SCE4-83 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
-,"°741,7747-4444wwww• ,, , ..,,_. _ _ .
•
:::„.-±':•':?„ m:47!)...-;.4:4,,q.p.,:,1:-,..1,1,40,,,:,,-,f....!;:„,,,,N,,,epiv,..41:41,:4,0.,..g.t.,,,.i.:?,,,,,,,,,,!,,,,i4,..,..„,,4:,,i1„,,,,, .
Ramsay Signs SCE 4-83 t ,
,. • 1, I
First Interstate Bank 11760 SW Hall
,, . ,.., ,, ,....,._-____,./....,.„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,...,...„,,..-..,.,.,.,...,.....,...,..,......,...,„....,.,....:....,..,..,,....,„...„.„;.,....,...„-................„,..„.„,„........,,,,,_,,....,„:„„,,,,,...._,...,....--..,,,,,,,,,......--,„,„-„,,....,,,,...,.....-.4....„,"..,..,,,,,,,,,,,,-...,,,,..-,X,4'.444,4....4.4414,4,14•44.44,4,14,..••4-,,.444.,---:-4.-^*4-.:-4:4-::-.44.1.-•-'4,,,---44.,,-4..4.:44,-•:-,4:44•41, •
\ 4
.,.
. .1
. .,
.,
. .
.. ,.)
i
: .., .
.... ,,,
.:,
, . f
,‘ ..• I
, , 1
. ,.
..,
. ,,
,f
L''' ';■
:1
1. • ',', ,
,• .
;,,, .• ,,• .
,; 7•,:. ,
. ,
,•../t". ,
. f
,
1...'n,", •: i
. i
• .,..,1; ' ■
;/ 1
, . I-• I.'
. ..4,‘'••
• .
I,
•,, : i
. I
../
.,,
' .. •?•
-,,
,..
• ,. ;
. ;
.. .!
. .. r
.. .
. . 4
1
1
r .'
1
. .
, 4
I 4
. I.
. . .)
. ...
? , ,
I ,
4 1.
i , I
. ,
. . • , . . . • ,.": . r 4 •i . :
CITY OF TWA 11040'
WASHiNGION COUNtt OttgrobN
NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION
1. The final decision was filed by: Ti . .441 . I 414111' '04
Concerning SCE 4-83 on _Egiambar_j5, 19n
Case Number Date
2. Name of Owner: First InIesatala_BAWL.
3. Name of Applicant: .4 e It
Address 4835 NE Pacific . City Portland State oR
4. Location of Property:
•
Address • 1460 SW Hall Blvd,
Legal Description •
5. Nature of Application: signo thaELIVItate
__Rank in to be raised from 26 feet to 34 pr 36 feet.
6. Action: I Approval as reqUested
• I Approval with conditions
tI Denial •
7. Notice: *Notice was published in the newspaper & was mailed to:
x The applicant & owners
• ,
OWner8 of record within the required distance
1 i The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization
F1 Affected governmental agencies
If there are questions regarding the names of the persons or agendies Who
received notice, this information is available at the Plahning Department.
8. Pinal Decieico!
,
The adopted findings of facts decisions and t4ateme)it of condition can be
obtained from the Planning Director, City of 1,Lgard, City Hall, 12/55 SW
• Ash, P,O. 8oX 23597, Tigard; Oregc. :7225.
In the case of a decision oh an application for a Variahce) the applicant
mu8t acknowledge this form and return it to the City of Tigard i Planning
birectori before any building permits will be issued or engiheerihg approVal
giVeh.
. 1 Signature of ,Cpplicant or Applicant'8 Agent Date
9. Appeal: An appeal ri has been filed has not been filed.
Note: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance
with Section 18.84.250, which provides that a written appeal may
be filed within fourteen days after notice is given and sent.
Notice is given on Novemmber Ia,. ig83 , therefore the deadline
for filing of an appeal is December 2 , X83
10, Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard
Planning Department, 639-4171
•
•
a nl:w... YM N.:Mpi . w W.••YEM.'WUYw+i w,..nmy .,py.
•
•, 1
' 1
'I 1
4
.1•I
1,
T I G A R D P L A N N I N G C O M M I S S I O N
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 15, 1983
1. President Tepedino called the meeting to order at 7:38 P.M. . The meeting
,` Y was held at Fowler Junior High School - LGI Room - 10865 SW Walnut,
Tigard, Oregon
f
2. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: President Tepedino, Commissioners Butler, Moen,
Edin, Leverett, Fyre, Owens.
ABSENT: Commissioner Vanderwooa (one vacant position) .
STAFF: Associate Planner Elizabeth Newton (left 8:15);
Assistant Planner Steve Skorney; Director of
Planning and Development Monahan (arrived 8:10) ;
Secretary Diane Jelderks.
' A
3. Minutes from October 4, 1983, were considered. Commissioner Edin moved
and Commissioner Fyre seconded to accept the minutes as submitted. The
motion carried by unanimous vote of members present.
4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION
d4
o Respresentative from the Washington County Fire Department, Craig
Keyes, and Tualatin Fire District, Joe Gruelich, were present to
discuss issues of mutual concern:
Commissioner Owens arrived
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
o President Tepedino opened the i
public hearings by reading the
procedures to be followed during the hearing.
5.1 SIGN CODE EXCEPTION SCE 3-83 Wayside inn NPO # 4
A request for an exception gfrom the sign .b bode
per allow the placing of
an additional free-standing sign, 100 in
9
height, to identify the Wayside hotel. The property is designated'
General Commercial and is zoned C-5. Located: 11460 SW Pacific Hwy.
Associate Planner Newton made staff's rocommendation for approval
with two conditions,
o NPO/COI COMM
, .} ENTS - No one appeared to speak.
o APPLICANT'S PRESENTATYQNi Way 'Lee; Owner of the Tayside 'Motel
explained it was their intent to remove the other two signs and
re lace them with . ,,. . .r. ��� t
p t tthe �.arger,� taller sign. e did not feel that
staff's recommendation was sufficent for his needs because the canopy
at the mobil station 4dUld still block the view of the sign,
n �
PUBLIC TESTIMONY - No one appeared to speak.
CROSS EXAMINATION AND REBUTTAL
o Discussion followed regarding the need for the height of the sign to
be30ft.
o Commissioner Owens questioned if the picture showing the new sign had
been done to scale. The applicant stated that it was.
o Commissioner Edin questioned the ownership of the vacant land between
the highway and the Motel. Mr Lee stated that the land was owned by
the state and added to his visual problem. Further discussion
followed.
o Director of Plw ing and Development stated that staff would have no
problem with a cr,: to 30 ft. sign as long as the need is met with the
minimum height necessary. Further discussion regarding height.
o President Tepedino was concerned because the Commission had denied a
eimiliar request for a Shell Service Station on Greenburg Road and
217. Discussion followed as to how that request was different.
o Commissioner Butler asked the applicant if they had done precise
measurements to assure that 30 ft. was the minimum they required.
Bob Fulton, sign representative, stated they had used a fiberglass
pole and tape measure to determine that they needed the 30 feet.
o Further discussion followed regarding the size and height of the sign.
•' . PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
•:r
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
conflicted
with the recommendation for denial of the next sign code
o Commissioner Edin expressed his concern for approval,or �g code
exception on the agenda.
o Commissioner Owens, .everett and Moen favored the size and height of
the sign proposed
used by the applicant.
o Commissioner Fyre felt a 24i height might be Cufficient
«'
approved.
• Chairman n.
Tepedino felt because of the safety issue the sign should be
� o CiOC[linlsSlon ben moved and Commissioner
Code d Owens seconded to approve' Sign
Exception SCE 3-83 with the following conditions.
• ' 1. The applicant shall remove the two existing signs.
• 2. The sign height shall not be geater than 30 feet.
3, taximem area for the sigh will be no more than too sq.
ft,, , with the major sign being no more than 90 iq, ft. .
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 150 1983 Page 2
The motion carried by majority vote of Commissioners present.
President Tepedino, Commissioner Moen, Leverett, Owens and Butler
voting YES. Commissioners Fyre and Edin voting NO.
5.2 SIGN CODE EXCEPTION SCE 4-83 NPO # 2
A request to allow the 6' x 12' First Interstate Bank sign to be
raised from 26 ft. to 34 or 36 £t. high.
o Assistant Planner Skorney made staff's recommendation for denial.
o NPO/CCI COMMTS - No one appeared to speak.
o APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION - No one appeared to speak.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
o No one appeared to speak.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
o Commissioner Fyre, Moen, and Leverett support staff's recommendation.
o Commissioner Edin was concerned with denial because of the previous
approval.
1
I o Commissioner Owens commented that there was a difference because of
the type of business of each applicants. The bank's sign need was
less because it attracted most ly people who are local. However in
the case of the motel you are attracting out of town people who need
to be able to find you.
o Commissioner Butler moved and Commissioner Moen seconded to deny Sign
Code e Exception SCE 4-83 based on staff findings and recommendation,
The motion was approved ioncr>pproved by a unanimous vote of Comzniss present,
RECESS 8:40 P.M.
RECONVENE 8:55 P.M.
5.3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 1'7.-83
ZONE CHANGE Z... ,,
C 1353 Marvin Smith NPO 0 6
o Assistant Planner s
the app :icant's re korney made staff's recommendation for approval of
quest.
o 'Director of Planning '.'.
g
. �n and Developiset�t explained why this item is
' I
before the Planning again.
o NPOICCt COMMENTS -- staff stated that they had talked with NPO
hairman, Phil Pasteris and that he had eonveyed that the NPO had
heard this applicant's request several times and supported the
request.
PLANNING' COMM1ssICN MitiuTgS November i5f 1083 Page 3
h•
r ,
•
o APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Dean Werst, Attorney for the applicant,
supported staff's recommendation. He added they would be dedicating
approximately 14 acres of land to the City.
o Henry Wong, Developer stated he was available to answer any questions
•. regarding the development. '
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
o Sally Thomas, 16575 SW 85th, owner of the Dairy Farm east of the
propoed site, opposed the application: She stated there is already
a traffic problem and this development would only increase the
problem: She did not feel the site was a suitable location for a
development of this type because of the terrain and flooding that
occurs. She then read a letter from Tom and Jeannie Perin, 16585 SW
92nd, who also opposed this application,
CROSS EXAMINATION AND REBUTTAL
o Commission Butler asked how they had come up with 174 units.
Director of Planning and Development stated the units were not an
issue for this hearing.
o Commissioner Moen questioned the effect on policy 6.1.1 on this
application. Discussion followed.
•
o Commissioner Edin questioned if the applicant would have access on
92nd or on 85th. Mr. Werst explained the access would be on 92nd at
the top of the hill, because the 85th access was not wide enough. He
also explained how they had come up with the figure of 174 units.
o Discussion followed regarding density, the letter from USA and street
improvements for SW 92nd.
o Commissioner Moen suggested approving the proposal With a Planned
Development overlay.
o Mag Shaw, 16225 SW 93rd Avenue Was concerned with the effect 20 units
would have on the areas k". what p
per acre w . asked wha would revent
them from building apartment oraputtlilgainuaamobil home park if this
density was approved:
o Director of Planning and Development Monahan stated i .
fated the application j
1
l
l
wo
e
if approved would only allow 12 units
. �. per acre with a density trans
for °u in the Planned Development and the other issue would be •
rr to a miximum of 15 units d t
raised during h p Subdivison application
process.
o Discussion fol� regarding ,. . .
lowed the LCDC re uirement of 10 units per
q
acre.
s +c r . _.
development this . � density, geasible to
o Commissioner Fyne asked at low da economically Drectorof Planning and
p property+
Development stated it would be difficult because of the amount of
tnbuiidable lands.
o Lengthy discussio n' n regarding . .
' chai�,ging the A density from low to mediums
PUNNING oo %issio-
' i ld WlNbTgS November 15, 1983 Page
•
•
•
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
o Commissioner Edin moved and Commission Leverett seconded to forward a
recommendation of approval to the City Council for the Comprehensive
Plan Amendment CPA 17-83, from low to medium density; and approval of
the Zone Change ZC 13-83 to become effective upon Council approval of
the Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
The motion was approved by unamious vote of the Commissioners present.
5.4 SUBDIVISION S 9-83 Bond Park # 2 NPO # 5
op Assistant Planner Skorney made staff's recommendation for approval
with conditions.
o NPO/CCI COMMENTS - No one appeared to speak,
• APPLICANT"S PRESNTATION - Bill McMonagle, 8905 SW Commercial, stated
they had reviewed the staff report and had no problems. They were
available to answer any questions.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
o No one appeared to speak.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
o Commissioner Butler was concerned that there was no school impact
statement submitted with the application. The applicant stated they
had contacted the school and that they had no problems with the
proposed development.
o Commissioner Owens moved and Commissioner Moen seconded to approve
subdivision 8 9-83, with conditions, the applicant's request for a
Preliminary Plat of Bond Park 0 2, a 24 lot sUbdivision.
The motion was approved by majority vote of Commissioners present)
Commissioner Bdtler voting NO.
•
5,5 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT S 8-83 PD Park Place/Century 21 Homes NPO # 3
o A request for conceptdai and detailed plan approval of a Planned
Development consisting of 215 single family units,
o Assistant Planner gkorney made staff's recommendation for approval of
the conceptual and detailed plan with conditions, They are also
asking for preliminary plat approval, however staff had not responded
in the staff report to that issUe, Also, staff had received a Call
from Washington county requesting that the application be tabled
until the alignment for Gaarde Road could be agreed upon between the
city and Washington CoUnty, the Public Works Directer also
supported a continuance,
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 15, 1083 Page 6
o NPO/CCI COMMENTS -- Bob Bledsoe, 11800 SW Walnut, NPO # 3 Chairman
also supported having this item continued: The NPO had many
concerns which had not been address including alignment of streets
and density calcuations.
o
APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION - Bob Miller, 5164 Bobs Court, Salem, Civil
Engineer for Century 21 Homes. Reviewed the history of the
application noting communication problems which had occurred.
o Lengthy discussion followed regarding processing of the application.
Consensus of the Commissioners was that the there were many difficult
issues to deal with and there was confusion as to staff's position on
this application.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
o Mrs. Rodde, 13745 SW 121st, read her letter into the record opposing
the proposed road alignment and requesting the application be denied.
o Mr. Gordon Moore, 13535 SW 121st, opposed the proposed application.
He stated that Washington County had planned to put the Gaarde Road
Extension through the Century 21 Property and that Century 21 was
aware of this s when the y purchased the property. Mow, Century 21 is
proposing shifting the burden onto his property and others without
even contacting them.
o Ray Barnum, 14405 SW Hazeihill Drive, respresenting the homes owners
in the Bull. Mountain area opposed the application because of the
density and the gaarde/Murray Road extension.
•
o Discussion followed regarding continuance of the meeting.
o Commissioner Edin moved and Commissioner Owen seconded to table
Planned Development S 8-83 PD to December 6, 1983, and requested
staff to schedule a meeting between Washington 'County, City Staff,
Applicant, NPO # 3 and affected parties to address issues of
concern. Also requested applicant to provide de a true school impact
statement:
the motion was approved by Unanimous vote of Commissioner present.
6. OTHER BUSINESS
o Discussion followed regarding developing criteria for ;justifying
changes to the Comprehensive Plan.
A
74 Meeting Adjourned 11:30 P.M.
_J
Diane ....._. ............. .
M. Jelderks, Secretary
ATTEST:
Francis J. Tepee,ino, President
0227P)PLANNING CotrsstoN MINDTEB November 13, 1983 Page 6
�f
•
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM 5.2
T"IGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 15, 1983 - 7:30 P.M. . .
FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL - LGI Room
10865 SW Walnut - Tigard, Or.
A. FINDINGS OF FACT
1. General Information
CASE: Sign Code Exception SCE 4-83 NPO # 2
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a sign code exception to allow
the 6' x 12' First Interstate Bank sign to be raised from
26 ft. to 34 or 36 ft. high.
ZONING DESIGNATION: C-5
RECOMMENDATION: Based on information submitted by the applicant,
staff's review of applicable municipal code
provisions, and field investigation, staff
recommends denial of SCE 4-83.
APPLICANT: Ramsey Signs Inc. OWNER: First Intersate Bank
4835 N.E. Pacific 1.1760 SW Hall Blvd.
Portland, Or: 97213 Tigard, Oregon
•
LOCATION: 11760 SW Hall Blvd.
1
NPO COMMENT: NPO # 2 is inactive at this time.
2. Background„
in permit issued for a wall sign 100
• � On February 23, 1979, a sign erma.t was is
sq0 ft. in area and 18" in height. On February 6, 1981, a sign
permit was issued for a free-standing sign, 72 sq. ft. in area and 26
feet in height:
B. STAFF AtAILYSIS AND REVIEW!
The Tigard Municipal Code allows for exception to the sigh code as follows:
. i
l may grant p ` Planning Commission or on review, the Council
ma rant ecce ptions to the requirements of this tit
6.3 :0� EXCEPTIONS ��;e
Pia
nn�.n Co'
q , when the applicant
demonstrates that, owing to special or unusual circumstances relating to
the design, structure) or placement of the sign in relation to other
structures or land uses or the natural features of the land, the literal
• interpretation of this title would interfere with the cone unicative
function of the sign without corresponding public benefit in terms of the
values set forth in the TMC Section 18059,010.
•
•
M
16.36.040 COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONES. C-3 , C-3M, C-5; and M-2, M-3
and M-4 industrial zones.
Free-standing signs shall have certain limitations and conditions when
permitted on properties zoned commercial and industrial. One multifaced,
• free-standing sign identifying the principal goods, products, facilities
or services available on the premises, shall be permitted on the premises,
f subject to conditions and limitations as stated herein. A readerboard
assembly may be an intergral part of the free-standing sign.
Free-standing signs.
Areas Limits. The maximum square footage of signs shall be seventy square
feet per face or a total of one hundred forty square feet for all sign
faces. No part of any free-standing sign shall extend over a property
line into public right-of-way space.
Area Limit Increases. The sign area may be increased one square foot for
each lineal foot the sign is moved back from the front property line thy:
sign is adjacent to. If the street is curbed and paved the measurement ',
may be taken from apoint which is fifteen feet from the pavement. This
increase in sign area is limited to a maximum of ninety square feet per
•
face or a total of one hundred eighty square feet for all faces.
height Limits. Free-standing signs located next to the public
right--of-way shall not exceed twenty feet in height. Height may be
•'!
increased one foot in height for each ten feet of setback from the,
property line or a point fifteen feet from the edge of pavement wic
line never
is less to a maximum of twenty-two feet in height.
STAFF COMMENTS
An exception from the height limit for a free-standing sign within a
commercial zone is being requested.
The First Interstate Bank sign is currently 26 feet in height. This is
six feet over the maximum allowable height for ' a free-standing Sign
a located next to a public right-of-*ay. The applicant would like to extend
the height of the sign to 34 or 36 feet.
The applicant has not provided reasonable justification for a sign code
exception. Basd on a field investigation, staff feels that the current
sign has good visibility along S.W. Pacific Highway (see attachment). If
the Planning Commission approves this sign code exception, a precedent
will be set for future applicants that do not have businesses fronting on
SW pacific Highway.
The Planning Commission should also weigh the benefits to the community
when allowing the additional sign against the effect on the intent of the
Site t)esign Review Provisions listed here:
1.8. 2L910 Pur os of ray` .. s� Purpose of
. The intent and ur osn of design review
is to pirotttote the general: welfare by encouraging attention to site
planning and giving regard to the natural environtnenL, t eative project
design and the character of the neighborhood or area.
STAPP REPORT 5Ch 4L-83 Page 2
i '
(a) It is in the public interest and necessary for the promotion of the
safety, convenience, comfort and property of the citizens of the city
of Tigard:
1. To preserve and enhance the natural beauties of the land and of
the man-made environment, and enjoyment thereof;
•
2. To maintain and improve the qualities of and realtionships
between individual buildings, structures, and the physical
developments which best contribute to the amenities and
attractiveness of an area or neighborhood;
• 3. To protect and insure the adequacy and usefulness of public and
private developments as they relate to each other and to the
neighborhood or area; '
4. To insure that each individual development provides for a
quality enviromment for the citizens utilizing that development
as well as the community as a whole.
b. In order to prevent the erosion of natural beauty, the decay of
environmental amenities and the dissipation of both usefulness and
function, it is declared necessary:
1. To stimulate creative design for individual buildings, groups of
buildings and structures, and other physical developments;
2. To encourage the innovative use of materials, methods and
techniques;
3. To integrate the functions, appearances and locations of
buildings imp
s and improvements menu so as to best achieve a balance
between private prerogatives and preferences, and the public
interest and welfare. (Ord.. 77-25 Sc e : 10 (part), 1977).
staff feels that the proposed sign adversely affects the intent and purpose of
this design review criteria.
STAFF k1EC0 iMCNDATION:
•
Staff recoimrikends denial of SCE 4-83
FFtEPARFD 13 APPROVED 13' t
•
r.
rSill�am A� M /61////9
SteVe Skorney3 Monahan)
Assistant Planner Director of planning and Development
(0224?)
STAFF kI f'okr 8C 4-83 Page 3
s .
. .-. --iz.:. • _. _ .
.t - . ' . .• _ - , . ■ - :.• .• .• ' - . _ : . .•- •.. - - ; • . .__ -•_- . .._ ... . .. .;_ . _ ,..'. - ... _ - .._.i,. .__ . .,„....,
- t- , .
% ,
- C -,-17,F cA.Ark-4- ___ -1 c.--
- ...., , - (--,uva , %t-- --\ I.vr\--c.C S*,k--1-e
u n 0-65+rutc--4--e-A,— U s 65 -
---f.t-'0vvy c. t--cz c-- k
. „ \\...., \
,j 1. ,
, I P• i
. = _ •• : ---7-- 77--c\t- ( C-\\\ \' „ \
• \c- • \
\ .N. •
(-V- i
t -, _ '
( • \
1 .
ro I)
`.-3:-
_
- N, •:-
1 \ -
, .
\c:-.
-., ti. - Alp: vvvcrc. . f• \ '-i- - \
• 7 .t t., '- \\j , 1
"-----''. . .. - -- . :k\1 , -1"-- \ - 17 \ \ X \ ‘,, ,,_. ,-- 1
I- ,..1.-
# k - -
.., \,/ \ ___, ......
I: k .. - ,
ZG 9- EI
k\\ A,1 r:,---- '.. ` \ c, .
:.,. ..„ U \ -2 ' 2
--i--: - Tc-- 3_t ..
- .. _ \\ , .., ...., s ----
t.= . : . ------ -- ,
_
t .. P- A. RKIN: G A.R E A. \., -__ /'
- •
1
i' .
—---7
--, r. ..- ..
. _
•
* If r \,,,/ Z.'' ' .' 7-2____.0,,„.--/- ---- ---.•-1:- _ 0 3.''.)- \' ,.. - c'\
-- -="----------" — -_____„....■___.■--- .-:: - --.. (Mii)k i
rh. --3----,—...... .........._......................_............,. . \ . C
/ ..................-----
/. -------- -----_-_-_-_-_-..-------_-_-_-4:--- -_-...:. ''''''N
. - ----•---'-------..... .., ..... ....:::,-- ,..-. _,,/-\ .
, . ... -. .... .. -,..... ....„,,, ........ .. ..,..... ....,
:..
'
S y , /-/4/1 7 -'-:-, • •.
-------.-- ,N\ - '2/(7--------7-77\■ .\\\,
////7, / h .,/.// . .0'' -5----C) c •--- ,.:.2--->7`'._ --" -
77(if '-- - ,_ -
•-•--.,- -
-
, .
7 /fillitt . -
. ' ..- .
( Ill i ii '
PAVED
\ 1 !•. i 1. Ikrta.
' _
I 1 i
..... I 0 1111 'I " ,1 I 1 *'z.--
7 1 ', 46 P A 14.-K 1 N G
. - \--,
, tlfrill' .II"' 04V ED -
'jot, ijill'r. .f. I ...
/..----N\----\-- -
- f . 0 t•Tt H \‘,\ k•\\ \ ............,
1 • -
„,-----\ ,i f■
\------------\,__ _____,
. •-_.; \tV ' -Al \ , ,
...0..........___ - :
)•.,,,- ,
, .
• •,
■.
s .
• '
—,—.., -.., — •.• 4 , ,,,., , , ..— .• ., ,
■
.■
I
; ., ■
. ,
.......
.
V
-1 ,
s .
.
.
'q .
I .
.,
' .
r CITY OF TI4,ARO--12420 S.W.MAIN--TIGARO,OREGON 97223 '
RECEIPT ,
• A ,—ceto
t
DATE /1"--4 7— ,7-:- AMOUNT:$ 04-",
. .
. ,
'""--- I i v. **7.7 O. ' 41 ----- --DOLLARS
, '4, --- -1',_ ,,,-
i'•
•
NAME ■,_ 4,....,er .., 1, , Ard .....i
".. -..'* CASH: 1' .,...c.
'3.
__,, ,
ADDRESS', 7.3-4- Jr '../ , alci ' .‘,2- .
P 9 5.41/1 Ms0,:
0 OF
,
FOR ACCT. # PERMITS SURCHARGE AMOUNT I.
,
.
SEWER BILLINGS 40-364 $
•,,',
,
., BUSINESS LICENSE 05-331
i
.. PLUMBING PERMIT 05-332 _ _ $ [,..
,
MECHANICAL PERMIT 05-3f2 ._ _— .
,
. ,.,
BUILDING PERMIT 05-333 -
1,...
SEWED CONNECTION 40-363
SEWER INSPECTION 40-365
.
,• SYSTEM DEV,CHARGE 25-366
..
.,''.,.
,
, PARK DEV.CHARGE#1 30-367 , •PARK DCV,CHARGE#2 30-368
i..,
, .
• ZONING ADJUSTMENTS 05-362
1 '
,„ ,t,•25; e....e, .
• 4 TOTALS $,.............,____4,,...__„...1/42,_
,
RECEIVED BY: .,efril ,
PERMIT NUMBERS ASSIGNED:
itUrnber ,- ,Amount b
NUmer Amount Number AmoUnt
. i
•
...,
IZECEIPt#15 5 2 .,
. t
...
••■nim••■••••=....m•
( •
•
d • re,t,
(S.5 5 )
SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION caV TIGARD Date 19...t2
No
The applicant hereby applies for a permit for the work indicated or as shown in the accompanying plans and
specifications.
SIGN LOCATION ADDRESS:
•'
APPLICANT: Owner Lessee Authorized Representative
NAME/COMPANY Tel.
PROPOSED SIGN: Freestanding X Wall Projecting _Other
SIGN DIMENSIONS AREA 7.Z HEIGHT 26 WALL AREA
PROPERTY FRONTAGE 212 COST.....11Zel_fL ZONING DISTRICT .-ILLUMINATION
MATERIAL -- COLOR
COPY
EXISTING SIGNS: Freestanding -- Wall Projecting Other
COMMENTS: :of 44 I
All sign permits must be accompanied by a scale drawing and plot
plan. If work authorized under a sign permit has not been completed
within ninety days after the issuance of the permit,the permit shall
PLANNING DEPARTMENT become null and void.
Permit Fee d p
Approved
nt's Signal re
44/ 5
Renewal Date Address Telephone
-;1/41cr, 26 '7141
We are requesting permission to raise the 6' x 12° sign 8-10' higher.
The rirst Interstate Bank building is behind another building which blocks
them from being seem from Pacific Highway.
i h\
0 T )121
CiiY 'GARD
PLANNING DEPT
, -.
, -
iw's .............•..... ., .
. . .
. .
. .
,,•'.,iKi,,,ii
, .
. . ,.
.•, .
• •
. . .
. ,
, .
• • .•
,..
,
., .
, .
...
. .
. , ..
. . . . . , ..
• • -
,: ... ,. • ,
r
. ,,,..., .
•• ,
, •
. • . . ..„
, .
„,,.. . . ,
•
,
• .
.. .
• ‘. , - . .
. ,
. .
•
• II-0 ..•
•
, .
,,: • .
,....
,,......
•.„,,..
.•..,..
......•.•
•,,,
,., •‘.0,
. -.-
t m`••-.
1
,-..•....
•.,..
..
...•..,,.4...',.,.....,,,.,.,,•
',.........
..
.,.
,,'..•....,..,
.
•.,•
...,...,...••.,..,,
•.:,"...."‘',.„
•„,,....,..••.•,•..,..
First
..•-..''.•...,.,,.•,.-...,,....•,..,,-..'.:.*:..
\ . er
s...•",':‘.,.,,,:•'•,•,
.•.::..„,,,•..,..., „•.,- ••e
•".,:-,;,...,•.,.
.,.,„4.,..,•
..i.
,'•,
,--./.,.,••
-,• . ”,
...........
.•.
,
....
•
.,
......
.,
.,•.
,
. .
• ,
. .
.. , . .
1.4 . .
,
,
•,..
•
I ■ . . .1
I ■
. ,.
. .
. ,
■
. .
■
. ■ . .
• . •
/ •
. '4.•
. , I
.,
X1. 7-, . 'iuc p
. •
. ..,....':,-., ..
i''1'i 130010
, .
6 , .. .•
.
, .
tell ,.• , .
.
•
•
. rVii
LLUM
, ti,.kt , ,o0 ‘ei'.0” •g I '2. ...0'' .
ALL CON' 2 r?c) Pr 2418 e'Rouilj ' I'Lh5” ' esV4P ' . .
eA0 v0 Wii 'It 7Lk$, ,
., . Le)&e:,
,•
• , CiAt 3 0 c.,7 OAT, Pri isPi.Dulk) To f,A1C1-1
..„
14.,Olt
: r:74M 100t-ri-lit4 O'f' 0610 Mk
.„
.. . . ..
•
•
., t
. .
cp ,
. ,
,
,
,
,c,,)
.
,
. . a .
i..,
„ • - .. ..
•
. . ®r Bank
.,_
btt44 No„ , ,
,
fbiS dd§kjh i6 Old 6øe OtOOMY of iltontay 80§,frit r)t a 0 " thi10. 2:71:.,..84 scalele,qi
atid ally dublidalidti iii Ift bnlittity+X.it pt 01 41 taititUtlikiii tii4latitItikkgq itipidtthiOilOtaMAkL tlidtifledtieih§, '_ —,.,“ , ---, -,,",..,, t,
r) i ONtiiiibiled Urikts6 autbotittid'by bWher flAMtAY $10N8,WIC
l21
N..
•
(ityto.6,57VrtA4Z41.- (}i kW S. cA "A"- -c-
C.-CA t C-e-A"- ■-t-SA, 1.-Vr\--e--C-S+,th-e rB c"LAA-- 1 .
: +‘--:avvt, '`S CO "Fcc-C.t--cl C-- 41-i.71 trt. 1.4.3-4‘LA .
, .e,:::---3.,-N-' '\:--- \\"..1,- I , \\\:=
\H‘'s '
r \ \,..:\., _ -4- .
- V----‘ ,---\\
P R. 4'
i -\f-- /`._ '17 \ r J\ . \...,
. y''').-`-, ( -. - -.\ \\_ , ' s. .
209. 8 -
St?t � � -. -� ,P 215. •
i
PAR: K N: G" A:R= Q: 1 j/_ / �.: _ -
,-,, Ile ...........= _.; .., . ., ......,_„. ,_.
• !rte 0 S
.. . , . , i :,...., __0, -
*-**�� i
L c..__
/ -� ",
e If
, 0 ,. / //, - .. ----,-.--:. ..------- .,.,...r---.......:,. -. .
,-- ><- Nta.. -J., ' . .: \''
.-: /// /. / ,7,7--/__\"-.. ._.. __—...,a,—...:, , - ` 210 . —... 1 .,. /i ;1,. , .
�i ,,, ,r % is � — _��__. __ .__ ' ) ,.-: .:: k yl nt. _...., ,lit,. ,,, ii , pi„ /100, ,,y,/
f�,r ! ØIfu .fr � I . P LED !I 17
,,�, ff „ --P'A R K I-N G \`
c.....,./......A
010 oAVED d ,n I ' PARKING 4 1� `:\.
i\,'-1 \II\ 1 \\ I /."I 11
,4.- ', ojcii, \I st,. ;• \\\ . . .
. i \ - I. - ..- :•!-. --.......,:'
. — No '1.c,, -•.. -. •
,� , o c k r\
` . 1":4 i 00 \ . , \\ Nc.r. -
i.
5,
...-._....�.....-.«.»__,,,,......„•ate,.,,...,,.... ,
XPL.«-..., a..,..*,.,.............,. w-.....a,,.....-,_.m+.r,-...x....w,..- w...,.,........_m...._,Y,.,........-.•.-.erv.a.:11RCLlMt,e,....x...-.. _
rt y M Y .Y 4' .+f 11
The following will be considered Bred by the `riga tt'Manning Commission on
`� at ..
November 15, 1983 at 7;30 p.m.at Fowler Jr, High School lecture room, 10865 z
S.W.Walnut,Tigard,OR Further information may be obtained from the Direc- a; ° '.
tor of Planning&Development at 12755 SYW.Ash,Tigard,Oregon or by calling < 0
639.4171, Y-. ti)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 17-83 Marvin Smith NPO#6 ••
Zone Change ZC 13.83
• • A request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from low to medium j,'.'
density residential and a Zone Change from R-7PD to A-12 to facilitate a 174'
unit condominum complex on approximately 8,5 acres.The property is desig-
nated Low Density and zoned R-7PD. Located: Between Cook PEit and Tigard
High School off SW 92nd Ave.,Wash.Co.Tax Map 2S1 14A,Lot 1 000,.
' Subdivision S 9-83 Bond Park#2 NPO#5
A request for a Preliminary Plat approval for a 24 lot single-family residen
tlal subdivision on 3.75 acres.The property is designated Medium Density and'
is zoned A-12. Located: on SW 79th Ave. off Durham, Wash.Co. Tax Map 2S1
' 12C,Lot 2300. ,!
Sign Code Exception SCE 3-83 Wayside Inn NPO#4
, A request for an exception from the sign code to allow the placing Of an
additional,free-standing sign, 100 square feet per face and 30 feet in height,to
identify the Wayside Motel The property is designated General Commercial 1
and is zoned C-5.Located„atulI460 SW Pacific Hwy.
Sign Code Exception SCE"4.83First Interstate Bank NPO#2
A request for an exception"from the sign code to allow raising the height of i
an existing 26 foot high sign by eight or ten feet. The property is designated i
General Commercial and is zoned C-5.Located at 11760 SW Hall, '
Subdivision S8.83 PD Century 21 Homes Inc,NPO#3 .
A request for a Conceptual and Detailed Plan approval of a Planned Devel- .
. opment, consisting of 215 single family units. The property is designated Low i
Density Residential and zoned R-7 PD,; Located at 13900 SW 121st Ave., Wash, i
i. Co.Tax Map 2S1 3CC,Lot 401 and 2S1 4,Lot 1400.
TT6259 Publish November 3, 1983
i
i
E .
1
i.
9
. i
1.
I
i
i((
. • ,
i
y
1,
H'
I
t
f
•
I
.
Y 1
1
■
l
tt
{
1
Y R
1
t
•
•
;;, rte"'
n m
e
•
b,,...„,a,
s
bFr.
D �,
;
•
.Y,,,
' i roe, - 1-..,,"'q.
K.e. ': :�- 4.a,,r. " r, s �, k� � n r •� �:-:�� pr�'� �
3•-W I! ..^ , P 4P R'+`u�.. 4.I`5� rW`M..:.J>'
I , r t• '` .�e �� ) r~to r...0.,:„,µ,.4;t,,, ; :).'k,,,. x' ' r, , , ,.....
. \.,, ((...(75.( t, ■''' „.-.1, i
, .
, .,,, __,
', 1
<' d ,.•
a 4,-""'* Y r
i
„pe, 5j� :..wl" m „A "C°" 1 '.,A,- �,r'mta E.rvy "ti
r.'hL a It a;a ' a _^ ��'1 's 4 °,' ".ue,;,yA k.siw»^r'" 4 t lx;..:rz
a'... " n ,,...:,b.•. ".'' , y'=hra3 fir" .. .
Y 4 ,,9y y e
. . k„ .kP dim' � ,�•
. r''''''''-= / ...
.• •i
0
, 1
F
i
•
1••
•
A
y
r
y
,,.... V .. .�,, ...,• ,��., .a,,.,, .� ,..n.,,n+N.,w,.,.,a,-r.., .�.w.,.�.�« [ «�.er «.•...,..rw.-e. t'. •, ,.. •
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]