ZC2-84 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
fib F∎V a?t4tJ p :S „.;....' tr.�`r.",:.).t.l / li.'.;.I,°.uti+'r:+�xy,...,,,a;.r �, ,,+ r N
in4 r,Nr'rr4t1+4�Y,4rylt aa,lJ$
`!„,rtrY �.• 4t. .. �. , ...M- ai..»,.r...,,....... ..,.-.......... ... ..« .....,.. .r ........ .. .......... ....m... ..... N2x,,j,! ,,1.$'•
n4� f. . .,.ta •,, A!'::'" r<4 ,,ri.,rRr` .,,f,, :tp, f,;. l.... _- 1. •,,,,f,,,,.--.,-,--„, l 1 + +f!1
,h a+i` s`,, .yi1. r,.1 4 .«1`.'iJ�n t;;,"•Yt17,1.t+rh� ..:',.t1;;.,rtfn�A!^>v ".r',,$•.�,4 t4,r` r 4 y,.;C �.,`.4:t F'ti ,.';'S
4'r t l V,�:
't; C{DLONS CREEK/Tita:n Properties ', ,r"4`
,..'%',;k3,• 45 p,�.t
r Sep files P,D 2�--8 `S 11,7 83 ZC 2 84 "`
V
!, '4k & U 6. „ a +J
r!1'��.G44 fti. ........;,.:.f .-.::a..._la �.___' *-.s_-....,. 1. ..._.v. -.,>+.._ _._., _...... , .. .. .. ..... _. - _....: «.«.-..=..r•+•-n.n�.w.,«......•-4..:..:...,...,.•..+..,.:c.-._.............n^M+�° �' `Y••
zarr y 1:
1 %
r;
..t
;
L. 4t G
ff :`
'}',,,.1,..,,,,
,,..,1'.,11,'','.
33 #tr`,
:L.I Jl,
1
,.h ty4,,1, l
rt4,l;;a'4t
t a::
q ye}'
H,, d4. fir,"
:nay
45.1 ft•. ..
71Jiv1 a ,
`z{rt;
e.i1t, )i,'
w
sf� d,
4.1:
#',,,,(,",',,,,,#'1.1;p,
t11T,�t'I,
sv
N i'^N,
',..,■7■.p
tar1 „tp
,he�%r,r
! % a
i}y1",,,',.
�, {1,�i
1j{,<' /'
;'� t' a'.'
:0',11';,,,11':,S } ".t
;s4 1 ''`
I: ..iy
y°4
Ida& *. "11",
f+y(i,f, a
Jdd :.
t,rr
l ft
r
:�
l
tz.
,,
• ,i y r
A 1:,,ry l s G�
i
t
jCk^ft,i
M
} f,y
'',',:5,',.-e:,•:,:
t °f N,,1 liy,
yr
r.0,4''. .r�
j
Jr
h1 f,
Y
: . w• .: , ! ; u . . . • a I „.. 4,y 51
.'? F.I 'ft t 'A,
c1l21' y■rf.■1,/;;1y1t+r�+.f d i.`.,.T•y,^iy.1.,.yt.a.,r d y.t.t.�d „I,.,b.,'+✓+!'•6 ,y „rr5 ,,, f�'A. -M A,,X;! ;a,x 1 /:...•f Pr,f y pJdy,i c/i» 7,w s �'.,7n / L��M' /,Iy P�, { Fr�`x r/ �^ 1'S 1'.',W�,�,r A."y':k,i 1 r,'�sr +'7,1 a� x��T'r /w t R:�1A ,n�k,�.j r f1 .rN Y',.r',''„a•,rf}�r y
ii,i,i!t t;.ir ral} C,v,t,i r. r 1•t1,C:"Y*" Y t4„k....',:1Ysd:fl ,k'e,42 t,,�v>.,.``,, s:4r i , r:9,1 ,,y
t r !'C/,''1.7}:,, a ” xv\ r.,.. g,U,{1:' ,,,, x:,PJ f,=',,,,,t 1.1 :,,∎,:,>ha'#4�e)e7�u `i 71! y rr ',b#t i�.._l-t F. ,«5..�,�{ tr,,!w,#s�r ,,..:1,..,;,,.,
,.;.y!7+
ii'i� t
r,A
.',A4.,r$„r,,,
yd ls
t itil”0n
',,v,,.,,,,.+xi.' /,.',1:.
}.‘Y I kilt t�
'V:: rr. i x
Yt:;',4, - r�lev
rt a sr, Yr ,,S.t.
c ill;
�`"�
CITY OF TIGARD �Y���
, it,,,,,,
F'tr $?, Washington County, Oregon y +;=
�'xn�: 7Y��•'t4
iC; ;{ NOTICE OP FINAL DECISION BY PLANNING COMMISSION 4:rt
`ik F? 1. Concerning Case Number(s): 7C 2-84 PD 2-x83 S 11-83 1.8'3 V o o k '"`
t f
r7{s`r It
#, it 2. Name of Owner: `
Titan Prolerties ''
';.'',,',fr. 3 Name of Applicant: ,
Titan Pro ernes ` i"
,iii,o', Address 2201 NE Cornell Road City Hi;,lsboro§tateor Zip.27 123 t1.4•
,,
t,.
o't{f't 4. Location of Property; }y;",1
u.
1,.4':'V' Address East of SW Hal]. Blvd. & west of SW Fanno Creek Drives 1�jj'
b1 ,
,Yi..
if .,) Legal Description 2S 1 12BB, Tait Lots 100 101 3400 3601 .3700 & 4300) 't'
r'`'r' S Nature of Application:For a gone ch ange from R-12 to R--12 PD for a 2.49 acre parcel, 7;,'
}.-'ti'.. (2S1 12BB 3700). For conceptual & detailed 'Ian approval of a planYted development for
`d'4' all phases Preliminar y plat ap roval of a 67 lot subdvi,sion single family detached. `
1 unfits Phases II & III- And a variance to allow zero lot line in an R-12 zone. & reduce +''
``' r�,! 6. Action: Approval as requested the front yard setback, from 20 to 18 f ;Yra±
"�,,a XX_ Approval with conditions per staff report & Planning Commission ;''
,Y,
Pp p P 8 Y:
' r;a
+ Dental minutes.
,,. 7 t Noti e� was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall 's
Y.
,N:��7I,y Notice: i Y '
7
s#x, ,.
' ` and nd mailed i t ed t o: ,.
t�r ,yt
^n 4
r
Y,r4xA{ XX The applicant & owners t;�,
XX Owners of record within the required distance �''
r° �c 1x n+ affected Neighborhood Planning Organization A` � XX Affected go governmental agencies `;
,s'
rf a iig Y,4Ati 8. H iral Dec is ron: ,,,4, ..,
°rY,''` March 12, 1984 tJNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILEb» �'`
'1:0i t THS DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON t,I
kJ''�tt aF� ,..mss t•.
1 tih
The adopted ted findin
,a;tixY,�) rh findings of fact decision) � ,. y',
p g � and statement of condition can be �I
.:1,... , obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Mall, 12755 :SW Ash, l',`;
„';b,,,, P.O. Bo t 23397) Tigard, Oregon 97223. a,..,
%,
bK,, 9. A l: ;,,
}
' ,',Yr y party 'o the , appeal Y Y r Y ■ ;'F
x �,, Ate art to the +�,ec�.sion may pp . this decision in accoz'datloe with '�
F
t; ii 18.32.290(A) and Sectiotii 1832,370 which provides that a written appeal ' ','
��ti may Y Y r ..
r,„ ay be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent h
Fr.
kt
`t ; deadline for lir► Of an appeal � areh 12� 19$4 ;y'<
Y The h,N
xf. ,V ..+.: ,. .._,. .,.,.. ._.. iN ,,',!,'0'fit.■
ttry Mrt
1/4!';1 10. ue�tior��: If you have any. questions; phase Cali the City of 'lxgard ,�
„
P� ' Planning Department) 6394171 "
o
a,,,t,
V'{, ,'• yr%
S ,
Yr
■,,,, ,^, & t''''') .,4,, .2 43 P'l ''
A t /
ilf# Ail'
w
ft ,1ei tfide. 'President) Tigard ?lantlilig Comrrjssxrh DATE APPRO ED
qt
'sY X71 is 4k•'o�'t' .,,.„, .._.,, ... ;,:,:.., ...... ......:..... .. ...... .a r � `.,
f� ..:. yix i..n +. 1 i r..,.. ..-., 4'.t.';'''''. .. ,...,r .. � „.. '..,.
,....:i 1?'1� v ,. , '''''..q r F.c
.%i
.; , ! , ,.. ,,,. r.,.L 3 ,,.. x t.,. r '77:'''.77.' `F+DIY � , +!+7..,+*�..�°.. i :;;;,,w:...d i ,.
,. •k,,,..,e#.e. « a Yn...s 1.... r,..Y -s4., . ::.1 9 h `!”! ,, .:.s�«..7 , , x ,rT. .yr ,..J.: J, , . + .h
,±) ,):r �A.h � ,.,,,, � :�'{r , ,,h ,, �, ,„ y,MY: m r. :.... r.i, yp.� r Y ., J 4Y ', a ? U•`^fd o ,e s •7. (,,, , r,.' 4 «ii ,
t , -,•lY r� +{ f � � . k'�,t1 Y q �, + � Y 7 .f s If 3,: ry e Ii�
. . r af'. + 1 ,+w it .4 k,7 � +' 1 "r} ,•SI 1 �9 J ,Y
.r �d , ".i 1 v x M ,M1 Y'7, PyS n . , t x I i t r ,r
w. .�' .. ., 1 J tx ,, r; �. a'+ �F �-�;,s kb :sd lx.,h r#,�,�,,f;¢ i�,!'�tl ¢,F,�.bM`
4 t„}Y J....*:..a,.: 1.�. n.13t Yi,f.,:11:, , '.. r.;qn t\.,,..,4‘,`,7,,,3 ut 1 '� l
''...v i ,. r,..r.1 k.f+i:.,:.,i 1\�,.P f 0.,''rSC ,P,'N,� d• Jw,4 ♦1 ,) 4
}x Ila e' .�... . . ,...,, r.•,i-., .rA«,f;.l!2 ft.., }J.y� t tiy,■ F.,e� I fA (..1 r 7.i?�t to tr� .�\.
Y.,... Y<. 11�o- t: i e ,y
E{,t4r _. . e� 1,o...,.r ;,,.,.t r1,.lt.t t4•xie �t� r
lif,`tk`t}f ty�{<tai
EtI I I
y }
r�l4: If-'4
�0,?il,f,
aS
St t I'
4 it
tai y•I *t.
{a; 1 �. ,.y,
I
}t i7�r i:"0;11,;ai I
iprQ1 i ''',,4
',I' 5.3 ZONE CHANGE ZC 2-84, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PD 2-83, SUBDIVISION S ■ x�,y1 ;
, 11-83, VARIANCE V 6-83, Colony Creek Estates It, III, IV NPO # 5 f<< ;,
1 t
f\,�{Y; �Inrr
y A request for a zone change from R-12 to R-12 PD Planned Development ,,,
it;�
4,4 for a 2.49 acre parcel (2S1 I2BB, 3700). For conceptual and detailed ,,,,,r
V° plan wt approval of Planned Development phases. ror
',/E` preliminary plat approalof a 67lotsubdivision, sin gle famil y �'''!f
,,
detached units (Phase 11 & III) . Also for a variance to allow zero '
#i ry lot line construction in a R-12 zone (detached units), and to reduce ';�',
t
the front yard setbacks, l.�e. , distance between the property line and >','
kb,‘„, the front of the garage from 20 feet to 18 feet. F
.47�,,, o Associate Planner Liden made staff s recommendation for denial of the I',e
tl,,
re . f a r I rt�!r
!'i variance and approval of the Zone with a ZC •2-84 Planned Development 'lr,��,'j
tii;n� FP g � Y'��.
';;'k; PD 2-83, and Subdivision S 11-83 with conditions. ;1rs
'T,, o NPO/CCI COMMENTS Debra Naubert, NPO # 5 Chairperson V.
° - , rperson stated the 1 X,`�,
��ti'J NPO had review this application carefully. They opposed approval of ;Y.,
J ti, x
+,,, the variance for the 'reduction in front yard setbacks. They had +f`
� �• concern for the structures. They felt the single oversize garages
r; = would increase with problem of cars parking on the•streets,. They were i.4.
Mt1 also concern with that the density might be to high for the area as ( ;'{fi'
.1,:, well as the cost of the homes may have a impact on the surrounding ;t
��°d', neighbors. n 'f
to^ ,1';■
;gar, o Dave Evans, Representing Titan Properties, stated they would accept fJ''�
f.'t',,4, . Y p a i s ._ Y y • questioning 1 g' ,�1 AYA'
y��, denial of the variance. the j4,
,,i.c density as the property is zoned for multi-family and x they n_. are ,',
('; proposing high quality homes. He asked the Commission accept staffs if"!
1EV 1tr recommendation. L',.1..:1
�,
,,((�", 0 Debra Naubert added that NPOi 6 had also met with them and agreed ' ;"a
•+4zti y .. • d R 1
,■ ,' with their concerns. I�'''t
t p«. i
/ ?UBLIC TESTIMOY
4 t
,'-, 0 Jan Haskin, 14370 SW ball questioned why a road was being proposed on
Se
her parents property.
Jtl
';',4,:'
�>K�, b David Evans stated that there would not be a t e unless d.
property e
1"' the owner chose to to build one and that Currie would �J*
i
r/ 'i make that determination. ,'
�,w
,f�y 111
I. 0 Discussion followed regarding street patterns and access points. r,
n
f.0',0, 0 Commission Vanderwood questioned why they where allowing four ple�:es ,,
,,,', to abut single family residences. Discussion Billowed. 'l��y
I 1 A
i
r
i
{ PUBLIC HEA[tINC CLOSEt,iH ',
,' #
(c;.,',;:. PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION ,
t.
li,.
iiy,ud{
o Commissioner Vanderwood was concerned that policy 6.3,3' was being .'
c�Y�;` violated. She was concerned with lots 11 thru 14 and 64 thru 67. 0,,,
‘« discussion followed regarding density transition 1 4.
Id f'..
rar'h
t,:' PLANNING COMMISSION ION MINUYri Cebruary 21 i 1984 Page 1°w
I
IsiP..
r'.4.'5.. , N r. h�rljlrArv+Pi�"yfM,.M1.!1yp W.'Y'e 'n,Mlr.!i9mM.Rf.^!;N 1. wu•urr.. .wn. J . ;\'. Y. .,
.. , It S..I�•y ., �.r-.. .A..' Y 4 PiY•, Ia;.,...t.,.. «.... ,,.. rR.. hP`}'"t?+ w a ,....+
N , � ,.,1: 1 t L. ,., R .,...., ..,.,. 1. r+v,;er'+,.. ,a, >.r..er.. Is a,- IiX" 4«
r , , ‘V no ,C. a .\ '''lI n... ,1 . , 4 .1 1 1 , '47.,1 t ,. ,'re 1 .
., Y V S..r. ,.- . 1 I� 1, 1 {, I... E, i
,• . , ! ..,, ,1,,<. � Y ., n 'ti.,.i�u � ..., ,i.1��,C,' .,,Y�.Y �R!: .s P i �Y.,;tI r ` �' , at, y r a r ..
-.Ae Y9,_,1.......;471;r:,. ,. y•".,. .�• i v�ei, X • ,�..,�.. 4 °h e� ,.,:,4,,,.h ,E': J fn S;}7 • 'A IJ t, r :',;,',I,.. 1.;„1,::,
is ,iivgib i «t, 1J i r, r4r to t WA �t � P a� ' 4,/ w.4 • Y, .};� c +M "��
y
r a w � ,._,;YrY in;: '�an 17j'�X�, r1Y,a it t M� 'r.:. n 1. k
..
.,.Yr:.0IB-•3.... �.t_..a.1r,..,M 3,t 9.�S,........ . ...f r r,..r.,,s�>:,�...1 K„L,.-...,.L ..,._..,.,:r:r,1,-..1 .,r..:Ii..t,'.r.:r..ti ,._.,a.v..,.,Y- ..:r il.r..,. r+:'...,%.1.'7.t,. .,:r n.a4 f,..-,rr1-,,sr.+.n,. t ,, r..':,h t r 1r. t..h t M(..,.h ,G.'.1., ia v,1.1a•i.+f �.l.. J �t.r..a.J-vf r.+.s,1�, r+ ` S 9r �• � +'
J,r
t 1
,r
td
rtiI6 'iil,'1:3
w,, .'Y: IA y,
stn P z
ti'rF
.,,,, �. w0.
0.t
.It` )1
1' rA
'1,.,,,;.,1' , tiny h A,,
i w is t.
Jkf,
k,d�'� F(
x,A . o Discussion followed regarding the construction and safety aspect of IA
P-,-,,t, s
br"Iy the cut-de-sac
r,,
''..,=.,,:.,.. 0 Commissioner Vanderwood moved and Commissioner Fyre seconded to adopt ,ic.s
i'7 staff's finding and recommendation adding the following condiions. F;i
rr
ri4 in; J,,
dc,,r,' 4'
fi�`i 1. Developer will delete one of the lots between lots 11 thru 14 .''1
c p a,! {,,Y
AI ” based on the finding that it violates policy 6.3.3. °r
r+,k
p delete one of the lots between lots 64 thru 67 :f ",
, ' staff determines that ithe abutting property is an established area
u3`,'I 3. The Developer will construct a permanent turnaround at the south t,.s
'''.,, end of Fanno Creek Drive. '' '
I`rssC�t 4, Staff will clarify.. the multi-family areas to ensure compatibility t.,{
l'. tiri
1i,4,%1,V� 14, matrix met. 44
,‘,..i.,%,v,' 4,,
h,r trC. �, w +,�j!
+� Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present.
a`rr` 6. OTHER BUSINESS �t
'}' o Workshop was schedule for April 2nd, 1984, 7:00 to 11:00 P.M. .
vdl,,f
,F4.fik, 8. Meeting Adjourned 12:00 midnight 'u
ai 'J
V 1
,Y -0. illl.
i,+ 7ederks S _ _ '`1
�f, tir;'� Diane M. , Secretary �y,
+ti^t f. e∎
',+',:',V, ' ATTEST:
rid f
I
a.RvjJ
ltr i ky k '-
tF
i ,
r,V
,,,,p,.' V eeP es ident Donald Moen in
tY
A\5,47:,'t i 13
eft °' it■
1 0 ,;V
`rk'
t ''+ fir:
rib t
'/''''',1 q i+'
1
111' (OVj{�27P) I.,I
It A
�il
, ,
' PLANNING C�MM S 1CN MINUTES february 21 1984 Page 6 N
r.J + ,,,
' tA
w I F ;,
C41JY
fi .:.,.... ,., �m. ,.,.....
„-:,,.: :',,.,.'v._,, r•. .,.,A.!'..,,..::,.,....
�,•. ,. .^,.....:,... . •. . ... a
lv+.5
'.'
1
,
i A A', ,,,
r�:ta i 1 i .r f I :a. r . 1 , :, 1 •.-I..8 �,,t,w.r., .r.. krlalv� n r,+ r u �vW ra,I y xIA, ^♦1 1 t 4.,';,a C � (J' ' µ � 'I ,9 {r OA" 9 r 4t rµ'I + 1. k a si" ,,
.Y k L 7w_a r. A a t t .1.. .r ak tP r ..r,,T, v i 1, ).1 a+r r,u, r,r{,.q, .,I r+ ;{ .$r./r,al.r?rJ,y4 rt.J A W,@.:q 6 L �;J d., 41rflTI.,.n t j� c.Yt r t r. I 1•i?it� L.r A4�, r%1 r, J k�r� r 4,h.,4 N i;
�:i:
'v,..,-N,4 „ ...a 1...4.rn..,,.N..,f..,o l...,..t..,.t 1 r Y.,,o 4 4 a.v,.."s�S 4n.•r.:f!.r,s,.r...-....4(,t Vi--r.,-!F t, ,.l;.,...,...r,.....,„.4r-. rr.•.,. t:,..v,.... ..1..,,+.,Y�.. ..L...1:.Y..-'r:....tt�1 h 0 ..,c.M.r.,.,..I...A.”...'F r„6-:,1,-„, ...A v..-..q.,1,v. ,�.�.i�...,r.>'a,.'a.}'...•..r..h...,.4�f,,e 1 i...-1.- ;7(r .Y{..:,. ..r.r i,,.,„f1 1 y�r Y.n r-,....",:,+,,A lrar'.^.,.r,, `t{•^r,i; 4 a'.:..... v.4 y"tS G''•.,...,4V i v•,�. r a a.''>•
v,:t+.,
C..
e
t«
1 rAy
}ir,11 t" ,,ri
it,, ,,,t,1 Y
u 3
o',' ,y 1°
,try r k 4, 1.9:
GAY
',it''''
rri,
Ir l;
q YV
Mfr . STAFF REPORT s
t”, , AGENDA ITEM S. aiyY'
'';"" FEBRUARY 21, 1984 - 7:30 P.M. 'A^'
,,��0r TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ,A''';'r l
"4, FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL LECTURE ROOM `,t,
t"4ti ,k,
', 10865 SW WALNUT STREET
ti,k1
.,,'4
oq TIGARD, OREGON 97223
�'
7,.
M11
'i} IV i r;
1
1p;;f A. FINDING OF FACT {rF
f,i< 1. General. Information .,,,,.>,fY
.yip`• CASE: Zone Change ZC 2-84, p
Planned Development PD 2 '83 'H
Fah
1 '') Subdivision S 11-83, Variance V 6-83, Colony Creek Estate '`1`'
1 I I III, I V NPO #5 ,;''
1 ,. r
+,its,:
II,
It w7!
+'',',,',.t 4 REQUEST For a zone change from R- 12 to R-12 Planned Development for _/
. acre parcel conceptual d ;�
,,,�Y,, a 2 `49 acp p repel (251; '12a8 3700). For conce tua:. ani ,i:-,1,
�s,`,{, detailed plan approval of a Planned Development for all ,,N1;
"' phases) . For preliminary plat approval of a 67 lot , '
r'I' subdivision, single family detached units (Phases II, & ;�
,,''' III). Also for a variance to allow zero lot line `' ,,
',''`i' construction in an R-12 zone (detached units), and to reduce �t'.,
0,,) the front yard setback, i.e. , distance between the property ,,,,,,,
4 ! ,.
4,,ti, line and the front of the garage from 20 feet to 18 feet:. ,1,,
t 3
l I[ �
�} COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION. Medium Density Residential �,,,
t
rl x.
1
d rr i, ,1r r
13 ZONING DESIGNATION; R-7 PD (1.2. 78 acres) "";.,
ti
Y11
R-12 (2.49 acres) "
is kill ■,t
4,,F,,,', RECOMMENDATION: Based on information submitted by the applicant, ;ulu
. 4 staff l s analysis of applicable Comprehensive Phan ,,K,
,P '', Polioies, Community Development Code provisions and x
�lilvv'` the field investigation, staff recommends approval of
,,, zC 2-84, PO 2 83, and g 11. 83 and the request for
'"` zero lot line Construction in the t1-�12 tone subject to ''a`t
"Y1,y�
y. r c ; ! in r,f
1��, conditions listed in this staff' report. Staff ,'ti
' ''`' denial of the variance for reduction of the r"
P1i., �r c.c omred property f
k'�'' front. of Yard setbacks e�ara �e from 20 feet tol8fee�.�iie and the t�kl.
,l k ,, garage
rlrk:1 Ct C7 t!N
,r1h'+' APPLICANT; Titan Properties OWNER: Setne `,
,+ ,�; 2201 NE Cornell Road ,;!'
a ,
' ' Hillsboroi Or 97123 i�,y'1,
'4'.."4,,y ,; 'ill'
[`kit LOCATION; east of SW Hall Blvd. & west of SW Fanno Creek Drive (Wash I.
tiY�' Co, Tax Map 251 1288, Tax Lots 100, 101, 3400, 3601, 3700' .
x�ry" and 4300)
1
1r, , . t,�
y; LOT A1U Al 1$.27 acres ,; '
"
r NPG COMMENT: P1 #5 reviewed the a p 1iCa n t h � request 'a� their a 1'
,� r
''i
ireg filar meeting on Jantutry 18, .1984 and disousaed °,R
Yrq P, i t.,
A><,,, serf ,.a1 eoneer�1s with the appiinant ,
P"
r ,
X11„”t PUBLIC NOTiC S MAILEb: 84 tiotteeS were' mailed. 14��,
AA
r}r't!,^,..�.,. ... . .... .. ..,,. +r ,..,*,.., r .,,::.�:• Y, � f 1. Ir.:f yl 4 S,X��,
, a ;.: ,.,,u,.r ''' "a •!a A• , .W , l t,M twKi',; A.: t r �,'. 1,. ,.).1,..('.r t
r , ,,,.,. w,,. ,.,. . .,.., '4'1,4.�r.++' v+w, w ah. .:w..,, +�, 1 E 4 M1C m 1 A l +,r l •/"
,..YA ., ..., .. n. v.7,, ,,.A ,, . :r" , ..,, f..�..,4 �..1 . -.- ,,. 1r k..; :.c,SI+C�. q ,.,..,�-.
,� r -.«... « ..,. r " 1 .:., n„ A. ., ... . r . ,�. '��",, .,� .�,t! . .w at r. �n a ,a 1 I !u '4" t,Z.., 9. f 1i,::�I -, L�;� , r:. .+a.,r`
I Y. Iw ,}.!+,i,1.,... .,t � i ..- �,., ( �,..1 r�"1 r �,�,A >•. ,.r� T S�l. � r,G:' .,�.,, 7� ,, .1;•. rf^ .�, Y Y' , .��.q, :�:j,.l� R 't"'H i �rlr:.t,ry �w �..4",�.��E.. w', ,+,,
... x Y + . f) .r r , �. ,'t 1 . ., , .a_..: h. ff L , ',. ith N:
P , ,x;. .,, aw „n F. ,�. 4., . ,.. . ,., r., !f. f,. i:. t t. .....RP. .1.. 3. xi
r•.. .v x .. .... ,. :a, Z W. a . r ., .1 .,F ,. n , ,t ... 4, -..:a. r,. r,... '�:yt,M. r Y. .�J... < xl:. ! ;f, ,. .r - .
x ..n..., ., 3, ... n},, ..+ .. .. , , 1.'R }. ..I ..'�.'IX 1, -.. �,. ,... 1?....r .,.,. ..,I.J.' ,fr.... y ..f.. akw 4 j. ;;:rµ} t i. t.f +LI. 1
�.,r�:`� , , ') .. r r.: ,. }.,.w. Rn... .d...,.,i. "°'.. .. .�. , . . .. +.b.....�ti..,.f, E. v:...)..5, ,Y.ry,.. �. ... ...,.,P.r+.. r.,+t,��i..t�-0`•'.:1, . :`flll r,1:. .�. 1 'r,! - !. ,,"1.,',,,,,,,i,,,
�. .... r� '::.s i,,t P. .e.. .,.. .. .!.., .... 1; ,. ,..r n `f,. ,'1,, 9 14t r...' n'= ,Y :r.
7 Y
k,,.`,`,1 yy f F
}rrt r y MAY y
>','1 ,c re4,
,'q }
,.;, .., ,,4 F t, ; „t,S
1' �
e ,
„,.,\.,
tiip ,
r� is'b` I
Y r' l t
1Ct=:.y 4 1
t i w f r `
�kn f }
11),1'it .y .
"°y+P', 2. Background '�'r
nil y'
lyt, t. i 4 t
vbi11,',y
1h,`t e +''',;:.''
` �' On march 21 1978 the Plannin Commission a approved a preliminary plan 'i,;
R1>11' 1978, g
+{' ° and program for the Colony Creek Estate Phase I. "='
'''.' On June 26, 1978, the City Council approved a general plan for Phase I ,"
11t, !,t a
6i,,,,',
�, i
,'�;- (Ordinance No 78-40) • ,r,'r
�4 preliminary plan
,t.;:','
o +;'� On June 20 1978 the Planning Commission approved a reliminarr lan
+�4,L for Colony Creek Estate Phase II and III. `
yy�ae ;1��i;'
N,:' approved a,t MR
' �Rt January roved ay eneral tan for Phase II and III gfor an 81 �.
11.0,, R- to R- 7PD and a p
On Januar 8, 1979, the City Council a zone re request from .>
',,, 7 approved g
1�1 .
x� unit residential planned development. Also, the Council approved a zone '51
r"a' $ request from R-7 to 3007pD (Ordinance No ect property (251 1288, {'";
,)," .. change re uest f.
R}t,., Lots 100, 101, 3400, 3601, 4300). ( ' 78-83) ,(�wY
r y
y'
tt; On March 3, 1981, the Planning Commission granted a one (1) year ,j1+.
't,,,0".. extension for development of Colony Creek Estates Phase II & III. 41,4!,
ktR . .�:
it''t� In March, 1981, property changed ha . pp ,„�
nds and d nec,t a lication for -7PT7 1�,'
';4'' general plan review was made for presentation to the Planning Commissions
," j 1
s' a"f On May 5, 1981, the Planning Commission approved the preliminary plat ,?,„
It1'fc: for Phase II & Ill with several conditions ��,;;
Ii,CR
• \f' On May 9, 1983, the City Council adopted the Comprehensive Plan Map ar,
1,f designating the property medium density and the Interim Zoning Map ;i�'�
a�y
r: A designating the property R-1 (Lots 3400, 4300, and most of lot 101) R-7 ;'
1µ:{1 ti
Pb (Lot 100 and some of lot 101) , and' R-12 (lot 3700). `','
' 9R "s
''',,'.4:,,t1
3. Vicinity_ Information `,s{;}
''Vriftl' The site is located east of SW Nall Blvd. , north of SW Bonita Road, and �'s
,,`' west of SW Fanno Creek Drive. ,
g
• rl, The surrounding land` uses are as follows: '�
} ,,r, . ,�P,s
el'.old f yl.z
tr
'Ex
� i
,r ,,r
t+", To the north is y states, developed as ,,;t;
l,
s phase I of Colon Creek E
ttached housing units, To the northeast is
'',4',',,,! designatedillightacindu industrial,1, and it is vacant. ` o the south is ;,;
,,t !' designated medium density residential) zoned -�12) and is the elop developed as ''1
+j�;o' b fort of single and multi family residential. �,
combination
_ : existing residential development known, as Waverly Meadows, developed as ,c ',
,,�,°°; g y r .g units, Duple ces directly
°,;4;, sa.n 1e fa,mil detached and attached housiri ,
ftt, 'y+ abut the proposed towrihous+� uni �..� r5 wed k 7 g is ;
r''' ,_ is (Phase IV) o th st is desi hated
' `r residential toned 4 an - .y and ,
,��y+,;' low and medium densit; re, , ��
,%ati,.,p
f 11 111; 1
developed as single l+amxly residential, hota'ever� the land .zoned' k 12 s
'�y• ,t vacant, ,iti!
+ 4, 5_it� e Information
.5��27 acre v"acar�'t, parcel and it consists ,;
R
rsl ,,
kit: subject property its a l�' ri�ists o� ;s'
ho„-'' silt tsX lots.ro Slopes on the site ar n ;wa. ty oriented toward east. `
1 ,
t'f�� ` r way from sW Hall blvd, at a grade of a�pproxitmtately two to five a1k
,
'y�i!',; STAFF REPORT �C � 84/Pb � 83/S 11"83/V 6-85 PA,(��, 2 ,r
,n11
r.,.:
l y14'..
, r,ic,i+l `, . . ,...,r'. +„.,.::.,...... ...r:e.l.. "`F n „.-4,,,,-,,,,,,
,.., *%...s!'t ''. » « .*«r.,...v i..h., .,..,'..4 w,.y. n XX 'R '.,o,r,. r W..}.p f,«. , 1., rt�r x yI 1r*,,,',..',.�e. ,a �'r..f. t f F 1 „ba.,A
yy. ;''
J4'4;
.r .t f. r'e t , r .au r r,r i Y a C.,,�,r e,,r,u+,,,,.Y�,t.tr,1 ,Y f of '''.,.A .." , ,+4..r ,A•'t if 1 f,4, Y4:„.y a.ii,i(r t,.r A,.,1,r Yn1 1,,vt f,s.t '''4',!,;',-1.'.;t; ;,J k� .y 44 ,4 d 1 1,,x 11,11 i a u.. , r dr.-',RN rf f i ay tSi
+
: t 4r r Pr 1 1 1:..f �,,,, ;4 ti ;.
y
i .
t1 4 ry,1-..,.�Y........:t.,:�:r•.L'....,,.r."...qD.,n ...x.,r/.r I L.., �.:,....S',...a..r r.Y ..,.._F..-.,1.•t,y,.r r,�d...t.V.r......7 r.',...,p,.1{Y.YI....,. 1 .Nr a i�5r h�.+,..,v.... a,•.,�f 1,t..L� }n.e..?=�a...F k:t........S.t r.r,t.,,Y Ts, lr rr..,:y .+e,...C k,-...�'aC,.br, �,,r..; Y o R,R'� 1 4+1jKMf>ri .'f;'''''''' ':!;":'#,0",;,..4'.';..>1 �.- . St t r n Y tCt:r'a r!
P M{-,ri..
:4 i
r ("F:r+ it?.
r•I
y
1 \e::
It{r
y
4, !(t•Si to
4s pt ,,s
• 0a
4‘:+t' t
S V':
11 1 ty art;
i percent. The elevation at the southwest corner along Hall Blvd. is ;
i G1 approximately 180 feet sloping to 150 feet near where proposed SW Fanno ``
+t Cr mee e p
k Drive meets the boundary on the east. The elevation is e'y,
approximately 162 feet at the northeastern corner. ,1.
411.;, !,,t
■
1�"?r; The major physical characteristic of the site is Fanno Creek which runs �1;,
;al':' through the northwest corner of the site. In that area, the portion of i"`{'
t 2
i},t the site below 140 feet elevation is in the Fanno Creek floodplain (1.4 ,,'t
Y acres). Fanno Creek serves as the collector of storm drainage from this .k{,
r
1` '` area, An additional drainageway traverses throu ►h the southeastern '�`"
"•',t,. corner of the property. Some areas in both the northeast and southeast t
' ' portions of the site contain slopes over 25%. No development is Aae
p P Y r''
J,'" proposed for these areas. Both these areas are to be dedicated to the
r:= Y,ki
,l t ;
t „ City as open space, kk;
rr; r„,q,,
Prv,, Soil types on the site appear to be silty clay loam and quatama loam of '1'
�r ty-
ri ,; poor drainage. Flooding is freq along Fanno ,±'
oo:� frequent in the. northeast corner al
F
r,, Creek. This area is to be retained in natural form and dedicated to the °+;
';,� City as open space. There is little erosion hazard on the site with the ,,,
exception of the southeastern corner Tlwhere ates ex s erosion hazard is severe !r';”
' ",c'; due to excessive slope (over 25%). : so to be retained in "
tuft natural form and dedicated to the City as open, space., t
t'Y"`, Vegetatio'n growth on the site varies considerably. The central portion 'ra
„
4 `,," of the site is primarily a meadow with scattered coniferous trees with f
u'' an average size of 18"� in diameter. These trees +stretch from north to' ,.,
' f`y
:t ;1'; southeast corner of site, and they divide the site visually in hal ,,
`J,, ' The applicant is proposing removal of about 29 trees for efficient lot `<R4
,,,,. configuration purposes. To the northeast is a dense woodland along the
rr}' Fanno Creek which would be retained as open space. ,i.
" w .(, The development has been designed to compliment existing adjacent land „
1,,., uses and physical sical. conditions. Sin le-famil. detached dwellings are
,�,*'( p y g 'j ;'
,f,,r planned for the southern and western portions of the site. Townhouse r;
i r i , units are proposed for. the northeast corner' of the site adjacent to the Fc`;
r'Fr '
proposed Fanno Creek open space area. The units will be surrounded b t;�'
. p p - p p by ,er
�f open space on the north and west and Fanno Creek Drive on the south. on
. I o e
�,!4x r y ;,
} ,#1, the , f r p p kra
east the townhouse units will. abut an open apace tract in Waverly
ty �; Meadows which will separate the proposed townhouse units from the i.,,,
, 4'f. existing multi-family attached units in Waverly Meadows. '`
'i. proposed , Ipt 11 ....p .., li i1 ° h are i
1 e,�t,
," Several tracts are ro osed in the. deve o meat an most o w � c
R reserved for access or open space. Tract A and Tract C are p,oposed y
,irk tr 5 foot dedications to increase the right-of-way width of SW Hall Blvd.
r�,a t Tract f18" is proposed as a 30 foot wide private drive to provide aceess vt
r"r { ,
'Y to adjacent proposed dwelling units. Tract "D" is proposed to be traded t
„;,� for temporary access to Phase II o the development. By agreement with' '"
r„+� , applicant f p "'"
the owners of TL 102, the a licant would build a tem orar, 26 foot wide 4� rN F f
14'1`',' paved roadway, as shown ors. the Conceptual bevelopment Flan. Tralct "D
i, i would be traded td the owner of TL 102.
,►�" . . .._. 71te portion of the x;foadwa,y {Y,
ei r„
!,' ' through Lot 58 would be removed tupon compi,etion of Phase Ii and Itio ;<
,°p?' Tract "8" is proposed to provide access to "Mr. Cash's lot") TLS 4400) ti
Yar 9q
access r p l it digMi' p pp �arec` with .',
,,,:v1,,,' 2S1� Section 12. Tract 'If`" is sro osed as a large open space
rr cess from Fanno Creek Drive. Tract C� and H are pro osed private �y
''` r drives to serve the adjacent proposaedy townhouse una ts. Tract r'I'r + is r{,1
�ti,f as a large open spact;,r tract With adce s from liann'i Creek Drive �I
iw
a�° ,. proposed � ; s '
., and Tract "0". �'
1",,e STAFF" R 81CkT ZC '2-84/Pb 2-55/s 11-83/V 6.83 . FA08 J ;,,�:
r
, r , A is
'.s.',.',,,',,,,,,,, ....j..,;.,,.....,.. .,.i, o.n (.i,.,47,' 1.,..,�,ry...av, Y,„r a}..,*1'
t 1 a.",.,...:v..,,.%.. '.4,ra,s!4+y...,"1,,,.'4.....,.,.,r Y.,m f V. Y. 4, , i+iv.-.°.:.T7.: !+Y r...t h,.,., . Y" +..:.q r,. .., q a�b ya f, »a:s t qr!11_.V:V:rt,'a i }}3 :I'.w �,,'a iF,,:a vr'+y��If V� i' r'*T v4j,..;.1,M?t."a. .r,qq.,."r.^wM,,:...y,, AI r,k�1.':^.',+%1i yy 4 iA.rA4,'
�.Rr f4 1�e JI "n]!! k r
't i,
r 4...
iI''
+ , •. '. � 1.. 1. 7.. . ✓. r . i-.. C . .r. . .:..-.1 ,• .. •.... ..: yrt l . t r-.•. !-ti 1'
:.- Y . "rY .. 1,..- .. ..t.., AY ♦ ..H.,. i , -,h a- \ , 1S. .(...1.f .
�.-.a:.n., .a .- ,.,. .!. u ,,,rr,S J... ,.9 4 ..e ..<.. ....N`.,f xr ".... .. ,r t.. -.. ,. <a W a 1 Yx.e..;t r ;I..A v 1r „
!..i _,.,�. , r :!. ,. d..,. .rrt rr •- .. -. �r .. ,... , )Ire., ,._..t. .,. "r, `H� 1 `, ,: a i': , x. ., .(,.
,.,.. .S:",..., ,. �.,..-. ,. ...r �.5,..,r„ .,-.t.. ,.�,.�✓ .. .r4. f r ,t.'k .: ..}',. yV: ,rf y 1. 1 x ufy f i 46 ::1 :e:'r. r.' ♦ !�
}'�.�..... ,.7 ..,:.., nh,t.l.� r.:e l".., 1 .:. ,. ., y . , A,....,,,.,.,t.5,�1 a, ,1.e.,f.1,. .ti„ .1,.i.w.,a,.. +,,,h..,il...'�.�• .S^�., .,.,�,.=•r•• ,t.e ,!1�; -.411.�.. , ..tr5 rV..,:,•.(. .Y:..,..y,,l{{ ,1 ,r.:;«r �{cS'4r.:♦� '��I
1: '' '�' rrr a �,- � �, ,. .♦ .Y, is ♦ ,.. ., � 'Yiv�'� i�
r.♦ r �ij
> �'; ,:.=.‘.!=.=',,'-,Tr
,-,=.4.1.,-i!,
.,
1,y,(u 1)=.,y;;=,
}S,t,. _ 4 C+1a t
'(+1AAf; .,,,.. _ .._ ... .-._. .. .. =4..,/,,,,,
,, F fr
y, �t r
=',41.-
t •t•
r
Tracts "A", "Cit, "F", and "I" are proposed to be dedicated to the City ";;
altiti of Tigard. Tracts B G and "H" will be maintained by the, a
,1.4 homeowners' association. 'Tract "E" is proposed to be sold to Mr.. Cash. 5^''
1,,t, B. APPLICABLE PLANNING POLICIES sj
r1,Ri� ,'
a
}(ti,,, : 1,. Comprehensive Plan_..Po l.ic ie s- 'i
1,:y 2.1.1 THE CITY SHALL MAINTAIN AN ONGOING CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT 't i
':',, PROGRAM AND SHALL ASSURE THAT CITIZENS WILL BE PROVIDED AN -3
{�.41, OPPORTUNITY TO BE INVOLVED IN ALL PHASES OF THE PLANNING 4,,
— PROCESS. 4ti,,
,;ryp,'l', a
1.1
+$i Notices were sent to all property owners within 250 feet of this j-'
',,,,,,L' application. A notice was published in the Tigard Times on ;,i
'4'I' February 9, 1984. In addition, NPO #5 has been notified of this •y:
a'. application.
■¢∎,• 1.71
P'P■v
If14
;'iii ' 2.1..3 THE CITY SHALL ENSURE THAT INFORMATION ON LAND USE PLANNING t}z±
}:im4 ISSUES IS AVAILABLE IN AN UNDERSTANDABLE FORM FOR ALL t7;A
∎1 INTERESTED CITIZENS. 1+y„
4''i All interested parties are given, at a minimum, 10 days to respond }
�r
,y';,,P• in writing to the application and request under consideration and ��`
,'r,, are encouraged to do so. The planning staff is available to
t',r address any specific questions concerning the application or the
t„t. application process. ,s*
`rkxr,,` 3.1.1 1.1 THE CITY NOT ALLOW DEVELOPMENT IN AREAS HAVING THE FOLLOWING Gt
tr, kl,
,,,,,,,„, DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS EXCEPT WHERE I'1' CAN BE SHOWN TO THAT �',
�,yw, w P��
ff
ESTABLISHED AND PROVEN ENGINEERING TECHNIQUES RELATED 1.O A '{
tn`1 SPECIFIC SITE PLAN WILL MAKE THE AREA SUITABLE FOR THE PROPOSED k
4h�1I DEVELOPMENT ;E
11 ,, ;'
'4(,1.„ a. AREAS HAVING A HIGH SEASONAL WATER TABLE WITHIN 0-24 INCHES { f1
1�1,, OF THE SURFACE FOR THREE OR MORE WEEKS OF THE YEAR; ,£,'
' b AREAS HAVING A SEVERE SOIL EROSION POTENTIAL; 1;r?
o„,, c. AREAS SUBJECT TO SLUMPING, EARTH SLIDES OR MOVEMENT, "r,
r t ,,i
Its ,„ d. AREAS HAVING SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25%; OR ,44'
,;,"j,�' e. AREAS HAVING SEVERE` WEAK FOUNDATION SOILS j;,
' ';'. The subject property contains two areas with develo meat
r �,
r;
r` 1
',” limitations. One is the northeastern corner of the site where the r,<;
1,91 r - . � 4,p;
.vJ Fanno Creels runs through, and the other area is the southeast
t;,,' corner with slope yin e�ccess of 25%. Both of thew areas are to be x;2
'�� dedicated to the City and retained as open space, x,
f bIP" r,3
wart', 6.1.1 THE CITY SMALL PROVIb1 AN OPPORTUNITY `OR DIVERSITY OF „�`
1�''` HOUSING DENSITIES AND RESIDENTIAL TYPES' AT VARIOUS PRICE AND 'r'�
+{x r� xr
to r", RENT LEVELS.
T i. The planned deve op pm and subdivision of this property wi l i x'','
.. "rovide varied ousin 8 t yp es r i.e. 67 detached sii E le fanil y "
i,t. t!
'
,s
hoses (majority With zero lot line Construction on lots that rang 4;
Etom ,SUU to 7, 00 square feet) and 34 townhouss, ;'`i
„P
t,b 0,1,
11-85/V ``4%l',� STAFF REPORT r 20 2-84/Pb 64 83 4PAOL 4 lY
( u.
4.,. i, �:.:. ,.,,...,. ,, r.. ,. • x � R v'.'{, S H 1 �y 1,■ ,.4n
l, ” ..,:.,...�: ...�.+ :..» ✓,".,,.;,w!„.yy..an t 4,,,„,,,i,:1;10,00,00,,,.:; ..:; 4 .� '�� { I f 1 x tr 1::,
,, 1 ...,J' i 7,1;' ti 'G �. .C. a k7k^, , .a. .<. , � "!. ., �'::'- " 1a1, C..Y". { ,t t >'v =i''.., ?• P,,■Y -,J .. -, +.,.n r... ,, ,..r1 l. ,{ ...,i+"'.'" r..�., x. ,..,+., ,.,.r#' k +�{''' ,yj , t b`W `ty'..T, v
,"a..r- .,.. o- a-�,..', ,� ,,.. , r.. ,,.. t..lt '....,. q x .< -! , ,. :.:� a -,.1... .:,. 't ,,.�,:., v,++ , , � r,:... 1 -.1-..=,-11 '..,
w.., ,a ..,�.« .1 .,,. .. .Ix , x r. �:b. l.. x._..r,,. ,..,.,:,.....G. l ��t ;- iyr . •...., /.,.,,., r S 8f n N �;tlr>.
.I k ,:..m C 1 . f ,:.l�/'rx a ,.....,r xr l >,. ,..(._ ��.... x, �:� .w,.r 1. d'A, �,, .-,.,- ,w�".. 9 f i ^I 1 ,.k 1 ,.'�.y }t • " ...,.1'!- 1 ; , ,'
.,- ,x.x._, x, .0¢:• .;::.,r . y ��,� ,. . : a�� t s� 1. �i „�f xt ,e.,;', `.. � ,, "4, .� t t.: . a. M r ,.
t.P.t
,, ,,,,,,„■.',..;,:,:,,:,
,',1.4,\,?,
'
I J
...T.1, The net density in R-7 and R-12 zoning districts is about 8. 7 ,11,
units and 12 units per acre respectively this includes density
transfer from the unbuildable land in floodplain and land with
slope in excess of 25%).
,/,'.... 6.3.2 IN THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE THE CITY SHALL
',:,,.41',
,,,
, REQUIRE A DENSITY TRANSITION WHEREBY INCREASED RESIDENTIAL f,1
11),
‘.','
DENSITIES ARE ADJACENT TO ESTABLISHED AREAS IN THE FOLLOWING
MANNER: 'esi
'.'w
vt
o.,..
. .
a. THE DENSITY WITHIN 100 FEET OF EACH PROPERTY LINE
Y ...,,,0
SHALL NOT EXCEED 25% OVER THE DENSITY SHOWN ON THE
ffPit ,,,
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE ADJACENT LAND UNLESS THERE .„
IS AN INTERVENING ROAD (MAJOR COLLECTOR OR ARTERIAL)
IN WHICH CASE THIS PROVISION SHALL NOT APPLY.
,.
! ''.h. b. WHERE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ABUTS AN EXISTING
'''..:
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, THE HOUSING TYPES SHALL BE
COMPATIBLE. FOR EXAMPLE: Aw,
4
'',:;., I TWO HOUSING UNITS WHICH ARE ATTACHED ARE
st
•.,,,,,,..
»01s'., CONSIDERED COMPATIBLE WITH A DETACHED SINGLE 1....,,
FAMILY UNIT; BUT 1.r,
'',■,S 41 4'
).1:,,';‘1,' 2 HOSE THAN TWO HOUSING UNITS WHICH ARE ATTACHED
ir.,,
ARE NOT CONSIDERED COMPATIBLE WITH A SINGLE
4,,,,,,,A FAMILY DETACHED UNIT.
l,,,
)'
!,
The subject property is adjacent to established areas to the north ,4,1
t,,,,,; and east, The proposed density is similar to the existing
,4,..
, 9
residential development to the north and east) ie. , seven (7) . t
units per acre. Proposed housing types are also compatible with
:6,: ', the existing residential developments, i.e. , detached single
;;
family homes Phase II to the north abutting Colony Creek Estate I,
,.
'.1,,n and townhouses Phase IV abutting duplex residendes at Waverly
Meadows to the east
6.3,3 IN ALL PHASES OF THE DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL PROCESS IN A
';',';',;',.•,, RESIDENTIAL "ESTABLISHED AREA", A PRIMARY CONSIDERAT/ON OF
ql.,v
THE CITY SHALL 88 TO PRESERVE AND ENHANCE THE CHARACTER OF
,...,,0 THE ADJACENT ESTABLISHED AREAS.
'.4,,',,'
The purposed development wilt preserve the character of the
i.,,0; 4 '
established areas by developing compatible housing type to the ' '
north and east,
6.4.1 THE CITY SHALL DESIGNATE RESIDENTIAL "DEVELOPING AREASi" (WHICH
:V-
4 0." ARE NOT D8SIUNATED AS ''ESTA8LISHED AREAS") ON THE COMPREHENSIVE
,
'„, PLAN MAP) AND ENCOURAGE FLEXIBLE AND EFFICIENT DEVEL0PMENT WITHIN l'4.,...
„4 THESE
,..
The aPplicant ia proposing to develop the subdivisibt as a Piataad
:4.fJ 4il
Development to allow more dffieient uae of land and more flexible
' ;.'k development standard, Specifically,0 the applicant is requesting
,''.
tero lot line cdnStrUction mid a reduetion in the front yard
.‘,.1';'4 setboeki i.e, ) the distaned between the property line and the
front of thd gataVd.
0
STA REPORT - '4C 2-84/PO 2-83/8 It-83/V 6-83 - PACE 5 1
'4'4'l'''' `,,'41 n4 ,,i',.. , ,44-,',,,,,r4, ,,'r 4'r ).`',,:r,v,r,, 4..; `'" y''' f,,,f, '4'7'-l'''1.11,11''':;:r47:,ii".::■7.4 'r'4, 14 44''4 4'''4"..4,4 , ''',44!.,'' ..., ,
' I
,t.-.tt,' ...■C,4., ,..■.■,,4 ';" n.,,,_ v.....,,,,., ,t,,t i e,.. ,`,..• ",,'.; •,■ o",1+ ' . ..',+,,,P '..0),'/,''..1.'..,—,t, , .,,, ., `.I .,,^,,,,,':.■.o',',,d. .',1,',4%t rt' '-t,'1,', ','4 ;,,,,:t" ,, kt';rt„, A.'b.''tt"`A tt",,t tt,tt''t
'tq:•'? .,'''',1,`1,
/14''151
141'01'1.
' .
r ,
i'l.‘ ,
• ,
6
•';'1,•r r
'1•
1,7' r
,•
7.1.2 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE AS A PRECONDITION TO DEVELOPMENT ,.
rl
i
„. APPROVAL THAT
k't
,frl, ?,
4 Al,
a. DEVELOPMENT COINCIDE WITH THE AVAILABILITY OF ADEQUATE
SERVICE CAPACITY INCLUDING:
4,161,,, ik
1. PUBLIC WATER; e...,
2. PUBLIC SEWER (NEW DEVELOPMENT ON SEPTIC TANKS ,4
SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE CITY) ; AND ..
, Al
3. STORM DRAINAGE, v,
q,
, ,
o,,
,t , b. THE FACILITIES ARE: .;
kl,,I,
I,,
1,it.1 t t't,i
1q ,
Ifs,'• '41:
4,4',f t 1. CAPABLE OF ADEQUATELY SERVING ALL INTERVENING ,
PROPERTIES AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT; AND
2. DESIGNED TO CITY STANDARDS.
-
c. ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES TO BE PLACED UNDERGROUND. Z1
eci ■
The applicant is propo$ing to install public facilities in
°,,,,, . .
accordance with planning policies and requirements set forth in
k "■‘
the Community Development Code.
j,„;.,,
'0
I'''' I
. The territory is within the Tigard School District 23J. The
'
following information was provided by the applicant.
,
:,.,''.
The three schools that serve this areas) their existing enrollment °
and capacity are shown below:
I'.q I : 1,r
? Type School Name Capacity Existing Enrollment
Phil Elementary Phii LeWis 441. 446 ,
,..,
Intermediate Twality Jr. High 950
822 ,-
'
.
1,/ High Tigard Senior High 1,450 1,371 ,
1,,
4
, The 8chool district indivates that there is a potential for a
space crunch at Phil Lewis and/or Durham elementary schools
1 , .t,
,: (depending on how many children will come from this development).
,'.'il
„,„,,,, Some boundary changes (in elementary school attendance) Or
',': relocation of some kindergarten students who would normally attend 04
-
Phil Lewis may be necessary to accommodate anticipated students
from the subject propertY,
'
.,,
I, (4 , f
,
' N 7.4,4 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE THAT ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT BE CONNECTED
''i,.r,
TO A SANITARY SEWER SERVICE, r...r
,
Yi, :s■
■‘1.`..'1,+ The applicant is proposing to connect to the Patina Creek -
.,,t•p interceptor sewer line via 8 sewer mains located adjadent to the
site at Colony Creek Estate t Storm drainage also will outlet il
.,.
into Panno Creek through a formal storm drainage system built to
, City standards,
1*■;I.
7.6. 1 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE A$ A PRECONb/TION TO DEVELOPMENT THAT'
THE DEVEL0PMENT !it, 8gVVED BY A WATER SYSTEM HAVING
tfl,',,i1 ADEQUATE WATER PRESSURE POR EIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES;
1.,,,, , •4
STAMP REPO11 - ZC 2-84/PD 2-85/8 1I-85/V 6-83 - PAGE 6
.: ''' ■, " ,.. ., ,, ,..,,,.„,, ,.., , ., 1,i ..' ''" ''f . '''.'''Lli"I'''''';".'n".""'"?‘";i7-""r:7""'r""— ,t,,,,,... ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,w ,,,,.4:., , :,,,,,,,,,,r,tt ,: •,',I., .t: ,,.4.1 , *ert9 .t ,,,,,,)`,,,,,,, ,,' ., ii.,,.,„,,,,,,,■,
.4„,,,,, t„,,,.,q,....„. v i, 3 r . . « r v v,:,.,,.:,� t . .,h”. y, r '.. JM r'' s.
. :,-. 1 ... r ... .. � 1. � .. .. .i' .. � ,+ ,M..�. ,.r , .. 4.. ��' .7 'r r rr (1 rk�:w a.. y'1.
r.l .i ,I � .r 1 .... .F . z i.,... ,• y .5.. ..t 5' r 't, J .> ,t•d-rt' .t, t..i 1 l w 1t .R `;•.(.., �
> + Ftf - .. J .. d J 4. ., ..�� a. a. s. r .r 7, .. h5',•, 3.. i .....e....r...N� I.., ., it d �:i:• .t•. t�' .i •.i�'
t I ,...4 .a.i 1 x r, r. " a.., r5 i... �. f. .`1t c.-J,. � >.:�3 .s:h.. ,..n .. � -„r..,. r't t �,:r5.{!' .i t, 5'}. t �7 r .-�.l.,.;t yJ 1 t,a'7. s .r1 y•:�.
, ,.. ...,. F. ., S ..Z..h�.J J1 r 1,. t 1, r.Y?..sr'�...I,t. t.;:..V ....��t. ...,.a l..l...t ,,.t tt..f 1 1., t...._1: i M1r' a -,.rf `` �':i..
t « i .. 1. , 4 r,. rr,+vS.. .r..S.. . .,u..r ... ..., ,+ ..,. ..,7 , C �.• �,..t... . .l�.•.�... ,.q t.. ,....t d.y*:c.v t r..4.Jt•. , .,�;!;•., ! .,. ,r. :•ny-r .,fy'+.,tf,4'''77A'''''
i-41: j t' a� �;�.�
7t` 11ih:t ',
a. ;a,1,',".".;,.'i':,',
:;: i
t't ..:7 .:........ ..:.... .. _ tk
f
r,
l,;t a
N.:;•:, -t:
e i
aP.
1f~,
!y
.',7':
,,a, t�:a{
`i#'. b. THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL NOT REDUCE THE WATER PRESSURE IN ;
4 A THE AREAS BELOW A LEVEL ADEQUATE FOR FIRE 1. 'Y,'�{
,, PROTECTION
(;r PURPOSES• AND ,rY a
t ;{r1
r
'''.:'1'„;,'1'; c THE APPLICABLE FIRE DISTRICT REVIEW ALL APPLICATIONS. �
r.
'` A 6" water line will provide water services to the subject site. ,,'h�
,;
' The Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District has reviewed the `"'''
,,r4 project and approved it as acceptable for fire protection and ,}
J In 71t'
'`tr access purposes. F
`f
;v 8.1.3 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE AS A PRECONDITION TO DEVELOPMENT 4w.
w j7•, {dn
M1'„(.1,,,e'' APPROVAL THAT; '”
,,,.;.e r ; tl
, a DEVELOPMENT ABUT A PUBLICLY DEDICATED STREET OR HAVE '47
f'y; ADEQUATE ACCESS APPROVED BY THE APPROPRIATE APPROVAL ",t.ta
+Frr f w
4y•i AUTHORITY• ;>,
' A4`4{!
GJ M1+" el,a,
i j4 b STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY BE DEDICATED WHERE THE STREET IS 'rY
'fkY SUBSTANDARD IN WIDTH; .A'
,fltet}, s"f1r�
�,,, c. THE DEVELOPER COMMIT TO THE CONSTRUCTION OP THE 11
$10.: STREETS, CURBS AND SIDEWALKS i TO CITY STANDARDS WITHIN '�u
7.i.;',,` THE DEVELOPMENT'; • ',
d. INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPERS PARTICIPATE IN THE t
E IMPRUiVLMENT ';',.,1v, 4
, ; OF EXISTING STREETS, CURBS AND SIDEWALKS TO THE EXTENT ,,,,,
,,,,„. OF THE DEVELOPMENT'S IMPACTS. ;,,
;,
tJA , Access is gained off SW Hail Blvd. via Colony Creek Court and SW i.!`
ih.
y}y},4f. Fanno Creek Drive from the northwest and off SW Bonita Road via SW �.,,,,,
r 1,',
�l�', Fanno Creek Drive from the southeast. (The applicant is proposing Fr'
fy ;!, to extend SW Fanno Creek Drive to the west and connect it to SW i'.:014'',,
;' Colony e Ginterior �r � so achieved „a
�r', , vpublic streets with right-of-way widths of 50 feet, lso 1,.,
err ` there would be a 26 foot paved tempos ry access onto SW Hall Blvd,
y which would be closed physically within two years from the date of ! ;;
� , approval (the access would be closed by the construction of a 4°;r.4
, R, yy
.; house on lot 58 through which it runs).
Vin,t
Ir 5 ,4iN
t�
,-1 ” There are two alternatives for ali ntttettt of SW Fanno Creek Drive Wy1
,';.,t to the south, both of which are acceptable to the City, The '".,
�'�;r � i � s rN�hT:�
ad join tlg property to the south may be served by either
l`ii, alternative and both will remain available (please see the
,p,
a .:,rr�)r attached , x
'',',' 12,1.1 TKE CITY SMALL PROVIDE FOR HOUSING DENSITIES IN ACCORDANCE
WITH 2 ,f,lf
f Y>r
THh APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES, ��
r, {,t
'lyt. b. THE APPLICABLE LOCATIOWAL CRITERIA, „J,
t” { rr
t r .
'''',.:,4'
,w c e THE APPLICABLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE PROVISIONS.
Rr a iyF
4.
� !r� STA P` REPORT - 2C 2-84/PD' 288/S 1 -85/V 6-58 - PAGE a p
I� et,
r
,u { ,I
y � . ...,.,. -......... ...... .. a 1 t' t :t I YI
,...,,� .».,.• ,a•..tr e,yr ;. xM1 nwa� (r 44Nw r I A 1N , j
�° ,1 .....', ... .: ,::v { ,.:..: . s fi t .+^'P"s?•��N:: .+s rt .•.'" r r Y ,f, ^"5+ Yi'�i� o! ,I h , � , iY tr; rP,,1'
... ,., ,. . ,_, .t... ,. ': •....'M1 ., 4': rr 'S"":.. 'k`.,. .r PY^.... Y7 .�.. a .( m;.! ...E', rx 1 t ";11 I.. .,.
.j , J .�.;, ., rr . , . ,,J r r,,a t ar _, r'.. .at ,-, .t r, U+ � . �� ,�' � � t saa�r�"
rp' .,+° ,..,. ..� V �. a� y��9 t J 1, �,,..V V ... * ..J .. ... i. •:: �,.� q, t � rs f .}._�� V4. ♦, '.i,ti., Sky;»{ ,vw ,..,.� ... :".
,.t .-�{. ,y f+yl, :, ry ild , .r,.,_t, k„7I,r � �rl , + �, .PZ ,l•.. .� 9,� , ,.. > ,, , �: 9 _ ro ,� J � .. �.,�,
',..14-1,—....,--,,,‘-; I t . , .n. _. t• ..1 61“:"3,!;',: w r.,1 1_ .} t A i.r_ ix � f 7. ... a..,. pi :;1..',, II r1V. l.T •1, 1, .h..
,t..,'„, , . t , 1 W ..i i ., ,. ,2 :. W.. ...�.:.� I 1 r . ..... r r:,; .Y H' . i.. .t i;
,, , ,:,,:•. 1.... . a. .r. , � ,.: ., ., > M1. , � .. ,1 ..-, - .1 .� Y , 1 • �. 1 .7. t. ,7.c. rl
.f .12 ,,,,,,4'., .. .1 Y��.5i1 J■:i. ,. 4 ... r.N,-.,.. r r ., ...� . ,7 . r ,. -..,, ti4ov. r y.:i. 71 ,iy
!� ,
S... ,�}1r ... ..D , -,.. , .w . n,y.. k. , t I f f k:.! } a �,�,r,. .;14. 1 ,. �,
,...A. Y ,+1tr {„,, .. .'7 �y1.. /. .:: 1i. 4 'r "r r,t. ,1=k {. .,.. ,.,L�,1Y ,.1 l, rt 1 .Q .7 •,7” ,tr,r/ * f4,
,.. �, .. (,.,.�J. t . ,..,V�••,.Fry 5�... ,1,...'C,.,',.. N„ 1. .l, , f.,.♦ r `1. rC.....•.I7... } 4-. t r.'11 1I1 .,.r :S, ..v i1.,1 1 •.i.b '��.
v, •: , .r, 1..,...: .., ., ....,•� � -..p1 ir' Y 1. vrr'" �,t ii l'r.
J f/
4`!r
t,ik i'!''',•`:
„•
711 it' '�:(;j
rA4
117,.: '?. 4444,',.. ,1
?, ,.:::';:'is"4 tit ii t
1,1.. ' L,4lhv
',10ment conforms to those t j'f`
,' ,, The density proposed in the develop , ;�
»,fay; � �,� 1
;', established in the Comprehensive Plan policies, Plan Map and, "u}f
0',,J Interim Zoning Map. ,,v,„,,7;
2 ward _Community Development Code ; t,+c
I1P- l'4',°:'
t,+?f The applicant is requesting for a concurrent Conceptual and la ''”,
' Detailed Plan approval of a Planned Development. r t,:!,
r
jt„1
r r,F y r :
1:
18.80.010 Purpose R'):',:(.,.
1 ,
+; A. The purposes of the Planned Development overlay zone are: 4,%
.f.,'..`', 1. To provide a means for creating planned environments through ',47:'''
il+r the application of flexible standards which allow for the `,,,
''''°` application of new techniques and of new technology "in `vY;""ti`
community development which will result in a superior living
'�.0 arrangement c; �
r"' a,
)
,t',,,
leq^r .�j/wJA
r4;: 2. To facilitate the efficient use of land; ;,�;;;:
; t;
ril
■ �t:4,
3• economic arrangement of land us iidi
° tttn circulation systems, open space and utilities; �4 ,y
,,o,r
r,;
as{
,,4" 4. To preserve to the greatest extent possible the existing ';,,'
t t landscape features and amenities through the use of a ,''�i`'
, ri ,
: planning p relate the type and design of a ,,f1
rr", procedure that can
4;
,,� > development to a particular site, and s ;
,55:, i
rt,,7 5. To encourage development that recognizes ■the relationship `,';
;k; between buildings, their use, open space and accessways and , .
,, thereby maximizes the opportunities for ihnovative and ,
kh^
N,,l
3;',4,.:',;` diversified living environments. 't'.;.
, ir
t�f, The proposed planned" "development Con lands designated as hR
F; Developing Areas ) utilizes the flexibility of the PD zone to rt"j+;;■
" "Developing Areas")
provide a superior er• "
�'� p p lrvittg environment by concentrating deve`loptt�ent ;ar
�.or
' .' on the most gentle terrain of the site. The single"-.family units ,,,
,': are planned for the more flat areas of the site while the '
t multi-Crmillyattd, s (townhouses) are planned to be Located bear the ttti,
multi fama,l unxps posed open space ,,.'
k' Jh
I tt'4
� lb.80100 Phased belopectt ,, ym
�4' AA The Commission shall. approve a time sr'hedule for develop i ti,g j ' ,
)M, a site in phases) but in no case ,,5hal1 the total time period qt„.
for all phases be greater than seven (7) year w thoutl "4'
r fir , ,
; i
t,. reapplying for Conceptual Development Plan review. ,�4
'r;',' b The criteria for approving a phased betail Devetopr"teni Plan ,f`
`:r proposal are that '4
'0A,' 1;
't
'41',; 1�
The public facilities shall be cot strutted in �con3urtetion ;1
,' With or prior` to each phase; and 0
,),.: $TAI I LPOU - 20 2-84/Pb ."8518 11-85/V 6-8 - PA GE r
,t de ..:,."�u. ,,., .r+r.nW,,,,e, t, i t W r ,.
w*''' '':::'7 .,. Ar. *. ,,t ; )r,+r~ A. f t S 3 k d : aJ' „ x [ F �!.A ',G ,,,,!,P• 47?
.ru"r ... - ...... ...�.. .,. ,.,, , ,;, G «•. M.,.1,tn...t r �A«w, ,af.. ..;';'�"�.Sr,.rl . ,- T`' I ,.. IF v r..�''r t :l
,. .. ,, ,,... ,..,.. 1 a .l.., 1 , "'7""!""i`'`' , ...,.. .,1. "!Y '}' ,,. ,,.: � 't n.'� t.11 r tp..i.. , t.^� 7 , ,�'
1 ''f "4 , ,'-:, r. .....1 a1 n e, , .- {�..'�,.Sd „ '� F,v Y y+„.o,
+r h ,, -,^... , i , . ri r� , ,!��,. r7+, ,ri.” 1,'.� r f 't1 . '� , , l ,rs.�..,rl... Mn +"�. ,ta, �, L ,. ,1 t !, 1 f., , r .,,1,
, ,. c r .. ..,,. u h M :�:: r r �^ ' - .., � � � ,.. 4, +., l e M 1 1 r x'1i=
r;K;� t,Y,,..', tv 1
ti•,, .. ,i1 ,1Jrt,, ,..,',e,,,.,,, :t ♦t, '1,,. 0,, ,, ..ti�v . :,r t ;..4 i i . t ) ,fir.
r
R _ � ,`4'a 91, ,. y ; �'V '' i « 1 r YY Tt .`i ..7`r J 4.A,,' l t�'}: ,.
�� tai
3`
1 T'y
7Gf+,f s t
ifr '..e.._,T,_ .,. _w-_.m,. :,..T.'...._.....,..__:.... . :...... . s. .,a.w..n.a.. ... ..a.-....«. .., _... ..... _ .. _ '}Tf1 1 j
L ry 1` ,,,em.
4i S k.s,
r r y, +rw
'''01.
At
2. dependent dent development and occupancy of any phase shall not be '�'`t'
y
,� p n he use or temporary public facilities. A
,d
�A,„” temporary public facility is any facility not constructed to r=aY}'
`j� the applicable City or district standard. ,f4;,
11;,
„T„
';1 complete Development 2',�r;:
,��5,�� The applicant is proposing to cam lete the Planned Deveo meat •in ,T,�,;�:,
',,r< three phases, with Phase It and III as detached single-family v .,
tO,�, units, and Phase IV as multi-family townhouse units. A,.
ty4 ? 18. 160.060 Approval Standards - Preliminary Plat ,c,,..
A. The Commission may a - rove at rt. .ve with conditions ,'�,;,'
{'�,ya a preliminary plat based on! the following approval criteria ;,
tr y, 1:1,‘;,,,,:::l±h
`v,, - 1. The proposed preliminary plat complies with the City s f
`W, Comprehensive Plan, the applicable zone ordinance and other ,�,Y4
{ ,` applicable ordinances and regulations, ;+,,+G
' 2• satisfies proposed
the provisions plat Q of is ORS not l duplicative or otherwise ,s�9r�y
% 92.090 (1) , +r
r .,
;,� 3. The streets and roads are laid out so as to conform to the t;�
,�'
plats of subdivisions ,„
approved by adjoining nin and maps of asJortoparpartitions already r;t�M
5 J g P P Y width, general , 11
liken •rection and in all. other respects ects unless the City' 4.'„
2� direction P
�''�" determines it is in the public interest to modify the street �,'�+
or road pattern; ;,",
„Y1. t q+h
4,4'�'1 R provided improvements.
4. An ,
s� . n eat lanation has been rovi.d.d' for all common improvements. ,
�i'
,�s" . Commission may attach such conditions as are necessary ' �t
,,l li The C y ,
to carry out the comprehensive plan and other applicable „x/,
,; r inances and regulations and may require,
d ,,,tai,,!.
'11 1. Reserve strips be �'- ,ftY,�'';-
p granted to the �Cx City for the purpose of
;�,' controlling access to adjoining undeveloped properties. .� ,
l t �1
,A
The proposed preliminary mxnary plat 1,t;',,
r' ed re . plies with the Comprehensive . ,'
r r Plan. The �m pi
e street system designed for the proposal conforms to the
street patterns of adjoining subdivisions, i.e , Colony Creep ,`?_,
�
,w' gst ate I t , the northwest, and Waverly Meadows to the east. r
i`
''4. n 18. 160.050 Phased Development
r;`a
f",t�Y; A. The Commission may; 4PProve a time schedule for devclo in a
2„,,. Y Y 1 Y Phases) se shall the .. �,"
subdxvson an bases but in no 1 +
Y 1
°F�• � t aGtua �1
„z construction time period for any phase be greater than 2
, ,`" ears without reapplying Eor a reliminar. M,
!� y plat. �;"
rR Fi;,' H 6
,„ B. The criteria for approving a phased site development review Fe,°',
M ,
„Ix'', proposal are,
! tip.
.. ; 1. The he ublic facilities shall be scheduled to be constructed I
��r7t;i
!. Y
Iwt, in conjunction with or prior to each phase to assure
provision of public facilities prior to bu*lding occupancy +,,`
(f
1-'4, »
tf, �1 ,.L,1} ST APP L ZC 2-$4/PD 2 83/S l� 83Y 6�83 PA08 Y'r ,*.
Y
t r,
,,.,1;'-+f h`�:, Pr i: "�, ._'Pr ,m/Wt�.0 w Af : y b .J,Ifq. ti ,.. ](!I
Y f Y a ..'r , ,a ,t , f4 t°t,1 ,,t ,Y'T` tT r 'Fy $, ' ',
{`, f ,o r l , ,4L, },n rr f 1,r:r F,r,41 r Ci., f t�r I II rR A Yr,1
4
v ';'"4"'f! `';'''t.`4 L �F'1`;,!41);';414. 4:;4,4'
,#M1, ! +.f,�2f'" 51.11 54 vY k 4t ik'''•:';1, .n.try FR ,..,',..f."::',■••3f4,t e! i1p a Y,�Y n %FtI F,t r, r rY t od:�.0{
d Siw te OC:." '
t:1 tl
.r
�1trr lkkit'
,y +f,I ,r+r e s
r y+
fi t + .......:.,. »».m,.... ..._.»_... _.. . ..._.:_'.. 5r'
1,# ft
c 1-Mr
;,1,4 E?; a ; t yrk+.',
t ,, qr .1
4 i '
vt shall not be
rrsa};
ri h
,�, 2. The development and occupancy of any phase.. st a �■ rua;k
4,,,• P P Y
,'„;I,` dependent on the use of temporary public facilities. .,r,,,t•
fats,, t
r ` a. For, purposes of this Section a temporary public ,? �,,"''
>G ,j interim facility not constructed to the' �' 'rte,;
facility is an �.n
`t.t,,t applicable City or district standard. 1 F,Jik;
I tar
S 4, qtr
w ". 3. The phased development shall not result in requiring the s�
ty!; ,
F;. City or other property owners to construct public facilities 0,4,,!
col:',, that were required as a part of the approval of the nrP{
;, c preliminary plat. ' °h�
f
5�r1 ' C. The application for phased development approval shall be , ',,y�
r tt rl 4
1�t
/r,r'''4„' heard concurrently with the preliminary plat application and ° "�`
1 may appealed a15r
r!t ` the decision ma be a Baled in khe same manner as the :5,
Y P Y p PP c
y�T ; + at.
1�;t preliminary plat.
t i 1.''PO
;1 The applicant is requestin reliminary plat approval for Phase II 9 Altl
r` ` and ZIT at this time Phase IV consists of the proposed 1
u t
� f
tjt° ' townhouses and requires a Site Design Review approval 't.
1 ,
i�4y,�`,, •050 Dimensional Re•u�rements. The minimum Setbac ! ,}r'tt
18.5L 5
r y h,
4, ,irr';<'
requirements for uses in the R-7 zone shall be !. ,f�i.
1,,44 rear :1',.'",',
...,4,1!,,„ 1. The front yard setback shall be a minimtnn of 15 fer t4 ';+
FAt '. 1�t
`i FF
r,1 r
fr,r '.. * 4' shall be 10 feet however, the tl'rtj`
side facing a street s , ,
On corner and through lots the minimum setback for eac . 1,
F.'
'rA �' provisions of Chapter 1 .142 (VISUAL CLEARANCE) must be 5
rs}4,4
∎t',Y,4' satisfied. k{k,
,1%,,,„,,i ,r.
P } #ti$
i'tr,'4w.' 3. The side and setback shall be a minimum of 5 feet exce t ,"
r
Y
,,irsi this provision shall not apply to attached Knits on the lot f '�°,
',441`'+'1 line on which the units are attached:
M
vkt y y `,,,
I,,,,' 4. The rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 15 feet. 1r
rt +y 1,v, II
yard »` family attached' r't
:'te P4: residential dwellings abut a more restrictive zoning �,,';'.,
5+ Where the side and or rear yard of single y �
�`'F`�'S�� g than 30 feet. fr
' be less th 3
:; district) such. setbacks shall not e n , ;�,:
t",.,.
s+,,"t !fir
��',;: a: 6. The distance between the property' line and the front of the I r{r
1 ,t'iii-4' garage shall be a minimum of 20 feet r,{
�t �Ye
Gr $ F%
� :; 1.8.54050.;. dimensional Requirements. The minimum setback , A .
rr
requirements for uses irn the R-12 tone shall be. t
r P rY'?
'' ' 1 The fronts yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet.
,1 in 1'+.LL° tyx};
,'S ,'` 2 On corner and through lots) the minimum setback for each i },r
,"' side facing a street shall. be 20 feet, how t '
5t
4 .e: •n it
tt however, t:
i /�
;, ,. provisions of Chapter 18.102 (VISCUAL CLgARAUCE) meat be , ',
t," ,, satisfied, ":,
j'•'''''.• r, 3. The aide yArd setback shall be a minimum of 10 fee �4
•t I
(
rr � sT t C RS C"T - zC 2-84/P0 2 8S/S 11- /V 6.85 - ,H,,,„
I Ar ..,�. � .'.,. I" e. r- ..,.,..r M,11 u, , .,.,..., AI d .. ,,.r. ,.:..;r b rl,,f. .J„f+7.,. �t a o 1 ryt•�+ ,ity,1 1..4 e rr."r"M-0r..;s.:. 7-}t;tddM I. "Irr,C r °;r r ,4,4444„,%.7.;401,,,,,,,,,,,
my'. <Y q l ,, .r ,;fi,r,'I 6, I ,'i z, +, ;;;.4:1.''4',,, 1 '1. rry i s Y
,4
+., r.0 r d I r ^" r ,i[ +z ,w k;;; � > i i, '1 Yq d r 4• w r L,' 4 I01r• r w •'',x,”■ 6
,,
‘6Il
',
4. The rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet.
5. Whe'ce the side yard or rear yard of attached or multiple
r' family dwellings abut a more restrictive zoning district,
such setbacks shall not be less than 30 feet.
•
6. The distance between t;: e property line and the front of the
garage shall be a minimum of 20 feet.
The applicant is requesting a variance approval for front yard
setback, i.e. , to reduce the distance between the property line
and the front of the garage from 20 feet to 18 feet.
Also, the applicant is requesting a variance approval to allow
:• zero lot line single family, detached dwelling units with zero and
10 feet sideyard setbacks in R-12 zoning district (southern >
portion of Phase III). Zero lot line construction in R-7 zoning_
district does not require variance approval.
18.1601120 Criteria for Crantinaa Variance t;
A. The Planning Commission shall consider the application for
an Variance at the same meeting at which it considers the
preliminary plat.
B. A variance may be approved, approved with conditions or
:•'
denied provided the Planning Commission finds:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the
property which are unusual and peculiar to the land as
.., ti
compared tired to other lands similarly situated;
2. The variance is necessary for the proper design or function
of the subdivision,
3. The granting of the variance Will not be detrimental to the
; public health, .:safety and welfare or injurious to the rights
of other owners of property; and
4. The variance is necessary for the preservation and en3oyment
n
of a substantial property right because of an extraordinary
hardship which would result from strict compliance with the
•
regulations of this ordinance.
The lots in the development typically range from 95 to 110 feet in
deth, There appears to be adequate s
p pn ace to meet both the� p
20-foot 20-foot t garage setback without a reduction
in the standards, If the I2 7
E front yard and 20 00
PD zoning approved by the Planning
Co irtisdion in 1981 was still in effect, Zero lot liar~ construction
S would be permit ted,t .ee d The City rezoned a portion of the property to
R-12 in 1983• Although a more appro p riate �rocedure
to allow for
the zero lot line construction would have been to change the
zoning on the R-12 portion to 11, staff can support the intent of
the variance request; The R-'7 toning does allow for zero lot line
construction and the dppltcshts intent is for uniformity
throughout the project>
$TAPP REPORT - ZC 2.84/PO 2=r83/8 11-83/V 6-83 w PAC ll
4
Also, the variance approval to allow zero lot line constructidn in
R-12 is justified on the ground that this portion of the site
(2.49 acres) is very similar in character and topography to the
remainder of the site. It is a portion of the site that would
have access only through portions of the site zoned R-7PD Zero
lot line dwelling units are allowed in R-7PD zones.
The area of the site zoned R-12 is comparatively small. The
proposal allows best design and marketability for the
` development Strict compliance with the regulations disallowing
zero lot line units on the R-12 portion of the site would cause
extraordinary hardship to the applicant by limiting design
compatibility„ efficient use of the land, and anticipated market ,
demand. Based upon these circumstances, the applicant is
requesting a variance to allow practical and complimentary
development of the entire site.
18. 148.03,0 Approval .Criteria and' Conditions
A. The Planning Commission shall approve, approve with
conditions or deny an application for a zero lot line
development based on findings that
1. There shall be a 10 feet separation between each residential
dwelling structure or garage;
2. No residential dwelling g shall be placed on a lot line which
is common to a lot line which is not a part of the Overall
development;
3. No structure shall be placed on a lot line which is common
to a public or 'private road right-of-way or easement line;
4. A five foot non-exclusive maintenance easement shall be
delineated on the plan for each lot having a zero setback
area.
a, This easement shall be on the adjacent lot and shall
` h{ describe the maintenance requirements for the zero lot line
all or deed restrictions must be submitted with the
preliminary plat which address the maintenance requirements
for the zero setback wall of the detached dwellings,
b. The easement shall be recorded with Washington County and
submitted to the City with the recorded final plat prior to
the issuance of any building permits Within the development,
All lots in Phase II and III are to be zero lot line, The
applicant has shown a minimum of 10 feet separation between each
residential dwelling structu ,ey and he has delineated f3.ve feet
non-ekclusive maintenance easements on the betaited Plan for lots
with zero setback area
STA P tlgPO tT 20 2-84/P0 2-85/8 1..1.85/V 6-8J 4- PACE 12
Z.rm+4...•....r ...•v...:+.a+.-r•. .-1-.:,.c.:i.4. .....»...♦ .r.......:: .: ..««.l_._...:...'::....,r :4...._... ��,
C CONCLUSIONS
After reviewing the proposed Conceptual and Detailed Plans, the
preliminary plat and a field investigation, staff finds that the
•
proposed development conforms to all applicable Comprehensive Plan
policies, Community Development Code provisions, and it is compatible
'., with the surrounding land uses.
D. RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends denial of the request for reduction in the front yard ,
setbacks between the property and the front of the garage from 20 feet
to 18 feet.
■
Staff recommends approval of the 7C 2-84, PD 2-83, S 11-83, and the
request for zero lot line construction in an R-12 zone as proposed by
the applicant with the following conditions
/ s Design Review process before
1. The applicant shall apply for a Site DE;s],
any development can occur in Phase IV (towi►houses)
'
2. The storm drainage plan shall conform with the City°s Master
Drainage Plan, and be reviewed and approved by the City's
:yII`
Engineering Division
3 Temporary access onto SW Hall Blvd. (west of the property) shall
be removed within two years from the date of approval.
4. The applicant shall adhere to conditions that will be required by
the State highway Division regarding improvements to frontage and
access onto Hall Blvd.
5. A. nod remonstrance agreement for the future improvetnent on SW Hall
' hind: shall be made a part of the final plat and become a part of
each deed:
rr
6. Seven (7) sets of plan-profile public improvement construction
plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by
a registered civil engineer, detailing all proposed public
improvements' shall be submitted to the City Cityss Engineering Division'
for review.
7 construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence
until after the Engineering Division has issued approved public
improvement plan6. The Engineering Division Wilt require posting '
of a 100 perforr ance bonds the payment of a permit fee, and the
execution of a street i
b enn Permit Opening p or construction compliance
r; •t
agreement just prior toy or at the time of its issuance` of
,approved public improvement plans
8�� :hat., street plugs be installed� �a. ► cessdry to the ,epproVal of
• 'here ne y
the City s Lngineering Division prior to issuance of permLLs.
9. That .sidewalks be located adjacent to the curb
8TA `1 1 U?OI T Zd 2-84/Pb 2-83/g 11.83/V 6-83 PAGl i3
";
.....; r..„....:. . .:...:..: r ,:,:..� .�.;.r, r y-,.r ,,.;:.., a
a fl
1,
.._......+.-+,....,tip,.... ...-...
10. That no parking signs be installed on the west and south side of
SW Fenno Creek Drive.
11. That centerline shall be marked on SW Fanno Cre't.. Drive, 13 feet
off of north and east curbs.
12 A bus shelter shall be provided on SW ball Blvd. with a bus
turnout. A paved walkway shall be provided east to SW Fenno Creek'
Drive. Plans to be submitted to Oregon Department of
Transportation and Public Works Department for approval.
13. Provide a fire hydrant located within 400 feet from all portions
of the building. The hydrant shall be connected to an approved
water supply and shall meet the minimum fire flow requirements.
(UFC 10.3010)
►r
it rr ro
14. Tracts "F and I shall be dedicated to the City prior to the
recording of the final plat with Washington County.
15 That trails in Tracts "For' and "l." shall be built by the
developers, and the cost shall be bonded with the public
improvements.
16. That a covenant creating the. Homeowner's Association be provided
for the maintenance of the play structure on the north side of SW
Fanno Creek Drive. The open space and play structure shall appear
on the final plat.
17. A Homeowner's
`.. f Agreement shall be filed with the City
e"i n
g
per p etual maintenance of all private roads including guaranteeing
ra is A
•
G", and "Hor and the 40 foot private road serving the townhouses
'.. in Phase IV.
18. 18.148.030 Approval Conditions for Zero Lot Line
B. The Planning Commission shall require the following
conditions to be satisfied;
1. Deed restriction +shall be recorded with Washington County
which assure that,
•
a. The 10 feet separation p anon between the residential
•
structures shall remain in perpetuity;
bi The 10 feet separation between the residential
structures shall be maintained free from any
obstructions other than
(1) The eaves of the structure,
(2) A chimney which may 'encroach into the setback area by
not more than 2 feet
STAFki i Ci?o T Zc 2 S4/l'O 83/$ l l..85/V 6'-83 PAOt 14
. ,
(3) A swimming pool;
[
, .
(4) Normal landscaping; or
, (5) A garden wall or fence equipped with a gate for
. emergency access and maintenance purposes; and
2. Easements shall be granted where any portion of the
structure or architectural feature projects over a property
line.
• r.
' 3. The maximum lot coverage for zero lot line shall not exceed ' • '
the maximum lot coverage for the base zone.
19. Survey Conditions:
a. Sheet 2: --
"Vertica Datum" shall be City of Tigard datum (N.G.S. 1929)
..,,
, City bench marks are available along Hall Blvd. ) Bonita Road "
and Ncbonald Street.
b. SIeet 5:
■I■■Ai.............■......
. i o
All storm lines shall be placed in positions that do not
interfere with centerline monumentation. ,.
. C. She 7:
1. Compliance of 18.160.160 (all)
,
Exceptions: A) 18.160.160 A.2.
5/8" X 30" capped iron rods on surface ,
of Final Lift will be acceptable,
. ,
18. 160.160 Monumentaiton) Basis of ..•BearLng Requirements and
.......................................,..* .............*". ,•••■■■•■••••••■••••......................•••.••••••
Acceptanc22SIprovementS
f .
'
A. Nonumentation
I
I,
,
1. In accordance with ORS 92.060 subsection (2) ) the
centerlines of all street and roadway right-of-ways shall be 11
„ MonUmented before the city shall accept a street improvement. i
2. All centerline monuments Shall be placed in A monument box
confortnitig to City standards) and the top of all triortumerit
bokes shall be set at design finish grade of said street or t
roadway,
. ,
3, The following centerline mot Shall be sett
A, All Centerline-centerline ihteeeetiohd,
Intersection6 created with "oolledbor" or othet
existing streets) Shall be set when the denterlifte i. ,.
, aiightsent of said "colleotot" or other stteet had been
estab1iahed by ot for the City
STAPP REPORT - ZC 2-84/PD 2-85/8 1,1-85/V 6-83 - PACE 15
' t
•
•
•
- 1
b. Center of all cul-de-sacs;
c. Curve points. Point of intersection (P.I.) when their ".?r
s inside the limits of the pavement
position falls
otherwise beginning and ending points (B.C. and E.G.)
B. Basis of Bearing
1. The plat shall be tied to a City of Tigard "Primary" or
"Secondary" control station if one exists within 1000 feet
y
of the plat and the bearings oriented thereon.
ii
2. Tigard Grid coordinates for all established boundary points
on the Plat shall be submitted to the City within 15 days of
recording.
,`. 4• 2) Compliance of 1$.164.030 Section H 'Intersection Angles." c
M . , 18.164.030 Streets
H. Intersection Angles. Streets shall be laid out so as to
intersect at an angle as near to a right angle as
practicable, except where topography requires a lesser
angles but in no case shall the angle be less than sixty
•
degrees unless there is special intersection design; and
•
1. Street shall have at least 25 feet of tangent adjacent to
the right-of-way intersection unless topography requires a
lesser distance.
r
2. Intersections which are not at right angles shall have a
minimum corner radius of 20 feet along the right-of-way
lines of the acute angle.
3. Might-of--way lines at intersectir tt with arterial streets
shall have a cornea radius of not less than 20 feet.
20. No changes or modification shall be made to approved plans without
written approval from the appropriate City department:
Record
21. A "Recorded" to tar co
" 15 y copy of final plat shall be submitted to the ..
City within 5 days after recording.
4. .. RECOMMENDED MOTION
Should. , tha Planning Comittxssion, adopt �i e wndin s and
Should staff's findings
recommendations s the foilowi.ng motion may be made. ZC 2 approve as
Mov. t
modified, with conditions, the applicant's request or -84§ PP 2-83
and S 11-S3f and denY V 6'=83"
e41A4ti
PREPAID 13Y. Si
xa "is Pish'vai A RsVEO BY William
Monahan
Assistant Planner biretot of Planning
1
81izabetli A. Newton Deveiopmerit
•
Asodiate Planner
(1w/0305P)`
STAP ' ttCPOttT gC 2-.84/Pb 2-,85/8 11-.85/V 6-85 - PACE 16
i
•
1
' rr'Q,..'.n .'C. �h.. h� t f�44 a' �. ' ( /•
' , 1 .Gar 0.4 w u
0 ((•••,,, \\ 0
•
Es a, 0) •
'
�� Y •
PUBLIC HEARINGS
following will be considered by the Tigard Planning Commission on
•• February 21 1984 at 7:30 P , at Howler Junior High School Lecture Room, g, ••
10865 SW Walnut, Tigard,Oregon.Further information may be obtained from
the Director of Planning and Development at 12755 SW Ash Ave., Tigard,
Oregon 97223 or by calling 639-4171. •
Study session between Planning Commission and NPO's.
•
VARIANCE V 1.84 BOND PARK II and BOND PARK III NPO#5
A request by Waverly Construction Co.for a variance to city standards to
allow sidewalks on only one side of the interior streets of Bond Park II
and III. The applicant also requests a variance from the setback stand-
ards for an R-12 zone to allow 18 foot garage setbacks, 10 foot street side
yards, 4 foot interior side yards,and 15 foot rear yards.The property is
• designated medium density residential and is zoned R-12. Located at:
Between SW 79th and SW 81st, north of Durham Road. (Wash. Co. Tax
Map 2S1 12CC lots 100,1900,2000,and 2S1 12CD lot 1600).
PLANNED
Enterprises,Inc,NPO#'7 •'
AI equeest for conceptUal plan approval for Rosebud 34 single family zero lot line
dwelling units on 7.31 acres.The property is designated Medium D6dsity
•, r Residential and Open Space.It IS zoned R-7PD.Located at:SW 106W Ave
„ and SW Black Diamond Way. (Wash.Co.Tax Map 1S1 34AD lot 7600).
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PD 3.84
SUBDIVISION S 11.83
• ZONE VARIANCE V G-8 C,2-���� '
`4 3'Cotony Creek Estates II,III,IV NPO#
A request by Titan Properties for a zone change from R-12 to R-12
Planned Development (PD) for a 2.49 acre parcel.Also,a request for a
•
conceptual and detailed plan approval of a Planned Development as well
as preliminary plat approval on 15.27 acres,A variance to allow zero lot
line construction in the R-12 zone,plus a reduction in the garage setback
frorr 20 to 18 feet.The property is designated medium density residential
and
Creek Drive WaFCo�Tax 1tila. 2S1 1213�t:lots 100, Blvd and SW
( p , 101,3400, 3601,3700
and 4300)
• 176320 Publish February 9,1984
•
•
•
•
•
•
•; m
a
ti.•
y'
•
•
,
Ji.'
♦,..
calf OF TaGAR® 11420 S,VR/,i�lIANN—TICA�2 ,OREt9F 922 ,
RECEIPT
DAT ; -- ,AMOUNT;$;
75. . '
;i
r --
NAM ; - CASH; f
ADDRESS; � tl e
A
:
Poiti. ACCT. # P RAdi TS , StURCHARGE AMOUNT
SEWER BILLINGS 40-364' $ :._.
BUSINESS LICENSE 05-331
PLUMBING PERMIT 05-332
•
MECHANICAL PERMIT 05=33
2
BUILDING 'ERMIT 05333
SEWER CONNECTION 40-363
SEWER INSPECTION 40-365
. SYSTEM bEV,CHARGE 25-366 _
I •
PARK DEV,CHARGE•#1 30-367 •..6
r. PARK DEV,CHARGE#2 30-36a ._
ZONING ADJUSTMENTS 05.362
,
I
TOTALS $...� $_7 •
RECEIVED EYI
PE IMio 14UMI3 RS AS i NED
Nuntbar Amount ,Nu'Iber Ahltstiht Nahibor AinotihL
, , 1 10 6 6 9 -
•
}
.' •
'.,.•n.,. ., ,,.urn,. ,,.. ,- g V ,,, •
a.
. , ,. ,
,. , e
Iii. EcE1VEND
4�
JAN ; '1 1, 84
CITY OF TMARD
, C ;))) (gDft DAVID EVF)(13 Ar'it) F1330CIATE3,, Inc. ' :.;,,' '
2626 3111 COF2BETT Fiven E • PORTLAf1D,oiztcon 97201 • 6O3>223•6665 .
January 31, 1984 File 'No. 1'11'002
S. ai Pishri Assistant Planner
City of Tigard Planning Department
City of Tigard
',,. 12755 S.W. Ash
9 r
Tigard, Oregon 97223 ,•
•Dear Mr. Pishraie;
yll
This narrative description accompanies our application for a
one change from R-12 to R-12 PD on TL 3700, 2 S 1, Sec. 12 , . '
in conjunction with our general application and supplemental '
' applications for approval to develop Phases II, , III and ZV
of Colony Creek Estates.
Most of the 15. 27 acre development site, (12. 78 acres
) is
,. already designated Planned Development, specifically R"7 PD.
A small portion of the site (TL 3700, co1xtprised of 2. 45 acres)
is designated R-12. The applicant requests that thi portion
of the site also be designated Planned Development.
This change is requested for a small portion of the site in
rd 'o d provide i layout of the entire
order to rov:�de consistent and.. efficient
ppse development. The portion of the site zoned R-12 is
vex similar in character and topography to the remainder of
the site. It is a portion of the site that would have access
;�� only through portions of the site already zoned Planned Dever
opment (A7-PD) , 4
lihatik n this request. If we can be of further
Y 9 eq ��
ass stanceforxeaseegive me a call.
n g I
Very truly yours y
DAVID EVAN N8 AND ASSOCIATES INC ..
Mel stout
,,
:me
b
,,.,.M .•..,..-.....,...mss.:.:.........._.i..,._. ,1::,,,-...-.+a.,,... . .-... , ..... _
v-
(T•
PROPERTIES CORPORATION'
•
December 16,E 1983
City of Tigard
Planning Department
P 0 Box 23397
Tigard, Oregon 97223
•
Gentlemen
In 1981 Titan Properties Corporation purchased the property
identified as tax lots 3400 3601, 4300, 101 and 100. The
i
purchase was made via a land sales contract.
•
In 1983 Titan obtained an option to purchase tax lot 3700.
The ro ert either purchased or under option to purchase P P Y �P ro . erty property option p
constitutes the subject to be platted.
Very truly yours,
TITAN PROPERTIES CORPORATION
g .
S r'ephen A. Bleak
President
SAB/plf
ti
•
•
•
i C'1 Nb1= HEAD Iy t RNCLL ROAb/HILL8EsbRb bt,ltjbN 0,/ttLEI 1-1bN tbda9 is ci.so0
' �..n......,w..w�.-...-,.....+, liw�. -v-.�x.i.-,v...._.......�.-.,;.,...�r-wrx,..-:�.,M..�.m1,.n�...4..,,wF,-+:..,�F..n .......,...t:..............,;;-:... ..a.,.r:.: F«.,._..�_ -...•...., n .:r....�.e...-.w.,.�. _-_.. , ......,. ....,..-._a.. .,.e......_4;..._.t T.,.... .,.. ...,....I:.M,-.,....,+.t,!•-...-. -,+.v1,-..,.....-.r�.rlti.-.,vC'A�4:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
is ,vt. ..�e r..:tG!. �y"+e. '•�'
• REIVMITTANCE ADVICE
PIROPEATIES CORPORATION
N.S, COENELL RCS, 640.6086
HILLSEORO,OR 97123 VENDOR: •
' ANSACTION DATE REFERENCE GROSS'AMOUNT .�.' DEIbUCTION , NET AMOUNT 'r •
•
5180 750. 00 . .
„V".
Colony Creel
•
•
•
•
•
r •
CF-JEGI DATE CHECK NO, TOTAL"GROS.S LI , TOTAL DEDUCTION ... CHECK A MOUNT
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
r,:,.,.;: . ,
�
,:•: ,,.' ,., .xu, .eau •
.. :.;; IMrr Awn�19 n1N al�'u r.w rN Arcot xF.+Al•i•¥FS+Y WNICNB tuuyA lMMi"Y'1�7np F�. �`•' r r.`w' •ier.:,.;9.. ��;I"'}•'3
•
i
.r�. ,t.v !' - "�+ ',,r''„ wi"wln �+ +�k'IAte` A kA .w 1. A 7 ,J! "4 5 y+A 1 '.w.w,
+ 4 1;t*�" �......- r 6� �; !!,'�,� Y� ' ..'^'Rid y A 1'y fir•
I a at'1A'�C \I S ,�.. �! ,. s �'«. a�ii. A
.0
pry .. b e! /^1 C.. /"�GENERAL APPLICATION FORM 1 ' ' ,ASE No � Q``
,f.,:,-')CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 - \`' RECEIPT No.
Tigard, Oregon 97223 -- (503)639-4171 a, 1,
44.4.44444.41 4444.4444.44444.44.44.4444a.4444.4.4.44.444.44.44.44.4.444.44r4.44.4•
\Gg9V
riD q
1. GENERAL INFORMATION' ' , FOR STAFF USE ONLY
,, l
P ROPERTY-ADDRESS ' '\j 4,1 0,° : Associated Cases a
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
INTERNAL PROCESSING:
SITE SIZE
Z'A9- Q '7 OJ Accepted for Pre-App. :
PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER*......_.._.L._:._��d" 26.1** 1 By:
ADDRESS S'Z' 6 - PIJONE "
'�-rr- Pre-App •
CITY Z(� ;�f3 ZTP
APPLICANT 7 Date & Times
�k 1 •j r
ADDRESS
` PHONE - _
T — Accepter:
for Decision:
CITY ZIP
N. Where the owner and the applicant are different people, the By:
applicant tnUst be the purchaser of record or a leasee in
Hearing Date:
possession with written authorization from the owner or an
agent The written of the owner with written authorization: Bearing Reset Tot
authorization must be submitted with this application.
2. REQUIRED LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION IS ATIACHEll,' YES 0 NO., ;
Decision: filed & mailed ,
• ; '3. THIS APPLICATION ,INVOLVES,.THE.,FOLLOWING: APP.
Accepted for Appeal:"
FEE • FILED PAID._. 1
Comprehensive Plan Amendment r- _
from to
quasi-judicial
,� Date of Hearing:
leg�.s la .
Zone Change from to j'..
• g f��l �I��`
quasi-judicial
legislative s. DESCRIPTIONS
Planned Unit DeVelopme t _ ____ `" Comp. Plan Designation:
concept plan detailed plan
SUbdivision NPO No
Major Partition
} Minor Partition Zoning District
Des Review ,
_ Conditional ,�
_______. _. .
ditional Use Zoning Map No.
• Variance to Zoning
Variance t.. y E Ord finance ,. ..
(Title 18) Quarter Section No:
Variance to Subdivision Ord
�
'` (Title /7
.
Sonsitive Land Permit "-.... —
''~-~=------ STAFF NO'1ES.
Fl.00dplains
brainageways
Steep Slopes
i 0th
ex
1
T0z'AL
y
•
V ua_'aial1_11`12. .7,S. a a'a:.artaai"£K' `�!'i ilii a e y asymf u t
CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397
Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503)639-4171
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (TO BE PROVIDED BY APPLICANT, FOR STAFF USE ONL
Notice of Response
4. DISTRICTS A... end:
'es o Yes_`
SCHOOL DISTRICTi 'D [)Ii,
WATER DISTRICT. - ' opt 'Lls , 'NM
FIRE DISTRICT — � .�. "-�' � 1�I�'� � .+
PARK DISTRICT 0: `111t(Z
UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY—Sewer Available: YES NO EMI
OTHER
5. PUBLIC UTILITIES
ELECTRICITY
NATURAL GAS k.,46.#4: A *7, PSC
TELEPHONE_._ 4"76 e---+ 'l.. ''Tf-1,.. ,.�, a 0)_P
OTHER
6. PUBLIC TRANSIT (TRI MET)
• 1VEAREST BUS ROUTE AND STOP 1
A
7. OTHER INTERESTED AGENCIES (SPECIFY)
MN • —
, 8 CHARACTER OF THE AREA
EXISTING LAND USE PLAN DES]:GNATION ZONE '�ERIFxGD BY' STAFF
EXIST
NORTH � k 1
R '
•
SOUTt \/ 1 ' I ,
CAST ` c- f 014 •
-1
•
•
•. d
•
GENERAL APPLICATION FORS.. PAGE 3 a CASE, No. M.•a,
CITY OF V'1°A,RD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397
Tigard,;Jr, on 97223 (503)639-4171
9. CHANGES IN THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA. WHICH AFFECT THIS APPLICATION. Please Discuss s
pck a tate oveita. cotAt4kit y .
a0
• I 1
•
10. DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE
Lot Area (acres;, square feet) 2.?� ,� :.,_
11. EXISTING STRUCTURES ON THE SITE
Square Distance From Property`Line
Use ..w Feet North S outh East Wes t
tf
n l �' ' ' X2.0 ` 6'
pp
get) 'G"� i 4 is 6�d{
•
NATURAL CONDITIONS
12. Percent S lope
13. Vegetation Types Average Diame ter Percent Of Each
Yes No Site Of Trees Per Size_
_227:
Trees:
brush
Grasso
14 Floodplains iiow much of the bite is in f1oodplain7_
15. Water Courses What type?
16. Rock Outcroppings
1y Other:
18. Px'n ,secs Development: lease briefly desc�:��,
pr• p y s d de�'elo.ment: • !
� e the ropo. � -� �� � .
11 I► + ,��.! ' ,.+... ,�►.�. ri N .A r .. r , 1 '.►
w i r
•
r
GENERAL APPLICATION FOR PAGE 4 CASE No.
- CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397
:.1e Tigard, Oregon 97223 W (503)639-417
19. The following is y is not required.''
20. Overall Site Development ,
Residential Commercial industrial en 5 pdce Other Roads Total . ck
No of acres
or square
feet per use
Percent of
si,,te
co era•e
21. Type of Residential Use and Characteristics
11 of Bedrooms/Unit -
.e of Use'M, ,, it', of Units BIM 4 Density Eb'F, _. _.. Pro•osed Bensit _.no
......
.. _ ..
.. Mill Mil.22. Where applicable , please explain how the open space, common areas and recreational
facilities will be maintained.\,, 1 ,
6 r _0\611,,. c-,)- - ie. e . 162),
1), ,..
p
R .. .
Project completed P , P
23. If the ro ecr �.s to be cotri feted in �"uses lease describe each phase of the projeot
A r
", .. ,,,.2 ‘ \'' t:'`)4 16(326151/\'' '''‘ ' 'WI, 0' 6 II-, 1"-KL , .
\ t '
Please stibtnit the following With this application
1 Written General Narrative, ntintber as rec t ired by Planning Department
2, Proof of O 'nership ,.
3. Letter of aUthorikation if applicant 1.8 not Omer
4. fax Map : .6s
•
Staff will iddhtify for youp wheth r this section is to bP cotpletedk
,:
ta
GENERAL APPLICATION FORT.-- PAGE. 5 ', CASE No. '1
CITY OF 'TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397
Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503)639-417]
THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE, AS REQUESTED' BY THE APPLICANT, SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF EACH HEARING.
(e.g. Attorney, Surveyor, Engineer) 1 .,
Staff Notice
Notice Report Decision , of Review
-" � •Name ` .� , .�. • it,�Ld' 4 .,,.,.,. ..,, A ,t,...
4.Street .' i A ,*.; :..;
Cit Zp6 .7
, •
:', ; .' ;,•Name �,...._._ • .
Street: ' o 0 . K ` `` X *11.'
s ,
State ' Zip �►•C2 ty r,se1
Name
''
Street
Gib
State Lip
Name
Street
• State Zip � ��,
City - '
APPLICANT
�, 1
OWNER
S - 4
•
,,
•
A
,•i
COLONY CREEK ESTATES •
PHASE II, III & IV
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
DECEMBER 19 8 3
•
•
•
•
Prepared for the Applicant:
TITAN PROPERTIES CORPORATION
2201 N.E CORNELL ROAD
HILLSBORCO, OREGON 97123
(503) 640-6086
.
Prepare. by
DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
2PORTLAND COREGON 97201
r
(! 03) 223a-6663
■
fF i uY iJ! 1 SN' i
it
•
rI
•
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION NATURE OF THE REQUEST
PREVIOUS ACTION
DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE
• PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
•
VICINITY
SITE CHARACTERISTICS
SURROUNDING LAND USE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION
ZONING DESIGNATION
ACCESS
SERVICES
SCHOOLS
TRANSIT
FIRE PROTECTION
•
POLICE PROTECTION •
•
FLOODPLAIN
STEEP SLOPES
SOILS
III. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
e, • Y MM: , M M. YYa 1 pU o,w i.M Y••y. u,.:
PLAN DESCRIPTION
CONDITIONS,
COVENANTS
AND RESTRICTIONS
OPEN SPACE
•, VARIANCE REQUESTS
• DENSITY COMPUTATIONS
CONFORMANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
HARMONY WITH SURROUNDING AREA
PLANNED' DEVELOPMENT BENEFICIAL EFFECT
COMPLIANCE WITH STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS
IV. APPENDIX
PROP ,
•' ER�I,'Y OWNERSHIP WITHIN 260 'FT
OWNERSHIP LETTER
EIRE MARSHAL LETTER
SCHOOL LETTER
GENERAL APPLICATION FORM
SITE PLAN CHECK LIST
SITE DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS FORM
DENSITY CALCULATION VoRM
•
ti
�'
I INTRODUCTION NATURE OF THE REQUEST
This narrative report is provided to supplement the standard
General Application and Planned Development Supplemental Forms
submitted requesting approval for .Phase II, III and IV of Colony
Creek Estates. Phase I was previously approved and is currently
nearly built out.
The applicant, Titan. Properties, requests the following
,r 1,
concurrent approvals in accordance with Chapter 18. 80, Planned
Development, of the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan:
1. Approval for Planned Development Overlay Zone over
the entire site, Most of the 15.27 acre site (12. 78 acres)
is already designated Planned Development, specifically
R-7P.D.
A small portion of the site (2. 49 acres) is designated R--12.
The applicant requests that this portion of the site, which is
TL 3700 Sec. 12, T2S, R1W, W.M. , also be designated Planned
( Development.
2. General Plan approval- . and Conce,. �• p tuai Plan a...pp roves l for
.
a planned development of 67 single-family dwelling units and 34 3 ..
multifamily townhouse dwelling units on the 15. 27 acre site. a
for the single-family D ailed Development Plan (Prelima:nary'awPlat).°°`'approdalM
3. Detailed
lots , Colony Creek
Lots Phases IT. and III of Colon Cree
Estates. Phase IV consists of the proposed townhouse area of
the site.
•
4. Variance approval to build Zero lot line single--family,
detached dwelling units with zero and 10 ft. sideyard setbacks.
,
5. Variance approval for front setback, ` stance
between the property line. and the front se�-back the di
PP
P p,, y the h ront of the garage, of a
minimum 18 feet instead of
e equired 20 feet.
PREVIOUS ACTION - On May l24 1978 the City reoeived an appli
cation for a Preliminary Plan 1 -7PD for Phase Il (4Q single-family
t
lots) and Phase III (34 townhouse units) The a"Pp ly cation was
app..... roved
•
' .+.:.: ...r..Am...-.s�n.:....Jr.M.w.../M.....,.;:.�;,...aa., W_:.:,... -.,w:,..... ..-..,, .........:......... , .:..,. .. +dk,� .. _...._«., ............ J... .. .k.,»x.....a.::........ ..A.,-.r.,tl.. _ m
• •
INTRODUCTION, cont.
PREVIOUS ACTION Cont.
The project was not built. g ownership new
It changed ownershi and a
. application (same plan) was reviewed and approved May 5, 1981.
The project was not built due to the decline in the housing mar- r '
ket.
THE CURRENT APPLICATION IS ESSENTIALLY THE SAME PROPOSAL
WITH THE ADDITION OF TL 3700 (2. 49 ACRES) AND THE CONSEQUENT
REALIGNMENT OF STREETS AND THE SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS. THE TOWN-
HOUSE AREA REMAINS UNCHANGED.
q Conceptual approval only q ,,. .
Consequently, Conce tua� Plana rova� should onl require
•
review of the minor changes in .the previously approved plans
for Colony Creek Estates.
DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE - The applicant desires the requested
approvals in order to begin construction in the 1
pp in g' 984 building
season. Based upon current information, the applicant feels that
the housing market beyond 1984 is unknown. Consequently, ti,t is
.• ' essential for the success of-the project that approvals for de-
velopment of the single-family lots be gained before the 1984
building season.
PRE=APPLICATION CONFERENCE - A pre-application aonferenoe
Was held With Hamid Dishra; e, the applicant, and the applicant' s
representatives on November 7 , 1983. The City' s files regarding
previous actions on the site were re'v'iewed along with a sketch plan '
of the layout for the Current proposal. Allowed density, or total
number of units, Was determined by Mr: Di8'raie
.. to be 101 uhits
II e EXISTING CONDITIONS
VIdINIt"?
• - The site is tiocated riorth and east of u.W, Bbnta
{
' y
EXISTING CONDITIONS, cont.
VICINITY, cont.
Road and S.W. Hall Boulevard. It can be reached from Hall
Boulevard, Colony Creek Court and Fanno Creek Drive. It in.
cludes TL 3400, 3601, 3700, 4300, 100 and 101 of the N.W. 1
Of the N.W. ki of Sec 12 , T2S, R1W, W.M. Washington County,
Oregon.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS - The land generally slopes east from
S.W. kiall Boulevard at a rude of a
g • approximately two tO five
percent. The elevation along S.W. Hall Boulevard is approximately
180. The elevation drops to 150 near where
,., p proposed Fanno Creek
Drive meets the property boundary on the east.
+'
p P Y Y
The major physical characteristic is Fanno Creek which runs
r
through the northeast corner of the site. Bann. Creek serves
- as the collector of strom drainage from this area. An additional
local drainageway traverses through the southwestern cornerof
the property. These two corners of the property contain floodway
or lands over 25% in slope. Development is root
p p proposed in
these areas. . .,...
SURROUNDING LAND USE -- The Site is surrounded by residential
land use except for the land adjacent to the very northeast cor-
ner Of the site, which is planned for light industrial development.
• This land is located across Panto Creek from the site. B fisting
residential development north (Phase I of Colony Creek Estates) 4
and east (Waverl y
Meadows) of the site includes both attached
and detached dwellin g units. Most of the residential develop- 1,
ment west and south of the site consists of single'-famiy cle-
tached homes,
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION The Site arid Surrounding ={F}
areas e .cept for near the southwest corner of the Site is designate
._ .-..,,..}a,.... .k.....::..,„. .,......;;..-...•J...,.:.:..... .....,.....-. ::.....;,... „m....... .... _,_.... .._..IL,_. .._._ .. .__.... i..,. .,._. •w..,»..a..._.. ..__.....,.,,_.....-....
•
EXISTING CONDITIONS , cont.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION, cont.
•
ted Medium Density Residential. Land south and west of the
• Medium De
site is designated Low Density Residential. Density �..,
Residential areas are planned for 6 to 12 'units per acre. The
site north of Fanno Creek is 'designated Open Space.
•
F•' ZONING DESIGNATION - Most of the site is designated R-7PD.
Approximately 21 acres of the site is designated R-12. H .
ACCESS - Interim access to the site is proposed off S.W.
Hall Boulevard. As part of previous general plan approval for
the area, permanent access for the site will be prdvided
through extension and connection of Fanno Creek Drive. Fanno ►
Creek Drive is expected to eventually connect to S .W. Hall
Boulevard northwest of the site. Faring Creek Drive connects
to S.W. Bonita Road southeast of the site.
el
•
SERVICES - Sewage collection and treatment is available
to the site from the City of Tigard through an agreement With
the Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County. Collection
is provided by means of sewer mains located adjacent to the site
which flow into the Fanno Creek Interceptor located to the north- •
east. The Durham Treatment Plant provides treatment for sewage
from this basin.
The Tigard Water District provides Water supply for the area.
• ' Water mains exist adjacent to the site an Phase I of Colony Creek •
Estates and in Waverly MeadoWS
Storm runoff will be routed' through a formal drainage.• ...
• System. u •
built to City Standards Storm drainage Will outlet into Fanno
Creek through a formal Stor n drain system.
•
4
' 4
I,: 1
•, y
ir
•
, k.
• .r.«i,,,.nu,.,.,r...... .,.... ryi t.+ wa.—.,...t.......I,',...x.mL 1 - nr.N,e.,.+..wo--._.L,...,...,...: 1 \..... ;.,.....+-.-«.,...:........ ...................r.,J...,.«« .....,_.«, .,,.....n ,.... ,..,.....-. .. .._.... ...
EXISTING CONDITIONS, cone.
SCHOOLS - The property is located in Tigard School District
23J. Nearby schools include James Templeton Elementary, Durham
Elementary, Tuality Junior High and Tigard High.
•
TRANSIT - Tri-Met bus line , 43 services the site. The line
runs along S.W. Hall Boulevard adjacent to the site.
FIRE PROTECTION - The site is served by the Tualatin Rural
r Fire-'Department
POLICE PROTECTION The site is served by the Tigard Police
Department.
FLOODPLAIN At the northeast corner of the site a small
rectangular portion of the site extends north. Fanno Creek flows
through that area. In that area the portion of the site below
elevation 140 is considered to be in the Fanno Creek floodplain.
STEEP
EP SLOPES -- Some. -areas in both. the northeast and south- •
east portions of the site contain slopes over 25%. 'These areas
ate portions of the site that are most suitable for open space.
No development iS proposed for these areas.
' r
SOILS - Soil types found on the site and their Character-, „,.
s r
is tics are sho'4 n in Table 1 and Can the accompanying ng site analysis
map.
•
,
atif)
TABLE 1
Classification* Soil Type and Characteristics
30 McBee silty clay loam, nearly level
Used for timber, pasture, recreation
Runoff slow
Flooding is frequent
Erosion hazard light
Permeability is moderate
37A Quatama loam, 0 - 3 percent slope
Used for agricultural crops
Runoff slow
•
Erosion hazard light
'ugh fertility
Permeability is moderately slow •
37B Quatama loam, 3 - 7' percent slope
Used for agricultural crops
Runoff sloW
Erosion hazard light
High fertility
Permeability is moderately slow
46F Xerochrepts and Haploxerolls, very steep
•
Used for pasture, recreation, hoMesites
Well drained
Erosion hazard Severe
PermeabilitY is moderate
*ClaSsifiCation and characteristics as described in Soil SUrveY
O Washingtoh County; United State Department of AgriCUlture
Soil Conservation Servide in cooperation with Oregon Agticilltur-
,
al txPeriment Station issued Jul , 1982.
, 63
•
III. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
PLAN DESCRIPTION - The proposal consists of development
of 67 single-family, detached dwelling units and 34 multi-
family townhouse units.
Access is gained off S.W. Hail Boulevard via Colony Creek ;,.
Court and S.W. Fanno Creek Drive from the northwest and off S.W.
Bonita Road via S.W. Fanno Creek Drive from the southeast. In--
terior circulation is shown on the accompanying Conceptual De-
velopment Plan. Streets are proposed to be public with right-
of- way widths of 50 feet.
The development has been designed to compliment existing
adjacent land uses and physical conditions. Single-family, de-
tached dwelling Units are planned for the southern and western
a .,
portions of the site. Townhouse units are proposed for the
northeast corner of the site adjacent to the proposed Fanno
Creek open space area. The units will be surrounded by open
space on the north and west and Fanno Creek Drive on the south.
On the east the townhouse units will abut an open sp ace tract
in Waverly Meadows which will separate the proposed townhouse
units from the existing multifamily attached Units in Waverly
Meadows.
Several tracts are proposed in the development plan, most
of which are reserved for access or open space. Tract 'A' and
Tract 'C' are proposed 5' dedications to increase the right-of'-
way width of S.W. Hall Boulevard. Tract 'B' i5 •proposed p p as a
p � provide access to adjacent pro-
posed
30 foot wide x�.vate drive to accesS
dwelling units Tract 'D' is proposed to be traded for
temporary acceSS to Phase it of the development. By agreement with
the owners of TL 3,02, the applicant would build a temporary 26 foot
wide paved roadway, as shown on the Conceptual, Development Plan,
•
A
. w
{
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL, cont
b
•
PLAN DESCRIPTION, Cont.
,.
Tract 'D' would be traded to the owner of TL 102. The portion of
the roadway through Lot 58 would be removed upon completion of
Phase z'I and III. Tract •'En is Proposed to - '� .
p p provide access to Mr.
Cash's lot" , T.L. 4400 , 2Sl, Sec. 12. Tract 'r' is proposed as r,
a large open space area with access from Fanno Creek Drive.
a r ' p p. s ,•'I
'.." Tract G and °H° are x•o o.�ed Private drives. to serve the
adjacent proposed townhouse units. Tract ' I' is proposed as
a large open space tract with access from Fanno Creek Drive and
Tract 'G' .
t ,
Tracts 'A' 'C' , 'F' , and ' I' are proposed to be dedicated
to the City of Tigard. Tracts 'B' , 'G' and 'H° will be main-
tained by the homeowners association. Tract 'E' is proposed to
a, .
be sold to Mr. Cash
The project has been designed to save as r arx of the large
trees in the site as is practical. Special precaution is Pro's' L.,.
p g p
bsed dura.n construction to protect trees that will remain.
See the accompanying aerial photo--plan overlay which Shows exist-
ing trees. Based upon surveying and final plat adjustment the
minimal number of trees will need to be removed for development
purposes.
All proposed utilities are to be placed underground. ll
streets and parking areas are proposed to be Concrete or asphalt.
All sidewalks are ro p osed
All p p to �e conorete. Pedes•�ra.an paths are
proposed to be asphalts
CONDtTION5, COVENANTS AND 'RESTRICT. CN
S (CC&A s)
The CC&R°S proposed for Phase 11 and III of the project
• are those on file with the City and used for Phase .
•
N.,. ,...r•.«a+'.»w.. ,.r.,f,•.w.. .... .a.v....,...a.., .4 � ... r.em, Ito„ r t ,.. << ,,,z., ,tli.:.t F 1:°,r .,
•
o•
• ' .. ,..- ... .-._ •.n,...t... .w+..... ............ ...n .tea_ t .1 ..._ ..a s.f...,. r.t xxlV...4,.._ J. .r.r., ..a ..
rh.m.wti..n...w-...........,......d1..ri-.r...._..rt-m.......4.:..,. ._.-...... _._....u.««..:'.•..arr.....'.1....Y-...A....-... _... . .. ........ ....:... ...,-
PLANNED DEVEL(51/4 ENT PROPOSAL, cont.
CONDITIONS, COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS cont. `..
The CC&R' s will be refined or use for Phase IV as appropriate
upon application for Detailed Development Plan approval for
Phase IV.
1 1..
OPEN SPACE - More than two acres of the site are desig-
mated o p en space. In the northeast c orner of
the site alon g
Fanno Creek approximately 1.5 acres of the site is planned
for open space. This open space area includes a corridor
designed to accommodate a pedestrian path providing access'
from S.W. Fanno Creek Drive to the open space area. The open •
space along the creek is considered part of the Fanno Creek
Greenw'Iy.
•
At the southeast corner of the site an approximate . 75
acre area is planned for open space. It is designed with access
to the street.
Both of these areas are proposed to be dedicated to the '
City of Tigard for public recreation use. See the accompanying
landscape plan showing proposed recreation facilities.
•
"Bi g Toys" type la structure and associated
Y " yp play�' picnic
tables and bences are proposed to be provided in the'' initial
phase (Phase II of Colony Creek Estates) of development. see
the accompanying phasing plan.
With the trails , picnic tables, benched and play equipment
proposed, less than normally expected additional use of existing
City park facilities is anticipated. Additional impact on exist-
ing City facilities is likely to be limited to use of facilities
of Cit
y.wide or regional attractictin� Local daily play-'type
activity is expected to reit►ain Within the development
„ _1.1......l x.a.+r..wu..w.vn.n.v!.tirn.+....r..a:m,+..: •r....'n.l.....e.rd
_ ......aa..... ..........♦ ,..r.............,m...,1..,.v.,.:..,.0.....-.-..:.i•,. .:.;:,1:..x ...,_....:.....-.- .::..:,.........-,.t.J...L, •«_,::__..,-...-a._...w...........la,-..:....« ..-.._.. ..14... ... ......-..+ .+.s:A..r«,........J,- .t
•
PLANNED DEVELOPkiNT PROPOSAL, cont.
VARIANCE REQUESTS - Two variances are being requested:
one for development of zero lot lines construction of dwelling Y
units, and one for 18 feet front yard setback, instead of the
required 20 feet distance between the property line and the
front of the garage.
zero lot line construction, is desirable in order to , •
„ , g reatl y imp r ove side and usability. The applicant cant requests H .
zero setback one side and a minimum 10 feet setback on the
opposite side of, a single-family, detached dwelling unit.
This arrangement is Proposed for Phase II and III but not for
every lot. All lots would be developed with single-family,
•
detached homes.
Because of smaller vehicle sizes and in the interest of
land use economy, the applicant requests the reduced front yy ard
setback between property line and garage from 20 to 18 feet. ''
Sidewalks aru proposed to be located adjacent to t he curb.
This will generate a more massive effect of front yard lands-
r
caging and allow adequate room for pedestrian. circulation. S a
•
DENSITY COMPUTATIONS '
Table 2 shows density computations
for the site per Chapter 18. 92 of the Comprehensive Plan,
}_. ,..w.e ..-,.. . ... �d ..,+.M. 5 •',`.-Its j+l
., .• ”„ 11 Ya,s•.r nMwrh vYK.Y A .1
,
4a
i
1 .....,i.......n. �+n.n4..mK^wx....r..«,.rr.M. r..............a.�..,...+}rl..,. .......�...�..«r.,... .,,,... _...._..rte ..1.,.«.-., 1 .._._._.,«..,.... , ..,...
Y
TABLE 2 ,.,.
Density Computations
r
Sensitive Lands
Floodway 58,900 sq. ft.
DrainagewaY
10 ,000 sq. ft.
ti "
Steep Slopes 19,600 sq. ft. w
Subtotal•" 88,500 sq. ft.
Dedications (S.W. Hall Blvd. ) 405 sq. ft.
Public and Private Streets
121,096 sq. ft.
Total 210 ,001 sq.ft.'
Gross Site Area = 665 ,161 sq. ft.
•
455 160 sq. ft.
Net Site Area = q
84% of site ,
R--7 Site Area 382 ,334 sq. ft.q
R-12 Site Area = .
72 ,825 s . ft. = 16% of site = 1. 67 Acres
3 ' units .,
82 , 334 (R--7) 5,000 sq. ft. /lot
76
2, units ";.
1. 67 Acres (R-12) x 12 units/acre = 0
Subtotal 9.6 units
' Density transfer - 25% of 88 ,500 sq. ft. 22 ,125 sq.
ft.
: , - ,,_ ; . ... .
84% (R-7) of 22 ,125 18,585 5,000
= 4 u nits
stO 16% (K-12) of 22,125 3,540
.08 aC. x 12 1 Unit
• Subtotal 5 units
y
TOTAL 101 '.nits
n.
i
w
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL, cont.
CONFORMANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed de-
velopment complies with the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan .
•
in the following manner.
• 1. The proposal complies with the current zoning for
the site. Portions of the site are designated "R-7PD and R-12
The site is designated Medium in the Comprehensive Plan
2. The proposal complies with the NPO #5 Urban Medium-
Density Residential Policies.
r 3. The proposal complies with the purposes of the Sub-
division Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan.
o The proposed development will help implement the
Comprehensive Plan.
o The proposal will be developed in accordance with
the rules , regulations and standards governing the
•
approval of plats of subdivisions.
o The proposed development will carry out the de-
velopment pattern and plan of ,the City
o The proposal will promote the public health, safety
and general welfare of the City by providing living
units built to comply with City standards and Codes
o The street system designed for the proposal provides
for initial f development of
• and uture a comprehen-
sive
neighborhood circulation system. With adcbmpany`'
ing sanitary and storm sewers these systems Will al-
• leviate potential cong estion and provide safety from
fire, flood.r pollution ollutio and other dangers.ers.
•
o The above provisions and the design layout of the
o
,.,
proposal insure adequate light and air, Prevent
overcrowding of land and provide, f aoilities adequate
for provision of transportation, Water supply, sewage .'
disposal and drainage,
-.. .... ..;..Y. L_..v1...ro7..,Ewa.„q.r...wwr,Haaaarr..zEra r w,Yla,V.Ntr•?ryL'gtiu5?-4riyMfNw ,t'::'
.^IrNan.
•,.«m,+..iw........r.nw._........Mrs,\A..,.+...Sr n.-..,:.d....-.-.......-..«-G.. ,.,. ....,-...:..+I..+.«... ..ri.......w..aw,.,.h....,. ........:.. ...J s ,s..._. .-. .....,-?a.., -._ 4.«.. ., e..Ai..e..-'.Y.:,, .. .. .i.1.+. :...1-:.P.
..,'...' .204 . ( ( '': .''''.':.
: :: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL, cont :
", . CONFORMANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, cont. '
•
4: 0 The proposed development encourages conservation
.
of energy resources through development of the al--
fi
,
owble density, and throu g h ener gy savings realized
in development of attached dwelling units.
• {
4. The proposal complies with the purposes of the Planned
Development Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. .:•.
o The design for the proposed development utilizes the
flexibility of the PD zone ,to provide a superior
. . ,livzn g environment b y concentrati ng n g develo p ment on .'.
the most gentle terrain of the site. I;L .
o Allowable density is proposed through utilization of o
the P.D. concept which provides for the most efficient 1,',
1 ..
use of land.
o The efficiency gained through achieving allowable ,
density promotes an economic arrangement of land
uses, buildings, circulation system, open space and
utilities.
I; o The design for the proposed development preserves
the significarnt features of the site a.nd arranges
Uses for appropriate utilization. The single-family
units are planned for the more flat areas fit the site
while the Multifamily units are planned tb be Iodated
N
near the creek and proposed space.
« ca p. p ,�
o T e design als rovides for edestr� an laccess
throughout the development including 'thy► open spade
acres. This helps provide visual and physical, access
to a complimentary mi)tture of development and open
spade
q
.'....a
• r rvi- r.•..4• i rti. v...,{�, `
I '...; . .. ry r 6 .,FII n"I..i...."t•I[S' ) 1
£..
M PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL, cont
\ HARMONY WITH SURROUNDING AREA The proposal is in har-
mony with the surrounding area and the area' s potential use.
The area is designated for medium, density residential use. The
. adjacent developments of Colony Creek Estates I and Waverly
Meadows have developed with some single-family, attached
>ti .
multifamily units.
•
As identified in the NPOO5 Plan Text, the area is buffered
from nearby R-4. 5 residential areas by Hall Boulevard, Bonita
Road and Fanno Creek, Fanno Creek buffers the area from the
light industrial land east of the creek.
a
The proposed development is designed to provide density
transition and natural buffering by locating single-family
ti
units on the western portion of the site and multifamily units
near the creek and proposed open space.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BENEFICIAL EFFECT - The planned devel-
opment concept will allow the project to achieve maximum allowable
density, which will accomplish Comprehensive Plan and NPO05 ob-
t`' j ectives of land use efficiency in the area between Hall Boule-
vard, Bonita Road and Fanno Creek. This will help sustain City
and State housin g goals and allow other areas of the City to be
developed at different densities
.
COMPLIANCE WITH STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS
GOAL lz CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT To develop a citizen tinvolvetment
Program that ensures the opportunity for ditizenws to be involved
in all phases of the planning process.
The governing body charged with preparing and adopting a
comprehensive plan shall adopt and publici e a progran for citi-
m 1� ,
x .
. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL, cont.
•
COMPLIANCE; WITH STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS, cont
zen involvement tha
t clearly defines the procedures e by which y r
the general public will be involved in the ongoing land use .
, , planning process.
The citizen involvement shall be appropriate to 5
program pproprzate to
a
the scale of the planning effort. The program shall provide
for continuity of citizen. participation and of information that r
enables citizens to identify and comprehend the issues.
t
• '
Federal, state and regional agencies, and special purpose
districts Shall coordinate their planning efforts with the, of
fected governing bodies and make use of existing local citizen
. involvement programs established by counties and cities.
* * * * *
•
The application will be heard in a regularly scheduled
. 1public hearin g before the Tigard Plannin g Commission. An y p er-
!,,:. son or group wishing to do so will be provided the opportunity
to speak and be heard.
GOAL 2: LAND USE PLANNING
PAS I PLANNING To establish a land use planning process ,.
and policy framework as a basis for all decisions and actions
related to use of
land and to assure an adequate factual base
for such decisions and actiois.
'I
.
Cit
le
..
. � City, county, state and federal agencies and special
..., '';i district plans and actions related to land use shall be con:"
sistent with the comprehensive plans of cities and counties ,.(
r. ,,, and regional plans adopted under ORS 191,705 through l 1.795.
All land use plans Shall include identification of issues
and problems, inventories and the factual information for
.. each applicable statewide planning gcoal i evaluation of abater-
r
• , - amiummilim,- - - --Nsiiiiimimilitimimaiii, . [.7�••.. a"i nsaY.'/,511 M•.dv?M Ir •, ....
e
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL, cont.
COMPLIANCE WITH STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL , cont. .-.
native courses of action and Ultimate policy choices, taking
into consideration social, economic, energY "and environmental
needs. The required information shall be contained in the
Plan document or in supporting documents. The plans, stipport
ing documents and implementation ordinances shall be filed in
a public office or other place easily accessible to the public.
• The plans shall be the basis for specific implementation measures.
These measures shall be consistent with and adequate to Carry
out the plans. Each plan and related implementation measure '
shall be coordinated with the plans of affected governmental
units.
All land use plans and implementation ordinances shall be
adopted by the governing body after public hearing and shall he -!
reviewed and, as needed, revised on a periodic cycle to take
• into account changing publid policieS and circumstances, in ac-
cord with a Schedule set forth in the plan. Opportunities Shall
be provided for review and comment by citizens and affected gov-
ernmental unit during preparationi .reView-and revisions 'of plans -
. .
and implementation ordinances. Affected persons shall receive
understandable notice by mail of proposed changes in plans or
zoning ordinances sufficiently in advance of any hearing to al-
low the affected person reasonable tithe to review the proposal.
PART II - EXCEPTIONSt When; during the application oe the State-,
Wide goals to plans , it appears that it is not possible to apply
the appropriate goal to speciic properties or sittationsi then
each proposed ekception to a goal shall be set forth during the L.
plan preparation phases and also specifically noted in the notices
of Publid hearing. The notices of heating shall swat atie the
, issues in an understandable and Meaningful tahher:
„
If the OkdeptiOn to the goal 18 adopted1 then the compelling
reasons and facts that dOhdltSiOn shall be completely set
■
,.1
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL, cont.
COMPLIANCE WITH STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS, cont ,
. forth in the plan and shall include:
(a) Why these other uses should be provided for;
(b) alternative
( What What locations ons within the area could be used
for the proposed uses;
(c) What are the long term environmental, economic, social and
energy consequences to the locality, the recion or the state
from not applying the goal or permitting the alternative use;
•
(d) A finding that the proposed uses will be compatible 'with
other adjacent uses.
PART III - USE OF GUIDELINES: Governmental units shall review
the guidelines set forth for the goals and either utilize the
guidelines or develop alternative means that will achieve the
goals. All land use plans shall state how the guidelines or
alternative means utilized achieve the goals.
* * * * *
The application and process for development approval,
plus compliance with the City' s comprehensive plan and appro-
priate development standards and coordination with the proper
governmental and non-governmental agencies and organizations,
provides a basis for local decision making on this land Use
- matter. No Part II exceptions are required as a part of the
development review approval.
p
COAL 3: AGRICULTURAL LANDS To preServe and maintain agricul-
tural lands;
Agriculture lands shall be preserved and maintained for
farm use, Consistent with existing and future needs for a.gri-
• i
cultural products, forest and open space. These lands shall be f .
inventoried and preserved by adopting earl t siV farm Use zones
pursuant to O RS Chapter 215. Suc h iin•,..
imum lot sizes as are:
utilized for any farm use zones shall be appropriate for the
J1.-.nrati •u..n....' ....._.r...,.-:..,... ...w.'..:......::::..Ni..Y. ., _.. , n.a . ...a.n .. w ♦ ...f.n n
F PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL, cont.
COMPLIANCE WITH STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS, cont.
continuation of the existing comme,`cial agricultural enter-
prise within the area.
Conversion of rural agricultural land to urbanizable land
shall be based upon consideration of the following factors: (1)
•
environmental; energy, social and economic consequences; (2)
demonstrated need consistent with LCDC goals; (3) unavailability
of an alternative suitable location for the requested use; (4)
compatibility of the proposed use with related agricultural land; '.
and (5) the retention of Class I, II, III and IV ,soils in farm
use. A governing body proposing to convert rural agricultural
land to u:i. banizable land shall follow the procedures and re
quirements set forth in the Land Use Planning goal (Goal 2) for ,
goal exceptions.
*
The goal does not apply because the site is within the
Tigard Urban Growth Boundary and the incorporated city limits
of Tigard.
GOAL 4: FOREST LANDS - To conser'v'e forest lands for forest uses.
Forest land shall be retained for the production of wood
fiber and other forest uses. Lands Suitable for forest uses
shall be inventoried and designated as forest lands. Existing
forest land uses shall be protected unless proposed changes are
in conformance with the comprehensive plan:
In the process of designating forest lands, comprehensive
plans shall inclUC e the determination and mapping of forest site
c ,
• .classes accoa�ding to the United States Forest Service manual d�
°Field Instructions for Integrated Forest Survey and Timber
Management Inventories Oregon, Washington and California,
1974. °1
* * *. * ,
1
•
rl i •
d
r .
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL, cont.
COMPLIANCE WITH STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS, cont.
The goal does not apply because the site is within the
.Tigard Urban Growth Boundary and the incorporated city limits
of Tigard.
$ W
•
GOAL 5: OPEN SPACES, SCENIC AND HISTORICAL AREAS AND NATURAL
RESOURCES To conserve open space and protect natural and
scenic resources. '
Programs shall be provided that will: (1) ensure open
space, (2) protect scenic and historic areas and natural re-
sources for future generations, and (3) promote healthy and
visually attractive environments in harmony with the natural
landscape character. The location, quality and quantity of
the following resources shall be inventoried:
, 4
1
a. Land needed or desirable for open space;
b. Mineral and aggregate resources;
c. Energy sources;
d. Fish and wildlife areas and habitats
• Ecologically e. Ecolog and scientificall significant natural areas,'
9 Y Y g
including desert areas;
f. Outstanding scenic views
and sites;
g. Water areas, Wetlands, watersheds and groundwater resources;
h. Wilderness areas;
i. Historic areas, sites, structures and objects;
r ,
D . Cultural areas;
k. Potential and approved Oregon recreation trails;
• 1. Potential and approved federal wild and scenic waterways
,. an
d state scenic waterway .
Where no conflidting uses for such re5ourde8 have been
identsfaed, such resources shall be managed so as to preserve .
their original character. Where Conflicting uses have been
. 4
r r,
`• ,,r
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL, cant.
COMPLIANCE WITH STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS, con {I
't�o '
identified the economic, social, environmental and energy con-
sequences of the conflicting uses shall be determined and pro"'
grams developed to achieve the goal. r
* *
The City of Tigard has not identified the site as signifi-
cant in most of the twelve categories contained in this goal.
g
The' floodplain and open space area on the site is identified ,
and is reserved as unbuildable open space in the proposal. ::
''. The site and the proposed development represent no unresolvable
conflicts with established inventories or Plan Policies.
GOAL 6: AIR, WATER AND LAND RESOURCES QUALITY To maintain
and improve the quality of the air, water and land resources of
the state.
All waste and process discharges from future development,
when combined with such discharges from existing developments
shall not threaten to violater or violate applicable state or
federal environmental quality statutes , rules and Standards.
With respect to the air, water and land resources of the appli-
cable air sheds and river basins described or included, in state
environmental quality statutes, rules, standards and implementa-
• tion plan, such discharges shall not (1) exceed the carrying
capacity of such resources, considering long range needs; (2)
degrade such resources; or (3) threaten the availability of
such resources.
* *
The proposed planned development on the site will generally
maintain local air and water ual'ity standard .
Y' quality s� All waste disc " "
charges generated on the site will be directed to appropriate
facilities to collection and processing. Existing f acilitieS;
and services are capable of accepting the additional waste pro- :.
ducts. The darryirig capacity of the land is not impacted by
the proposed development because the site is within an urban
1 '
.
•
�r,A.. (
�.
r PLANNED DEVELOP : NT PROPOSAL, cont. r '
COMPLIANCE WITH STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS, cont. '
area. Likewise, the development will not degrade the state' s
resources or threaten the availability of such resources.
•
GOAL 7 :, AREAS SUBJECT TO NATURAL DISASTERS AND HAZARDS - To
protect life and property from natural disasters and hazards.
Developments subject to damage or that could result in
loss of life shall not be p lanned nor located in known areas
of natural disasters and hazards without appropriate safeguards.
Plans shall be based on an inventory of known areas of natural
disaster and hazard.
* * * *
No dwelling units proposed for the site will be located in
a floodplain. No other identified disaster or hazard exists
within the site.
GOAL 8: RECREATIONAL NEEDS To satisfy the recreational needs
of the citizens of the state and visitors,
The requirements for meeting such needs, now and in the
future, shall be planned for by governmental agencies having
responsibility for recreation areas , facilities and oppo.rtuni--
ties; (1) in coordination with private enterprise, (2) in ap-
propriate
proportions and (3) in such quantity, quality and
location as is consistent` nsistent with the availability of the rem
sou `ces to meet such requirements. State and federal agency
recreation plans shall be coordinated with local and regional
recreational needs and plans.
*r * * *
Open Space area will be provided in the proposed develop-
ment The Open spade the area is pro Posed to be dedicated to the
City and Will be available for recreation use
GOAL 5: ECONOMY OP' THE STATE To diversify and improve the `
eConoily of the state.
•
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL, cont.
COMPLIANCE WITH STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS, cont. -"
Both state and federal economic plans and policies shall.
be coordinated by the state with local and regional needs.
Plans and policies shall contribute to a stable and healthy
economy in all regions of the state. Plans shall be based on
inventories of areas suitable for increased economic growth
and activity after taking into consideration the health of the
current economic base; materials and energy availability;
labor market factors; transportation; current market forces;
availability of land; and pollution control c requirements.
ua.rements. .,.
Economic growth and activity in accordance with such plans .
shall be encouraged in areas that have underutilized human and
natural resource capabilities and want increased growth and acti-
vity. Alternative site suitable for economic
y growth and expan-
sion shall be designated in such plans.
* * * *
The proposed planned development will provide both short
term and long term economic benefits to the city, region and
state. Construction on-site will provide short term
..: .. p employment
in several types of businesses and contribute to the local econ
omy through the purchase of goods and services. Ultimate de-
1 velopment of the site will contribute additional tax revenue and
will provide a flow of dollars which Will remain in Tigard and
re
the metropolitan region through mortgage.. eats and maintenance
p '� g pa er.
expenditures.
GOAL l0 HOUSING To provide for the housin needs of citizens
of the state.
Buildable lands for residential use shall be inventoried .
and plans shall encourage the availability of adequate numbers
of housing units at price ranges and rent levels which are cot-
,
,
i1
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL, cont.
' ` COMPLIANCE WITH STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS, cont
mensur'ate with the financial capabilities of Oregon households r•
and allow for flexibility of housing location, type and density,
* * * *
The planned development helps fulfill the Housing Goal by
offering city residents alternative-type housing units not suf-
ficiently available to them.
The concept for the proposed development is that of a high
quality living environment. The project will be designed with
high quality units on efficient lots.
,.' GOAL 11: PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES To plan and develop
r ..
a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities
and services to serve a5 a framework for urban and rural devel-
opment
Urban and rural development shall be guided and supported by
types and levels of urban and rural public facilities and services
appropriate for, but limited to, the needs and requirements of the
urban urbanizable and rural areas to be served. A provision for
p Oz
key facilities shall be included in each plan. To meet current
an d long ran g e needs a p rovi sion for solid waste di s p•
osaZ sites,
{, including sites for inert waste, shall be included in each plan.
* * * * :
The full range of urban facilities and services are avail-
. able to the site through the City of Tigard. There is no need
for enlarged or improved services due to development on this
Site.
12: TRANSPORTATION 12
ORTATzoN - To provide and encourage a safe,
convenient and economic transportation system
A tran5portat:LOn plan shall (1) consider all modes of trans-`
I ,
r tr.q..4+.,« ..,r.r. ..........„ �,...ww....•,...w.��... ,h. . , .,.. ., ,w.. rc:; t i•; i ihe;, .
•r qse a� 1.
r
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL, cont.
COMPLIANCE WITH STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS, Cont
portation including mass transit, air, water, pipeline, rail, •
highway, bicycle and pedestrian; (2) be based upon an inventory ;' •
of local, regional and state transportation needs; (3) consider
• the differences in social consequences that would result from . ,
utilizing differing combinations of transportation modes; (4)
s' avoid principal reliance upon any one mode of transportation;
. . (5) minimize adverse social, economic and environmental impacts !
and costs; (6) conserve energy; (7) meet the needs of the trans-
portation disadvantaged by improving transportation services;
(8) facilitate the flow of goods and services so as to strengthen
the local and regional economy; and (9) conform with local and
regional comprehensive .1:and use plans. Each plan shall include
a provision for transportation as a key facility.
• * * * * *
Circulation planned for the proposed development corresponds
to prior plan approvals in the development area. These plans
conform to the city' s comprehensive plan and help to provide a
safe, convenient and economic transportation system.
GOAL 13: ENERGY CONSERVATION To conserve energy . ° ' " ""
Land and uses developed on the land shall be managed and
controlled so as to maximize the conservation of all forms of
energy, based upon sound economic principles
The planned development will provide a density of housing
which will be an efficient use of land and structures. Utility
layout will be efficiently designed. Building siting and design
will take maximum advantage of south fading slopes to the great--
est extent practidablee
GOAL 14: UABANIZATJON To provide for an orderly and efficient
transition from rural to Urban land use.
•
•
,^W.++++.++H«.w•..a w e. ♦+.•. ..r uyY.w... r • r.. • 1 [ :14...
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL, cont.
COMPLIANCE WITH STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS, cont.
Urban growth boundaries shall be es,tabxished to identify
and separate urbanizable land from rural land.
. Establishment and change of the boundaries shall be based
upon consideration of the following factors: •`
(1) Demonstrated need to accommodate long range urban popula-
tion growth requirements consistent with LCDC goals;
"^- (2) Need for housing, employment opportunities, and livability;
(3) Orderly and economic provision for public facilities and
services; °r
(4) Maximum efficiency of land uses within and on the fringe
of the existing urban area;
(5) Environmental, energy, economic and social consequences;
(6) Retention of agricultural land as defined, with Class T
being the highest priority for retention and Class VI the ,
lowest priority; and,
(7) Compatibility for the proposed urban uSeS with nearby
agricultural activities
The results of the above considerations shall be included
in the comprehensive plan. In the case of a change of a boundary,
a governing body proposing such change in the boundary separating
urbanizable land from rural land, shall follow the procedures and
requirements aS set forth in the Land USe Planning goal (coal 2)
for goal exceptions.
An Y Urban growth boundary established P..,tior to 7anuar y
,
1976 which includes rtJal lands that have not been built upon
shall be revieWed by the governing boe'tY i utilizing the Same
factors appl Cable to the establ Shme; t or change of urban growth
k
p
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL, cont.
COMPLIANCE WITH STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS, cont.
Establishment and change. ..' of the boundaries shall be a
cooperative process between a city and the county or counties
•
that surround it.
Land within the boundaries separating urbanizable land from
rural land shall be considered available over time for urban
uses. Conversion of urbanizable land to urban uses shall be
based on consideration of:
(1) Orderly, economic provision for public facilities and.
services;
(2) Availability of sufficient land for the various uses to
ensure choices in the market place;
(3) LCDC goals; ands
(4) Encouragement of development within urban areas before t'
conversion of urbanizable areas.
* * * *
•
The site is within both the Tigard Urban Growth toundat `
and the incorporated city limits of Tigard. The property is
designated for urban use due to Its location within the city
and the current availability of urban services. Thus , this
'
goal is not at issue because there is no conversion of rural
land or any change of local boundaries contemplated.
o
• Y� ,\
r
•
,
{'
•) ,
F'ROPEFITIES CORPORATION
•
,
-, December 16, 1983 .
. City of Tigard .,
Planning Department
P a Box 23397
'H',... Tigard, Oregon 97223
•
Gent 1 emen
p Corporation p - a
•
In 1981 `Titan Properties Gor oration. urclased the property
identified as tax lots 3400, 3601, 4300,,, 101 and 100. The
purchase was made via a land sales contract. ;
0
In 1983 Titan obtained an option to purchase tax lot 3700.
The pro ert Yy , either purchased or under option to
purchase
constitutes the subject property to be platted.
,
Very truly yours, ,
t
TITAN PROPERTIES CORPORATION
,/
i/fir,//,',. 4 A 4,„ / ' . , ,
i S r'ephen A. Bleak
President •
SAB/p 1
r,.
. 1
;
N
1
i ( .
•
g2t l NOP tHEA 'T t C11N.LL CiAti/HILL I bilti',rii=it.GON.s i l /ELE Hti JE t O; i 04O bE5 i ,
'1.
, , + .tea, • ,,.,,
4ri1;
•��a. id
•
'.
•
'- ' q7 (
. .
.,-,. ...... ,,.. *OR C.'as I
.. `y P,O, &SOX $27 7UALAt1N OREGON'97062 PHONE 682-2601
COLONY Crq-=EK E5 1 ATE:.Ha r'1ec ei b er 16,
=, 16, 19s �
'
r slw `AN'..i\lc.2 r R E•E I,1 �'`
T I GAR G ,, 7279— 1
6 t TE--06 7- 00 y;
Gear City of Tigard,
u
", This letter is to notify you that, a Site Plan Rev ie�i has
been conducted for Colony Creek Estates -
' in accordance with Uniform Fire Code Article 10, to establish
required fire flew, hydrant location and street access f60
fire app (tra. 1]s
,i ' Provide a i ire hydrant located within 50 ti pat from all
portions of building, Hydrant shall be connected to an
approved water ':uppiy and shall, meet the minimum m fire flow
requirements, (.IJEC 10, 801
If you" have an'J r{Uest sns regarding th letter,
or if we may be dt any assistance in this ' 'tatterr
please eel free to tali me at 68 —'j.!601,
1 sC t the 44.,d‘. .i.
a it
'�.,', (_y f e 'F X14 er `.`e 1{t.i o 1 n' V y tv e.•a t .-, i+.M f -,,q ••-f i;, ,f. y '
--ti p r
.,.. `"'�
Y.
. L.
r'
r,
$,
■
r •
•
,
1
,. - ,..
,: ... N T W6."!FQ,'wlha,.,wtir
-:.;._;.,.._.,_.u,,-.',.,..,,...'.,....»..,.,,,.,,-..:,....,x,.,..,..-.:...-,...»....:...'..,:,-: ..:.,....:_ .,_gym..:::..,•,_r.w.::,...a ;,.;,_,. .._.._:._-.-. .....,;.., __.. .,..y.a.....,.,r... ,...,.,_�.._...-,..i... _...., ,._, _.,.. .,,..r..,.u. ........,.,..e,.» ..aM....»._... ..,....u.,..:,; .
1.•
•
+,. Washington County Planning Department '.
FF
t. v December 1977
X
' STATEMENT, SCHOOL MPACT
FOR RESIDENTIAL. DEVELOPMENTS' OF 4 UNITS OR MORE. ' ''
• �` . it i � �.
Since one aspect of development impact act relates to schools, the following. ..
.d
information must be completed, and this sheet submitted to the Planning Depart - j
: : ment with the effected app ication.. P1 ease cal1 648-8761 if there are any
questions.
' t . THE FOLLOWING. I S TO BE COMPLETED BY THE DEVELOPER
- 1�-- dame of p erson or f irm developing the property
6 i
-
'.•�, ,
Person to contact "� 1�� �1��...� � �C. .�`
41
;, Phone number vG.•-. -C;(1C�i«
//, ` mac.. �,.. � �.l l _ ,.�� �,,�t. , ° .- • ;� ,; '
Mailing address 1 ` '
rl Legal description of property being proposed ror devie opmerit (map ;
•
number and tart lot(s) number ( )14'7 .' 210 L' r's+' �i ICJ.-% 16 t IO' 5'700
0
� . — �rr toexpedite responses: from � school district in v olved please
indicate a gene al vicinity description of the property being proposed
::
for development
— Does the proposed development require a (please check appropriate box)
Plan Amendme-Ant [7]
'` Zone Change 4)
subdivision ( O
1
Variance
Conditional Use Permit
r •
Tote i number of dwe l l i rig wit is being proposed "�,.. .
•
, `- � •^.rgnw�y"�'1' !411}'.hYOrr�.rrrtY i _,.,. i ', ...L. '.L'_... dl,dG nr.i.r.t is- fY•d,It.fSl'... u�,
{
Type of units I?-i ng Proposed:
Single Family Number of Units ID
Duplex o
Number of Units • '
r '
Multiplex Number of Units
CCU -
Multifamily, — —�
Number of Units '.� I �
— How many bedrooms in each unit:
,
Single Family ,� - j
Duplex # . ..
, Multiplex �
11 a
Multiple Family Z-/ '
-- How ,many acres are involved in this proposal
When is construction likely to begin: year month r1
.:,..._, so, how
..' - I s the development to be completed in phases? �� l f
many and over what time period
unit scheduled to be completed: � '- .m odt'h '
•
When is the last un i a year� moat ,�..
�7
I I . SUBMIT THE COMPLETE ED FORM TO THE BUSINESS OFFICE OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT
IN WHICH THE SITE BEING PROPOSED FOR DEVELOPMENT I S LOCATED
III THE FOLLOWING IS TO BE COMPLETED. BY APPROPRIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL
wr+r.IF�w,. �,���. ... w.+lw.�,•,Iy.oM�.4..:iiY1p M I.
SCHOOL NAME. EXISTING EN R. EST, CAPAC I TY
•
Phil Lewis 446 441
Elemen ar,y _ .
Intermediate Twality Jx',, High 822 950
I i h Tigard Senior High 137 450
Additional Comments: Depending on how many children Will come from this develop- � •„
potential elemenw
rent, � ' /
t�.e for a crunck� e • •
xi®te a� Phil LeW`x.r� rind
• or Durham
r
�ary' schoo ls.o G�s� Th3a would mash l.,ik l y ts solved by ohang e
s in e erreh ar
y school
`Tnorma1l
attetida ice l�ouhdarie's or re=p y
lacat:�on Of 2a°.n�dergartsh ettldeiat+s Who WoUld/atten.d P.
i r formation provided by d ,k/, . �' .,•r ---- Telephone Igo, ]Lehr a
Da t e Deoember �'
IV. I78TURN TO DEVELOPER POR SUBMISSION WITH APPLICATION (Name & address on
page l) • s
0
• , ...«,r....w�.ay Y .�,.+..,.•.. n»w.,.+e..+--r.,ri«t! r" r...; uai i _ n, ar,u9i i,i i f s:r „i� .7.;."
.
. ..
,
CI1YOF T :.
1
WASHINGTON lP
N('TONl COUNTY,OREGON
w r,
CI NERAL A1)1'1. I.CA'I'I(ON FORM CASE No.
CITY OF TIGARD), 12755 SW Ash , PO Box 23397 RECEIPT No
Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)639-4 171
1. GENERAL INFORMATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY:
PROPERTY ADI)RESS S.W.HALL BIND, & .W. FANNO CREEK D.RLVE ". Associated Cases
LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2S1, Sec,_. „1 . TL 3400, 3601: 37081. 1.Q0 & 10
4. o-.. INTERNAL PROCESSING:
SITE SIZE 15. 27 acre_
Accepted for Pre-App.:
, .. PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* TTTA y ?352 TES By: '
ADDRESS PHONE ti •
?201 NEE. tr;OgN , RljD
Pre-App. :
CITY ZIP I�ILL�IlORQ,K ORF:rbN . _ _ 9/123_
APPLICANT'S TITAN PRO.PF�RTTR,S,,.. Datt Time
ADDRESS �;AM J PHONE ---
_ _ 'Accepted for Decision:
'.' CITY ZIP ,►.
app{ *Where the owner and the a, licant are different people , the y
applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in ------- �._ .`.
Hearing Dace
possession with written anthori.zatioL' from the owner or an
agent of the owner with written authorization The'written ° Hearing Re se t: T
authorization must be submitted with this application.
2. REQUIRED LETTER 0F AU'I'HQRIZATION IS ATZACH.ED YE��..El N0, Decision: filed
& max led � ,
Q .
3. THIS-APPLICA,CIQtJ INVOLVES-T HE FOLLOWING: APP.
Comprehensive Plan Amendment FEE FILED PAID Accepted for Appeal:
from to
By:
quasi--;judicial
legislative
' � .._ Date ear oI' CI in g:
Zone Change from to
• quasi-judicial k
legislati i DESCRIPTION:
x Planned Unit Development Plan
Designation:
{ concept plan X detailed plan X 450
Subdivision _ NPO No.11111111111 Major Partition
` ' Minor Partition Zoning District
Design Review
Conditional Use "� Zoning...�,�.. . .
. Map No. -
i
X Variance to Coning, Ordinance
'' : (Title 18) Quarter Section No
r'arose to Subdivision Ord, .
7. t T t lc, 1
Va ,
Reqtie5t hero lot l�:ri� ��� — ... .
./ S� hs i ir�� Land 1'e rm t dcv . STAFF NbT1 S
�''' V l is tad . lain:
' lira it age ways
Stoop Slope
$21055
L
.;: TTT : ,TTT 61... ....4 -,...... 6....r.{_4.. ...t '4 0 M r 1
GENERAL APPLICATION FORM ~. PAGE 2 CASE' No.
CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, �.. Box 23397
Tigard , Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171
PROVIDED BY APPLICANT) FOR STAFF USE ONLY
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMA�ZON (T0 BL PIZOVT Notice of Response
tit
4 ., DISTRICTS
A end ..�ejeived
Tigard- School Distriot 23J es
No Yes
SCHOOL DISTRICT
WATER DISTRICT Tigard Water District
FIRE DISTRICT
Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District. ,
City of Tigard
PARK DISTRICT Y �, �,,�,, _____r_-_. • .,
UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY -• Sewer Available: YES E::1 NO j
OTHER _. .
', 5. PUBLIC UTILITIES
ELECTRICITY PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO; ...
NATURAL GAS NORTHWEST NATURAL GAS CO
"TELEPHONE . GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.. �,
OTHER
, 6. PUBLIC TRANSIT (TRI MET)
NEAREST BUS ROUTE AND STOP Route 43, Hall Blvd. & Bonita,
Road
7. OTHER INTERESTED AGENCIES (SPECIFY)
• • See accort •an in• _.narrative
r ,
8. CHARACTER OF THE AREA
` ZONE VERIEIEb BY STAFF
EXIST PLAN bt8IGNAT/oN
EXISTING 'LAND USE p� ,.-.._..:.�.,
Residential
WORTH Colony Creek Estates 1 Medium R-7
SOUTH
Vacant Medium R-12
Medit R-7 & R� ,
EA8`t' vacant
WEST
Residential
Low R-4.5'
+, •J ,•., r• , .. ... .wwrw.w... .. ,•,r. •,.. 7,f9 , .,i. .. , ;,. •, y. q.1•JIt,)"•.r f r1:.. k s;',d' n'V..
YJ M ,.,t...,. ..,,.. ..u...M u,l+.r r.rJa.,.1,• 1 + 4
•
fir.•
3
.
N
i
C ENERAL_ APPLICATION I�OR ``:' �I'AGE 3 CASE No,
CITY OF TIGARD, 127S5 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 ,
Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503)639-4171
d
9. CHANGES IN THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA WHICH AFFECT THIS APPLICATION. Please: Discuss!
See accompanying narrative
, „
V •
10. DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE
L re (acres, square feet) 5. 7 Acres ,.
11. LXIS'TING STRUCTURES ON THE SITE square Distance Frou Pro pert Line
Use Feet Nor Ch South E6st West
i
�. Storage 'shed 1000. ,_ 50' _ 1►
Storage Shea. 200: I 430' .45' 850' 65' ,'
I
r..�r 'a.�rwriir.n . .�
NATURAL ONDITIONS •
I2. Percent Slope: Slope o bdld
;' � able site area x s eppr oktixnatoly two to five e¢.
Vege tat ,on Types Average Dame ter P
13 ercent Of Each
`des No Size Of Trees .
Tres:
X . ._.__ 18 in:;.. • 0% H
Brush: X, 5
�..: ..::..: ...��.....,.: ,.r..... n - L
1
Grass: X 851
.
. 14 : Floodpla i. How hueh of the site is Z,ti flood 3 l
p,�a�n. 1.4 Ad.
Water urses
15 , e" Co Wh a t t pe 7 h'aririo Cry,e
.
i.' 16, Rock Outdeoppi gs
17 : Other:
• -..rr.r'�^�.'�.r 41 . +�.�.w�rww•wrr.ii.•...r+...✓`.•.r.a� r
.
,: lg, prc�posed._.be e lo8mer:.,t: Please brie fly describe the proposed dove lophient _ propab
.........�� -..max..,
pr%se t development of 34 townho e i i 1.e-f ii% de ec1
rig arid' 57 s�n
. ., � tac
liva•nq tthi{:s
w...u:+Jy......+w.aLi r.1.s. wau.:.«...::F..1 -:y W+a w::..■rc.:.L r1F+y,.ar,:..:..:...+ :r.,. - -. ci. °,'{r+.1 ti:J.,.:,.. ,a ,
_.ainr.«rer+Y:r.M'riMiYML`a6�kubtr ,(C'II�YWYIdIMGw}Nlr!!ly�rI,y ..1. ,, m '
, GENERAL APPLICATION FOl(Ni- PAGE 4 t CASE No.
CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash , PO Box 23397 4
Tigard , Oregon 97223 - (503)639-4171
19. The following /still is not required.*
20. Overall Site Development •
Residential Commercial Industrial O,en S.ace Other Roads Total
No. of acres
or square 9.62 Ac. 2.87 Ac. 2.78 AC. 15.27 'c
feet per use
Percent of 63% 19% 18% 100%
site
21. Type of Residential Use and Characteristics
# of Bedrooms/Unit
11 of Units EMI 1. ililjggil Pr13.12.5.)2911
Single-Family detache..d 67 111111111111
Townhouse 34
111111111111
1111 111111
111111
22. Where applicable , please explain how the open space , common areas and recreational
facilities will be maintained.
See accompanying plans and narrative report.
23. If the project is to be completed in phases , please descri4be each phase of the Project.
See accompanying phasing plan.
Picitittti SUbillit the following with this application!
Xl. Written Oeherai Narrative number as required by Planning bepartment,
X2. Proof Of Ownership
X3. Letter of aUthorization if appiicaht is not owhet,
x4 , Tah map
St,tiil will yt)ut wht,ihor t h t i ot ig to bt,. t,0101)Iott.d .
, .
f Al)P1 ' _ ` CASE No.
GLNI;IZ�L X11 1 LLCf1'�'l Uh C;OEt�� - PAGE 5
, CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash , PO Bait 23397
Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503)639 -4171 ,..4.,
,� '.riig FOLLOWING PEOPL , AS REQUESTED 13? THE APPLICANT, SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF EACH HEARING.
• (e .g. Attorney, Surveyor , Engineer) 1.„
HN. AP
. Staff Notice
Notice Re ort Decision of Review '
, Name , _ c, _r --e e -- __."
2201 N.E. Cornell Road
• M �I
• street .
ems_ Hillsboro State OR Zip 97123
" Name n �Or i 1'P TnC
Street
2626 S.W. Corbett
Cit
Portlax
y State OR Zip 97201 X X X X j
Name
Street
, City State Zip
' N arum: .
Street.
tit} . State Zip
APPLICANT 1 ,1
Same as 4
Y
OWNER
Sarno a 41
3 . N
A
� 4 is
•
1
• . r.,.p.Y.w.. .,,.....F..e•,s......a_.....,.w..w....,..'.M,._.....,.. .. ! . „ + l.v:.. .. j,. ..1 T...J.:..:1 U.. .i.1!' ^di..,Y
4 .
. •
' SITE PLAN CHECK LIST ,
The Tigard Municipal Code, § 18.56.020(2) requires that the site'plsn include
• the following'information when applicable., The enumerated requirements are to
be located on a plan drawn to scaleb This ,listis provided to assist you.in►
• submitting a •complete application. . '
. applicat Staff
' Applicable Complete ,
'S NO S NO : COMMENT
'A
•
A. IMPROVEMENTS
•
••
34' paying on 50' R.O.W. Public
• 1. Streets . x ' P g l
• 26' paving on 40' R.Q.W. (mivate')
2. Sidewalks • x
3. Parking ,areas X
• .4. .Maneuvering.areas
, 5. Supply delivery .
,, ,, areas )c
6. Ingress/'egress' x
, points
7. Transit facilities•
•• 8 Landscaped areas ;
S. Recreation & open .
space areas x
• 10. Drainage areas x
11. Sensitive .land
areas & if a,ppli- ,
cable; a td-graphic
' map is required •
..' B. NON RESIDENTIAL BUILDIN k
1. Location of buildings
1 shown ;
2. Setback distances
shown
r
• 3. Typical elevation '
',( drawings included
• `� 4. Access points for
,.i. the handicapped
•
shown
C. RESIDENTIAL 11NITS
X 1. Number of square , ,
feet & lot dimensions
i shown for each lot
2v Location of unite '
:• :'• � X Yes-Townhouse units
shown No-8inc le-family unitt
b, OTHER
.
1. Peripheral yards are X •
as deep as required
by underlying zone
2. Lot coverage Same AS
o, 4 allowed, by underlyiti
tonei
+ 4 n
SITR DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS FORM i'
'°{ ` "o
,� a•.
,H v a.
'04 u 0) Cu
4-' > 0
v
P
0o + . a
0 to N � { • CO v EC:- 144 ' w w
n 3 T. e �
Total Sq. a - Landscapi O a� . o M . • N
a y,
O N o Cu b CU O '
Feet P P Sq. Feet z va Sq. Feet z cc Z a Z ca U' Z
' BUILDINGS
Single Family. Units max. 40
detached I 322,578 48 front yard- 67 129,031 2 2
attached
92 Multiple Famil� 99,682 15 en try are-. 34 33,000 � 1.5 2 - '
CONiERCIAL
List each structure
. ••0,7
•
{
INDUSTRIAL.
't List each structure _ u+..
1
t
I SENSITIVE LAND, AREAS `
Greenay �=
.
Flood lains 58,900 9 maintain -
0 000 ' 1 , natural
Steep Slopes 19,X00 3 areas - ,.
PUBLIC FACILT f
•
Streets r 096
18 street tt-
l2l'
Park or Recreation Area 12,000 2 12,000
Otility Easements _.
Common Areas 20,900 3 Street tre=
LANU..DEDICATED TO CITY
Lx s t i 255 '� �.
Ttact P►
h act 'di 150 1 ~
Tract 'Vi (31,700) r:
' Tract 1r (72;000)
over 20 1,;
Tf T S 665,161 100 b S .tc ` . x.(52 03
• kid.
r ,
M „..:,..... .. 7 .r..,
r
ti
.7r:
: . DENSITY CALCULATION FORMS
•
RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATIONS
556,696 sq.ft. , R-7 (84%)
1 Gross square foot area in applicable underlying zone 108,464 sq-ft. ,,R-12 (16%)
2. Number of square feet in sensitive land area designated as open space
(floodplains, drainageways greenways, or lands having o slope or
greater) 88,500
3. Number of square feet in public dedications . 405 (Tract 'A' and 'C')
q' in public facilities 121,096
4. Number of s uare feet r f
• (streets, sidewalks, utility easements, etc.) subtotal;, 210 001
... 5. Subtract the total number of square .feet from 2, 3, and 4 above from the
gross square Net Square Feet 455,160
foss s uare foot area.
6. Net square feet divided by the minimum lot size allowed in the underlying
zone equals the density allowed.,
units
Net. sq. feet 382,334 (R-7) + Min lot size allow 5,000 5
Net. sq. feet "77 (R-12) 1.67 Inc. x 12 units/acre 20
' 7. Proposed number of units 101
95 units
10
8. Density bonus allowed (max. bonus = 10%) 9.6
105 units a11owey
Note See narrative reference density calculations per 'Chapter ,18692 of the
Comprehensive
O
X
•
•
i ,
l•
- r p P s P . ' ,. , } ., {+ 7, LticYP..a n.:"T•,f,u.,1• .,I y;,