Loading...
ZC5-76 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. .. --. 400 FLETCHER, HANSEN, PARSONS , Zone Change (ZC 5-76) �. _....�. Southeast corner 72nd & Varns 0. • �tiF 2 ry: • • ' w t ' , 111 t ' . 1 • , . . PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FILE CONTENTS SEE ALSOSq41- ____ LEFT SIDE RIGHT SIDE ,,..■•■••...*.......*.....*****........■......................0*. Assessor' s Map _Maps/Preliminary Plat fr ,. Notification Legal Description/Deed . . . _J/ Surrounding Property Notice Letter of Authorization • /Affidavit of Mailing Copies of Correspondence with Applicant .• ......_ Av.ncy/NPO Notice Public Input ____ ff-,I-76 Affidavit of Publication __Agrcy/NPO Comments .45'76 i/ Articles/Notices from TV /Staff Report(s)—Date(s) / _Application/Narrative 6iiitutes of Meetings a-/b---7e. 41Final Action Notice . ../Planning Commission—Date %..- • Council—Date igiV-0,25416 , __Resolution No, t Date /Ordinance No /4&-7 Date .14 ,13--Id . . _I/ Cot-respondence After Approval , SUMMARY 41-41O A4-4 )10111)1&I 'bed' Approved Denied ,z. ................ ,. No, of Lots Phases No, of 11— ,:. . Special Setbacks /14 , . ;Z/Ilhilthiebtielt/4 ewto-t"- 'wall dleatal) . , 4/1)/4/1/0),tiuul,,, 7 / me, 4rtaikatii , -6e go Plat Recording il/ . . , ratv "wait Om Ao eutzilde 0, Name Book/Page No, & Date ., Additional Phases Recorded (Date) (Book/Page No.) (Date) (Book/Page No.) 14./bjs(06160) ra r ( S-R I3ECEIVED JUL -1 197, SMITE{ - R I T C HIFPTYOFT!O,RU CORPORATION J'DUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL & INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE SUCCESSOR TO BREWSTER & BAIL`( AMERICAN BANS BUILDING OFFICES IN 621 S.W.MORRISON PORTLAND PORTLAND,OR 97205 June 29 1977 SAN FRANCISCO (503)227-2654 OAKLAND SAN JOSE SAN DIEGO Mr. Richard Bolens Director of Planning City of Tigard 12420 S. W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Subject: 72nd Business Center (Varns Park Office/Industrial Subdivision) Dear Dick: I am glad that you and I, Nancy Edwards, Rennie Smith and Lynn Takeuchi had an opportunity to get together yesterday and discuss the design and develop- . ment program which you would like to see occur in the 72nd Business Center. It is my understanding that you would like to see office buildings developed on the four lots (1, 2, 12 and 13) fronting on S. W. 72nd Avenue and the major access drive to the subdivision. I understand that you woulll like to see these buildings constructed of wood and have the majority of their roof surface sloped and constructed of wood shingles, wood shakes, earthtone architectural metal, CorTen metal, or earthtone ceramic tile, We also discussed that you would like to see similar office structures con- structed on Lots 14 and 15. t " We discussed, and :C believe agreed, that the balance of the lots (3 through il) could be developed for industrial uses in concert with those industrial uses • described in .'City of Tigard Ordinance No, 76-37. We both agreed that offices and industrial buildings should be scattered among these time lots so as not to concentrate the industrial buildings, After reviewing pictures of some industrial development in the Irvine Indus- trial park in Irvine, California, we agreed that industrial buildings could be constructed With flat roofs and with concrete walls, provided the concrete was finished with form liner, sandblasted, aggregate or similar decorative finish. Any paint used on exterior surfaces of industrial buildings would be fit.y i Mr. Richard ,glens June 29, 1977 Page 2 of an earth tone to conform with the heavy natural landscaping of the site. We also discussed that Lots 9, 10 and 11 could have dual accesses to Varns Road and the internal loop road, and that there could be no through traffic. These lots might be ideal for industrial development as they could provide service access off S. W. Varns Road and pedestrian and passenger vehicle • access off the interior loop road, with the offices facing the loop road. In line with these discussions and agreements we are proposing to Toledo Scale Company that they accept one of the other lots, probably Lot 10 or 11, for • the construction of their office and service center. The building which we will propose for construction will be almost identical to that which is pictured in the enclosed photograph. • We also discussed that Lot 7 will probably be developed as an office building and that Lot 3 will probably involve the construction of a 10,0000 printing plant. I have discussed our conversation with Mr. Robert Fletcher, one of the three developers of the property, and he is in concurrence with the above ideas. By the way, both Mr. Fletcher and I fully support the proposed development 1 of an office building immediately to the south of the 72nd Business Center at the corner of Sandberg Road and S. W. 72nd. We look forward to working with you on this project and to expeditious de•relop- • meat of the property in concert with r'he goals which both the City of Tigard and the developers wish to achieve. Yours very truly, S. Milton Smith SH8 is September 17, 1976 • Mr. Robert M. Fletcher 1750 S.W. Skyline Blvd, Suite 120 'Portland, Oregon 97221 • Re: ZC 5-76 Dear Hr. Fletcher: • The Tigard City Council at their regular meeting September 13, 1076, adopted ordinance 76.37 for an amendment to a Planned Development for property located at the southeast corner of S.W. 72nd Axenue and S.W. Yarns Road. I am enclosing for your records a certified copy of the ordinance and -I I may be of further assistance to you regarding this matter, please contact me. Sincerely* Btuet P. Clark • City Administrator BPC/fs ttict Ordinance • s4 ). APPROVE OLCC APPLICATION - Davidson's Restaurant Steak House, 11290 S.W. Bull Mountain Road, Tigard - Beer and Wine Application (a) Chief of Police recommended Council approval, (b) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Wakem to approve application and forward to OLCC. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 10. APPROVE L.G.P.I. SUBSCRIPTION MEMBERSHIP DUES - 030. (a) City Administrator recommended Council authorize staff to pay membership fee. (b) Motion to approve payment of fee; Councilman Wakem, seconded by Councilman Moore. $' ii Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 11. ORDINANCE No. 76-37 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE No. 74-28, ADOPTING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO A REVISED GENERAL PLAN AND PROGRAM, AND ADOPTING THE ATTACHED EXHIBITS "A" AND "B" AS THE AMENDED GENERAL PLAN AND PROGRAM, AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Request by Fletcher, Hansen and Parsons for a general plan and program review of a proposed commercial-office park Planned Development located at the southeast corner of S.W. 72nd Avenue and S.W. Varns Road (Wash, Co, Tax Map 2S1 1D, Tax Lot 900). (a) Planning Director recommended Council approval. (b) Motion to adopt; Councilman Moore, seconded by Councilman Mickelson. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 12. ORDINANCE No, 76-38 All ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 10.280 OF Tat TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE By ADDING TO SECTION 10.28.130 T4 • PROHIBIT PARKING ON A PORTION OF SAW. LOMITA STREET EASTERLY OF S.W. 90TH AVENUE, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (a) City Administrator recommended Council approval. (b) Motion to adopt; Councilman Mickelson) seconded by Councilman Moore. • (c) Discussion, by Council and staff followed with regards to emergency clause. • Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 13, ORDINANCE No. 76-39 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 7.40.070 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CQDE, RELATING TO NOISE 8Y LIMITING THE MOMS DURING WHICH CONMICTION MAY BE UNDERTAKEN. • (a) City Administrator recommended Council approValA (b) Discussion by Council, and staff followed regarding the intett of the ordinance and the stipulated time. PAGE 2 . COUNCIL MINUTES . SEPTEN8ER 13, 1976 0 if p4. 41,L CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 76- 37 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 74-28, PURSUANT TO THE APPLICATION FOR SAID AMENDMENT BY FLETCHER, HANSEN .AND PARSONS, ADOPTING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO A REVISED GENERAL PLAN AND PROGRAM, AND ADOPTING THE ATTACHED EXHIBITS"A" AND "B" AS THE AMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND GENERAL PLAN AND PROGRAM, AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS : Section 1 : The Council f: nds that the lands hereinafter described on attached Exhibit "C" have heretofore been and are now classified M-4 (Industrial Park Zone) with an overlying PD (Planned Development Zone) as approved by the City Council on June 10th, 1974 , Section 2: The Council further finds that pursuant to prescribed procedures, application for amendment of the adopted Planned Development Zone was the subject of a public hearing held by the Planning Commission on August 3, 1976 and the Commission has heretofore filed its report with the City Recorder, recommending approval of the application . Section 3: The Council further finds that after due and legal notice a public hearing was held on August 23, 1976, before an impartial council , and that at said hearing the applicant and all interested parties were afforded an opportunity to be heard and to present and rebut evidence with respect to said application , Section 4 : Based on the evidence both oral and documentary and the record of said hearing before the City Council , the Council finds that the proposed amendments conform to the findings of Ordinance 74-28, section 4, which form the 'basis for Council ' s granting of the original application. Section 5: That the applicant 's request for a Planned Developmc,nt Zone amendment , as embodied in or ' xhibited by the Planned Development documents submitted by the applicants and hereto attached and identified as follows is hereby approved: Exhibit "A" - Site Development Plans Exhibit "B" - General Development Plan and Program and each of the foregoing is hereby made a part hereof, and the duvcaupment and use of said land shall proceed consistent therewith and subject to each and all requimments of Chapter 18 . 56, Tigard Municipal Code and subject to the further requirements and, conditions : I , The signing program for the entire park be subject to Design Review Board approval . 2 That twenty feet along SW 72nd Avenue be dedicated for the future widening of SW 72nd Avenue to arterial standards, Ordinance No 76- 3:7 . • , , 3 . An agreement to participate in a local improvement district for the improvement of SW 72nd to City standards to an arterial street and the same type of agreement be attached to lots 9, 10 and 11 to bring Varns Street up to City local . street standards . • ( 4. \ A covenant to the deeds for lots 1-8, 12 and 13 be executed prohibiting access to SW 72nd and SW Varns Streets . Lots 9, 10 and 11 which will have access to SW Varns shall be restricted from having through access to the internal street . 5 . The setback from SW 72nd Avenue be 40 ' with a 10 ' intrusion allowable for no more than 1/3 of the lot width, if no other feasible option is available . • 6. A 10 wide emergency vehicle access be provided along either lot 10 or 11 on a pedestrian path or to be constructed with 6 inches of base rock overladen with sod and signed at both SW Varns Street and the unnamed interior road. 7. The internal street with a 20 ' pavement width be constructed • to city standards for commercial streets and signed for no parking. 8 . The bus turnout lane be dedicated and improved as part of the SW 72nd Avenue local improvement district . 9 Wheelchair ramps be constructed to city standards at the northwest corner of lot 12, 'southwest and southeast corner of lot 13, the northwest and northeast corner of lot 1 and the street median. 10 . A five foot utility easement be provided along all lot lines as deeded, 11 . Access to lots 2, 5, and 12 be combined with adjacent lots and access to lot 9 be combined with lot 8. Access to lots 14 and 15 be provided on the north and south respectively , . and access to lots 1 and 13 be from the internal road, not the entrance way . • . • 12, The storm drainage and retention system be approved by the City engineering Department, Washington County Department of Public Works and the State Highway Department , 13, A street opening permit onto SW 72nd be acquired from Washington County Department of Public Works. 14 , A street lighting plan to city standards be approved by P.G .E. 15 , 411 outright permitted uses allowed in the Commercial Pro- fessional (C-P) zone be permitted and as a conditional use (according to chapter J8 . 72) small-scale, limited research and development typos of non-polluting industry of the following types: Ordinance No. 7G-51 4 t • A. Research and Development Laboratories including experimental , testing and processing facilities. B . Manufacturing and Assembly of Electronic Instruments and Equipmeut and Electrical Devices. C. Manufacturing and Assembly of Precision Instruments, Tools or Devices. • • D. Trade, Skills or Industrial Schools. - r E. Publishing, Printing and Bookbinding Facilities. F. Manufacturing of Medicines and Pharmaceuticals. 16 . All remaining aspects of the development be constructed to applicable health, subdivision and zoning codes. Section 6 : This ordinance shall become effective on the '31st day after its passage by the Council and approval by the Mayor. PASSED: By unanimous vote of all Council members present, after •. being read three time by number and title only this /3 day of pk-2,2ber, 1976 . • _ze-eet//1 W/D-cer,0 Recorder - City of Tigard H. • APPROVED : By the Mayor this Y,!..:37 " day ofa e Lep- , 1976. ayor - City of Tliar • Ordinance No. 76- 37 • IMMEMOMMO , . • 17. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 8:00 P.M. (a) ZONE CHANGE REQUEST: Request by Fletch,,..,r, Hancien and Parsons for a general plan and program review of a proposed commemial-office park Planted Development located at the southeast corner of S.W. 72nd Ave. and S.W. Varns Road (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 1D, Tax Lot 900)b (1) Public Hearing Opened. (2) Planning Director summarized history of dev4opment proposed and stated facts and findings. Planning Director stated the Planning Cummission bad approved the preliminary plan and program on July 15,1976. Planning Director further reviewed conditions subje,A to Planning Ctiqmission1s approval. (3) Public Testimony: Proponents: Mr. Robert Fletcher, applicant, prcsentA the proposed commercial/office park planned devdopment. Mr. Fletcher stated a market survey Alowed a definite need for small industry to have a pre.stigt, location such as was being proposed. Mr. Joachim Grube, 2040 S.W. Jefff,Jrson St. , Portland, presented the proposed landscaping and parking plat. Opponents: None Cross Examiniation: None (4) Public Hearing Closed. (5) Discussion followed by Council, staff and applicant. (6) Planning Director recommended Councii1s approval .9abject to the following Conditions: 1, The signing program for th ntire pack be subject to Design Review Board approval. 4 . 2. That twenty feet along SW 72nd &v t,. t6 dAicated for the future widening of SW 72nd Ave to arterial $tandards. 3. At agreement to participat•2 in a local imprawlent district for the improvement of SW 72nd to City standards to an arterial street and the saw7, type of agre(t.crknt t attached to lots 9, 10 and 11 to bring Varns Strf-Ht up to City local street standards. 4. A convenant to the deeds for lots 1-8, 12 and 13 te ev,,cutA • prohibiting access to SW 72nd and SW Varns Streets. tots 9, 10 and 11 which will have access to S.W. Varna shall be restricted from having through access to the internal street. 5. The setback from SW 72nd Ave he 40 with a 101 intrusion allowable for no more than 1/3 of the lot width,' If no other feasible option is available. 6. A 101 wide emergency vehicle access ta: provtded along either lot 10 or 11 on a pedestrian path or to Le constructed with 6 inches of base rock overladon with sod and signed at both 8141 Varns street and the unarmed interior road. PAGE 4 - Regular Meeting Minutes - August 23, 1976 7 7. The internal street with a 20' pavemi.;,nt width ?r q.?. constructed to City standards for comw-,rcial stre. s and signed for no packing. ; 8. The bus turnout land be dedicat6d and improved as part of the SW 72nd Ave local improvement district. 9. Wheelchair ramps be constructo.d to'city standards at the northwest corner of lot 12, southwest and st...) theast corx/er of lot 13) the northwest and northeatit corner of lot 1 and the street median. 10. A five foot utility eas,(..metnt be provithA along all lot: lines as deeded. 11. Access to lots 2, 5, and 12 be combined with adjacent lots and access to lot 9 be combined with lot 8. Acc,,E, to lots 14 and 15 be provided on the north and soul-J reqoect1v(7.13, and access to lots 1 and 13 bt.! from the internal road, not the entrance way, 12- The storm drainage and retention ..flystem he atproved by the • City Engineering Dept , Washington Count' Departt of Public Works and the State Highway Dept. 13. A street opening permit onto SW 7k,Ld be acquired from Washington County Department of Public Works. 14. A street lighting plan to city ,..t.Andards le approvt.id by P.G.E. 15. All outright permitted us6 a!dowt.d in the comra-xcial- , professional zone be permitted and ,,Tall-sc418, limited research and development type of non-pollting in&,t.Iy in accordance with the .conditional use.chapter of Ow Tigard KJticipal Code. 16. All remaining aspects of the th-e,-,Lpment te constructed to applicable health, subdiv:sion and zoning Planning Director itht.r r,corm7„nded in order to more clearly define the ,t-A.A.,11,g uf (Jnditioa #15 th staff pro- . posed the following wordingo All outright permittd & s allowid in the Commercial Professional (C-P) zon it. p(rmitted and as a conditional use (according to Oxapt.,t 18,72) :iTall-s4:al ) limited re- search and development tyi. ki f non-pollcting industry of the following type,, Research and Development Lat,oratorit,,s including experimental , testing and processing f4cilities. Manufacturing and Assemlly of Electronic Instruments and equipment and ElLctrical svics Trade) Skills or Industrial Schools. Publishing) Printing sn :Winding ciltis Manufacturing of WIdiciAes and Pharm4cals. 1 (7) Motion by Councilman Cook, secondA ei CcL .1.Lilman Kekason to direct staff to prepare Ordinance for on chaage re:v.4,0,4 sublict to the 16 conditions recommended by staff InctAing the 1%commended change • in wording of condition 15. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. PAGt 5 - Regular Meeting Minutes - August 23, 1976 CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the City Council at Fowler Junior High Lecture Room, 10865 S.W. Walnut, Tigard, Oregon, on August 23, 1976, at 8:00 P.M. with respect to the following: ZONE CHANGE: Request by Fletcher, Hansen & Parsons for a general plan and program review of a proposed commercial-office park Planned Development located at the S.E. corner of S.W. 72nd Avenue and S.W. Vamps Road (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 ID, Tax Lot 900). RENAME EXISTING DEDICATED ROADWAYS - Request by City of Tigard. a. S.W. 77th Avenue (old name) to S.W. Cherry Drive, portion lying S. of S.W. Varns Street running S. to S.W. Fir Street. b. S.W. Cherry Street (old name) to S.W. Cherry Drive, portion lying S. of S.W. Fir Street, running S. and E. to S.W. 72nd Avenue. c. S.W. Watkins Avenue (old name) to S.W. Brookside Avenue, portion lying N.E. of S.W. Walnut Street and running N.E. 471 feet. d. S.W. Watkins Court (old name) to S.W. Brookside Court, portion lying N.W. of S.W. Watkins Avenue and running N..W. 206 feet. e. S.W. Post Road (old name) to S.W. Greens Way, portion lying S. of • S.W. Summerfield Drive and running S. & W. 694 feet. f. S.W. Post Road (old name) to S.W. Greens Way portior lying S. of S.W. Summerfield Drive and running S. & E. 299 feet. DESIGN REVIEW - Review by the Cite of a Design Review Board 1, decision on July 27, 1976, appeov .l,. a request by Atlas Land Company to construct a 16,000 square foot industrial building at 9380 S.W. Tigard Street. All interested persons may appear and, be heard in favor of or against the said proposal. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Doris Hartig City Recorder TT publish 8/12,19/76 • • e.. „., /6' Arn MEMORANDUM To: City Council From: Planning Staff Subject : ZC 5-76 - Fletcher, Hansen and Parsons Date: August 19, 1976 The attached zone change request is sent to you by the Planning Commitision with their recommendation for approval subject to 16 conditions. The purpose of this memo is to discuss a proposed change in condition #15 in order to make it more definitive. The applicant has requested this clarification because he rinds the present wording too vague for purpose of marketing the property to prospective tenants, Condition #15 as adopted by the Planning Commission ? reads as follows: All outright permitted uses allowed in the commercial- professional zone be permitted and small-scale, limited research and development type of non-polluting industry in accordance with the conditional use chapter of the Tigard Municipal Code, In order to more clearily define the meaning of condi- tion #15 the staff proposes the following wording: All outright permitted uses allowed in the Commercial Professional (C-P) zone be per- mitted and as a conditional use ( according to chapter 38. 72) small-scale, limited re- search and development types of non-pollut- ing industry of the following types: Research and Development Laboratories including m.o.* eiperimeRal , testing and processing facilities. Manufacturing_ and Assembly of Electronic Instru- ment'S 'ind—EqUiTinWCWCtlectrical Devices, Manufacturing and kssemblyqf Precision Instru- , tS• Tools 6r.715e v • Trade, Skills or Industrial Schools. Publishing Printing Rnd riookbinding Facilities, Manufacturing of Medicines and Pharmaceuticals. a d 'f'^. e '7 ..KVtWi:u- / P • , • 'AFFIDAVIT OE t'UBLICAT ,r ' E W- --. '.Q .;r,: �. . . . , orrellit l ,, • STATE 0 ' OREGON, i :��, � 'i '�qq����+yy�}}+ {{{ Y' > n' ..:.. 6a✓ �_� "Far —. 1f ; �.7'II,AlL�,'i" ,,/1'1[w!.}�1 ''-' « COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, Notice�is �r �Sf :�✓ �, b i'rrt a 1ng Will be held y:t., C ty,, unei1 O F TI nA w t,cowier Jun`ior°, ''gh u oor ►.''. i I, ,....... Alas e h. S eh ............... *lignst.20;. o, 'h.*'' i f'r@- e , 'o tihf�e fo1!b ingj:r ''R . u i b duly depose say publisher ......_�.....___..._�. isle C being first dul sworn de ose and sa that I am the ublisher . t b . f401, 1�. 4' :� of The Tigard Times a newspaper of general circulation, as defined '= n � tl�� ,' ' ra... .r,V'0 c� . '•' ,, rurra 1,,, CrOitn cia'taoff)le ark',„ 1 by ORS 193.010 and 193.020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and Ptann ,L,,:,`Ot OrA'i' ted i '0 , , ;fits .; kli• e . S.W, ar.n Ri ,"'.('U'asii,' O 'Tax' ' state; that the legal notice, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was i..,• °.1.01,D"' h t: not. :, �° , , �► `. •fi ` published in the entire issue of said newspaper for 0„,,__w_..2...,.....,._.. successive and t� i✓�l})�, "W, t;egllest by City of JA•,,•' �r.. , consecutive weeks in the following issues r �....._....„,................� `4.'§b ,A r ue OM name)to ,. ,; try. r ie, ortion lying . . ._,,. ................_.........._.....,_........._,...August & 19,2 976�. .. _.._..... ,. fi.. '.eras ty• t., ,una� i ;• .f i IX lair Street. '' , ''.. ( 1 attire) r� to w' i 1! ►xtion lying ” ,. .apt"�,'Q'r: ` f r t,,1'�tfyi ry ing S S. s Yf S. I}�',E'.'�..<,{jK, yr, . 7y.2 a.h4venue. ,° `.. R u , ( �!,`,1 .�R'F+'4 ;'itk,1.1$� Y' S; isaribed And sworn to before me this -9J day of ..,,.._ , tle"'(Old` ail~ 1C4 AVey : ., 'Mn .. orrice,lying,R E. of'� .W. Aug .S'6_7_6, 1: nit Strut running �. d.S A 1 kWh$ rt old name)' •'. . �� .. .. 4'11141._....... �'/ ,..,,_.,....., t" '► troo kside Court,portion •'; e ' r' Notary lic of Oregon „`�a � 0. .�if S.l1V`,'V�Tsttlt ` 3 end re Mining �y,200 feet, './..::, ..g.: e.; . `.`,:Post `good (old'dome) to- •• }•`,. My coinniission expires ..,_., ... .,.6,,. 19.�.! .W6► ',potion iyi g 1 ,, , 0. A LI I, Stuninartield WIWI ., a and 111,11010k S.&W.011ii feet. ,- - ft S, p�; Road (otd' nom ,.'to' '' S.W. G'reenis',Way portion lying. �'� S. of St Sum; rfieid Drive DESIGN!.l'1VIE - 1!..46:1:4 by th Coon it of l e,,�ity- � i�rae�vi�r: Board'decision on Jut 1,?'197 a ,,.. proving request by'-`, ti;as Land Company to construct•a; 16,oO • Altj7vriligiaPit� Street. �, Ate iriterested persons may'' ap ear i • and be`heard in favor of or against the ' aid��proposa1,,: ,.-1 BY ODE . ycoc l °,,. Doris'Ha g City Atleorder ` j' • • • I , A OF TIGAR F ��r_ ye""I A b� P. O. Box 23557 12420 S. W. Main F. �d ``! Tigard, Oregon 97223 �• August 11, 1976 Robert Fletcher 1750 S.W. Skyline Blvd. , suite 120 Portland, Oregon 97223 Re: File ZC 5-76 General Plan and Program Review of proposed Commercial- Office Park Planned Development located S.E. corner of S.W. 72nd Avenue and Varns Road (Wash. Co. Tax Map 251 1D, Tax Lot 900) Dear Mr. Fletcher: ,, Please be advised the Tigard City Council, at their regular meeting August 9th, set a public hearing regarding the above request for 8:00 P.M. , August 23rd, 1976 at Fowler Junior. High School Lecture Room, 10865 S.W. Walnut Street, • Tigard, Oregon. If you have any questions regarding the hearing, please feel free to contact me or the Planning Department. Sincerely, Doris Hartig City Recorder DH:lw Not The following acknowledgment must be received by the City of Tigard within fourteen (14) days of your. receipt of this letter. Failure to I do so may result in action by the City of Tigard. 1 hereby acknowledge this letter documenting the setting of Public Hearing by the Tigard City Council. Date Signature • 4b.A4d _ ,.0.r1-.-614nr oi.v ^RUN•MR. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 99 1976 1 ROLL CALIF: Present: Mayor Wilbur A. Bishop; Councilmen John E. Cook9 Alan W. Nickelson, Robert C. Moore, Lynn R. Wakem; Lieutenant Donald L. Rea', Police Department; J.D. Bailey, Legal Counsel; Richard. Bolen9 Planning Director; Bruce P. Clark, City Administrator; Doris Hartig, City Recorder; Arline 0,Leary. Administrative Assistant , 2. CALL TO AUDIENCE FOR THOSE DESIRING TO SPEAK ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS (a) Legal Counsel reported City of Tigard was being sued by Mr. Werner in regards to annexation of land which he was providing garbage services. Legal Counsel further reported there was no word on the PGE litigation. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - July 26 an0 August 29 1976. (a) Motion to approve: Councilman Cooks seconded by Councilman Wakem. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 4. APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES AND INVESTMENTS: $12222221 (a) Motion to approve: Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman • Wakem. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: Unified Sewerage Agency re: plant equipment. Metropolitan Service Dist. re: solid waste resource recovery program. (a) Motion to receive and file: Councilmen Cooky seconded by Councilman WaXem. Approved by Unanimous vote of Council. 6 SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS: (a) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Wakem to set the following items for public hearing on August 23, 1976 commencing at 800 P.M. at Fowler Junior High School: ( 1 ) ZONE CHANGE - Request by Fletcher, Hansen & Parson for a general plan and program review of a proposed commercial-office park Planned Development located at the southeast corner of S.W. 72nd Ave and S.W. yarns Rd. co, Tax Map 251 1D, Tax lot 900) . (2) RENAME EXISTING DED/CATED STREETS - Request by City of Tiard: a. S.W. 77th Avenue (ad name) to S.W. Cherry ")rive portion lying south of SW Yarns Street running south to SW Fir Street. • August 5, 1976 Robert Fletcher 1750 S.W. Skyline Blvd. Suite 120 Portland, Oregon 97223 File: MC 5-76 Dear Sir, Please be advised that the Tigard Planning Commission at their regular meeting of August 3, 1976, considered your request for ..' approval of a general plan and program review of a proposed commercial-office park planned development and your submission was approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The signing program for the entire park be subject to Design Review Board approval. • 2. That twenty along SW 72nd Avenue be dedicated for the future widening of Shy 72nd Avenue to arterial standards. 3. An agreement to participate in a local improvement district for the improvement of SW 72nd to City standards to an arterial street and the game type of agreement be attached to lots 9, :10 and 11 to bring yarns Street up to City local street standards, 4. A covenant to the deeds for lots 1-.8, 12 and 13 be executed prohibiting access to SW -072nd and SW Varns Streets. Lots 0, 10 and 11 which will have access to SW Varns shall be restricted from having through access to the internal street, 5. The setback from SW 72nd Avenue be 40' with a 10' intrusion • • allowable for no more than 1/3 of the lot width, if no other feasible option is available. 6. A 10' wide emergency vehicle access be provided along either lot 10 or 11 on a pedestrian path or to be constructed with 6 inches of base rock ovgrladeu with sod and signed at both SW Varna Street and the unnamed interior road. 7. Ahe internal street with a 20' pavement width be constructed to city standards for conrnercial streets and signed for no 1 parking. 8. The bus turnout lane be dedicated and improved as part of the SW 72nd Avenue loyal : xnproveinent district. O. Wheelchair ramps be constructed to city standards at the • , • • •• . • northwest corner of 1Qt 12, southwest and southeast corner • of lot 13, the northwest and northeast corner of lot 1 and the street median, • 10. A five foot utility easement be provided along all lot • . lines as deeded. •P 11. Access to lots 2, 5, and 12 be combined with adjaeent lots • . • and access to lot 9 be, combined with lot 8. Access to • lots 14 and 15 be provided on the north and south respectively and access to lots 1 and 13 be from the internal road, • not the entrance way. • , 12. The storm drainage and retention system be approved by the City Engineering Pepartment, Washington County Depart- . ment of Public Works and4the State Highway Department. ' • 13. A street opening perm# onto SW 72nd be acquired from Washington County Department of Public Works. H. 14. s-street lighting plat to city standards be approved by P.G.E. 15. All outright permitted uses allowed in the commercial- • professional zone be permitted and small-scale, Yimited research and development type of non-polluting industry in accordance with the conditional use chapter of the • Tigard Municipal Code,. . . 16. All remaining aspects of the development be constructed to applicable health, ,subdivision and zontng codes. If we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact this office, 039-4171. Sincerely, . . _ . • Richard Daniels • RD:sf Associate Planner • Note: The following acknowledgment must be received by the City of Tigard within fourteen (14) days of your receipt of nletpexl Failure acknowledgment may ttionihrcirggr I hereby acknowledge this letter documenting the action of the Tigard Planning Commission. I have received and read this letter • and I agree to the decision here documented and to abide by any terms and/or conditions attached . _ . signature cc: Building Official Engineering Dept, . . . . ., , . • . . . . (- l' . .. 'N.6,. . . AGENDA ' Tigard Planning Commission August 3, 1976 - 730 P.M. Twality Junior High School - Lecutre Room 14650 SW 97th Ave. , Tigard, Oregon • . 1 . CALL TO ORDER: :CALL ROLL 2. • 3 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: . , 4 . COMMUNICATIONS: ‘• , 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS : 5. 1 ZONE CHANGE ZC 4-73 (Farmers Insurance) . . A request by Farmers Insurance Group for an amendment to a planned development (signing program) located between SW . i 66th Avenue on the east and Highway 217 on the west , . . . (Wash , Co. Tax Map 281-1D, Tax lots 100, 200, 300, 400, . , 500, 501 , 701 , 1100) , 5. 2 ZOIlleANGE ZC 4-75 (Bunn) t ■ VP' . l ( /rOl Vie ''' ' request by Ken Bunn for general plan and program review of a proposed residential lanned Development located at , 6411*C 109th and Canterbury Lane. (Wash, Co. Tax Map 2S1 10AD, Tax lot S800) . , . , 5 , 3 ZONE CHANGE ZC 5-76 (Fletcher, Hansen & Parsons) ., A request by Fletcher, Hansen & Parsons for a general plan and program review of a proposed commercial-office park . I Planned Development located at the southeast corner of S .W. 72nd Avenue and S,W. Varns Road, (Wash , Co , Tax Map 2S1-11), Tax lot 900) , 5 .4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CU-21-76 (Fabric World) A request by Norris & Stevens, Realtors to locate a fabric store in a C-3 zone (General Commercial) at 12740-12760 S .W. Pacific Highway , (Wash , Co, Tax Map 2S1-2BD, Tax lot 1503) , 5 , 5 NON-CONFORMING USE NCU 1-76 (Marine Lumber) A request by Marine Lumber Company to restore a non- , , forming Use for a lumber storage building in a C-3 zone , . (General Commercial) at 11675 S .W. Pacific Highway . ('\ash. Co. Tax Map 181 3(3 C1 , Tax lot 100) , - . . Ili . CALt_ 11 ivon P] anning Commission August 3, 1976 - 7: 30 P.M. Twality Jr. High School Tigard, Oregon 6. SUBDIVISION 6. 1 Minor Land Partition MLP 3-76 (Burnham Tracts) A request by J. W. Atwood to partition a 5-3 acre parcel into 2 . 26 acres and 3 . 04 acres parcel on S .W. Hill St . , east of S .W. Ash St . (Wash Co. Tax Map 281 2B1J, Tax lot 200) . 7. OTHER BUSINESS Ab6CN 1"115-C)1/41 Si ADJOURNMENT 4 • e MINUTES Tigard Planning Commission August 3, 1976 - 7: 30 PM Page 4 E. Commission Discussion and Action : o Phillips expressed concern over setbacks if the road is shifted. o Krause asked that the matter be tabled until the sewer and street were resolved. o Bunn stated he would be willing to place the entire street improvement on his property. o Staff re-read letter from Jack Annand to clarify 1 , access problems . o Krause moved and Moore seconded to table the motion until the proposed street system was adequately shown on the site plan. The motion carried 8 to 1 with Phillips dissenting. ZONE CHANGE ZC 5-76 (Fletcher, Hansen & Parsons) A request by Fletcher, Hansen & Parsons for a general plan and program review of a proposed commercial-office park planned development located at the southeast corner of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Varns Road. (Wash , Co, Tax Map 281 1D, tax lot 900) . A. Staff Report : Read by Daniels o Basic Fact #4 was corrected to read June 15, 19761 o Staff presented applicants program booklet to the Commission . B. Applicant ' s Presentation o Robert Fletcher stated that he disagreed with condi- , tion #21 and asked that the complex be allowed to set their own restrictions on the proposed uses. o Krause asked that the applicant clarify what uses they would permit. o Berry Rand, Architect, stated that o ground rules would preclude objectionable firms : o diverse materials and styles would be permitted in the development • C MINUTES Tigard Planning Commission August 3, 1976 - 7: 30 PM Page 5 ' o Fletcher stated that the sidewalk would be a 4 ' wide, meandering, and of asphalt . 0 Mr. Hilton Smith -- realtor, stated that the mixed uses were needed for economic stability. C. Public Testimony o Paul Warner - neighbor stated that 72nd could not handle an additional traffic load. Staff read letter from Bloodworth and Peterson) architects, which expressed a desire for a common architectural theme in the Planned Development and objected to any industrial uses, D. Staff Recommendations Staff recommends approval with the following conditions : 1. The signing program for the entire park be subject to Design Review Board approval . \ 2. That twenty feet along SW 72nd Avenue be dedicated 1 . for the future widening of SW 72nd Avenue to arterial standards. 3, An agreement to participate in a local improvement district for the improvement of SW 72nd to City standards to an arterial street and the same type of agreement be attached to lots 9, 10 and 11 to bring Varns Street up to City local street standards. 4 , A covenant to the deeds for lots 1-8 , 12 and 13 be executed prohibiting access to SW 72nd and SW Varns St , Lots 9, 10 and 11 which will have access to SW Varns shall be restricted from having through access to the internal street. 5. The setback from SW 72nd Avenue be 40 ' with, a 10 ' intrusion allowable for no more than 1/3 of the lot width, if no other feasible option is available. G. A 10 ' wide emergency vehicle access be provided along either lot 10 or 11 on a pedestrian path or • to be constructed with 6 inches of base rock over- laden with sod and signed at both SW Varns Ste and the unnamed interior road. 7. The internal street with a 20 ' pavement width be constructed to city standard for commercial streets and signed for no parking. • .., . . , . . . - - , '-. . . , • , - . . . . . , . 1 . . , , , . MINUTES Tigard Planning Commission , ,. , August 3, 1976 - 7: 30 PM 1" .,. .: ,, Page 6 : '. ,. • S. The bus turnout lane be dedicated and improved as . . , . part of the SW 72nd Avenue local improvement district . 9 . Wheelchair ramps be constructed to city standards at • . the northwest corner of lot 12, southwest and south- , east corner of Lot 13, the northwest and northeast , : .% corner of Lot 1 and die street median . . , 10 . A five foot utility easement be provided along all lot lines as deeded. ) ? . , 11 . Access to lots 2, 5, and 12 be combined with adjacent 1 ' ,., lots and access to lot 9 be combined with lot S. . Access to lots 14 and 15 be provided on the north and . . .. * south respectively and access to lots 1 and 13 be from the internal road , not the entrance way. , . . 12. The storm drainage and retention system be approved , , by the City Engineering Department , Washington County . Department of Public Works and the State Highway . .• Department . , . . , 13, A street opening permit onto SW 72nd be acquired from v4... Washington County Department of Public Works. , 14. A street lighting plan to city standards be approved , • by P,G.E. 1 . i 15 . All outright permitted uses allowed in the commercial- 4- ' professional zone be permitted and small-scale, limited research and development type of non-polluting industry in accordance with the conditional use chapter of the Tigard Municipal Code, _ I 16, All remaining aspects of the development be con- structed. to applicable health, subdivision and zoning codes, . , E , Commission Discussion and Action . . . o Staff pointed out that the major unresolved issue is I • • with the proposed uses and that the reduced size of 6 , the street to 20 ' pavement width would limit the . industrial uses , o Staff clarified the intent of condition 15 stating ., that as proposed a limited number of small scale non office uses would be allowed only after Planning r Commission review through the conditional use prp- . , visions of the Tigard Municipal. Code, and that the . Design Review floard would decide whether the architec- ture was compatible. ) . i . 1 i o MINUTES cr Tigard Planning ComMIssion August 3, 1976 - 7 : 30 PM Page 7 Goldbach moved and Phillips seconded that the motion be approved with the Staff Recommendations. 0 : The motion was carried 8 to 1 with Nicoli dissenting. 5.4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CU 21-76 (Fabric World) A request by Norris & Stevens, Realtors, to locate a fabric store in a C-3 zone (General Commercial) at 12740-12760 SW Pacific Highway. (Wash. Co . Tax Map 2S1 28D, tax lot 1503) , A. Staff Report : Read by Daniels. B. Applicant ' s Presentation: • • o Fred Young of Norris and Stevens Realtors explained the proposed use, presented the landscape plan and asked that traffic be directed onto SW McKenzie Street by a left turn lane from SW Pacific Highway. C. Public Testimony None D. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 1 . That a seven foot landscape strip be established between the sidewalk and the parking area. 2 , That the southern most curb cut be closed and re- . placed by sidewalk. This would leave a centrally placed curb cut on Pacific and one on McKenzie St1 which actually serves as a driveway for the center. 3. That the north front of the building not being used for parking or walkway (circled in red on the plan) be landscaped. • 4 , That planting strips be established at approximately 70 ' on center each way in the parking lot , 5 That the tenants of Village Square work together on forming one sign that would satisfy their existing and future needs, 6 , That the illegal signs on site be removed, 7, That the proposed sign and landscape plan be subject to Design Aeview, 0 Staff noted that recommendations 1, 2, and 8 were shown on the landscape plan , , . C STAFF REPORT Agenda 5. 3 Tigard Planning Commission ,August 3, 1976 - 7: 30 P.M. • Twality Junior High School - Lecture Room Tigard, Oregon • DOCICET: ZONE CHANGE ZC 5• 76 REQUEST: General Plan and Program Review of a Commercial Office Park LOCATION: SE corner of SW 72nd and SW Varns Rd. (Wash, Co. tax map H. 2S1 1D, tax lot 500) APPLICANT: Hanson-Fletcher-Parsons • BASIC FACTS: 4" 1 . The site is designated "General Industrial" on the Tigard • H Community Plan and zoned M-4, Industrial Park Planned • Development . 2, The site is presently in forest cover of mainly first and 1 . second growth Douglas Fir, Oak, Spruce, Ash and Alder trees with dense underbrush, ferns and moss , Si The surrounding land use is primarily undeveloped with pro- fessional offices to the east , single family homes on very large lots to the north and south, and residences along SW 72nd Avenue to the west . 4. The Planning Commission on July 15, 1976, approved the H. preliminary plan and program with the following conditions : 1 . Lot size, right-of-way width, pavement width, setbacks, curve radii be noted code deviations. 2 , Signing program for entire park be submitted to the Design Review Board. 3, That an additional 20 feet of right-of-way on 72nd be dedicated, and the applicant file with the City Recorder a non-remonstrance agreement for full street improvements to SW 72nd Street in accordance with Public Works Standards. , 4. Jed Covenants be executed restricting access from SW Varns and SW 72nd Avenue. 5, The center line curve rad:q be no less than 50 feet. The setback from SW 72nd be 40 feet with a 10 Toot intrusion allowable for no more than 1 /3 of the lot width, if no other feasible option is available. Use of this setback area is needed to site a proposed building, and/or parking area. • Staff Report Agenda 5 , 3 , Tigard Planning Commission August 3, 1976 ( Page 2 • 7. Secondary emergency vehicle access would be provided from Varns Street as an addition to the footpath system or be constructed with six foot base rock overladen with sod and signed at both SW Varns and the interior road, • 8. A street cross section be submitted for Engineering Department review prior to General Plan and Program Review. 9 . The bus turnout lane be dedicated and improved as part of the SW 72nd L. I .D. 10 . Standard wheelchair ramps be provided at the northwest corner of Lot 12, S.W. and S .E. corner of Lot 13 and the N.W, and N.E, corner of Lot 1 , cross section of the ramps and path be subject to Engineering Department approval . 11 . A path be provided along either the inside or outside of the interior road or internal to Lots 14 and 15 and provision for crossing the traffic island be shown, •.,•• 12 , A five foot utility easement be provided along all property lines as deeded. 13 . Access to Lots 2, 5, and 12 be combined with adjacent lots and access to Lot 9 be combined with Lot 8 , Access to Lots 14 and 15 be provided on the north and south respectively and access to Lot 1 and 13 be from the , internal road, not th .? entrance way , 14 . All utilities serving; this site be underground, 35. Location and design of storm and sanitary sewer and water lines and drainage retention system be submitted • to City Engineering Department and Washington County Public Works Department for approval prior to General Plan Review. 16 . Landscaping plan for each parcel be reviewed by the Design Review Board prior to issuance of building permit • by City, 17 . Accss street opening permit on SW 72nd lie acquired from Washington County Public Works Department. 18 , Road improvements and signing be constructed prior to issuance of building permits . 19 , A street lighting plan be submitted for City approval , • Staff Report ' Agenda 5 . 3 Tigard Planning Commission 6 August 3, 1976 Page 3 • 20 . All remaining aspects of the development be constructed to applicable health, subdivision and zoning codes. 21 . All uses permitted outright in the Community Plan zone be permitted in the planned development . • 22 . Architectural compatability be defined before the ,• General Plan is adopted. FINDINGS : 1 . The applicant is requesting approva.:1 of a commercial office • planned development to allow office uses and limited associated uses. • 2 . Except for those listed below, the conditions of the pre- liminary approval have been incorporated into the General Plan and Program or are satisfied during construction and design review. (6) No mention is made in the program for the setback from SW 72nd Avenue . (7) The program mentions an emergency access but no location is established, • (11) The applicant wishes to maintain the traffic/pedestrian separation by the provision of the perimetPr path instead of sidewalks along the internal street. (i 3) No provision for access combination is shown , ( 15) Drainage needs to be provided onto the Highway 237 right- of-way, ( 21 ) The applicant has provided a list of industrial uses that they are proposing, 3. All of the proposed land uses listed in the program are not appropriate for. this site and can be more properly located in other areas already zoned, However, for their use, there are some small scale, limited assembly uses that could function in the proposed development , This can be handled best by making any use other than those allowed, in the q-P zone a conditional use . However, general industrial, uses will not be compatible with the access provided or the setting of the office park. Staff Report Agenda 5. 3 ' Tigard Planning Commission August 3, 1976 - ( Page 4 4 . The applicant is proposing the creation of 15 lots. Subdivision approval is necessary. 5 . Access could be provided off SW Varns Street for lots 9, 10, and 11 but through access between Varns and the interior street should be restricted to avoid the use of these parcels as informal access into and out of the project . CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS: 1 . The proposal for a commercial office park with associated uses and dedication of additional right-of-way is consistent with the Tigard Community Plan. 2. The noted deviations to the Tigard Municipal Code are warranted by the projects design, amenities and limited types uses allowed, 9. The proposal is in harmony with the surrounding area with the additional setback from SW 72nd Avenue and the retention of much of the existing vegetation. 4, Although the development will be in individual ownerships, • the open space will be guaranteed by the maximum lot coverage (60%) proposed in the General Plan and Program. 5. The controlled mixing of uses with gererous setbacks would • • not have been possjble without the parcel developing as a planned development . 6 The applicant has stated their ability to substantially complete the public improvements portion of the project within one year with the individual tenants building as the seperate lots are sold, 7, The applicant has demonstrated a public need for a planned development of small , owner-occupied commercial offices and associated uses , 8. There is a public benefit to have the parcel in question develop as a commercial office park as opposed to general industrial uses, 9. Due to the extensive natural vegetation , the site in question is uniquely suited for a commercial office park, • _ Agenda 5. 3 August 3, 1976 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. The signing program for the entire park be subject to Design Review Board approval . 2. That twenty feet along SW 72nd Avenue be dedicated for the future widening of SW 72nd Avenue to arterial standards. 3. An agreement to participate in a local improvement district for the improvement of SW 72nd to City standards to an arterial street and the same type of agreement be att; hed to lots 9, 10 and 11 to bring Varns Street up to City local street standards. 4. A covenant to the deeds for lots 1-8, 12 and 13 be executed prohibiting access to SW 72nd and SW Varns Streets, Lots 9, 10 and 11 which will have access to S .W. Varns shall be H restricted, from having through :Access to the internal street . 5. The setback from SW 72nd Avenue be 40 ' with a 10 intrusion allowable for no more than 1/3 of the lot width, if no other feasible option is available. 6 . A 10 ' wide emergency vehicle access be provided along either lot 10 or 11 on a pedestrian path or to be constructed with 6 inches of base rock overladen with sod and signed at both SW Varns Street and the unnamed interior road. 7. The internal street with a 20 ' pavement width be constructed to city standards for commercial streets and signed for no • parking. • 8. The bus turnout lane be dedicated and improved as part of the SW 72nd Avenue local improvement district . 9 Wheelchair ramps be constructed to city standards at the northwest corner of lot 12, southwest and southeast corner of Lot 13, the northwest and northeast corner % c Lot 1 and the street median . 10, A fivc foot utility easement be provided along all lot JilICS • as deeded . • 11 , Access to lots 2, 5, and 12 be combined with adjacent lots and access to lot 9 be combined with lot 8. Access to lots • 14 and 15 be provided on the north and south respectively and access to lots 1 and 13 be from the internal roqd, not the entrance way, ,A4 s * Agenda 5. 3 August 3, 1976 Page 2 12. The storm drainage and retention system be approved by the City Engineering Department, Washington County Depart- ment of Public Works and the State Highway Department . 13. A street opening permit onto SW 72nd be acquired from Washington County Department of Public Works. • 14. A street lighting plan to city standards be approved by P.G.E. 15. All outright permitted uses allowed in the commercial- professional zone be permitted and small-scale, limited research and development type of non-polluting industry in accordance with the conditional ase chapter of the Tigard Municipal Code. 16. Al]. remaining aspects of the development be constructed to applicable health, subdivision and zoning codes. • 7 Agenda 5. 3 August 3, 1976 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 1 . The signing program for the entire park be subject to Design Review Board approval . . 2 . That twenty feet along SW 72nd Avenue be dedicated for the future widening of SW 72nd Avenue to arterial standards . 3 . An agreement to participate in a local improvement district for the improvement of SW 72nd to City standards to an arterial street and the same type of agreement be attached to lots 9, 10 and 11 to bring Varns Street up to City local street standards. 4 . A covenant to the deeds for lots 1-8 , 12 and 13 be executed prohibiting access to SW 72nd and SW yarns Streets. Lots 9, 10 and 11 which will have access to S .W. Varns shall be restricted from having through access to the internal street . 5. The setback from SW 72nd Avenue be 40 with a 10 ' intrusion allowable for no more than 1/3 of the lot width, if no other feasible option is available. 6. A 10 ' wide emergency vehicle access be provided along either lot 10 or 11 on a pedestrian path or to be constructed with 6 inches of base rock overladen with sod and signed at both SW Varns Street and the unnamed interior road. 7, The internal street with a 20 ' pavement width be constructed to city standards for commercial streets and signed for no parking. 8 . The bus turnout lane be dedicated and improved as part of the SW 72nd Avenue local improvement district . 9 . Wheelchair ramps be constructed to city standards at the norihwest corner of lot 12, southwest and southeast corner of Lot 13, the northwest and northeast corner of Lot 1 and the street median . 10. A five foot utility easement be provided along all lot lines as deeded. 11 . Access to lots 2, 5, and 12 be combined with adjacent lots and access to lot 9 be combined with lot 8. Access to lots 1.1 ..A.1 15 be provided on the north and south respectively and access to lots 1 and 13 be from the internal road, not the entrance way, 111 -Agenda 5. 3 • August 3, 1976 Page 2 12 . The storm drainage and retention system be approved by the City Engineering Department, Washington County Depart- ment of Public Works and the State Highway Department . 13. A street opening permit onto SW 72nd be acquired from Washington County Department of Public Works. 14 . A street lighting plan to city standards be approved by P .G.E. 15. All outright permitted uses allowed in the commercial- professional zone be permitted and small-scale, limited research and development tyre of non-polluting industry in accordance with the conditional use chapter of the Tigard Municipal Code. 16. All remaining aspects of the development be constructed to applicable health, subdivision and zoning codes. • • • • 1 Bloodworth, Peterson, Ellis & Es lick, Partners, Architects 7000 Southwest Varns Street Portland,Oregon 97223 (503)639-9430 RECENED August 3, 1976 AUG :3 1976 CITY OF TIGARD city of Tigard Planning Commission 12420 S.W. Main Tigard, Oregon 97223 Gentlemen: We object vigorously to the proposed PUD on the property contiguous to our west property line. We are not in opposition to the proper development of this acreage, but if it is going to be a "Planned Unit Development", then we feel that this is exactly what it should be and that all buildings or structures, roads, parking, landscaping, etc. should be designed before any approval of the develop- ment. We personally would prefer to see it developed into office space and not any industrial use. • We were not in opposition to the prior design • of the offices that were to be built under another proposal. It seems' to us that, if handled properly, the acreage could be benefi- cial not just unto itself, but to the neighbor- hood in general, and could be an excellent buffer area between the industrial and residen- tial neighborhoods . Sincerely yours, Robert L. Bloodworth Idkv ofrti William D, Peterson jP Robert 1,Bloodworth M.A., William D.Peterson A,I.A,, Prank A.I,A„ Richard H.0,EslIck A.I.A. L y L/ i'I ) • , s �. ,. /Y AFFIDAVIT Oi PUBLICATION puBL "; HEARINGS AGENDA • i STATE OF OREGON, , Tigard Planning Commission " . ss. August 3, 1976••-- 7:30 P.M., . COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, Twality Junior High School --Lecture Room "14650 SW 97th Ave.,„ Tigard, Oregon I, _..._..............J.._,.s.eph.._.S.ctha.i e.r_..__.._._ __.�...__._...w._..__.......w._ ......._. ► 5.1'ZONE CHANGE ZC 4-73 (Farm- being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the publisher - ---.. •--. ers Insurance)--A request by Farmers Insurance Group for an amendment to • •, of The Tigard Times, a newspaper o£ general circulation, as defined a planned development (signing pro- ��.••_ .w. grans)”located between.SW.66th Ave- nue on the east and Highway 217 on • by ORS 193.010 and 193.020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and the west.(R►ash.Co:`Tax Map 2S1-ID, Tax lefts 100,200,300,900,500,501,701,-. state; that the legal notice, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was 1100), :.• ` ' 5.2 ZONE CHANGE ZC,4-75 (Bunn)1 successive and ---Arequest by Ken Bunn for general published in the entire issue of said newspaper for .� ..- -.--- plan and program review of the proposed residential Planned Develop- consecutive weeks in the following issues ..�._•...---------•-•-- �•-----•� ••�•-�• •----�--- ment located at 109th and Canterbury • Lane, (Wash. Co. Tax Mal: 2S1 IOAD, • July 22 &_a,�.....�7.�._.-....._...........�.....�..�..�._...�....------- T lot x800). ° 5.3 ,ZONE C H A l'd G E ZC 5-76 � � �r.-:.�..-� ..� ..�.� �...-.� ( ete1 er, Hansen & Parsons) —- Are- ,' Sign) re) quest by Fletcher, Hansen & Parsons' for a general plan and program review . of,a proposed commercial-office park ' Subscribed and sworn to before me this _....:.. .. 29h.•--••-••---- day of -....._._--_. Planned Development located at the .southeast corner of S.W:72nc1 Avenue and S.W.Varns Road. (Wash.Co. Tax 1 e L1 196. Map 2Sl-XD,'Tax lot 900), --.." .....".' el 5:4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT •M wMr /el4 ,/ CU621-76 (Fabric World) -- A request q�:! .�. •� by Norris&Stevens,Realtors to locate �''f Notary P lie of Oregon a fabric store in a‘C-3 zone (General (/ Commercial)at 12740-12760 S.W.Pacit-At; is Highway, (Wash, Co,Tax Map 251- My commission expires -M.a_.--..-..... .Z.I •a •t,P 1.9. , 2BD,Tax lot 1503)4 ' . / / tl __-__ . _ 5;5 NON-CONFORMING USE NCU _.-... ------• 1-76(Marine Lumber) -- A request by Marine Lumber Company to restore a non-conforming use for a lumbe'ti , storage building in a C•3 zone(General ' Commercial) at 11675 S.W. Pacific Highway. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 181 36CD,Tax lot 100). 6. SUB MVISION . 6.1 Minor Lluid Partition MLP 3-76 (Burnham Tracts) --, A request by J. ' W.Atwood to partition a 5-3 acre partly eel into 2,20 acres and 3.04 acres parcel on S.W.'Hill St., east of S.W. Ash St. (Wash Co, Tax Map 2S1 2BD, Tax, lot , r':4.:... 200), 7,OTHER BUSINESS tl 8,ADJOURNMENT: H (TT28�35 -- Publish July 22, 29, 1976) { tl a I 11 tl .0 • •I . AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard • I, Sandra L. Fite being first duly sworn, on oath depose and say: That I am Secretary for the 'lanning Department for the City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served notice of hearing of the Tigard Planning Commission of which the attached is a cor., y (Marked Exhibit A) upon each of the following named po.osons on the day • of 1973. , by mailing to each ofTEem at the nddro58) shOwn on the attached list (rarked Exhibit B) „ said notice as hereto attached , deposited in the United States • Tail on the day of 197/ postage prepaid. Subscribed and sworn to before me on this eVy7(12._ day of ; i9i . r • .04 Notary ( ublie of Oregon s: NY oomm#sion exPirost , I, p .. . _ • . 1 - 1 ZONE CHANGE 5:i-76 . .. • • ... ......._ ag S Vi GONZAE A i 7., < < -- I ir . rli a rn 111 rn . ill * HA PT•N 1.. . '.:.,-, ,,,,,,. _ - i .,,,,, '77''.,:ZK,.\'.:1>,..'''ITCC:.="e.!,.'"TMZ.*.=;.74.Z.'ZT''''n.;'"_:;C."-li'-:T'J,IaT'-''L.1....:1,..'W.E.. 1..-[1-,ST:E.451E11 ilit 'r ' ''''''4-i 4,,.• 4:„. .. . .P''''zz,..„,, \\N \\:6 I."'°A.'1-' ' :t< .1 --'4:44474z\r.-yrz,-.m.-..,.11.m.-...r.,'ra,.7a ....,,F--' .., -( ' : ''''* Ili . , c 1,, ,..z, , I 1L, ,' „lc, ,;,, e 2 t, A . ,f ,,_, .,,,,, ‘.„ s IN IRIVI I STREET - _...,„........... 4.421 • I "KA, --,,•-•,,,,,,..Mr;t"---,---.',74.-5-,-,•-•r ,•-.„-,r,-,71,-77, ,Ir.,Y=471::::1137■",47Z.:144...7L. ' :,YZVrss7-171'1",1r7,2"4=...Z.Z..%,711....,,,,r, .,si.„(4.,:,.,,.. ._,,,,„_,,,, .„.„‘„,..„1„,„_,_=...„ ,, , . ,_4--it-9727,,,y,..ty.7..' --- I 1 ______ ,ot i. • . 1 HIT., ', ,,\ \,; __..—.. • 14. ,.. _ __,.,._ .,_....... _ _ ...._i. _.„_. , . . 1 1....] 1 • 4 a S Li_j VA fi N S _ . 1- ,,, ‘ ., _ ..._.„ .4, STREET I i AAAAAAAA•AAAA.AAAAAAAAAAAAAA•AAAAAAAAAAAAAA■AAAA•■•, .-7:s.,*lira*'''://". - 4---- -- •'+, . .*0.............,...........,........ —,., L— -.4 . `...:.:.;.;.:.:.;....,.......................,...x.:•;.x.x., ..,,,, 1.---- ..................,..:.:,.. ..::.......,..., 1_ f — 01 _1 :•:',...:,:::.:::::•*:4::4:::::,::::::,::::,:i:::`,::::,::::::::::::::::::::::i:i.. 4, • 1:4 = 4,,,,,. t It .1 li i:::;:::::,k'i:41::::::■:::Mii:.0MI:i:f;i:Xiliii:iiii".:,.4. 'W; C p ,-. p D ...] , , .,,.....f.N:4 ::::::: 1 t r11 4 S W M r l R :,::iii,:1,:;?::::,.;!;:i.::::1:;‘,;;*,Sfi.:,;;;:::::,:i:::::ifli";;;:i:;:;;;;I'k S T R E T i:::.:•:;:::•::::::.::.:::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::;;;;:,:i;i:;;;;i:k1 ,, - .„ _ , – _ ,, ---- __.... ,— — ::•:.:::':.:.;.:.:.:.''7:1:::.:;:•::::::::.;.;:;:;:;::;;;'. 4,, , ', "'""' ":1*::ii`i*:6::*('-''';:"..!*.t......"...X.'.:.X.N1 V 4.4,, . ,...............,./.N.4,!+,.: ',(7.h.::::::::::.:.:::.:.:.:.:.; '''''''''''41'''''''':k4i:'%.*:';:'''-I't':....:.:.:.:.:.:•:,:.:.:.: . , :':::'::::::::::::::',..:;..t...7..X.:•:•::.:::::::.:.:,../....:.:....:..ot .4,, .... . •. t, ur---- :■::::::%1::::::4::::::::::::::::::::::::.:`404/4.:::.:•::::::;:::::: A , , ..4.4.40.4.4.40:4.404.4.:44..4.'4''....X.X.X.:•:...:.:...........,..0:4 Npiti it. P, %■:::::::::::::::::::;:i:::::::;**.:*i*i*iV:iii**1:i0.1 9. ,, w._,..........., , I 1, . f..........a*, '-".."'. '.."."...*".......‘...:..!....:11.....,Lt,W.,}..,,.1.1... . .: % . A.A ,--a....,• • • • 4 --,1 k,t,. . ._,... s ANDBURG z,--=-1,,,-,cir.1.,,.z.=.: !;',-It-,17.. - ,, -,...._i, .,., . ,,.. .-- , yt,,,,,x,rszserit„.1.. ,. .. .."-----' — - ' '-;-. -''''—'---='---- •----- , ..4r.....4,Z.L.l'i.iluk..,........,..,...at ,. - r.:7.....=-41=ttr'...«...t.Z.r,.......=.1-Zz......n-2.13;:it.....m.. .4. ivi 4 ,. • [sTREET .,,, ..,. - - •- L._ -.,-,,,r7%.".*•,,,r"-*--' ''. , ,,'"'"`"',',"--01.7.1".":=1,10t5`2,11'4'.....e...-":','"iL7Z::::.Z"Z■ti% '........z...P1.4...14,1......21aZiZt.....4.1.4.1..............44...... l'. , . , M ,,,, 2 ''A I 1...1-44*--4- -- ':4 i ._., - -., ... •-,..,-,..,.,..,.,,-.,..a....-‘....*,..,...-...-=,....1...-+.......toroi-aa ■ ^" 4'r-;-:41.,...,,-;.'zItzEf:ztill,k:r.....-:-...:-..,-t:..:::-;t;272,.,..„ },P ' ........-... . . A Ai A...AAA • 4.'". \ 1 4'.%I.,,,,„ ri A. . ' A • • t A... .,, ..........................11nR.A.AAAMITIMMAAVAAt.A.MalfflgelietAktMelleAMMOMMIAAMINIIIIIisimaiNintaillitaillaillillillillillgiriMil . . _ . .. • ., - , . - -- , , te, ,,.......:._......,_ ,,,t......,..k '- ' ._ 71 23) CITY OF TIGAR D, i::::-.4 ,A„, 4.„, -.et. _• ' ,_:._k - 1.4.--,11- '7" 6 ,....„0.4.. tr,il PO..Box 23557 4444 (3.. ...-- - 1.--,.;..," r3.,..'-- l' 7 '4-.-4-411Itt z4.41#::-1:4--MT,:i4gr'A 12420 S.Vi_' Main -. .....-.. -F 0- 2 --Jti —•:.,,,, .,i. Tigard,Oregon 97223- - \,.., a-:, -..,'-'.-if ,:- ,...n..-3D,1- 7.--c....%-x----1--",,,,,a72,1.Sr...PVirl--.4 ,9 ' --'_:;--L: -*!--4... AV:-,-9,-, ..iits.-F.:.-.,RAI Al.•Ni-r-rt ir--..- _ 4 , ..,7. . /4. f; . i Joseph Flught .,......---____ ... t.4...—,'. _ .. ..... P ft - -• - _ - - - -- —.:.._—_—_--,---, - -. It. p - g -?'.4t,-, , -....--..-° , ——' "''-'''' '..■''' ...s., A a AC' - 4, -.-• '..t ,..„_ Tr;I _ r - •+- -- ,- - ", -c-. P i,-.... ::-?.H*' ' ' Tit Tt 'tp:7 7 ''',11 3 . -. ,, -4 1—..„.....,_ ..-....-..-- .-- _--,-.•=..=•==.-.,.•,=•=..-... _ . . , . •-,"; IIt- .- t . . • .,• • exitheir ,.iarked „:. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROGRAM FOR A COMMERCIAL PARK SUBDIVISION AS A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT S. W. 72nd Avenue & Varns Road Tigard, Oregon, • July 16, 1976 iegCellatgP 111/0 :...; . . CAMF'BELL/YOST/GR UBE P.C. ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 2040 S. W. Jefferson Street Portland, Oregon 97201 ...„. . .. . . -- . . .. ____ • ......_.__, . ..,. . ,,. .. It i . . , , • , ... INDEX . , „ ,.... TITLE PAPE -.... 1 . SITE DESCRIPTION 1 # .. 2. PLANNING CONCEPT 1 thru 4 . „. . i 3. APPLICANT'S MARKET ANALYSIS 5 .. i ,'. 4. PROPOSED OWNERSHIP PATTERN 5 I 5. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROPOSAL 5 :...,, ..'-' 1 6. WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES 5 . • 7. LIGHTING 6 I I .. i . ' I 8. WATER SUPPLY 6 1 . .., 9. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 6 10. FIRE PROTECTION 6 ., . .., i • 11 . PROPOSED DESIGN TEAM 6 , 1 12. PROPOSED DEVIATIONS OR VARIANCES 7 thru 8 .• i 13. EXHIBITS , . . 1 . . .. • ; . . , , . 7 . , ■ 1 1, r. _ Iii . - , il . 0 1 . SITE DESCRIPTION: 1 . ° ri The site is a 9.36 acre forested parcel of land, approximately square, located i'.' adjacent to the intersection of S . W. 72nd Avenue and S . W. Varns Road. , S . W. 72nd Avenue adjoins the property to the west and S. W. Varns Road '. il adjoins the property to the north. The land is gently sloping to the southwest, naturally draining in that direction to S . W. 72rA Avenue. The site vegetation generally consists of first and second growth Douglas Fir trees, large Oak frees, scrub Oak trees, Spruce trees, large Oregon Ash trees, scrub Alder trees and Vine Maples. The forest floor is covered with dense underbrush, ferns and moss. 1 2. PLANNING CONCEPT: , , The objective of the owner and design team is to develop a viable commercial •', iproject which preserves the natural characteristics of the site to the largest possible extent and is compatible in scale and use to the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed development will consist of a subdivision for a commercial office 1, park with related uses in accordance with CP cnd M4 zoning. Listed below are methods which the owner and design team will utilize to achieve 1 their objective, . By widening the right-of-way of S. W. 72nd Avenue by 20 feet and by providing a bus turn-out lane as shown on the preliminary development ,, plan. i , , By providing a 40 foot landscaped buffer along S . W. 72nd Avenue providing that the adjacent property zoning remain residential. If zoning should be v', changed to CP, buffer would become 20' wide. By providing a 15 foot landscaped buffer along the remaining three sides, including a pedestrian path around existing tree locations. . By providing an internal public road of 20 feet with a right-of-way of 36 feet and additional landscaped set-back buffers on both sides 1 By introducing a covenance of design criteria for all lots of the subdivision as follows: v A. Land Coverage . , Land Area (9.36 acres) 407,720 s.f. Less 10' widening of S, W, 72nd Avenue 12,740 s„f. 394,980 s,f, Subdivision Excluding goad 350,100 s.f. = 10010 i 1 . 11 , 2. PLANNING CONCEPT: (continued) 2. Max. Parking & Building Area 210,060 s.f. = 60% My Landscaped Area 140,040 s.f. =40% B. Lot Coverage r . Building & Parking: Max. building and parking not to exceed 60% of lot area. Landscaping: Min. landscaping 40% of lot urea. C . Setback (requirements Buildin g Frontyard 20 feet 2 story 15 feet 1 story S ide and 15 feet 2 story Y 10 feet 1 story Backyard 25 feet 2 story 20 {Feet 2 story • Parking: Frontyard 10 feet Sideyard 5 feet . a Backyard 10 feet D. Building Height 1 I Not to exceed a height of two floors or 35 feet except as provided under the conditional use provisions of the CP and M4 zoning regulations. E. Building Exterior Walls: To be in glass or wood finish as shingles, siding, board and batten, or unit masonry. VioNprefabricated metal or pre-cast concrete panels shall be allowed. No vertical wall shall be higher than 251 . • Roofs: 75% f building roofs may be level. 25% of building roofs shall be sloped with a minimum pitch of 30 degrees. Signing: A signing program will be developed to integrate all individual building identification. Building identification shall be free standing no higher than 41 high and ground illuminated. Size and location of directory signs at access points to be specified. • II • , 2. PLANNING CONCEPT: (continued) '//7/7". °) "l /7/7". 3 [ Lighting: A street and exterior site lighting program will be developed to integrate project lighting. Lighting • shall be free standing, shielded to a maximum height of 15' . Landscaping and building feature lighting shall be • low level . F. Traffic & Vehicular Circulation Vehicular circulation enters and exits the project from S. W. 72nd Avenue at the Fir Street alignment, loops internally through the project in a 20' wide one-way road system serving all sites. '. It is anticipated there will be no external access to any site from S. W. 72nd or S. W. Vans Road. An unpaved emergency vehicle access to the internal traffic loop system will be provided by easement from S . W. Varns either within setback areas between building sites or by connection with a developed parking area. G . Pedestrian Circulation The project development will serve pedestrians by providing access to t individual buildings within the site by meads of a il.�..' ic.l paved walk. The walk will meander around the, periphery of the site within the exterior ldndscd;aed buffer strip. The walk will provide pedestrian access from the future bus stop to all site.J. • IH. Utilities All utility systems will be constructed underground within an 8 foot wide easement which will be located within the internal vehicular • right-of-way. A 5 foot wide easement will be provided at all deeded property lines. I . Landscaping Existing landscaping features to be preserved and to be supplemented with new plant material as specified. Parking areas to be designed to preserve maximum number of existing trees by providing landscaped islands around )''Jrypj6f existing trees where possible. Existing frees larger than 6'10 cannot be removed without permission, . J, Design Control All proposed site planning, building and landscaping lighting and sign features have to be submitted to a Design Red iew Board established by the owners for approval of compliance with the covenance. Adjacent buildings will be considered by the Desi ;-: review Board to achieve continuity and harmony of building forms, materials, color and texture throughout the project, %Gel %1?-", 2. PLANNING CONCEPT: (continued) 4. ( • / ' K. Proposed Land Use `` tivel`� The development objective of this project is to provide a mixture of • . , low-density commercial office, commercial professional and limited ' light industrial uses that are compatible with each other and the surrounding industrial, office, and residential neighborhood. Therefore, 1 the following uses are proposed: i 1 . MI uses permitted in a commercial professional zone (C.-P). 2. Uses permitted in an Industrial Park Zone (M-4) as listed below: . (a) Assembly and manufacturer of electrical appliances, electronic instruments and devices, radios, phonographs and television and components thereof. A (b) Assembly of metal products. (c) laboratories, experimental, dental, medical, photo or motion picture research or testing. (d) Manufacturer of musical instruments. �, (e) Manufacturer of optical goods, scientific and precision instruments and equipment. E (f) Manufacturer of artificial limbs, dentures, hearing aids, �. surgical instruments and dressings and other devices employed P Y . \,,' ‘ ,,1 by medical and dental professions. (g) Medicine and pharmaceutical manufacturer. (h) Office buildings and bank.''''k..1\ Q,...,f, (i) Research, development and testing laboratories. i \:Y.,/ (j) Warehousing when related to above uses. (k) Any other use held similar to the above uses as approved '' - by the planning commission. 3. No uses will be permitted which emit noxious odors or loud noises, which require outside storage or which eritor l manufacturing using i. heavy equipment. . v � I 5. ' 3. APPLICANT'S MARKET ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED USE: ' ;► y Owner's survey of the market for economical less than one acre) sites for the construction of smaller buildings for office and associated uses, reveals a lack of inventory of readily buildable sites of this size. The greatest demand in the Tigard area is for office and associated use space by corporations developed b orations P P and other businesses for their own use, not for general occupancy. Most available sites are over 1 .5 acres in size with a price range of $3.00 to $4.00 per square foot. The economics of sites with values of over $150,000 for buildings of less than 15,000 square feet in floor area are prohibitive. The demand for owner- ' occupied office buildings in the size range of 4,000 to 10,000 square feet is strong. The owner's plan to provide one-half acre sites meets the demand for this g p p type of space with a quality environment at reasonable costs per site of $50,000 to $75,000. 4. PROPOSED OWNERSHIP PATTERN: , • The owners of the property for the proposed Tigard Office Park intend to sell fully developed sites for the construction of smaller but dings for office and I associated uses. These would be sold on a "fee simple" basis. A property owners' association will be formed which will enforce the design, construction and main- tenance standards of all individual properties and assure their conformance to the • I restrictive covenants established in the Tigard Office Park. 5, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROPOSAL: Sewer, water, road, electrical, telephone and gas services will be maintained by the public agency or private utility responsible for providing said services. 1 Construction of these services will be in conformance with existing rules and regulations and the facilities will be dedicated to the appropriate public agency or utility upon completion. Due to the anticipated pattern of diversified, individual ownership, the property owners' association will supervise the maintenance and upkeep of all individual sites in the Tigard Office Park. The public street facility ' • will be maintained by the responsible public agency after dedication of that facility to the public agency. 6. WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES; A. Sewer There are presen,fy two sanitary sewer connection points near the proposed project: one located on S. W. 72nd Avenue approximately 600 feet south from the southwest corner of the project and one approximately 400 feet east from the southeast corner of the project. both connection points are of adequate capacity to serve the needs of the proposed project. B. Storm Drainage" is The site presently slopes to the southwest, draining into the open ditch along S. W. 72nd Avenue. An on-site storm drainage system will be constructed in �r:.cordance with all local codes and ordinances, D. x ' . + 7. LIGHTING: 6. ! . Lighting for the public road will be provided in accordance with all local codes and ordinances and be integrated into a lighting program. ' i 8. WATER SUPPLY; ' A twelve inch water main is along S. W. 72nd Avenue, and a six inch main is along S. W. Varns Road. The twelve inch main is adequate to serve the need of the neighborhood and the proposed project. i 9, PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: Presently there is no public transportation serving the project site. The project is planned to include a bus turn-out lane for future use. 10. FIRE PROTECTION: The project will be planned in accordance with the requirements of the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District and the Fire Marshal Division of the Department of Commerce, State of Oregon. Fire flow at the twelve inch main along S, W. 72nd Avenue is 1,000 gallons per minute, adequate to serve the needs of fire fighting for the area. i r 11 . PROPOSED DESIGN .TEAM; 1 Campbell-Yost-Grube & Partners, Architecture and Planning, a Portland firm, are architectural and planning consultants for the proposed project. The team further includes a landscape architect and a civil engineer. 3: a • x • • • • 12. PROPOSED DEVIATIONS OR VARIANCES: 7. A. M-4 Zone (1) Lot R guirement (18.52.030) Code: (1) The minimum lot area shall be forty thousand square feet. (2) The minimum lot width shall be one hundred feet. Proposal: (1) The minimum lot area is 19,800 sq.ft. (2) The minimum lot width is 110 feet. (2) Setback Requirements (18.52.40) Code: (1) The frontyard setback shall be forty feet, except when across the street from a residential zone, a frontyard setback of fifty feet shall be required. ••;5 l (2) The sideyard setback shall be twenty feet. (3) The rearyard setback shall be 20 feet. (5) If parking is to be located within any required frontyard, the first twenty feet within the yard will be retained as landscaped area. Proposal: (1) The frontyard setback is 20 f?et for 2 story,and 15 feet for 1 story; the frontyard setback across the residential zone (S. W. 72nd Avenue) is 40 feet plus 20 feet widening of S. W. 72nd Avenue. (2) The sideyard setb'ick is 15 feet for 2 story buildings i 10 feet for 1 story and 5 feet for parking. (3) The rearyard setback is 25 feet for 2 story buildings 20 feet for 1 story buildings and 10 feet for parking. r.• (5) The frontyard for parking is 10 feet, no parking in the buffer along S. W. 72nd Avenue n p (3) Reasons Lot Size: The proposed office park subdivision will consist of 15 lots,. averaging one half acre, to meet a specific market demand in lot and office building sizes as stated in pars-j graph 36. Applicant's Market Analysis. f .. • 12. PROPOSED DEVIATIONS OR VARIANCES: (continued) 8. .; Lot Width: The development plan distributes all of the half acre lots along an internal public road. Within the covenance limitations the resulting average lot width of 135 feet is flexible to accommodate a variety of layouts for the office building range anticipated. Setback The covenance limitation of 60% for building-parking land coverage e g Require-- in conjunction with the maximum two-floor height limitation merits: will result ih office building volumes compatible with the residential area west of S. W. 72nd Avenue. The proposed setbacks are exceeding considerably those of a commercial- professional zone, they are established to assure a parklike character for the project and to maintain a high degree of existing vegetation. B. Subdivisions . l { (1) Grades and Curves (17.28„130) • Code: . . .centerline radii of curves shall not be less than one hundred feet on other streets. Proposal: , The radius of curves is 50 feet. 1 (2) Sidewalks (17.44.040) Code: Concrete sidewalks shall be installed along both sides of each street in accordance with standards adopted yp by the city. i . .. UUU Proposal:L No concrete sidewalks n order to obtain a maximum of landscaping in setbacks, right--of-ways and buffer areas. (3) Reasons Street The internal public road has four curves which form a square Curves: loop. The curves have 50 feet central radius sufficient to accommodate the turning radius of emergency vehicles and other vehicle requirements of the proposed development. Sidewalks: In the absence of public transportation, public sc.., ice- commercial establishments or anticipated interdependent office facilities, the installation of sidewalks is not warranted. An alternative paved pedestrian circulation system is provided to serve present and future needs of the inhabitants of the project. r, . .A1' ___ ., .. . . .. • . . . . . , . . . , . „. ... . .. • .. ,...• . . . (— 7 c . . ,. , . . ...,, IVED \+ ., . . ROBERT M. FLETCHER ,. JUL 't, 1975 1750 S.W.SKYLINE BLVD. - SUITE. 120 , I, • PORTLAND,OREGON 97221 TMIMMTelmwimm71 , . . , . . . . .i' 'V IF TIGARD . . . • 116* , . 101:1* July 12, 1976 . , . . . .. . . -, .., .• ... .. .t: , City of Tigard : . P. O. Box 23557 . . Tigard, Oregon 97223 , .. . • Attn: Richard Daniels, Associate Planner .: Gentlemen: • . . . . , . , .,• ZC5 File 76 Re: - ., .. . . This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of June 23, 1976. We are prepared to acknowledge receipt and acceptance of your . . letter with the following understanding. . , Based on the discussion and actions taken by the Planning Commission at the meeting on June 15, 1976, we will be submitting a list of ronditional uses which are to be permitted on the • ' . . . subject property. These uses are consistent with our proposed . . development and the underlying M-4 zone. Furthermore, it is , . . ' . understood that, as conditional uses, they will be subject to - .. approval by the Planning Commission as well as design review by . , . . an architectural committee to be established by the developer • and design review as established by the City of Tigard. , . , . , . . . We are prepared to proceed with the submission of the general , . development at the earliest possible date and are proceeding . . .. . • wtth preliminary engineering considerations for the project. . . . , An accepted copy of your letter of June 23 is enclosed herewith . . subject to the understanding set forth in this letter. , . . 4PLETCHER, N Etq' PARSONS by Robert M. Fletcher, partner RMF:rta • Enc. . , . . . „ -„. . .... „ ... ,..._ ,. .., . „.„ ..... „ .. .„ . , . ., . ... , .„„... . •• „„ .„. . . „. ,. .. ,..___. ...,, 4....•,,•,,,, ...,,4,..•.,,..... •', ' ' ' ,,,w,,. - '•,'.• •' ,' '"''',1W,',,,,/',• ,,,,,•",,,,,,,•,■•, .,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,,„,,,. # t 4I tGwb" CITY OF TIGARD P. 0, Box 23557 12420 s, W, Main Tigard, Oregon 97223 June 23, 176 Mr. Robert M. Fletcher 1750 S. W. Skyline Blvd. Suite 120 Portland, Oregon 97221 File: W. 5-76 Dear Mr. Fletcher: Please be advised that the Tigard Planning Commission at their regular meeting on June 15, 1976, approved your request for an amendment to a Planned Development for property located at the southeast corner of S.W. 72nd Avenue and S.W. Varns Road. This approval was granted sub- ject to the following conditions: 1. Lot size, right-of-way width, pavement width, setbacks, curve radii be noted code deviations. 2. Signing program, for entire park be submitted to the Design Review Board. 3. That an additional 20 feet of right-of-way on 72nd be dedicated, and the applicant file with the City Recorder a non-remonstrance agreement for full street improvements • to S.W. 72nd Street in accordance with Public Works Stan- dards. 4• Deed Covenants be executed restricting access from S.W. Varns and S.W. 72nd Avenue other than the main entrance. • , 5. The center line curve radii be no less than 50 feet. 6. The setback from S.W. 72nd be 40 feet with a 10 foot intrusion allowable for no more than 1/3 of the lot width, if no other feasible option is available. Use of this setback area is needed to site a proposed build and/or 4 parking area. 7. The emergency vehicle access would be provided as an addition to the footpath system or be constructed with page 2 six foot base rock overladen with sod and signed at both S.W. Varns and the interior road. 8. A street cross section be submitted for Engineering Depart- ' ment review prior to General Plan and Program Review. 9. The bus turnout Line be dedicated and improved as part of the S.W. 72nd L.1.D. 10. Standard wheelchair ramps be provided at the N.W. corner of Lot 12, S.W. and S.E. corner of Lot 13 and N.W. and N.E. corner of Lot 1, cross section of the ramps and path be subject to Engineering Department approval. 11. A path be provided along either the inside or outside of the interior road or internal to Lots 14 and 15 and provision for crossing the traffic island be shown. 12. A five foot utility easement be provided along all property I I, lines tml deeded. . 13. Access to Lots 2, 5, and 12 be combined with adjacent lots and access to Lot 9 be combined with Let 8. Access to Lots 14 and 15 be provided on the north and south respectively • and access to Lot 1 and 13 be from the internal road, not the entrance way. , 14. All utilities serving this site be underground. 15. Location and design of storm and sanitary sewer and water lines and drainage retention system be submitted to City Engineering Department and Washington County Public Works Department for approval prior to General Plan Review. 16. Lan aping plan for each parcel be reviewed by the Design Review Doard prior to issuance of building permit by city. , 17. Access street opening permit on S.W.; 72nd be acquired from • Washington County Public Works Departmentq 18. Road improvements and signing be constructed prior to issuance of building permits. 19. A street lighting plan, be submitted for City approval. • • • • page 3 20. All remaining aspects o2 tie development be constructed to applicable health, subdivision and zoning codes. • 21. All uses permitted outright in the CP Zone be permitted in the Planned Development. This amendment is to a Planned Development approved June 10, 10(4. Section 16.56.170 requires that "If substantial construction or development has not taken place within one year from the date of approval of the general develop- ment plan and program, the planning commission shall review the district at a public hearing to determine whether or not its continuation in whole or in part is in the public interest, and if found not to be, shall recommend to the city council that the planned development district on the property 'be removed. me city council, at the request of the applicant, may grant an extension of time if justifiable. " An extension was granted in September 15, 19/50 for a period of one year. Therefore, every effort should be made to secure General Plan and Program approval prior to September 15, 19Th. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call this office at b39-4171. Sincerely, i4 Richard Daniels Associate Planner RD:jh Note: The following acknowledgement must be received by the City of Tigard with: fourteen U.4) days of your receipt of this letter, iai1ure to do so may result in action by the City of Tigard. J. herOby acknowledge this letter documenting the action of the Tigard Planning uommission. i have received and read this letter and I agree to the decision here documented and to a4de,, y arm term and/or conditions attached. • gna ure 7 • cot Building Official Engineering Dept, MINUTES Tigard Planning Commission Meeting June 15, 1976 • 7:30 p.m. Twality Junior High School - Lecture Room 14650 S.W. 97th Avenue - Tigard, Oregon 1. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Chairman Popp. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: Goldbach, Krause, Moore, Nicoll, Phillips, Popp, Porter, Sakata, Tepedino. Staff: Daniels, Laws 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Goldbach motioned that approval of the 6/1/76 minutes be postponed, seconded by Tepedino, until the Commission had the opportunity to read the minutes. Unani- mously approved. 4. COMMUNICATIONS: a. A letter from the Beaverton School District requesting that they be involved in the review of Preliminary Plat proposal affecting school properties. b. A letter from Ed Hardt, Highway Division, stating that his department would not be able to respond for 90 to 120 days regarding the Smith-Greyhound proposal on Pacific Highway. o Tepedino questioned the response time from the State and further stated that the applicant was being prejudiced by the State action. o Porter stated that he was willing to hear this item prior to State response provided that the „epplicant submit all other necessary application requirements. o Phillips concurred with Porterls remarks. Dui to the additional items on the agenda, the Commissioners felt that any action on this matter should be deferred and heard at the end of the agenda. S. PUBLIC HEARINGS: t ZONh CHANGE /JC 5-.76 (Hanson-Fletcher-Parsons) . 0 4 -2- A request by Hanson-Fletcher-Parsons for an amendment to a Planned Development approved June 10, 1974, for property located at the S.E. corner of S.W. 72nd Avenue and S.W. Varns Rd. (Washington County Tax Map 251 1D, Tax Lot 900). (Tabled from May 4, 1976, PC Meeting) A. Staff Report: Read by Daniels o Krause requested that Staff give other permitted uses that would be allowed in a Commercial-Profes- sional Zone. B. Applicant Presentation: Robert Fletcher, one of the principals in the application, stated that the concept was not designed to restrict the uses in the proposed PD for office space only and felt that other uses per- mitted in the M-4 Zone would be compatible. Fletcher gave a verbal presentation of the submitted program narrative and stated that he favored an L.I.D. for S.W. 72nd Street rather than a half-street improve- ment. o Sakata asked the applicant to respond to Staff • Finding 23 pertaining to "illegal" Minor Land Parti- tion. o Krause stated that he was concerned with the "flex- , ibility" in the design concept, in that there could be 15 possible different designs on the individual buildings. o Fletcher stated that the architecture would be harmonipus and subject to their design review as well as the city's Design Review Board. o Krause stated that the smaller the lot the more loss of existing trees would occur in order to accommodate a structure. o Fletcher stated that they intended to preserve as many trees as possible on the individual site. O Ooldbach asked Staff for a clarification of this proposal versus the 1974 M-4 PD proposal and if the two were the same. . 0 -3- , o Staff stated that the original proposal was for office type uses only. o Hilton Smith (Real Estate Agent for applicant) stated that commercial professional uses were over saturated in this area already, i.e. Lincolnwood Properties, and did not want to be too restrictive in uses allowed in an M-4 Zone. C. Public Testimony: None • D. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Lot size* right-of-way width, pavement width, set- backs, curve radii be noted code deviations. 2. Signing program for entire park be submitted to the Design Review Board. 3. That an additional 20 feet of right-of-way on 72nd be dedicated, and the applicant file with the City Recorder a non-remonstrance agreement for full street improvements to S.W. 72nd Street in accordance • with Public Works Standards. • 4. Deed Covenants be executed restricting rccess from S.W. Yarns and S.W. 72nd Avenue. 5. The center line curve t . ;.ii be no less than 50 feet. 6. The setback from S.W. 72nd be 40 feet with a 10 foot intrusion allowable for no more than 1/3 of the lot width, if no other feasible option is available. Use ot this setback area is needed to site a proposed build and/or parking area. 7. The emergency vehicle access would be provided as an addition to the footpath system or be constructed with six foot base rock overladen with sod and signed at both S.W. Yarns and, the interior road. 8. A street cross section be submitted for Engineering Department review prior to General Plan and Program Review. 9. The bus turnout lane be dedicated and improved as part of the S.W. 72nd Ti -4- 10. Standard wheelchair ramps be provided at the N.W. corner of Lot 12, S.W. and S.E. corner of Lot 13 , and the N.W. and N.E. corner of Lot 1, cross sec- tion of the ramps and path be subject to Engineering Department approval. , 11. A path be provided along either the inside or out- side of the interior road or internal to Lots 14 and 15 and provision for crossing the traffic island be shown. 12. A five foot utility easement be provided along all property lines as deeded. 13. Access to Lots 2, 5, and 12 be combined with adja- cent lots and access to Lot 9 be combined with Lot 8. Access to Lots 14 and 15 be provided on the north and south respectively and access to Lot 1 and 13 be from the internal road, not the entrance way. 14. All utilities serving this site be underground. • 15. Location and design of storm and sanitary sewer and water lines and drainage retention system be sub- . mitted to City Engineering Department and Washington County Public Works Department for approval prior to General Plan Review. 16. Landscaping plan for each parcel be reviewed by the Design Review Board prior to issuance of building permit by City. 17. Access street opening permit on S.W. 72nd be acquired from Washington County Public Works Department. 18. Road improvements and signing be constructed prior • to issuance of building permits. 19. A street lighting plan be submitted for City approval. 20. All remaining aspects of the development be constructed to applicable health, subdivision and zoning codes. 21. All uses permitted outright in the CP Zone be per- mitted in the Planned Development. t. Rebuttal; Fletcher stated that he would not mind re- , stricting uses and would be agreeable to specifying specific uses within the PD, during General Plan and Progrnm Review. • 4 t # -5- F. Commission Discussion and Action: Popp stated that in order to provide as a safeguard in terms of compatibility with surrounding land uses, the types of uses within this proposed Planned Development should be restricted. o Krause stated that he concurred with Popp's remarks and that at the time of the General Plan approval the Commission could ask that architectural criteria for the buildings be established. Tepedino stated that he had difficulty with ”under- standing as to what denotes an office-related use” . Moore stated that he felt there are enough businesses allowable in the M-4 Zone that could locate in this site that would be aesthetically pleasing. o Krause asked the Staff if approval of the PD could be given and that uses other than office types were proposed that they would be subject to Commission action. Moore stated that it was difficult to specify a par- . ticular type of use. 'o Goldbach stated that the Commissioners should give approval for the M-4 PD for office use only and other 1 uses would be subject to conditional use action. o ' Porter stated that Staff's proposal for Commercial Professional permitted uses was a fair proposal and that compatible manufacturing could be permitted as a conditional use. Condition 8 under the Commercial- Profesional Zone, Conditional Uses, would afford the Planning Commissia tab opportunity to review -any proposals for light manufacturing. o Phillips stated that the buffer zone now existing around the site should be retained. o Nicoll* motioned to approve the M-4 Planned Develop- ment with Staff recommendations as amended. Seconded by Moore, o Motion by Goldbach, seconded by Krause that an addi- tional condition be added to the M-4 PD proposal creating Cond .tion #22 that architectural compatibility -6- for all buildings be defined before the General Plan is adopted. This motion was approved 5 to 4, yes - Goldbach, Krause, Nicoll, Sakata, Tepedino; no - Moore, Phillips, Popp, Porter. Motion by Sakata, seconded by Phillips that another additional condition, Condition #23 be added that a buffer zone be retained around the perimeter of the site. Motion failed 7 to 2; yes - Sakata, Phillips; no - Goldbach, Krause, Nicoll, Tepedino, Moore, Popp, Porter. Original motion was then approved unanimously as amended to include Conditions 1 through 22. 5.2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Cu 14-76 (John Smith - Greyhound) A request by John Smith to locate a Greyhound Bus Terminal in the C-3 Zone (General Commercial) on S.W. Pacific Hwy. in the vicinity of S.W. 79th Avenue. (Washington County Tax Map 151 36CD, Tax Lot 1900). As the applicant had not submitted all the required mater- ials and the letter from the Highway Deparment would not ( be ready for 90 to 120 days, this item was withdrawn from the agenda. 5.3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CU 17-76 (William Foster) A request by William Foster to operate a cabinet shop in an M-4 Zone (Industrial Park) at 9828 S.W. Tigard Avenue, (Tigard Industrial Park) (Washington County Tax Map 251 2DA, Tax lot 300). A. Staff Report: Read by Daniels B. Applicant Presentation: Bill Foster, the applicant, stated that the proposed site was the only one available in the area to perform the proposed use he was requesting. o Sakata asked the applicant as to the hours of operation. o The applicant stated that the hours of operation would be between 8 to 5 p.m. Monday through Saturday and no later than 9 p.m. in the evening, o Moore asked the applicant if he would be installing an exhaust fan. • 1 1 STAFF REPORT Tigard Planning mission June 15, 1976 Agenda Item 5. 1 DOCKET: ZONE CHANGE ZC 5-76 REQUEST: An amendment to an Industrial Park Planned Development approved June 10, 1974. LOCATION: Southeast corner of SW 72nd and SW Varns Road (Wash. Co, Tax Map 2S1 1D Tax Lot 500) APPLICANT: Hansen-Fletcher-Parsons BASIC FACTS: . 1 . The site is designated as "General Industrial" on the T C Plan and is zoned (M-4 PD) Industrial Park Planned Development 2. The site is presently in forest cover of mainly first and second growth douglas fir, oak, spruce, ash and alder trees with dense underbrush, ferns and moss. FINDINGS: 1 . The applicant has requested an amendment to an M-4 PD approved June 10, 1974. (Ordinance 74-28) 2, The initial approval was for a centrally located apartment-type office building 9,nd the following conditions were attached: (a) The property owner(s) shall dedicate to the public 10' of additional right-of-way parallel S.W. 72nd. l‘ve. and adjacent the subject site. (b) The property owner(s) shall construct a half street improve- ment, said improvement plans shall generally follow the recommendations of the applicantts submitted traffic circulation study, and shall be approved by the Wash. Co. Dept. of Public Works, said traffic circulation being contained • within Exhibit 'E' of Ordinance No. 74-28. (c) The property owner(s) shall agree to participate In a local improvement district for the purpose of improving S.W. Varns St. to City local street standards, said agreement shall be executed as a recordable convenant running with the land. (d) The storm drainage plan of the site shall be subject to the approval of the City of Tigard and the Wash. Co. Public Works Dept. (e) The property owner(s) shall submit for review and approval of the City Attorney, a draft of a Vroperty Owners • Association agreement to be used if bile ownership of the buildings is divided, said agreement to define the responsibil- ity for common area maintenance and to assure access to each A nage 2 2C Staff Report 6/15/76 Item 5. 1 (f) Prior to the issuance of building permits for each phase of construction, the property owner(s) shall submit to the City planning staff, for review and approval, a detailed landscape plan for each constrution phase. Said landscape plan shall describe the size, location, and spacing of plant material and how said plant materials are to be maintained. (g) The property owner(s) shall construct a sidewalk with storm drainage facilities necessary to enable construction of a sidewalk on the westerly side of SW 72nd Ave. from SW Varns S . to SW Cherry St. for the purpose of public trans- . , portation. Construction plans for said sidewalk and necessary storm drainage facilities shall be subject to the approval of the City and County Public Works departments. Said sidewalks and necessary storm drainage facilities shall be completed within six months from the date of issuance of any building permit for the subject project. (h) The property owner(s) shall provide curbs between all landscaped areas and parking lots. 3. This request for amendment was first heard by the Planning Commission May 4, 1976 and tabled until staff and the applicant had the op-ortunity to hold a conference to resolve the differences noted in the last meeting. 4. The surrounding and use is primarily undeveloped with an architects office . to the oast, single family homeson very large lots to the north and south and residences along SW 72nd to the west. The residential area on the west side of SW 72nd is recognized on the TCP and should be viewed as a long range commitment to its existence, 5. The proposed land use is consistent with the underlying M-4 zone but the proposed parcel size is twice that called for in that zone. M-4 requires a minimum 40,000 sq. ft. lot whereas the proposal envisions 20,000 sq. ft. lots. This code deviation has been noted in the narratives. The applicant has stated that they may combine some of the lots, This should be encouraged in that it will minimize the deviation from the code and lessen the intensity of the development. 6. Section 16. 36.050 of the TMC allows one free-standing directory sign at the entrance to the park from SW 72nd Ave. , a designated collector street in the Tigard Community Plan. The total allow- able sign surface is 250 sq, ft. , if multi-faced, with park tenants identified by no more that 4 sq. ft. Each tenant is allowed one free-standing sign not to exceed 8 ft. in height and 32 sq. ft. in surface. The proposed lotting pattern would allow 15 free-standing signs along the interior street, The number of free-standing signs appears to be excessive. The site plan shows two signs along SW 72nd and one at the entrance. The page 3 . '3C Staff Report • )/15/76 Item 5. 1 signing program should be reviewed by the Design Review Board. 7, Section 17.44 .020 of the TMC requires that streets within the subdivision*shall be graded constructed, re-constructed, surfaced or* repaired as determined by the Planning Commission with the advice of the Engineering Dept. If access to SW Yarns is to be restricted minimal improvements to the emergency access would be necessary. If not, a one-half street improvement should be provided. SW 72nd is designated as a collector on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and its use as such requires a half-street improvement at this time. A half-street improvement on 72nd from the NW corner of lot #12 to the SW corner of lot #2 has been recommended by the Engineering Dept. 8. The Tigard Municipal Code has been amended since the original Plan Development approval. SW 72nd is now designated as an arterial, rather than a collector as shown on the TCP, thus necessitating a wider right-of-way. SW 72nd presently has 40' right-of-way. The TCP calls for an 80' minimum, therefore a dedication of 20' along SW 72nd is necessary. 9. The park is to be serviced by an internal public street. Section 17. 28. 130 of the TMC requires the minimum centerline radii of curves to be 100 ft. The proposal shows four substandard curves of 1 40 ft. radius. The City Engineering Dept. and the Tualatin Rural I Fire Dept. have stated that the 35' road right-of-way and the 21 ' pavement width are adequate for a one way street if parking is prohibited and the curve radius is increased to 50' at centerline. In addition the Fire Marshall has asked that the street be dedicated to the public. 10. Section 18. 52.040 ( 1 ) of the TMC rPquires a fifty ft. setback if (10C•088 from a residential zone. ThelialL1 Communi4_21212 and the zoning map designate the arca west of SW 72nd as 'urban low density residential" and "single family residential" , respectively. The etback measurements are calculated from the property line. In this case the setback would be measured after the required 20' dedication on SW 72nd, not before, as proposed. Providing this much setback considerably reduces the amount of useable land on the lots fronting 72nd. In order to remedy this situation the setback can be accomplished by either joining lots 12 and 13 and 1 and 2, providing a shared parking facility, or allowing a partial intrusion into the area. The intent of providing a wide buffer between industrial and residential areas is being satisfied. 11 . No specifications on lighting were submitted. 12. The 15' emergency vehicular access shown on the site plan has been found necetsary to provide quicker access to the rear portion of the development. This access need not be fully improved but can be achieved by placing the normal mnount of baserock overladen with • sod, kept open and signed "emergency vehicles only" . *and existing streets which abut the subdivision page 4 'C Staff Report * 6/15/76 Item 5. 1 13. No street cross section is shown on the site plan. 14. Tri-met is in the planning stages of providing public transit service to SW 72nd when the area develops enough to warrant it. The site plan shows a bus turnout partially on this site. This area needs to be dedicated and fully improved at the time of the one-half street improvement. 15. A pedestrian path is shown to circle the entire site, No cross section has been submitted. All new corners with sidewalks are required to have wheel chair ramps. This needs to be shown for lots 12, 13 (twice) 1 (twice) 14 and 15. 16. A pedestrian pith is shown to the intersection of lots 1 , 13, 14, and 15 but no provision other than the roadway is made for getting pedestrians any further. Two options present themselves; 1 ) a path around lots 14 and 15; or 2) around the outside of the • curve of the roadway. The inside path would be shorter and less expensive to construct but would necessitate two street crossings by pedestrians. 17. section 17. 32.030 (A) of the TMC requires 101 minimum utility casements to be dedicated or provided for in deed restrictions along rear or side lot lines. None were shown on the preliminary proposal. Due to the stated intent of the applicant to combine some lots) 50 easements along all property lines would be adequate for the provision of utilities to all lots. 18. Section 17. 36.040 of the TMC states that double frontage and reversed frontage lots should be avoided except where essential. Lots 1 , 2, 8, 9, 10, 11 , 12, 13, 14, and 15 are all multiple frontage :lots and through access should be prohibited. Lots 14 and 15 should have access only from the north and south, • respectively so as tot\bhe parking lots from becoming a through drive. discourage 19. In order to limit the number of access points onto the interior • street, common access/egress points should be provided, especially lots 2, 5, 9, and 12 which, as drawn, are too narrow for the 30t dPivoway apron St from each property line. 20. Section 17,44.070 of the TMC requires that all utility lines shall be placed underground. Mention is made in the submitted material that this is the applicantts intention. The present overhead electric and telephone lines along SW 72nd should be placed undergroynd, if feasible, vs with the utilities within the sub- . 21 . Jection 17. 44 .050 requires installation of public sewer lines on each lot, if a sewer main is within 300 ft. of the subdivision. , ,Ar.t • • page 5 w , .°C Staff Report • ,/15/76 Item 5. 1 The closest sewer main is approxipately. 600 ft. south, near Sandburg, and could be difficult to connect with due to the relatively shallow depth of the main line at its northern ter- , minus. Section 17.44,050 provides the Commission with two options; 1 ) recommend construction of an assessment project to facilitate hooking up to the existing system; 2) approve an alternate disposal system that would meet County Dept. of Public Health and State Dept. of Environmental Quality Standards. The latter option should only be used where no alternative exists, 22. Section 17.44,060 requires that drainage of surface water shall , be provided as determined by the Planning Commission. The pro- , posal states that an on-site storm drainage system will be con- , structed in accordance with all local codes and ordinances. Since the storm drainage would necessarily be into state highway and/or county right-of-way, the State Highway Dept. will require an "outfall Drainagen permit and the County requires a permit for storm drainage into or onto County right-of-way. A drainage retention system should also be provided. 23. It has come to the staff' s attention this site has been partitioned in violation of the City' s Minor Land Partitioning Ordinance. This new parcel is .92 acre and in the south-west corner of the property, fronting SW 72nd. 24. The request is to permit professional office use. Staff finds this definition to be somewhat restrictive and the project may prove more economically viable if the range of uses permitted out right in the C-P one are included as permitted uses in the Planned Development. 0 STAFF RECOMMFNDATIONS: Staff recommends proval subject to the fol wing conditions; 1 . Lot size, right-of-way width, pavement width, setbacks, curve radii be noted as code deviations. - 2. Signing program for entire park be submitted to Design Review Board. \D 3. Additional 20' right-of-way on 72nd be dedicated and one-half s:breet improvement with storm and sanitary sewer, curbs and pathway rbe provided in the first phase of development. . 4. Deed convenants be executed restricting access from SW Varns and SW 72nd Ave. 5. The center line curve radii be no less that 50' . 2 6. The setback from SW 72nd be 40' with a 10 intrusion allowable for no more than 1/3rd of the lot width if no other feasible option 4 is available. Use of this setback area is needed to site a .27 proposed build end/or parking area. 1 page 6 Staff Report 15/76 Item 5. 1 7. The emergency vehicle access provided as an addition to the foot path system or be constructed with 6" baserock overladen with sod and signed at both SW Yarns and the interior road. 8. A street cross section be submitted for engineering department review prior to general plan and program review. 9. The bus turn out lane be dedicated and improved as part of the SW 72nd one-half street improvement. 10. Standard wheel chair ramps be provided at the NW corner of lot 12, SW and SE corners of lot 13 and the NW and NE corner of lot 1 , cross section of the ramps and path be subject to engineering dept, approval. 4 11 . A path be provided along either the inside or outside of the interior road or "internal to lots 14 and 15 and provision for crossing the traffic island be shown. 12. 51 utility easements be provided along all property lines. 13, Access to lots 2, 5 and 12 be combined with an adjacent lot and access to lot 9 be combined with lot 8. Access to lots 14 and 15 be provided on the N and S respectively and access to lots 1 and 13 be from the internal road, not the entrace way. 14. All utilities serving this site be underground. 15. Location and design of storm and sanitary sewer and water lines and drainage retention system be submitted to City Engineering Department and Wash. Co. Public Works Dept. for approval prior to General Plan review. 16. Landscaping plan for each parcel be reviewed by Design Review Board prior to issuance of pbuilding permit by City. ccess 17. / street opening permit onto SW 72nd be acquired from Wash. Co. Public Works Dept. 18. Road improvements and signing be constructed prior to issuance of building permits. 19. A street lighting plan be submitted for City approval. 20. All remaining aspects of the development be constructed according to applicable healtht subdivision and zoning codes. 21 . All uses permitted out-right in the C-P tone be permitted in the Plan Development. • F r :.: .._.._ ._.._. r, d AFFIDAVIT Ot- PUBLICATION _ Notice of Public Hearing ' .I STATE OF OREGON, Agenda • ss, Tigard Planning Commission ' • COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, June 15, 1976. -- 7:30 p.m., Twality Junior High School -- Lee- . ture Room I, J`o 5 IZ�Sh f r �,,._.._ _„ 14650 SW 97th Ave., Tigard, Oregon`. 5, PUBLIC HEARINGS: being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the publisher,._____ ___�,_�._ 5,1 ZONE CHANGE ZC 4-75 (Bunn) IA request IV* Kem Bunn for general .,� ' plan and program review of a proposed w.... of The Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined multi-family residential planned devel- opment in the vicinity of 109th and . by ORS 193.010 and 193.020, published at Tigat.d, in the aforesaid county and Canterbuiy*Ln. (Wash. Co. tax map . „ 2S1 TOAD, ta.x lot 500). state; that the legal notice, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was 5.2 ZONE CHANGE ZC 5-?6 (Ha_ n- sen-Fletcher-Parsons) ' • published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ._2..............._ successive and A request by Hansen-Fletcher-Par- .. s6ns for an amendment to a planned , consecutive weeks in the following issues ... development approved June 10, 1974, ' .__...w..._...,...w_.,,....._._........_.... .._.�._. ` for property located at the Southeast dc1 .�._. ..,��c,�. .Q���.�1' �... r corner of SW 72nd and SW'Darns Rd. ---._......__-�,.---.. _.�.....__-_,.._-...,,.-., --._._.----__.....� — (Wash. Co, tax map 2S1 1D• tax lot if 900). ....,...�...., _T',. .-- .._,... ....,..,6....",, ===:-- " (tabled from May 4, 1976, PC Meet- ,, (Si natur / in if g) . �,� 5,3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Subscribed and sworn to before me this .._.....,,_...._�.. . _ day of CUR 14-76 (John Smith/Greyhound),,,, �'" A request by John Smith to locate'a Greyhound' Bus terminal in the C-3 , J ie 19 76 zone (general commercial) on SW Pa- 4`'',; "--,_ cifie Hwy. in the vicinity of SW 79th • �\ tc Ave.(Wash.Co.tax map 1S1 36CD,tax u .,t-, 11 lot 1900 - .1,.j RNotpry Public of Oregon 5.4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CU 17-76 • I' A request'by William Poster to My commission expires ............... 'tnL-..4...L.... 1911 . operate a cabinet shop in a.M-4 zone 1 (Industrial Park) at 9828 SW Tigard Ave, (Tigard Industrial Park), Wash. Co. tax map 2S1 2BA, tax lot 300), 6, SUBDIVISION ' 6.1 MINOR LAND PARTITION MLP , 4-76 (Cacti) , A request by Jerry Cara to partition " a 1 acre parcel of land in an R-7 zone (single family residential) at 11680 SW 98th.(Tax map 151 35CD,tax lot 1700). • • (TT 2773 --- Publish June 8, 10, 1976) 1 . J . 1 • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard 1, Loreen R. Wilson , being first duly sworn, on oath depose and say: • That I am Secretary for the Planning Department for the City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served notice of hearing of the Tigard Planning Commission of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each o the following named persons on the day of • , l97 , by mailing to each of them at the a ris' shown 6E—The attached list (Marked Exhibit B) , said notice as hereto attached, depo, ited in the United States Mail on the day of , 197 (0 , postage prepaia. Cif f h Subscribed and sworn to before me on this I day of A . JUkh.; 9'16 1 0 0 in NOW-3 No'tary PiI6oiFi on My commission expires t /lb +4 . . . - - . ,. _ - .. ,. _ " < . -,-- -..-:. "'• _ • . • . .. . • . . . - . . . _ . . ..•= .. . . . . - .,. . ' • - ,. . • . • .. - . . . .... . . , . . , ..... . . CITY OF TIGARD ,.._ .7.1"...:-.7"D„, •,,,-----= .Box,225.77 , ......... ,- — ---- 2420 SWrklain- - ' c --- --- .. ,Ore223 = --,_,-,--7-I,--- II ...*4'%....",:f. F----7-Z,jlEp:11-. ----,..-.------- -, ,.. 4 t := ... .- t-- ix-. P ,---, ..--- Robert & -an Gage ------- - - - Rottte- 3, Bo 141. „)....„.....--- Newberg, Oreg. 97132 ---- ... - - . CIF ti ,:`• N ri ''.. .- ,`.. -." . . .-• • • -- - • •- - - - . - , 5-rfiffFir-b- /1 ci • tr • ti" PLANNING COMMISSION SUBMISSION OF •.•^... PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRe/GRAM FOR VARNS PARK • A COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (o r,4)' CD S. W. 72nd Avenue & Varns Road ',*i•• Tigard, Oregon , • i CAMPBELL,YOST.,GRUBE & PARTNERS ARCHITECTURE PLANNING • • , . , •.• • 1 PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT P LAN AND PROGRAM FOR A COMMERCIAL PARK SUBDIVISION AS A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT S . W. 72nd Avenue & Varns Rod [ Tigard, Oregon May 25, 1976 • 1 CAMPBELL-YOST-GRUBE & PARTNERS ARCHITECTURE - PLANNING 2040 S. W. Jefferson Street Oreon 97201 • • [1/ • • INDEX TITLE PAGE 1 . SITE DESCRIPTION 1 2. PLANNING CONCEPT 1 thru 3 3. APPLICANT'S MARKET ANALYSIS 4 4. PROPOSED OWNERSHIP PATTERN 4 • • • 5. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROPOSAL 4 6. WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES 4 7. LIGHTING 5 8. WATER SUPPLY 5 9. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 5 • 10. FIRE PROTECTION 5 ; • 11 . PROPOSED DESIGN TFAM 5 12. PROPOSED DEVIATIONS OR VARIANCES 6 fhru 7 13. EXHIBITS 1 t r, `, . • r t 1 . SiTE DESCRIPTION: 1 . $: The site is a 9.36 acre forested parcel of land, approximately square, located r, • , adjacent to the intersection of S. W. 72nd Avenue and S. W. Varns Road. ., B S. \AI 72nd Avenue adjoins the property to the west and S. W. Varns Road „ adjoins the r roperty to the north. The land is gently sloping to tie southwest, naturally draining in that direction to S. W. 72nd Avenue. The site vegetation generally consists of first and second growth Douglas Fir trees, large Oak trees, scrub Oak trees, Spruce trees, large Oregon Ash trees scrub Alder trees and P g , Vine Maples. The forest floor is covered with dense underbrush, ferns and moss. 2. PLANNING CONCEPT: h The objective of the owner and design team is to develop a viable commercial project which preserves the natural characteristics of the site to the largest P J P possible extent and is compatible in scale and use to the surrounding neighborhood. �tr,.�7q The proposed development will consist of a subdivision for a commercial offiee d p 'RR1 park with related uses in accordance with M4 zoning, , i Listed below are methods which the owner and design team will utilize to achieve r their ob`J ective. By widehina floe right�of-Nay of S. W. 72nd Avenue by 10 feet and by providing a bus turn-out lane as shown on the preliminary development plan. By providing a 40 foot landsca ed buffer along S. W. 72nd Avenue and a 1.522ollumelsapped buffer a ong t e remaining three sides, including a pedestrian walk and jogging path around existing tree locations. . .0,-) By providing an internal public road of 20 feet with a x- '. =fir• 35 feet and additional 15 foot landscaped set-back buffers on both sides. By introducing a covenance of design criteria for all lots of the subdivision 1 as follows: A. Land Coverage 1 Land Area (9.36 acres) 407,720 sat*. Less 10' widening of S.W. 72nd Avenue 6,370 s.f. Subdivision Excluding Road 355,400 s.f. X00% M ' .y i , i yy rW t.• 2. PL ANNINU CONCEPT: (continued) Max. Parking & Building Area 213,240 s.f. = 60% Landscaped Area 142,160 s.f. = 40% B. Lot Coverage • Building & Parking: Max. building and parkin, no o exceed 60°l0 of lot area. Landscaping: Min. landscaping 40% of lot area. C. Setback Requirements Building: Frontyard 20 feet 2 story 15 ''eet 1 story Side and 15 feet 2 story fort' 10 feet 1 story Backyard 25 feet 2 story 20 feet 2 story • Parking; Frontyard 10 feet Sideyard 5 feet Backyard 10 feet D. Building Height � tyg eight • i Not to exceed a height of two floors or 35 feet except as provided under the conditional use provisions of the M4 zone. E. Building Exterior Walls: To be in wood finish as shingles, siding, board and batten, plywood. TO be in concrete with formliner or sandblasted finish. Colors to be tpecifted. Roofs: Flat or sloped with minimum angle to be specified. Signing: A signing program will be developed to integrate all individual building identification. • Size and location of directory sighs at access points to be specified. Lighting: A street and exterior site lighting program will be developed to integrate project lighting. . 4. ..H. au∎......_..�. I t t 2. PLANNING G. ,,NCEPT: (continued) �r _ 1 F. Traffic & Vehicular Circulation Vehicular circulation enters and exits the project from S. W. 72nd I Avenue at the Fir Street alignment, loops internally through the project in a 20' wide one .- system serving all sites. a. It is anticipated there will be no external access to any site from � 1'��'"C S. W. 72nd or S. W. Varnes Road. An unpaved emergency vehicle access to the internal traffic loop system ._. will be F rovided by easement from S . W. Varnes either within setback areas between building sites or by connnection with a developed parking area. G, Pedestrian Circulation i The project development will serve pedestrians by providing access to individual buildings within the site by means of a 4' wid yvpd walk. I The walk will meander around the periphery of the site within the exterior landscaped buffer strip. The walk will provide pedestrian access from the future bus stop to all sites. H. Utilities `Ail utility systems will be constructed underground within an 8 foot wide easement which will be located within the internal vehicular right-of-way. . I. I. LandscaEg 1 Existing landscaping features to be preserved and to be supplemented with new plant material as specified. Parking areas to be designed to preserve maximum number of existing trees by providing landscaped Iislands around existing trees where possible. Existing trees larger than b" 0 cannot be removed without permission. J. Review All proposed site planning, building and landscaping lighting and sigh 1 features have to be submitted to a deli n rev i t b l ishe dby the owners for approval of compliance with the covenance. . _ ,,.00r ..�, L I I .....e..........mio......J , it I 3. APPLICANT'S MARKET ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED USE: 4. , 1 , Owner's survey of the market for economical (less than one acre) sites for the construction of smaller buildings for office and associated uses, reveals a lack t, of inventory of readily buildable sites of this size. The g neatest demand in the Tigard area is for office and associated use space developed by corporations and other businesses or .-ir own use, not for genera occupancy. Iv�ost available �. sites are over 1 .5 acres in size with a price range of $3.00 to $4.00 per square foot, The economics of sites with values of over $750,000 for buildings of less than 15,000 square feet in floor area are prohibitive. The demand for owner occupied office buildings in the size range of 4,000 to 10,000 square feet is strong. The owners plan to provide one-half acre sites meets the demand for this type, of space with a quality environment at reasonable costs per site of $50,000 fi [ to $75,000. ) 4. PROPOSED OWNERSHIP PATTERN: The owners of the property for the proposed Tigard Office Park intend to sell fully developed sites for the construction of smaller buildings for office and associated uses. These would be sold on a "fee simple" basis. A ro erty owners' association will be formed which will enforce the design, construction aw tenance s andards of all individual properties and assure their conformance to the restrictive covenants established in the Tigard Office Park. g 5. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROPOSAL: i Sewer, water, road, electrical, telephone and as services will be maintained by the public agency or private utility responsible for providing said services.Construction of these services will be in conformance with existing rules and regulations and the facilities will be dedicated to the appropriate public agency or utility upon completion. Due to the anticipated pattern of diversified, individual Iownership, the property owners' association will supervise the maintenance and upkeep of all individual sites in the Tigard Office Park. The public street facility , i will be maintained by the responsible public agency after dedication of that facility to the public agency. 6, WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES: A. Sewer There are presently two sanitary sewer connection points near the proposed • projects one located on S. W. 72nd Avenue approximately 600 feet south from the southwest corner of the project and one approximately 400 feet east 1 from the southeast corner of the project. both connection points are of adequate P � capacity to serve the needs of the proposed project. b. Storm Drainage 1. , ' i The site presently slopes to the southwest, draining into the open ditch along S S. W. 72nd Avenue. An on-site storm drainage system will be constructed r n m ` accordance with all focal co w an rnances.• . q 0 d 7. LIGHTING: 5, . i . Lighting for the p f th public road will be provided in accordance with all local codes and ordinances and be integrated into a lighting program„ . ., i $, WATER SUPPLY: R I A twelve inch water main is along S. W. 72nd Avenue, and a six inch main is along S. W. Varns Road. The twelve inch main is adequate to serve the need of the neighborhood and the proposed project. • 1 9. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: Presently there is no public transportation serving the project site. The project is planned to include a bus turn-out lane for future use. ■ { 10. FIRE PROTECTION: I The project will be planned in accordance with the requirements of the Tualatin 1 Rural Fire Protection District and the Fire Marshal Division of the Department a , ; L of Commerce, State of Oregon. Fire flow at the twelve inch main along S. W. 72nd Avenue is 1,000 gallons per minute, adequate to serve the needs of fire fighting . for the area. l I 11 . PROPOSED DESIGN TEAM: iCampbell-Yost--Grube & Partners, Architecture and Planning, a Portland firm,, are architectural and planning consultants for the proposed project. The team j further includes a landscape architect and a civil engineer. i l 1 . i .... .1 1 ti o If ' !12. PROPOSED DEvIATIONS OR VARIANCES: 6. A. -M 4 Zone (1) Lot Requirement (18.52.030) 1 . Code: (1) The minimum lot area shall be forty thousand 1 1 Al If 4-14/1 ' square feet. (2) The minimum lot width shad be one hundred feet. Proposal: (1) The minimum lot area is 19,800 sq.ft. (2) The minimum lot width is 110 feet. , i (2) Setback Requirements (18.52.40) , Code: (1) The frontyard setback shall be forty feet, except e r when across the street from a residential zone, , a frontyard setback of fifty feet shall be required. (2) The sideyard setback shall be twenty feet. I (3) The rearyard setback shall be 20 feet. ii (5) If parking is to be located within any required li frontyard, the first twenty feet within the yard will be retained as landscaped areo. �� c for 2 stor and 15 feet 1 Proposal: (1) The frontyard setback is 20 Feet r y, for 1 story; the frontyard setback across the residential ' zone (S. W. 72nd Avenue) is 40 fcet,, l us 10 feet widening of S. W. 72nd Avenue. 1 1 (2) The sideyard setback is 15 feet for 2 story buildings , 10 feet for, 1 story and or . . (3) The rearyard setback is a feet for 2 story buildings , 20 feet for 1 story buildings unc 10 ft:ett for parking. - i (5) The frontyard for parking is lb feet, no parking in the buffer alon g S. W. 72nd Avenue. 1 (3) Reasons Lot Size: The proposed office park subdivision will consist of 15 ' lots", averaging one half acre, to meet a specific market demand in lot and office building sizes as stated in para- graph 3, Applicant's Market Analysis. 1 .. i A, r 1• q i 12. PROPOSED DEVIATIONS OR VARIANCES: (continued) 7. Lot Width: The development plan distributes all of the half acre loft along an internal public road. Within the covenance limitations the resulting average lot width of 135 feet is flexible to accommodate a variety of layouts for the office building range anticipated. Setback The covenance limitation of 60% for building-parking land coverage Require- in conjunction with the maximum two-floor height limitation ments: will result in office building volumes compatible with the residential area west of S. W. 72nd Avenue. The proposed setbacks are exceeding considerably those of a commercial- professional zone, the;.' are established to assure a parklike character for the project and to maintain a high degree of p existing vegetation. B. Subdivisions (1) Grades and Curves (17.28.130) Code: . . .centerline radii of curves shall not be less than one hundred feet on other streets. Proposal: The radius of curves is 30 feet internal and 50 feet external. 'Y. (2) Sidewalks (11.44.040) Code: Concrete sidewalks shall be installed along both sides of each street in accordance with standards adopted • by the city. ,erg J'r 11 � r Proposal: No concrete sidewalks in order to obtain a maximum of landscaping in setbacks, right-of-ways and buffer areas. (3) Reasons Street The internal public road has four curves which form a square Curves: loop. The curves have 30' internal and 50' external radii sufficient to accomrodate the turning radius of emergency � a vehicles and other vehicle requirements of the proposed development, Sidewalks: In the absence of public transportation, public service- commercial establishments or anticipated interdependent office facilities, the installation of sidewalks is not warranted. An alternative paved pedestrian circulation system is provided to serve present and future needs of the inhabitants of the project. a I • May 12, 176 Mr. Robert M, Fletcher Fletcher, Hansen 84 Parsons 1750 S. W. Skyline Blvd. ' . Suite 120 Portland, Oregon 97221 f / f Reference: File No. ZC 5-76 Dear Mr1 Pletcher: Please be advised that the Tigard Planning Commission, at their regular meeting of May 4, 1976, considered your request for an amendment to a planned development approval for property located at the southeast corner of SW 72nd and SW Varna. Rdo Your request was tabled to allow time for you to schedule a meeting with the Citylniaallhg Staff to discuss any conflicts. a If you need additional assistance or information, please do not J.. hesitate to call this office at 639-4171. Sincerely, Richard Bolen Planning Director RB:pt lr } A . 1 oto • o • • • 5.2 ZONE C N L g,d 5276• Hansen-Fl etcher Parsons pus_ • • • • • • • J. • • A • • _tt page 2 PC MiLutes 5/4/76 „ • A request by Hansen-Fletcher-Parsons for an amendment to a planned development approved 1/10/74, for property located at the southeast corner of SW 72nd and SW Varns Rd. (Wash. Co. tax tap 2S1 1D, tax lot 900) . A. Staff Report: read by Bolen. B. Applicant's Presentation: o Mr. Robert Fletcher, applicant, stated that the need for the change from the originally approved plan is necessitated by a change in the market, which is not presently conduci-re to larger office ' buildings. The present market is favorable for smaller, owner-occupied office buildings. He also stated that limiting the building coverage • to 40% would leave adequate open space and land- scaping around the buildings much in excess of what is required in M-4 zoning. o Mr. Hilton Smith, economist for the applicant, stated that a good example of the lack of a good market for large office buildings can be reflected in Lincolnwood Office Building which exhibits a high vacancy rate. o Moore asked about what the intention was in regard to the land-locked parcel labeled as lot 15. o Fletcher responded they did not pesently contem- .. plate the southerly extension of the interior street, but were leaving that option open should it present itself. o Goldbach stated that the preliminary concept was sound, and that a staff/applicant conference would be in order to iron out the dimensional differences which were pointed out in the staff report. • o Bolen stated that when Smith and Hansen first con- • tacted him about the development of the property • or about revising the general development plan, he informed, them that they had a unique piece of property in this part of the City and that it 4 should be developed tt. take advantage of those on site amenities. o Barry Rand, representative of Campbell-Yost and arube, consulting architects for the project, stated that the first alternative proved to be page 3 PC Minutes 5/4/76 uneconomic and that they are willing to work with staff to settle the dimensional problems. There being no further public testimony, the public . Meeting was closed. E. Commission Discussion and Action o Porter stated that the concept, as presented by the applicant, conforms to the Comprehensive Plan; that the market has changed in regard to office space; and that the presehted development concept fulfills a community need for office qpace in the Tigard area. o Goldbach questioned whether the property could be used as M-4. o Bolen responded that the only use that could be made of that property is as per the Planned Develop- ment agreement. 4 ' o Porter questioned what the previous zoning was. 0. o Bolen responded that the parcel was previously zoned R-7 and if the Planning Commission finds that 1 this PD cannot be initiated within a year, then they may initiate rezoning proceedings to revert that zoning to R-7. . o Goldbaoh stated that the concept was OK and the details needed to be worked out and urged a staff/ applicant conference. o Nicoll stated that he also felt the concept was sound. o Coldbach moved and Sakata seconded to table the re- , quest until after an applicant/staff meeting and the applicant is willing to reappear with the request. o Motion approved by unanimous voice vote. 5.3 VARIANCE V 4-76 (Charles McClure) A requet by Charles McClure for a variance to the side- . yard setback requirements in a C-3M (general commercial • Main St. ) zone on a parcel of land at 9250 SW Tigard St. (Wash. Co. tax map 251 8AB, tax lot 3400) . Nicoll abstained from hearing the matter. . * ,YM . , ■ , <1 .. — -. a .. ,.. ,ti. /./", 1 STAFF REPORT Tigard Planning Coiwnisston . 11/4. May 4, 1976 - 7: 0 p.m. 11 . . ( Docket ZC 5-76 - 'tom 5.0, ; , . (A resubmission of 7,C 2.-74) ; . Request: . An amendment to a 9.36 acre commercial planned - development, approved June 10, 1974. . . Location: Southeast corner of SW 72nd and SW Varns Rd. (Wash. . Co. tax map 2S1 1D, tax lot 900) . Applicant: Hansen-Fletcher-Parsons . FINDTNGS 1 , 1. The applican.ts have requested an amendment to a planned develop- . . ment approved June 10, 1974, by Ordinance 74-28 for tax lot 900, Wash. Co. tax map 2S1 1D. . . . 2. The site is presently in forest cover of mainly first and second , growth Douglas Fir, oak, spruce, ash and alder trees with dense I * underbrush, ferns and moss. . 3. Ordinance No. 74-28 approved an M-4 - P.D. as shown on Lhe . • general development plan (will be available for exhibit) with ' the following condition : tl of, ( "(a) The property ovoner(s) shall dedtcate to the public 10 ft. of additional right-of-way parallel S. W. 72nd Avenue . and adjacent the silbject s ite. " . t (b) The property owner(s) shall construct a half street improvement, said improvement proveent plans shall generally follow the recommendations of the applicant' s submitted traffic circulation ' stIldy, and shall be n.pproved by the Washington County Department o: Public Works, said L.,.affic circulation being contnined within w,xhibit '3 'of Ovdjnnnce No. 7/1-28. It(c) The property owner(s) shall aree to partic!pate in a local Iloprovement district for the purpose of improving S. W. A yarns St. Lo City local street stanclards, said agreement shall . be executed 1-18 a recordable covenant running with the land. A , (d) The storm dvalna8e plan of the site shall be subject 1 ; to the approval of the C14 of Tigard and the Washington County i Public Works Departinunts. (u) The prupurLy ow000(s) shall submit for review and approval, of Lilo City ALLovouy, a draft of a Property Owners Association a8reumunt to be used If the ownership of the build- Inbt.3 is divided, said mroumont to define the responsibility A for c..-mmon area maintenance and to assure access to each building. • pas() 2 PC Staff Ilep , Item 5.A. 5/4/76 ( II (f) Prior to the issuance of building permits for each phase of construction, the property owner(s) shall submit to the City planning staff, for review and approval, a detailed landscape plan for each construction phase. Said landscape plan shall describe the size, location, and spacing of plant materials . and how said plant materials are to be maintained. (g) The property owner(s) shall construct a sidewalk with storm drainage facilities necessary to enable construction of a sidewalk on the westerly side of SW 72nd Avenue from SW Varns St. to SW Cherry St. for the purpose of public trans- . portation. Construction plans for said sidewalk and necessary storm drainage facilities shall be subject to the approval of • the City and County Public Works departments. Said sidewalks and necessary storm drainage facilities shall be completed within six months from the date of issuance of any building per- mit for the subject project. (h) The property owner(s) shall provide curbs between all landscaped areas and parking lots. " 4. Summarizing Section 18.56.010 of the Tigard Municipal Code, the purpose of nye plmined development district is to allow desien flexibility to accentuate and enhance the unique amenities 4 of a particular site, while at the same time ach4eving economies in land development, maintenance and utilities systems. It is questionable whether this concept goes much beyond the develop- . ment of a standard business subdivision. No attempt to into- Grate the comon Alnctions of the individual uses has been por- .'' trayed, nor to link the entire development around a central place or feature. The previously-approved Planned Development provided a park-like setting (slightly over 1 acre) which the build'ings wore grouped around. The now proposal could result In total builx3:tng Cloor area of 107,320 sq, EL. , if all buildings are single story, or 214, 653 sq. ft. , if all the buildings are two story, rabher than the origtnal 104,600 8q, ft. The land coverage would increase from 64,000 sq. :rt. to 1.(Y7, 329 sq, ft. nuilding land coverage has increased from 15.7% of the total site area to .3026. The landscaped area has decreased from 45% • Lo 409 . The amount of parking space has been reduced by 10% over the original plan. Staff would also like to know the total. Tiumbor of spaces proposed in the amended plan. While t1Laff realizes that the type of commercial development • being proposed must, of necessity, use more land area, the proposed scheme does not produce the amenity found in the ovigtnial plrin, nor does it sufficiently capitalize upon the uque setting that con,..4isLs of this site. 5. The request Car the chane addressed all plan and program elements uxcept the "gum..ral tNetable of dt..,velopment", • • Pt::;e 3 PC Staff Ruport Item 5.41, 5/4/76 6. The proposed land use is consistent with the underlying M-4 zone, but the density significantly exceeds that callod for in . the zone. M-4 requires a minimum 40,000 sq. ft./lot, whereas the proposal specifies 19, 628 sq. ft. 7. Section 16.36.050 of the TMC allows one free-standing directory sign at the entrance to the park from SW 72nd Ave. , a desig. 4,ted • collector street in the Tigard Community Plan. The total allow- able sign surface is 250 sq. ft. , if multi-faced, with park tenants identified by no more than 4 sq. ft. Each tenant is allowed one free-standing sign not to exceed 8 ft. in height and 32 sq. ft. in surface. The proposed lotting pattern would allow 13 free-standing signs along the interior street. The number of free-standing signs appears to be excessive and should either be subject to review by the Design Review Board or prohibited in lieu of wall mounted signs. I 8. The park is to be serviced by an internal pub.l.ic street. Section 1 17.28.130 of the TMC requires the minimum centerline radii of , curves to be 100 ft. The proposal shows three 6ubstandard curves of 35 ft. The City Engineering Dept. has stated that the pro- • , posed aliipment is unacceptable as presented. ' 9. Section 18.52.040 (1) of the TMC requires a fifty ft. setback from a residential zone. The Tiord Community_ Pllan and the zoning map desit!;nate the area west7f-W 72nd as "-arban low density residential" and usingle faAay resiclential", respectively. , r The setback measurem&QTs are calculated from the property line. Tn this case the setback would be Pcasured after the roquired 10 ' dedication on SW 72m, not before. as proposed. J)ue to 1, the long range commitment in the 'rid C000unitz Plan to maintwain Lilts residential area the 50 ft. feciUirbeii,t' 6f Lfie Trndrirlying M-4 zone should be mantained. 10. No specifications on libliting wore submitted. 11. Section 17.28.040 of the TMC requires that the minimum right-of- way width for busiDoss and industvial streets be 60 with 44' (ye pawmenb width. Yhe proposal shows a50 ' right-of-way with t a 34, payment width. Considering the number and :frequency of volticlos associated with the LhirLoon interior offices, the minimums addressed n the TMC should either be adhered to or an-strcut parking should be rooLrloted, If on-street parking is rusUricteq a 36' pd.ved width is a possibility, 12. uction 17,32,030 (A) of the TMC requires 10 ' minimum utilily easements to be dedicaLed or prov!ded for in deed residr3cLions nlong roar or side lot lines, None were shown on the pre- . liminy proposal. IMEMMIMMWAMMUNIMMOAMMIUMMIE . , . A 4:: N :li 0 1 A4 - . 0 . ' . pme 4 PC Start Repo. Item 5,P,-. 5/4/76 , k . ■ &■.' " M - 13. section 17.:>6.040 of the TMC states that double frontage and reversed frontage lots should be avoidod except where essential. Lot 11 ts a multiple frontage lot and through access should be prohibited. 0 14. section :1/.44.020 of the TMC requires that stroets within the subdivision, and existing streets which abut the subdivision, shall be graded, constructod, reconstructed, surfaced or ropairod as dotxrixiined by the Planning Commission with the advice of the F City Engineer. Their recommondation is to consider SW Varns as a commercial street and require additional right-of-way dedication to increase its width to 60 ' . SW Varns Is essentially unimproved ../.. ' and presents the options of °melting a L.I.D. on the entire length of it or including its improvement from the southeast q,,,. corner of lot 11 to SW 72nd as part of this application. A half street improvement on SW 72nd from the southern corner of , ''', lot 4 to the intersection with SW Varns has boon recommended by the engineering department. ., i:t. 15. Section 17.44.050 requires installation of public sewer lines T on each 1 if a sower main is within 300 ft. of the subdivision, The closest sewer main i s approximately 600 ft. south, near - 't Sandburg, and could be di:Moult to connect with due to the , relatively shallow depth of the main line at Its northern ter- v minus, Soc Lion 17./14.050 provides the Commission with two X options, (1) recommend construction of an assessment project to facilitate jlooking up to the existing system; (2) approve an alternate disposal syAtem that would meet County Dopt. of Pub !: !,! lic Health and State Department of 141nvironmenta1. Quality Standards. „ 1 16. Section 17.44. 060 requires that drainage o surface water s1al1 „ be proviOed ns determinod by tho Plnnaing Commission. The pro- posal states that an on-site storm drainage ' ystum will be con- . stfuctod in accordance with ail local codes and ordinances. N, wi. Since the storm drainage would neGessavily be into s Late highway and/or county right-of-way, the Stab() Highway Oupb. will require an "outfall drainage" permit and the County roqutres a permit - 6 1 Por storm drainage into or ()t1 lo County right-of-way. 4: 17. Acoss onto SW '(2nd Prom lot / requires a County access permit, , as does the now inLorior sLreet. An alternative to providing w1 access directly onto the collector street would be to croabe a common access point for lets 3 and 4 onto the now roadway along the cot lino of lot 3. ...., No distance was even from Uhe Intersection of SW 72nd and SW Varns. A minimum of 100t oast of Om SW 72nd fight-of-way igiould .'A be required so ns to provide a safe and adequate access point, ! This leot minimum should also be maintained Tor access to lotS vv.6' 2 FInd 3. Nw. . , _.: iA..„..., , ... ._ q .3 ; ‘ . * W . ,4 r ;e 5 AT PC Staff Rep64 ; • 5/4/76 , Item 5.X .,,, ?:, r, !4 4 . , . . v. AO 19. In order to limit the number of access points onto the interior 4 street, common access/egress points should be provided. V 20. Access On the seutheast .portion of lot 11 requires a state 1, 4 . highway dept. access permit. The engineering dept. recommends 4:, that access to lots 11, 12$ 13, 14 and 15 be permitted only - . from the interior strodt. - , V 21, It appears from the proposed plot map that space is being reserved between lots 15 and 10 for an extension of the interior , M street to the south property line, if this is the intent, adequate right-of-way for a 201 radius should be provided in ,..„ the northeast corner of lot 10. ..", . 4 , , . 22. Section 17.44,070 of the TMC requires that all utility lines sha4 be placed underground. No mention was made in the sub- mitted material that this is the applicantls intention. 'tie present overhead electric and telephone linos along SW 72nd shou3d be placed underground, it feasible, as with the utilities within the subdivision. • ,. . 23. The proposal shows a bus turn-out lane on SW 72nd. The specific location shown may rOstrict southern visibility when pulling out of the new street. Consideration should be given to locating , , it flypther south or at a point centering on the common boundary line between lots 1 and 2. STADT BECOMENOATION . . Staff roe rejection of this preliminary concept. 4J * :,;::-;■ . .r . 44'r e , , .i, ,. . J:, 1 ( 6 !As MOM ; S. } ,ir uq�kt ww.a..,...ww,...,.u ,.. .w,m+..,.+++.w.ww+...+r...m..ue.....a.k.+...»..wrr J • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION .: `'` STATE OF OREGON, NOTICE, Ol~ PUBLIC HEARING .+ ± � COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ss. ..• ' A.GENDA - • '. ,' '`` • 'Tigard Planning Commission ' t4:Y, - May 4, 1976 --- 7.'�0 p.m, ,u` • Twality Jr. High School Lecture ,, ' I, ....,....,, .. ..,.., Jo$e11L S chafer ...... ...............,, A Root • . Y 14650 SW 97th Ave:, Tiga►u, Oregon :: being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the publisher ..............�, r.C'.iPUS, :I iEARINC.cS; xi,'. i " N A) crE 7�(Roger-il� , " to O l 6snoghue) A're4ltest by Roberta,"; .... ............... of The Tigard Thnes, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined w. 3 r •:; O Donoghue for a zoding'rnap,Ap lend. '' by ORS 193,010 and 193.020, tent to zone arcel jof land'at 7310;. a,_ published at Tigard, in the aforesaid County and 5W Spruce, pr pt ntly honed county r �'`' R[.1.4(urban residential) to R„7(single, ";,;. state that the legal notice, a ,printed copy of which as hereto annexed, was ' family residential),(Wash.Co,tax map; 1S1 MAC, tai lot 3700). - ,J I', � successive 5.2 Ze t C CHANGE 4 75 enea I�', ,,� published in the entire issue of said newspaper for .....� and �''� ':�`: A request bar .Terry,Bonn for generai� i Consecutive weeks in the following issues .. ' plan and program review of a proposcd;t ,,,,, ..._....» multi family. (88 unit) r�;sidientaal; {„ : ” . ................�.... : :? 1. .... .A _.. c� =. _�C planned development in the vicinity of i s�.. .........� ...,.,w....M.. 109th and Canterbury Lane.(Wash,Co.' + tax wrap 151 34F, tax lot 500). .�� ... ............. . '�'.Z ) „„ 1 `f3 ..._.........., 5,3 ZONE CHANGE ZC 3,46 g3elati.f r (Sig attire) ich) A request by Roger �13elanrch for ;..1,\ a general plan,and program review of? .........,,.. day of . opment in the vicinity of 121st 122nd ; Subscribed and shorn to before me this 29 to a proposed P ,t' and Scholls Ferry lid. (Wash. Co, tax ;, ..._... April. , ......... 6 map 151 341.3,.'tax lot 500) •�; 19�. 5.4 ZONE CHANGE ZC 5»76 Wan— .: .......,..... . 'r ! %°� .. '``G�. .��.�_, b� arisen, ''e'c er.-arsons for art k 1 �.�' w' ” ,. amendment'to a planned developmentz 1 , / Notary Pt bile of Oregon. ... approved June 10,1974,for property lo.'?' ,/' a cated at the Southeast corner of SW t ' A';; My commission expires ..,. . , ,.,... .11 . . is., u�. nwp and SW Yarns ltd.(Wash,Co.tax„, ? , map 2S1 1U, tax lot 900); ;;u'' .:. _.,. ...,.. � '- ..�.....�� ' 5,5 VARIANCE `V 4-76 (Charles Mc-,, ;: r (lure) A request by Charles McClure`� for a variance to the front,yard setback`f' r requirements in a C:*3M(Main St. gen.'' " eral commercial) zone on a parcel of land at 9250 SW Tigard St.(Wash.Co., ' tax map 251 2A13, tax lot 3400). ' ti. MISCELLANEOUS: &.1 FLOOD PLAIN FILL PERMIT lvl,• ; q7 , I4ov�re Lee) A request utast for a flood•';, plain fill permit to fill lands presently�'� ::, situated within the'100 year flood plain, r, located at 911;0 SW Burnham St. 4 (Wash. Co. taX map 2$1,`2AC, tax lot' 200). (tabled,fro m February 17, 1976, l, meeting) 6.2 SIGN CO17E APPEAL SCA,5.7&! ` (Oregon Food Service) A request by Earl Adams for a variance of Title 10, ;,• Sign Regulations, Seetii�n 16.40,010 — ,.� Flags, banners, political signs, , ('it 2699—Publish April 22 9,1'9711) K t '!5 '' i 1 YI. iy1' It'3, i W, 4 4 •4',' \,,,,4,, e , , .6.,, V,.t., ,,‘I', ).■, 1 t •: ':::,'1. t,,4 .1.4 '4 0 it ,''', AFMAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) , P Y 4 County of Washington ss. ., ..,, City of Tigard 4„. '"''t,. .' .t:. I, Patricia A. Trachsel , bei:ig first duly sworn, on 0',.. oath depose and say: .:,., ,,. That I am Secretary for the Planning Department •,, ,., for the City of Tigard, Oregon. ., ,. .' That I served notice of hearing of the Tigard , Planning Commission. of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each of the foowing named persons on the ;2.4, eX day of 4,1 197../LI by mailing to each of them at the . 1 / addr shown on attached list (Marked Exhibit B) , said !sfAsh , . notice as hereto attached, deposited in, the United States Mail on the ....11.0riL day of _ 24 (,!_____ , 3.974 , 4 ,. postage prepaid. , .. i,,,.**) / ,'Ik, + s .`.'. . • Subscribed and sworn to before me on this .c>?6/ tri- • day of ' . 19 1 C* , ' . ........ ........, '''■ r4 , ) , • 4 ci Naiary iblic of Oregon —....._ , \ er My commission oxpires: //- . ..... .y, ,..' .!-. ,.., , 1 * - , 1,Or 11 V” ■O 1'1' . V 0 • ''7: •': . . ' 4 \ t ' q CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 4., NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING , ,1 st . , i ',..,. , 4 I Dear Property Owner: ,,. ., The agenda enclosed for the next meeting of the Tigard Planning 1 ... Commission includes an item (circled in red) which, due to its , location adjacent property owned or occupied by you or due to your previously i.ridicated interest, the City feels obligated to notify you . 4, If you wish to make your views known in this matter, or if you ''''';' only wish to avail yourself of this opportunity to be informed 2., concerning this project, the Tigard Planning Commission invites , you to attend this meeting. , . .I1 . ...o, , .., , , , . ' e .•, . !. ) 1 ,t. ,•, ) 1 ...gt • ' ( $ ,! t •' W--'--- --------------, , `e■A' ': .•. , ‘P, . ' , 4 ; IA * 41, , )t ' . 4 4 ( , NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING , r. AGENDA '.,. Tigard Planning Commission May 4, 1976 - 730 p.m. , • . Twality Junior High School - Lecture Room . 1 14650 S. W. 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon -r. , ,•,. 1. CALL TO ORDER: . , l'•' ,,, .,- 2 ROLL CALL . ;':.. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: , ,t • COMMUNICATIONS: , , ... 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS: :, .i . 5.1 ZONE CHANGE ZC 4-76 (Roberta OtDonoghue) ,,• : A request by Roberta OtDonoghue for a zoning map amendment ,- to zone a parcel of land at 7310 SW Spruce, presently zoned , County RU-4 (urban residential) to R-7 (single family resi- .. • dential) . (Wash. Co. tax map 1S1 36AC, tax lot 3700) . • 5.2 ZONE CHANGE ZC 4-75 (Kenneth Bunn) . A request by Keneth Bunn for general plan and program re- , n view of a proposed multi-family (83 unit) residential • planned development in the vicinity of 109th and Canter- bury Lane. (Wash. Co. tax map 1S1 34B, tax lot 500) . : 5.3 ZONE CHANGE /C 3-76 (Belanich) A request by Roger lE3oianioh for a general plan and program review of a proposed commercial planned development in the , , . vicinity of 121st, 122nd and Scholls Ferry Rd. (Wash. Co. tax map 181 34B, tax lot 500) . ! r 5,4 'ZONE CUANG111 XC 5-76 (Hanson-Fletcher-Parsons) , A request by Hanson-Fletcher-Parsons or an amendment to , a planned development approved Juno 10, 1974, for property } f: located at the Southeast corner of SW 72nd and SW Varns Rd. (Wash. Co. tax map 251 1D, tax tot 900) . , ',5,5 VARIANCE V 4-76 (Charles McClure) ir A request by Chqrlos McClure for a variance to the front yard setback requirements In a C-3M (Main St. Coneral Commemial) gone on a parcel of land at 9250 SW Tigard St. (Wash, Co. tax map 281 2A8) tax lot 3400) . i .. . .10A..■ , 4 .. .,, I A , ''^ ,, o . Te■,:` 14, j ' .'. • ill V ' I .•, 0 1 r I'll.q. m4. A ii. / Page 2 '. PC Agenda , , May 4, 1976 . ., , ....,c 6. MISCELLANEOUS: 6.1 FLOOD PLAIN FILL PERMIT N 9-75 (Howe Lee) • .‘, A request for a flood plain fill permit to fill 3...ands presently situated within the 100 year flood plain, located at 9110 SW Burnham St. (Wash. Co. tax map „ , . • 281 2C, tax lot 200) . 4 ,.% (tabled from February 17, 1976 meeting) P I' 6.2 SIGN CODE APPEAL SCA 5-76 (Oregon Food Service) i•, •,, A request by Earl Adams for a variance of Title 16, 0 '`..! Sign Regulations, Section 16.40.010 - Flags, banners, 0 . political signs. ,., '''' 7. OTHER BUSINESS .r 1' 8. ADJ , 4' .i'• • ',,, , . , ' - • „ ,.. •,, • 4, '. .?, , • *'• 'X • . * . . , f , i % li -- — — _ i ___ __ ,-,- -- — , —, — -- t, '10 .11 '..,.o. 4' 4!e 'V , 1‘, , '• %.4...il l'e. 0 ■ 4• '(" .4. 1 ' Meetings of the Tigard Planning Commission are governed by provisions of Title 2 of the Tigard Municipal Code and ORS Chapter 227. Under those statutes, certain , ., standards are established for the conduct of public meetings. ct It is the policy of the Planning Commission to adhere to a format in the Public Hearing process that is designed to afford the applicant and any objectors an r: ..,. opportunity to be heard and to allow the Planning Commission the opportunity to .; „. 1 , obtain sufficient fact.Jal and subjective information on which to base their „ , decision. Accordingly, the following format will be followed: .i; . Public Hearing_ 02.ened , ‘. i, .,. A. Staff Report B. Applicant's Presentation ■ V ” t..•: , . C. Public Testimony 4, D. Staff Recommendations E. Rebuttal/Cross Examination .,.. Public Hearing Closed r—r......,--....rt.. ..------1... .....— —I,.—.....---.--.7..-. , ‘4 n, F. Commission Discussion and Action :.. A recorded transcript is kept of all Planning Commission meetings and a transcribed text can be merle from that record, should anyone so desire, but at their own time & cost. All, testimony offered in a public hearing must be identifiablelso, before testifyIng, please address the president of the Planning Commission and identify yourself. 1 . ,.. Any testimony offered is subject to cross examination and/or rebuttal, so be pre- pared to defend your position. . .; All actions of the Planning Commission must be based on fIndings under proviHou , of ORS Chapter 215.055. Generally those findings will be made with r( sp( ci. to d ' particular conditions or circumstances of the site and the proposal and will ,,. address the following points: 1. Comprehensive Plan conformance; 'k , 2, Changes in local conditions or previous error supporting applicant's request; A4 3. Impact on adjacent properties and on the community; tw ', ,... 4. Availability of other suitable locations; 5. Impact on public services and facilities; 1 6. Cominunity need I , P „:•(.4, '1';‘$, :4•, i::::' ',''• ' .•.'. ..V. r , 1 t, t cone C v ng,it ...,„: 4:14 4. •Ar 4 ii” .:Iki i,..,. tt two 1 r I 12 rn Iiiktk:\ '-: S W Go zA A 1 .., , ,.. ,..., 4 1 ., x-:,..-- ...,.._.... r tlii .,..1, i,„ AM , S It rl m 1 ,,....‘, . .,..:„ 1 HA •N rTi ____] II, „n■:,1 M 3 "„.. ,.. . . , . . , . .1„, Immam.., on NECININS0111151010 Mel ININENNIMMIIMEM NW MIIIIMEseinergell '... ,,,, , 1 ;:->'"*--....,.., , q-, , fr ,.,0 H.. . y, .. H.,, „. ,, . ,. II a,. e.. , . , ,... ,, ..,..., : :A-, :! ' . . , a , .....,,,, III SW _J IRIVI ' STREET:, , „..„.4., ...,,,, „ ,,, a. ,,, , ,,,,, ,,,,,,,,., ,...,,, ,, ,, ... : . ,' . _ 11111 - 1•-.1 ;,, :' ',2,', „, - ..........-.___, W TVA R N S ,.............. .‘,. ar.,.... ,' , i 1-- ■ 0 (fi ., . STREET .,1 . , 1 .• 4. : * _ ,•11 t ..1 ,‘ ''.4 , (11 ” .... --1 if:::*".:::::::'*::::::::•:::::::::::::::::::::::::::;"::::,*;;;iiii:? ''1 i • r'd"• ■.;;., p < —"— .Xcl't — F .., p D m . s w m r..1 R sTREE ::::!..11::::::St, : :i •• t.:::::::::::• », ::•;;;*;:::::::::::::::::::::::::;):,:;;;;;:::::::::::!!;:iiiiiiiii:i - - _ :::::::::::::::::::::::::0,00:::',, .,,, (1 0......... , ■': \‘ Is ::." ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::*^' 1 $1:.....:::::::::::::::::::::::::.:1 1 ,, ti 1 .... . 4 :04:.:4i:4:)iii:::4iiIiiiiiii!,' ...'4 104 4, .- .. ,r. .. - 1 1, , . 4. . , . ......1.:,:.:.:.:.:,......:.......:..........:....:....:.:.::1.2k:.:....x....c . , ., 4.. to -- * cHERRY STREET i'-)1 . ,,,t• 1\11 4 ..................................... sANDGURG i •, ' 1 i ,,„ 1 •, = STREET ... M 3 i a ,.„ m , M 2 , I \....................-...........,„ { , [...-- 4.1--....„',N.,„. ,4 ), . ,..,,, •a �, r _- �_ .VALUATION Q _ ADDRESS ilt s'� - NAME LAND Ii�P o t .. / {: LOT � ° j t fit' r - _ - ..-_-_-,_.,-is,: :--, ._- 1- 1 ,'''--- r,.. .1 . ' - ------` -- .41- 4...)1111111 dist_:,. . JIMA- . 1 ,,,- am , .4r ._ i. _I :I.. .. A.,_ __ _ i jir7f:J.,:::- i _:-'--, 1 d ,....1_,. , :- . „ , ----- ------ -NB . ta•MMMNMMIIIBAIMIMIVIIprnrjnrPOINPIRMINIIIIj _ s��l�r1Xl ..-ia i.►a- .a �/ 111121V:. :: 1,7 NI . A A - -' - .- Q �L �� tr fif _ 1 „ . IFISMIVISIOPMIMM. f j p7 o�- 9. .7-0 ,;,; t 1 i 111111.111111.01,11111 1 MINE ri: MIMI .-'4'I s ,-i: IIIII 1' 11110 _ - iiiiillailli .11 1111 --:1'i __ t t z_::-t -L. ... 111111111 imumillillia iiiiiimmi } 1 1 111111111111111111111111111.11111111111111111111111111111= \ n - _ -- ,, _ _-.. • f tai . � -. ---. . ... . ..� -- v .�__-_ _..�.. a_�.-- ..ms's_ ._•_ .: .sue . F ---.7';:----::-.. ..:.-'''.:7-:- . 4 _ - 1. "�,�^--ter _ ''''''�� TAB ? ,_-mow' ck Paul a `Pen NAPE PC JALgATIQNa ra A'!rRS �.'� i •IGiSTE�E�, LAND ` # � �/f` - VOTER I g 1 tNF `°IR 1 it IIINIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIII It 11 i It t x, I i. MIME . . . 1 1 Dot's �.t�yx KC,12 I 1 a r / I d t fir .j =1:.t IL - # r� `l, - j inMeill=1.1 M !flit f ° v/< f( L - 7:.4) I 1 ..- ka" i'llir ', t i ranergalliraMMil teo his - r. _ I aft '- :P ' - -'' -':- - t- li I 1 i i'll 1 1 CITY OF TlaARD P.O.Box 235W -, 1242G SW Main Tigard,Oregon 97223 •-• 10 Roberc,4 Jean Gage Rt. 3, 143 Newberg, 0 97132 -*- - -1._;..,'-'-...::.2.::"::.:;.-'---f • 1 I1 CITY OF TIGARD . ' 12420 S.W.Main -,-,- -i.,.., --°". i--'' --` 7 ''-' - ' FIREPP,IIIE i\tEtb., ,r.......= Tigard,Oregon 97223 \ - \,, 4. ,o-pc,, i - --, - 4. A -.., -:... , ',.. I \ . . . V' 'iCk Joseph Foul,A t c/o B T In.,estment Co. , ri—S t-f-,------- /{ ----- (7.- Portland, •r. 97213 Ift ,'"' '',"■", r- n ; I • 0 .4 Ut 1 U r1,111:3i,t(t.i .! 41,-,-ri ,••-• --,,-- ,..... l'.i L. t..'',:- I - - - ._ - --: -,-, .. -_ ---, _.. . --. ----*- --_:- • , -- ---_ _ - --- - 3 , - - 3 • . • • - .,- -------,----- ,--r, ' 'r_ , 77'1*-,-•-=-±4-":...,,,-.:,_-_-:- ---'......----:_.-:i.:-.,:--",:t--'-'."2==:41•2,:-=';"i-7;:;4-`;::*7:;7-1,„,*--..-?-:11:-,,T,--1-•::3„-f*3,- ;::=--.:"-,-;-:**-i:-:1--':::-.i,`:-:::::$.,----7*,*".,- f....-':="2- 1-i:'--YS-_"7. -_;';::,`:::'_;--;"7"=--:.•:-41'1."..:-'''..2-;t:,-:•:*,.--2-,';:!,-if;:f.-.-..'.',:f;::',-,..1,7_.;_N*,:;.1.- ., ...4%' •'c. ';'..i 4, ilii;':■.' ,.. *i,..'.,.. '!'''.: ■i i':::; '4. ..'I ', CITY of TIGARD, OREGON '•• . .7:,.4.:. ENGINEERING DIVISION, R VI, DEPT, , x ',', .,., REQUEST, for ENGINEERING ,.,... .,.,,. .., ,.--,-, , „ LOCATION: kY1) "-2, 5._..... .ED) „..,. ......••••■■•■••*.•■••■•■•••■•■•••■■• , 1 •.';.;', 4■ " . • ' , , ■••■■•■■•••■■■•••■*... ....,............. • .............,...*•............ ............ .....,.......,......... r'''''•4f :A • YS•.;,• ACTIVITY ' ii) CotAktegekilL OT‘;10,- Pii-e-Ae. AM '41 ,...,______________ _____ , - - . . • ''i,,,.;•' "Y• , , • •••••...........*.*.m....... ....... ...........n...........o.' - + *YAM/ '',:.•: , , • ■'.14,, • i$:: ......................................... WWI.* 4.4.44444.44.4.44 .4.444.4444a44.404.44.4...444.44444.4.44.4.444.4.44.444.44., 4444■4444*.mormomoveal0 , I:' 41.e, 1,i!. 1 *44.w.......... ""..*"............."."..... . , , 44..44..r4.4.4*4.. ..........4. . .............................................................................................,....................................... ................................... VIIIINI 'i'''' !! i .,, ■ SKETCH/DIAGRAM: .,:.„ • :".;. , ° 45 0 )3 a. )\3' k 812-AC. S-T . ,;.. 1.,.. ,.. '. . LO, ol-S o 6 .:. .!''.t j'• j• : , • '•',',' . .'•t ACTION REQUIRED : ' ., 1 , 1 ,.• ..,, ., ,. _. ,......,.. 0..4* . „.,, .4 016,,1 2.1 ts 6 12 3 1 t:.: C. L Sl k' ■ t,CO'' I) ---)..0— , IZENtsZr , c ,•., 0 IMMEDIATELY O SOON AS POSSIBLE 0 FUTURE NEED .i 0,' i.--_, - • ,12,\C2IC.— .:., REQUESTED BY i ,1 ....., .-> DATE , 4 -,.........,, . ,4I (Pdtitaln arl(11,d1—Rout(ti 2 OpyS) . . ;',: . • :. ACTION TAKEN: 1°(• •Ad. 17,20.1S° • g.-° eta: #, 4 -' 'T..t'l'. 'Li 4.-..,.L....-.'Lx4.6L....."' 11°IL ej -/6 it .. ',3': ........... , • ,1' ...,t14,111± ' 6t.) . . ,...• ... . , 44 1?.s.2..... , 0.4_,,,,,y_l_ta....tP, '1 6.,, \I. 17.4,.d23.L.a,„210.1.4d,11,1_ kv=4.,. :?. . .1 , •, • 1 -:, , 1 bATh , , 1(26 � c)kt i L ! V�e.�. MIL, 7►' 4 14210 c n�.;L 1 c,~cp�. �,-6 c.C1 1 ' 1 • �M r r 4 02.0 5-`$- v J ' y 440142t1,1 ALL, £L=A k {4 t+4a w oy c. &Vi'S 4 1'2-4 ■`1c4 tv\► r 1`i ► 44;;05'G 16 ,44.,,t zw 1/4 t a '; '» �.� 4,i c)60.0 1 1° :��a�a3 � + 'a.w VM vt,�a��. 1c�'�. h'.p�t��. � (``�1 �7 �' :�1�� � � M ��r4w.z ► e I► s t I�4 �� :�► �-t o a t�h ,�W ;ate, / Lt,a , `" /1 i � e t` � � c�. �.a, +.��t� t.� Rip w; � 670 2.6415`0 4.4e4.6 b N..L "77 A61 e.. cieic w,t 1.4 ' i s #'z 4 4 , �7l✓ 1: /7 r 7. ',bee p c :ti 1 b I 2. ' et / ►, k` i c. Lz. e c Z.C3 4 , ; V s J 444,b1 ,fir j e44 n� rei, `agt 2.0 .e,e ay-e . w.c,„r c t wc.c u i roc: ' It:4�Y•+6 1 d"x...1 „, & © W 44s..a..4.7'4 •l.3 r f`eryt f r,„.ek 10 6 4 e.."e,f,", . �' bra t... I r " Vv‘-e+)Y" k 0 era I Y" ; ujc L-01'44. IA 44.11 PC et)") 4kr CIAl• 1,44 I V' 006, V 4"471444... ,,1-0 4Lia. us,). (4. dP LePt I V..tot,.0Z, � k na.t Cr +-) r r l I°e.c, ' c K. 77- ` v- . AL c_ Qs (A�t '-doi-1:«1+,1'. 91 c v k�t/` ��? AL k;�, 1.1,0 y' , -�� L4 44,4- (milrj . 1�M ,�..4y4iat�G-"-�'3F=r1'lllYitilY,�-:•.�•+.«,.y'r� ,, 1 �r� LILY vw �''� G`t.,4,A) ��..f�A.4:: fol'" �i f M. )(.FJr. ,y.G`s ,ttt 4' C+7 kt 1 pc 4...o 4- it ' .' 4- t, b 1'4' e P,W4 44.4)t.; I YY � �I t� 1w 6'. "44' rj, c,. + ie I t491 4:Le. w 64,4"10,,,41*' v ti's �''q pt, -"it-A tit#t, ,iptio 4 its. M4 ? &M AN/ '7)/4 c.pLei 44 11 Se. C,110(i) 4 . - . y r Y ♦ ` ' • T T �- - -. ,-. ..1 _----. -- _I .---. ..,)i,..,,'..-• iw - - '+-_G - �_ _ - _ _ - - _ y�_- - 7-3' h 'i:.• . C- _ - _ - _ - _ •'f :44;9- ' c Via- '•i° - �.• - - - .•i - -' - `•t` _ :-.;,.2-.:;-•_--.,..:-.' - - ^.s: +p` s� - - - - e-<a _ - ti_C•i� --.7.1-4-4-4,-.7:- -,•!;..--2..,,.2----.-.:7-�G _ _ _ - .7'a' - - --.1.:i•----...:7'1.+',- - .'w_s.'� �_:-� - - �6�`'✓�sr•'r-' r-" - i,i ��' := -- - -. - t7-•` _ '.4.":',�..'« -�i.y. i. - - :f .r:f:.•.'•. :.7-c - - _ - _ - --= • - _ - - - _t�i-. .. L• `Y?_!� e -'K:i . - i .1.-F •-.-SS .1_ '4i ''•t,.•.--..-- t _ � -. -f - - _ .7••,.?...-- ,ti•;'-!i • • - ' s♦_ •: -ate- . •. _ ...n ' � -• • v- � •-- va - .; • .K - _ r ♦- t s �_ • _ ' . • _ - - `_ . _ _ CENTERLINE CURVE DATA �/ ,! SCALE. t"- 54' A R. L_ Ch• ChB I - ` - LOCATED IN LOT { AND A PORTION OF LOT i 90.0000- 50 78 54' 70-71' N-45'42-00--E ,SATE:JANUARY,1977 t / . - • 2 YARNS ACRES, S.E. I/4 SECTION I, T 2S 2 90'6J00` 5C 00' T854' 70 Ti 5-44•I8°CJ-E ¢� r r I/4„SECTION 3 90.00'007 50 00' 78 54" 70.7:'S-45-42"'7=W ; c :t _ - - : R-{1(a �C`i�_M_CETY OF T{GARD,WASHIN.GTON COUNTY,ORE. 4 9o-oo0CF 5000- 7854 70.7i ti-44•18`00=W . - li iy Q_ 5-.0-'1'9,30-1.4- SOO.737 ¢4°.� f •�zTl CT at,00- G tt0 00- 0 CtS_OG tz3.00-� --.LOT CURVE DATA ` . /`- �i ./.- ,_--o�--- ! I 90'00'00` 10.00` 15_71' 14_i4 N-45'42'00=E / .`� _ OE�a _ r W t 90'0000 10_00' 15.71 14.14' 5-44-t8'Oo''E _% e.�_ta' E- 0-E°_' - - . - - Q 1 33'49'44- 68 o0` 40_,5' 39.57` 5-16• t2'52'-E '.5--... . "e'•����r� � : - - - n - o - 2 25'29'14" 68000- 30.25' 30.00' 5-45' 52'2 t`-E . e/ - Q _ 01 . 3 30741-02` 68.00' 36 41' 35.98' 5-73' 57'29--E _ z./9.Y _ ' ` - O 6 • 7 _ - , ' 6 e 5 Cl ` 4 32'30`00- 6800' 38.57' 38-06' N-74. 27.00' E < - 2a_Sct3 4 a 20..,c,4-7`4= n l.3,o t6 4 z3-8z8 9 - c 5 25'29-14- 68 co' 30-25' 30.00' N-45' 2T�23=E �/ - 9 a 0 s[ _ 6 32'00'46' 68.00' 3T.99` 37.50- N-16' 42'23--E - .•1. . '� a 3o_'t•s`4 _ a. _ - -{ • • = 8 36'23'52- 69.OQ' 43.20' 42 48' N-ir 29-56--w , - �. • - -�, c G• 9 25'29`t4� 68.00' 30 25' 3Q00 Nr48' 26`24"-L;t _ 1. l'e- 'n - :D av`- • , - • _ 1 0 28'0654- 68.00` 33.37' 33.03' N-75' 14•33,W =F 4 ii w , oo'-t?'oo=E t t Y"2t`50- 68 OQ` 30_10' 29.86` 5 ]B' O1'QS`-W a. s �o F°D°a'�'i •" tto.00' 4 te.3 .4 •j• ats,00' ti 68.00' 30:5 30AQ' S 52' 35`33" W�s` 6_# tir __ ! z _ - • v�✓�` l3 39'0356 68.0?• 45.46' 4556' S-2O' 16'28 W• _ t t P_ .7 a' 13 90'0000 IO_o0 15-71" 14A4' 5-45'42'OCf-W 00`Y�'OO`£ tB-['T9- _ 0 _�-Jf3`•i2'OQ ti.! 154-00- t� = • • 3 �fff������ - t • t3 90'0000 10.00` t5 Tt• 14_14" _N-44• te•00=W T-':"1-4(3a°- • "' °Ys tt '�-J-/-f- - .�----��� : a • .''} - '"� y� 4.--1/-�i - -_ - t4 90.25.'0029:1004i 32 CO` 5027" 45.26' NS-_-5152." -45. 42'OO"-E ` f w Z J _ s, 2g-"g - �s _ V F - 4 - ' _ 8 - i4. 90•00 00' 32.00' 5027' 45.26' S-44' i8'00' E ' i Jfc ` - b-.- 'r -1-• 20rT96 0 15 90'00`Ocf -32.00' 50.2T 4526' 5-45' 42'OCf-W a ■a• • I YkE IS 90'00'00' 3200" 50.2Y 0526' N-4 4' 18'00` W 42., to - o vet - . .,. / a aa>.- z5-°3O' 4, - c O Q _ . 0 - - - m SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE'I,WILLtAM L.MCMONAGLE+FIRST BEING DULY' 07 tip - 0 0 , N ' . Ot S o N_ 1.3 ocs♦t2"oa_•I + SWORN.DEPOSE AND SAY THAT I HAVE CORRECTLY SURVEYED AND MARKED WITH SIB- '` ?�<� 1-4 N_ 15 - ��"�=r?= .r�°.+�� "• J x30-IRON RODS ALL LOT CORNERS,CURVE POINTS AND BOUNDARY LINE CHANGES IN•t ♦- + 2 .Z5,...7-co* - . 23..7-4.0 31 DtRECTiON THE LAND REPRESENTED:N THE ANNEXED MAP OF-VARt4S PARK',AND AT E tt ' THE 1NLTtAL POINT OF SAID SURVEY I SET A 2-01A_s 36-LONG GALV.IRON PIPE 6` u� U 12-00'+.=OD•=E 1.90 YS it . t G. ._ - r. 0 u�'. 0 T7-- ��. BELOW THE SURFACE OF THE GROUND,SAID INITIAL POINT BEING LOCATED N•00'42007, - r• - - C E- - G - - i;r 909.31`ANO N-89'15737=E 50 02'FROM A SIONE MARKING THE EASTERLY 5E_CORNER•.' _ S n 9 _ : • sr. n p• 3 OF THE W.W.GRAHAM D.L.C.NO.39;THENCE=5-89'15'37'w 50.02'i0 THE CENTER- t t LINE OF S.W.72nd AVE.C_R.472;THENCE:ALONG SAID CENTER LINE U-00'42'00=E-go i. a : .7-r L_ _- - • ^ir .1.; _ s zt_8SZ +'t, 637.14-TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SW YARNS �: n It - J q y` . 2 ROAD C.R.1266;THENCE:ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE N-89.20.3-8-E Lc.-'- 7-a is 'Its - r;..1...'13.: F Yi 57509'TO THE SOUTH-WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-will'LINE OF THE BEAVERTON-TIGARD s--- 0 o ? 'r'• _ -t- 6 s - .4 i _ zy-* - x 4 az ., HIGHWAY NO 217;THENCE-ALONG LAST SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY S-35'43`1!-E 165.32 Pi i gSa_ J !;� - `�� TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 2,VARNS ACRES•A SUB DI VISION OF RECORD IN• t"� O-V n,-. .- ..-.-6 '',..,-4 .....-.I-4.-... _. = -•`-' .-54. .y..3 WASHINGTON COt!NTY,OREGON;THENCE:ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE 5-00'19-30W 2 .s .- t r' mss- k t - L^+` t>^� • - t,-7-oc'•t2"ooeE t5s-0t' 500173`TO A 3/;•IRON PIPE MARKING THE S.E.CORNER OF SAID LOT 2 ALSO --.. s ;- -,- !- _ ^�+A''- 70, t3•oo-+7-z-o0=F, t5L o0' _1¢-5° • .: BEING THE NORTHERLY N.W.CORNER OF THE JAMES HICK.iN D-L_C No_43;, ~Tt TEc_0 -;�`- T9-oo' .� THENCE:S-89 15`37=E 626.55•TO THE INITIAL POINT OF BEGINNING_ .j _ - 4tic c `• ,,,t. " �-4 ■ , - CONTAINING 9_41 AC_NET_ A� 7-S •• Tfi�ry 1C•t0 )II 50 3B SD ¢'t0 4-CS 4• I f ••ice �5� ..•:".." C L �'' o �•,o" a=4o c•- "1 SUBSCRILED TO BEFORE ME l''..-•:-/-1;ff - 't'-��i1' V - t, THIS OF •Ft I. ,1977 #� -2`;-1z IQ 4:_-.•.,t -•o _1. - G - + _ NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR OREGON- fit,•,-••_•;,•••'t, / �, !Z �t [3 I 2 . - - MY COMMISSION EXPIRES--- c-rrf/ _,:,�,,� 7 t' , 2-,,03s.� -- N - 2=3•••1.97 L+' z3-z�t?St° 3 Z3 jg4.So .t ` r = _•-= .�--';I -•r 703 0- Ova* - K - - G G' i - ut ' 0 - 1. is - -c-. __ "r o 0 0 _• - at - . . - . - o - 2 GOVT.APPROVAL PENDING - e.p f-,1 s - SUBJECT 10 REVISION . _ - -, - .• --- •10-50 3$bO-_$ �' .. w "t¢ :7-..- _'•-- .- •- - _•- _: r•yw _ -'Q s wti.c...a:". a.- (iF .?,�i..n^'^ R t': '_!+E •.. n - - _ _ 3-I:E - - _ - - . • . •- { - Q 20'L7t_O•t/i1•SQV= L 2ti OEo c -rtOt-1 - _ i5 _ - - - •• - f ,t - - '.• . -1- ;} C...SC ICs ;rlw ,1 0 • - - n� . 3toNE FD.w/-x-010 Yofl C7- t .08.`4 ,� __ EL S E COCCw3LC si 47- 1 - S W 72nd AVE_' CR 472 _ - ��_4- - Y' Std 50 - -, _ -- _ 00'•+z`00..E 709.31'_ `•-� GKAHgM 0 t_L_iJ0 34 - - a.T-00-`sZ-00 E .3T t`:` 0 - -:‘ U • 4 4 . , ■ . ' , .. . , . . , .. . , . . . 'ZONE CHANGE - CONDITIONAL USE - VAIlIANCE - TEMPORARY USE - NON-CONFORMING . . USE REQUESTS . • . . „ - . 1 4 • , I . • .. . 4 ■ APPLICATION'• . ; . • • .. — ' Fi3.e # S.....‘ 9 6' . ,... .•'..:' , ' „ . . ., , Fee Reel d., fr 4.,2 :, . , .... ' Tigard Planriing'Commission 69-4173. R.eaelpt .# /.? .f. 124P0 SW Math St, , Tigard, Oregon 9 P.23 Date Reo t d. 54 f/:„.9- -7C ,. . • . . . . . , . • . . . . . , . . . . ::,if-..„,....,..„..,...„--.......,...„.„...,,,,...,,-.....-...„.......,....,,,.,-...,.....„..,,,...-.-----..--.-.„..:-...,.......,,„,,,......,,,...................................,.....,...........,,,,,,,.............,....7_,..-....,„,......-...,.:,. ...,-. . PLEASE PRINT IN'INK OR TYPE . .., . . Acton R.eve a ted .-,,-- -,_.....:--....,Plattnesilbilllest.e..lopine.0-Approvo.1--*.,-**r.L"-r='"".4*".**.•.•' . , . • App 1 i c mit'$ Vain a_ '. ' 'Fletcher 1,-,Islizim_Ucitsons____ . _Ph on eL/92--,076L ,.... App:).4 c ant t a AddreS8.,*. , 5P..,§, W....,51<ylltm.BlysiL.,....591ta.14—RociisandOrego.niS..722.1 . L.,... - . ,. • . . . ' 17:-3..tree76-5 . , . - ' ccity) - si;ate) Cii,i) ' • '''. Own'ei4ts Name, , : Flefcrier,Pahsen'3< Pqr$035 ,_...,_. .. Phone'292-001_,' Owner'a Ad.dr a 8 S.,,,,_,___L., •1....7565....i toils..44.nellxcl-„luite-120. 2.otiatact.riOteci..4o' 1-122.1:' ' ' ', ' . . , .. Applicant i8: Owner.., Contract; Purchaser XX_ Developer Agent _ . ' . . , Other . .............. , , • .. , * .Owner R.ocognition of' application:_,. Rbbetf- , it et-fdtF. .4d111,,,Mon't611.8,..Pcie.sohs-. .., . , gal) 7 4 .. e./1 . , . .. . .., , •. . . pc,.r LI on r a spon EtJ.1)1 e for applioation_ _Robext_M„„flofgher,..&,:c ampbalit..4s..t.,4rube-&-Parillers ,,.• s._)6/„,,,Aaff.pe.sop.....5.tree.t.„-Pottitirld.,0.,..Qteefoil-9.7.-20.1.-------- - -.-.- —--- --,-- . (q:.1-'1,Y) '(statel ' , -12,1p) .' . . PROPERTY' INVOLVED: Tax Map #. ? 1 1 D,.,_, Tax Lot(a)a) 900 , _ „...... .. Blocks 1 CihtT2 Vas Acklifrowo ..' .. Address t t q.4 dolliet 5,4.1Wi_Z2hCI Ayejtp OA S.L.Zi—Vornslioet__Are a.,,„,,,,,' 9,3!6_,„,_, .(acres) . ! Exi.sting Dui.ldings (# and : , • Ctirr ant z on tnti,' _,:____Mt__„,„____________,___,,,.__Curr mit Ltse__Unchiyolopedjorest. .____ . .1 • , .' APPlicarrb I 8 Co.mniettica Office Park ' Prop s a d Zoning_i__x : ___,,,,,_______Proposed tlabyD „, * S U011ISS ION li.Y.`,QUI111.24a TS: Ti{1.o o Rap o rt "Fa El€1/10 ilrIc,(4111:00t11(illt8 -----, . . . egal. Description Vio.J.nitY` I4oP ' . • . _ Tax Map Site tiovolopment Plan • ' . • Sit Plan . .....-- . . i . . ... •. • . ' . ; . . , . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . f. ' . . , . . , . , . . I A • 0; A tt 11 0 • , . . , k . . • , . . . ',,, FEDERAL AID URBAN SYSTEM PROJECT REQUEST 9/ . NOTE: This form is intended to collect general information for proposed projects so that the State and Federal Highway Administration will have a better Understanding of the requested project. " Please use the footnote area to ' answer any ambiguous questions or to explain any unusual conditions. 2 Date Februa tt 7,, 19,.5 Applicant Agency City of r' a'_d nCL N hh F' n C.Q I' t ' _. Federal Aid System Route No. _Route Name 72nd Avenue ' t. • Project Name 72nd Ave. Phase T, I-iwy. 217 to Bonita Road voi0a, Project Length .85 mile (4,50Q :fit, Project Location ( ttached sketch ma ) ,o Project Description_ S.W. 72nd Ave. from,Highway 217 overcrossing to S J . Fon, .a 3,.oa_d - W Pn i ng, rpiic n.4tom A i o4_11innr real,..l mei t4 . . __.S" .` "zati.on and i7j_tuminat'n1'la _ . t, Design s Aver�Sge Daily Traffic 3550 De Speed 30 . Complete A p1icable Sections: . I. ROADWAY DATA : L. Existing Roadway (Attach sketch) Width 2-4' _._. Travel Tar'ies_1'1 1--'j.�72_Amers3 :, Shoulder s 0p . Mcdi ans ., Parking, 1Vaae.__r. _ ..... Sidewalks Tone . . other Open roadside drainage, ditches . . • 2. Desires �2badway Cros Section: (Attach sketch) , tttriq lane n 2. with center ,hook o rS , Width� 'Q Trai�el - Medians(Center' itirti. lane onnl asking . Curbea` Yps ,„. l Ql'lceX".s le Length Curb adii ,x i Si tr?walk/skeWa .. t . . . . , OtherJ ajaaib n_g .r►d , '.a .1.: 2,tL t` ra ' ki 04 t . oo`!' .....S5. See . tt.che,d .k. ,toh. ae r 1.4 i. 1"..o.a. ...* 7Y, I Y.W#w,4 4 ,, 4 I.:' i , . . . . . . .. . . t. Description of Proposed Roadway Work Total reconstruction to . • include_purabssP of..adAdiamml_rigb±=nf=way÷_raasmstruct to . two 13 ft. _travelaarle_s_ktith a 14 ftaenter turn. lane4 curbs, W.alk—and_s_thrill—driainrage,..-- __ 1 A A • . • . 1 . A . . • • II. RIGHT-OF-WAY DATA , . ,. . • . 1 • ----- — 1. Existing Right- of-Way: , • General Width 40' Minimum ' 401 . Maximum 50' 2. Wil1. Additional Right-of-Way Be Needed? Yes Explain 'Present R.O.W. - I quall nO.ee .0 • , • . 3. Will cost of additional right-of-way be included in project or will applicant acquire without cost to project? R.O.W. acquisition to be included in project. . , , , *........._..........____—______, • 4. Will there be any persons cisplaced, from their homes, farms or businesses? If so, explain_ .. • , 5. Will this project affect any park or recreation facility? ' No . i ' .................. If so, eXplain • •■■•■•r A*1......1*•■■•.....*•.••.• ,*.........* . 1 . . • III, .TRAFFIC CONTROL bATA . 1. EXisting Signalization: None ......,......, i 4......,...* G■••••....... 4•••••••••••••• ..*****•• •••*•■■•• , $ 1■••••aa.•••.....*•••■••...A...W.. ■ 2. Proposed Signalization: • i 4 • Location CO 72nd. at 217 & liunziker; (2) PossilLt „at 72nd . Bpi-bn Ttvbsraaation TYPd_ ks daiamilleily... `...gissie—Highttay_neldi... . ..Wa. y..2breffic ; , ! Phaoestabz11:13 __ V. 1••••• light6 • • . Type of Sugperision_psile_atiLvire 9 ,_, I —... InEercohnected_tta_ , !) ' othor — I , ....*****4.**...... 1 1 FOOTNOTES: 1 ■■1.1.........+4.6w...14. 1 ' , .m...........• .....***41......... ; . • .._ or ................. i i ho. . • • a 1 • 3. Permanent Si9ning: Include in project or by applicant? Include in project ■ 4. Permanent Stripi.a2: • Include in project or by applicant? Include in project Iv. ILLUMINATION DATA . • I. Present Illumination and LocationL3amen...„_. 21uy mapnrlielts.....batuaan Sprdhurg4n.ad_and...13nnita_Road 2. Proposed Illumination: • Location Type ygtEii ,e21000Zumen.mercury vapo _lights_between Bonita Road and Hwy. 217 or as determined by survey. v. STRUCTURE DATA 1. • ExisLinaQtrUpture: Location 217 Overpass Type Concrete size •."'• " To Remain in Place? Yes prIvpsed structure: tobation No additional structures reoUired is a partipular type of structure and design desired? , Approximate 8i2e Of proposed structure, Are sidewa4k/bikoways desired? t , Are any utilities to be attached to structure? POOTNOT8S: W ■ ° , . • • II — . ' . 4 . , . . . . c , . . . s 4. Are provisions for illumination desired? Ye6 . . . _______ . • . " Are there any unusual or complicating conditions? _NDim_pladauB__ • other thau_13,a,W..._ constraints ,..--.. '.1 I. ,,• . . VX. RAILROAD DATA . . , . . . ' • ; 1. Are there any railroad crossings? NO Location . . . - ,. Type of existing crossing . Existing crossing protection . . • • Nate of Railroali . . . • Number of tracks: Mainline Siding Total" ' Angle of Intersection Sight distance: (Direction) Distance . (Direction) Distance • . , , • Number of Trains: Passenger Speed • — d Freight Speed . • . 4. 2. Will existing railroad crossing be alteed? _____ , . . VII. GENERAL INFORMATION ' 1. Other work or conditions not covered by proceeding sections i 0 1 e - , — . , ..—____..........—_—....... I .. 2. Applicant's tstimate0 of Cost foeReqUested Projeq.t: ; Roadway Work ' ° . • $ 360,000 Right-of-Way Costs (If participating) %,1 ---1571-0-- ' Traffic Control ' 90 000 ..........A_____ Illumination . —..........9.nr690—....— Structures .. Aa. ,.... 'Railroad., .— • ,......... i...............................L........,....* otherLiataLAmt__Aditastra'bive_CpBts @ ,ADO —12,460 _ Preliminary Engirietrin5 by State at 150 , 630630 __ PRO38CT TOTAL $ 5300790,. 1 . . FOOTNOT8St . • • i 0. ' THIS APPLICATION /8 AN OFPIC/AL REQUtST PROMt . ., WaShii..._Ig:_ton ________ coutif:y . , ci tiy of Ti•ard* BY , ,..„, 0....., a.......,.a................. 3y•->t .: '... ,,, ;4:4/, BY,.... . *Zooal share costs to be borne by a City created11,/,,D, which has already been petitioned for. Project 18 1i city end. on a County jurisdiotion road. . i • __ - - b Q _ I\ PROJECT- SCHEDULE: AND SUPPORTING COST ESTIMATE `F PROJECT TITLE. 72nd Air e _ I_ T DATE/11J?5 ,rs I REQUESTING AGENCY Gf'y-- f- Tigard ---._ _ CONTACT PERSON Bruce F. clerk PHONE _ 6354r 1 LOCAL PRIORITY' RANK- _- • -1...- --•..- IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITY:. STATE X LOCAL N • PROJECT IS URBAN SYSTEM. ° X----PRIORITY `PRIMARY URBAN EXTENSION -UMTA STATE BOND • - _ - _ ....- -..• . . _`--�.y `SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN - LEGEN - - - __. . ._ _ . j • ACTIVITY I ;. EVENT A - FISCAL YEAR I tei F ITEM DESCRIPTION 19 1'9 76 19 19 19 19 Cost $ - _- -_ - _ �_- __ ? -_;__ _ - - i - l I I i - I i �?re1 imin�rtr P �i 6 i - s z - - -- --- 3 - i 63,630• I Local. I.'.L�;Fumed -� - ' - —0— R;0.W.: Acquisition - r $5 s 100 •• • • 5, 100 Construction _ _ _ - C:::::::3 462 06O t. 462,060 ._ 4 nearing • . ._ TOTAL. _ ._ _. - - a LRWA S 1111 STATE __._._ �. _---_ ._. _ • , _ 4. ? i LOCAL - _ ._ .__.__ _ _._ _ _ - - - - 78 STATE_ BOND -_ . ____._. _.____ _-. -- ; • -- J __ REQUESrORF CON1 EN1S:'-a F,-.,i .-:-----r:--:- . ,_. -..R._ ,- - . - - • _ F.-,. >'• --.-,° =..G.__;.F -- `." � j CRAG PROJECT I�0. ' • Ab.ovre` acheduIe as_ ire.-6 d `. - , - ` ,,. _ .. . illed *out' . by Stste. t_ ___- CRAG RANKING V t ,s• c� u -��^,�� tr�i r _ - C LG APPROVALS: t• TTAC - - _ .. . __ __ .-- - - --.._. _ _ BOARD_ 6 ,• ' . . *., , .• • i• • p 1 , Ore( State Highway Division • . • • • ' ' . . 1 1 . . * PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT • ! i . : • , ' . . Date Februaryiji_101____ - - . • ! , - A. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION . I I • Name of Project 72nd Aye gs• . -u- i — •-•., - • • Section i i 1 .04A • . . . ,. Location of Project - iot we. • • ...__ _(Highway Name . (Highway No. , US - ORE) . ...... _ • , TA.Earcd Washing_t on , . ! I. City (County)(County) ' - -----Tir ---1 , a Program F.A. ' $530,790 , (FOnding) , (Estimated Cost) • ----CPefix) ' 1 ' I , B. PURPOSE AND ORIGIN OF PROJECT I . 11 . i Purpose: ..... .1.t rTulse is_ALo,_ u• • - - . ' -'-' .: u ,,, u- 00 ... d '" • 1 14 ., ■ 4 I is presently substandard •in terms of safezty and abiliexiffi - • and projected •traffic volumes. 72nd Ave, •connects 99W, 217 at I-5, Bonita r Road at 1-5, and both Upper and Lowertoed at . 1-5. thereby 1 1 . , ''• 1 serving the general public as well as intense commercial and industrial I development. , 3 ......_ ____ ____ ___ I, Origin and History: 7,2nd Ave. has been on the F.A.S. syttem for .several :years and is presently scheduled for construction in 1976. Property owners, the : State has done previous engineering work on his project. 1, , I , • A C. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT .(PROSPECTUS) , . ) , . ...„,..... . , ',4•:-::,,-.:,,,. . , ' Length .85 mile (4,502ftj_ Phase I ,4•!.v.:,••;• , [ Termini Intersection wi_ L121 low o O Bonita Road - _........—... ....-- - . CI , . . .',:.,..'.:....t . • ..,-.. . ! ........_..........._______ ____ - , ."...., . . ..... ................ • . , • • • ,'.4-:,':`:.;.k,...• , i 4 1 0 Al i gnMent (n eV or existing) Ekist,inkLl. nine/.rt with sljaL.- _it realineri.. .•__t...p_._._' . . ,.... . ' existing sharp curves. • ,c,,,, ,..t ..3 ... . • ,...t. • :3, . . • , ,.,. ,. *n , . . ,.. 1 . x Fat% (2') 44 . , . . • , I it S, r r, a • Description of Project (cont. ) Right-of-Way (acreage and type of land use) • ( , . '' ° • Typical Section 60' R.Q,w..; w.ith A CJ' 0.f_,_pwred width to prom d e_± si.-...travet _ 7anes''with a center let turn 1aae _ . -- -- Bi Bikeway a�.keway xia 1 way 5 wide to . t Structures:No stru ,,tares within . - .r . .0. -, • -J .:.. 4 -a . - _ ,. f •SIP - rw. • • ,, Additional Facilities_ Illumination and traffice signaiizat ,onb tr ' I AccesControl Curb cuts to be allowed.. a e ials As haltic concrete roadway, concrete curbs and bikeway/pathway. •( ' , A ' ' . r x Borrow and Waste Disposal ` • I Special Construction Methods• i , ,I, • . [ Characteristics ADT 1.974 ADT- 550, o ected 19 n AD °Go boy- 7oao r; G. w Road is in City ::af'* Other General Information (or 'Supplemental information to items) Tigr but uderi x Washington County j urisdiction. Ad j acent lan d uses primarily .commercial/ industrial with considerable c evelo•able land There res w� �F�+ Five.-H . � L. p �s esses in area 00 e co�npan�:es em Lo .rig� persons on his ,5 of highway. y ar projection by �. shows anticipated empl.o rmen of , t :on b businesses e Boris. ;hate has previousl o fined engineering Work orx t i s sec ..;,.04 1, much of which will te usable on this project. . 1 -e Map is h .�� ttae ed r f .x Yes 4 o f ..... • ` ..• gyp' • x im• See attached lanimetric ma • D. LOCATION AND/ 'DESIGN ALTERNATIVES (IDENTrF( 1\ND DESCRIBE) Due_tsa_e.xLstingd.?ve2_s;,pments, location alternatives are not nor in fact are they desirable in that 72nd Ave. ser21v‘-esaganppes=__qcmnector with Pacific Hi_hwa 991 , 217 at and two other interchanges on 1-5 in an appropriate corridor. This projgct represents a derAign_altarnativg from a previously proposed. dgEign that would have provided four travel lanes within a consAkE21.1/200erR±O.W. ighlt=v424sly proposed desi.gn was found to be unacceptable due in part to a concern Dver- Overdesign and excessive R.O.W. acquisition. E. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND INTERAGENCY COORDINATION Public Input to Date (hearing held, etc. ,LCttyhaaJ2kwners of oven H 80% ofkabut.ng_lgrlijsbo have signed petitions requesting improvement at the proposed design. Ctiy Staff and. County Staff have held informal meetlngs ' . and discussions and County Staff has concurred in this application submission. • A ;, . - 0*-7 • • ■•••4 . , . , . s _. . F. STATUS OF PROJECT DEVELOPMENT i ._ _.... . . k _ . -- . , . . , YES NO DATE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING COMPLETE ' , XX* 1 ' R/W ACQUISITION COMPLETE XX. - , PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND • , . ESTIMATES APPROVED ___ XX _- * State has previously proposed plans for this improvement but at a wider I , cross sectional design. Much of this engineering will be usable on the , requested cross design. , . . . G. bRIEF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF PROJECT AREA I i - Natural (Topography, Soils, Watei- Features, Drainage, etc. ) . Ll The topography in the vicipityofthe project is rolling. There is a drop in elevation from Hwy. 217 to Bonita Roacliplat ft. To our , i , knowledge, soils in the area are primarily clayey loam. Existing drainage crosses 72nd Ave. near the northerly terminus via a culvert. - . 1 (See attached planimetric map of area. ) Act_29_41"A.fe 44. I •. t * t .4■4* 4 * 44 0 .4.444.644.• . '. '' '. ....a........444...........44*-4.4.....-,-.4...44444.440 ' II: ' t . P . . . ,...- .1 ........... ......---.....------ .-................... . ii , ,_...--....--....----a---...v ' .--...*--__............■.....*A...., ' 11 i 0.W•. 0.. . • ............... ' ....Y....We i Wt f'''''..i i,'".17..:'1. 'I:.1 ' • 1.4:P ' :Y' •.4%4 . • 4 I4..;.. ,,:*0 ot,'1..':• ■ 4 • • . 4 4,. ' ''.'" ■ ' . itimmormimm 4 4- t 4 Environmental. Setting (cont. ) • • Cultural (Land Use, Noise, Air. Esthetics, Utilities, etc. ) Abutting land uses Include .7+ r1dentia1 uni.iaammerial_aLl industrial structuresancmgof the existing industrial is of a heavy classification but does not produce off-site noise. BlOzlitg___ utilitie's include Tigard'Water District mains, City Sanitary Sewer lines, gas by Northwest Natural Gas, overhead power lines by P.G.E. and General . Telephone Company lines. Vacant lands are rapidly developing with office and commercial functions. • I • • H. PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENI,–Og--ENV-I-ROWENTAr'IMPATTS—t'----,_„,., Era-rated Right-of-Way Requirements: ; An additional 10'-201 of R.O.W. is necessary. In the residential section, . the additional R.O.W. will be taken from the. other (commercial) side • • k • Consequences: - There are no known adverse impacts resulting from the increased R.O.W. Safety of driveRl property own s and bike/pedestrians will be enhanced. • • ' • • 2, ';'Estimated Changes in Traffic Patterns: , EXisting A.D.T. is 3550. Five Year. prOjected A.D.T. with or without the improvement islapg_ minimum; There is a probability that this improvement will have some tendency to increase the A.D.T. over natural increase. Consequences: The proposed design will 'adequately accommodate the increased traffic. The projected A.D.T. is nob sufficient to cause any significant or measurable increase Iiàir pollution. ' r' ..e • • 4,• 4 40 • . • , • . ,, • , . • • . ; ' • **. - • • • _ . . w . . , Pre'l ,inary-Assessment of 'Impacts .(, t. ) . w , . . . 3. Estimated Changes in Land Use: . . The improvement may Mend to increase the rate of development of. vacant • lands but no land use ,changes ,are anticipated in thdi commercial! . - . industrial area. .• // , . . • • . , . . . . , . • , - . . . , Consequences: . .. .• •. While. the rate of developments increase, no adverse impact is 0 • , foreseen in that such development will occur anyway. The project . will enhance the safety .and viability of the area. , ....._ .. . .._____ _.... . , . .. , , • . . 4. ' Expected Adverse Effects on Natural .. Resources.: . . . . . . . NO change in that this is an improvement on an existing facility. ,. . • . • . • . , • . Consequenes:- . . . . . . . . . . . . . • None. • . • . . . .. . 5. Expected Adverse Effects on Cultural and Scenic Resources: . 1 • As indicated in No. 3 above, development may be hastened which would 1 in some instances replace limited 'natural view with buildings. H. .• • . • , . . a • . • Consequences: • • .,... '', ' • Buildings will be built anyway. ,...-.„•,;- , ,. .. 1 . . , . . .• .,-. . . • I, ..* • , •= •,..,tt ‘ • • 6. tiPreliminary Idenfificition'of. Areas of CritiCal Environmental Concern:2r: . , . . ., . There are no:areas of critica.1 environmental concern indentified. , . -.,. ....- , ' ' ' I • :•14••.'% ‘•■'.. • . ..."4',`.., • - r : -'..11,■•.... •i. • . . . •, . ,. ., ".*Iut,:,t, • ''' 7. Potential for Controversial Issues .• .. • There may be objection from residentltr,rownrs to improvement- if the local 11 share is raised by the L.1D. ,Method ii that these * t 4.:,•J. people feel that commercialiindustriAl should pay the bill. • 441. Preliminary conversations, however, adentify congiArrence with the 442 . , need for improvemexit. p . . . . . -:., •, ,A1: ..':;. ., ;,•' * ;:,..384.• I4, * • . ...4.4 4 .4: t . ' 4: ..... 4. ■,,,,.4, ii..V. 4,,,- i,.....t. .,,, -, , •',,.. .4.::.. t.44'''4 ' • -, - ' - • . — ., „ “.. v ! Oite • ' ' OP I ...za.epk.. ..."44444 44 ' ' • r t 8.4' Potential Consistency of Proposal with (complete • when applicable: H . • • r • • tf, .a. Clean Air impl emen� ati on Plans r • `• . « 1 `. • , • i No conflict foreseen. • b. Noise Standards Q standards relating to noise, ! t :on issues have not been adoptled to our knowledge. • • c:. Water Quality Standar-ds--- �. x .�. .. • ^�Sn l��d l.� �q. da�7C?1(����G+Y�4�''�,y.JlRnwvl'„u�!1 �r'�,,,'��+�t, � \No c onf l 1 c t s — � ;:.,,,�, :,,,1:..;'r. k �, �',�5 ''• • _- .._ . lc . Y" u • r 11 11 rS,mil t'.t` F, f\.1• ' I •• .t;;;:,1 rC 1�y.... u. �.vfi.r'. r ' a R�irrri.F in.y C,:�ti;. ' r .7• i, .•M t.ir�t1 r+f a • W-. '"' is d Ji 2 4L1 Y• 3�+S'rr.re,Cr'0-p,,.:.M»".: . + - 4. I ff i. ,i,wet;",! ,• ?�'y `T AI 2..W,WT..� •riLi d ux ■ • !" y�}. i, n .c4,a.`r l t144.1: `.t. .uYia.w r" r C' !w x.. rf ni ' ( , 4:`,:".;*? ' Pt?, • :4'6 . w At1::,P �74"4+°:t:S.,0' � 4Y. . ' l + K r+ ' 4 t..4 • 1.'t M tilt t;*.Y 4rp a i4 4.,r „.,r•+a Aµ 1. ., , ,'''',, ,• •, . n 4 OJECT — P1-11:1E I t...: . . 1 2 .......... A tic F: A.Lt• 'PR . . . . t..c%c Air i 0%. ..., "NM A P Avena 1 K Vii Ii v d cv f V r W 0 W C W 15 W A •. 1 ,t. 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I. ' i__L-l'ail ) i 1 I 1 I bt._...1. 6..,..._,,L.,u....,,,,i...z....„-____J -I , .Jk j L L ". , fc' TAR 1 1[1Kri . L.,_,17,,10-ji ii 1, i . . . , ... • . , ,„„,.. . -,_ F. ' 1 " I , • , i .. 7 .......1_:iir, : 1 ;.-aa I 4.-„, , .. tl.-El 1„,...,, cit. —::::-n .....r. _ Ie.. CD ■ "11."".""k ' " 1 ..... s a _,0,- 1 °.1 En • .I . 1 - ■' '7 m .. 4, . *HI 9, , . . .. (--) 44k:k.- .4z-411 s „„.< • N ,. '--- -; • t...11;90=__Et • .0.fali 1 • 1 i ..1)VF—tkfrIT 9 .■ .. 1--1 , u. P tT7.,,,t? Ili:_'” [....7.L M=1-.7 1 ,....$7-' -"iv-TR ''' 3 r4 . \'') • tr..? 1 . ,p 1 5-1,., ' .1 1,, '... --/ . f,EJE.,... ,, ...: ti" !, ?..... .,aa^,t--6 Hi; k ;K: c , rn i [-!..,„ rirna......, - 1 ,„,....4 g...„..u........... <;.,..'' ,-,,- EA ' ' '''''" " =flilci 7.EEIEca,..._ir.,71 t t 1 '' 67-71m.-4-., [!. =1-11-_,.igitiut.,1, . oos.4 ■,,1‘7, --w /112MGZ.I ,'' 101--2 1 .. )'''''''''..' >1.-----jl ----r \ t 1.t i --- ,_....p. . v2rs*:. „ _ ...7. t..t.;,,,,,-.-,L. ,, i.., ‘ NE 0.E.ii,ARD lar',IP.;opo. b. .e. : v.. '-' irls,"', . r '‘'‘ --- „ .',..0 4,0• ti, 1 t 1--4 ,". -41 ,,,..,.4 ign_ , A. . ...1.....L ..L..„.A.1 ....,, , i . /. or. ,e, * '---- itt I ■,)1)-.. ,....jr,r2ifi ,) ,' Q1.. 1.1.1,0 pit!, , 4 ... - ,„st....Jlk<9jpi ,. —, L. ' .. " "It Iti ri,1, . .*..,,::A7r-A.,' • ,.." "-.H.E.,i1 or.,5 ' 1 ra Pill •,' t \ ' .:p '.. . '11 /2 :[1.35L3(.fl /0 A ,..a ,, , . 4.vo_ , / . i , ,0'" ),;•-•4*t all.---.141,at..0 „..,...".. ,.."--ii■.-„ '-',.,_t. , ,,,,.•‘"' " .. . ,.. A ..._ 0,(s) 6 " `g` v.' / ' - - ...!10`., 1° 0 .----•' .., • . ,...6).> -1 t, :—. C , . .. KW 6 1 .. .4 ---: / . 4, •-'0 Q '-.. 1 ,. ,,, ■......„ , , A) 1.— -----..— \\*]\ ! //1 1 ,,,....1 :4, , .,c7.—..),,, „,.. - L...1...J tbi 0 _...n..,,__, - : / C90t. I , 1 1 . EllliVi V/'i4* ';:"1>f.4 4 6..12-. ( 7 ‘+i ,i1 '"i . •L' :.:4' I 4 7.1h,,,"— • • i . , ..--,.., . ---' 4.---• 1 ,, i i 't 17 -It.%ar4, a. / 1 40 —1:- ,...__It._ ,„ „.....,..„,„/„.. ,....,.. _444 , . • i I, . , . ... 1]. 1 1”E:: ", ta , '.*.....1:' ,l, 1.• ',f••....,I ' i ii,e t -,7bEr.-..r i ...±„.....! t :.-02.%,, /oar RI , .': ■, 1,, 1.5 ,.[..od c.:. .... , ;,.icy j ...::, . ....,, L. 1 , , i \ • 0 ok t40, / 441 LL-It'idu.,1, ,,j , 4.-.;e C.,\ 1 ............____.../ i,,. . .„... .. ........f.._. . , , 1 ..,,i,.,,r„,,,....4 gi 1 , .. , .4, __ i t ...... 6- t ,./ ci ./ ...\ j ' I, 4......41ttri.:■.• Q I . - thi • [ NirbIl 641 I p••,,,.... .........- Alit, i k. 4, le e Ar,.,i, . 13.. 1..... . .ii. ........i.......r........._._ zr...._ f n)._:,..,..e.... Id 0 , 11 1 , . ) \\ I: . Y 11 ''''k,1■44i ..._._.51.......‘ 114L-IEWAYJ . f -***" ...., ""*.'"'"••■"2.. Wm 17 C 1 T 9 0 r 1 , I , imf.....■...... 44 . . . _ . . . .- . . - . . . . - • . ..- . 60` R/W 1:---- 1 , 30 ..1--.. • 3d L. !‘t-e' i5s - ..._1 14s i . I3s I • I- . . t I . . - , . ... S = 0.0227 6" ROW P . f t 1 a . 1 . — • I [ . 4 R/W \ . R/W t 1 1 - I,. CLASS "C" ASPHALTIC :CONCRETE . i t . , .... . 1. .---- - 2" CLASS "B" ASPHALTIC CONCRETE ' 2" 3/4"— 0" CRUSHED ROCK/GRAVEL I • , . 8" a" — 0" CRUSHED ROCK/GRAVEL . o . - - —0 - rt _ st..... ......., .......1.^ SCALE : 1#1 et-c'es CITY OF TIGARD LORViN BY : de s.ill. — - . DATE : STANDARDS - APRVD BY • . .. - TY P STREET SECTION .. , . , . • FOR SW 72nd AVE. IMPROVEMENT F A U EXHIBIT "C" That portion of land in Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, being more particu- larly described as follows: • Lots 1 and 2, VARNS ACRES, Washington County, Oregon, SAVE AND EXCEPT that portion of Lot 2 conveyed to the State of Oregon by deed recorded in Book 599, Page 93, Film Records of Washington County, Oregon , Ordinance No 76- • .,i Y�,,�.. +'' 1.•. �trj°'#0,1"1°9 J�,R ' '�,rl • fi to V ..� • ., •,i. {.�.,:v �-•�.'�'•. tJ r l;d ;`...• • y4ri" 10.#7 • tvisiemeassow • • . I a i a A'S i ..N « • 437 ra ., .. ':ts._ a 1, '+, 1y?.x • 7(.: .7... a °:°°.4.1r., ;07... .,. .... (09°7 .72''' mtdor ..„ - . /.'''''' ''''",,,,,.. *:;f4" ..to,s.,_,•-4 ?.,.‹,'„,.! ,-.. ,.; ,,. ,' . .. ', -..,- ,., . A, M { 0? 777.,"•<. . ‘ " r. , 41"64r.'ll'if""e'''I'It'leki4.•11,,,,Ae"O'''''''. ...- . , � c` ,.....,:,. DI.,..,. ..,, ....- ...... e......:3,,.,, ,,to...-------- :; ...,,,,., . . e-- ..‘ ,, .. .,. ' ` „ e 2 - ,. .. . , offt9,,,....(;;;00,... ..,--, i ra 1. ,y /� aI i , �, d N . ,.„7"a2 ":„.,...,d- 0 . . 0..0 c„,,., . .0.54-7„. 740„,,z7„,,,, idop,,..4.,,.. „_, .1,00.;7407,....., --- „ed.e."7 • 1 ......... , . 0 • �....- 2. 'Cl/.5 ., ,7r"ei-t-liteil.,k.,., ,,,:,,,,C4,-/----,e..",4:9'.- dam~ . , a"s'i- i lie? ,,,,•=a—, -40, -i. , ,,,i0 .0 ,„,,,.„,.„.._,.. . .....--... -- . ... „.„700, . ' r 7:•,' • -- .,. . . : _,,, .. . , ., r.w.ww.wW_e...p.o...w."r...... , • • • t. r^_._ - s n ......'s rY,#'"�,' Y K'.,}^r4�y„✓,M:x: u u 1,s.,e.%,N - 1V ^ r..- LL . , V- ''' f .,,. ,*...,r.".-,.4: ..« raw" T ' 12 ,.,,� , F.��':.N ,,wok#.a a +4.. . / ' . N ., ,...,Q............. .....0 • . ' :,4 i ` ^.µ� any, W ,, .Yn , A. �' .,e#; to a.1's +fir.. ..hk ' ' I., . JG�x, r try 1w. rp + �u t h'ri� + w ,Tat, iFi.,. „ , ' . ,t t any • , . +as lk„t '*h:a, . crwt d '!,:7,,}r=, a i,rtr.'M y y ' n S „qty; H. !F, k ,.... .R,, r:, , _ ' ;', , a, + a 4 T ''�. ''yCe.ti1 ., Ii st i ,. M } w. .' �c a +rc'x p ,_ y,I ''',� } - �.. ;A,. "".**': aaa' 1. # '*`''*l.8 Ih. fS x # GJ , T*1,, _^ ,g.' 4. . r,„1:• 't' T 0.•y I, w ' x :r,,,,_ �i yy-, W a4+ . ' 1 ' K1' 41 N 'C'7: ” , • • ■ '� • • . , • . • '' ..) , 0 , .., ( / y • , I . . C . . ,, .., .., i " , . .. . ,._ -, .,..., _- . .... _, , ,.„., ,__,......, ■ .i. , . '4 1 J 4 ." , r , .j (1r) 1,,i.::"\,1 . l) CC,) . .1'' ''• , • \,. 'kd\\ . . /,' , . '.. • , .. .., , . 1. '''. ;''' ' _ ,, ,., . :::,,,,, , ,.' :.:::: l', „:"...;,,,„:; ,.:.,, -I.-----. '..:,,,,,,,. ---.. ''' :1 • ... , . „ • . . ., , ,. 4'. ., . • a , . ., . . ;0471: ............; It . ■ 'It J:':■V'''''. '''''C1'' 1 '' . ' ,. , ( , :,' *' , ,..,;:„..„. , 11111H- ' . I ' , •f ■ \\ l' i r (-; '--. , , --_, //1 ,i( , SCALE: 1'1, I . ") , DATE . , . ,(,) • . z / 9 • .•,:if. 4:4 . c*• , . • -01 "7" , ,, /, \.,,k , 0 0 Ifi,,, . 4'e"1,rz.P. w/ R1W, W. MCITY OF 9 .., i' r (.1, , faut-7,c.4 F• 5- op"' 19'3 cpt V/ S 00 73 A A . ' ' 0 • • ' "'""'''''''''"":' "4"11"'"0"""'"u"'""`"" . ..., _., D #c° %.4' I IS.00 ■ ' II . .., 35 7-, 1 1 .0 cm' 110,00 I as.00 , ... ' cl, 4 . . 0 • , . • , " • ,. 0' ...._. _ 1.00...... ............. S •••••••••••••••■ ......... 11=1.0010.1.. ....... .......... 0070.0..0 .......01=. ........ ......... ............... ....c. 1.0.0.0.0, ........ • ............, ......... 011....... ........... .......,,,,,,,1 "..- e . . ... - , . . -?<, L., .....4..„ . . .„-- . .,.. , . ,..„:„ . .it,..., . , • z . r..1) • - I , ill , 1 I. • . ••■1 .... . , ./' ,,,,,, In l'. • • •• . ww • • ,\\ • . ' N 0 1 . .4> . S . . ..., V ''''' or.5 :1. • . ;'CO - , , CO r , . 1 ° • 141..'',' tts9 0 . 8 :, • , q ,, . 7 6 01, : 5 Lu 0 ,.: co • Do 1 c.) E 0, ao c)G7 c13 o I 5, . 2. ,S2.8 It t- ,',.,•,' .. .,. . 1 . . 0 , V) -- .i..Q. : 0 . .1 1 9 . 0,• 0 c2p. I . , . CO Q o Q . C i, • n ,.. • . • 1 . zo, !-11-tG di • . 1 oN yi. 1 / •1 . 1 Q °\ !,,,, tv) co , /4,, 4-? • . 1 . . . co ......„. . 1 , 1 7" •.,< . s _ - . memo. ci) • N .0').' r IS 4 I , . 0 (f) A';:., .1.- :- , 011■111 ■ , , 0 I ..\.. c) (0 <)C.C)H ai 0 ciaL,E ,,,, • 9 . 0-,) 00 4%,• ?•-). •• t'...:, ' • ..... • 0 0 0 1 O. 0 0 2.•C.•.3 G• .. , . '6%. ., '---- - ,.. . .0 c"." • I . • ' 42! "Uir. ' .3G , 6.•,‘ 0.'e.' . 0 ., ,.. ,..-____9 ,• ,•..,• , • , , 0-6,-: , . ----,:„ . .,. • .,_ , • • — (.9 ...A ,t>+ ' 40 . . . e • I 0 °°' ,4"' ,'. . (..,9 , , . , , , • ' I ' ' .. . .._,....,,F„...,-...„.•„•„..„.„.•„,____._____________.......... -......„_.••_I.,.:2,.........-„,............_./ •••••..„.._.• . _.. .,.., .......,.• _41 „..„ ,..,,,•,......, ...„..........„.......,,,.,t).:, .),. . ..,., ,... •,,,,,..,, • ,„,., I ''"----'''''''''''" --"."--------*•'"'"%lit ...._.,,,_,....---.......„._ __ //,-,..-,..x..—,,,,-.....,...,...z. .,:,i'.:::',:".i..7.:Tr27„:."1:' . • , li•-) -0 0'112.`00'L t. ' '''-'i's Li.,9.9'"" '7'4" — — - a.. --e) 1.8. • • 0 ' - ' , ... ., • . .• ., •. „ is,, '' s' . •-. '''' . ,. • ' . ,„. /6 ....., /I . . , , . . , • ,. . 1 '• t!„.'V' " Li a .. •-410 ' .‘ .C) F--t-'1' . ' • •: 2r IA A ,0-57 ,. 78„oo . .8-() 'ss\s_c3 .-N Vi i. , _....i (0,,.. . 1 .s.,4 •1 , „ , . „,...\ ° C031". • 'a4e7 : • Wit ' 0 .. <:, 1 • 6ir tk.\ 4 ,,0 ..i • .., , ,..„ .- CI tui - . m '44 . . . . ‘ . ,>.H ' 00 of .: •15-1/4 1 • , • -71-j- , 2..0,79 ::, CO. . . ' • .. . . ., , I S 1 ,8 1 . • ,•:, . ti 't,`i-,. '.. ',,'.., '' . ''Y . . • i , ;,,,,,,,-- . I-.I).- I , • . , • . . n . ' • . . , . 1 211i • ' i 0 . • Vu .,1) ' -6\J i... . . . .. ,,, 0° .;'1'iikg,tfi nai as,03 0 rt) .. .. 0 . , f1 <'. .\\. , . , . • • ' . -to 0 - . W . . i: , ' 0 1 . • ... , _- ''''- ' '„ 0 • - ' 0 . , •. p\.. , . 0 ,f, 03 . 0 IN 0 t_i_ , . r... .,, ,,, . i . ' , i 0.'.., , 1•_.)-oo`'.-12'0Q'-,E isr_5..,--ia' ..„..::. , . , Oki . rn i ,, . \I , , , 4, ' • ON, tx 0 ) 0 , • , . „•,. ....... /1 11 CO lE {° . I' , • \ 4 • ,.• ''''''4. I( . ....,„ • ... , p i • . .,•••;:. 11 ,;11 •R s3. • , o , .--4- cr, I 4 • ,, .. tu-ill N li ....r• i ..-, --3j.,... ,, , .b,,,. h 2. ; H.', • , I, ... or. . . ..4k•ak....•- . • ' - • .; ,-... il ,-.7mv_ta.,-,.,V.V.,a,6,1=1.7.7 r.,...artt.....f..or-.,...........rg,ft.1..-.1.47,,,,',.-17....."1=0=.4,14:.,,,,,■;......,-.7.... -- ...,,,,-7-,.......- .,....e...... . -.. :, , .,........ , .......orooto, .......,,tia.t.,r414, ert.1=af,SV7strro.G.-0.- 47. , __________...........................a ....7- ...qt, ,..,....L.,... ....0_ .....„... . ,......t..„,..„_,,,4 - 1 •'I:- 1 0 . . • .• (....) i‘...)-00 42. 00-e. 19,0.H , , . ,,,. -.' , -i 1 1 .. e ,. , , „ ;' 7 0 ' ' : ir i ec 1. ' . ,. . • . , , ...; u I o , ,.. lg U.1 • , . .. ‘• lai . • ' , 1'4: i L.L., i) , ti I , . z ut 1 ,,,i, • .:,. : ,- ,--, . - ., 1, 4.. . -- I , . .• L. '1'3 9 a 16 fri-)1,4v.1—r-i A‘rr 0 ull -.#1 , 1., in ', ', HA,V E ,4.C.CMSS OM i4)0TH II- 11 . -,, '• .-, . k . ., , . - ,s. a i, es3a 41 s-rkoz-rs, B,L17,311 .0E LIF,5_175 rti . " , ., -nz.AFFkc...• ta.m.-t- a, , , f,, — .. 0\.. \. 1 , ., , - . — cp.. . , f; - ,..'. ,. , ill ILI ' , 1 i ..[,.. It A , "---,-.--.., .,.. ,. .it ; v1.(,).,,, „,,,,0 , . „„. ,, . .,, , - , 0 , , , ,,) • , ., ,1,.. - t . ,. .,',A, -- -....,....•1/49 . • 1 , „ (.1' , I ,..\ (u.), . ›.-0 Z ',10 ,,, CO 0 0 , I 1 • '• \6 1'” .'OP . 01 . a.,, I -1 it, tr 0 ' L, 4. , . CO '.2 A ‘.......,f_ , 1 . , - 1 , e.0 7L4 7 It ) - A A s,..„...--4i0 s. 'le I . , • - --,i • .. ,c,„..„ .. ••. . a .' 0 , . ul • ..7- r,,,,,' /A- v.\ • . 7 -.• , . t\J rk) -. • ...;.... ) ,.,--- , 7 i '.• , C) • . ,, . .(:),, 0' t31 •. ' ' ' A . /./A '7- ' ':>0 1 ■H " 57.) ACCE ZS ,, • , Ut : 7/;4-1 L .--d-vci : ' ' , . -,„,-/ ›. , , ,. ---.... , w ,„ 0 i . ,, , 1 . ,.,,, 4.1 \,. 0 , • . .......:._ - , 7e, - —••,. , 1 . , , ',•-,5°. ,v t.-/9‘..) \-#3• , 1....., , • I 0° KJ-.00°1-12.100.-E_ 1.SS.01 'I 2 • 2 oo° LE.oo-E t GS.01 ' 1 , , ,,,,. • - , -3 e# S.• P `., '‘-,> vdt - )- 00 1-12.a00.!- 1: 'I SG.00 ' liz#:.5°. 0,11 11 , t . ,,,... , I. * - T. • 1,1-..-' ".t• \:` 0.\ • C ,‘.9, -4(-›*-- # • , . . l' , • • . --ts.00- , - . . 40 ....1-1 ,..,,,, coy . ( . . , ,. .s., :14— 2a- 41, ' AO . . .4),, . i ' s , 1,--fil 29-5-o HQ' * .•;•-2. A,..3 a9.50.. -V( . 1 s., 0,.., • 1 ' 1,- . , • ... co /0}- °.„ .. ...• 25, g \ ,,_\ tt • '-'' ' • + ■C.'s `,3' ■1'9."0. . as 1 . 14,..r.I/T 1 L1TY SI-Okri k 4 V IZ= / ;, <, , . • . . , . 38.50 38,,50 R..*:"10 f ,.z.,' ',,:, '''''s•-' • , ,, • 46'-'90. • . LI= 7,0(') p RAI NAGE Q' I D , I . . et 1 • w AY ES PI'T 4 PED E ST RV\ ‘y4) • . rs ,, . . . ,. \, 11 . . cs- ,e.. . Q ,...... , . 0 (,) „, c"- . , • . ..ia .•I . . I . re' If, : 0 . . 0 • . . , . 1 1 2 . . . (r) . . . 11) 1 3 ilium, I 2 .• 2:B,Iso co w ,,,, , z N . , 1 ,29,03 ::. cJi ..•„ • a.3,H.97 ar , 0 E.B,77 41 ', '''' 0 ) :, 111 (I) 0, . - (Ct , • .11.1 :.., ,0, 19 > r_. , . . , ,. . • ,•-• . r.‘ ,, . • -. ' 0 tn , 0 al I, „ • I , 0 v 0 , ,i - 0 A „ 0 °a _ 0 2 11 0 .1 . , •, . 0 m ii m - 1, ' ,^ r. . 1 • ‘ . . fl ow) 0 v 0 0 • .' - Ilk 1 i h...)cpt,..)- Ac.E.s 00 I . _ . t,-...)°K..) - Act.-t.s..9..,, i o• 2 1 0 1 . - , 0 ' .., Irm--5:.....: :„..t.i.:... ......._, ........._ _ _. 0 , — • _ _ ................ _ ...„, _ y --.......,..... ...t.: ........-.. -..)........4 . I....)0 N)..ACC".'SZ• 001 . ‘,.t •t , •,, .„ 2 2 • ,,A,,', i e ' Z r:i 0'''' . . • it, . • )L4 o.9S' 0 c, .1--41% i '() ,.....o.a..___...0° • - o .. . - (r) 0 zi/S•38,5 0 38.So' .-..›. 440. 0 \, • 6hr -)0 I Li 8 ,....8...9_.-ri _ ...._ 1/41• • • I • . I 1 . • 201 DEDIC.A.'1110k3 . ' 0 2.0 DD)C.4),.-1-i0"-4K..)°-.°C)---: I* A.":9° ,, N . . 44 ---.--..— ----; , ...—„,....-.-..— 416, rwoo......./...........m.....wooma............... ,... ......, .......................0 .orsr f f 1 , ■ , , , I • 0 k E.X157, 20 RI\/./ . t • , , ;k 1 1 V , . i VI NI -,, , 1\1 3 e..8.50 72 n d AVE- •,1 - C.R. 472 .6 0 ac>-4 r• . . .. . , , -. . ....._ -, . , „ ,.,. %.) K.)- o.0 Li a a 0 E . c.,37H LI ' 0 NI ' N + , .... t ■ ..................... ......7 ".'"".".'.".. ' . e . 1 ' Z Ca' 76 t , i - . . I. Or "4 . , • ,y.• , , , . , . '1 . „ CJ . e . . • ... , . , . . „ .. 1 1,1N , , . I i , ‘e.-2 , ' , S.) ' ” 'y._.,'"•.•:....,--,*-:.;;;,,,,'; ,'.. '.-:' '......'r"..,•'...‘,,',,*•• . ' ' .,..,-■`, .' ' ! '-....",.--';...,., ..., ''.. ' '.-'...,0,, r.,,,,-.'------' ,,,'”,,,„';,•• ' .-*.44.-` P „t , ,.;,.-,,,,,A,,,": ,:,,,,,,,'.,,,...•:•:-..,«..-,',...4-4,-,,,•-.,-.. ...,.. _ .a-*-..•-,,- ,,,- -,-,,,,,„ ..--,.--' ••;:i4=4 -i• - ,-',..-''-'4,4=----:-:'.--..,,,--L.'"...-' --1"--'-'-'"' -7,,',.■,' 3,.....0,k -,,--..u... .,,. ' ,- -,- - -lee-.--- - .,- 17'7--,„f1:4010.'`','."''''.' i'''',,"„lit 111, ,'f. i f,i.i i ti iTtrilfq ii1 1 It I))itiiiift, 11 I / 11, i•il VI 9 11 IS I 1 1 1,I riki i 1 1,111 Si 11 I. 11.1 i 1 it I ill lilt)i 1,i 1 1,11 11,1 it 1 I gi i':„ , .,,.,,, . .,,, , .,,•,,,,,,;.i;,,,,,,,.„„,,,,, ,,, ,,,,,4_,,._,.,,,,. , , ,,.,,),1,.,:,•,,,,,,„,,,,,,r,,,,,,,i„,„,., ,,,,, 4-,,,,,,01441ittAtlir-l'ct -^..--"-".'------'''"'"'"''''''' "' • " , ,,i ÷ .. ,,.4.■ "-‘4! ; , ., ,,. itt ‘.1.111311 1,6 fie 1.1 II pp 1,41,011,11114 111,11111)Vil 1, , T if, It , ,,Ii. , , ,L, , ,, , , ,i, ,, , I , , , ; 1 , ; , ; „, I L . •,,, ' ".' ,,,, . ,), . .,, ..L,r,,,,„,.,,,„4,„, $ ' . 3' 6 7 0 ,13 1 I. ., ... 12,, ,,•,,„..,,, r,.,„,.- ..,....„........„..„......,..,.,,,:. ,....t.,1..,,,....-.' , , , . . 1 - No-rEt, 1-. THI8,m1cRor,tuvi.E:to , .-.,,,,,. .,,,,,,• ii ,,, . , . , ,,, If , DRAWING /8 LESS CLEAR THAN. i.I - ' - ' . . . , , i -,'i..,f, if , ,, . , THIS NOTIpE,r/T:18:,,DUE1-10 , i'. . . , 4 TH .,4„1,1ALITY OP THE' ORIGINAL i ,, 1/2 , ......-.--, - -- -• - ------------:--- -. . .. . • . .