Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SCE3-85
POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. ' . '� `ti iX 1���kkJ�1 }��5,�?l 71� _,.i,.m' 1t f'`�}`"ter,,.,!k1�S?�tir.s°r t�S`�Na .•'�': ll FS.t`�,, `�'v,1"i `. y \\444, �'`' 'Z'ZGARD ARCO SCE 3-85 X2475 SW Main Std 2S1 2AB 2800 f ' w i )SYh (T , l'''.--, . i.u ' • 1t I 1 ' s, a P. F r' 1 Q..M1 } i ti %, 'i t. • d t a H: : y- sr P I . : 4,, .„,,, :.J. Qir .,x 5/-g5 '.'-.. L, . : . AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss, City of Tigard ) _: j/7 ic I, /ne IrL,Id(lericc being first duly sworn, on oath depose and say: (Please Pr/int) -.-.q That Zama ..rte /" "� r for ,;' The City of Tigard, Oregon. 3 1. That I served notice of Final Decision `,..:• } for the Tigard Planninv Cnmmi cRi nn $,: of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each of the following = named persons on the /574.1'-day of �- ,� 198 by mailing to -' ., each of them at the address shown on the attached list (Marked Exhibit B), said notice 3s hereto atta hed, by posting on an appropriate bulletin board on the /. day of 2,� , ,/'^fir.----' , 19 .,� and deposited in the United States Mail on the '' f`day of i 7t i '/ , 1985---, postage prepaid. it if 1 /// . 47/4..._. f gna 0 / ;;,,,,/ 0' _, , , b, ,,:, ,- -- ',, : ..., 4 Pe 'son who posted •'''/:ulletin Board 4'-/ 1/ - ZL--2 iht , ! A .. - . ta . Person who S•1i ed to POST OFFICE Subscribed and sworn to before me on the /1 day of 1.98 , ` ?°: uk try a A* . '''-'4 0 C*,...* Sys 1 w. <(.T- r 2 �` ...�� S • #' NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON = ,, ;C6 : sion Ex p irea: 9 ,2 g 47 (0257P).. i . C • Y K fygyi�§. ...ice,^' /� ( CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - BY PLANNING COMMISSION 1. Concerning Case Number(s): SCE 3-85 • 2. Name of Owner: Leland Ariss/Dennis Thompson 3. Name of Applicant: Same Tigard Arco Address 12475 SW Main St.._____ City Tigard State OR Ei,7223 4. Location of Property: Address 12475 SW Main St. Tax Map and Lot No(s). 2S1 2AB lot 2800 5. Nature of Application: Request to allow an increase in the height of an existing freestanding sign to approximately 30' where a maximum height of 20 feet is permitted and a size of approximately 110 square ft. per side where 72 sq. ft. is permitted. 6. Action: Approval as requested XX Approval with conditions Denial 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant & owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected governmental agencies 8. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON November 25, 1985UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. .y; The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of condition can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard,, Oregon 97223. 9. Appeal: • Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 11-25-85 • • 10. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Departmen , 639-4171. OVilyLO (0257P) Tigard Arco 12475 SW Main .St. ° Tigard, OR 97223 lik `* . i • . . 'k ` .-_--_____-� ~' - _ _�-_'' ' ' - --` `� - ` - _. - - ' ^-� --^�--__ —_.__- --` ' � ( �, ^ /~'` \~ ��� � ~. :�� � • � �6 �� OF ��RD PLANNING COMMISSION `�` ' FINAL ORDER NO. 8B- �� PC `� A FINAL ORDER INCLUDING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS, WHICH APPROVES AN .,` , APPLICATION FOR A SIGN CODE EXCEPTION (SCE 3-85) REQUESTED BY LELAND ARI«8 AND DENNIS TH0MPSON. >,. `- _ -__ __ _�� . �� . . The Tigard , Planning Commission reviewed the above application at a public : hearing on September 10 and October 8, 1985. The Commission based its ` ,. decision on the facts, findings and conclusion noted below: v'` , . A. FACTS ^ 1. General Information CASE: Sign Code Exception SCE 3-85 REQUEST: To allow an increase in the height of an existing `�� free�tanding oign to mpprnximately 30' where m maximum height ��' c of 20 feet is permitted and a size of approximately 110 ^ square feet per side where 72 square feet is permitted. ``- COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Central Business District 2 . ZONING DESIGNATION: CBD (Central Business District) APPLICANT: Leland Ariss/Dennis Thompson OWNER: Same 12475 SW Main St. Tigard, OR 97223 ' LOCATION: 12475 SW Main Street (WCTM 2S1 2AB, T.L. 2800) � . 2. Background |}� �� |,� - - Conditional Use (CU 27-78) and Site Design Review (SDR 11-83) approvals were granted by the City to allow for the expansion of an existing car wash. This application was reviewed by the Planning Commission on September 10, 1985, and it was tabled because of improper notice and .| ` confusion related to the nature of the application. ' -; |^. ,`' ' 3 . /� - Vicinity Info n Y rn���! � � �``.� Pacific Highway lies to the north of the subject property and Main Street - is immediately south. All of the surrounding properties are developed and . , zoned CBD (Central Business District) . '� ' . 4. Information and Proposal Description � � �� . ����-���' . ___ � ` The property is occupied by the ARCO service station and car wash, Access is provided by several driveways on Main Street and Electric Street. '' There are two freestanding signs, and several directional signs oriented [ ` towards motorists who are on the oite . ` , , FINAL ORDER NO. 85- .20 PC - SCE 3-85 - PAGE 1 . .`� '�' ~ i `^ ~`'� ��'`�/�` �,�r'`/ '��� ` �.'���� ' -` . --� ,� `���. '` �i`�` � - � r� ^'. '`'� � ' � / ~`�u:` � �' `'. '''�� ' ` '~� `'./'�� � ' ��.`- . ' • 7. `. ` `` .'�'-�-�^' _� - ' ' '`� � _ ^` ` �___^- -�'�-' ^'^~^ ~'~- ' ._ ~�`.-�~--~��___��� , ^ :- ° ^ t, \�_ /. � � �..�� � . ` � One of the freestanding signs is the subject of this application. The u� '~ height was recently increased from 29.0 feet to 31 to 32 feet and an increase in size to approximately 110 square feet without receiving a Sign ,�.'i� �` Code Exception or sign permit. Fol:nwing notification by the City, the ^� applicant has submitted an application to allow the enlarged sign. 'z' . - The original AROD sign was installed at 29.6 feet in height in 1970. In fall of 1084^ the price signs were installed and the applicant contends ' thmt no sign permit was required by the City. In spring 1988, the car . ` height f th i increased by two feet � wash o�gn was added and the o e sign was nnreao ` A permit was not obtained for this modification. 5' f9,2120 andVp0 Comments • The Engineering Division has no objection to the proposal. ' � The Building Inspection Division is opposed to the request and it has � indicated that no permits were issued for the sign modification. /^ '- ` ``} . , No other comments have been received. \'. ^-' ` B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS � The relevant approval oriteria in thin caue mre Gt�tewide Planning Qoalo 1 and 2, and Section 18 114.14S of the Community Development Code. '`�� ' ` , The Planning Commission concludes that the applicable Statewide Planning - � Goals have been satisfied based upon the following findings: ' ` ,' 1. Goal 1 is met because the City has adopted a Citizens Involvement - program including review of all development applications by a Neighborhood Planning Organization �NPD} . In addition, all public . notice requirements were met. .'' 2. Goal 2 is met because the City applied all applicable State Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan policies, and Development Code ,�_ � requirements to the application. The Planning Commission conclum that the relevant Community "="=^"r"~''. Code requirements have t been t based upon the findings below: L` 1. In order to justify an exception to - sign code, one of the , • following three criteria (CDC 18.114,145) must be satisfied: 1 ,-' a. The proposed sign code exception is necessary because a 1 conforming building or sign on an adjacent property would i ' limit the view of a sign erected on the site in conformance le with the - b. The proposed exception to the height limits in the i code ~^^= is necessary to make the sign ' ---- from- h street because '/ of the topography of the site./ , � � c. There is an access drive which services the bu i ii service from a street other than the street on which the business is located. * ^ `�� ! ' ` ' FINAL ORDER N0, 8 PC ~ SCE 3-85 - PAGE 2 �� ^ . c;- �``.� ��` � ���.��. . . • . `'a/''.. -_-=~-��_ . - ' ,� .~ �: `` - . `- � ,` ''. ' ^ _ ( »~ C ~ '' ~� � . '� .: The applicant contends that the proposal meets the last two criteria � ,�� because the higher elevation of Pacific Highway and the interpretation • '_ � that Main Street serves an a driveway for motorists coming off of Pacific , '- Highway. ' '`�/ �� ' ' � +'.• The Planning Commission interpretation of the Code does not coincide with � `,� ..�. that of the applicant. Freestanding signs are intended to be oriented ) �)), . toward streets from which the business obtains direct access. The fact ' �^^ -^� ~ that the Code prohibits off-site signs and limits outdnf.* advertising � signs to Highway 217 and Interstate 5 supports this interpretation. With ' `� adequate visibility along Main Street, the additional height and size are ! `' !, ` not justified. The third criteria applies to businesses which have access �\ ��� ' x' to more than one street, such am m shopping center on a corner parcel. • '` � ^ �. The service station/car wash has access to Main Street or Electric and `z Burnham Streets which function as driveways to Main Street. ' ) !� The Commission recognizes the desire of business owners to take advantage , ' of the advertising potential near Pacific Highway. However, the approval � �� of signs which exceed height and size requirements will set an undesirable . + precedent for the downtown area Policy 11 1 1 of the Tigard ! ��� + ` . . \ �� Comprehensive Plan states 'that in the redevelopment of downtown, "convenience, appearance and the needs of the shopping public should be ��' � � primary considerations." The Commission concludes that the proposal is / . not consistent with this policy. : 2 i . The proposed free standing sign does not meet the applicable criteria. ' � However, it is not practical to reduce the height of the sign to 20 feet '''�` '-; ' ^ because of the existing canopy over the gasoline pumps which is 'approximately 13 feet in height. By lowering the sign to 20 feet, the ) lower portion would not clear the top of the canopy or be visible from ! . '''� Mmin Street. �'� � �� ,` The Commission concludes that lowering the existing sign so that it is »�� �.' directly above the canopy would be consistent with the intent of the i ^ Code. Causing the sign to be lowered to 20 feet in height would be ' � � impractical and the canopy would obstruct visibility of the lower portion �� �� allowing a sign height of 22-23 feet would allow for adequate visibility . . ,, and would conform with criteria "a." noted above. ' z ' In the past there have been illegal roof signs and banners displayed on . the site. Section 18.114 SIGNS, of the Community Development Code is • � available to the property owner and must be adhered to. Any signs ' '` presently on the premises which conflict with the Code must be removed � � ` � . `�- immediatey .. Any temporary or permanent signs must received approval from |`` �,��' the City prior to being placed on the premises. ` | ` C. DECI8I0N ' �. `.� Based upon the findingn and conclusions above, the Planning Cnmminninn approve.s of SCE 3-85 subject to the following conditions: 1. The sign shall be lowered so that it in directly above the existing caropy with a maximum height of 23 feet. Additional sign height must F - '�.� be � approved by the Planning Di�ector if it can be shown that it is ` . ne+'2ewoary to obtain adequate visibility above the canopy . - f.� �� FINAL 0RDER N0. 8 PC - 8CE 3-85 - PAQE 3 � . _-_- �,' * `. '��� .'.`'` i�`, ,``��' i�� � , /�,'. ' , � ! '' �-'~� � '� ' �'�,'.. ' . *,�� � ^ .` . ' ` / ��. • , k2;:v 2. A sign permit shall be obtained from the Building Inspection Division. It is further ordered that the applicant be notified of the entry of this order. - ' PASSED: This /D day of /1,igs-e....-61--e.,_ , 1985, by the Planning Commission of the City of Tigard. A. Donald Moen, President Tigard Planning Commission (KL:br/2006P) 1 • • • • t FINAL ORDER NO 85- A9 PC - SCE 3-85 - PAGE 4 • . TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING — OCTOBER 5, 1985 1. President Moen called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M. . The meeting was held at Fowler Junior High School, 10865 SW Walnut "-- LG]. Room. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: President Moen; Commissioners Butler, Owens, Peterson, Bergmann, and Leverett. Absent: Commissioner Fyre, Vanderwood, and Campbell. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES `-'' o Commission Owens moved and Commissioner Bergmann seconded to approve the Minutes from September, 10, 1985, as submitted. Motion carried by majority vote, Commissioner Leverett abstained 4. PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION ; , t ; o Commissioner Butler reviewed information from the seminar that he had ,attended, presented by the. Oregon Planning Institute in Eugene on r : October 4th. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4=; 5.1 NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION APPOINTMENT NPO # 3 DONALD OLSOf Senior Planner Liden explained that this item had been set over from the previous hearing because no contact had been made with Mr. Olson. Since then staff had contacted Mr. Olson, who stated he would attend the . : meeting. Mr. Olson was not present. • Commission Peterson proved and Commissioner Butler seconded to set this item over to,the end of the meeting to give Mr. Olson an opportunity to show, Motion carried unanimously by Commissioner's present. 5,2 SIGN cE, EXwTIO+ S �- e� TIGARD �aR���EN�xs r�yw PSON NPO Request to allow an increase in the height of an existing freestanding sign to approximately 30' where a maximum height of 20 feet is permitted and a size of approximately 110 square feet per side where 72 square feet is permitted. Located: 12475 SW Main St. (WCTM 281 2A8 lot 2800). Set over from September 10," 1995. Senior Planner Liden reviewed the history of the changes the sign had gone through since its original construction. Staff was still recommending denial. Two pictures showing the sign from Pacific Highway were distributed. Discussion followed regarding the size of the different ! : parts of the sign. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 8, 1985 Pi m' 1 ' .. - - , ,. . . ,. .. ,;..a•' . , , • '. {- APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o Dennis Thompson, 12475 SW Main Street, concurred with the staff report regarding changes to the sign. He felt the Code was being selectively enforced and interpreted since the majori 7 of the signs on Main Street are non-conforming. Discussion followe4^' regarding the criteria, size of the sign, and possible compromises. `�j PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED , , „: 0 Discussion followed regarding what was allowed for the Texaco Sign Y .. Code Exception. Consensus of the Commission was that the sign should be lowered. President Moen preferred having the request forwarded to City Council. : : ',-.: v Commissioner Bergmann moved and Commissioner Owens seconded to allow the current signage and have the sign height brought into conformance of 20 feet. Motion carried by majority vote. Commissioner Moen ;:. voting no. ' .- o Discussion followed. Applicant stated the sign could not be seen above the canopy and asked if Director Monahan's MOMO could be taken into consideration. Senior Planner 4_iden read Mr. Monahan's memo. _ 'h.. Further discussion regarding the height. il * Commissioner Owens moved and Commissioner Bergmann seconded to recede the previous motion; allow the existing signage and lower the sign :: height to the point where it will clear the canopy for visual clearance based on the following finding. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. Jt o f Section 18.1.14.145 a. The proposed sign code exception is necessary i ;,. - f because a conforming building or sign on an adjacent property would ,e`' t: limit the view of a sign erected on the site in conformance with the ° :" sign code standards. � b i. 5.8 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 11-85 and ZONE CHANGE ZC 7-85 ' ';: SOUTHERN PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CO t NPO.if 5 Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Light Industrial and for a Zone Change from R-12 (Residential, 12 '` units/acre) to I-P (Industrial Park); and for a Zone Change on adjacent q parcels from I-L (Light Industrial) to I-P (Industrial Park). Located: north of Upper Boones Ferry Road between 1-5 and 72nd Avenue (WCTM 251 1200, lots 100 and 600; WCTM 291 12DA, lots 100 & 101). Senior Planner Laden reviewed the proposal and made staff's recommendation for approval. ' APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o Duane Moore, 520 SW Vamhill, Portland, concurred with the staff report and was available for questions. e. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 8, 1985 Page 2 • - ffilaffaffillaraffiwassauttaftiminum' nimmessimg— - - - --------------e- STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 5.2 OCTOBER 8, 1985 - 7:30 P.M. TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL - LGI 10865 S.W. WALNUT TIGARD, OREGON 97223 A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: Sign Code Exception SCE 3-85 REQUEST: To allow an increase in the height of an existing freestanding sign to approximately 30' where a maximum height of 20 feet is permitted and a size of approximately 110 square feet per side where 72 square feet is permitted. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Central Business District ZONING DESIGNATION: CBD (Central Business District) APPLICANT: Leland Ariss/Dennis Thompson OWNER: same 12475 SW Main St. Tigard, OR 97223 LOCATION: 12475 SW Main Street (WCTM 2S1 2AB, T.L. 2800) 2. Background Conditional Use (CU 27-78) and Site Design Review (SDR 11-83) approvals .; were granted by the City to allow for the expansion of 'an existing car 'o wash. This application was reviewed by the Planning . Commission on September 10, 1985, and it was tabled because of improper notice and p a q confusion related to the nature of the application‘' 3. V191111 Information Pacific Highway lies to the north of the subject property and Main Street is immediately south. All of the surrounding properties are developed and zoned CBD (Central Business District). 4. Site information and Pfroposal Description The property is occupied by the ARCO service station and car wash. Access is provided by several driveways on Main Street and Electric. fft Street. There are two freestanding signs, and several directional signs towards motorists who are on the site. R 3. One of the freestanding signs is the subject of this application. The height was recently increased from 29.6 feet to 31 to 32 feet and an increase in size to approximately 110 square feet without receiving a in Sign Code Exception or sign permit. Following notification by the City, the applicant has submitted an application to allow the enlarged sign. ..: rah � KUYsf +' The original ARCO sign was installed at 29.6 feet in height in 1970. In fall of 1984, the price signs were installed and the applicant contends that no sign permit was required by the City. In spring 1985, the car `'`t wash sign was added and the height of the sign was increased by two feet. A permit eras. not obtained for this modification. rt : ' 5. Agency and NPO Comments ��: • The Engineering Division has no objection to the proposal. The Building Inspection Division is opposed to the request and it has indicated that no permits were issued for the sign modification. No other comments have been receivede B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant approval criteria in this case are Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2, and Section 18.114.145 of the Community Development. Code. The Planning staff concludes that the applicable Statewide Planning Goals have been satisfied based upon the following findings: • 1. Goal 1 is met because the City has adopted a Citizens Involvement • e. program including review of all development applications by a Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO). In addition, all public notice requirements were met. r 2. Goal 2 is met because the City applied all applicable State Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan policies, and Development :- Code requirements to the application. The Planning staff concludes that the relevant Community Development . .z Code requirements have not been met based upon the findltng.s below: 1. In order to justify an exception to thee sign code, one of the ' ' # following three criteria (CDC 18.114.145) Must be satisfied: • T F a. The proposed sign code exception is necessary because a . } conforming building or sign on an adjacent property Would .* : limit the view of a sign erected on the site in conformance with the sign code standards. b. The proposed exception to the height limits in the sign code is necessary to make the sign visible from the street because of the topography of the site r, c. There 'is an access drive which services the business or service from a street other than the street on which the business is located. p 1 . a a.' e ,g_; .. •—.v+ w.-u..c:h...-a^;*t^.,:`..-",w:...-s..+.. a+-s.: .Rkk.: y: - ..." „ ..- _Tee_ :T 4 fA The applicant contends that the proposal meets the last two criteria because the higher elevation of Pacific Highway and the interpretation • that Main Street serves as a driveway for motorists coming off of r' Pacific Highway. The Planning staff interpretation of the Code does not coincide with ee that of the applicant. Freestanding signs are intended to be oriented toward streets from which the business obtains, direct access. The fact • that the Code prohibits off-site signs and limits outdoor advertising signs to Highway `217 and Interstate 5 supports this interpretation. ee With adequate visibility along Main Street, the additional height and size are not justified. The third criteria applies to businesses which have access to more than one street, such as a shopping center on a corner parcel. The service station car wash has access to Main Street or Electric and Burnham Streets which function as driveways to Main Street. The staff recognizes the desire of business owners to take advantage of the advertising potential near Pacific Highway. However, the approval of signs which exceed height and size requirements will set an undesirable precedent for the downtown area. Policy 11.1.1 oof the A . Tigard Comprehensive Plan states that in the redevelopment of downtown, ee °'convenience, appearance and the needs of the shopping public should be ee primary considerations." The staff concludes that the proposal is not ee consistent with this policy. s; In the past there have been illegal roof signs and banners displayed on the site. Section 18.114 SIGNS, of the Community Development Code is available to the property owner and must be adhered to. Any signs presently on the premises which conflict with the Code must be removed ', immediatey. Any temporary signs must received approval from the City • • prior to being placed on the premises. se Y_: C. RECOMMENDATION i Based upon the findings and conclusions_ above, the Planning staff :. recommends denial of 'SCE 3-85. -. / .4 4./..7 . . ., . . . PREP A. 1) *Y: Keith Liden APPROVED BY: William A. Monahan Senior Planner Director of Community � .• Development • (KSL:pm/1801P) '' is 1 STAFF REPORT -- SCE 3-85 - PAGE 3 ' 1. hf,., • -r s i e- P J- 5 gefaefa. di 47A.-td1 AgeM 17 et 7 / - .. 10 ,, .4' dAti it, .44,i.a.„04,7- __,4,701:2,„, d 7/ety,. ,.,.. ,..• - ...,,, ''' : .. .0,-. 6//./11 ,, .. ., ,.: � . .„..„.2.. 41;4, /.0.41_,.., it, , „fiet/442iii„.,..„...._ 44 . . - „. s/...) ... .. . .,.. / , , ../ id ,4,14/75- ..iitkiiget„,,..vit,m. . , . _ i. ,, .. :. / '''......,..:...•'..', , . (k/erm .-2-57 .24413 , TL . .`2i/°°) , 4, 12g-z.,„(e) A.,DD A rs tecti,t,zi . ._.,., 749",14,,,/ii, ii;fetti ,esee0A et, 4,,,.. 4,,,,,,,f. 4,,,,‘,4„,, . ,. .. 4 401,;(41 4t./.. -':- '.t `d''''''' -4, .04,--etv.... 7/ erri&-.64014.0-1.4 39/ed - • I ::r r ��` .� .moo ie . ,,,,X174.,' ..'' . ' '/' 1140ti. *.di 402(yea"It14/0/ 7Z"15,94 ? id/0" , ...‘,. ialazi Lt../, ..,‘,. . 17 „Ai , ..,; ,//,,,u,,i.c.e.f.,e` 112‘,04e-pii''L , .- A.,,- ea .../. .7 .i',/ ,-,7/ .(1. 5z/7.547- viii/X11-4-4;-- . . -T-L... 2g-.00) ;:‘,.:, (//t/tlio ,,, -- f -P-As) . • t •_E -.I • i - __~-___- . r''-' ~ [ � ` - ~ ` f \ �/ ^ �� - `� ` �, ' STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 5.3 '� SEPTEMBER 10, 1085 - 7/30 P.M. TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION L ` ,'' FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL - bGI 10865 S.W. WALNUT -.-..-,.� > �� TIGARD, OREGON 97223 [ !�`^ , ^ - , .�� �. FACTS -�� ` 1. General Information ` CASE: Sign Code Exception SCE 3-85 �� ., " REQUEST: To allow an increase in the height of an existing ^ freestanding sign to 29'0 1/2" where a maximum height of 20 , .' feet is permitted and a size of approximately 105 square { feet where 72 square feet is permitted. ` COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Central Business District ' ZONING DESIGNATION: CBD (Central Business District) | ~. ^ APPLICANT'. Leland Arinn/Dennio Thompson OWNER: omme i `�`' . ' 12475 SW Main �t . ,� [ Tigard, OR 97223 `� ~, , LOCATION: 12475 SW Main Street (WCTM 281 2AB, T.L. 2800) ` �`'' ^o� � � � --„'• �. 'Background ^/ c� Conditional Use (CU 27-78) and Site Design Review (SDR 11-83) alo app,"v • were granted by the City to allow for the expansion of an existing car wash. � 3. Vicinity information / Pacific Highway lies to the north of the subject property and Main ." 8treet is immediately south. All of the surrounding properties are . p developed and zoned CBD (Central Business District) . � �` , � 4. Site Information and Proposal Description ` . � `� - ! � The property is occupied by the ARCO service station and car wash. Access is provided by several driveways on Main Street. There are two directional �� pennants, f reeo t freestanding signs, one roo f sign, and several / `, signs oriented towards motorists who are on the site, . ^. . �� One freestanding-- signs is of the subject - this application. The .� `� height nt1 increased to 29' /2" without receiving a Sign Code Exception or sign permit. Following notification by the City, the ' applicant has submitted an application to allow the enlar8r:: sign. ' �, , �` '' . STAFF REPORT — SCE 3-85 - PAGE 1 .� /, �� ^'', �~ ' `� � '`' ,} . �� ` ^ '' ^ � ' � ` ' ' ' �^ ^ �� �� `` /^ '��� ` • u ' ``. v ' ' � ' ^ - __ •-�^ � ° . , , '� " � ' n~ The application did not illustrate all of the components of the sign. , During the field investigation, it became apparent that this application ''` .� must be expanded to include an exception to allow a 105+ square foot sign where m maximum area of 72 square feet is permitted. The notice to surrounding property owners correctly reflects the request, but the . newspaper ad was released before the need for the amendment was known. � As a result, a hearing can be held tonight, but a decision cannot be ' made until October 8th. !�� 5. Agency and_NpO Comments n ineering Division has no objection to the proposal. -'!� The E z - ,� �( The Building Inspection Division is opposed to the request and it has indicated that no permits were issued for the sign modification. . � No other comments have been received, ` :' .` 8. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS `^ ~ The relevant approval criteria in this omnm are Statewide Planning Goals 1 and 2, and Section 18.114. 145 of the Community Development Code. • The Planning staff concludes that the applicable Statewide Planning Goals have been satisfied based upon the Following findings: /`' 1. Goal 1 is met because the City has adopted a Citizens Involvement '� �� program including review of all development applications by a ��', �program~. ^..~^~~^..� . `.^`_ .. all ~-'-^-~~_.- -,~--._ __ -, _ �� Neighborhood Planning Organization (NP0) . in addition, all public notice requirements were met. 2. Goal 2 is met because the City applied all applicable State ^? .-, Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan policies, and Development .x Code requirements to the application. , ' . The Planning staff concludes that the relevant Community Development Code requirements have not been met based upon the findings below: '' ' ��� . '� �` 1. In order to justify an exception to the sign code, ono of the �� ~ . ' . following three criteria (CDC �18. 114.145) must satisfied; !, .. . a. The proposed sign code exception is necessary because a conforming building or sign on an adjacent property would Y. \``' limit the view of a sign erected on the site in conformance with the sign code standards. 1 . ' b. The proposed exception to the height limits in the sign code is necessary to make the sign visible from the street because of the topography of the site c. There is an access drive which services the business or ' service from a street other than the street on which the o business in located . r � .� �: ..''` STAFF REPORT - SCE 3-85 - PACE 2 ' � - �' ' ^ ,. ��� i,�..` � '' ` - ,: `' • ' . _ � ___ � . ' - -- ' -�� ~ ^�-' _ _ . - . ~ ' /�-. � -- ~ � .' . The applicant contends that the proposal meets the last two criteria ` '`� . because the higher elevation of Pacific Highway and the interpretation ' - �. that Main Street serves as a driveway for motorists coming off of " Pacific Highway . The Planning staff interpretation of the Code does not coincide with that of the applicant. Freestanding signs are intended to be oriented toward streets from which the business obtains direct access. The fact - � that the Code prohibits off-site signs and limits outdoor advertising signs to Highway 217 and Interstate 5 supports this interpretation. With adequate visibility along Main Street, the additional height and '�� r size are not justified. The third criteria applies to businesses which ° have access to more than one street, such as a shopping center on a --� corner parcel. The ner^ice station/car wash only has access to Main Street, �� The staff recognizes the desire of business owners to take advantage of ..'`/ the advertising potential near Pacific Highway. However, the approval of signs which exceed height and size requirements will set an �`'• -! undesirable precedent fnr the downtown �rea. Policy 1l.1.1 of the F_ ` Tigard Comprehensive Plan states that in the redevelopment of downtown' "convenience, appearance and the needs of the shopping public should be primary considerations." The staff concludes that the propol it not "'/ consistent with this policy. � In the past there have been illegal roof signs and banners displayed on ^" '>`^ the site. Section 18.114 SIGNS, of the Community Development code is `� available to the property owner and must be adhered to. Any signs presently on the premises which conflict with the Code must be removed immedimtey.. Any temporary signs must received approval from the City -- prior to being placed on the premises. :� '� � °� ' C. RECOMMENDATION '(~ , 2 Based upon the findings and conclusions above, the Planning staff ` recommends denial of SCE 3-85. , .' / . ^ / ^- ` ` � ,—^~ . . , / ' - ^� � ^' �� � '�'��//^~^ / ' / '`~�—� - -�� _ . __ - ' . PREPARED BY Keith L`* ' APPROVED BY: William H. Monahan �^ '��!� Senior Planner Director of Community ; . . '`Development _ , ,` (K8L�pm/180�P) / . - ^ l �, ..��� �'. � STAFF REPORT - SCE 3_85 - PAGE 3 , ' �� � . _ ' ` .� ^`' _' �� � ` �^ �� -� �.1� , � '' � ��� ��� .'^ '� �' �' ^� ' ` ' "')�����`/���'��' / ������ ' /� `� ` ` 4`'_ .`�'''. ^�`� / '.' �.��` '� ' - - - _ .. .. . . .. . . ., .. •,,, . , . . ,.. -,, stir.e-r NO. ,- U( ',...-:\\C.,!,...„ 0/TL ( ,--' '- ...,uaicr c'3■ S C 0 / OF / . CHKO. l'11"....„..... OAT": L":1 /2,.‘&P5- .4/4//v sr: J013 No. -P.e.,,,--t---,iott, oat.6,oki .... ye Peiesitr /vo, 776-4/Z1) ., : . ...,. . •. ,. :,;.-.,........ ,.-. ,... . .... '..... /2- it1 ,. 1'4 .... .....'.,:,. . . ' _ . ... 4.--- "----- . , . , . l ,..., , 1 . -...t. t \ 1 „ie j (N ,.:, i .,.:. •,, •. I Ctl,* ! . ... ..i.....-...- 3- '-•,. .-- •, :. .....,, Id © 0 '' ) V .,•,..:. :,,, -0 ,, .. . 4.„.. , . . ........,_....._ • - :e. . ,.. . ........._ir . , .. .. . . . .,.. _ . . ... / • . ' •. . . Car WkSh 2 i .: Cu R G I itk ,..v. . . AA- .. . .- F E.:, X.. 2 ' C.S_2_3____ I II 4, Cti, ,.. . . ..,. 1.2.o..c,„,„,.,....,.........,.........,*t . I i .4—if----,----------/5.--0 . .. .• , . ,.. . .. , . ..., ,....:. ..f •• , . ._ , ... ...., - . 4' , . -... 1 1 ID ,. (...... .._ i • ' I . I . t•. . .. A . ,. .. I • , . . i -------L---LL Pt P S. X 26,),) • . 4 .,.. . I . ...,.,.r. i c............------pa, ,:.. •, t„, i ,..., . • . . . . . . _ . . .1.„............,Th ... . . /1/i)ore,4 e33tt.sr /etc ii,c/e4P t. , rt /S ._, :„ , ,,• C-----r÷ • i' . . . , . . . . . . . . . , _.. . . •• ...„ , , ... • .. .. . . . „ . • . . : , . , . MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON , . . . - . , TO: Members of the Planning Commission September 5, 1985 FROM: William A. Monahan, Director, 0,117Y\ Community Development T2 . ,---- SUBJECT: Sign Code Exception Request - Tigard Arco Dennis Thompson, owner of Tigard Arco, met with me today to discuss the staff ' report and recommendation for his request. He informed me that the height of 29+ feet is incorrect, that it is 26 feet, 1 inch. He proposes to modify his ' . application to bring the-top of the sign down six feet to just over 20 feet. .“ . . I feel that this modification plus removal of any signs which do not comply with the code, better addresses the standards of the code and should be given .-. . full consideration by the Commission. • (1808P) . , . . -. . i i . i 6 •: ' . ' t6 . ' ' . ' . • • . . A - ... .,. . .... • .• '.-. ..-. . I ,,.-....-.. _ _ , .,. t _ , -.-,.• .. . i . G X 9-rtom .-..--....: ,,, k4S •17Poz-C.0 'fife011"- °C-cicl-It.)..3 1 i?).. k IA- • ‘i;S' or-' 11:-.3 e CO r-Leetuorry 'Pe ki c.-1.43 PR . , m ‘, . . . . ,... J.-. . ra 1-‘4 c cet.?,:5%.e---b -e-rt..,2 e-T,4 0,...1 1-6 -114 ra i-41G V.,ti I-)M.II- l.N..1 -ri4 c c;(6-+■-) ' - -, ,:... ' ..c.)'D G 3%. 1..)(IFCSC=S iN.e --r o 1 4--0.4 c 2; m r t 7 4 E-- ..S1‘14J V ES t fa Le .--.\--12.c-e"T ri?,e.LA‘..l'akr oe -7-0 E- -ro PoG 2 A 12)-4-1' OF _ . • -' (... -1-01,:-.2.e"- kc. NO Nel-CSS WO-IL' Lt.)14(Ca S C-,211tC...e . -7-1.16- ZuS,14e5S .2 (., S.E120 kL-C C-0...0i.t. N s-rp.eze,-; 0-r-t4E-p... -r-FlAkJ 11.4 E <-1r,2 ka el- . w i Oa ce--aot cc; s. cothiei ot,I. .. . 0 4 c,, " . ..-.. ,; ,. _ 1-,te ePteoic.ost., ,,ic-. S. c,0 (.,.10' RA,0-1(ci .:-. .•°" 1 214 ‘2.1 az-0 ot....y Logy-7e- cAltwp\. (1„ 44.G.N.)„ 'roe- Abpt-redij Of. *. • 4i'z' -rt1t% StC9&i 5-17)(1-Ec. A•ki CY-Ct.\Z-es .,' Ar -1 oF :B9 Po 16. LI c. - 0 COCA -rIleae- Ut ut - , .., .:.,. X) li-k.PLeCc./V7t.S k.- W(.....,°.=, 0$s.;cauc.,..-k--,.0 6, -ra v.- -a-tz, we: . ,.. ee.et. -1;14Y-"\-• --rw,- --c-ofoc,g.Af 1.,-.-} oP t..CD C...Pritt04,1 0 . 1-4..-;G- c-t4.17,0,,,,.) (...1-5CArr C.% 1.13 ik t...0(.4.11:)e C-G t I&L. .• .-a,-..c to, pv.t.4.c.,, D1/43z -c...5[....0,3c.,,,. -rr4 ITT c-r(4-ro ','" 1..0 <4t,tir--''t, 1)210E -rfr4 120 MA , .., cabk..3 ,3 kic.3 '-i-,-1, V‘Ao-cc.9 s -rot, st.C.,‘,... c6, u o..1 ...C.,N a wpect.t.A ' ,-.\(;s., 1.-icak,,,„u) -;-,,, 774 6- 17.e./41.)Li'LL(4e....,, of=FE:(2.,. 1-4A,J NILO c,_T, ,... r•C°P,,,-*\-",,L,..). ri,,,-e (2 ta L Az-rthiG, °1-kl..■ -re7-A.0 - (•A‘' \-- ,,,A--‘t..,N,),o,k... S.ke.,-k..1 , wo\) e...-rit,..1,-“...-- C<-40LIA R•-4 '1;,,i C 17-'0P. C...P..Q■56 J‘,1 -Ck G fk-1-Z-0, riDA., t' ') rk,rm•-)\? WeeEi . N 1.),)NiZq' of- 1,,,a.,-C 00 L'? L.NVNA'T L3 e ti•P,>:) ' 1-0 oFF6 a • v oJc.., -1-.\--N,(2\..1 ki2 e7 ) W t-A-c , 20‘.(... e". c.)ovs--c.. Q.NN.) ‘-'" ,(C.,•f (2 ) kA(W -ro cif--7F-E-:Q., - ,.... e" .. . ,.., 1 12 C OIBQ toc.) ,,, U.,)C.7 FE Ek... .1-t-i NogG f:Pe)e LtS 1,..)6i 0 -TA •-...: '.. ot,-, sot,... .-. op 114c csyco,,,?-.12_ to,Gac....m.to-c-,..,.. s-02 ote...t..7,4 . '''T:Ci t (no .. ' • 14.e.e--:: E-co,..ks1 etA ilitle P\') I POI> we , -- , ' •:-:-- ' : . . . ., .. ., .r.: I .• . ,, , . . .. . . . , ' .... • - ' ., ' . o . . . . . . , • .. , .. ..- .,-•.:.',' ,.. . .• ,.,. . .....- ..- ••• - • . I:-.:-.... 42182 I GO SHEETS ,.. I • =• :.• . . ■t...! .' :, .. til P3 _I. 2 ? t..,___.__...., D..Y-5._. • ' .. ).:.., - F-. -- e , • l' ' - g &A ,,;; _ . , . . .. •- , - - • __ .-...• . hi I \Ai •7'1\1\ S • I - ... .1-,--- - .. _ . , . . . , . . • . . , . . . , . ... . .. -i ,:i..., . ..,,.., 20,7._ _ _ . :•. ,........., ..,.,,,,... • . ..„.„..,. .1'-'-',-'• . •'-',:;-''''''''.'r _ - -',-='=-.-4, i,..•.. • , . . .:..•:-i.'"sk,' • i i - t, r• . r . • U ',• \ I . :- • .I .. , . .• I . . • i , -. I . . I . I , I•,'.. 1 r. I 'Oka Z...,;',,,,,.--)1:,,_ t''.7.,•:..,:‘'.'.'''■.*, I . , „ . . , I . . I -., - :- - ... • j `4)'0 I g'-.). sez).n'i:- '1 '''2: • . . . .. •. L. :7:,• .. 1 ,, - • -.:.- ' •''''I 1/1;41 1 o. 4:•'..) 1 . . - . ' . , . - - ' • ,- 7 ' .: _ •- .,. . . .. . . , .-;-,- ' •-.: --=!::',,',,..-.,::., ;--1-;;:,,,...1:ji,'::',-,•-'-_,,,,:11.... ,•• ,.. •_,.:-. •:: ” . • • • - • . , , . . ., ,---_...—______L .. „: ,-• '•• ' . ..::,;.,k.,."L-..`-±:, '-'-'':" --'- ''''.-l'''--"'" - ' '-'-'"' ' . -'-.- -------"'--- ...,„. -. . —______ 1 - • ' . .. ,,_. , ,- • • .. ... . - -- •--- • — - r• ..' ':, .• • . ;, _ -:".- _'ca-I.f.tAr flIf11-1.,- _ . . .: ..... , ... .. . . .. . _. „. . . ._ . . .,. . .. . . . - - ' 'T.-. :: :-.• ,:-.,..',.--::-. ,,--.,.,,- .-.--,-'--,,-.::,.:,.... .-,,.....'..-.-, " . ::.:-... -...i........-.:'..,-.... -:. --...-.;- ....:. ,..- 4 ... ...,.....-..',., :,....„,!..--........ ..-7.:.-,..,...;:.::...,. ....-...-... '..,.......-.;.: .:-..' „....-;--.,.. :..... ..-,.,.... t4tOtl' nit80 Fit a .pt, 1-4vet) 4 , , fczp or„, 1985 "Glqiillagard Liquor Store 12490 So W. Main St. P.O. Box 23303 0 September 60 1985 Tigard, Oregon 97223 1483 / City of Tigard 639 4, Al Tigard Planning Commission j(017 12755 s. W. Ash P.O. Box 23397 eg 01"2b- Tigard, Oregon 97223 4/1011(A. db FOR Planning Department . . RE: Tigard Arco Sign I Dear Commissioners; in due respect to the City of Tigard Sign Code, I feel an exception should be allowed for Tigard Arco. The exemplary layout, landscape, maintenance of this operation necessitate the advertising this sign displays to the raised level of adjoining Pacific Highway. - Main Street Tigard benefits from a Sign of this magnitude; 17HICh helps create a traffic flow for all businesses to enjoy. Very truly yours, 0 G. L. Woodard TIGARD LIQUOR STORE ....„ by: -. Chuck Woodard , . : ). :. .' • . : •• ., • , , • . .. MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON :-- '..,, -; TO: Members of the Planning Commission September 5, 198 ..., FROM: William A. Monahan, Director, 14,1147n- Community Development '..,.. If.c. SUBJECT.. Sign Code Exception Request — Tigard Arco . '.' ,....,, Dennis Thompson, owner of Tigard Arco, met with me today to discuss the staff i*,,„-, L. report and recommendation for his request, He informed me that the height of 29+ feet is incorrect, that it is 26 feet, 1 inch, He proposes to modify his 1 , application to bring the top of the sign down six feet to just over 20 feet. I feel that this modification plus removal of any signs which do not with the code, better addresses the standar6s of the code and should be given full consideration by the Commission, : 'LI ''..' (1808P) . , . . . - . , . , .., -s 1._ -e K p" AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING '' STATE OF OREGON ) . ,r: County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) j c IP ark ��, sr' , being first duly sworn, on oath depose and say: (Please Print) �, _ That 1 am a • I ►'t,, „ for The City of Tigard, Oregon. `' : That 1 served notice of a public hearing for Planning Commission. a ` of which the attached is a c �y,� (Marked Exh it A) upl n each the following named persons on the 3C day of 4;, .' 198 by mailing- to ~_ p ->;• each of them at the address shown on the at/ched list (Marked Exhibit B3) , said notice as here,., attache./ deposited in the United States Mail on 198 postage prepaid, 4 the day of t., . _ , • '.-I =. illif il /4/ Signature ir - • /2ZE"--z-cezg____L"4___22Zg. f.: a Person who delivered to POST OFFICE n to before me on the 7 day of ,t� ( , 198 c . Subscribed and sworn ,y ,1t', r • , .1.' -A :, r , -, •.,c, ______4.. ,011,41-4...- e-4.12.1-67/ . .. . NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON • .ip• w'1 rk� # . r My. Commission Expires: --..8-- 7 I '; (0257P) ..r is S'r w • • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Tigard Planning Commission, at its meeting on Tuesday, September 10, 1985 at 7:30 P.M. , in the lecture room of Fowler Junior High School, 10865 S.W. Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon, :..':: will consider the following application: FILE NUMBER: SCE 3--85 ;'.:. APPLICANT: Dennis Thompson OWNER: Leland Ariss 12475 SW Main Dennis Thompson Tigard, Oregon REQUEST: For a Sign Code Exception to allow a freestanding sign of approximately 29 feet in height where a maximum height of I.; 20 feet is permitted; and a size of approximately 105 square feet where 72 square feet is permitted on property that is designated CBD (Central Business District) . • LOCATION: Tigard Arco - 12475 SW Main Street (WCTM 2SI 2AB, lot 2800) . • { (See map on reverse side) The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Community Development Code and rules of procedure of the Planning Commission. Any persons having interest in this matter may attend and be heard, or testimony may be submitted in writing to be entered into the record of the initial hearing. r , . E . For further information please contact the Planning Department at 639-4171. TIGARD CITY HALL, 12755 S.W. Ash Avenue (Corner of Ash Avenue & Burnham Street), or contact your Neighborhood Planning Organization (NP0) # _ Chairperson Gareth Ott Phone Number 620 .0267 (pm/0257P) .. . ..., •• ...... . .'.. .,. .. •-:. . , :•-•'-., .- :-,..:,...• _4,2/) ). < ),, ,i/.4.-- , 1 . /.... ki_ \ , -7----- 1 G H — .e- — .. —1----. ..-._._ . ...-, it.....,,.., \ -,....... . „ . ..: x - .!,4.. )1019 i I kV '"'s ....\ Li" ... 7›....- • \ 1- . . .S.:. OL - . -.-- al --nr---------::.'s 4.41 F ).--A, --.. - / / ' , \/„.._ , ''. • `P,s ' lin •. ''.. ; • -. .\:.:•,:',..: •:::: e , 4': '....;;',' 1/• :-.,4 fi- .-' 4111 1111111 0411/74„ 4, , / L. 2/, , . . , ....... 111. .., ..../. ,/: , 40, \ .. as 1-76 I ;W44 ilik.. L .. ., /„.‘,.......„.„......,,,.. .. • 1 III ..):1 . . ( /..,/- , . s, # .‘,..., - Ilk,. ,. v. ..._ i ti!› w 4,..4,_ ,,,.. „. , --,e.-- //.. "--,,. /: . 4e . - , :,, , -+ - ., •. ,. .....„ , , .4 , . ,,, , ,. • „ , .„.,,,..,. ,.> it. 1` 4, N\ \s' . . . , -•'''> ''t'i:',.'-• .7, - : • Wile .•• • ''' Tij , %.,.„. ... ,. ; .., , , , : ",s. ,, / , . , f,../ ,. ...,- „,,, , \, , • ,x,,, \> . . . /./ , , , ,•. '',.../ r•;''. - '-':', 41 \ i- ..- , /. /.. . ,.,,.. , \ v . . ,.... .... . ,.- , ..-..1, ,. • ... ,, ....„,..„;\., .„ >:K<7,.• , ., ,.,. • ., , , • / . ., \ .,.. . .,, - . V / ' ‘-..” , -,.., , . ., i.:. ,.. ..,. . . ,.. :. r- . CHARLE / / , --"S 17 4 ..4-...., F. rx ,k, / ,\'',. / / t\___,---7-1.X ,. •: ,. • .., • / \ i , 7 .,,,, ' .. '' II ./- .--;.5 .- T I G AR • - WI ,- ,. ., \:,:-_,,, -, -t ' "/ i NX / ` i \ %. ...... . . .... . i :•. l ..lI I Q'PAP'ci ,,\`'' ..\ \\// . ..'". r. ll CO 431. , • / ., , s. .,, , „ ., 0 .„. / , ... •ii x. \:, • , - -- N '' '' . , lui,, .401\,,s / \''- I /r\-t. „, • •- cr. ' /d '. ‘.....,-.: I .1 xf ...,..:.---,-1 1 • 1 * /,/, i-,4 I . / ',. . ph K 9TR E ' \ ,, , , „ 41.11.S ..----`4■1 ...---,‘ / '1' ' 'i.. •‘,‘. , ...„ .s. V.s., ‘,„.iii fol, \ , ), e i '\ C I. iL. i-- • -' , \ .. ' 1 •. Gt.t * ' 4, / ' \...--1 cpoll LAIsc ., , ' 1 .,... .._ • .. -. . :'....:.'-. \ 1 . - 0 , . .., STREET T • / I,,,,110 , . .I-f •:- F--, 1 , •.-.;-r.... mor '1 .,..... o'MARA . nn,.*,-• Air 4'1 (54'' \ ,\-, .'' ',, . 1 ' 9 . N'' ,....• ,. '''`: 4_,.- 1›. , . . • I _. . \.• ''4 N. •..(.142; '<_>(.,Z \ A 1 1 I 41111, ,. • DREW OP • ' . ... ..,,,, '..)0 ... 111 ". 'i 5%1V,,\•:.1 ::•,. - .- / I -17-71— I- ' 1 1? /- .,.. • . , I i I • I I- H"• ' . .... i ... . -: 1 --, •• ' . 'SI., L,, . ; . . .....)i :Hi, . -- -1 I I :1 " tfiLLyll wl 0 H in ' . \rrk r" ' HILL IEW t , I.,. 1 - I— 1 . , 1 --t•I ,. 1 1 1 i_, . s.,„ . 1 .- . ,..: — l•••_. ., , , 1 'V ''/'<'.:,r ria",--1D i , 1 1 ..i.E..,,,,L 1 1 1,_C I''. 1 • I- 2 • ggay.p................................................. 11 12-6 1 1 • . ' __,.t,Z.,......... 7-7- 7:7" 77"'.'..".7"'""'•-• 1 ; 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 .! I - 5\''4:, ir -----1 Iry . 1 ' th I .I. ..1 .. • \ ... • 0, I I r * -• ' 1 - - k.4o1.1otim 1 - .A . •.• . i li I .1 , s . tERR, E ) $45.,...,__ vi-w . r i r F'1 \ 1 2; . , . . . — --121.....LL' I , \. 0 1 I I , I s w. 1.:111in' MU• I set.i ,..L..... ______,. . ..-m CT '. I-10 -- -. - I - 1 rc 'T-1,.t, , III t;1.1 . ... . _ , ..1„ , , . .. poso m 1 . .•. , . . • . ,...., . , OK 3. ..',. URDOCK in ! ....1 TWALI TY 111 :-- 'A"-, li 'L rag S W PINES RO•K I" • r.. : INF i- ....• 2 O. 1 r— . prim .......::,.. In '' ..''' r „ ,-- ,-.. i 1 i ‘ r r .1 . • ., ' . w . . -- •.,. MURDOCK i, n ..' - - '1 . , . . ... ... , . ill. .. . . : •, . .-, II ill Ft .... _.... TEMPELTON ' '44—..- . NM 1 ... • : ..::,r..... i... ......i i- r .._ . , E L E M.. l■-0 ,11," ..:. „J:•:, .....t --7-- : 1,,,A en4 . vii klirt I . . .... L. ......A91Fr ... t.401 . I SCHOOL ) .I PEILING ST 411111111111e l , 1 .. r . .,- ,. ....... _.....„ . ... . litif frail no .1 ,. i._.. _ .„ ,.„1.. , •.... ... . OA,E 1. -- ' A • 1 . - i I ,-- -,...., ,... r- II : — iri 11, .. . . .., --- Aar, - . S . : ,FIOSS I `UM • ' ...,- .....,..., i ' - 7 h ,, ill MI:, 1 , 5 . 3 T T LE 4 I ” ....y, "LE-. .1...1.2271-LYE 11111 ill n` 7 i , r •'- ,s r j.fflin1±111111 a , FIII-I„.. ,...".::- _..a [ r ' I — IA --4 LT I-.i , ti I 11 ' '11'1E: -. 8 - .- . .,,. .. . . . :w • ,.... .... i 4:.- . . s.w: ....ts- _. ST EE MM. r' 1 b I '" I . • • . - . • . Millatkr . . . • • - ,. . . , • ., . • • , . ., . . •. . '' ,. • LLi_Ld\U t�l\1 vJ n.1.LcW ,1.,tkoU lit. AKERS DENNIS THOMPSON 9380 SW Tigard 12370 SW Main 12475 SW Main Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Gary Ott HANSON HOFFABBER PROPERTIES 9055 SW Edgewood P.O. Box 12 12005 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 WEENE, 97067 Tigard, OR 97223 4::; DOLAN PETERS,/%FISH'ER DEHARDPORT/%TRAVER 7344 SE Foster Rd. I OO SW Fairhaven Wy. 9185 SW Oleson Rd. Portland, OR 97206 '1Eard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97223 DOLAN B>JRRY/NORMAN/%CAPISTRANO DREESZEN 4025 SE Brooklyn 12370 SW Main 13200 SW Howard Dr. PORTLAND, OR 97202 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 MAWHIRTER COLUMBIA CUISINE INC. TIGARD FEED & GARDEN 14265, SW 80th PL 3.131 Westview Ct. 12355 SW Main TIGARD, OR 97223 Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Tigard, Or 97223 R s CACH MARTIN MCDAI'.) 15170 SW Sunrise Ln POW/MUM/ 9225 SW Burnham St. Tigard, OR : 97223 Tigard, Or 97223 MCCLURE/%SMITH VERMILYE 12425 SW Main 11272 SW Capitol Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97219 PETER/%ERDMAN FINKE 12405 SW Main P.O. Box 23562 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 FORD JANOE, BUTON/% BERTULEIT 12370 SW Main P.O. BOX 23338 TIGARD, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 MOORE MCCLURE PO Box 23908 9250 SW Tigard; TIGARD, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 TIGARD/% WOODARD HAKOLA • PO BOX 2330 10260 SW Brookshire TIGARD, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 ;.y ..,‘L zF---ez-g--___c- REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS ,' TO gineering - Randy DATE. August 169 1985 - ';• ` FROM Tigard Planning Department RE: _Sign Code Exception S E -• t-. - . _ . 4 a . "I. .. . -ption to allow a freestandin: sin of a•.roximatel 26 feet in hei:lit where a ' } maximum height of 20 feet is permitted on-,property zoned CBD (Central Business District and located at 12475 SW Main Street (WCTM 2S1 2AB, T.L. 2800,E Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From :`p information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other ', information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by August 28th 19 85 . You may use the space provided below or attach a .,' separate letter^ to return your comments. zf !}Lou are unable to res.ond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and . confirm your comments in.- writing as soon as possible. If you have any '' questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O. • Box 23397, Burnham and Ash Ave. , Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639--4171. _ ,;, STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: - -___JK We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. . Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments: t: as • Rif 'f,t:' Name of Person Commenting: ....4imitr ,° '. - • ii Phone No. (KSL:pm/0356P) t. 4 1 r. tt4„ Y , `' ~~-�° .--' - - ' - ' ' - v `� ' ` /` .__ `._ .^� ._ ^�_ _ _ __ `� _ ~�__~ '' ~_'~_��+x ' � � '� REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS ' TO: ______ DATE: _August 10, 1985 ` FROM: Tigard Planning Department ~ . . RE: Sign Code Exception SCE 3-85. Re" 'r- " ^ �!- " t ^ " - x" °".. .''ptiou , . allow a freestanding sign of approximately 26 feet lo max zoned CBD (Central Business District) and located at 1247 WCTM 2S1 2AB, T.L. 211,012._ ' . Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be ` prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future, _,' If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by August �.. ` ' . 28�� , 1�_ 8� . You may use ±he space provided balow or at�anh a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the ,,.. � above d�t�, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and� ,^`' �o' confirm your comments in: writing as soon as possible. If you have any . - questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O. - _ • Box �3397 Burnham and Ash Ave. , Ti��rd, OR 97223, Phone: 639-4171. ' . STAFF CONTACT: Keith Lideo ___. . 4 ' PLEASE CHECK ThE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: ' ' ?, _____ We have reviewed the propoma it. and have no objections to t. ' • Please contact of our office, __ � Please refer to the enclosed letter. _____ Written comments: .' ___- ' ______. ____- ___' .' ^ . - - . ^, ____ * __. ____ __' ____-- . Name of Person Commenting:_ Phone No. _ (KSL:pm/0356P) F.1. r ` �. . 1 " � 4 . PLEASE TAKE THIS TO THE CASHIER FOR A RECEIPT - NAME: fie.12.4112-42 619— .1i,,,,ovil DATE 16GII_EL_ nESCRIPTION . AMOUNT 10-220 Refundable Performance Bond Deposit $ :- . , • - 10-435 Sign Permits HOP TU . $ Public Sewer PlarLtg± P*eck/Ins ection Fee_ 10-436 Public Storm Plan Check/Ins.ection Fee $ ‘...,.s,r . ,,A4 . ■ 10-436 Street Dedication Public Im.rovement Fee $ , - -- .1. _ 10-436 Street O.eni . Permit $ *■,' 10-437 Subdivision Applications: _____ S MLP - ' . 1________ - .. 40-440 Zoning Applications: '-' 3a---- CPA ZOA PD SDR Misc , , SCE,.,-.1 CU SL P V c.....-...---' . 21-442 Street Lightf21 ______ __.— $ , - - /0-451 Document Sales: En- . . Plannin. Bid. . $ - .. 10-451 StreetandT1---- ----- $ 1. .. TOTAL $ .-: .., . / (1045P) * .. - , . . ... ., . . • . • - . t ,, CITY OF TI . WAS$i3NG1ON COUNTY,OREGON SIGN CODE EXCEPTION APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO "% ' RECEIPT NO APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: 12r DATE: , Y 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: (PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION ` j 5 J �!/� r A) Application -; '''j(B) Owner's signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT N0. 2'3 i.. 2 1B 2 E authorization ` (C) Title t"ansfer instrument (1) 1 SITE SIZE 00 A f . P-. — /(D)(D) Assessor's map (1) :...PROPERTY- OWNER/DEED HOLDER* 4,} i f1,' _ =1 / 1 1, ! . { (E) Site plan-(IA---copies) - ,� 7 :,� _ ADDRESS PHONE ,� - /.,, (F) Sign. plan (15 copies) b, CITY r _� ZIP 2,Z,., t` . (G) Applicant's statement w a., APPLICANT* �,K yI S O v& _..._.. (15 copies) ADDRESS PHONE (H) List of property owner's CITY ZIP within 250 feet (1) *When the owner and the applicant are different AI) Filing fee ?A people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. 0 COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request a Sign Code Exception to allow N.P.O. Number: 'I r2 pD T►0u 2'X11..r —+ �, — Planning Commission Approval Date: Final Approval Date: Planning i Engineering Sign Permit Number and Date issued: f, (KSL:pm/0739P) i i 3. List any other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit ti attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed up.on the subject property. f• H. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements I ' for approving or denying the application. -._ -DATED this :.27,ciffIN day of 19 rj SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. { 1 •`1: fyyy (KSL:pm/0739P) t,- t i 1 4 ■ o .i., i• Tigard Car Wash 12475 S. W. Main Street i` • Tigard, Oregon 97223 1 • • July 24, 1985 • Mt. Lyle Goodell P. 0. Box 23173 . Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Lyle: Obtaining a permit for a sign code exception requires ' ' signatures from all parties of record indicated on the : - property deed. I am interested in obtaining a sign permit for the altera-- , tion to the ARCO sign to include CAR WASH. - I would appreciate your assistance on this matter. Also, j _ . would you be able to assist me with the same for • Mrs. Martha L. (Ariss) Meisenhelder. Thank you. Sincerely, Dennis Thompson ,a i I- . . f.. fi, Or !'• ,,sue ....44...otoimer -..d , - .., , if - ' 0* 4111F .'"A:: , 2et--1Xe-72,-lat..e.,.." i ij Te Good 1 Mrs. Martha L. Aris Meisenhelder i 1 i is IF 5 l•. ({t}fr tF. _..,.,.. . ,,. .. ., a . .•-. ': '. '. •: wA..:ti-...;ww«.. ._ ~RPM. .. ...a,-. ' . ?,... • ' . :':".• ,,• 1.' .'...• ' f' ' .. - ',..•:' • ,. • .:. i . .' i I , A 21242ET421j""ti3:211.417.9 S.I.O.'''' •. 'D a ILIUM"Obi al X.et fa*42)2230 • 1 1 I .:• i 1 • To , wire; _ .......1••• i . 4.....1 '• Date__ L3 .____Thne 4alet fr".1 WA. ILE YOU WERE OUT , [ - ... ., : . M . ;,... .. . . . of : --5 ,•;....-*. A..4, :, at ,,.:, • t , Phone I; "---"--- ' [ TELEPHONED I PLEASE CALL 7.'4C RETURNED YOUR CALL WILL CALL AGAIN S *.., WANTS TO SEE YOU , RUSH .. 1 :': 1 - - - . Allir Ai I ... Message_ f. ..—iii. ...,......,;; .4, 'of- -: -*/ ---- . L _____ r a' '- . _ 1 ) I. ...... „ , - p d 5 7,24 • , . ttit ?,. i ' , i • i ... ,. 4 " , . • .. io+..1.- .ate . C74ors2atar CIA=MS, camm, !iglu", .,. To_____ r To ..--, - Date 17 Time _,Time_ ,,'; k YOU wgRE OUT 1 YOU WERE T J��} jam. py ' i•. .P / of 4't i _ Vito r / °.,- ' " /'io Phone Phone � � :'� mo TELEPHONED X PLEASE CALL TELEPHONED K PLEASE CALL X* RETURNED YOUR CALL WILL CALL AGAIN RETURNED YOUR CALL WILL CALL AGAIN WANTS TO SEE YOU I RUSH WANTS TO SEE YOU RUSH • • Message Message_ i a ,4 '` d t....5 ,A )' 1/Y1,(.241 ..5-777.21to, , I ap 7,,,,,,,,.,e , , i ..,, „. . .., ., , r ` 1 p d-5 7 AA B y ; ,,, ,.._ pd®57 By; (1,:Th i 'I 4/:6 f'," / ,..''' . /4.2,, (;:i „,,,,,, . , . 7,-- -, , , I, V* ■I' p s FP( ,, o' y 1' ,' 4 Y (..='.a ,fix' ,. .,i ' r, / ` +7,1� 1:1 t" r �Y °/: pia ��� M 2F+ ;�,:"�+. �'1"`�"Asa ,./ it „I. r'. �A ,. d' ,¢ c, a 3. 'te r k,. ,c,.., , / .. dry", w" ,,-..- j r ! ff /71-- af 2, ,cT pk , . 1 / ')''') /0-e,"/I, -,e 6114 dief,.//I IV ii 4 f. + ,.- - ' �i ) okek. 0 P ,( 4 . 1 ft./a/1i z____ , , H "lei/Li-1 , A71)41 t r*1/.°'4'4 472/1" i a(2/lavi -444111"44 '407 ,. e-6)",,,,b 747 6/,,,,,,,,,f,,e,ze,0,e, • tp• • Y i . /1 `ou .. /1 / ileVil,X.'.'' C•A 67 t I 6."' / • s dillif (di/iSii i . i " ki ill,14 IA . ' 17 4.,... /171./2/1.141" //alp /6'''''''66e4'‘Wiii 74749'""/ ' N E 4/1// d i •1 7 ,, • } a• Kw� K6«a w 'y■-, .2- s • ' ...• , . ' . SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD Date 5/).q , 19 No • The applicant hereby applies for a permit for the work indicated or as shown in the accompanying plans and specifications. , 4---- , SIGN LOCATION ADDRESS: L. ,--- •/ A- j ----)(, "''. .. * ..• APPLICANT: Owner / Lessee -74 0 14-i Ps'e-,... Authorized Representative NAM E/C0fV1PANY '........... .1)._____C-th2--- --- -ref 69 -)-4)-- :is%i g( .• PROPOSED SIGN: Freestanding "` Wall • Projecting Other SIGN DIMENSIONS _a:L21X i.)-' AREA 7.- .'3 5c; FT HEIGHT 1,-2- WALL AREA .... ............... PROPERTY FRONTAGE ........._2.:.C.0.2._. COST,...1(.4;•_.<27 . ZONING DISTRICT _ILLUMINATION MATERIAL COLOR --1L,---"1") COPY . DRB EXISTING SIGNS: Freestanding _ Wall ______ Projecting Other _ COMMENTS: ,.4.5..--,e-./...s• 77 ,(7., ,-„0-,e-, 4 " er 4*-1' All sign permits must be accompanied by a scale drawing and plot -- • plan. If work authorized under a.sign permit has not been completed '- within ni -(ty days after•the issuance of the permit, the permit shall PLANNING DEPARTMENT eh become I and yoid., Permit Fee :I ,, 4m,t AlrAl ' _lb-- - , I Approved 1idizipp . - t'sSignatu e at; .......69_, , - 1 aeceift lo.' 11111111111 Renewal Date IIIIIIIIII Address Telephone . . • i . . . . . • .. , , . . • 7S), . . : . \J',-(-1 a )'•-:. . \ . ' ? - - • • _. // � /��•L Su [may. l / ..... t '`"r'1'� 0/'�1 Lr '�Y '`�O4 v'ajVc 1 O ° •O J.l��r t ®• //'' "�f{/•/�' I• !e j2 s" /Jf4//v Sr: J013 NO.CHKO. u,•. «��-� b oace,onJ . p'/P,slit y0, _ g . . . . /2-6 -,. .—: {1AY 3 0 1985 ! �F TIGR� P L NNIN DEPT.C b , , . :::..1, •AL . ... • , s/� A r •�� Y 1 .3.'Cf__is 71 ' • ,. y;� .�, «.a.�.. .,�, 'c:: ...,,..._..: _ ' -wuJ.N«tuuy..,. crna:xrras.-;w»* -... I ‘1, C ar 4. 2 { --,. "� ,.. ._ .` a X, to 6/y, ,�t l 1 wY { i i . - (----t. 1 .. i • • i 7--.0 ......M1....10............M....114/1110.MONYdallUd.la..............4.. { t M°o l i 1 . DTE,• a-ctiSr `/ &C yF/6LD " 0r0,)(d°,�--C' /cam �r,c ee Foor NG —1rX/s7'-/IV6 • _ . ... M , y Tigard Car Wash 12475 S. W. Main Street «:= Tigard, Oregon 97223 _' May 29 , 1985 MAY 30 1985 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT. .Mr. William A. Monahan Director, Community Development City of Tigard , ;; 12755 S. W. Ash Tigard, Oregon 97223 r P.E. Correspondence 5/22/85 (1392P) Dear Mr. Monahan: •' The freestanding sign was altered on our property in cooperation with ARCO. My understanding was that the alteration would only constitute a change of copy. It was due to this misunderstanding on my part that I did _' not file for a sign code permit. Thank you for your consideration of my application. I sincerely hope you determine that the appearance and overall quality satisfy the intent and purpose of the -. code. i.g We have received numerous compliments from community members that have driven by on Pacific Highway and were `? not aware of our car wash. Service from Pacific Highway ;� is very important for our business and the economic development of Main Street. Thank you again. . Since ely, ' 77 ViaCfr ' -F Dennis Thompson Owner 0 1, 4 e g'. '.4' • . ' „2 _ CITY SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION oF TIGARD Date ___ ----' q—,—, 1 9 e..5 ...s, The applicant hereby applies for a permit for the work indicated or as shown in the accompanying plans and specifications. SIGN LOCATION ADDRESS: / 4. .1 i II A • ,. • D 6--rtilit4 C, . 0 iki19,‘OK/ APPLICANT: Owner / Lessee ____.--,--. Authorized Representative — .. NAME/COMPANY 7 Jot 1 Tel. •. PROPOSED.SIGN: Freestanding / Wall ...._:_— Projecting _.-7—.0ther --__L---- • . , SIGN DIMENSIONS 27-X V________-2------ AREA f-1_210.-1---,5 r—L—1 HEIGHT ..2e___--_ WALL AREA _________ PROPERTY FRONTAGE .:_222.21—__ COST 4•_..2-R...012—. ZONING DISTRICT __—ILLUMINATION --. z MATERIAL -------------------_ COLOR , 1 ._.__ DRB COPY EXISTING SIGNS: Freestanding — Wall ....._—_,.. Projecting ____—_ Other .---------- COMMENTS: H •All sign permits must be accompanied by a scale drawing and plot • ' plan. If work authorized under asign permit has not been completed within nine• days after.the issuance of the permit, the permit shall PLANNING DEPARTMENT become I and void. Permit Fee j Approved V App 'cl fs Signature -' 11.19s2a:tLo...:_________ „,• , Renewal Date Address Telephone - . . • ” h . •••. r -. •' . • ' r . reg%R.D .. MAY 30 1985 . , . CITY OF TIGARD . . PLANNING DEPT. ... . -. ,.. , . .. . ..- . , ..: • , , . .. . :. • .A• • . .. , , ,, . .. ... . t,. .. • ,, , ,r .. s ,,„ . 5-_'�'S /-21-7U _':.0 C)J C:Ce P S C ° ' SHrET HO, / Or , „.,....CHKD, DN',. OATI.. �i& 12'a5' AM Pt/sr JO[! Nib. Z Ca7 4/" 7 /&4/ti-l • c ITz. g • Tim/1h .. _ ‘ , .. , , fil /2.4, , 4, ., . • AY 0195 CIT OF TIGARD .� �.� •• N I NG DEPT. I so. . i yiz; Z.) .-- 3/ , 1 . ,. . .... ( anc ,.. ..t\ .._ _ L_______ - . 14 4 s ' _, 4. 7 I t , C ar , VI S . I. ., ' ono 6 ._...A2L..?on - , 2 f 11; • . / r, { s.. 1 /5.-0 1 4 i, . ` `nom+ ._ . C___4„, 1 . , . , i , , ` ► ' +' l ■ 1 t'4- ' varomrams................tp, - ' {19 I 1 ' x 2 .•'�lr[6/rr/� I .... ..i......■.....d..?it P`'� ,... I '......".."""'.".'"'"'".".."71............, ' 6 0� / o )77E. ; rooTiAl G S.A.4xdS r-iiv a . • . r ry • `f Orel Land Title As.ociation ��,' 4j ' � Premium ®„0 0 �` ems' ' 'k.4 y y. j POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY an Oregon corporation, hereinafter called the Company, for a valuable consideration paid for this policy of - title insurance, the number, date, and amount of which are shown in Schedule A, does hereby insure the parties named as Insured in Schedule A, the heirs, devisees, personal representatives of such Insured, or if a corporation, its successors by dissolution, merger or consolidation, against direct loss or damage not exceeding the amount stated 1 `:': in Schedule A, together with costs, attorneys' fees and expenses which the Company may be obligated to pay as provided in the Conditions and Stipulations hereof, which the Insured shall sustain by reason of: 1. Title to the land described in Schedule A being vested, at the date hereof, otherwise than as herein stated; or 2. Unmarketability, at the date hereof, of the title to said land of an y vestee named 4 herein, unless such unmarketability exists because of defects, liens, encumbrances, or v other matters shown or referred to in Schedule B; or Any defect in, or lien or en- 1 cumbrance on, said tide existing at the date hereof, not shown or referred to in Schedule B,or exduded from coverage in the Schedule of Exdusions from Coverage;or 3. Any defect in the execution of any mortgage or deed of trust shown in Schedule B securing an indebtedness,the owner of which is insured by this policy,but only insofar i! as such defect affects the lien or charge of such mortgage or deed of trust upon said land; or 4. Priority, at the date hereof, over any such mortgage or deed of trust, of any lien or . encumbrance upon said land,except as shown in Schedule B such mortgage or deed of ! trust being shown in the order of its priority. all subject, however, to the Schedule of Exclusions from Coverage and the Conditions and Stipulations hereto an- 1' nexed, which, together with Schedules A and B are hereby made a part of this policy. I 2 In witness whereof, TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed and authenticated by the facsimile signatures of its President and Secretary, provided ' this policy is valid only when countersigned by a duly authorized officer or agent of the corporation. I , ?ate Teedoetafeee 6441044y 4 eleitsio J'.:r il p Countersigned BY :1 ••°°•. PRESIDENT /,, A ATTEST 0 SECRETARY thorized Officer ¢t ,,ate ..cs 1 se Qom• i I. „� ®eeeee0°e* . •s .•F 11h • • TI ,,,-. I • f j • • SCHEDULE A • Amount $ 250,000.00 Date June 8, 1978 At 11:42 A.M. INSURED i.r. ---DENNIS C. THO P SON and CHARLES N. KAADY- The estate or interest referred to herein is, at the date hereof, vested in LELAND ARISS and MARTHA LOUISE .ARISE, an estate in fee simple, as tenants by the entirety. 1 I o The land referred to in this policy is described as See EXHIBIT "A" attached ---� t • { f . ii r j • lit, } PAGE 2 OF POLICY NO. 336996 nn f. EXHIBIT "A" Order NO. 336996 Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, ELECTRIC ADDITION TO TIGARDVILLE, according to the duly recorded plat thereof, situated in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon. ALSO, all of Lots 7 and 8, in ELECTRIC ADDITION TO TIGARDVILLE, and ALSO a parcel of land l'Ting in Lot 9, ELECTRIC ADDITION TO TIGARDVILLE, Washington County, Oregon, the said parcel being described as follows: Beginning on the Northeasterly line of said Lot 9 at a point 15 feet Southeasterly from the Northerly corner of said Lot 9; thence South 50° 46 ' East along said Northeasterly line a distance of 25.2 feet to the Easterly corner of said Lot 9; thence South 56° 40 ' West along the Southeasterly line of said Lot 9 a distance of 90.4 feet to the Southerly corner of said Lot 9; thence North 46° 14 ' 30" West along the Southwesterly line of said Lot 9 a distance of 3.5 feet; thence North 42° 47' East a distance of 86.2 feet to the point of beginning. Page 3 of Policy No. 336996 x .. " Oregon Land Title Association $ • Standard Coverage Policy SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage, nor against costs, attorney's fees or expenses, any or all `y of which arise by reason of the matters shown or referred to in this Schedule except to the extent that the owner of any mortgage or deed of trust is expressly insured on page 1 of this policy. 'Y. 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. ':,'a 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records; un • patented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area encroachments or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose. . .. 5. Statutory powers and assessments of Unified Sewerage Agency. 6. Rights of the public in and to any portion of the herein described premises lying within the boundaries of roads or highways. 7. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, granted to Tigard Sanitary District;. recorded August 27, 1957 in Book 397, page 350, Washington County Records. (Affects other property also) . 8. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, granted to . Portland General Electric Company, an Oregon corporation, recorded August 14, 1967 in Book 654, page 559, Washington County Records. (Affects the Northwesterly 15 feet of Lot 8) . 9. Contract, including the terms and provisions thereof, executed by Leland Ariss and Martha Louise Ariss, vendor, to Lyle D. Goodell and Evelyn V. Goodell, as tenants in common, each as to an undivided one- half interest, vendee, dated October 7, 1972, recorded October 10, 1972 in Book 891, page 636, Washington County Records. 10. Memorandum of Contract, including the terms and provisions thereof, executed by Lyle D. Goodell and Evelyn V. Goodell, as tenants in common, each an undivided one-half interest, vendors, to Dennis C. Thompson and ° : i Charles M. Kaddy, as tenants in common, each an undivided one-half . interests vendees, dated June 5, 1978, recorded June 8, 1978 in Fee No. 78-25712, Washington County Records.---- . Page 4 of Policy NO 36996 T-30 . . *. • . ; ..,- : . ,.. . . / .^ . ‘ -: /2 . . ." A „ . \ 460 s•o: e..t.zeo (2d,iu(s) Goo , TIGIV2a) li, 1144 S..I.': .'F o s-r e a. (2'b. P.O. (3 6)( Z-;S0-3 t 1 2/-a. s.o. 9'7 zei. c_,■--c--;) 1 9 Z; 932..-cLAA.Y0 9-4 2.i 4) l..K 900 t_PoJ- , 40ZS, ,.., . • 9Q,--ct,,,t,3 , . . . In w k,01., '%.(XY5 ,., 2 1,00 -. -. = cc)0( KN k,.1 lt\c?,,71„;Q. INTL/),. L furo Co N. s., PL. ,-zci SA). .Ti‘i-V2b. R 0. (107( a2. c,,,,t- , (1.1.2,22, eL.../.-ca ) 9'7-2Z C-1-r,-, 922 l'... '. ..., i • ,.. . 'al.00 2.3,Ca0> a40 ) 0 'ZAN 2402 um ...) Z COT OC-ri L tS I-70 S.U. %)otz\ -v.:- L..). 9.0.(1t..)x- 12. T,c), r ,o)c 23%Z8 '..... tb e•‘et"-.,- 3 CY-4'2:7.- 1,)et,Afv.E 9 70csa C...4-4-.3 , 9.72.2'3 ) , . • -I . - , xv! iota, *L5Lt.../n -Set-co Pc T'E-.2S 541`;1- 1 7(5(46(2 i 1,1-4 2.0 S,U . t-LIVI.)4 i 0 .(::0 .U. EA law\ve.#3 UV 4)-2.00 .t..)•7/6 tit2D • ' . , . , . • : '1500 ''' 5cc 4 Zco 4060 ca-re-a Ozotkilo ( E,,,erz , tOce IA 4.) C4, elNet172/.40 /-141ZOLA ,•* 12.4 C)S ,,t-)- h a,k 3 i 2-S'70 S,O, ?AA;),) /O Z b0, S,0, raQe.oksi-i leE,-- , . - (.4-rb i 9722 1 .._ • w An i 41. O 4 2 0 12 0 S,U. I'M U &3l l LIZ-7-0 0J Cri-,', asck.) C, (.3. /"irk LA IL e- Oot2.0) 9O1 I . ' 43e0 ) 4StO 4400 4705 • 144.)FP63ee./2_ The5PG21 16-5. P..0. 20-1/ *n10)--7. (2e:os c.c.), 9'3 22.1 ..) . , - ... - • • s I . .., . , , . '' , , " , *7*"'" ''T. ...."''.'' "'.**"'.: ''' - " i.- : ''''''''''\ '', ' . ' • , ,' ' ..,'" . •,:.--• .-' Pi. •,,-. ,., "2/ .:•.. H ‘2.! , ..:,.... 4ec53 -490C) 6e3co :,....'... rDe.GE s'e-1-..--.1,) 4c120 N. 2 2U ' ,e0, t4nm crni. ,-,,...., crr,si 1).--4 273 C,717t3 ) 93 22'3 . . . „ ..... ... • .. :.,..,. , tAfk a v fe2-1"70 *T,12/4 )E . -itc,esao P6E1 0 i Go'bei ..,..:,, --,,,, citiss .(.,.‘. OLG-sok) (-2T), 1.2 Z 'S ,,Ct.), PIACjo ..- , . -- .. '?csrzykiko` ) l':)-7.-2:23 6-1-1". i 9 q223 ..., ;., .. ., w = 0 0 0.t '.•'. 4 , ••,..„,... i' . ,-... '2 ••:..- 1 ' ;:',.. . .;...I ',-;'• -;....: ,..,. ...: ."'• -..':, . , .s. ...-,:.• • . , ....,,,-.... . ..,. ....-... .„..,• ......'i-':-. . . . r• t . , .,. .,--it ' .,. • 1,T .. ...,.: , , - ....:--....1, . ..,..., , . .-1.,..... .„,.._........—.' ..',... _~.-__- �� . ,iA ' ` ' ` .�'` � � .-_ � ��~ __ - --~ `- . ' � .+ �� ��` . � � ' .� - NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS � I. ___�` NP0 �o. / ______ CPO 0o. _____ +' `^ � ^ ��' � `'- 2. CITY DEPARTMENTS , ' ^ _ -'/"uilding Inspector "/"Engineering-Randy � ' Engineering-Frank/John _____ Parks and Recreation ~ ____ . city Recorder _ U±her ��� .� 3. SPECIAL DISTRICTS `' _ Tualatin R.F.P.D. . School Dist. No. 48 (Beaverton) ` ______ Washington Co. F.D. No. I School Dist. Nn. 23J (Tigard) |��l / 2 � `v _____ Tigard W.D. Other r\ � ' Metzger W.D. 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS __ City Council Boundary Commission ''^'. ______ Planning Commission METRO '�'�� ��' � _____ Planning Department , Other ^ ' �" , ' Waah.Cn. Land Use & Tranm.Dept. ,.�. . 5. STATE AGENCIES Aeronautics Div. (0D0T) DOQAMI �' , .., Engineer Division of State Lands ..' Board of Health _____ Commerce Dept. - M.H. Park � - Highway Dix. - Terry Flink Fish & Wildlife �� ^`% / . Parks & Recrea. Div. (ODOT) LCDC �' _____ Subdivision Supervisor PUC ______^`� Dept. of Energy _____ Fire Marshall ' _ _ Dept. of Environ. Quality Other ___ . \` � ' ., 8. FEDERAL AGENCIES z , Corps of Engineers Other ` _ _ _ , ______ Pnut Office . . l`' � .‘r--` 7, SPECIAL AGENCIES , '�. ______ General Telephone Portland General Electric Pacific Northwest Bell Other �' _____- -~ . , Northwest Natural Gas ` . - ' ^' ~```` ��� /. � �' J j • • ?/Q+ a ' fi . �."Ter r�� °// T?r 1 900 e . . i �.. .N ,,e4 Is'? .4, 1902 . -•.. 7;ct n . ,.. c� `•`' ....:. , 'eV A ' t • 03. A / ENDD AC '0' .....,.. . ..., � . ' • ' ®° 12 „ -10 I• • J se ‘p, t F ,,. , „44 s„,,,,. -1•1,:„..,..„ ••'..N.,...,..,... , N) 0. N Y. ` 330C ., • . \\"/". S 0 ' ,I,41S1)7.,;:.k" 6,;',,, ---ni.., • , , O''''0, sp.1),;*-::ft i 1 \''.<?\, " ):(0 .-"'' lb,e,'''' .., \ ,',la -' ' Atilltifilfil 1 4,,,,C1 ...<4?*c .,,,,.,-;:-.-'-'0.'' ,'''' '' ' ''\ 01, ' ..- .. . co?, <>/: ,xc) ti- ,.,... . .66„4 c. ,,e ., :, ('\c). '1'6' \6.',.. V \ ''' ■■A �+ E \•, 01/. \ /II IF ,' .._ ''',1 t.:',. . $4—°•.,• .4 0 ''.2‘''57(24' vtiN", \ \ ...... go ri 'a0o '.,,DP$ 2400 ";414 `8 4• 4 {�O • ' .. - / 11I / 4A6� . zr. At 1 '` f.' • it e� Qr • �� `x t a,rs, o 1111 i o'° l0 '- '0i iff.' ,: / Rd.01 , ' +t''P�1 .t 1561.7 N 32°551.E TO±� �,. N.E.CORNER OF THE If ° eb� ,,j2Ac +p,'4"' ti'?.r -. SOUTH 1®?Or JOHN // aµ @i7RNHA TRACTS f' 0 'd 1: ,• 1f:101211kF .a• ,,•0. t 4. SEE MAP '''' .• - ..,,,,V . . :-,, 2,S 1 2 AC - c•, h • • adz ! Sz dVW 33S '017 08' 10£5 bvz 1 SZ 'd V tN 33S 'rvb5 009£ Zen l 'ON'S {l '. . . . , ..„.,, . . , ,.. -..... i , . . . : erk.A c %t OF --(kAN cv p\A t.A-roa4 Fo/2., p S.IC.,IQ cc vzY-G-- G x(-GPI-kW S "Mg-ek) C-frgotA- CC,1-1(.5.-) i C3- k t4 ,. OS' or' m e Co m..etwhii-ry VEkiet.oPma .,.„ ( c La k--(''S12 kiN 1 . kio T) , . '-. . ra.. -c.,4E 92c.)E'oeFT:t -E:r(...„G el"(L -1 -ro Tki e 14G tC,FAT Lie-t 1-r ( J -r4e- gv---4•) .. .... e..cyDG t%, t,i c--Cec. A\12.\\) --i-6 1,-AAka* -774e- Sifz-NJ (.../(1.-.tra L.c.: Rao f.-1 -r-4 e- 7.: s--\-,e.e el' ri'le LA k.r.,..t..-- O -Ti4E- "VD POG e A ??4-1.3 OF 77.7,L E 5.:›cr-E,, („„, --'5,-)F-2.e" tc. Ro r.,,e../.....css 'be%■..1 Lc- u..)[-A-ICA S CO)to,-.--,.s, -n..2E-- . ..,*. . .... . (3,p.. s'...c- )■c...0 is, ere- . ..,.. x -r. ,.3 c rilt..) .0.3 E.s-Q, O . c eau(cc, i& Loc.,pti-6.-0 clik..1. 0 4 . ."- i..... '-:• C 4 1 2 ' -.---- 4 l'az .- 2.1 4 Val Q.Z-o c I-0(41'71F CAP-w14. (4, e-,i.C7-to- 11-4E- prpj o -r-tact, StC,tO 5-W-rec. PAJC`1k-Ne(2.. _CC a'1/43t.‹.14....-.- *rrs,P--\.- Tr&Atzeo AR.L( :-...: ?L)2,LIC,.. . OL-Toouc,o- --ri4e2-e- 00 kt-kfrott\f-clE SU(t-711).)(3% 0$1.-c/2.uc,--c-to 6. 1 74 v"- i.)1 et...11 we" , e e SI- -17-Apry -1-,415 -7"..Dif'obg,Np lie.-r, (:) jut4u) ..-c 5,,y-i -1--,.. v. L 0 C-fk-rdbLs Or- 14G C3-1-A-i7t.u.) ( l...eK,Prr C.% 1,-. 4N. t.,ou.) .-...1 e) -VA c- S-C12-zelc P4,.), ), e,...caN)ep..,e-T) ") loe e...et..3"(-CA--c- S. -r-11:- - • t.. 00-(...0 Dok 1--6E.Lo.3 G. -7:4 il-c crrA-re" ,) Li (4-but..1 , ' ... e...E&C., 2k 6- -r-i120 mil IA, s--i--, A . N..1 K.) '-^1,..\ risi tA01-k9S, ) -1-0.e. St(...Q el.-', U 14.t G Le - ' '5oTA E.PsA.rrsPk.,-; Nor) Li ev..arCEP.C.\ '77-/E- PIC,'CliA)- oP 'C.,N. a k,,41!).A..c.4 g v-V),. . , CC t'i-M-ON.)v"I'Y -1-i-Vv-C. --Ct(9.1V1:> ABA IN-(0(2,18,-. --,--, ce FE(2... 1-044 j C-.\.a Lo cs.,p,0.- Liz1/41-,.....x.-, -(-0 -1746 - --r.'t.. $a Y 1.3.)10-) -l ) L.)(.. '171A-1- (2,E7 r-biZel.-- .. , - '' --rte"vz"" f",,r' '\-• vik(:),\)po..... .1e..,-4,-.) , Ps.''OU Sg.-ro,t,,,..1c.- C s.o(....i4 f, ‘,.,, (.) z'' tr-b(2, C....R.1/4.)V% ti‘i '''C 6 A-1Z-0 '1DA- 'I, ') ., C)0 L•.? k.,..11A,A-7,` (.3 e. i.--Qh -ro oFFei2 j ( O' { %-SO ,, itSY rDe....■thoc), --r\--\(2.o mo,‘,Q .-1-*.Q c....---e-7, tAl 04--i- stecok.Lz epoL.k.,1.-7z3 <k:C,{Narc i..40%,' 1-7, cy-t:F 6:(2, CO t•,)0 r‘A c.- P‘-'0\)PO-INGeS lb iTAN.A.16.37c.)t..,..1&) t-(At.i‘,.) 4 1-2 e--c .. l - \ 1, C42 0/60A/(0.3 .,1 ‘,6 C_ Fe Ek... -IH :PE:ce to 6,36.\0 - I Kszlk)41,..1.-(A6E OF- 00g. %a Co(ce s k-,-+) .': -.•, oP 5....otk_e op -1,4 0,c--,A41 a_ 1.4ops....m.3-1.. , sa201c.c,--„, , --R41%. alio 1 _ IV?pxoc.i.Pri-6. C,..1...t.NsS WSk.x. V.V.:7 rak3c tp4 ec.c> Age IN 4 ASD we ooc2:1 ''•-... . . , •... 1 . t. : . . - .,. . . , :i � ��.. ,.�:., :' N ..,. C�A"t l: /- 1;u r3J;:cT c.": \ S t 0 ••• •• ..... HC7 C�,..... .... OF CH-HKD. c►,•„_„ DATE ,U 121a5- /d/4/4/ Sr J 0 0 tN©. 2.6 el4 ♦It.nw ,'t. • -, '” -° �. v 2 coo NJ Re le ,r , a, , >b f. v /2LL .,.•\-.' , : „: 3,,i 1/2.: 8 LJ (\j.S.-1 c, . , . ,, ........7)._..(7_,....,i • ...,. e y. Lay . 2 ____62.___K?r_ , CI) v -^ `• 5-M- ' ( 1 �F --�..,.,..p>: , i . , ., . ,.. i �.:z,: . -Pac5c. `C 7 Y ' , (----+ I / A • r pie ILL 1 I 1 4 0 ',. at .. - .. - ..' -.- ..... _.'•._ .�.. .. .. .. .. .. �. ........ . .... .... .. _ � .. thA ice. A/Ole. 43:41 s ` tc/1F/En4p .>7"'.Z / Q07-1,/vG —4-xis ///G u' , - - .,-' - * j.-.'''''''',,-;,..,'-'...,,FT-:-..,,`-74-7-z• .,-,,,,:::-,„ r --. --_-'',.f....., , . .. ' • - - - , ,. . • , - _ . ..,....:. _.. . ._ .,- A'- .."::,:.: -",-..•-•'"--:.,. '- - '''-' ', ' ' " _' -. . . _ .., .„. -r, ._ -,- , ., .fil C) _ • - ' .:_.-:--.. :-::.:,,'..;11;,,-.;:':,--:;.',?-2::;;:;:::,.4,:;;C,?1:22:',..--,..;;;;4.:,=;,!!:il!:',,-:::-„:,'.•--,;11.:'.., 1, , , , vi'., .1 ,, ,rt ikT L-1,--'-', -.1:,,-t k(,...:14 t j)_:ki.,„7:.,,;,--,-.:,-,4-.'-.;,,':;.-1.-...i_ ,...': ' ..,,, :0, ,z,--.1,::: Lt-- 11 ..,::- _,,„- '`0,,,,- -'•-,`.-.'.' :,:-,--; -`..,:--.„.:--,,.,_.- '-- • '• ' ' 1' - ' ' ..-' ,-, '--•-„,,-.:-..,,:,-, ,:-:.- , jc-r...',„..,- .1 i,,,,,„;-..,,,-;---,-, -- ,.-- i„ - ' - - -,. 0,-: ,0 8-,,:::-, ;,,,,,..,.- ,. _ . ,.1...,,,..-, "-' '41 ' ,_ . ._ ,. c:-.,--',---,'0', , -cr..,4 tAN't -- 7. I 2 --,,..r..2.,..,, !::::,,, ,.:-.. - - 1:,'..fv_: - :::—, _ - - - . . q. - i t:: relc-cu 0 Ec., -03, 4 _ '..; IC4,irrcol-‘ (1'\-i c)c) 1)3 - „ . i, 1 ' - .: . 1 ;;.. . .3-.3. i,-L 'TA 14:%-z.kl ft!:. -.. r....._—, . -::!:c,,,..e. ,.. : . T-.y i',..,-. - 7)(..)f‘kl, (-) CCASIT - I 2 c-3(X) i 1„ - P..-'S-)4 7 C -!74'Lk..t. P.,'''::. 1:-.,.tt:A..) .(.2(..7 Pr C '4'1 c .P'')I:4Z',... ;".143-t- '' ---;) . _ _ - — - :1,_.--::,..• •:, .2-, - I I 1 ,-, ,..... . . ...-.7 i ...Lills . ., ......................,,,...............---*...........--..r....., „..,......................—.........1.--.-7:77—,..±_-_—*- o . - -, { .•.$;--,-': ",--j ' .:- ' - , • g-;.::;,-,-, -, -,;.- - - - .. . m, • i , ..... --t — x .1,q•E .... , ) """' 1 S133MS 001 li3VZ7 1 4,011&40' —. : . ., , .,. ,:.,.-..,,•-,,,,,,.. -,-,.:,-.:-,•-, ..,..,--,-...:>?;-;,-e':::::;`,...::i.:,..;:;.:4-,. .: r:Z-4 ' -' - • -.. '..i‘ ,"-' -....,"--.77..."VW 7 .• 77 '1, ,.. • ,. ‘.. .,...f, ., ''.' • ..ff . . • . . '-.- ..:. . •••tik ;.,. . . •, , \ ...,• •. 6,,, iit)1,,, /..- . .. ....., — 4 ,...,, ...,... ,,,,,,,,,,,,•04. v...;;;45--,..1-,t If,',,,,—, i:04 1 1 , — ejr),13, ,,,..,,,,, • '''''C'''''' f•e•...- i Z,4,1::: .''-')';-'31.,77,)15,, ..-,'L ,V-_,,,,c,„)" ,,,,,, ......., .... .,-, ,,,-, , QApp- / k: .•._ - %.,..,• :. , ..•. I• ,'_ 1. , ...: 1.. 1 . i .. ,,'.-,...• , . ..- ;-...7. , .. . . c I . .. ... . -,....- .... .. , - ... . . . .. ... ' . 4 f .. t' ':''''. I, 1' •. i - i , . . : • .• 3 ' ' ' •...'',,,, ' • i,g '',,,,, ( '.,. i-',• •.., -„," , • . , . . „ . •. . .