Loading...
Permit ,, CITY OF TIGARD MASTER PERMIT ' - 2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Permit #: MST2011 -00116 TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard OR 97223 503.718.2439 Date Issued: 07!19/2011 Parcel: 2S104CCO5300 Jurisdiction: Tigard Site address: 13609 SW ESSEX DR Subdivision: Lot: Project: DOLAN Project Description: DeCk. BUILDING Floor Areas Required Setbacks Required Stories: 0 Bedrooms: 0 First: 0 sf Basement: 0 sf Left: 5 Parking Spaces: 0 Height: 0 Bathrooms: 0 Second: 0 sf Garage: 0 sf Front: 0 Smoke Dwelling Units: 0 Third: 0 sf Right: 5 Detectors: No Total: 0 sf Value: $5,850.00 Rear: 0 PLUMBING Sinks: 0 Water Closets: 0 Washing Mach: 0 Laundry Trays: 0 Rain Drain: 0 Urinals: 0 Lavatories: 0 Dishwashers: 0 Floor Drains: 0 Sewer Lines: 0 SF Rain Storm Sewer: 0 Drains: 0 Tubs /Showers: 0 Garbage Disp: 0 Water Heaters: 0 Water Lines: 0 Catch Basins: 0 Bckflw Prevntr: 0 Footing Drain: 0 Ice Maker: 0 Hose Bib: 0 Backwater Value: 0 Other Fixtures: 0 Drywell- Trench Drain: 0 Other Fixture Units: MECHANICAL Fuel Types Air Conditioning: N Vent Fans: 0 Clothes Dryers: 0 Heat Pump: N Hoods: 0 Other Units: 0 Furn <100K: 0 Vents: 0 Woodstoves: 0 Gas Outlets: 0 Furn > =100K: 0 ELECTRICAL Residential Unit Service Feeder Temp Srvc /Feeders Branch Circuits 1000 sf or less: 0 0 -200 amp: 0 0 -200 amp: 0 W/ Svc or Fdr: 0 Ea add'I 500 sf: 0 201 -400 amp: 0 201 -400 amp: 0 W/O Svc/Fdr: 0 Mfd Home /Feeder /Svc: 0 401 -600 amp: 0 401 -600 amp: 0 601 -1000 amp: 0 601 +amp- 1000v: 0 1000 +amp /volt: 0 ELECTRICAL - RESTRICTED ENERGY SF Residential ' Audio & Stereo: N HVAC: N Security Alarm: N Vaccuum System: N Garage Opener: N All Other: N Other Description: Ecompasing: N BUILDING INFO Class of Work: Type of Use: Type of Constr: Occupancy Group: Square Feet: ALT SF VB R -3 0 Owner: Contractor: DOLAN, ANTHONY F & MARLYS M NORTHWEST DECKING & RAIL LLC Required Items and Reports (Conditions) 13609 SW ESSEX DR 726 S PACIFIC ST TIGARD, OR 97223 97132 PHONE: PHONE: 503 -407 -8929 FAX: Total Fees: $297.98 This permit is issued subject to the regulations contained in the Tigard Municipal Code, State of OR. Specialty Codes and all other applicable law. All work will be done in accordance with approved plans. This permit will expire if work is not started within 180 days of issuance, or if work is suspended for more the 180 days. ATTENTION: Oregon law requires you to follow the rules adopted by the Oregon Utility N• " ation Center. Those rules are set forth in OAR 952 - 001 -0010 through a , r' 52- 001 -0090. You m- : • - a copy •ii(ll ti.• - '• • to -OUNC by ca ling 5 or 1 : r • 32.2344. Issued By: _ ���. � ' ' -.. �5 Permittee Signature: \ �► i Call 503: 9. �,�•�.�•p 00 a.m. for the next available inspection date. This permit card shall be kep a conspicuous place on the job site until completion of the project. Approved plans are required on the job site at the time of each inspection. Building Permit Application 4- ii'$P --iotQ ' 't t-- �s FOR OFFICE USE ONLY City of Tigard `� DateB . 7 ; f, Permit No.: `. /o /-. r q 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97 •4 Phone: 503.718.2439 Fax: 503. r�Q\ Date B Rev : iew 1��Om Other Permit: T f GA R D Inspection Line: 503.639.4175 to9 \ y Date Ready/BV: Juris: 0 See Page 2 for Internet: www.tigard or.gov 0. r R,o A Notified/Method: _ � Supplemental Information TYPE OF WORK \ ( \ �CI � REQUIRED DATA: 1- AND 2- FAMILY DWELLING ❑ New construction ❑ D $41,OtiKn Permit fees* are based on the value of the work performed. y � DD Indicate the value (rowded to the nearest dollar) of all Addition/alteration /replacement ❑ Other: equipment, materials, labor, overhead, and the profit for the CATEGORY OF CONSTRUCTION work indicated on this application. fg 1- and 2- family dwelling ❑ Commercial /industrial Valuation: $ ❑ Accessory building El Multi-family Number of bedrooms: ❑ Master builder ❑ Other: Number of bathrooms: JOB SITE INFORMATION AND LOCATION Total number of floors: Job, site address: 1 3(00(1 Su° GSs -----✓ New dwelling area: square feet City /State /ZIP: —y k. c -c 1 012-- 9 -2Z 3 Garage /carport area: square feet Suite/bldg. /apt. no.: Project name: Covered porch area square feet Cross street/directions to job site: Deck area: '312, square feet Other structure area: square feet REQUIRED DATA: COMMERCIAL - USE CHECKLIST Subdivision: Lot no.: Permit fees* are based on the value of the work performed. Tax map /parcel no.: Indicate the value (rowded to the nearest dollar) of all equipment, materials, labor, overhead, and the profit for the DESCRIPTION OF WORK work indicated on this application. ,� \ 1 _ Valuation: $ 5 j g s Jv IC Q r h Existing building area square feet New building area: square feet ® PROPERTY OWNER ❑ TENANT Number of stories: Namc: -- bo\ciL an Type of construction: Address: 13 pct S Li3 is x ' Occupancy groups: City/State/ZIP:- t D f - q- 22 Existing: Phone: ( ) Fax: ( ) New: JA APPLICANT ❑ CONTACT PERSON NOTICE Business name: �Dv4l,t Attu 1 } CC�I�I ,,,,_,J Vz \ All contractors and subcontractors are required to be Contact name: `� licensed with the Oregon Construction Contractors Board -1 a F' f � ! ^� 5- under ORS 701 and may be required to be licensed in the Address: 3- 5 w, c , ; ,..c.-, L S jurisdiction in which work is being performed. If the City /State /ZIP: kCW o c I3Z applicant is exempt from licensing, the following reasons J apply: Phone: (503) t-tU�- —P�9 2ei Fax:: ( ) E - mail: -h- ;c1L10 nwdle04;1 a.� y-ml i , c..o✓N CONTRACTOR BUILDING PERMIT FEES* (Please refer to fee schedule) Business name: GS 0. \t Ca ,, -� Q Permit fee: Address: State surcharge (12% of permit fee): City /State /ZIP: FLS plan review (40% ofpermit fee): Phone: ( ) Fax: ( ) (Due upon application.) CCB lic.: i tj 9 257 C /07 Total permit fees: Authorized signature: Amount received: / 0'1 >1 This permit application expires if a permi is not obtained Print name: �G 6[ - ∎< Date: 7' 2_0 tt within 180 days after it has been accepted as complete. * Fee methodology set by Tri- County Building Industry Service Board. I:\Building\Permils \FPS- PermitApp.doc 02/01/2011 440- 4613T(11/02/COM/WEB) City of Tigard: Fire Protection Permit Checklist Page 2 - Supplemental Information Describe work to be done: 1.) ❑ New 2.) Modification to sprinkler heads only: ❑ Addition ❑ 1 -10 heads: No plan review required. ❑ Alteration ❑ 11+ heads: Plan review required. ❑ Repair Number of sprinkler heads: Additional description of work: Type of System (Complete A, B, C or D as applicable): A.) Commercial Sprinkler ❑ Wet ❑ Dry Additional Standpipes Information: Hazard Group Density Design Area K. Factor Sprinkler Project Valuation: $ B.) Type I - Hood Fire Suppression System Hood Project Valuation: $ C.) Fire Alarm Submittal shall Battery Calculations El Yes include: Individual Component ❑ Yes Cut Sheets Fire Alarm Project Valuation: $ D.) Residential Sprinkler (Stand Alone System) Square Footage: Permit Fee: 0 to 2,000 $198.75 2,001 to 3,600 $246.45 3,601 to 7,200 $310.05 7,201 and greater $404.39 Sprinkler Project Square Footage: sq. ft. Fire Protection Permit Fees Project valuation subtotal (see A, B & C above): $ Permit fee based on project valuation (see fee schedule): $ Permit fee based on square footage (see D above): $ State Surcharge (12% of permit fee): $ FLS Plan Review (40% of permit fee): $ TOTAL: $ Plan review requires a completed application and three (3) sets of plans at submittal. Plan review fees are required at submittal. I: \Building \Permits \FPS- PermitApp.doc 02/01/2011 2 Building Division Development Code Provision Review TIGARD Residential Projects Building Permit No: (11SJ -got- on 11 CP CWS Service Provider Letter Received: Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ 62 t.5 nkH,"{, 1 7/4 e.7) Routed Plans: Original Plan Submittal Date: 7/ /I/ ' 1st Revision Submittal Date: ❑ Site Plan Only 2nd Revision Submittal Date: ❑ Site Plan Only To the Applicant: Each review type must be approved. If the plan is not approved, please revise and resubmit three (3) copies to the Building Division. Only checked (/) items are approved. Items not approved and those listed in the notes must be revised prior to re- submittal. For questions please contact the appropriate staff person(s) listed above each section. Staff: please check items along left only if approved. Planning Review (contact at 503-718- dif' or j @tigard- or.gov) Land Use Case No. Name L-- ❑ Zoning 0 P---b ❑ Setbacks: ,' ll Front ('- Rear 15 Side Street Side 10 Garage r ❑ Maximum Building Height 33 Actual Building Height laVisual Clearance ❑ Easements /1 n ❑ Sensitive Lands Type: It thS ��k2f(P'i�C1X e Nr irSz . LA s SeC S , \ r1..st 4. rt J a Notes: Original Plan: Approved ILJ Not Approved ❑ Date: - 7l( 3 f Revision 1: Approved ❑ Not Approved ❑ Date: Revision 2: Approved ❑ Not Approved ❑ Date: Engineering Review (contact Mike White at 503 - 718 -2464 or MikeW @tigard- or.gov) Actual Slope: 4 5 Notes: Original Plan: Approved 14, Not Approved ❑ Date: — 7 15 l Revision 1: Approved ❑ Not Approved ❑ Date: Revision 2: Approved ❑ Not Approved ❑ Date: (Review Continues on Page 2) Page 1 of 2 City Arborist Review (contact Todd Prager at 503 - 718 -2700 or todd @tigard - or.gov) ❑ Street Trees ❑ Protected Trees Notes: Original Plan: Approved ❑ Not Approved ❑ Date: Revision 1: Approved ❑ Not Approved ❑ Date: Revision 2: Approved ❑ Not Approved ❑ Date: Permit Coordinator Review (contact Albert Shields at 503 - 718 -2426 or albert @tigard - or.gov) ❑ Conditions of Approval Prior to Issuance of Building Permit Notes : Original Plan: Date Sent to Applicant: Revision 1: Date Sent to Applicant Revision 2: Date Sent to Applicant Okay to Issue Permit: Yes ❑ No ❑ Date Routed to Building: Page 2 of 2 I-1 I (o /���� - 11) IgTIT Clean Water Services File Number JUL 14 2011 CleanWater Services (d 00 Sig 2- nsitive Area Pre - Screening Site Assessment fa i i cake -,› 2. Property Information (axe pie 1S234AB01400) 3. Owner information Tax lot ID(s): 2 5 C 0 `j Cc- 0 Name: Dolan Company: Address: 13609 sw essex dr Site Address: 13609 sw essex dr City, State, Zip: tigard, or 97224 City, State, Zip: tigard, or 97224 Phone/Fax: Nearest Cross Street: E -Mail: 4. Development Activity (check all that apply) 5. Applicant Information IA Addition to Single Family Residence (rooms, deck, garage) Name: Patrick Davis ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Minor Land Partition Company: Northwest Decking and Rail ❑ Residential Condominium ❑ Commercial Condominium Address: 726 s. Pacific St. ❑ Residential Subdivision ❑ Commercial Subdivision Li Single Lot Commercial ❑ Multi Lot Commercial City, State, Zip: Newberg, OR 97132 Other Phone/Fax: Of 503 - 407 -8929 F# 503- 650 -4825 E- Mail: patrick@nwdeckingandrail.com 6. Will the project involve any off -site work? ❑ Yes a No ❑ Unknown Location and description of off -site work 7. Additional comments or information that may be needed to understand your project This application does NOT replace Grading and Erosion Control Permits, Connection Permits, Building Permits, Site Development Permits, DEQ 1200•C Permit or other permits as Issued by the Department of Environmental Quality, Department of State Lands and/or Department of the Army COE. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local, state, and federal law By signing this form, the Owner or Owner's authorized agent or representative, acknowledges and agrees that employees of Clean Water Services have authority to enter the project site at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting project site conditions and gathering information related to the project site. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this document, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, this information is true, complete, and accurate. Print/Type Name Patrick Davis Print/Type Title Owner ONLINE SUBMITTAL Date 7/13/2011 FOR DISTRICT USE ONLY ❑ Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200' of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE ASSESSMENT PRiOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties, a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. ❑ Based on review of the submitted materials and best available information Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200' of the site. This Sensitive Area Pre - Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered. This document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 07 -20, Section 3.02.1. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local, State, and federal law. ❑ Based on review of the submitted materials and best available information the above referenced project will not significantly impact the existing or potentially sensitive area(s) found near the site. This Sensitive Area Pre - Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect additional water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered. This document wit serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 07 -20, Section 3.02.1. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local, state and federal law, ❑ his Service Provider Letter Is not valid unless CWS approved site plan(s) are attached. l The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development or the lot was platted after 9/9/95 ORS 92.040(2). NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVID R LETTER IS R SUIRED, Reviewed by Date 7 //if A l 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsbo;o, Oregon '97123. • ?none: (503) 661- 51.00: • Fax. (303) 81 -4'39 • s: ^.P.u:cleamvaterservices.org q' qqq * C\1 93 Site Poo p �� 1% /°\\ ,,0_1%/°\\ GIB O ,001 A toks GD Dolan Project ,C\ 13609 SW Essex Dr. ta` f �,� Tigard, OR 97223 � <o H / # l5' / `� Tax ID# 2S104CCO5300 Setback ' \ Zoning: R — 7 \\\ Scale: 1" = 20' f \ ` Contractor: ,� \\ \ Northwest Decking and Rail LLC \\ Setback 726 S. Pacific St, ''\ i Newberg, OR 97132 `\ � J 503-407-8929 \ 1Deck ``,• .6) patrick ©nwdeckingandrail.com ` \` , \ ` G \�, \ \ OF �'IG AIZD \Setback ` , Approved .. .. .... N.N.N [ �l 1' 5 (E ) G a rage Conditionally Approved .....NH [ ] 6 ', See Letter to: Follow ..H.N. [ ] H pN.. 6, ` Permit Num s sc. _4 ' �. (E)House Ad ., • . AAA ja'uh�_ (E)Driveway By A %• Date: fi r . f OFFICE COPY N Approved plans j 5 � . shall be on job site. • \\,/ Setb ck co Footing Schedule: F -2 Continuous = 12 "x18 "x26' F -4 = 18 "x18" Depth = 18" min. Post Schedule: P -1 = 4x4 All Posts are PT #2 H.F. • e s r DA-Hc<0 All post to beam connection w /(2) AC4Z Beam I ch d : 1 0 \\A/ S e ue 4x12 PT #2 H.F. Joist Schedule: 2x8 PT #2 H.F. © 16" O.C. X Brace: X = 2x6 w /(2) 5" LedgerLok / Existing House Lag Screws (ICC# ESR -1078) / Lags per attachment / / / / / / / / / / / / /// / / / / / / /AI/M / / / /L► Decking Material: 5 /4x6 PVC < Handrail: as req'd, 36" high Existing Stairs and Landing 17' B To P.L. / 5' / 26' / —6" P -1 P -1 P -1 P -1 \ \ \ E F -2 Continuous 3 F -2 Continuous 3 F -2 Continuous ?; 9' -6" 4x12 4x12 4x12 4x12 12' 2x8 PT 0 16" OC P -1 Ps-1 P-1 P-1 A > \ F X F X F X F \\__// 2' �/ \ /-2' / 7'-4" / 7'-4" / 7'-4" / 2'—// T B1 726 S. 1 /4" Dolan Project NORTHWEST DECKING Newber Pacific St. A RAIL LLC g OR 97132 13609 SW Essex Dr. www.nwdeckingandrail.com scale Tigard, OR 97223 503.407.8929 patrick @nwdeckingandrail.com Footing Schedule: F -2 Continuous = 12 "x18 "x26' F -4 = 18"x18" Depth = 18" min. Post Schedule: P -1 = 4x4 All Posts are PT #2 H.F. All post to beam connection w /(2) AC4Z Beam Schedule: 4x12 PT #2 H.F. Joist Schedule: 2x8 PT #2 H.F. 0 16" O.C. X Brace: X = 2x6 w /(2) 5" LedgerLok Lag Screws (ICC# ESR -1078) Lags per attachment Decking Material: 5 /4x6 PVC Handrail: as req'd, 36" high •ear F r - It 26' / Handrail Omitted for Clarity: See Attached Details 2x8 PT ® 16" OC \ (2) AC4 4x12 (2) AC4 4x12 (2) AC4 + 4x12 (2) AC4 4x12 X X X 9' P -1 P -1 PBS44A PBS44A PBS44A PBS F -4 18" min. F -4 18" min. F -4 18" min. F -4 18" min. -/18 "/- —/18 "/- -/18 "/- —/18 "/— /-2' / 7' -4" / 7' -4" / 7' -4" / 2'-/ A > < A 1 726 S. 1 /4" Dolan Project NORTHWEST DECKING Newbe Pacific St. rg OR 97132 13609 SW Essex Dr. AND RAIL LLC www.nwdeckingandrail.com scale Tigard, OR 97223 503.407.8929 patrick @nwdeckingandrail.com Footing Schedule: F -2 Continuous = 12 "x 18 "x26' F -4 = 18"x18" Depth = 18" min. • Post Schedule: P -1 = 4x4 All Posts are PT #2 H.F. All post to beam connection w /(2) AC4Z Beam Schedule: 4x12 PT #2 H.F. Joist Schedule: 2x8 PT #2 H.F. 16" O.C. X Brace: X = 2x6 w /(2) 5" LedgerLok Lag Screws (ICC# ESR -1078) Lags per attachment Decking Material: 5 /ax6 PVC Handrail: as req'd, 36" high R • r Side Voc*,vv Existing Stairs • and Landing Handrail Omitted for Clarity: See Attached Details 2x8 PT 0 16" OC PBS44A i 6, 4x12 min. 18" (2) A I y F-2 X —Brace 9' PBS44A I` v min. 18" F -4 -/18 "/— 6" // 9' -6" / 2'-7 • , 12' / < B1 I /4 " D olan P ro j ect NORTHWEST DECKING 726 S. Pacific St. Newberg, OR 97132 13609 SW Essex Dr. AND RAIL. LLC www.nwdeckingandrail.com scale Tigard, OR 97223 503.407.8929 patrick @nwdeckingandrail.com Talbott 7 SE 97 Avenue f�SSOCIateS Portland, OR 97216 -2427 (503) 256-3852 Incorporated FAX (503) 252 -7806 Consulting Engineers www.talbonassociates.com January 28, 2011 TAI File 3016401.0001 Sapa Profiles, Inc. 7320 N.E. 55th Ave. Portland, OR 97218 Attn: Alyssa Stibolt, Fabricated Components Re: Analysis of Residential Guardrail System Dear Ms. Stibolt: Talbott Associates, Inc. (TA1) is pleased to submit this report which summarizes the results of the analysis of Sapa's Residential Guardrail System. Michael Hagerty, senior engineer for TAI, served as the Primary engineer for analyzing the Residential Guardrail system. John A. Talbott, P.E., of TAI was the Technical Reviewing engineer for the analysis. Previous reports for the Residential Guardrail System prepared by us include one for Sapa dated September 5, 2008 and December 10, 2004 as well as one for the Alumarail division of Anodizing, Inc. dated August 29, 1997. CONCLUSIONS 1. The analysis demonstrates that the Sapa Profiles Residential guardrail system meets the requirements of the 2009 International Building Code and 2009 International Residential Code for systems used in one- and two- family dwellings as defined in those codes. 2. The analysis utilizes allowable stress design (working stress design). The analysis provides a suitably conservative demonstration that the residential guardrail system meets the applicable code requirements. 3. Because of the great variability of designs and building materials used in residences, the attachment of the railing system to the deck or balcony as well as the deck or balcony structural framing supporting the guardrail system and the structural elements for the building containing the deck or balcony are not part of this analysis. • 1 • Sapa Profiles, Inc. Page 2 of 3 January 28, 2011 3016401.0001 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION The Sapa Residential Railing System consists of extruded 6005 -T5 aluminum alloy framing members (posts and rails) with aluminum balustrades (for which Sapa uses the term "pickets ") or glass balustrade panels or stainless steel cables. (Balustrade material is designated "infill" in the industry.) Aluminum members are connected together with cadmium - coated Torx Drive flat head steel screws and coated with a pigmented enamel finish for durability and aesthetics or Type 304 SH stainless steel flat head screws. The railing systems are typically sold for use as exterior residential guardrails on balconies, decks, porches, stairs and similar installations where railings are required or desired. These systems are designed to be partially field- fabricated using stock components. The frames are designed to attach the systems to structures composed of wood and other components. The screw and lag connectors used to connect to the supporting structures should be either hot dipped galvanized steel or stainless steel. The top railing for these systems is offered in rounded cross - sectional configurations (Series 100 and 999) or flat configurations (Series 375 and 200). Railing sections are fabricated for 5 foot spacing for glass infill systems between vertical posts or 6 foot spacing for other infill. These sections are attached to a short railing block which in turn is attached to the vertical posts. The posts are attached to mounting brackets which are attached to the deck or balcony framing. STANDARDS Sapa products are marketed in the western United States. Therefore, it was determined that standard used for analysis should be the minimum loads specified in the 2009 International Building Code (IBC) and the 2009 International Residential Code (IRC), which are the basis for state building codes in the Western United States. Guardrails and handrails are required by both codes where safety from falling is involved in the design and construction of buildings. A subset of the load provisions of the IBC are incorporated into the IRC, which is widely used by state building code organizations as the minimum standard for construction of one- and two - family dwellings as well as townhouses. It was determined that the loading provisions of Table R301.5 of the IRC applied to the Sapa residential railing systems. A copy of the table is attached. Railing Systems are required to withstand a specified loading of 200 pounds applied in any direction to the top rail of guardrails. This load is not required to be concurrent with any other loads. The terminology of the IBC "be designed to resist" was interpreted to mean that the railing system being analyzed would resist the forces applied without any material yielding (breaking Sapa Profiles, Inc. Page 3 of 3 January 28, 2011 3016401.0001 or permanent bending). Because railing system members are not considered to be structural components of a building, the material deflection limit requirements do not apply; however, it is obvious that a railing system must resist minimum loads without plastic a deformation that would compromise safety. As a result, the analysis utilizes allowable stress design (working stress design). The analysis provides a suitably conservative demonstration that the residential guardrail system meets the applicable code requirements. ANALYSIS RESULTS The analysis is elaborated as follows: • Calculations .Pages I -- 24 • Section Properties Pages Si — S28 • Code References Page R1 We are pleased to submit this report. Please call us if questions arise. Respectfully submitted, TALBOTT ASSOCIATES, INC. • c aof ESSIpi; c ,. . Y _,, , ,-' 4.- \\V.'. p,,,. TACK, (' 1 $ A. r44 F� . at{ccAW /2• c v - x ... 1541 7 OREGON r . . F 4 i i y 14. 4 Q` .2 R fi744� . +9 r h , P . e Civ 1L � s � cL l . H G F o 'ct ,c . \ 4 n �A11 E04 • '�C ' - 6 FFf � ION AL ocrints G /3b /20/ z L$! l �x,� s J� ;, rz�;: 44 4 ti- � 61 N �r� dp L. K ,-- es /z/.s-/2'04 ct 1498 1, � .. Michael R. Hagerty, P. E. John A. Talbott P. E. ✓ OF ��� Talbott, Primary Engineer Reviewing Engineer 6'4 R. 7A\ ,E, a /s.J2or� • ' , • % - 1 \` % • • I SERIES 200 PROFILES 2 a /e 2 1/r 1 3/04---1 r H ... 4_ E. . 1. h.7111_4 . ‘ P M M i( a I KLT 2 1/2" • ..... • • „'► 0 F0 SERIES zoo SODOM RAIL � 2 1/2" .. * „.._ UOFIT CQMMERML P0ST FOR 42" HIGH RAIUNO 1--13/8"--1 1--13/8"--1 • 1 1/8" b Alli . 1.3. • L. . . • _L_. j L La E • (IF APPLIOAOLF� K BRA A CKET F OR a M • 3 1/2" - -a /4 "� 1 1/16" r tc...Hr71 o0TT0ld RAIL I - \...- . - 4,...„, . . PICKET' SPACER Plow AoER 4. . • .../ • • . . RE5 POST ^" SERIES 200 PCP RAIL i . • • • • a ..7 _j 8 X .78 SS PH SMS END CAP (6062 ALUM) • . TOP RAIL (6003-T6 ALUM) /� II I TOP RAIL REFILL (6005-T8 ALUM) • . Q X10 X .76 SS PH SMS /� I / TOP RAIL PICKET :% C • ' / a SPACER (BOOB TS ALUM) ' � �O POST 06008 -78 ALUM) P i:::11 fl~ f // P '. r • PICKET (8008 -78 ALUM) c 111 X10 X .78.88 PH SMS • ti RAIL CONNECTING • • BLOCK (8008 -T6 ALUM) • I') 6X8%1 /4" ®38" RAIL BXBX8" ET 42" RAIL 4 III III 8ASE (6008-T6 ALUM) 1/44 X 2 SAE GR.B PH SD TOR% ((4X) ® 38" RAILING • . ..;.- „.,.:- . 14 BOTTOM RAIL PICKET T «/ I • SPACER (80013-T8 ALUM) / /' /f ` BOTTOM RAIL (8006 -T5 ALUM) #10 X 1.5 SS PH SMS . 4101 . . .: • lei . SERIES 200 PICKET RAIL'NG • 1 , i ■ ____ , . . . . • . _. . • _ . • . ••••...... • . ... • . • . • • • • . . . • i . - ' • • . . . . . . . . • • ; . . I ' • • . • . • • . . . , . . . • • • . • ' . • . , . . .. . • • • . . • . • ' . . . . • ' . • . ' ' • • • . • •. . ' • '' • • . .• , . .•. 1 • . • ' . . • . • • . . • • • . . . . • • • . ' , . • " , . . • . . .• • . . . . . ' ' , . . . . . • . . . . • . . , l I • . : • • . . • . . : • .. . • • ; • • . . • • OHO OVUM • : • • • • 10P • RAII. • • • • • . • • • ; • . •_,,,, . . • • . . I • • . • . • • . -- , • .. . . • • - . 4:14.;. . . • , • •14A • • ' • 110 X Ve • ' .. , I • :•,-,..„ . •• ' , N,;cill• , • • • • • PH lEX ' • • •• .• . • . :C..'1,,illii• . , . . . , • , I • '-:,,•••••••...._ ''',. .. .:•A .: I • no SEMO • •••••,' . -.‹.?:0!"" •,•-') .. ; ":'-',,,---•?-- . . TOP Rsa. . ,., .,,,,,: . '-''''-'•'-''''-'• 4 1"i'' . •1 . ... -:::''''.;:''' . i ,, ,,,,, , ,.p--/,•, , i114' ,,,_•.,:„...:_:;.,.„-- # ...›.... ----4: • , ,,.. . • • I . I '--•.- , '. •,, .-- , .:<.-=''',--., 1 , — 1. j •'' i .‹,•....alf• .... ,--- 0::.• - , .....„,,,, . . . H . • • -• ,..1 I ' . ' ..•'''...• . ,-"'" I NI, ...,.. \ • . . -0.,. ,,, -.. .•• I 1 I I ..... i . . . • . ' e . . -• 1 ''.. .. . • ',. a A • ..s•G . l . .., . I . . • ,. . . • 1 . . . .• . • , 1. w . .. . , /10 • • • . • .• P ar • . • • • . , • • . • ,TOP DAIL • I • . • ,t( • . , l• • , ' • i • *.* * il I • • . . ' • . . . III' 11 1 • * PON .. • I • • • • 10P RAIL • . • „ ... • • • I • • . • ISM . ' • I : . , . . . . . . . ' I • • . . I • . . • • .• .• .• • ' ' • • • • . . • • . . . • • • . . • • ' . i ' • • °TYPICAL TOP RAIL CONNECITEIN " • . • '. • , 1 °TYPICAL TOP RAIL CORNER CONNECTION • . • , r-it-o' • • • • • . 3 ■ . • • i. .. . . • • . . • • . . i . . . , • .. . . .. • . . . . • . . . . . ... • two am r,..2:.....y.iiti,.3.,,,,,,r,./,._ • . . . . 1 . I • ... . . . . . . . • . . . . . • TOP RA . IL ' • ..:11.• • • • • . . . . . • • • . . • I ,r.V,:":•• • • • • I . •• . • • • • • . • • - • ■ ....;::,-rf,;,,,,.... . . • . . • . . 1 . • • VIC' ENO CAP • • . . • . 4 i 'f•• •• ,1 • • • ' • . . ! . . . • • I • . . • •• .5 . • . • '. IliiiiIt` V0 • • • - • • . . . • • • • . • . %.,..../ PO X 3/4 . : . ..." ' i II . ''' ,',.." : • ' • . • . . . • i i • . • ' i A PH TElt"-' -` • a6 . . . • • • • . • . .. -•,. 1 1 0,. . . . • . . . tf'' .liip - • . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 END CAP DETAIL • - . • • . . . . • 3-...1...0 • . . • • • . • • • • . . . . • . • • • " '• , . . . • . . . . • • • • • • ' • • . . . .. . ." • . . , . . . . . .. • ' • .. . . . . . . ' . • • 1 • • . . . • • • . • . . . . . . ' I • . • • . . . ' ! . .• . • • • . ., • • • • I • • , . . . • • • I • . • . . • . • • • . . 1 . . . . . .. . : . . • • * .' • • ' . . . . ' •. • LP . . .. . • I• • . . • • . . • • . . , . . . . •• ..,N . . . u.I - . - , • . , " . . • . - . . . . . . !- • ' ' • • • • • . . . . . • • 16 x a /d° POST H TEK K. ' FILLER CAP l � X10 X 1 3/4". W • �.� PH tEK • PICKET C'' '('� '' ' . M D RAIL I I u I p10 ps /a ::'f III I TEK /1� ,�r P03T l ,..-'' . I ,••• • ir . • • • • r' l'� /11 i �, • • I SNAP CAP • ' x/10 X 1 3/4" . • TEK I ' , PICKET 200 SERIES , , • i BTM RAIL • TYPICAL BOTTOM RAIL CONNECTION DETAIL TYPICAL MID RAIL. C ONNECTION DETAIL • 3" 1' —o� 3 "m1' - 0 ° . . • • • • • • • . i • Q/1 • • N I • , • . • , ; . . p- Alci Ia IV • ; . . i } v t, c rW r � ,r ,,( .rC+�; e.,IL •••,:;',/ l, S.•• ••••',:.`"0; •°7 i LJ -.. {' ^5 V� t` � ,,'• �'' I I . . . D ) LEDGERLOK FASTENER I I . 1:1 • IIIIIIM11111114 . . IMF • • .200 SERIES PICKET '" 200 SORES PICKET - -_ –, /` x ___. _. P1 PIAN •VIEW — TYP BECK FRAMING 1 .1 -o' • • RAOJND SYSTEM --- )t --- RAILING SYSTEM W/ POST 35' MAX HEIOHT — R POST W ST / PO 30' MAX HEIGHT y R POST . AND B'-0' MAX C/L SPACING , . AND B' -0' LNk C/L SPACING ' 5X5 X 3 /13' ' BK5 X 3/8' RASE PULE BASE %ATE (4X) 5/10 X 2' , • • GRADE S CA SC RI.NCKK �PUTED STEEL SCREWS (4k) D' LEDGE MOCK 5' FASTENER 1 I Y - 4, I • in I— ' = • OECKWO— I DECKING SI_I T IW$ .. a ' , � N FF `S ure, • EE DOUG FIR 2X FRAMING I, • # ° ° 6 423P I DOUG FIR PERIMETER JOIST r ° ° , . • (4X) SIMPSON A35 • a D FIR 46Xj EA END. y • ° "I 44 9, 4 ' • • DOUG•FE2 ®(e BLOCKING 'All • ( ,l' C. L. 8 P N - WITH (4) 18d EA END Imo ° (2X) SINPSON A36 , lorAmmarolui . . 'THESE DRAWINGS ME ONLY . • 'REVIEWED AND STAMPED FOR • (SECTION AT FRAMING ®SECTIO AT . PERIMETER REo w I R R EM M ENS TO STnucruR�1 _ S2 1._G' $2 3' 1, -70 3' S Timm Nme4P. me A. pmapty W Sepe. M. owl cm net to be remodmeE In nny memo., mount ebb 01( eernJe.04 M Sum. Inc. CL), VI Al • ® ® — _ . Poste (DA, 07.08.11 .I ;LING ENGINEERING • , � ` �'� ® - -7-7-7-7_.. -7-7-7-7_ . — - _ I 13609 SW ESSEX DR, TIGARD, OR 97223 SAC NOTED • FABRICATED COMPONENTS 0 . __ CONTRCPoN . . w.o NO. . 7.320 NE 55TH AVE PORTLAND OR 87215 • (A011; PHONE -7090 • (SW) 2118 -0.528 ' I 8L1,., I ACTION I / 17 ,I PRECISION 'RAILING . ' _ I MO W: 'TIM .0 . 'I sum NO.' '.01 d 01 -t