Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
MMD1999-00002
• • NOTE TO THE FILE DATE: April 2, 2003 FROM: Patty Lunsford, Planning Secretary RE: Information Attached FILE REF.: MMD1999-00002 (All minor modification material is filed with the original land use approval file: SDR1993-00018) HISTORY: The City's Development Review Engineer asked that the attached material be filed with this land use file. This information pertains to an appeal of traffic impact fee assessment filed with the Washington County Hearings Officer. Appeal was Denied. h:\patty\masters\noteto.mst it • • it, CASEFILE: 99-581-APPEAL (TIF) ti .4 NOTICE OF DECISION OF v HEARINGS OFFICER APPLICANT: 44- \ Costco Wholesale —Tigard Q `La 7850 SW Dartmouth PROCEDURE TYPE: III Tigard, OR 97223 $d� CPO 4M APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: Ken Kroeger Tigard Mulvanny Architects 11820 Northrup Way E300 LAND USE DISTRICT: Bellevue, WA 98005 City.of Tigard OWNER: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Costco Wholesale Corp. Attn: Excise Tax Dept. III ASSESSOR MAP# 1S1 36 CD 999 Lake Drive Issaquah, WA 98027 TAX LOT# 2200 ADDRESS: 7850 SW Dartmouth, Tigard PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ACTION: Appeal of Traffic Impact Fee Assessment for a Discount Store use in a General Commercial Zone A summary of the decision of the Hearings any, are available for review at no cost Officer and supplemental findings are at the Department of Land Use and attached. His decision may be appealed to the Transportation. Copies of this material Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) by filing a will be provided at reasonable cost. Notice of Intent to Appeal with LUBA within 21 days of the date of this decision. Contact your attorney if you have any questions in this regard. DATE OF DECISION April 20, 2000 For further information contact the Land Use Board of Appeals at 503-373-1265. The Notice to Mortgagee, Lien Holder, complete case, including Notice of Decision, Vendor:•ORS Chapter 215 requires Application, Staff Report, Findings and that if you receive this notice it must Conclusions, and Conditions of Approval, if promptly be forwarded to the purchaser • • • Notice of Decision of Hearings Officer April 20, 2000 Page 2 CASEFILE NUMBER: 99-581-APPEALtTIF) SUMMARY OF DECISION: On April 20, 2000, the Washington County Hearings Officer issued a written decision (Attachment "B") on the request for an Appeal of Traffic Impact Fee Assessment for aDiscount Store use in a General Commercial Zone on property located at 7850 SW Dartmouth, Tigard, Oregon, CPO 4M, and described as tax lot 2200 on assessor map 1S1 36CD, WM, Washington County, Oregon. His decision is as follows: ORDER: The Appeal is DENIED. Attachments: A. Vicinity Map B. Hearings Officer's Findings, Conclusion and Order 4 , • ATTACH/CT A VICINITY MAP TAX MAP/LOT NO. 1S1 36 CD 02200 CASE FILE NO. 99-581-APPEAL(TIF) h 1 i - I Lil i [IA..I ri Ill . 13136CC00100 Ilit 4 S136CC00211 S136co00l00 . 1S136CD01000 .111111111k 0 & :: •� ,S,36DOOSOO -1- G 4 + -,,-. , I 1S136CD02000 U -- N..A .. , ¢ t.( 1S136DC04500 AS* I '''''':'''''''''' ,..." ''' ' DrT a,. � s :' r`. Y. --1;--:: a v _ '::,:*2.1.---1=1,7---:,,g 2S101BA00200 t = _ 257016601 I1I CSCx a ._ -_ 2S1078B01201 2S1018A00101 • I/ • - 2S101BB07400 _ 2S1018A00300 ti* �� , 2S101BAO0401•hi,%1 2S1018C00301 �...101BCOO,O1 %g 31O,BD001OO ■ sassier* 2S1o,sr11.11 , 1 tirsi p ■ raisaina ■ r w REVIEW STANDARDS FROM CURRENT OR 4 NORTH -_r=.b_ AREA OF CONSIDERATION APPLICABLE ORDINANCE OR PLAN A. WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SCALE: 1"TO 500' B. APPLICABLE COMMUNITY PLAN(See Front of Notice) C. TRANSPORTATION PLAN D. WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE: SITE&SURROUNDING LAND USE DISTRICTS: ARTICLE I,INTRODUCTION&GENERAL PROVISIONS ARTICLE II,PROCEDURES CITY OF TIGARD ARTICLE III,LAND USE DISTRICTS ARTICLE IV,DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARTICLE V,PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES ARTICLE VI,LAND DIV.&LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS • ARTICLE VII,PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES E. R&O 86-95 TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS F. ORD.NO.318 UNIFORM ROAD IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS G. ORD.NO.379 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE H. R&0 91-75 SURFACE WATER QUALITY/QUANTITY ATTACHMENT "B" HEARING BEFORE WASHINGTON COUNTY HEARINGS OFFICER CASEFILE NO. 99-581 APPLICANT: Costco PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ACTION: : Appeal of Traffic Impact Fee Assessment for a Discount Store Use in a Commercial Zone - FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS,AND ORDER FINDINGS 1. This Hearing was held on March 16, 2000. This is an appeal by the Applicant of the City.of-Tigard's determination of a_traffic impact fee (T/F) pursuant to Washington County Ordinance 379 as amended (TIF Ordinance.) This Ordinance established a tax on development. The-Ordinance provides that the fee-shall be based on trip determination as set forth in Appendix A. Appendix A sets forth a number of land use categories and their corresponding average weekday trips. The trip rates and categories are generally based on the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip Generation Manual-Fourth Addition.-- 2. Brian Rager and Gary Firestone appeared on behalf of the City of Tigard. Clark Berry appeared on behalf of Washington County. Mr. Rager summarized the Staff Report. He stated that the Applicant was classified as Category 815 Discount Store. He stated that of all the categories available in the Fourth Edition of the (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, this was the closest category to the use of the Applicant. Mr. Rager acknowledged that the Sixth Edition of the (ITE) Trip Generation Manual contains a category of"Discount Club." He stated that he agreed with the Applicant that this category better describes Applicant's use. He contended, however, that-the Washington County TIF Ordinance No. 379 requires the use of the Fourth Edition of(ITE) Trip Generation Manual. 3. The record was left open to allow the parties the opportunity to submit additional information and argument. Page 1 of 1 Findings Conclusion and Order • • 4. By Memo dated April 7, 2000 John Ringert, P.E., Mark Vandehey, P.E., on behalf of the Applicant, submitted additional arguments in favor of the Applicant's position. They argued: While we understand the approach the City used to determine Costco's traffic impact fee,we believe it is inconsistent with the intent of the TIE ordinance,which is to use the ITE trip generation manual as the basis for determining the impact fee. This case is unique in that at the time the County developed their ordinance several years ago, ITE(in its 4th Edition of Trip Generation)did not have a use that matched the operation and nature of membership warehouses such as Costco. Since that time there have been two updates to the ITE trip generation manual(the 5th and 6th Editions). Both of those -. . updates contained a use that match[sic] Costco extremely well: ITE land use 861, Discount Club. The following is an excerpt from ITE 5th edition,which describes - Discount Club: "A discount club is a discount store/warehouse whose shoppers pay a membership fee in order to take advantage of discount prices on a wide variety of items including food, clothing,tiresi appliances, etc.;many items are sold in bulk." The City of Tigard staff,in their testimony, agreed the Discount Club classification is more representative of Costco than"Discount Store". Therefore,both parties(Costco and City staff)are in agreement on this subject. Considering these facts,we believe it is appropriate to use the most recent ITE land use information as the basis for determining the traffic impact fee for this project. 5. The attorneys for the City of Tigard, Ramis Crew Corrigan and Bachrach also submitted a memorandum arguing the City of Tigard's position. They argued: The only issue in this case is whether the Discount Store category was the correct category or whether some other category can be used The City of Tigard continues to take the position that the Discount Store category was properly applied. Page 2 of 2 Findings Conclusion and Order • • The amount of TIF is set by Washington County Code Section 3.17.050. Subsection A of that section provides: The amount of the tax due shall be determined by multiplying the following applicable dollar amount, adjusted as provided in subsection E of this section,by the number of average weekday trips generated by the new development in accordance with the basis for trip determination set forth in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated herein. Under this provision,Appendix A is used to determine the amount of the TIF. The applicant has made an argument that-subsection B of section 3.17.050 applies. That section provides in relevant part: In the event an identified use does not have a basis for trip determination stated in Appendix A,i.e.,not available,the director shall This section only applies to uses that are identified in Appendix A but do not have a basis for trip determination stated in Appendix A. In other words, subsection B only applies if the use is found in Exhibit A and the entry under the column"Basis for Trip Determination"is"Not Available." Applicant's argument therefore fails because the Discount Store category has a basis for trip determination. This is not a situation in which Appendix A lists the"Basis for Trip Determination"as"Not Available"but rather is a situation in which the Applicant claims that the development does not precisely fit within an Appendix A category. In this situation,the Countywide Traffic Impact Fee Procedures Manual provides: Land uses and their corresponding values are provided in Table 11.1. (Appendix A of the TIF Ordinance). The most similar land use must be chosen from the list in Table 11.1. If there are questions regarding the Page 3 of 3 Findings Conclusion and Order • appropriate land use description,the Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE)Trip Generation Manual -4th Edition(source of Table H.1 values)may be consulted,however you MUST choose a use from those listed. Procedures Manual Section II.A.(Emphasis in original.) The Procedures Manual further provides: On occasion,the TIF will need to be assessed against a particular land use which is not specifically listed in Table II.1 (Appendix A of the TIF Ordinance)under the Land Use Category/Description column. As examples,land uses such as a bowling alley, zoo, or a tire store are not specifically listed in Table 11.1.,however,under_the provisions of the TIF Ordinance a land use-category from Table II.1 must be selected for each use. Choosing a Land Use Category _ 1. Refer only to the Land Use Category/Description Column to choose the appropriate land use. Trip generation is not an issue at this point. 2. Choose a land use category from Table II.1 (Appendix A of the TIF Ordinance)which is most similar in use to the actual land use being considered(Ex. 492 Racquet Club may be chosen for a bowling alley). The land use descriptions contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers(I'1'E)Trip Generation Manual-4 Edition,may be consulted to assist in this decision,but is not mandatory. 3. If the most similar land use category listed in Table II.1 has a Basis for Trip Determination,then the corresponding trip rate must be used to calculate the TIF. The traffic study option listed in Section II.F of this manual is not to be used in this situation. The selection of the land use category is discretionary however,and is subject to appeal to the Washington County Hearings Officer. 4. If the most similar land use category listed in Table II.1 has no Basis for Trip Determination,i.e.Not Available,then you must follow the procedures listed in Section II.F of this manual (Ex. 843-Auto Parts Sale many be chosen for a tire store). Discretionary decisions made in this process are also appealable. Page 4 of 4 Findings Conclusion and Order • • • Procedures Manual Section ll.G. The City followed the TIF Procedures Manual and chose the use from the Appendix A list that is most like the use of the development. The City used the "Discount Store" category for a large discount store. Applicant has suggested that a use category,Discount Club,from the 6th edition of the ITE Manual is appropriate. However, that use category is not in Appendix A and therefore cannot be used. - 6. The TIF is a tax WCC 3.17.020 A states, "[t]his tax is adopted to ensure that new development contributes to extra capacity transportation improvements needed to accommodate additional traffic generated by such development." This section continues, °[t]his tax shall provide funds for extra capacity improvements to county and city arterials and certain collectors or state facilities." WCC 3:.17.020 B. The intent of this section is that"new development" as a category of activity shall be taxed to provide funds to construct capacity improvements to roads and other transportation facilities. 7. The Applicant believes that since.there is a more precise definition of the Applicant's use in a subsequent Edition of the ITE Manual it should be used, because it would be consistent with the intent of the TIF Ordinance. Like any tax, the logic or consistency of the system of taxation established by the TIF Ordinance may be - gyestioned. Like any tax, there maybe inequities or perceived inequities in the application of the tax in a specific situation. There are very few, if any taxes, which are not perceived to be inequitable by someone in specific situations. 8. In this case the TIF Ordinance provides that the fee shall be based on trip determination as set forth in Appendix A. Appendix A sets forth a number of land use categories and their corresponding average weekday trips. As noted above the trip rates and categories are generally based on the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip Generation Manual Fourth Edition. The drafters of the TIF Ordinance for one reason or another did not provide for reference to possible future Editions of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, for determination of trip bases. Subsection A of Washington Page 5 of 5 Findings Conclusion and Order • • • County Code Section 3.17.050. in essence establishes a formula to determine the amount of the tax due. The formula established by Subsection A of Washington County Code Section 3.17.050. clearly provides that the amount of the tax due shall be determined by multiplying the applicable dollar amount, by the number of average weekday trips generated by the new development in accordance with the basis for trip determination set forth in Appendix A.(emphasis added). Appendix A has a Category 815 Discount Store. It is undisputed that of all the categories available in the Fourth Edition of the (1TE) Trip Generation Manual this is the closest category to the use of the Applicant. 9. The formula established by Subsection A of Washington County Code Section 3.17.050, unfortunately for the Applicant, does not contain-a.provision allowing the use of categories in subsequent editions of the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Categories in subsequent ITE Trip Generation Manual cannot be considered by the City of Tigard, because the Ordinance does not authorize use of any edition but the Fourth Edition. 10. The fact that the Sixth Edition of the (1TE) Trip Generation Manual contains a category of"Discount Club" that may better describe Applicant's use is not relevant, because the Ordinance does not provide for the use of Sixth Edition. If this conclusion leads to an illogical, or unintended result or inequitable result, the remedy is legislative. Neither the City's Staff or this Hearings Officer have the authority to amend the TIF Ordinance, to allow the use of the Sixth Edition of the(ITE) Trip Generation Manual. CONCLUSION Based on the findings above the Appeal must be denied. The findings of the City of Tigard must be upheld Page 6 of 6 Findings Conclusion and Order • ORDER Based on the findings above the Appeal is denied. The findings of the City of Tigard are upheld April 20, 2000 ` ale M. Hermann Hearings Officer Page 7 of 7. Findings Conclusion and Order •► . • RECOMMENDATION AND CASEFILE: 99-581-APPEAL (TIF) STAFF REPORT APPLICANT: Costco Wholesale—Tigard 7850 SW Dartmouth PROCEDURE TYPE: III Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4M APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: Ken Kroeger Tigard Mulvanny Architects 11820 Northrup Way E300 LAND USE DISTRICT: Bellevue, WA 98005 City of Tigard OWNER: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Costco Wholesale Corp. Attn: Excise Tax Dept. III ASSESSOR MAP# 1S1 36 CD 999 Lake Drive Issaquah, WA 98027 TAX LOT# 2200 ADDRESS: 7850 SW Dartmouth, Tigard PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ACTION: Appeal of Traffic Impact Fee Assessment for a Discount Store use in a General Commercial Zone March 16, 2000 I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of appeal Attachments: 1. Appendix "a" from Washington County TIF Ordinance No. 379 2. City approval of minor modification, dated June 3, .1999 3. Applicant's building permit application, dated November 23, 1999 4. Section 3.17:050 from the Washington County TIF Ordinance No. 379 5. Sections II.A and B from the TIF Procedures Manual 6. City assessment of applicant's TIF, dated December 6, 1999 7. Letter of appeal from applicant, dated December 9, 1999 A ATTACENT A VICINITY MAP' TAX MAP/LOT NO. 1S1 36 CD 02200 CASE FILE NO. 99-581-APPEAL(TIF1 iiiiLLJihffii \ ' MI IP 1S136CC00100 4 . III ,. II s,36C0001ao . 1S136CD01000 `IAy -- AAAA ` 1S136DC00500 — _w 1S136CD02000 ' 1"--,N 1S136DC04500 As*I I . •• : . O , ._ , _ _ _ ._ , „ c) ` h __,, _ _ : _, . SI 11 2S101BAO0200 dilL._ 2S101BBO1 is - 251018801201 26101BA00101 1i• • 2S101BBO1400 • _ 2S101BA00300 y W 2S101BA00401 ' 2S101BC00301 P ' 101BC00101 4 s,o,B0001oo im, Niiimir ill`2s, u,B.,,,,.,t*,4 p ■■■ rasp :; REVIEW STANDARDS FROM CURRENT OR 411 NORTH Y`_`> AREA OF CONSIDERATION APPLICABLE ORDINANCE OR PLAN A. WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SCALE: 1"TO 500' B. APPLICABLE COMMUNITY PLAN(See Front of Notice) C. TRANSPORTATION PLAN D. WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE: SITE&SURROUNDING LAND USE DISTRICTS: ARTICLE I,INTRODUCTION&GENERAL PROVISIONS ARTICLE II,PROCEDURES CITY OF TIGARD ARTICLE III,LAND USE DISTRICTS ARTICLE IV,DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARTICLE V,PUBLIC FACIUTIES AND SERVICES ARTICLE VI,LAND DIV.&LOT UNE ADJUSTMENTS ARTICLE VII,PUBUC TRANSPORTATION FACIUTIES E. R&O 86-95 TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS F. ORD.NO.318 UNIFORM ROAD IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS G. ORD.NO.379 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE H. R&O 91-75 SURFACE WATER QUALITY/QUANTITY r , r� STAFF REPORT --�+i' .:a. CITY OF TIGARD CASEFILE NO.: 99-581-APPEAL (TIF) OREGON PROCEDURE TYPE: III APPLICANT: Ken Kroeger Mulvanny Architects 11820 Northup Way, E300 Bellevue, WA 98005 OWNER: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Costco Wholesale - Tigard ASSESSOR MAP#: 1S1 36CD 7805 SW Dartmouth Street Lot#: 2200 Tigard, OR 97223 Site Size: 4.39 AC Address: 7805 SW Dartmouth Street Tigard, OR 97223 ZONE CLASSIFICATION: CG PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ACTION: Appeal of Traffic Impact Fee Assessment for a Discount Store use in a General Commercial Zone. I. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: A. Resolution No. 94-18, authorizing the administration of the Washington County Traffic Impact Fee in the City of Tigard effective April 12,_1994. B. Ordinance 379 - Countywide Traffic Impact Fee Section 3.17.050 Amount II. FINDINGS: A. Background 1. On November 4, 1990, Washington County voters approved Ordinance 379, adopting the County-wide Traffic Impact Fee. This action placed into effect an expanded tax on all new development in Washington County including incorporated cities. Appendix "A" of this ordinance (see Attachment 1) sets the trip rates for land uses and is based on trip rates 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 • • 99-581-APPEAL (TIF) PAGE2 found in the Fourth Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. Resolution No. 94-18 was introduced and passed by the Tigard City Council on April 12, 1994. 2. On June 3, 1999, the City granted approval for a Minor Modification that would allow a 10,416 square foot addition to the applicant's building. (see Attachment 2). 3. On November 8, 1999, the applicant made application to the City for a • building permit for the building addition on the subject site (see Attachment 3). 4. Consistent with Section 3.17.050 (Amount) of the TIF Ordinance (see Attachment 4) and Section II.A and B in the TIF Procedures Manual (see Attachment 5), the City calculated the Traffic Impact Fee by using Land Use Category 815 (Discount Store), as defined in Ordinance No. 379, Appendix "A". The average weekday trip identified in the Ordinance was 70.16 trips per thousand gross square feet of new area. The TIF assessment (see Attachment 6) for the new building, based on a gross square footage of new building area of 10,416 square feet, was $37,270.00, and was calculated as follows: (10,416/1000) (70.16) = 730.79 trips (196.57) ($51.00/trip) = $37,270.00 5. The applicant is appealing the staffs assessment by asserting that the City should have used a trip rate for a "Discount Club", which is Land Use Category #861 in the Sixth Edition of the Institute of Transportation • Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual (see Attachment 7). The Sixth Edition ITE indicates a trip rate of 41.8 trips per thousand gross square feet of floor area. B. Ordinance No. 379 - Traffic Impact Fee 1. Section 3.17.050, Amount A. The amount of the tax due shall be determined by multiplying the following applicable dollar amount, adjusted as provided in subsection E of this section, by the number of average weekday trips generated by the new development in accordance with the basis for trip determination set forth in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated herein. • 99-581-APPEAL (TIF) • PAGE 3 Residential use $ 201 per average weekday trip Business and Commercial use $ 51 per average weekday trip Office use $ 184 per average weekday trip Industrial use $ 193 per average weekday trip Institutional use $ 83 per weighted average daily trip (NOTE: Adjusted rates effective July 1, 1999) B. In the event an identified use does not have a basis for trip • determination stated in Appendix A, i.e., not available, the director shall either: 1. Determine the trip generation based on the use listed in Appendix A most similar in traffic generation; or 2. At the election (and expense) of the applicant, consider actual trip generation of a same or similar use verified by a registered traffic engineer. In the event actual trip generation is utilized, the director may make such adjustments as he deems applicable in consideration of location, size and other appropriate factors in determining the average weekday trips. Section.3.17.050(A) requires the Director to determine which of the categories contained within Appendix A relates to the proposed development. Only in cases where a "basis for trip determination" is not listed (i.e. the trip rate is listed as "not available"), can the Director consider trip generation information from the ' applicant's traffic engineer. Section II.A of the TIF Procedures Manual states that the "most similar land use must be chosen from the list in Table 11.1. If there are questions regarding the appropriate land use description, the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual —4th Edition (source of the Table 11.1 values) may be consulted, however you MUST choose a use from those listed." The City, from knowledge of the existing use and review of the proposed construction plans for the building addition, made the determination that the proposed use falls within the Discount Store category. The City agrees that the definition of"Discount Club", as listed in the Sixth Edition of the ITE Manual, more closely relates to the applicant's business than the definition of"Discount Store". However, the City is forbidden to use the Discount Club trip rate because that use is not listed among the uses in Table 11.1 of the Procedures Manual (Appendix A of the Ordinance). The Discount Store category is most similar to the applicant's business, and selection of this category complies with Section 3.17.050(A) of the TIF Ordinance and is required by Sections II.A and B of the Procedures Manual. . . 99-581-APPEAL (TIF) PAGE 4 As stated previously, Appendix A of the TIF Ordinance provides information related to the "basis for trip determination". Most categories have a basis for trip determination related to gross square feet of building area. More specifically, the number of trips assessed to a discount store use is figured by multiplying the indicated weekday average trip rate by the number of"thousands" of gross square feet (TGSF) there are in the building. In the applicant's example, the proposed building addition is to be 10,416 square feet. The Discount Store trip rate is 70.16 trips per thousand gross square feet per day. Therefore, the number of trips was calculated as follows: 10.416 X 70.16 = 730.79 trips. The City clearly followed the procedure provided by the TIF Ordinance. III. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above findings, Staff recommends denial of the appeal. V. ATTACHMENTS 1. Appendix "A" from the Washington County TIF Ordinance No. 379. 2. City approval of Minor Modification, dated June 3, 1999. 3. Applicant's building permit application, dated November 23, 1999. 4. Section 3.17.050 from the Washington County TIF Ordinance No. 379. 5. Sections II.A and B from the TIF Procedures Manual. 6. City assessment of applicant's TIF, dated December 6, 1999. 7. Letter of appeal from applicant, dated December 9, 1999. Utig333W sAdepts\eng\brianrkeports‘costco-2000-titappeal-report.doc e •TTACHMENT 1 Washington County Code 3.17 Appx.A --- APPENDIX A WEEKDAY WEEKEND LAND USE BASIS FOR TRIP AVERAGE AVERAGE CATEGORY/DESCRIPTION DETERMINATION TRIP RATE TRIP RATE • Residential 210-Single-Family Detached Housing Number of Units 10.0 220-Apartment 11 " 6.10 ,, 221-Low-Rise Apartment " " „ 6.60 222-}Ugh-Rise Apartment " " 4.20 . 230-Residential Condominium " " „ . 5.85 231-Low-Rise Condominium Not Available * 232-High-Rise Condominium Number of Units. 4.18 . 240-Mobile Home " " „ 4.81 250-Retirement Community " " " 3.30 ft 260-Recreational Home " It 3.16 270-Planned Unit Development (Residential) " " " 7.44 Institutional 010-Waterports Ship Berths 100.003 * 020-Airport Not Available * * • 021-Commercial Airport Avg.Flights/Day 11.83 * 022-General Aviation Airport " " Of 3.06 - * 030-Truck Terminals .T.G.S.F. 9.86 040-Railroad Terminal Not Available * * . 410-Park Parking Spaces 7.58 1L82 411-City Park Acres 3.66 - 33.58 412-County Park Acres 2.11 :::2.26 413-State Park Acres 1.05 1.78- 420-Marina Boat Berths 3.00 5.55 430-Golf Course Parking Spaces 6.62 5.95 440-Theater Not Available * . 441-Live Theater " " * * 442-Music Theater 443-Movie Theater(sit down) Parking Spaces 6.19' .. .7.18'- 444-Drive-In Theater Not Available * * 450-Stadium Parking Spaces 0.55 • * 451-Baseball/Football Not Available * 452-Horse Race Parking Spaces 1.08 • * 453-Auto Race Not Available * * 454-Dog Race . " " * 460-Camp " " * *„ 491-Tennis Courts T.G.S.F. 32.93 23.8.0_. 492-Racquet Clubs 15.94 23.85 501-Military Base Number of Employees 1.78 * 510-Preschool Not Available * * 520-Elementary School Number of Students 1.03 * 530-High School " " " 1.39 * 540-Junior/Community College " " " 1.55 * (Washington County 11-98) • • Washington County Code 3.17 Appx.A WEEKDAY WEEKEND LAND USE BASIS FOR TRIP AVERAGE AVERAGE CATEGORY/DESCRIPTION DETERMINATION TRIP RATE TRIP RATE 550—University Number of Students 2.41 * 560—Church T.G.S.F. 7.70 18.18 565—Day Care Center 67.00 6.15 570—Court Not Available * * 571—Prison " " * * 580—Museum/Gallery " " * * 590—Library T.G.S.F. • 45.50 25.39 610—Hospital T.G.S.F. 16.69 11.29 620—Nursing Home Number of Beds 2.60 2.26 Business and Commercial 310—Hotel Number of Rooms . 8.70 320—Motel " " If 10.19 330—Resort Hotel " " " 18.40 810—Retail-General Not Available * Merchandise 811—Specialty Store " " * 812—Building Materials/Lumber T.G.S.F. 30.56 813—Lumber Not Available * 814—Specialty Retail Center T.G.LS.F. 40.68 815—Discount Stores 70.16 816—Hardware/Paint Store T.G.S.F. 53.21 817—Nursery 36.17 820A—Shopping Center under 50,000 Gr.Sq.Ft. T.G.LS.F. 94.71 820B—Shopping Center 50,000- 99,999 Gr.Sq.Ft. T.G.LS.F. 84312 820C—Shopping Center 100,000- 199,999 Gr.Sq.Ft. 66.622 820D—Shopping Center 200,000- 299,999 Gr.Sq.Ft. 53.622 820E—Shopping Center 300,000- 399,999 Gr.Sq.Ft. 45.662 820F—Shopping Center 400,000- 499,999 Gr.Sq.Ft. " 41.412 820G—Shopping Center 500,000- 999,999 Gr.Sq.Ft. 36.632 820H—Shopping Center 1,000,000- 1,200,000 Gr.Sq.Ft. " 32.822 8201—Shopping Center Over 1,200,000 Gr.Sq.Ft. 32.382 831—Quality Restaurant T.G.S.F. 95.622 . 832—High-Turnover,Sit-Down Restaurant 100.003 833—Drive-In Restaurant 100.003 834—Drinking Place Not Available * 841—New Car Sale T.G.S.F. 47.52 842—Used Car Sale Not Available " * • (Washington County 11-98) • • • Washington County Code 3.17 Appx.A WEEKDAY WEEKEND LAND USE BASIS FOR TRIP AVERAGE AVERAGE CATEGORY/DESCRIPTION DETERMINATION TRIP RATE TRIP RATE 843—Auto Parts Sale Not Available 844—Service Station No.of Pumps 100.003 845—Tires Battery and Accessory Not Available 846—Car Wash Not Available 847—Auto Repair Not Available 848—Highway Oasis(including truck fuel, minimal trucker and mechanical services) " " 849—Truck Stop(including. food,auto and truck mechanical services, trucker supplies and trucker overnight sleeping accommodations) Not Available 850—Supermarket T.G.S.F. 100.003 - 851—Convenience Market , " 100.003 870—Apparel 3.33 890—Furniture Store " " 4.35 895—Video Arcade " " 9.60 911—Bank(walk-in) " " 100.003 912—Drive-In Bank " " 100.003 913—Savings and Loan(walk-in) " " 61.00 914—Drive-In Savings and Loan - 100.003 Office 630—Clinic T.G.S.F. 23.79 • 710A_General Office,Under 100,000 Gross Square Feet(G.S.F.) • 16.31 710B—General Office, 100,000- 199,999 G.S.F. 12.40 710C—Genes al.Office,200,000- 299,999 G.S.F. 11.54 710D—General Office,300,000- 399,999 G.S.F. 10.425 710E—General Office,400,000- 499,999 G.S.F. 9.705 710E—General Office,500,000- 599,999 G.S.F. 9.175 710G—General Office,600,000- 699,999 G.S.F. 8.775 710H—General Office,700,000- 799,999 G.S.F. 8.435 7101—General Office,800,000 G.S.F.and Over 8.165 714—Corporate Headquarters Bldg. 7.015 720—Medical Office Building 34.17 (Washington County 11-98) • • Washington County Code 3.17 Appx.A WEEKDAY WEEKEND LAND USE BASIS FOR TRIP AVERAGE AVERAGE CATEGORY/DESCRIPTION DETERMINATION TRIP RATE TRIP RATE 730—Government Office Building T.G.S.F. 68.93 731—State Motor Vehicles Department 16.60 732—U.S.Post Office " " 86.78 740—Civic Center " " 25.00 750—Office Park USE General Office 760—Research Center T.G.S.F. 6.09 770—Business Park 12.42 910—Financial Not Available 915—Stockbroker 916—Lending Agency " " * 920—Real Estate " " 930—Insurance T.G.S.F. 11.45 Industrial 110—General Light Industrial T.G.S.F. 6.97 120—General Heavy Industrial 1.50 130—Industrial Park 6.97 140—Manufacturing 3.85 150—Warehouse 4.88 151—Mini-Warehouse 2.61 170—Utilities Employees 1.07 180—Agricultural Not Available 860—Wholesale •T.G.S.F. 6.73 NOTES • Not Available-Indicates that the 1TE manual does not contain information for this use.Therefore,the basis for trip determination shall be as set forth in Section 3.17.040(D). I Without Matinees 2 Note:Rate obtained by taking average of maximum and minimum rates of range Note:Rate capped at 100.00 Note:Category may be used for permits submitted after January 15,1996 s. Categories may be used for permits submitted after the effective date of Ordinance 514,and for permits submitted on or after December 1,1996,and for which a TIF appeal was filed by October 1,1997. TGSF-Thousand Gross Square Feet TGLSF-Thousand Gross Leasable Square Feet (Washington County 11-98) •• ATTACHMENT 2 June 3, 1999 r44144,1„111'W CITY OF TIGARD Costco Wholesale Attn. Jackie Frank OREGON 999 Lake Drive -. Issaquah, WA 98027 RE: Tigard Costco Wholesale Expansion — Minor Modification Approval Dear Ms. Frank: I This letter is in response to your request for Minor Modifi ion approval to the existing Costco Wholesale site (approved under SDR 93-000 Final Order No. 93- 17PC). The property is.located at 7850 SW Dartmouth (WCT 1S1 36CD, Tax Lot 2200). The existing site includes a 135,404 square foot building with 742 parking stalls. The proposed modification includes a 10,416 square foot building addition and reconfiguration of the parking lot from an angled layout to a perpendicular layout. This will yield a net increase of five parking spaces for a total of 747 stalls. The proposal will continue to meet or exceed the landscaping requirements of the original site development approval. This property is zoned General Commercial (C-G) in which a retail use is permitted. The Tigard Community Development Code Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, provides that a modification to an approved site plan may be a Major or a Minor Modification. Major Modifications are processed as a new Site Development Review application. Section 18.360.050.B states that the Director shall determine that a Major Modification will result if one (1) or more of the following changes are proposed: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density, or lot coverage for residential development; 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units; 3. A change that requires additional on-site. parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765; • 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code; 5. An increase in the height of the building by more than 20 percent; 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected; 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day; . 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a non-residential use by more than 10 percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet; 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space by more than 10 percent; 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 . rage 1 of 2 • • 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening, and/or landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10 percent where specified in the site plan; 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that are not the subject of criteria (B) 1 through 10 above; Staff has reviewed your submittal, which includes site plans and building elevations prepared by Mulvanny Architects, a letter addressing vehicle trip generation prepared by Kittelson and Associates, and an analysis and findings prepared by WRG Design. With respect to the criteria listed above, staff concurs that the proposed expansion is a Minor Modification. Based on the analysis provided by WRG Design, the Director has approved this Minor Modification request subject to the original conditions of approval of Final Order No. 93-17PC. The proposed findings prepared by WRG Design are incorporated herein by reference as the basis for this decision. With respect to the transportation system within the Tigard Triangle, the City appreciates Costco's offer to contribute $14,667 toward the much needed intersection improvements at 72nd Avenue/Dartmouth, and 68th Avenue/Dartmouth. Although the contribution is not a requirement for development or a condition of this approval, Staff agrees that the proposed sum is consistent with recent assessments on development projects in this area of the Triangle. Please submit a copy of this letter with your application for site and building permits. If you have any further questions regarding this decision, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x315. Sincerely, Mark J. Roberts Associate Planner iAcurpin\rnark\rninmod\costco.doc • C: Glenn Hirai, Mulvanny Architects Jennifer Snyder, WRG Design Planning Case File SDR 93-00018 1999 Planning Correspondence File MMD1999-00002 6/3/99 Jackie Frank,Costco Wholesale Letter Page 2 of 2 Re: Costco Expansion Minor Modification Approval Sent By:, \G DESIGN INC. ; 503 603 9944; Aug-1 ATTACHMENT 3 MY OF ' ,.G D Commeal Building Permit Appeaticip Plan Check at —Z-5(-' 11'5 SW LL LVD. New Construction and Additions Redd By Date Recd 1- GARD, OR -:}3 Date to P.F. - - 9 03) 639 171 Date to Dar. Print or Type Permit#et;e,P1 999-03 4197 401T)/11 Incomplete or illegible applications will not be accepted Related « mA j Called A I - ti 0 i CL W' Name of Development/Project Job CDS-1zo i,.n1/412 }tot.)se. . Address street Address Suite Existing Building 1S1' New Building 0 Ig5® Sw D— -- _ Building Bldg* City/State Zip • Data .:mo• • • ' 2- Existing Use of Building or Property: Name Property Loe_ C-Lo w IiDII.v.- � �- S - _ Owner Mailing Address Suite Proposed Use of Building or Property: O O1c1 1---NY VtZ1V t% — -k1 Lr City/Stale Zip Phone No. Stories: S 1S5Pcook-sir-ItJ, 98D2-- 416-)N ./6710,t• t Occupant Name Sq. Ft.Of Project: • coSTZo 1A- 1$t), tz-4-&.4.4 4) toI--tGe,(kl ,mom) Name Occupancy Class(es) Contractor Kp$1h So►-∎ eta ST ryL1 roe] 6-2 C,-A ,use .1 6-112 . Prior to permit Mailing Address Suite Type(s)of Construction Hof anae,a spy '/1ZO H S)fim,geruna D r v_ -J. of all licenses �, l� L are required if City/State Zip Phone Will this project have a Fire Suppressio Sys em? expired in C.D.T. Yes No El database j4r 11 sbO,( pc ?1 t zq b'i 54531 eo Oregon Const.Cont.Board Lic,tt Exp Dat Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA) R k ( ooh Valuation X 25%; Participation 3 Iy7 ��l a Complete Accessibility Form Name. Project $ 2 ._--- . Architect 1 I tn0 141.g Wit-1414-f k 4nj' --r -› Valuation IA Mailing Address Suite • ���'1, tt'32oj-k012S1VP ti.AN-( -3OO ( Plans Required: See Matrix for number of sets to submit Tr City/State Zip Phone on back - . Engineer Name I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application,that the information lGf S 1 �L, given is correct,that I am the owner or authorized agent of the owner,and I, .pc,/011\� Mailing Address Suite that plans submitted are in compliance with Oregon State Laws. V' 1094 W�c-�u.4 ,,)4r, --- Signet re of ner/Agant Date City/State • Zip Phone 8 I ' • . .tt�. _ .,_ `i %t ►. ,. • . ,C//on act P-���Name Phone idicate type of work New 0 ddition) Demolition O f�4 4= ,E— _445)/0 02'IS2.3 ccessory Struauro 0 Foundation Only 0 ter Repair 0 Other 0 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY - ascription of work: PAP t-T1 o.i tb I-tl�µ Sht..t� r' iFr� 1 Map/T #' -land Use- .C�r coo[- c rr�uo. op Oo�- voog 'ifVf- e(>:/Oa�w4 r. /-5 I �(.00_,(9— -2. ?OM Gt.t,etr.l for% S it:, 'l'1t•/CT-0'1) , k t►-�', �t?L WM/ -._ _ cy , . ' kytn Notes: r • vim: E ttmated/of Employees TIF: /-/b 94 �+ ��a Gtda lon 42/ 10 I a G?� vi•«.. ' rive._ - ..I,�v d c:o the above figure is not supplied at t e ti e of application,the city will P�(U./�,.(.• --er_. " '&- , .ulata the fee based upon the number of parking spaces. `� U (� y� / ` ' ��`' C�y .F: �� •Site Work Permit Application must precede or accompany - t.�J v "` /".4' ale/eV t u.i 7>� APP P company Building r __... . �,; lit Application h 4yy5 4Lgp 56,g, 3,r .47 az- 4/1i.,le • PQ 3105/. 94 (34.0 et- 2241. 34 134.4'4 O • •TTACHMENT 4 Washington County Code 3.17.040 6. Development not subject to this chapter pursuant to Section 3.17.160; 7. A transit improvement which has the impact of removing vehicle trips or reducing vehicle miles of travel on the county's major roadway system,as approved by the director. 8. Construction, remodeling or expansion of federal or state facilities otherwise exempt from taxation by counties. (Ord.379 §3(Exhibit A(part)), 1990) 3.17.050 Amount. A. The amount of the tax due shall be determined by multiplying the following applicable dollar amount, adjusted as provided in subsection E of this section, by the number of average weekday trips generated by the new development in accordance with the basis for trip determination set forth in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated herein. Residential use $135 per average weekday trip Business and Commercial use $ 34 per average weekday trip Office use $124 per average weekday trip Industrial use $130 per average weekday trip • Institutional use $ 56 per weighted average daily trip The amount of the traffic impact fee for institutional uses shall be based on the weighted average daily calculated as follows: (average weekday trip rate x 5)+(average weekend trip x.2) , 7 •B. In the event an identified use does not have a basis for trip determination stated in Appendix A,i.e.,not available, the director shall either: 1. Determine the trip generation based on the use listed in Appendix A most similar in traffic generation;or.. 2. At the election(and expense)of the applicant,consider actual trip generation of a same or similar use verified by a registered traffic engineer. In the event actual trip generation is utilized,the director may make'such adjustments as he deems applicable in consideration of location,size and other appropriate factors is determining-the average weekday trip. C. It is recognized that single structures may include more than one use. In such event the director for purposes of establishing the traffic impact fee shall proportion the uses accordingly. D. The applicant shall, at the time of application for a building permit, provide the department with necessary and applicable information, such as the type of use, number of employees or square footage of structures, necessary to cal- culate the traffic impact fee. E. Notwithstanding any other provision;the dollar amounts set forth in subsection A of this section shall on May 1st of each year be computed to increase automatically by six percent unless the board of commissioners of the county first determines that the construction cost index is a more accurate estimate of the increase or decrease in construction costs. Upon such a determination,the amounts'set forth in subsection A of this section shall be increased or decreased by the average percentage fluctuation of the construction cost index over the previous ten years.In no event,however,shall there be an annual increase in the excess of six percent. Notwithstanding the.,faregoingr all celeulaiions=shallrbe carried.out-to, the-hundredths place.A.final'product ending id<$0.49 Ar1ess shallte rounded down'tO the mearestmlollaro$0.50 or up'. .to the..next-dollsr, F. The construction cost index for 1986 and subsequent years shall be prepared by an Oregon registered professional engineer employed or retained by the county.The index shall be prepared in accordance with the formula set forth in Ap- pendix B and generally accepted construction cost indexing standards. The Oregon Highway Composite Construction Cost Index for the fourth quarter of 1985,attached to the ordinance codified in this chapter and by this reference incor- porated herein as Appendix C,is adopted as the composite index for the years 1975 through 1985 to be used in computing the average percentage increase or decrease over the previous ten years. G. Washington County promptly shall notify each city in writing of the increase or decrease.The adjustment to the dollar amount as described above apply to all building permit applications accepted for review on or after July 1st,by the county or city having jurisdiction over the development (Washington County 11-98) • Washington County Code 3.17.050 H. The decision of the board, including the accuracy of the construction cost index and its application, shall be ,. reviewable solely under ORS 34.010 through 34.100,relating to writs of review, in the Circuit Court in the county. (Ord. 379§3(Exhibit A(part)), 1990) 3.17.060 Payment. A. Unless deferred, the tax imposed is due and payable at the time of issuance of a building permit by the county or city.Except as otherwise provided in this chapter,no building permit shall be issued for a development subject to this tax unless the tax is first paid in full. B. Notwithstanding subsection A of this section, in those cases where the amount due for any one building permit exceeds five thousand dollars, the applicant may request a payment deferral. The request must be made in writing to the director no later than the time of application for a building permit The director shall grant deferral to the traffic impact fee,however,any traffic impact fee shall be paid in full prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit The amount of TIF due on deferred obligations shall be the amount in effect at the time of issuance of the occupancy permit. Deferred TIF obligations shall not be eligible for internal financing or bancrofting as provided in subsection C unless so requested at the time of application for deferral.Selection of the credit or offset option must be made at the time of application for deferral. Failure to specify shall be deemed to be selection of the credit option.The selection is irrevocable. C. Any traffic impact fee may be eligible for internal financing or a bancrofting agreement pursuant to ORS 223.205 through 223.785,the Bancroft Bonding Act or any adopted city process.Bancrofting and installment payment agreements, as allowed herein,shall be limited in term in the following manner. Traffic impact fee through$1,000 3 years Traffic impact fee from$1,001 through$5,000 5 years Traffic impact fee$5,001 and more 10 years Any installment or bancroft agreement provided by this section shall have an interest rate as determined,,at the time of the application, by the chief county or city financial officer and in recognition of the then current market rates and costs associated with the administration of such agreements.Applications for an agreement,as provided in this chapter,must be made at the time of building permit application,or occupancy permit if permitted pursuant to subsection B of this section. No applications made subsequent to issuance of the building permit,or occupancy permit if allowed by subsection B of this section,shall be considered.Any traffic impact fee using an agreement shall be a lien pursuant to ORS 223.230 or city provision.No offset shall be allowed for any tax satisfied through use of an agreement provided in this section.(Ord.379 §3(Exhibit A(part)), 1990) 3.17.070 Credit. An applicant for a building permit,or occupancy permit if deferral has been granted,.shall be entitled to a credit against the tax for constructing eligible capital improvements as defined herein. A. An extra capacity road or transit improvement is eligible for credit provided it meets all of the following: 1. With the exception of eligible transit improvements, the improvement must be on a facility designated as an arterial or collector facility in the base report,adopted as Appendix D as part of the ordinance codified in this chapter,and incorporated as if fully set forth herein. 2. The improvement must be designed and constructed to provide additional capacity to meet projected future transportation needs.Improvements that address capacity deficiencies existing at the time of development are.not eligible. In the case of improvements addressing both,only that portion providing future capacity is eligible;and 3. The director determines that the timing, location, design and scope of proposed improvement is consistent with and furthers the objectives of the capital improvements program of the jurisdiction and,either; 4. a:The improvement is required to fulfill conditions of development approval issued by the jurisdiction with land use decision making authority;or b. The improvement is within the impact area of the development For purposes of this section, impact area is that geographic area determined by the director in which the estimated traffic to be generated by the development exceeds ten percent of the existing average daily traffic. Existing traffic volumes shall be those observed within six months prior to filing the development application,adjusted for daily and seasonal traffic variations using factors provided by the director. B. A road or transit improvement constructed to address a safety hazard is eligible for credit if it meets the following: (Washington County 11-98) • • ITACHMENT 5 IMandatory Procedure/Ordinance I Mandatory Procedure/Countywide (see Pape VIII-1 for explanation) . II. TIF CALCULATION The Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is based on the amount of new traffic expected to be generated by a developing property. This section describes the methodology for calculating the trip generation and Traffic Impact Fee. The basic formulas are discussed and examples provided. Explanations are also included for situations where the trip rate for a specific land use is not available, and when a specific land use is not listed in the Ordinance. The first.step in calculating the TIF for a developing project is to determine the most appropriate Land Use Category. This category determines.which TIF formula is used. Section 1I.A covers Residential, Business &Commercial, Industrial, and Office uses. Section II.0 explains the process for Institutional uses. A worksheet for TIF calculations is also included. • II.A. RESIDENTIAL. BUSINESS & COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL.AND OFFICE USES. • The Trip Rates for the above four land use categories are identified in the TIF Ordinance. Determining the land use description is the key step in this process. Land uses and their corresponding values are provided in Table 11.1. (Appendix A.of the TIF Ordinance).. The most similar land use must be chosen from the list in Table 11.1. If there are questions regarding the appropriate land use description, the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, Manual -4th Edition (source of the Table 11.1 values) may be consulted, however you MUST choose a use from those listed. . The TIF is calculated using a formula with three (3)variables: ' • • WEEKDAY AVERAGE TRIPS X UNITS .X TRIP RATE = TIF ▪ The WEEKDAY AVERAGE TRIPS, is a value representing an average of the number of trips per unit for each land use type. This value was set by the TIF Ordinance for most land uses and is provided in Table 11.1. (For those uses where an Weekday Average Trip rate is not provided, please refer to Section II.E). • The UNITS value is determined by the developing project's size. The type of units is set for each land use in Table 11.1 and is typically expressed as Thousand Gross Square Feet, #of Units, # of Employees, etc. This value, multiplied with the Weekday Average Trips, determines the estimated trip generation of a project. ▪ The TRIP RATE value is set by the TIF Ordinance (Section 3.17.050) and may be adjusted on a yearly basis. The rates vary according to the land use category and are set as follows: 11-1 • • IMandatory Procedure/Ordinance I Mandatory (see Pape VIII-1 for explanation) TIF Trip Rates (Effective July 1, 1999 June 30, 2000) Residential Use $201.00 per average weekday trip Business and Commercial Use $ 51.00 per average weekday trip Office Use $184.00 per average weekday trip Industrial Use $193.00 per average weekday trip- Institutional Use $ 83.00 per weighted average daily trip A sample °Countywide Traffic Impact Fee Worksheet' is provided on the following page. This worksheet must be used to calculate a development project's TIF for all but single-family residential homes. The completed worksheet shall be retained for official records: II.B. TIF CALCULATION EXAMPLES FOR RESIDENTIAL, BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL, JNDUSTRIAL AND OFFICE USES The calculation is a simple multiplication of the three values(average weekday trips, units, and trip rates) listed on the previous page.-IThe following examples demonstrate TIF.calculations: 1. Residential a. 1 Single-family Residence ITE Category.210- 10.0 weekday average trips per unit 10.0 X 1 X$201.00= $2010.00 TIF (Project's trip generation: 10.0.X 1.= 10) • b. 400 Unit Apartment Complex - ITE Category 220- 6.1 weekday average trips per unit 6.1 X 400 X$201.00=$490,440.00 TIF (Project's trip generation: 6.1 X 400=2440) 2. Business and Commercial 57,000 sq ft Shopping Center (55,000 sq ft leasable space) ITE Category 821 -84.51 weekday average trips per TGLSF 84.51 X 55 X$51 = $237,050.55 TIF (Project's trip generation: 84.51 X 55.0=4648.05) 11-2 1110 • DATE: 1 PLANS CHECK NO.: PROJECT TITLE: COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE APPLICANT: WORKSHEET MAIUNG ADDRESS: (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) CITY/ZIP/PHONE: RATE PER TAX MAP NO.: LAND USE CATEGORY TRIP SITUS NO.ADDRESS: RESIDENTIAL • $201.00 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $51.00, OFFICE $184.00 INDUSTRIAL $193.00. INSTITUTIONAL $83.00 PAY_ MENT METHOD: CASH/CHECK CREDIT INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF WEEKDAY AVG.TRIP WEEKEND AVG.TRIP DEFER TO OCCUPANCY USE. RATE RATE BASIS: CALCULATIONS: • PROJECT TRIP GENERATION: FEE: • FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: ROAD AMT.: TRANSIT AMT.: PREPARED BY: s17/99 . 99--OO.doc CC: WASHINGTON COUNTY TIF NOTEBOOK • • Mandatory Procedure/Ordinance s Mandatory Procedure/Countywide i - fsee Pape VIII-1 for explanation) 3. Office 4,123 sq ft Medical Clinic ITE Category 630 -23.79 weekday average trips per TGSF 23.79 X 4.123 X$184.00= $18,048.56 (Project's trip generation: 23.79 X 4.123 = 98.09) 4. Industrial 72,401 sq ft Industrial Building (part of an approved Industrial Park) ITE Category 130- 6.97 weekday average trips per TGSF- 6.97 X 72.401 X$193.00 = $97,393.59 (Project's trip generation: 6.97 X 72.401 = 504.63) 5. Multiple Use Building 400 room Hotel, 5,100 sq ft Quality Restaurant, and 20,000 sq ft Office space. ITE Category 310 (Hotel) -8.70 weekday average trips per room ITE Category.831 (Quality Restaurant) - 95.62 weekday average trips per TGSF ITE Category 711 (Office) - 16.31 weekday average trips per TGSF 8.70 X 400 X $ 51.00=$177,480.00 .TIF_ 95.62 X 5.1 X$ 51.00=$ 24,870.76 TIF 16.31 X 20 X$184.00=$.60.020.80 TIF Total project TIF=$262,371.56 [Project's trip generation = (8.7 X 400)+(95.62 X 5.1)+(16.31 X 20) =4293.86] II.C. INSTITUTIONAL USES . • Institutional uses are treated differently to reflect traffic generated on a full seven day week basis rather than just the five day work week. As with the above land uses, institutional uses are calculated based on the estimated project trip generation of the use and the trip rate set by the ordinance. The TIF formula is: WEIGHTED AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS X UNITS X TRIP RATE = TIF • The WEIGHTED AVERAGE DAILY TRIP value also includes weekend trips to take into account the inherent differences between weekend trip generation and weekday trip generation for institutional uses. The method for calculating the weighted average for institutional uses was set in section 3.17.050 of the Ordinance. Using the weekday and weekend institutional trip rates found in Table 11.1, the Weighted Average Daily Trips can be calculated for an average week with the following formula: (WEEKDAY AVE. TRIP X 5) + (WEEKEND AVE. TRIP X 2) =WEIGHTED AVE. 7 DAILY TRIPS 11-4 ATTACHMENT 6 • DATE: 49-G 7 7 PLANS CHECK NO. /./....as PROJECT TITLE: / COUNTYWIDE & r&2 4)A Lt ro,v TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE WORKSHEET APPLICANT,. - �s -tfo� -g8�3� nz;IC o�.�f (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) ,Ni6TOMIkuP WA y CITY/ZIP/PHONE:zE LE Ju am.- �QQ 5-- TAX MAP NO.:/Si 3(°co _049,49,00 SITES NO.ADD SS: LAND USE CATEGORY RATE PER TRIP '7 g 5 gw 72)4 /0 u17' RESIDENTIAL $2 y BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL 51.00 OFFICE $ 184.00 INDUSTRIAL • $ 193.00 INSTITUTIONAL $ 83.00 PA YMENT METHOD: C,t)'. ,�g CASH/CHECK (i'� !� CREDIT C BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) ) It INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: DEFER TO OCCUPANCY LA1UJE CATEGORY t DtESSCCORIPON grUS,g l VG 6,00, WEEKEND AVG.TRIP RATE O S TRIP RATE 7 BASIS: APQ LA CA U�" MLOt'o'aC.s A- ! j 4 1(p ..T► ON) 10 /4-0 T eo /30, aaL/0- u., a CALCULATIONS: ? !cob& 7°. ( X -11 ! 'a37/ a70 a9 ",..• J7 o�70 730 . 9 TQI Po PROJECT TRIP GENERATION: FEE: $ 2 7,e9-7-7 0 FOR ACCOUNTING{PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: rr� _ I� cGpfa T2, P -131 X 6 I5 .°° w �t /01 (365 ROAD AMT.: 6 n _5- } Tp-/.4T,_TRANSIT AMT.: 10 9‘v d.70 — 10) 96)5 �/A 3o5 ) �. I:TIFWKST.DOC (DST) EFF: 07-01-98 • i AlI'ACHMENT 7 • MUI/; ON RECEIVED ARCHITECTS DEC131999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMLPII BELLEVUE SEATTLE • 9 December 1999 PORTLAND IRVINE STERLING Debbie Adamski Development Services Technician • BOSTON City of Tigard • • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 • Re: Costco Wholesale -Tigard 7805 SW Dartmouth • Tigard, OR 97233 Project Number: 95-184 D . Subject: Traffic Impact Fee PC Number: 11-23C BUP Number: 99-00497 Dear Ms. Adamski: • • • Enclosed,is the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF)Appeal for the addition to the existing Costco • • Warehouse in Tigard, Oregon. Upon'receipt of the revised TIF decision on 12/6/99, we • are pursuing a petition for review(appeal). The basis of this appeal is based on the Land Use Category utilized by Washington County. Currently, we are.being assessed with the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)Trip Generation category 815— Discount Stores. Under this category, we are being assessed a trip`rate of 70.16 per 1,000 S.F., and being charged a•fee of$37,270.00. We are requesting that the assessment be changed from the current ITE Category 815 — Discount Stores to ITE category 861 — Discount Club. Under this category;our assessed • trip rate would be changed to 41.8 per 1,000 S.F., and the revised fee would be $22,202.00. This new assessment would provide a significant fee reduction for our client. Mulvonny Architects—Professional Service Corporation • 11820 Northup Way, #E300 Bellevue, WA 98005 Tel: 425.822.0444 Fox: 425.822.4129 www.mulvanny.com • • Costco Wholesale -Tigard 9 December 1999 Page 2 of 2 All Department communication and correspondence regarding the petition/appeal should be directed to the Mulvanny Architects office at the below address, attention Ken Kroeger. I am acting as the Project Manager of the Costco Tigard Warehouse addition. My role includes all steps of permitting, including the TIF appeal, Construction Documentation, and Construction Administration. Enclosed you will find the $638.00 fee for the appeal, copy of the TIF letter, and the altered TIF Worksheet. Should you require any additional information regarding this matter, please contact me at (425) 602-8823. Thank you. Sincerely, MULVANNY ARCHITECTS Ken roeger Pro ect Manager kk Enclosure h:costco\95\95-184\corrltifappeal.doc Kale% Nh -511ce`t.ae° A6�R04.a p 1 tp' V kI 'C- •• 0,l c�,�{'GI,�, wwv� r•c eri�5 c�1w1 vti1 w�- use-, �.c ) (U� 1' Co `YMwT i s �o�{,. ' ... ��� G- t w tc �•-�- -• "Spe c16.1L I ^ . vu, • Gtfi =, �. — 1e ire wV-, • k.A"kn,1 a So ,.k. MU LVAONY ARCHITECTS • wea,22-, ihto Ae-0"4-44, STAFF REPORT .!a ,ul'���, CITY OF TIGARD CASEFILE NO.: 99-581-APPEAL (TIF) OREGON PROCEDURE TYPE: III APPLICANT: Ken Kroeger Mulvanny Architects 11820 Northup Way. E300 Bellevue, WA 98005 OWNER: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Costco Wholesale - Tigard ASSESSOR MAP#: 1S1 36CD 7805 SW Dartmouth Street Lot#: 2200 Tigard, OR 97223 Site Size: 4.39 AC Address: 7805 SW Dartmouth Street Tigard, OR 97223 ZONE CLASSIFICATION.. CG PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ACTION: Appeal of Traffic Impact Fee Assessment for a Discount Store use in a General Commercial Zone. I. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: A. Resolution No. 94-18, authorizing the administration of the Washington County Traffic Impact Fee in the City of Tigard effective April 12, 1994. B. Ordinance 379 - Countywide Traffic Impact Fee Section 3.17.050 Amount II. FINDINGS: A. Background 1. On November 4, 1990, Washington County voters approved Ordinance 379, adopting the County-wide Traffic Impact Fee. This action placed into effect an expanded tax on all new development in Washington County including incorporated cities. Appendix "A" of this ordinance (see Attachment 1) sets the trip rates for land uses and is based on trip rates 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD(503) 684-2772 . • 99-581-APPEAL (TIF) • PAGE2 . found in the Fourth Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. Resolution No. 94-18 was introduced and passed by the Tigard City Council on April 12, 1994. 2. On June 3, 1999, the City granted approval for a Minor Modification that would allow a 10,416 square foot addition to the applicant's building. (see Attachment 2). 3. On November 8, 1999, the applicant made application to the City for a • building permit for the building addition on the subject site (see Attachment 3). 4. Consistent with Section 3.17.050 (Amount) of the TIF Ordinance (see Attachment 4) and Section II.A and B in the TIF Procedures Manual (see Attachment 5), the City calculated the Traffic Impact Fee by using Land Use Category 815 (Discount Store), as defined in Ordinance No. 379, Appendix "A". The average weekday trip identified in the Ordinance was 70.16 trips per thousand gross square feet of new area. The TIF assessment (see Attachment 6) for the new building, based on a gross square footage of new building area of 10,416 square feet, was $37,270.00, and was calculated as follows: (10,416/1000) (70.16) = 730.79 trips (196.57) ($51.00/trip) = $37,270.00 • 5. The applicant is appealing the staffs assessment by asserting that the City should have used a trip rate for a "Discount Club", which is Land Use Category #861 in the Sixth Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual (see Attachment 7). The Sixth Edition ITE indicates a trip rate of 41.8 trips per thousand gross square feet of floor area. B. Ordinance No. 379 - Traffic Impact Fee 1. Section 3.17.050, Amount A. The amount of the tax due shall be determined by multiplying the following applicable dollar amount, adjusted as provided in subsection E of this section, by the number of average weekday trips • generated by the new development in accordance with the basis for trip determination set forth in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated herein. • 99-581-APPEAL (TIF) PAGE 3 Residential use $ 201 per average weekday trip Business and Commercial use $ 51 per average weekday trip Office use $ 184 per average weekday trip Industrial use $ 193 per average weekday trip Institutional use $ 83 per weighted average daily trip (NOTE: Adjusted rates effective July 1, 1999) B. In the event an identified use does not have a basis for trip • determination stated in Appendix A, i.e., not available, the director shall either: 1. Determine the trip generation based on the use listed in Appendix A most similar in traffic generation; or 2. At the election (and expense) of the applicant, consider actual trip generation of a same or similar use verified by a registered traffic engineer. In the event actual trip generation is utilized, the director may make such adjustments as he deems applicable in consideration of location, size and other appropriate factors in determining the average weekday trips. Section 3.17.050(A) requires the Director to determine which of the categories contained within Appendix A relates to the proposed development. Only in cases where a "basis for trip determination" is not listed (i.e. the trip rate is listed as "not available"), can the Director consider trip generation information from the applicant's traffic engineer. Section II.A of the TIF Procedures Manual states that the "most similar land use must be chosen from the list in Table 11.1. If there are questions regarding the appropriate land use description, the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual—4th Edition (source of the Table 11.1 values) may be consulted, however you MUST choose a use from those listed." The City, from knowledge of the existing use and review of the proposed construction plans for the building addition, made the determination that the proposed use falls within the Discount Store category. The City agrees that the definition of."Discount Club", as listed in the Sixth Edition of the ITE Manual, more closely relates to the applicant's business than the definition of "Discount Store". However, the City is forbidden to use the Discount Club trip rate because that use is not listed among the uses in Table 11.1 of the Procedures Manual (Appendix A of the Ordinance). The Discount Store category is most similar to the applicant's business, and selection of this category complies with Section 3.17.050(A) of the TIF Ordinance and is required by Sections II.A and B of the Procedures Manual. O 99-581-APPEAL (TIF) PAGE 4 As stated previously, Appendix A of the TIF Ordinance provides information related to the "basis for trip determination". Most categories have a basis for trip determination related to gross square feet of building area. More specifically, the number of trips assessed to a discount store use is figured by multiplying the indicated weekday average trip rate by the number of"thousands" of gross square feet (TGSF) there are in the building. In the applicant's example, the proposed building addition is to be 10,416 square feet. The Discount Store trip rate is 70.16 trips per thousand gross square feet per day. Therefore, the number of trips was calculated as follows: 10.416 X 70.16 = 730.79 trips. The City clearly followed the procedure provided by the TIF Ordinance. III. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above findings, Staff recommends denial of the appeal. • V. ATTACHMENTS 1. Appendix "A" from the Washington County TIF Ordinance No. 379. 2. City approval of Minor Modification, dated June 3, 1999. 3. Applicant's building permit application, dated November 23, 1999. 4. Section 3.17.050 from the Washington County TIF Ordinance No. 379. 5. Sections II.A and B from the TIF Procedures Manual. 6. City assessment of applicant's TIF, dated December 6, 1999.•7. Letter of appeal from applicant, dated December 9, 1999. • \\tig333\usr\depts\eng\brianNeports\costco-2000-tifa ppeal-report.doc • arTACHMENT 1 Washington County Code 3.17 Appx.A --- APPENDIX A WEEKDAY WEEKEND LAND USE BASIS FOR TRIP AVERAGE AVERAGE CATEGORY/DESCRIPTION DETERMINATION TRIP RATE TRIP RATE Residential 210-Single-Family Detached Housing Number of Units 10.0 220-Apartment 6.10 • 221-Low-Rise Apartment " " " 6.60 222-High-Rise Apartment " " " 4.20 230-Residential Condominium " " " 5.85 231-Low-Rise Condominium Not Available * • 232-High-Rise Condominium Number of Units 4.18 . • 240-Mobile Home " " " 4.81 250-Retirement Community " " " 3.30 260-Recreational Home " " " 3.16 270-Planned Unit Development . (Residential) " " " 7.44 • Institutional 010-Waterports Ship Berths 100.003 * - 020-Airport Not Available * * 021-Commercial Airport Avg.Flights/Day 11.83 - * 022-General Aviation Airport " " " 3.06 * 030-Truck Terminals .T.G.S.F. 9.86 . 040-Railroad Terminal Not Available * * 410-Park Parking Spaces 7.58 11.82 411-City Park Acres 3.66 33.58 412-County Park Acres 2.11 2.26 413-State Park Acres 1.05 1.78 420-Marina Boat Berths 3.00 5.55 430-Golf Course Parking Spaces 6.62 5.95 440-Theater Not Available * 441-Live Theater " " * * 442=Music Theater " " * * 443-Movie Theater(sit down) Parking Spaces 6.19' 7.18' 444-Drive-In Theater Not Available * * 450-Stadium Parking Spaces 0.55 * 451-Baseball/Football Not Available * * • 452-Horse Race Parking Spaces 1.08 • * 453-Auto Race Not Available * * 454-Dog Race " " * * 460-Camp " " * * 491-Tennis Courts T.G.S.F. 32.93 • • 23.80 492-Racquet Clubs 15.94 23.85 501-Military Base Number of Employees 1.78 * 510-Preschool Not Available * * 520-Elementary School Number of Students 1.03 * 530-High School " " " 1.39 * 540-Junior/Community College , 11 " 11 1.55 * (Washington County 11-98) i • !. • Washington County Code 3.17 Appx.A WEEKDAY WEEKEND LAND USE BASIS FOR TRIP AVERAGE AVERAGE CATEGORY/DESCRIPTION DETERMINATION TRIP RATE TRIP RATE 550—University Number of Students 2.41 * 560—Church T.G.S.F. 7.70 18.18 565—Day Care Center - 0 67.00 6.15 570—Court Not Available * * 571—Prison 4 " " * * 580—Museum/Gallery " " * * , 590—Library T.G.S.F. 45.50 25.39 610—Hospital T.G.S.F. 16.69 11.29 620—Nursing Home Number of Beds 2.60 2.26 Business and Commercial - 310—Hotel Number of Rooms 8.70 320'—Motel 10.19 330—Resort Hotel ,, ,, .. 18.40 - 810—Retail-General Not Available * Merchandise 811—Specialty Store " " * 812—Building Materials/Lumber T.G.S.F. 30.56 813—Lumber Not Available * 814—Specialty Retail Center T.G.L.S.F. 40.68 815—Discount Stores 70.16 816—Hardware/Paint Store T.G.S.F. 53.21 817—Nursery " 36.17 820A—Shopping Center under 50,000 Gr.Sq.Ft. T.G.L.S.F. 94.71 820B—Shopping Center 50,000- 99,999 Gr.Sq.Ft. T.GZ_S:F. 84.512 820C—Shopping Center 100,000- 199,999 Gr.Sq.Ft. 66.622 820D—Shopping Center 200,000- - 299,999 Gr.Sq.Ft. 53.622 820E—Shopping Center 300,000- 399,999 Gr.Sq.Ft. " 45.662 820F—Shopping Center 400,000- 499,999 Gr.Sq.Ft. 41.412 820G—Shopping Center 500,000- 999,999 Gr.Sq.Ft. 36.632 82011—Shopping Center 1,000,000- 1,200,000 Gr.Sq.Ft. 32.822 8201—Shopping Center Over 1,200,000 Gr.Sq.Ft. 32.382 831—Quality Restaurant T.G.S.F. 95.622 832—High-Turnover,Sit-Down . Restaurant 100.003 833—Drive-In Restaurant 100.003 834—Drinking Place Not Available * 841—New Car Sale T.G.S.F. 47.52 842—Used Car Sale Not Available * (Washington County 11-98) 1111 IP Washington County Code 3.17 Appx.A WEEKDAY WEEKEND LAND USE BASIS FOR TRIP AVERAGE AVERAGE CATEGORY/DESCRIPTION DETERMINATION TRIP RATE TRIP RATE 843—Auto Parts Sale Not Available 844—Service Station No.of Pumps 100.003 845—Tire,Battery and Accessory Not Available 846.—Car Wash Not Available 847—Auto Repair Not Available 848—Highway Oasis(including truck fuel, minimal trucker and mechanical services) " " 849—Truck Stop(including food,auto and truck mechanical services, • trucker supplies and trucker overnight sleeping accommodations) Not Available 850—Supermarket T.G.S.F. 100.003 851—Convenience Market II 100.003 870—Apparel " " 3.33 890—Furniture Store 4.35 895—Video Arcade 9.60 911—Bank(walk-in) " It 100.003 912—Drive-In Bank . " " 100.003 913—Savings and Loan(walk-in) " " 61.00 914—Drive-In Savings and Loan If " " 100.003 Office 6'30_Clinic T.G.S.F. 23.79 710A—General Office,Under 100,000 Gross Square Feet(G.S.F.) " 16.31 710B—General Office, 100,000- 199,999 G.S.F. 12.40 710C—General Office,200,000- 299,999 G.S.F. 11.54 710D—General Office,300,000- 399,999 G.S.F. 10.425 710E—General Office,400,000- 499,999 G.S.F. 9.705 710F—General Office,500,000- 599,999 G.S.F. 9.175 710G—General Office,600,000- 699,999 G.S.F. 8.775 710H—General Office,700,000- 799,999 G.S.F. 8.435 7101—General Office,800,000 G.S.F.and Over 8.165 714—Corporate Headquarters Bldg. 7.015 720—Medical Office Building 34.17 (Washington County 11-98) • • • Washington County Code 3.17 Appx.A • WEEKDAY WEEKEND LAND USE BASIS FOR TRIP AVERAGE AVERAGE CATEGORY/DESCRIPTION DETERMINATION TRIP RATE TRIP RATE 730—Government Office Building T.G.S.F. 68.93 731—State Motor Vehicles Department 16.60 732—U.S.Post Office 0 86.78 740—Civic Center " " 25.00 750—Office Park USE General Office 760—Research Center T.G.S.F. 6.09 770—Business Park 12.42 910—Financial Not Available 915—Stockbroker 916—Lending Agency " " 920—Real Estate " " 930—Insurance T.G.S.F. 11.45 Industrial 110—General Light Industrial T.G.S.F. 6.97 120—General Heavy Industrial 1.50 130—Industrial Park 6.97 140—Manufacturing 3.85 150—Warehouse 4.88 151—Mini-Warehouse 2.61 170—Utilities Employees 1.07 180—Agricultural Not Available 860—Wholesale T.G.S.F. 6.73 NOTES * Not Available-Indicates that the ITE manual does not contain information for this use.Therefore,the basis for trip determination shall be as set forth in Section 3.17.040(D). I Without Matinees 2 Note:Rate obtained by taking average of maximum and minimum rates of range 3 Note:Rate capped at 100.00 • Note:Category may be used for permits submitted after January 15.1996 . 5 Categories may be used for permits submitted after the effective date of Ordinance 514,and for permits submitted on or after December 1,1996,and for which a TIF appeal was filed by October 1,1997. TGSF-Thousand Gross Square Feet TGLSF-Thousand Gross Leasable Square Feet (Washington County 11-98) •TTACHMENT 2 June 3, 1999 r444„1„114PA� CITY OF 11GARD Costco Wholesale Attn. Jackie Frank OREGON 999 Lake Drive Issaquah, WA 98027 RE: Tigard Costco Wholesale Expansion — Minor Modification Approval Dear Ms. Frank: This letter is in response to your request for Minor Modifi ion approval to the existing Costco Wholesale site (approved under SDR 93-000 Final Order No. 93- 17PC). The property is located at 7850 SW Dartmouth (WCT 1S1 36CD, Tax Lot 2200). The existing site includes a 135,404 square foot building with 742 parking stalls. The proposed modification includes a 10,416 square foot building addition and reconfiguration of the parking lot from an angled layout to a perpendicular layout. This will yield a net increase of five parking spaces for a total of 747 stalls. The proposal will continue to meet or exceed the landscaping requirements of the original site development approval. This property is zoned General Commercial (C-G) in which a retail use is permitted. The Tigard Community Development Code Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, provides that a modification to an approved site plan may be a Major or a Minor Modification. Major Modifications are processed as a new Site Development Review application. Section 18.360.050.B states that the Director shall determine that a Major Modification will result if one (1) or more of the following changes are proposed: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density, .or lot coverage for residential development; 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units; 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765; 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code; 5. An increase in the height of the building by more than 20 percent; 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected; 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day; • 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a non-residential use by more than 10 percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet; 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space by more than 10 percent; 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 . Page 1 of 2 • I 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening, and/or landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10 percent where specified in the site plan; 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that are not the subject of criteria (B) 1 through 10 above; Staff has reviewed your submittal, which includes site plans and building • elevations prepared by Mulvanny Architects, a letter addressing vehicle trip generation prepared by Kittelson and Associates, and an analysis and findings prepared by WRG Design. With respect to the criteria listed above, staff concurs that the proposed expansion is a Minor Modification. Based on the analysis provided by WRG Design, the Director has approved this Minor Modification request subject to the original conditions of approval of Final Order No. 93-17PC. The proposed findings prepared by WRG Design are incorporated herein by reference as the basis for this decision. With respect to the transportation system within the Tigard Triangle, the City appreciates Costco's offer to contribute $14,667 toward the much needed intersection improvements at 72nd Avenue/Dartmouth, and 68th Avenue/Dartmouth. Although the contribution is not a requirement for development or a condition of this approval, Staff agrees that the proposed sum • is consistent with recent assessments on development projects in this area of the Triangle. • Please submit a copy of this letter with your application for site and building permits. If you have any further questions regarding this decision, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x315. Sincerely, Mark J. Roberts Associate Planner i:\curpin\mark\minmoci\costco.doc c: Glenn Hirai, Mulvanny Architects Jennifer Snyder, WRG Design Planning Case File SDR 93-00018 1999 Planning Correspondence File MM D1999-00002 6/3/99 Jackie Frank,Costco Wholesale Letter Page 2 of 2 Re: Costco Expansion Minor Modification Approval • • Sent By: RG DESIGN INC. ; 503 603 9944; Aug-1 #1'IT'ACHMEN'II' 3 TY'OF ',GSD Commerrl Building,Permit Appaieritio Plan Check ft -Z5(—' 1125 SW ALL 'LVD. New Construction and Additions Recd By Date Recd 1- • GARD, OR \13' Date to P.F. - 9 03) 6394171 Data to Dsr Print or Type • Permit g eit,tPt999-475V97 • / T qq Incomplete or Illegible applications will not be accepted Related « `✓1 l p/ I / a#A j Called A - tj 0“..1.. 0-04. .. ... Name of Development/Project Job GD`- rC ' W Ocp nOSt� Existing Building ls' New Building ❑ Address Street Address Suite l0 sw w -tPoi-Th Building • . Bldg# I City/State Zip • Data ITl4fhd--0 n'-- 912?,3 Existing Use of Building Pro 9 or Property: Name / Property C•c -- r'Lo w libt_; Its;L-f.- . Owner Mailing Address suite Proposed Use of Building or Property: ( °1°lc1 1-- -e-- Vtz-N t., — .-- �-.kl tr SA' �S City/State Zip Phone No. f Stories: SS f%l e. $0 1 Occupant Name Sq. Ft. Of Project C-ore-o l,t-kiV-NID MO 12u}Cwt`") 1'0 l x{-1(0(kDo Lp 0.-1) • Name Occupancy Class(es) Contractor , KO/3il'1Sov-■ C:,.; 1.roil V7-2 (ti-Ar. pOsV— _l _�Tlez•�s��) Prior to permit Mailing Address Suite • Type(s)of Construction - ssuance,a copy of an licenses �/3.6b. it iv 1,1 of D r V-1-1 .{'–U t- `( -va1C_t , e2 are required II City/State Zip Phone Will this project have a Fire Suppression System? .xpeed in C.O.T. Yes No database rt,ii database OK_ g-I tIl b`�5-8531 13 Li Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)c k yea Oregon Const.Cont.Board Lie.* Ecp-Dal �� (A ) p f` 9 Valuation X 25% =,$ Participation Lo 3 I y7 i I g a°°a . Complete Accessibility Form Name. Architect Project $ ( 1 to ip 2 l o2c . �g tslpc,�N.' -( pt-� fi�c.t-' Valuation �1/j►1 Mailing Address Suite ((\ 1 11at° 1fig- 14UP ( f-30o I Plans Required: See Matrix for number of sets to submit r'ti GitylSlato Zip Phone on back `b __ - .maw 61.6 : •o •• _ - Engineer Name • I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application,that the information • V V-1- 1G " S aC--- given is correct,that I am the owner or authorized agent of the owner,and A. �F Mailing Address Suite �� that plans submitted are in compliance with Oregon State Laws. to s p\ �F109 W� ;�1✓ Signet re of�2wner/Agent Date v City/State Zip Phone • � �� _ l tAAtv 1 1 t 5 (ZRo ro C on�act P--."'"f"Name Pho.a ,dicate type of work: New 0 ddition* Demolition O >/ f-1- �� C42 )/g02-e023 scessory Stnrcturo 0 Foundation Only 0 �leralion Repair 0 Other 0 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY - ascription of work: p QP 1-11 o•L M O N Sg z4 t✓ ATS9 Map1 • .t T coo[X-R, T7°rue. of 004-e-- Poo�,-y1DIz/�i�/pt/rokl� . 6 ZZOO • L �/Y I� � . QOM,Gt1!ti'Ewl tor1SSi�t'L/ T1'��W1 , �s�r 14 a, J A Notes: r 1 '—N'C1N' "�CVrVI .: arks: E timated rM of Employovs I i l TIF://--/G_95 RLt % 4 - c , /tie-�,n.L� (A,-.2 w-� �/ nS / �i.�,�.1 a � the 0,4d owe figure is not supplied p at tllel time f application,rho dt will a-,--%,'";}��` C / L.:4„,„;—",:„._: 9 PP Y / �i tt�R ,� _ i f..:. a, .i.� --. :elate the fee based upon the number of parking spaces. 'C.t /ty .J ,/-..4 :._rt' _/-t./';r_,- a. c:.,' iG% Tc." : Site Work Permit Application must precede or accompany Building tit Application h1-6 ,31-gp 664. / Pi 3i /. 43 34.gd- % . FLS 2247. 34 l?44d- • ATTACHMENT 4 Washington County Code 3.17.040 6. Development not subject to this chapter pursuant to Section 117.160; 7. A transit improvement which has the impact of removing vehicle trips or reducing vehicle miles of travel on the county's major roadway system,as approved by the director. 8. Construction, remodeling or expansion of federal or state facilities otherwise exempt from taxation by counties. (Ord.379 §3(Exhibit A(part)), 1990) 3.17.050 Amount. A. The amount of the tax due shall be determined by multiplying the following applicable dollar amount, adjusted as provided in subsection E of this section,by the number of average weekday trips generated by the new development in accordance with the basis for trip determination set forth in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated herein. Residential use $135 per average weekday trip Business and Commercial use $ 34 per average weekday trip Office use $124 per average weekday trip Industrial use $130 per average weekday trip Institutional use $ 56 per weighted average daily trip The amount of the traffic impact fee for institutional uses shall be based on the weighted average daily calculated as follows: (average weekday trip rate x 5)+(average weekend trip x 2) 7 •B. In the event an identified use does not have a basis for trip determination stated in Appendix A,i.e., not available, the director shall either: 1. . Determine the trip generation based on the use listed in Appendix A most similar in traffic generation;or 2. At the election(and expense)of the applicant,consider actual trip generation of a same or similar use verified by a registered traffic engineer. In the event actual trip generation is utilized, the director may make such adjustments as he deems applicable in consideration of location,size and other appropriate factors in determining the average weekday trip. C. It is recognized that single structures may include more than one use. In such event the director for purposes of establishing the traffic impact fee shall proportion the uses accordingly. D. The applicant shall, at the time of application for a building permit, provide the department with necessary and applicable information, such as the type of use, number of employees or square footage of structures, necessary to cal- culate the traffic impact fee. E. Notwithstanding any other provision,the dollar amounts set forth in subsection A of this section shall on May 1st of each year be computed to increase automatically by six percent unless the board of commissioners of the county first determines that the construction cost index is a more accurate estimate of the increase or decrease in construction costs. Upon such a determination,the amounts set forth in subsection A of this section shall be increased or decreased by the average percentage fluctuation of the construction cost index over the previous ten years.In no event,however,shall there be an annual increase in the excess of six percent. Notwithstanding the-foregoing;all calculations'shall fie carried out to, the hundredths.place.A final product ending in$0.49 or less,shall-be rounded downftcl the nearest_dollar,f$0.50 or more up, to the next dollar: F. The construction cost index for 1986 and subsequent years shall be prepared by an Oregon registered professional engineer employed or retained by the county.The index shall be prepared in accordance with the formula set forth in Ap- pendix B and generally accepted construction cost indexing standards. The Oregon Highway Composite Construction Cost Index for the fourth quarter of 1985,attached to the ordinance codified in this chapter and by this reference incor- porated herein as Appendix C,is adopted as the composite index for the years 1975 through 1985 to be used in computing the average percentage increase or decrease over the previous ten years. G. Washington County promptly shall notify each city in writing of the increase or decrease. The adjustment to the dollar amount as described above apply to all building permit applications accepted for review on or after July 1st, by the county or city having jurisdiction over the development (Washington County 11-98) • • r Washington County Code 3.17.050 H. "The decision of the board, including the accuracy of the construction cost index and its application, shall be reviewable solely under ORS 34.010 through 34.100,relating to writs of review,in the Circuit Court in the county. (Ord. 379§3(Exhibit A(part)), 1990) 3.17.060 Payment. A. Unless deferred,the tax imposed is due and payable at the time of issuance of a building permit by the county or city.Except as otherwise provided in this chapter,no building permit shall be issued for a development subject to this tax unless the tax is first paid in full. B. Notwithstanding subsection A of this section, in those cases where the amount due for any one building permit exceeds five thousand dollars,the applicant may request a payment deferral. The request must be made in writing to the director no later than the time of application for a building permit The director shall grant deferral to the traffic impact fee,however,any traffic impact fee shall be paid in full prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit The amount of TIF due on deferred obligations shall be the amount in effect at the time of issuance of the occupancy permit Deferred TIF obligations shall not be eligible for internal financing or bancrofting as provided in subsection C unless so requested at the time of application for deferral.Selection of the credit or offset option must be made at the time of application for deferral. Failure to specify shall be deemed to be selection of the credit option.The selection is irrevocable. C. Any traffic impact fee may be eligible for internal financing or a bancrofting agreement pursuant to ORS 223.205 through 223.785,the Bancroft Bonding Act or any adopted city process.Bancrofting and installment payment agreements, as allowed herein,shall be limited in term in the following manner:. Traffic impact fee through$1,000 ' 3 years Traffic impact fee from$1,001 through$5,000 5 years Traffic impact fee$5,001 and more 10 years Any installment or bancroft agreement provided by this section shall have an interest rate as determined, at the time of the application, by the chief county or city financial officer and in recognition of the then current market rates and costs associated with the administration of such agreements.Applications for an agreement,as provided in this chapter,must be made at the time of building permit application,or occupancy permit if permitted pursuant to subsection B of this section. No applications made subsequent to issuance of the building permit,or occupancy permit if allowed by subsection B of this section,shall be considered.Any traffic impact fee using an agreement shall be a lien pursuant to ORS 223.230 or city provision.No offset shall be allowed for any tax satisfied through use of an agreement provided in this section. (Ord. 379 §3(Exhibit A(part)), 1990) 3.17.070 Credit. An applicant for a building permit,or occupancy permit if deferral has been granted,shall be entitled to a credit against the tax for constructing eligible capital improvements as defined herein. A. An extra capacity road or transit improvement is eligible for credit provided it meets all of the following: 1. With the exception of eligible transit improvements, the improvement must be on a facility designated as an arterial or collector facility in the base report,adopted as Appendix D as part of the ordinance codified in this chapter,and incorporated as if fully set forth herein. 2. The improvement must be designed and constructed to provide additional capacity to meet projected future transportation needs.Improvements that address capacity deficiencies existing at the time of development are not eligible. In the case of improvements addressing both,only that portion providing future capacity is eligible;and 3. The director determines that the timing, location, design and scope of proposed improvement is consistent with and furthers the objectives of the capital improvements program of the jurisdiction and,either; 4. a.The improvement is required to fulfill conditions of development approval issued by the jurisdiction with land use decision making authority;or b. The improvement is within the impact area of the development. For purposes of this section, impact area is that geographic area determined by the director in which the estimated traffic to be generated by the development exceeds ten percent of the existing average daily traffic. Existing traffic volumes shall be those observed within six months prior to filing the development application,adjusted for daily and seasonal traffic variations using factors provided by the director. B. A road or transit improvement constructed to address a safety hazard is eligible for credit if it meets the following: (Washington County 11-98) • • ASTACHMENT 5 IMandatory Procedure/Ordinance I Mandatory Procedure/Countywide (see Pape VIII-1 for explanation) . II. TIF CALCULATION The Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is based on the amount of new traffic expected to be generated by a developing property. This section describes the methodology for calculating the trip generation and Traffic Impact Fee. The basic formulas are discussed and examples provided: Explanations are also included for situations where the trip rate for a specific land use is not available, and when a specific land use is not listed in the Ordinance. The first step in calculating the TIF for a developing project is to determine the most appropriate Land Use Category. This category determines which TIF formula is used. Section II.A covers Residential, Business &Commercial, Industrial, and Office uses. Section II.0 explains the process for Institutional uses. A worksheet for TIF calculations is also included. ti II.A. RESIDENTIAL. BUSINESS & COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL. AND OFFICE USES. The Trip Rates for the above four land use categories are identified in the TIF Ordinance. Determining the land use description is the key step in this process. Land uses and their corresponding values are provided in Table 11.1. (Appendix A of the TIF Ordinance).. The most similar land use must be chosen from the list in Table 11.1. If there are questions regarding the appropriate land use description, the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual -4th Edition (source of the Table 11.1 values) may be consulted,however you MUST choose a use from those listed. The TIF is calculated using a formula with three (3)variables: WEEKDAY AVERAGE TRIPS X UNITS .X TRIP RATE = TIF • The WEEKDAY AVERAGE TRIPS is a value representing an average of the number of trips per unit for each land use type. This value was set by the TIF Ordinance for most land uses and is provided in Table 11.1. (For those uses where an Weekday Average Trip rate is not provided, please refer to Section II.E). • The UNITS value is determined by the developing project's size. The type of units is set for each land use in Table 11.1 and is typically expressed as Thousand Gross Square Feet, #of Units, # of Employees, etc. This value, multiplied with the Weekday Average Trips, determines the estimated trip generation of a project. ▪ The TRIP RATE value is set by the TIF Ordinance (Section 3.17.050) and may be adjusted on a yearly basis. The rates vary according to the land use category and are set as follows: II-1 • • Mandatory Procedure/Ordinance Mandatory Procedure/Countywide (see Pape VIII-1 for explanation) • TIF Trip Rates (Effective July 1, 1999 June 30, 2000) Residential Use $201.00 per average weekday trip Business and Commercial Use $ 51.00 per average weekday trip Office Use $184.00 per average weekday trip Industrial Use $193.00 per average weekday trip- Institutional Use $ 83.00 per weighted average daily trip A sample °Countywide Traffic Impact Fee Worksheet° is provided on the following page. This -worksheet must be used to calculate a development project's TIF for all but single-family residential homes. The completed worksheet shall be retained for official records. =. II.B. TIF CALCULATION EXAMPLES FOR RESIDENTIAL, BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND OFFICE USES The calculation is a simple multiplication of the three values (average weekday trips, units, and trip rates) listed on the previous page. -The following examples demonstrate TIF calculations: 1. Residential - • • a. 1 Single-family Residence ITE Category 210- 10.0 weekday average trips per unit 10.0 X 1 X$201.00=$2010.00 TIF (Project's trip generation: 10.0.X 1 = 10) b. 400 Unit Apartment Complex ITE Category 220- 6.1 weekday average trips per unit 6.1 X 400 X$201.00=$490,440.00 TIF (Project's trip generation: 6.1 X 400=2440) 2. Business and Commercial 57,000 sq ft Shopping Center (55,000 sq ft leasable space) •- ITE Category 821 -84.51 weekday average trips per TGLSF 84.51 X 55 X$51 = $237,050.55 TIF (Project's trip generation: 84.51 X 55.0= 4648.05) 11-2- • • S • DATE: PLANS CHECK NO.: • PROJECT TITLE: COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE APPLICANT: • WORKSHEET MAILING ADDRESS: (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) CITY/ZIP/PHONE: • RATE PER TAX MAP NO.: LAND USE CATEGORY TRIP SITUS NO.ADDRESS: RESIDENTIAL • $201.00 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $51.00 OFFICE $184.00 INDUSTRIAL $193.00. .. • INSTITUTIONAL $83.00 PAYMENT METHOD: CASH/CHECK CREDIT • INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: DEFER (PROMISSORY NOTE) LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF WWEEKDAYAVG.TRIP WEEKEND AVG.TRIP NER Y SRATE BASIS: • CALCULATIONS: • • PROJECT TRIP GENERATION: FEE: • FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: ROAD AMT.: TRANSIT AMT.: PREPARED BY: • 6/7/99 t:lshared\ping\wpshare scotkdiAprocedures manualworksheet 99-00.doc CC: WASHINGTON COUNTY TIF NOTEBOOK • • IMandatory Procedure/Ordinance I Mandatory Procedure/Countywide (see nacre VIII-1 for explanation) 3. Office 4,123 sq ft Medical Clinic ITE Category 630:-23.79 weekday average trips per TGSF 23.79 X 4.123 X$184.00= $18,048.56 . (Project's trip generation: 23.79 X 4.123 = 98.09) 4. Industrial 72,401 sq ft Industrial Building (part of an approved Industrial Park) ITE Category 130- 6.97 weekday average trips per TGSF- • • 6.97 X 72.401 X$193.00= $97,393.59 (Project's trip generation: 6.97 X 72.401 =504.63) 5., Multiple Use Building 400 room Hotel, 5,100 sq ft Quality Restaurant, and 20,000 sq ft Office space. ITE Category 310 (Hotel) -8.70.weekday average trips per room ITE Category 831 (Quality Restaurant) - 95.62 weekday average trips per TGSF ITE Category 711 (Office) - 16.31 weekday average trips per TGSF 8.70 X 400 X $ 51.00=$177,480.00 TIF 95.62 X 5.1 X$ 51.00=$ 24,870.76 TIF . 16.31 X 20 X$184.00= $ 60,020.80 TIF Total project TIF=$262,371.56 [Project's trip generation = (8.7 X 400)+(95.62 X 5.1)+(16.31 X 20) = 4293.86] II.C. INSTITUTIONAL USES Institutional uses are treated differently to reflect traffic generated on a full seven day week basis rather than just the five day work week. As with the above land uses, institutional uses are calculated based on the estimated project trip generation of the use and the trip rate set by the ordinance. The TIF formula is: WEIGHTED AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS X UNITS X TRIP RATE = TIF The WEIGHTED AVERAGE DAILY TRIP,value also includes weekend trips to take into account the inherent differences between weekend trip generation and weekday trip generation for institutional uses. The method for calculating the weighted average for institutional uses was set in section 3.17.050 of the Ordinance. Using the weekday and weekend institutional trip rates found in Table 11.1, the Weighted Average Daily Trips can be calculated for an average week with the following formula: (WEEKDAY AVE. TRIP X 5) + (WEEKEND AVE. TRIP X 2) = WEIGHTED AVE. 7 DAILY TRIPS 11-4 • . 4TTACHMENT 6 DATE: �a- �±. PLANS CHECK NO. //_,R.5 PROJECT TITLE: (� COUNTYWIDE £oa76fo 4)/4 /bus Aar, r o,� TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE WORKSHEET uc as - -?8a3) (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES). m ` !` fQu P CUB y spo CITY/ZIP/PHONE: Zi CLE. w^A' SOD S TAX MAP NO.:/S/ ,get)06 _0Agoo SITES NO.ADO SS: LAND USE CATEGORY RATE PER TRIP 6 S gW -1..)A kr1-/o u77-/ RESIDENTIAL $201.00 . BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL,,e 5 0 ) OFFICE $ 184.00 INDUSTRIAL $ 193.00 ' c INSTITUTIONAL $ 83.00 PAYMENT METHOD: M)' 9 CASH/CHECK i e CREDIT ) 4/1p BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: DEFER TO OCCUPANCY LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF USE WEEKDAY VG. WEEKEND AVG.TRIP RATE (S ��c t(►JT o'"'rOPL 1 TRIP RATE 7O.''] BASIS APP? PRoiof A- !d, l !(O 0 tO To fw -K/ T/ x.)e . /3a, g940-72,,,,, • • CALCULATIONS: r041b x 76, f-c x .5l ! 41)37/ 70. a9 11'37 70 73o . 7 9 T QI P b PROJECT TR P`3GENERATION: 7 FEE: 4 7, 0 FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: • I-'- �, �.r5'`c'PUa 1 P 3I x 6 15 ,°° 101 gCv5 ROAD AMT:: 6 n j� S• 5 2 }3 _ �F'� TRANSIT AMT.:( r1� �i � I a7d - (' �) (0S — 0? 305 //F-MT�PRE� R f� `1� S I:TIFWKST.DOC (DST) EFF: 07-01-98 A"IitACHMENT 7 MIJIV' . . YRECEIVED ARCHITECTS DEC131999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPM01 • BELLEVUE SEATTLE 9 December 1999 PORTLAND IRVINE STERLING Debbie Adamski Development Services Technician BOSTON City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, OR 97223 • Re: • Costco Wholesale -Tigard 7805 SW Dartmouth . Tigard, OR 97233 Project Number: 95-184 D • Subject: Traffic Impact Fee PC Number: 11-23C BUP Number: 99-00497 Dear Ms. Adamski: • Enclosed is the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF)Appeal for the addition to the existing Costco • Warehouse in Tigard, Oregon. Upon receipt of the revised TIF decision on 12/6/99, we • are.pursuing a petition for review (appeal). The basis of this appeal is based on the Land Use Category utilized by Washington County. Currently, we are being assessed with the.lnstitute•of Transportation Engineers (ITE)Trip Generation category 815— Discount Stores. Under this category, we are being• assessed a trip rate of 70.16 per 1,000 S.F., and being charged a fee of$37,270.00. • We are requesting that the assessment be changed from the current ITE Category 815— Discount Stores to ITE category 861 — Discount Club. Under this category, our assessed • trip rate would be changed to 41.8 per 1,000 S.F., and the revised fee would be $22,202.00. This new assessment would provide a significant fee reduction for our client. Mulvonny Architects—Professional Service Corporation 1 1820 Northup Way. #E300 Bellevue, WA 98005 Tel- 425.822.0444 Fox: 425.822.4129 www.mulvanny.com • • Costco Wholesale -Tigard 9 December 1999 Page2of2 All Department communication and correspondence regarding the petition/appeal should be directed to the Mulvanny Architects office at the below address, attention Ken Kroeger. I am acting as the Project Manager of the Costco Tigard Warehouse addition. My role • includes all steps of permitting, including the TIF appeal, Construction Documentation, and Construction Administration. Enclosed you will find the $638.00 fee for the appeal, copy of the TIF letter, and the altered TIF Worksheet. Should you require any additional information regarding this matter, please contact me at (425) 602-8823. Thank you. Sincerely, MULVANNY ARCHITECTS Ken roeger Pro ect Manager kk Enclosure h:\costco\95\95-184\coR\tifappeal.doc MU LVA( NY A R C H I T E C T S %//l,111�I II C ' Janua .3;2000 -' _ �i;dl .• ry: �I�y"'fir. aµ. _ . .', ' . : • . CITY OF::TIGARD Gary•:,Firestone , , • , ,:i . • -,� OREGON'" • ''F .._-O.'D„onnell:•Ramis 'I..: -.. ; .. :,;,•, - . ' ` : - 1727NW:Hoyt:Street ”•,: .a,-s." = , = '.,.,. _I¢ .Portland'OR. 97209 .f_, # _ _ ,, "• .2,. •`L^ e`~ -• •`�r'•� ri7::,-i".. 'tip` - -- iL'" '',,,,)'''''T'4:''=._ r:al="R_E:-_•;_,``-C.OSTC_O:WHOLESALE TIF APPEAL• ';L 17`.r,.r,,• '-- :i�•.�.C':i17i:t .., , . _ -1. , :`�x:' \ .. _ '';'`.'1.*,.-.'-t• '-rc•, , .•:;14 .i' ;;: V t-t•4__ 'n.c C S t'.5i.P •t" 4 ..1:-S.t•` j'i • FR. •`Yi• 1,,•-� '.5 r'. "•:•':-!T :1 .,r ,'i� •;'-' ,.1-: :.;ire -';' ',.' =_4 '. :i'• -5- r• .1: �Dea• �`Ga 5 y .r iio. i - 'y., st.• t-::" : . Enclosed�-m.4ie-follow ng[Jlinformation_related;;his crier:; .,, J '1'• ;z -'i' • c9::fx:.':?•c.n, rt_ } - .-.r,,, ;sr-' t.e r '- :E,L {r: 'M.'', ;r;. ,• '•, :1` fiIF::Pa'menYOption Form submitted b Cos co.on1''2/29/99:. ::r of l•c t�ti ,i n •�received.12/23/9 a' 5°: 4 :2 •# ,Notice;o ,.App ica io'r'''..',.'''ccepta ce / 9 (shows.tentative_ a 'eal;hearin 'date�• :2/17/2000 • '3. -Letter:from City toZlark Berry, dated 12/13/99. _ `r= - 4 ,-"-Appeal letter from'Costco, received.712/13/99. , 5, -Revised TIF-Calculation`:Worksheet„ dated.12/6/99•(Now:properly using`'_ ;; = "Discount Store" cate ory).• ..-.e-.:._ . •, :. - •6:`, . :`Transmittal from'�Mulvanny to City,,dated-12/2/99 • - • '7 ,,; ''. First:TIF Calculation Worksheet,:dated 1'1/23/99 (Note,.we made a. ! - :- :''�: ymistake°b, using "Shp• in Center"`cat ''o' - -. =8: T,i• . :Minor:ModificationA roval datedJune='3;:1999;(for:10,000•sf•addition . •=$ `':9: :`:-.SDR.93-0018/PDR;>93-0010:Final:Order onginal•:Costco•site approval)..: ` '” After�reviewing this information,'please let'me:know if you have any questions or :heed more information.. - . • r Sincerely, •. . • . . . •: .. '. . . - s:Brian':0 ,Rager, P' _ :,,>•:Development•Review Engineer-. . - • •• • - ' • \ . .- , - Enclosures • IAengtrlanrlcorrespondence costco\01012000-costcoliffirestone.doc 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 • 12/29/99 16:46 FAX MULVANNY ARCHITECTS 0 002/002 -5) E E - f'f:C 3-0 it . COUNTYWIDE Ey��oQ j IJ, 6� TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE co��°���° C OF �GARD PAYMENT OPTION FORM OREGON Date Site Address Lc��2E/bu�E �zm.Ta�J //-02,5 Project Name Plan Check It I realize that I must make a decision on payment of the Traffic Impart Fee(TIF) at this time. Therefore, I request the following(choose whichever option o r options are applicable): • . Cash or Check ElCredit Voucher • ElBancroft or Installment Payments • or • The Ordinance allows for deferral of payment of the TIF until issuance 'of the occupancy permit if the TIF is greater than S5,000, ]f the TIF meets this requirement,I also request this option. I understand the Tii must be paid prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. I also understand that the TIF will be recalculated based on the prevailing rates at the time of' payment. Please be advised that TIF rates may increase up to six percent each July 1st. This rate increase is not subject to appeal. jtl. OWNER/APP "ANT OWNER/APPLICAT T cc; Building Permit File Payment Option'Notebook 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 — i:\dsts\forms\tifsub.doc 9/8/99 12/29/99 16:46 FAX MULVANNY ARCHITECTS Cool/002 • _ `_ • • M U LVA Y TRANSMITTAL ARCHITECT S TO: . Ch/of Tigard DATE: 12/29/9) 13124 SW Hall Blvd PROJECT: Costco Wholesale Tigard, Or 97223 PROJECT NO: 95-1841) PHONE: _503-631)4171 FAX; 503-591-1960 ATTN: Debbie Adamski #PAGES: 2 SUBJECT: TIF FROM: Bill Cot nelly, Project Manager • WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: ❑ Express Delivery ❑ Mail ❑ Courier 0 Fax Only 12 Fax and Hard Copy ❑ Copy ❑ Original ❑ For Approval ❑ For Information/Use 0 For Review/Comn gent ❑ As Requested • Quantity: Date: Description: 1 11/23/99 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PAYMENT OPTION FORM • • • Notes: Original will be mailed. • • From: Bill Connelly c: Privileged and Confidential Information:The information in this facsimile is intended of ly for the use of the recipient -above named. Any wrongful review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this coma unication is strictly prohibited. If errors occur in transmission,or enclosures are not as noted,please notify us at once. E\PROJECTS\cOSTCO 95%5164\CorACiMTigard 122999.doc BELLEVUE SEATTLE PORTLAND STERLING BOSTON TAIPEI Mulvanny Architect) —Professional Service Carporotl„n 11820 Northup Way, #E300 Bellevue, WA 98005 Tel: 425.B22,044A Fax: 425,822,4129 •v...mulvonny.com • • WASHINGTON COUNTY RECEIVED 4111% Dept.of Land Use&Transportation 155 N. 1st Avenue,Hillsboro,OR 97124350 13 DEC 2 3 199 Ph.(503)846-8761 Fax(503)846-2908 J www.co.washington.or.us COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE TYPE II AND III LAND USE APPLICATIONS URBAN 12/21/99 Casefile No.: 99-581-APPEAL(TIF) APPLICANT: COSTCO WHOLESALE--TIGARD 7805 SW DARTMOUTH TIGARD, OR 97233 i�- E c 0 APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: KEN KROEGER DEC 2 7 1999 MULVANNY ARCHITECTS • 11820 NORTHUP WAY, E300 Ca a Y V)ti= 6 fo,:.- : . BELLEVUE, WA 98005 TYPE ll APPLICATION x. TYPE III APPLICATION, HEARING DATE: 2/17/00 (TENTATIVE) PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ACTION: TIF APPEAL This notice is to inform you that your application has been reviewed and determined to be complete. We will now begin the process of reviewing your application for conformance with the appropriate development standards. The expected review period for your request is 120 days. If adverse public comments are submitted, or if unforeseen problems are found during our review, additional time may be required to adequately address these issues. The project planner assigned this Casefile is CLARK BERRY, SENIOR PLANNER, for additional information, please contact him/her at 846-3876. You can check the status of your Casefile on the Washington County web page at the following link: http://www.co.washington.or.us/cfdocs/landevaccess/projpendstart.cfm NOTE FOR RURAL APPLICANTS ONLY: The Posting Requirements for posting a public notice sign on the site is enclosed. It is your responsibility to post the site as described in the Posting Requirements. If you did not obtain a posting sign when you submitted the application, please pick up a sign at our office. After the public notice sign has been posted, the completed affidavit of posting must be in our office by 5:00 p.m. on the date listed in the Posting Requirements. Failure to post the subject property and file an Affidavit Of Posting shall result in a denial of the application. • • r • • . 1999 7T;i DEC d OF TIGARD CITY OF TIGARD December 13, 1999 OREGON Clark Berry Planning Division 155 N First Ave Suite 350-14 Hillsboro OR 97124 RE: Appeal of Traffic Impact Fees for Costco Addition,7850 SW Dartmouth, Tigard, OR I'm forwarding to you the appeal notification letter and the check made out to Washington County for the appeal fee of$638.00. I have also enclosed a copy of my. original calculation dated November 23, 1999 and the recalculation that Brian Rager requested I do on December 6, 1999. If you require any other assistance in this matter,please contact me at 639-4171, extension 410. • -1y, 0-CIAlkAikt:t ebbie Adamski Development Services Technician C: Brian Rager • 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 • • MULVAIsiNY RECEIVED TRANSMITTAL ARCH I T E C T S DEC 31999 COMMUKIIY(>£V 1 TO: ?,. 1SAV*.`` "`` DATE: 12/13 " el6pine`' ' S' PROJECT: Costco Warehouse-Tigard • Y'13125 5W_Hall,Blvii. . . ,-t PROJECT NO 95-184D Tigard,OR 97223..— PHONE: 503.639.4171 FAX: 503.598.1960 ATTN: -.Debbie Adamski • l#PAGES many • RE: TIF Appeal • FROM: Ken Kroeger • WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: . ❑ Express Delivery ❑ Mail E Courier . ❑ Fax Only ❑ Fax and Hard Copy ❑ Copy ❑ Original E For Approval E Prints For Information/Use ❑ For Review/Comment ❑ As Requested Quantity: Date: Description: • 1 12/9 TIF appeal application letter 1 11/29 Inspection Services certification— .1;) ob. P. /A43/9'9 --a.h. 1 12/8 Appeal Check for Washington County-#11529 • Notes: Debbie: Thanks for your help. I am enclosing the TIF Appeal form and letter. Please'let me know if there is any additional information that you require. Ken • - • • • • • • • • BY: C: r•. ''roe•- - v Privileged and Confidential Information:The information in this facsimile is intended only for the use of the recipient above named. Any wrongful review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If errors occur in transmission,or enclosures are not as noted, please notify us at once. H:\COSTCO\95\95-184\Corntrans-TI GARD.doc BELLEVUE SEATTLE PORTLAND IRVINE STERLING BOSTON Mulvanny Architects Professional Service Corporation 11820 Northup Way. #E300 Bellevue. WA 98005 Tel: 425.822.0444 Fax: 425.822.4129 www.mulvanny.com • • • • n RECEIVED Mi I)NY_ ARCHITECTS , DEC131999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPM01 BELLEVUE SEATTLE 9 December 1999 PORTLAND IRVINE STERLING Debbie Adamski • Development Services Technician BOSTON City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Costco Wholesale -Tigard 7805 SW Dartmouth Tigard, OR 97233 Project Number: 95-184 D • Subject: Traffic Impact Fee PC Number: 11-23C BUP Number: 99-00497 • • Dear Ms. Adamski: • Enclosed is the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF)Appeal for the addition to the existing Costco Warehouse in Tigard, Oregon. Upon receipt of the revised TIF decision on 12/6/99, we are pursuing a petition for review (appeal). The basis of this appeal is based on the Land Use Category utilized by Washington County. Currently, we are being assessed with the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation category 815— Discount Stores. Under this category, we are being assessed a trip rate of 70.16 per 1,000 S.F., and being charged a fee of$37,270.00. We are requesting that the assessment be changed from the current ITE Category 815 — Discount Stores to ITE category 861 — Discount Club. Under this category, our assessed trip rate would be changed to 41.8 per 1,000 S.F., and the revised fee would be $22,202.00. This new assessment would provide a significant fee reduction for our client. • • Mulvanny Architects—Professional Service Corporation • 11820 Northup Way, #E300 Bellevue, WA 98005 Tel: 425.822.0444 Fax: 425.822.4129 www.mulvanny.com • • Costco Wholesale -Tigard 9 December 1999 Page 2 of 2 • All Department communication and correspondence regarding the petition/appeal should be directed to the Mulvanny Architects office at the below address, attention Ken Kroeger. I am acting as the Project Manager of the Costco Tigard Warehouse addition. My role includes all steps of permitting, including the TIF appeal, Construction Documentation, and Construction Administration. Enclosed you will find the $638.00 fee for the appeal, copy of the TIF letter, and the altered TIF Worksheet. Should you require any additional information regarding this matter, please contact me at (425) 602-8823. Thank you. Sincerely, MULVANNY ARCHITECTS Ken roeger Pro ect Manager kk Enclosure h:\costco\95\95-184\corc\tifappeal.doc MU LVAVY ARCHITECTS • i- DATE: 49_G _ �r PLANS CHECK NO. // Q n PROJECT TITLE: 7 of lJ COUNTYWIDE CoaTC/o &.,4 -t keu5-e. Ay?, 7-,--e A) TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE WORKSHEET - ' EL.10 Rao sa E 2. ( • as -Loa-8da3) (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) I �T�'�3AWMf2u P 1.04 y g 500 CITY/ZIP/PHONE:7Kut JCL eA..? , � .7 r n TAX MAP NO.:/S/ 8 C CD - o oO SITES NO.ADDR SS: '1 LAND USE CATEGORY RATE PER TRIP g SDt J 'D A 2TI >0 uT�7 RESIDENTIAL $2 7. BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL 51.00 OFFICE $ 184.00 INDUSTRIAL $ 193.00 INSTITUTIONAL $ 83.00 ' PAYMENT METHOD: %� ," CASH/CHECK CREDIT ) ` `1 BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) / ,o me/ "'° ¢� , INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: DEFER TO OCCUPANCY LAND USE CATEGORY 1 DESCRIPTION OF USE WEEKDAY AVG. WEEKEND AVG.TRIP RATE g I S .I j DtS�Q�t�J i o`�O�£S TRIP RATE 7©.I ' BASIS: P,Pp LA CA 1 yc - t•'' 3 D�a€..s A- lb, L{ 1 (p,,{ A?-,i7,T, b/0 To /}1J �x1 JTi 1.3e0 • /3a, aatIu., o? , CALCULATIONS: 4i,g d-, e �4 � 2212�- • X22 , 2.02 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION: '1.2,5. ?-,4 -� r.. q S s FEE: 27 9 • 2Z1 Z(Q2 J FOR�CCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: N, FY r2._ _ /5•`'°pea T21P - , • . x 6 1`5 •"' 6 I 5- .- 4- ROAD AMT.: 6 7 7F-C, z .v)3o- • J -7t- — --4-63-9) b.J J ` TRAN SIT AMT.: S I 'Mr/ �O).-71P • P R rnrn VI 2.7- , -01' ,,SZG _ . tcdtc.I6•?-- . • I:TIFWKST.DOC (DST) EFF: 07-01-98 • • iiaAm }'�COUNTYWIDE . J TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE CITY OF TIGAR� PAYMENT OPTION FORM OREGON Co-9 ? 7g5o "--DA2T0-1ouT Date Site Address Project Name Plan Check# I realize that I must make a decision on payment of the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) at this time. Therefore,I request the following(choose whichever option or options are applicable): Cash or Check Credit Voucher EBancroft or Installment Payments , or The Ordinance allows for deferral of payment of the TIF until issuance of the occupancy permit if the TIF is greater than $5,000. If the TIF meets this requirement,I also request this option. I understand the TIF must be paid prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. I also understand that the .TIF will be recalculated based on the prevailing rates at the time of payment. Please be advised that TIF rates may increase up to six percent each July 1st. This rate increase is not subject to appeal. LIC• r OWNER/APPLICANT cc: Building Permit File Payment Option Notebook 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 is\dsts\forms\tifsub.doc 9/8/99 DATE: fin_ PLANS CHECK NO. //-A5 PROJECT TITLE: . COUNTYWIDE C re0 4)A�.t• knu0-g- .4?:) , 7'76/0 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE WORKSHEET AppLICA" n�� oS.mE2 1- Lias -boa_-g8a3) (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) ,?116 �9� f 2u P Cully g fp , f . CITY/ZIP/PHONE:zf GLE du to4. 9��Q TAX MAP NO.:AS/ 34 /!D - c�aao© SITES NO.ADDR SS: C ' LAND USE CATEGORY RATE PER TRIP -7S50 6W -DA 11 T}--HQ al'Tfa RESIDENTIAL $21 Is 7 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL ', 51.00 OFFICE '. 184.00 INDUSTRIAL $ 193.00 . INSTITUTIONAL $ 83.001, p-i,--- t,„, ' PAYMENT METHOD: _ r �let,�' „,,,9j 1 . CASH/CHECK E, (.\ 1 e J CREDIT BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) Q p' INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: DEFER TO OCCUPANCY LAND I US E CATEGORY bDESORIUPTON O OE tiS TWEEKDAY AO, CO WEEKEND AVG.TRIP RATE BASIS: PPP►1CAQT h'(Z0N)E,5 /r- !0) t ?/..0* Pt-,7.1--;.,--1-- 6 t -1- '- �XI-T/ ,0.0 /3O, aall O),.\ o D , QQ • • CALCULATIONS: 10.4"1 x 76. ?-(.‘) x -1' • �' -- 02� a7u, . X 3 7 ;170 73o . 79-rk, Po . PROJECT R P`iGENERATION: FEE: _ 37,x70 FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY . ADDITIONAL NOTES: . Y--); P._a ,-, )5,G;a PE/2 T2, P -731x615 '°° = /v) 9105 . ROAD AMT.: j ) • } 2 )5 / Mr TRANSITAMT.:4 r O Q/ . - 1 P:-7 b — J v) � CDJ ,?1,0 30 s/ PRP I:TIFWKST.DOC (DST) EFF: 07-01-98 • • 1 AL December 6, 1999 • CITY OF TIGARD Ken Kroeger • OREGON Mulvanny Architects 11820 Northrup Way #E300 Bellevue WA 98005 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE FOR Costco Warehouse Addition, 7805 SW Dartmouth • Enclosed with this letter you will find a calculation sheet showing the computation that has been performed to determine the amount of the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) to be paid for the project noted above. The amount of the TIF is $37,270.00. You have three payment options available to you. The first is to pay the TIF at the time you are issued a building permit. The second is to arrange for payment over time by signing a promissory note (if you wish to exercise this second option please contact me for additional details). The third option is to defer payment until occupancy. Traffic impact fees are subject to an annual increase of up to 6% if not paid or financed prior to July 1st of each year. Please note that you may appeal the discretionary decisions made in determining the appropriate category and the amount of the fee based on that category. A notice of appeal must be received by the City Recorder no later than 5:00 p.m. on December 20, 1999 and must be accompanied by the $638.00 appeal fee required by Washington County. Although filed with the City Recorder, an appeal would be heard by the Washington County Hearings Officer. If you have any questions, or if I can be of further service, please contact me at 639- 4171 . Wtejoidik Debbie Adamski Development Services Technician c: TIF file Building file I:IOSTSVTF3.DOT 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 • • • • COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE Attila APPEAL INFORMATION CITY OF TIG \ EGo2) Attached is a copy of the Director's decision on this Traffic Impact Fee assessment or Traffic Impact Fee Credit/Offset request. This decision may be appealed and a public hearing held by filling a signed petition for review (appeal) within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date written notice is provided (date mailed). APPEAL PERIOD: .Date mailed: /eg—/,-95' to 5:00 PM on /A--,10-9Y Appeal Due Date A motion for reconsideration also may be filled within seven calendar days of the date written notice of the decision is provided (see Section 208 of the Washington County Community Development Code). A motion for reconsideration does not stop the appeal period(s) from running and is available only as an extraordinary remedy for when a mistake of law or fact has occurred. A motion for reconsideration requires a filling fee of$638.00. This decision will be final if an appeal is not filed by the due dates(s), and a motion for reconsideration is not granted by the Director. The complete file is available at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 for review. A petition for review (appeal) must contain the following: 1. The name of the applicant and the relevant casefile/building permit/other development permit number; 2. , The name and signature of the petitioner filing the petition for review (appeal). If a group consisting of more than one person is filing a single petition for review, one individual shall be designated as the group's representative for all contacts with the Department. All Department communications regarding the petition, including correspondence, shall be with this representative; 3. A statement of the interest of the petitioner; 4. The date the notice of decision was sent as specified in the notice; 5. The petition for review (appeal) shall state the relevant facts, applicable ordinance provisions, and relief sought; and 6. The fee of$638.00 for Director's decisions being appealed to the Washington County Hearings Officer. l information contact: j 12,t c �_�.d1� (.03)1/3,- 4/ 7/ X 1//e) • For further appeal 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 - I:kdst\tiappeal.doc • AA\ Augol COUNTYWIDE tk • --,iJ • TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE CITY OF TIGAR) PAYMENT OPTION FORM OREGON -9 ? 7g5o `D92-ri-lour Date Site Address Cowrzo !- /1-013e- Project Name Plan Check# I realize that I must make a decision on payment of the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) at this time. Therefore, I request the following (choose whichever option or options are applicable): LiCash or Check Credit Voucher Bancroft or Installment Payments or The Ordinance allows for deferral of payment of the TIF until issuance of the occupancy permit if the TIF is greater than $5,000. If the TIF meets this requirement, I also request this option. I understand the TIF must be paid prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. I also understand that the TIF will be recalculated based on the prevailing rates at the time of payment. Please be advised that TIF rates may increase up to six percent each July 1st. This rate increase is not subject to appeal. OWNER/APPLICANT OWNER/APPLICANT cc: Building Permit File Payment Option Notebook 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 i:\dsts\forms\tifsub.doc 9/8/99 12/02/99 THU 12: 54 FAX 2 MULVANNY ARCHITECTS E 001 • . r. -- • • ARCHIT ECTS TRANSMITTAL • TO: City of Tigard DATE: 12/2 Development Services PROJECT: Costco Warehouse-Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. PROJECT NO: 95-1840 Tigard,OR 97223 PHONE: 503.639.4171 FAX: 503.598.1960 ATTN: Debbie Adamski #PAGES 6 RE: TIF classification FROM: Ken Kroeger WE ARE SUNDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: • ❑ Express Delivery ❑ Mail ❑ Courier ® Fax Only ❑ Fax and Hard Copy ❑ Copy ❑ Original • ❑ For Appn ival ❑ Prints For Information/Use ® For Review/Comment ❑ As Requested Quantity: Date: Description: 1 TIF application letter 1 Institute of Transportation Engineers cut sheet • • Notes: Debbie: Thanks for our help. I am sending the classification that we thought we fall under. Also in calculating the fee, I believe:that Dartmouth falls under special consideration, and would reduce the fee further. Let me knob"when you receive this so we can discuss it. Thanks again.... • Ken • • • BY ' C: Kerr roeg r, PM • • Privileged aid Confidential Information:The information in this facsimile Is Intended only for the use of the recipient above nam::d. Any wrongful review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. It errors occur in transmission,or enclosures are not as noted,please notify us at once. H:\COSTCO19519:.•184\Con1trans-TIOARD.doc • BELLEVUE SEATTLE PORTLAND IRVINE STERLING BOSTON Mulvanny Architects Professional Service Corporation 11820 Nor th‘p Woy, #E300 Bellevue. WA 98005 Tel: 425.822.0444 Fax: 425.822.4129 www.mulvanny.com 12/02/99 THU 12: 55 FAX 2 MULVANNY ARCHITECTS LI002• F. . . ., , ..:., _____, ...„......., ,,,,....,„ ,„, . 1, . i /- f . Land Use: 820 Shopping Center ' !. PP 9 I. Des,:ription 1: A shopping center Is art integrated group of commercial establishments which is planned, devei ped,owned and managed as a unit. Its composition is related to its market area In terms of sizo, location, and type of store. Shopping centers provide on-site parking facilities. Studios of over 600 shopping centers were obtained for this analysis and included centers as small Is 6,900 to as large as 2.2 million square feet gross leasable area. The centers studied are lcwated In suburban areas throughout the United States, and therefore reflect average i condll ons anywhere within the United States. Some of the centers Included non-merchandising uses such as otiice buildings, movie theaters, post c fives, banks, health clubs, and recreational facilities such as ice skating rinks or indoor iminia ire golf courses. • Many shopping centers, In addition to the integrated unit of shops in one building or • encloi ed around a mall, include outparcels(peripheral buildings or pads located'on the perimeter of the center adjacent to the streets and major access points). These buildings are generally drive-In banks, restaurants,or small offices. The data herein do not Indicate which centers Included peripheral buildings. in general, It can be assumed that the data do reflect the effect of the peripheral buildings. However, it Is suggested when estlm;:iting driveway volumes for a shopping center for the purpose of designing the acces:i that a conservative approach be taken. First,calculate the trips generated by the i peripi eral buildings as part of the shopping center(using the shopping center trip •=...genera itlon statistics)and as a multi-use development(using the peripheral land uses trip genen:dlon statistics). Then use the higher of the two estimates. The vehicle trips generated at a shopping center are based upon the gross leasable area (GLA) of the canter. In cases of smaller Centers without an enclosed mall or peripheral buildings, the gross I:asabie area could be the same as the gross floor area of the building. The shv� in center data generally indicate that the rate of akin Pp 9 9 lY triprn g decreases as the size of the oeriter increases. The most accurate method to estimate the driveway volumes at a 1 shopping center for the non-Christmas season Is to utilize regression equations for the desired i day an i time period, and then apply the directional distribution percentages to determine the entering and exiting volumes. The use of rates appears to be more accurate for centers j exceec Ing 400,000 square feet GLA for the Christmas season. i iSepara to equations have been developed for shopping centers less than and greater than 570,00x1 or 800,000 square feet gross leasable area(depending on the time period of the trip) for t e the entl re year excluding the Christmas shopping season. This methodology eliminates the need to catel.lorize the center as a neighborhood, community,or regional shopping center, or by E . differs,-t ITE land use codes other than 820. The toll wing figures graphically illustrate the regression equations and actual measured trips as related to gross leasable area. Table 1 provides an approximation of the trip rates as derived from these equations for different shopping centers for average weekday and Saturday conditions. Trip Qeleration,January 1991 1230 Institute of Transportation Engineers I, 12/02/99 THU 12:_56 FAX 2 MULVANNY ARCHITECTS [il]003 • • i [• • • 1.. d Land Use: 861 Discount� Club Description A discount dub is a discount store/warehouse whose shoppers pay a membership fee In order to take advantage c'f discounted prices on a wide variety of items including food, clothing,tires, "•' appliances, etc.; r'rany items are sold in bulk. Additional Da.a information on tralsit trip ends is not available. • Information on pei son trip ends la not available. Information on trul;k trips is not available. Vehicle occupanc. (based on a limited sample): • 1.45 persc ns per automobile. Peak hours of the generator(based on a limited sample): Weekdays 11:00 A.M. to 2:00 P.M, Weekends 2:00 P.M. to 3:00 P.M. These studies wen:conducted In 1964 and 1990.at discount clubs In the San Diego and I Columbus metropc.litan areas. These sites average 165 employees(range of 90 to 239), 10 acres (range of 9 t{1 12), and 726 parking spaces(range of 660 to 791), Only one site provided • t' ' information on occi[pied gross leasable area-96,000 square feet. J �, Source Numbers 31: • 212, 333 Y• • 1 44 • f • • • . I Tnp Generation,January 1991 1435 Institute of Transportation Engineers 12/02/99 THU 12: 56 FAX 2 MULVANNY ARCHITECTS e1004 RECEIVED /di/A/wit Novembe- 23, 1999 NOV 2 6 1999 MULBELLEVUE.HWACTS CITY OF TIGARD Mulvanny Architects OREGON Ken Kroeller 11820 Northrup Way Ste E-300 Bellevue WA 98005 TRAFFIC MPACT FEE FOR Costco Warehouse Addition Enclosed with this letter you will find a calculation sheet showing the computation that has !men performed to determine the amount of the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) to be paid fc r the project noted above. The amount of the TIF is $35,389.00. You have three payment options available to you. The first is to pay the TIF at the time you are issued a building permit. The second is to arrange for payment over time by s gning a promissory note (if you wish to exercise this second option please contact ne for additional details). The third option is to defer payment until occupanc i. Traffic impact fees are subject to an annual increase of up to 6% if not paid or fir anced prior to July 1st of each year. Please no :e that you may appeal the discretionary decisions made in determining the approprial a category and the amount of the fee based on that category. A notice of appeal must be received by the City Recorder no later than 5:00 p.m. on December 7,1999 ;Ind must be accompanied by the $638.00 appeal fee required by Washington County. Although filed with the City Recorder, an appeal would be heard by ihe Washington County Hearings Officer. If you ha%e any questions, or if I can be of further service, please contact me at 639- N-1.` • / Deb ie R. Adamsk' Development Se vices Technician c: TIF file Bui ding file L\OSTSITIF3.00T 13125 SW Hall Blvd , Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 12/02/99 THU 12: 57 FAX 2 MULVANNY ARCHITECTS IZI 005 0 • .., . . ImmimmmOIONINII! DATE: . PLANS CHECK NO.: // %22 I //-01:)C PROJECT TITLE: . . (1)4741-80 Ze_.)/42/2E/4e/ C.-4- /4-1). /77e),k) COUNTYWIDE , . TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE APPLICANT: ,t1 0 kQO t 6 A- 64■5)4P0A- gg rv■3 WORKSHEET, MAILING ADDRESS: • (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY li.JSES) CITY/ZIP/PHONE: imil■I■1 RATE PER LAND USE CATEGORY TRIP SITUS NO.A9DRESS: • RESIDENT IAL 1111Mirrl II! .7K.5.0 r-sko -74,),)(2.-rk-ii)4J-TH. F BUSINESS AND COMMERCI. 4 $51.00, _ . OFFICE $184.00 • INDUSTRIAL '$193.00 • INSTITUTI6NAL $83.00 • . . PAYMENT METHOD: • CASH/CHECK • CREDIT :- . INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: BANCROFT 1'ROMISSORY NOTE) LAND USE CATEGORY( DESCRIPTION OF WEEKDAY AVG.TRIP WEEKEND AVG.TRIP DEFER TO 0 CUPANCY gavn C-- '•iUSEpL1 RATE Lo 1,4 '/. 2 RATE . I , BASIS: CI.,c,*2, \ .....1:„.„,,j-- ),,t_f,,,......;;, i:,..7, a,... 1 0, LI! , c. ,a e'zt....,,,r; 4,,,._6;.. ..:'.4.".,., .,.. lzr; ,, 9,y c),E. . ig,:, c.. d CALCULATIONS: )( #'5 co 5e / -,,--- / or ,-,1" (-, , ---.'. ' -14//:::: • PROJECTj7ENERATION: FEE:'j . - 6,. 9 FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY . ADDITIONAL NOTES: - , - - ... i:./ / ROAD AMT.: 4v_sqv .. 7 2, _ /4 WO , -7-/-/-__I/Li TRANSIT AMT.: / 4//() . - ' i 7 . / PREPARED By: i • -(A) C-,..4//71-41,t.-cat; 8/7019 t Nwot9Allt4o4kahoi4 99-00.doc • CC: WASHINGTON 0:UNITY TIF NOTEBOOK . . 12/02/99 THU 12:58 FAX 2 MULVANNY ARCHITECTS Ij006 • COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE 141Tholiii+ APPEAL INFORMATION CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Attached is a c spy of the Director's decision on this Traffic Impact Fee assessment or Traffic Impact Fee Credit/Offset re quest. This decision rr ay be appealed and a public hearing held by filling a signed petition for review (appeal) within fourteen ;14) calendar-days-of the date written notice is provided (date mailed). APPEAL PERIOD: Date mailed: //-073 -99 to 5:00 PM on 4-7-99 Appeal Due Date A motion for ref.onsideration also may be filled within seven calendar days of the date written notice of the decision is l irovided (see Section 208 of the Washington County Community Development Code). A motion for recoi isideration does not stop the appeal period(s) from running and is available only as an 'extraordinary re medy for when a mistake of law or fact has occurred. A motion for reconsideration requires a fillinc fee of$638.00. This decision w II be final if an appeal is not filed by the due dates(s), and a motion for reconsideration is not granted by I he Director. The complete fi e is available at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 for review. A petition for re flew (appeal) must contain the following: 1. 1 he name of the applicant and the relevant casefile/building permit/other development F ermit number; 2. 1 he name and signature of the petitioner filing the petition for review (appeal). If a c roup consisting of more than one person is filing a single petition for review, one is idividual shall be designated as the group's representative for all contacts with the C•epartment. All Department communications regarding the petition, including c Drrespondence, shall be with this representative; 3. F statement of the interest of the petitioner; 4. 1 he date the notice of decision was sent as specified in the notice; 5. 1 he petition for review (appeal) shall state the relevant facts, applicable ordinance p-ovisions, and relief sought; and 6. 1 he fee of$638.00 for Director's decisions being appealed to the Washington County I-earings Officer. For further appeal information contact::'DF6A/E 4b44M aki , 6,59- 1/171 X 7/p • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 I:\dst\tiappeal.doc 12/02/99 THU 12:59 FAX 2 MULVANNY ARCHITECTS 0 007 . 110• • • • COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE çREGO ,/)N /1- 1-917 1Y1,5-0 `DART/'- r// Date Site Address ea,e6 10- - - - - --#45 - _ ,!,_ _ Project Name Plan Check# I realize;that I must make a decision on payment of the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) at this time. 1 herefore, I request the following (choose whichever option or options are . applica)le): F7 Cash or Check • • Credit Voucher • Bancroft or Installment Payments • or • The Ordinance allows for deferral of payment of the TIF until issuance of the • occupancy permit if the TIF is greater than $5,000. If the TIF meets this requirement, I also request this option. I understand the TIF must be paid prior to issuance of an occupancy permit.. I also understand that the TIF will be • recalculated based on.the prevailing rates at the time of payment. Please be • advised that TIF rates may increase up to six percent each July 1st. This rate increase is not subject to appeal. • OWN1 RIAPPLICANT OWNER/APPLICANT cc: Buil.ling Permit File Payr lent Option Notebook • 13125 SW Hall Blvc I., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 i:\dsts\fo ms\tifsub.doc 9/8/99 • . . . _— --* '. 4. er • ' 0 DATE: PLANS CHECK NO.: //"-• 9V PROJECT TITLE: COUNTYWIDE , OD.b1- 0 ZO4a./4-(bt. Ab T L 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE APPLICANT: itn) keO t 6 /? 0,9,5002,— 08-01•Z WORKSHEET MAILING ADDRESS: (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY CSES) CITY/ZIP/PHONE: , . - TAX MAP NO.: RATE PER LAND USE CATEGORY TRIP SITUS NO.ADDRESS: RESIDENTIAL , 785 0 4L.t.) 7)62.-r1-10c:rrfri BUSINESS AND COMMERCI $51.00 OFFICE $184.00 INDUSTRIAL $193.00 \ , . INSTITUTIONAL $83.00 1)i-ej PAYMENT METHOD: \ CASH/CHECK CREDIT / • INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF WEEKDAY AVG.TRIP WEEKEND AVG.TRIP • DEFER TO OCCUPANCY 8ACQ. USE 1-14.)pi..vsyty, RATE tcce, ,11) RATE ; • l": /7 .._;,-'- BASIS: attO :,i,i IN__,-Ai- ÷\)t•-..f.4--sk...C....0 ....4.... 10) q 1 6, ..,.., 0...a... __LI cx:17:4 ) l C, A'"Kt/ 6st.4.4...41.k. "-e!---:;' f:111,a, .,,f 4 , -__;.b.::,i, L.- , . CALCULATIONS: g 66: x 3,e 7, 6 L____ --,c------ -?1//'::. PROJECUIpENERATION: i 3 • FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES:ty yi:. .--.-.-,/.,..4., ;Al,: 7 -,- -6/ 1 00 ROAD AMT.: -.17-1 7/ ---b-A:/ TRANSIT AMT.:§ ,76,,-, zrio i - / v' I PrRan...,,,_„„,/_ 6R/99 MscottlOtihworkshoot 99-OO.doc CC: WASHINGTON COUNTY TIF NOTEBOOK • • • /aii Jllilim 11 November 23, 1999 CITY OF TIGARD Mulvanny Architects OREGON Ken Kroeger 11820 Northrup Way Ste E-300 Bellevue WA .98005 . TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE FOR Costco Warehouse Addition Enclosed with this letter you will find a calculation sheet showing the computation that has been performed to determine the amount of the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) to be paid for the project noted above. The amount of the TIF is $35,389.00. You have three payment options available to you. The first is to pay the TIF at the time you are issued 'a building permit. The second is to arrange for payment over time by signing a promissory note (if you wish to exercise this second option please contact me for additional details). The third option is to defer payment until occupancy. Traffic impact fees are subject to an annual increase of up to 6% if not paid or financed prior to July 1st of each year. Please note that you may appeal the discretionary decisions made in determining the appropriate category and the amount of the fee based on that category. A notice of appeal must be received by the City Recorder no later than 5:00 p.m. on December 7,1999 and must be accompanied by the $638.00 appeal fee required by Washington County. Although filed with the City Recorder, an appeal would be heard by the Washington County Hearings Officer. If you have any questions, or if I can be of further service, please contact me at 639- 0 Deb ie R. Adamsk' Development Services Technician c: TIF file Building file mossyriF3.wr . 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 411b,, COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE CITY OF TIGIp PAYMENT OPTION FORM OREGON 9 ins° ,` Di94"rMoum/ Date Site Address e 7 Zt)igi nrim d,.) �r--z Project Name Plan Check# I realize that I must make a decision on payment of the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF)at this time. Therefore, I request the following(choose whichever option or options are applicable): Ei Cash or Check • • El Credit Voucher Bancroft or Installment Payments or • The Ordinance allows for deferral of payment of the TIF until issuance of the occupancy permit if the TIF is greater than $5,000. If the TIF meets this requirement, I also request this option. I understand the TIF must be paid prior to • issuance of an occupancy permit. I also understand that the TIF will be recalculated based on .the prevailing rates at the time of payment. Please be advised that TIF rates may increase up to six percent each July 1st. This rate increase is not subject to appeal. OWNER/APPLICANT OWNER/APPLICANT cc: Building Permit File Payment Option Notebook 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 is\dsts\forms\tifsub.doc 9/8/99 r, COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE A it APPEAL INFORMATION CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Attached is a copy of the Director's decision on this Traffic Impact Fee assessment or Traffic Impact Fee Credit/Offset request. This decision may be.appealed and a public hearing held by filling a signed petition for review (appeal) within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date written notice is provided (date mailed). APPEAL PERIOD: Date mailed: //-a3-99 to 5:00 PM on /.?-7-99 Appeal Due Date A motion for reconsideration also may be filled within seven calendar days of the date written notice of the decision is provided (see Section 208 of the Washington County Community Development Code). A motion for reconsideration does not stop the appeal period(s) from running and is available only as an extraordinary remedy for when a mistake of law or fact has occurred. A motion for reconsideration requires a filling fee of$638.00. This decision will be final if an appeal is not filed by the due dates(s), and a motion for reconsideration is not granted by the Director. The complete file is available at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 for review. A petition for review (appeal) must contain the following: 1. The name of the applicant and the relevant casefile/building permit/other development permit number; 2. The name and signature of the petitioner filing the petition for review (appeal). If a group consisting of more than one person is filing a single petition for review, one individual shall be designated as the group's representative for all contacts with the Department. All Department communications regarding the petition, including correspondence, shall be with this representative; 3. A statement of the interest of the petitioner; 4. The date the notice of decision was sent as specified in the notice; 5. The petition for review (appeal) shall state the relevant facts, applicable ordinance provisions, and relief sought; and 6. The fee of$638.00 for Director's decisions being appealed to the Washington County Hearings Officer. For further appeal information c o n t a c t ebbi E 41)4M 6A/ 6s r- 4//71 X .4 • 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 I:ldstltiappeal.doc