The URL can be used to link to this page

PD1-85 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. . . ci•1 • JB BISHOP/MAIN ST.LAND PD 1-85 —MAIN St. & Pacific Hwy. &ZC5-85-- 4 , 2S1 2A0 1200, 1300 1400, 1500 1600, 2200, 23.00, 2301 &201 • , . .• r I , 4 .•. . w f ",, (i 4 /1'... p 0........„ /165. . ,. , I AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING 4, • r .STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) l' ' I, Cllr'e.e. LjOh , being first duly sworn, on oath depose and say: (Please Print) I ,. That 1 am a ic....ecoy-el for The City of Tigard, Oregon. N That I served notice of Final Decision for the Tigard City Council. of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each of the following named persons on the ) _ day of l98ST- , by mailing to each of them at the address shown on the att hed list (Marked Exhibit B) , said notice as hereto attached, deposited in the United States Mail on a. the / 2 day of , 198,c , postage prepaid. Ad n o . o/ L CO Ct,) • to ., 42,-1 .;.._ ((...a... 7//a.A..t...;1---1 1 ` 4 Person who delivered to POST OFFICE • Subscribed and sworn to before me on the ,. 1. day of Ott. , 198 i d 1 , 6.4...4.,14 i) t ,'µ,ti �,, n. NOTARY PUBLIC Off' OREGON w' My Coutrid 8 a ion expires t y1 ., P -°6e"? ! . 1 (0257P) ' 1, 4 • — \tir CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO 85-13 • A FINAL ORDER IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR A CONCEPTUAL PLAN APPROVAL• w AND ZONE CHANGE REQUESTED BY MAIN STREET LAND CORPORATION, FILE NO, PD 1--85 AND 7C 5-85, UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A CONCEPTUAL PLAN WITH MODIFICAIIONS AND REVISING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION ON THE ZONE CHANGE WITH MODIFICATIONS, ENTERING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, • • WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council heard the above application at its Regular Meeting of April 29, 1985 in a review of the Planning Commission action of April 2, 1985, The applicant was represented by Rob Ball, assisted by Dennis Brun, Grigsby Christopher, Christopher Freshly, and Wayne Kitt1cson T B, Bishop, representing Main Street Land Corp, was present, Appearing in opposition were Gloria 3ohnson, Emmett Whitaker, Dan Gott, Anita Edit,, and Gary Ott, representing NPO #1; and, The Council finds the following facts in this matter: • WHEREAS, the applicant, Main Street Development Corp, applied for Conceptual Plan approval for a 221,000 square foot retail center on a 20,3 • acre property and for a Zone Change from R-12 (PD) Residential, 12 Units/acre) to CBD (Central Business District) for a 3 ,10 acre parcel on the southeast side of Ash street, The e'emaihing property is zoned CM The property is located at the Southwest corner of Main Street and Pacific Highway (Wash, Co, /4 Tax Map 281 2CC, Tax Lot 1200, 1300, 1400, 1500, 1600, 2200, 2300, 2301, 201 55 ? and 2S1 208, 800) ; and, WHEREAS, on April 26, 1982, the City Council granted Preliminary and • General Plan approval as well as a sensitive Lands Permit for an earlier proposal for the Main Street project (COR 8-81, CPR 9-81, and M 2-81) , The proposal included approximately 16 acres of land and 174,000 gross square feet of building area, The Planning Commission granted an extension for this approval oh May 3, 1983. This extension for the preliminary plan approval has expired: and, WHEREAS, the Tigard Planning Commission conducted a hearing Oh this matter on April 2, 19854 The Commission voted to grant conceptual plan • approval of OD 1-85 subject to conditions and approval of ZC 5-85 subject to • conditions, The information supporting the applitant' s request, the record Of the hearing, and the final order of the Planning Commission are found in Planning Files Number PO 1-85 and ZC 5-85: and, WHEREAS, on April 0, 1985, the Council by motion, voted to call up the Planning CoMmisSion approval of 00 1-85 and iC 5-85 fo r a review of the record, A hearing date of April 29, 1985 was later scheduled; and, WHnLAS, the City Council had before it the record of the proceeding before the Planning COMmiSSioh, The matter was brought before the City Council under Section 18,82.310(b) and 10;12,126, The public hearing was held on April 29, 1005; and, OROTNANCE NO, - Page 1 . n : ,.. . . , . .. _ _. . _. C7 WHEREAS, the relevant approval criteria in this case for granting , i• conceptual plan approval are Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, • , 7, 8, and 9. Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 2, 1, 1, 3 ,2. 1, 3,2.2, 3 ,2.3, 3 .4.2, 3 .5,3, . ,, 5,1. 1, 5, 1.3, 6,3 ,3, 6.6. 1, 7.2.1, 8, 1,3, 11,2.1, 11,2,2 and 11.2,3; and . . - Community Development Code chapters 18466, 18,80, 18.84, and 18.100, • WHEREAS, the application complies with the following Statewide , Planning Goals and Guidelines: , . . 1, Goal 1/ 1 is met because the City has adopted a Citizens , , Involvement program including review of all development : applications by the Neighborhood Planning Organization (NP0) , . , In addition, all public notice requirements were met, , ., 2, Goal # 2 is met because the City applied all applicable . , Statewide Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan Policies and , Development code requiremehts to the application, , - , . 3 Goals # 5 and II 7 will. be addressed during the Sensitive Lands , o. --.... ,, . review of the project, \ . 4, Goal H 8 is satisfied because the site plan is compatible With , . . the ranno Creek Park Plan, The Park Board has reviewed the . . proposal and no objections were raised, . 5, Goal # 9 is satisfied because the development will have a . positive economic impact upon the downtown area; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposal, with several modific o ations, is consistent with the relevant portions of th . . e Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted below i i, Plan Policy 2,1,1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood . , Planning Organi ah tation d surrouhding property owners were ' given motice of the hearing and opportunity to comment oh the . applicant's proposal, 2, Plat, Policies 3 ,2,1, 3 ,2,2, 3 ,2,3, 3,4,2, 3,5,3, and 7,2,1 , . shall be reviewed as part of the Sentitive Lands perffiit 1• process, 3, Plan Policies 5,1,i, and 5,1,8 are satisfied because this .. , commercial center will have a positive affect upon the local job market and it will tontribute towards establishihg the 1 downtown ag the viable core area for the community, , Tho largest building ih the commercial tenter would consist of approximately 105,000 square feet. If it is occupied by cogtto, ag proposed by the applitant, approximately i60 jabs would be treated by that facility alone, The remainder of the 4 project will create a substantial number of additional jobs in the City, OROINANCL NO, 25-28 - Page 2 •. , . h ■ y;, c ( 4 4, Plan Policy 6.3.3 is not completely satisfied because the • downtown is considered to be an "Established Area" and development occurring within the area is intended to preserve and enhance the character of these areas. The proposed site plan does not provide sufficient setbacks and/or buffering ..) ad,;,cent to some of the existing residential uses and therefore the project would have a detrimental impact upon these properties, 5, Plan Policy 6,6,1 is not satisfied because the buffering shown on the site plan between the commercial structures and some adjacent residential buildings is inadequate. Modifications to correct this deficiency are noted below, 6, Plan Policy 8143 will be satisfied during the detailed plan and constructed phases of the development, 7, Plan Policies 11,2,1, 11,2,2 and 11,2,3 are satisfied because . the site plan includes the extension of Ash Street to the M eastern boundary of the project and a temporary barricade will be installed near Hill Street, This obstruction will be removed in accordance with Policy 11,2.3. 8 , The major building will be used for retail. However, the building's proposed appearance will be that of the largest industrial building in Tigard, appropriate buffering is !, necessary to protect the adjacent neighborhood, ;' 3' 9, Landscaping and buffering are important features of the Project, as such, they must be installed and maintained in a manner which meets the intent of the code to provide protection throughout the life of the project, Sn ti 10, All improvements described in Phase T must be made in accordance with modified conceptual site plan submitted at the • April 29, 1q85 hearing prior to occupancy of any buildings; and, 1t, The applicant proposes to dedicate approximately 1,2 acres of , Tax Lot 300 to the City for park purposes, The park land will be an important addition to the City's inventory of parks and open space in the "backbone or the City' s 00h-spade system" as described in Plan Policy 3,5,3, • WNnFAS, the City Council concludes that with the modifications the r. . . al, • , portions , ' w , noted, proposal satisfies the relevant p � " � of the Community Development Code based upon the findings listed below; 1. Chapter 18.66 (cut) 'one) of the Code 4s satisfied because the proposal meets the minimum standards relating to setbacks, lot coverage, and building height, z. Chapter 148.30 (Planned tjeveiopment) of the Code is satisfied except for Section 18,80,1i0 (c)(3) and 0,80,120 ( W(3) . The olm:xNANCF NO. 85-28 , Page 3 • staff understands that extensive grading will be necessary on : the site, but a generalized grading concept has not been submitted, The grading proposed in the flood plain may be I reviewed during the Sensitive Lands review, The land form )0 , alteration to be done on the remainder of the site is critical For conceptual review in order to determine the relationship between the new commercial buildings and the residences to the south and west, Section 18.80,120 (a) (3) is not satisfied because ih some , cases insufficient landscaping or visual buffering is shown between the commercial buildings and nearby residential uses, Of particular concern are visual impact and the noise from loading areas and building ventilation systems, Additional information must be submitted to illustrate how these negative impacts will be mitigated, The conditions of development include steps which the applicant must take to comply with code requirements. The site contains several large fir trees and one significant cluster oF trees on the western boundary of the project near Pacific Village Apartments, Section 18,80, 120 (a) (3) of the fl Code requires that trees with a six inch caliper or greater be saved whenever possible, The proposed site plan indicates that all existing trees will be removed, The plan should be revised to save as many of these larger trees as possible, This is particularly true of the trees along the western boundary of the project because of their usefulness as a landscaped buffer, „ 3, Chapter 18.84 (Sensitive Lands) of the Code will be satisfied• during the Sensitive Lands review process with the Hearings Officer, It should be noted that it is possible that the site plan will need minor revision as a result of this review, 4, Chapter 18./00 (Landscaping and screening) of the Code is 15 foot wide except for a thirty foot set—back which is required where the property abuts the Pacific Village Apartments; and, The following additional findings have been made by the City Council, (( : 6, The applicant has proposed to realign the right of way for Ash Avenue adjacent to the site in order to create some curvature of the street, The proposed curvature will be aesthetically pleasing and conducive to maintaimihg slow traffic speeds which will be compatible with the residential neighborhood, 6, The applicant has presented a conceptual site plan which has modified a from the conceptual site plan approved by the Plahhihg Commissi0h, The modified plan would eliminate the • creation of a roadway through the site connecting Ash Avenue with Maih street and Pacific Highway. No plan polity ow provibion of the Oevelopmeht Code requires such a roadway to go through the properiy. The modified plan submitted by the OROINANCL NO, 85-28 — Oage 4 . . -_ ,......,..„,,„,,,........„ . . . ' 5 . ' 0 ' , , (—I' . i • . , . applicant is preferable to the plan approved by the Planning . Commission because it would help to insulate the residential . neighborhood east and south of the property from commercial . traffic from the subject property and from the central , business district. Adequate alternative accesses from Ash A Avenue to Pacific Highway already exist on Burnham, Frowing, ,g Garrett and McDonald streets, among others, •.. , 7. In 1982, the City reviewed and approved a site plan For the . subject property, and approved a traffic analysis conducted by CH2M Hill in March 1982, The evidence indicates that the traffic volum a es and traffic-related impacts of the proposed . . , development will not be significantly different from that • approved in 1982. It is estimated that, upon full build-out, . . . the development will generate approximately 11,200 one-way vehicle trip-ends on a daily basis, and 1,060 p,m, peak hour . vehicle trip ends, The surrounding street system has adequate capacity for this traffic, , ., . WHEREAS, the Council concludes that the relevant criteria for . . granting a Zone Change for Tax Lot 300 on the southeast side of Ash Street are . Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2 and Section 18,66,030 of the CoMmunity Development Code; and, ' •. WHEREAS, the City Council concludes that the proposal is consistent , . with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines based upon the ... findings below: 1, Goal II 1 is net because the City has adopted a Citizens •. Involvement program including review of all development • applications by the Neighborhood Planning Organzation (iJ150) , • In addition, all public notice requirements were 2. Goal # 2 is met because the City applied all applicable ', . . - Statewide Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan Policies and . ' Development code requirements to the application; and, -, WHB:REAS, the City Council concludes that the proposal is not • ( . .... consistent with the applicable standards in the Community Development Code as set out below a Section 18.66.030 of the Code indicates that the subject . property as well as the other nearby parcels zoned R-12 (Pb) t shall be developed in accordance with the provisions of the k-12 zone, A rezoning to CBD would conflict with the intent ' of this provision of the code: and, WHEREAS, the City Council determined that the zone change requested was inappropriate, and, i WHEREAS, the City CoUncil found that the parcel of land west of the proposed Ash AVOhLie right-of-way realignment which was zoned R-12 as depicted , .. on the modified site plan submitted by the applicant should be zoned COO: and, , . . 4 OROVVANM NO, 8548 - Pao 5 , 0 . ,.�. It WHEREAS, the City Council found that it was appropriate to place a Pt) designation on that portion of Tax Lot 300, as well as Tax IY..ot 2300 and 2301 of the modified site that is zoned CEll) and rezone that portion of the modified site on the west side of SW Ash Avenue proposed right—of-way to The City of Tigard Ordains as follows; SECTION 1: The City Council upheld the Planning Commission approval of the conceptual plan review with modification, and the following conditions; • 1, The modified site plan submitted at the City Council meeting ' • of April 29,1985, is acceptable subject to the conditions which follow; 2, The project will be built in phases as described by the applicant and shown on plans submitted at the April 29 hearing, • 3 , Phase I shall include the retail building, all parking lots and parking lot landscaping proposed in Phase T, all ingress 'r and egress from the project, all improvements bordering the greenway, all bikepaths and pedestrian paths, all improvements to Ash Avenue as re—routed, and grading of land included in Phases II and III, A finalized landscape plan shall be submitted which guarantees the proper installations of the landscaping materials and the perpetual maintenance of all / , landscaping, Such maintenance shall include regular scheduled pruning and feeding of materials. The retail building which is included in Phase I shall be set back 50 feet from the south property line of the development i as it adjoins the existing residential, neighborhood, 5, A Pt) designation is placed on Tax Lots 2300, 2301, and that portion of Tax Lot 300 which will be west of the realigned right—of—way of Ash Avenue, 6, The shopping center will be built with temporary access to Ash Avenue to allow residents of the Philadelphia Square ,1 Apartments to exit through the site to Ash Avenue, Upon completion of Phase I and improvements to Ash Avenue, the • barrier on Ash Avenue, erected in compliance with policy 1122 wi/.l be removed, as required ih policy 111243(e) 4 At that time, hO through, traffic from the shopping area to Ash Avenue will be allowed, as a barrier will be constructed by the applicant at the location of the temporary access, i'' 7. There will be no public streets within the slopping center, '. • • 3, No parking lot for commercial Use will be constructed oh tax lot 300 east of the S.W. Ash Avenue realighmeht, OPt)XNANt NO. 8q:-23 — Page 6 i 1 .. , .w..' .. -.. ... mow.,.w..,.. ..-.s ...a i ._ Y w.• r 0 . 9, Dedication of necessary right—of—way is required so that the applicant can build Ash Avenue, The dedication shall take place in conjunction with street vacation processing at the . 6 applicant' s expense, 10, Conceptual plan approval is subject to staff review of traffic 6, study information submitted at the April 29 hearing, • 11 , The park land shown on the plan, including greenway/floodway areas, shall be dedicated to the City as part of Phase 1, 12, A thirty foot setback along the south property line will be maintained as it adjoins the R-12 zone, 13 , All subsidiary applications, documents, and fees shall be filed with the City, including, but not limited to street vacation, sensitive lands, detailed plan review, 144 Staff conditions from the April 2, 1985 staff report, items 1-4, must be complied With as follows; Sensitive Lands approval will be required for all grading and improvements within the 100 year flood plain, A Sensitive Lands approval shall be obtained •, prior to final approval of the Detailed Plan submitted for review, A detailed plan shall' be submitted to the Planning Director for approval that is in conformance with the requirements in 18,80 of the Code, In addition, said plan shall include the following information or modifications; a, Buffering and screening consistent with Section 18,804120(a) (3) (B) and Chapter 18,100 of the Code. b. Identification and location of noise sources within the western portion of the project and a method for shielding adjoining residences froM excessive noise impacts, c, The landscaping plan for t i development shall • preserve as many trees over six inch caliper on the site as practical. Specific conditions relating to public improvements shall be applied upon Detailed Plan approVal, This approval is valid if exercised within ono year of the final decision date. 15. The grading of the entire site, including the area within the 10-year flood plain, shall be reviewed by the Park tioard, • The location of the pedestrian/bicycle path shall also be reviewed by the Park board prior to final, approval of a design, ORDINANCt.17 NO, - Page 7 / . (:- � . SECTI0N �; In Order to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Tigard, it is necessary to adopt this Final order declaring the Council's conditions upon the Main Street Development Corp, requests without delay, an emergency is � hereby declared to exist and this Ordinance shall become [� effective upon its passage by the Council and approval by the ' �\ Mayor. PASSED: By unanimous vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only this 13th day of May, 1985. , ; / �. �~ 7� , •- Deputy City Recorder — City of Tigard ' � | . ` | APPROVED'. This 16th day of May, 1985. .' ' �0r � � `. � ' aor ~ City of Tigard —~-- ` ^ | ' .. , ' . .. ` • 1w/1338P . ` . � . ( ` ^ • • \ � ORDINANCE NO. 85~23 ~ Pa�� 8 - / �.�� . ' ti • � y CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 35- A FINAL ORDER IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR A CONCEPTUAL PLAN APPROVAL AND LONE CHANGE REQUESTED BY MAIN STREET LAND CORPORATION, FILE NO. PD 1-85 AND ZC 5-85, UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A CONCEPTUAL PLAN WITH MODIFICATIONS AND REVISING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION ON THE ZONE CHANGE WITH MODIFICATIONS, ENTERING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council heard the above application at it's Regular Meeting of April 29, 1985 in a review of the Planning Commission action of April 2, 1985. The applicant was represented by Rob Ball, assisted by Dennis Brun, Grigsby Christopher, Christopher Freshly, and Wayne Kittleson. J. B. Bishop, representing Main Street Land Corp, was present: Appearing in opposition were Gloria Johnson, Emmett Whitaker, Dan Gott, Anita Edin, and Gary Ott, representing NPO 1#1; and, The Council finds the following facts in this matter; WHEREAS, the applicant, Main Street Development Corp. , applied for Conceptual Plan approval for a 221,000 square foot retail center on a 20;3 acre property and for a Zone Change from R-12 (PD) Residential, 12 units/acre) to COD (Central Business District) for a 3,19 acre parcel on the southeast side of Ash Street, The remaining property is zoned CBD, The property is located at the Southwest corner of Main Street and Pacific Highway (Wash, Co, Tax Map 2S1 2CC, Tax Lot 1200, 1300, 1400, 1500, 1600, 2200, 2300, 2301, 201 and 2S1 2DB, 300); and, WHEREAS, on April 26, 1982, the City Council granted Preliminary and u General Plan approval as well as a Sensitive Lands Permit for an earlier proposal for the Main Street project (CPR 8-81, CPR 9-81, and M 2-81), The proposal included approximately 16 acres of land and 174,000 gross square feet of building area, The Planning Commissio granted an extensio for this tea° -fk� f ',;,�h "��a►,� ��IwH wtell�Jr, approval on May 3, 1983. This extensionAhas expired; and WHEREAS, the Tigard Planning Commission conducted a hearing on this matter on April 2, 1985, The Commission voted to grant conceptual plan approval of PD 1 =85 subject to conditions and approval of 2C 5- 85 subject to conditions, The information supporting the applicant's request, the record of the hearing, and the final order of the Planning Commission are found in Planning Files Number Pb 1-85 and ZC 5-85; and, WHEREAS, on April 8, 1985, the Council by motion, voted to call Up the Planning Commission approval of PD 1-85 and ZC 5-85 for a review of the record, A hearing date of April 29, 1985 was later scheduled; and, WHEREAS, the Cit y Council had before it the record of the proceeding before the Planning ommi Sion, The C of fanning C s he matter was brought before the city CoUhcil under Section 18,32,310(b) and 18,32,320. The public hearing was held oh April 29, 1985: and, ORDNANCE NO, 8! - Page 1 V • r WHEREAS, the relevant approval criteria in this case for granting conceptual plan approval are Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 5, 7, 8, and 9. Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 2,1,1, 3.2.1, 3,2.2, 3,2.3, 3.4.2, 3.5.3, 5.1.1, 5,1.3, 6,3.3, 6.6.1, 7.2,1, 8.1.3, 11,2.1, 11,2.2 and 11.2.3; and Community Development Code chapters 18,66, 18.84, 18.84, and 18.140. WHEREAS, the application complies with the following Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines: 1. Goal # 1 is met because the City has adopted a Citizens Involvement program including review of all development ,:. applications by the Neighborhood Planning Organization (NP4), • In addition, all public notice requ i rem e nts were met, • 2. Goal # 2 is met because the City applied all applicable Statewide Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan Policies and i Development code requirements to the application. 3, Goals # 5 and # 7 will be addressed during the Sensitive Lands rev ie-'w of the project, 1 ,1 4, Goal # 8 is satisfied because the site plan is compatible with the Fanno Creek Park Plan. The Park Board has reviewed the i ;, proposal and no objections were raised, • 5, Goal # 9 is satisfied because the development will have a positive economic impact upon the downtown area and, WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposal, with, several modifications, is consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted below: 1a Plan Policy 2,1,1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and opportunity to comment on the applicant's proposal, 2, Plan Policies 3,2,1, 3,2,2, 3,2,3, 3,4,2, 3,5;3, and 7.2,i shall be reviewed as part of the Sensitive Lands permit process, 3, Plan Policies 5,1,1, and 5,1,3 are satisfied because this commercial center will have a positive affect upon the local job market and it will contribute towards establishing the • downtown as the viable core area for the community, vA/z,b4^-k( 1) ORDINANCE NO, 35- Page 2 i 4 H .` Q. Plan Policy 6.3.3 is not completely satisfied because the } downtown is considered to be an "established Area" and. development occuring within the area is intended to preserve and enhance the character of these areas. The proposed site plan does not provide sufficient setbacks and/or buffering adjacent to some of the existing residential uses and therefore the project would have a detrimental impact upon these properties. e. 5. Plan Policy 6.6.1 is not satisfied because the buffering shown on the site plan between the commercial structures and some adjacent residential buildings is inadequate. Modifications to correct this deficiency are noted below. 6. Plan Policy 8,1.3 will be satisfied during the detailed plan and constructed phases of the development. 7. Plan Policies 11,2,1, 11.2.2 and 11.2.3 are satisfied because the site plan includes the extension of Ash Street to the eastern boundary of the project and a temporary barricade will be installed near Hill Street. This obstruction will be removed in accordance with Policy 11,2;3. 8. The major building will be used for retail, However, the building's proposed appearance will be that of the largest industrial building in Tigard, appropriate buffering is necessary to protect the adjacent neighborhood, 9, Landscaping and buffering are important features of the project, as such, they must be installed and maintained in a manner which meets the intent of the code to provide protection throughout the life of the project. sv,.b,l2t.I L4/4 10. All improvements described 'h tPha a I. . must be made in ;;' accordance with su ^ r�or"o' occupancy of any I ( buildings; and, 14:-61 WHEREAS, the City Council concludes that with the modifications Noted, the proposal satisfies the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon the findings listed below; 1, Chapter 18,66 (CBI) Zone) of the Code is satisfied because the proposal meats the minimum standards relating to setbacks, lot • coverage, aid building height, 2, excei. fo��Section 18,80,11 c 3 ) and 1880 Code�0 is satisfied Chapter (Planned Development) p� O� O(3), The extensive grading will be necessary on the staff site,understands but a that g eneralied grading concep. i has not been submitted, The grading proposed ih the flood plain may be reviewed during the Sensitive Lands review, The land form alteration to be done on the remainder of the site is critical for conceptual reine w in order t o determine the relationship between the new commercial buildings and the residences to the south and west, b btNANC No, 05— — Page 3 0 Section 18,80, 120 (a) (3) is not satisfied because in some cases insufficient landscaping or visual buffering is shown between the commercial buildings and nearby residential uses. Of particular concern are visual impact and the noise from loading areas and building ventilation systems, Additional information must be submitted to illustrate how these negative impacts will be mitigated; The conditions of development include steps which the applicant must take to comply with code requirements. The site contains several large fir trees and one significant cluster of trees on the western boundary of the project near t ` i . Pacific Village Apartments, Section 18,80.120 (a) (3) of the Code requires that trees with a six inch caliper or greater be : b saved whenever possible. The proposed site plan indicates that all existing trees will be removed. The plan should be revised to save as many of these larger trees as possible. ; M This is particularly true of the trees along the western boundary of the project because of their usefulness as a landscaped buffer, 3, Chapter 18,84 (Sensitive Lands) of the Code will be satisfied during the Sensitive Lands review process with the Hearings ' Officer, It should be noted that it is possible that the site plan will need minor revision as a result of this review. I 4, Chapter 18,100 (Landscaping and Screening) of the Code is 15 foot wide except for a thirty foot set—back which is required Pit 001, ) w47"7 where the property abuts the Pacific Village Apartments; and, TCLI *eio 65* 41,60.0-vv( •40' — g OA_ • v WHEREAS, the Council concludes that the relevant criteria for granting a Zoh+l Change for Tax Lot 300 on the southeast side of Ash Street are : Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2 and Section 18,66,030 of the Community beuelopmeht Code; and, WHEREAS, the City Council concludes that the proposal is consistent with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines based upon the findings below u. 1, Goal # 1 is met because the City has adopted a Cit ens Involvement program including review of all development applications by the Neighborhood P lanning Organization (100),In addition, all public notice requirements were met, , 2, Goal IE 2 is met because the City applied all applicable Statewide Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan Policies and Development code requirements to the application; and, WHE,REAS, the City Council concludes that the proposal is not consistent with the applicable standards ih the Community Development Code as set out below: • OPbtNANCE NO, 05— Page 4 , Section 18.66.030 of the Code indicates that the subject property as well as the other nearby parcels zoned R-12 (PD) shall be developed in accordance with the provisions of the R-12 zone. A rezoning to CBD would conflict with the intent of this provision of the code; and, WHEREAS, the •City Council determined that the zone change requested was inappropriate, and, WHEREAS, the City Council found that the parcel of land west of the proposed Ash Avenue right-of-way realignment which was zoned R-12 as depicted on the modified site plan submitted by the applicant should be zoned CBD; and, WHEREAS, the City Council Found that it was appropriate to place a PD designation on that portion of rax Lot 300 ataimaNWC as well as tax Lot 2300 and 2301 of the modified site that is zoned CBD and rezone that portion of the modified site on the west side of Si Ash Avenue proposed right-of-way to CBD-PD, ' The City of Tigard Ordains as follows SECTION it The City Council upheld the Planning Commission approval of the conceptual plan review with modification, and the following conditions: 1, The modified site plan submitted at the City Council meeting of April 29,1985, is acceptable subject to the conditions which follow 2, The project will be built in phases as described by the applicant and shown on plans submitted at the April 29 hearing, 34 aPhase I shall includ e the retail building, allp::k n lots ly hdpark hglotland s capihgiThgrt;9ndevefzm the project, all improvements bordering the greenway, all bikepaths and pedestrian paths, all improvements to Ash Avenue as re-routed, and grading of land included in Phases It and III, A finalized landscape plan shall be submitted which guarantees the proper installations of the landscaping erils and the perpetual maintenance of all landscaping, Such maintenance shall include regular scheduled pruning and feeding of materials, The retail building which is included ih Phase I shall be set back 50 feet from the south property line of the development as it adjoins the existing residential neighborhood, 5, A PD designation is plated or Tax Lots 300, 01, and that portion of tax Lot 300 at4m4,4M,Which will be west of the realisnged right-of-way of Ash Avenue, 6, The shopping center will be built with temporary access to Ash Avenue to alloW residents of the Philadelphia Square ()ROMANCE NO, 85- - Page 5 . r I • •u:t 1 ju/JAS ` F 4 Y M Apartments to exit through the site to Ash Avenue. Upon completion of Phase x and improvements to Ash Avenue., the barrier on Ash Avenue, erected in compliance with policy 11.2.2 will be removed, as required in policy 11.2.3(e) . At that ';time, no through traffic from the shopping area to Ash Avenue will be allowed, as a barrier will be constructed by the applicant at the location of the temporary access, 7. There will be no public streets within ti -raarea--IM° the • shopping center. lot be constructed s 8. No park in g east of the S.W. Ash Avenue realignment. 9, Dedication of necessary right-of--way is required so that the applicant can build Ash Avenue. The dedication shall talk place in conjunction with street vacation processing at the applicant's expense. 10. Conceptual plan approval is subject to staff review of traffic ,)(d study information stibmitted at the April 29 hearing, 6tP1'14i14) 11. The park land shown on the plan, including greenway/floodway ALA P P. Jr- areas, shall be dedicated to the City as part of Phase z: • 12. A thirty foot setback alon4 the south property line will be maintained as it adjoins the R-12 done, 13 , All subsidiary applications, documents, and fees shall be filed with the City, including, but not limited to street vacation, sensitive lands, detailed plan review. 14. Staff conditions from the April 2, 1985 staff • report, items 1--4, must be complied with as follows; -- Sensitive Lands approval will be required for all r grading and improvements within the 100 year flood . pla'LL A ishalbe obtained� , y Mss • the far reui.eW, (1144/t)11' ,1 C . - A detailed p lah shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval that is in conformance with the requirements in 18,00 of the Code, In addition, said plan shalt include the following information or modifications a, buffering and scr eemmhg consistent with section 18,80,120(a) (3) (b) and Chapter 10,100 of the Code, b. Identification and location of noise sou"rtes ` , of the project and a Wlthxh the Wester�i portion method for shielding adjoining residences from ekcessxVe note impacts, OROZNANs C 1110, 06- - Page 6 lummymmiimminimuminimiumnimmairmiimiimisimos r I I t,.. 4 t M, c. The landscaping plan for the development shall preserve as many trees over six inch caliper on • the site as practical, r _- Specific conditions relating to public improvements shall be applied upon Detailed Plan approval, This approval is valid if excercised within one year of the final decision date: 15. The grading of the entire site including the area within the 100--year flood plain, shall be reviewed by the Park Board, The location of the pedestrian/bicycle path shall also be reviewed by the Park Board prior to final approval of a designs The " etail d , l fop hi pr ct `VI. . r,� " t * r i''w ty-/cou 6,i1'-f,4 6t4L/g-�,.st rf c v idw' rrei "', L e ommeh a ions, .r-'. SECTION 2: In Order to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Tigard, it is necessary to adopt this final .�. , order declaring the Council's conditions upon the Main Street Development Corp. requests Without delay, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Ordinance shall become effective upon its passage by the 'Council and approval by the Mayor, : +, PASSED; By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only this day of , 19854 , Deputy City Recorder — City of'Tigard APPROVED; This , day of , 1985. Mayor - City of Tigard , rI 1130P , . ,I ORDINANCE Af CE NO r 06— — Page / ,,,. .,..,. ,,, .,.,. .,.. „., ., .:,... ......ir.-,xr_,...v.,.,rwr-+„+.,<HnH r.o-u,«r,.y a'r,r., .. ,..,..;,a N'".+n.,:^r.vuro-xt ea,rn+'."«aw,r+rewrr—•*xr.mr r,.estauor.ao-uM,r,.w....ow,k4 .. .., w ,. ....+.ar..,.,.. .cY,.a JJ., .SfiJ. - w anirer, .rc,{ M wnu.r w.,.rrrrw»mw. t6 k!I ra;'',r r' "48 tl . F3ALL, JAN & NOVACK ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE MAIN PLACE • 101 S.W. MAIN STREET ROBERT S, BALL PORTLAND,OREGON 97204 STEPHEN T. JANIK TELEPHONE(5O3)228--2525 KENNETH M, NOVACK TELECOPY (503)295-1058 OF COUNSEL • JACK L,ORCHARD TELEX 910-380-5470 JACOB TANZER rOHN W. LILJEGREN • SUSAN M.QUICK May 13, 1985 WILLIAM H. PERKINS CHRISTOPHER W. ANGIUS VICKI G. BAYLESS DENISE FRANCIS BARBARA W, RADLER MICHAEL C.WALCH Mayor and Members of City Council .� City of Tigard Tigard City Hall Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Main Street Land Corp , ; PD 1-85, 7C 5-85 Dear Mayor Cook and Councilors: In addition to oral comments and suggestions we will make with respect to the Planning and Development Staff ' s draft of a final order in these matters, we propose the following additions to the findings and conclusions : I. We propose adding the following language in Paragraph 3 on page 2 , dealing with Plan Policies 5.1. 1 and 5 .1. 3 : The largest building the commercial center would consist • of approximately square et . If it is occupied 4 by Costco, as proposed by the applicant, approximately 160 jobs would be created by that facility alone. The remainder of the project will create a substantial number of additional jobs in the city. 2 . We suggest adding a finding with respect to the greenway, as follows : The a P.. licant proposes to dedicate approximately 1. 2 acres of Tax Lot 300 to the City for park purposes: The park land wi be � P knan t en nl i. n de ti' bon a o t oh o es[in�v�yn o ry open-spade s sem n as described in p lan Policy n 5 3 . We ask that the following finding be added with respect to the alignment of Ash Avenue The applicant has proposed to realign the right of Way for to the site in Ash Avenue adjacent order to Create some curvature of the street. T proposed ro � .. p o s ed curvature Will be aesthetically pleasing and conducive to maintaining slow traffic speeds which Will be compatible with, the residential neighborhood. BALL, JAN I K & NOV%=+OK ' Mayor and Members of City Council City of Tigard May 13, 1985 Page Two 4 . We suggest adding the following finding: The applicant has presented a conceptual site plan which has been modified from the conceptual site plan approved by the Planning Commission. The modified plan would eliminate the creation of a roadway through the site connecting Ash Avenue with Main Street and Pacific Highway. No plan policy or provision of the Development Code requires such a roadway to go through the property. The modified plan submitted by the applicant is preferable to the plan approved by the Planning Commission because it would help to insulate the residential neighborhood east and south of the property from commercial traffic from the subject property and from the central business district. Adequate alternative accesses from Ash Avenue to Pacific Highway already exist on Burnham, Frewing, Garrett and McDonald streets, among others. 5. We ask that a finding with respect to traffic to be generated from the development be made as follows : In 1982, the City reviewed and approved a site plan for : .? the subject property, and approved a traffic analysis conducted by CH2M Hill in March 1982. The evidence indicates that the traffic volumes and traffic-related impacts of the proposed development will not be significantly different from that approved in 1982. It is estimated that, upon full build-obit, the development will generate approximately 11, 200 one-way vehicle trip-ends on a daily basis, and 1, 060 p.m. peak hour vehicle trip ends. The surrounding sti et system has adequate capacity for this traffic. 6 . We suggest adding a finding as to internal circulation and w parking as follows : The applicant has proposed angle parking along the access drive within the site leading to Main Street: The angle parking is not likely to have adverse effects on the inter-- ' section of Main Street and the access road to the site, for the following reasons. First, a 30--feet wide roadway • is provided efar two-way traffic flow. in the vicinity c inity of the proposed angle parking � Y comparison, a typical roadWay adw ay • width would be 24 feet) . Seco nd, angle parking is allowed on only one side of the roadway (in the inbound direction) . .. „ Finally, the angle parking is located approximately 220 feet away from the t 5S Drive intersection; Main Street-Acce i , this distance will allow for the storage of 9-11 vehicles without affecting the operation of the intersection. • i I f n ' .a ° F BALL, JAN I K & NOVACK '; •; Mayor and Members of City COuncil City of Tigard May 13, 1985 Page Three The evidence submitted to the Planning Commission and reviewed by the Council supports all of these additional findings . Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Robert S. Ball RSB/ew cc: Timothy Ramis,, Esq. Bill Monahan Bob Jean JB Bishop r•, • r I . . 0 CITY OFITGARIILIAggv COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: May 13,_ 1985 AGENDA ITEM #; 0•••••••■02am*...*•■■•• DATE SUBMITTED: _ny_24_121§ PREVIOUS ACTION: City Hearing_______ ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Main Street on April 29, TentatimApproAl______ Pevel2P2911± g2ra=inkSAL...11/milL PREPARED BY: William A. Monahan, REQUESTED BY gity..SELArlsil______ DEPARTMENT HEAD OR: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY.ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached is a final order prepared by staff, based upon the City Council's tentative approval of the Main Street Development Corps application for conceptual plan review of a planned development and a zone change, The Council tentatively approved the conceptual plan with modifications and • conditions, The zone change Was denied, except for a parcel of land which Will be created once the realignment of Ash Avenue is completed, ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1, Adopt the final order as written, „ 2, Modif9 the final order, SUGGESTED ACTION The Council should by motion, adopt the final order as written, , (br/11800) r7y • 1 6, fMAIN STREET LAND CORPORATION FINAL ORDER a. Attorney Ball presented a letter dated 5/13/85 which proposed additional findings and conclusions. He also addressed the applicant's concern regarding the 50 foot required set back for the large commercial building. He further requested Council consider dedication of the greenway to exclude that parcel zoned R-1Z as this would allow greater flexibility in developing that �. parcel later. t. b, Community Development Director suggested the following additions and modifications to the final order before adoption. o Page 1 -- 3rd 'Whereas' last sentence should read as follows: "This extension for the preliminary plan approval has expired; and,". a Page Z - 3rd 'Whereas' subsection 3 - add new paragraph at end of subsection 3 to read as follows: "The largest building in the commercial center would consist of approximately 109,000 square feet, If it is occupied by Costcb, as proposed by the applicant, approximately 160 jobs would be created by that facility alone. The remainder of the project will create a substantial number of additional jobs in the City ." a Page 4 -- amend subsection 10 to read as followst "All improvements described in Phase I must be made in accordance with modified conceptual site p lan sUbmitted tted at the April 29, 1935 hearing prior to occupancy of any buildings, and," d Page 4 .. subsection ohrbl to read as follows! "The applicant proposes to dedicate approximately 1,Z acres ,of Tax Lot 300 to the City for park purposes. The park land will be an important addition to the City's inventory of parks and open space in the "backbone of the City's open- space system" as described in Plan Policy 3 ,5,3 ," a Page 5 - After subsection 4 add the following: "The following additional findings have been made by they City Council, 1 '.. "5, the applicant has proposed to realign the right of way for Ash Avenue adjacent to the site in order to create some curvature Of the street,eet, The proposed curvature will be aesthetically pleasing and „conducive d maintaining slow traffic speeds Which will be compatible with the residential neighborhood, "6. The applicant has presented a conceptual site plan which has been modified from the conceptual site plan would eliminate the creation of a roadway approved by t' e Planning comtt�issioh, The modified plan , i , roadway through the fl.to cohnecting Ash AVONO with Maih Street and Pacific Highway, No plan . policy or tov�s provision the bevelba ne n t code require s uch a roadwa y to go through the property. Pag e 2 - COUNCIL NI MAY 11;, mrwp rctia,i - E� 1. i4 The modified plan submitted by the applicant is preferable ,• • - to the plan approved by the Planning Commission because it ... would help to insulate the residential neighborhood east >, and south of the property from commercial traffic from the subject property and from the central business district. f„ Adequate alternative accesses from Ash Avenue to Pacific Highway already exist on Burnham, Frewing, Garrett and McDonald streets, among others, "7. In 1982, the City reviewed and approved a site plan for the subject property, and approved a traffic analysis conducted by CH2M Hill in March 1982, the evidence indicates that the traffic volumes and traffic-related impacts of the proposed development wi • H G a Page 7 — Section 1, subsection 16 shall be deleted in its entirety , f c. Councilor Brian expressed concern regarding the proposed angle parking near the Main Street entrance to the site. Councilor Scott expressed the following concerns: Sidewalks should remain on the west side of Ash Avenue; No roof lines should be seen by the neighborhood to the south of the development; Park dedication is not neces§ary due to lack of City funds to maintain, d. Legal Counsel stated his interpretation of the Community Oevelrpment code would allow Council, to make additional requirements to the underlying zone and require a 50' setback along the commercial building, e, Community Development Director advised Council that staff will •. bring back a comp plan amendment to move the barrier on Ash Avenue to allow access to the residential neighborhood by the Philadelphia Square apartments, f, ORDINANCE NO, 85-23 A FINAL ORDER IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR A CONCEPTUAL PLAN APPROVAL AND ,,ZONE CHANCE • REQUESTED BY MAIN STREET LAND CORPORATION, ,,fF � D. w -8^S AND ZC 1 Vii,=-8�5� UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF CONCEPTUAL- - �PLAN WITH MODIFICATIONS AND REVISING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION ON THE ZONE CHANGE WITH MODIFICATIONS, ENTERING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, n � g. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards, to make the modifications and amendments as set out by the Community Development Director and adopt the amended ordinance Approved by unanimous vote of Council present, RECESS COUNCIL MEETING: 7:53 P.M. 7, LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING • 7,1 Roll Call: Present: Board Chairman John Cook; Board Members: Tom Brian, Jerry Edwards, and Ima Scott; City Staff; Bob Jean, City Administrator (arriving at 8:00 P,M.) Joy Martin, Administrative Assistant, Bill Monahan, Community Development Director; Tim Rami!s, Legal Counsel; and Loreen Wilson, Deputy City Recorder, 7,2. Civic Center Project - Prequalification appeal hearings There will be a denovo hearing for each appellant, Each hearing will be a full evidential hearing with appellants and respondents given an opportunity to give evidence and to cross-ekamine, a, Public Hearing Opened — Marion Construction Company, Inc, b,' Be� y ut Recorder re orted that Marion Construction Company withdrew their appeal on May 10, 1905 due to their current workload, They did express interest in bidding again for future City jobs, Page 4 — COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 18, 1985 4 Ak • C11YOFT1ARD WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON May 10, 1985 Mr. J. B. Bishop Main Street Land Corp, Suite 303 10505 SW Barbur Blvd, • Portland, OR 97219 Dear Mr. Bishop: We received the attached letter from Mr. Allison regarding storm water drainage. Please forward this letter to your engineer so the concerns eXpressed by Mr. Allison may be addressed as part of the detailed design for the Main Street project [ Sincerely, ' Keith S. Liden Associate Planner (kSL,bs/1347P) enclosure +---.--� 12755 SW ASH P.O.BOX 23397 11GARD,OREGON 97223 PHI 639-41 'i • 4tfolt,t70'1t.. . . CIWOFTARD . ••• WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON • • May 9 1985 Mr. Ken V. Allison ,' 6445 NE Union Avenue Portland, OR 97211 Y A Dear Mr. Allison: I have received your letter of May 16, 1985 regarding drainage for Pacific ' Village and Kings Choice Apartment. At this time, specific plans for accommondating drainage for the Main Street project have not been developed. I have forwarded a copy of your letter to our Engineering Division. M � • The drainage facilities will be identified and designed as a part of the detailed approval process. We will notify you when the detailed plans are submitted for review. • Sincerely, ,,A‘.?:0// • Keith S. Liden Associate Planner (KSL:bs/1340P) . 12755 S,W.ASH p» ,BOX 23397 `f(GAPb,OtIEGON OM PH:635.4171 ` f WA 1«•rv.,+µ'WYIn uyµ.,,i uM.urulNnNNWtut'+x.r..• ' ,...�^ ,. , ,..�.... �.-. i ,.., e Y • r n Pnmrryy k1,11 v , w .'-1vr. iII.N.'1An•4.«WA AUu+nrw.LxaW,Y+.•4.J4 •e.,s '0000 i Tigard-Tualatin-King City-Sherwood-Metzger-Washington Square / $40" i/, 198 TIRDAREPC: , R OF COMMERCE May 7 , 1985 Mayor John Cook City of Tigard R.O. Box 23367 Tigard, OR 97223 • Dear Mayor Cook: At the city council meeting Monday, April 29 the council voted unanimously to endorse the conceptual plan for the Main Street project presented by J.B. Bishop. The Chamber Board has expressed support of the concept both at the hearings level and in writing. The City Manager requested three weeks to permit staff to prepare findings of the council. It appears that the addi. tional time imposes a hardship on the developer and it is our hope that the council give the matter a timely heating. F t:d In reviewing the decision of the council April 29, it ap- pears that the council ' s requirement for a 50 ' setback at the southern boundry is not in compliance with. the Community Development Code. The developer has exceeded code by pro- • posing a 40 ' setback and 40 ' of landscaping while only 15 ' of landscaping is required. In the interest of quality development for southern Main Street. It is our hope that the Council will give the Main Street project a timely hearing. Sincerely, d4c4, 4 0 anne M. Caswell Manager . 0000 ,r 12995 .W. PACIFIC HWY., SUITE A El TIGARD0 OR 97223 0 639-1656 •' .0 o. 00 0 0 0000 00...0_,0 ...0...0 0 0 000 .. 00 0 0 00 000. . ... 00. -.00, 0 .•. ., . .. .a1 n h.J t,JMd. r @Y.'}+MYU W14n d.« 00.00 _ .. .r i . 0000, .. xi w• Ji4"c+ . , • rvi6 5/.2A5,6,0 tl Y 7 w BALL. JAN I K & NOV �� ' ATTORNEYS AT LAW mg ONE MAIN PLACE m { o 1985 101 S.W, MAIN STREET e (' ROBERT S. BALL PORTLAND,OREGON 97204 //I�/� STEPHEN T JANIK TELEPHONE(55Q,;'3)228-2525 / UI? ®� i ' '—" � KENNETH M.ORCHARD TELECOPY 91053080 5470 58 �`�•tt`` i�� ACOH TANZ R JACK L,O, PERKINS JOHN W. LILJEGREN SUSAN M,QUICK WILLIAM H, PERKI CHRISTOPHER W.ANGIUS VICKI G, BAYLESS DENISE FRANCIS May 2, 1925 BARBARA W. RADLER MICHAEL C,WALCH Honorable John Cook • Mayor, City of Tigard P. 0. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: MAIN STREET PROJECT/PD 1-85 and ZC5-85 Dear Mayor Cook: On behalf of Main Street Land Corporation, we would like to raise a few issues relating to the City Council' s tentative approval on April 29 of the Conceptual Development Plan for the Main street Project. 1. The City Manager asked that the staff be permitted three weeks (until May 21 ) to prepare appropriate findings and documents reflecting the Council' s approval. We do not think such a delay is warranted by the facts of this case and ask that the staff and City Attorney respond by the May 13 City Council meeting, giving the staff two weeks to prepare appropriate documents. One issue to be resolved by the staff relates to traffic to be generated by the project. At the April 29 hearing, Mr. Monahan already had in his possession a letter of April 25 from • the Oregon State Highway Division, describing the State' s review of traffic A copy of that letter is . _, f is issues. enclosed for your information. With the traffic analysis already submitted by Wayne Kittleson on behalf of the developer, we do not believe three weeks are necessary to review and resolve any outstanding traffic issues. Our purpose in asking for a more timely response by el: r approval process and maximize the prospect uff is to expedite the • the s of the property this summer.agreement with Costco and development of finalizing a p p y ' " . 2, We believe that the Cllineoor;tcthessouth.ern�b requiring City � , a 50 foot setback from the property boundary if,lthelproperty. adjacent e proposed Costco building is of the ad, acent to the o illegal. No legal justification e*fists for enlarging the setback • C". ♦ , .ruw.".v.,n.rww�wr. .rr..e...w,.r..�..r up« + '1*n...4 ' ♦ • ♦ I4 ALL, JAN K & NOVACk Honorable John Cook Mayor, City of Tigard May 2, 1985 Page Two requirement. As we pointed out during the hearing, the setback standards of the Community Development Code are objective, not subjective. The developer has already proposed a 40 foot setback although only a 30 foot building setback is required. In addition, the developer has proposed 40 feet of landscaping and berxning in the setback area, although only 15 feet of landscaping is required. . The developer' s concern about the setback is motivated by more than a concern that the City adhere to its own ordinances. After meetings with the project architects, it is apparent that an increased setback would seriously disrupt internal circulation .` in the site plan. Yet it seems clear that the additional 10 feet of setback would not be necessary to screen adjoining properties from the proposed Costco building, particularly in view of the fact that the developer has designed 40 feet of landscaping while only 15 feet are required by our ordinance. We therefore ' ask that the City Council reconsider this aspect of its tentative _ decision, and delete the increased setback requirement. 3. We would like to confirm that the City Council has approved the construction of a sidewalk and a bicycle path on the east side of the realigned Ash Avenue, without requiring the developer also to construct: a sidewalk on the west side of Ash Avenue. As reflected by the enclosed final order of the City in 1982, the Council 'then required a sidewalk only on one side of Ash Avenue. As indicated in the current site e side•� . plan, requ irement of a sidewalk on the west s of Ash Avenue would interfere with landscaping and screening that are proposed along the east side of the proposed Costco building. Our understanding is that the City would perfer to have the landscaping as proposed. • Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, R-bert S. Ball w RSB/ew cc: Bob Jean Bill Monahanr/ Timothy V. Ramis, Esq, JB Bishop 4 •1 A �I yr • N O T I C E O F P U B L I C HE A R I N G NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AT ITS MEETING ON MONDAY, '� April 29, 1985 AT 7:30 P.M. , IN THE LECTURE ROOM OF FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, 10865 SW WALNUT, TIGARD, OR. , WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: 4 1! !S 4 FILE NO. : PD 1-85 & ZC 5-85 APPLICANT: J B Bishop/Main Street Land Corp. OWNER: Same 10505 SW Barbur Blvd. S 303 Portland, Oregon 97219 REQUEST: Review Planning Commissions recommendation for conceptual plan approval of a 22 1,000 square foot retail, center on a 20.3 acre parcel; and for approval of a Zone Change from R--12 (PD) (Resident$.al., 12 units/ acre) to CBD (Central Business District) for a 3. 19 acre parcels LOCATION: Southeast side of Ash Street., (WCTM 2S1 2AC, lots 1200, • 1300, 1400, 1500 1600, 2200, 2300, 2301, and 201, WCTM 2S1 2DB lot 300) . (See map on reverse side) THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF PROCEDURES OF THE CITY COUNCIL. TESTIMONY MAY J3E SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO BE ENTERED INTO THE RECORD: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT Tilt CITY RECORDER OR PLANNING DIRECTOR AT 639-=4171 CITY OF TIGARD ya 12755 S.W. ASh Ave. Tigard, Oregon 07223 (corner of ASh & Burnham) (0272P) 3. I• . TIGARD CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES - APRIL 29, 1985 - 7:30 P.M. I, ROLL CALL; Present: Mayor John Cook; Councilors: Tom Brian, Phil Edin, Jerry Edwards, and Ima Scott; City Staff: Bob Jean, City Administrator; Bill Monahan, Community Development Director; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; and Loren Wilson, Deputy City Recorder, 2. CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS u4 a, No one appeared to speak, 3, RESOLUTION NO. 85-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON, ESTABLISHING A NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH ADVISORY ') COMMITTEE. a, Captain Jennings synopsized purpose of committee, introduced John Sedey who has been working with the Polite Department on this project, and recommended adoption, b, Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to approve ResolUtion No 85-27 and acceptance of the procedures manual for the committee. Approved by Unanimous vote of Council present, 4, ORDINANCE NO. 85-17_ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE 7,32,120 DISCHARGE OF WEAPONS BY PROVIDING FOR THE TESTING OF WEAPONS BY GUNSMITHS IN APPROVED SHOOTING BOOTHS AND BULLET TRAPS, Required Second Reading, a. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by councilor Brian to adopt, Approved by Majority vote of CoUhcil preseht, CoUhcilor Scott voting nay, 5, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT Pb 1-85 ZONE CHANGE ZC 5-85 MAIN PAREET LAND CORP, NPO ill Review Planning Commission recommendation for conceptu al plan approval of a 221,000 square foot retail center on a 20,3 acre parcel; and for approval of a Zone Change from R-1200) (Residential, 12 units/acre) to COD-PO (Central Business District) for a 3,i9 aCre parcel on the • southeast side of Ash Street, (WCTM 291 2AC 1200, 1800, 1400, 1500, . 1600, 2200, 2.8m, not, and 201; WCTM 2$1 na no), This Was an "argument—type" hearing only, 144 A i i ‘ i 41 . a. Mayor Cook oUtLined the typo of nearing alio proCtsS Which WoULa toe used in the public hearing, Legal Counsel stated a petition was circulated in the neighborhood • e ' •• and if Council had v.eceived copies bhey should disregard, as this • WAS new evidence and not AdmiSsible, Page - COMO. MINUTES Anti_ 29, 1905 -•-ter•..,.:. M /, n: . (' Councilor Edin stated he lived 25O' away from the subject site and has been a neighborhood advocate on transportation and neighborhood issues for many years, However, he does not feel a conflict of interest exists. He has had contact with the applicant regarding a transportation matter but did not discuss the merits of this plan at that time: Councilor Edin further stated that he will hear this matter with an open mi.n6 and make a finding that will uphold the Comp Plan. Councilor Brian also noted several contacts with residents from the area and stated he has had previous contacts with the applicant's attorney Mr, Ball: He stated these contacts would , have no effect on his decision. 1 • b. Public Hearing Opened • C. Director of Community Development synopsized the history of the issues, noting that there were two separate requests. Consideration of the conceptual plan for the development and a zone change request. He noted Planning Staff had recommended approval of the original conceptual plan and denial of the zone change request, and that Planning Commission recommended approval of both, with the zone change requiring a covenant to be recorded • which would not allow any construction on that particular lot: Director of Community Development stated Council then called this t matter up for review, d, Public Testimony: • • Proponentst 1- C ,. 0 Mr: Robert 'ball, applicant's attorney, 101 SW Main, Portland, . spoke to their desire for Council approval on the conceptual plan, He stated the Planning Commission record shows no conflict With TMC Section 18,8O:120 which sets the only approval criterion /AL for planned developments, Attorney Ball continued to outline the / history of the site, phasing plans; buffering concerns, and noted ` , the development meets economic development requirements. He also stated the requested zone change was consistent with the Comp Plan map which was the underlying; zone requirement, He noted that a sensitive lands permit is ntiided from the Heraings Officer. The project must be completed in less than sever years, consistent ■ with the Code A street vacation is needed. The applicant will dedicate the street created on the new alignment of Ash Avenue upon completion, , i ' o Mr, Dennis Brun, applicant's architect, stated that the Original s i.te an has been mod if i,ed to add p ress some of the concerns heard g � . limit' at the Plannin Comriiiss�.on hearing, Ne no;iced the modified plan • would include more landscaping, design to limit noise, and street • alignment modification, He discussed the phasing of the project , A, and explained the elements of each phase, o Mr, Wayne Kittleson, applicant's traffic engineer, distributed a letter from Kittleson and Associates which addressed tri nor day and other traffic ` • , r i 1, �.`rnpact issues He noted that the an. �r :irking. has been modified in the new plan to be over 200 feet i+,side the ' page 2 _ COUNCIL MUMS S — AORIL 29, 1985 .r • development and would allow for 9-11 vehicles to stack before interrupting the traffic flow on Main Street. o Attorney Ball synopsized the presentations and drew attention to the sidewalks and bi (' . Gary Ott mentioned no legal opinion has been received on those cc issues questioning compliance with the Code. 0. Public Hearing Closed f. Council Consideration ; . Lengthy discussion followed. Councilors discussed their concerns regarding traffic impact, zone change inappropriateness, Ash Avenue/Johnson Street connection, Ash Avenue alignment, landscaping and berms, and homeowner involvement in placement of landscaping on south side, g, Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edin to make a tentative finding of denial for the zone change request with the exception of that parcel of land west of the proposed Ash Avenue right—of—way realignment as depicted on the modified plan and direct staff to prepare necessary papers for final action. Approved by majority Vote of Council present. Councilors Edin and Scott voting nay', h. Motion by Councilor Edin, seconded by Councilor Brian to tentatively place a PO designation on that portion of tax lot 300 of the modified site that is currently zoned CBI) and rezone that portion of the modified site on the west side of SW Ash Avenue proposed right—of.-way to CBR—PD and direct staff to prepare necessary documents for final action, Approved by Unanimous vote of Council present, Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Coo.rdlor Scott to tentatively find the conceptual plan as modified, be approved with the following conditions and modifications and request staff prepare the necessary documents for final action including appropriate findings set forth in the staff report. hopping area shall not allow traffic to access Ash Avenue, ci There will be ho public streets within the parking lot, o No parking lot shall be constructed for employees east of SW Ash Avenue realignment, ci Phase I construction shall includet o the retail building: o all parking lot and parking landscaping shown on modified plan, phase t o all ingress—egress to Main Street and 09W; o all improvemenb bordering the greenway, bikepaths, or 7 pedestrial walks realignment of Ash AvenUel grading of phases II and III areas ci finalized landscape plan shall guarantee proper installation and perpetual maintenance ci retail building in Phase t shall be set back 50 feet from south property line of development as it adjoins the existing residential neighewl./od, Page 4 - CoUNCII MINUTa' Mtn 20, 1006 lommirmarrommorimmommisminima ,'1 f, ` F o Dedication of necessary right—of—way which is required so the r` applicant can building Ash Avenue, 0 Conceptual plan approval subject to staff review of traffic study information. o The park land shown on the plan, including groenway/floodway areas, shall be dedicated to the City. a A thirty Foot setback along the south property line as it adjoins the R-12 zone will be maintained, o All subsidiary applications, documents, and fees shall be filed with the City, o Staff conditions from the April 2, 1985 staff report, items 1-4, must be complied with, as follows: a Sensitive Lands approval will be required for all grading and improvements within the 100 year flood plain, A Sensitive Lands approval shall be obtained before the Detailed Plan is submitted for review, o A detailed Plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval that is in conformance with the requirements in 18,50 of the Coder In addition, said plan shall include the following information or modifications: a, Buffering and screening consistent with Section • 18,80,120 (a) 08) (B) and Chapter 18,100 of the Code, ;< b, Identification and location of noise sources within the western portion of the project and a method for shielding adjoining residences from excessive noise impacts; c, The landscaping plan for the development shall preserve as many trees over six inch caliper on the site nis practical., o Specific conditions relating to public improvements shall be applied upon Detailed Plan approval. o This approval is valid if exercised within ohe year of the filial; decision date, Approved by unanimous vote of Council present, j , City Administrator stated that appropriate documents would be back to council at least by the 20th of May, for review the site design trevYew of the intent Of CoUhcil to call• k, Councilor E�r�.ah stated that Up 4`, P y this project. REC88S: 10t,20 P.M. RCONV5,IVEt 10r85 P.M. page 5 — COMM MXtUTt3 — APRIL 20, 1905 , 7C *'1(" ITTELSON ASSOCIATLS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 512 S,W,BROADWAY • PORTLAND,OREGON 97205 • (503)228-5230 • April 29, 1985 6.00 Mr. J. B. Bishop Main Street Land Corporation 10505 S.W. Barbur Blvd. , Suite 303 Portland, Oregon 97219 Dear Mr. Bishop: In accordance with your request, I have reviewed the current proposal for the Main Street Development in Tigard in relation ". to an analysis conducted by CH2M HILL for this same site in March 1982. Based upon this review, it is my conclusion that the CH2M HILL report is still applicable, and that there will be no significant differences, in terms of traffic volumes and traffic-related impacts, between the current site plan and the plan that was under consideration in March 1982. The basis for this conclusion is provided in the following paragraphs. The primary factors affecting the traffic impacts likely to be associated with a particular development are the total amount of traffic volume that will be generated, and the location of the development's access pnints in relation to the surrounding ' , . 1' street system. Neither of these factors has changed . substantially from the conditions that existed at the time that CH2M HILL's March 1982 report was prepared. 4 With respect to traffic volume, CH2M HILL estimated that the site would generate approximately 11 ,900 one-way vehicle trip ends on a daily basis, representing 5,950 entering vehicles and 5,950 exiting vehicles. It was also estimated that the site would generate 1,000 P p .m. pealk hour vehicle trip ends, with 470 entering and 530 exiting. Based upon the current site plan, which contains 221100 gross s q ua re feet o f retail and commercial floor area, it is estlmated that upon full buildOttvthecdevelopment will gene's p iJUatel 200 . generate a pro�e$� � 'Y" 11; ends on a daily basis, and 1,060 p.m. • p eak hour Vehicle trip ends. This projection is not significantly different from the projection that was prepared by CH2M HIDL in Match 1982. The proposed location of site access drives has also not changed sub atantially since March 1992. In fact, the only • change is the relocation of the access drive onto Ash street a ` • .f. .M f 1 • I{r • , Mr. J.B. Bishop April 29, 1985 • Page Two j from the north end of the property to a point farther south. This relocation will not affect the ability of vehicles using Ash Street to get into and out of the proposed development, but will tend to discourage vehicles from using the site's internal circulation system as a way of traveling betweeen Pacific Highway/Main Street and the Ash neighborhood. Furthermore, it is proposed that at the time that Ash Street is connected to Burnham, this sole access drive onto Ash Streeet Will be closed to all •but emergency vehicles. The iy effect of this closure will be to reduce the number of vehicle trips using the site's access onto Main Street by about 140 vehicles during the evening peak hour, since this is the number of vehicle trips that Would otherwise use the site's • internal circulation system as a short cut between the Ash neighborhood and Pacific Highway/Main Street. • You have also asked that we consider the currently proposed angle parking along the access drive leading to Main Street, and evaluate the likely effect that it will have on the operation of the Main Street/Access Drive intersection. Generally, angle parking can canoe significant disruption to normal traffic flow during typical parking and unparking manuevers. However, three factors associated with your site • • design effectively neutralize any potential ;Adverse effects on � . the operation of the intersection. First, a 30-feet wide roadway is provided for tiro-way traffic flout in the vicinity of the proposed angle parking (By cotparisom, a typical roadway width Would be 24 feet) . Second, angle parking is allowed on only one side of the roadway (ih the inbound e direction) . Finally, the angle parking is Jocated lipproialyVeoifeet away from the Main Street/Access Drive i ehicles without affectin thhe�o eratioa� of the intersect g_�( . ntersection, this distance Will allov� for t g . . �' g p tion. Taking all these factors into account, it is very unlikely . . that the proposed angle parking Will haves a significant efferct Oh the safety or Operating characteriotics of the proposed • Mein Street/Access D]lve intersection. • Tn summary, the traffic impacts associated With the proposed development will not be substantially different from those i , p y that �rere described in CH2M =Lib March �.9i32 re ort. $ o h pent na ai report, t bite can bedevcloF des p lannedw With minimal impacts onthe surrounding street system. • • 1' O •• Mr. J.B. Bishop April 29, 1985 Page Three " I hope that this information is sufficient for your needs. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any additional comments or questions related to this matter that I may be able to answer. Sincerely, • • 0,0", K. Kitte son, P:B. l�ri•* ' ipal • • • • • • • • • f•. r , 1 . • ' 4 n` ..i r w M,.t....1�,•"L•a• A 1 '.uti:i ZtVe °«, 1 Wi'�t��• «y F 3tti M t *4:". .y. F 1 MU* t 1111, .0\ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ? 19$5 ORDINANCE NO. 82-20 (, VkGi r AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY AND GENERAL PLAN AND GRANTING A SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT TO MAIN STREET LANG) CORPORATION/J. B. BISHOP (CPR 8-8 1 , CPR 9-81 AND M2-81) AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, on June 22, 1981 , the Tigard City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan Revision to the C-3 MPD (Main Street Commercial Planned Development) designa- Lion for a 16.6-acre site located at 12660 S.W. Main in the City of Tigard and further described as: Washington County Tax Map 2S1 2AC, Tax Lots 201 , 1200, 1300, 1400, 1500 1600,2200 and 2301 ; and WHEREAS, on December 8, 1981 , the Tigard Planning Commission granted prelimi.n- ary approval of the applicant 's site access proposal; and WHEREAS, on March 2, 1982, the applicant filed its application for Preliminary and General Plan Review for a commercial development on the above-described site and an application for a Sensitive Lands Permit to fill within the 100 -year food-- plain; and WHEREAS, the Tigard Planning Commission considered testimony of interested persons concerning the applications at a public hearing, during its regularly scheduled meeting on April 6, 1982, following public notice in accordance with city ordinance; and s , `g Planning Commission vote unanimously to approve the applica- tions the Tigard ' tions with conditions recommended by the Planning staff and to forward the matter, in accordance with 08.56.043 of the Tigard Municipal Code to the City Council for final review; • NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OE TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Preliminary and General Plan for the sub3ect property be and hereby .e p oved and a Sensitive ve Lan t be and hereby g , sub- , are ap "r ensiti Lands Perini is ranted s ct to the following conditions, as recommended by Planning staff and endorsed by the Planning Commission: i t e ' Y + a. The applicant shall apply for Site Design Review addressing the items Set forth in 6 18.59.060 of the Tigard Municipal Code; b. The applicant shall address the availability of . public 8ervx ces to his ,rte, specificall y s ewer, water and storm drainage: A Public Facilities Plan ahAll be submitted to the City of Tigard 8ngineer'ing Division and be approved prior to issuance of any building permits, Ash Avenue shall be improved to full strort improvements fr'otn end of current improvements from Hill Street to 'anno Creek Lo 4 a . ...r..._ . . • ..m .'IFaie. . ., i' Vl,..S5.1 F .li. u r,.ialWt,W • • A R 4 1. approved city standards to a width of 32' except no sidewalks shall be required 1, on the S.E. side of S.W. Ash Avenue( c. The street connecting Pacific Highway and Ash Avenue shall be a public street from and including curb to curb designed to accommodate collector street loads, and at a depth not less than the City of Tigard's collector street standards 1 � for cross section. Said street shall contain all public utilities or approved easements. The applicant shall agree to donate to the City of Tigard for public use the two streets which cross the site; d. The applicant shall submit detailed" engineering plans for fill and excava- tion work to be done on the site and in the park. The Army Corps of Engineers shall review the detailed plans for effect of the proposal on water velocities and direction of floodwater flow; e. No more than one structure is allowed on any tax lot. The tax lots involved in this project should be consolidated into one tax lot, or lot line adjustments shall • he filed with Washington County so that each structure occupies one tax lot; f. Specific plans for rough grading in thevici,nity of the lake proposed in the 1) town-Fanno Creek Park shall be reviewed by the Park Board. Detailed engineering plans for rough grading in the park area and excavation of the lake shall be sub- , mitted to and be approved by the City of Tigard's Engineering Division, Said rough grading shall be accomplished by the applicant in accordance with the approved • rough grading plans on the'Design Review approval Under Tigard Municipal Code, Chapter 18.59. g. The applicant shall receive approval from the Building Department and • Public Works Department confirming that soils conditions are appropriate for on struction prior to issuance of building permits; • h. The applicant shall obtain a permit in accordance with ORS Chapter 541 or demonstrate that the statute is not applicable to applicant's construction of its commercial developments on the site. Section 2: The,following additional coneitions be and hereby are imposed on the su e ject application. • a. Notice of site plan approval by the Director under Tigard Municipal Code sections 18.59:010 to 18. 15.100 and section 18.84.050 (A2) shalt be given immedi. ion and the Council subject ea ately to the Commission cx,1 and shall be sub ect to appeal 1 and review by t1•� bodies under Tigard Municipal Code section 18.84.25O(b)(2) and related sections. `�� Tray peace, ,and Safety of the P p y for the, - health Section 3. Inasmuch as it i•> nec.- rd that the s e • eo le of the city of ,� subject application be approved .- ef'fective�upon itsgpas " is hereby declared to ex' t, and this ordinance shall. be f�►rt �wxth an emergency y i�s sae b .. the Council and approval by the Mayor. PAS8E0: By n read two times b number Vote of all Council members present after be-� e day of April. g y and title this 26th 1982. ' Recorder - City of Tigard .� . .•�' APPROVED: By the Mayor this, 28th day of Aped , 1982. M: o - City of Tigard Alr40 APPROVED END A8 TO FOAM 41* rfr. All ors-ri•i • 1 - {„ .R ... +.4.LW....1.':41f F.ta:y 4nyyi,, w,...J,L-aAy`f.,, • }j_-: a c r ,. ,a_A2.....c t•• IB } Tigard-Tualatin-King City-Sherwood-Metzger-Washington Square TI6ARDARBCHAMBER COMMERCE April 26, 1985 � M Mayor John Cook Tigard City Council City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 , Dear Mayor Cook: • The Chamber of Commerce is on record supporting the deve- lopment presented by JB Bishop. At a Board of Directors meeting Tuesday, April 23, the Board authorized the issuance of this letter to reiterate our support for the concept presented by JB Bishop. It is felt that the development will greatly enhance the downtown area and will ensure the positive growth of the south end of downtown. It is our concern that downtown be a positive area in which to conduct business and we believe the project presented you by JB Bishop can accom- plish this goal . It is our understanding that some concern over the sensitive land issue remains in question. It is our hope that staff p y city's can work with Mr. Bishop to satisfy the � ' concerns p of the property get underway and that the development o as soon as the issues are resolved. • sincerely, Dennycliurkey � ,d President • 12995 S1W1 PACIFIC HWY, SUITE A 0 11(ARID, OFD 97223 Q 639-16J6 . v r • • MEMORANDUM /iiyuralliygi�pipQp' CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON � • aryOF W" ': •, WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON • TO: Members of the City Council April 26, 1985 • FROM: Patrick Kennedy, Vice Chairman Tigard Economic Development Committee SUBJECT: Main Street Project, PD 1-85, ZC 5- 85 The Tigard Economic Development Committee has had an opportunity to review the • project of Main Street Land Corporation. The Committee members have been • polled and it has been established that the Economic Development Committee can support in concept the development project. In, addition, the Committee encourages the City to do all that is within its power when applying the City Comprehensive Plaa and Community Development Code to the project to help to make the project a reality. ,;/1A/e/44/ CI) 1282P dmj •• • • • • • • 12755 5,1111 ASH pA bOX 28807 TIQApb, OlgEOON O2g3. PH:589-4i 71 • [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] R x;171.,ii•Z N: Oregon State Highway Division DISTRICT 2A MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR VICTOR nrivEH P.O. BOX 565, BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075-0565 PHONE 229-5002 GOVERNOR April 25 , 1985 In Reply(Refer to File No,; Bill Monahan Director of Planning/Community Development City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: J.B. Bishop t Main Street Development 99W Dear Mr. Monahan: Access to the subject property was constructed under permit to the City of Tigard L.S.D. #37 , in the fall of 1982 . As a condition of the pe,.mit , the access is required to be signalized prior to the issuance of a occupancy permit. Traffic signal financing and in- stallation was to be covered by a two-party agreement between the state and the city, Miscellaneous Contract and Agreement #7749, it was never executed by the state • or the city. To fulfill the condit ions of the access permit, a three-party agreement between the state, the city and the developer will be prepared by ODOT. A traffic impact study prepared by the L.I.D. proposal in 1982 and reviewed by our Traffic Engineering staff prior to the issuance of the access permit indicated: 1) The subject access would require signalizaiton. This is still a requirement and will be covered in the forthcoming agreement . 2 ) Our review indicated a conflict with the drive- way access to the school located on the north s.1de of 99W, across from the subject access. It is my understanding that this driveway has been removed. A copy of the authority by which this work was done will satisfy our concerns. 8 ) Maintaining a three-lane approach in the P. subject access with sufficient storage. This has been addressed to our satisfaction in the current plan. • 4 ) Our review of the current plan and projected volumes on 99W indicate that a re-striping of the median area between Johnson and the subject access shoUld be done to provide a two-way left turn in this section. Parts 7 4189 • . _ • i { Page Two City of Tigard This striping revision will be included in the traffic signal installation covered by the forthcoming agreement. :f This agreement requires the developer to deposit with ;:he state an amount equal to 100% of the estimated total cost of the signal installation. . Sincerely, ' y Leonal H. Gunderson Asst. District Maintenance Supervisor L,HG:j s cc: Ed Hardt Ron Failmez ger • , • 1 1115 1 ' YYY 4 • . 4 A ,M1. ,., ,.,.o,.,� urrwrwrY+wea•�'1++r' „wM1Y.. 4W.• ..,au.•. - • _., .. ♦ . r; ' ry H -. • Tigard, Oregon April 19, 1985 Mayor r John Cook ?Ogg MID ; . Tigard City Council Members Tigard, Oregon, 97223. APR 25 1985 .. Dear Mr. Mayor and Council, Members CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT. This letter is in reference to-he Main Street Land Corport.tion request for conceptual and detailed planned development approval for a 228,000 square foot retail center ` and related facilities on a 21. 8 acre property zoned CBD (PD) and for } ,;• approval of a Zone Change from R-12 (PD) Residential, ! ,. 12 units per acre to CBD (Central Business District) for a 3.19 acre parcel. The above is on your April 29, 1985, Agenda. File No. PD 1-85 and ZC 5 .85. After my Wife and I went to City Hall to look at these plans , there are some things about the 'plans that we are very concerned about. No. 1: The Comprehensive Plan of the City of Tigard says that established single family residential areas should be protected. There is about three acres of land next to the Philadelphia Square Apartments that they want to make into a large parking lot for 60 cars or more to accommodate the 150 I .. employees of the large building on the Plan. These employees work on two shifts. So several cars Would be parking about 7 AM and the second shift leaving about 1.0 PM. We feel that this parking lot is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and would create excessive noise and air pollution. We want the zoning : to stay R-12 (PD) residential. We strongly appose a zone change to CBD (Central Business District) as this land is design- aced Greenway and Flood Plain which acconing to an earlier NPa#1 Book was to remain a Greenway and Flood Plain area and be a buffer between the residential areas and the Central Business District. j pheasants There is wild life in the area such as ducks, a nd other rare birds. A few years ago this area was like a large lake after several days of heavy rains with water up to the Philadelphia Square Apartments. This 3. 19 acre of land was not included in Mr. Bishops plans of two years ago. No. 2: The plan Mr. Bidip had about two years ago was more ;;� compatible with the large surrounding residential neighborhood. The plan did not have a sweeping road from Pacific Highway going into the low density single family residential areas or avlarge parking lot across Ash Avenue to the East into the Flood Plain, Creehwayand Park area which is a buffer for these residential - areas, Ccntinued: k A y ywin........-.,... ,. a..:x_.a . _y----- ---- Page 2 of 2: The present proposed plan has two streets coming into the residential area from Pacific Highway and Main Street. Later when Ash Avenue is extended across Fanno Creek to Burnham Street that would make three streets disrupting a residential area with a heavy traffic volume which will far exceed the allowed traffic volume limit on residential streets . Also, there would be excessive noise and air pollution. Hill Street which is now a dead-end street will be opened next year to Omara Street with 67 additional homes being built bw;:Century 21 Properties on the Omara Site. The Omara Site was rezoned for a higher density than was first accounted for in the original traffic ' studies made by Mr. Butke, this making the traffic volume on Ash Avenue and Hill Street far exceeding the allowed limit. These residential streets were not made to take the volume of traffic 7 , teat will be generated by the propsed shopping center if all these streets are allowed to come into these neighborhoods. We feel that the traffic volume of over 11,000 cars per day projected by the present plan is too much for this residential area to • accept. We are requesting that the proposed shopping center not be allowed to back door any streets into these residential areas so as to protect the character and livability of our neighborhoods . When we purchased our land and built our home ten years ago, we were assured by the City of Tigard that the only streets to be extended through our area would be Ash Avenue and Hill Street. No streets were on the map to connect Ash Avenue with Pacific Highway. Also, that the Greenway was to remain o1.r buffer from the Central Business District. Since then a steady eros. on of the livability in this n L eighborhood has occurred. We wish to retain What character is left of this unique area. So whatever decisions are will livability and character of this made will affect the permanent y established low deneity residential area of several hundred homes. . Thank you very much for your time and consideration. 1 Sincerely,. /7 1 1 {/ YID y 'V�Y % 4 ' jar G.. Paul and Gloria Johnson 9300 S. W. Hill Street Tigard, Oregon, 91223 : 1 • • 1u 1 (.1 11 a , AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. . City of Tigard ) ' I, Ark ? o C Y , being first duly sworn, on oath depose , , . and say : (Please Print 1 • y ( I.: ... That I am a /e s./ t for The City of Ti a d, ms Oregon. That I served notice of a public hearing for City Council. r' P,. 1z 1 of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each of the following named persons on the / 7 day of ,4p /.4,_ 198 .S" , by mailing to 0 ., each of them at the address shown on the attached list (Marked Exhibit B), said notice as hereto attached, deposited in the United States Mail, on the day of rt'• y,__, 198 ,,, postage prepaid. :: ' ,....,I 6 690 Ade? 47e#4"'"'"aWall'a ' Signature \ �. \ raz Person who delivelF'd to POST OFFICE Y ' Subscribed and sworn to before me on the ,/p ((( day of (,�: , 1.986--. ) p y'F „k , " NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON w N M a., *?00[7009,. , wk "" " ," My ddhuniss ion Expired: , 9t 8-2 7., '` (U257p) . . REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS TO: DATE . FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: i Jr " dOc_reelyvi-A44,:t . . .7,0 _ . 4 Ai 1 LALL____.L,gre6 4 ---21p711 If n Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by 19 . You may use the spaced, provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. Iyou are unable spon to red by the above date; please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O. Box 23397, Burnham and Ash Ave. , Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. # l,' Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments: �W ,C O� �� ` ��A� / C;• ---Xit„ .ie.- A , 'i//5 f Lae, i( r(hoa/ A ' ' f Ails f / / .0 0 JY 0 ,, f z A of . . 1 ..' . ' ... 4 p / ,71-3 .—{d , 7 lid„0"- k114._.', O J°i1t iii ii i,,, . a fit. , ti 3 aan C,___a,y, ' t 4 I , t.7- 17 i , 6,1/1 1 :72,1„›. . it Name of Person Commenting:,,` - r /'„ , 'f r 1f`' � Phone No ea + - tk.(r0t,-, e:trzt.i. (eAtlihr ''' Clt:pm/t)356P) t ti / 5 'Op ,rie, I lit-&, 1 e .. lox . „e..,..i.. „ 4,4e-Avetir, ~41: 4... thifr&, /9'4-'71 • 1 = 1 6. OTHER BUSINESS 6.1 o Associate Planner Liden stated that he had received a request for a • time extension for Park Place Phase I, (5 8--83PD). Discussion • followed. Commission Butler moved and Commission Owens seconded to approve a six month time extension for Park Place Phase I, file number S 8-83 PD. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioner present. • 6.2 o JB Bishop requested that changes be made to his final order. Staff explained that this was, not the appropriate time or place to correct a final order. Amendments could be made to the final order at the City Council hearing on May 29, 1985. 7'. Meeting Adjourned 10:45 P.M. Diane M. Jelderks, Secretary • ATTEST: Bonnie Owens, Vice President {1 .• • 1269P r' • • F i 4 PLAN INC COMMISSION M1NUTg8 April 16, 1985 Page 6 • • CITY OF TIGARD FINAL ORDER NO. 85- 477 PC . A FINAL ORDER INCLUDING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS, WHICH APPROVES APPLICATIONS • FOR CONCEPTUAL PLAN APPROVAL (PD 1-85) AND A ZONE CHANGE (ZC 5-85) REQUESTED BY MAIN STREET LAND CORP. The Tigard Planning Commission received the above application at a public hearing On April 2, 1985. The Commission based its decision on the facts, findings, and conclusions noted below: • ' A. FACTS , 1. General Information CASE: Planned Development PD 1-85 and. Zone Change ZC 5-85 REQUEST: For Conceptual Plan approval for a 221,000 square foot retail center on a 20.3 acre property and for a Zone Change from R-12 (PD) Residential, 12 units/acre) to CBD (Central • Business District) for a 3.19 acre parcel on the southeast side of Ash Street. .Q• • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Central Business District ZONING DESIGNATION: CBD (Central Business District) and R--12(PD) ° (Residential, 12 units/acre, planned development) 1 APPLICANT: Main Street Land Corp. OWNER: Same Suite 303, 10505. SW Barbur Blvd. ' Portland, Oregon 97219 LOCATION: Southwest corner of Nain Street and Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tarr Map 2S1 2CC, Tax Lot 1200, 1300, 1400, 1500, 1600, 2200, 2300, 2301, 201 and 2S1 2DB, 300). 2. Background On April 26, 1982, the City Council granted Preliminary and General Plan approval as well as a Sensitive Landa Permit for the Main Street project (CPR 8--81, CPR 9-81, and M 2-81). The proposal included approximately 16 acres of land ane, 174,000 gross square feet of building area. The Planning Commission granted an extension for this approval on May 3, 1983. This extension has expired. .? 3. Vicinity r information t ° to t The prope r°• y the east is designated as greenway in the Comprehensive Plan and is the Bite of the Downtown F anno Creek Park. The properties to the Southwest and south are zoned CBD, R-'4:5, and -12(PD) and are • Mein 5treet� and �Paci�'in dHi shwa-�near the in rth send The properties along P single Y Highway of the project are toned CHO or C-O and are devoted to commercial uses. PINAL ORDER NOS 85- 41/_ Pc - PO 1-85 & 2C 5-85 - PACE 1 i J 4. Site Information and Proposal Description This site is vacant except for two buildings which will be removed prior to development. Fauna Creek runs through the eastern section of the t property and approximately five acres of the site lie Within the 100 • year flood plain. �! • The 1982 plan concept hms been revised to include a parcel on the southeast side of Ash Street and one other small parcel for a total of 20.3 acres. The total gross floor space of this commercial project will be approximately 221,000 square feet. The project is to be completed in three phases with a large retail store { • • (113,000 square feet) and the public improvements, including an extension of Ash St'reet through the project to Pacific Highway representing the first phase. A second access to Main Street is also proposed. The parcel on the opposite side of Ash Street is intended to be rezoned from R-12 (PD) to CBD and developed as a parking lot. Since the project will involve some filling and excavation, a Sensitive Lands approval will be necessary. This aspect of the development will be reviewed at a public hearing with the Hearings Officer. 5. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division has the following comments: a. The proposed access is in general conformance with the previously approved plan. b. The detailed plan should discourage or eliminate parking on the , , .M0 Ash Street extension and the Street leading to Main Street. c. The Ash Street extension should be designed to discourage through traffic into the neighborhood. ' d. A 90° intersection should be provided for the dead end street that will eventually cross Fanno Creek and join Ash Street on the other side. . (7 e., ,The revised plan will require the approval of a Sensitive Lands permit from the Hearings Officer. f. A landscaped buffer should be provided along the street connecting Ash street and Pacific Highway to screen the shopping center from • Fanno Creek Park. ' g P' objection p� The Building Ins ectioti Office has no obection to the roposal. . g`� way Division appeoved the proposed access on Pacific Tt�re State Di h Highway. Additional comments by the Division shall be available at the hearing. 9 PAGE«.. Y.1 - f 1 1v e PINAL ORDER NO, 55- PC _� Pb l�s5 & ;�C S��t�5 �AC��l, � (4_. . 7 ■ The Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District has the following comments: a. The barrier at Ash Street should be breakable to allow for emergency access. b. The driveway on Main Street should allow for inbound traffic. The Park Board has no objection to the proposal. ,' Comments have not been received from NPO # 1. R. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria for granting conceptual plan approval in this case are Statewide Planning 'Goals 1, 2, 5, 7, 8, and 9; Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.4.2, 3.5.3, 5.1.1, 5.1.3, . 6.3.3,, 6.6.1, 7.2.1, 8.1.3, 11.2.1, 11.2.2 and 11.2.3; and Community :a . Development Code chapters 18.66, 18.80, 18.84, and 18.100. The Planning Commission concludes that the proposal is consistent with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines based upon the H. •• following findings: { 1. Goal # 1 is met because the City has adopted a Citizens Involvement program including review of all development ' applications by the Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO). In • addition, all public notice req uirements were met. , • 2. Goal # 2 is met because the City applied all applicable Statewide Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan Policies and Development code requirements to the application. , 3. Goals # 5 and # 7 will be addressed during the Sensitive Lands review of the project. 4. Goal # 8 is satisfied because the site plan is compatible with the Fanno Creek Park Plan. The Park Board has reviewed the proposal and no objections Were raised. • 5. Goal # 4 i satisfied because the development will have a positive economic impact upon the.downtown area. • The Planning Commission has determined that the proposal, with several modifications, is consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted below: i 1. Plan Policy 2.1,1 is satisfied because the Nei ghborhood Planning . Organization and surrounding property owners Were given notice of the hearing and opportunity to comment on the applicant's proposal, Y 2 1,.. •.3 . 2, 342,30 ,5 3 0 . .. 2. Plan Policit�s 3: .2. 3.4.2 y 3. .� , and 7.2.1 shall be reviewed ,as part of the Sensitive Lands permit, process: ` r A ,d FINAL CIOUR NO, 85-:,,O/ PC - Pb 1-85 4 fC 5-85 °� PACE 3 , • 4: I": « Y U 111/ w_, y is y 3. Plan Policies 5.1.1. and 5.1.3 are satisfied because this ,. . ' commercial center will have a positive affect upon the local job market and it will contribute towards establishing the downtown as the viable core area for the community. 4. Plan Policy 6.3.3 is not completely satisfied because the downtown is considered to be an "Established Area" and development occuring within the area is intended to preserve and enhance the character • of these areas. The proposed site plan does not provide sufficient setbacks and/or buffering adjacent to some of the existing residential uses and therefore the project would have a , n •' detrimental impact upon these properties. , . 5. Plan Policy 6.6.1 is not satisfied because no buffering is shown on the site plan between some of the commercial structures and . adjacent residential buildings. Modifications to correct this . deficiency are noted below. 6. Plan Policy 8.1.3 will be satisfied during the detailed plan and constructed phases of the development. The public streets within r, the project will require a 50 foot wide right-of-way and a 32 root wide roadway. .. . 7. Plan Policies 11.2.1, 11.2.2 and 11.2.3 are satisfied because the ; site plan includes the extension of Ash Street to the eastern boundary of the project and a temporary barricade will be • installed near Hill Street. This obstruction will be removed in @, accordance with Policy 11.2.3. . . The Planning Commission concludes that with the modifications noted, the . proposal satisfies the relevant portions of the Community Development 1• . Code based upon the findings listed below; . . .` 1. Chapter 18.66 (CBD Zone) of the Code is satisfied because the proposal meets the. minimum standards relating to setbacks, lot coverage, and building height. 2. Chapter 18.80 (Planned Development of the Code is satisfied except for Section 18.80.110 (c)(3) and 18.80.120 (a)(3): The ' • staff understands that extensive grading dl1 be necessary on the site, but a generalized grading concept has not been submitted. The grading proposed in the flood plain may be reviewed during the Sensitive Lands review. The land form alteration to be done On- i the remainder Of the site is critical for conceptual review in i order to determine the relationship between the neW coimmercial buildings and the residences to the south and West. Section 18.80 ' no landsca 18.80.120 or vl.sual� hot is a shown in saes, ( ) ( 1 c p $ , g the commercial buildings and nearby residential uses. Of particular concern are Visual impact and the noise from loading areas and ft ` . a PINAL O tht k NO, 85- e?'7.,� PC - Pb 145 4 2C 5485 - PACE 4 ' (: ) building ventilation systems. Additional information must be submitted to illustrate how these negative impacts will be mitigated. The site contains several large fir trees and one significant cluster of trees on the western boundary of the project near Pacific Village Apartments. Section 18.80.120 (a) (3) of the Code . • • requires that trees with a six inch caliper or greater be saved whenever possible. The proposed site plan indicates that all existing trees will be removed. The plan should be revised to save as many of these larger trees as possible. This is particularly true of the trees along the western boundary of the project because of their usefulness as a landscaped buffer. Finally, the requirements for landscaping and screening will vary • depending upon the decision that is made regarding CPA 1-85/ZC • 1-85 for Pacific Village Apartments. 3. Chapter 18.84 (Sensitive Lands) of the Code will be satisfied • during the Sensitive Lands review process with the Hearings • Officer. It should be noted that it is possible that the site plan will need minor revision as a result of this review. 4. Chapter 18.100 (Landscaping and Screening) of the C is satisfied except for Section 18.100.130 which requires a 20 foot iiP wide landscaped buffer when adjacent to an R--4.5 ton . The loading area for the Costco store practically abuts the • + residential property to the west. The relevant criteria for granting a Zone Change for the parcel on the southeast side of Ash Street are Statewide Planning Gi::,ats 1 and 2 and Section 18.66.030 of the Community Development Code. The Planning Commission concludes that the proposal is consistent with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines based upon the findings below: 1.. Goal # 1 is met because the City has adopted a Citizens Involvement program including review of all development applications by the Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPb). In • addition; all public notice requirements were met. 2. Goal # 2 is met because the City applied all applicable Statewide • • Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan Policies and Development code requirements to the application. • The Planning Commission concludes that the proposal is consistent With the applicable standards in the Community Development Code based upon p' the follo Ting findings • ` t b ' E ti PI'�"N�{ {� /{{��yy y9��rr)) N�+�y 85-, 07 P}y C�•�, a. Pb j�� } .-8 ' - AC C LIV��J O�1JL:4[1 lVV i „ PC t U 1435 ll U�y � V� ��li8 . . ,, 1 ,.,. 1. Section 18.66.030 of the Code indicates that the subject property as well as the other nearby parcels zoned R-12 (PD) shall be . , developed in accordance with the provisions of the R-12 zone. The R-12 zone does allow for parking facilities as a conditional use. 2. However, the Code does not allow grading to be done in the flood • plain. By limiting the Commercial Use of the parcel to parking, the intent of the Code will not be compromised. A Sensitive Lands Permit must be issued prior to construction of the parking lot. C. DECISION i . . Based upon the above findings and conclusions, the Planning Commission grants Conceptual Plan approval of PD 1-85 subject to the following conditions: 1. Sensitive Lands approval Will be required for all grading and I1 f improvements within the 100 year flood plain. A Sensitive Lands ' , , s „ approval shall be obtained before the Detailed Plan is submitted •. 9,- for review. Ip 2. The grading of the entire site, including the area within the a ,i 100-year flood plain, shall be reviewed by the Park Board. The N location of the p'destrian/bicycle path shall also be reviewed by 4r. the Park Board prior to final approval of a design. ,; , ` r ' 'I _I ' 3. , e w. ,tom- Det- led Plante nd the „k;...- It is the Commission's desire.to" view thes,m=. Sensitive Lands.-ap 4lica,tion. The Planning Dire, for_,shall .,oirm ' '•` whether o ,.ndt the Code will allow this. 4. A Detailed Plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director or Planning Commission (depending upon the Director's findings in condition 2 above) for approval that is in conformance with the requirements in 18.80 of the Code. In addition, said plan shall include the following information or modifications: • a. Buffering and screening consistent with Section 18.80.120 • . (a) (3) (B) and Chapter 18.100 of the Code. • b. Identification and location of noise sources within the western portion of the project and a, nmethod for shielding ` adjoining residences from eac,cesslve noise impacts. c. The landscaping plan for the development shall preserve as many trees over six inch caliper on the site as practical. 5. Specific conditions relating to pobl .c ,improvements shall be . I applied upon Detailed Plan approval. • 6. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date. r • l'. P A PINAL ORDER NO, 85--0.7�,�,, PC - Pb 1-=85 & 20 5485 - PAGE 6 . r • w,rr.w y. f ,,, F 1� • 4 Based upon the above findings and conclusions, the Planning Commission approves ZC 5-85 subject to the following condition: 1. A Deed Restriction shall be placed upon, the parcel (1S1 2DB, ''•' TL 300) limiting the. Commercial Use of the property to parking. It is further ordered that the applicant be notified of the entry of this order. PASSED: This ,,,) day of 1985, by the Planning Commission . of the City of Tigard. A. Donald Moen, President Tigard Planning Commission } (1136P/dmj) JA • $ FINAL 0088 NO. 85- CZ,,• PC - Pb 1.55 & 20 5-85 - i ACS 7 DATP:a . isp... s 41111016, TIGARD PLANK NG COMMI S S ION r r, .� NOTICE: ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN THEIR NAME and note\ their address, on this sheet. (Please Print your name) . _____e_mi . ITEM A.1ESCRIPTION s, M 4_________Sj:___eei"----'+'"----- ____Co) . 421, i ft PROPONENT (For) OPPONENT (against) Name, Address and Affiliation i j Name, Address and Affiliation e/k.f4 '' 14 i / -4,, (. , 1' 1 i C. J f,9 b.t .12 L1,. 6 ., )•t ply m d,66/5„, tai' . -� v�-� �-' p� �/ Gt a �.l o w/.4c,c .oh) 13t� S . . s . pi , h `giv,01/1- •ferA Wore l i . ei idk 19 . . , a- 0 ",/le 1 1 alikiiih.,0 I C ' ' \/ 4- .6L i e 11 ,,e‘iq. 1/43 A 1.9— g,co, 11-51 tO-12- , .. 4-,- , . .....,,,,/ 4.e v e re, - e:ife l ' cOr SL 0-ak. ,, L j. . .. •�rrrlrlrrl.R n J 1 ■ TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING -- APRIL 2, 1985 1, President Moen called the meeting to order at 7:34 PM. The meeting was held at Fowler Junior High LGI Room •- 10865 SW Walnut. l 2. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: President Moen; Commissioner Butler Fyre, Underwood, Bergmann, Campbell, Leverett, Peterson, and Owens (arrived 7:45 P.M.) STAFF: Director of Community Development William A. Monahan; Associate Planner Keith S. Liden; Secretary Diane M. Jelderks, 3, APPROVAL OF MINUTES * Commissioner Vanderwood moved and Commissioner Campbell seconded to approve minutes as submitted, Motion carried unanimously: • 4, COMMISSION COMMUNICATION Director of Community Development Monahan explained that it is necessary to hold a second hearing on April 16, 1985, because of the number of the Comprehensive Plan Applications which need processing. Also, a brochure printed by the Tigard Chamber of Commerce was distributed. Five letters were distributed for Agenda item 5.6, Main Street Land Corp: 5, PUBLIC HEARINGS 5,1 SUBDIVISION S 2-85 and VARIANCE V 1-85 MAWNIRTER NPO U 6i* Request for preliminary plat approval for a six lot sUbdiVision and to allow two 7,125 square foot lots Where a minimum of 7,500 square feet is required, Located 9680 SW McDonald St. ( HiTM ZS1 11 lots 104 and 200), Associate Planner Liden reviewed the status of the application and 'made Ataff's recommendation for approval with i1 conditions, APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Vern . Portland, representing the applicant that Frank Lentz, 01.50 e, city L '_ 0 SW 89th, requested Weer, address the issues regat�x�ing access onto y Vii I McDonnld and the need for the approval of the variance, Prank C Jrrie stated that if the Variance Was denied it still Would not the number of driveways onto McDonald, He explained the alignment a • � alignment.the existing r�iU� ed that ae special circumstances iA�io�lvad with that alig 4 n additional condition be added the negotiations for cohd0 nation of ri ht,,of. a He .dd to which would release the applicant from an legal ramifications eclat ° negotiations , . g.., y� also explained the m N d 1°fehAnce between public °a�ataements and rah dedications. PLANNING COMMISSION MXNUTIS April 2, 1.906 Page 1 • 674, e, o Joe 1/an Lom, Architect, 34 NW 1st, Portland, stated that the applicants primary concern was buffering. Presently their is nothing in the Code to protect this residential use from the commercial use. He was also concern with therioise problems which would be created with commercial development. o JB Bishop, 10505 SW Barbur, Suite 303, opposed the zone change from residential, He stated at the properties were not very wide and CSD to needed the ability to build th with 10 feet of the property lane, He reviewed the history of Mr, Allison site and added that they would be providing adequate buffering through the PD requirement, REBUTTAL o Mr, Allison stated that the Code was designed to protect people and felt his tenants should be protected with a 30 ft, setback, , which is what Would be required between a commercial and residential zone. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED 0 Discussion '/ u s�.on fiollowed With staff on how the a�.te had become zoned CBD Commissioner F re moved and Commissioner Vanderwood seconded canded t o forward CPA 1-85 and ZC 1-85 to City Council with recommendation for approval, Motion carried by majority vote: Commissioner Leverett, Campbell, and Bergmann voted ho. 5,6 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PD 1--85 & ZONE CHANGE ZC 5 =85 MAIN STREET LAND Or Request for Conceptual Plan approval fora 221,000 square foot retail _el center on a 20,3 acre -property ert and for a Zone Change from R-12 D p p y g (P ) Residential, 12 units/acre) to CBD (Central Business District) for a 3,19 acre parcel on the southeast side of Ash Street, Associate Planner Liden reviewed the project and made staff's recommendation for Conceptual approval of the Planned Development and denial of the Zone Change, APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o JB Bishop, 10505 SW Barber, Suite 303, reviewed the history of the project. He expressed his heed to hava the Zone Change to alloW employee parking as well as parking for the Eahho Creek Parke He also explained why he heed Conceptual approval tonight, otherwise there would be no project, • o Grigsby Christopher, of brun, Moreland, Christopher Architects, reviewed the layout of the project and the design features used to protect the abutting property owhers, o J8 Bishop continued that they would be applying for a Sensitive Lands Permit, Also, the project has more land, however, the ratio of land bo parkin is decreased has well as ratio of retail space to land has descr rased, PLANNING COMMXSSXON MIN UM April 2, 1085 Page 5 • t r / o Dave Larson, McKenzie, Saito Engineering, was available to answer engineering questions, .o Kevin Langford, Costco, stated that the Costco would be hiring 160 employees, 55 % fula., time and 45 % part time Also they would only be making deliveries between the hours of 7;00 AM and 1,00 PM only Monday through Friday, Commissioner Owens left 1200 midnight PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Carolyn Eadon, representing NPO 1 1, explained that the NPO only reviewed this project last Friday night: They had voted 4 to 0 with one abstention against the zone change and voted 2 to 2 with one abstention for conceptional approvAl, They requested that a condition be placed in the staff repoiht that the 6 foot fence between the residential and commercial area be in place prier to construction, Their other concerns were for the barrier on Ash street being removed, they felt the Commec'cial area should be kept isolated, and that the streets should have sidewalks and bikepath, o Discussion followed among Commission as to whether the hearing should be set over . d President Moen moved and Commissioner Owens seconded to set the meeting over to a date certain. Motion failed, Commissioner Leverett, Campbell Vanderwood, tyre, and Butler voting no, o Discussion followed regarding the zone change, , o Associate Planner Liden reviewed concerns from Commissioner Butler • regarding Park issues, He reviewed letter from Mr & Mrs, McBath, Mrs, & Mrs, Saub, Mr, & Mrs, Johnson, and Bruce Clark of the Economic Development Committee, 9., a• Jeanne Caswell, Tigard Chamber of Commerce, supported the proposal for three reasons, 1, Coal identifted by Chamber and Economic Development is to establish a heartland for the community; 2, Costco provide employment,l.b ment+ide consumers cost savings; and 3, Would provide p y The y also supported the zone change because it would provide parking for the park and would give the city more park land, o Gloria Johnson, �80O Hill Street, opposed the zo ne change, She stated they had Fought hard to get the property zone d R-12 and wanted it maintained, She was concerned about the project' s traffic flow, air quality, and noise factor, o Emmet Whitaker, 13250 5W Surf-thaw Ct, , stated that the Costco has limited membership, which would not provide shopping for all residents, Also, the average ago of employee of Costco are college age or younger, 'He was also, concerned about the noise and traffic circulation, PLANNXNC t c 1MtSStON MttJtii1 5 April 2, On Page 7 , a J. L. Gehrong, 13215 Ski Ash Drive, has been a resident for 19 years there would be adequate buffering between the tl and wanted to be sure h q single family and commercial zone. He did not want to see Ash Ave, extended; REBUTTAL a JB' Bishop reviewed the design of the project and how they were protecting the single family neighborhood with buffering, Also they would be installing sidewalks on Ash, The Ash Ave, would not be removed, other things had to occur before that could happen. He reference the DEQ report and added that the loading would take place at least 50 or more feet from the single family residential, PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Commissioner Leverett, Campbell., Fyre, Vanderwood, Bergmann, and Peterson, favored conceptual approval and approval of the zone change with a deed restriction that it could only be developed as parking, o Commissioner Butler opposed the zone change, and favored the Planned Development, o Commissioner Moen opposed the Planned Development as lacking vision, He favored the previous approval. He felt they were right back to the big box and the sea of cement concept, 1 # Commissioner Vanderwood moved and Commissioner Leverett seconded to approved conceptual approval of PD 1-85, adding the condition at the the issues of grading shall be addressed with the Park Board and location of the pedestrian bike path Would be coordinated, Motion carried by majority vote, Commissioners Fyre and Moen voting no, Commissioner Campbell moved and Commissioner ssioner Leverett seconded to p , .., approved ZC 5-85 with a Deed Restriction to limit the use of the -parcel to parking based finding that it meets the statewide goals and section 18,66,030 of the Community Development Code,• Motion carried by majority vote, Commissioner Butler, Moen, Fyre voting no 6, OTHER BUSINESS . 7, AbtOURNMENT 1:0O AM Secretary Diane M, elderks ATTEST! A. Donald Moen, President� 1 1.J.C72P ti PLA WINO COMM OION MINUTES April 2, 1985 Pago 8. STAFF REPORT A AGENDA ITEM 5.6 April 2, 1985 --- 7:30 P.M. TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL - LGI l 10865 S.W. WALNUT TIGARD, OREGON 97223 A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: Planned Development PD 1-85 and Zone Change ZC 5-85 REQUEST: For Conceptual Plan approval for a 221,000 square foot retail center on a 20.3 acre property and for a Zone Change from R-12 (PD) Residential, 12 units/acre) to CBD (Central Business District) for a 3.19 acre parcel on the southeast side of Ash Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Central Business District ZONING DESIGNATION: CBD (Central Business District) and R-12(PD) (Residential, 12 units/acre, planned development) APPLICANT: Main Street Land Corp. OWNER: Same Suite 303, 10505 SW Barbur Blvd. Portland, Oregon 97219 LOCATION: Southwest corner of Main Street and Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2CC, Tax Lot 1200, 1300, 1400, 1500, 1600, 2200, 2300, 2301, 201 and 2S1 2DB, 500). 2. Background On April 26, 1982, the City Council granted Preliminary and General Plan approval as well as a Sensitive Lands Permit for the Main Street project (CPR 8-81, CPR 9-=81, and M 2-81). The proposal included approximately 16 acres of land and 174,000 gross square feet of building area. 3. Vicinity Information The property to the east is designated as greenway in the Comprehensive Plan and is the site of F P Y he southwest and south are honed BD Park. The properties the Downtown Fenno Creek Pa developed �. p g.. , R-4.5 and R-12(PD) and are to the � o ed with single and multi-family residences: The properties along Main Street ar G G Pacific devoted d to c near ' the north end of the project are zoned CBD ommercial uses. STAPP REPORT - PD 1-85 & ZC 5-85 - PAGE 1 • •t r , 4. Site Information and Proposal Desc_ripvion This site is vacant except for two buildings which will be removed prior f, to development. Fanno Creek runs through the eastern section of the property and approximately five acres of the site lie within the 100 year flood plain. The 1982 plan concept has been revised to include a parcel on the 1' • • southeast side of Ash Street and one other small parcel for a total of ' 20.3 acres. The total gross floor space of this commercial project will be approximately 221,000 square feet. The project is to be completed in three phases with a large retail store (113,000 square feet) and the public improvements, including an extension of Ash Street through the project to Pacific Highway ., representing the first phase. A second access to Main Street is also proposed. The parcel on the opposite side of Ash Street is intended to • • be rezoned from R-12 (PD) to CBD and developed as a parking lot. Since the project will involve some filling and excavation, a Sensitive Lands approval will be necessary. This aspect of the development will be reviewed at a public hearing wir.h the Hearings Officer. 5. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division has the following comments: ' a. The proposed access is in general conformance with the previously approved plan. b. The detailed' plan should discourage or eliminate parking on the Ash Street extension and the street leading to Main Street.. c. The Ash Street extension should )e designed to discourage through traffic into the neighborhood. d. A 900 intersection should be provided for the dead end street that will eventually cross Fanno Creek and join Ash Street on the other side. e. The revised plan will require the approval of a Sensitive Lando permit from the hearings Officer. f. A landscaped buffer should be provided along the street connecting P provided along Ash Street and Pacific Highway to screen the shopping center from I Panno Creek Park. The Building Inspection Office has no objection to the propoaal. The State Uighway Divis� approved n c on Fific Highway, Addition al c omme nts by shall be at the . hearing. �! F ! , 11 •S STAP1 WORT • PD 1==85 & 2C 5-55 - PACS 2 .. .... ,.„ .. ....,„,._.. ..., ,m ,.._....,.•...m,.,,i,,,.,..,,. , ,.,....,..,,...„. u,, .,, ...r.r„ c.... M,r, ,,., . .i_.,,,.,,n,.r; r ,. .._� , .'.J':.. -.«s.,.:,t.Y.,)., :V,.,.'L 4:'Y;ta*r,11.,M;z...vi • ----•;-,"x.11,4.. 4 , • A.. The Tualatin Rural Fire Protection Distridt has the following comments: a. The barrier at Ash Street should be breakable to allow for lr:; emergency access. b. The driveway on Main Street should allow for inbound traffic. The Park Board has no objection to the proposal. Comments have not been received from NPO # 1. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria for granting conceptual plan approval in this case ;. are Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 5, 7, 8, and 9; Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.4.2, 3.5.3, 5.1.1, 5.1.3, 6.3.3, 6.6.1, 7.2.1, 8.1.3, 11.2.1, 11.2.2 and 11.2.3; and Community Development Code chapters 18.66, 18.80, 18.84, and 18.100. ; r The Planning staff concludes that the proposal is consistent with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines based upon the following findings: 1. Goal # 1 is met because the City has adopted a Citizens Involvement program including review of all development applications by the Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO). In addition, all public notice requirements were met. • 2. Goal // 2 is met because the City applied all applicable Statewide . Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan Policies and Development code requirements to the application. . . 3. Goals # 5 and Ii 7 will be addressed during the Sensitive Lands review of the project. 4. Goal // 8 is satisfied because the site plan is compatible with the Fanno Creek Park Plan: The Park Board has reviewed the proposal and no objections were raised. 5. Goal /1 9 is satisfied because the development will have a positive economic impact upon the downtown area. The Planning staff has determined that the proposal, with several Modifications, 18 consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted below: r 1. Plan Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and opportunity to comment on the applicants proposal. 2. Plan Policies 3.2.1 3:2.2, 3.2.3, 3.4.2, 3.5.3, and 7.2.1 shall be reviewed, as part of the Sensitive Lands permit process. STAFF REPORT - PD 1-85 & EC 5-85 - PAGE 3 • - 3. Plan Policies x.1.1. and 5.1.3 are satisfied because this • commercial center will have a positive affect upon the local job market and it will contribute towards establishing the downtown as the viable core area for the community. 4. Plan Policy 6.3.3 is not completely satisfied because the downtown is considered to be an "Established Area" and development occuring within the area is intended to preserve and enhance the character of these areas. The proposed site plan does not provide sufficient setbacks and/or buffering adjacent to some of the existing residential uses and therefore the project would have a detrimental impact upon these properties. 5. Plan Policy 6.6.1 is not satisfied because no buffering is shown on the site plan between some of the commercial structures and /,,. . adjacent residential buildings. Modifications to correct this deficiency are noted below. 6. Plan Policy 8.1.3 will be satisfied during the detailed plan and constructed phases of the development. The public streets within the project will require a 50 foot wide right-of-way and a 32 foot wide roadway. 7. Plan Policies 11.2.1, 11.2.2 and 11.2.3 are satisfied because the site plan includes the extension of Ash Street to the eastern • boundary of the project and a temporary barricade will be installed near Hill Street. This obstruction will be removed in accordance with Policy 11.2.3. The Planning staff concludes that with the modifications noted, the proposal satisfies the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon the findings listed below: 1. Chapter 18.66 (CBD Zone) of the Code is satisfied because the proposal meets the minimum standards relating to setbacks, lot coverage, and building height. 2 Chapter 18.80 (Planned Development) of the Code is satisfied except for Section 18.804110 (c)(3) and 18.80.120 (a)(3) . The staff understands that extensive grading will be necessary on the site but a generalized grading concept has not been submitted: The grading proposed in the flood plain may be reviewed during the Sensitive Lands review. The land form alteration to be done on the remainder of the site is critical for conceptual review in order to determine the relationship between the new commercial buildings and the residences to the south and west. Section 18.80.120 ) ( ) ' l 8.80:.120 a 3 is not satisfied because in some cases, no landscaping or visual buffering is shown between the commercial buildings and nearby residential uses. of particular concern are visual impact and the noise from loading areas and 3TAV? REPORT Pb 1. 85 & 2C 5-85 - PACE 4 .. 5 • • building ventilation systems.. Additional information must be submitted to illustrate how these negative impacts will be mitigated. The site contains several large fir trees and one significant cluster of trees on the western boundary of the project near. Pacific Village Apartments. Section 18.80.120 (a) (3) of the Code requires that trees with a six inch caliper or greater be saved whenever possible. The proposed site plan indicates that all existing trees will be removed. The plan should be revised to save as many of these larger trees as possible. This is particularly true of the trees along the western boundary of the project because of their usefulness as P leeJscaped buffer. Finally, the requirements for landscaping; and screening will vary ': depending upon the decision that is made regarding CPA l•-85/ZC 1-85 for Pacific Village Apartments. 3. Chapter 18.84 (Sensitive Lands) of the Code will be satisfied during the Sensitive Lands review process with the Hearings Officer. It should be noted that it is possible that the site plan will need minor revision as a result of this review. O 4. Chapter 18.100 (Landscaping and Screening) of the Code is satisfied except for Section 18.100.130 which requires a 20 foot • wide landscaped buffer when adjacent to an R-4.5 zone. The loading area for the Costco store practically abuts the residential property to the west. The relevant criteria for granting a Zone Change for the parcel on the southeast side of Ash Street are Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2 and Section 18.66.030 of the Community Development Code, The Planning staff concludes that the proposal is consistent with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines based upon the findings below!. 1. Goal # 1 is met because the City has adopted a Citizens Involvement program including review of all development applications by the Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO). In addition, all public notice requiicement y were met. j 2. Goal 1/ 2 is met because the City applied all applicable Statewide Planning Goals , City Comprehensive Plan Policies and Planning , y y p Development code requirements to the application. The Planning Staff concludes that the proposal is not consistent with the applicable standards it the Community Development Code based upon • the followin gfindings. + V ^ 0 1 ... y �� STAr><j Pgp'ORT :� Pb 1-85 & F�C 5-85 pAGb 5 • '•e t. v.- y • •. , .. 1. Section 18,,66.030 of the Code -indfbates that the subject property I' as well as the other nearby parcels zoned R-12 (PD) shall be • developed in accordance with the provisions of the R-12 zone. A • rezoning to CBD would conflict with this provision of the Code. 2. The R-12 zone does allow for parking facilities as a conditional use. The parking lot proposal could be reviewed as a Conditional Use "along with the Sensitive Lands issue before the Hearings Officer. C. RECOMMENDATION • Based upon the above findings and conclusions, the Planning staff recommends Conceptual Plan approval of PD 1--85 subject to the following conditions: 1. Sensitive Lands approval will be required for all grading and improvements within the 100 year flood plain. A Sensitive Lands approval shall be obtained before the Detailed Plan is submitted for review. 2. A Detailed Plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for- approval that is in conformance with the requirements in 18.80 of the Code. In addition, said plan shall include the following information or modifications: a. Buffering and screening consistent with Section 18.80.120 • • (a) (3) (B) and Chapter 18.100 of the Code. b. Identification and location of noise sources within the western portion of the project and a method for shielding adjoining residences from excessive noise impacts. i c. The landscaping plan for the development shall preserve as • litany trees over six inch caliper on the site as practical. • 3. Specific conditions relating to public improvements shall be • applied upon Detailed Plan approval. 4. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date. • Based upon the above findings and conclusions, the Planning staff recommends denial of 2C 5-85. . e*I. `"' e;a:grow. / _• r PREPARED B Keith Liden APPRPR OVE ...l D D BY: Williaa m A. Monahan Associate Planner Director of Planning & Development (1156?/dmj) • STAPP REPORT Pb 1-85 & 2C 5 -85 1A08 6 I e 1 1 it 1 . • N O T I C E O F P U B L I C H E A R I N G Notice is hereby given that the Tigard Planning Commission, at its meeting on Tuesday, April 2, 1985 at 7:30 P.M. , in the lecture room of Fowler Junior High School, 10865 S.W. Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon, will consider the follow'Lng application: FILE NUMBER: PD 1-85 acid ZC 5-85 APPLICANT: J B Bishop OWNER: Same Main Street Land Corporation 10505 SW Barbur Blvd. S-303 Portland, Oregon 97219 REQUEST: For conceptual and detailed planned development approval for a 228,000 Square foot retail center and related facilities on a 21.8 acre parcel. Property is zoned CBD (PD) (Central Business District, Planned Development), and R-12 (Residential 12 units/ • acre.) . A sign code exception is requested to allow 3 freestanding signs where two are permitted. Also, a zone change from R-12 to CBD (PD) is requested for the western portion of Tax Lot 300 of Tax Map 251 2DB. LOCATION: On the southwest corner of Main Street and Pacific Hwy. (Wash. Co. Tags Map 2S1 2AC, Lots 1200, 1300, 1400, 1500, 1600, 2200, 2300, 2301 , and 201 ; Map 2S1 2DB, Lots 300 and 301) . (See map on reverse side) The publld hearing on this matter will be conducted Develoment accordance and rules the of rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Community Development Code procedure of the Planning Commission. Any persons having interest in this matter may attend and be heard, or testimony may be submitted in writing to be entered into the record of the initial hearing. For further information please contact the Planning Department at 639-4111. TIGARD CITY HALL, 12755 8.W. Ash Avenue (Corner of Ash Avenue & Burnham treet), or contact your Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO) # Chairperson ., far t t Phone Dumber 2026 a enin s (pm/0.2570) . . -----------y,-,-----_----__ __ „ . . , ,. . . . . • . . „, . ,............. .„........... L.., .... . L i 41ii0 t,o,,,,.4 4 4*.,. ? 1,. ,,',,.„, / ...4 z\.. •,- .\101,'1p 1 .: 7 1 •, I,, • • ,**V '..., . . ->;,"••*, ' . ,/ „/ 4x7,,,,' i'.,/ ,• ,(<, 44,,, , .' ' \ ' ,... /4" • ‘44\c,,\\ . ,, LN''.i. A. ,-P' ,,,, • , 44, ' -......_ - . . ' .., r/ :,., <,,, , k .,. , ..,\,/,:. .., , ... „,, , ,,, / .. -,,,..„. , ., . „,.. . .. . , , \ J .. ..- .. . ,, \ r ?'. Al , i \ \\ \\I N, e. \ 4-..;27:* , ' '' \ \ • , A * ■ . /,PL , i i "a le -4. -.>1 - TIGAR 11 1`• . Nr.4(`' . .: \ / 1111 .,,,do” y, ,,,,, 4'4.* ,, , ' . ,,,,,• . , 1 \ \ di 4 ' + ' IV. '''4, '' •. n .. .. II _ ,,,,, .,,,, , , , ,,, N ,..,4., / , ,,,,.. ....4,,..„ ,4, „,. . , , .<'',., > - \X. \r" \., .. . .--.. A et, t, tY , t. 1 11111 ' 1! 0 ' / '1/4.....--..1 1 4., t \ i , - ',,,, * /A 'y '. . 1-4 ,t. Ito c'-' ,'' IC ST/1 E L , -`"`•..z ,..\ \\::(e „,,/ 4,, .,, ' V °I - r.‘ ( 7-1 I T I L ''' if 1 '' AP, Yk.0 / -,..,.._.) ) c. i r , •r:‘,4 ,.4 L Ape\ c • ., 1 4.. ...--1 0 N,,,t', if • ', . \ / ,,,..S...1lAt," 44.4., ' H(.(‘.......„4:3„... 4 ■ ■{',.. ,, I ..• .. , 4 ( x 1 ,t;' ., .,.1k:0 ilik:›10t (\ ,,....4 ,..... 7. ). ' I.. 5ThEer:.....= 1 • ''' I (,- ..e 0'4,4,444,k , • 1.4 —4,4 (:' .4 ! ' •7J` '4 4 - . w 4, . C yip.., ' , 7.. ' I, . ')'.-'iD MI ..... 1, . ,. ,... \, ',, 7c....\....,, 1 ' 1 ' .__ _‘\ , ' II,. 1 11 ' 1 ,, , .P, ,- . . 0 EW 0 ' s. 1 ; ' 'N ., ' .> ,, . • ' I - , . 1 (11- •. ,.:,./. . 1 i: r ' ! !' t% . .'. . --f -1-1 , 1 1 . ... 4. , . „„.,_a., itit t ..!:\ "An.t.ilkW ' 5 W: ---Xj to r .---'4t, N \:;4/'`"r•--1-- --. t 1 '1 * • , 1 , ' . 1 1 ; . • -\ `4, L , \ L. . , ,... . hi,.: ' 1 \.. -\› ,c, ' 1 1 -, _, ; .. , ., .4,. 4 4 4 1 1 f / L 1 ' i • t iii4tE4 L.....I __ . ' I 2 1 i • I • - • 2' ' i I i r''' '1 - _,._ _ _ . .' ' ' L-J6aa.61J" Ai6 ,_..i. a___Y il 2 . .., .,. .... ' ---'—', 1 I.177 --7-1 1 '' NM ! ' 1 i. . ' 1 t " INiii.t.111( swit.,i wr,., - . / ,•/ , ' --- I ' , .I i . y i kl..i410 5 f' lf . • 1 , li I u, . .' ..p r; 44i , ,/ .,i i 4 . 4' 1 I 1.111. . , ... a -', „1 F I. ■ , .,. . I ,.1friikh.,../ _v1, ! , , ., i '1 ......„ ,,,, ,, #4k ("Tim -7_;:-,, :!% , 1 .: I I r ' , . h , 4 ..., r , 'Al ,vicyi i ..? 1 ' 'Is WI6tirtkA.2 i N . ' : ( . ! x i liEho :31 ,, ,....,4,: ,.,,,,4.1:k get k , r. . .... ..,.. ok . , W ., ''US,. . tril ".'\ ' . .,4-4 • i ' 3 , 1 L 1 1 •1 4,44 1 1 .,„ fl . 6 . a_......1. —. . . • . I 1 7....10±.4i 1 4... -1' i +-r n t - s'44 111 ITT", . 4,...., .--,_,,-__ - F- , , zi, i , , , i . , 1. , ,, • ,I LI L LANC ii J I I - — 1 . f.. ,„,.. „, , lipitti c„,k1 i. oi ,1 5.k.iitt4ti 1, TWALI TY , i - . r • . i'l . . . , - it, - . l, ,, , ; .,:i[ i' • '1 " -0 6 i6 1204914 OUpc_ JR, HIGH r...,-T I-... 4..t... \VI , i $, $ k • % t '':t i: 1 ,tii i _. , ,,i ult...., . ` .74j, ' "1:47-141:,± ,..]. !4 k 1 • ii , 'X 4:, .^ 4,',':I .fi j I I 1 1 ,, 7777 ' \ 1 i 1'E MP E'L TO NI 1 'k7",.] r:li$1 I ,{ I 4■• E L E M. --,:i i. •1i ' - r i „, . 444,14.4. Kit_ 'it, .....,•' - ' . . ,c4 . , Sc H 0 0 L :k , 1, , „t 1, ..i, 111(4! I -i. — '0 4. 1 . . 4 .„ezi,,,,_ r SI . I r.1 ) . 4 , 1. kr.4 , ,, 4. . * '''.g r, 'J 1.-.--Lt.1.11f!....••LI—;4.,..i...,J..,..1. t- * , .i.P.i ...,. -..) ..-...,... ....,,....”‘,,,_, ..--,,,-....201_ .".,...t.:.:, ....:.......L....... • , _„, . .. -.... , ..T 44.-s- 4 t ti, , 44. .0 et ',6 0•+, 11.40601' ' i v41S-. ' t - t- ' 1 r ^ ,i ,fj 1 114 tAktil '''' . , . t 44,, ,, ' t 1" r ' ' .'': ''''N' 1., • '"1 ; 4., At El . ■ A AJtAtidit i, . At.ii,„ :di A ill k I, IC,,,, !:-A., . t(IL"llitl.. "*, .,„ r' 0 4 . `I I ' ..) io 1 `: '',,.• 1 \'1 444'' ' ....1 ILI , I. „ 1 ' i ' t 1 1 ' , I- 1,. . { I Li i II lijk!ii i it 4 ,..,,, , .,. * , ' t s -41r-r4r-tv-: 1 frf,„, 1 i t..i . di \ ! ‘ ,.. .. . _ ...,......._. „ .,. . , i'. . • . , . . . .. • '' .. • A :A• •. . .. , '...................,,................ ... . S.....,......,.......................................................,.........„...................„.......... ""........................... • ■ 41 . , . ■, ...., .. ^' • . . - . . , * •,_ „ ._ ., , . . , ,. 1 -, . • ■ ,. , .. ■ .. , . . 'Cr . , , . , ,, t 0: ILI.'I\' . . , , ... ,. . . Cr ' . :7:N\''•\ • ... , . .. ... . . . . ..) . •. 4., cr L ) .6,i,•-• .1.,1A § . iii; . . ., , §1 ....II..,,-.'' )i, ,,,..:,.,,, \,..•..... . .. 1.....1'' ..;% • '), \\ 14' I t cc, „ . . ....,. 7., •. „•,,,,„ It 1 (4 \< 1 . : .tk.,,!', .,•':,■:. ,...)...; itt, R i , Imilik.. :'..” 1 , ' i iv. \:71., ' Az :.,,', ,' .,.` ' $ ,*"., ."''' , % o • ';`‘, ..\.• .,...,,,.,..' . ., z gi . . v. ..,,., . ?, ..:-,:....:::.. .-,,,,,,,,ii■ , .... .N., ' „ )' ..... - , .--......7.,,,..N., $.,,:', -th- .„.,f,0.•,::..--i,,,,r \•,\., lit II y 1 . ..,4,;rc•-•-'.”- \,. . ..- '',:.';1',':I.g,;;..:.:...."•0;,,,,;5,:,- ..4.-e;;;:. . w ' •''ca-4..(..:''7 ' NJ 14'11 ' ' • •. k ,,,"...;,.,/,,,),',1. . 4 ,i,:,',, ,,,\ .• -....,z•!trig ... ,,,,,.,,,, 4 .,,,,4,,,,./ -,,, •.v ,:',....,;.,:::.:,,,, iti% .,, .0 ,-,' :.4. - • ic,. • ,...-., ‘ .. , • : ''' ,r '''',1'f':;.':::::',Y,'/,:.;:%. ' 1 :,1::::+g:,■;.: 4: ., 4." 0 6 ,." ,' ,v,', 0 ' , . . . 444.4...:..:,,,, ,;:;;`,%,, ,,;;:: .`:, .. , ;;t:::■,:' . "e, Vitlf, ,d.:"-",=.,' '. CC ., L q . •>, -,„•, -,' 1 ',. , L 44,.:;!:.?;;;:,"!MII.. 44% .%•1. ,•er ,. -''' kJ , , , 1 ,,, 4., -, .hp ., :,q :tti,o,,.,c41,16.1,, ii... . , • itiO . . , o . ,,. ,.,,, „... ' ' . 0. . ,,. .• ' • '',,,,,,.:.:,..,:. 774,__ ,,,.:.:s..,..._ii;r. . ,/i''Z''' '' '. • '" .'. ' '',:j4;;;.■..1, .' '''''''!'",;''.01'.'4*'"ir--• ''''''744.4ikoi slt-Eas . '''''' '..* ...2 1 . , If,-11,-44,.1 I., .........I4,;71(,-....S.s. It.l',.., . ,(101V444.1.,-„, • '' ''.. ' ...• . ; ',":.\,,. IZ .. ...v. ,.<,,, , ewer-,_;,-.7:7'-..-.= 'lkl,.,7., .\'‘;',,i 1, '7.17.,•:':‘"; ‘;.`„;c' 0 ,,I, ,l.' • • . I ,, ...... . , ::"< ‘ 1,,1 Ie. \Ne , •i ; 4' .\\,' ' ,) ' Se 1' I'l& . ,,•41(0,j... '* ' ( CC .'' : , -I'. ,.,'',. .' \ ';'• ' •;\, g ''qw ' *.v,—. L. ‘,.....,;t i ICC ,„, . , .„,1/4. \ me ' . -I. ., --,,.,,, ., -,) * \ \\,,'. "‘ 4, t'i .,' ).',..:.,:/' 7' ■'., ---..\.....„L., , It , . ? It: .t.„ \r,,,,,,,,,, , 11....) T1, :, . , *.;;;., '!,, 4. ' ' , ',.-.-Le' :'; \ , k ' I''''':',...'' ' . • • .'' 1 ,. ...• ....* .............T ,\\.., .. „441.'10:4t,, ;,,,, '..,•.„, ..`:..; 11 , . Iki • . '' 4,„ecit,..r. *":,. I, , . . ' ' iti:II\t- '-'"---"----------- --...--..;111 '•'7,;':::',!"''':&,,,,„„,.._ _..,,.. ....„%lt'X''''.,";4;111.. 1 * . At' o;''.”. ,-p r:,■,-;#,,,.,,,,:::;','%;,;, ,, ViV.411;1'#. r /all . : 1,1 il 1---------- --"':-.------7----------__ ---7----j I,r`,7.e.1.,,4.4:4'..1."'''''41:."'"414:A3:Pdfi.:11 • , . , . ,, , ,4.',,!;1';';,,,:,:, ..,.:14. , . . ''1. '--..-7---- - . ,"- ,,,..'.','; ..'.11:::;;;;;O:*i,N .;,',.1 ,.' .u,:!.-.r.' . .,, '," ,„,„,... 6 i:;.. .. g i ,,,e', V'41: ,../I ,.',?(ii'lls), '', / '4 ... - .r..,r„ :?».t '5;.....,... ;!'......f4.„.". ,..,/ C i irizjC3,..., ... 1 0 --i'.2,...,,',,,;:',,,:" Fte?'' •..-,,....,,,,„e4, te!''.;''d'1 -,' . . / . . t.7 IF /,.....: :,/ ,:k.'ramit -----------'1 . , , rAllirtr.'----,.. 4 0- i„g. ,;:ti,:.L.-';_41,0/ M.. ....,411..-s . . , '..j4.1.'". ., Hiliwi ftyliof • -.-1-,-':_,_L.-..-.4-1 /40'.--• ,,.; ,4:■,,' . lg 14'1 a , 4,.. :..,: ,.,.., ' . :;111 qui.% ..,.#0,;fit.2„,;/140 ...... ge .I.,,,,,,41,1m:,,:, !,,...,..,.• .. ...,,,,.:,t,,:gtt. (—._ t:' L 4 .' ..:..-.. Z ty ,1' a■ ,11,""-.-..........,,,...- / „ ....It;,;,.,,,,.;, . 1 ' 4 fSP4' ' 1 ' - ir, ...-.,- 3", a V 74.9 l....“*-144'*,, ..,4' I ''' ; ,,,5 .. • JO il I 01411411# 0, r•-•-• minklaa . , lii 4 ,„..•, 1.. t., ife• fb, t... ,. ...$ ;),./,..1 1.. .--,. - ,,,, ...., / IL 1 ti -i ' klailj . l.i . ..,77, .1..," 41`01n.rt ildtt,. 10. fil.' :. ....'',," :"' '' " 4.`1/ 2::, I,i ilatil . -- -.`" ?"1"Itisr. . -. A I k daft' st,...., / ., t ,....,, ... .A 1;4' : ' ' pv -- .. ,.i,,.4470: „..:;:. ,,__.... : , t, , ,. , . co r ,, .,. ,,• ,,,,,...„,„,:••,,, ,,,,, ,::-ip. ., „„,..._,„,,,,, --•,i-, :1, — ,.,, ,,,: -• ,•• • 11''"( (''. te'..:':`., 11 ilf; I , •-t,',•-,,,' 1 ..'e ,,,fikl,',,if — -,---1.„,. ',::--(-- ...s„..40„„?, 4,, C ,-- i .,....14; k-...sk.... ,.., !. .,,./.,;,.. ....;„„t , ....„)z :1 . . . . kia` ': • . -.., 7 v, , .e.,-. , ' ':,`,' . ,.. .,.: CC' a. . ida...,fpliit, off ,:r.t," .---,..'.. ., ..,.., 1, li. .......,„...,41 ,t.. . : „- . ' CI ..:-.....%,..,..,j, ir ...,,,,. .i..,...,,, „0:,-,,,,,,,t,,..,ii . ...,.i,,......„,.., , , ,,,..,g. ,„„.,ii, or ...... . ..,, 4,4 I+ ." 4...-4......": :, :/ -*- !;_,, ..• 0,i, -ill '44 i - ' ---1 -' .0,$.....-- '-. t4.4, 0 , ..4 ico III , ,.. :, --,,..,,,..z , , , ),y ..; 8. --`,z '-a--"', 1;1'.',-, '....., 1 - imorZ'. .. 4,.t..14:-t.17±„..,„„ '95",..„Htigl,, ...„:. .,-..„,„,. ,.., 11‘8 4''''4....4‘"'.. ..,,,,:t,":,.. .,g,,,t-,,,,,,. " ifil 81160 . . . , . . • „ .. , ,,, ''.......,, ... ,. . . . , . . . . . r .) . . , . ..., „...... . .............,,,,,,,,„,,....,,, • ;A "., „ n.�.o�---r--- TRANSCRIPT FOR MAIN STREET • ".. FROM April 2, 1985 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING 38 , , , . . , R-12 on the up, , , Where not allowed by the code , . . , , , , , , , , . need to point out to you that the building setback requirement from R 4.5, We have five single family residences here, • multi—family, Philadelphia Square, the building setback requirement is 30 feet, „ „ what that set back is as shown, „ „ „ , „ . Secondly the requirement for landscape buffer in that -thirty feet is fifteen, We 0 „ „ „ , . . , . . . , „see before you, The setback hear is the same and the same for here, uh, , , , „ ,mu?ti--family uh I think its 10 feet here versus the 15, , , when its multi—family higher density, we , , . , : to that also here. No proulems with setbacks up here, , „ , , , , , i „ in concrete, the former access, connecting to the approved the access point for Main Street and Highway 99, those where put in with LID 87, I paid half of, and the City's paying half of the cost of that, to the benefit of all downtown, And obviously, the , , , , , , , , anchor south end of Main Street, The final point that I think that We presume, information on your mind is that this is not a blued dyed foot print, in front you, There is a real tenant in the audience. A tenant that has signed the contract, and the lease, the general contractor is in the audience, who is consigned on, loan has been approved, were ready to build, its up to the subjtct to the procedural steps we're going through here tonight. They want to have a building open in September or late August, We can do that, if with the cooperation ion and the analysis i str �ryt p. y the issues in front o� you, as you stye it. Finally, the City will receive and major benefit Prom the rezoning that r1 TRAN8CRIP1 FOP PCB i-05 & 2;C 5-65 Page 1 k �:. property. The major benefit is that currently the plans For Fanno Creek are : sitting in ownership of land here of land here without know , . . , . . Y . ; . , , , , , . . subject to development . . . . : . . . . . . . . This spot over here is owned by me, T The zone change , . . . , . ; . as a trade off for the zone change, consistent with land use maps, can use with under the Sensitive Lands Ordinance and the Sensitive Lands Permit, which only this Use, because it is both a legal deed convenant when we will be putting in as a condition of your approval, We ask you to conditions us to have that a legal deed requirement, that not only affects me as the property owner, but q any and all perpetual future uses, But the only use that this can be under {; the Sensitive Lands Permit to be reviewed and approved per our standards, is for the parking lot purpose, there cannot be a building built there, and we • will put it in the deed restrictions with your cooperations. So their can't be a building' there, I now need to introduce Grigsby Christopher the project architect, the principle of this project, Christopher's firm also, I needn't remind you, was uh on previous designs for the Civic Center in downtown, near the , , , , , , , , ; , 4 , 4 , , , , ,down in that area, From om t+he 4 4 1 1 4 , ; 4 but specifically, this firm was the architect for the project that you approved and gave me a site plan approval for, under the planned unit development , , ; (coughIng)44 General plan approval in April of 1982, The reason why is wasn't built was that economic, at that time in 02, high interest rates and a lack of the approval of the second L.X) did oot allow for the improvements to go in along with the economic realities, The tenant lease is signed, the loan is approved, they now have phase I of a 4 1/2 million dollar investment ready to • go, Thank you, "i"RAWC IPT FOR PO 1-85 & WW 5-85 Page 2. ' • .W..y. .... . ay. iYl '". 1WYS'wJLUY.d I. b1 .y... My name is Grisgby Christopher, with Brun, Moreland, Architects, , , , . , , x will give my presentation from this plan. It's just a little better uh overall site uh the vicinity map so you can see how the project is long a narrow and fits into the context of downtown, this is a private road through here, . , the Pacific Apartments uh, ; , , , , , , , ; , ; , , , , ; , , , the project uh, retail development, , , , , ; ; , , , , ; ;downtown, , . . : , ; . point out that this is phase I, : , , , ; , , , ; , , , , , , ; ; ,u; , this building and the parking area here, uh, this area, next area to be graded of and , , , , , , ; , here: tit The kind of development along here , : . . ; retail or or : ; : : : ; ; : . . : ; : . , . . , more detailed , , . . : city staff, NPO, and uh, uh, some oversites that we know about at this point in time. ; , : ; . ; : , : : : ; circulation, another thing there's o A 30 foot wide, curb to curb, uh, streets that were improved, uh, previously, uh, : ; , , : , : : , Street is, uh, as requested by the city to slow traffic down, we would like to add to our proposal, uh, : ; : , ; : : . : , , : 414 ; 1 . : : : : : : : : . : : . speed bumps: Exit bump here, this is an exit, this is an exit, : ; : , : : . : : : : : l : : barricade here, uh, until., uh, I guess the total development is actually done , : ; : : , ► ; : 1 . : ; ; the barricade; 'g, Sir, the requirement for the barricade is long beyond just the development of this property and I' 1.1 explain that. lr l Christopher, i ( C 4 4 okay, o ' f b, 'There were a number of conditions which this 100 and the Planning C,mmission have ; ; ; ; ; , ; , , ; ; ; , w Mr; Christupher, ; , , , : w this is a "larger building, about„ „ , , . . , these are • tRANSTRII T VOR PO 1-05 & ZC 5-05 page 8 ,' ,..r..A.,E... ., .,i, ..,... J . ,..., ., .. ..., ti I.. ,-,•:,. ':'.,;. _ ,. + na.eW wu. 3tY'k wlAYltl.MC1ihY,✓•'r9ki+G.^.i Aljvi' Frk7lJv:AJJa..m.v ( * i about 43, the 4 the elevations r' here, this is about 157 all through here, 157, this spot in here is 175, and thats about 20 feet higher than this Uh, Setbacks, uh, hero W( are required to have a 30 foot, uh this is a R 4 zone, we have forty feet setback, you require a 15 feet buffer, we have a 15 feet buffer right on right on the short strip between here and the asphalt, uh, . 1 , , , . . , / . , maintain, we would use, uh, , , , , ; , , , , , , , , , , forty feet of landscaping, , , , actually in this area several years ago and „ 411 nothing but marsh land along here, When we determined the setback, we comply, we did not comply until uh staff had done their report, we've made the changes in compliance with what they wanted, 4 , , , 44 , 1 , 44 basically there no more exits or entrances off this side of the here, here, here, here, this is a loading area, so the only y l agh t that could possibly affect any 1x1111 , could lie in this area here, that is 44x4 , , , , cutoff from the light fixtures themselves so therrls no light shining in the, uh, adjacent lands owners4 These apartments are higher, 4444 , , , , 1 , , about a half of a football field, , 4 4 , 4 4 4 1 4 , 4 4 4 1 , 4 6 6 1 4 , We will provide a site obscuring fence, uh, per city code, along the property line, uh, 444 , 4441 we 4 4 4 4 , 4 4 4 4 , 4 1 4 , 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 x 4 6 1 4 4 4 1 1 , .A. would like to address the 4 concerns that the 100 had about noise. Uh, the, the air conditioning unit thats up on top of this building is centured in the middle of the building, uh, this is the one that we are going for, better idea than this one, and it going to be, you don't have , 414 , 41441144 , 114 we' ll address those in the detailed plan review, But initially we Pelt that this line we're going to have units back, i-r:ont and back, one for the drop area and one for load 4 4 4 4 4 •6 area,y y{}�.�w±�{.y �y • area, 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 1 4 4 1 4 the distance s Nance here, again is, this is a Boo yard, 1 1 , 4 , here, 300 yards here, about 15 feet '1'tAfilSCRi:f T Ito PCB 1— ZO 5-05 Page 4 • i,,:.• t i::J.r.-.. . r..a.:Q7- M1J w. ...dw'N A' an • less than, excuse me 100 yards, or a football field here theres about 15 feet left in that its uh . . . . . , , feet higher . . . , . , ; , , , , so I don't think there will be a noise problem at all, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . trash compactor, or , , , , , , , , , , , , , is located inside the Loading from trucks theres no loading after 12 noon. Hope thats, uh, end of my presentation, JB, the issue of sensitive lands that issue will be in front of the sensitive lands hearing at the end of this month', that is not an issue in front of you this evening, , , this sensitive lands , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , is grandfathered, by the existing code and . 44 . . . 44 , allows for the development of the 16 acres before I purchased the additional property, tt is important to me though, obviously, to ask for your approval of the sensitive lands permit » , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 4444 The other major point, that is related, that the issue of the — . 4 , — , traffic • and the barrier needs to be spelled out and maybe, probley you recall, • special concern to NPO # 1 had, if not I would refer you to page 71 • of the development code, and it further spells out in about five paragraphs what City Council ordained, and had approved as the area of special' concern for NPO 1 and that is that that buffer will not be removed until offsite 1 improvements, well beyond my control and totally in the City' s 'control and d other private property owners jointly make development efforts, and the City make certain capitol improvement efforts, and there are those short range plans, two or three years, to open up that barrricade, When it is open up, both the use of that property, street, the improvement of Ash ']: Net and its access by both the residential neighborhood and the existing Philadelphia uare Apartment , its. use will be as of stat�f characterizes it is as a i� y r � ThAN8Ci xPT FOR Pt 1-0!5 & ZC 5-86 gaga 5 . .-, .-..,.....qn.... v ,.. _...-....... .. •. .. .3v .,.._.... ,. ,...�., f,` u11(U.7'.A.AYt'AI: wt.e..UA4'll i+.l nL r } 4.. convenient route to main street. First having to .go up there to Frewing, and also as an additional commute for the lower half of Ash to Highway 99, through ' private property . , h , , , , 1 „ , . . . , , , , , , , per negotiations and approval of the PD and all the documentations that we have, Finally, Mr, Moen, as previously , , , , . , , . . , in May 1983 when I came up for the first review of my planned unit development and the extension, you asked the question, from the minutes, if the plan were still to stand the same x say roads and the orientation of the buildings, it was factual then its obviously factual now, Other than a minor change of the roads, and orientation of the buildings • and the addition of some land you see substantially less parking than what was • approved before, you approved 1,220 parking spotsythere 1,137, you approved 175 approximately square feet of retail on 16 acres, we now have 21:5 acres and their is less retail with 213, excuse me, 217,630 square feet of retail on here, and that is less percentage of buildi 4 ` going on this land 4 1/2 million, for that kind of an investment I'm required to meet my tenants demands and Amy own , , , , . , , , , retail community shopping center, end result, Costco typical of most ,• of their other buildings in the state of Washington, : headquarters, • retails buildings, not the existing buildings that many of you know of on the east side, : : i , warehouse, which was empty, in an industrial - cning and they have used for a year and a half, The building is , tilt up finish it has a one story height, well below the requirements that are allowed in the zone, which is 40 feet, We're 28 •feet high, + , , i i . 26, and that exterior is exactly the kind of exterior that you would of see on a GI Joes if it was there, its what you would call a raked finish, painted, it will be the kind of oyster col.dr like to see on the wall behind you, right now, not a Shuck's {9r yellow, And it is a large building and well be blending in with a solid i rest th retail : , : , on that landscaping plan , + , , , i design there, The est of the , second major anchor part, phase II there, will be a combination of brick, concrete tile and glass, i i i Y , i : : t i i i i , i , 1 i i i 1 , : 1 „ 1 1 Very similar, but not quite the look iii Yi Yiiiii1Yii Y ( iiiiYYiiYiiii Finally the two front pads ` that, there will not be any drive in restaurants, going fast food, because number one I'm not allowed per my site plan for my permit with the state to have a drive through, such as a fast food would have, and specifically the lower desiljn down by Mr, Patterson's Century 21, the bottom left there, g g 1 1 , : iii 1 i be a large service restaurant lounge similar to what we know as a Stuart Andersons or along that type, but it will. not be Stuart Andersons per say, theses negotiations with iiiliili the other building will be a retail service building 1ii1i , 13m there, And it will Fit very nicely in with the other miscellaneous retails ii downtown, combination of service and retail, would like to now introduce the civil engineer for a eew comments, rah, Cave Larson, Lave Yiii11 i1411 , ii : i41Y1 ( 4Y 4iYii1ii 1 i , Yi , ii444ii TIONSCROT rote PO 1-05 & 10. 5-85 Page 7 4 y: My Name is Dave Larson, I'm a Civi]. Engineer with 4 , ; , ; , , , , , , ; , , , , ; , , , for � . that past four years, We don't have anything formally prepared tonight, uh, we are uh, , i ; ; , i , ; ; , , , . . , , , i if you might have any questions, (question and answer inaudible) , . r i . 35, The previous approval that you gave us on this 100 year floodplain allowed for a building of 9,000 square feet here, Chats the approved building right here and we also had the revisions, which was you indication that you asked me on that next , 1444 ; i414 , 4 ,Mr4 Moen. We had a second refill built in about 35,000 square feet, the size we now have up her which was a retailer like the Emporium, or like I mentions Rothes, we have roughly about 10,000 square feet of that .building in here, which was approved as part of our • existing sensitive lands permit; i644446444144444444414441444414444MOVed the 41 • road from hero to here, We had 44'4444i11444414441 no building on this, we had about LB acres in the 100 year floodplain, The maximum amount of .� . . y p additional floodplain, which is roughly 5 acres, according to staff 1 , , 4 4 , a 4 little over 3 acres of property here, within the 100 year floodplain, of simply asking for a one change to Cats to use as a parking lot, (di,scUssion i iaudiblel ) J8 4 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 Uh 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Costco manager of the Tigard store, 4.y /y(�. yy with(yy yy ir'X41!y �y{ manager !� he's been wcf king with 4 4 1 4 4 4 1 1 1 Who i s the Portland manager TRA WCRIPT 1OR PO 1-05 ZO 5-0$ Page 0 • -- Kevin Langford, just a couple of brief comments and then t would be willing • S •r to answer any questions that you might : . 1 . 4 . 4 . . We intend to employ A approximately 160 employees of that 55 percent would be full time and 45 ` percent would be part time Our rate of pay, 14 . . 14 , $iii . . , to about $12.00 an hour, uh 4 Christmas season, your looking at adding an additional 40 to 60 employees X know that noise and trucks are certainly a concern, however,' all of our receiving is done between the hours of 7 in the morning and one PM in the afternoon, all by appointment only. . 44 , 4 . 44 . 444 4 4 i . . . i i • . i 4 1 4 . 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 i 4 1 1 . i . 4 . . . i . 4 4 . 4 . 4 4 4 1 4 i discussion inaudible • 0 Moen, With that the next potion we go to the NPO, is there anyone from the NPO present, Carolyn j.�}�� }y j��j t1 �}+ dry NPO like � .. Carolyn Eadon, �i epresenting NPO 1/ 1, ii4iiiiii , ilili444414 '11i44 I would i to give you our vote 4144441441444144114444 4444444 / 44 We divided these• into two issue, one being the tone change and the other being the conceptual approval, On the zone change, 4 1 1 4 i i 1 4 4 4 1 i i i the NPO voted 4 to 0 against allowing the zone change 4444i4iiii44i441iii444ii144iiiii444441144 144 On the • 1 conceptual approval, two where in favor or conceptual approval and two where against, again 4 i i i 4 1 i i 1 1 4 i 4 4 1 4 1 4 . 4 4 i 4 1 1 i They would like to require a one condition to that, That i i 1 1 4 4 4 i i 4 1 4 1 1 the 6 foot fence 1 4 4 4 4 * 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 that that 6 foot fence be ih place before construction begins, The members who v�{�y��}�, against l;.y�•� /j��i.�j+i +��. approval,�1 !y ii��'y{ alto some of the i:�µ olied against 44 onceptual apps oval, and alto some of {Jhe 4 4 4 4 1 4 1 1 4 1 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 0410 being the Ash street connection to Pacific Highway, It felt by the i1y jyy jy •�j `.�y �y�j� yy y, that�+ I1 road j� �y e;�y that 1�441tiwd iate Iieighbo1 s tha4i the i oad 4 i 4 i i 4 proposed 4 1 4 4 i i 4 4 i i 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 1 4 that ems . TRANSCRIPT roR Po 1-06 & Z( 5-05 Page 0 ,.�,,.. ..,,. .... ,.,1111... ,�...,...,,,.., ., •.,.,- 111,1,..,- .. ... .. ..., .. .. ..,., ., ,,.., .... 1111 ...A..i e�w+ r.rx,'..,..ux xa�G.vii..�.Tutu.a.. ... 1111. H when that street: is opened up that it will be as a pass hhrough area for residence from neighborhoods above what is the immediate area, Part of the removal of that barrier , , , , , , , based on the future development of Hill Street, uh, and that is not necessarily in the , , , , : , , , , . i . , has looked at that area, and we were told by someone who had been in contact with Century 21, within the next two years they are hoping to complete that development which would open up, uh, Ash Street; which would thenfore allow the removal of that barrier, so then Ash Street would then , , , , . , , Main Street and Pacific Highway 1 i . . / i . , . Y 1 i 1 1 : i i , i i / , i , i i . , i . . 1 i , i , i 1 i . 1 end of tape i 1 1 . / i D .Q study has been done on the impact that that may cause in that small area, or DEQ study to be required. Also, . . . . . . . ; 1 „ Y dedicated street, we would like to see, since that is being built with a idea of being dedicated to the city, we would like to remind everyone that we would like to see that developed to City requirements requiring sidewalks and bikepaths through that r' area. Thank you, Moen, We iliililiiiiiii those in favor and those• against i i 444 (coughing)Y , Y si` a 7i �i+ Uh, with that in i i 1 1 i 1 1 six signed nl:.d up against,Y i Y i i i � Y i Y Y i Y i i i i i i i i i 1 i i mind r think that the most useful thing, at this point, would be to poll (P members of .the Commission, to see if you have any questions, or anything, first of all r feel Were going to have to put this over m „ . . „ . , I think it would be beneficial For the developer to have some input, at this point, any questions you might have, anything which he ory staff iil , ilYiYi / iiY1 with that I like I might ask the Commissioners, Commissioner Leverett �i •, '. Lt vero t t, r havo no questions, TRANSCRIPT "OR P() t-05 & C 5-05 Page lb (f• �k'• r Campbell, . . . 4 I would hate to see this set over, I notice an awful lot of people i444 . 16 inaudible 1i . 4 . . i „ iii . . . ( • several people inaudible„ iii Commissioner Butler, t have some on the ORB Master Park Plan 44 . . / . . 444 . there was some requirements or Conditions, if the Sensitive Lands permit is still valid, does it cover, I understand there was grading in the pond and all , . 4 4 . 4 4 4 1 . 4 1 1 i i 1 4 4 4 4 4 1 . 1 . 1 . 4 1 . . . 4 4 4 i i grading plans for this and the bikepath ' 44 . ' 444 . 4 4 4 i i 4 Owens, I'm not going to be able to stay past midnight, I think you'll still r r have a quroum4 i4 . ii4 . iiiiil4i vI • • Bergmann) Questions relating to the parking lot, there was a eounterdiction between keith and Mi., trishop' s presentation as to what is zoned —7 and CBD about the parking in the flood plain, that needs to' be settled, if we set it (, to another date certain, Peterson, I have, no questions other than that question he asked, Moen, ii 'lliiil . 4444 . 1 . Consensus about carrying this thing on, ii441Yi4i I' ll make a motion to set this over to the next meeting of the planning r Commission, y' 1 Bergmann, That' ll be the 16th, TPAi1l.►l:,RIPT ItoP PO 1-05 6 40 5-05 Page it 1 �� . . . ^ \ . ---- ---- - --- - ------ - --- -- - --' -- - —' -- ~-~ ^- --^ — —- ^ ----�- ~ ` /- ` . Moen, The 16th of April. I' ll go ahead and make that a motion, looking for a second and well vote one it, Owens, I' ll second, • Moen, All those, further discussion, I guess, \, �. v ` . Bergmann, Does it have to been the next meeting, Why can't we set it over • for a special a date certain, spend a hour and a half or two max. .� / . * Moen, We can set it over to any mutual date that we have ..^ ] Monahan, As long as its to a date certain, thereu no notification problem. ' . ' ' x Moen, What does the next meeting look like, � . ^ � . Monahan, Well you have a copy of the Agenda before you and it looks like a ` ^ . ` full night, -" . .� . ./ • people talking ^ . . ^ . 1Mmu6ib1m. . . , . . • • ' ! Moen, hats the possibility of carrying it over to a ^ . . ^ ^ . ^ ^ . ^ . . uh, whats you feol`\ny on m timta ` Monahan, Well, Keith's going to ho preparihg the staff reports for the 16th. .` ./ Would you prefer to, all together, or . , , . . ` .'� TRAN0CNIPT FOR PD 1-85 & XC.4, 5~85 pap. 12 `` . `---_' -~ • {k• v t( Liden, We have as many items, T don't believe they are going to be quite as controversial or take as long, Usually 1 don't get a good idea which ones 1 .• • 1 will be controversial until the notice goes out, and I start getting phone calls, a would like to make the motion that we set it over . , , , you • Moen, Okay, z y ; saying that lets just take a vote on whether we want to set it over t.J begin with We' ll decide on the date later. All of those in favor of the motion of setting it over to a date certain, say Aye, Moen, Owens, and Bergmann, ayes, MOEN, "Nays", Leverett, Campbell, Vanderwood, Fyre, and Butler, Nay; Moen, Okay, with that in mind, , , , , , , , okay, carry on then. Alright, with that in mind, , , , , , , , , , , , , , several people talking , , , , , , w Liden, Question on the parking lot, Uh, Mr, Bishop is correct that in a residential zones you are not permitted to Make modifications in the flood plain for additional development, grading and so forth, I have not seen a drawing depicting whore the floodplain actually is, z know that portion of that property that include the parking lot is within the floodplain, how much, t'm not really sure, So, if most of thats ire the flood plain then there would be a definite conflict there and well be able to get; a Sensitive Lands �,y �}.1/y {111, appp oval , , , , , , , 4 4 , , , , , 4 4 1 Uergmani , Can we restrict the use of that if the Zone is changed to 010, so that you would know that there would never be a building built on it, ` RANMCBEP`i" Op ply 1-05 & Z`11, 5-85 page 18 ......—,., .. ... _, .. .•.... ..5 -..., e•.. .,.. ........... ... i ., ..... •. i .. x r. .., .w.... Yu....w..T...v) .m,,.N.L.0 ApoWk Liden, No really, don't really have . , . , . , Monahan, I think you could place a deed restriction. • Bergmann, Deed restriction, Monahan, But, I think thats ,going beyond the issue, the first issue is, is the zone change justified based upon the standards in the code. Thats what our staff analysis was based on. Not on a matter, well, Uh, In terms of using this for a parking lot, should it or shouldn't it. The parking lot is a secondary issue, tt..0 first issue is should it be changed to the commercial, But I think if you did find that it could be changed to commercial, you should require a deed restriction, Bergmann, So what your saying is Chats its already in the downtown area and its R- 12 and you caii't build anything on it because its in the floodplain, Monahan, That is to be determined once the information on the sensitive lands is provided, flood question, We have representative map that shows where we think thn floodplain line is, Borgmann, And it appears that most of it is in the floodplain, Monahan, Out its up to the individual property owner to then show, what the } actual location is, also, dust because a piece oP land is designated as residential or commercial, if it has these, uh, environmental restraints, uh, '1`Rr1N8mor roo PO 1-05 & ZC 5-05 Page 14 ---.444111 . , . . 2 p, , . , . . . , , , . .,. • ,. .. ., ,. . . . . .. ,.. ,.,.. , •• . .. , . . ( , ( L.,' . s.,.._,.. "\. I• ,4 • ,.. iliallealEMIIIIMRISIWIIMMMIMM°91111.01221MOMMMNINIMMEMIMMEIMfiatar . . ,. • :-•, . ',.• ' , !.4.4,„' I '''' -' 1/4,°" 1 '' 7/ • \., •.____ , „___.... , . t, ----7- • , .4 it '' t,1t:7-;: Q--,. ,,, 1,:, , .g va ________,...„.„......... „..,.., ,,, , /„. ,. .0 14; \ ,., ri__,,,, i„-, 1[ - LI ' '....' ,''' / ,., ' ' \$ .. '.i.,,-•••\ '''' • . ' IC^ „\ ,, •‘,.. , I . /-• ,'AP/ ,,,.# '0 * 1 \ In, 1 t.ti- ,,,,.c .4,-,...i...- ' ,••• ••• / // ''',. ,','' ^ ='. •i I I .__ .. 0....... ..:d41._.1 - 1( 1 ,--------- :3.'- 7 /' ,i•-'''' \ . '1. -\ ■ k ip. • 4 ' /.......f 4-4,..„.......11,: ''r ..„ .2:::....,, 4'''""•' "'..' --.1': ‘'' '.."...B.rn-rn, .4;* ....s. ' ,,.......,..../." , ......,17. •...4 -fg ..4,7•... -,,,... _....' , _ . 4.. .<7,,../.! •■ - • \ / , , . /50 \ #A .4. . ‘,47 '/111141} • ----. ' S 1. :IA \ .•-• 7' ---<>.,.i . , ,... . . .) ••• ,,,' ..,.. 1 - I I, ,,i P,,,•'''' , i 1r \ X 1 ) *<\ 0 \.. .''- ...÷,1* oi,.„, , .1 ...2 . ,.,•+. . - 0 /0.4.. 01 .... ii / C-----1____ •,11 4.. ie, ' - LJ '‘, ‘‘ ii• 1, ,..,..; ) /// -1 ,'' ' 1 • , •\ 1 . 1 ,, ,,,,..<f,•,... ‘,,' . , .,,,„,w, .6 --1 1 • ,s . ., \,.. L'i I . - ., .., ,...id Mc, _ . 4 OW • 4.-R! . 1 , • ',_.,.., . ,, // N... ,, ,,,,, k • • r 4 F' i'T. • SEATING k ' , 1 ,..ei.iiiiitsmis, ,,,..., ,, 4,..i../ ------ ,.,. E '0; .... S AT NGAREA ,..0- .,. ..,, ,', .'.‘ ..,'•),,° .., ,‘ aill' ' / '' ''. , . .'e : . I• Vf g EN Eli ZA - -, .1A, .. ••,...,,,:••••••• ...:•:' • 1 . i . •, • , 4 ii• Ilai : i. . ••,• • i• • D ... i s, ,,., ,, , • ,, Dow ,0 4 -PC-AZA• _,.-"' •',#01,.01 7 a• " •• '...“.4. ..-, Sig ,e.,aegr., :.,,,,,,OV7_,. *NI 1 .... 1W11 /7\ ,,,,,,, , ''' ',...,..- II:‘‘.. ‘ ■. - MEADOW . i . ' . ,.. .:•-..... . . r 1..!OPE Ft.4.S ARE--,A:,..-:•'-:--;'-'' il,Ii‘Pff,......*::: : "I . I:' --..-L.:4'.- ,- F' 'Ws.-1.`r."11-"-"Wr I 1 A ' ,' \ ... 1 \\ /7 •4, ...,., i. 7 e,,,... _.- t •4.•• . kfr- :\ ATURAL AREA /,'":7 ''ON II' / A / ‘N. • . 1,:./'- /17/16.v.'*-410-1/Ifis,ft,, •••••""--' !•;-•,;1.;•,: ---•'.••:f: ' !•. .....1 1 1111\. it i • 76,.7, ■ , - ,;,,r_,..44%41-077.3,;,,,;;;Ilit e . '. ...'..... -:•., "I , Air.di,„ 4,.,;:A..4 4 Al dl,\ / 4 ... '..i,--; -'44..144.p •;••:••••••..- • -.... .•:,.••:.:• ).„4„ w.„.......,,,,,,....„, . -, --.,-7-= .,.. . t„,•.,. ,----4--,.--- ‘4\,,..,.:..,,.....••• • • ., .•;.•:....: .,.,,,,,„,„ , , _ ..,,. \,. .. .. ,. . In . r,IgPxy■ i CITY .-- II ii./ * .••• .• ,,,.. ,-,..-.::z.,-'i.V..‹-•--'z•:-.:. ;':419,-»•:' ,, --r---• • ' ■ *,, 0•jiliiiihr•-■..4,,,,, ,,.x..,,:w:,...:(,, . , . . .".. -■ 'II' on* 1:0; • , I 4.0o , \\,\.4, ::::::-ie„..-7-•;f-li:••>--E,,,~V „.. .4 '.1,,I+.;..,_:,-,;,1."....`■;•,••-' .., ''. 111 1 - ', . .. . o i ' 0 .f...-"Z:::,;,,e-.,"-:::--:--:::':4-.::::.;-',;•-•-.,':: . o- ••• . •i ,, ......% .i, "II ‘.,..,.... N.,•-•:,N. • .//- . ....,•••1 0 inAll, 1,'l 1(1.1''r.' .Alkilskai) ila .,, ,i/,...... . - ,( 1111111111.%,-,..... ...-: ..... . .• . ,...„..; ,, ./. ,..., , -,.- , -.:„.....:....„.„....,:-....„,„..,/,,.. 4.:,.,....„<„,„....„....„..„, .... . ,,,,, ....,..,.. . • , , -,..„,„,,,,,, .. .„,..... . ., • . ....:......... ,•, ,. .,,,„,... ,,I irmelm, ,• I .. .... ; •, i,,,,, - . . , ''' ,‘. ,' ' linithiry ' I: I:* i . . - ..F...-,::,:-:--.....:...---...-:::- i , , / / ' ., 4 7• 1 ij i / giBBLL110.. ,..".....\ .';'. '-''''1.• • •I ..• '' 'Alp dill 0. wig._ 0. 414 •owl ,,,,, • r f II- . . ,•••.1. - - ' ., ------•::-- t,.- 111 % - i 1 6/ q ,•I. ( \., .V.„,,\‘. ,,„•,...„ /..._..,...,, I .•;:,• N 1 .17-,r cc / -,....,...._,---,..-___ , .1,1111111 '. . ..,-.'4,;,!..,•••••..:••;•:_•..,40k■ j-- Wiry's.,",..., din .:. i . , •:yARD. , - 4. 4 •','•'....! '.1--4,... \\, 111"1:' ' '''''',... ,, , ,_., c7.,..,1 .'. ..'N ' ..'`'.A-•-:........;'LLEIIN -.1r.''' - mc,„...1111,1..!An 11 , "• '" .,1 -"'""' - 7'''''% ''''- ' ' \-' -.14--' ''.7 .li e _. • , • I .,,,/co i----,,-. :; ,,•-: ..,- -:-•-..:-::........c<1 itiltr..tgli'. ..7'.-tr-IIS . , ,.-.. --- --;•-_rr...--... 1‘.. • ,...:6, . Aft' ---• 1 i -° ' - .. 1 I. ., • . --., ,. . .• , ....../ ,....., ..„1... ., ., •. 4,, ...,t, .,.... .......-..,-,m,• „;;;;;\ . -- ,,,,,,2 ..,..„• ..11& ',Fr .. 1-•I '. " ' '•‘....,,,,. `,,e,.,-,.. ,'. 3 ,• - ::. ",' ,„•_)..., ,,.,.., ,,:..., , ..,.,,...„.,,,, _ 1,4i4. 31:::: . dira ..,. :,,, . , ,_ , ,, ,, , :-.-...--,,,' ,..,.... , ..., yr is ,.••:„, ,,.., •.-•; ":: --•,.... W . .::'•Wi'...:.:'..r,IISM1116\ 1/41,1 .-, .... . •.e"°, 1 -:.,, ., • -, . . _____..---- . , . ,•.q, - - ' -. --. . \N A ---' 0). d,-. + - .A. ‘ •, , --.-. ,IF ' --, --*-......, .•,...,:,;•!,.;•.:•,,, ,..r.,/,‘„,,."...7-.. -..,,,,%,.,•,..a z...... ,, .... , ii..'11,7•••••%•\11.\: ..", "1..1 , '',. .414` 1 " --'--- ,00:100 , . <tfr-a-•.-.4irr Ittitlie`::',' . .''' ) , . . : I mil * dit :•,:?,•,1...........;,:!....t" . .* 0111*04,'.•:' . • •••••••••7 _11111!7,2'.i :. 1'"... '....:::'‘. .. :'. Ir-_ r -.4 i y \<,\„,,, ,-,... ......149,p .„-----740;ok . Ai, /Of P''' 112''•• -../ , il / '• '/' /' 1 i ' , 49:,.kw. f „ 6_ ...__...::: / _- \ '..s.'...: .-..-------:-.:.-•...7:.:'.::":1'',.....!....:::::\ -',....--_,-..:„--..'-.....:...':-... 's: -1/4".'...'). ;,"'':4:'..': ^- ...1F ■ :::' .__.A104110011; :e-i: i IL:4"L".1;Wslir''''' 11751)". IVE/CENTER' , //)". ' 4'1 •\ ,...,,-....,2..1,.,::._--•,:',. `., ' ., '.,,, .••,,, i.1:I.:Y.',Il ',:. .,.•,,,.=,. ,,.„4.t,....,:-_-L„..,..*,,F,;••4111;;,$.46. / .._.._._,,_ --.5....,:' ::: ,,\b 117 -41111411-W-.14 r 7 .• - -- ,r. ,,. , • .. , ..--7-'• /. ..----• ,,4,' ,..; •.,,.....,..\-;:: ,......:H:: • • , he... .....it 7 1/4;.„` \,............T.:7-.7;-1-A..; •••"...'''''.....••••• 61•14•*•'''-.4:.-*..-'• :•,-,.`.,,•..- ,:-.,Id'."---t Jo ' .."' .111 - ----- -:-..."--:.••- " ' "*\ c:::,,, wa.,,, •\---, \--- , / ,, ---\, , 1 \;:-..„ ,...... .,....., . •.,. ■;..... ...... „cll. q .....,:_-_,.,.... :.,,,. .....,. .. ,,,,...„....: ,,.,.... ,. ifietiot.”...w • .7 lip.,,, „. _,:,....)::::;..,..-2:2;7.:::,;:::._::.:::::::,,;..i; :, -, \ ./,),f • ,73) .5„,, , . ......, , \, , „........ .i. ,/ ,/,_••-•, , , „. ....... .„ ... ....., ....ail...". ••..v . ..„ „.: •:...:...... . .„. ■ 41 ' 0.7 •,'-'----" `,, ""*.::".., ' ,, . LAIR 1111■L........■-2•,..,. ..--.., ...,„.....,...• st....,/,i,..:,..,.......-:„-_--.r.;.,..."...).......,. ' .. ‘,..,0,-,744 . : :.,./. ; .....,:, like ... ''. • :,, i // 1: ' ,)"' .. ,•',i..,, .. .•'.10L,',...., ,,, ..ki... .'/- :,"'..;,.."1,itt":';':•:i':•:'.4. .,, ‘ ,.-.,,,o ..-•. .,ii .. _... ,,„..,,-: 1" _.. , .:__ , vi.' /.\,.• e---s---\ ,,, • \ '\ I ,, '•' ., ' . II .., ' .... / ,•i I 4 \-,----} t '..''''':•• -. 1111 '`•‘ ' ''.:.:*-7-7.:.----f••=4:1.‘f 4, ., .,.. ,. -....----- - , ‘,, , . i , \\\ j • i.C2;;;NhOuSt:- 1 , , ' I I I I,', , , • .' N'.'''‘. •.., * Naik.-::::::":1.',::::2:''...•':• LL'i ..,... ''' ,*.,'' '''. .s.,‘ , .7••••••:::,s:'.'.1.,•:„FS:t.',, .- ' -•-•'7.-''' ---1.) ' ...-/ I ,.. -..-.....•• SP, . 1 ' / - o 1 ,• : ; \ ^•Z I . 4‘' NI!O• c SEMI()',' ,T ,/ I . - 'N. 6 ' / I `.•• , '•/ .I••-.••-- . 1 5.:4;,••••■:.•:,••. 4.`-) ',,-7-:*??1,,..... , '-• ''''., '"'-"^:-.=-.. • ... • t .,, - i .-•• . 1, , •-• ,,,>q ! ,I1 - .,...--•••: ..,•• -,,,..-''--:...,• •.:•.•, -'4, -^...."..-7, : P • x -........„ ; ....... 7,...42,:., ../,.....,...:/.. ., 4.:::,..: . . . ,. ...................„ 1,,_;. 1",:,05,.. i, ..,, ,...„ • ...„, ... ‘ ,9. ....,,...,....2,i::::::„.„...,..,. ...„.:21. :.....:,. .--...-:,-- .,et1 A •-:;'-....--„,-.-.■•: !‘ '----. ; • ' •,..,,,k ., , 1.' ,..' ' t, . . I - ', ,., -,,.....,,,-....,..„1„...,.a.,, if.c......,_a•rt, ,•:, .;;;;,-.., _ k hp, -,,,,,.....j., 71,,•:',-,:ir./i: ,. 4e. .\ . ......!,,,,,,t * ... - . ...-,....',....:,-...:....-,.....:-.4--?:-,7.,..,.7 •''',..:,'.:-::.:..,":,■,,) -.;:',.:,4', '.. _-... • \,1,:y ... ' y , ",' .„ .... ; ,.: ,;:ft F. .-Alf,:.•ii..-:2-fk ., .!r1141(2.5.,' 1; ..."."....'.i.,-, ,.,+45/. .', / „;0'.'.. ,'...., t ''` ''' 6 "'e7......-'- .4.1- .':,..:.1.:,,, 7 ..,..,-%!..:::'.1 Pet‘v..,:Y.:..>v. . ; , .- . . / , , //,\\•:.....' 44114;41B.'-fir,. aiir''' . ' -... ,'. '' '10! Al ....,." .1. .,Kop • -,,,,,,.. ,i, i •, (--3 •• -••-.--•.,..' / , . 1 h,i \ RK ,,, _ r , •\ ..--•--, - it,..7., ...,(? -.--,4•::. ; "...;•/. " ..- / , . , .. :t,,. 0 , . - e'. 4*.M. . ' : ‘44F , . .. - i I'm ii . , .. It SE..A7.1'1.-1■',.' * .1* s/e ., ; I _ ‘ -- ............... ,.. . • * . . .. , lif rN\,.. • .1-1-f-r- 111 I - -i.'''" e.e.es/.... -' ' ■ : . /. ./. ...K4,:,. ' -, ' Itibil 4 Pis'..' \ ' . .‘ ,r /,• K-___ (Z '‘ ..., e .,... ..E.1, fil ,2 ,,,,-4:::„..2 . •-,.... ,4-4,...1,--;,. . :.:. ' . , \ ' •' 1.- ..P,' '''11%11. . •• 4/i .. ••• •..,,,, ,,„ ,......... . 0. 14.I, ' f41-\ s 0'' ...._,.. , _, .74,,,. ,.4.:.11..'''.......•!....,1,..1,,..„.211 ) •• '•'':f 103' .. ....,.....)...........,,i, ." i.--. ••••..,:,, ii ‘,.N. 7 „ . , ' . ..,,,„•••••• 4 /..! %. \ \\ • • / 1 q• 1- IN\ , •-•I I-1 • 7,. - I . ::,.. , • , ...... . , , .. .,. .. ... . ..„,,,,,,, ,, .,, ...• ,., .. .......... 1/4..... „,.., ..., , ,;,,..• , b, , ,-, , ... . , , ., ., . HILL STREET1',, -------"--- . . , ..• . • • , ii" 1,1 ,-• •,..,. -,i /,..„ ....4 . 0‘.'''•,t.t* ' I, I ..,..•'e \\ ■ \, z>/ • I 'i i'''' : ' ,\\ \ e • J I- ,,, \ • I 7 il', \ _IC , , .... . . • , '„„,, 0° \ ■ • , , Vir, •-''•-:\,,--,,-)-t ) 1"-- , ■-r L.,....f I '. -"' : 'l •is).,,,,„. , ... --„: ..-.../. ■ ....--1,i. / i g • 0. .. _.., ' / -.---\-." , , • , .1"116surallawnla‘mussaini '..' 0 50 100 200 300 FANNO CREEK STUDY , , 'PARK MASTER PLAN • ---------------..........,............„...„,,„......,,.........„,. .JVIIIKlin CI)3Eitalat MA*23,1900 .' ,40..... Nammugams! Ceallit,01.42,21r3IMPLAL.M.XCI62W itillarEBNINIESEINIXI •' . -- •• P D 1,'''"ta 5 14'5 1.',.,)F: 1, , ■ ,„,,, ' .•••• .,,,, , ,--,•• .11E. ,,,,,,..._,,,,,,i: At,,, ,,..,,:L .......,....,==..,.„1.....,,,.„....,,,2,-_,,it.-4---,.„ 10,•-■----;,..--------,--7,--7--,,r••,,.''•-•.&..°,•,-.,t,rr,,,...t-ttitrtl,,,i---:r--:rz,:..-,,,,t,-.•7---v-.'••.,r,..•= r-,---u,--tz*ttr°4:"■-ii.' tti444p,rzi,tf",,,...,=,-zr.'.=t= ,..... ‘... " ' ',..,r,-...147.t.!7,- -rt--1...,.`"',......,., ,+ntvFgy.vy..,rvn,,a2r=,,,t..z,,t,t,-,,r,i,,,„,.,r,Nr.Arr-t, ,, .,,,-4._;.,,,,,tr...,,...., -t- "rvz,,trAtzsgasmisa ,,,igggstitt,t27-;••-"4---t",*:"7-"4-.'-'1r---"'"'"":3-'-„,„,„'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''------- ,__-___ ... _ ..,..__ ,..-_,..f.. .. --- . ------.---,--7.--.- :. 2.--,- :-.. .',.--.,.-t.^:'..;-.-,.---,-, - -... ......f--z-...“....,.1-,.t,:.___, .••,.■••_,-- _: '.,._.t,_:___-_...._.±.:•,:-.4-7.;...*_- --- - .-. -.. t,„ . :----z--,•--,L,..,1,--A,,,-..,.......-..-----,---4.-4,--, ,,t,r,------i1/44.ff-tic,,40,i1„,-_,,-K;,,,,;.4.,,,,,,,,,,,, .i,74.,--,;,,,,.7„,,-,1,-;: s,1,, ----z-r-,--,....r.„4i,..--,.:_l':‘,,-.,0_,-, --, -11,.--,t,r:,`'-''.`.. --a.,".-''''!`'-'`..-.,41,,,,,,4"..-1tei.:44teg"""'' ' "'-'"--''''''.''''....../''"*--..."" ,a,..v,...-,...,,,,,,-..-,,,,,,,,--..,,, ,,,--,-.. ...7''-`.."'', . ,r''''' :'.--, - :- --) - ....... , `‘.-r-'"" ' ''''''"---m""''''''''''''t"”''''''' ''''''''"""'"'''''''''''"'''"'"'''-'--'-------------,------m-- -- f ) I.. ' 1 * +'tlr"t"'"its" -' 1 . -"'lifillitt'lliiq910111illfriftlifirlili 11111i11141 I IP I ii ri 11 ti lir Il 11 I 1 I I 1 t 1 11 rpoititiri rolipitpoilliiiiiiiiiiiropiliwilalviliilittorfoiwilitilsiiiiTillo./ -.,..,;7.,4,,,T4PIN-•.',.,10., ........ •...,,,•.,,„;-. .- ..A. 'I' ' , ' t 1 ,...4 i...: .)I ..., I r 1 0 1 1 1 2 ..* f le I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 . . ....--___‘,.,,,,,,,, , . NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED -i. . , . ..;A.",,■Y ' ' ■ DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR 'THAN , . P 4-',,t. •, , . , ' . THIS NOTI.CEIr'IT IS.DUE,TO '' ' 1 ', . ,. • • THE.4UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL ,____„, . .., DRAWING. 0 IC 62 ez 2-.z 92 S2 t' CE E2 1E OE 6t ei LI 91 St f,1 CI . . __.... E 1 1 1 0 1 6 e c i ' 9 ..3 0 c a i oititare '(.;*1;f:r ...,,, .. . . ,,,,'" .....--` . . , ......-' . .V-, . • ,/ I t I I I I 1 I I ' I 1 1 "1 1 I 111111 1.1 I dati-1111.1.1J 100111 ttilliiallillillfillifilliii0111111010i011100111.1111.1111 1111.11it 1111.011 th1301,110.00.11j01.01111111111111001110100110111111111111114111111111111111010010111101111114111.10111111110111111111111111111111111111,41 1 i .111-111 I I I IIII It , c. , , , , ,.. , N,,,,,,, , Ate . . . . . ''' ''''" ' ',' ,,,,..y oo. .. • „ .4 i I 1 , i 4, f . ,. -. 1,,, , i III Nt, ) , j i '11) ' 11 .Th' ' . , • ' . ... . .... ,. : , , ,.....t (la • ,. , ,. - •• . - . • r, . , . , • . . . , . ' . . -. . [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] city obligation then to, find a solution to make the piece of land paveable, which is what we're basically talking about. • Bergmann, But at least if it was a parking lot, and it was paved , , . , the 100 year floodplain put water on it, it isn' t going to move anybody out that . , , ' just like park land: . Monahan, T don't think that a parking lot is just like parkway. I think that ip it can be engineered with an overall concept that the damage can be mitigated, from one section to another, But thats a sensitive lands issue, thats not really a zoning issue, Butler, What about my other question? , , , , , , , , , ; , , , , , how to satisfy the grading, hows it coordinated, Liden, Okay, as far as as the park plan is concerned, it was at least staff' s perception that those would be dealt with during sensitive lands review, for example, ih the condition of sensitive lands approval in the 100 year • :". floodplain, any bikepath or pedestrian path that is contemplated ih a plan would be installed as a part of the Sensitive Lands approval, Also, at that point , , , , , review the grading for anything inside the floodplain, so it is our thought that that would be addressed for the sensitive Lands Portion, Really most of the park issues, t would be taking at that time, NoW the, uh, the Park board did not voice an objection to the site plan, however, after . o taking a look at the ranno Creek study, master plan for the park, it does show some of the areas, at least conceptually, uh, back up, shows some areas conceptually in here that are indicated for park purposes on the site plan RAPJ cr xP1 tof PO 1-05 & ZC 5-05 Page 15 � . J-.._ '.. . - ��-�_ R4H..v ..t. .......1r:N .{ki 4W.J;.ae.. .1 w,Nral1'1,.✓ .. (.( �. develop, so, uh, there would have to be some review, and . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sensitive Lands to what areas are appropriate for Parks, There were also some letters that at least I will just note, I believe all these are in your packet, Secretary, They were handed out at the beginning of the meeting. Liden, We received a letter from Mr. and Mrs, McBeth, with a list of 7 concerns regarding the development. We have a letter from Mr. and Mrs, Saub, also voicing some some concern; You have a letter in your packet from Mr, & j'• ' • Mrs, Johnson with some concerns about the development, And we also have a letter from uh, Mr, Clark, who is the Chairman of the. Economic Development h • Committee for the City, and he indicates that there where four members of a A° their committee who reviewed the proposal and they choose not to take a • position on the zone change request and did support the project, otherwise as far as being a economic benefit to the City, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Okay thank you, • •Y Moen, Those in favor of going forth with the hearing, Mr. Caswell? "It not Mr, is Mrs, , , , , laughter, : , , , (several people talking) , + , , . I'm a'eanne Caswell, and I'm here for the Tigard Chamber of Commerce and I'm here to be very brief with you, I know its late, uh, We are in support of this conceptual project that ag Bishop has presented to us, primarily for three reasons. dumber 1 its been a goal identified by, identified by the Chamber and of the City Economics Development Commission that downtown Tigard, without the Urban renewal Program, it does need revitalization, anybody who approaches Tigard from the south and knows that it looks real ugly, its very ri TRANSCRIPT IOP PO 1-0 & C 5-05 Page 16 .,.e r...sir.e•...i.n.,,,,,i..,.n r....e.,.....r,...i«............,..,mr,.ranM.••Hrroal,...i..tw,q.rM..y.,n,rnr,.. • r p 1 I t. _, _. rr,y M: .e..'.lR:rl..,rwl uSl,Wer-.b!+V• t,..Y<.4..ut'.1, w. unattractive for business, its even more unattractive to people who choose to live here, uh, I'm sure you have heard of questions, as many times as I do every day, her is the heart of Tigard, there isn't ore. You know, it could be Washington Square, it could be down by the Post Office and the Health Habit, it could be out on McDonald, it could be Tigard High School. Theres not a heartland, and frankly that offends folks, it offends businesses, and it offends people who moue hear. I think this project provides a wonderful • .. anchor for the south end of Tigard. It gives us some depth , in the Community instead of what ie all kind of laughingly refer to as strip zoning along Pacific Highway, It provides a shopping Center for the Community, Uh, the next reason we are in support of it, is that Costco,i.n particular provides our • Tigard area consumers and option to high cost spending things that we all pick up at Washington Square, We can buy brand name products out of the Costco Store at not necessarily the same cost that we pick those thing up over at Washington Square, Th ,ts a wonderful option for our consumers and handy, The third reason that we support it, obviously is that is provides a plan for our a, community , T've been told that, that the predominate employee is a primary wage earner, We have a real problem in this community with unemployed woman • o. who are supporting households of children and they are not necessarily skilled, not necessarily skilled in the labor force. This provide an option for them for employment, along with many other kinds of folks, So that would be the third reason why we would support it, secondly, with regard to the zone change; uh, obviously its a very tough position for you to blend the business community and urban community together so that they •Fit together, We're supportive of the zone change, primarily for two reasons. Number one it provides a parking facility for park land, that hopefully will be used extensively in the Community. I think its far preferable to have a parking TRANSCI OT FOk Pp 1-05 & ZC 5-05 Page l.7 4 ._......... ..... „'., r.;.,.. ... „.,,.• t,.,r<,.., .,,,...,.....,. ,_ .`liy. ., .,. .,.• .., .... -_. ut, .. .f lr. C .. J.p t, tll',ylki.•f.t luAia;.: lot where folks can park their car than to have them abandoning their cars in the driveways and on the street of Ash Street, and frankly thats where they !! % will be. Jack Park and Mary Woodard Park currently face that problem and its a pain in the neck for the residences. I'm sure you've heard that from other folks before. Secondly, theres n advantage to the City, frankly the City does not have money to do a lot of developing, the developer has indicated, he would be willing to dedicate some park land that would help complete the Fanno Park Way. I think thats a real advantage in of our City officials to look at those gifts, even though we are in a crunch situation, I think we need to look at those things. Those are the primary reason for the support, as the Chamber support this planned unit" planned development, and uh, we recommend support and approval of that as well as the zone change, Any questions? P Thanks , ` Moen, Okay, we'll now.heaar those in opposition, Mrs, 'ohnson? . a A i The only thing I wish to discuss, I guess everybody is discussing it, is the zone change on the, the main reason why we are protesting is just because of, the NPO wanted, and all the residences within the immediate area O'mara, Hill and Ash Street, fought so hard to get that into, Well our situation, to protect the residential area and to protect the greenway, because we knew the 4 situation, and all this , , , 3 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , so thats the end of that, Well the traffic flow after studying the map, the long way, when I saw it at the NPO, I saw it in a different perspective, now I'm seeing it as a resident of that area, and the area that I do live in is about three blocks from where the large buildings going to be, thats not the point, its the street pattern that we are worried about, because I've been talking to some of my neighbors, uh, • i `RAN CkIP`f" roo PO 1-05 & ZC 5-05 Page la this type of and its connection with Pacific Highway is a terrifying aspect for them, because they feel that this flow of traffic is a tremendous a . , , 66 , a , , find a opening and zoom, in they come, Now, we have very low �� •.. • density area,, most of the lots are 7500 square feet and up, and its been that way for years and we wish to 4 . . 44 , . , 4 . , . , . . . I just, since theirs going to be a extension of Ash Avenue, eventually, its on the agenda, theres this street coming around and then theres a little one that goes off into Main Street and the it comes and •angles and goes to Pacific: Highway. That makes • tentatively three streets coming into Ash and going to be filtering to Burnham Street from this development, we' ll have traffic from Village Glen, Ash, Drive, and Frewing and then Garrett and the who NPQ residential area, Which is what that mostly is, all residential, Well thats is that. And uh, we understood from the new comprehensive plan, that they were suppose to do something to protect the establish areas, especially the low density single family areas and the concern of that street its the main thing, its, do they have to have this thing backyarded into the neighborhood, Thats what I'm .,, trying to .say, Is there anyway, i i i i , a , i , , , , , 1 i i , just that batik dooring business , , , i , . , , ,here that next problem that someone mentioned, Theres �its to be lot more cars and not, yiry j j� �.y y� going to be a lot more cal s i , 1 and what no4, i , i 1 , 4 4 i i shopping co 1te1 But, the air quality in that little dip, has it been studied, or whats going to happen , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and uh, unfortunately for Us, where we live, and is , , , , , 1 , 11 , , x , the noise factor comes from the west and north and we get the drone from Pacific Highway, 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 4 1 4 4 4 4 1 4 4 4 1 4 4 okay, 4 4 4 1 sunday event, 44464444444441 , ii noise factor, . 41444f44444 . 4 4144 after you stop and � yu' W� y�y }.� }� Iy1 �+ yy �`�y ��a}y �t }� �1 {: r(�+�j� think and listen to it, Hie proposal 1 s 4hCre, , i 1 i i , , i i , , 4 , , , i i , and lihats 77 i t. 6 4 , 4 1 , 1 , , , , 4 i 1 i 1 1 i 1 4 1 4 1 4 4 4 4 ` RAN8c Ot roR P() 1-05 & Z1; —05 Page i9 ((k • question of what would the volume of cars that would be generated by this Facility, and it was 11,504 cars per day. Well I've calculated that out on a eight hour basis and I calculated out with two access roads and then the three access roads, If we had two access, that would me that we would have to have 12 cars per minutes come in and go out And if its three your looking at 8 cars per minute, I don't think our roads can take that kind of volume out of • the access that are talker about right here, Oh, especially Main Street, I don't think that Main Street could handle it. A volume of that type, And I think that uh, those factors there, uh, I think that a lot of people do not drive Pacific Highway now if , , , , , , , Ash Street put through and it was proposed that only 2% of the traffic would come, through the neighborhood area, I think that is a misnomer because a lot of people will not drive Pacific Highway, They will find other routes to go, I know myself, I find • other routes, Its been about five months since I've driven on Pacific, I only drive on Pacific Highway now if I have to stop at a shop close to , , , , , place then I get back off of it again, So I think that we're looking at, looking at a lot greater amount coming through a neighborhood area and again the traffic speed is going to be such that, I don't think your going to be able to hold the traffic down to 25 miles per hour, We have had children injured on Ash Street before, I think we are just increasing the volume of traffic through the neighborhood and we're going to be looking at increased potential accidents with children , , , , , , there still going to be children, • so with those in mind and because of the controversial nature if the • Planning Commission does see Fit today to approve the tone change and approve the , , , ( ou h) , , , , if you could bring this back before the Planning ng Commission as far as the detailed plan study, it could come back again before you, , , 5 , , , , , , , , , , , 4 , , thank you, TRANSCRIPT CRIPT FOk Ph 1-05 & 5-£05 Page al .. .ti,,.-, ..,,....., ..... .. ... .. ... .n. .. a mow•,. .n..1w», eae en V w x i...lw n w-F.A.. rY Moen, Okay, Mrs, Johnson, Oh, I forgot to give my address its 9300 SW Hill Street. Moen, E. Whitker? I'm Emmet Whitaker, 13250 SW Burnham Court, uh, I would like to start out by addressing a couple of things that the woman from the Chamber of Commerce addressed. I think one, that as far as providing shopping area for all of Tigard residence, I think that thats a misnomer because of the fact that Costco has a limited membership and so it will not provide shopping facilities for everybody, per say, And the other one is that it will provide jobs for uh, single family with children, and if you look at the average of the Costco • employee on their existing site on the NE side, you will find that most of them are college age or a little bit younger, so I think again that there may be, their higher practices, are such that uh, they won't provide jobs either, Then I would like to get into some of the other items that I would like to talk about here, One is that I am concerned with the noise that is provided , by the loading docks. We have a fifteen foot setback from the loading area which will be almost immediately adjacent to that 15 Foot seth ok, so uh, theres considerable amount of noise generated from tractor trailer rigs as they are manuvering to go into the dock or whatever, or pulling away from the dock: So its there, and it was our understanding that we could possibly see • loading as early as 6:00 o'clock in the morning, Well, I don't know to many people who would like to wake up at 6;00 o'clock in the morning with a disel rig, uh, waking them up instead of an alarm, or something, So that is a concern, the next item, is that is was our understanding, 11 . 111 ask a i' ANSCak,t T MR Pb 1-05 & al 5-05 Gage 20 • it . • • Moen, called name (inaudible), Person decline to speak because neighbors had expressed her concerns, Moen, Called two other names: (One no answer one declined, concerns expressed) , "T think you either mispronounced or overlook 5, Li Gehrong on Ash Drive, Moen, I mispronounced it, a x Gehrong, 13215 SW Ash Drive, Uh, X have been a resident of Tigard in that location for 19 years, At the time that we moved in and subsequently there to, it was understood by myself and other residences that there would be ra a buffer zone, mainly of multi dwellings or apartments houses between single family residences and the commercial zone, The other night, on friday night cir at a meeting that was held, I understand that thats been Changed. I don't think that the homeowners, with his investment, should have that sort of thing secondly, was �y will �y �y changed i11i1ii1i01ii1 secondly, when Mr, t441iii4 was mayor, you will problem remember the meeting that was conducted at the Charles Fi Tigard School, this goes back to about 10 years ago, in which we was overwhelmingly, debated, put down, the people of the neighborhood did not want Ash Street, Ash Avenue its called how, extended down, There were arguments brought up that it made easier access for fire equipment and it opened up Main street and it develop the downtown uh, city areal As recently as two years ago, the vote from the people, or the area said that they did not what it extended through, And the TRANSCRIPT !'Of Pb 1-05 & ZC 5-05 Page 12 A 11 1 ' W.• 4tr people I talk to don't like to have their will changed at this time or the immediate future, Uh, you mentioned children on Ash Street. Its a very interesting thing, the recent snow fall, the only way out you get from the lower area. , . , , . : . , , upon onto Ash Drive is to make a right turn, and I come zooming around the corner, up the incline of Ash to get up to Frewing, You can't do that. Because you know why, the kids are sleigh riding down Ash Ave, and thats it Moen, With that thats the conclusion of those in opposition of the proposal, This is the opportunity for the applicant to^ ,rebut the items in the testimony, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 35, tf I may, just briefly, before that point may I ask if it is at all appropriate as a point of order to ask if you would give any consideration to, because of the hour, and your considerations personally, uh, that you might want to set this to a date certain for the next phase of this. Because their is a substantial amount of information that would take a reasonable amount of time to review, Moen, Next phase, meaning the rebuttal, 1` 313, Yes, sir, rebuttal, and obviously your cons ideN'ation, 84 , , , , , , , , , , , , 4 , „ „ „ ,groansi , , , , ,several people talking„,„„„ asked midnight would be a reasonable hour to do that, uh, • i TRANSCRIPT rot PO) 1-85 e Zt 5-85 Page a �, • • • • press on JS, The specific issues that we want to raise is that conceptually we would like you to understand that the sight plan both city data that we have and also specific property data shows that the request on the zone change from the city engineering map, which was done before the Fanno Creek Parkway Plan and the City Hall plan, this is the 100 year floodplain, and along on the issue of the zone change, the legal description of the tax lot, of which l» own, which is 3,19 acres, which is adjoining the city shops, this part would be dedicated to the City for the park, which is a new configuration versus the mailed notices that the city staff sent out show the old configuration of Fanno Creek before USA changed it about five years ago. The creek it now down here, The 003 plan, Mr: butler, which we're familiar with also made the mistake of • showing the creek in the wrong location from the old city data, it doesn't } show it in its new location as relocated in 1977 by USA; It was an oversight made when we were first working with the NPO, when: : •4, Moen, Wheres Ash Street on there? JB, Ash street is right here it terminates at the far north end of the exiting Philadelphia Square Apartments, the property line allows for a small amount, excuse me, of above grade level ground, here, and a very small amount here: Theres over 85'1 of the property that is in the 100 year Floodplain and • this is from the aerial photography and the individual grades that we've done our boundary survey on and were submitting to the seflsitive lands hearing. We obviously concur with city staff that the major part of the site, : : , : 859 1, TRANSCRIPT t til PD 1..-85 & ACC 5-85 Page 24 is in the 100 year floodplain : . , , , , 4 . of the overall site, Of the existing b. ; use with the creek as it exist now Moen, Your talking of 85% of R •. JB, : „ . , . , , . The R-12 zone is for all the property. It includes the property that is + . . , , : this side of the creek: Moen, The questions have, Could you show us whore the property line is, uh of the whole proposal, '8, 'Directly adjoins the city shops, goes from the city shops, where the old sewer plant use to be down to the far back line, the east line of Philadelphia Square, comes across to the improved surface of Ash, and goes up Moen, 4 , 4 . , ,inauda:ble, , , , , , f` JB, , : , , ,okay, normally the line is right here along the creek, right on the edge of the creek, literally it goes into the creek, It follows the creek up to the city library, the city library's back, about fourteen hundred feet. The other point that needs to be made is that the, deal with the Parks Board and and it would deal with the NPO, consistent with the previous approval of this planned unit development, . , , , , , provision in our detailed submittal of plans to the city staff for a sidewalk, for sidewalks to be installed, which isn't the now on the Philadelphia Bquare property, a full sidewalk along up and into the end of the creek, A full sidewalk improvement, plus the city standard of 12 feet, which is the requirement ror the full street improvement TRANc.CI l:P1 POP PO 1-05 t ZO r.)-05 Page 2ri • that Commissioner Moen had asked For at the time this project was approved in 1982, You held out for full street improvements, thats what we have now, with • ownership on both sides. Secondly, the sidewalk here connecting sidewalks all along here all the way here all the way up to Highway 99, and also all along 99 and down to the city' s existing library, which will be a vacated building or other uses then. But full sidewalk access to both Main Street and Highway 99. The bikepath we will install on as prescribed and as reviewed with both the Park Department and with the planning staff, where they need to go is • where they will be installed. . . ; , ; : through here, and obviously for me make arrangements Philadelphia Square, to condition of this dc: G1opment, The one note that we didn't, because of brevity of time, will then ; , , , , , ; ; , ,that the line up you see here, consistent with the alignment you saw and what you approved two years ago is a circulars route, specifically to mitigate the impasse of a straight shot through, which the existing right-of-way provides for, and that is for the s curve their, which I certainly think will accomplish its purpose ; , , ; . The !:ae.rier is not to be taken lightly, : , + ; ; , ; , , , ; ; the specific background, the barrier is an impasse that is required by the NPO, , 7 , , , , , by city policy, that barrier is not to be removed as someone thought previously, obviously they had not look clearly at the code, ; ; , ; , , , , ; , ; + ; Hill is extended to O'Mara, , ; ; , , , , ; , . ; , two to three years maybe and little sooner, maybe a little later, Thats only one of about four other things that have to occur and 1 would be more than pleased, if the city would like to add another imposition to the opening of that, which isn't there now, and that is also the institution for a establishment of a bridge here plus the improvement, We don't care when this opens up, X'd be happy to have the city if they want, to further condition that until the city makes the improvement to The bridge 1"RANSO U P1 l=oo Pt) i-05 & "Zc 5-95 Page 26 i ..„ i .,,....,,',.,.-, ..,..,, ...i .. .,i • it _ . .., ., ` � . .. _ • 4a.. (�" Moen, t think the Ash Street situation has been throughly hashed out in the past, and x think, our we went through the whole procedure quite lengthily `F and the decision was that certain conditions on Ash Street lined out. as, The location of the barrier was not defined in the code, we specifically are suggesting a location of the barrier in negotiation with 1 . Philadelphia Square, be right here, so that they will not have any further access onto Hill but all the traffic right from the beginning of the improvement of the street with approval of Philadelphia square will be solely A through this property, Philadelphia Square from the day this improvement is completed and the barriers installed will not be utilizing Ash Street, because they will not have an access to Ash Street: Moen, Is there any other items wish c y you wY•sh to address 3'B, Comments from the NP4 Chairman, Vice Chairman, uh, Carolyn Eadon, with regards to relationship of the zone change, uh, no reason to make a zone change because they want to preserve the low density relationship, t S' respectively submit to you that the existing zoning of Philadelphia Square z Apartments is hot low density, and thats where T`m directly abutting there, is not R-4.5, is not R-7, it is multi-family Philadelphia square, And we show a large buffer, substantially in excess of the setback on that i'Jsue, The 0E4 permit which was in eXistence at the approval 102, when you and subsequently City Council approved it, is still the 1)EQ permit, which permitted 1,280 cars on that site, I plan now shows 1,137 cars. It was a TRANSCRIPT FOR PO 1-05 & Ze 15-05 Page 27 4' ' r fully engineered analysis by DEQ, the engineering that went into it was very , , . . . , Uh, we are more than willing to address the issue of grading and the ORB plan and deal with that directly subject to also review with the Park Board and any other direction we have Finally the issue of the established areas protection, Z think it is again addressed that I don't view the existing medium to high density use of Philadelphian Square Apartments as being low density residential, as we've tried to protect Picks Landing, and other areas of Tigard, where we have a medium size residential lot to another sire residential lot, Uh, the employees age, and membership of Costco, versus, the full use of the site, and other retail development which is an outright permitted use on the site, lr think, are obviously city wide n issues that you as the Planning Commission would deal with, The loading docks are substantially away from that 15 foot landscaped area, The loading docks are approximately, would be about 70 feet, 80 feet, (voice. , 40 + 10) So fifty feet, and that loading dock is for miscellaneous bread deliveries and • . r small. tucks, the other larger trucks are further in the site, we specifically gave strong attention with the tenant to the placement of the loading area, and we really hid it in comparison to where the old design had, The 2% traffic issue, , , , , < < , , , s , , , , , in regards to what Ash Street will have when its opened up and Chats from the CH2M Hill documentation, and the calculations on a eight hours day versus and , , , , , , . , hour day x have a hard time perceiving, when traffic engineers and the city does the analysis for the state, . , , , ,coughing4fi „ , twenty-four hours basis and when they know when the hours are open and when they are closed and are plan shows that we would be more than able to handle, with the approved access on Main street and Highway 99, the trafr"ic within the site. O(:her than that there, is no other rebuttal, TRANSCRIPT Fort PO i-g 'LO 5-05 Page • L. . • Moen, Close the public hearing i' Someone—, , Amen! Moen, Commissioners, we put ourselves here, so; what I think T would like to • r do is run down the line here, any questions you might have any comments. , Leverett, What do you want, questions now? Moen, Yes, Leverett, I have no questions, , tape inaUdible44 , 4 , , 4 several people talking same time, Moen, x have a questioh of stuff, the Park Master Plan shows a significant amount of the property is in the , , ,cough, , , Park way and t would like you to comment on that , 11444 , 411111144 „ 414 , 4 , 4444414 some conflict there, 44 ' I Lidei , Okay, the Park board reviewed and they said they didn't have any particular objection to it, `' q i ,� x think as far as , , 1 , 1 , 44 , , , , 1 , 1 , , , , f].Oodp�. �h wi 4h ihf ill, is /hat of lfer , , , , , , , 4 , 4 inaudible 4 4 1 , , 4 1 4 , 4 , 4 , , , 4 , , , , As far as Fahno Creek 4 4 4 ( , 4 4 1 4 1 1 , 4 , inaudible 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 411 , , , , , some variation , , , , , , allowed on the plan, some of the things that went into that plan ain't going to happen now, for instance the City Hall was TRANscotpt PA PO 1-05 & 7C 5-05 Page 20 proposed to be on the Crow site, and the lake was going to be located directly . behind the crow. Since the City has not purchased that site, I don't think that , , , i , . i , ii lake be developed , , , , : : i , i , . ; i Also our purpose is to acquire ownership or preservation of the continuous strip of land along the creek from one end to the other, as long as we are able to do that we don't have to have both sides developed, So I think that could be modified somewhat. jB,. Commissioner Moen, one brief point: , i submitted data to the City, 1 r it was two years after ORB finished their plan and what the City now uses as ' its base data, with us as property owners, as , , , , : , , , , is substantially different in many areas along the Fanno Creek Park Way than what ORB,had. ORB was schematic and was not at all tied to wht.+.t later, i , , ,cough, , , revise flood point section set by the Corp: , and if you now took the ORB plan and tied it in with the Corp, plan, you would substantial revisions, especially along this side of the creek versus the other side, • j Aa , i i , , , i sever al people talking, . r‘ •� Levoi"ett, Ism in favor of both the planned development and the proposed zone change,change, I think , 1 , , , , , 1 , t : , 4 , , , , 4 Vander ood, t are with that, s. M i ( i 1 inaudible 1 , , , , TRANSCRIPT rOR PO 1-05 & ZC 5-05 Page 10 ,•rig ....-... ,., -, '•y,i....... n,_n .... ..... ............_ .. ._ .. .. - .. ..,.., - .,. 4` _.,-. . .L ..,:.,a.Yi,w.n,..N 1..4.1. . H • Moen, I flipped this down because this is just reference that I think that, this is the plan that was submitted before. Okay, and I'm not saying that a gentleman should be held to want he did before, necessarily, uh, but in my opinion this plan had real vision for the south end of Tigard. It was really positive plan, it addressed a number of concerns that we had at the time, '{ : I've been through this thing three times with Mr, Bishop, The very first meeting I ever came as a Planning Commissioner, was the Main Street • Development, that was how many years ago, I don't know, (JD, 1979). Okay, the very first meeting I came to, and the very first time we did, we had what was at the time a Ot Joes, okay. But the basic problem we had with the development was that it was a one big large box plopped in the middle of a sea of concrete with some very few, almost none specialty shops around it. That was not what our vision of the south end of Tigard was, okay. We went through the plan process, we started out with, the Text proposal was one where there was a rather large drawing with some staged development along this edge, okay, And, the consensus at that time was, well, were putting all of that development right up against the residential area, there's got to be a more • imaginative way to put this whole thing together, okay, And, the last point t think Mr, Bishop, tame up with is this one before, and that one addressed a whole bunch of issues. It got the buildings away from the corners of the lot it created a Main Street section, okay, that was basically two streets going through here, a , , , , , , shopping area, okay, It did a number of things, another thing that it did is get rid of a one large box , , , , , , and I think it had a lot of vision, it had a restaurant and a lake and a lot of amentities, In my thinking, and its only one persons opinion, I think that we are right back to where we got a big box, almost in a sea of concrete, Its a little bit r better than that, but that store, if my inclinations are right, and I,, its closely,�. . one store, close to square footing, equivalent of a Fred TRANSCRIPT roll BOO '1-95 & ZC 5-05 Page i, • 1.v • Meyers JB Fred Meyers 235,000 square feet, this is 108. Moen, Okay I stand corrected, not to far ofEthough. Uh, also, the original part of the plan, there was a lot of development going, devoted to the park plan up there, Mr, Bishop had committed to grade the park, upgrade the park, creating a lake, doing alot of things don't see, I guess, I think that the south side of Tigard, the Anchor for Tigard, better have something thats, it is very important, the Chamber of Commerce is right, what • goes in the south end of Tigard will determine howTigard will develops as a Community in that Central Business District, I think that it meets some certain needs — « , , , , , , , , , „ for one particular customer, which r.; is admirable, But, I think sometime, Uh, I don't think its right for that ° . site, I think maybe that with some adjustment with way things are put together it could be made but with wants there I don't think see it Commissioner Butler, Butler, You said you've seen this plan, uh, but I think I've seen this plan • i . more, longer than anybody, , , , , laughter , , , , Chairperson of NPO II f who brought it through, Moen, I'm close, butler, Your close, „ coughing, , , am I iihcorreot, the conceptual. view, • 1 should we approve the use, basically that building may or may rice er�d up there, right, thats the site design re/iew and �t,hats later on, TIRANBCi ti f 1ok P1 1-05 6 ZC 5.-0 Page 12 Liden, The conceptual review you would be looking at and approving or denying the basic layout thats proposed. Butler, Basic. Liden, Everythings all moved around and the streets systems different the parking different . . . . • Butler, We already know that phase II is going to be different, Liden, Right, , , , „ , . . , ,several people talking. Butler, You think we're approving the big box . . „ (coughing/laughter) . . 4 if the big box will fly, let here fly. I am against the zone change, because /'ve been on the side of the neighbors and I've beian on the Planning Commission and I think kopt that toning as R4 2. OD for that area, and that Was many sessions not just one, and I think that ought to tay, 1 the planned development I an see the zone change I can't buy. Thats all Moen, Mr. Borgm4nn, 6, TRAN8CRIPT roo PO 1-05 & "LC 5-06 Page Bergmann, I would like to say first that I own property across Pacific Highway close enough to this to be legally notified of this project, although I feel I have no direct conflict of interest I shall be voting, I agree with our chairman to some extent that conceptually t like the buildings in the center as the former plan shows, with parking around the perimeter. But, its not going to move, and to some extent you have to let people and design what they want as long as those things that are of public interest are really taken care of, I would be in favor of both the plan approval and the zone ? ' change, so long as we tie the deed restriction parking, and the extra , , , , , , , , Moen, Mr, Peterson, A � Peterson, dell, I don't have much to add, I agree with the zone restriction • and I have concerns about the traffic, but, the centers got the right to go there I guess, and, uh, I' ll go for it, Moen, , , , , , , , , , , , , I have a question of staff, this is the general plan review, theres specific plan approval , , , , , , , , , that involves the site details in parking , , , , , , , „ , , , , , , , inaudiblei , , , 4 4144 , 41 , 1 . ti Monahan, Could be, depending on when the applicant , , , , , I - Moen, I think it would be appropriate, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , inaudible, , , , , , For a planned development is it appropriate for us to hear that, • •r TRANSCRIPT Fold Pt 1-0” & 'LC 5-05 page 84 Monahan, I don't know if you have the right to make it a condition. The way the Code, is written, it says that when more than one application are filed at the same time that are to be heard by a different body, they shall be combined into one hearing, or one application for one body, Now the conceptual plan came to you tonight, and the detailed and the Sensitive Lands where not ready at this time. It is possible, that an interpretation could be made that, since you began the hearing on the entire application, that perhaps we could combine them all together. Z'-ll check into that. The other option is that if its not possible, since we've already had one portion and theres only two portions left to go that the other two could be combined. But both of those other approval don't come before the Planning Commission. One is a Directors Decision and one is a Hearings Officer, tf only those two are combined then they would go to the Hearings Officer, Under one hearing, But if you want to make the motion that if its at all possible to combine those , , ,cough, , , together and have it come back to you, make that a motion, well check into it, Moen, I'm a little bit surprised, uh, , + ; , ; , , , planned developm6nt as far 44 , ; , , , ; Monahan, Thats not how the Code is written, The Codes written that the conceptual review is a priority of the Commission, the detailed review is the the priority of the Planning Director, , , , , , , ,interruptions, , , Moon, , , , , 4 , , Site Design Review? Monahan, to a way, TPAJSCPiPT r()$ PD 1-05 & ZC 5-85 Pate 8: • •',...vir 4 ,•. .,.. .il4{a4•..V nY}•.arV4.....u..•N.,...0:ViV3 .••. w,A...W. Moen, , • , , , : , , , inaudible Monahan, Well, thats not what the Code says, the Code was drafted specifically to outline what the duties of each one of the hearings bodies • are, And as x pointed out to you during the break, alot of the flexibility that we had in their that one body could pull up and review something else, ; . thats all out of there, because of the change in the law two years ago, that no longer can cities hold up the approval of a application beyond a 120 days, So we had to streamline our plan, and x think that was explained all along in review and the development of the new Comprehensive Plan and Code, „ • , : ; , , : : : : : , : ,several. people talking t Vanderwood, Umm that we approve Planned Development PD 1.85, per staffs conditions, • Secretary, to include • y, Don't forget part about completing the final, order and for President Moen to sign of on that final order, Vanderwood, Okay, included, { Secretary, Who's my second: (Commissioner Leverett) Fyre, Further di.scussioh`7 Moen, Further discussion`? • `f"tANSCRIPI FOR PO 1-05 & 7 5-05 gage 86 4Sf� ' I n t Butler, I have a point I would like to bring up, since you were saying theres a lot of grading and stuff on the original, when this came through a long time ' r ago, I wonder if we could put something in there to the fact that the Hearings Officer, when she looks at the Sensitive Lands would look at that again, Uh, coordinate the grading, the pedestrian/bikepath which is whatever, I know the original ORB Fanno Creek Study may not be accurate, but , , i . + , Parks Board would like to see happen. Can we have them put that as part of a condition under 1, Vanderwood, I have no problem with that, Leverett, Thats fine, Secretary, 444iii44i0 . clarify, , , . . , , Liden, Just add the condition one you just what another sentence, 1, Butler, Just another, sentence that the original. ORB' Panno Creek Study Park Master Plan, or as designed by the Park Board, uh, shall be address and the ,. ." pedestrian/bikepath located along with grading plans coordinate, Thats up to her to figure out what exactly that i , , i , i i , , t i i , park board to figure that fi all out, ff Moen, further Oiscussi.o n? Cal.l for the question all those ih favor of the motion made and seconded signify by saying ayes Leverett, Campbell, Underwood, Bergmann, Peterson, and Leverett, aye, TRAM CIIPT IOI PO 1-0 5 & ZC 5-06 Page 87 T N■•• Those opposed, Nay Moen and Fyre, Moen, Motion carries, uh six to two. Okay second one. Commissioner Campbell, Uh, Approve ZC 5-85 along with • Secretary, We also need findings with the approval. • Campbell, Findings on that? Secretary, Yes, Campbell, Also, , , , , , „ (coughing) , , , , , , Liden, Right now, I have the relevant criteria, goals statewide planning goals 1 and 2 and we say there that the proposal meets those, Those are more procedural. The only thing that 1, uh, that seems to pertain to this is section 18,66,030 of the Code, which indicates that the subject property, as well and 4e , 4ii parcels shall be be uh, What would you like to Use &S 'a interpretation or a fihdihg, Ahyway, I was just saying that 1 % 14414Y state goals are more procedural that 444iiolti4iiiii what would be your finding ih support of the he change, We have one portion of the Code that says this portion of the Code says that this area will be developed according to R-12 criteria, Uh, is there something in the plan or uh, we were discussion some of the things buffer one [ TRANSCRIPT POR PO 1-05 zC 5-05 Page 8 0 Butler, Is that just a zone change or a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, when you talk about changing that from R-12 to CE3D. Liden, Just a zone change, Campbell, inaudible. , , . , " Liden, Right, it has a Comprehensive plan, I mean a Central Business District Plan designation so it is only a zone change. I Campbell, „ . „ , .inaudible, , , . . , Liden, If you go along with the deed restriction for parking, I guess you could look at is as not really circumventing the intent, your just allowing the establishment of a parking lot under the Sensitive Lands procedure where if it remained R-12 it wouldn't be permitted, , , , , , , , ,several people talking. , butler, Is that subject to the Sensitive Lands permit also? Secretary, Okay, do I have a second? bean did, okay. Moen, The motion has been made a seconded all those in favor of the motion signify by saying Aye, Commissioners, Leverett, Vanderwood, Campbell, Bergmann, and Peterson, Aye, `hose opposed, Nay, butler, F:yre, Moen, ti Moen, Motion carries 5 to 3 , TRANSCRIPT FOR pt) 1-05 & VI 5-05 page 3 • Moen, - - - -noise, I would like to just make a note that the Decision • of the Director on a detailed development plan maybe we feel that the i applicant + Commission , . , . r . + Monahan, Appealed to the Planning Commission, Hearing Closed • c 1 . p ' A TM TRANSCRXPT rOR Pb 1-85 & ZC 5-85 Page 40 L April 2, 1985 Mr. William Monahan, Director of Planning & Development Tigard Planning Staff Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council City of Tigard 12755 S. W. Ash Avenue Tigard, Oregon, 97223» Dear Members: This letter is in reference to J. B. Bishop's request for conceptual and detailed planned development approval for a 228,000 square foot retail center and related facilities on a 21. 8 acre parcel. We do not wish a zone change from R7-.12 on the parcel of land adjacent to the Philadelphia Square Apartments as we do not want any more commercial development along the Fanno Creek Parkway. Any further developrrent will destroy what is left of our Greenway and wildlife including the nesting ducks and Pheasants. We are concerned about the proposed street patterns in the above planned development. I-.'.is stated in the City of Tigard Comprehenseive Plan that establided low density neighborhoods are to be protected. There is a street in this plan that goes from Ash Avenue along Fanno Creek and out to Pacific Higheay with a short Street branching off into Main Street. Thus connecting a major arterial highway and well-traveled Main Street with existing low density neighborhoods. When the completion of Ash Avenue to Bur aam Street occurs in the future, the traffic volume limit �:. allowed on residential streets will greatly exceed the limit if these proposed streets. are allowed as they will create a problem of noise and pollution in these low density single family heighborhoods. We would appreciate a new traffic study and the inclusion of Century 21 Properties new development of 64 homes on the Omara Sitp which includes the extension of Hill Street to Omara. (Not on previous traffic .ana :ysis�, Please put yourself in the position of the residents living in these neighborhoods with the negative impact of e xcessive traffic n oise and air pollution which would destroy t he l ivability of these established areas. Thank you: Sincerely, !M Paul and G oria Johnson 9100 8 W, Hill street Tigard) Oregon, 97223, ------------------ o.. • r • • April 2, 1985 Mr. A. Donald Moen, Chairman • Tigard Planning Commission 12755 S.W. Ash Avenue • Tigard, OR 97223 Reference: PD 1-85 and ZC 5,-85 • Dear Mr. Moen: The Tigard Economic Development Committee met on Monday, April 1, 1985, to consider the Main Street Project proposed by J. B. Bishop. Four of the nine Committee members were present and reviewed the proposal with the developer at the Special Meeting. The members present chose nat to take a position on the zone change requested. The Committee members did find that the proposed development is in the best interests of the City and fits into the central business district plan. Therefore, the Committee supports the project as it will provide a much needed shot in the arm to the area. Sincerely, • LA-6„..„ • Bruce Clark, Chairman, Economic Development Committee (BC br/1151P) • t ..... .. ... ...,-i. -,...._- . ., U} _^W:"YM,Nw.n•am..p.M+x.xr;wnnMU , w,iuvi m! »w,.yt ...x...., rWN a 7.].B ruaAAe.r,A[tnp w41cmJ Va Mx'. .nxM,w. — ., T.■ , ......--- - .,_____ ____ ___ . ,_ _ , _ . 1 •,.., .1'. •.,,' ...... . . . . , . . . . . . . . t , . Olt"' lib : reTTIA L.-I t)e to rtiw. „t, ..,,J,01001 cakiktk ey. 1,., PC,...0,-,An,,t," (7,„.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, V.. . /1 € t't ,',',, A. G , . iirvN,, c.„,•vy-,' to c,.(f.- , , p b 1 ,,,,,8,5: 4r c: t;. .sr,, , . . . .., .... . .•....,: . .**/a, ■t a hrI 1, 8 . .:..,:. 'K ei rk • " , ,. ,„.. • . -E. tovg,..,e4 it-t- So 1 totk,.$ ; v S-ov- 11,,,,,,e,„.. .c),„.,, t, vo_. . • , . . . z r , . , . ,. . ., i , ... i. .. . 1 ,....0....„4 sc 0„,,p.,tre P -4r..co-N, ) / , . ,. . , • , . .. .. w ); go , I/0-C, 3 k./7t- .,. ai#A ar ' :;:t.).5 -1-1. i-r 'LZI te- ett-v-% .3 i v • T 0 b I 30.s# A , :' i . • x,.‘ r Lr) 2 tr: Gr- b.-1 v.:(j _ P . . .. . cc§ 6 La-t>1 11,....t. ()Re) F-70.4ev,...0 Credic ko,z..44or (o-if tt- Pic'" , • ,. . . t=1 r."4 /":"'" el° 'ir .w. . LL. Z k C) C5:''„I, _k N\- N't t,,,) .' ga rtie. Es) Ft o(kr v,tx.t vm, k,0 t4,41,0,.4 v.) Lo ci..- 7:,;14 e(k.,. .'i:.:.. Di . , Ci o- i- Le. (..., te ri4---.8. Lotlir- 11„,,,,t,. .r:..§1.) tic!)‘.,,,,4`1 tp--). . . . ,c.Y.:.'-' ii, t.,--,t,, c*., \--oH a v 4z,.._. rfrc,,,)tin, , . D 1-1-0 0.0 t s .1:1.4 ,O (31 P10,,,te, 4E-0 cØ 14 . ., • ,... , b tti,*t.4 (I,o'uctor to41...041- PL)..lel te,.,,s: 124 r it'-.-4'., 3. , (0'4 I 44 it) ,I • I, ; ■ I . • I' 2.) t""). ."Q'C 1 LA. r4,,., 61.c.k., 0.N,---.'-'' C 6 VYN iis.,--.0,4,71-t" . . . ' ''- .0,„ 10,6„,„.Y K li›0 .3r I , .. . / ,33, w ,\.,,) 1 4. otl.„.t,,,(!, yek 0 Lcit 64,,,c k . . . . i c_., 1:1 o.,,..,(i!,, .,o,,:. :h:„..1.vh, r v,A .n...... ..17.k..i , ? ''' a' ' ' ... Sz ,,,:'k L.,,,. . 1,),„„to, et$ 0 . . . . . . .. . _ . , . C.te . c , . ,.. . . r pc.41, ,, ,:e...,,.. .:,, es+,,,, .,6''A''-i' VC'el ‘Az•-::%.Ye 14---e--,-(0,gt,'" ''; ,, . .. A H-t),,,A. i 3 ttl.'. .e. ....,tu ek.iti p-•410-sti,,----,A.'S eA Seot,.0.0"-tei ,' ‘: 6-0,hrty,5, y4:1, ,..k4z.b , •; ()ft tl, t,Piko,,,kir Poor K., l',1_6.1.4, 44 ra,,,,,, ,. ,. •. ,. ,,. eo t i 4). , .) ,(Aj kx,30%, '1,ri, t.tt,to: 4 vs,,4?..340.$.3„, .ke'110',,, ... . ., d.. 0. vt. ,,,,,,, )vi,,,,,,,t?,,,, t' es,:c.,- 17-r,vA,,,,,,,,, c.,J,,,,,, 4 a. tec, . . c i,01,1A..t•Po ,41!"! .. . pc . . , .. • ..„...,.........:... .............„...„,,,,„,...„,„ . . , - ,,•. . ,. , ,. .. .• „.,..,.......„,,_, ,...,...,.........,..,..I'' '","'',......'.'"',1,,..1,1,..,:t1,..11..,,,,,,,6, 4,,,,,0,,, ' ' 11 • R MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Members of the Planning Commission April 1, 1985 FROM: William A, Monahan, Director of Community Development • SUBECT; Main Street Project, PD 1-85, ZC 5-85 • Gary Ott, Chairman of NPO #1 called me at 11;40 A.M. on April 1, 1985, to report the results of NPO #1's special mooting of March 29, 1985. NPO #1 had four members present voting on the project, The results of the vote were; 1) A 4-0 consensus to recommend denial of ZC 5-85, 2) A motion to support the staff report recommending approval of PD 1-85, Conceptual Pion Approval, received a 2-2 vote. Therefore, there was no consensus on the PD. NPO Ws objections related to traffic in particular; 1) Ash Avenue and ts1 eventual opening for through traffic, and 2) Access from Hwy, 90 and how it connects through to Ash Avenue, • ir (WAMtbr/1148P) • 1 , • • //fl41. r)(11:0„rip -e5t -r■2 174 E3 (4,-,t-qa-pd ne P 1 cc? 212 4;51 /7. "10e1 /1D fp/ rn - 1 Qclive ne- / t :14 /?o/u/ y piy.t Al ,...c 47 p...27,4* 19,2 „( 5, , .p7 ,ty.Ty?4.-/ ;,7( -i-•.54 Crd) 9-",:e. 67 ?A 44,7,,.,.7 -.0 P•4',4-4. -7,... ,s,,,,,),s7' od .,,.7 44,9 7/--7.-ep.-i ?P/71 . 1, Pi!, 7,,,-- /9,4,24-1,1,7a-,?142 ,:p.7 074 74..?....,,,,74 rs-, c(i (y ie:), ....x/.,--.4,..2 r 1 5- 10 i),';',71.7' (Iv/7,s"..,,./ /PP A 7-41 74,774 /T 0,1 C/ ?f,e7-e"-(4' /9-7 1-4-.?*7/-7 41/ ' C-7 . .-? e r c-,c,5', '& 7p,rodc-4-?Cl Z''''4,2 07 '7:3- 1;d1),7,5—,F ,y '7 /1.„...1 0..ec:PCI to r 77 p 4..i.,tir.,,,t-f-04.),..4.7 oil / ? /.7 cy., oo 77/ l7 ? f1-1 e, 67-,fit,Pa 7;l4 (.2cW 7:2,p p f„, /11 a' 4f-el /14-A7 7L5" - r "7 74"e3-14.5' d, •Z 7Z-, (rd. 7;4-?/1 r .7/7/ q?5,5,/ t• p.e -51e 6( / r., /62 co l7 1e4,757 7.eo A67-/-,1,7) p _ . - •■••■•+MIW , _ • , (, ( March 28, 1985 City of Tigard op/ PR Et II rtID ,1/4 licl11 — I% .1, 1985 . Planning Commission . Tigard, Or aY OF 1- GARD 97223 PLANNING DEPT .....1, Members: , Re: Main Street Land Corporation Development ' PD 1-85 and ZO 5-85 , As residents of the neighborhood abuting the proposed • development on lower Ash Avenue, we have several questions . and comments we feel need your most careful consideration. . 1) The preliminary plans indicate that the building size is enormous and would absolutely overwhelm the adjacent residences . To give you an idea of the magnitude of the proposed building, it is of a comparable size to the = Beaverton Fred Meyers . 2) We believe it should be a condition of the Planning , t Commission or Council to review design of building(s) . ,. As we understand now the building is to be a tip up = concrete with brushed surface painted in a muted beige , without any break in design, different colors , offset . . doorways , fascia, and windows . .s. I 3) Comment No. 2 prompts us to question the fact that the building has been placed in the correct zone . The property has been zoned as Commercial Development but this particular building resembles a warehouse and is more \ indicative of industrial zoning. Indeed, its function is 4 more typical of a warehouse . , 4) There is also coqcern on roof screening and noise .,0 pollution. For instance , where will air conditioning units be placed. If on the roof, unless some quieting . device is used, noise levels cold be unacceptable to adjoining homes . Screening of roof so thoce homes further upon hill would not observe a distasteful tar roof . Should be complimentary to neighborhood. . 5) Parking lot lijihting could also present a problem during evening hours . We would find it an infringE.ment of our • privaoy to be illuminated like a neon sign in our back yards which face the development. 1 6) The zone change from R-12 to CBD zoning would be against NPO #1 policy. The zone R-12 was created as a buffer between • commercial and residontial. 7) Lastly, what is the proiected traffic impact on al, Idy . , congested streets . ,. Page 2 • These are a few of our concerns about the development and the enormous impact it will have on our neighborhood and the quality of our personal lives . We have fought long and hard to maintain the integrity of this area located as it is next to the City of Tigard. We have never been anti-development for the City, we just want any develop- ment to be compatible with our small community. Thank you. A.ft Atii" /e" Yienlad: • Mr. and Mrs. J . R. McBath 13115 S . W. Ash Drive Tigard, Or 97223 cc t NPO #1 fA, 1 . • • • • • • 4A , 100RECONe " sw , 01:4 ' , p104 .11 ,111.111. 4 .06 .44v• P.O, BOX 127 0 TUALATIN, OREGON 97062 e PHONE 682-2601 0'.1 R MAIN STREET CENTER arch 28, 198$ 2 $W MAIN ST APR 3 M;985 CITY OF TIGARD 13670— 1 • SITE-037• 000 Cli Y L.* 1GAKD Insp. Type : RSW Dear Keith Eiden PLANNING DEPT The following items were noted on the preliminary site plans for Main Street Development. Developer of this project shall provide Opticom Control in- stalled on the new traffic signal to be installed on Pacific Highway at the southwest corner of the property. The Fire District would propose that the barrier located at the corner of S. W. Ash and S. W. Hill street be a gate type with cuttable padlock so that access can be gained during emergency operations. Gate opening shall be not less than 20—feet. Submit one copy of detailed engineering plans on water sys- tem and street layout to this office for review. This office would request that a joint meeting be called with 8oh Santee of the Tigard Water District, and me, to cover • water main sl.zing location and hydrant locatior prior to final suhetition for plan review. If you desire a conference regarding this plan review or if • you have questions/ please feel free to contact me at (503)41 692-2601. • Si ( 4. . ' 8 e e irchi Fire Prevention 8ureau 41k . (pc) t...-- O s"....0,„ ....6AFFIDAVIT,IT, OF AILING 0., 5" ., rb P' STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, uarg7d ML Dickhous , being first duly sworn, on oath depose and say: , That I am an office aide for The City of Tigard, Oregon. ' •• That I served notice of hearing of the Tigard Planning Commission of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each of the following named persons on the _ a day of _march , 1984' by mailing to each of them at the address shown on the attached list (Marked Exhibit g) , said notice as hereto attached, desposited in the United States Mail on the uud day of 6 March , 19877' postage prepaid. Ail 4oi.'yicihous i c' MUMMY�i OFFICE AIDE ‘,. r.si .. i . , iLA ...44.1...-". .. Person who delivc =ed to POST OFFICE Subscribed and sworn to be foie me on the day Of 1'7,e/ : 4._ , 198 L4 a i i" M' ■ ' ZO,O7 '. 62eLlie , NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON 1 ' "Mr, My ommbssion gkp lre5: 97-JcP-10- 7 r ' 4 • , —... ., ,,.. .. ,,.. .,,. ,, ,,,,,,,,,, , .,i.. .,... ,w., ., ..,,., .,.+ ........... . ..,..,. + .° .,`. ....,i., ,. M... a, _ -„ i3J:',. .m.W6,e..a.x.r:rr..c.:.......H' .a.e,.,,.na w.xF,: • r t w .. ..,: M CITYOFTIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION °ct 26 A 12X ler Jto CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 3397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY . CASE NO. • RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: ' DATE: 1. GENERAL INFORMATION App]' -„ation elements submitted: .a PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION 5t7 c"o w Gh v, d( A it (A) Application form (1) 1.✓;' 4.;i1/14. •i!1[gieff • ay, /' e,'rG ; kt y. (B) Owner's signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO,, j 6e/A4,e/v11 r; •�d/S • authorization • d of �d�30�' (C) Title transfer instrument (1) s . (D) Assessor's map (1) SITE SIZE �?/�Jr,,�i�u2eJ' 3�' .3t', f, , PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER*A ,n /iP1t' *rt?r. __r___(E) Plot plan (15 copies) ADDRESS Some ,, 03,,/ares*,1`J 4mmr:�e 1/t4 'HONE „S ' 'L,.r �(F) Applicant's statement k' CITY � aeDrwr+r ZIP / (15 copies) i . r � � V . .i. APPLICANT* ✓J4 • .. •;/el;`.:6, t-L. a e ✓dekI# d 1 (G) List of property owner i s • `hid, .es �`.4 .t ADDRESS e 441/(0) , PHONE C Lei within 250 feet (1) • CITY ZIP (H) Filing fee ($600) r . . , *When the owner and the applicant are different eo le� applicant must be the purchaser of record J�.� P P , the a li p . ot a leases in possession with written authorization DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: ' from the owner or an agent of the owner with written ; ', authorization. st sign this , The owner(s) application in the Space rovided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE:. submit a written authorization with this a lication. • . PP COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY 4 . : The owners of record of the subject property . tequeet permission to o l reate a Platted N.F.O. Nimber. . Development ss � 4 . � . � Cottce foal P PP i p Plat A royal Date. . ,t C 3�J/� � �i � ,Z,G/✓ ' . ��, e ci eta c.f Cry --.-:---- !( 'irt art ',41441. .1/3 ,j ,?t Wed. 742e i ref ert,J , Detailed Plan Approval Date. /htrt ,rffet` °rt, co yell i .o rs l�i"e ��, !2 r„aa Plarinl «Cr/G� jrC ,gyp IA/6 ‘” b0 �_..__.. ,,r� ,folef '4'l 'fit 41.4. 04: r ...1' tl hie/ct ',+n,14 ✓.0 Si 7 54041.4 � �' �e 0ru f104,1/e��,;� `` `•'. 1'1 r"�,.r,,/f; /J 4 , 11 Engineering .. . -�f��'��Al 0 ��%�' t!rMl,�"�; + r ,� ,�i�, � '"ice' .- , .. ' im�-ecit!d'er1 et.i" 64 0( A orA,j"6 a 71 ' r1 r r r1;01 ;/ / , X ! , . V 4 4. . List any variance, subdivision, sensitive lands, or other land use actions to } . be considered as part of this application: ,Z,,;� 'M„ .,. 4..._,„' x,, c� . .R"0 ,,, fed i 1 �• (} '' . �� 'gyp '° �t"k�� /h*•+• A + /j °jt ri. /�t�'.v rk�t.. a..c..�.�y r,.., l' L ,y��+� {� � /' /M. �i t°bw4Cf{ 'i GWk+� - �.Glii'�+j ai (/"L C�F'cu+�i t;/ •b `r r `'? J��i�7��/' `'^4 ^�" 'h/* '-�d Y��i L ✓r 5. Applicants: To D'have a complete/ application you Will need to submit the . information desckibed in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. y. 6. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: ' • A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be • attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • E. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights ,, .• granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and . limitations of the approval. • Co All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this � ' , • �. application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. j . b. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. t • DATED this 0V — day of "Ae . 19 eei Cg wife) property, ' ' SIGNATURES Of each owner (ego husband and wife of the subject ro erty, W p.,, :. .... yrr c es ;:, , . . . . . . 6 k I f 'A ' (101.tpti/O5260 I, �I II I whe,rc two are peruu,t teat. And a zone �. chi, •� from R;12 to CBD for Western porCion of Lot 300 Map 2S1 2DB REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS TO: A) ' •yr• ( ii DATE: 3/21/85 FROM: Tigard Planning Deparwtment ° I 0 RE: Request by MAIN S'T'REET LAND CORP. for conceptutal an•, detaile,. tanned development approval for a 228,000 sq. ft. retail center and related facilities on a 21 .:8 acre property zoned CBD (PD (Central Business District, Planned Dev.) & R-12 (Residential 12 units/acre located on the SW corner of Main St. acid Pacific • Hwy. 2S 1 2 4C lot 1200„ 1300; 1400, 1500, 1600, 2200, 2300, 2301 & 201; 2S 1 2DB Attached is the Site Plan. and applicant's statement for your review. From 300 & information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other 301 information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by March 26th , 19 85 . You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. Ifo u are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and 4 confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have, any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O. Box 23397, Burnham and Ash Ave. , Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 6394171. STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden ; ', , PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING► ITEMS THAT APPLY We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. , i , Please contact of our office. t.,--. Please refer to the enclosed k . ic.r\ , ,a , r .:...._. ..3. Written comments ■ ''°'S ,�.�"` /2.0...74.e........ :a l 40#1 ':2 , 2 :a, ;�. ;*eze ''fir 0,41 e",u.b•. ' 7,,i ,, -P - .-0'," :eir --,,l ',±�,, ''`'e-„"'w,P � 7 ` '�'R� 7' ,,fr a 4e44-, /t ..5..5.,- +4 `... frwei'c,, `r =-":44° . ' is Ai,,n ,nr i�s•,.y .O �"`h.n„�'! . . '" ° di ” 144 . N me of f Pet io11 Co1nrnetit Lli j,�s,. 'krll�`E-.a .. ' A ,,,� -.. -,.., xui.r. 1 Phone No. ol e '../e/er e,t?(KSL,prii/U3 6l ) �! . (//747a /0(44., /0,',‘4. 1,eerf' o-, aty)„.0,-,,,,,,,,,i,/s• , 114,0,4 j,i 91'io ,4"Cill " re-elf e w u y . • • • • . / e,a7 ,04,4 -t4,- / 04Wefroi.004174( >4 494407,1 t 6/01 ‘'etJ . , e/47 7% 74' • ireels, Avow 4.,.,,fdritri/, de 000:74,,f/e-effage /6%x ‘.. peoied,sef •• • •.!, . . , • n.. 1 . 11 4 • a ; • . ., , • • / °: when two are permitted. And a zone chik a from R-712 to CBD for Western • portion of Lot 300 Map 2S1 2DB REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS TO: f)/ ,'° /,(„�1� DATE: _____121 /85 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: Iteauest by MAIN STREET LAND CORP. for conceptutal and detailed planned development approval for a 228,000 sq. ft. retail center and related facilities on a 2ia8 acre property zoned CBD (PD (Central Business District Planned Dev.) & R-12 (Residential 12 units/acre located on the SW corner of Main St. and Pacifi Hwy. 2S 1 2ZC lot 1200, 1300;1 1400, 1500, 1600, 2200, 2300, 2301 & 20.1; 2S1 2DB Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From 300 & information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other 301 information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. • If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by March �.. • 26th , 19 85 . You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If You are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have, any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O. Box 23397, Burnham and Ash Ave. , Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639-4171. • STAFF CONTA Keith Liden CT: PLEAS CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. --.. proposal objections Please contact __�____• . of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letters Written comments: , • Nanl!. of Pert,.ti Co itug • o tltone Noel II 061 ( SL:pm/O356P) • • — I1 Y.h-"ata+d!'.Wtµw, i • Also: request for third free standing sign. where- f-wo. are permitted. And a zone • sr chad from R4712 to C'3D for Western portion of Lot 300 Map 2S1 2DB REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS TO: 4, , ,% 1 ! TE: 3 . , fop / FROM: Tigard Planning Department r 4.P, S RE: Request by__MAIN STREET LAND CORP. for conceptutal and detailed planned development approval for a 228:000 sq. ft. retail center and related facilities ' on a 21 :8 acre property zoned CBD (PD (Central Business Distrct, Planned Dev.) & R-12 (Residential 12 units/acre located on the SW corner of Main St. and Pacific •- . IT76777281 2 C lot 1200, 1300,a 1400, 1500, 1600, 2200, 2300, 2301 & 204; 2SI 2DB Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From 300 & information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other 301 information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by March 26th , 19 85 . You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to m8pond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have, any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O. Box 23397, Burnham and Ash Ave. , Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden PLEASE CRECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. • Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments: • a f •N V • , Name: of Perron Commenting:, Phone No. (KSL+ptti/O356t) "=", s . • • 1' , , NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS :r 1. /iNPO No. r-__.____ CPO No. r 2. CITY DEPARTMENTS /Building Inspector "'Engineering-Randy _____ Engineering-Frank/John Parks and Recreation 3. SPET DISTRICTS Tualatin R.F.P.D. Metzger W.D. -____ - Washington Co. E.D. No. 1 School Dist. No. 48 (Beaverton) _____-.... Tigard W.D. School Dist. No. 23J (Tigard) 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS , City Council Wash.Co, Land Use & Trans.Dept. Planning Commission Boundary Commission ----- Planning Department METRO 5. STATE AGENCIES ----- Aeronautics Div. (ODOT) DOGAMI • Engineer Division of State Lands ,Board of Health _ Commerce Dept. - M.H. Park 7 highway Div. - Terry Flink r Fish & Wildlife Parks & Recrea. Div. (ODOT) LCDC ' on.................. Subdivision Supervisor PUC Dept. of Energy Fire Marshall. Dept. of Envi ron. Quality Other • 6. FEDERAL AGENCIES Corps of Engineers __.. Other Post Office. i 7. SPECIAL AGENCIES ' "'i General Telephone Portland General Electric ' Paeific OorthWest Bell Other Northwest Natural Cos Pr o• 8. REQUESTS FOR COMMENT SENT ,1 41 M . AwLie„AoT: is (KSL;pm/O 56P) s • •'. ., "1:..M +k.:.^'a'sa i7.Yi,..., yx awn.µufwe.r+, lr.x.w«,uivWUYnra.uMw.-,.ymr:r.w,y+N 1V. M`I.yrff�•'Wi j, k ..zC1 C, ,n,.t,. i. [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] e i ,e ■ • . /24117 I/4, * Zip' . 1 , a 7.rrd; i/ ‘44471,440 #,.ce,i- %� dr. 4 %222., E' /7, ,'r7 d/eea"/ A ,2 /,,?,3e," 49,fr4k4: d'� y,�t5 4,�r' t r bew. d/vrr.4r �%' . Atirle/tv.-4 2.44.-A,7y/efx.4rtede/%.„... ,,,-.4,44,74c . : . ' flt4 Cove#04,41 -�ti �'` vz ', 4.(117, „ ,,, 44M . . 41,44, 40,4,47,4 A".4,-t.w..c. r , i'` 41-4414-ft 4)11/4,44.14' Tf:2 �•�r ' .. i`✓T�T'�'sr' " ,, vim'? 74;-t:10 e, . /4. _1 ,. 4-/11 40-elr , .,47 41 2 49 -�, 4. .,/,e tva i 0-fr. .,,,,./.. e?,,P.,-404,-,t," ,614-÷te,,,,744-Pit ito- 40e64,...4.44‘,4/ -OY,Lcept ,treleI TMGi . r /4614 ✓jwVW -ez ent' u6 ir,,.• .. ,-w -,4„.Gi i4.ey.,,44, 7'/ .tJ4 /e 44, ter , ei-e-r,0,7 4(.4 4%. "40,4/40.t. /Are/4447 Cl'el,14'Ye, , ' C r� �vt-C/.x � �r-�-/;,�,;�t; f,,- ,,�w�• .�;,.e , , / 'co (4,02.4x,40:14.tf.//.,,3,"0 •t ,ert.:.ti ., A- "0" C 1� - ten,t.. &.. , W �4/ ,,,,,,4 A;44.1' ' a ;.." ,.. 7� 4 ": . .. i.e., 4t-7.4/4.6,14.4.,..ex,tif 4, „ot.wii.,4,(..„0. 1-r1.44/ , 164 1,4 .. AZede.',1 ;41 tiera",,,, ,,A.eir . , )-4,, ,ge.;1.,, . �6". ., —4. c 1 d, � � r / y , � eft. uL .:i ,t w •C C, , i i . :" " r►;iN� t,I a r . , ,41,2 ,41 6t4',4e,41$%!. t/6071,C.e..evit., , ,.• /r%-7,e zzG ,¢ .r%u641.41? r /"A ?..../7e7:, _ 44 -e7;7.. . ,' :. - 497,4e 45 (0-7,,1,,ilLiv-e .e.(4-ca,/,' ,e,/,,,ed rio 4.. . /.,„.„:4e..`;.;/ixe. A' _. U r --- - - , . . . r.'4.,, av er i(ky e'e-,ti,c o Md-ezi.de„ .:..r'f xe1 / r.•-,---- - 8,44/ -‘izeit„44'n'er . . . . ,,e44/4e".44:,--",,e,„. ,74v... 1,40,1_,„eve.,, , 7,7444,ate,„.,..e ' •,,,. ,. . jA te‘t7,..,.,, 45-2,....7,,,,,,,#,i4,1 ,,ta a.,, Lpi...vii,at,t,;240t.4-66.0,60,4,,e...,74. . . 4,11,e1(t;0- A,614,-Aessi, # ,,,,At- ' ,Ar/ ,/,/?„-& , - ' ,, . ‘;,„_,,,,,...0..A,,,,* ; ..,,c . _,e,yip4e-V-e-ol 51//".4„, /.. 2-8,4,?5,17,,,,4,,,?4-A . . eikvi,,,,,,pir,,i.f...e.;:e."0-4-04,,,,,,,..."-"re,n. v-/-- >fre',kv-44 ...;. • z. .4-0,-/leren ,,,,,-La 0e-di,- — ' . U .. / I .9..m 7 joeoo-ei -,Zej, ,, --,,, e-t,/,' 72-' .;,--e - t 41.14),-, r - 7 PYC i r(2o e-9►' /0'6 A, 1r 1A4- . .:0>; 1 +%r, .,,a,4,;?,,,e-4,-e4.,, 4,)4..,41:-.,/-. . ',44.:&., 7,4,,,,.,--,-..,y, 4.-/A,,e- ...2:::q.7/,e,01-,14 '... /, /, , . 7„,e,444/.. ,44:‘,/,6, / elf 4 14401 -( .etr/..t Grp 41-4 t • G(4.4i44t-c-t. -414 ite.,,t): u.a- et.r...4e,Ve, ,OA&t.4 • .,0 ' fr, C't14°-e"?:44/* v i, ,r[Gf ..24 •mac: 4 %'w :4 r . ,, 4"—,.. r+i..1,Cx -, .. . ,.. .. . e,le. 6.44,,, ,/,4//„..X-.4-4434t,e,„petist,;,,elteV„al),--. ,,,e:e... : { 1-...• .... ,,,,( 7 ,4.,,,,,. ,,,,:. 41-1:74,,e4-'0 44,41,,,e" 'A — ' ' , 414,ii ‘)00A-44-r-e;o; ”fre./.?, /„T":1":# I , itirct-4, 15.,. %� r i ' ,g,:le•0 l' ik70.4,4÷. ,,eg; , •4 . .. . ... .. ... . . . .. . . . . . . , • .. . ,... . . . . . . , . . . . . ... . . . . • -.—...., . ,,, •... .. , % „ ,„............r::..., . . .--- i, ,!.------- 11. .)., . . •. . r ., . . .,. .. . mit . . . . . .... it.. e .......4 . r 1.• . , 8. g 1 1 : , . .. . . . ft. 1 t .. ;. . . . . 1 ,, . "-144 411,. 1 i 1 . MI,_ft_ . .. ,---ft,-#1.14i, 7 f'' 1 , ..••• • , ,,fo, .. ,Iltiin ,,,,Im,,,,, 111. •' ' 11#1 ' . 1 ■ 11 .....,...1 / ' . ' .41/4*°"11,,_10,,,,,''".1,,,, "'1",4149 AA., '''4;4:. 4011,'1 at"......,. . /1 1'... .4*fil), I 0.,;47*.•47.,Av'.44,itkr ".1.,,,.:7 I I .,1 .*. .. , ii: L,,,_. , . . t . r ' " I'..k...N. ''*'.'"::-,‘Z .”-1--,.7 "::.7-..-.'.....L:.--:-.-...„,,,, • . 1" '1 / . ..It, • 0 • •-• . . . •••.■ /4'. " 4. .'145;;Ailty' tfriiiii . . i, .0, _ ,kat_0.316.4.. ,' '.411,..'44.. -•...-.... .:':' .......:1....'''' '-''. _ . . rjlir''' $4111$:"'"2 .......,••■.“.......-..............,■.........1.......■+, 11 r . . Arl Ap 0-1 • . . .. 4' 4 ..i !..1 it'•-.: 8 . .. '1,■ . 0 . . 12 . . " • I Ilt 1 i . . . . •:' i ../0. . . . . . . .. ..• .•• . .,„ ,. • . ‘,..• • ..• ,.. ,. . .• 1. 4. '',4111 ',4/0„ . - . . .. . . 1 11, O. .. ,. . i P - 1 #.5. i i _ . poilt , ;. l', II4t, .117C1M ' ff..: 1 I I . oil I . . . I 2 g . • I . , . r k i 1 . 'A I §g a ..1 V . . .•. -1 . . x . A ..,.....,.....1 •-1 4 , • I . ' 1 t , .... I ' k 7 . .,..w? . .i.i• Si. , x . )11, •11' i I g : . ..,.. ., . . :. 1..:. -.,. 1■.., . i i . . ....... . , .,. . iii■ -it V . . 0 ; , .. . . . V. -1i 1 , . 1 . i , . '1. I I . ii' 11 11 Oil. t 1 , t 111/ N., ... 't'-' 1 1 ,,,t. /......... '.1Z7;35. '' ' ' . • . ' . 4 ir"w--- . . ' • .. : .:let i„. ..,,..., i,,,L, ...r— . . 1 ill , . • , • ..! 0 -it; ... iff . , Z 4;`''' -.:' : , :If ' : ' liliNr*.' .1 . % [ '''4‘f '' ' " r.,„i. i r,r. 1 1, . ... . .r,„ it, g .., i . obi ,. •I, • _•..,,,. 't v., , , ,. •• < . . ,. . 1 , ' e_— •.... ,, - '..::'....\,..,'...''■,..„..• . . . . Pi 1 .c. -.•itzr.i. :„....4i. ,,„ 11 ., : 41, , P . , .. • ' IT f `'. .1.1 litilti . . . „., . 7,,------)„,-.-- ti--: .„,.. , ,,•_ ,.,.,jih, 4 1-i gp la i' • L4.1,A.F" ' ',1-----,, ,,,Iii.,, ,:740,11 is& a . 1r of 4 ' -11.111 . ...... , . ,i,, , -. err • i......i....,4. ,.. e:',,•..1,,,,,,pa.+.,..,,,,.,-..., :. 4 A Al • .46.4'0' , ke AV,W61 11 . ' ' . . . . . . . . . .. . . - . . • . - - .. : . , . , . I ,', :t 1 4 « - _ ,... , 1 -Ill"''." '-'1W L'ii"' • • ...e■de..-?....1 :ek.. ,'.!5*.•7:.." •',.....i.-'1"-gl:.---; IOW- VC* ‘"IlltAlilL In I --,,...--.--.. . -.7_". _, ....-.......g. .. ...,,... . - . • — , - RETAIL . ....,i-* .......-.«. 1 JL .– "'ME ... rum we .--- _. .,. • t -•-•._. -...-,. ...- .-_—...-- - - -IP - it'frVviri.i.- - - -„,30 Kor.elfrt... einearinb, is TP- _ — tb _ -■ .=- . ..''',... . ---J.. 'tr...--6-• •...... \ , y r-- -.. ----4-.--7----,--.,-..r.. 4101.114111:.::3‘_ — s .,. . s, N... • " Alt ....--s••":1 r LA...2 s.y.. :::::„....1,......: fl 1 I 1 ..----., ;::.1,)„, ; A■ .1) AS„,. my ... 411 .1t e -=--=-= e ..:'.,.1.,:-.... • ",,-,, ..,_-.C-_-,003 J : .1....7 -v.41.qh !. I 71:pg sac 17 Inal.3 If I . ..... a E. ....,.. .__ - . 31P :. r.■.., _ . T. i ,...T ... 4 . , c, Agd • '91Piir Ir. "Vil• , a ..... it. - E....3 Wir,froy KAI. z r4s. t - • -- , '•AIM . Os- _ MIP _,..... _ _„_...______ .. . — .• - RETAIL g : - .. v • aft 2occo cer . -- ..........a... . S.-- 41111P trio.,ror ID var-er.D rr 1: 41 ..-1: :t.....i I...I..5?•• ,f,7--7- 11,.11.61....miolt 45- d i • 'r'-""' .411111111.7 _ 1114111. .Amosseakessemptsaitaisaberrek, . -40011,■••1141h-A110412"1' -;: we , ..... , .. • I ( ■ • I Erma,Caws.CZO MAIN STREET ... il • . rum ST...err LAND COOP- . KOOS I.I.YAW 11.1l 5.1.X* - ,~41441r....i. ..----- ---- Porirt 0....M. 0.3.1 2324.4 j j . v.......0 Oa 11, =AL IluLCD4..•CA-VI.. 3rryft (190 ' t TWAL...pas.G.1,3 T...do Nisagg- . ..ffiiiiii-illrariNipit 11.-ite*- i . , .........-, - • .., .---z-1 ..-1-1-1-,-.pi-m-1- ,.•. e IE.., • -c•-,-- ..._______ _ CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN e 1 4cr t l_ I - E . I , - ,- ..,.; .9 7 . . . 1 ,... , , ........ _ . 1 tV ''' irl.,';41'/DP V,4,'-ti,?',i'V'Pfi.e`Alx,1.4.:itivii,,,'.ti.gi,4 i • . 4 •.;,,i, 1,.,•.,,v,,,,,..4.4.:,,,,,,,Alv,,..,,, ,4- , ,...„,,,,,„.....„,...,„...?„, Trti ‹.. 41,,,...,A,_,j ' t1 t,,' tt,,, 4,1,.I,4 7."'''1,1,4 .A. . ' a I .: • ' 1'n'n'* - '"TdEftfrtrrrrrrrrrrrm /* --.-1-4y,:.-immagrr-i-mmtimprx,rir- ' "'' ''''•'' • ''. i . 1111. nnnil ..,,,, . ,, 1 11 1, „1,...,,,,,..„..:)., . .,,.. a 'nil '.ii*. '''' < I g q —.I V CL R Wi :: 11 -1j1:1+ill A Alk . e . • 44 .. mu 1.......C4 8 t. , ,,,,„10111101111,10. ,.. a. fa. eL ''. I ., 11. - ....-4 ' is :..--• —i• lol'-0434i.:111:14:11EP 4 — . / ., 4‘40: ? — ,„, - :v, .... , 4.9,V,,,:,;) , , ,..• ' .,- • e . , •'•••-• ........ • 110if 0 a ff ' . . I . '- ai w < 12 1.44',. ‘a ..'°'''j■,, 41 -*'. II" . 1, V I Lt h:'14--"' . / .t •■• lib 80: I,. U. kit:;:.. iri t . i 9 P 5 , . ' ell 1. '', 0 Ak , . 1111" w. .--t Irt lin ' '''' L. .... ..i,I,C5‘. 1104 '... \'' '14'1") *,.., :.tii,' h.„ 41.\ ' "al 1 LuZ 0 LI:: . IP •N,13‘ I \ , ..0 1 ... , ' .. . , -It.. ..,.. h • V' III 0 CD 0 CD °- •• . . 1 ki, •ii 1, 1 p..t\ i ...* ' riu . , I t 1;11,14 , s. i An lit!),.. "e> 1 1 - . ... 5 i tl. ''. ' i ,i'ki, , v , < 1 _.,'I., ,, i II ,.. , -N .•, f•(,1: .,. : . i . 1 ,..., •a 3: iek 4/ ss 5 45s I.1 ‘.4.41'44* J 110‘14,‘ iii n n ‘''4 ' . , ,. I 1 tfr . it .. ... c.' .` -I* -- , *edgily , • 1' , f 11 • !. --„,'', .. f, t. 14* "11 ' .... .• #.0 < '., At . .,. . • it" IRtz i,- /RI. / ., .. i .., oi . I? •if • a.. a • n a -N . . ' ■ / 1 t" .1 r, Iii .p.1. ip lu lk • . . -, .,.. , At § .... .:'1 . .., • ,..4",', ',:' ;P l'' (47i*, '11 111 11, 111 Ili 1111i, , , I 0, ,,,,_,,,2„, *, ., * ,t,',7' "".,'to' ,I :''''' ' i l'n 1 1 1 1 4 4 % (6' 411°111 111 1 1 1 11 11 -• .; se., 440 . ' '433,, ' .1k. . . 3 . ? „.. • \--' %), 7 i • It iir,;. "/••• . . • 1 glitIliAglg gli ii . ..• ',..,,.\, , _% 441. .. ...-- . ,1/4..... • „.„ .,,,, \, . ,r,_ . , 1 .1,,, i All t.: . 1 I i:: •• a . C ‘, * 1:fre 'f' . • r . iiki , ,,, • 'e, 11111414.1 ii 1,1 hi ,I II, i 1 .1, it . , 4 ,..w,.. . 4 * u ... • '', c .!!'. . ..AI , ' 1111 ig Ilk; ill 111 iii 11 '411 III li l' ' ,.. i I h 1 h ,) 11; I , h , / -' .. , '■I''s, 411:0 Ak diL , A, 144. .1 V -4111'.411).d ../t- N ■.d. - . ; e1rFr SFr ..-121M - t, ‘49 .... .. . „ t F. ' I 1. ) - ...., I • , ,. . , , cr Is v ) -' i<C .) ki- . II il 8 0 1 4 !,01,. . .\ *. 14 1 ,.. . 44. . ... . 4 . _ . • lin 1 tt , illiffl j e Lti 0 1 [1 11 _ 1 ,1 t ..-. ,,,, _ 8 76 -a a 6 a 1.i. ., Ito • -Li 1 . war 1...., 1..... I,...,,, mem ...in.. }. , , ' " ] ra I '. I 1 ' - [6. 1 ti ii ' lii it, .. , I .,. JJWW W 1.1 II 1 .._ , „. 144444 . 1 '. :3.4 W Lou w w w LI II 1, P' i 1 i i , , r I 6 11' FCCECCIC fir .7.: l' , • 11 •'.:j.:' 111111fRi r 4 4•4 4.,•4 i 1 , • , • , I1 ititi ', Hi . ; Ei, -.. 1.r...ii..., — ....... ........ umasas ...... u.ems , .... • . ''S..'''........ S.:............ tIL,...., : < CC < < < < .r , . 1 4.4-.4., --.4 -1- i111111111- ... u ., , . • I 011 . . • , „........... ......._____ _ . .. .,. ...._.......... ....._ ..,. _ . . . . - - -i......______ ii-i - .,-- il:, ..... .. ........ ■ . '. .'" ,...7.7M .4_ ... * M V, V, V. • V, 1 . V• 41..r i I.„ 11 .11 li 1 1 4 ,1 • I . A.111,--110 51,411,4196",10/10,04:,1•INIIPIPqnftfge'1101111,110.,,trtftrION:f"",;.f,t4.1,411,401t.:1,-:,Thkfitglf1:11,',111111 1 '171.'1'1”.rt;" 1 ■ ''.3'4403Ag_ ' . .„ .' ," ' i..0,14i..:....40;.4,:,'''''.•-,,...0' A190:Yu.' ,,, “,„ ,,,,„„_, ,,,, . . , ,.. .,„..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,vpsv,214,0,031;cr,,,,:k,,,'1.-.,,-,.,,,,..t.., ,...,,.^..,4•LA,7. t , ' ' , '''r'" .. .•,r*''''."7"'"''''' ,, ' t ,,,' '...''',A,k 4,4',.''.,'-. 4,-.- ,.I',:TIp-44.'.4,11A0,1111V ,..,i '.0,A'• ,,,t,: qtayriv,,,,,I.A.;,,,,y.. ,,,,, ,,, .::,,,, ,,,,„„,:,,,,„ ,,ok ,,,,,,r ,,,,,,,,,,..,..:;,-...:..„.,%.,•'.-4i, '33.'.,'",-', :, ".'f.'-44.;2,,,';'1,i.',t'f,k-„,t,* Ve4"fte44,::s::0,trkps:4., ,Vit'64;0fXA:1114T rif .:.'x',J..0,i'ii 4.144'4.*,• 514'11-irO,14';4,411,,,,"p4.,4' '4.05'4141Kti:.'"'1,,f7':,' ,P;'' ,,,;::',,,,," . .."'''‘,,, '4414, „ ,Itte.:;44.01.44,-t:k.:'.:,14...1;5;:}IA;.';$,,evT,11.2,0*. ,‘4:Itt1'Yikf,if r _:,,,o,' 3 .pi.'. ''', i'',.,A,Vt„„, *I■,,,.,,.,, ,, l',..P,V., °.g," ■eZ tl.':1, " .,..41.•,;I,74.!,,,f4, ,,.,,r,,It ,1,4•,1',•111, 11+,•',,,7•41 0 r(.14 1' ' . , f ,- [ It. \-N. t f-----:-----".- -----1--i,..).- ----- -----'=---._ -----7 7- -;'?' ''7--- , t = f , : t( r j7.4. ---,..,,,_‘ ,..- N,.--..,,, __-----.......____________:\.:\\,\)_\ ,____..__,_-=_—_____T------=:- 1-77-77-_____:_-=i-: 1 . ' - t-------'../7----"" .."-----\_.__7'-.----,Th ( Z -''' ')1 t - I: . . - ----N- (\.\ ( i i 1 = 1 : , . : .1 : \\\I . \ . . i� I� t,/ ,/ --------,, 0 ) )) ' \ C-21. ' - -- " 1— \\ \ \ \ , 7 ,,./) ---7_,T .A.- . L----' 7--\ 1 : I , 1 ,,..„/ i :L_ .,_ _/rim �-\ �� \ 111 , k .,/7-\\, \ \_\\ \I\\ ----_-____--"-"_.- i /.17/ t,, 1 , . u .,. k. \,.., .. _ -.\,,,,.\\\\, / \;.___ , ,..---y,/ / , if,Ati\lilli N______. _v - / / /_/ /T 1 1 Ji i ii, '—,._ \ \ N\1111111.)ii,) i , 1 . --- ':: t j. , \)2\- .------N-YZ`N \ '' *------=:_j I/ qi'\ \ if ( OM t I i i . : f , \ -- ___ , 1 \ 1 ____ l ' • \ \ . L , 2///// / "‘\)\\1k11101(,, - k t , 1 \___ ---......._ . _ - i. ,.,-; i . . —, i , \ \ li it \\O. 6__„__ ,/,� / Ili I ## ! 1 " I ' h \-- yy. i I _ [ - : - (--- . --.-- t 1 1 ‘: [ _ i - , i \ f i 1 i . I: 1: , ' 7.1 ---1 —• [ 21 .---- -Y-y- i 4-1M ))111( ,,klY -- . ' 1, N -, \ ‘----1 . , .. , [ : - [. , 1 . .,7- 1. \ \ ill I ! _ >--_-___z, ----- / ///fv / ifiiiiiluoLv. 0 \ N . • - 1 t '-i ' )p_—___—__:-"---7--,----;\ [ It (' I i t,. ' ____,//7„,- -,--., il/1/01 Of 1-i , �_��J/ .___________--_____.t./,./,;f ! .F1{j`{{. C t f �1.. t re-; - ----- ._• ` It, I- t , lit. -____ ,------_______L------_______.----_---- --___„--________/,,- ff / , , /// , )/) -:1 4.,/fs' . I 1. L ‘ - \ • r-----,, - F [ t • . -,- . 1 Wit . iteis 5-.1=3.3 FA' EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC PLAN * 'rIT 'l: 1 MAID STREET00 4 -- =.....-- ia , - . - ....,- .. , . _ - - • . . _ . ,:.__ . .. . _.. _ . . . . • -_ T ., '1',',.';'-• •i1 q L .f' •■ .SW ASH SWEET I ^^••^^'771"' Af+ r�..ww.wr it ' F Ki ( . +r.7.. 7., "a' " ' �+ � , / 11 y . r / • t Y I / / 1 la • !` I I II 4ff jt t.�;a* 1la,J ,s'"-:M'� � I P ci 1 44.k 3 �? 0,,i\II I 3.t, q , I 1 , i t. .,!.''..5'.1:tYtii-j''':'' : .I''.';1:4,'...:‘.‘ti; 1 I • i/ I 0 1�.i, t • ' •:t4tp.� �•e°' irnL' • r+� ✓'�i//" ,..I 7 /,I I,�. ,,�' I ~tt,'.,,, t t } 1 ra l•'. ',-� , /f - }..J I t a / t \----,\.,„ ; � $ / , 1 ' / ( II t � : m1P t u ` ^,; I 'Il• ) ...) ,,t, , LI\ \14%.4:.,,,,,;:tni‘2,,,,,: ! t: ,.%,,,<,..,,.........A\ / • 1 '1(i'ic A•„.,/".; :::/‘'''''..:., :......' „ T.-"11.%.:::.f.F,77,".7.:7:.!::.::::::t..7."'HE:"....„:";:2:::::::::"0-%::::::- :„.... .**Z*.:,.:*:,7-r,A:-:::- U) is I (c. � ..� __c ". 1)1 1,1 ll 1 \\\,\ '`. N,1/4".,\ ' \\\,\. .,:..,,,:.:' ,„..:..5-•--(7:::::F,.. ...,_.:1_*: 7,...-:::::: ::7':,.."- ...---' ...,,,, ,,. - . ' )1 / ki .,4,,;:,Y.i,‘ \\ .\\\ ,,,'\'. . , . ///, 'r. // ��' Ar7I ma ' . t a, / ':/ ' 'I 'a \ 1 ' i.\ N.`,41. / � � t , -.,;ti � .. fr:/// r!' •,, `‘,4 '. \ . , , ' ' / i \ , \ . ‘. \\\N \ '.°, .• . , /,/ 4 '4,4t":;''4 '' I il ‘)\\ N' \ \\)\\ \1\) 1311 " ' •, I i / i I ) ) )) ) , rit‘ \ j • . ''', i ; ' . I . /, 1 .'''' ........--- -i. / ,:,,"••■,,,, ....---- ; i i ' ' t I ( ( ( ( ( e ( ( (1 0.14 5 ht . ,,, I. ., ...—.....-'-''''' '' 1 i I I 1 \ \ \ \\", ‘ 1 i i ; AIN , 51 \ r•rr' •.• 4, .••" '/I '' /al 1.-„i I ( y\.\\ \ \\ s, '' Nt.\'' '''''+-----.----'.."::-.--"------- ,----''y' — \\ ' '',2 ) ) \ ,..„,,, . ..\\\\11 A 5 „ •. ,:,„ . . i *„..--.„.„......------'' ..------ ..-----' ......•-- ) 1 i iA —/ --....— ) ,, te4,' ',. ''.it. ild ( r,, _ _ . , .,. , ,,, .. ....Y . \\ \ I......„ .,,, ,..,,........._•••_________________..,...- -r,,, . i , ,, \ \ _____ I p 0 1)11\ • ,i1, •'. tiA, . ) N s'' \ '.,,,,V;, ,J''' \ \ ? ) 1 /' ......,..-,-.1-',.,,---'1* • CI) ..„,,,'11 t, p...„_4 , ...1._. ..........-.* / ) ) )„ To.„ .,. , L...1 i / r _-■...:.. Ins, i i / \ ( // . ..., Pion, --I L 7-1 / ,. ,, Ari ?'f 1 -,....,...... m..., 2 . ., ., 1.....4., 1...1-- / 1.1 j e. ,,,,,,, .,. ., i i , ,, ....t. . .t, . , , ,,..„. ........_........,,,, / , .,.,., ,..........z, , / —........., ... . , . . ,. s.. , , . ,___. .......*Au,••••■• , 0. wis t ca Aul ).Vr V. 1 li' I'` t. {t I ■y” . . . . . .... ., ". .'.„ • , 1.•••■••■■•■,, r•AV.AIRALIA■■■A -- -- --.. — . . . .. . . . . , . . . . . . . ... •. . ti. ,. .. ..,- * . cl . ...,.,. , ,....„...4.4,._ .,,'.'..'::-'''' " " , . 4+,„:17,''''..?. '''''''''''-',;,.2' • ..,,,,,;;;:...:":-„ --. , ''.) -'. ,', '''''' - '".qi .„., - • . .. , ..,:,,C,...,,,,,■-, „..:"' l', ;'i • , • ,,,,,,,7 '','.e='-i rq ' ,,„, 1, . , f,''''',' ,,',.;41 / „„',.,„" , ,,'",',71 , .h .,, ,1 4* . ,,,,41,'. , •.,,,,.; • , ,,......,, LI Cityl, ''', .1,ft`'.} 1 I -.':• . '., .•!!....rt.p.,19......,•47rt,etz,,40.;..',.,, i , , art'OF irialti:) . .. ,,.. • .WASHING1ON.COUNTY OREGON . , . .. ,',;.1.•' :May .,23i' 1983 ,-' . , . . . . . . , . . . .,, . ,• , . ,,,, • . •. ',, :i'.f.•),,,.% t-,/,-..-• -. --f. ”..,. ',....', • .-, ‘,. .•,,,,,, „. At,.,..,. . , , ,. . ., , ..,L „,..'..,,..;.,,,.., . , ; 1 ,i.i.,':. ., ' ' '■*J.^''1'',,';','.i;. '".,',,..,.'`.,'' `,,?;1,,!,:;,.; '„',C T,'■..,4 , ,,,,-,,„4,,,,;,,,s,,z,t, . . 1,.?„„ .:.. ;tit\ •,,''t`,-,''',:-i.i,°.:-.'?';',;.!-,;:i.k.i.,ki`,1,,,r, ii.'-'•!'"It;f4',M1,','.,?''''','''''., ':'„ '',., . ,,„. ,, .',, : ,.. „ ..,::,,I;ii„ .',,. ',. ', ' ''''`..'',1'.,;:!,'•'.'*,ti' '..!",''. .''.I'.'.-. ( . ` ','I.: ''',i.,'. rt,IR,;..4i,,t1:,„.0 \t',.,,,,,,),`:::;',.,,,.;-4,?,,A'.-.4t4,..4 . i.'hnif Y.%,:••••,.,,;','11,''''-t,,:...4,•",,',r,.; ith1,1,,,,`,40t:to.r!;,,kt#,:,,I,' 3.1."';',..',":,":,,-,t,"':.',',',",1, ,',4:,-,. ,,t,,, ,, , ,' 0:,.11.-,,%;,,,41;,i; ,$1,,"4,.,-1',''!:',. ''''''',t'Y''PA.;.,',fr,,1024.'",p414..,1.1.4!q;ii,1,0',■.',4/?1,,''': f.;.;',..';-,.:,7.'fi k'il'rf,' '.''''i•:::•'''*'*.. L -•'' " ' '• '•-'• ':•••• —• • '', * ••l•••••-••••'• '.."•••:• -17' , : ,,,,!',V,'',,:,•_ ,f,•11..i.,'PLIist,,V,4,f',-",,r!,:',',.:,1,.! . ."-, ,."•;'-,' ,,-, . q t'i_t,Y.,..".,V;;!-;•i:!.-'=,;.. ", '-'..' ,'.1“7;:Nf'i;,;.:,'.A.141.sktin'A,*:,::=',,:.':24.-,, . ,',...'.*.i", '..,'.'.,:'-.:• . .'-. . ' ..4.74,,,i,,;..... ...,... ,,, ,„' . z4/44.4 ,1 ,...).‘ ',..,",••;i: , • ' • ■• . . ' • •:;..4 1,..,'.,'., .• • •- *.644.5":.•4(1&Otinlo*.lAVettue,- , • • f'+‘;,„ ' ' • • , '4 .: ,.,.' t. x ,,.. .,. .,,,,,,„.-,,,,. , . . ! POttlandqr"«.',97.241 - -:- ' . ' ' I, . • I . , .Dear Mr. Allison • . ,,,,' •,- .'.., ., ,,, • This 4.1 . •. .-- ., y.., ltttdrAtAA:...itaitiOnat ta4Our.letter. concerning drainage . ).,;.•-... ,,K....,-,.. ,,,.,'„ . , ..•',„..,,..,.',,,,,,;;,,,-,i.,-;;„,.).•,,:....,,,;,,,,,, .,..',.,..,,.:,",,v.;',?"11•3.,-;.•,,,,,,;,,',,,,,,-A,0-4.;;,•; .;,.-,-, ,..••, ' - , - , , ' '.„A\-11fr,,(.%,,i'',..■';,.. , , ,.,.,,,t ..,,f,. '"'""ti'.',.1.,ke,`.1 ‘ ,- f;:',41...itt:,:t?,!•,J:,,,,: „, , , . ' zroituAznell.faitte°,15trett;t D yelopmenr.ont0....ebtitting, properties le''. We'Illave. ;' ,' ,.t, .', 11..0' ....,' .4. ,i,, .:44; i ', • '',-,,,,,,014,, 4,, ., ,,,,,,p,.e t,,t5„,,,s"!.,:.1,..V V.”,',n,L1,1.,',014,,,,f„,,,I„..1..ii.4 v'f,4,..4.,,,,,,,,,, 4-, . ••',*.'if6,..4'',.,' qi',,-,''- i',..''.' 4,Y.I.I.,". ..,4*,,,I..: ,,,,,,,,4".,,4,, ii ,Q r,,,,„-, ,,,,,,-.1.1";,!..N,.i, , nopgctioo,e3x,04;ITApc,cix,f_,q:„ ,B;ite ..,!,dra.in#,geR,Lenis.,,:bn,...ttiw.,..project, howpmer.:4r;;- ;•4,..L,.:,,, ,: , : ,'17-14;',41%Vi\l'(:,i.'.144,0plif fte,',,,i.'; '111$*:'4',,,,..:F'Yt' ':: '::::'?',`,-:::'.",'•''' :',. -.". : " ..•',. ''':. ''' '' 1 ''4 'A:::*'*"-.'.':',.'''..' ii, gtef.:;ti'I'l; '..; "'41';"•,. ,..'''' ''.:. d."'i ee, d'r..!44/a'o•tlL."t.141.a**gkr `•:iftO.i.. 7.l-0'aMli l,t:.tii,,,■e..#...,„,,p!61,,..f.,Site DeeigfthReNief 'brainage ' . ti''*'",*;,-, , ''. ' ' ,,,,..',.7,,.--„,ir,1„,...A.,,",,,,,,ilk. tk,e,• , tio'44:4t,.•xi)•.Aficlt.)...1.,-.7,4.,.•-i,-14.7.11•4#,,,.,..,:.•••••,4 .•••-•-.1•„, ,,,•• L;'•. :-'''.'.• •• ,* , •:-,.•':fr,-.4?,'•04,,'•"‘.'•':!•' ,'` . , . • • 'isr'-...4.1"•-•r:,.•'t• ' 'i, . • •' 1 Olailii",.-N00,,,,,..,$*.,14,41:iiiii***110.Aiit$tViiiiii0::#464,:'6f, any,,perniitS for `}106:'.:''0orli; ,.;'`...:','■.f.,_:',..'!•,'31 ,,:.;J1-,,,C,,Ii.•,:i,‘ ,-.. ..i,ii';‘,:iv.,;•:.•,,i4,-,y,„•.„ '1;...., ]..*•.•'.''''.„• . ., , ,,..• . , -. ' a -3,-.!••,...1•-•-' ••: - • . . , . ;• ;',-.0.•,;. •••,i. ,• whadte,4,0,exximpps,,sit.ttgt3,., 441),,f4,ppl.s4.4„?,q4&•if,9.)::,,,44.tg. ,Design. ,e*0*.,Aw..,.0,.,,v,o.p.,wil..,1, 11 ' $1,11gia?P.N.A.4!;;11,01):::e:It'F,V.4",„ ,....'-'''." •!'''•••; '''•`r-• ''• *.,'•"• •.„;''f'.'*2•Y-ii!"-i.',S;''''.11.,'°‘ - •:1,it.t..'''.*', `}''' '' , be'',,iitititiedA'adi't,lintroutidiiig.?prOpertY;otsinee.' •Akt that titue,i;''..'"yoilt4itily 11 , . , TAah. to contact at'Citylialt.to-Make arrangements to review the , , . . ,.. ' . site drainage''plane« , . Sxneerely4 . , , * ,',„,*,•*. ''..,.:-;»;1..,". , ,,'',,,.,j , , ,..., ''...:' ' a:%;','',,',' ' . * '-*.... ',. '''',','..',''',...• '''',*.:',,',A'' • ',1,`::" ".,t . ..,';'*,,'''',*r .`,.'A t',". ',.'' ,7; . 1 • '.' ..i.''''• '.. .,. . , . ., . Ell "....beth-:A. Netton . , , .• AsaOdiate *Planner • .. • , . . , . , - . • EAN'idnij , . • . .. , , i• • '11 - , . . 1 , . . '', • ,•. ; ,'.•' . • • 1 '. 1 i • i ' '' - ' ' -" ' • • ' ' 1 1'6 6 8.W,A S H 1:,-a',E I o""X 2'3-3'01 tiGARb OFI-EGON 0/228 P-1-1;63-9--4i71 0,,. , . ,... , ., . 10CS"ilb t/AY • I 14 1\4 AY 71985 6445 N. E. Union Avenue Portland, Oregon 97211 GAR CM OF T1 •D May 16, 1983 PLANNING PEP r City of Tigard City Hall Tigard, Oregon Attention: Planning Department Gentlemen; 1 am the owner of 1 .81 acres designated as Tax Lot 1800 on which I have apartments called the Pacific Village. This property is served by McKenzie Street. Directly across from me on McKenzie Street is the Kings Choice Apartments. I am very concerned as to how the drainage from these properties will be taken care of when Mr. J . B. Bishop builds his shopping center which will be adjacent to my property. The Bishop property has always been a natural drainage for the Kings Choice Apartments, my apartments , and the surrounding area, including Lots 1703 and 1700. The parking lot water as well as the drainage from the roofs all drain into the Bishop property, and to my knowledge none of this surface water or drainage from the roofs of the different buildings drains into the sewer system, Will you please advise me what the plans are for handling this considerable amount of drainage water. Very truly yours, K. V. Allison , * • 14,.. • 6445 N. E. Union Avenue lAGPAC) Portland, Oregon 97211 01, May 16 , 1983 ' OC1 \\AG PO° . City of Tigard City Hall Tigard, Oregon . , • Attention: Planning Department . Gentlemen: I am the owner of 1 .81 acres designated as Taxj Lot 1800 on which I have apartments called the Pacific Village. This property is served by McKenzie Street. Directly across from me on McKenzie Street is the Kings Choice Apartments . I am very concerned as to how the drainage from these properties will be taken care of when Mr . J. B . Bishop builds his shopping center which will be adjacent to my property. The Bishop property has always been a natural drainage for the Kings Choice Apartments , my apartments , and the surrounding area, including Lots 1703 and 1700 . , The parking lot water as well as the drainage from the roofs all drain into the Bishop property, and to my knowledge none of this surface water or drainage from the , roofs of the different buildings drains into the sewer system. - Will you please advise me what the plans are for handling this considerable amount of drainage water. • Very truly yours , • K V I V.--e.r.Z.-4--eA1",..-Z.0.--'* V Allison ) Hri(j )! kk7/]. 1 li 0., " K f . A ) t 01 LI dikL( ' i1 ■ ' NV„„, ,,, - . \ ? 1 6 j V , 4 Finke, flex and Lotti and Kadley, Georgeier. Davis, Eugene L & Vivian Hans Christian ( '.2551 SW Main--gtreet ( 4550 SW Lombard ' . P.O. Box 23562 , figar4,,,,0-iegon 97223 ''.' Beaverton, Oregon 97005 d' Tigard, Oregon 97223 Hoffarber Properties Patterson, J. Allan McBath, Jerry R. & 12005 SW Hall Blvd & Dolores T. Anna Kristan Tigard, Oregon 97223 12700 SW Pacific 13115 SW Ash Drive . Tigard, Oregon 97223' Tigard, Oregon 97223 : Lumbermen' s of Oregon, Inc. Springer, Jerry C. Edin, Phillip R & Anita J.' 1300 Norton Bldg 7970 SW Northvale Way 13110 SW Ash Drive Seattle, Washington 98104 Portland, Oregon 97225 Tigard, Oregon 97223 .. Franciscan Fathers of Springer, Jerry C. Jungvirt, Mark Ivan & • . California 7970 SW Northvale Way Laura Ann By St Anthonys Church Portland, Oregon 97225 13120 SW Ash Drive 12675 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard, Oregon 97223 , Tigard, Oregon 97223 , Franciscan Fathers of Ore. Village Square Schmierer, Clarence By St Anthonys Church c/o Gospodinovic, Rose 13130 SW Ash Drive , 12675 SW Pacific Hwy 12770 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard, Oregon 97223 , ' Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 , Funk, James H. Allison, Kenneth V. Chrisman, Charles S. Jr. . c/o Bergmann, Floyd H. Lavelle D. & Elizabeth A. Marine M 6445 NE Union 13140 SW ASh Drive 1160 SW 90th Ave Portland, Oregon 97211 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - Funk, James H. Ganoe, L. M. Rush, Richard L. & c/o Bergmann, Floyd H. 13165 SW Ash Drive Penelope Marine M Tigard, Oregon 97223 13175 SW Ash Drive 11600 SW 90th Ave Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Spada, Fred McCoy, Marvin K Grimm, Walter M. & 1137 SE Union Ave 13155 SW Ash Dr Elmerie J. Portland, Oregon 97214 Tigard, Oregon 97223 9400 SW Hill Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 f Village Square Schmidt, Alfred & Elizabeth Richman, Gene N. & c/o Gospodinovic, Rose 13145 SW Ash DriVe Ella Lynne 12770 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard, Oregon 97223 13120 SW Ash Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 t Tate, Noah and Lydia A. Reiter, John U. & R. Diahe Beck, John L. & Martha E. ' c/o Kings Choice, Ltd 13135 SW Ash Drive 13140 SW Ash AVente ' 8y Butterdield Capital Corp Tigatd, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 ', . 1220 East Birch Street I Brea, California 92621 , Tate, Noah and Lydia A. jtilftqlitt' , Zora Ove80n, Keith C4 & Lynn E, i . c/o KihgS Choide, Ltd 13125 SW A ive 13160 SW ASh AV'enue I By Butterfield Capital Corp Tigar regon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 , 1220 East Birch Street Brea, California 92621 1 , . Finke, Alex and Lotti and Davis, Eugene L & Vivian Hans Christian 4550 SW Lombard P.O. Box 23562 ( g Tigard, Oregon 97223 Beaverton, Oregon 97005 � � Hoffarber Properties Patterson, J. Allan McBath, Jerry R. & 12005 SW Hall Blvd & Dolores T. Anna Kristan Tigard, Oregon 97223 12700 SW Pacific 13115 SW Ash Drive Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 G- ' Lumbermen' s of Oregon, Inc. Springe ,r°r"" ry ��"4 ry Edin, Phillip R & Anita J; 1300 Norton Bldg 7970 •,,,Nort w e ,,�Ta 13110 SW Ash Drive Seattle, Washington 98104 Po 1 d,+�,,,0fe ,ter 97225 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Franciscan Fathers of Springer, Jerry C. Jungvirt, Mark Ivan & California 7970 SW Northvale Way Laura Ann By St Anthonys Church Portland, Oregon 97225 13120 SW Ash Drive 12675 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Franciscan Fathers of Ore. Village Square Schmierer, Clarence - . By St Anthonys Church u/u Gospodinovic, Rose 13130 SW Ash Drive 12770 SW Pacific Hw 12675 SW Pacific Hwy 12770 Tigard, Oregon 97223 . ' Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 p 4 t Funk,, - s H. Allison, Kenneth V. Chrisman, Charles S. Jr. • • c/ berg akin; F .ey`c H. ,- Lavelle D. & Elizabeth A. 0 rine ' ,. ./" 6445 NE Union 13140 SW Ash Drive 1160 W, 9, t"�h Av Portland, Oregon 97211 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard; Ore9pri" 97223 . Funk, James H. Ganoe, L. M. Rush, Richald L. & c/o Bergmann, Floyd H. 13165 SW Ash Drive Penelope Marine M Tigard, Oregon 97223 13175 SW Ash Drive 11600 SW 90th Ave Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Spada, Fred McCoy, Marvin K Grimm, Walter M. & 1137 SE Union Ave 13155 SW Ash Dr Elmerie J. Portland, Oregon 97214 Tigard, Oregon 97223 9400 SW Hill Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 a g e Square Schm idt, Alf. red & Elizabeth Richma n, Cease N. &Co s p odinovac, Rose 13145 SW Ash Drive Ella Lynne 12770 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 g Street 13120 SW Ash Tigard, Oregon 97223 i ate1 ,Noah C Lydia e A. 13135 John J. 2. Mane IC�.n s a � & Martha E, Beck John L t PBX a .t - '"1",� 1314 0 SW Ash Avenue ", �r SW ASh Drive By e b d to p. . a:!: otp Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 122('last Birch Street Brea, Cali ornia 92621 Tate Y Noah nd Lydia A. B � h Oi eson, Kea.th C Lynn B . c/o K � 13160 r� � � ingS Choice, Ltd B�. ` Butterfield P a,• Ti .,arcs .. O egon 9722 60 SW As Av � � Capital�.tal Gory � 97223 1 '4' .220 Bast Birch Street . . , , . . . Barnes, Terry N. & Gayle L. J.A. Atwoo0:139,9x,p0.›tion 7: 13215 SW Hill Ct . Tigard, Oregon 97223 C ,P,'51,p9pelon 4 .,, . . . . Herberholz, Albert J. & Marci D. Pacific Frontier Wood •, 13235 SW Hill Ct Markets ' Tigard, Oregon 97223 9500 SW Barbur Blvd #300 , Portland, Oregon 97219 ' . Pruitt, Arthur J. & Mary E. The Robert Randall Company , . . . ' c/o Klinkenberg, Edward C. 9500 SW Barbur Blvd & Louise F. Portland, Oregon 97219 '4 13240 SW Village Glen Dr: Tigard, Oregon 97223 1 U ,■ Gott, Daniel R. & Njane M. yi . , 13230 SW Hill Ct 7223 Tigard, Oregon 9 ... i:..`.-4! . • ''l . . Stark, Ronald F. hipb , 9340 SW Hill Street it- I ,, I . Tigard, Oregon 97223 •N, ..,. Johnson, Paul E. & Mildred Stevens, Page N. 9300 SW Hill Street 9180 SW Burnham Road Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 •. • Pindeil, Robert G. & Sharon L. Dolan, John T. 13235 SW Burnham Ct 4025 SE Brooklyn . Tigard, Oregon 97223 Portland, Oregon 97202 • Poertner, Henry R. & Sorg, Otto Barbara J. By City of Tigard 13245 SW Burnham Court P.O. Box 23397 • Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 ' 1 SaUb, Clarence R. & Lucy A Oulleyi John R. & Lois 1. 13230 SW Burnham Court 14095 SW Hargis Road . Tigard, Oregon 97223 BeaVertonp Oregon 97005 . ' •f Anderson, Harvey R. Hetvelhorst, midhael J, • 640 SW tiroadway c/o Kadey, George S. Jr. Portland, Oregon 97205 12551 SW Main Street • Tigard, Oregon 97223 . ' J.A. Atwood Corporation jungvirt, zora 33 SW Third Avenue 13125 Ash Drive Portland, Oregon 91204 Tigard; Oregon 97223 . .4, ' Barnes, Terry N. & Gayle J.A. Atwood Corporation Crow, Carol 4,-Trustee ,• 132,35 SW Hill Ct (( 33 SW 3rd ( By 7:53:::gard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Portland, Oregon 97204 ' P.O. Bo 3397 Tigar , Ore n 97223 Herberholz, Albert J. & Marci D. Pacific Frontier Wood 13235 SW Hill Ct Markets Tigard, Oregon 97223 9500 SW Barbur Blvd #300 Portland, Oregon 97219 T Pruitt,' Arthur J. & Mary E. he Robert Randall Company c/o Klinkenberg, Edward C. 9500 SW Barbur Blvd & Louise F. Portland, Oregon 97219 13240 SW Village Glen Dr. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Gott, Daniel R. & Njane M. ' of :gard 13230 SW Hill Ct P.O. 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tiga • , Oregon 97223 Stark, Ronald F. ei- of T'.gard 9340 SW Hill Street P.O. 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 12420 am Tig d, Oregon 97223 • Johnson, Paul E. & Mildred Stevens, Page N. 9300 SW Hill Street 9180 SW Burnham Road Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Pindell, Robert G. & Sharon L. Dolan, John T. 13235 SW Burnham Ct 4025 SE Brooklyn , Tigard, Oregon 97223 Portland, Oregon 97202 Poertner, Henry R. & Sorg, Otto Barbara J. By City of Tigard 13245 SW Burnham Court P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Saub, Clarence R. & LucY A Gulley, John R. & Lois I. 13230 SW Burnham Court 14095 SW Hargis Road Tigard, Oregon 97223 Beaverton, Oregon 97005 Anderson, Harvey R. HeUvelhorst, Michael J. 610 SW Broadway c/o Kadey, George S. Jr. Portland, Oregon 97205 12551 SW Main Street Tigard, Oregon 91223 a.A. Atwood corporation Jungvirt, Zora • 33 SW Third Avento 13125 A8h Drive POrtland, Oregon 97204 Tigard, Oregon 97223 r, , . , . 1 . . .,..., . , r.mr 0.04 44 "lit 1 . "" '",;, u r-iii • EADON 13645 SW Steven Ct. Tigard, Oregon 97223 w"-N .., ,. . ) Jeanne Caswell Chamber of Commerce I 40:41. 1,I4k4i , 12995 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, Oregon 97223 ;! ' . 1 • JB Bishop Gave JB copies for Costco, Suite 303 10505 SW Barbur B.vd & Engineer Portland, Oregon 97219 • (4C4144 Gloria Johnson t 9300 Hill Street , 4 Tigard, Oregon 97223 ,t Ali 4 Akt 4, A , Z t Emmet Whitaker .„ 13250 SW tunham Ct. • .. Tigard, Oregon 97223 • . '' 2 „....,• • .1.1 zoll • • . • ,,,,,, it ' "..,,. ,. • ,,,,,, VA ' ...„ J. L. Gehron 13215 SW Ash Dr. • „4,1 Tigard, Oregon Gott 4. ” 13230 SW Hill Ct. „.111.. .. Tigard, Oregon 97223 eei .,.,,5 1 ob. • Graham 13290 SW Ash Dr. `-, 4 0,4 ,f . - Tigard, Oregon 97223 • , k . a . , 1, I 44 •( . �� 4 ,1: Gloria Johnson f�. t� ,� ` 9300 SW Hill St 0"( Tigard, Oregon 97223 ► ,.',,. eat. �r 9" ,,, 4.0• Carolyn Eadon «;ern 13645 SW Steven Ct. '"�". ` �� +, p Tigard, Oregon 97223' �� '��'gip: 1�'' "t cad' "'. r Jeff I s, f Graham Emmet Whitaker ,.(1.:,...,,,,,,,, . 13290 SW Ash Drive 13250 SW Burnham ., +,,.: �1 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 02� e��,r► ■.�0. ,I Jeanne Caswell J. L. Gehron Chamber of Commerce 13215 SW Ash Drive # ' 12995 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon 97223 1 HO Tigard, Oregon 97223 N , f .j>i . 4., AAANNN!!! �� (t, J Gott c , I��'`, i 13230 SW Hill Ct. r ''a. - i''.7 +b' Tigard, Oregon 97223 1 1 . (5,/;;;;") : 1):21) il° 11,',..d):Al '/'''' Th',.)0 14'6' litt.„4„; �•` '.✓ ,,G:,a t,�?r r w» � i.w e vio* *%'1 ��.ld4Cl c%PUtW.EIiY,� rpf.'. r ? i3#xd, S4�f :Y, r•5stow+ r 1 �c„ ��k 0i* r {rt4U40414 .,-.6.11 i 0 '��.. + �' .` + "� i Anita Edin .�'� ,. 1 a �` 13110 SW Ash Drive :4-! !`v,, ,,),,,4,1.F, , i f •h 3�, t+k+tliy '. w+�1 �q� w� +'w' � - kr .`° Tigard, OR 2 1F F.r},. ”d' ♦ :, , �'A4^ . i., 9723f ! 1 10 r 1w^fM`` f ' cs,S r, . 1/45 qii JB Bishop „”` i �`'' Suite 303 10505 SW Barbur Blvd 4 ° �, 0 ° 1, Portland) Oregon 97219 ; v '""'� `+ ` , i kW p„ )1 ,t, A, Gary Ott NPC7 ��1 tihair�iiait 4"4.1.2.1",.;'0*,." ,,.. ., ,,,,N,,..4, SW a ow .• . 055 W Edge'wood g ( 223 ,, 7 11,,,,'-` _ .. e 4h,•"sue.ly.-1..1k°x:ECro riew l:1. ,.1r h" t,..,. ut:u CITY OF TIGARD , 47 Washington County, Oregon ) NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION -w BY CITY COUNCIL (Sec, 18,32,300) i 1. Concerning Case Number(s): PD 1--85 ZC 5-85 w� 2, Name of Owner: J B Bishop/Main Street Land Corp. } 3, Name of Applicant: Game Address 10505 SW Barbur Blvd. S 303 City Portland State OR Zip 97219 • 4, Location of Property: Address Southeast side of Ash St. south side of Fanno Creek, East of Main Legal Description 251 2AC lots 1200, 1300, 1400, 1500, 1600, 2200, 2300, 2301, &.201; } 2S1 2DB lot 300 5, Nature of Application: Conceptual plan approval of a 221,000 sq. ft. retail . � center on a 20.3 acre parse •; an. or a Zone C• ange rom (Rexidential, 12 units/acre) to CBD (Central Business 'District) fora 3. 19 acre parcel. 6, Action: The Tigard City Council voted unanimously to approve the requests with conditions and modifications from the Planning Commission recommendations. Ordinance No 85-23, which sets out the findings and conditions, is available at Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash Avenue, Tigard, OR 97223. 7, Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed tot XX . The applicant & owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX' . The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected governmental agencies ' (r 0, Final Decision:, THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL oN M ... The adopted findings cf fact, decision, and statement of co ndition can be obtained from the Planning bepartment, rigard City Nall, 12755 SW Ash, Pb, , box / 397, Tigard, Oregon 97220, 9, uestions! If you have any gUestions, please call the City of Tigard City Recorder, 639-4171, (02670) T•' J . • .._ .. s rrve+;1F.,,,s .i4 ..'ry.i..., .•.. .. .f.A;....w,,. •.•n ry.i I r'. CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon ;. y NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - BY PLANNING COMMISSION 1. Concerning Case Number(s): PD 1-85 ZC 5-85 R I 2. Name of Owner: Main Street Land Corp. 3. Name of Applicant: Main Street Land Corp. Address Suite 303, 10505 SW Barbur City Portland Stare OR Zip 97219 4. Location of Property: Address Southwest corner of Main Street and Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 2CC Lots 1200, 1300, 1400, 1500, 1 00, 2200, 'MO, 11, I an. 1 2DB, lot 300 Tax Map and Lot No(s)., see above 5. Nature of Application: For Conceptual. Plan approval for a 221 ,000 sq. ft. retail center on 20.3 acre property and for a .,one ange rom .r 'esi•en ial, 12-17TEF7=7 to to entra usiness District or a 3779 acre parceoan i —Fife S out east sl e o $ 5tzc'et. 6. Action: Approval as requested XX Approval with conditions Denial 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and , mailed to: XX The applicant & owners I Owners of record within the required distance , xx The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected governmental agencies 8. Final Decision: . THE DECISION SHALL RE FINAL ON April 15, 1985 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of condition can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. ly 9. Appeal: 1 •_ Any party to the decision Way appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. 1 The deadline for filing of an appeal is 5:00 PM 4-15-85 10. • QUestions: If yOU have any guestions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, 639'4171. (0257P0 rcuLL-LuN►.xuL 2S12AB. 01902 PCA: 3012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 135,600 AD VALOREM 11,344.87 1, KEYS 00461280= CIL:5229 LOC:9380 TIGARD ST SW JV:33832 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 440,000 NET TAX 11,344.87 lint UTZ: AREA:Y-2 ROLL SED: 60601 *ASSESSED 575,600 3% DISCOUNT 340.35 ATLAS LAND COMPANY 12 39377 1 001- ITS 12 39377 1 001 TAXABLE 552,600 CURRENT TAX 11,004.52 9380 SW' TIGARD N TTGARDVILLE ADD 2..49AC TIGARD OR 97223= D 9380 Si TIGARD ST ZONE = M-4 SALE 0000 08880233 25:12AB: 02000 PCA: 2012. DIST: 023-74 D LAND 69,000 AD VALOREM 2,533.41 t � KE : 00461299 CTL: LOC:12535 MAIN SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 59,500 NET TAX 2,533.41 % i UT1= UTZ AREA:ZTC ROLL SEQ: 60602 *ASSESSED 128,500 3X DISCOUNT 76.00 t- EINXE,, ALEX AND LOTTI. AND .32AC *************************** TAXABLE 123,400 CURRENT TAX 2,457.41 HANS CHRISTIAN CO 39984 7/11/84 CODE CHANGE 23-20 TO 23-74 *** DELINQUENT TAXES *** PO= BOX 23562 CO 35399 6/14/82. CODE CHANGE 23-74 TO 23-20 1 TIGARD OR 97223 o OE E Q'L1 i8_ a / 2 SALE 0180 80003504 1 uD M 2512AB 02100 PCA: 2002 DIST: 023-74 23 74 LAND 26,500 AD VALOREM 521.47 KEY: 0046/306 CTL: LOC: JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR *ASSESSED 26,500 NET TAX 521.47 UTI: UTZ: AREA:ZTC ROLL SEQ: 60603 TAXABLE 25,400 3% DISCOUNT 15.64 FINKE, ALEX AND LOTTI: AND *************************** CO 39984 7/11/84 CURRENT TAX 505.83 !`'TANS CHRI STIAN` CODE CHANGE 23-20 TO 23-74 CO 35399 6/14182 0 BOX` 23562. CODE CHANGE, 23-74 TO 23-20 B OF E 0185 81/82. TIGARD OR 97223 SALE 0180 80003504 V WD N 1 2512AB 02200 PCA: 2012 'DIST:-023=74 D 23 74 -' LAND 12,600 AD VALOREM 921.78 I KEY: 0046/315 CTL: LOC:12525 MAIN SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 34,200 NET TAX 921.78 UT1=: UTZ: AREA:ZTC ROLL. SEQ: 60604 *ASSESSED 46,800 3% DISCOUNT 27.65 CACH GERALD C JOAN L *************************** CO 39984 7/11/84 TAXABLE 44,900 CURRENT TAX 894.13 15170 S SUNRISE IN CODE CHANGE 23-20. TO 23-74 CO 35399 6/14/82 1 TIGARD OR. 97223 CODE CHANGE 23-74 TO 23-20 SALE 0000 11660132 , ` 2S12AB- 02300 PCA: 2012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 11,800 AD VALOREM 917.69 KEY`. 00461324 CTL: LOC:12519 MAIN SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 34,800 NET TAX 917.69 ! _ UTI: UT2:: AREA:ZTC ROLL SEQ: 60605. *ASSESSED - 46,600 3% DISCOUNT 27.53 HANSON, DONALD E SHIRLEY PT LOT 15 ELEC: ADD TO TIGARD TAXABLE 44,700 CURRENT TAX 890.16 PO` BOX 12 SALE 0000 11730920 WEMME OR 97067 2S1-2AB. 02400 PCA: 2012 DIST: 023-74 23 74 LAND 28,600 AD VALOREM 956.69 KEY:: 00461333 CTL: LOC: - JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 19;900 NET TAX 956.69 UTI: UTZ:' AREA:ZTC ROLL SEQ: 60606 *ASSESSED 48,500 3% DISCOUNT 28.70 ;' HANSON DONALD E SHIRLEY FT LOT 15 ELEC ADD TO TIGARD TAXABLE 46,600 CURRENT IAX 927.99 t .-R-PO BOX 12 SALE 0000 11730920 EMME OR 97067 2512AB 0240 1 PCA: 2012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 9,700 AD VALOREM 726.77 KEY:. 00461342: CTL: LOC:12511 MAIN SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD°VAL. 27,200 NET TAX 726.77 OT1: UTZ: AREA:ZTC ROLL SEQ: 60607 *ASSESSED 36,900 3% DISCOUNT 21.80 - HANSON,. DONALD E D 12511 SW MAIN ************t****t**t****** TAXABLE 35,400 CURRENT TAX 704.97 SHIRLEY CO 39984 7/11/84 CODE CHANGE 23-20 TO 23-74 PO BOX 12 CO 35399 6/14/82_ CODE CHANGE 23-74 TO 23-20 WEMME OR 97067 SALE 0000 09990485 2512AB 02:402 PCA: 2012. DIST':- 023-74 23 74 LAND 45,600 AD VALOREM 2,024.25 KEY: 00461351 CTL.: LOC: JV:32053 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 57,100 NET TAX 2,024.25 UTI: UT2: AREA:ZTC ROLL 5E0: 60608 *ASSESSED 102,700 3% DISCOUNT 60.73 JANOE, C E CHARLOTTE 14AC PT LOT 15 ELEC. ADD TO TIGARD TAXABLE 98,600 CURRENI TAX 1,963.52 X= BURTON,. V H AA SALE 0000 09290581 , BERTULEIT,- D M R. P` 0 BOX 23338= TIGARD• OR 97223 r - T IGARD OR 9 t225> _ PCA: ZG12 DiST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 33,200 AD VALOREM 1,108.62 CTL LOC:12500 MAIN SW JV:00000 NEAP: MOQPR BLD-VAL 23,000 NET TAX 1,108.62. UT1.: UTZ: AREA:LTC ROLL SEQ: 60652 *ASSESSED 56,200 3% DISCOUNT 33.26 VERIR'_LYE, HOBART P JEAN .15AC 12500 SW MAIN TAXABLE 54.000 CURRENT TAX 1,075.36 11272 SW CAPITOL HWlY PORTLAND OR 9721.9 2S I2AC 00700 PCA: 2012 DIST 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 167,500 AD VALOREM 5,165.34 KEY: 00461734 CTL: LOC:12520 MAIN SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 94,600 NET TAX 5,165.34 i UT1: UTZ: AREA:ZTC ROLL SEQ: 60653 *ASSESSED 262,100 3% DISCOUNT 154.96 DOLAN,: JOHN' T 1..67AC= 12520 Std MAIN TAXABLE 251,600 CURRENT TAX 5,010.38 4025 SE BROOKLYN SALE 0582 82011414 1 WD L PORTLAND OR 97202 - 2S12AC: 00800 PCA: 20.12 DIST: 023-74 D LAND 48,200 AD VALOREM 3,888.39 KEY 00461743 CTL: LOC:12551 MAIN SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 149,100 NET TAX 3,888.39 U11 UT2:: AREA:Z-TC ROLL SEQ: 60654 *ASSESSED 197,300 3X DISCOUNT 116.65 HEUVELHORST,; MICHAEL J .23AC 12551 1 12555 SW MAIN TAXABLE 189,400 CURRENT TAX 3,771.74 x KADE,Y,.. GEORGE 5 JR. SALE 0281 81005234 I" CT a *** DELINQUENT TAXES *** r-_'2551 SW MAIN ST ::CARD OR 97223 2.512AC 00900 PCA:; 2012 DI:ST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 36,600 AD VALOREM 1,738.89 KEY: 00461752 CTL LOC:,12571 MAIN - _ .. SW_._JV:00000____-MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 51,600 NET TAX 1,738.89 UT1 UT2: AREA.ZTC ROLL SEQ: 60655 *ASSESSED i 88,200`3X DISCOUNT - 52.17 ! DAVIS. EUGENE L VIVIAN =12AC 12571 SW MAIN TAXABLE 84,700 CURRENT TAX 1,686.72 1 - p -550: SU LOMBARD SALE 0000 08030852 BEAVERTON. OR 97005 2S12AC 01000 PCA: 2012 DIST: 023-74- D 23 74 LAND 24,000 AD VALOREM 743.17 I° - KEY: 00461761 CTL: LOC:12575 MAIN SW JV:00000 MAP:. 00008 BLD-VAL 13,700 NET TAX- 743.17 UT1r UT2 AREA:ZTC ROLL SEQ: 60656 *ASSESSED 37.700 3% DISCOUNT 22-.30 LkHOFFARBER: PROPERTIES .03AC *************************** TAXABLE 36,200 CURRENT TAX 720.87 = 12005 SW HALL, BLVD CO 39984 7/11/84 CODE CHANGE 23-20 TO 23-74 - TIGARD OR 97223 HOFFARBER PROPERTIES 1/84 - 84001931 CO 35399 6/14/82 CODE CHANGE 23-74 TO 23-20 **-**-*tr*fr sm'fke**k**-** :-**km**r**-t**xrc******;:*t*************4-*********t******$******************************************** 51 300 MARKET - 5546 251 - 00 'LAND - 1895;668-500 -BLD - - 3650-582 800 -SP-FEAT -'.£ MARKET 5.546.2 , ,� ---- --- -- BASE-01_ 5314110200..00- BASE-02 350Z1G-'00 BASE-03 2.92079.00 BASE-04 53535.00 BASE-05 197993.00 BASE-06 595455.00 BASE-07 :.00 BASE-08 .00 BASE-09 .00 BASE-10 .00 0 VALOREM 118,142,323.30 STATE PAID 5,918,875.47 SPEC ASSMT 5,597,901.95 NET TAX 117,821,349.78 3% DISCOUNT 3,534,644.61 =URRENT TAX114,286.705.17 ROLL.: PARCEL. NUMBER ORDER W A S H I N G T O N COUNTY PROPERTY VALUES FOR. 1984-85 REAL PROPERTY 10/16/84 PAGE 4403 ROLL-CONTROL 2S12AC:. 0.1100 PCA: 2012 DIST: 023-74 D LAND 45,900 AD VALOREM 2,894.73 KEY: 00461770 CTL: LOC 12566. MAIN SW JV.00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL. 101,000 NET TAX' 2,,894.73 wr . YtT1� AnCA. T 01110___-_cCn_. _�_ CAGC7_- - -- - -...ACCeCCert ___1-lL_ nn-7_V" �tcPAIWIT 04 F. ROLL-CONTROL 2St2aA 01100 PCA 1012 DIST: 023-74 D A3 LAND 28,600 *TIGRDELSW 24.24 KE1 : 00462467 CIL: LOC:12220 GRANT AVE SW JV:,00000 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 41,500 AD VALOREM 1,381.68 UT1: UTZ: 24.24 AREA:KL47 ROLL SEQ: 60726 *ASSESSED 70,100 SPEC ASSMT 24.24 STRACHAN, M JOANNE AND .64AC SALE 0482 82012966 I WD F TAXABLE 67,300 NET TAX 1,405.92 JOSEPH R. UT2 24.24 3% DISCOUNT 42.18 PO BOX 3956 CURRENT TAX 1,363.74 i INCLINE VILLAGE NV 89450 *** DELINQUENT TAXES 2S12BA. 01190: PCA: 1002 DIST: 023-74 23 74 LAND 1,600 AD VALOREM 30.83 KEY: 00462476 CTL: LOC: J11:29669 MAP: NOOPR *ASSESSED 1.600 NET TAX 30.83 UT1:- UTZ: AREA:KL47 ROLL SEQ: 60727 TAXABLE 1,500 3% DISCOUNT .92 ELKINS.. ALVIN ..16AC ZONE = M-4 CURRENT TAX 29.91 454 BIRCHWOOD LANE SALE 0000 08740016 ILLSBORO OR 97123 2SI2BA 01-.200 PCA: 2012 DIST: 023-74 D LAND 351,100 AD VALOREM 13,672.98 KEY: 00462485 CTL: LOC:12585 PACIFIC SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 342.,600 NET TAX 13,672.98 UT1': UTZ:: AREA:ZPHY ROLL SEQ: 60728 *ASSESSED 693,700 3X DISCOUNT 410.19 l_UNBERIEN-'S OF OREGON INC 3.10AC D 12585-12595 SW PACIFIC TAXABLE 666,000 CURRENT TAX 13,262.79 1300 NORTON BLDG SALE. 0183 83003844 1 WD M SEATTLE WA 98104" 2512BA- 01300 . - PCA: 2012- ----DIST: -023-74 D - - --- - , --LAND- = 22,700 AD VALOREM ,...,.,,.447_.57- - KEG: 00462494 CTL: L.00:9665 JOHNSON ST SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR_ *ASSESSED 22,700 NET TAX 447.57 UT1t :ZPHY" ROLL SEQ: 60729 TAXABLE 21,800 3% DISCOUNT 13.43 UTZ: aREA. . LUMBERMEN'S OF OREGON" INC .ZOAC ZONE. = C-3 CURRENT TAX 434.14 1300 NORTON BLDG SALE 0183 83003844 1 WD M SEATTLE WA 98104 2S128A 01400 PCA:° 7012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 13 7000 AD VALOREM 18,212.19 KEY: 00462500 CTL: LOC:9685 JOHNSON SW JV:00000 MAP: 00012 BLD-VAL 787.100 NET TAX 18,212.19 UT1 UTZ: AREA:X-2 ROLL. SEQ: 60730 _ *ASSESSED 924,100 3X DISCOUNT 546.37 SHLIMP NATHAN AND SYLVIA L LOT 54 *************************** TAXABLE 887,100 CURRENT TAX 17,665.82. 1 TRUSTEES SHUN, NATHAN AND SYLVIA L TRUSTEES 2901 NW' QUIMBY' 5/84 84019996 SALE 0183 83004890 I CT U PORTLAND OR 97201 2 2BA 01500_-----~� PCA: 1012 DIST::: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 27,500 AD VALOREM 1,233.88 KEY':. 00462519 CTL LOC:#2348' GRANT ST SW JV:17907 .MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 35,100 NET TAX 1,233.88 UT1: UTZ: AREA:KL47' ROLL. SEQ: 60731. *ASSESSED 62,600 3X DISCOUNT 37.02 P ,MCCRACKEN,: RAY` ESTATE OF .28AC D 12348-12350 SW GRANT ST TAXABLE 60,100 CURRENT TAX 1.196.86 --% MALONEY GREGORY R. AND ZONE = A-2 SALE 0978 79033092 1. CT 0 *** DELINQUENT TAXES *** 'SHARON: I ` 16740 SW 1 4711i TIGARD OR 97223 . 2S12BA 01501 PCA: 7002 DIST: 023-74 23 74 LAND 11,500 AD VALOREM 225.83 KEY: 00462528 CTL: LOC: JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR *ASSESSED 11,500 NET TAX 225.83 UT1: UTZ: AREA:X-2 ROLL SEQ: 60732 TAXABLE 11,000 3% DISCOUNT 6.77 `" ERICKSON,. EDWARD J DIANE 78AC ZONE _- A-2 CURRENT TAX 219.06 a SW ABELARD SALE 0000 07880138 LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 R 2S12BA- 01502 PCA: 1012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 19,800 AD VALOREM 897.16 KEY: 00462537 CTL:4037 LOC12330 GRANT ST SW JV:33091 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 25,700 NET TAX 897.16 UT1:: UTZ: AREA:KL47 ROLL SEQ.: 60733 *ASSESSED 45,500 3X DISCOUNT 26.91 FREDRICKS, CLAUDIA H+ LOT PT 13 BLOCK N TIGARD ADD TAXABLE 43,700 CURRENT TAX 870.25 PO BOX 23714 _10 AC D 12330 SW GRANT ST TIGARD OR 97223 ZONE = A-2 SALE 0680 80021542 I WD Q. 2ST2BA 01505 PCA: 1002 DIST:: 023-74 D LAND 100 AD VALOREM 2.08 - - - - ♦ , POLLOCK, DONALD E AND JULIA. LOT 15 YOLO ESTATES ZONE = R-7 CURRENT TAR 96.60 1021:1 SW BARBUR- BLVD SALE 0879 PLAT4735 *** DELINQUENT TAXES *** PORTLAND OR 97219= 2S 12BC 06700 PCA: 9152 DIST: 023-74 *ASSESSED 0 KEY: 01127284 CTL: LOC: JV:31278 MAP: NOOPR. UTT= UT2: AREA: ROLL SEQ.: 6091.9° TIGARD,, CITY OF TRACT A 2.325 ACRES ZONE = R-7 YOLO ESTATES PO BOX 2339T SALE 0879 PLAT4735 TIGARD OR 97223 2S12BD 00=100: PCA: 9602 DIST: 023-74 D: 23 74 *ASSESSED 0 KEY:. 0046.4152 CTL: LOC:12645 PACIFIC HWY Su JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR 43 UTT: UTZ AREA_: 00 ROLL SEQ:= 60920 FRANCISCAN FATHERS OF CALIF 1.32AC NON-ASSESSABLE -__ BY ST ANTHONYS CHURCH ZONE = C-3 SALE 0000 00890305 12675 Sit PACIFIC HWY TIGARD; OR 97223 2ST2BD 00200 PCA: 9602 DIST: 023-74- 23 74 *-ASSESSED 0 KEY": 00464170 CTL: LOC: JV•00000 MAP - NOOPR = • 1TT: K2: AREAS 00 ROLL SEQ: 60921 • ARCHDIOCESE OF PORTLAND NON-ASSESSABLE PORTION 2.86AC p' f= ST ANTHONY'S CHURCH SALE 0000 02590723 12675 SU PACIFIC HWY TIGARD OR 97223 2S12BD- 00200- 00: 01 PCA: 1002. DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 19,800 AD VALOREM 390.07 KEY: 00464161: CTL: LOC::9835 MC KENZIE ST SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR *ASSESSED 1.9,800 NET TAX 390.07 UT1:; - UT2 AREA:KL47 ROLL SEQ: 60922 TAXABLE 19,000 3X DISCOUNT 11.70 ARCHDIOCESE OF PORTLAND .34AC ASSESSABLE PORTION *************************** CURRENT TAX 378.37 ST- ANTHONY'S CHURCH CO 22630 12/22/83 CORRECTION 9905 SW` MC KENZIE ST CO 82-22630 11-09-82 LESS .2OAC TO STREET TIGARD OR 97223 SALE 0000 02590723 -- - 2S12BD 00201 - - - PCA 9602 -- DIST: 023-74 - -_ -_ *ASSESSED 0 KEY 11.1279976 CTL. LOC: JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR .__ ._ UT1:: UT2:: AREA: 00 ROLL SEQ:. 60923 /,- „THE° ARCHDIOCESE OF PORTLAND .96AC NON-ASSESSABLE �} sinr ST ANTHONY'S. CHURCH NORTH TIGARDi/ILLE AMENDED PT LOTS 46-51 12675 SW PACIFIC HWY- SALE 1.1.82 82031261 V QC H TIGARD OR 97223 2512BD 00300= PCA.: 9602 DIST:: 023-74 D 23 74 *ASSESSED 0 KEY 00464189 CTL:: LOC:12675- PACIFIC HWY SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR - *7UTT: UT2: AREA:, 00 ROLL SEQ: 60924- . FRANCISCAN: FATHERS OF ORE_ GO 1-15AC: NON-ASSESSABLE BY ST ANTHONYS, CHURCH - SALE 0000 03290022 12675 SW° PACIFIC HUY TIGARD OR 97223 25128D: 00400 PCA: 9602 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 *ASSESSED 0 KEY: 00464198 CTL.:' LOC:9815 MC KENZIE ST SW JV:00000 MAP:- NOOPR UT1: UT2: AREA: 00 ROLL SEQ: 60925 ST ANTHONY'S PARISH .33AC NON ASSESSABLE ***It*********x***-M$****** 9905 SW MCKENZIE CO 31261 12/22/83 LESS .03AC TO TL 201 TIGARD OR 97223 CO 82-22630 11-09-82 LESS .01AC TO STREET SALE 0000 PR-1.1-497 2S12BD 00500 PCA: 2012 DIST:: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 81,500 AD VALOREM 2,069.44 KEY: 00464205 CTL: LOC:12693 PACIFIC HUT SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 23,500 NET TAX 2,069.44 UT1: UT2:: AREA.:ZPHY ROLL SEQ: 60926 *ASSESSED 105,000 3% DISCOUNT 62.08 ,t, nttLnLN r`J LnclrtLn LU GGU-J t-Cr(...LL O-) �.fnnL.ti t s u►t. 9905°- SCL MC KE1:Ii.E ST CO 82-22630 11:-0.9-82 LESS .20AC TO STREET TIGARD OR 97223 SALE 0000 02590723= 2S12BD 00201 PCA: 9602. DIST_ 023-74 *ASSESSED 0 Kest 01279976 CTL: LOC: JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR UTI: UTZ: AREA: 00 ROLL SEQ. 60923- THE ARCHDIOCESE OF PORTLAND .96AC NON-ASSESSABLE BY ST ANTHONY'S CHURCH: NORTH TIGARDVILLE AMENDED PT LOTS 46-51 12675 SW PACIFIC HWY SALE 1182 82031261 V OC H TIGARD OR 97223 _-- - 2512BD 00300 � PCA: 9602 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 *ASSESSED 0 KEY: 00464189 CTL: LOC:12675 PACIFIC HWY SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR UTI:: UTZ: AREA 00 ROLL. SEQ: 60924 . _ - FRANCISCAN FATHERS- OF OREGO 1.15AC NON-ASSESSABLE BY ST ANTHONYS CHURCH SALE 0000 03290022 12675 SW7 PACIFIC HUT TIGARD OR 97223 2S12BD 00400 PCA: 9602 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 *ASSESSED 0 KEY: 004641.98 CTL: LOC:9815 MC KENZIE ST SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR UT1: UTZ: AREA: 00 ROLL SEQ:= 60925 ST ANTHONY'S PARISH" .33AC NON ASSESSABLE *************************** 1 9905 SW MCKENZIE CO 31261 12/22/83 LESS .03AC TO IL 201 TIGARD OR 97223 CO 82-22630 11-09-82 LESS .01AC TO STREET SALE. 0000 PR11-497 ___. _ -- - ` . .- a. - -. 2S128D= 00500- PCA: 2012 DIST:: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 81,500 AD VALOREM 2,069.44 , KEY: 00464205 CTL: LOC:12693- PACIFIC HWY SW' JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 23,500 NET TAX 2,069.44 AREA::ZPHY ROLL SEQ 60926 *ASSESSED 105,000 3X DISCOUNT 62.08 FUNK.. JAMES H LOT PT 50 BLOCK NORTH TIGARDVILLE AMMD TAXABLE 100,800 CURRENT TAX 2,007.36 cUTI: . X.BERGMANN. FLOYD H: .32AC D 12693-12.705 SW PACIFIC HU *** DELINQUENT TAXES *** . MARINE M. ZONE = C-3 SALE. 0000 10900416 11600, W 9QTK AVE TIGARD OR- 972231 - -- r,t-itr3 ***-***Mit ttirMitsIrtitt ter* **,*******tt*tr:r*****-, ***-******:**,t**+t*:**:*4a*t****************************************fit********* *** MARKET 5573.546,.100 MARKET 5573,-546,100 LAND 1905,884,400 BLD 3667,661,700 SP-FEAT BASE-01 5340275000.00 BASE-02 350210.00 BASE-03 293707.00 BASE-04 53535.00 BASE-05 197993.00 - BASE-06. 595603.00 BASE-07 - - .00 BASE-08- - -----.00 BASE-09 -- ------.00 BASE-10 - - .00 - AD VALOREK 118,678,974..64 STATE PAID 5,939,867.44 SPEC ASSMT 5,599,687.42 NET TAX 118,338,794.62 3% DISCOUNT 3,550,167.99 -t• CURRENT TAX1I4,788.626..63 f z ROLL:: PARCEL NUMBER: ORDER. Li A. 5. H_ I K` G T 0 N C 0 U N T Y PROPERTY VALUES FOR 1984-85 REAL PROPERTY 10/16/84 PAGE 4422 ROLL-CONTROL 1 • • cl 1 ROLL. PARCEL. NUMBER ORDER: A. S- H I N: G: T 0: N COUNTY_ PROPERTY VALUES FOR 1984-85 REAL PROPERTY 10/16/84 PAGE 4422 ROLL-CONTROL • .�12BD OO600 PCA: 2012 DIST:- 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 40,300 AD VALOREM 2,194.64 00464214= CTL: LOC•12725 PACIFIC HWY SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VA! 71,100 NET TAX 2,194.64 - : UTt: UT2: AREA:ZPHY ROLL. SEQ:= 60927 *ASSESSED 111,400 3X DISCOUNT 65.84 v .1 I. FUNK. JAMES H. LOT PT 50 ----BLOCK---- -- .-15AC _ -- - • - -. -_-: TAXABLE 106.900 CURRENT- TAX- - 2,128.80-- - : . % BERGMANN,. FLOYD H= NORTH TIGARDVILLE. AMMD D 12725 SW. PACIFIC HWY *t* DELNU I Q ENT TAXES *** MARINE M. ZONE = C-3 SALE 0000 10900416 11600-' SW 90TH-. AVE TIGARD OR 97223- 2S12BD- 00601: PCA:, 2012 DIST: 023-74 D 23- 74 LAND 43,300 AD VALOREM 932.07 KEY: 00464223 CT_L= LOC9765 MC KENZIE; ST SW- JV:00000 MAP: NCOPR BLD-VAL 4,000 NET TAX 932.07 UT1- UT2: AREA.:-ZPHY ROLL SEQ: 6092 • *ASSESSED 47,300 3% DISCOUNT 27.96- ' - --- FUNK,: JAMES` H. LOT PT 50 BLOCK .17AC TAXABLE 45,400 CURRENT TAX 904.11 • DELINQUENT TAXES - � �.BERGMAAIN',- ELOYD H. NORTH TIGARDVILLE AMMiD D 9765-9785 SW MC KENZIE. ST *** $** BRINE N ZONE = C-3- SALE 0000 10900416 11600: SW' 90TH: AVE . • TIGARD OR 97223- 2S-12BD 00700 . PCA: 2012 _ _ -_DIST:_.023-74 D _ _ _ _-_ _ --LAND_._ . _ 30,0.0.0_ AD_VALOREM . 1,54.1..83 . . KEY:: 00464232 CTL: LOC:-9830 MC KENZIE ST SW JV:94568 -MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 48,200- NET TAX 1,541.83 UTI: UTZ: AREA:ZPHY ROLL SEQ. 60929 *ASSESSED 78,200 3X DISCOUNT 46.25 SAMUEL,. CHARLES. H AND• M78374- 49700 001 OVA 3037 2020721 TAXABLE 75,100 CURRENT TAX 1,495.58 .t' NMA J .16AC NORTH TI GARDVILLE A- ---_ii30- SW'. MCKENZIE ST D 9830 SW MC KENZIE ST ZONE = A-2. TIGARD OR 97223= SALE 1079 79045090 I WD Q - - --tv 2512& 00701 PCA 2012 DIST: 023-74 LAND 250,100 AD VALOREM 9,022.97 iKEY 00464241 CTL: LOC: JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 207,700 NET TAX 9,022:.97 i . l UTI: UT2: AREA.ZPHY ROLL SEQ: 60930 C-3 *ASSESSED 457,800 3% DISCOUNT 270.69 . SPADA, FRED .96AC ZONE = C= 3 TAXABLE ' 439,500 CURRENT TAX 8,752.28 1137 SE UNION AVE S ALE 1278-- 78057158 I WD Q PORTLAND- - OR 97214 1 2SI2BD 00702 PCA: 7012 DIST: 023-74 23 74 LAND 49,400 AD VALOREM 5,955.78 r KEY: 0046.4269 CTL:5016= LOC: JV:99790 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 252,800 NET TAX 5,955.78 UTI: UT2:: AREA:X-2. ROLL SEQ.:: 60931 *ASSESSED 302,200 3% DISCOUNT 178.67 LOEWER.: JOHN A PT LOT 7 85AC TAXABLE 290,100 =CURRENT TAX. 5,777.11 ` X CARVETH. JOHN_ AND SUSAN. K NORTH TIGARDVILLE ZONE = A-2 • 2475 SW 1:03RD SALE 0283 83105454 I CT Q. PORTLAND OR 97225 2512BD :00800 PCA 9602 D•IST: 023-74 D 23 74 Fw *ASSESSED 0 K • EY 00464278` CTL: LOC:12650 GRANT AVE SW JV:00000 MAP:. NOOPR . UTt UTZ: AREA: 00 ROLY SEQ: 60932 = ARCHDIOCESE OF PORTLAND .44AC NON-ASSESSABLE - _______ --__ __�__ _ :v.___..__.-_ . MOBIL OIL, CORPORATION .21AC ZONE = C-3 CURRENT TAX 1,023.59 PROPERTY TAX. DEPT PO BOX 290 DALLAS TX° 75221. 2S12BD 01400 PCA: 2012, DIST_ 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 76,f00 AD VALOREM 4,013.65 KEY= 00464401 CTL: LOC:12815 PACIFIC HWY SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 127,200 NET TAX 4,013..65 UT1: UT2: AREA:ZPHY ROLL SEQ: 60946 *ASSESSED 203,600 3% DISCOUNT 120.41 MOBIL OIL CORPORATION 3OAC D 12815 SW PACIFIC HWY TAXABLE 195,500 CURRENT TAX 3,893.24 PROPERTY TAX DEPT ZONE = C-3 PO BOX 290 DALLAS TX 75221 2512BD 01501: PCA 7012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 82,000 AD VALOREM 10,622.23 KEY: 00464410 CTL: LOC;:9815 WALNUT SW JV:00000 MAP: 00008 BLD-VAL 457,000-NET TAX 10,622..23 OT1: UT2:: AREA:X-2 ROLL SEQ: 60947 *ASSESSED 539,000 3% DISCOUNT 318.67 43 TATE,- NOAH_ AND LYDI A. A 70AC **********e**************** TAXABLE 517,400 CURRENT TAX 10,303.56 Z. KINGS- CHOICE,. LTD X KINGS CHOICE,_ LTD 1/84 - 84001755 BY BUTTERFIELD CAPITAL CORP SALE 01 84 84001755 1 CT M 1220 EAST BIRCH ST ..BREA CA 92621 tr Via_ _ _S12BD 01502 PCA:: 7012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 157,300 AD VALOREM 20,363.69 ' . KEY:. 00464429 CTL: LOC:9815 WALNUT SW JV:00000 MAP: 00008 BLD-VAL 875,900 NET TAX 20,363.69 { fa -OTT: _ _„UT2- , AREA:X-2 ROLL SEQ:. 60948 *ASSESSED 1033,200 3% DISCOUNT 610.91 TATE, NOAH AND LYDIA. A 2.20AC ********** *************** TAXABLE. «.991,,900,.CUf�REISiT.. �X.��_.i_Q.752,,75, Yj} 2:KINGS CHOICE. LTD X: KINGS CHOICE,- LTD 1/84 - 84001755 d . BT BUTTERFIELD CAPITAL CORP SALE 0184 84001755 I CT M .. ` 1-220= EASH: BIRDH: ST BREA CA 92623 2S12BD 01503- PCA:: 2012 DIST: 023-74 D A3 LAND 326,200 *TIGRDELSW 1,461.65 KEY: 00464438 CTL:5016 LOC:12740: PACIFIC HWY` SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 628,600 AD VALOREM 18,817.79 0 UT11° UTZ: 1461.65 AREA:ZPHY ROLL SEQ: 60949 *ASSESSED 954,$00 SPEC ASSMT 1,461.65 VILLAGE SQUARE 1:.44AC +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ TAXABLE 916,600 NET TAX 20,279.44 X- GOSPODIr�fl IC. ROSE B OF E #751 84-85 8/9/84 SALE 0000 11190756 UT2 1,461.65 3% DISCOUNT 608.38 12770; SW PACIFIC HWY CURRENT TAX 19,671.06 r TIGARD OR 97223 2S.12BD 01600: PCA: 9602 DIST: 023-74 23 74 *ASSESSED 0 KEY:. 00464447 CTL: LOC:- JV:55816 MAP: NCOPR UT1:. UT2:: AREA:: ROLL SEQ: 60950 TIGARD COMMUNITY METHODIST 3-74AC NON-ASSESSABLE CHURCH ZONE = C-3` 9845 SW WALNUT TIGARD OR 97223 2S12BD~01601_ PCA: 2002 DIST: 023-74 23 74 LAND 42,700 AD VALOREM 841.73 • KEY: 00989988 CTL: LOC: JV:55816 MAP: NOOPR *ASSESSED 42,700 NET TAX 841.73 UT1: UTZ: AREA:ZPHY ROLL SEQ: 60951 TAXABLE 41,000 3% DISCOUNT 25.25 BERTULEIT,. DANIEL AND ..43AC PT LOTS E. F FREWING TRACTS CURRENT TAX 816.48 BURTON,- WILLIAMH ZONE = C-2. SALE 1179 79046965 V WD Q PO BOX 23338 TIGARD OR 97223 2S12BD 01700 PCA: 2012. DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 108,200 AD VALOREM 2,79416 't' KEY: 00464456 CTL: LOC:12860 PACIFIC HWY SW JV:29674 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 33,600 NET TAX 2,794.16 UT1: UT2: AREA:ZPHY ROLL SEQ: 60952. *ASSESSED 141.800 3% DISCOUNT 83.82 PEAVEY STATIONS INC .45AC SALE 0000 09700206 TAXABLE 136,100 CURRENT TAX 2,710.34 - P 0 BOX 570. MC MtNNVILL.E OR 97128 t 5710*wSW CASTLE. DRIVE _^ -- -- ~_w- - - - CURRENT TAX 2,194.81 ALOHA. OR 97007 *** DELINQUENT TAXES *** 2SIZAC 01700 PCA: 2012 DIST: 023-74 23 74 LAND 36,600 AD VALOREM 849.95 : KEY: 0046184-1: CTL: LOC: SJV:33097 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 6,500 NET TAX 849.95 L ,. Mt UTZ: AREA:IT C ROLL SEQ: 60665 *ASSESSED 43,100 3X DISCOUNT 25.50 " VILLAGE SQUARE .15AC **************t*****tt***** TAXABLE 41,400 CURRENT TAX 824.45 x GOSPODINOVIC.. ROSE B OF E #751 84-85 8/9/84 CO 39984 7/11/84 *** DELINQUENT TAXES *** 1.2770: SW PACT€IC HWY CODE CHANGE 23-20 TO 23-74 CO 35399 6/14/82 TIGARD OR 97223 CODE CHANGE 23-74 TO 23-20 SALE 0000 11190756 - _ -- _ _ _ 2S12AC 01701 PCA: 2012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 65,100 AD VALOREM 2,475.91 KEY: 00461850 CTL:: LOC:12700 PACIFIC HWY SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 60,500 NET TAX 2,475.91 L U11 UT2: AREA:ZTC ROLL SEQ: 60666 *ASSESSED 125,600 3% DISCOUNT 74.28 i '. ****�r**********tt********** TAXABLE 120,600 CURRENT TAX 2,401.63 PATERSOT+F. J ALLAt1. 23AC DOLORES T CO 39984 7/11/84 CODE CHANGE 23-20 TO 23-74 *** DELINQUENT TAXES *** 77O0-- SW PACIFIC CO 35399 6/14/82 CODE CHANGE 23-74 TO 2.3-20 AR OR 97223 B OF E REC 81-82. 2S12AC 01703. PCA: 2012 DIST: 023-74 LAND 42.200 AD VALOREM 960.82 .nKEY: 00461869° CTL.•-. - �LOC �`°'''" - �" -°'°--- _T JV:12291-- - -MAP: 00008 - -BID-VAL s .. 6.60ALNET_TAX.___. ,�.."_�, 960.82 I UT1: UTZ.: AREA:-ZTC. ROLL SEQ: 60667 *ASSESSED 48,800 3X DISCOUNT -28.82`~ • i ç1)•!EL_ SPRINGER. JERRY- C .lBAC *****a******t:************* TAXABLE. 46,800 CURRENT TAX 932.00 7970 STS" NORTHVALE WAY CO° 39984 7/11/84 CODE CHANGE 23-20 TO 23-74 PORTLAND OR 97225 SPRINGER, JERRY C 1/84 - 84003421 CO 35399 6/14/82. SALE 0184 84003421 I WD M CODE CHANGE 23-74 TO 23-20 2S12AC 01.704- PCA: 2012 DIST: 023-74 D LAND 65,600 AD VALOREM 4,124.46 ;_ I KEY:" 00461878 CTL: LOC:12720 PACIFIC HWY SW JV:12292 MAP: 00008 BLD-VAL 143,700 `NET 1AX° " 4,124.46 UT1:: UT2: AREA:ZTC ROLL SEQ: 60668 *ASSESSED 209,300 3X DISCOUNT - 123.73 SPRINGER. JERRY' C .24AC *************************** TAXABLE 200,900 CURRENT TAX 4,000.73 7970` SW= NORTHVALE WAY CO 39984 7/11/84 CODE CHANGE 23-20 TO 23-74 PORTLAND OR 97225 SPRINGER-, JERRY C 1/84 - 84003421 CO 35399 6/14/82 CODE CHANGE 23-74 TO 23-20 ---- - , B OF E REC 81-82 SALE 0184 84003421 1 WD_i __ ZS12AC 01800 --- PCA: 7012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 112,400 AD VALOREM 14,362.78 _ KEY: 00461881 CTL: LOC:12730 PACIFIC SW JV:30245 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 616,400 NET TAX 14,362.78 *ASSESSED 728 800 DISCOUNT 430.88 ;` T1:: UT2 AREA:X-2. ROLL SEQ: 60669 � 3%� x /qi .LLISO�+t, KENNETH V 1._81AC **********************t**** TAXABLE 699.600 CURRENT TAX 13,931.90 LAVELLE 0 CO'° 39984 7/11/84 CODE CHANGE 23-20 TO 23-74 . 45` NE UNION CO 35399 6/14/82: CODE CHANGE 23-74 TO 23-20 PORTLAND OR 97211 SALE 0000 08470976 . 2512A0 02200 PCA:. 7002 DIST: 023-74 23 74 LAND 125,400 AD VALOREM 2,471.82 KEY:. 00461921 CTL_ LOC: JY:22569 MAP: NOOPR *ASSESSED 125,400 NET TAX 2,471.82 UT1 UT2: AREA:X=2 ROLL SEQ: 60670 TAXABLE 120,400 3% DISCOUNT 74.15 MAIN STREET LAND 3.80AC *************g************* CURRENT TAX 2,397.67 CORPORATION CO 39984 7/1184 CODE CHANGE 23-20 TO 23-74 *** DELINQUENT TAXES *** 10505 SW BARBUR BLVD #303 CO 35399 6/14/82 CODE CHANGE 23-74 TO 23-20 PORTLAND OR 97219 SALE 1081 81034700 V BS U ** ***, *****it*** ******, #*t*****************¢****#**************-*************:*************-***************t**************** , MARKET 5548`772:,500 MARKET 5548,772,500 LAND 1897,121,900 BLD 3651,650,600 SP-FEAT BASE-01: 5316530500_00 BASE-02 350210.00 BASE-03 292903.00 BASE-04 53535.00 BASE-05 197993.00 BASE-06 595455.00 BASE-07 .00 BASE-08 .00 BASE-09 .00 BASE-10 .00 AD VALOREM 118,192,012-08 STATE PAID 5,918,875.47 SPEC ASSMT 5,598,729.10 NET TAX 117,871,865.71 3% DISCOUNT 3,536,160.07 CURRENT TAX116,335,705.64 a ' - 2512CA. 00217 PCA: 1012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 21,000: AD'VALOREM 1,426.87 KEY: 00464848 CTL` LOC:13165: ASH DR SW JV:00000 MAPt OOPR BLD-VAL 59,200 STATE PAID 170.00 . • - - U fl UTat AREAtEA46 ROLL SEQ: 60990: *ASSESSED 80,200 NET TAX 1,2.56.87 - 4 .GANOE, L, M L81Z64- 521.88- 001 DVA D 13165- SW ASH DR VETERAN 7,500 3X DISCOUNT 37.71 13165: SW ASH. DRIVE LONE = R-7 SALE 0000 07970035 OOPR 0 CURRENT TAX 1,219.-16 TIGARD OR 97223- TAXABLE 69,500 . ZS12CA- 00218 PCA: 1012 DIST-: 023-74 D 23- 74 LAND 21,000 AD VALOREM 1,589.03 KEYS 0046485T CTL:2250- LOC:13155 ASH DR SW JV:00000 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 59,.600 STATE PAID 170.00 . UTZ: AREA:EA46 ROLL. SE.O:: 60991 *ASSESSED 80 600 NET TAX 1,419.03 = A:- Uri::: • MCCQY.; MARVIN K. DORIS. A- M54407 25733 001 - DVA LOT 16 - BLOCK 1 -OOPR - - - - 0 3X DISCOUNT _ 42.57 1.31.55= SW ASH- DR VIEWCREST TERRACE D- 13155 SW ASH DR TAXABLE. 77,400 CURRENT TAX 1,376.46 - TIGARD= OR. 97223 ZONE =- 7 SALE 0000 11280574 2S12CA 00219 PCA: 1012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 21,000 AD VALOREM 1,307.76 KEY:: 00464866- CIL: LOC:13145 ASH; DR. SW- JV:00000 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 45,400 STATE PAID 170.00 ' ` �t UTZ. AREA:EA46 ROLL SEC: 60992 *ASSESSED 66,400 NET TAX 1,137.76 X9111 i ALFRED- D 13145 SW ASH- DR, ZONE = R-7 OOPR 0 3% DISCOUNT 34.13 _iZABET}t TAXABLE 63.700 CURRENT TAX 1,103.63 13145 SW ASH- DRIVE TIGARD _OR 97223 - _ M v - - , _= a • - • : 2S12CA: 00220 PCA:. 1012 DIST: 023-74 D- 23- 74 LAND 21,000-AD VALOREM 1,114`.79 irift00464875 CTL: LOC:.13135; ASH DR SW JV:00000 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 35,600 STATE PAID 170.00 I: UTZ:° AREA:EA46- ROLL. SEC: 60993 *ASSESSED 56,600 NET TAX 944.79 i ITER. JOHN J- D 13135 SW- ASH- DR ZONE. = R-7 OOPR 0 3% DISCOUNT 28.34 R DIANE. TAXABLE 54,300 CURRENT TAX 916.45 13135 SW: ASH: DRIVE } _ TIGARD= OR 97223' 1 • - - 2S12CA- 00221 PCA: 1012 DIST: 023-74 D LAND 21,000 AD VALOREM 1,40,41.-W p KEY., 00464884 CTL:-- LOC:13125 ASH- DR- SW JV:00000- MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 50.200- STATE PAID 170.00 ' TZ: AREA:EA46 ROLL SEC: 60994 *ASSESSED 71,200 NET TAX 1,234.26 Ti:T1'. - JUNGVIRT,_ ZORA. 00PR 0 3X- DISCOUNT 37.03 ; 13125 SW` ASH: DRIVE TAXABLE 68,400 CURRENT TAX 1.197.23_ TIGARD- OR 97223" _ 2ST2CA 00222 PCA: 1012 - DIST-:-023=74- D 23 74-- -. _ - - -LAND---- - 21;000-AD VALOREM 1,174:30 - - - KEY: 00464895 CTL: LOC 113113 ASH. DR SW- JV:00000 MAP: OOPR PLD-VAL 38,600 STATE PAID 170.00 • - 1: UTZ:- AREA:EA46 ROLL SEQ.: 60995 *ASSESSED 59,600 NET TAX 1,00430 '1:-' -11 -' )AT11,. JERRY- R 3037 1.427861115 3037 1427861 OOPR 0 3X DISCOUNT 330.13 - - .. NA KRISTAN- D 13115 SW ASH DR ZONE = R-7- TAXABLE. 57,200 CURRENT TAX 974.17 13115 SW ASH. DR. TIGARD. OR: 97223- ZS12CA. 00223 PCA:: 101.2 DIST:- 023-74 D 23 74- LAND 21,000 AD VALOREM 1,291.32 ' KEY: 00464900 CTL: 30- LOC:13255- ASH AVE SW JV:00000- MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 44,500 STATE PAID 170.00- U7_IF UTZ: AREA:EA46 ROLL SEC: 60996 *ASSESSED 65,500 NET TAX 1,121.32 FAUST'. STEPHEN: A, LOT 22 BLOCK 2, VIEWCREST TERRACE OOPR 0 3X DISCOUNT 33.64 . - GWENDOLYN A D 13255 SW ASH AVE ZONE = R-7 TAXABLE 62,900 CURRENT TAX 1,087.68 ' P 0 BOX 868 SALE 0000- 09320512 SALEM. OR 97308 *****Ir***tt*,Yt#-#*,r****####fir#kt-**-**##****..yt+r#!t##sYArk*******it**** **ir********?4*****#**#*********#flit*********#********,,tit*****#*##***### MARKET 5583,823,800 MARKET 5583,823,800. LAND 1909,451,800 BLD 3674,372,000 SP-FEAT BASE-01 5350119000--00- 3ASE-02 350210.00 BASE-03 296183.00 BASE-04 53535.00 BASE-05 197993.00 BASE-06- 595603.00 BASE-07 00- BASE-08 .00 BASE-09 .00 BASE-10 .00 - AD VALOREM 118,881:,.072..39 STATE PAID 5,.944,.117.-44. SPEC ASSMT 5,602,165.73- NET TAX 118,539,120.68 3X DISCOUNT 34556,177.75 - CURRENT TAX114,982,-942..93 • f - 2S12CA H00226 PCA: 1012 DIST: 023--74 D 23 74 LAND 21,000 AD VALOREM 1.,474.07 KEY: 00464937 CTL:= LOC:13165 ASH AVE SW JV:00000 MAP:: OOPR BLD-VAL 53,800 STATE PAID 170.00 UT.1: UT2: AREA:EA46 ROLL SEQ: 60999 *ASSESSED 74,800 NET TAX 1,304.07 THOM0S,, DORENE L LOT 19 BLOCK 2 VIEWCREST TERR OOPR 0 3X DISCOUNT 39.12. 13165 SW ASH DR. D 13165 SW ASH AVE ZONE = R-7 TAXABLE 71,800 CURRENT TAX 1,264.95 TIGARD OR. 97223 SALE 0000 10370948 2512CA 0022T PCA: 1012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 21,000 AD VALOREM 1,484.33 KEY: 00464946 CTL: LOC:1311 0 ASH DM Ski" JV:.00400 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 54,300 STATE PAID 170.00 T1= 1972: AREA:EA46 ROLL SEQ:° 61000 *ASSESSED 75,300 NET TAX 1,314.33 EDIN, PHILLIP R ANITA. J. 94518 0100010734 RTS 9451806-0110734 OOPR 0 3% DISCOUNT 39.43 13110= SW' ASH' DRIVE D 13110 SW ASH DR ZONE = R-7 TAXABLE 72,300 CURRENT TAX 1,274.90 TIGARD OR 97223 2512CA 00228 PCA: 1012 DIST: 023-74 D A3 LAND 21,000 *TIGRDELSW 92.25 KEY: 00464955 CTL:4076 LOC:13120 ASH DR SW JV:00004 MAP: 00PR BLD-VAL 49,100 AD VALOREM 1,381.68 Ak T1: UT2: 92.25 AREA:EA46 ROLL SEQ: 61001 *ASSESSED 70,100 SPEC ASSMT 92.25 41-14. 1 JUNGVIRT,• MARK IVAN; AND *************************** JUNGVIRT, MARK AND LAURA TAXABLE 67,300 NET TAX 1,473.93 .URA ANN 9/83 83035694 SALE 0983 83035694 I UD Q UT2 92.25 3% DISCOUNT 44.22 13120 SW ASH_ DRIVE CURRENT TAX 1,429.71 TIGARD OR. 97223 „12CA 00229 PCA: 101-2: DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 21,000 AD VALOREM 1,174.30 KEY: 00464964 CTL:2250 LOC:13130 ASH DR SW JV:00000 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 38,600 STATE PAID 170.00 UT1-: UT2. AREA:EA46 ROLL SEQ: 61002 *ASSESSED - 59,600 NET TAX 1,004.30 .CHMIERER, CLARENCE`.- 15 49079- -1'001---=- �-�I-TS-15 49079 I°001 . - --.. ---OOPR -' --- ------,0 3%-DISCOUNT- . -30-13---30.-13- --- 3130= SW ASH DR LOT 16 BLOCK 2 VIEUCREST TERRACE TAXABLE 57,200 CURRENT TAX 974.17 •f; TIGARD OR 97223 D 13130 SW ASH DR ZONE = R-7 SALE 1279 79050389 I UD Q 2512CA 00230 PCA 1012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 21,000 AD VALOREM 923.85 KEY: 00464973 CTL:= LOC:13140 ASH DR SW ,1V:99105 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 36,300 STATE PAID 170.00 'UT1: UT2: AREA:EA46 ROLL SEQ: 61003 *ASSESSED 57,300 NET TAX 753.85 . HRISMAN,. CHARLES S�JR 94518 0300012801 RTS 9451806-0112801 OOPR 0 3X_DISCOUNT 22.62 LIZABETH A LOT 15 BLOCK 2- VIEWCREST TERRACE DISABLDVET 10,000 CURRENT TAX 731':23 .. 13140 SW ASH DR D 13140 SW ASH DR ZONE = R-7 TAXABLE 45,000 TIGARD OR. 97223 SALE 0000 11240894- • NMN -N--sM 2512CA 00231 PCA:' 1012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 21,000 AD VALOREM 1,246.17 KEY: 00464982 CTL: LOC:9588 FREWING CT SW JV:00000 MAP: 00012 BLD-VAL. 42,200 STATE. PAID 170.00 ,- E. Ti: -- UT2: .AREA:EA46 ..ROLL SEQ 61004 . .*ASSESSED ___63,200 NET TAX 1,076.17 1+ ;'TONE,; HARRY HENRY AND M06977 77902 001 DVA LOT 14 BLOCK 2 OOPR 0 3X DISCOUNT 32.29 T. HARM° P VIEWCREST TERRACE D 9588 SW FREWING CT TAXABLE 60,700 CURRENT TAX 1,043488 4`= °588 SW FREWING COURT ZONE = R-7 SALE 0883 84018652 I WD Q ` JARD OR 97223 2S12CA 00232 PCA: 1012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 21,000 AD VALOREM 1,069.64 R 4...awa■mo. E KEY`:: 00464991 CTL:-2250 LOC:9560 FREWING CT SW JV:00000 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 33,300 STATE PAID 170.00 UT1_:. UT2,:, AREA:EA16 ROLL SEQ: 61005 *ASSESSED 54,300 NET TAX 899.64 STEINBORN, ROBERT A. L62236: 13901 001 DVA D 9560 SW FREWING CT OOPR 0 3% DISCOUNT 26.99 MARJORIE M ZONE = R-7 TAXABLE. 52,100 CURRENT TAX 872.65 9560. SW FREUTAIG COURT TIGARD OR 97223 2S12CA 00233 PCA 1012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 21,000 AD VALOREM 1,196.91 KEY: 00465008 CTL:= LOC:9540 FREWING CT SW JV:00000 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 39,700 STATE PAID 170.00 UTl: UT2: AREA:EA46 ROLL SEQ: 61006 *ASSESSED 60,700 NET TAX 1,026.91 HANG.. GLENN= 29918 5100511039 RTS D 9540 SW FREWING CT 00PR 0 3% DISCOUNT 30.81 9540 SW FREWING COURT SALE 0782 82018196 I WD Q TAXABLE 58,300 CURRENT TAX 996.10 TIGARD OR 97223 1 2S12CA 00234 PCA:- 1012 DIST: 023_-74 0D- 23 74 - :_LAND____._ ____."21.0000 AD VALOREM 1.049.11 . IIIPIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIMIIIOIIIIIIIIMIIIIIMIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIEEIIIIIIIIIINIIMIIIIIIIIII TIGARD- OR 97223 2S12CA 03211;_ PCA 1.012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 21,000 AD VALOREM 1,192.82 Kest :,;0464786: CTL:7777" LOC:13225 ASH- DR SW JV:00000 MAP: OOPR. BLD-VAL 39,500 STATE PAID 170.00 Lint UTZ:, AREA:EA46 ROLL SEQ.. 60984 *ASSESSED 60,500 NET TAX. 1,022.82 BRADEEN'.. JOHN G IRENE SENIOR CITIZE DEFERRAL OOPR 0 3X DISCOUNT 30.68 13225 SW ASH DRIVE TAXABLE 58,100 CURRENT TAX 992.14 TIGARD: OR 97223 2S12CA: 00212 PCA. 1012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 21,000 AD VALOREM 1,283.16 KE' X0464795 CIL: LOC::13215 ASH DR SW JV:00000 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 44,100 STATE PAID 170.00 1 UT1 UTZ AREA:EA46 ROLL SEQ: 60985 *ASSESSED 65,100 NET TAX 1,113.16 GEHRING. JOSEPH; L ANN_ M D 13215 SW ASH DR ZONE = R-7 OOPR' 0 3% DISCOUNT 33.39 I3215-.Slit ASH DRIVE TAXABLE 62,500 CURRENT TAX 1,079.77 TIGARD- OR 97223` "° 2S12CA 00213 PCA:; 1 012 DIST 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 21,000 AD VALOREM 1,287.23 KEY: 00464802 CTL.5573 LOC:13205 ASH DR SW JV;00000. MAP: 00PR BLD-VAL 44,300 STATE PAID 170.00 UT1t UTZ: AREA:EA46 ROLL SEQ- 60986 *ASSESSED 65,300 NET TAX 1,117.23 `= KING. PAUL M CATHERINE 202Z 042516TTS 2022 042516 OOPR 0 3X DISCOUNT 33.52 13205 SW ASH: DRIVE D 13205 SW ASH DR ZONE = R-7 TAXABLE 62,700 CURRENT TAX 1,083.71 TIGARD OR 97223 _•.M_-_sNN 2S12CA 0021.4: PCA 1O1t DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 2.1,000 AD VALOREM 1.018.28 28 KEY: 00464811 CTL:- LOC:13195 ASH DR SW JV:00000 MAP: OOPR. BLD-VAL 38,500 STATE PAID 170.00 UT1:° -UTZ:- ° AREA:EA46 ROLL SEQ - =60987 - « - _ . ,.r.. *ASSESSED, __.,59,500 NET TAX 848.28 RANDALL. ALTON 0 VERNA E 162349 15847 001 DVA D 13195 SW ASH DR. VETERAN 7.500 3% DISCOUNT - `-"`-= 25.45 - - '-{- 13195 SU ASH DRIVE ZONE = R-7 OOPR 0 CURRENT TAX 822.83 TIGARD: OR 97223 TAXABLE 49.600 2S12CA. 0021.5' PCA: 1012 DIST:: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 21.000 AD VALOREM 1,584.90 KEY:: 004648201 CTL:2250 LOC-13185 ASH DR S4+ JV:00000 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 59,400 STATE PAID 170.00 U = UT2 AREA:EA46 ROLL SEQ: 60988 *ASSESSED 80,400 NET TAX. 1,414.90 C N, GERALD H P00923 72248 001 DVA LOT 13 BLOCK 1 00PR - 0 3% DISCOUNT 42.45 r KKRcN° L VIEUCREST TERRACE D 13185 SW ASH DR TAXABLE. 77,200 CURRENT TAX 1,372.45 13185 SW ASH DRIVE ZONE = R-7 SALE. 0000 09990287 TIGARD OR 97223 2S-T2CA- 00216 PCA:: 1012 DIST 023-74 D LAND 21.000 AD VALOREM 1,513.06 ET:- 00464839 CTL:5575 LOC:13175 ASH DR SW JV:00000 MAP 00PR BLD-VAL 55,800 STATE PAID 170.00 T1. _-UT2:: AREA:EA46 ROLL SEQ - 60989 *ASSESSED - 76,800 NET TAX 1,3 43.06 USN.. RICHARD _---- - .. n�cr[ARD: L AND M5801 4 29340 001 DVA Dy1 3175 SW ASH DR 00PR 0 3X DISCOUNT -40.29 __ ._ PENELOPE ZONE = R-7 SALE 0880 80029094. 1 UD Q TAXABLE 73,700 CURRENT TAX. 1,302.77 13175 SW ASH DR. TIGARD OR 97223 :i 3. - �= vie= ARcA:cV)! HULL SLU: 6131! *ASSESSED 72,?N NET TAX 1,263.01 RICHMAN, GENE N. 17523 135495 RTS 17523 135495 OOPR 0 3X DISCOUNT 37.89 ELLA LYNNE LOT 3 BLOCK BURNHAM PARK TAXABLE 69,800 CURRENT TAX 1,225.12 13 120 SW ASH: ST _ D 13120 SW ASH ST ZONE = R-7 TIGARD OR 97223 SALE 0000 10480350 2:S12D8: 01000 PCA: 1012 DIST: 07.3-74 D LAND 23,000 AD VALOREM 1,336.53 KEY: 004682c33 CIL.:2250 LOC:13100 O'MAPA ST SW JV:35762 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 44,800 NET TAX 1,336.53 UT-1 UTZ: AREA:EV57 ROLL SEQ: 61378 *ASSESSED 67,800 3% DISCOUNT 40.10 Z . • GRIMM.,_ WALTER R AND LOT 4 BLOCK BURNHAM PARK TAXABLE 65,100 CURRENT TAX 1,296.43 • 1 [ ELI4ERIE J D 13100" SW O'MARA ST ZONE = R-7 940G HILL ST SALE 1O8U 80035564 I. VD Q TIGARD- OR 97223 2S 12DB OT100 PCA 1012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 23,000 AD VALOREM 1,379.60 % KEYS 00668292. CTL. 2250 LOC:13215 HILL CT F . J11:35762 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 47,000 STATE PAID '70.00 a. `' UT1: UTZ: AREA:EV57 ROLL SEQ: 6. ', *ASSESSED 70,000 NET TAX 1,209.60 BARNES. TERRY- N: GAYLE L M29829 01155 001 DVA L0: 5 BLOCK OOPR 0 3X DISCOUNT 3;..29 13215 Sit HI LL CT BURNHAM PARK 0 ;3215 SW HILL CT TAXABLE. 67,200 CURRENT TAX 1,173.31 TIGARD OR 97223 ZONE = R-7 SALE 0000 10390500 r 1 =-2-s12DB' 01200 PCA: 1012 - DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 23,000 AD VALOREM 1,336.53 KEY: 00468309 CTL:2250 LOC:-13235 HILL CT SW JV:35762 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 44,800 STATE PAID 170.00 L= • UT1 UTZ: AREA.:EV57 ROLL SEQ: 61380 *ASSESSED 67,800 NET TAX 1,166.53 HERBERHOL2.. ALBERT J AND P02386 73711 001 DVA LOT 6 BLOCK OOPR 0 3% DISCOUNT 35.00 . - MARC!. b- BURNHAM PARK D 13235 SW HILL CT TAXABLE 65,100 CURRENT TAX 1,131.53 1.3235 SU :TILL CT ZONE = R:7 SALE 1278 78056456 I WD Q TIGARD OR. 97220 2S12DB= 01300 PCA 1002. DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 201O AD VALOREM 4078.5'3 , KEY:: 0040831-8 CTL: LOC::1 3240 HILL CT SW JV:35762. MAP: NOOPR *ASSESSED 20,700 NET TAX 408.53 '• UT1t UT2::: AREA:EV57 ROLL SEQ: 61381 TAXABLE 19,900 3X DISCOUNT 12.26 PRUITT.. ARTHUR J MARY. E LOT 7 BLOCK, BURNHAM PARK CURRENT TAX 396.27 1L KLINKENBERG.. EDWARD C D 1.32-40 SW HILL. CT ZONE: = R-7 *** DELINQUENT TAXES *** LOUISE F SALE 0000 0962.0768 13240 SiW. VILLAGE GLEN DR TIGARD _ OR 97223" ----- - - 11 2S12DB 011400= PCA: 1012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 23,000 AD VALOREM 1,605.43 i at ` ~- EY: 00468327 CTL:4076 LOC:13230 HILL. CT SW JV:75199 MAP: 00007 BLD-VAL 58,500 STATE PAID 170.00 UTi: UTZ: AREA:E`i57- ROLL SEQ.:" 61382 *ASSESSED 81,500 NET TAX 1,435.43 GOTT,. DANIEL. R AND NJANE M LOT PT 8 AND PT 9 BURNHAM PARK OOPR 0 3% DISCOUNT 43.06 13230 SW HILL CT 13230 SW HILL- CT SALE 1183 83044318 I. WD Q TAXABLE 78,200 CURRENT TAX 1,392.37 TIGARD OR 97223` • 2SI2DB. 01600` PCA::" 1012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 23,000 AD VALOREM 1,406.34 KEY: 00468336- CTL: LOC13210 HILL CT SW JV:71723 MAP: 00PR BLD-VAL 48,40G STATE PAID 170.00 q tint UTZ: AREA:EV57` ROLL SEA.: 61383 *ASSESSED 71,400 NET TAX 1,236.34 1 STARK, RONALD F LOT PT 9 BLOCK BURNHAM PARK OOPR 0 3% DISCOUNT 37.09 9340 SV HILL STREET LOT 10 BLOCK D 13210 SW HILL CT TAXABLE 68,500 CURRENT TAX 1,199.25 TIGARD: OR 97.223 ZONE = R-7 SALE 0000 12170474" - ti25120;: 01700 PCA: 1012: DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 23,000 AD VALOREM 1,240.02 KEY': 00468345 CTL:4551 LOC:13225 BURNHAM CT SW JV:-1039 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 39,900 STATE PAID 170.00 OT1:: UTZ: AREA:EV57 ROLL SEC: 61384 *ASSESSED 62,900 f:ET TAX 1,070.02 JOHNSON, PAUL E MILDRED LOT PT 11 BLOCK BURNHAM PARK 00PR 0 3% DISCOUNT 32.10 9300; Sid` HILL. ST LOT PT 12 BLOCK D 13225 SW BURNHAM CT TAXABLE 60,400 CURRENT TAX 1,037.92 TIGARD OR 97223 ZONE = R-7 SALE 0000 10450830 25-12DB. 01801 PCA: 1.012 DIST: 023-74 23 74 LAND 23,000 AD VALOREM 1,326.23 KEY: 00468354 CTL: LOC: 13235 BURN„+M CT SW" JV:71037 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 44,300 STATE PAID 170.00 Uri: UTZ: AREA:EV57 ROLL SEQ: 61385 *ASSESSED 67 300 T . . • P JDF? t' RffRFRT a- nu c c .. ` - Cthrcdtjrttt j I.► 9'1 - (i 1L/t5; Cunt C IANGE as-"LO TO 23-74 TAXABLE 90,800 CURRENT TAx 1,643.32 89 i5 sw O'MARA ST CO 35399 6/14/82 CODE Cri.',NGE 23-74 TO 23-20 TIGARD OR 97223 2S1_2DB 00603 PCA: 1-012 DIST:= 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 20,000 AD VALOREM : .896.98 KE' : 00463238- CTL:5229 LOC:8885 O'MARA ST SW JV:00000: MAP: 00003 BLD-VAL. 76,300 STATE PAID 170.00 UT1: UTZ: AREA:EP56 ROLL SEQ: 61373 *ASSESSED 96,300 NET TAX 1,726.98 I OTTING„. LOIS E 8885 SW O'MARA ST +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ OOPR 0 3% DISCOUNT 51.81 8885 SW O'MARA ST OTTING. LOIS E 8/84 - 84031721 TAXABLE 92,400 CURRENT TAX 1,675.17 1 TIGARD OR 97223 CO 399E4 7/12/84 CODE CHANGE 23-20 TO 23-74 CO 35399 6/1 4/82 CODE CHANGE 23-74 TO 23-20 SALE 0000 11950758 2512DB 00604 PCA: 1012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 24,000 AD VALOREM ;.379.60 KEY: 00468,47 CTL:2250 LOC:8825 O'MARA ST SW JV:23361 -- MAP: OOPR-- BLD-VAL 46;000 'STATE PAID --. 170.00 UTt: UTZ: AREA:EF56 ROLL SEQ: 61374 *ASSESSED 70,000 NET TAX :.209.60 CHAMBERLAIN, DANTCE LLOYD .89 AC SALE 0000 08480351 OOPR 0 3% DISCOUNT 36.29 8825 SW O'MARA TAXABLE. 67,200 CURRENT TAX. 1,173.31 TIGARD OR 97223 2512D8_ 00700 PCA: 1.0.1; DIST:.. 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 23,000 AD VALORE': 1,307.76 j KEY.: 00468256 CTL.:2250 LOC: 13160 ASH ST SW JV:35762 MAP:_ NOOPR BLD-VAL 43,400 NET TAX 1,307,76 ., 'J11Tl:-,. UTZ: AREA:EV57` ROLL SEQ: 61375 *ASSESSED 66,400 3 DISCOUNT i 239.23 0ESfli , KEITH C LYNN E M34828 06154 001 DVA LOT 1 BLOCK TAXABLE 63,700 CURRENT TAX 13160• Sid: ASH AV E BURNHAM PARK D 131.60 SW O'MARA ST . TIGARD - ---, _ . R:.9Z223 ZONE R-7 -__ .- - - .SALE-0000 12030463 - - - --------- .-.w.. -- 2S12DB 00800 PCA:- 1012 DIST: 023-74 D LAND 23,000 AD VALOREM 1,283.16 KEY:- 00468265 CTL:4O76 LOC:13140 ASH AVE SW JV:00003 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL. 42,100 STATE PAID 170.00 3 R *ASSESSED 65,100 NET TAX 1,113.16 UT'6�.- UTZ: AREA:EV57 ROLL. SEQ: 61.76 BUIE, JOHN L AND MARTHA LOT 2 BURNHAM PARK SALE 0582 82011670 I CT Q OOPR 0 3% DISCOUNT 33.39 13140 SW ASH: AVE TAXABLE 62,500 CURRENT TAX 1,079.77 TIGARD OR 97223= 41 25.12DB 00900 PCAr 1012 GIST: 023-74 D 23 74 _ LAND 23.000 AD VALOREM 1,433: 1 KEY:. 00468274 CTL:=4551: LOC:13120 O'."9ARA- 57 SW JV:35762 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 49,700 STATE PAID 170.00 UT1: UTZ: AREA:EV57 ROLL SEQ: 61377 *ASSESSED 72,700 NET TAX 1,263.01 RICHMAN - GENE N 17523` 135495 RTS 17523 ►35495 OOPR 0 3% DISCOUNT 37.89 LLA LYNNE LOT 3 BLOCK BURNHAM= PARK TAXABLE 69,800 CURRENT TAX 1,225.12 3.120 SW` ASH_ ST D 13120, SW ASH ST ZONE = R-7 TIGARD OR 97223 SALE 0000 10480350 _ I2S1.2Da OiOG: . PCA: 1012 DIST; 0:3-74 0 LAND 23,000 AD VALOREM 1,336.53 KEY: 004682c33 CTL:7250 LOC:13100 D'MAPA ST SW JV:35762- MAP:: NOOPR 8LD-VAL 44,800 NET TAX 1,336.53 !- t _r *ASSESSED 67,800 3% DISCOUNT 40.10 �- �-T1:. uT2:: Ak�cA.:EV57 ROLL SEQ: 61378 ` r ]RIIIM,. WALTER M AND LOT 4 BLOCK BURNHAM PARK TAXABLE 65,100 CURRENT TAX 1,296.43 _LMER:IEJ D 13100 SW O'MARA ST ZONE = R-7 9400 _W: HILL ST SALE 1080 80035564 T. WD Q TIGARD OR 97223 2ST2DB 01%0 PCA: 1012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 23,000 AD VALOREM 1,379.60 KEY: 00468292 CTL:2250= LOC:13215 HILL CT S.' JV:35762 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 47,000 STATE PAID 170.00 071<: UT2: AREA:EV57 ROLL SEQ:. 6. ':;! *ASSESSED 70,000 NET TAX 1,-e0 .60 BARNES,.. TERRY N GAYLE L M29829 01155 001 OVA LO: 5 BLOCK OOPR 0 3X' DISCOUNT 3;..29 1321.5 SW HILL CT BURNHAM PARK D 13215 SW HILL CT TAXABLE 67,200 CURRENT TAX 1,173.31 TIGARD OR 97223 ZONE = R-7 SALE 0000 /0390500 I° 2S12DB 0 1,200 PGA: 1012. DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 23,000 AD VALOREM 1,336.53 k KEY: 00468309 CTL.:2250 LOC13235 HILL CT SW JV:35762 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 44,800 STATE PAID 170.00 On: UTZ: AREA:EV57 ROLL. SEQ: 61380 *ASSESSED 67,800 NET TAX 1,166.53 HERBERHOLZ:. ALBERT AND P02386 73711 001 DVA LOT 6 BLOCK OOPR 0 3% DISCOUNT 35.00 MAR CI D BURNHAM PARK D 13235- SW HILL CT TAXABLE 65,100 CURRENT TAX .-__ -1,131.53 ___ , 132V; cu 14,1i 1 CT - --- - STARK„ RONA_D F LOT PT 4 9 BLOCK BURNHAM PARK UUex. v ...$. u 1.�4t4u1.: 9340 SW HILL STREET LOT 10 BLOCK D 13210 SW HILL, CT TAXABLE 68,500 CURRENT TAX 1,199.25 TIGARD OR 97223 ZONE = R-7 SALE 0000 12170474 2S12DB 01!00= PCA:; 1012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 23,000 AD VALOREM 1,240.02 KEY 0046b545 CTL:4551 LOC:13225 BURNHAM. CT SW JV:71039 MAP: OOPR: BLD-VAL 39,900 STATE PAID 170.00 UTI: UT2: AREA.:EV57 ROLL SEO:, 61384- *ASSESSED 62,900 NET TAX 1 ,070.02 JOHNSON, PAUL E MILDRED LOT PT 11 BLOCK BURNHAM: PARK 00PR 0 3X DISCOUNT 32.10 9300 SW HILL ST LOT PT 12 BLOCK D 13225 S'►# BURNHAM CT TAXABLE 60,400 CURRENT TAX 1,037.92 TIGARD OR, 97223 ZONE = R-7 SALE 0000 10450830 i 2S12DB 0-184t PCA:: 1012 DIST 023-74 23 74 LAND 23,000 AD VALOREM 1,326.23 KEY: 00468354 CTL: LOC.:: 13235 BURNHAM: CT SW Jv:71037 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 44,300 STATE PAID 170.00 - Q.UTI: JT2: AREA:EV57 ROLL. SEO: 61385 *ASSESSED 67,300 NET TAX 1,156.23 PINDEL`-L., ROBEkITG AND 15 50339 I 001 - LOT PT 11 BLOCK GOPR _ 0 3X DISCOUNT 34.69 SHARON L. BURNHAM PARK LOT PT 12 BLOCK TAXABLE 64,600 CURRENT TAX 1,121.54 13235 SW BURNHAM CT ZONE = R-7 SALE 0879 79032145 I WD Q *** DELINQUENT TAXES *** TIGARD OR 97223 ,. **lttttm****-me!** -1,:**,-****..--*******4***,..Rtr*#er,kktith lair***fit*titme***tt ma..-e -+r4tt*********************#**x******************** ARKET 5619,181,500 MARKET 5619;,181,500 LAND 1923,790,300 BLD 3695.391,200 SP-FEAT BASE-01= 5383990300.00 BASE-02 350210.00 BASE-03 298403.00 BASE-04 53535.00 BASE.-05 197993.00 BASE-06 596098.00 BASE-07 .00 BASE-08 .00 BASE-09 .00 BASE-I0 .00 AD VALOREM` 11 9,576,452.18 STATE PAID 5,983,511.96 SPEC ASSMT 5,604,887.04 NET TAX 119,197,827.26 3% DISCOUNT 3,575,938.92 "CURRENT TAX115,621,.888.34 ,- -- - .--. ._ -z.t -__ _,_ . .,_ _ _ , _ _ _ __ _ . a- ir: tXCL:_ PARCEL. NUMBER. ORDER: W A S K I N G T O N C O U N T Y PROPERTY VALUES FOR 1984-85 REAL PROPERTY 10/16/84 PAGE 4454 ROLL-CONTROL a 01900 PCA: 1012: DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 23,000 AD VALOREM 1,377.59 KEY: 00468363: CTL_4O76 LOC:13245 BURNHAM CT SW JV:67653 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 46,900 NET TAX 1,377.59- . 11T1: UT2:._ AREA-EV57 ROLL SEQ.: 61386 *ASSESSED 69,900 3X DISCOUNT 41.33 POERTNER., HENRY R AND 299185100406898 RTS 29918 5100406898 TAXABLE 67,100 CURRENT TAX 1,336.26 BARBARA J- LOT 13 BLOCK BURNHAM PARK 132.45 SW BURNHAM. COURT LOT PT 8 BLOCK D 13245 SW BURNHAM CT TIGARD OR 97223. ZONE = R-7 SALE 1 080 80039829 I. WD Q 2a: 02000 PCA: 1012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 23,000 AD VALOREM 1,365.28 KEY: 00468372 CTL:5016 LOC:13255 BURNhAM CT SW JV:35762 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 46,300 STATE PAID 170.00 UT1t UT2: AREAtEV57 ROLL SEQ:. 61387 *ASSESSED 69,300 NET TAX 1,195.28 GESKE, MARIA G LOT 14- BLOCK. BURNHAM PARK OOPR 0 3X DISCOUNT 35.86 132.55 SW BURNHAM' COURT SALE 1282 82032049 I WD Q TAXABLE. 66,500 CURRENT TAX 1.1.59..42 TIGARD OR 97223 2S12DB 02100 PCA. 1012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 23,000 AD VALOREM 1,404.26 KEY: 00468381 CTL: LOC:13250 BURNHAM CT SW JV:69021 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 48,300 STATE PAID 170.00 x., - _.,______-__ --F_ _ r --_ -._-._« -..ASSESSED 71,300 Iry NET nveXnIt/fT 1,234.26 27-,sr .,__ UT � UT�- AREA- V5, ROLL SEQ: 61388 r o ; - - _ - - - • - 2S12DB; 02000. PCA:: 1012 DIST: 023-74 G 23 74 LAND 23,000 AD VALOREM 1,30).i6 KEY: 00468372 CTL:5016 LOC:13255 BURNHAM. CT SW JV:35762 MAP:. OOPR BLD-VAL 46,300 STATE PAID 170.00 UT1: UT2: AREA:EV57 ROLL. SEQ:. 61387 *ASSESSED 69,300 NET TAX 1,195.28 GESKE,: MART.' G LOT 14 BLOCK BURNHAM PARK 00PR 0 3% DISCOUNT 35.86 1:325-5 SW F:Sr(NHAM COURT SALE 1.282 82032049 I WD Q. TAXABLE. 66,500 CURRENT TAX 1.159.42 TIGARD OR 97223 2S12DB' 02100 PCA: 1012 DIST: 023-74. D 23 74 LAND 23,000 AD VALOREM 1,404.26 KEY`: 00468381. CTL: LOC:13250 BURNHAM CT SW Jv:69021 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 48,300 STATE PAID 170.00 UT1: UT2:: AREA::EV5( ROLL. SEQ: 61388 *ASSESSED 71,300 NET TAX 1,234.26 UHITAKER. ERMETT D JUDY LOT PT 16 BLOCK BURNHAM PARK 00PR 0 3% DISCOUNT 37.03 13250 SW BURNHAM: LOT 15 BLOCK FREWING ORCHARD TRACTS TAXABLE 68,400 CURRENT TAX 1,197.23 TIGARD OR 97223 SALE 000.0 12000300 2S12DB` 02201 PCA:. 1012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 - LAND 23,000 AD VALOREM - -1,361.15 KET 00468390 CTL: LOC:13240 BURNHAM CT SW JV:63441 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 46,100 STATE PAID 170.00 - UTt:, UT2.: AREA:EV57 ROLL. SEQ: 61389 *ASSESSED 69,100 NET TAX 1,191.15 STEWART. KENNETH H. FREWI:NG'S ORCHARD TRACTS LOT PT 5 BLOCK' 00PR 0 3Z DISCOUNT 35.73 DOROTHYP C BURNHAM PARK SALE 0000 09820304 TAXABLE 66.300 CURRENT TAX 1,155.42 13240 SW BURNHAM CT TGARD. OR 97223 2S :JB" 02300 PCA : 1012 DIST: 023-74 D 2. 74 LAND 23,000 AD VALOREM 1,414.50 fi- KEY`: 0046840T CTL: LOC •13230' BURNHAM CT SW JV:63443 MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 48,800 STATE PAID 170.00 Tlt UT2.: AREA:EV57__ROLL SEQ: 61390 *ASSESSED 71,800 NET TAX 1.244.50 AUT.. CLARENCE R LUCY A LOT PT 17 BLOCK BURNHAM PARK ------- ------00PR ---0-3Z,DISCOUNT__ ,_ -.. _Y_37.34 1-3230: SW! 1, BURNHAM: CT LOT PT 5 BLOCK FREWING ORCHARD TRACTS TAXABLE 68.900 CURRENT TAX 207;16 TIGARD- OR 97223 D 13230 SW BURNHAM CT ZONE v R-7 SALE 0000 11660892 _ . 2S12DC 00100. PCA:. 101Z' DIST: 023-74 D 23 78 LAND 20,000 AD VALOREM 940.29 KEY": 00468416 CTL:2250 LOC:9370 O'MARA ST SW JV:00000 MAP: 00PR BLD-VAL 27,700 STATE PAID 170.00 UT1: UTZ: AREA:EF56 ROLL SEQ: 61391 *ASSESSED 47,700 NET TAX 7700,29 ROUSSE, ARNOLD- V JR AND 94518 0300000766 RTS .46AC OOPR 0 3% DISCOUNT 23.17 JERRIE I D 9370 SW O'MARA. ST ZONE = R-7 TAXABLE 45,800 CURRENT TAX 74r.TF 9370` SW O'MARA SALE 0879 79035617 I WD Q TIGARD OR 97223 2S12DC 00101 PCA: 1012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 78 LAND 20,000 AD VALOREM 656.96 KEY: 00468425 CTL= LOC:9355 EDGEWOOD ST SW JV:00000 MAP:- 00PR BLD-VAL 13,300 STATE PAID 159.36 UT�is UTZ: AREA:EF56 ROLL-CEO:-- 61392 _ _ _ *ASSESSED. , . 33,300 NET TAX 497.60 f` BIDIMAN,. MYRON L. ALICE M .46AC D 9355 SW EDGEWOOD ST OOPR - 0 3X DISCOUNT 14:93- X9355 SW EDGEWOOD ST ZONE = R.-7 TAXABLE ZONE 32,000 CURRENT TAX 482.67 4,' TIGARD OR 9722233 2.512DC 00200 PCA. 1.012 DIST:: 023-74 D 23 78 LAND 20,000 AD VALOREM 589.21 KEY 00468434. CTL.:2250 LOC:9325 EDGEWOOD ST SW JV:00000 MAP: 00PR BLD-VAL 9,900 STATE PAID 142.93 UT1: UT2: ;1REA.:EF56 ROLL SEQ: 61393 *ASSESSED 29,900 NET TAX 446.28 SCOTT:,. MARK A Mf7517` 68843 00 1 DVA LOT PT 16 BLOCK OOPR 0 3% DISCOUNT 13.39 - 9325 SWEDGEWOOD EDGEWOOD 0 9325 SW EDGEWOOD ST TAXABLE 28,700 CURRENT TAX 432.89 TIGARD OR 97223 .48AC ZONE = R-7 SALE 0978 78042238 I WD 0_ r 2S12DC 00201 PCA: 1002 DIST: 023-7. 23 78 LAND 500 AD VALOREM 10.30 KEY 0046B443 CTL:2250 LOC: JV:00000 MAP: OOPR *ASSESSED 500 NET TAX 10.30 UTI: UT2: AREA:EF56 ROLL SEQ: 61394 TAXABLE 500 3Z DISCOUNT .31 SCOTT. MARK A. .r13AC ZONE = R-7 CURRENT TAX 9.99 9325 SW EDGEWOOD SALE 0978 78042238 V WD 11 ' TIGARD OR 97223 1 2S12DC 00201 PCA:, 1012 DIST: 023-74 D LAND 20,000 AD VALOREM 839.66 _ --- --- -__ ,.,..r ......,.. r r.n I . .. II.: _' - I I. '-•ID 170.00 L i%j to,, t......,-1.t. u i _ Pa BOX 2339? LE SA 1:082: 8-3000970 v WD C TIGARD OR 97223 2512E`? 0.0200' PCA:. 2012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 25,800 AD VALOREM 771.92 KEY: 004681:12 CTL: LOC:9275 HILL ST SW: JV:83931 MAP: 00011 BLD-VAL 13,400 NET TAX 771.92 kit 8UUTT-_ UT2 AREA:ZCOT ROLL SEQ: 61360 *ASSESSED 39,200 3% DISCOUNT 23.16 PACIFIC FRONTIEFt WOOD- RNHAM TRACT 3.04AC TAXABLE 37,600 CURRENT TAX 748.76 MARKETS 9275 SW HILL ST SALE 1079 79042027 I. WD Q *** DELINQUENT TAXES *** 950E Sit BARBUR BLVD # 300 I It PORE: AND OR 97219 : 2S12DB 00201 PCA: 1.002 DIST: 023-74 23 74 LAND 18,200 AD VALOREM 359.31 .; lit ': KEY:= 00463121: CTL LOC JV:86045 MAP: NOOPR *ASSESSED 18,200 NET TAX 359.31 U 1: U.T2: AREA:EF56 ROLL SEQ: 61361 TAXABLE. 17 500 3X DISCOUNT 10.78 3 AT WOOD.. CORPORATION LOT PT 7 BLOCK - 1.26 AC CURRENT TAX 348.53 33 SW 3RD BURNHAM- TRACT SALE 0280 80006921 V BS L *** DELINQUENT TAXES *** PORTLAND= OR 97204= 2SI2DH: 00202 PCA:= 100 2° DIST:: 023-74 23 74 LAND 14,300 AD VALOREM 281.26 ,v.e • KEY: 00468130 CTL. LOC.: JV:15113• MAP: NOOPz *ASSESSED 14,300 NET TAX 281.26 - : UT1's UT2. AREA:EF56 ROLL SEQ: 61362 TAXABLE 13,700 3% DISCOUNT 8.44 ; - -J: A: ATWOOD CORPORATION .66AC *-R************t****¢******* CURRENT TAX 272.82 33 SGT-THIRD AV CO 39984 7/12184 CODE CHANGE 23-20 TO 23-74 *** DELINQUENT TAXES *b* f PORTLAND= OR 97204, CO 35399 6I14/82. CODE CHANGE, 23-74 TO 23-20 B` OF E REC 81-82. SALE 0000 10700001 ` 2S12a B 00203 PCA: 1012. DIST:. 023-74 23 74 -___`___•d._-..•_" `LAND 28,600 AD VALOREM ---.- -2,065._31 . - = KEY-:: 00468149' CTL: LOC: 9303- HILL ST S4 JV:30663 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 76,200 NET TAX 2,065.31 UTI: UTZ:: AREA:EF56 ROLL SEQ: 61363- *ASSESSED 104,800 3X DISCOUNT 61.96 -ANDERSON,= HARVEY R .23AC PT LOT 7 BUR1=1HAP': TRACTS TAXABLE. 100,600 CURRENT TAX 2,003.35 61-0 SEA BROADWAY SALE 1181 82029025 BS F ATTN BRIAN BJORNSEN PORTLAND OR 97205. ',. ;:,,,c, 2512D0 00204- PCAr 1012: DIST:: 023-74 23 74 LAND 28,600 AD VALOREM 2,.104.36 KEYS 01086666 CTL:: LOC:: 9339= HILL ST SW: JVi:30664 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 78,200 NET TAX 2,104.36 • UM UT2: AREA.:EF56: ROLL SEQ: 61364 *ASSESSED 106,800 3% DISCOUNT 63.13 • i&ERSON,_ HARVEY R .-I1AC PT LOT 7. BURNHAMM TRACTS TAXABLE 102,500 CURRENT TAX 2,041.23 = 610 SW BROADWAY SALE 1182 82029025 BS F PORTLAND' OR, 97205 2512DB- 00291 PCA: 1002 DIST-:-023-:-74 23 74 LAND- - __1O0.AD VALOREM 2.08 i•:. KEY:, 00468-158: CTL': LOC: JV:69020 MAP: NOOPR *ASSESSED 100 NET TAX -2.08 - )' X'=: UTT:a UT2: AREA:EF56 ROLL SEQ: 61365 TAXABLE 100 3% DISCOUNT .06 • PRUITT,= ARTHUR J MARY E LOT PT 5 BLOCK .01AC CURRENT TAX 2.02 91O 3 ALDER: FREUINGS ORCHARD TRACTS SALE 0000 09500154 *** DELINQUENT TAXES *** CUNDEE OR. 97115 2S12DB; 00300 PCA: 7002 DIST: 023-74 23 74 LAND i ----35,600 AD VALOREM 702.11 RGi INDEX 4-. 4.f i-i - - • - - __ - - A: 2SI2CD 01000 B- 251200 01800 C 2512CD- 02300 :. _ . '= -�.f. " , - = - •• - - t D= 2S12CD' 02605 _ E 2S12CD 0261.1 ': F 2S12CD 02705 - :_ . _ t - _ " . . - ~ - , .. ._ u• 2S12CD• 02711 _ ;; � � . z - i. - ' . H: 2S12CD 02803 ,. r x - • 4: I 2S12CD 03002 J: 2S12CD 03700- 3 K. 2S12CD' 0430a .---:-.- s :. P - - _ _ � ' ^- _' 1 7S17DA 00501 = - r: -;,,S - - -, - . Y'3 _ - 1 2.S12AD 02100 PCA.: 3012 DIST: 023-74 LAND 388,200 AD VALOREM 9,468.42 KEY 00462190= CTL LOC: JV:00000 MAP: 00002 BLD-VAL 92,200 NET TAX 9,468.42- UTI: UT2.: AREA:Y-2 ROLL SEQ: 60699 *ASSESSED 480,400 3% DISCOUNT 284.05 CAMP,- VAN STANIVOORD 4.69AC ***********************a*** TAXABLE 461,200 CURRENT TAX 9,184.37 %. TIGARD :WATER DIS1 R1CT X TIGARD WATER DISTRICT 7/84 84025846 880€-7 SV 57TH AVE CAMP, VAN S 7/84 - 84025845 PORTLAND OR 97219 CO 39984 7/11/84" CODE CHANGE 23-20 TO 23-74 B OF E SIC 8/5/83 CO 35399 6/14/82 CODE CHANGE 23-74 TO 23-20 SALE 0784 84025846 I CT M 2512AD 02200_, PCA 2012 DIST: 023-74 D LAND 456,000 AD VALOREM 34,642.33 J ir. KEY. 00462207 CTL:5000. LOC:8880 BURNHAM: ST SW JV:70597 MAP: 00008 BLD-VAL 1301,700 NET TAX 34,642.33 UT1: UT2 AREA:ZTC ROLL. SEQ: 60700 *ASSESSED 1757,700 3% DISCOUNT 1,039.27 THE ROBERT RANtALL- COMPANY 5.51AC 8880 SW BURNHAM ST TAXABLE 1687.400..CURRENT TAX 33,603.06 9509= SW BARBURF BLVD SALE 0000 CF001824 I PORTLAND : OR 97219 2S12AD 0240 t PGA:: 2002 DIST:: 023-74 LAND 14,000 AD VALOREM 275.11 KEY`: 0046221; CTL: LOC:. JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR *ASSESSED 14,000 NET TAX 275.11 : JT1:: UT2: AREA:•ZTC ROLL SEQ: 60701 TAXABLE 13,400 3X DISCOUNT 8.25 DANIELS.- ROt•LAND J" AND .15AC **i-************************ CURRENT TAX 266.86 GERALD L AN CO 39984 7/111/84 CODE CHANGE 23-20 TO 23-74 WIGGINS,, HAL C AA 83-15334 8/9/83 AC CORR +.01AC PO-BOX 23454,_- LESS .16AC TO TL. 3000 ADD .05AC; FROM IL 3000 TIGARD OR 97223 CO 35399 ' -6/14/82' -- -.CODE-CHANGE 23-74-TO 23720----____ SALE. 1279 80000609 V BS U .- ----- v._ -- - __ -_,-.. - .. _. 2S12AD (2500: PCA: 2012 DIST 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 19,300 AD VALORE;I 833.51 KEY: 00462225 CTL: LOC:8940 BURNHAM ST SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 23,000 NET TAX 833.51 UT1: UTZ:- AREA:ZTC ROLL SEQ:: 60702 *ASSESSED 42,300 3% DISCOUNT 25.01 DANIELS!, UIGGINS, -12AC. 8940 Std BURNHAM ST TAXABLE 40,600 CURRENT TAX 808.50 DANI.ELL= CONTRACTORS SALE 0000 11530433 PQ- BOX123454 TIGARD:- OR 97223 __ 2S12Ai) 02600 PCA:-" 2012. DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 84,300 AD VALOREM 4,151.15 KEY0)0462234 CTL: LOC:8950 BURNHAM ST SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 126,300 NET TAX 4,151.15 UT1::1 UTZ: AREA:ZTC ROLL 5E0 60703 *ASSESSED 210,600 3% DISCOUNT 124.53 DANIELS WIGGINS DANIELS- .-56AC 8950 SW BURNHAM ST TAXABLE 202,200 CURRENT TAX 4,026.62 P O/BOX 23454 - - - - T•ICiRD OR 97223 I' ( c- "' °� 100 AD VALOREM 2,849.58 42.QD 02700 PCA: ?012 DIST- 023-74 D 23 74 LAND �:, Kr:fr 00462243 CTL:4551 LOC:8970 BURNHAM SW JV:00000 MAP:- NOOPR. BLD-VAL 73,500 NET TAX 2,849.58 UilZ UTZ:- AREA:ZTC ROLL SEQ-: 60704 *ASSESSED 144,600 3% DISCOUNT 85.49 ALLEN RCHARD L .40AC 8970 SW. BURNHAM TAXABLE 138.800 CURRENT TAX 2,764.09 MILLER,. RICHARD L SALE 0179 79001281- I Cr G '..w,675= SW PINE ST 'PORTLAND OR 97223 2512AD 02800 PCA: 9152 DIST: 023-74 23 74 *ASSESSED 0 a i' KETt 00462252. CTL: LOC:' JV:55912 MAP: NOOPR UT1: UTZ: AREA: ROLL SEQ: 60705 CITY OF TIGARD LOT PT 5 BLOCK .34AC 3725 SW 106TH BURNHAM RACT NON-ASSESSABLE BEAVERTON OR 97005 SALE 0000- 09400231 2S12AD 02900 PCA: 2012 DIST: 023-74 D A3 LAND 38,500 *TIGRDELSW 144.90 KE`f: 00462261 CTL LOC:12770 ASH ST SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR. BLD-VAL 2,400 AD VALOREM 806.84 UTi:: UTZ: 144.90: AREA:?TC ROLL SEQ: 60706 *ASSESSED 40,900 SPEC ASSMT 144.90 vC=CCD uttt T 151: mimorC _23AC ****-*r*******-****"*********** TAXABLE 39,300 NET TAX 951.74_ -- -- -.,-_ . 41, nn Tar _n4crn u�T 7A 55 ._. - - t KEY: 04462252: CTL: LOC: J-V:55912 MAP: NOOPR: UT1t- UT2:: AREA:- ROLL SEQ: 60705 CITY' OF TIGARD= LOT PT 5 BLOCK .34AC - 3725 SV! 106TH: BURNHAM] TRACT NON-ASSESSABLE BEAVERTON OR 97005 SALE 0000` 09400231 2S12AD 0290(1 PCA: 2012 DIST: 023-74 D A3 LAND- 38,500 *TIGRDELSW 144.90 , KEYt 00462261 CTL: LOC:-12770 ASH ST Su JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 2,400 AD VALOREM 806.84 • UT1- UTZ: 144.:90 AREA:-°LTC ROLL SEQ: 60706 *ASSESSED 40,900 SPEC ASSMT 144.90 KEEFER._ WILLIAM, MAURICE .23AC **********##*:t****t#####*** TAXABLE 39,300 NET TAX 951.74 MARION CLARA, CO' 39984 7/12/84 CODE CHANGE 23-20 TO 23-74 UT2 144.90 3% DISCOUNT 28.55 12555 SW HART ROAD -CO-35399- 6/14/82 - - CODE CHANGE 23-74_T0 23-20_ CURRENT TAX 923.19 BEAVERTON OR 97005 - - " -***"DELINQUENT_DELINQUENT TAXES *** 2512AD -030M PCA:. 9152 DIST:. 02.3-74 *ASSESSED 0 - KET: 0046227Q CTL: LOC: JV:00000 MAP:. NCOPR . (......... J T1t.. UT2: AREA:: ROLL SEQ: 60707 . GARD;. CITIt OF 3..15AC NON-ASSESSABLE L BOX; 23397' SALE 0000 03840359 I:GARD OR 97223= 2S128A 00100 PCA:- 1012: DIST:: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND- 22,00€ AD- VALOREM 987.52 - .`KETt 00462289 -° CTL LOC:11975 95TH_-AVE_.ti�,4,�.. S j .JV:00000, _ MAP: OOPR BLD-VAL 2P,100 STATE PAID 170.00 1_ .= •. . • �..,"KS•aYY- UTT. UT2. AREA.KN44= ROIL SEQ.: 60708 *ASSESSED `a' 50,100-NET-TAX r.--------817.52= -- n- -- KELLER.- EVA. 6: .31AC D 11975 Sid 95TH AVE 00PR. 0 3% DISCOUNT 24.53 1:1975 5L: 95TH. AVE ZONE R-7 TAXABLE 48.100 CURRENT TAX 792.99 : TIGARD= OR 97223 2S12BA_ 00200: PCA:- 7012 DIST: 023-74 D- 23 74 LAND 91,200 AD VALOREM 1,831.26 - KEY: 00462298 CTL:= LOC:12045 95TH- AVE SW JV;00000 MAP:- 00010 °,0-VAL 1,700 NET TAX 1,831.26 UTI UT2t AREA:-X-2 ROLL SRI: 60709 =ASSESSED 92,900, 31 DISCOUNT 54.94 FISEMCO. INC 2.04AC *************************** TAXABLE 89.200 CURRENT TAX 1.776:32-- 9442 SLt BARBUR BLVD- #6 EISEMCO,. INC 3/84 - 84008237 PORTLAND= OR 97219= SALE 01.80 80003641 I CT Q- 2S12BA 00300. - PCA: 3002 DIST: 023=74 23 74 LAND 3,900 AD VALOREM 75.96 KEY:: 00462305= CTL.:- LOC: JV:-72707 MAP:. NOOPR *ASSESSED 3.900 NET TAX 75.96 ` UT1 UT2:. AREA:-Y-2 ROLL SEQ: 60710 TAXABLE 3,700 3%' DISCOUNT 2.28 g: GRAY,. a A CO. LOT PT 21 -` BLOCK 1.3OAC _ - -- -- - - - - . • _ CURRENT TAX 73.68 P= 0. BOX 235.16 LOT PT 22 BLOCK N TIGARDVILLE ADD AMENDED ..T IGARO OR 97223 ZONE = M-4 SALE 0000 100604 57 S12BA: 00301= PCA:= 3012 DIST:. 023-74 23 74 LAND 92,000 AD VALOREM 10,852.15 Kett 00462314, CTL: LOC: JV:72708 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 458.600 NET TAX 10,852.15 Lint.: UTZ= AREA:Y-2 ROLL SEQ: 60711 *ASSESSED 550,600 3X DISCOUNT 325.56 r BENTLEY.: JOHN R LOT PT 21 BLOCK 1.28AC TAXABLE 528.600 CURRENT TAX 10,526.59 j GRAM, R A: TRUSTEES LOT PT 22 BLOCK N TIGARDVILLE ADD AMENDED i PO: BOX: 23516 ZONE = M-4 SALE 0000 08670272. - - TIGARD: OR 97223 I *** *********[4*****f_- ***#*lttit***#*##1r**##*##*#[*##*###Ar#frfik k**#***#*************st##s:*********##************************ ******* MARKET 55564475.-900 MARKET 5556.475,900 LAND 1900,084,600 BLD 3656,391,300 SP-FEAT BASE•OT 5323918000.00° BASE-02 350210_00- - BASE-03- 293047.00- BASE-04 53535.00 BASE-OS 197993.00 • BASE-06 595455.00 BASE-07 00 BASE-O8 .00 BASE-09 .00 BASE-10 .00 ' AD VALOREM 1118.343,67.7.59 STATE PAID 5,919,875..86 SPEC ASSMT 5,598,874.00 NET TAX 118,022.675.73 3% DISCOUNT 3.540,684.38 CURRENT TAX11:4.48T.991•35 • 1 • ; -- ; - -- 0(3A PCA: 9822. DIST: 023-74 *ASSEStD v /— . KEY:, 0.1265320: CTL: LOCI: JY:00000 MAP: NCOPR UTI� �2� AREA ROLL SEQ: 60644 CROP, CAROL L TRUSTEE BURNHAM TRACT LOT 4 T TIGARD-. CITY OF 4.-71AC NON—ASSESSABLE PORTION -5' BM' 23397 SALE 0000 09570841 TIGARD OR 97223 2S1ZAC 00200 PCA: 2012 DIST: 023-74 LAND 154,300 AD VALOREM 5,372.70 KEY: 0046-1681 CTL: LOC:: JV:00001 MAP N©OPR. BLD—VAL 118,300 NET TAX 5,372.70 UT1 r UTZ:, AREA:ITC ROLL SEQ: 60645 *ASSESSED 272,600 3X DISCOUNT 161.18 id STEVENS PAGE N` 2..91AC *.*ft***********tt*t***t*._*** TAXABLE 261,700 CURRENT TAX 5,211.52 '_ 9180' SW BURNHAM ROAD CO' 39984 7/11/84 CODE CHANGE 23-20 TO 23-74 `TIGARD -- OR 97221 STEVENS., PAGE. N 6/83 — 83022548 CO 35399 6/14/82 CODE CHANGE 23-74-TO 23-20 - _ _. ._ . -__- SALE 0979 78031196 I CT 0 2S12AC 00201 PCA. 2002 DIST: 023-74 23 74 LAND 26,900 AD VALOREM 529.69 KEY: 01161986 CTL: LOC:, JV:26996 MAP: NOOPR *ASSESSED 26,900 NET TAX 529.69 UT-1=:: UT2`: AREA:ITC° ROLL SEO: 60646 TAXABLE 25.800 3X DISCOUNT 15.89 14,A1N STREET LAND I47AC LOT 3 BURNHAM TRACT CURRENT TAX 513.80 '• ZORPORATION° SALE 1081 81034700 V BS U *** DELINQUENT TAXES *** 10505 SW BARBUR BLVD #303 PORTLAND OR 97219 2512AC 0020 — • 2 _- POA: 2012 DIST:_ 023-74= = 23 -74 ---- ,. LAND _ 160,300 AD VALOREM 7,674.13 KEY: 01.195860 CTL: LOC:= JV:2.6996 MAP: NOOPR— BLD=VAC-- 229,1 00—NET TAX —7,674.13-. ..z. UTi: UTZ:. AREA:ITC ROLL SEQ:; 60647 *ASSESSED 389,400 3% DISCOUNT 230.22 SOUTHWEST PORTLAND 1.26AC PT LOT 3 BURNHAM TRACT TAXABLE 373,800 CURRENT TAX 7,443.91 PARTNERSHIP SALE 0480 80026996 WD 2.12.1 N COLUMBIA BLVD PORTLAND- OR 97217 2STZAC 00203` PCA: 9152 DIRT: 023-74 23 74 *ASSESSED 0 KEY:. 01195879- CTL: LOC: JV:26999 MAP: NOOPR UTI:° UT2:: AREA: ROLL SEQ: 60648 CITY Of TIGARD 1..7-IAC PT LOT 3 BURNHAM TRACT PO'BOX. 23397 NON—ASSESSABLE SALE 0780 80026999 WD 12420 SST'MAIN TIGARD= OR 97223 2S12AC 00300 PCA: 9492 DIST: 023-74 -- 23— 74 *ASSESSED - 0 is KEY: 0046/690 CTL: LOC: JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR }T1 UT2: AREAL ROLL SEa F 60649 UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY .01AC BY R&D 72-09 150 N FIRST NON—ASSESSABLE SALE 0000 00CF1221 HILLSBORO OR 97123 2S12AC 00400 PCA:: 2012. DIST:: 023-74 LAND 63,400 AD VALOREM 1,268.77 KEY 0046170? CTL: LOC: JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD—VAL 1,000 NET TAX 1,268.77 UT1t UT2: AREA:ITC ROLL SEQ: 60650 *ASSESSED 64,400 3X DISCOUNT 38.06 - DOL.AN JOHN I FLORENCE .43AC ****t ****m**#********** TAXABLE 61,800 CURRENT TAX 1,230.71 . ?` ?344 SE FOSTER RD CO 39984 7/11/84 CODE CHANGE 23-20 TO 23-74 PORTLAND OR 97206 CO 35399 6/14/82 CODE CHANGE 23-74 TO 23-20 SALE 0000 10370375 2S12AC U0500 PCA: 2012 DIST:. 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 90,300 AD VALOREM 3,769.30 , KEY:. 00461716 CTL: LOC:12940 MAIN SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD—VAL 100,900 NET TAX 3,769.30 UT1: UT2: AREA:ITC ROLL SEQ: 60651 *ASSESSED 191,200 3X DISCOUNT 113.08 TIGARD. CURTIS C JULIA E .34AC 12940 SW MAIN TAXABLE 183,600 CURRENT TAX 3,656.22 1i WOODARD. CHARLES L AND SALE 0881 81030535 I CT Q- - at” IC _ k _ .! - I. f ARLIE L F' PO BOX 23303 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S12AC 00600 PCA: 201:2 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 33,200 AD VALOREM 1,108.62 KEY: 00461725 CILt LOC:12500 MAIN- SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD—VAL 23,000 NET TAX 1,108.62 UT1= UT2: AREA:ZTC ROLL SEQ: 60652 *ASSESSED 56,200 3% DISCOUNT 33.26 VER?'iILYE, HOBART P` JEAN ..15AC 12500 SW MAIN TAXABLE 54,000 CURRENT TAX 1,075.36 • 11272 S6U CAPITOL HW i PORTLAND OR 97219 2S:12AC 00700 PCA 2012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 167,500 AD VALOREM 5,165.34 KET: 00461734: CIL: LOC:12520 MAIN SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD—VAL 94,600 NET TAX 5,165.34 I I1_: UT2:= AREA.:ZTC ROLL SEQ: 60653 *ASSESSED 262,100 3X DISCOUNT 154.96 MAN'. JOHN T" 1.67AC 12520 SW MAIN TAXABLE 251,600 CURRENT TAX 5,010.38 4025 SE BPOOKLYM SALE 0582 82011414 I VD L PORI_.LANEY - 02 97202 2S12AC 00800 PCA: 2012:. DIST: 023-74 D LAND 48,200 AD VALOREM 3,888.39 KEY-. 00461743 CTL: LOC:12551 MAIN- SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD—VAL 149,100 NET TAX 3,888.39 UTi:. UT2: AREA:ZTC ROLL SEQ: 60654 *ASSESSED 197,300 3X DISCOUN 116.65 L UVELHORST� MICHAEL J .23AC 12551 & 12555 SU MAIN TAXABLE Std' MAIN= ST 189,400 CURRENT TAX 3,771x.74 KADEY',- GEORGE S= JR. [2551` SALE t 281 81005234 I CT Q *** DELINQUENT TAXES *#* TIGARD OR 97223 I; f 2S12AC 00900 PCA: 2012 DIST": 023--74 D 23 74— . LAND 36,600 AD VALOREM 1,7389 •1 KEY: 00"461-752 CTL..- LOC:12571 MAIN SW JV:00000 �RMA 8° P: NOOPRf' "BLD-VAL'" -- 5'1;600T-NET TAX- ._1,738-,89.. __ UTY: UT2:{ AREA:ZTC ROLL SEO: 60655 *ASSESSED 88,200 3% DISCOUNT 52.17 I; EUGENE L VIVIAN DAVIS, EUGENE ._- 12AC 12571 Std MAIN TAXABLE 84,700 CURRENT TAX 1,686.72 . 1 4550-= SW" LOMBARD SALE 0000 08030852: = BEAVERTON OR 97005 "1- 2ST2AC 0 1000- PCA: 2012 DIST:. 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 24,000 AD VALOREM 743.17" KEY: 00461761 CIL:: LOC:12575 MAIN ° SW JV:00000 MAP: 00008" BLD-VAt 13,700- NET TAX 743.17 UT1.: UT2:: AREA:ZT-C ROLL SEQ:. 60656 *ASSESSED 37,700 3X DISCOUNT 22.30 HOFFARBER: PROPERTIES- ..03AC ****************#*#******** TAXABLE 36,200 CURRENT TAX 720.87 12005 Sot HALL BLVD CO 39984 7/11/84 CODE CHANGE 23-20 TO 23-74 TIGARD° OR 97225 HOFFARBER PROPERTIES 1/84 — 84001931 C0: 35399 6/14/82 CODE CHANGE 23-74 TO 23.2.0 *****#*#************:*##*****-**7***t!###k#i�#****#fr****M*******************k****4*3+**tt**3***#fr***** *******Mit********t4#isiti********* MARKET 5546 251 300 MARKET 5546 251: 300 LAND 1895,668,500 BLD 3650,582,800 SP-FEAT BASE—01 531411'020Q_00 BASE-02 350210 00 BASE-03 292079.00 BASE-04 53535.00 BASE-05 197993.00 BASE-06 595455.00 BASE-07 .00 BASE-08 .00 BASE.-09 .00 BASE-10 .00 AD= VALOREM 118 .142,323.30 STATE. PAID 5.918,875,.47 SPEC ASSMT 5,597,901.95 NET TAX 117,821,349.78 3% DISCOUNT 3,534.644.61 CURRENT TAXII4,286=,.705.,17 r-- ROLL: PARCEL NUMBER ORDER U A: S' H' I H G T 0 N, C 0' U- N T Y PROPERTY VALUES FOR 1984-85 REAL PROPERTY 10/16/84 PAGE 4403 ROLL—CONTROL _ __2c1�ac _-nt--nn ._-___.PCA: 201-2 DIST: 023-74 D LAND 45,900 AD VALOREM 2,894.73 . - - -- • - _ .. a #. , - - -. _ 2.894.73 _ i ROLL PARCEL NUMBER ORDER W A. S H I N G- T O N C O U N T Y PROPERTY VALUES FOR, 1984-85 REAL PROPERTY 10/16/84 PAGE 4403 ROLL-CONTROL. 2S12AC 0 1100 PCA: 2012 DIST: 023--74 D LAND 45,900 AD VALOREM 2,894.73 KEY:. 00461770 CTL: LOC:12566 MAIN SW JV:00000 MAP:_ NOOPR BLD-VAL 101,000 NET TAX 2,894.73 UT1t UTZ:: AREA:LTC ROLL SEQ 60657 *ASSESSED 146,900 3% DISCOUNT 86.84 1 SORG,, OTTO .68AC ASSESSABLE PORTION TAXABLE 141,000 CURRENT TAX 2,807.89 14865 Si 72ND 12566--12568 SW MAIN SALE 0682 82014391 I WD L TIGARD OR 97223 _ 2S12ACi 0.1100 HA PCAr 9822 DIST`: 023-74 *ASSESSED 0 _ r KEY: 01265295 C.TLt LOCF 12566, MAIN SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR k,,,, Uii UT2:: AREA: ROLL SEQ: 60658 . CRG : OTTO .68AC NON-ASSESSABLE PORTION ^Y TIGARD, CITY OF S ALE 0682 82014391. L PO°BOX. 2339-7--- TIGARD- OR 97223 Y-• _ PCA:_2012 DIST: 023-74 D 23 74 LAND 83,300 AD VALOREM 2,989.16 25-12AC. 0:1=t01�,�-..:t _ KEY: 00461789 CTL: LOCi12562 'i�AI . SW JV:00000- MAP: NOOPR. BLD-VAL .. 68.400_NET TAX_ 2,989.16 z= \UT1: U'TZ:' AREA:ZTC. ROLL. SEQ 60659 *ASSESSED 151,700 3% DISCOUNT -89.67- . ULLE.T, JOHN_ R= LOIS I 1.00AC 12562 SW MAIN TAXABLE 145,600 CURRENT TAX 2,899.49 4095 SU HARGIS. RD' _I- BEAVERTON OR 97005 2SI2AC 01200 PCA: 2012 DIST 023-74 D A3 LAND 196,300 *TIGRDELSW 356.60 KEY.: 00461798 CTL LOC:12580 MAIN Sw JV:28076 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 14.3oa AD VALOREM 4.151.15 Ull: UT2.: 356.60 AREA:ZTC: ROLL SEQ 60660 *ASSESSED 210,600 SPEC' ASSMT 356.60 MAIN STREET LAND 1.45AC *************************** TAXABLE - 202,200- NET TAX 4,5O715 CORPORATION CO 39984 7/11/84 CODE CHANGE 23-20 TO 23-74 UT2 356.60 3X DISCOUNT 135.23 10505 SW BARBUR BLVD #303 C0= 35399 6/14/82 CODE CHANGE 23-74 TO 23-20 CURRENT TAX 4,372.52. PORTLAND- OR 9721.9. SALE 1.081: 81034700 I B5 U *** DELINQUENT TAXES *** 2S12AC 01300 PCA: 2002 DIST: 023-74 D A3 LAND 145,300 *TIGRDELSW 143.38 KEY:. 00461805 CTL LOCz12600 MAIN SW- JV:.00000 _ . _MAP: 00004 *ASSESSED 145,300 AD VALOREM 2,863.97 UTT: UT2: 143.38 AREA:ZTC ROLL. SEQ: 60661 TAXABLE -- 139;500-SPEC ASSMT 143.,38- t COMMERCE INVESTMENT, INC .90AC +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ UT2 143.38 NET TAX 3,007.35 jj `-`-31OO 1ST INTERSTATE TOWER COMMERCE INVESTMENT, INC 9/84 - 84035526 3X DISCOUNT 90.22 PORTLAND OR 97201 CO 39984 7/11/84 CODE CHANGE 23-20 TO 23-74 CURRENT TAX 2,917-03 - _ CO 35399 6/14/82. CODE CHANGE 23-74 TO 23-20 *** DELINQUENT TAXES *** SALE 1081 81034699 CT U 2SI2AC 01 400 PCA.: 2012. DIST:. 023-74 D A3 LAND 35,000 *TIGRDELSW 143.47 KEY: 0046.1814 CTL: LOC:.12620 MAIN SW JV:.00000 MAP: NOOPR BLD-VAL 50,400 AD VALOREM 1,683.46 • . q = UT1: UT2: 143.47 AREA:ZTC ROLL SEQ: 60662 *ASSESSED 85.400 SPEC ASSMT 143.47 MAIN STREET LAND .11AC 12620 SW MAIN TAXABLE - 82,000 NET TAX 1,826.93 CORPORATION SALE 1081 81034700 I BS U UT2 143.47 3% DISCOUNT 54..81 10505 SW BARBUR BLVD #303 CURRENT TAX 1,772..12 PORTLAND OR 97219 *** DELINQUENT TAXES *** 2S12AC 01500 PEA: 2002 DIST: 023-74 D A3 LAND 388,700 *TIGRDELSW 119.80. KEY: 00461823 CTL: LOC:12640 MAIN SW JV:22569 MAP: NOOPR *ASSESSED 388,700 AD VALOREM 7,661.78 UTT UT2: 119.-80 AREA:ZTC ROLL SEQ: 60663 TAXABLE 373,200 SPEC ASSMT 119.80" MAIN STREET LAND COMPANY 4.-02AC ************#***#******k*** UT2- 119.80 NET TAX 7,781.58 X MAIN STREET LAND CORP CO` 39984 7/1.1/84 CO 35399 6/14/82 3% DISCOUNT 233..45 10505 SWr BARBUR BLVD #303 CODE CHANGE 23-20 TO 23-74 CODE CHANGE. 23-74 TO 23-20 CURRENT TAX 7,548.13 . t_ PORTLAND OR 97219 SALE 1081 81034699 CT U *** DELINQUENT TAXES *** 2SI2AC 01600. PCA: 2002 DIST: 023-74 D A3 LAND 111,600 *TIGRDELSW ' 63.90 g • KEY: 00461832 CTL: LOC:12690 PACIFIC HWY SW JV:00000 MAP: NOOPR *ASSESSED 111.,600 AD VALOREM 2,198.79 I giTl.. UtT?: 63..90 AREA•ZTC ROLL SEQ: 60664 TAXABLE 1Q7g10.0 SPEC ASSMT 63.90 • r"— - .__ _...,..________________ . •. r . ".. ,• - ,_ .. _ ..•" . , • , . '.•• . . '1 I' ■ 1 1,,,, , , ■ 'II\"..!Xi V . \\., , \,\ : . +"LI:t,44, . . , . , . r 7 ,';., ,,:::„,., wc,,, _ •,,1, . 0■, '''.*:it—s':-'"^:'...st'.'",—'1,f1 1 i Ott . . . 04 . J , ', '. f.,(- .• 4..,r ... ',, ,,,,,,,,,,, ,. ■+.-,,,-. 'try,.'''.‘!,,..a, i )11. .■ ' \,,,,\•,,,,,- '4.1,---., ,-At --,-._,:•.,- .,,tF.. ..."or - r''s k k,.,t '''''''''''-:''''',' ".:■,.,''''''''.".'...) riCA ... '..,.,";,,•.,, CV N 1' . \'• rt...""-"i°4"'''' ' rti •..,1,,.,. - e\ t E-i rri b) I' 1 . •ta, 4J0 , 0 ,,, . Pc 1 . •P pq riz:$ . ... $.4 bl 4 ff.$ I (2.----SL.." ----) 0 ii'-i-1 , • \ 1 , . \ 1 . . i . . 1 .• 1 . 1 1 l‘s Ina , ,...., 4 X 0 . II .. !, . °)4 < ■ , ,1 • . 4.4.4.4. Will F' . 1 V r 31 44 . . . . —^.....7777•77.......m., , . .. _ . . , . . . . ., . . , .. ,, .....,., -..--..-.--..,-_....-.. .. •..- _. _..........,.. , . . ,', . . , . , ..," .." , , .. ,.;;=-'' ,,,,,-„;,:,,%f"" . (•: ,,,,i,•;„ '', CITY__ _ ',,,,„,:', _ RH,Tp. -i'F T 1 G A (-,:,, kt.,_ , , 5 . ,,r„ '4.:::-:', ''',,,,..1•,/A.,,,t, ,,,L.„, . . „.,,-,4't . 1.2755 S,W. ASH . • . ,.„, .: . 0-- 1.t, .. . . . . , .,„.,"., ,,.., P.0,‘BOX 23397 , . , . TIGARD,OR, 97223 ("?0 . . . ., ..., .,. , 1 . . . . . , . z. . . . .... i, , . . ' . Sorg, Otto - _ . „ ,,.. 4. . , . . . . , '., . \ I 1. . ' . .. CITY OF TIGARD ' 12755 S.W. ASH ., ,. ....,.... .. i... . ).: , (1 f„.,,,,,... ,,,,,,, ,-,.... : .,.. , . RO: BOX 23397 Lk . , : 47:6, 4 '.. ! 4,,,, . .-!..o..0--,1..1,Ik5:,Titi:/ii , ,;.,- . . -,, , , , , ,--,, . , ., - TIGARD. OR 97223 , , ' ,104.....'t., . %,P t•.,.teie:,,,t '`•4: ,,„, ,. :'',...ti!1:7I'!*,„'.`, :,'., •• e, 6',..., . - 0, •.-., ,- •,,,,-.",i,,,:.:;.-..!,-,, p.......,—..--t .. c , ‘ t '/' S' ' - ,., .;,. • it 4,; ' .,., • . /7 il gttkrIcr,tmi. -14 Kno ., , ., „P . .. . '/7 11 ,t• ... i '. •C TY OF TIGARD , 12755 S,W, ASH ,.. i, . . . P,O, 'BOX 23397 , ' ft . „., .. , . ' ... TIGARD,OR.,, 97223 1 , . 1 „ .. ., . .. ' . . . : . . i .. , . . . .. q . 4 3 3 •001_,.,,r ,, 1 ..■I, . ., I . . I, 4:40..,cidit:ItUt'.R,.0.A(','t:J'..1: . , , . ., • Lynn \ . , :\ , . • 'Keith C• Et ,.._ (--\) ,\ 0.vori, • ,, title \,,, 4. • CITY- OP TIGARD , , nh . „ 12755 SW ASH *...... ,,,..... ., .. • . ,.." „.,I,P0 ,, • P.0,, 80,X 23397, , . , i , . . ,.,. ,...,,,,, ....„,:,,,,, .. TIGARD, OR, )7223 .,,,...,-;-" N '' .,„,t .1.''4, , . , .',. " 4. ..' '; _,,,, ' ''. ''')'+''''• •. I' • 14F"'''' . , ..t. ..,. ,. ,. . Ili , ; i i• .. . ,. • \ S . • •.... • ,.. . ,, 1. ' to, • < ',..S .. •. ttotopez,o. '.„i•itti •,,,, . txtiotn , 7',.. ovo8on Xoith C & Lynh.t. :: 1 • , „ ,.. S, • 13160 8w A8 h Alteritie .. .t, • , TIgatdi Oregon 97223 ; A aiptedom et .,...,..:kr. :,1 , T, .• , -. ,,.p, 1, ii2, PU 17!.1;11610 23i3 (.,, i , 4 L h ' .„ . a • 6 ..' . • -- . __________ . , . . . . „ . , . . ,' , ,,,, ,,t. •4 . . , • . . . . . . :, CITY OF TIGARD 6.-,, ,.,,./ , . - .,., , .. .. rt L. 12755 S.W.ASH .,4„,,, , \k -,4,/ ,,,,44, .. , ,,, . '',4,4 , • . • ,,..,l'',/ ° . . . P.O. BOX 23397 , 1(>//,,,,--7,, . 4, .. _ TIGARD, OR. 97223 . 'I(' ''' 1„;:, • ee'"'''':1",',', /'''' ',0,, S,>''"':'''',,,,,0 KO f l'',4, ';'''''r \ ,, , , ■ .. ,"' :* ' t 1 VA t .'') -1 ni, /7 it---"<11 ,• ,.) / / tZ„<l)1 ''''"''''' ,,,,,'• . .e/ ;, i/ .. v :.>'' . .., ... e ,, \■ \,i ,,,,'' • .,,,, .401001071i0 U R/V it . l' '''''. .4: i',,,,r' 3 ' ''' ilik TO 4 •. . ,,,, , -. 1 'k . ' • i I • Poertner, Henry EL & , , . , Aibuipte -lot ‘.:::,, ,. . Barbara J. .. . . • 1.3245 SW Burnham CoUrt. .. ....:.... i Oregon 97223 . , Tigard, O ,,,.. - f7.,CS V.32°0311 273 i3 . " . , Grim , Walter M. & . . E94111100erSiteii Hill Street . . • „, ,., . .. ' . :.. ' Tigard/ Oregon f'1, 97223 . , .. .., . . .. , '` i • . ,./ • , . . . . ..,:\ 04/20/ 5 4 , . . t, .. . Pb ' 4.- etes. .,tizi3O„, teVit12.1.NA. ,i. 4 / 1 I!. 24. 6"'"%°41 S* /4.Al -.1.1, , ttb at 4.14 . A , .1-. ,...-IL,14••• 4 ?) ,. . , ' * itIT:41.1.eAi..11111.i .1.1:11 1...1\,'(1:::. 1tti"!:!Ii!lic:tw.k1:1(..):1;,.4) i . LI.:1111, ,, ' 7 7. - , 1) .,. t • , . , .. • .. - FranciScan. Fathers of California ,....2. .,„,. , By St Anthonys Church (1.../' , 12675 SW Pacific Hwy . , ' CITY OP 'VGA IID / 127553W4 ASH , . P.O, BOX 23397 i / TIGARD, OR. 97223 (3 . , , ,_ • , • .,: ... . ,•• . „ • Grimm, Walter Ma & Elmerie J. ,(. 9400 SW Hill Stteet ... Tiqatd, Otegon 5722 ,'S AVA5tStO . -"los 41'5a8I ALE T0 PCMWAPIP 11UIN TO ni1tP 7 - .,.. r, .. .. . , [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] ......41111111111111111111 . . .. , . .. . . . , . , • , . . . . , . •777,,777=1 • it..../....r.,) .,.....,,,,, '--••••! ,......r.,,z,"4,..,; . ,.....,,,\,,,\ , • , , 1 . \ . ; ..... „ Ail tatioto 2:'•-: ;,' ' '. ... 0-••••••. , • . I li .• i '. • 1,1 , • I • . . 40.... , ".."....,,,,,, .....„..... ,, ift.,••• 11141-'' A #041111 Ili , i' '1' , I\ . . , . • . ' , • . 11. ..'. . 111/ ,, ,,....- -- . . . -.- ...._ u -------------- -...,:,-,--'....:.._..--,.=-_.. .......'"■,...._ .. I: Aii•;:.. •,,,,, , . . . -,= =.....;..;......: ,,..•=..........--...,„ --_ • ., i. . I . 'S■ , .. Nif 2 __.„,,,-"-- . .4 . .4• , . . ...... ..N... ... • \ . ,. / .••••■... ■ I' ■ • ■1 ■ '... 1911is '•11■,,, ,, • . . , . 14 . . . ,. . . S.., I, •, ,.. r, , .. . ...... , .. , . ... ,.. < „,„___,,.,. .\ ir • , ....... . ,• i f.K. \ : . • • , . •,,. .4 , , • • , 71-- • . • . 4 , . ,1 ".. . . . , • I 1 ' . 1 ,• r.* . )' .V .. r r . \ \ . . . , . . II ......... ,... .., , , 1,. .1 ., fripet 9, 1 (y) , 0 \ _ . . .. 1111111 , 1.,>,-; N 4. .1 ,,.., \ \ . , . ,.. I 12--t7L1-NI 1.-!; __,. , ,1; • ,) ... r , 'Al: ' Ilk 14 AO -05.r::: ::.---.._,......;::: : .' . .. . . IL.? , • 1 ilit ,..t., . . , . . .. ...., • Illi: , ' I '- ''''''' . ,-Z--- ..-- . \ . : . , . . . .r 1.'......- , ,, .• . . . 1111111k1■ .., I 1 . , ...... \ \ ::: I ..; . / . ..... • 41‘ • ; . I \ , I ..... -iiii .,./..., ..„---- . .,,,,• •., 1, . ...• . , t . ...... „. .. „_. • • ., ,. .... • . ; •. • • .• . ..,__ I. : .,_,., . . . • I /1 . ... . r ... . , A 1.--'"'" . .4 r--- \\\,417/' ..,.., . . . .. • . v. . . ,' •. _..............1 ,... i,. — ..-- —.1 ." .. , .Z '''' ----. ,,., .. . i H1----. -0 . . . . .. . Exist,in 9 \ v. . • , . • ft, ,. I • • 41.';'•,;•-; .,, :„41,..; . . /-: • . - 1-1. . .. ; - • 5 phase S3nal •. . • • .. . - 1 . 1 ••:,•.. . fit. .01. , , 141.4.,....,, to ) k 1 • • . :4: t //' , lig' .4, S' . . \ ,.., - / $_„,-------- f....17'.1 lxj /1„..,,,,,., , N. _ ......._... , ,. --44. . c, i ..--7f .). IS' • ._ ...... . , 'P /7. • '44\ . . ...,,.,.': ,., . .. . . . .• , .111 . . . 9 •. . , , ' I G, 'SI 1 I I\ r : .• • . . , ..... . ., .. if \ -\---- ---.---,....„ , , , . .., 1 1 \ \ ( . I •,..i,. #1, .,. . , I -,, IN ' ' \ . ... , . . . . . , , ,,, . \ . .... 4, , 1 I . ,, I \ . \ )c „.... :. . • ,1 ..1- I ' /A '(% 10.1 . . . e . . . I , ' 1 l‘) .. • • • . --,, •., ,_,,, c) . . y ..-) j. \(''''',.:,\,,,,' 241 wide aiti‘,t.ir,1;_il. i . . / . .. ..., . 7, . . a : 1 \ . ' •• . • .. • .. ' \r,J 1:YI'''''' '... • LI' . . r....., )( /.."'"-.........................., . •, . . fr. - ; ■ _... 0. . ... \ \ • II, . , • .• . . '.,. . . , I ....._ .. i .„ "' -. 0 0 1 .--,,„, ,.. I '',..,,,_ ,_..:''' ,,,,''' \ 0) \ J '. — ,, 1 1 i 1 \ ill'......„ , • ...A Will! <( !, 1: ••!S, .... I . ' . . d'\ 4 • . • . .. ,.. . .• .. . .... . ....„, . _0 \ , . , . \ I T., \ I . „......„,,,, .................__ ............... . . • i . ... , , .. „..... 4, , in --, ____----....__ ,...... it,i i .. ..... . • ( . . . . . li . , . „ "., .. ,,. \ 1 .., , ., . . , , ,.. . , . • . • 1,, . , • , • i . • .,., . .,..., :., .... . .4.. \,•,..:,,,,,• . , .. NI Fil .,, .. , i ..,...„ .. , \ . • : _________ , • 4 t t110 / • . ' '41,'41\ li 0 i .. . 0 1' 1, . 4 •' ■ i i . . e„T , i , 1 i . • . ; ., . ' " 1111 ' 1 i t II .) . 1 . ( -',r7 . RE f NIL ...., . . .. : • . 1 rt. 1 . • • . . '' . . \. . ,: . ' ''• ..4?' 7/ ' 9000 GSF T ____--- -- .iiii6)"1tri:li I....:',. .•.4. . .. . i •• .,.1; • ..(,,•• ) .4ISt. , „. ,,.... //'. t- •,,, 'Ct'' .. , .* 1 1 . .. ....„. / • . , . ,. , . ,..„ t 0 i ., ' 1 \ . . .....„., . t .,, , # .. • . k f`.. ''''......„,.....,,,, , '..1,• ' . , . , ',.' ' 1 7.3 ' • ill* 0 . '''',.,, ,,, '.: 1 ...1.1 ' . . •1:,,s..) .,,A4 ,,,, • . , . / • , , ■ , ,-9. •••••• . , ,,, '-'s •i Of . „ . . 4, 1 4 'A i, , . '' -' * l'1/4 •I. ..... . , • r I\i ' \ . • ., '•, ... . • , . .,,. '14\''\\ 1 ; .,.' . i .< 1 t '••,' 1 . . . • , 1 . . . . , , ..... . .. ..;• . .,,,,..• 1 . . 1 ,I, ., '- gi 1 ' . _ . - • . , •9 .„'s , .. i.. .1---r''---1 l'''' 1 \ , . i ',..4: ,, . .7.,, . .____..,. . .....--7,,, ,• .. . ... . , „ • .I ). ' • • II: \ ' il• • A 1 .1 c's.),- , I --a\l,i 1 1 ii4idiii _fiudium . ..,,, , Ka • . .............................. 1 Tull= ..........7,_.0 ...........„.„' ... 1 . .....,. 1- c. \. . . . . . ,. . irf....., ,.,, g 'Prev'ld...r 5 Phase ...---- ----t-- . • r . ' •, •, . • -, , ,1. :AIL" ' illikit..• ' ,.. • . ,.. . 1 . . . •:. . lerf DeVeiorer, . si9nal 10 F.;te 'Frovid-'.• ,),•,. . . .. . t(,..- . 1 k , ,'. I:1"1 D 1.....t".1!.',.5 .:.". .t.l..1..........7..st,:: :):\ tt..-„,.....=.,..: '17. -=.41,....1....:t..1...t..17,711........ i '%'■.,...„....1 7 0 . . ... ,. 1. or:. .,„:5 1. , „,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,:,17;„:,,,,;,/„.,,,,,,,Tii,,,...;n?,,,,,,,,,„. „ -,„,,.,,,,„-,,::.'„ 4,-,-'',,-ti.7t.ih..,;kiliaq"'-',,,,L._.:•.:4:„;',.,,cc'''..,,,,,/::::','".....';1',''','.I'. ''"i"'''t1:1(' t . . ',..-:-•::::..'"-"""'",.?...:' ., _,,,-•••••:"....'"'""". 1.1,,,..TrAt.l'.. .P''''- r..-'''',...4+,,,*s.-- -.,-, ,-,,, ,—',,,,,,,,,,.t.,,... ,,- .,:-----,,T.-z- ,-7---- -"T--- _... ..,.,.---t,--, - "---. :::.,: - ---4=4,4_,--0 --,it-,".... .., ,- ;-,----- ,...-T!,,4-..,. ..,..._.,.„ -- •_-.....,7.,--.5,,,..zetprz.z..,,,_s:sz---::::,::::-- ---”1,___"---ii ,,,:,, ,,,,..„,-,...-„,—,,,a4tesea#910400,..,,,,,,o.a--,„;J.-2;m,.---t*437,4-4724,44-..,...„--;:::::=7.-9,---,----- „:„.....t...-.:;„..-..;;;,,,L.-1-z--._,--...4,--,:;--,,,,T---,...,--:-.---,..1---1). •. 01.-, . . ,,, . ,,,i---.4-7.i, .,,„.,‘ ..... - ' , 7-1.-,-,0,7- . . . ,, ' III till Ili fli,11111',111 iv I!lei ii u,!,11,)I iii 0 KIT)i iiiirro 1 I 1!it!0 fir ,I ii.1.1,1t1,11-111.11 ,1.111,1 1111111111'1q1li111111191),11t111,1111ilitillifliplipltillii1111,111161,111illipripitit,11111.1. _ _ _.,....._.,.. .... .1 . , _.,,..........._ ..—.... "44 / •/ , A ..., . ........'""''''' " '"'"'" 1 )1 ■1 ir I ' 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 . 10 I I 12 ' ‘ i 4. NOTE: I F THIS MICROFILMED I LMED ' '-'''''':" ' b'''''''' '' 1'''' .+:1'2,:i'*,,,J,`',5.:::;„1,-,'--,:' '.: ":' - : ''',r, '‘,,,,' -*''':,''''.,-.L • 4, .......,. ,,,40'.....,.....,«■:.,,,-±-,=.,_:=17:!..-„''. . . _ DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR 'THAN I r,1 ---__.„,,,,,,,, •i!'. , t, ..c' . It,,Il,p-, THIS NOTIPE-V4'11. IS,DUE'.TO - , ,'r,), , ,,„-■ - _THE 4„UAL ITY Cr THE ORIGINAL , , It.,„..■'",,,- J■ ,, . . . .... . , . . . , ,.., '1,• .1.. '' 11 '' i'' , . • , _ ....- ,,,--°—--'''''DRAW ING. „ oc 62 ez 2:E 9 S2, 02 CZ 22 1 02 6 t 81 LI 9 I cl'i ' t'1 CI E I I I 0 I 6 8 .,. _. . . 2. 9 S 0 c It.,, ' ., ,•• , . . ,. .- . _,,,,,,- ,, , t ..---- 1 % . . , 0111i111111111111111101,iiikill111111116091iititI11111111.11t1111111111,t1t1,14111111111.11111111111111111111111111111111111III11111,1111111111111)111111111111.111111i111111111,1111.1111111111111111111111111.616110111111111111111111111,11111111111111111111111b111114111111111 'r,,,,i.,,-11.1,..'" . • . . . .. .....,- , • ,e''' `"isi.':',IJ .• it. •. . , . • • .. ,.... . ... t . . 1 ,t, ••■■•'.. .-; '.`;'••:1,f..; . ' h. 4 .. . . . . .___._ . .,0•.i.klt.. .. .. ..,, . it i, . . , ft . , . . . . i','•.,.!,''''''.; A . . . • • , . 1. • ,'t . ..,,. i, I 4, , • .-,..' ' ''. ' ;11''4 1 . ".r..,': n k-,.■• . 14/ . , .. 4,4 . . . , • '':::;•4''' ' gl I I 1 , i I \t , , i • • , !,1 ' ,1 i.,.., 11;,, . • .i_d, mijk '..., `',...- I ' , . . . . . i . . . . [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]