Loading...
SCE2-84 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. •. - ■•■• .• TEXACO, INC. SCE 2-84 .•: — 11834 SW Pacific Hwy. 2S1 1BB lot 3tat .", •• • / •- • r • I .• • • ,.• • ft •. t , a J Jt J:7'17 r' . { ` MEMORANDUM • CITY OF TIGARD TO: File of SCE 2-84 PROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Planning and Development 0/.47 ---- ,: • .. �;; DATE: October 4, 1984 SUBJECT: SCE 2-84, Approved Modification The attached memo from Richard Webb, representing Texaco, has been accepted. The modification meets the intent of the sign code exception granted by the Commission. Proposed modifications do not exceed the size limitations approved by the' Commission and the locations are regarded as a better solution. : • r ' . • (0691P) ' y %,d r • F r • • ■ i • • A t .,` .0?-0? , . / '1(v _.„ . ..,,, f , RICHARD L. WEBB ARCHITECT . . 10320 13.W. WASH. OM/PORTLAND, OREGON 27226 , ii (a03) 292-9432 Sept. 30 , 1984 .6 112 Si n A royal Re uest a* exaco ervice en er , 11835 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon i City of Tigard i • 127.55 S.W. Ash . Tigard, Oregon 97223 , Attn: Mr. Bill Monahan emeummemorsts. 01101MINVVIVOIMMIXVIIMPOARCUMINSMONNUMINGNeno Dear Bill: i 1 J As per our phone conversation last Friday, Sept. 28th, this letter and the following data is submitted to , clarify the verbal explaination of the sign revisions 1 c, at the Texaco Service Center located at 11835 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, Oregon, Your tentative approval was i . . greatly appreciated and I sincerely believe the proposed . revitions reflect a mutual agreement that protects the intent and inTereSts of both the Oily of Tigard and property owner (TeXaco) as well. Your review and - written rebponse to the proposed revisions will be appreciated as soon as possible. . The following signs and their respective comments are listed for reference and clairification. Please review . the attached Site Plan and reOpective sign draWings for , , exact locations and sign design Types: f . ( 1) azetra.2_91-122ItiLW1liga! (Originally submitted and approved - Sign Exception SCE 2-84, dated 6/22/84. ) il i 11. The Freeway Orientated Sign s resubmitted to be installed at a new location in the S corner of the Site, The sign design will be as originally sUbmitted . and approved - 48 N . height, 170 sd . ft for each ,..‘ sign face, and orientated to kighWay #217. The new location Will be in a planter-type area at the sate approximate grade aS the orlginal submittal. The existihg "TEXACO° Preeway-Orientated sign Will be removed in its entirety prior to erection of the • new Preeway orientated sign. ,„.• I ,.. • ; 1'1:1 Ae page 2. hr (2) Free-Standin PriceLatntLtL_aigaL (Originally su mitte an approVa-.7- SCE 2-84, dated 6/22/84. ) -Sigri-EYEEption The corner located Free-Standing Price/Identity Sign will NOT be installed. The existing Free- Standing sign will be removed in its entirety and the existing planter will remain in its present state. A new Free-Standing Reader-Board type sign is proposed in lieu of the original approved sign. (See Item #3) . (3) New Free Standingjaader-Board and Information : -717 new enclosed Drawiriis7T This sign will replace the original approved Free- Standing sign and be located in the existing planter where the present Freeway Orientated sign is located. The new sign will be a two-pole type design with a 8 '-0" x 6 '-0" Price Identification Sign-board and a 8' -0" x 2' -0" Information Sign ( "Diesel") above. The 64 sq. ft. area per side (128 sf total) is far less than the original approved area of 75 sq. ft. area per side WO sf total) . The sign will be installed above the 8 ft. "visual height clearance" and below the code allowed 20 ft. maximum height limitation. 0 00 (4) Existin Price Si n: (Located in the "front" planter with the existing reeway-Orientated Sign. ) A request to retain this sign until the new Free- Standing Reader-Board/Information Sign arrives is hereby submitted for approve' by the City of Tigard. It is imperative that fuel prices be advertised to . maintain a competative business, while awaiting the arrival of the new sign. Removal of the existing sign of 0 . ,Tn S entirety will commence immediately Upon the arrival and installation of the new Price/Information Sign (six Week "order-delivery" time is estimated by Texaco, Inc. ) . ( 5) New Oano Si nS: (SUbmitted With the dahopy & Face-Lift -. A Drawings to the ity of Tigard on 8/444 - Signs Were NOT approved for a Permit, pending the outcome of the Free-Standing Sign issue . ) The 28" high Single letter "TEXACO" signs ( total) and related "Star-Logos" (3-total) Will be installed on the canopy at locations noted on the site plan and as shown on the original drawing d submitted on V21/844 The face-mounted signs are Within the standardS of the • governing Tigard Sigri Ordinance that aliow 15 of the wail Surface to be signed. , SY, 6y' Page 3. � .j, f ( 6) "Other" Signs on the Premise : ` To meet the requirements of the approved Sign Exception . ' SCE 2-84, dated 6/22/84, an on-site meeting was held with Keith Lyden of the City of Tigard in regards to what signs were or were not in conformance to the j City's Sign Code. Only the Free-Standing Price Sign in the front of the property was found as "non-conforming" as to the intent of the Code and must be removed prior to commencing sign construction. All other signs were accepted on behalf of the City as "informative and/or state-required" . Any new s_ ,ins or signs not included in this proposal MUST be in conformance with the City Sign Code and MUST submitted to the City for approval prior to installation , • I of such said signs. In summary f the Texaco sign ' xp • y gn issue, I would like to Tess my appreciation on behalf of myself Richard L. Webb, Architect, o the and Inc. , Ti Planning and the Owners, Texaco, g Planning and , Building Department (Bill Monahan, Keith Lyden and Ed Waldron) for their assistance and cooperation eration in resolving a "long- drawn-out" si g na e situation. Their cooperation ,. on the Texaco project reflects an intent desire to uphold the written Zoning & Sign Ordinances and requirements of the City while demonstrating consideration in regards to requests and demands • of the Owner and/or business in question. a spoksman soluta s oksman for • w ee�. ,o • and between the As an Architect an or Inc. ,Ync. we f • that the n reached City and the Owner per se, will be an improvement to both the Texaco site and the surrounding community. Texaco is looking forward to your final approvals and proceeding to do their part of upgrading and improving the Texaco Service Center site in question. Z 0 u have any questions in regards to the written documentary , and/or r he various . • submitted; lease drawings that have been or are being p let me know. , Sincerely V'114111?en, Richard L, Webb, Architect PORTLAND, OqGON 14,OF u • .. - ., .,<a..>,,.MUWn.wa. v w, , e.ra arw*i+ww. -.•. . . , • . . . , . .. , _ . _. .., ... .. . * . . k i #4. . • ' • '1.,.: • : . I 0 1 1 II t , . . . qtri 4 I ,___ I ilD 11 Gcl 0 en . ,. . up . . .. ,,, • . I I) • Ir." • I . . .. . . . . • v. • I . , '..:.••.•,:• "..' , • • , . • . SW COMO 011001 , .. I,. i 1 , . . , H , .. e qi aded rrL . , ': ' Um it*. ... . % ...i Ow,looms . a . 4 , 0 'I.. : \1 .• .'e. .' ., , •04 .:. ..: . le I 11111111 , .. ,••;.,..-.:.;....-,...... - :•..- ' . .,,,..„ • . • . . , . , tim • , . ' ',.r. .' n a.. .. ' -'. .. ,... . 6 . , • , j ,..7 • I . mil. ' ITEM NO'S. 408-MB 8 MB 3 • . . -----"jk—1' . ., ..,„ 01-23.40" . • lif 01' .01 • . SIGN ELEVATION 4‘ . SCALE'li2 . . , f 0 X • ': GROUT AS Nreo tosiofft vi__ , ... 0 , , , SASE otArE, .. .,„ ...........se.... 2 . • , , • • .., IOM. ilifiCkatiOLTS I" . 4 Q110 ,, .... moot TO or cooscavere,"\ [ i - '..1 •ci ' . "";--- . , , . . • . • - ....i..,',.,-,t-,-t,,,,...44:., ;... . .....--:1; .--,...... . . , • • , i ii 11 il 1 : I; 1 1 i I coosateTE rotimmTiON i el i %,!.. X . ."1 1 ariokbovt groat stiLooto - i . . es ro mat PLAT!, • = i I 1 1 i i i *---4...,„.. • i 1 coimie . , .,' 1 ii 1 1 1 coiaterer MALL ogitrAiol 1 ai 41"1144471:it‹,1 is II liti 4"---,1 Ogiortectutevir' 'ratio TS I 1 TORO iig ,t, 1 i i I 1 or Mao 0 1 i 11 II , or some row IN INO Mrs, I , 7.....4;.. 0 4.,L011016.1 ' ""`"tr""•"•1.‘""•"*""1 111011110110 notextrrot ea LOtha 4,......: ........... wear 6....0 144 —IT . I 'IT ,1, 1 Z,ArrAlrely "IINNI I Iti.:'.151111■101111741 "As al ram . , .• k • ' ' . . . . . . .. - . . ... • . . . . . . . . . ' .. • . ., . . l )I T t -.1 .1 An d....d .., . -ST'PT 0 N.) V t.3 ? ,21/?? 4 to°0 T9 °P. Aizo.z.,-. Tos)Avo Oto ,IA . . 1 5 0 1-1 4 1 0 4 4/1 S%C O OS I I ovte.A.Ter) 1-OAT 'T146 litLicilt,t,v- lboic49...40 '5■6 0 1)117>Kh 60 u.,)coleArA to i-r 4 eXtrzie... A Om, 1 vcATeT) -riAPcT -11.1e.. ... ,, . . . , • ... , St 60 d-t)04.41> OC$T 'ter, Ali'AdAer) -T FP-446JAN) z‘c...criNs-rat) l• AT 7 CL He-4. AoPlztA1 ws■6 tk.) t-tia e,,,paiit)61,3 A44/ I p 4 > 04 1 oTcp,....564T ie.Ns L e...004.v. ploott) To AP.) A L:rd:R.okra I.-0 A-cm 1..) SOT 071...1adiz., 4.,14itiot, 5 • , . e.‘,.... Avec.(-no 1,3A t... Cataz—5TA loystO 6 Ske.2)JS JUL 4g6Cat...)ve4 4R,e,..4 Aippg.uAL l ' . ., , . , t , TgxAco TED PLUMMEii . # . 1 , { 1 i . MAnkeriNd hkOhd§kNtAtiVe Jack,KW,dT.HELEN O iidAti i tEXAco U.s.A. libiiTLAND,bil 6111b A blVisloN 0 tft)(Acci ItIc, Itit 22tJ,3 /b ). . a I t , ■ , • ,t ( CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION - BY PLANNING COMMISSION 1. Concerning, Case Number(s): SCE 2-84 2. Name of Owner: Texaco Inc. 3. Name of Applicant: Richard L. Webb Address 10320 SW Washington St. City Portland State OrZip 97223_ 4. Location of Property: Address 11 835 SW Pacific Highway Legal Description 2S1 1BB lot 301 5• Nature of Application: Sign Code Exception to allow the replacement of two freestanding signs WHI-61 exceed maximum eig t and area stnadaris w ere - only one is per 6. Action: Approval as requested -77,7 Approval with conditions per Planning Commission Minutes Denial 7. Notice,: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant & owners xx Owners of record within the required distance L. The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization xx Affected governmental agencies • 8. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON June 22, 1984 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of condition can be , 0 obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, • P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 9. Appeal Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.3/0 which provides that a written appeal • may be filed within 10 days after notice is giVen and sent. ' The deadline for filing of afi appeal is "fle 22' 1984 10. Ruestionst If you have any questions, pleaae call the City of Tigard Planning Department, 639,4171, Preidefiti Tigard Planning Commitaion DATE APPROVED . (:: TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - JUNE 5, 1984 1. President Moen called the meeting to order at 7:40 PM. The meeting was held at Fowler Junior High School - LGI Room - 10865 SW Walnut, Tigard, Oregon. 2. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: President Moen; Commissioners Fyre, Butler, Peterson, Owens, & Vanderwood. ABSENT: Commissioner Leverett. STAFF: Director of Planning & Development William A. Monahan, Associate Planner Keith Liden, Secretary Diane M. Jelderks. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM MAY 8, 1984 President Moen noted that the Commissioner's name was left off the motion at the bottom of page 6. Owens moved for approval of minutes with addition of the Commissioner who made the motion. Peterson seconded. 1`l Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. if 4 4, PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION o President Moen read letters of resignation from Phil Edin and Frank Tepedino. o Vice President Owens commented she had been contacted by church members in her neighborhood regarding the 135th LID. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 SUBDIVISIONS 6-84 CECIL BOONE PARK Associate Planner Liden made staff's recommendation to set this iteM over to a date certain: Discussion followed: Owens Commissioner Owens Move' to set over to August 8, 1984. Commissioner ryre moved seconded. Motion carried unanimously b Commissioners re...., ... unanimously y present. freestanding signs 5.2 SIGN CODE EXCEPTION SCE 2=84 g '" and ,. . . . wo. • . „ ,, � ... g ins Which exceed Maximum To allow the replacement of t height. ..,,. area standards where only one is per itte2S1 1BB Ta and ar LOCATION; 11834 SW Pacific Hwy: (Wash Map , x Lot 801) Associate Planner Liden made staffs recommendation for approval of Sign r' Code Exception SCE 2-84 with conditions PLANNING COME118810N dune � g, 1984 Page 1 y " ( . . NPO-CCI - No one appeared to speak. Applicant's Presentation - Richard Webb, Architect, 10320 SW Washington Street, explained how Texaco was cleaning up their signage nationwide. Agreed to drop first free standing sign to 22 feet. Also he had made a f calculation error and total face should have been 148.8 instead of the 164. He expressed his concern for staff's request to drop second sign to 35 foot height because of visual clearance and requested the Commission to allow the increased height. Discussion followed. PUBLIC TESTIMONY -- No one appeared to speak. CROSS EXAMINATION AND REBUTTAL. o President Moen questioned if staff had a problem with raising the height. Staff stated they had recommended what the code allowed for an outdoor advertising sign. o Commissioner Owen questioned staff how they had determined that the 35 feet would be adequate. Discussion followed. o PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED : . o Commissioner Pyre supported the appl'icant's request for 40 feet. • o Commissioner Butler saw no reason to oppose as these are standard signs for that Company nationwide. o Commissioner Owens questioned if our sign code is inappropriate for what is being designed. Was concerned whether the extra height would be sufficient. o President Moen questioned the height of the existing sign. Discussion followed with applicant, o Commissioner Peterson supported a sign height of 40-48 feet: Was concerned with second sign but was willing to support. o Commissioner Vandert"oad supported applicant's proposal. o President Moen agreed with Commissioner Butjer regarding the use of standard signs a o Discussion followed regarding the signs on Pacific Highway: ` Peterson moved for approval of Sign. Code E c eption SC o Commissioner E 2-84 sub3ect to the following conditions: ,4 1. The two existing freestanding signs be removed. 2. The freestanding sign at the corner of Pacific Hwy. and, Garden. Place shall be alleged the e5{ce high,tion of 22 feet hi�� ,, 150 total square feet with an 8 foot visual height clearance PLANNINO COMMISSION June 53 1984 Page 2 ' r i rm . ri• 3. A second freestanding sign shall be permitted with an orientation to 217. The maximum height shall be 48 feet and the maximum area shall be 170 square feet for each side for a total of 340 square feet. 4. All other signs on the property shall be removed or brought into conformance with the Code prior to erection of the replacement signs. 5. Building permits shall be obtained from the Building Inspection Office, 6. This approval shall be valid for a period of one year. Commissioner Vanderwood seconded. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. 5. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 9-84 VARIANCE V 9-84 WINTERLAKE ' .r approval of a 160 unit apartment development and a variance to the re.. irement for one covered parking space per unit (CDC 18.06.030). LOCA',ION: Ease side of SW 135th Avenue, 1/2 mile south of Scholls Ferry Road ash. CO. Tax Map 1S1 33DC, Tax Lot 500). Associate lanner Liden made staff's recommendation for approval of SDR 9-84 with c nditions. He explained there are two errors on the staff report. One, the density transition did not apply because the adjoining property to thv east is develop in• not ,• est ablished.blished. Second was the requirements for 100 foot wide density strip �ould be required along the .i southern boundary. \ ngthy discussion followed. John Klein, developer f Morning Hill, commented that Morning Hill had been approved for R-4.5 z ing and never was approved for R-7 zoning. 4 Staff continued that the var' nce request needed to be discussed with the Commissioners before staff cou make a recommendation. Discussion between Commissioners a d staff regarding information submitted and who would approve requested chases and how to proceed with motion, NPO COMMENT: o Richard proposed•. He felt the proposal should that the NPO ad not reviewed plan, • x.c and Bobei° was concerned "� remanded NPO. He then. read and oi�ld be remanded to the submitted letter stating concerns for this pro sal, APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION: P recommendation. They w g the a plicant; took no xception to staffs Ron Johnson re resent�.n t P would like to amend their propos '1 to allow for the 100 foot buffer. He continued how they would like the ariance approval ' p., g. stated .•. y be granted, They also would like to meet with the NPO but Pere concerned nd for the covered parking. He stated reasons why they felt royal should y because of the time frame. They would like conditional apps 'val at this time. RECESS 9:10 P.M. RECONVENE: 9:25 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSION June 5i 1984 Pa e -,----._ • .. Tom._._... ,',.. .. ... ..... ... ..... ........... .„... .,,.,- .... ....._,..,, ....,-..... ....,..,.,..,«+.,...,,.... ....,........,...«,«.....«....,..._...-....-_.,..,r.....,„.,., ........ • STAFF REPORT ' AGENDA ITEM 5A, . JUNE 5, 1984 - 7:30 P.M. ±' TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION { ' FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL - LGI ROOM ' 10865 S.W. WALNUT TIGARD, OREGON 97223 SS I \k A. FINDING OF FACT ' 1. General Information • CASE: Sign Code Exception SCE 2-84 REQUEST: To allow the replacement of two freestanding signs which l .. exceed maximum height and area standards where only one is permitted. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial General { • ZONING DESIGNATION: CG (Commercial General) "r APPLICANT: Richard L. Webb OWNER: Texaco Inc. 10320 SW Washington St. 3800 NW St. Helens Road Portland, Oregon 97225 Portland, Oregon LOCATION: 11834 SW Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 1BB Tax Lot 301) 2. BackroUnd No previous land use decisions have been made by the City on this property. . 3. Vicinity Information All surrounding properties are zoned C-G (Commercial General). The Pacific Highway °- 217 interchange is immediately east of the subject property. 4. Site, Information and Proposal Description The subject property contains a Texaco Service Station including two freestanding signs. The applicant proposes to replace the signs and freestanding number of smaller signs pon the property. Th g � i remove a t{ signs ndg and their removal is require. signs rare�consit{ered to be non-conforming , egilire by the sign ordinance by 1988. An exception is required because only one freestanding sign isperMitted and the tWo proposed signs Will exceed applicable height and size limits imposed by the Code. Staff Report SUE 2-84 page 1 .j r mmS,•' r,rr 1,'f':+ i .is ,.,e,..+.r+ ur,.s,:.;, - rchnn ....,.. ..,..k ............. ......... a. One freestanding sign will be located near the Pacific Highway - Garden Place intersection with a 10 foot setback from each street. It will have a height of 24 feet and a total sign area (divided equally on two sides) of approximately 164 square feet. The height and size limits in the Code are 21 feet and 140 square feet respectively. :•w,,;,' The second sign w ill be located on the o pp osite end of the property near the Pacific Highway - 217 interchange. This sign will be 40 feet high with a 338 square foot sign area divided equally between two sides. This is considered as a second freestanding sign but it functions • primarily as an outdoor or billboard sign oriented toward 217. j 5. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering. Division and NPO # 5 have no objection to the proposal. The Building Inspector Office is opposed to permitting new signs which exceed Code requirements. Granting exceptions for new signs will make removal o1 non-conforming signs more difficult for the City to enforce. • The State Highway Department has not responded. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION Section 18.114.145 was recently added to the Code to provide the following criteria for evaluating sign code exemption requests, The Planning Commission shall approve, approve with conditions or deny a request for an exception to the sign code based on finding that at least one of the following criteria are satisfied: • A.A 1. The proposed sign code exception is necessary because a conforming building or sign on an adjacent property would limit the view of a sign erected on the site in conformance with the sign code standards. • 2. The proposed exception to the height limits in the sign code is necessary to make the sign visible from the street because of the Al , topography of the site. • 3. There is an access drive which services the business or service ! : froth a street other than the street on which the business is located: 1 • property not appear to limited an visual obstructions by conforming building or signs located proper ties The proposed sign near the Pacific Highway Garden Place intersection Y is intended to exceed both height and area standards. Since the sign, • will be in a clearly visible locations the maximum height of 21 feet and area of 70 sq: ft. (140 total) should be sufficient. The applicant is proposing a 10 foot distance between the bottom of the the sign and the i ground for visual clearance. The City standard is 8 feet. • "r- Staff Report SCE 2834 Page 2 • • The second freestanding sign does appear to need additional size and height because of its relationship with 217. The applicable 20 foot height and 140 square foot area requirements for freestanding signs is ,1 too restrictive for the sign to be of any value for attracting customers from 217. The largest size standards apply to outdoor advertizing signs which may be a maximum of 35 feet high with an area of 675 square feet. After viewing the property and the proposed sign location, it appears that a reduction in height from 40 to 35 feet will still provide for adequate visibility from 217. It, is recognized that the two replacement signs represent a significant ' ' . improvement over the present situation. However, exceptions only to allow two signs and a 35 foot height and increased area for the freeway-oriented sign appear to be justified. All other requirements of the Code should apply. C. RECOMMENDATION • The Planning staff recommends approval of Sign Code Exception SCE 2-84 subject to the following conditions: Jo. 1. The two existing freestanding signs be removed. 1 . 2. The freestanding sign at the corner of Pacific Hwy. and Garden Place shall conform with all Code requirements. 3. A second freestanding sign shall be permitted with an orientation to 217. The maximum height shall be 35 feet and the maximum area shall be 170 square feet for each side for a total of 340 square feet. 4. All other signs on the property shall be removed or brought into conformance with the Code prior to erection of the replacement signs. 5. Building permits shall be obtained from the Building Inspection 6 . Office. • 6. This approval shall be valid for a peri,d 01 one year. /0/ . r • PREPARE) BY, Keit .den LAI'PROVED B• ! �liatt A. Monah 4:,.an Associate Planner Director of Planning Si Development (dmj0459P)) Staff [deport SCS 2-84 :Page 3 • • • / Y.. • RICHARD Le fib! EBB ARCH ITECT 10 320 S.W. WASH. ST./ PGPTLAND,,QAEG©N 97225 . (503) 292.-943 April 17, 1984 Re: u''Sig ep n Exction Re nest" r.om at Texaco Service Center Pacific Hwy We & SW Garden Planning Department Tigard, Oregon #8402--A City of Tigard P.O . Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Sirs On behalf of Texaco, Inc. , I am submitting the required documents and drawings for your Design Review and Sign Exception Approvals that are required prior to issuance of Sign Permits. Asa Consultant for Texaco, Inc. , I , Richard L. Webb, Architect, have been retained to pursue the required approvals and sign permits necessary to implement Texaco ' s area;wide sign replacement program. The• � Texaco sign nreques t has been introduced to s taff members r s iheludin g Ed Wald e n of the Building Dp a and Bill • Monahan, Planning Director, at inforalmeetin s to obtain comments, re strictions, r e qui ze m e nts and directions related to the proposal . A request to hold our submission until the May meeting was acknowledged to allow the City of Tigard time to 'review and implement the "Approval Criteria for Exce p tions to the Sign Code" that were introduced and acted upon at the April 3 , Planning Commission Meeting. It was oUr understanding that specific items were in ues Tenath S directly effected the review and out question r u re in on ha• c Sign Request. Thus, oUr sign pro osal re vest is hereby �oC �L p Umented f as folows with a comment from Texaco , Inc. , that the best interests of all parties concerned mute in the proposed sign replacement request is sub � p , to Upgrade the � e situatio existing out-dated signagwithin the the Texaco Service Center identity " y Tigard Cornrnunity . ` sign. T eplacemen intent As previously stated) the Sign Drawings refle ct a new area-wide attempt by Texaco , cr , update and i modernize their existing Service Center facilities by iMplerrientin an overall "well-planned" sigh prOgram, AS drawin S, si gnage i S included as part of the etotalodesign co icept in lieu o the .• ... , g ' ... i' g p , n '� e Stin planned", disoranited array of sighs hthat iexist at the present Service Center. Colors used for both the building a n • d signage prbgrams reflect design continuity and good color coordination by using contrastitng colors of similar it ., Code Compatability: The proposed Sign Replacement Request deviates from the Tigard Sign Ordinance on various technical requirements but meets the basic intent of the Ordinance by proposing signage that has visual appeal and overall design quality that best serves the interests of the Community and the property Owner. As shown on the drawings, two specific signs are included with this proposal and each is explained as follows: A. Free Standing,identifica-t,ion ancL Price Sign.: Located at the northwest corner of the site , the existing sign is proposed to be replaced with a new 24-ft. high double-pole , two sided, sign that incorporates the Texaco logo and name , diesel service identification, and fuel price signage that presently exists at three locations on the site, • The increased height req uest is essen tial t o ma intain the 10-ft. minimum corner height restriction and integrate the sign into one "all-purpose" identification, price informative free standing sign: The proposed free standing sign also exceeds the area limitations by 12 sf each face and consideration is requested in the form of a "Sign Exception" on both <' "deviations" based on A;i ticle 18. x.14-. 14O-A of the existing Tigard Sign Ordinance . As a matter of record, the new sign proposal replaces the existing revolving Texaco�� sign with attached price and product identification signage that totals t ° In addition to this, signage at the end of the site (approx.g... g � opposite Pr 75 sf) will be eliminated. $. 'ree .8tanding Itighway Orientated„sign. This "logo-only" sign is proposed to replace the existihg ft. high single letter "Texaco" Sign and other attached signs) located on the northeast side of the site and adjacent to the freeway (Hwy. #217) . na uionw� ` of the. new proposal Is to conform to the r�he�� ritentde industry standar " ` y d Of identification by nationally recognized logos only at freeway orientated sign locations. Although the existing sign may legally remain as a "granfather" type of exception to the Tigard Sign Ordinance , Texaco feels it is in the best interests of the Community to replace the existing sign with the proposed new design that will enhance the surrounding, area. • n ' ' r., sj Consideration is requested to allow the second free- standing sign and accept the reason for it' s existance as a "Freeway Orientated Sign" . Up until the new Sign Ordinance was adopted, such signs adjacent to freeway rights of way were allowed and acknowledged by the City of Tigard as such. Again it is Texaco ' s intent to upgrade the existing Service Center' s identity within the Community by investing in a major Sign replacement project that is in the best interests of all parties concerned. Proposed Signage Details Both free standing signs are shown in detail on the enclosed drawings and are assumed to be "self-explanatory" . A brief description of each sign is noted for reference • as needed: A. Free Standing Identification & Price Sign: A 24-ft. high, illuminated, double-pole , two-sided • sign structure with the following signage is proposed: 1 . A 6-ft. x 7-ft. Texaco logo with the word "Texaco" below in ten inch high letters. The "Star-logo" is white on a red background surrounded by the • black border aS shown. The word "Texaco" located below the logo is in red lettering. 2. The V -6° x 6' -0" "Diesel" Sign is dark grey with white 9" capital and '7" lower case lettering. • 3. The 4e -6" x 6' -0" price reader board is a white background With black lettering for the product and related price numbers . 4. Pole supports for the sign are 8" x 8" steel tubes painted black and attached to structurally designed concrete footings. 5. The sign is to be installed in the same location as the existing sign, surrounded by a protective island planter, B. ?toe StanA.ing_112..JL2.29/2..212eLA2Jap A . A 40-ft. high illUminated, doUble-pole , two- Sided Sign structure With the following signage i8 propoSedi ii A 13 ' x 13 ' Texaco "Star-logo" sign pnlm. The word "Texaco" is not proposed with this sign. • 2. Poles are to be approximately 12-inch diameters painted black pipe columns attached to structurally designed concrete footings. , • i . n , , 3. The sign is to be installed in the same location as the existing sign, surrounded by a protective island planter. Orientation to the freeway traffic will be similar to existing. 4. Note that the new sign will be 19-ft. less in height than what now exists and 60 sq. ft. less each face in sign area. Summary: In summary, the City of Tigard' s consideration in regards a "Sign Exception" approval is requested to improve a sign situation that now exists at the existing Texaco Service Center. The Request is based on the following facts: A, The best interests of the Community and property Owner will be better served by approving the request as submitted. The sign replacement proposal will be an improvement and upgrading to both the Community and surrounding neighborhood. B. A general ''clean--up" of signage will be evident at the Texaco Servic e Center by allowing. an integrated free-standing identification/price information sign at the northwest corner as ro. osed. pp of the Freeway Orientated Sign replacement ace and O . Approval lacement eliminate existing Sign area by 60 sq. ft. per �' will reduce the Si ar r ' g gns that will be consolidated into a single price information sign at the northwest • corner of the site. D. The aesthetic quality of the proposed free-standing signs will be cofipatable with and enhance the surrounding area, there are any questio ` � regards to the proposal in If ns in g they are looking g Also�aonobehalfaofaTexacoraInc� s` please let m�nknforward your "Sign gn Exception consideration x doin • their part of improving Exception" and. g . po our i p g the aesthetic qualities of the dity of Tigard. Sincerely; Richard L. Webb, Architect for Texaco ! Inc. i' ..... F. _ _... .n....w.M.... .. , <.. .. r. _ •:P.-! ...O1 ..Y•:w.l,":,1'...•.atS,aV'r„Y'w' aA.J1.11Lka,: - - . . . . . . . . a . .,- . . --' 1 i 1 -... 1 -- , .... ...• . -‹ (9 ... Iis'I. 0 -- 1 c'a 0 .'- 5 .- 4- i ,.„Fi '7' •••• :- . ____ ... SEE MAP .- P6° -4 ,‘ .... ,-s.„, , ts , 36c c . f _ --- -MEM 1.5'4411-44444 1114 , tkikHi 01 - — iiiii". it. k ----, , :- — efif.,...- •., \ ,, ....l lsfrift -17:59. 1' - -f-- .4 „- Off"" . ..4;., , -_-. -. C\ ...; 71,111' 61- .0 ‘ • ....... 1 .:/1104'- -7.... 1 .1s... .,= ...//,;. \% .8 t •-: ti : T„ cr;%/44:i1"'' ... Ei,.... :- 00 ZS. 'gl ailar 0 78 4 C (t.'\, i z - , . • 4:s`• i 4 0 1 ,.... ' .o• _,- ., o=. - , X ......., ; ._^` . •,_ «. c«V A \\:_ \‘..37\ \ r r ...,- . 0.... \ fr _is so._ .-- ....„_:, . -?:...... i - ..........._._. _ L 5 1 _ ........all•INIO, * '..7.1s- 1 ‘.*-'-- 1 \\ ......:-.Z.N. ..0 . ...: II ...„. ,,.. •, ,• ..., t __ ___ ..,..,. ,. - 4 \- ,3 • \ ‘ -....,..... _ V \\ \ 0 . , -Cr,'''' 0 i •:-;==. t ti.1 P.,. .....",. v= * : I > rECTIOt4 CORNER ta —,› c'rt.-i- Xv. ,„„Z. „. , • r. ir 35 -o .. \- li ? V \ ._ .. , r .........s.v■yptireaser.■.- . . 1 . ---." -.."■:. 1 .. . ' .- -... --1 r t 7 a!:A-..‘s..—--et:•■•••■••■•••• •!7 '''''''A............ ........... 1 t 1, I t f - ? . _ .-_ • . • • • • ' . . • • • • • • • 1 I , t-fo% •...•.„ • • . •. . • • r 4 1. •• • • • • • • . • • • • a91-t° .9 TEXACO ' StteitiiCe, - Plopubw L001)•• • , • • "1.4.4 t 0 0 It • •• Now Cethrlivej • i•A . SOF/4f Uftioa<liki • • . • • Itt • tik .4.4.4444 • • • it) I it „ .„.• „ • „ „4. .„ 46t, , •. „ trn • i • • 4 •41,-.1•••■144.4 4,14 • • ,., . . .......,..,... , .,. . ( • • %% it-- EyAsrtvIG rp..545...N.N_ tgi o -rtg-s-Tc) ste.....,44 it .,., • . .. . T , . . 04.1$"11 , . ., .a! , , . '1"4:-\ 5:151.A mt SID . '1 .j.... =1._____25.W_IlactatQl‘ . , '' .• ,. .,- 0/ . 7.„,,,,,tr.` - .-,.,,,.- ' .- • , ...ZACcot•I A . , , . t..... . .: le.siot., . ' . . '..• , _ ..... ,.•..,.A ,,,, '•',.,,,,c,.9,'.';',A,7,1it, 1 .' '"',,, •':',....„'"•'t''• ..*::,..‘-'•.... ;' .,`"......t2'.‘'....' .'' : *•,.i. ,., -. •:', :',"•• '..,' '...'•••,. :-.;8'8'4,•74',11*,tiL .,f4.,„,„, ' ,,•:',.N,lt,,,,,17::::'.',,,- ,., ,. 1g , i.,... t.go.:, • 1 . . '', 'f,''.:'''.',''''''.‘ -,'..:, ,; ';„',.' Ie.; . ••','. 'v •• ., ,.. ......—...„..—:.:4«........', . .'.:. ' •,•i, ,' * ' --. '-' •' ., ''.., "„ . . , .,..'.:,..`k..-‘',',.. •'. '' •• , '' '..',: -,; . r, ', 8, : .:. , ., , ,,, , , , ,,• „, , , ...,,, , ..','..',.'41,4';','. ,',,,''',; , ''.'',,• .1 .. ' ', ','•.,•• ' • „r ','. , '4,, '. ' i '' '.•'', '',, ''. ,. ;' ' '''',''i•' .,' .., . . ,k,';',,!,':,, , ''::•:: ''.',4,,,', ',,,a;.g. .`,'' . ,' •,': ...A. •'• ; •,';', ,", ":..„•. •••,.;,..r . -;'' f.^..1 ',. '., ' ..' ':..... ' :' .:''''. .f.;...1,Y,..'..V.I.',..v.,,,.. ...*,'.',... .'■••,,,,,:1. ''''. v.4 f,.1.,„.:. ''',,k:,,,,,' .::,`. .' .'.' ,...,,,, ,• v.,,,. , ,'I.i.' :".!: .' ''',.'„.., . .t,,,,,,'.ow.,•",,,, t.v,„'„N''i?"•,..., ' • .'.;,, ,,,tf,. • ,,:- , ,, .. .. .;,..-.,;,.; .•.,,, .....•., . .* :Zk;lii\iii4C2 5,-t;-4 rzbm-72.--ATe:Ror-j - Ae-01- AC - 0- • . .444.4,.........4 ..q ... .. . . ,. , , XI i\ Cl ,A ,, —% 1 k, • a'.*,.■'' 't 4 4 ..,,,, '1,4..„.„,,' .".'.;,....4Z,..,-,.. ; #1, "4 i at „. .__t.,, .7,!........,.,1,0„... ‘,„ ..,.....;„,..,., .. ..., ifiglii4 `;,' , t ,. ,•movisexel, .■,:.4.,,tv,fr.,,. . . .. lei .f. . .eir ;"'" hor Ai.e",_, 4..,,,,.-,... .,' .,.. . ,,-. ......,..‘:., ..,, .. , .;.,... t... ,.„. ,..„ . ,...,--. t.,6e,•• , ,..6.....-..- ,.1,.,r it ii*, .I,rm.! '0 , .., '• .• ,. -; t • .,' :•:-.......,.. : I,. 1.8, ,,,,,,,t,„,,.L. ,•- It 4.11.1r. . .•— . . , ••• ' A . ,„ .0. • . ,'• .,* ,..—,• '', '., • ....--..-,...,*'— ' '. 1. Alsts '41;•r: . ' • ..‘, •• : ''' '1'-' ' • ' , ' (.',', I.'. . ' . . ' , . . • . . . .. , . . • , . . , . ... (switz, 44 t ,i2 tave.‘as 41141/41, %vok‘ei tart4=5 .1,t)oe. - ttwkAt. vso, ) • ' ,. .. •1111111111•1111•11=111111=1111.11.111=1MMININIMMIIPMERIPSt. . . • .., . , . •• . . . .. . . VS.f. , . ... .. • . . , .. , . . .,,••': . .• „ . . . , . . ,. . I. ,,, ( , . ,. ., .• ,. .• • . . .,.• .. , .. . .,., ., •••. . , ., • ; ,''' • . . ,•,, . , r.• . , . ,,,•. , • . . , . i',re' ........„.„............,, ,, tgi' •. . . . ,. . i, .uoil , i - . 1 . •: ••••• / 1 i i . • .),4 I ■ '. .4 .. A '. .\\.. , i ,....,,,, ,. .....,i ,''t T. ,CO •, t, ...,• r '"--.....;tfi,,...• S .1,„,q'4; . . ".. Cl '''' , • ,i.',.,`1.4.. .' ., so...^. .4''0'''' . ,7.,..;., . .V.1,,,,, .1;., . Obi 2' ''•-•"L•••••• •D1F••.',10.1%.' e. ...' 4'"?' ''t,, ,;',I .: . . ••`,•:'Ph. ' '•:..,•,..• •...,...,...• ....',,•io'i■•••••••'... ..";- ' • • • . .. •• , '• -'•..1:-..t,,i•■•••••••-r; “ t- ',.,.■...60•••■•4. 1 IL,...4,••• t. 4 , ••••• .•,'••s•••,.''•'"•:•., ., li .-----• ' I '•C .1.. . ',m w,,.,,....9k•.Z.,....t'''‘W.,..',„',...P7,.-.1,',1,.,••..,:•,..,,1/46.:a'A.t!tt:.!,.11.1„•' ,...t.P '.r*t,W.i'l•44`,,,ttif.=.ts,"•,,, . • .: •', •• •- ,• r*P'r '",' MO'. -••••'. s,:'.■ti"..4 " ''. t,•,'',.'ll•t'''..!•••• '7Aiet.14.11,... Jt,..6.. • .I c.• ■ ......0'.' .41' •,.,,'• :;*,,..".„,••, , . .pir 0.4. ,l,.4,,i ••,"• ••••A ,. ,, ...*.t,.... li: . •.tl.•!..,, ,_____,,'...',',...,4,,,,7`"V.e• , ' •?...t.'. ".. •■'.',.,.,./.'''•H. .1...,,,■••:,`,•, • -, ‘,1,•,,r;,..,i , 11111h,4,',1•0,.." ,"rt", • ..e....44te•",-,,,,',, 9.`'..'•A'': ,;„%".''''.v.:7:4-7::•.',/•-'•.."''.1'.:l'•:4,0,41.'7'.."'A.,I4A.,,r47.:41'.1'. • 4,.:';';;;:77.'t'47•r•ift'''''''''r.14 .'11',Iiiiik''';'a':,' ••;.'",• l'?'., 7'',/,..,':, . ..v. :,,14..:.`,•417,;"•."44.','%et,:, .,•"„•;:i..A'.;••:',.'i•:-,, ^,^...4p,"*•!',j''''....1:4 4'•.''%,r,7,41.7.•'•.•..;''''0'.7i4 41471';:''4.,'.4'•",V:':•'' 4.:'''•4''',.'''''';1'1'::"' '''''''"'CI°•• ',., ft,''•..q,4'.•'`j ,1•.'t .•,',. ',,,4'',..,i,'.{:•;s0••••'...t.'....,It''01.•A 4'1,.,■•••''',...,iit.,,;.f.i,',./.1,,,,,.,,,,,,,•„,4,,,4..,•..." ;10.,,'•,-;',.•••1,,,• •••',..„t•,..•••.t.,•••••','t••••,,,.,,. .• . , .. '`..,i'4'•••1'•'V''',,.i•I t:''.7-'7;••4,"'....7''',7)",:.. ..P,...';'.',;.,,7 r.i.i:.;.,?,',',,i4j.,,,-,14'; .,..:.V.L:.i&i....?:,4 ,,,,,..4'7,,',41,,,,.,,..., ....•,;,,,••••,,,,,,,,,:,,,•,-,,,,,,•• ,.,,.::.4,.,-,:e...,,,- . ,,:•,.,,.';,4,:...-•411.),,..4:41;,,A1',h,.•.,•,t'4.',,,e..4),;;•,11-tti:4,Ti.:,i',4it',''1'**:;•0::`',;•:i-l'-‘4`'`I'i241;'4•41C,;k4'.1.1;k:',',. `t;,',V.' ..','"'..F.,•"••''''''''..'••,`:..:•:';';:•`'•''.%'.• . ,, ,•.„;4,,-,'-,';!,,.,.;.,..•.:'•*,, ..,,•,,,. ',',',,•;,,*;,,,,,!•*A.,,,I.,•",?:,,,;•-,•„:1,,,,, ,,•fi;',1.,, .•,1';',!,:':.,,.A.,•.•'.."t ° -.,...•144: •,-',..,,‘i,i'i•-•.;,•.• .,' .'*v.''':',',,-.. '••••••:.•' •••, . . . . 1t4"11,P.F2',''V'f,--4q'.*•0'14:$4,.-11,,;.$1,,,P.,L4f141.1.cf.ia:P&:.'ve• 414.,.•,;;4•:1:;(4';,;-:*‘■ •,. ..• -'•— , . . . ..,10•., ....,•,;(-,.::,•?"f•-:f-''•••• '.v'7 ..it,:,....,,',',4V'''''t‘.,',1%.,1.14';,'"%i•''','•.;t..'.;414,t:'•'Aitgl,P,'''•"ekl'••..'.i 4'•.'''."..,44 • ,' .., ,r‘..' '. •' i''•'ti,'"'•,, . ... .... ,.,%.,,'',:4:1,",,,z.,:•.,/,41,A1,',1.',e;:f.;:k.",..•% .:'•.44'.. 7i". ,4f1„..#,,4,4".. ;,1'f:,.!,4:2, ';'''''',e»''.':''''',..,"".':.',1,.':".'7'''''',. '.':4:',' s'.' 6,,'•!'...,A,:,,, . . , .. ',.','•,4•:',-;.:,A.\'‘Ig•,‘"‘',..,-.1 4"„‘q,,',1;'?•1;'::*I l',, ,:•11,,.,%;'';'''f:-..•!1',?-t:•. ,?.'2•14{',441.4•.`li';'.o41'.*IA.P,4itt;:q2•1?,,InA.Ifi..'',,,i'..,1,•,,•,''„,'t '.',•'..1;,''';',..', .11'.'4!2';1,''.'.*'.."'".,,..':','..,"•;•,.,•: . '.•,•kr.•. ''',,•fr'P ':r•"`•441'''''',...,,,...i•q*,..1,,,,..1,4,.?".:0,1...:,,,,,t,••4.„,,,,,,,.%.,,,,,,-.,)-5,,,,,,,,,,,;1.4-,,,;:. ,,.S#4,4,i, , . ■ I' 'n..:.,, ',..1,',,,„,':.,T. 'f....',,',7'..:4 7.:,4 Aqi,k;'•..1%,i'"'"?A:'7',.4,,.%,, V q''''A0A,.,;'',."'.'",",.:$,,.:.::;7 .4'.•'-.; .• •'''.^..."i•''',,:..4.''',.;''',.i..;,.. 44'.`.,':•,:.'•`;':. . . •.;..%.'y.',„,:t„,•,,...,..7 ,:; ,:•.,•, ,;••;.y..i..,. p..,.:?,,‘,47:,,,...•: :,'„1^.•'i'.1.'17".''171 %,"4:1V:'!.41'7,:■••?)'0 c'C''''••.,;'.'-,:L 71,4:,•...,..,:•'•'... '• 'ts , ,, .. .,. .%, . . , •--',"•4.:', ',,•;,'..,—:,-,•=•,-1:'.•Y,,,,,,..•'.. .H.,'•'• sl,..2,'•%,,t.v,,7,1.i.•_,,•,,!,',,,,.•••..- . .•‘,.,,...4,,,l'o:,,,• . `'i'.,',"•4."••c''''. ''.' ...••, , od.,••,,,,h,„:,:,,,,,,,,,,,:i,,,,..,,,•, ,..,,r1/,;,,,t,•'-:4,1,),..i,4'4?4,tt:0,tir"..,,,•:',..it•I'li'lc.,4, 7 +7,,,,a.,..cei.,,,A•44,,,,,t,:ot.„.40,1,,:, , I .•...1.. i,,,:,r.,,,4:i A '' •'4,..‘:I'0 ' :,,.''':1.;,'4.4' 4.4,i0:41:,1'3'.';e:,‘',.,Y7,,,,,itl*,..{kitl'?I'-':.rV,i4,;,',^'1;'',..(ii'•;',.V.' ',11:P.',%,V.WrieW,V.t1.1',4".'-:?76"::.':;V:ii ri":',"`'''+■'Ak,''.511'fA'.'?"/'11.'.:.'1'-'''....,'11'.;;?t,4' . '''.11.'4'1'''''''''' ,644::''"'",ri'■, '-,;4•Vai/ii.''''.1:1■:•410.1,7y.':?.,,Y;;;;;'%;,'."'4:•.',4,4,.r.:14:'41,•4t;•1444:447',4,413,;.,,,,i,:•79 ,4":"'"'4'''''''''''17"'4.77'41":.:".4'tt'')-:V• . 1;;;•' ' '44' '4' •''4+-k,'4'. •' ,,,,liki,,t,--,,,ii.,';',$.j7•'''',k..•',K,••••••,;Al,...)•,,,••.,, ,t,•., ,Pt,..,.t.,-,.,I,„•,,,,•orthp• ,-, ••4,•••••, .•'',;,••1',,,,,.•''.,`tr'''t'.',•rt•4' ';',,, . .'t,,,V,it?'.e,(1,':'''.',••:r4-lei,: ''As,''.4i 1-,,, .:,.-..,..,,,,-,q,,,,,,-.,:c „.„,ii,;',.',..,',,..g.,i,,,'„'1.1.,,r4,-!'Ar,10,•''.. .....!'-'ut.,,'.',:,'.',•,,,,::.-co.„rri.,, .,v.„.,,..,‘...tv•0.(,,v.., .. r.2,f,V.,.:,•,."4"ki,k.,,,Q 4,1,,rti.77,,,„,,,ta".:.,41,7 po C`.$1...e.,,,,,%41'.7,•4!!,,,,,,•,/14,r',A1,;MAP,iv•M,OVA•44.'1,'P...:.....'•,;:l'i.,,4%■•'p',.: '."4:','' '.44,,,',,, 7•'"t'''' ., . .., . .. . . • 1 . . . : . . gPO .. „Ar - t..4, .A.Lizie;ss 5...tg-*-e.vittsz::6-14- - ' • . ' ...1 . , .., A . . .,, 4 . ' ii , . . .. . . ,,,:. ,,,' s.., 1 '• h',1:•- •,'; '4,,,',. '.k,,, . . ..,'.i','''''.,'• ‘, . Al 1 .,t4,....,:;-. .:„4,• ..?.,,P:'.:',..,'',,•. . , . ,. ‘4.`,1;:,,,,,,,..,? '''•. .„ ,,,i, , . •,• . ., . . -.'--•'X t Sr.l. C.'• ' '"4:1,,;4^;t;,,,4e,',4,4",:,i,*,'ii;•••[•":.'',:,'.'",:;. . ....... • •,,,,,:a;•:•ti4.",kiii?i,.,!,.;.4„,•,...,,,,I.',.,•.•;• . . , . ,.,. ., • -•••''''U-.;t• ',J.,, ..,.,'., ' I,,, ,. ,' t ••' • ' 7ViZt:E."ST"khAiDit4 .., . ' -*'•••. , . ;II.*' '"• ..■ ,,.11 . ,---,,,,,,t.4,..F.,44 r.Sk.%,0,,,,t,- 1'',..,'.;)••,,--' ta . ..,, 8 ,,,,..,......„....1. - ,•,...; - ti i...t.:,,r, 1 'i A f'„,,... ,-,- ...,. . . ' ."-=ttlai't%% 't(...41.1.% 41toti 4' .•' "'. ''•'... lifr ,.1.".6'•.'' .• .7 ',A.' . f'' •V;44,'•' . ''. •.i.,. ,14,,.40.0 , ,e4•.:;,..,, • t,, . ,t•''''''''',''' ;. ','' . .,'• •.'4 .' . ''',"ti' ''.'P',;' •'''''' ;''' ''■■•• ',' :t74 ' A ,'''' ., - 4 ;'.. • tr'C'''' . •.‘' . , . ' C.*At''t • . • '••. '; •• • .''' • ; '' ..1 •,./."•`, f'••;.*.•..• .....',:,.''e.''''•''',;'t',''' . •'•,''.... ',, '• •. ' . '.."''''''.tt'''''..' ' ,• ,., „•, . ' . . ,••• .. . . • • ,t •• . . . ' , ''..' • •' t.,.;''•*; i.. t,4•, .'.' '- ; .L...,,, ,'.. ::'' .'; 5", l''- ''''' •• s, •. •• • •,....' • • , • . . . , , 4 =t Iip1° 4 t keV . • •4' .* ' • , • , ■ 0 ••••••••••■■•••■.....■■•......................e...................0.61 Kr, ( r i . BLAK # 4 •r , ; --,:, ---1 C 3 '.-- .,r■■ ''... ". Canopy Fascia ' 7.4-.r------..--.----.,-- . • - -..,-, . -. •,-- 2._ , - . 1___________________ -----------_----,-------- , . r . . , , DARK GRAY #33 1 Texaco No 33 Dark Dray i Building Fascia i rilialsi... ' ....1/110111.4111.110.1411 (all buildings) II 111111111111111 r • Canopy Columns , , 1 , . , II it 1111111 RED #31 --, i ,4-..,--,,-.,..- -.. . . . , 11111 Accent Band (all buildings) 11111 Sign Letters for , • "Texaco & Logo" 1 I 1 •1 . t , I 1 1 i LIGHTGRAY #32 i • . . r ` I Base color for •.• all buildings ,..1.,,,,,,.{4 letst,,fl• ■,, ,), ,,., , ,. tf. ,, ..,A 111P-,ktr:"01:4,, '. .„ .' , y ,*„ ;',• ' 1 ''.ge,,.r,,V,a.":-,d,'■".44 { • ,1', '1" 1, .,, •, 1 , 01 t ,01 i i I WHITE #1 t 0 . 8CHEmATIc All painted letters Ir ELEVATIo N uStar" of Logo sign , 8 cal e 3/8 oi ,.... 1 i—0 I. qUatd Posts Edge of Islands . mans. %meal SYSTEM 2000 COLORS Sb.1 • •,,,T., •• ',, - , • A. A • r , N 0 TI C E OF P U B L I C H E ARING Notice is hereby given that the Tigard Planning Commission, at its meeting on Tuesday, June 5 1984 at 7: d P.M., in the lecture room of Fowler Junior High School, 10865 S.W. Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon, will consider the following application : FILE NUMBER: SCE 2-84 ' APPLICANT: Richard L. Webb, Architect OWNER: Texaco Inc. 10320 S.W. Washington St. 3800 NW St. Helens Rd. Portland, Oregon 97225 Portland, Oregon REQUEST: Approval of a Sign Code Exception to allow the replacement of two free standing signs where only one is permitted on property zoned C-G (Commercial General). LOCATION: 11834 8W ` Pac�:fxc Uig.hwaYa Tigard (Wash, Co. Tax trap 281 1>3B • Tax Lot 301) . (See :map on reverse side) The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance With the rules of Chapter 18:32 of the Community Developtient Code and rules of procedure of the Planning Commission. Any persons having interest in this tatter may attend and be heard; or testimony may be submitted in writing to be entered into the record of the initial hearing. ' For further inforutation less Planning p 609-4171. „ p S e W. Ash Avenue TIGARD CIT'y RALL 12755 (Corner of Ash Avenue & e contact t�e P ann�:ii De art�ment at 639 lBtirnham Street), or contact your Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO) #..5, _,,, ra Naub Chairperson ... eb��� Phone Number . ,� 620-8425 ert (pm/025/P) . . . . . 1, •. . ,. ,. , • • ' . ; ...•' r?.. .. . . ,... . . . . , ..,.. ... # <C# ., 291 M,E. 56.0r C' .N V 0.5\ . . • ! . . • 1 . • . , . f -' . f' •' . itAirk* . I . ‘ • .. . . •.. CD ■,..„1 61 . co ' .. #414(// . I 'le • ,0 11'5 c ,..i1/1/// ," S 2'elf/40„Ifb ' ,: :•,a,. . (....) 4\\•4 .., .. , 6.. 0 \t' b•CP ' ,...r.4.0,;6,...'' • ., . , 49/0". ti- ,!,t7,1:;0411' ) i! ..• „ _ • . • 0, 1.,,,n,4/1 • -11,,,:t ,',."'' . . . 1 . ' . W V) ...... ,. ' tr) ...... ‘V•S , , .• . . . f ri 44'1 I 1 _ . , ,. \ t■14 .. ' - , ■ ',.!,,‘,;A ,-;-',401 J' . . •""''''...:':4: . 4.4••4 •,,...-. • I •",'' . ., ; It (.., • .,,• .•.... ., 1 . . . . „.... ,....... .,.. . . 0 ,,. ....„ , 7 ' • '•'I 4"'eilk4 -4,4)....11_,___ 0 ....- ..-- . „ . ......) ....- ,. ..,-. ). . • .. . .... (-5 .... . ,,, ...• - .• i ...,„4,....-„,....,......„ ,, ljar.t441A11.0A111111.. ,...„........ ... .„..... .., ..,,.... .. , c:9.e.ii IL-5111 MIA in o ...., , ..-- ' , . ' .....-- * • 9.,.--et 1 H .• . :. 1.,,. . . •,-.. .4)..,,I. :. -,--•51....:•, ■ (1,1 kI‘,,,..-- --'--- 1: 1.. -:-.:,,.... .......---- ..---- •-•• ' 1 . • •, '....;.?..„.1...,. it, f , ..-C` • . .,...• . . , .,, . . • ..4 . . 1 . . •• • %IV■ . . Y. -1-1• '''''' .', . § 1 '.'•\---r.) 1 ,,, .. . . . (P.,s'I't-. . • . . . .. • . . . , . k . .• . . .... .. ' ...,,,.. . , . .. .... .• ' ' Voll's...---z. ..•-,...,i' . , .. • , „..-- , , , , ,.--,...,,,,..... .. ., „.........- • -------. 1. . . .....-0 - .: •-.4.,, ..--' I -....„:.„ Ad • 0 ....„... . . . ...,:..., . . -----:. 4 . ''' '' \ , • ',/-;,,,,,, q0 44' ,, . ....' , .;,.....-■-rt, .•,•.... •% ; • ,.., . ' • tt, t-,-' -509° 29 ") a)0 , ,, ...:. 0 d ; ., • T:4 ,.............29...............____Yo.. . '''o.n ' .io til „.,..4Vi • ..• . . .......i. ".-'-,:t. .;,,9291 Ittr g , ,,,'---- oi-4 "?.... -- c.200 • ...„ 09, - -" ,• . ''* •1::'-t, ‘r.' --- i AiSeot , , • - • '''Soi ;:if•-:... It . -... s .. .. • - ..,-6 2 4 I. w . 1' • • . (.9 ';-..' I \ - , - 1 '4,7 \r■ . • .t 0 ,,, 4 .7.., .... -' '''' g C 7 \ '7:-.....:::-.1.,. `.4\ 1./..bitia •,'-' i a., . ■ ',..-,..".. 0.;Win . , • . . 4 4 tn.-',, , — i A' IA d -..., s,. 1•„.,. , .,.,, •,.• \„..0 • '''•'•?A, 0 : ., ••••.., ., , . . ,-.4 ct • ''A. —'. In ., . \ tn . N ' lk i'."): t14., '' 9 °'3' '. '''' Cr j • ■ ' ) ‘00'° .■ • 9' tok.S. . ,..„,,,..„-.............. i. .?. .....„, *, .4°41,,,,'-'1-..,,., '‘I ''' • . ,■ eis> ,.. ,„.,.fr,.. ,e). „.../.Iv 4 itti,4!:, .9/,/,,• 112 . .• • • . , N 10.il' . ''''''„- ' •,,...,,,+.....,,...,,,,;.....'4 1 4, 1. • . .• Plot.„.... . . .. ... .„„. Plot' PI a\--'- '. . t. . • .4,1,...14....2,0_,.., . . . . .,.... : . . .. ... • .. .. . . . . , , .... .... ., .... The B8roud Co, (,. . . 1 Crow #67 i . . • T.O. Box 5396 , .. , • - Portland, OR 97228 , . .. . ,,,•. • .... . , . .. . . , . Knauss Chevrolet Company . ' 11880 SW Pacific Hwy. .. Tigard, OR 97223 ., ''. ._ Crow-Spieker,-Hosford #67 ,.. • P.O. Box 5396 . . . _ .t, Portland, OR 97228 . . . .. . .,.. , . • Robert Deuth • , . • .,, 11831 SW Pacific Hwy. •., Tigard, OR 97223 . . . . . . HOFFARBER 12005 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 . .. . , • , . •, Graphic Properties P.O. Box 43 -, .... Lake 08wagO, OR 97034 ,.. . , . . RICHARD L. WEBB, ARCHITECT 10320 SW Washington St. . , Portland, Oregon 97225 .. . i . TeXacO itit. 3800 NW St. Helens Rd. Portland, Oregon 97210 . . Debra Naubdtt 14865 8W 80th Place Tigatdi Oregon 91228 • . , . , . , , . . , -,, ... , . ',. . . AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) �, County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) j, I, Kathleen Reffett , being first duly sworn, on oath depose and say: That I am a office aid.p for The City of Tigard, Oregon. ' 1 That I served notice of hearing of the . Tigard Planning Commission of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each of' the following named persons on the 25th day of Mav 1984, by mailing to each of them at the address shown on the attached list (Marked Exhibit B), said notice as hereto attached, desposited in the United States Mail on the 25th day of 1984, postage prepaid. 1 Se retary r . Person who deliv ted to POST OFFICE Subscribed and sworn to before the on the _ day Cy ., , , 1984:, a• A 1► ; NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires:,11 -ca( -' S'" .. N .f. ...V'fft'f• .Mnpl.w».)hiku.xm w,nvnyry .n. - .• -- - :-.. : ,. .. _ .- - ---. • ' . _ ,.:•-,..:. _ - . _._ - : ._ __ r , _ . - ---- _ • • , .._ . ... ... ■ . • .• . . , - 4; : - 4 • ' "- is- - -- -- • - - PHONE(50&)-684-0360 Notice P a BOX 370' TIMES PUBLISHING C OMPANY Legal c, vir) ,iicei:7-6 4/86 - BEAVERTON.OREGON'97075- iry oz_ Legal Notice Adverting eTretai rSsihnege't Notice C i- 11-'4 a4R: City of Tigard. POI Box 23397 a OR 97773' --•---- Tigard.,, • G Duplicate Affidavit 0- to- -i. -z • -- 4---r----;:i--,-,-._1--'-.-_-_:;--.'-j=' -.j.„,'- '1,•:-.-1.'-_`---:-..4 „...--,,,_ .,--7-..g.-_-_-, -.'-T--.i•r- :- -: ,::•,,:,-...-- -.----,. .,m---1---..,4,,--OREGON -,,:_-:;,;_il • F.7--------,771.7:.;•:__:,I--i ,-..i._._ ;:- : -5.:;. -•-:- -.- ti--•::_011Euvri, itt-OF TSAR _541.:07,,,-- AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION: :i7,!_;;,'',--i7- i.-.'-',,,iii:_-_----f - : -- -. =7--, :-, -_: •= '::-.-------!''„7--..; ---..7:1',-----L;I:-j-5-',-----,,,,:i P='_$,, - 11 --.' ''.liCil*:01?:-.I )SS I STATE OF OREGON. -----'t--:--,:=-.-';'• • -------_,- '-•-,.- ,.,-%-iat--- d:'- -k..ii1-_,_e_'-ifigar,,..4:111rglisz ich, --.,,„1„. ,- ,e.c,%1!:..170rti:.,. couNrc OF WASHINGTON,- ) - i"--'-- - - l -'- -- '"'*111:be---011s1-- : t- o*Ier--JuP4Q ‘,- ---4i-be'0144-T, :---al i: L Susan, P-Inkle-y 4 --Iii 1:631"111'gr''g.i;rAtil3(1'P*".'4--:- - 'lnicirlilaUPa3-- --.-'1-ken:(14,:!JI,g7-i-!-:4t- TiiiidW.Iii4'e'::_,,''47P ---: di:die:D.44'Further t it 1,275 ,::$,W--f-:-...-------, 6eing,first i clerk,of the -2..- ,:i.., ed ini_ORS 193.0 duly:sw.orr!,,deposer and say thartit._am;tdher-rAlThdveesrtisin196: v--K42g5csvzVizalnut.,,710..F.-4---- laeelopAln., -,11.v+-,Y„-' — ,"---- a:plaftning74,. - f''-''--`DliettOr-,9 .-: - ]-6394171----_'.z HEARINGS i: Director or his poncniepraai a newspaper of general gard in,the iv.i._ --- -.,--- by calling --.,--tfflue--------?- ,- Tcpty,-,-#5',', 1,.r---ptrt11-1 01 :9..n7;.-irzro.T--..-...._. ,_ P ,- - . ,,--4--,-cf,..„Rq.- -,-,„,--.:. eimitied:f ,...: 0 €_ ,circulation as detiTni 11 :: "4t'Mg4L4-'': 41"Il4131-rOt 0)4.:_.4;:f--„ ,,--;=,,,.. and 19a.020;publisheslaatt-e; aforesaid county and.. e -i=. -wc-7-7-----0.Pg .12 :_1=tec, ,tan.d!raFFs . -.._ (-.5gt.:zw2sk I. - At 4.44„:10JSE;-..T..:1 Public Hear-ing that the epac0tvi_P. • •.,-stkr pacific TAvYs=.-__-,_-..„,„.:A,ARI-ANc. :-,..: „?...„_,t,:i__-.• .„..,„_„, ,-•-.,. To Located 11834 .,. ,.=-titt-94;4LAP#.1? 11==-1 riiiiieit Oa-1-0ca.m.,,,,-.--idi,.11E1Pkg,F5 --.,--,-_,_-,7--- ..aliezt.,It,12PIX:44=-4 ... er for a printed copy of which„is.hereto annexedlwas psuubcicisehsesdivien,athnect k-,:stii.,0E7vEL0 ..-:„.,:___,._‘:-,,--•,-2 --='__.=: =e-nt:ini,-9.0pet ..,,;,_:-.side of$01.135th, :1 '- - ugGEgc,--,T.P.,-q:4t-7,------':-."'aititial'AeYeloPT_, --*--,,:tocatoa- a ' ' ----.--•:i. 061---1-.-,,- -'--r---,-1 I _.,:1 -=_. _,,,-.-'aii--•: -'n1-111._,..iirairgleYA-dr-e-51-.:..p44.,‘,-i-•-git il.i3aa.ceTi-_-.Prorrrt,(w.--'-c.3y4.- -- .-4tsoliimET3pq419v 9:4,I.,:10 eptke issue of said newspaper _ -,- -4-,4dirianCeteT..?'! .. C, .ecutive in the,following issues_ Nsf-s61101101.Fetr3--- '--!-I,sir w.GKPE-V- .. -i---ted--iaCilktte '-:=- --_,---I iontlx9f:-.. „ -.--- likvroor$P --...,-7.development .77-t-:-„T1-=',IiiIii§ClAIIK)!.w,4 Nay 2.9,„ 1.984 mile• = ToptifPrr • =--" '--d-ential:*v-'-'', -----,-:-•;- rets#6611-1!—•,,------=--,-43--t teal r'SITF:-P.P/F-.4..,--4.ar7d11-8(Y111,11jTeSI---:--;,trh , tiia':1"atVLocated:---:" .-.;:i4W:7CiiT4er.,. -:,- tFor=',app_F97-._--t-iii&,:6--aw,-*T:.rp_4uc#- iti,--ifeit 0:4thi , ,i-t 100)--:_ii: --,---1 :,...---------), ati.-Tig*t_OP'V,,C1.:.,,,ft,_-- t&gi-Iti,-:,ptop #X-,„,,,---ett,r1$1494kci:._Q,- -,.ktiotNp,,..N.p,94. t. AreAll.P ._.,iiii,;,: , ,, ./e P----r'do- ts--* ...PPrk-:.--,,:---..,-,7-,-,-,.,,',)iiiwv-' ": Tigard - ,lioti-_A-8...*-F.IWP---*,-.,--„•,, , _ _ -......„„. 5v1134„, --*;„----' gArl?"4CL'' : - '- .-diNIV'Pl34;,_::-_-_-, -;:'-' .,,' iai6i-A4 , . - beficl_141,and-. y-E<OCCPPATI- ,--hr.np„4-44:10,-QP,._ ,...tv.4 - Wr ---APPEAL HOME ,.-=, -'' :.'. --)',',-•,,--- '', -- --;:-"fa-1-0r:".“Y„:,:--,=-::,, a,•ili-4-43tr-,-1 1::=APP ---.::.----,—*..--trpe--tof.s.apPro- -- =----ar-R-4:loc*•:!- -=.7-,-,--:--,__-,:---,i 84- n _ . - -- e _s A ne, 1,, 19 -'ii-,-01:?,-;:;.-,E---T;-=:.,_-•:=- ,,,-;,-;--1.„--4 '-fig-..=traiini- ----777-,„,,&.-,,13ingeiti.,-'gt-11Tri--;-. -:=:_--7--.;•.--.*.Ir-.:11) •1_1 -4,--;-'''--,-kaa:aPPF :•-',`, ''.--= f.theiiiiiindick.---P-i!'-- -:, -7-.:=='--- -,----,,--:---J--i-•:--Tis-,_-ii-.A--:,-.-:•:',. ci...,41,.:or.rk._To;b efor _m ,r i ,--44- ittn-_-/neiol7--. .---,,, k-lo-f-.5A00)-;,,,;:::---,,,,,,•-,.:-.!,,,-•.-,._----,7_.,--"--7.-- -_-1_,;-„-,--_-,-- ------'-'-- r_P*1.6,7"7-7---cwc-INL 2SVI.,,R-- --,„-,--,.,.. -- - -;..,_-_-_-_-.-....,. Su fiScribed an residential , .-1,1-4:29----i$:?:,... ----,-,------- I if . ---.- ,„ ...- , - - : NbtarY Public for(3reg°11 3116/87 ,i7-..-64K.----Pubil.s11.;.-- .------s---- f-,-,--, _ _.-,... ,---,------- .-: i E4 .-r-GOrti—m-iss' rait'ExP 7-r - AFFIDAWIL__ . . _. . ..::, . . ._ __ .... ....: 7- • t . .... __ . ------ - ---- Y REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS TO' DATE: y 4,r tn84 „ FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: ,.i: C Q CI e_.Exgarat iASS 2.7a4.:._._ 9 R • . Sign Qo�. S �pt�at SL a7.1-ow ':- o. .. . .. - �. _ ' • o , o - i, n-r it - .R. p •.- .,-. —G •mtt' 1 l o,' -. at 1: S. P. if' Hi.h�. Ti!,;rd C. axax aa_p 2S 1`]B x Lot 301) • Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish use application, • 19 gt� You may, ication, se need your comments by May 14, 1 y sh to comment on this appl y pace provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. Ii_you are unable to res o�nndhy', the above P phone confirm at your lcomme comments writing contact noted below with your comments and ,..._..,.� staff y g as soon as possible. If you have any y: questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O. Box 23397, Burnham and Ash Ave. , Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Kith Liden PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: proposal 3 We have reviewed the ro osal and: have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. '. Please refer to the enclosed letter. :.:r...:.. Written comments: ' 3 . Nance of Person Commenting! t Phone No, CSLi m 03' 6P V tak, qii,Aj Ch-9111 d'(14t-0 , REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS TO: En ineerin r 1� sd 1 �1l1 DATE: FROM Tigard Planning Department : RE: , •. - . - • ' , •• . - )t411 • t, 1.- - . : 0"4 ' • ," • - - �.�,• , ' : ?,• 2daraftwallaarearl 1 .• n i r • •4 ►, • . ' 701^ 4 . *OW • to _t P. if' , Hit Ti. . W. . • _Tam Man 2, 1 Lot 301) . ' Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a repot and recommendation will be a• prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by , 19 8 You may use the space provided below or attach a a• separate letter to return your comments. zfyou are unable �to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments, and confirm your , comments in writing If you as soon as possible. have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O. Box 23397, Burnham and Ash Ave. , Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639-4171. , STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden 1 , PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: RWe have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office: Please refer to the enclosed. letter. Written commentst .. . • • • • h r • .1 . , .g` tvir� :+ � 1 N�Ehie of Per�koex Comment�.n � Ad t,, .,. .... ' P O ne 2, (KsL:pm/o356P) n.a REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS TO: R i d i r,g.llap rs m DATE: T14; ...1 a 4_.._..-._._...�-----.._ FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: a,gn Code Ex n ion , , -: - . . - . . R ' '• ' ' .vj31 of a• alga ZQci. xr .,j_t on_to aT j.o the repla. . - - . . . 4 . 4 where a3 �e_i.s Dezm _tted .on r ned lu�ared at 1, 834 SW Pa" ifc Highw_,,ay Tigi�c1Wh: GO. Tam NtaD?S 1—�BB.Tax Lot 301) . Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by „F , 19 84 You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. you. are unable to resond b p above date please p hone the staff the noted below with your comments and d ss confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any i questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O. Box 23397; Burnham and Ash Ave. , Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: 4 proposal. We have reviewed khe and have no objections to it. s Please contact our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments: • f Home of Person Commenting. Phone Na 4 (KSU:prn/035613) a MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO Tigard. Planning Department FROM: . Brad Roast, Building Inspector/P° SUBJECT: Sign Code Exception 2-84 • I most emphatically oppose any approval to amend the Sign Code in such a manuer. If there comes a day where "non-conforming" signs are to be forced into compliance, approval of such a request will give no basis to back-up such a demand. This business has far exceeded the allowable signage permissable, if any action should be taken, it would be to force removal of all illegal signs. .* /)*:' • • x • RICHARD L WEBB ARCHIT ECT 10 320 S.W. WASH. ST./ PORTLAND, OREGON 97225 (503) 292-9432 April 17, 1984 Re. Si n Exception Request" 1.MIOIC� ` IYIltM,Ol�I at Texaco Service Center Pacific Hwy West & SW Garden Planning Department Tigard, Oregon #8L02-A City of Tigard P.O . Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Sirs: On behalf of Texaco , Inc. , I am submitting the required documents and drawings for your Design Review and Sign Exception Approvals that are required prior to issuance of Sign Permits. As a Consultant for Texaco, Inc. , I , Richard L. Webb, Architect, have been retained to pursue the required approvals and sign permits necessary to implement Texaco ' s area-wide sign replacement program. The Texaco sign request introduced to staff• members including Ed Waldon the Department and Bill Monahan, Planning Director, at informal meetings to obtain comments, restrictions, requirements and directions related to the proposal . A request to hold our submission until the May meeting was acknowledged to allow the City of Tigard time to review and implement the "Approval Criteria for Exceptions to the Sign Code" that were introduced and acted p the April 3, Planning Commission Meeting. d It was our understanding that specific items were in question that directly effected the review 4`. and oUtcoirie of the Texaco Sign Request. Thus our sign.. ro osal request Is hereby documented t P p g y as follows with a comment from Texaco , Inc. , that "the proposed Sign re.,, placeme nt request is submitted ithe b est i e - an i n oadethe existing outdatedsi a g e situationand improve the Texaco Service Center identit y within the Tigard Community' . Sign Replacement Intents As previously stated; the Sign DV Dings reflect a neW P y area-wide attempt "up-date"p- • ii ea mpt by Texaco, Inc. ,Inc. , to u da•�e and implementing ... g Y - ci hies by "well-planted"Modernize Ze t eir existin ii ervice en "er fa si gna ge i s included as m an overall Well-p anrie � sign program. of AS shown on the draWings; g g � p the total design concept in lieu of the existing non- ..la net Service denter. of sins that exist at the p g.. y y g presn dolor's used for both the building ' and Si..,.na.�e •"ro rams reflect deli n continuity and good +� g P g � .. color coordination by uSii g contrasting colors of similar hues, , 6oN rkia Page 2. ,r • F„ • i t , JI Code Compatability: The proposed Sign Replacement Request deviates from the Tigard Sign Ordinance on various technical requirements . but meets the basic intent of the Ordinance by proposing I' signage that has visual appeal and overall design quality that best serves the interests of the Community and the property Owner. � - As shown on the drawings, two specific signs are included with this ro osal and each is explained as follows: p p r r A. Free Standing Identification and Price Sin: Located at the northwest corner of the site , the existing sign is proposed to be replaced with a new 24-ft. Nigh double-pole , two sided, sign that incorporates the Texaco logo and name, diesel service identification, and fuel price signage that presently exists at three locations on the site. . d height. eq ..- T he �inoreaSed request uest is essential to maintain the 10-ft. minimum corner height restriction and integrate the sign into One "all-purpose" identification, {, price informative free standing sign. The proposed free standing sign also exceeds the area limitations by 12 sf each face and consideration is requested in the form of a "Sign Exception" on both "deviations" based on Article 18. 114. 140-A of the existing Tigard Sign Ordinance . . • As a m a fter of re.cord, the new sign proposal replaces the existing revolving ; Texac o sign with attached price and product identifw cation • sig`iage that totals 156 sq. ft, per face In addition to this, price signage at the opposite end of the site (approx. 75 sf) '. will be eliminated. B. Free Stands Hihwa; _ Orientated. Sign.. : �� { , • This "logo-only' Sign is proposed to replace the ,. g - �, existing 55 ft. high s�:n 1�e letter Texaco sign taohed s] :.. ,•, gns) located on the northeast (and other ate side : freeway` (Mwy.e#2i7) adjacent to the The intent eofl the anewaproposal is to conform to th nation-wide indus.rat' standard of identification g ed log os only at freeway orientated by nationally recognized g y sign locations. Although the existing sign. may .legally .. in as a "granf'ath`r type: of i exception to the Tigard remain •.g. , Texaco feels It iS ins the best interests of therdommunit... to replace the exist ,,. i • Sign Wit the existing . . h e new deS. proposed . • ign that Will 'enhance the surrounding area i •4 r i Page 3. 1 ‘: Consideration is requested to allow the second free- standing sign and accept the reason for it ' s existance as a "Freeway Orientated Sign". Up until the new • Sign Ordinance was adopted, such signs adjacent to freeway rights of way were allowed and acknowledged by the City of Tigard as such. Again it is Texaco' s intent to upgrade the existing Service Center' s identity within the Community by investing in a major sign replacement project that is in the best interests of all parties concerned. Proposed Signage Details: Both free Standing signs are shown in detail on the enclosed drawings and are assumed to be "self-explanatory" . A brief description of each sign is noted for reference as needed: A. Free Standing Identification & Price Sign: A 24-ft, high, illuminated, double-pole, two-sided sign structure with the following signage is proposed: 1 . A 6-ft. x 7-ft. Texaco logo with the word "Texaco" below in ten inch high letters. The "Star-logo" is white on a red background surrounded by the black bo w rder as shon. The word "Texaco' located ,below the logo is in red lettering. 2. The 11 -6° x 6' -0" "Diesel" sign is dark grey With white 9" capital and 7" lower case lettering. 3. The LP -6" x 6'-o" price reader board is a white background with black lettering for the product and related price nUmbers. 4. Pole supports for the sign are 8" x 8" Steel tUbes • painted black and attached to structUrally designed • concrete footingd. 5. The sign is to be installed in the same location as the existing sign, surrounded by a protective island planter, B. VI: A‘ A 40-ft, high illUtinated, doUble-pole, two- sided sigh structure with the following Signage is proposed: le A 13' x 13 Texaco "Star-logo" sign onlY, The word "TeXaco" iS nOt propoSed With this Sign. 2. Pole are to be approximately 12-inch diameter, painted black pipe column attached to structurally designed concrete footings. •. Po Page 4. 3. The sign is to be installed in the same location as the existing sign, surrounded by a protective island planter. Orientation to the freeway traffic will be similar to existing. 4. Note that the new sign Will be 19-ft. less in height than what now exists and 60 sq. ft. less each face in sign area. • Summary: In summary, the City of Tigard' s consideration in regards a "Sign Exception approval is requested to improve a sign situation that now exists at the existing Texaco Service Center. The Request is based on the following facts: A. The best interests of the Community and property Owner will be better served by approving the request as submitted. The sign replacement proposal will be an improvement and upgrading to both the Community and surrounding neighborhood. the Texaco"Service Center b allo��allowing integrated tat B. general clean-up of signa° e will be evident y '� g an n-�egrated ,. standing identification/price information sign at the northwest corner as proposed. O . r replacement ft, per will of the Freeway Orientated Sign repla " p eliminate existing area by 60� sq. p face and r 3 y . a i L • g signs that will be consolidated into a single price information sign at the northwest corner of the site. aesthetic quality of the proposed free-standing signs will D. The aesth g be compatible with and enhance .the surrounding area. If there are any uestions in regards to the proposal in the y q g Aeneral or the at` e Inc. ,g please let me know. general on behalf of T taco attached d.i"a�v s r they looking for ward: to your "Sign Exception" consideration e derationand doing g their p art of improving the aesthetis q ualities o the city of Tigard. Sincerely, (0c-PN Richard . Webb, Architect for Texaco : Inc. 9r • . •., , . ■ " . , iit ) 1 , 0 41 ,. . ( „. c4 , < 5 , ... ,-,-, - , .., z 9, m L456-,.)I\JJ.11) , \ il ■ (1) .... • . 0 \\ * 1 , .a ' . . • • 4” ‘CP . CO 4.0'141 \ ' a. U ... a.. 0 \c,',.; tpcii 9 „II..... ,,,,,(, till31)0‘,0 . <r --;,-///40.' ,e- 0 V) ,--- r1”.A ...... ■ 44:-4/1 . i„i'l 14 ti . , 0 1 .41 i \ 1• , N . . . , aft.. Cr'i 0 0\ i de , LI CZ . ■ ..,„■■■ '. ' ' . ti.41 if . • .., ,....' .‘ . .. ,• . ..., .... cs) ,... ,.., ,,---;•141' . . .*.... . -,.:. 1 ..,...„, ,..... _. , . q,•,..if, arr.'. • i , \, ---1-•,.. ‘...,,, - ...---' rv.,... , ." , . ,, ,.....- ........-- i. 1 ..--- 1..., .........9 „...... . . . 1 ,• _........el i. ..." I\ G, ..e....... ......-6 c^,.....--* , • , i'-'..1.4 1/49, 0 , :Pr — 4111, e • tit,1 \ i • 't 9 l • 1 • . . ' I C......) N . (POit."---.'--. '. "' 44 1 . 4 .■'''' t•-•.:, ...' \ . I 1 • • ..,•,. ,.. ,•,•,,■ye$0. -:, A..., • ... • i • "...-4.,- .1 ....."'''' • I , 45'50 `4 . '----"` g'595'4% ----,... t‘,‹; ........„ ic . __ •1. - i U A 2,7'-:--,1--■itir) . 0 1 . Cri"-;-.7., oi its•. I • ':•••;.... .0 CZ/ 41,)) -- — -- ....":, • . ,, r-1 NI tit c '5.4. \ t\t..... k 1, . . I. .:7-t•11: , r ,,,„„, 0 t4'it3" I•• 46. 1.....ii r',i,, S69......10.....-----' -' C").1 4(''9L1-9' j;:186,rt.52:kto 44 a 9,ii 32,t.,9,0 ,,. .1..-. ...,,,... . ....il..Z.... ......, •-• '41'....1"44 -... ci ., .... (-9 ,...-. ., \ 1-•(Z i , 4 0 i ' i ' . .:...L.‘. % 2 U t C2:1 1 0 0 ,.I \ * * ,:t tv, ti•b(.0 .....„ .._,, , I . . I ■_ 004 \..,, • , , l ••" '.. . ....s.:•4 ....,, i :IA i ' .-.-.. t..) . \ , ... --- tr, 11) • -'%--.... 0 co to Ni r' 0 -:-.,... 1 ' , . t .....„,...., , 4 . .= , ' , it 4-i--t- . \b,.... on441,.6....W....0....■•■■•••■•.A.... 1 I i ■ .1. '.. "4„.. . " 1 , In.A it ,• (,) ,'.....--.'.. ). 4,,. ..0.,,,, i,ti.,,,,,,.,...Pilo ,4;04,p.i .-;cml.13,..".,, . ,ist ,.-W.07art,ii.'4;',Ofi,;•.'0,{11-,?4,,-0. 401„,,,/, .. •/ .i.' fir,,A„4 (0 f ...,....., a . „ k cilioi Plot P I a: .. , , flu rummt=rassimipmento . • , . . . , • • . I • . ' • ett * lesel • t )b4 ow441:0•%.4gAticut..1,..- o • • 4 ji •. •4D • TEXACO Niw• • Olt • • • Otteiltiti StiPet Unleaded , 1 , ID • • • gir EX. • • zehlitOtsiVitps4 154C„,.14 tki:ttitx. .. • :.• y .4, • • . . . . • . , ,, , ,„ .,t.• ' . ' . ••••••••=1...f■ .• . , . , . . . . . . . . . , ... , . .r ,• ., t 1 1, ••'r • c , 1 t! .rr . ., Nt., ,. ,. . . l . r,r • ‘s‘ '''' . V W 44. 4tizplit•4 A , 17 igl&I.-1# ,;.,. . . , . 1,..• , . lr • ., , . .. , ,. ., . ,• . . . .. , . , • . . . '1. . . . ...L.............. . • . . . ( .. --• . . le ... .:,', • .4,-4: 1 . . . (SP „,. 4(1/ .L............j............4. ., .• 44 • ,• , .„ . :\, ft .worm. • ,. ,-.\ 7 . 15 Cl I 1 .. .. . --ti. „ , ...1.--...............................--1‘,...... . ., -4,4.0••••.4-4........,....,••••..4...,•.,1,4•4,4.,1.,•.„,, 0 •• . . .i . . , . •4 : • , .. '1"\tt x •4 , .4 .. . .. ... 'II I . . •. . . . -”" ''' '•. • 1: CO .... A ° ■ r i • i M 7,, , i. I ... ., e "ct ''.■..T , • . , L , .. . ..i. a . . . , . . . .•, ; —4 161-1 ..... 1.... "' ...... l‘'t 1.,.. • 4 ..:' ,. ..' .: 4 #1, • ,. . i . r................,. . , . , . , , I' 8 .. . , . . f•I'l \i'l . .' i 61.1 b, . • .. , . CITY TIGARD D ate A *1 17 84 No. VX"'"4 .4 -iGN PERMIT APPLICATION OF I 9 19 The applicant hereby applies for a permit for the work indicated or as shown in the accompanying plans and specifications. SIGN LOCATION ADDRESS: Texaco Service Center @ 11834 S.W. Pacific Highway APPLICANT: Owner Lessee X Authorized Representative Richard L. Webb, Archt. NAME/COMPANY Texaco Inc. - 150N.W. St. Helens Rd. — Tel,_22,L,3,57....5._ • , . PROPOSED SIGN: Freestanding X Wall Projecting Other SIGN DIMENSIONS _( e Plans) AREA 811.(19 HEIGHT 24'8,c WALL AREA PROPERTY FRONTAGE 2°0 COST 12,000 02oNING DISTRICT "C-Git.LUMINATION s • • MATERIAL — (See 13.1a7/.."ri7g177— COLOR • COPY • EXISTING SIGNS: Freestanding (2) Wall (2) Projecting Other SetlIc.binsittin-bagl COMMENTS: reepclenatceernre. TiexL112acorisel,vnic 11:-.LPISee°1921attacha-edthe naTa717v-e---& d-F-----.7----*awa.ngs or explaI6WofeproieCt. All sign permits must be accompanied by a scale drawing and plot . plan. If work authorized under a sign permit has not been completed Within ninety days after the issuance of the permits the permit shall PLANNING DEPARTMENT bibie n and Permit Fee • • ceceijtip Q99-43Z 50proved Applicant's Signature Renewal Date Address Telephone Note : A Sign Exception Request is being applied for with this Sign Permit Application. • • e ,t7/ 7r/ vor,frirp-197-~' 4710d 1/ ',/ 4.7 7; /7/ ormummumorm....ormaarrimb. ( C1/_ _2" ' -7-11/777('> (-)Y f7/2 * ,firr#1'731'e""ie 9 /)p cor-selg, (TAY ,,47 g7-4,34 u_V? [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] r. Mgc ?ICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATT( 1. NPO No. t5 CPO No. • } 2. CITY DEPARTMENTS Pi Building Inspector IN.,6 Engineer.ing-Randy d/ Engineering-Frank/John Parks and Recreation City Recorder Other 3. SPEC A3 DISTRICTS - - Tualatin R.F.P.D. School Dist. No. 48 (Beaverton) Washington Co. F.D. No, 1 School Dist. No. 233 (Tigard) ? , Tigard W.D. Other Metzger W.D. 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS City Council Boundary Commission Planning Commission METRO Planning Department Other _ Wash.CO. Land Use & Trans.Dept. ' f 5. STATE AGENCIES Aeronautics Div. (ODOT) DOGAMI i Engineer Division of State Lands Board of Health Commerce Dept. = M.H. Park �. Highway Div. - Terry Flink Fish & Wildlife (ODOT)v.ecrea.s ar Pk & R Di (OD , . , �` LCDC °. Subdivision Supervisor PUC • Dept. of Energy Fire Marshall Dept: of Environ. Quality ,, Other ti. FEDERAL AGENCIES • Corps of Engineers Other Poet Office 74 SPECIAL AGENCIES General Telephone p' ortland General Electric Pacific Northwest Bell b t er Northwest Natural Gas . mEOUgstg POR COMMENT SENT ,. (Ksb»pm/6356P) • e [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]