Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
ZCPD6-80
POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. • • • •T,»a.,,,.._x ;-.:� ......::..,is -a......".. ..,t' .:.::�.,.w_,7h"`u7 ..++,-.-�;�it�f,:;....�:Sc..sY a d:'4+:l+k'dr.:�'" U>n.s.�_..,:�:;�«,..-j..:t;.r-.;:x tom..-:ttur.s ..:urn:�:e'. .,:x:z•x;•.w„:-awt:ny�w '7.,-a.... ',�k.-S.-,... 1 rt., r Y t rls.�? r r f0 P .•�;: "FAQ C A. t ' 4 yc ..�: • • BUCHHOLZ BISHOP MAIN ST.DEV.LTD NPO#1 -'rmari ly 12660 SW Main St. ZCPD 6' 80-- •• 2S1 1600,1500,2200,140011300 1200 pt.200 ,... .. . ._ —,- r,,.hi:;,+,r,.+n....m,.....rits.,.,..,,.,;,x.:,_,",,,,;,».1.,,.e.-.,,...--n.....,,...,.+a..�.:........ ....•..,- ....w.n.-, o,. • r w t • • • r t 1 r, r w .I 1• ' • • • • • ar* . , ..,. . , , . . . Ws ; /4411t";'., . \ ,,,,v),---- .,i a 4raifrisi,A II\ U r . , CI 4 : OF TIF4 WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON December 8, 1980 . 'Mr. . B. B ,sh p `ci 5/0 .• ; 10505 SW Bar��r Blvd., Suite 303 ../,,,._ 1 Portland, Oregon 97219 Dear Mr. Bishop: During a recent review of our Comprehensive Plan in relation to Multifamily Zoning (A-12) , it was noted' that about one-half of your property,previously resented, to us for G. I. Joes,is in fact A-12. When you made your initial application for the C. I. Joes complex, you stated •.•'' that your p p ,ty a Zoned Commercial. n Ma p you are correctbut ontheCompreensive Plan Map you are incorrect. You have the right to request a Comprehensive Plan'Revision, but 'clue to -recent developments, Staff will not recommend'approval of any change which e1iminattis Multifamily zoned property. • • YoL11'`s tr11 y, llie tiowar Planning Director vmc •w, a • �4 •,. , �;_.._4 '0420 s.W, MAIN Poi. BOX 23397 TIGARD, a EGON 97223 PH 639-4171 • �„ ,. .. '...., .,.,.J-.+.,.,�.,,w»emMeMTr,^i'.nw.e .,..Ny:.«..,.....:r. w:., .+.,+-..■..,..a+.va..w., e,na,...• cvMe.A, s,,,Erre�tteYaL3:+nd2:SY,...0 - _ .Y`.• e • ��1 441 401// Q :ED Y ITY OF TIGARD; .OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 75 -- 004 k olSt mizod 1,1 AN ORDINANCE ANENDING ORDINANCENO. 0-32 NTITLED "CITY. OF TIGARD ZONING ORDINANCE OF 1970",AS AMENDED, AND AS CODIFIED IN TITLE 18 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE, BY ADDING A NEW CODIFIED CHAPTER DESIGNATED CHAPTER 18.30, ESTABLISHING A MAIN STREET COMMERCIAL ZONE, DESIGNATING THE BOUNDARIES THEREOF BY ATTACHED .ZONING MAP; PRESCRIBING AN EFFECTIVE DATE it-NP FIX AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ' THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 14: The City Council finds that pursuant to Chapter 227 ORS 4., and "City of Tigard Zoning Ordinance of 1970" No„ 70-32, the amendments to said zoning ordinance hereinafter appearing, after due and legal notice, were submitted to public hearing by the City Planning Commission on May 20, 1975, and to the Council there- ' , after recommended that said zoning ordinance be amended as herein-- after set forth. Section 2: The Council: further finds that after due and legal notice a public hearing was held by the City Council on June 9, 1975, whereat all interested persons were afforded an opportunity to be heard with respect thereto, and conditions pre- , cedent fulfilled with respect to the following amendments to the City's zoning ordinance. Section 3: The Council further finds that the purpose for these amendments is to protect the public health, safety and general welfare and furthermore, said amendments se ,e,,,,, g,,, ,„mpl,�, t the City's objectives and policies concerning commercial develop- ment as stated in Nei'hborhood_Plan Number One. The Main Street commercial district o Tigar i -ers sign5aantly in development pattern from commercial. properties abutting S. W. Pacific1 Highway a within the City and vehicular traffic problems and congestion are less severe on S W. Main Street in providing direct access therefrom to commercial properties. Section 4. The City of Tigard and g Ordinance in 1970°N No. 70-32, ' g e of 197Q No d Zon n Ordinanc as heretofore amended a as codified 18 of the Tigard Municipal Code, be and the same is hereby amended to add a new codified chapter numbered 18.30, reading as follows. Chapter 18430 MAIN STREET COMMERCIAL ZONE (C-3M) Sect�.olls: • yl • 18.30.010 Permitted uses. 18.30.020 Conditional uses. 18.30.030 Lot requirements. 1 18.30.040 Setback requirements. 18.30.050 building height. 18.30.060 Additional re uirentents. y ! ,) 18.30.010 Permitted uses. No building structures or land shall Sg-used and no building of structure shall here" after be erected, enlarged or altered in the C-3M zone eat-- cept for the following use8: ORDINANCE NO. 75 ,. ° " • . , Y (. 4 ° .iii �, •. it i Y .., " .. . ( 1) Any use permitteu. .... , - . ..,.... _., ,.... ry 4 . s ( 2) APiiiance store (incidental repairs only) ; , p , i 3) Ir,,,, loan company or other4rnancial institution; , . rr, ' • , ( 4) LUEPtiEting, photostatingc other reproduction I • ' process; ( 5) Business machines, retail sales and service; ( 6) Commercial schools such as business colleges, • music conservatories and trade• schools; ( 7) Department or furniture store; l'"• ( 8) Film exchange; . ( 9) Frozen food locker (family use only) ; (10) Hotels; . . (11) Instruments, scientific or professional (repair , shop) ; •' . , (12) Jewelry store; (13) Medical-dental clinic; . . • • (14) Motel; *.. (15) Newsstand; .. - (16) Professional or commercial office building;' . . (17) Real estate office; . * (18) Record shop; (19) ' Restaurant (except drive-in) ; (20) Sporting good store; . • • (21) Variety store. (Ord. 72-70 51, 1972; Ord. 70-32 . . 5140-1,, 1970) . . . . k , , • 18.30 .020 Conditional uses. In the C-304zone. the follow- ing uses and their accessory uses are permitted as conditional , . uses when in accordance with Chapters 18.72 and 18.84: ( 1) Any conditional use as permitted in a C-4 zone; (' 2) Amusement enterprise, including billiLrd or pool hall, bowling alley, boxing arena, dance hall, public swimming pools; . , ( 3) Auditorium, exhibition hall or other public assembly; ( 4) Automobile and trailer sales area; ( 5) Automobile parts, accessory sales; . . ' ( 6) Automobile repairs, painting and upholstery; , . ( 7) Catering establishment; ( 8)* Churches and accessory uses; • ( 9) Cleaning establishment; . . , (10) Colleges; (11) Community buildings (public) ; (12) , Drive-in business offering goods and seryices di- rectly to customers waiting in parked motor vehicles; (13) Indoor, outdoor and other theater ; (14) Feed store; * • . (15) Governmental structures or land uses not including I •, sChools; (16) Hospitals, convalescent, general, home for the aged; . t (17) Hotel (residential) ; , , ,.........................,.. • (18) Libraries: , , . (19) Lodges, fraternal organizations; . • (20) Lumber yard; (21) Museimis; . . . • (22) Parks and playgroUrids (pUhlic) ; (23) Pet shop; Shop; (24) PlImbinq, electrical or general 'contractor and (25) Printing Shop and newspaper publishing; • (26) Private club; (27)(27) Radio or T.V. serVide; . i . • (28) Secondhand store; , (29) Taverns, codktail lounges, bars, Clubs and any other activity whose pattonasie, meMbership or att dance' Is 1 restricted as to ace, age group or other -specificimitati;n; ORDINANCE No. ......3-...- . ' . - . , . . • . i . . • • . . . . ..14 7 4 . , 4 4 4 ' . 4 4 4* 4 • 4 r' ** 1 ' , ,. ,'r. , • 0 • # ------------,••t,,1----,..,,,,-,-...-I.,._•_.• , = ..,'1 4 * c* :,i. . .., . .Mai /41,4 , " • V 1 4 • a (30) Tire shop; , (31) 'Veterinarian's office or animal hospital; (32) Any business, service, processing, storage or display essential or incidental to any permitted use in the ",, C-3M zone and not conducted entirely within an enclosed building. (Ord. 74-49 §l, 1974; Ord. 72-70 S2, 1972; Ord. • 70-32 §140-2, 1970) . • 18.30.030 Lot requirements. In the C-3M zone the lot requirements shall be as follows: (1) The minimum lot area shall be six thousand square feet; " (2) The minimum lot width shall be sixty feet; (3) No maximum lot coverage shall be required. (Ord. 70-32 §140-3, 1970) . . 18.30.040 Setback requirements. Except as may other- wise be provided in Section 18.12.100, the setbacks for non- residential uses in the C-3M zone shall be as follows: (1) The minimum front yard shall be ten feet, land- scaped and maintained; y{ �(2) No side yard setback shall. be required, except when " abutting a residential zone, a side yard of five feet shall • „ be required; • (3) No rear yard setback shall be required, except when five abutting feetashalldbe required. a rear yard setback or twenty-• q uired. (Ord. 72-34 §4, 1972; Ord. 70- ,; 32 §140--4, 1970).. 18.30.050 Building height. . Except shall otherwise pro- vided in Section 1$.12.110, n' i ) building in the C 3M zone exceed a height of three stories or thirty-five feet which- ever is less. (Ord. 70-32 §140-5, 1970) . 18P30.060 Additional requirements. Additional require- ments"a i„a le to the C--3M zone include but are hot limited to the following: (1) Off-street parking and loading, see Chapter 18.60; and (3) Enclosure and r Chapter screening required, see Section 18.12.080; .♦' be sub4ectStontheaCOnd�.tions signs and sign structures shall 9 advertising ig j , limitations, prohibitions and • requirements of Title 16, to which particular reference as A, made; (5) Nuisances prohibited, see Section 18.121070. (Ord. 71-4 Si (part) , 1971; Ord. 70-32 §140-6 19/0) . • I Section 5: Each lot, tract, parcel of land, Or portion thereof, r.. Within the boundaries of the stain .StreeL commercial . zone, as designated, depicted and marked on the attached map, designated Exhibit "A", and by this reference, made a part hereof, t is hereby classified for use and limited to the uses hereinabove • ( set forth With respect to said zone, subject to the requirements of this ordinance and the applicable provisions and procedures of 0 the "City of Tigard Zoning Ordinance of 1970", as amended and as y , codified in Title 18 of the Tigard hereby further amendr�d as codifi„ iriented and said official map shall be and ren aind and le a e- p r Municipal fore or hereafter on file as a part of this ordinance at all times in the office of the Clay Recorder. ORO/NANCE NO 75 - ,, �`9... ..,.:. . .. • . --_- - __ 13yr t_0.14=riri_ieel:h,fr i 1„n 0 LIL.,_____. d .tha i tteeotietimo er no 1)711 cnumounb(4rti antse 4 1- ..v.t,:p.,,,.,,,,.,.,...,.,.. , . -,,. PASSED: • ";1::71-1:414:;;;.:::*i'l."■.•;" A . M ' / I ,A.4 +. ''''...r v .,..'1'� 17,. .ilii:tfJN J J�.y tnoi.CjA ...,Wd .. “" .. .. 'M... .,..,•"'-a w y,� I.'.'OA iC1IIDtYL-y. �. *' K,. .- a 1 41. 1.5�1 W. A , , , Is at , x ,,, 1 „,,,:„...; 0 a ,ims 4,04 , ...„,, 3.,,,r.; 4i..... -4,, ....:‘„..,• —.• _ „, A,...,,,. . ,„,v, „.„.. ,„: a imewielwr411111fleiliMik . ./,,,,,,-/ ,_,. 4,.... : . 4 ipppamm .4,..,,,,, rza- '.. : . ' . '41.-**47 V . ' :' ibAir. A � +• 1....''-'‹....... .,,r.17441100r.,,,,,,,'-' . •44 '''''.,...,„........,INT:..., ..:'''''. ,.4,q.4.1 41100, ''NV, di4.0..:,:''' lip 411e2. - litt.: :. Rep. S ;w /of . , .. , _... .., .4” ott ' 4 . ,,,,:. / 414). fii,,,....;,,,,• , (34,4._ ,..,. q 411, t .' ' 0 )10. 441,ei *,/ . ,.16.440\ . 4,. ,:,.-. ...: ./s,... ,• \.0" 40 ,.. , ii., 7. • //DI �U f k r .,,: 6 w. illSoo '. / 'ND ?■'' Agopp# ,, ,: 7,4 I C N1 , t.' # / • I 1 .. N/ t �•t ^„�� , . PP el*., .' ' . *44104 4 ,::T i *.\\\1:.:: ♦ ;•" Jw dw ". 400111111 its, 111* Aot> 4k. � � ,---..„ L .1.,.•.t.) 'NIII40p to Arii,„ #44:10,,,),,6-s, • a 1 tier . �. `�J ,w.,-,w•.ewwt\'..r.wr.«,r.r•..�,r................. .,.� .� *•..••mn w.e+wrrt+v+taxlqro'q�t:ryryw. .^',.° . ti■ ".1 .+*.N a reason* purchase area and thus meetslrle contract review board rules regaru.11ig the lack of bidding. Motion by Councilman Brian, seconded by Councilman Cook to approve purchase ,, of a floor model tire changer for an amount not to exceed $1,000 and declare'; an emergency to allow staff to not receive bids on said purhcase. 69 (f) Planning Director advised Council that Wednesday, h at 7:30 PM the Downtown committee will meet to discuss the I Joes complex ; d Thursday (42 August 25th at 7:30 P.M. the Park Board will meet wl - property owners abutting the Main/Hall Park area to go over the ORB plan for the area. Both meetings will be held at the Durham Treatment Plant. • (g) Councilman Scheckla asked the Chief of Police to report on his meeting with the owners of the Family Drive-'In regarding problems of traffic and parking in the area. Chief of Police outlined several areas of discussion at the meeting and stated the owners of the drive-in were very cooperative' and future meetings, will be scheduled to handle this situation. (h) Councilman Scheckla questioned the Chief of Police as to the reason for the Johnson/Main/99W signal light not functioning and requested City bill state Highway Department for time officers spend directing traffic in the area due to the light malfunction. 4 .. Chief of Police stated he woUld check into the problem further, however, the TSM project would be put on computer by September 8th. and would eliminate the problems with light sequence that the city is currently experiencing. (1) Councilman Cook questioned Legal Counsel as to the outcome of-the Killion/ Wheeler litigation. Legal Counsel reported the courts decision favored the City in the claim. Legal Counsel stated he would report further on the new Killion claim at the next meeting. 20. ADJOURNBENT: 9:18 P.M. Rf9 • 4,00.1 111••■■•••10 OP WIMP City Re or.er / ATTEST: -4) ••••■•••■•••■••■•M•.••••••••••••••••,....................••••••........0 0••••••••■••••••••• Mayor PAGE 6 - COUNCIL 14/NUTS AUGUST 25, 1580 • •■■■■■••■■■•■■•■■• 44.7„„ st, 4141.1i 9,1 r" ITV OF Titi7Igg- WASHINGTONcouNre,OREGON August 19, 1980 • Mr. J. B. Bishop MAINSTREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD. • 10505 SW Barbur Blvd. Portland, Oregon 97219 REFERENCE: ZCPD 6-80 (G.1. Joes/Mainstreet Development) Dear Mr. Bishop: On August 12, 1980 the Planning Commission held a Study Session concerning your proposal ZCPD 6-80. Out of this session came several issues which need to be addressed prior to your return before the Planning Commission for a General Plan Review, 1. Traffic circulation on Main Street and the Ash Avenue issue. 2. Density (building coverage) in relation to site size. • 3. Sensitive land• areas - floodplain. 4. Consideration of change of location of buildings to orient around the park. 5. Resolution of the ownership/lease with Western Oregon Marine. G. Resolution of the easement/duUcation of land on the north the Sorg property. (See attached letter) 7. Pedestrian traffic concerns. • 8. Parking configurations on the SoilLh portion entering/leaving the lot. 9. NPO 41 Policy for C-3M for "Smaller shops" heeds to be reSolVed. 10,, Attention to the Benson property to the east relative to street alignments and floodplain area . • Perhapsi the greatest concerns are traffic and the density on the Site. It )1' may be that we eliminate a Portion of proposed leade spade to lessen the traffic itpact to 99W än . Xain Street. 12420 SW, MAIN PAD, BOX 23397 TIOAkb, CAEGON 9722 H!639.4171 e '(1 4 , • w• ZCPD 6-80 Page 2 We have met with Williams and Gilham to discuss these i ssuea.,.. .Hope lil.rLv;, • • we will resolve same and move ahead for a General Plan Review. Yourc• .ru ,. r e -.ward Pl.-1 ing Director AHvmc encl. 7. cc: Williams and Gilham Architects & Planners • 4 • • ii 1 wse#r.ey.,4uA,r....Fe%-.w.4. r.royiw vu v.-a.�„wwGw{.er+�wryy��y.+.+Lw+3R2�b.r5M1•rzR1l F'.�rdAlxi#:1'a+�?C'.4'.�xib-.v"Y.�le..m4�.N�.4•�dHY4++pw Y,w,4�: � Itk . BAUER, MURPHY,. WINFREE & SCHAUB P.C. • ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1105 COMMONWEALTH BUILDING HENRY L.,BAUER 421 5,W.SixTH AVENUE TELEPHONE • EDWARD N.MURPHY PORTLAND,OREG0N 97204 (503)223-6H3 ANDREW H.WINFREE WILLIA,4 DCHAU p /:•• August 13, 1980 coUNsrr THArDoEUs w.VENEss .• t, • AUG 15 1980 City of Tigard CitY 12420 S.W. Main St. OF TIGARD • Tigard, OR 97223 Attn: Mr. Aldie Howard Planning Director Gentlemen: I I represent Mr. Otto Sorg, who is the owner of the property at 12566 S.W. Main St. , Tigard, Oregon. Apparently there is a development planned immediately west of my client's property, for which the City requires . • fifteen feet of my client's driveway area. Further, the City and/or developer, appears to be under the impression that Mr. Sorg has agreed to give fifteen feet of his pro- perty for this purpose. This letter is to, advise you that Mr. Sorg has not agreed to either give or sell fifteen feet o or any other part of his property, for the adjacent development. Yours Uery truly, • • Henry L. Bailer HLBdh cc: Mr. Otto Sorg 11) 4, • • • .__......-m.-.. _.,.......,.....,........... .•............... r,........,n,.»...,...M.._....,. .,-.�....M.,.,_...,...,tm»4-,.......,.-.-....,....+u.sA., a...._,...-...+.....««r e...,._.._.o-.•-.,,-,...,,...m......_„.-...-....,�......,.........,.....M.......,....,,,-...,_.,.,...,.,..«,...,..,......",..,.,.r.-;•.-o-.,.,«.........,.,. _.-,:t ....a.,-,-. (1:4 BAUER, MURPHY,WINFREE & SCHAUB , P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1105 COMMONWEALTH BUILDING HENRY L.BAUER 421 S.W.SIXTH AVENUE TELEPHONE EDWARD N.MURPHY PORTLAND,OREGON 97204 (503)223-6113 ANDREW H.WINFREE WILLIAM D.SCHAUB OF COUNSEL August 13, 1980 THADDEUS W.VENES REC81V AUG 15 1990 City of S.W.Tigard �l CITY OF TIGARD 12420 1'F Main 1.7�+t. Tigard, OR 97223 • Attn: Mr. Aldie Howard Planning Director Gentlemen: I represent Mr. Otto Sorg, who is the owner of the property at 12566 S.W. Main St. , Tigard, Oregon. Apparently there is a development planned immediately west of my client's property, for which the City requires fifteen feet of my client's driveway area. Further, the City and/or developer, appears to be under the impression that Mr. Sorg has agreed to give fifteen feet of his pro- . perty for this purpose. This letter is to advise you that Mr. Sorg c..a not agreed to either give or sell fifteen feet, or any other • part of his property, for the adjacent development. • Yours eery truly, w..t Henry L. Bauer HLB:dh cdt Vic. Otto Sorg • A MINUTES TIGA r PLANNING COMMISSION Augus 12, 1980 7:30 P. M. Tigard chool District Administration Board Room , 13137 Sid Pacific Highway, Tigard, Oregon 97223 • President Tepedino OPENED the meeting at 7:35. ROLL CA r Present: 4 onn, Funk, Helmer, Herron, Kollea , Moen, Smith edino Absent: Sp Aker Staff: . .Ho rd, Newton • The MINUTES of .the August 5, 1980 meeting were approved as Submitted upon motio made by Herron, seconded by Kolleas and unanimously carried. / ak There were no Pl ing Commission Commission COMMUNICATIONS. The President opened the PUBLIC HEARINGS portion of the meeting, reading the usual n tice o auy ,' rarEd procedure to be followed in the meeting. A equest w .4 made by the staff to hear Agenda item 5.2 first. Ther were objections by the Planning 5.2 SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT M5- O W/ (ODOT) .- NPO #2 : e ^ A request by the Oregon Department of Transportation for a Fanno Creek Bridge with > . 68' 26' x 34' Sensitive Lands Permit tof're ace the exists 26 Bridge o ry', Road. (�l s B �, e Located at Fazan Creek and Scholls Fer sh. Co, Tax Ma... 181 34AA Tax lots 200 and 500, and Tax Map 1S1 27D, Tax Lots 600 and 601 ) • • Howard read the STAFF REPORT and RECOMMENDATIONS. AAAPAYAAMAMMOAUMMVAANOWANAmm ti. There was no PRESE'NTATI'ON by the APIPI,ICANT. i There vas no PU)3T,IO' TESmTTION'Y. The President"/asked Staff if the Bridge ytwas in an area of high flood levels /and if the . a proposed Brid e w..o ul d affect the levels./ Howard that it� Was in 'an area of high h �) , floodin g but th ' the would not affect the flood. levels. r Helmer asked if the elevation would be raised`.slightly and the i span would b ' lengthened. Howard stated that Was the case Helmer asked why 0 OT didn't raise the Bridge to the 100 yro, flood level rather the a that difference in height"`ea s minimal. Howard stated the problem s with streetli er restated �ted that the height difference was just a couple of inches. " 3e felt dUe to/past flooding p area it would be beneficial loodin problems in the to raise the Bridge to the 100 yr» level, �#ow�ard stated that approval could be conditioned as such. rTeped3 no concurred. with; •. &'mod =r,r.w+w. �.:...�., y t ';. • • 4' 4441 MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION August 12, 1980 Page 2 Helmer that ODOT should rallse the Bridge height to the 100 yr. flood level and that should\be a conditidn of approval. Noen raised a question about provisions for pedestrians and the bike path that connects with Beayertonts. Howard answered that no considerations had been made\for,pedestriens in that particular location. After further discusion' between staff and the Planning Commission, it was decided to ask<the applicant to address the bike path in the final plans that wouY \come before staff. It was suggested that a culvert could pe provided for the Bike Path under the Bridge. COMMISSION ACTION AND DISCUSSION: \ Moen MOVED approval of M5-80-Egggii-Wris'EETY-TIndings and reco endatiTiiwith two additional conditions: 7 "Meet the 100 yr. flood plain." "Pay some specia attention to the bike Helmer second /the motion, which carried animously. 5. 1 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ZCPD 6-80 NPO#1 (j. B. Bishop 1G. I. Joes) A request by J. B. Bishop and H. J. Bucholz of Main Street Development, Ltd. for a General Plan Review and Zone Change from C-113M "Main Street Commercial" to C-3M PD "Main Street • Planned Development District" Zone for approximately 11 .51 acres located on the southern end of Main Street (Wash. Co Tax Map 2$1 2AC1 Tax Lots 16002 1500 2200, 1400, 1300, 1200, and a portion of 200 parcel #3). Howard pointed out that this was a Study Session and no _formal action would take place. There was no staff Report. Howard stated that there were a few items to be read into Public Record. This sess'Lon, ,said HoWard, was intended as a discussion of the issues with a presentation by the applicant and questions by the Planning Commission and other interested parties. The Commission will then .) decide what formal action to take. Howard also informed the Comm- ission that the Public Hearing calendar is open for the rest of August and September. Staff read letters regarding the project itio PUBIJIC RECORD froM: NPO#1 John Butler, Secretary . 0 4 e MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION August 12, 1980 Page 3 Ps, Joseph D. Jebbia, Main St. Businessman (Commissioner Smith arrived at this point. ) President Tepedino reiterated that this was a Study Session. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION: was made by Louis Gilham of Williams )to tend Grirair.Ii717tects and Mr. Wayne Kittleson of CH2M Hill. Mr. Gilham reviewed the concerns of the Planning Commission from the June meeting at which time preliminary approval was granted for the project. The traffic circulation problem was addressed. Three alternatives were presented. Two variations on one of the alter- natives sere further discussed as the most viable solutions to th traffic circulation problem. Advantages and disadvantages of the traffic alternatives were presented. Alterations to the site were discUssed including truck traffic through the site and building cofigurations. Special consideration was paid to the impact of the site on the greenway. The issues of non-ownership of the Marine and sensitive lands were discussed. '7 President Tepedino raised a question about the road running on the northern edge of the property asking if it would be built to City standards, The applicant replied that it would be. There was no PUBLIC. TESTIMONY. Commissioner Funk expressed some concerns about the traffic circulation proposal. These concerns were addressed by Wayne Kit- tleson of CH2M Hill. Comm/891011er Moen asked about sIgnalization coordination which was addressed by Mr. Kittleson. Commissioner Helmer asked about the Johnson Street alignment and expressed concerns with the proposed traffic pattern. Commissioner Bonn asked about filling the floodpiain. The Public Works Director stated that the effect on the floodplain would be miniscule. CommissJemer Snith asked pbout the possibility of shAfting the ) ;,f proposed road to the sollthern edge of the property. Commissioner Kolleas expressed concern over the fa,c't that the development only has one tenant at present. Commissioner Herron reiterated the concerns of Comtissioners Smith and Kolleas and Objected to the ) possibility of another traffic signal on 99W. Commissioner Moen asked staff how the project fit ih with the propOsed greenway and civic center mentioned in the NPO#1 plan. Staff related the proposed project to all of the future plans proposed for the down town area and the project's impact on those plans. There was further discs about the traffic circulation problem. Bill Benson, owner of he property to the east, spoke in favor of the proposal. 4 'T _ • „ '.; • k. MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION August 12, 1980 • Page 4 Commissioner Funk presented his traffic plan for the project. The parking plan and traffic signal were discussed. Commissioner Smith brought up the density question. He sug- gested that perhaps the applicant may be trying to overdevelop ' the property. Commissioner Moen reiterated Commissioner Smith's comments regarding the type of development. Commissioner Moen • • I added that he favored the proposed street along Fabric Creek and that • he saw no problem with an additional traffic signal on 99W. Pres- : - ident Tepedino agreed that perhaps the development was too intense for the property. PUBLIC COMMENTS: 611.0•••■•■••■•••■■•••• • Wayne Johnson, Main Street Businessman, commented that a traffic light at Johnsbn might help pedestrians crossing Pacific Highway, He also agreed with Planning Commissioners that perhaps a development of less density might be more appropriate for the site. • John Butler, NPO#1 Secretary, stated that the NPO#1 Plan supports the concept of an anchor at the West end of Maih Street similiar to the proposed development. , •. Staff reviewed the concerns of the Planning Commission, After lengthy discussion among the Planning Cotmission, Staff, • the Applicant and the PUblid, it was decided that the Applicant would work with Staff. The Applicant and staff will addtest the concerns of the Commission and then come before the Planning Commission for a General Plan. Review. Commissioner toUg Stith submitted his resignation. President tilepedino ADJOURNED the meeting at 10:00 P.M. •• " . , . , " • - - - e-• 4 . . • AGENDA TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING August 12, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OFFICES - BOARD ROOM 13137 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard 1. Open Meeting: 2. Roll Call: 3. Approval of Minutes from Previous Meeting: . . 4. Planning Commission Communications: 5. Public Hearing: A. Staff Report 8. Applicants Presentation • C. Public Testimony 1. PrOponent's 2. Opponent'S 3. CrosS-Examination 5.1 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 6-80 (J.B. Bishop/ G.I. Joes) NPO #1 5.2 SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT, M 5-80 (Oregon Department of Transportation) NPO, 42 6. Old Business': 7. New Business: • 8 other BUsinesS: 9. AdjoUrnMent: • • • • • c• , ' - ; , • . . • ''sk. PUBLIC NOTICE ' TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING August 12, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OFFICES - BOARD ROOM 13137 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard . . . . 5, Public Hearing • . ;75:3177.:.,4:50,7010d,i17 ttialgE.b. UEVtti57V:1;4•ET. Or'ij":4,St4 " ',• NPO #1 A request by J. B. Bishop and H. J. Buchholz. of Main StreetDevelopment, •,- . Ltd. for a General Plan Review and Zone Change frOM C-3M "Main Street Commercial" to C-3MPD "Main Street Commercial Planned Development District" 1 zone for approximately 11.51 AdreS, located On the. southern end of Main , Street (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2AC, Tax Lots 1600, 1500, 2200, 1400, 1300, 1200, and a portion of 200 parcel #3) . 5.2 SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT, M 5-80 (Oregon Department of Transportation) NPO #2 • ',,. A request by the Oregon Department of TranspOrtation for a Sensitive . . • Lands Permit to replace the existing 26'x34' Fanho Creek Bridge with a 68'X34' Bridge Iodated at Fanno Creek and SdhollS Ferry Road (Wash. Co, P Tax Map 153. 3411A; TaxLots 200 and 500, and Tax Map 1S1 27D, Tax Lots 600 and 601) f 1 • For Tigard Times to publish duly 300 1980 and AtguSt 6; L980 •4 •'1' • • • • .4% . , , • , • • •'ct, c 1 • I .l . AGENDA 5.1 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Atigus.t 12, 1980 7:30 p.m. SPECIAL MEETING • Tigard School District Administration Offices Board Room 13137 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 6-80 (J. B. Bishop/G. I. Joel. Main Street Development) NPO #1 Please review information previously submitted. Presentation will be made by applicant, This is a Study Session. • • • • • 1,• moan as..,.n�a..o-„,n.A r;-•ra-«w-nwlaax M4••gg,.-,'x""••a...,. .,...... -w.. .Nwa. ...v.v....n.-dares+w.w,rN+^fnMM:*hkNNx!IgIHt44+ty"�'�.:eA%'rY.,,:N"f,Y'W:"'?.5«y".'`N..Y.=EWISYlt�%L.tyv;�~' ' r . _.., .„ . . , \ ,.. , l'• , 6' : ! ''. , . . 4 ■,..., a.:4 , ■ , I 1...Amp's, AEBI & E3AILEY .,' . . LAWYERS , . • . • I56 GEORGIA-PACIFIC BUILDING .. . , . PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 . .., * TELEPHONE(5031 224-6532 DAVID C.LANDIS FT.ec M.AEBI JOE D.BAILEY JOHN D.MERCER August 12, 1980 , . . ; JAMES M.CALLAHAN ., * N'. ANNA M.MORAN ...„ ; H.ELI7ABETH GOEBEL z Li:3i ) ,. , . . .. .. , ! . I•■••••• ' r ,.. . r ■• I. • , • • ,. . . • , . .r . • . , Frank Tepedino, Esq. P. 0. Box 8623 ? Portland, OR 97207 '..-. , Dear Frank: , - I enclose a copy of the memorandum 1 sent out in May concerning preliminary plan approvals in planned • developments. , . - •,' . Very truly yours, • ' s . . i,,,,,, • , . • . . • i 1 . . . ' .• i , . . . . . , r — . . be D. Bailey . ' . ',- .. .•. •.. /ra,‘ (. ele,-) n / u . . .,. , , ....., _ • • ...., . .. .. - • . . r . . ., . , . . . . .., , ., .. . . . , , --,,,, ,..,„.-...„„,,,,,,,,-...,,,,..,....,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.......,.,,„„,...„,„,r.,,,:4,„,-;•,-,- ------,-,,;--,-,-----'7-4r.--L-,-------- ..------4,-'---rt,',,,t-;w,,,,,,-.44.x,'p'.4,--4-,,,,-4-----.- '.-.-,,t-t----,:-o,':"'.."'.' ' '' "T'" ... '"''''''''''''''''' ' . ' '' • • 1 : . . MEMORANDUM TO: Tigard Planning Commission FROM: RE: (:Z1CPD6-80 P , .ain St. D elopment, Ltd. (DishopiBuchholz) - . _ As a result of the Planning Cr.,mraission action of April 22 the applicant has filed a notice of appeal with thc City. You may reraeira5er that we have previously had some diffi- , euIty in dealing with attempts to appeal from denials of pre- , liminary approvals in planned development proceedings. For that reason 1 was asked to consider the notice of appeal, the pro- ceedings of April 22, and the relevant ordinances, and to advise the planning staff, the City Council and the Planning Connission with respect to the problems that have been presented. My conclusion is that the application should be remanded to the Planning ColainissiOn. Vero is my reasoning: 1. The basis for the dehial, as recited in the Planning Director's April 29 letter to the applicant, was that the Planning Commission felt the application contained "an inadequate design i .4.b of access to Highway 99 and the tie-in to Main Street, and an un- -. ; ) settled floodplain-greenbelt qUestion. ° 2. Section 18.56.020 describes the standards and proce- , • .) dures for the Planning Commission's re• iew of preliMinary _ deveiopMent plang. 1 have attached copies of this Section to . . this memo. For this discussion 1 am focusing on subsections (b) * ) and (c) . Subsection (b) describes the Planning Commission's tole at this stage as follows: ; , e b r fit. - . _... _ ............ ......_. ..__.... ...._-.... .. .,. - -.. ., ...,. --._. .. _.... • �? yvY.b • I, 4 ,., "The planning commission shall informally review the preliminary development plan and program and may act to grant preliminary approval, approval With recommended modifications or denial. • Such action shall be based upon the comprehensive Such plan, the standards of this title and other regu- lations and the suitability of the proposed development in relation to the character of the area. " I think some ambiguity is created by the phrases "the standards of this title and other regulations, " but I think the section is still relatively clear. It seems to me it is saying that at this stage the Planning Commission should consider (a) whether the pre- X, r litlinary plan is consistent with the comprehensive plan and (b) ,C ,,,� . proposed S , character .r whether the ra�o3�t� c�evelo�ment. is suitable, given the c , u of the area. jarring some significant anomaly in the comprehen- sive plan these two criteria ought to be redundant. That is, i the comprehensive plan makes good sense then if the proposal com- plies with the comprehensive plan it ought also to be suitable for the area. With regard to the language about 'the standards of this title aid other regulations" I see the Planning Commission's role as being limited to the lientification of inconsistencies between the proposal and specific standards or regulations. This reading of subsection (b) seems to me to give a Very limited role to the preliminary plan review. X see the question subsection (b) puts to the Planning Commission on to be, "1s the proposed land use generally suitable for the land under the comprehensive plan?" 3. The mechanisi made available by 18.56.020 for the Planning Coi;ission's convey ing to the applicant its reservations and concerns is its poWer to make reeoimendati ons for modifying the preliminary plan and to make stggestsons for the general plan. 2 . wNrwY+H'O.wWna,+x4 V'.MS+w+A.r..K++rvwngnYH,MI.Sn +M1 a4. ,,,, •,., ....,...: , ‘t, • :210 N, Subsection (c) carefully protects the Planning Commission fro . being regarded as having given specific approval to precise locations of uses an so forth in the Tmerai plan stage. That ir, subsections (b) and (c) make it clear that it is the general plar, • stage, and not the preliminary plan stag' , at which the commission and then the City Council must rule on the concrete details of thy plan. Section 1C.5C.030 provides enhaustive detail as to th,.. subjects to be considered in connection with the general plan an= the standards to be apnlie1. All of the concerns referred to in the Planning CoMmission'E.,. April 22 action ate specifically iacn • tified in 10.56.030 as subjects to be encountered at that stage, I am aware that there are good reasons for considering • every important element of the plan as early as possible. I • think of the connections between the proposed develoPment and external traffic patterns as being among the most important ele- ments of a plan. I know that delaying consieleration of such things as fl.,raffie patterns until the tim a general plan is pre- , seated can result in significant expense to the developer and . , substantial loss of time to both the developer and the city. It is always easier to change those things early in the game. ny reading Of our ordinance, hoWeVer, says that kind of decision Making Must be postponed until the general plan stage. These issUes can be considered only a5 they relate to the standards for preliminary plan review, Set f6rth below. he Planning ColaMission can, of coUrse, recomraend modification in it response to the pre- liminary plan presented to it, and in that way save at least some of the time that would otherwise be lost. • 3 k E To summarize, the only legally sufficient bases for the denial of a preliminary plan are (1) the incompatibility of the proposed use and the comprehensive plan; (2) unsuitability of proposed the ro use � n given the surrounding area, (3) conflict between thQ proposed use and a particular section of the zoning code or a particular relevant regulation. Since it was clear to tie that I would have to recommend to the City Council that this matter be remanded to the Planning l> Commission, and since no matter what the result in the City Council ?{ the issue would be returned to the Planning Commission in one way or another, I decided that the most efficient method of processing this application from this point Was to return it to the Planning z Commission age Ada for reconsideration in light of the provisions • Of Section 18.5G o 020. Because the code treats the Planning Coiaiz fission s review of a preliminary plan as an informal pro- , seeding I have anticipated that questions of the scope of the discussion when the matter is again on your agenda will not be troublesome. New testimony cannot be taken without reopening the hearing, but the commission may well feel that it, does not need further testimony. 1 / 4 ^ a,m,.i.n.h-...re.,M..,,rvMwub:d*r„:r«Mx•..n. w-,r.,.r ...,... ...�cM :. ., ..., , ..... , k'w.»+`aw;m�.�.3,.r!nAn tamaak a�rc,f.�:••as.w..w �....u......,,n.,K:t.+ (( 4 • recommended Council award the bid to Miller & Sons, Route 3, Box 62, Sherwood, Oregon 97140, in the amount of $].4,697.75 with the condition, that an addendum to the contract be signed stating that the bid will be ' considered null and void if the City does not give formal notice to ' proceed within 60 to 90 days after the acceptance of the contract This will give the staff time to get the easement needed. Motion by Councilwoman Stimler, seconded by Councilman Schecicla to • award the contract for Hillview LID to Miller and Sons in the amount, of $14,697.75 With the condition that an addendum, to the contract be signed requiring notice to proceed be given to the contractor 60 to : . 90 days after the contract is signed or the bid would become null and void and would not be bindi;ig: to the City or the contractor. Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council 'resent. (f) Planning Director advised Council the G.I. Joe's proposal, SW Main Street would be considered at the °y w»Ct' ' ..vmmrknrueUrimission study session. He stressed that no action would be taken, the meeting was for discussion. only. 8:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING 16. SW WALNUT STREET LID PROPOSAL - SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (a) Public Hearing Opened (b) Director of Public. Works gave brief synopsis of L s ry"noti;ng that LID's history the improvement is.for sanitary sewer and there would be some city participation in the cost. t w a``'A (c) Public Testimony No one appear -i. to anti::. (d) ,Director of Public Works recommended Council proceed with the process and approve the ordinem e (e) Public Hearing Closed rt (f) ORDINANCE No, 80-66 AN ORDINANCE CONFIRMING AND RATIFYING THE RESOLUTION OFyTHE CITY COUNCIL OP JULY,28, 1980, W RESPECT TO �f _ P'ROvIIIGU1tATI�'Yt`iVGSAND ADOPTING DISTRICT', r NG PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS Tl":C SEWER SYSTEM' D CLARxNGARE?YTLTS OPNHEARING HELD SANITARY . ; , "T THEfiT�O,, 'I DItECTING SOLICITATION ATION OF BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION; PROVIDING FOR THE MAKIN DECLARING AN rMERGENCYG OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS, AND PUBLIC NOTICE 1 SW EATRERINE STREET LID .:.. be final as e o ,>=n 301 should T s � � (a) Director of Pt�blx.c Works e...• l.aa.ned some changes to. X51 EB g o. 3 s 1 a: ... zo],1, noting that Tam Lot No. 100 had w`azved P '� r Tax Lot 100 and stated the owner ce " his right to 10 Jaya tot of the fearing, Also that lac. Lots 200 and 201 fiver'a assessed wrong and in ; spreading the assessment equally to all properties)erties the final a P g � y' I� P ssesstent a ;.,. - w,t ) 7 August 1980 From: Neighborhood Planning Organization #1 To: Tigard Planning Staff Tigard Planning Commission v Hall Tigarck. ,gon 97223 Concerning: .81sbop/Buchholz Main Street Development July 1980 New Site Design Report by Williams and Gilham . Dear Sirs; • • We have reviewed the WilliaaSand Gilham report of July 1980 on the . , revised site design of the Bishop/Buchholz Main Street Develop- . ment and to suppliment our document of Apri11190A on this subject(att4Phed). This new site plan appears to Us to be an improvement over the original site plan presented in April 1980. It appears to provide better "access and traffic circula- , tion within the development. Also this plan appears to provide better stacking of outgoing traffic within the development and not on Main Street: The placement' of the new proposed east side road in the develop- ment does present implications about the extension of this road to Ash Avenue as future development of this area occures. We must reemphasize' our concern about protecting the "residential character' of the Ash Avenue neighborhood if this connection should ever occure. • Sincerely, .-41111. #1 -Secretary • • • • 44. g•IR 0.4 TO: The City of Tigard FROM: Neighborhood Planning Organization #1 Over the past several months NPO #1 has reviewed and discussed a number of current issues relating to development and planning for the NPO #1 area. We feel that our discussions have lead us to consenses on several issues and as such we wish to provide our . throughts to the city planners and decision makers. We hope to provide assistance in the interpretation of the original NPO #1 plan as it relates to the various issues before the Tigard Planning Staff at the present time. We have addressed each issues both independently and as they relate to each other and would like to offer the following: I. South Main Silreet Develonmen_ I We have reviewed the recent development proposals fOr the South end of Tigard's Main Street(specifically the proposal of Mr. Bishop and Mr. Buchholz) as well as the Tigard Planning Staff • proposals for downtown traffic circulation and the realignment of • Main Street. We are supportive of the concept of a major shopping area develop- ment at the South end of Main Street. This development is consis- . tant with the current NPO plan for two primary reasons. 4 1. The proposed development, in fact, has greater frontage on Pacific Highway than it does on South Main Street and as such complies with policies #18 and #19, sUggesting the avoidance of Pacific Highway strip development. By the use of controlled ' access to Pacific Highway, this type development provides common parking facilities to clusters of busines8es. 2. The proposed development is further consistent With the original NPO plan that addresses the desirability of supporting downtown Tigard'S "small town perOonality" by providing the corns econOmio base to "anchor." the SoUth end of Main • • ■• • ( , Street. With the sufficient customer draw provided then on both end8of Main Street, the Tigard downtown development of small shops and a "unique commercial area" is more likely to occure. Consideration of these points favors the development that has been proposed for the South end of Main Street over the Tigard Planning Staff proposal for the realignment of Main Street, which would significantly reduce the development potential of Main Street's South end. The need has not been adequately identified for the : . realignment of Main Street and the Johnson Street extension to Ash Avenue through the development. While we are supportive of development at the end of Main Street, we strongly recommend careful consideration be given for the traf- io impact of such development. Traffic is our prominent concern. Justification and instillation of controlled accesses to Pacific Highway at two locations should be emphasized. vtg: In general, it is our opinion that a major development at the •SOUth end of Main Street is not only compatible With the original NPO #1 „ plan, but with due care in the design of traffic flow control it Will be an asset to the Tigard community. II. Hill Street Extension to °tiara Xn line With the original NPO plan, the extension of Hill Street to Omara appears a desirable priority objective. We wish . ' to identify our support for the desirability of the extension and suggest that should development odoUre it this area, the capability .)• to preserve right-of-Way for the connection of Hill Street to 0Mata • should be assured. This Specific 'concern should be considered during the review of the Senior Citizen Center currently proposed for this area. . if p IS JJt i a' n ',''.. III. A•$ Avenue _Extension We have reviewed the Ash Avenue Street extension ques- tion• since it was raised by the Tigard Planning Staff in its ` downtown Tigard circulation plans. We have considered the issues ` . raised by the Tigard Planning Staff, as well as, those raised by , ' the citizens of Ash Avenue and the immediate area. We do not, at this time, see a need to extend Ash Avenue; however, the Ash Avenue . ,, right-of-way across the greenway should be preserved. Protection , • of the "residential �hara.cter�� of the Ash area neighborhood should r be the, highest priority of this area. L N• • • 4 ri ,c p j , ■ I { d , , ii { i ` • li .1[( •, D y n 4' I'', A • r L__ • ....+y. %;,,....r...+,,.w..h.w...i•-nk+w,yp..n+1,.!'+ef*... IMC:M 1ft15.,1%.v.•A'i✓wr :r...,tl.'4 • ': ,y • r AFFIDA V OF PUBLICATION E�Ea,J C� ' 6Y ;,k , 4 . / +? `, s,• ..r ' ,w t`}�^'K LryY Y Y t r , y Y • .. j+i ^ `..n. '. .. • °'s STATE OF OREGON, AO t 4,, .Ay°,,$r i , , � ' {, ' •"„`s �+ ,. • ....., ss: 1a M +x.$'id'n '.;'_� • � r S , :"a1' 615 .,:a ,p'i�ti'4 t� ., , ', COUNT OF w.ASx1NGTON, AU k , C ' L{ ,r .- '-',A'"L11 '?. .I'S1R 14:' ,te#41,Xs. °S `;.4µ '. . t i ` - CITY ''(' p` h '•i,i, AW f L'll,t,°A`V V/.LMI `. '_"r, IGAR e +�'" I, J Os ep.h«.S clh-a.t,e,r. �� �'' a•1 3+t.',' 4cx'pi t l, Y, a,,� Ctigai dl y' l ' being first duly sworn depose and say that I am the publisher .:. :....a.,.a a:.a. '1,i �t 1to'.'^r� <•, . ., . t;- • .: .Elul i D H Zc 5rrMM\\O } of The Tigard Times, a: newspaper of general circulation, as defined �� tw ' ►" 6 d by ORS 193:Oi0 and 193,020 published at Tigard, in the aforesaid couinty and ''A request by t'$x 131shop a°nd�a :. ,r K' • f tBuch' ��,y�{�/y.ti mti ,rb n' a..... n « 1,ik � ,, '. '" i 1 1 Y ; tdT t fo17Y �''•, ` .I '!^ V,�.. ,� .7 µi state; that the legal notice, a printed, copy of which 1$ hereto anneiked, Was Ltd,a r r &4. ,g, i afzi l • A +� ». successI a acid Cb tinter i 1 i,.t " t-ovir 7a ',.., . '• 4, ,,! published in the entire issue of said newspaper for �'[ consecutive weeks In the following issues .::..,a,.a: ,•,,.a....a... Zon f'or iipro ma ety'11 G, {romm .. .. � �b�i?5tri ± t �� ct' e ' J�x y 3 0 and Augu 6, 1980 acres 1oc"ate i the lion hem ' f t ,:��i�d�, i. 'airi a r e s1% (Cb' ' ,+:::r..,:ta.a.as:....raaaa .rra.araaa :.a+.a...,..waa.:rr..a...,..... ..a .a a:.saa a. .aa.a:a ,. rai oIl ?� r' .Y •�}' a:,.a �a as ' "+2ACk `,AX'• b0 1 t#d 156'0,x.2., 0 iii 1 ft ,r, .....aa _.:_. �1sbtl;t 1o"o andat rf QOx�' ' ,,,,, to at re) I!> 4 +. ��, i bey .,.�j�y.�' +��t ��E yi1 ii 1111 S1 r ' A .a 'cot , e d1 rlIetit cif T �s b "subscribed and sworn to before me this da or M , «, ,„ , ','`I,,,,.:':,,',, ' # 1/4 , uet h ;, rcr � U � aneten�, f, ... 1 -•r....•a �� i ofxTransporteition'roi a Stti,sitl e 1-ands,i • ..a ., g,� , .r gib C0 1st , t • rmit �w" �y b p _° ,a... a....G,�r!� •.N Hof r,K w tt tip �i<t ,` r otary Pub Oregon t d� cA Farm o i e i,t a d 'f vll ii.Ji i i'ilC e aX e j� la (Wash o , y cam±irl:',, '-• cxpirt s JULY 6 19183 .d ai'401 24AA,,Tax;,dts.20O Arid 50 'j 7�� ,#� t1�3 00(01,4:.,I, ( 4008 - Publish July 30,,Aui;.+ ii, ' 1, ^��980) t. t • �r i1 • • I ` y l u m . 1 ■ ,N , « ^ • a.•yw.�•j � ::T.4.1.p- y.. , ..L . w.a iMC�'� '�e Y�Ff�`.:..k. .,.r.�. d,t�:Yi�'U�Y - • 4, 3 ") 11 Of 04-U r.h Ivnue V Tigara„ ureon 97223 August 6, 1980 Tigard Council Tigard Planning Commission . * Subj: !..!ain Street Commercial, G.I. Joefs proposed complex 1. I hrlve been following the above pro,,osod development with mixed feelings and wieh to eNeress m",y opinion as a businessman on , 1.:ain Street Agard. • 2. Main Jtreet has two obvious bottle necks at each end. There is little that can be done about this. Ji3nals on 99 are not going to significantly holy the problem and as traffic grows, the bottle neck eitua'..,ion will 3et worse. 3. It is my concern that Main Street does not become so strangled at each end that people will not want to shop on Ilain Street. 4. Business on 2ain Street and adjacent streets are mainly small low traffic generating ones of low,density. If it is fair to compare business development to residential, airi Street is primarily single family like dwellings. 5. The Albertoon, i:cDonalcLe, Payless center is an exception and it is easy to see the traffic problem that this development has generated and that will continue to get worse, 6, Tigard City 1,?lanning has stated that the new complex will w e tir generate an f,ditional l ,000 vae —les entering and exiting the complex each day. The major businesses are high traffic generating with only 8,000 sq. ft. of retail space planned for small business. 7. The planning Commission denied the orinaI petition based on 4 th 6 6 the traffic difficulties t are obvio u at that end of Tigard. rbend.ing Johnson Street through the developrront or bbhe. presently proposed strnt on the 01,d of the com-)lo x near the Tigard Library te,ie only voiding the real problem, 1,t ich , - a. The proposed covelopmen6 generates too much traffic for the site and that end of Tigard. 8. The solution is to re,-,uire the area to be dovelo)ed for low traffic generating business or at least a majoritr of the retail footage be aZloeated for that typo of business endavor. 4 4,4 • ? 6 4.4 .9. 1.4 64 y, xae de -oers are 'et,uuint tot,ether larba „Jiecoe ad, ropertt to acco“odate only larce business which le apnarently to their own benefit even though it is not a natural development for Tigard. , a 10. Iam a Je1e,;xber of 7.",:'01 and do not believe that th9 naster clan has ar±Lci9ated the difficulties�.ficulties and probl rG s of d©velcp- • in; that end of !ruin 5troet particulary with the trpe of business proposed. 11. It would be ciffico`► select a worse site for the complex of four 4riajor businessose 12. 'Sven though the rights of the property owners must be considered, the impact ia so great in this ca e, that the city must take action that is in the best interest of Tigard as a whole, keeping in mind that sore room must be left for future traffic increases that u Ll undoubtedly occur. Sincerely, { 9j)eb-610, •.. y Joe D. i eooia P.S. In conclusion my wife says, "I already try to stay away from Main Street because of the traffic and parking. • •• E i yt if 1 A . •N f ;0 .• , '1 7:4 AW i'•v:;. 4 .fv.F4 ) tF: i,.:xli . - „♦• . n • r • w ✓ k ' MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION August 5, 1980 • Page 7 OTHER BUSINESS t *** Howard announced the Bishop/G.1. Joe's development on Main Street would come before the commission for final approval next week) Aughtt 12, The Commissioners did not feel it appropriate, in view'of A- the lack of attendance for various reasons of commission members at the three traffic study sessions at the USA offices, and in view of one new Member on the commission, to take final action at the meeting next week. It was the Consensus the August 12 meeting should in effect be a study session where the applicant's responses to the commission's expressed concerns would be considered and evaluated, *** Howard called attention to the redraft of the Planned Develop- . tent Dietrice ordinance, which he recommended the members study and then act on at Some future date, He explained why it was drafted in very siMPle, very straightforward language. *4* HoWard presented a letter from W. L. McMonagle asking for 12 lots in SUmmerfield #14 instead of 11 as originally planned. He •. . eXplained certain accost problems which need to be addressed, but expressed confidence these can be Worked Out to the satisfaction of all concerned, speaker gpVED, and Funk secended, approval of twelve instead of eleven lets ih Shmterfield #14, with details to be worked out by Staff. The motion carried unanimously., 44" Howard called attention to his memo of duly 30 concerning the remand by the city council to the planning commission of the Copper Creek deVelopmeht. There will be an ihfertal study sessieh on this at the AUgust 12 meeting. The president ADJOURNED the meeting at 10;15. *ocippdri* • 11 will! I • • •t; P.O. BOX 127 • TUALATIN, OREGON 97062 • PHONE 682-2601 • RUSSELL WASHBURN, CHIEF g P vts OCY. July 31 1980 Aldie Howard, Planner City of Tigard City Hall Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: G.I. Joe's, Main St. Development Dear Aldie: I reviewed the site plans for G.I. Joe's Main Street Development. The plans that were ..reviewed WerCiPlans on file submitted July 25, 1980. These plans are approved as submitted for emergency access and hydrant location. Changes asked for in previous site plans are now included. Water lines and site hydrants will be installed as shown ( on Tigard Water District plan for the site. Yours truly, Jo eph A. reUlich eputy Fire Marshal JAG:dm • . r•ort,^1,V,06 •r AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING • STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Viola Christensen, being first duly sworn, on oath despose and say: That I am Secretary for the Planning Department for the City of Tigard, Oregon • That I served notice,of hearing of the T'gard Planning ". Commission) ` - - .e ..� iiY.'. . 'e,41- '�,, .GHQ- - /, .j /9e0 following he attached is a copy Marl Exhibit A) upon each of the of which the persons on the g P 8 day of T r 198 (, by mailing to each of them at the address sho on ie attached list (Marked Exhibit B) , said notice y1s hereto attached, deposited in the United States Mail on the day of / , 198 6 postage prepaid. Su)ascea,bdd. #end: sworn to before me on the , day of , " gz tt't all (rr?ti M $ Y uy n • « �° Notary P lic of Oregon •My CoM is sion expires ._ �• .' • • ) • 1 , A . ' .. . ., .; •••.r-,' . .... •. 4 '• • . ' 4 .. • . • . : .1 . „ - • ' . i., , r 4. irk- ,.... 4 , i ' 1 I • • ■ t • 't. q , , f i. ? :Z:' l' ' *'''' ' . : x t t , 4 i A . „, 1 . NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS MEETING ON TUESDAY, : AUGUST 12, 1980 , AT 7:30 P.M. ,IN THE BOARD ROOM OF TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT ' , ADMINISTRATION OFFICES, 13137 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY, TIGhRD WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING . APPLICATION: APPLICANT: MAIN STREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD. OWNER: J. B. Bishop and NPO #1•, . 10505 SW Barbur Blvd., Suite 303 H. J. Buchholz ', Portland, Oregon 97219 SAME ADDRESS ... REQUEST: For a General Plan Review and Zone Map Amendment from C-3M "Main i. Street Commercial" to C-3MPD "Main Street Commercial Planned Developnent .... DistricM' on approximately 11.51 acres. 3; LOCATION: The southern end of Main Street (Wash. Co. '.i.:ax Map •2S1 2AC, Tax Lots , . ) 1600, 1500, 2200, 1400, 1300, 1200, and a portion of 200 parcel #3) . ri.:2;',__L ,__ " -"'"...=--"'' — , ."' , t..-"---"1"."--•"'::..7...77.7,---- aft 3. ! . x,..,' •-•,, i 2c.—_ t1, j 4 43 sO.N. ... ,,,4. .St , .- > 4011,,, SA PFAFFLE sr. t' ' Ora— 1 r .- I' ' * ,1 7 ' '• ' D ,..."-e) ,'•'•'1 3.VS. riaJtact rr, ; . a a . 0 W Z:4=3 • ,l"....... ■ • ''. 1 I n ;My cti,,,,,,.". ,....1 rul.M.0................. W.7... 411(\ > . sc.rr., F. 4 • • 4, s w i t 1 % . ';'• '11 '‘t4' ' '5;'• • - - .',, 4›, so L.* vs I.A ,..0 , 411. '. .' Ils ., If 1 , s , • Sri coir•ELA 7 N.1 woe et if lk.. '. k ' DUVALL Si. .1 1 4, 1,F..kinwo • ,o-4 :41. ,,,:.• sr.,..' N., V .4, N •4>,,, vi.ka 9. I! . • . , ,,.........„, \.....:i ____ .., , _.... xo '4'' _i_303 Ts 1 ., ..., /..,...,/ .4."'IcAlg'Erile1 ST. .1.: .*'.... '* 4, 4 0:41;00100:. -Ft 2 ,... s•..,•-•,,,,_,•-' 30,,,s, , Itano CT. ,..., . 4141144.1, 1 iji‘,..,' '...... \‘..: ...--- --"" ... i* . ...■--''''' to ...,.....,.. 1 .., E7,-.19. 0 '~-,.."-.., ciy. ...■ r A"Pa."1 ' . ' +.'" 11 GT.'..+c':i\s. •• .., --",.■,‘ 4.. ',1r/11111 ge .4 4. 't 1 ,.1 U r ST, , 0 ' tzt.....„, vr-e: _ ,,,c, i 1 ‘1 . T. 1 4% ' SW.OM ST. I iii.,- _____ • : .4., ,,..,e1; ,... . '..,„. 0 sw. v, ,‘,....., ..........— .t., , ty 11.11, , . I . . ' ..1"). ll. a ----,* • . ' . ......"24...1.................... -„,, E ....7., . , .. 4,..—BAN;—Tr: „. 4*-4 •S' 24/rs`•,..,, del., ,,,..1.:.s -:. „ • tt• 4to, •0,' ,,,,, 4,'4, •••,, L, ''''''...,,,,,..„... / if S'` yi• t‘e0/ . e 9 4 1.. .j' 40' ' wo. .s ,,,, . ii. 4. \\"1 t HAY ,i. cof4440 _,.,..,•••S' J - . i 't . ........--„,..1 0 , . , I rat, -. . , 44, t4litSo ' ' . d _ ' sr. stiN FONMER et „14. .. ,,, .40„ .,,,1/44■o y;‘,., .44, ,r,..4, , A / Defog* Om. 4 41- s•s.cii,. ,...t.""; ,i,•0 )1 c4'• / 4 11/11111 54 1 N ••zr. :-,..._, . A • • Iv ,fr•,, * /N. ' r ,,, 4 •, . i' ..,''v tit VAR.4s st •=7,,,„.41, 7/ sw 111101M sr 44." ' 4 '• / Ntt.44, . 4„ , ,,t4 " j L t iiir_acro,K1 , ,, .‘ -,., ,,,,, A44,04,3,< . . - c. 0 ,....,.., 4.. 1,'.'4' i ,i, /, 41• Itto -I . . .4 cp- --""6,,,i r. '40 ',,..ct• 4,• il =:'• 'c',* ' . ' -I t ca,o • I.i l'it ' ' ' A 341, e'iktitiog sT ,-7. , ri,-, ost v 4„,,, sw. .A411, -------7 zli .•,, %%4 1, - ., Man', ! il W ....1?ci „ (A04004 IlSk A)* ibit . t*, af t Yi tUCItt4i6• • i ti• .it , • , / ,.)11 I SAM •.' 0 Ot 4' . .7,..‘.: i :ii.I.Vibii .- V! --..-. 1.0'..... ' / :-. 1.i.1 ‘04"ad v` Odi , a— , e_ ,i, 212 ,----'" .. 4, ,„nis, 1/ I e ' . r • • l" tr' PoilA4 ill, oi, we 4....... ir ticoorIALLI , rri ,..) :; awl tt4 a4SUbs, t' ----• -, `41,..,, ti . ttLjiltiaLt a',rd v• P r, 114 Am,„ _ --• pro*wt. .■. .4 t ii0iiiiiAletriat LAM i 7 7, .. ' - 1 A I! .if ' ...., 4;14 , .........--,....... ' , t tt•.,,. ....Vt`iit'ituTuoma ' TR8 PUBLIC ARIM oN THIS MATT 8A WILL at CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES oV PRoC88UP, 8 ) OV THE PLANNING COMMISSION, ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST /N THIS MATTER MAY ATTEND AND BE REARDi ORi TtSTI,MoNY MAY UBMITED IN WRITING TO BE ENTERED INTO THE RECORD 0V THE INITIAL HEARING. tHoUtb ''oti 018A TO APPEALE A WRITTEN LETTER ADDRESSED TO TH CITY RECORDER MUST 88 RECEIVED 1 . PRIOR TO THE! EXPIRATION OF THE TwEINTI8TH DAY AVTER T88 DECISION °V THE 148AlaMO, IV NOT/d8 • ... TO APPEAL 18 NOT RECEIVED WITH/N TW8NTY: DAY.si THE AdTIoN /g VALID. •••4.4,o, FOR PURTHVR /NVORMATIONi PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT 639,-4171 ..-1 ". CITY OF TIGARDE 12420 SW Main Tigatdi Oregon 5122 . ,,-,,,,.,....,,. ,.....,......,_,.......,__. ..... ,.....______L.... ........—',... ,,,, , „„_: 4. -. .,,,,,,, S . ' ' ,,• . 4L' V.. ' GA f, i 1:' 1 i'' ( il a� d �y r` may. '.10 y 1. {; A 1 I, _.5 e/L) ‘1.4P1/ ' , , 1 r., nuAa-. .:.•ee.-a.•.ry-.a -:K. x o.�.a. ..x +. ,+,.,,.-,+ 4 kxrxa,,:. ..x. - .� r . r, , Yw • ♦ 11. 1 �,cr C .,or r• � . 0 �f• . , . . . ,„ . .. , . . . ,, r.,,,, ,, ..„ i , • , . _.“._ .m.-"&,)27..e. .6e...e, 1, 1 .. . .. , .. . ,. 1 1,2.02 s(-L), mcuAl i..,/,_,--/c? S.. et)"Ocz-e4-74 , 1 r re i ay,_ D U 4 coo ,:,. /pS2(..� , u c• ;% ._ • .,_ • �,:.SeAJ .r;Y�c ` ,,, ,.,• . /A_,04,,a,,(i)a-ilei1.., _ 41.. . .,4:0 4-e,.,.. „ / a:/te/ ' "/#1 ' - ' 1 • s , , i n• 7 , . 9,I2A, . . . ' ' .... , ?3.6,,, ..S , pE54 q ,. � - ..� .AV--?!72--- ' , , i ,, / 6.1.t.' .•.c.:"...16,2 • .. ./. ',?,4t2' .4.0 _SW , ez.e/)/. e , ,.. .._ .. _ // / . '',' ,/e.")...e6eteid./ye."0..:‘,/,-. i, f , Y( K . • I I • 4.7 „ii, _ ..Av.,.2,..M1A+,<r,•••••.•44 ..4,:.4, 4:•44.d.nY.,r,...r»Y• ,,.•�.. w•,.w,,„.,. .«w�.•... v� . ^-+n++.-..w,.�w•�+ykrrtA,,w P�+mm�0.w,xai�•n•I�e ,.+.eu..«r.r..,.,,,aut� , -,- *!� . .4 '. " . -r - .........■■■■,,,■• ........ .... 11,.......■•.,■.T..........■■•, . ..4. ,-, A . 4 'V. / . I PLANNED DEVELOPMEN1 FILE CONTLNTS . ,. . ,... SEE ALSO_me-Pie PD 881 9-8l LEFT SIDE RIGHT SM.:: Assessor' s Map 1 Maps/Preliminary Plat 1 , Notification Logal DescripLion/Dood :.... Surrounding Property Notice of Authorization ..,. , ..,...1 , . Affidavit of Mailing Copies or Correspondence with Applicant . , Agency/NPO Notice Public Input Affidavit of Publication ,,.._k_Aguncy/NPO Comments 4-2210 (14644,0 Articles/Notices from Ti /Staff Report(s)-Dato(s) ‘'-c -it' , Application/Narrative 1/Minutes of Meetings , 4........h...... .*.;,...., rinal Action Notice lannin commission-Date -0 CounlDat Lc.0-60 City ci - e c, II Ra-ati45Wkj 7_7776 9 Resolution No, Date ......41.........4.a......40.0 I . ' Ordinance No, Date „........_,..........„,........i... h' .. . /Correspondence After Approval 8UMMARY A Approved / Denied at-At/ill i'milev&-/0/19-07-e- 'v(---c' ,.., No of Lots i Preirit le 67463ePP eg a" , No of Phase$ I, S PO C I.a I 8 6 t bat C k S .. Plat Recording i 0 . .) Nathe . { Book/Page No 6 Date ..........,---.......4-0,—,. ,. “........_ , .. Additional Phases Recorded i , (Date) (Book/Page No!) (book/Page No,) .. , ‘ KL/bjs(0616P) i , d d >nllllpl!' -�� ?7-' / w ,.. 2 t 1 '" (.,t,l ,'-,"" 7 r r i 9-7')V Z/, (-95"r I i 77 '? ?rril /V: 7771:" "e) c'QC c-a •6'121 9 ..,"07.Cr--cf. '3 c /7.6:F4 •VA./.0;ii?,-.2.4y /02,2? i rY h 2F) cr-zo Q2/ D 02 , :;09 1-c ?y A 4'r / ,71 (9 I A / (aa/ �- 1 org A.C'e :** "^.•_.}...gin ,, .. So c31 * • dS wait ••••Tr*”..rry„ n • M•III1( M*, . •.• ,.., , •. ' o a • , , . . . . . • ; - • ,,, % ' .• . . , v.- . t■ 'it t .1 , .k. , . #0 4 ; . 1 ■ , to' ■ I .. \ I!! 1 , ' tr i . . I' It it ' 1 ( < ( ( ( ( 41 ( ( (, f N. ....E .',.. 4 ...- ( ; 414.. 4,------. N. . . , • ,• 4:.-.1f): ' 0 ! . • ' 4 ., • • .34'0■:,7.b 1 , ;15:/ e2 Ac.7 ^-) 4c7z,z` , ,i. 1 i it., • k',1'...'''' -* 4 .,;',7, •' i,-.44 il'..7..s.2.0., • ' 1...\ i ) //os, r. IC,A, 2a Ct4O .--.9..6•P. ...... e'6 L*.... . • I.4,I.,14* ••••-ti.,,-,.'',. i. • ,. i (1 .o. _64 , ,..,..... . 1 . ......-- .: i {' 1,..1...1,,,,,4••••••...'-*-='..,. . .\' - 1 .. : ,..4.•i,i',... ..,,,•,-;rf.. ..,„ . ji. • ) 4. ' c''''. ''-4.:.• . 1 ,. , s 1.: '.;:,,. ,Q.10,-;.t.,.,• .. : ,.... ...■ 1 X i 4,.•••,. -,..,......_.. " % • .. .. .,',.,, Tr' ., . . Li(:1;° :PL/1... ..4.° 1 . . '''' .--"""".-• ...,...;:... ' .. .,4 ..) "‘ 64_,) -r.:7-77-) A52.4 CO ://OCV / e.41../CA& '---' 1:••%15""" • .,-... *r' . i '-:1'-:1 . . I • • . • /"5'f0e2,V. Q.Z? q 7CC55 • I 0 .210 Or r .or 1 . 1. . . 6,2 ...t.---/-• '-4•••■■••••••••14*••■••-•••••• .. , , 6 • • 0 t i el. S ,. 7at41 ,.6 4 • 1,..Q... ..L. ... 2' 571 cf,.) /7 • , . • . . . , . . . . . .... .. .. ... ,..1./. ......5—th& 5J /47/20, ,7a. . .....„-- ,.. ct . • .. . . • i't, . / e9S- So), 1.7cciiee,od . a , 7 3‘4d2Q. 6 • • , ,..61-7.0)') 90,s- . . 0 6:7. 0spoc//nc; vic ,. , • • . • . S ' IO• • .. . ...,,..... • ) ..*I..' • /C:74,.r?00 SC-C,..) •V,„.Ci-r...i- ' ., • -.... , , . ..... ...1' L7..q . 44i .y... — - ..2ji • „. . 4 ..,...4 .. .., . -- /Le' .r ■ ,•! , ,',,Lt.'.,'4, I .:.. :„ , ( ,a6m, .7.2...., i X ,. . i .• . • • 41,! • , 1 1 ''''r • . A .*,,,il :'1..“12744;,,i'L'..li'-t,..;:ii. . .4 4 ..4 it. G.'.. ... •„.' ' 2 36) i-, ,-....,..44i; j'', ."•:. cc,' 4AA / 0-(.../....." , ,, 4..•t,,. • ■ ,., j'fr,, - ? • ' ‘. ' , ‘,'' '' i ,.,:.' ' Z4 . . '.,,, 4 ••••41..1',1 i, .,.,. .6A . . , fr:/ ?) ' jig' 0,-0.'75, 4y / 0 ,.) 50 4, „.,„.... " . • , 4 . . ,' , .. . ,..7 . , ,. . , - a . a , • , • , , ,••.' • , . , . . ,. . , • ".".-"--;.' '...+`.':",°•‘,'':``,,,,4,•4(..1'.'•'-a."''',^^,+••;•••''.--.-L.',,-........,......,,•4,,,,,--......:•.:•;•••:•444 .,:4•44,,.4,4,4.,A4,44:4,-4;i4;, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,...;.4.....,..„,,,,' ' '. . . 'r '•"' '' ' "'- , ' ' ',• - . , 7. •'■-'...,.. -,.,,,,,,, i 'I - \ , ', .;,.“.••:.A,:: , . .. . • , . 0 1 * • .1.f.'''''' ,*.,-,,, 1 , \ , . . o ...,- , ,, , .1 ‘ ... o.• ,,„,,,, . . , Of' . . , , ' • ' 1. 0 t• ..,'.. e. . % .. ''` • '1/4.• 41L '4,. t k, 1/4 ( 41 A t k t t t _ 4, ‘ ( t. Ito •2 a „ 4.,„ qv, • 1 , , . („ 4 . . •. . . „ 0 ' ---...........„—••••••••••„—„•—•.* .?D 6. -7.3' . _ ,,_ 3 .,......._..., . ...,,. ----- 2 cll ,,.. ■ / i ',...•....6 L•• 1'/" . 7.1 1.(•4...,4.. ./..-. ...L,., ..r.-.aL --.e" -, .:, 4i ...,.... ., i t P•4 i,,.-1,,t A,',...:.,....l —"i',4. e ./ /1 — J . ! / I 4J 1 ).* . / ! / ni z ., ,• 1.A4kitsc ..P.ri . 4-- 1 ., ...,....,......t........„. 4,,,,, - • 1,, • ......• -- ..:. , - . .....,,, 1 il; . t--• .4,;:1,.At. i koters-7() Pc6t.„.. • /64,4.,,, . •„„,„," ,k‘......i .. i $, 4 4 arrgit or,: • • . 1:1.4...*11 7.,,- 1 . . (.... i I 1. . , ..,.........,......................, 2 i.22C/ I • , • •••••' .."...., ri-oi ____,--"c?,, .„., ,/• ,.., ,.\ 1/1)(27.' , . __,/,,....x. :,.....,.....; _-_ _, .. . . a . . • ..................,........,.....................1...........................1 • . • • 1 . i 9 /..cci ...' , ,,,,,, I, 1 so ' ,..f.„ _, ..... —,— 6,....". 4 ' :. o /4.:,._, /1.32.A1146 O't 1 1 . a-c a/id • . . • .. .... , ii/6,00sc....) .• ° • ' • J42 2.S 1 - _...)c(..4.,, 622 ... /Ivy e.., ,..,. .---7--C.„..._...C..,..... r.t. 4 . . . .. .. ......... :. 4......... - . e i 1 1 93 _SIL) 9.‹ ,_ 42tA.F— (.... , . N . • . . .62:621.1 I• 111 / . C.....111.1"1#.4....d....1/°...H....L..C"7 C 4./..V24.÷ ..•..,ia 4.1.4.,4......a ••.■...1 ire.„Di /4.(' ,c02.,,,.., ,............ .. ...... ............_, . . . Q4, L, .& 076 . 2 y,s,9e & 7,./..., ,,i- z..-. ..L . . ... :. . . , ., . • .3.20_, /,.SE. iCj " w •• ,....., - • ,., /i,_, , icz,9:;,t.J. ..z) )50/ / 77...21,_ 4. 's. ,. ., ...... I ---- . , . . I 03 ,c.Y_A ') 4..../in......6)V2 j ,i4'..• '1.,.1 1 1 Veir...'i . • . .............,...,*..../,/, 1 1 • 2-4 S i r ? 4 C....) / e- 0 - . )t Ili-:-,.-.„'",ti• ' *:al-'14;t4'414635**1:7,-404.1.:14: .4 I 4 't .z. , ■ '.1.:■ . 4..................—. • i1 i,, .... . /,,,,_? , i. j 76) -:..) 4.4..■/ r•-•-'CLL /Cd.,-/C-4-4 JA i I. ., . .•i..•* • t • • ,. . • , • 4 r .. • • .• • • t• , 4. . • wt , • . ry,• •,-,,I ..P I I., .r.,. .'''''..:••,..,''.-...•'......`".'.......... -4,...,......,vvowlen.insr.poloorra...............4. ,. gIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMMIMIIrSIMic _ .. • -, ,-, ,_--..-.'-- - - ,:-=„-j 1,f . . - - :.T.,____ _ . , --. --.. - 1.,-. . , -. _ -,- • . -- -- . .- , -_ _ _ -.---- .__. .. - I ...., :. ... _ . _ - . -- .:' -._ .. - -. ...... • ,_ ... .,.--.• - 1-.1--11,1j ' - I r i cV 1=14 MI --- . 1 --, .--- .,. ; --....i i I. tr, 1 .1 , i i m... rt- . .ii 1 ‘ — t__________I 11,11,1:11--)ti / I \\ ; alas . ..- , „....: L. i .. - qat - 1 ' - \ i - 1 __ ___ _i____ r . ..)--, ? , i _ .1 s II 14; 1° -N2eL 1 . r - I- ._ Wm V ' - 1, 1 ___ Rig, 9 x . - 1 = -- :11, : • I I - 1.- . ` 7:am.. .—= __ vo 1--NCI-- .* 1 .- - - 1 ' 't r`-:---1 al - ' - 7- -. b -n'e;i: -, meal • L i_ 1 --- a j_ KN, ,--- ' \,. -x. c--, - , : -_ - , ; -:--, 1 -. ...: --2 - a .-- A 114 114111,V:-. 4 1_ , ---,..._-,--,. -.....,.._ 1-- f 11111'EMI XIS II WI \-- kW ii q l'h' Iii _..,_ ........_____ ..... ......._ , • ,,• _ 4 ir).7 ' '. f fritix:: ara• a- .-..14,11 -, ._,, -- --------'1,-------- - - Ng 11, a .... - , . . ...-- mt / ,> ., - -10 LA6, . ,, :_ ,a i .':. 1 , ___.. .._-,'" -- . , . 4 . y. i\i" - ii t . . . , ,_ - - 4 _ _______y --_,----------T f,.i. ... . - , „. , -f. mi -0/t ...-,-- - I . .,_ .,, • , 111 ITE:17 ....,... : / 44 4.....,_i..4. ,..., .„...... .1 ,-----. I. , _ -id , ,, rt.- _si watte -- ... ..----..-, .....,___ . 1 •tia A Ai Nt ..... t,4) ,, 4rpAep*4 41,.:,. ii._ 4 i., I -1 , . _.... _.... 9 - - 11 . 4t, _ . ' - - lit- , \\T .1 0 / fE --II -- 'f*- . S to i_.is. , -. ‘ Iti*. - • #.#4,/ .,-- ..., , - If 1 . . , ttri! 0 ... . . i____ It 4Vtei.4,. 1111) ■ )4 v.ai.- ir, /: am& - - .->.....„,..... ' -7 I. 25s,......,-...:._ - - ..,, . 1!!o: , .4*,.: .•--:„. i-i —. . ____„, fi Irr, -1,- **A0-7----- 41 Nilfr. "** / I- .. — . Is . I.. / 1 - • cr--..,--7-, 1--I .i. lir i '-', -<-- .. N * - . ), .' --NO 0 -41* , , 4,, 1 ril. „us '•'-i, Ai — I t ve. i eiliev• o, !-. . [tr 2 ri a ii i ti.. -t (,_____1 --1 r-------- ------------- I' . ,Nit, II—_i_ST/ 11 .lall__ - IS . 1 i ----- '--- 7 - ''. li--. mr.".=-. A 11 111, 11111419] ili 1! 1 -- - - ---- - LL L131 — ,--- -.'--- .- .C...-:- --i- A4 , ---1---.--T- -- I,- _ - -- - -. - I- - , li . - . - . .. ' 1 ' ' J 4_-___ , N al, _-_-=:-91i-c-Til- _nrti, • \ Ape fa ),- --......_ . .„--, .,,c4.,42 * 19/4,ma _____ la Mir , VS- „/ ...._ '- -64\y_4 so , *Aga ryirmil„t--7-7 III $ ,_ ‘ ,‘ .,,... a I ----- c., --...1 '' . (- V■ . - j11'• Ir 111 '11 rip .... ..,. .1(S1 . \ Tin , ,of_it., . --- ---'-\ : - _L II It f,, *4 ..... _:-ir v. ,I■ 4 --- . FIT); - 1 li 7 z- .___._ _____ I - _.f __r-, i as • _, - -u--- .., AN . <. . * ,frigi 1 ii: - i - - = 1 ' • —1 -- - ' 'r 's' r ' r I 17:- ' ' ''''' 1: \ • ' - rm I:11 ,... -7 r ,,q0,-- .il....., . - ,‘ 4-44,-, , ',___-- r).-- / k----■,. ,. . -f , ,, i:‘,....- ' I' li. ( " ''' _ --,--/-1-1 ' I: '. - . -." \ 111$ 1,1 .1 . L -J -1-... , . II I., •, .th'• :-,---L---. - 1_. ...-44'11 - oy .,-4. - .../..- - 'N• . , C Cgc"....-j _..., r------ - .- t ,.. __lir_I 1PN ' tz-v[1-. - ' t z / : ____________ t%.-\-- ----7"1 .,-4\ 7 . r .., .. . : , "'"''"F.zr,„Trl.T11\ - :-.-:., 4....1' _ _. 1_1111_11 • ____::: i .; ,____::-: -1 ---1117:- .,_ . . .. ----------V' .- .... ),, ma. ii ‘.antigsua-_ - j . I .c_i____ - . - ; 1 ig ,- - .- _77_. _q _ 1 :- 1F-1RTI - --- ' , ... - ---] . - --3---- ' ' - al Li L I ' " • WILL6 C�ILHAM AIRCHITECTS & PLANNERS P,C, 3777 8.E, w I�ILV'JP,UKIE AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON PH,(503)232-1 195 MAX P,WILLIAMS ARCHITECT, A.I,A, • LOUIS C. GILHAM, ARCHITECT r July 25, 1980 4 Frank A. Currie, P, E Public Works Director P . O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE A shared 50 ft. right-of-way, North property line , Bishop/Buchholz Property Vicinity of Mains Johnson, and 99W, Tigard, Oregon Dear Mr Currie: The enclosed plan shows a proposed 50 foot right-of-way on the site 's North property line with 15 feet of the right-of-way on the i.: g p' , adjoining land not in the Bishop/Buchholz /Buchholz ownershi We ask that your consideration p � of this plan Will include implementation of this shared benefit. If any eoestions arise; please feel free to contact either myself or any other member of the design team at your convenience . • Respectfully submitted, WILLIAMS /// 'L'AM Ao•or Ron Grosjeari, Architect RG/uas encl . .... . . .. ....... . 1•rl�• 1 r{r,.f1.J • ;, • • t , WILLIAMS �� AM 1 ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS P.G, • 37-77 S , MILWAUKIE AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97202 PH.(603)232-1195 I • key'} ° r.I/rW4ke.t ` " ti MAX P, WILLIAMS, ARCHITECT, A,I,A, LOUIS Cr GILHAM, ARCHITECT July 25, 1980 • :.•, Tigard Planning Commission c/o Aldie Howard Administrative Asst. -Planning Director P .O . Box 23397 IJ� Tigard , Oregon 97223 RE General Development Plan. Review Application, C-3-M , PD; Bi shop/BUchhol z Property, Vicinity of Main, Johnson & 99W, Tigard, Oregon • Ladies & Gentlemen The attachments to this letter include certai n exhibits addressing the required points in the City of Tigard planning ordinance 18. 56 . 030, for a general development plan review of the • petition plans and p program. ofany questions arise during the staff review, thereafter, please feel free to contact either myself or any other members of the design team at your convenience. The attachments arts the following! P-20 PerspectiVe P-21 Landscape Plan P-22 Site Data Map • • P-23 Land Use Plan 500 ft , outside site f P-24• Parkincl Plan P-26 Existing topographic map P-26 Tax lot map Respectfully Submitted, WILLIAMS & GILHAM 1 Ron rrosjean, , rchiteet RG/ba5' encls , I' . •`.. ♦IN.rd k.?Nfll kN' I+k�{ ?+YYpYnerN "- �}y.K..M• .'�i - .. ,,,,...-...•', ,. ... - •. . .. , . . . ' .-, :../ , . ,• . .. . • ., '■ l'' * M.:,11::Orl' .....4,1 ■ ' ' i , ,_• • L ILF ' • O' i„ . Al9PHITECTS & PLANNEFIS P.O. IA It: - S .E. M1LWAUKIE AVENUE ,PORTLAN1), OREGON 97202 , PH.(503)232 '1195 . . ' - - . :' . .'.'•,-. ,.. . , ,.,.., -",,i,', ' ;t4•lk,',.14 MAX P, WILLIAMS' ARCHITECT AAA, • . 1 . , LOUIS C. OILHAm,ARCHITECT ' • , - ":'.' : , . . . • 1 - ' July 25, 1980 • ,. . , ,. . . . . .. . , , , •.1.' . , . —,,-, y „ ' , Frank A. CurTie, ' PiE . ' • '- .. ' . : " - ' ' '-'1' . • ,, L . Public Works Director . .- 1. P.O. Rox 23397 . . . , ' , ..f.. ....J Tigard, Oregon 97223 . . . . ' ' .' . , , ..,I ,. • . . , L , , RE; A shared 50 ft. right-of,way,„ , ., , . , . North property line ,' Bishop/Buchholz .Property Vicinity of Main ' Johnson, • . 0 , . , and 99W, Tigard, Oregon Dear Mr. Currie: The enclosed plan shows a proposed 50 foot „. right-of-way on the site 's North property . , line 15 feet of the. right.of-way, on the adjoining land not in the Pishop/Bochholz . ownership . We ask that your consideration '!. of this plan will include impleMentation of ., this shared benefit , , ■ • If any questions arise, please feel free to . , contLe;t either myself or any Other member of the design team at your convenience , i.. , Respectfully submitted, 11 WILLtAM5 t ' JAM <9 ( 1, '., Ron GrosJean, Architect, 11 R0/bas encl , [1,.! ......,'. , 1. ,.. . . . , •11 , I , '''''''''';.;;;.;".4.;;; ;,,,,,,....,:,,,,,L.:;,;':,12';,:;4■'(iV.,:;;),:,;9.:4,gy;,Ve;;;:n',;',''I.;-'''..;:::.,.;,»,2;.,;::+.,''",;;,....... ...s■::::+1';:.." 1 .1';:;;,:w=',6'..4;;;;-0, 1;4t',Z,i144';;;;':'ft:;:"A.i:4:1:+1,,','.:';'''''' ''4::::''*;1'..T'....'"'1'",1.:1"'""'" ''1 :' '.' :'1''5 , .. A . . . • , . . , .... ,. , . . , . • , . . . .. .. .... .. . . . . . . . .. , ... . . . . . • • :-.- .., '4. ., , ,, . , . 4414‘■ . , ,,.. . ,........J....e.....1-';'.'''' '' ''. 7 '-.... . ',.•'-: , . ' - .--"....1 .7.7,.71.'.-4-----s...,7!---',',AI**.,,J,"•,–-4,"',......./' . '' . - ' - ' . . ',,..• .'' ' ......1.00.41,.....--4•-• /,- .." 2:44.4- „ .:','' '''",••71911' ikk 0,11 .' 4 ..",..7l' ' ortigpc.. .. , . ,....;.,:i.,..........i.A.,...,.. .. .,....,9.....„.,,,,,....... ,0.: :.;,.......v--_,,,f,.....-----......... ---.. -_-_--...!-----..--.----.......,,,,... ..4,.N..., . , _ ,- „,....„,......_. 1* •'.11 .1';PI:A..lrel. ••0.414:,H..11 .'""d""..-..-„,.,....01.0„.ja._ 11.r...... .... ......,.... /pr..27.....awili-ArlimM ----'— i 1 zor diti „ ------.... _ MI L.,..n. •••\`'‘.111W ' ,Ilri,,,'77 -f..W,..... 4. ' I._ .--. %;-:'•,..), 114:''..'1.,;.11.4.t.l.lin,-31'%,.1.4',lt,•41..,'.1 ., , -. -- –7 , • 1 —'.ININRA' . ,.... ---..,,,,,= '',,.;'.,,,, .,, .7-1„,., .., .-1.•,,,tifill,l,A.__„,,111;414i.:CI,,egiCif,Ac:...t',Atr:',,Z..11111,: ' I. • it ,, ' 1, ',..:?; ii! 1. -•:-:: : . \`...-- ,, ,, , . ,NA, ,'''..•,,,,V,4,, - Ill ' 11. slii-0,-,6,,%I– i...1.1„W".e•‘-'41 ' , / ;.....':' .111%. "i. , , f.1S1k .1.,...Ale . If, , •4,,,..... .--.-• ... '' "i ilvii4j1,1:e.1 ii ,10141IPIP ll',,itotly,!..5 at,--- „Ai,-,‘ .,„...._.•, ,r ., . e . ,. . .. ,... ,.,...„, ,.... .F, . ,......01 , 41,1' dinui ....:7•44.'• l' *4'4— ,,, :AV.'i', ., , •••3, '''''', Nitor,---....,.. , 4.414„•-.-:-- ---- , .■, -,t.j ,'„,,,,i,011,.,,24,4„...7,„.....4,• ..,„„ ........, ,, .4,-... : ..sm.■ '-.-4..Seit,110'"'.........," ...."',. , 1.-- ir" A ,'Pt' '..-. 4.4,–*Vr°11'lt,',.*4-1 -',....!' ;,,,,...44,......... ..E..4. .,.......,., . •'• . i -••••••'-40',• • ' .I'Vic.......r:Alilliallitilk i.•,iitsRllqllp.7----':\'\'• ' ....,.........:-;- ---7r. ,.IP •"", : .'14 ,'Ail,.' '0.0,;,4',/' -,1101, ,......limminviki:i.arii . _.......... • •,,, ' 44 1,.;, ...i 4'...45--......lot f-Z4c , few .--— •. ":16. 11.9,.11_11—.111-,:- .\.11.1.9•'.t ... ... '?..'. \ —,„..=k---,...„,,, — _.. . ,., ., ,.,... .. io■.... 1/40/0---- ''. • • ,......„ .4 ,,,ir''' '''‘ AC arrow., .. , , ,... • , t ... . owl' ,, If% '440.4'.,..••"'' . . *P^- ',...--. 1 i 4 4,440,41.PA ,.•• ,. ■ -oheititt44,-,..--.. .• . • ., .... . , . , ,..,...,,,..„ _ 1........4..,.,,t,.....ori...1,47,..., ., ............ 4-.., P •.' "'`.,• • ■ ANivitr. "*,"11,11.•,:--." .. • lex..''i."7. '.- ..:=41,1V.eorio'' ' dr.,...e.',. 1;• ,.',` , ...--- ....____, . , . ''' 'A RChilTECT I:E , ,-L,A'LNHNEA..R NEI 1 :ii5ioed ILLIAM J 0 E„ %., to Ts r 1.1.roti.wrii r ark, .44 tilt P All? i , • •• 1,2 TiciAmo oRedic3N .124,witi*Itt . . . , ••••••••■•••••••••••••■••• •••—............... - , \ , ,,;.:11. • •' • .; • .• 4 (•'Ils • (.,,,' . . 4 . I •II , . • .l' 1 • • .2. too z • , il fif ,,, - .,., . ,. 7 0 g E ti •., • ,. ... sot. .41z a., , g 1 : - .. ..ki :fi ig i4 IA la , --"=":-- 0 ' ..1 .. 1 IMI.. IIIIII„___ IIP , • . '"'"1 L.At= ""‘•,..-:LL---,Mr•- iA—' I ...,I . . ) - :1- 11 - ■,4 H in 1, ...:_____ . 1,00 0 •, ,,,yr .,. . \ 0,:•10 4 • , ...,.. ',.. 1:C) .. ...'".L.. '.., b . ‘..., ,.,_,j;.: • ' — _ ,., , . . • ------- .4104§-. t'' ----"'-- ----- ----* • , . ,,g7A,7aste..- , 1.., .- . "'....1.i4.ti ----__ • ..--1-* '. 1 l•to; i•-3'.,.N..3,..4.1* -,.(/R/ 4'Tr*::41';,,,,,s, lit,ic., 741.11,--• iriF'' Tv- 4,-.'.. . 1 -G..-1-' . 7,a,, ,4, .1 .,-N, I es(Vt.44,ak,,-11 "?.. (,`,i .,t 1 Q). i .'ke Qv,;,.,.•4, c a,. .+.,.. .10, • •‘,,,,..1 . 47) .. ?;i„1-..."1 /, .. ,, ...,. ,,T.... , a ..- ..A.4 .. lien,' 's '.• I ' ' ,..,7.•,..., - •,..‘ 0 ii. - 1-' , PAtf .i.A....uL. •••.. t2 ikII ''''''4114 4'.• ' .•••••••••• .•.,I 1 I.I LI . 1/tir tir ),, ,, , ... P., if -, , 4, act v, -., . .1. ,`4 15 ,r 0•.;'.-., . s-asva.MP. , OW' 4., '• 1 0 i. •.t.,..1/2:,,; -oriq.4,"rd„A. .,..,•... , . i IT ,: li„.,4 ,7 -•• .-.t,..Ao. • , •- • . 4. ? "111 t' ,.** - . t" --'7"TAIWZI It ,„„„__) \ Za,..,„ .#. ••• 3 • 0"? ty' / ". - ' i .' ',: ? \„ i.i.Aik . _ • • I , \\Wags\ \ ,.,,,! ..,1:i., , / 1 ..,- k., ie) / \\, v:Irdir,41,4 , ., N. ,, .}. 4,.... „. .. 4,,, 2 t . / ,. kttakv \ . ''.. , i ki : , 1, ..,,' s,.., / if.°A i * • / •,,,,., 4 4,-.'op .• i ' ,. • .4.-a AIL 1 '....(4: . .'...---------4* 7 k-il''''.(I/7C NN,411. . lip . / \,.," i, • k 4 Iil- t // Ocr*h•`• r.'44 ....,fifki . i „, , ., ,'”' , k 7 . 1 "tt2t t//'..,...., . .,S\ .,,., , ,, I i "•,-1 1 'ft•- Pa, kleiffi ----.... ,/ " .),.-,--....7.:'7•71...n....;,1 i.„, ,_,,,,,., i „.„.. (t cllips, . 0,,,,,,, ......_.... I I 7 r r71"1.1"•••. •.41. 141047.V '..t..‘;'''•r rg"\kiliroi,,,. , ...,,,,_ ,..,...: ,,,,_ --.it, - , ,,,,,. / . • ily ' -" ;■, ', '...• .N<' ,,,-„ ,.. ,"------' ".....,„' , 1*- .'. '001104 / ''''*14*"*"' ,I . ,4,3. \ ..,' ‘ r, -e, ,„, ' o .eci„.. . / „. . ,,,, ,,. .... ,,,,, ,.: ) .:`, ' t.'"..,, 41), ,, ,-",..,,,\ , , I / ,„ __ :. .if . ... iii, 4- ..e rt! .,,,-t•_,, A ,_ 0\ ,,,'%,, v .'"•,‘ ,..,, . '-'*. ****'"'".,,, / ,I rt ••—"•• ,,...Y''. ,..'.*- \ .**.Ntt.js 0, ,",,' 04,„, . -"'l .".• ,.)'„,/, .....,.., 1 I 1.-, ., . ,,..,, . ,‘,”„,.. „,..1.... ,,, ,• , i,t,",t „,t....... k II ',.S,",•4 ‘..0. 4.* ,.,,,, ‘ _....„.. , I ',.,'`. Oi,. fro ' 1,\v'' , ::. Ivi; , eA ' .0. ‘,, \' "\,.!4'.5V ..4.% .i,,,,:ik .,". ,r.-k::'.,,\ / .,• , . i tr ••. - ,', ''? .41',.* 4 ..,', - .,,,11, . ,„,,, ,. - ..14. , ... l. ...', 44`.,. *s,r.'; *.':1;j0 e›,,X,'), . -\''. . -.4x1 er:' ,. i ,-. 3: i...„.,4, ,\L, ...,,„,...4141111°''-\41*„.:;;),,•.",.)0:7,14,,,\,,,) n 1 i.i I I: ' ..'•'' 4'' .' ''''> li■, "A,;\\ ''': e" ' . ij.'',"''' \ / i '-- - ,,, .. ....„,,,, 1 ', ,. ■ ) A '4, I ,'I'''•,fi . . •-"". / •At ' I, , "..,, 4S,.. . k'''''');••'1: 41,A.46 ‘t ., a'''''..4,,,A.: .?-3.-.,7'',2,,,".13,1...:......,,-,1',:t.,4:4,,,4,,,..A'0,,,-,...4:: : ''''Szt v.:4'„, .. . 4k. 1 G1 i,,,•• ...•••,. ,....,,, 0.,•,J' ,, . . %. . ! g F .; > ....--,..-3, .1,.,,,,, . k ■ i' '------- ..4.I __ -. eta ,".411,,A , ,...- ., „.• , v. k,,. ..•1 r ve .'1 0.5,4 'g l'' g 515 ' , !: ," . . '',,, *•''‘ #.). v."' I. ; .- / '101''''' 4 ,, • . p, .4, ,.,.\ .., „. ,,,, ' ''.4 ,..'' "-‘'..A* ' 001 • 11:2"0..■ ' * 44:r i '' ';^ ; 3": k..,.... ---,.....,,„.. (OS.`,, . k•>'"A•i'' ' <,...: -.‘",•,•v / -,d, .412vm..--i "' E 4 t E i".; gil'. .p,'. ,...,,,, .---••-„, iiii. 4 ‘' ,•-\''' ' / 4111 - g i I 0.5 .P ii,„ • ..t. 'ii,-7,3 .4v4, rh."--'-,,,,....,4,4-1,. .,,....„.,, ., ,„■ „, ......,,-, , , 1 , . .,:•, cLa • • Im.• . , -,-,.,„_•--,•:-.,.,...._ '•,,i,, '''''.,t•*"' i eit 2 g x A it,,,, •' 1.1 . I 1.1 * ;ii . . -...*,.... i i g ai ,.. ,,t' ,,..„--- -17140, ,"°-. ----.-.,'-,..... ...-,' , -,-- . . 11 • .vI, . . or41 1..th!.4,,,..-,.... --,,,,-,--- ,..--.....,,,.., ., ... . g 4 i 1-11 i ' g F: ...,,,, l' _...,' , AA,*4„,-A ,. .... ....,,,, ." ''`■Itii:' 1 , , 11 lu. 8 ..'3 I .-'k-f '. 1 ' .- * ....,...a:r... ....... *......, . •*....',,,,.. .,. I i I ' '' I "I-. -,\\-\,\ • .4 1,1-4. .i..'. ............._ , 4„.„. ,: ,1 .,., i if 0 LI.'-...i ter ' . iii ..-,.., A , s, ° , ...,.. .. • * • 101,2, .,,„... . ‘,,,..... ..4//'-' .'.1 '11,1"14. l'..",, .*L'• KO:t """..14'■• :'''V.4111)4e:1-'''-''. '' 4' . " '..,•„ -,,,,...:',7 Ilargitt.,.40.t i .7„ ip.,, I ' ‘ .,,,,,,...,........,..4*.„, , ., .,......1,114.411:rz, -.:,-..„....,.„.,,,, . I, :i, , Ii '7.' N.A A \ .1'■,.. ' Ei t? tO II" • .,,,,,......, ...,..,-.-- -:: +Mel:A" .- •,,,,•■..,,A .i, 4,,,,. ' %.,,,i t . . ',4„,,7,14,........, )---;-•-. ,.., ..4„.ri ^• ' "`;'-‘,,t,•it r L....4 Pell I 11.0 11 '' 4 i i !.' 4.,„,...,1 411,SW,I, ,.\".11/4, '. '''''t 4--Ai,-•." ,.. ,, ' ' .a.4, 1 , ..1 Of, .v " a. I . I . --4....,......„----..,_ ...(---, ki ...,•.,4 ,, ,.• .---.4-.);,,,i. ...,,,,....- 4c. ,4 .41 el Li 0 VI cl MI+ 2 '' ---....„:,-....: --., Jr... --, i -tittr.t. tio,4irtit.i.J I it -.i w 1 g ,,,, ,,..44, .: .i .1•.„ .•, 0. -. Lara.... ■a...4.+4.4 441............. ....A."4.W..*.......)0 4........ 7.... ' ..".. . ,1•01.1■••••■■•■•■••,..i.,r.a....7.4.4.,..4_.1,•A...4os I...4,i. 0.4.14, '-.1... ‘...i............m.......-4........... . • ------,..4.4....,4•4,....". Ihir.o..o,. .4•. ,,,,,,,, ,. 14 1..4/....4 i.....i.,...A 474 xerigrill.I.,7i.v1 4,4,7.4.....1 h.........i'.......■1...16.,g.4 ),X ...".{,-.1 1,,.........4.-.,.. Ir...i....41.....,... II..,.,la..., 4...■•■, "......, .,t• o ... ., .......1,.... .6..ill . .4,iv..4..............vv. or.•.......4. .... .. J.4.4......■....,..i...............L.Y....4..4.4..fr.*..... , kN \it 106-4 -• w landscape..... 1 . 2 .. P 1 ____________ .......4-...ls.P.... .{.........,,,,,..°.................-'....''.. .........'.P.... ....... '), • 11'x, f 1 ' • C ....„,,. , , 4 A • C.11.11..N `d /t tti --,-. ,,4 g t xe..) 1._,1 - 1,• �, tcE E6) 2:3, ,t ta li l i ',told ,,,,t- z.-_-, A. v -ii t i, es? .' i. _ r ... .� H: f 0 l I`�.j l!!l -'/,,•►, 1 .1 c, d - \ .. `� A 1 ' ■• . � ' a .,' ; ;i Awiy r 7 `tea,„ I , f � '� .a1 ►� w 1 i - , i �, 3. �, w,. . � �. / , „, .).4 N ' 8 , . . . . 7 ii IL a,I h I/Il I a 11, i , .' g , .. II p , �•,gy . . . p •r + ti /�.-✓k' I.\ Ill 0' '1 y 14 Iltl i r j � '}Di vl ' -- : . 1,' . ..,,. it c - a, 1 l- I [ ,..,.. ,y Y .t I • , '-+1 �� Y I -.'",w..,., I i r I I / —,,-.•- 1 . I I I " I. ,y. S , J,.'k ✓. ,a. ,d • 'w'.l j I. 4. I 4( ....i 1 r. ,,.*a ti} 1- , ./r'' � ,iti t,f ,�t y,+ ., I u r' yp y I I. r ✓'4;1, a r '• Y,.... t' Y 4 J L 1 k' k.44' ,I ro''� 1" I aq ii 1 . .... i V `",..1.44 v: ,"t +'„ '4� ry 1 x y ''„ ...r t a_ ,X, ✓ t'.y.A'•°„t` ra'"y.Cx ,'�3 -4• I ,c.-4,, 4r"" YS�( '41p�r ,) ,'�'1 4' r 1 ', f°]«/ ,�, ,r « ti I \•t+ rJ✓ !\ r i�bi1 • J �"' ,r,, t,,, + 'I y\,• ,1 !!77 y, y.,'k�.l 1 ,� vA..'+`4 }s«f ..t...11_ '1" 1 T > a y ay Y 1 A y `J I'+4. � p},{ ;_ irr ,.,�, • ,'; ,;• �,'1 �J7 ,, V, '�.•kw :,(1, ; ; t P •w+w' ,-�:..,.. tLM• • C`.,„ rS `I "`•y, '' ,x''r' +, i�,,,, . +t 1} : ' 4x,..:�,, /f i"r i4, +'q'r • ti i • 1 tl I. , "a.,/ 4. w,Aw•m~ . a..,,, , kr,,. •, ,y : 11 I it M i- 3^J i to 1 I i . ,. -, 4 , c.st k / ~ 0.-•,4—•-• 1 ''.- •, _A.„• _ , +7 rJ / W•f.Itl f...�,; i�.,y r•t). • ' y ✓ r, a ..., s a r� A I rY. . k x r H4 'I, r„ I r14.•f�. 1 1 �1 :4 , i' 't ;0, z'j' ;te ..r a 1. l t'” / '4 I T uj ax 4 'x1: ,,y��... y �'� Ili � ,11��0l,��,: r•1 �{;�'�;... ', /.'� .. 1 'fit '� xl ,i f 1•a a,a. \' "{,,,k•--.i., •.. .y «. w.v-i.+,'.'a:,s.«W,�_1.,i' : '. rM-z-„,..r--, -,4--‘- rwt A.,e , ,- «w,+ .....ter ra w, .wa 4 r�.M,•, , ''� �.rrr "'„• .............. ,,.Y Y.J..........1 •• 1. ,, 1•,, way, arl,wl w r ", ..a.:IC F- r ••a.a• ,ax.a`,•.a a. ..»• M 16 2044 1v�1 - 1.aaa a..,_x u.=ti 1, L_............. 4 ,l.•aw r A w.a .m„ap a_• x.a.,wa:w:.,yw., ( 1 P 1 1 • V! { it �'"! dot P" , , . ,f, ,, -.1v . +� �„�., .. .,r,.•.w,x.,waa 444ArfWx.&uWao*q+vA A+ .+,. ' .,.,, <, ,r 'A,1^-t 4'•^"'••ia, ► ,✓„A ..,,C,.. a_,. . .. . . -.0 .,.yr-w..«..-...,._.,...•.+,.........•....�:,,u,•ro,1.rs,• num^.+a«rtrumnuun.ttakt .wwn,.;4.+,: � ■ ,. . • . ; ■ . I ' ., . ,. • " ' ■. . 1 , ... ..-61-,...:,,,.., ,,,,. . • ,.'•*,,,. , , ,, „'•',\Av4f," V. .,N‘',4 ., .,`;,.,. ...ie.;,, . • ,i, ',„4, Q,eir.k .,,, • r t* -r Aft , , , , '/1 * ' '' \— w..., , 4 e 1, . ..,,,,A '4 A , ,,.+40. WA '''' . `, , '. _, , 6 0, tl';19 . '•' . 4•Is.k., *i.A.,lic " ''''''. toe„,.},,v ....,0"..,,,,," .. 40 ,7,,,-*I'''',..*—.*:% ,,', cl k ■:, ,,* . • '.',''ll'e 4;,, \*i 41%.:*** ‘' , , t • , . 'A '''.' 'Z4'',V. ." ° * • i,'t • . ,,;1 ,',•",''I...7.: ...- s . kl, , " ' 41;•'• ; '';A■ ..l ' ,...,6 :' '-':' '',/,I,7 -0' ill ‘,■.' , •• ' •'. ''• 4. fc * '-if\x'' • . - .. , 1 . • '..,i.,), •,,,.:,i,4 ..,. , -4,,,„,v,- „ • ...''' ,,4, .. ' ,ii.,,' 4,1 ,,,e/sti..,' „,...,........,, ..,,, ' , ., .',. 1,, ,,„1.4•',,,,, '. * 0- 1 ' 4,4A , .. /4 4.•k ri-N to,-.„0 . 4..••• \ .,.. „0 , .. ° $ , .\ s 4,,,/•./4.tliqe • . ••"--, ' • ,,,. „,, - a . • - kt,,' 4. ,!.,e ,,,,,,,,,, ff.' 1 '4\'-' fif A it r :7 ..'.."1"''. 'A.," ....',..' ■ .;:b, .1 ','i,-, A 'ts i/•.-e s '', • i; ' 4 . r • .0 _or, . ■ ' `,_ •s, . .,' 4 4 V.t' ,'..;;;I •• .,,w.i ..,..,. ;4'1, '•t!'.., s • ,. ,e*,,• ..' 41-' A it t tc, •••• 4, .•,' '',.„' '..." 44% "',„.t. ••, ''..,t .1.,,..‘`, , • A l‘ '‘l ' ,./4 * * *"4 • „s dein , ''',' ,4•'• , . •, 'N. . lel' •• •'**4.4 •*7.1 '"' ••60/t •, ,,442.\ . . it .4 ',s, '‘..4, .., I,; 4A„ " k, \%*41'.+•1,14 --c.c‘'811e) '•'''''' .4 ‘•., t,' z "17., ,. ',*'s,' ''':', ';'f• ^ t*V 0 t ' '. •444''.„••tt 4 _ • ,, ,/ -.4.,••4, ,,.,,, . *:.,• , 3, 4.,'N': .‘, !,,...,,t' )?;..., ,,i"..,P, .-„,,..... 4 .f ••!'„ ' .' I ,.1 it, '1.:„4,.1., •.,.; ^ ."*.r, ,,;,,,„., ••,,,,:, ,,,;,,‘•5:„... ,,,,,;,,i. , ,,4 ' -"r■ , .,•&-ri',P34,, . r.. t'.* ' ,l'et. ,,;:',,,,,..‘.'..,• 1 . '!,‘,...,H\1. .,.. -1,1,"'"\N i ..,','rt,3 .-74,4.4,,,, '‘',,„P„oilet,..,'%4 ,e-, ; i,td,),,, ,,,..,,,m !!-.^f. • ,.„.4-,;•) k a +, . ' ' % t i • r; , ",,,,,,,,71.:4 i 1 Vt'o, fr,,,,,,,:' ., ,„4,-,,,,..,,.. I r ..'. 4, --.-,L.• , .,li. , ,r IT°.4., 0, *c,),•,,*1 • ..1;10,41/ • ' 4 so': 'k„nr..A.,. ,.1,.•4f.i. , •: ... ,;„ V . ic-y,1- f'.- 4 . /0,. 1 ' ,4'4,41f•'.. ''''', ' dei.,,,t-, "'A li ,,;'t ‘, , ,.a.'„, ',,, ',- • ,, , . ,,, ,r,„ ., .,,A;• '" • . ', `.5" ' \kk. ist,' "," 1 .•.,, (t al i,1,;:4,..,14,7:* ..:•;' 5e.b., 1.,, • ei +1, , ' ?i, ..•;, . ., . 4, V 4 A a‘. •ili l'50.".r. 1 t*.•04( '1.!.4* ' '•• 1: , . `,' '' ••••'-,',. L, 4,,,'' i,'., 1 $t,'• •••f,4.iL '' .* vit i,;.. 1, 'il. q t \ .40.,..t). 0.1,e',, ' It.,t`" •ty, I' .../,.,,.. 4; 4 44.,..)• I ,,, , 412 ,,i111:::{.1,,....„: ..;:,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,i,,:‘,1 ,,,.;.,.,. %... , ,,,-...4.1r-1.1.i... . . , k•,;,',.7, 4, ','..'".; 'sk,, ' I.17 ,,,,,, Al, , 4.,', ,,,„y,i. ,*01 ,i.,7';'4l',+1.4 , '1' ' ,i'l /44'.'•444. ttf.4.• *1''./'' .. '''1,,,,,., 4;4'0''•/1,i,•, ' 44-4;*•''.,„ i i ,•,.4.,.1.!,,44'' ',i ,`, ...41,'.." '1...***A...- -.*. ..).*,' ''tt'-.1- 4,'•"',,I"'47; ,. i." • .'.4,; ..*:',",..k...•;''',''144 .:•1". . ' . . '4•:,14.,:"..„....-4' 4•fr - ' i, ",f' '- • . '4, 4,),,.,,,,i,i(l .1",),•i,;i,T.J.4i• ' ".0•V.:''' P'-'• •"*.i, • ,fr.t ".$, .7.••4- 1.,' , . . ' ...ifp ., •,, 0,-,4. . ii, .", ' ...4•4k,i. ' , .. . • . Iv- ••.4 ) " * 4. 4 • /* l '',/li..1e— '''•'(` ,'1, 04". ' r•4," -,,, • 4•W' r•''., FIL ..r ''.(. 1 — ,. . —... i. :. AO, Ai. 4P1...-- , % .., )boit'' , Y, A ,,, ,,..,..., . ,t. ,,,,,,, ,,,,, , .. ..... ..ei);,..,ii. . ...... . -' . 4i. „,...,,,,.-•,•'44,•4c.F.,--)/i,,.•' , .`A. 'eliv ..,,, `ir:'. I,11.si4 , ,•.. . 11,s' , "i..;"• '.?.. .;1.,-,,..!..,'' ', ' L ,,,,,.„ As 'ci,,),, ,,,i.-- .4,4'1'– '...; k ;,'. elf:24,, .04,, 0;-.'if.„' , ''. ' ''', 0 ... ,,',4 4 ,.pr, ' *, , •„. *!, ,,1,0,,o,'..,47' j . rr 4*ltl.,4' • c i 4 ' * 't ' ••• \ i. °CI' '•;.,'„: 7 '' *C'' , ''s‘") 1: 4,'s'!A`41V**cf• '114,:je,1');•tr,t'' ,., 4,,,, **,''''it.' • / ,r. , ! '4 , I' i i.i '.• t . f, 0. .,,j, , vivi , ,..,, • 6 ,, t, ,,...,,h.,,„...1).,;,,,,,,4",, ,4 ,,,. • ‘‘ ''''-fl.''(4 -''' 4:itt.,;1-.31,471,1IfraltA 14",.•','••:' .i.;, ,st 1: ,', „.. '•,‘"t,,,,, • ',/ I. 4/, ..: 4*,,t, , : . VI ',.., " 't .;..ften : . ., ' v'\• ‘ „,' .,0),' 0, ,,,,,,,4 A. •■.,.,,,, p,. , .4:2 :Ai 4, ct . ‘ k,• • ' % • 1,■, '';`,4"01 , . ., , .,, , - .. .1..14.-:,, . - :f,. .', 1 Irt s '' tt)i. ; ,,s:,-,VIA ' ., • ;‘,, ;;,,, , t ' r 4,4 s •N . ft•••• ' .., , Aii:. ., ,.. . i ''',u ; 4 11..''• ' i')'J \\:' '''./..*:. (1.,',„ - 't: o.....,.,. , ,.. .., ,.: .4 ) 1. • 1:f 701i..1:" (C ,• . '' 'k°1 . \\' ' . .1, ,,,,. ..,,.'" V " ,...., ' ' •••,,,;.:,11i:, 1" . 1 - ' \' ' '144. \l, . ' .." .`, i, l''.'•Ili" '• , '‘..:':.`" "" s, 4, ..,4' .4;\ .. ' , 1,°4 . 1 ""' :■.„,,,, "'t.''' ji.', •.. , • 4,,,,'' ills ,r 47,, -,.4 ,• \. ° ..:■N.,"\0, 4 ',. , ,, .',., ,,,,.n .,'''' . • •1,*,.., . r .' ' , 4. Y".. • '''''.' ' *.1/4 ‘I% \■• :" *, '",, " ' 'V,I.V.. ' 1. • ,0."`;1•1 '''..— • ' / .',al \ A ' -. ,., , • .. •'' - •• ' ' / '',41111V '4' . • ''' • 1.):4' ''' ■ )'''.'-- ' ,,C.' ' ' ,...' 1'011'"„' , .it'* 'S•''''''':melk!..•••• • .• ,,r, s... .., i. - . .::,... , - ., 4 \..t■\\'''.‘. , . .. , . -- Te-i ,, , -.• . .A ,..,... ,t` 0. . . 4, ..' * .• k ' l''' at,,4‘,,f '.'.. ' ''il',.. ",big :'''' ,4- 4,,,..; \i" ,; , i 0 ..,; .,. 1•' i.'4,44" ,4 '," t otr.:• •,;,,...'' .,'.4, \ ,' k'',e''," ,, 0"i ,'„„•. •':‘,..4,,,,.. Iffit ,-..„,, . ,;, • .', ft, tu1,, ',-- , 0* **.i 1' • :/ 'i' 1) • ''s ' '` . 1'''') *4: ' 01., \6 ,.,,tP! isl 4,I\4 k " r e,$, ..,.. t,.,•.. sy k.: ' i .,-,:,.' ,. AA A ‘,... ,...., , k 5, _ , 4.. .••,1 p, N.ti , ,, •■ f 4, . ,,N *. el ..,,'+ , ,- „,. ..," , , .. i '7 4.„, .1'•'42,1... , ,„ . . rt. ,, ,)..',... '0,4:or ,1 ,,,,,li,iotitt‘,,,,0 `e . ', 4, s .„., • ...,,A",,C,,'i ,, ,,,, . .",,,„. •`-''''' ,. .,.. 1...,..•, .. ; • .,,,,."., ' 4 14 L , ''0", ! ., •4, ••••• :, '41"."0+'...■ ulaf te ' ■• ,• ,. 1. • ‘,/' , '"e '''1'i g.'' ''1 4••••1• 4,-'':''• ;, •4) ' ; t' '''''.-•.!'/*:1.','',. 1' t 4x /A 4..::, A"/ .A4 ,.. ..,.;! f.A .., : .,,,; ,. .,,.: . ...., c,,,,, ,.,.. ,,, ..--, ‘ -t.,,4"-* ( .4','', I 4'*':p ' • ,..',..",,* _,....- i. ...'' i 41. , k, , ..,,, , „,..*, ,,,i - , ,,,, -4,.. *.),„' 4„2, •, .41 ).1:, • ,,...,ii,• ” ‘ 4. OA! \ ''' •,.., r! , , JI.s.Le ','14,;.■`:,-.,./. t- , ,,,,C• ,,,, '''' '•'•,•':,• 4 wir i •;•* ••*''', ,44.,,,.' tit,, •%/,',41. % ,V,4•,i, V,.4 142..•*ilifr ,',:4„,./;,* .,,,,4**4 Jr,b;-,4),,„,, '.,,,. ,.;iv-!,. . .,, ,i,,'.:'.T r! 1 441' 'f, tr - '''•!'N ..., '- , ,4 ▪ ,, Tit-s ' 4 W. - . -V .",,r ' il ..... .,,f,e,• 0,,osi.," '4" .1.: r a ; ''' k•47'.,...,,,,'. '• .,,,i. ...- , ,? .• ••.%'''. ,,44.. ,, lo t,„, iti ..,, k Ar44:\ .1,' I t... ‘i,' ., ,,,t.'•"'0',,i:k4:11. . r,,t,i• " ,-:,, ).. «., - .' " ''''. • .. ''' itt,„ :',,..,.,,,- „ ..... , . .. .., .... .;:,„ ,;.t.,, - it . ,,r ,..t .,, ''.'s . klar-1 4, •*" :',/4 ,A ' A s '*.. • • AY,. .-0.4 i,,, . ,,..., A,,,itk ,e' k +;, :44% ... „, ,, .,.. . ,. ..i ,. ,,,\1 e. k4 . ' ,•- ,,,,, ,. .i -.. , ' . .• , . , • ' ." ;,,,,,, -, , ,,t.........-:.).,..,`,I t!• 's...",. t‘ ; . ,, ,,,, ..,.....:,,,,,:: 1,, „:.,.. 4 , 4, . , .., , ,e,- . flii- '`,,',k ‘...44 , .. k. f ." .....'„,). , ,, . ,., ft ..,-, ,. /..,,c,;, ., , 1,, ,, ipir,* . . ,.. ,„,,,-4 •.,„ -,.. , .... 4- .•' ',44P ; ,, '- •,,•,•-• ,,,,, 4;‘,,t,"? ' - •,,,,,,'t .4 . ,,,k; 4, ' ,, --t ',, , ;, ,.,.,• 7- ..„,:i 1,4,*••'••‘, /'''': . 1 • *'' * \/1' •'• 4 ' 1+•••t••, ' '. 4 ;, * "lil*I•4 4+/ ?\ A,▪ ' ... f$, ., .'. 44 ,.`",,i,`‘ . k.. .,..., 0 ,,:,:tii...+, , ) 1.4.''*",..4 . *. ,• " •44, t'st. 1 '1.4 0.44 e le40 , ' , ,, ,.4 iit., ! 111 '"'t't .1.,"' • ,',,..,:, ,, r c V. ii(Str,140,,r,4,..,:‘,Yrt. ,,,, lie 441* *4.• 1 .4 444 *14?•:.).. '...",‘,.‘ l* ' *.1 '•t'44.4 .ti44 ' .. .4)'4 .' * .',''';1•-: '",''-74; • r s-ty,i, . .,:„ 0.,„...,-",,,,,,, .,,,,,„.4,, , - ,4 Ir., '•itt" .t 4 ...... ` . . ,-;,..1•1,,•. /, . ,0„ :LI i , 1),,, tftietk ,..- , 1' ii. .. •fi, ' . .,,, ', , , ,, •,,,, , t, ,,)'',„,0, , ''_Ai ". t: ' •.''',„*: , ,..,„V;', 'I :k .`e, . ' .'lb. , ‘ f 4411'10.1‘" .', ,,0*...,'!".,...,, ,,...,. .. ,, e, 4....'1, % 4;"..,' •',•;,,(".:,4'' ,,l'i`t.:41.`,",.; ,:,,,.- i. t . , uk,lit,;yi.'I,,.;!! ° ‘r•i'•;,.."4"4') '''' - `,ti• I, pt ,.!, .. t !„,,..; , .„ ; *. ., ,AAA, • .. 4.; 1. ,,,,• % ' .,' 1"'i. •12 . ! , - r . st, „4,,) ' ir.,.. r. { I,t ' 't r ' 4, „, 4:' '4 T ,,,e. •,•-. elit, ... r.. .,. — lib "i, , , .... ., 0. .,'4, * 'r , ''', ,:,,,... id**, !•','*•40;:,'., ',I:,•• ,` ". 14' '"' ,$,.;:,,,r A '1' ,■' ,!, 0,4`.,;'.**0 ,bil ','it....k-,d, . i‘ , , ,' .4 o , ' - v .41i% ..,,,,,,.' i., „„,. :v, ,.,,...10,.., , -:.'"/,,,,, . . • ,,,„:„, , ,t'A' ".! '. '.' /. ' i , . ,.:'' 4 tailiV''',S0, ,, ,4,j, , 4.imt , ,,,,,„,,r„,„,..,.1i 1 ., I ; . . ; ;,,,,,ooii.,,' 4010-%,:,;,,.. : ..,. .,„, '0, :', , ..: 4.i':4• 44 toi, ,,,r, ..-,t4, ,.4. , •,f,, - ..,4, t At, ,...• .. :' ..,, . , $3?,••••4'1F-,, .* s ,-14.A 4„,,,i' 4.,....,g, • 4,. „I:, , , ,,,.! 4 . ' , °' A „,,„"'-!;•.',,-t ;"'''''I'i.,`•,.„t".°4:•`,.„,.."..1"-• ' 1..'"'" ,,o.' ,,•°' pi', . .`,,'-'1.* ' , i,.. .' :'. ",' ..)...it.,1 '''f.';•,.,• '• i' -I' ''' ' • ,"„.4. ••• .0' ,'. .. ' '' '',' 1 04' Sr •",t^ k . 01$:.:',. '''''':•!".,,,,I.,, '. ' i.:: ,'*'*i •tk*"4 • it ,i,14'V ' '''" ''- ''''''''' ' ,' '''''''- . .41,-. ",..4, A - ''' ' -- " ‘..7, 'I''' . ' Pk I ei . ... • ... ;' , ,t, ..... -,1/4,,..... ... ,,,i,.....', ,,,, .". .-‘,.0 t'. 0.1 ),,,,A. 4.,ii,/,- ', 1,,,,•• • , , \\ lia, 41c. '44 c, /It . I '....4.,4 '4* '*, 44 4 t•'''.*..,:.* '''''.',/, ' 44;.‘ "' ,,*•t''')41/4 '''* '1 4 '*rAV4i \ iit'i 4 ''' • • *.'4.t..4)4 .'' *** 11. '•••'NX' 4' ' t k.1.,''',''- 4 4^') • •4*):* .9 ,,,, .-. , , , t, f„,, ..,,,, ,:,.,,,,,, .,.. ,,,,• ,,„)., ,.. x ,. ,, 4,!' tsf),:,,,, .,. 10,,...`, ,, o,N. , 1.,, , ,...;,,ic' ' •A...- .i,„Et t,, . lb,14 . „„,a, 1-1F .4, '' 4 4.4`...- - ' , .‘.!.`"1-4' 4 Y ligt• i , „• ''';''..'1' p. '' 4i/)'" . .. 4*.41' lai-,4,' 9,-*`' , t __,„, ,;„__ to 4" ti , ,ti , , . . . „ ,..e,..1,. : •1,. . ,,,, use plan 1 L..., p. 23 L___ J ,.... 4 __ ..„.,,,- .. ,, • ,••I' . .• .. . •, ,. ' . • I • ' . .. • .. . . . , ' 4 . . ,,,.4 ef.e , 6- . , . , -,, . . . , .v....--.0,040:107,17.1.012.1.0...11 C.V.,/ • h•,1741.4‘,4 a r4 4.1,,a co.r 0.,...ocrup- 00.,•cte 1 i . . 1.'44,4•44.^44 , 0 ■hi 4 ' .0 •.•P el••■.. 6,4,4 it..44..,,,,,,/y• • , .4 • t , . 44144.. , . .• it'11, si ... . # * u 4 , . u Z . ., e . , 1/4\ . •• \' , 1 tc!• • 1\ \ • , ,i 1 '". 4"•"4” • •• -...""74• • 1" ,.,..".:7‘...`,.'"•.:-,. a i 1, ,.,4-•'• . „..44'•",,,14-,..,•44 44". • ..,„,„..,44 4 7'444444.4-4■.....,..„,„...,..,..;!!!!/••••4/4.4rit,,,,,,,,,„,.,., • ,,.•.•' •• ./41 .41." ,,,•,..,'••• ',...,„„„L , :::?'"il'f '......'—•'--,-77.-_,,-----„, --••---. . g -•.... ,I ,., -° .,,/,,,,,,2-.° ,, _-,------ - . ,.7*--17-.-. .''' '- ' --:,--:- '.'-+"---- '---7------------...,..7-4.4,::-1,--...• ..,..,,_ i J ,., . . . •,,..1147,,,,-......,...-'' ''.- .1--..•..,;;-:".':7"-'' - ::'-'-'0. 42":'',., .--:-'74.--,-,..'----...„,„ ' I / 4 't* -.*.. ,...),'*--,,-"--,....71. ::-..:...1.'.. —=7' :14,14._*--";•4: -4.••4•-":,'•:.:,.••:"..7'.,' 44 •' ---"'''''',,• 44 1 44 F 11 •, I t ."' '. • ,---"...,•''''... *.••••••••,-.',, '• - ,.=, .,.- We' • ..........--.•-..'"",..--.1-...Z....-Z...--‘ •, 1 'ri / /,.."7:-.,.....-'',...• ,,..., .., . *:::,L,.,.7...:.:,r!~- ...' • ,.•• t k t . . , . .4 4 e . • .• t '!....:. '' „„.441.:,,4.4,' :.;,;:,,..17:•,...7..2.,.:-'--„„=„--::::„,'.1.'.'..:7.7"....::::::.:147L414".1.7,...--„7:::::,,........„_,....--:----,..„,,,,---,.-.. 1:i 1 k k .., . ' \■C\cst:'' '..,••• •.° ' ..-•---' .---..•-•••••.-S.-.....7,•-:-.....„, ,..,..........-*,...„,..,,..r '),1 I 1 -. \ , ...,t.:....5.-. ...•,..,:i„,:i.,,,,••: :::-................. •.,_-"-...L...7...=—"- :,',‘,-" ..**""'...■."7".......... ---"'*••-•,...,„."'' 4 d,/7)4 i . .. '') :I': '' \\'■ , \ \ ....'s. `..., ,,,,.., ,. --'-:::;"4::1•••7'...-*".'''". ..-----"--s"..‹ , ' ,. * N 4 *•• \* •,... ••,\..",`••••''''Z.,'..*:• ....,' ( (''`--'. :::"-'...."''''......,,s'",„...........' 4 1 .,: i. ,-- . /.1 , ",,, , \ \ '1/4. '''s '''`•■•••. .,.. .s•••... `...'",...".....,`..., ''',.......,,..''.,,,,..•••••••,,....."' ,,..„.., I . er ', N, ' ....,,,,,, N,••••,', ....., _••••.,,,N, `,..,:••..,. ,,,,.. 1 • 1,., ,i' \ ,.\\ \ ....,*•••• %.,,,,,.. -,.:::...,,,.......,`,,,,,,,,...4 ,..•,..,,,,,,,,s,,,,,.,.,,, ''''.....,,‘,:.,,,,......,._..e,' L'k 'r N •./ 5/ .. . :44 4 e4/ ,.. \ .„."•••••4„, .."44.,‘,••;44..„ ••,4,...„,,:,....'"444..... 4,,,,,,, /,j.:/1' \ \ \ \\\\, , 4 a.„ 4"••••\ "'N„. *'...,"4„......,!4.,,,,•:::'„Z.z.,,,,, , '4•4•4:",,,••4,, • '., /4 1 414 N, \••‘'••'••• N --\\ ,,,.,.,,,,. ........, .,,,,,,...„ , • ,..... ,,...... ,..... ..,....,..„..................„....,, „ --,„, , ,,„7,........, 4,1° ...,'"".., '' .\\\ 4. ,....,...•••• . t / .., . . , st, 4S .• . 1 i • '''',4,,,, .,..,.. '''''''' •-"") .. , 1 ' i j , ., 4 i , . . . r . . i , .e.7...„.......) I I ,' \ I ....7'..........„. i I (\i, . • s .. it _...._-—---'-1.....,...„...--• .....- ... .. . . . '• • . . • i .--------"7--..:,,,,-- ,m__.,-..------.' ... r 11 1 _ ',1..\1/4\\s, 1 \ ‘ 1 • , Ii , . _ V.■ f ,...-- ..---.----- 1 ) , rt, r ''•,......,.., rj , ...,.., \ ,.....,..e. .,...,--.4.-...,..,.r.,. woe 4: 'it' /'"r44•44 .t...4.••••••s ''' 04••••••''''',,..44.••*".-"4 .../4444m 4.......441" „...4•41•••••• . _,....•••••1 \ * ' i'j •• •itt ''Its, , , •••• * * 4 44-4'•' ••'!:,k-* .,,,.44' ,e4••••••''''" . ,,,,,,, *It..., w ...• . ,. •• * '''14,, a, i , • •, ,(1,,,,,•"'...4 .il'''''''''.,11, ........../..../1":4'..';.-414-"•""T......,......,,,,, „.:..... :::...\-.5.14"/.1:4;*"..--."---:,/,,,:..1:.:i7j.i...........,14::::„..........,411:ii , i.,,,-:1:.)141 . 44 .,... •• 4.4'. ..,„/". ",..k't44,.. . /4" _, •i,' 1'7''‘f•i:*''E.1.- t• .?ti,• - --,..t. i ,• 1 t 1/4\,‘ C r ,^ , , •,. ),. C \ ''., 1 • ...;...."7"'''',.. ■, \..,) ) ) '..1 ( r i, 1 1 ‘ ; I 1 7 • r...." , ,,.... 1 I 1 , 1 4 1 ,' ' / 444.•,,L,•:,4.4••• .2, ,.___ 1 1 44 ..,il ) \ •-.....,,,, „',4•44.4.. 1 - ‘ k 4,.. t % / W I ' \ , , A 1 / t i ,., . .., 41 t .., 'II ,-.„„, .0 1 L I) .:'-,..,ii-. ,,* 'A t li ''.4 e / .1.Z:7'.--7 ,',..._ I., .,,-""'0 It ...,- I, 1, ( [ 4 1 / r" 4•14'' ,. 1: I. 'I li '4. ,k,,,,,d,r......A , I,i -,nip7,kiii , , , ., - 4::;`;',.■•. / . i 1 i:1 i ' ' ''''') ''''''' %'`"----,,.-., °.•t4,, ', C,5,44;0 4 4 tk#''''''t4i rill i 4 4 1 it`i-T-4-:,.14.,,..,1 - ..,:,,,w,`• •■• , ■.'...',..e.•,...It•lia...... ,. , •..... ''' , 4 rtt<44-4., •11 t .".■ .4,....i•j .......,..-,..-4.- • • •i II I ' I . .... _ ... .... existing t.. . ,„ .. , . , . o o a . map .„.„. , . ........ ... ........ ”. ... 1.. •, 4 i .• • 1 • o t..1.•' •-t, ( ,.4... - 4 1.. ii ,•4 . , 1 • I' \ \ 1! • ' '.... '...4 4'- 1' I•• , ...:4.---,' ' '• • tt , 1,,' ,„ ,77,7491 I, ■ •''''•*-". •-•.-''`''.k....., •• . ../ , . .... .... 1 ,f. ot) 1 i ' t'11. \, ■ ' 't I , r. I; . i.. If ,, •, • ,4• • ‘ , A 0 , - t • ., \ • ',., ...., „ ki.Liti''',4 4 ,, el 'VVA 1 \\ ,\ 4.4.. g. ■, / e . e." .., . .., I. A L 4 e•-..'''''-- I,ti t .k , .i:,ak„ '• iir .,.. 4 %iv..........0 k ' . 411. V I C■' 1 .1 i • .q.....,■,..—.t.i..4 a....,.......,.............................•■••.1 1.,.....,••••FA.ALI"......, • . ■.• ... •. ...,•••=4.••••.. ti • ••••■••••••■.4...I••••,■•■.4•••••14.•••I 1. 4*.•■•••■•...•u.*••••...ay..4...••.•••,,, ,z, i I tot; ...,,..-,-., 3.; •.. li let, , t'l i ■ i., .. ) • .4......1•■•. S I. 1 ti'! . . 1 . 1 •, . . ,.....,__r t i$'4' I( ■41‘"11. I . .„ -----.,...,_ . '1' t / •i .LI ■( -.--:',..;.....0,,„— . .....k 1,..-.4. eft ,......., 4,,,,,,I, '-,- A' ..,4_4..0., ' • * "L'....• .0.:.**••.4 '4f* 41 5 s. .1 1 t.i 7.• ...., . • , I . '4,,,,,,„. V."'''''''Z''.•44...4...,,, $o. ! t . / j \\'..1.......*'....t.••.41 ,,,,,..'''''*'''.•4.,. '•• tnralli4IPORMIONti... . 4 ' 1 .. / 1. '''',4....4.7..4. . •••••••••.04•4 4. 4,••.4.41`.•:,;;;;Ct.. ....„4...,,...."7"...**..."--- ',/ ....e... ...01..0...01 i),,k..10,61,..{■,.. ..,•••••WA.1,*H.a 4 •,.., '.... i ,...7.7..................,....,•,,,,,..../.....4.,4..1,4 I#*4•4. . ........0.14 400.4i..,,•0740 0 1.40 14..140.....44 A 7i4'404 444'.0.. ,,,,,,,, - ...,......,..., % .4.7_ 4.I.4,:x.Ara:17,44.11 0.•A..r.4.7.14,+1.4•Mi....a.Lyi§....14.44 41..4.7 14.41.444 44.10,414 Awora I. 4.0..4......., 4 6,4 PA.• .••• 0.16.. Sy• t 4■W...,........4.1.4...,......... ..4. 4. 4,••N.* r ,, y , w„,„,, . .,,,,„,_„,„„.„.„, , .,. .. _ . ,_ ,..., , 11 i k i I i 1 . i I ' 1 LI • ,• h •1 1 ' t4 4 I , * ■ l'.., X 0 jim _., , M1 , ■■ iu map Hii 26 i!, . --- to- „3'0-..,zz ikO�i�GONyN {. / •--*., "'a is U ' L43)4 IlifiLf1T111 w 046 p , . BOX 127 0' TUALATIN, OREGON 97062 ® PHONE 682-2601 5 RUSSELL WASHBURN, CHIEF y P.O., It July 24, 1980 Aldie Howard, Planner City of Tigard City Hall Tigard, Oregon 97223 , Ij Re: Main St. Development, G.I. Joe's Dear Aldie: The preliminary site plan meeting Was held with a re resenw tative of Williams and Gilham, Architects, ill and Gene Birch Sprinkler Specialist, Jim Kenworthy, Plans Reviewer, and my self, Site Plans Reviewer, reg ardin g site plan of the G.I. Joe's Main Street development and other related buildings ilding_ s on the property. The preliminary plarn was submitted with changes that were made to be put on a new plan that will become part of the permanent file when submitted to the City of Tigard Planning Department, The changes that were to be made were: I. Hydrants 1 . A new hydrant] beside Building #4 2. Hydrant northeast corner of G.I. doe's Bldg. #5, 3. Hydrant south center of G.I. Joe's Bldg, #5 II. Traffic Patterns 1 . The east exit near Bldg. #5, G.I. Joe's, the island s h fire to be only paint striping to allow maneuvering � of fire apparatus. �t 2. The e new is only street to a to be built on the north side of the 24' street.. The street is to be posted With a sign "No Parking" and to be a public street so that no parking can be enforced,a , public Asa requirement to eliminate some fire hydrants, the major building, #5, G.I. Joe's and the attached grocery store are required to be automat`c fire spri nkl ered throughout, I spry .a,. ,.r .......... ... ,.wwn,.....-•- M rr+dA.'Iy...L.°..WJ.:-.°.a.r-.,µ,y>. J .. • • • • • If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Yours truly, Flo eph A. Greu1 ich uty Fire Marshal JAG:dm cc: Williams & Gilham 3777 S.E. Milwaukie Portland, Oregon 97202 • • • • 'Q9 1 Y . t tr ef•+.rrw,w .,�.afw�.-.:, ;rs,...�.,,r,,r��r..,.._.«.p..rv,..•...�-. .,.»,: ....,...,,...a: _ _�'••• ,v,•...., .......a.�..�.www..rm.,..�f«�.r...r xtrsvr�wtvraAnmerr7a� a».w ,....w:,.,:,as._..:�.r•;...,.�,,.,.�, , r .� • ( - rE!:i WILLIAMS GILHAM . ARCHITECTS &PLANNERS P.C. • 3777 S.E. MILWAUKIE AVENl1E PORTLAND; OREGON 97202 PH.(503)232-1195 • ,'' MAX P.WILLIAMS,ARCHITECT, A,I,A, LOUIS C, GILHAM',ARCHITECT • July 14, 1980 Mr. Al di e Howard Administrative Assistant • Planning Director City of Tigard 12420 S .W. Main Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE Main Street Development Dear Mr. Howard: In accordance with our conVersatIon of Friday, ` with the July 11 we request a special meeting Planning Commission for August 12 for the purpose of the general review for the above referenced project. Very truly yours, • WILLI MS & GILHAM uis C . Gilham LCG/bas • r ' 4 6. I . ( .4'.14,, • Ze:t.:1 C AGENDA. .5,� �/ ° 1, ` �-.2r)<-2 41 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ,rJ June 3, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. i ...Ltc�, ` j� Fowler Junior High -- Lecture Room /'y1Ulp, " <. 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard e - 1. Open Meetingi 7 ‘ 2. Roll Call: 3, Approval of Minutes from Previous Meeting ,, 4. Planning Commission Communication: 5. Public Hearing: f A. Staff Report ' B. Applicant's Presentation j, `, C. Public Testimony p` 1< • 1. Proponent's 2, Opponent's i. 3. Cross-Eaiation j 5,1 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 6-80 (J. B. Bishop/G.I. Foes) NPO41, R 5.2 ZONE ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT, ZOA 2-80 (City of Tigard) ,` • 6. Old Business , 7: New Business L , ' 8. Other BuSineSS 9. Ad j ourniti nt , ' I '"i• • ; • r • ..�... .,...,r r+nn"atMOwer}'Sred:R&'0.9rTrv�'W.odYfru,ta,t�". �(• ..r it:!.x • , ; Y w PUBLIC NOTICE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSI( . rr June 3, - :1980 730 p.m. Fowler Junior High Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard 5. Public Hearings 5.1 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 6. 80 (J. B. Bishop/ G.I. Joes) NPO #1. A request by J. B. Bishop and H. J. Buchholz of Main Street Development, Ltd. for a Zone Change from C--3M "Main Street Commercial" to C-3MPD 5 "Main Street Commercial Planned Development District" Zone for approximately 11.i 1 acres located on the southern end of Main Street (Wash. Co. ': Tax. Map 281 2AC, Tax Lots 1600, 1500, 2200, 1400, 1300, 1200, and a +� • portion of 200 parcel #3) , 5.2 ZONE ORDINANCE .TENTI AMENDMENT, ZOA 2-80 (City of Tigard) A request by the City of Tigard for a Zone Ordinance Text Amendment for Chapter 18.24 creating zoning regulation for the A-12 (12 dwelling units per gross acre) and A-20 (20 dwelling units per gross acre) and A-40 (40 dwelling units per gross acre) "Multifamily Residential" Zones. For Tigard Times to publish 5/23/80, 5/28/80, and 5/30/80 • i r A ' l . 1. t 1: ss aNM"NT.M .n+.mnxwm.•l ae4 re..x: . 'b,:r,.vxn w.rn••,yM..x r•.._.a✓: ..........e..-••.- n r,»w.... m.+.AaH WF .P y4rA.a]W+3.1 ".MAfitrrd.9F(.+�r " •' .. .-... • +e«.u.., . rv-+.+:st4. MudtliWt'.vP.v.i1v,M1.s '.,. „, .. , •. y' r • • . o t'''''' 11/1.0 ( (14*—) If N ., ,, . it . . SUSSMAN. SHANK,WAPNICK, CAPLAN 1 STI4.ES ATTORNEYS AT LAW GILBERT SUSSMAN WI AMERICAN BANK BUILDING AREA CODE 503 ` JEFZOME B.SHANK TELEPHONE NORh1AN �vAP ANN PORTLAND, OREGON 97205 E27•JIII BARRY P. CAPLAN �� ° WILLIAM N. STILES N�`'"°'• ""�°'' JOHN P. DAVENPORT JEFFREY R. EPERE • RONALD A,SNELLAN JOHN H.dURKHEIMER June 11, 1980 c 4. Mr. Aldie Howard . City of Tigard P. 0. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Howard: `' Re Main Street Development Project I would appreciate very much being alerted, if you have some mailing procedure on a regular basis to do so, of tit,' any future hearings of the Planning,.;c:oMm ss oner of the City Council in regard to the Main Street Development Project. Very truly yours, SUSSMAN, SHANK, WAPNICK, CAPLAN & STILES OCL& Ml 4 • William N. Stiles NNSkm r 1 . • i r . 1 (f.'"1 t, r VW7 4 1.2.1* CI r' Tc4; WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON June 11, 1980 M.r. J. B. Bishop MAINSTREET DEVELOPMENT LTD. 10505 Wd Barbur Blvd., Suite 303 Portland, Oregon 97219 REVERENCW: ZONE CYANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, ZCPD 6-80 LOCATION: Southern end of Main Street Dear.Mr. Bishop: Please be advised that the Tigard Planning Commission at their regular meeting of K1un 3, 1980 approved your request of Preliminary Plan for land use only Prior to being scheduled before the Planning Commission for a General Plan Review, you will address to the satisfaction of Staff, the following issues. 1. Traffic circulation which includes an analysis of Main Street/99W connection to Ash Street and Ash Street to Burnham. The traffic impact of this development on Main Street and on the Main Street/99W connection shall also be included. 2. Control of all land indldded in this development. More specifically, the 0.D.O.T. portion and the lease situation with Western Oregon Marine. .3. Floodplain issues. 4. Indirect Source Permit from DEQ. When Staff is satisfied with your re8ponses to theSe Concerns, you will be placed on a Planning Commission Agenda. A fee will be paid for the rneral Plan Review when you ate scheduled for this Hearing. Yo t dati, oWard P As ing Director AHvMc NOTE: acknowledgement tUst be signed and rettimed to the City of Tigard Planning Department. Failure to xeturn this acknowledgement will result in no flirbher actin on Ehim project with regards to issuance of Balding permits or engineering approval, SIGNATURE DATE 12420 S.W. MAIN P.O. 80X 23397 TIGAR0, OREGON 97223 PH: 639.4171 ' ' i - , rM ■ w ■ AS I A r CAF PUBLICATION - k,,,,,_ .. " » .0 »',t,, ;94.•► Mfr= 4 a -. STATE OF OREGON, 'I� . s , _ C «, ss, `rGglVts �SSb COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, .=,E y N',} 0,06'4'.- nior:High �... �, r e' �r _�' 10 ,t RO'om I ........ .... ............. ..................:. .......... . ; bh1 , , el g tt, F d '1';''.r; Josephehaer " ke e the w de os and say that I am th ublisher ..-.._ Y� il;1�U;1w' ' beirig first duly s orn, depose� y � � '''gyp ���, ���= y ,�D I��� �: y,, �.:� � ��� r,bps �' � of The Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined : A Well', I •C, O (if ''''''-''''l 1, 7 shQ . J it of alt)$trddtDOV published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and X tttr meflt, by ORS 199,010 and 193.020, pub" ' �� a �Carx f�'p state, that the legal notice, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, Was r. „COmxriarcla 71!rOtr.'801:e0.1'ntilPii`.'c?al'Piat'friedte4L:�f��C� �pp.h ` ro r r iI1Gi t ` '1 published in the entire issue of saki.newspaper for .....,...��,:.,. successive and. ti}�atepy.�.,t�j b'�, e f, p� �`'� � cUth�rh ,end oi�Via''id ed,'on the }. consecutive weeks in the following issues ........................................ . ...... ............ ......Co '&eet as il, ...,.... a, 2 3 t 28 8 & 3 0, 19 8 0 0 r6) tlo '� i(i ,.7' b ' ... ,.. . ..,.. » , ,. ...,».. ., .. �..... z 1 2 ei . t�{so G�r�pp Cei a 8. h ;»Sig et ) r .r � r ;'CCi .w , ues( 6i` f r Subscribed soil stvoru t before me this......... PtYl. ............,,»day of.......,.... iii �Or�dinan she Clt' .i 'lg fiit'' i. o � rice` GX� en t ,i J,one 19:13,P .thin for',t e 1� i` ltl#.za n ula ,er 4,- „4/4 ,,,,,,,,,, f gi tililt h . . ,,,,, . ,t thLt-_,„f_44) , ' ,1,t, Notary Public of Oregon .. `del ,j ' , to ., %F"t ,, ily"R , 74,, e, My commission expire; ....., �y pitiEs 168, ,.^-*, , , w i per.: i , l I I r j 7 i, , i tr . . . . • • - - ' • . MINUTES TIGARD PLANNINO COMMISSION June 3, 1980 • 7:30 p.m. Fowler Junior !Ugh School - Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut St, - Tigard, Oregon In the absence of President Tepedinct, Vice President Speaker OPENED the meeting at\7 ::1.5,, ROLL CALL: • Present: Bonn, Funk,Nlielmer, Herron, Kolleas, Smith, Speaker Absent: Popp, Tepedino Staff: Howard The MINUTES of the May 20 mee jug were considered, and on motion of Helmer, seconded by Kolleas, the wire approved as submitted. The only item under COMMUNICATION:\vas a report by Commissioner Kolleas of an anonymous telephone call eth respect to the hearing at this meeting of the J. Bo Bishop/G.I. Joet13\ ter. • The president read the usual not ce of authority for and procedure to be followed in the meeting, and op ned the PUBLIC HEARINGS portion of the meeting. 5.1 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 6-80 • (J. B. Bishop/G.I. Joe's) NPO #1 A reqUeSt by J. B. Bishop and H. J. Buchholz of Main Street Development, Ltd. for a Zone Change from C-3M "Main Street Commercial" to .C..3MPD "Main Street Commercial Planned Development Districto Zone for approximately 11.51 acres located on the southern end of Main Street (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2$1 2AC, Tax Lots 1600, 1500, 2200, 1400, 1300, 1200, and a portion of 200 parcel #3) HoWard read a MeMorandUm from the Planning Staff to the Commission reed:lime-riding approval for land Use only, and listing staff's principal concerns to be worked out prior to the submission of the general plan, review to the Planning Commission. He also read a letter from the • applicant addressing the question raided about land not owned or con- trelled by the developer. According to the letter, if suitable arrange- ments cannot be made With Western Oregon Marine, a phased project would be planned and submitted for approval. A brief APPLICANt18 PRESENTATION WaS given by LeWiS dilham of • Williams and dilham, Architects, 3777 St Milwaukie Ave. , Portland& Re acknowledged the concerns expressed by the cOMMisSiOn at the previous meeting on the subject, and asked the zone .chaftge be approved so the applicant could work with staff in the preparation of a general plan which would find approval of the commission. He explained that all the usee contemplated were permitted uses in the comprehensive 4, 4 4 4 ; '''; MINUTES k.r TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION June 3, 1980 Page 2 ':''• plan for this areae Mr. Gilham suggested a work session With the commission might be mutually helpful prior to subwission by the applicant of the general plan. This was agreeable with the commission, and will be worked out between the applicant and staff. PUBLIC TESTIMONY: Phil Benson, adjoining landowner and developer, statedstrong approval of this project. COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION: Funk MOVED approval of the Zone .Xhange ZCPD 6-80 based on the land uses contemplated by the applicant, and with the several concerns outlined in the staff memo as proper items for discussion and resolution between staff and the applicant. The motion was seconded by Bonn and carried unanimously. 5.2 ZONE ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT, ZOA 2.80 (City of Tigard) A request by the city of Tigard for a Zone Ordinance Text Amendment for Cha ter 18.24 creating zoning regulation for the A-12 (12 dwell, ng units per gross acre) and (20 dwelling units er gross acre) and A-40 (40 'l,ing units per gross acre "Multifamily Residential Commissioners suggest d minor changes, principally 9rding it was felt better expresso the thought intended. Disc z of the open space requirements resu ted in an agreement that the ,mum' square feet of open space Rho id be 4,000 for 10 dwelling n: )s, 5,000 for 20 dwelling units, -id th n in accordance with ,, 1e schedule proposed. In order to elimine "e p ssible controversies as t( what • Constitutes a story, reference to number of stories or a fixed height Was changed to the fixed h fight Only since this is well defined in the UBC. Density Was stated 7 r buildable acre, rather than per gross acre. PUBLIC TESTIMONY was preset to. by Eldon Edtards of Eldon n C Edwards, Planning fonetilt6,ats, Tigard) presented some observa ions . nd questione for consideration. He called attention to the lac Of t tlee to the various sections of • the proposed ordinance, which ;/staff azreod to remedy. He gttoetioned the formula for calculating d=nsity, b=cause streets are already laid out in the areas toned for higher dens iti..ee. It Was agreed the net buildable area should ekclude, only the e.uired public improvements (rather than 20 per cent as stated in th density computation formula). *** , P P y the Tigard l'riangle, stro tgly J�.ui Miller, owner Of ro ert i advocated-the view that market forces could be relied upon to aesttre the beat de elopment of the area. • A. . 4 ( i ,,„ . C 1 . MEMORANDUM , TO: PLANNING COMMISSION 6/3/80 FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR ' SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY ZCPD 6-80, MAIN STREET DEVELOPMENT/G. I. JOES . Following your last meeting with this applicant on April 22, 1980, the Staff , met with Mr. Lou Gilham, Architect of G. I. Joes. We explained our position. Mr. Gilham Suggested that he be allowed to make a presentation before you this evening. He has assured me that the primary intent of this meeting i• will be to establish the land uses; as I indicated to you in my Staff Report , Agenda 5.5 of April 22, 1980, ZCPD 6-80 under Findings of Fact 1., all of the proposed uses are allowed in the C-3M Zone. The second issue which needs to be addressed is what are the conditions under which you will allow this applicant to return before you for the General I Plan Review. ., Mr. Gilham has assured me that he will submit alternate traffic circulation plans and will have CH2M's comments on these various plans. These will 4 be presented to Staff for review so that we may evaluate them in connection with our traffic circulation proposals. '-s Staff is concerned that all of the property included in this proposal is not Under the direct control of the applicant. The 0.D.O.T. parcel is in ',. ( question. The Western Oregon Marine property situation, relative to lease arrangements, has not been resolved to date. These issueS must be addressed . , to the satisfaction of Staff prior to a General Plan ReView. Attention is to be given to reducing the impact of large structures to immediate surrounding areas of residential developments and the proposed Fanno Creek Park and Greenway area. Applicant to relate this proposal moire specifically to the "intent" of the Planned Development Section of the Code. "PD/18.56.010 Purpose. i 1- , Applicant should have an "Indirect Source Permit" issued for this project by the Departinent of Environtental Quality prior to the Planning CommissiorOs General Plan Review. ' You are aware of the fact that council had diredted that a Special Downtown Committee be formed to prioritarize the ooncernb Voiced in a questionnaire which was tabulated by the Chamber of Commerce. We expect that this committee will examine the traffic Situation, parking, librarY, civic Complex, etc. Out of this, we hope to be able to put together a program for the re-deVeloptent of Downtown Tigard, 8.Eaf recommendS that you approve the Preliminary Plan for land uses only. It is further recommended that the applicant not be scheduled for a General — IL..... (k, Plan RevieW Until the following idbueS have been addressed to the SatiSfadLion of gtaffi. -,..„,,....,.....,......... ,,,,,,„„...„.,,,,,,. y • Page 2, ZCPD 6-80 • 1. Traffic circulation which includes an analysis of Main Street/99W connection to Ash Street and Ash Street to Burnham. The traffic impact of this development on Main Street and on the Main Street/99W connection shall also be included. • • 2. Control of all land included in this development. More specifically, the O.D.O.Tr. portion and the lease situation with Western Oregon Marine. 3. Floodplain issues. 4. Indirect Source Permit from DEQ. • s �. s. ard, Planning Director vmr • • .j f1, • ......,,� ..,,. _.. ,r,„i wr rss �n«+G.rnv. y, ,.-.�. , .,. ., ,0, ,.,.H.s..x+ .�.r-•++.r.a..,3. • 'w ff MAINSTREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD. 10505 SW Barbur Blvd. Suite 303 Portland, OR 97005 May 30, 1980 Mr. Aldie Howard Plannini.. Director City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Aldie: } Herm Buchholz and Lou Gilham informed me that as of this date you are concerned about the ownership and control of tax lot 1300. I am certain your current query is due to the fact that you want to be reassurred that all Six (6) tax lots involved in our proposed Mainstreet Development are owned by MAINSTREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD. or individually by parties affiliated with MAINSTREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD. 1200 and 2 ,01 are,owned you , lots 1500, :L20 ' by MAINSTREET DEVELOPMENT) LTD: and are ready for immed- late development per our proposed conforming uses in our planned unit development proposal. Tax lot 1400 is controlled by Mrs. Buchholz and will be deeded to MAINSTREET once we are ready to start development . Tax lot 1600 is under my development control and is an integral part of the MAINSTREET project . The Valenzuela r s attorney has informed me that they will be vacating the premises July 1, 1980 and will terminate their sub-lease agreement with me, whereby they have rented the motel operation from me since • November, As a result I will commence demolition z�Tovember 1979; � late this summer or early fall once we have our final approvals to proceed with phase I of our planned develop- merit. Tax lot 1300 is currently being leased by me to Western Oregon Marine: This tenancy which extends through July 1, 1984 Will terminate by agreement between Lessor and Lessee', will continue on until July, 1984; or will be terminated due to default by the Lessee! We are continuing our negotiations with Western Oregon Marine inorder to reach an agreement which will allow Tote Reid to y i operations at a new location of permanently relocate his o his choosing , He has indicated to Us that he hopes to be moved by September 30, 1980, a 1. .. .nr-w-n..eA"'ry.-n+...rn..w..n..Aw.+......h.m-...r.+.......rm.+-u.err..h.a._......--./.m.1...._.«._........._r.r.rt-w-...r.-.-....1.L-1..-r-x--ru—..-.u..._h-«.._.nl........r+-.m..-....rt.r-...J.n-•..u.r....-rnnnl........r.ra+rr...trvw-x..-is.Nr ..-.....�..-.......+...........w1n.+-rnr-.«..!n..,.....+n_.A.n...a..w-ir...nv.--....-..........,-.+-.+..-...-sr.w...4»... ` Aldie How :fu. • page two These negotiations, which are solely between the parties k involved, have een carried out r,aAccordng? we ly�� planning p rocess with you and your staff. expect a finalization of these negotiations prior to our it$1 general plan approval. In the event both parties are unable 4` to consummate an tai. lot 1300 MAINSTREET 1l, `g tax phase p staff and the planning commission our concepts for its future use and integration into phase I • z . . . . Pei. our proposed. site plan, the land currently owned by i the State of Oregon Highway Commission and incorporated into our design, is subject to our purchase or long-term #, lease as you' ll note by the letter addressed to you from Will Hite, the State' s property right-a-way manager, dated 1" •; April 21, 1980. .oldie, this memo should answer any questions that have arisen in the past weeks regarding the ownership and develop- 1, ment control by MAINSTREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD of the property involved . r . proposal, Should any further inUOlved in our P U D you have an questions, please call me. Sincerely, JB Bishop • JBBct ' A, a z 0 4q -ri •- '--.,r.raw..wxc,+.-w.x.,_a.r:... ,a .....yv.M a..rtaa... ....ry.:. r...,.."'..,..., _.,,:.. ..._..,..,..w,,..-«..,r..,,....,.u+.r.r«a,enr tee a.¢Wix .,.,... ' w .. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING 7: • ... STATE OF OREGON County of 'Washington ) es. City of Tigard ) T, Viola Christensen, being first duly sworn, on oath despose and say: ` That I am Secretary for the Planning Department for the City of Tigard, Oregon . That I 'serV'ed notice of hearing of the Tigard Planning Commission of which the attached is a copy (Marked E h it A) upon each of the following named p s on the ... L day of Med exSC7;1.� 198_ , by mailing to each of them at the address shown on he attached -ice as reto attached, deposited in • lash. (Marked Exhibit B) r said notice h,� ; ,p the United States Mail on the ` [4 day of/2 , 198Q • postage prepaid. { • . ' / 'r .,:-f4 '''''''''' , . YZL,C.IP ct._ ___,c,,,,,_-_______,4L2.2. -40.6')-\,___:) • Subscribed and sworn to before me on the _ day of� 2 , ' 1980 .• r e 1 001004001. •,, � ,0„, ..%.00,4,106",,,, ,,,,,,'` a a ary Public of Oregon ^ s : co:..` " "d‘44.4..,„,":,* , l'I w A � A µ . ___._._._._Z/_._. M C Q n J n ry fi4� tes i o7 / ,., i t� 4 µ a Rp • k � 11 aV t. „ .d Ay q ai 'i1 , . . , , NOT (r.,•(::) 1' 1\11(::) TIGARI) S I (::;IEE F I"'Ll BL li, I--1 1E)1k.'," 111\!(:3 ':1! . . . , +,. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION At /TS 'MEETING ON TUESDAY, June 3, 1980 tl AT 7:30 P.M. IN T'EIE LECTORS ROOM OF FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH' . SCHOOL, 10865 S.W. WALNUT, TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: .. s APPLICANT:. MAIN STREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD. OWNER: J. B. Bishop and 10505 SW Barbur Blvd., Suite 303 H. J. Buchholz , .' Portland, Oregon 97219 , SAME ADDRESS ' • REQUEST: For a Zone Change from C-3M "Main Street Commercial" to C-3MPD "Main Street Commercial Planned Developirent District" Zone for ' approximately 11.51 acres. LOCATION: Southern end of Main. Street (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2AC, Tax Lots 1600, 1500, , 2200, 1400, 1300, 1200 and a portion of 200 parcel #3) ' . • FILE NO.: ZCPD 6-80 NPO #1 �1"J 'n`.:, L� --'"".�... y+,,,, �, ,...,:. i is....-icy_..rte_• „i i ,i. 1. �P'/ , r { t.fro 7..._., ,,,, i .4.• wn �' M a ; I ; 4ttr t.w. PF4PFLC !• W _!, e ,..... +. . 3 •• e i.w. tiaaa. sT. o po FST GAWE �n t'C'94 sW, a p 4L° i ..=:.a �y• ■4I\Sr' 4�- L et swL �// e 4wi! !W C yl q r �I .fi N I1r� 44. A101400.4} rw ~'I .f}. !W, �f' \,. L!W DJIGEC r,N Ul,i DUYALL !F• 4 t jf,t L NN j .i, Q K "I a /1 i e iT F.r /1,,, !r 7 1 tT �'' * ty.. �}.4VI p ,i!! _ L►sN la RI bT.� "�`E LA r�,I 'C` ._.' ', '��0°f�' w 1..� ♦i^ .. '_~_ i 5 •t • ; 1 � ' ; l 4 .11--- �{,...1 n J ®4 ► 1 ,\• i ∎ _j J'r F "cod a dtd w,ip 1 • ,L. 4/ '4GI, at +�. �ti ,I/ • ��P�•, 'iJ r iT s rk tt. v'l,� V rr b , 4 i 102' s jj CAR4Ln !T' 4 �Q 1 J 1 + ^ NAVPi ' �[Sr. 4 ,MN! 44 VSit ',t lt,4.i t .. . {\^. , 1"h 1. • J ♦ kW. W.UWT .�' �lTd // / •VMd � • • hr .r,,,, 0,4 J4* C of a t4 l� 1 ',.• °rp ;d 4 ,a I { J7---](11...1.1. oT i / ►'�'�Y a !i LM. /1 i:0:::„ ,N0 rj�' '...4'q ,i�; ir.+-C! `" I'". —' k— s M `t R , 1 .. IIP1 AMP r ' n SW.. PAWNA4 /* , �y N r 1 ;i /q *is 4 '+` ''Gt.. �•/� CNERfl�'1 j� 3�, !W 40 ..h, T;. py A{ et AUINM'ILN , mow. ?N H YiEMN1iIN , . , o c w. .ii sw-,7 +4, PANIC 4 a -w si it, wa., dAAgbi 5W ,I _ it U.a=d / sT + :1 \m. , ELN05L ♦. iV Yp41♦. 9W..M 7 114 All.Yli - , `!� i MrlwJice �+ LAGd. pKXM N. •' THE PCJBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER te1ItL BE CONDUCTED �jA ""'t'°•E _ t.� d ANY PERS0t1S SAVING THIS MATTER MAY ATTEND AND B OF THE pLA,N`72NG 4O�ittISSZO��1>: i HEARD; DF1ES OP, TESTIMONY MAY BE SUBMITTED IN WAITING TO BE ENTERED INTO THE RECORD OF THE INITIAL MEA..ttNG♦ ' sN OL YOU WISH TO A,bpMAr, A WAIT''MN LETTER ADDRESSED TO THE CITY RECORDER MUST RM RECEIVED PRIOR0 zr TaM SMV/P 5 AFTER THE VALID, . . . *THE :CTxoN Xs NOTICE ATIO 0�` 2"I�E �L'F1'�,NTx..i'S#•t DAY A7,G.L.J DL`GISIO�•1 OP TF� REARING, xk` Fig .. .. TO APPEAL xS NOT FEC,E'7:Vc.D C'12'I'ttlN !rrr1ENTY DP,,.S, 1 OA 'PUPTREa INE'oRMATroN, ptMASE CONTACT THE VLANNINC; DEPAAT.•IEt1T AT 639-4111 . •j. CITY OP TIGARD, 12420 5O Main Tigard, Oregon 9/223 • , f k ' 3 elm rawsCP 1, hCr I II I • k.� 1 ;,,II I p qI p .'•X•• 1 I I /' I �f r/ .r 0'10 j 00B MCI 4Y 8 «..... �.. I. 3,r42 tGrti r qtr"—1—._.... C'` �C'p�,e,°r,. I r. oy 4p I o ; A pi ,1 ■ ' r z c 4 OM r itrzyill I u I x'001 �'� ;tf( / "ay 1 4 „tt� "--7---.' — --... .,..........-......---..... .... ...... , ........... ... .......,•• ■•••.. . ..•■■••■0■•■•••■•••••,.......••••••.. , I...,t , .. . . . .I. . • • e• . . . ..., . 0•0_03', ..a" , I 4 ••4 . , • , q, I .. 0 ( 4 l...c,( , re) CZ••• 71)/ 1 a 0I, ifi (p I I 0. it I II . 0.. . . I .. . I 1. I 1 4I S -:* ,....r,i,e...4illr, . ,, ; •. .4, v• (• • t; , it-- '14t. • r, 4 . • . ,. . ' • ,„ c .., —?- ( .• „, . ,, .• , a C. ' , 4 , . . . , * , . .., •- ., ........,....r.c.alr,r,. .,....,,,r.”.....A.".. . . . , . I. • .." ' )CI 0 0 $-'-'67 0 /idV620 4200 Z...c----4— ZIC---) . —). ..-- i / 7 ,, .1..1\.,till .„' ',i, i'1.;,* '• \ , C -: i ,A1 ti 4A.14-•":34 1 '' 1 i•'- %.40.11 it,,.. iika ' , I ' r-, ' ''k '4. ..• ),.;; 'i. ,1,:)i, . • , •. 1 .1- k t'1•;..'",, ,t..., 4 ,1:•,;.1*..,,Hi,.A.1!.':'. •. . -r---,- .., --? 5-/ / i r 2 - 1 ,? / C3,, 1 7c)C7 . ... . . . .„..1.4..''•, '• '"4*''.'''T' 't''Aa.t.f.:".'•,,?' ,, / - .......4.......„,.....,.......„..... . 5„..,,„...) ......, . ....., . ' --,. .I • - ------ - ,7 oc6 hx- . , . ,. ... . 1 : . .. ......... , ...... ... . .._ . ....... . i .. . ..., 4--- ,_(......,22fz2........, L..... . ...... , , .. . , ... .. .. . .. . . i I I • V" a . . . . . ... , '.; ,61':.* 1 /eV' i ' • • * . .. .. . . 1 . 0 . . ■ . 1 . . . . . !.. .. '. .'1. '.' '' ''''' : • - ''' . C'71 .. ■ r■+. . • .' 0. ..... , ' e . . , q-ilt-0/41 '/,2 5'L/ 5 c .... . . . N ..«.•'-'4--' I in, /., .•,, , ' ,,,i . ,........ . 1 , . . ,t, •;: ''''fif ‘1 /4, ii,ud c77,2(--1( (... .e.,........ - _ 4,owl,.. ore ; . 6., • r -,•,,,, . . , k.z.f...„,e' I ..„....... .... . ., . e......, .., (0,1/1 ii. - • , '' 1 I., •,;,i/Pp . •'.., ,t Ay, ,4.-.:. ;;;; . . :. to ,; ,_—..i. .,,4.„ gc. # 4 '.te,t, - . ik , ... C.) . C"/".) „,„.......-- @h Ji/C t'le,,') Ac,M,k26.ef,..s . ,,P--c'el/ / . /CC 4, 4- . ,...) ,.,., •, ..,,,,, .,..00..•0/00,..... C0 ,..b Cr.-e'en.”7 CD '' •••a4a0,041/01110Liclx0.0•■•■••••.0,,,,, / ,Ce.,I . ).6 . ,..,,c,z..i.L..,.7. ,„„), ...._,—........— i. ' 1 .,.,, Ci 2/O ea(A../ i)ie,4,(../4 ' ...., •2.ch,S,A..).e.),-0..el . . . . , .. . ., . '1. '.,:. ... ., ., r (it , , , , . . . . .. ,, ...., . . .... \ , . , .., 1,- il- I t e k i ' ,,.., if t t (f. ( 4 ( ( ( : ( . . . (. ,• -Q., ( (... ,...........----‘,..„. . . . . , 1 *4.1,,3/4k;t1.:4, 1 — f." 'It•-•11;. 7 /4 C-- -2 c2.1-2.-ecl) 1 , . .7 14 ... i eO Cj /QaLV212 620 ,.), - .—- 1'i,i'l:4,,41.'",41"e,t,..7. . . • •t i 1 l.) 3-5— C) NZe41 _ a ,__C,0, .1Of) , .. . i . . . . .. • ....z.„.„21.4g,ka.....,,,...., . . . .A - ,- . J(..-) ,S"co isze'.7-)-72,i-c24.., ,i I oo./..2)eeireccc2.. .. . , .. - . _ _ ., . 0)..82.. ..0,oic4? q2cyz.? ..,. .... . IVO .410" . , , . . , It., •41■• . . 4 • . I • 4 0 i • L25 7/ 5 't.,) fit/at1 . ' 0 • , • . , 1 i,2.5--66 S&L) /47'26-a.,&/)-z. , 11oiaLeeay . A • 12.7scics „Le, gs- sc„) /764,60Rdi :._ ‘,/ ,7 • , l' ,,,,, 0 0 ,, ...p gLoa.amco) '.1' 6)0,,S-- c 4 . •. , . 67os v i c , ) 70/ (Pa Lzed7t. -4,-''' . / . ...,.. „,7 hz . 0 , 1 0 sct) ,(7 aCt. 4,t, ,/. _ .1? 2 __3.1 a j....,./6052-1 ''?0 '4 • ..., . . . . . , ... . • . (--- 170 i -- -kAlt. 0,0 I /03 /c2C, • ' -11- 7 2 52 lc=R 17.-2O ‘ • i, -,A., ',e,,,.; : ‘.° 19*/ . ''':' I 1':1`;'1':i.'‘kti 1?, • ) 1 ' ' , ......,,--'■-• i 4/1 z'ept./4*;/(_.„, 4 i , ;gki 17(:44' ;:okt. gear' t. . . ?97'/ 2.801,et P a, )36) 5" s „/ilq,. A 411,4 ....,„...„......: -6 • ' .. s p....... ' 4 / 0956 56u5 ed.2,75- 1 : . , , s., e r 1 I i 4 frl„J``J, •C. /4...45.r"""` j, 1 . /(... , 0 /4. II 4 /•tow . , . ..,., .. ,•„ „. . . . . . . 7.• . ,I 1 .• ,' ....i\ ': •4.... ., , 0 , 4 4, . i,v . . !.. , ,. 4 • ., '4' C, kL ) . • ' . . • • . •ot,:,. ., ' . ,I il• ,6, 4 ."%, , ki, ( t. it ( k ' 4. ' 4:. '4- 4, k. ( (. k. k , ,,,, ...., .... _., _.... J... _, •„,,, . . , ...... 1 1 " , . ., ( '...t. l • • ., . .A --) , .4• , • 4'.)Cf. D 6 —E P .,3 :-. , , ..1-1:, ,. , 1., l'il• °Dr"',.. .,';'-;■.;i:j..k ' i i 4 j 4,1 ‘, it,,,:. ; •, . .......„ ,f .......-....„,k . ./....... '', '') '"? A- A ,,;i.,1',i,.4.,(•,....4,,,,,,,,,,, -.) , ,,,,i, ,,,, 4`7,7t/. ,...) 4,. 4,,e,/dfr.,J16c P1°,14-I X):}.2,-jCii:,,' 7y2.0. . ......;•., ,. ;,t..4 1,i,..tf '.:',°•-.4,4 t. '.‘ • ,,,O, . fa) i 7.- J , , . ,. 00.7,4; 461,., ..a.,..R....A. 7i..:?.../4. , ! 105414:,r, 54.() R---,.. ...._ .._ Ikz4..ty.... , • .i,,, ,...,. 4,4 1-1 ,, 02.,. • , ,,,, _ , ,.., • 1....+446.64.;,,,2......-........ • , tf-e9 972d / i --) .---- . •,, : . ,.,.. 1,,,,, C'Z„•e.„4_,y2.0_,01,--T , -1 0/ ---- c.../9)1....,e 0,,-.3 ..... , . . ,. . . .......... • , ..,..._._--.-------- •.,.,.,. ,.,. • , .• 9 ' 1 ,4,0--, , 1 . :, . .,., ..a.'".:''' • . :-....1 e7-0 6.) 6.'Z. -e..,4---. •. , .,...„._ - , .... , . . , .. r:-..,_ , L., 6 '• A , . . I . O'f.21,.. ........2... ....,..,,, C _ • , . • 1 ii&O 0.■54) ezil..4„ . . • • • . .• c-- .../ 9 f-,2„) st ) 90..L._) 4-- ... . .... ,„, . 4 ,-. . • ,, • , , . _.... . • 1 ja '.3 ..S"ck.) Pe:Lc_ 4/W-4(y- , c• . : . L... • .• ot, , /.. •O So......->litx cc...0 ,..5'.. 0 d „, . . 1 . . . , , ... , 'ff - I i /I A • , „,, . . . \t. . --z,Lie .., , 520,.47,..5, .. to - .. ., . i. . ii#: i ,e3./.3---e.'.)(,/. ,.,e6/' 77_ 12_, ,. ii ,,,, -74 0 c„...„4_. ../...--.)c-z_.4,,t„, . i ,....)--c,, , 4111 :- '44t %( .:. .. i ....t, .„.„ • ! . .''''il',11 11';11.1.::::::,,'•:.4iE3,...''..14,i'?:'.',Iii.',1,:',(::,,r',,,'.411*'''',:,:..4'.;'1\i.-','......,.' I 93/ sco euc,a4g&e,,,r--- , • +. 4 .........,.1::::f.1 ..,,, ''''' )1 CP ' C*....., i . I+ 4 • '2,.4 t,:, , iiipp' '1, ,,,,:•••••,..• .1 . A i ',,i' ty-.4.4 Alti, ..4 4 ../.444(1, Pi•-0,,,.- ' , . . 2.. 5 / , 2 ,,,,- c ) ' i C'::;(7.)..: . , . . • .,...., ,.:„....,. i 4 , i.g. V -.: ■ 'At'l" • 6-"C.t•A,.1.4_,-/_,. 2.E' . .. - • • ,„ ) ..,• ....... ' ...*,.'' .10RW-114044■61.6 ,, ) .;) . 9 '1 t'e-t. i e•-7Z1...L /a/A-44 i•, .- ,....,, ...., ,, . , .: i .. t .. .... , - ,.. , • . . . •.„ : ' , ' I 1 ■ '!I, ' ` ` ^ . ^ . ' • • j. ,,.....,,T,e/yte' 44#7674,,,,C' ( '710 _.7,0-4,1je...„,..447,4,i ,. ,ti.e.e.„,Wz4-/•' t..e.„. .,e4i Kg , .. ' , ivtgiat4SWAstaint" el$01002Efigt& ' .4-7 .—..„..„,„:„,),....,,, ....u...4_, L ,,.,:y/ ,L.,...1 1 , ... ...„,,,...L.,„...,.„,... , „.....„ — ____ _____ q . , • i ....., au , 1": _Li....4 r--1-"1 Enj • - • ___,77, owl is r 1 1 J., A 1,..act-- , A F /E7-aa:i Ira"1171', 4_ mei.[1:r7Ti_r_i r.... . .1 .j:r_ir , r''' \ \ \\ =c---- 1E- r-i"=""i al a El=, , _ , \\____:.,,,. i , , L.:, .. —3 L ,.....ir.-4_,, c„47--i ,.1 Jul'. - „ ..• 1 \_,...---'' , \ -...,==-..T.-i .7.7-",,,r,,,, priru...Li..,HFRF 1 hr,7-r--,[7-1T......@ :Tr] u.,,,--■ -.' t.) [......j /...111 i ••• , .■ ----- t(-Eitiorri▪ ion-FT F. 4 L. ..,4-, --11 j ' ' 1 #, '''. is ili 4-1-t. , \\'' \ILs\\\•, ‘ _,, , ad 1 tar}....011-1--L--i, 1--t:i—H.- plEra 1.- i=i-r-r-=r---Trr-Lltm'l 711771. r u, \.,,\‘ ''F,„,. \ cN.7.3 ',, "-,,,, w t ;iik___El '' ' nal t 141 , , , 1 :: 21 MEE 1 ", ,r--- i tt. 1 - , „..,... ,... ,, -., ... ...... , - se , I-- WI, 746 lot-_ .. -Emig.6J ii. ,RP:frummis ET 10.4 ow ,. , 1/ I \ ‘...... .am . ''. ' 111 L 1, HI , „ , , r ir....)...-7))\72,1 4 11111114._.er,A III h ,,,,di -a t 4.,,, , . , ...„- Ir.,. , . ,, , . :._. , . 1.-1-1--,---2;0 • 1\--) .., *.‘411 li 1 • Scrou..,:,71 :2'.... s.L, ,,, \''‘4, i... * . 1 $ 1 ' ' ...21___V'Z 'S* - a: ' 4111:ego.,,,i''..1E C •• r' ' ,---'-'r-ti'.* ' mama 721 1, Alit Nri„ \ ' r___,. ii, ,,,,,, , : .....,.. bp,. 4,,, • fl- L,.\\ gori..s., 1 rah, , \: .. ,..., ,,,,,,,,,.,, \\ .. ..,..„,..,.....„- : '1.--,-- ------' , . ... ,„,,,, ii._ til -.1- ''........„„ 47/Rogor.,114, %- ila.g. 1 i 41 , " ....,&4,sf 4-, .-.0. -..' \i"...4111 4\7.-\ • — i,' i ..., 11.*4. ---,*„..<741, 44.A.,, - i om • , . 7.11,iiir#4 ' 1,4„......;-..,4, t ,/,/,--...-----„,/,„ 0% /sy, x' ,,.. Ilk\ \ ' , .1 P ink IF ° ."\ ' - '',. ‘1 4/ / ./ ;,, , 7,.i.... weemai Ai r -.0 ...if It, ar / 4", 2,› ...„. -.,-).,7:/‹./..s Ii9 ill I If )\ \. ' , .4 .1 TIM 1, i„st ,,,... , .,; s., , ,,,,. •Al.....-4p,,,, , c\\,,,,x, , ,,,,:__.\\\,,, , ,---- ....,.. „,, .... ...ft.A.... ,,,,,, ,,-,,,x,_ ap f„ ,s. i, ,, ..,, ...,.., a ..,,,,, .• .;• , Nr. 44I■ /4". 4,1/ ' 1 ,A,.' 4 , \ ‘4,_ • s, • •IL', ,7411#' , r' ■</.' \\/ al , \-L.'t so.''''i : . _ ,, 4 < 1104 e'0 k' itrITV / ' o ..........F. .mi-NW ,. Alk /s. N'S.,,,i,MP/ 4. I -1,14.., ,4 \ , 1 F-jj;":, . :Iv Nina -ir-T.z1-:Q 1 7 10.-.0,. . v... : - . 1 , -, 1 1 ....,• .. it r - u 4,... , ; ' 0, • 11%, ,..,, ...... \ ■„, /h•-•up, ' ' II li ILI Sir. , sl; !k* v.A:ta 11:67 ,, 17‘‘ ,,,,,,,, 1 _„„...„..,cs,,.._ 0 ,• 6 \ ... .. ' t..--ri;i4,1,L,Li ,,1. , ' jL ' ' a . .. ,Ye8 /' , ' 1 ,-..---$., 01; — 4-- 4 --*-4-j\ "S'**** . ,. ,,,,t 4- 4* r ' . ^-,,/ I , __ ,. , i , , h Et\ -...L.,., . -r 5 ' - 1 )1 t' I .- —, 4 1 N ! 1 1 14 H *.-'--_~i_.--A '''' ,#): t'*.■,,,..ii ' 1''.77,, 4:'.4,/ '''.',*,..*'‘ T.. E, -.. I ..L... - 1 ,,H I 1 I I : r---- .-:.. 3 E i i : . , , ,,,, ,..,_,-, , N„ C-- , „„.L- '-"r- II \ - '' 4911 1 : 'VI / N`414‘Z, ' In tc."-.- 11111 _ ' jr0 g .*-- '' 0 .,. ,i,, 1 1 11112-1 illint- --! ,11110_ 7" " ' GI" . 11.A.,--LLI,j.r' 1-------Tt • ---i, "'-'. - ' ,,'''' i — rls:'''' . . -- "r": 1.1 1. Hmill+"- 2:"."-:';'"----i' - ' '.- -9.4, Ca': ,r, .0.2 ' ''''''."""'r— -=.71'7 ini 0M," 1 lir r- - ,....._ 4.... 1 '*.1 ill'oliti 4 11M ' NW -/"'''' -4.t* . / I t , 1 r..,_,,r , i ,....i_r,. i 1, alba ., ,„..1 1 , t.---- ' .„.,,.....„._ 1 ) 1:1 ra:, LLH1 *-4i:-..1-1 1 . . • • . . , . 4 0\q,,4-• CITY OF TIGARD • • . tRO;•• . A ,I , 12420 SW MAIN ' • , • o 1 - - t , P•O, BOX 23397 , 11„SENDER '',' j tiuy `Id ' ' ' ',`,... ,','t4 1, • , TIGARD, OR, 97223 . • OCCOPAN7' 12940 N Main Ti,ga.rd I OR 97223 ,. . . , NO StICI-111,US•ABLA S , . • . 4 ,. . , . • •. . • • •. • •. Ps? 411C " CITY OF'1GARO 12420 SW MAIN T:„ P.0, BOX 23397 LL1 0 1A1 1,9 PO 6 LV TIOARD,OR, 97223 • IlEti8ow 6fr,i/Lef6...,y,/otti lo550 8t4 Sth if275 riedvettrih., OR 97oos A/1,, F/S/4/ • *-1 A i • ;1 rI '''•••I • • CITY OF TIGARD t; ��. r. ,�. 12420 S.W. MAIN , ay RO, BOX y7 v,30,.. ��... ./ it TIGARD OR 97223 ,. pairruu414 aL1CM Nllfhu'F MILLAt 0/0 t'AWb • 3204 5 f 1Oth„f Avd Portland, tl 9/212 .. . . , , • , .. . •. ..• ;,. i.,.. , . f k • I, , • . '. • .. ,. :• B LANDIS, AI & AILtY •• . LAWYERS 1516 GEORGIA.PACIFIC BUILDING . . PORTLAND, OREGON 97204. TEL6PHONE(503)224=6532 . • DAVID C.LANDIS FRE° M.AEBI , , JOE D.BAILEY .. • JOHN C.MERCER May 21, 1980 JAMES M.CALLAHAN .,. . • ANNA M.MOFRAN :' . H.ELIZABETH GOEBEL - , . . . . . . . . . i . . . , Planning Commission . . . :,:.,... City of Tigard P. O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 , . Gentlemen: • ., • . • .. ..,, I enclose a memorandum I have prepared in response to questions 1 was asked to look at in connection with the . . t G.I. Joe's preliminary plan. . '.. - .. . . .. ..4 The applicant wanted to. appeal the preliminary plan • denial, arid when this. has happened in the past we have not known how to go about dealing with the problem except to , . . on encourage the City Council to remand to the Planning Cottissl , .. .. whether it agrees or disagrees with the attitude expressed by the Planning Commission. With that in mind, I thought we might • avoid confusion and some of the loss of time if we merely returned the preliminary plan to the Planning Coillti88i0h agenda. . . . After reviewing the file and talking with. Mr. Janik, who repre- sents the developers, 1 was concerned that we tight not be on strong legal ground in denying the preliminary plan. For that with . reason, in coriection Wlth the return to your agenda of the which • .. , . prelimlnry plan 1 have prepared a memorandum WAlcn I OndloSe. . .J Very truly yours, ,..,.V.:. . . ,,, . ,..,,,, , • . . • ' Joe Di taile. ..).,1 . :.... ,.. JDE(/mr .., tncloSure '. . ..:, .'" -A , • , . . . . , f . . . • ...,.....„. .. ... ,. ..,..., ..,,...,........,..,...,,,.,.....,...„.,....„„.,.,„...„...„,.,.,„,_...,........,.,....,...„.._...„..,,,,_,.....,..„......„..,,,.........,...„`,-,.,.,•,1..,.r.,,...\,.L..,,,,,,,,,,. .1r ,/1.■I,,,, ,,/, . ,r,,,,,■. .I, , ,, , . ,,. ■.,', ,,. '.,,,,,,\,,,■1...I“■ \,,,,/,.„.., ,., MEMORANDUM TO: Tigard Planning Commission FROM: City Attorney RE: ZCPD6-80 Main St. Development, Ltd. (Bishop/Buchholz) As a result of the Planning Commission action of April 22 the applicant has filed a notice of appeal with the City. You may remember that we have previously had some diffi- culty in dealing with attempts to appeal from denials of pre- . liminary approvals in planned development proceedings. For that ,• 4 reason I was asked to consider the notice of appeal, the pro- ceedings of April 22, and the relevant ordinances, and to advise the planning staff, the City Council and the Planning Commission with respect to the problems that have been presented. My conclusion is that the application should be remanded to the Planning Commission. Here is my reaSoning: 1. The basis for the denial, as recited in the Planning Director's April 29 letter to the applicant, was that .1-.he Planning Commiosion felt the application contained an inadequate design of access to HighWay 99 and the tie-in to Main Street, and an settled floodplain-greenbelt question. 11 2. Sedtion 18,56.020 describes the standards and proce- .k dures for the Planning Commission's review of preliminary development plans. 1 have attached copies of this SeOtin to this memo. or this discussion 1 am focusing on subsections (b) and (c) . Subsection (b) desdribes the planning Commission's role at this stage aS follows ° Y „ "The planning commission shall informally review the preliminary development plan and program and may act to grant preliminary approval, approval with recommended modifications or denial. Such action shall be based upon the comprehensive plan, the standards of this title and other regu- -..' .1,.ations and the suitability of the proposed development in relation to the character of the area. " think some ambiguity is created by the phrases "the standards of this title and other regulations, " but I think the section is still relatively clear. It seems to me it is saying that at this stage the Planning CommissiOn should consider (a) whether the pre- !- liminary plan is consistent with the comprehensive plan and (b) whether the proposed development is suitable, given the character of the area. Barring some significant anomaly in the comprehen- sive plan these two criteria ought to be redundant. That is, if the comprehensive plan makes good sense then if the proposal coin- plies with the comprehensive plan it ought also to be suitable for the area. With regard to the language about "the standards ; of this title and other regulations I see the Planning Commission's role as being limited to the identification of inconSistencieS between the proposal and Specific standards or regulations. This reading of subsection (b) seems to me to give a very limited role to the preliminary plan reviev. I see the question subsection (b) puts to the Planning CommiSSion to be "Is the proposed land use generally suitable for the land under the comprehensive plan?" 3 The mechanism Made available by' 18.56.020 fOr the Planning COmMi8siOn18 Conveying to the applicant its re5erVation8 and concerns is its Power to make recommendations for modJfying the preliMinarY plan and to make sUggestions for the general plan. 2 ■ Subsection (c) carefully protects the Planning Commission from being regarded as having given specific approval to precise locations of uses and so forth in the general plan stage. That is, subsections (b) and (c) make it clear that it is the general plan stage, and not the preliminary plan stage, at which the commission and then the City Council must rule on the concrete details of the plan. Section 18.b6 .030 provides exhaustive detail as to the subjects to be considered in connection with the general plan and the standards to be applied. All of the concern referred to in the Planning Commission's April 22 action are specifically iden- „0 tified in 18 .56.030 as subjects to be encountered at that stage. I am aware that there are good reasons for considering every important element of the plan as early as possible. think of the connections between the proposed development and external traffic pattorns as being among the most important ele ments of a plan. I know that delaying consideration of such things as traffic patterns until the time a general plan is pre- sented can result in significant expense to the developer and substantial loss of time to both the developer and the city. It is always easier to change those things early in the game. my reading of out ordinance, however, says that kind of decision- making must be postponed until the general plan stage. These issues can be considered only as they relate to the standards for prelilainary plan review, set forth below, The Planning Commission can, of course, recommend modifications in its response to the pre- liminary plan presented to it, and in that way save at least some of the time that would otherwise be lost. 3 ra • • Y is • e y c w I w I To summarize, the only legally sufficient bases ses for 'I'•, the denial of a preliminary plan are (1) the incompatibility of the proposed use and the comprehensive plan; (2) unsuitability of the proposed use given the surrounding area; (3) conflict between the proposed use and a particular section of the zoning code or a particular relevant regulation. Since it was clear to me that I would have to recommend >r ;• r to the City Council that this matter be remanded to t he Planning Commission, and since no matter what the result in the City Council the issue would be returned to the Planning Commission in one way or another, I decided that the most efficient method of processing this application from this point was to return it to the Planning Commission agenda for reconsideration in light of the provisions sf of Section 18.56.020. Because the code treats the Planning Commission's review of a preliminary plan as an "informal" pro- ceeding z have anticipated that questions of the scope of the discussion when the matter is again on your agenda will not be troublesome. New testimony cannot be taken without reopening the ,I y � hearing, but the commission may well feel that it does not need further testimony. f . f'? di 1 1 1 . 1 TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON (oh TRINET 4012 SE 17th AVENUE PORTLAND,OREGON 97202 May 20, 1980 Mr. Aldie Howard Planning Director 12420 S.W. Main Street P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 tear M . Howard: On May 16 M . J. B. Bishop met with Tri-Met staff to discuss coordination of the planned G.1. Joe s commercial development at Main Street and Pacific Highway with Tri-Met bus service at that location. Mr. Ken Stanley represented the Service Planning staff and Mr. Ron Higbee of Engineering Services also reviewed the plans. As you know, the development includes reconstruction of the controlled intersection at Main Street. Based on current Tri-Met policy relating to developments of this type, Tri- ' 6 Met will not operate transit service into the interior of the development due to bus schedule delay from parking activity and turning movements. There is a need, however, to serve the site from the street in a manner that will not obstruct traffic, yet will allow direct convenient access for the transit • patron. Tri-Met has identified four changes or concerns which should be addressed subject to review of the Oregon Department of Transportation and the City of Tigard: 1. A bus stop should be accommodated on Pacific Highway on the northbound side n. of t road immediately beyond the signalized entrance to the planned development. This would require the elimination of the curb extension between the right hand turning lane and the entrance. This area would bcome.a bus stop zone extending eighty (89' ) feet minimum from the entrance curb line to accommodate up to a sixty (60' ) foot articulated transit bus, plus twenty (20' ) feet to the curb. This area should be marked as a bus zone to reduce confusion with the turn lane onto Main Street. buses using this stop would most likely turn onto Main Street, but would also be able to merge into the through lane to continue on Pacific Highway. A pedestrian crossing at the entrance intersection or at Main Street across Pacific Highway should be provided as shown to allow southbound bus patrons to access the development. Mr. Al di e Howard May 20, 1980 Page Two 2. bus stop shelter of standard design with concrete pad should be provided bythedeveloper within the bus stop area in front of the proposed restaurant. The shelter must he located as close as possible to the front of the bus stop zone. (Approximately 80 to 100 feet from the curb line of the development entrance. ) 3 Direct edestr+an access should be provided from the bus stop to the pro- posed O.I.Joe s/Waremart areas to the rear of the site The present plan would require pedestrian movement amidst parking traffic. This walkway would logically be an extension of the walk on the north side of the restau- rant. The parking islands could be shifted and adjusted to accommodate a Total walking distances should not exceed five hundred (500' ) feet • walkway. • The distance to G.I. Joe's would be about four hundred eighty (480 ) feet. 4e The bus stop now on Main Street near the existing library should be retained. While somewhat distant from the main portions of the planned development, ; it is the only stop in the area available to buses crossing Pacific Highway onto Main Street from Johnson Street. copy of applicable Tri -Met design standards for stops and Attached is a py pp g shelters. Tri-Met feels that the design changes and the provision of shelter and walkways is a reasonable request given the size of the planned development. An increasing number of persons are using transit for shopping, personal business and recreation, and we feel that the requested provisions are appropriate. • Please contact Ken Stanley at 238-4994 or myself at 238-49/9 if you have any questions or comments regarding these concerns. Sincerely; Senior Transportation,tar Philp R. Selin Planner P RS rm Attachments Sob limezger, OuOT cc Fa Ron Fa Allen, CH2M/Hill J, B. Iii shop, Developer Bob Post, Tri-let Ron Higbee, Tri-Met Ken Stanley, Tri-Met Paul H. Bay, Tri-Met .. • . ..• 44._-1 l' I To,, , , , , „,-,,,--- - ' „ 1_ y"""am / 5 ; i4,.4.,,",....ar --',...,;44k.,..-.74..7.6‘,.. „� _ 1• • ( 1 .." i . .t , --/ 1 I I I I I ti AI), , r.., s k I I j , NIL , a ,,i i r 1 , , . — 1 Q I I h a 1 )11■ �� 1 :: 1 1 140 --, I I I ,'k• IA 1 , ..� , . _._ .. I •• 1 ii ■. , 1 1 1 r t I `(j " ' :A.„, • t1 t , , 1 � r „ ,....1 ' . 1 I ,.„,"'"'”' ei, I i ..t, .4 le 1 •■■•.4.,• I `t.4 tF .I I t iot.:1 . I I' _.a. �, IA ��) ///��l'''///''''''��] 1 1 • . ` C ,.J. x I 1 F r. I i 1 I ., ---- , v t i,,,,,...,..:L.., ..; ,,, J-t ` t jl V 1 . 11 y. , I i I I c I. .iff iiitv I ; 1 . V i ' { V .,A. J..urLw_.��•,.�Jx....i+.w.. .,.......... .44 n.�1.4 M+L.4........4 or J.r{.-....,. M 4aM,.,.i..W. it%wi ,i. ,,......,.,, �r✓'�~ 1 1 1. t y A �. ` ��, I W ELL 1't,"ye, 11F4411 a s' 1 ' ,, ' Y o k , + ' r }a ..JY.v.a.l.+..r..a,r• „•.' .w..,a-JL„ ■ rruM,a.*........t...,............, a•.w a•._.+iralr...... {' ,, { 1 1 i •, +, t y Y a7 .,i. . ..•.. � a. + r a...{. . ` _.a..l.a.y a a y. . - ; , , , a i u »« r, 111 I ' ,-- ,. . tew ... �, .w..,.....::. ....,... +...: -7-44,., --,,� u• ' •+u. • .r -.d nJ 4' 1 ' Iii 1.....1 w w r 1 • .au F . 1 Y It 11. t A.......—.....—.. .. "rill.mt-r. 4sEco,64m,r tq btt) ob Ia1 col b 1 I \1 • '� { . - 41 . 'r f.. AO'' - _ /r••-•1\r\� { t• i M ( I o1.'' .' +ji a , ' 1K t. j N\ A F P " .".11 t " .� r1. r,r+ia .` ti} . \tin. ,r'.,....,7! a ` \ ��• �in ' , , \, ` � / l f ''� ti i, ‘4, s w 00 ;',0,h.,'1—,it,. \ i'f s \ ‘' \ % \!.;: '...\ \ \ ''',4.......'.......L. „,1 Zt. :a, "''+ j ,4 c y, y `tom \` ,. • I�`t d�, !�N.K � '``+ Y '� 11� .,1.1 .+\ .} 9, :..:Y•1. ..; M�. ,.i� �fy 2.. 'f ! - ` .ci.1 1. `\ 1 ``t, \, 1 1. \- ' �•{.' •r Y Y �J STS it'''' `r-1 4" \ , ..',A , , . \ .' \ 1 d . t..;\ I . r ,. ,,,L:4 1> . \ \ \ . t v );( ' 1* '4'.'■,;"t.'„' ,41.41;i14:".'.r.kr\I 4\' '''. iktl: ' 1 \\ \\ \ \ ‘ \w 171! .Y ' F \.: �", {�'.�..y 1 yt't, . ' rj _ . . . ,. ' 1? 4 , _ ....... ., , • . . i 450 „. . p ' • • e' • . 1 • so . , • •' ., . •°' . .,.. •1 s' 1 !?, ' , • /Path of left front body overhang , I , e# ••# . , . .• • . . •- . • • „, . I.,......_. :.......... ...... • .., ' . • ... •... F-""*.----......"...' ... • 90° , • . . 4.2 ...... ........... . , , • . .•... Path of left front wheel • ......' 15,21 . •-°. • • ,... ....,....-dIsss.,..... . .0 •O. %....00 . so . . . . •,„ ....., \,. . . ,•,, . .„ • , ,-- 45,Radius . ,,.%.„ ,„.• . •- ''■ '.•• "•• .• ,, 0 • • ...# • `• ,, ,' , ' i e‘ • .. .. . .1 I \ ••,. I I \ 29.8'Radius .4., • . , • , . . is . . . . • , • . 1 • ■ , . o• . . • . , • ; . sO • • • .4.1/44. i, ,s - Beginning / -Path of right rear Wheel . • • . of turn 1 tt 1 ■ 0. s I s ( %, 1 D • 1350 I -. • I I Is . 4•, . .... 4 , ‘‘s . i ., 40,01 • . ,Yi ' :. 1 . $ $ $ III" Wilt II 1 MIN I 0 I I 1 • 1 8.5 ,, 1 , • 1 i1 ,.. i , t 1 • I , 1 i Minimum Radius 87'.6" . TEXT REPERENCE B.2 TURNING ThM PLATE STANDARD DESIGN_................__ , , VEHICLE - -- ( Stdoddrds ror Bus Rebted IROdd Irnprovernerifs z , u to , Fig •_,_..,...L.- . ... .....,;,,...,.......;„..„,..,...,.,,,,,,,.....,.,,,,,.;,,,..... ,.....„...........„,,........,...............L..„,,,,..._...„.......,,.........„,„:„...,„,,,,,,.,„„,,,„,,,,,,,„4.„..,„„„:;‘, ,.„.,„ .., .........,:. . „ , ,„,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,......„,----------------,—..---...., a. • • • • • (• • it 1 i • I 1 1 R 80' r I P • ! 1 O' 15' s 1 • I. r t r• ; PARKING DISTANCE • x aur o 1 ,� =fo e Turn • • CASE 1 'e r - .,0 4 3 35'.'. ! ..,.,yr, '; y Y 20' ,,,yi .riii...r :ri.i....a ii{Yyryjf, +.iri• +"��.w / • rte. r ,o10.,,,w. r.w•r ~i � iS �w .• wi w+ L y:,•'L'4.. j y SNLP•RKiNG "-- .,, CASE 2 ww'�•y, �`� `s, '�' 115, CASE 3 4.jr. ....., sl, i `.. I E 'y X l R 40' ���� t, j S • i r i i i I % 1 R d0_ • i 1 I I . i i I ' • I . z.... I Ii I I: 1 1• • R 75' • 1 ■ I , 5 I ! a: y; 4 t REFERENCE . TEXT } .!„' 1. � � RV E S 1, Standards for ties Related Road Improvements 1, 1 Figute C.2 'i: y', 1 v , .. - k, .cis, d.. ,., ,,q -..., �": � . t .. "f'aa4.001tni0tItr-vsdrN*art+ra+n.,+r:.�F# .... n aa..ctara».n .w r.,...,..,,.mu-.i...».„,,,.,, �irt.,_v.._.ax -«......u•;..,..P..^,a.h.a•".firt.....AS*,4....... ! tlrFtCt'lq.•..va.R 111,: .r.--— .. ... .- ......... .. .... rInn..........., -....---.....--.—,, "'"----_,........_.............. . .. . • , . . . . . • ww . w■ ••■.••■■■■■••• .., i ................. I 0 1-I, .. i I . , I I I I -..,...70,.: • 4•-•.;,..; 1 Iiqili, IC I I[.... • . •'••'•v• ) , I I I LOCAL STOP WITH SIDEVVALK I I ::;.0.1. Bus 1 ..3.k...;,.... •i:: ,11 I Construct new sidewalk up to 10'in •.-.., I r.i,"4","..t I width to match existing sIdewalk 4., 4 . ,.'.4 1 — ., 1 :. f•............. ,.,. I ..4•0 :i ):,.1.•:),;:4 I .i I =- I .....r.1.F,) - ' ••1.I:,:W.t■..J.:...,.1.%'-4:4.l , • 1,,,,t 30'Minimum ________. ..._____T--..- ,--...n.......-,*.enr,rn. nr,"'771P- I ---.........-..- ..'',„•;......*,;0:•:.ifi.V.I.,q,'.7.•:f.V.,,,-;•ri..% 414%.,■!..V.",4*;1.72-0:1 ))‘ ro.:,X..-;.1y,1"..... ,..'illAi?..it!is,'.1:44.z.i:O.;.,13i;:lp.=!..t.rt?:,:...: , ... . , . , Bus 1 . . .... 1 I I : 4 . . . , . are, II ‘,.... ., , . .. ......... , . ......"'N'IS, LOCAL STOP WITHOUT SIDEWALK I . . ,:ci,ieg T 1 ,,,,...,....v..1 I ,if..(t;:.i' . •. I i t re.'t•; . I 1 yl",:i: ..:.:i --4-•-- 3-Construct 0,of 5'Sidewalk 1,,:•i,4i-..., .••.0,... ; I ': * '19. q :i",: . ty I Bus poo.;,... I I 1 "Pit I I I I ,• -I. , • 1 1 I . ) i Note. I I . . Keep Oil boulevard feature (hydrants,Signs,poles,etc)a minimum of 2'behind curb, TEXT REPERENCE D, 1 . . , BUS STOP REQUIREMENTS , ,IN „. ikk...... 8tanddrds For 13us Belated load Improvements FigUre b.1 .,,, ,,.. , } .. . . f' • - . , . . ., .. . .. ( . . . I.. 4-8u 4.... . 1.34 tylcY _ ...._...0... "."-: 7.."'....1. ...................T -I . ,-,==.....-.. . = . . . . . I 46" i , . 7-0" 8-0 • It 4 .., .. . FP------ ------------------1.r.-----------=- . . . z A ; Nj NI ........... . , i t FRONT ELEVATION sEcnoN .', .., .i , •o • 6" 1,,i,, 17— ie.°. 444------ N ; I I . i___, _ ............ _ ................. .._......... 1 I .. , 1 .....................■, ,......p.1.0•■•■• , PLAN SECTION END ELEVATION 1 I . . . . TYPE.„ ... .. STANDARD D TYPE A S SHELTER i _ REFE sitihddeds ot'But Felted odci mprovemeThEt>: RENCE b‘2 , . le_ k.... . . , . , Figure .2 • . „ , ,, ......,„,„.. ...0,,,,,,...,1,0,1,44.r.1.4:t.1.1■0**60,6,0,1,,,,,,.e.ovimoktoo ' SS . . • i. . C- M. 1 Y. • f Y' '1 ."".�., I • a-.. N t 1 FRONT ELEVATION END ELEVATION t l' A ff7} IY . • 5'-O" f r 1a 17 r JI « r MAN SECTION r , wy i. • SECTION i • 'f g Ii R 11 t `r, 4 t TEXT REFERENCED:2 TY " 'P ' B STANDARD SHELTER . ,,, . Stdnddrds 5dr Bus Reldfed Rodd Improvements ,. • . Pitjuto D.3 II I a rW NM yr,:, ,t'pr .m++w u s ear :.:..a ry.a=a „a. «Ap l -x n:. wwiu,«a�G a +prwv,i.�iwWksaia?vY arra.,igw':,w:ti +q*S:+dM+73kk.5rgpy4.. .�;rt. - ar�i,.M.4.i•..Hi�'m+N4Y '.,�'a?'k�k4A# 'r1Y�.Ml4!I - 11 ;1^t i'Iti1.�• "�"m-�'Y' .gPM'R'«'kl ,1JAIY�{"1L153'4�!w.`Pi6`aNYLiV 2"4.uc�:.�:iu..w.wt..J{-� ;, :.7'` k--T.-------"---"-'t tt • r fSS}✓✓9y: °s,'''�a ;i:y 3•';v.*:77. MI L.•H,rgi tii .{.,i 5:?`�'y�i.�4;c;Y,+r���$$:C^^i�:%r<Y q�ti+,:;$.t,��,�;�,��t°o*St r•��"fx''ti�� E �. ., , . iv 'i KY 's't f s r . 4 k;,.. Y,•<..w�a.:;'x'.•fS...4 • -l '`.�{h✓S r?,, :? k rr •,<4 k X r,k','tC';•i:3y.� ,, ..4/t T•::*V.,y f.s::if},ir i{d:4:5::�';S'.r,S,s ; ;f5 Sty}•:,,''- i,:(4::::)$:;:}*f+,,:$., ,,:p4.4 ft,*n 7 4 fi Y 4y'Sr x'l,,nO.Sr :v1,t ° {%,,,,,,,k,:....:'.,•,,,*$..:$.:V,,:*,,,,,,.,,,,*.` p A `:r'fi:,••N : + >• t h w t>z Kk :f t k'k•%n fsai•::;F.rt r ks A•f+.y V.r• y ' tf¢ y r : �• s f•r Y. •Y f.. t4::tf ,+i• r •h.•� ✓,St, r ✓:,j•'y+•oSa,ild;$,......<•,.44.• 's.c2f�; S .t`4•:{• ,�,., Minimum 4.0 i >} 'fY;Tyt i Building Wails,A'< ::$tffxo;. • sr:.. t "Li t..y ki l,*•,; Ti I 2 Mln m ' ;;. +r, :.<:. ,�;, ,r � t }„ SHELTEt2 LOCATION GUIDL NE5 •Su:;4,S:...: 'p±4y?:.v{:•.Y{;.n �' wo f::w: ° yt�r'4yT.� , 1 ✓t•frt:.::t 464:....::::,.:a R tk,'+*. 34:fj;;y). `.,..„?�.3��<y6"�s'�r{4F,�•�::y.r(� 5 ,hY;2ifi; f4%•.,'T:k'1'�°`.';C�:':+.,:ry/°�4w4+s •`'✓i'#;;r '"• <Y n': ;j .'4^`tiny• i • 4 t:.:.{s.:�:Il f$'•:Y::s:;;,:.ri k�0,f : { : {�W m curb,with doorways not c :,• ; :{ 1.Minimum 2 from r4t..rr:cr{:;•� .i<'� ^�f i�t' : }:.:*�`r��d4p��,ntrh air•' � ttyG:i• f;•s•y^{,Yy f�r.:y�`,.,'•.''.t,•;.^•.a'.,'v:::'•tr'`.a+n'a;,•.'•SG�iyk.', yt ,y; �,,, ff '° d0k:• �' Shelter facing curb, .<f ✓n y{4..3tdY.f':::::.S•.,.y.7k?+i>:f::;.q r.yQ,•6•�i•n.`t.° '�� > ;.X?i.`•:f {:yJ:�,,>y•r,• :.+,>;3'°•++33xri'Y'`•'t,v''t•! .'.',`;S:�y'3++.� r�- 'fiy ;;+4•sY.0:k4:'.<.Y}'4�/i:§'loth yr TA s.° •, Prel r t, 2,Locate 6 from building wall to allow for a, ' ,,,D,'::253 Y:i'.. •'..,?k,i,;:••3: v;.. ; .")3S'pa A.:*:,f rt> r , I t✓,,,N •� • ' �°$%tcr< y t ° ,,:.•t :•, cleaning rytt#tfkf%y+✓''':t# • NS.,'Shy.%i`':`siiay o'�2}',%':'YT' 9{{,,,,{�;js+Yr'f�•', �J e i . ; : N;?t f*,'; k1 '•�.1 f s: ;` .�,Ys�:'k 'f<.,••_ Bus 3,Nllnlmum 5 sidewalk by-pass on one side of p d�,, :.,,..?f/k risk:x,;.y...4.-;••.4,,.,,—..:{y''3k yT : t (. cl...,.., 'S k f.. ; � ,°.,..4,G r 4..^yy$4.y ,, ..-,-/,,,, shelter in alt cases, FF." :: *.....:k : :'`'S%:r }5 0 -1, :;So l':.,1 5�r ..� +�.;. rt,,. 3: �..,. Minimum 4 Do not locate shelter In front of bus doors{';fz>rrw:f:nta:i:4'k... ...k.:r, {ygP., kbr.ffY }:• . - .. S Existing Sidewalk p Y prevailing ' without minimum 5'distance, 5r Attempt t to face doors away from ' 6"Clearance winds In open areas, • Alternate • ' from building 6,Locate shelter In accordance with sighf i 5'Minimum distance requirements for cross street traffic, . • , -poi. &Is . i �.,,,� eft•l° tr?..1•414't/'ti`r. -... , 'IO / 11 . Minimum ,..,, ..{,.!,•!. 't V,.•..0.,... ,,,-,' !' •' Existing Sidewalk Existing SIdewalk Shelter location for serving two st^ s .y.47, -.. ._ BU S �5i . ;=;rt= �,,,'-$ :: � , � `V 30' ' i of :iii;• y s:.•r ,., � ;It.f. BUS f P New sidewalk • • . Blew sidew a ,, ':/ . I R' I. TEXT REFERENCE Da 2 I a SL tandards Far Bus Related I7oad Improverrlehfs b Figure , • ^+*de .w•.ew, •Mir+.MG r/ y.✓.wa ¢ J. w . n..M4._ ..•. ,.:P...,,c ":i,I.0 tii'-ir•iYWµ.1+i•Irw �..,µ.. _....._.._ ......_4 .T• rcv , sur nM^"•k P.♦.y...+.u......._..w}..n•-re.wa•...•+ ...r..-....ww'N. ur. r.e f , • � • �I �WIffil , yt, WILLIAMS & GILHAM . . . ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS P.C, 3777 S,E. MI LWAUKIE AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97202 PH.(503)232-1196 Lr s', MAX P,WILLIAMS, ARCHITECT,M.A. cvo LOU$S C. GILHAM, ARCHITECT May 20 , 1980 Mr. Aldie Howard Director of Planning City of Tigard 12420 S .W. Main Tigard, Or 97223 RE Main Street Development Dear Mr. Howard In accordance with our conversation, this letter is to verify our intent to submit the proposed Main Street Development for the Juno 3rd Planning Commission meeting . This submittal is for the preliminary review of the zone change application from C3M to C3MPD. This request is for approval in principal of the preliminary development plan and is not intended to be a final approval of the overall project; rather it is merely the planning commission s approval of the proposed land use The final plan may be changed to conform to the resolution of certain concerns voiced both by the Tigard Planning Staff and the Devoloper. The concerns referred to specifically is the impact of this development upon the City of Tigard ' s traffic patterns , the effect that this project may or may not havehave on sensitive lands and a resolution of the pr'perty to the east of Highway 99 that is not presently under the Oeveloper ' s control but incorporated within this project ' s frontage . It is our proposal that these primary concerns be resolved to the staff' s satisfaction prior to submitting this development to the Planning Commission for general and final approVal , Very truly yours , WILL Ams & , I IAM ouis .1) LCG/bas CC: J , 8 i8hop ..Y • '`gas station, requested Council uphold the appeal as business is k suffering due to the obscruing of the signs from Highway 217. Opponents: None (d) Planning Director requested Council deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's findings. (e) Public Hearing Closed (E) Motion by Councilman Brian, seconded by Councilman Cook to deny appeal and uphold Planning Commission's findings. Approved by majority 3-1 vote of Council present. Councilman Scheckla voting Nay. Planning Director 7eit 9:00 P.M. 17. LERON HEIGHTS INr ERCEPTOR DISCUSSION I (a) Mr. J. Allan Paterson, 11605 SW Manzanita, requested Council take action to . i make a determination regarding the funds being held by the City for Leron Heights sewer connections. Mr. Paterson noted his attorney, Mr. George Burney was present if anyone had any questions of him. Mr. Paterson requested Council release funds being held, and if collection was too much of a burden to the City that Leron Heights Interceptor would take it over. (b) Lengthy discussion followed regarding the right df the City to collect funds, hold funds, and to the legality of the contract which was signed with the Leron Heights Interceptor Corporation. (c) Motion by Councilman Brian to release impounded funds with whatever interest that might be due and that the contract continue to run its course and the City not continue to collect funds for connection to the interceptor for Leron Heights Interceptor Corporation. Motion seconded by Councilman Cook. Approved by,unanimous vote of Council present. 18. G I. JOES/WAREMART PRELIMINARY PLAT APPEAL REQUEST CONSIDERATION (a) A letter was presented from Mr. Stephen T Janik, attorney for J. B. Bishop, withdrawing appeal, noting that Planning Commission will reconsider the matter v at its June 3, 1980 meeting. RESOLUTION No. 80-42 A RESOLUTION 19• RC UTI0N REQUESTING RECONSIDERATION OF THE POSTED SPEED ZONE(S) ON S.W. 121ST AVENUE BETWEEN SW SCROLLS FERRY ROAD AND SW WALNUT STREET. Director of public Works recommended Council approve" request (a) Di pprov`e resolution and re uest State Speed Control. Board to consider changing the posted speed zones on 121st Avenue. (b) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to adopt and forward to the State Speed Control Board. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. PACE 5 = COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 19, 1980 era...w,..q.y•..0 :vna.,er v r..... +..+wyww«.,,...«.w.�wr.,.ro—r•°w+la..+w-a�PFm!net^der fi�YAtT7�P".."a7E.ai.:CiR4+v«y"`5.,..G:A'-,S',1=Ysu6'.TM""`Y+'L...e„- �M a 4 . •r 20. 72ND AVENUE STATUS REPORT (a) Director of Public works noted that 51.3% of the properties in the LTD area have signed a petition and that Washington County, Southern Pacific Railroad and Pacific Trust have stated they will not remonstrate against an LID which would bring the total up to 81.6%. Director of Public Works recommended that Council proceed with the project and hire a consultant to do the preliminary study. ' A (b) Council requested staff suggest and rank 2 or 3 engineering firms which could do this large of a job and report back at the June 2nd Council meeting. 21. OTHER (a) City Administrator advised Council that Professor Knutson of State Conciliation " Service and Lewis & Clark College has been selected to be the factfinder by the City staff and. TPOA. Factfinding will be Tuesday, May 27,, 1980, at 9:00 A.M. and will continue all day. City Administrator recommended Council hire a '. professional i in factfinding and suggested Mr. Fred Larson with Lon rMillsoand FAssociates.C�His fee is $50.00 per hour, and he would assist the City in factfinding and arbitration. Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Brian to authorize the City ,. Administrator to hire Mr. Fred Larson to represent the City in factfinding and arbitration. • Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (b) City Administrator state he checked with O.D.O.T. regarding the hours the contractor could work on the TSM project to see if rush hour could be •,i avoided.. According to the state, if the City were willing to pick up the cost of the contractor working overtime, perhaps a contract revision could • be signed so as to aVoid work being done during rush hour in the morning Currently, working hours .are between 6 AM and 3 PM. Council did not wish to make any changes in the contract at this time. 22. ADJOURNMENT 10:O1 P.M. 'ecorder ATTEST r.prryr,I i .,: Mayor } f PACt•► 6 - COUNCIL MINUTt8 - MAY 19, 1980 wtw Y x m ,' ?-4';''' FIECENtitt ,r A as wTCE , RIVES, E , FRASER � 0 1 (DAVIES, OIGGS,STRAYER,STOEL AND BOLEY) [g�/�{��Rf i 1t./ f'. A' (RIVES, BONYHADt & 5M1'TH) tt7 LAW OFFICES ALLAN R.ABRAVANEL ROBERT H.HUNTINGTON I JEFFREY MICHAEL ALDeN STEPHEN T.JANI K 900 S W FIFTH AVENUE l RICHARD E.ALEXANDER VEL,MA JEREMIAH Courure 1 RICHARD D.BACH RICHARD C.JOSEPHSON PORTLAND, ORF.c S)N 97204 DAVID 1_,DAVIEB PAUL L.BOLEY JOEL,D.KUNT2 HUGH L.sloGs r ERNEDT BONYHADI DEXTER E.MARTIN HARPY O.CHNDsER WILLIAM M.MeALLIST MURC'ER GAIL LES F. ER.iA NORMAN D.HOLLY HARRY 5,CHANDLER CHARLES J.McMURCHIE (503)224-3?f30 GAIL L,ACHTERMAN SUSAN M.HAMMER , i CLEVELAND C,CORY GEORGE IK4MEIMR,rfl KAREN K.CREASON DAVID FS MILLER STEPHEN E,BABSON PAMELA L.JACKLfN THOMAS P.DEERING GREGORY R.MOWS MARGARET M.BAUMGARDNER PETER R,JARVIS I JOHN DETJENS,T.Q HARDY MYERS WILLIAM A.BERG GREGORY F.JENNER BARNES H.ELLIS THOMAS R,NICOLAI JOHN A.BOODANSKI JENNIFER J,JOHNBON ;, EDWARD L.EPSTEIN MILO E.oRMSETH JOHN F BRADACH CHARLES S.LEWIS,Ui HOWARD M.FEUERSTEIN TERRENCE R.PANCOAST G -t O HENRY C.BREITHAUPT DENNIS LEYeOLD r' , . RICHARD A.FRANZKE MARK H.pETERMAN May 16, 1.9 o O MATTHEW W.CHAPMAN GREGORY H•MACpHERSoN HE GEORGE H.FRASER CAMPBELL RICHARDSON BERTRAND J.CLOSE DANIEL W.MEEK I GEORGE M.GALLOWAY ROBERT L.RIDGLEY NANCY L,GOWGILL WILLIAM E,MERRITT ! LEONARD A.GIRARD GEORGE D.RIVES C.PAUL DAGLE THOMAS H.NELSON 1..' WILLIAM J.GLASGOW RICHARD E.ROY E.JOSERH DEAN MARGARET HILL NOTO r. • GERSHAM GOLDSTEIN JOHN H,SCHWEITZER CHRISTINE L,DICKEY THOMAS R.PAGE RONALD S,OROasMANN PATRICK J.sIMPSON GUY OsEY CHARLES H.ARRINO O N HUGH SMITH SUSAN R GRABENER LOTS O, osENB MARK R.F FIGHTING ER QRU CE K.P RANDOLPH C.POSTER GUY A,RAN ■ ROBERT F;HARRINGTON THOMAS B.STOEL SENBAUNt JOHN R.HAY MANLEY C1.STRAYER v RICHARD A,HAYDEN,JR, JERE M.WEB DAVID W.GREEN JAMES RA SOTREINZ I STEPHEN L.ORIF'FITH ANN E,THOMPBON DAVID G.HAYHURST MARCUS R.WICKS THOMAS G.P.GUIt_HERT E.WALTER VAN VALKENBURG HENRY H.HEWITT MARCUS WOOD CHARLES F.HINKLE WILLIAM W,WYSE City Recorder , , City Counsel o City of Tigard, Tigard City Hall 12420 SW Main •, Tigard, Oregon 97223 VDear City Recorder and Members of the City Council: Re: Main Street Development Zone Change Request, ZCPD 6-80 Pursuant to our letter dated May 1, 1980 we initiated an appeal to the City Council of the Planning Commission' s • denial of our client' s request for a zone change from C-3M ' "Main street Commercial" to C-3MPD °Main Street Commercial Planned Development District. In recent conversations with members of your staff, .6 whose assistance in this matter has been appreciated, we have that it may be ' ae t determined may p at its June 3 , 198 O expeditious more e� edit�:ous to have this matter reconsidered by the Planning Commission a " , ,-, Meeting. We have been advised that it will be feasible for n to us on this date. Therefore, • the Planning Commis s '�.o o hear based on these discussions with your staff, we hereby withdraw our request for a hearing before the City Council and our I appeal -of the Planning Commission' s previous def ision. IThank you very much for your attention on this matter. Very t i ours, • rt ifr . F rn W. s n, k S' aday • cc Mr, ►,Toe Bailey Mr. Aldie toward 1 M . a. 13. Bishop Mr: I# a, Buchholz a. • • . V o. , Y n.,.+ I..R .rYia u,.r. r4::.. a,.M-.+y u .-4 „A!tl • '... `1, , . . , • . . Ir' % l'''' • . '‘... ) RECENT:0 1 ( ( , , ,., . 1 . 9 .• STOEL, RIVES, BOLEY, FRASER AND WYSE MAY 1 1980 , )1 (DAVIES, BIGGS.STRAYER,STOEL, AND a OLEY) CO Of TIGARD L (RIVES,BONYHADI & SMITH) c ALLAN Rs AGRAVANEL ROEJERT H.HUNTINGTON LAW 0 prices I JEFFREY MICHAEL ALDEN STEPHEN T.JANIK W A S F RICHARD E.ALEXANDER VELMA JEREM 900 tFTH VENUE IAH COM.901 . ' RICHARD D.EACH RICHARD C.JOGEPHSON PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 DAVID L.,DAVies PAUL L.SOLEY JOEL 0.KUNTZ,„ HUGH L.EKG09 P ERNEST19014THADI DEXTER E.MARTIN ..............-..... PHILLIP D.tHAosey WILLIAM m.mcALusTER f . . HARM'S.cHANDLeR CHARLES..LMeMURCHIE (503)224-3380 GAIL L.AcHTERMAH SUSAN MO HAMMER' . CLEVELAND C.CORY 0 coRGE K.MMIER,Ca CHARLES F.ADAMS NORMAN D.HOLLY KAREN%t.CREASON DAVID P.MILLER , STEPHEN E.BABSON PAMELA L•JACKLIN THOMAS P.oecHIND GREGORY FI•HOWE MAROARET M.SAUMGARDNER PETER FLJARVIS ll . JOHNOETJENS,III HARDY 4YR9 WILLIAM A.etno GREGORY F.JENNER , BARNES H.ELLIS THOMAS R.NICOLAI JOHN A.130GDANSKI JENNIFER J.JOHNSON , EDWARD L.EPSTEIN MILO E,03FiNiSTH JOHN PI BRACACH CHARLES S.LWIS,DI H■ • HOWARD M.reuensTem Ter4FIENct F.pANcoAsT HENRY Ci SREITHASPT DENNIS LEYSOLD . ptcHARDA,.FRANZKE MARK H.PETERMAN May 16, 1980 MATTHEW Wo CHAPMAN GREGORY m.,MACPHERSON" GEORGE H.FRASER CAMPSELL RICHAFMSON SERTRAND .1.CLOSE DANIEL W.MEEK • GEORGE M.GALLOWAY ROM ERT Le RIDGLEY NANCY L,DoWDILL WILLIAM IL MERRITT LEONARD A.OIRARD GEORGE O.RIVES C.PAUL DAOLE THOMAS H.NELSON I, WILLIAM J.GLASGOW RICHARD E.ROY E.JOSEPH DEAN MARGARET HILL NOTO GERSHAM GOLDSTEIN JOHN M.SCHWEITZER CHRISTINE L.DICKEY THOMAS FLPAOE ". . , . RONALD S.OROSSMANN• PATRICK J.SIMPSON MARK R.mcNTINo ER sHUcs K.POSEY CHARLES M.mAseRNioo HUom SMITH RANDOLPH C.FOSTER GUY A.RANDLES ROSERT F.HAFtRINoToN THOMAS S.STOEL ANDREW R,GARONER LOTS O.NosENDAum JOHN R.HAY MANLEY S.STRAYER SUSAN p.GRABER STEVEN SCROGGIN ..4,... RICHARD A4i4AYDEN.JR. Jellemovess DAVID W.GREEN JAMES RAY STREINZ DAVID 0.HAYHURST' CLARENCE PI WICKS STEPHEN L.GRIFFITH ANN E.THOMPSON '' ■ • HENRY H.HEWITT MARCUS WOOD THOMASO.P.GUILBERT E.WALTER VAN VALKENSLIRG CHARLES F.HINKLE WILLIAM W.wyse r; City Recorder City Counsel City of Tigard, Tigard City Hall , 12420 SW Main . . , , . Tigard, Oregon 97223 . li Dear City Recorder and Members of the City Council: ., . .• Re: Main Street Development Zone Change Request, , . ZCPD 6-80 . . . , PUrsuant to our letter dated May 1, 1980 we initiated an appeal to the City Council of the Planning Commission' s , . denial of our client' s request for a zone change from C-3M "Main Street Commercial" to C-3MPD "Main Street Commercial Planned Development District. " ,, in recent conversations with members of your staff - , . • Whose assistance in this matter has been apprediated, we have , determined that it may be more expeditious to have this matter . / reconsidered by the Planning Commission at its June 3 , 1980 • meeting. We have been advised that it will be feasible for the Planning ComMission to hear us on this date. Therefore, based on these discussions with your staff, we hereby withdraw • our request for a hearing before the City Council and our appeal Of the Planning COmmission 8 previous decision. .. • . Thank you very much for your attention on this matter. 1 • ) Very t, 1/0 ours, 11 , 1 4 /0110. r 1 4 r -,.. STJ:Cay Odt Mr. Joe Bailey Mr. Aidie Roward Mr. a, 8. Bishop Mr. R. a. Buchhc12 , • , , .. • % , l i , ` )." 1; 1, • (,I I ji 1' 1 * ' i . / ; 3 1 . 6..16".."*.?".4.4 4.''''e."' ifr\N---"....." \ i ! . cet.......e....dt.........4........e........er-1,/1/4....-./,,....../6 ` , l oic,,,.."1, ...e..--er--X--- /e4.:///11 A . f : I' ■ ', Ii. i 11. If( ` l' 1 f1. it ' V, • } 1f w a..j...,aA....,« ...N7n•a.3�+.,a+` w•�„r.3 a-...�» .•�•..w.: ..... .....:.._.._...-........... .-+.�,.F- .. .,.w,ra� ... C'+-! �,. ....._ ..,.h+'-ur+w;-wfa�hN'M'..xil!�a�rAl;vB':Rtr�»�':'in.h.�:•--`..;..��.:..4••t`N'.a`u.3.i • '0 �, { rlA RE l' R MAINSTREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD. Suite 303 cE1 1 1980 VE 10505 SW Barbur Blvd. Portland, OR 97219 Tigard City Council j c/o City of Tigard Tigard City Hall Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mayor Mickelson and Members of the City Council : RE: Appeal of MAINSTREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD. ' s denial of 7 , a Zone Change Request MAINSTREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD. is an Oregon Limited Partner- ship, made up of JB Bishop and the Buchholz family, formed in 1978 for the specific purpose of developing the Buchholz property and any adjoining properties as needed and which might become available for long-term investment . Our development proposal is a culmination of planning extending back seven years, initially by the Buchholz family and now involving another Tigard native. The pro- posed final type size and t e of development is designed specifically to accomodate the numerous historic and present I. including:concerns of many,. g landowners, local residents and downtown merchants and property owners, past and present City of Tigard elected and staff officials, NPO #1, the Park , • Board, the State Highway Department, and the applicants have keyed from various in-put from the above bodies which has lead to the site t s final configuratioa and specific site plan. f We ask that you consider our request for a hearing, per the attached letter from the City of Tigard, dated April 29, 1980, and upon reflection of a letter dated May , 1980, 1 directed to the City Council from out legal counsel, Steve Janik. Mrs. Doris Hartig, has informed us that there are ample s respectfully 1980, meeting agenda to On openings on the scheduled May l:9 19 allow this request, We r espectfully desire to be placed that docket or at any subsequent meetings that will meet with your approval. - ♦ ,. __ .«,..+.w w•.v..,;'.,«,,a.. .u..;..,...,,::,... :., .. ,. ,..,.......;: . .,.._ :,....r •LnP{'t i.4.�P.iL�„rs,am,.0..na;,.w.w-....n.ww,......, "'% • N. r („,,,.._. r. i Page T;wo': Tigard City 'Council `' Sincerely, . MAINSTREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD . .'. , / . ,,, • � •• . I �� i 1'• Herin J.. Buchho .z ' JB Bishop ?;. ., General Partner General Partner ,.. , , , JBB:ct I.' cc: Tigard City Manager :� Tigard City Recorder I;• City of Tigard Legal Council,, Joe Bailey '' • Steve Janik is 0. rt: 1 . . • v j',. , , . .n v r• ■ H ex`M 1 4 Y! �Y"M ::'� `,',. -:. '.. - ... ..._ I. ..... ,. wsMC•.A ,w. 4ns mGe G .1, dr. M.a.,gic.µWyv*S„ r. .. ♦... .•.4 . I..., �' �MW7+tl$y16i�}rpt,'�v�i4'A_Yl..M Y.,,tlA!:::'y�$;f-".f.tkA•"+' 1ti,Myq,. • 1 r ` . r ChTfOFTITAIRD WASHt NGTON COUNTY.OREGON April 29, 1980 MAIN STREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD. , • 10505 SW Barber Blvd. , Suite 303 Portland, Oregon 97219 RSFEPENCE: ZONE CHANCE" PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCa.U' 6-80 Dear Sir: Please be advised that the Ticlard P1alninq Co:ttltlus.S'iotr' at their meeting of April 22, ,1980, denied your x;aquest for a Zone Change Planned Develop ent • District in reference to the above project.' • This proposal was denied due to an inadequate design of access to Highway 99 and the tie-in to Main Street, and an unsettled floodplain-greenbelt question. Action of the Planning Commission is final snles.s notification of appeal to the City Council is filed with the City Recorder within twenty (20) days of ' the Planning Commissions s action • If we can be of arty further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact this office at 639-4171. Sin ly Al. i award ,n. arming Director Al1vrnc • • 12420 S=W, MAIN P.0, BOX 23397 TIG .RD, OREGON 97223 PH: 639-4171 /Y i..... „• :..,r -.w '^w,..,.M..+,+ir t,'.°Yn.hµtd;,"*.1v'"i:G'"`i.r. ... r 'N ' : . . . ,"-;".%. (,), . 11/4 '''4,/ , ' , C . . . STOEL, HIVES, BOLEY, FRAsER AND WYSE M (DAVIES, EGGS,STRAYER,STOEL AND BOLEY) ' .,• (RIVES, SONYHADI & SMITH) . , ALLAN R.ABRAVAN EL RosERT H.HUNTINGTON LAW OFFICES JEFFREY MICHAEL ALDEN STEPHEN T.JAW K . .• •, ' RICHARD E,ALEXANDER VELMA aEREMIAH 900 S W FIFTH AVENUE Counsel ,' RICHARD a.eAcH PncHARD c•UosepHSoN PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 DAVID L.bAVIEs RAUL I.,BOLEY JOEL D.KUNTz HUGH L.BIGGS . ERNEST BONYHAD I DEXTER E.MARTIN - ........** , pHILLIp D.cHADsEY WILLIAM M.MeALLISTER HARRY S6 CHANDLER CHARLES J.McMURCHIE (5031 224-3350 GAIL L.AcHTERmAN SUSAN m.HAMMER .' CLEVELAND c.CoRY GEoRGE K.MEIER,111 CHARLES g ADAMS NORMAN D.HE'LL? KAREN K.CASON DAVID p.MILLER STEPHEN E.BABSON • PAMELA L,JAcKLIN THOMAS R DEERING GREGORY R•MoWE MARGARET M.DAUMGARDNER PETER 14.JARVIS ' JOHN DETJENS.GT HA,/DY MYERS WILLIAM A.BERG GREGORY g JENNER • BARNES H.ELLIS THOMAs R.NicOLAI May 1, 1980 JoHN A.BOGDANSKI .JENNIFER J.JoHNSoN EDWARD L.EpsTEIN MILD E.ORMsETH JOHN F BRADACH CHARLES s.LEM%at HOWARD M.rEUERsTEIN TERRENCE R.pANcoAsT HENRY c.BREITHAURT DENNIS LEYBOLD RicHARp A.FRANZKE MARK H.PETERMAN MATTHEW W.CHAPMAN GREGORY H.mAL.OHERsoN ' . GeoRGE.H.rRAsER CAMPBELL RICHARDsON sERTRAND J.CLOSE bANteL W.MEEK . t GEORGE M.ciALLoWAY ROBERT I.,RIDGLE,Y NANCY L,GoWGILL WILLIAM E.M ERRITT ce '. LeoNAPID A.GIRARD 0 EORGE D.RIVES c.RAUL bAG LE THOMAS H.NELsoN . WILLIAM J.GLASGOW RICHARD E.ROY E.JOSEPH DEAN M.ARGARET HILL No,o ,• GERsHAM GoLDsTEIN JOHN m.scHWEITkER CHRISTINE L.DIcKEY THOMAS R.PAGE ,., .• RONALD s.GRossMANN PATRICK J.siMPsoN MARK R.rElcHTING ER BRUCE K.posEY ,:i CHARLES H. I3 071AsERNIGG HUGH SMITH RANDoLPH c,FOSTER GUY A.RANDLEs ROBErIT F.HARRINOTON THOMAS ,sTo EL ANDREW R.GARbNER Lois O.ROSENIBAUM JOHN R.HAY MANLEY B.STRAYER SUSAN P,GRAElEr STEVEN SCRoGGIN • RICHARD A.HAyDEN,JR. JERE M.WEBS DAVID VW GREEN JAMES RAY sTREANz DAVlb 0.HAYHUR3T CLARENCE R.W1oKs STEPHEN L.oRIFFITH ANN E YHOMpsoN :.f HENRY F1-.111ilit'srlITiLt MARCUS W000 WILLIAM W.WYSE THOMAS G.P.GUILBERT E.WALTER VAN VALKENBURG • • City Recorder • City Council .. . . City of Tigard Tigard City Hall Tigard, OR 97223 ... Dear City Recorder and Members of the City Council: Re: Main Street Development Zone Change Request, ZCPD 6-80 This is to advise you that we are legal counsel for ' • Main Street DevelOpment, Ltd. , U. B. Bishop and Herm Buchholz, the owners and developers of approximately 11.5 acre parcel *. of property located on the south end of Main Street in • . Tigard. This property was the subject of Zone Change No. ZCPD 6-80, which was heard by the Planning Commission on , . April 22 , 1980. On that date, the Planning COmmisSion denied • our request for a tone change from C-3M "Main Street Commer- cial' to C-3MPD 'Main Street Commercial Plan Development District. ° Pursuant to Chapter 18. 56 Ahd 18. 92 of the Zoning .• , Code of the City of Tigard, we hereby appeal the decision of ,---„,, ., .-, the Planning COMmission to the City Council, ThiS letter • constitutes our notice of appeal and request for a heating by the City Council on this matter. • ..1 The reasons for this appeal are as follows: . . 1. The Planning Commission failed to apply the standards set forth in Chapter 18,56, specifically Section 18,56. 020 (b) . That Oedtion providest "Stich action shall be based upon the Comprehensive Plan, the standards of . , this title, and other regulations and ,...,..,.- the suitability of the proposed develop- ment in relation to the character df the . . area, ° , • STOEL,RIVES,13OLEY,FRASEl2 AND WYSE Tigard City Recorder Tigard City Council May 1, 1980 Page 2 Instead of applying these standards, the Planning Commission applied policies which have not been adopted by the City Council and have no legal force or effect. 2. The Planning Commission failed to properly follow the requirements of Section 18 . 56. 020 in that the review requested was for preliminary development approval, and this review is limited to the acceptability of the land uses pro- posed and their relationships. The Planning Commission went on to consider Other factors which are not appropriate at the time of preliminary development approval aS a basis for their denial. 3. The Planning Commission failed to adopt any • findings of fact. 4. The decision of the Planning Commission is not Of supported by substantial and reliable evidence, and there was no evidence in conflict with that submitted by the applicant on the standards which are set forth in Section 18.56. 020. 5, The decision of the Planning Commission is in violation of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Tigard, the transportation plan and policies cres adopted by the City Council, and the NPO No. 1 plan. For, the above reasons, we respectfully request a hearing before the City Council to review the Planning Commissions decision. Because of the size of this proposed development and its s ;gnificance to Tigard, we anticipate q .. hearing may require more amount than other comparable i � i }4Lo 441 xt of citizen,testimony, Therefore, we appreciate i i citizen requests, can would appreciate. it if an appropriate amount of time can be reserved for this hearing. Please send all communications regarding this matter to our offices. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me, Very t YOP', 400, • ... e. .e ; i3 I: STlgb cc; Mr, J. ESL bishop Mr. Merin Iuohhol ,,,n..:.:: ,xJU:±a Lla.x...Yl .sv�.•••..nwiwwealR�uil� •..• =rC.>......«,.. .:....w ^..++--+,a...urMW+ri"'�ry Mfer.ri` .., • ,.• •.% + + J •., + y C, 4 k t. STOEL, RIVES, BOLEY, FRASER AND WYSE ' , . (DAVIES, BIGGS,STRAYER,STOEL AND E3OLEYI . 1. ,,, (RIVES, BONYHADI & SMITH) ,t , ALLAN R.ABRAvANEL ROBERT H.HUNTINGTON LAW OFFICES . . JEFFRey MICHAEL ALDEN STEPHEN T.JAW K 900 S Vti FIFTH ,601 EN U E RICHARD E,ALE/cANDeR veLma,JEREMIAH emirolei • • . RICHARD 0.elA 0 cH RIGHARD KUNTZ c.JoSEpHSON PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 DAVID L,DAVIES PALA.L.BOLE./ JOEL , . HUGH L.DIDos . ERNEBT BoNyHAIDI DexTER e,MARTIN .............*... -......-- pHILLIP 0,cHAD3EY WILLIAM M.MeALLISTER HARRY S.CHANDLER CHARLES J.MemURCHIE (503)224-3380 OAIL LAcHTERMAN SUSAN M.HAMMER • 1. ' cLevELANO c.Coq? GEORG E K.mEleR,al CHARLES F.ADAMS NORMAN 0,HOLLY KAREN K.cREASDN DAVID p,HILLER STEPHEN E.E1AesoN PAMELA L.JAcKLIN • • THomA3 R.DEERING GREGORY R.MOW MARGARET M.BAUMGARDNER PETER R,JARVIs . • JOHN CDETJENS,Irl HARDY MYERS WILLIAM A,BERG GREGORY F;JENNEn DARNEs H.ELLis THOMAS R,NICOLM May 1 1980 JOHN A,BooDANsKI JENNIFER J.JOHNSON • EDWARD L,EPSTEIN MILD E.ORMSETH JOHN F.BRADAcH CHARLES s.LEwis,ra HOWARD Ai.rEuERETEIN TERRENcE R.PANCOAST HENRY c.EIREITHAUPT 0eRNEyE H.M NolosRL6°A1-cDPHERSON •..' RICHARD A.FRANzice MARE H.pETERMAN MATTHEW W.cHARHAN 0 s , ocoRo a H.FAASen CAMPBELL RIcHARDsoN BEIRTRAND J.CLOSE DANIEL W.MEEK , . OtoRGE 61,GALLoWAY ROBERT L,RIDOLMY NANCY 1.,,GOW0ILL. WILLIAM E.MERRITT ... LEONARD A.GIRARD 0E0Rot D.RivES c,RAUL DA0LE TH0MA5 H.NeLsON • WILLIAM J.LILASDOW RICHARD E,ROT E.JOSEPH DEAN MARGARET HILLNOT0 OERSHAIM ooLostEIN JOHN H.scHwErrzER CHRISTINE L.DIcEEy THOMAS FLpAcIE RONALD 1,onossmANN PATRICK J.SIMt.soN MARK R.FEIcHTINGER splice K.pot EY - CHARLES H HABERNIO0 HUGH smiTH RANDOLpH 0,FosTER GUY A.F4ANDLes / , ROBERT F,HARRINGToN THOMAS B STOEL ANDREW R.oARDNER Lois 0.nosENDAUm JOHN R.HAy m AN LEY B,sTRAYER SUSAN p,ORABER STEVEN scR000iN RICHARD A.HAyoEN,JR, JERE M.wens DAVID W.OREEN JAMES RAY sTREINz . DAVID G.HATHURsT CLARENCE P.WICKS STEPHEN L.oRtrriTH THOMAS G.P.GIJILBERT ANN e,THOMpsON •`, ,., HENRY H,HEWITT MARCUS WOOD E.WAITER VAN VALKENsuRo CHARLES F.HINKLE WILLIAM W,WYSE . . City Recorder .. ,. City Council City of Tigard Tigard City Hall Tigard, OR 97223 Dear City Recorder and Members of the City Council: , . " . Re: Main Street Development Zone Change _Request, ZCPD 6-80 ........ ,. . , i ■ ' 'i This s to advise you that we are legal counsel for Main Street Development, Ltd. , J. B. Bishop and Herm Buchholz, . , the owners and developers of approximately 11.5 acre parcel of property located on the south end of Main Street in • , Tigard. This property was the subject of Zone Change No. ZCPD 6-80, which was heard by the Planning Commission on • April 22 , 1980. On that date, the Planning Commission denied "Main, . our request for a zone change from C-3M s.M Street"Main Commer- cial to C-3M2D Main Street Commercial Plan Development District. " Pursuant to Chapter 18. 56 and 18. 92 of the Zoning ••---, Code of the City of Tigard, we hereby appeal the decision of ( the Planning Commission to the City Council. This letter constitutes our notice of appeal and request for a hearing by the City Council on this matter. The reasons for this appeal are as folloWs: 1. The Planning Commission failed to apply the standards set forth in Chapter 18. 56, specifically Section 18. 56. 020 (b) . That section provides : "SUCh action shall be based upon the Comprehensive Plan, the standards of this title1 and othet regulations and the suitability of the proposed develop- ., . . ment ih relation to the character of the , • area. A SToEL,RIVES,BOLEY,FIZASER Ai D WYSE Tigard City Recorder Tigard City Council May 1, 1980 Page 2 Instead of applying these standards, the Planning Commission applied policies which have not been adopted by the, City Council and have no legal force or effect. 2. The Planning Commission failed to properly follow the requirements of Section 18 . 56. 020 in that the review • requested was for preliminary development approval, and this review is limited to the acceptability of the land uses pro- posed and their relationships. The Planning Commission went on to consider other factors which are riot appropriate at • the time of preliminary development approval as a basis for their denial. 3. The Planning Commission failed to adopt any . . 4 findings of fact. 4. The decision of the Planning Commission supported by substantial and reliable evidence, and was no evidence in confliCt with that submitted by ti applicant on the standards which are set forth in Sect 18. 56. 020. 5. The decision of the Planning Commission i8 in violation of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Tigavdi the transportation plan and policies adopted by the City • CoUndil, and the NPO No. 1 plan. For the above reasons, we respectfully request a • hearing before the City Council to review the Planning Commission' s decision. Because of the size of this proposed development and its significance to Tigard, we anticipate that the hearing may require more time than other comparable requests, In addition, we anticipate a substantial amount of citizen testimony. Therefore, We would appreciate it if an appropriate amount of time can be reserved for this hearing. Please send all communicationS regarding this matter to our offices. If you have any questionS, please do not hesitate to call me. 00, 440111p Very t , ep.e da5M 8TJ:gb cc: Mr. a. B. Bishop 1011 Mr. Hetm Buchholz . A -Au ( 4) • MAINSTREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD. RECEIVE"-, Suite 303 10505 SW Barbur Blvd. MAY 1 1980 Portland, OR 97219 0N OF TIGARD Tigard City Council c/o City of Tigard • Tigard City Hall ' • Tigard, OR 97223 • Dear Mayor Mickelson and Members of the City Council: RE: Appeal of MAINSTREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD. ' S denial of a Zone Change Request MAINSTREET DEVELOPMENT) LTD. is an Oregon Limited Partner- " ship, made up of JB Bishop and the Buchholz family, formed • in 1978 for the Specific purpose of developing the Buchholz property and any adjoining properties as needed and which might become available for long-term investment . • Our development proposal is a culmination of planning extending back seven years, initially by the Buchholz family and now involving another Tigard native, The pro- . posed final size and type of development is designed specifically to accomodate the numerous historic and present concerns of many, including: landowners, local residents and downtown merchants and property owners, past, and present • City of Tigard elected and staff officials, MPO #1, the Park Board, the State Highway Department, and the applicants have keyed from various in-put from the above bodies which has lead to the sites final configuration and specific site plan. We ask that you consider our request for a hearing, per the attached letter from the City of Tigard, dated April 29, 1980, and Upon reflection of a letter dated May 1, 1980, directed to the City Council from our legal counsel, Steve Janik, Mrs, Doris Hartig, has informed us that there are ample openings On the scheduled May 19) 1980) meeting agenda to alloW this request, We respectfully desire to be placed on that docket or at any subsequent meetings that will meet With your approval. I • * 1 . .. . •. . . , . , .. ..„.„. ; .. . , . . , ( ) . . ( . . ■ ',,,,,. • ,_,..,' ?'. . . .., . , P age Two Tigard. City.'COuncil , . . ,„ . • • :1 , . . • . • .I.. Sincerely, . . . , L , • .. ...; MAINSTREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD (7 1 ,i . • . ' . . . . 1' . .. . I , . . ......, • . .. Herm J. Buchho z JB Bishop General Partner General Partner • 1, :.',..... ,• ::•, 1 •; ., JBB:ot •. . . . . cc: Tigard City Manager • . . : ,. , Tigard City Recorder .. • City of Tigard Legal Council., Joe Bailey Steve Janik . . . . . . , .. . . . . • . , . . . . ,.• • • . , I „ ... i . •,.' 4,4 ' . ...•.'•.,.(4..k . , . I • I', • , '.. • , . . • . . .' ' • f! . . • . .. . I., ' . . t. . . • I.'l' . 4 . ' •'' . . f' , . . . . . , •. -.,4,—•,,,. ' , . . . , ... • . .41•'.. •'!' •I' i 1 n 1 • f . ••" • ., • , •. . — , • .",..,' . , • . , . ' , . • • .. '.. ' •''''''"''..''''''''''.'4"—•'•.."--"2•';4•1...2:•'-',••,• ••:".•'•••..,4::—',••:,74•4.',..'.•••:4'.',%'4 ,•.":„..,4.•'...„,,.".....,,, ,_:.,,,.__•,.,,..,',,,,,,,,',.;,,,,_„...,•, ,,,,,, „,„,,,•,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,, , •,1 • ,,,.. — ., • . .,._... f r fy, . i' ME l0 1DUM 1.1, • April 30, 1980 , tr TO: Aldie Howard r', Chef of Police FROM: SUBJECT: Miscellaneous i Aldie Street �e ie ed the fire department's letter regarding the Main ry , i Y. this gn itent Y plan at Johnson Street, and the proposed develop- merit at this location. , ar It appears to be.a. desirable plan that will resolve a critical • traffic circulation problem present at this time. 1 ,4 !'Considerable criticism will be forthcoming from Ash • Street arearelative to opening up Ash Street to Burnham. 4 y • ; i .B. Adams Chief of Police Rt3A t at r • A t,tin ,rwC9=�4r7'� ,,, ti • „• "1!;,-,,-;' r <11 • 67„../ ` t. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1k 1' k 3t. John A. Butler 9760 S.W. Omara Tigard, OR 97223 • City of Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Hall Tigard, OR 97223 is Dear Sirs, As a Tigard area resident, I wish to give a few personal opinions on. the J.B. Bishop/Buchholz South Main Street develop- ment. Bases for these opinions comes from study of the NPO #1 Plan, conversations with city staff, study of the development plan, and personal observations of Tigard as it is today. I believe this type development will be of economic benefit to the city of Tigard. It will provide an increased tax base, provide additional revenue for the cityi and create many new jobs for the area However, there are also a few problems that this 4. development will create. As with the Payless/Albertson/McDonald' s development, I believe that this development will be intense traffic generator] however, unlike the former development which has five ingress/egresssp the South Main Street development only pro7?oses two. Eventhough they are to be signaled, I personally believe that traffic flow will still be a problem unless another ingress/egress is created. It seems logical for any additional ingress/egress point to be from the rear end of the development to Ash Avenue. The city � . and developer with the aid of more traffic studies, if necessary, should determi A a portion of the traffic that would go through the Ash Avenue neighborhood would use the extensien. The extension would also help emergency vehicles access to the area and a properly planned extension could provide access and parking for the newly planned greenWay park. give the preceding not as an expert planer or traffic expert but only as a resident with concerns and from personal observation of Main Street during rush hour. These are only my personal opinions. I would appreciate this letter being entered into the written record concerning this development. Respectfully, Al& -/2 j John A. Butler 9760 S.W. Omara Tigard, OR 97223 2k April. 1980 Ali, murd Tiga ,� Planning Staff Tigard City Hall Tigard, OR 97223 Reguarding: 30 April 1980 Special Meeting • Dear Mr. Howard, I wish to submit my written opinions on thei.ssu6s you raised in your letter of invitation for the 30 April 1980 meeting. In your letter you mentioned the G. I. Joes/Waremart complex, a Tri--Met station on Commercial, the civic center/ library complex, the greenway park, and future traffic circ- ulation(specifically the extensions of Ash Avenue and John- son Street). All these issues, x believe, are interrelated and must be considered together. The last Planning Commission meeting demonstrated the impact of the G. 1. Joes/Waremart deve]°opment on traffic. This complex would be a real traffic generator and the Planning Commission recognized the traffic problem associated with it. There seems to be a definite need to extend Johnson Street, at least from the rear of the development, through to Ash Avenue. Further traffic studies would probably beat this fact out. To lessen the impact of the extension of Johnson into the local neighborhood, it seems logical to extend Ash Avenue through to, at least, Burnham. This extension could also serve as a park access and as a parking area for park and city visitors; however, it does seem appropreate to make these decisions in as short as time as possible in all fairness to area developers. Tri-Met's proposal for a transit station on Commercial is a good idea; however, it Was mentioned that their plans Would be upset if Ash Avenue carries through to Commercial from Burnham: The benefits should be Weighed between the two proposals and a determination made on which would suit wvn .r..n ' ww4iY'+w..+..�Yl Ll''1�•r:;J1r.N.e.... .+.,_._.....,......ma ..:Y:waMcx.N.+,i u+uuxra• .Y»yt' Y...:. ti . .,_.:.:«:.....,...:,,:-„.;:.. c,....„..:,._.._....mod.:...............:...:.:.....,.._._:.-:_-..-:....M....:.w ..,._...+..-.... • • :........ ....._:.:,......:_............._.....r.....:.,_.......:. w ....:»,-.,.-:....,:....,......'...-.,rte.-:.,,::s....m:.:M }} ,e .',,,-'1: '1 s)... , (r)” . ( ) [I r i, i , , l'I' ',"'l • Tigard' s best long teran interests. k :. Lastly, I 'd like to mention the greenway park and the ;, civic center/ library complex. I feel. these .l items are a '7: priority; especially, the library since a building fund has I' been: started for it. Also the greenway park planner has submitted possible plans for the park that list possible sites ; for the clv `'c center complex. These plans should, all be coordinated together, In conclusioP I realize that financing all these pro-- jects is a real pro\Plem; however, I believe most important is for a plan to exist` that: proclaims to all developers, �, .' ” busiinesses, aid residents, "This plan is thewgoal . . Once y deny q4 ' finalized it Will be hard for an one to change it or den it exists. Obliviously some federal or state funds may be avail-- able to get the plan rolling; otherwise, the costs must be 1 • borne by the city, its residents, its businesses, and the a•' developers. :ho wish to impact the areaThe main idea to keep in mind. is to take the area residents really want the plan and no'; to merely make them just accept it. I commend the Planning Staff for realizing the importance • and interrelation of all these issues and hope it succeeds in ' • the fo1�u elation of a Downtown Tigard Master Plat. Please, put this letter With the other input from your special meeting. Thank you. • Respectfully, iSio, ,, P • , it ,, i 1 f' A 4 i q i3 It it i 4 r 4 4.7 CITYOF TIC WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON April 29, 1980 MAIN STREET DEVELOP NT, LTD. 10505 SW Barbur Blvd., Suite 303 Portland, Oregon 97219 REFERENCE ZONE "CH Nt `PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 6-80 Dear Sir: Please be advised that the Tigard Planning CoMmi3Siot, at their meeting of b April 22, 1980, denied your request for a Zone Change Planned Development District in reference to the above project. Thts proposal was denied due to an inadequate design of access to Highway 99 ' and the tie-in to Main Street, and an unsettled floodp1ain-greenbelt question. Action of the Planning Commission is final unless notification of appeal to the City Council is filed with the City Recorder within twenty (20) days of ' the Planning Com iss on's action. If office we can be of 63 f any gfl further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact Sind ly. Al 0� ward: 'Planning Director A.HV.mc • • 1240 S,W, MAIN P,O, BOX 2 397 TIGARb, OiREGON 97225 PH 63 -411 . i .. . . .,,. .• • , I ‘• • . ' . ,.. : . * .. i (I- . C 4... , . ,' ' TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING ' April 22, 1980 - Agenda Item 5.5 - J. B. Bishop/G.I. (Toes '--. . Fowler Junior High School • Lecture Room • .. 10865 S.W. Walnut Street ' Tigard, Oregon . , ' . present for this hearing: Commission: President Tepodino, Commissioners Bonn, Funk, Helmer, Herron, Kolleas, Popp, Smith, Speaker ,.. .41,.. Staff: Howard, Currie •. . . (Note: Before openit,g the public hearing on this request, President Tepedino asked those who were going to testify to move to the first ..1 , two rows, and to limit tiestimony to no more than four minutes if possible, because of the apparent number of people wishing to speak o The meeting Was held in the Lecture Room rather than in the Double Math room as advertised.) . 0 "" .. .° . . . Tepedino: I call for item 5.,, please. May I have the staff report and recommendatior, ,/ , ” ' (Note: Howard cjuestioned commissioners on their receipt of certain data, some of which had just been passed out to them . • by the applicant, to be sure that all had all the pertinent data.) Tepedino: As a general comment before we open this issue, let me express my concern as the president of th,..te commission that the applicants , have a responsibility not only to themselves and the Planning Commission, but the city staff and the city itself, to come J forward with a complete package. Itls more than burdensome..- think it is rather Uncommon, to be running up and down here handing out information. 1 dontt know whose fault it is--I an not interested in finding out; but to ask the Oommission to :„. sit and contemplate a decision which may have far-reaching impact on the city Of Tigard on information that is honded out just two seconds before we begin, I think is something that we , . ought to 41eri9usly consider as to whether We Want to even go forward With the entire package. I would be willing tO sit here and listen to the applicant and give him the right to A public hearing, but I think it is unfortunate that what 1 think is happening has happened. $!?eakerr.. Mr. Presidentj in that connection I would like to eXpre50 SOM. . conderts. In thin!-.rt.ng about this and studying the VolumfneUs Material that was giVen to us, it occurs to mo that this/guch More important than the development of eleven acres, or whatever the acreage is its much more important than just the anchoring Of one end of Main $treet. I think it transcends the wisho of Neighborhood Planning organitation #1. Really, I think the viability of doWntown Tigard as a commercial area is going to be • determined for the next 30 or 60 or 80 years by what development , -... . takes place on this property, and I at particularly concerned . . .:4 .1.. 4 . , b' ■ •) ' , TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING COMM' SSION HEARING J. B. BishOp/G.I. Goes APtil 22, 1960 Speaker: with the transportation plan--the cohtinuation of some sort of (Cont.) access from JohhSon Street through to at least to Ash, and the continuation of Ash Street 0 • . (conclusion of temarko lost in change of tape). Note: HoWard then read the staff Report and Redommehdations, and al. pages of "Staff Narrative Relative to this Proposal° for agenda item 5.5, which was advertised as follows: 4 , 5.5 ZONE CHANGE PLANNIID DEVPLOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 6-80 ; • (a. B. Bishop/G.I. Joes) NPO #1 • . A request by tY4 Be Bishop and H. J. BUchholz of Main Street deve1opnont, Ltd. for a Zone Change from C-3M "Main Street Commercial° to C-.3M-PD °Main Street Commercial Planned Development District° Zone for approximately 1.1. 1 acres located on the southern end of Main Street (Wash* Co. Tax Map 281 2A0, Tax Lets 1600, 1500, 2200, 1400, 1300, 1200 and a portion of 200 . Parcel #3). The if Report is attached, marked lbchibit A. Tepodiho: Okay, thank yoU, staff. May I have the applicahtis presentation? Jahik: Good eveuing, tetbete of the Planning Commistion, and. Mro Chairtan. My nate is Stephen Jahik, and I at a lawyer reprei- sentiAg the applant, and I will try to do what lawyers don't • often do very well, and that is to be brief. This is clearly a Maier issue for your cominuntty. It is being Propobed—ihOt by oUtsiders, but by members of your community--the Bishop • family and tUdhhOlz family, who have bean here for a number of years. Because it is a significant issue, we have had to in Order to do our job, assetble a vast array of exert s and consUltahts, and all of the thibgs that ge with aftalYziug this . : thihg• In. fact, one of the issues tohight coUld be whether we it have dote enough of that, and whether we have epeht enough rdw wdrad indidtitidt) ahalYte the traffic problems. *Oa _ (a I hope Fou dotOt tind it araleceebrily tedious) but we do want to do our Job) and teat of our presentation Will be conducted by the eXperts ih various fields, We ate sorry, Mt. Chairman, that wo gave yoa a letter tonight, We pr. !ev tot to do that The teadon for that is quite simple: wii given the staff's tepott late Vriday atternooti which we raided a number of iesUee. We did our best. given the faCt that We had 44i , a , time 4„. 4 _1 A4 ,,tt„'0 get - ha- w-ree 'aysi e 0.aft, -110.11--n6 - Wee-011d) to g 1,00pbh01,V6 letter front the State Department Of Transportation addteesite our donder-d. Olearly had we been given more of opportanity to respotd to tho00 dehderne, we would have dote in 000ftero ,50 we apologize for being in that pOsition. nizasomasza,— tat , _ - • . ' • TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING -MISSION HEARING 4 J. B. Bishop/G.I. Joes April 22, 1980 • Tepodino: Mr. Janik, are you talking about only one letter? We got about four .0- Howard: We have other letters to read. Tepedino: (Continuing) And a floodplain analysis, a letter from Mr. Johnson, and a letter from Mr. Hight, and we got a letter from Mt. Buchholz and Bishop and a letter from Mr. Geibel. Jatik: x want to correct the record that we are not . . (a few words lost). While this is a significant project for Tigard, I think it is very iMpertant to focus on what the decision is before ••••• you. That decision is a zone change from 0-3M, which is the correct zoning of the property, to C-3MPD. It is not an issue • which involves the uses. All of the uses that are being sought in this project are uses which are in conformance with its current zoning as well as the future zoning, The only reason that we are dealing with this is because of the fact that some portion of this site is what yoU have defined as sensitive lands, and therefore under your ordinances it requires a change to a PD designation. Now becallse of the fact that is precisely the issue that is before us, we are not asking for a substantial degree of • change. Nevertheless this obviously raises issues in your own 2 minds about what this poses for the future of downtown Tigard, as quite properly it should. The nature of this project is one that has been attioipatedi t think, by Your comprehensive plan. It is designed to anchor, as your staff has itdicated, the retail component of this section of downtown. This project has been years and yeats and years in coming* 1 think it is fair to taY it started about seven Years ago with an initial study by somo planners. Five years ago the applicants were told that the city had some thoughts about building a civic center, and We heat that echoed again tonight in the statflo report. give years ago we took the property off the market for over a year and a half, to wait and see what the city would de With respect to its civic Center. Nothing happened; Having kept it off the market for a year and a half, it is now again a surprise to us, having gone forward and trying to put a project together which cohforms to your compre- hensive plan, that we are tow told by the staff th&t there are big things in the works, therefore we must wait again. 101i6 Parts of our disphte, X think, With Staff tends to be the Issue o± transportation. To put the Matter very simPlY, the staff. had said te hs, oNe, the ettatt, believe that TigatOs doWnteWn is best served by realigtitg Johtsot Street) connecting it through to and improving Ash treetilt The thing that i.e surprising aboUt that is that every time thal', issue has •••A dr. JIM •• • TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING COMMISSION HARING J B. Bishop/G.I. Joes April 22, 1980 • Jahik: come up to the people who make the decisions in this comMunity (Cont.) the City Council members, the members of this Planning Commission --that proposition has beet rejected. It's very difficylt When a city adopts a comprehensive plan, coMprehensivo transPertation plan, which is then held out to the public as the policies of that coMmutity.-te try to conform to those policies as this request doe -only to be told, even though your comprehensive • plan, your transportation plan den't provide for this improve meat of Johnson and Ash.-nevertheless because the staff thinks that's supetior to what the City Council has adopted, you must nevertheless conterM to the staff positiOn. We tried to develop a plan that precisely conforms to what this city has adopted as its policies* It's a plan that has been approved by your NPO #1, and I am surprised to hear tonight some criticism of 100 #16 thinking about this,. In additiot to that I think you will fitd substantial support amo yeur downtown merchants. The question has been raised as to whether the. Oregon Depattment of Transportation has approved this. The fact of the matter is .m-4 Yes, in several letters that are part of your file, and moot recently in the letter submitted tonight. Nevertheless Staff has said We mUst go back and got approval of the Oregon Department of Transportation. The problem from staff's point of view is that yoU have been given that approval, and that aPProval ia not consistent with the staff's view of the 'ealign. moat of the Streets. Theta has been some cetcert it the staff eport about the ptetec-, tiot of ()pet space. Our plan clearly shoWei a substantial amount of open space as a buffer to propetties adjoining Us. It really ought not to be any concern about whether that open space is pteserVed, because WO have agreed to dedicate to the city-oi. • s . gave A contribution for the eity. •. We OPOht ,OVet• a year atd a half it teetitgs With the otatt, and it Wasn't until October, 1579, When we first head about thr tact that atatt would not approve this without or cetsidering and modifying all of our plans to accOMmodate the realignment of Johnson and the ektension of Aah. It is Very, Very ditfichlt to putt together a project of this iMPOrtdhed and Site for the benefit of 3-.gard when We haVe to deal With these kinds Of ohatgo4 . , Now I think the iastlea that are betere you tonightii-iand I think it is my job as a lawyer (and this is probably my only geed Unction to try to focu s thebe: We ate asking tor a tone ohange, the 414,andarda being, do Vie conform to your compre-, • hotsive plat? If w6 aohit CottotM in our request to your CoMpre. • hdnbivo plant, than t think the Planning Commissiot has to aay whYk What oomptohehaive plat elometts 4o we not conform tel '• • , • '1 D5, TRANSCRIPT or PLANNING-UOMMIssiorr HEARING - J, Bs Bishop/G.I0 Joes April 22, 1980 Janik: The second req,uironient is that we conform to the state-owide land (Cont.) use goals' Those goals that I think are impacted here are the • goals to reserve open space..awhich we have agreed to dedicate.— and the obvious goal of having a safe, efficient transportation systomo That goal will be addressed by oUr transportation , ., exportsq Now the staff report raises a number of issues that I would like to respond to in a summary way, I think i would like to direct attention to page 3 of the staff report, l'irst, the staff again has . the Planning Director. and the Public Works Director 4 � have repeatedly asked for Johnson Street to be continued through this development to eventually connect With Ash Street, The prob1ern that that puts us in is the followings While the staff can make recommendations aad we don't dieagree with their opportunity to do eo--the City Council has made decisions which give a clear ihd cation that that is not going to occur. If we ' were to redesign this entire project (it would be Unfeasible) by the extension of Ash and the Continuation of Johrieon, and then cone before the City Council, we would be told that that con- flicted with the adopted policies of the City Council. ObviOusl.y it doesn't make ser`Lse. The issue has boon raised as to whether We have control of property that is included ih our site that's owned by 'Vlestorn Oregon Marino. The answer is that while they do have a lease- .' ' ` hold interest, We have reached ail oral understanding With them '` giving us the right to utilize their property, and we are awaiting draft documents from their attorney* The issue has been raised aS to whether we have the right to ` rtiliZe certain property that Oregon Department of Transpottation will own. The answer to that as we have sat forth in our letters, is that property has in principle by ODOT been confirmed to to eutplts.s, and that we are currently negotiating a lease with them to obtain the right to use that property, as diet igutehed from having that property Sold under a competitive bid and whore someone ease night acquire it. The staff soya that our traffic analysis only' Considered our relation to 99W, rind could not ,obese the larger impact ,tea r One point I would like to trnderocaro there is that when you lidton to our traffic ocpert, pay particular note to jtxet how many additional streets. chat larger arediiaWe did In fact addreea. 1 o did oonaider what in oitr experts' opinion wore the impacte on mtrooto other than 99W. 0Ale next content its that the staff indicates we have diacudsed the airy complex idea with the City council and coneultanta, ,.,;a +The poesi' .ity of a civic aomile on Ash avenue artd the possi- liility of the O114 dark proposals could sign . icant y change this: 4.56. i N ,.iMw,rv.,,. 4rtiM1.YrI?/Jw tIM1 M1IIS""•", i., .... .... ..'C..« ..n4.tW:y.,w ra d ♦..«u- +.,u..... ....... { -.. ..i.., i .,n . i,...i. ..v. 40 * TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING J. Bishop/G.I. j0e8 April 22, 1980 Janik: entire development.o I don't live in. Tigard, 4o I don't knoW (Cont,) how long You have been discussing those things* Each of you know that those proposals have been agitated for years and years. It would be, I think, unfeasible to how conclude that because tho idea of a civic complex-.which has not been accepted for this site—has how been raised by the staff -- should be any basis or rejecting this. There is no funding for the civic complex, no definitive plans -0- nothings Nothing concrete. The staff then Suggests that we return to the Planning CoMmis- . Pion only when we hAVe a transportation Study that has been aPPrOved by the staff. Again I ask you, how Much sense does it make for us to try to live under the adopted policies of the City Council, which precludes the very thing the staff is telling A Us they want us to to and come back with? Obviously it's a very difficult box to be placed in. Well again I think / will sit down and let some Of the experts deal with the other matters, People we will have epeak to YOu Will be Mr. POtter, who is an MAII appraiser, Who will talk to you about the economic effects of this on Tigard, our architect will come and tell you what it's going to look like, what it Will feel like in the community. We have all expert consultant who will be he to deal with the iSsues of drainage.. site improveMehte. Then we have our traffic analysts, Finally, think the oWhers of the property would like to say a few words. Agaih, we will try to be as succint ac possible, but We do Want to do What this commission expects and what the staff has requested, and that is a thoroUgh jObo Thank youo •,4 epedinot Mr. Janik, before yot retire for a moment: are you sUggesting that What you are hearing froM the staff is not what you would expect to hear from the City Council, and therefore you prefer not to incOrportAte the staffts recomtendatien ih your planning/ Janik: gd; what '000 are saying idi Until plans are adopted b the City CoUndil they dontt have the force of being this cotmunityts Will or what he law iOs We ate told by the law that we have to conform to the plans that we do adept, Thi,10 proposal pre.- cisely conforMs to year coMprehentive plan, yoUr Nro #1 plan, acid your transportation Plan, That transportation plan rejects what the stafi' id here telling what they want td to study and propose today: And therefore we donut think that what the staff is reCoMmehdihg has any foundation in the City counoll or in the exiSting plans or policies, .; Topedirld: I see. 60 what you aro suggesting is You think you are dOmply- # ihd with all the teqUiroffiehtij as they otand today? , 1 Janikt WO WdUldnit be taking up Your time it we didn't: .• . . . „ ,.. . : ,, _ r “ • „ . A ••• . ., „ .rr . • • r r r r• • • r I • . :"... „ V r 4 . iff Q7 . . ..' TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING COMMISSION REARING , . . . , . . J* B, BteheP/GilIs Jpes •, . , , April 22) 1980 . . . . , .., Tepedino: I take it really what you are suggesting is, regardless of what I . ,. the City Council makeup is today, or what their feelings are .-.., today, they are bound by the same rules, Is that right? I. am concerned, because suppose the Planning Commission feels the Same way that the staff does? Then why are we all sitting around here at a quarter after ten? The applicart takes his best shot with his best hook (?) , hoping that he hac met all the require.o ments, regardless of •perSonal feelings of various individuals or organizations Within the city s Is that right? t get the sense that you are looking more at what the City Council's • response would be than the Planning Commission or the Planning Staffs janik: Our view is very simp/es We look at wat the adopted plans are2 we look at that, and the law says we have to conforlit with its That's what wo are here doing. Tepodinot Okay' greats That's your opiniohs 1 appreciate it* Thank you. Are there other People wishing to speak in favor of this pro. pal? otter: Thank you, MY name is Dean Potter* I at a real estate appraiser and CensUltaht PreM VandoUver, Washihgtohs my function with Mr. Bishop and Mrs Buchholz was to analyze and advise as to the character and impact of the project on Tigard. I approach thin .I. ih part by attempting to understand the goals of Tigard in conforMahce with your comprehensive plans, your traffic plans, and the Xeighbothood Panning Orgahizatioh goals. 1 have also attempted to identify some lieetto of the City of Tigard and evalu. ate the projedt in the light of these needs* I will try to be as brief as possible, but one point I would like to make is / don't intend to stand in front of you and represent that Mr* .. Bishop and Mr. BuchholZ are pursuing the development of thiS property 40 a contribution solely to the community. Their , ihteht not only is as a contribution to the community, lout or profits Their goal i$ to create a planned deVeleptent of the Otthjeot property that WOUld tot only be profitable, but would I be of benefit tb the cOMmthity* , Attet analyzing the NPO goalS, the comprehensive plans and other documents apparently Adopted by the oity, I believ e thia deaign .. AO bbAdeitted MaXiMizes all these goals, My total evaluatioh thlEt pt.oject In its iMPadt 04 Tigard its positive ih hatute0 . I have aolodtod twelve poihts which I would like to cover very briefly4 he oeouomic impact on IVigatd will hopefully be sighifidahts . There WoUld be additiehai discretiotarY ihd0M00 We would anticipate approkimatoly 18g Jobe being doted solely by the p..tio3odti Meet of those Wold be EibbOha paycheck typo of jobs) . Where egiatiug lioaidonte of Tigard would poeeibly be employed, . , i.J.7. TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING 4 Be Biehop/G4I, Joe April Z2. 1980 Potter: rather than drawing from other areas in the drawing greater Portland (Cent«) areas The property will also be a significant taxpayer, It will have an anticipated $505 million value. This would produce direct revenues to the City of Tigard of approximately 13,520 per year, and a onewtiine parking assessment for systems development in the amount of 426,450', = It will also supply a third comparisone.shopp ng district in the City of Tigard. As we have discussed, the staff has emphasized, and we have discussed in our narrative to you, the project will anchor the south and of Hain Street and help to continue the vitality of downtown Tigard. It will further, in this same connection, replace existing buildings on the property which at the present time are in a dilapidated state, and will replace ,.r them with architecturally appealing structures. The project seems to be timely, inasmuch as current occupancy of commercial properties in the City of Tigard are high, and recentl.y..constructed :properties of a commercial nature have experienced reasonably rapid absorption in the recent pasta The two prime proposed retailers in the development already operate existing facilities in the greater Portland area. • They have identified Tigard as an area it which they would like to participate as far as your retail sales, because they find residents of Tigard shopping ih their facilit±e t elseVnhor: :#.n the greater Portland area. They would like to bring these retail twee :Cee closer to the r'eeidente of Tigard. The City of Tigard has been increasing in population at approx- innately 8 per cer.,t per annumm Thiel is anticipated in your inforir►ation I read regarding the City of Tigard through 1990. to view of the J t creased population, it further increases the 4. total area affoctod by an income, which increases the need for additional retail cointtieri ial faCilitieso The subject property t is de Sighed to ic.hteve this goal and fulfill this need. ; • At I road the Tigard econQnic development plan and comprehensive lan, 1 find that the project appears to be in concert with the information I .have read. One of the More important aspects is that the subject property n co •�, � ct pro ert is an c� tromely uni ue reaoyrr of the City of Tigard. Its a aignificantly large tract of land in close p 'oxirnity to the downtown area., It is certainly ►„ going to have an impact on the downtown area. The subject property e,a proposed appears to be in harmony with NPO 01 ' plati, and farther I see in the NP0 #1 repot of the meeting on , .� .., � .. y .. �U ..t p the � :A.pril �� 1.985i that the appear to ��.vor the dovelo mv�rt t. u hdo boon proposed for the south snd of Hain ►treat over the , t .,'" --, --■--- ____ _ _ _—,----,-,----- . . , . ., . , .•. , . I •:' • , . ■ t •4) LI , - . .,.,. . 'et ••■:.. - TRANSCRIPT Or PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING . 1 . . Jp Be Bishop/G.I. Joes . . 7 : Aril 22, 1980 . 0 ' *. . • Potter: Tigard Planning staff proposal for the realignment of Main . '„ (Cont.) Street, _ . :,.. And finally, the subject design is Such as to not encourage traffic traveling to the development to travel through eXisting , . residential districts, The project itself, the specific design) -, will preclude any adverse effect on adjacent residential areas, .. It is oriented to existitr, arterial streets, away from ream .. . dential neighborhoods; there will be abundant landscaping and . a donated bUffer area at the rear of the site. Eight accesse8 , currently existing on Main Street will be eliminated and be .t , 4 replaced with two accesses, The architectural design will be . aesthetically pleasing-.it will not be garish. This development is intended to be a lox 'term investment by existing and former . . • , . residents of Tigard, We will anticipate prudent maintenance . of the property both With respect to landscaping and the bUildings, I note in reading the NPO •#1 plan, the subject • $. project appears in conformance with a good number of TPO goals, • most specifically No, 22 which cites the towatown should , .. : , provide convenient shopping -- the subject development will , assist in this NE° goal; Policy No, 23 relative to the rode-. ve1opment of doWntown, and Policy No. 19 relative to clustered , parking. In summary, it's my view in veading your information and docu- mentation about your comprehensive plans, that the project is in conformance with the comprehensive plan, Tigardts goals, ,. ..., and the NPO #1 plan, It will represent an anchor at the south end of Main troot and minimize impact on adjacent residential areas by orienting traffic down to the Main Street area away from existing neighborhoods, That was how brief I was. Do . i you have any questions, sir? . . ., . Tepedinot Not now, Thank you, Other applicants representatives? , ,.... Itehlet My tame is David ItehIo, offices in Seattle, 1932 rirst Avenue, if and I am the project architect in coordination of mite develop. • , ment for Got, acleis and am doing the design development (-.)I.., Waromart and overall coordination on the site, One thing 1 would like to do .. we have the overhead projector .. . it would be more benefiCial to look at a larger siZe site plah than you hav e. in front of you and maybe for the pablic, 4! (flute; There Was a little byriplay between Mr. Xehle and , President Tepedino, whose interest was keeping it briefo The opaque projector was not made to Work, so architectural renderings were presented insteade) . ..... .4904 4 p .. . . i ... , ,.. n.-... - • ., „I . . . • dIMMMIN■,■11•111111• . . Vb ..'' e''' ..- , . 4 . " . _ ., 6,f TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNINGA,AdviISSION HEARING ,....,,„, .. , , - j. E. BIsImptri,I.joos April 22 1980 . . _ — .... .. , Kehl*: Basically* the design ParaMeters for the project were Fanno Creek, . •,,'. the proposed park:, the greenbelt that goes along the back of our , property, traffic flow in and, Around the site, as well as our . ' . ,. tenants° requirements and needs for the facilitYs This is a , , .. , rendered site plan of the project with proposed internal parking .. . . area and building configuration. One of the things that we have • been trying to do is to try and mihimize the iMpact of some . . , large buildings, large faCilitiess on the site as Well as the Surrounding areas. , . Under the C.-3M zohihg$ as Aldie has mentioned, as the staff • report has MehtiOned, they are permitted uses in the C...3 zohe. We are aprtexitately 25 per cent site coverage ratio under the underlying toning' as Ci-3M4 there is actually no maximum lot . . coverage requirements. We comply with the building setbacks . ',', required by the Cr3H zone. In fact We have exceeded it in several areas* The 10 foot ft0ht yard, the 5 feet side yards ,.. . . are very Well established, and we are trying to buffer the . iMpaot of the Parking areas, the itpacts„Or_tho*,,,bajIdillgoon.i, • figuratiohs fro triblitaries sOuth, Main Streets the Fahho Creek Parkway, and the residential areas aroand. We have A Parkihg ratio of one to 278 .0..-. ohe parking stall for every 218 .' •. , square feet. The building code reqUires one te 400. . One of th3 main concerns that we had Was the large impact Or the building. We have some Of the split betWeen the WaraMart • . p , . and the 0.1. aoe4s. We tave allowed..—We are allowed, exeUse me--.35 root height ntaxinniin in the tones and eat maximum structure _ ,.. , is going to be 24 foot high, to try and MihiMiZe tho mAdOlVegio p.,. hods Of the stractUres and Also by ? :? ? we are trying to eliminate that massiveness Again, whereas Oho building would , . ., be the titegi aa large As tWo Sme0,1er bUildinga. , . . , 1:ehe tratfie oirehlatiOn, internal—.4e have litited oat access points and egress po:oltb to two poihts.....Ohe on 994 And one on , . .., Math Street. OUr traffic consultant wi)1 discuss the internal ,. .,. MoVeMehts4 external meVemeht00 onto sites Off the site, and no Of the things t Weald like to point out is that in our SOteteb WO have analyzed and tried te dote up With a Sehete that Weald lessen the impact 04 Johnson 8tredt. AOhoe we have only put iv' a right..oht..OhlY on eat. northern °kits as Well as to ..,. ' plan two:ihtethal and one e.tcteiihal right turn to try and lessen , , the iMpaCt bil atIhnSoh teeth totoihg people eilt onto the Pacific ! .1. RighWAY notch, at tho oduthoth, thd* , t.here Aro two phases to the projeet.i.the initial projeeti.i. • ihdlUding G . toe and a Watemarti Shop , tebtaUtatto to be eetPleted in thd summer Of 15181t and the bang to be oomploted ): 6011167 tljta-tletto in 198l. 4 '" 6 ' 1 . 4 ".1 TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING J. B• Eishop/G0I, *Toes April aa, 1980 Keele: The lighting system we are going to use is internallY directed (Cont,,) We use a non-glare e ? outside fixture, which basically it eliminates overspreY and elareo All parking lot lightiug will be directed internal to try and minimize that over spray, Tri-Met--one of the comments in the staff report was on Tri TrleeMet will have no reason, nor do they want to really enter ; oUr site, because it would break up their traffic flow and break up their stops(' And presently there is A Tri-Met station in front of the library--that would be adjacent to the site—. and would handle that Tri-Met question. We have tried to really impact the area with landscapingi. trying to buffer the project and park and bikbuay and pathway, Also trying to establish as much landscaping as we can to try to buffer the project from Main Street and Righway 990 We have also broken up the sea of asphalt by the elitination of parking stalls, and putting landscaptag in the islands as required by the design review, which was suggested 70 feet on center, and ours are actually 60 feet on center; and 9 feet in width, whereas the design review requires 8 feet, So what we are trying to do is to really give you more than under the design review, giving you an anchor to Main Street and solving some of the traffic congestion on johneen Street, which will be addreesed to you by the traffic consultant, At this time I would liko to introduce Lew Gilhat of G010 Joele, He is their architect, front Williams and. Gilham. They have a • rendering Of their proposed facility, • 6 (BUsiness of die- , • PlaYing rendering•) Gilhat: I am Lewis Gilham, Williams and Gilham, Arehitects0 We are the architects for the G•I, Joe's project. I at sure I can keep this within the feur wieUte time limit, • G.I. joofb will occupy the southerly portion of the site* We Will hate 55 thousand square feet of retail space, and aPProXi. MatelY 4500 feet of enclosed but not roofed garden space. All of our services Will be in the rear of the buildihg, We Will halm our direct parking graded with the rest of the ehopping center, and the landscaPing, Of doUrse, will else be included. ) The exterior design will be compatible with the rest of the project* We are using concrete WadotZ7 construction capped with a softening Wood facia and * a 4 4 (balance of hie Presentation lobt in change of tapes.) Janik: . 4 a (He listed experte who were present bUt would not be Called in the ihterOsts of tiie a * discuss technical engineering dine and hydrologY, and Ge6tge ottehi our landscape rth • ee TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING Je B. Bishop/G.I. Joes , , April 22, 1980 • .0 Janik: architect; and I think we shall go right to the traffic consultant, (Conte) CH2Me-Hi11, Mr. Bob Allen. Hobson: My name is Dean Hobson. I represent CH2M-1i1l in Portland, „ and we are the traffic consultants for this project. • We were engaged in. March, 1979. to perform a transportation analysis, and we considered the proposed land use for the site and some written comments from the city dated December 27, 1978, and ODOT written questions about the project dated December 22, 1978. Oer work was to be compatible with the adopted city plans and policies, and with the objectives and plans of ODOT's Transportation Systems Management Plan for Tigard on Highway eeWe We performed a comprehensive traffic analysis of oxisting projected weekday, peak hour, and off—peak hour conditions, including traffic impact through the Main Street Development project. For the existing and 1985 normal growth volumes on • Pacific Highway and approaches to the Math Street intersections , at johnson and Greenburg, we used ODOTIs volume characteristics • that were developed for the Tigard TSM project, since they were obviously acceptable to ODOT and the city. We supplemented this data with traffic volume counts along Main Street. Our traffic analysis included estimates of Weekday and peak hour trips generated by the project's land use. Assignment of these tripe to the principal impacted street systems included Pacific Highway, Math Street, Johnson, Greenburg; and we also prepared an evaluation of the impact of the site. generated traffic on the principal street systems' operational characteristics. This impact analYsite included determination of intersection capacity, signal system warrants, signal system progressive movements, Poteetial conceptUal design or the Main.Johnson—Pacific HighWay West intersection, and design of alternative site access plans. A detailed Preliminary epert was provided to the city and state in May, 1979. At a Meeting in June, 1979, additional concerns -76ther than those identified in city and ODOT letters or bob uww to 6 em eki 1978, were disc soed. e ere asked t addtes • these dOncerna in a sUppleMental analysis. A doMprehensive report covering these analyses Wee SUbmitted in June, 1979, d it also incorporated a supplemental analysis and the MaY an report, so the second report Was Made at that time. FolloWing the review and discussion of the t'1ay and aune, 1979, repOrtt, ODOT and the city requested that some further additional con deriab be analyzed along With the proposed reViaion that had occurred in proposed site land use plans due to the lengthy delay involved,. A second sUpplemental report *as submitted in 4.124w , _ --- . . . • , . . . , ‘,. . ... , „ . , . .. . , • " 0 ,' ':, (-7"` ,-- 4'' , ,. . ,, TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING COMMISSION REARING . , , . • J. B. Bishop/G.I. Joes , April 22 1980 . . . Hobson: September, 19793 which addressed the above items. You can see (Cont.) we generated some data here. A request from the city was received in October, 1979, to prepare 'i., additional analyses of the potential diversion of site-generated . ,., traffic to new street systems--additions...that might be iMple \ \ • mented by the city at some future date. These are the street . , . \ . systems that we were referring to--extension of Johnson, Main • , A Street and Ash Street..-so it was October, 1979, before we received requests to analyze these additions. A brief report . • covering this request was submitted in October, 1979, indicating our estimate of potential traffic changes, and for this we used Carl Butke's December, 1973 report on traffic circulation-.- • that#s for Ash Avenue...Downtown Plan, his basis background data. This analysis does include traffic estimates of project impact on Ash and other streets surrounding the site. That was his . brief document here that was submitted. A major change from site land use was proposed by our client in March, 1980. A detailed report on the traffic analysis on this currentlY-proposed project land uSe plan Was submitted in March, 1980, and this is the report for that. , I don't propOse to go into the details of the comprensive data methodology traffic flow characteristics, intersection capacitie0, and so on, since they are fully documented in these fire reports that have been submitted to you, Howevtr X would like to briefly sUmmarize the basil findings of our nalYsos. We feel that : .',, • tranSportation analyses have been comprehensive, impartial, within the site development parameters established by our client, and perfcrmed in accordance with accepted traffic engineering operational procedures. ConStrhotion of the site development . , will haVe a measuVable traffic impact on adjacent street systeMs, We have identified thee by impacts in the respective reports. .. . % We feel that threugh cooperative efforts of ODOT, the city and our client in the final design we reconnended site access improvement, that those impaCts will be minimized, and that efficient, safe traffic floW and circulation can be Provided,* All ttu,;,, Specific recommendations are presented for consideration relative to the desirable aOtiOh Upon development of the Site: . _. ,. First, tall access should bo provided at Pacific Highway access poiftts, and limited excess (which means rio left ttrns out of the site towards Pacific HighWay) sheUld be provided at Main 8treet interSeCtion. Sedond, the Pacific Highway access should be signalized, and this Signal shotld be interconnected into the . Pacific Highway comPUterized traffic control sYstem being installed bY ODOT as part 1,,, the Tigard TS M Project. This signal . is warranted not only because of the Additional, traffic genera- tion on the site due to the addition of Waretart, but lsO becaUse • • .13... ,1 . 0 '• _ — ...,,,,---;—.4-4.-.,,,,...„-,...,...,,,,,;,,,,,..,„„,...„.„ .,,,...„, „...„..„,„,,...„...,, ,„.........-,.. „,..„.....-,.. ,,,,,,,,,„•...:-= -..-k .,..• , , . . 0 , . , . . • . .. , 7 , _ . . ... ... * , . ‘ , . TRANSCRIPT or PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING '. J. B. Bishop/G.I. Joes • April 22, 1980 . . . . . . Hobson: of the restricted left turn movement at Main Street access point (Cont.) going toward Johnsen. That required that all that traffic go .. out at the Highway 99 access point. .. ..7 1 A third point I want to make is that the basic geometric design H concepts shown ih out MarCh, 1980, report from Pacific' HighWay . . West/Main Street/Johnson Street intersection should be adopted as the premise fot preparetioh of final construction design , . . plans. .• ,... . . In conclusion, I would like to point out that according to the letter dated the 22nd of April, of which you received a copy tonight from Bill Geibel, who is the District Engineer of the ,. .,. „ Oregon State Highway Division, which was addressed to the city planning director, he states that the access plan ecommended . . in oUr March, 1980, report is acceptable to the Highway Divisien and that lithe Highway Division can live with the report's . recommendations from a highway operational standpoiht.” We -, feel like that--oohtrary to the staff report..-feel like we have ' addressed the issues of traffic generation on Main Street and the impacts that the site development on that Street, We think with the approval of Mr. Geibel here as far as HighWay 99W is • 06hcerhed, that we have met another condition itdicated in the staff report. With that I conOlhde my prd$eutation. , , . . Tepedino: Thank You, Mr. H°be°r" •. , :Bishop: This tune -- I am Jo B. Bishop, Tigard taxpayer and landowner and (1. veloper -- I have appeared before you before, and 1 appreciate the opportunity at this late huar to appear before . . you now. Chairman Tepedino and planning COmtissieh members, on .. behalf of myself and as ah individual developer of this property in joint develOpmeht with the Buchholz family- Mrs. Buchholz is in joint development with her children on this property with Harm 8uchhOlz and myself -- we have, as I think you are aware, and are seeing the results over the last couple of mohtho of public COMment, pUblid ihpUt, to the nut terous discussiowthat f we have had with the XPO, the downtown mer - chahts, the opportuni ties we have had to discuss individually with both property owners downtOWn, the city staff throughout the sixteen months that we have bedn. at Work on this project design.-We have been, coining uP with a concept of develomentj working with in ) friends that have been concerned interest about locating at anchor on doWntoWn Main street on property that We originally had for development, which wat 8.1 adresj and which we enhanced-. , ,.., not easily, very difficultly; through negotiationsi-ito have a parcel. of property that Would allow us to haVe a real retail anchor, and that was by aoquit,Itig four (iditioual pat0016 of ) prOVetty to the south and also to the north. It is something / th4t W4bOt given tb U8, tiOniethihg that we worked hard for and . , 1 , , --- . ., ,, • , c „ , . TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNINGkuOMMISSION !ilEARING A .,,.. J. B. Bishop/G.I. Joss , . April 22, 1980 . . Bishop: most importantly we recognize that we needed it for the vitality . (Cont.) of the project and for the anchoring of Main Street, and secondly, for proper traffic/transportation in and out of the property. • Those are the reasons why that property was acquired--that's . . , . . . .. the reason why you have the boundaries of lii acres that are ... , there how as an opportunity for full development in one fell ,. .. swoop of a large scale retail, development to anchor downtown . Main Street. . .. ' Mr. Buchholz and I, who hopes also to make a few comments in ...A :. a s000nd, are somewhat disappointed about the opportunity to address you this evening in the manner that has come to pass '...' :eight now. My very brief comment on that We were scheduled , . at this meeting as a special meeting--my full knowledge--and • . . I am sure comments will develop after this as a special meeting • for this issue was the prime issue of primary concern for the • • last 90 days of the NPO, the downtown merchahts, the Chamber of Commerce, and we were led to believe this was the primary issue and the sole issue on this agehda. A week and a half ago we ■ were given notice that instead of being the only issue on the „.„ agenda, that we were number five, and that there were four items of a miscellaheous nature that Were moved from May 20 to this • . . special meeting that Was given, which we were very appreciative , . of having the opportunity to have April 221, even though we had '.' previoUsly been scheduled for April 15 but because of the special : , issues We remain with your consideration a • . • • • to v . . . address this issue. I am sorry that you're tired and weire tired at this time in the evening, to consider a preliminary plan review of a planned unit development with the experts, with the responsibilities that your planted unit development ordinance calls for us to work with to guide this plan through .:., development to preliminary deVelepment. We have presented to . .: 1• YoU tonight the concerted efforts and Concerted time and cob.. ceted opinions of not only ourselves, not only of our 0OnsUltm ., 6nts, no only of Your requirements of what you have for your plah, but more importantly also, in the audience-mand those people will dertainlY streak fer themselves if you give them the , : opportuhity, which 1 am sure you will.0-the IWO, various merchants that are affected by the cityiS proposed conceptual plan , and also by our plans, and We are looking forward to heating your tostitollY, that's why We will speed our process up. But We are highly didappoitted that at 9:1 at night that we finally get an opportunity to make out presentation when it is highly mown that this was the major issue of foousi and this is the tits we had the opportunity to speake.hUtber fiVe on the agehda. I gneSti the final - ' that to - ' that - - inal point that I Want to take is that We are . , i resolute in our plans for development of this property. our tenant interest, as you all know, G.I. joelsi was With me on , property that was not properly toned•0 and I oat to you tor a , , ,-4 . .. • • # , 4 TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING J. Bp Bishop/G.I. Joos April 22, 1980 4 , Bishop: Planned unit development on other property and at another loc&- (Cont.) tion here in Tigard* They continued their efforts to locate in Tigard, but we are having Aifficulties in an absolute, outright permitted use, retaining their interest where the planning staff, as you Will see--And I think when they expltin to you what Concept No 11 is up there--when they attempt to redesign our site plan for as, and redesign our buildings) our IlaeS of our, parking, our uSes of our accesses, and what we can do with our land, different from what you have--the Planning Commission and City Council adopted a comprehensive plan. It makes it very difficult for us to operate after fifteen months of tall opera- , • tional input from all parties concerned. You see up there--and we will have in or office and at other meetings also, because • this is a preliminary plan review--alterations to something we presented. AB a Matter of fact the stiff report even says, 0The applicant may request a redesign...0 As a developer of real estate in this community, I Would never ask the Planning ComMiOsion to ever redesign anything for me; but I certainly Will listen to your directions, to your guidelines, and your concepts, so X eah sit down wtth my consultants, with the prac- tical assessments of what the gaidelinos are, and design something and bring it back to you. We are disappointed with where we are this evening, but we certainly plan to have your full attention, and we appreciate your attention at this point in time, and we do have a few Other people that are highly material to this presentation, and certainlY X know you will be interested in taking input that has come to pass with the full disclosure of this project up to this point. We will appreciate your attention* We work hard at this, and We knoW this is a prelim- inarY plan, We are looking forward to working with you through : fruition of this project, as our tenants also look forward to going with Us* Mr* Buchholz? BuchhOlzt Ladies and gentlemen, I Will make thio Very brief. We have a lot of decamontation here to present--oh, excuse no Its sorry.rn My name is Merin Buchholz, My address 1.0 7151 SW Barbour, ifigard, and the is My mother, Prance Buchholz, who lives presently down at the Site. In very short, the majority Of thid property has been OWned since 1941 by the applioant,, $inoe that time, espeoiaily from 1973 6nct working With the City doufteil, with the comprehensive zoning plan, A lot of people halo been involved at this time, A lot of consUltatien, a lot Of property owners, and sitplyi X ueet I am saying that the final site plan looks as it does after Viewing seen years of input, Thank youe 6 Tepedinot Thank you, Mri tuchholzo Bishop! As a final Wrap up of our preentationt w do want to point out oi.16m ,...4 , . . -'. . ., .... ., • .,. ' . . . , . . . , . ,, TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING , • 4 . J. B. Bishop/G.I0 Joes . April 22, 1980 . .. Bishop: that you have full knowledge and full operational visibility on (Cont.) a daily tasis of the beginnings of the operational TSM program _ oh Highway 99, which we are a primary impactor of, with secondary impact on Main Street, in full analysis of Your traffic report . . . , as analyzed. The TSM program, as you all know, developed with . , citizen input, Chamber of Commerce input, Planning Commission review, City Council revieW, and approval of all bodies and ,. with participating funding from the City of Tigard and also from . the State Department of Transportation, The TSK program which is just now going into the transitional stage of implementation, completely reviewed all intersections and all accesses, including ,. the primary ones of Johnson Street, and addressed the existing .” comprehensive plax1 t. the existing transportation plan, addressed . . . the Tigardls adopted by the Planning Commission and City Council transportation plans, which are now in the hands of LODC for . approVal, hOpefullY pot the annual report of the City of Tigard, ' : of Jute, 1980. , What we are testifying to tonight with regards transportation, ' $ transportation and traffic--which has been the nUmber one dispute . , that We have had With staff, is that you have a TSM program which completely analyzes the intersection of Johnson Street.- there was never ever any indication of any extension of Johnson through to Ash, or certainly any need for realignment of Main Street through any different location from where it is. The ... State Department of HighWay Transportation has issued a letter ,. in response to the staff report, which Was given to us late Friday afternoon--you have that. All we simply want to say before Steve Janik wraps up, is that you have a TSM program, Which you all know Tigard is most appreciative of having, worked hard to develop, that complete analysis of transportation planning, and you have adopted plat recently that are in LODCos 7: hands foi' traffic movzirient and generation on both 99 and more importantly on streets that are lecal, collector and arterial streets in your adopted transportation plan. Nowhere in those ' plans, from the time we fit analyzed them until now, is there - , 11 ahy analysis of the projectiona of ...A, which ib the realignment of Main Street iMpacting Ptivato PtoPertioe, loin g the analysis of budgot and tqhdinn and moo importaht--mid a so Johnson through to Ash. tr. Janik? Janik: We're donee Thahk you. Tepedite: Is that the end of the applioahtta ptesohtatioh? Dishopt I think it ToPotahot We are ruhhihg veil lato,..itod ilve minutes of 11. What I Would like to do is iiiii.vAre there any othet parties wishing to apook ih td.Vot of this propoaal/ Ih tavot. Yea, alt. It those who want . , :ill- . ,,. . , . . , • 'T17' LL TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING COMMISSION HtARING J. B. Bishop/G.I. (Toes April 22, 1980 Tepedino: to speak will come up to the first couple of rotes so that we (Cont.) can hear you —those in favor of the proposal. Benson: I am Phil Benson, I live at 10529 SW 64th Drive, We apparently, with My partner, own the property that is just to the east. We have more frontage adjacent to this project than anyone else. We are very much in favor of this, for several reaSohs: One, we feel they have done an excellent job of research, it is compatible with our prOject. Our project was basically designed for empty-gesters--retired people--so that they could live close to the city and walk to the facilities that they waited. This was really what we were looking for and hoping for, is what Mr. Bishop and Mr. Buchholz put together. In no way do We Want a street to go from Main Street through our development, though-- we are going to haVe senior citizehs, hopefully, walking to store faCilities. I think thiS ii in bad taste, we are going to bare people coming from the community to the shopping center, it's jUst too much congestioh there. Also one thing that I think should be brought out at this time is t1ia I went with my engineer, Dick Drinkwater, to the office of the city planner one week -- we Were aware of this -- and We had before had. Wilsey and Hand, at engineer Dick Drink■,.. water and I went over and met with Mr. Howard, and at the time he explained that there would be a realignment of Johhsons which Was very new to us that this would be soMething N- it Was ()tit of the blUe. At that time it was indicated to its that we did have our city had the approval of Mr. Bishop and Mr. Buchholz to put Johnson extension throne') to our ProPottY0 I had net with Mr4 tishop, by phone, the day prior 4'0, and he said he did not agree tø an extension of Johnson through his property to ours. We Are (efihitely not ih favor of thitit and 1 partic. Ularly don't like soebody working tvo people against each other wheh we have fouhd that we 6.140 Working very close together, an the people that are interested in buYihg the hhits in or developftent are like I say, senior cititenss and We have a lot of people that are interested in bayine; theme, and ft we start ti putting A street thtough..a major street...through out ptojecti Wo aro going to le a lot of sales, and who wants . or 4 W0PdS lOst). 1 Npodito: Thank you, M . Benson. Ahy other patties wishing to speak it favor of this proposal? I am 141later qhibibY, 1148b SW Potter. As a former 100 memlJer, I lik0 this projeot Thhit.)y have done eomethihg that I think all the ItpoiJ 4 . . i 4 and that is no more strip development. I think it is a little bit late tot the City of Tigard nOW tor the traffic eiroulatiena There were those of ue who, when • . . . . . .. . , , .., , ). . • 0 . , * TRANSC/IIPT OF PLANNING-COMMISSION HEARING . J.. 15. Bishop/G..1. Joes . . April 22, 1980 . , , Quimby; the city first became a city--that we suggested traffic circula- , (Cont,) tion, and no one took us too seriously at the time. The Planning . , Commission turned down G.I. Joe's that Mr. Bishop brought up on Park Street, and one of the reasons at that time that it was • turned down, Was because of the amount of traffic that would go . through an existing residential area. By cutting Johnson Street . . through to Ash, we would be creating exactly the same type of , , , situation that was up there. MY concern in the realignment of Main Street is that it would be forming a cul..de-sac on what is now the south end of Main. I think this would be very unfair to the businessmen that have . . been there for years Dr. Partirigton, Tigard Cleaner -- I also wonder what would happen to A-1 Electric, to Valley Auto Parts ...- to these people there. Where is the city going to get ' the money to condemn all of this property? I think its time . . that the City of Tigard has watched their levies being defeated v year after year--I think it's time that they start being real.. .. istic and know that the money is not there to do this. Had they started fifteen years age, 1 think that we probably could have a good circUlation problem traffic...wise in the city, and We could try to get this on some of the new developments that went through, and we had trouble even getting the streets Wide enough to get fire engines down them — you know .- it's been A problem all along. X can appreciate the city wanting to have proper circulation of the traffic, but I'm sorrY0 it's like , locking the barn door after the horse has been stolen, and I would urge you gentlemen -and ladies-...to look very favorable . . on this project-4.1 think it's something that we can Use here in tagard--it will help out economic base, which we certainly need, and this has probably got to be one of the best projects that 1 have Seen Mr. bishop come up with, and I heartily support it. Thank you. Tepediho; Thank you, Mts. quimby, Aro there other parties wishing to speak in fart ' tUrgess! Mr. Chairman and members of the commission, my name is George ‘ !, . 1 I live at 3.347,5 $Vi Village Glenn, And I guess 1 just want to talk to you -yeah, btieflym-mas a resident Of the OdbitUnm4 ,, • ity and as a consumer, And I think this kind of a development • is quite similar to others that We have in the cottilhitY. It adds a little more vatiety to the kinds of things that we have around-,,not much different than the Payless at the other end ., of M4111 Street. I think it just adds a little bit of additional . . shopping that we can have. . . ) 1 get a little tired Of, every time I heat ot' a new develOPteht bpihg done in the City 01 Tigatd, though, to have the extension of Ash Stteet bruhg into it. It watts like every time something . , ... .19., ..,,,,.... , ,..„, . , ,, 1., . .,-,.,. ., . ...,, ,r,. , • ,-, ...,. ■ . , . . . ,r, . ^ ,, t . . , . .,, , , , 0 in .■ ,,.,.I,, .. ,,, , , . . • • . - TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING Jo Bo BiohoP/O.I, Joe8 April 22, 19&O Burgees: comes up we have to talk about extending Ash Street again. Now (Cont.) I live on Village Glenn, which is up in that area, which would be 1.3.11:2.12.aut impacted by that. Its a closed residential community with no through streets, and you open that Up, and we're going • to have cats coming through there, our kids aren't going to be safe on the streets. However, I Would saggest, though, that if you do want to open that up through there, the way to do it is with a bicycle and pedestrian bridge across Fanno Crook that would feed uirectly into this kind of a project -people could walk downtown and do their shopping, and it would be a lot better for traffic--you wouldn't have more cars coming down through there; it would solve some of the traffic problems that You are obviously concerned with. lt would also give people • an opportunity to get in and out of there quickly from that community without using additional energy, of Which we are quite short at the moment. Thank you. Tepedino: Thank YOU, Mr. Burgess. Other parties wishing to speak in favor of the proPosal? Lester: Y'es. My natne ie Mel Lester. I epresent Arao,„ Stores, and I have an interest outside of obviously representing another business which is downtown, in favor of this project. We feel that we are a competitor of G.I. Goa's, and we look very favor- . ably upon their introduction into out immediate area I am personally an admirer of the way G.I. Joe's as a local organiza- . •• tion ha e conducted their bUsinessi and ho W the applicant speoit- . ically--ao differentiated from G.X. J004)--hao made every effort to infott us of their plans and how these plans they suggested some ways these plans might impact us ad a bustnees. I am also ittetosted, inasmuch as I am no lotget a Tigard resident, in the way that this development--Waremart, 041. Joe's, the bank--,Waeld impact Tigard. I have Very Wart feelings for gigrcX wont go into a big :Lott discussion of it--bUt when I first Came to work tot A.iBoy tot Years ago as a Waro- hoUseman in this particular state (the first gainful employment X had, supporting my family) every chahce I get back into Tigatd, have an extremely personal ittetost in this store and • the cottUnitY. We think that if someone is going to come in--particularly a compotitot--we oouldtot think Of a betteti more worthy Ono, that Mai 4°084 We like the way they do biloih000s,...WO like the way they ihtograto thetselVd0 into the communities go out into the areas of MilWaukie atd Oregon city and places that thoy atei,esloott at their otigital site, what they have dote with that M. my gOOdhosbi I wish we could do as WO11, and I am very much itptedOed with the presentation they made, „1/ not to mention motey it muet have obi/1°1101y at Mt. Bishop and 4 TRANSCRIPT or PLANING COMMISSION HEARING 'Is Bo Bi8h(4/G,I, Joes April 22, 1980 Lester: hia associates te get this far, and I think that all the -that (Cont.) A.,..Boy are very eager to see them break greUnd and get going on this. Needless to say, :L-Os going to cramp our style a little bit if Main rotreet runs through our showroom, but that is some- thing I suppose we will have to defend with down the road. , ',7!hatk you. Tepediho: Thank you, Mr, Lester. Any other parties wishing to speak in favor or this ptoposal? Nolan: MY name is John Nolan, I own the property A-Boy is on, and am present on Main Street* What I am concerned about is that the Neighborhood Planftihg commisaion--they seem to be in favor of not patting through this iMproVement of Main Street, so called, or the extensien of Johnson Street, and here it is brought up Again. An peraonally, to solve a practical problem, I cantt see why they would bend the street aroUnd, right turhs, and what hot--usuallY, money today, they would straighten the street oht--keep it sttaight, keep the traffic goirig right, but here, I guess, the staff has a different idea. So to make it short - , here, think G.X. Jeets has put in a lot of work here, and we should appreciate it-snot take the idea that your staff is always right--I think they have made a big mistake here by going against the neighborhood plahheta, going against a lot of other things that I can see obvious straighten the street out ihatead of making it crooked. That's about all t have to Say. Tepeaito: Thank Yea) Mr, Nolan. Any other partiea wishing to speak in favor of this propesdl? Before you start sow many people want to Speak in opposition those against this proposal Voice: Define oppositiOn. Tepediho: Those who ate agaihst this propOsal4 Voidet Against the propesal as written by staff? Tepediho: Agaihst the proposal as presehted by the applicahtS, West: My name is Craig West. I at an attorney) X ptadtidd laW in Tualatih,. I AM also a resident of Hill $treet, and 4 4 I/11 be ahott, I'll try to shorten down my remarksi am opposed to bP6hing UP Agth Zttddt in dhy way, whether it's realigned Maih Street Or Whether itio straight through to Burnham Ztroets The neighbor I have trot Village Glenn hit a tery iMpertant poiht: the neighborhood has to ooze d0Wh quits trequentlYi either to this meeting or other meetings and quite frankly its herd to got the vote out every tithe to cote dOWA het6 to protest ahy kind of ProPosal as to the extehsion • , ... , • . : ..-„,..., . . .. . . , . . . ., . * ' .e.r,,' t,7' , . TRANSCitIPT Or ricAlib1IN6'.00MMISSION HEARING . .., J* B* Bishop/G01. Jees April 223 1980 ...1..1/4, . ,- Went: of A5h Street* So here we are again--the staff made a recommenda- . • (00nto) tions and qUite frankly I get a little bit irritated when the . ,. staff continUally tries to shove this down our throats, despite . i. the fact that it has bean continually rejected. The staff is ..... . Just ignoring the fact here, and the people in the neighbor- hood there, add they should be reminded that we aro the •. .. PaYers, and we are the ones they represent in this Matter* .. , • , . .. . At the NIO meetings there was substantial test!mony from the : 1.. neighborhood and businesses there-.I think that is iMportant for you to keep in mind when you review the NPC) paragraph three.- . • it want drafted lightly, it want given careful connideration, and the extenAlon of Ash Street was rejected* In fact, the highest Priority according to the WO is of course the resi- . dehtial neighborhood* Another point is thabthere were Certain ..: alternatives discussed at the N1O meetings, atci we heard one regarding a foot bridge over Fanno Creek* There Wan also a ,. ,. discuesion about putting Ash Street through, bUt putting a .. . barricade up so emergehcy vehieles could barrel throUgh the .. barricade, but that the residents could not have acces4 or other ,,,...- care could not come up Ash street, but would have access for emergency vehicle°. There was some mention of eta-de-aading , , Ash 8treet, I etas somewhat surprised in that these alternatives . have not been mentioned tonight, and I think it is something , that, staff, nhould be brought to your attention, , There are a number of its and contihgeheies aa to the plan--1 • - ,.7'.. think page 4 and 5 of the staff report indicate that there are • _ some major changes and considerations going on I think Mr. Jaiilk mentioned that however, there are he concrete plans, . that there is a substantial eost to all these things. 1 noticed .' just thid 1,ast month in the Tigard Times the mayor was reported v . , as eying the civic complex center is a pipe dream -it ,. long aWay at all; and the transit ceribr is ahother mere pos . bility0 We are talking about some remote contingencies, and 1 think the staff in working hore .nth some nice ideals-.nioe I. Possibilities4A‘but they really lead traCt Of realitY0 SoMe of „ n, the realities I would like to montioh to you, just running .. ,.;'.:. through my dOncOr110: Pivot, Ash 5troot is a reidential street) .1 itid 4 residential heighborheod, it's too narrow and substandard ,0 for any typo of major tratfie. You rorouto Maih Street Up to Ash, it just too narrow a street. night now, when two cars ( 7, park on both aides of Anh Street and two oars try to as each s, othori there'd just not enough re0M. As / come down Ash Otreet ' you gotta weave in and out as Oats pass oaoh othoto It'd dohgorouso you'd Create a terrible traffic problem if you put traPtio onto Ashe In addition there to substantial use by podostriato and children in this area. Its a neighborhood .. . areas There are no bidoWalkd oh most of Ash Stroot....ohlY on '.'-...., . the lower end aro the any sidowalks, people walk in the . . 0 .• • ?0, • . • • * 4 TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNINtr vOMMISSION REARING J. Bo BiehoP/G»I» Joes • April 22, 1980 • ,• West: streets» In addition they Walk on the streets on Frewing. A (Cont.) lot of people from the Apartments an4 from the heighborhood walk up Ash, then up Frewing to catch the bus, and of course Frewing is not a good street.-it's a terrible street on Which to funnel Your traffic; if you come down Main Street, funnel • • people Up Ash and out to ?Dewing you bring them in to another • terrible street, In addition I ask you to maybe drive by Ash $treet and see the slope of the street...it's a doWnhill shot from Frewing, down to Burnham where it would go throUgh to Burnhat. In being downhill.--even, I driving down have a , • couple of children, I know the neighbC,rhood children."/ catch myself going too fast. Last year a child was hit there. It creates a problem+ It's a substantial slope..the natural • , tendency is to go too fast. If you open it up for a fUrther distance, its going to be tore of a straight speed*ay. It's a straight shot, yoU can see that on the map, but I'alSo ask you to drive by and take a look at it.-it's all dOwnhill. 4 And finally..this is the most important point...and that is if you open this area up to commercial traffic yoU naturally open tip this whole residential area to Commercial traffic, and in that, you jeopardize what's hear to what I want to talk about.- • that's MY fundaMental tight, fundamental idea..thatis our neighborhood.,-those are our homes, and you are jeopardizing that. YOU are costing us land values, oUt-of.pocket dollars; • but more itportantly, you are destroying our peaceful neighbor- hbod and our homes, and that-.I don't knoW how Many ways You can Bay that.-but it seems like everyone has said it in many different ways..that's what it really coMes down to here.00You are destroying our neighborhood and our hotes, and that's some- thing not to take lightly. So / Would oppose any ektension of • Ash 8treet. (Applanee front audience.)) • Tepodinbt (GaVelling for order) I don't wt anY oUtbnrsts in this Meeting. If YoU are going to applaud, I4d appreciate Your leaving the building. Now Whr 1 would like to do is, we have heard altost t*o hoax Of the 0.1iplicant8 and the proponents of this; / Would like to askpeopie that are OpPonents of this--those against-0 and I aidhit see anyone who woUld like to spec% 4.- (interrupted) Voieet I represent a hundted people TePedinot Are you OpPonents or proPonents2 VOicet Ilt an -' You an call Me whatever you Want+ TePedinOt Well, I have to know, sit, because .. Voidet, Call le an opponent to thq staff's Plan.- need to kno*.‘are you an opponent or it.propohorit of the . • aPpliCatiOn as it Was filed with the City of Tigard? • • • • • • • „ • , TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNINe-uOMMISSION HEARING J. B. Bishop/G.I. Joes April 22, 1980 • Voice: I am an oPPonent6 Tepedino: Okay. fine. Smith: Mr', Chairman, I think at this time it would be a good idea to • clarify: I would like to ask here ..- How many people are here for the purpose of opposing the extension of Ash Street to Burnham? May I see a show of hands? (Murmur in audience) Who are here to oppose the idea of extending Ash Street through to Burnham? From audience: Or' 4ohnson! Smith: Now, T would like to ask another question: How many of You are here specifically for the purpose of Supporting the application of this development .. aside from extension of any other streets? Tepedino: Well, Commissioner Smith, would you try to focus the issue? Smith: That's why I at trying to clarify..there's an awful lot of people here, and I'm trying to identify: Are you here for the Purpose Of supperting the G.I. Joe's development, or are you primarily here for the purpose of voicing your desire not to have Ash Street extended? From audience: Both (several voices)* • TePedino: All right: we are entertaining people that would like to speak on the issue that hae been presented to the city Planning staff, and also the Planning Commission. Now if there are andillarY issUos that directly relate to What we are trying to hear tonight, that's alio; bUt I don't think We have the time Smith: I am afraid what we are hearing, though, is essentially on the wrong issue* (Outburst froM audience, gavelled down by the President.) Tepedino: A11 right, I'm not going to have any public ontbilrsts horse Voice: You'll get fired if you don't listen .. ToPedinot That fine; if you would like to try it, give We otter name and addreaeo..I'll have YoU on the Planning Comthissioh s soon as there .1.* Voice: May / speak, becaUSe I think X represent a large number of people1s • TePeainot °harp ate you eth OPPOnent or a proponent of something that's being talked Up tonight? We are only talking about the issue a24" !." TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNINWLCOMMISSION HEARING J. B. Bishop/G.I. Joes April 22$ 1980 • Tepedino: that has been presented, and that's all I am going to take (Cont.) evidence on testimony on If You have some other .4.. Smitht I would like to clarify one item: If, regardless of what happens here tonight; the Planning Commission tonight is not, in any way, approving the extension of Ash Street: that is not the is8ue. We cannot essentially approve that issue tonight. What we can do tonight is to approve or disapprove what has been submitted to us by the applicant for that development* And, it is important that you speak to that issue. The issue of Ash Street is somewhat a separate i0Sue. Now what I think is happening here is, many of you here are speaking on the issue of the extension of Ash Street. We can talk about that all night* In the end, we must make a decision based on tea applicantts what the applicant has presented. Tepedino: And that is basically a zone change...4GS) 6..80. That's what we are hearing tonight, and that's what we are going to make a decision on. NOW do you want to be recognized, sir, or not? Voice: Underneath the restrictive constraints of that statement, I cannot testimY. Tepedino: Thank you. Is there anyone wishing to speak in opposition to the proposal that we have before us tonight, and that's ZOPD 6.*806, Yes, sir. SaUb: Mr. Chairman, GomMission members, staff: I am C4 R. Saub; a freeholder oh Burnham Court, intersection with Hill Street. I am in opposition to the proposal of the applicant to install G.I. Joe's and Waromart as they have presented ito CouliersolY, I favor the staff's outlook in approving it contingent upon that thorOughfare there, which Certainly appears to be a must, Now the extensive and exhaustive traffic analysis as presented by the applirmnt appears to be after the fact, and intended, APParently, to sere their own needs as to the design they had already submitted previously e Thank yobs ‘EePedino: Thank you Mr. Saub. Any other partied wishing to speak in Opposition to this proposal? Yes, sire, Johnson: I have A letter here ail. Tepedinot Do Yott Want to read that into the record? Would you like to give Oral teStiMeny on that, sir? Or do you want it read into the record ...b. Johndon: Read it into the rederd. • Tepedino: Okay 4 A t 1 TRANSCRIPT Oar' PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING Jo Bo Bishop/G,Is J0es A. April 22, 1980 Howard: (Read letter dated. April 22 1980, from Paul E. Johnson'res opposition to construction in floodplain, and lengthy suggestion for solution of Ash Avenue problem, See Exhibit B.) Tepedino Okay, thank you, staff* Are there any other parties wishing to • speak in opposition to this proposal? Sirl Johnson: Can I show You on the map how this plan world work on the blockade? • Tepedino Well, 01111Y1 if you will do it very quickly., (Note: The tape was changed during the presentation by Mr. Johnson of his idea to prevent through traffic on Ash, which really had no pertinence to the hearing.) Smith: I really appreciate the idea, but I don't think this is the appropriate forum. Tepedi'o Any other parties wishing to speak in opposition to this proposal? • Howard: Yost sir; a ooP ' of Mr. Butler's letter to be made a part of the record, and each member of the Planning Commission will get a copy unless you want it read now. Tepedino Yeah, why don't we read it That's in oppositi o`i to this proposal? Howard. well, I ,haVena t read it myself. ( bcclamation from a adiencoi) Well, I just got it this evening, if you don't mind. Topedinc: Okay, why don't you read it for the record, c. !Howard: (Read letter froil John AY Butler advocating access front the rear to the project; see Exhibit Co) f _ Tepedind: Thank you, staff. Ahy other parties wishing to speak in opposi tion to this proposal? Voice; Mr. Chairman: I think you should er Tepa r dino If you want to speak, you are going to have to come i.p and Y;. identify yourself, please. My name is Gary ???????, and I really feel that you shotuld Voice: .y ectetnd the ceurtasy .to the representatives of 100 citizens of Tiger rc;: as you did to .Mr. Jo1,nsonb Tepsdinot Xs the repreeentative of a hundred citizens Of Tigard hero? Ate you in favor or in opposition to this propessd l? (outburst 2p ,.+w...f.....+..wr. em.,.+.c�,nv, ,,,u,.,n✓dnrn..,y..,,.s;.» mMSnr,.:.w+.,,..... ,r.......„ -...........::::.,...........:ry:.....-r-+•-n^»r-.-w='I¢X57^tcsa;C�.a'�7'2�sJttivevfiM1ilt#�� ...•wi•. u. d •I, .-)': ... ..-, . . .. . . . ,.,.., , 0 ', , :., ,. _,. A L. ..., TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING COMMISSION REARING ., . . . .. Jo B ashop/Goie Jobs 1.., . . . . April 22, 1980 , . . ,. ,. . . , ,., ,.. • , • .H.: Tepeditot from audiences) YOU khOW, this is not a general fort* Where i,„ (Cont.) anyone who tiehee to speak on any subject can walk In off the street* Ile, are taking evidence ** this is a formal hearing, . „ . We operate under the Tigard Municipal Code ... if you have some ., problem With that., see the City Council Popp: Mrs, Chairman, 1' am sorry. X have sat in the part of ChairMah ••••:„ of this planhih6COMMiSelOn, and I think we are the way to hell • /...• off skew right now l'orahk is absolutely correct in asking $0tObodY, "Are you either opposed, or are you in faVerelt Now . . that's not too much to ask of this gentlemen whether he's w.., . juSt a minute, sir ... whether he's representing himself or 100' neighbors, ox' whoever he Lee Itfe a simple, stateMeht, either • . . .,.. you are speaking in .Vor of a ptoposal Or in opposition to . . , - A. ptoposal. Now that is a simple statement of fact and I think he is entirely correct in asking for it* NoW the only other .. point 1 Want to make: I think the cOhdUet of some of the people . .. .. twilit) tonight has been pretty damn bad., When you speak, you are giVeh An• opportunity to speak, and / think we owe it to each , . other to shut our mouths and liatein to the opposition Speak, Whether We like what they say or whether we don't like what they • SaY, But we've got an obligation I think, and of right and of courtesy te, our fellow citizens to hear them oUte, Now as '441i AO 1 Ati cohdOttOdf we atd talking about a J. Be Biehdp/tudhhOlt ., .. 4deito1opment here, and I think that's What the iebde should be. . , 1 al sottyk Mr. Chairman, •,, , TepedihOt hatik you, Commissioner Popp. Vjouove been in this chair, and X know Where you stand. Okays Anybody else wishing to speak . in oppOsitiot tO,the prOpesal? :Opposition...those against? , . . . . , Voice r* Chairman, what authority do you have to keep the proponents If this td stop them from speakingI They haven't finished yeti, .. . . IA that 13.0t ddMOOrAcy aiaii. , , . , . . . (StiVOkal people speaking at once, Preeideht gavelled for order.) . . . .. ... . . '..,,•., Voice: 1'11 idehtifY myself as in favor of the propOsal as stated by _Sr.. Bishop. „,,.. . Tepoditot Well,. thatis Wohderfdl. :0112 glad to hoax you say that* ,And .. I W4.11 recognize you 4,» for About five minutes,, It's now .. eleven Voice, I Wi5h#tiooiiI VOhOt even take that much of your tine. . , i'lpectitiOt Greats tot no reitdrato, at midnight I shut this heating down. .. , Xf W haVehit 00te. to A addition, then sd-be it, and we will pick it Up at the UeXt public hodriAg* , _ . 1,4Uotit MY Admo ie' Atolto Vdust444 X Att. a reeidaht Of Tigard' a. dititeh, , ).,. • • .;! . • ,• ..• "..."..'-^.".`. .". „.... ...............■,..--■..■................................, • . , '.. • . . .. . . . I . . 4 TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNINC:JOMML3SION HEARING J , B. Bishop/G.I. Joes April 22, 1980 o'. Fausti: a member of NPO #1, and resident of the area that encompasses (Cont.) Ash Avsuueo Without saYing anything, I'll submit' a petition . that is consistent with the plan being proposed by Mr* Bishop .,.. and his asseciates, and let the petition speak for itself as a matter of record, and will not take any more of your time* , . (Presented petition for record. Note: Tao petition protested _ anti extension of Ash Avenue*) Tepedino' I now close the pro and con portion of this hearings and open .. . .. it for orosseoexamination and/or rebuttal -- if anyone has any . cross or rebuttal on the issues raised* Yes, sir* . Janik: Mr* Chairman, my name is Stephen Janik$ speaking for the applies cants* Mr, Smith is entirely right. We are on a'specifid . . .. JA ProPosal. Mr, Pop , I think, is equally right. The issue is not the overall transportation plan for this cemnuinitY, nor the H issue of a civic center* We respond to that only because your staff's report finds those as reasons to recommend denial of .. our request, We avibmit that this request shOUld be judged on its own merits apart from those larger*scele community issues that at least two of your Planning Commission members I think have quite properly indicated are not before you. Thank you. Tepedino: Thank you' Mr. Janie Any other parties wishing to speak on 7 cress...exam or rebuttal? Staff, do you have any questions or comments? . • Howard: '',.Bs) Sir. . Tepedino: I close the public hearing on this issue* Commissioners? .. Smith: I would like to start out, first, to settle one issue, If ., this proposal wore approved as it i , this in absolutely no way guarantees the residents of the area that Ash Street will not be continued through. I Would like to take yell. very aware of that, because the continuation of Ash Street is a separate item, and Whether a street Jet run through this development or not to Ash Street has nothing to do With whether or hot ASh Street is going to be bUilt with a sUbdivision later. You understand that . Ash Street doe not in any way come ih contact with this property. So many of you who have been here with the concern of the cone, tinuation of Ash Street, I think yehere getting into an.area where having this approved i0 not going to guarantee what .you are eeeking4 ..„ . NoW I havd a couple of comments on the ProPosal are it iS0 , One Problem is concotthing our floodplain ar476-t= wtich if I understand , . correctly is also a designated greenbelt, elAd 1 Woulbd like ) staff to correct to*.d, portion of floodplain area which lies direCtlY Under ay.. it 140%0 like the east side .— , .428.. . , a '. . • • , TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING ..,,OMMISSION HtARING J0 B* BiShoP/G*I0 Joes April 22, 1980 Howard: Yes, sirs that's correct* Smith: Has staff worked with the applicant on this, and is there any general agreement in resolving that? Howard: No, sir, there hasn't. We have tried to Work with the applicant, but there has not been. a resolve of that issue. The building as the site plan shows in in the floodplain* Smith: Okay. And the greonway? vioward: Yes, sir. • Smith: OkaY4 So we do have * $ • (2 or 3 Words unclear)* Howard: Yoa dot but you also have an application for a sensitive lands permit, which is a portion of the record* Smith ' Onb of the problems that I have with the traffic circulation pattern ie that essontiallY yoU are saying that yoUr access to the Pacific Highway at the south end of the project..I understand correctly * 0004 do no leaving, leaving this preject. Bishop: At the north end, onto Main Street. Smith: Okay, you are going to have a right tarn only? At the south end, does that have the same * * * * Bishop: The State Highway Department letter which Was issOed after the staff report was written is absolutely a three.phase signal where traffic would stop comingo.as part of the TSM programs.- coming from north and south Smith' I just needed a little extra 4 4 o ch that, tishop: It Will be signalized0 Smith: 0 0 a 0 (a few Wetde 100t) 4 DckiS that align with any other streets ph the other side of Pai...4tic Highway? Howard: To the south? No air; it does tot, st, Anthony's parking iota $tith: Okay What is the street RoWard; Mckenzie ie the onewWay street by Floyd's restaarant. No, sir, it does not (cross the highway). Smith' Okai* On the north aceeee......that0e right turn only? Aewardt Yea* .„.4 1 r 0 TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING kdOMMISSION HEARING .. t:i Bs B chop/G.I6 Joes April 22, 1980 Smith: Anti so all traffic that wants to enter 99 and travel soUth either has to go by Way of the south exit or essentially through Main Street, around the loop. You can't get out the north end and access onto Johnson .Strut or Pacific HighWay in either . d:.rec tion? Howard: That's correct. • Smith; Okays So the thing 1 want to say is the only exit to Pacific Highway is the south exit, so essentially the traffic getting • onto the Pacific Highway to go either north or south is one ,i exit, unless that traffic is channeled all the way through ' Main ,Street, T have a little bit of a problem with that due to the size of this development, x don't know the solution ' and. am not proposing one, but x have a problem with one exit ', to 990 or otherwise channeling that channelled traffic... can see people loava.ng this wanting to travel north on 99, and their option might very Well be to travel all the way up Main Street, Which is already a problem, particularly Wlth the development at the other ends At the moment 3 really don't care about streets getting over to Ash Street or extending Johnson on through; but I think there still are going to be some problems with ;Just the circulation to 99 and Main Streets, : Tepodino Thank you, Commissioners Commissioner Popp? Popp: Excuse me while 1 cool down. m®pedtne Okay I'll come back to you. Funks Let o just say, Mr.. Chairman, that T have read ()Very word in 4 this wi,o'le presentation, .Aid being a businessman in Tigard, r have absolutol;Y no opposition to ttigard e a • . a a . e IoW©ve•, Uhtil the transportation plan will benefit ever b�oda' P in Tigard 1 am going to withhold my a',pp�r 7va1, until somebody Works out a better circulation plans . TepedPno Thank YOU, Commissioner Punk, Commissioner Bonn? 3onn' wall, I did same calculations based on the e, ti hated trip generation, and they figure here 840 card per hour; that figures out one car per four seas?ndsa That'd a hall of a lot of traffic o feed obit of this tto elite. ,The other areas in toW n that have very large traffic generators, any tints of the day other than real Nate or real early, there is a traffic , dm from the gounty lino all the way through Tigard, 4 . 4 . (lower.ed. voice, phte Lost; concerned traffic) . . project loops very nice, d I aid in favor of it then the traffic prvbletn is resolved,► , . Te F eda.;no; toi ,dsa,onor �Ieltex? • , , , --------------------______________________ ;:„. ,,, ,,,, ---_________________ .......................■. '"'... .........!...- . . . .. 1.• ... .■ 0 TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING UOMMISSION HEARING J4 B, BiShop/Golv trees April 22> 1980 .. Helmer: Well, I have to agree with Commissioner Funk ebbout the Main . . Street traffic problem; and also I have a problem with the layout of the parking lot 4-0 there is no way that they are going to , . get any kind of semi trucks across this parking let with any • kind of traffic at all and make deliveries> and even • • 0 , . e 4 * at night* . , TePedino: Thank you CoMmissioner Speaker? .. Speaker: Well, I agree with Mr.) Funk that there are ,... well let's put it this way: I think there are larger issues that 11.4ve not I . been faced up to, and that is that greater good to the community for extension of streets* .. 7 Tepedino: Commissioner Herron? Verren: I have to questions I need clarification on do I understand f: it rigil,,t that if yoU are coming out the north end of the shopping - Center and you arc Wanting to make a left.Rhand turn onto Johnson, you Would be crossing traffic? Is Johnsen going to he traffic-40. • Howard TO the horth on Main Street by the library at the present tine? , - Herron: Pighto 4 , q Howard and others: You would come out nd take a right turn ...you cannot . ..i,1,, Make a left turn gerron: Okay> se that would be safe so far as that .. the Way it is proposed>4 try ther question> is it right that there is going . to be a stop light at Waluut Street.a traffic light is going . . to be indtalled at Walnut Street? And. Park Street? . , . ''' • ' HoWard: t Yee, ma Wag HOrrett And hen,if we had another light hero, it would mean Johnson. ' 11 thiS streetirsthis intursectiewsimaud Walutat. 0 }toward: . And School Street...4)11'6 that6s a pedestrian.actuated one‘ Herron: OkaYo MY fooling right sow s I Would have to go With Commis_ , , , Lon sioner ruhwt I tAl-Alt this traffic elt4eit;L de My Main prObleme Tepollino: ; Thank yo e qowlissioter Xolleas? tColleas ¶he rest have stated My doubts on this whole thingi I think .. iq ., the traffic 11; atrOcions noWti, And adding that tnuch more „ 6 4 4 tOWA. tt's terri'olei And they haVen't Made that much of an effort to ease the traffic problem at all. Another thing is the w... tight at Johnson, and this one t the south, whore they have designated a—. wouldn't this Conflict betWeen those two ights? . . . .310. • • , . . 4 , . • • ( v. TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING J* B. 13ishop/G*14 Joes April 22, 1980 Tepedino: Staff? Howard: Between Johnson and this proposed light is 375., 3,0, something like that. That's what they call for the stacking distance* That°s mandatory* Tepedine: Okay: thank your Commissioners* My only comments are to reiterate what has been said here already* The other point I would have to make is, it seems to me first of all, it soutds like a Well thought out proposal as far as it went: Tigard would 'benefit from something like that* But in additioh' to comMents MBA() by my fellow commissioners, the other thing that bothers 'Me is there seems to be: or there seems to have been, some kind of a breakdown in communications* I hear staff saying something about the traffic pattern, but I hear the apPlicdht saying • that he has already addressed it and I canot understand how that happened: but maybe it's the lateness of thd hour. nut other than the transportation/traffic patterns, the floodplain issue which was raised 0. it just seems that we have incomplete data on this thing, That bothers me .. when We get data on the 'night of the hearing,'Ahats ,:,,seless• I'm alwayd bothered by that Staff, do you have any contents? Howard: The reasons for denial were that .4.a if you just go through theme I spec asked that the traffic study ie you krow, that We have talked about. And the applicant addressed specifically the fact that a portion of the land he has included in the proJect is not under his control. Now We have not had a project sine I've been here come to us where there wasn't coots atten- . tton given to that fact. mlsook, I am trying to develop this piece of propertY1 and I don't control it, nor do I have a plan to control iteu That's a little disconcerting, The impact of the large structuree.—I think we can work on that real easily, there's no difficalty* Wo have provided the PD ordinance: it may mean the manipulation of a few buildings to Serve, You knoW, the needs Of the neighborhood .. I didn't think that was so difficillt, The indirect source pertit .s that's a toUghiee There are Some probleMs in that particular area there are problems in Tigard gaaarally; via have heard cot:no:its made About air pollttion, + not just oU this project, but taAY other , It would seem that rather for us trying to approve it, conditioning the applicant to say, uWell, will you guarantee to Us that you will ih fact live up to that dictate of DEqi" and the - siy, wtoa can't bUildo .. it's a stall box to be in, and %id like to see that 4 resolVeal or at least some attention giveh to that ih a prosenta.m tion befots this body, becaUSe I think it's imPortAnto and think We hp.ve heard that ehoUgb tiM0e to realize that the Nt.wraria, ' .... ' w ' ... . , .. . • . . . . Q'f.. . .-. .0 , 4 TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING .„ ., Jg Be Bishop/G.I. (Toes . . April 22, 1980 ' ,..• ; .•: Howard: impact that We do create by approval should be subject to that (Cont.) regulation. .. At last night's City Council meeting, Councilman 3rian, with • _ . the approval of the majority of the Council, directed that we-- , • •• . ,, myself...meet with all interested people, set up a meeting...we • , have put out flYers..-there are invitations to the meeting on the ' 7 , back table...there will be notices in the public newspapers, . 0 we will contact service clubs and the organizations.' the Chamber of Commerce, businessmen, whoever. Their directive was • that we gather the general consensus of all of the people in Tigard relative to this project and relative to Main Street 1 . , development...we are talking about parking alld a raft of other things, and to sit in this room on April 30 at 7:30 p.n. . . . The Focus on Downtown Tigard in the 1980s, This is an invita- tion to anyone who is interested, Wood like you to come and make your wishes known to Us so that we could react to them. . . Council has also directed that We seek funds for the civic center, The Friends of the LibrarY have requested and Will be . , granted a certain portion of motley this year towards the building , ...• of a how library, so they are instrumental ih. the redevelopment . of downtowno WO have met with the Chamber of Commerce .' other groups* Maybe tWo Years ago the Project was dead, , I think that until we do get that reading, and 1 thihk 1 yt' represent the Conncilts wish, until we get the reading frt. the people on all the issues through this ihformational Mee and sharing ideas With you, that we don't have a firin hand 6 . . such things as this development, which will be with us for Mt, Year to come. . . • ' : Tepedino: Thank yen.) staff. CoMmis6ioners? '? , . FUhk: I should like to ask a qUeation: maybe 1 should know the answer myself, I don't. Is there any Way that We can salvage for the . . applicant ahy portion of this apPlicatioh here? Cah we break off? We canhot break off? „... . 1 Rowardi Well, the diffionitY i8 that you break offfm-youore looking for • Vi;:etZ Ilijiill: td1(1):Yshc:411tm:e::ct; w!1),:iw:httia.Ettl:ettialk this ii tc1(;:tpal:t, , phacie, or we talk about a portion of the development....ir WC Just come back with a traffic ahalYeiS, What we are asking for, WS cable 1:tack with 15E01, what You're asking for ... ToPedine: It may hclt be fait to the applicant0 beeande if We break off a piece and think ittn groat, and he comes back and Want t the green light and We saYi loWelli now, We don't lilts the fleedPlaih deVelopmont . . . . Wodld you co Me back oh that' I was Mist thinking of the zoning Perstion of ite But to ..i3- 4 p TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNINd'.Q0MgISSION HEARING A 1,, Jonas APril 22, 1980 Fuhk: restrict him to come back with a detailed traffic study and a (Cont.) realigned Johnson street and Main Street, I don't think I am in favor of a Main Street/Johnson Street realignment as it is proposed on the wall. Howard: That's fine. All we have asked is for some alternatives, and we have asked this now since the applicant first came through the door: Please show us alternative plans) please provide information so that we can (aadquately address some of our concern s. and repeatedly we got a traffic count and the same ihtersectiOns. Now you know. that's .— and he's known about this up front for a long time. Okay. Now he will oay to you, as he did this evening, oLook--lon Made me keep doing these traffic counts and traffic analyses." That's right. Because every month he added a neW piece of propertY0 H went down and got Waremart..that wasn't in the original proposal to us, so that changed the entire complex of the site. Now it's very • difficult for its to adjust to that when the project keeps enlarging and the uses keep changihg. Tepedino: Okay. OommiSsioners% The hearing is closed on this.—it is up for yoUr action now. $mith: mr. Chairtah, I don't really favor the staff's position of ektending the street on through to Ash, and I think there is A reality here that we ought to cOnsider, and that is that we • can work Out...staff and the Planning OomMissiOn and the aPPli.ii caht..the best technical detail; but We tahlt ignore political realitieS. And in general I don't like to give pOlitiCal realities user lip Service; still1 they do make a point con.. cernihg past attitudes of people in the neighborhood; and uhloss somebody here has aoiie real ihdidatieh that the City Council is • going to in the long run absorb that type of ptessure, I think thatob a reality, Okay. Hitt /am not Particularly in favor '.. I'm not Sure. Aldie, that that is the solution to that area. HOWatdt I'm not either 43 smith, think therd thaw be some coMPrOmiSe8 that we oah deal with later. SO.obut I'm not happy With thd apPlicant'e present traffic patterh, and I tealite it's a diffiChlt pkoblemi and I dohlt thihN the applicant is hedging quite as hatch ad you thihki but / think they've got a difficult problem to work with, and I'm hdt sake that ih this Pattioular aPplioatioh that we have resolved theint and what I really would like te Odd is a great deal more cooperation in the dpplidaht Etha the Staff te,try to ppkile up with some kihd of a better Selntioh to addddd to 99 Atha the Haiti Street ptOhlem. I am hOt ddhddftda about that's a separate issues But the kaih street oble is dhde fh the development on the other end of Main 8ttedt, You khOW, Wd ootpleteiY tetil,ig4ed that; and eOWethihg ib going to have , . . . . . • • • "r7 0 TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING-,vOMMISSION REARING „ . • • Jo Bo Bishep/G.I. Joes April 220 1980 , . to be done with this end, whether it's of that nature or a 8(;joItIt) little different, I'm not sure. . • . The problem that I have right now is, that we don't have the 4 time or the means to really put this thing together and say to the applicant, "This is the kind of thing we Would like to see." It's a lot more complicated than that. And if it's necessary to turn this down simply to get that process back into action.. and we may have to do it..and like I say, I have very little Problem With the rest of the coloePt With the exception of some floodplain issu ; but I think we are going to have to turn down simply because there is a lot more homework that needs to be done on In Street and traffic problems. , • Tepedinot Do you want to Make a motion, sir? SMith: Yes: I would move for denial, not based upon staff recommenda- tions, but denia/ based on inadequate design of access to 99 and tiesoin to Main Street, and an unsettled floodplain/green. belt question. Tepedino: Motion Made.. Xolleas: Sedond. Tepedino; Secended. Further discussion? Comm isior Popp. • Popp: Mr. Chairman, I can understand the concern that has been . expressed, since this issue I think has first come out, In talking with a lot of people.-or at least I have endeavored to talk -with people around town..I think everybody has one main hangup..the hangup I think gets back deWn to traffic....at least for eVerybody 1 talked to that ... I talked to soMe people who •; hats businesses on Main Street, citizens, heuseWives, neighbors, everybody else, ad I have contacted a number of People, and • . that X can very well Understand; I think eVerybedy e . o 0 4 4 traffic . . . . Idonit know ifIat 100 per cent satisfied, either, with the traffic sitUation.i.in fact I ihould say I kfloW I aM not satisfied, but to be very blunt about it 4 4 0 • 0 a answer right now. I am not in faro l: Of denialo Rather WoUld feel just the opposite way, I am in favor of aPproVing the zone change for developdent in concept, with the stipulation that the developers and staff get together to attempt to iron oat..therela too tat plsoblems that I can foresee...the land isdUe, and the traffic4 I don't think either are insUr* moUhtab1e....41 think endeavoring and trYing and attempt to work toöthr I think these things could be ironed OU.t. / still think there is a little bit better traffic circalation pattern. Like t say • 4 0 looking at this fee tour days 4 4 • 4 • hoWeyet I do have to go agaihat the measures we have now because 1 ttill very strongly .wt in favor of the Propesal. . . F--- d, 0 TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING\-,JMMISSION REARING • J. B0, Bishop/04J°, Jogs April 2 , 1980 • • Popp: I think that it could be worked out that staff would help to (Cont.) work out these two problems; I don't think they are major obstacles° Tepodine; Okay. Further discussion? Speaker: Mrs President, I would vote against the vote for denial with the expeot.J.tion that I think it would be better to be tabled* Tepedino: I tend to concur. Rather than taking a pro or eon position at this time .. I guess the major thing that bothers me is, I haven't read all the data that was givet to us tonight, and. that bothers me° Speaker: Another thing I think the applicant has through this, and think. We have, too, become aware of quite a Wide range of corns Which I think need to be addressed with the staff, and the staff has the same opportUnity• And by tabling I would expect them to come together, and the staff woOld come to us and say, "Well, we're getting along pretty well...let's advertise a meeting for another public hearing®" Topedino: Oka Y° Further discussion on the motion? Smith; "fess. Aldie, What ate the consequences of this being turned down..how much time for the applicant to reaPPlY? IloWard: ToMorrow0 Smith: Okay, so tilts isn't something where they can't reapply fox sic month RoWardi I think we shonld atswer the difficulty tonight that a. B° brought up about you know .. "I Was scheduled tor one tieetiftg," • • There were other people that we sdhedUled, that had their Material in to Us* 11Ow only to be fair to theM, I can't stack th0m and say, Well, We are having a special meeting*" and one applicant shows up, NOW that Just isn't crieket0 SMitht 4y Point J. this: I think that if we are going into some Sort of • 4 4 4 Or doMpromiSe on this, I think Wd basically have to ask the queStion, Wonld we notMallY Permit this with other applicants Under these circUmstancest aro these circUtstances really that nniqne, and particnlarly in the cade where the appli cant can essentially work hiS Plan oVer again and reapply and get back on the agenda? The agOnda id no problem, right? moan. it not like it Was a year and a half ago when We were hating four meetings a months Howard' That98 corrects o0,64m ,.........,■■■■•■•.mm, ....I. . . . • . . . „•?. ,..,. : ._ . . • _ 0 . . v P TRANSCRIPT or PLANNINGLA.,014MISSION REARING ,i,,,......, . , J. 13, Bishop/G.I.. Jose April 2, 1980 _. • Smith: There's no problem getting back -- It's not my intention to deny this in terms of delaying the applicant, or saying, "No, I really don't want G.I. Joe's there” but it'd my tettlihg that there are a couple of significant unanswered problems, and I . think this is an appropriate way to put those problems back on . the drawing board and work them ottt; and I just at this time don't feel that a tabling of this would really accomplish that. • . Tepedino: Okay, any other comments? We still have a Motion made and Seconded for denial. • ..' , Funk: I would just like to say I see no other way to broaden the • commercial base of Tigard Withoht extending it to Ash Street • or Grant Street. We have to get away from the strip domMercial and br6adeh the base of Tigard in order to create A community, .. and not jhst a highWay whistle Stop. I would say one of the • best and only solutions is the construction of Ash' Street; ,1 and then if there has to be either a vealignment of Johnson or Main Street--ssomething far better than what's on the drawing ,. board could be drawn, Topedino: Any other comments? A motion has been made and seconded for denial, I Call for the gheStion. All those in favor of the Motion made and seconded for denial signify by saYing aye, •1 . .. Chorus: Aye. .. TePedinot Those opposed? .. SMall choruS: Hbo , Tepedino: Can we have a count? The Motion Was made and seconded' fox' denial, can we have t count? The ayes are tot the denIale .• .,,,. . geWard: The yob wi4.1. be for denial. Tepedino .. aye; $peaker Popp go. no MO, Kolleae — Yes; Mr. Stith — Aye; Miss geltrell eim Yes; Mr. Adiftot. . yds; 14r. Funk ..i yes, Mt. bon i., no 8ix Yes, three he*, TePedinet The motion carries on a bik,,to.three vote for denial, The 1 415Plideht has a tight to appeal. . .. . ,-.., , fin v. .. -. 'k x • • 1 • V . r 0. r 1 I yy �l • v . • MINUTPAS• TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION April 22, 1980 ., Page 7 n . outside. .t, age propose. 's,��riot compatible /' h the ,prop,;=d use of the greenwaye ''The motion for,.• .+iai. then carri '. with H ut\and Funk voting n•, . o. ... r. } 3.3 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 6 80 J. B. Bishop/G. I. Joe's) NPO #1 A request by J. S. Bishop and H. J. Buchholz of Main Street r . Development, Ltd. for a Zone Change from C-3M "Main Street r,, Commercial" to C-►3MPD "Main Street Commercial Planned Develop.-. went Dietrich' Zone for approximately 11.51 acres located on x'r the southern end of main Street (wash, Co. Tax Map 2S1 2AC, Tax Lots 1600, 1500, 2200, 1400, 1300, 1200 and a portion of r,• 200 parcel 3)a ',. Some additional material was distributed to t ,' the Commissioners by ,L. the applicant at this tithe. Staff attempted to insure that each Com- 1',:r, missioner had a copy of all the pertinent material, some of which they had had no time to read. The President expressed concern about this lack of time for adequate preparation for a ttajor decision for the coinhiunity• Speaker expressed his view of the importance of this decision on the long-tort future of the downtown Tigard area, and the need to " provide for ,extension of streets such as Johnson and Ash Avenue to l absure ro e P p r circulation. ' toward read the STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS) and a two-page staff narrative relative to this proposal. r .. The APPLICANT t S PRESENTATION was initiated by Stephen Janek, attorney for the applicant. He apologized for submitting additional material at the .hearing, stating that they had not received the Staff Recommendations until Friday of ternoon, and had little time to get reeponsee from the Department of Tr ;neportation and others in response. The President called attention to p.,.../Veral letters handed out at the meeting (in order to correct the record). I' '4 r Janek asserted the issue before the Commission is only a Zone change necessitated by the sensitive lands ordinances ,1 use of some floodpla%n and that the uses are not in question. He detailed the history of the 4', project starting about seven years ago, including consideration of a civic center, during which period the applicants took the property off x , market. Re didcusded the issues Of transportation, asserting the ; the e transportation plan embodied in the staff's objections to the proposal have been rejected by the decision..makers for this area-"4 PO #1. The 11 developers have develo] ed a plan complying with the adopted policies of the City as reflected in the Comprehensive Plan. He asserted downtown merchants and DOT approve this proposal. fto pointed out the contribt- tion of greenway which will be made; It was not until October; 1979, r ..t.„�....»«... .`.q.,..._.,,:._.r...,,v.«.........M'h»a'lH�xr.SY=ra.-x=sxre::vs�eu:.:a.•�•.,ma.use.w.r.»...�*wo: _ C MINUTES L TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION April 22, 1980 Page 8 after about a year of meetings with the City, that they were informed i Planning staff would not approve it unless there was provision for I realignment of Johnson and extension of Ash, He stated the applicant's aim has been to conform to the Comprehensive Plan, and that if it does not in all respects, the Commission should state where it does not. • He reviewed the state-wide goals which he felt are pertinent here *-open i space and safe, efficient transportation system. Janek criticized the Planning Director and Public Works Director for requiring extension of Johnson and Ash Streets in the face of decisions by the City Council "that that is not going to occur.") He asserted redesign of their project to accommodate Johnson Street extension would , ' .• face rejection by the City Council because it conflicts with the adopted I policies of the City Council. As to control of property they do not own9 he stated oral agreements have been reached on the Western Oregon Mar .he, and that they are currently negotiating a lease with ODOT as distinguished from their declaring it surplus and offering it for t sale to the highest 'bidder. commented on the applicant's controversy with Staff on the traffic� ,studies, asked the Commission to pay careful, attention to the traffic studies presented and the manner in which they addressed traffic impacts on streets other than Pacific Highway and Main Street He reviewed the long history of plans for a civic complex and greenway 4 park, and suggested that with such a history there is no justification for denial of this plan because of a renewed interest in such a complex. � ' He pointed out there is no funding and nothing concrete. He objected to the request of Staff to come back with a revived transportation study 1: involving elements which are contrary to the adopted city policy. He then introduced Dean Potter, M.A. I. apps User for presentation of the r 4 economic aspects of this development on the community. ' i 1 President Tepedino asked Mr. Janek if he felt the City Council would rule differently from the Staff Recommendations, and therefore the developers are not coniply±ng with Staff requests„ Janek asserted the adopted Comprehensive Plan, the transportien plan and the NPO El. plans °; ` are the lay+r to which they must comply; that the Staff is telling them to dothingsthaat are rejected in the transprtation plat particularly, and therefore Staff's requests have no foundation in the City Council or in the eisting adopted city plans and policies. In a short further exchange Jatsk asse r�edt�ey byl av have to confzrM to the plans, and . ).; that is what they are doing here. Dean Potter, real estate s.ppraieer, iVancouver, Washington, disctisced the economic impact of this project en Tigard in the light of the Cohere. heiisive Plan and the Nib 1 plane Re defined the goal of Messrs* Bishop and Buchholz as a plan that WbUld be both profitable and a benefit to • ` '' the cOMMUtiity He summarized 12 points Covered in greater detail in the 2,4-spade ptAbehtatioh eUbitiitted, to the dommiesionet e. r ,M+a;m..outarun 44xrrxw. y c* k.: s , MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION April 22, 1980 Page 9 h^vi 1. Kehle, architect, 1932 First Ave., Seattle, who did the arc`',. dal work for Wareniart, unsuccessfully attempted to show some .slit overhead projector. In lieu of this he presented render- ire t 3 site plan, parking, building configuration and landscaping. He descxi,b,ed the principal physical characteristics of the project. He detailed the plan intended to reduce the impact on Johnson Street. p Lewis Gilham of Williams & Gilliam, architects and planners for the G.I. Joe's, described briefly the physical characteristics of their +portion of the project, Dean Hobson, representing CH2M-Hill, Portland office, described thet,, traffic studies beginning in May, 1979. He detailed the bases use ,,. their studies. He gave the summary of their March, 1980 report as presented on page 12 thereof. He quoted from a letter dated April 22 from °DOT wherein William Geibel, District Engineer states H... the Highway Division can live with the report's recommendation from a highway operational standpoint." J. B. Bishop of Ma.nstreet Development, Ltd., 1050 SW Barbour Blvd., Portland, the project developer, characterized the submitted plan as the result of 16 months of public input and public comment ` 1 . from the neighborhood and the merchants and city staff. He expressed considerable disappointment that this was not the sole agenda item, as he had been led to believe, considering the importance to and impact on Tigard. He objected to the attempt on the part of Planning Staff to force redesign of their project because of r:�.align.nient of Main Street. ,,' He reported they Will resolutely pursue this project to conclusion. `, Herman J. Buchholz, 7151 SW Barbour, Tigard, a partner in Main- street Development, Ltd., introduced his mother, Francisco Buchholz, a limited partner) who lives at the project site. He commented that a . number of people have been involved in the development of t'hiu plan over the past seven years. I Mr. B aho resented a su t mar of the thrust of the a licant's P p y pp presentations, especially With respect to the transportation plan, which specifically did not address the possible i.ipact on proposals for realignment of Maix Street, for which there is no funding, nor basis in the comprehensive Plan. PCt BL IC:; aV'or of the proposal was given by gip- , Phil J. Benson, 10525 64th Drive, Portland, an owner of the property adjacent to the east, e' favored the project because of the careful research it is compatible with his own project for oempty , ` ne✓sterb" who can walk to the proposed development. He opposed a street Yi from Main Street through his development. he asserted putting a street through his project would cost them a lot of sales. y� .,,.,..,..»-.n.,... .,. yr +M•tn,r...^uM.n.+ur.p�.e.,»,: ..._ n...m.0<,.,.yF.wsm..y.<uo..+•k*W °Ms'.tfM.4Vry !U;.`7`..7�".4.x+�r:.w..L.�;i'4.r.w1=tG`�:yi�'Y' •. .,,. N.NVT1 S vi, , ,, . 4 TIGAPD PLANNING COMMISSION April 22, 1980 • Page 10 +++ Eleanor Quimby, 11480 SW Fonner Road, commended the non-.stripe- ' development aspect of this project. She felt now is a little late to realign streets--it was not taken seriously at the formation of Tigard , and that now it is not realistic in the light of citizens' unwillingness to approve money for the city. +++ George Burgess, 13475 SW Village Glenn Drive, approved the project for the variety it will add to shopping facilities, but objected sstrenttou.sly to the extension of Ash Street, suggesting a bicycle-pedestrian 0 bridge over Famtno Creek instead of a vehicle crossing. +++ Mel Lester, repre: entihg A-•Boy Stores, a competitor of G.I. Joets, commended the latter style of operation and the planning which has gone into the proposed development. lan John Nolan, owner of the property occupied by A-Boy, favored the plan and objected to the proposed realignment of Main Street expressing the conviction the Planning Staff has rude a big mistake. I . +4+ Craig West, 94.00 SW H3,11 St , opposed realighmont of Ash k ■ Street and expressed irritation that the Staff submits this in the ` face of repeated substantial opposition by the citizens in the area. He pointed out the highest riority for neighborhood. He discussedP alternatives Ndiscussed.the in the lNPOtfor As Street. He quoted the Mayor as saying the proposed civic center is 'ta pipe dreatit' and is a long, long way away, and that the transit i i center s another mere possibility. He felt Staff is working with some t nice ideals that are remote contingencies that are, not in touch with 1 reality--the very bad condition of Ash Street and Frewing. He asserted lr opening up Ash Street would destroy the value of the .homes of the residents of the area: . It 'appeared y the large audience was more It a eared from the test:iMOn that th interested in opposing Ash Street than in the proposal under consideraM ft ii ttes Comtnhesioner Smith attempted to get a count on the two separate k . Quite a fe indicated t+both.t' p attempted to Q Smith and Te edino attetrt t r z separate the isettes and clarify what the Gohmission could and could not .�1 act Upon. After some angry exchanges, incle.ding one addressed to the President they would get hit fired, he called for testimony in opposition, i opposition given by w�. , +++TizCA,'1' e aub l3,�, 0 SW who op posed the proposal �: 1 ; I resented and favored Staffs sttg. estione because of the traffic � 3� r opposed site as n g �;. .•. � Cation. 1 0++ Patti E. Jbhnsotty 9300 SW Hill St , asked a letter he submitted ?' be ikoad into the recorr vtli4 ch rias done by Inward. Hb oppuoes the P j t cthient in tho floodplain and Urged extension of Ash to . roactsencro ... . a ,�' Avpntte, but deadending i; at Freeing. He i1: u Crated .s idea on the map a wn...,..,.+..,,.rt.-.......,,..4.t 4.,,.,...w.trjw.r».::q...e.y., m:....... .✓.,.—....,,..ex........:44..10.w.9u<P.'ei956.i ESSt'$'zlW4rou.S:6 rz....=.--,..".y.«„ st r/? n.. • MINUTES ..' A, ,. TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION April 22, 1980 • Page ll r +4+ A letter from John A. Butler was read by Howard. He opposed • " ' ' the development because of traffic, and advocated extension of other streets into the project. 4 - 44+ After repeated requests by the President of a man who purported to represent 100 citizens to state whether he favored or opposed the proposal, accompanied at times by outbursts from the audience, Stephen Fouste finally stated he favored the proposal. The President agreed to let bin speak* presented hi P s petition with 100 names without }}II peak He . C describing the petition further* The President then closed the public hearing portions L CROSS...EXAMINATION Stephen retng the applicant, approved he statements Cotniasl onersm� h and Pop about what the issue before the Commission actually is. He felt the , ., larger issue of the over-all transportation plan for the community and the issue of the civic center is not properly a part of this hearing. ' He urged a decision on the project alone, apart from the larger scale • community issues. The President then closed the public hearing on this issue, COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION: Smith reminded the audience that if th° project is approved as requested, there is no assurance that • Ash Street will not be extended at some future:,time--this is a separate issue, He inquired of Staff if one of the buildings was in the flood plain. Staff replied it was, and on being asked, reported the applicant . has not worked with Staff on this aspect, although a sensitive lands permit request has bean submitted.. Smith got clarification that the traffic flow out of the complex would be either onto Pacific Highway or only east on Main Streets He felt this is a real problem. • Funk, speaking as a Tigard businessman, favored development of this area. He will, however, withhold approval until the transportation ' plan accompanying the development includes a better circula,:ion plan ` that will benefit everyone in Tigard. Bonn expressed concern with the esttn ted peak volume of 840 cars per hour. Helmer agreed with Funk, 1 adding that as not laid out, it would be impossible to get sent,, trucks ' through the project to load and unload° Speaker expressed complete agreement with Funk's position. Herron got clarification of movement of traffic and location of signals on the highway, whereupon she agreed with Commissioner Funk's stand. Kolleas characterized present traffic • as iiatrociousii and felt the applicant has not made a sufficient effort to ease the traffic they Mould generate. Tepedino agreed with comments already offered by other COMmissioners, and expressed especial concern about incomplete data, or data that arrived at the start of the hearing Fiowar''d then reVieWed various aspects which he felt could readily be resolved, and some difficulties with this presentations in response to the direction given the previous ti night by the City Council„ he invited all persons interested in downtown Tigard tq& theeting to be held April 30 in this root. ?.t { F. Y,ro,».,,..,..,,.a:.MU,-,n,v.,.,,-n.:m„:.m«rm,wmr....,....-wn y..»..,„•,......_...,,......,M«_�„_.r,.......•..,-.. rr.rw .w4veaFaFfwre�artc?y”wt.GUficdstf#ada».•moly ^c�^^-.k-.d.Y.C�-. f t • MINUTES M2M TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION April 22, 1080 • Page. 12 • • ,.'. Smith expressed considerable concern with the traffic problem, and felt the appicant and Staff would have to work together toward a solution. He suggested this request may have to be turned down tonight in order to get this process going. Smith then NOV for • nil of ZCPli y6-v0, sed not o� �5taff°s objections� but rather on i�,n„ esn of access tom and tha an;� an unse "d ` oad 1,a�ln«»greenbQlt, „ The motion Was seconded by KoiTeas. Popp spoke in av'or of approval with conditions calling for a resolution of the traffic problems, Speaker felt tabling would be the better action at this tite» After ,..er discussion of consequences and results of denial, the motion for denia , arried, with Speaker, Popp alad Bonn votingl�. u • The President then adjourned the meeting at 12 o+clock midnight. • • • • Y r 0 , (s„, ■111■ w. ' STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.5 , ( TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION April 22, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. Fowler Junior High DOUBLE MATH ROOM 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard '. .1,07 DOCKET: ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD 6-80 (Main Street Development/G.I. Joes) Preliminary Review • d � • APPLICANT: MAIN STREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD. OWNER: J. B. Bishop and 10505 SW Barbur Blvd. , Suite 303 H. J. Buchholz Portland, Oregon 97219 ,. Same Address APPLICATION DATE: March 25, 1980 • SITE Southern end of Main Street (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2AC, Y LOCATION: Tax 1600, 1500 2200, 1400, 1300- 1200 and a portion of . ► r � ► r p 200 parcel #3) REQUEST: For a Zone Change from L-3M '`'Malin Street Commercial" to C-3MPD "Main Street Commercial harmed Development District" Zone for approximately 11.51 acres. ' ( PREVIOUS ACTION Applicant submitted plans for Site Design Review, SDR 1-80 on January 16, 1980. The Planning Director returned this application and the fee. Applicant was instructed to request a Zone Change to C-3MPD because sensitive lands (f,lood- plain) areas were involved and because the potential impact of the proposal demanded review by the Planning Commission and the City Council. I FINDINGS OF FACT: • 1. All of the proposed uses are allowed in the C-3M Zone 2. Applicant has included in this proposal a Sensitive Lands Permit request. 3. Applicant does not presently own the area shown on the site plan west of the present curb of the existing 99W off-ramp down to Main Street. Property is owned by Oregon Departme",% of Transportation (ODOT) and will have to be declared "surplus" and could then be auctioned. This process is lengthy. ODOT Mr. Bill Geibel, has indicated to Staff that in all probability, Nit. Bishop WoWlld be the "highest bidder°, but that is not guaranteed: We, the city, could request a dedication of this property to the City from ODOT. This might expedite the process. It would then be possible for the City ho lease this ground. to Mr. bishop under certain conditions or fo sell It to him. ' •_ __. . •w,v „r e n w„N..,.t a .µ uw-Nr.,.w vuyna.++aw+.+.•^rw...�. rGr.+J•✓rJ* ..a. ;c • 1 ,1 STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.5 ZCPD 6-80 t TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION April 22, 1980 Page 2 4: Applicant has not addressed the re-alignment of Johnson Street through this property to Ash Street. Staff has suggested this to the applicant, but no action was taken. (The site plan does not show this re-alignment dedication :! or traffic pattern.) The traffic study which was submitted with this • application does not include an overall traffic impact assessment for the entire Main Street area effected. It merely counts the cars and projects a method to ac:comodate this traffic from the site to 99W. No consideration is given to Johnson, to Burnham, to Ash, etc. 5. Applicant's narrative does not mention facilities for public transportation r, (TriMet) on-site, other than to say. . . ."mass transit, i.e., TriMet, is avail^.ble to the subject location". Nothing on the site plan indicates that public transportation f acilities are contemplated. The plan proposes parking for 529 cars. An "indirect source permit" will be required from the Oregon Department of Envi i onICental Quality. Application for this permit is in process. 6. NPO #1 Policy #28: "An additional benefit provided by the extension of Ash Avenue will be a more convenient access from the Neighborhood to Downtown businesses. This makes possible local and convenience shopping trips without venturing onto Pacific Highway. It will also aid the economic viability ` redevelopment by making the area more easily accessible to a J of downtown a larger market. II. CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS: 1. The plan as submitted does not address the primary concerns of Staff relative to traffic circulation (i.e re-alignment of Johnson Street at 99W through project to Ash Street with an internal connection to Main Street) . The traffic study as submitted does i not adequately address the impact of this development on traffic circulation in the entire downtown area This traffic study is site oriented only and does not address the larger issue of overall impact to Main Street. 2. The plan as submitted includes property which is not now owned/controlled by the applicant. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of this Preliminary Plan Review for a on Change. When the followingditions have been satisfied, Staff recommends that the applicant return to the Planning Commission: r.s41+✓i?6vrmwYh-'MI^nr ervw..+I.w .. .. ... ..,. . -. -HgD„N+M14•un.,r.n,i.,,ar uh N. •rplr ....+..,...rr......,....h.w+wr ..wry.r+.-...,•..Wwes,..4+,r+wM+.a'%r.ivoMYyf'P;h r 0..- .. ..... r4�9Syk160,c',..w`,7kL::1L-1MY"1��M.2�i+.u1Y1,�rMS..y�l• AMP 'I i• 7' C. STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.5 �► ZCPD 6-80 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ' April 22, 1980 a+o. '. Page 3 1. Applicant to provide a traffic study which clearly indicates the effects of this development on the entire existing and proposed transportation system , " ' in the Main Street area, including written evaluation by ODOT concerning both 99W traffic and Johnson Street, Main Street traffic. This study is to include details on re-alignment of Johnson Street to Ash Avenue, Ash Avenue through to Commercial Street and the re-alignment of Main Street into Johnson Street within this development. Various alternatives should be clearly indicated and addressed. 2. Applicant to address specifically the fact that a portion of the land he ,' has included in his project is not now under his control. A method of resolving this fact must be presented. provide adequate g p (Applicant to ` facilities for public transportation (TriMet) within this development. • 3. Attention to be given to reducing tht impact of large structures to immediate surrounding areas of residential developments and the proposed Fanno Creek Park and Greenway area. 'Applicant to relate this proposal more specifically to the "intent" of the Planned Development section of the Code included herein; PD/18.56.010 Purpose"" (See Exhibit "A") ,, ( 1 4. Applicant should have an "Indirect Source Permit" issued for this project by the Department of Environmental Quality prior to the Planning Commission's re-hearing unless the applicant guarantees to make any and all adjustments 4. to this proposal to meet the requirements which may be placed on this develop-- ' sent by DEQ STAFF NARRATIVE RELATIVE TO THIS PROPOSAL: ok:" The primary underlying difficulty throughout our discuss ions with the applicant "" has been the resolution of the transportation system. The Public Works Director and Planning Director have repeatedly asked for. Johnson Street to be continued � the Planni.n Dir through this development to eventually connect Ash Street with a connection to the north to'Main Street crossing Fanno Creek a Compounding these d.1ffieultiesis the fact that the applicant has a lease on the Western Oregon Marine building Which will be ih effect for a certain length of time, possiblly until October of this year. Added to this, is the problem of ownership of the land immediately west of the project to 99W1 The addition Of traffic signals at the southern ` boundary of this site oh 99W is questionable also. Initially Waremart was hot included in this projedt. When �'t When this tenhant found, the "warrents'i couJ,d then be it for the traffic signals to the South. Obviously, changes had to then be trade to the traffic study. -towever, again, the study only addressed the t c • , d •. ,..._....-=..eta,., ... .. . ' 4 • STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.5 ' ZCPD 6-80 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION April 22, 1980 Page 4 site in relation to 99W and did not analyse the larger impact area. The site plan now shows ingress/egress onto Main Street on Tax Lot 1200. • ' The traffic study does not provide the necessary details which we feel we should have, to adequately address traffic circulation. The applicant has told us that he feels We should provide the details. The onus is totally born by the developer and, until Staff, Planning Commission, and City Council, is in total agreement With the traffic plans as submitted by the applicant, this project should not be approved. It is anticipated that the applicant will tell you that he does not control the land to the east of his proposal and that he cannot provide the necessary right-of-way through to Ash Street. Staff ha:► recently discussed this issue With Mr. Bensen, a future developer of property on Ash .i Avenue directly east of this proposed development. Mr. Bensen would be conditioned to provide the connecting link for Johnson Street to Ash Avenue at the time he develops. It is anticipated that the applicant will repeatedly point to the fact that the Johnson street connection has never been discussed, that the NPO 41 plan by ' Carl Budke discouraged the alignment. our comment is that tinteShave changed. ,i ( The applicant li.cant Wil`Y 1 relate specifics on cost. Note that the total cost of the for i proposed the applicant if he is allowed t develop asplanned, It seems logic ro osed traffic lights on 99W (south ingress/egress to project) will be paid develop logical '. to Staff that these traffid signals could be installed "internally" at the intersection of the neW extension of Johnson and Main Street. We are considering major changes ih the immediate area of Burnham, Ash, Commercial, Main► and Johnson Streets. The Park Board has designated the Fanno Creek area from,Y " Street l Boulevard for priority park development: We have discussed the civic complex ideas with the City Council and consultants. The p y p development Ash Avenue and the ORB Park proposals could possibility of a civic Conn le'x on P g tare evelopment of this Main street lone. To date, significantly change the eh " the developer has 'refused to consider the ''overall'' impact of this proposal on this larger area Staff has no difficulty with an of the proposed Uses. W Y y P P r We feel that this. , project "anchor"� ... bring about a re-vi taliza tion of ao the entire Main Street (C-3M area. It is our feelin that the traffic cir- culation patterns will alter the exact placement of buildings, but that the uses will remain the same. Therefore, we Would recommend that the applicant be instructed to return to the Planning Commission When the traffic circulation patterns and 'traft4ic analysis have been approved by the Public Works Director, and onoT. b • A GC i ■ . . . . : _,. .....•, . ._. ,.. I .; ,. , ra .+rww PA,y .u utp*.w-.:,,,.nyw.�...r..«.y ,...... ,_�..»..,...,,,,.....,...v-.. «4 «Pa.�etlr�fi�hsn„ztarAcsr.x�:t«..-�,r�iW�«..wau "tMINIEllb ., •,' STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.5 ZCPD 6-80 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION April 22, 1980 Page 5 • • TriMet is about to propose the construction of a transfer station on Commercial. The U.S. Bank at Scoffins and Main is proposing to rebuild soon which will mean elimination of a major traffic problem in that area. What is being suggested throughout this narrative is that the entire area from this development to Scoffins is changing very rapidly. We have a chance now to align streets, to revitalize the area, to plan ahead for the improvement of this community. NPO 41 has filed the enclosed document with the Planning Staff. (See Exhibit "B") Under Heading I. , South Main Development, the NPO states - "The need has not been adequately identified for the re-alignment of Main Street and the Johnson Street extension to Ash Avenue through the development'. In the next paragraph we read, "careful consideration be given for the traffic impact Of such develop- ment". Heading II states the NPO's primary concern, primary priority - the extension of Hill Street to O'Mara. Heading III, Ash Avenue Extension - the !''•~ NPO does not see the need to extend Ash Avenue across Fanno Creek to Burnham and wish their neighborhood protected. Staff was very specific in its presenta- tion to this group on April 2, 1980. The time for a transportation system is now and it includes Ash Avenue to Burnham. This has been a topic of considerable ( discussion for years. It is our feeling that Ash Avenue should be extended to Burnham and then to Commercial Street, The NPO #1 members avoided the real issues by placing priority ' y p g p ior�.ty, on the Hi1,1. Street extension to O'Mara. Note that they wanted the Ash Street right-of-way "preserved" and their .neighborhood's "residential character" protected. The real issue is the �r ri greater public need".. If we do, in fact, place a civic complex on Ash Avenue where the Public WorkS area is now, and if we do develop a park from Main Street to Hall Boulevard, then it Seems logical to assume that this entire area will change. Ash AEA thte will be extended to Burnham. The NPO #1 members realize this fact: The Planning Commission may be asked to redesign this project at a Public Hearxn Staff feels this is less than appropriate. A greater uu bli_, mus t be served. The developer can certainly submit his p ro p osal to you, but t following your approval, the developer may leave Us all with the product, some liabilities, and no insurance, fora long time to come. Prepared by •+ro0.f; ; , 'lanning Director .;:. ,. _ .v«,,.«.w.rmx.K w.::. ...L,v,.•a•y.m+m.. �,,I.... ,,,,,nr,*.n�'i"wran'1Y,.+,`.. ..r., yti,,...,. ...,, ,. .._, ..., - - U• .«Tn« Nasiro."w�r✓wwr�:.a'aw.,d ..rtn fir, N :-r , ' i! K✓ ( t .' iftli6 I i I-' 17 1.E' 6 . 010--L8. 56 . 015 •.i; i •,.. M ( Chapter 18 . 36 1 I " PLANNED DEVELOPi' ENT DLS T RICT (P--D • Sections : 1' 18: 56 . 01.0 Purpose. . 18 56. 015 Sensitive lands . 18 . 56 . 020 Preliminary development plan and `,r- g ��..o ram. 18. 56 . 030 General development plan d' cr • � ..n .w q Lcg�;3m. .{/ 18 .56 . 040 Action and findings ■ 18 56 . 050 Final plan and program. x 18 . 56 .060 Application of standards . Y : 18 . 56 .070 Minimum site size y 18 56 080 Compatibility with neighorhood 9 e l ", 18 . 56. 090 Lot coverage. • t 18 .56 . 100 Open space. 18, 56. 110 Density. at 18. 56 . 120 SUbditrision Jot sizes. - `, r 18 , 56 . 130 Staging. ', ,` '. ;. 18. 56 . 140 Permitted uses--- Residential districts. .;., 1.;.. 1.8456 . 150 Major changes 18. 56e160 Minor changes , 18. 56 , 65 Minimum street widths . • 18 . 56. 170 Construction time period--E�ztension. -,. t, .r . The purpose of the planned develop- '� . ", ; 18.56 . 01,0 p1�r vse. A opportunities 4 ,._ Yre1.00- •,^ meat istrict is to provid,. to create more de-_. sirable environments through the a plication of flexible and w ' ( diversified land development standards under; a comprehensive ;, • plan m program professionally r , prepared. The planned deg- " '. l.an aria ro raht elop ent district is intended to be used to encourage the _ application of new new techni.cues and new technology to community 'M development which will result i.n living • superior 1x.ving or develop- men,t arrangements with lasting values . It is further intended . ' to achieve economies in land development, maintenance, street .1. .2 systems terns and utility networks While providing building group-. .' ' y Y p 9 g4 P ,� i. ings for privacy, Usable and attractive open spaces , safe ,; 1 circulation and the. general. well-being of the inhabitants , Y Finall.y, it is intended to ensure that deve1opMent on Sensitise lands shall be carried out in a manner which t': M1 protects the he � he dormUnit 4 '' .• alth, safet i and Welfare of t v . (Ord. 79-47 51 (s) 1979 o d 71-4 g4 Exhibit ; (part) , .; ,) 1 1971: Ord. r -3 5185-1, 1. !0) : , ,.. .• , 8. 5`6:015 Sensitir;e lards . All containing t .. .. senSLtive lands must be rrezorted as planned development ,,b districts before any future development may take place, p r . ! tine lartd5 are le t undeveloped a Qe planning cotrlMi.SSior� may rams e. cect�ct x' ..cam this f r..guirement .f Senses '� MMissior finds that a planned developMeh p the planning co ert 1 • 1. 2.96 (Tigard. 1/15,'75) ' ♦ t .. . ♦m.wv..aa.,y..._ry.,vrw w:.,b,^ucn..ra:It`••u».,a>D..hfl..e-.ry w,....s._ww n..a..•..var••.kMn*y rrw«.+8,.xtas.A.fµwi,+i=t,�k."4Ht/ry� C,M!7'S'�t+."kx!Gw Yr'.,:1�:7=Y ' '�' ''1,:...: � � y... ♦ t 0 to"Jy 1 ' � '�-�'' " /90 co te/8 TO The City of Tigard ( FROM Neighborhood Planning Organization #1 Over the past several moliths NPO #1 has reviewed and discussed a number of current issues relating to development and planning for the NPO #1 area. We feel that our discussions have lead us to consenses on several issues and as such we wish to provide our throughts to the city planners and decision makers. We hope to provide assistance in the interpretation of the original NPO #1 plan as it relates to the various issues before the Tigard Planning Staff at the s_ p�event time We have addressed each issue, both independently and as they relate to each other and would like to offer the following: I , South Main Street Development We have reviewed the recent development proposals for the • South end of Tigard' s Main Street(specifically the proposal of Mr. ?bishop and Mr. Buchholz) as well as the Tigard Planning Staff proposals for downtown traffics circulation and the realignment of t ' Main Street. fi :. pp i { +fie are supportive of the concept of a major shopping area developW ment at the South end of Main Street. This development is conmis- Cant With the current NPO plan for two primary reasons. t., ,'• 1. The proposed development, in fact, has greater frohtage on Pacific Highway than it does on South Main Street and as such complies With policies #18 and #19, suggesting the avoidance of Pacific Highway strip development. By the use of controlled access to Pacific Highway, this type development provides common parking facilities t parking o clUsterS of huO inesscs. k 2. The proposed development is further consistent with the original NPO plan that addres0e8 the desirability of supporting downtown Tigard 's "small town personality" by providing the • commercial economic base to "anchor" the South end of Main (', rix5.rrr,ry v.,4.1 M » .hot-:..w. rq.v..,,ra•.,Y..u..ww,.,:r.,« +-,yp.....•.'Mfr0.Pf1-., y___� . . h ki ..;r i i s 1 + , • ... ( el- " street. With the sufficient customer draw provided then on both ends.,.of Main Street, the Tigard downtown development of . small shops and a "unique commercial area" is more likely to • occure. ) n Consideration of these points favors the development that has been proposed for the South end of Main Street over tree igard Planning „ Staff proposal for the realignment of Main Street, which would % significantly reduce the development potential of Main Street ' s South end. The need has not been agegzAtelzidentified for the realignmerlt2121R.inSI/Detandthe Johnson Street extension to ------,...................................................-----------, 4,..................— Ash Avenue through the dev.2.122mpt. „................,-........_.....__________ While we are supportive of development at the end of Main Street, we strongly recommend careful consideration be_given for the traf- . -. ic impact of such development. Traffic is our prominent concern. 4...____........„ .........—........------- Justification and instillation of controlled accesses to Pacific Highway at two locations should be emphasized. "I k i In genera) , it is our opinion that a major development at the South end of Main Street is not only compatible with the original NPO #1 h . plan, but with due care in the design of traffic flow control it .1 , , Will be an asset to the Tigard community. . . 4 II. Hill Street Extension to Omara In line with the original NPO plan, the extension of Hill . Street to Omara appears a desirable priority objective. We Wish to identify our support for the desrability of the extension and suggest that should development ocoure ih this area the capability to preserve right-of-Way for the connection of Hill Street to Omara i I should be assured. This Specific concet-n Should be considered during the review of the Senior Citizen center currently proposed for this rea. ,.., , ''■ lir ) 4 L , 1 41 1 ■144 ji 1.1/4„,, ''' I • ,I H . 1 ' 111 ( i We have reviewed the AF.-.'h Avenue ..:treet -x !.t.mcFlor clues- 1 1 tion since it ws vaiscd by the Tiq,ar6 P:Iallor 'i47, 1,, C1' in Its 1 6Gwntown Tigard circul:-'ition p3anE . l':e hnv(... (:(-Iftl,!c,.. ue. lilt... ir;sues raled by the Tigard Flannin '4taff , .1:,,, wril tl..,,, those raised by ' the citizens of At',;h Avenue and tho immeldi;- 10 ,ron . ,o Oo not, at 1 this time, 8p0 a need tc. extend Asi' Avt.411),; 1. woiter, 1.ht f11 AvF,hur., 1 ril-t-of-way across 4.,h(,,, groonway olv:d4kld bo 1,: w*,.. )..r ,. ,,! . Prr, Lectien 1 o the "residential character" or 1..h(*. At. h trea n.!It.:,'Ilborhoou should ?" he the highest. priority or thin area. t... .. i 144 , '.:.' • . 1 . . , , , c i I, , , , r.' ( t 1 • ' 1 I Page One of Two April 22, 1980 City of Tigard Tigard Planning Commission Tigard, Oregon, 97223, Dear Planning Commission, This is concerning a request by J. B. Bishop and H. J. Buchholz of Main Street Development, Ltd. fce: a zaie change from C-3M "Main Street Commercial" to C-3MPD "Main Street Commercial Planned Development District" zone for approximately 11.51 acres located on the southern end of Main Street (Washington County Tax Map 2S1 2AC , Tax lots 1600, 1500, 2200, 1400, 1300, 1200 and a portion of 200 parcel number three) , noticed on the Plan that a small section of this land goes into the Flood Plain. On Page 47 in the N. P. O. #1 book, it says that on August 26, 1974, the Tigard City Council adopted ordinance No 74-50 restricting the filling of Flood Plain lands. It seems to me they could keep the construction out of the Flood Plain since they have 11.51 acres of land. The second and final item concerns the streets. N,P,O. #1 says new streets will be constructed as development occurs. Ash Avenue , as you know, has very heavy traffic for a residential . street. Some of the people on Ash Avenue are worried about ex- tending Ash across Fanno Creek. They think if it was a through street it would increase the traffic. There i8 a way that Ash can be extended and cut the traffic, down at the same time I believe if the residents in the area were convinced the traffic volume would be cut by a large percentage they would approve the idea. As you know mow.there is only one access into the area from the highway (Pacific) . The people have to go extra mileage and back • track to get to downtown Tigard and Freeways to Portland and other areas. There are plans of a large duplex developetnent across frOm Philadelphia Square apartments which would add to the heavy traffic volume on Ash Avenue with all the multi-family traffic going to Ash Avenue towards Pacific highway and Tigard. The extension of Ash Avenue across Fanno Creek to Burnham would relieve this congestion. Some people are worried that if Ash Avenue was open all the way it would be used as a highway, Here is my plan that would allow the residents to have two • exits' . Prom the area and to take a direct route instead of going one mile out of the way to get to Tigard and cut the traffic volume on Ash Avenue by a large percentage, Extend Ash Avenue across Fanno Creek to Burnham and put a read End at Ash Avenue and Prewing on the south side of Frewing so Ash Avenue will be open to and including Frewing, This would stop Ash Avenue from being an open through street and , also, out down the heavy traffic we haVe now. Many of the residents could walk into downtown thus saving on gas. There are 36 units in the Philadelphia square Apartments and most of these people would go across Patina Creek instead of going up Ash Avenue through the residental area, The residents on the lower part of Ash Avenue • and adjacent streets and courts would use the Ash Avenue extension, The extention Would encourage the pole in the new future duplex development to go across FantIO-Oreek Ieadof up Ash AVehtleo 4 — Or c? Page Two of Two N.P. O. Number OneLIllismjelZ says the movement of through traffic should be restricted within the residential portion of the neighborhood. The dead end blockadd with landscaping would do this in a very effective way. NLE,0,11,_1gligy_ial says Ash Avenue should be extended across Fanno Creek enabling access to the neighborhoods community area without using Pacific Righway. # O says new streets will be constructed as development occUrs and new streets are necessary to carry traffic created by the new development. Of the streets proposed by the • Plan, only Ash Avenue, warrants construction at this time. With this plan of extending Ash Avenue Across Fanno Creek to Burnham and the Dead End with landscaping on Ash above Frewing, a traffic count at the top of Ash Avenue would prove the large decrease in the traffic volume. Thank yot . 4-1 Sincerely yours, _ • • • ; • 4 • h (� 0 _i Oregon State Highway Division ' DISTRICT 2A ENGINEER • VICTOR A71YEH P.O. Box 565, BEAVERTON, OREGON 97071i PHONE 229-5002 GOVERNOR In Reply Refer to File No.: April 22, 1980 Aldie Howard Planning Director City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 »' RE: Main Street Development 99W/Johnson/Main Pacific Highway IW City of Tigard Dear Aldie: ,. The Highway Division has reviewed the traffic impact analysis submitted by the developer for the subject planned development. The report deals primarily with the development's impact on 99W. The final recommendation of the report calls for a non-signalized, right turn exit, approach onto Main Street and a full signalized access on 99W. This recom- mendation is acceptable to the Highway res Division. It basically results in a level of service D at the Johnson/Main intersection and a leV.11 of service C at the signalized approach on 99W. '.. We do wish to emphasize however that the report deals primarily with the impact on the highway. We recognize the City staff has concerns about overall traffic circulation issues in the general area of the development. We also understand that another alternate being pursued by City staff is the extension of Johnson Street to Ash Street and realigning of Main Street to Johnson Street. If this alternate is pursued we would like to have the opportunity to review its impact on the highway. In summary the Highway Division can live with the report's recommendation from a highway op i highway operational standp�,�int��We have_,no�. reviewed it for its impact,orl cit st.r o m. atabil ifiY to Ti ar s v oe'°'all transportation oats. These are issues best addressed by the City latest proposal e evylop. including be If the City approves the developer's osal the developer will required to 1) reconstruct the Johns( ,/Main street i nt rs . .t n, ncl ud i ng J.: moving of signal poles,, loop detectors, signal hardware additions and e' controller Modifications: , (2) enter into a construction-finance agreement, with the De pa 'tien t of Transportation adt Tigard whereby the ; developer pay for all engineer ing an d co structioncostsforthe proposed main si g nal . An advance deposit for the estimated amount of the contract will be required prior to awarding of contract bids, , » !oml!7 d-3i (fey.840 . .n x,r.. .MH >-..... w f-.,rr lrmr..R Y.t�:^Yt M•+w ._ _ • .s:[�.,.a. .sei''S: nee ._. W.'^' t � - 401 y, _y '} Page Two Aldie Howard • (3) recognize that any surplus property caused by the realignment of Main Street intersection will be offered to public auction as required by law. Sincerely, • William W. Geibel f: ' District Engineer IJ` WWG:js , . t cc: Ed Hardt Ron Ia'i l mezger J.B. Bishop • • it •.t11 ti • r '�.,.r..;....:,, +...�.,:....mn.n.<rn..•„aw..,. ,., .._,...:.:r,,,_,..,..y:..,,.,,,....�o,....«.......„.w-,.M,.�.st-a.wy.xtrnr...nru..t�.u'; :, fi}V:+-,-»e..,...W.....•-,r .. A M„. Ir i R E r 1 • F :I \ \\\\\\ i \ i \ iii______._______ . " i.' \ -I ,4;,., ---1- ,'' _ , ,. .,_ r F y '4 1 ( . 2 i F 1 I ,r 1 ,... . ., . , , ......______------/// _ .. : .... _ .. ,. ,... , , } tt{ . ,... yF 1 ••• 0 . . , , • . ,. .,,. , ..., ,, , ., , ,, ,,.., _ .._...,„,,,,,I..,...,,....- ..., .V.,../.-1 ... r.1. ........*.,..,...-,,.. .-.4 J•,.. 4.,,, .,,, ./ , , , . - .4 J. - ...., , . ., Ihe Cl L". ''') Department of Transportation Department STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION c /(.1. VICTOR AMEN Right of Way Unit i 00VERNOA ...„„„# 9002 S.E. McLOUGHLIN BLVD., MILWAUKIE, OREGON 97222 PHONE 653-3113 . , • , • . , . .^ . April 21 , 1980 . ., . . J. B. BISHOP RE: T.S.M. Project 6 North Tigard-Beef Bend Road 1X9-3(8) .: • ., Pacific Highway West ,.,. , , y Washington, County ,.„ Comment on staff report Agenda 5.5 dated April 22, 1980, , 7:30 PM. Attention is called to Item 1/3, Page 1. The property which is subject of the text is owned by the State of Oregon, Department of Transportation, Highway Division, as a part of ... . the intersection "Main and Highway 99W" , south end. . When the Highway Division relinquishes title to County '... .. or City authorities, a public use clause is always included. In short, this means that this government can use the property , . in the public interest. However, any income such as lease - ... payments, rent or transfer of title, would go to the Highway , Division. If the intent Was to expedite the transfer of title . .. of this property or to make it available to the developer more .,.. quickly, then the sale by public auction or the lease, which ' . We discussed on Thursday, April 17th, Will be the way to proceed. , . . Further point of information is that all lease agreements are two-party lease , and cannot be subleased. . . , The Process to declare surplus property in the State Highway Division can be lengthy. A point to be made here is that R.J. Kleinschmit, Project Coordinator for the T.S.M. Project in the Tigard area, is Working with the Tigard Public Works Planning • Department on the T.S.M. Project. His blessing toward surplus 1.. ,.) Will cut the time considerably. , • , • Very truly yours, ..,....,....4.„t () .,-...., (1* I ( (ILA\ ) I W. G. Hight Regional Property Agent WGH:kf .i. ' . cc H. Mead R.J. Kleinschmidt • . . m,, r1,41—o , • e . ,, • . f . , . r 'r k. .� . w . n1 le";°''', ; . 41 rig 1I _.4S wv ,#,,(� t ,, �1,..a r. t pe — ' ." '' .'' , ' 1 ' r M . ,.. - ra`y,7a u „., .,;4'',x t 3,1 ,'+:4 .rM1 l 4 51 4 a m ', ` , f 'y.' I�4ti;.:`t ; ,'ye+i r 1 ' 5v ,e, ;+«,s T,,I IoN Re°• PLANNING COMMISSION..T ESDAY •APRIL 22 HEARING•I', ,",�.:,”A',iw.', i• r, ?" ; 'x M, y, e k ' ,' 1 ,l q,7Y!, p: r,, , 1 . f, A, Y i {,r cs 1P , • - X 'V li, ' A. I t i 7", r, ;i', yY;l,,,, ,TM, /;)(hJoi r' Apr 4 2Vyk i.�,,80•1'' - .(( 1i1,1 � � �., � , -'' :. � P� -, -h n `y Ir+,•e•„I,� 1E'ii4,,, 4h.r'�1�:',f 44l!q'M14,,,,i1,4� = ~,t .,, : •- :. rr`".+.,t , {K1 '.:, • ' • e r r.A, "I���dp,:a�I .,r,,��•Is , � 0 s1 i ,%,t�. �ry • , Y ,I ft 1 r J W Ip• 1.'', k ? t�' ° n• se c ific reference, to the proposed City of Tig ard t s „<;,.. . ;,; f3at3St traffic circulation plan, we the resident 's aff ecte d , ': try Yf. ' the to Ash Street and the couplih r : . ' f b 1,A �.�� �'►1�'.U. I hereby declare our complete opposition to the . • ,;�3 ; extension of Johnson Street 'u p �g , ,�.'1. { ,: . j . ' ,'�� of this new street to an extension of Ash Street North across, • . ' " ' Fanno, Creek. A ' r r'. 0,,1,This neighborhood ood perceives this misguided plan as a major . 'contribution to an unwarranted increase of both greater resident-, � ' , , . Y ial traffic an most certainly the beginnings ofa permanent . �” neighborhood of commercial auto a ably ., �, 'incursion into our nei hb and posy ., .,,'"truck. traffic. ., �• The above is not warranted' ' It will subRtantially create y ,)serious traffic hazards for both children and adults and cou].c1 ` ' `. , marteri ro t va�.ues. We find it most unueua Y Ni.• 1 '•!." that the City would even contemplate the proposed Ash to 8urnbam ' e xtension e they fully ly a wax e of the unanimous ly sly approve w t ' ',, N P.U. p hn which originated out of the April 2, 1980 meeting: , � . ' .;.," between the N.P.O. , the City staff, and the developers of .the „ ,: ,,° , .! G� l Joe' s project. k, e i, „ We further wish to again reaffirm our. neighborhood's concerns , , CY r 1} '%: ' bat the adopted .P.O; plan yl h e'botl Planning Commission and the Tiard City Council, that. the' , ,''• •, reenway which is located West e of Ash Street continue to ser,v .'as , a� , and defined buffer in its natural state, between commercial 1 a �, clear' an , . honed property ng and M Mn Street, and the "r,` . d vela p ed lowdensitY residenti 1 character pxoperty front ,ng i .,i on Ash Street and arts adjacent acent street systelms Y y „ , � r .. ,.-....-tsar, 1^ g • , Isy ,Y A , ., .„ , „ dc,),)t., . r, (1,/ -,)/19g I/ d'ZI-ii ' ” * 't: � '' Y< �a<,r,7'2z tart.l'Y.i � (J V"/�Y' `.'ter ,3 l:7""� ���� €/c9e[ , -" , y r r I l 'kr J` k t �,t,.I.I 9�� L(it(( a/L k J\l! (I �� '? r' ���� � .� jam, f ,.., g 62 5 s.4 0. r ,,), . ,. ... al,t. ,,t..A.,k4„.4.0„ H 3 t/6, A u� odor b , .,. . , AL, il., tf...1.1,4,,461,L- ,„I .i............., ,,,. , IAA., 1--;12 . "4 44)a i E 1 1 . ' t yw " R ` j "A ,� e a.) '. , .- tjo WUA, ( 6 , , -, ,,s4 , ....t...› .1 c) I\S4`;) Y-* " 4*/4--"'i e� e, etl A !) - o 4 +, stwe"1 tli'4.4' .. ma ...•. ....., w ., M r Y , y h , i ,Pq +!v alz1•. 711 .:. r ,_, e .,. �. 1} r. » e f 4a `rY' t A; . 6.4014,69., C. ( .. t / f. A A . A a '-'") t', . , 6e0„6,4,,i,,,)_., 1 40 4itti,e14.,cy.t. /...1 '414//,AA.A/4 - . ' 4 L c•/ (ti �1 ti.�.tfc)„. 1 f' ti, IS.L. , r' ,� t{�/ ,,,,,,, ' �. J ` 1, (4.f' ,� 1a,,,,_„. 0 e,...c..„,../2.., ci 2.,:,', { a , 1 f/�,/ r {^y ' Nor 0 _. _ ,. 611,1)))t) L,,' (AS , ..,, t / 2 ' ''e /44 ca rfe,.6.e A _ i, , , ,..,, a ja , °eti/ te3 z 0 e... r�"'1i..•,.: A4 , . ' ,11 .7 • .,,,,4.`''''''....: ( • ,J,.1 . / .3/z cro ..)(,- v c t L/JG^( ' CLMZ 1 p R D (.. , c,-, ii,) ' i ; , -. Jc-,0 'a-ti.,...Q . i .7.g L') 1.) J. lit). iia.,....,d,,,,,, ti-ek..,,,,,..t., , tif , * .' /1 * /' **) 1 '..? A i-i-e-y:q.. .... .-7/14-cv---1-- j 1 I ' , ;� y f� �� a /.1 ,/e e...'i ''. eel J r A , / ‹.......... ,,,,,,r C J Maw @ d, 1'h �',r—e 4e1 y 1 1. _. M'w r w �r� 4V,g, 6,.L✓' }' Vii' i 4.\ . j , ,' , / ,,r_.1 e d 44-1- Fj'4 J►/ /PI: `. j V. / A Tom; . i::...!4 .( f/Se d 6 j'el.) 62S-1 (.,..,„—/ /..4-A, 41--a/ ttt �� . jyt. 1. awl 4 » •f 1 .�.e A,r* F, Atilt' ��.y0 1 M -e,;*y w IY, ,, . a I e* 4 ., II ' .....y, t.,n ,m r 1.. ...A -1::.,':::',',' ..,,.. ., rn s..,..�-,....r.-- -..r.o:NvoNk�t.Norftr.ie.,z..v.44„;`;m,-. r,l+..,,..,4 ,,4r1 A.+. M.,..0 K:,yA. ,-Mtrw'i1.4 w. .ru . ..!-+._I,a k`I,�^k�°'w. �... • ,, ,,,,, rTETITION: Re: 'MANNING COMMISSION-TUESDA3,''- APRIL 22 HEARING - . In specific reference to the proposed City of Tigard's '', ,.' • , latest traffic circulation plan, we the resident 's affected , in NoP.O. I hereby declare our complete opposition to the .., ' . extension of Johnson Street thru to Ash Street and the coupling •,,,,,' • 1 of this new street. to an extension of Ash Street North across ' ti , This neighborhood perceives this misguided plan as a major ' '1 , contribution to an unwarranted increase of both glaeater resident-4, .4, ial traffic and most certainly the beginnings of a permanent 4. incursion into our neighborhood of commercial auto and possibly , The above is not warranted! ! It will substantially create , , serious traffic hazards for both children and adults and could , . materially reduce our property values. We find it most unusual '': that the City would even contemplate the proposed Ash to Burnham , extension when they are fully aware of the unanimously approved ' ' , N.P.O. position which originated out of the April 2, 1980 meeting , ' betWeen the N.P.O. , the City staff, and the developars of the 1 We further wish to again reaffirm our neighborhood's concerns .• that the adopted N.P.O. plan which was previously approved by both • the Planning CommisSion and the Tigard City Council, that the Greenway which is located West of Ash Street contJnue to serve as a clear and, defined buffer in its natural state, between coMmercial -. zoned property fronting on Highway 99 and Main Street, and the _ developed, low-density residential character of property fronting . on Ash Street and its adjacent street systems . , i, ' /... 4--eki..71!. iii;Otai . . )0,41,„\rs At,k,1,c7„Y0,0...e0,__)yce—1,) /q/-etepl rj,-3-'/ *6-1C'-,*-I--- 7:144-ea .. ,,..%, I,'c ' 0-.',d..."*" ., 9 Yre,23"(#,/ /((..,y/ ,,,R/ XlAw/ ,e,t0.44i or „rt,t,--tid,›,7 '' . aefielZee,4, , 4/14.COota44.--41../. , 3Y 0 ..44,0 `1,26,et -471, ` v, ,,,d.) ., , ...,/2?),/ jea / i cf , ) .4:, Y--1,Ke m ,A,t /44_ell,„,, . ,,,,t,, , eii.,-,..., --c...--fr. / „.?z445.- „5- cr j ro / t ,,., ..c, 4/0 is vai * . U-49J. ak ° 'tik) t'(.‘i V\ \AA C , 41t4tt. f2 iv cef/, ;?,,,ofrei i j,„1.4/6",„,,,k,/ 41*44 ,1i.,, ?...,/i .. .:±1,* 0/4 t 4 •a,' � '„,1€.1,,9Y aw V .. r� ..fi - v, ` R • , v • ` ' "'PETITION. Re' PLANNING COMMISSION-TUESDAY -APRIL 22 HEARING ” �P Y n .. o ` , r Y • ,r • April 20r,= 4198n r w •l,` i'• In specific reference to the proposed City of Tigard's " ° latest traffic circulation plan, we the resident's affected It � in N.P.O. I he�,•ebyondeclare StreetothruptolA,sh Street the • >±?� • �" extension of Johnson coupling :t of this new street to an extension of Ash Street North across 4' a Tanno Creek. .; A, ' This neighborhood perceives this misguided plan as a major %. contribution �` to an unTrrantcd increase of both greater resident- 1 .1 traffic and most certainly the beginnings of a permanent �` ' ' l nurs on into our neighborhood d of wommercial auto and possibl y ! i. truck traffic.. klY .. • . The above is not warranted: It will substantially create . ," • serious traffic hazards for both children and adults and could d materially reduce our ps We find it most r'' : that the City wo uld even the p roposed AshtoBurham , 'extension when they are fully aware of the unanimously approved .a N.P.O. position which originated out of the April 2, 1980 meeting } ' ' between the N.P.O. , the City staff, and the developers of the • G. I . Joe' s project . ,. neighborhood' s concerns I .�, We further wish to again reaffirm our np�. that the adopted N.P.C. plan which was previously approved by both S p,, the Planning Commission and the Tigard City Council , that the ., •'. " . ` Greenway which. is located. west%.its natiiral Street statecontinue between commercial 'Y a clear and defined buffer in state, zoned property fronting on Highway 99 and Main Street, and the developed, low-density residential character of property fronting ` on Ash Street and its adjacent street systems . , Kr 1 . , Alamo iqdd rest 6],,,,,„:2 t - ,„ , c,...7...,2, .7„ /3 ,..,25- ,...a...: �1 r+ 6 Pa �., cj2 1 4 , f 4 i l 61 JIB.: / "� ! ,v-•.,,,„ ' V kk / N 44, j3z 3 es- rt-k..i /4._ _tk___O/e (A.- -efrt*,—;-2 , ,, ON' 1 . il. /It ,a■ ' .ca-_,- )3/V ' 40 ,LO ,64,4d,A. '-ii-4*'ait--d-it V j 4 '■It exii /,3 A.-s--- -,4)--6) a-J4- xsk- 1 ----d-4e-( d 1 r 4 C rt l�'C. 0-W 1 r �op �. *4, til,e,"6"1 ., i 8 PAS- ' r < Cl c--„ ,.„, ..?„, /r 4 w 4 t. 1 61`€x'5 1 7„i t . . ,..)-44-14-- .,,,, A aet/tAxi2.4, a,,,,, -/ ,,..r) ' 76"-' / V 95 , - �` ...4G� 4-G-e.- -x' ti,,✓1 , �� C ter.:+ =e ti 4,, . 1 ›Xtiets eXtetA 7'7Vc t-Al ‘, . . , VrYL ' ' 4,64,V40 ',,, 411f4 er_e_14474„. r.,•raar».r,wy*gRw,+SkrH „4,, «w€ ,-pr,µ o , ..� . �*.a'awwYrv..,..p €n+,trsag—Y- 44+ ..r-,--..a.i.,37.w.,,. :.«..pr,.,ies�:w—i,,:.eywiwM+eyn , � bwray 1i ., t F" r a 4. a ,�,.� C.? S S Z, . 1-,-c.,.,L.,►x., c..-L-, I Air- , . C . �,-,am • SJ .- 1,e ,.. q 5 7? _ 9 , 1 ,� + /Z _/ if,.G- G1tA" .7�/ '`G'4 Q C, ,..,../ .. d i ' '-"— a -) tA_„1:2444_,„.„,____ /3 /S/O c(e) 4s iii Okl, 7(iefif ‹: ,i . ■L:‘,..ifittite:trni a I 0 11 41,L1 AtZit}. /� ,..,;;Lr �l/( • i e444.—_, Ae lii,“?.1_,e-L.) 1, /` �,�I r7. , ,s7j, ., ,., ticilm.,„, ,' k / ,,•,I 4 ..,,, I 3,-, , , 8 I tot ■ 400 4 i W ® • .E• .x•1 . '... 1 d r /3 i.e 6 r .S.L4 . Rai &a. . 1 4 90,A4 , , . . , ' 4 V ',. i 0 4.AAA r,. „N f .• ',:e ' A •-- e J/ /5320 . .i'.• e �y 'r" -i!' 1 t n T . a4� it�.,,G. . Ord ,,,. ..,A .", /., e' A, . /- a.,„, Vi i *' r � '' -_ Ys /Xiii:2 ,A0C 1• dite4•J r.!/�• if+�,i'1 /-.. ,I'..Ii�yj��,,rA. ��i / . 1/4.--`'''' .,., .''' '' Yet l' ,4,4,, 1 3 I if 0e 114. 410ei r ..,„ •,,,, ...L.'... I . ,, ..... .1 ' ,■ .. / iS iti./44,ett,tien.As 4 4. 'rniki' 6 'I:-.`6! I-' -:;' ,- . ,. / 00110 ,,,, e;7 . - . ,/ , , ./,: /301,6 1.7.0) it4 00"" . . . Aret R � �M / 3VVo 4 AI / gy :I frs . . i ...,r-.--- ,, r ;, i1 133,56' 1. .1 4 a� �a.•'w - , , 7iif. ô, 1 1,41001N-iis4.1 ..6,„ r j 4 IA , .1. . (Z Ws)„„e.A.A.0 l / 4 I n �✓�t r� ,.,,:11 tt 0 )/( /'I( 1 ,/�. r r �, P .. ' " a ye ✓ /� ,i M , .. r, � f', , ,.rr�+F7'"r�"•d'y"b.^w"b�{'!� 'iilfi•.�•t1�6n.A,•»-ws N,r' ww�. r« ., q tr.. r7 i ' 44. 4` L 'S ri4.'V n' ':' r F r w 1pf . r 1 ;. ' � 1:-' ,'Ar r'4'k�<,t ;v Y y r+P�. � r , w4r.'C 1 'rl .� ' r 6.,,p� xTxON: Ro P LANNING COMMISSION-TUESDAY APRIL 2 2 HEARING r°'• ''" t' � , �1� ' � • , •, ;, c,o y° tla ' r1u`y April 20,4 '1980 4�tlr1 ■ fir' ,�, Wi r ,C.' In Specific reference to the proposed City of Tigard's latest traffic circulation plan, we the resident 's affected ' , . 'in N.P.O. I hereby declare our complete opposition to the ' ,ry „extension of Johnson Street thru to Ash Street and the coupling t -, o,f this new street to an extension of Ash Street North across Fanno Creek. , a. • This neighborhood perceives this misguided plan as a" major ' . ''' ' c•ontribution to an unwarranted increase of both greater resident- ' ia). traffic and most certainly the beginnings of a ' y permanent incursion into our neighborhood of commercial auto and possibly , truck traffic. <r " 'r ;''. The above is not warranted: ! It will substantially create ' , serious traffic hazards for both children and adults and could .r , 4, , materially reduce our property values. We find 'it most unusual ” , that the City would even contemplate the proposed Ash to Burnham ,. �•, n extension when they are fully aware of the unanimously approved ,, , , r N„ ?,o. position which originated out of the April 2, 1980 meeting , it between the N.P.O. , the City staff, and the developers of the 'G. 1. Joe' s project . „, '' .that ' neighborhood's concerns chef adopted wNsP,Oo again reaffirm our neighb plan which was previously approved by both p the Planning Commission and the Tigard City Council that the :” Greenway which is located West of Ash Street continue to serve as " a clear and defined buffer in its natural state, between commercial � zoned property fronting on Highway 99 and Main Street, and the " developed, low-density residential character of p ' . y property fronting ,,on Ash Street and its adjacent street systems . r , r , re rrr , , rd/JS r0. � . � ;, �4 0/e ODD. e. 4 ,. 1--.5 s , ,, ) ,: , 4 rdetiv2;az, ‘,..,....„■ "..J..t..,,eiL 3 Iz 7 5 5r , ` sit „.r f „, ...liezt, Xot 4,4_, 13)-1 S 5-eiL) /P5'4.. I'''''k .... a, i M " 45J)" ' r �. . v. ly � & .4 Ir��Y iie.__.4 . �'' . W ) y!t•AS.Cii7, ..tyl:x".1..:. Y r. n 1�yC� tr1 . .. 1 R.{Y..,,,4'.,4 r.,,c,.—r..Yf . �,_ „. <c„r «r...,.;,. "MJCa�7,�r.. .- ..._.. ..„,...,,. 'u •r ,rv*r.r.w r-+,+:..w..v,.x'w+.K..,ri,,•.r.nm.,aw,< ...r,.......«..:<..--...»r..,.. ...,.-r-°^s+.r..a+.—,..................,.. n,«.,r+ar.«raw..w,=ur1x'� e+tewtltaMnC*-rwS'.tw,:.td.„r,•L'::w , ..., - .... .. , • '1. : , . ,,,,,. .• ,4-,,..,y!,,,,,,:,k,,,, ,e..,,,, , .,70,4., , . , •• '• , ,. . .) 1, - • el-ct-/e77-174.--,' , 4 1 ,.: ' ( 41,,,,,,....4,• . ,,,;1 . ( i • 44 1' I , ..-e-e_e.., . /3 ,,? ,„, ,dz....„,,,i . . ....) ......)., , _ , .. .. , I I 32 sr c . lit , . . 0 4- , , t . l -1,.,) ), c 67,4, v...c8,),-,...., . • . ,.. , . . . • ., .4(1 k) _, :57 rbic, . . . , s ...,4, 0 64., , „ ". 1 %.. . ,• ■ ,,r ,.. ..,•. . '1 .,• .,. ' . . ,, ■, , . . . . . ■ , . . . . ... .. . . i 1; i • , . . . . .. , .1.' „1 . . . . , . . i • , . .,., ,. .r., ,. .., . ' .. • . .„..4,..k1 l'f 41 . t• 1 , I '1 . 1 9 1 , IV . I I ' , -..'• ''' ,0 I _ ... . ' po,' 4 r 1 0'i.ir'll,r'oi{,,,''•: 1, ''',',-,.,1' .' i ' . 1 ' ' • ,',o,"le,.: .t.,.i.,0‘.,.eltt,,,,°„r;^ 1 .. '' ' ; .:".''...:`,,t,,', :fT, ' , r , i , , , ,,., ., It_ ,,,,,..., . ,, •t-, . 'r 4.•''' ' •' r, • " ' : 1. .,. ek'l •Yt 4 • " '. .. , a '4 ,,i•,', ''4,•',,, 1 e. ' i • • , 41 A •4.''''•''''.'0, : 'lc• ' , 1 4 • '°' l' d-i e A ' 4 k , '7;'• • ' •'!'.11.°11 ..'1 ' ' April 18, 1980 .4 n ia , 5 / , '' , tl, • a, . A ■A'' eighbors , • ,.1.., 4, i ; 't.' . e. . . 4 ,''', 4 .: - • . 4 4 t As you are probably aware there is to be a Planning ,,„ . . Commission meeting April 22nd at 7: 30 p.m. , Fowler Junior . High School. Steve Fausti and 1 , as your Neighborhood Planning Organization members , recommend you attend. We , ,. .. ,,' , , .need your active participation in preserving the integrity . , • .., , of the Ash Avenue-Village Glenn area k ,, The NPO has endorsed maintaining the "residential ' character" of our neighborhood. I 'm sure you do too. ' ., • „ . , ' . • , . .... . One of the items to be presented before the Planning Commission on the 22nd concerns the vacant property adjacent from the apartments on lower Ash Avenue. The developer has , • • apparently met the requirements ofthe original NPO plan and ' of the city. If this property is developed, which we have to assume it will be eventually, now is the time to give our ) - • ' ' input . We have had good support from the Neighborhood and the NPO to give high priority to the extension of 'Hill Street to O' Mara, This extension would alleviate some of the traffic burden from Ash Avenue. It Would also be appealing to any new deVelopment in the area, t., .,. ,. , ., + • , With the probability of a development on lower Ash, • • ..., we do have an opportunity , at the suggestion of Aldie Howard) ' , to eliminate once and for all the contention over Ash Avenue 4 becoming a thtough street , He suggested we Cul-de-Sac Ash . 1 *,) where it new dead-endf.-,',•, , , .. Steve and I would appreciate your attendance at the . , 4 - theeting, any other ideas you may have , and your perusal of the above, Thank you for your help and support ! • 'Sincerely , • 0 ) , il /t) /7 / \ qo ) ( „,,, t , , 11 i,, ITFrg7-Marti-EriT-111)*Cr"ilr-'—' ', 0 I .• . . m •t, 4 IP . • Stevo Fausti NPO #1•I 1, • l'II4 1 • 01 ° • 4'•"4•444'.."4'.1'44.4 44 4 4'4'4'4"- '4 4 ,_., .,,-.. -4..4..4...-.,...... .4 t ..■.,..4-,1,°,444.414trner`Y,,ttP144,4,440 ironu; .4.4.1L•..,........J,4•4“...0...,.1,4t4, '' • • .4' 4 • , r "IV - ; • • .• • • • . t• " * •.;`; • ks„ • ' . n , ° t prom; Jeff and Jeanette Graham 329O SW Ash Dr. Tigard, OR , 4 Subject; The Ash Ave. Extention and G.I. Joes oi , It has come to our attention that the Ash Ave. extention is alive again' in . the'minds of those who wish to make Tigard another Beaverton. Having read only One article on the subject in tho Times, this was about two months ago, I have, een reading each issue to become more qcquainted with the proposal. But there 414v a be AP articles on the subject. Now I find that NPO 1 .may be of the opinion . ' that the people around Ash Ave. are not concerned with the outcome of the proposal. I for one find it hard to believu that the very same people who fought the extention•.a ntmber of years ago are not concerned in the quality and future of their neigh- , forhood' I think that if the community around Ash Ave. knew the actual reasons for the proposed extention that they ,would once again unite, and that perhaps this ia the veal reason for the lack of flow of information. Jeanette and I are concerned for the well being of our family, and one of ' 41, . those concerns is the dramatic increase in traffic an extention like this Would • , bring. Only those individuals who have no concern for the saftey of the children in the area would attempt to fullnel cars through a totally_r_esidential area. There has already been one near fatality on the street last summer-,are you so blioded *by- scoomidabiog commercial concerns that.you wold jeopardize more lives. The ePartments at the foot of Ash Ave. are bad enough, thanks to city governmnet of years past, and this sort of thing would be the topping on the cake. GgyernmentS have a habit of creating their own problems and then cramming their 'solution down the throata of the residents, The siting of G.I. Joes would be adding to en already horrible traffic • probiem„ and this extention 'is evidently their solution --to be crammed dovn our throats. • Sincerely, C (;)Je f . Gtaham • 04 • � . we dg Y ,t • �, r dal* '4 !, .l ` p a= iel'� NI.A,.. • —4„../ p ;.'. p -;`,alt,- t to-k' t '' 7 • r � , r YtL 1 4 14 ` ., I b ,41'1`1!4 t• 4s $ - n , rt 4,,, i 1 r '.r.r Y. S M 7` S■h« = 0'IfY lV��?^1 i t `._. .'/ ?1 F • 4i. tf. •,x s r•I t' +� ..� 'I -.,.a•: ...,.,,.. i - ,'r 1 5�" Y9, 1' r •.w.I It � w., :..... ...,x«. ,,. .a .IaY...(n.«.7.. ,, ...w.�,.}..f.•ty.t.t.,.....w�, .X ..r w:w+Jw....Awl,. r v' .'1 .ry..w • "+•'4,"""'•T"+`4 / .."w. ..+.0 ...n-. Nr..s..,•,,, 1 , . -'.v.a•0.v a.Y.l.,•• ,.,v:Epu+111... .a•h.,,,.;,,,--...a, «,.,w H. - ♦ r,• k� •.ro•, •• W r 1 ....Nw+..w+. fvj'=.'r t++-+"^..,.t,« ,...,..«�..,,,w ... 1 j., A .,-.., .-, ' l', I ... :r. . ,e..w.. ,..o.... .,,irw., 4. wMi .t:f. M t 1 ^9«.' ,.4,' .it�•.. .u,M,sk.,.,.u.M.w W'1,/+.r..l i b ! y „�t . , I � � "'� r a' it -Wsr. ..-4n •;JN.. »r..,• •.•+ ...,..,.. r.Ly...W.J.'i.r..T.WN ,• _ s. .., . p. �•. ..w1 r `, . i«..r o•<:,. .y,., . ..i : L :T : T.w. . I• • ,j 1 -Y` ! .., n..«. , 1 w • a 4. , . r B ice, ;0/ c 40 ~,(, . MMM^r "� ..,,'w �.X� .. . r»�. ; , •,.:_..• 4444:.,.. Y�r,.�,,.,. :_,:.•. 44:44.,+..«J.N.. ,, I i I'TS I f,.. 444,~4 +-, .h ^'r r• 4� 5-71 Sc ..1A1t -4.?f ?. i r .•.,rN• 4,444 Nw...' ,-... F.•. . .•.• 4444 , 4444-. r.. w r •.....'.n 1.... i•S• r . u_r�y, ra1°+I. �,,.+•�¢�.a``7K \.A,f�:..P�! .I .,.PS. �,.,�„!, 'Rr6„ ','` . y .).. t t i�r.t!�yppY” �N .'.Ro uY lFn��{, r: . CI ftrpy A WV.• w .MI`iTY1` ,•..•, 5. 'V w•.,• .. .K• 41".. y •j...,,. ., ', . I' 1 ' .'"TV ,r .. r .f. - . 1.. ',{. .. y. ,.....L,+... .L... YJ.y1,.a.4 ,nMhVY.....M'.••,MJ ..ce.FAY. -r.4 +Nt •.� "'p++.f.i.•,.r ,,N y t ' L�. i"l!A'TT:4.1 7jfl W{wr •>,! y.�l N r,. .:.., r� r,V ..KvuYr■wr..w.tr..•4...t„..»:N,.', • ]1 I AI' .. - M....m 444•+4,» ' /t`�II l i,........ .T.+ n. ,w V• ... 1 ",p , � � 1 t 1 ..P`+wwY.4 ♦ 91 IrY .,444.,4. ..n::::, e ..c.r• ••,.. ,� .'7°';T'ti .,I �5•.. i , �. p .�•• .•i, 1 a,r•. r.. Hnw. .«.' i,w..vy.' n�,N• ,.w I Y 111 1 11 «. 444_4 ,, .. .,4...... r.r...rM ,ip..,. ,./w -v,. - +. ,� - , . 1 ;. Y r _ s 1. . A •. . 4...4....V...r...•.... .,.1 rho.... .r........,.v..,1 v i� i yr " F " p .. • M M *r.ATw..ra 4 4•4•• .• I. F 1. a I. / F .w,..6.....•....r v...• .r. ,....,.J...:.Y:.• n+Aw. ` 'I7 - j 1 Y a.r. ..,aw + . P u 4 • • � � 1 ia.r:j.r. •w•...«4,yRi.. .4. 4x,4 rr1+ v w . 4 k 1,4444,. _ ,.hw....r4....sa.�...."...r.l..•..•.. .n•,. � s • + i ,, S .,.`A "fA4 wa ' • .-.... ,e+ .11� ,..,.I+,q....y...#•••' !• } Y 1i -'y.4?•r•N-. w_o .,u4 N we �., ...� • t ,d • p' .R-1{ • y .r..iw Hw1.,14: ,•1..,.'.. .MN'l.. •Y.yw. ...V r I I . ......N....'- ,....Yr.,..Mr.. «•+w.. ..w I. + .1' Y • H. • b°- :y irA°w• l7't •4444. I f : _ -I T..,.... rx� 1 c -m..-+.. as 9 .,.,.,.1....w,w...,r.,w.f,. .1„ w,...♦• .�. j . ' r f 1 .-.I.. ► - 5 ...;4 „w},+. ..r.... N..y.t. «µ... N.. .,.41 i r '+ n r I ■ 'p •r•` 'r .F..r... ..-".443 ...+.,w... • f f. t ! 1 r r. • X .r 4 ♦ ✓....6. 'V.. , ..r +.4..MN.•....IWY..{ 1 u r ^ ' ' - ` I 1 J . '• • • t '. ° ., ` uS.M, ht.... I - wiYw.rY yy . V V . a�.,y.4 MA.V4.4 ri.' ,iW`.r.. 4V: w+.IXy • .i••..wr.:V...Yr.✓^.wT,'....'h'.•'R•MI w....., A,..,,.. „r. n n ! , Y ♦ H . pp ,Jir .r/ww 1.M.'S.i:/..Yari.lL4 iS.'Ia,rN;,�....wjM ,.MNI.i •.y.t. N 1 • Y1 " .. S r. IT ('�'.. .+,.' ..y'''"'"..,M ,j+''.. .N...,?.....ri.l nu •.• .r)w....l.i ,M....,,,t.. S.40, S Yu,,,,,.91..4...•... Fw .... w.i F.,:...„.+ 4..F- ,•. 4 ` ', • .Jr •N'4.p �1„11.M4R•, Ri . ,.,. 1,ry � i (1 � 11 � v:,«.Y � 1 � � I�! . + ,qx-J.I. «r a o v •.h � I t. 1! f... X • n Y n .,• r.. ' , . • .1, ... c.4.: ...... .4.34434 w...n ni.L 4,43 ....J ....... I I 1 . • ..t. �.,,,. : w. .,. .• ,.I .A t � i • fs t ,j.Y l= .). ,, i ., _. 1.... ...J. J... r+. .:.A.. .a..,Y }.1. . II I i ' V tY t 4444 .. —...,.»•,'•.^t•t..-, .., 4.:.a.w..qw............h-a.:. •.. , .«..„44,44 , .r 't• + ' i. c. i r ...yu ........ 4..x.4, ..y.+«,a ! b ,r -.»:K.r.'•...w t -•: I n A I,:. :I, , r !Ij .W.r....Mw--.w. ..w,i.ayw..i1 uNt..r. .r,. •. t f.wr'. a •4iy .,Yd,.i1.r rtr'-..,i. .i �.e. I - ). ; '+ '• S I • .1' ,.I . . .... •rx.i.i. •,,,... Wi+........5.,r S�.ra-.• ; -f. Y. ..W....M..w.4.Y..,-..4.—...Jµµ.. nw. I i . 1" I • 1 i.. 4.,•-.w, . w.. 4#044.. Y.µ..........;« .y,.«e Y V � • �.,. # i i 1 1 'f"i"t•, .... i.�l , .�' y. ., e I- tl .,. ..• • 44,4,4 .yr�4-.. _ q r..w...Nr.• r . O 0 I w -. y.l,- ..w.r.X,a. Y.i,i' ..Y.. ,... M P , •• I j I I .khvn r .A..4.,.,I,:Y.WP.»rtNiYi.Y •..11 {"r-`.f�r� 4.+.43..+yr Y Yf1• i .� ��-,? � � ' � I � I � .i'l�w , ..:. M i i' � .. ' N r Y• ... � .. .w1'.w.41.,:.+no-rqr.M+j•w4 N... 0,..1 ,1 r• „ , i - 3♦ . . YN rt.,..'ui•..!.W.4. '..: �,1; .0 • • ,14,;431 , 3y t •` M� 4444 .,�.. „_.. Vii..3444 i.t.i::..i,.....y w..a..i...4.w....,i..A.:....F<i..'.«b.w.+.Y+.+..•iy:..,..•r.•,i-+..mod+...+._ .,,.�, .,., Qb /7 Y Yr�+M.^iy'1 , ', . Jftib A N.+.+.....i.• r,i.wa+..•.,.;+i,y,r..4 rw.iar;i..rk...w.w...•..+: ...•:...».::..0 .,4...r.:wa '.... ... ` O14.4.5`6Y�...rw::-......j.,m +r S ,4444 44,44` , 4444. N t LONG , SSOd 5f INC, 'i '' , N ~tiNU~�1NQ 1 ' , I Ft }..of ,. s...' u..ti it..N t. 1 a .. . ,,, Y 44.4 1 ,•44 4 4 ,. _., d...r t. .447$7►� !rr "'I , «, , Y4 .M �l r'r+'j. ,}. f K ...,wv.'.�, a,..4..•,,....Y..,..;.4.i....,...N,+' N'�r jC^+• Y.?'/ v»s►�., ,,43'34-r`Y«.j, Y �Ir' .R,y6Rh;11',',V,4,��ry .1 �• Y+•� �� if �Ei tN- "di + 1h � 1/ � f ° r 1 '' �,i. f' t�t1I` f .. ". F ' ,li , t,« ,. •:...,. f'.• .; •.5.,4 .' • .• r. rm,, '� 4 i j, i" f '�' YJ..' S 1 i d ' J ,. 1i iiIPAtil,,Vi44►1lia.i.b)l dYt 4!lid U f► 4444',Y , `'4,.,w..a,p'-....StiY+l• �foh�y Y ,4 ,tir «. �'.•..,,M��;h���� 1�W7~Iw�,������� � YS�,r.� tt 4,141 Y i 45 Jfi 5.Y 1 � t.-.3`A'C 4)i X.t r a 1R + �k+I-h.• •.f -.....� y„- '". ,., i• ,... .: .m�r3Mrt:'E.✓JL'Tta7M�Sr4Nt,lv'++'acVS....,e,�*a�••...M.d..WYA,�, :..,. N M+..+.,.�.:......'Y•.v.arr.+.r+�....n,.....ai.•r.•r...• X. ' s.»..wi,,.tw,o-..........Yh.,t1Y,M1+.m..tkai,,.laa •„.,N..,,. a.. ii4i 1 R i Y y h t. k�/ Y /1 w4 f . y.•e• _ ,.M.4, F. �/ry{ ' k 4r • c.,� uP r.14,74,4-,1P1v1....4.14'.. 1"/ ��"/ 4,�.. �,, w . ,..„ , 11 ' I 4,..4 a ,.. d -, Z et t....09-k...4 . Cam.- u__,,,....44..„ -C,' 6:),1"--.:4P.P .,...71.4).e....5..-4L)74.,, * 6,11 L.,4 4-0,--<-ce. -4 6 tp,,--e Z-7, a:4 Al.,,.. , , , ..,.. . ,. 4, 1--c--crie-,' „ . ,. 6,-.k. _.„2„, z..., ..-6„.....,4,„),,,,e (.4 /4 e da .,..r ,...„ -- /44 ....Al....1 4..71 , , , 6-1.4-, cik...? I i.../24-.6.4-1-6e14..)-‘ ' ""iii....A. ....-7,-)--,Z.I., 6....4.7.4...zi.,-, e..A.-.1-4 IT..., . Lpes... , . . , 1 ,. . ' I ficlr" S-,7 (...t. );s2,,,,,,..„_a ., . g ..„,„ .c.. / C■ . , .` y/vV".'1/ �.w. y //. �1 t �«•'�..j \.✓Ve.� pw /�jA( //,/M� , lA r .y ..-/-xt-.0-?.. 4., ir., / pe -Z.d.o..-A- (1.:1,,t_..., 6,i,e..e , .. , . ii--0-1--&-4-11- , 7-( c,, "` 6.e / dertAr/4 VzhAPei-- ,---)-7--e/t-e.--.4e4-,t;e7 I ,,, , a ., .. . 01.,iti, * P„,,..,z5,1.... ,„,, ,,,,,,,,,zz % „ , — 4-- ,...t. 4, Q ,-)..,_ ,..6,), A-144) 6.(it■P” ai./.-p.-..,4# La.,,,,s ----,4. . . 1 F410., .."eety.e. -.....4-14.-.) i --- 644-'1e4"114V)-t•A tl-e-2-1-A-C ' "74 '41:2---Z ir.e...v . , ., ' eu-rr7/4-1 , G,--t --yri.......__ _ --...., S ce-- 141,•611 . "f4W Z:2-e-0-0-'71-s. 74 o-e ,CA-rt 6-6-ve-tru...., ,.....&14, 4- .. 1., -'1" 1.4....,' '—'7 r.A...0.-, a.e. i r . . .. .,,.,. 0..447)-7 #i .... 4 . , :8�t 1 , 6e6.5,64, G /c).-,,X /42ii■Jart4.4.4.. ' yl/ art ,.„---reta,e6..„.. .44.1 , 4(I;:.)/y ,A., . . 417144:dp,i,) A, , , • A` ,t1,4' ,ii-,..„„ 1 ,,,,.., dp--. 4) e ,Zei.„..sc.44..) i , , '1,4,01e 1,,, r %n --celve. ` f4L ' . .: 4 . , tsA)-40 wtIP de.,,tfree A -t-erA-At ---r-r? ' (-4 -' ' _, e—f , -64-4. •-'7,-4.(4A-1. 1,e..4....rvi ' 6.4) , ..„,..,„,, it,4,,,, 4154.,toet tg„aertiloike .„ ,.../.0., 0 IP * e-liA-P, 4,•10,4-*At j �i�_ ,... . (4 ' /4,,,k4--Aedi.L. 1 )17.1 te,5 I---, 4,i • ,\•a W r .Sa "t r / �d 1 ■ k 1 'f "�0 l t .4 . 0V ) i «HI'.;''‘II":" 1 Y 4- 1. ,, a r•� u x 4 r F xw:s,Ya.�x.���. w.-+vYnL�.ublruM• bm^k4w.ra+•,rw-r:,e-,,-..:.. .�.-.. q.µ.yr««rn-v+�. : n • u -_.. 7t/,%,nk�n.Y;EF.•i ,ttr+'MMA a a P^r^r.{."a..'Mw'd'-m<V+`n•P.1+•2•rArv/�pr hGLC" ••• em+q:n 41w.p'a.>+?v:�.all•.,ndr..�erff..rw.+...,..u. "4"'�' .. _...,.._. .. t .. r a.w: N ----__a •' ' Y 1 i l ,) f.f , tr •t 1rY: ti � r a',""''ti R , ' 9 ''4 .:r4?r : 3 r 1.41',,,t,'FF , `., IwZ i,.A4utYypFlf' ,r 1 ■ 1 Y/ `I``_ +i t, - Yr'Irk[• r ♦ M s' I,•4 d" q To .Whom It May Coazcern; !� , i , Dr. , Tigard, r . ' ; We, Phillip and Anita a Edn l 110 SW Ash Dr Ti rd, are ''"' ' ',adamantly opposed to the extension of Ash. Avenue either a ,, Y pp by 'oridge or by intersecting streets from Burnham or Main Streets. ' We de not see any logical or beneficial reasons for anz of the -: . extensions and consider any one of the choices to be a hind$z� oe , , to the residents of the Drive, Village Glenn and nFrew ngh dareasbinregardssto additio'riti, . . 'traffic/ noise, foot traffic and general activity. Such extensions `le believe wool• _ courage people out of those neighborhoods .to take t. a short-cut r the siwntown Tigard area via Ash Avenue .(Example ' ,c.:,''' ''' back road t' J' Co - d from Sattler Rd. to Durham Rd. , via Alderbrook ) t We will do ev: thing within our means to oppose any of these extensions, using petitions, hand outs, new media) etc. • ' .•:'� s C'',/, , , (: 1 Y • Y h , III .. .. ,.y+++yyq..�1{� �y ray . ' e,tcy:;.,-'4,; +...,. I• M) �.. ,...... }milta aa...11 ',,,,z♦� le..11.4 ,ii*.e'4,, ..I•.i Y. ,,,,,+coati;'kMA,,,..:.iftiw°to,'...,1t`u..J•.✓a:r n....„..„ ii...., ,... •...... •'.. f Y' t 1 Y p .,�rl r.r .•, . • . . , • . ., ... ,. • ,„ ,,,t,1,4„,,I.„--,4 I-•,4,..,•••. ,„„ t.,;.; : 0.-,••,.t,- .1-••„,.. - ' ,•• • r, , i.,Q•!•.::•z,••r.,,A,,, t.. ,,, A • • ••',r,111"! )',..;":.*.•' ,‘,, , . • i`, v., . ... '! "'.,,,,,,,‘; • . , ,4TT .,„ . :i . 'SAP, k ) ' 't ,, $' 'fl ,,1 i'..,;,.' i ‘,...,4 . * 4 e,.`.`,Ivt.., '4 A..'—' '''''"" . ... t . , , , 4. , ). ' '. ••• , • „ , .• • ,.. , , . A...., A, .,li'•Irr.4 4,1 , -, A . , \ ,. . , ) , ,,Y'..4 4..1. 4 k 24. 4...,,,,i 0 ‘' ' '*, ,,'..,:o *''.t., . 14 >J4■ ,..4, ,,, %kir*, r ,i t , , 14;1.A„t•(1 f' k• 44 ■ At,,,,,‘;‘,„,! .. 3 "4 '''''''.0,, '' ' t.,",,4, I t ,.r. • ' 414'"i ri.r4r, r o' I ' r,.. ot 1, tr. , 1,..,.,#, ...... ,i,-rw .k . . , .- t,',rt, .,,,,t7;1,,.,.• a .v „,• e1,4A1 •: • - A'1"" ',1 14*t t!t.,r3r'. : ', %,,A. ...0-,A,,,t,,ort #'0,.kli,, ,„) q66.11 4444 • 14\ , 6 4'14;:'%, ';•';l'''•,0,, .• • 4 't k ,..,0 .. , , „ ,,,,,,, . 1.4",,,, „„), ,1,%,...4,,,, ,k, ,. ty' tio■■•• 44. r4,\ v,, ic .,. ,. ,,,. • ,,,,,, „-. . ; r- ''. ,,,4 ',-...■0 ..- t 442,,,,, ' ',/ ,, ,..'ii,,b.k. • 44 ,1 6,1",4 4.0 4,•,,. „ irt'141*•;1!ovr'c',-, , . liN ,04 ',4 ,4 000 '..\+, 'te"'1!Iv 4 f 4,,,,,, y■w,a.',01+ ‘4`.4 '' '. '.' ' i&. "r';',4 t■31;■:OS .%■3 ''' '4",4 t 1 •,..r",.( ,.0.,or,„ •zo, " • •• •, • •1 '''" .Ii. l'(1, 1.1,Ibit t,,,;An j, •4 kA. •,t, . ...,,,k?,I al.:10 ,r40,41),p,'• ' l' ...,13. , . „ 1,,, . .... ,.....,1.• ,4 ;,3:1 .,'' ,/1 •••.•• '.• ' 1!: '• ,4!' , , i it t 4 • fol ''' 1114 P liv`4",.''• 'von " .. ' ''''IC `I!.'' -''. . iy,..,i :,... .,..,t.. .,...,,..., ,.., 1,„... ,, 1?. ....:. : , k ; • e. ish‘,* t n '‘ci,•,.ei:,, ,.,,,; or •' -, 3 ,! „,,,,,, N, ,,4,‘..z 74.,?..7% ,*04 .6}.1 1,1'4.•‘#'''f• ',0, t4r AI':00+ v'...,' ft,'t 'ft 0:-' ,,,,, ,.,,,,, ,,..,, Ati , ..:,.... ''.• •,.!' , *,,'''1*.`g'AVI4N.I.I% . ' • , it ;” 4'. . ,;":1 3tr, -,A, , ,..‘ ,,i'■4,,t; V.:''', . **.4 ',,,A*!; 4'.''''V‘1/4t '.1*'14'''' "tt '‘''' ‘.4:t1A°''''1,:r...., 'a* !■ . ,•'14, ';‘''41.14:4 4)111, Aiii' 1,:,14.,,,•‘4,44Ati •• " ,,• 40' it.:43 •I j ,`, 'c. sr '. ,,, • . 't.4,,, A,,i. .,,,,"••,,.1/44 4 A't..V.0, .•''%.7 t 4;4 ..0 "F`'',+.?,r.*1' It 9 ,' \\ . ■4 ,4 k*,'!,4,,, '4 44'. ..*„.:41/4• fe ,•/•.,■ ttlit, .•1,'..**.;14ii'A. *0 • t A'..! .• , il%.SVit f.' , '',."4.,..,,,'r, - 'i. V "“, ,1',• " • . ' ti5074.1:014 IC ' ''''''''' '''''. ' 4 *t*'‘Ii.V4i11114444''''' '' t .--" ' 1/4\ 1 '' 41°11-4'. ' ' \-rr. 'r, *# • ' ' 4' r. ..„4,,,V4W,,,,,I. , .., 1 ,, ,,,, ' ' , t14,1Pkt , t., , :„,,,, %., , .., , ..','101,,' '.V '.•,,,,"“t*,?!.i to, ,••f."••'1'• tr;"' sp# „ ow .' , i .t. ,, l• ",' . -ut.i ttsq,,, It4,An■,q,.,• . ,,,,,,,r ty, ,..,,, ,,,. ".4, ' i ,„-. ...0. '' ** 0' , ' N,,,. ''' ,'e ' t,•' It'k 4 4"'*A "VV. ,14`1'4,1' `,..,,,.01'41' '.''741 , :I ' -ft ...J... .e,0.:lifv. ,-i,;?0,;,' ,Y,', e •' ''." ' i , 7i• ,h,LA,.„....,* ‘, ,,,..• , ., 1 , ,•,,,,, . , 1,,•,, %,, ,. .„ ,,,' .4,, • .i 0 + •• f ■ ., „ N ',' -. , :iv t-. 4. ,0,0 r i. . 3t!,Oti is 4..tv,t.,„ . ,•••• , . , .. 1 , ,k61,3,,,ky\k‘..1.,,,..,,14, *. .0,.,,,. .,• ,,,,,,,,.., ,, ,.% „wk.. „ :, ,,...., ,,,,,,- , - s; ,.......,,,,.; ,,„..,,,, , ..,.. , 4,46 ity,• , • ,••••• A ...,t A ' • 4.,,,. )r.' '14k' '...1 ••6''4 4 !I$i'' '•,6.) •,t; 041..r.• 'WkIt.4tic?,164,"'t 4.04 t,• ,...• ,.... .r.'• '• , , ... 6 ■ I . ' *I' - . 1 •'' 1 . • r "•#••.,, ..• It 4., -..., , ,.•'..;10.- ..`,. . ..1,. •.'w,72,t .4 .tts,e„c.,1,:•‘1.,..14,'A 1,, --- k 0. f,..,4 ,, ,.,,.. „„. . 4 4, - ,, , 2. ,, ,,„ , ,. •, , ,...... . . ,t, ...., , . ,...• f,■I‘ •'P • ,,...t•,7,'I, ., k7k lif, ' , . 6;,,, , . .... ., ,,, ;„•' ••,,, ,,, , \; ,,,,. „ ,,,,,,,, . •.:0,:',41.;tr,V,•':,..."41',li Aud f '`, '''' ' Ak.• ti',,' ”' * * ti A ' ' .Iiii.‘ “. 'V'',4)rit'4 '.'„••,3 1.43."t, .l‘r.:.te "'c:4 ,,,, , •t• • 4 Pr'"" No...-- Ir ' •‘, ' t..,. - ''-. . •• , , •1 to' '‘.! ., ',..4" . ,1 k . 7 f`. •,.:Agrt.r I'ON',in\t . ' '•.111., '' , -... • '..'"t .r 1 :,d' ' • '1,r V, 0 o, . •',I,'Vt,d'to.;■41,1''I;41",%.!I.'t:'1/41 t ,7 r'''' CPIt0 ,- ,„ . ' F.',1*.t,,,'1:,,ii," . 11:1‘PitiN)4.;00 ttf IV , 4 ,d.'• f' -I- ' -,40 411` ' , ..,..% ,, .,,,.. , t,, 3, 4„ ,,•■,,,, , ,,t .4, . '' h-Vt„:■, 4$ , ',.."' ;iLtP/At',01\4.1' t? ' ., , .., , pi.,, '", • '',/",, 1.;',A';',$.- ,."' '•.,)•■, ''I ., 41•'''T t' t 4.1',4,4'4'1, l', • ,/;; ,1 , „I' ' .1;•.,, 74,N,ti :11,%:.kqq,'•nt; (4. ' ..: lr' t -,:v . . 1,, ,',1 .."1:4,i '■r''' '•'‘',11 i' '- A 1 .1.''''' .•' ' i '•- kw, ,, lk,,,,,',1'`,,*1 • - ' t , 1 e." ',- l' •" '•'WO '14 ,, 0,;., ,,,, ,,, V , • ,, 1... r .o .Viptli4 1,Iii•,•,I.di:*41,‘ I. ,i 6 ,O. $' , .40- 7 • '- ," .'*' " ' ' tr. , .,. ' ..'.....g... i . . , . ' . • 7',>4..7.1,414 w`.1.44•-';',. ,t/71'' ',,' Mo, ''•'' ' #' .. ; 6 r` t , ,.. iik•' .. , . , . "1 jp, 't 0•..• * '''••••-•'• ' : ,•..,:,,,,4,, , „r,ri,...:,: ::...,,,,..-:;t.,.:,.■,,,,,,:,i,:.4,,,,, ,,,,1/4"-:),,,,,,i,,, - 't , At„. .3,. .„ ',. , V t44.4.11.••'''ti\'' . '/'. '. ' ! ' , . 144. 14"• ,, ,, ,.,.,,,„ c's*0.1 b •,„., , ‘ .:,, . I, „„:„..„• . ..,.......„,.. ;: . , • ,. ,, ,. t. 0 . . , ,,, , ..• e) . }t I 4ty. .,, 1 ,:t •. .... ,,, I'n . , ,,,,...,;4, `1.'•'', 1 t 4 1' ■,.. . r"1 ii . .41* "' * •", ' .1 ` .,;' •, 14 tt, ,— 0 4 . t f •'4,', , 7'. ' ''''...\'-.. A • Iti., ,4,.,,;1„ :i.,i .„ v, ,, ,, ,, , 0 n,,,..,, ;#,, .1, .., r . , .,...,, .;,,, • , , .,,,o•..•. . • ,..,,,, • ,, 4 ,,,. ,a,„,,,,, ,,, ,; ;I it; 1. ,A . .. , .,,,. , ,t. . , ,,° t'C‘4.; t.,,,,i* , 0 , ,,, ,,, . . . 0, 1 ,ili,,,,. jo..,41,., ;sT,t:v ,1,,,,A1°4t7;t• ■ st•'k. , 4',....t t ji• .:.. ,e.,,.„. '''' ' . . . • -0i .11.,'IT''': ,A.l' . 4, '' . .,,, "le1.' '' '1 ,,, ' „ #, ,I 1,,:,, • .14 ,„, tk• , 4,*1410 \kit4 1 i:V 11.,.4 44..i. • . . .'t.',4,..P1°•k,.,i."1,•;',' •4'''''' ,. •"' .. 14).." ,1* - •-'' , . ,,A,,1,rN,±ir. ..,0., ,1 0 ii 13„y„,,;,,,',',.;•:.„"4„.0 31,, ',•if 04:44102' 'i 1 ' . .•. , V...'''..,, ' * . t .i ..."■•,l''I '' 4. ,,,, 4 1•••:',71.1',..,,:•i,,‘,, ',),,*fi; '''' - ,,,,,-•, 'ma I „4 '4 ' t3,'*#"*")..t',\' ' I 'ho■4' ,1'"I''llilto li,50e'V.111#,:1 ,„a.,, , . . ,;„,.,.,, .•• ., „„, ttA.4 4.,•• I 1 „ l I ,c1 t " f 4 i.t,,,t30 )i 0..::.. 41„ • 1,, ..d 1 ,„, ,,,v i,, tAt.',- . . 1 "• ..i. : ,4. ,.4,,,.'.. ' 4 ,.. ;I,„.4,.'„ ,„ '. 4 be 4.1.' ;‘, ,,'4,.4/'' 1. ° -,.. ' '., .1.‘. . /40,, t,,,A„,'.'.,,,. 41:,,,°*.,, ,,, '' . ,, • „ '.,:',,,,,AA,••?1,b'',AP,:4,‘ 9,',.‘ 1..,„...,,,A t , i.. • ,e - 6 , .„. ,,-1 . • , . „. . • ,.,, , .f.i`:.'' ', , ; ,,, ,, . $ „. „,, • 1. }4 , • 0 t rMithii ' I k„,.,,,,,0 , • ,11`A-4 f , i 4 ,i'yv, ..,.:L., 4 ,,, s, ,., 1: •:!':',; ,.#111P • ' . '' -• - , 0 .., . ,, * ,t ,, „ ,•. t•.; t'‘ * ..,'• 6 1, „ r , , ,V, il .4 tiftlt4)".1 '011b. k-*''. '—' ' 4o.ctk . 4.. '" 00 i ... 0' ..'' ''.' ,,. -•'. r . = • 4 I 10 ; . 1 ' 7 f`" I 031„' , , k* 4 1/ ,144111"le 444 0 30j ii‘.'f'1'.'.. . ' 0,3 t , • rA'tc4' 4'4.1k*'', 0..4'\ i , , ,• i . . . . . . 07.,, ... t °',''1',r)1•OMNilit .1 .--,,,, .01,, OW° .4 lik.30,.,, • . , . ., ..14. 4 , s. rittir6)1, ,„ figy, ,.1 . ,,,,,,,1,:, • g" Ab 4 ti.N4,4 t,',4. ,,,Ir...0,,it'' t rt...,,,,,,, , 4,. x: ig . • ,•. , 1 • '10 . vit - "' - ' i‘ ,'8 "; ,i, , ,i• ,.. ,*40. - '' . , li ' •ilk , . .INIK ' 4 , ,t,'.. ,,.. ,,. , ,:::''',.,.i AI •(,+ts . ' eh— 4* • A L '•''''1." '444, ,'''',1."'.,i-.''''. " ' t , . 0..:,,,,,.......7,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,, , ,,,,, ,,:i7, ..,,,. 4.. , .11, ,„,„,--4 ,,rd •:,:„ ; :..•'''„':::V„ t# ''''''',''41 #''‘ t 4-■I:,- *. ,..'I., ' 1 '14 ' 41e\' '..'1,; ,..jr - ,. rtrt'':'4.7:7r (''',.., 4,,,,'t 1,A,,,,,,r.■,,,... ,,,, ., ,,,f,•';,..... ..i ' .4,,,,,■,epr,,!:1":.' . .''. 6.):!.4...,„ .,v , tf• . „,,,,,,, . t ''‘ ,, •." at" -"'' ' , * *.4,'- 1." r.k "* ..)....s.441 ,.41(.1 A'3 I: rri.' Id**'4IlIo1/4**rt't iI1ttIlt''' ..411V,r•S; •... 2., .4.7` ' -•=1,,.''''“ ** = t "t ;%.9,41,:44% I4$ 11, 14911fit.,...'e • ... .,,o. , ,• , de1,1 ' ,„ Cr* lYi ' Jim:-.\,T s ,. .,-, , 4.. 1.0= . d% `''' t"•!Lk:.4 ISO t„?.,ltrkf ' rit'Itttk;*d ,„.,*•,'-'-' "' '''.`V * * t 'I",, 3 „ ' '.`4‘C';'SiTt t,I•c''ri'" %Tv; .,'. , ', ■ '', ,.'te i , • • i - ,,, i . " ' ,•,, •: . st . • ,, •:".4.1„4 . • ,. ,1, °, k r 1 te'r, ,„\. • 1 hi;.,4,,,,a ,t, , ,.N4 01' ,,I ` '*°*lit .' ,,,.. "1 • • ' #. Or '''' -',I. o, !" *.4 4 ' 4 OP 4. 4•' ,*it ■ l''' .*',,f do.:1 kti A, `.NV,r) ,N111,r`11.04 . . ' ° .. . ., .i .. , A•t,A, ', ,,,,, t. ,t .. ' t i*:Ai'•,7.".'t -•1"t• '. I i : ,t.,,, , .. -- 1 ,•. . 1 , 4 , ,r4'. ' • 1 , 1•••••'61 •V:7" 40 l''''it,le`k4iiii,....,I•4,Ilt„ttr ,Ito, ' 1-4' r,r) ,,..t..6 Av+,1 'V 11:,•,,,....;43 (41, A '.* ". 1, `1.,"(4tt'4tr** t'o.t'''" ' * t • \'''')tf'.'.,k ..ti,#‘*ir\1144:4i,:4,1;t".1:o 44t'. , ' , 4 ,,# 4!•'.. 'v„Ilki,..,t4 7 i.„14.!\ ' i 'a: ' i te,'',' '' urer, .. .• ,,„"t "r I" c t I , II. k oil 3 3 ..,.`,„' 40 . ,•., . ,„• , •i• ,4 y.„1 ,,,. 11.1 ;-',•,'"„;■,',i,p,*., „,, , ,',. 4,1,1 4 ,■4, ..:,, • 7i.60 ,', , 4 it ' ,i'.,"t,, /' \ 1 i ,, , , .,... - , • ely,k. i 1 . . ,., . . " . ,tfit- ,,A..1,' 1- .1 ,,..A.. t . .,.4".. 4krvoll.°41tiii,■tvir,,, '• 'il• -. I„ ,°•.1'',‘. 4`, ,,1,• ,•. ' i • i, ,, .„•.‘'« • „.... ,. .1,.., ,, ) ..• ,„lx,„.4 A,,,, , . ‘•'II. 4,•'\.1 yiiv:;•, 4., 'or, , ,,,„4 ,,, ,, e 0- y , . , •, ..,.4 1 ,. • 4 4 I i ,PI',1 ko`41 4., A +SO' • • % 14t' I Aor 't:‘ y tis,t,t t.4 k$,,i$i vb.*,t,,” i.it‘1/4 #1#,"0„.„ ,„o,„ , ' 1 i 3 4‘.1*'' r,et 'A l',;,4441v., ,;','..t v.,e/.. , •‘ , , , , . . , = *1; ,• ,i {..,k o , %; ,,,,, ,, 't 1,,ir 4q, ,,1%,0■,.1/4 , 't t ' ,,,r,4,,,,i,.......4' IL*Sti.141i,. *At t'irissi'4114/ ''‘s18 ert lileti)k",t k':," 4!"•1'-'"'' ',I .'. i ,,.".‘4,',,,,, tt, Ort '41Itt'1,, I ' 4*.trA.`i," ,\A at Ato. .‘,...,,,,,,,tit I , ,dt.,*2 -rto.t iA1'`',•,‘,A,'', rt„Or'.. ,,,,, t,„ 4,,,E,44,..j,,,ti ti ki,:',01,?.53r1,-. ,..,,,...i.,,.,,,,,... 0 t 0,0(0 ,,Atf i, tt'..11,,, t."1.4•1 t. ‘k)litt,A%,:,,''1„i''.*q •,'..'k '••'''' ilqii4S4(46°A'in"' ''" '-''''— • . 0** P'•:." ' -u.oyabh ,t., '' .,,,,„„, • •• �, ■I�Rrne�®Illl • ,. ;C.� vf,v"l:�i� It an�!`it'i•��bpi,•1�'1{`1...'�tiW •v'r `, r •, u, 1obl,frSr 7. + 7 .' t �'"S>•1rj4T+,{,r{!'} .4"i ✓R �t. �1 M. :,r � r '�s4q+,fit'1��'N k'�+� IRr‘lr A1 f ,i.,4.A r ,e.J :'.'.. ,., " r• �{ ( i;t r t hi.r, r Sn.,. r y, r '.Al.'Zs�'r.'p A.,(��,<l�! , yQ i}> n �Id' r.. � t >i,, 'i11Fr�yt},1 Qrrb r o, tt / 4"f" w A f 1`) off+.,.14 s,` '' r r � ,.� ,n�h+a 1 y , J , r 7,•w ku�, 1 ° • ,'I'f� 1'.5,1,tr'f^1,t"t<' ''', 1,'v'1 14 "l rH r' 14 11` ,,1 ' ' ..",ifrQ 7,0:11,1 a4'1..,4 ! . . . i , A . ,O. titti ' ,,,"'t '*.,',-,'4. ' ,','1 f•F F 7� r�' !r M r' t/1y r 7 k ■J r, J I y •�N/1 1 'lil,r(S w :1rr ''+t;r,,,l ...•l,� M.. I.. r r. •1 tall 41,• ,u • 1 i'�,Jr•!r! M A, X11?{�'•�l / l J f, . , e ,j;i, ,,.f4+<.r. f.1/ ``,,,*t Iak" 1t1Vt t1�i1Ma► 9! y I Hm: :!t )� . 11 , } �.y v rA »`-► ,, , .:tti,, 1. - , i^ kC1i',1 ir. ,i 7 . ,,1 } >,.•,: TM n') . i• F `b� :f �I 1 r 1 0'I t ,4' 1,1.:. ,V' m',il, ♦1 1 3' ,Ir •«+,}{)`�� t t,'d'! I,J �i`!,,{ ,''r4%..'�ir,i 1'^r'' 'f,((P' 6� 41!'i;� r :. l--;i1.� N r rr,Ii`I d,r+�''r'It�r"�v r r � j Y 1, 1�1� .ti,n^` 4f�� , 1p Sf i ,. , �• b. .t ,,1y1 �r,„ 1• 1 '„,,, ,, r',Y.1l,l,,..,,' `V•I S h "t` �' a:•4� ::7 1 Ilt, "Y'Jli b....„A;”,I1� ,.1#� ' M+1} 7 ••'� � �''. ' ;rr-A•,, .Ib'�.4#,7 , , ��1 •y�•a.. i"1�' ,.,. fiyr.4... t,.. 1 ,, /„k Li'1 �. lIAA, "I,� , 1�ir��' A ' r .C� /l"11.1,! t` .,r f' t "' 1 ,`: ` } w ' , N1 i s ' j,� l:',11.i`''�,X ? ,1 i '',1 1"'§�1 •t ! 1 Y} r r 1'M ,, ,,'f ! 5 ,}1' , ,r+•. 1 r 1 ,' ,� r p b� 1 t, 8 P ,� r„ 1. .��j �,, � ,E! •' ! �', ..,- .�+,.. �t l` !t dGb.N. t' >; 'r,�i l��l 4. 1., lr rv-. 1,r-y r''�, �a/, A r',, IR��`" •�,. r ., '''+41W •, .MI, In �, �Iy"" 1 .,,. ,s y�.`, �.4.,,,Y K 't 1 r. ,.i_ J���iri1�q ,1 p '/° y�r�. �:y,� `1e•K' t�rY Ir ,� ,,�•,F + 'r:� �,�,.;U►'�"1,KYih`i iN.+y r �•,t a�p 1 .` y+�I`W ,1, .�. _".i 1 i.« .. /py�l`+J*'1�, •Jr, Y vLB ' It A'A ,n 1 4. .I,.r »'. 1' 5 C Y4�.�Stt,°5 1 * , y i C ri ,, p , 1 It �jy ; l ,1 yici1s,.' es,Ifi `�"„',.', i'” ; ', , ,w.t ,:',, I J.1 I ] 1,1. "t V.,. 1•'h ., ,J44. y r4 • I'. 1 �. Ii' jg• !'7,11 r' ,,„ ♦•.„v ,I•^ iL... j, -,°,,,a, •'�Ud+'+ r.• ., '.J.l. ♦,” ( ' I t • 1•+ i a op:I 11 A �,•zy1:C11v ''ri i F4 „1 I ' � r i t t :'°'' 1•.} 1 -a' i I .. ,Ir • '� I,g.7 ! +' + yrr,. :�r a , , ' �1, wn. j Y '',4, ,,IA twat fl y. I I, 1,I, 'ii.',(- 'd'!' �,• �ti41��1�h(,, 11' ��jg��"�1'�; t,y,. i Y y�a� r1 Y, ,�, �} ���. �� a,��, 1 A�d �.'.:1.,.,,,',,• ay'� 4��11 11r +nab���' ' p,i 1 ! tar ' ♦�1.n r' i Eck.Ir''• . ,;t�; e`+,C p •' v1 1` , i•4. `.r! (1. ,y,, r/t'I,fkGt�� '"` �lr�f ,s�' r'A�� ,,.',. TE. yra;. Ct •;,� �s r � 19 e',if,t.,j. 'F Si ,71 �'/ 1'�� A { ,,� i �" ?. 4 a:'+.!, aq .w+.,,a ,mow, nu, N ��i !' , , /' r ,+;,�1'•+ f ,t;1Kr!•!ky1'1 .p ,1'f�.ij, ..r l ' y,. t,+.:,I , +v.,ka1,,,,*•W114., *LA. ',."`.,a,` p016' ,r ' ''.1, ''''''I t,+: r + is ,'•Out;",f-,.•t•t..i':•r J;';it..I., !` fr'r?1'YI11, N• 1.�� /'y{+ t b li i ►,�,i ).4:1,.,',1"'7,::',.'14''''''': r ' '' �it4 , . t! 1 '' , ., .. Y n+•«il! ...'' 1:." , r1 Y x.1 ' , ,,,L I/, 1 r. r"n,,.»^ :•1. '+ 1 D,}4;«,'1;•l',4 k l,l,ir "J ;�"t1th ;�a� 1 ,1'lt �4 r•r ,..ac d`.rt. b' "� "! q g l q1t� Y,` ,',' ���1 I r ° e�1 4 '' 4' 'M' NI •.,lbn 4.'11 -1 '*b."1).4'''.' . .'1 w , 1''"S'� 1•;f 1P,",1'',k°"i r".p 44,,' . , 1 ' , J., • , J , ,l , t t • w. . r-.y:n-.a Mp,nM.;a t e,fxx+rvy.+ '.> ,.: ,».r,., .._<.,w-..w M.,...-......++wm,,.e.+•-»+•.Ar+k•,a ra"p, Ecwaatcm:r+...14..•.V•.xr..w.+-w14' V , , - 1 - _ *ofr.taN* gwp $01 1. [fi 11 REJRfil. PRt I1R aG� nrirrup y� P,0. BOX 127 • TUALATIN, OREGON 97062 • PHONE 682.2601 • RUSSELL WASHBURN, CHIEF April 17, 1980 Planning Department City of Tigard h: City Hall ' Tigard, Oregon 97223 ,, Attention: Aldie Howard, Planner Re; Changes in Main St, Johnson, and Ash Street, downtown Tigard Dear Mr, Howard: I have discussed the proposed street changes for downtown Tigard With the entire staff of Tualatin Fire District. Tualatin Fire District would go on record to support the proposed downtown street realignment plan as shown in the drawing that is attached to this letter (drawing not to scale) . There are several items that need careful consideration for implementation of this street redesign to prevent hardship on the fire department: 1 , Where Main Street will be realigned into Johnson Street, if.a traffic light i s installed `a provision for Opticom traffic light control should be required, and be provided by the developer. 2, The realignment of Main Street will create an additional 900 corner • negotiate proceeding southbound for the fire department to ne ot�ate before rocee important through street �.:� d . needs to be on 991 } an i m ortant throu h street to be used i n fire department repo At this corner a sweeping right-hand turn created response. ow• fire department to negotiate the corner without the necessity of coping to a complete stop and starting up. , 3 �headditional ��nno Creek crossing, by extending Ash Street through o Burnham Street, would allow fire department an additional way to respond into the area of Ash and all these streets to the south of there that intersect with Ash. As an additional method to make this street crossing even more valuable for the fire department, it would be asked that the study include extending Ash Street to connect Burn- ham and Commercial Streets, This would give department great s i � i _ station the fire de flexisibility from the existing s at;on to get to a considerable area that is between Hall and 99W, south of Fanno Creek and response times could be greatly reduced for fire apparatus in this area. , .�.,n..,...., m ,x„r:+,.., ....,,a .. ,...i.:v + e+, .. ..y...._.: �.. y. ,:.rar+r:*....ttr^-t nx4�;ctd6MWu;a ao-......w» u,•,..yr,u.11F • , :' 1 .. n � . sessions with the developer are . scheduled,any planning meet ,,gs or further If input. '; representative of Tualatin Fire District ;; for eour efeel The eMain�Street: street-circulation plan' is vitally impor- tant tant to the fire district because of the location of fire station that serves the entire area which is located almost directly' in the center All responses fYom that station must occur some- of the downtown area. '° t where through the downtown street system, Thank you for asking for our input into this matter. Yours truly a /. `• J ph A creul i ch Battalion Chief/Deputy Fire.Marshal JAc;dm • • • • • ti w ow•. .., ,v. n•r ew,.. y..+. rl•y.._ ..w,.n.1. 4 ......, ..»wrw. A1140.6J.4 N "":' 'Wt"i. 4 — ___ ■?r u , 0........ . -•<"^ , c • I : ' � 1 41, , . F .._. N r. \\ ''''.k. , , .. , 1 ,... 1 1 :.r..,, \ , ..r ,, \ I ti 4.� .1 fY t.SV`} r \ -('' , , c a \i. ....h.,...5 , el.,) R,,. . ...,, _ii , ...,._. , „ J ,w.rn.Y�.4Y,. ...,.m a«r•.,......,r:r•.. ._.-..: ,r.r,..,{w.,w.-ro..-rt ao r. r��xieanhw#aH7i"•�«e4,=�!'.�Y.i•r'•am-'+'reMC,sa..reap.a�+.»,».T:.u'.:.-+�..-W,.,,' - .. .. . . k \k,,‘ .... A . ' PUBLIC NOTICE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION F.. April 22, iJ80,70 p.rxa. j 4 AFFIDA�°'a 1 OF PUBLICATION .. Fowler Junior High ' DOUBLE NtATI! ROOM 10865 SW Walnut Street,Tigard STATE OF OREGON, , Public Hearings COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, se, Y 1 'ZONE CHAS ,'E, ZC -so �. ' CONDITIONAL USL, CU 5-80 (Larry v Leahy) NFO No. 2 I Joseph Scha ex A request by Larry Leahy .., for a Zone• Change from Washington County being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the publisher . _. . ..,....�:w RU-4 to City 4f Tigard Comprehensive Plan Zone Designation A.12 Mu l > + .....:..:....of. The Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined tifarrrily" Zone and; A request for a Conditional Use for by ORS 193,010 and 193.020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and professional offices in an A-12 "Mul- "Zone as allowed in the Tigard state; that the legal notice, a trfamlly Y •• . printed. copy of which is hereto annexed) was 1�liunictpal Cade Section 18.29�.OZ0 both located fronting approximately 220 , published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ..,...2,..,_,-.. .,.,. successive and feet on the east side of Cireenburg Road and 250' feet north of Dakota 1 consecutive weeks in the following issues ...,:.:,...::....:. (Wash. CoY Map IS1 35B ......:.,. Tax Ma .......:.:......,., :.,,. .,..Y...,:w Tax Lots 700 and 800). ..... ..,Y,.,, r. . r... 7,1� 1,98 5:2 ZONE N •. �, F G1=iANG1~ PLANNED" DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPD .,...,:...,. _: ... . ., :MCondominiums)(S,i u e) 9-80 (Park Place NPD A request by Joseph. iniums for a Stibscribed and sworn to before me this ........w•.::..1.6.: h..:,...._:.:day of Zone Change from R-7 "Sm81e Family Residential" to A-20Pt� "Multifamily ' � 19,$01 Planned Development District" (con- ..,., Apr ,�....... domniu�xts) which is in keeping vVith ,/ r - Comprehensive Plan Designa.tior� . the Comp 0.0 SW A' . :�..: ...,....., ,. Notary Public of t. 119. 98th Venue . .Y ..., .. ..... locate + Oregon d a at.MVtap 1S1 35CD, Tait , (Wash Co. T Lots 2200 and 2300). PLANNED 1Vty commission expires .. "aMM SSION 1 XPiRES 5.3 ZONE CHANGE 80 Summerfield Phase XI V) NPD Fi < . 'lfi, 1J82 Do VELOPMENT DISTRICT, ZCPO ....-,:,_ .... .,. .. .- .,„. ..,. ..M-. ...... .....y.., •a,. .-.. ..r..N , �. . � .No . . �, request by RaymOnd Bartel and Ttialattn Development Company+for a Planning Commission review of Phase . fourteen (14) in SUrt erfteld, Project _ . A-138 Condomtnixnttm Units, Project B-11 Single Family Units, and Project, BaIahce DUe site located at � 27.65 C �- �uturtr housing ash, rrfietd Drive (Wash, 109th and `aummPr Co, Tax Map 2S1 10DD►,Tax,Lbt 100 PLEASE PAY PROM THIS INVOICE 251 10D, Tax Lots 1100 and Tax Map and 2000), c 5;4 CONDITIONAL USE, CU 4.80 A SERVICE CHARGE of I h%per month(which is an ANNUAL RATE of 18%) (The Robert Randall Company) NPO ++Viii be charged on Paso Due�4ccounts No, 1 , request by Thomas J.Edmonds for A req . a Conditin,nai Use in an. V.”"Indus trlat �Park"" Zone for outside torage. as allowed in the Tigard Customer Copy Munlclpal Code Section 18,52,020, Also s use of floodptatn Brea fos requesting torage located at 830q Sf AV outside�. , , Burnham (Wash, Co, Tax Map 251 2DB" Tax.Lot 200 and. Tax Map 2S1 ' 2 Lot 2200), . ,5. . ICE CHANGE PLANNED i ZCP> , �LOPN1E1V1. DISTRICT, . , 6.80(I,B,Bishop/G.1,,Ioes)NPC NO,1, A request by J,. B, Bishop arid, H. J, Bttehhelz of Main Street Development, Ltd for a Zone Change from C43M' *r "Main Street Cctmrrtercial'► to C=81v1PD "Main t Commercial, Planned 11�. ain 5tree for , Development District" Zone approximately ately 11,51 acres located on t,i the southern end of Main Street �, (Wash, Co, Tax Map 251 2AC, Tax ?t Lots 1600, 1500, 2200, 1400; 1300, 1200 ,; and a,portion of 200 parcel No, 4), � i 9 1 8 ('1�T 4/V-- Publish April 94 0) 61 ws v, .r 9j .-.,...,.,,.,',..,,,,„„„,,, ...,....,,,,,,-,..,.....----...,-----.,--- .. F,v •'' I 1 ., .. k „„,, ..„,. 411. 111, lie■ Ilk IL Ilk it % II iii,„ ,,,,, I 4 41 WAREMART 4 A t ‘ , ii f WAREMART, INC, P. 0. BOX $756 .0; (2081 345.4298 BOISE, IDAHO 83705 e., • April 14, 1980 , Mr. J. B. Bishop 10505 S. W. Barbur Blvd. 1 Suite. 303 ' 1 • Portland, Oregon 97219 } Re: Main Street Development ' Tigard, Or. 1 Dear Mr. Bishop: . 1 1 1 .. "I I site to thank you for the inforrnation.you sent me regarding Waremart's ,-; proposed site in Tigard, Oregon. I hope everything is progressing well, as : we are very anxious to get started on construction. The following is information . you requested: 9 A. Store hours, 8:00 AM to 11 :00 PM - 7days per week. •.1 B. Customer count - 15,000 per week, C. Heavy Traffic Hours: 10:30AM to Noon • .,,I 3:30PM to 7:00PM • .• D. Customer travel distance - It has been our experience that Waremart Will draw customers from a distance of 25 miles. E. This store Will employee 50 to 55 peOple. . . Waremart is presently operating a 60,000 sq. foot distribution center in Tigard, Oregon that employees 22 people, and services our stores in O-egon, Washington and Idaho. , ; ?.1 If you need any additional information please call me. Sincere)y, i "--- ,4,7" . Robert T. Richins . Vice President, Properties * IITR/mn ) . . ., , f. Ip • • of k AFF/DAVIT OF MAILING k STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. } City of Tigard ) • , If Viola Christensen, being first duly scorn, on oath despose and say: That I am Secretary for the Planning Department for , the City of Tigard, Oregon That I served notice of hearing of the Tigard Planning Commission of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each of the • j, following named persons on the day of . he® Lgg them at the address shoran on the at ac c by nailing to each of. th list (Marked Exhibit B) , said notice as hereto attached, deposited in • the United States Mil on the ,,"_ day of ' 1980 , postage prepaid. . —_,,.....„) 6,,„/ L..' 7 („0 . , , } r ' S ubscr bed and sworn to bdlfore me on the day of 198 r I l . k . Notary Public of Oregon ii. "e My Comr..ssion expires:° ._._`C)t4 ,,4,.,_,,_ . . i • 1 (+ Y • ti, • ,...,w,., .+ ,-:.: ., ,..Ww......",..4.• .,ywl4wwaw H,,,,h,.0 ..ae,sw ... ., ,-.�..,....-...„. .w..y...:u+wA^S:IMMEmWW, „-- Y td;,RJ' ti' , s 1 Rt . 1 c E,0 F PU * LIC HEAING ( NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING CO ISSION T 'T pMETING ON TUESDAY, . , . APRIL 22, 1980 , AT 7:30 P.M., IN THE f' FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH , ,`' SCHOOL, 10865 S.W. WALNUT, TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: ,B APPLICANT: MAIN STREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD. OWNER: J. B. Bishop and 10505 SW Barbur Blvd., Suite 303 H. I.T. Buchholz • Portland, Oregon 97219 • SAME ADDRESS SAME ' I. REQUEST: For a Zone Change from C--3M "Main Street Commercial" to C-3MPD "Main Street Commercial Planned Development District" Zone for I. approximately 11.51 acres. LOCATION: Southern end of Main Street (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2AC, Tax Lots 1600, 1500, 2200, 1400, 1300, 1200 and a portion of 200 parcel #3) f' • ' FILE NO.: ' `LCPD 6-80 NPO 41 �T_t t��.. 1' .• , (........„..tic *.w. ,, ............._ ‘ c______ 9 1 _A' e / L, m 8 ,1'.01 < y w PFAFPLE 4T, S "''4 ,Yi TbN '« w ` r Mfg R . 7. Iv'�G IAR°, m a r 5W. FaG` �...:_7 aEET GRIV P^- EC'1 :r: ,4 u•[ ii W i ° N LEW19 H 6w.L' ,.W�" i ry «I! �1\ LNSW UkG£LA - 0, �,t DUVALL ST,' � ."Cb ''�� I ! Sw.04ArlIERd ! ,c}r 11tADGY1 \\\ ! (� I rT' !i! ' aT yl .; �µ •, nPp i ♦ '+ °= l i R f y d ..A '•a .4 ... 4 +16 `\ �1 DART, 8 6. µ ttT L t t .a.6 ,'LAC CT, .' Llt ' aM.OM aT, i' r1ALNU {T, -. 141 '4 it 9t `11ay .a w + 1.1. yL.•. �1 CR awS t ee*r .i,`��," ♦t ,y,} -t _.,i r'ero N 40,10 Ar i �.�' t{tat G ..,.,.,., � W' �,-�5 � � � F �'PL � 9T, ,. 6r..,�RRDL a'•�� V• �4t,t .4 4 t tw //1 I ti g *ti ' : q r� MA � • CARpEM ST. ,a7.. �, 04 N6 , .ip• .. 1.4 . �* ., I Ii ,. rA,T.. aW MSS �;1 r , .,T. „w oh E” ...v sT- g nti aw < M1. ~�"F c-t `a.�.4'' , �$ iJ7 /J §wst VAMS $1-1 4 ,T. At v .././ OW. Ahlt� -.J Y.4,y,Vd a; i • 1r 6 T 4/ L r o. 11111r// • .. ` 1 � t� r°! �` la? N. R ., e,�i�,il'` ,t k 4 oc}ur � aT.'S-�i „ y IH,FUL i w a 4 t, {✓' R , r,�I, aW. ':.ka i N + n IW. �'ruaHtVE� ...T: .., a 0'0 ,'a.:, 'ra.. ., .L.,_,, ' /. ,W, w: / • CHERRY r 5t gW 1 II 1I x OT y 'tf p.„,, y{” aW+ rOaeWG.• i r`L J s.NSiu `¢ (AWHAVEN 'N� Lt h}. �t µ ... s. a ''.3,,, bA - ° IEWI+DU a -,. 04 Nnlvlew ,s ., a t, ,,`� .. ,n / t.',71 A/ 1 P TI 1 Q''' a . � ® ,,;.111.bCT• a 1 4 µ . p 4 d,rt":2z LLpG�, -�- IL.F f a al ),/1p B. , �1 1N t. RA+, ar.iiw�riaL"'S�0 p THE PUBLIC HEARING ON trHIS MATTEi WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITS THE RULBS OF PROCEDURES OF TH1; PLANNING COMMISSION. ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER MAY ATTEND AND BE N8ARD, OR, TESTIMONY MAY BE SUBMITTED IN W'NITINd TO BE ENTERED INTO T88 RECORD OE TH8 INITIAL HEARING. .' SEOULD YOU WISI# TO APPEAL, A WRITTEN LETTER ADDRESSED TC) THE CITY RECORDER MUST 88 RECEIVED PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION CP THE TWENTI4TH DAY AFTER THE DECISION OF THE H8ARING. IF NOTICE :. TO APPEAL IS NOT RECEIVED WITHIN TWENTY DAYS; THE ACTION IS VALID! FO t T it vLA 1O DEPARTMENT AT 639-4171 0YT1 2420 SN' Main R FURTHER �N'FpRMATION, �L`.�aSE tONxA�T tit ...1. G Tigard, Oregon 9723 , 1 I a 7 .� M.�>_ - 100.1 on �- -1-1-1-6,--H-'4 f � v i/O+a�'``` 1 13 Y S°i31 1Y * 1 j r .u7 W �y�1 1 1�8� �K .. B,3 A x r-, 4-0-J 6,t A^_, b Q� r � ? pc' rn .• p w z , J 4 r N A C'C. te., � t i n a n 0 Will' 1pq Vp tir '� '�I. ' � 7I tiM1S 30 E r �s d i P 1 i a o h:r I 3 �u� Naaa.tJ g rS a 1328p " :' I�19�.NK M t i �' atd �^ r I j°a 9 .9E I�{rt A� ' ar ,-! t. , -.;r:,"1,---- taw.H `y 1� s '/� 1 l all U • t.; cc,;,,tld1a^a IN x a �a J W A 1' 1 W 1 A r, • m 1 1b20 M 1,1 1 0 A ' rn ' 1 I . y 1rt1 1 w 949 011 E 42532, rl. '''\ t t 1 1 It1 r. p IL I. f 1 ..... �_.. 5 db li X60 �N }, 13 9 N 5752 1 I I.Td lur,a ° 0 /I as it 4 le I lir c p 4 om m N /k• • ��fi 3 b ,1 dt N•. t S s� t i i 0 11111 illkillikokikvia,min isti 411 r,,.., , r s w • O a +� Si ,i I04.,,4 f � y A. o ii±*I II.w r yw yi"er ,.,r. �} y ° 1 �,... •.+r'y+ i.'�"I a —.,7 ' '' v.„. d .µ, .fitt �, tyc .;"r� , , ,a+ , ` i: `r^.", «r4� ' iat ✓"9!l=N+:, a� , �yy� y.I.`rA h +.'''' Nocri e,-',.�. pf'Y3I,1• Mr.A. ..,t,.'�,, n 3 .'-,.. • .1t..+1,.:, ,fit,R,,..,, + `.,' ,�,,..,1,,; '1i1 '."*,1.'f+'0Y...F�r rs ;Y,101'1g,r7M...^r * �,t'�k' /''n',S4.1'. '104' r�i 7. ',,r GJay«Y 1'n: ..wsn ,:mq:1 ,,,,..'7 w.k,. rk4,`.rm,,,-,...1, ??.1,,),.4.' ro•!).fr ,`s.'1 , v: *4; ' rid, 4- w'irN*k P /); n s , �- A° y y k„,.. 1. w M rt w 7 M , zepD 6 -78-0 ' ' ... „.,, .A. , . 2,5_2..c..2.._ZIr2„,,) l l Z-71,26ci � .�,r 3 V *'- :tXtfr, , ,'.7_,5-/ _ .4 70/ / 2 ,, / '0,--.3 i 7c)0,,, i. 1. i / 1,„ ' , . , (0_, . L , 0 / 23(.9o' (9 0(7 2 (3c:,, -s (, i / s'. / �, 9,....,.,_...., 26. ..... �- V V ,. . ,. , A7. 2-5 1 s ,2..e, p — 15702 ,1,, '-'i 1/ 75-0`. . -,) -5-_42, 60/i 660 ...............____ __ . .......4 i i / . . 3 t..--e-.)_ '-':i /, ,r,),&--) 1< ., J . ,-;45.1. tg,A c-- I � M.Y�Ir .M1111�4+ . "e - - 3�bl . iZti,;; e',T .(tM. / y„;y 1 a . (lc LIO 3 cio6.66.1,.,31 toAll a t73 4z 0 4.04,..i .. 4.4,430-ljolieri I,fi. „c",,,,, ,,,, , , w.-/ 4,11/4101-411P- '4 -410r "I',0 c-e-56-L-cicicuMp( . ; - ;c c 1. V c°�le,� ' r . (-, , ,v, ii i, ,. ,c,-c/cofyl.c7iiep,7„.4.04es---6, ,,,, . ,,, ,,./,/,)/c) ,-2, -5:7,°J..,,,,z,-(-2,-)9,, 0 0. et„ .. , fili i — , / ra.,-)6 jig,--; _.,?g(fr ' 1 C.)-(.166, .)e?4- , , „I , , I 2/ :,i) n, e. ,, I :v�.rr, �.K.M...,.::.�k. ry.µ. :,...._.�..r«-,.-._........,..�—...:.,w,.w...+�w.r�^+..*«�M4ma+�Mr+r�eu�,atir�s.�stw=sxa:+w.---'.•g�' +�+•,wwi�w ,I • i • : P D g--L6 .490 F.L.91 Aiatc..v.Q.,02211 9r2,62/ /.,c-6 cs6L) 22x2/2 -7 11,z/00./ tzo's 26V4/2,,t4 q705- • iye"-ffie L15 6t) 42-5-6 5 ) ,72a, /1 • /27/eqs Ee ) 1yod L./. //%1 , 466.14.,e 665-pdc-acivr6, • 427` :1) s(vPac, iV V/22d (?cet iZ700 Sct) 4/4u.y. 703///qp466-19-z 0/6 Cv3 1 703 /020o ' 72-2-0/ Pobv Aetz :12.52221 e:72,90//b24et 0444 i&Atia,GriL,, 1130 S6,114tL,V1 Ocb'?) 5605 42-17:5' )6 0-6A cr7065' , „ . . .. . , . . , . . . . .. , . . . , . • , , , (;.. • , . • • . L., . . • , , , ..... ( q. ' I ' t 1 I.. .., . . ,. Il• L.75'l r........ ..ein , , f* , . . . lo°1J A,),Le/ • ' Le6/6-604,,, • ) 4 I , A ...r.72-12.Q8,1 ed(,/ ,, ..r.'.,t1:.. .-.,_._, --.- - , - •- .-------4, , ,. ,:. ,. 3oole-i-h 74.1et. lailL ),. r-s".) / 4v.- . , . _ .. ,,. . ,„,,, . , . Plc ,.. , .. 6:),6i 97,26/ .. ., 'if;• do, ., 0 0, 01,X . ., 1 • . f • - 3.. _,Q1 5 g1 72.1. ax3 -10 a 1‘,1 4 53 5- s(A) 9,cua-- /c\k-x- -e I i., drop .,/e F ris,fin-44-141 ,....„,....................................................„, . _ ......._____________so ,,...,:e......,0 I , ... .., !, . 1 ., . lir/6PC30,5 64-). i, " ' •. I. 2. 142 5. 1/4.5s60 Pc:Let Al4V_, ' . ,. .., . , •• , . . . • L"--0 ce....,73 1,,t,.., eti.3 ,—) .. 1,•.0-41 . . d . . .. i . . '', /5--•(_-2_dliwe'l,'&2.. • ' (:,-:),(0,„ cfccpcuvz/L. . 1.... i / 763' -5-ed /2"2Q /846.'W ' c. . , i I .,... '3t-,20 47 5.'. ., /0 c"--A-e. ,. , . . , . . co / 6( i fi--ek(, ?7_2../.4. _, _ \ c.) - a4., ,,,.., . ....0,,,,t--/T-A"ep i ar--0-6.. 9g/8 ,. 4..., / ,,,,,3/ i e,0 ! ! ) ........._, .:..7.) 1 . )ta,90 S2 , , . 1 b : . i., ,,.„ -....„....-,.... .;,,,,,„. -,,4„...:„.....,,, ,,...,,,...,„,,,,.„,„..,,,,,,,...,„,,,,,, ,,,,.,„:„ ..,,,,,,,.„,„..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,...„-....,,,„..,....,.,-.:::„.„:.-„:„.„-- ,,,,,„, , :.,:„;,,,,,,..._,,,,,,,.„;‘,..,,,:„;„„.a..„,.„_.:„,—.1,.:—.4,—...,, '.• r ' ' ' ' ' ' ',' ' '' ' ' ' ''''-' ' ^ _- - � . . . ^. . .,` . . ~` 12420 S.W.Main,Tigard,Oregon 97223 .° ° .. _ e/«�.3 `1(4-_-� . ' , . . ,� . ^ • . ` .. . .„ . „ . . , . , ..,- . , 1 CITY OF TIGARD . • 13,0,Box 23397 12420 S.W.Main,Tigard,Oregon 9'7223 ) t , . 1,' . , ',... ..-•' BISBtE Ma) 13tN8014 1 . .S 10550 BW 5 th #2i Beaverton, OR 97008 . . ,,,:. A' '.. ■, , Atli L't:/ !'„) 1 „t ,,,' '..'. , d. ,. ,- - ..,‘„,„,,,,,.., , •, ),,. 'IF:, 'f' gi r'''r , , ,,,.., .,,r,.....• 44...•...s,,,,,,r—R.4.3,4isM.b", •. ,, .,. 1 ■ ' 0 , • 1. V • • • • c‘, , ••• • . • • , • MEMORANDUM r • TO; J. B. Bishop PROM; PLANNING D/RECTOR • SUBJECTa PLANNING cOMMISSION MEETING POR. APRIL 22, 1900 DATEI April 2, 1980 Duo to the foot that the April 1S, 1960 mooting schedule for the • Planning Commission was full a1 the time of your submiksion of Materials fox a seas shaa5a, the PlarAing COmmission has agreed to hold a Special meeting on April 22, 1to40 to consider your request. Aldie Edwardo Planning Director AHIntic , ) 4 7 Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Division 522 SW Fifth, Portland, OR ,97201 • Mailing Address: Box 1760, Portland, OR 97207 INDIRECT SOURCE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION APPLICATION TO: ( / Construct a New Indirect Source ( ) Modify an Existing Indirect Source An indirect Source Construction Permit shall be applied for at least 90 days in advance of the anticipated shart of construction. The Department may request additional information within 15 days of receipt of this applicaiton. The Department will act to approve or deny acliaLeittl application within 60 days after receipt 0 of the completed application. 1. Project • Project Name Address of Project .....tZC.Ce_a_Ajjkj,..0. 4 ; rela.4144.13_1DAA- **111/43 .4. Street City State • Zip ClEvits..0 pfrfACAservi. osc.g...v 9 asp w Ds pr. ska ocg oge Nattire of Business t g, t c p_c. V O a • 4. . 4 4;:e izikoafor.iimi zkiviri-gtTor..7 Estimated Construction Date 410 -I•me.oe !MIL No. of Parking Spaces 5Z., (Please include information requested pursuant to OAR 340-20-100 through 20-135) (For parking permits, see the second page of this form)* 2. Application Information (Permit will be issued to this person, agency or business) Business Name ?4 ft E TT PEtvrth 0, w Arr Mailing Address j E c- °O*1 I 9 Street . City State rp • Responsible Person to Contact OE m w4,062.... Title Other Person Person Who May Be Contacted. 7Sfe„, 7.5%'t4-kotP Title C.,E ' Corporation ( ) Partnership ( be) IndivdUal ( ) Government Agency ( ) 3. ConsUltant Information (If representing applidaut) • • 1, Business Name LVNAAlti)/ Mailing Address 2 t3 StA.) V'A A ft-Pt' rt. qr1 i-Li-A! 0.11/4i street City State —Zip-- alwtttyxr,V Responsible Person to Contact ?...;-131: A ti NA - //o Title I Other Person Who May Be Contacted lAbt..0, /14'ir Title ka.:117-tgvs.7"- m., Signature of Applidarit. N.\ )t, 1 k\ 11 Date A ‘i PiV k a , Title L:t#4,.1. * c)40-11si.F`e Phone '2, LAI "" 06.,44 )1 ..,. lease note, as pet Item li On the seCond page of this fort, the Department no longer requires ambient monitoring Eat carbon monoxide and lead concentrations for parking facilities. 4\ Where carbon monoxide air quality standards are pro3ected to be violated in 1983, all / ' projeCts will be evaluated for approvability oh the basis of Whether or not their contribution, or inCretental increaSe,to a cakbon tonoxide 8 hour average Standard • violation is no greater than 0.5 mg/M' 8 bout average concertrationi, Permit Application Addendum: DEQ L ,NC ac COMPATIBILITY ar.rN IREMENT$ ,d STATEMENT CRS 197. 130 and DEQ' s Coordination Program,* as ac./roved by LCDC , require that DEQ- issued permits yror new or. 'expanded facilities not become effective until a Statement r w �ateinE'nt , I� ' of Compatibility wish applicable local land use plans and Statewide Planning Goals is provided .L..o the DEQ from the responsible local planning authorities. + ' Facility. Apo l cant's Description of the Nature & Location or P roocsed New or Expanded (Include appropriate legal description, planning reference information. / / Check if `4 `he .site i s inside an urban Growth but Attach o e h `'r Boundary buv outside ci �y 1 imi ts. evidenc.� ay or city concurrence with the county Statement if concurrence not given below.) . r. AyR 4 „-#:.- ,,�r,,,,) ,L d..+ Ii :. //.. �)-,, fb,,L,vl/�•'. ) G,•17/ , /.1 7�i•%� Sc.�,y,°i r Ilir'D C �_" ,'A1.//L� "..7-4. 7_ .... '."'.`.......-..�-.tea........ _ YC� / ,�'. .l., $,• N,.,f+,r. , , ., v�",V 1,,•4..tip% ,/— I /� /'-.4? .2 / "2•x"1 C. -%•4 A. . tr •`. c..'c. ,ec �, ! dJ / v .4c ., /:r6jC./ .;..0 .. ),, 4 �.► :.r„cite �'' ” Z7 s r .- r. `x..,, Iu rur40ti ..sr,4.1 , � /7i t�" s 1 , ,r,,f J N(�J '/C/,:"...r.... y `":0.5 C �• !%"'/ 7// rU .^1 I r-i 14 /'-/ .dL .h- , ..:::. i ,-zi m C 1../i r 4%7✓/ ....,S r'''',c..7 0.4) r,/tJ 5,T r 4.A4"... - • y . ..'`'- ,.. '�1 5 G �l Jy �r r. � Al ��A.r/�.hl !'�L: ��,+... r s/'�j.Y� , / ri•+•M Y\/1Ir /! 7��'.%�/.�r: �ti'-�4)/.� LL. ��I)c.„-_,.. 1�....� ' , PZ.JCL A,; e , ....i„4,L, { { 1 ('atl r '�` i> j i 1/4.),.z. C O M P L E T E ONE O N L Y OF T H E F O L L O W I N G: 0 f i i 1 ` fAppropriate U Statement o Com at b i t Y ' ram Land use Authority. (An equivalent State- -- U ment may be provided in lieu of this form.) •., g, .� ��.�/Cm tr has reviewed` . . � ._ _/.Z.. ': r1�` the above referenced proposal l for compatibility i b i 1 i ty • with cross out one its LCDC Acknowledged Comprehensive P l an) ( .. -'r�d' mq ,, .!"ic.«4-1 ►) and finds tie proposal to be compatible. • ;.... 51 „„,,,,,i- ,... :.� --w� T i t,l4,,,.�, .-', Date a • _.,... C i ty concurrence inside Urban Growth Boundary: w Are Signe ,�` Ti i ,c *' Dat • y . i L. Request to Proceed With Permit !:'rocess i hg peed i nc RPCe i p t df Gompat b i 1 ty Statement, I :. certify have app l ed to .: i , '2. r'% r I on f ( )I � . I�.he�:hereby oY� �,,i fy that 1 , . . , , - - � � • . , c :4 rr . t _ •�.. for the necessary Statement 6f Compat i a 1 1 i t . The local review w action on I s expected to be complete by !,41, ,4'kt; . I hereby request DI Q to 1 .4".! p r.o ceed with Processing my app 1Icatio n during this time period in order to rnirtimie delays. I understand that the per4r i t' when issued a not{ becotl delays. ere quested e effective :..5 until the Compatibility Statement is filed with the Department jSig 11 ed .y --„. r� _ -t___....,k . w f < 4 bate VNi 11,,A I v ,. ._1 l 1 , LL c-�� t.. /. ,..,„, ,..rep•w:.n.rm»,.'u9'GdriauSS48d9jACi.^`.�+ALY�' lw`..a'�i. Wl..s wy f 1 . h • cep e-tti (( / r ) , ,t.- INFORMATION REQUIRED TO COMPLETE INDIRECT SOURCE FORM APPLICATION 1. A map showing the location of the site. 2. A description of the proposed and prior use of the site. 3. A site plan showing the location and quantity of Parking Spaces at the Indirect Source and Associated Parking area, points of motor vehicle ingress and egress to and from the site and Associated Parking. 4, A ventilation plan if parking is subsurface or enclosed. 5. An estimate of the annual average and annual maximum daily (24 hours) vehicle trips detailed in the highest one and eight hour periods of the day, generated by the movement of mobile sources to and from the Parking FaCility and/or Associated Parking Facility for the first 4ftd fifth years after completion of each Planned incremental phase of the Indirect Source. 6. A description of the availability and type of mass transit recently serving or projected to serve the proposed Indirect Source. This description shall only include mass transit operating within 1/4 mile of the boundary of the Indirect Source. • 7. A completed DELarptC• atj.t,ality Requirements and Statement form (attached) . • c iw :7-44 c., –/ C) • 17,4" e'•41 s PLO C / 4", .4S "•• Z:44 6 • z4 3, S Ti PI 4 4 1 6 , Jc. — /71,1 • * 4.7 76,PS r • . " 1 — 1, • • 4...7_4 ,t)41 iv Are-4,9 it)r•-• 7H,E, ' • 4:47“ 4 4` oLI .7 ( it — 4 //Ai ,u AXPA•i (4/19) , tift M4Liy 7`;* ,teeceli ./ / _ .. I'll ,,,, il , • . , . li . , Department of Environmental Quality • • . • Air Quality Division ' 522 SW Fifth, Portland, OR 97204 Mailing Address: Box 1760, Portland, OR 97207 i SHORT FORM INDIRECT SOURCE CONSTRUCTION PrIRMIT APPLICATION , d' , Parking Lots 150 - 1000 Spaces . . APPLICATION TO (),(,) Construct a New Indirect Source ( ) Modify an Existing Indirect Source 1. Project Information . ,i, . . ;\ Project Name AV ,4 i ' SZAivi - / ''' '`-' e4-, _sj ,,. Address of Project ithri /AI si- tit/ . ,9 /1eee-vIii / ne 9346. ,, ree -CI State Zip Nature of Business .6„..,1',4:L Estimated Construction Date $a-2 -4_14:c9L_CeitiaSiaLtAINo. of Parking Spaces 2. Owner Information (Permit, will be issued to owner) BUsiness Name A(61117.-4v1"-- eve/e4n/e. ,, , ,e., Mailing Address .S jlx,L-e 36),TEALelr„7 or ,) to law,. a tt ctil i Mee r, cce .. ' Street Lity State --- Zip (..„841_ 40/;2: g...... Responsible Person to COntaCt rdLittsiLlo Title le:4) . // Other Person Who May Be Contacted 64,1 -,.' 06 1 ,0 -a. Title te i,/-4_,AL.._,.. ._,),J,Li___ . ../ ! Corporation ( ) Partnership ()<) IndividUal ( ) Government Agency ( ) .„--'17 • . ,o, 7 e-m /ly Date el‘ ire,r,-/11 .-, 45 . , Signature of Applicant ,-)....- ,!4-e,e,../.,)5 ,/ ,.,4 ' Title 2212., .. 61A4241:1'6' e *.aLi f rytel.................. Phone 0:, —i $ i ThiS short form indirect source permit application ig designed to expedite applica- . 1 tion processing. Please complete the informatiou requested on the second page of this application and attach it to this completed application form. The Department will review the application to determine if air quality Standards are jeopardized by the project. If additional infOrmation is requited to complete the review, the Department must make thia request within 15 days of receipt of this application. ') I i i • The decision on to approve or dehy the application will be made no later than 60 clays _ information after 8111 i is received. , _ i NOTE: Where carbon monoxide air quality standards are pojCtted to be violated in . 1983, all projects will be evaluated for approvability on the basis of Whether or not their contribUtion, or incremental increase to a carkdn monoxide 8 hour average standard violation is no greater than 0.5 mg/m" 8 hot= e'verage concentration. • ) .IPAi (4/79) A • - _ _ y •••••■•,•-•••••I•.• • • )0 47 ) 4gomvE LANDS PERMIT 1.‘ REQUEST PPLICATION FILE # /V - Fo FEE REVD- c=9° . Tigard Planning Commission 639-4171 RECEIPT # , 12420 S.W. Main St. , 'Tigard, Oregon 97223 DATE REC'D. , BY .1. PLEASE PRINT IN INK OR TYPE Nction Requested land fill near Fa,nno Creek - Tigard kPPlicant°s Name Buchholz/Bishm Mainstreet Develotd,. Phone 246-5469 kpplicant's Address 10505 SW Barbur Blvd. #303 PortlandL_OR, 97:,119 '(Street) (City) ;State') (Zip) -- JB Bishop,& Herm Buchholz, General Partners, and Limited Dwner ' s Name Partners of Ann Buchholz liran...1 -1,- (.13-tichholz),1Xarl, BuchhOlizne 246-5469 Dwner' s Address 10505 SW Barbur Blvd #303, ,Portland OR 97219 (Street) CitV) TE -c-zr6) ppli.cant is Owner X and Contract Purchased X Developer Agent Other )wner Recognition of Application A \ 0 .1 '715: 1/4 vl -4, signature of owner(s) '`$'; ?erson responsible dr application JB Bishop and'Herm Buchholz 10505 SW Barbur 131vd e #303 Portland, Oregon 97219 Street) (City) (State) .• :Zegist,ered Enginee.r s Name RiC. Sutherland Phone 224-9190 kegistered Engineer' s Office CH, phone 224-9190 ' egistered Engineer Address 200 Market St. Bldg, Portland, Oregon (Str;eet) (City) (Sta.teT (fir)) %). , , • TOPER TY INVOLVED' Tax Map # 26 2AC Ta.,x (s):„ of arce ‘ddmai''ily 12660 SW Main, Tigard, Oregon Area 11,51 (acres) sting Buildings (it and type ) motel, 2 residence, 1 greenhouse & shop, 1 barn, 1 retail plant sales, 1 boat adcessory—retaii sales blag,, t.i.trent Zoning c 8 ._. CUi'tetit, Use as above • tpplicant Applicah€08 Coimier.tai_Retaii_Deveirnent Inciu e$„ ept_ ,ore,, rocery Sto 'tOpoSed 1/./Orii.ng_u ° FID PropoSed USe onops, ues.,auran and 11",iterol—Institution Page 2 .0. Note: The follow)ng information on pages 2 & 3 of this report are presently to be ot, considered Itimated and approximate. A co V '''ete and fully documented report to be prepared by R.C. Sutherland, Ilydroana1. .,A, CH2 M Hill, will follow prior to preliminary PDsagNik‘Altigirgripy50/1,80. REQUEST Fill Type of fill: clean compacted ear then materal Cubic yards of fill: 520 Area of site to be occupied by fill: 7000 sq. ft. (Sq.Ft. (Fill) /Sq.Ft. (Site)) x 100 = o1.4 % of site to be filled. ' h Distance of fill from stream' s edge: Horizontal Distance nearest. t 25 Ft. Vertical Drop: maximuM°111 10 Ft. Type of bank to be ins+alled: fifffigpd cle a n ear t h and rock supported b pro bab le Net change in storage capacity of floodplain resulting from fill none CU.Ft. to 520 cu.yards maximum Will the fill increase the flood crest or modify the flow of floodwaters? Yes No X If so, what will the quantitative effects be? (Attach a sheet for explanation) . , Structures Existing structUre(S) in floodplain: None • Height - Ft. Width Ft. Distance from stream' s edge: Horizontal Distance -- Ft. Vertical Drop -- Ft. Proposed structure(s) in floodplain porttore Height 25 Vt. Width 200 Ft. Distance from stream' s edge: Horizontal Distance 20 to 25 Ft. Vertical Drop 5 to 7 Ft. to flood plain .. Distance between existing and proposed structure (nearest Point) N/A Pt. Will the Structure increase the flood crest or modify the flow of flood Waters? eS X If so, what will the quantitative efects be? (Kttacri67gheet for explanation) , ‘1, •f. Will the proposed StrUcttre be designed to Withstand the destructive effects of a flood Without significant damage? (Attach a sheet to explain specifics) . The proposed structure will be teat or above the 500 year flood plain, 1 • 4' .14 fif PAGE 3 • 00 , , SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT REQUEST Storage What type of materials are to be stored? None Volume/quantity of material (s) N/A Distance of storage from stream's edge: Horizontal Ft. Vertical Drop Ft. Distance of storage from nearest building -- • Ft. Will the material be anchored to prevent movement in the even of a Flood? Yes How? No Why Not? - (Attach a shet for explanation) Type of screening for storage -- • 4 N. ,... 'i;� x61 7,;.,L ,c DI'rio.-u 108 VARIANCE TEMPORARY USE, 1\u. e1:,_ .�:.: ,c'.,,�,• ' 0 "I 1.'* USE RLQU STS .d • I•'\7 4L I`f''••A+t,_'i •" •�+ • . 2--C ,I �✓ ^(./. File r. • Fee Rec'd . Receipt ' ,5-',965, • * �, ' Tigard Planning Commission 639-4171 ' fe2420 S . Main St., Tigard, Oregon 97223 Date Eec'd., ,/ 5"d G _ uww,w • . ' he "contact person" named in this application will receive all nvjor correspondence frc5:n the Tigard planning Department and that person is responsible for providing same to owner, architects, engineers, consultants, etc. this case the "contact person" i5; NAME lf's 2 I r�l ..W. de- je/t't 1 f1ec.&g/ i4, i vi S 7/ee T 144 r+ ..._Z- , ADDREss_ g� e 0 3 �cr s SGc) Lei,, ,6`'.P d, P e avew 97...2✓? Tra,L Ptront 02`/V7 r✓ /6 9 , , Ail conwiunicati ns from this departxne t sL.all, include the appropriate file number. The file number in this case is I have read this section and I agree, as the "contact person", to provide e.19. inform , nation to other persons with an interest in this projsct, , L4 �� /76(0 I. si caa furs date PLEASE PRINT IN INX OR TYPE • 1 . Action Requested ' _ _ ' , ppl .cant s Name lr' , '-- e eve/'4 f '. d- ',` Phone , • Applicant's' Address_Sci, 03 /0;is SW bwkw /si ef4eP17 e ,74 ' �(street (city) (state) (zip) f :goner's Name .'d`. .f\e , ,�� ,/y/� ., '-,.-5�'Jf a - Pbone_ :___ . Owner's Addresst.su:*tj d.3 d ,� ILi"/5�i ,16e & le/4P'Pk"6, 2".22:-/1 9 ' (sere t) ' (cit (state) (zip) - } ' i pp]a oAnt is Owner`.. _ Contract act purchased >( JJeVe1operr__ Agent Other , ' ,ti fner Recognition of application: r r` / • x ,e : 4'.-4.-.1 A.r:.r,..4 , r1ej sign .ture •d oWner(s) '_---" . , per:gbh res,7cnsible Tor application ,gr`.a f f,,7-e.- 3o., • , "ar �,�Ir,'i •' hr �t! ! . , as,e., y., ,/`�,!,?//1�., ,M c st�eht) ( i y) (state) (zip) ,, „ • Map 1 ` )/,'C '',�7v °4","'54('') ✓FZt�J ER'T INi'C�LU �7 y Tax �1 s, r �1 / T`a. dot S T 242,... sa cti,±../ei iv 4.9";aro ; �C�dt �'u� w,1�t e� t1 1SL�C.:�,1t ��1���i+ I C ii,t41, G�,4 r r . ..xLS ,f •.`x.itlti tier; Buildings (.# and t y1 e)2 pY'Jtx.) 0,0e,..;,,,,..,,,,,,,..J 'ck,,oNt!,,A 5,6 , _.._„L..1'gr4)1...,."A./40c' s.►x ,,�- , ,7„...+1 -:,,. • p ;iu s. 8, ir•_,,___.,, _..».._.._....... ..., urren is toning c,'g h Current U8e_Ajo Af t u'4. ' , _ y pr 4noiter,4.t'4Z. A7:4/iL• AIct/t�N�,,rt,',,' "'a,w '" ".oplitti't't,'s , Ar �ictttit S .F,1rr"l."Ay#.`:s 4t f7`r7' d,'et 1s+ '' ,k4i. 1 •." i t•c.t, se ci` Zoning_ f� A'1 M f � .._ . pr o s e C s4�!'�'•n/�,� ,��'.� � �•`^te r j" ' igI8 � y N r ��',��.'l�i�,e" Fie t�2�'�, �a rr it 1.:�1�'�'lliie a �. i ,� ;�clnc� R�:t� �� 1,g l tha tt r i p t i oti L,-'U',.c i n ty Map , a map iie De +el,DPm ►rt t b �t w . . 0,, l'i \ . - .. c'Y i .II. # . . • ..,e. ' . / .,.-11. , .r..\ . ., .i. t,' ,_____\.... R 0'D 111111111i&41 X low . , inim ,, ,,,, . , • . ,;, # 8 . : ...... .k.. \--) 14-ipiii 71111 ' . 4.401.. 4 ?''.--- ' -,. : Y N7411100Aalir V ;i •' ; ,;w , St,.QFFINS STR s• . . ' Ar- lia .,,.. \ trAt firri't !.! 'rill! * A \,,,,oist , sIaajator ,. . ,4'..,---ir-oiwii pi,R)* ,.' ". ' • CRC,A 11111111111114 r „ , Oleg, .., . , ' 0 .: '''.11001114: 00 •••.' - . - ' ' •*amomai ... .. .•._ w. .,. .it . F L,,,iii . ..... . . . oREGoN . . . , ,..„ el. .. --- 11111�r wil• ,, � . M fi rr A sw . Il s_.2.,- ,.• • ' ,, 11 V 'N/ \",. 410 , . , . . -ir. , , II/II W I wr - •) Mt ) \ ‘' ' • . y• �✓ f W `�` ) w / �A t HI L Si, cn b IV 11111 ■ all r�: 1106 e® / Mi, ti:'.*-` iiiii ' 10.0.1100. ply ' sift iiiiii"IIIIVIllia '‘.111111.EM,Wiik ill,ill .. .,_,„ 0'; al , ..,* ...41.110,4114.- :.* mir., '''. .,',..° 0 ---l--- all , N . Pp . , 1 Op . Ilt ' IIIIII ....--,""...^r". Se ' ' a •pi;144 It..4 LL � r M r • r� 1111111' Mt Q , "" , S CHbOL, S.. � al,�. • .iiSi t ,air'�` ��y.l, �',.,.:: -..•. �...... .:..... .....:..� �iw,. YM/Y?iD rt :...:.s�•..:,f,,,.�•., r.,�( it/I, ..r.- ,YS ,^. ,, . . • - - ' 4 . .,-. .7,,,,:„.„„,...., ..a_�.,i6 wf w o-, � uras..x�t __. :.»:»;..�sdi;�s�aivai�iraa.�s e4�+�.:zre: •,. , . _. 4 " * . MAINSTREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD. Suite 303, 10505 SW Barbur Blvd. • Portland, OR 97219 March 24, 1980 • • SUBJECT: Application to City of Tigard - Zone Change of C 3 - M to C 3 - M PD by Buchholz/Bishop Ladies and Gentlemen: Mainstreet Development, Ltd. is an Oregon Limited Partnership , formed in 1978 for the specific purpose of developing the Buchholz property - Tigard and any contiguously positioned property as needed and available. The Partnership goals, after completion of the project, calls for the long-term hold of the Development for Family investment K, purposes. Partners include Herm J. Buchholz and JB Bishop as General Partners, and Ann Buchholz, Fran Hatt (Buchholz) , and • Karl Buchholz as Limited Partners. The accompanying final presentation of this application concludes • the culmination of planning extending back seven years in the • history of this property. The proposed final size and type of development is designed specifically to accommodate the numerous historic and present ' concerns of many, including; landowners, local resident owners, past and present City of Tigard elected and staff officials, NPO #1, the Park Board, the State Highway Depart- ment, and the ultimate tenants of the development . During these years, the applicants have keyed from various in-put from the above bodies which has lead to the site' s final configuration and • specific finalized site plan. JB Bishop Herm j. Buchholz General Partner General Partner lij8:ct 111 SUMMARY LIST OF ENCLOSURES .. Letter of Transmittal - Mainstreet Development, Ltd. 2. Application Form - Zone Map Amendment 3. Zone Map Amendment Application Fee ' 4. Documentation - Proof of Ownership 5. Narrative pone Map Amendment, Dean Potter; M.A.I. ` 6. Proposed Site Plan - David Kehle, A.Z.A. 7. Proposed Site Plan (Existing Buildings Superimposed) - David Kehle, A.I.A. tit„�� 8. Topographical Map - Robert Martin, P.D. 9. Transportation Analysis - Robert Allen, P.E. 10. Preliminary Summary of Landscapping - George W. Otten, Landscape Architect ii. Soils and Foundation Investigation -W Northwest Testing Laboratories 12. Sensitive Lands Permit (request) 13. Artists Rendering/Site Plan - G.I. Joe's, Williams 84 Gilliam, Architect and Planners 14. vicinity Map Streets & Prominent Landmarks Noted •, 15. County Tax Map - Quarter Section ti 16. Qualifications of Design Tem I'S'I' S PO t3F suBmrrrED AS THEY E3ECOME AVAILABT g 17. Hydraulogist Report - Roger C. Sutherland, P.L. 13. NPO #1 Project tvaluatian ( April 3; 1980 Meeting) 19. Additional Artists Renderings 20 Aerial Photos (Vicinity) 21. DF. Indirect, Source ;Permit Application included (approval expected within 60 days) r .•:*«..,:..�*wr,.+ +..,.:.w»ys..-... ...w,,,...-,a,.y.t 7” ......y"'rip"'"'''"5 s4k . C:.*41N , .,,+.,.: . t •. I w p4 • .•, w... david hie, `�rchitec9 yr '> 1932 first ave. suite 302 , Seattle, ashington 98101 ,,,::,*(206]206] 624-9495 March 21, 1980 office Resume' • I Dear Sirs: ti • I The firm o" David Kehle, Architect was established in May of 1976, involving itself in all phases of the field of architecture. A good working relationship has been established with related disciplines, enabling this office to provide a complete comprehensive project. These related disciplines include commercial and industrial analysts, planning and design specialists and complete engineering services including structural, civil, mechanical and electrical engineers. The firm is expanding as projects increase with the principle goal always in mind, providing quality architectural and related services to each client. David Kehle graduated from Washington State University in 1970, completing the five year architectural program receiving a Bachelor of Architecture degree. Since°graduation, I have worked in firms specializing in medical and nu ing care facilities, large residential planning and shopping centers retail • facilities. This has given me a varied background, expanding my level of knowledge in various types of projects. I am a Professional Associate member of the Seattle Chapter of the American ' Institute of Architects, I am registered with National Council of Architectural, Registration BO lyd (NCARB) and am licensed in the states of Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Montal,1a. I am presently applying for registration in California and � Alaska. inclosed is a partial list of work completed by this firm and projects I was directly involved in with other firms. I thank you for the opportunity to present my firm to you for consideration in future projects. Sincerely, 4Altstit (2E014 8 .$ 4":1r1. gotofsd PIAPJIL David Kehle . Incl. �p���,,�,.� .nws+f M f �Ji�iiilCGi�iiii'�rl � ', i �N...nI;Q 5.'wltSF k�. ::.T.�.:.:.-..J.. 1' u 4 ' C ' avid kehle, architect 1.932 first eve. suite;302 • seat-tie, vmshington 9810 r' [206] 624-94,95 95 Projects having been completed or being completed by this firm: Holiday Center (Shopping Center) Sumner, WA Holiday Foods Retail Shops Belfair Food Market - Belfair, WA Olympic Gateway - Shelton, WA Belfair Remodel & Addition Belfair, WA Shopping Center for KAMG Associates - Tacoma, WA Office Building for Associated Grocers - Seattle, WA '' Highlands Village - Shopping Center - Olympia, WA • Northwest Crossing Office Building - Kennewick, WA 5' Willing Office Warehouse - Bellevue, WA Willing Office - Warehouse - Mt. Lake Terrace, WA Willing Office - Warehouse - Everett, WA f g 'Thrifty -.Arlington, WA �.ft Foods -'Arlin to Ben Franklin Store - Belfair, WA fair, • Midnite Mart - Everett, WA • Abigails Restaurant - Redmond, WA Abigails Restaurant - Federal Way; WA Forest Service Building - Forks, WA Olson'sFoods, Silverlake Everett, WA Georgetown Hardware - Seattle," WA Thrifty Foods r Burlington, WA Olympia West Shopping Center - Olympia, WA Gratzer Lif t Truck - Seattle, WA - s Smith Tractor Fife WA Alaskan Copper & Brass Expansion Phases Y, II, & III - Seattle, WA Olson's Silverlake Pharmacy - Everett, WA • • • ■ Y• Pf{: ... ryn., 9Y..ryM.rJ +.•nm/.q:.w.H,,,,..u. 1 •i 9r ,... ���s ....... •rM rti,.AAr'w;.c.m �, .•..:.,.. ..... • r. • ;., ROGER C. SUTHERLAND Water Resources Engineer Education M.S. , Civil Engineering, University of Maryland, 1975 B.S. , Civil Engineering, University of Maryland, 1972 Experience Mr. Sutherland, a member of CH2M HILL's Water Resources Discipline, is a specialist in hydraulic and water quality modeling of urban systems, streams, lakes, rivers, and ' .. estuaries with particular emphasis irl urban nonpoint source pollution, Since joining CH2M HILL, Mr. Sutherland has Participated in an Anchorage, Alaska, 208 study which developed and applied a site-specific soil erosion model, Managed an Illinois 208 study which evaluated cost`" ,• • effective methods to control stormwater runoff pollution in eight Illinois cities, n V Participated in the nationwide 1978 Needs Survey for , t abatement t of pollution from Category V (combined sewer overflow)' and Category VI (stormwater discharges) , Directed the economic optimization of Category V and VI control alternatives for several sites throughout the nation Participated in a study for the City of Tualatin, Oregon, which offered guidelines for preservation of wetland areas, Mr. Sutherland is currently project manager of a stormwater management study for the City of Tigard, Oregon. The study will provide a drainage flood control and stormwater quality master plane Professional Registration t: Wisconsin 7 Membership in Organizations American Geophysical Union American Society of Civil Engineers American Society of Photogrammetry American Water Resources Association Chi Epsilon Tau Beta Pi • ` •• •• ... �. ,:., ..w� -.."....» ...,...watr> ..a•..3, m.:v+o. c'+ne.rwmuw}w+e+ ,+WIJW :'�^w .....rs-•...-.s.,ww. ., :: nor. ,x....x..rc_::k..aSTg{�y.ps::,M.r-•dtir.�.t.M.�.,«„� � 0 , ROGER C. SUTHERLAND Publications "Simulation of Urban Nonpoint Source Pollution," Co-authored with Richard H. McCuen. Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 14, No. 2, April 1978+ "Management of Urban Nonpoint Pollution. " Co-authored with Larry E. Brazil and Dean M. Mades, Presented at the 13th American Water Resources Conference, Tucson, Arizona, 31 October to 3 November 1977. • "The Relative Importance of Factors Influencing Pollution Loadings in Runoff from Urban Streets, " Co-authored with Richard H . McCuen and Robert L. Powell ASCE Urban Water Resources Research Program, Technical Memorandum No, 31, July 1976, pp. 85-98, "A Mathematical Model for Estimating Pollution Loadings in Runoff from Urban Streets Co. authored with Richard H. McCuen, Mathematical Models for Environmental Problems, University of Southhampton, England, September 1975, Pentech Press, London, 1976, pp, 283-297, "A Mathematical Model for Estimating Pollution Loadings and Removals from Urban Streets, " Master of Science Thesis (unpublished) . University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, January 1975, .vxyusY y ....r s.a.'., :,.:;:.M ... .,.;,., ......•:.., ..• .., •.. .e r; r..,r..m.,• ...++mmma,n, �.:;r..-,•-t 7;mrnmr.YtkrGee..,C.w..wo,....«:,+e:,.3,.. .. - - 111 GCORGC wm. OTTCN landscape architect March 20, 1980 Mr, J. B. Bishop 10505 S. W. Barber Blvd . Suite 303 Portland , Oregon 97219 R1111% Main Street Development , Tigard Dear Mr. Bishop : I welcome the opportunity to provide my Landscape Architectural services for your project in Tigare . After studying the site development plan and discussing with you your intent for land- -. scaping this project , I feel this development will be a compli- mentary addition to the city of Tigard . The existing nursery stock on the site will be incorporated in the plantings to the fullest extent . A few of the trees will be featured as individual specimens. Others that tight be one- sided from being in rows , will be massed together for an effective screening of larger building walls . The Greenway or the south property line will accomodate a mass planting of these trees. Because of their height and y crowd- .' it them together an immediate visual relief will be provided. The property line On the West can be planted no to establish an . evergreen screen for the apartment units before your construe- , tion begins . Thee are numerous smaller evergreen trees that we Will use throughout the landscape. Also some deciduous trees , camellias , Irish yews ., that will be incorporated into our plan. The parking area planters will be planted with deciduous trees such as Norway Maple, Red Oak, Pin 0a.1., sweat Gum, and etc, Under these trees we will provide a ground cover, that will not exceed a height of more than 6 inches . We have found that Varieties of Jdniper are the best type of Around cover for these planters because they stand up better under the abuse of fOot traffic and cats . • For the tank and Restaurant plantings we plan to use a variety of broad-leafed evergreens that will provide a variety of color through leaf color and blooms , Post Office Bo X 213 • BeaVerton, Otecjon 97005 • Phone (503) 644.5066 , . . . . . , . .. ....,, . . . . , . : ' ' le ■••■• 4 i,,, t ! ............................. ............................j......1........................... = GCORGE WIYI OTTO . . , r . landscape architect . . _ . .. . . ,. .L . March 20, 1980 Mr. J. B . BishOp ._ . , , .. Page 2 .• . . . . . . . , Out shrub aeleCtion will include the following: . . , Height 6-8' - Photinia, Cotoheaster patneyi, Portugal • . . . Laurel, Arborvitae, and Camellia. • Height 4-6 ' - Broom, Rhododendron, Ilex ( renata, and . ,., . ml. . Jap. tUonymus. . „ Height 2-4 ' ,-, tVtgreen Aaleas, Deciduous Ata1d4 , Skimmias , and Daphne Odora. . , . .,. Groundeovers - Kinnikinnick, juniper, Heather, and "inca Motor. . _ . My planting plans will indicate the name , carietv, spacing, and size of each specie of shrub and tree, to be used. , . The landscaped areas will be itrigated. With an under7round ' ,ixecl .. . . head, automatic system. The irrigation plan will indicate the . .. head and vlave locations , and also the pipe spacing and Ai26 --. . , , . . 1 believe this development will be enhanced by a Well planned landscape plan and I am looking forward to working with you 1. on this prolect, ... . ReSpectnilY, • / 1 ' d (101ei . . . , ........1 G'...' :gd Win. otters tie AtChitd dAde 4 111 An•a■ammimmNwdvla■noa.wvm•um•Nswowui••Inpwewlyi•••......k POO Office BOX 213 • BedVertON Otegbh 97005 • PhOnei (503) 644-5066 . . , • •.' ' (14 , • ' Cri...., " f.". ' °.0 . , .100 • GE:ORGE Wil OTICN • lat-idscape architect . - .... . , . . •• , , .. . . . , ... • . , „ GEORGE WM. OTTEN • *:' • .. , — Landscape. Architect . , , LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ' EXPERIENCE: , REGISTRATION:, , • Surveying , : State of Oregon # 3!) 'Design . Subdivision ,and Development State of Washington # 276 ‘, Clarb - National , 6, Landscape Development Design and Registration # 110 ' ' Planning '• , . . • . . , Commercial Are 56 . -', Residential * ' * ' ! ilunicipal RROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: ' . • , • Park Site Des Construction 29 years . . : , . - 6 Swimming Pool Plans and Implementation . • Served on City of Beaverton Planning Commission - 3 years 0 Served on City of Beaverton Board of , Design Review - 3 years ) ' 42 Member of State of Oregon Advisory Board for Swimming Pools Mr. Otten is the principal in his Landscape Architectural Firm. The • . . following are some of the projects he has developed in this area: . . . , , The planning and development of over 75 ' . park sites for the Tualatin Hills Park and , • i i • Recreation District, These sites range • from 2 acres to the Greenway-Robinson Park • development of 60 acres, Which inclUdes a neighborhood recreation center of 2 acres. . . The planning and construction of over 70 tennis courts, from single courts to a . multiple of four courts. These I.Ngi.rk . projects required all phases of landscape ' architecture. Also for the Tualatin Hills Park and necreation tastrict, Mr. Otten prepared the general landscape development . . . plan, planting plan, grading plan, and i . installed the rough grading for the Elsie 3. Stuhr Senior Citizen Center in Beaverton. . • , .. . .. - .. . ., . , , , • ,-------z--.tv.rT,-r;r.rr.-.-,---tt-.,-.,tt--tt,.,:.7------7--4:=-..-t-,.--tt.--------..-----tr-. ....., ------t1----:.t.t.... ,---7-..------..t.--t---------------------r----------- - , Post Office Box 213 0 Beavotion, orouon 97oop . P110P0 (503) 644-506. 4 J ' •r .V. • • e °4 i GCORGC ‘1411 (.0) I reN EIED landscape archuect . Page ?_ fp* GEORGE WM. OTTEN ,� k. «.�, Landscape Architect ° • EXPERIENCE (Continued) • The design, layout, and construction of • Rock Creek Golf and Country Club. Landscape plans for the Beaverton Turban { Renewal Agency Projects : Center Street, and the Hall-Watson Couplet, Plans and implementation of lanc.scape development for Washington Federal Savings and Loan, Beaverton and. Aloha. Designs and working drawings for all the , ' Thunderbird Motor Inn swimming pools H ` throughout Oregon, Washington, California Nevada and Montana, Many other pools for motels and apartments in the Northwest, including the Hilton and Sheraton Hotels . in Portland. Other assignments include landscape plans for numerous commercial buildings, industrial park sites, and private residences as well as consulting with the City of Portland on swimming pool renovations and construction prpjects re-» quiring, landscape expertise. Landscape and calk design along arterial through Greenway Subdivision, Beaverton. • f J ,� `....,.....,,»�. „: <N.�..:...�,._....-, «......�...., YiYlwYiwel...L.iiia+» >,Y..Y..4r` .. ,,:, ,.. ,,. •. . .., ,,,_. ,.. ., lxxirxJWY x-.. •, M 14.MY+.awN racp�+ 4 ...Y::.r+�.�.•.�Ya.x,wa�+Y.J..irwaw YRw�,w+..u�.,.w VFW M+AYNi.0 4Wrr.w...+Yb of µyMy.hu4tW..s 4r�i.«x.rw � ost C itice 0oX 13 geaVarf on, Otecjon 971 05 e P17ono 0303) 644.506. 6 • • p • d ' ' " ;, ' O. • t Yr �; a,3 .� ' 1:r___________ , GCORGE kA)M. OA 1 cri :., ..„ ,r ;, , , „ . , .. lc ndsca e. .architect . . , • .' . BRIAN'L B !,. BEARWOOD Landscape Designer/Planner f; • h • • EDUCATION EXPERIENCE • ' ' EE _ ' Bachelor of Science Corvallis Bikeway Study, Design Landscape Architecture/ • & Public Presentations • '`,,+ Planning ' r, . t • Oregon State University . * ' .Landscape Design & Construction Corvalli's, Oregon - Drawings • Planting Plans 1 AGE 28 Irrigation Plans • • • •• S Gradin g Plans :. PROPESZONAL EXPERIENCE y rs . '`v Subdivision Site , EMPLOYMENT Ar 'zRM l yr , r . ' ® Playground Equipment Design '� p� s for a Comprehensive Master Plan Clackamas County Park r . 4 Neighborhood Park Design :. } • e Client Representation at Public Hearings • , Since joining George Otten t s firm. Mr. Ecarwood has prepared landscape, t, planting, irrigation, and grading ' plans and details. He is currently . " working on a series of neighborhood park designs for Tualatin Hills Park and Recz ea �.on District. } r ` • Prior to working with this firm, Mr. Architect Daryl ~Ma of Portland and tear wood has w�`)y,ked for Landscape ' Landscape Architect Charles DeDcurwaerder of Corvallis; where worked on a wide variety .., asst, nmelits. Those included of s he wide g �.�:�dcd dca,�gn . +� �• of Corvall design r is ikeway Plan and and i presentations, subdivision and PUD design and r e ���z ed p ubl� c hea�yin g s jI. w•.iW iaY . ."Y. N • . �" . nit e•LL ��♦M,,"""•,.`"•1 + • IWY«..w a+ d W . p w ":'"'w "-a[+4.0".,.*'W a"..",. ...'�.i♦ =It.ir •...rYr ......rrw+rY.....ww+•r.:-.4 •w.-....4i.wJ,..=+It=..' • ' ,,. r w. rPos101 ds Sox 213 4 Ec w� e rlch, Orcgor 9)0 5 e phone (503) 64.5066 ,: '01f `S L�+... '... .. .. +wr°-Maem'wuJ.a'^r'Y M'pPd•C9A# Y9 7"'.''31r+r"•.F.k'•^d«...r1v.4u.r k -.. ..... ..... ,.. .. .. .......„, .,...,.,. tlr.YVR..•p•.A L.Y.A ..r • w...N s.r .ry..i„y A.Fn.J0.'M,f..h.• •..w ..u. rot.«... •<ahcm-q. .... .. .. . \ .r .. • GCORGE Wril 0 i F -C-N , . . . • •• ,,,„,: . , , _ _ -CID . . -.,' . , .. . ..r landscape archi ct • • • • o ", JUNE K. CARLSON' • , Landscape Designer :♦ H .EDUCATION EXPERIENCE — •• r a.chelor landscape Architecture . it Park Planning, Design-8c, Development ,, University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon M County Comprehensive Planning AGE 25 Giti en Involvement Projects . .PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE -- 3 yrs. • Site Design & Development Planting Plans • ' EMPLOYMENT AT FIRM • 1 Yr�: Irrigation r ;: Grading Plans • Since joining George Otten 1 s firm , , ' Ms. Carlson has been involved in the preparation and presentation of development plans for a 50 acre Planned Unit Development for Lakewood ' , Properties. Other projects include . design and construction detailing L . of a kiosk for the Beaverton Urban ` Renewal Agency and site ana.ly si s and planning for the Tualatin Hills Park , , • and Recreation District.. ;' • Ms. ' Carlson was previously the Park Planner for the Bend Metro Park and Recreation District and was responsible , " .,.N 'or park site design and construction • . ' and long range comprehensive planning. Projects she was involved in are a r new indoor swim facility -- juniper Aquatic Cente_ , an 80 acre school/park complex - Skyline Athletic Park; an ,', urban trails system -- Deschutes River Parks and a street redevelopment plan - Eend Beautification Project She. was involved in developing a bike trail system with municipal citizen , and ti p ,, extensively onou s and also worked y the Deschutes County - r Comprehensive Land 'Use Plan. !4 ;r . • It N .. - < ....fa..,w._w.r.. ....«s .,-t: .w t , �.+ » +n'..,t. .r,....�.." :--t'-�w. .. .a w.w.:-k..- `. . .-,— ,... -.. -: - — . 'I nvsftrice ox 213 80ov rton are o 9 005 phone (b03) 644.5066 ., . l 1 • ♦:+.•Y+r<:a.w..e.,v r..cw.ww.x.:s.n,•,.♦rs.y.MN»,a,...,;.w..f—w..,j,. r :,..w....«..raw.r+•_*.w»«.++w,+...+w+++,•..+T+r,.+Mr 4t.t YmarvL.h:iMdAt 4, Y'v.Tu. ....... yy, «f #+ +l>A.i V.-..liA^r ;µKS♦ , * I ...01 GE]0 QGE W[Y] OTTE:N • landscape architect' .• • PAUL H. SHUEY Landscape Designer ' EDUCATION ' ' EXPERIENCE • Bachelor of . Science ' 0 Site Development Design & Planning Landscape Architecture ' College & School Campuses ' California State Urban Street Renewal Projects , Polytechnic University * , * • Pomona, California ' t'" ® ' Landscape Design &, Construction Drawings • • AGE - 39 Planting Plans Irrigation Design PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE - 9 yrs. Grading Plans EMPLOYMENT AT FIRM - 2 yrs. 0 ' Swimming Pool Plans Site Design & Development Commercial Municipal Residential' Since joining George abtenis firm Mr. Shuey has been involved in the , design development of the Hall/Watson Street Couplet for the ,Beaverton Urban Renewal Agency. Other assignments have included design and preparation, of construction drawings. for tennis courts, swimming pools and street and parking lot layouts for commercial, municipal and , residential projects. Prior to his employment with George Obten Mr. Shuey wee employed by Landscape Architect Bill Roth of ' Portland, Oregon. While there he was involved in Williams & Vancouver Street Project and Emmanuel flospital Site nevelopmenti He wac also • involved in the preparation of • landscape plans for ,Chemeketa Community College in 8a10171,1 Oregon. e 0 • • • SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 9011 S(t4'.. V1. Beaverton Highway OP OREGON Portland, Oregon 97225 P.O. Bo X 661 Beaverton, Oregon 97075 PRELIMINARY TITLE 'REPORT Telephone: (503) 297-4941 3/14/80 Order No W 17219 K • To SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 12290 Southwest Main. Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Attention: at Thorne C.M.Ak Customer Ref 530 2316 P MAIN STREET DEVELOP. LTD. • Standard Purchasers $ 15,000.00 ' Premium $95.00 We are prepared to issue a title insurance policy in the form and amount shown above insuring the title to the property described herein. This report is Preliminary to the issuance of a policy of title insurance and Shell become null and Void.unless a policy is issued, and the full premium therefore paid. Vestee: GERALD C. CACU and JOAN L. OACH, as tel-iants by the entirety. Dated as of: Match 10, 1980 at 8:00 a.m. Subject to the exceptions, eXclUsionS, conditions and stipulations Which are part of said policy, and to exceptions as shown herein.. SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CF OREGON Thomas P. Key 6 Title Officer • • • • • .1 L.••••••■•••00...,*1 1,■••••••• • Order NO W 17219 ( Page No. 2 , = , DESCRIPTION: See attached description sheet. EXCEPTIONS • 1. The premises herein described are within and subject to the statutory powers including the power of assessment of the Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County, • /2. Restrictive Covenants to Waive Remonstrance, including the terms and provisions thereof Recorded: October 13, 1976 • • Book: 1118, Page 569, Records of Washington County /3. Trust Deed, including the terms and provisions thereof, given to . secure an indebtedness with interest thereon and such future advances as • may be provided thereinit • Dated: September 17, 1979 • Recorded: September 19, 1.379 • Recorders Fee Not 79038310, Records of Washington Co T ;y Amount; $62,869.52 • Grantor: GERALD C. CACH 4nd JOAN Lo CACH, husband and wife • Trustee: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY' Beneficiary; HOWE LEE and YORE SIM LEE, huttband and wife, with • right of survivorship Covers other property also. ve 4. Real Estate Contract, including the terms and provisions thereof. Dated: September 27, 1979 Recorded: Recorders Pee No.: October 133,4gle:'17:ds of Washington ConntY Vendor: GERALD Co CAC , and JOAN L. CACH Vendee: SOUTHWEST PORTLAND PARTNERSHIP (consisting of Tom X. Stern and Helen DO StOrn) covers other property also. 5. Terms and provisions Of the partnership agreement for Southwest Portland Partnership. • 4.1u •A.**, 44.4-4 --.444,444 .4. .4444, „ • A • Order No, W 17219 K Page No 3 •, • EXCEPTIONS: 6. Taxes for the fiscal year 1979-80, Unpaid, • Amount: $2,214.98, plus interest Account No.: KEY 0461681 Map: 281 2A0 00200 Levy Code: 0168 Covers other property akao. • 7. City lions, if any, of the City of Tigard, (Mt: inquiry has been directed to the City Clerk concerning, the status of said liens and a report 'will follow if such liens are found') NOTE A: We find no judgments or United States Internal Revenue liens against: SOUTHWEST PORTLAND PARTNERSHIP, TOM K. STERN, HELEN B. STERN, or MAIN STREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD. • 4NOTE B: The Corporations Commission has no record of SOUTHWEST PORTLAND PARTNERSHIP or of MAIN STREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD. NOTE C: Any transfer of the herein described property is subject to the payment of Washington County Transfer tax at the rate of $1000 per $1,000,00 or fraction thereof of stated consideration End of Report. * cc: J,B4 Bishop gereld C. Cach , Martin Engiheet:thg Bob Martin sb • • • • _-:... .'.„ :'= 's:==;:v.-a a:..+*:: ..uar::.wr r+a• ,,�,, t r--,r�-y#+ -may...'-- ..�.-.:. •x •--i —.....».—»,.•-•--k;.--U w..-,w .-::y:.,.rr--n ti� .-'-r: .;:--,�^='='ii•---�-^-- ....:�:.�+ss icy.. _.. f J` . 1 , tl It 17219 t DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 3 1 U SHAM SGT,, .7a nington. County, Oregon, ,n ~the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 ,Jest, Willamette Meridian, described as follows Beginning at the most southerly corner of said Lot 3; thence North 46° 07' .24" gest 176,89 feet along the so; theast line of said Lot 3 to the most northerly corner of Lot 9, B'UR1} '' ' 49° 14. Vest thence North' ' t: 12700$; feet; thence North 399 08' 13" West 84016 feet to the,e3westerly lime of said Toot 3; • thence South 4° 37' 13" East 271074 feet ,xi,iong said westerly line to the point of beginning, rs' v 6 f ' IM1 ?'f1 ,.•:�IIIYYrir t 1 1 { redr 7 'f . "t F� a a *a Cr1 •ki 'w•r r -(7O7OA t? b a +' 6% r�4r■ 1 \ 400 4 .. f ��l$A'). ',T T.,, aN.�+.• .4�'� .,..i r � � n O' hDI '43AC .., k ,rM , , t�'r " t,�'r Yaa�`,, `• ' s I K.i,. A II r d` • Q ' 1,„f,'A�. 't l' ( IIa r r4 ti.,Affet.l r ,r , it gp, °° `_ . i'' +” .� n a''G r a w,+" I 1 id,. rs N I'. ,l, my ,A, I x^ 1 a « .. 4r:,' r+ • l/I,� /� s,,'t••1 C',�, I Ka:I ,FFYMIiF „r. - ^ 444+++ 0. s�, (i' 1 t ti•li b 1 !�«.+. ar , j -, ti -'"f 1a';",t1�1Y' .,",y,,,,2. ,.:1 413 'rr ' A� sly. ' `X ': �`�`� 20p "I••y A • ,#1 •l ci '1+ trM I ' t 1Z:oo4 M '" .a ''&111? f•t•I ,41.,t� a • T 41 d_,Le 1.*. .�nafR` p,17 +i,r*1{I, f�14 � ili� *i / 6.46 '3" , ,I:r,;, „4' • r ti ,; ietr ■rrl I 'n .�:K7i',,,1,,,',.e.{.4, y4yr tiro✓ sr. c �« f �,r. ti, 4 a� � �' (�� _� dr'tKta« tC•SI No,11945) / • I".*4;,f•,,,:"�I •'°' r rKtF gr.,, • • ,. / ,s1 rllf l �,Za'9E{I+yKT rn^��{t'1Y 1• t, (�•, y�• 1 l.,.�'i s 71 1�x f t 11141 ■• ,,,,, • / ;III q) V j'�+yt 1''44.iii 8k 1'. s . e: / + .'«4 I "ill 4A>r"r':F {w {�1�r w G • ,j '," 4' �'1 fb1/f '•\� +� + S t N yr y G r; 1 � • , ,Y a f.•A'ar, r I f'44 1'i 0 r rl{ ,17.(i4c ''A I ��, 44 35 ., ',A ., +*• f,4' ..' II tF440,?y,"�r1.0 iii. y a., a ,it,1 r r ',D ' `'".)1.,' �' to r%;w 1�'1'7.:p'�.r J",,. v , ' ' .i k '"wAr p.1 f'Pii� ±i'I' 1 ti, i ,' { j , w• I I f rll'1't144' : rf w {, '....r.•:.,. d u ` ►1 ri�q t4?!yx1jr A^I„r•,1 I : t � ►, P °t O r f �• y ,�,y7f 41 . o q 1a r�,+r ” ra ,�a,+, «.. CO :/ n 4,`tir . v tiI ;S 46.11,,,'**1 4.r j'i1,* " "'P,t''' ▪ / ` t, : / :4▪; / , , ,.' 4 " ''Aii A.,-.' . .p,,t w, reorieii"e ro S «e; i d+a r ' ,s a �ye" , „� z0 ` ' Y t# ,2200 x r / �r ,ti i v. A.' 3,80 Ac °6zs Y"� t...,; ; �'u'" ° f° ir r N ,� ,d� z 1 . ThL s ta ,i,...6 an yot aid h , ; j k r r� r b / , £ at ite4 /41nce ' i ,'.., a , „,:yy y 1e r . W " ?' e. r Sp� . l � N ..l JtL a a .Ce. # a'• ”. ` + l I• rl4rl+A . 1 fir, .� • , ee At p s eilev W ,s"'.1:4:?. ` '.'"' le e.oLe ; le CoItpcuy ciAz tutie,6' 04l i;°, M,.r,4 . ; ?.1 ha liabLIy tick any £ohs by .c., t r,,li : . , ,• , 0 , t ➢ � ,a r ` . .ean oil )tatahce theheakt f � *4 1' f a 0►, , „�yy �" �S 1 t 9�FkG0 TITLE CE GJMArY 1 r ':410 1r„r AP - rk, �� 4,s, OREGON X a" ' A, itvi try?30 c 4 )ve Y NC - r 04 '4 4,4 I 4' ,' y ',•di, +8 tit ! laarter+r , •.. ^ p i brya •• A• « 5 / dry , { ii' '+ j )It t V �Q + " 4't• !f'iJ � 74 3k», f ,, . ' r , S ,,. • ....ye. , 1 rA �4' d r w. i' I t G b ti'T�++l t*{ 4 a ftr • 1 I "A " At 1 rq'' RM41 a i •' t `C S No. 132291` � ' . , ' *A,7.'.;�4a"A � I ,. Y �' r i`�� .## y ti a r O � `r rq 1 U YAi I ' .I . 1� y +Lt� Ay' Nq4y I M j. ,•MM w..•,,,,.,r:*r.a.. .q IM1fN�N•.+f.+ih:..M+W / s h �xm : n.a f K „�.... .... ...w«,,,.,.nr -.. - ,wweuw.."�M1'4h+tk'+.1yrk°�:l�gfP,k..L.Y..:!,.r tt:..::in«,;'-Ca."...4a.r••:+c+>,+r fi' - / — . ---,--—--11,— '.-—— — .. — ——— -- ------- - -- , • ___........,_ ... , ................... ( L SiL f . . : -.. +I v ' -t-1416kL.Lik, ' CI '''' '-'"' ,Of 111,1'A WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON . . , . March 3, 1980 Stephen T. Janik, Attorney . '.., . . Law Offices 900 SW Fifth Avenue 4 Portland, Oregon 97204 Reference: 1) Letter from J. D. Bishop to Planning Director, dated 2/11/80 * 2) Letter" from Planning Director to J. B. Bishop, dated 2/12/80 3) . Letter from Stephen T. Janik to Planning Director, dated 2/23/80 ' . . . . . . . Dear Mr. Janik: „ • „. In response to your letter of February 23, 1980,. concerning Western Oregon Mariner please understand that this City should not'be'Placed between Mr. Bishop and Mr. Reid. It is obvious that Mr. BishoP'would like to find a way to A break the lease agreement with Mr. Reid and Western Oregon Marine, but I do not think tha,twe.should be made a part of this disagreement. . “ In your opinion, Western Oregon Marine had violated the Tigard Zoning Code. , s 1 stated in my letter' to H . Bishop, dated February 12, 1980, that Western Oregon Marine has operated on tax lot 1300 at 12580 SW Main Street, Tigard, Oregon 97223, since 1969 - 1970 as a marine operation with sales, service, arid'outside storage. In my opinion, the code has not been violated. The landscaping that was done was "cosmetic" in nature, (i.e., tree triramix19 and clean-141) o The grading was done, but did nt..' violate the code nor did ^ it require a pernit. The graveling was done, and did not require a permit : There Was no necessity to require Site Design Review on the part of the City. ..1 . . Al el . Aldace No HoWard , Planning Director . AN8vmc . • ) cc Mr. a, B. BiShop; MX'. T. Reid, Western Oregon Marine; Mr. J. B. Bailey, -.,.. City Attozney 1 . I420 S.W. 'MIN P.O. BOX 23397 MAP!), OREGON 97223 PHt 639-4111 , ---a,. 1, if .µ STOEL' , RIVES, BOLJE'ST, FRASER AND WYsE (DAVIES,BIGGS,STRAYER,STOEL AND 'BOLEY) (RIVES,SONYHADI & SMITH) • ALLAN R.ABRAVANEL ROBERT H.HUNTINGT N LAW OFFICES . JEFFREY MICHAEL ALDEN STEPHEN T.JANIK RICHARD E.ALEXANDER ELMA JEREMIAH 900 S W FIFTH AVENUE RICHARD D.BACH R PH90N . PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 CaltnaePAULL.BOLEY • ERN EST BONYHADI JOEL D.KUNTZ DETER E.MARTIN PHILLIP D.CHADSEY WILLIAM M.McALLISTEF DAVID L,DAVIES �'.. MARRY 9,CHANDLER CHARLES J.McMURCHIE HUGH L,BIGGS CLEVELAND C.CORY GEORGE K,MEIER,M (503)224-3380 """' KAREN K.CREASON DAVID P.MILLER GAIL L.ACHTERMAN SUSAN M.HAMMER THOMAS P.DEERING GREGORY R.MoWE CHARLES F ADAMS NORMAN b.HOLLY JOHN DETJENS,117 HARDY MYERS STEPHEN E.BApsoN PAMELA L.JACKLIN ■ BARNES H.ELLIS THOMAS R.NICOLAI MARGARET M.BAUMGARDNER PETER R.JARVIS EDWARD L.EPBTEIN MILO E.ORMSETH Februar 23 198 0 Y / WILLIAM A.BERG GREGORY F JENNER HoWARb M.FEUERSTEIN TERRENCE R.PANCOAST JOHN F.BRADACH JENNIFER J.JOHNSON ,.i RICHARD A.I"RANZKE.. MARK H.PETERMAN HENRY C.BREITHAUPT CHARLES S.LEWIS,m GEORGE H.FRASER CAMPBELL RICHARDSON MATTHEW W,CHAPMAN DENNIS LEYBOLD GEORGE N.GALLOWAY ROBERT L.RIDGLEY BERTRAND J.CLOSE GREGORY H.MACPHERSON LEONARD A.GIRARD GEORGE DRIVES NANCY L,COWGILL SUSAN F.MANbIBERG WILLIAM J.DLASGOW RICHARD E.ROY C.PAUL DAGLE WILLIAM E.MERRITT GERSHAM GOLDSTEIN JOHN M.SCHWEITZER E,JOSEPH DEAN THOMAS H.NELSON , A RONALD S.GROSSMANN PATRICK J.SNMPSON CHRISTINE L,DICKEY MARGARET HILL NOTO CHARLES HABERNIGG HUGH ROBERT F.H.HARRINGTON THOMAS MB.STOEL RANRDL R. ER HIC,POSTER� BRUCE K.pOsEY Y JOHN R.HAY MANLEY B.sTRAYER ANDREW R.GARDNER OUY A.RANDLES RICHARD A.HAYDEN,JR. JERE M.WEBB SUSAN P.GRAISER LOIS O.ROSENBAUM DAVID G.HAYHURST CLARENCE R.WICKS DAVID W,GREEN STEVEN SCROGGIN HENRY H.HEWITT MARCUS WOOD STEPHEN L.GRIPPITH ,LAMES RAY STREINz CHARLES F.HINKLE WILLIAM W.WYSE THOMAS O.P.GUILBERT ANN E.THOMPSON • Mr. Aldie Howard Planning Director r.:' City of Tigard 12420 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 ', Dear Mr. Howard: Re: Western Oregon Marine `This is to advise you that we are legal counsel to Ltd. and one of its general partners, • Main Street Development, Mr. J. B. Bishop. Mr. Bishop is the contract purchaser of ` Talc Lot 1300, Which is presently occupied by Western Oregon Marine under a lease. i i p Western Oregon Marine, inM our Bopinioni, isd violationaof the City of Tigard Zoning Code in two particular respects: �., ] . Landscaping, grading, and graveling has occurred on I the portion fTax Lot 1300 without design review approval by 1 City 'gard, and 2. open boat storage has occurred, which is neither a permitted nor conditional use in the applicable C-3M zone. I have received a copy of your surprising response to Mr. Bishop; dated February 12, 1980. This is to advise you of the following: 1. as�'ou state in your letter that. a.� of 1974, Western Oregon Marine Was using this area° for ° arine sales and ,,, services" and that, upon its retoning, these activities became nonconforming Uses, you should be aware of the fact 4 r fir • STOEL,RIVES,BOLEY,FRASER Ail')WYSE • Mr. Aldie Howard February 23, 1980 • Page 2 • that these activities which you allege were occurring in 1974 occurred on Tax Lot 1200, that these activities were abandoned on Tax Lot 1200 due to a 1977 fire, that these activities were not occurring on Tax Lot 1300 in 1974 , and are, thus, not valid non-conforming uses. • 2. Your reference to a Comprehensive Plan change on other property obtained by Stevens Marine is irrelevant to this case unless by this reference you are suggesting that Western Oregon Marine should similarly attempt to obtain such a plan change. 3. your decision that no design review approval was necessary for the grading, graveling, and landscaping work conducted is not authorized by Section 18.59. 030 of the Tigard Zoning Code, which requires Design Review for Such activities. I do not know what authority you are relying upon to grant, withoUt a public hearing, waivers from the Tigard Zoning Code. We have today advised Western Oregon Marine that their activities are in breach of their lease and we intend li to enforce their obligations under the lease. We trust that Your analysis of this situation will be revised in light of the above facts and that, if a violation of the City of Tigard Zoning Code exists, appropriate enforcement action will be Commenced. If you have any questions , please give me a call. Very t?? ,o 11 410(4K et It STJ:gb cc: Mr. J. B. Bishop Mt, Hera Buchholz Mr. 11. D. Bailey, City Attorney I. , --.•.- - - - -. . ■■ . , 1 ) J. •• 'Igg ala ZATlit k ( ( I • I r A rn ,,,r.04,....i., olri%A, ' . . . t -:• `h- CITY OF TIGARD' . P.O.f3ox 23397 - 4) . 12420 S.W.Main Tigard,Oregon 97223 . , . , , , February 12, 1980 J B Bishop 10505 SW Barbur Blvd. 4303 , Portland, Oregon 97219 . Reference: Western Oregon Marine , . Dear Mr. Bishop: • In 1969 - 1970, Western Oregon Marine was operational on SW Main Street and ' , at that time a marine operation with outside storage, sales, etc. was an allowed use in a C-3 zone. In 1974, when the NPO 41 put forward their proposed land use designation, this area was zoned C-3M "Main Street Commercial" and • . marine sales and services were removed from the permitted and con ' al uses. This does not change the fact that Western Oregon Marine was an out4 ' Ao permitted use up to 1974, and as they have continued to operate at th 6A ' location, I consider them to be a permitted use today. As a matter oi Mr. Stevens, Stevens?-Marine, was allowed a Comprehensive Plan change f , marine sales/service outlet on Burnham Street in 1979 and the C-3M zone xl , allows this as a conditional use. • When Mr. Tom Reid requested permission to move a portion of his operation back to the Main Street site, I saw no problems. Why shoUldn9t he be allowed • tO Continue operating at a location which from 1969 had been used for marine sales and service? I didn't see any reason to request a Site Design Review for this location. ( As a matter of fact, the real unsightliness is now you.e responsibility as and You own ll Of the surrounding property and have an option on the marine building. When and if your proposed development takes place, we Will try to upgrade this entire area. The entail amount Of site Work done by Mr. Reid is not a problem. It is My feeling that this site has been a marine outlet since 1969, and I see no evidence of non-Conformance to the Code as it pertains to the historic • status of this site. Your,- xiii • goer Aldie Ro , P1 ng birector '■ 4 ,, ARVmd cc: Tot Reid i Western Oregon Marine e. t.,•• HbWard bit-etiCh Attorney I lit e d)41)1Le i.444 tri„l't 1‘,4,4t 1-t A ed ed6;z -**21.e?ed. net,' 0, 1•.4(1,j • - • JB Bishop 10505 SW Barbur Blvd, #303 Portland, OR 97219 - February 11 . 1980 Aldie Howard Planning Director City of Tigard Tigard, OR 97223 %( I78 Dear Aldie: Re Western Oregon Marine This is to advise you that I am the Lessor with an, option to purchase the property now leased to Western Oregon Marine and located on the southeast side of Main Street ' at 12580 SW Main Street in Tigard. This property is sub- ject to a lease to Western Oregon Marine which, among other things, requires that the lessee use the property in strict conformance with all applicable governmental rules and regulations , • It has come to my attention that Western Oregon Marine has engaged in grading, gravelling, landscaping, open boat • storage, and related activities on this property, and that Western Oregon Marine intends or may intend to continue ' these activities and to expand its open boat storage activity and may engage in retail boat sales, It is my understanding that these landscaping, grading, gravelling and boat storage activities have occurred without the issuance of a grading permit and a design review permit . In addition, it is my Understanding that open boat storage and retail boat sales, should this be occurring, are not outright permitted or - conditional uses in the C-3M zone, which applies to this property, This is to advise you that it is my intention to require that Western Oregon Marine strictly comply with all applicable provisions , as is their obligation per the terms of the lease currently in force, of the toning and design review ordinances of the City of Tigard in connection With conducting its acti- vities on this property and that , in my opinion, there has not been compliance with these ordinances to date , In responce to this communication, I would expect to receive a notice of any application filed With your office for design review approval by Western Oregon Marine or any other related applications which affect this property, In addition, I would also ask that you conduct an investigation of the activities on this property to determine if you agree with my opinion that violations now exists ti • Aldie Howard page two • • • Therefore, I would appreciate it if you would please notify me upon the filing of any such applications so that I may participate in the review and determination of an application and advise me o-f the results of your investigation. Tf you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, 2./ JB Bishop • 246-5469 • • JBB c t • • • J ' d i • i 4 i. ...:.. ......... ..,:-.ter. ,:.,..,... .�.•..,�.+r a.^.1 a ,...uu,M...».ai.,....,,a+..,... � � ��. .,wtrae,a_.. s,,,.«.„.. w.,,�.t.n,M�t.,.,y,«.,m.,««, „. ..- ••�{nrnrvan.us.•r-sz^y.-�' '"u.«..w:q ., « ti . FORM No 671E(Escrow) C 0 pp EAR N ESJI 0 N EY R - PT I Stevens•Ness Law Publishing Co.© • ' ,,,,sr i • : a�is Portland,Oregon 97204 TB City / !�"� Stp F'"'' , ' , 19 e .'" ' RECEIVED FROM r- ✓''.4 f%'yr/�r�' .'1'1t.i___ , fs J}I , 1 J —, ', , A « •r.. _ „4 ,„._____ k (hereinafter cater d urchaser ;' f .e sum o _ __.. / � „.41.:.,--' ?” w ,.& -=--- ”. - -C Ilars 1$ ,i . , the form of .r , as earnest money and in port payment for the purchase of the flowing ddperibed real�tate�situated,In the City of _,.74,E -L County of (.4.,../14/ -.�'''r� ,State of '.�''i'"__ _to•Wit: f .�/ .s r' .._.... which we have this day sold to said purchaser r the sum of k /— it .�'�. /«.r:. -i , �� -Dollars I$--i�• �1 1 I the following terms,t.•witi The sum,hereinabove receipted for,of Dollars 1$ -` r' �'"" 1; j 10n, �___.____ ,,19_____ ,as additional earnest mone ,the sum of� Dollars,'$ 1; , 1 On owners acceptance, • ooh acceptance of title.,aad delivery of * � f� '�' 1'i;-:_ ;Dollars IS , _c I '� 1; � •� ,,.... J r,.� y,•. j , Df$ �'r dance of . " rya e as follows: 411r,./-.4.' •'j 1` 41_.__+40++ � z..r ,' /fir .. 5 O we e' I' ri T.7_ 4 . i _ Al• . �.r:r.+' �`'I 'r ?G, .7'" G r .�' ' 4) e�r� �, _. Cf.ie� -,,.. -r. c,_' `? �"-.r: , 'rr vo '' ,"r' ... ,�!7-r-v •, J .4 : v:, " _ �. ,)*,1 4/4 : ' ', ."'`' i title isurance policy from a reliable company Insuring mo'ketable title In seller is to be furnished purchase :n due course at seller s expense;preliminary to closing,seller may furnish t"'' ce c a ri re ing its willingness to Issue title Insurarite,which shall be conclusive evidence as to seller's record title: ;' is gree tat(Fs f f d s n approve this sale within the period allowed broker below in which to secure seller's acceptance,or if the title to the sold premises is not insurable or market. I e, or cannot be made so within thirty'days after notice containing a written statement of defects is delivered to seller,the said earnest money shall be refunded.But if said sale is approved seller and title to the said premises is Insurable or marketable and purchaser neglects or refuses to comply with any of said conditions within teh days after the sale evidence of title is furnished ' d to make payments promptly,Os hereinabove set forth,then the earnest money herein receipted for'including said ddditionol earnest money)shall be forfeited to seller os liquidated damages ; ' d this contract thereupon shall be of no further binding effect. i The property is tb be conveyed by n•soffl ent deal • ••: clear of all I and encumbrances except zoning ordinances, building and use restrictions, reservations in Federal , ' dents,easements cr record and,_ i.r ,.►T ' .M . i 4. All 'rrigarlon, plumbing and heating fixtures and equip ent (Including stoker and oil tanks but excluding fire plate fixtures and equipment), water heaters, electric lvjht fixtures, I 'it bulbs and fluooeScenf lamps,bathroom fixtures,veneti nds,drapery and curtain rods,window and door screens, storm doors arid windows, attached linoleum, attached television ' ; •enna,oil shrubs and trees and all fixtures except ..'.- __ " t t eft upon the premises as port of the property purchased.The following personal property is also included as a part of the property for said purchase price: ' 1 '�%,4',G'� _ ••,iler and purchaser agree to pro rate the foxes which are due and'payable for the current tax year, Rents, interest, premiums for existing insurance and other matters shall be pia rated ors a ,, lendar year basis,Adlustments are to be made as of the date of the consummation of scud sale or delivery of possession,whichever first occurs.Encumbrances to be discharged by seller may be '.lid at his option out of purchase money at dote of closing. SELLER AND PURCHASER AGREE THAT SUBJECT SALE WILL BE CLOSED IN ESCROW.THE COST OF WHICH SHALL BE BORNE CO. 1UALLY BETWEEN SELLER AND PURCHASER. • .A Potsetsion of said premises it to be delivered to purchaser on or before "'�." ,.19 ,or as Soon thereafter as existing laws and regulations will permit removal of tenants, , •, y• binding upon `tors and attignt of buyer and`seller.However,the purchaser s rights herein to Time is the.essence of this contract, This contract is b(ndin u on the heirs, executors,odmin(,trotors yuccas not asttgnable without Written consent of teller.In any suit or actlnh brought on this contract,the lasing party therein agrees to pay the prevailing party therein III the prevailing party's ' • sonable attorney s fees in such sut or action to be fixed by the hial court,and 12)on appeal if any,similar ees,.Jrhthe appellate to court,t ,kit fixed by the appellate court, .�� pp court, 1 r �. ,� e-"#-r" C t' G'd � /2,0:7---<>" .. .3 J z'; c"'2,�-` 'ti~ , ,Broker • . , dress w AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE ,T� /....'-' 7 .,1 w.- C 'l . I hereby agree to our Else the property herein described in its present condition and fo pay the price of S , as set forth above and grant to said • .nf a period of days hereafter fo j ure4elIet acceptance« � ere , during.which period my offep JShall not be subject to revocati. . Said deed or contract to be ome of_,� ,/ 1 .�' 4 --=, " 'i �'�Pujrchase .►"'-■rte !w� '.- ,.s r 4,t " #.,,!Egli v r , rip ...,. � � _. I`Ammar - �`r�. AGREEMENT TO SELL `"... "" :' '' 19 C�•,'Y r� i i hereby approve arid,9cce`i the'sole of above described property find the price and eo in ton r id ree t rfvrnith e jdence of title at above provided, a ltett the said deed when i:ftltedwp p'p"y p Seller. forth in "", r n titans as Set r r , i j CHASER,Either manth11y or by r Istered mall Y-.copy •' ', Ing seller's acceptance, r ' AVER 1'ROMfaTlit TO PURCHASER, er itjo rig drown el t recei t of the fore ain, in'f`�`eht 'ring it n t•e 4n, that of the Copy hereof showing Seller''signed occeplance tent purchaser by registered Pu ch 'r n howled e p g q i� beg g V md(I to purchasers above address "E' „�,; ,, „t) Purchaser 1Rrefurn receipt requrstedl on .. 1/...:-...._ r•�j arum receipt told received Lr' _,�! ,fir f and attached to broker's cop y. 1/.:___-_, inwrv.A►� Lwr^_____rerJ ;' — SELLER'S CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS I9� I agree to pay forthwith to the above horned broker a conimittion d ourttin td, for sere cps,siuuferdd_ui.,t it irantdetian In lie event of d forfeiture of • deposit as above provided, the Said deposit shall be aid to or retained by the broker o the extent of the gr' ! t si ue In the tel I authorize'did broker ,,,., ,,, .a out of the o�tpsh proceeds of sale the eir ense of furnishing evidence of title,of retarding ,t:and revenuj,,stamps,iiff d y,�commission rtyy err urtibrontes on Said premises payable by me , y eiosink I acknowledge receipt of�a copy of this eatnett money receipt bearing y gnat sVbnd that of the purchaser hunted above . " or NOTES IPH ANY bLANNk SPACES ARE 1NSUKPiCIENT USE 5.N NO, 810 "'" S+eUin►�```v;; _. __. .. _ •. . • . , SELLER.DY PAD , 70 BE SEPARATELY SIGNED BY BUYER AND I s.. 512 • sirs tke Wf•IaNkArt A 014A/sale Hot APPLIcAsL.B ESCetoW coPY ,; .. ,. r ,, nnra..vaw.n7+-• ewe+k.A,.,r1++.unrNIM.V.al,.q..?t»+:?m.•«yn.+.,.—.. .".- ...., .,«y.+..re.=•_.�.,SIW' , :-•• H/F'kP+: :iRllfiYri 9iI�bU�+LSS;G i°' °a 4-4:1441,, y ej 4,07- /34e0 LEASE OPTION AGREEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That ROBERT A. LEEDY lc% and ROBERT A. LEEDY, JR. , as Trustees under the Last Will and Testament of CORA M. REA TRUST, hereinafter called "Lessors" , do hereby lease, let and demise unto JB BISHOP, as "Lessee" , that certain real property situated in the State of Oregon, County of Washington, as described on Exhibit "A" which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. TO HAVE AVD TO HOLD the same unto Lessee for a term of Twelve (12) months from and after February 1, 1980, upon - fl the following terms and conditions: 1. This lease is subject to existing lease in favor of Boaters-Sav-Club, Inc. , under which Western Oregon and Marine Sports Center, Inc. , has succeeded to the Lessee' s interest. Lessee accepts possession subject to said prior lease, shall be entitled to receive any rentals accruing thereunder after the effective date hereof, and shall fulfill Lessors' responsi- bilities under the existing lease in all appropriate respects, Insofar as Lessors are concerned said present Lessee shall be regarded as the sublessee of JB Bishop as Lessee hereunder. The rental hereunder which the Lessee covenants and agrees to pay to the Lessors is the sum of $1, 350.00 monthly commencing February 1, 1980, and payable monthly in advance throughout the term hereof, but subject to prior termination or adjuStment Under the further provisions hereof. Page 1 - LEASE OPTION AGREEMENT . *4. ugtzt:,;.c. b • By separate agreement, Lessors have agreed to exchange a 40% interest in the leased property, Exhibit "A" hereto, with Lessee for other rental real property. Such agreement contemplates • the acquisition by Lessee of a 40% ownership interest in the sub- ject property. At the time of completion of such exchange, the monthly rental payable to the Lessors hereunder shall be reduced by 40% to the sum of $810. 00 monthly. Said reduction shall be prorated as to any partial month involved. Following such exchange, but only if the same occurs, the Lessee shall be required to purchase Lessors' remaining 60% of said described real property for the sum of $96, 000 under installment contract sale payable in equal quarterly installments over a term of Eight (8) years with payments including interest upon the unpaid balance, at ten percent (10%) per annum with right of prepayment without penalty of not more than 25% of the original principal balance in any calendar year. The purchase by Lessee shall be closed by the execution of an installment land sale cohtract in standard form requiring Lessee, as Purchaser, to Pay the Purchase price above specified in installments as above set forth; Said contract shall also require Lessors, as Sellers, to provide Lessee, as Purchaser, with a purchaser's policy of title insUrance in the sum of $960000 showing marketable title free and clear of ces excepting zoning and building ) 1 restrictions, current year's taxes and the aforesaid prior lease. Said land purchase contract shall also contain a provision requiting LeSsors, Upon reqUest by LeSsee, as Purchaser, to convey said 60% interest in the subject premises to Lessee, as Purchaser, against the execution and delivery by Lessee, as Page 2 - LEASE OPTION AGREEMENT • p**, Purchaser, to Lessors, as Sellers, of a promissory note for the then balance payable with interest in the same manner as afore- said and secured by a first mortgage upon said 60% interest in • the subject property together with a security interest in Lessee- Purchaser's 50% undivided interest in an additional parcel of real property as described on Exhibit "B" hereto, subject to prior first mortgage and lease. to Bank of Oregon. Said mortgage shall further require Lessors, as Mortgagee thereunder, upon request by Lessee-Purchaser-Mortgagor, to subordinate the lien of •r said mortgage to a blanket first mortgage which Lessee contem- plates giving for the development of the leased property and adjoining property. Upon the completion of such purchase this instrument shall terminate. If the contemplated exchange shall not occur, then Lessee' s right and obligation to purchase shall not come into existence, and his rights shall terminate upon expiration of A the term hereof on JanuarY 31, 1981. • In addition to the prescribed rental it shall be Lessee' s responSibility hereunder to pay all real property taxes accruing or allocable to the property during the term hereof and to keep the premises insured against loss by fire with extended coverage with loss payable to Lessors and Lessee as their interests may, from time to time appear. (Payment of such taxes and insurance premiums is presently the obligation of Western Marine under the prior lease. Lessee shall not bring about a terMination of the existing prior lease without te8sors' prior Written consent until and unless Lessee shall have ) Page 3 - AS OPTION AGREtMtNT ft , ft,„ Ar% * purchased the property. Until so terminated Lessee, as sub- lessor, with respect to said prior lease shall keep and perform all of the obligations of Lessor thereunder and shall hold Lessors harmless on -"r',unt of his failure to do so in any respect. ) the term hereof, Lessee may put the premises 1 , to any lawful use as he may desire, subject to the rights of Western Marine as the present Lessee. Upon the completion of the exchange of property hereinabove referred to, whereby Lessee is to become a 40% owner of Vr ' subject premises, then at such time this lease shall be applicable only to Lessors' remaining 60% ownership of said premises. Upon the expiration of the term hereof, or the sooner termination, without the contemplated exchange having taken place, ownership and right of possession to the subject premises shall revert to the Lessors with all rights of the Lessee, as Lessee, having been terminate di and unless the existing prior lease to Western Marine shall have been terminated with the consent of Lessors, the reversion shall be subject to the rights of said prior Lessee. Time is of the essence hereof and if the Lessee ),? hereunder shall fail to keep and perform all of the conditions hereof by him to be perfotmed, including the payment of presctibed rental on or before 10 days after the same becomes due, the Lessots shall have the right to terminate this lease or to exercise such of remedies as may be afforded by law. 1 Page 4 - LEASE OPTION AGREEMENT b . In the event of suit or action hereon or to enforce any rights hereunder, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover his reasonable attorneys' fees therein or upon appeal therefrom. This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of" the heirs, executors, administrators and successors and assigns of each of the parties hereto. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused these presents to be executed this 9 day of Eeit1/2, c`-,. , 1980. CORP,. M. REA TESTAMENTARY TRUST, LESSOR • • • 817 ,Ire"')- •1 Trustee • By ..44A Trustee JB"BISHOP, LES E • ;4 F. • i Page 5 - LEASE OPTION A( R.EEMENT .�._.'"�.... ..,..•..wa..+..u+ H,«o,,.-.dr.uo*...:.:... ... ...;-......._._:.t ....;...:......_......ew.-..w............_:o=..........w,a+..+m rA`rty. v7S3'Cwstilt«s!S�".W..,k. , 24' .ttleg,r4),r2rAlgtzt,‘‘ c • , birovik TIGARD • CITY OF TIGARD P.O.Box 23397 12420 S.W. Main Tigard,Oregon 97223 December 19 1979 / 7- 2/12 f Mr. J. B. Bishop 10590 SW Cook Lane • , Tigard, Oregon 97223 ( ) Li Dear Mr. Bishop: This letter will be a review of my conversation of this date with you and Mr. David Kehle relative to the Main Street Development - G.I. Joes. !'? First: No review of any proposal will be carried out unless you provide proof of ownership for each and every parcel of land involved. This will be provided by 1 current insured Title Report furnished to me including lease agreements. Second: No review of any proposal will take place until formal application • is mace and the appropriate fees are paid. Third: The impact of this project on the development of Main Street and the surrounding axea dictates that you shall request a C-3M/PD designation and appear before the Tigard Planning Commission. Special attention to the floodplain areas and transportation network should be given. Fourth: You shall provide the necessary public tight-of-way dedications to compliment the City's traffic circulation plan in this area. This will include provision for re-alignment of in Street and the connection • of Johnson to Ash Street. The dedication of public rights-of-way may be as much as eighty (80') feet W), on Main Street and sixty (60') feet on Johnson to Ash. Full Street improvements Will be your responsibility. Your revised Traffic Study will indicate Whether or not warrants can be met for additional traffic signals. ..... is very easy for you to spot G.I. Joes on your property our respoiLsibii. ty is to the City generally. YOU shodld direct your architeCt to design around the public facilities. My Staff Report toil' inclUde these concerns and I Will expect you to address these concerns prior to your Planned. DeVelOpment aPPlicat1011- tours trill 0 Ho P1 Ing Dir.lotor Al/vmc cc: M . bavid Kehle, Architect r l MEMORANDUM OF CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered this 4th day of December , 1979, effective as of November 1, 1979, by and between MICHIYE VALENZUELA, hereinafter referred to as "Seller", and a B. BISHOP, JR. , hereina2ter referred to as "Buyer". • W I T N E S S E T H: That in consideration of the payment by Buyer to Seller of the full amount of the purchase price on that certain • Contract entered into by the parties her.,ueo on November 1, 1979, Seller agrees to sell and convey to Buyer, and Buyer agrees to purchase and Acquire of and from Seller, all of the teal property in Washington County, State of Oregon, described as follows: fi A portion of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 2,' Township 2 South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, described as follows: Beginning No. th 46° 27' East 144.7 feet from a stake in the middle of Darrow Ferry Road South 44° 15' East 30 feet from the northeast corner of • The George k'rewing land on the north line of George Richardson Donation Land Claim No: 55 in Section 2; Thence. South 43° 47' East 49 feet to the east= erly right-of-way line of the present West side of the Pacific Point ig hway and the true point of beginning, said true of beginning being the northwest corner of that certain traot of land described in •, Hook 138, Page 55:6, Deed Records; thence South 440 11' East along the north boundary line of said tract of land described in Book 138, Page 556, a distance of 200 feet; thence North 45° 49' East 100 feet;the easterlyeboundaryhiine of West to a point on of a Pacific the present West side tha fiighwa�j• thence o foot radius n a 1830 foo curve left in a Southerly direction al . ig the east- ? erly r,. ght-d+f-way line of the West side of the Pacific Highway,, 100.8 feet to thi true point of beginning. . 4 11 la. 1. t •a.+,.N.+*ee•.nd;nmenr rwr ^ww•-.+-..a.+w:+_ ir- (: The true and actual consideration paid for this transfer, stated in terms of dollars, in One Hundred Mighty-Five Thousand Dollars ($185,000.00) . Until a change is required, all tax statements shall � • be Sent to J. B. Bishop, Jr. , 10505 S.W. Barbur Blvd., #303 P { Portland, Oregon 97219. 4; IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Memorandum of Contract to be executed in duplicate on the date above written. SELLER: BUYER: fr ICHIYE r' i LEN7UELA, B. BISHOP/ STATE OF OREGON ) STATE OF OREGON ) ss. ) ss. County of Washington ) Count, of [jiaahington ) December December November 4 , 1979. Nov.ambox 1979 • This personally appeared This personally appeared the above namedMichiyeValenzuela, the above named, B. Bishop, , .. and acknowledged the foregoing Jr. , and acknowledged the fore- instrument to be her own voluntary going instrument to be his own act and deed. voluntary act and deed. Before me / Before me /'"' Notary Public or Oregon otary Public for Oregon My p` / / My Commission Expires:, M Commission E;� a.re�: 11 3 60 11/3/80 • A x y 1 +{ I Oft "y, ;r w. .. N w f dj 1, 9• !' • l y, , 4,. j I. r. y P i' Mainstreet development, Ltd. Soils and Foundation investigation G. I . Joe's Shopping Center Main Street @ Pacific Hwy. • Tigard, Oregon ,! L. J r .•- , ( • .. • • a s .1--'''''.,1'. ...4.,,,.,,A,,,,,), „„,,,,,,r,„ 'M..t...■4.s.1.72,Cha,04' .'t$t 9 1't.,'-‘7 '''1:1 r. ' "'"...,:.t&N , r { ri 1 +' ,p �, �i� 4 y,.ty ivor4 h i., 1 a rh 6 e t " t A Y 6k� � r1! d e 4116 N. l isslttippl Ave, ' Pottlarid, Ortigon 97217 e ///•����^^((RR II,,��•YY11RR 288- 08 1, X e"aarvm+!,,„. `n i«a i.�s•.c�. ......•.+.. .! x.�.i i e'.3�.,x.*ye s a<�wk"5+er=F*wMw�•?wN.tfCiWn.f.gTWAkT,Wy!°CnvifYtAf,W�i.t.wruwn,MaM.M.L-�«,..u.r� ,uq�, � •�� ,,,, .,",.•l L� � • --c,- NO y , Y r . • �• It 1 1ST TESTING LAORATO 16?, i.. 4115 N. MISSISSIPPI AVENUE P. O. O) 17126 No STR E TESTING • CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION MATERIALS INSPECTION P O R T IA N D, OREGON 9 7 2 1 7 WELDING CERTIFICATION SOIL TESTING CHEMICAL ANALYSIS • PHYSICAL TESTING ASSAYING Nov. 1 , 1979 Mainstreet Development, Ltd. Oregon Dairy Center Suite 303 • 10505 St,W. Barbur Blvd. Portland, Oregon 97219 Attention: Mr. Herm Buchhol tz Re: Soils and Foundation Investigation G. I . Joe's Shopping Center Main Street @ Pacific Hwy. Tigard, Oregon Gentlemen: At your request we have performed a soils and foundation investigation for a proposed G. I . Joe's Shopping Center to be located oh the south side of Main Street hear its junction with S.W, Pacific Hwy. in Tigard, Oregon. We ft.,. preseht herewith a report of our findings, conc'usions and recommendations. Site Description, I• p The site s a moderately-tolling, easterly-draining arcel measuring 443+ feet on Main Street by 822+ feet ih ,depth It is bounded oh the northwest by Main Street and on the remaining boundaries by undeveloped properties: The ground surface slopes to the north and east through a total topographic relief of 25 to 30 feet. Several wood frame structures are located hear the north- " western boundary; the remainder of the parcel is in tall field grass and a few trees. ) Subsurface F location In order to ascertain soil conditions, 12 test borings were made between • September 19-'24 1979; with a t ruck-tiiounted power auger. Boring locations arc >'J g , attached, ' 5 foot intervals to a shown h Figure 1 atlraci�..r . here taken at 2.• depth of 15 feat' and 5-foot intervals thereafter, using a 2 inch o.b. spl i t spoon 5aripler in conjunction with a Standard Penetration Test, The Standard • Mainstreet Develo ment, . Ltd -2- Site Investigation Penetration Test is performed by driving a 2-inch Q.D. split-spoon sampler into the undisturbed formation at the bottom of the boring with repeated blows of a 14+0-lb. pin-guided hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler a given distance is a measure of soil consistency. Samples wr'_re identified in the field, placed in sealed containers and transported to the laboratory for further classification and testing. Laboratory Tests Laboratory tests were performed on representative samples. These include natural water content, Atterber 9 i Limits and particle size distribution. Results of the tests are summari " -3-- ' Site investigetic'n Groundwater The local groundwater table was encountered in all borings at depths of 4 to 16 feet. We anticipate that groundwater would rise to within a foot' or two of the ground surface during a prolonged rainy season. Surface ponding of run- 1 off water during' heavy and prolonged precipitation will probably occur in the lower portions of the site Proposed Plans for Development We understand that plans call for the construction of a 210 by 290 foot retail structure with a number of satellite retail and restaurant facilities. Neither finished grades nor the types of construction and materials are known at this time. We anticipate, however, that concrete tilt-up construction will t : be considered for a portion of the site development. • Conclusions and Recommendations 1 . Adequate support for the proposed facilities will be found in the native silt/sand unit beneath this site, The initial step will entail the re- , moval of all sod or obviously loose and/or unsuitable materials, We anticipate that stripping to a depth of 6 to 8 inches below existing ground surface will suffice. Materials to be placed in structural fills should be spread in iliform lifts not exceeding 8 inches loose thick- ness, with each lift thoroughly compacted by meahs of repeated cover- ages of loaded haulirt units, heavy crawler tractors, and appropriate compaction equipment, We recommend against the use of vibratory rol- lers or light weight equipment for fine-grained materials. We point out that favorable weather will be required for operations in which fine-grained Materials are being used; consequently, it would be ad- , viable to conduct the site preparation during dry weather, hi the event that rainy weather prevails during site preparation, it would I, Mainstreet Development, Ltd. -4- Site Investigation ' 1. be necessary (1) to suspend operations, or (2) to bring the site to grade using free-draining materials. Structural fills should be cofi- • pacted' to 95 per cent of maximum density as determined by laboratory compaction tests AASIIO T-180. 2. Spread footings in the native silt/sand or structural tills may be designed for bearing pressures of 3000 psf. 3. Lateral earth pressures on foundation walls, retaining walls, etc. may be calculated on the basis of equivalent fluid pressure of 35 pcf for level backfi l 1. 4. All backfill ,•., •` retaining walls, foundation walls, etc. should be made with select granular material (sand and/or gravel) . We anticipate that oh-site material will notDbe suitable for this purpose. 5. Foundation Preparation inasmuch as the soil units which will provide (: support for the main structure are extremely sensitive to disturbance in the presence of excess moisture, care should be taken to protect pre- pared bearing surfaces until rooting concrete can be placed. Precautions to achieve this end would consist of (1) covering of prepared bearing sur- faces with impervious membranes or granular blankets (4-inch maximum thick- .,,' • Ness) or (2) cessation of work during rainy weather. 6. An adequate subsurface drain system should be installed behind all sub-. surface walls Surface water (from roof, parking and landscapilg) should be directed to a Storm sewer or other' approved disposal point. Under ho circumstances should storm water be led into subsurface drains. ha We recommend that asphalt 7. Asphalt pavement p � 1 t pavements be designed for ;. entrance and service roads of class 7 and for parking and all other areas, 1,0 } ,fa • w . .. ., M a n s t ree t peve l opine n t r Ltd. .�, -5- Site Investigation ,.�...,, g 7. Class 5. Pavement section should be designed for subgrade CBR of 4, which yields the following recommended thickness in accordance to Asphalt Institute Manu l MS1 Thickness Class 7__. Class 5 • Asphalt Pavement (Ore. St. Class C) 3 In. • 2 _ In. Crushed Rock Base (Oregon St. Spec.) 12 In. 8 In. Prior to placing base course the subgrade should be proof-rolled with a loaded dump truck to detect areas or pockets of unusually soft mat- erial These shoUld then be excavated and replaced with suitable coin- A / pacted fill . We shall be pleased to provide such additional ,assistance as you may request ( in corpleting the design ofythis structure and to furnish information or advice rA on unforeseen conditions during the construction phase. . Cert. No.21O265 cc: Williams € Gilham Repec1fuiiy submiiheci, Architects & Planners NORTHWEST TESTING LABORATORIES 3777 S5 MilWaukie Portianclg Oregoh ( p1 BY A, e C cafes R. doe, o onager 00,2/Z•�.A"Al pg 1'�l , A1(("` C`Iei l H i kot r room wA � y'�Y.ly�Ar♦ • yw.ns.. a„n aarm,,».i,.,-.a.».�:m.n...:...®w AMr,N:M..s,.e.R, .ra.;. ..s.. ;,y _• ;+ ,I«.,... .,......:.�,:..,.„ ..«y..,...»» r.:mvcp;aar.,n{e:y cratrEh...AwrA'+yj:C.t.-+s.. -n..a.}a...yu.w.;..:p. .a�,yy '. , , . , . , . . . , FrOJect: Meintteeet IhVestMents. Ltd, - 0.1, Joes, :ridrciLltuoll Depth. in Natural Moist, Liquid Plastic Plastic Borin9 No, §...121212-...2111L Feet COhteht % ' Limit Limit Index ,... B-9 2 2,5 - 4 31.2 ......, NP ..- 9 4 7,5 - 9 32.2 -- NP — 9 7 15 .. 16.5 33 J --, NP , • . . . . . . . . . Perqtcle St2e - % Retained #8., #16 #40 #100., #200 4-#200 ................. 13-9 2 2,5 - 4 0 0.2 1,3 3.6 9,7 12.2 77,0 9 4 7,5 - 9 0 0 0.1 0,3 20.7 27,3 91.6 9 7 15 . 16,9 0 0 0 0,5 25,4 38.0 38,8 , , 9 t (1). • Octbber 2, 1979 J. B. Bishop 10505 SW Barbur Blvd. Suite 303 Portland, OR 97219 Re: G.L. Joes Proposal to the City of Tigard Dear Sir: The Public Works Department and the Planning Department have had a chance to review the traffic study you submitted in reference to G.I. Joes proposed developmsnt on Main Street. Our primarf concern is traffic circulation service to this property, Traffic Counts compiled recently by us indicate 10,000 trips per day on Maim Street. C527.4 based their study on 8,000 trips per day. This is a bit annoying when we consider that already we are 2,000 trips per day over your figures and that your figures are 212122tions for 1985,and that includes normal growth plus i project grooth and that you still insist upon direct access to 99W at the south property line. The latter was discussed with you initially as being tnacteptable. In short, we are not in agreement with your proposed traffic circulation. We have discussed alternatives and have outlined a "general plan" on the enclosAd map. Note particularly the access/egress to the east to Ash Street, the Suggested egress to McKenzie Streets and the proposed area vide traffic program that we are contemplating. Due to the magnitude of this proposal and the fact that sensitive lands (flood plain) are involved, you will be required to appear before the Planninq Com- mission ior a zone change (C—3M P.D.). The issues involved and the tVOMOndouS impact yOut proposal will have on the entire Main Street area densnd that a public hearing be held. You will no doubt wish to discus this with use Please make an appointment ad we Will gladly consult with youi Yours truly, Planuing Director AH/PiP ghtl. , •111••••■11.1.0M111.1:M.... • ( 'lions and Stipulations Continued and Concluded A Page of This Poitcy) "'''4,04t414,*144#40404,4161i040#45P`r''''', 4:00041***084iiii'#k A97- SCHEDULE A, • Date of 12:16 P.M. Amount $ 295,000.00 Policy No. W 15573 K Policy September 5, 1979 Premium $ 760.00 1. Name of Insured • • MAIN STREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD. , an Oregon limited partnership. • 2. The estate or interest in the land described in this Schedule and which is covered by this policy is A Fee. • 8. The estate or interest referred, to herein is at Date of Policy vested in • MAIN STREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD, , • an Oregon limited partnership, •• 4. The 1an4 referred to in this policy is described as See following page. ii r of, •. , • • , , , :. •.i'',,„ ..., , , I. . . . . .. , .. . . . • . •\ ;,• •:, .' ...' . . , , . .. • . .. , , . ., . , • . •• ,•. . :.„„ ,,,, '''',,.,%.• ,•,-,,,,,,..'•,,, ',...•--..,,-,.... 74- (01 k ,, 1, 4 S•, - .... ,,.i,,,,',..,••••-',.,,,',:.:-,,portfolootooki0 ''.., ''' ,,,,.., ......,...•........• •.. . „.. i ' • ... , 7. .. . • . . . .• '.. 1 . . . ., . .. , Order No. W 15573 K .. , . H .7:. . . • . , DESCRIPTION . ., .., , ''. .• . . Beginning at a point on the southeasterly line of that certain ,. ,.. ,. tract of land conveyed by Deed. to Timothy Casey and Jane Casey, and . .. recorded in Hook 126, Page 330, Deed Records of Washington County, . ,• „, Oregon; said point being the most easterly corner of that certain one acre tract conveyed by Deed to Harry E. Strehier and Martha G. .. .. .Sttehler and recorded in Book 232, Page 277, Deed Records of Wash- 4ngtOn County, Oregon; running thence from said beginning. point, 7' . : North 43° 41' West, 491.73 feet to an iron pipe at the most north- ... , . ItlY corner Of said Strehler Tract; thence North 58* 39' East, 4011oVing the south-easterly Jane of State RighVay, 138.05 feet to „..r.., the southwesterly line of that certain, tract of land conveyed to , , "f . , . Sealy MattreesCo. by Deed recorded in took 136, Page 143, Deed ._ Records of Washington County, Oregon; thence South 43° 47' East . . 440.01 feet to the most southerly corner of said Sealy Mattress Co. . . Tract; thence South 4° 15' East 38 feet to the most easterly corner , . o the Timothy Casey and Jane Casey Tract, as recorded in Book 126, Page 330, Deed Records of Washington County, Oregon; thence South , • . ,. 49° 45' West, 111.74 feet to, the place of beginning. . . .,4 . , . 4 . , .., .. ., , * . '0. .,, . . jl , g ' , . , ■ , , • ,. q. . ,.. ., , ■ , e o ' i ''J,, n , ,' . 4. . . 4 , ... , r' _, , ..„...... ......,.....,......,——...,..,..,,... ...,.............,": ,—..,....,,.......„ —• 'A. . ..•,• . „„. , .. , .6- ,. ■ . k.. —. ___,,,,______........& , _ ____ ____" ................................. (‘'V, i NE 1/4 S EC rIoN 2 T2 . .. , . , ....prom.....t.thm*ti ON .r R 1 VI W.M ,,• ... ..) . , / WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON ,.- SCALt. It : 0 - , 1 0, f‘..,•40,,.-,.. 1, r • • • , .. s ' •■•• p0 •.... , ,,,,7•^4:1141 ,,,‘'';'. ''''`i0i.,`11 '),, A .,).•;,„,1 • / *P . eoo \ 10 ,,,,,,,,<`'4,„/„../4 ''''' ki•'ri '. • ,,ok' i',,: n:;k4i4 . / '' P. •' 'Pv'tt' ‘.1''''' ,.//' I No i ' , /2 Ac l's 41 / /5 1 00 0 , Sr \,,,,,k4 l'• ,,"Yi1A l•-,'.1 4,1 6 Rel ,111:::31 t „........,,,,,..."VI' ■9'''' { I s coo / , ill tC1S440.i206)) ...,„,"'" II o h s / ,. ..1,.. . . t ,..... ""' s 6.,T 4c 60 / \ \ , . . ,,,,C,S•No 11945) ' ft!, ■ . .: 1 I` 1300 i 0 0 94c r y - . 15 '. ,■"''' ' 1400 .13,imc, 'go , • , ,ko Ir , • 1 5 0 0 0 Vg, . , 6° P `12., ,. • : 6 t4 .■''s t. , V d't,f. ' 404 ‘E' - .............../ 2 a ..... 4....... .04 \ " 4 ' ' \ Iha P,tat a 604 you/i. ctid 4. t N ....) . -14)4atoto yoW toil Lt .fro6itttio_t • : , t..) :tgo.11.0.,.e.11 and ()I.keit, t:,,t•tfri e.t..1..,,, \ i 2200 . i 0.1 q ,tii,4 ptztt AA betiA*Vi.A,d to , •b 0 0 1.4 4 4 c .., 6(4 w)t,Por,t!to 4$:.it.c.. ti.00q)(1.1y e)64(0710..4 4 I. .. 1 110 tetaMUY iO/t arty to.46 4 by ii4. irt. Apicmc,,a 4 icatiotee, tittii eon , e )k A.titco irtault Ws tiroticv co.itititittY 4.* : ..,...., </*/ , \ ,ip 0 ■(' \ \ ai 144, zoo ,4t0,1 i.,C \ — e 4 -04, N6' 4 \ . I i ., 2300 .e.76 it" Q1.0 / , r ,4e 01, , 4t), 1. . . . . „. • • '1',,,,, ,;• 1 ' ' . .. _ . .. ..„ ;,... , , ... .. ....._ . .. _ . , ++.........,..41.1 ......, ' ' 1 ,t1 : , ,, q(, 0. '' ? "4ir ' .,„.' ,_. • (j) 4*' : /frK -A97-- it,0 °I) 4.1 ' ,H:• .1)-* . . . ,..,•.., '.. MEMORANDUM OF CONTRACT 4., .. 4.: . ....,... DATED: July 10, 1979 ,,,,i•,. . . 'i•'- . „ . BETWEEN: VRANZISK BUCHHOLZ . ., , 12660 SW Main Street .. ... Tigard, Oregon 97223 (KOeller”) . . •,:,,,•' , . . AND MAIN STREET DEVELOPMENT LTD, . . an Oregon limited partnership •,f."'.. , . .. composed of J. B. Bishop and 1Vil . , Herm J Buchholz as general .. • partners and Anna HE Buchholz , • . Francis V. Hatt, and Karl P. ., Buchholz, Jr. as limited partners ,. Suite 303 10505 SW Barbur Boulevard Y • Portland, Oregon 97219 ("Buyer" ) . , . . On duly 10, 1979 , Seller entered into a contract ,"‘,, . ,, lz3;'''gt'',''''''''',','•,'', :''''''''.'' • , . of sale with Buyer pursuant to which Seller conveyed the pro- t : .. . . • • petty described in attached, Exhibit A to Buyer, The total purchase price for this conveyance was !.....!, ... other consideration and value. SELLER: i•.i, .•.. . • FraTargia—TRIEEriciril ' '.0,r' . ,. • -1-.',,,' ' BUYW1t MAIN OTIET DEVELOPMENT LTD, .,,. H , ' By ..„.„,, ,.),•••-•77,„/-,-.97,r‹,t,,,,-,..,00 ft,' ti , . , i':', • B. B. s oo -, 4 1 ' General Part,,to-: i •.,..",4, . '\,,, : , I Herm J 13U tr • - ,j,' '\).. ' ''''',•,' Oeneral Partner 4). , )•'':. . '..!) .- '4.;.4 • , ,,,•;..-.,;` ,. 1,4 . .):, Uiii,---ff.rE'.4 'd-Ti7Si147-;( .iq.v.-IFgt-i'd-i-lrrrt-:Z-irA t6ti6.1•11i-Ii. 8 ---"ii- to th(i ,Eollowinq address: Suite 3030 10505 SW Barbur Boulevatdf _ :!ii PPt0.00.41. Ot0-01A 07219, tl '•. T.A. .. . . • tic;:i :, • _________________ .;.-.,.. ' ,.• . ... , . .._„......- . ..., r,. ,., .. / ., , ,,,, , ,;. ,,.,„ , „.. ,... , . . oeg.v.v000t,o,,,..*.o•w..r.u.,o,...f...*.w.,,v,...,.,,,„,,.,44;,•.,.........,,,,,........,o,k4s,v:.:............,.,•.•.„.....••...,,„......,..„.„...,,...,...,..,,,,•„..,k,,,,,,........,,,„...,........-----Av'''I '''' . . ,, . , , ,,,, , , , .• 1,,1 - ',... '';' ' '. !,e, '..• , . • ,1 04 thi$ ,...462.._ day o July, 1075, before Me personally P,A : ...- , ' appeared the above named PRANZISKA BUCHHOLZ, nd being duly 1 .. •..-. sworn., ,did acknowledge the foregang Memorandum of Contract , R : to ba her voluntary act and deed. ' k II 1 „. ■ . L4LVAIALL2,Vq........../.......M. (.. . Notary PU lc for Oregop' , . . ,...e. , • My commission expires: d '- i - ,-,' 0 . . .„ 4,*.{ 0 STATE OF 0R1GON )' V. ) 8S . . County of ) ,• . . ,4 ..i On this „IL_ day of July, 1979, before me personally ' tI . ,. appeared the above named a. Bir BISHOP, and being duly sworn, ,•:,,,i. • , did acknowledge the foregoing Memorandum of Contract to be his Voluntary act and deed. .•,. .q.,•, ,, .. at.. .trc .. .,..-,.._,......,, „,1„t‘, ....ces ....y...„_,.. Notary Pu lic fOr oregpw .: ti •,p,„ . , My commission expires: L/6 .•. , . 4,+•,,,41i.., r4 .. STATE OV ORtCON ) 1":1 ., , . _ ) ss , •,:'.,:i, „, • County of ) ., . , lifti on this ",,.) day of July, 1575, before me personally ,•,,,,u, appeared the above tamed HERM j. 8UCH1OLZi and being duly 'L i sworn, did, acknowledge the foregoing Memorandum of Contract ,.: to be his voluntary act and deedA • ( . , 4e_,__„,,..,,.,,.; , . ,,... 11.L . . AN: 0 Notary Pu le *or OregOoi ./ ct ...) ■ My commission expires: 0 ' 4 ° •ti' '.1 • •,,,,'!, ,, ','...,:,.:', r, .. , $14 .i •, , , 2, . ,.'.. ..._,...., , „,..—• '' '--,,,,"1"--., '' .'.',-:,, ,,;.,:::,:..,,;,..:;...;:;;,-:',:,2..',...,,,,:,:::i.c,',:tf,,,,,,,,,,.....--1,-;–,...,--',....,,,,–,''–'-',,;,,,..:,:;,_:–.:-..,: `,,;,.. ...,,;,:,,..',.. i;,. ,:; ;;ii,, ,•,;:,...;, –'':-.. .,;..,"'''''"."' ' '''', '-.'"'". ,. - .' --,t'' •• 'r. • EXHIBIT A , • That tract of land described in Deed Boob ..t 230, Page 117 and Deed Book 230, Page 119, Washington County Deed Records, excepting that tract of land described in Washington r CountyRecorder' s Fee No 78-57107 , and ; • excepting the Southeasterly 69. 3 feet + . of the above tracts of land. k,! -. „,f w{ ,r. t ,. Y . 4 I5 ,yy;) FC u k'Yr 5 ,5 4 1' v P ' ,r t • I , J:� )I' �5 r�'� 4 .. a.niNn:.:Fhi Frr S4P1s,$:M4T^,leM`.d.we'.nx.. ...[..:Ja ..... {4»W�cF.I>..W�Y+LAtlG.carWU,lY'.'. K�iBC 5�5 ..;.. ,,.• . . . . ... . • . . . „ . . . .. . . . , . .. , . „ .. .,.. • '•;,'„; . . 4, .!..:.. , , • '. . • .. • I , .. • !,;., , )s, (A * •'''' ' ' fe.''''.......-'.• ' 7x Z' ir 20C ..'..4 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED • . .............._______ ........_ DATED: July 2 , 197.9 . . H . FRANCIS V. HATT .• 1191 Midway Court . 4 Novato, California 94947 ("Grantor" ) ., . ., IN FAVOR OF: MAIN STREET DEVELOPMENT LTD. an Oregon limited partnership •Ifi „. , Suite 303 • ... 10505 SW Barbur 8oUlevard .. , Portland, Oregon 97219 ("Grantee" ) . , Grantor hereby conveys and warrants to Grantee Grantor' s entire 25 percent undivided interest in the real property described in attached Exhibit A, subject to the ? • d, . 0 ' liens, encumbrances and exceptions set forth in attached v.. EXhibit B4 il • • . . .,„ _• , The true and actual consideration for this con- . I - veyance is other consideration and value. 4,..t,. .......,....... f A I 1,, 1 Li d _ fq71'V.Y.is V. Hatt STATE or )' 1 ' ' - County o ) ,... on this y day of July, 1579, before Me personally -1 appeared the above naited PRANCIS V. HAVE', and being duly A ' ..,., sworn, acknowledged the foregoing Statutory Warranty Peed to be his voluntary at and deed. 1 ...,. . ttø or --. i- - /6 -i,? - 91 My comMisaion exp ,res: 11 : . .. ... . • , .. M, utltiriiWdnqe—rii-IFircr■T6-st7e'd7—a11 t—.i-a---t s'tit.tottton, s 8 Ott • 4•0 seti: '":, • to the following address: Suite 303, 10505 SW rbut Aoulevard, POZtlandi Orotion. ,..! A - .i.,, ,I . _ __ . - , - - - -- .. „, ,. .,..,, .. . . • ' , ...:, • v.,. . .., ,'.:• ,Y,'..' ' .. . '7'”' • '.'.,.i (t --')4:. (0',. .• .., , - ,;,- ,A........./ ‘Iii,) . •. 4 It' )i., -;. - , STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED 1 -; . .............**.....< ''' “•' 1 '• ' „. . . ,• DATED.. July 2, 1979 t•i' A . .4 ■,,,...: , . , . FROM HERM J. BUCiiHOLZ .. ; , 7100 SW Shady Court r , . i . Portland, Oregon 97223 ("Grantor") , . IN FAVOR OF MAIN STR4ET DEVELOPMENT LTD . . an Oregon limited partnership .., . Suite 303 10505 SW Barbur Boulevard e .. . Portlando Oregon 97219 ("Grantee") ,., ,.. ,.. Grantor hereby conveys and warrants to Grantee i.: Grantor, s entire 25 percent undivided interest in the real property described in attached Exhibit A0 subject to the , . . , .. .. liens, encumbrances and exceptions set forth. in attached t'l ,'.. Exhibit 8. , 0 ''':,• P ' ,. The true and actual consideration for this con- , e , voyance is other consideration and value. /) . .,,.!. . . 1 c: • I.,t„ . ,,,:e4r, •.. .......—.............-- 'i4-.4 • . . STATE O1 OREGON ) ) 88 •- ,.;:i., :.;. County of Multnomah ). _ ., . , . On this ,,/'',, , day of aulyt 1979, before me personally . appeared the above named tIAM a, BUCHHOLZ , and being duly sworn) acknowledged the foregoing 8tatutory Warranty Detd to be his voluntary act and deed. /,:76. 44' ' Li 0._,.,__! ),,,... . , ,,,/,,t , G ..:_r.e; Notary' PU110 or orego- ---7. ' e My cotatni88ioh eixpitta t 104 ',., .1,,,j. .,•'' .;,,•fit'4. .... ^ ,• ,,i,i' ,f 1 jlTd,if , 4'1 -- ;-" -- : ' . 7T."tltri ; araIgeis requested all taxSMeRitViliIair-31it-- to the following. address: Suite 0.1.1 105.05 SW ilatbur toulovatdi 14,„ POrtOildi 0.t:A5,5,,P17L!iL -.....--......., 1 , . . , , . .. , , .. , . ., . „• , , , 0 1 ''' ' it, ,i,:„, ,1 rt 6k ,.., r, , . : . „.,; . 1".4: . . . . . , STATUTORY WARANTY DEED a . . . . . . .. DATED! July 2 , 1979 . , . . , . , .. PROM; ANNA Hi BocnnoLz P : . •:,... 51339 SE Stark Street, Apt, 16 4 Portland, Oregon. 97215 ("Grantor” ) m44 J ._. *\ 1 IN rAvoR OF MAIN STREET DEVELOPMENT LTD., 4 ' an Oregon limited partnership , . , . Suite 303 10505 SW Sarbur tioulevard IA . . , . .. Portiandp Oregon 97219 ("Grantee") ‘ .: ,t• ..t, 'i : . Grantor hereby conveys and warrants to Grantee P ' . , .• . . . '.. ,.. Grantor' s entire 25 percent undivided interest in the real ... ..,.. , . property described in attached Exhibit A, subject to the . ,. •:I liens, encuMbrances and exceptions set forth in attached . ..., 0 . . . Exhibit '13. The truo and actual consideration for this COn 4-i V ' veyance is other consideration and value, ' '4/1 . ,•,.': , • . , Anla li. Buchholz , STATE Oli" OREGON ) I ' County of Multnomah ) . .,. t,. Oh this /...iL day of aulyi 1979, before me por8onally ''',, appeared the above named ANNA II. BUCHHOLZ , and being duly III sworn, Acknowledged the foregoing statutory Warranty beed to be her voluntary act and deed /. , i' I ‘, ,i/ - / (...411 ',It t,4, ' -1/4,..:'6e 1 4.. L d„.#4 ,, Hfli il. I , 1 :HP No:EarY'1311FETE—ESE13'i6-66E7' ,, —"--",-„ e•4 'li e ' My dOttinti88i011 dItt5i1,68 t, 6; fi 111 OTitri -ii." 8'87-41T----i:ireitarerttor*""Iffe:rgd-"E sent ..,0 the follOWinq address: Suite 301, 10505 8W ttarbur toulevatdi a4;f4 EatI1Prq4,..2.ttlqIii:«412 .,,, 1",„,..:, '17 ‘ , l 'illA Y . r .,..1.-, '-- ,.. ..,..,,, -.--...4-„,;;;,,,-;;,;,.,4:, ;' .'„.,„;i, ;,,,,,.‘„„.,,,,„.;,„4,„.,.: '....,4;:.::."•::!,..:';:2-..-:::.;',,;::;„:;.:,:;: '.: L.:. :;.. .;,.;4,.;4”;,;;;; ; Ii--'''-''''''. 1V'-'- '''.'''. '----111 . , jt '..11 ,,,r . , 4 ,6..., .,.: .... (q . , , (I, r .,.. STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED DATED: J-uly 2, 1979. . 0 FROM KARL P. BUCHHOLZ, JR . , ) 2120 SW Alberta Street . Tigard, Oregon 97223 ("Grantor" ) It FAVOR OF MAIN STREET DEVELOPMENT LTD t, an Oregon limited partnership Suite 303 ,1 10505 SW Barbur Boulevard k POrtland, Oregon 97219 .. Grantor hereby conveys and warrants to Grantee ri • Grantor' s entire 25 percent undivided interest in the real R, IA' .4 property described in attached Exhibit A, subject to the ,....1 liens, encumbrances and exceptions set forth in attached 41 : 1 Exhibit B. ti The true and a6tual consideration for this con- veyanee is othelA consideration and value. ,c . . ... , 0 (iD , . Karl P. -burlhholz, Jr. ii ' 41 I S'PATE OF 0R8GON ) 0 ,-- ) ss 1, •i , County of ) "1 t On this ,i2,,,, day of auly, 15750 before me personally 1 .. ', appeared the above ITaiiied XAAL P. tUcHlioLZ, ag. , and being duly 11) hl sworn, acknoWledged the foregoing statutory Warranty Deed to t4 be his voluntary act and deed. . AL ki . , } . 700,(„,attilic 8sion etpite8t 6,' ,,,,,A )id '.5, ,?:t Notar Public, tor oregon , , , 4 bntili-Ziri',1-1*(5Z-Ii-Yequested, a 1 tax statementi-T3H6Tiagega- imiTE-- ;1 to the followihg address: Suite 303, 10505 8W 8arbur 8oulevard, i '.. „ Portland, Ore oh 9/215. it 1, , t ,is, '1, . . , — .----,,----------. - •' , • •.. . . . ,., . ., , Y " ( ) r tt f''' ,.. . i, LI r lit irivrtgage twrieribi, if •-il tritivutty tntt,reol In writing, It stien Ito irt:hr 'itty tthys txxttv MIWIl ittiV, .1 tilt tlisiti* the B acquires said estate or intek or shall not he given to the Company within\, ,tave, been determined and no right of . ,• any part thereof, by foreclosure, tritstee's ten days of the receipt of process or plead. ''action shall accrue to the Insured tinder /; . • sale, of other legal manner in satisfaction logs or if the Insured shall not, in writing, this policy until thirty days after such • . . , of said indebtedness, or any part thereof, promptly notify the Company of any de statement shall have been furnished, and , rg;, or if a federal agency or instrumentalitI.; feet, lien or ,encumbrance insured against no recovery shall be had by the Insured acquires said estate or interest, or any palt which shall come to the knowledge of the under this policy unless action shall be il 1 thereof, as a consequence of an losoramto Insured, or if the insured 8ha1l 110t, in commenced thereon within tive years after contract or guaranty insuring or guatan. writing, promptly notify the Company of expiration of said thirty day period. Fail, r teeing the indebtedness secured by a mort. any such rejection by reason of claimed ure to furnish such statement of loss or .4 . ...„„,„,444.104,,,,44444441,4144.4.4,41,4040,544_440,0444,1,0,6‘,..„0,04,40,444414.404,4114.41.,„412.watt. .aux.,,„4.4.4.43404041.,4414,,u.. .. . "fr . , -----A);( / 7---*— .1Y00 }; .. k . • . SCHEDULE A kq , . V .. . Data of 1:36 P.M. Amount $ 80 000 00 Policy No. W 15217 , . . . Policy December 29, 1978 Premium $ 310.00 A .. '.' ., . ....: . 1. Name of Insured , . . . . FRANZISXA "BUCHHOLZ and J. B. BISHOP. . , A ,.. 4 . ,.. 2. The estate or interest in the land described in this Schedule and which is covered by this policy is: f. ..--.. . . A Fee. , . , . , . ., . I 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy ! , vested ins , , , . . . ANNA DELLA HEINTZ, as to an undivided one-half interest and PETER W. HEINTZ and MARY A. HEINZ, as tenants by the entiretyi , . • as to an undivided one-hrilf interest. az.' ir , , 1 0.: 4. The la referred to this policy is described as :id in See folloWing page. . ,., , i Y ti * , I .' I# . I 4 . ■ ,,, ' 1 4 . • • • i,,kY' ft • • '"r1 .:N..,+y 5n.: •.Y, r 4 i. A rm..f"' J1 „" S >w x? ' r r. �. :- , .p .�' w e .t atil r,q:s PJ ,f •Ai7r *400�� • W 15217 K DESCRIPTION • A. tract of land in Section 20 Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette ,Nderidian, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, described as follows: e inning point on the easterly of that certain tract Of ' y at a oih . line� • Beginning • lent...�Conveyed to Karl Buchholz, et ux, by Deed recorded May 2, 1944 6,; in Back 230, Page 117, where the same is intersected by the southe17ly line of Taylor's Ferry Road; thence running Westerly • , along the southerly line of Taylors Ferry Road a distance of 50 feet; thence Southeasterly and parallel With the easterly line of said ,Buchholz tract a distance of 100 feet; thence Northeasterly and parallel with Taylor's Ferry Raod to a point on the easterly T0 line of said Buchholz tract; thence Northwesterly along said easterly line of the Buchholz tract to the place of beginning. • • a' • rr M1 i • • • /f / '''1 CD r rn'+ yr, i, ' / , 0,,,%.,• 6a ,f' ay Jr■ ' • SEE MAP 2 ( 2�dA // r 10y0�1 �+�, r , • o S 9 ib ✓ t� i i+r, ,, ✓ 60 / `. IIr I , 1.'.61? i,1.63's",\1/4\: * t•';'r, w a� 'I '�1� �C* 9 ■ eP �`• t(C d 1 ,,��"' �d 1' p , wow • 1 . ,,r , 0 ,/ 1100 j✓ 4. ✓''� , 1300 + q r• �, �Q ,�DAc Sp ; , 0p ra yyyyyy • • // \ 46P4c ,,1 ' ✓ Wt;.:'1.,,,,,.-',‘,:l,''''' :...*: ' ./ ./.7 '' \ r::v 4°a 0\\\IHCr xM O • )1 . 1600 ',,. 0 1701 °�. t '' 3Ac " , 4 `" rn �4 4.0.' 4. nip d nor ,�� ,+ +I"' 1703 f r )".'J e . is y,4S6- 1 7 0 1 q ty - r �, ,� ►;rd ; \ b ., „y y,Qf \ i as ' Y r . } yi t+r��i 0:400 /yk,. `e+4 .'. ?+i }ASS who �l a d i3 Ae, Q`ty tabj� * °lit . . J' j t46 ►`tip ,4,' .,�, �1 2,10 0 0. trio ', , ii°°e.' ::414!::'!:*:i'''''"”-;',:::14 : ts. , Vkatii, , 1,04)'' ,, ' " a af&tet" ,,,.)`11,,'44'. ,i', t 1. xi, o , r (f ,4 Y�ro M ry, ' L'''' ' FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS AND HYDRAULIC STUDY MAIN STREET DEVELOPMENT , s , TIGARD, OREGON a . . A E A. I A FOR: I , MAIN STREET DEVELOPMENT, LTD. .t 1 BY: i MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC'. .4, 1, I , Y 1 1j I f: 4 i4 A " p, a FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS AND FYDRAULIC STUDY INTRODUCTION The following report represents the findings and conclusions of an investigation as to the impact on the floodplain and the general hydrology around a specific area, as effected by ! ' the proposed Main Street Development. The specific area is , the Fanno Creek drainage area adjacent to the proposed site. 's ` The floodplain is the 100 Year Floodplain as established by the U. S. Army Corp of Engineers for the Fanno Creek drainage area. The improvements to this area, which, are necessary for the Main Street Development generally consist of the following: 1. Filling within a portion of the floodplain for: r . , a. building site 2. Utilization of portions of the existing floodplain for open space and landscaping (W thout filling) . 1 o• { ( • PROBLEM STATEMENT There are two ways that proposed construction can create `• • • • a hydrauliCimpact on the flood capacity of Fanno Creek. The' embankment may decrease its capacity to store flood water and the embankment may cause a constriction which would `esult in additional flooding over that under existing conditions. These potential problems are addressed in this report under the headings of "Flood Storage" and "Channel Restrictions" . ' • • ' ; • • 4n Y f I S V ' 4' • 4f . •r., ,., it :P ;+ws arc{nsn Mu;O fiG�?}'rtK«w..awti:w..-..• _'.r ( • ,v SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS The result of the enclosed study lead to the following conclusions: a. The areas within the floodplain on the site which are proposed to be filled, are backwater areas of the floodplain itself. These are areas where during the period of a 100 year storm, the storm waters may • back up and store in, but where no appreciable moving water is located. b. The floodplain filling and proposed modifications to the drainage channel for Fanno Creek basin will have no negative effect on the waterflow or the floodplain downstream or upstream from the site. c. The amounts of fill proposed for the project within the floodplain and the placement of this fill would result in a negligible reduction of the flood storage capacity as it exists on the site; however, adequate room is available within th e floodolain to excavate suf.. ficient volume to provide no impact in the Storage if desired. d. At the request of the Public Works Director we have con- sidered what would happen if the Main Street Bridge were to be improved. If this were to happen, the flood plain elevation would rise possibly as high as 1501 instead of 148 ' at the Site. The fill would remain less than 1% of the floodplain storage volume and the stream flow would. Still have no negative effect. IY: ,..Sl.a___.,. ....•.........,.+.,..:.,..vw-_..._«-.,...::. , ,., a..... _.,+_.,:.--,..x ...It_:n. z._:�'.:i.x.._..r,_....•...a�.M-k..-_.lt ..,_....._.....-L...-................5.«.,».___..,.. : -....__ -.- -...._... r»....,...._ 5•. • • 444 .. FLOOD STORAGE In order to determine the effect of the proposed construction on the storage capacity of the flood- plain we calculate the volume of net fill, or excava-- tion, within the 100 year floodplain. Net fill would result in a decrease in floodplain storage volume, while a net excavation will provide an adds_ itional storage volume. The proposed work, as • indicated, requires 128 cubic yards of fill compared to the total floodplain storage volume of nearly 12,400 cubic yards. This is approximately 1%. This small fill would have negligible impact on the storage capacity of the floodplain without excavating in the floodplain to maintain the existing capacity. However, if the Public Works Department or the Planning Commission desires adequate room is available to excavate 128 cubic yards without further `impact to the floodplain. • 1,yy r • 1 r�i Y �fl W j ....� • n wY..•x Frtr:•+..a,n fY:tr 5w Hr ..n ..9lmd aka.w.nY:..,v.y_«. .,,....,.:«•.....mow-....-.a-r...,.Y«r r,:ww...r.u._w, . :. e. : ♦ .s:. .��� e ) CHANNEL, RESTRICTION The flood profile through the site can be computed y. using the "Standard Step Backwater Computations" . s ,. 1 Comparison of the results from th !s procedure will be applied to both the existing and proposed condition in order to demonstrate the effect of the proposed construction of the floodplain elevation. Inn the data available from the Army Corps of Engineers, it is t'' apparent that the flow is subcritical and the floodplain elevation is controlled downstream by Hall Boulevard, which is approximately 6,000 feet downstream from the • site. Under these conditions, relative differences between existing and proposed conditions can be determined by computing the floodplain elevation from a control point downstream. The elevation of the flood was computed in three sections. In these calculations, the following assumptions were used to obtain the resuXts tabulated on the next page. • { 1 if J , iff �6 L • f.5 .. ., .:. .,. ,:; RRIIIMI t// S1! , -.. RaR�RMAInr/ .•... :..:... � ,. • - • DATA SHEET AND RESULTS • BACKWATER CURVE 100 Year Flow Rate - 4 ,038 CFS, based on CH2M Hill 100 year flow at Fanno Creek, Mannings 'n' = . 030 Velocity Coeff = 1.3 Control PT Elevation - Downstream control assumed at 148.° Feet. 300 Feet Downstream from the site 100 Year Flood Profile Elevations Before & After Construction Elevation Elevation Elevation • Section . Before Const. After Const. Change 0 148. 0 Ft. 148.0 Ft. 0 1 Site' 148 .10 Ft. . 148 .11 Ft. .01 2 148.12 Ft. 148.12 Ft. 0 These results Clearly show that there us no significant effect on the floodplain profile die to the proposed construction; in fact, the only effect is a slight raising of the floodplain elevation at Section two of 0.01 'feet. A differehce of 0.01 feet in thLs type of analysis iO not significant because the available iMpUtdata is not that acdqrately 4 . . -\. ,..'X'''' e, • . . . . . I . . . . . . ( SPECIAL USE PERMIT '' ,‘ . , APPLICATION . FILE # . naE plefr.D........................_............................._.............._ . Tigard Planning Commission 639-4171 RECEIPT # , 12420 S.W. Main St. , Tigard, Oregon 97223 DATE REcT7 BY . .. . — ....,. :, , PLEASE PRINT IN INK OR TYPE • • Action Requested Land Fill Near Fanno Creek • Ltd. • Applicant's Name Buchholz/Bishop.„Main Street Develor)e-Phone 246-5469 Applicant's Address 10505 SW Barbur Blvd. 0303 Portland Ore•on 97219 ., .: treet qty tate —7257.— J B Bishop & Herm Buchholz, General Partners, and Limited Partners Owner's Name of Ann Buchholz , Fran Hatt (Buchholz) & Karl Buchholz Owner's Address 10505 SW Barbur Blvd. #303 Portland Oregon 97219 ffitreet --(Lify)------(Sfitie) --12ip) Applicant is Owner X Contract Purchased X Developer Agent Other Owner Recognitidn of Application: J......... 1 Person responsible for ap' lication 10505 SW Barbur Blvd. 4303 treet gr179---ture 7717150 B Bisho7H5T-)erm Buchholz, Portland ity Oreson tate 97219 ip . ...,,tegistered Engineer's Name Thomas R., Mackenzie :Thane 224-9560 _______ '..trItegistered :Engineer's,:offite .nackenzie ..Engineering, ,Inc. ifijnone 224-9560 ,,,age.gistered:Engineer Is Address Z690 SW Bancroft „ jio:4120r t 1 arid , ..1*.Oregon . , .. V7201 - - 1 * 'G' ',; ' . : . . ,' ,..;, ,' , ,„ 7611".'"...""TZelet ., . ,f4.. ..,. ty) . ., ,,,, tate , .. ..* . ip • . - . Ili , ii , $ *ROPE11Y INVOLVED:. ' . Valt lqap 0 2512AC ' 'Tax Lot ts) 1400/ 1300, .1200 11 ,:•.,,..,... Portion of 200 Parcel ' ss...p_giniar„ ,Mairi_...laari'' ascii, Drecf2n .Area 11.51 1 '.04titisting'tkItaings Itcaina*e) 1 iiM....i______idoo '4 4r.eenilOtitie i'i.___Ishi.. . '''... b.;Atetail.;fP.3.a.nt':'$alet itt-4.130a.t.ACC2SSOry fRetztiLfSetles,331dg,. .: • , ,..,:..4. . ,,,,,„,.:,!. ,•., '-.,-,- .1,:i. ,,•;.5.0,.;43.trrentiLs...: , . :43urrentXifete : L_L____::..L_ J `.■,$it ' . 4 . . , *PliCantE 'Proosed kiting CI44,i PD :iikpplicants'Proposed Use Commercial & . ., page two • Revised 7/23/79 i ( SPECIAL USE PERMIT ,1 Type of fill: Clean, Compacted Earthen Material Cubic yards of fill: 128 .: Area of site flood plain to be occupied by fill: 6350 - sq. f Y (Sq. ft. (Fill)/Sq.Ft. (Site) x 100 = ,8 % of site to be in Flood Plain Flood Plain filled. Distance of fill from stream's edge: Horizontal Distance 25 Ft. Vertical Drop: _ io -Ft. (see drawings SD4 and SDS) Tyne of bank to be installed: Compacted clean earth and rack suprted by . ,probable ri.-ra• .__ M ' Net change in storage capacity of flood plain resulting from fill 0 to -3456 Cu.Ft g Y g (decrease in storage cap.) ,. Will the fill increase the flood crest or modify the flow of floodwaters? Yes Nom X If so, what will the quantitative Y effects be? (Attach a sheet for explanation.) Structures Existing structure(s)in flood plain: None . Height Ft. Width Ft Distance from stream's edge: Horizontal Distance F Vertical, Drop _ _ F1 s:„; Proposed structure (s) in flood plain oNE . .g '._. ` i.. Pi lea, ht _ 2 5 :Pt. Width, 200 ,• '. w,.; : Distance from stream's edge orizontal Distance 25 ' 4 . erti 1 p ' � ` . � ... � - ` tin. . Y �, .s� L��n 'existing ,mod proposed str�ct�rer nearest �.nt) �' no ex,a.s - F�I . . ;�. o retrain ` ormalty 'the f10 4 of flood waters? Yes .Flo. ' -1f so what w structure l itati effects ? Attach a ,s sheet la ation a � ' ► be "ail hee for ,�qa ) r ff ,a !i•y , i e � structure d xtx',�c ��� , . . ,� , 5 � + :thste�rid �t3�n.*Hods, � d.4. .. .rye +tea .� .'� ft ' r,. otter', + +. t .� ■ ' .. y .,l a� + "�wwwr�•Y, �..\ `�+:�1. .�y 17*1i \ ..+�1+ +. °.. .0 i ,. ` . .Y. °I y,. 4\ i,. ' . ,+ '• ......,:y. r. a•i.'r\. .l.:ay .i';.,�• , '{. y , w • '. ... t.i2. ing:mill be`•raised' ove '. lt`od aatete. (•,' z. •., . °`•, , ■ . . ,. . .. .. . „ • • .... .,• , . •••• .-.. .. . ..—... 'a . • , .. ; . . .. . . . . . . . , . —. . • 1, .. ___,.... . ., _..,,...,..„. . . '1"-.•,,,, . . , 1 Page three k 1 ,.. . . ..„,„.. k.,...2' • • . •. . SPECIAL USE PERMIT • . r , . • . ' 1 i, . ' . ... . .......-71Sttql2._ What 1 - 'ty , .pe of materials are to be stored? None I• . . . . , ,.. . ......_ Volume/quantity of material (8) NIA I, . . .1. . . Distance of storage from stream 's edge: Horizontal F •1 Vertical Drop .... . Dittance of storage from nearest building . r '- ••• . , • Will the material he anchored to prevent movement in the event of a flood? .. . . ... . . . . Yes How? NO Why Not?' )' . . . . . . . fEAWE5—i—iheet for eXplanation, 1 • -.3 • ' t , ,,, 3 . , ! ,. • . . I Type of screehing for storage ,.........„.....,..,.....--,....,-....• •• -, ,• ..,........,.....—..., .. . . I .' . .. ..i 1 4 i. . , . . . • , , ' • ' I 1 . 1 . . . .. ' , . , . . • ., •• , • . . 4. . . • i. . 4■ . • . -..• .. ,,,. •a , . ■ 1,,4„,, ak 4 i:' • '' , , • *a io,"." tr • 4 4 . "4 .,■1.,i . • .'.. 1 i'.', . ' 4.4 4 • '. . ' ' ' . . . . • • • 44. ' '• . * 4", . • .. 4 4 ') ." . ... , . • . , 4 .r,..4.4.•,t.i,° '+'. ... '4.:' I' - ,4,..*4 *•...,...4, .',""' • 0 „,0 ,,. ',.. ‘,. • • .... ."I 4/4 )• • 4 „4, ! • . 14• , .,1"• 4, ■44,-, ,, „ 4 ,. 4' . . 4 i 4 ' / • '.S . . 4 .. . '4 . " • • , . , . „ 4 , • ' ' • •';;;''', # ' 4 • . 4.,4 .. • 1, , • .0,''',;• ... 4 ' ..,',,' 44 4 '04 “. *"...4. , . a . ' ' 414: ' i' ' .4J .'4 ..I'i I.i' 'fr A'r'. ' - .. . .I. '. ' I1r ,,,,,,. #4. • ; .L"'".• 4' . ..,',4• .' , 54, , ,.#r t•# 4.' I '' .,.•..1 ,,t,4,,,4.4 4,,,,,a,,.1;.....i'...0-•i'ilkt,,,,,,I.0,!.t,h,ij•i•.,..;, ,,,,,,,,sit,e,ok,.:- !,.'1.'1 ,;.,11.4.. ,..o.',', • ,4••„,„ -0, . ,.4,..,'',e . 4..dtt,,,,,,0 Fay,,,•'",,,e, 4..1 , e."/ ‘4,••4., , ,Om I,1,,*, 4,..r_,„,. ,,...4,,, li . ." . * "": ,,,—. ' . . %' '0'11FP". .,". ,'i.0.',.T7 i'",444,'.!."..... ', ' ,' .. !.l'. ',C”."' L...•1..." . . . 4., 4, -4 4 ••' • . 4 . 4. 4,x 1,04 . , • „ . /I 4 4 , 4 ' ;#.,-.4.44 0 1,4„,141,4,a444410.4.4,4. ,a4.ei,.,;. t....,„,..;.,,.,,4-). „„..,,",.,.., , ., ,„ , . -..."0 44.: 1.- 4 .. .;4...1.,. .4 [, . . . . # • • • 1 °"a •l'.w v • r I. , 7• / t i 1 , / 1 � ; I 4 1 ? • 9 1 t 51! • ' 7 1 i. 7 4. _ h' ,. 4 ' 4, ,fir ♦ I, ■ 1 • \ . 7' e; n • . .,, 5 � i rt,11 l�.. \..i L./ ", . , ',,',\ ,,... a'. \ . • . ;, I 1 \ , 1 i V. 1 1t p444 �,i" !,r i ,F \\''' ,• t ` 4 s ..\ i . • l m . Iml‘'