. .a oi, 1r 1 a M '1. R L p 1199 .Y r 1 ; 14. "'"""""'"r1"11"'""""'"'""* ms'""""'YYP 1"1f•,"'"”""'W41T "* ,rr'''''air. p m•.'—'''',"'''t :'""1,',","',,,n",.,,r FLxs 4 ,.., w•. . fie ,. ,- . . 1.t.:,'i r?'M k ry 5 V f ��J jf J t W 11„ --:.i f +�.,. 1 .��1 I. 1� l.,t ��. .1 Jl Y. � 14 'r.F 1, tr€ • , Section_-6. Inasmuch as it is necessaryfor the p r11 ,,r peaces health and safety of the people of the City of Tigard that the ,,, zoning matters as hereinabove set forth be established with the §h, least possible delay to thereby currently maintain the legislative � ,, integrity of the City's zoning ordinances, an emergency is hereby ' declared to exist and this ordinance shall be effective upon its +'/ enactment by the Council and approval by the mayor. ,,ti; A6� yI , 'r'; r • ;`T PASSED: By ma jc,�,`-f- vote of all Council member, present, 'after i�t being read three times by number and title only, this ,:pB d ;`1' day of L - , 1975. elr' a?„y , t,fx,}r.. .' S a } 1 +f u R corder - ity of i igard a4.'4 t Er }i+ i1f'1a APPROVED; By the Mayor; this 2.2” day of -J7(1,-4,2_. , 1975. w41li e.,l +iii. /� I` / 7 t4 "4y,, M 1 or -- City of Tigard ati 1TM V 1, Z f r , j Aiw d 1 " 7 Yy ani r 4a rI; 4 t` , / P t 4 ,A ,, O tDl ANcg Ifo. +;, `' , ,'Sr ; A a t 4�, y, + 1 a. a , r, ' O,. 'i•^""^"'..,-...'^'c!"'". ".«"„tYFr+Mr,',,,,,',,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,r,,, ;ra"r., 7,w,..M.s.i f :me''.tp�rarMm a+I;wr,m.,nxMrS inYqrp gams• 'n stf+.;q.Y"r, •nary. "4 4 Yh .4., , 1, , -t <, • ',qi a4,, e , !di, w ..t- rfii r` CITY OF TIGARD ,OREGON s.° , ORDINANCE NO. 75 - AY ' t ,f, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 70-32 ENTITLED "CITY OF •et. TIGARD ZONING ORDINANCE OF 1970",AS AMENDED, AND AS CODIFIED 5; IN TITLE 18 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE, BY ADDING A NEW "` CODIFIED CHAPTER DESIGNATED CHAPTER 18.30, ESTABLISHING A P`'; MAIN STREET COMMERCIAL ZONE, DESIGNATING THE BOUNDARIES THEREOF t?: BY ATTACHED _ZONING MAP; PRESCRIBING AN EFFECTIVE DATE A.-NP FIX .+, AN EFFECTIVE DATE.` ,., THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: e!' ' i +, nds that pursuant to Chapter 227 ORS '�,' Section 1t The City Council finds "City of Tigard Zoning Ordinance of 1970" No. 70-32, ,0,, hereinafter appearing, after mduemand slegal anotice,nweredsubmitted topblic hearing by the 4''i' City Planning Commission on May 20, 1975, and to the Council there- ,,' • after recommended that said zoning ordinance be amended as herein- It'r;1 " after..set forth. ' � Section 2: The Council further finds that after due and legal ,n notice a public heating Was held by the City Council l' on Tune 9, 1975, whereat all interested persons were afforded an „'+,, opportunity to be heard with respect thereto, and conditions pre- ,q., 'i cedent fulfilled With respect to the following amendments to the {i r ,;°ta,j City's zoning ordinance.. *, Section 3: The Council further finds that the purpose for these 1;. ! amendments is to protect the public health, Safety and , r , general welfare and furthermore, said amendments p nt Serve to implement , xt` the Cityis objectives and policies concerning commercial develop 0,. Cent as stated in Ned.ghborhood Plan Number One. The Main Street men '4'; commercial Tigard differs significantly in development , ,; pattern from commercial district of st a properties abutting S. W Pacific Highway 4,� within the City and vehicular traffic problems and congestion are `'i " less Severe on S. W. Main Street in providing direct access therefrom ti1!r; to commercial properties, ,N,; Section 4: The 'tCity of Tigard Zoning Ordinance of 1970" No. 70-32, I as heretofore amended and as codified in Title 18 of i ;''the Tigard Municipal Code, be and the same is hereby amended to � t,. add a new" codified chapter numbered 18.30, reading as followst e. .' Chapter 18,30 MAI 1 STREET COMMERCIAL ZONE (C-3M) x, Sections. ,,:,, 18.3o,olo Permitted uses. . 18.30,020 Conditional uses ,''', 18,80,030 Lot requirements, ` 18.30,040 Setback requirements, N ,•;, 18,30,060 18..30,050 Euilding height.. ,' l8300 Additional requirements. %' 18 .30.010 Permitted uses. No building strudtures or ,f land `s'Eid a use ar no adding or structure shall here 1, after be erected, enlarged or altered in the C-31v Zone ex- ,,'; cept for the following uses t ORDINANCE 104 75 - ',',P.,,, ,.. s, .- -w4 , ( 1) Any use permitted in a C-4zone; +> ` w• ( 2) Ap;1 fiance store (incidental repairs only) ; oaf w' )' ( 4) }3luepx�.ntzng� 1•' 3) Ha. P, loan company or other nancial institution; k r,'�, ' ( hotostating o>: other reproduction .=: ' process; :.'h roce s; c, ( 5) Business machines, retail sales and service; ,!: ( 6) ,Commercial schools such as business colleges, t..,i music conservatories and trade. schoo s; ( 7) Department or furniture store; v"... ..4t 8) Film exchange;"'4' ( g) Frozen food locker (family use only) ; cit �yi xr; (10) Motels; t. , Instruments, scientific or professional (repair •,,,:', shop) ; , (12) Jewelry store; i,,4.; (13) Medical-dental clinic; (14) Motel; ;;'.. (15) Newsstand,• , (16) Professional or commercial office building;' ,.''t (17) Real estate office; . Record shop; , x, (18)9drive-in) ; (19) Restaurant (except �,. ' (20) sporting good store; I.04 ill' (21) Variety store. (Ord. 72-70 §1, 1972; Ord. 70-32 , r„.'. §140-1,. 1970) . , , .. j y Uses are permitted oas conditional. '�;��; .� 18..30 .020 . Conditional..uses. In the a ' ,.� uses and them. accessory u p �4 ____ �� ing F �' uses when in accordance with Chapters 18.72 and 18.84 ; ,' ( 1) Any conditional use as permitted in a C zone'; ;.. (' 2) Amusement enterprise, including billiard or pool°= boring arena, dance hall, p public swimming r hall, bowling alley, ?,.' pools y 3) Auditorium, exhibition hall or other public assembly; , , ' Automobile and trailer sales area; } e't, ( 5) Automobile parts, accessory sales; 6) Automobile repairs painting and upholstery; i n” ( 7) Catering establishment; ,,.;; 8)' Churches and accessory uses; s ( Cestablishment; (10) esti . (public) ; F �� Colleges; y i, (p • �,,4, (lay Community buildings feting goods and services dim in (12) Drive--in business o waiting parked motor vehicles; " �� recta) to customers :,, (13) Indoor, outdoor and other theaters; .,;1 (13) (14) reed store; ' :t., Governmental structures or land uses not including vt` '' school ; ,:t d (16) Hospitals, convalescent, general, ,'n • age (11) Hotel (residential) ; , } i.,. (18) �,ibraries; . ,ii'`, (19) • Lodges, fraternal organizations; r,`�: (20) Lumber yard v; ` (21) Museums; �;1; (22) Parks and playgrounds (puhlid) „ (23) Pelt shop; w .',� ( (24) Plumbing, electrical or general contractor and ' 5f., �I shop; `":, (25) Printing shop and newspaper publishing; Pi i" F y Y] �1 club; PS (21) ]radio or h�.l�. service; (28) aec an !o (2 ) ` e , tii lgprsclubs and ndi y , + other activity whose patronage, membership or attendance i i restricted as to age, ate group or other specific limitation; , ,t oRDxNAIVCE No, 75-,11 .-2," ,, . 'i is (u • N'. / •'A,4," 4 41. 1 ,Y�t ...fin ''''..",'w r}^wn»' r a1, '77 r ,”'' l':,;r a ,1,,<r^^..7h, .h 1 , mnrefi.`, ,o-"y t i' Y d,':' r': • ss r Y, r• r. fir (30) Tire shop; "4!,i (31) Veterinarian's office or animal hospital; Y Yet, � (32) Any business, service, processing, storage or: ,ts{, ( display essential or incidental to any permitted use in the r,r�,, C-3M zone and not conducted entirely within an enclosed ..:: building. (Ord. 74-49 g1, 1974; Ord. 72-70 S2, 1972; Ord. ,,. 70-32 §140-2, 1970) . �r;• , 18.30.030 Lot requirements. In the C--3M zone the lot !tir requirements shall be as follows: • } (1) The minimum lot area shall be six thousand square " feet; � 4'r (2) The minimum lot width shall be sixty feet; "YL', " (3) No maximum lot coverage shall be required, (Ord. )',' 70-32 6140--3, 1970) . L''°k 18.30.040 Setback requirements. Except as may other- ,':' wise be provided in Section 18.12.100, the setbacks for non-- ; ; residential uses in the C-3M zone shall be as follows: 1 `�V (1) The minimum front yard shall be ten feet, land-- Jr': w,`; soaped and maintained; 't'4',' (2) No side yard setback shall be required„ except when k�, abutting a residential zone, a Side yard of five feet shall P Yn i J, „ be required; 0*, t ,, (3) No rear yard setback shall be required, except when abutting a residential zone, a rear yard setback or twenty- ;: five feet shall be required. (Ord. 72-34 64, 1972; Ord. 70-- {r.yY, 4..q,* 32 6140--4, 1970) . ' sr,,' 18.30.050 Building` height. Except as otherwise pro- " vided n Sect n 18.12.110, no building in the C-3M zone shall .,*,,i, exceed a height of three stories or thirty-five feet which- ;'rt`' ever is less. (Ord. 70-32 6140-5, 1970) . 1.8_.30.060 Additional requirements. Additional require-- i meats app, ica. e to t e C- M zone include but are riot limited ',,,,Y.‘, to the following: i', (1) Off-street parking and loading, see Chapter 18.60; ZF . :! (2) Access and egress, see Chapter 18. 4; Fy (3) Enclosure and screening required, see Section 18.12,080; bYY,; Sgns, advertising signs and sign structures shall be subject to the conditions, limitations, prohibitions and Y`+� requirements of Title 16, to which particular reference is '",f,'''. made: (5) Nuisances prohibited, see Section 18.12.070, (Ord. 1'+‘" 71-4 g7 (part) , 1971; Ord. 70-32 §140-6, 1970) . Secti.ori 5: Each lot, tract, parcel Of land, or portion thereof, within the boundaries of the Main Street commercial. rY,,,'" zone, as designated, depicted and marked on the attached nap, .,, ''',i designated > xhibit "A", and by this reference, made a part hereof, '..., is hereby classified for use and limited to the uses hereinabove ,Y'1 C of this ordinance and the applicable provisions and prooeur rr + ,._ applicable subject ' of to the requirements'dares of r �r t ,Forth with respect to said z sa the City of Tigard Zoning ordinance of 1970"i as amended and as � r' hereby further amended, as codified in Title 18 of the Tigard Municipal Code, as heretofore or hereafter amended and supple- ' mented, and said official. map shall be and remain on file as a y) part of this ordinance at all times in the office of the City `.N' Records,. x,,t .8- „'',1 `ri:s ORDIW114CS 140. 75 ,/a�',_.._ ” «. ,.... .,ei+in 1f4M'L,.+'M.4 IR,±w o"�^rrk,Kmrex ":.,Y.. ....y.Tr c^.*r n^^+^*"^vr*v+'F+^^M'rM d. rtN%• :" .,, ,... ., - Y ?`", SECTION 6: This its Ordinanceeshall be eland effective on the 31st day after �' „e passage g by signature of the Mayor. ,r „, r? PASSED: • read t ree times y number and title only, By �,, , . Grote of all Council memberspresent, e+ after eit� by rely, ,,. this o' day of h f2 x? a 1975. 1 f r S' ! Recor er - o gars , 41,4;' 1^ r,i SIGNED: By the Mayor, this Gam, : day of ...i �r2L , a 1975. . 4 4 'ti.''': x 7 ' F ' or - City of gar i Is tia> Moi^ :i �,tib. ",'.'1, r.OM1 :: ir XI'J ' 1i rr, MAM 1, .1 otWI 1ANCE No, 75.e,2 rsr,_ ” '�' !R r 4 , 4 4" w #` +� ,,.,�n.... -,-,,r., . +awymMna,wui..i N wr • .Sr"nle t wmg! w.,,xn±re,. »`+-n+en .... '°C.M r-"'.YmmARF,,. Ne ,•,,,,,,k,44,4,0,,,,,,,,,,3�* , ...,n•" ^..: t , i. „e »r a i•", . ,t.. �, � x 4 r 34 til t .. 2 41,4 4;,:i., w �,ii a •Y*'41.me.,,,,..4�♦'Wim rE.l y'4:✓ 1, ” .. `rn 'w it,:' N .....t:au".. L 4-,,..f, cP i�4:;'',174-44:04,`,:t,:. ,t 1 r .} .. : .. . ell ✓J - It ,yt n,:i Illirr a /v F i ............-" id tEli 114, . .i,i.,,oi, .. ..,,,,,:„.. ,:,:.,,,,,,,, , .. � si Iiii*Ap ,q iy H�,�j�t H f Jt ' .m.... ill, . �(t i k�t � i r wit a, I 1 M w ` 11 ! ..,r,,,.<, , . --4°'''400'.... 1111,4Nit4• v;,,,, .„...,, --,,,,,,v,.; it i01' f y Afi,,.;; • r y. '''',7.4,,, r t F, �i' '111,44F{',4 :?1,,;,,,-----...t.sj-p,e. moor :A11411 ,„:„..,,,,:,,,•,'•'''''' ' st, .tv,/ ,,,,,,.,iori,-,,, ,,.,,,,, --,.g•r,.. • illit. fj -- . ..•,••• o ?•:•.1,:,1'':‘, ;'.;' 41fifAbowill* lillt . ; ''''' •4,r,:•;,... '......,... -.qv* 40111P' ..,,,;',A•'''''' 1, 4111P iiiiir 4:110 ' . . , 4, `` ✓ :'t1111:,, lAys i u a ,./•,1,•'''' G'j(%,,..:::':1';' „ tM ;H,'4 '' 1 I I 0 I 0:4 0 4 11441;. ' C> r,,',:itt, ,:,-.."..,,,, 1 N .....i„:.., . ,,.i,;,,,:,. .'''• , --,:i-,,,,,..•.,:;, ,,,.,,,...•,.. .,,,,I,,,,,,:, ., i 1th! 1 40 K' 44111411"N 41k ro, �11 „ ,,,.::;.,,, N,'..7 '.' AP 4* ,ir 4 -'','- 1.4,,,.,.. -411kIt , •i: n i'!!''' •wIr t ' 4. . t + lH, ` 2 ..„., S . • , (''ice 1 Nr �,y 'J Kf wy4 ,, i • .ti � i, 41t',,,, ''';'11111:".4 1�y i '4:',',2:',',. ,+ itt 4Pfrt ~`."w\ .,,i;;::'' 't',',,1.K,-. :,-,11. dy e'�i,�; ,r {` 11 AA r ,,,.. ..,,•• 440 i K ' {1 .',1.',14,5: d{il�� , Vii.. 4*4iIPP .i1 , ��V.y. ,,,,,.. , 110,40„,„, ,.„. . f11111 ' {S i 1 I` dl i , K i( ,,44, / ,,I,''',1.1t:: 'r.; ,q \1, ,:.. a ri ,l 4 R , A&' '.A1116. ' , s ' ;,;:.,.,j ' . A t... r tordolirr. ilip , , 4 4....,„ . r,."-'1/4 s\: ' d ....A 11'o,.,7,4'..4,!.i..”.' , , , Iiiihib, , 400,401. „,,,, / ,......., .,„......,,, ,..,,,, ,.,..,,,-„,,, L ,, --- 0 11% '. r,.r ' i.,::.,,,,;,,.:,? . ,. # A6 41111)• i to; ,,,, .. , , \ P:-...**\''---"- ''. .'"' ' ''O.,''''.'',,i'''1.;:,::,.:j 1r ' EX 1-1 1 5 i-r it A'' ( . , , , i . ,:. ri, ,,, 4,. . '' . - ,,, 46 4 44t41*' ' 40 tq, , rr 1 yy 'f. Jl lr':*,- ' 1, # 411tt . .,,„, . .. , , , , oRri -i ,18 '- 4 y w^ IPPL.'' '" 6 1 ° w v, ... ...w...L..e.ws ,..., w, .0 a.sa"rites , L •a,... tft'r rd; by ,i h :'• ,,ii r r CITY OF TIGARD "1 1, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ie. { {,. Notice is herebygiven that a public hearing will be held by the City Council at. New Fowler Junior High Lecture Room, 10865 S. W. F" t'V Walnut, on June 9, 1975, at 8:00 P. M. with respect to the following: E:: Proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Tigard, creating a new zone, (C-3-M) differentiating t° between General Commercial (C-3) properties located on is �''' Pacific Highway and those located in the Main Street area. a: i,e, An appeal of a May 27, 1975. decision by the Tigard Design ' Review Board, approviTAg the site development and ,.I plansj r a McDonald°s s drive-in restaurant ,{ architectural fo . , ``' facility on S. W. 1 i is Highway between School. Street ,„ and Park Street (tax ma 251, 2CB, tax lot 300). ' All interested persons may appear and be heard in favor of or against '`' the said proposal. ;� BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL '; ;,:'' Doris Hartig ,;r. City Recorder , , TT publish June 5, 1975 i• 'r { VO% i F ;f r ti 1 !t1 fX• .., n: .. .. :. '.1,3113/. . C „ ; r..... - 3,,, N"1G7'flt.4.ur•.+r,aw,Y+nfXw, rw•+� 1nyn•t"rf""n'MaM; «rFnn*q!S�eS3fd*nm}n,M'�i4>UilklFi •�ZbN' rafi V {°,N' yw.'0.. 1 4 r ., 3 eA '". tr r, ''. 4 *'. r,n 5 4i w tiI, k Y 4 R y,i Memorandum h 'to i, , ; Too Planning Commission y Y�; { From: Planning Department uj. r,.. Subject: C-3M Zoning District Dtrict for the Downtown Area t+ • is II WPi4 a..: Date• May 23, 1975 >,•; • ,�: Ir 1N,. ' Commission meeting, staff presented a At the May 20, 1975, Planning IxN proposed C-3 zone Pacifier ate o the downtown ntow Planning ro osed division of the existing ; from. the revised zone being considered forbystaff describing why ry f''• Commission agreed with the findings presented ''': the downtown areashould be in a separate zoning district than commercial �1', however, there was disagreement concerning properties on Pacific Hwy. ;�iit„ gh site should fall under the proposed {', whether or not the Fowler Jr.�T �< .� issing ,`this •matter, the major dis- {3a � C�-3M zone. In the process of di.,'w ' zoning for the Fowler site. � cussion revolved around the appralw.r`�.ate ri` �� placing proposed and. . a representative s entatave { p .. Planning Reaso�ls for lacin the ro• osed C-3M zone on the Fowler site, as ; „; expressed by four of the ,�j "`' from the School District, can be summarized as follows: ' ti Jrts.. - 1, The City should° cooperate with other governmentalbodies, in ' this case the School District, and put Fowler in the C--3M t Not to do so could make the site more z ,e category as requested. , :. difficult for the District to sell. 2. `.phis site is part of the �'downtownft, having frontage on Main it 1}i • ' � � � s � • �I•�a `! r. S t• .. .,. and on Scoffins and should. therefore be included inthe '' t. ss 4 ! C-3M zone m thea r;:: .r1 fi�� fb.r The Fowler site should be considered. differ ently fro : , �/ Buchholz property because it has access to Hall Blvd. from . � > ' The Buchholz site only has access to iitafrr�xmately'�_ ;4,' rr r"E`r � SCof.l.vLnO• + r> ; he Fowler site could pp ' ° ! Pacific Hwy. � Therefore, ,the while the Buchholz site C--3 V,. zoned C--3M, ✓ Commissiono s present felt Buchholzsites should ;,, Planning �'. staff and half of the Planning. both be sep�lr.ate from the The ' '� that the Fowler and .1 ; Ca-3M category and the following reasons were provided. ' ',.„ :t bi1. Both the Buchholz and Fowler sites are large parcels of r r ,,, developable commercial land directly accessiblefrom Pa cific . Hwy. , either end of Main St. where it intersects beingat ' Pacific Hwy, The development of these sites has serious . ,',' . . mplications for both `the f>�ture of Main St . and Pacific 1.,'„:,',.:' ', For instance, either cif the sites ,,,�s Hwy. at this location. + i Y r s which fi rt� ►i could bedeveloped into high traffic generatinguses h may necessitate p Commission review it order to assure ��, � � ate Planning Co Yprovided. lt,, "`' that safe and efficient vehicular access can be to In. w these sites should both be developed in order on . F,,; com.::li nt the "downtown00 as conceived in the iNP0 #1 Plan n compliment notwould bedetrimental to its economic in a manner that '; �' � totallyoriented- ,. viability. Both sites should be developed in an integrated,p fashion with the rtdown-town.ii, rather than beingd t . alco Y + y r I ' >, The review capabilityoffered,, to Pacific Hwy " . Y dit oval use process will aid: the Planning. Commission in «w IM w r � +��nnM4,;tr. 3mfK„A(..nrdr•9°iL�f'Hn«r;J1rpa+11 .,,r- ,,,„,,,,,."^..MrtV"r'” hWPbl '" Y Nf ti` 1 G i dWtrlC4fV W M v;.1 6 '"! ,Y'. «^{'. : ""'^*^�"^,"'+'�"•a`C'",r',.m.. 4!"`.^d`firta.,pi+#^�"r5!�+"^"6rx"f •fir.,,:._. "",ova"'1""(a"""r`"fi'w"i�l r _ . . .. ., .. ,. I (q 1 MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 20, 1975 — REGULAR MEETING TWALITY JR. HIGH SCHOOL 14650 S.W. 97 TH AVENUE, TIGARD, OREGON / ' 1. CALL TO ORDER.: The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:40 PM. .• Porter, Ball, Hartman, Nicoll, Popp, 2. ROLL CALL: Commissioners Sakata & Whittaker present; Staff Powell, Bolen. City Attorney Anderson. Commissioner Hansen arrived late. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES . Minutes of May 6 were not yet finished.irlutes that he had Porter asked deletion of statement in m scheme -- Chairman Whittaker gg ` proportional voting r suggested a directed staff to review the taped minutes and make appro-- pri ate changes. COMMUNICATIONS: ♦ Chairman Whittaker directed the agenda to be amended to consider Item first. 6. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (NPO #4 & #5 Delegate Selection Process) A. Staff Report: Bolen read a memoranda from• staff recommending a method . .r and process for NPO delegate selection. The methodology used by staff and the voting rights of i members was disctllssed by the board. ' B. Public Testimony & Discussion 1. Pate. Warner, resident of 72nd Street asked clarification hi of NPO ,#5 status. 2. Mike Oberho "f er (Farmer' s Ins. ) spoke in favor of the � s t'. proposed membership distribution. 3. Fred Fields (Coe Mfg. ) asked how the distribution had been arrived at. Bolen responded that the process Was 1st to establish the ): + numberofof membersinsure participation ion of ea ch . yi affected interest group by designating a delegate chair, rem by proportional nttntbers the remaining then to assign •_ chairs taking care to avoid probable tie vote situation,6 +reM,www+rrwiwrnmrnviwrwh.vurwNr,.W M+ nr+vv4rYur,e,-v r.F.-.. .,., •• ,..r ✓.. .- °tr4pY*+1'pm ..°.r.+ •.:••••,_..••.••-•' ,-»..»e-.,••w.•»...•• «,...w„H,xrrr,}win^rowaukNmrCsma+�,xr..auo,'4:w,+r.5n=uaw.wr+wow.w.A,wwtad�.. ^ "'rrr tixy Page PC Minutes May 20, 1975 4. Mr. Warner asked if the groups would meet together or remain independent. Bolen responded they could handle' meetings either way, but that that would be largely up to the NPO's. 5. Chairman Whittaker spoke to the difficulty that the commission had had with previous NPO formations 6. Mr. Pields said he was interested and wanted more information. 7. Mike Oberhoffer asked if the NPO plan would invalidate the "Triangle Plan" and if a new plan could be more speedily adopted that the Triangle Plan. 8. Chairman Whittaker said the coramission.preferred a "citizen generated" plan. C. Commission Action: - Con:ensus was that the process and method developed by staff `�ota.],d meet the needs in the .sub jsubject NPO' s and would meet re- quirements for citizen participation. 4. PUBLIC NEARING S 4.1 Conditional Use CU 9-75 (Lawrence Whitaker) A request by Lawrence Whitaker to allow a cabinet shop as a conditional use in a C-.3 zone at 13565 CW Pacific Highway , (Tax Lot 600, Wash, Co Tax Map 281 2CC. ) f Rep ort: Read by Powell A. Staf ll (dated May ,$) B. Public Testimony Whitaker � n his o��n behalf 1. Mr. nth` tostiftied o �' (apPx�.oa introducing a site plan and addressing conformance with the comprehensive plan. . f Marshall) spoke on d onf ormanc e of the ro j ' 2 doe ec�uw'�� ther�ire code. P No one spoke in opposition 4i Staff reoomiliended approval. ' C Con ri1 ssioir r iscussiori & Action: The comr' ission discussed parking with the applicant Ball asked the applicant if he could oarry the neoes6ary insurance. • �f+�^++^ s.aWnn++r w.no�,�w...,.,.,,...k.0 . .x..;,...., ,. , ,.-.., .-, .';;: .. .... ... .4.. .:q.,pr.,nn;te;Wp.sbltne nymopYmeuo.,„xt+Mn+.r.wiar+:.r..dw .r. 1 j , ,.. Page 3 PC Minutes May 20, 1975 • Motion for approval (Porter), • ;:Seconded by Hartman. . Carried by unanimous vote. 4.2 Conditional Use CU 7-75 (Randall Construction Co. ) r A request by Randall Construction Co. to allow multiple conditional uses in an Industrial Park (M-4) zone on a 5.56 acre parcel at 8900 SWWBurnm. Street, known as "Security Storage" (tax lots 2200. and 2300, Wash. Co. taX map 2S1 2AD) ; previously tabled. A. Staff Reports . • •r Powell read staff report citing memorandum from City Attorney. • Anderson explained his opinion more fully-. V. • Ball asked. Anderson if he meant that the applicant Would 4, • have to ask the Planning Commission for modification of his Conditional Use permit for ever:, change in use, intra-project shafting of tenants, rerodeloing, addit Lon, etc. that he (the applicant) under took. • Anderson said that generally that would be true -- a condition,- al use permit is a pecific permission to do something in • a particular place and under certain conditions. B. Public Testimonyy 1. Steve Mosinski (Randall Construction Co. ) reiterated their request and said that the applicant Would agree to: a. Place limits on kind and Scale of the tenant bUeiness. b. Strictly control location Within the building of inconpatable tenants. c. Redesign the. parking layout per a site Map (lixhibit G) r so that approximately 96 cars could be parked. ,1 ; d timit number of occupants to 20 establishments. 2. Joe GreUlich entered his letter into the records (Exhibit fit) .. No one spoke ih opposition. 4 ,. wl Staff recobn�eridatio�r read b.",yPo e llt« Denial of the conditional use request, but allowing stora ge as a conditional use in buildings A and ti (the smaller ones) only, and requiring the following conditions to be net bythe occupant of building C. ....-.. t r'I .F,rr....e. r .. .. .. .,, .., e, ,,�H/ r lZ J✓a:rrppra(. n✓•M.mIN..xU,.+:1Sr.».r........w rTa. .i:=W.0 ..rwrnn+.w:.....++o+u,+uaw'OPfRYtPfhMMIWAB'"tre(4[IT YYrYai"hhY,lAit' F'diK"' 9.-YM�n,.'Y� •. , Pa geJ( t + cu,�- �.cw . ,.., PC Minute s.1 ,.t May 20, 1975 1. No less than 1500 sq. ft. of continguous floor area may be leased to any one tenant. 2. No more than 20 tenant spaces may be leased or used ' concurrently. 3. The maximum floor area employee/floor area ratio shall be One employee (occupant) per 600 sq. ft. of gross leased floor area. 4. No fire wall shall be penetrated by doorways, ventilation ducts, windows, or any other opening. or customer service 5. No retail or wholesale sales actives purely r to be' conducted on site excepting that urely incidental ' to a permitted use. 6. No outside storage of materials, vehicles, waste or debris will be permitted on site. 7. , No overnight parking of vehicles will be allowed. than one nameplate of less than 10 sq. ft. , 8, No more mounted flat on the building w all above the window line will be permitted for each enterprise located in said building. 9. The project shall be resubmitted to the Tigard Design Review Board for approval of a new site plan and land- scape plan following the applicant's redesign of - access, parking, landscaping and screening andprovision of appropriate screened locations for solid waste collection. Such additional_. l improvements as may be .. required by the Design Review Board shall be executed before any additional occupancy may be permitted in the a project: sign standards and. criteria to be applied by the De 1 S esigneReview Board will be such that: D 1. Length , g asphalt areas are broken upor , din' s and m sked at appropriate intervals. .� a pP P 2. Adequate parking is provided such that a parking slot is available on a one per each employee of maximum p . .�,.� allowable employment� and at least one addtid�tal s per each establishment all parking to be appropriately designated. 3. Adequate maneuvering space is available for each operational loading. .a� door. ' to. SW Burnham will be redesigned to reflect 4. Approac : , the needs of the changed use. propriate sight obscuring screening is p o.,,v ided.6. An irrigation system adequate to ensure survival of all landscaping is provided. C. ,doxnm ss on biscUssion and ,Action: . Popp asked the applicant why they had proposed offices and restrooms in each space In the building. Applicant responded that it had been done for f1exabiity' Ball stated that he fele the staff recotomendation e cceeded. icant had asked and that •the coTI1mission could what the appl .4s..wa r,.A,.ukwu.r der au.a.N1h11�o++MM.xMruay.f'Y',.ww.:..,.:,..,•-w.,.... ».W.+.+....naw..b.`»..•......uww,nm.+,e.w�w+FM•, unv�f7dlkrc7,.ihc,ANfnu ad4W.k�.. . �,. ... ... .i, ,.,,:... T. Ira Page 5 `r ,. w PC Minutes May 20, 1975 • only rule on the applicant's request. a Motion for Denial (Hartman). • Seconded (Hansen). • Carried. 4 , 4. 3 Zoning ordinance Amendment ZOA 1-75 ' !` A request to amend previously considered ZOA 1-75 to include the creation of a new zone designation for portions of the C-3 zone o and amending general provisions to �nfexrerSt� ons on high traffic generating establishments (referred by Council) . A. Staff Report on C--3(M) Proposal: 1. Bolen read staff~ report. 2. Chairman asked that the staff recommendation be read ' inasmuch as this was a legislative hearing. 3. Staff recommendation approval of the changes referred. 4. Chairman Whittaker explained further what the status of ZOA 1--75 was at the Council level. . B. Public Testimony; •• - BOb Greenwoodtestfiopposition to designation ignat ion of the "Old Foler" site as part of theC38i hway) zone A , rather, than identifying it With Main Street. C. Commission Discussion and Action .. 1Chairman �►hittaker asked commissioner Hansen f he was intend,- ing to participate in the discussion in view of election to the School Board. 2. i Hansen stated that his election- was not official and that he Would participate. ' ' i 3. Porter said he felt the school Site Was indeed part of Main Street: 4. Bail disagreed. 5 „ Hartman pointed Dull the anew" 0-�.3 zone (pacific Highway) was most appropriate for large sites yet Undeveloped and that pp p� the PoWler site should be pUt with the 0-3 (Highway). 3 Ilp., 6 Hansen said that he felt the staff had been biased by the City's unsuccessful bid for money to build a civic center on, the site pointed out that the civic center project had not been�� Bolen nor was the staff necessarily ro ect a p .a.rinirag Departrdent p cfir' ,.4 M enam xrr.. er.»s ,• •• .::'• ,•y w+K-"MTM.r•rw,»..•r........«.-..0 ' rfYKawIT'M3WY,aC4n'Gct4vzGvu..R,.ue.i+'V •. -, .. •, ,:...,. .;,. ,c ..�.•eryr ,.ya+ i.an:,rc .x..,,,.._r... ... r, ... r .r,.•nw+, W' p,ur.ifm"MRh.�•,,. Page 6 PC Minutes ' .: - May 20, 1975 • in favor of that particular development«concept. 8. Whittaker pointed out that such a center would have been a conditional use, and would have had to go through ,the • same process that a shopping center or grocery store would have to go through, and that as far as community development Main,`gas concerned,Heared, property at the south end of t. School Diste Bucholz property ro arty at the north end are � p the ' and the two most significant sites inTigard, and ought to be treated carefully. 9. Motion to adopt as drawn (Ball) . Second (Hartman). 10. Motion to amend to include Fowler site in Highway designated area (Hansen).• Seconded (Nicoli) • Question (Ball) Failed - (tie tote, lacked majority) Nay •- Ball, Hartman, Sakata, Whittaker 114 Question, original motion (Whittaker) . Failed ,- (tie vote, lacked majority) Nay - Hansen, Niooli, Popp & Porter 12. Hansen said he felt that the City owes the School District some cooperation. 13. Motion to table to the 27th of May for consideration at a study session. (Ball) Seconded (Popp) " 14. Po � said he feltthat the Main Sheet area was more in need of "protective zoningtt than the Highway. 15. Question (Sakata) Motion carried, (Hansen against) D Staff Report on the "high traffic generators" amendment. ▪ Staff report was read by Bolen. • City Attorney Anderson pointed out an ambiguity of the gg proposed ordinance and suggested that it,be tabled until . after the election on the proposed charter amendment. • E. Public 'TeOtimony No one wras preent to speak. • • page 7 �� PC Minutes .:; May20, 1975 F. Commission Discussion and Action: Hartman said he disagreed with Mr. Anderson - that he felt it ought to be dismissed. Chairman Whittaker said he felt it ought to be opposed V actively' ' by the planning commission. Motion to, table (Bali) Seconded ('Hansen) , Carried t�ananimous) t, . Whittaker said the question was whether the commission ought, to go on record`. opposed to the proposed ordinance revision and the proposed charter amendment . Chairman polled the comMiSsioh, Porter disagreed. a Chairman asked the City Attorney to read the memorandum, he kk Ri had earlier alluded to. _. cion could go on record Ballosuggested that the commis ppballot measure (charter amendment)bas.d� on its. e` , . „ the ; ia�gs that then, t.as>,a`potential. �.egaW pr....;,.m and that it was conceived wi`thou't proper consideration of P� P land use criteria. Moved (Ha �rtman) Seconded . (Sakata) Carried (Porter against) 5. SUBDiVISIQG S 81-74 Prelinilnary Plat Approval A request for approval of a preliminary plat for Phase III;, ` Summerfield Planned Development, located at rind near S.W. Highland Drive and 109th Avenue. Staff A. Report: Powel- - Staf toport by - - � co�zrendatioza for. . �� withxe app roval Subject ect toaconditions of gC 5-=72. ' 8 Y C L ' AttiSsion bisrusson and Action; Moved to appi'ave (Hartman) Seconded (Hansen) Carried (vhabitout) 7. 0R BUSINESS None lir- 84 ADJOURNMENT 11:30 P`M j ,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,w,•_,,,„,,,,,,„„„:,„...„,,„„,,,,,,..„: ,.r..e«�u.»w ��.:. ,..., 1 'SI '�l+'`ri1M`8+M'iYa3nraUtAlMJA7'1'✓.4'tltiHAlti'4.1b'�+t'DcYrQALwbph OW1'KY�.'{"'.i... .. :..A Y .•.��. . �. • , (I , ( ,,.i „1 ::: Staff Report Tigard Planning Commission ' Agenda Item 4.3 May 20, 1975 ZOA 1-75 Zoning Ordinance Amendment • A modif ioa.tion of the original ordinance amendment to revise � : . the C-3zone R Applicant City of Tigard , • leant_ s Requestt .. The Tigard City Council, in considering the revision of the ested ,, and Planning Commission, has su ,g sone as proposed by,the Tigard .. zone only app y to Properties located onPacific ha•t lp . P that the revised p ies in the Main St. area remain under Highway and tr roper•t,,provisions. • the existing C-3` zoning StaffFindings 1. As the , s . ion of the C-3 zone the " recall reva�s cin i y Commissioners will . scion to be nee r due to tl�p found by the PlannngG m�. on Pacific Highway, r such as high traffic c.lrcumstances existing a generd1 development pattern ... curb sbe in conflict with the objecti.� . volumes, numerous cur 1 ' w ''V e s round by the CommissionCommun.:�t. Plan and the specific plans . . and purposes_ of the Tigard y . formulated by the citizens of Tigard, in the NPO planningprocess. Sof ac p findings included that continued use Pac result f oP both local shopping and arterial transportin its becoming ming nonfunctional, that arterial rterial commercial land could be accomodated withinappropriate limitations and tat the h e continued well being of the OtofTl and depended largely on appropriate development of the highway. As a result of the a., unique planting - �, s on Pacific Hwy. ,, , .q � presenting themselve ,4. Commission revised the C-3 zone according to the following • the C objectives ' A, Control the placement of high traffic generating land use. Provide site design criteria Which .mine traffic zc �.11 nni B. conflicts and improve highway appearance and compatibility with adjacent residential development. . C niscourage the placement of neighborhood convenience commercial wheremay . , an inappropriate mixture 't result in �. ,' of local shopping traffic and through traffic, Allow placement of commercial profession al office us es in locations specified most appropriate forthat use bythe. ted NPO' . dns and the Tigard Community Plat,adopted. p ��/ — _--.1,y ♦ "'" T"'wn''+',Mrra+r'a'Ydw.r8i! +A tiN W {kiw rr...w..h'y,.. ' •. i , . .,, , , ,, . k ( • 2. In that the Planning Commission found it necessary to revise 1 the C-3 zone due to the specific problems existent on Pacific Highway, the City Council, in their deliberations on the pro-- posed revision, questioned whether this should apply to the Main St. area which does not represent the same situation as seen on the highway. Main St. is a commercial street intended to provide access to commercial properties serving the community. In contrast to Pacific Hwy. , its function is not to carry through arterial traf f ic 3. The NPO #1 Plan, which is the adopted "Comprehensive Plan" for the downtown area, states that the downtown should function as a retail-commercial, governmental and community center for the citizens of Tigard. Most significant is the fact that the downtown is intended to provide a neighborhood convenience shopping function in direct contrast to the discouragement of this kind of activity on the highway. Therefore, the plan's intentions for the down- town are very different than for Pacific Highway. . . , 4The. C--3 revision has been accomplished in such a way as to pro- vide ro-vide the City with a, review capability and as written, does not p Y prohibit outright any uses previously permitted. What it does do, however, as a result of providing this review capability, is add more conditional uses and reduce the number of useeshper- kT rnitted outright. The staff finds that, applied to the St. Acta, thireview capability is unnecessarily encumbering. + ry" v'tr itie which, in staff' s opinion, should be encouraged to aocate on Main St. may be needlessly discoUraged. Of greatest suchbakeries, hardware stores, etc. iTh:e commercial uses significance fare the neighborhood convenience commercial ml Plan the downtown a dsirable location for this type of use. The • staff is concerned that by requiring i.ng a conditional use permit for • such uses when unnecessary, we may: (1) expend unnecessary staff Planning Commission timeto reviewapplication and/or and Pl g the (2) discourage enterprises from locating on Main St. either through the added administrative time and expense or through fear of an uncertain outcome before the Planning Commission. 5. The Planning Director attended ,a luncheon of theTigard Develop- i+,,,, merit Cooperation, an association of Main St., businessmen, where he was asked to apeak on the proposed C-3 revision which the Commission previouslyCity sent to the Council. At this meeting he was informed that the Main. St businessmen were concerned that the prop ,revision was appropriate as it applied to the 'highway osed p,.pro .dp' but did riot serve the. needs of the Main Sty area. Staff, Recoz'mendatiora , Staff recommends that the Main St. area remain under thep resent C-3 zoning category that established as a new zone Called C- 3M and appproperty lied tothehwhich is shown on the .� attached map. :. PC Staff Report - May 20, 1975 -, item L 3 pale • rwYwf.MrW.IM.Mv..w......4tlaa .s..t .u. �. ,. .r r. .....„:...v„,, :, , .......: ._r...........„,...y-....rr.„tara.fi+u—tci 'Y.+aAt�,L.Yi.anewa.M.r„.wwww wrwa„, . I « �' (" .«., •�«--r.,.....,-. -,�,..,.. «..+.�. r � rC ra. 1 r'r.w '+ ai��.:rnr L'r.4 i in 1 +t ..,,, i + R,r rvC r'' ''1, 0•r«a I ,?, 7!/r t a Af 5N t -1M It , ill ""�+ kv 4 zh v Yxw• it ,11,„-:::1 ' n Y..J' I • 5 •F :it:....-.3.':','1%t �~ w L r. 3 ". E,./41,..,4.k.,1:1,1 4l t•� r 3 i.r. »v:. r r .. in . rif u�i�, xr'.�Y r,,}L,Y,��1t,y S 4 t�,a�,�G+t ,•i rr f,I i .r .3J' • �� .N.y.� � �'x.4,+..�AkF,ktfr...(��, `rF;C,�iF,.�:'f7 y,f>4�whit tt •. «R.C..t,.� .1r�.1 ,'1 L{• S•Y r nq Y'tq {i:S.:i 7 a "w d i4 ' 1 irt ',,„ ,,5 ',i}I Ws yrs.,\.,, „,..z.,`ci,..,..h., Lill ``* b't A.. ,/1j' t.'', .� eiStf"V 4tf:w C'iy t 1('. Y r ,_.. i b 4 i jy q ° .y, •1.a tt N '( a r i } • —" - 't' �3'`j}- ...'fy s" ' y'a.s, +' r„i4 4,„„,..1V+!tav•y�' - F.: t.,tre a b Hari;!`' .514”1',Z;%.5+,fi' r•r;'..r°^.."." t, a +r\'� •R C1C410�R+ r rr-a.a ' Q �.. 4.**-5',. ,ik rt"„•!,!S•q,.0fy„-•;r'rr�,°. .. ai . •-.i7*n, *,d w.-,:r-.-.i-e'••, 'ti rale +�i'* `-t• .',. 44:1::-.:0.4--r,s4hr: 7:,ir1'�+ r1 ,.A c t, `4r Nei,} •h,, ia• .*:.1...1,'*L'/..* ry Y F . `4.4. !atP-0:„,i.11 °'yd%i.t?t" byz' r.ip.i..'sr: -h . j '� �.,t xy�• ,�,tYGr:.m rri si k •nn t + tr*k?r�r•'h�•6yi`�,r+.,y`Y�,r 'r,,. t r+- + r tw ",rt i_,1:: Nc.....-1.4,,e;.r4W0c11"(0,;;a7D707,145/4'*:a7,t +�,�`.tts t syi a..; x E`3'.. _. a Sy' t' y'T .7r .i.r w • dd',:dr -Y. -1 . tt, ,,1, a 2}4- .. •�s Y4+-.rY'••'J52 r.a,yr 1r 'ti�.:.r,�,. ,.".r..v.H trn f. ri�',•{l�Wn'!.•.t.r�t+,3+�Jx�rC^"�., - w-.. tf ...+.... t'« Kf • ,„..`� i+',N'.•i • t a 4 ly7r+..2 „/„..y, ..r 1 .. 'j„ , f..,0.y r.. r »iLt: i �,��.., �i A.�z Kx'�"1.sf"�rv�tr .7y, _ __ - . 4 {^+,t i q jf'!f .•��'J ' S v t"i37'tf S ,ir rf r"k_1y h�,, .r RF r iKy s r+_. ._. Ifr'1{ h�v+ ,y .y ta4 w et....y ^4i• .+,. , �. "Y A., r.. }+'t't , a , '+ •:i t. r ttt\, ,..- N t�•f,:{i•,,..a.c 1. ,.aN �, a ai'+ei �' n .., r f r t'1 3 t r s ti• 4r4tei, .'41'i3 L•i'• e 7 r `��f�rt 4x'L FYA.�Y�lM„eLh`��L'3~st P��i ice`"J" �Lr�� -h��rr�a��.�,,,�>fr h��a�,.�.= 1 ',l;t,'.c, lr 11; .Nt ,„ •`:,•4 +y�•�}~ ,k t� ..4& +aslk"7 yIP:ii�'.h.ktL r 1161110 ,r ri,,r 4 LtY_'t w t''' "�•, °r ;7rat.,. jv'N ', z.• d,«Tfr'e;.?,�aa�.: .w:t�L,,'*:„.r:t- < er.4;Y AF 1.�R't'r� rL x�f f 3y��y+l,.lr t•r,i�4t� r w t+ +c �r»rAa�' �cs s Cs�., �.,(•�??��y''t �4`��,�i�,l,�•u�,�va�1,7�..ax��uv''f-?r?.... ,r=w•t : ' '�,.ti�. ,�/. .,y �� ;Yi t —» 'r".'t/.4ve,,,,,, t�^'4,4,741•+",,,Iti t:1„.„4-.° ,er . .. .-�:. .,.- 4 ' Q 'n1i„��'yjw'fr rC C«' i. �� \";".4.- !�, `,/" �• .4 yYy1t%"�-rz. �i1...1'« Lrf i i�Y .5..� .. .. � .. a"'.',Pl 4• t..t..1r641.;::::\)17 L^N.'K/.I'-.' rNt;,•Y .a1 .1 Y�, ,r..1r.Y,t S".i.,4i*,'�*."..p...r�'x.7',°",. r I,'t� �r4;1'`a•;wML" 1. ' •.jr Al: w.•rrr -3. wit et., ,4,� .r•'`•i,",'Ci j°�P'l` ," : •' ..: .. ...�__:� '.. ,•'#is '+'i'�t .'�':, } �+y �ti ::74p, �i5"' •+"' } #t1-7,,,-t,'.a5;t*a .14-.P-1.:*t�t�.�. 11- ., ;.$,, .9i..i` :r':"A•"w:".0 d� •a a .• `ad m..rF!'=x ii"tom`..:,{'! }.,4'i• }S.n • ,, wiwav3nytr�:,:- � �r. wt4t C/,°: `M,,'3,T1 .,.4 r” .!,�.„+ � ''i,' �,,p ,}kt".''wC! t,'?�ar ti..• •i"F:'.fx`:., .„?. `e "'t '� .r a., .,.z.,-.;-.-- .` ., s -.7 t'li'.'r .,z •-,ti;,J"' 'y .,..�.•� \ '! ai ,.• t ' ., :,..0.-1.Z,:,>:1;ur" -'"'"•,..):::.:11::...,c4,.......4.„. '” ,, !r"s-' Y tiiKEu" �„ � v,;.,ti :. Cttr�#^^ ....:. �^ -. udl.'`yrt..»H ar,�'4....P..../".•4'..--- -(�F.�w� � .. •" .-.,;., � ..,-,,,,,,t,..1-4.„,,..-14•.....,-,1,,,14-.4,,,,,,,,-,4:11- . 3t'� f'. rah% '..'... ... 4 a.'` .y' ,';., .•Li'r: .r,.,t.i . , rr Y....:.--,/ . .. ., � � '1��Mt.�.,.f��j+':f•�n;.r•�1,y'•"+1�',” `L.'lr y,4=. y.\�"�„.r�• '�I».._.....,..-/,'...,i. li:�;.a-.'�a�,a�wy 1.�� .j�fi,r••.,.'41':Iv,' M i.0.-Kfek..i.q.. ,r i. ,q.,','/' 'iSr •C i.�..ri:.ki ✓'fi44/ .4* vr„M.t.N r ,y.- .,* ”:-.k t+. ,r�t�'�•r '}�4 lr tx_S,1: ,, rg,;', LX,✓t-4 d1 r w't'C j'.ttt `A7.:':f4t.,,�y i c jS w- ' ',--f fi: ,Z' 'V, �. 4 4111 -A.,.`'�` k .''Ei I"t f t'c r". ar♦ °'.sy .'L+- '.,.E..., .�'rL*» t\ �yS w.:X4 4 ZS ... t t^4i wig `w ,,fiL, },c'• i„d „'41,110,,• " ,,T .tvww rt '�4r�"-fro f i f t 4 u Y• 7 tr,.Y� r��j••+r► �`., »d7`�[""Y't�'w,.,a" �• e � � �• t;t.A'�j,+..'eY.-J• t y.•1"na,ln" Y'� �+S' �+�l t ,4.0". •.u•r ,S,'•'NPa t+a L..rn r�j' fJa�*, ty 1 w IN �' i. fL. i',• p i it0".Y4, r J 4 7" ;1�r•,-..t �{ r iL}-�.,2 t . 44 1 {f tt , W P s d "„Yarn+}T,**4 t r i .. .. •"'.h � � �Ni.,,,R.•{�`J1t->..• Jtig�t�; r,\"y:"�f � r•"ii'i't,, ,'.:,a� � l'•a:�•,,y I t« • z.'�G!tw,!kµt•niw ,,�tY:R�3_f" �3' '. V A � x. gt r t + ..'..s rt..,t K r n ,F 1�'�i' 5 yam.,, `•... ,C' .,, . � ty i�I�.�`,r•�` a ;+A� tf��' t 1� c ,.L ka��,'i� �`4 ,.t�wy7kJ G{,.y,'�''�'""•�'�.t 1 1 S�r �1. a5 t •y�;)�Yr}- �+'CKi,rrs'�r,��"••'r 'ti�ar �R 4.y'�'�a�+�+r^.Akt,.J�'''y�`w�'J•A.i.J,�b td, +!'�.+',�.0.Yl.7¢„'"fit K�`F}�F�;,.”y, !k '1./ * eh�'�+f,,t,,,4w 3 IC rr"l� sd� .t4J.�41rv+4yt:oa F'`,y�rr,A6 .F2' rr ... cB.aGf aT41,4.Z ,ft,, : ip 'j •a , .�tt`��i� q '�4�,},•htt,,w�,k{.•Lr, «A yi ak;y�.w'�'H+�7�"� fid`4�••�.•;,5(r [y,fr�„��,�� ';v+.�x'��:t�,�F�,�r.: t .t.n r t r .Ste. «,ji4t. d',.i 4f :f:.1 -s N tw ., .».A,..a' '�t.-t "`" L a +3!'j } i'�'. .,v �,r�_w 1 ,t'' r• S! ,a ' `�. 4,.> „:• {Y” j .W M+ 1.f.. y..4'..,'• qV J; 'f,..y �.:Y' '$'�`,�T �, + 4•NJ A td„L"1a -t A� ,„- t•t YY' 3 t Y 47 1T . _ . ":::y:::(1+ I it, a yt�+iri.:/l t,et(y i �•z,:yj e 4 •N r 7r.1 'l ,jzi_'. cy, « ;n, _*',.......4 j' ^,r a: y,s d5« G°'r 4+#.4?txi... . �,• ^M !,.. ,.: :. •, i!'" ,r .24,.., .z ryy.d i1 ..IA i +"r, '�«rr' z "r .,„ r 4 x 3•n„ "? t„A. n ,,.,.. ti��.�r"{,yr.`,,.`�A''',�,.�['''�J�,.�}yi.,y�,��M11�5�Tt<'"�^. $`{°y�«U{��"�:��a=- 4r j: i*1.2.5fy�'q¢!.t•µ+ ,'� a:lt`•'..�+f� '„\•4.r�.C'Ti,!r>j*'1�:.0 t,..t.ni:�,'C�u' . `Olip , 1 ,"�/'.,�'t°rY tz�''.sZ Sr#...)v f4/1 •�,, ir s�t'F'ra4t''�'�'.r"��',I• k,�uJ"``d5'Gj,3 '"•t f" i' tykrF t:i 7�t'N'1L 1 `'al��Y" ?x '', uYi.��wa 11�i!'a7nr'yCy r?�; �•�' get't. I i. r'"5d 1., 'to'P' u�4.,5+� 'f•1V.4 tI Y« 3w +,w.A@�'�'�•"^'+'�+'�{3 rUks•. .f+�.,L, a.f y5,,.,�t'f +C.n 1 n,�'t`�5`'I„yY.t1��...ja°i. rc�. c1t1.,ax M. .3.Yn".}i? `S,j ,ty is.,4,;{i Y1'' rg: i*.'kt cgt).t�v;.t 4+�i1/, .11: '441?rM,v k'"'M y e' Lx r^4a\rr •f ,�^tt,r,.�E'N.u4Fin '1. �^P r.{.�'(GYtitA � +,far"r11 4+a5Ya i.rwK+ ,,I; ,+:ro;.. 5 .iil:11�s,,.S°x`P' fljw A 1 ,' 7�. P , ..a' t•}.,r , x9 ,'}v?41,w 7,Yty Y*/'...,4•''';'4".;.P.,1::`,1',,4•ay�.;.„w 1-” (,�./' . ,ty.,,Wi w rt irry rt'..r �lr'�:sr� ?,��'' 4 1j++ q nLd�}�" • } ' wvtA R11 -.t"` x1',�Y .1� +1;1r�i"v.3'frt+ It re'�..h '+t'.;;i�. r�.n• a '- . In ierm.... -,..... . , ,4411100 4,4S �lam, k ..,(3',4 .„,,„C t n �.r tF�a i«' Jai s tint 404. 4 f �, r 1 t 4. / \t ,, 3i,y,,.. 3" .., diSO ,-Se, 18, jI •l NI .... ,,,,c40, ,,,t.,, P.a i,i,a ! a v4110. ir,. ., Ls, r •1 S� . , , • . ..„... ^,w,,;r 8 y`y4,w a. a rs'.'•' . 1 . it } ry r ,..ate ." \,. n, !.. .G� is•. . • \J e• ')/ 11‘, *Y , t ,4. ::.'.1,„"?. ,---",,....*t•uNt, . N\/ ' 0 r'wlYw S+ r•w• '4 to" . a r.Y r}'Fo,Y„ti+f09.Y,� ty e.fir' • « / :a L7 y7. , I, 6 r '. . 014, . W.,11 I,..,10 ,,,4 ', '.,.....„,lr I. \ .441/4fr. a; yyy ax aye • ," i. Y y4t"ny a .'' '�'r n,r t j q,Rya F"i«R� 4 ,wy��q",a.pa #« r,p i in:w ,. bilk i y, >\,.. >)i ,\>4t . wi . wux•wwronnly..r,n.s..ae»,r"... . .Y .•... .-+,a".ww�..+w. � «wt artxn74erx'mmt:af°+x�epvi„ytYw'w+,Ytarax..+w•wwaw+ • ay ..r«-...�« ....,:....i::. _.:,..,a...w..._.-;-.-...._ w._.....»...+r......,. .,...+,...........,._...:.:...r-...«.......:._......,.4..-:...:. ..,.«....ax,.-,.,...-....:. ,.....,.f Y:n.:,. -M .1:.::.... ... ,, ? Tigard Planning Commission ,!., Staff Report Agenda Item 4. 3 ,Aplicant City of Tigard R e uc1e t To consider an ordinance which would restrict high traffic generators within 750 feet of schools. Staff Findings 1. This proposal is the result of a presentation made to the City Council by several City residents who stated a need for such legislation. The City Council intended to hear this item as part of the revision to the C-3 zone but was informed by the City' s legal counsel, Fred Anderson, that this matter must first be heard by the Planning Commission and a recommendation made to the City Council as required in the Oregon Revised Statutes of any land use related r . r matters. 2. The attached "eXhibit A" is a copy of the • ordinance section considered By the Council and • this consititues the material to be considered by the Planning Commission. In regard to • "exhibit A", the staffmakes the following • • observations: A. City legal counsel stated at the April 28, 1975 • City Council meeting Where thin matter was consideredthat, as written, there is an ambi9iy as to whether it applies to both public and private schools and that no criteria Y have been provided for the use of 750 feet Which he therefore finds as being arba.trary In res "o:nee to the cns of legal counsel, 5p this ordinance shouldhappl to both public . apply and p r ., schools. In: answering the d rivat© , criticism that the 70 feet is arbitrary it becomes More difficult to provide rigid criteria. The citizen proponents state the reason for using 750 feet is to be that the Tigard Municipal Code allows city blooke to be no longer than 1,200 feet (1/. 2.020) acid .r 750" feet represents eomowhat more thans Tigard City block. . ,.,....-w. ,w , aw.a.,•<.w,..•a,r.» M..,r + ....,.... ..... ,r.«...«a»..,.a+,.,,. .ns rn.n rat a-nm:t,w.i.v,i,.rµ�•o-...,,.N wt...,»„ry'^k• , yk A pi J ,iw.40. Aid M,." + ,a j N, ,f , It is the judgement of staff that appropriate criteria should relate to the pedestrian traffic patterns associated with Schools. , For instance, the distance that students are required to walk along a major street before oh gaining access into the residentialareaarea served by the school could be a consideration. In the case of schools locatedon Pacific Highway this distance is relatively short while schools such as Phil Lewis on 72nd Avenue or the High School on Durham Road this could represent a much greater distance than 750 feet. p Another criterion for consideration is the attractive effect that certain uses have pIt is known for instance, that r: upon students. • the C rcl© K Market on Walnut draws students from the Charles F. Tigard elementary school, ; a street distance of more than 1, 000 feet. pp Themef are, the 750 feet maybe appropriate riate in some cases and not in others. As width most attempts to set down a p precise number in an ordinance, choosing the correct number or at least the number that Will in most instances fulfill the need is no simple task.' �,r C Because this ordinance represents an effort to regulate highh traffic generating businesses it is necessary to define Ahis type of Use Notice that section b of "� xhibit A►" attempts . just to do that. The vehicular volumes Used are from comments made to the Staff f by Carl BUttke. He suggested that a high traffic generator definition could begin with uses generating 100 vehicle trip ends per hour up to. 250 UTC h. At .the. low end. a representative use is a grocery store and on the upper end a very successful drive-in business of some type . : t is an example. , Us1.1a11 �y a rost;aurah Notice that 150 UTE/h has been used. The . figure chosen between 100. and 250 UTE h re re-= � p cents an attempt to screen out the' higher traffic generators, . brut no claim is given as to the validity or this choice, r Th p Ordinance also lists 5 land use cafe oriel r in an effort The proposed g fort to define high traffic . g � generating Uses. y �fi thin regard, the City of Cambridge, Y p .,,the following definitionsandcriteria foreied high traffic . g g y costa a:n restaurants. which the commission . r,. f may find of Use in considering this issue+ City Tigard Agenda item 4.3 t of Ta. page 2 N , ,,i,,, +pn.+wa..,r.T».me.w.err, .mp.a,n,+r'wa,:u.-.. .r.r,.,•..ui..«.V 90.,..:,.,, w•r ..,.wa+nhm.+d+ M''d'rsuwa-JwndVuC2aY•„anrdua .i�W<••r++xrne:xy.x' • _ �, • "Automobile oriented food service establishment., A food service establishment which provides a greater number of parking spaces than is required by the Zoning Ordinsnoe Fast order food., Food which is (a) primarily intended for 1M- mediate mediate consumption rather than for use as an ingredient in or component of meals; • (b) available upon a short waiting time; and (c) packaged or presented in such a manner that it can be readily eaten outside the P remises where it is sold. Fast order food estahlishmento. • • An establishment Whose primary business is the sale of fast order food for consumption on or off the premises. Article Ij Section 5 In considering Special Permits for Fast Order • Establishments and Automobileioriented Food Service stablishments, the Board Of Zoning Appeals shall give consideration, in addition to the above requirements, to the following; (a) Impact on traffic and parking. (b) The existence of other similar uses in • the same ,service area. (c) Sensitivity to the visual and physical characteristics of the particular location. d l + g ( ) fulfillment of a need in the neighborhood or in the city, (e) Reliance on wally"intrade as opposed to drive-in or automobile related trade. O. The staff wishes to point out that the proposed • ordinance offers a review capability but does not prohibit any uses out right. Staff Recommenatibn; • _ r To be presented f oliouiing public testimony city of Tigard Agenda TtaM 4," gaga w •. .-;. s+..+�rti. mnYIyAVNPXYW AN xmA+tr�FY:W4uC3n...1.Ms`.mnr fur ,..•• •• •••• ••.._ ••.• ,•, �.. EXHIBIT "A" • r^' a section be added to Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 18.12, General Section 4: That provisions numbered 18.12.130 and entitled "Land Use Restrictions. Within 750 Feet of an Elementary or Junior High School" and to read as follows. 8Restrictions_Within 750 Feet of an Elementary or Junior High 1. .12.130` Land Use Ides School directions from an elementary Foraccording o �' (a) a distance of 750 feet measured in all or junior high school, high traffic generating uses shall be reviewedg , � est in order that the the procedures established in Chapter 18.72, Conditional Us Planning Commission may determine whether or not a threat to the safety of students attending the subject school may result. • M J the provisions of this section ate .. - �bj , High traffic general-ors subject to for all. dr�.vev�a s, in excess of • use Which has a totaly defined as any trip land . hour when schoolchildrenare p�:esent Uses generally 150 vehicle ends per.. any found within this category are: 1. drive-in facilities for banks and restaurants 2. shopping centers 3. apartment . of 300 or more units fhaving more than 50,000square feet of gross leasable floor area 5, major medical facilities 6. industrial land use generating truck traffic s `.. : locate within 750 feet of an elementary or (c� An� land use choosing to ntor high school shall makepp • er 18.72, Conditional Ju � �g � application according to Chapter a use maybe defined as a high traffic. Use, when the planning Director finds that generator pursuant to the standards established in .(b) of this section. Ine the course of considering an application, the Planning Commission may require the ' Y applicant M o submit infotmation concerning the traffic rafficgeneration potential of a ptyposed use, methods providing access and Cgt4ssaxd other Pertinent information which the Planning Commission may find necessary in order to properly evaluato the pending applica tion. ti • CE OF �.w. PU LIC'IHEARING ,. AFF �l�JIT OF PUBLICA 'ION � 'CITY OF TIGA ;, .• PLANNING COMMISSION x. 4. Notice is hereby given,that public STATE OF OREGON, ss. hearings Will be held by the:Planning Commission of the City of Tigard in the COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, Twality,Junior High School Lecttife ' R®m, 14650 SW 97th"Avenue,;Tigard,. Oregon. Said Bearings will occur +gin. 1,.:. , ' ; :..::. _ ,...:._....:,:--_..._:..... May 20, 1975,at 7:30 p.m,and„will con- cern the follow • ",a Am,� r ,r� request b Ra Randall following, being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the publisher _ ...._..:. �.: q y n Consfiruct#tin • m to allow ultiple conditional.4 of The Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined 4 ues in�an`Industrial park (M-4),i,one = on a 5,56 acre parcel aid 6900 SW Burn- by ORS 193,010' and 193,020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and antn St,, known as "Security Stor”"age", (taxa 2S1•"2AD , vioslyatabled Y`.tax lots 2200 and 2300,i p ) "(pre ),�; , state; that the legal notice, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was E~ A request by Layvrence Whitakea to of said' newspaper for �J w „......:. successive and "use n a 3'allow ar zone a p as'a'condititrnal ` published in the entire issue "P t 13565 SW"I7acttic Hwy. tax l0. 600 Wash Co to c ' ♦ ..,. ... ..♦ ,. LSl`.I.VC,�•`�I�yV�1fL�4�:,�''�d� a� consecutive weeks in the following ;• Pro used amendments to the,Ldntng 5 i � � Ordinance ofthe Ctty of'T',igard,Greats :.......::.::..J.::...,::J.._..: �._.... =..- tin � + . .... �...�� MaY�...._.:.: ._...97_..»_.._..�.. trig a new,none dtfl'erentta g between, General Commercial (C-3) properties located on'Pacific Highway and those. (Si ature) Iodated in tile Main Street area;ice, a pran' to the General' h ovrsiona Section(a:8.12)which would Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of :restrict certain high,traffic generating uses within 750 feet of schools °., muses corninission will be seekingas- may _r.+i•w.e:.:,Y�i„J..J:J: .: �-- . istan a from residents.on , ..., p w to ,pyt, ... 19.� ststance .businessmenproperty ert" f � _ � itti'teo`.tl?�e membership of the to -° ho ::.......:. ... ......:......:.. .: . �:...:. formed Neighborhood Planning Org Notary Public of Oregon a�. nizatlons #4 and 05 for.the Tigard'" All e Rolling loins area; • . -`....w.::.�. j Triangle• and 72ndY mi.�,sion ex fres . ..� / 1g , ' '` thee persons having an interest hi My cop p ars are invited to attend.and. be 2356 pttblash1\4 14 11' heard 7-Ro " 1976 .r a, 4:,..•.,...,,.., ,:• .u,• .•.... r _ ,1w.. , «,.crv.*M'.+.:ganM.V,.:i'.rmar..., a , , • 44. • • wvNw%, .„n•1,,,J„14 .•..n .,M•y.• .r.a k1 .u........+r.....7.y.v.+ .+ mew...,..„y... V""�I..Nmfilt GYYYM >rr„+r� ,:y ,..,.... ....,ria.». �..,...4.•...a.•k 4., ^,rahtG$7;'JrAr�'aT�IzWa,�w}/eu IwurwwtN•wwa•«wa:.wragy.,' t- t . gyp. . r�,. 1 May 8, 1975 MEMO TO City Council and Planning Commission J ' Tigard FROM: Anderson, Dittman & Anderson SUBJECT: ZONING ACTIONS •IN RELATION TO THE COMPREHENSIVE` PLAN._;,, ; ; . . • By memoranda of December 19 and December 26, 1974, photo- copies attached for ready reference, we, as legal counsel for the City, emphasized our legal outlook that zoning actions of a municipality must not only conform to the processes and procedures prescribed % by, or adopted pursuant to, the enabling statutes, but must, as • well, conform to the comprehensive plan, with particular refer- ence on that occasion to the action taken' on the Setniker appli cation for conditional use in a C--3 one, which use was then, and is now, inconsistent with the NPO #1 amendment to the Tigard Community Plan (Comprehensive Plan) More recently, certain legislative actions have been taken by the Council to alleviate the obvious inconSiS•1:ency between the Commercial=-Professional requirements of NPO 01 and the continuation of the pre-eXisting C-3 zoning with respect to lands abutting the Southeasterly Pacific Highway right of way. In our memoranda of becember 19 and December 26, 1974, a then decision of the Oregon Court of Appeals in BakeiV. City of Mlwatkie, Volume ume 92,. Advance Sheets No. 15, Page 1676, was cited Y as a basis for the outlook there expressed that the zoning classi- fication and uses of properties should be brought into conformance within a reasonable time with the comprehensive plan. On April 2, 1975, the Supreme Court of Oregon issued its ruling on the Baker; case on review from the Court of Appeals, and We perceive it to be our duty, aS legal counsel for the City, to invite the attention of the Council and Planning Commission to the following pronouncements of the Supreme Court: "We conclude that a comprehensive plan is the Controlling land use planning instrument for a city Upon paisate of comprehensive plan a city assumes a responsibility to effedtuate that plan and confor�nt prior conflicting zoning . ordinances toit We further hold that the E, zoning' decisions of a city must be in accord with that plan and a coning ordinance Which i' allows amore intensive use than that prey scribed in the plan Must fail," ,) • x. �a tion.�•Y�.rrcrte�uxcmK�uu+rvecik;:fdai�r��,.vna...� .. -, . �......M ...... ,...�smeK<«.,vs.Yut.wieiiadiairc�rYm'aiila'axeaw+rMa�+vsz:_�n�" { • Page 2 Memo to City Council and Planning Commission May 8, 1975 • It is further interesting to note that in the Baker case the City of Milwaukie, on October 17, 1968, adopted a zoning • -i residential designating the lands in question as a a.es dential • apartment-business office zone, allowing 39 units per acre. On January 12, 1970, the City Council adopted a comprehensive plan designating the subject lands and others as high density resi- dential with 17 units, per acre. On February 27, 1973, without a public hearing and against staff recommendation, the Planning' ComniSsion granted a variance authorizing an apartment complex involving 26 units per acre, being less than the 39 units allowed by the 'zoning ordinance but more than the 17 units allowed by the comprehensive plan. A foot ;note to the Baker case is quoted. "In deciding . ,. that the ordinance must be in conformance with the comprehensive plan we do not indicate What Should or should not be `indluded in such ordinance or the predise Lime that the ordinance should be enacted." In another foot note to this case, ORS 197.175(2) was in- .\ cluded among the legislative directives), *hat foot note being quoted as follows • 8. Prior to " 1973 there Was some disagreement as to ,. . whether municipalities Were required •Lo adopt a compre- hensive plan. Or LaWs 1969, ch 324 (ORS 215.505 et seq.) at least express a state policy in favor of comprehensive p planning at all levels of government. Any ambiguity' in this area has been cleared up through the passage of 'or Laws 1973; ch 80 (OAS eh 191) ORS 197.175(2) provides 275:, u(2)215ursuantlto5OR5 197.005 to 197.430, 215.055, 5 r 5 and 453:345, each city and county in this state shall: ' (a) Prepare and adopt compxelerisive plans con- sistent With Statewide planning goals and guidelines approved by the commission; and Yt ' (b) Rnact zoning, subdivision and other ordinances or regulations to implement their comprehensive plans. ' Consistent with the foregoing, it is clear that zoning actions concerning land use; includingbut hot limited to, r� s sno ads, conditional use permits, variances and the actual ands, if the laWis to be followed, Must conform with the comprehensive plan, and we reiterate the recommendation of • our memorandum of becember 19, 1974', that zoning ordinances of the City of Tigard be brought into conformance with the compre- I hensive plan, and that action be taken from time to time to Page 3 Memo to City Council and Planning Commission May 8, 1975 • review and amend land use ordinances within a reasonable time after changes in the comprehensive plan became effective. v ed A. Anderson FAA:pml Incl. • a,. • • • • ( j as 1 • .;.e,,:a u. -: 8..,.w•:-r..,.-.4I.....-:- A .�...s-W i.✓2 i W.,a.a a ,.. ,. t.....� n,a� : ,.....,,...F:..,.._.-,...5..:.4'.:�.4 r ill 4, 3//. ., F F AFFIDAVIT A PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON ��7 5' MAY 1`z ,` COT�NTY OF WASHINGTON, ss, { of IIGI\R� ; I lsl"Q h Sehaf or CIi w...,_....__iu_..i.Y.i_..._.....r -Lc: 1 ... Y t'1.v';r..+. !"4'ra•w+Y aimw•r„n s p.' being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the, publisher ..:-..-.:—..Y::._.,,w- �a F { ;CITY O1 I C'A'RE , I F ilio oit G.otirtcl.:;: „ »a:_u.i..., ..Y..:wlY of The Tigard Tames; a newspaper of general circulation, as defined , b� �, " , Ofo'kl.lifigr X11 elc+ 1, 1 , f publishedat, ttia 'o ,i .Jufor tl gii, th+501'i,ec r.' E by ORS 1934010 and 193,020 at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and 'to-, tdo �'wri, ;; �ali't t,``rig `�d�;t; $ 5 state; that the legal notice aprinted copyof Which is heretoannexed �`� b ,°� P110-'' ,, t` ' ' g , ed, was v�it� x`dsP,ct" �u1, gi ,ii `t,aha 13 t.,,o— rui,Co rimerci published in the entire issue of:said newspaper for\''..l..w-2:J:.Y:Yi::i.x.. successive and �, ""�` ` �i,'�dnb �►?�d, `Cha terwl8 3214 Nei :Y or bpd tl0p er', ;I • consecutive weeks in the following; issues x:.,ii:".YIA ,,,,::�.Y.:: ::�_... i..:Wi:._-Yy,..Y....4 ,.101,. A'O '0, tc5t ' i fii .b, a G ',of , 1 hey"itSil,,e4f:,t rd �,x 'tol per" ,� Pidy J. & S .,.J.9 7 5 rnctte Use$,"condi o, 1 F s�,` iot rc. 4 4 .u.,.x.._i,.ili.._.ww -9 7:_..:_i.�,_. ......._ l..l..�..i...i..ixiiY:.i i.....�.. eoi r@ip,ehts'I,und,landae "p"iti ",, NIS N ' Y a! i l .rx el Aii�,ihtorditei.ri'pd its mtl np eat' rIh � � j ( '' A': -4-- :�_ _.lY_ .:........ •tali d k�i hdaftt ln-iei1dr'FO or rlgittriAt thea ' �� l,w :,a„aI� ,� �S at .B �1 ��1`Vpt�s�ll !�( a (y3i '�/ ({� �(*tt:°, I L 1 Y MW'4, bs"cribedia& swQrn to before me this ,S.th:. da of '' 0i1.D ,, iil.:: ..1�::.i........�Y y i ii..Yyii: ;:, ` +�i' 1C � 5°C`D ''`3074+ 'fish'May 1,tg,Nf ��.yq��i/y �� li.4AU11,Ftmi ..'Wti<a,WiSY..:AI•+ui-w.mra•i�^^n•n•v r7 vll NF"F+fib 6'^' , �A NyAxM '•l4.-,rnr.'�'/�.. •I fi' i �i ? 'i'P;, '''''',.° l''.r r Notary Pubic of Oregon "� vvl Gqq Y My comniissior ekpir cs t /,'Y 19,.,7" ..iu.-i.t,•..r.x,..:•.,.41._rx:w!• i Su:.iY A I t I r r f 6 ...w. aaw�l. wm-,•x n+ +„ ,.,,,,•"'"••••,•"+, ..., .......... .�..:r ..,,,,•••a.«.. du N1nr.+samrrNn'iwhw yplh#' NNiwrad Yuxx+:,i.ah.L i .q .«< ror YK+lw. W+•..at '.4u-.tr k �^n.' Y „,4,1,•;, x<a �. ....., I,.,...,, ..,... ,,,,.i,.,, • l to , x,r t p{ �L� M' V>� ylt4 5 yr "N"R 104 y ) �F.T.- Y Ali / ! 1vt S. f try • k.^Sam le st' ,T ; 6aSptllCaipNGF q C`,4L, r4'rL.i' `Wrn� 1•w „ F League of r u Cities f»G7i:sa....J'MY�irw`�.n..iJM1..?.•.ws 'laf �.,.1' 'i�'aT it SALEM:Local Government Center EUGENE:339 H ndrloka Hall No. III 1201 Coert Street N,E, University of Oregon P,0,0oX 928,Salem 07908 P,0,Box 3177,EUgehe 97403 ' May 7 1975 land use goals and guidelines to reflect unique League Reestirr res State features and needs of each area of the state, a Section Shared Highway RevenuesCDC intends to qualify the state for • 306 funds under the Coastal Zone Management • As a result of reduced PUC weight-mile Act by adoption of coastal goals. This will pro- collections and the potential passage of SB vide coastal cities and. counties with financial 4 i i resources for comprehensive planning imple- from 97 returning the vehicle registration period planning and1 from two years to one, League has mentation a g ` ioi�i of coastal owls, the reduced its estimate of state-shared highway Concurrent with public hearings on coastal goals, LCDCstaff will meet with local officials • fund revenues to be distributeddistributeddtu�ing the g � 1975-76 fiscal. year, The estimate has been on the coast. Technical Advisory Committees 1 are now beingformed to review draft Dais for in21, capita nNt:ws LCDC e 1975 revisedfrom the �1z, the coast and LCDC 'ho acs to receive.. advice FebruaryLeaguef ] � • the Letter to $11.53 per capita, The reestintate from other interested individuals and groups. of the draft coastalgoals and guidelin s . brings to $21.10 the total, anticipated per' Copiesb • capita distribution of state-shared revenues have been distributed to cities, counties, and to cities in 197 70--dowir $.65 front the all public alio college libraries, $21,75 estimated earlier. League estimates of In addition to work being done on goals for state-shared revenues will updated itsthe coast, LCDC has utilized its advisory isory coi- • legislation progresses and as revenue trends mittees preparing grant criteria for the (Es- develop. tribution of the t$4,4 million for local governments contained in the LCDC biennial budget request now before the legislature. LCDC is expected • to review 1n Ma r t LCDC Begins Reviewrc pt Lotal oeffic Y ecoinnleritlatt(en sGoals for Coastal Zone .frtrin t g ��als Advisory CoyYiitaittec f tar tltstit - bution of planning assistance funds to local governments, The Land Conservation and Development The recommended criteria will require a local Commission held the first of what are antici- match of 10 percent, either cash or in-kind, pated to be several rounds of public meetings LOAC has recommended that a point system on draft goals and guidelines for land use in the be used to evaluate grant requests for local coastal zone, In addition to work being done governments, Points would be accorded for, 1) on coastal goals, LCDC is currently developing work already completed in accordance with ORS grant criteria for planning funds for local, gay- 197 and th , statewide LCDC goals; r ) growth erninents and criteria for granting extensions to and development pressures; I) economic base; local governments for completion of cornpre- 4) scale of program; 5) readiness to proceed; hensive plans, 6) willingness to pool limited resources; 7) LDDC has put work completed by the Oregon existence of unique or significant resources which Coastal Conservation and Developmeint. Coin- need protection; and 8) the need to coordinate mission into a goal-guideline format similar to local planning efforts with federal, state and that used for statewide goats for land use plan- regional agencies, These criteria tire still In draft !ling adopted by LC. e last December, The foom only and will be circulated to selected 11/4, development of coastal goals and guidelines is cities and counties for review and comment prior the first step toward "regionalizing"" statew de to submission to f.CDC, • -nYSINOrA'M+r''�M^"+wdxw,wab...�nN^k1�Ia GYVE/Rf: N9a HMeyar4..aw':.t.w�V�.w..r lir.r. •• ;�.• r.�.•.• •v ..•'.'.. •...•••� • - a ti�waa+�e « ,_,.,,,:+:,.,,�.., �...�.....a,,.... �....,,,..w,..r.r..w,y�.n.t�n,+�ldvrl»irn�,jaw�.. mw�as.�«ww-� . • New appointments to LOA (. include: .Mayor assisted in maintaining their own households and Mike Wyatt, Roseburg,; Ellen Lowe, council- avoiding institutionalization. For further infor- woman, Salem; Larry Michaels, county corn- enation on this program, contact Richard Hal- . ♦ Bailey, tSandy ., mrssroner, Douglas County; Charles coup- vorson, director, Senior Centel P♦0 Box ty commissioner, Tillamook County; and Isabel 413, Sandy, Oregon 97055. Y Sickles, county commissioner, Jackson County. ° They join: Judge Paul Jones, chairman, Morrow County; Jim Richards, councilman, Bay City; Thirty-five Cities Receive Mayor Ron iiiy alt Redmond; Pat McCarthy,, Notice of Federal GrantsGrants commissioner, Marion County; and Louis Olson, county commissioner, Jefferson County During the first quarter of 1975, cities in LCDC will ask its advisorycommittees to Oregon received notice of an award of $885,998 make recommendations on Cl iteria to be used in in federal categorical grant funds, according ciig granting extensions for the completion of corn- to statistics recently released by the state Inter- prehensive plans and zoning and subdivision governmental Relations Division,sio7, A total. of 42 ordinances, as well as criteria by whichteri� local different projects were funded in 35 cities, rang- . '� • plans and citizen involvement ing from support for airport planning to coin comprehensive programs will be evaluated`, LCDC hopes to re- structio , of wastewater treatment facilities. First ceive funds July 1 which will make it possible quarter reductions in funding were shown for ,to assign staff and resources to complete these several cities, during the first quarter, amounting criteria, and plans to make every effort in the to $87,071, interim to begin completion of this task, While funding for this quarter is not in exact proportion to the yearly funding picture, the IIID data, reveals SandyHomemaker Service veils that funds going directly to cities account for a small portion of the total Heb s Elderl . p �/ Persons federal grant dollars coming into Oregon, Ove`- all nearly , Through . , ts of a , M , y ,$200 million was granted for programs r + working olur e effortlne city sall group of hold , , , tithe • .. ' and projects in Otegaii wrath clic vast innajarity of Sandy has been over 5193 million, going to state agencies. It able to augment its senior citizens program with should be noted, however, that many of the ' homemaker services � + � ' home for a number of local senior dollars the state receives are "passed through" citim ns who are unable to adequately care for in grants to local governments and as payments themselves, Homemaker programs are desig'iietlto individuals, , For example, Law Enforcement to help the elderly or incanacitatecremain in laundry ss eAdministration risupport local , � their Yores, Volunteers working in homemaker' government programs a substantialportion sp persons with food prep- of the funds the Public Welfare Division receives' . paratorantironing, household clear ere passed on as payments to individuals,rngand personal hygiene, equal importance is the friendshi and companionship which these • programs afford elderly persons. Hillsboro Mayor Appointed , The Sandy program was developed on a small. budget, In June of 1974, Sandy was awarded Leaa Executive Committee otic of five League rniiii-grantsintended to help League pi'esic[etrt Taira I„ \Villiat rs, eouiwil- The 1.,.. , s, g ', ` r ,retro _' y rttrt,e� � � l l g 1 1 i seveta is on cities cleve,la� of inti lloVo litrniatn strati ,1 u crit, r ec,erntl t[ circ �i�ntrltrt� r`esour`ce programs, r� it 1 g e c ty proposed to use its menet of Mayor Miller Mr auris, Hillsboro, to �` i ! y s „ gexecutivef X735 seed money gt grant to expand services tint, League tie committee, Mayor Dols offered by the Sandy Senior Center to include fills a vacancy created when William H, `\`oruig, To , elderly, To .institute former mayor of l3ea°vertori andg program, a small group of volunteers, already dent, resigned` from the executive. coo tie eees o homemaker services to the �, tlie� Bio..;. galready appointment. : tee to ` programs at the center, was assembled accept as theheudinil administrator'committee active lin . The 1str ator of the and trained, litln�ni purchase expenses s for the pro. , ,♦'g - ental Relations ,Division, . , 4 i state .Ztitt,r l,Civer rirnl gram have l se of various house. burls is serving his second term as mayor supplies,holexpenses tnteers, anal of . illsbaro, Prior to his election as mayo', he ,µ, tl eelcost oi" atlnrain rstetiri fol. volunteers,+ + ,g and coordinating the served on the city council for three years, lie program As a result of this small iirvcstimmerrt, is a technical writer' in the manuals departmernt. • at least 15 Sandy senior clti2ens have been of 'J"ektr+oiix, 'Inc, in feaveritotrr r.,.. t.,14'..0....++`M0m�m.M wM y.-��«.-� nY. Mfi,�,..aMditaa�nneurcet�,m.,WlwNua�.a...�h+•rm� -- W. ,_.. ......, ...... I. , . , C ' , , t , ,..,.. State Supreme Court Issues accord with a well considered plan," ORS 227.240(1). Opinion on Baker v. Milwaukie In conclusion the court held L .\ , The Oregon Supreme Court has significantly In summary, we conclude that a compre- , modified the Court of Appeals opinion in Baker hensive plan is the controlling land use .. , v. City of 1VIilwaukie and remanded the case to planning instrument for a city, Upon pas- the trial court for determination upon the facts, sage of a comprehensive plan, a city as- The court held in effect that an individual may sum,es a responsibility to effectuate that sue in court by writ of mandamus to compel a plan and conform prior conflicting zoning city to conform its prior conflicting zoning ordi- ordinances to it, We further hold that the nance to its comprehensive plan, The importance zoning decision of the city must be in 1 .. , of the comprehensive plan and its content are accord with that plan. Any zoning ordi- , accentuated in this opinion and point to the need /ranee which, allows a more intensive use •. , for such plans.to be policy-oriented, than that prescribed in the plan must fail. . . i 4 The plaintiff owned land which, under the . In deciding that the ordinance must be in , zoning ordinance, was designated residential accordance with, the comprehensive plan, we apartment-business office, Subsequently, the city do not indicate what should or should not be of 1V1ilwaultie adopted a comprehensive plan included in such ordinance or the precise . (adopted by resolution) in which the land in time that the ordinance should be enacted. question was desiinated high-density residential, , . , Judge Leavy dissented from the majority allowing for considerably less density than pro- opinion primarily because,* in his view, the de- ' vided for by the zoning ordinance. The plaintiff . , cision was not warranted under the 1919 language , sued to restrain the issuance of building permits either literally. or by intent and would- not for developments in the area which would have be until Senate Bill 100 is fully operative, allowed density up to the level permitted by the zoning ordinance, and sought to have the council conform the zoning ordinance to the dens- Conferences kiPlannedaon a„ ( ity designated in the comprehensive plan, Although the court noted that there was no Resource Recovery, Effluents necessity tinder Oregon statutes for a cily to have a comprehensive plan prior to SB 100, it Two conferences, one on resource recovery, the other on treatment f wastewater effluents nevertheless noted that, in this particular instance, o ' ' will be held later this month, The U,S, Emily- , the city had indeed adopted such a plan, The r; courtfolio -1---R-sira-sar—to raltzg—insofar as it onmental Protection agency will hold a seminar depjator the plan as the basic instrument for On land treatment of wastewater. effluents cm ,. .., 6--unty or municipal land use planning and said:,-, May 28-20 at the Thunderbird Hotel in Port- land, Nationally known experts on lancl treat- . If that plan is to have any efficacytt8-,. iniiiecuut dewitlilisi:tat:st ii oeihpaotte design nsitnlliie irlirtogerttisttn.titly chtiocil,is il,willi(I ' the basic planning tool for the city of Mil- ' I 4 1 4 1 waukie) it must be given preference over ease histories of several rvojects rot' additional ,.,, ,. . . , , , (/' conflicting prior orni,110 ordinances, To 'nformation, contact John Osborn, lill'A Region . I hold otherwise would allow a city to oo 7:3 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 08101 ...YI through the 'motions and eaipense of formu- (phono; 20g/4424296), lating a comprehensive plan and then rele- urq 1 Options . n i unicipa 111 li n,esource, Recovery" . , Oatio4 that document to oblivion through will he the topic of a conference sponsored! by . i continued reliance on the older , olting the National, League of Cities and 1t,S, Confer- orinance d , , once of Mayors in San 114t1.11101SVO on May 20-30. \,, The court felt the function of the plan uncia Among Subjects to be discussed will he the tin fhkioasano rationale made it a higher atprorrity pact of state laws and regulations on local govera.• thali''''titO 2ohltig ordinance, irrejodlegi of the meats, financing of resource recovery programs, form in Which—'itr—w-a$--a-dopt61—resolution or and technical problems involved with such pro . for the tn4 Ordinance, FUrther, the majority of the cent grms a . Pee tor e conferenc,.e is$26.00, For more believed that allowing the tnaridtutus court action information, eontact: Solid Waste Project, NL(' was required under the 101.0 city zoning enabling and tISCM, 1020 lye Street, N,W„ Washington, act which requires that municipal moiling be "in, 0,C, 20000 (Phone 202/208-11'76), 8 , . ,,—....,.....,................,,,,_______,„„,,,,,,,.", ,,,,, Ick • Revenue Sharing Priorities in Oregon Reflect Those Nationwide ' recently ,. The Office of lRevenue ,.harirrgs receihtl released analysis of actual use reports from the fourth entitlement period (July 1, 1973—June 30, 1074) indicates Oregon cities' uses of revenue sharing funds reflects those of other cities in the United States. The table below compares uses of revenue sharing funds bycity:.� indicated ,_ � city planned uses by cities in governments throughout the countryin fiscal: car 1973-74 with ala. Oregon, as indicated in League studies of selected city budgets for fiscal years 973-74 and 1974-75, REVENUE SHARING USES BY CATEGORY OF EXPENDITURE FOR OREGON AND THE UNITED STATES Percent Expended Percent Expended Percent Expended is Cities Nationwide Oregon Budgets Oregon Budgets Category of Expenditure FY 73.74 FY 7344 FY 74.75 Public Safety. 4. ..Y: 46% 21% 34% Transportation ............:.............. 15% 20% 21% Environmental Protection...,,.....................:.:........ �.: 14% 14% 13% Parks and Recreation 8% S% General Operations 8% 28%* 12%* Social Services.....:.:..:....:cr....W .r.. 6% 4%a 8% Libraries:...:...................:........."::..,.... , :::.,.....W...,,.:.:.:..::., 2% 4% 4% *Because interdepartmental and miscellaneous activities were included in general operations in League studies, these figures may be somewhat inflated. While overall priorities for Oregon cities and cities nationwide are quite consistent, the most pro nounced variation is the slightly greater emphasis placed upon transportation and lessers emphasis placed upon public safety by Oregon cities, Data from thefca , , tlela.l Office of Revenue Sharing also shows that cities nationally spend more of their revenue sharing dollars on operations and maintenance do cities in Oregon.g l thatwere , , ;g The League analysis shows that approximately 36 percent of revenue sharing funds rdesignated for operations and maintenance by cities in Oregon in fiscal year 1073-74, while ORS data indicates a 58 percent expendi- ture j ` tur e for this category nationwide. The gap may be narrowing, however. The League's study of fiscal year 1074=75 budgets revealed that 48 percent of revenue sharing funds were designated for operations and maintenance, ��' �17 i es tat istrator of the state Intergovernmental Relations Governor Division, has been appointed new chairman of no Law Enforcement Council OLEC, All appointments to the council are subject to Senate confirmation, Governor Straub has announced a reorgani2a Ido changes are currentlyanticipated aced in the • tion of the Oregon Law Enforcement Council, ,g p The , .. , will planning or grant programs as a result of r esuit of the reorganization will be a shift LtiA in membership to 1) create a smaller voting the reorganization, body without losing full representation of law 3'. enforcement and criminal justice agencies, curd Gaiiag er Accepts Position 2) create a council which emphasizes r+epreseii With it of rants a ss tation of units of local government, professional y and community organizations, and broad publicLeague staff associate Edward F Gallagher interest, has accepted a position as assistant to the city g membership of the council will �manager in. Crants Pass, Ile will resign from be reducedThe voting �1A�11 , r ��111.. �nar�ai �, specialLeague on May 10, 175, assistants will be appointed pointed to assist the voting positiong to 17, and non-voting � advisory .his with then l�ca, .� , �.. : representation _ the Gallagher was hired by` the League in March, council, Loyal government re presentation on t e 1074 to coordinate� g 1 , wart, done under a grant council l be pp y y1 w ,l , r. .r r r m the state Economic Opportunity . ,• �o police clriefs approximately ninerrd1i people, received from monies , . including l , a t st t Office, Grant have been used to publish ,„ attorneys. in addition to former councilmen and Guide to !Taman Resource Pi`oorams and ''heir mayors, William Young, former nhayor of Beau ioun-dVIi&/ and to provide five cities with "mini. ver'toii, and League president and current admin grants" to develop human resource programs, 4 na�. � � :, , - ..,.,... �s+Mwnh'fl4t+iSw �,,.. -. ....,,. .. .. qn6»adv '»wY.wwQOdmh4wwnw.q..,.« w}.rr w,+.w.. 5�,{+irilmc�Jb9hfM/sL.am"�- .u�.+i..wr+..µ,:• 1 • • , League Wants lnf orrnation On tion about the new ordinance improvement • ff�c'r' F• 1 li3 C�1` 9 d � C tJ�"�' service or the codification program should be directed to the Bureau of Governmeiital Research xsThe League office has been advised that several ails Service; P.O, Box 3177, Eugene 97403 city officials have resigned from city office as a (1 elephone: 686-5232), '` direct result of requirements for filing of financial disclosure statements set' by the `conflict-of- Revenue Suring M,;y Be Used '• interest .law", House Bill 3304 (Chapter 72, Ore- gon Laws 1974), passed by the 1974. special ses- ®r Bicentennial Projects ., sion of the legislature. The League would appre- The Federal Office Cf1Ce cf Revenue Sharing has 1 use of revenue sharingfor elate receiving information from city officials of clarified thefunds any resignation, which occurred as a resultof these Bicentennial projects. The, chief counsel of ORS filing requirements: If the League, can determine has determined that the operating and rnainte- .7 category "recreation" " Section r ea ons for objections to filing disclosure state- malice cats. 'o1 , of iec,reation in Section 103 of mainte- reasons and problems which have resulted in such the revenue sharing act includes, but it not limited resignations, it will be possible to monitor the to; art music and (lance exhibitions• . � , harticipa- programs of the Oregon Government Ethics Corn- tion and spectator sports programs; arts and mission more effectively and suggest changes in. crafts and other culturaljactivities; museums and 1 administrative rules issued by the commission, zoos; and parks and playground activities: Also p yg' ... included in this category are parades, and other • celebrations provided by local governments for Ordinance ance Improvement Service public enjoyment, Other Bicentennial Projects Now Available to Oregon Cities l�)i o�ec,ts.uiay be undertaken with revenue sharing funds outside the "recrea= yJ €� y� include Stephen A Rhodes i.ecentl.� oined the Bureat fx r, s tion cafe r)i 1 hese brar' �ro��rairrsjla prcr,�- public works of Governmental Research and Service at the ects, beautification, and library 1 • g•r and ac- University Oregon aslegalHe quisitions : . . , , . � c tirsitic)ns and may be classified within a specific will help1�iiiitla,tairordinance finr assistant �, y __ - improvement So1v category such as "public transportation", envir- category � , s�i rr ice and aid with ordinance compilation and cock oninental protection", or "libraries", T -fieAerova ip � ry beingdoneunder the .tion Of historic buildings, development of historic it Urban ServiceProgram of the League and areas for public use and display,� and other capital . the Bureau, , fro ects mayalso be funded with revenue sharing ' Rhodes, a 1074 graduate of the University of l . ,„ , monies: It is entirely tip to a city to decide Oregon Law School, joined the codification staff whether or not it wislit's to use its'r'everrrie sharing March 1, Re will work under the direction of funds, under section 103, for any of these pup_ James M. Mattis, Bureau s, legal consultant, who has hadresponsibility for the codification work poses, `, for a number of years, xpaiaion of the staff will allowupon city Leaguet request, for periodic substantive review of ordin- ie i � Omnibus Crime Control Act antes previously compiled or in conjunction with revision projects, An increasing number of cities The League recently publisher) another in its '� a i,. with . � � R' ' , have been requesting such review to assure that series of icc:zaGe��C)r'ls on "The� 1ii7plelltelltcl local ordinances comply with laws enacted stip tion of the Omnibus Crime Control Act in Ore- sequent to a codification project and to incor-� gori", Tike Oregon Lav lin or'ceinent 'C)unt'il porate changes that mak, be desirable in view made federal assistance available to the League of recent court dec,sions or changes in local to prepare this manual for city officials, The ) policy and'practice, As with �thet work, thereport reviews provisions ois )fthe Omnibus Crime , service is available on a cost reimbursement basis, Control Act, as amended in 1078, Oregon stag Codifications and compilations arecurrently relating to the Law .l.�,nforecmmnt Council, 1ales being frolic felt i Creek, City, the structure of the council, and the law err- . aril ilii, Glatsl.ariit,, Island Merrill Myrtle Creek, Myrtle Point, 1Mtt, Angel, forcemerit grants and planning processr;s, Copies Newburg, , .. Code y, , the report 1 liilorliatli Redmond,tlmond Rockaway,aUn- ofhave been sent to city managers, ion, Waldpor t and Winston, revisions city recorders and police chiefs, Additional copies w.w. , 1l � are dot for Corvallis, Dundee, Forest may be obtaintrt by contacting the League office being A Grove, Harrisburg, and Sweet Rome, Informer in Salem, .waw+ rr rnm,yw q+rwi „...r..:wq,r+^�m„„_.r�.....�� w. yr w y..w+.r«..._,w..+.»r„we..+',ww--yNrr.Mrr�Y}AF2fl4510PMM^'gtl.'SMm191S1.Ml'+l9�LAtLL WTlt46iJ�t+f W..tJML"YPtl.wwfG...t ' .. ti .-, .,.,°, !a .« ""M; ..?i,.. t-',� I r... ..p•. S 'rr: .,, ,, '.(If'''' :h7•' -U ra.!1 q''« ' ial •Fa Fib: � 7� r7.2 q,,,J,r"rr 1, " titr .r,,aa.lh,`, ,. ,1 4 . ,,,' 1,4,:14',.. , F;e.• 'f!.,', , , ',ra i; "pA ta,v t 1f . ., , e't,:IY''4r.,y t . L.wSr � ,''i 4�f r;. !•.!...0'r4'. f.''..4.` i t.h,• },, '& ,. j ly,e',t�,l,.1. .-4 tcc,b,, �i 1�,c.,, , « I ,°g.Y k�,kA.w:. ,� ,a��>ti. dap #.,.�.,Vi.,,,"'l�r�'w u• k K7'y7.�F'v,�; :sr r,,1.J. 1» t a # '7K. {:' .r i �° ( )r ,ia.�� °!.'.»:.'41:1'`',':," �M1� r #.Sr YvI r.A+11` +SY`:f '�' ,, ,a a. .,tx c ,v r.^, "F ii5,+:. C,t -4 1 n A 6,+ `s 1: t'' ;t s: ?r• F y{,�. :'•.,)1 ,i} •..3°r Y, d. .r'y* V{ .t !a. p.-.iy .,e ♦ tt",•ie t rt"t v,� ,�, a ,:{ .. .4�. `!Jr` S !!". �• r„�. 5 +� r ... • � '.,',,V;� `.j' •.);14:,,,,,',,,c4,,,,....,,441';'," � yy,•,,. fir.. .i',i,,• J , , ,i e ,;r ,!1.,,. p -°-rt. '�",,... ,� wr+"" '1��+.`' ,-,�C ,�,. k �, d . ''4 " ;a i ,'iC, u � ra, t�� a�' r 1 r�. •T'r ',F ,k X 'Rr- i."M 4.�,4:� 'n Q ff�.,, ,.1 y°. l;'' �r,f,•,� yy��rrr,,�r �: _ f,{r' a ':t6Y';2 '' t .iy,�.. .r^ ,/ -i ! Iw� .. i=, M., •+- N.,'. tit`; r�4, <:' b 1, �. ;`L 1 Srq. r; uw�� 9 ��'{'6 i � Y }� ;+�'�: i! h•”'-,.; i '�,,x+t f 4 "µ h ,i :�y., _ ,,. ,:1+rr, A a, '>t�Mr,n,,,If r. ,: �h,f,,N,-'.,,' $, �y, ' i, "",F2 .,"+°y, it •,. ` ri,IVt:*,1 , }4 ` v . ;`,'.i','';'•''.'' ,'',‘.:.- ?.Jr � :; ,3,'- ,.o �..5y �y �irrr y'1 y y ;^�r ��1:y f...1., �'- w ,,,,:,r , w a � p , ''''.`;:z'::;:;': ', '''':'1''''':':,'''':::r" t Y . � �. �'i �' 1 �.",rF� �'^4 c ,,,.'.� v µ� +�' S x >e'' ! t ' r • rry„ a , '1: ii r ',. f... .xr ! ,:,+,,•.,r �''o; + Y r i•'"Yyr jE ,Fr I +1 '}',�, / r F,,, d,•.:p' !. `�' rr ,4}' !' ;2" , y'^y ,,+".,,1.-" Ir",., S t•P ':'a4 , ,,4.,'. � 'k i ( .. +t„. .�, vd' 'pr M `4C9.:r.,i,:, g rd`s�.e�r" , ' �1 „ .r � y�,y wl., fir+ ! 't't�,. a.. '71.1t,,,..„, "� i��g, y r A l °f \� .4X ' 1l •t `.; .'� �'+ r:ff"_, ,.I! y1 4�,* )! .,,1 P �'AC}hi'S,R,, t' 1'" `� /�-t.x p,�"Tpfl�i�Lltr?'y��.ly.t Y ,.h 1,•.�fa . {("b�1' ?,,'N':,4"4''.4.',/,'"j:',:', n.:P;' 4., ?r, �,, ''''‘,.07','!' �,-[: t ��1.ty �',.,4+' .1- ,r.41• ,�p �'�w}'. ° ��7:C 1 �k ,„, s Y41,,v d r„^r j ' 1 .f'e y � 1!lr:- , tl 7 H,° ,.! r sy,�>wf„ ^ t �i','-, • r.. ,„�' fir, ,y 1-''+.�"r f• +•, "3NF.,w•! r i a_rf: �.8.::' h ter:'• ,,!-',,..1 '''�r>.,4, ,•, .;,�,x".bq t�; ��'r�,.'vY,�,,, .9 7 '., ''i a 4 i. r.Y #r „,,,! .' A` -r. , ' ,y.Y iy ,•.,;. ILL ,.:lr,.. .... ' ,,��m- hX"�r+ y`'s .1� in yrr A •;:'7;a;X Y :^At t w . y':c �;� a M,}y1' y 11� ,w.�NS '4"-7,,,F'4.;',,, 1 .rr+t, : ?C?'. .s�y,lr ° ;•.:..:44,r4.4.)-:-.0,,,' a��,^ •.r'rt t r�_ ,,,I '” �' ,. ".,. � :+sk a y,r�:.1 wa `+��:� '.:n"14 L r, � ��, r ,'f.,�, r ta,?'' is e „,,,1,'rd,,v4 f'gy.!.,,`�( r:"k v, �'5 �.,r .. �yy�`r•nt i Y');,5 � :,.;. ,fin... ,";,, "CC :r;>' +,'r'r,. t ,.-:-, 1 r:,/' : ,;. ''''`I'.'4''.' n , +♦l, , - ,.,,r,• r r 1 ,,,• 17X4 ^.b.S 4"rf ,}., 'J' M1M •ylt:�, .-A':.v*t^ '11# ,{ e', : ^, 1'- f' .y��$ 4r '"'t, 'r!.^n'pa KVo t ' .•,4,!! * .°3. dr u• '.w :y. w r „A'^ 1•.n�k, ,�r'.� , :r ° 't'iy -,,, '',1'1.,''''''r,:. ,4.' tt "" w.'•�.,.• r,r,'�:! it f d,a t, '-1 ,8. '�.A r'�'',.c.'�! ��% r t, hF'�.tal r� .nt Mtr;';G''.' n, •t' ''''''''''.1;': ,x, 1}r. - +h, .:;4;,.Fr •,ft• 'jk" . .,V4 1 t?1,:: SFr',,..4 1 t _..'.,•T b'.1•+: ;�r 1;;'.Fr+ it ,y�>r" ,r', 7 r. i ,' YY 1 r.w' '.:� ; kF k1, ik.. `;•:Ir fr.., , -4i F �. -j. W^ 4 ',. -•' .�,". ^ ,w M,'�yw. ... :t , ...hr.��."ll'' r :,4`? ,c ,,,�k�`�:f,.',i�'xi k�.'..f.:y '�Y,,.,,= t `�'i- +d�ey ,..� �.x s ., {, ° �°.., M ?'��,r+Mr^g"p " .+; Sry r,M1,. � f� �,.:wrF �».r �u 4. � Si,t: h4 r,' + u. e,:. .,` R,. 1,+''I v,T 17,'-.4 (9,.}'.,j ,r.'•"•::'•:r•'1'!;';''''4''''''• r rr ,k l ,4'F.., ;, t r !,i.:'; `� _„,, r7. X t + +d:,t 1 +r, , it I t Y � rt•p't�i 1 7 " �, >! 1: '� I,� M '• %�Z r iM' ,A p `;4�s��'!. � }�Y al Y � w l,N ii •C�v'^�Y 1 ':�4 r`1,f�r pig�7�4 � Pi'' i',t ,. d, e , .1 ....•':` Ah` c. A' Sewer' 4 @ p� t (j y t01 -* 1 Sr 1 e .- , A`r ii(i ° _1 ':r, �tii'p i "T - ,66 ,.h r,. y k,y`M ri/t 11r �t + ♦• vw�' ti Inv. Ir 3 `'f. 3�W ,t d Ya tpA.t+ A •'torsk�n�{p etv�t V 1 ''n . ;q ,l 4 y' •� terg .A, .;i;, .41 1 i:0,1 • '1 o nci'riteYif>,M•1,? :ertc•,,,:erg ,i;Ma .-; :,':.„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,4,4;.,., r•fi,,, 1.1.,eft 43,,a. +• ."0 q rre �'`°„'.. 1 orf ., •,''''l,, 1 :, •}r ....+Aga. .o' ,! d" �y r '',^A 6u.yN:� ',°6" 9' '�.. t>7 •!} '..dr ,'� s,• ;+:` �". r r -�'t,. F r :et'r W f, :3-;m r�2 4, pti�a, rr,a,.,,, ,'' ery� • 1 • yi v(} i pyo' "1 b -a pyre 0..• 1I,' a . f 1 x !,,O z p. , f Q 1 It .- • ;41..)C.:,..,',: V P Q,t. 4�.A-`4{.. J,;,+.a.f ,. b' •f^.T1»1..'ry; 4,#, ,r I ,, .ti.a,>±..: l r s. �f:i rte° ° •1�''°',�t ,ir�� ,," 'y, .i:.� Cr^` g .taw aft,� ,,',,I,-Sd ,4i..�, o- � "k'' ,{ � 'f,F1:��'L ,6,',1 1 W.p �51,1,y { " x rye i �•i ,y7, e i p b l ,. f��✓., 1� n;d pr... � -�'�'>t �°�� r+ ,'l,/ 1 ,.M�., 4ry r"" 1 �'7 iit, � {+}�i�L�"+�4•h�4y��q y,�" +4Alyt�Q rA.. {,{��,�y'N. ,^.y{.{,,�{�+`Ji�'.gt��?r.��ay ,! ,1. 11;r<£•.ri, r."'4 ip'..--.,,..:,,,y,...,$rX 1. :1,'y..);•. r", 1 '� 10,611. t m Yli I fx " ,`,' ,1 T t F;on• i o{P,d4.r I.". + r'�r, :y��.,. 1t'�'1,,,:,,i"....7.y-:. �°�•�...,�+t.Q 1^+�'-0 1 R,.'�{.�'�,�lq1 0-,W,,�'.4��} ., r ,r�.. .t�41.1,0.,4„:,i't..L,' "2'4r R'1'P'^K;�'i ''',4•Z'' ',,r41+6. t,i ,', .,',1;;.,-4:,'%'.,...,;-.'r? 1:','t, 1 M1.r;.• 4tt .X , 'iS' .4.1'.e. r f,',;*�i , 4,er ':t t IrY', ° .,+�•,w r ,�"T', #, v+!_; ti � �W.�`, �'Pt �r° ;, 4,�,3.r '1 •r,r.rA`��,, IS � Uv ra�: , ,,�, �t �' '`, d5, .1 ^+,f�� y W �a`cr •, ,�, h. },q r..!e R-0 .,, 1 ,, V I'i M .a•T+2' ^,J„d ,.f . .I„it i r,0, ,• �r, �t A. -1'�>�i ',.r'e i � , tSl ,.y.r e. '.k •”V Ite'iit, }, r a,.$a .t yy ,- r µ ,tt�t' •rqli:K.y �3'��' a(iy^!; 'id ii r'.�Ci v r y.d��s' ;1''!"�a�' i" 9 uy'' /t, .yr:' 1, .+4Y, i .” i �• � 1 ^..S':�. ,� :,✓ r*fe "nt r �rpg5 5 ,* • '}+i. 9r. 5 tt;;yyr"'.r 4. V' r f• �':.° �'.Lr1 —J.F3, h,.4•r .g:, ,J• �.!,..,r.' ;,, n v d ,.� try r r ,{i?•n1' t f'C. g'2, . .w ./". ,.,,Q 1 ,,44,90131',3,.$4F•54,4. •0. Y4,: , 4ai.r,}"�0. , 4 ny N, l " $. 1. S7r k " , , ,i,.,',°,413,,,,..„),1,'3,/,-.3„•,,,;•,..'4.,.t,.;17.0,, ,,.;..t ,am` (� G, pn r �'7 y, J,'#7�, 1 M. ,r�.. .,y, ..10. t,,-'•,4t'., lY �,Ylr,1 r'+ -,,v /1"' �'' ny�,,,,,,,,,,,,M...,'"'�'111 M o l� J},w�, ,,,,1r`Y 87,�]o-92 irte Ig`,y >,1 ` ,y-+� '1 0 ! 1 .i "r 4 , !�* 5�" .tA '47 r ht),t „31„4 !Y,11 fi471r Y•G.i! x,. ,. .,},•, ;.):1•11,"�r.dy I.a y �r m vt +�1 �7Fra ` t +,county, { 4 ,- 1 0,,,,„.„,,,,4.,,,,,,,,1r „°,(,,y 1 d .#t ty /,y- il' ,1 Pd ,�c.. i v..»fir'�itn i" 1,'`..,,•••••.,,,'.•3,;'1, ..,. �y}}yy t�y� �f l�,r}C�j (, y 1l ty '' ,,,,rra,,i4,11ili;! _rt.• - er 1`,r,.. :•t.' :, ('1_ �i[],,i;,�t ., - t,.47 i}ve11., ry jp,1f .i •i 1i11tX"1' 7.}055 usp .Y".,X,'+ ,C• �.,_: ,� ' 34 ��.�r�t�4 .�,+,�:- .3-4.',4r4j�t , At.2' ]''"'�U"'S0, 5. .14.,,tu.;,.,,, , .tw 3I.yy'.'L FX' .�sw,t f '7X511''rn' ' .'c't�� ;,,:* ,'_ c a t . 6 y - i S h o,,;?900 rS +�I,,; ,-'-ir':.%.`:.1-:'.µ"'rtt-„;o'•l9''17g,J S •1” i4+...'A ,„A iVX U -'. 6(�. d''y ?Y:•...W0.401„gi,RA,,w,,,,,,„., CS`,-1•. a i ,.,: s !, .••,t^,�'' .4,t �T' +` °x"�°�' t ,1' ! •:6. � tr1 °�' »i/' ,U /d1n iA i1 1D7�. Vl ,t tMr +J y. p,�t r r 'i t�,�le R U ,�;� rIprt gIr`..�g't,::,,,, or• t 4�' • :A '. r :: ` ,.'t r},.5..,.I r•) •Ha li �'lf kation..p° •• 3 tw. 1 � ktw A _� '�'•"�`,�' t-,t 1 1� � �.��1 1e(;,��l�r �� S ��q�ak��.w�' • � ��yi r� �k+J� r y°•,h„.,,,,,,,;;0'',,,� ' ftW pp f y' day, 1 f .,,,M. %., A'” •�1^; 7 appy, •y,, iiit}�, „, " 'y�Ty+ .,01'�'•Y �,a ''' 47;141.,,,;,,:f.,`,'r'ii'..".... .1'1.1.4111? ,; t 1ti l+ d °y i(Y rr '� ip d,� y'. � 1 $ '!, ,,. i¢,., �d C•r�ri • �*dJ.:e:.th j Cr�3r ehic1el,•; tk'° •'I „Ota y I 41'''''''';''''' ':'' i,tyy y .d.?' d. "': ' b . a '�+,° 4 A MD ,x."• �n v ,,,+°7°'.0' :;�.#!-y. ': y.,,.,' 4,.. +,F1t5 y.y' ,.•4.:. tly{j.Y]!a A, 1 '� :` 1!'.:: 'i, -', '• i 4 1 �jy1 I Vin+i',j T; 4!+FU �R4 �1Fr'6151rig f•,Fh r ;2,1 I' i .IrF'. 1 4'' C : '� !r, �. +, ', ,._X i ^� .1 c`. 1.i s ,.a."''i I r In x at` `'as$ig n ,"0, ' A ke"e .. 4i.,:' '. 'p h a,.rye,„.J°rt ,�ati r i:',rrr 4.�ij' '' !� 1 � ��^1d,� . �#� ✓, � !. ,`�. ,fN;.l.�.p-:�rk,}�,r, ..nvr��lr4 ;r' }71� F L is r. t .} t•� y� 'q�.rA: p�,day;ys R.r:'te i 2`rP"L'e ii' T 1 .,j l , _ s, 1•� t1_ 'I, ,, G'f' U t:;',,?0,•' F'tRcc s.tV/,4f4iF,';,'City :'Admi l,Cstr ator ;{�11:j4p1.�rLtf� ° , n y r. !` M r9¢ra a :a, ,,h�,4,� r,:_{ '1� � + ;j ¢ t Y l�" r r W+ r,,s r !�� 3 'r.• �y I` a'^': :+.°•. 1?'t,r ° y,.:'�:c .yc^. -*a t d ^ '.1:'”{ 'r r4 p. .Y,y �,, �',,•,i'd°;:•#ria.{ i71} .'� �`.'t. `t�.' ,j� 't.rttl,t't y +�' -..� P�}'1:., �Y n � v :,� ! , . nr b , •k' 'Mi'k�,'a ha rtr . K r 4 dy, • `,'' 8 r i avT k r /n •_v+ 1„,,,L.,,,,,100,,,,,„,..,,, ,1 ,03,1 Y, �t n ssl i v” i0�00 rDe Bice,':in 7,k,y �'."1'k „"±1. 1Iii,,,,..,, ,,,, i «t y 9iw 7,. r, i•.1 .ltiy`y(.y.�1. -4.t y�.1*y 1''� F A., +ir�I., ptlilt 11 ry,,•,.,. .., ',rr..,,,,g,9"!..* •.}l.:,,, y�Ty,� 7yp. 5.t ,{ ,,. y,s'• rl : I'!' 4.tbl t� 1` '' '1+'f`f i',-+ 'lii1• L'adm ii. WiVit,i.#'t'.► k°, 1� '4 ..' ilt .,� i1\'leli+.` .,t?',a A-111p .. 1�y '''• rl7,• ':i jr,.. ij,+y�(� v414;.y, ,M ,. 11.e., y J10. 'i'.ip�;Yyrr,; •p,..'«'�d' ��7"xA lit 't °,wo �si1^closely wit "1f r1 9t .' , ;a r, ird: 4)4 A 11' +.y� i A 1, -i Y u�5�,rn,,.�y�yr,,7rr�} ,.,1r ,1 �{.�rirtc.p j L Y,y r:�y 4 ;,' .y"L ala, �1�'iw,wi.-nj rri.r;' R'�' ,� S'. -0:. ',i,e�•,V r F:' , ,t.,d+jqi i' n cr ',„..,.,114,21,..114,,:''.4?' 4o1t H.N,i!T„ CLU' Add+Iint4'y '4 a 444111 ,a . ,j ,;,,lei.‘-.; �y,( Qq� ��1.J( y�,yrJ�, - Y�i•,iw.._ 4 i', ,_'''_.N �G R:,.. W•�j. l y �.rid,.. '!tt ,� -M.yl .dS,�y :Y;�R�+.i. rC,"'" ! _ 1 wx ''''',.4';'4' '. ' ,,, ,...;,....,..,..„.„,,,I;:..„,.„,,.„..,,.,,,..„,„.„„ . , ,z.! y�yt1 a, ,, 1'' % Sk.. t { 4r «' 1 -5 $ ' f'.i'. i .d'S' +6,`i t '?4'1.44' :,, ,lY: i '•'' r, a �r . Y;w .w4 i'.'' i, :,iy c ,. r , ' 1, ,,AP � ., !.„A1 0 '. } t'' 4-is'r., y,T l y t 1� .{''. {,,,`,441,4'' -•� w tw;!r ,a: •rr' 'F',,,r ,, a ,. ',x k ' i. c'1” e. F1 ;tor I.,r' Old t eG° ,ide,;4 ol,..P.. d flit P ,, 41 � ,. ' x _ ,,CiA.:, " fc_ay`;ro 4,, o"aS >I, �. �ouieL. „.•11,,,,„.,.,,,,;..„,4,...7.,,,,,,,,.,,•;.-,!;..,„.,:„ 1 �,� y •,.3.,',,,,,.•,.;.:.•!.g , it . L � 1 7• '�i' 1 i��, ��k�(r. ,. t�q i�,� 1� 4ir1� �r , P i 'i' r4 :'3_ •r v'• M ° ,T ,.,,,'A 4f y /4,14:51,.1 "'..,, h• Z . ' �,f1,.v ,l a1' ; r•4' ,'�t I ' .,i: •a 'r � �'t g *t' �! '��FCS;T, .%:,r4. 1,r� 0 ��t �`r��;�J,� �'1�+'� � ,�lY4y t,,�•:k,.,1p,r��rpt y:��',” r!, ..;, * r,'�'.T' '..''''''',%* �:h� i' < r 42ri.: Ktd.,�`� , ,, ' , ,r1 ,M,h ''rf',4P"'t�,`;�Nrd hi^1 k.! ,.;4,w';'-'!.',i'144‘;,;''''':';, ",(`.:r b .l, 11 i !4�r,X 4 '',. h `°i '2''' '4;,w"' ! , C..,x j., , t 'vim. f m ' 15, 2 9 9 j 4`. t":". ,?,''''',i/i1"0;,. '� ,r ' .•• r E r• , d+ a. 4C,:.�,i, FFA+,v,)r°..'„ra, � .v..h"gt.'I �'„f±::/'':' WTA ."u:w ,,a�s+.,rS»twswa„u+r''`.U:L,.>!.w:°r..4nn„w.r«'6;aiuia,..w.(..ar>,mn.,.;9:.i.,',w::r,.v....«ia'.,,.irrrv..r+,r..,..�l,+,wr.,..e.+s:;M1c.«,.,+.✓ -Www✓rr..«.;,r«:,+•,...,.;«''. ,`'s LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES gat U.5.. Rot P,o, sox 928 a PA 9dIem, Oregon 973(19 I D Salem, Oregon Permit Not 50 Address Corruetlon RegCiested a`, 1.11e i 1t/tl totdel Lt ,i• FP1L1iin; 1yy'X ti o V..q o 'i w O', x ), ) T1g,ai d 'OeetOti 972 rt 2 . . te dob , , . 6,0 rei New' 'aryxwY xW.r•.^..ww.wr,a4,^Mn,..1M+h F.IY:ird.s ,:... w0.1 ,. ........,. �.y^,+,n.y hqW MaA rd�tY1. ,.., , •. ,:,.,... ,.,,,. ,, ..,,.. w grr .a»„H"e .,.,.�.,.• ,.-- ,«...,...... " «.,.r,..,,.....w..y,r rn-ra.Km{- n•,,•tr a+.n,ar�r.waa,w''w,�r.,r.�wvr"„dra..'.w.r+r.s„y., 4. JAMES W. DURHAM . LEE JOHNSON ,p Deu ATTORNEYG Q� �. Tp ENCRAk ATTORNEY GENERAL. F. ..•,,� ', 1A ..,..-:-:; 2 • DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE „' 100 STATE OFFICE 3UILDING SALEM, OREGON 97310 TEL.FPHONE: (803) 378.6368 May 1, ,1975 Honorable Pat Whiting State Reps:esentative , House of Representatives Salem, Oregon 97310 ' Re: opinion Request Op--3253 Dear Representative Whiting s . This is in response' to your request for our opinion whether an initiative meast1re being circulated for signatures which would amend the city charter of Tigard, is unlawfully '. arbitrary or unlawfully vague. The `proposal reads 'Regardless of zoning there shall not be a . . restaurant, fast food service, drive--in or other such high volume traffic business, constructed or operated within 750 feet of the nearest perimeter oyf an public y p lic orparochial school ground,sexcept those currently in operation and are within these areas.• y. None of the currently operating restaurants , within these areas shall remodel or change. their operation such a' manner as to conflict . p h ' the intent of this amendment. " Oar conclusion is that the aMendment Would be valid and self-executing except xcept as to the °o her such high +gh volume t raffic css, F which would constitute a directive> to the city lLo cla :Ify and augment the intended proscription. : The proposal in eff'ect would amend all of the city's zoning ordinances It has long been recognized that cities may y ' L.._ '+ i _ many ' where the purpose so feet of a school, roh�.b�.t certa�.n p p young people from traffic hazards in 14th. S{ree't Warehouse Corporation V Murdock, 291 NYS 420 (1937) court co. i ordinance which prohibited the thens�.dered an maintenance of a . par3�ing ax�a; e for more than five motor Within 200 feet from a school entrance or e dt. The. Court sai •d Illir- , l r r .la,¢. i u4r�rw y._. ,.,m .. ..,,�..,� .: ...., r. .sir.., • AnM1r,Q Y,..=.'rt�Tw{M r+•+4im•,W�:xlrMW1AA"„b1,o�+fh.M,W.N � �•u}(M I W `,Fi%"'• *4,"kM'h�tlmthEt! , WL.Fw.Maw•x,w.uuwW,e.wyMyy*4 } y,J ting_ .anorable Pat h ,page 2 May 1, 1975 • " provision should receive a construction consonant with the beneficent purpose for which it was enacted. In construing a remedial statute of this kind the court will not 'resort to the art of i the rhetorician, but will be quick to aid the ' accomplishment of the end for which the statute . • was designed. . Whatever uncertainty there may exist in the meaning of this provision should be resolved in favor of the safety of school children for whose protection it was enacted." 207 NYS at 423 . 1. "While legitimate business should not be stifled or restricted by unnecessary hardships , , such. "considerations must yield to the greater public interest involved in the maintenance of safeguards for school children. " 297 NYS at 424 . Murdock456 See also' 'S' G'a'ra;ge` 'Corpora'tion V.' , 5 5 NYS 2 d • .__._ � s, 1922) . (194 5} and Scha�t V.' 'Senior,, 117 A S.L-7 N• to protect school children from Another, type of ordinance prohibiting, , . ' cessar traffic hazards is thatfilling � un'ne y s v.` Cityof' Martin, r 51 SW2d 237 stations near schools . ' Higgs gg .- . . wenn 192) upheld an ordinance providing, in order to lessen traffic congestion, that no filling station could be estab- . li8hed within 300 feet of any . _ p• .9 3 withinschool, church �E 186 ,i dal. 246 NYS 280 (1930) , affd. 1 In Zn'; Re Peck, the court approved an ordinance that said "No, garage. • ' gasoline filling station shall have an entrance or , and no, p • exit for motor vehicles within three hundred feet • ' of < µ exitprivate School. " The the. entrance or of a public or Court observed • "A reading of the ordinance shows that , the. general purposes served by it are entirely f reasonable and in furtherance of the public welfare. " 246 NYS at 281. + . , . � � n of • use of the cr�terio Our' oto Supreme�Court has app is for prohibiting roved gp g incr`es:sed traffic con esta.bn as a bas t:�vit (in th s case, a church) froma given certain ac Y Mu len,, 2l4 or 2814 33a2d In: ','eliovah s' witnes ses v. area. 5 (1958) the court said .'" . 0when. we speak of traffic hat . s arils and congestion on the streets b any city, we are ' . ` talking about a condition tion of potential danger anger tc klife and property which ipoint of public welfare extends beyond the boundaries of any wined„ area and the interests of those who reside within it.t" 214 Or at 312 -313 } 11 pat '�1hit.�� g • • . �' �onorala�.e Page 3 May 1, 1975 er There rare few dangers to public welfare that are so all-embracing as are the dangers and 1 hazards to youngand old springing from traffic • on our highways. " 214 Or at 313 .' • Such recognition by the courts of the importance of protecting _° the young (and old) from traffic hazards leads us to conclude . � that the prop osed amendment would not be ruled unlawfully arbitrary. We are aware that the Oregon Supreme Court has ruled that . distinctions drawn in land control must be "rational" ; , see° Or'�g'on` C 'ty ��' Hartke, 240 Or 35 , 400 P2d 255, although • . ' the dee sin s based on a statute, unlike here) and that 750 feet ` is two and one-half football fields long. In a given circumstance court mayfeel the amendment leads "irrational" �,� an ;7e have result and thus may be invalid in its in application.ion ttia.e hae point the �1 � located no Oregon authority directly �, of land use control, but we note what is said in Socony Mobil. Oil" Co; flown"s'h'ip o'f oceand 153 A2d 67 (N.J.. Sup. 1959) " regarding an ordinance that prohibited service stations from 1,500 feet of eachr_ •` b� zig within other: ' • " an ordinance that may operate reasonably in some circumstances and unreasonably in others is not void in' 't'oto, but is enforceable except where ular circumstances •its operation would ;� in the 'p�rtii be 'unreasona`ole and of Pensive 153 A2d at 71 1 a provision suchwe conclude that the judiciarywould not void that proposefor children' s safety, but would enforce it against restaurants, asfast. food service (which we understand j ., . ry "drive-in"d drive to be a drive-up servicetheaters. A such ash�oD�he Queen) and in service of any kind, from banksobtained without service would, be any other service which can� _ , ro osaleisbcicar enough '• met with enough app M.,T, � leavingthe cs.r.hale this respect the proposal from the courts and lis�purpose s ... though in a particular that we believe it will be upheldeven g case it conceivably may not be validly enforceable. in. � • other such high v . ..businesses we Re and rf volume traffic bu s ine g -e• the - ro osal would not be self-executing. we believe it believe' p I? s apwell enough that the cit council would .,._. .else policy pr . . take. It i s know'Xwhat type of action it $.s expected to � prevent businesses being established within 750 expected ed Loop feetecof sCh ols which would substantially increase traffic hazards for school children: h tit the entrepenetir is left entirely on his own to obey the < < � . board or , , measure where it is self-»eXec:utng'�yhether�l�.�s is o mea: �. it to tell humproposed commission or cciunc _ • rohibi ion. under such c ircumistances, • " activity come within the p r -«.,-..gyros 0 se+ „, .. .•.. w«.r.P *,m*w,w+....«wnv raArar.e.r rru,«ern.;u-nvn,rVdy�.wwenr. "M'^�7r+1�`�n^�5aitAi � P.�S'J.�d+1 pa �,.,,utllu F.a�d.+�'Q.uw,,.s kc..rrr+.w�. YW�.�. .,��.�1 �..w w..w�q+«.w,.,..«..._rww s�..w.'u�A�'WedeM.+�+s r.l: rw,..r-� , oiraeer�...:� 1 Jnorable Pat Ydh,i tang {' .. .gage 4 May 1, 1975 • without l We do not feel that the proscription of "other such high mplementation • volume traffic business" would be operative by the council. As we noted in connection with the "drive-in" prohibition, ,agreat diversity of activities is encompassed in those specifically prohibited, but the proposal does not purport to exclude• 'all undertakings which will increase traffic hazards: only "other 'such high 'volume traffic businesses." A businessman would not be forced to guess at his peril what is included in such In our' opinion the phrase only declares a policy for , . the city council tocarry out. AsIvor the restaurants being prohibited from changing their operations "so as toconflict With the intentof this amendment," we feel it is clear enough in itself to be 'enforceable. It . , means that a restaurant•, alreadyselling in the business' of r prepared: food. r , cannottake advantageof that statute_. . ' to convert • to a much heavier traffic business. it refers to changing the character of the restaurant, as into a fast food type service, or greatly expanding its capacity. We do not feel this provision leaves the businessman in an unfair position of not knowing what he may do If in a rare case he Is truly in doubt, he can , seek judicial determination. The council, in this case, is not fired to ciu. implement the "provision, but it certainly would re °° more specifically- . prohibited ve authorct'rtaQn�eh1riy on�.hey '°restaurantsc areeSfrom "chanwe gingttheir operations" but assume i. ' ' "changing . .their t� is the "one defined 4 tivit.,�:~whic h .:; considered clearly capable of Changing character . • g g a far-as its effect on traffic is concerned. We do not .believe ascourt would find this distinction legally impermissible. earlyin thisproposal r in., effect. ' ' opinion, the would As noteday' ng ordinance. itself be g I t, could describeddaseaczona.ri ordinance with charter status; or' as �' ~ ° the statement of general policy to be 'found in equivalent to a comp rehensiver lan with all zoning ordinances required to p conform to it. Yet its adoption by the voters would not be pursuant to procedures specified for city planning and toning by ORS ch 227 nor would the ' rocedtiral requirements Oen 1044 at 1047 (1974) p oE ORS ch 197 be Met.. In 36 Op Atty _ ... use o�.°:c ie s ti jl l lanp a we °noted. the "vite�.tablis�imerj.teof detailed landstrict criteria which led to the which local land use decisions must meet. For example, ORS 197.2 , : �Q pr0�'1de S" . `• Ali coni rehens ' e plans a y g r subdivision p n an �on�n s'l other ordinances and re Jg tilations adopted by a ~. and p city,...county or' special district state agency, it tcc carry out such plans shall be in conformity with • the stat -wide planning goals. . - '..4 1)u..l.kl..'AV Ywi..+..I.:c.. 14..W '.0 ll J 'b4v++J�~MIN.iMMJ °1411N••M••M _..._ , E.zq.u...-u....._.:RSIi7Mlfli.�Pl1N'.1}9dgR[.'1:$....,,.,.x.w..:A,T.r r+.e n-W+.-....n r.. .-w.,y-e.ore ry, .:. wnxJ..w .w..w+wr .. .:. .,u .,.x.'^ •,i.,.,.ra.+4e� ,. T a a / r p Honorable Pad Whit( '' w, � ,. Page 5 , May _1, 1975 . lei :,, All state land-use planning ggislations based upon the legislature' s plenary authority to legislate on any matter , not expressly or impliedly prohibited to- it, rather than constitutional authorization. See Straw v . , upon anyspecific " 54 Or 424 , 103 .P 777 (1909) In contrast, the right Harris'voters of Tigard to amend the city charter of Tigard of the • ` is specifically, guaranteed by Or Const„ Art XI, §2,, providing in relevant part: l ' !rhe legislative Assembly shall not enact, ract of incorporation � amend or repeal any charter or cityor town. The legal for any municipality, voters of every city and town are 'hereby granted power to enact and amend their municipal charter, ' subject to the Constitution and criminal laws • of the State of Oregon This d nxowever, give city voters the right to negate within the city, by charter amendment, any state legislation relating to a matter of paramount state 'concern„ 6 OiC1.966) ; ncity of ' Woodburn 'V.' +St'a.te� Tax Coh�ri w , ,243 633 413 'P Or , see also State V. C'it.y of Mi1waukee23i Or 473; 373 Ptd 680 r f ' jy �, _ sought by charter amendment to adopt •(1962 c�.�. voters z oning provIsiona contraveriing state wide land use planning policies we have no doubt that such an amendment would be .. ..e ,�, held invalid. But here we. have a regulation which though it sula�tantaiall a.ff relat s" land lase has a paramount concern : c.ng to saf ety of school Children. It is difficult tci . j Yplanning state policy goals, or see how it could contravene any statewide any provision of a comprehensive plan Whichp y might require. We hesitate to say that citizens may at any time by-pass the . statutory procedure d.urc for amendment to a zoning ordinance or comprehensive plan by using the device of a charter amendment, so loo as the particular provision is not inconsistent with state policy. Substantial s--ate policy reasons for the There i some residual procedures exist as well. s accordingly 6",' that- the proposed charteramendment would be sustained ubt - � on this basis. do .,, � 13ut the proposal' s toning if challenged y .. y - ato its direct concern with public licatons are Secondary . , safety. note t it cou y with diff icuity) irrt a ld (aw�wardl and .. ,, We that regulation of vehicular crossing of be •recast in -t.er�ms of regulation vicinity of a school, so that it public sidewalks in the P would notthat provision at all. on lance i resemble a coni J the proposed charter amendment we `aceord�.:ng�Ly Conclude that valid for failure to follow would not be 'held in' the presCribed procedures got a zoning or comprehensive plan change . Sync rely t OHNSOI AtigorneY General y • CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the City Council at the Fowler Junior High School Lecture Room, 10865 SW Walnut, Tigard., Oregon, on May 12, 1975, at 8:00 p.m. with } respect to the following: Proposed amendments to Chapter 18.28, General Commercial Zone and Chapter 18.32, Neighborhood Commercial Zone, of the zoning ordinance of the City of Tigard with respect to • ; permitted uses, conditional uses, lot requirements and landscaping. All interested persons may appear and be heard in favor of or against the said proposal: BY ORDER 0P THE CITY COUNCIL DORIS HARTIG CITY RECORDER r . Publish TT May 1-and May 8, 1975 irk a . .,.. ,i . y r. r., ur ..,.. ,.a r r i. •,e. _,,v, r I. ,. .,r r i r r 4. ..uc...v urtarrls.„+�wtl .-. . ..r... r r ...,N w P+..y..f ...w++c•...w,+«yrr+MFtlhrtKmR+•,Rr.nrclM°+ .Yi A.ciLsrl7M..!{••.4.W+urk'4'vl.w k.+++RLhr,- • r AFFIDAVIT PUBLICATION iVet) 4: ,. u ,: .• STATE OF OREGON; f\v) ?) w9 ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON; 717 iN .a aaAn N__a. _. tlas.eph,...$claaf • u.w r' being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the publisher -:.:N..F. of The Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined P,IVI w t pect to e,"foli*owingi "'<' guhlished at Tigard, in the aforesaid count • by ORS-193+010' and 193.020, Y anda. e'o he Cit 'oi T`i rd h tf iL. F ; loving chapter;s6to lie con'si el;e�, `fo 'e"'' 0 state, that the legal notice a which is hereto annexed, was f printed copy of ,.It _tib r al Farm b e lS 62 �„ published m the entire issue of said newspaper f � rid t i > ri . 2 ' " or µ..N..:�..... ,a_�:..:.. successive and +�;I Gonnnneroz l I e4fes'sionai (l$4th) C-3 Gteneral Clorxtm lal, ] � consecutive weeks in the following issues .•,wF .,:.N:a..: .:...:.: :..u.:N.":... General,(18.12 �' 1 1 .-::•w.:,.:..;.q.�_,,.`.�•a.s►afi�ta�lar.►a...,„a+,�a.�.t�lr 41)1'11 17 & 24 x.975 NFS,AilPdo F. _ .•amodint�eiPsltaru,r1tai(el 1D8.r5e�7�i)`F, Rjs et i ei7 s��yy`+ri8{{° 'Y$ «(i (Sig Lure) Proposed htOd eats o N'}h e k 1 Plan relating,tai co iinercw, +'Su � _' p`}�1p(rt(.J� wd7rn to before,me this 24th da of cia ` s'y�s,';hy.�s (ykNi. eiV}yy ' k Ei 14' :.ap.an. .:a....a y F.aµ�acF.s ,t„ �li j*o ooCoW G1 6 ` j� �•JJ W l� r� ' ��,gip ��r' and.`be heard'in.favor o o �,� a n thea Oaid:itt'`oPoSai , , • COUNCIL.f� , e's _a_”C+t,r t •r 1� • � ti• a +•� .-a•,,..Na•a:_r_ � +✓�1.� �iJ\.+.\✓�� ' Notary public of Oregon . , �'� dt .P��1� A r i 1 ��d��# 9�5 +�yV2 , ul�1a:41 I(f� ,5 i 79°..p • r-� /. � r+�n�.�Fvrnr..eRouf t...,Ma•I�+;nped� in b,y.,..,,s,)>�."'Y""'��•tt My cottilnmssioit a*pzres .»aaa4u..pN.•.°. N..•.�,a,. 19 " • • • • ,.. wo.0».....,... a+,wp..Na,y:r.aa.-,ur.,,s w.:,ncn�p..«„..x�.e;w.ra �............v.w..+w..,.rw...,.},:..,..a..w•.rww,r.•.w°wwwenw.-. vflbm_:A Pi,.Y nP�'4`M7?'A,�tl'X9AIr�. 'y;ltY^�v'k'.. ,,..,.,,,; ..,� �,..�. ,-.� TIGARD CITY COUNCIL STUDY' SESSION & EXECUTIVE SESSION , APRIL 21, 1975, 7:30 P.M. FOWLER JR. HIGH SCHOOL LECTURE ROOM AGENDA: 1. ioy Scouts Building Donation for City Park. 2. Parking .. Vicinity of Tigard Home Furnishings. 3. S.W. 115th Street L.I.D. , 4. Vacancy Appointments. 5. S.W. Hunziker Street L.I.D. 6. Other 7. Status of Union Negotiations -. Executive Session • /9i )r • ,- .. ,. �uvimirX".tamatNxsv:M.x.a . yhYLUuo-7Y.1J41uJ",waW W+h+wa»�4X�'a. April 18, 1975 Board & Commission ion Vacancies, EXISTINGS TERM EXPIRES BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS Lawrence Arneson 2-14-75 Rolland J. Daniels 2-14-75 PARK BOARD , Beth Bishop 12 3174 • Karl Hanneman resigned 6A.k...30 76 Don HanSon - resigned 12-31-76 Betty Jack - resigned 6-30-78 • SITE DEVELOPMENT & DESIGN REVIEW Architect 3-1-75 Monte Cook,n Business Man resigned 3-1-75 Phillip Edin, Alternate James B. Mann,. Architect 3-1-75 Alternate Jon Kelting, Business Man 3-1-75 NOISE COMMITTEE resigned Automatic Virginia Ericson Disbandonment upon • completion of task UPCOMINGq • PLANNING COMMISSION • Clarence Nicola r Lynn Wakem 7-2-15 , .. pw+w.p..Fv rjNv«.nvai.4Wr6v rv.ay n.,wxnlr+y-.l pjM� , rWn..Wr .uwup.ra..wHrr. ,.w.0 r.r«nwrr/'"'nj"^F2'YY-N6vMe1+dM+bON'W'C3^4L'R^q•l4dYKsl/hGk7lWYYlhWWWWk1.... . w TIGARD - CITIZENS AND POLICE (T-CAP) MEMBER. REPRESENTS' . TERM EXPIRES. . Gary Nashf, Chairman Citizen at large 2-77 Carl. Pykonen Citizen at large 7-75 Roy Rogers Organization Rep. 4-75 * Edna Sake to Citizen at large 11-76 Charles' Samuel Citizen at large 7-75 Arthur B,:ederman School: Dist. Rep. 7-75 ` . . Pant Cook Business Rep. 7-75 77S ' Rev. Clark Enz aeligious Rep. w ** . Arthur Haas School Dist. Rep. 7-75 Religious Re� 1-77 ..%., ' S sten Maty ICidora g Organization Rep. 3-76 # '� , 277 #Organization Rep. • OrganizationRep. 4.78 ' Organization Rep. 1-16 iE Organization Rep. » :** 7 75 Student Rep. 4`78 Citizen at large 4-78 a Gi.tien at large 4-78 * Would like to ice»appointed term expiring 4'784 Would need to be filled in three frrontlis ),; ,w,.:, # 'inexpired ' hrm5..� ,wn+w..rr�ww+.w ,s�n !rv.awv�eww.,...�.�....+a�m,,rr«rr+a .r,«,�..�..«•.�y-..., ,..., ......a„x•+�.,,�..wr.,r.w+wxg . ,:.... .:., '.„ ..,_ ”+i .�'�xv •.•C.,r-axc4s:rt�*r�.�J«.rk'.+4taaw.r- +'i�»w��e..I-r„�y. • • iwtb/.a . P. 0. Box 23557 12420 S. W. Main Tigard, Oregon . 7223 April 17, 1975 • rI : A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL WILL BE HELD AT 7t30 P. M. ON MONDAY, APRIL 21, 1975 IN • THE LECTURE ROOM HIGH,'VILER JUNIOR AT THE NEW FOWLER � 10865 S. W. WALNUT FOR CONSIDERING THE FOLLOWING • 1, AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE 115th LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, . • 2. AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE A SUBDIVISION • COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT RELATING TO TERRACE TRAILS SUBDIVISION, 3 UNION NEGOTIATIONS' UNDER EXECUTIVE SESSION, • •.c,• r..-��i.��`��/.lief/ ,, f r�.,..�r+`�1..�J ("f"a Mayor STUDY SESSION WZGI, .. � FOLLOW IMMEDIATELY AFTER AST ITHE' Sp'ECIAL MEETINGa ...�„... • o April 4, 1975 MEMO TO: City Council and City Administrator City of Tigard, ,Oregon FROM: Anderson, ,Dittman & Anderson SUBJECT: EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN LAND USES WITHIN SPECIFIED DISTANCES FROM PUBLIC AND ' PRIVATE SCHOOL GROUNDS ' ' We have the following comments to offer with respect to the request of a citizens group that certain use activities be excluded as a permitted, conditional or otherwise use within any zone in any area within 750 feet of any public or privately owned school offering educational opportunity to kindergarten, grade or high school level students. It is our understanding that the exclusion would operate with respect to restaurants, "drive-ins" or so-called "fast service" activities, presumably involving frequent in and out motor vehicular traffic. The prime motivation or basis for concern presumably involves the safety oftheattending Studentswho Would be exposed to the vehicular trafficgenerated bythe activityy .. A seri eftlt usesportof actiVitiesathat would s to beoproscribeds yy ` Y c Itmightbe pointed out that quick in andoutvehic- and de c be thep �' trafficisgenerated.. , types the restriction. . , alar raeb manyt es of retail activities, ins \` cluding grocery stores, automotive service stations drive-in and other banking, and office activities, as well as restaurantsf all of which are either permitted or conditional uses in commercial zones, It has been recognized by the Courts ini certan.cases that Y restaurants, aS commercial uses; are sufficiently distinct from the generality of such uses that they may be separately classified nd excluded from Some Commercial districts, and that they may be permitted only with prior approval by the zoning commission* A readily perceivable distinction may be drawn betWeeh the restric tions on sales of liquor by the drink or otherwise and those activ-i& ties whichdo not involve liquor sales in any form. The regulation of restaurants which sell alcoholic beverages ;,ia said to have much in commone licensed by the state and subject to city . g and St Which With the regulation of package sales of li, uors all o is clear that anyactivity that sells intoxicating State �.`.�_/�� l.t ' Y Y } Y � cGiti.iZg. a y liquor in anydistinctly activities that q gdliThose activities n form can be class have no involvement in intoxicating So involved may be additionally regulated in recognition of the par-, ticular problems within the health , welfare, safety and nuisance sphere Based on our research and analysis of the problem, It is our opinion that the -City would not be constitutionally proper in adopt- ing an arbitrary rule with respect to all so"called quick service buck rule mWit be premisedtain distance of a school b�si,nesses within a certain activity, but that there is in laacft , on a determination consideration of health, public welfare and safety. It is otir further redommendation that any such general restrictions be subject to conte ditronal Use proViSioneSo that gsra could uidg given and determination Made baited on hearingandroceduralelines eStab' Y a Page 2 ,. } City Council and City Administrator April 4, 1975 lished by the Courts for quasi-judicial proceedings. Any other ! approach would be difficult to maintain and could be easily con- strued as arbitrary and capridious without any reasonable 're- lation to the problem sought to be overcome. This is not to say, however, that the conditions under which a conditional use would ' be granted'or denied cannot be included in the ordinance, to thus provide guide lines on which the applicant could rely. Ili effect, this would place the so-called fast service ac- tivities on the same footing as motor vehicle service stations and drive-in food service are •now considered under the zoning ordi- nances. FAA:pml • • • it Y {, tl Ali A' 4 • 'MINUTES Tigard Planning Commission April 1 1975 - Regular Meeting • Twality Junior High School - Lecture Room 14650 SW 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon 1. .CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7t30 p.m. 2. , ROLL CALL Members present: Hansen, N coli, Popp, Porter, Sakata, Wakem, Whittaker. Commissioner Ball arrived at 7:40. Staff: Powell, Laws and Planning Director Bolen. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the preceding meeting were not available to be read. Staff requested that amendments dealing with Sections 18.12.040, 18.12.050, 18.92 060 be' dropped from the agenda. Chairman Whittaker directed that these changes be made in the agenda. Planning Director :Bolen indicated that he would like to discuss the Planning Department work program in the time available be fore the public hearings would stat"t. He indicated that the department would not be able to complete the work program an- ticipated n-tic pated for 1974-75, but that NPO formation for NPO's 4 and. 5 is getting under way, Nansen asked what the composition of those NPO.'s would be and indicated his dissatisfaction with the conposition of previous NPOts Whittaker asked if i..�` staff would do an analysismake-up oJ the makup of the area concerned in each NPO with the intent to make the NPO 'balanced with response from both business and resident sectors b 6• It Was suggested that various interest groups could be listed of amount land resources nd nced inst • committed possiblyommtted tthe avariousasectors erepresented within theNP boundaries: foleni suggested that three alternativescould be produced by the p Planning Department for formation of each NPO. A report would be made to the April study session reflecting those alternatives. Pd Minutes - April 1, 1975 - page 1 , , 4. PUBLIC HEAR'INGg: 4.1 Subdivision Preliminary Plat Approval Si -75 (Scott Properties) This preliminary plat approval is for a subdivision considered previously by the Planning commission as Scott Planned Development (ZC 5-75) A. Staff Report Staff report was read by Bolen (see attached) . B. Public Testimony Tes- imUn,�r fors Pat Thomas, Robert Myers Engineers, addressed the water pressure problem pointed out by the staff report and introduced a letter from the Tigard Water District con. cerning their solution to the problem. Oppos%ng testimony none C. Staff Recommendation APPROVAL withno conditions, it being pointed out by • Bolen that all necessary conditions have been attached to the approval of the Planned Development. D. Commission Discission and Action Motion to approve (Hansen) , seconded (Wekem) , approved unanimously 4.2 Zoning Ordinance Amendments ZOA 1-75 Proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance considering revisions of parts of several chapters and sections Chairman Whittakerwith the asked that the agenda order be modified to allow those items most interest to be heard :first. A. Amendment of Chapter 18.28 - General Commercial Zone , Sections 010 Permitted Uses, 020 Conditional Uses, 030 Lot Req,uirementS, 040 Setback Requirements and 060 Additional Requirements ') (1) Staff Report Read b Bolen (see att.. . .. dmemorandum, rn , Re . vision OftheC �� General t) PC Minuted April 1, 1975 - page 2 e _ ti rt- (2) PubLc Testimony Dick Kleumpke, Chairman.. of NPO #3 9 testified in favor of the proposed zone changes. John Flattery, Lincoln Properties Co. , testified that the zone changes proposed he felt were much needed ' in a community such as Tigard. Cliff Ashley, Chairman of NPO #1, testified that the changes in the zoning ordinance proposed here were long overdue. (3) Staff Recommendation APPROVAL (4) Commission Discussion and Action Ball voiced his concern about the practice of all conditional uses in a less intensive zone being conditional uses in a more intensive zone making conditional uses allowed in an A-2 zone allowed in a. C-4 zone, conditional uses allowed in a C-4 zone 3 zoned felt allowed in a C- He that this would allow mobile home parts in a C-3 zone and this was inappropriate moved to approve, specifying that tire retreading .' Popptonal use #30 allowed in a C-3 zone) be deleted • - (conditional per previous zoning ordinance amendment, Permitted use #8 (Film Exchange)and the proposed addition of distribution center be clarifiedto read ii 0Flm Distribution Centeril and excluding mobile home art from either conditional use or permitted. use in zone c (porter) seconded and the motion passed unanimously $, Amendment of Chap 18u40 - Commerc "al-Professoxaal. Zone, Chapter Section 0.011 (conditional uses) (l) Staff Findings Staff tr,morandum HAmendment of C-P zone to clarify b a o " read by )dwell (see attached) . (2) Public Testimony There was no public testimonyo (3) Staff Recommendation • APPROVAL PC MihUtes April 1, 1975 - page 3 . (4) Corry' ssion Discussion and Ac tj(X The Commission considered the staff recommendations with respect to the lack of positive direction with. respect to a policy for development in a C-P zoned Wakem moved to table to allow more detailed consider- ation of a change of land uses to be allowed in this zone. (Sakata) seconded and the motion passed unani- mously. C. Amendment of Section .070 (Signs in the Commercial-Pro- fessional zone) (1) Staff Findings .P Staff memorandum "Amendment of Che 18.40.070" was read by Powell (see attached) (2) Public Testimony Mike Oberhoffer, Farmers Insurance Corp. , asked if proper consideration had been given to the varying ..• setbacks, foliage, terrain, differing uses and building sizes that occur on some large sites in n the Commercial-Professional zone4 He said that' the sign . regulations presently applying in the Commercial-Pro- fessional zone did not adequately deal with hiS pro- ject and j that the proposed amendments do not speak to the difficulties Farmer's has, especially with • respect to directing visitor traffic to the proper site within Farmer's. John Flattery, Lincoln Properties, said that he felt Jo allowingfree-standingictve in tithe the wording � -stig signsadjacent am entrance could be e or, enough. , said that the wording • is far too copentVe He interpretation ( "weasel Wording"). for and that the sign size has to be geared to the size of buildings and the size of the project. (3) Staff Recommendation APPROVAL (4) Commission Discussion and Action Porter asked the reason for considering this revision. Staff explained the reasoning behind the proposed revision and the reason for bringing it up at this t .xned r y "5. . ,ft. maximum►utsize N�.col�. Said the � ,� sq in sub- section A is really an insufficient sign. size for PC Minutes w Apr . . l) 1975 - page • - (7 for'a large professional office complex Hansen moved thb.t the item be tabled for further dis-- cussion at the study session. Seconded (Nicoll) , Chrmn0 Whittaker asked that the issue be resolved atthis public hearings The question was called. Motion was defeated, Hansen & Nicoll voting "aye". Popp moved to approve, as submitted, with the under,, standing that the variance procedure could be used for such large projects as Farmer's. Bolen pointed out that the variance procedure was not provided to be used for a forseeable circumstance, but to alleviate hardship in the unforseeable occasion. 1discussion at the April Motion to table (Hansen) Vote ...tin Second Sakata)r passed u.nanimously0 15 meeting,g, s Staff was directed to develop criteria� ;-rer ,a for consider- ation of signs greater than ordinance minimum. D. Amendment of Chapter 18, 48 '- M-4 Industrial Park zone, Section 0020 (Conditional Uses) Staff asked that this matter be tabled due to lack, of staff preparation. E. Amendnent' of Chapter 18,12 - General Provisio ns, Section 1000 (Yard Requirement Exceptions) , subsection (b) (Vision Clearance Areas).' (1) Staff Report Staff memo "Amendment of 18 12.100 (b) 0 0 0 " was read by Powell (See attache, (2) Public Testimony none (3) Commission Discussion and Aotion Commissioner Wakem Moved to approve, seconded (Saketa) on the condition placed "tree trunks" inthe on that a comma be ced after text to clarify 10" minimum applied to free-standing poles, not tree trunks, Subsection D, Additional Set Backs were then corn • sidered Pd Minutes - April 1, 1575 - page �' 1M.71R1A7141TY��7MR[i1R1R1RIAAR' .." 7'S�,Y9 / � 4'ot. K StjCraReport (1:, read by Powell • (2) Public Testimony none (3) Staff Recommendation • APPROVAL (4) Commission Discussion and Action Wakem asked if Ash Ave was a collector its full length. Staff responded that it was no that it was a p t, collector only between Hill and Burnham Sts. y. Wakem asked if that change would be made in the test and staff indicated it would. Popp moved to adopt as amended, seconded (Wakem) , vote unanimous. Y, F. Amendment of Chapter 18.20 - Single Family Residential Zone, Section .030, Lot Size in an R-7 tone. (1) Staff Findings . Memorandum titled 'Amendment of Cho 18.20.030" by Powell (see attached) . ' (2) Public Testimony none (3) Staff Recommendation APPROVAL .' It was po�nted. out by.. the staff' that this had been a �. request by the building department and that staff didn't know what criteria was used (4) Commission J Y.scussion and Action A W question.., s brought up aS to how the average of widthg a ., might be determined tall moved to table until average lot width could be defined. (Sakata) seconded, vote was urian .mr.us. PC Minutes - April l i 1page 6 75 � ,; , 0 _.. Neighborhood Commercial Zone, M18.32 Amendment of Chapter Sections .010 Permitted Uses and, .020 Conditional Uses (1) Staff Report Memorandum to Planning Commission read by Bolen. (2) Public Testimony none (3) Staff Recommendation: APPROVAL • (4) Commission Discussion and Action Whittaker spoke to the need for changing lot size and frontage requirements in this zone as well as in • the C-3 zone Moved (Ball) to adopt the staff report taking mobile • homes out of conditional uses and tabling lot size and landscaping to the next meeting. Seconded (Sakata) Vote unanimous. H. Amendment of Chapter 18.52 Industrial Park Zone, Section .010 - Permitted Uses and 0020 Conditional Uses. (1) Staff Findings • read by Powell • (2) Public Testimony none (3) ,Staff Aecommendatioh TAA1Lt for reconsideration with broa. er arenam'wr t to . .,r, manufacturing at a later date o {tryt-y /+�y�q i ` Y '♦ld.l C n and AC " (4) ddmmisson biscusson N Moved (Ba11) to adopt staff report and "Ga` e seconded (Sakata), Vote unanimoue 1 .. Amendirien�► of Cha �` pter' 1S '59. Architectural Design e 'w., Section 0OIO .: jurisdiction and Powers ofDesign Lew Board (1) Staff Report Pc Minutes - April 1 1975 -- Page 7 1 c, 1 • Memorandum read by Powell (Z) Public Testimony none • (3) Staff Recommendation • APPROVAL (4) Commission Discussion. and Action Ball questioned the appropriateness of criteria contained in present ordinance for reviewing signs, specifying that the committee that had written the ordinance originally authorizing the Design Review Board had removed criteria for the consideration of signs when it redrafted the ordinance, omitting sign control from the purview of the Design Review Board Hansen said that he was concerned about the powers of the Design Review Board and would like to do some research before voting on this proposal.. Moved to table (Porter) , second (Popp) , vote was unanimous. • . 5 OTHER BUSINESS • There waS no other business. 6 ADJOURNMENT The meeting waS'• adjourned at it.25 p.m. • . r • • Pc :Minutes - April 1, 1575 - page , is • Memorandum To: Planning Commission Fromrf; Staff Subject: Amendment of Ch. 18.12.100 (b) to decrease minimum height of vision clearance area to 8 feet and extending the appli- cation of the vision clearance area to all driveway entrances and increasing the size of the clearance area on entrances to major arterials and Pacific Highway Date: April 1, 1975 1. 18. 08. 560 Vision clearance area. "Vision clearance area" means a triangular area on a lot, at the intersection of two streets or a street and a railroad, two sides of which are lot lines measured from the corner intersection of the lot lines for a distance specified in these regulations. The third side of the ` triangle is a line across the corner of the lot oinn the ends of the. other two sides. . � Where the lot � g lines at intersections have rounded corners, the lot lines will be 'extended in a straight line to ,a point of intersec- tion. The vision clearance area contains nolantin p g, walls, three feet he _ permanent obstructions exceeding structures or temporary or ight, except occasional tree trunks' or poles. in ; The vision clearance area shall be measured from the top of the curb or, if there is no curb b, from the centerline street grade and extend upward ten feet. (Ord. 70-32 Ch. " 280 (part) , 1970) . 2. The reduc ; of the height of the. vision clearance area to 8' Official who has found the present Building from. the present l0 is recommendation jper� sentl0' tobef�;nhexcess of needs. 3. At preSent there is no formal citation of vision clearance stan- dards applying to dards driveway entrances to public streets. A reVieW of Washington County, City of Portland, Multnomah County, and City of Deave' rton codes shows that the vision clearance area requirement is applied to all street intersections and driveway in S on p �_� : open g ubla.c streets ►Staff has re uired such clearance M1 be provided i.; past development proposals in the interest of p public safety and under' staff prerogative. 4. The 201 vision clearance area provides adequate sight distance on local and collector streets. in the case of a designated wherearterial s. may exceed 35 mph, greater sight' • y p , g. distance and ea larger vision clearance area should reate � ld be required, 5`Present Code Provision: ) (b) ,:.'1n all zones, vision clearance areas shall be maintained between all interseo`Ung streets (except alleys) extending twenty feet tacx from the right-of-way intersection along both • • wi irk ., p ntersec'ting streets. Except. sides of the spaces between the or poles, these areas shall be main- tamed,fortainedoccasional tree trunks without sight obstruction of any kind for a Vertical dis- tance between three and ten feet above the ground. Proposed Amendment 18,12.100 Yard Requirement Exceptions • (b) Vision clearance.areas. In all zones, vision clearance , all intersections of public streets and aats �allldbvewa �teritrd . entrance's to public streets. The 'vision defined in section clearance area. shallbe not less than twenty feet on a side as 08. 6 5 0 of this title. On all designated arterial streets (in subsection "dit of this section) the vision eceeless than thirty-five feet on a sid p ' e. clearance area shall be not . and poles' of not more than ten inches in diameter, for occasionaltrtrunks these areas shall be maintained without sight obstruction of any kind for a vertical distance of between three and eight feet above the ground • r., • . Memo= PC 4/1/7 pb.ge 2 of r. t ( p ' Memorandum To: Planning Commission From: Staff Subject: Centerline setbacks for designated arterial and collector streets Date: April 1, 1975 1. Ch. 18.12.100 (d) provides a centerline setback in addition to the,ordinary front yard setback required in each zoning district (if any) . 2. Many changes have occurred in Tigard's street program and in I the automobile traffic patterns and loads since this section of the zoning code was last amended. 3. The arterials and collector streets identified in this code amendment are generally the same as those identified previously. Additions have been taken from the Tigard Community Plan from the NPO #1 Plan and from traffic studies done by or for the City of Tigard. 4. Updates of this section of the , code .should be done as the Com- prehensive -Flan'- - ve •Plan is added to or' modif ith-e - �-� y. Staff Recommendation • Y Ch. 18.12.100 (d) (d) To permit or afford better light, air and vision on more heavily traveled streets 'and on streets of substand^ b. and width; to protect arterial streets; and to have the loca- tion of Structures compatible with the need for the eventual streets widening eetsand streets, setback ortions ofstrshall streets hereinafter tprovidede abutting afternamedwhi�chshall greater than the required be yard dimersion specified in 'the . zone by the number of feet set forth below in the right-hand column, measured at right angles to the centerline of the . t street and, unless otherwise described, measured from the otherwise centerline of the street as constructed and improved with a ';. hard surface pavement or where not paved, from the center=- III line or general extension thereof of the street right-of-way: ADDITIONAL STREET SETBACK All of S.W. Oreenbur Rd.g within city 30 ft. All of S.W. Walnut Ste within city 30 ft All of 8,W. Highway 217 Within city 30 ft. 1 All 'of S.W. Tigard Avenue within city 30 ft. All of S.W Burnham street Within city 30 ft. All of S.W. Durham Road within city 30 ft NI All of S.W `72nd Avenue within dity - 0 f : �. 3 t. v, All ,b„. of S.W. Pref fle Within city 30 ft. All... ll of S.W. McDonald Street within city 30 ft All of S.W. Ash Avenue within city 30 ft All of S.w. t'unziker within city 30 ft Al _.of S.W, Bonita Road within city 30 ft. r 4 ' ( . . STREET 4, YARD REQUIRED All of S.W. Bull Mt. Rd. within city 30 ft. ' All of S.W. Gaarde within city 30ft. All existing streets within city with less , than fifty feet of right-of-way 25 ft. (Ord. 72-68 §1,' 1972; Ord. 70-32 §210-8 1970) i Should be amended to reads • 1 Ch. 18.12.100 (d) Additional setbacks permit or afford. better light, air and v (d) To ision on more heavily traveled streets and on streets of substand- and width; to protect arterial streets; and to have the lova- tion of structures compatible with the need for the eventual widening of streets, a' Setback shallbe provided abutting streets and portions of streets hereinafter named which shall bhan the required yard dimensio .,sped;fied. ire thea a. . be greater � �- 1 ♦•.w r n t+ .e ri ht:: �and zone by -'the number. of, feet set forth, below , 5 column,, measuredto the centerla�ne of the at right. angles' , unless otherwise des. `l measured from the cra bed, street and, centerline of the street as constructed and nd improved'with a ! hard surface pavements or where not paved, from the center- • line or general extension thereof of the street right-of�-wa'y . Additional Center Line ` 'DESIGNATED ARTERIAL STREETSSetback Required , . , • All of SW Durham Rd within the City 0 All of SW' Gree�ribur'g Y Rd. north of No. Dakota) within 40 , theIHall Blvd City ty within hirl the City 40 I4 All of SW Pacific Hwy. , within the City 50 { yLL, - :the City n the . ' d within All of SW �cho�.l�:, 'err R , , - g , + (east of Tiedemdn) withi 30 + . All of SW Tigard' � ' ate within the City, , 0 City All of SW Walnut S y, ,,, WithY�.n the All 68�-h. AveCity , ,+ j0 A y + + .7e (so. ofrpton) within City'OT 7'�i'ii3�Av' I�a� � x �`�h �� -(she �, 4°` All. UES/GNATED COLLECTOR STREETS , + Within u 30 , All of SW Ash Ave: the City Bonita Rd: within the City �� of SW � � ` r AllMountain Rd. Within the City 30' .� All of SW Bull �i.n + � . Within the City .�'�.:�.. of SW Burnham St. C Memo - 4/1/75 - page 2 0f 3 I —r--- _ • . • };:+ within the. City .''' A11: of SW Cascade St. 30 Al). of SW Commercial St. within the City, S Gaarde St. within the City 3 All of �.W 30 aStt..�w thin ty ,Cran:�., . ,� the ;of SW� No. Dakota) 30 .. ft i. of SW, 1Rd. sou.1.h1: of S�' Gre enb�rt� ntheCity wthi , 3 All of SW Hampton St within the C1ty, All. of SW Htynziker St. within the City C 3 All of SW Main St. within the City ' ' 3C ' -All, of SW*mcDonald St. within the Cit within the City 30 A�.l. of SW No.a Dakota30 All. of SW Pfaffle Rd. within the City . . 30 . All of SW Summerfield . Jar. within the City 0 H ', All of SW, Tiedeman ,S`t. within the City All of F SW 121st Ave. within the City . . 3U LOCAL STREETS All other existing streets Within theCity 25 1 Y • .. ..+ ... 1,«.r ..• e . .. , . .au...m.r:n.r..w+•.0 r.-.gra...♦�....s.s ...r w.. .. . c.-..w _. -.. it • M .s #, 1 PC Memo - 4/1/75 page 3 cf r ....-... w..,-,+.,-m.,.-..w«.. «........r+.mow,�..x.w �...,.-....t�r..m�-,-ia,..n..v..,.l...r.nm ,� ..,.MNm,..,e�.l...w.e•..,wr-+.....A.a.l-..-......,N.w�.�4 ..LF.:.I-.,..._... .-An+. ......r:.t..,.n..wl.H+-,r ,.4�....a.rw.._.w,n«_.-a-...,wW..4-.,-.F.,w...,.«,,. ..rr........+a.hamm........n.k.....-...-.. ...--,........,._. g.. , .,._.a.-«,,,,.._ n.o-+n....m-:,:r...ten ....x:.. ,4.xr.u..,:n.H.,,....4 ..,...,.�,.:..-....,.. . ,.a... ._r. -...r............... ..,.. ... ‘,..P. .. .. 9. -' .4 , { AFFIDAVI1 ,JF PUBLICATION , ,,,?i,„1, .•IC'.• r STATE OF OREGON, li ° ,;� ',ik ; , 4 Y� 49 "� '� 4 a �1 � �. 1,, i 0 4n, ,i s t r� COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ss, n ' M` '' '..k �{,`,),�ti. ,, .''!s )fib •,s .* e ;, .'i.*.L ,"'' 3}� ,,# ionito. Joseph S cha e3 I S .i l as . ,6,..1.,,. „ wIc. -.i ,, .a tb,4.4»„.»YYa.Y wawa:a,.».,.,.,;p..Ya.:µY.,w,., .:aY.au..,....w.._Y .L..L.aw4,.«.;,.....:,L:.,.:,-,a,+.a.,,«.« .. � 9 '�t1 �, "r�t�9} . • ,;�Ir',,,,,e, ,:ww,,, 1.5 .,i,,,7, ..,,,k,,,4.,.;,,, , w�+ e3 e y ti • g.. '„ t — beingfirst duly sworn depose and. say that I am the publisher ._.....4... ,.+' p ob#4, ec , • ' ..,,.,a,Y„»..»»»;wa... a newspaper of general circulation, as defined , '��,��.�� ,��” '�,��;�;� � t s°�, '•»� of The Tigard Times' ?,1 ' 1 lnna ° pro ' 4. b e Y'' .� b R by ORS 193,010 and 193,020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and, `+ t� ` iii dP..1,9,00-1„)f.{¢ t;d 0 ,, ias n'gt, i n Zil 1,,',7, x„ M 1 fwhich is thereto annexed,..d w �, w q ', '` • state• that , "" the legal notice, a printed copy o exe , as °sro"uth 91 ', , r" • r . ad,on S `'> , ” �» ,+� 1oc tecl�a•• a �matei iitl(� ee published• lis in the entire issue of said' newspaper for ........—., L succesSwe and p b • tt� Avg i ` � � li �c era� drrl�nts'fo t�a�,�onirg ' r(inknce,, t`,,h' City of T gorily the fi0l-`,,, .,,i consecutive weeks in the following issues .s.Ya, i.aLa;.w._aa ,.aa=w4;aw.,,,W,»_.a:.�a4.�, �1b1!yw{v�ln�e�y�, e�gto�b cdn,�idei�,4l��faryro« " fY+,r1. 4,F,t♦1�' S ial ,' V,+1'..,‘„',„,,4,,,, 4VLI» Il ,a Ma 'c 27a ±9 ._-. t k (y� s ., e...:4w..wwLeaa4.a...�...««_.._...L:a,.»..- ------., s4:::: .a:�...:... -:L:.ww«::«w.... .aa» .,a..waY4,. :,L.w .,,..LYYY V �i� �7 +� 1�� r� ,,�t��i's� #��et"�ela�`p t'e sx as ��,�� , N rcaa, ;;.: : : waw4. .,.;id i ..34�__..L_.,. t,k Yrs t.i ,0e t' = ,, ,rt.M,.,- ;u ►..,�, aaa ,..:w.aY a 'p,, ;"; 07i,t,Ifigi'e ," if ` .oS dents 1„(1(44„26 • ' . A :. (, `A, Si atlll�e� 'Odti fa , S1Pa t+ r +� )'*.� •1',j`,�, ,,o u+ Fb ( e5v� T1 rt wV Qy�k{" Q 4 } ++7x y.". �YXYMMMy*, �p re. it ' l men S'/lll d;' I8. 8' nj$ np fi^Ilr+"�P • •at r.' �,Archit:r.t ' Rc IY� J� r+. ,� n�le this dad► of Y �: Sae h d.and'sworn to before 27��'. . ,, ,LYµ„ai,.,a_»_w,i.la,:L,L—::aiw LM„n„a � wYriYYa,,, p1 fi4 p ♦ »4 �` y a'El0ocf 41Aid:,#82, ' y"" , C; 'M to t ' A to n r.... 4. ' t �q ?�� II (i'�",^��'� ��.,.y f,':,',All �4 �M �t at�1V � �,:s P. CJf"� �l . .�'C k ^Y:,�t��4 4� ,,,''''.0'�`�1 :'c3 y ,',..1. s 3.fl..7 „Ayll ; 'rr's}oyyns;; An 'inJ,-in ir�tu(yrtti,,,i , i .,1.,++i +LL.'S,wIY}' Ik M " til i LS a4 to n'h o the d�lin "' , l �'"� a s `hear u, y� /J �y j�ly { My, c 6 + ` �"•+',.y,,e�,,�4t�4.. kid ► , .., �«�::....,w r� L.. "'7.'^0"1...+" ij.. ('�p'A��JCY71��t'"�!Ul�l1S� J.YatlrVy(,j� �/�;�4�9/"") � '; rc' k`��A ��v3 MMt� �r +w �,..Yw.._�Y.Y.....�..i...�».»» SH �.��a....i!r,. ...'�1, � � , . , ..-.., ' ,^'L ,i0,001.. S"'W 4.+} ,q eee��''' Notary Public of Oregon 4 A j�'-y l,� ,z +, ' •`' My catnriiission explreS ��+�y ., .;wiLLws,_.L_;..wwLY.aa.! Ya.T.`:L,a+ 19,4,, r. a • t 1 1 i , s' i ti • • • MEMO TO: Tigard Planning Commission FROM: Staff DATE March 25, 1975 SUBJECT: Proposed amendments to the Tigard zoning code (Chapter 18, Tigard Municipal Code) The following amendements are to be proposed for hearing: oh 18. 40. 070 amended to allow free-standing signs in a Commercial-Professional zone under certain conditions. oh 18. 12. 100 (a) amended to allow averaging of front yard set-backs in all zones. oh 18. 12. 100 (b) amended to ds cease the minimum height of the vision clearance cone to 8 feet and applying the vision clearance cone requirement to all driveway entrances to public rights--of-way and increasing the size of the clearance cone on entrances to ma jo C, arterials' and Pacific Highway. ch18. 12. d- 6111ded to establish a centerline setback for S.W. Pacific Highway of 60 feet and increasing the centerline setback for designated arterial streets to 40 feet. ch 18. 28. 030 amended to increase the minimum site size in a C-3 zone to 10, 000 square feet and the minimum lot width to 100 feet. ch 18. 28. 010 and 18:28. 020 amended to delete restaurant • from permitted uses and add restaurants: to conditional uses in a C-3 zone: j j ch 18. 32. 010 (6) amended' to a1loW• pro fese, on l off'c res G�� . , as permitted uses a.n a G�4 zone. ,/,....,& / oh 18. 48. 010 amended to allowontractors materials //,,,epeo,z/ 0 etora a in ah M-3 zone ted- � �--/.n �a °r oh 18. 52 amended to restridt the uses allowed in an M-4 tone: oh 18. 57 and oh 18. 92 amended to provide for a fee to defray costs of processing applications for a special permit to fi11 or build in a flodd plain dio rice �7 r.' ch 18. 58 and ch 18. 92 amended to provide for a fee to defrayy costs of application for site design and architectural. review. ch 18. 59. 010 amended to require Architectural Design Review of all signs requiring a sign permit in • any zone. ch 18.12. 040 amended to allow the required 10 feet spacing 20. 030 amended to require a 60 foot minimum ch .18. lot width, ch 18 59. 040' amended to require a plan check by the building official before submission to the • Design Review Board and making all changes in plans subject to approval by the building official. oh 18. 12.050 amended to allow projection of a deck not more than four feet above grade not more than two feet into. setback areas. i:. . r . ' ( ,/ .. l :-""r , . ' 0,7, c . , . , . . • , • • ......_., • .....____ . , ,, _. •,./ ....... • . . . . . • . .• __ , , .", , ‘...,, .... c • . ......, , ,..., . f. ` 1 4,61,42:c...... c.....1...2...,e...v.4 7./, r . (.,. ../.4....71'7/ 1 _ ,r r 2 2„,../ ',11141:,, Z,5 .' ,, ,' ' A �. \.I.V ,•--/ : 4.........C-0/ '*'1,'V ,"47t./.?"'i// r el' r ., . . , ' - -' q 3 '3 . j } t ;,f s; ......../e 1.' '''' 1 'o'-'e/c/4 ....."1" C,-',1 .' ' • - ,..,2...z....„,, ,,-"*»err.«.-'•---'"+ r :,."..:.;,' 0 '2'-a. ' . ' ' 4.e., '?'''C 'Z' I ' '' ,_,.., ,,. .,, / .....4........ r d 1T.,67„ ,,,,_z.42..,I.,..u.7z,,c_...e,. , , , ..., . . Y , , , , . c) ry „ ''2, e . r , , ,/ / e,,,e • • ‘..4 .'..'.4".. I: • a • G� f d'7,.....),..0..., ......„.„7 P CJ' ZtY.)-'y'L0..... '''i-c. C.”--j • , , . ....,,,,4.,,,,,,Z,,,, . 41.,, . . • 3 • r, . e , . , • . ,v--."2 r • C , • );'''.0,": or -----._ - k ;�rl. •I �1� "., 'i ' . . ,.tip�.....�..,.,.. ..v.w.. ,,... ,., � � <""y ,� .., tri; ',',,q, , ,i y`wl' ,,„ 9 fl 1 Ir '♦"r.... it �rar,. M ' 3'�h t:^ 'i.• .-0 ','..".7`':,1,14.4r40',•;1.. W/ 1114•' �Q� .;w w '1". ,.. ., bw."-d!iJY+is�rh':p.".wfi1 44riA.I11.4, .,.i.. '...!' iM.fn6MWk+"I.�^" .. A ,. .. 7t�!YR.9T `Y-`k�+ma%��yy.�:'.i::t..,''l'',t.:i�" a.,9�#' ,, yy :Iii .._ — "`,:C „ � ;.''..,,14�4 5A. ..ash iter:—.. ,, Ck - ry, i.";, f I,f }' . e " ' ' gyp ' ORS. 1(...so-Xfss e R b �,,„, eiddttozem4.1) 464 . i "'-oe..t.6sit /s-60e) 0 , Ie.,* fg.F.s. . 4{. Y.. rr. ,,,',,,e,,, Z 4 i4c's €01.0,0—u;t.... / - .2c) �IIV� 1 .it,4 Q` i i 'lc- .lb / 4* , . 2.0 000 14;.4,0 Z.5.0(:)0 .0„„,, / elP le-' 00 S Z. S Otr)6 4, 0 3'. 00100 0 }+t 1, j`+ 0 . . t 7'' ; 4.440 ;51; 1-,,L,,...,,,,,,1 ,.,:.,. ''''".4............:,........„,54.,.... „ ...'..... W..IiMwiu,...,,,,k,o...oa.,......way./,..........,:..134.4,,,,,,,,,„,,,..,,,,,,,,..,,,„.„....„,...„,,,v,,,...4strwcroMWr;,a*".x,U y n. 1� o hi 74.4 i 61 j / 72 /.. . ,, ,, e ;:,c, eat, '30 COO 0 ,,. "A.; ,l Y a pl,,, /=:),txt-520c-sel,,,s, ., 1. . 3 3 , 6,76/.5, „.. '� yi „ v �,,�� .i f. i„ .,a ,•";',7—.1-;:',.'',"':"-';',.;-'..'";:'" „:. fir: $4'2 .' . '',.e. (1, ,.% i r 11 P'il? MEMORANDUM 0. ' 1,1/ II • 4 . TO: Planning Commission ,•1,-'. FROM: Planning Department DATE: March 24, 1975 SUBJECT: Revision of the C-3, General Commercial Zone To be considered at the April 1, 1975 Planning Commission hearing is a proposed revision of the C-3, General Commercial zone. According to previous Planning, Commission statements in regard to this issue, it is the understanding of staff „ that revision appears necessary for the following reasons: ..- 1. The existing C-3 zone does not provide the ' ,1; opportunity to review the impact of high traffic generators (such as drive-in restaurants) Opon adjacent Uses or the subject portion of the highway. 41 2. The C-3 zone is the result of pyramiding the city ' s commercial zones into one all-indlueive .zone, permitting the broadest range of commercial uses, regardless of their compatibility or appropriateness for certain highway locations. ..,., 3. Nearly all of the C-3 zoning in Tigard is located 40 on Pacific Highway (which is all zoned C-3) . This zone should therefore reflect the specific needs of .„..I' the area it is designed to serve by containing site development criteria which assure compatibility . with a highway location. . Higher standards for , appearance have also ' been refered to by the Planning Commission as a necessity. 4. NPO Plans 1 and 2 consider uses appropriate for highway locations. To summarize these plans, they find that the Major traffic conflict occuring on Pacific Highway is between local shoppers and through traffic. These plans recommend that no additional businesses catering primarily to the everyday shopping needs of persona residing in 0, Tigard be located on Pacific Highway. These 1 4 0 ' "neighborhood convenience" Uses are advised to 4, I, locate in shopping centers away from the highway. Locations at', 121st and Scholia Ferry koad and at Durham Road and Hall Boulevard are proposed in the Community Plan. ."..' fr, , . ,,,, i 4 e 't4, qi. 5. Pacific Highway is the City' s major arterial and %I 0 persons passing through the community gain their ch.,..., impressions of Tigard from what they see along P-:,... this route. The same is true of most 'Tigard 1,v residents who presently use Pacific for shopping and commuting and for whom the highway is an element of the community they must identify themselVes-Cdith. If Tigard is to develop a , strong sense of community identity and pride this . highly visable portion of the community must reflect the tastes and values of its residents. .•''', 1.31,2,tecties: Using the above stated concerns as a basis, 41, • the following objectives are suggested by the 6K staff as guidelines for considering revisions to the C-3 zone. 1. That uses presenting a potential for threats 11.? ;„. to the public safety by creating traffic hazards and/or pedestrian and automobile conflicts, be ,..4 ,ev,,,. • reviewed by the Planning Commission according to the conditional use provisions. i r 2. That site design criteria will be provided to 110 1;ka minimize traffic conflicts, iMprove highway appearance, and assurb compatibility with .. residential development lying behind the strip .- . development. YO W ' n G 3. That additional "neighborhood convenience" commerclai be discouraged from highway locations. i'...'''',,'i, '---------"///' . • 6-. illir , „,./.,,,,111 0 ,. t ; ,../r ; 0 k e,d ilto,tr'/11'41 ' 4." ' 4 - et,A,„0!„,(iea--e„.d , e _ Z I. / •,' 4,5, 4:i • tyh '4,' •,.. , ucameowuaacr� •�w 4„ in,1, N. ;;;e.� 1828020 • l(i,L, Q I o we c,,fir41 U ) l,: J Uses r y ( 1)--, "z�iy-uu_se pc rm i t t-e ----rn e C 4--aenet- 41 el ( 2) Appliance store (*incidental repairs only) ; r ( 3) Bank, loan company or pther financial institution; inti ., ( 4) Blueprinting, photostating or other reproduction .�� process; A;' ( 5) Business machines, retail sales and service; 1 J " 6) Commercial schools such as business colleges, ,v rftRr,. music conservatories and trade schools; 1 , 7 rh furniture 'i .. 1 Film excn ( `71•5i.r10 v te= CI-del.-ter. - 1 , 1 . :i ( C`.e l erC ,w, ( 9) Frozen foodlocker (family use only) ; � i (10) Hotels; (ll) Instruments, scientific or professional (repair ''; rt F, t; C shop) ; , C (12 d ewelry stor- " s"411' i'`... •-"e•ica --dentacl . tM1 t (14) motel; o e ' '.f1k (15) Newsstand; t, (16)-'''pro essiona or commercial office building.:*) -01 Real estate office; j' „/„(.1‹).........±t2_,--- . • ,' a 4 94 nrs urant (c)tecpt da- e-- -/ r: (20) Sporting good store;. -A nwr --0 rte Of-dJ O 7O-32 ' f 1970) r„.. , �.4 O 1 , `. ' �� - .d,z,„tit.., C 3 zone the follow- t � 1. � • 18 , 28. 0 O Conditional uses. I��/n 9t�hem,titted as conditional ing uses and their accessory uses /4 ! k'er ,, 7 2 and 18. 84: e`--'4=04!”-� ,., „ �,- ' uses win in accordance with Chapters 18 :; qr� I pec Uses ar + Any conditional Use as permitted in a C-4 zone sr w ( 2) +Amusement enterprise, includingabilliard r pool g SWimm�.ri r',; hall, bowling alley, boxing arena, dance , public , �Y ii pools; " w ; e °,', Auditorium, exhibition hall or other public assembly; ',. ss ( 4) ...... !` °`": --- ( ) Automobile and trailer sales sale • Automobile ��r` Autom -parts, acc ory � , ` 5 u onmobile repairs, painting and upholstery; , k' ( 7) Catering establishment; r. , '" �,,,1 ( 8)• Churches and accessory uses; Al ( 9) Cleaning establishment; ; , r,,N' (10) colleges; r (11) community buildin s (public) . � g p �, ', (12) bri reY-in business offering goods and services di. `rect1; to customers Waitingin parked motor vehicles; �� y. A. (13) indoor, outdoor and other theaters; " 4 r� , (14) reed sto , ', (15)' Governmental structures or land uses not including , schools x*. e (16) iospitals, convalescents general, home for the aged (1t) ) 41 Hotel (resident"�al 40 rF. . � 268 (Tigard 2/25/74) r , a Is "rt 'qtr "Y.r�+'a tA,. . ma, , a„ , M -.r '•, - �v �m�ntr v+. urk,��f,;+� w.*;,�,,m,:tmcri�.n'1a�yTei�,��, I"Y"rym w�m�nm^^�,.,, ^H-�r�r� z^ +;tc;M'n^ _ ." , , 1p. n :'„ ' •,1,' ... 41. i i,1 id 1T"' 2 8 . 030--18 . 28 . 060 C • ' 41. .., ,'.4,•'' k (18) Libraries; (19) Lodges, fraternal organizations; (20) Lumber yard; y. 4, (21) Museums; 44 (22) Parks and playgrounds (public) ; If (23) Pet shop; (24) Plumbing, electrical or general contractor and i , A., shop; (25) Printing shop and newspaper pUblishing; , K (26) Private club; ,4, .... , • . , •., . ..,,, 8estourqtAt' 27 Radio or T.V. service, , (28 • 28 Secondhand store; . ., (29) Taverns, cocktail lounges, bars, clubs and any , ..,/ other activity whose patronage, membership or attendance is restricted as to age, age group or other specific limitation; ...,r,. 30) Tire shop and retreading; *di)L..2.5.;,.:6c..- . - ar' c)(1 . 1) Veterinariants office or animal hospital: ".' (32) Any business, service, processing, storage or dis- play 4. play essential or incidental to any permitted use in the C-3 ,,Y1' zone and not conducted entirely within an enclosed building. t41 , , (Ord. 72-70 §2, 1972 : Ord. 70-32 §140-2 , 1970) . % t. 'o 18 . 28. 030 Lot requirements. In the C-3 zone the lot ,904 requirements shall be as follows : 5)(,)Cc) ., A v„ (1) The minimum lot area shall be cix thel,teene square feet; 100 (2) The minimum lot width shall be ciuty -4ee-€; (3) No maximum lot coverage shall be required. (Ord. 0-32 §140-3 , 1970) . 1'4 18 . 28. 040 Setback requirements. Exoelpt as may other- ;I:,:, wise be provided in Section 18 . 12 .100 , the setbacks for non- residential uses in the C-3 zone shall be as followst (1) The minimum front yard shall be ten feet, land- , 'f scalped and maintained, , 5 ee 6teo et, 1 ef,v,-, 4., (2) No side yard setback shall be required, except when 41.0 ? abutting a reSidehtial zone, a side yard of fr-i-ve feet shall 1 , be required; (3) No tear yard setback shall be required, except when abutting a residential zone, a rear yard setback oiFtwen.Ly- five feet shall be required. (Ord. 72-34 S4 / 19/2; Ord. 70- :0 -, v 325140-4 , 1970) . it 18 . 28 . 050 Etuilding heght, 8xcepas otherwise p . . ro- vided in Section 18 . 12 . 1100 no building in the C-3 zone shall „ ' exceed a height of three storieS or thirty-five feet WhiCh- 4, ...,, t ever is less. (ord. 70-32 5140-5 , 1970) . ',. 18 28 060 Additional requiretints Additional require- men.hs' applicable to the Q-3 zone include but are not limited to the . 40110wing: . (1) Off-street parking and loading, see Chapter 18 . 60; ;t4 (2) Access and egress, see Chapter 18 . 64) . ,.. c5) t, e,/ - r,,, t: k? d 4=p 1 kli 1""' a iii-1 i ett fri,.u P.,1 di r i V% r .,• , %. 269 (Tigard 2/2S/14) .' r I ,..,-. -,....,,,,,,.... .1,,,,,,,,,, ,OPOtt.49...)04,1,44,414. ,...t.t."....',..155W, , 4''i;', '� s d� rl 1,:1. 11 i1 K'/ .I'r.M1 V tti'r� , '^1 11T. n + impri, . 1 t / ,09,,,A.,..„, , ,i, ..., 1.9 riii fr`"r� ,l".. e� ifs,' 4",( >r i ) {'�', f//41:p.,.,; �14'rll!y''�r'Irtw„K1 ,R' , 1 ,ti... t f itit. •14*,,,,?,,%.,,., 1, . 11!1`'' }$,'„ , ,,{t ,{ , , • ,k.-J41' t' ell ;,i , vt . :, . t 1 M, h t+i�R. ^ �{ T 4 E r v i),,,,,„,,,,..,,,,,,e, ' 7'�IT'l'},:i V. �Jr•r y .:�1.,�F,,,,, 7,,1•tN r rJ1.Yi 1Fir',,e,.1, °irr' �'`,l // 4'.. b,Irl„Adir Or . . ' ! ' ;it'', (,, �,,,4:-�.+v-1+7,111," -+-;h;•., arp=, `'' , F y I f� d y ir k+ •' ,0/ 01..-� v ,. , .4'Wi tii • . 'r � r, IS �qp�; PPE ,f yr t.�l `� r? iss �. NSURANCE SPEED,,./2 c r �ir�"n ,,.r .. Q' I r OP,. 10P. i. . 1 1; .y r�,�., 'T�'- _ A� iM1I 4,•I,, r, 4 6 • J EMS Wil I '�+ 7i ,,.,..6 y r„II,.P -g: ,. }7r, w }. ,�, 1,rz 2 ' ., it r'_' "• 'nl'I y MILES �`— - �4 °1 • • a ! � } :w .msur. n' ��.�4,!..:,.....1 61101111 -,,"1�� ? •' ft 1' • .anew r, qtl�� ,,rr rl tI ��}V l /e-- --- FA RI 111) q • �I 11 t Al• R H.iiii• �, .- �. • �.. f�'�My/M�5] ..:..�',I VI 4.g6;•46 IratS`••••=4 .:T;-''' ' ', I u LNiF L'fI '"r "?f s.W�I,R,... 4 •. ,i I' .i .0.1;*...� .,r— :,:- .. .,�.`` III IQ .PyPA. -D .1,x"._'_1 T"'r,_ i( h ,0 ' I ray ., , a t1iEA +", Q ...` .y n �� t�+ .t yrs 1 ii ,,it.� rl rrl. 41. •'l..rl Z_• •� b •',la"AdvI n.. i 41 yy4 ....•_,40.31020#*; �} O� w e ��,rr�.,, .0.4041 1I,* l/ il,rR'r4nraftj o y' '4,rrl llirreA.,74,11belr 4.�.rY,�.,►i }t�I ' 11 A f-,1m 4V r•�Ar j b.�,�'�i""1M�y�r��Y��I`4t/` 'A � •,w• w,�•C a .+ f04- �„"/i4t''�Aa,M`,`•1 4! ,4:1i4 IAS O �1 nl 1r,4'..''' i ,i ��r�' ►r A, ,et w I ter,�V1 p t�s,,r�r.r 1/�. rf 1 •f4',]; .bld/ , J�I i ..^A,�t 1I'�jsr qlw 41Mr��t1 y �!i G 11 ri, , r r +••tj,1'R I', A'�, ,A,.. i� r Apr.. 11 y r , r /k� d4. I�1�vA�«e��f � i w�5,� (a.��wr�zq•�V .�3��ifr►,,1: +r{ t r^ �^,�'''I/►�,+�'- ��1k1� � �I~ ll�isif �1;�ril;vr7.:' i, I1/4 ;�r'��". i, t 141.; A •� ,ur+ G,4 u I i.�11 4«tyIy q1 l•1 C^ i,..,. n p, 1 4. fili f$ ~{t1\q 11'il�l� �14.:4.��+T'4 hallo'.: �l 4 ",A 0 `�r � fi _ 4*I� 1'V11-"0.141N"1: Yp 1�Yh11•A ��i ,r-ArKj/'{r;rsp ' . � u.��''ti i , i ;� 4,;i""�n 1.404Z4316411ti � �� s i�XMA�1 •��'s.,� • i.✓w__yI)•.1 h .z .r�t..9.7-0-4P72.44.'� " O ~ d'' A gy4 �`�digit Vekt 1 ' y,2.4 t..it t,r4,,,,,,,,,,,...„:„,..„. ftetf_IJ r ij, .,..vti jG y frm tt,4,1 P�e��j e�'� ict, tt1 : (k,��.l`�� ,I t }i}��j1rG. ,;i,!' J� �1{jp,a �'�,'"�1' �} q/�n•,A1/�}X 41:. �I I'c�i�l t, �� si�,�1� Qi!M r,� �.�- `yri+�.i•l�i�l'Tf.Y'711' .li.L . Q,d'141111111P1121,;�Pr � 11��••4► .•... �l r ..,� �� /�' J+ - "Faa^J.«a t L3`?' -_ , f'. ,,,,,,,15:, A iy 1 ,p,„....-.4.,„,,,,,,-,..... 1 pl t! v ,Ly,��[ 3 etyd. 44.,,__. 11= ) , '� I/ t r fy,�,',{'l r M,:j t Ff"+r°i'+,�,�y/,.a+. .r SR.;. ,reAli y _.J C 1I- a aL tY - •'44560' l�4'k gt!iu i' p�'t. A .t .- 111 kf, 1'i rt, : '. X'11. 1�A h�� 6 fs � y ;� d'/' IrA t .e Q d . y' r4',., 1 =t r ditl' l'4.11.ke 1qf.1 j,'�+s c � � . k k.1lie" '"1 1 Willi. ; tI JJ}�YJ r�_ , lY to.4,. 1 SIFy • ,' b ,) { .I�l1� �II� ' - , tik ��' •�`I }7"�''l "t - �:- F« ® i d v x,H, 41 � .* , .,^.�,. .�11i. I0 I w. q1a• 9 „.."� . , rit'i,y `• Y� 11-a.7.1,.. -�1 1. J I r "i (;�I , } i 1, t y�:1't ' /i..rr "l ,.kali • �1Ai ti Q d .) / »GE l 1*�F 1, tT' III ,1 iI t'i t ' �N t'r 1 , „;g ,r y ewl. k "t ^,:. .'i' J,r • �' 1�� ,,lar � f 4 6, t iiii, L��"'J/ «v.+ '•fie' 4 111ii j,..I .h.iii It i /�i t` I I ,." n , :i 11,x,. k , } er'. ... ""'°'.�,• `""`""v.,�,1.--•kms.. .'4 iO4 ••�d'A't,Ly 4,14YY1'', G� trt....414'444' LL . t�. ,• `W`"1y� :;: ,.w,.,, ��..` ''`'�+_, +s ��,� M�", �Z` titi ,' " . *'�1�*i4� i�1�.''�C�♦;`.J*{�Ypfs.Mr' ~, isl`t ,''�""_ 4 __ r„- W.�� i��II■ k : �'•,..11 .Y 4,,�Wir.! .„,,.:iiiifillif Ii 1t s p ..,'..'' -1,y i11 Cariyori broad at xi/thy View West ,a 119 ti V 4%...- n. , aa,:�:r w -5,.,t>f t.F1111,°+s,1,040,,,,j,:MFak ,,,ir"'p poor, I ro«^n� »vrn Yrt w. .wrl,ranL. 4i'er'H+dM<Mb 1, r "* � �<i7” t ?„, �F'*MS'.,. ;#7r .r fia}' 4`1 »•* i a I`+ r�o^n§+$R sai' r•A a y- _ ^r r r' k S' r;, If)lr Memorandum >lii ?i. To: Planning Commission ;r, From: Planning Department ,.,, Subject: Revisingthe C-3 zone k�+ Date: March i4 1975 Strip commercial development on Pacific Highwaye, L.s a cuntanuing plane- iny' of P g `--- discussion but little j p issue in tatesttu:nsuccessfudl effort to make some progress in this direction occurred last Monday night when the City Council voted �` this dire t g t r r ;' against the NPO #1 suggested C-P development on a portion of the 0'�' highway. i _ ' a It does not appear possible to change the zoning on Pacific Highway. ' Therefore, the choices are narrowed to two: ,r �5, 1, 1) Ignore this issue altogether or y ' ,,, 2) Attempt to deal with the problem by revamping the C-3 zone to '(!),''',:°,, deal With the most" serious problems s; , p second alternative is preferable to the Staff expects s that the s;.l�`{ PlanningCommission ai.d the following items are listed for the .. '�'' purpose discussing possible changes in the C-3 lone, , J 1. + traffic. g uses to be a conditional Requiring high generatin i use and establishing locational criteria. 2. Requiring a minimum length of highway frontage, lot depth ',, and lot area ,I.4 , 3. Requiring shared access points . '':, 4. Greater setback requirements (possibly 20 ft in front) ' ' 4 In addition to revising the C_3 zone to deal with the most pressing. '+ ; problems, the staff recommends that the Planning Co4,r►mission continue " j with the work of considering all. aspects of strip development t its I% 'yam".. l.y s;IiMy . .:., .'y„ 4, ,v. ,F.; .,,,, t . + l � ....,*4'. i•M�ymrrrNrr'*Mr4"a�aq!1�trmx K M4q4M14. .n i"1,' .,I+,•.qr .,[wµ4{r ,.:: r''r" «, 'v .0., '.1 t k 1..yv}�,,. 'F t' , II , F .a. 4 q y ; 0,,,,s1 C` ;l bT II °c� , 1\./„N�.r i$................. r......14a, .,c ... , R . ,,,. . 74 IIr Y.'; �t ` To the Honorable, the �City o rrlicil of the {t, it ofCambridge: . ,,k The undere4gned respectfully pray ,;. that the teat of thy:, Cambridge Zoning Ordinance be amended in the following I riVY, a y: ti,�� Section Add Paragraph 5p. ° 4,„........'...www�.rr,+.....,..,+aaW..-. ...5..1.4,.. R e , a. REQ O!hDuo. u s. Ind. Ind. W A tT r W,(��+, 13 j,,,1. y .r.,..d.l* '4 an..w + +w. +r+xN #**'4+�.Mrwr�u ».*w.++wr+fw...;. .0 ws ln+.+�.w 'it a° '. 5p. Fast Order Fond no no rto no SP SP P SP Tr.stablx$h ent lml: A ttici ° IV Section A -Ir. b4 v,s!t. , .,, y yam, II,eplaco "Drive-in resfirarant, drive-in re a" '.';:h r1entstand" with: ,, Ite ;a 1,,t a„ E klR OST, u . DUs. Int'. Ind . r Al,' y, 4, A 13 A 13 A .,” an.lwvx-�t,Ib+w fA,AYMF4Nwv W�w+s4uti�L a.x +h1/�+M*Ww4:+ir. 'lMp' Mfhr� MkNN�'. ,. T! +tm';z.+b.in'a'kW a•Wat.btia'kavY ,'Mf` Eab.. Autoznobile Oriented no no no no SP SP SP SP Food Service Feta- r,1 iM r 1t, �.: ."r f 1. .rX .NY wA:x ..f. Mr. a,,,. ! Article I tf °t $ In Ort the following cel", it ions in the p rope v alphabetical betical rd r: : T° >a, A .1tot i,� : ientr" :; icier' ti rvt ' ernt;l.abL:tth n tAt A loo, . r e vice s ,�� `sY,.� +MMW=Vh�T�Li.IR'sRt:NMM>wN%�Y2�Mu`-bMYtt.H�.44"+��Aa'1#��¢uat+Y.u3Y..,M.tlN.s'._vlkSNss%sFAtYNItiM#.s Y.futl_SJW 1Fi.�•W1�di1�pW�41kb51�+C:rtM+'RfrgV:SW`•Kims+.J t4Rfilsa,ta�IM1Ni11'.Ain ... t ee'r*t bllrlhniezit which providel ii,'., zr „Ater, nit/ 'the lc of parking ; pac e t, than is required by tl,e 'Zoning ) °: ce. 'ta,st o der 1'c2 � . 1'ood which. '10 (�.�1 pr ni :pity- intended.de fey it°1»j ° . wTMr.wvMYY-Aw+»+u4�.+rlr?lMe+.:nw.sa:>GINr's.+M.A:.aur:radwuw A yl x edict consut° of. n 1*at'ge r than for 'use iu ingredient in component off" 1,-Ilea' : (b) available upon a short waiting time. and .,:i r 1 , ( ) packaged or pro ented in such a manner that if can he adil i. eaten outside . the prc'n7 nes v, . s h rc it sold. it 1. ° C .$a x: + fa.Awa,7--u,F.i,,,,,-.'rxiawaww;iu u w 1 Ir e ...°:.:.�srul°..�.iw,a..r° . i_TM'I�^ane,.r,e�' sw '..—,4,,,..........4.,:,,..,, , +V � . . i�4'. �r . r Y ,.. ,:,,,--1,.,,;..„,.' s�'.�":.W M,,,: a ... i 1{{1 ,f1,?. r lain _ .....�� ,...,_.:__ ...._. .. �..,_,._.,. ._c. .. :,._. .. ,.,... ___. ,,. . .,.� ,,.. ...,� ,___...:,...._.,__4;.,._.�..:...... .__,_._.,..,..,_.. ..__.... ._._..�.. ._.......,..__ .__ �. .. _,. 0.11' .1 '1',4',"' • i}a a ad4y rr try it f ; east cider food, ' esteb1ishrnent An establishment whose primary ,, i fay bUSin0s$ 1$ the sale of fast order food for consumption on o off '. the premises. rj 0;r atw m/;« N air 1. ..1. .dM f+ e o ,I r },' — A rt; c1.e ' Section MMWMIww.,p�gwpMa+rN,"I,rM1iMI ,111 } I' r}f;,' Add Paragraph 5; +,;; b in considering der Special Permits for art Order Food Esta- t: p b1ish nts and Automobile oriented Food Service Establish. r„ h,,t ents, the, Board of Zoning Agape ils shall. give c gas derationq �a {` x in addition to the above requi nm ent , to tae fol.owing ,;,r. 7 app q on y3.g♦/ 1 �y/giY n yyy� Yi Yj« ` ) lr 1.)1� ia' : tIA a.4«r,M�I and parte .AAG'. :t;4, l The w��qq� ,Y� of p.y r�.�1p+y y y y+y 1 `.p, uses in the ry.y,�y�y �*y yy��+� ,�+.�,�.� Mild (h) T e a,xiste,n e. o1#her L,,,iR.rill,.Ar uses in sa+II.,ne service Vice 4 x t x d1 1y '',s, '''4:11:1' 1}r r(c) e nsittvity' to the v'ikitial and physical c t ract 'ri 'rtic of , };t';1he particular 1ocr.#.tio nA j'R�! =�, (d) Irtlifill4:rl 'xit of use d. i i the neighborhood or in the City. :; a,y iu 4. y., y p i qyi y �y ` �p� trade r to }y#y icy ryµy yy iy r y�, (e) /°M1el,f,aJA. a woAA, G�1 dk-7Sn trade f: opposed drF Y 1+*in 4✓r , 11r}y : x .1lC,',1 i toinohy leVe1aito trade„ F1 1/f; • r 1. { 1,. a#r. 1.. .#« aY,# «1 4. 1 1, f e pea;9 ntly 13U1 M1x ttea o r tile a t-u b r i g Planning Boar d M K '1 i "1 / _Hill„,,,,) 1 �µ i 1 p y yW It)fi. ,A rto}tSI r .N( , `..lmi,IASxr44T 1,!i Clitairrt a 14: K. ii t ,, sa,#W"IF>'0., L?' 4 1( - .r . ,r :.,q , r,, µu f;,,,,+.i,... ,,,, ,, .4-'wauvu'' { it 's' f ... ^•,r..} i...x �,..,. ...,, r:.. r.v,. ,r,'.,:r,r. ,. ..,.... J t tY"44 lby• 4m �/ sN �iJ, .,,.,. .. �,.. MM w ry n a.w e .,i -.. ,4,01-444,1,001-q7,-1,'Nnr!1rt 1«�b4A ,.A?r .,',..,r...4.1•n+r9M.k;a'!#'•u .t, r �! , -�f, �.+550.'kA, ga7r,.,i!Mr{:yrtrrArF 11 a.1$o�t111'M . _ ..,�--?.., �"X.-... . 'x ,, ,,,..'1,q'�',...fiWa3+1'r+rhlyyk,,ti4?'r�ak+''i'nV ''i�r�M,k4`.9Mp;Wx?�M"ry;e'.k�w2"!fiu'""' +r'� .�'. ,x�,. , .:@� • xyi f. 4 t, �'.d'. , ay r I: JI. h r, $ 1 r;, 1r 4.,',..,,,:..i. • t 4 Ow , f rr1 r, , . ; L �' , qb; ,1 r, ',,, ey.3 Ili' • 0 r '? .. .fit t`! 1' ,..„.4 L4„,, 1, ..,. , r; 1 $} y,t. it II,I.)`' i eI In1 k: i r f t°{.r', ! • y��i;I k ''.ill :)i„„,,. , f t •;i ,r YSt 4d 44.4'44.41. 144. %1 1 4' Y1 E . '' Is 1 kilD , 0 0 Iti4'.11(<4\1 ..'.1,‘„,•: ^,: 1Y' Kr, • int ys, F t:„ ',Vt.'4.' * 0, .. 0. • 4. • ..t +li.1t Q it 'y. c!` ';ti F .'1'114 '.*.4 •. ,-:,r''''''',",rt.”.^�, .'v.1+r!t'td,l@."}zVw„InrSk». !G,rc,'°d�M,1ktn,w,A,�..,'r.S �,�1 rn..,1,5 ^,,,grw,.”wFu,.s 7,•••.•4,14 aMmm ,•••r::::.:,•^7 f^"1nu, .•,4x.u.,,•.4 '� tthw rWim"S�"�'!•,§,`s� • tf'"",�";t"'"y�f i �tl , � ,,^1"..+..^^".','.!'"I S `, .,r'',l E r' `„N NPO Plan Policies r o Businesses• on Pacificfi .,, Highway should be oriented to the ;' exista,ng traffic and not draw additional traffic from the t{,�' iadjacent community. Convenience or neighborhood centers ,i`,, prohibitedfromlocating should therefore be on Pacific y • E, Highway. .� , ,,,p, OBJECTIVE ,lY, Place commercial-professional uses in locations specified , ,, by y•4 ' most appropriate for their use the NPO Plans. ,,. ;.y.,:. :i .ti! ilk Pry 1' yid, I fit y 7 ri ',,',1 4 wel ' ry, 1I .; Yet.,,. 'l' 11 1 :''''.1 ?a' tV M. 'A; t. ;.., +r+,ramsv r_ aYt>7aru.,nw-.atmnr uta p.,.{.x.rv,ra,rGlhr.ant „nx rd,+l:wtkivmFrc<,+-ami,wrrmax,,imw«.ry•r^u„.„,,r:.N^v»r«, ryw,« {*"Fpt�Mrn ert^v°+„c"np00✓q .uF0,,,M,,,,An,».„ ,,VI mwus.'y^rnrWt.:lr°'"'^.:. ,.,. ;' ...., `.4 :.": •-'+ 1,{;-, r av+,. rv.f • I . -,,, mined by the market eche economic forces that commercial enter- prise nterprise bends to. So on the one hand we have the notion of how we would like the community to be and.. on the other hand we have the realm of possibility. It seems that the proper tempering of these two basic notions is fundamental to realistically planning this community. Considerable academic work has been done on commercial land use and its relationship to the community. Brian Berry who first started his research on commercial structure in Seattle in, the early .50's, is probably 'pre. eminant in the field. Mr. Berry's landmark research and corroborating study from many others confirms a basic "hierarchy" of commercial enterprise in which several "levels" of commercial. activity may be identified. Generally these are broken down into "place" activities which tend to cluster for mutual support and "non--place" activities which do not need nearby supporting or function- ally similar activities. A third category shares elements of each of ' the other two but has particular location requirements peculiar to its specialized nature. These activities are those specialized groups of activities that are strongly related to each other but not to J . other kinds of enterprise; for instance, automotive related activities and medical and para--medical and dental facilities. 2. Tigard has developed with little clear definition or distinction given these functionally different commercial enterprises, but has rather lumped all of them together in a kind of "garbage can" zone (C-3). In this zone we have attempted to answer the locational needs of many very different kinds of business with the result that many enterprises s , could not survive the commercial environment provided them Others have elected not to locate here recognizing that Tigard offers them no really appropriate locations. 3. The difficulties intrinsic to constrainingall to SW commercepacific ) ? Highway, both for the businesses really appropriate on the highway and for those Which cannot survive there have been pointed out in the 'Tigard Community Plan and by a more recent study of Pacific Hwy. dona for the City of Tigard by a student intern. It is apparent from these previous studies as well as from the present planning acti.vit'y On the highway that re-thinking 'Ti gard's commercial structure ..: w;p+..,x..,.y ,g.p„wnry wrrt. ,v,p..wbYn,w.nv.«,:,n.a,..«...,.:,:.w.W...,,.,,.,y.,,:». ,,.,,«...p..wswr.yyw..ewp.«,.•n.+wwn�,.i pM.},wrr.t,Mrtrtl,rhSry rswuYeLtu'lidad+u+F,w'.,w,rk.x4`e'^K:«w�PaM • 1� needed. 4. To this end, :several objectives for the revision of the current zoning code with respect to commercial' activity and to Pacific Hwy., have been developed 5. The conclusions of F. W. Boal and. D. B. Johnson in their 1965 paper Printed in Canadian Vie© ra hear (Vol. 9, No. 3, 1965, pp 154 . • are particularly appropo s to Pacific Highway: +'Clearly., commercial ribbons perform ,vital functions in the retail and service structure of urban areas Planning should concentrate less on abolishing this type of linear commercial development .and more on ameliorating its obvious disadvantages (1) by trying to prevent the entry of an excessive number of establishments (Principally by cutting down on the vast, areas of 'highway commercial zoning' ) (2) by trying to achieve better design of individual establishments in terms of both visual • G characteristics and accessibility; and (3) by improving the over- all design of the ribbons themselves." Design factors can make or break commercial districts* particularly . Paoiiic Hwy. which serves both highway oriented commercial and the x typical arterial (strip) commercial functions. Staff has addressed . �; those i'actors in these proposed ordinance re'ysian.s as well as addressing the land use conflicts apparent in the code. 7. It is staff's opinion that the proposed increases in site site, set- backs and landscaping, and the proposed changes in permissable uses are the minimum Changes necessary to accomplish the desired aims. 1 .lwYrnr+.tnp.wwNwria..�o.scYv<n NYw....X..?Mr.«ryi-M1-0+rN aYrb.Y1'w•r.h'r.+oe M•'"'+•"h-r+-e� r nYa..+a-.....r.ww..wwn.M.M`TRt?"M1FMTi4'Mt'0.1hM�lt'}:{I}{(GyYAAC.�A6CP3"u'.:2'rNC J.4 I.i.Yqx.+.lyuij4, • CHAPTER 1-8--.--28,--GENE RAL COMMERCIAL ZONE (C--3) ' \ ,,,i Sections: h t 18.28.010 Permitted Uses 18.28.02.0 Conditional Uses 18.28.030 Lot Requirements 18.28.040 Setback Requirements 18.28.050 Building Height 18.28.060 Additional Requirements g 18.28.010 Permitted Uses. Nd buildn structuresor land shall be used and no building or structure shall hereafter be erected, en- larged or altered in. the 0-3 zone except for the following uses: (1 Appl.tance parts; 2 Appliance store (performing incidental repairs only) ; 3 Automobile parts, accessory ccessory sales; 4 Bank, loan company or other financial institution; '' 5 Blueprinting photostating or other reproduction process; 6 Business machines, retail sales and service; 7 Furniture store; 8 Film distribution center; 9 Frozen food locker (family use only) ; (10 Hotels; 11 Instruments, scientific or professional (repair shop) 12 Motel; •~ 13 Newsstand; 14 Radio or T.V. Service (Ord. 72-70, Sl 1972; Ord. 70-32, 8140-1, 1970) ; 15 Real estate office; 16 Sporting goods store 18.28.020 Conditional Uses. In the C-3 zone the. following uses and their accessory uses may be permitted as conditional uses when in. accordance with Chapters 18.72 and 18.84: (1) Any conditional or permitted use in a C-4 zone excepting i mobile home parks; (2) Amusement enter porisexn� arena,dldan.�eld or pool hall, 2 A bowling alley, b g hall, public swimming E • pools; b 3 Appliance repair 1 4pp " � exhibition hall or other public assembly; 5 Auditorium, `boat and trailer Sales 5 Automate �. � 6 Automobile and boat repairs, painting and upholstery; 7 Catering establishment; 8 Churches and accessory uses; 9 Cleaning establishment; (10 Colleges; (11 ` Commercial schools such as business colleges, music con- . j servatores and trade schools; (12) Community buildings (public) ; 1. 18.28.020 - 18.28.040F a r"v"" (13) Drive-in business offering goods and services directly to customers waiting in parked motor vehicles; 14 Indoor, outdoor and other theatres; 15 Feed stores: 1.6 Governmental structures or land use not including schools; 17 Hospitals, convalescent, general, home for the aged; (18 Hotel (residential) ; 19 Libraries•, 20 Lodges, fraternal organizational; 21 Lumber yard; 22 Medical-dental clinic; ' 23 Motorcycle and accessory sales and service; 24 Museums; 25 Parks and playgrounds (public) ; 26 Pet shop; 27 Plumbing, electrical or general contractor and shop; 28) Printing shop and newspaper publishing; 9) Private club; 30 Professional or commercial office building; (31) Restaurants (Ord. 72-70, S2, 1972; Ord. 70-32, 5140-2, 1970) ; (32) Secondhand store; ( 33) Taverns, cocktail lounges, bars, clubs and any other activity whose patronage, membership or attendance is restricted as to age, age group or other specific limitation; 34 Tire shop; 35 Veterinarian's office or animal hospital; 36 Any business, , processing, storage or display Anyservice r essential or incidental to any permitted use in the C--3 zone and not conducted entirely within an enclosed building (Ord. 72--70, S2, 1972; Ord. 70-32 S140-2, 1970) . .r 18.28.030 Lot .Re c uirements In the C-3 zone the lot requirements ordinance onMay follows: lots created prior to the enactment of this shallybe as12, 1975, and being less than the minimum required shall be considered legal and conforming to the requirements of this title) ; 1 The minimum lot area shall be 30,000 sq. ft. 2 The mini mum lot width shall be 150 ft. 3, No maximum lot coverage shall be required. (Ord. 70-32 5140--31970) r . 18.28.040 ►Setback ,Requirements. Except as may otherwise be provided in Section 18.12.100) the setbacks for non-residential uses in the C-3 zone shall be as follows: (1) The minimum front yard shall be ten feet, landscaped and maintained (see general provisions 18.12.100) , Shall. be required) except , b a residential zone a sideyard of► g d when abutting 2 No side yard setback Shall be re � 10 ft, shall be required; (3) No rear yard setback shall e ne. aired, except when abutting . a residential zone; a rear yard setback of twenty-five feet ,. shall be required, (Ord, 72-34 84, 1972; Ord, 70-32 5140-4) 1970) . 18.28.050 18.32.010 a � 18.28.050 Building Height. Except as otherwise provided in Section 18.12.110, no building in the C-3 zone shall exceed a height of three stories or thirty-five feet, whichever is less. (Ord. 70-32 S140-5, 1970) . 18.28. 060 Additional �tec�uirements. Additional requirements applicable to the C-3 zone include, but are not limited to, the following: (1 ' Off-street parking and loading, see Chapter 18.6(.> (2 Access and , see egress, Chapter 18.64; g p (3 Landscaping a minimum of 15% of the total lot area shall be landscaped; in addition, see Chapters 18.58, Site Development Plan and 18.59, Architectural Design Review; 4) Enclosure and screening required, see Section 18.12.080; 5 Nuisances prohibited, see Section 18.12.070 (Ord. 71-4 S7 (part) , 1971; Ord. 70-32 S140-6, 1970) . CHAPTER 18.32, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE (C-4) Sections: 18.32.010 Permitted Uses 18.32.020 Conditional Uses 18.32.030 Lot Requirements 18.32.040 Setback Requirements 18.32.050 Building Heights 18.32.060 Additional Requirements 18.32..010 Permitted Uses. No building, structure or land shall be Used and no building or sstructure. shall be hereafter erected; enlarged or altered in the C-4 zone except for the following uses : (1) Bakery , panymanufacture of•goods is limited to �'� provided goods retailed on the premises only, 2 Barbershop; 3 Beauty parlor; 4 Collection station for dry cleaning or laundry; Delicatessen store; 6 Department store; fount 7 Drugstore or pharmacy including incidental fountain service but not including any other use unless specifically per- mitted under this chapter; y ' Florist or flower shop; (9 Gift shop; 10 Grocery store; 11 Hardware store;' 12 Jewelry store; 13 Laundromat; 14 Meat market; 15 Record shop; 16 Shoe repair 17 Stationery and `book stores open to persons of all ages ithout . atrons.ge rest��.ct�ons, _ . ,w, Tailor shop dress shop) clothing store,p tore; other similar p 18 . � � � p, service or retail use, if approved by the Planning Com- mission) and subject to the same conditions; (19) Variety store (Ord. 72-70 S3) 1;972; Ord, 70--32 SI%OL1.:, 1970) t*ewm•......" ... ltt *+s+szrNrrrv+intNtxmYmcrhitturtKou*gvnlrr,uti+'., ., ., .... ,. ... m�xlern+nW+.rJr+wwmv'sl.ntw,!»WmrwMYl.•Avu w,.Mr N+.++MMry br'0",lwn..tl,rrr..• ..,.x ....•.. ..... ,wa:ui+ wl.w+ryrk�q! 1 wi.Mryyyi'k. . a 18.32.020 18.32.060 18 32.020 Conditional Uses. In the C-4 zone the following uses and their accessory uses are permitted as conditional uses when in accord- ance with Chapters 18.72 and 18.84: 1 Conditional use as permitted in an A-2 zone; 2 Garden supply store; 3 Home occupations" (4) Multi-family dwelling subject to the regulations of an A-2 zone;, (5) Public utility; 6 Restaurants; 7 Service stations • (incidental repairs only) , 8 Any business service, processing, storage or display essential or incidental to any permitted use in the C-4 zone and not conducted entirely within an enclosed building; • (9) Doctor or dentist and professional or commercial office. (Ord. 70-32 S150-2, 1970) . 18.3 2.030 O30 Lot Requirements. In the 0-4 zone the lot requirements shall'be as follows 1 The minimum lot area shall be six thousand sq. ft. ; 2 The minimum lot width shall be sixty feet; 3 The maximum lot coverage shall be sixty percent. (Ord. 70-32 Sl50--3 1970) . 18.32.040 Setback Requirements. Except as may otherwise be provided in Section 18.12.100, the setbacks for non-residential uses in the C-4 zone shall be as follows: yard The front and setbacks shall be twenty feet, • 2 1Nto side yard setback shall be required, except when abutting a residential zone; a side yard setback of five feet shall be required; (3) No rear yard setback shall be required, except when abutting a residential zone, a rear yard setback of twenty-five feet shall be required. (Ord. 70-32 81 0--4, 1970) . 3 otherwise provided in. Section 18_. 2..030: Euildi�� Height. �xoept as 18 l2. no building in the C=4 Zone shall exced a height of three stories or thirty-five feet whicheveris less. Ord. -� � 1970) . t � 70 32 s150 3 32 060. Additionalfeguirements. Additional requirements applicable to th6.-U74 zone include, but are not limited to, the following. 1 Ofd'- street parking and loading; see Chapter 18.60; 2 Access and egress; see Chapter 18.64; 3 tnclosure rreening required, see Section 18,12.089; 4 Signs, ad and screening `g advertising signs and sign structures shall be subject conditions) limitations, prohibitions and lairre uirementshofcTitle 16) to which particular reference q � p is made; y a s 5) Landscapingminimum of 15,E of the total lot area shall _,. . t FA �. 1840326060 q.. landscaped; in additionsee Chapters 18.58, Site D 6_ Nevelopment Plan and 18,59, Architectural Desi( ) uisanpces rohibitedse Strviewrd. 71-4 7 (Part) , 1971; Ord. 70--32 5150-�6, 1970) o,f • • • • • F •kwTM'.NµF.I..w;rn.M M1wrr:N xhr�.�41hM�ncn1,J4+rV y„TvG.rv�.tlrwaw. .ra,F.iw....�. ..-.,w w w.a».y.e...m...0.a_.wrhM»+w,...YF^ �M9 1 NPiMrR 1 sF[YrllSei.Y.lf ArARM1T.lhL�m+frJ'J'�111qu.bVwJLWs F,1.,J • .r'. ,••'..• p 'l M r�...wv17. xr1�raw } "H �'�� M _ • 18a12•l30 .CTS estrictiola 4Vithin15 } r 0 Feet of an k�lementer or JuniorHigh•• School. (a) For 4 di stance of 750 feet, measured in all directions from an elementary or ,junior high school, high traffic generating, uses shall be Oex4conal-i8CJi•a4--edertahF`" lR+^SCILSJTF7/1n�iZCiCL�vv�'�m�GG -,?®j rrf g . -r�etwa�'tk�r�at�te�t�ae�sa�et�-ef�e�ude�.te-attenr��.�--�h��eub�ee sehee a - r suits- prohibited' (b) Righ traffic generators subject to the px ovsioh.s of this section aro defined as any land use w hich has a to-tal volu.me f4P-a l dr1�e1,14ye in Excess of 1,59 (50) tvlp_en4e (users) per any hour (50 in and0 out whol4- 5 scheoX-.el41,ld0on�aPe�-prasent..i.-- Uses generally found within this category • are; 1 e drive-yin facilities for banks 2 Shopping centers -moa.'e units 3apartment complexes of 300 or offices having more than .5000o0 square feet of gross leasable floor area :�. restaurants (fast food services) (c) Any land use choosing to locate within 750 feet of an �, oIemen ary or junior high school shall, make application aeo 4.yng to �3`� � ?'- '," ► �.. kE 8 a - k � tN �3 the Planning Director f t146o- tka a-t4s6 ' ay-1s-210f 11400-a0 a-h g 1- :Jai PI8 g ovate �1?1,1 010:A - e- 6 9tal 410.114 s a e b of tk�ie�sr�et ;en;�- • in the course of con.siderthg an application, the Planning Commission may require the applicant to submit information concerning the traffic generation potential of T virting access and egress and other a used u.Ee, Methods of ro perrtinent information which the planning Commission mayfind necessary in order to properly evaluate the pending application, •• pp : . :... . r ...«i..h.k+* a .«t«.a+.,.:. n ..., ..-.a w:.,y uwuJrq..trwf.rrm,wnnAwea°+tixl`;Ju'F+-AuaWm«.r •.ur'w+.:.wn�,..,.ya,';yfW. - tUTBR3 1...... T. .„ — cI ? . . . 1 OT "' .� �„ + ^'��"^.Tr.rrr!i"µ'1^y"'r'4••��ebc�{.�h' T �. !r _ r i .w�2l-�oras U L.L. l" rw iia2-1 QI. v\e oQ A Lo ,t1'[r ! w A nc u u " 85 ' , i f. ,..,.r�r�.....�.A...�.�. �.a.n....... .�.� ._�.�..,.�,_ Gi5' .. F-f..bui 1 � c., whLrUU i PL) 80 1�1ei� 1 Zf C ' 65 • 301-1 +SC Nl I I ' ' . ra-c ti �3 -te10 s !464LL 1 o (_1 fi�l r,, 1 iU ' 4 P t'•A ii--.1--..L 1., : ,,,. . , 1'J ; `Ia ( r i. 1�. 1Iyr'' k+ .�� _• M�it , it t ryawr ...nt,. i•N.+.wx5 .,.«.a ,+.,.nw«,..s s.wr.,..wah .w•Ap? 11°nt�1.JIN=s�"'�:Mii`AJg7%iNtl..Y.�P�rw�u++i"�++1'�4r�+W+a1�' -. a,�4,.gm�.wfK*.w. ,'r uilw lub.'YN+Mh`rvt.I..Jwn'kkFvt uy.. ...,�, ..;,. ... ..,..,.. ii,..-. rY i I r -a+ui ...,.,�.�..•.••..�.n.w+wrr,.w-�. . tWRwti�Mkr.- m'T 'x.L,' ...�,.