Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
ZON2005-00009
'42 CITY OF TIGARD G R6 Community Development Shaping Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 3/2/2006 FILE NO.: ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2005-00009 FILE TITLE: UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE APPLICANT: LDC Design Group OWNER: Richard Ackerman, James Wathey Attn: Ed Murphy and LaRusso Concrete Co., Inc. 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive do Ackerman Hillsboro, OR 97124 919 West Point Road Lake Oswego, OR 97034 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval for a Zone Change from Light Indtkstrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) for approximately six (6) acres located between SW 74 Avenue and Upper Boones Ferry Road. The subject property is currently developed with outdoor storage and older industrial buildings. The applicant envisions developing the property with an office use, which is not permitted in the Light Industrial zone. LOCATION: 15920 SW 74th Avenue and 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and adjoining roperties. WCTM 2S113AB, Tax Lots 200/300/400/500; and 2S112DC, Tax Lots 1100/1200/1300. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if PROPOSED any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the the zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.520. • DECISION MAKING BODY: ❑ TYPE I ❑ TYPE II ® TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: NOVEMBER 10,2005 -DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: NOVEMBER 28, 2005 ❑ HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: DECEMBER 19, 2005 TIME: 7:00 PM ❑ CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM ❑ STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION VICINITY MAP El TRAFFIC REPORT D UTILITY PLANS SITE PLAN C. EXISTING CONDITIONS . IMPACT STUDY NARRATIVE J I STORM DRAINAGE CALCS. E. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS STAFF CONTACT: Gary Pagenstecher,Associate Planner(503)639-4171,x 2434 M . • . PRE-APR HELD BY CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING- DIVISION ,2 pp 13125'SW'HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OR 97223-818RECEW V E 11111 503.639.4171/503:684.7297 CITY OF TIGARD SEP 9 8 2005 OREGON LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION CAP!OF'TIGARD �� �l�lr;ilr File#1 jo N 000-4.Zo7 Other Case# P o5 4ctoo Date 'l/vSI(. By K-111 Receipt# ,2-43c5 Y9/5- 'City rb• Date Complete TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑Adjustment/Variance (I or II) ❑ Minor Land Partition (II) ®Zone Change (III) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment (IV) ❑ Planned Development (III) ❑Zone Change Annexation (IV) ❑ Conditional Use(III) • ❑ Sensitive Lands Review(1, 11 or III) ❑Zone Ordinance Amendment (IV) ❑ Historic Overlay(II or 111) ❑Site Development Review (II) ❑ Home Occupation (11) ❑Subdivision (II or III) • • •11 - --•-• • . • ,1 • •- •..ressl avaia•e 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd. and adjoining properties 2S113AB00500; 2S113AB00400; 2S113AB00300; 2S112DC01100; 2S112DC01200; 2S112DC01300 IUJAL Silt SILL LUNINGC oli-t:ATIUN -6 acres I-L • ANPL[cAIq l' LDC Design Group MAILING AUL3kESSIUI I YIS I AI EJLlI- 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro, OR 97124 I-'HONt NU. FAX NO. 503.858.4242 • 503.645.5500 --� ' • l • • - • ' --el, le. Ed Murphy 503.858.4 ,4as• F'RUNERI Y UWNlWL5lEU HULUlK(Attach list if more than one) Richard Akerman, James Wathey and LaRusso Concrete Company, Inc. c/o Akerman 919 West Point Road, Lake Oswego, OR 97034 i-TIONI_NO. FAX NO. • 503.697.6203 503.784.8981 *When the owner and the applicant are deferent people, the applicant must be pap purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorizationfroliz the owner or an agent of the owner. Theners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form-or submit a written authorization with this application. --••• Ivvm ' -ease •es. c • Zone map amendment from light industrial to Industrial park APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET. • ak THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: ♦ If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. ♦ All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits• transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. ♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. Z$ (>1011°P-Sign '' Date /z570 O n- ig a ure Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date • Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date A . CITY OF TIGARD - 7/.3wZAJuD 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 4:36:40PM Tigard,Oregon 97223 AL (503) 63 9-417 1 Receipt #: 27200500000000004915 Date: 09/30/2005 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid ZON2005-00009 [LANDUS]Amend CDC(Map) 100-0000-438000 2,649.00 ZON2005-00009 [LRPF]LR Planning Surcharge 100-0000-438050 391.00 Line Item Total: $3,040.00 Payments: Method Payer User ID Acct./Check No.Approval No. How Received Amount Paid Check JAMES E WATHEY&RICHARD KJP-. >' 1127 In Person 3,040.00 D AKERMAN Payment Total: $3,040.00 1 • • CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes March 6,2006 1. CALL TO ORDER Vice-President Munro called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Tigard Civic Center,Town Hall, at 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Vice-President Munro; Commissioners Buchner, Cattail, Duling,Haack,Inman,Meads, and Walsh Commissioners Absent: Staff Present: Dick Bewersdorff,Planning Manager, Gary Pagenstecher, Associate Planner, Gus Duenas, City Engineer;Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer,Jerree Lewis,Planning Commission Secretary 3. ELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION PRESIDENT Commissioners Buehner and Inman were nominated for President. The vote resulted in a tie, so it was decided to vote again at the next meeting. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS The Planned Development Review Committee meets tomorrow night to wrap up their recommendations. The Committee for Citizen Involvement met February 16th to hear a presentation about the City's preparedness plan. They also had an update on the Comprehensive Plan. The City Center Advisory Commission (CCAC) has set priorities for next year's projects. They had a long discussion about improvements on Burnham Street. They're waiting for the final report from the Streetscape Committee. The Park and Recreation Advisory Board held a discussion about the former Black Bull property on North Dakota. The secondary access under the railroad tracks was not a legal PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—March 6,2006—Page 1 • easement at this point (Commissioner Buehner advised that this issue has been resolved). The cost of the pedestrian bicycle bridge across the Tualatin River has increased substantially. Tigard may enter into an IGA with Tualatin to come up with the extra funds. The City has volunteered to donate almost enough money to make the skate park go forward. The City will re-apply for a grant they didn't receive last year, plus, they'll apply for other smaller grants. With goals for this year, there has been discussion about setting up some sort of a recreational district. The Transportation Financing Task Force will be meeting in a couple of weeks to discuss a variety of transportation issues. 5. APPROVE MINUTES It was moved and seconded to approve the February 6,2006 meeting minutes as submitted. The motion passed unanimously. 6. PUBLIC HEARING 6.1 ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2005-00009 UPPERBOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE Continued from December 19, 2005 and February 6, 2006 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval for a Zone Change from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) for approximately six (6) acres located between SW 74th Avenue and Upper Boones Ferry Road. The subject property is currently developed with outdoor storage and older industrial buildings. The applicant envisions developing the property with an office use, which is not permitted in the Light Industrial zone. LOCATION: 15920 SW 74th Avenue and 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and adjoining properties. WCTM 2S113AB, Tax Lots 200/300/400/500; and 2S112DC, Tax Lots 1100/1200/1300. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well- integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: CommunityDevelopment Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.520. Commissioners Buehner,Meads, and Walsh reported site visits. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—March 6,2006—Page 2 • STAFF REPORT Associate Planner Gary Pagenstecher presented the staff report on behalf of the City. He advised that very few comments were received for this application. At the neighborhood meeting,the applicants did not receive any comments in opposition to the zone change. The staff report addresses each criterion. The Commission's decision needs to be based on compliance with applicable Comprehensive Plan policies, compliance with applicable '1'DC standards, and evidence of change in the neighborhood or a mistake in the Comp Plan or zoning map. Staff recommends approval with conditions. Commissioner Buehner noted in the staff report that there was discussion about potentially adding another through lane on Upper Boones Ferry and a right turn lane on Durham. She wonders if we know when that will occur. Staff answered that we're looking for this applicant's proportionate share as it develops and will look for the same from other developments as they come in. Commissioner Buehner wonders if we could see a large increase in traffic in this area if other properties ask for a zone change. Staff said that as this property goes through site development review, they will have a traffic study done. The City could request that they look out into the future, perhaps for 10 years,for a projection. This will be similar to the Tigard Triangle where the City has been collecting funds for signalization of 68th/72nd and Dartmouth. Commissioner Buehner asked if the City has plans to look at doing major improvements on 74th Ave. and the intersection with Durham Road. Kim McMillan answered that she was not aware of any plans, but noted that light rail will be coming through that intersection. For this project, they do not have direct frontage where they would have to improve 74th Ave. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION. Richard Akerman, 919 Westpoint Rd., Lake Oswego 97034, advised that he is the owner of the property and has been there since the mid-1970's. He has operated Oregon Landscape and Northwest Landscape Industries on the property for years. They bought adjacent property. He reported that, as PacTrust came through and rezoned everything, these parcels stayed the way they were with the exception of one office building that is in the IP zone. He believes it's time to change; he would like to see better use of the land, like the surrounding PacTrust properties. Brian Bennett, 29080 SW Petes Mountain Rd., West Linn, OR 97068 testified that OPUS Northwest is proposing the future development for this property if the zone change goes through. Ed Murphy, 9875 SW Murdock, Tigard 97224 advised that the properties were zoned light industrial in 1980 and that circumstances have changed since that time. He said one of the criteria is whether this proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. He spoke about PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—March 6,2006—Page 3 • • another criterion— evidence of a mistake or inconsistency of the Comprehensive Plan or zoning map. He believes the zoning map is now inconsistent. Using a current zoning map, he showed that approximately 94% of the surrounding properties are zoned IP. Elmo Studd's (a lumber yard) is in an IP zone,which is a non-conforming use. Eventually that property will be redeveloped with an IP use. Murphy advised that another criterion is that the proposed use will meet the standards of the zone. The proposed office buildings meet that criterion. Trish Nixon, 1121 SW Salmon, Portland 97205, detailed the proposed new development. It includes two new 3 story office buildings totaling approximately 125,000 square feet (Exhibits A and B). There will be dedication of right-of-way on Upper Boones Ferry for the proposed widening of the street. They plan to keep the existing driveway adjacent to the existing office building on Upper Boones Ferry Road. She detailed other features of the proposed development and advised that they plan to start construction this year. Julia Kuhn, Kittleson and Associates, 610 SW Alder, Suite 700, Portland, reported that her company did the traffic impact study for the project. She said ODOT requires them to look at 15 years beyond when the proposed zone change would be approved. The study found that the Upper Boones/Durham intersection fails today even without the development. They will contribute a proportionate share to improvements at that intersection. They are proposing to pay for a share of the southbound throughway and the southbound right turn lane. Kittleson also looked at the 72nd intersections along Upper Boones, Sequoia Parkway, and Carmen interchange. In the long term, the Carmen interchange will need an eastbound right turn lane onto I-5. They looked at site access points under near-term conditions and determined that there is adequate capacity. Their study, for 127,000 square feet of office space, projects about 260 trips during peak hours. They are in agreement with the conditions of approval. They requested that the proportionate share contributions be due at time of building permits rather than at time of zone change. Kim McMillan advised that the conditions of approval would have to be met before final building inspection. Commissioner Buehner expressed concerns about traffic in the overall area and whether we're creating a precedent in terms of other development occurring that will overwhelm a bad transportation system. Kim McMillan said this is the first project that has requested to participate in a shared contribution manner. Buehner commented that this intersection cannot wait 10-15 years for improvements to be made. McMillan suggested using the Capital Improvement Program to move this project forward. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—March 6,2006—Page 4 Concerns were raised about diminishing undeveloped I-L zoned land in the City. With regard to these particular parcels, everything else around it has been zoned I-P. Concerns were also raised about run-off from the parking lot. The Commission was reminded that the specific site plan was not what was being discussed tonight. The applicants described the water quality system which will be under the parking lot. The water will be treated per CWS standards before it goes into the creek. Since they most likely won't get a second driveway for their sole use,staff advised that the applicants would share one driveway with Elmo Studd's. There maybe conditions attached with that driveway during the site development review phase of the project. PUBLIC TESTIMONY None PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Commissioner Meads asked how strict the Commission could be about conditions regarding traffic. McMillan said they didn't think it was necessary because during the site development review,particulars will be addressed. This will be a Type 2 application. Commissioner Inman moved for approval of Zone Change (ZON) 2005-00009 with amended conditions of approval as so read: • Condition of Approval# 1 - Applicant shall contribute to the City their"proportionate share" at time of final building inspection of the eastbound right turn lane at the I-5 southbound ramp terminal/Upper Boones Ferry Road intersection. The rest of the condition to remain the same. • Amend Condition#2 - Applicant shall contribute to the City their"proportionate share" at time of final building inspection of the improvement costs for providing a second southbound lane, etc.,keeping the remainder of Condition#2;with the findings as shown in the staff report and public testimony. Commissioner Offall seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 6-0. Commissioners Buehner and Meads abstained. 7. 2006/07 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - PLANNING COMMISSION INPUT Gus Duenas, City Engineer, reviewed the proposed 2006-07 Capital Improvement Program (Exhibit Q. He advised that the public hearing for the Planning Commission would be May 15th. The Planning Commission had the following comments/questions [staff responses are in PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—March 6,2006—Page 5 • italics]: • Try to synchronize the signals on SW Durham. • Is it possible to use TIF funds for a 2-lane road? Typically, TIF finds are used to add caPacitY • Burnham Road needs to be 3 lanes at least from Hall Blvd. up to Ash Ave. • If we put a driveway from Ash Ave. to the Commuter Rail station,is that going to diffuse the impetus to build the street out in the future? What zee Taint to do is build a 2- lane access mid into the ConT utter Rail parking loo but mike sure it's zeithin the corridor for the future A sh A ze so it won't be zeasted • For the extension of Ash Ave.,what's the issue with right-of-way to Scoffins? We to study the co ridor fmom Fanno Creole north to Scoffins. We need to see what the lest alignnvnt will l� • Has anything been discussed about the "misalignment" of the Commercial Street/Main Street intersection? For the longterm y3, but for noz4 zee'ie just zeidening Cornnvrzzal to enhance it as a gatezeuy into the Dozerrtozen. • We need to deal with the Main Street/Tigard Street intersection. TriMet is proposing "gate"stem to signalize Tigard Stmt Maybe we could put up stop signs in the meantime. • Will the City be lengthening the right turn lane at Hwy. 99W and Bull Mountain Road? Yes • Will the City put one or two speed bumps on Ventura Drive? At this poin4 the City doesn't know how?rimy bumps zeill be installed on Ventura Drize • How many of the Public Works staff will be able to move over to the Water Building? Most of the offue staff vill he able to nvze to the Water Building hozeezer we're not sure about the aem They mg haze to stay in the Public Works conpound • For the Fanno Creek Trail crossing on Hall Blvd., will there be a flashing light? Yes, but it zeon't he an eniedded crosswalk. It will he a flashing ozerhead light • What is the concern about the Washington Square Regional Center Trail project? We're not sure zehat the cnnceryt is. There should be minimal impacts. • Commissioner Buehner reported that there is not much water pressure in her area (on the north side of the mountain). One el.the pnpasa l prcy.erts is to seanv a reserzoir site for the north side • We need a turn lane at the intersection of Tigard and Tiedeman. Duenas will bring it up again 8. DISCUSSION ITEM - 99W/HALL BLVD. INTERSECTION Commissioner Buehner led the discussion about this agenda item. She reported that this is in conjunction with what was discussed at the joint meeting with Council regarding the amenities in the Downtown area (a traffic safety median on 99W so people can get safely across the street). One of the issues from the engineers involved in this planning effort is getting a written comment from the Planning Commission in support of the project. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—March 6,2006—Page 6 • Commissioner Inman thinks this might encourage people to "hop,skip across" and the lights at that intersection are very long. Commissioner Caffall asked if there would be a way to protect the people standing on the island. Commissioner Buehner said the engineers would follow ODOT standards. Commissioner Munro asked if there wasn't a formal process to follow. Gus Duenas advised that OTAK has been asked to come up with some concepts as to how to treat the intersection. He would like to see what they recommend. He thinks a median would help pedestrians to cross. Duenas noted that the City Center Advisory Commission (CCAC) won't be effective until the Urban Renewal is formed. Council will also be hearing OTAK's recommendations for the intersection. The design will.be ADA compatible. It was moved and seconded that the discussion tonight be added to the minutes and sent to Gus Duenas requesting that the Planning Commission be involved in the input into the consideration of a traffic/pedestrian island. The motion passed unanimously. 9. OTHER BUSINESS The secretary informed the Commission about recent hirings in the Planning Department. 10. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:20 p.m. Jerree wis,Planning Commission Secretary A "' ST: Vice-President Munro PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—March 6,2006—Page 7 • • . 5y, • • • .. . • .........4.: : .•• .. • .• ,.. • ::: j4 I 5 • ..5.4 5 51 fil • .• • • • • • II. ? t mac..' 4 ?•• w s • • • H.. PLANT MATERIALS SCHEDULE ti" :ky WA%/INE •QINGLPek! Pt! MIRO %- r J•'r,.\'i, it mma rr-�.; AS. _ o Y mao,.nun.•rA...r.. mvaw.eo-e.nw # °"y_ —pekes a..,e.am •.o•ow•wNaivwm rcr. ..ww.0 �� fit\\ r 74 •.mwmlornocv a••awnn.•ns..o .wc.. ..wow c•�� �'. -•.',-'•`% � --.+..u.c r,....nu ..u+•..a+r r.� A'' J, �\N a\n `f` '/'/ #--nvaonoww. •.m.v.*•mom iyc_ uwow --Den VA.:u.w1 m.m.uw.av wr u row ONO mw r i"^ ,r t .\ \ _\: •i /i i* v ck �4 CCCOnroo.ec PJ \ a'fti\V „, •, , \\•.\\ -'. y «oss. k e —roan C . ULLA wau,w,a,. r WI OA •w--11.,01•:10,,. :' \ \ r-• .,.a.oa.,� ,. m..aNn,.w,.®„ c 1. � ` \" Ar° \:��, ,.. r . #�• �( \ % �!* ...10.•.••11 .a \�\ '' \� \,. i� /,:/ .�* �r•N•. w •._—_COM ..•w:wawwrc .aW raoc ` \,• \ �C• `\\,1�.;''> \\�\ �:-,,. .., t 4�:.\..-M _ •• ono urnim u..e. .wuwmanmowm. .0.1 ra oe •\• ' �' ; ^\li' `\\ \ •l'•. 4 :�:•I,�'� ,low exaowic •-----o ver va.ew van11r ava .111 :.oc f.';` ' k \ ��('�" ' • \\ \ r; ; S} •'�nuw•um wR.Wn coma oa�simr Ian • ,.\t' ✓'` ; .'\ '\\ (�V�\,``�\ • ,\.\ •f i A'• '/ •l•9 .5./ //• gWAC9VEP 'irt_Vn tia_WV+E_ ..\\‘'..X' ; �:.\ \ ' .-_.GA.00TTI...yr 10aut ,(7‘...i, .'��i', ':,1I✓�� '.6,•.. \ \\\.` -• \\,' �,�' \•l i �9. • `;A,:ft).•oaN•rm.•ownna m�o.w.vwmwrar i+ ' (?.. .�`'-( \\ \.. \\\.\,„,..'• PROPOSED � .', a � . � BUILDING A C..nNn n.arNa no., WPM..CAL RIMY • ' �\• - mF.` •` �9�� \'\\.; ;� _• 1• fi�r', 1 i/41eq+1 • ' ral,\II '• -..,.- (6. \. .71-,.:--;:;::■.' 1 !t►.; \ P. ,; '∎ ,'i �.�.`\‘\,:\..,.:,. `'irk` '<i i `'' ; • • pl. tfi '1 a iS"- •,ms�VD> `'i r�9 \@\:.. 7j� •iZ/ • o • I ,� - ! ` v `�-' - I —_1._ EXISTING __; ' ? V:,' 'I 1 1 11 i ■ I �1 I t, euaowo ''�e1 I I (anon i �:•7$: I _ • 1 __.r. �S, I I tom.. rfc. _/ �. r. I ;, -I f !n t ' f Man*6,.06 . -f; �� '' r -:-d _ -.1::: .4•& :,• - r ,a ,, ,: - - 0 g • Fanno Creek Commons I SW UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD \...o_re?re W I R ] G D • • t O N 1 NC. An "OPUS" Development • • Conceptual Site Plan • FY 2006-07 Capital Improvement Program March 6,2006 Presentation Overview • Formulation Process • Program Areas x • Priorities for FY 2006-07 • Proposed Projects k�f • What's Next? 1 • • :fir k. Formulation Process • Citywide meeting (December 7, 2005) • 2nd Citywide meeting (January 25, 2006) • Planning Commission (March 6, 2006) • City Council (March 21 , 2006) • Finalize Project List (March — May 2006) • Presentations in May and June 2006 Program Areas • Street System Program - Traffic Studies Syr - Traffic Safety-Related Projects — Pavement Major Maintenance - Traffic Calming Program - Improvements Capital Major Street Im 1 p� p Fx - Bridge Replacements 2 • • Program Areas ry • Sanitary Sewer System Program - Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance - Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvements - Sewer Extension Program • Storm Drainage System Program - Storm Sewer Major Maintenance - Storm Drainage Capital Improvements Program Areas w „t • Parks System Program - Citywide Parks - Trail Systems - Open space and greenspaces r lt,' ice. • Water System Program • City Facilities System Program 3 • Priorities for FY 2006-07 • Continue implementation of projects to improve the Tigard downtown • Complete the Highway 99W Corridor Improvement and Management Plan • • Identify and initiate projects to improve traffic circulation across and on Highway 99W • Continue to implement the Street Maintenance Fee funded projects p •_3 x Priorities for FY 2006-07 • Construct the Wall Street approach to Hall Boulevard to provide joint access for the and Fanno Pointe �t f� 7; • Construct improvements to Hall Blvd s r E _ • Expand the library parking lot • Install additional traffic calming measures • Continue with the Citywide Sewer Extension Program projects • 4 Priorities for FY 2006-07 • • Perform storm and sanitary system repairs • Implement planned Parks projects e • Acquire park property as open space or for 4 -- park development • Improve at least one existing park • Design and construct trail projects • Design and construct a skate park Priorities for FY 2006-07 +', • Implement water system improvements aimed at improved delivery and adequate x ; water supply = • Review City facility requirements • Consolidate Public Works to the extent feasible #,� 3 • Pursue implementation of alternative : . funding sources for major street improvements 5 • Street Projects �•,j Highway 99W Corridor Improvements C • Study of the Highway 99W corridor to - Evaluate various alternatives for improvement - Look for potential parallel routes or connections - Review both land use and physical improvements to improve circulation and reduce congestion - Funded through a TGM grant - Result will be a package of projects and land use strategies that can be implemented to improve conditions on Highway 99W 1;2 6 m65 fe, M66 Aem S k.• C.3 ,1 . 0 * 49:1.E?A;I n,44)',T..) • ',I• • A CA mipaeA8ino9 HuH • i . 1 . 1 . 1 . . 7 1 1 i 1 ipc)ul --. rc • .• I . ii ...111111111111111111111■11111111111-- .. . • , .. -.0.. - ,--.,...i.- ........ _• ..4r • - .. • s.-pi .. .:•.- ..... . - ; ...-- — - - \.••,..iid.c:Hlin,...:1 :-.....:J . . H:::311 at '4 4 .......'..1,,„.. •i Li's. :;'...' -*4 ..- - • • - -....,..,-- - ....'7'. 11.-",!"..4...4 44:.7.!1:.•171.7.".s::".:4"i::::::;:: . • . ". '.• • :::...................: • ...:,.r....... .7•THIPINol::!:;,....:;;'•• ... • • •• .I:.„.:::,;:...:.„,.........:::,'..:....:...:::::::::::: :....,....'.... .!''''..!A • . i.„,....• .. .. HALL,=No.. ..:.............,,„...:47......:.• ..A...4.1 :::9:".7...:7:..,... ... .. `....".....•.... .."...••••'••. .....•.".........:......:•••;:•::::::: :••N .::::.....'...4 .0.4 .::.::::::.:...:',:::.::::::!:. . . . • ...........,.....-.•,...,..::.••.:....:.,....,...:y.:::.,:::,....:.:,....1::.z.h, ...!..4::..,.:;.:::....-.'........:-::: ...,..,...,.......„.. ..... . ..,..•..7:•:•:::::.......•..::.:..•:.•:•:'.....'...:1,...-•:.:r....f......:::ligi.........7 • .....:.'..i.,..1:LHI::.•:.........'...:..: ..-.•::::•••:.:•,............',:.,.'.,..••............-...,......,::...:.... • . •• ::.:,:'..!,:::::::::::•,..„1::::.::'.........KALI. 4mcnotou.ir .... . ••••••••••••••••••• • i • .. '..!....'!.....:11:::::::::::::.•.:.:4.•••••••!........::: :::.....::::°.••..•....:!!!!!!!Tr..•.!...ii...!'...i.....1;::::1.1:.:: ...• ;k:C5:i'''''''''''''': • . . • . . _ ......... • ..1 Hp!1 . ,P , i n rel I rya n rry irr • ::.• '4.-i•ao"...........,-4::kolieic..qAtu:§..4:4,::,:;::,' . :, • .4 • •• 5-.....,:,....::-..--....--44.-....isw.4*0.44,..4. • -.. , . ..,...,••!:-.A ,1,,,... • : ....,pbs 1 i.)-....,n:;1,15.-n.6.-,-.-ct:I.A.gto:er 4.*.'.. ••.\-t s.T. •!'4....'-s. .k.:''':,:::.: • , • ?..A:,.."1 sAk a:.Y-•;frtitttial.ii......>\• ..... ......':,.•..,s.......•::: V.....1...)....i f:.....11 I H.:....; f........:1 ..,„01.7;,:.,;.:::,,At . ,ia.:.'''::::;..:.:....liik.',.ti. -NA• :..1.!':...7',•::.A.,...,,, i......:„:: -,-, 44., .„•••4 ,,,s0,To.-.., :-. • .-....,-."...:41.,-.r,„:: ,,,,.4.: • .. .:::::..., .,-..N.:.,..,..., , }•:-.4.,:: Li:• 44.43...4, .::gti.:, .:":'; l'i'f.:::.A.':-.;:.*:,:k•!•11::‘.,*,....,:7711...k.:. E.:::::::je., 1-1(..),t h of I • .;...,.- ,..,ii..-....._--;:---,*,..1"4-5,..g tit:N1'4:-. i.,!4!', ;V Z.':.'../44,',.!,164...filriglft:15'..:.0, q .(.!.0-. ---'......'....;,''. ....•••••...'i'.•1'1 C...• ; ....,..-2::...i'....:.:."..:_.:. .1.7....,.41,17: ,:k5...-....",..:,..:.'fi. `:•: 'I:.: '''4'1.43'1.',.... .i..,;-:^,'.A:...=:: -i.:7",l';41j6400 .1.•lj.'"•••4.'I.:.:•.4:- ..Y.F...i:0:rr:;m......ci.--...ktr:ij ,,,,:,,.;-. ..4 4;4.?:_ .44-•,...-4......,,.,., ,-, . i....,...:;,...i., ...,,r.414:7- :4-:•::........: ..• -,-.:f .......:,-2.1..!:1% ..p.-Ii:,,:--:.1:44:::(-- -..-^-tr* : .." ...-: .I ......';14,,_•..4',__..... 4 lit:.1,-,,. ..:*,......A.. Ittv5d..?:' - -- • • -• 4.-:,..415,02•'.4.:1-.' :.. ..;.• , ;!:.176.1.;4 • 4' V...-......m....:I '...*:: • 0 . . „ I Hail Botilevard improvements .4.1 -.... ii ...::!... --1.i:: . '.•. 1 ,..... -..- ......4..t.::-,...„:„....:...-. .,........-1....ni..,--,:::- I .........444,,,....:, . . .,.. . 1:i:.•••••;;;......4:;::':......:..•:. !-",:•-•± ......_ -.....:_„:1 :-...-• .----.....-. , .......„... :. .. . . •• - , ..., -•• - --- .•-" -.- • •.-•• , .......„.. . .y ....,,,„...„....• :., . - .......z.,-* N.. • • • 1 . ... m--. ...,.......-,7......;;;•_:........„...,.......• •-•-•.......i.. .3:::::• •'..-.pwr4t7i-.4 .1:'•; -•-:-:,-..1,•••••• HDri...—.... ...::l I71:i:•-• .'.... ...'.....,',:i5'....4....:;..........-......':'; :.A ..i'.:.•:+i 1.:. r;:!.."...-ii.:-[......:,:t•,•~.',..., ,....•.:--- [ "... ..:.,,...'::::(.....1...,e...:11.5.P.......Y.-?:::*<':-....;-:"..... .3,.:,.':-...".:1A;:t..41.7..:4•!.' ' ••••••••'"'••••' \ I. • .••:::- ....,.......*:::- :,..48.0.i!.:=:-.... --",.'- 818."..8 .;;; 8888 L• • : ....'4.:P.::..:''.... -4A.;44.4i...:,..'...t.:*-. 1*,,..7 ';', i '1,n, ' .. - . . 1 ..: '.. ::::,;;;AFAirr. ::::=*:::;......::::;*.:**1t*:, .71:4„ • :., * :.' 1 • ' ..: ..........:•''..*:*;:—.1'./..*:.'i,......,§— 6,1*.i...I.:f*=.'...;:',..'i t'...,:i•igi:. ..-;:s' 1 ..' : 1........*:::: :?'...!. ...1*.i;',.....1111iiiii..0: i',5.?..i;C*****Z.1::::•I'l•:;.::::--._ * '''':-.:.': _ : Da888110118h8112811 AV(1111.1e i intersectiori .... . :. .* . . .. : :,.......•; ...„,.... _ .... .... ... ....s..... .„., ,........ ,• ....•.......•.- _......,. •• .; • • - - • .......• . :-.....;:[•(:)j.:•••::::.f..--;....... .........,:tk-::-..r:s tne •;-:-.44......d.......,..............aci.....::::::._s :........n.-.1(..-, :1"1::,•••••••1-7::•-:ii:-.••••-•., a 1.• ••37 .:, S....r.......1r.':::::ii ...'.......88818.8.8 18 Dartmouth/72"d Avenue intersection ii :012011lititii.009g •-• :190212111108.104,92::18199-11$ ..9910Z90911920:1:91;1912212402,422 i-919919t19.201li:91214M 19 it. 2 h • " 08th Avenue/Durham Road • • Development occhirfirrig along 1081 • I...re-ft-turns onto Durhiarn are difficult during perak tranuel itours ' rattle anaiy-sis snows sigrhal is Justified at trhat tocatiort Project vrtgl desigin anc construct a traffic - signal at the intersection . 20 • Dartmouth/72nd Avenue Intersection '. 108th Avenue/Durham Road C • Development occurring along 108th • Left-turns onto Durham are difficult during peak travel hours • Traffic analysis shows signal is justified at that location • Project will design and construct a traffic signal at the intersection 20 10 0 W H... -,,Al ? , '.-.. 1 1 R o -1 mIIIMIIIIIIIIIIMIIII-- fh:. ........„-.,..7141.?,i.:.. ... ._„..",,,,h'ri4.43•••'.." :....ffsiii4.1:.:2;•:•.,• ' • •••:.%''• ' •*tot .. .... . ...,'••• 41t,......1`.151 .•:,. ..•.,'''...":„ imi.,,,,I, ,,,_ v...r 4. .-...eL-04 . .. - w:, .;f...... -4.• ,..,:. tt . ._,. .!tr7trite- -lii-aTial, -, •41..r.c,p,-1:4,4,0711. ±- ...f.Z.,.#most.:41.,adt.?.:, 40... ..- ._ ti. •'''' •... ...--..t.•• •• .... ..x • . • .' .-.4i:l.k„V'ii.t 4l'.7••e••.'C.•:.4;,'I'.4;;.',,1..H.:,.•...:i,.".?r.‘..•;2;1.•I.'''4.* ia'ii'5';':AFM:!,l,Ui...i.i 11""Si-1'iJ'.)l.t1-i fLX32I':)i•kNt.eT.'1.es..;;.t,4.,*ei11l,6...,h1••1y1'L i:.e t.1T"ti:0iI4.t iI•.6NI4;;Z.1'0''6!.';O'/11-4 1I 4.111 ii ' .4 4 F : );•t4W'!"3'.;i••,:I%,4”,l-:4g:••i,••:1iA•1k!■;li•-?:%1.i...!''.•-..%'..•..4•e;"'.,.•.%4..•.•.-4...l.',i'N..zs--.,‘.::-•'-•;•;iC,':'•""''i'.0-..:-:,-:.,1! r;,::Z:::i1,.';.•nt.is•"-;4-•I...i-S I zt Viitmzrk C aiN1j . . .I.i!-•' _ ' d ;(1; . 04 14 - .; ••- .•,` -:`'.,'....:1:fh ::",•f::-...;;4ir-e.:,,..:s:. . '.46 1m..1.•,•=1.1-:.%.444:1:Kra.f.:1'7••••1.4.,;..--::-.-'-!--;;;:....11,12iv4...:):,•.;:"s,..,..... , -• .7..,h!;„.• .. ..s1F7-::•!:.t.og-441.11,4ibg.0.,.;15,,,....,..,,.-..,,,:,-;,...,.„,_*„.,..,,,...,:i.„,,,,,...,„:...,:„......:. .....,„:„.., ..,k.„- . ......:..,,..:„.,.,..........,„.:,, 4.44.... o'••i;.. •••:7:•" 'WM • • "..'' .. :.'7,Pr...744'7.141t1=747h."44:n ':" ""q‘d‘•"!;..'... -4.•r!.• "..::;:'''.;".. .• .•''''''4: ••••• • .:;" • 1.74.; ,.1.4,:•:ttAX'.:Zilg..,:•• ••'•• -1.:,.Sir;;t4:!:..,:::tf i•:1ti;,,.... ,•,1...■• ....,.;),•,....;,. . • .• f. .•...1.1■1,,f,,''lliF4-44:ririgli: 41,1:11.•1.....:IT.115idt;',4W.:47.'::P•'f.14!1Y4'sli>.1.:.'•1 .• A'':••• ..`7 •'..7.' • ,.4'"i:t i.5.i"by '11..-1"44.'7._17,4-it...4$1111..;"1.:ifort.iimp+ .7154::.:::. :`,..:... 7.•:.•....--!;:,i:::•••••5 .:. : : .3.el....-rr:...,11,, :7,::t.t.r.4,11._ • ••.":A'...!i„..::•;:•.-.:.:,s 4 .k.:.:::..-......-.;',,,.,.:.. . .... JA t ;.:44.t.,y.o..‘,.-1.4,••. -mfl. '•••••••- ---,-,...NIL;..n;••Il. I" - • •",...,-,1:..,•1•..,...,_ - • . .-'.itletXti.;'i..-•Y4'21;41:VI,:' , • .. .. . -• , • 1 21 • ..... . . .. 4.,.. 22- - n ) , . . I ,.. . Ali et a , / R 1 .••• . . . . . , I,• , . -• in...:79,• •.. f,.?.•....„,.,: .• r 2, 14 • f... .:; •''' t • :• . . . ... .. :.•,, . '1'.';.f.....- it•••••- • ' •'. :.:1:- ....:-. ' a‘;i'0,•:-'1•..1.'1 1":f _ f. ••• ,- .4. .. :sf VP. • . • • • ' ''' . " ..•! .... . ......, ..,,,i .."- , . . ...... : . ''''''.1c.......:.:77,1.CF:''..• .••• ...••• . T11...5: il,....iiii!......................•:..•..:... . ••••••. ............;•....!.....:-.::::::::::::.i, .,.1 46. -•1 LI'-'14::.....:::,, ......',.....................•.,•••••:1••••••••••••::::::::r.:::::!..........1....i.:,....lii....4••••••4:::•.. .....„......._..,---,... g,...p. ..............................:,..:4::::::•••-..................44:Jii.:f•:iyg.Q. 4.•!!...........,............................:.::::::•••••..................•...ii:••::::::1:::::::::::.....**.f...!....y. ...,......;rth...............,„An . -:•• .: .••• :r.s.:A.k:,..,•-a::::•q:::::::;:•:::::•:..:.„ . :• :•.:-.•:,:,:;::::::::1:::::ri.'":::".7:•••;..t....::,..... •: • •••••.•...:::....„•i::1):1::::1_7..... .dit`0;.•:i:Il'i.*:::.r.......7.1:::::••••P..,,,,,,, ..::"...!:1::,...i:!h:1•4'..•:•Atir,74 : '41!!..'•'''''.......':1:1:":".441.iN,IM ...5..'.:!::::..4:9:'::::::::',...:1...Pril :••••.•'-;• .....•....-:•-..wg,:!:.;3,-,;ofti•ka. •:.• ::4.. :..:.,:ik:',iri*:::::!•..r..:::•;:::::2,:,...1::::iHrf„.•;!!':•fi•Tlia ...••••:;.:-.....,...4::,:::.:.,...; Er;,A.,'...;i::.•:'•::-.,:. :if:.1•%Iiif.i•••k,iiPi7r,.••. . .. -••••••• •"::• •••:.:;.!..,..f.m.ii::::1:::•1:•:•:::::::::::!•::::::.......•::::::::••1:::rff..::r.;.•.:11.2 '. • :••: ...........: ...:••••'7:7:.:,;::4:1iikt;.1:•,•::::,:'•;;;-.•::•••••••"••••'"•:'3i ••• •......,::::::'.:•::::::::::::::•:••....:•hr.:•,..,:f.. ••tc::•-•qz: i:: ....•.............::::,...-4 •. ••:.:!**:!:::ii!':::::::•ii::::::!1::::.:',::i::**:::::"::::T:::::„1:.......np...,.,:. .,i ... .. ............ :•..:::• :.......• . .• :::::::::.,........::::.::.••:::::::•::::::,:::....9::::••••::*:::::::!e::::: :I .•:.•'..••..•...::::: ......._ S • t 1 k ,�x 2� v at" Y.. Tigard Downtown Projects • Burnham Street Improvements • Commuter Rail Station Enhancement • Main Street Safety Improvements • Ash Avenue (Design, rights-of-way acquisition, and construction) • Commercial Street Improvements (lincoln to Main) • Commercial Street/Main Street Intersection Treatment a fi' Burnham Street • Catalyst project in support of the • Downtown revitalization effort • Streetscape design project will determine what the street will look like • Full improvements in accordance with the Streetscape concept layout • Project begins with design and rights-of- way acquisition 12 O& a ... ... .. c. • . . ... • Burntlarr ...-. trec, MIEMINNIII . ,...... ,,.. • • •• • ••,,,... . . ' ' --A. -,,i -.'ff--.•-••• : • • .,.i:••• ..• • • • • . ...--vil ..,, -i i- .,-, ".. • - . ... I . . •. :;...,.....„ ...,• ..••:• 1 . : .. ••••tv wa".,.; ,.--:..--,,, ,••• Ateir.:..,• •:- : - :::....:.,• --•:-.:•.:••••:...:-..,::::::,:::::::...:::..... .:::::::::::::::=;:k.;t!.,,,,,,.-- :... - .......• _ ,i i'ir .- ',..et-•• -• •-- • '- • • :. ' .''''-'....,• ..-•:••:::.0:::7"".:::•:::•:::'- i:71::::::::::::'::::!!!!:::•%:4:.:•1: . ..--- :, • --•••-...... .. . .. — ,. ' • '. .".-1:0:::'-:::::::::::.:::::.::::::::::•-•-•:•::::::•:-:••::::-:::•••::•::::: - : . ......„ ....., ... '.....: -•,• ..- - .•t --: 0 .- -• :::::.::::::::":::::::.:'::-';:"::.•.••::-::•:::•••• i-:•:.:•:::::::::::::•:•::•.::::::::::::::::i:: . . •• - --....- ...- .4.:--1'...' : ::•:'i •::47 ..:': 'ill'-. • i.!;:,::::::ii::.:.....-. %.:-:......:-;:•......:.::•.:.....:::••:::::::::::;ii:::::::::::::::::.::::-'14::::::-.4:::::''...- . twar:::•1:•.J..,....&i.,,i 7.... , .6i;.,1.+1-4...,-fl::;,b,..:„.... = •••-• :„.:.:::".......: : ::.:-...:::.:::.....:•••••::::::.:.::::::-:::1::::.::::::::::::::::.::::-::::::::••::::::.::"::::::•- ,..";,.:-.77,; ,,..i......,t, ..::::..,;:;:;....::-::::•: ::.=••••::-.• 17.:3;:::.:;.....:-.,.:::• •• .:. •.:-: -.:..::::::::.:::....::.::i::::::::::.::::::::::.::.::.:::::::::.::::: _, !,:k::.::::,• ".,-!--:::;.:••::::::.0.7:]:,.:11:1...'..::.•::::::Iiii::,:.::::::::.:...-:.:.!:.-:.7.1roo,i,,,1:11!:•:z.o:5 ".•,•::, 1,44Ak5:•154:21.:,:: :::.:::::::::::::.... ••".. ••:-.:?:::::::::.::.:•::::.:.::.:.:::::::::•,::::.=,....: ••• :: !:1-:::::::ii:E•F:::::::::::4::::•::::::::!:::::::•:::::.:.::... •:•••::•. ..::::::::::::::5:.1:2:::::::0:::::::::.:::::::4:::: .... :::5:11::::.:.:,.:.:T.•::::::::...!::......:::,.:...:::::: :.:•:::... ••:..:...:...,:•::.::::::::::•::::::.:::::•.;::•::. • • ..: . • ::::•: .."". .". •••• • •••....••• • • .. ........... ..... :. :3::IM:E.:::::.:::: :::::.:v.:A•............ . . ........:..„...:...:... ......................:...:......:...:.....:. .. ........:..o..::........n..... ' g:.':::1'.1.::::::::?.::::!:::ii:::k:';ii i...;"';ii.:::.•::;...:.':.:.•'....S...1:::.....:::::::::`?1:;.;::::::;:!:i::::::X. :::::...!:::::.:::::::::::!:::;:tft1:?.::•..4.::.!::::...::::::::.::. ..::1.::...1.::: 1 ' ''%.:'::.: • i : • '..I.:::,:, ::::::::::::::::::::.:.:,..::::4::::;::::;;:"::::Arlikeia..:44;:!.:":Qi.d:,,li j:f..„,...:.,..: .. ,..1.,.... :::.:.: wh,. . ...... i ,...., • • , ................................. ....... ..: '+'......•-•-• .•••• • • i• . • • • • • 1 -rillatli •••••,,(.1 f-,••,-;,...... •• • • • , • • • • . • I - - - . . • • • • • •• .....• - . .t., . , ,• • ... .• , f. 'oils. . . . ...;;;L:.: .....:4, ••:.- .... -... • .......,...,. .•0 . - •4•114V.f. i. :: . ,,,-.F11,11:.:1;:i2S.;::.f:..:::;:-j:i tliiii■-•;) .0:.:',...1::::: •••••':IP:::i0:.:0!0:17.0.a Lil :• -....•:.•-.,.. ::., :j:':'::::::::!•::••:::::•:11;.;;,:r.::...::•••:;:. ii# :••,:i.::i::.:..::-...;::.:!::::i'll: .......:::::::-...••••:•;,.:::::::::.:.:.:::•:Tii:::::::::::iiiki:i•4f---- •:•,76-4719N 4:•:::'::•-•::::...:-.-iF:"119: .4.i.;.::::••••i•L'••••••••:•••••••••••••••!.....••:::::.......•••:::::.:::nr .::p.::::7.:;1::::,:4::: ••::p•:::KENT•.-:::,:.:1•.:::•:::.••• ..., ,.„.,,•:,:.:.::: :.:hig:•.:.:...-. -•.::::;:k •:AlpiNktsi,....:::::::g?...:;•.11,....p.11,11,...1,--- • •721:::::.•i:3:•:::5 .:.:.,••q..5•21. 4-...1:-.1....• :•.,..; ii:.•:,:.:...• :-••••::•.!:: ••••::::::::,.kt, ...4,i, .:•:::,:::: ::2:•::•:!::::•:::::.:.:.••:::::::::::,•::•••••.•:;.••••:•:.::•::::.11:::::::::: ::::::::ii:D,..::.y.....-:•::::-:::::::!:...::::::.::::::::.::::::•:•::::::: :"..' %- ::.;-:::.:::':::-::::.;....:::S-.1.:::::::!'r!::.,1:!:::::•:ij::....::i.::...,.:::.:..:-....::...-.7,..:•,..-.....:.:. ... • • • •• •••.•..::::::..•:::::.:.•• •:3::::::::::::•:1::;::::::::::•im.oe:::::::::,::::::.;:j;:••;,.1:::!:.:::t.:.::::::•:::::;•:•:..• . I ,,,,t. ••.••••••:•••••••:••.• I 4,•• I , . . . r I .• .• .• .• .• .• .• .• .• .• .• .• .• .• .• .1 0 4 ,... .• C0r. , taint, 'a Rail 01.1' 11-11-,n .• Et _ _la • ent! • Ml111111111111•111111=11111111111■1111L iit.. .•••••, . . .. • .• . • .----• . .....• . .;: • V.'", • • .., •L-ite t< :.;:t:;: e.....".1.-•*:---- . . • • ea; ' <fr ' t •• • • • • 4,1'1:* .: , . ,a.:.0 ,,,,,,,,,..,:ec.„. ....„...• .... . . : ..,_ la ..:- ,477-,1 :.40' •-•.,••-••::,,i1 . : .• ..... ,, . f •.. •,...4, •••2• -4 :::•- .• .• .. ... . • ,. ,, ,,,-...:7 00.-.. .•••• .• .• • . • „. •-.., t...•••..,..•,.,:.-....- .• • .• : . . . .• : • • •• ••::+-. .4-•-•4 '....'''•-lx:' '"° 44 -4,t iir. .:eeP "' •' .• . : . . • ',:n,..-,^ • • .4.. , ' • • - ... . .• •• • .• . • . . . . . . .-• •- ••• • : • • ra•' .:9- .,-' .• .• ..„...,... „........._.... .• . .• . .• • • : .• • • . . ....- - • • • • riltriMi H'-1-' P Platform Locat atai•i a • [11 1 _ .• .• • " - • ik ft . . lr - .... " .... •-•Xt7.1.r.- , so•-.- .1. __ .: - :........ •.. I . : ::::..:...VY:trifINOz.:"".:':.•-!:•:::::::•,,;;;;:•::::...:.::'.::.: . .- __........ .• ::: i••• I . •.. . .• — •'••• .• • -- • - • .... . .• .. ..,.. .. .• •,:tAssi;:..x.:::::•::;:0. ... . .• .• .":!-VAit,... :41giNi::::%:11:;.::::::..-:;:••••:,.. -gb ..• # • •• .• .• .• .• .• .• .• . .• : •••:.k.,'4•,,k -4c.4.-.1'•••u-,i-. :.. : :.. .,'.*:.4..::.:,..::,,,a4,; .• .• .• .• .• .• , . . .• .• • : . .• . : .. . • :.•:. . . .• . . : .• • . . .• .• .• . .• • .• • ". -:' :- .... .- . . ..-, : .• .• I : i :::: * 0 Commercial Street: (LinctAn Avers.te to rwlain Street) ,..._ . . . j v Lexes.,..t.ir.e$,.• rtatrow :e..-..7f;:•3o! ,....„%ittin pecfesta::::::.tr-1 4:1:::::4tik:::... i 1 • * 1......e.g int-01.eway rreech:sti trorn k:stiter ........;T:tiiroa(:.1 ce. • • ••••••••• ••••• , • 1 •• i tip•itet I . • Gatevlav tre:::itrrif,...,...,witt....e...i.rt. ot siticeastis.s,a00.:i. 1 . .. design oroiect cr 9 • „„ : , 1 C orrunii!re 221 Strer?...t. 00010000 iii0000-000 03 faai0 01.30.00 1..(4.'<.'iii,etirii:iiii.N.0. ' ....il• .:*-- 13.010: ,)• ..itkalt,,,i0°*: . 0. 0.3 -. ....r.. '.....;;;;•.**1 .4. :...SAt.l.".., ...4.40.le - * :. •,. N4.. ..^.`•-4 A •.. ..• • 47,- .--....,. . t•'..% ... .:(:;!...*,;:14,...4....4:4.,:".....;,. ..‘. .144411. . .',..'";. 44 • .. N.:..."4. 4...'... .. 'k4.).,...ii.,..;74;W". --$:: 4t4.....• ' ••••7... .,... ..• .. .. ••. • •• .4 4... ••••,....• -. ..... * 4,'.:-, ,. .....4-!..-°'‘'‘ - •-• • 4 '..A.'... ...; :'4.....:.:' . ' ... .:5;:•••4 3.4 :::'''... *qt.*: '•1••••••::::".. ...7.1:7„....f.'-'3' 4.'• ..• . 4.-.....-7",.....4 .....;•••• ••4.......... !4.',..-,• 4 1191P4,',".$V,5...:7....e..7••.,r.,...,',74':';• ,1:1%C.rf.•••?. 4....,‘..!•••••Ali.- iv:: 7.i.';';:..44 .1.!.iv":.47,.....":":-...:.•.....•.•....,1•;••••. .44,1;::!,•4 :•.',;,.......,li 4. 4%.,E4'. -•.' 4;•.' ...4"•17'4. 4 4.•' s'''''.. ...:44.\.**** •'1 • ,,t'. ....x4;,...-::• ....r..:4; ...........;11, .A.:..J":•Akit43...• • ,,:::•••-:...c., 1.1,..:',::,...-1••:C. ' — ..,%,',1 -..=.11..P.,• .-It ..,,,,'.:.::,Wi,:-.7i.i.-E.,-..4::::.......-VN•4?):,.!Zi:,;.:::: . ' - .--::VO-\:',:'. ''''..,..... •••••!:"..0,......-!.-:',..;; ;;. ..\i•••••:'4. .N•N''.44, .., '. .... • : ......7 .'-•'.•' ••• ..:•••••• •••••!:Y.':::-,1%f,...t...."'..k.:. •••••:•••!•••:'!'' Ni0,01. ...0430 .: • • : 30 ......"-.. •• i. .: ...0000 000. 00 • iii- 0000-310 Main Street Safety Improvements 1 Specific improvements current y being identified • Staff wil. be xvorking with the City Center Advisory Commission and Streetscape • Vtiorking Group to identify concerns Projects identified will be designed and irnbleitnented next fiscal year 31 „re Ash Avenue Improvements • it:ire, r s s:(.1 r v .4. ;44.4‘34 '•••4 :••• ••••.•; fir's • • ••:•.; • • .4r:11::444+ •"*. • . , 32 • • . ` Y r f, ,• u i Wall Street ti • Construction of 370 feet of Wall proposed - Would provide joint access for library and Fanno Pointe Condominiums - Environmental permits have been obtained - Comprehensive Plan Amendment pending to remove one pond and realign Pinebrook Creek • Construction projected for summer and fall 2006 Wall Street & Library Parking :' _ [ - / 7 ,. '3.7--- 1 F i Expanded _ ,, Library ,I;� .,. ii��u.iin�iii�ni � f} Libra j71j g > ` l, Parking Lot 4 if » 4 '��I'' �"`'`. Wall Street y � M�II�,C`���ti-4/it 1 I R X '! 34 17 I i -------- ; . ■ . 1 :•• i . 1 W a I I Street i 4 .......... 4 - • .. . . •..•,..4,.,..•.?'“. . ;....•,..,,,-* . *.•:t.'•,"... -- P 1 7174'''...."'r.....1: .., ::•'..,,..ki2::H.it,AL - ;:21:::::.J-1;.;11*1.11::;:l.1 i. • • • • :: 1•• :4 • 'ilii ...• ..• .':.....-. .-.!"."f:4f. :-4' A.4.. •::zy, A. :44. 1-... '' -- • :• . - ':"...H:24.777:17. ,•,,.. •,--..,',,-'.. .. 4....... ,"7. '1 n! a14.1:::0••••:•:•.j:::.•••::..'f,.... -.''. •..:- k"::-....'.!. ..t.:1:14j..,..1'!,.....-,17"1..L' '.,, . • • ... . . -- - - :. . . PW77'..'%:'7....--:'.......7.-.7......•.. .. ....:...... ...:, .:. ,••'...1.,::...!".,.:,r q:„.:;.,:e ;........;.j:..:..........„pr.:7.1i7,.oti.,.,,,,:..., .......,.:- ..- -• •.. -.:....••••.-.- . ...- - : .,..:..::....... ,-"....''.. -:-.;,;:lt 4.4-,...-:,-...:,#:.7.,..-;-lisw.,.4..tv • - ::-.-% : ' "•-•-:--!:-....!-:-.:-1:..:;...:.,'',.;?.!:-;i,d:.N.44P.2*.lt•-•4:4.!..1'....ir•I'.';%-•.44-474- 1.011,11WRIV7I,W. .: ...;4;--'.r.-1,;;;;Pit.....;:.:..,.:.,.....,:-..!'..i-..,:,:-4.4...-...•.:4::1.........-..,4.:p...r.f... • 1 ;...:1;t....:1•:::::..4g r::.:w:ro,,..:,..!:-:,...,,..::-.:-.-vx.:;-4,,;::i.-.:.,0:m.:...:. -.. • •• • - :r.::-.410-4: ... 14: -...•Yr'-'1;•01:••.'..- .-, :1.'"4 ,,b1. .-....,', :••••::::::.::::E•4 .1!.o.N...:::...... ••••••••,...7.;:-',... ..,i,1:.-!:i' .--:, -•-:--...,.IT...•::. li....:.., ••." re,74,a' .:M15.:.-' -:". .4.•77:440 ,-...4.:1.t.4.::5-.4: ":"::...., kAti •-•'-'• . •••••.:i...e:,....ft.:..Z.,..:::74 .i--- . i - ' • . :".........::::::::::::ii 4.......:,TH,::tize;.?"-A.I.Y..-''"'-'•;..;..:. ii••..:::::.:•44:::::::::'.::::'..1:::1F.:::7';!•.. ..! -'-' ' ''• - 1....;;;4:4:2•iii4..iiii:•:::::::A:ui;•1/2,:r.i.ni.,•::::: 1 % _ _...„.._ 1 •" - - • . . . • - . . . . • . . - . • . '''....•....- ...... High- 9Wg tuil untai ......:•:••••.... .11 "'""1111111MI11111111111111111111111 . :• • • • k: kiaht-t.i..10.1 1,.:..-3 Ile :• • • • . . - !I• it•--. ..: .., • • - •-••';.:-, . . . ...% i rri D 1••(...)V(:•,[II e n t . . : . ..;. •:;i:".,:,.. :• Ilf :• • • 3W--- I .. .4,7... .4. . 4 • • • '7 I • - - . , .1 /.. 'g •- --- .. • --.."....41"."-- • A - •—•-• •. ..-A,...:It ".........- •;e:"4: tr • . .1., 1.4.4....1 • 1 : . . • • • ``''''''';4u....,;","„:":ii:-.-•.*: . . • • • • • . . • ' Ni• •-•••1 •••:...tei:'•'.''' . • :• . . . . ,.. ,-,A .. :,,,::::,...,-• ,....••:,..•••••„:::...•.:•:.....4.-..,::::,. ....,:•:v. .••• • ,::::::::::.,-. ••• • ••••.• .::-....:• ::::::::::i11.1.•;. .---- • . ..•':-:::•4i; •• TAY:0 %-"*.'•••':•.•'•'..•°.:'..1,,,............... -' .; . : ..J.P...r.„4.:j.if:::••,,F.::.iiJN • • :•••• • :.:!!::::::01::.1 • •'`''''•••••;•,;:•:Init$1•al.....•.• • • •••.:.r..f:::1*:::`:.!..-":::-..-: - r.....•••:' ft,e,: "2.-....•..,,„..... :••• i ;•-•*•• -.. .- ::: t 1 : . • • :• • ..... ............... ...... :• • • td, ;x • ;,�. t zf Pavement Overlays • 68th Avenue Parkway (99W to Atlanta Street) • 72nd Avenue (Baylor Street to 700 ft South) • 79th Avenue (Churchill Way to Ashford Street • 100th Avenue (Sattler Road to Murdock) • Pine Street Reconstruction (east of 69th) :rye Pavement Overlays • Upper Boones Ferry Road (72nd Avenue to Interstate 5 • 136t" Avenue (south of Walnut Lane) • Garden Park Place Loop (at 110th Avenue) xr • Durham Road (Summerfield Drive to Serena Court) r3V K 19 • ....._ ... i. 1 . l'aav i S ' Ave nL_ I rkW 1 i ......,—, [ ...... :, ....,....". ...„.,,,......iii.. , .. -glik- --"-.....:.„,.......... .... ..* 1 : g ....'-':• :"" - .,-:....,' ..g:n....e..14Pb.r:.:.. 15:,,S.0.9.I.,..4....- .,:,i„.:;::.....F.,:edlt, -.:-...c.,,,,v-•::::::::70:111:: ..:,112:1'1';:*::::LI gi'.'5,,.. .14,,,K*. :".4t.i,47..-Rit .:3,..-0,1.4t, .4::Vg.eitAilfiTIV .E..........inliiii::::.4.:.,1.•A'-- ...;:...g.::::?4,.:''%Itz::::...,!V.:i.itiikk.,;;. •■■•■3.:,:::-4.utt%.„..:•%.11.4...r:Filf-::;::::,:ii.%Oia:fgrq'.:14:::::: ligAbliidi;:i711,::-:....'''<.'.7.,:-.;.:•:;:::?. .01P:':'..-,...:-:.:.F.;::::4::Iir:Ig:%1A;;Ihri:-...7..-•pulanit:.::..-.....:.•-•IM::..,.....4.1:;:.i::::.::.:::....--.. -1... ..! •••••,',-.--'::•:•-:::%.9•:.:..10',.::1::::::::::"t::.-••::...-.....,.::::.L.:.,.,;......1..,....:....;:r.......,:::. . ... !"' .,:r.:::''',.:9::'...-:OrIP.1.:45■;a:Fi.."41:-:.'''.:.":::::,:qi..1...:-::.1"%:::....:..::,:2:4::::...::...:.:.-;. ... " I • ' I' • [ . . -:•:'-':-....,:::::.::::::::i:::,:i?.....::':;..1.::4:7:? . '..:.:',...4 7,:;::::.:::.:i......;:'• :......'.. :- . — ' • { .• ' . • 4•111t ..: „ . .... ...... 1 .. . 1 ... 1 ., : . 1 .4 1.1•1111111111101 - . ..... ,. • r '.... •'.-.'7 i!.4.:1:3;S" Or;.:iiriti... rig•''•••' ',f.:,,:i7 --. •• . ..• • g:,,fp*.• ..r.s ..,___...,...:(.:, . . lw-QW:';.•,`..7.....-....1r#:..i.i,iird,W , ,-...;:::4.....ye . .:,:t....,4.Ips.b.:. • . - -•:,.....,.. . I. up . i - -:.. ;:te..,,,T. ....:.. ... , .-.44. .... .. ' • .,;-.121."1 1. I 1,.•• l''''.•:!" ... 41;1'' -;;I.X:-.!.:::.7.4.'''''::'.. ...": . :ii.;....s. !. L .:4-::....ttleg . • i.•• • •:.: ....4„....T.. " ......- ...,:_,•,,:,...,,,40,.....E. . -.• ...::......: ..• ! : :•,. - . • , - • iNifigii.i."•-- -..)::::A,•••". ::,.,,,,?•:• •,• •....: 1 1 2.,.:,.. ••:-::. .. ....... ._••••,-* ...._i:-.•::": .% '........ .*:4f:./.,x,11:134.••:2::::4-: • .7.:4.1.. `-':-,7;:r.:7,.-4....;..,„, . . !,‘jo. : ;tr.:4.. ‘41...3...:.. . • .aillek ::t.. • ''' • —-'-:'" . •...,....i...:::..;,.0 P: .........4.J;..--, - ..: •-•...-,...),,,i., . • ',...,.,...2:1.; . „„,A.HkP :OP+ it...,.:: ...;';:'9,'U. 4.:'1*;:-.P.J 1 • t.::: 5.:: IF;4!1.41 :-...11:i: • . - • • • • .NNTIII efigq.41.,-- --:';".:::. '..::::: ,i, , --:• . 11., Zy',1 •• •.1. ...,:—..... rs ..;:;,, 1 . 1r• -- • • *4:.'... •:.1...'"....7 '' ..:.::::....,‘:::.. :.:........:,;:77.-.--..f7,...-,1:7.• ......• • ::,.„...„... ..;;.. ........ .. -...........-^.;7!...-IT.. .;.- -.",.:::::": •: -..........7.•:::::::::'•-:::.....-'7;:7:6.;..-::::•-•;:* ' • :-L•:::::.*:-• .. 1-•'..--:17..:40---.:::...::..z..-: 71:1:11 a ..• •-• ••••• • - ... 40 .: ! ............................................. I • Piric it • _ • . • • • , . • • . . . . . . • .• • ..• . . . ..• , • • „, • .. • • • .•• • • • . : •.141k ""17,o. ,• , • • .•• 7ar . • .•• .•• • • • .•• • • • • .... • • :...• ••::•• . :••• . • .... ••• • :• ' .•••• •• • • • • •• . 41 17 th Li ki 11 LI•(.!.• • • • Asia .1■1 • • .14 ••• • . • • :; • • • •r•-•'• %-''• .11 , . _ • (ftert'.. . . . . I.. •• • -- •. • • •.: • •-•••- •..• • • 42 ..... . . • • rys "k. Traffic Calming • O'Mara Street (Hill Street to Hillview Court) • Ventura Drive (east of 72nd Avenue) • 114th Avenue (south of Gaarde Street) • Fern Street (west of 138th Avenue) • 106th Avenue (north of North Dakota Street) Street Striping • Sequoia Parkway (Upper Boones Ferry to Bonita Road) • Canterbury Lane (99W to 103rd Avenue) • Walnut Street (121St Avenue to Tiedeman Avenue) • 71st Avenue (99W to Spruce Street) • 72nd Avenue (Hermoso Way to 99W) • • Other streets to be determined 22 • • • .x. Sanitary Sewer Projects Citywide Sanitary Sewer Extension Program • Proposed projects include: — 931d Avenue (at Mountainview Lane) - Ann Street (between 121st and 116th) - 87th Avenue (north of McDonald Street) - 97th Avenue (between Murdock and Pembrook Street) - Hillview Street (at 102nd Avenue) - Fairhaven Street (east of 115th Avenue) 23 • •: • L FY 2006-07 Sanitary Sewer Extensions Sewer Project Lots Status 100th Avenue 21 Planned Ann Street 6 Planned 97th Ave/100th Ave 21 Planned Hillview Street 6 Planned Fairhaven Street 19 Planned 87th Avenue 6 Planned 93rd Avenue 33 Planned Subtotal 112 Sewer Projects • 79th Avenue Sanitary Sewer Outfall • Benchview Terrace Sanitary Sewer Access Road • Sanitary Sewer Repairs - Commercial Street - Red Rock Creek near 69th Avenue • Sanitary sewer plan to reduce infiltration and inflow 24 • • Storm Drainage Projects Storm Drainage Projects • 79th Avenue Storm Drainage Outfall • Culvert Improvements - Derry Dell Creek at Fanno Creek - Derry Dell Creek at Walnut Street - Red Rock Creek at Dartmouth/72nd Ave • Highland Drive Storm Drainage Pipe Replacement • Hiteon Creek Riparian Enhancement .50 ; 25 I i — - • . . . . . . . . • • . : . ..••• . . . . . . . . • . : . ..••• • . . . . .. . ..• ..• ilputh A- n Li c: • • • • • • ,•• ,.._ • I "I 1 ' ' rha6. ,_ Ro- • • ..• • • • • :•• . ..• • • oh';:.. ,,,„:.dr,,..t,„_"...,:,, ,.:••• ..A:.. . 1 .. `,•••;:.1..,:r) 1..i...1 o...:••::: Itir • '.,. ........-t;,..:•::::.-•--r.gik..g% • 1 ••::;:••:),I.:.....,•.:-...V....1 ("4,4 1;;;..' • ...: ;•,..... - .: 1 . ? ‘t:.•,;:•:::'-:;.::•%::..-:•'.. .::j.•:,-•.....c't.,•,..:•'!-..•,. ...• -.4'4.*:••:r A2.--■602•:- •:.i :'.1 ri T .. ,y.,, :.. ii 4 -.:„•iiNFC4);11,;.,. ,..... 1 • itt•',. . 4/.Pity4,4,,,: • .1 . .4 t ,.-. .,, • ..' :J #.;;.:',-;:. 1... • '''• • .1. ,••,......,-* r ,...,g A-.-.fivo.,4,,...• .. ,tr: if' ,r... - ,:-.7,,••-•-'. 1.1g-r,..,4 , sq7-71,,.,..471.:- , .._,r',....!,......7-..:Ir -..4. . .,...tr ..4•.:.1.* • ....--. '''. 7.4.4.4fit: • • • .••••41•414KH*.N.".• ...444cAl.:-:.;:',!........•- ... .. •.. :* '-'•,..„•-, N:,..',--4...,,,eti r- • . Tr.7tr,:!..t,::. _ ,;,,,..i--,..,:it.1 v:,.:;.::.: ..•.•.:.. "....P.ili•*r:',0.- .,il,f'-I .„: ^ .e..,"-..• se*tf.:4;"' 1,... , -d 7,41 L. ... • "• „•'.,--•-.: ';;.;4: ' i •• • , 4v, . it,.. •.• .. 51 - - — — - i •• . , i • • .. • • . .1 • ••• • • 5 . •• . • k t - -' ''''':I -. ' i t ..• ••i• C Li'.' i-t , . n d L..... .....—-. . • i• :.:..4-:1;:k7: 11 :s:'!:: .' * •* ;!;;;;;;;;,::****PA V":;•:;•.7.•• T'''.;:.'.... . . i • . iiili:;1::::iiga:::i4r.r - "r'3..iit 31,7..tiA:.:. -A i':•::.*:-..F.,:l?,-.:: I 1•;.?""1.:FinP:ir.it_::3. :1 Illif'•••:-..:'::*:.•.:**1.-'-...,;*:..:%'.' ... ..;•... ftor."'. •.. , 1*.:Slint.T;;Lr..,•::':i. . t .'t .kr•ri '•':1' '‘...:*•-le -• •"';''''...:..... I • •• ith_thtthitt.t.trt :Oit•i:':•;:::•:!•::::•!;:::::::,:!:t.t.: i :i:::54: :::::1i4,T5itts: .--.4.Fol•-i,•:.::::-.',:.•:::::,,:.: . • . . •t:::::!::::::::::!:.::•::•:::::•A:N4 t • . I.c.p tt a c:it:n t r....:!tt I,.. -.s..s.•‘: :::Fir.,::i .! ..- ::ti.i.:::07.;:tit•tej,i--7;:z..,•44. 1...:„......i.1/2....4, ..• ..••• ..•• • . ttith I.h • • : . . ••••••,•....::::: t.:::•:..:::th::::.: Apti.,4041 itt:ttpoi.....;,,,,ok • •--•:---••.-.. - I I th:it:i....•nst.tt.n..-,h p- . ... . . .... .. 1 --,ALL.h.,•;:j:::411,,,,i.,::::64.1t.:,.:*,:,.:...:.:/,::,:,..tot:t 1 in En th.......h.ntitt I hi Eth t•Ittr, .otto.,:it 01;141- • i ....,.:. 1,AP. :t.::.;t:1"; • -.t ' ,-,,-...., -• etr - • N:- .. i;•,,tvil y-; '. 7 i -i;,.X ii: te • .4!:....,....-. 5.;,-;..;.. s• '7:•:;.:5•:,,‘ t'........• 11.2:;.;.:.:4i.::—;:liikl ::::.-3., C:.::: 'c:'. -.: -4.'''; ::.7, •-...-- :..... . •• - 14-4:s.....•.t: -• ••••+:5 i• .'°1- i• .......... .',.... • H ighland Drive . . . •••••••"- -• : . - • -• -4•• • - '...;•••.: ••• • • City Facility ProjeCtS 54 City Facility Projects [public Facrirlifies I ••••••‘ • r –• — • - • • r. • Senior Centre Rem()csio anci Lipgracie • PD Undet-orroloild st()rar.Liiiie tariik Lipgradc_ refil0Cle,••1 • •• • - •"", •'•: " • 55 Public Works Consolidation . . . kinks 1.1'1 . -.••••fr%,;!...;;;;;•_,:l."!..;_;•••• •••:••••:.'.14:.„ • ix•-•-••• ••• • 4 ;•••..ii;41:7***•••::::::::::.•:51;•ii-r•roirioiroo 't* i !irlinitiltifit:1.1411:11t."...:t..* : . • • 56 • • Senior Center Remodel ..• •• . . • , • •, ..• • , -4...41,r 44. •. r • tit:v*4. 4. ••• • • 1•••• • • • : - • . . . . . . . • . . . ..• • • •• • ••• •,•••,••,• • . . 57 Parks Projects 58 * [-- - Parks Projects NorthviEnN Park. (:She!ter and 1,-)ath). • Fanho Creek Trail f-roryi giva • Tualatk-: PedeStrian Brid0(::;.= • • • - • Washington Square Regional Center Trail : Skate Park (from donations primarily) Tualatin Rive.r Trail (Cook P.i.:•.irk to bridge) I — Park land acquisition 59 Parks Projects . .• .2:60114 6ner: iiii-,959596.506,9s5:9999619.9956.79T999 9000669) :...sn6699.9195.9.9199,499909:979t599.999199594 00 0s,t1- 990reta.sAJ "C4IMVEW rr9999:4559:11.55 co n 1.1.icr.: n '4;4'19'719-4' 60 • • Parks Projects (2..reek para. a Trail a . • • •••••-•••:-I .. •• 1 • 61 - • Pcirks Pr(pject.F; 1". • ••••:•• dp1i&1iI!IIiIi •It.:• x..•441.. * • 1.•;:•*10141446. *'" 62 662:: * .. Parks Projects • ..... . ••• .• . • •• • • 2• •.• • • • . . • : . . .. 1-?•••egic):-,,••••-••11 : • h,„•••• . , • . • • . • •• • • ,•••• • . I ••••• • • . • . • •••/ • • • • • • • • ••- • • • ... 4 . • .. •• , . . : . . . 63 • , - . . . • • • : . • • . • • • .. •• • • • • •••• Parks Projects • • . • 1.• ••• • • t'vii4;:.• >.*::* •**:'•'.:*•••••••• . * • * : : _..:1•:••••:••:• . • • .. .• .• ,• F.74 ) 4 . 1'44" • ,• ••. *:kw • 4.4.; *:. F.).al-k r',111 6 4 . : .:.•••• • • Parks Projects 4Jet-'t-Nt. * 'f; 4f:4C0 .4%." . . = 33333 3, • 31,••••„••• 333 _ . . 65 Water Projects • 66 • • • Water Projects • Secure 550-foot Reservoir Site 550-foot zone connection to Beaverton • 550-foot zone — 10 MG transfer pump station upgrade • Aquifer storage & recovery expansion studies • Water line replacements in conjunction with street projects Water Projects • Lake Oswego Feasibility Study • Menlor Reservoir Recirculation • Replace Well House #2 (Gaarde Site) • Telemetry Upgrade • Existing system is out of date • New technology will allow for continuous monitoring of water status • Miscellaneous other water projects ZOZ 34 • • ASR Procitiction , • • ••:!' ••1(!.".4!;4' • ••••••747,;.713.•Ziit.::: Pit,• ••:•••••?;;;;;;;;;;;:::-Ji':•"44••'''..;;E:::: • : • • • ••• • • •:Y:••;O. xEx 144. *IOU:* • ■•■$ 1' ; ' 1 . . .. ...... . , . ....... . . . . . 69 _„ 8 id • • CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes February 6, 2006 1. CALL TO ORDER President Padgett called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Tigard Civic Center,Town Hall, at 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: President Padgett; Commissioners Buehner, Caffall, Duling, Haack, Inman, Meads, Munro, and Walsh Commissioners Absent: Staff Present: Tom Coffee, Director of Community Development; Dick Bewersdorff, Planning Manager; Gary Pagenstecher,Associate Planner; Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer; Beth St. Amand, Senior Planner;Jerree Lewis,Planning Commission Secretary 3. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS Commissioner Meads reported that the Park and Recreation Advisory Board is working on priorities for Capital Improvement Program projects. They are still working on funding for the skate park. Commissioner Buehner advised that the City Center Advisory Commission is working on priority scheduling of projects. She anticipates they will go to Council this month with the first round of prioritization. Buehner also reported on the Transportation Financing Task Force. She said there is concern about improvements the 99W/Hall Blvd. intersection. The Commission will discuss this at their next meeting on March 6th. Commissioner Duling reported that the minutes from the Financial Strategy Task Force indicate that the Task Force will present their final recommendations to Council on February 21St . Duling also reported that the Committee for Citizen Involvement will have a joint meeting with Council on February 21st. Commissioner Walsh advised that the Planned Development Code Review Committee is trying to wrap up their final draft before going to Council. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—February 6,2006—Page 1 • a , Commissioner Haack reported that the Tree Board was meeting tonight to discuss the heritage tree ordinance. 4. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES It was moved and seconded to approve the December 19, 2005 meeting minutes as submitted. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0. President Padgett and Commissioners Duling, Inman, and Munro abstained. 5.1 ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2005-00009 UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE Continued from December 19, 2005 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval for a Zone Change from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) for approximately six (6) acres located between SW 74th Avenue and Upper Boones Ferry Road. The subject property is currently developed with outdoor storage and older industrial buildings. The applicant envisions developing the property with an office use, which is not permitted in the Light Industrial zone. LOCATION: 15920 SW 74th Avenue and 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and adjoining properties. WCTM 2S113AB, Tax Lots 200/300/400/500; and 2S112DC, Tax Lots 1100/1200/1300. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well- integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.520. Ed Murphy, 9875 SW Murdock, Tigard 97224, submitted a letter to the Commission asking for a continuance until March 6, 2006 (Exhibit A). The applicant has agreed to waive the 120 day rule. It was moved and seconded to approve the continuance until March 6, 2006. The motion passed unanimously. 5.2 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2005-00007/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (PDR) 2005-00006/ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2005-00008/VARIANCE (VAR) 2005-00091 CORAL COMMONS REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval for a 1.6- PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—February 6,2006—Page 2 • • acre property for a 14-unit planned development with detached cottage-type condominiums. No new public streets are proposed, with access provided by two private drives. An approval would require the Zoning Districts Map to be amended with a planned development overlay. A variance for the rear yard setback is also requested from the required 15 feet to the proposed 10 feet. LOCATION: 9400 SW Coral Street; WCTM 1S126DC, Tax Lots 4100 and 4200. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range.of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.350, 18.360, 18.380, 18.390, 18.510, 18.630, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Commissioner Inman recused herself from the meeting— she works for the applicant. Commissioners Meads, Haack, Munro, Buehner, and Walsh reported site visits. STAFF REPORT Associate Planner Gary Pagenstecher presented the staff report on behalf of the City. He advised that this proposal is for 14 condominium-style units on a single parcel. It will be a cottage-style development with a large common open space in the center. There will be 2 short access drives and pedestrian walkways to each unit. Staff recommends approval of the application. Commissioner Meads asked if any of the conditions of approval had been addressed yet. Staff answered that conditions of approval are addressed by applicants as their detailed plans come through at a later date. Commissioner Buehner asked about comments on page 14 of the staff report regarding variances and adjustments (that units 10, 11, and 12 could be moved to meet the standard and not require a variance). Staff said the variance is minimal and the benefit of the design offsets the impact of the variance. It allows for maximizing the benefits of the common area. Commissioner Munro asked for clarification about dedication of the open space to the City. Staff advised that this option is a standard in the code, but they are not proposing to do this. Commissioner Duling asked about the fording on page 23 of the staff report regarding visual clearance. Staff responded that the Commission can discuss the setting and find out what the impact of a smaller visual clearance triangle would be. Dick Bewersdorff noted that clear vision standards are exempted in downtown areas, for example. This project is similar because of the design and where the garages are located. Kim McMillan advised that staff took into consideration the sight distance for pulling out onto street. The applicant's PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—February 6,2006—Page 3 • • engineer has certified that they can meet the sight distance, which is 10 times the speed limit, or 250', in either way. This is a stricter criterion. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Kirsten VanLoo, Alpha Community Development, 9600 SW Oak, Tigard 97223 gave a PowerPoint presentation on Coral Commons (Exhibit B). She advised that it is a pocket community, planned development which allows for adjusting standards and allows for flexibility. The development meets all the Planned Development criteria. The site allows a density of 12-16 units; they are proposing 14 units. VanLoo went on to describe details of the project. She advised that they meet the off-street parking standards and will be making half street improvements on Coral Street (sidewalks, curbs, planter strips). They are asking for variances for a reduced rear yard setback for unit #11 and a reduced driveway vision clearance area exiting onto Coral Street: Mr. Pollock, Alpha Community Development, 9600 SW Oak, Tigard 97223 provided details of the dwelling units and the overall cottage-style living concept. VanLoo advised that this project will improve Coral Street to meet current standards. In addition, it will pick up all the upstream water and divert it into the Locust Street system. This will help to solve an existing drainage problem on Coral Street. VanLoo pointed out that the PD code allows for reduction of the rear yard setbacks from 15' to 12'. For unit #11, they are asking for a variance to reduce the rear yard to 10'. This is to minimize windows looking into windows and to preserve the open space area. VanLoo advised that this project is located in the Washington Square Regional Center, which is planned for "smart growth" development. This is the first project being proposed that embraces all concepts of the Washington Square Regional Center vision. VanLoo explained the vision clearance for the 2 driveway accesses. They are proposing a smaller vision triangle, but there will be plenty of sight distance in both directions. In addition, they will paint 25-30' of curb on each side of both driveways with `No Parking'. VanLoo said they agree with all the conditions of approval in the staff report. Commissioner Meads asked how many parking spaces will be provided for visitors along the street and if there will be stop signs at the end of the driveways. VanLoo anticipates there will be 7-8 street parking spaces and they are considering installing small stop signs. Commissioner Duling asked how much the homeowners will pay for maintenance of the private driveways. VanLoo didn't have an dollar amount, but said this is a condominium- style development and everything will be co-managed by the 14 property owners. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—February 6,2006—Page 4 • • Commissioner Walsh asked what the Code requires for on-site parking. Commissioners Buehner and Padgett answered one parking space per unit. Although not required by Code, Commissioner Buehner expressed a desire for more parking on the site to lessen the impact to the neighborhood. She suggested the applicant consider approaching one of the office complexes to have night parking for the development's visitors. Commissioner Munro asked about the storm water detention system. Jeff Vanderdossen from Alpha Community Development explained the system for the Commission. PUBLIC TESTIMONY— IN FAVOR None. PUBLIC TESTIMONY—IN OPPOSITION Mike Fisher, 9255 SW Coral Street, Tigard 97223, questioned if there will be sufficient parking space available on the street for 7-8 vehicles. He also doesn't believe the proposed vision clearance will be adequate. There is no parking on Coral Street except west of the project property — there is no parking on the other side of the street. If cars block driveways, he wonders if fire trucks will be able to get through. He urged the Commission not to allow a variance for vision clearance. He also expressed concern about drainage. Larry Zimmerman, 9335 SW Coral Street, Tigard 97223, agrees with Mr. Fischer. He noted that if there isn't sufficient street parking, cars will park illegally on other side of the street and block driveways. Other neighbors won't have the benefit of a vision triangle when they exit their driveways. President Padgett suggested neighbors call the police and have the cars towed. Mike Fisher spoke again about the parking problems. He doesn't agree that asking the police to handle parking problems is a good solution to poor development. Kim McMillan advised that public right-of-way is for access (bicycles, pedestrians, cars) unless otherwise posted. This is a local street with parking allowed on both sides. The street is not restricted for parking at this time. APPLICANT'S REBUTTAL The applicant testified that it is possible some units will have more than 1 vehicle, however they will be close to public transit and within walking distance of businesses. They still anticipate having room for 7-8 parking spaces in front of their property. They will work PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—February 6,2006—Page 5 • • with the adjoining commercial property owner to see if they can have off-hours permit parking for their visitors. Also, both sides of Coral Street are available for parking. Kirsten VanLoo advised that the Fire Marshal has asked that unit 11 be sprinkled. She reiterated that they are not at max density for this project. Jeff Vanderdossen discussed the storm drainage system again. They have a storm drain at the high end of their property that will discharge directly into the ditch close by. However, they will be taking extra run off from up the street and the net result will be less water going into the ditch and more treated water going into their detention system. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Commissioner Caffall said he doesn't understand the water treatment process. Commissioner Walsh still has concerns about parking. Since this is a planned development application, he wonders if the Commission can adjust the number of units to have more on- site parking. Commissioner Duling agrees with Commissioner Walsh. Commissioner Munro hears the concerns about parking, but thinks neighbors can work out the parking problems. She likes the innovative design and feels it meets the vision in the Washington Square Regional Center. She thinks the requested variances are minimal. Commissioner Buehner noted that this area is zoned for very dense development, and under mandates from Metro, the City has to have at least 80% of the maximum density. She thinks this development is creative for a Planned Development situation. She is concerned about parking and she urges the developer to work with the neighboring property owner for additional parking spaces and look at some restrictions in the Homeowners'Association. She is in favor of the proposal. Commissioner Meads does not have any objections to the proposal. She thinks the variance request for lot #11 is minimal and thinks the variance for site clearance has been addressed. She has heard nothing that makes her have any objections to the proposal, providing the conditions of approval are met. President Padgett thinks both variances are minimal. The applicant meets the parking standard and they meet the minimum density requirement. To deny the application, the Commission would have to make findings as to where they are not meeting code requirements, but they are. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—February 6,2006—Page 6 • Commissioner Buehner moved for approval of SDR 2005-00007/PDR 2005-00006/Zone Change 2005-00008/Variance 2005-00091, based on the staff report with conditions of approval, including testimony at the hearing and the findings. Commissioner Munro seconded the motion. The vote passed 8-0,with one abstention (Commissioner Caffall abstained). 6. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE PROCESS Community Development Director Tom Coffee and Senior Planner Beth St. Amand reviewed the Comprehensive Plan Update work program (Exhibit C). St. Amand advised that the Planning Commission would act as the steering committee during the process. The Commission offered the following comments: • The public doesn't understand the lingo or the concept. Not enough information is coming out of Planning, specifically regarding this issue update. • Need an education process for the public giving a historical outlay (what it is,what has occurred since its conception, definition of words). • Be more user-friendly, the public doesn't understand the language in the Cityscape. • For public relation purposes, say where Tigard is with its density. • When giving the presentation to Council, tell them how long it will realistically take to accomplish the update. • For public involvement, consider an informal setting similar to Council's fifth Tuesdays — something between an open house and a public hearing. People can ask general questions with the Council and/or the Planning Commission. • Coffee reported that Long Range Planning is fully staffed and can help St. Amand with the update. Also,Long Range Planning is funded through the balance of this fiscal year and will continue the same proposal in the budget for next year. • When Community Development meets with the Budget Committee, please schedule the meeting when the Planning Commission does not have another meeting scheduled. Planning Commissioners want to be able to attend the budget meeting and provide input. • It was asked if the unincorporated areas of Washington County will be included in the public outreach effort. Staff answered that Council has decided to stay with the current annexation program and address urbanization of the unincorporated areas with the comp plan update. Those areas will be involved during the update process. 7. DISCUSSION ITEM WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR—FEBRUARY 21ST JOINT MEETING WITH COUNCIL Planning Commissioners indicated they would like to discuss annexation, the planned development code revision, and the Comprehensive Plan update with Council at the February 21st joint meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—February 6,2006—Page 7 • S „ 8. OTHER BUSINESS The secretary discussed the Commission's calendar for the next month. President Padgett announced his resignation, effective the end of February. • 9. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m. / Jerree I ewis, Plannin: Commission Secretary ' r A EST: Vice-President Judy Munro PLANNING CONIlVIISSION MEETING MINUTES—February 6,2006—Page 8 • . . LDC Design Group February 6, 2006 ti any a Para company Gary Pagenstecher, Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Zone Change application Dear Mr. Pagenstecher: On behalf of the applicants, I am requesting that the Planning Commission continue the hearing on the proposed zoning map amendment until March 6, 2006. We have addressed the transportation-related comments from the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), and plan to submit our application, with the supplemental traffic analysis, tomorrow. Thank-you for your consideration of this request. If you have any additional questions regarding this request, please contact me. Sinc- ely, Ed urphy, £ICP cc. Richard Akerman LaRusso Concrete Kevin VandenBrink - Macadam Forbes Brian Bennett, OPUS Northwest, LLC 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro,OR 97124 P 503.858.4242 F 503.645.5500 E hillsboro@ldcdesign.com www.ldcdesign.com Hillsboro,OR Tillamook,OR Vancouver,WA Bellevue,WA Coeur d'Alene,ID Rocklin,CA Clermont,FL • • . , Land Use Application Contents: conceptual site plan slide images j 41 '' • --!, • . = ' '11,111§1 -771-' L'••• •-• i i ' ,::.•'' Ve'''.' .,-- ; :tr;k~" <"•'', :.,.. ......, ,.,,. . , - • ,,,,i ,.,,-; ,.• . I'l'i :‘-'•-!'-‘ 77.7-- -1:.* .•'' AMON Vie''''''.--+`' ,'i : •1 ..."1 .,I .P: r . . ,... . ,......t.„.., "c.1'1,f,",:.: ;,:.1 • ,,,,..;,, I ...1 , .... s : ,-4: : .0.:-.,,,A .... ..„ . ....... .„,......... , . • 1 . t-r . .... . ' ' ":;::.!.4.4 0- --- 0 r , '--,‘ • -7'!,r4;, ..... i4" ' ■4 .. '-"!.-----.4.‘!, '..C1 -r‘ ' ■,. , .:j ,,.•<.,-4! „ , :...: : -''''t. 1 'ji-,•'1.: ''',-1:'V. [,''' , ,;: '''';'' — .1 ‘4,.,t.! }r!,':k'C"Pi " 1L-' um --.:,; . ,?..&`wo__,',3.,--,1 4_unit ;---ID* a nned-d eve lo p m e nt . i: ;;,,,-:: ..._3.,„,.V.4.:A.....:..; .....C•!,:!Niii,„ '....:: 37..,, ,:ir ::‘:::,::::',:: ::: 7", , ,.... -....., v ...ft . If:-.,:frr,;k:,...Et:::::Tiii.2 -- ..- Igirip.T.—.' re:.- :,-:'1,1.,,, U. : iii41.? .tiR5n 'v.."':' ta':.''':4:::: '''!`•''\- i:illi'' '',1, ii-44.,-.0.-4:t I.: ' - -`, ---1 ...:,,,,, „,,,,?,-1:' 4,1:14•i,,,,4^a! '-- 7,..,:lf : i !fpf!!,, t*:,,i-i :: li •::=1 ; ! ' • ! '!!'!"- '' ' ';. .. Y!'1. imereib uary :6, 2006 :"...„.„, ..' .,,,... .: ,,,,„.......; . _ 7 ----.. -" , ..:_ ,,.. _...7, Ell "=1 :.....= ' :!, ! , i',,',"' 7.4_,...^.."7 v,-..;,:,;"i'::,'J•■ —71 ti." =1 .4 4 't i 1 •e ■ : ::!.1. I ‹.,•••.,,,,,,v u,,, 1,,,,0!I i 1 1!,! .: ' 4 1".! :,',1 1'!! :`' : ,!,.4,44::•..4; ,:"! 1.:1 L.:: `..7:-..,..,: + ,..., ;, ...:.,,,,:4:7:1-:.:, r7,!i7i ' !"; 1;,' ' ,,,,..7,,'!':?,'”4.."1--- '1.'...,,..: ,:.,.....,;;r!..,C. 4.■i!;*.f.r.. ..4:. :1•:!,:t.'. ^...:4........' - applicant: representative: Palmer & Associates Alpha Community Development 9600 SW Oak St. #230 9600 SW Oak St. #230 Portland, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97223 alpha tel: 503-387-7600 tel: 503-452-8003 : ,,,, contact: Jerry Palmer contact: Jeff Vanderdasson, P.E. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • . . .. .. Coral Commons • . . A G .eat . C •... ommunity in Tigard -' ' ' :"-' "--.4,- - "-44. '''' 44 4'4.4.-4'•--4-_ ,, . . Ity of Tigard Devel Compltance .. . .. . :::.... -.....,:,..„.,..„.... . ,, .._„....f....// „/-... - . .. ...:::............ -- ... ..:... 1 , • I: , 1 • h . 1 � —cont. r �, i • ill . IV ` I I F Pi i' " ,� � II• ilr . 4.. � tx .. .. .. �f a., .F,-w- C o 3 D.x i4 , _1 1 .444 .# 1' ; 1. s. r.. i .. 4 0 a fl .. � !Ili,' a Y L Rr. �. F �:e. L y. ppp •. - n y� .n;. a a ••S>;E:f ''- i 1,,k1,1k i..;:i;...:: ^-.:. ;p, ` . . City of Tigard — Development Code Compliance ..: . : • ..,...„ .. .... .,.... ....r„,„„r• • „ :. - ... „-,... -t*: .,..„.n.erra„,:-.• :r .rer,„_„, :r.,. . . r„,„,„,„:„.„.„ :„.„..„,r........„,,, ::p.e. .......• --,4......,;;•• . ..i.:::....: .:. 4 :;.. , . • .•':L.-44 k•,...." '4:-.4,4, "4-4,.... i'''• ' ..r4.••• '.- •,%.:•• 4 . ... . 4 . . . . ° Screening/Buffering st,andard 5-vimg ign ••• • ••„5":555..„5 • .7:: :...-% 777,-- 777.77,..7.'.., 7...„.::.. ....?.. '. ...- ce .........)rovides livability i ;tit- ..1 ttu5:555:55.55.555.„55:45v5„,„:„. ....i . ..„5„.•...,• •utg . .„, . ,it- „„i555,55i...iug„:55:555„:._•:, . . iv.5-55555 .„ -5;5 5.ii i .„.....g, 555.5. „uii ..i•itiittiitti., • ;i•ii• • 4,7 ...... .4.•:'.:L.5 ' e„.241.' ...!4.::■ ■••>V4'.... .+5:V;••Ve.. ..4144'444•.......,'4.. ....:.••:•.:.:.•• ::•••.:•':..!:'.: , - • 4 a.4: .•.. ...7''.::: .... ....• .4:4 4.7'4'...:4',:..5.44,,;;;•.,.;.:..'.•;:.. '::.•;:i:•..ii.:.:::.:::.:.::::::n4T,;7 ...-; '•;:-.....".7 4' •"1".=*4 4.::. -...,:44i 4! .4+,4'4•' .' •'•••'''..... •it fr.:144 0 cuff-street parking standards satisfied ;45givg..5„giu tug-55u ggit5.5 t 55::555-.45„5 „-,vviii.„;igt..5,iti , ::.:„.• f'"'',. , ...4:...4+(444,44.4!"...-,4.'..c.• : • .'.:..' :t•-••44;(•;•4•77.*• '.."•'::i..".A744'..: i; • v•4 vtith private garages v:i i„„:„ 45.5, ,.. , t.: ,5„...: .5:5. ....„--•: : ,......A.. ' .I .' .: .. .... '' • ''''•:•..' • ''' ... • •' '4 ''.......C' • ......Q44,4444:.. ..:A.ek,• 'ti":2 :::;:.ks...-„.....P.';;.:114.4.?..':.i......4:44''' ,4.*q, ..,,,,:..'e. . : • 4( .. L,•.':74i,' ..mr,--..i.4%; ...!,,:i.,...-,4.,,,..:.,......,...±..: ,s.,,..‘..;,,,,----,..;:;:. .. . . . ,....„.... ',•Ky'...k.-- '.. i414;44:.'"•Ilit.VIti. 44:. i,,,,4*".,J, ,I,;4•.:,...!-. • 4 ' ....:4:,.'.., ...'I:.:. :,......,..:1 ,.......1:.imi. ..,.. -.,..... , .,...-,A. "fr, ..4..r-• C...: ig n ifica nt on-street parking for .5 55... „„5.5r5 it,..trui .5, ...„ .. y •A'4--•• '1..i.:..A.I.;.:,..7.. ';'# ....«tr..".:4,!: If/. IFV.4,4e-4444*' .%4 — • ' 4 "' •••• ' ' •. 4+44 ..• ..4 4, 4144 V 1 S RO rs i ' Coral S ree,„ improvements r:'''555-5,5„ trit::„..„:„.55,...„„ii.g„„ .., •. . : ,-5.555.5,., .!...6,`,... '-:*±.W•it...::*.'4-:* ••'..; 4 •.;;..,.4.*:... ... *- ••:••. . - • : •'.. 4 l'. • ''''.••'4.;•'.4.*•!ri ,:',.'"'.. .......'„....::*".,..'.•::.'•.'..)..!.•;.....:.:'• '.....;, •*;,* ..:'::-.....,:',1:•: ••••••• . :• ";.t;;"44.0•1,2`.."° ...., . ,. . ::::'%.*:...-;.:1...1' 1.. :::!:.',:;:C•t.i...i.,;*>.,','..::..47:.......7.:'..-..........: : ::,.? c:'•...,.' :.'.'•• ..;114.4. • •.,f..1....,•,•.•.;4''".. •'..7..•%'..°2. t.AA.,`•,•'.! li.:.:',`•---..,0,'-•'-,4'.. ".';-,.. . •..... : ."'... ' ...-.....''''‘f:k;-'.: .. .4'.''.• :'..e:‘:iti. : j 71'.;:4•3'.; .';.•..•'''3.''. . •1/4.....• I Ti a g..„ „ II consideration for the rear yard i : ::, 5555,555„: ,55-t„gggitut„55:54:5.uturwizt*„. ..i,:g:i5 54.„5 t •.. . „,.... .„.v, „:„.5„, „„iv..tv„.5.55,y v.,: . 55....„ 5 . n• 1 one dwel inn '..1 „.. 1:4•••••4'..40 41 .,..3."44....",41f.......:5:,;4.14.;;""• -..."."-4..:,- .1 A;4 \... /414' 4..i 1 , —'•:4:4 4 :!.•`*.A..'''..."''...:,....,..I'..,'''''.. •:,,,A,:':',4.-..:. ; ',0,g 1::•"."-",, ''..1 1.,, c1/2.="1„,c.cc:"..:%,,t- • cc,.c:41-,';,....4i, .- ....4.:"/ -- • '..,. 1 .. '::,..''•.'Y.47".• i%.;.....--,;....- .i :',.-..-..,.......:.! :.....*,' : ...,;.:..• ' - ..; . ' 7 ...i, '1 g: all consideration for driveway ''''.4.re..!..,.- .- .!...., 4.• '4•''.•{`''V.•.,.:4`...'.:'., -'s. ,....::.-.41,:„ ...77'.' flf:r..., ..vt*-4,:::1 t 1...;;:''''''..."';':**r.:'*-,.. 1-2.:...:,.:4■.:i..0.:‘,...,..,' ,...f.' ..•..'. N..,...."- . ' •n ; ,; .5."," VIS1011 C lea ra nce area • •.-:::.::::::.::;.:::.. . . . . . . •• • •••• ..-,...: . . . ..• : •—••••:::• •::• • • :: . - • • . . ..•::::::.•iiiii.-.................:•.• •• • .. . • . .. -..... ..: • • • • • • • • • • • ii • - • • —•: • ; ......:.:: •. • - •• • .•...... • • • : . . .. . . . . . • • . :::.:::......:.:: ::: • •:A:. C. hi• ar: • -. ---„• •- ••• • ••••••• •• • o p13i „.Projectin„„•Seattle•••••••••••-••••••••••••••••.•••••• •••••••• • „ • • •-•••• • .• • -•••• . •••• :::„:„,..::::::::.:..•:.•:„.„.•::::::......:::.::::::::::::,..:.::...„:„..„,„.::::„.„:„.„:„:„:„.„:„:„.„„.„:„:„..,„....:•„......:,„.:,:„„„:„.::::::„....„..........„. . • ......:.•.. • • . .. • • • • : : ::: • . . . . . ... . .. ........ .. .-- ...„,_ --4 . ---c - 5.7: .------..... : . . • . ... .... : . :.: :::::::.::.:: ..• :::: r:T,. -,..ijiii.-...:.:....*A. 1- .:;t,.:;444$ .....• . • • • . ' L a ' '.'• '- a ' 1 1 ' '' ''''' : comm m 6 : 7:-.[ I i I C 01 1 ,...... .,.. '- r'..... _ ' .......; ,• ..• . k..., .t i.....t .... •. - • . '. ••••••••••••••-•....."....- :'••- .:. .'5...." :di ''''''''''' .... ••:i-?..'•:".c.'". .4'? .• c .• ..'-;.•-.; .. a. ..r.........::&... ...f...1:..!:......•'...t; . • : 1*' :ri.••••••• • •• • • • • . . ...... i" . • • • • . . .... .. ....g.i .6..... ,.`.s OZ. ,•. ..':;;;..''if ‘.- :C.' 1 • • ... . .• ------ 4 • . • • .• ....„..— : . . • •... . • • • • • . . I- ''.''''''. ' .. . . . • . •• • . . . - .... - . . .. . .. • . , , .;:; ;;.: .; :. , ; ... , ::.: 1... . : : .. : ,. .:::. : .... . .. :....... ..,-:.... •'•'.............'......."11.;....::.•......•1':.• ....'"...'•••. .I-1.4:' '5'''.....:' . .-. ! 1''...I.•:-*;11....1:-......ii7f,;,,..i,7.T.,1—•—.: l' -.'.-'1.. __":.:;:.:•. Wr • • •- . ...• . ... ......., ..• •..... . i 1 tb,....Amou •:,.. F A .„ . ,..., . . . : . .. . . . . . . . .... . ... ... ... , 1,.. .; L ., -; „nt ,If. c , , 1 ;If ...-.-: ii . ,..-„-t.... ... .....:• ........ .....: -::::.::::.•:- -: -..-...-::, •••• -..-•:-.-. ... ...-- ,:. a f ••,:::.. . ...:.: • Ike- ..... ••••.,q.''' I: .'.: • I C C.;;.,1 r L • _. L.A _ 1 U Li i-L.A. ...... _ _ t ..... . : : : ; • • ; - . .; ;; • .. • '...-1). i ::::...;:;:.;; . - i ;,i'..it• t, i,,..„. kiE•4i -:- : „i. , 1:417,::. ; -•..- ••••11.:::• • cc..... ..: •• .9.15:::• ...• -.......„....,:rg ---* ::. ..?P'•".'.:1. ..:. „.....„. .........„...„ •-- - . . . . • .:... • -. . , • ...- -„• „...--1,..-. 14,-*0- n.. • • 6:" 34: ; m........~1«.:.......)....4...... .? . ' '''' Cli' I ., . 7• ye- - 1:::-..: . if- • ' 4\ • v t .1, „ ,t... i„.. „ L.- LA: ‘,;(,)::; ....-; ... ;'' ' ; .0: LIN. • ' ill 4 ay.!i ..;;.', ..... . ' - •. ' 411i ; :*: 1 ■ ...• //' - •'...... • ."..... • .. .. . _ .r -- '......• • •...,'" :4,...,.$.;•,........,..rt, :., • j....,..',1.7...::::....•;;....,. ••-• -,,,. .1,,..- ,,, . •,......" 147.7..............•••44....vt. .• - kid....rj,,:'.A.. .•••• ..•••....1.1,.•..-' ......." ./.r '.. 1..'.'••.'.4".:,-:".•-*.-4,X-..1,4,..:.4.i.r...:. .•-.......i.:, ,, , •• : .:,',--;i..4!1''.' f• .s..'.4:.L':' ,,‘ .4'. `*...‘'.:.'.2:.,:•.' r-.1Pil':i".' „Ar;:i0:::':•:,..1. ,„. ..:::•... 1`..... • i :::::;....,;;*::.4.:...„,„.. „... ****'4.41ir'`..'"*7::..,....'••• . P....c...-•:••14 1-;t .1,*1110:Ve1 ,, ., ... ,. ..I... . . • - a e I i 1 ';'' r'''''. n n 1 t' --iical r ---,, ;.; • •• . .. . .... . ..7: tr.,-, •• :74" ''. ; E 'fr —... • 4 • • • •. C(..:01111 .. Li i 1 tLy ' •.,!...7 : - .„: , : ;.:4 Nt:::.:.:' •.! .... ....*.i.,',•;c:;:"..: ; 'u ';:•1'...5::u•v';1.,;;: ;; :;;4;;-—— -1;1•;'1°?u! - ;;•• •-; ... ;;;;'••••:;1 „. . L::::,,.; :k.;" ' . . ...s..:".•.•• ;..1''."— ' ".'"':::5•• .•'‘,••••Ji.;,";.4..... . "....:,;',4 .:4- .ii. ; • V' I i 1,' . t.• i ' ' 4 - t.. •. •.'. „....:'i,: 1;0 •—.4•"1.••'•• • ''''' 7;2.01 .. :i.I •i ' ?!.':: ..t; L ••• .. • ... . ,.;;:-....,::::.;;;;;;;;;-;;"..c..4 U.;.; 'Li.:LE • . • .::;••.:i,.....1.,: • i:`.;: ; . : ;:;;,,i ; '• 4.. •••••:L:L;4..• -;;;;;L:7, Itz,....:•.;;:'i: Encourr- -- o. ott--- -, . 1t, to rii., . . . .o. xi; :tot. •••••....tto.:. •:, , : .• . . . „ • , -J .:: , tt....t.„.. t.......- t ..- • 1 ..7:.,„,,:t.tti. .....,ott.t4••tt...., :..... . 1 .,11 i; ..•-...:. ....i.4:•,...ti...,....-..i.:::, - ...! 70Y.:?.....::::g14...:.•"-:. • •4...—:.. ....: •-•••• ... •••....!...$:.„J......: 7.1.',..3-: ..., r ' ' .74.....014.7,e,....4'...'....4P.•':':•••-•i: .''5.::•.• ;":,..' '••'1-:••-. •'•. :....,A.•... ...I%t:... ..- ...',.- ' .g.i`-*;,y. • . .',1 ..'..,.: ' m••$•-.. .: '' "At"•,t•'!.../...,,,..•- 'r 4 , *.:•• •.• .."'•.„,r??1.ii"-.,•••...‘.ii.m.... .., : '.....'.0,,,,.:.... ...••,.....F ..•..• .-4.-.1',..,-,';,' . ,,• •. i.:0,,„.„.„ „„„....1„.,&44,...„-„ ,,;,-„-..4,....,.•2.,..,...„*". !"-4.7„„.1.; ' :: ..„'...o.6' ."...6 6,....L.,,,,_....„..„...:,. Le...„,„4::°„:„.2„..A106.6.6 .6f 4,0'."6„•;U::„.„6„,...::::„•,0„:„.„.......,:„..........„.1 . • • • • . .. . .. Hast igs Green in ? s ,.... :,. , ....„, :•i. ,....„:„ „:::,... • . , ".In,:�, r 3 • fi 1:. '....7i,-.;.....j tit° a:. •ni. : ,, , ill..... ' il• i'•.::.......:. .:.. +fir; : €i , . J} : • " ', rc I•ice' ',...' cE.x:r. <:: • .r :.;. :•!::9!ee:tie:ee;: wn.:,:...: ^i{>z!..',i.;.':....;:•.��''-.'.:�:':i°:'.:� — •.ip:�'',.;i:e::� , 1.4:-.''fi ......u: >.X:: ,,.,. ' ;xt' .L�;:' ::::• x?0:. >vri r: t—j:._ oe•3(i FYI S.< .. :<Y:ij:.E..r.>sY. ;<.....:;:,:{a Y': M y r 6 W. •'I •.: ..." ''.. , ..•••,i , „..„.. • : ;.,.,:....,is�.':.n. ... ..... .. ..7 y� �'.• ' 1 . _ ><.......... <. ?rte;.. .1 �[ i1t 'T; s .:tLV':.•::'.: :.:Its,. :' ;`Fy::: t.i .4'41 L:'.::'ais ;.te::.:! r .: Y .• .: f 7 :'..r•. is . 'ti{:;. ":'i.-��:� •l..&r� 1....i .• M::t ' Y . .. .. • .• :........• • . .... . :• ' • ....>.,• „.,........,•.. . • .• .• ••: : • • .. ... . ...... • . .......• • • . . . • "4 - .•.-,...;.':•••••;.•:•;::::,:...-.. ••• :::•••-:`,..::-.4.....tt.:::•••t••••::.4 t:•,,,,:t...,......t..............-.....•. ..,. ..- --:-.,-..• ...t... .. .....::...........,.....• -. -: ... . • •.... ..... .. . . ...... .. .. .•••••••••••••::..::....:::.....•...:....F -. .as ... . .. .... .. . • ••• . ••••••:::HE........• ••••• . • ••• •;• ••• • ::••••••••••.....i....„...:::.::...........:::...:••::•... ........;.:•••••:::::...:•:..... ...:::::..4..............,,,,,.::..... .Re : ....... ••• ..:S... ::., •! •::::•••. • • .....•••• ••••••••• •••• : . sl e e:.:,••••11-;: •••••••••.•......:.............. :.....:..........::::„...::::::::...:,..„:„.....„.......:.:••••••::•.:...:..:......• .... ..:....:........ . . ........ . • • - . . • :::••• , ., ,• „...:::::•••• ....: • ••: :: •••••• ••::::-. ••••::,:••••••••••.• : •••.....:::..............,::....... ..... .... ....... .: .:•••:•.•:: .. .........::• : :.. .. _ ...... .........._ •• • ........ ............ . ••.. . .. :.:::•:.::•.:: . ... :.........: ••,. ... .... .. . ........ ....:••• ......... .... ...... .:: ::. ..:::,....:::.::::,:::::::::::::::::.::::::„......:•:::::.:::::::::::•••:,::...::::::::::::::•::::::::::::::::::,:::::,.:.... tot:,... .., „ : .:*7-,...-,-,•:ife..- :::,:.: :::„.... • ... .‘A".•• •••• ••h• •••.i.1••A•• •• I lking:::::to•••••••:•1•111 . .. ..:::.::••••• ••:::::.....:•::•••• •• •:••.::: :-• •• :•• : •••••••••••: • : - - : . •_•• •••• • •• • •• ........:.... ..........::........::::........,.. , ... ,...:::,,,,, ...„..,......;,•:.,-.4,„:„:„.,::*2..,•••••• • ::•,,---..:;,,,,,„.....• • • ... .. .... .. • • .• • •-• .. • ••• :::- ...•• ••••• ••••• ••••••••••....••••••, ••••••••• .•-•:•••••::::.........-:.....••••••••.....••••••.••••••.-........•••••••.„.:•............,............, :•:.•••.... ..'. ‘„....:..„...... .„$.*%::::ff:-::: .......:,'... ... ::,.. •,:,..,„.„-. .• ......:1...... . 0 • • . . .......• ... pei.•••e****ate itpine to tiver• -• • • :••• .... ...1 neow.,„1„.. .1 anit - .. . . :•. „ i .. ..'f.. ...'•••••'....-.'':.....*: .. -; . I 1'1)11 III' i ''..........4.7. '..,.:*.;;...1.1! •I'l, •11!...1..i.: ..'''.• 'Ili... i:i'l t is a i ..... .:•::. ....:....-.............::::. it............ .......:-.............: ..:...........,•,......:. r„, • . .1. ..,i,tx-•••,. -. tiiif:t...,....„ ti.„... ....t: .... • , , . ..... ., ., . • . . . . . . . . . :: ... ... .. . • . .. ... .. ... ... . . . • .. .... ..... ... .. .. . on ..... . .. . .., . . . __,.. .„.. .. - ifin. et p Olea.. ,h. .b. 9 r.s. . • ., .....--..--. -...:-- . . . . ..... . . . . • , ten• iiwe have. invi_. , • • i .. , • i• ... •• •• .: • iiint:„.•-:::,:rAiftiiiti:tiinititii•iiiiitiktiiiti- ,...t........................• . ••• . .. . . . . SPaa‘"*".)t••••• ...• • ***** :* *.* ..• • .1'.':...L14** 2'''''''''''"•••:...''...".....''''..:**•:.4'.'.•:ft.i''.•;49...........i •'*•'..)1'.....***...*:......11.'....':•••':'..••••.'"•*"1:.4*.:.'•"...:';.?..!V..;'4...".....:1•'4::.';'•:•';:.11'0.;..?'......1... .•. • • • • *. . *** . .........• • 4... *., . l• ..t t 4... ... •' P...•' "The . : Design ulls. ••....: ..• • 3? . .. . • . • . . . • . . . . . . . • . ...ri •ii.; • Tog ether... . • . . . . ..:. .. ...:.. .. ...Ht.__ ••• •:„. eiti.„......::„,,,..,,infi• • • •• :ii: .4141 ... • . : . 1,t • .• fi _ . • . . . •• • ...:,.......:::::;;• . ..• :".... .. .....r:'?!, 1.41. -I.:::.4 *.:*:.".' • estiritimate . i•ii. rl„Tin• p:rovi d . .. .. . • • ... in :,•••i: .' :f..-9.i. •,........ ik...• •• .......• . .. . • , . it • i . : • '11-1 le i : ....et . .. ..„....„ :•:•:•::::•:.::.:::•-•••••:::.•::.:•:....... . iii :•:::: •••-t . :1....iii.' •.:14••••••••ie itittik i . . . .. . .,... . ..• • • .„ ... . .. . . . . . . ... . •• .. ..•.... . .. . . • ••• •• • • .• ... . . •• •• . • . • . .. .. ••• i • • •:::••::::••:::.:.:• ::••.:„.: .. . . . • . •••• .:. :::•.::..:::....•••• ......••::...... i , if ,.• .. I i• Iti:f.. • - i • . •••••••• •••••ii::::::••••••: ::•• ••• . • i • .• :.. -:t.:::::-::::.. it.: ••• •............:...„ ..• r•• . • • • • •• • • • ... •••••••• ....... ••••.•• •• • , :•••:-: #1 :„..it if : -,-: .i..,..7"T,:.4.*:.r'''..1.,...:',.'.'.: : ,.......1...1.1 ; Spaa-.....• •:::::-. • :.:••••:. i: •:•:„...• ••::• ••• •••• • • •: tent: ••::••••••• i . r. .••• : ,f.iii i•• - „ii.„.. •ii i. :::.:.. *. -4., .. ... .•::::: : :::.--•i „irti f: •• : .• ii •. • ' i t 4,70"ttt.: • • tt t,........1, it t:....:. . t.......:,, tit:; jik .,. .i.de.:.......t...... ... . f t - ,.(1.t-t. - . . • t 4,) ti‘te. : Ea011Y- . t O. 1 nOlveotonanif.......„...,.................„...-...•.... . •en.:•::„•••••iit•-• .•••••••• .'4%.it..4:j.. .1.:.',7. ...: •i::. . i 1 .....:-.•• ••,• : • • t "Transitiar)s . . :. . . . .. . . . ... ... . . . . ... .. . . , . ,... . .. • .. . ...... . . ,... ..„....•,„••• • • . • i„ i . • . . . .. Domain., . • • . - • .,. , •••• • • ... . . . • • • • • • • • • • • . . • .. • • . . . • • • ... . ft:••••..•....., .. . , . • • 'It/ for indivi ' TirJai . •• • • 0 "Otfr)drtuni • _• :-.....74' ! ' ... , , - '.. .-.;..- • , ..... • .•.• r:*I, . :,- -..7 . mi . , /pit 0 •-, -. " 6 ' , -_,, ; ,. :',1041111"1 16"-i'Pe.it. ' " ' ,, r _ .1 • tb' .• ...r, r . . 4-7- . . 10 ....4.- „ve, ,. .....' .:N;e; • .. "". ..,i el. . I (0:t'...r.,. cf. -' AIME ./4 Aft ' * i• - ' I i 4&.!: - ' '' — . ' ■ — - j' -4.77:44401*. ‘3•110.?''C', _ '' .., ''.-.: ;',. g;`!''...i. ' - .... 5.: •Mr'- ,R.' . ..--' '.. -. ,;!..,--; . . 1 gir..2.4;"_;.-76n*'•4',",• Ar,74'..-e, ,,.."'-; - ---tia '-#1 ,sit_ . '1,.,..;. . ''-' • ..-4. ,,-,,,-.4) 4-'kr . ■ . Up," -.." • tear.4",16 ire S• • • %L Of,lit.' ;.. %' „.i- , .^ • ...• '.. - 7 gier•4 4. 1i, '44"7 ' : ''„ .,"..V.,...`,..t ■ ' I‘P'. .,.. ••-. . . -e 4,,.. sir.,s , t •...r.:,,,z4...;.1.4`,..;,.". , .- , . • " km.- —-It' -:-ip , . " . '''-,. 44 ,A, - ,:.:Ar. • 1 "1 `" ..-. , "- . _ ,N r • ler- • r . ;Ail/A% -..:".. • , 4 . " . "."•, '4.9*. .. ;" . • ,,,Li Ac.ifAvt. . . '.., 00... •..;i ' :4 .•00..,;It. 0- .4g.- • • - ,_ .,_ _ al.' ••• , • P -•' .. .• .1'.. ..!:.., .:- .0 ,. •: ..'" ..... .:....i., . -',1,;\"..,.:Vr. . • .. a t :,, t s ' ' -- . :41 '-,—;.:-..-7 -t 0,... ' • liff.„0, A 4",te -,‘• 47,ilt ,400.0 sq"„ 00 ;0;90f—on ....,.. .. . , i2r„ilz:Vt.45 •, •1„..„':::■,.,"*. . .I '"?•‘: ',47",,„ ' t, k__ lor--, .. i f7. ..W14 willeiwow.A...-„, „:44-.. , _ 1 "litr. all .. ....F...',. •. , —. - - — - s.* re.„—, t ... °, 4, ' .k-rt 4. 44X•Iv."1. 'F$0 . , ,v "4 A..• 1;............[....I.:0..,,i,... '4'4'' M. ,POPO all" 'MI* - 1.1‘'. .4f,. v VA,V4• A 'v i '.. ',,,,,,,,1.;....,...v'•.'"),v v„, •""'4'"vv. '1 , .vv.v "'• ' "., itir ." ' -: """ , . . ---- '''' ' •".v,,il k .' . iv" -.• • v„,. 1 ■•..10 •"" , 4% ' ir ••'" ' A.":,'" , ... .,4. ...,,le'NO'' ■ .4 .4"." — I '01 ". , I ' ' 47., 0..• ". " •4.4 ."1 ' 10 4 '-.. ' .. $ „ " 6 V•IrS60,61 i r ••"' ...' „,4 '' .: 6/.0,.•.• .... "*"""•••"•" ' I.'," . '•-:-•-.0:''"- -‘-' "' . ., ... . . f ' ' ter'76:%4:1,.`"Vir:ir76.6, „r6.1, .. ..•„,.,....1 s .. ..0:::;.NN:1:;1. 7:14 ;" 'i• ''''''`"r.'.,:114' 1 1 , .1-• ..! . *is' • ' ' n" vf Vi= v."416 V 4 .01 1V... ,••• . s a 4 , 6, • ..., ; . -! •" #114 , „ ..1...,, 4 • ' , , ..,„ . t,... . , '•-•' -0 iAt,;- , , 1 ,*. % , - , '4'4, ' 1., -,,,,-;..... • , . , .1.11..! '..• 1/1.11FI ii:"-V-L4";:'41 ......1v '''' ' e"..41" "k' 1 ■411:14. "1 i .0, illi,**if''AG,' ''''v• ' 4. ....‘ #Zfr A • . ,*'-',tr. .. ; ..... .M..:.3,41.;;.:'....,),.4::1,4 .: ,,., ,,,,I, 1., ..-14:& . .:, , ,,,,,,,,, *),J. • • • fr, . ,. jZ•tc. ._,.. 0...:04,1,61, * .`"1 101."-'- -`1, 11441174,64 -A .r` eiliftif ' ki, %.t-.- .-.. - 0'..11 ■..t.-_, ss. ' 0•0001,-too— r. -1 ' 4 V.*ft '`'''' '4-... 1 ' `I•6, , '' •41 4 :7;f i li,,, j;:(,,' , %6" '4".# 0°'64#'(1-4 6"4 ..61:'C':,", •'• r '14616"4_,66•0 ‘10•110. 04,7.....,- ''=, I,,,,. "s". 010 4154,, '616 • ,w - ' '>,t•ot 41 -0--4 .A 00' Y.0000..., i.,411.1,1 ,,,1 4 1 g• „,„„...., ,.._ ...-4,,i-:,--.. 7 , ..4, Cora CommoIris Site Lk, . . .. . ... . ... •• • . .. . .............• . . • •• • • • •• •• • ••• • • . - . . •- . .... .—.... ••••• • • •• • • • . . .. • . . . . . . .. . • . . . . • ••:••::•i••• •• :. • • .... .................. ........... ................... ..... • ... • .• •• • • ••• ••• • . . . . . .... • ••• ...... • • • • • • • • ...:•••.... . •:•..:: : . . . ... .. .. . ..:P.......°,......,.:..:„....... .,,. - . ........ .......... ....... .............. .. .. ..:::.... . . . .. .. , . . . . .. .. . . ...,........ .....,..,. . .. .. . ....... . . . . . . R...• ...• .........-- .............. - SW.00 AL-STF. :1* . ,. . ....: ••• • • •••••• • ..•••• ••:..:.... •• . .. • ••.•.:.:.::.:.::...:.:::::.:.••:::. .• ... . ..... ...... . .... . .. . • •••••• •• •••• ••• • , ....„ . . .. .... .................:.... .•••• . . . •••• • • •• • • ••. •,• ••• ••• ••••.............. ........... . . ... •• • .. . • • ... . .. ... . , • ....: •....• • . . . .. . ... ... ••••• •• •••. • ••••• •••••• • . ....... . . • . . • are :: NEW 11 eilalr....%V.1117if• finflif. Hi: . .: ... ............ .. , - New-- .: -lorl.••:-.. e 1-,..News n• . :illor,..- Asp,. • --- -: . ..*- ••,,......,: .; ".la.-- ge • ? " ..... . . ... • .(:4,ev:-. • . t.• •..'•••‘. ")1 ,:•.' I•A,.:•.`'''. '. • . . _ . .• t.,,• • . .. pi.::,... '.---- .; : Li.........,,. • . .• _...,- - - -...,-* •::$040 17i- • 1,.• • 'al"' ' - - "•• N• •N‘ 1 - - •. .z• ... ... .•••• 16., .41:.......: ''''1.1 P•' ° :':4:•`•.*...• 1: 41111 0 :MI RIR:RR 8'3,(P..51.;G•APB A 1.,,,,;•°!.: :..i.!..P...:' ..i. t..!!!.:::.• :•: • 17..."..:;-— .... s: 0-.7 MI . . . * • jp • P ••••••.- " • t• 4 /)..• - ., ..,• .. .• • ..,_..W: •I.... '''I - :•• ' •• 14..:,:.,1 .„ ;..'....7::..; .', •ff. 4 ' t... i . :• MN ... • .. • •.' 1!1::::;.: '''''. :6;;L:.. . 1 .:..: Mee .. . • iS ' ' '.• I..T.11!:- - ;;;;;,....:,... . 'pi. 11**, I......--•...:'. .. t1.": ` : , ...•.. RR RR:,...,.., NG.IN It t ti:I.R RR 4.•••••.';.R':R ,..; • .P:•.;•:.::r,,. •••••• ; I::::.....„gil .•• ......•:;R; • IN . MIMI ' • • i.. •• -, .*-- . . . :.. • , 1 ,c ..4 . .1,... ••... • • --,,,..I; %n ' • i Z I,t 1•.'" °I,› • 'PirtfeliNVP I C . .. •. . •. • . . . •• ••••• • • ;$1::41 ill;•r.11 •''' • .1. C 1-a•LIA • • • .. • iI........... . . • .pW.:111.1•:.1 *1 .,-.„, ''•• .le')•:::r ii.n. E.R:•:•H:q1 .011.At 4 :r:..-...•:: 0.: - •• •• :. . • . i • $.1 1.. ...• II::: I fi.‘:...• 41......... •;•.i. c: • • : : .a ?.,, '',,,, i..... '... ..***•••:111111.1 ,• ::4 . I : • .. ..... ... .• . 10%;,•'1•1•1:.,:f•.•:ri:4... '1 p • .4° '''• i..s„,, . .. .„,._ .44....!:. 1411Y. • /•••••:- Ki -' ' • • r. Al!'•:..';111e......:i'.‘ Idc",i6gai • •••"•-:'•• ••*-.•,2 "if 1/ ---,, ' ■''.:...- 07:; •••••••,- , •• • ... . . I': ••••,,.. : • '€.'•`' • R R i VA TRT RR;RR FRR r!....VRTI R.: R • .....--) :':' . • •••!.••••..i.• . ••• .: •4• 11111111111111111•1 i - .--TuRvitiR. •"7-•••i;•••:: .. - •ii .:.: ::••:::.. • •"'. • A:•1!" NW. min ,•:71.,,, . • . ,,, .•:...........---- :. • P A i i a WI.i 14.N.4;f r)V A r.:.Li • : ....... • •il;;;::,....: •..... ...:. 6 4 • ' 'It 1!!!.':.ii:i...:::ii. 1 i:•i.1::7:11:1:.. ."-- I: :451" :P:' -I • „ • . " "1..1::::,••41:! ..,1.• i i ::: .4:::F1.0 .,::0::to)-:•:::•;•••-• ,..1•••._4". •ii: . :..:: I: ..... .. . • .. ... .. . ir R , "e;;29I .iIill..i. • • . :: i ..P.1;i'•igli 6 1 • 1) l.4. • 1,, 11, 1 ...t. , .: 1t R+•.6. I +.... ,,,....„ .... , .:.6 —j '7....%:: . ....1 ;.., •\i,, . ::•...4. JO... L. '-it •:.;:lt•-" ... '• •"Nt • " •■tt-t,--sot[ -' -4,, ,, :- • • • ' .. . • !" ;:.4.K.' • • • . . . . . . • • . . . • • • . f "N . . . . .. rn n . . • C 0 n a ,....- -: 1, P i : ,/,)n • • • • . . • .• • ,... • • • .. : . . . . Jr.. . r'.• • • , • _ • t • v ..• c :,i0,:•.47,...• • ' ,' i :1 4:4": f •-b••••vA:••: . f -1 : :--. . ' •• .:... ••••,...,14:,•••i::,::•••,.:'.-;,....;,...,'`.....:.t•':'.. 4 .. .:•.`- - _ , :.'•• rf•(;e4.71 ( 1...-..:-.Y.s41:•:**---...H. ..:-' - --. if • •1 ..4.47 :'-..,....:".. ' ..i..' .• ."*. . y .........., ,. 4 4 ..• .: - -I . 7e'e* 4.1.::::I. '.';..!.:7:4::efc, i le,' ..=.• ,.(...7,1, i: '....::,:::-.1:,:.:„.t.„1:...•.- ..' :::::" ..:::' ,;.......,s e:::..:• ..:e. fl 1...;<6.::„.k..i ...''.!'.' - ...,, 4. ......-::.::,e(Q.':.:'!:'...kii,.......... - . . •• ,. -• • . - . f:'4..'...• -4 g.‘,4 •.*:..,0-4:'!::::.4 44 „, -44:4'......,4•'' ' tit'"4.:'..: .,i'l'.I .'4..!..4.4. .!...i.4, ;1. ii .. -. . ..-T--,...• -,...-:.::: - b..-i.1 4-• 1-4*opt: :' ' ••ii-il. ...•,•-,4.4 ..,,A,1 . 4,4-- .-- — - i .'44.',,,,,A,... -,,.....-...,..:414'.--,...-"...,.f.' . :, • ...:., .4.1 . - . ..... .. ....-..:..2.. - -- . . .. ,,,y,........:;:t .....,:,:, ... „,.. .._.:._..,....,......_ 1-..:, .„,,,,...?,. ...... • ,,,,tav, :.••C.i. • ,:,' , •rtr>.7::::. -•••,,,,..27 A..•-•-•-•''-- 44 ' • i .•:"....;* I )",-• ° . t••...,.. ' x 4 • • ... •- ......,.. - es and °Palates tile Cora Street to me regard t° • p an :norms ds sal The ,-,..'y standar c - -ei d streets ap risme Cora 'no a engineering reg meet tise, current ter issues on roweina wa h rd. by p icresses storm e neighoe- i sw Locust iLilliments an 1 he P an agi i d tor years iin tn system raise sewer 4 mu 5000i been cietring storm to the eA jigs proy nerty itiave con i neetion I me i ease ments t that via mproVe StreeL ture I nt through Infrastruc Street/ Cora. Commons 0:itreeliv vivhich ....., .„ . ... I . ,..... ..`,..,....,.... -... . ...„.... .„...„..„.„.... .-....... I ... ....... ............_ .......• .-.... 3 ,' . ......, ....... . . .„... . . ...„.. .. ".,..... ... I #er......:...--:.4.......,.......v.„......... • , I ' ' • - • • -•'4-'4'77 4",..i.:*IVIIT'77.7. .... ' :i...77:4:1,1;1..1•!..!:.1..**.i...34s4.,:t...H.,1..4.,,•;..... •• e".• . ., ..:••..,..... • . i••••• i ....1 I . . Milli ., i , - I' ,' . • r ) I, .. ... • x .. ... •■,..Mit ' 14. ,.. 4 . .4(• ' ' '4e4;.- '•"'""ilr..''41'444. v...41-7..It ,,,...... mog.!4....... .. 1.4.......it.,...,,t • .. ,--, •... . Pt! .' • ........ .. ' ... ..... 1;,..„..:';::;:e.• 1 <, ,!*Itit4t;a :.. . - 1 i 't: •-... . -E. 4g. :4„e........E1:4,,i.......i:::4.. i....... . . ..... 4 . . ..... ... I .•#*.J.''*•,,...iiii•iii -. .. •la• .--.4... .. • • "....---;,t-tr......,: 44.- r.. .r....1.-;4,4 ... .. .-4016,41k,",.....•1... •,...• ..44,;,-...::.i . . . •• • ......:,..•....5:,........!,,,e;c• .....4-1,,... .......ir.#.. .. :..„. . . ..,..., ..-...7e,}-i.....-...........'..-......1 t...-).f.,: ',....,, •I•••,.....4-;—.— .... wirvi.-.. .. • . . 4..z,m.1.r..,-.#.0 1.1,-.4••••,..;t4:4A+4,'1'"`'.4-*<.e.N.." .7'.... ' ..:*:40%, .4;'... .t...N.. -1. 1... :I ,.. 1,--... •,...n......,-,.-1 -, • • • ••••- • • , v.; 1— —**::...:.: '..,4160. ...- . ...'-.*. . - K-,..,..,-k... i4.*::'. ...1. ;1.4.1'..1v.,...: ..:1........• .„ .... i - . . ....„. .... ,..,...?........:,.f.=.4.Ar, ...-1A... -0-. ,:nek,hiel......A rt47;.;....;t1..........A....J. _ . . n ' >.''.. ''......'' t r-, t..i'",,,}.:-..,7„:., I.' [....-.:-.!'...."-......f.i•1......i.t...","!.... >. L....., . • • 1......;....1(......:......,......Z....\%(...:: L.1...........,..,t..........-).........-, k....,.....••• ,, •--• , - -... .............1....,...::: ••-------___.........__...._.__.,....._........_.___................_____._..,..,.................... . - 4 ....0 ''''....,,,..„.......s...I.,, ;,......,..i.„3,..„.i.....,...„.,..:....„;:.ci,.....,..... . ) 1. ......,. . .. .. I - • . — :::;....i.;,?:•••••„:...:.....„...,..... ..f.p.::::,•........:-.. .. • , i /....:' 31:: :. .:-:—.11,-*--- .it 4' * . :10f.:44'"4:in.1*:'41gr.. Al i tr•I'....:V....•.1....4' ''.. .. ., i .. '.......,...,7...L.1:.. • a 4. Ift ..0...ie,.4,,i4;,11..:1*.'' ,..r..:. .,... ..41' r . s I ':•,.:.,■:.:,,..:'..$.6::T.,..•.4„'.. , , .."7 4, 1..........i..4- 4.'...r .... 1. . . ' 4...-'...'...',..-4:- "".. ,..., v.to. ...\. „.„... ;.:‘.-: )..`..:. ,,t : 0.....„,..... : ..•,--AlksIll 4,-,,,,, ,.......f.,, .. ,, ., '''''''• . ' r 1,i,t?,....it:At„-...,--k*,,,,, ..,..40#..... , _..,...,.:„..,..........,;„...z.,•,...!..,y...:,...., _.... . .;,. .1.:...,......i,.1 , *.- .4, . 1 .14!..*1....:„...:,„„--1.- ...... :-.- , .00kt.'.17.....-- - , • . ......,„•,,if ...„,, . : 2:.:,..._. . •.., •,..at,* vir.::::...,..,•;... ..•• „,....,,...!!!,-. ..... nimons Ns-....- \\,..\ 't'- ,t,---:„...„.” .....:....M..„....0.3...„,,,....4...,....,.., . ..1.....,,..;:0:7,.....t......, z. arerg --ties s--° 0 1 tura ... :. ,. ..... , . , , . _,... ..... . cora " .fies men ! Tat: ts gt'is' -aclia -I rEgadeg a inter nave°. SI .te A an stst — ittroties al-agate g ains _I-10 0 ptit00 d T. ....... . ... . ... l';••: 1 . •., . ... ., ••:. . T 1 .,'::::, . . . ...... 1 •....••... • . 0 , . •. . . . .. • , . ... . .. •.... . . • . . . . . ••.... . .. • . •. . • . . . . . . . . • . ..... . ... . . • . . . . .. •.. . . • •. ........ • ••.. •• . •••• ••••. -I.-..:-....... •. • • ...4 ....-.4. ... nif.• :: • i. . ...v.:::••••... . .T.... . ...• •••1 .• %•• ,...... ••.., . ..... ... :f : 1.. ‘ ... . . . . . I . . .. . .. . . n • .. ...,....., ..' . .. , .. ..! . .. .. 0 . 'itir.„-a. • • :1...4... .mtiAbgm ;at . ...i. ... .. . ,.T.-,- ..,-, --..,(...,•-, : - ,--,.-... ....:. ,;:::1 .. i 1.11'.1"‘ 1.' ! 111.4111107Ii: •• ....'!''...1''."4' 71'ht...'::::. r\lit'.. e.tIllgfk..2)". ir'R 4 ' Li' '" ' '<'..44 '..) C € ' ' ' ' ''. ' '. 1 T4 ...'..T.. • -T14.0011 — : • -' : :: . .. . • i 14, . PISW:, ., ......g.....4 i 1.-N ca Liae o- aleetinaa ano c.../(.......irlitiat... ; .,.. 4 .;.41;.......... ......., • , .......; .... . . . . ••• ;• :.teit...... ...: ••.: : : .: . :• .. . •. 4 • . , .4 /: (.....'1'41.'iitY i..-,rogr'ar-rir..z.. st.....icia ;•::::::::.3-:::: :::„....a-111(--....-s .• . . _ --- :•••• y - }...-----::-/•-••,,a_i+'onal -••=aaents an," lac.-imet••: ••••aa-11'7.:4.r.:4:.'".' > 1........C.',.....,I. tc C E.! two/.4: • 4 , 4. 4„.A , , : •• ,......... 4-1 r — .,..........:Li.I ,...-.--A;I ......... ij i I <.... ....4..,... . I • AmE) 11 :1. : es -.. .i. .....,. ... .F. ,:1 ' • ' 1! • .. . . . . :•:•APIA?:3:ind.g. ":.:- '•-:.' , . .. It :4 • • * ', ITO.Piiiii':144 • . . . ..6.0!:71:7 igli. • - ""' .:u.•...! ...:...:::'::.:::' •••:Ei!..1: . - z.11::'Tiqiii.. • . .-*,--.:.. 1:t:':. , -I, . .......s. .: .. • .4,•:::•:s: ::::...„:„.::: • . _. ,::. 1"...: : .•:: :: - : 0:44 .• , . ..:.... ....:::Egon ni,gliii.* •.:::::•'4"iii,:;,:i4:1;::114, •. d:iti:i!,ovi: .i......Ft!iNi.a....:,.::..: . :::::::: • ' • :.1d. '.2.:54101:1:::..:. .. "•'".F.P:: MO'. , 9ta.:',..:::-:........ -•:"di.1 , . :,:. i.. tie 1-16,,,, ,;.1401 , -. ' 'd.'Iii ,r4,1,A42$1.17': ! • "...id:...:2d.46:::::. . .ffilirlaii ' ','•'''Z'. :•:g%d :. IL' ' . ..ii . .. sr ./MailleklotA.. "'P.a24,:;.• I.i,i.:17:::gt. ....:!.'7,.., 1 -i :•::...'....q.:'.4k::+4 '''.:.::::. : •r!.....:••.%-7-:::: ....,,........“...,..:.0• Nit. .. - .'.kigl....:. ,. t,...-.- :.....:1P',..,...1. :...:...:.......s.• .,... .--, Ni • _ . 'Niiiiip7.;Vi, .7•:::.:::.':-." .:4::.... . ',..::..",;.e. . • t.:::.:It., 0 - :::!:.:.71, ip .• !!•.i:-,;:-. .:..;:.,,.'. '. ', .t.-:,% I:. lerk:..• . 41. '..i.: iiii ::::::.::.'7,12:.....::;-•'-'.:,...1,'; ..:•::::-.:.:;.. .t. ..... 1 . ...... _ ., •.:: .,.,....:41.....:7-- .. —......eg...:: ... 4 „,.... • • • •• ‘. \ / • ,, ..,. \ \ 4/ •,-, \ ,... .4/ ..„ \ \ ... / .../ .„. ...... . . . . . . .. . .., • . \ 1 ,..•• „ .4\• \ 1 ../. \ 4 1 ,•'.'" tri a a a a T . rt r - • - ,, n :ir a 1 b- 1... .. . .. so • • s• r t ., ..... viSits , ..t . " r . . , „.... . . .. :(3 - —Irt.struth-c' b:: c1P.r°P rut: btr Costal Commons _ _ N1/4., 3hborhooc I. 1 it 11 % Pit 1 ,.* -7- ' ., • • • ••• • • • •••• • . . . . • •• . . . .• .• • . . . . ... . •••• •••• •• • • ... . . ... . . .. . . • • • • • • • '::•'''•''***•* * •• * • . . . .. . . .. . . . . . ••• • • •: •••• • ••••••••*••••••••••***':**••.'::::••••••••:*:•••••••••:::•':•::::::..........:*..........................•••.:....:',......:•.••••-•••••....*.................7..........:. ... • ... ........ ..•. . • .... .. . ...... ... .. . .. . . . . . ,. , • ' ' •..•.. • ... . • • .... . . . . . . . . . • :--. . : . • .. • •• • • .••• . • . . . .. . . * .. . . • • . . .••• . . .. .• . • • • . . . .....-. . .. , . . . . ...... . , . . . I...•■••••• . . • . .••• • -."''''''..."-- • • .......................... . ,. . .. .. : •. . . . ._.-.--... . • .._......._---.. . , .. .. . • • - • • • • • ••• •• . ................................................ .. . . . .... - - --- .... .. .• ...F---.illi-iell-1::,.....--zr .•---1.-----7 f..!I 1....1111.1 E=.4----••''......=: .........f. .• - • • - a Ill -------"111:1111.=-': . • •• •• • • . .. * . ---............ i - - -^ - -.......,....;......... . . • • •• - - ••• - • •,[ /....::::::•••••••• ••fil •- - • — * - . . . • .. • • .. , •• • •• • -.....4*--;-'444:-.. ..•'. '"`"".-1,-/. ..........:•••••••••....:. iposing ;sae P.,.`4111111NI. 1.'4 1 MERSIN' ••• . 2..... i ' •oho:v.. .. jai:..irei.1 ''...41,..•1111 - •I 11 ---.: : i iM . 171...: • 1....'.r:;....ii...:':••,•:'•iii If • . •• - • .. • • : • • rt.-- , ft:::I..... •-:: , . .-.ar :III ,60, ...........",407....:. ..i ot............ A ' .44.: ..- [1 .;•,,,:.AV:14::;•:.e.: •- 1.••• .-.•0?I •viiiii —— . . . • - .-...aproh.:.. . 6,,z- •- • ., ,.',I, ...III': , .. •••• •••• • • . .... . .......•• • •.....,..„. 1 f • ••.• •• • •• • • • ••• • • • • I • ... • ......Z::-...•._••• ••••::„...,\•7.....-....-,ma-•--.......I....I . • :•\.. !Ilk* ..l.f,''• . 1 . . • • \ : : : .i ••• I .• . • I. • ....D . \ , w . • .. .... .. . . . .,.. . • . .. • • • . .. . . . . • . . q. .. . i -.. '• ... ..... . .. .... i •• •••-‘g. liil 11 • •• ••• . . • .. ...: . • • • : •••.I.'''. I::.::: •.•••::: • - i ,. — :••••••.:.: ■•:r.:....•:•::::::: . 4 • i • • • : in L "t..' ...':.:•.::..-.... ::::.:- i• :::1:::.:.. ::::.0...:.. ..:: ..:.:::.: :4. _ :.;:::::::::.::::::::.z.:....:.:;.::.:::::::::.:::• I Vt .. : •• • i • . • ..... .. ........ . ..... . 4 . • •••••••••......•■... • :......• . 4 •• • .. .E..;.. r. :::::4A: •,...,::::..:..... ..•. ::.!.::::::::'....•::. 41:::•::::::•::3••:lir::.•:•.::.:.•.::::' 1 "• "• — •':••••••• .••• ' • .ii,Iii:•::. I.. . lik:::::::!::::•.!1 "::. l', ••.-....i II: . : , . • ..„........ • f . - . , . . . . . • alik::-.: •., :I• . . •••. .. • .. .. . , -:: 4:: i-: III N I t.I i',1'•I; '•.! • ... ... . ... .. • • .1: II •• '•.• N • ',.. :. :: • • • • ,:e II B:. .. II • I .• ... :: ::. g g .. . .• r • • A g.gg r.......•... ... , i '.4 ••: ...% g g I' .. I. ' .. . . .; ig Sg ,,.... '"••••••. i . • • • g ::: !g. 1:•! g I g 1 g g 4 'I- 4 ,•'• • • i --• ••••••••••••••••: ::::P " ** :.:4::::::'::: ... ...... '• •.::!0'::!?i':i"..?.!:;::i':;.....:.j.::::.•.•w•.•::..::::.:1.1:!. IY.14'•••••iiiiiKka.,i.:::•;:',.., ••••'•-•••••••'.•••••'•:•:ki:::.:::: :::.::!:::;:: i!**::::•::.:......:::.:::.:::::%:•aft:.:':::;:i:.:Z. . •••••••.•••••:!'''•,.'''"•.°••r...::.!''......:''',1.....r.,••••'•••• 011111:1;15::H•r.11•.:•.••:.• .::'.I.........•.12i::. '•••i...,■14J•••:'•'?%•'•:••••••:'••1•/•;1•••••••••!•.•:.•::::.;••,•?:••••4'. :.+T!..:.:::..■....W:....:.!.: ''.-::..::.:••::' • ..,11;*'' • •'•r ''.111:%.•••••-.::ir.•::::•-::....:::%:::::::..:!:1:::::::.:.:*'::%%::''''''"". ;If kf....:::::::..-:i.fr-* ''''-'5.:4'.'71•—•''—* r''.:..I.'--•* • • • t14•:::.:1•!.......L.i.:;.; !:i''';....::.••••::::••,•• k :. -•:•.:::.:4::::!'. 11e kg.•:-. kr4/1..::::If • 4, •• ••••-•••• wiEl • . .......„ . • . Coral . . Dwelling — —-—- - .— am:....:.....:::.....17.....,i...........,. .: .... ............ .....'.:._:......_..7=,..__._:__... . , iiiih•. .. . . • • • III !!! !!!ii 1 si on m I. . . •_• ...• .,_. •... . _....... ....::::::: ......... ._. ,_. _,..:( .,.:i. ..„,...,.... ..........._....._, ::::::::::: . — ill{.illl ....."'"'''.... .. .jag 1:11?I■g.. , -- — ......_ . ... .........,.• ...—. .......... ri....,=.4. -•; .. ,.i.•• iiiii.:=--; irai .;;; ,...,. imi lin.= = Iii _.;al.....— mi = , , •-• 6....---•— -- ..!....... —•ma imams .... ••••••••10.!=i...IP.=.••••• ......... . *. .111.."".".' 1111 7..... • et v..- .. In •111. ...II• —•1' Ill In-' - . ' •••• n . „ ...... .,..... - . :.'s Illii.. . - Adis • •': ' 40344111: • ,1111k..... ... ..-• .•••••••••••••-••••••••••••• . . ... . .. , .e.111T1hr'.. •:,.. •• ,:. . •.. . .... .... I , • ;'..,::.,''•::::....4...:..i.i... .!!!!".......-. • -' 'IP, It.- I "ii• -'.........•.-:H...,,.. - ., .. • .• • .-.'.-tt4,::..10116...'AA...4Z%;: • 6 ..,...44.1.•::X:06 ! '2'r k66.1..L'..'..6+;::.... .'::... ......:t '......'.....'' . A . 4 .61ndittardi'•.•:•C:4:i.•,...;.. . ...•ik:iiii444,....i..12.64WA41":::::.'7, ..4.;1,_:....—,....7.,....:,:......,,,-',.-.i........:..... ...: ... • .... .4 4 ' ...:. i......:..q.:..wpr.::..-.... . -0.1app...: .!.......!..,....,,,-,„r,:.*:4-.:;%;;;„,;..,'......... ••.„.. N„ •..........., • • . . i . 1,..„.. . .: .. ....,. ••_______ • ................ ... ,..... • .••• 4 A..f:::: .:•::.:..:'.....ii- . ... -•.......... ••- . - :, • 1 i! • •• • . . • • •• • _ • . ... ' 1 i • - •• - •" : ""' ":.;:1.17.•4., ....., .. . • • • ••••,, __ a,e: .. .• - 13..■ . .,...„, 7 . .. ---i• ,: :.., . •1• - l•-•,...-.1-.,......._......::". -41.7 ..' • ' ,_ .......... f . • . . I f 1 X i 1 .'• . A_. ••,..., .: _ ...... . •.. ...- - .,.....,_,... .........; n• • -....' 1 .' • .........., . . ,..,„A •,,.1 ■ ii •• • ..... .., • ) • ..;:. U. . ;':: '-""""?' ..:..-.4"''''''''-.--.77..::.:!:.7.-- --j:)901R'•- mr.:1'- "^:''''''`'m . . TT • Tr Tifirr. I : i T., ,•. • • .:: PE.'• . HillH! r .I.:J 4.:11rFAUM11% • . : i 1 i :4:.i$,. • f j . •' ',".• ii riniat'''':•!..'11A V•t%.4VV.P • •_1 W. •.- • ■ i •.•:•• •:. . • - -.• • . ''...\'-- • tq-.."i - . . ... .. ...- ..• . -••• .• • .. • : - • • 1m5-00i....:•:.7,... •• •• . • • . . •': .--•:: •• • ' -• .:.• - f • t::4"-; i. . '- ,.. • • • ..:.- n. ••'• • '-• . : •-."^.....-0.'!--•:• i.,7.1i .;... 4. '!..i.,:i:a. -• • . . : . •• • ."• ':::•;•7.;.r:..:„.:•.::...,.. :, : "!'''T • : ';,.(.. .• • . . ••• • • - .. ,::4'q•it.V...i,4.+:it?!..:'.4::ey. 44.r • .:r.114;3.' . •••• '. . - • - • . . • . • , • . • 4 : ''1 r:4;At•.',.:41:Zi 4.-7r,...,...!. ::•:,,•,,-..:.6:: ••::,,,...i.t...•.. _ - • . : - . .. - ........... ..,,..,.... . . .• • . •• .. • • - :* :. ii:::1.4,;e::'•'‘..::-I5i.:1..,,1:--i•r::::t4,13.44..!;,:::,J;.,• • ,...A: ::::::.•::,,...,t,•:::•...,:::.::.::::::••••,.. .... :, • .. - • •••::: Cli-L,', Commons Dvishilig Units • • • • • • .x: • • • • ;F .4:„.1,,,i ::,„.0 ......:....:.........:,.::..i!,...:.,..!t.:.,::.,,i,„,.,:...,..:..,...,.. ,.s uuma elan rn�•. 1 :.: • • .■ ti • • • .. • ti" r6zp'q<• ?x Y :::r:.,..........•:,.........*:.,„*;!. • :.:. 9F:5 e x+a.. Xf . q. • 4 L dam ?' : % • • • • fr( E�✓ /�� w • • • .�■ • • • • IyM1� h Ox i .. • •4 ' .. fit '•• • ... .. ».:. .............................. :................... ax::.::>qsy r+. 3 • • parew... ... :3i.x III1II » :..p • i • • I:i:e°.:....:.... :.:......:.. :.. • .: • • • DwelFng Uri 'lrii • • •••.. . . . , • � i ..: jai :.i i.Ii r.. t� ' ' ... . . '`' Iii11 11111 11! :.111�111111ihhl ' h11,. rri,,..,. -- :,111Th. :_ iii?i :�l a - = _ C: 3 :: ::•� i l+ ;II _�r - II 0 Ili _-_ : _ _.._._--..__.-7--___---._ .. . i.lit i IA '11,11;1111 ;111. 1 y =�- - =-- r r - r - ... ........ ,.Y • • [•• • • _. ' { i Y• • r .. _ ,i rl iii}:? • { • : : . z r ..::.. • • • . :e4 '2 'Fi � ' • ..a ... 66 :.:. .:.:.....:5x:iis�ii.x.>rb:y i..q......... .. ..... ........ .. a:is ............. .. .. ..is ...:. Dwell• • . . • r. . . . . . • •• • •.. . • •• . • • r.1 bupunatins LIM pozpowsieH .. . : •• ' ••• '•••'•'•:-:„-••`.••••.-"•.).:::::.:••-•••,•••;''',•-••-•••••:••;••.•••-•-•-•:::::-::::'•••.;^•••-•••:•••,••.:•:"--,••;:,••-••.;•11*-•.•:-..;-•.•ft';i:.:-•;;•-•:-..•:•/..*:•;.••:.:,•••T-•,,-:•••-••..••••":.....••L•••••....••„,•,....***„.:•,......::::.••••••:;••••;•,*\''..1..,..*:‘,....1*.>.,,,::::„.•..............:,.*•......,•.........•zii,••••••••,........,1......,••........1:.....••••••.."...........,,,.,...............,.......1....„........4........,.........z..........,.......4..........z.........,.....................1....„...,,...................,........„..„:„...........,................,.....„:...,........;....i.............,,................,...............................„...............:1.1.......1.1.....................................................................................::::..::.::.::::..::::::.:::::.::.::::............„........................................................................:...........::::.:........................... . ......... . . • ••••• •- •••••-•'•••••'•••'-"•-•-''''''•••-"••-,---;-•••^,-;••..,.:41`%ii...,'-..1,1'-1•,,'":••-••..D...-••'•';'•.':::>:::C:>:-•:-Y.4;qi*,"..,••:•,•*•*•4•••;-;•i•••••,.,',.:4*.••.•.';':•••••:•••.•:•••;:•••••:•••••,•(•.••;••.•'..:**. ••••;••:••••••••••44.Z.,••••"•:•••..••••;•':.**•.•••••••••...••••••:.•,••••••:-.*:•••••••••••••••..:**,..............'•.•;••..•:.'',.......',.............................:.............;..............................................:.........:.......................................-..........•.....::::::.:..:.........:..................:......:...:...................... . .... . •• ••• ••••'••••'..•4•••*********.•***'•*.•***•5*******••••***"••••••••';••'•C:4".***•'••••-•:•'''.1."••••''•••••••••':'..4:4.•."•••••••'''.".'•''•••••••"'''....Zi•'''....Z••••:"'.;'••••••••"•••:::••••••••••••••••••••••'-""•••"••••"••:*•;••••••••:'••••••••••••••••••••••••":".•••••••%.........•'•••••.•:•••••:?;•;•••••••...........X.....••••••••■•••.............2:'•:....................-......,•:•••>....................................-..................................................:..........i......!.::.................!....:;............:.:......:.......................:............................ . .. . .. . . . .. ..... . ....:•..• .• :• ...•. :'...::::•.........■•,.......,•;•,...;;;;',;?.......'..'"!'..'••.'•;;;••.'"*.;.,i•...:,i1:•:".....1.n.....'?•:;;;..ii.-;;.?.;',..V.,..t.,:•:•',..1"* ......,••..'....;...,....:...:••..`1•.:.•:::•:',...1....-•••;.2...1.....•■•••••.........:".......2....i.....:4........:..:••..................‘...,•:;,.....,:•. ...............;•••••••••••••••••:••••••••••■••••■••■■••••••■■••••••••■••••••••S'••••••••••'•••.:........••••.+:•,...................,............................,.........,••••••••••••••••••••••••••••■•,•••.••"•."•••••••........'.....7.••. ••••.'..•'.• .....:. • • • •• • *****•*********••••••••i ****••••***. •••••••••:• • • '•:•••••*••••i•••••••*•••••••••••••••••4•4!*".•••••*•••• •'::*:***** *:***•"'"-•'•'•••':::;'•;2**•••*:;::::•••:•:24;::?•";:•":'•••:•••••:;:•-'"'•••:•;•'•;••••••••••i;•;••••••••••••;••:iii'Z'1"•••••;•"•••4•:''•i•••••••••Z"•••••••••;`;•• ••••••'"•-•'•••:••••••":•'•••••••""••••••••••••'"••••••:•••••••••;•••".•1••••••••••••••:•••'"•••••••••••>••■••■:••••••;•••1■••;•".1".....::•;.•.:::.....:■■••Z••:•••••,.••••;••.iii:•••••••:•..........:,•••••••;.•••••••••?:••■•••f;.:::•,.......••••••••••.•:,•.••.•:•:•••••••••••••:••••,.........?"..4.,•••:...........•.......•:•••••••••••••••■•■•••••:....................................,.••..................,....■.:...:...:.........: .. -.. ..... .. . . . :• ..** •***•••• ••••••• **********••••••••••....•**: **"'"*";*•IC''..***•*:'••••:;••••"*Ii;**:'*:•**J.:••••• •":•"•••"■••••4;'!•:*•••••:•••:::*•••••:•;•'•*';'.i*"...*****;*".•;•••:":".::*••••":;•1:*'•;:"•'*":."'•i•:"• •••;•.*"•: •••::?'••"••••••••'••••••••:*i"'"••••"••••••S•Z2i!:.••1•:.4"....."."1:'•••••••"if:;"2"'•••••"(••••":"••••••••""•••;“•••■•■■••4••■•'•••■'•■•■••••••■••■■•••••••;4•"•••••••••••••■••••••:Z•••••••'`•••••••••••`••••••••••••••'•••••••"•••••••••■••••'••••••••••••••••S••••.•:::••••••:".••••.••••";•••••••;"..:'••• •••••:••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••:•••:••••••••••••••••.••••.......•••••••••••••••••:•.4.•:••••••••••••.••••.....................".•••........••••••:•••:,••••:::•:••:::::•••.........••••,.......••••••;•.•••••••••"..:••••••• ....... •.... • .. •••....• • .• ..... •••..• .•`...........'''';••••••••••••,.•■•'..••:•.'i■•••'• ••..."•,""'"•:.••-•••:,•••i'"'"•":4•"•.;',•'•';'•;••;•••••:.....,%••••••••••■•■•••••:•;:.::•••,";'"•••":;••;:'":•'';;;1'.."i;":::"••3•••■,....;%;:••■-•■•■4:•••'.•%•kiiii."•i:"•""•••:.i.'"'"(•*•*i'i.:12•;"".•>•:•:••";,•••••;••■•••••••••••I'••••••a•••.•■••••••'••••■-..i.........;.:•:•••:.•:,• ••••••,...........•■•••••••::•,;.:;•••...;:1•2••::::::::...,:•,•.......:•:•.■••••.••.•;•........'...•••./.....•'':.a..............i.i.•••••••••••■••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••■••••••••......................••••....s....................4......•••■•••••••.........*:••••••••••• ........-...;•.•• • ••••••••:''••••••• •• •• '• •• •• ••••••'''•'•'••'••'•-'•“•'.'.•'•'.'•••-•'•'•-•'•''-- 1-'''''.••':•'''"'''''''''•*"....:'••:•"•••"••'`'•'•1.'•"""*.-;1,.1%,,,,,,,,,,,,...-..';','Z'',..`"--..-....n.',..... 1h.r.r:.,,:.Z.......,%■•,',..,.....Z.*••■......•:.:,.....„:'''..."...,,...•.,:.:....•.‘.■: ,...,.,...-..,....,,,..............,.......:,,,...........,.....,.....,......,......,......,............................. .... . ... .. , . • •• *. .. ... . ... . . • •• ••• :::::-••- •, •.-.....-,-........< . ...,,.„,...44.,...., . ,• .. ..•...••:.••:::•:.::-.....:..-.'.---..•..-.;.:.•.--.:•,-.•:.....-*.....•. ,•..•••...!--...'.•....-..-......:-."•...".•.•...•.":•"•-•. *."'-•-••:•••-•:.*-:••••••f•.:"':."*:.i•.f.••-•.1•."...•....„..-•„•,.4.-•„1.•.'.•.••'••••.••.■••.„•:i'•,..•.......'••.:•.•*•*'••.•••,••••••-;•.••-•-•••.•....•-•••.•••,.•••.••„..•...••.4.••.**,.*•.„..-•.•..-...-•.•,...••„.•..•• `•.•.•„.....:••Code..:..•:_:.•.._...•„•_,•••-_„:•: N.::.•:.--.-:•::••:-. :••,:..••:.:,.•_•::-,._...._u. i:: r..:••••.e::.::::::•:.::•••_m•••,.....„-•-•:e •„..„.„•t.-::::•••s-r-f•-•.-.:••-:.-••••:.:.:.:„:..:,:-...:„........,...,.:.:.:...:-..:•..:.:..:..,.......................:.......:.•....•....................::..::•::::::.:.:::.::.:.:::......:•.:.•..:.:•.,...•...„.....:....•:..:.,......•..... ..... . •.................. .... . -_•-_•-•_:•..,:::::::::::::•::::-:.•••••••.•••••:::::•:••••.:..,.::„.........„:•:•.:::::•:::.„......:.:•.:...:.:•:....::::.::::::.:.........::.:.:............:::.:::..:....„....„...:„........:.....:......._... . . .. .. • ......... • •.• ...•....••....... . •.: -- .........••••••••••••••.••..•...•...• • • • •••••••••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.i.••••••••••••••••••••••••:•:-.---•••••••••••••,-----•-•,------•--•-•-••:•:.-..----•..-.:::::...::,.--....„.:.•••••••••::::::„....-..-,•:,•:„.::•,..::::::::::::...:.......•:::::•.:::.,•:::::::•::::.:::..............,.,.........,....,.... „ . ...._...._...._...__•_••• ••:-..:_•_:.•.•.•. . ..... . •......:••••• •.. ..:• ... • , •• : .: •••::•-•,.:-„...„..:::•._:•.•:_:_:„.::•.:.:..::::_._,_:„..„.„..:.::::,:::•;„:_:_•::_•.„•::::•::::„:„.:•:_••:_.•;„:„.....:,.:::;.•_:::.::::•:..:.•: ••...:. . . . .. . .. ... • . .. . .... . .. . . .. . . • • • • . ""•" .•......... ".......••....... .. •... . .. ... . ••• .....•.•••••••••••••••• ••• • • """."".........................":.::::.::::•:...::• . . •••••• •• • ... ... . .... . •• ., •• • ri• - ••Car r - •1 a r • ---- • ill : :::: ): ,0 cable r . . .- ... ,,,, , ...,......... ,..,..,.•,.....,, , • ....• • •- ; o,.• :. :u r: • • - :H",-:•-•:!:ff.....:•:•:- :::• : • 1 - •• •• .- •• •- ••••• •• -••••••••• 41 - _ -: 'N lir- - '.:'.--1,.....,;-‘,.'•vv•..7.,■•:..::.•zi.: : --.:- • • .- • • •• -• ••••••••........-.•••••...•...••••••••••:,••••••.•••.••••••.:::..•••••••:••••.:.••••••.•.,.....•• ...:-.....-.:::•,.-:.:--....-4:-.,.....,.,..-......:1.-.:•:::-..........-...„:-...,..,..-.„:„...„...:.......,...„..........,.....,...„...:„ 0- ••• j•••••••••••• : ---•••••• • • ••••••• • •••••• •••••••••••••••••••••-•••••••••;••••••••;•••••'••••••-:•-•-• ••• •••".,;-•••-•••.::5:•-•51-i•-.:14.f.•••.•::-.4?- 4:-.',:•.......,........:::-....-......-.2......;....-...-.:;:- ...-.;.;.f.......„.„... «. . .. .. . .-.;`....k....1,t .i.-i••--44'.;.•• .;.::•-•:•••1•••-••• • -•:4‘-: .-:.--...,,,, , ..a.r.. : •. .: -.::.-....,.......rr...::::::::•.....•r.r.rr..-:•,:r...•..•.......-....., •_.......,:r......rr..........„....„„:,:„:„„..,........:.:,„:„.......„.„...„......„:„:„...:„.„.......„„ .; .._....r... , _ . . • . • ..•.. •• •• • • _L...., 4. ".. -• ...*°!--.::•-•.1-......4...".7<.....:•:::••••::.....-...:......::::::•.......::..••••:......:•.•:•......:...•„........::--..............-.....::::,....-,:,,,,z....,,::::...<7_,...:::„...::"..:ii.4.•,.....4...,--•-•;,-....:„.•;.:,:,•:•;•:::.._:-.3.:4;...:,......:,, 4 _ , i...c; .,,,r... I . . .itir_.........,...,:-...,-, .4..........,.:...._•. •• • • . . . . . • --- -.------ ---------------.H.......-:.:..-...:.....-.....:::::.:::::,--,-,-:-..........-::-...-:.-.:-...-.::::.:;: :•• .• ......•-•.• •• :•••••.......-.....-..,,,,,--.--,:::::-..,...-,-„,.....,:,......,,,,.. •,. . .-,..,A,s,., • • . . • • •• ••••• • •••••_••••••• •• ••• •-•••-••-•.•••••• ••• .•....-.....-........•••••..••.•• ....--...,•••-,....,..--;,•-;•.-•••.......-5•,-.,,i,,,:-..f...;.--:••:.:,.....F.:?.---...-.--4,.....:-.-„-•..-.-:•:-•:,-;.:•;-..........„-..-:......--.,,,-;-.,-.;....:-..,:?......5.-..;•,,,:„......, ,..,,r....;. 3,i If:..1 '. ..,,.., :.•.•••m,;4.,.*.1 A 4*.V„..,.■ -- . .. • • .. ; -• '-::.......'.....::.:: •-. ...... - .......-....••••'''.. ......:.....•".• .:....:-.:.:...-...:'.•:'..'..:.::''.':•••'•....:'. ''''-:...' •...'••''...:•'... ''••••• •':...":'-'• -,.,r,!:-.....:;>N4,./::: . • - ••:— : .••-..,-.;p•;:o---:.-.i. ..-I -.-. . . . • ,, • 4? • • .......•••••••--.-•-•..... • - u. ... „. . . • .. •:-flid."4, .„ . •• . ..- C - : .% ' .: . . .... %. i'-'- ..:-.-.-:-::.:::-•-.-.'.::".-:.--;:....*::."-.-.:ii•:•1! ".•-..i.H".....:.:::::1"....-.j."....i....."*. ..' .*- . )7, •••• ... . . '. .zi•''''..*:. •••-.. . • •• -•• • - •. • p -•-, .4", • . : . •• .1 • .: • •-: : ,.. :•• . :•• :" 1• Hr:- :• • . • jc•di . ... .--- ::_,i ,i,„: • • • .. . ...•... • k' .....--% .. -'.....:. .... : . • . .. .•• •.• . . . . . - • • "..•.:• ••. :•.,.••••..,..............,...........z.::.:,.,. i.. gq. t n•v, .... '4a .• .. .-:.-4.:.....7. . : ......:.:•: • . .„ i • ••• ••••• ••.••• •••• • •• • •• : .: . •• .. •.••••„:-..........t...•.•:,:•........::::::::••••:•:••• : $ p..: ..-. :•• :: .....;-..1,....,. -..... ..:• ---- -- --- -- - ---- ‘ -!...- L„„„)r) 1 '....:.:6 I iLks -: - -- • • .. — *i. 1....,;; .. g • -...., • •...- ., -....• ---- --- - - --•--- •• • . .••.. .. . . .. .. , .... •.•• .. ... . --...- ••-- . ...• . . ...... .- - •.•..-.:.•-. •. • .. . .••. • • • • • •. ••.. ••— • • . 0114 '. - ' . ' . . . .. . ....... - ------ -----• ---- • ••••• a-.-.1:;74--.--.I = :mi. . ... ..... . :;.. .......... .. _.... _ • .• .• •••... • .• •. • • • . .. .. • ,...„...,...\.,........., ,.-44. • • • • —. .i • • •• . • • • • • -•--- • • •• • •. . • -•• •••. ..-.... • • •..... .•.... .- .... .. . i 1 . . .. ........ . .. .., .. ..... S .4.! - - : -*'' ' ' '!'I—tr .- . t—- r• .-••••-••••-•••• • • • , )ri. L : Lii • ,,......;; • : : „. .., ... • ,, . . .>. .. tif., -----••••• • •. . .. .. • . . • •. .• • • • . . • • • • • ..: •. . • • • • - -- -• -- • . .• .. •• - -• - _, ..... : :-i.- -- . •• •.. . ...•... L%-rea, ....., (.1 . buff€,J , .• iq . .. : ................„.... ..:-...i...................... ............ ..... . • • • • •.. •• . • . ... • . . . ... • --- -- - .... . ..... .. ... • . • . ••.. .•. •.. •.:.• . . ...• . . :••• . . . • . . • • • _ _ .. • .••. ......• • •• • . .... . . • ... . .. .. .. ... . . . . . .. .. . . .. • • • . . . . .. . . .. .,... . . ..• • . .. . • _ • • • . • . • . . . • • . • • • . .. g -, ,,lh i e., (-4, ;‘,...;.y ' V I ' '-- .i- iington Square regi: ----)na. r.' C.„.., .. , iti--- r .• idtegrd...._,,,i Wiiii . it.; NIP-1r (.1 0 r „......„ .- •,,,, • : ... ..,4,.. • .. .• .... • ,a; *•. )1.'t...!.... ,..... ..... • . ..'.. '' S.• :*•.V 1,- '•"-:•'..,: • ' • .. , _ • „. 1;* ; .,.;;;:, ,,.... . .... . A • 144' r.:*.1,_ ern] Ian , a lemr...1 n ......,..t....•...„ s :!..:-.1,„,:i7,..,.•••:r......•.:.„,. • .. [-In. .. ._ ; _.. .... . .. Ni. . .. -• - 1,'" . • , ro, -.., .P.,..4. .“ cs./..... -.. --4. .. ...A 7....-.• ,i•:..7.. ,:41:::::::-,-,... ' '4‘ ;_.L..:; -:. 1 1 ,•: • : c, , ,-.. . -4--• - • — ..,., ..1.4.4„ :1 .„.. ,,,_ ,,,.........:. ,.: ,-. .„ ..14,::::4. I P P J i.:.1-•,.-- ..: t. ;..,7-.-. 0°,..-. ,.!:.:,. i....„.q.:!i.a.. - 7`,,,..;.-.'•'::' • 4.• , •.;:!,.. . i,#:;:** r' ! ''. 1." -.1.1;;;v. ,;'•::ift 00004.1•11 OA 1 i,":;:•i;;; ..... * • • .1-..r)rox I: !Tr i t y tr.) P t...1 Lit-)i 1(...; . 0,v,i.•:,.t;,,.4-4..,,,N;I. woo--..........,„,-...........; •1.-., .-•,,...z-- :::;•-• , ..,---f4.•:-1,:••:;:i:::::;-ii:x .,. ..fa- 0 ...v• • ..._ - ....... • j:,mi•:: ,c...,,. .:...-• • • -" - r-r•-•.:-:**.4• ••.:!•,"•'..---- . . ....... , . ..,„ , • ......i.:,4 ...--. .0,Fr,:::.•••..gg • .... . ...-.... ffro •. ',V.v.-AO:4 • 0 ..,:;i7----... ,t•11,;'-f:... , :-./.......: •:.r.::,*. ., 1.......:.::.::::,!.:.-.....: ..::: ..: ..': o:- ...... • .,... . , .,.. . •.14,14:4:' ''. r 14. ( )1...)e)Orfl inno-s or .4 1..., !I 4...,..,4 f.... L.,>.,,, - . • '-4.....1.‘•••••-,ii;:' . *:::4"*.. -, **4"..4 • • .•-. . ., 14•• M .-::'; 7?... ,..; • * 'Li. • I:r. .r-s. - •• 100 4.is-• :,.• •..,.,....., .. 1,14 . • . ...'.+:••.!•..IN.lir -‘.4:411! II.I: •4 i i t ft;.„.... .4.,;:,i,.. :. . • ..... _ ‘ c... • ,,k,ab:•;-'114.,:,' ; i.,!;',',„y.,:i...:i o : 3--.;.;...,.„.s. „1 ., ,....., _. • L.1 I I 1 . t,,,::::(„j it 0 i Irt h,,c-\0 na 000 I.:L.:.,,•.-:.„strc- ::. 1 ., .. • •.,„. t.o.o.3--. -;,, Jo.: ,:.4FL,A;;;,..`f!'io,e' .4 ....' , ' •— * Lilliii=o -`''''. • ,•,•. ..;,1•: 4;'••'-'•••?..■4.:•4';* C.".. L.;,,o• : I..: • . ••.. . ; .- ,...:;•:::1;: '1;1 (...1 e V(.::::)i 0 P. M e n I * • :a.e 4 •',..:E'::•:.:.'i*••.* ,,•• -- •"'. •I*4-,, `.`4,... ..• - - -..: *oil- : I.Fi'VA. .■ r-.'4'..gsg,:::1...•.:1:1 1.:Agis...:fad"; —Cages!.-- 41.0::•*: • '' -::. 1,.."1-111:".". ' - -•..-•' .......::j i.:4, „.., ,:-.-. ..;;•':'"?' :P.: - .. s 72,..':› .....:7•,...—:Ai.t;14:;i:zi.V .....:**4.:4.4.1- ."6.44.... . ;.^. 7, .:',44;?....• ' ' •:• -,44,44'.. - 44„..." .. ,4.,,4. . %,......„4 .......,V v u i 4-,-,,,,,,,,u,4..u, -...,- •••- '4 • *•,-4i, 4,-. ,: . . • Thank You • Coral Commons A Great Community in Tigard • • Tt3.43 k :• '111111111--:..,-1., .et.4 .».•::•••••••••• .riA.1114!‘ .1;1g • 1.4,"..;.' • Procne:tat a Ciiirni)rehtt:::: Plan and Action Plan to dunk the Citys plattning actions Mit arid investments for next 20 yealS. C ill f)11::,47 S iV ti".! Plan Action Plan cohz.c.n-driveri hh..1(.:J>rmt tor the f.:..;orri;-.trehensive. Plan ifys rpext. '2(.) ye...ars hast.:...4.1 .1.1 S te pL) 1.)13.11111111,4 totain ltlethciia oleg y . po•-• ,• • to•-•••... inao . in.— pip.-.. • - • -.. „... , ;... . , .; • . ••.. ..••. .• 1“:" . ...• • • • Work Program Work Program Phase 1: Project Launch Phase 1:Project Launch 1.Get the Word Out Phase 2:State of the City,2006 -Provide basic foundation for citizens, Phase 3:What Are The Alternatives? changes from 1983-2006 Phase 4:Put it in Writing Phase 5:Adoption 2.Identify Issues and Values Phase 6:Action Plan -Tigard Beyond Tomorrow,all City surveys(last 5 years) -New Survey—March Products:Preliminary Overview, Survey Findings Work Program Work Program Phase 2:State of the City,2006 Phase 3:What Are The Alternatives? Goal:Provide a complete picture of current Goal:Community defines future direction conditions. 1.Inventory existing conditions 1.Develop/evaluate alternatives for each topic 2.Analyze data to verify issues 2.Conduct Virtual Tours in Library 3.Verify state and local requirements -Citizens provide feedback -Preferred alternatives selected Products: Findings per Topic,Maps Product:Preliminary Report Work Program Work Program Phase 4:Put it in Writing Phase 5:Adoption Goal:Convert values,analysis and alternatives Goal:Adopt Plan. into the Plan 1.Public Open Houses 1.Draft Comprehensive Plan Chapters 2.Planning Commission Hearings -Draft policies,identify implementation 3.City Council Hearings. measures. -Perform in phases. Product:Adopted Plan. Product:Draft Plan chapters 2 • • Work Program Public Involvement Program Phase 6:Action Plan 1.Citizens'Values Goal:Realize Comprehensive Plan Build on Tigard Beyond Tomorrow,all citizen 1.Include proposed actions as part of Comp survey results,and new survey Plan development(Phase 4) 2.Open Houses(Virtual Tours)at Town Hall or 2.Planning Commission Hearings Library. 3.City Council Hearings. 3.Publicity:Cityscape articles/website,articles 4.Reviewed on yearly basis. 4.Provide Board and Committee,Tigard Beyond Tomorrow updates Product:Adopted Plan. 5.Planning Commission Work Sessions Discussing with CCI Thursday,Feb.16 Timeline/What's Next Timeline Feb.16:Committee for Citizen Involvement for March June Sept °K March June Sept D Public Involvement component(Goal 1 requirement) Phase 1: Feb.21: Planning Commission/City Council Phase 2: Joint Work Session Phase 3: March:Survey;launch of Phase 1 Phase 4: Estimated completion date of Plan:end of 2007 Phase 5 and 6: 3 120 DAY, =5/18/2006(Include -day extension) • DATE OF FILING: 3/20/20 a s CITY OF TIGARD TIGARD , Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO. 2006-02 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Case Number: ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2005-00009 Case Name: UPPER BOONE S FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE Name of Owner: Richard Ackerman,James Wathey and LaRusso Concrete Co.,Inc. Name of Applicant: LDC Design Group Attn:Ed Murphy Address of Applicant: 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro,OR 97124 Address of Property: 15920 SW 74th Avenue and 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd.&adjoining properties Tax Map/Lot Nos.: Washington County Tax Assessor's Map No.2S113AB,Tax Lots 200/300/400/500 and 2S 112DC,Tax Lots 1100/1200/1300. A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A ZONE CHANGE. THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICAN'T'S PLANS, NARRATIVE, MATERIALS, COMMENTS OF REVIEWING AGENCIES, THE PLANNING DIVISION'S STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 6, 2006 TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY REGARDING THIS APPLICATION:" THIS DECISION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AN) CONCLUSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER Request: > The applicant is requesting approval for a Zone Change from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) for approximately six (6) acres located between SW 74th Avenue and Upper Boones Ferry Road. The subject property is currently developed with outdoor storage and older industrial buildings. The applicant envisions developing the property with an office use, which is not permitted in the Light Industrial zone. Current Zoning Designation: 1-L: Light Industrial District. Approved Zoning Designation: I-P: Industrial Park District. Applicable Review Criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.530; and Comprehensive Plan Policies 2,3,4,5,7,8,9 and 12. Action: > ❑ Approval as Requested © Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to: © Owners of Record Within the Required Distance © Affected Government Agencies © The Affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator © The Applicants and Owners The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obtained from the Planning Division/Community Development Department at the City of Tigard City Hall. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MARCH 21, 2006 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON APRIL 5, 2006 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON APRIL 4, 2006. Questions: If you have any questions,please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. • • NOTICE OF -FINAL ORDER NO. 2006-02 PC • BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION• T I GARD FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON A FINAL ORDER APPROVING A LAND.USE APPLICATION FOR A ZONE CHANGE. THE COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON THIS APPLICATION ON MARCH 6, 2006. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS BASED THEIR DECISION ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. (Includes a 77-day extension) 120 DAYS =5/18/2006 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NO.: Zone Change(ZON) ZON2005-00009 FILE NAME: UPPER BOONE S FERRY ROAD CHANGE PROPOSAL: The applicant requests a zone change from Tight Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) for approximately 6 acres located between SW 74th Avenue and Upper Boones Ferry Road. The subject is currently developed with outdoor storage and older industrial buildings. The applicant envisions developing the property with an office use,which is not permitted in the Light Industrial zone. APPLICANT: Ed Murphy OWNERS: Richard Ackerman,James Wathey LDC Design Group . . and LaRusso Concrete Co.,Inc. 20085 NW Tanasbourne Dr. do Ackerman Hillsboro, OR 97124 919 West Point Road Lake Oswego, OR 97034 LOCATION: 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and 15920 SW 74th Avenue and adjoining ro erties;WM4 2S 113AB, Tax Lots 200, 300,400,and 500;2S 112DC,Tax Lots 1100, 1200,and 1300. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service,manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants,personal services and fitness centers,in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the .I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. Among other uses,indoor entertainment is allowed. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.530; and Comprehensive Plan Policies 2,3,4,5,T,8,9 and 12. UPPERBOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE(ZON2005-00009) PAGE 1 OF 11 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2006-02 PC • • SECTION II. PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION The Planning Commission finds that the proposed Zone Change will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City and meets the Approval Standards as outlined in this Final Order. `Therefore the Commission APPROVES the Zone Change subject to the following Conditions Of Approval.and-Findings within this Final Order: SECTION III. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The applicant shall contribute to the City their "proportionate share" at time of final building inspection of the eastbound right turn lane at the 1-5 southbound ramp terminal/Upper Boones Ferry Rd intersection. Proportionate Share=s/(f-e) +s)"100 =45/((3380-2650) + 45)''100 = 5.81% See attached letter from ODOT for details of how the proportionate share was calculated. 2. The applicant shall contribute to the City their "proportionate share" at time of final building inspection of the improvement costs for providing a second southbound through lane and a southbound right-turn lane at the Durham Road/Upper Boones Ferry Road intersection. The City Engineer will determine the proportionate share. SECTION IV. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History In the late 1970's the subject 6-acre property was zoned M-3 Industrial. In 1983 the M-3 zone was replaced by the. I-P (Industrial Park) and I-L (Light industrial) zones with the subject property being designated I-L. The properties are currently used for office and industrial uses, particularly for land intensive outdoor storage of materials and equipment. There are a few older,single-story buildings on the site with some landscaping along Upper Boones Ferry Road. Vicinity Information The site is located within a large industrial/commercial area that borders I-5 and extends from Highway 217 to Bridgeport Road and beyond. The subject property is bordered on the north east,west and most of the south sides by I-P zoning. Approximately 140 feet feet the entire perimeter of the site is adjacent to properties zoned I-L (across Boones Ferry Road). Adjacent uses include a 3-story Class `A' office building,a lumber yard,single-level industrial/office buildings, and a railroad. Site Information and Proposal Description The applicant is requesting approval to change the existing zone from Tight Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I P) in order to build a class A'office building,which is an allowed use in the I-P zone and not allowed within the 1-L zone. The I-P zone still allows for light-industrial uses, however, it also allows for a wider range of uses,making the property more marketable and likely to increase opportunities for a positive economic impact. A pre-application conference held by the applicant for the proposed office use on the subject property indicated that a 3-story,approximately 127,000 square foot office building is anticipated for the subject site. SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.380 Section 18.380:030.A states that the Commission shall decide zone change applications which do not involve comprehensive plan map amendments. Section 18.380.030.B states that a recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application for a quasi-judicial amendment shall be based on all of the following standards: UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE(ZON2005-00009) PAGE 2 OF 11 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2006-02 PC • • Section 18.380.030.B.1 Demonstration of compliance with all applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designations. The Comprehensive Plan treats the I-L and I-P zoning districts, which together comprise the T.ight Industrial Comprehensive Plan Designation, interchangeably. The applicable Comprehensive Plan Polices are as follows: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES 1. GENERAL POLICIES 111a The city shall ensure that this comprehensive plan and all future legislative changes are consistent with the statewide planning goals adopted by the Land Conservation and Development Commission, the Regional Plan adopted by the Metropolitan Service District; Implementation Strategies 1. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land. Use Map and the Official Zoning District map will reflect the plan policies and apply land use categories in the following manner. j. Light Industrial - Refers to areas deemed appropriate for industrial activities which include manufacturing, processing, assembling, packaging or treatment of products from previously prepared materials and which are devoid of nuisance factors that would adversely affect other properties. The appropriate zoning districts are Light Industrial (I-L) and Industrial Park (I-P) which also permit offices and related uses. The proposed zone charge from I-L to I-P complies with the Comprehensive Map designation of "Light Industrial" because the I-P zone is one of the two industrial zoning districts that implement the Light Industrial Comprehensive Plan Designation. The proposed zone changed would-not amend the comprehensive plan and is not a legislative change. However, the land use categories are defined in this section and have been included for clarity. 2. CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT: 2.1.1 The City shall maintain an ongoing citizen involvement program and shall assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process. The applicant's representative sent out notices to surrounding property owners and neighborhood representatives, posted a sign on the property, and held a neighborhood meeting on September 7, 2005 in accordance with the City of Tigard s neighborhood meeting notification process. According to the minutes of the neighborhood meeting, four property owners were in attendance. Those in attendance discussed the proposed access to the site and the impacts that the proposed office use would have on the area. No objections were given to the proposed zone change. In addition,the City.has mailed notice of the Planning Commission hearing to property owners within 500 feet of the subject site, interested citizens, and agencies, and published notice of the hearing pursuant to TDC 18.390.050 for Type III Procedures. FINDING: With these public involvement provisions and the applicant's documented participation, the proposed zone change is consistent with applicable Citizen Involvement policies. 3. NATURAL FEATURES AND OPEN SPACE: 3.1.1 The City shall not allow development in areas having the following development limitations except where it can be shown that established and proven engineering techniques related to a specific site plan will make the area suitable for the proposed development. (Note: this policy does not apply to lands designated as significant wetlands on the floodplain and wetlands map.): UPPERBOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CElANGE(ZON2005-00009) PAGE 3 OF 11 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2006-02 PC • • a. Areas meeting the definition of wetlands under Chapter 1.26 of the community development code. b. Areas having a severe soil erosion potential; c. Areas subject to slumping, earth slides or movement; d. Areas having slopes in excess of 25%; or e. Areas having severe weak foundation soils. The subject site is flat and fully covered by buildings or graveled parking and work areas. The site is approximately 240 feet west of Fanno Creek at its closest point and separated from it by SW 74th Avenue, railroad tracks, and commercial development. According to the City's inventories, the subject property does not include wetlands or any of the development limitations listed above. However, should any of these development limitations be present on site, at the time of development the applicant would be required to demonstrate through a specific site plan that the area is suitable Tor the proposed development. FINDING: The proposed zone change is consistent with the applicable Natural Features and Open Space policies. 5. ECONOMY: 5.1 The City shall promote activities aimed at the diversification of the economic opportunities available to Tigard residents with particular emphasis placed on the growth of the local job market. According to the applicant's narrative, the proposed zone change will facilitate a wide range of more employee-intensive uses than the existing I-L zone, so the zone change will stimulate economic development and provide city residents with the opportunity to work near home. In addition, there are positive economic benefits from the proposed office uses, particularly to nearby restaurants and other retail businesses. 5.4 The City shall ensure that new commercial and industrial development shall not encroach into residential areas that have not been designated for commercial or industrial uses. The subject site is surrounded by lands zoned I-P and I-L. The nearest residentially zoned land is proximately 700 feet to the west and is separated from the subject site by a railroad, 74th Avenue, and Fanno Creek The proposed office use would not encroach into nearby residential areas. FINDING: The proposed zone change is consistent with the applicable Economic policies. 7. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES: 7.1.2 The City shall require as a pre-condition to development approval that; a. Development coincide with the availability of adequate service capacity including: 1. Public water; 2. Public sewer shall be required for new development within the city unless the property involved in over 300 feet from a sewer line and Washington County Health Department approval for a private disposal system is obtained; and 3. Storm drainage. b. The facilities are: 1. Capable of adequately serving all intervening properties and the proposed development; and 2. Designed to city standards. c. All new development utilities to be placed underground. According to the applicant's narrative, the properties are already connected to public water, sewer and storm facilities and that upon preliminary review, there are adequate. utilities to serve the site. The proposed office use of the site, subject to approval of this zone change request, will undergo site development review to ensure that public facilities and services are adequate, capable of serving intervening properties,and designed to city standards. UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE(ZON2005-00009) PAGE 4 OF 11 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2006-02 PC • • FINDING: The proposed zone change is consistent with the applicable Public Facilities and Services policies. 8. TRANSPORTATION: Transportation System 8.1.1 Plan, design and construct transportation facilities in a manner which enhances the livability of Tigard by: a. Proper location and design of transportation facilities. b. Encouraging pedestrian accessibility by providing safe, secure and desirable pedestrian routes. c. Addressing issues of excessive speeding and through traffic on local residential streets through a neighborhood traffic program. The program should address corrective measures for existing problems and assure that development incorporates traffic calming. 8.1.2 Provide a balanced transportation system, incorporating all modes of transportation (including motor vehicle, bicycle, pedestrian,transit and other modes) by a. The development of and implementation of public street standards that recognize the multi-purpose nature of the street right-of-way for utility, pedestrian, bicycle, transit, truck and auto use. b. Coordination with Tri-met, and/or any other transit providers serving Tigard, to improve transit service to Tigard. Fixed route transit will primarily use arterial and collector streets in Tigard. Development adjacent to transit routes will provide direct pedestrian accessibility. c. Construction of bicycle lanes on all arterials and collectors within Tigard consistent with the bicycle master. All schools, parks, public facilities and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a bikeway. d. Construction of sidewalks on all streets within Tigard. All schools, parks, public facilities and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a sidewalk. e. Development of bicycle and pedestrian plans which link to recreational trails. f. Design local streets to encourage a reduction in trip length by providing connectivity and limiting out-of-direction travel and provide connectivity to activity centers and destinations with a priority for bicycle and pedestrian connections. g. Tigard will participate in vehicle trip reduction strategies developed regionally targeted to achieve non-single occupant vehicle levels outlined in Table 1.3 of the Regional Transportation Plan. h. Tigard will support the development of a commuter rail system as part of the regional transit network. The Transportation Goal policies and implementation strategies are largely directed at the City and include objectives that create the framework for ensuring that the transportation system is adequate for all modes of travel at the time development occurs. These objectives are implemented by the Development Code standards that apply during development review. 8.1.4 Set and maintain transportation performance measures that: a. Set a minimum intersection level of service standard for the City of Tigard and requires all public facilities to be designed to meet this standard. b. Set parking ratios to provide adequate parking,while providing an incentive to limit the use of the single occupant vehicle. c. Encourage working with other transportation providers in Washington County, including Tri-Met,Metro and ODOT to develop, operate and maintain intelligent ent transportation systems, including coordination of traffic. g Marah Danielson, Oregon Department of Transportation Development Review Planner, commented on the subject zone change proposal in a letter to the City on February 23,2006: UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE(ZON2005-00009) PAGE 5 OF 11 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2006-02 PC • • We have reviewed the applicant's proposal to rezone six acres from light industrial (I-L) to industrial park(I-P). The site is in the vicinity of the Upper Boones Ferry Rd/I-5 interchange and the Upper Booties Ferry Rd/Durham Rd intersection. ODOT has jurisdiction of these State highway facilities and an interest in assuring that the proposed zone change is consistent with the identified function, capacity and performance standard of this facility According to the 1999 Oregon Highway Plan fOHP , I-5 is classified as an Interstate highway facility and Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Durham Rd is classified as a District highway facility. ODOT has jurisdiction over the SW and NW legs of the Upper Booties Ferry Rd/Durham Rd intersection. The performance standard for these facilities is 0.99 volume to capacity(v/c) ratio. For zone changes and comprehensive plan amendments local governments must make findings that the proposed amendment complies with the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) OAR 660-012- 0060. There must be substantial evidence in the record to either make the finding of "no significant effect" on the transportation system, or if there is a significant effect assurance that the allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity, and performance standard of the transportation facility as measured at the end of the planning period identified in the City's Transportation System Plan or for state highways apply the gghway mobility standard (volume-to- capacity ratio) identified in the Oregon Highway Plan over a planning horizon of the adopted local transportation system plan or 15 years from the proposed date of amendment adoption,whichever is greater(OHP Action 1F2). Oregon Highway Plan(OHP) Action 1F6 applies to situations where the highway facility is operating above the OHP mobility standard and transportation improvements are not planned within the planning horizon to bring performance to standard, the performance standard is to avoid further degradation. If the proposed zone change or comprehensive plan amendment increases the volume- to-capacity ratio further,it will significantly affect the facility. Findings for the I-5 southbound ramp terminus on Upper Boones Ferry Rd intersection ODOT Region 1 Traffic has reviewed the traffic impact study(TIS) prepared by Kittelson and Assoc January 18th, 2006 for impacts to the I-5 southbound ramp terminus on Upper Boones Ferry Rd. In the planning horizon year 2021 the v/c with the existing zoning at the intersection will be 1.09 and with the proposed zoning will be 1.10 both of which exceed the OHP maximum v/c of 0.99. As per OHP action 1F6, with this increase in the v/c ratio means that the proposed zone change will significantly effect the I-5 southbound ramp terminus/Upper Boones Ferry Rd intersection. To mitigate for the significant effect, Kittelson proposes to optimize the signal timing to bring the v/c back to the current zoning level. Optimizing the signal timing is not adequate mitigation because ODOT relies on signal timing to maintain optimal intersection function for vehicles ettin off the interstate and may adjust as necessary when conditions change. Based on ODOT's analysis, an eastbound right turn lane is warranted at the intersection and would improve the operation of the intersection. Because the proposed zone change only increases the v/c ratio slightly from 1.09 to 1.10, ODOT recommends that the City require the applicant to contribute their "proportionate share" towards the installation of an eastbound right turn lane. ODOT requests the City collect money towards this improvement on our behalf. Recommended Condition of Approval The applicant shall contribute to the City their"proportionate share" of the eastbound right turn lane at the I-5 southbound ramp terminal/Upper Boones_Ferry Rd intersection. Proportionate Share=s/(f-e) +s)*100 =45/((3380-2650) +45)*100 = 5.81% s = 2021 Total PM Peak Hour Intersection Trips w/ Proposed Zoning ('ITS figure 4) — 2021 Total PM Peak Hour Intersection Traffic w/ Current Zoning (TIS figure 3) =45 ff-e) =background traffic growth =2021 Total PM Peak Hour Intersection Trips w/ Current Zoning(TIS figure 3) =3380 e=2006 Total PM Peak Hour Intersection Trips w/ Current Zoning(figure 1) =2650 UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE(ZON2005-00009) PAGE 6 OF 11 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2006-02 PC • • Additional Comments The ODOT Rail Division has reviewed the TIS for impacts of the proposed zone change on the public rail crossing on Durham Rd. There is an existing queuing problem across the rail tracks. City staff has indicated that the City will be making a "reasonably likely" determination for funding of the identified widening of Durham Rd to 5 lanes in the City's TSP. The widening of the rail road crossing will require a Rail Order be obtained from the ODOT Rail Division. As part of the Rail Order, the safety of the crossing will need to be evaluated and upgraded as necessary to address crossing safety. ODOT appreciates the City's willingness to work together to collect funds to address the capacity constraints at the I-5 southbound ramp terminal intersection.We look forward to working with the City to develop a reasonable travel shed and.proportionate share formula for collecting money towards the eastbound right turn lane from future proposed developments under existing zoning to improve the capacity at the intersection. The City of Tigard Engineering Department concurs with ODOT's conclusion. Therefore, conditions will be imposed consistent with the transportation performance measures of Section 8.1.4, as identified below. 8.2 Trafficways 8.2.1 The city shall plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. 8.2.2 The city shall provide for efficient management of the transportation planning process within the city and the metropolitan area through cooperation with other federal, state, regional and local jurisdictions. • 8.2.3 The city shall require as a precondition to development approval that: A. Development abut a publicly dedicated street orhave adequate Access approved by the appropriate approval authority; B. Street right-of-way be dedicated where the street is substandard in width; C. . The developer commit to the construction of the streets, curbs And sidewalks to city standards within the development,• D. Individual developers participate in the improvement of existing streets, curbs and sidewalks to the extent of the development's impacts. E. Street improvements be made and street signs or signals f..e provided when the development is found to create or intensify a traffic hazard; F. Transit stops,bus turnout lanes and shelters be provided when the proposed use of a type which generates transit ridership; G. Parking spaces be set aside and marked for cars operated by disabled persons and that the spaces be located as close as possible to the entrance designed for disabled persons; and H. Land be dedicated to implement the bicycle/pedestrian corridor in accordance with the adopted plan. • The Transportation Goal olicies and implementation strategies are largely directed at the City and include objectives that create the framework for ensuring that the transportation system is adequate for all modes of travel at the time development occurs. These objectives are implemented by the Development Code standards that apply during development review. According. to the applicant's narrative, the proposed subsequent development anticipates reducing the number Of access points into the site from four to two and eliminates the driveway crossing of the railroad tracks. As a result access to and from the subject property would be made safer. The City may require additional dedication of land to meet current street right-of-way requirements on Upper Boones Ferry Road. However, the dedication of right-of-way will be addressed under Site Development Review. UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CRINGE(ZON2005-00009) PAGE 7 OF 11 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2006-02 PC • • The proposed office use is likely to generate increased transit ridership. Tri-Met bus routes 38, 76, and 96 serve the subject site with a bus stop located directly in front of the site on Upper Boones Ferry Road and SW 72nd Avenue. The applicant states they will work with Tri-Met to make any reasonable pedestrian or transit-oriented improvements that will encourage transit ridership. Any proposed development for the subject site will be required to meet the standards of Section 18.-810 of the-Tigard Development Code regarding transit facilities.during development review. The Site Plan will also be reviewed by Tri-Met as part of the Site Development Review application. All on-site parking and circulation for any proposed development will be done to City specifications as required by the Tigard Development Code. FINDING: As shown in the foregoing analysis, the City's Comprehensive Plan Transportation Polices have been met with the exception of the Transportation Performance Measures. City Engineering Staff concurs with ODOT's conclusion regarding the transportation performance measures. Therefore, with imposition of the following conditions, the transportation policies can be met. CONDITIONS: The applicant shall contribute to the City their "proportionate share" of the eastbound right turn lane at the I-5 southbound ramp terminal/Upper Boones Ferry Rd intersection; and The applicant shall contribute to the City their "proportionate share" of the improvement costs for providing a second southbound through lane and a southbound right-turn lane at the Durham Road/Upper Boones Ferry Road intersection. The City Engineer will determine the proportionate share. 9. ENERGY: 9.1.3 The City shall encourage land use development which emphasizes sound energy conservation, design and construction. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 3. The City shall locate higher densities and intensities of land use in proximity to existing and potential transit routes specifically with convenient access to federal and state highways, arterials and major collector streets. 8. The City shall coordinate with and support public and private planning efforts that advocate alternative forms of transportation such as mass transit, carpooling, ride share, bicycling and walking for commuter purposes. The site is located on Upper Boones Ferry Road (an arterial) which is within 1/ mile of I-5 and 1/2 mile of two I-5 interchanges. Two other arterials, SW 72nd Avenue and SW Durham Road intersect with-Upper Boones Ferry Road within 500 feet of the subject site. The proposed zone change would allow office use of the site which would be a more intense use in terms of vehicle trips per day than industrial uses currently allowed. According.to the applicant's narrative, future employees and visitors may walk, bicycle, car-pool, take a bus, or drive to the site. These modes will be addressed during development review of any subsequently proposed use of the site. FINDING: The proposed zone change will allow for an efficient use of the transportation system to • conserve energy,consistent with the applicable Energy policies. 12. LOCATIONAL CRITERIA: 12.3 INDUSTRIAL. The intent of the industrial land use designation is to: 1. Provide for the designation of suitable lands for industrial use; UPPERBOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE(ZON2005-00009) PAGE 8 OF 11 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2006-02 PC • • �. 2. Provide for economic growth and development; 3. Protect existing and potential lands suitable for industrial development from encroachment by non-industrial or incompatible uses; 4. Provide land for industrial use by type to minimize the impact on surrounding development; and 5. Take advantage of existing transportation facilities. Industrial lands are classified as: Heavy industrial lands are areas intended to provide for manufacturing, processing and assembling activities. Uses within this classification are characterized by large buildings and large storage areas and as having associated external effects such as smoke, noise, odor or visual pollution. Light industrial lands are areas intended to provide for manufacturing, rocessing assembling and related office activities. Uses within this classification are of a size and scale which makes them generally compatible with other non-industrial uses and which have no off-site effects. The land use map designates specific areas of the city for industrial development. Over time, however, there may be a demand for new sites. Therefore, the following policy will apply in making such decisions. 12.3.1 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE THAT: a. Sites heavy industrial development shall be: (1) Separated by topography established buffers transportation or other non- residential land uses from residentially developed areas. (2) Located in areas having rail service, arterial or major collector access. b. Sites for light industrial development shall be: (1) Buffered from residential areas to ensure that privacy and the residential character of the area are preserved. (2) Located on an arterial or collector street and that industrial traffic shall not be channeled through residential areas. c. The site shall be of a size and shape which will provide for the short and log range needs of the use. d. The land intended for development shall have an average site topography of less than 6% grade, or that it can be demonstrated that through engineering techniques all limitations to development and the provision of services can be mitigated. e. It can be demonstrated that associated lights, noise and other external effects will not interfere with the activities and uses on surrounding properties. f. All other applicable plan policies can be met. The site is buffered from residential areas and is located on an arterial street that provides connection to other arterials and collectors without going.through a residential neighborhood. The site is appropriate for the uses allowed in the I-P zone because it is level and at 6 acres is an adequate size and shape for the intended office use as proposed in the applicant's narrative. The uses allowed in the proposed I-P zone are less intense in terms of environmental impacts than those allowed in the I-L zone and the industrial uses in the I-P zone are prohibited from creating adverse off-site impacts such as noise, vibration, glare, outdoor lighting and odors. The subject site is almost completely surrounded by properties zoned I-P, so the proposed zone change will make the site more compatible with its surroundings, consistent with the Locational Criteria for lands zoned Light Industrial. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies outlined above have been adequately addressed. 18.380.030.B.2 Demonstration of compliance with all applicable standards of any provision of this code or other applicable implementing ordinance; and- UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE(ZON2005-00009) PAGE 9 OF 11 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2006-02 PC FINDING: The proposed zone change does not include a specific development proposal at this time. However, during Site Development Review, any new development will be required to meet all of the current Tigard Development Code standards of the I-P zone. 18.380.030.B.3 Evidence of change in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to the property which is the subject of the development application. Staff reviewed the zoning history of the industrial zoned lands south of SW Bonita Road, east of SW 74th Avenue, west of I-5 and north of Tualatin in the vicinity of the proposed zone change and found that since the conversion from M3 industrial zoning to I-L and I-P in 1983,there has been a steady conversion of I-L zoned lands to I-P zoned land. Of approximately 254 acres zoned I-L in this area in 1983, approximately 90 acres, or 35%,have been converted to I-P. The proposed zone change would convert an additional 2.4% of this area to I-P. In 1983 the subject site was bordered on two sides by I-P zoned properties. Adjacent lands to the north and southeast were subsequently converted to the I-P zone. Today the subject site is virtually surrounded by lands zone I-P. The applicant's narrative provides a broader perspective regarding evidence of change in the community including, the le islative conversion of industri l zoned lands to mixed use commercial G� an employment districts in the Washington Square sector of Tigard to the north, and Tualatin''ss conversion of industrial zoned lands to mixed use commercial in the Bridgeport Village area to the south. The applicant asserts that the proposed zone change and prospective office development reflects a maturation of the market for Class "A" office buildings in the Wilsonville/Kruse Wayl-5 corridor. FINDING: The foregoing analysis demonstrates that there has been a significant and steady change (conversion of lands zoned I-L to I-P) in the neighborhood and that the proposed zone change represents a.further incremental change consistent with this trend. There is no apparent evidence of a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map. SECTION VI. ADDITIONAL CITY STAFF AND OUTSIDE AGENCY COMMENTS City of Tigard Public Works Department have reviewed this proposal and offered no comments or objections City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and offered no comments or objections. City of Tigard Long Range Planning Department has reviewed the proposal and raised several questions in a December 7, 2005 Memo (attached). The memo questions whether the I-P development standards provide guidance to encourage the combination of uses that are desired in the zone whether the evolution into primarily office uses will adversely impact industrial uses, and whether the lack of a maximum FAR in the I-P zone will attract further office park development? In a December 9, 2005 Addendum (attached) to the above Memo,Long Range Planning Staff address the proposed rezone's compliance with the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan and find that it is consistent with the applicable standards. RESPONSE: The I-P zoning district is characterized as providing "appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office, and small-scale commercial uses . . ." The text in TDC 18.530.020 is ambiguous as to whether these uses are to be combined on a parcel basis or on a district-wide basis. Both are likely to occur as in the proposed office-only development and alternatively in the mixed use campus development of the Pacific Realty properties south of the Upper Boones Ferry/Durham Road intersection and to a lesser degree along SW 74th Avenue. Since office use is a less intense use it is unlikely that there would be any off-site adverse impacts to the remaining lands zoned I-L. The buffering and screening standards in Table 18.745.1 do not differentiate between the two zones and no buffering or screening is required. UPPERBOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE(ZON2005-00009) PAGE 10 OF 11 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2006-02 PC • a • There are many locational factors affecting siting of proposed development. The lack of a maximum FAR in the I-P zone may be an advantage. However, site coverage and buil-ding height standards otherwise limit the development's potential FAR m the I-P. City of Tigard Engineering . Department has reviewed the proposal and concurs with the recommendation by ODOT to condition approval of the proposed zone change to address the transportation performance issues raised in ODOT's February 23,2005 letter. ODOT reviewed the proposed zone change. Marah Danielson, Oregon Department of Transportation Development Review Planner, submitted a comment letter to the City on February 23, 2006. In the letter ODOT recommends conditions of approval to mitigate for the significant effect the proposed.zone change will have on the I.5 southbound ramp terminus/Upper Boones Ferry Rd intersection. ODOT's letter is included above in its entirety. The Cities of Durham, Lake Oswego, and Tualatin, and METRO, and Washington County were notified of the proposed amendment and did not respond. SECTION VII. STAFF ANALYSIS Based on the information above,the proposed zone change complies with or can be made to comply with the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies, subject to conditions of approval contained in this decision. As there is no specific development proposal associated with the proposed zone change, the City of Tigard's Development Code chapters do not apply. Staff finds that the proposed zone change from I-L to I-P does not reduce industrially zoned lands in the City of Tigard or significantly reduce the types of activities that would be allowed on the subject property. The I-P zoning district does allow a broader range of uses that will expand the range of possible tenants for the property in the future. Pursuant to ODOT's concerns, as expressed in their comments on the proposed zone change, the change from I-L to,I-P would have a significant impact on the street system. Therefore, Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve with conditions the requested zone change. . . SECTION IX. CONCLUSION The City of Tigard Planning Commission has APPROVED, Zone Change (ZON2005-00009) - UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE APPLICANT AND ALL PARTIES TO THESE PROCEEDINGS BE NOTIFIED OF THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER. PASSED: THE 61"11 DAY OF MARCH, 2006 BY THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION. Judy Munro,Acting Planning Commission President Dated this 20th day of March, 2006. i \curpin\gary\zon change\ZON2005-00009(Upper Boones Zone Change)\zon2005-00009final order UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE(ZON2005-00009) PAGE 11 OF 11 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2006-02 PC A.,GENDA 11111 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION i MARCH 6, 2006 7:00 p.m. i TIGARD CIVIC CENTER—TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD T I GARD TIGARD, OREGON 97223 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. ELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION PRESIDENT 4. COMMUNICATIONS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS 5. APPROVE MINUTES 6. PUBLIC HEARING 6.1 ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2005-00009 UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE Fbraa/-G/ Continued from December 19, 2005 ands 672006 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval for a Zone Change from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) for approximately six (6) acres located between SW 74th Avenue and Upper Boones Ferry Road. The subject property is currently developed with outdoor storage and older industrial buildings. The applicant envisions developing the property with an office use, which is not permitted in the Light Industrial zone. LOCATION: 15920 SW 74th Avenue and 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and adjoining properties. WCTM 2S113AB,Tax Lots 200/300/400/500; and 2S112DC, Tax Lots 1100/1200/1300. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with.no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian- friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.520. • • 7. 2006/07 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM- PLANNING COMMISSION INPUT 8. DISCUSSION ITEM-99W/HALL BLVD. INTERSECTION 9. OTHER BUSINESS 10. ADJOURNMENT • • Agenda Item: 6.1 Hearing Date: March 6,2005 Time: 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE V PLANNING COMMISSION : - FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD (Includes a 77-day extension) 120 DAYS = 5/18/2006 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NO.: Zone Change (ZON) ZON2005-00009 FILE NAME: UPPER BOONE S FERRY ROAD CHANGE PROPOSAL: The applicant requests a zone change from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I P) for approximately 6 acres located between SW 74th Avenue and Upper Boones Ferry Road. The subject property is currently developed with outdoor storage and older industrial buildings. The applicant envisions developing the property with an office use,which is not permitted in the Light Industrial zone. APPLICANT: Ed Murphy OWNERS: Richard Ackerman,James Wathey LDC Design Group and LaRusso Concrete Co.,Inc. 20085 NW Tanasboume Dr. c/o Ackerman Hillsboro, OR 97124 919 West Point Road Lake Oswego, OR 97034 LOCATION: 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and 15920 SW 74th Avenue and adjoining properties;WGTM 2S113AB,Tax Lots 200, 300,400,and 500; 2S112DC, Tax Lots 1100, 1200, and 1300. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrialgservice, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSE D ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants,personal services and fitness centers,in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. Among other uses,indoor entertainment is allowed. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.530; and Comprehensive Plan Policies 2,3,4, 5,7,8,9 and 12. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission Approve With Conditions the requested Zone Change. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 3-6-2006 PUBLIC HEARING ZON2005-00009/UPPER BOONE S FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE PAGE 1 OF 11 • • SECTION III. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The applicant shall contribute to the City their "proportionate share" of the eastbound right turn lane at the I-5 southbound ramp terminal/UpperBoones Ferry Rd intersection. Proportionate Share= s/(f-e) + s)''100 = 45/((3380-2650) + 45)*100 = 5.81% See attached letter from ODOT for details of how the proportionate share was calculated. 2. The applicant shall contribute to the City their"proportionate share" of the improvement costs for providing a second southbound through lane and a southbound right-turn lane at the Durham Road/Upper Boones Ferry Road intersection. The City Engineer will determine the proportionate share. SECTION IV. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History In the late 1970's the subject 6-acre property was zoned M-3 Industrial. In 1983 the M-3 zone was replaced by the I-P (Industrial Park)—and I-L (Light industrial) zones with the subject property being designated I-L. The properties are currently used for office and industrial uses, particularly for land intensive outdoor storage of materials and equipment. There are a few older, single-story buildings on the site with some landscaping along Upper Boones Ferry Road. Vicinity Information The site is located within a large industrial/commercial area that borders I-5 and extends from Highway 217 to Bridgeport Road and beyond. The subject property is bordered on the north east,west and most of the south sides by I-P zoning. Approximately 140 feet of the entire perimeter of the site is adjacent.to properties zoned I-L (across Upper Boones Ferry Road). Adjacent uses include a 3-story Class A office building, a lumber yard, single-level industnal/office buildings, and a railroad. Site Information and Proposal Description The applicant is requesting approval to change the existing zone from Tight Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I P) in order to build a class A'office building,which is an allowed use in the I-P zone and not allowed within the I-L zone. The I-P zone still allows for light-industrial uses, however, it also allows for a wider range of uses,making the property more marketable and likely to increase opportunities for a positive economic impact. A pre-application conference held by the applicant for the proposed office use on the subject property indicated that a 3-story,approximately 127,000 square foot office building is anticipated for the subject site. SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.380 Section 18.380.030.A states that the Commission shall decide zone change applications which do not involve comprehensive plan map amendments. Section 18.380.030.B states that a recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application for a quasi-judicial amendment shall be based on all of the following standards: Section 18.380.030.8.1 Demonstration of compliance with all applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designations. The Comprehensive Plan treats the I-L and I-P zoning districts, which together comprise the Light Industrial Comprehensive Plan Designation, interchangeably. The applicable Comprehensive Plan Polices are as follows: STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 3-6-2006 PUBLIC HEARING ZON2005-00009/UPPER BOONE S FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE PAGE 2 OF 11 • • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES 1. GENERAL POLICIES Lila The city shall ensure that this comprehensive plan and all future legislative changes are consistent with the statewide planning goals adopted by the Land Conservation and Development Commission, the Regional Plan adopted by the Metropolitan Service District; Implementation Strategies 1. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map and the Official Zoning District map will reflect the plan policies and apply land use categories in the following manner. j. Light Industrial - Refers to areas deemed appropriate for industrial activities which include manufacturing, processing, assembling, packaging or treatment of products from previously prepared materials and which are devoid of nuisance factors that would adversely affect other properties. The appropriate zoning districts are Light Industrial (I-L) and Industrial Park (I-P) which also permit offices and related uses. The proposed zone change from I-L to I-P complies with the Comprehensive Map designation of "Light Industrial" because the I-P zone is one of the two industrial zoning districts that implement the Light Industrial Comprehensive Plan Designation. The proposed zone changed would- not amend the comprehensive plan and is not a legislative change. However, the land use categories are defined in this section and have been included for clarity. 2. CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT: 2.1.1 The City shall maintain an ongoing citizen involvement program and shall assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process. The applicant's representative sent out notices to surrounding property owners and neighborhood representatives, posted a sign on the property, and held a neighborhood-meeting on September 7, 2005 in accordance with the City of Tigard s neighborhood meeting notification process. According to the minutes of the neighborhood meeting, four property owners were in attendance. Those in attendance discussed the proposed access to the site and the impacts that the proposed office use would have on the area. No objections were given to the proposed zone change. In addition,the City has mailed notice of the Planning Commission hearing to property owners within 500 feet of the subject site, interested citizens, and agencies, and published notice of the hearing pursuant to TDC 18.390.050 for Type III Procedures. FINDING: With these public involvement provisions and the applicant's documented participation, the proposed zone change is consistent with applicable Citizen Involvement policies. 3. NATURAL FEATURES AND OPEN SPACE: 3.1.1 The City shall not allow development in areas having the following development limitations except where it can be shown that established and proven engineering techniques related to a specific site plan will make the area suitable for the proposed development. (Note: this policy does not apply to lands designated as significant wetlands on the floodplain and wetlands map.): a. Areas meeting the definition of wetlands under Chapter 1.26 of the community development code. b. Areas having a severe soil erosion potential; c. Areas subject to slumping, earth slides or movement; d. Areas having slopes in excess of 25%; or e. Areas having severe weak foundation soils. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING OOMMIISSION 3-6-2006 PUBLIC HEARING ZON2005-00009/UPPERBOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE PAGE 3 OF 11 • • The subject site is flat and fully covered by buildings or graveled parking and work areas. The site is approximately 240 feet west of Fanno Creek at its closest point and se arated from it by SW 74th Avenue, railroad tracks, and commercial development. According to the City's inventories, the subject property does not include wetlands or any of the development limitations listed above. However, should any of these development limitations be present on site, at the time of development the applicant would be required to demonstrate through a specific site plan that the area is suitable for the proposed development. FINDING: The proposed zone change is consistent with the applicable Natural Features and Open Space policies. 5. ECONOMY: 5.1 The City shall promote activities aimed at the diversification of the economic opportunities available to Tigard residents with particular emphasis placed on the growth of the local job market. According to the applicant's narrative, the proposed zone change will facilitate a wide range of more employee-intensive uses than the existing I-L zone, so the zone change will stimulate economic development and provide city residents with the opportunity to work near home. In addition, there are positive economic benefits from the proposed office uses, particularly to nearby restaurants and other retail businesses. 5.4 The City shall ensure that new commercial and industrial development shall not encroach into residential areas that have not been designated for commercial or industrial uses. The subject site is surrounded by lands zoned I-P and I-L. The nearest residentially zoned land is approximately 700 feet to the west and is separated from the subject site by a railroad, 74th Avenue, and Fanno Creek The proposed office use would-not encroach into nearby residential areas. FINDING: The proposed zone change is consistent with the applicable Economic policies. 7. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES: 7.1.2 The City shall require as a pre-condition to development approval that; a. Development coincide with the availability of adequate service capacity including: 1. Public water, 2. Public sewer shall be required for new development within the city unless the property involved in over 300 feet from a sewer line and Washington County Health Department approval for a private disposal system is obtained; and 3. Storm drainage. b. The facilities are: 1. Capable of adequately serving all intervening properties and the proposed development; and 2. Designed to city standards. c. All new development utilities to be placed underground. According to the applicant's narrative, the properties are already connected to public water, sewer and storm facilities and that upon preliminary review, there are adequate utilities to serve the site. The proposed office use of the site, subject to approval of this zone change request, will undergo site development review to ensure that public facilities and services are adequate, capable of serving intervening properties, and designed to city standards. FINDING: The proposed zone change is consistent with the applicable Public Facilities and Services policies. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 3-6-2006 PUBLIC HEARING ZON2005-00009/UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE PAGE 4 OF 11 8. TRANSPORTATION: Transportation System 8.1.1 Plan, design and construct transportation facilities in a manner which enhances the livability of Tigard by: a. Proper location and design of transportation facilities. b. Encouraging pedestrian accessibility by providing safe, secure and desirable pedestrian routes. c. Addressing issues of excessive speeding and through traffic on local residential streets through a neighborhood traffic program. The program should address corrective measures for existing problems and assure that development incorporates traffic calming. 8.1.2 Provide a balanced transportation system, incorporating all modes of transportation (including motor vehicle, bicycle, pedestrian,transit and other modes) by: a. The development of and implementation of public street standards that recognize the multi-purpose nature of the street right-of-way for utility, pedestrian, bicycle, transit, truck and auto use. b. Coordination with Tri-met, and/or any other transit providers serving Tigard, to improve transit service to Tigard. Fixed route transit will primarily use arterial and collector streets in Tigard. Development adjacent to transit routes will provide direct pedestrian accessibility. c. Construction of bicycle lanes on all arterials and collectors within Tigard consistent with the bicycle master. All schools, parks, public facilities and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a bikeway. d. Construction of sidewalks on all streets within Tigard. All schools parks, public facilities and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a sideway. e. Development of bicycle and pedestrian plans which link to recreational trails. f. Design local streets to encourage a reduction in trip length by providing connectivity and limiting out-of-direction travel and provide connectivity to activity centers and destinations with a priority for bicycle and pedestrian connections. g. Tigard will participate in vehicle trip reduction strategies developed regionally targeted to achieve non-single occupant vehicle levels outlined in Table 1.3 of the Regional Transportation Plan. h. Tigard will support the development of a commuter rail system as part of the regional transit network. The Transportation Goal policies and implementation strategies are largely directed at the City and include objectives that create the framework for ensuring that the transportation system is adequate for all modes of travel at the time development occurs. These objectives are implemented by the Development Code standards that apply during development review. 8.1.4 Set and maintain transportation performance measures that: a. Set a minimum intersection level of service standard for the City of Tigard and requires all public facilities to be designed to meet this standard. b. Set parking ratios to provide adequate parking, while providing an incentive to limit the use of fe single occupant vehicle. c. Encourage working with other transportation providers in Washington County, including Tri-Met,Metro and ODOT to develop, operate and maintain intelligent transportation systems, including coordination of traffic. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 3-6-2006 PUBLIC HEARING ZON2005-00009/UPPER BOONE S FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE PAGE 5 OF 11 • • Marah Danielson, Oregon Department of Transportation Development Review Planner, commented on the subject zone change proposal in a letter to the City on February 23, 2006: We have reviewed the applicant's proposal to rezone six acres from light industrial (I-L) to industrial park (I-P). The site is in the vicinity of the Upper Boones Ferry Rd/I-5 interchange and the Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Durham Rd intersection. ODOT has jurisdiction of these State highway facilities and an interest in assuring that the proposed zone change is consistent with the identified function, capacity and performance standard of this facility. According to the 1999 Oregon Highway Plan (OHP), I-5 is classified as an Interstate highway facility and Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Durham Rd is classified as a District highway facility. ODOT has jurisdiction over the SW and NW legs of the Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Durham Rd intersection. The performance standard for these facilities is 0.99 volume to capacity(v/c) ratio. For zone changes and comprehensive plan amendments local governments must make findings that the proposed amendment complies with the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) OAR 660-012- 0060. There must be substantial evidence in the record to either make the finding of"no significant effect" on the transportation system, or if there is a significant effect assurance that the allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity, and performance standard of the transportation facility as measured at the end of the planning period identified in the City's Transportation System Plan or for state highways apply the highway mobility standard (volume-to- capacity ratio) identified in the Oregon Highway Plan over a planning horizon of the adopted local transportation system plan or 15 years from the proposed date of amendment adoption,whichever is greater(OHP Action 1F2). Oregon Highway Plan (OHP) Action 1F6 applies to situations where the highway facility is operating above the OHP mobility standard and transportation improvements are not planned within the planning horizon to bring performance to standard, the performance standard is to avoid further degradation. If the proposed zone change or comprehensive plan amendment increases the volume- to-capacity ratio further,it will significantly affect the facility. Findings for the I-5 southbound ramp terminus on Upper Boones Ferry Rd intersection ODOT Region 1 Traffic has reviewed the traffic impact study(ITS) prepared by Kittelson and Assoc January 18th, 2006 for impacts to the I-5 southbound ramp terminus on Upper Boones Ferry Rd. In the planning horizon year 2021 the v/c with the existing zoning at the intersection will be 1.09 and with the proposed zoning will be 1.10 both of which exceed the OHP maximum v/c of 0.99. As per OHP action 1F6, with this increase in the v/c ratio means that the proposed zone change will significantly effect the I-5 southbound ramp terminus/Upper Boones Ferry Rd intersection. To mitigate for the significant effect, Kittelson proposes to optimize the signal timing to bring the v/c back to the current zoning level. Optimizing the signal timing is not adequate mitigation because ODOT relies on signal timing to maintain optimal intersection function for vehicles getting off the interstate and may adjust as necessary when conditions change. Based on ODOT's analysis, an eastbound right turn lane is warranted at the intersection and would improve the operation of the intersection. Because the proposed zone change only increases the v/c ratio slightly from 1.09 to 1.10, ODOT recommends that the City require the applicant to contribute their "proportionate share" towards the installation of an eastbound right turn lane. ODOT requests the City collect money towards this improvement on our behalf. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 3-6-2006 PUBLIC HEARING ZON2005-00009/UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE PAGE 6 OF 11 • • Recommended Condition of Approval The applicant shall contribute to the City their"proportionate share" of the eastbound right turn lane at the I-5 southbound ramp terminal/Upper Boones Ferry Rd intersection. Proportionate Share=s/(f-e) +s)"100 =45/((3380-2650) +45)"100 =5.81% s = 2021 Total PM Peak Hour Intersection Trips w/ Proposed Zoning (TIS figure 4) — 2021 Total PM Peak Hour Intersection Traffic w/ Current Zoning(TIS figure 3) =45 ff-e) =background traffic growth =2021 Total PM Peak Hour Intersection Trips w/ Current Zoning(TIS figure 3) = 3380 e=2006 Total PM Peak Hour Intersection Trips w/ Current Zoning (figure 1) =2650 Additional Comments The ODOT Rail Division has reviewed the TIS for impacts of the proposed zone change on the public rail crossing on Durham Rd. There is an existing queuing problem across the rail tracks. City staff has indicated that the City will be making a "reasonably likely" determination for funding of the identified widening of Durham Rd to 5 lanes in the City's TSP. The widening of the rail road crossing will require a Rail Order be obtained from the ODOT Rail Division. As part of the Rail Order, the safety of the crossing will need to be evaluated and upgraded as necessary to address crossing safety. ODOT appreciates the City's willingness to work together to collect funds to address the capacity constraints at the I-5 southbound ramp terminal intersection. We look forward to working with the City to develop a reasonable travel shed and proportionate share formula for collecting money towards the eastbound right turn lane from future proposed developments under existing zoning to improve the capacity at the intersection. The City of Tigard Engineering Department concurs with ODOT"s conclusion. Therefore, conditions will be imposed consistent with the transportation performance measures of Section 8.1.4, as identified below. 8.2 Trafficways 8.2.1 The city shall plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. 8.2.2 The city shall provide for efficient management of the transportation planning process within the city and the metropolitan area through cooperation with other federal, state, regional and local jurisdictions. 8.2.3 The city shall require as a precondition to development approval that: A. Development abut a publicly dedicated street orhave adequate Access approved by the appropriate approval authority; B. Street right-of-way be dedicated where the street is substandard in width; C. The developer commit to the construction of the streets,curbs And sidewalks to city standards within the development; D. Individual developers participate in the improvement of existing streets, curbs and sidewalks to the extent of the development's impacts; E. Street improvements be made and street signs or signals be provided when the development is found to create or intensify a traffic hazard; F. Transit stops, bus turnout lanes and shelters be provided when the proposed use of a type which generates transit ridership; G. Parking spaces be set aside and marked for cars operated by disabled persons and that the spaces be located as close as possible to the entrance designed for disabled persons; and H. Land be dedicated to implement the bicycle/pedestrian corridor in accordance with the adopted plan. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 3-6-2006 PUBLIC HEARING ZON2005-00009/UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE PAGE 7 OF 11 • • The Transportation Goal olicies and implementation strategies are largely directed at the City and include objectives that create the framework for ensuring that the transportation system is adequate for all modes of travel at the time development occurs. These objectives are implemented by the Development Code standards that apply during development review. According to the applicant's narrative, the proposed subsequent development anticipates reducing the number oi access points into the site from four to two and eliminates the driveway crossing of the railroad tracks. As a result access to and from the subject property would be made safer. The City may require additional dedication of land to meet current street right-of-way equirements on Upper Boones Ferry Road. However, the dedication of right-of-way will be addressed under Site Development Review. The proposed office use is likely to generate increased transit ridership. Tri-Met bus routes 38, 76, and 96 serve the subject site with a bus stop located directly in front of the site on Upper Boones Ferry Road and SW 72nd Avenue. The applicant states they will work with Tri-Met to make any reasonable pedestrian or transit-oriented improvements that will encourage transit ridership. Any proposed development for the subject site will be required to meet the standards of Section 18.-810 of the Tigard Development Code regarding transit facilities during development review. The Site Plan will also be reviewed by Tri-Met as part of the Site Development Review application. All on-site parking and circulation for any proposed development will be done to City specifications as required by the Tigard Development Code. FINDING: As shown in the foregoing analysis, the City's Comprehensive Plan Transportation Polices have been met with the exception of the Transportation Performance Measures. City Engineering Staff concurs with ODOT's conclusion regarding the transportation performance measures. Therefore, with imposition of the following conditions, the transportation policies can be met. CONDITIONS: • The applicant shall contribute to the City their "proportionate share" of the eastbound right turn lane at the I-5 southbound ramp terminal/Upper Boones Ferry Rd intersection; and • The applicant shall contribute to the City their "proportionate share" of the improvement costs for providing a second southbound through lane and a southbound right-turn lane at the Durham Road/Upper Boones Ferry Road intersection. The City Engineer will determine the proportionate share. 9. ENERGY: 9.1.3 The City shall encourage land use development which emphasizes sound energy conservation, design and construction. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 3. The City shall locate higher densities and intensities of land use in proximity to existing and potential transit routes specifically with convenient access to federal and state highways, arterials and major collector streets. 8. The City shall coordinate with and support public and private planning efforts that advocate alternative forms of transportation such as mass transit, carpooling, ride share, bicycling and walking for commuter purposes. The site is located on Upper Boones Ferry Road (an arterial) which is within 1/4 mile of I-5 and 1/2 mile of two I-5 interchanges. Two other arterials, SW 72nd Avenue and SW Durham Road intersect with Upper Boones Ferry Road within 500 feet of the subject site. The proposed zone change would allow office use of the site which would be a more intense use in terms of vehicle trips per day than industrial uses currently aflowed. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 3-6-2006 PUBLIC HEARING ZON2005-00009/UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE PAGE 8 OF 11 • • • According to the applicant's narrative, future employees and visitors may walk, bicycle, car-pool, take a bus, or drive to the site. These modes will be addressed during development review of any subsequently proposed use of the site. FINDING: The proposed zone change will allow for an efficient use of the transportation system to conserve energy, consistent with the applicable Energy policies. 12. LOCATIONAL CRITERIA: 12.3 INDUSTRIAL. The intent of the industrial land use designation is to: 1. Provide for the designation of suitable lands for industrial use; 2. Provide for economic growth and development; 3. Protect existing and otential lands suitable for industrial development from encroachment by non-industrial or incompatible uses; 4. Provide land for industrial use by type to minimize the impact on surrounding development; and 5. Take advantage of existing transportation facilities. Industrial lands are classified as: Heavy industrial lands are areas intended to provide for manufacturing, processing and assembling activities. Uses within this classification are characterized by large buildings and large storage areas and as having associated external effects such as smoke, noise, odor or visual pollution. Light industrial lands are areas intended to provide for manufacturing, rocessing assembling and related office activities. Uses within this classification are of-a size and scale which makes them generally compatible with other non-industrial uses and which have no off-site effects. The land use map designates specific areas of the city for industrial development. Over time, however, there may be a demand for new sites. Therefore, the following policy will apply in making such decisions. 12.3.1 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE THAT: a. Sites for heavy industrial development shall be: (1) Separated by topography established buffers, transportation or other non- residential land uses from residentially developed.areas. (2) Located in areas having rail service, arterial or major collector access. b. Sites for light industrial development shall be: (1) Buffered from residential areas to ensure that privacy and the residential character of the area are preserved. (2) Located on an arterial or collector street and that industrial traffic shall not be channeled through residential areas. c. The site shall be of a size and shape which will provide for the short and log range needs of the use. d. The land intended for development shall have an average site topography of less than 6% grade, or that it can be demonstrated that through engineering techniques all limitations to development and the provision of services can be mitigated. e. It can be demonstrated that associated lights, noise and other external effects will not interfere with the activities and uses on surrounding properties. f. All other applicable plan policies can be met. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 3-6-2006 PUBLIC HEARING ZON2005-00009/UPPER BOONE S FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE PAGE 9 OF 11 • • The site is buffered from residential areas and is located on an arterial street that provides connection to other arterials and collectors without going through a residential neighborhood. The site is appropriate for the uses allowed in the I-P zone because it is level and at 6 acres is an adequate size and shape for the intended office use as proposed in the applicant's narrative. The uses allowed in the proposed I-P zone are less intense in terms of environmental impacts than those allowed in the I-L zone and the industrial uses in the I-P zone are prohibited from creating adverse off-site impacts such as noise, vibration, glare, outdoor lighting and odors. The subject site is almost completely surrounded by properties zoned I-P, so the proposed zone change will make the site more compatible with its surroundings, consistent with the Locational Criteria for lands zoned Light Industrial. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies outlined above have been adequately addressed. 18.380.030.B.2 Demonstration of compliance with all applicable standards of any provision of this code or other applicable implementing ordinance; and- FINDING: The proposed zone change does not include a specific development proposal at this time. However, during Site Development Review, any new development will be required to meet all of the current Tigard Development Code standards of the I-P zone. 18.380.030.B.3 Evidence of change in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to the property which is the subject of the development application. Staff reviewed the zoning history of the industrial zoned lands south of SW Bonita Road, east of SW 74th Avenue, west of I-5 and north of Tualatin in the vicinity of the proposed zone change and found that since the conversion from M3 industrial zoning to I-L and I-P in 1983,there has been a steady conversion of I-L zoned lands to I-P zoned land. Of approximately 254 acres zoned I-L in this area in 1983, approximately 90 acres, or 35%, have been converted to I-P. The proposed zone change would convert an additional 2.4% of this area to I-P. In 1983 the subject site was bordered on two sides by I-P zoned properties. Adjacent lands to the north and southeast were subsequently converted to the I-P zone. Today the subject site is virtually surrounded by lands zone I-P. The applicant's narrative provides a broader perspective regarding evidence of change in the community including the le islative conversion of industrial zoned lands to mixed use commercial an employment (MJE) districts in the Washington Square sector of Tigard to the north, and Tualatin's conversion of industrial zoned lands to mixed use commercial in the Bridgeport Village area to the south. The applicant asserts that the proposed zone change and prospective office development reflects a maturation of the market for Class "A" office buildings in the Wilsonville/Kruse Wayl-5 corridor. FINDING: The foregoing. demonstrates that there has been a significant and steady change (conversion of lands zoned I-L to I-P) in the neighborhood and that the proposed zone change represents a further incremental change consistent with this trend. There is no apparent evidence of a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map. SECTION VI. ADDITIONAL CITY STAFF AND OUTSIDE AGENCY COMMENTS • City of Tigard Public Works Department have reviewed this proposal and offered no comments or objections City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and offered no comments or objections. City of Tigard Long Range Planning Department has reviewed the proposal and raised several questions in a December 7, 2005 Memo (attached). The memo questions whether the I-P development standards provide guidance to encourage the combination of uses that are desired in the zone whether the evolution into primarily office uses will adversely impact industrial uses, and whether the lack of a maximum FAR in the I-P zone will attract further office park development? STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 3-6-2006 PUBLIC HEARING ZON2005-00009/UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE PAGE 10 OF 11 • • In a December 9, 2005 Addendum (attached) to the above Memo, Long Range Planning Staff address the proposed rezone's compliance with the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan and find that it is consistent with the applicable standards. RESPONSE: The I-P zoning district is characterized as providing "appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office, and small-scale commercial uses . . ." The text in TDC 18.530.020 is ambiguous as to whether these uses are to be combined on a parcel basis or on a district-wide basis. Both are likely to occur as in the proposed office-only development and alternatively in the mixed use campus development of the Pacific Realty properties south of the Upper Boones Ferry/Durham Road intersection and to a lesser degree along SW 74th Avenue. Since office use is a less intense use it is unlikely that there would be any off-site adverse impacts to the remaining lands zoned I-L. The buffering and screening standards in Table 18.745.1 do not differentiate between the two zones and no buffering or screening is required. There are many locational factors affecting siting of proposed development.The lack of a maximum FAR in the I-P zone may be an advantage. However, site coverage and building height standards otherwise limit the development's potential FAR in the I-P. City of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and concurs with the recommendation by ODOT to condition approval of the proposed zone change to address the transportation performance issues raised in ODOT's February 23,2005 letter. ODOT reviewed the proposed zone change. Marah Danielson, Oregon Department of Transportation Development Review Planner, submitted a comment letter to the City on February 23, 2006. In the letter ODOT recommends conditions of approval to mitigate for the significant effect the proposed zone change will have on the I-5 southbound ramp terminus/Upper Boones Ferry Rd intersection. ODOT's letter is included above in its entirety. The Cities of Durham, Lake Oswego, and Tualatin, and METRO, and Washington County were notified of the proposed amendment and did not respond. SECTION VII. STAFF ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION Based on the information above,the proposed zone change complies with or can be made to comply with the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies, subject to conditions of approval contained in this decision. As there is no specific development proposal associated with the proposed zone change, the City of Tigard's Development Code chapters do not apply. Staff finds that the proposed zone change from I-L to I-P does not reduce industrially zoned lands in the City of Tigard or significantly reduce the types of activities that would be allowed on the subject property. The I-P zoning district does allow a broacer range of uses that will expand the range of possible tenants for the property in the future. Pursuant to ODOT's concerns, as expressed in their comments on the proposed zone change, the change from I-L to I-P would have a significant impact on the street system. Therefore, Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve with conditions the requested zone change. 111) at February 24, 2006 PREPARED iY: 4 aryPagenstecher DATE Associate Planner i /■ arillif February 24,2006 APPROVED BY: Dick Be Torff DATE Planning ager c\curpin\gary\zon change\ZON2005-00009(UpperBoones Zone Change)\zon2005-00009staff report STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 3-6-2006 PUBLIC HEARING ZON2005-00009/UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE PAGE 11 OF 11 .ammim r • ° CITY of TIGARD \ GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM � r \ . IQ VICINITY MAP .1 U . . ) lY O . • ����� ZON2005-00009 5F III i jP UPPER BOONES FERRY •1_ igg ROAD ZONE CHANGE•.z... . 4;:t. (0,--<> °_ \-,,..... . ,_. .. ..... . I • L ` \ \ i ' SRS FE•R • • • "Alt 11/4. *All \ . Valk • Abi / \q� 0 el 1 ,QO sr . Tigard Area Map • A 5 ��� N • °Off � !� 0 100 200 300 400 Feet ` Q.1n • 1".324 feel • � O G -r Z Al J • ly I IIII 'per co City of Tigard Information on this map Is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. • 13125 SW Hall Blvd -+? Tigard,OR 97223 • (503)639-4171 • I 1 a http:/Mww.ci.tlgard.or.us Community Development • • Plot date:Nov 14,2005;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR • • MEMORANDUM TO: Gary Pagenstecher ,.io v11441*11,111LI FROM: Long Range Planning RE: (ZON) 2005-00009 Upper Boones Ferry Road Zone Change DATE: December 7, 2005 The applicants request a zone change for 6 parcels totaling 6 acres which are zoned I-L (Light Industrial.) The applicants wish to change the zoning designation to I-P (Industrial Park.) The comprehensive plan designation would remain Light Industrial. Although plans have not been finalized, the applicants state the eventual project would be an office park of approximately 127,000 sq. ft. Existing conditions: The site is zoned I-L, but is surrounded on three sides by properties zoned I-P. The site is located less than half a mile from the Bridgeport Village retail and office development. The site is near on and off ramps to 1-5, and lies near the intersection of two arterials, SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and SW 72nd Avenue. A third arterial, SW Durham Road is only one property away to the southwest. A railway lines runs along the site to the west. Fanno Creek Park lies across SW 74th Ave, to the west. According to the Washington County Assessor, the sum of the land values for the six parcels is $2,230,070. Three of the parcels have structures present and three are vacant. The three structures have a total value of $801,140. For these three parcels the building value as a percent of total value is .45, indicating the parcels are somewhat underutilized. Zoning History The site, currently zoned I-L, had the old industrial zoning designation M-3. In 1983, this zoning designation was replaced by two zones, I-L and I-P. In the 1980's several nearby properties were rezoned to I-P, notably the nearby PacTrust business park. A review of City records reveals that since 1991 there have been four applications to change zones from Light Industrial to Industrial Park. Two applications, from 1991 and 1994 lapsed without action. In 1994 an 8.96 acre area was re-zoned I-P. The most recent approval was in 2002, for an application to allow an indoor entertainment facility (Sy-Kart Indoor Racing Center.) From 1990-1994 there were at least 4 cases of rezoning I-P and I-L land to C-G throughout the city. • • It appears from a cursory review of zoning maps that additional parcels were rezoned to I-P between 1997 and 1999, but the information could not be found in the records. The zone changes may have been attached to other types of cases. Time constraints did not allow further investigation. Zoning Discussion: The most important difference between I-P and I-L zones is in allowable uses. The Industrial Park zone allows office uses outright and up to 20% square footage of retail uses, while the Light Industrial zone forbids these uses. This project is planned to be primarily office with potential retail uses. The Tigard Development Code states that "the I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting." It is not stated whether the zoning intended "appropriate locations" for this combination of uses to be on one site, or throughout the district. There is a question of whether this proposed zone change_ would encourage the intended mix of uses, or whether it would accelerate the conversion of the district from primarily industrial uses to primarily office. The development standards of I-P and I-L are similar in terms of maximum site coverages, height, etc (see Table 1.) Table 1: Development Standards Comparison Chart I-L I-P MUE (Tigard Triangle) Max Height 45 ft. 45 ft. 45 ft. Max. Site Coverage 85% 75%(80%) 85% Min. Landscaping 15% 25% (20%) 15% Max FAR - - .4 The Industrial Zone development standards do not necessarily support the combination of uses that are intended. This can be seen by the fact that exclusively office projects are approvable in the I-P zone. As a point of comparison, Tigard's Triangle overlay zone was intended to support a mix of office and retail uses. If this project was proposed for the Tigard Triangle, the maximum allowable FAR would be .4, and additional design guidelines would have to be met. With the I-P zone standards, the applicants preliminarily propose a project with a square footage of 127,000, (an FAR of .48.) Current Industrial Buildable.Lands Approximately 73 acres of land zoned I-L and I-P were identified in the Tigard 2004 buildable lands inventory (See Map 1). This application would not affect this supply, as it is a redevelopment project. However the approval of zone changes like this could encourage more requests for zone changes. • • Discussion: A review of recent land use applications does not reveal a trend of requests for zone changes from I-L to I-P. However, the applicants' request could be a sign the real estate market is changing. Tigard's industrial land is concentrated along I-5 and Highway 217. This transportation access also makes it attractive to office and commercial development. The site of the proposed zone change and the surrounding area are especially visible and accessible to auto traffic. According to a June 2005 Westside Economic Alliance presentation, the 1-5 Office Market in general is strong due to: -The proximity to top mangers homes -Excellent transportation access. -The lack of the Multnomah County business tax and income tax surcharge. The same presentation also detailed the 1-5 South submarket, which this site is close to (the boundaries and names of real estate submarkets differ depending on the source used.) The weaknesses of the sub-market are its limited office inventory and its industrial/warehouse character. The presenters forecasted that this market would have new office development, declining vacancy rate, and increasing rental rates. The nearby Kruse Way office/commercial market is very tight, with vacancy rates of 4%, compared to a regionwide average of 11.7%. According to a commercial real estate broker, this area might be subject to a spillover effect from the success of the Kruse Way developments. Additionally, the nearby Bridgeport Village development is considered an amenity for Class A office space. A possible example of this market change is the Durham Plaza, a Class A Office development under construction on Upper Boones Ferry Road (in nearby Tualatin, .3 miles south of the applicant's site.) (Oregonian 6/23/05) Conclusions/Questions While the intent of the I-P and I-L zones are compatible, do the I-P development standards provide guidance to encourage the combination of uses that are desired in the zone? If the current standards allow the I-P district to evolve into primarily office development will this negatively impact industrial uses? There appears to be developing market pressures that could encourage future office park proposals. Does the fact that more FAR is potentially obtainable under I-P zoning • than in other zones make I-P parcels more attractive to further office park projects? • • MEMORANDUM A, 111140Vi TO: Gary Pagenstecher FROM: . Long Range Planning RE: (ZON) 2005-00009 Upper Boones Ferry Road Zone Change. DATE: December 9, 2005 Addendum: Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan compliance Background In 2004 Metro revised Title 4 (Industrial and Other Employment Areas) of the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan. While the City of Tigard is in the process of bringing its code in compliance with the Metro Functional Plan, proposed development in Metro-identified Industrial and Other Employment Areas must be accordance with the Plan. According the Map of Industrial and Other Employment Areas (Exhibit C,) the parcels in the proposed zone change case ((ZON) 2005-00009) are classified as Employment Land. Analysis According to Title 4, 3.07.440, Protection of Employment Areas, local governments "shall limit new and expanded commercial retail uses to those appropriate in type and size to serve the needs of businesses, employees, and residents of Employment Areas." The relevant subsections in the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan are: 1) 3.07.440.B: "Except as provided in subsections C, D and E, a city or county shall not approve a commercial retail use in an Employment Area with more than 60,000 square feet of gross leasable area in a single building, or commercial retail uses with a total of more than 60,000 square feet of retail sales area on a single.lot or parcel, or on contiguous lots or parcels, including those separated only by transportation right-of- way." Analysis: Retail commercial uses are Restricted uses in Tigard's I-P Zone. Commercial retail uses are limited to 20% of the entire square footage within a development complex and these uses cannot exceed 60,000 square feet of gross leasable area per building or • • business. The proposed zone change is to I-P, whose requirements are in compliance with this subsection. 2) 3.07.440 C. "A city or county whose zoning ordinance applies to an Employment Area and is listed on Table 3.07-4 may continue to authorize commercial retail uses with more than 60,000 square feet of gross leasable area in that zone if the ordinance authorized those uses on January 1, 2003." Analysis: Table 3.07-4 lists two zones for Tigard in this category. General Commercial and Commercial Professional. The proposed zone change is from Light Industrial to Industrial Park, so this section is not applicable. 3) 3.07.440 D. "A city or county whose zoning ordinance applies to an Employment Area and is not listed on Table 3.07-4 may continue to authorize commercial retail uses with more than 60,000 square feet of gross leasable area in that zone if: 1. The ordinance authorized those uses on January 1, 2003; 2. Transportation facilities adequate to serve the commercial retail uses will be in place at the time the uses begin operation; and 3. The comprehensive plan provides for transportation facilities adequate to serve other uses planned for the Employment Area over the planning period." 4) 3.07.440 E. "A city or county may authorize new commercial retail uses with more than 60,000 square feet of gross leasable area in Employment Areas if the uses: 1. Generate no more than a 25 percent increase in site generated vehicle trips above permitted non-industrial uses; and 2. Meet the Maximum Permitted Parking—Zone A requirements set forth in Table 3.07-2 of Title 2 of the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan." Analysis of 3 and 4: Retail commercial uses are Restricted uses in Tigard's I-P Zone. Commercial retail uses are limited to 20% of the entire square footage within a development complex and these uses cannot exceed 60,000 square feet of gross leasable area per building or business. These sections are not applicable because the I-P zone does not allow retail uses greater than 60,000 square feet. The proposed zone change of the parcels to I-P would result in a development that appears to be consistent with the Metro requirements. i I I JO 1 CITY of TIGARD II 2 .. h GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM ., VICINITY MAP . p U ���y 10N2005-00009 � W ��0°� UPPER BOONES FERRY �Qe , ROAD ZONE CHANGE• x. 1111 riiir �N� • EN NM _Z ``\ ` i ' r•S FERR Ci) 40,S !< ....! "WI `,\` BULL. 7.�.��� �O � _ . �O sr Tigard Area Mop • 5'�� N 0 V '.^^ 0 100 200 300 400 Feet 0 S Q� V/ ,Q 1 324 feet •`OG Z • � A y csi -p° CO City of Tigard Information on this map Is for general location only and should be yenned with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 l I (503)039-4171 s http:llwww.ci.ligard.or.us Community Development . Plot evelopment Plot date:Nov 14,2005;C:\magicWIAGIC03.APR TIGARD PLANmNG COMMISSION A!► CITY OF TIGARD OREGON NOTICE: PEOPLE WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST PRINT THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS ON THIS SHEET. AGENDA ITEM#: Page_of 11 DATE OF HEARING: I L/I / 0 S CASE NUMBER(S): 2 OU c ' 000d (1 OWNER/APPLICANT: � LOCATION: ► ci 2 v (-`) Li I\ s C 0 S i,1 r c PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME, ADDRESS, AND ZIP CODE PROPONENT (For the proposal) OPPONENT (Against the proposal) (Print Name/Address/Zip&Affiliation) (Print Name/Address/Zip&Affiliation) Name: �'� (AA u ✓ Name: y _ _ Address: Cl/ '/ t ) u c S, Address: Y _ --° -_ i Ci : c' • State: Zit: d i C L u 1 Name: Name: Address: Address: City: State: Zip: City: State: Zip: Name: Name: \ Address: Address: City: State: Zip: City: State: Zip: Name: Name: Address: Address: City: State: Zip: City: State: Zip: Name: Name: Address: Address: City: State: Zip: City: State: Zip: • • LDC Design Group February 6, 2006 aParoU company Gary Pagenstecher, Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Zone Change application Dear Mr. Pagenstecher: On behalf of the applicants, I am requesting that the Planning Commission continue the hearing on the proposed zoning map amendment until March 6, 2006. We have addressed the transportation-related comments from the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), and plan to submit our application, with the supplemental traffic analysis, tomorrow. Thank-you for your consideration of this request. If you have any additional questions regarding this request, please contact me. - Sinc- ely, / Ed urphy, £ICP cc. Richard Akerman LaRusso Concrete Kevin VandenBrink - Macadam Forbes Brian Bennett, OPUS Northwest, LLC 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro,OR 97124 P 503.858.4242 F 503.645.5500 E hillsboro@ldcdesign.com www.ldcdesign.com Hillsboro.OR Tillamook,OR Vancouver,WA Bellevue,WA Coeur d'Alene,ID Rocklin,CA Clermont,-FL • 0 LDC,...,_ February 6, 2006 • Design Group a Porati company Dick Bewersdorff, Planning Manager RECEIVED PLANNING City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. FEB 0 8 2006 Tigard, Oregon 97223 CITY OF TIGARD RE: Zone Change application Dear Mr. Bewersdorff: Attached are ten copies of a zone change application for a group of properties off Upper Boones Ferry Road, between Durham Road and 72nd Avenue. We have previously submitted the following: ♦ A check for the application fee of$3040; ♦ A completed and signed application form; ♦ Two sets of stamped and addressed envelopes; ♦ One copy of a title report showing ownership; ♦ A signed and certified affidavit of posting and mailing. . We included a traffic impact analysis by Kittelson & Associates with the application we submitted in November, 2005. In this submittal, we have included an addendum to the traffic report, dated January 18, 2006, in response to comments provided by ODOT in a letter dated November 29, 2005. We have also included an updated site plan and an elevation drawing of the proposed building with Exhibit G. All of the other materials are unchanged from our November submittal. Please let me know if you need anything else or have any questions. Thanks Dick. Sinc rel , Li . Ed urphy, AI P 20085 NWTanasbourne Drive cc. Gary Pagenstecher, Associate Planner Hillsboro,OR 97124 Richard Akerman P 503.858.4242 F 503.645.5500 LaRusso Concrete E hillsboro @Idcdesign.com Kevin VandenBrink—Macadam Forbes www.ldcdesign.com Brian Bennett, OPUS Northwest, LLC Hillsboro,OR Tillamook,OR Vancouver,WA Bellevue,WA Coeur d'Alene,ID Rocklin,CA Clermont,FL Gary Pagenstecher- Re: Request for continuance, ZC 2005-00009 Page 1 • • From: Gary Pagenstecher To: Murphy, Ed Date: 1/6/2006 1:34:45 PM Subject: Re: Request for continuance, ZC 2005-00009 Ed, Due to the increased workload from staff changes in the City's Current Planning department(Matt Scheiddiger has left the City and will not be replaced in the near term) and without information yet from ODOT regarding the proposed zone change, I am rescheduling the PC hearing to February 27th..war:Ulia. Please contact me if you have any questions. Gary Gary Pagenstecher Associate Planner City of Tigard 503-718-2434 GaryP @tigard-or.gov >>> "Ed Murphy" <MurphyE @Idcdesign.com> 12/19 10:38 AM >>> Hi Gary and Dick. Attached is a copy of the letter we submitted last Friday asking for a continuance on the Upper Boones Ferry Zone change, in case it's been misplaced. Ed Ed MurphyComprehensive Planning Managerdirect line: 503-352-1136cell phone: 503-314-0677e-mail: murphye @Idcdesign.com LDC Design Group20085 NW Tanasbourne DriveHillsboro, Oregon 97124t: 503.858.4242f: 503.645.5500e: hillsboro @Idcdesign.comw: www.ldcdesign.com OR: Hillsboro, Tillamook I WA: Vancouver, Bellevue I ID: Coeur d'Alene I CA: Sacramento I FL: Clermont DISCLAIMER: This message is intended for the sole use of the individual to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose, or distribute to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete this message. Gary Pagenstecher- FW: FYI, ORS 197.610, related to PAPAS _ Page 1 From: "DANIELSON Marah B" <Marah.B.DANIELSON@odot.state.or.us> To: "Gary Pagenstecher" <garyp @tigard-or.gov> Date: 1/3/2006 3:08:09 PM Subject: FW: FYI, ORS 197.610, related to PAPAs Hi Gary, I happened to be talking to Stacy this morning at DLCD and she hasn't seen a PAPA that has been filed for the Upper Boones Ferry Rd ZC. As per our conversation it is my understanding that if the City needs to make Goal 12 findings that a PAPA ought to be filed. See her message below. Thanks, Marah Original Message From: Stacy Hopkins [mailto:Stacy.Hopkins @state.or.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 12:14 PM To: DANIELSON Marah B Subject: FYI, ORS 197.610, related to PAPAs See 197.610(2)for when a PAPA isn't required. POST-ACKNOWLEDGMENT PROCEDURES 197.610 Local government notice of proposed amendment or new regulation; exceptions; report to commission. (1)A proposal to amend a local government acknowledged comprehensive plan or land use regulation or to adopt a new land use regulation shall be forwarded to the Director of the Department of Land Conservation and Development at least 45 days before the first evidentiary hearing on adoption. The proposal forwarded shall contain the text and any supplemental information that the local government believes is necessary to inform the director as to the effect of the proposal. The notice shall include the date set for the first evidentiary hearing. The director shall notify persons who have requested notice that the proposal is pending. (2) When a local government determines that the goals do not apply to a particular proposed amendment or new regulation, notice under subsection (1) of this section is not required. In addition, a local government may submit an amendment or new regulation with less than 45 days' notice if the local government determines that there are emergency circumstances requiring expedited review. In both cases: (a)The amendment or new regulation shall be submitted after adoption as provided in ORS 197.615 (1) and (2); and (b) Notwithstanding the requirements of ORS 197.830 (2), the director or any other person may appeal the decision to the board under ORS 197.830 to 197.845. (3)When the Department of Land Conservation and Development participates in a local government proceeding, at least 15 days before the final hearing on the proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan or land use regulation or the new land use regulation, the department shall notify the local government of: (a)Any concerns the department has concerning the proposal; and (b)Advisory recommendations on actions the department considers necessary to address the concerns, including, but not limited to, suggested corrections to achieve compliance with the goals. (4) The director shall report to the Land Conservation and Development Commission on whether the director: (a) Believes the local government's proposal violates the goals; and Gary Pagenstecher- FW: FYI, ORS 197.610, related to PAPAs Page 2 (b) Is participating in the local government proceeding. [1981 c.748 §4; 1983 c.827 §7; 1985 c.565 §27; 1989 c.761 §20; 1999 c.622 §1] CC: "HOPKINS Stacy" <Stacy.Hopkins @state.or.us> Gary Pagenstecher- RE: Upper Boones Ferry Rezone _ Page 1 • • From: "DANIELSON Marah B" <Marah.B.DANIELSON @odot.state.or.us> To: "Chris Tiesler" <ctiesler @kittelson.com> Date: 1/3/2006 2:57:33 PM Subject: RE: Upper Boones Ferry Rezone Hi Chris, I have had time to route the TIS to the ODOT Rail Division for review and the ODOT Traffic Unit. ODOT has received confirmation from the City of Tigard that they are prepared to make a "reasonably likely" determination for the additional lanes on Upper Boones Ferry Rd and Durham Rd. I mistakenly stated in my letter dated November 29, 2005 that the Durham Rd. leg of the Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Durham Rd intersection was still under ODOT jurisdiction, I have been corrected it is no longer under ODOT jurisdiction. We have the following response to your e-mail below: The Durham Rd at grade rail crossing is within the Washington County Commuter Rail project area. Any additional vehicle traffic on Durham Road may impact the safety of the existing grade crossing. Commuter trains will run during the PM peak so it is important to analyze how the proposed rezone will effect the rail crossing. Additional Analysis Requested for Rezone: The comparison analysis for the existing year and future 2021 year with and without the rezone should be expanded as follows: Analysis of the Durham Rd/SW 74th Ave intersection with a comparison queuing analysis for the Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Durham Rd and Durham Rd/SW 74th Ave intersections to address potential impacts to the at grade rail crossing. Interconnection of the vehicle traffic signals at Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Durham Rd and Durham Rd/SW 74th Ave to provide railroad preemption should be analyzed to determine if it is needed for crossing safety. Due to the close proximity of the SW Sequoia Parkway/SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd signal to the SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd/I-5 ramp terminal on the west side, we request a comparison queuing analysis for the existing year and future year 2021 with and without the rezone for these intersections. Please let me know if you have any further questions, ODOT requests 10 business days to review traffic impact studies. Please send copies of the updated analysis to: Jason Grassman ODOT Region 1 Traffic 123 NW Flanders St Portland, OR 97213 Dave Lanning, Sr. Crossing Safety Specialist 555 13th St NE Suite 3 Salem, OR 97301 'Gary Pagenstecher- RE: Upper Boones Ferry Rezone Page 2 • • Original Message From: Chris Tiesler[mailto:ctiesler @kittelson.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 5:09 PM To: DANIELSON Marah B Cc: WILSON Timothy J; Julia Kuhn Subject: Upper Boones Ferry Rezone Hi Marah, We have received your comments regarding the proposed Upper Boones Ferry Rezone in your letter dated November 29, 2005 to the City of Tigard. The approach detailed below has been developed to address those comments. Please review this approach and confirm that it will satisfy the outstanding issues contained in your response letter. 1. We will prepare a TPR Analysis memo for year 2021 (15 years beyond 2006)for the three intersections identified - Upper Boones/Sequoia, 1-5 SB Ramp/Carman Drive, and Upper Boones/Durham. This will determine whether or not there is a significant effect on State facilities with the proposed rezone. This analysis will look at both reasonable worst-case scenarios -with and without the proposed zone change. Based on the City's zoning code, under the existing zoning, a General Light-Industrial land use (ITE 110)will be assumed as worst-case. According to their zoning code, a reasonable worst-case building size that will still meet parking and landscaping minimums is approximately 67,000 square feet(6.16 acres x 43,560 sq.ft. x 0.25 Floor Area Ratio= 67,100 sq.ft.) For the proposed zoning, the assumed worst-case land use scenario will be the same use assumed in the TIA (127,000 Office Park- ITE Land Use 750). This is reasonably the largest building that will still meet parking and landscaping minimums under the proposed zoning. 2. Two improvements identified in Tigard's TSP will be assumed for the year 2021 analyses: -widening of Upper Boones Ferry to 5 lanes -widening of Durham Road west of Upper Boones to 5 lanes These are identified in Tables 8-6 and 8-7 of the Tigard TSP as planned, funded improvements. Discussions with City of Tigard staff has confirmed that these improvements are indeed "reasonably likely," and that they would likely be funded through the TIF program. 3. The Upper Boones Ferry Road/Durham Road does not meet operational standards today. As such, this project must show only that the performance standard is not further degraded with the assumed improvements (above) in place beyond it's performance under background traffic conditions in 2021 with the existing reasonable worst-case zoning. Preliminary analysis has shown that with the two improvements listed above in place, that this condition can be satisfied with right-turn overlap phasing for the southbound right-turn. Therefore, it Gary Pagenstecher- RE: Upper Boones Ferry Rezone Page 3 J i► • is likely we will recommend that our project pay for the signal modification at this intersection (TIF creditable), and that remaining TIF monies still be earmarked for improvements at this location. According to the City, it is their intent to use TIF monies to fund the improvements identified above. 4. Previous analyses contained in the September 2005 TIA has demonstrated this rezone to not impact to the public rail crossing on Durham Road. The only recommendation or finding made with reagard to rail crossings in the TIA is to reccomend closing the existing rail crossing in the northwest quadrant of the site to 74th Avenue. 5. We will perform a 2006 queuing analysis at the Upper Boones Ferry Road/Sequoia Parkway intersection to assess whether queues will spill back from the intersection to the SB I-5 ramp terminal. Please let us know at your earliest convenience if these assumptions and approach will satisfy your requests. Sincerely, Christopher B. Tiesler Engineering Associate Kittelson &Associates, Inc. 610 SW Alder Street, Suite 700 Portland, OR 97205-3608 www.kittelson.com <file://www.kittelson.com> ctiesler@kittelson.com 503-228-5230 (Toll Free 1-800-878-5230) 503-273-8169 (fax) Transportation Engineering/ Planning Baltimore 1 Boise 1 Fort Lauderdale 1 Orlando 1 Phoenix 1 Portland 1 Tucson CC: "Julia Kuhn" <jkuhn @kittelson.com>, "GRASSMAN Jason M" <Jason.M.GRASSMAN @odot.state.or.us>, "LANNING C David" <David.LANNING @odot.state.or.us>, "HAYS Michael D *Swede" <Michael.D.HAYS @odot.state.or.us>, "Gary Pagenstecher" <garyp @tigard- or.gov>, "Kim McMillan" <kim @ci.tigard.or.us> • CITY OF TIGARD c.7 PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes December 19, 2005 1. CALL TO ORDER Acting President Commissioner Buehner called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. The meeting was held in the Tigard Civic Center, Town Hall, at 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Commissioners Buehner, Caffall, Haack, Inman, and Meads. Also present was David Walsh, Commission alternate. Commissioners Absent: President Padgett, Commissioners Anderson, Duling, and Munro Staff Present: Dick Bewersdorff, Planning Manager; Matt Scheidegger, Associate Planner; Gus Duenas, City Engineer; Kim McMillan, Development • Review Engineer; Jerree Lewis, Planning Commission Secretary 3. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS David Walsh reported that the Planned Development Review Committee has drafted their recommendations for Planning Commission review and Council approval. It's expected that the Council will hold a hearing in January. - Commissioner Buehner advised that the City Center Advisory Commission presented their recommendations to Council which were approved on November 27th. After receiving input from other governmental agencies, the plan was re- approved on December 13th. The ballot measure was also approved. 4. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES It was moved and seconded to approve the November 7, 2005 meeting minutes as submitted. The motion passed by a vote of 3-0. Commissioners Haack and Caffall abstained. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS Commissioner Buehner announced that item #5.2 would be taken out of order. 5.2 ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2005-00009 UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval for a Zone Change from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) for approximately six (6) acres located between SW 74th Avenue and Upper Boones Ferry Road. The subject property is currently developed with outdoor storage and older industrial buildings. The applicant envisions developing the property with an office use, which is not PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—December 19,2005-Page 1 permitted in the Light Industrial zone. LOCATION: 15920 SW 74th Avenue and 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and adjoining properties. WCTM 2S113AB, Tax Lots 200/300/400/500; and 2S112DC, Tax Lots 1100/1200/1300. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I- P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.520. STAFF REPORT Dick Bewersdorff advised that the applicant submitted a letter requesting a continuance of the hearing until February 6, 2006 (Exhibit A) in order to give them more time to address comments from ODOT. Commissioner Caffall moved to continue the hearing until February 6, 2006. Commissioner Haack seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 5.1 SUBDIVISION (SUB) 2005-00011/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (PDR) 2005-00004/ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2005-00006/ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2005- 00079 DAKOTA GLEN SUBDIVISION — Continued from November 7, 2005 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval for a 24 lot Planned Development Subdivision of 4.97 acres for detached single-family residences. Three single-family residences exist on the site,which have been proposed to be removed. LOCATION: 10970, 11030 and 11060 SW North Dakota Street; WCTM 1 S134DB, Tax Lots 3300, 3400, 3500 and 3700. ZONE: R-4.5: Low- Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters, 18.350, 18.390, 18.430, 1.8.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. Commissioners Haack and Caffall advised that they both had listened to tapes from the first meeting on November 7th and will be able participate in the hearing tonight. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—December 19,2005-Page 2 t.; • S • Commissioner Inman declared a conflict of interest (works for.the applicant) and recused herself from the hearing. Commissioners Haack, Meads, and Buehner reported site visits. STAFF REPORT Associate Planner Matt Scheidegger reported that the original planned development called for 24 lots. At the hearing on November 7t , the Planning Commission suggested reducing the number of lots and increasing some of the lot sizes, did not reach a decision. The applicant is returning for reconsideration of the development, based on the Commission's comments at the previous meeting. Staff recommends approval based on conditions of approval. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Kirsten Van Loo, Alpha Community Development, 9600 SW Oak, Portland, OR 97223, reviewed the revised plan with the Planning Commission (Exhibits B, C, and D). She advised that they removed 1 lot, thus creating 60' wide lots for lots 7 through 11. The open space has increased in size and the western edge of Tract D has been shortened in order to save more trees. Van Loo stated that all yards will have a minimum setback of 15' to the house and 20' to the garage; all street-side setbacks will be 8'. All rear yards will be a minimum of 15', with the exception of lot 14, which will have a 12' minimum setback. Van Loo advised that the applicant submitted a letter to the City regarding dedication of land (Exhibit E). The City asked for additional information which they are in the process of reviewing. Van Loo said they are asking for 50' ROW for the street, from property line to property line. The curb to curb improvement will be 32' (the same as on Torland Street). This allows for parking on both sides. Van Loo advised that they would be adding between 10-12 caliper inches per lot for replacement trees. Between 25-30% of caliper inches removed from the site will be mitigated. For trees that cannot be mitigated on site, the applicant will .mitigate off site or pay a fee in lieu. Commissioner Buehner suggested they choose trees that lose their leaves later in the season so there will be a longer period of time for buffering. Van Loo said the larger lots will allow the option of building single story or partial single story homes rather than two-story. Commissioner Buehner asked if the developer could guarantee that the house for lot 14 will have a smaller footprint to make up for the reduced setback. The applicant advised the purpose of asking for a reduced setback is so they can PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—December 19,2005-Page 3 • • �� achieve a standard size rather than a smaller size. If they had a smaller footprint, they would not need a smaller setback. Also, lot 14 is an internal lot in the subdivision and has no impact on surrounding neighbors. The applicant reported that Tract E will be connected to the street and will have a soft surface (gravel or bark chip). PUBLIC TESTIMONY— IN FAVOR Ann Braun, 10920 SW North Dakota, Tigard, OR 97223, asked about fences. Also, she noted that some of her trees are shown on the site plan and wants to know what will happen to them. The applicant will respond during rebuttal. Dan Dover, 11102 SW Torland St., Tigard, OR 97223, testified that he fully supports the planned development. He believes it is a.much cleaner plan; he likes the open space and believes it will add to quality of life in the neighborhood. John Caufield, 11133 SW Torland St., Tigard, OR 97223, said he thinks the future owners of these homes would prefer this plan over the straight subdivision plan. He likes the open space. Michael Robinson, 1120 NW Couch St., Tenth Floor, Portland, OR 97209, signed up to speak, but did not do so. PUBLIC TESTIMONY— IN OPPOSITION Sean Sullivan, 11295 SW 108th Ave., Tigard, OR 97223, asked for clarification on some points. He appreciates the changes, but has questions. He supports the 50' ROW with the 32' curb-to-curb improvements. What assurance is there that homeowners will maintain the trees? Does the home on lot 17 need to be sprinkled? Can the public get copy of the tree mitigation plan? Also, he is curious about merchantable value of the timber from the property. APPLICANT'S REBUTTAL Kirsten Van Loo made the following responses to comments: • There is not a lot of value to the timber because the trees have to be taken down in pieces. The challenge of removing the trees offsets the value. • Lot 17 has been looked at by the fire marshal; they do meet the standards. Prior to final plat recording and prior to construction of any homes, the fire marshal will review the site plan again. • Trees planted for mitigation are protected by the Development Code. The CC&Rs for the homeowners association further stipulate that the trees have to be maintained. • A copy of the mitigation plan will become part of the public record and will be available to the public. . • The CC&Rs will contain a provision about for the style and type of fences. Typically, the client does not go in and build a fence around the entire PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—December 19,2005-Page 4 • project. If owners want a fence, the CC&Rs stipulate they can install 6' cedar good neighbor-style fences. • In the event the City does not accept dedication of the property, the annual homeowners association fees will cover maintenance of the open space. Van Loo noted that, although the open space tracts will be privately owned, they will be available for public use. • The already-approved subdivision requires removal of the majority of the trees. In response to a question from the Commission, staff advised that, at the moment, the City has no say regarding architectural review of the homes, other than building height. Also in response to a question from the Commission, staff said there is more leeway to save trees with a 50' ROW. Once the construction of the Dakota Street improvements are completed, the applicant will have to provide a final certification of site distance in both directions. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED After brief discussion amongst the Commissioners, Commissioner Meads moved for approval of Subdivision (SUB) 2005-00011/Planned Development Review (PDR) 2005-00004/Zone Change (ZON) 2005-00006/Adjustment (VAR) 2005- 00079 and adoption of the findings and conditions of approval contained in the staff report, based on testimony that was delivered by people at both hearings. Commissioner Caffall seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 6. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE City Engineer Gus Duenas provided a PowerPoint update of the 2005-06 Capital Improvement Program projects (Exhibit F). 7. OTHER BUSINESS The secretary reviewed the Planning Commission calendar for January and • February. 8. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m. .tt-4�J Jerree ewis, Planni g Commission Secretary AT ST: Commissioner retchen Buehner, Acting President PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—December 19,2005-Page 5 • • • {� LDC December 16, 2005 Design Group a Porati company Gary Pagenstecher, Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Zone Change application Dear Mr. Pagenstecher: On behalf of the applicants, I am requesting that the Planning Commission continue the hearing on the proposed zoning map amendment until February 6, 2006. This will allow us more time to address transportation-related comments from the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). Our application was deemed complete by the staff on November 4, 2005, and scheduled for a hearing before the Planning Commission on December 19th. We received a letter from ODOT dated November 29th commenting on the proposed • zone change, and requesting some additional traffic evaluation. We are confident that we can respond to ODOT's comments within the next few weeks and can provide the City with an addendum to the traffic analysis report by mid-January. This supplemental information can then be reviewed by City staff, and provided to the Planning Commission with the rest of our application materials and the staff report. Thank-you for your consideration of this request. If you have any additional questions regarding this request, please contact me. • Since ly Ed Murphy, A CP 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro,OR 97124 P 503.858.4242 cc. Richard Akerman F503.6455500 LaRusso Concrete Ehillsboro @Idcdesign.com Kevin VandenBrink - Macadam Forbes www.ldcdesign.com Brian Bennett, OPUS Northwest, LLC Hillsboro,oR Tillamook,OR Vancouver,wA Bellevue,WA Coeur d'Alene,ID Rocklin,CA Clermont,FL w" _-_ _- SW NORTH DAKOTAST -_-_-_ 4 -I-------�---�-- 'glr�°'),tr ry , , .;..."Y. kf wYIU n I �i " - ," < , orsrwimeyF•.q�A,nA+`ti'a 'aa h '1QQ�1 '.'4,41..— M' °7XwDY9tN r:J,AKt� OM INFORMATION LEGEND 60 IJ' 21 1' �, 44 i` f N f 41,- � *5 +s „0,,,MAW ROAD: al,rm s. -'; ROADWAY 1 I 1 I 2 �w. *t.,, t, '11', & I , q`T 11{ oPO1 AIA(L oaao v. .rocXAIA 5,111 A IL 1 ^,, q ,,p. j,, 4,�,, i i ^ M " 1^J,"' I '., wm 1a.a.v. ChM SPAR a 6.699"IL f ` I�, '1419 ''S 14``s 6' -r 4' 7' IA.k 4l ,Dn S 5 s ,,�hi �• m'or 7.t�V wn OROSS T17.1711 ST ,au.W. ® SLAMS 191 LOTS: 24.3 10.4 MI b .L�7 �,11il 11 a I 414 F� V t'Aikj)t ,1' r M 1 t1 Ur �I f ' �t MVO=Lon ss I 4 , td, toe• , yf,tJ ' ' �4 s ,lh . Jti1ll1 I rkhY � I `F 1 W It e.so7. fL - ' �I J " i r�' 01.11V1411 fW'k ,� 1 Z r ail' , 1,I ' 1'> 1r k'rr' l Q t. 4 k['‘J I'-,11+ oy y ft,14,1„.,�r p,o te Lip.A 6.744 NIA. l p sM1 �.f J ,r �'11 440 N,�, ,.! .I i x 4 ��1' 1( ��'ud{06p1.+ 4� 102' jk .b c111119 _ ll�v NrU(Ci L4'y�7�eciu. • N . �I„, 1 br iii ,,4.,,:4„za"d, j,,,, 3 4Z t 1 Jt '..'g ;' %I\� � ,'�{ry k�f �3� ar"'i��r{�7,n,�f 4 m -,c f�..F. �ho - .;„..?„/ !(i qi� L y {fi n{ ik* 1 17,Pl t,"r�^ l'41, i + iii '1I1,,..(. L 0 i t[ ,r ,g ref,�,, t, r 14�t I 1 /i\\' '(rb ,H �i 11 ,, het,}r° t1Mp if3/4'1 ,,. , ,,„„g 1,,k ,4 iry/,,,t,,.iris• ti1�i d Q���Je All .�I(�4JI\/'14 I 6- , r.�i.�{" L '•�i 14. f., '�! N,1+n y r ;; ,t • V"' �,. 1 ut7.,, i sq¢ ., 1 ,∎, ,�------- '1∎I e r• h 1J , NA V 1, Iry 0 4 SW TORLAND gsr'.11 ,�'"'', .ti—„ , .; "r i�t' 1u ' ?'7 i `1.7 '°.•' ac nPStiKK➢LLV!j1 dY �4 i'q ?�4 Yu 7' � f .A..14ti.c,_.. 18 •s w i ill �'. r� �v;'' . ' .I ;I• Lr y g f 3.i,, i y, - e.e1122.q.IL ., ;5 r. ,0 . 6.� ' � .' - �.a-rltr I ,a0. t;, ' w.We,,, -- ;�r' - —,..-7;11'./s 1 'r I t A VenturePropertles -- Y.''y 3 M 4f "F.• .._n'�. t X D O A I 0 A A t A D Ia 7.787.q.1L :1, ',i7�03 441141w ,1 ■f?` 1,4,E yew: . , I /. 1I, W- ''(.•s+n. snvoS� -11 • •nfc.aogw. til.7,ric: ,,G 0 3 V 'm r, '1,i r' ,,. = ,, ��� ' 4 �t �'� , alpha -/71\ 111 4°j1`�';/i 1113114.4'�,.':,', t.,, {% 7 1I • t, \I\;• \!r \I/'. \�/ill . _• - 0 �r ;tl ))1"I'1 •Y' �'.,� COMMUNITY \11\ P 11/ I'. 1�,�/< , l' k, DEVELOPMENT \I/r /I� \i �\`I\ -,,,,I\` ,I'1i t�yy 7 I 8 �1p 9 ..t1 i gt.9, �j•1, ,i 7 \\I' ,. 1 ,/i. \l// :� 6 5015.alL 6.008.q.fl. 6,002 4q,lfu , e`J 34, +;>7. / I I I I .. �,^�y ' `` (1) _ "751.'x, ��F{y,. /I\ //I`,\�I\ /�\\ -/\I\\ 'I\//\•\ I I 'IAA '-'. 'I t,j).X•itJ e 27.wo d+a^ ' SCALE ' 441VAiccjialigtil■ L.-L gl'T'C4 DAKOTA GLEN PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ,0..m IT • • t. EXHIBIT C LARGE EXHIBIT "TREE REMOVAL PLAN & CONCEPTUAL MITIGATION PLAN ' AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT CITY HALL r • • EXHIBIT D LARGE EXHIBIT "OPEN SPACE B PERSPECTIVE" AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT CITY HALL • • �...,` VentureProperties . • 4,- ".``1 " .._ i t... S t I N C O R P O R A T E D . _ ..,. 'TM'`S`ysg �'Creating . December 8 2005 ', ,f'Torrioruows Dennis Koellermeier • ,•,i Communities° 5=t` � 13125 SW Hall Blvd. _ 4ir �.;. I'., ;::,N= `ft Tigard, OR 97223 - ti.'i �r ; .. : Dakota Glen Planned Development(2005-000111)Park Land .... , : tip Dear Dennis: ti`•g 4 j---4' '= Venture Properties,Inc.is in the process of obtaining Planning Commission Y�'�•.,, .1,. :. Dakota Glen c' <s�; �: approval for Dakota Glen Planned Development 2005-000111.D 17>Tri '4':� Planned Development,as current proposed,includes two Open Space/Park tracts. ea k °' �` Attached for your review is a preliminary site plan for Dakota Glen which shows • • f3 z-_:?= r`�" -`'.4, these two tracts. It is my understanding that the City's Parks Department has now "-`, T�4V4. W: finalized the criteria and process for the City,through the City Council,to accept w • , i ,;� park land donations.The purpose of this letter is to offer to dedicate Tract"A"and zA 'sue--.3 4'., °-` ' z ;"- Tract`B"of Dakota Glen to the City of Tigard on behalf of the Parks Department 'r .- for park and open space purposes. `` ..`'�{• ;�.;x :`". If the Parks Department has any interest in these open a • ti e; :+ . ep Y P spate/park ce/park tracts,I would "`.i4``° be happy to meet with you to discuss this proposal further.Thank you for your • % 4' '/ . ui ,;n assistance with this matter and please call me if you have any questions.I can be 4 ,� �rzs� mss. xi;, ;., s,;� � reached at 503-387-7602.RI____________ = a c;- ;; : ; `'' Kelly Ritz • . ;s F.- ,Y:4 F4� President -• !ka .\ ,lV7 .ts tip. °�.'��4�+: ;!-4.-ir. ' • ..:'Ai 6 4 �r`"` ', CC. Daniel Plaza i :z='',: ''ir':: Tom Coffee - fi <:,;. A. :s:-f .�=; ; 4230 Galewood Street, Suite 100 • Lake Oswego,OR 97035 • 503.387.7600 • fax 503.387.7617 `''=:,.. °`.,:ti%°: iii, 241 NW Flagline Drive • Bend, OR 97701 • 541.385.0576 • fax 541.322.9744 • • December 16, 2005 LDC Design Group a Parati company Gary Pagenstecher, Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 • RE: Zone Change application Dear Mr. Pagenstecher: On behalf of the applicants, I am requesting that the Planning Commission continue the hearing on the proposed zoning map amendment until February 6, 2006. This will allow us more time to address transportation-related comments from the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). Our application was deemed complete by the staff on November 4, 2005, and scheduled for a hearing before the Planning Commission on December 19th. We received a letter from ODOT dated November 29th commenting on the proposed zone change, and requesting some additional traffic evaluation. We are confident that we can respond to ODOT's comments within the next few weeks and can provide the City with an addendum to the traffic analysis report by mid-January. This supplemental information can then be reviewed by City staff, and provided to the Planning Commission with the rest of our application materials and the staff report. Thank-you for your consideration of this request. If you have any additional questions regarding this request, please contact me. Sincer ly Ed Murphy, A CP 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro,OR 97124 P 503.858.4242 cc. Richard Akerman F 503.645.5500 E hillsboro @Idcdesign.com La Russo Concrete vaww.ldcdesign.com Kevin VandenBrink - Macadam Forbes Brian Bennett, OPUS Northwest, LLC Hillsboro,OR Tillamook,OR Vancouver,WA • Bellevue,WA Coeur d'Alene,ID Rocklin,CA Clermont,FL I • say-w..�.Y�-ir.��?�.Y"•,�.�,mv s�^,-�`-°..}-m..,�.s.. ��.°"° �� fi'=. .u- �..zf�,��-r- =�- xa �X*.f. -�-�,l�.'_ �r+F �s e a y , 4% { s itopii, TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ' FEBRUARY 6, 2006 7:00 p.m. City of Tigard TIGARD CIVIC CENTER— TOWN HALL ShapingA Better Community 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OREGON 97223 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. COMMUNICATIONS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS 4. APPROVE MINUTES ' 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2005-00009 UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE Continued from December 19, 2005 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval for a Zone Change from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park(I-P) for approximately six (6) acres located between SW 74th Avenue and Upper Boones Ferry Road. The subject property is currently developed with outdoor storage and older industrial buildings. The applicant envisions developing the property with an office use,which is not permitted in the Light Industrial zone. LOCATION: 15920 SW 74th Avenue and 16075 SW Upper Boones FerryRoad and adjoining properties. WCTM 2S113AB, Tax Lots 200/300/400/500; and 2S112DC, Tax Lots 1100/1200/1300. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development,warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants,personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts,e.g., noise, glare, odor,vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone.In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian- friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: CommunityDevelopment Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.520. 5.2 . SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2005-00007/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(PDR) 2005-00006/ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2005-00008/VARIANCE (VAR) 2005-00091 CORAL COMMONS REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval for a 1.6-acre NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLCO VENDOR OR SELLER: I. THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. CRY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2005 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING.APPLICATION: FILE NO.: ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2005-00009 FILE TITLE: UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE APPLICANT: LDC Design Group OWNER: Richard Ackerman, James Wathey Attn: Ed Murphy and LaRusso Concrete Co., Inc. 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive c/o Ackerman Hillsboro, OR 97124 919 West Point Road Lake Oswego, OR 97034 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval for a Zone Change from Light IndLstrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) for approximately six (6) acres located between SW 74 Avenue and Upper Boones Ferry Road. The subject property is currently developed with outdoor storage and older industrial buildings. The applicant envisions developing the property with an office use, which is not permitted in the Light Industrial zone. LOCATION: . 15920 SW 74th Avenue and 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and adjoining properties. WCTM 2S113AB, Tax Lots 200/300/400/500;and 2S112DC, Tax Lots 1100/1200/1300. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial: uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if PROPOSED any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, lare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.530. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER. 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 2438 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT OITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPAND ACTION, MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT . THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE OR DOCUMENTS LESS THAN 7 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE, THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY MAY ALLOW A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING, SUBJECT TO ORS 215.428 OR 227.178. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL BE BASED UPON THE CRITERIA LISTED OR OTHER CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH THE PERSON BELIEVES TO APPLY TO THE DECISION. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST, ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. - ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25 ) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT.THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25 ) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER GARY PAGENSTECHER AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. ,-I ( \ j/ NCIIV of TIGARD • PRIA MOIETY y� 1 ZON2005-00009 ` a�5�� 1 74TH AVENUE • • .` � ZONE CHANGE ' _ ��o � �� c,c t. s.N \ . 4 04,E•&N:,/,,„ \ sat, aM6fl' Itrit11k1; 0 + _ . ,eo NO s. t-s ip w r-mI..I •00 Rol 1 I . . * IIII OG z vi. 3 LL;ilr. �" rn City of Tigard o...r..arr. ......0.....w worm my wa oa nm gEQuEsr liR COMI%I€NYS • MEMORANDUM //44118# ,;.'+I,i� TO: Gary Pagenstecher --«i °=__., FROM: Long Range Planning RE: (ZON) 2005-00009 Upper Boones Ferry Road Zone Change DATE: December 7, 2005 The applicants request a zone change for 6 parcels totaling 6 acres which are zoned I-L (Light Industrial.) The applicants wish to change the zoning designation to I-P (Industrial Park.) The comprehensive plan designation would remain Light Industrial. Although plans have not been finalized, the applicants state the eventual project would be an office park of approximately 127,000 sq. ft. Existing conditions: The site is zoned I-L, but is surrounded on three sides by properties zoned I-P. The site is located less than half a mile from the Bridgeport Village retail and office development. The site is near on and off ramps to 1-5, and lies near the intersection of two arterials, SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and SW 72nd Avenue. A third arterial, SW Durham Road is only one property away to the southwest. A railway lines runs along the site to the west. Fanno Creek Park lies across SW 74th Ave, to the west. According to the Washington County Assessor, the sum of the land values for the six parcels is $2,230,070. Three of the parcels have structures present and three are vacant. The three structures have a total value of $801,140. For these three parcels the building value as a percent of total value is .45, indicating the parcels are somewhat underutilized. Zoning History The site, currently zoned I-L, had the old industrial zoning designation M-3. In 1983, this zoning designation was replaced by two zones, I-L and I-P. In the 1980's several nearby properties were rezoned to I-P, notably the nearby PacTrust business park. A review of City records reveals that since 1991 there have been four applications to change zones from Light Industrial to Industrial Park. Two applications, from 1991 and 1994 lapsed without action. In 1994 an 8.96 acre area was re-zoned I-P. The most recent approval was in 2002, for an application to allow an indoor entertainment facility (Sy-Kart Indoor Racing Center.) From 1990-1994 there were at least 4 cases of rezoning I-P and I-L land to C-G throughout the city. • • It appears from a cursory review of zoning maps that additional parcels were rezoned to I-P between 1997 and 1999, but the information could not be found in the records. The zone changes may have been attached to other types of cases. Time constraints did not allow further investigation. Zoning Discussion: The most important difference between I-P and I-L zones is in allowable uses. The Industrial Park zone allows office uses outright and up to 20% square footage of retail uses, while the Light Industrial zone forbids these uses. This project is planned to be primarily office with potential retail uses. The Tigard Development Code states that "the I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting." It is not stated whether the zoning intended "appropriate locations" for this combination of uses to be on one site, or throughout the district. There is a question of whether this proposed zone change would encourage the intended mix of uses, or whether it would accelerate the conversion of the district from primarily industrial uses to primarily office. The development standards of I-P and I-L are similar in terms of maximum site coverages, height, etc (see Table 1.) Table 1: Development Standards Comparison Chart I-L I-P MUE (Tigard Triangle) Max Height 45 ft. 45 ft. 45 ft. Max. Site Coverage 85% 75%(80%) 85% Min. Landscaping 15% 25% (20%) 15% Max FAR - - .4 The Industrial Zone development standards do not necessarily support the combination of uses that are intended. This can be seen by the fact that exclusively office projects • are approvable in the I-P zone. As a point of comparison, Tigard's Triangle overlay zone was intended to support a mix of office and retail uses. If this project was proposed for the Tigard Triangle, the maximum allowable FAR would be .4, and additional design guidelines would have to be met. With the I-P zone standards, the applicants preliminarily propose a project with a square footage of 127,000, (an FAR of .48.) Current Industrial Buildable Lands Approximately 73 acres of land zoned I-L and I-P were identified in the Tigard 2004 buildable lands inventory (See Map 1). This application would not affect this supply, as it is a redevelopment project. However the approval of zone changes like this could encourage more requests for zone changes. • • Discussion: A review of recent land use applications does not reveal a trend of requests for zone changes from I-L to I-P. However, the applicants' request could be a sign the real estate market is changing. Tigard's industrial land is concentrated along 1-5 and Highway 217. This transportation access also makes it attractive to office and commercial development. The site of the proposed zone change and the surrounding area are especially visible and accessible to auto traffic. According to a June 2005 Westside Economic Alliance presentation, the 1-5 Office Market in general is strong due to: -The proximity to top mangers homes . -Excellent transportation access. -The lack of the Multnomah County business tax and income tax surcharge. The same presentation also detailed the I-5 South submarket, which this site is close to (the boundaries and names of real estate submarkets differ depending on.the source used.) The weaknesses of the sub-market are its limited office inventory and its industrial/warehouse character. The presenters forecasted that this market would have new office development, declining vacancy rate, and increasing rental rates. The nearby Kruse Way office/commercial market is very tight, with vacancy rates of 4%, compared to a regionwide average of 11.7%. According to a commercial real estate broker, this area might be subject to a spillover effect from the success of the Kruse Way developments. Additionally, the nearby Bridgeport Village development is considered an amenity for Class A office space. A possible example of this market change is the Durham Plaza, a Class A Office development under construction on Upper Boones Ferry Road (in nearby Tualatin, .3 miles south of the applicant's site.) (Oregonian 6/23/05) Conclusions/Questions While the intent of the I-P and I-L zones are compatible, do the I-P development standards provide guidance to encourage the combination of uses that are desired in the zone? If the current standards allow the I-P district to evolve into primarily office development will this negatively impact industrial uses? There appears to be developing market pressures that could encourage future office park proposals. Does the fact that more FAR is potentially obtainable under I-P zoning than in other zones make I-P parcels more attractive to further office park projects? r • MEMORANDUM TO: Gary Pagenstecher FROM: Long Range Planning RE: (ZON) 2005-00009 Upper Boones Ferry Road Zone Change DATE: December 9, 2005 Addendum: Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan compliance Background In 2004 Metro revised Title 4 (Industrial and Other Employment Areas) of the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan. While the City of Tigard is in the process of bringing its code in compliance with the Metro Functional Plan, proposed development in Metro-identified Industrial and Other Employment Areas must be accordance with the Plan. According the Map of Industrial and Other Employment Areas (Exhibit C,) the parcels in the proposed zone change case ((ZON) 2005-00009) are classified as Employment Land. Analysis According to Title 4, 3.07.440, Protection of Employment Areas, local governments "shall limit new and expanded commercial retail uses to those appropriate in type and size to serve the needs of businesses, employees, and residents of Employment Areas." The relevant subsections in the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan are: 1) 3.07.440.B: "Except as provided in subsections C, D and E, a city or county shall not approve a commercial retail use in an Employment Area with more than 60,000 square feet of gross leasable area in a single building, or commercial retail uses with a total of more than 60,000 square feet of retail sales area on a single.lot or parcel, or on contiguous lots or parcels, including those separated only by transportation right-of- way." Analysis: Retail commercial uses are Restricted uses in Tigard's I-P Zone. Commercial retail uses are limited to 20% of the entire square footage within a development complex and these uses cannot exceed 60,000 square feet of gross leasable area per building or • business. The proposed zone change is to I-P, whose requirements are in compliance with this subsection. 2) 3.07.440 C. "A city or county whose zoning ordinance applies to an Employment Area and is listed on Table 3.07-4 may continue to authorize commercial retail uses with more than 60,000 square feet of gross leasable area in that zone if the ordinance authorized those uses on January 1, 2003." Analysis: Table 3.07-4 lists two zones for Tigard in this category. General Commercial and Commercial Professional. The proposed zone change is from Light Industrial to Industrial Park, so this section is not applicable. 3) 3.07.440 D. "A city or county whose zoning ordinance applies to an Employment Area and is not listed on Table 3.07-4 may continue to authorize commercial retail uses with more than 60,000 square feet of gross leasable area in that zone if: 1. The ordinance authorized those uses on January 1, 2003; 2. Transportation facilities adequate to serve the commercial retail uses will be in place at the time the uses begin operation; and 3. The comprehensive plan provides for transportation facilities adequate to serve other uses planned for the Employment Area over the planning period." 4) 3.07.440 E. "A city or county may authorize new commercial retail uses with more than 60,000 square feet of gross leasable area in Employment Areas if the uses: 1. Generate no more than a 25 percent increase in site generated vehicle trips above permitted non-industrial uses; and 2. Meet the Maximum Permitted Parking— Zone A requirements set forth in Table 3.07-2 of Title 2 of the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan." Analysis of 3 and 4: Retail commercial uses are Restricted uses in Tigard's I-P Zone. Commercial retail uses are limited to 20% of the entire square footage within a development complex and these uses cannot exceed 60,000 square feet of gross leasable area per building or business. These sections are not applicable because the I-P zone does not allow retail uses greater than 60,000 square feet. The proposed zone change of the parcels to I-P would result in a development that appears to be consistent with the Metro requirements. • -4)�. Iregori Oregon Department of Transportation N Yt1jTIV'y:iz - .. ... .. �_ �_- ODOT Region 1 = : •.��: 7-hecidore R.Kulongoski,Governor 123 NW Flanders St 59 Portland,OR 97209-4037 Telephone(503)731-8200 FAX(503)731-8259 File code: PLA9 2A-1 ODOT Case No:2322 February 23, 2006 City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Attn: Gary Pagenstecher, Associate Planner Re: ZON2005-00009: Upper Boones Ferry Zone Change Durham Rd/SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd Intersection and Upper Boones Ferry Rd/I-5 Interchange Dear Mr. Pagenstecher, We have reviewed the applicant's proposal to rezone six acres from light industrial (l-L) to industrial park (I-P). The site is in the vicinity of the Upper Boones Ferry Rd/I-5 interchange and the Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Durham Rd intersection. ODOT has jurisdiction of these State highway facilities and an interest in assuring that the proposed zone change is consistent with the identified function, capacity and performance standard of this facility. According to the 1999 Oregon Highway Plan (OHP), I-5 is classified as an Interstate highway facility and Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Durham Rd is classified as a District highway facility. ODOT has jurisdiction over the SW and NW legs of the Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Durham Rd intersection. The performance standard for these facilities is 0.99 volume to capacity (v/c) ratio. For zone changes and comprehensive plan amendments local governments must make findings that the proposed amendment complies with the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) OAR 660- 012-0060. There must be substantial evidence in the record to either make the finding of"no significant effect" on the transportation system, or if there is a significant effect assurance that the allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity, and performance standard of the transportation facility as measured at the end of the planning period identified in the City's Transportation System Plan or for state highways apply the highway mobility standard (volume-to-capacity ratio) identified in the Oregon Highway Plan over a planning horizon of the adopted local transportation system plan or 15 years from the proposed date of amendment adoption, whichever is greater (OHP Action 1F2). Oregon Highway Plan (OHP) Action 1 F6 applies to situations where the highway facility is operating above the OHP mobility standard and transportation improvements are not planned within the planning horizon to bring performance to standard, the performance standard is to avoid further degradation. If the proposed zone change or comprehensive plan amendment increases the volume-to-capacity ratio further, it will significantly affect the facility. Findings for the 1-5 southbound ramp terminus on Upper Boones Ferry Rd intersection ODOT Comments 2/24/6 2 ODOT Region 1 Traffic has reviewed the traffic impact study (TIS) prepared by Kittelson and Assoc January 18th, 2006 for impacts to the 1-5 southbound ramp terminus on Upper Boones Ferry Rd. In the planning horizon year 2021 the v/c with the existing zoning at the intersection will be 1.09 and with the proposed zoning will be 1.10 both of which exceed the OHP maximum v/c of 0.99. As per OHP action 1 F6, with this increase in the v/c ratio means that the proposed zone change will significantly effect the 1-5 southbound ramp terminus/Upper Boones Ferry Rd intersection. To mitigate for the significant effect, Kittelson proposes to optimize the signal timing to bring the v/c back to the current zoning level. Optimizing the signal timing is not adequate mitigation because ODOT relies on signal timing to maintain optimal intersection function for vehicles getting off the interstate and may adjust as necessary when conditions change. Based on ODOT's analysis, an eastbound right turn lane is warranted at the intersection and would improve the operation of the intersection. Because the proposed zone change only increases the v/c ratio slightly from 1.09 to 1.10, ODOT recommends that the City require the applicant to contribute their "proportionate share" towards the installation of an eastbound right turn lane. ODOT requests the City collect money towards this improvement on our behalf. Recommended Condition of Approval The applicant shall contribute to the City their "proportionate share" of the eastbound right turn lane at the 1-5 southbound ramp terminal/Upper Boones Ferry Rd intersection. Proportionate Share= s/(f-e) + s)*100 = 45/((3380-2650) + 45)*100 = 5.81% s = 2021 Total PM Peak Hour Intersection Trips w/ Proposed Zoning (TIS figure 4) — 2021 Total PM Peak Hour Intersection Traffic w/ Current Zoning (TIS figure 3) = 45 (f-e) = background traffic growth f= 2021 Total PM Peak Hour Intersection Trips w/ Current Zoning (TIS figure 3) = 3380 e=2006 Total PM Peak Hour Intersection Trips w/ Current Zoning (figure 1) = 2650 Additional Comments The ODOT Rail Division has reviewed the TIS for impacts of the proposed zone change on the public rail crossing on Durham Rd. There is an existing queuing problem across the rail tracks. City staff has indicated that the City will be making a "reasonably likely" determination for funding of the identified widening of Durham Rd to 5 lanes in the City's TSP. The widening of the rail road crossing will require a Rail Order be obtained from the ODOT Rail Division. As part of the Rail Order, the safety of the crossing will need to be evaluated and upgraded as necessary to address crossing safety. ODOT appreciates the City's willingness to work together to collect funds to address the capacity constraints at the 1-5 southbound ramp terminal intersection. We look forward to working with the City to develop a reasonable travel shed and proportionate share ODOT Log No:2322 ODOT Comments 2/24/6 3 formula for collecting money towards the eastbound right turn lane from future proposed developments under existing zoning to improve the capacity at the intersection. Thanks for coordinating with ODOT. Jason Grassman PE, provided the technical review of the TIS. Please contact Mr. Grassman at 503-731-8221 if you have any questions regarding the TIS findings or the "proportionate share" formula. I can be reached at 503-731-8258. Sincerely, Marah Danielson Development Review Planner C: Jason Grassman, Marty Jensvold, Lainie Smith, ODOT Region 1 ODOT Log No:2322 M N /ftfigik " Oregon Oregon Department of Transportation ODOT Region 1 '•s °'' '-' Theodore R.Kulongoski,Governor 123 NW Flanders St Portland,OR 97209-4037 Telephone(503)731-8200 FAX (503)731-8259 File code: PLA9 2A-1 ODOT Case No:2322 November 29, 2005 City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Attn: Gary Pagenstecher, Associate Planner Re: ZON2005-00009: Upper Boones Ferry Zone Change Durham Rd/SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd Intersection and Upper Boones Ferry Rd/I-5 Interchange Dear Mr. Pagenstecher, We have reviewed the applicant's proposal to rezone six acres from light industrial (I-L) to industrial park (I-P). The site is in the vicinity of the Upper Boones Ferry Rd/I-5 interchange and the Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Durham Rd intersection. ODOT has jurisdiction of these State highway facilities and an interest in assuring that the proposed zone change is consistent with the identified function, capacity and performance standard of this facility. According to the 1999 Oregon Highway Plan (OHP), I-5 is classified as an Interstate highway facility and Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Durham Rd is classified as a District highway facility. ODOT has jurisdiction over the SW and NW legs of the Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Durham Rd intersection. The performance standard for these facilities is 0.99 volume to capacity (v/c) ratio. The ODOT Rail Division has jurisdiction over public rail crossings. The proposed rezone and site development may impact the public rail crossing at Durham Rd. ODOT received a copy of the traffic impact analysis prepared by Kittelson and Associates for the proposed rezone the afternoon of Tuesday, November 22nd before the Thanksgiving holiday. Unfortunately, ODOT was not contacted by Kittelson at the time of the study scoping and was given a short time to review and comment. A copy of the analysis is being routed to the Rail Division for review and comment. This letter constitutes ODOT Planning and Traffic comments. ODOT recommends the City require the applicant to separate the analysis for the zone change from the analysis for the site design review as the analysis requirements and review criteria are different. Rezone Comments For zone changes and comprehensive plan amendments local governments must make findings that the proposed amendment complies with the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) OAR 660-012-0060. There must be substantial evidence in the record to either make the finding of"no significant effect" on the transportation system, or if there is a significant effect assurance that the allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity, and performance standard of the transportation facility as measured at the end of the planning period identified in the City's Transportation System Plan or for state highways apply the highway mobility standard (volume-to-capacity ratio) identified in the Oregon Highway Plan over a planning horizon of the adopted local transportation system plan or 15 years from the proposed date of amendment adoption, whichever is greater(OHP Action 1F2). Tigard,City of;ZON2005-00009 Upper Boones Ferry Zone Change ODOT RESPONSE PP ry 9 2 In order to determine whether or not there is a significant effect on the State facilities with the proposed rezone from light industrial to industrial park, ODOT requests a comparison analysis be done for the existing year and the future 2020 year with and without the rezone for the following intersections (the analysis should be based on the reasonable worst case build out under each zone): • Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Sequoia Parkway (580 ft from the interchange ramp terminal) • I-5/Upper Boones Ferry Rd ramp terminal on the west side • Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Durham Rd The analysis can rely on existing and planned transportation improvements in which a funding mechanism is in place including but not limited to projects identified in: • State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), • local/county capital improvement plans (CIP), • financially constrained Regional Transportation System Plan (RTP) • Washington County Major Streets Transportation Improvement Program MSTIP. (OAR 660- 012-0060) In situations where the highway facility is operating above the OHP mobility standard and transportation improvements are not planned within the planning horizon to bring performance to standard, the performance standard is to avoid further degradation. If the proposed zone change or comprehensive plan amendment increases the volume-to-capacity ratio further, it will significantly affect the facility (OHP Action 1F6). Site Design Review Comments Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Durham Rd Intersection: ODOT supports the mitigation identified for the Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Durham intersection. The applicant proposes that the TIF from the development of the site be contributed towards improvements at the Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Durham Rd intersection. "The future project should add another southbound travel lane on SW upper Boones Ferry Rd, continuing through the intersection, with an appropriate design length and taper to merge southbound traffic back into one travel lane. Additionally, an exclusive southbound right turn lane should be maintained with an added right turn overlap signal phase (p. 36 Kittelson Report." ODOT would like clarification as to how the applicant proposes to meet City code requirements with regards to impacts at the Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Durham Rd intersection at the time of development. Although the improvements may be TIF creditable, it is our understanding that if the development of the site triggers the warrant for these improvements that the City code requires that the applicant construct the improvements. If the applicant's TIF fees go towards an improvement at the intersection, the intersection project needs to be on the TIF project list to ensure that it will be constructed. Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Sequoia Parkway Intersections: The applicant has performed a 2006 queuing analysis for three of the study intersections for the proposed zoning. ODOT requests the City require the applicant to perform a 2006 queuing analysis of the Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Sequoia Parkway intersection to identify whether or not there may be backups on the 1-5 ramp. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (503) 731-8258. Tim Wilson, ODOT Senior Planner will be coordinating any further review of the proposed rezone. Mr. Wilson can be reached at 503-731-8534. Sincerely, Marah Danielson Development Review Planner ODOT Log No:2322 • r Tigard, City of;ZON2005-00009, UpperBoones Ferry Zone Change ODOT RESPONSE 3 C: Jason Grassman, Marty Jensvold, Tim Wilson, Lainie Smith, ODOT Region 1 ODOT Log No:2322 12/09/2005 11:44 FAX 5035981960 CITY OF TIGARD IJ001 s** TX REPORT **s *************sax****** TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO 0824 CONNECTION TEL 5036455500 SUBADDRESS CONNECTION ID ST. TIME 12/09 11:43 USAGE T 01'14 PGS. SENT 4 RESULT OK • Fax Transmittal Cover Sheet • Building Division C" o Ti and • Date a/r/off Number of pages including cover sheet y To; � fyl 17/'Pli From: d g Co: LOG /SPSi Co: City of Tigard, B ildinq Division Fax#: Fax#: 503-59$1960 Ph #: Ph #: 503-639=4171, Ext. 2431a 1 SUBJECT: 7 of-tit2 R.,e-rje MESSAGE: hea7 ene-L ! e‘ka 1,, 1 II "H#L4 L7a," 694,Of Fax Transmittal Cover Sheet Building Division City of Tigard Date /9/Cc- N of pages including cover sheet To: P From: ✓c Co: '- PSts Co: City of Tigard, B ilding Division Fax#: c'o3- • Fax#: 503-598-1960 Ph #: Ph #: 503-639-4171, Ext. 243'19 SUBJECT: 7'/ MESSAGE: riacJo 01)6 r m, by d w y-717-) p o s-6,4) r CS h 424 is\dsts\forms\FaxTransmittalToCopy.dot 10/11/05 • R QUEST FOR COMMENTS A CITY OF TIIGARD Community Development Shaping 'Better Community DATE: November 9,2005 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer NFL r?L FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division § 2A935 STAFF CONTACT: Gary Pagenstecher,Associate Planner(x24341 Phone: (5031 639-4171/Fax: (5031684-1297 QITtYt F jj ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2005-00009 > UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval for a Zone Change from LAght Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) for approximately six (6) acres located between SW 74 Avenue and Upper Boones Ferry Road. The subject property is currently developed with outdoor storage and older industrial buildings. The applicant envisions developing the property.with an office use, which is not permitted in the Light Industrial zone. LOCATION: 15920 SW 74 Avenue and 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and adjoining properties. WCTM 2S113AB, Tax Lots 300/400/500; and 2S112DC, Tax Lots 1100/1200/1300. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial. Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.520. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 28, 2005. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact . of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: • c1.V45‘c -116-a.5t.1 Name& Phone#of Person(s) Commenting: • At RI QUEST FOR COMMENTS ''`O 'liA CITY F TIGARD Community lnevethpment Shaping A Better Community DATE: November 9,2005 TO: Rob Murchison,Public Works Project Engineer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Gary Pagenstecher,Associate Planner(x2434) Phone: 15031 639-4171/Fax: (503)684-7297 ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2005-00009 > UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE < REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval for a Zone Change from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) for approximately six (6) acres located between SW 74r Avenue and Upper Boones Ferry Road. The subject property is currently developed with outdoor storage and older industrial buildings. The applicant envisions developing the property with an office use, which is not permitted in the Light Industrial zone. LOCATION: 15920 SW 74m Avenue and 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and adjoining properties. WCTM 2S113AB, Tax Lots 300/400/500; and 2S112DC, Tax Lots 1100/1200/1300. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.520. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 28, 2005. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: {/ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact . of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name 8/Phony#of P,CL X om j)?? • • ° ,y^ REQUEST FOR COMMENTS - CITY OFTIGARD Community DeveCopment Shaping A(Better Community DATE: November 9, 2005 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Gary Pagenstecher, Associate Planner (x2434) Phone: (503) 639-4171/Fax: (503) 684-7297 ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2005-00009 > UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE Q REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval for a Zone Change from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) for approximately six (6) acres located between SW 74ur Avenue and Upper Boones Ferry Road. The subject property is currently developed with outdoor storage and older industrial buildings. The applicant envisions developing the property. with an office use, which is not permitted in the light Industrial zone. LOCATION: 15920 SW 74 Avenue and 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and adjoining properties. WCTM 2S113AB, Tax Lots 300/400/500; and 2S112DC, Tax Lots 1100/1200/1300. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.520. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 28, 2005. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact . of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name&Phone#of Person(s) Commenting: • CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICAT4111 LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY D•OPMENT APPLICATIONS iy FILE NOS.: ZOZA,,r- 0450O 9 FILE NAME: 7 Z �"C' , CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS i 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES OF AREA: ['Central :Mast NiSouth ['West CITY OFFICES s` ;TONG RANGE PLANNING/Barbara Shields,Planning Mgr. _COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT/Planning-Engineering Techs. POLICE DEPTJJim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official L/ENGINEERING DEPTJKim McMillan,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer_PUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester _STY ADMINISTRATION'Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder JePUBLIC WORKS/Rob Murchison,Project Engineer PLANNER—POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM-10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING! SPECIAL DISTRICTS _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*_ TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* _ CLEANWATER SERVICES* Planning Manager. Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS 6 CITY OF BEAVERTON• TY OF TUALATIN* _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager 3406 Cherry Avenue NE Melinda Wood(WLUN Form Required) _ Steven Sparks,Dev.Svcs.Manager 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue Salem,OR 97303 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING* _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND° 550 Capitol Street NE CITY OF DURHAM* 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ Bob Knight,Data Resource Center(ZCA) _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. Kathryn Harris(Maps s CWS Letter Only) _ Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA/ZOA) Larry French(Comp.Plan Amendments Only) Routing CENWP-OP-G _CITY OF KING CITY* Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager > D.Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powedmes in Area) _OR.DEPT OF AVIATION(Monopole Towers) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,Planning 155 N.First Avenue CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO Routing TTRC–Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE dilteuite 350, MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 illsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Steve Conway(General Apps.) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 $ _Gregg Leion(CPA) _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * _Brent Curtis(CPA) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) iG°rant Robinson,Development Review Coordinator _Doria Mateja(ZCA)Ms 14 Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator _Carl Torland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) _Sr.Cartographer ICPA2CAoMS14 1900 SW 4th Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Jim Nims,Surveyor acA)Ms 1s Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 —WA.CO.CONSOL.COMM.AGNCY _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A* _ODOT,RAIL DIVISION — STATE HISTORIC Dave Austin(WCCCA)"911"(Monopole Towers) Sam Hunaidi,Assistant District Manager (Notify if ODOT R/R-Hwy.Crossing is Only Access to land) . PRESERVATION OFFICE PO Box 6375 6000 SW Raab Road Dave Lanning,sr.Crossing Safety Specialist (Notify if Property Has HD Overlay) Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221 555-13th Street, NE,Suite 3 1115 Commercial Street, NE Salem,OR 97301-4179 Salem,OR 97301-1012 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES Z g4ORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W.10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 14OUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _COMCAST CABLE CORP. _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations only) Randy Bice (Sm Mapfix Area ) (If Project is Wdhin%Mile of a Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 —PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC —NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY —VERIZON _QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Ken Gutierrez,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. David Bryant,Engineering Florence Mott,Eng.ROW Mgr. 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue OR 030533/PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd, Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _COMCAST CABLE CORP. _COMCAST CABLE COMMUNIC. Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics Alex Silantiev(See Maprer Ama Cmeaa) Diana Carpenter(Apps E of HaIVN.ofuHNQ 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg. 12 10831 SW Cascade Avenue Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Tigard,OR 97223-4203 * INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). - h:\patty\masters\Request For Comments Notification List.doc (UPDATED: 16-Aug-05) (Also update:is\curpin\setup\labels\annexation_utilities and franchises.doc when updating this document) ?LANWI4 & 5aCTA R /'44TER IA LS F • FIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OFTIGARD Community rDevetopment Shaping Getter Community I, rPatriciaL.Lunsforcd being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialstfor the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Belau) © NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: 10N2005-00009/UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) HEARING BODY: HEARING DATE: ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director El Tigard Hearings Officer ® Tigard Planning Commission (3/6/2006) El Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on March 21,2006,and deposited in the United States Mail on March 21,2006, postage prepaid. / (Person that ' epared Noti - STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) -� Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of , 2006. OFFICIAL SEAL SUE ROSS ti J NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON MAR LW O COMMISSION 1 i yC0MM1sloN EXPIRES DEC.1 2077 I Co sion Expires: l� 1 120 DAYS =5/18/2006(Includ47-day extension) • EXHIBIT DATE OF FILING: 3/20/2006 114 41 CITY OF TIGARD TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO. 2006-02 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Case Number: ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2005-00009 Case Name: UPPER BOONE S FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE Name of Owner. Richard Ackerman,James Wathey and LaRusso Concrete Co.,Inc. Name of Applicant: -: LDCDesign Group Attn:Ed Murphy . ' Address of Applicant: 20085 NW Tanasboume Drive Hillsboro,OR 97124 Address of Property: 15920 SW 74th Avenue and 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd.&adjoining properties Tax Map/Lot Nos.: Washington County Tax Assessor's Map No.2S113AB,Tax Lots 200/300/400/500 and 2S112DC,Tax Lots 1100/1200/1300. A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A ZONE CHANGE. THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICANTS PLANS, NARRATIVE, MATERIALS, COMMENTS OF REVIEWING AGENCIES, THE PLANNING DIVISION'S STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION DESCRIBED,IN FURTHER DETAIL IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 6, 2006 TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY REGARDING THIS APPLICATION. THIS DECISION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. Request: > The applicant is requesting approval for a Zone Change from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) for approximately six (6) acres located between SW 74th Avenue and Upper Booties Ferry Road. The subject property is currently developed with outdoor storage and older industrial buildings. The applicant envisions developing the property with an office use, which is not permitted in the Light Industrial zone. Current Zoning Designation: I-L: Light Industrial District. Approved Zoning Designation: I-P: Industrial Park District. Applicable Review Criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18390 and 18.530; and Comprehensive Plan Policies 2,3,4,5,7,8,9 and 12. Action: > ❑ Approval as Requested © Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to: © Owners of Record Within the Required Distance © Affected Government Agencies © The Affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator © The Applicants and Owners The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obtained from the Planning Division/Community Development Department at the City of Tigard City Hall. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MARCH 21, 2006 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON APRIL 5, 2006 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten(10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON APRIL 4, 2006. Questions: If you have any questions,please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. r • III II NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO. 2006-02 PC BY THE PLANNING:COMMISSION TIGARD FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD OREGON A FINAL ORDER APPROVING A LAND.USE APPLICATION FOR A ZONE CHANGE. .THE COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON THIS APPLICATION ON MARCH 6, 2006. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS BASED THEIR DECISION ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. (Includes a 77-day extension) 120 DAYS =5/18/2006 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NO.: Zone Change (ZON) ZON2005-00009 FILE NAME: UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD CHANGE PROPOSAL: The applicant requests a zone change from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (Lip) for approximately 6 acres located between SW 74th Avenue and Upper Boones Ferry Road. The subject roperty is currently developed with outdoor storage and older industrial buildings. Te applicant envisions developing the property with an office use,which is not permitted in the Light Industrial zone. APPLICANT: Ed Murphy OWNERS: Richard Ackerman,James Wathey LDC Design Group and LaRusso Concrete Co.,Inc. 20085 NW Tanasbourne Dr. c/o Ackerman Hillsboro,OR 97124 919 West Point Road Lake Oswego, OR 97034 LOCATION: 16075 SW_�Upp er Boones Ferry Road and 15920 SW 74th Avenue and adjoining properties;W 2S113AB, Tax Lots 200, 300, 400,and 500; 2S112DC,Tax Lots 1100, 1200, and 1300. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial-service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants,personal services and fitness centers,in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the .I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. Among other uses,indoor entertainment is allowed. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.530; and Comprehensive Plan-PPolicies 2,3,4,5,T, 8,9 and 12. UPPERBOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE(ZON2005-00009) PAGE 1 OF 11 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2006-02 PC • • SECTION II. PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION The Planning Commission finds that the proposed Zone Change will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City and meets the Approval Standards as outlined in this Final Order. Therefore the Commission APPROVES the Zone Change subject to the following Conditions of Approval and Findings within this Final Order. SECTION III. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The applicant shall contribute to the City their "proportionate share" at time of final building inspection of the eastbound right turn lane at the 1-5 southbound ramp terminal/Upper Boones Ferry Rd intersection. Proportionate Share=s/(f-e) + 100 =45/((3380-2650) +45)'''100 = 5.81% See attached letter from ODOT for details of how the proportionate share was calculated. 2. The applicant shall contribute to the City their "proportionate share" at time of final building inspection of the improvement costs for providing a second southbound through lane and a southbound right-turn lane at the Durham Road/Upper Boones Ferry Road intersection. The City Engineer will determine the proportionate share. SECTION IV. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History In the late 1970's the subject 6-acre property was zoned M-3 Industrial. In 1983 the M-3 zone was replaced by the. I-P (Industrial Park) and I-L (Light industrial) zones with the subject property being designated I-L. The properties are currently used for office and industrial uses, particularly for land intensive outdoor storage of materials and equipment. There are a few older, single-story buildings on the site with some landscaping along Upper Boones Ferry Road. Vicinity Information The site is located within a large industrial/commercial area that borders 1-5 and extends from Highway 217 to Bridgeport Road and beyond. The subject property is bordered on the north east,west and most of the south sides by I-P zoning. Approximately 140 feet of the entire perimeter of the site is adjacent.to properties zoned I-L (across Upper Boones Ferry Road). Adjacent uses include a 3-story Class `A' office building, a lumber yard,single-level industrial/office buildings, and a railroad. Site Information and Proposal Description The applicant is requesting approval to change the existing zone from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I P) in order to build a class A'office building,which is an allowed use in the I-P zone and not allowed within the I-L zone. The I-P zone still allows for light-industrial uses, however, it also allows for a wider range of uses,making the property more marketable and likely to increase opportunities for a positive economic impact. A pre-application conference held by the applicant for the proposed office use on the subject property indicated that a 3-story,approximately 127,000 square foot office building is anticipated for the subject site. SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.380 Section 18.380.030.A states that the Commission shall decide zone change applications which do not involve comprehensive plan map amendments. Section 18.380.030.B states that a recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application for a quasi-judicial amendment shall be based on all of the following standards: UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE ANGE(ZON2005-00009) PAGE 2 OF 11 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2006-02 PC • Section 18.380.030.B.1 Demonstration of compliance with all applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designations. The Comprehensive Plan treats the I-L and I-P zoning districts, which together comprise the Light Industrial Comprehensive Plan Designation, interchangeably. The applicable Comprehensive Plan Polices are as follows: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES 1. GENERAL POLICIES Lila The city shall ensure that this comprehensive plan and all future legislative changes are consistent with the statewide planning goals adopted by the Land Conservation and Development Commission, the Regional Plan adopted by the Metropolitan Service District; Implementation Strategies 1. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map and the Official Zoning District map will reflect the plan policies and apply land use categories in the following manner. j. Light Industrial - Refers to areas deemed appropriate for industrial activities which include manufacturing, processing, assembling, packaging or treatment of products from previously prepared materials and which are devoid of nuisance factors that would adversely affect other properties. The appropriate zoning districts are Light Industrial (I-L) and Industrial Park (I-P) which also permit offices and related uses. The proposed zone charge from I-L to I-P complies with the Comprehensive Map designation of "Light Industrial" because the I-P zone is one of the two industrial zoning districts that implement the Light Industrial Comprehensive Plan Designation. The proposed zone changed would not amend the comprehensive plan and is not a legislative change. However, the land use categories are defined in this section and have been included for clarity. 2. CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT: 2.1.1 The City shall maintain an ongoing citizen involvement program and shall assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process. The applicant's representative sent out notices to surrounding property .owners and neighborhood representatives, posted a sign on the property, and held a neighborhood meeting on September 7, 2005 in accordance with the City of Tigard s neighborhood meeting notification process. According to the minutes of the neighborhood meeting, four property owners were in attendance. Those in attendance discussed the proposed access to the site and the impacts that the proposed office use would have on the area. No objections were given to the proposed zone change. In addition, the City has mailed notice of the Planning Commission hearing to property owners within 500 feet of the subject site, interested citizens, and agencies, and published notice of the hearing pursuant to TDC 18.390.050 for Type III Procedures. FINDING: With these public involvement provisions and the applicant's documented participation, the proposed zone change is consistent with applicable Citizen Involvement policies. 3. NATURAL FEATURES AND OPEN SPACE: 3.1.1 The City shall not allow development in areas having the following development limitations except where it can be shown that established and proven engineering techniques related to a specific site plan will make the area suitable for the propose development. (Note: this policy does not apply to lands designated as significant wetlands on the floodplain and wetlands map.): UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE(ZON2005-00009) PAGE 3 OF 11 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2006-02 PC Y • a. Areas meeting the definition of wetlands under Chapter 1.26 of the community development code. b. Areas having a severe soil erosion potential; c. Areas subject to slumping, earth slides or movement; d. Areas having slopes in excess of 25%; or e. Areas having severe weak foundation soils. The subject site is flat and fully covered by buildings or graveled parking and work areas. The site is approximately 240 feet west of Fanno Creek at its closest point and separated from it by SW 74th Avenue, railroad tracks, and commercial development. According to the City's inventories, the subject property does not include wetlands or any of the development limitations listed above. However, should any of these development limitations be present on site, at the time of development the applicant would be required to demonstrate through a specific site plan that the area is suitable lor the proposed development. FINDING: The proposed zone change is consistent with the applicable Natural Features and Open Space policies. 5. ECONOMY: 5.1 The City shall promote activities aimed at the diversification of the economic opportunities available to Tigard residents with particular emphasis placed on the growth of the local job market. According to the applicant's narrative, the proposed zone change will facilitate a wide range of more employee-intensive uses than the existing I-L zone, so the zone change will stimulate economic development and provide city residents with the opportunity to work near home. In addition, there are positive economic benefits from the proposed office uses, particularly to nearby restaurants and other retail businesses. 5.4 The City shall ensure that new commercial and industrial development shall not encroach into residential areas that have not been designated for commercial or industrial uses. The subject site is surrounded by lands zoned I-P and I-L. The nearest residentially zoned land is approximately 700 feet to the west and is separated from the subject site by a railroad, 74th Avenue, and Fanno Creek. The proposed office use would-not encroach into nearby residential areas. FINDING: The proposed zone change is consistent with the applicable Economic policies. 7. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES: 7.1.2 The City shall require as a pre-condition to development approval that; a. Development coincide with the availability of adequate service capacity including: 1. Public water; 2. Public sewer shall be required for new development within the city unless the property involved in over 300 feet from a sewer line and Washington County Health Department approval for a private disposal system is obtained; and 3. Storm drainage. b. The facilities are: 1. Capable of adequately serving all intervening properties and the proposed development; and 2. Designed to city standards. c. All new development utilities to be placed underground. According, to the applicant's narrative, the properties are already connected to public water, sewer and storm facilities and that upon preliminary review, there are adequate utilities to serve the site. The proposed office use of the site, subject to approval of this zone change request, will undergo site development review to ensure that public facilities and services are adequate, capable of serving intervening properties, and designed to city standards. UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE(ZON2005-00009) PAGE 4 OF 11 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2006-02 PC • • FINDING: The proposed zone change is consistent with the applicable Public Facilities and Services policies. 8. TRANSPORTATION: Transportation System 8.1.1 Plan, design and construct transportation facilities in a manner which enhances the livability of Tigard by: a. Proper location and design of transportation facilities. b. Encouraging pedestrian accessibility by providing safe, secure and desirable pedestrian routes. c. Addressing issues of excessive speeding and through traffic on local residential streets through a neighborhood traffic program. The program should address corrective measures for existing problems and assure that development incorporates traffic calming. 8.1.2 Provide a balanced transportation system, incorporating all modes of transportation (including motor vehicle,bicycle, pedestrian, transit and other modes) by: a. The development of and implementation of public street standards that recognize the multi-purpose nature of the street right-of-way for utility, pedestrian, bicycle, transit, truck and auto use. b. Coordination with Tri-met, and/or any other transit providers serving Tigard, to improve transit service to Tigard. Fixed route transit will primarily use arterial and collector streets in Tigard. Development adjacent to transit routes will provide direct pedestrian accessibility. c. Construction of bicycle lanes on all arterials and collectors within Tigard consistent with the bicycle master. All schools, parks, public facilities and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a bikeway. d. Construction of sidewalks on all streets within Tigard. All schools parks, public facilities and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a sidewalk. e. Development of bicycle and pedestrian plans which link to recreational trails. f. Design local streets to encourage a reduction in trip length by providing connectivity and limiting out-of-direction travel and provide connectivity to activity centers and destinations with a priority for bicycle and pedestrian connections. g. Tigard will participate in vehicle tnp reduction strategies developed regionally targeted to achieve non-single occupant vehicle levels outlined in Table 1.3 of the Regional Transportation Plan. h. Tigard will support the development of a commuter rail system as part of the regional transit network. The Transportation Goal olicies and implementation strategies are largely directed at the City and include objectives that create the framework for ensuring that the transportation system is adequate for all modes of travel at the time development occurs. These objectives are implemented by the Development Code standards that apply during development review. 8.1.4 Set and maintain transportation performance measures that: a. Set a minimum intersection level of service standard for the City of Tigard and requires all public facilities to be designed to meet this standard. b. Set parking ratios to provide adequate parking, while providing an incentive to limit the use of�e single occupant vehicle. c. Encourage working with other transportation providers in Washington County, including Tri-Met,Metro and ODOT to develop, operate and maintain intelligent transportation systems,including coordination of traffic. g Marah Danielson, Oregon Department of Transportation Development Review Planner, commented on the subject zone change proposal in a letter to the City on February 23,2006: UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE(ZON2005-00009) PAGE 5 OF 11 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2006-02 PC v • • We have reviewed the applicant's proposal to rezone six acres from light industrial (I-L) to industrial park (I-P). The site is in the vicinity of the Upper Boones Ferry Rd/I-5 interchange and the Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Durham Rd intersection. ODOT has jurisdiction of these State highway facilities and an interest in assuring that the proposed zone change is consistent with the identified function, capacity and performance standard of this facility. According to the 1999 Oregon Highway Plan (OHP), I-5 is classified as an Interstate highway facility and Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Durham Rd is classified as a District highway facility. ODOT has jurisdiction over the SW and NW legs of the Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Durham Rd intersection. The performance standard for these facilities is 0.99 volume to capacity(v/c) ratio. For zone changes and comprehensive plan amendments local governments must make findings that the proposed amendment complies with the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) OAR 660-012- 0060. There must be substantial evidence in the record to either make the finding of "no significant effect" on the transportation system, or if there is a significant effect assurance that the allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity, and performance standard of the transportation facility as measured at the end of the planning period identified in the City's Transportation System Plan or for state highways apply the highway mobility standard (volume-to- capacity ratio) identified in the Oregon Highway Plan over a planning horizon of the adopted local transportation system plan or 15 years from the proposed date of amendment adoption,whichever is greater(OHP Action 1F2). Oregon Highway Plan (OHP) Action 1F6 applies to situations where the highway facility is operating above the OHP mobility standard and transportation improvements are not planned within the planning horizon to bring performance to standard, the performance standard is to avoid further degradation. If the proposed zone change or comprehensive plan amendment increases the volume- to-capacity ratio further,it will significantly affect the facility. Findings for the I-5 southbound ramp terminus on Upper Boones Ferry Rd intersection ODOT Region 1 Traffic has reviewed the traffic impact study(ITS) prepared by Kittelson and Assoc January 18th, 2006 for impacts to the I-5 southbound ramp terminus on Upper Boones Ferry Rd. In the planning horizon year 2021 the v/c with the existing zoning at the intersection will be 1.09 and with the proposed zoning will be 1.10 both of which exceed the OHP maximum v/c of 0.99. As per OHP action 1F6, with this increase in the v/c ratio means that the proposed zone change will significantly effect the I-5 southbound ramp terminus/Upper Boones Ferry Rd intersection. To mitigate for the significant effect, Kittelson proposes to optimize the signal timing to bring the v/c back to the current zoning level. Optimizing the signal timing is not adequate mitigation because ODOT relies on signal timing to maintain optimal intersection function for vehicles getting off the interstate and may adjust as necessary when conditions change. Based on ODOT's analysis, an eastbound right turn lane is warranted at the intersection and would improve the operation of the intersection. Because the proposed zone change only increases the v/c ratio slightly from 1.09 to 1.10, ODOT recommends that the City require the applicant to contribute their "proportionate share" towards the installation of an eastbound right turn lane. ODOT requests the City collect money towards this improvement on our behalf. Recommended Condition of Approval The applicant shall contribute to the City their"proportionate share" of the eastbound right turn lane at the I-5 southbound ramp terminal/Upper Boones Ferry Rd intersection. Proportionate Share=s/(f-e) +s)*100 =45/((3380-2650) +45)"100 =5.81% s = 2021 Total PM Peak Hour Intersection Trips w/ Proposed Zoning (TIS figure 4) — 2021 Total PM Peak Hour Intersection Traffic w/ Current Zoning (TIS figure 3) =45 (f-e) =background traffic growth f =2021 Total PM Peak Hour Intersection Trips w/ Current Zoning (TIS figure 3) =3380 e=2006 Total PM Peak Hour Intersection Trips w/ Current Zoning (figure 1) =2650 UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE(ZON2005-00009) PAGE 6 OF 11 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2006-02 PC • • Additional Comments The ODOT Rail Division has reviewed the TIS for impacts of the proposed zone change on the public rail crossing on Durham Rd. There is an existing queuing problem across the rail tracks. City staff has indicated that the City will be making a "reasonably likely" determination for funding of the identified widening of Durham Rd to 5 lanes in the City's TSP. The widening of the rail road crossing will require a Rail Order be obtained from the ODOT Rail Division. As part of the Rail Order, the safety of the crossing will need to be evaluated and upgraded as necessary to address crossing safety. ODOT appreciates the City's willingness to work together to collect funds to address the capacity constraints at the I-5 southbound ramp terminal intersection. We look forward to working with the City to develop a reasonable travel shed and proportionate share formula for collecting money towards the eastbound right turn lane from future proposed developments under existing zoning to improve the capacity at the intersection. The City of Tigard Engineering Department concurs with ODOT's conclusion. Therefore, conditions will be imposed consistent with the transportation performance measures of Section 8.1.4,.as identified below. 8.2 Trafficways 8.2.1 The city shall plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. 8.2.2 The city shall provide for efficient management of the transportation planning process within the city and the metropolitan area through cooperation with other federal, state, regional and local jurisdictions. 8.2.3 The city shall require as a precondition to development approval that: A. Development abut a publicly dedicated street orhave adequate Access approved by the appropriate approval authority; B. Street right-of-way be dedicated where the street is substandard in width; C. The developer commit to the construction of the streets,curbs And sidewalks to city standards within the development; D. Individual developers participate in the improvement of existing streets, curbs and sidewalks to the extent of the development's impacts; E. Street improvements be made and street signs or signals be provided when the development is found to create or intensify a traffic hazard; F. Transit stops,bus turnout lanes and shelters be provided when the proposed use of a type which generates transit ridership; G. Parking spaces be set aside and marked for cars operated by disabled persons and that the spaces be located as close as possible to the entrance designed for disabled persons; and H. Land be dedicated to implement the bicycle/pedestrian corridor in accordance with the adopted plan. The Transportation Goal olicies and implementation strategies are largely directed at the City and include objectives that create the framework for ensuring that the transportation system is adequate for all modes of travel at the time development occurs. These objectives are implemented by the Development Code standards that apply during development review. According to the applicant's narrative, the proposed subsequent development anticipates reducing the number of access points into the site from four to two and eliminates the driveway crossing of the railroad. tracks. As a result access to and from the subject property would be made safer. The City may require additional dedication of land to meet current street right-of-way requirements on Upper Boones Ferry Road. However, the dedication of right-of-way will be addressed under Site Development Review. UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE(ZON2005-00009) PAGE 7 OF 11 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2006-02 PC • • The proposed office use is likely to generate increased transit ridership. Tri-Met bus routes 38, 76, and 96 serve the subject site with a bus stop located directly in front of the site on Upper Boones Ferry Road and SW 72nd Avenue. The applicant states they will work with Tri-Met to make any reasonable pedestrian or transit-oriented improvements that will encourage transit ridership. Any proposed development for the subject site will be required to meet the standards of Section 1810 of the Tigard Development Code regarding transit facilities during development review. The Site Plan will also be reviewed by Tri-Met as part of the Site Development Review application. All on-site parking and circulation for any proposed development will be done to City specifications as required by the Tigard Development Code. FINDING: As shown in the foregoing analysis, the City's Comprehensive Plan Transportation Polices have been met with the exception of the Transportation Performance Measures. City Engineering Staff concurs with ODOT's conclusion regarding the transportation performance measures. Therefore, with imposition of the following conditions, the transportation policies can be met. CONDITIONS: The applicant shall contribute to the City their "proportionate share" of the eastbound right turn lane at the I-5 southbound ramp terminal/Upper Boones Ferry Rd intersection; and The applicant shall contribute to the City their "proportionate share" of the improvement costs for providing a second southbound through lane and a southbound right-turn lane at the Durham Road/Upper Boones Ferry Road intersection. The City Engineer will determine the proportionate share. 9. ENERGY: 9.1.3 The City shall encourage land use development which emphasizes sound energy conservation, design and construction. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 3. The City shall locate higher densities and intensities of land use in proximity to existing and potential transit routes specifically with convenient access to federal and state highways, arterials and major collector streets. 8. The City shall coordinate with and support public and private planning efforts that advocate alternative forms of transportation such as mass transit, carpooling, ride share, bicycling and walking for commuter purposes. The site is located on Upper Boones Ferry Road (an arterial) which is within 1/4 mile of I-5 and lh mile of two 1-5 interchanges. Two other arterials, SW 72nd Avenue and SW Durham Road intersect with Upper Boones Ferry Road within 500 feet of the subject site. The proposed zone change would allow office use of the site, which would be a more intense use in terms of vehicle trips per day than industrial uses currently allowed. According to the applicant's narrative, future employees and visitors may walk, bicycle, car-pool, take a bus, or dnve to the site. These modes will be addressed during development review of any subsequently proposed use of the site. FINDING: The proposed zone change will allow for an efficient use of the transportation system to conserve energy,consistent with the applicable Energy policies. 12. LOCATIONAL CRITERIA: 12.3 INDUSTRIAL. The intent of the industrial land use designation is to: 1. Provide for the designation of suitable lands for industrial use; UPPERBOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE(ZON2005-00009) PAGE 8 OF 11 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2006-02 PC • • 2. Provide for economic growth and development; 3. Protect existing and otential lands suitable for industrial development from encroachment by non-industrial or incompatible uses; 4. Provide land for industrial use by type to minimize the impact on surrounding development; and 5. Take advantage of existing transportation facilities. Industrial lands are classified as: Heavy industrial lands are areas intended to rovide for manufacturing, processing and assembling activities. Uses within this classification are characterized by large buildings and large storage areas and as having associated external effects such as smoke, noise, odor or visual pollution. Light industrial lands are areas intended to provide for manufacturing, rocessing assembling and related office activities. Uses within this classification are of-a size and scale which makes them generally compatible with other non-industrial uses and which have no off-site effects. The land use map designates specific areas of the city for industrial development. Over time, however, there may be a demand for new sites. Therefore, the following policy will apply in making such decisions. 12.3.1 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE THAT: a. Sites for heavy industrial development shall be: (1) Separated by topography established buffers, transportation or other non- residential land uses from residentially developed areas. (2) Located in areas having rail service, arterial or major collector access. b. Sites for light industrial development shall be: (1) Buffered from residential areas to ensure that privacy and the residential character of the area are preserved. (2) Located on an arterial or collector street and that industrial traffic shall not be channeled through residential areas. c. The site shall be of a size and shape which will provide for the short and log range needs of the use. d. The land intended for development shall have an average site topography of less than 6% grade, or that it can be demonstrated that through engineering techniques all limitations to development and the provision of services can be mitigated. e. It can be demonstrated that associated lights, noise and other external effects will not interfere with the activities and uses on surrounding properties. f. All other applicable plan policies can be met. The site is buffered from residential areas and is located on an arterial street that provides connection to other arterials and collectors without going through a residential neighborhood. The site is appropriate for the uses allowed in the I-P zone because it is level and at 6 acres is an adequate size and shape for the intended office use as proposed in the applicant's narrative. The uses allowed in the proposed I-P zone are less intense in terms of environmental impacts than those allowed in the I-L zone and the industrial uses in the I-P zone are prohibited from creating adverse off-site impacts such as noise, vibration, glare, outdoor lighting and odors. The subject site is almost completely surrounded by properties zoned I-P, so the proposed zone change will make the site more compatible with its surroundings, consistent with the Locational Criteria for lands zoned Light Industrial. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies outlined above have been adequately addressed. 18.380.030.B.2 Demonstration of compliance with all applicable standards of any provision of this code or other applicable implementing ordinance; and- UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE(ZON2005-00009) PAGE 9 OF 11 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2006-02 PC • • FINDING: The proposed zone change does not include a specific development proposal at this time. However, during Site Development Review, any new development will be required to meet all of the current Tigard Development Code standards of the I-P zone. 18.380.030.B.3 Evidence of change in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to the property which is the subject of the development application. Staff reviewed the zoning history of the industrial zoned lands south of SW Bonita Road, east of SW 74th Avenue, west of I-5 and north of Tualatin in the vicinity of the proposed zone change and found that since the conversion from M3 industrial zoning to I-L and I-P in 1983,there has been a steady conversion of I-L zoned lands to I-P zoned land. Of approximately 254 acres zoned I-L in this area in 1983, approximately 90 acres, or 35%, have been converted to I-P. The proposed zone change would convert an additional 2.4% of this area to I-P. In 1983 the subject site was bordered on two sides by I-P zoned properties. Adjacent lands to the north and southeast were subsequently converted to the I-P zone. Today the subject site is virtually surrounded by lands zone I-P. The applicant's narrative provides a broader perspective regarding evidence of change in the community, including the legislative conversion of industrial zoned lands to mixed use commercial CG�) and employment (METE) districts in the Washington Square sector of Tigard to the north, and Tiialatin's conversion of industrial zoned lands to mixed use commercial in the Bridgeport Village area to the south. The applicant asserts that the proposed zone change and prospective office development reflects a maturation of the market for Class "A" office buildings in the Wilsonville/Kruse Way I-5 corridor. FINDING: The foregoing. demonstrates that there has been a significant and steady change (conversion of lands zoned I.L to I-P) in the neighborhood and that the proposed zone change represents a further incremental change consistent with this trend. There is no apparent evidence of a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map. SECTION VI. ADDITIONAL CITY STAFF AND OUTSIDE AGENCY COMMENTS City of Tigard Public Works Department have reviewed this proposal and offered no comments or objections City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and offered no comments or objections. City of Tigard Long Range Planning Department has reviewed the proposal and raised several questions in a December 7, 2005 Memo (attached). The memo questions whether the I-P development standards provide guidance to encourage the combination of uses that are desired in the zone whether the evolution into primarily office uses will adversely impact industrial uses, and whether the lack of a maximum FAR in the I-P zone will attract further office park development? In a December 9, 2005 Addendum (attached) to the above Memo, Long Range Planning Staff address the proposed rezone's compliance with the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan and find that it is consistent with the applicable standards. RESPONSE: The I-P zoning district is characterized as providing "appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office, and small-scale commercial uses . . ." The text in TDC 18.530.020 is ambiguous as to whether these uses are to be combined on a parcel basis or on a district-wide basis. Both are likely to occur as in the proposed office-only development and alternatively in the mixed use campus development of the Pacific ReaLt properties south of the Upper Boones Ferry/Durham Road intersection and to a lesser degree along SW 74th Avenue. Since office use is a less intense use it is unlikely that there would be any off-site adverse impacts to the remaining lands zoned I-L. The buffering and screening standards in Table 18.745.1 do not differentiate between the two zones and no buffering or screening is required. UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE(ZON2005-00009) PAGE 10 OF 11 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2006-02 PC • • There are many locational factors affecting siting.of proposed development. The lack of a maximum FAR in the I-P zone may be an advantage. However, site coverage and building height standards otherwise limit the development's potential FAR in the I-P. City of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and concurs with the recommendation by ODOT to condition approval of the proposed zone change to address the transportation performance issues raised in ODOT's February 23, 2005 letter. ODOT reviewed the proposed zone change. Marah Danielson, Oregon Department of Transportation Development Review Planner, submitted a comment letter to the City on February 23, 2006. In the letter ODOT recommends conditions of approval to mitigate for the significant effect the proposed zone change will have on the I-5 southbound ramp terminus/Upper Boones Ferry Rd intersection. ODOT's letter is included above in its entirety. The Cities of Durham, Lake Oswego, and Tualatin, and METRO, and Washington County were notified of the proposed amendment and did not respond. SECTION VII. STAFF ANALYSIS Based on the information above, the proposed zone change complies with or can be made to comply with the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies, subject to conditions of approval contained in this decision. As there is no specific development proposal associated with the proposed zone change, the City of Tigard's Development Code chapters do not apply. Staff finds that the proposed zone change from I-L to I-P does not reduce industrially zoned lands in the City of Tigard or significantly reduce the types of activities that would be allowed on the subject property. The I-P zoning district does allow a broader range of uses that will expand the range of possible tenants for the property in the future. Pursuant to ODOT's concerns, as expressed in their comments on the proposed zone change, the change from I-L to I-P would have a significant impact on the street system. Therefore, Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve with conditions the requested zone change. SECTION IX. CONCLUSION The City of Tigard Planning Commission has A PPROVED, Zone Change (ZON2005-00009) - UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE APPLICANT AND ALL PARTIES TO THESE PROCEEDINGS BE NOTIFIED OF THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER PASSED: THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2006 BY THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION. Judy Munro,Acting Planning Commission President Dated this 20th day of March, 2006. is\cu pin\gary\zon change\ZON2005-00009(Upper Boones Zone Change)\zon2005-00009final order UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE(ZON2005-00009) PAGE 11 OF 11 PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO.2006-02 PC ° CITY of TIGARD LIT-N\ GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM I � �� VICINITY MAP U eio y - <�� 10N2005-00009 5 I °°� UPPER BOONES FERRY 0 / hi-- _ . J ROAD ZONE CHANGE l 'I. N. . \ cp — 2 w \ \ \ I }A.RS FERR I- 7 '' y FER ' / ♦ �aiiii .1 U) 0 l�'.. \ SOS ~� ` S� __________________ 1 ' BUII. A BONnA�'D (/ _ m BE FBEND RD DURH, qM,Q� I NO . a 16 Tigard Area Map 4.' n 0 100 200 300 400 Feet LP RI 324 feet aG • A, ?7 ...1,1_:III 'AQ City of Tigard J Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 httpalwww.ci.tigard.or.us COmmynity'Development Plot date:Nov 14,2005;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR • • • EXHIBITa_ ADC Design Group ZON2005-00009 'Attn: Ed Murphy UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD '20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive ZONE CHANGE Hillsboro, OR 97124 Richard Ackerman, James Wathey And LaRusso Concrete Co., Inc. do Ackerman 919 West Point Road Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Rich Akerman/James E. Wathey By Rash #921 37 0006059A97 PO Box 260888 Plano, TX 75026 Richard D. Akerman & James E. Wathey By Rash #921 37 0006059A97 PO Box 260888 Plano, TX 75026 LaRusso Concrete Company, Inc. 15930 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 ODOT Region 1 Attn: Marah Danielson 123 NW Flanders Street Portland, OR 97209-4037 • A CITTOF TIGARD • , COMMUNITY I� OREGON M NEWSPAPERS PERc NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ♦ ♦ V/� v The following will be considered by the Tigard Planning 6605 SE Lake Road, Portland,OR 97222• PO Commission on Monday December 19. 2005. at 7:00 PM at the Box 22109• Portland, OR 97269 Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Phone:503-684-0360 Fax:503-620-3433 Oregon.Both public oral and written testimony is invited. The public Email: hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordan ce with Chapter legaladvertising @commnewspapers.com 18.390 of the Tigard Municipal Code, and the rules of procedure adopted by the Planning Commission. Testimony may be submitted in writing prior to or at the public hearing or verbally at the public le AFFIDAVIT O F PUBLICATION hearing t only. the close of the hearing a companied r by statements or State of Oregon, County of Washington, SS evidence sufficient to allow the hearings authority and all the parties to respond on the request,precludes an appeal,and failure to specify I, Charlotte Allsop, being the first duly sworn, the criterion from the ,Community Development Code or depose and say that I am the Accounting Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an Manager of The Times(serving Tigard, appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals based on that precludes n. Tualatin & Sherwood), a newspaper of -- information may be obtained from.the Planning Division- general circulation, published at Beaverton., in (staff contact Gary Pa enstecherl at 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,- f tha- the aforesaid county and state, as defined by •Tigard reg0 on 97223, or by calling 503-639-4171. Y copy ORS 193.010 and 193.020, that application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the of applicable staff criteria ort are be available madef available t for.: Public of Tigard inspection pe cost. A copy report prior to the hearing, and= inspection at no cost at least seven(7)days p - Public Hearing-Upper Boones Ferry copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. TT10717 ZONE CHANGE(ZON)2005-00009 = UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE a copy of which is hereto annexed, was REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval for a Zone hne py to Industrial Park I-P for approximately published in the entire issue of said from Light Industrial between t ( ) Upper Boones newspaper for six (6) acres located between SW gentle developed per outdoor 1 Ferry Road. The subject property, currently led w envisions storage and older industrial an buildings. which is no permitted in developing the property successive and consecutive weeks in the the Light Industrial zone. LOCATION: 15920 SW 74t Avenue nd following issues 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and adjoining properties. December 1, 2005 WCTM 2S113AB, Tax Lots 200/300/400/500; and 2S112DC, Tax, Lots 1100/1200/1300., CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial, e , 0inganager) District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for• general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing. Charlotte Allsop (Account and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale salscoidoreand vibration. PROPO ED ' characteristics such as noise,glare, Subscribed and sworn to before 'ths ZONE: I-P:Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturi l services and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants,person December 1, 2005 fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial' 5,,z ,a c.., uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are.permitted in the I-P zone.In addition to mandatory site development NOTAR oBLIC FOR OREGON review,design and development standards in the I-P zone have been My commission expires ( f a� adopted to insure that ndvpedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE 1 REVIEW R Tca A and p Development Code Chapters. REVIEW CRITERIA: Community P 18.380, 18.390 and 18.520.Publish 12/1/05 TT10717 Acct#10093001 ��"�"�1'�" ._ nn Patricia Lunsford r;� a��m•ufl� I I C"".`" ________ _ City of Tigard ()) : r Si. �rIP�,. ( _- y g ( ' � NOT Iii-: 10N1OOS-DODOV_-- 13125 SW Hall Blvd ) __°°°'---- Tigard, OR 97223 1 MY COMMISSIO I llh= / UPPER BOONES FERRY \,..,..�...��1...`...` I I i ROAD LONE CHANGE Size 2 x 11.5 1 - Amount Due $192.05 I ` u�m� d( *remit to address above 11W4II 111111111's �� �.tC..L \ \ ,... ...., .. .i ,,\ , -,it -Lt,',;.-,,,,7„/.41„, , ,,, a • 4 id Y a • CITIOOF TIGARD COI�AMUNITY ��``, OREGON 1 ■ SPAPEIRS NOTICE RIN The following will be OF considered PUBLIC by HEA the Tigard Planning 6605 SE Lake Road, Portland,OR 97222• PO Commission on Monday December 19. 2005. at 7:00 PM at the Box 22109• Portland, OR 97269 Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Phone:503-684-0360 Fax: 503-620-3433 Oregon.Both public oral and written testimony is invited. The public Email: hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with Chapter legaladvertising @commnewspapers.com 18.390 of the Tigard Municipal Code, and the rules of procedure adopted by the Planning Commission. Testimony may be submitted in writing prior to or at the public hearing or verbally at the public AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION hearing only. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some P State of Oregon, County of Washington, SS ei tc I, Charlotte Allsop, being the first duly sworn, ' ti depose and say that I am the Accounting C Manager of The Times(serving Tigard, 1 Tualatin & Sherwood), a newspaper of Fi general circulation, published at Beaverton, in 6 the aforesaid county and state, as defined by T? • ORS 193.010 and 193.020, that I r c City of Tigard « ' '''',404 Public Hearing-Upper Boones Ferry ; UU1 �s•�`ta " TT10717 q �,7 a copy of which is hereto annexed, was 11° r, 1 ,E n I published in the entire issue of said °v " ei fl1 newspaper for I fffl 1DaMt$d;_ , .'rte 4 �', ,4, 1 e e '�` efit :' , I, successive and consecutive weeks in the following issues December 1, 2005 e L Charlotte Allsop (Accounting anager) Subscribed and sworn to before me this December 1, 2005 NOTAR UBLIC FOR OREGON My commission expires\•y\ov cps 0.001-7 0.001-7 Acct#10093001 ^ " - "�'�"�"1'�"�=�"�'.'��'�'�'�-�'� Patricia Lunsford () Og"'�; OFFICIAL SEAL �J ( "' :f : SUZETTE I CURRAN 1 City of Tigard () NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON f 13125 SW Hall Blvd () COMMISSION NO.373063 ) Tigard, OR 97223 1 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOV.28,2007() Size 2 x 11.5 Amount Due $192.05 remit to address above • n ?FFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OFTIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community I, �PatriciaL.Lunsford being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a SeniorAdministrative Speciafist for the City ofTgard Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR:l7 10N2005-00009/UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) HEARING BODY: HEARING DATE: ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ® Tigard Planning Commission (12/19/2005) ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on November 28,2005,and deposited in the United States Mail on November 28,2005, postage prepaid. tI4 l ; n ('erson that Pr-eared Notice) STATE OF OREGON ) County of`Was ington )ss. City of ward ) ll -r.N Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the ( u day of rae _ , 2005. ;I Lj r>`"t 6IAL SEAL — ' r141P�`;r e i''I �$Ir1 .11„ 1 &ea NOTARY OR G My Com n Expires: ,1.- I - 07 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOL•,VENDOR OR SELLER: S EXFI I B IT A THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. A: CITY OF TIGARD Community Devethpment Shaping A Better Community PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2005 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO.: ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2005-00009 FILE TITLE: UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE APPLICANT.: LDC Design Group OWNER: Richard Ackerman, James Wathey Attn: Ed Murphy and LaRusso Concrete Co., Inc. 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive do Ackerman Hillsboro, OR 97124 919 West Point Road Lake Oswego, OR 97034 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval for a Zone Change from Light Indtstrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) for approximately six (6) acres located between SW 74 Avenue and Upper Boones Ferry Road. The subject property is currently developed with outdoor storage and older industrial buildings. The applicant envisions developing the property with an office use, which is not permitted in the Light Industrial zone. LOCATION: . 15920 SW 74th Avenue and 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and adjJoiningg ropperties. WCTM 2S113AB, Tax Lots 200/300/400/500; and 2S112DC, Tax Lots 1100/1200/1300. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.530. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 2438 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ! .A ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WWTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOS ACTION, MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE OR DOCUMENTS LESS THAN 7 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE, THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY MAY ALLOW A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING, SUBJECT TO ORS 215.428 OR 227.178. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL BE BASED UPON THE CRITERIA LISTED OR OTHER CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH THE PERSON BELIEVES TO APPLY TO THE DECISION. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST, ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (250 PER.PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER GARY PAGENSTECHER AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. • .I CITY OI TIGARD I tip,Illf� LI ZON2005-00009 1 1 a \ �y I I I a0 Q �OCP� 74TH AVENUE ,u` J ZONE CHANGE lit ,,, \ i, PIO Er iv: , WI r .. .\\:, 1 piwriiiviti _.....,,. ,„„.......ir ,.. „„ir,, :%: , N ..., ,. . . ..„....,., II, _ \ _, I LL:im N cuy of Tigard MOM ,. . EXHIBI 74TH AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK LLC • DUNCAN JOHN ARTHUR AND ��,, 8100 SW DURHAM RD JANICE LEE TIGARD,OR 97224 8321 NW RIDGETOP CT PORTLAND,OR 97229 2S113AB-00300 2S112DC-01400 AKERMAN RICH/WATHEY JAMES E JDS LLC& BY RASH#921 37 0006059A97 SANTA FE INVESTORS#1 LLC • PO BOX 260888 C/O PACIFIC SANTA FE CORP PLANO,TX 75026 17700 SW UPPPER BOONES FERRY RD PORTLAND,OR 97224 23112DC-01100 2S11200-00400 AKERMAN RICHARD D& KAUFMAN LOTTIE L& WATHEY JAMES E SUBOTNICK RUTH ET AL BY RASH#921 37 0006059A97 BY PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES PO BOX 260888 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI PLANO,TX 75026 PORTLAND,OR 97224 112DC-01200 2S112DC-01300 A RMAN RICHA D& LARUSSO CONCRETE COMPANY INC WAT Y JAM E 15930 SW 74TH AVE BY RAS 21 37 0006059A97 TIGARD,OR 97224 P 0 3 1.0 2 6 0 8 NO,TX 7 26 2S113AB-00200 2S112DC-01800 A' RMAN RICH• D D& NADEAU ANDRE R TRUSTEE WAT' Y JA' S E 7774 VLAHOS DR BY RAS' <'921 37 0006059A97 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 PO :' 26''88 Pi'NO,TX 75026 2S 113AB-00400 25112 DC-01700 A . RMAN RICHA:' D& NADEAU LINDA WAT' Y JA A E 7409 SW LOCUST ST BY RA •21 37 0006059A97 TIGARD,OR 97223 PO :'j 26•;88 P/•NO,TX 758 • 113AB-00500 1 S135CB-00800 A .-MAN RICH; D D& OREGON STATE OF WAT . Y J•∎ S E DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION BY RAS- ;=921 37 0006059A97 RIGHT OF WAY SECTION PO :•X 26'•:8 355 CAPITOL ST NE RM 420 NO,TX 75026 SALEM,OR 97301 2S113AB-00700 2S112DC-00200 B&R INVESTMENTS PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES 16255 SW UPPER BOONES FERRY RD ATTN: N PIVEN TIGARD,OR 97224 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300 PORTLAND,OR 97224 113AB-01000 112DC-00100 B& ' •VE NTS PA IC RE Y ASSOCIATES 16255 - R BOONES FERRY RD ATTN: VEN T ARD,OR 972 4 153 SW UOIA PKWY#300 RTLAND,OR 97224 2S113AB-00800 2S 2D0-00200 DUNCAN JOHN A AND PAC C R LTY ASSOCIATES JANICE LEE ATTN: VEN 8321 NW RIDGETOP CT 15 SW S UOIA PKWY#300 PORTLAND,OR 97229 ORTLAND,OR 97224 • , { • .J 2S113RB-00600 • 2S112DD-00300 • PA IC RE• ASSOCIATES TIME OIL CO . ATTN: ' VEN P 0 BOX 24447 153 : S EQUOIA PKWY#300 SEATTLE,WA 98124 '•RTLAND, •R 97224. 2S112DC-00500 2S113AB-00100 PA IC RE• ASSOCIATES WASHINGTON COUNTY ATTN: ■ • EN c/o PACIFIC REALTY TRUST 15351 W .•UOIA PKWY#300 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI P%'TLAND,O' 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S113AA-00600 PA IC RE TY ASSOCIATES • ATTN: EN 1535 EQUOIA PKWY#300 P TLAND,OR 97224 • 2S112DC-00701 P• IFIC RE• . ASSOCIATES ATT • N ' EN 15351 W SEQUOIA PKWY#300 P "-ILA D.OR 97224 2S113AA-00400 P• IFIC '• •LTY ASSOCIATES ATT • • PIVEN 153 • ` SEQUOIA PKWY#300 '•RTLANa,OR 97224 2S113AA-00500 PA IFIC R LTY ASSOCIATES ATT . IVEN 153 SEQUOIA PKWY#300 P RTLAND, OR 97224 2S113AB-00101 P)zip/ C LTY ASSOCIATES • AEN 1 SEQUOIA PKWY#300 P AND,OR 97224 2S113AB-0120 '.CIFIC : ALTY ASSOCIATES • A •: '• PIVEN • 15 %1 ' SEQUOIA PKWY#300 •RTLANII,OR 97224 2 112DC-00201 PA, IFIC R.•LTY ASSOCIATES ATT • 'IVEN 153 s SI' SEQUOIA PKWY#300 P'iRTLAN•,OR 97224 2S112DD-00500 SUBOTNICK RUTH& SIEGEL LOTTIE BY PACIFIC REALTY ASSOC 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI PORTLAND,OR 97224 r d. ,.. • Nathan and Ann Murdock Mildren Design roup PO Box 231265 Attn: Gene Mildren Tigard, OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97223 Sue Rorman Diane Baldwin 11250 SW 82nd Avenue 3706 Kinsale Lane SE Tigard, OR 97223 Olympia, WA 98501 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 136th Place Tigard, OR 97224 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 CPO 4M Pat Whiting 8122 SW Spruce Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: 21-Oct-05 . i i • • LDC Design Group ZON2005-00009 Attn: Ed Murphy UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive ZONE CHANGE Hillsboro, OR 97124 Richard Ackerman, James Wathey And LaRusso Concrete Co., Inc. c/o Ackerman 919 West Point Road Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Rich Akerman/James E. Wathey By Rash #921 37 0006059A97 PO Box 260888 Plano, TX 75026 Richard D. Akerman & James E. Wathey By Rash #921 37 0006059A97 PO Box 260888 Plano, TX 75026 LaRusso Concrete Company„Inc. 15930 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 • 1 \ AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THIS AFFIDAVIT AND RETURN IT TO THE CITY AT THE ADDRESS BELOW, ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY OF THE NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE SITE. City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-8189 In the Matter of the Proposed Land Use Applications for: Land Use File Nos.: ZON2005-00009 Land Use File Name: UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE I, Gary Pagenstecher, do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a land use proposal affecting the land located at (state the approximate locatio (s) IF no a ress(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) 6-7.20 Jet) 77 /60 7s-5 'G and did personally post notice of the Public Hearing on the proposed I nd use application(s) b mea s P Yp 9 P P Y of weatherproof posting in the general vicinity of the affected territory, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the day of /�4 2( , 200S /A6/ lfrro,AiL r i Signature of Person � o • erformed Posting h:\login\patty\masters\affidavit of posting for applicant to post public hearing.doc NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING r, The following will be considered by the Tigard Planning Commission on Monday December 19, 2005 at 7:00 PM at the Tigard Civic Center- Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. Both public oral and written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with Chapter 18.390 of the Tigard Municipal Code, and the rules of procedures adopted by the Hearings Officer. Testimony may be submitted in writing prior to or at the public hearing or verbally at the public hearing only. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior to the close of the hearing accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to afford the decision-maker an opportunity to respond to the issue precludes appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeal based on that issue and failure to specify the criterion from the Commune Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division (staff contact: Gary Pagenstecher, Associate Planner) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 503-639-4171. A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven (7) days prior to the hearing, and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM: ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2005-00009 ➢ UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD ZONE CHANGE < REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval for a Zone Change from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) for approximately six (6) acres located between SW 74 Change Avenue and Upper Boones Ferry Road. The subject property is currently developed with outdoor storage and older industrial buildings. The applicant envisions developing the property with an office use which is not permitted in the Light Industrial zone.+ LOCATION: 15920 SW 74 Avenue and 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and adjLoinin ropperties. WCTM 2S113AB Tax Lots 200/300/400/500 and 2S112DC, Tax Lots 1100/1200/1300. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few if any nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park any, The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing,. office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g.,. restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts e.g:, noise,. glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.520. CITY o TIGARD NMIRED 5 ') FOR: 10N2005-00009 • RE: Upd,LEed Mailing List Property er ner trzfert-natten is valid for r prenths froth the date re toed ort tilts reap. .0..d(k°044 3333 $'1,004M d'S.N.VkItt Ark300.0,ft '3 M.11.$3 '3R4A4V#635e SITE '1.i ftp4.46144se .3.1(13,i . . N /No -harp tr r t •2S112DC-01500 • 2S113AB-01600 74TH AVENUE INDUSTRIAL PARK LLC DUNCAN JOHN ARTHUR AND 8100 SW DURHAM RD JANICE LEE TIGARD,OR 97224 8321 NW RIDGETOP CT • ' • PORTLAND,OR 97229 2S113AB-00300 2S112DC-01400 AKERMAN RICH/WATHEY JAMES E JDS LLC& BY RASH#921 37 0006059A97 SANTA FE INVESTORS#1 LLC PO BOX 260888 C/O PACIFIC SANTA FE CORP PLANO,TX 75026 17700 SW UPPPER BOONES FERRY RD PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S112DC-01100 2S112DD-00400 AKERMAN RICHARD D& KAUFMAN LOTTIE L& WATHEY JAMES E SUBOTNICK RUTH ET AL BY RASH#921 37 0006059A97 BY PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES PO BOX 260888 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI PLANO,TX 75026 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S112DC-01200 2S112DC-01300 AKERMAN RICHARD D& • LARUSSO CONCRETE COMPANY INC WATHEY JAMES E 15930 SW 74TH AVE BY RASH#921 37 0006059A97 TIGARD,OR 97224 PO BOX 260888 . PLANO,TX 75026 2S113AB-00200 2S112DC-01800 AKERMAN RICHARD D& NADEAU ANDRE R TRUSTEE WATHEY JAMES E 7774 VLAHOS DR BY RASH#921 37 0006059A97 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 PO BOX 260888 PLANO,TX 75026 2S113A8-00400 2S112DC-01700 AKERMAN RICHARD D& NADEAU LINDA WATHEY JAMES E 7409 SW LOCUST ST BY RASH#921 37 0006059A97 TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 260888 PLANO,TX 75026 2S113AB-00500 1S135CB-00800 AKERMAN RICHARD D& OREGON STATE OF WATHEY JAMES E DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION BY RASH#921 37 0006059A97 RIGHT OF WAY SECTION PO BOX 260888 355 CAPITOL ST NE RM 420 PLANO,TX 75026 SALEM,OR 97301 2S113AB-00700 2S112DC-00200 B&R INVESTMENTS PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES 16255 SW UPPER BOONES FERRY RD ATTN: N PIVEN TIGARD,OR 97224 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S113AB-01000 2S112DC-00100 B&R INVESTMENTS PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES 16255 SW UPPER BOONES FERRY RD ATTN: N PIVEN TIGARD,OR 97224 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S113AB-00800 2S112DD-00200 DUNCAN JOHN A AND PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES JANICE LEE ATTN:N PIVEN 8321 NW RIDGETOP CT 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300 PORTLAND,OR 97229 PORTLAND,OR 97224 •♦ } • 2S113AB-00600 • 2S112DD-00300 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES TIME OIL CO ATTN: N PIVEN P 0 BOX 24447 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300 SEATTLE,WA 98124 PORTLAND,OR 97224. 2S112DC-00500 2S113AB-00100 • PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES WASHINGTON COUNTY ATTN:N PIVEN do PACIFIC REALTY TRUST 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI PORTLAND,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97224 • 2S113AA-00600 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES ATTN: N PIVEN 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S112DC-00701 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES ATTN: N PIVEN 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S113AA-00400 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES ATTN: N PIVEN 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S113AA-00500 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES ATTN: N PIVEN 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S113AB-00101 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES ATTN: N PIVEN 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S113AB-01201 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES ATTN:N PIVEN 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300 PORTLAND,OR 97224 • 2S112DC-00201 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES ATTN: N PIVEN 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S112DD-00500 SUBOTNICK RUTH& SIEGEL LOTTIE BY PACIFIC REALTY ASSOC 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI PORTLAND,OR 97224 • Mildren Design Nathan and Ann Murdock group PO Box 231265 Attn: Gene Mildren Tigard, OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120 Tigard, OR 97223 Sue Rorman Diane Baldwin 11250 SW 82nd Avenue 3706 Kinsale Lane SE Tigard, OR 97223 Olympia, WA 98501 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 136th Place Tigard, OR 97224 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 CPO 4M Pat Whiting 8122 SW Spruce Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: 21-Oct-05 • .1 ; • • • CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ` :', PLANNING DIVISION 13i2i ,513` HALL BOULEVARD CITY OF TIGARD TIGARD.OREGON 9722+. Community Development. Shapinu 13cttcr Community PHONE PHONE 50 4139-4171 FAN:503-694-7297(Attn: Patty/Planning) • REQUEST FOR 500-FOOT PROPERTY OWNER MAILING LIST • Property owner information is valid for- 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP& TAX LOT NUMBERS(i.e. I SI34AB, Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW: 2S1 I3AB,Tax Lots 00300: ...00400: ...005 2S 1121)C.Tax Lots.01 10(1: ...01200: ..10300 0 LgoO PLEASE- BE AWARE THAT ONLY 1 SET OF LABELS WILL BE PROVIDED AT THIS TIME FOR HOLDING YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. After submitting your land use application to the City, and the project planner has reviewed your application for completeness, you will be notified by means of an incompleteness letter to obtain your 2 final sets of labels. • The 2 final sets of labels need to be placed on envelopes with first class letter-rate postage on the envelopes in the form of postage stamps (no metered envelopes and no return address) . and resubmitted to the City for the purpose of providing notice to property owners of the proposed land use application and the decision. The 2 sets of envelopes must be kept separate. The person listed below will be called to pick up and pay for the labels when they are ready, NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: Radcliffe Dacanay, \RG Design PHONE: 503-419-2500 . FAX:503-41 9-2600 . Phis request may be mailed, faxed or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request that will be placed in "Will Call"by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk, The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. • PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY. ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description: S11 to generate the.mailing list plus S2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels(20 addresses per sheet). Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested, EXAMPLE* **COST FOR THIS REQUEST '** 4 sheets of labels x 32/sheet=S8_00 x 2 sets= 516.00 A+ shee:(s,of labels x 52rshee:=S'l/s•O0.x/-:1 sets= 4.00 2 sheets of labels x S2/sheet for interested parties x 2 sets=5 4,00 sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet fodlnterested parties= xF sets=APO GENERATE LIST ' $11.00 • GENERATE LIST= 511.00 TOTAL ' $31.00 • / 4 J `/� / TOTAL= 510 Patty.Lunsf9rd - RE: Request for 500-Foot Property Owner Mailing List Page 1 ; • From: Patty Lunsford To: Radcliffe Dacanay Date: Monday, November 14, 2005 1:37:58 PM Subject: RE: Request for 500-Foot Property Owner Mailing List Good afternoon, I generated the list again for your project and there was one additional property that it picked up. I will take care of updating your mailing list and adding the additional property owner. Have a good day! Patricia Lunsford, Planning Secretary City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171, ext. 2438 patty @tigard-or.gov >>> "Radcliffe Dacanay" <Radcliffe.Dacanay @wrgdesign.com> 11/11/05 8:47:23 AM >>> Hi Patty, I just realized that one of the properties that's part of the site wasn't included in the original mailing label request(for the Fanno Creek Commons site). It is parcel#"2S113AB 00200" (a smaller parcel on the eastern edge of the site). However, including it doesn't appear to affect the mailing list. I assume that since it does not affect the notification list, we're still okay. If that's not the case, please let me know if I need to officially request another set of mailing labels. Thanks!! Radcliffe Dacanay Planner 5415 SW Westgate Drive, Suite 100 Portland, OR 97221 503.419.2500 x251 (P) 503.419.2600 (F) radcliffe.dacanaywrqdesign.com www.wrqdesiqn.com Original Message From: Patty Lunsford Jmailto:PATTY(o�tigard-or.govl Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 9:31 AM To: Radcliffe Dacanay Subject: Re: Request for 500-Foot Property Owner Mailing List Patty.Lunsffrd - RE: Request for 500-Foot Property Owner Mailing List .Page 2 i 4 Hi Radcliffe, Your request for labels is ready. The cost is $17.00 and I will leave them in will-call at the Permit Center under WRG Design. For future reference, it's fine to email me your requests. If you have any questions, please call me. Thanks! Patricia Lunsford, Planning Secretary City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171, ext. 2438 pattatigard-or.gov >>> "Radcliffe Dacanay" <Radcliffe.Dacanay(a�wrgdesign.com> 11/1/05 4:25:52 PM >>> Hi Patty, I attempted to send this request to you via fax, but it appears that it didn't go through. Thus, I'm sending you the Request for 500-foot Property Owner Mailing List via email. I hope this is okay. When they are ready, we will send an assistant to receive and pay for the labels. Please let me know if there is additional information that you need. Thanks!! Radcliffe Dacanay Planner 5415 SW Westgate Drive, Suite 100 Portland, OR 97221 503.419.2500 x251 (P) 503.419.2600 (F) radcliffe.dacanay anwrgdesign.com www.wrqdesign.com <http://www.wrgdesiqn.com/> CITY OF TIGARD 11/3/2005 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 3:00:00PM A p��lin Tigard,Oregon 97223 -61■ �'∎ (503) 639-4171 Receipt #: 27200500000000005676 Date: 11/03/2005 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid LANDUS Land Use Misc. - 17.0000 @$1.0000 100-0000-438000 17.00 Line Item Total: $17.00 Payments: Method Payer User ID Acct./Check No.Approval No. How Received Amount Paid • Check WRG DESIGN,INC CAC 4108 In Person 17.00 Payment Total: $17.00 • cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 2S113AB-00300 • • AKERMAN RICH/WATHEY JAMES E BY RASH#921 37 0006059A97 PO BOX 260888 PLANO,TX 75026 2S113AB-00500 AKERMAN RICHARD D& WATHEY JAMES E BY RASH#921 37 0006059A97 PO BOX 260888 PLANO,TX 75026 2S113AB-00400 AKERMAN RICHA D& WATHEY JAM E BY RASH 21 37 0006059A97 PO B 260888 NO,TX 75026 2S113AB-00200 AKERMAN RICHA D& • S WATHEY JA E BY RAS 21 37 0006059A97 PO 260888 N0,TX 75026 2S112DC-01100 AKERMAN RICH D D& WATHEY J S E BY RAS 921 37 0006059A97 PO X 260888 NO,TX 75026 2S112DC-01200 AKERMAN RICH D& WATHEY J S E BY RA #921 37 0006059A97 PO OX 260888 NO,TX 75026 2S112DC-01300 LARUSSO CONCRETE COMPANY INC 15930 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON November 4, 2005 Ed Murphy LDC Design Croup 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro, OR 97124 RE: Akerman/Wathey/LaRusso Zone Change Application, File# ZON2005-00009 Dear Mr. Murphy: Staff has reviewed your supplemental application materials received November 2, 2005 and has determined that your application is now complete. The formal comment and review process will begin, which typically takes 6 to 8 weeks. Staff will request a hearing at the Planning Commission on December 19, 2005. It should be noted that staff has not reviewed the application submittal for compliance with the relevant code criteria, and that additional items may arise during the application review which may require further clarification. Sincerely, Gary Pagenstecher Associate Planner CC: File ZON2005-00009 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 LAND USE APPLICAtION Project: cr zO141 Date: J''al 6 A COMPLETENESS REVIEW O5 jk COMPLETE ❑ INCOMPLETE y STANDARD INFORMATION: Deed/Title/Proof Of Ownership 4,8 Neighborhood Mtg. Affidavits, Minutes, List Of Attendees 1W Impact Study (18.390) /4 USA Service Provider Letter Construction Cost Estimate [ # Sets Of Application Materials/Plans yPre-Application Conference Notes Envelopes With Postage (Verify Count) PROJECT STATISTICS: /4 21--- • Building Footprint Size ❑ %Of Landscaping On Site ❑ % Of Building Impervious Surface On Site ❑ Lot Square Footage PLANS DIMENSIONED: /IA'' ❑ Building Footprint. ❑ Parking Space Dimensions(Include Accessible&Bike Parking) ❑ Truck Loading Space Where Applicable ❑ Building Height ❑ Access Approach And Aisle ❑ Visual Clearance Triangle Shown ADDITIONAL PLANS: /V/r ❑ Vicinity Map ❑ Architectural Plan ❑ Tree Inventory ❑ Existing Conditions Plan ❑ Landscape Plan ❑ Site Plan ❑ Lighting Plan TREE PLAN/MITIGATION PLAN: /In ❑ Cl ❑ ❑ ADDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special reports) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS: ❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 18.165(off--Street Parking/Loading Requirements) ❑ 18.340(Director's Interpretation) ❑ 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ❑ 1 8.115.(Sensitive Lands Review) ❑ 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ 18.105(Access/Egress/Grculation) ❑ 18.180(Signs) ❑ 18.360(Site Development Review) ❑ 18.110(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) ❑ 18.310(Variances/Adjustments) ❑ 18.715(Density Computations) ❑ 18.190(Tree Removal) a, 18.380(Zoning Hap/Text Amendments) ❑ 1 8.120(Design Compatibility Standards) ❑ 18.195(Yuual Clearance Areas) ❑ 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ❑ 18.125(Environmental Performance Standards) ❑ 18.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) N18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) '❑ 1 8.130(Exceptions To Development Standards) ❑ 1 8.198(Wireless Communication Facilities) 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) ❑ 18.140(Historic Overlay) ❑ 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) ❑ 18.420(Land Partitions) ❑ 18.142(Home Occupation Permits) ❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) ❑ 18.745(landscaping&Saeening Standards) ❑ 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.150(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) •❑ 1 8.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recyding Storage) 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districu) ❑ 18.160(Nonconforming Situations) ADDITIONAL ITEMS: • I:\curpin\masters\revised\land use application completeness review.dot REVISED: 17-Jan-01 • • (110, LDC Design Group November 1, 2005 a Parati company RECEIVED Gary Pagenstecher, Associate Planner MeV o 2 2005 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. CITY OF TIGARD Tigard, Oregon 97223 'A` NYNG/ENGINEERING RE: Zone Change application Dear Mr. Pagenstecher: Attached are fourteen copies of a zone change application for a group of properties off Upper Boones Ferry Road, between Durham Road and 72nd Avenue. We followed the suggestions you made in your letter dated October 28th, and consolidated the affidavit and minutes of the neighborhood meeting with the other documentation of the meeting. We also included a table of contents and identified the narrative portion and the exhibits with a tab. We decided to include the traffic impact analysis by Kittelson & Associates with all 14 copies of the applications so that everyone would have the same information, even though you mentioned that two copies would be adequate. We assume you will now schedule this application for a hearing before the Planning Commission at the earliest possible date. Thanks for your comments and review. We look forward to reading your staff report. If you have any additional questions or need anything else, please contact me. Sincere , Ed Murphy, AIC 20085 NWTanasbourne Drive cc. Richard Akerman Hillsboro,OR 97124 P 503.858.4242 LaRusso Concrete F 503.645.5500 Kevin VandenBrink—Macadam Forbes E hillsboro @ldcdesign.com www.ldcdesign.com Hillsboro,OR Tillamook,OR Vancouver,WA Bellevue,WA Coeur d'Alene,ID Rocklin,CA Clermont,FL • October 28, 2005 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Ed Murphy LDC Design Croup 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Hillsboro, OR 97124 Dear Mr. Murphy: Staff has reviewed your application for completeness and has determined that the following items remain outstanding: /Neighborhood Meeting. Please consolidate your affidavit and minutes of the neighborhood meeting in one place with the other elements documenting the meeting. It would be helpful if your application packet included a table of contents and each section was identified by tab. ✓ Number of Copies. Please submit 14 (full set) copies of you're application materials (only two copies need contain the Traffic Impact Study). Please call me if you have any questions regarding your application(503-718-2434). Sincerely, ter' Gary Pagenstecher Associate Planner CC: File ZON2005-00009 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 • • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ! • ' _ 0 -,'1 LQC . REF 2 8 2005 Design Group a Pour:company Date: September 28, 2005 CM OF Tom ._. To: Dick Bewersdorff Firm: City of Tigard Address: (LDC) Job No.: Project Name: Akerman /Wathey/ LaRusso Zone Change App. Agency No.: Plancheck No.: We are sending you: a Attached ❑ Under Separate Cover Copies Description • 3 Zone Change Applications 1 Application Form 2 Sets of stamped and addressed envelopes 1 Title Report 1 Signed and certified affidavit of posting and mailing These are being transmitted as indicated below: v ❑ As Requested ❑ For Your Use ] For Approval ❑ Other 0085 NW TANASBOURNE DRIVE HILLSBORO OR 97124 PH 503. 858. 4242 FX 503. 645. 5500 Signature: Miriam Wilson WWW.LDCDESIGN.COM CORPORATE OFFICE Title: Plat/ Permit Administrator HILLSBORO, OREGON TILLAMOOK, OREGON 1 Phone: 503-597-2914 VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON E-Mail: Wilsonm @Idcdesign.com • BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON COEUR D'ALENE, IDAHO ROCKLIN, CALIFORNIA CLERMONT, FLORIDA • • LDC September 28, 2005 Design Group a Parati company Dick Bewersdorff,Planning Manager City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Zone Change application Dear Mr. Bewersdorff: Attached are three copies of a zone change application for a group of properties off Upper Boones Ferry Road, between Durham Road and 72nd Avenue. We will submit additional copies after you have determined it to be a complete application. With this application, I am also submitting: • A check for the application fee of$3040; • A completed and signed application form; ♦ Two sets of stamped and addressed envelopes; • One copy of a title report showing ownership; ♦ A signed and certified affidavit of posting and mailing. A traffic impact analysis by Kittelson & Associates is included within the application. If you need anything else in order to find the application complete, please let me know as soon as possible. I look forward to working with you and other staff on this proposed zone change. I think you will find the application thorough and persuasive. Sincerely, Ed Murphy, AICP 20085 NWTanasbourne Drive Hillsboro,OR 97124 P 503.858.4242 F 503.645.5500 cc. Richard Akerman E hillsboro@ldcdesign.com LaRusso Concrete www.ldcdesign.com Kevin VandenBrink—Macadam Forbes Hillsboro,OR Tillamook,OR Vancouver,WA Bellevue,WA Coeur d'Alene,ID Rocklin,CA Clermont,FL • • 0 AMER, C./ First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon An assumed business name ofTITI B INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON 222 SW Columbia St., Suite 400 * Portland, OR 97201 _��� Phone: (503) 219-8746 * Fax: (503) 790-7872 ED MURPHY ED MURPHY&ASSOCIATES 9875 SW MURDOCK ST TIGARD, OR 97224 Order No: 270739 Date: 2005-07-28 Delivery Type: Fax Standard Orders Total: 7 Phone No: Email: NQTE • We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions regarding this report,please call: . . Robert Lynn Phone No: (503) 219-8746 Fax No: (503) 790-7872 This title information has been furnished,without charge,in conformance with the guidelines approved by the State of Oregon Insurance Commissioner. The Insurance Division cautions intermediaries that this service is designed to benefit the ultimate insureds, indiscriminate use only benefiting intermediaries will not be permitted. Said services may be discontinued. No liability is assumed for any errors in this report. Fax: 4S e AMER40 4~ ^ : r f'`°F` ,q`' First AmOican Title Insurance �mpany of Oregon Washington(OR) Prepared For: Prepared By. Customer Service Department 1700 SW Fourth Avenue - Portland, Oregon 97201-5512 Phone: (503)222-3651 Fax: (503)790-7872 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Owner : Akerman Richard D Ref Parcel Number : 2S112DC 01100 CoOwner : Wathey James E T: 02S R: 01W S: 12 Q: 251 Site Address : *no Site Address* Parcel Number : R0513420 Mail Address : 12031 SW Breyman Ave Portland Or 97219 Map Number . Telephone : Owner: Tenant: County :Washington(OR) SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION Transferred : 05/11/1992 Loan Amount . Document# : 31816 Lender . Sale Price Loan Type .• Deed Type Interest Rate . Owned : 100 Vesting Type . PROPERTY DESCRIPTION g ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION Map Page&Grid MktLand : $176,240 Census : Tract: Block: MktStructure . Subdivision/Plat : Fanno Creek Mkt Other . Neighborhood Cd : YI5 Mkt Total : $176,240 Land Use : 3002 Vacant,Industrial M50Assd Total : $111,460 Legal : FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS,LOT PT 35, %Improved . : ACRES .68 04-05 Taxes : $1,817.94 . Exempt Amount : Exempt Type . Levy Code : 02374 Millage Rate : 16.3101 PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS Bedrooms Lot Acres : .68 Year Built .• Bathrooms Lot SqFt : 29,620 EffYearBlt .• Heat Method Bsm Fin SqFt Floor Cover . Pool Bsm Unfin SqFt : Foundation . Appliances Bsm Low SqFt Roof Shape • Dishwasher Bldg SqFt Roof Matl .• Hood Fan 1st Flr SqFt InteriorMat . Deck Upper Flr SqFt : Paving Matl . Garage Type Porch SqFt Const Type . Garage SF Attic SqFt Ext Finish . Deck SqFt . This title information has been furnished,without charge,in conformance with the guidelines approved by the State of Oregon Insurance Commissioner. The Insurance Division cautions intermediaries that this service is designed to benefit the ultimate insureds. Indiscriminate use only benefiting intermediaries will not be permitted. Said services may be discontinued. No liability is assumed for any errors in this report. ---- u�.;,::z:..;;;. _,��•. �;�,"•�„-•:�i::.�..,ri�• KIT"i�9 f�,'+"�'.:�.n'%'"� 4T,•' S � 7?f$�-. .i r. • , _—________� -.,, ..< ._m.tiiias •JiY _r_""'Y'`'.li�ta ;-i _`r.. i•„_._. P'1/0 Fidelity National Title Company of Oregon ` . 92031616 •1• STATUTORY SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED Washington County fIN_ . Ilndlvldud or Corporate) r REVEREND JAMES D. WIEK also known as JAMES D. WIEK ::,:" grantor,conveys and specifically warrants to: iggion Dr,,,QICERMAN AND JAMES E. WATHEY, as tenants in common " gr antee,the following described real property,free and clear of encumbrances created or suffered by the grantor except as specifically set forth herein,situated in the County of Washington ,State of Oregon, to wit: ._.04 ct (See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof) _ .-7 1%1 • . C• � m r{ This deed is being given in fulfillment of that certain Real Estate Contract r'( recorded March 18, 1985 as Fee No. 85009368, records of Washington County, Oregon :d and any warranties herein apply only as of date of said Contract. „ g J Q - .._ '2' - O 4ZZ" THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF p APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT THE —.-.. = PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY --- _'-- PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES. - ----- THE TRUE AND ACTUAL CONSIDERATION FOR THIS CONVEYANCE IS 5100,000.00 —• ...._.._.. .......__..............................._............^••..-......... ......__......_ (See ORS 93.030) Dated this.j3,_.day of April .199Z...; r c� ; _- REVEREND JAMES D. WIEK . "s` ---._ 111..rr72.4al) :_t , - iiy •u, __= STATE OF OREGON, ) STATE OF OREGON,County al In. ' County of iMultnomah == April .. 1g 92 Personally appeared• and _ -__,I=.--1-.: _ oho, being duly :rain, =-° - Personally appeared the above named ---— Reverend James D. Wiek each for himself and not one for the other,did say that the lame,is the =_ _— ' ,-. president and that the latter Is the ='.`- secretory of .a corporation.•••`• - and%ackaotrlodged the loregoing insfru- end that the.eel allised to the foregoing instrument is the corporate,Cal I�TAt .-..`• of said corporation and that said Instrument teas signed and sealed in be- "- nl.pT.is pt l.I..I H•:..};.; ' � _� _�- r Ho.•"•- ° ce 'r"M r?it=� PARCEL VI: g"_ • 864INNINO at an iron pipe marking the Northwest corner of Lot 35 of FAUN° CREEK ACRE =_ TRACT, a duly recorded plat of Washington County, Oregon; and running thence South 0°02.40' East 130.37 feet along the Easterly boundary line of said Lot 35 to an iron rod said iron rod marking the true point of beginning of this deecription; thence ___ cJ continuing South 0°02.40• East 122.78 feet to an iron pipe marking the Southeast corn: == .ErSL of said Lot 35S thence South 89°46'10' West 241.67 feet along the Southerly bounder !- line of said Lot 35, to an iron rod; thence North 0°13.50" West 122.78 feet to an iro: —`: rod; thence North 89°46'10' Snot 242.07 feet to the true point of beginning of this .,..__: 'T dascript ion.-..... ti = _ PARCEL VII: SEOINNINO et an iron pipe'on the Southwest corner of Lot .35, plet'of FANNO CREEK ACRE - TRACTS, a registered plat of Waehington.County, Oregon, said ,point of beginning also —___ being on the Easterly right of way of the S P and S Railroad right of way; thence from -- _ said point of beginning North 89°46'10" Eaet 170.99 feet along the South line of Lot 35. of °aid plat to an iron rod; thence North 0°13'50" Weat 122.78 feet to an iron rod. - thence South 89°46'10" West 134.09 feet to a point on the Easterly right of way of the I P and 8 Railway; thence along the arc of a curve 128.36 feet, central angle 4°56'40", ••radiva•1487.40 feet, chord beare.8outh.16°30400" Weat 128.25 feet, and eaLd Eaeterl; =—_ - ___: • right of way to.the Southwest corner of said Lot Lot and point of beginning, Washington _.L7.::: County, Oregon. pp' —' STATE OF OREGON i mot, J SS County o1 Weshtngtse . ±- or of Assessment ` Jerry R.Hansom/IN and�'axatl°n fX•ja��C! order ocerrtify f ''`' ="' !,eYancea 1or� d 4e 'n9 3' -- = receWte�d O " rds o saki f. .'^a'. r of . ....t ......, _...... i;\tigq..--.,,,i0:,..1..„gei .., ",, , 4..„.:.."4, ..../4.--• app r = Doc 42031816 �y Rect: 76897 38.00 g;; =. 8 a t.: 05/11/1992 01:59:1OPH } 11 -vv^ i `(41 J3 • .__=.r.�,..iawa_r-"'� } :p. T• Q�5ia. �•�'! g!F}//-,--7 .,� Y;•''n.,`i`x`y,7 ,, 3'••kko �; it;;,:' i : __-- ..�^� 4~ t_{ •� •rtin:lt�•:" - '� ar. _ t v-• _ �..FFF y mss... �«- �'yY.�. -V i .3'k'� 1''?L.._ ..air, ti: �,... j ftr,` .rF �:17:-.1 �.'',t:tai,•";"{'fir;r .cca,,/�. --C, . . •5��., a: }�).� -%.. u,..'•• .t_r ,-cL' ',1 2' j, !v..-' r i••_ 'n. a••u' l'LC' dY�ja ' 2 -.y. r,.; Y w"�L. --__c.':/,tar^',• •.'y�` i ..tom 4{ R ^1•,: .k_•iv+'is•.,a�.. t :u�i.", _.µ ,�.�..�4'bY� l.;� -- - - k{:�" .,.., Zrr 3';,•, ce,- 1'f ei•-,,,, �]y Y..:. i,v , �' _ura:vv,+'..� �t' .,. .:}• '?t• ':.i' !. :-1 (,-�..:s.'S i•: {�,y T���yd. �*,:�•r;��,,i"i-Mr'[S.•..�.f,7 e?,°, --.----,` '� .;f,^=:�"r.1;;;;;:-jiSr` 1411.• •-47xi4Y ;*; .�• .,14,�s•s3,r 2Va 'r�`iy f eg 4q7,;.R,1;�%1i;?�':� :---- " - - t,•: i:,:�c r z,• e i. _�r J 54r.�3' 3c,� i►� ° .``1 r• �S,.0 i _...,. '- � �__ .:.o-. 'b,(p 1,1 i,,•u; ,,,t'ii.- ,, V.�3 I� ,t','ti.=,:` .:at�z •-.. , :ta:r4c. {;�_ +, ..i;Y n'.t''i..Sr. '•1 _'Z3r;�a''.:y .:t'l � 1't: •�A�..a'•??'�•-'.S`;;,N� ,/� =�Li�:,=°-----_ _= .rl.E.`,^.`�i,4.F.!,ai'1 �•.c,,.-•!.. r :,.., sir; .F:R:' -1:-e..'ti...: r.' Lirtl' -.• "ti �+;.,.t .F."`•it�Y •�,,� 1-It'. -1..t Y om""' o" :j 'tA 41%,, r- :: - _•w ^�.'-,'F::_°•`',''s'`4�9+tlN� . '�."t' � i ':j,C- F�S•••2+� s` .. / 1-,^.. ---- ---!.: 1- �..A.�.,:i 1?-4, E ' ''' :J-' ';gam, w' r .-_(S -_- -_._ _...r-- -._.. i a yam. . _ �;iox•�v c. :7 -__ ——-•-- • -—q-4.....,.---' ,---5;;--,7-7177--1-11--71; 17_, _- -"'^'""�,=� �4M?l:yi'-T'S�v�, y(� 7��y:�_?..�_'.1ai•R"�-__: :-. _ .. - --_- a' K ., +' IiSK7.i r., '� a u_ -�'.R,..1,F1,„-- .�. •• v e '9,aye~,?..,err R_-. _-_ .,rM._-ia !'� - •. �' t`1- Qt4,• '1 y,,..??.::t.=__:sueY -.. - _- :- rrs_T.�I.n%Y•.v 'i'•.. �i1`j,. ';1 VR,V -i-i?-^ . ;.-[::,w. r...., -„•sue-.'-.�'F.:s,'ti'.;r4..i_.7f";..i.q...';r.°... ,- _.a,::a,::-�.,:;,•�.:.;.. ''+'}._:.. _.q_.".•, ..�_.v l�..:.:....J�. .I. .•....,- ..'. =-a-�zs;=•:.0.w,.,I,ttit,t• :f vw•, "'r.-' •as 'v{2�s. ` i� ,J-. vmT- :. - - ,y1 .: ' :hr:; 5 ;^•Y'1;'u'i'';^i• . ._-)L,. -.� _.—. $,f AME .j 1 4 w ',,f -2- rr First A ican Title Insurance 0mpany of Oregon Washington (OR) Prepared For: Prepared By: Customer Service Department 1700 SW Fourth Avenue - Portland, Oregon 97201-5512 Phone: (503) 222-3651 Fax: (503) 790-7872 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Owner : Akerman Richard D Ref Parcel Number : 2S112DC 01200 CoOwner : Wathey James E T: 02S R: 01W S: 12 Q: 251 Site Address : *no Site Address* Parcel Number : R0513411 Mail Address : 12031 SW Breyman Ave Portland Or 97219 Map Number . Telephone : Owner: Tenant: County :Washington(OR) SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION Transferred : 05/11/1992 Loan Amount . Document# : 31816 Lender . Sale Price Loan Type .• Deed Type Interest Rate %Owned : 100 Vesting Type . PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION Map Page& Grid MktLand : $88,120 Census : Tract: Block: MktStructure : $25,380 Subdivision/Plat : Fanno Creek MktOther . Neighborhood Cd :YI5 Mkt Total : $113,500 Land Use : 2312 Misc,Non-mfg,Improvement,Ind Zone M50 Assd Total : $74,300 Legal : FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS, LOT PT 35, %Improved : 22 : ACRES .34 04-05 Taxes : $1,211.85 . Exempt Amount : Exempt Type . Levy Code : 02374 Millage Rate : 16.3101 PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS Bedrooms Lot Acres : .34 Year Built .• Bathrooms Lot SqFt : 14,810 EffYearBlt . Heat Method Bsm Fin SqFt Floor Cover . Pool Bsm Unfin SqFt : Foundation . Appliances Bsm Low SqFt Roof Shape .• Dishwasher Bldg SqFt Roof Matl .• Hood Fan 1st Flr SqFt InteriorMat . Deck Upper Flr SqFt : Paving Matl . Garage Type Porch SqFt Const Type . Garage SF Attic SqFt Ext Finish • Deck SqFt .• This title information has been furnished,without charge,in conformance with the guidelines approved by the State of Oregon Insurance Commissioner. The Insurance Division cautions intermediaries that this service is designed to benefit the ultimate insureds. Indiscriminate use only benefiting intermediaries will not be permitted. Said services may be discontinued. No liability is assumed for any errors in this report. ___ tiNT :n s..e.•..fa:7 .•,ntA�.•uh-.•vY••M .,ttii; 7,T1••e:nar :Leh ,{a,r • 1• x".16' —. No Fidelity National Title Company of Oregon - 92031816 �..\` STATUTORY SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED Washington 1!V_ • Ilndlvldud or Cerporstal REVEREND JAMES D. WIEK also known as JAMES D. WIEK grantor,conveys and specifically warrants to: ';:. glow D. AyERMAN AND JAMES E. WATHEY, as tenants in common Ai .;tai ,,= grantee,the following described real property,free and clear of t"' encumbrances created or suffered by the grantor except as specifically set forth herein,situated in the County •7 of Washington ,State of Oregon, to wit: -- (See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof) __ . c m r{ This deed is being given in fulfillment of that certain Real Estate Contract -----1 H recorded March 18, 1985 as Fee No. 85009368, records of Washington County, Oregon :A and any warranties herein apply only as of date of said Contract. _, g J - d -..._•• _ z., 4ZZ" THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF =, APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT THE --- -- = PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY •_'-- PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES. — _= THE TRUE AND ACTUAL CONSIDERATION FOR THIS CONVEYANCE IS 5100x000.00 ..... .,.•............_..._........... ........__............_.._......_ (See ORS 93.030) — Dated this. ,_day of April 1992 . rt ..falls a REVEREND J.P.Ine..&:te C.1: 444 e_-_-_.,,....e...-• JAMES D. WIEK •— .ibeisc STATE OF OREGON, ) STATE OF OREGON,County of 1 Si. $-'="��:: Multnomah 3 et' 19 —— — Ceunty of i ••.� April J IP 92 Personally appeared and __ —_- -'— who, being duly :won,, =— _ Personally appeared the above named -- Reverend James D. Wiek each for himself and not one for the other,did say that the bernt,,is the -- __ '��.�, �.' • president and that the letter is the ^-'- - •"� secretory of • ..: a roek'csrfod ed the Iwc sin rmuu, a corporation, uxzwi: + f g g and that the seal&Weed to the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal niq i.ia : •. of said corporation and that said Instrument nag signed and sealed in be• 1� (-i�l H.:-,:r.,,---voluntary act and deed. E . •t...,l t.•,;'.?, ..:.,,-r. hall of geld corporation by authority at its board of directors;and each at rii:=�.i-: then)acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. 1�'a��.' II•:aaic>�w •_—_ tr-l•'':'��elarUril':. Before me: • ieo :T _ .fRFF.1CO.li-1�":0Ty .. . ."- • .... (OFFICIAL to mst '.t-r.,"st0.1: .;, t•r i.::>; . ' SEAL) Li .I1:....Notaig„Fublld.tdrr.Orearin Notary Public for Oregon w. C":,6 fM?eommisilon'eipires: 10-31-92 My conlrniulon expires: r�?--°�` J = — Reverend James D. Wiek STATE OF OREGON. -,...t en,.ucecue County of Richard Akerman 1 certify that the within instru- Jemes Wathey • ment was received for record on the day of 19 ----- • ■Mt ePa.aoegg, roe at • o'Cloth,,Ill.,and recorded Alin/11141114)Sabha lal PSCaeoCs-•uaC in book/reel/volume No. on -- Northwest Landscape Industries page or as document/fee/file/ -- 16075 SW Upper Boopea_�Ferry Rd. Instrument/microfilm No. , Tigard, OR 97224 Record of Deeds of said county. hart.■east..a,. Witness my hand and seal of Voila drat b,aunNa SO fat 11/11 enll AO be teal I.nu laming.dann. County affixed. ......._,,..— By Deputy NA.C..Oaatae,n► 9N104-0014 c .c ..f. _w4-,,,,p:-. 6y,l :1•` �j:. .:?,.... :5..:4;.�a r1t4,y�_.+*'2A.7 •.;T:9;IP � lei:."A*Tit _ .i ..�..� ..y:i =: ii`t:�.:`.°:^�r"'"S='S7i'�.�_ • nar� snf-.r.•,v.•w-'m.E�55tFMt�i,L --;%+'" -'.-;:-_-c',Gli. 'Q:ti_c-';1... ':•C�;� ) h''•-'.:y"� "'+i: c_'may :.:___�__ . - rte i •... 2 ` f:.>..._._ • t.,. _• -` PARCEL. VI• '~' BEGINNING at an iron pipe marking the Northeast corner of Lot 35 of ',RENO CREEK ACRE PP.,--- TRACT, a duly recorded plat of Washington County, Oregon; and running thence South 0°02'40• East 130.37 feet along the Easterly boundary line of said Lot 35 to an iron rod - said iron rod marking the true point of beginning of this description; thence -_ c1 continuing South 0°02'40• East 122.78 feet to an iron pipe marking the Southeast corner !_� of said Lot 35; thence South 89°46'10" West 241.67 feet along the Southerly bounder. .7— -. line of said Lot 35, to an iron rod; thence North 0°13.50" Heat 122.78 feet to an ire: -- rod; thence North 89°46'10' East 242.07 feet to the true point of beginning of this --.? .description. = _ PARCEL Inn -- BEGINNING at an iron pipe on the Southwest corner of Lot '35, plet'of FANNO CREEK ACRE __-_ TRACTS, a registered plat of Washington County, Oregon, said .point of '• beginning also ---- --� being on the Easterly right of way of the S P and S Railroad right of way; thence from -- _ said point of beginning North 89°46.10• Eaet 170.99 feet along the south line of Lot 35. -z.....- of said plat to an iron rode thence North 0013,50" Weat 122.78 feet to an iron rod. - thence South 89°46'10" Weat 134.09 feet to a point on the 8aoterly right of way of the t P and 8 Railway; thence along the arc of a curve 128.36 feet, central angle 4°56.40", _ •-radius.1487.40 feet, chord bears-South 16°30.00" Weat 128.25• feet, and meld Raster/4 • sight of way to-the Southwest corner of said Lot 35 and point of beginning, Washington _, _ County, Oregon. -. --.-_" STATE OF OREGON ES __• >, J ss J -_ - County of Washington '•-r: _rz z i Jewry R.Hanscrt,Dire a of re of lion tyg •-T' vegan es tot�p cLtlrilYd 9B n8 1-ti._ .. - that the rd X01 in. • said f./c'"a` of SW ` 1 y/V.� '-rt',''fir`+ "'*i "4 COUNS.0 Doc 92031616 38.00 i '1 Rect: 76897 '; .=.7..:.-.. .-= G1� • 05/11/1992 01:59:1OPM : 0. —74...4 IP ....-%;:z7.- - i."';!. ":w. %.,:21,•,Li"-�?'i.". �.'.4SF:e4 ..�" .• •'i\�'(,.•:.r�.. 4.r '•- i,, • ".j,..g., l'i•' .. 1.-72,'"...':,v•••" - , �:,: �;d 1r, ,,•,..r t:::i 1.�;'`tom.'''"#,: ^� ss�b•,?i�r.'°•, ',..raol,uZ'.+:'�:.:1,st I • _ "e : i_. u{ •-_ -` `% 4,c �.y4•<;,.,' _ of t '7-. 'a' 7..E14I �.... Slv..,'5,...�:,,.: -Yr._. ; y,,. f ,,,,,?t'.:Y,'i•,• ---,5-.=_i-.-:==,;.,=� r� ,:i .v:' .•rik �lai••ri;y,'i7,'�.L�'+.•'...���y •TI4 ''.a•N�r�� ',+�;`:,1.,,,' �'-'��L^ rif_..'����•I .:.,e,...• .+ -- t w;,, :,,,V, (:, a4,4.v:`4+).✓.\.rp Y' - 7. tf ,-� ' _e•: ----- - --- .t^°rK-\:�,.' •: :C•' -In.,w',:,g442,4,Y +::eiv,--:.:-;'...,.Y,-.;;;J,�.Y;z•,�^ :4•..- y- e,r, itt -;6,.,:, k,t._+`zi,s:. r ._--.__--'____ H ?..C' .1. `'f'r t" 'y.�c;�aiic:.:y..i•r •.ar !'cr,.,dP dot,<v 7-74,114:e-t-,-,,i...11,74%,' __ =r i_,:r,t, :-". ' :,1 i s ..tK,•,.41 .3ti*.X'.{v x.. 1t . -A .,,V.�,f•_%"-�i;. tw..,_._._ - r;O'r' �tC• ,;j•. r�.'± ,.r�*76.; i,.ia. •.4-�- i�'.`�:-�.�:ST..:.. 3Y.'�`.�e. : .-�,...:__—_ — —_— }„4 t5?- v;,,T, , '.�lr d 2,e S ,,AF,e to c.l x!. '; v- -_. -'• � V . :0:" :. �/ � 1 .':j; :1• 'lL 7� I,. �.1��'j• '.'r'., .�;: :••'f:i:,;.� �-- -- — ____.-------—.:'1'3'11c��{`ti�i'M:^.t�•t-Y ::L:::0 •-”'` . o 4 •..;t 7s::�4'-.::? • : "^e.a;,;r•t,�../,=:: �-li, _---- _ ,.cr-:?.u .ti�G .�:`t4'; ' y t • � : > �tsi,- �' c!"� ?-,; r.=�� ' 3 0 )' Y a., .4=3, ? r- -C6 : .�4�1 7 _ __`r : vimSy • >::rte —=•--- ' . y _ ... r a .. j--r---===� ._ - - ;. ;:a f. ,. •- — - �. -„_-s+�T:RT'1•^v .n:P.lw T4_T\YL14i1�.'JF{M!G! �-!?-�!.':..7•di'1^n way. +,...�'.•..�..._ _............�rr-i r., 'ii• t.::,"-.,.i!Yyw.- .�."_'ti b�J'.` - _;.O:ij.,,.-+iYV:••, -.enact-- ,'i.�• T. 'r- ::1C:',"'_ :f: ..: • :acrdrt—v■...:..i=- �∎a,—.car n '- : .s.. ,u..i..:�,. ei,saa.e+.r.- S A M E R 1 4, „ a ,-:=1"s"''''''''---, 1' First An ican Title Insurance Ompany of Oregon �.� ms .` Washington(OR) Prepared For: Prepared By Customer Service Department 1700 SW Fourth Avenue - Portland, Oregon 97201-5512 Phone: (503)222-3651 Fax: (503)790-7872 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Owner : Larusso Concrete Company Inc Ref Parcel Number : 2S 112DC 01300 CoOwner T: 02S R: 01W S: 12 Q: 251 Site Address : 15930 SW 74th Ave Tigard 97224 Parcel Number : R0513402 Mail Address : 15930 SW 74th Ave Tigard Or 97224 Map Number . Telephone : Owner: Tenant: County :Washington(OR) SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION Transferred : 04/25/2000 Loan Amount : $210,000 Document# : 32753 Lender : Wells Fargo Bank Sale Price : $305,000 Loan Type : Construction Deed Type :Warranty Interest Rate : Fixed Owned : 100 Vesting Type : Corporation PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION Map Page&Grid : 655 G7 MktLand : $161,690 Census : Tract: 308.04 Block: 3 MktStructure : $149,050 Subdivision/Plat : Fanno Creek Mkt Other . Neighborhood Cd : YI5 Mkt Total : $310,740 Land Use : 2312 Misc,Non-mfg,Improvement,Ind Zone MS0 Assd Total : $186,170 Legal : FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS, LOT PT 35, %Improved : 48 : ACRES .99 04-05 Taxes : $3,036.43 Exempt Amount : Exempt Type . Levy Code : 02374 Millage Rate : 16.3101 PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS • Bedrooms Lot Acres : .99 Year Built . Bathrooms Lot SqFt : 43,124 EffYearBlt . • Heat Method Bsm Fin SqFt Floor Cover . Pool Bsm Unfin SqFt : Foundation . • Appliances Bsm Low SqFt Roof Shape . • Dishwasher Bldg SgFt Roof Matl . Hood Fan 1st Fir SqFt InteriorMat . Deck Upper Fir SqFt : Paving Matl . Garage Type Porch SqFt Const Type Garage SF Attic SqFt Ext Finish . • Deck SqFt . This title information has been furnished,without charge,in conformance with the guidelines approved by the State of Oregon Insurance Commissioner. The Insurance Division cautions intermediaries that this service is designed to benefit the ultimate insureds. Indiscriminate use only benefiting intermediaries will not be permitted. Said services may be discontinued. No liability is assumed for any errors in this report. I O R Rr�lAo REQUESTE. IP F^. FLUTY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY OF OREGON C ( STATE OF OREGON } SS GRANTOR'S NAME County of Washington Brundage-Bone Concrete Pumping, Inc, /T� I,��y; , , of GRANTEE'S NAME • Cderk to ^' '� •°r�", ,1, that LaRusso Concrete Company, Inc. : the WI r,•-1•••=t,;;;u _:ti,\••\,f said A i and r=: - ��k ... Yl ell SEND TAX STATEMENTS TO: county '"�'S u �, La Russo Concrete Company, Inc. I ; i%.!,..,.e. • 9916 Reiner Ave. S. `,. `�}�,=� Seattle,WA 99118 - Ati . • of -i!fa': axatlon.Ex- `vf/,'i',.~ark AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: LaRusso Concrete Company,Inc. Doc : 2000032753 9916 Ratner Ave.S. Sect: 253467 332.00 Seattle.WA 99118 04/25/2000 03:26:46pat STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED Brundage•Bone Concrete Pumping,Inc.,a Colorado Corporation, Grantor,conveys and warrants to LaRusso Concrete Company,Inc.,a Colorado Corporation,Grantee,the following described real property,free and clear of encumbrances except as specifically set forth below,situated in the County of Washington, State of Oregon, r SEE EXHIBIT ONE ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF g Subject to and excepting: City liens in favor of the City of Tigard-none as of the date of closing; Easement granted to Unified Sewerage Agency p of Washington County recorded Novmeber 15, 1977, Book 1216,Page 696. z g THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF w APPUCABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT THE O PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY Er— PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. • THE TRUE AND ACTUAL CONSIDERATION FOR THIS CONVEYANCE IS $305,000.00 (See ORS 93.030) DATED: April 20,2000 Brundage-Bone Concrete Pumping,Inc.,a Corporation corporation By 4 ...„.1 1�a..� S , )0 By: '�� A�� 4 WASHINGTON COUNTY By' —_ „•:a. REAL PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX - ''". . z 3o5.Oo oq-as-o0 FEE PAID DATE STATE OF ,.f1A COUNTY OF "I/Mr This ins• e n�was acknowledged before me on i Q�\SliLN4..�t• -du S by L' I., 4 l ' , ;u a' .ii L. ;.0: tIOTA/?y mt— as P2tf1/e./ ` itub SPe T }I. i ° 0: / r PUBLIC - ;.of �//DY AVE 04/ PE fa//1P UG,.117C i :it I 'o 02 :. eifi���ii2 /friil� NOTARY PUBLIC FOR,PJ At fl.A ��;.�W"S . MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: /U-d''61 I -a FORD-313 Mow 2/es1 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED • • Escrow N410-17144- 'flysr No.000171 • EXHIBIT ONE Beginning at an Iron pipe marking the Northeast corner of Lot 36,FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS,a duly recorded plat in the City of Tigard,Washington County,Oregon,and running thence South 89°46'10'West 348.66 feet along the Northerly boundary line of said Lot 35 to an intersection with the Easterly right of way line of the S.P. &S.Railroad; a thence along said right of way line on a 1487.40 foot radius curve to the right(the long chord of which bears South 11°54'10" West 133.35 feet) a distance of 133.38 feet along the arc to a point; thence North 89°48'10' East 376.16 feet to an intersection with the Easterly boundary line of said Lot 35; thence North 0°02'40"West 130.37 feet along said Easterly boundary line to the point of beginning. • • 5 t A M E R f 410 • -4 :. ,c1., First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon _.. rS An assumed business name of TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON This map is provided as a convenience in locating property First American Title Insurance Company assumes no liability for any variations as may be disclosed by an actual survey Reference Parcel Number 2S 112DC 01300 . , Y\ / \ OC° Cli ^ CO • ` i \i CO r- MU / `\ , \ Cr • 6 \ , • , \ ^ , \ K \, � �,>\` , • •; 4-.�5 \\\\\\\\\\\\\in i ` />` , , > co `' L 1300 "u� co ci , • " .99 AC �� , � C3 *: r. m 35 NN ' \ • lied-— r \ / 134.09 242.07 \. F__ 708' __� ;. f cN ' N 0 , \ Ct CO 1200 N iio CO . .34 AC Ir. .68 A .- 57.8, jig 170,99 • 241,67 - • S1 AMER, 0 •• 4 � f�i First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon -� � ?�_:#: `` ::=- An assumed business name of TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON This map is provided as a convenience in locating property First American Title Insurance Company assumes no liability for any variations as may be disclosed by an actual survey Reference Parcel Number 2S 112DC 01300 - li'�",'• tiS'dk,• ,.•�.,•, r, •.*;r ,t' r Y:: ),,. i`: y* �.: ,,fir. PC i<" �b •x•••r •ri�`r;' \ :i'• Y' ''x'•k"�'"•' :' a .J'r. ". ". .. �' i 'x; •rte- - ,"-,T2 rr".44.:4' ' L::ri 0 — �' SW, KABLE LANE ..„7-,..',.....%,:-',„.:>„• ; ; 'S I ,:4..),"..,:,:„.:•:,,..,,-r. • l, •^' ,• _ ' '';rrJ .. N . 'r,' • ,i '•glq> ▪:. . • :.• 'F ,001 7 000 i 7 W r '. ^.:4;rY J L, r 'X W J :1,;'),".:r'n . /r:.' .6`• ..,. n \ I° \ 'Q `.,, ,, SW1/4SE1I45 i 1111' Y • ," '' —e ro ow = (' • •6c� Vr ) �iqq ' .t•O♦ f : i'f,.•"`J��r,'�'f,Y..::Cr�•' �. 2; uw W .r' r, `'�\''u �"�%i%;i 47 i0.dW:77.4!IR1MS'.,,, ..,.c tt Q .. �i fl 1 le..• .•-\•-%•' 'FV�Q1:,: :! ;;\ ' .,- \� ' .1i >_.:A 44.i i=• ` ' ,� - f;•',4'4,`•,:•*^ Old, ::::,..::,.-:::::f;,...,:,,,::::-::, ' t . z`h- .., "-.'' i..9✓"• ,_ :r'_ , ::'r.J;/ :: ";�•, •: 'gyp r '''r r O - YKihJ4 :'a. • -n ',O J :;0 C' '•" �8. u ",'':::;<.,0;.t."'''.,:":-:':.‘',K.,': ': • (,:.Yr 1.. I I.,.c owro :yr• �.... '+ ,i'c; •',v;-' :T: '•'a:" •':, uoo a nor♦ , —_ :, ;:t m: ;d ,, — • a --- c.ras JI .aa.� ..�. PLOT D, ;-. ;,....�_ �-r FORA E -i. r,,' _ >,>-_` i� U , E 17 C re..raa.-e :l13e,i. rrwar.. •� bM =�1.1s 2S 1 12DC 4s.t AME ,RIC First An ican Title Insurance •mpany of Oregon S.Y Washington(OR) Prepared For: Prepared By Customer Service Department 1700 SW Fourth Avenue - Portland,Oregon 97201-5512 Phone: (503)222-3651 Fax: (503) 790-7872 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Owner : Akerman Richard D Ref Parcel Number : 2S 113AB 00200 CoOwner : Wathey James E T: 02S R: 01W S: 13 Q: 253 Site Address : 16045 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd Tigard 97224 Parcel Number : R0513180 Mail Address : 12031 SW Breyman Ave Portland Or 97219 Map Number . Telephone : Owner: Tenant: County :Washington(OR) SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION Transferred : 11/14/1991 Loan Amount . Document# : 63372 Lender . • Sale Price : $285,000 Loan Type . Deed Type : Warranty Interest Rate . %Owned : 100 Vesting Type : Tenants In Comm PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION Map Page&Grid : 685 G1 MktLand : $170,730 Census : Tract: 308.04 Block: 3 Mkt Structure : $452,250 Subdivision/Plat : Fanno Creek Mkt Other . Neighborhood Cd : YI5 Mkt Total : $622,980 Land Use : 2312 Misc,Non-mfg,Improvement,Ind Zone MSO Assd Total : $297,630 Legal : FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS, LOT PTS 38 %Improved : 73 : &39, ACRES .56, SEE USA LIEN 04-05 Taxes : $4,974.01 : DOCKET Exempt Amount : Exempt Type . Levy Code : 02374 Millage Rate : 16.3101 PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS . • Bedrooms Lot Acres : .56 Year Built . Bathrooms Lot SqFt : 24,393 EffYearBlt . • Heat Method Bsm Fin SqFt Floor Cover . Pool Bsm Unfin SqFt Foundation • Appliances Bsm Low SqFt Roof Shape . • Dishwasher Bldg SqFt Roof Matl Hood Fan 1st Flr SqFt InteriorMat Deck Upper Flr SqFt : Paving Matl . Garage Type Porch SqFt Const Type Garage SF Attic SqFt Ext Finish • Deck SqFt . This title information has been furnished,without charge,in conformance with the guidelines approved by the State of Oregon Insurance Commissioner. The Insurance Division cautions intermediaries that this service is designed to benefit the ultimate insureds. Indiscriminate use only benefiting intermediaries will not be permitted. Said services may be discontinued. No liability is assumed for any errors in this report. .:rte 1 . ;�-:: . s 5'• • _S A MCX/ OC •�ui17�: 91063372 rikuxt: . r;: STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED '^•'•- -- v,► ;�: Lam. :.:�.a...�.� ::: .::: W-Alt PETROLEUM AND WELDING SUPPLY, INC an Oreson corporation ��y� an WATT ;IMI�'-�7r•' E DING SUPPLY, INC., en Oreton cos oration ``'0"14:%, D Grantor, tc;:z re conveys and warrcntsto RICHARD D. AXERHAN AND JAMES E. WATHEY. AS TENANTS > CO O{T izP ,Grantee, . •,!; ,. the following described real property free of liens and encumbrances,except as specifically set forth herein: ? . SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" vw ,W mum two ey "' 4p tura American Title Insurance Compmy 010re� �' •`,'.% 11 ?� Na. r7(22-1-, — r° f rt V ::r`1.4 sJ This property Is free of liens and encumbrances,EXCEPT:Statutory powers and amaessments ,of Unified ' l_ Sewerage Agency, tr THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN :`::tit,.. • VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS.BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING : :. THIS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES. The true consideration for this conveyance is S 285.000.00 (Here comply with the requirements of ORS 910302 %1I ...'. .• Dated this l3 day of November 19-91 l` 1 WATT PETROLEUM AND WELDING SUPPLY, INC. �� .—�.` �;-"JIA VEN E. A ; ..LE • HO ir R -- • STATE OF OREGON County of MULTNOMAH _)5s. ,, ' On this /3 clay of November ,/y 91 ,before me appeared STEVEN E. WATT :q•.� { . and both to me onal ;;Y""� ,' P� 11' • lotown,who being duty swam,did say that he,the said STEVEN E. WATT 1:.. U the President,and he,the said is the "}'•'`'""' Secretary of WATT PETROLEUM AND WELDING SUPPLY, INC. the wiiltf i t,Ip1'►1ed,Cbgioiation, and that the seal afford to said instrument is the corporate seal of said Corporation,and `--'',':. • thats�ard'[iif 1 trsrtji A[••war signed and sealed in behalf of said Corporation by authority of its Board of Director. and • S 'ST = and • saldttstrtiment to E e acknowledge :. tJt /rat act and deed of Corporation. ti :T.Ji)1-gESTl14o y14 WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year last above `` '•` wib,titu. '.' 3 L i..: .- ;-�' (tI()C7(/YL(�c) (/GZ �k, Notary Public or Oregon. My Commission expires 1)(I 41 3 f Ft Title Order No. 705219 .• • • Escrow No. 9111034 THIS SPACE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE .fiE After recording return to: ••;,e1 ' 'e RICHARD AKERMAN :e 1IASHINGTON COUNTY .'•'i J3 !{. C/o NORTHWEST LANDSCAPE 16075 S.W. *+ ii: REAL PROPERrr TRANSFER TAX :4�% '�1 TIAGRD, OR 97224 -'r 1! ��� e y?� Ail Name,Address.ap , -°-� .11.1%-‘4 t ,.;,�:. Until a change Is requested all lax statements snail be sans • to Co DOwing address. ;.::. o C/O NORTHWEST _ ' -:.'i?';� LANDSCAPE 16075 S.W. TIAORD• OR 97224 ' Name,Address,Zp J / •� + moire i ��'• _. • :' � ' F-1- a t ..,t :/ S iti .,/f•'!,:.G'� ° �'�s '1 :: ram Vi is•---..... 415:.; ' Order No.705219 1:40...'1'. 1 7CFIIBIT'A' M,„` ,.- .;;;• (;fi t., A tract of land located In Lots 38 and 39 of the FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS,In the City of Tigard,County :.:±...-.-‘7,,,.... ;•:;1•;,i_:. of Washington and State of Oregon,more particularly described as follows: Li'Ijt x}.1,•� Beginning at the Southwest corner of Lot 39,of said FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS;thence North 0•02'40" 'irF.,' - West 35.00 feet along the Westerly line of aald Lot 39;thence North 89'49'20'East 57.94 feet;thence South ;?.;r, >•:• 44'47'35' East 203.02 feet to the Northwesterly rlght•of•way of S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road;thence "4.1;941:-.r •�' South 49.01'10'West 110.00 feet along the Westerly tight-of-way of said S.W.Upper Scones Ferry Road .*S '`� � to the Northeasterly corner of a tract of land conveyed to Lester L Bennett,at ux,by Deed recorded In Deed • `�e•`' Book 320,page 274,Deed Records of Washington County, Oregon;thence North 44'37'35'West 214.40 ',I.:„; �� feet along said Bennett Tract to the Northwesterly line of Lot 38,of said FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS; ,; thence North 48'01'10'East 44.01 feet along the Northwesterly line of said Lot 38 to the true point of l'•a,-. `.:.: beginning. .,1.J Y.•4'' ,;: :mr- i ;Sit.41, • I LJt2 '• I ' 'c.4,rr::.••• I '+..',.1. • fl'iP 'J•'.,i. • • STATE OF OREGON as County of Washington , : a -. I.Jerry R.Heneo Director of Assessment E._ _ _ - and TQ%ettan ana•("2-0-eo-nk.ofder of Can - — and Taxa for Bald eounry.'do here,*certify that is the within IrJelrtunerJt ot.wrltlJip:watt�ecelved `:; !• ,:, . end recorded�ntsookol records olaeld1counly. ..:•••,..-'•:."::, re:,• ' JlnY R Hanaoh 7D recIor o! M •,,_t:;!�. r a` Asaee�ment'end To�etllfi. Es• ;�,,;J;.; — ONICtoCOUnty.Qlar::c !Z ? . o\, `' t X44- �; 1J•'r:. o 5; �•.' Doc : 91063372 32 Rect.: 65636 `' '' 11/14/1991 11:00:53AM • r``.'};': ` •_is tt'� '•J}• ;:.•-:..........--_ . ., ::..... •.a-'•• - �>t lam.. r ▪t`- "t•'i •!,. 4 r ;sue'•.,. :ra. .�' � � 1. '::::1'...::'7,'-'1%..'••••:0,:•••••::/�.. '" - ,,,..... -41i.",:,-v'..,;•'�+` tom! �:' ••: TF a.• ,^r, _ �' •,�:'::.._/mot �. I.i• r ra'' r ••i J ,y �/ • ^ +7-t•-'�-•r wry %;�:�' - y.l s:'.::ti'F.,. :r..j J... ( :. .{ 4�'• ,',,,T.!....'',..'4:::, :•�i�::;t 'r....nom } %,44. -iv Z•. ,Y:': 7-0-,-J •vri,'t.:--r -.J..r. _ - ''f. .iii! .:'7e" :•: :.-.+.�•5+ /� ,. ,✓.. N )Z �4a , • 4.i. v7-•,.'L 1 Y ` . - Y x' &t4tZ; i.7' .•��. �t am:✓"n,�r.,- / t r. ▪ =i� J .��• rJ :� : t (; . ' w • ,L'7;: ^41. . a . v . 4S AMEg jC •' 'f F �+ First Am ican Title Insurance snip any of Oregon Washington(OR) Prepared For: Prepared By. Customer Service Department 1700 SW Fourth Avenue - Portland, Oregon 97201-5512 Phone: (503)222-3651 Fax: (503) 790-7872 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Owner : Akerman Rich&Wathey James E Ref Parcel Number : 2S 113AB 00300 Co Owner 7: 02S R: 01W S: 13 Q: 253 Site Address : 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd Tigard 97224 Parcel Number : R0513144 Mail Address : 12031 SW Breyman Ave Portland Or 97219 Map Number . Telephone : Owner: Tenant: County :Washington(OR) SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION Transferred : 05/11/1992 Loan Amount . Document# : 31817 Lender . • Sale Price Loan Type . Deed Type Interest Rate . %Owned Vesting Type . PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION Map Page& Grid : 685 G1 MktLand : $741,320 Census : Tract: 308.04 Block: 3 Mkt Structure : $626,710 Subdivision/Plat : Fanno Creek Mkt Other . Neighborhood Cd : YI5 MktTotal : $1,368,030 Land Use : 2312 Misc,Non-mfg,Improvement,Ind Zone M50 Assd Total : $1,039,220 Legal : FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS, LOT 36, %Improved : 46 : PTS 37-38, PLUS PT VACATED RD, 04-05 Taxes : $17,156.86 : ACRES 2.86, SEE CWS LIEN DOCKET Exempt Amount : Exempt Type . Levy Code : 02374 Millage Rate : 16.3101 PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS • Bedrooms Lot Acres : 2.86 Year Built . Bathrooms Lot SqFt : 124,581 EffYearBlt . • Heat Method Bsm Fin SqFt Floor Cover . Pool Bsm Unfin SqFt : Foundation . Appliances Bsm Low SqFt Roof Shape . Dishwasher Bldg SqFt Roof Matl Hood Fan 1st Flr SqFt InteriorMat . Deck Upper Flr SqFt : Paving Matl . Garage Type Porch SqFt Const Type . Garage SF Attic SgFt Ext Finish . • Deck SqFt . This title information has been furnished,without charge,in conformance with the guidelines approved by the State of Oregon Insurance Commissioner. The Insurance Division cautions intermediaries that this service is designed to benefit the ultimate insureds. Indiscriminate use only benefiting intermediaries will not be permitted. Said services may be discontinued. No liability is assumed for any errors in this report. -.--_::;, --ES _� - _;r! ':R_' :,_� � � ^:t :� : s •ys� yia.. t��" - . • • a. " Fidelity National Title Company of Oregon 92031317 _J vteshinatanoxel 0 STATUTORY SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED • John J. Tennant, Jr.(Indlehtud or Corporate) ••'' grantor,conueya and epectJieally warrants to: • lir Rrch Akerman and James E. Wathey, as tenants in common, each as to an undi'vi'ded'50% -- interest grantee,the following described real property,free and clear of ' encumbrances created or suffered by the grantor except oe epeciflcaliy eel forth herein,situated in the County • .T of Washington ,State of Oregon,to wit: rte: --- See Attached Legal as `: . ; ii._____... lica ri This deed given in fulfillment of that certain contract between John J. Tennant, Jr and Rich Akerman and James E. Wathey, recorded July 18, 1983 as Fee 83025653. laW g BENZEt — •_... _ Mt THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF _•� ra APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT THE - -�_.;„ = PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY e INEW PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES. _ sanlrc•e = THE TRUE AND ACTUAL CONSIDERATION FOR THIS CONVEYANCE IS S 665,642.32 EICRIMINZ. miticraffirm (See OM 93,030) — __, Dated:/6/.41le this,,,ze,,,,,day of April .19P.?..; .. �a Lt!?ef�4.. e:i '. hn J. iSant Jr.� "' ial'r«►o.l.11.11 e,rn4., •s -,,. __ • L filer , .: STATE OF OREGON, ) STATE OF OREGON,County at )se. � r'}`t r, Caunty of.i!`NA .........) ,fir. 4 ' April' /O ,19 92 Personally appeared and _ `•i' 'nt;•,.. who, being duty sworn. dS` •• Personally aPPeered Om above named �. (;x:.j each for himself and not one for the other,did say that the former is the "t{+^. �Ahn..�....7e nnacil~,J.r.. '-.),,w•.1 president and that the latter is the �} '' ) .: '— secretary of Nr`c . and acknowledged the lore going Immo• g A a eperpwoeian. '•%1`.71)'• a .— g e g and that the seal affixed to the lore oln instrument Is the corporate seal %.-.11,,e;:•.'.`'. j �"'•�->'��':-� ti-• r• y act and deed. at said corporation and that said instrument nos signed and sealed in be- k.' - — / :., OFFICIAL SEAL - / hall of said corporation by authority of its board of directors:and each of •.:c 4qF . i them acknowledged said Instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. 'a •`'' ,7—I. Before me: S'-: / ` •I Cfll�p,�Tr p /10i.tst44.4,� (OFFICIAL i:'Y!? i / v'T.� COM is ru8.o�2dN / r •'' 111361•••.? SEAL) • 4.40 _uu...se �••.•"-, Notary Public for Oregon ' - .My komno un-exp res: 1/2.2 if& My commission expires: .'v ..,. JOhn J. Tennant, Jr �' � STATE OF OREGON. .::,I County of ; y -1� Rich Akerman 8 James E. Wathey 1 certify that the within instru• r:; ; ment was received for record on the tip'''= ' DAC(...PYL0 day of ,19 r-•t-. a.Ae,RR■n•rR A.•o.POOL,. roe at,,•,,,,,,,•„o'clock„„ti/.,and recorded !:i I A14r m«aloe nn..N, .eee.aen•a,e in 6;20h/reel/volume No. on ':'. Fidelity National Title Page or as document/feel/71e/ instrument/micro tlm No. .. 1141 N.E. Division,,,,,,»,» _„_, • "'» Record of Deeds of county. Gresha�,,Or�gaO Witness my hand and seal of nA-R. i.e County affixed. �"�e' v«ao show a..a««L at t.e a«r.u.n AO I.r.a se lb t.u.w,.aemy ffix pa cltenge 1 rI;1- - - ...........11111.ite By Deputy ���, i LRl1O;0014 _ ' ... : . �..._.-,rte......1..•-, cw� • d–'°giEir'T. ' oti c� - . '” . , . • � . ... • d! Iva�Y �.f.7 cfih�.lii;-: L ii44,:nM.,..-.--i:°-„—;, i�" • • •,.,.;.=Fo {u-,:c: >;' 1 'r' PARCEL I I I t _ ;. Z:E-.�.-....�.r. ;i • That part of Lot 37, FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS, Washington County, Oregon, described as • follows: _-- BEGINNING at a point on the Southeast line of said lot which is North 49°01' 8sst 1B5 _____ feet from the most Southerly corner of said lot; running thanes North 49°01' East 110 • feet to the most Eaetorly corner of said lot; thence North 41°59' Neat 214.4 feet to the most Northerly corner of esid lot; thence south 49°01'10" Heat 118.10 fast along the I Northwest lira of said lot to the most Northerly corner of that tract conveyed to I� Harold W. eoyte et ux by deed recorded in Book 653, Page 240, Hashin --�--- Records/ thence South 44°37.35" East along the Northeast line of said Bo Yta tract 210.78 gton County =_�? feet to the point of beginning. = ___ PARCEL IVt _L . ----- part of Lot 38, PANNO CREEK ACRE TRACts, Hashington county, Oregon, described as follows: - ----_1 BEGINNING at an iron pipe at the Easterly corner of said Lot 37; thence North 49°O1' East 100 feet; thence North 41°59' Heat 214.4 feet; thence South 49001' West 100 feet; thence South 41059' East 214.4 feet to the point of beginning. _' -- PARCEL Vs -- = ?s Lot 36, PANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS, Washington County, Oregon. WNW ,�y ySw te• _ STATE OF OREGON l Fa --__ County of Washington J SS i <. . F: 1/111.• _- — I,Je RHans Di or of Assessment ====.-= and Taxation a vier of Con- �"" rry - veyances la a , lo by certify - - that the T(dtnOtdf VAI IVI'''. = Doc : 92031817 i --- Rect: 76897 38.00 I 05/11/1992 01:59:11PM irM . , r • Yr ^ . iL ' 3 a. 1��a ( 1Y•i• 4. L--- _. }< y_t r�`':� y v •• �t Z• 3't -_ . Yi.:$'• ,'i rx pis_ 2 � '- -_= Slli 'r • +it° b . } . � : ,„.„.A.„‹V :R }3 : ��r_ .:. `k•9 "• .. fi• ' • ...3I iW i..'y t.s: 5, G.tA`Av l•°iy,. '.-.m_—r�:ite . - ._._:_ ;L�..1 .•\.% ;._jai r- i..* ' .:. .j • � ;. ' :� �?` .� .-Y-.t `-,,�- _-_--------•- •--_.— `+*`- ry iia` .u-=; :?` . ;• r .t?:, r ‘^-41W . .• ' .- .--- _ —,:;; .iri • -, fr. ; t.. 7 'yn .?- feu—. ,,.t�' ,t iii":L�- LJ r ?, ___- -- IJ• t ; �r~UJ :ii,'Yiw.,t}. s t r e�yye� � J ::"b�;,1;•�;y^- ) . jC� 1,Lrc r r.t ._ --_ l v ri y c..l .:ii.;j '!.; Y' , {,.. ,.. .41 rt ,1 L ri' l 44 �. iw J 1 J .-r i :3h ` z�,ft 'f � J {_tc �.,.q• :._ �tY4i��1}�c. � '. �� Y�i,� �r c�Lt s`-__-_—�. _ �•�---�°a°� tt — — — a __---__-----__s— •� -77„"-7:--------.--"- .;.r_z�:r•Yva+f}:Y.�'y�W.,7rlil?^i:.�aa.rr•a$v4s.iir-`_ _ ___ __ 7-:s,4-:j a Ya..."'"t."6.: —,f_,.-;.7 LY,p.fir!AY.YT'-,.-,...:-...--..-_._.__-_-.--- = —_ ,.+ akT...3�-.�-� i.. .31••x' '. JU1[i�_,'yS9aa_r•us=t:.-=:- ,ass „___.er-.n.a=_ _=_ . b.!,rt4+ 'C4wani���iS�'�./r:_ a...r.i+�7----_- ___- . •' . !LS''- ":::.:5'aM:.eM.' I.nYV-•.Y.v1.lY'y..:'iij r^ ..1CY--�.. .__-. --....... _-.... .....__...�. .. -:« tir i,# 04-in4t iy a.iasam e..J �:r� n.: ;. ;^z�r., rar•�•r. ;,,..'7� -- .•. . z •' � i s ' : f . ^s'vJ ... .q ....M _ - -__ .�' :r . •i :.: ,i! •; . L � .rY..:.� : ^!:5v..i.:._.w:ar.<�+C1'L.• S•S AMERI 4� >,�f ;, 94- First A ican Title Insurance mpany of Oregon IFS Washington(OR) Prepared For: Prepared By. Customer Service Department 1700 SW Fourth Avenue - Portland, Oregon 97201-5512 Phone: (503) 222-3651 Fax: (503)790-7872 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Owner : Akerman Richard D Ref Parcel Number : 2S113AB 00400 CoOwner : Wathey James E T: 02S R: 01W S: 13 Q: 253 Site Address : *no Site Address* Parcel Number : R0513162 Mail Address : 12031 SW Breyman Ave Portland Or 97219 Map Number . Telephone : Owner: Tenant: County :Washington(OR) SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION Transferred : 05/11/1992 Loan Amount . Document# : 31812 Lender . • Sale Price Loan Type . Deed Type Interest Rate . %Owned Vesting Type . PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION Map Page& Grid MktLand : $108,640 Census : Tract: Block: MktStructure . Subdivision/Plat : Fanno Creek MktOther . Neighborhood Cd : YI5 Mkt Total : $108,640 Land Use : 3002 Vacant,Industrial M50 Assd Total : $80,820 Legal : FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS,LOT PT 37, %Improved . : ACRES .42 04-05 Taxes : $1,318.21 Exempt Amount : Exempt Type . Levy Code : 02374 Millage Rate : 16.3101 PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS • Bedrooms Lot Acres : .42 Year Built . Bathrooms Lot SqFt : 18,295 EffYearBlt . • Heat Method Bsm Fin SqFt Floor Cover . Pool Bsm Unfin SqFt : Foundation . • Appliances Bsm Low SqFt Roof Shape . • Dishwasher Bldg SgFt Roof Matl . Hood Fan 1st Flr SqFt InteriorMat . Deck Upper Fir SqFt : Paving Matl . Garage Type Porch SqFt Const Type Garage SF Attic SqFt Ext Finish . Deck SqFt . This title information has been furnished,without charge,in conformance with the guidelines approved by the State of Oregon Insurance Commissioner. The Insurance Division cautions intermediaries that this service is designed to benefit the ultimate insureds. Indiscriminate use only benefiting intermediaries will not be permitted. Said services may be discontinued. No liability is assumed for any errors in this report. 4ST AMEBIC 4 .--� ; ` _> '`` First Arrican Title Insurance Ompany of Oregon Washington(OR) Prepared For: Prepared By. Customer Service Department 1700 SW Fourth Avenue - Portland, Oregon 97201-5512 Phone: (503)222-3651 Fax: (503) 790-7872 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Owner : Akerman Richard D Ref Parcel Number : 2S113AB 00500 CoOwner : Wathey James E T: 02S R: 01W S: 13 Q: 253 Site Address : *no Site Address* Parcel Number : R0513153 Mail Address : 12031 SW Breyman Ave Portland Or 97219 Map Number . Telephone : Owner: Tenant: County :Washington(OR) SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION Transferred : 05/11/1992 Loan Amount . Document# : 31812 Lender . • Sale Price Loan Type . Deed Type Interest Rate . Owned Vesting Type . PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION Map Page&Grid MktLand : $152,920 Census : Tract: Block: Mkt Structure . Subdivision/Plat : Fanno Creek Mkt Other . Neighborhood Cd :Y15 Mkt Total : $152,920 Land Use : 3002 Vacant,Industrial M50Assd Total : $119,900 Legal : FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS,LOT PT 37, %Improved . : PLUS PT VACATED ROAD, ACRES .59, MS 04-05 Taxes : $1,949.74 : X#99279 Exempt Amount : Exempt Type . Levy Code : 02374 Millage Rate : 16.3101 PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS • Bedrooms Lot Acres : .59 Year Built . Bathrooms Lot SqFt : 25,700 EffYearBlt . Heat Method Bsm Fin SqFt Floor Cover . Pool Bsm Unfin SqFt : Foundation . Appliances Bsm Low SqFt Roof Shape . Dishwasher Bldg SgFt Roof Matl . Hood Fan 1st Fir SqFt InteriorMat . Deck Upper Fir SqFt : Paving Matl . Garage Type Porch SqFt Const Type . Garage SF Attic SqFt Ext Finish Deck SqFt . • This title information has been furnished,without charge,in conformance with the guidelines approved by the State of Oregon Insurance Commissioner. The Insurance Division cautions intermediaries that this service is designed to benefit the ultimate insureds. Indiscriminate use only benefiting intermediaries will not be permitted. Said services may be discontinued. No liability is assumed for any errors in this report. $,t AMERI 4 e - First Arrican Title Insurance �rnp y of g w �=� �r��;; �� an o Oregon Washington(OR) Prepared For: Prepared By. Customer Service Department 1700 SW Fourth Avenue - Portland, Oregon 97201-5512 Phone: (503)222-3651 Fax: (503)790-7872 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Owner : Wathey James E Ref Parcel Number : 2S 113AB 00500 CoOwner : Ackerman Richard D T: 02S R: 01W S: 13 Q: 253 Site Address : 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd Tigard 97224 Parcel Number : M0947505 Mail Address : 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd Tigard Or 97224 Map Number . Telephone : Owner: Tenant: County :Washington (OR) SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION Transferred Loan Amount . Document # Lender . • Sale Price Loan Type . Deed Type Interest Rate Owned Vesting Type . PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION Map Page& Grid : 685 G1 MktLand . Census : Tract: 308.04 Block: 3 MktStructure : $1,350 Subdivision/Plat MktOther . Neighborhood Cd : 8002 Mkt Total : $1,350 Land Use : 1092 Res,Mobile Homes M50 Assd Total : $1,350 Legal : MFD STRUCT SERIAL# 111860S502783, %Improved : 100 : X#99279 ON REAL ACCT 04-05 Taxes : $20.09 : 2S113AB-00500,REAL MS Exempt Amount : Exempt Type . Levy Code : 02374 Millage Rate : 16.3101 PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS Bedrooms : 1 Lot Acres Year Built : 1960 Bathrooms : 1.00 Lot SqFt EffYearBlt : 1960 Heat Method : Forced Bsm Fin SqFt Floor Cover : Carpet Pool Bsm Unfin SqFt : Foundation : Post Pier Appliances Bsm Low SqFt Roof Shape . Dishwasher Bldg SqFt : 480 Roof Matl : Steel Fabr Hood Fan 1st Flr SqFt : 480 InteriorMat : Paneling Deck Upper Flr SqFt : Paving Matl . Garage Type Porch SqFt Const Type : Wdstud\no Shtg Garage SF Attic SqFt Ext Finish : 229 • Deck SqFt . This title information has been furnished,without charge,in conformance with the guidelines approved by the State of Oregon Insurance Commissioner. The Insurance Division cautions intermediaries that this service is designed to benefit the ultimate insureds. Indiscriminate use only benefiting intermediaries will not be permitted. Said services may be discontinued. No liability is assumed for any errors in this report. -- — '--•�J-=� -_:' .;r."ar��� ..�t:'q!' .. , ._!_:.- ic• - v V f` ` • O(M Ns.741—p[CIAI WARRANrf 00(0 11.4I,1b.l.r C• •••l. ..�.w • 92031812 T _` SPECIAL WARRANTY 0551) M• nQtoO Count ay. 1C110W ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,That HOWARD W...BOYTE,and MARILYN A. BOYTE, ...Husband and Wife.......... hereinafter called grantor, for the comlderation hereinafter elated,does hereby grant,bargain,eell and convey unto hICHARD D. --- •...:.• ,,,.., ,,,,p�FvRMAH•,.an JAMES k. W:�T Y,•. ae.,._tanante in common '',y' hereinafter called grantee,and unto grantee's heirs,successor,'and assigns all of that certain real property with the I tenements,hereditament,' and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining,situated in the County i. ot..Washi.pgto{►... ,Stone of Oregon,described as follows,to-wit: - I'Je�.. See EXHIBIT "A", attached hereto and 1: by this reference incorporated herein .: _ as though fully set forth. ,_:_i-� � I c WAIIRAMST M VS ..-- rm( �w ri This Deed ie given in fulfillment of that certain Contract of Sale recorded IMINIMMIRf ---- December 22, 1986 as Fee No. 86059743. �. yid_e_` Pr WACe INSUfFICIENI,COFINNUI OESC4r(JOr1 on ovum S'DII Q To Rave and to Hold the same unto the said grantee and grantees heirs,successors and assigns forever. _ `= •_= c And the grantor hereby covenants to and with the said grantee and grantee's heirs, successors and assigns ' 6 that said reel property is Tree from encumbrances created or guttered thereon by grantor and that grantor will war- ; -_ rant and defend the same and every part and parcel thereof against the lawful claims and demands of all persona chiming by,fluough,or under the grantor. t,''�' ~• The true and actual consideration �rf paid for this transfer,stated fn terms of dollar,is 4.153,400..00... . � -•_ _ 0Ides�earefeut[seadadnaowddess&aaauaetsiwm 0ma.tROAErhe•-etherpropertyor-value-gnveeoeyremised-whiefrie.. - ,: . � 'h.-0eneiderooiers(indicate Wh ch).@(The sentence between the eyrnbola0,ll not eppllwble,ehould be deleted.See ORS 93.030.) .-- � ,::_:' In construing this deed and where the context so requires, the singular includes the plural and all grammatical changes shall be implied to make the provisions hereof apply equally to corporations sad to individuals. - - In Witness Whereof,the grantor has executed this instrument on May..„ ,.........,,I9..92.;if a _ - --`� corporate grantor,it has caused its name to be signed and its seal fixed by an officer or other person duty author- ;1'i. ? +• iced to do so by its board of directors, .-•- .,ors' .-: THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DE- vr7" OWara W. Boyte l,,:.-;,?I SCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND �y/� ( -•7� c�>fi . ..._= USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING !(% JS ' �-^ .... ... .l.Cr...,.......-.._....„.... 1y THIS INSTRUMENT. THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE �N1ar3. Yn A. Boyle _ ,'ti • PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR Y - p , - ” COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES. -r III...wed 6Y•eetpe Ilea.elllt tement,..I and t�(u_e w tan lee toga of od.e W Idpmant oppe,u..I ItjJ .�•+ —_ STATE OF OREGON, ) STATE OF OREGON, ) Vii :.; -_== G�R t tr y1w 0. ))u. 3 r;�:T� County ot._._..-..._......1.'.Y 1/4w_...�._,._,...._ County of__.„._..._.._. ': a. —a �_ TMs lnatru�°ni was acknowledged before me on This Instrument was acknowledged before me on....._.........-.-......-__.__._, �� ---- ._Malt,..- v .........__.,Je...9.2eby......... ..__._.Y._. _._. '7:,4 '% .7"I‘''';'- as r� )f'�iowarL i floyte...and. o _ • -_ 1N :, Notary Pub: farOr gon NotetyPublicforOregen 'r' 1; r• ••CV.( m"R., bt p I1 lf/� My (SEAL) i'r" �P' 1'� tw mlasioner firer: l ��'+� -- ... .. . ti.ri'�+'his ,1-•l�e9.K. r34ari_iyn Boyte STATE OF OREGON, w•- ,i`r' o »1-- s• . 4--0 f oSs��S-4 .r .-.__........ .... _. County of.»._...._..._._.._..._ ._ ','T •..ri:;'",tnnn/Mild. yfrtn:Os:.MANE AMO ••ea 1 (,:1�:4 I certify that the within instru- % :-z . • � .... :.'f'Wa'they ment was received for record on the • y.,e.:, . day of 19 --- ---•------_._--_.,_-_-.....___. err._.._ .o'clock.....M.,and recorded e/1ANT IV•MAMA AND 0000050 SPACE 0(.(05(0 in book/reel/volume No....-..-»._.».•.on iiiiiii — After tNeldle(nom to ION ________ Fidelity National Title 0cco0D(1r.0.c page....-.......„__„..or as fee/fife/imtru- _... _ _. ...._..__ _.._. ment/mfcrofilm/reception No ._.»-., Etillaililit 1141 NE Division Record of Deeds of said county. iiC 'Greshaml, OR 97030 ATtn: T'DF Witness my hand and seal of ' NAME.Aoo■ca■.vP' •'• • - -- • -• �� County affixed. U.fa•aftalato It twout•all I•..t•I..M.M Atli N 1.1 I the f.aw1M addnle. Samna _no eha_nge... _ --y._._._._ .. • ... .. .._._.. ...._._..... I a- NONE„..,..»w..................... ..TIM.. ...» --- _. ______.__._,-___._-...._..--..._.__.___...... ...... .... . .. By...._ ._»Deputy �- NAM(.ADD■05(.xiP - •••••••••••••• 7:-r4 r fi^...W.,•"14.1'?Y111K*4∎1"' l;' _...1” ._ ‘HJ iFiij 'AI'nr'l . - • r ,, yeltS4P•1 ., tT.-r-_.• . ...-- -------=.i�.>+:•:r� ..... -`_i. ''..........7.-7.7777:`:...;..,_-,,,-._..-_- - -�- v.i•.,:.f: ..._`.�T, _ _ :•1 1.----.7:1_11-).-1,;=,.•:• .M1--- m • -= EXHIBIT "A" - .- - vas• as-, i, = :. PARCEL I:: i..' • — That part of Lot 37, FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS, Washington County, .• Oregon, described as follows: • Beginning at a point which is North 49° 01' 10" East 100 feat from - :: the most Southerly corner of Lot 37, which point is the true point • of beginning of the tract herein described; thence North 49° 01' 10" =- a East 85 feet to a point; thence North 44° 37' 35" West 214.40 feet _____: to a point in the Nrothwesterly line of said Lot 37; thence South _ 49° 01' 10" West 85 feet to the most Northerly corner of that tract described in that certain contract recorded in Book 500, page 133, :--_:_- on November 8, 1963, in Washington County, Oregon Deed Records; W`{JM`"I' thence South 44° 37' 3S" East 214.76 feet to the m^_'7-' point of beginning. , :_ . .� PARCEL II: If. __�_1 That part of Lot 37, FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS, Washington County, M.�A •._ �� Oregon, described as follows:. rr= ;� Al Beginning at the most Westerly corner of said Lot 37; thence South '". _a? 44° 37' 35" East 214.76 feet to the most Southerly corner of said " .gel - _ i Lot 37; thence North 49° 01' 10" East 100.0 feet to a point; thence utV' t —,_•= North 44° 37' 35" West 214.40 feet to a point in the Northwesterly __ line of said Lot 37; thence South 49° 01' 10" West to the point of . ,P-tt IT:! beginning. .,- z:Y F, _ ....- 4-isi i 4..S: —,•.-.7;n-- STATE OF OREGON ts?='yi _;,��1 SS ':;:7;74. - -_ gI County of Washington _ •_��F I JerryR.H�p�pstwa 114):. 'q''. •`�* and Taxation c i Assessment • '��: :ry3i veyances'� c , rftdro. :ebvO f `' - that the 1 y .•.•-._. �t received t eg was ;pyr': __.-_- said •, rds o/ ,:.;�. :.h, Ex- -- Of • ' • - _ - COUitit• • E4:,-.:-. Doc : 92031812 :.,1`�, Rect: 76897 - 38.00 47'5...'. 05/11/1992 01:59:09PM ,�i,.t : :K -----r�492 '''',..7- -14,` .,"- e.iVilliqr,?1,' _ T:r. .‘'•l•'' •./=:':'.• r T , ..•;,.•`;.'1.1-:-..:..---;":-- r i 'Ri.•r�fe"- i '� 1tT ''' L MIS`_t�s 'f _ \.:f•..:-� Y h.! t��.,.rr ; ••1 _ IlYi • ___..-___ -,a-: _.,..,....q.,,,... .,,,v, ••'rf�ii" :::Q= •l.'r:'' I!'r.•- r.r:.•.'. - �' v S;�rliStI '�y' •° ;r iLt •,,�- ,..131f __" ' ..1'•. 17 r. x. i«T (f:�^ _{ '-';r-:".44., �! .:,j;:i;�.:-;d;r. :�f.-, -'1n.,,�. �'`<i•} .•^?�'t - 4 i- P r ',•-mss' )�:i.°' - i .�- '!:-'•.r:?'�"' c,c-.- ,• �. � •t !. VA: f.r 72.1.7.......,•;,:i= A -:,.: i- 1 liar:..: •«s?• : - �_ •.J:..;»: y- , •::.. ,, ;,/s ... .-f=._47-- ---1.:.--7.-- r� -'yFT .,�•. L / �•`•:,t;• +; �� _ i. r r �i�3' y�� • lr t�.,. ( y e0� {_ ;c:.' 4 ,r a>i+� - f::a J.....v �.t_•4•eF I� .c;;r; :, 14VAJ'.- ;t{. • ---- .TIT 7 �. ��'�'. �", � .,i?�•` -,i' • '•mot- > :i-,,,.,••:' % t: -r• c , r.;rb'%!mw"'Tt f'�e+°: �4'.:;,::'.__&.):- i�, 4i;y :• .., ,.'•.;c1::_' ^tit`.-�!4,?:- ' .3-" .•:.�'x'- v ( nF S ---- i { - °,r� c �:� y.;x:,,,y,a:.. �y;) r..Y :k' 1'+ , s"2sb ur rr -_ ..� '•-'� +3`' e?' .n rP,�..�te,r'•.,..•w`i i..r.5. ..•� �'_ �Y.'�; 1...w.in:-(�',�-,�• _•C�.. ,r .. �` _[' -.-- .:a*„.C r7y;.:-. --, 'L(P.r w :f!•f'1:-Z li 1fi..- lA �..>� ,,�,Y)- ,.l� r_kf. ''I . � .. ..._.:11:�� _ _ __ -- -j':d ti .�.]C )A-l• f. -II>�•.'L ^.14 '�` Y. �.1 '+'_�"? ,,CJ, �r1 `'•d73�'••"' �1!": �'C,�7:` - .,.._t`:�.F �-�::) ---'7..1.,-' �•.r• = r4'IN:-Sr' ".._.4r..•_ -Wr ..,,,` , ` •).k. 1 f-, ) ,.-.-- _`1 .- _ •. -----.------- _;t-�S�..:.1" ' .. 1 ' CL�`'i' ."l4 .71 "^•).S•• •''f't 4' • -ni.:- Yf�',`! .-iF:,ra.;G: .• �.k5.S J : `_- ,d. ___ __-_° n # yy_.t_t.,— "r. 'c•_.? ..«I_I..cam ..f 1, .t^.7s,r':b _ _ yam. _r., t.� z. —_ i!,-i.�.:. °i ri ='tL r�.••:M',ia�u'1'"L.�^^ �lit..��i�' e.•.{�. '-�•• c°J_r.Z<"�•s ,.nw�ii{,''�=,r ', • __ �,r.� , �rY.',. V �}1y. Sofa fi.- emu. •;.eyi_.' - --'---___—_s��"�.•,z it � l�iifsa-�Y�'-.'•'�`'�`.'.ST��?s�-r z�r�°R,'�'.,..y'• 'w�.,. ----- --...=.::77.71-3' ��,�2 ��' �ri•.i.6"r...•'�:� ?�F,^y�-ti�,'T.er•� vJ +euc,m�.__ --.- . wu sk! �r'1•� r; -y,., yti'• ..;?/-4.-h'is �- - _T .m.��. p � 7 ,;I •.1.,'r. i• C i!�•F�'4•i1 j r�:�+� wd ••ia:-uM-..iov.'• •--=.-- -__ _. 'x;'!� f "�'i•:,'; •ny� Y�Y� ��-.t•_3;•', �C. S"tt.t: .�iJk'Fam:;�..�':s w.I:.r�:iyr�s� �� _- - --- :rr�s :76 ,..tr�Ii�:76• c r;, .F' , i_ i" iA ,, >9 :r'g.,., ��-'•�+.''_ ..". ... ._. ---- --. :-si-�o..r-:.nom,�'..>..ri.•• 'r... 3� •`'I�JG�, �:f. •.s;r�q+n_vr±Mrur+�.�...,.�-.- . ._ _ � ._-__,. --.-:2i� •: nz:.r,P-r,r;lr ;.:y.P:'A:.- ,: -•�....-- -:y-.-.+...,{:'c,:ar:•rr^.ixhvey te . a�1 -. —� Y�• ', _ .:.i..•:�••, "-:•w 'mss.•. i•r_� .I. �S�?'r..'.'='"" S,, AMER, • • 0- _ .- °9� First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon - ' ,. %,4 "'`' ' An assumed business name of TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON This map is provided as a convenience in locating property First American Title Insurance Company assumes no liability for any variations as may be disclosed by an actual survey Reference Parcel Number 2S 113AB 00500 SEE MAP 2S I I2DC a,. / 30. c. if tat/ 3 — 412.44 Q/ 300 s ss 4s 10"w ,e° 200 (CS. 16293) �I 2.93 AC. •�,• .?6AG: , / ANN0 CREE K / :e: 36 444 38 (CS. 12395) �`� ?�,$'"y ' M il t�� r\ � r� � � r1r� �, r .� , da,.\ .0) �4.> el ¢ os K: .\ ,j11�1'' L:"��� 700 .•. :=N 0 500 37 po'' 3.384e.4:01\ qc9 v,� / e'\c�` '.' 594C 000 1 101 \�°" t , Ea 1; -• 139Ac. N/ lig �t. f..-.-; • i! dj �t 1111 4"%\ \499 #•1' `.\ * ♦ 11111 lt 4f.v., ,24,,v0 --'1,-\o, . 4141,(1.1 ■ •1;: ♦ ,�6 � •/ `r GQ,. /r �r, 171 ,. . al'"..\ \ 23 ..:74 "•1 e.~I 600 — - — / (C.3.18823) ,t)"c.- s 6C'iAe. `` — — — —CA eT— 4 41.1? • S.1 AMER/ ;.: ;. „,, + First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon y An assumed business name of TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON This map is provided as a convenience in locating property First American Title Insurance Company assumes no liability for any variations as may be disclosed by an actual survey Reference Parcel Number 2S 113A13 00500 NW I/4 NE 1/4 SECTION 13 T2S R I W.W.M. 2S 113A8 — WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON SOO SCALE 1.100' . LAW. .w_'”/ SEE MAP / as I MOO 7[C MA/ ~ .tr y / •.. ,ZS I 12C0 r----. w Q" .7 l .:r.rs. - ■ p0 ICS NY11 �/ .�'I ar• '`S'° .. uric E .arc / •Iu.MUM -�,- -i FANNO CREEK iCa°1'24"/ I � i s, ACRE 7Rkc7S 4� p ''Zr `: • -I � m� � 4o te f A r \ \ 7a0 \ N•• s� IoI 4"''''''.'SP I# .... If S .< .i •+4 ti I d i I / / i' \` .#' N.41>. V'-'�I .1■�•'O4y I XP / d. •fit / �, r` ICJ �.d' / \x/23-74 --' •_ Goo .•' 1 4Mt� tuo..c s` �, `` ----sv--- . v wo° �qa SEE MAP I� 3�� N'''' + IS I MA I�(Vy M I SEE MAP ••;I 'WL.a i °• �O ,'' 12 01 �\ a 1 CAA 4 '., y I I•1 IMO .• re '- E \` I a • I I 23-87 ,oar°g a ' -�--_I, , a ; $p • 1 `_ +O, FOR ASSESSMENT I. 1<I { I G 7, PURPOSES ONLY 1 00 NOT RELY ON I Ei d• b II 7 FOR ANY OTHER USE • lei€ I se a.S.CN. I _ I i! I!,v Jai I I j�y II a I I I$ .,. 1 o . I I I wee I.E sIuuurl I I '* 1 Mil A rat I I `Z i. 4 t I I YSI m I p t u u..1 I C t i 1 I I m ?Y. ,t. ...1 au' ... COUNCII �� 1�.1] ' AG1 NO. 2 ' DURHAM 1 it • ..•, !9 TIGARD get LIAC Ma, 2S I 13A8 • • • • C o • • • 1-Q).-T) • • Design Group • a Parati company • • • • • • • • • • • Akerman / Wathey / LaRusso • Zone Change Application • September 26, 2005 •I Modified November 1, 2005 • •I •I •I • • •I 7,, , • J • d. • ' '—^ - \ ',;...,..,, \ • • .i • t" \^\\\ ne\ ,,s • \ • • t3 • • • • • Akerman/Wathey/LaRusso Zone Change Application • • TABLE OF CONTENTS • • KEY INFORMATION 1 • • SUMMARY 2 • BACKGROUND INFORMATION 3 • SUMMARY OF NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING 6 • COMPARISON OF I-L AND I-P ZONES 7 • • COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CRITERIA • Criteria #1 -- Demonstration of compliance with all applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designations 12 • Criteria #2 -- Demonstration of compliance with all applicable standards • of any provision of this code or other applicable implementing ordinance 25 • Criteria #3. Evidence of change in the neighborhood or community 27 ....or evidence of a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan 111 or zoning map 29 11 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 31 • CONCLUSIONS 32 • EXHIBITS 33 • Exhibit `A' Tax Assessor's map Exhibit `B' Site Plan Base Map �I LIVED r� • Exhibit `C' Aerial photographs of the surrounding area L I �l IC I� • Exhibit `D' Aerial photograph of the site ^"?a a 2. 20 • Exhibit `E' Photographs of the existing site and access ATV OF "i IGARD • Exhibit `F' Maps showing zoning history ;‘A TENGINEERING • Exhibit `G' Conceptual development plan • Exhibit `H' Pre-application meeting notes • Exhibit `I' Record of neighborhood meeting • Exhibit `J' Photographs of uses allowed or not allowed in the I-P zone • Exhibit `K' Traffic Impact Analysis Report • Exhibit `L' Map of all industrial zones • Exhibit`M' List of properties zoned I-H, I-L and I-P, sorted by zone and size • • • 0 . i • • • ' , • • 4 1 • i . ID (1110 00 • • ‘, , :10 0* 100 +0 III • -: • -. ..:[:::::::! . • . . :.:. ••-•••• ..-- P„_ „„„„ .. . m„„.:::::.:::,::::::::::.....„„„,..,,,,,7,..„,,,,„,,,„:„„,„,,,,,,,„,,,,,,„,,„„..,. . . .... .. ,•41:=Pi±n ••.. ::::a::: :ii::::::;:;::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::i1:6:::::::::::iii::::::::i1::::::::ii:;::::::::::::::::::::::::::ip:::::i:::::::::.:.:.:.:+41.:11!.11.1.:... • ••••........... .. es.i: • •""' .. ( .1 .... r-1 f ' 1*-r-1 \ ...--.......) .. .:.---.) \ 1......./ (3 I J .i r i LI 1----':: 1-.....; • III '...-• : -, :::::f:AA•• --•:-..,„••••:: '....‹,,,,-,,-,./',kJ •:•--..E\ , _I' '''' .,-.. :. . ... ----'-7::'.. '....•.'''.'":::::.'''. • ::: • 1§ AAA, ••••,..-...•:::z., , A • • •• • ••••. ••• •• • sy• :A :--. ••••'':::••-,-•••• d=„.....• -1 ‘•••- ‘A: -..„/ -••••,....t.•-•-„r\ s•A„, ?.„:- 71:1"'A.-,::-LAAJ ": • • :.:. • • ••• •• .. • •••• • ••••••...... • • •••• • • 3 • „.• ......,„:„:„:„.:•...:::::.:::•••••::::•••••::::•::::::: A., ‘....;Yr.r..„..„.• .- rr....,„„r„,•‘..,r.\•••., .r.--- .. .; I.--..• ..p.s ...„,\ I ,......, 1 i... .. ._ :. . ....:...:::..:..ile,rti.c,1:: ...:..::..::. •:•::•:::•::::::::•::::::::::000:4:::::::::•:::::::::::::::::::::::Edummarebohj :. .iiiiiiiiiiik,iiiiiiii .... -,„.1.)31:-, • ".. • . I.— `• ....),',... \--.,. - • -: 1-44-. >4, s ... Piri I. miginimo rIA:re., ••••• • • • ..1.4:4; • ,!:....;....".,,,,,,•-' ''.....••• ..V... 11 N1/4.,'.. •:. - :.•,,-:.44.,,..-....;L•kg-i. ....,...,.,.. „,, \ L 4 . . .ktiot.te,..‘ • •• •.:.:::::::apigg:puo.■:::4,..: • ..•••-•.• - ••:.:.. :..::..w.•:%•:•::::: : i .. , •••,.: ..„, ..,....„„,„ . . ,•• •• •••, ,k ,,,,,, •,•-4.... ::-......_ ."i'Fi',....".1\''•• 0mveo,-. ...!..-.,• :". l'II- •1 ti',1 I \,.. - ,• •1:-.: : _7::. ..,::: ,.....,— ....,,(•>\_...., I ,-...-.:,<' ••• ••*0 • •......... -• ,•.....-:%4:e• •II,, l=-,5 4:: • . • .' • .•'-r ji '''''•••• •■•••.,, - .. c '.1.....i„......ii''''' •:. •\'''-..-4,. •,1,1, , , • ... !:•:.: :..:..•.•..:•:::::';:4:: .: • r•••••-••-,— ,,,, •. ,A,... LA: ii, ., , •••,. ! : ‘A.,,r i: ,t.:::-,,,4-046 z ::::::::::,::::...:.:::.•:•.:.:..... - .1'.- ...-•. .':,.., • • - •- il .1:: ,.! st, : !.. METRO Title 4 •. ...1.'.........."1 ..."....k.. ..•'.'../71- L !; '. • \ . :.. •.- . \.••\ '... ": ' ig 'FA- k ...-"- •••'';' ,IsIn. f 1 .'\'N,•• , :;..4. r--. . ' . i ,- ••..k4 ' ' "414 :.*:: .... .,, ___A.,:--- *- *-..--.- ---; t .> , ,• i. _ .. fill.,-_,.. `.:.;',"--- Legend " : • ••• • - , 4 +:4-7- 4. . ::, : : • .....:.v .. :..... .. . . • • • .: ::. :: ... . ..... • : .. ..• •• • .., i . . • . ........, . . f.47 7 • . . . .. . . . . ... ... ... • •••••• .. ........• •......•............. .. ..............•.•• • •• :• •... •• • • . . . 4 ... 1:::::::•:::.....::: .....::.:•:. . • .. . . . 4. • . 44 . . . : • • .• . • : 11 . 1::::::::::::::::.:• :1...:.4::.: .. . . . • .. : . ........... ... . . . .• . .• • ... . . . .. : . --1___1 ,.1.„...:L-2 ••• ... •••••.• • ....:::::::::::::::14.,.:::!,.::, . • . •• .. ... .• • ••••• :• : s_ Ernp•.ovnierlt Land v::.:-.:........: 1 ...• .. . ! • : ....,_•• i.„., A simillAill : .1 .... :i!::.::::•,...:::•:..: ..... :.. . . : • • :I • :.2:_ri::qt:21....:: 11/•:::::::::::::::::::::::::41:::,FA: ::::.:::::::::::•:::::.:r.•::•:•:. . . . . . . • • • . • :::::::::::::::::::•••••1: .:-..:: 1 . • • • • . •• • .. .,... . . -.. . . • • . . . . . . • • :. ' ' 11;4, . • •• ' .. • •• 1::::!:;:::•:....:;•.::.....:. .....:.. s .•. • : : • ...- :.: M.. . • . . ki, *... ' ,.. — ' indusin•a!• 1•••and ::::::::::...::•.-:•::..:.•.:.::: • • • • :i,-A A.,.....A..„4...4,:AEA...4.4 . .., :::•:::::::::•::::: p.:•::?::::::.:.:•:.:::•:•.::•:.:: • • • • • • • • . , ::. • i•-- ,AA,„,...:A •••,..:s.:::::AlEAA • I ::•:•:::::.:::+••:•:•••••:::::::::. . . : .. . . . . . . ::::•::!:..:... .•::-.•-.......: : • • : , • •. „ :+::.:.:•: •.: ::::::: • • a. 1-1 r•••?2•••••• -•>••.•,:,,7:..Q.)[-;. : ... '1 ro ...• : •. ... , • . .. : ,, i„._.. ,i A.,„,,,A.,,,..e,,,,.....,.. • . , ••• .. ::::.:.::.::.:::::::I:::•:::::::::•• :::::::: ,::••:•::•::,..:::•••....s. •-•:,-, "h K.::::.:1-:-...:,,;;;,..';.Z...i•*.1 . • -:•: .-: : • • ti /' ..,,Y,.....\::.•:,(3.; •: . p Rediora...:v Sianil ..,:z.•.1 • ...:1:::A:::::•:::::::::.• :::::,••• , A ,..: • .:. •• • - .. Pei i . . .. i i Al;A:A.:;.y..-••,A>.it,,--., :. • • ..- ••:•••::::::11:::::::: . •••. - •.: . . . . ei - •i• • •.• •••••f ..: '..KI . __ .• .. • . • •: •• ••• •• ii!iiiiiiiiii::::::1,•1"1:...1.":•'.".:..: , •.. . . .. . . .: .. • • • • •. • :"......F!".11::::0:::',.•••••••••• .••••tt.,.. . ..... : : .... :...• • •• •••••,/iLl .. 1 .•_......,..... :: . . • • • • •• . • ::::.:.:.:::.:: ll: ..••••••••••••,..........,.......,....,...:.: .,: ..: ••••:••.,.. .,, :,•••• . . .111, ., ..: . .„f.:;1: • . . :i • • i i • , •. . WC:,,_,' •ill mil •' ., : • ..-- 41:„,.1.,.„ • • 7 i■ ... ... .. . ; . : i _ .:I:.....:::.:::!.:::i!*:: :i:::::::::i:::::::::!::;:::::!:::::;:t::::::::::.". ... • -- .. .: ..!' . "S>"*`..Nil I ?'''''. • :••..., t : - : I- <:„.. i 11 — - ,, • : -- . t - A„. *,.. ri • . • . . 1 • i• ••:/\• 1 :•:•• ;• : :, •-• :-. :0 „ : ...•.:•Iii m:.:-.*:••••-••••il : ,.... 3./ N• -..._ .1 I f- , . g11 :....m. • . . am „.....,-,......,_, 1 I —I:1 1 : . • •. 8 . _., ""—1 '"""""41 -..... . ::•$: .7,!: I \'.1/41'...,,''.• 1.... .: •• •::. • sq I f ._,... • • • • • • • KEY INFORMATION • • Project Name: Akerman/Wathey/LaRusso Zone Change • • Property Description: 2S113AB00500, 2S113AB00400, 2S113AB00300, • 2S112DC01100, 2S112DC01200, 2S112DC001300 • • Location: 15930 SW 74th Avenue, Tigard, OR 97224 • 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd., Tigard, OR 97224 • Parcel size: 6.0 acres, ± • • Current Comp. Plan: Industrial • • Current Zoning: Light Industrial (I-L) • • Applicant: Richard Akerman, James Wathey, Larusso Concrete • Company, Inc. • Applicants Representatives: • Land Use Planner Ed Murphy, AICP LDC Design Group • 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive • Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 • Site Designer Opus Architects & Engineers, Inc. • 1000 SW Broadway, Suite 1130 • Portland, Oregon 97205 • Traffic Engineer Julia Kuhn Kittelson & Associates • 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 • Portland, Oregon 97025 • • • • • • • • • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • • • • • • SUMMARY • • The owners of these six tax lots, which total about 6 acres in size, seek an • amendment to the Zoning Map from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) in • order to replace the existing outdoor storage areas and older buildings with new office, retail, and/or flex-space buildings. • ♦ Offices are permitted only as a limited use in the Light Industrial (I-L) zone, but are • allowed outright in the Industrial Park (I-P) zone. Some limited retail uses are also allowed in the I-P zone - up to 20% of the square footage. • ♦ No change to the Comprehensive Plan is necessary. The Comprehensive Plan • designation will remain "Light Industrial". • ♦ There are currently 689 acres of land zoned for industrial uses in Tigard, not counting land in public ownership. If the zone change is approved, there will still be • 689 acres of land zoned for industrial uses in Tigard. The zone change would not • remove any land from the industrial lands inventory. • ♦ The I-P zone has been applied to almost all of the other properties surrounding the • applicant's properties, including all of the area to the north, west and south, and one parcel to the east. • • ♦ The I-P zone is intended for uses that have less negative impact than the uses allowed in the I-L zone. The I-P zone allows light manufacturing and production, • indoor recreation, offices, and commercial lodging outright. It also allows (with Ilk restrictions) retail sales and eating and drinking establishments. The I-P zone does not allow general and heavy industrial uses, warehouses, freight movement, and • motor vehicle sales and rentals. •. • The environmental impacts of changing the zoning from I-L to I-P are positive. The • uses allowed in the I-P zone typically generate less truck traffic, noise, vibration, • glare/outdoor lighting and odors than the uses allowed in the I-L uses. More specifically, there will be little, if any, significant noise, glare, odor, vibration or other off-site impacts from the proposed uses. • ♦ With provision of certain mitigation measures recommended in the Transportation • Impact Analysis (TIA), the office park can be developed while maintaining acceptable • traffic operations and safety at all intersections and surrounding roadways in the site • vicinity. • ♦ The proposed use would result in a significant improvement to one of the key • "entryways" into Tigard. An area now dominated by outdoor storage of vehicles and materials would be upgraded into new multi-story buildings and landscaping. • ♦ The redevelopment of this site would result in substantial increased revenues to the • City and other public agencies, as well as a substantial increase in the number of • jobs in Tigard. • • 2 • • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • • • • • • • BACKGROUND INFORMATION • • Ownership: There are six parcels zoned I-L, which are identified as 2S113AB00500, • 2S113AB00400, 2S113AB00300, 2S112DC01100, 2S112DC01200, 2S112DC001300. Mr. Akerman and Mr. Wathey co-own five of the six tax lots; the sixth lot, tax lot • 2S112DC01300, is owned by LaRusso Concrete Company. See Tax Assessor's Map, • Exhibit 'A'. Akerman and Wathey also own tax lot 2S113AB00200, which is a 24,393 square foot lot with frontage onto Upper Boones Ferry Road. This tax lot is already • zoned I-P, and is developed with a small, single-story office building, which the owners • intend to retain. See Exhibit 'B' for a base map showing the site area. • Existing Conditions: The site is located within a large industrial/commercial area that • borders I-5 and extends from Highway 217 to Bridgeport Road and beyond. This site's location within this sizable mixed-employment area is clearly shown in the aerial • photograph, Exhibit 'C'. A close-up aerial photo of the site is included as Exhibit 'D'. • The properties are currently used for office and industrial uses, particularly for land- • intensive outdoor storage of materials and equipment, as they have been for several • years. There are some older, single-story buildings on the site, with some landscaping along Upper Boones Ferry Road. See photographs of the existing site improvements and • access driveways, Exhibit 'E'. As can be seen from the photographs, the site is flat, with • no known wetlands, wildlife habitat or other environmentally sensitive resources present. • • History: In the late 1970's and early 1980's, the City had several industrial zones, including an M-3 zone. In 1983, the M-3 zone was replaced by two zones, Light • Industrial (I-L) and Industrial Park (I-P). The subject site was re-zoned to I-L at that • time. Curiously, the adjacent site, Elmo Studd's lumber yard (tax lot 2S1133AB00700), was re-zoned to I-P at the same time. Most likely, the Elmo Studd's property was zoned • I-P to tie together the newly zoned I-P area along SW 74th Avenue north of Durham • Road with the newly re-zoned I-P west of 72nd Avenue and south of Durham Road. That • is, the Elmo Studd's property tied together the two new I-P areas on the map; this is evident by reviewing the 1981 and 1983 zoning maps. Zoning maps showing the • progression of zoning since the early 1980's are attached as Exhibit 'F'. • A small area at the 72nd Avenue/Upper Boones Ferry intersection was re-zoned to I-P in • 1983 as well. Much of the surrounding area east of 74th Avenue was re-zoned M-3 to I- • L. In 1987, the area that is now the PacTrust business park along Sequoia Parkway was rezoned from I-L and R-12 to I-P. In 1988, some of the properties adjacent to the • subject site, as well as one parcel across Upper Boones Ferry Road from the subject site, • were rezoned from I-L to I-P. Subsequently, the office building at the corner of 72nd and Upper Boones Ferry Road (tax lot 2S113AB00101) was constructed. As a result of these • zoning map changes -- most if not all initiated by PacTrust (Pacific Realty Associates, • LP.) -- the subject site became a little peninsula of remaining I-L almost entirely surrounded by I-P zoning. • • Adjacent zoning and uses. The site is bordered on the north, east, west and most of the south sides by I-P zoning. Only about 140' of the entire perimeter of the site is • adjacent to properties zoned I-L (across Upper Boones Ferry Road). The rest is adjacent • to I-P zoning. Directly across Upper Boones Ferry Road, to the southeast of the site, is a 3-story, Class 'A' office building. The property to the southwest of the site is Elmo • 3 • • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • • • • • Studd's building supply store and lumberyard, which is a non-conforming use for several • reasons. (For instance, it has outdoor sales, over 20% of the square footage of the building is used for sales-oriented retail, and less than 25% of the site is landscaped.) • Presumably, this property will eventually be redeveloped into more intensive uses. The • development of the subject site will set the stage for the eventual redevelopment of that • adjacent site. To the west of the site are the railroad tracks and 74th Avenue, then industrial buildings • along the west side of 74th Avenue, adjacent to Fanno Creek. The area to the north is • developed with single-level industrial/office buildings. A small shopping center borders • the subject site along the southeast side. • Description of Proposal. • Opus Development Company intends to construct a three-story office building on the • site, up to 127,000 square feet in size. It may be similar in size and appearance to the • office building the Opus built on Durham Road, near 79th Avenue. However, at this • point, the development plan is not finalized and no site development review application has been submitted to the City. For purposes of evaluating the impacts of the zone • change, however, this application uses a 127,000 square foot office building as the • proposed use of the property. See conceptual development plan, Exhibit `G'. The actual development plan may propose something with less square footage; it is unlikely that • anything more intense will be proposed. • Given the development standards in the I-P zone and the characteristics of the site, a S 127,000 square foot office building is a reasonable assumption to use to evaluate the • "worst case" impacts of the zone change, particularly with regard to traffic impacts. That is, with a height limit of only 45 feet, a building coverage maximum of 75% or • perhaps 80%, and a desired parking ratio of 4 spaces per 1000 square feet of building • space, it would be difficult to build more than the a 127,000 square foot building without • building a parking structure. Structured parking is cost-prohibitive for this site. Further, although the I-P zone allows up to 20% of the building floor area to be retail, the • "business park" category used in the traffic analysis assumes some limited commercial • uses would be developed. • The site does not appear to include any significant natural resource area, such as wetlands, steep slopes, floodplains, or wildlife habitats, based on the City's map of • sensitive lands, a site visit and a review of aerial photographs. Any development will 5 need to meet all of the current city zoning and development standards. The standards • in the I-P zone are more restrictive than the standards of the I-L zone, in terms of landscaping, lot coverage, setbacks, and off-site impacts such as noise. The I-P zone 5 also restricts heavier uses, such as outdoor storage and general manufacturing, • warehousing and freight movement. S The proposal to re-zone this 6-acre site from I-L to I-P was presented to the staff in a • pre-application meeting on August 11, 2005. As described below, the proposed rezone was also discussed with the some of the adjoining and nearby property owners in a • neighborhood meeting held on September 7th, 2005. See Exhibit `H' for a copy of the • pre-application conference notes, and Exhibit `I' for documentation of the neighborhood meeting. • • 4 • • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • • • • • The existing buildings are already connected to city sewer and water. The applicant • does not plan any changes to the surrounding utilities, and public works has not • identified any capacity constraints for sanitary sewer, water or storm drainage systems. Storm drainage from the proposed development will flow generally towards the west, • towards Fanno Creek. (The lowest spot appears to be at the west end of Fanno Creek • Drive). • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 5 • • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\£naldr\9\28\05 • • • • • • • • SUMMARY OF NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING • The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on September 7th after sending out a notice • to surrounding property owners and neighborhood representatives. Four neighbors • attended the meeting. No one called for more information either before or after the • meeting. No additional comments were received after the meeting. • Among the attendees were Bill and Dianne Fagan and Ron Pulliam, owners of the Elmo • Studd's lumber yard property. There was discussion of the existing shared access (Fanno Creek Place), and how that access could be used in the future as the main access • to the Elmo Studd's property when it redevelops, assuming that the City would require • the existing accessway to be closed at that time. • Andrea Nadeao, who owns property north of the subject site, was the fourth neighboring • property owner at the meeting. There was general discussion about the potential impacts on property values, and what street improvements will be needed in the future. • There was also discussion about the type and size of building(s) that would be • constructed on the site if the zone change application were to be approved. • There were no objections to the zone change raised by any of the property owners • attending the meeting. Further, the Fagan's and Mr. Pulliam did not object to the use of Fanno Creek Place as one of the two primary accessways to the property, and were • receptive to the idea of a shared access agreement. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 6 • • • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • • • • • • • COMPARISON OF I-L AND I-P ZONES • • The general purpose and description of the Industrial District zones are found in Chapter 18.530, quoted below. The actual uses allowed are listed in Table 18.530.1, shown on • the following pages. In the Table, some of the significant differences between the I-L • and I-P zones are shown in bold type. • 18.530.010 Purpose • • Provide range of industrial services for City residents. One of the major purposes of the • regulations governing development in industrial zoning districts is to ensure that a full range of job opportunities are available throughout the City so that residents can work close to home if • they choose. The location of land within each industrial district must be carefully selected and • design and development standards created to minimize the potential adverse impacts of industrial • activity on established residential areas. • • Facilitate economic goals. Another purpose of these regulations is to ensure that there is a full • range of economic activities and job opportunities within the City limits, in compliance with the economic goals of the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan. • • 18.530.020 List of Zoning Districts • A. I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for • combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, • personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odors, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In • addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone • have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, • and pedestrian-friendly. • B. I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general • industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, • nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. • • • • • • • • • • • 7 • • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • 0 •• • TABLE 18330.1 • USE TABLE: INDUSTRIAL ZONES • USE CATEGORY INDUSTRIAL PARK LIGHT INDUSTRIAL . • (t-P) (I-L) • RESIDENTIAL Household Living R i R 1 • Group Living N N • Transitional Housing N N • Home Occupation N N • CIVIC (INSTITUTIONAL) Basic Utilities C C • Colleges N N • Community Recreation C to C 10 • Cultural Institutions N N Day Care R 3,9 R 3,9 0 Emergency Services P P • Medical Centers N N • Postal Service P P Public Support Facilities P P • Religious Institutions N N • _ Schools N N • Social/Fraternal Clubs/Lodges N N • COMMERCIAL Commercial Lodging P N • Eating and Drinking Establishments R 2 N • Entertainment-Oriented -Major Event Entertainment N N • - Outdoor Entertainment P N • -Indoor Entertainment P N • -Adult Entertainment N N General Retail • - Sales-Oriented R 2 N • -Personal Services R 2 N • -Repair-Oriented P N -Bulk Sales N N • -Outdoor Sales N P • -Animal-Related P P • Motor Vehicle Related -Motor Vehicle Sales/Rental N P 0 -Motor Vehicle Servicing/Repair C P • -Vehicle Fuel Sales P P/C 7 • Office P N Self-Service Storage P _ P • • 8 •• • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • • 1110 • • • • USE CATEGORY INDUS R jL PARK LIGHT INDUSTRIAL • Non-Accessory Parking P P INDUSTRIAL • Industrial Services N P • Manufacturing and Production • -Light Industrial P P - General Industrial N P • -Heavy Industrial N N • Railroad Yards N N • Research and Development P P • Warehouse/Freight Movement N P Waste-Related N N • Wholesale Sales R 4 P • OTHER Agriculture/Horticulture P 5 P 5 • Cemeteries N C • Detention Facilities C N • Heliports C C • Mining N N Wireless Communication Facilities P/R 6 P • Rail Lines/Utility Corridors P P • P=Permitted R=Restricted C=Conditional Use N=Not Permitted • 1A single-family detached dwelling or single-family mobile or manufactured home allowed for caretaker or • kennel owner/operator when located on the same lot as the permitted use and is exclusively occupied by the • caretaker or kennel owner/operator and family. • 2These limited uses, separately or in combination, may not exceed 20% of the entire square footage within a • development complex. No retail uses shall exceed 60,000 square feet of gross leasable area per building or business. • • 3In-home day care which meets all state requirements permitted by right. • 4Permitted if all activities,except employee and customer parking,are wholly contained with a building(s). • • 5When an agricultural use is adjacent to a residential use, no poultry or livestock, other than normal household pets, may be housed or provided use of a fenced run within 100 feet of any nearby residence except a dwelling • on the same lot. • 6See Chapter 18.798, Wireless Communication Facilities, for definition of permitted and restricted facilities in • the I-P zone. • 7Vehicle fuel sales permitted outright unless in combination with convenience sales, in which case it is • permitted conditionally. • 8Explosive storage permitted outright subject to regulations of Uniform Fire Code. (Not applicable in I-P and • I-L zones) • 9 • • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • • • • 9Day care uses with over 5 children are permitted subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment in • accordance with Section 18.530.050.C.1. The design of the day care must fully comply with State of Oregon requirements for outdoor openspace setbacks. • 10Limited to outdoor Recreation on(1)land classified as floodplain on City flood maps,when the recreational • use does not otherwise preclude future cut and fill as needed in order to develop adjoining industrially zoned • upland; and(2.)land located outside the floodplain as shown on City flood maps, when the Recreation Use is • temporary and does not otherwise preclude allowed uses or Conditional Uses other than Recreation within the district. • The I-P and I-L zones are very similar in many ways. Driving through the areas zoned • either I-P or I-L, it is often very difficult to tell the difference between the • zones...particularly because one finds, for instance, outdoor sales in the I-P zone, and • offices in the I-L zone. Both zones allow light industrial uses and research and development activities. Both allow self-service storage units. Neither allows schools or • religious institutions or medical centers. • The main difference is that the I-P zone allows some uses that the I-L zone does not, • including: • ♦ Eating and drinking establishments; • Retail sales and services, which are restricted in the total amount of square footage • as well as the maximum square footage of any one retail use; • ♦ Repair-oriented retail; • ♦ Hotels; ♦ Indoor and outdoor entertainment; and • ♦ Offices. • The I-L zone, on the other hand, allows some uses that the I-P zone does not, or allows • only as a conditional use, including: • ♦ Outdoor sales ♦ Motor vehicle sales/rental and serving/repair • ♦ Industrial services • ♦ General industrial • Warehouse/Freight movement • Some uses, such as wholesale sales, are allowed in both zones but are more restricted in the I-P zone. That is, all activities have to be wholly contained within a building in the • I-P zone, but not in the I-L zone. • The I-P zone is not a commercial zone. Retail uses are limited to a maximum of 20% of • the entire square footage within a development complex. In addition, the I-P zone limits • the size of any one retail use to 60,000 square feet, so "big box retailers are not allowed. (Home Depot was approved prior to the size limitation). Many buildings in the • I-P zone have a combination of office and industrial uses. The photographs attached as • Exhibit `3', show the types of uses generally allowed in the two different zones. • Besides the differences in the allowed uses, there are some differences in the • development standards. These differences are shown on the following table, which is found in Section 18.530 of the TDC. Again, the significant differences are shown in bold. • • 10 • • • • P\0891.001.00\Docs\P1an\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • • • • • TABLE 18.530.2 • DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES • STANDARD INDUSTRIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARK(I-P) (I-L) • Minimum Lot Size None None • Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 50 ft. • Minimum Setbacks • -Front yard 35 ft. 30 ft. • Side facing street on corner& • through lots [1] 0 ft. 20 ft. • • - Side yard 0/50 ft. [3] 0/50 ft. [3] • -Rear yard 0/50 ft. [3][4] 0/50 ft. [3] • -Distance between front of garage • &property line abutting a public • or private street --- --- • Maximum Height 45 ft. 45 ft. • Maximum Site Coverage [2] 75 % [5] 85 % • Minimum Landscape Requirement 25 % [6] 15 % • • [1]The provisions of Chapter 18.795 (Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. • [2]Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. • [3] No setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning • district. • [4]Development in industrial zones abutting the Rolling Hills neighborhood shall comply with Policy 11.5.1. • [5]Maximum site coverage may be increased to 80%if the provisions of Section 18.530.050.B are satisfied. • [6]Except that a reduction to 20%of the site may be approved through the site development review process. • • It is apparent from Table 18.530.2 above that most of the key standards, such as the • setback adjacent to a residential zone, are the same for both zones. The biggest difference is the maximum site coverage, which is 75% in the I-P zone and 85% in the • I-L zone. Similarly, the minimum landscape requirement is 15% in the I-L zone and • 25% in the I-P zone. • • • • • 11 • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • • • • COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CRITERIA • • • CRITERIA FOR AMENDING THE ZONING MAP • This application is for a quasi-judicial zoning map amendment. The standard criteria for • such an amendment are listed in Section 18.380.030 of the Tigard Development Code, • as follows: • 18.380.030 Quasi-Judicial Amendments and Procedures to this Title and Map • B. Standards for making quasi-judicial decisions. A recommendation or a decision • to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application for a quasi-judicial amendment shall be based on all of the following standards: • 1. Demonstration of compliance with all applicable comprehensive plan policies • and map designations; 2. Demonstration of compliance with all applicable standards of any provision of • this code or other applicable implementing ordinance; and • 3. Evidence of change in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or • inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to the property which is the subject of the development application. • • CRITERIA #1 -- DEMONSTRATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH ALL • APPLICABLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND MAP • DESIGNATIONS • Policies 1.1.1 and 1.1.2 • IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES • • j. Light Industrial - Refers to areas deemed appropriate for industrial activities • which include manufacturing, processing, assembling, packaging or treatment of products from previously prepared materials and which are devoid of • nuisance factors that would adversely affect other properties. The appropriate • zoning districts are Light Industrial (I-L) and Industrial Park (I-P) which also • permit offices and related uses. • RESPONSE: The proposed zone change from I-L to I-P complies with the • Comprehensive Map designation of Light Industrial because the I-P zone is one of the two industrial zoning districts that implement the Light Industrial comprehensive plan • designation. Because both the I-P and I-L zoning districts are considered "Light • Industrial," the two districts are treated interchangeably in the comprehensive plan in virtually all situations. • • • • 12 • • • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • • • • 2. CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT • • POLICY: • 2.1.1 THE CITY SHALL MAINTAIN AN ONGOING CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT • PROGRAM AND SHALL ASSURE THAT CITIZENS WILL BE PROVIDED AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE INVOLVED IN ALL PHASES OF THE PLANNING PROCESS. • • RESPONSE: On behalf of the owners, Mr. Murphy sent out notices to surrounding property owners • and neighborhood representatives, posted a sign on the property, and hosted a • neighborhood meeting on September 7th, 2005 in accordance with the City of Tigard's neighborhood meeting notification process. No one called before or after the meeting to • discuss the proposed zone change or the proposed use of the property. Representatives • of two of the adjoining properties attended the meeting. • The property owners have made a good faith effort to inform the neighborhood and the • community of the proposed project, and have provided an opportunity for citizens to be involved in the planning process. Therefore, the application complies fully with Policy • 2.1.1. • 3. NATURAL FEATURES AND OPEN SPACE • POLICY • 3.1.1 THE CITY SHALL NOT ALLOW DEVELOPMENT IN AREAS HAVING THE • FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS EXCEPT WHERE IT CAN BE SHOWN • THAT ESTABLISHED AND PROVEN ENGINEERING TECHNIQUES RELATED TO A SPECIFIC SITE PLAN WILL MAKE THE AREA SUITABLE FOR THE PROPOSED • DEVELOPMENT. (NOTE: THIS POLICY DOES NOT APPLY TO LANDS DESIGNATED • AS SIGNIFICANT WETLANDS ON THE FLOODPLAIN AND WETLANDS MAP.): • a. AREAS MEETING THE DEFINITION OF WETLANDS UNDER CHAPTER 18.26 OF • THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; • b. AREAS HAVING A SEVERE SOIL EROSION POTENTIAL; • c. AREAS SUBJECT TO SLUMPING, EARTH SLIDES OR MOVEMENT; • • d. AREAS HAVING SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25%; OR • e. AREAS HAVING SEVERE WEAK FOUNDATION SOILS. • RESPONSE: • The property does not have any of the development limitations listed above. Therefore, • the application complies fully with Policy 3.1.1. • . 4. AIR, WATER AND LAND RESOURCES QUALITY • 4.2 WATER QUALITY • • POLICIES • 13 • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • • • • • 4.2.1 ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE TIGARD URBAN PLANNING AREA SHALL • COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE AND REGIONAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS, INCLUDING THOSE CONTAINED IN THE CLEAN WATER SERVICES' • DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MANUAL. • IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES • 1. In order to improve the water quality and quantity in the Tigard Area, the • City shall consider developing regulations in the Tigard Community • Development Code or instituting programs to: a. Increase public awareness of techniques and practices private • individuals can employ to help correct water quality problems; • b. Improve the management of industrial and commercial operations to reduce negative water quality impacts; • c. Regulate site planning for new development and construction through • the Tigard Community Development Code to better control drainages and erosion and to manage storm runoff; • d. Increase storage and retention of storm runoff to lower and delay peak • storm flows; e. Reduce street related water quality and quantity problems; and • f. Increase public awareness concerning the use and disposal of toxic • substances. • RESPONSE: • The development of the property will meet the City and Clean Water Services water quality and water quantity standards. • 5. ECONOMY • • For the City's Economic Goal, Tigard's comprehensive plan adopts Statewide • Planning Goal 9 which reads: • "To diversify and improve the economy of the State. "Both State and federal economic plans and policies shall be coordinated by • the State with local and regional needs. Plans and policies shall contribute to a stable and healthy economy in all regions of the State. Plans shall be • based on inventories of areas suitable for increased economic growth and activity after taking into consideration the health of the current economic • base; materials and energy availability; labor market factors; availability of • renewable and non-renewable resources; availability of land; and pollution control requirements. 5 "Economic growth and activity in accordance with such plans shall be • encouraged in areas that have underutilized human and natural resource 5 capabilities and want increased growth and activity. Alternative sites • suitable for economic growth and expansion shall be designated in such plans." 5 • • 14 5 • • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • S • • • • • • Findings: • Through analysis of the economic conditions which affect Tigard, the existing make up of the community, the potential for growth, and the city's interest in • assisting existing and new businesses to expand in and relocate to Tigard, the • following findings were identified. • Findings • • Proximity to I-5 and Highway 217 serve as incentives to economic • development in Tigard. POLICIES • • 5.1 THE CITY SHALL PROMOTE ACTIVITIES AIMED AT THE DIVERSIFICATION OF THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES AVAILABLE TO TIGARD RESIDENTS WITH • PARTICULAR EMPHASIS PLACED ON THE GROWTH OF THE LOCAL JOB MARKET. • 5.4 THE CITY SHALL ENSURE THAT NEW COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL • DEVELOPMENT SHALL NOT ENCROACH INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS THAT HAVE • NOT BEEN DESIGNATED FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USES. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES • 4. The City, along with the business community, shall develop an economic • development program aimed at attracting new commercial and industrial • development to Tigard while also encouraging the expansion of existing • business concerns. • 13. The City shall develop and implement an economic development program • compatible with the potentials and constraints of the City and will: a. Aid in the creation and maintenance of new and continuous • employment opportunities to afford City residents the choice of working • within the City; b. Strive to improve, diversify and stabilize the economic base of the • community thus reducing the tax burden of the residential property • owner; c. Aid in the effective utilization of the land, energy and human resources; • and • d. Provide for the timely development of all public facilities and services and their delivery systems • • 14. The city shall encourage the location and development of economic activities which meet the occupational and employment needs of all city • residents, particularly the unemployed and underemployed. • 19. The City shall coordinate its planning efforts with the Metropolitan Service • District and Oregon Department of Transportation to ensure adequate access • from major arterial routes to designated commercial and industrial areas. • • • 15 • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • • • 26. Because highway accessibility to designated commercial and industrial • areas is more important than access by any other means, the City shall actively endeavor to protect and enhance access to Highway 217 and Interstate 5. S • RESPONSE: The proposed zone change will facilitate a wide range of more employee-intensive uses S than the existing I-L zone, so the zone change will stimulate economic development and 5 will provide city residents with the opportunity to work near home. In addition, there • are positive economic benefits from the proposed office uses, particularly to nearby restaurant and other retail businesses. Therefore, the application complies fully with 5 Goal 5, including the City's own findings addressing Statewide Planning Goal 9 • (Economy), Policies 5.1 and 5.4 and the quoted Implementation Strategies. • The City has coordinated with Metro and ODOT in the development of its Transportation • System Plan. The subject site is located less than a half-mile off I-5, from the Carmen Drive freeway • ramp. It is also only about one-half mile to the freeway ramp at Bridgeport Road and S 72 . Highway 217 is only 1.5 miles north at the 72nd Avenue interchange. Appropriate 5 access is available for the uses allowed in the I-P zone. It is an ideal location for more • intensive economic development activities to take place. In addition, the redevelopment of this site will more effectively utilize the land, and contribute to the tax base, reducing 5 the tax burden on residential property owners. • 7. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES 5 POLICIES • S 7.1.2 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE AS A PRE-CONDITION TO DEVELOPMENT • APPROVAL THAT: S a. DEVELOPMENT COINCIDE WITH THE AVAILABILITY OF ADEQUATE • SERVICE CAPACITY INCLUDING: • 1. PUBLIC WATER; • 2. PUBLIC SEWER SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT S WITHIN THE CITY UNLESS THE PROPERTY INVOLVED IS OVER 300 • FEET FROM A SEWER LINE AND WASHINGTON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPROVAL FOR A PRIVATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM IS S OBTAINED; AND • 3. STORM DRAINAGE. • • b. THE FACILITIES ARE: • 1. CAPABLE OF ADEQUATELY SERVING ALL INTERVENING 5 PROPERTIES AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT; AND • S 16 • S S P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • • • 1111 • • 2. DESIGNED TO CITY STANDARDS. • • c. ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES TO BE PLACED UNDERGROUND. RESPONSE: • The properties are already connected to public water, pubic sewer and public storm drainage facilities, all of have adequate service capacity, according to city officials. A • detailed analysis will be submitted with the site plan, but a preliminary review reveals • that there are adequate utilities to serve the site. • Water service: There is an existing 12" water line in Upper Boones Ferry Road which is • accessible, and also an existing 8" line in 74th Avenue that could possibly be accessed. Ken Fisher of the Tigard Water District was not aware of any capacity or fire flow constraints in this area. • Sanitary sewer service: There is an 8" sewer line in Upper Boones Ferry Road, which ties into a 10" line in Durham Road, which then ties into a 60" trunk line that follows • Fanno Creek to the Durham treatment facility. There is also an existing 8" line in Fanno Creek Place. Greg Berry, Utility Engineer for the City, was not aware of any capacity • issues in this area, particularly since the site is so close to the truck line. • Storm water service: There is a 21" storm line in Upper Boones Ferry Road, which ties • into a 36" storm line in Durham Road, which then ties into a 42" line at 74th Avenue and • Durham Road. The storm water discharges into Fanno Creek near 74th and Durham. There are other storm lines in 74th Avenue, which may possibly be accessed by • connecting a line from the end of Fanno Creek Drive under the railroad tracks to 74th • Avenue. • Greg Berry did not think there would be any capacity problems related to storm drainage • from the development of the subject site. In fact, he pointed out that, with • redevelopment, the site will probably generate less storm water run-off that is does currently, since there will be less impervious surface. In addition, on-site storm water • management will improve the quality of the storm water before it is released into Fanno • Creek. That is, redevelopment should result in a decrease in the quantity of, and an increase in the quality of, storm water run-off. • • If any new utilities are required, they will be placed underground in accordance with City requirements (TDC Section 18.810.110). Therefore, the application complies fully with • Policy 7.1.2. • 8. TRANSPORTATION • • POLICIES • 8.1.1 PLAN, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES IN A • MANNER WHICH ENHANCES THE LIVABILITY OF TIGARD BY: • a. PROPER LOCATION AND DESIGN OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES. • b. ENCOURAGING PEDESTRIAN ACCESSIBILITY BY PROVIDING SAFE, SECURE AND DESIRABLE PEDESTRIAN ROUTES. • • 17 • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • i • • • • c. ADDRESSING ISSUES OF EXCESSIVE SPEEDING AND THROUGH • TRAFFIC ON LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREETS THROUGH A NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC PROGRAM. THE PROGRAM SHOULD • ADDRESS CORRECTIVE MEASURES FOR EXISTING PROBLEMS AND • ASSURE THAT DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATES TRAFFIC CALMING. • 8.1.2 PROVIDE A BALANCED TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM, INCORPORATING • ALL MODES OFTRANSPORTATION (INCLUDING MOTOR VEHICLE, BICYCLE, • PEDESTRIAN, TRANSIT AND OTHER MODES) BY: • a. THE DEVELOPMENT OF AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PUBLIC STREET • STANDARDS THAT RECOGNIZE THE MULTI-PURPOSE NATURE OF THE STREET RIGHT-OFWAY FOR UTILITY, PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE, • TRANSIT, TRUCK AND AUTO USE. • b. COORDINATION WITH TRI-MET, AND/OR ANY OTHER TRANSIT • PROVIDERS SERVING TIGARD, TO IMPROVE TRANSIT • SERVICE TO TIGARD. FIXED ROUTE TRANSIT WILL PRIMARILY USE' ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR STREETS IN TIGARD. DEVELOPMENT • ADJACENT TO TRANSIT ROUTES WILL PROVIDE DIRECT • PEDESTRIAN ACCESSIBILITY. • c. CONSTRUCTION OF BICYCLE LANES ON ALL ARTERIALS AND • COLLECTORS WITHIN TIGARD CONSISTENT WITH THE BICYCLE MASTER PLAN. ALL SCHOOLS, PARKS, PUBLIC FACILITIES AND • RETAIL AREAS SHALL STRIVE TO HAVE DIRECT ACCESS TO A • BIKEWAY. • d. CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALKS ON ALL STREETS WITHIN TIGARD. • ALL SCHOOLS, PARKS, PUBLIC FACILITIES AND RETAIL AREAS SHALL STRIVE TO HAVE DIRECT ACCESS TO A SIDEWALK. • e. DEVELOPMENT OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLANS WHICH LINK • TO RECREATIONAL TRAILS. • • f. DESIGN LOCAL STREETS TO ENCOURAGE A REDUCTION IN TRIP • LENGTH BY PROVIDING CONNECTIVITY AND LIMITING OUT-OF- DIRECTION TRAVEL AND PROVIDE CONNECTIVITY TO ACTIVITY • CENTERS AND DESTINATIONS WITH A PRIORITY FOR BICYCLE AND • PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS. • g. TIGARD WILL PARTICIPATE IN VEHICLE TRIP REDUCTION • STRATEGIES DEVELOPED REGIONALLY TARGETED TO ACHIEVE NON-SINGLE OCCUPANT VEHICEL LEVELS OUTLINED IN TABLE 1.3 • OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN. • h. TIGARD WILL SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMUTER RAIL • SYSTEM AS PART OF THE REGIONAL TRANSIT NETWORK. • • 18 • • • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • • • • • • 8.1.3 STRIVE TO ACHIEVE A SAFE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM BY THE • DEVELOPMENT OF STREET STANDARDS, ACCESS MANAGEMENT POLICIES AND • SPEED CONTROLS WHEN CONSTRUCTING STREETS, AND BY MAKING STREET MAINTENANCE A PRIORITY AND THROUGH A COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM OF • ENGINEERING, EDUCATION AND ENFORCEMENT. • g. REQUIRE NEW DEVELOPMENT TO PROVIDE SAFE ACCESS TO AND TO GAIN SAFE ACCESS FROM A PUBLICALLY DEDICATED AND • IMPROVED STREET (I.E., DEDICATE RIGHT-OF-WAY, IF NOT ALREADY ON A PUBLIC STREET, AND INSTALL IMPROVEMENTS IN ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY TO THE DEVELOPMENT'S IMPACT) AND • PROVIDE SAFE ACCESS. • 8.1.4 SET AND MAINTAIN TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MEASURES • THAT: • a. SET PARKING RATIOS TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PARKING, WHILE • PROVIDING AN INCENTIVE TO LIMIT THE USE OF THE SINGLE OCCUPANT VEHICLE. • • 8.1.7 IMPLEMENT THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN (TSP) IN A COORDINATED MANNER BY COORDINATING AND COOPERATING WITH • ADJACENT AGENCIES (INCLUDING WASHINGTON COUNTY, BEAVERTON, • TUALATIN, LAKE OSWEGO, CITY OF PORTLAND, TRI-MET, METRO AND ODOT) • WHEN NECESSARY TO DEVELOP TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS WHICH BENEFIT THE REGION AS A WHOLE IN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF TIGARD. • • IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 5. The Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and Tri-Met service plans will be the • guiding documents for development of Tigard's transit plan. The City should provide input to Tri-Met regarding their specific needs as they annually review • their system. This input should focus on improving service (coverage • and frequency) to under-served areas. New transit service should be considered concurrent to street improvements when significant street • extensions are completed. The City should encourage land intensive uses to • locate near transitways and require high intensity uses (i.e. large employment, commercial sites) to provide transit facilities. When bus stops reach 75 • boardings per day, bus selters should be considered in development review. • Sidewalks should be available within 1/4 mile from all transit routes and transit • should be provided to schools and parks. • 7. Develop a pedestrian plan which connects key activity centers with adjacent • access. Require sidewalks to be constructed on all streets within within Tigard. • 15. Develop guidelines to provide access control standards and apply these standards to all new road construction and new development. For roadway reconstruction, existing driveways shall be compared with the standards and a • reasonable attempt shall be made to comply (consolidating driveway accesses • or relocating driveways to a lower classification street are examples). • • 19 • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • • • • 18. Require development to provide right-of-way (if needed) and safe access as • determined by application of the City's development code and standards for design. Require that the minimum City standards be met for half-street • adjacent to developing property for a development to proceed (with • consideration of rough proportionality). Apply this policy to both pedestrians and motor vehicles. • • 8.2 TRAFFICWAYS • POLICIES 8.2.1 THE CITY SHALL PLAN FOR A SAFE AND EFFICIENT STREET AND ROADWAY SYSTEM THAT MEETS CURRENT NEEDS AND ANTICIPATED FUTURE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT. • •8.2.2 THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE FOR EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF THE • TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS WITHIN THE CITY AND THE METROPOLITAN AREA THROUGH COOPERATION WITH OTHER FEDERAL, STATE, • REGIONAL AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. • 8.2.3 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE AS A PRECONDITION TO DEVELOPMENT • APPROVAL THAT: • a. DEVELOPMENT ABUT A PUBLICLY DEDICATED STREET OR HAVE • ADEQUATE ACCESS APPROVED BY THE APPROPRIATE APPROVAL • AUTHORITY; • b. STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY BE DEDICATED WHERE THE STREET IS SUBSTANDARD IN WIDTH; • c. THE DEVELOPER COMMIT TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE STREETS, • CURBS AND SIDEWALKS TO CITY STANDARDS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT; d. INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPERS PARTICIPATE IN THE IMPROVEMENT OF • EXISTING STREETS, CURBS AND SIDEWALKS TO THE EXTENT OF THE • DEVELOPMENT'S IMPACTS; • e. STREET IMPROVEMENTS BE MADE AND STREET SIGNS OR SIGNALS BE • PROVIDED WHEN THE DEVELOPMENT IS FOUND TO CREATE OR INTENSIFY A TRAFFIC HAZARD; • f. TRANSIT STOPS, BUS TURNOUT LANES AND SHELTERS BE PROVIDED • WHEN THE PROPOSED USE OF A TYPE WHICH GENERATES TRANSIT • RIDERSHIP; • g. PARKING SPACES BE SET ASIDE AND MARKED FOR CARS OPERATED BY • • • 20 • • • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • • • • • • • DISABLED PERSONS AND THAT THE SPACES BE LOCATED AS CLOSE • AS POSSIBLE TO THE ENTRANCE DESIGNED FOR DISABLED • PERSONS; AND • h. LAND BE DEDICATED TO IMPLEMENT THE BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN • CORRIDOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ADOPTED PLAN. • 8.3 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION • POLICIES • 8.3.1 THE CITY SHALL COORDINATE WITH TRI-MET TO PROVIDE FOR A PUBLIC • TRANSIT SYSTEM WITHIN THE PLANNING AREA WHICH: • a. MEETS THE NEEDS OF BOTH THE CURRENT AND PROJECTED, FOR THE • TIGARD COMMUNITY; • b. ADDRESSES THE SPECIAL NEEDS OF A TRANSIT DEPENDENT • POPULATION; • c. REDUCES POLLUTION AND TRAFFIC; AND • d. REDUCES ENERGY CONSUMPTION. • • IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES • 1. The City shall request Tri-Met to extend service to areas within the City that • do not currently have service. • 2. In the City's Community Development Code, the City shall require large • developments to provide transit facilities e.g., pull-offs and shelters, if such • developments are located adjacent to transit routes. • 3. The City shall propose land use densities, within the Comprehensive Plan, • along transit oriented corridors that support public transportation service. • 4. The City shall work with Tri-Met and other transit providers to encourage • transit service for the transit dependent population e.g., the poor and handicapped. • 5. The City shall encourage its citizens to use mass transit systems, where possible, to make greater effectiveness of the transit system while reducing automobile usage. • 6. The City shall coordinate with the transit providers to encourage carpooling • and investigate if there is a local need for carpooling in the Tigard area. • 8.4 TRANSPORTATION FOR THE DISADVANTAGED • • POLICY • • • 21 • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • • • • • 8.4.1 THE CITY SHALL COORDINATE WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY, TRI-MET • AND OTHER REGIONAL AND STATE AGENCIES IN THE IDENTIFICATION AND ACCOMMODATION OF INDIVIDUALS WITH SPECIAL TRANSPORTATION NEEDS. • • IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The City shall require, through the implementation process, that parking • spaces be set aside and marked for disabled persons [parking] and that • such spaces be located in convenient locations. • RESPONSE: • The Transportation Goal policies and implementation strategies are largely directed at • the City, and include objectives that create the framework for ensuring that the • transportation system is adequate for all modes of travel at the time development • occurs. These objectives are implemented by the Development Code standards that apply during development review. Additionally, as demonstrated below, the proposed • zone change complies fully with the city's Transportation Goal, its Policies and • Implementation Strategies. • The proposed development will reduce the number of access points into the site from • four to two. It will also eliminate the driveway crossing of the railroad tracks. Access to and from the site will be made more safe than it is currently because of the closure of • these driveways. • The subject site abuts a publicly dedicated street, SW Upper Boones Ferry Road, and has • four existing driveways onto that arterial street. When the site is redeveloped, a • condition of approval may require additional dedication of land to meet current street right-of-way requirements. Assuming that the dedication is related and proportional to the proposed development, the owner of the subject site will dedicate the additional • right-of-way. • The development will install improvements, in rough proportionality to the development's impact. In addition, the development will pay transportation impact fees (TIF) that are substantially in excess of the development's impact on the surrounding street system. The traffic analysis estimates that the site, if redeveloped with 127,000 • square feet of office space, will generate 2.5% of the total traffic forecasted to travel through the Durham Road/Upper Boones Ferry Road intersection, while the TIF • contribution would amount to over 60% of the cost of improving that intersection with • another southbound travel lane. (See Exhibit `K', Transportation Impact Analysis). • The site is served by transit (Routes 38, 76 and 96). The uses allowed in the I-P zone • are likely to generate more transit ridership than the existing I-L zone because the I-P • zone allows more employee-intensive uses. The applicant will work with Tri-Met to make pedestrian or transit-oriented improvements that are proportional and related to • the uses allowed in the I-P zone and that will encourage transit ridership. Further, the • owner intends to have Tri-Met bus schedules available and displayed in the reception area of the buildings once the site redevelops. The development of the subject site will • • • 22 • S S P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • S • • • • • • • be subject to Tri-Met review and will be required to meet the standards in Section • 18.810 of Tigard Development Code that address transit facilities. • When the ultimate development of the site is proposed, a site plan that demonstrates • compliance with all city on-site parking (including parking for cars operated by disabled • persons) and circulation standards will be required. • 9. ENERGY • POLICY 9.1.3. THE CITY SHALL ENCOURAGE LAND USE DEVELOPMENT WHICH • EMPHASIZES SOUND ENERGY CONSERVATION, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION. • IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES • • 8. The city shall coordinate with and support public and private planning efforts that advocate alternative forms of transportation such as mass transit, carpooling, ride share, bicycling and walking for commuter purposes. • RESPONSE: • Employees and visitors may walk to the, bicycle, car-pool, take a bus, come with a • group in a van or bus, or drive their own vehicle. There are several available modes of • transportation by which employees and visitors can get to and from the facility. Further, when the subject site is redeveloped, the site plan will be reviewed for opportunities for • encouraging alternative forms of transportation. Therefore, the application complies • fully with Policy 9.1.3. • 12. LOCATIONAL CRITERIA • POLICY • • 12.3 INDUSTRIAL • The intent of the industrial land use designation is to: • 1. Provide for the designation of suitable lands for industrial use; • • 2. Provide for economic growth and development; 3. Protect existing and potential lands suitable for industrial development • from encroachment by non-industrial or incompatible uses; • 4. Provide land for industrial use by type to minimize the impact on • surrounding development; and • 5. Take advantage of existing transportation facilities. • Industrial lands are classified as: • • 1. Heavy industrial lands are areas intended to provide for manufacturing, processing and assembling activities. Uses within this classification are • characterized by large buildings and large storage areas and as having • associated external effects such as smoke, noise, odor or visual pollution. • 23 • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • • • • • 2. Light industrial lands are areas intended to provide for manufacturing, • processing, assembling and related office activities. Uses within this • classification are of a size and scale which makes them generally compatible with other non-industrial uses and which have no off-site • effects. • The land use map designates specific areas of the city for industrial • development. Over time, however, there may be a demand for new sites. • Therefore, the following policy will apply in making such decisions. POLICY • 12.3.1 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE THAT: • a. SITES FOR HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE: • • (1) SEPARATED BY TOPOGRAPHY ESTABLISHED BUFFERS, • TRANSPORTATION OR OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL LAND USES FROM RESIDENTIALLY DEVELOPED AREAS. • (2) LOCATED IN AREAS HAVING RAIL SERVICE, ARTERIAL OR MAJOR • COLLECTOR ACCESS. • b. SITES FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE: • (1) BUFFERED FROM RESIDENTIAL AREAS TO ENSURE THAT PRIVACY AND • THE RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER OF THE AREA ARE PRESERVED. (2) LOCATED ON AN ARTERIAL OR COLLECTOR STREET AND THAT INDUSTRIAL TRAFFIC SHALL NOT BE CHANNELED THROUGH • RESIDENTIAL AREAS. c. THE SITE SHALL BE OF A SIZE AND SHAPE WHICH WILL PROVIDE FOR THE • SHORT AND LONG RANGE NEEDS OF THE USE. • d. THE LAND INTENDED FOR DEVELOPMENT SHALL HAVE AN AVERAGE SITE • TOPOGRAPHY OF LESS THAN 6% GRADE, OR THAT IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED THAT THROUGH ENGINEERING TECHNIQUES ALL • LIMITATIONS TO DEVELOPMENTAND THE PROVISION OF SERVICES CAN BE • MITIGATED. • e. IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED THAT ASSOCIATED LIGHTS, NOISE AND OTHER • EXTERNAL EFFECTS WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE ACTIVITIES AND USES ON SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. f. ALL OTHER APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES CAN BE MET. • • IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES • • 24 • • • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • • • • • • • • 1. Industrial development adjacent to existing or planned residential areas • shall be conditioned to ensure that: • a. The specific proposed use will be compatible with adjacent uses; • b. The design of the facility and its site will not place visual or physical • burdens on the surrounding areas; • c. The operational characteristics of the facility will be compatible with surrounding uses and include[s] consideration of; • • (1) Hours of operation; • (2) Delivery and shipping characteristics; • (3) Noise; • • (4) Lighting; and • (5) Other use characteristics. • RESPONSE: • In compliance with the comprehensive plan, the site is located on an arterial street that • provides connections to other arterials and collectors without going through residential neighborhoods. The site is appropriate for the uses allowed in the I-P zone because it is • level, and is an adequate size and shape. The uses allowed in the proposed I-P zone are less intense than those allowed in the I-L zone, and the industrial uses in the I-P zone are prohibited from creating adverse off-site impacts such as noise, vibration, • glare/outdoor lighting and odors. The subject site is almost completely surrounded by • properties zoned I-P, so the proposed zone change will make the site more compatible • with its surroundings. • CRITERIA #2 -- DEMONSTRATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH ALL • APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF ANY PROVISION OF THIS CODE OR OTHER • APPLICABLE IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE • RESPONSE: • No development is proposed at this time. When the site is developed, it will meet all applicable standards of the I-P zone, including (but not limited to) compliance with the • maximum height restrictions, maximum site coverage, parking lot landscaping • standards, pedestrian access requirement and necessary right-of-way improvements. • The applicable standards of the development code are as follows: • ♦ Setbacks, front, side and rear ♦ Height • ♦ Maximum Building coverage • ♦ Buffering and Screening ♦ Minimum Landscaping • • Parking • • 25 • • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\fnaldr\9\28\05 • M • • Setbacks, front, side and rear. The required minimum setback standards are 35' • front, 0' side and rear, except that a minimum setback 50' is required along the side • abutting a residential zoning district. Any proposed development will be able to meet these standards. Height limit. When the site is developed, the buildings will comply with the building height limit of 45 feet. • • Building coverage. The maximum site coverage allowed is 75%1. The actual building coverage may be 80%, which is allowable under the Code if certain requirements are • met, such as planting larger trees and providing an extra landscape strip along the • street frontage. • Buffering and Screening. No buffering or screen is required. • Minimum landscaping: The site does not meet the current I-L requirement that 15% of the site be landscaped, so it obviously does not meet the required I-P minimum landscaping standard of 25%. Currently, only a small portion of the site is landscaped, • most of which is the area adjacent to Upper Boones Ferry Road. To meet the 25% • standard, 65,340 square feet (over 1.5 acres) would have to be landscaped, or 1.2 acres • if the requirement is reduced to 20%. • Parking: The parking standards call for a minimum of 2.7 and a maximum of 4.1 • parking spaces per 1000 square feet of building, which would mean development of 343 to 520 parking spaces, based on a 127,000 square feet office building. There is enough • room on the site to meet the minimum required number of parking spaces, including • vanpool and accessible parking spaces. • Impact Analysis: Section 18.390.50.B.2.e. requires an impact study as part,of the • Type III procedures. Following are comments regarding the impact on public facilities and services. • Transportation System: There are no significant impacts to the transportation system as a result of this zone change, provided certain improvements to the street system are • made. The traffic study completed by Kittelson & Associates Inc. concluded that traffic • operations will still be within acceptable limits if the property is developed as it could be • in the I-P zone, as long as planned improvements to the intersection of SW Boones Ferry Road and Durham Road are made. See Exhibit `M', Traffic Impact Analysis. • Moreover, it concluded that key intersections and roadways in the study area can • operate at acceptable performance levels even if the site were developed with 127,000 • square feet of office space, provided that street improvements will be made that will • mitigate the impacts of the development. • • • 'Maybe increased up to 80%if the requirements of Section 18.530.050.B are met. • 26 • • • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • • • • • • • The proposed use will generate virtually no truck traffic, unlike the current uses of the • buildings and properties. Further, all of the uses allowed in the I-P zone would typically • generate less truck traffic than the uses allowed in the I-L zone. • Drainage System: Storm drainage water quality and quantity facilities will be • constructed on-site in conjunction with any future development of the property. • Parks System: No improvements to the park system are required. The nearest park is • Cook Park. Little if any impact to that park or any other park should occur as a result of • development of this property with uses allowed in the I-P zone. • Water System: No impact to the water system will occur as a result of this zone change. • In fact, light industrial uses generally have less impact on the water system than heavier • industrial uses. • Sewer System: No impact to the sewer system will occur as a result of this zone change. • In fact, light industrial uses generally have less impact on the sewer system than heavier industrial uses. • Noise: The I-P zone generally should be a "quieter" zone than the I-L zone. In the • proposal, all activities will take place indoors. Further, there will be almost no truck • traffic, as most of the employees will arrive in automobiles or vans, not by large trucks. • Police, Fire and other Emergency Services: No impact to police, fire or other emergency • services will occur as a result of this zone change. In fact, light industrial uses are • usually safer than activities allowed within the I-L zone. • CRITERIA #3. EVIDENCE OF CHANGE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OR • COMMUNITY... • Several changes have occurred in the community since the property was zoned I-L (and • M-3 before that). • • The City of Tigard recently legislatively changed approximately 47.9 acres of land • zoned I-P to Mixed Use Employment (MUE-2), and another 25.6 acres from I-P to • Mixed Use Commercial (MUC). These properties, totaling 75.6 acres, are generally just south of Scholls Ferry Road, and east of Highway 217. Although the MUE-2 zone • is similar to the I-P zone, the I-P zone limits the amount of retail to 20% of the total • square footage within a development complex. The MUE-2 permits retail without such a limit on the total square footage, as long as no single retail use exceeds • 60,000 square feet in size. Similarly, the MUC zone permits retail outright, but • without restrictions on either the total square footage or size of any one retail use. • Because those new zones allow almost unrestricted retail commercial development, • they are essentially retail commercial zones now, not industrial zones. The proposed • zone change to I-P does not convert this site into a retail site. • ♦ Some of the properties zoned I-P have been bought by public agencies for public • uses. In fact, of the 773.7 acres zoned industrial, 85.1 acres, or 11%, are now publicly owned. This includes the School District administrative offices, the Clean • • • 27 • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • I • • • Water Services Agency sewage treatment plant properties, and properties the City • bought for parks and open space. 0 • Subtracting any publicly owned land, there are 688.6 acres of industrially zoned 0 land. Of this, 322.51 acres, or 46.8%, are zoned I-L, 316.05 acres, or 45.9%, • are zoned I-P, and 50 acres, or 7.3%, are zoned I-H. If the zoning on this 6.0-acre property is changed from I-L to I-P, the percentage of I-L will be reduced to 46.08%, 0 and the percentage of I-P will be increased to 46.7%. That is more clearly • demonstrated in the following table. • Table 1 • Impact of Zone Change on industrial lands inventory • Zone BEFORE ZONE CHANGE AFTER ZONE CHANGE • Acres Percentage Acres Percentage • I-L 322.51 46.8% 316.51 46.0% • I-P 316.05 45.9% 322.05 46.7. I-H 50.00 7.3% 50.00 7.3% 0 Total 688.58 100% 688.58 100% • 0 The difference is a decrease of only 0.8% of the land zoned I-L. 0 This shows that there is very little net impact as a result of the proposed zone 0 change, especially considering that many of the allowed uses and actual uses are 0 the same. (See Exhibit 'K' for a map of all industrially-zoned properties in Tigard, • and Exhibit 'L' for a list of those properties sorted by zone and size). Further, it is important to keep in mind that after the proposed zone change does not amend the 5 site's Light Industrial comprehensive plan designation. • ♦ The uses allowed in the I-L zone and the I-P zones have become more increasing 0 blurred. For instance, there is a lumber yard with outdoor sales in the I-P zone, and • there are retail sales in the I-L zone. There are offices mixed with manufacturing or warehouse uses. Many "flex space" developments allow a variety of manufacturing, 0 assembling, repair and serving, retail sales and services, wholesale sales, • warehousing, and offices. It is often difficult to tell from the outside exactly what the uses inside a building are, and they may change frequently. The strict separation of 0 uses into either an I-L zone or an I-P zone, in terms of what goes on inside the • building, is not as necessary or as simple as it used to be. • Changing the subject site from I-L to I-P is consistent with the trend in the area • towards zoning that broadens the range of uses allowed. The subject site is almost • completely surrounded by I-P zoned properties, and is in close proximity to employment and commercial areas. Therefore, it is appropriate to maintain the Light • Industrial Comprehensive Plan designation, but to change the site's Zoning Map • designation to reflect the zoning and uses allowed in the surrounding area. 0 • 28 0 S 0 P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 40 0 • • • • • • • ♦ One recent significant change in the neighborhood impacting this development is the • Bridgeport Village shopping center at Bridgeport Road and 72nd Avenue. Bridgeport • Village was made possible by changing the zoning on the property from industrial to • mixed-use commercial. That development has stimulated interest in the general area, and impacted land values. Land has become so expensive in this area that • land-extensive uses such as equipment and materials storage cannot afford to be • located here. • Within Bridgeport Village itself there are some small, service-oriented offices, but • not corporate offices. Between Kruse Way and Wilsonville there are essentially no office buildings with 20,000 square feet or more of leasable space available.2 The • proposed zone change reflects a maturation of the market, with a demand for • larger, Class A office space in this area. An example of this is the 100,000 square foot office building built by Opus Development on Durham Road, which has been • very successful. • .,..OR EVIDENCE Of A MISTAKE OR INCONSISTENCY IN THE • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR ZONING MAP • In the purpose statement of the industrial zoning districts, it states "the location of land • within each industrial district must be carefully selected and design and development • • standards created to minimize the potential adverse impacts of industrial activity on • established residential areas". Generally, this means that the lighter industrial zones designated on the Comprehensive Plan map are supposed to be located next to any • properties planned for residential. The I-L and I-P zones are generally found next to • residentially zoned properties. The I-H zone, on the other hand, is never used adjacent to residential areas. In this case, the proposed zone change will not impact any established or proposed residential areas. Most of the properties surrounding - and nearly encircling - the subject site are zoned I- • P. These properties were most likely originally zoned L-I in 1983 because of the existing • uses in place at the time, and the desire on the part of the City not to create non- conforming uses. The M-3 zone, originally applied in 1977, was also most likely applied • based on the existing uses. • As mentioned earlier in this application, it is not clear why the Elmo Studd's site was • zoned I-P in 1983, making it a non-conforming use, when the subject site was not. • Based on the zoning patterns in the areas, the property could have been zoned I-P at the same time that the Elmo Studd's property was zoned I-P, or later in 1988 when the • adjacent properties were zoned I-P. Excluding the subject site from Elmo Studd's • rezone to I-P may or may not have been a mistake originally; it certainly appears to be • an inconsistency in the zoning map today. Regardless of if it was a mistake, the response above demonstrates that the requested zoning map amendment reflects a • change in the community and neighborhood. • The City most likely has not initiated a legislative change to the zoning map in the past because of the existing uses, and the desire not to create a non-conforming use and • possibly cause a hardship on the property owners. Had these properties been vacant, or S 2 According to Kevin L.VandenBrink,Broker/Principal,Macadam Forbes, Inc. •ONCOR International 29 ID • P\0891.001.00\Docs\P1anApplication\finaldr\9\28\05 • • S • • • had they been used for office buildings or other "industrial park" uses back in 1983, the City most likely would have zoned them I-P. • Now, however, the property owners are requesting a zone change to a lighter and more • restrictive zone. This presents an opportunity for the City to zone the property to a • zoning designation that is more consistent with the zoning patterns in this area, as well as the surrounding development. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 30 • • • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • • • • • • STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS • The Statewide Planning Goals do not apply to this zone change application because the application complies with Tigard's acknowledged comprehensive plan. Nonetheless, the • proposed zone change is consistent with all of the applicable Goals. For example: • Goal #9. Economy of the State -- Goal 9 calls for diversification and improvement of • the economy. It asks communities to inventory commercial and industrial lands, project future needs for such lands, and plan and zone enough land to meet those needs. The • proposed uses will provide direct jobs, and also will have spin-offs to restaurants, hotels • and other businesses. Redevelopment of this site for uses allowed in the I-P zone will • result in more employees per acre than the current uses. Goal #12. Transportation - Goal 12 aims to provide "a safe, convenient and economic transportation system." It asks for communities to address the needs of the • "transportation disadvantaged." The redevelopment . of this site will improve the transportation system directly by making on-site and frontage improvements, by closing three driveways, and by contributing transportation impact fees to the City and County that far exceed the proportional impact of the development to the transportation • system. It will also improve access to the site and along Upper Boones Ferry Road for • pedestrians and for the transportation disadvantaged. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 31 • • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • • • CONCLUSIONS • • The proposed I-P zone is one of two zones that implement the Light Industrial comprehensive plan designation. The proposed zone change to I-P meets the • criteria for amending the zoning map, including consistency with the comprehensive • plan, compliance with all applicable code requirements and evidence of a change in the surrounding area. ♦ The proposed zone change does not negatively impact the utilities or other facilities serving the site and the neighborhood. ♦ The transportation system, with the implementation of planned improvements, can • accommodate the traffic that would be generated from the site if it were developed • as proposed in the conceptual site plan. • ♦ The proposed zone change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map and • Policies. • • The proposed zone change would not remove any land from the industrial lands • inventory, and would have a very minor affect on the total amount of land zoned I-L. • ♦ The proposed zone is more appropriate than the existing zone, and is •a more • consistent with the zoning patterns and land uses found in this area of the City. • • There will be little if any negative impact to the neighborhood as a result of the • proposed zone change. The neighbors did not express any opposition to the zone • change at the neighborhood meeting. • ♦ This proposed site is at a key entryway into the City, which is currently underutilized. • The development brings with it the opportunity to improve the surrounding streets • and sidewalks, add a significant amount of landscaping, and create a signature building that will enhance the image of the City of Tigard. • • The I-P zone allows for a broader range of more employee-intensive uses than the • existing I-L zone, so there are increased opportunities for a positive economic impact • on other businesses in Tigard and the surrounding area. • ♦ The net result will be an increase in the assessed value of Tigard, which helps spread • the tax burden, provides additional revenues for public services, and increases the • City's borrowing capacity. • • • • • 32 • • • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • • • • • EXHIBITS • Exhibit 'A' Tax Assessor maps • • Exhibit 'B' Site plan base map Exhibit 'C' Aerial photographs of the general area S • Exhibit 'D' Aerial photograph of the site • Exhibit 'E' Photographs of the site and access driveways • Exhibit 'F' Maps showing zoning history • • Exhibit 'G' Conceptual development plan • Exhibit 'H' Pre-application conference notes • Exhibit 'I' Record of neighborhood meeting • • Exhibit '3' Photographs of uses allowed or not allowed in the I-P zone • Exhibit 'K' Traffic Impact Analysis • Exhibit 'L' Map of all industrially zoned properties • Exhibit 'M' List of properties zoned industrial, sorted by zone and size • S S S • • • • • • • • • • • • L6 33 • • P\0891.001.00\Docs\Plan\Application\finaldr\9\28\05 • • • tax assessor maps (i' Exhibit A, • • • • • . • • • • 2S 1 13AB 2S 1 13AB II • Kt. 1°.' ..M >n'1 1 I • x•' P. 1 N !Y D ............ rte° _. ,�. r` ,� 1 � K° 2J, `3 Jh l0,a ,n. 1 WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON "° • / , \.. I wv1l4 raE114 c1101113.T2smww.•e. • -.1 S il. Jl �uum.. �_ > < 38/2/ 4 3 p 1 M A I x-IJ py�0 ° tpC{� E iJ° / P� .` L, 1 �1~ [ `••' e•r.• a •r'•`� °. /_ . :i e f ~ n 0O 1• ii `T'•• •1.r�. 1`(ra r a/ \G d \ +.�<_ .+r I + to ii�n to {. ra u 1 • ° • ate l .J 01 .7** 4 I,. - a. ii..10 g;.1 n ;» y .ra 9p .•„ aC a .. s �� •a 10 1 \- �Pi_ '»r xti:7• m e r_ m >e m 1 • ••,` •'`. 1, i• • • a6 (� ae y' ••a•;..n J is`ai 1 ai'rte#I.•��.`S�'Y P �QPy -=9 L'� 'on•aaraKau 1211113112 A?• •110 or -_._�..' - .i Q 'r .s _ —.7 ••••• `1 . r A t ' li. in mi we Ju' alt... °.r' �, 5 i ■ , i • 23-74 r. r _. ; . , ,; y �' 1 SECTION 13-- •. �.,� qM 1 0 a• l u oo a J•w��° e' ....Ta [ .r t 1 n�i• a CO CC +o m • y Q �Qa,.. I a .rw%f,., p 23-87 _•Jae - (Mi f, ' ' _ 02.0.101.222222.a,++awe 20. Ill { Ui Z611 an Q. i alI ' r. a.a:'1 ii l' _ 1 ;; ;1 CARTOGRAPHY • �: 5( j I 'ts1 1 I , a PLOT DATE:May 20.2004 ' 3 �) ' W.RASSESUSOUEA'JiJ1P�U1.P4 S£S . ,e 1 ' C' ONLFOH O iHO£R USE ON / • •.■, ,�...w....w .,......�.. 1 - r-� 1. .' I '1'.�' 1 DURHAM p • mmuna 2S 1 13AB 2S 1T13AB • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •:Ai 4 I '.. 4.1i.1;• ••ig14:-)60-1*:. . ' . , K - - • .1:!:•;. -..b11) , r,1------••....-,...3 tf 11:--11....;,:,,k-ujoilirl i'- .. r•-• L).......,:„,•:,.., •I VII/i-P el 'I •.f. r-i• •-..,.. I :1'i: _11 It• .....cm { 'ow oft*. e 1 . , -?I• r1 rill 1 , :•••4 t,,_..... 3, 0) • . lit ..t- ---- . , ■ 1 x . .0, ..1...... I, no I 1 4•:...-..-u'."1.0' .*: i ."...,.. , To- ..,.. , fr 4 ,,,.. .I 4 I Z• * I 7 f 4 • ul c• , ,• • -. -1-_-_---,... ,iigi#.„, ,-.1_...,._.r._„,_ _I._ .,__ ,. , i.., :i" * , •, .. ■-• u-, # vi • o ,„, 1 # -, .,,, I . -. •. I .3*- I . , •••,•,.. '‘, s I I ..- ••• :%• e1.• -;. II ' • -0 „ • ' ' 7 ; • 1 I 4 • 4 'I . I " . ,1 - i C ' 1 ' I ' -1.1! 1.!....." '- • 1 i g 4 ' , lc. `r• ..,,,,, 4' • I. r• I • ... I -r: • 4,. - 4' ' 1 4- , t 4 4 1 , , lb r ,....-: , ; I. • c • , • , . , 1 C ,... •. 747 ICR 104 AVENUE s • - _ . ........ ti ill - ' I • 1 ,-.> I■ .1. • 11 , ,...„ t•-'• 1 1 \ • 7.) ma I : 0. • • --S --- * -• ^I. - -,..P I ..t1 •:•P• ia• r - • ...-1 ':•77' ,„.. 1 , . rr• -1 '• ... 73 0 0 > l tj■,1 fil :Yit 1 I i:1§ i i‘, --.- .--- I • ••':',• i■'' I . , I •.i 1. ' ..a.., 1 sx ; .. . i O I ,' . I • 4." ; , ; -i.11 -- .4. I . -.. .... • z , • ' ---, ( ' Stv 72ND. ICR 12E4 AVENUE I , cn .,.... f3 I I 4 • it, . 1 t 4 2 2 (105 ...-••'-'---'..1 A.) to a.• I "..;,:i • . i 5 i :01 • .-trae:1 ......--**- 0 co Cr I 4s tt is 4-...-- ' _, .... 1 ..• \N. e -,--"-la'r " '. I .,!.• .., ' '.... fs.) 0 S. i • • & • • ••• 0 '1 t , -5A, •t, - 1 ■_ - --,-- a ,4' ti, • ••-o••.' idt. 1K •11 i!1 oSiP idt; ii)I I 8 i 8,1.8 ` N. C.■• ,',12' : 4..•.•' •\ tig 1 • i .‘ ' I , 1 , 1 . m ' • 11‘"•'''''' * •:`/— ••., • Iti .., :,, iv 1— "sr---rn 7' "" b,.. • a'a •ft M ..•'''. :::.• ga ___ , .-___ =- f? g 1 e 0-6 , P.. P a-. .... . % . t. , I 1 f I i- i_..,..A."1.____:_____L, . t ,t''-, .! ':'‘'''t. Ian°in i,1:1!2 ;;.": •z ‘: -ii i t - t t..a' a".1 .!•., a?. LZE : CD _. I ■11 I 1 i 1 '1 - ,q' .-1 Irl,k23%:•■ - ..f, ... it %•• et;.:-f.'») it R ___ .. — i r.) > 8 8 8 1. A a a .i.a .-; .......,#. ;me I., I • • 1 1 um 0" t a t ^ � \ i� R ■on 1 \��\ \\ / /�'�lG�g221 ' I \ 944 /' N ,cf'S 1 \ � q I ! 1 , z \ �\ \ \ \ N \ 'az „s - \ , 7 \ \ , b , \ "io ''I '44 \ 0 / N \ \ / O \ '7 \ 9 / �s \ s \ \\ 1 by / \ \ 1 \ \ j / \ \ \\ I / X J\ \\ 1�' ryro 1 / ./ I n° \\ n // \ \ y�n \ \ / / / \ \ -o \ / // / \ \ / / \ K ry_ Fb \ / / / �a o \\ ,o // / \\ `�� I t ` ,^dry /// \\ �. / / > �lbOt�JI�N ` s /`` / / rJ I �� Xv C `'__ I V, / c • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • "....•••••Ti:" •..."...T"'""."°`.:... .7.7 7 • : : • ::•:k.tt:, ...:,::n ....C., Ai.:1,,Ailkt... .,,,t4,,,..,'"'.'.:1'41it... ..v••• ',,4,y 14,..'•••'• f'.. . ......,. •Or"lit . at : -,4,40 .". - •••,901.,414.4.I.- - ,,.. :..•..i, .4: . .•:1,...,A . . 'e".e. ...- ..." " iiii....„:„._ ...„., • :i• Ale.er,...'-"IT,se,T/14,.. • EZ",,......1•,.. .!!"..4iie••0•4;••••'' .. ,.......'WeN%.4,:' ,Tes,:ii•'.;.'". ,:•••••;.4 i 0....'--t...t Itti: ..',4,:.•:.-....4... '-• w•:,.. ......-•••-::::-;;-.41. .--••••••'•‘.4 -T*1.•er... ll,•••••11.,24,- r... ...._,vr ..77.r....*. l'.. '..ii,+$!!'!1...'.r" .titii•,'zIr.V.+ . ';'+' .::''....• , '.•.... ....'''..... ........*iir •:".;;...k: .1,.....,:, ... ...... • . •••1 •111:444.t.'," ''''•••••• '..'T`•••it 341tILT,',,, -!!...... ,27v-...', *:...17a*.4','... t1.::i4 ...*:`1,.4•4.. .: . ....-.',....ki4i,11.. -....r....,... ..- ... .. .......: •:441...,. ..- , ;.,t; -. 'Li::: '7W * : ..,'14:•• •;.40....44.,...,.,. -,..... ,, art,.... .-•,• .14.0,,s.t,v r4 .•,'"-•'',1-11i,:.:'. ;;i:'....:'.'c,.::::,:l: ..,..• ':, ...:: . Aff*.4 - ,:k.„; •,,,• lit*.r. *.••ill.ft :'.:•.::-.7.:::'''''''....'44.7......'••.7. '.• ; r ' ..i.. : '. .;. li ..„4,,,4.1:•,...0...., t ,,,,,.,0, . , . .,..4 ...„Nouuir"..::::::::::.. .,. .....,..t.....:.,... k.4....:::.:.:.:..... ..:,.....4..,......„....„r...i........:.,....1 . . ., ..,,.... .........sr..:iiiii;.„ .. .... ... . • ......,....: „.... , .1i. i .s . . • 4. ......... ..••.. .'''''''.i.z",..--4 i • - _ • . .. -. . : ...,•. _ ...*• • :q '14. ....'"i'' .--. • 4 AI'kP; ..: .."1'...'::-.1" t• ..71!lik H--...:; -...",;••••...::!•:‘,..E.,... :. -1: 31:•;r1•••••.'•••*•... : '....,. • . ir•i'•.1. • .. • , ..**• '•' •:... : . .1i t• '. llit*F .*..2 •.2r. tt:•?."t.':•.•:..:••••• • •• • .** t x .... . • • !!rql ht • • ..... • ''....-.• .• -,••••'''• •- ••••• •• •• 55.'.C..... ..'...••.:. 141•Le.=,...,.:...i....,..A.i.ii ................:::;,... ..f.•• ,.• • • • ••• • .,.. -.. ..'-....v . • •• ..! •••4 i FT. f • •• •:••4•......14 ....I. • - ... ''r*:••'''.='. • 454' ...r...4. :, ..:'4.‘'1' ....-i••::..-1: ..4.••7. 1 it• ••••`••••••.. :•7•••,-...nti.... .:• •.. • •• '*, •1i...A'• •..Ar. i ,• <U.4, I ..4."•...- ....:7444,8.7.e.nri..., .. • •''.'•. ....... ‘t ..'.........:•,:::.........":44 :`,, •• •:;:.• .• . . • '::17 ........:!!!! 4..• .. . ,, ";:i.'4t . iiii ...•'',,,f•'".7,7'1... ..N •.•:::::." Wie..,•-•.............., ••••Ni.;.....:.• .... ,...,..._... l'•:•"taC-.•' •:101110 7.".•• •••••••'•71:7.'"i4r.--116 ,•5•.!:•',4041.40.: .- 't. iiii„.....;, :. .. .0.:7, : ••••..,••••• .•:.: -;::::. ..T •,:. • -71%••11' •,..*:!..,,.;;V:.:...,.. 1..y.iir!:,:......'..•lc .... .. •::•: . ••,..p.r..,.„,••. •4'....4ii41,10:37.....r.e.112;.•••:'':.•',• ••••'•.••••••: ,. ....g.,, •••:':.• .'• .1..1...--'..::".: ; IV' v'ii,•.;:: 1!1.;.:•'::::::.i.•;1110111W-11!::-,,ip.•••:•;....1 ' 1:•'•'•'...: .•:.. i:. •::::',..•14.;;;::.....,.....i 1•1•„.„.. -.• • .:...,•••• ..: •Aitiv:..rtkim,........•dr;IN,:::: . - .t.::1 1.:'Liu. ,,, r414 ...e....••...• .;lir, .1: . :".1 •:'..;4 :•::::•:•,. :.•'• •••!]..''. •:3 •i::'.. I: gA•14•0:S ..:...%-.Ler'''..-•';.it:....r", ...: ,....•.:::::.,....:•::. :.• : .... ...1 .i.....:•::•:'.::: i.:: ':':t:•••••••:.• -4,....4•4•44:Eilf:•••. * ' ••Z'r ..:. !..e..1111.•,ii,;f.,:•:.;.i.„ ....,:o: 1.14,-.......:..7.api,.%:::::.:.:f:41:::•4•00,::::?,g116:144:isill, ''''• -••••••• • -.:::. .-- : ,... •• :•••••• •:k:•!.: FIN .. E,...zif,a,....r-,9.,. .,.. :::::, .....:: :.:.- • . :..i•F.,•„...;i.........:...1':,........:;...,.........,.........:••::.„7:::•:,:'.;:::::alli‘Mr,t:LIAZ...:.:: ....,,,.. •,.:•111111,21:,•4. 11,.... ..., .... • . •rs:J.40.:!:•••Ti: 1.. A, ...•«........,... I it e,, ,.. .1 p: .„,:!.3§ .... ...,.....i...2*......:::::•,„...,:,--::,..:..too-7.--".- ...., . 7 Aim .. ato k!1;,„,07:=.. : 7.. -::;" :,..,1!:.4.4.1. 6.A...:.:,:k....:::,.41::Rillk., ...- .....g' • ' • k:.:.-. t, :r ii;P.... .:..••• 1...::;!!!:•...... ... :.;;;.. .. gip • At.':*"...7: 14"• :!'"*.t.••..::•e,;:::.?;:.4:'•:•"" 1.7.t.. ...7 4.... . • ... .ailir:' ........•..•:■••••:'•'::. . Jil1'..° ....:•*•••• .14...•:'........' : . .••••. ‘:=mg.i... :4, ,iftee•••::;.0•':•.;"'?.!:Ii4::!•::.• • ,,,i,,.•.1.,_,••••• be ..... , ..• • . ,•:",..' ! . • •... .......... . ..... . . . . . ,......._ • • Trig . ..... ,.. ..• 40,41 4:.: ....7..•-...-.91.•: !.: 1:.i., .... .. . ... .•::s. ::•:... ::::* • i. s••• 4,,,,„,•..... .... ... . . ........- O 1. . . ... . ‘ .: ... - r. .... -,,, ,:••••• •-::•.:...:•::•,. ..,,,.. • ::, • i 1 ...... . ..-„.... ,,„.„.........,....,.: •::•,......::.. ..: . Ag...., ..•::,,,:. .. \ .., . ...'4•• •• .. :.• • ..--••... kV.•-..':.•••):*•::••••.•;:; ..: 4.•:•;::•"1*.-v••4..•:.• .••, yli.:.:.•:..... -"" • ...:.• 4 . - .. •'••• . ,...,!:...T: •", ' "••• it. • •••.•• g . • ..:',:v •• "'••••%041.4e::' • . . ••:" ' ',0::::;4:::::::: .nat:5:.:: ...."•'..:?':At .• A O ...., ••••••"..f.: 444 V":10,•,...;,::. .., - ' . ii:V.,••!.„R., •,,A '....... ..0 ' % ' :". ..:: din.•.:n;;;:••:2:' • .' • , , '.1'Vaal!' . +19 • ir .. ir• ' • ••• i :.. ::1:.iikar ••.L .:.2.4::::.::iiiiimx••• ....: .• , •.!.4. :..: .. .:..1....) or•.....,.. . .... ..... .:,. .• • ::••••••• -. 14S...:... - ikottialfr ,. • .....•A..........I•L ••..,•;,.. • • .s> - immaphig:AP :1.:. . .. „. . „0. :• . :.;• A. ... ..:::""...'" •• %' .••••••• . ':• IV 1•'"•••• ... ..." .".• . ...-':%..•: ••... • • .. ..••. l'i• **** '--girl • ::••:: ••• .:• •.• ••• .•••.•.-2:46.Fahhi.ii: •• 1.1 .. ,,:::. '.. •..0ilkk. 7..'t .:.1...• gr ••. ..... .1.i,,,..::.1:" ..•. ••::•::111;:.::• :;::: INAllidd.: .. :.i.r ,:70.6..... •ii t• A.•c•,,:::::::::::...0.,... ":",.. ..„ ....• :. t .: ... w:•.*:•:•N.-4.. :.....: .. • ... . : ...,:.:t.:.: :.:.:r. Apoil '7 • ..; .... tt - " .• •:.., .if::eri *:,• - :. •• ItP,.. .• • ....,..• - • •••'::. • \• : 4r. .1.71I. • •., ... L.: ..-.. •4:: , : .::14-... ... •':'0,-. .....4. •::0,- . ., • . •. AO4 " • 44 *I I A ..;;;::::.::::.4er ,,• .T...4.- .; ....'''. ..: * WV ,.h: .'•4:it i: 7 .: .".1 '' '° ,• 6:: ‘"I' r.4.- • • ..*- ... Al '%. ‘1••....-r• ..`!:.:Ittie ::':. . • r .• T ., :. •: • -,., ' . • .• NI • , .. .:, .4 .7- ;,.. l'it•••••-:71"....7.,..••,.. •:01...• Li ' •:•,:.:::. I: " •• .1 ....•:;.••'::::::.. ... , ... '''a • • . • ... -4 . •.. ..X•ogr3 • 0..: .7* •:! : ,..0.......,..... .:7 .•••i.tor; .......;•10, . ... 7•.'• :. ;-.1, ..* .. •01' g• :::. ••' • v . - • ,.44!) r..ei '... i.,-.':'• e,,,,r• 14.1 - . ...............,.......i.: • ;::..:11 :. :. es:il:.•::•,. ••• P ,•::.... .- ,•.• '' '.. +4. ,"•,• ...• ...- lii.' - ..;:'• .i7....to............•,•, ..- . i, • .".....-::::: ::..: . 1 ..e.s.,:..!..* ',14f..:• . ,. ,:. •. . • ••.• .• •••-••••,.?,::•::$1.„40 ••, • 7...F.,.. . • 1• e.•:.: -.,. •:' , • •:• k .. 4•; - •• •'■ ;hi:••.•.-......,.. .,,.. i.„ '. '..4ri.P .• - '.I:' eV.; :: • 44::::,:'•"_„• ',1 . . . .,.'" P 1.' I .411). :. ' •.:: ••• *gate . ....... e • ..:: . - - ... . "•1 1,4,14• • •.: •• . s ,e•.:.. ''''''.. =i*,■1:1 1 • ',* ,•' •:••••••.",:•" •''......., .• . , ... i .,..CA‘i;;:' .,:9,. .. •. :'. '..; •'; ., •....:.. ..i. 4.:•: S•t.::::1 . •••• ....:•::' .".4.'W.::. ••..4111t.N:''' ..... ... •r•::::•.•r'/'1......;•••.,1:••••. .: . . . • . ' A• k. ..'0;7471.g: Noiv. '-' ' •ir•••••••-':r. :::.:.• 411 ,' . ' i •'.•• .isit., 4 , •••.,* .''''• = 1, •••=`•::: •47tilti•.?.......;:4•:••. '''''ii. .:::•1••••.• ••:•:•:•.' •..:.'''''' • .. • . -,•••1-..+4,-..• . ...:......?......, .ill: ......Z.... p.. • • •44r.••' 414 1.` l'''''f.A.;* ti,',15W.4••••••■. 1 ... .:.4:•'' • •• te,' '..i■ :111kgi..di*: • .., •.,' .• .,.4. .* ^1, i W... r•••' tittl ,_...• it .141=44.0&:!;•.,;:', t.'":"'".'••••7:' ,t•-..:. .. ....... - . - . • , '"'...• :•'i.::' •2 14:•......'!...1....;Aiiii.4:::.:114:4:1* ...64, ..‘••••••• . 7..." .F.-..;:: Pl.: 'ii-L•.••• .44., . ;‘:' ......j.'..... . .-...• •• • ..,. fflt+glilit.: 1 1",iirt21 Pr...,T.e49'"":••"..'"7-.1 * OF • •••.• •1•••• • : •••• • '"":• , ..- .. , 4.44.......... Al 0 1 • I 10 • • I • • 6 W W • r 7 * • • • C 1 • • • • • 1 . ....... . ..,..tpiliO!inii,..:;::,x;;ii?::::iiii ;' :....c..: :.k......Trs'....:if..1.j..'.4... ipi:?:x...'i:....'..':'...4..........:i ...,..,l'i..,.'......*:'.:.;.... M.1 .... . .. ':cig .: ........ in i \ ..+N. ilitti...,:i....":1 '+'...... .4 ,::d .: . • .-• - •igl:.. i. . . ifi:i.:4:::'• 0 ) 1• % :...1,:.e• 'I.,.,• :•••Ai% ..„,.. .„.„„:.:::.:::' . ..::..' ...1.,A)....„..„.i.......„.„.:........ • 111:::::: 1.! • .••a . • „., •• . .1):. . li:: '6 . .. 4...:.1.:::::::.:.:1- ,:. ....!.0iii!. t. , .. . .. . ..•:....:.::=A:• • .1. , E,,..., , ::111:1•:,._., %:.•1:::1: .. . .•::.!. ki:::•:.!'•..i.. : :11PrIZT. ! .• ;• I':i li ....) Kftigt112::141,.. 3: "" •:••••••• .::1 1. :,.• ..,:r;::•: :•:.:...:.,,':•■ •:;i::.;:.• ....:.. ••: 4 _ . • •• ••. ••••••• • • ••••• • .:.... ,...... .....:,-... :,: • ...„:„.... . .- ••• • . . . . ......... .. ......- ... ...":""....-...4:11 , :..., - I•: o sr gar,,.., ... 4•., •• A .::.i:::-.,..:.::::::::.:.:.::: : .,..,.. I Z- - ---. - • -- 70...::::.Pikkddl. • .. .. ..• ...,:•,;:-.::::•pt.., fi .) . -.„:••. ... :: ...-,,,,,,•••....;•,...,.:15.:641116,k..:::!:Piii;:n.:.:... • • • ..:::":" • .••• \N.- .-..+4•4: ------- •••••--••• • •• ••.:::'••• .::.... 9MilnarISI7 Vijklahaq:1:::yul....AMMIMISI.nq . sl) I.:::*........:+4:'•'•'.:••::•'■416,,,,Pi!!9!:••••••••• ..: .:-..--'1,.11::rn::::••••' •.....•;,:::•:"117..17.7*41:;::•■..:■.:....1::•,....-".., \ ..::•'10611111:E;:. :::. ..;••• •• .::..:.:.::.::"...:.4::::.:;;;;:41.1.T4tyrMnr■l!t!7::!:!!:::•::::.:1::•y:i::::,;•:::::•::::.....,•r:•:Trgi:p ::...•:::::i 104 .S3' i 4, ••:::' r:7111P74-77: . ..4!:•11::•:.•;:.4'.! •••• ?''''' • •-••"S•r•- AL ..••-.;..:ZN.:7111107- ;•••49‘;01;111#;;:;;.: "7,., .-' .::.,.!'::::,.:.:" :•,•:•,,,::. •••.:...:..........__.. ............,•....,,,,,, ... ,,,, w 0 .I.0..i.did.:•: 1.- .:••: .... . :::::::::::::::: 1 .1 ,i ii„ 1.1 1„II'j 1 I.01..1 .•:::4:: .0.(;V•k::: th :Is,. • ::...z. I::.:hi'I,. :::::::::1::::.' A• "--•'.......,:,:::::::.: \k?'1 ,..., - C s-- :14.1t.i:::.... ': ,'""4:111.:::::.::::::::L11::::::::.::::::::..:::::...kiiiiih1::::::.„••••:g.:....••••••.1,1_,.....•:,•• ....,.,..„,„:. )s..t.:::•. •• ........,,..:.::.:...:..J.,.,.....:.•___.---- - :. i,1.11 1 tvy 1.1 i: At/la 1 ......... a 1 .., ........ 1 0 •••.:. i:...ter""lifiliV7.- "9:::::::Iiiibi:::::::::::::ii:!:::14F2MA:iliikr:5!:-..., •...„1,,,,, ,,p.....,. . ;,..!.:::.•::..::...-;::'-•-• .:. I •:•::-.•. II CD 42) :..; : i!11:74S.7" .•• • 1 ti...2.: ....hitrw-Asti:tr ir 11 1:..29.::::::: .....: ....%....,,....•%,::::,:....:•:.:.( :::_t ... - • ::•:.11. -: .7110.71:4,01-.',..;*,i,(..42::::flio.i,:k. ..:,..... ..... ....:::::::.:.,.'N'i • ....1 • •1 •... ' Xi::.2:::;:. . ) ■, :-A:::4 ;iii:.:1:ilgi::;.• !:14:1■"1.•....• :IP ..".iii..1.r:iirin:Pi:i1:::;:::iiiiiiiiLia...4.:.\• I ... . . - •.• .115ta«::::::::•t.11::';::' .•:+4,;1:!!,..": • , r=7...1:MI° *10,0'4"110:„F•i k;•: • , 1.::!.:::::i:f;.::::t:t.:•• NiN.:› • :4 : .i'::•:::.... 1 i• linr: ■ :;r::4 qt •,• ' 1::••ii:i1::::::::: . ;I:1.•!....:d•,:::::::00.1:4:4:01: „ ...•:0.::::1:::e., • • ......4....s . • , :::::::. • : ...:•:•.::•::::":: ■:';•1111. ..q. . :.,:. F"1:144.... ..4.:. ., .. . !2:1!:.'.i:••4...:1•:t. •• .t. ..V :N":1•:: • r 11.111 ;.. .' • I gilt •+,,,v. • .,:ii :: ,:::..: ,, •••:.:::::isi.•• : • 0 .::. •• rIliiiiii : r.: . .::.%:•...,...•:,•:Ti::: .• N..v,'• "...., .• : •:: • 11/Er.. . . "4:.•': • ••'• qiiiii::.. ':rei:;:': ' ./ • -••• •• .:•:. 1E4•••• ".. ..:::.. •:... • ..'• RI:MEL:•s.' 1.:Ni;:, • , .- r-: 'f'•t..rs. 'rm.% , ......'4 ... ....i. ).‘...j..........,.. ..:., . ............i......... . .'r, 14. ... . ..* '.. A ... ••$•..:#' ..- A 4601.. A F rr•Pl' 141L••:'::;'?.k.'''iiiiirliglibidiiiiiiihif 1,.. A A. . '. A.•:•.'.i.:::.:.i.;:.::::'4.' ... ::•i::::•::::. •••,.qigiii:PIPMENP"'-••:11.12:1401111:111:5111:Elf. • +...• + ..'.... ,,.!...•.•L. '''' • ' ..1:::i•:;:::::.1,.• 'ii::.. :•:::•• .4.: •-.' ::••••:.:::::: - --- "PsCial"VVI ' •Ii••,1 ::::.:::.::: •'b;ing:41.:1.1.1:',::. .. 11:...:.1:4.:...b.0:1;11:IF - ••.. j., .. ... .:.1.1141014fialliiiiiiNNIF .... 1.:'• e! ..,...r:',...., 1.. , \ .. .. •7./.i.. • . .. •41. •.:•. .....:: f...... " "Fn:'"151:::::::,10:• • 11. .„: y.... , ,,„ ...., ,,, . • ,• ... •• 1..k...'• ° ••;•:....., :::.•:., •%.-:'•11,1; - •.• "• • . •.:I. IN•, 4, • •••• • •i• • •••':. .•::::j,F: . ::::::: •• ...••.!••• .:•••.' il• 9.4 ••• 1::: 4! 4 *: i• • \. •••• • 7.:. ...., • • • ....... I: ... .:.• , • •• . .‘.• •• ...!•::%. • '■,‘ . •11,' - 1 .1••.' .....• i \ ..., . •::e. ••-i'7,•-• •.......!'. +-•• '.., ‘•.....t.N..., ,'''..',.•:•••••10".. •••• .•:::::::::::willi,..--1,1.: :,.;. .•,..•••1 rir::: : , mi,. • • •••••:: . : . , , • 1... ' • - •••••t ' ....:.:.:....... ....• . ,,,,,.... .,v. . ,... .•:,..............,A•••• :.... :•i•,„ ...., • F. -... , .. . ',..•••••••••••::••••••••••;.:. ' • ••••••••.....„ki-: .....„... ...:4.•. .• ....iiir, 4:4:: P,..1 • •••:•.' ' '• •••• Hnif•1:1:11:14,,,,y,44,:14,44..Nir.:2„iiii,,,:9:.... • .•• • . dip . 71.I. 4 • •• • : ..•` r- . • 4,...0...sid ••• • • • •■:41. • ''•.:. , ..• •• . .:...... .<- : ::. ..• .. . .. . • •. • ,•;,.....:.:,,,,::::„..„.... ::...„.ifoli.:1.....O. .. :::!il!... :..:••• .... ... ...-:• ...........••.............•.;..., • - .... • • !Ii8,"1:11.1i.4.1 : • - . Pirt:i'.'"'!•,'`, ..„,......„. ... 1 t- •• . • ,...,:,'..,..........:::.:.%nil% ',..... . ••:.• ..,....1:::::::•:. ... .,....... . • ..,........,•"...\ qr.. •-040,:::::::::::•,.:•.... ., • ,..• '.••••,...,.....:1::.•••• , • likEl• ••:•••• ....::::::::•:::•:•:•• .s•-: ............ . .. ..•• ,.„.... . . • .,.. . .... 4„...,,,,,,,,,,,, 4.... ....„,,,,,. „. •••. 44. .,p, , .••• ,••e• \ • ••• •• \ ."•4••::':•••'•••:::••::•::• 74tdil.: • • .014P.: ..: 111, de ••••••••• ••• • ••••''''‘'.•• • '••••N'g'04110f.4,1...x,••• ••••• ••• , e , •••• ..„:„:„..,.. • • ... ...„.,:„ ..„, ... , ....„ ... . ... . .. .....:::::\,:,..,::::),„. ......:,,:::::...... ... 11 •, • .. :•::. •••44.•,..,,,. .,.,•••%+•• .,','•,.........N..;;,•".. :•••/ .......... ...••• si „,, .1:•• ..• ...t.- •' • •• ,,,...---. 4,0 • 7• '..'0...+.':•• ....!..14,&A, .. ••••• . 4 ....:::::.*:. 41 ...!::::•••• lr'''"ii.i..., ......i.........•Pqii...r1:1•... ...P.:14. . ... ......„. .. r. .•:4i.:•:•::'".P...!: •.:::4):::::: • •i..."!:::....: .::::.:"P'.. .: tr-....!....., ., ■1:.::•.•:•:1::•.:::;.:...::eli:.,::::*,•:•...:"... :•.• • "".' ,'at., 4,...••••••••.:•.... Nt#S •li:S.,. , . •••,::::::::.‘ A .. 44: ..• ....:...: • 09..::::4o• :::.:•:011- ' iii.........i........ • i ••:.•••... ':11:1:101:::::•.:::.:: ...• •:', •-•: ::.::.::•:.. 4.ki• ... ::::46 ''' 4............ii....... f ...' 4:•:,:i::.... ......... „ .:1:1...1.::: • ..,... ,..,, ...,?....,,,••••••,,•„:". :::,...••••••••1•••••.. -.4".•••;::. •• ,,,, • \ -:' •..:io . ...::. ...44.:!n....r. :,:';,) .0.,;(;:.... :..r::' ,* - ... •• '..N.• °•'.....,.'...i11.•••:::?.1i.1•11,•••' •1::'!.,... :•:.:.::: -4.2 te,......it •: ...,„4•••••••• •tk.... ..,:::::::::::::.. . „,t, ,,.,......, .........„.•... ...... .4,"*...:1,4:iy.„...1p,.......,..kii::::::::. is, , • •• ,,,,.......• .1....• ih..:.... .......... ....... . ....:::::::::::•::•••...:.:• ..: ..• : . •• ..... . 7 :f, 71.1,-.......•:. .0,...,:e.:.. :....5.,.. .,..•••. .:,:„....::::.•":.:'., •,.::•.•,•:.••••:.•:••.,:•,:..•:.•:::i''Ai:i•:,i:.is:I,ri,t'iF•:•l4.•++•i:.•V::•:i.•.•:v?".•:.!...r..•e.....•:.-1..i•.:.rv-..•:-::.:•:;•4.•.•:•"•:.,:':::::••:..1,1::..:,:.::::.,:.P..:,f.,..'.-..l..:-..:i 0••r;::•..•.7•:..0.:.,.?1:.:••4..•:s.:.::d::.:::••:::•:•6.!::‘.;t:;4;!.g:fd.1i.:i..0e 0A.:••.:•,;•:1:..-4:.o!.;g.„-17;...;:.;.;. :.:..„:..:..:• :9:.•:I•..•..::.••......,''"..........:I.:...;,..•.. ...':.....'..„-'.6..4• :i,•;.........,•.:,:1.+...,1•...:•..•.::."„..•...:...,1• ,11i:•.::::•:..„.„::,„:.:i,:.:..,.:.!..::9i:::o:p::.:.:,::..'.:.....•.;:.::-.........•..::.:,...-:,;..,:.:,.-„."..:',::.::.,...... • • ': .' -'•46, .,:••1::'::••.•..::.:'..,.'..h.:::::•.•:-„.:.1:,,.•,..:,•.,..:,.:.::.::....:.:s2 . 4 / l i:1::::•:•:•...:...: ..•....•,... ....z.....•••..-...v..::•i,.:::ii•....v:..:.0.:.:4..../:,...••.,1.:4,.1..:.:,..:..:,..:..,.:.,....e....,,...1....•::....5:7„•:.:.%.•:.••-....•.:.::.....::..•i,..::„••,i.g.•.•,k•:.••:.0.:::::::.::,•••.:•.:•.:.:,:::::•..:•..•..•:...:..:::..:::..:::.:.::::..:4.:..,.•...i..,•.::i.."•,.....•..,..i:-:-...•....1....t..........,.."..... ••„•.1:.4:.: ::.::.,.::.::•. " ....:... . . ...•.:!•. I ... :..;j:1,•:.. ..., L A . ..., - ,..!. ;.!.......: •.:: . ; • ... . ...... • . ..:::::: tfr • . . . • • ...•-•••••:..:::::+4.. ; •:••• • •.... • ..-... ."' *14.:"C1.•::::41 ,.. ... . .. : . • ..:,.1: .....• . • .......... .....••....• :,,,, ...., , '''' g • • • I ' I • -e• --- -,..-,- :rik • 7 "'" 1, ,, . . • .4„ 1-7 • 17 •It: .i::: ,+.I: ,+.• , 1 0 0 4 • I . . • . -, . .. IIit,i ,.:::: - :NE :1: ,I,,J:, ,::::: •tv:. it,f, , ,,I • ......::.:::::..: • .... ... ••:.• ...- ::: ..•••.......:7- ).. ....Mur..!.M.• .. ::......: 4 '..::::. ... F.:::: ., .••••,......1:1:;:::1:1:1 lir" s.,.. . • - A . . . • I .. • • • • Ats,. • :... • • • 1:.:::0:..' ' ••i'f • -.7......11F: • . . . ; 1 ••• "Si H;i..;:.. ....!•••••.:i-•.;.;.iiii& '. r:::":•.::.... •-- • •::::....??...,i. ;:.'S- ••• • -.:•4.5. 4: •• • • ,,,.. . .... . ... . • 4 . •.7 . I I i • ' :4 4 !: :•114601 ::::.n••• • • ' :...",:•:y.iii,:.;.:44.....,44, . '' ..:.••• ' ''• ., _.t.. ,,,pit, -......,,,,, .--- - . ....., .. .-•':: •::..xik:::::: • 4 ,:•• ... .4• . . "• • .,,,. .. ..,. .. _.._ _ . • ••.. .11..1 . r _.. 'IL:- -- • • --: ..... . -.•:_ k 4..... LLa, 44+7.1.: • -f•• • '•iiii•Iiiip;,. • . . glt ' •---4;*. 0 . .. .' : : 4 OF:',•-•;kkj....!!:.;:::::F.r:::......:7:-:::::;;..:iirl'r . _ ..... -:-. ... ••• . . ..‘ii41:1.1:.°• •:.. .,, 7.-1:-.....,... 'viti."' .0....:::11 • '••••''' • ::::::',....f.iiiiiiii:::::::ii::::;::::::::1•Iiiil:....... • - ..4`u""'''"•• ,........,....:........ . =...141r4; • ' : ' ..: .:P .••:•:••.. .:• a. :::::..7 ....7.r.r***:":.,-.':•*:.;:•::•::::•::. .::•''.'':":%:%•••:::::.:.:::.::::::•:•:::::.:!..:;;;;;:..:;;;;;;;;;:;;;:;;;;;;;::...:.......:................ ..,_.. ...?.........7:: ' gl.‘04!..::,..::::::-::7 70 • • :.... *lop „. . . .410. iiii::::::..1....... -":"..::::::•:•:::::"'.....:.......... r:r..".!: . ilqiii;:iiif:;....k..;.::............:..: .. ............;;;;T:':- ... . ... . . .:... .,-- ?&H!!!::::::'....,:::::....................?......ii;:....i.MI:Iiiiii:....... . -".....! :':- r .:.:„... • •• ,•••:•::.:.: ::::•..........:................•• •............ .... ......, • •. ...—.". .• • • . • 1•::::::: . . .... . ..••••. •••••••••••••••••••.........,:yili,..i.r.... •,.. 1:::::v1::::::: .......ifimy..........,.,•..,....•.....:::::...:••••••........••••••••••••••... •.:.::............. ..1 ... .: ••, ... ... • ., .., . . ... t ... ... . .• . . . ot,4'. .. • 1.!... .44 410i0511 ....-11... ''"7---•:•,:::,/,..::::::::,•:1.°. :::....: 4: • 4,.....,!.... . ••:::... .. •• , , - .- .. : . 1.. ..... .,,... • 1:11.... i'Vtit4 • '''::....:•. ...?f• : •'..:,..... :..••:•,: . . . . Fr . ... • • ••■•:. '••• •• •• .31:::::::::::. "' ' . ..M . ...•••• .: :.:. :::11:::::::••:::::::::::: .1.41.. „.},...„. ,;•::.....r..:*.... - :.... .....1-4.!...,*.i.-.,?;.....•••• • .....,......-4iii••• • I ........'-'..."..r..---- il..........:.....— ....:.6 ...: ...........:43::: .........igi..i.:7No*kg,p.::::::p ,..,ii.i.,:.-. ...,.... .-7.,...... ...-.,...........::.::.......:::• .. -• - .-::•:::!:::::::::::•:..:..... •. :••••to.g ::::::::,!::• :: . • • • - •.:...--..-....... ., •-'ilivg.::::••••••:::•:......• •.:•:,::::Lit,,,,,:::::":----::":10::..::::::::::::•::-:!..:::::::%.'':;:::::::;;;;,::7--...............:4;j1:::A. ..... -.. .... - :. ..„ c • ..- - •i.:::.:::::::: :.:.:.::•::: • •••'"-• ..'..•..4-'::::•:;.::1 !II:P9AfP' :Ei;4:::iiiAini99:1:111!!!!:::::::::::::::::::.:::::-..,:no:::-:-.. •:::,;,...., •- --:41`" - -' ....II-• • ••••••-••• .::•:::.::::::::::i .:1::'•IF.::::.•••:.:,•::,::::, .... •••:••••41.:::Ig .:::::-.:..''':"":-----.."....:....::::::>•••••••......::•:..,-;:::::;11,::::::::::::1' :::„:„......„,,,,as::::•.:*i„.•71....!...,. . :: ..........,:::: ••"4"•!r-Irl ......-. ' . ::.:......::•:. ..e:•::::`..4.0,11i4;iy.:::.• . • ...• • • 1:::::::..:•:!...! ....4-11'.F...4...•:••.7.1.i.,:i:L11"' ,!..k.... •••...........!!: . 12,,,.„4.,:....i.,;....,,,,..;;:•, ,...f....... • .. • • • . J.* .,,,, . ...... . ,... •••• •• .* '•':•.•'''••<:::••.•;•1.... 'J.'. .. ,.. . • .......... - ......... .......,. ... .., . •••• ' ••:;•-•h•Ild .....1.-. .1.1' '. . ;......t.•• 7:::',„;: ... ....• • • ••••:: •.::, • . —.... '11'..' :.!•!:.:: : • • .•. -......1, ,r • .:...-:, •. .. .• .6..4 i : ...I . • ••'''' - .•••••••••?-•.° l',...- c4.4.1: - :...,..-.. ilIF:•• ••••••:. 1 ,1...1••••7 -.. .- • lir .:•:. • ...E.:a:. :• • : ...,....,•••••••.:•••••••••••:,..-....• 1::::•:•:•••::: TqToo.t.-:•..,7•,- •-#1110-404••••••••:•-F.:•••:•..*•••••:•• - :: .. • •,• ,:,:a.•4404, I- z.,.•••• ::••• ,....-... r.:= .:. ......s..E.:. _ ..,..:R. :, ,,,......,.,,,,,.4. r . ... • !!!". : ,:- :•.% 14.•:':1::: .....::::4i:::::::Iii•::••••:::::::,,:•••.....;•:.• :!:,:!!..ill.• . .....'.:: ....,• •-•'.' .-. • , • :I • ...-.:- .: -7,!•:::!•::. ::• '' I f - • lir. - ::•• -. ... .. . • — ...a. • .....41.1..;;104 .. - . • 1. • .. • .• "..-.4.:-... 1:• .:.. .H• ...• .. '. .' •-• -;91.._...-1---r.:-' ..,..., ! .,... \ • ...;,... :4.,. .. iv:. ____....„„.;.,„-- ::,0 . .: ..F7: ,...t!'.7.7", ''''" r-.•- . .- ....7.".•••••••• N.. • !..V... H.-. ..... , .. — - . . ........ . ... .. .1. • • - • •• 114111111kik k .. .... .. ..., ..... :„.., an,..,... .,. :..- . A .... • — • --, - : .4•••••::, - • '''''' •• ' '''''':':14ii*Ill. . .°'' •si - t.v.:4-,. ...--••:--.........:,„,.•.... „„ • • . ititri 4,.....i.; .... ....., .A.„.....4....4-41.:2:,?....:,.. ... "....„ ,... ....... . . . . „„„... . . ...... ii„....... ... ,..., f,...4.......7.........., •• . ......,„. 1 . . . „. :Nos,........: 04 40 • 0 i / • • I ' • • i .. 4 • • 41* ........ . . • ,-, . ii.....,*•• .. ..• ---,.. ' '." . .. AlitaiLi ••' .• 'itvi.94***- . , .....te •. i'.j..:' • . - - • •• 4•• ..*... .• a '''1+:$'1 • . •. 1 M . •,. , :: . ..q.rf:% •...?.!. •E:. ::::!:: ' ..;..' '.. :\la:.'i '•''' .-..,I:1 if . • • - • .. . . •• -4. - • • . .7.• -;' - :::-7:::' . •„ . • • . .4 4, ••:•0.••••.: :. .... . . —. A: - 4.1441•4 - - 4 r . . • • • • a .,,,....- [ii32.:0.:!.i:::1 ••••- - -....:',"47 .:,-... .. '.../.$,:::7.' • . •:.... . „.... ..N,...";5.- • A i . — • ..: • :IIIsl'iI.(:,,, r.:r....%::':::r. ••• ' -•••• „ ..........:•1'''' • - .. . ....... :::111.1.:':::: • •.• •::•4::.7.-ei'::• '''''''' ...40,' :, .....1 Ir.'• . ' ..•u..• ... .:- ASI: . . . ••..........''''• .........,......,... ,.., ... •,•::,:-: .4., <,. .. . • : •.. . - I•II: .11111111:: • •f alp::::: "" -.. ..• i'-f•.• 2011111 ...-;' .:••::U.::•; = .. ..........:' ''..1:1111:Iiiiii.,.....................**4.,......,...,,11.' .. .•''•• 4.trromarv....,' • ...t.:: k•• "'' . . ittiOy .:• •••••.:•...,...,.,.1.!!!!*.iiiiiii.............':.T.:.:::::=.. ."--....imvpuli;......„.;:;7'41. 71.v. ...;., „. ...''.. i- ...:-;.;17',ri!...rwii...••: . ' .4.j ".: -Ix= '..„47:„... .„.: „ •• :::::.4i::::. ' ;;:'.::; ::: 7"'''''.:::;":"i!! .7: •-•... •JLL - ••• '''' . .• .. ..• •7-•71.11. ..• ::.• .: .L.:L.:••••.V.L. . • ... ., . ....4"•••••4.....,,•44: 111"1"4"111111101111111.1"..?— • IIIIIIIilgillitlMIIIIIIIIr ,,.. . .•- —. ..„. • • . ., .. . .• --•.:- . .. . .. .... • ,...v..: • •. •••• .!!.°.;‘ •:i••:••••• ::••••• L. .••••1,1•••.• ::::::::: • • • .....::::.:.: • • •• • •• •• ••• ...... —4::::::: • - :•. - .k....•:' "'. •- ,;("..- '''' ::.: :.:...: ... . • i . , . „...40. !...:4••!A —••••1.4, . .' ... Vt.. .. ... ... .....''• ..:•01:..:. . ..;*-,',.. `...' , , :'':4.• ,.. .-., 4.,----!4.1.4... -4 •':": ::4.-..., . .. ....... s. . .. . .•.4'I.,' ' , ..- .:.':i",:',,:-""2:,.. :.:•::. •••••-•• • ::::::. • .47,4°.........'.. ,44*'!.":'4,1::...-g:i,%* .4:IS ry24.• • • ,44k. '•:: .•• . . .1,s- . - ' "I4i 1: ••••••:. .....4.-:::::roz...,.:-: ..: '"f-•.• •r • : . . :4 ..4-14.4:::•-:•?*:•...:Pr.C. ?.: . •-•.•...• • •••: -• 'lil...:!1••••" :::•••••, . '' .44•••• ••••:-"'..,•••‘'''•••••,4„.••••:, • •.• , • . ::-,00 .....• ::•••0'.• "? e• . . • •..... .:.,,,,,A. ...:, - ' .....' '4:: •• ,....;:,....,......., .1fr'0141..itiii,'..,.. 4...i p.' 's 1/:....!••• ::.::" ...• •• .. • 4.... •f :,:-••••4 4, t4.•:::::. .-- : .;e, • rev' ::•••• 1 I , i Pe'''.N.i?i.Alt".1. iteL.''• • ...''• '" -..i.popildenkift ..'••''''!... . 1$.•:' III ii....1141.113. • • ' ......''''' ''"... ' :74.- :::11,,. • I?:::.: -.1 4401...40,40 '"--. • .` .• '...,:e0,!rP.-' '.. Art:•;:ii'• .,.„,...•-•...r..; .: -'.;:••• ;.• -, 1::...: ... • $Nr.f.faimer......::4.... ..7 • - .- ..... ..- .. • .. 1 -:r"., •• '•' ; ' ... ......•••• .... .... • • • • ' :::::::...-: •• - .. . ...-: .. • ... ••••• ... k:::.:-:.. _. • .....•-. • ..... :•." • . .... ..... ...- . ..... :• :..••• -""d#417"....7 -% • . .. 14'''''4 tC4 ::.:!::::::....:•:;: • : ::....:...:.•::: .4'''• ......:%.1 . •.•:... ........: •" M. .■,... -,. . . .1'44Z:9164' 44.11 ' - 4 /IX :::• ,, .. ,... * •.• t. 4::..: • — ., 4.•L . `,#,•••Al.. 4•S::••••14 li:: ..4. ,..., .... ft.:. ,,, it '. ■ ' ..• .4%;........• . : ......1...it11:1.:.: ... .1.:7::....7. .••••••mr: ........::. .• ::..:.:...•.... • 1:::•:...:.:•. . . . .1' '9,'-'4..... ...71:.,........ . • :',.... . . 1.1!&:'::' ----- • :.....••••• • : . 1::::::::::•::•• ' ' ::::•,:. ;- •••• . . • ".. ■ .. -..,i.......:....1. .4,..P.,:::4.!. ' ' ••••• :---• .1 . • • A , . ---!.•414::N.••••Fiti% : - • - . .-..::. v ...,,,,••• -.... • _ .:::: ::.::::::•:•.. • • • „i•••4, .. h.11,..-::1:::•; •••...: • :• •••... ......:. : >4., . , i4.••:%:..... . ;..„ • ::::::,. .7.1.;:-'.'''. .A •••‘.•• . 4 • , "-. • _1'7 ....:.:•:"....ik.•:;:•,....$:-. ..... ".. :r, 7.:'-- :9 w •:;:aA:. . .4. i ..., : 41111,` • .....: • ., . . .... :..:.• . .........i. ...4.........• • 1::::•••f•.• • ... . . :........- ;---,,•' .... .• ...lc::: . .. - •k , ...........• ••;... ":•...,... ...•'')V..' . ... ... .• .1.1 I:11.•% ..41. ......::::!.: ::.7.'.•;: ' .:::C''UI.2...!.:;.:;*.....: .. ••• . . ' ,... 4:1•••••:.::. ::•ef..: 4: 4.:::::::::::::•• .• •• . • • ••••.: : '410iiiiii'••••:::::••••••••.::::•:•• •••• . . •• • •• • : •••-•• •• •• ••• ••••••••••• •••.... •• • • . . • •:::•1:',.....:1•••:•,.. '''!”.::::•••• '''.,...-••;•11'.... • • :..."'• ;:::...:.:.• !I • • ..::::: '1.: ....,.....•. ii• :2.11••• .i.,...•:.• ••:. • ... •.........;:'. -.• .: '.. itini: qx liii i • :.::.:,:.:..::. -• •• • • - ..• • •• •• '••:•:::14'••• - •••• . • ..:, • •• elii•IP......- „;:::.:1.••-....,....:••••••...:::•... '•. ..••••••••:....:,,-•:••••4••••::'•• • 1141111%111% .......::. x. • • • .... .:j ...$ '. .. .. • • • I Al . i •'•:.,, .. • •. :;i s • .. Vii. i . x. y it % Y "e EA.G • T 4 • • • • • • • • • • • 4 • • 0 i 1 • • • • • • # 40 • • • • • • • ' • ' . . . : • 1..`: 44 '.1, / R°*4.44-'64 • •••'''''4'1/4404,,,,i f I ... . . . • .....„ ,•• ‘,.....0 / • ,..*. . ... . .. ' • ./ . .NS.St**4.%4%***•,t . . • • • • • . . . • i . . . . .• • . . •• ' • • - i i. . . . . ' • ' . . :• . • : • 1 • ............ ... . . . ..... • . • .• ' • , , :;„.1.' I - • • .2A#'. 1 . • i • •••• . #H: . ' . ... . . •: #. . 7'%....,,,.' ti.• - -- - ...• : , . . ..„,... • , • , ,... -. ... . .1". N• . . Ili .'•'• : •,r' •• '''' '* * r .:. • 44.w.' : . • IN .......",,, 4., l• .•. •:.:.' .•'.".•:: ',4 • ', .. . •:•?: T. . . .. •••••• .. i• .• ..• . 1.1: • • *.i • . . • •••••-* ' • • .. ,. • 30. . . . • . . .•:::. ......... . ..... . • .• . ::: • ••••• ...,.. A . ' # . • ''•... •.:. ####:# • 1 • ..„..... . 4, • .••;. ••.•:: t.i10..h4Fil' 1.. ii• ,•,.i ••• .• iifirl . •.5, i ..f.. . .•• '.' 11.1.1fierf. :,,km ..i.k: • 1..1 ......`' • .. & ... • . • :4,"i• ifi •••••■•,••• • , . . . • 'if % :1 .1, .• . . . .. 0: • : ,:l. N'0. 4 •A ... 0 ::•::•.. :••• -N . •A • • •:::::: # • • :..... . •It% ...... .... .kx,wom . .,,.. 4 • N. .4t . . ... • :: .• itt. . % \v. 1:••:.::::. : •• .• :.':: :!' 00••... •...... 0: .: , . 0: 0 , ,... . . ..,$4 -::: ,:::,`K,' tig:::. ••••^•' ',.('***.: ...! • • • • . ...•••••••,.. '' " • '6,•., .1* wi: . 1.},a• • H• . 4,.......= i .I: . , • ii ...• r A if:: :i • . ..< r...:4„0 . ..i.• ... 3 :::.'".....• c i• ,..- , ; .1. ........, .-,. •11 . ,.,. . ..• : •-w,.; . . ••. ......_.... . 4,4 . ::: ''.-• . :!!1. ..1 F.i A 10 :. . •. •#:&' # •w ; :••. . it& •Mitill P'Aifi''..., • 1 1 *4:**...i.m,„:11., u.r.i ..N.• 4 ...... li, X.*, ... i•1•• .. ..• . ; . .. . • ; .. .:•••,'•*****''' •. *: ..F.i .': ,• •.c. . . , ... '-• .• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • '0 , 00 , 0 , 0 , , . .. • • . .: .... ....r:;x......,; .. t q 3 •.2.• . � ya F aa:.... .nz. . rte«.. f. 22222*2 •22,24 iii: i • . .e • p > , • �.rr' ... vww w.«.e.Mw•v x .. ... { a I .. . . . . . ....„.. . ,...... . . • ,0` :•,,,,, ..• . . */* •:::•• • • • :..:.... . ..• • ••••• • '.:..............' 'Co44.. .ft.:• .••*.....• :::•::: :.•::: 4., • • . . 11 :••:•::•• i 4. .. . ... ... • : • :•.:•:„... ,. • :•:::•. ., I. .... . 1 • . ........ 1:141414.t: ' 1 • . , . • -.1;144' 1 • 44. 1 • • • . -..,. t . ::.1.......4.111. 1 • • • • ' . .0' . • d.../ • .. .• . ... • ... ..., ........ • • 4•. ' .. .......... ...• ' •, :.:..:...:••••••. ..1 ....... . . ....... . .'.....•............. 2, ..8.$ •• . • :•••.•••••.:•••••••:••.•••• , . ... • .. :::•:::::•• ....„, • v: -$2, . .• . ......... .....::::::„.........:• i .:t. c:4 s . ....7...............,-. ..: i . ....... . . • : ..:....,.....:::::: k....--- • k \ -i"-. • ..• - . r :,.. • . . . .., . ::.••••• . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • * ....L r:i.r.7.- l'iti**; I "-....7 ...• •/ . 1 :2,t:',/f.---/—• f' t: --/t.: : TY 2 .: 1 Ev mg ii:u ""tic:: .... .• I xi • . ' :r - ••• 1 :**: ....It IIIIII/III1 1 ••I• : .. P • d 4• [ ..d, • pp r' d.t•. 6 .. i dR,Ed#a: J o li •I • :,f Ott. • x ... s 1 I:g <<aa %.` ; • ,4{ ' tfxf.: 1 it p « •ii:4:: i i °3 I j; • • •..>. `t a w i g • 2 A • rs • • _ F< 8... a ,, ,ice $ >>YY.< te+'a,� a.:y:a.x< • r" ..<. . • w T. • f r3f' P E I' _ . I D u R.AM. 6 . . . • S • • a • • x... x xx-• •• • • • .:: . ............................ ............. ...... .x .xx x_ xxx.. -�,.4. • • • , •..........••••'••• '•'il• •••••• •..1••••••"••••••••7..:•:••••••••••••••,.'••:.•••••••••••••••••••••••••':--.••••:*•-•'•-•••••••••''...'...<....4''...".....'...'.'......:•••••'.1.•••••••,••.......•....-•••••••••••••••••..':.:.• •• rRw {{ x v . : .u.Gb�'x x 'qy b .. �Ix lT..x •iii x . . • • . • i . x • • . •.1 is gg f y .. «. ...... . ...1••••1 ..... J 9 •1 «... -a r 1 r t ». w^°" .rr L„F po i I ( 4 ip ' alit \ -....: . ' x xs�. • . . . • .. ... 4... .. .xxxxxxxx::xx8x.xxxx,' /'• s.. E 6 ... $ • ... - xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx 8 . x. .. ... :. a. • ............:. ''i i x.::x:a .. ... ..A xxx .x:: '. • ... .„ . . ••..„ 'I .... ' ■ '•', '., ..•••:••••.........:......'• .s •1.:.. . ,:',,...P.. ••, ..,..I...ii-, .........4,,, .. . . ...„ ,,,,,.. ...4:: •• x• .... • ...ii.,..,.:: :,.. . ... .. .. .. „," • . . . :... ... ... „ ... • . : •-:. : • . • :::::!..... .......:: ...,•,...0.• „. :.... .:.: e.. N.., .4k,'•• ,0.4.' ,„, ••••■•••• ...„..,• •..e. - ........,1......4:•••• .. :::::,:.:, .......: .....,..:.:,:.::::.: ••,.......,.... .„...;:,..•• .',..,...,.... ,.....,,,..:: :,.....„:„. V (..‹...! ..,•••••.•;,..::::•••• ' ..•':..4.1!'• ...•'.4• • je ..- , . - • ••.•:•.....•:,...:. ....4:4:,.. •.. ••:,...,11.r,.:::„.:1 •• ..:•••• :... ... . . .. .... • . - : •• „: • . ....4 ••,. ••• ..••••.. •:::40 ... 4,.:41,-,.........-• - •„„_. , 4.,... - :,...„ •:: •••.: ::.....,•••.. • ..„:„:„...„.• ., ., . ... •:. J . ••••: . •.., . . Ni.V.: . .. •••,t.t.H ....:....tk ,.'.'W... •,......4„„„ . •,„„, ,. d„ „ ,„ •- .40,.: ......... ...a .. .::::::47....'k• • .............„......x.. :.:...,.. 4.,oit!........ ••• -0 :,....::. . 4, .. . .. ' .,...: .4 .. • .... ,.... . • x , t x ':::•: • . • • • ....- .4' '0... .1.11`F T.',. ...N.:.: .••.•i'.. •• • .. . .... "F •••• >44...: ... `.X... ' .'• ++:N. • ,...,, •.,••••,,`;'," •..•. . • •:.,;....'4'. •... . • ....r ..I.n::'..... ••x .. .. clif.....1'• ..:, .:..,••••• .414 ....:4*.ii...,... :,,,•:44.0 144:.....0.7.,.....,1:.,'',....- '—, ...14:::::-:„..!.'...:.....,.,..,,::.: 41 ' 4,..,.....::),..:::::74.....:•,..':',•••:::::•'. ••.•••,•;:•••:•:,,,•7••••••1••••',...4‘•'•',•'+''',':...*:-....41.4.••'•.....r.••• ••••• 1...4r,:'• •••••,..:.k.ir ,•••• ,• • •:+.1k.,-IF ..:•.:•40:.*it, ' :•14:.II:.: •:445...":1` '.‘".1 . ' . ':::1....!..:111141itrii.11.41111.:4,.... x':',....,:„:•:.... . . .:I.1,..:.:...., , ..,.,:::::%••:::.:::::nti::::::. • . .* ''..'•''..±11.114# -'',...—_• .J.::.., ,.. ....... ••• ,.i.::::••••ti; ..: .....:,::„„..:,Hi:.p144;IN....." ..-4..2:'4.......,.....,,..4F'.. .41....' ...41..•• ..:47.<:.?......4.:1„,',11.::1'...•.......14'.:',:x5*.•••::..).•.:4.......:4: •• 141.''ff: +....::'":•'+' +1:+11.1,iii.1..i.i.,....,,:::::::1,1?...14:•:i.im-• :lir' •'..:, 4.544.1'7•:....., .: . .,....:,,it••'4'4:.I:'''''' •..• '41*?... •.,'1:."4.', *...'•. _• , • ,,•,../.., ,., •4.:•,, • '•• ' . :: i :• 4 , ' -4. • • ... •.,:....: „.....: , ..,. :4...i.:":„,..:;. .....:::JfAP'.• ‘ ::'...".1v.i.e.o....:1 • .. • „ . :44) 4....... • . r . .. .... ,,,,,w......,:cio.,.,........:..:+i 0.s.'....:. ...... .N • • . ' '...'"` .44' ..1"...•• . . ...f.-4..., ... .. . :4. '0. :. .... „.... .:....: .„,.., „ ..... ...„....0.....„0„....,..:0..„...4 ..:. ., .., „K..:. . „.A. j.....--' ....-- ' .. :. .. .. ............ .,. . . Ili...i.1.,.,„....' „: -...!c, ..-6. . , .. . . .. ..• . , .. . . *N.,.4,.. }0... •.• • .0..„........ .....,...'.1, ....... •.. .)1,0,.... •••••• • •• •,..... .... ......---js..... •J••••!:.--... -... •rio....... :1?.. .... ,•-•I:. ..,....ih.... ...- 40r—I ..• ,•a:. •••••••••...4„:‘,.:„ .• .11:174.n.: ... . ........, . „....'.T...'.::....;I: , • • •: . .. .. a • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .... ... ..., ,.. ii....?„{„... ............. :,...H.I.:::::...,.. • • • • • • • • • • • • - ........... .. .... 0 • • • • • • • • • • • - • . . i 6 OPUS• •- Opus Architects& - Engineers,Inc. I I 4.e..... 1 fti...... ....3..ti om I .- ---.-....-....—.-.--.■—--,—..- . I ! - 71 Mars / I . I I , Aro% ier rik . . . • .. . , . i / ,. ,-----• , , I .... ... ..,. ....... BUILDING „ A IC . ag,.... / ....—•--.. fl,..350 .. .-.; .,... „„ ...c. i " 'Z' 1 . 1 „„„ ail; —— ., . . , I ., 4tp_ . , . / , ,1111Plip *a ---,----/". 4\ \ , a a .4,-,.*!.„ , /- 0206 mace Cla 100 r 41,, /‘ ,./ / • ....4.)-. MAO a•10 , IP ,\ ow M‘•••.(If) / \ 01-23-06 IMO \ , .c',/ \ , ' Pew■•• i . / ,' •/\ •' N ....Or AB RuaDIN(. '...,- /AO MU P. / ' ' .., B ■ ED a3 ......e•M•se""":...eorntOm•::::••••.....7! . ,,, c\. ../...,' , ........1.....eon.••••••:•dr •.Nom..e.g.m reverie •■(•\;%........ /,' „,,,, 4 ,•/,'"//' sai. •=r-.2"'—'1,71:1 ...........",...z.r.„..= ; \'s ss ',* -.. 0 40' 80 16 ' 0' \`. ,, .0.......,....." , i \ ,, , 1. ". ‘,/ / \ ,• tS, 0 oll 4•0 II* SCALE:1"=40'-0" \ \\ , , ■L' , ,.././C/..., s.9. . . .... \ '• • '/ r.) •;- '\ f. . .,.- ,,,,,,,;:,' ,, 6,.., gr.::LEE: i C ,.... •3474••• .0 01-Fis 0. Q , ‘s, • ., ,- ,,,, / . ,,, , ,... .444, e MUM •• / \•:‘ • r%) •/7./.,0:1:.0/0.: //,..:krt. C.4,4,cr: 1...3,•04.:i r 5 . MO Mt / • ) 0 , PRELIMINARY a) :.,,,,,,,...,,,,, ,....,„!,,,ea.1,-L,,,,,,,:14-.; , .r. ,0 SITE_PLAN / I e ....•••• . I • - -....... ./.. ' • • . . .... . .. .... • ** ******.... • ***********************.....*.**********.......................::::::::::::::::::::::•:scs•c•N's::::•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••-••••••••••••••••••••••sms,sss.,s,:oss,s,s0•Es••••••sis.::.:.:::::::::::•:::::.:.:::.:.:.:.:.::::***.*.*****.**.*.*•********.**.*******************:******• ***** ...... . . ... . .. *** ... ...... •• • *****„,****.** ..... . .... ......... *. •• ..... ... ..... .... . ••• •• ••••• ••••••• *************.*******.*••••••••••••••••• •• ••••• ••• • •• •••••••••• •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••*****.**.*•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••*.****.*******.*••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••**.*******.***. • ••• . . . . ..... . . . . . ...... . ... . •• . . .. .. . .. .. .. .. •••• . . •• '* :. .. . --• - •• •-• -• .. . ... ..... • •- . • • • ... - •••- - •• ,,,, , ••• '•• ... _..... ..... -, •° • .... ..--- • • .. . . ,,,_ ... -- . .,..-•-•••-• •• • . _. .. .. . . . . ...- -.. , ,.„,,, ....... . . i•--•• *— : .1 .:,•-1.:- .1•.1.: : • .• : t • . . . . • : . _ ..... ,,, ; . . :'7'•• li i ' ::. . ' •.•■ • I i : •.• ' ,:iiiiiiiiiii&••••••°0.°,.. •'''''''''- -°• • • •• '•••••••••°°•' ''"" ...••..>;:!siltifill i'...-. ...... I I : •• ••• , •°.1...•:•,.....•f•:.... ., i -. .: :::::::::::::..qii.illifily..i..T: .... ,i:.,..1.•,,...4.1...,_:.i...........i.j, ..... .... i i i • 1•••7 - -- :: r. . .1::.•--it,,.., ., yr„,1, •Ii.t. ,: * ..• ••.•,••-- ,- . t'T.'-••• l'•••••••1- 'I."-•••'- !.1...-—:. '''l--.7. !II'.. •'..-• irf.- ' --.• 1-1.- - • .:i-:;•,... • •• ' 11-41.°'°!1:- .-.1.— ..- ..• f• • ••,......,..1„...:„..... .. . . r...4„........,....i,,,,,,„.,_.......,.....• ...,;_ .!4. .,:II i li...• •- ,I...!• -,• .1•'• ..•1 4 . • '1'1 • 1 • i .1 i i...i ii 4i .,1.„1 il,.ri , ,,,:i.,.. '•.'°. ' 4.I .,„•;:i, .•:•11; '. ....:1 i ..::4. • 1.4 • ,• •,,J,••••°••°`,,• 1 •• 1••••1 - i - I'l ... ' 11) :I e 1 .t.:-... . : . : r.,:-..4 . :. II 4 • .4•• ii.1 i ' IJ . LI: I.)• . :fo.: ••• ;J....4 • ..; •.... I....4 • 1., • •„....4 • p••• . . :1 f .••••••...... 44: .........1....:: : i'.. I •• ' 4'1 1.1'•••'7............44:••p '•i••••'•'1:74+4,.. 1144••••*.•:4.•'::.•••"••••.....••••,..••••1.'•'....,•.7...:4';•'••••• ... '. *1 .41. :,,, 1. . --*.,, •• .• prilliliiilitipip., , • ' 1 '"":1 '4..'' kixi. ** i**,, ..... i ...........••.•.4..iii"..ta • • ,6, .. 7.61- ^,,,:-.**-- * 6 • . 4, i, ' • '.'.... ' " ...,, * •- I,. • i • ,0 ,, „;1.4.;ii.:',;=`,4* . *..... . xx. . . ....-.. .. .. . , .... ..,„ . . .• .• *. .*-**. - ••I :L:. • 1•I .. ••••••••••• :•:' "':'• .,• ,.'• ....4., . .., ,: .• .,' . . . • • ... .. . „ „,,,,,,,,,, ••-, • • ,. :. : .„.. ..„.., ..:-.., I. , .,.:.* .:::::A,:ii*:: .• ......,4*444: •- • ••• Liv4 . .,S , : : i - ... .1 I .I.•>: : •-• . ...—,• , e...... ...kr . ...•:::::::::::::::::.... ........i.:Alt:ENO.I. . ''..'.. '''''' '' '7.,- .....11 i 14,7,°°n•Itithi.,: L.T.j•J'.1'.1....'7,4.114, - 3 '........•.'...•' •• ' •::::::.k. Pt.° ° ... .. . •.°' .....,:f:*•.!•••, ,,, . , .... ••°-•-• • ..... •• .. -- . . rANNo CREEK COMMONS ••••-••.. RS Vir.W LOrY.frin S01/71 WE$T . to SE 2„) 0 KS ES 0.. •••• • • vid(/ Pre application notes To change from an I-L zone designation to an I-P zone August 11, 2005 STAFF PRESENT: Morgan Tracy APPLICANT: Ed Murphy PROPERTY LOCATION: 15930 SW 74th Avenue and vicinity. TAX MAP/ LOT #'s: 2S113AB 00300, 00400, and 00500, 2S112DC01100, 01200, and 01300 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Zone change for six parcels from the I-L zone to the I-P zone. COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial ZONING: I-L NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING A neighborhood meeting is required for a zone change. Meetings are valid for application purposes for 6 months. NARRATIVE Include a narrative that responds to the applicable criteria. The zone change must address the following standards of 18.380.030: Zoning Map and Text Amendments 18.380. 030 Standards for making quasi-judicial decisions . A recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application for a quasi-judicial amendment shall be based on all of the following standards : 1 Demonstration of compliance with all applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designations; This means you will need to look through the Comprehensive Plan, available at the public library or online, and see if any of the policies are applicable. Most likely, many of them will not be directly applicable, but to cover your bases, you should have a response to each. Pay special attention to the Economy, and the Locational Criteria sections, although a preliminary review did not raise any glaring issues. 2 . Demonstration of compliance with all applicable standards of any provision of this code or other applicable implementing ordinance; and • • This response should include a review of Metro Title 4, Regionally Significant Industrial Lands, provisions. 3 . Evidence of change in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to the property which is the subject of the development application. This is often the most difficult and sometimes the most subjective criteria of all. It is the applicant's job to either demonstrate a mistake has been made in the adoption of the zoning designation or that a mapping error has occurred OR convince Planning Commission that the circumstances of the neighborhood have changed since the adoption of that zoning district to merit a revision to the zoning classifications. IMPACT STUDY 18.390 Include an impact study. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirements, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. In most applications, this is not very critical. However, in this zone change, you will need to scope out the potential impact from increased developability of the site. You are going to be presenting a site concept to the planning commission who may even apply a PD overlay to ensure that detailed development will be consistent with the concept plan. This provides some assurance to the decision maker that the zone change will result in an improvement to the area, and settle fears that the revised zoning designation may be exploited. It is extremely important that the impact study takes a detailed look at the potential impacts on these public systems. REVIEW CRITERIA (note that this list is intended to provide guidance in preparation of your application, and that additional criteria may be identified dependant upon the nature of the specific application, or as other issues are raised. In other words, this is not an exhaustive list of all criteria. It is the applicant's responsibility to • ensure that all applicable standards are met.) 18.380.030 18.390.050.B.2.e (Type III process) Based on the information provided, it appears that the text amendment request will be a Type III-PC Process, with a public hearing before the planning commission. Appeals are held by the City Council. Application fees: Zone Change: $3,040 Decision timeline is generally about 3 months from receipt of a complete application. PREPARED BY: Morgan racy Associate Planner • • • • PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES till� ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q C entyD Oregon t Shaping f Better Community PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Maplsl: 2S113AB Tax Lotlsl: 300,400,500,1100,1200,1300 Use Type: Industrial The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ® SW Upper Boones Ferry Road to 52 feet from centerline (5-lane Arterial) El SW to feet ❑ SW to feet El SW to feet Street improvements: ® Half street improvements will be necessary along SW Upper Boones Ferry Road, to include: ® 36 feet of pavement from centerline ® concrete curb ® storm sewers and other underground utilities ® 10-foot concrete sidewalk with 5-foot planter strip ® street trees sized and spaced per TDC • street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. El Other: CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Aiwlicatlon Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department Section . . - r • • ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: El feet of pavement El concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. El Other: El street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: El feet of pavement El concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees El street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. El Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement El concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering DoDarlmentSection • . • • • El Other: • • Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: (1.) (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: ® Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW Upper Boones Ferry Road. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located in Upper Boones Ferry Road. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to connect to the public sewer. Water Supply: The City of Tigard (Phone:(503) 639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 612-7010] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. • Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm CITY OF TIRARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section • . drainage plan for the site, ar&nay be required to prepare a sub in drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system wilommodate runoff from upstream perties when fully developed. Detention is required when net, new impervious surface area exceeds 5000 square feet. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on- site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ® Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ❑ Payment of the fee in-lieu. Water quality treatment is required for all impervious surface area runoff, existing and proposed, per CWS, March 2005. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. 1) 18.705.030.H.1: Must provide preliminary sight distance certification for all driveway locations, existing and proposed, with a list of improvements required to achieve adequate sight distance. This must be submitted with the Land Use application. 2) 18.705.030.H.3: The proposed north driveway must align with 72nd Avenue. The proposed south driveway does not meet the 600 feet spacing standard. 3)Access to 74th Avenue must be approved by the Railroad. 4) Meandering sidewalk does not meet the standards. An adjustment is required. 5) Stormwater detention and water quality calculations must be submitted with Land Use application. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section . • circumstances, payment of tf IF may be allowed to be deferred dr the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payfflight until occupancy is permissible MN when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. Pay the TIF. PERMITS Public Facility Improvement (PFI) Permit: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. NOTE: Engineering Staff time will also be tracked for any final design-related assistance provided to a Permittee or their engineer prior to submittal of a PFI permit application. This time will be considered part of the administration of the eventual PFI permit. The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows: NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section Master Permit (MST). As permit is issued for all single and/lift-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for bng construction, including sub-tra (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT STAFF DATE Phone: (503)639-4111 Fax: [503)624-0152 document3 Revised: September 2,2003 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section • • • PRE-APPLICATION " " '`, CONFERENCE REQUEST CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Applicant: Ed Murphy, LDC Design Group Address: 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Case No.: Iii CZ00S 000 City: Hillsboro, Oregon Zip: 97124 Receipt No.: 206c-.it 351-3 Application Accepted By: -1Is7 Contact Person: Ed Murphy Phone: 503-858-4242 Date: —I/SUDS-- Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): Rich Akerman, et. al. DATE OF PRE-APP.: 5/9/05 Address: 919 West Point Road Phone: 503-784-8981 TIME OF PRE-APP.: 4%DO City: Lake Oswego, Oregon Zip: 97034 PRE-APP. HELD WITH: Property Address/Location(s): 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rev.7/1/05 is\curpin\masters\revised\Pre-AppRequest.doc Road, 15930 SW 74th Avenue, and other properties with no address. Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): 2S113AB00300, 2S113AB00400, REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS 2S113AB00500, 2S1 I2DC01100, 2S112DC01200, 2S112DC01300, (Note: applications will not be accepted without the required submittal elements) Zoning: Light Industrial (I-L) Site Size: 3 acres ❑ Pre-Application Conf. Request Form 4 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION ❑ Brief Description of the Proposal and All of the information identified on this form are required to be any site-specific questions/issues that submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a you would like to have staff research minimum of one (1) week prior to officially scheduling a prior to the meeting. pre-application conference date/time to allow staff ample time to ❑ Site Plan. The site plan must show the prepare for the meeting. proposed lots and/or building layouts drawn to scale. Also, show the location A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 of the subject property in relation to the weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either nearest streets; and the locations of Tuesday or Thursday mornings. Pre-application conferences are driveways on the subject property and one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of across the street. 9:00-11:00 AM. ❑ The Proposed Uses. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN ❑ Topographic Information. Include PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM Contour Lines if Possible. 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. ❑ If the Pre-Application Conference is for a MONOPOLE project, the applicant IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE must attach a copy of the letter and PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE proof in the form of an affidavit of INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM mailing, that the collocation protocol was ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE completed (see Section 18.798.080 of GROUP. the Tigard Community Development Code). ❑ Filing Fee $351.00 CITY OF TIGARD 7/28/2005 . 13 125 SW Hall Blvd. 3:50:43PM ,k Tigard,Oregon 97223 • �I1. (503) 63 9-4 171 Receipt #: 27200500000000003573 Date: 07/28/2005 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid PRE2005-00066 [LANDUS]PreApp Conf 100-0000-438000 306.00 PRE2005-00066 [LRPF]LR Planning Surcharge 100-0000-438050 45.00 Line Item Total: $351.00 Payments: Method Payer User ID Acct./Check No.Approval No. How Received Amount Paid S Check RICHARD ACKERMAN MET 2926 In Person 351.00 Payment Total: $351.00 • cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 I • , Jopatl an Gray Vice President - O C 503.352.1 181 C 503.705.8367 � E grayj @studioparati.com 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive ,., Hillsboro,OR 97124 P 503.858.4242 ,, P A R A T I F 503.645.5500 A R C H I T E C T S E hillsboro @studioparati.com www.studioparati.com 1 BRIAN BENNETT Senior Real Estate Manager - CC OPUS NORTHWEST,L.L.C. OPUS. 1500 SW First Avenue,Suite 1100 www.opuscorp.com Portland,OR 97201 503-916-8963 Main 503-916-8964 Fax brian.bennett@opusnw.com / Brian J. Dunn, P.E. Senior Engineer bdunn@kittelson.com KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 610 SW Alder,Suite 700 Direct Fax:(503)535-7562 Portland,OR 97205 Fax:(503)273-8169 , Telephone:(503)228-5230 http://www.kittelson.com • 1 C_'. '-20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive Ed1 Mu phh Hillsboro,OR97124 P 503.858.4242 l F 503.645.5500 E hillsboro@ldcdesign.com cc. Richard Akerman www.ldcdesign.com Kevin VanderBrink, Macadam Forbes Hillsboro,OR Tillamook,OR Vancouver,WA Bellevue,WA Coeur d'Alene,ID Rocklin,CA Clermont,FL 1 1 . p, q 0 ys !°=° ri• a /....o a 1y t y ;'I-'" � :tie 17�'`.,", -,;�g;:': a o../. C a -Y. *tip;;,,: � -�� • 1� ttm�R\\Vl,• p "' • >• ./.,.',.. : I I I' f l "s it? I (CR 1042) I it f I I I I ::)� ;, ,,,,:::::::....:::,:...,:::::.:,,,,I....;‘,.:„. a ;.:;I I �` t..., I F-- SU/ 2 I I AVENUE ! 43 11 '"' r"`",,,,+ .4,,,,,,R %wKn..aYN. we. MAN '.\.c•.\.......,.\'.:�n„\cr\�'rroR�\,\�.�,w:.•.R .a- ;,• N iI Oa ia t- NP . as— 5 ,I _ I O C: mn__ _ _ms L v �l '37 0 ✓ e a '� 1 / \ � I I .0 ✓ .✓ / x If'$6 E NB v '� I T—o' r : it bl "g 1 g g ✓ I g� 7 ”' 'a' I d I I I g $ 2 .ate°, 7% I� t�8 N t II I R -,, II . r dig 1 j 'g�a �� j . , I I I I I € I 1.11 ppI''' '' — - r', . I ''' I j. y`;'�tr•\RaR\RR\,,tm_,\,\\\\\o\.Re\\a\\vwxro„,,„,,,,!R!a\\\.'. : ao\\\\•.\\\\\\\R\\\.\\\R ''99 SW lYNNi••a\,`.. \;,\\\`•.\\o,.,,q,\,•,'o.Rea,,,,u.,,\.,..`•.\,,.,a`.�„'•,.,,,\•,� s 72ND fl (CR 126) .� AVENUE KA �9 ; '`��•"' •"�'.�N • '•g" `”, , =fir�•- `-i ✓�^' . o 1 4.1 a 2L 0 ::' 8 :'.'g'.•>.;:n?:;;';',13'.:-.:',., :e..-... deli Vddi 7<a 4fi�`N '1 Z ] ` 4 Tr'y 1 4 G1 i:'.. �an D ,:,. .,..::-.......7::-.-".:..J,�pqq, 4' g m o ::s:;: O m �I i s �,x �m 0 ... 2 1 2'rn> - 1 PA I4 ;`- i PL.:;' t �g0 y2i' N I 59 �0� y ' �,.•— ; m -E.�1%.11,„,, 9 0(5 o :;g ,13 Y O O - o ._ . / f�I ( o i($..' K 'AI ::,.,, '.B "ki'..{'. .,. .tti:,.. 7".,7).`t f,'` ,siimo�. I xs:,m as_ W aN I - 1 �.ii ) /j'/' i ,.Aa, �R•-. I x==3 M1.: .. rJ $F t>K... ,.J r- y 7: f..• it ti. k. ftt . ., . V.,;17 ---"t __ wW _ash.,' mM. f r ��J ��J s :::'-•.::; -' ,: - ... ^ ;mq 800 ; ��/':: ' % /= ¢oo ✓_ :, z 5.52 K f�_ 4,, I. .S.K `\-'':o/ ;' -''i,:'•. ',;' .:.,`:: WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON /r,/ r 1, j\\ 3e ',j�•; NW1f4NE1/4 SECTION 13T2SR1WW.M. '' %' id +• // e`\ .<- SCALE 1' 100 \ x r, r 5��p� • ''� � i� K 7�� i.i.. '81! IS 11•,: III \ \ /'.�• `\ riff AxK \\ _ { -,.. :: 'e .< ,\lb. j.: /4• h � / t'Z'4' /,•,,,. \01,,,,. 600 v k3�\f \y .. : r �.1 / 10• ;,; ;. �.\ \ \ ,� ,o, .prkLiS�■ y \4. \ l` �� _ /i- . \ 1/,%���.c@� ,�g'�® '1f�.�;(��11�i�y1•Y' ;'; -.: i:, .T� j \ati'1 %' \ I\ -\\ . .-•••, -0 =i`,,7ru` R190i C��11►�11AM li ■•.'"'r"'. • z.' - ../�:/// , Q'�/- �- il■ ----V-- . — ii FOR ADDMONAL NAPS WSR'OURW.EBSRE AT ;,. .. " / -Q`�J \ / w■reo.washlnplon.orus /- / s' Q>' \ +,,� ,�,�"' ,y, •, a "- niau-..:; ,^:i ..,',1:1;:.„5, ••� (7' ;'1'' *'..+`� dab — \ .,. ,. - -x ,, 2 74 5 :: ., "`N+I \ ”'*'o. �i Q`/ I rc5:1.x5m ., •7 •:'...<44.,'..� '�,° *'. ,�ti� / \ I Via: :cs:'.` 'rie:. / \'4. '- ! 800 0i ii'..‘..`''.`.'..`:'...' .4,'•a,),,..':*:',:`,, 2::::::6:.„._..• •' .'•. i',1/ ' 1500 a-.r n \ ' ,'' . '.. '. , 2W K .'f Q - 1.' ;— •_T,._ .,: Cancelled Tatdoto For.2S118AB " , 23-87 RI .---7- , y� ,300.,xW.,,00 ie5 A,AW 1201 OM R I �` I •- 100 22.27,0 I q\ Q \ k j" : j { a :iiii A C AROGRAP HY G • / I ' ' \ l 3 .,,.•.:,, PLOT DATE:May 20,2004 I I FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES I I L''''.' `l".'`` ONLY-DO NOT RELY ON ; :::; K.;`f.'•'''',''(.4 / 1 cl FOR OTHER USE s j ! I 1 , 5 5wn■s«aaa.r«nM elm,9.Y.MatO.r.°c«a,uu,.. ,4:,::• ,. ,', ,::,'_:: ' I I :� an.aar■wySU.nEmba lYS.«m,■Af,..alpoprhb nYy 1 a.,n. arrant la! j.. '•:l' .:,`•. ,.] av-u x•• ywa-,-r.1,�,.+.�-3..�._a•..--�, .r..,+. ..a...i.-w`:+�-.w, ..r..,..,.rf . � .. � �.•�:'•..:':-�'';• � :�.- ,ss : > • # DURHAM TIGARD 2S 1 13AB 2S 1 13AB ,..., _ :* ...., ... ft, 7 .f: . NO :,00#1.=•..,.%off:0 piperk* • „,, , 4 ',..• ..•.... ., •...41:: iii:•:::::::::: ....... •'-'7.. --#. l'•.....••••...- '... •.',4 01'.:,• ........."...•• .0 • ..* 'I '''''.••••%1"••••-'• •' .••••''"'''"'•H"'•'"':•:'•••••••''.• •••••••-•••'•.'..•'•'•••••••••••••'•'••••••**'•*•••••,11=1.,Leill.a_,,!1:1:::.:::::::::•:•::•:::•?••:',.i..lillififiliiiii11.4.11:•,1:11:111,7•!:.....:!!!:+111c,cliiiiii:4:111viiiiii 3 3::::. ::::.':::::f :. .... .......t • " N:9:::::.0 .• .:1,::• 1........: .,.. 99i1:15,...„:"•::::,.,,,,ammg• ••• , - 9.:•:::: $.4, 4,400.443At•:••••• .j.:••:::,•.:•••••••••••,::.:...r: • 111:1:14::: IR*. ..:::: , ' . ....., ..... ........:: ,,,,...i....::.n....:4 . '..• ' • • ••••••••• •i :::,1". . ...... •::....... _..... e.....::: •••::::A• ::.::::. : .......• „................ •••::::::.•::::::•:•. .:: • ,....!...... •-F--:-.......,..• :::-.....•:. .,.....33.31:. : •::,411 , z 1:•:••!'•,... • • .•. - . . . . ..... ••!..••••: •••••:•:•••••*•**...., • .. . ••.•.........::::1;..r.:::::.:.:.....:••sa,,,I,,::.,-... .,:. •;,.. :'•:-,:, ,..ii: ii:....0:::.•9;r• .1111haVhiledWil.........-tf=,,,,=7:.=-......:„... ii =i, .. .;,a.•••'• tIarillit V -11!•:"9110.Nitr"...7'.41:1.;-:-.. .. .'*41...v•TVE144:111. 7107. :Pt :.:;.:01:1••••.-f••.::::a,.. f....:.t.. „ • .....fffifttfill ''''' --Cfli4.04111,1014%041.4111:44NVOIStiVik .-...-• 'fr , • . • Mk likiiiif4.ki.g.illiitle.'tiii; :::'••••;:".......: • :.::::!,::"Iir .t .•:':...t.. ikit':••:•:' ;" ."A = .. ,,,,,,,,vet,.....4.iffirt.tiril ••:4:111:•iff••=4,,ffr ••:.:.: f.".........=• ., 4..::. ....:::,;,........ : :. r :-":: - ;. .. - ,7".••••••••••••.ti ......-•• . . • . .. .....,. •Virk-• •:•mliiii. * •,.• •• ••::•• -•" aluio: .:....• • " • g.J'.. .... ........ •• •• - 11"• .• ,."1 "...•• ......s.. .....!'•••'1. ,•.. ;•'.• 't.• • .:'. :•::..4:...,It .....:: --. . •-•11.1:.A... :4461740r ....,.. ..„,..„.•.. . ,...,.::,...,.. •:.•:::..„ . ••• • ...• .. ..., • ••• ., ..... • •••• ,....:„." .. .:::::.::::.• ...:....,... ....... . ....................... ••• ,....... •• ., • • ,.. . . • ... !„.:::,..,.................,.. ,,. ...IF,7.14:: :„....i., . ,,,.... • lik ..,. - II .• . •'.. Af...::::4:1?m ...... •P:' „.„. •. • .. . ...i : +++::;411 . .' . .1%' r:r:'. :.. 7Krt4a1:41.i.:4:::"41.':::'''' 1.„, .. • 4' " . , • ....,. . ..'',• • ..:01:1,1: .%•••N. .........,..::..::.• •• ... .... .: • - . . .•,.. • . .. ...- . . . • . . • .. ... . ...... .....,.... .•:"J.:.:::.:•.:.,,.....: ...: •-••••: . '.. - • 110.- ..: . ,•-••.:'... ............ . .. ,.. • • • • :::: 44.11117;rt•• • • .. . 1..f: • • .: ,-. i , • . : ..4 ... • - '•::: - . -.• .. ,..- ••• •.. --I : ,,! .11. ........ • •rit-- ,.., 4 • .. . . . . .. . .,.. •r::....4.'•••••1.14,..1.F . .4.'“4'•' .''. • .•.....1.::::.•%..:::::■:".::..:•.. , . ....-. •::::: 0 A••': ..4? '''1 •''',.11;:: ...• • • • ,..."-..., ... .-... :.• I 1 '. ....'* -.. ' •..• . •'. ,,,,.„........i...i.,....,:f.„..•:,:t.T :""".•••••.;.;,1,ih(„iffliiAk.,:iii0140:01140"11%.4'4. ••••%."'....P14,4iidi..74A ,..... '.... jiel..: ......, '‘,4'• •.-111,144•,.....,.. . • . r ; ' • •• • • ....". .:" .. 11% - • .• ......... .....• ••-••••••• ••••••'•••r .•":•1•.4■■ f!:!......., •• • " ..,:.,";w:.....: 1:4. •.. a. .,.. ..."..: 4... .. ''''''...... "Villiiit1.2..: . ewer,' "- ....k....... •"i ...:.... ti',..b. ,.....:::;.: -.".::•::::::'''' " 111,m .4...-"i'."'•"•-. .." ,,• . •••••••• ...." ..,•••••,••• • - ,,,w, . „,......„..i. •„:„..• .........,,4 „1•,,,1„..i.... • . •• . \‘‘..,,,,-111\:••••••••''•° ... _. -I••••,..•....i../..-tik:„•'+' ...... ,, •••••:•-••...•::.....4:::.••,::.• • .., • .. ..„., :„.•• •••••••i 1 •••• • ..::•::::::••••••,.:2•::,:::,: •••,.......... .......:::::. ••• ...s.,•••.• .1:::::Jr. '‘.7•. ..4.,• $4 4"" idh":".. -71:::ie- .: • •. • I ••••:: :•• •;-,'i' '•,.••;=.• •'..•• • ....k'•••1•44"• . • •• •.:::' • .'• • •• ..'!iir. . ... .:• •: •-:"::. .., . ..% •.... • . ••-*1-••••••• .• •;:10://;"..•• ..1..ii'Llii:15-!"••"•• ..•4 ../... ...) -.... ,,"/..• • • •:•:•.....111•:. ;'.:41 ..:::1,•'•fl...::.•••iir: 4. ''.. ‘ •••••- ' 11;'''!'+' ., , •• O'r,..''' :.:.''.•...'... ...41:11,.; ... '+''''t 1.;,-;:.:..:'''••:74::::::::!':::•?..::::01:::•.a.,14."•.,.:::::j•:;!1.I:•"'..'''''' •7.::: ....i......:..:.::: .•:,. leg:,.. .... ,............... .......• ....$::::!::.....•:::::::::::.;;:..:...:...0..:.!...:r''...:.........;, :::,:V.:. 1:: t,..:... ........:2:..:.::!..:oii•i3Ok:F.:::....! .:!..d. ••:':.."":"::.'if:ON:1/4..:ir. • ...•: ,u,ta::•• :••• :7 :.......r.11:1,:::.....:F.:..:.....:....!.::::!il•::::::,::•:. :•:.::::...:...1E::.'.10:!.::k•t:i::Jiii• ....:'. ,• a.- rw"5:1 !e•••:,F:v4...i.:•:.. :r• Iftii-:::1:. 7t•:iiarIfOir• .!L0 -'41:111.::olif.,•::• -• • :.::: .,...9-.7::i-....::::;... :.:. , :ir..11,. :A* :. •• 1:':,;•::••••: :-.7':::•::::::... ::::..:,:r .:.::::..:::•;:.::' :.::::::::::S:-1::::•:,•,:• •::::,:•:.:::,...:.1•:::::::::.11:!•;:::,:::::::•:.::•:••••:.:: ::.•off:.'„.•abilli :•!•••::' ' ,...::: •:::::..7...::::.:F;•::: •:. •::::---- .:II:# ::., .- .• •• • ::••:::::••: - ,.......::::.::, ••,,::::::::: ..:::... .:•• '•".': '• 1:.:1... .... • .- ,...... ./.. : . •...'90.;::,.:.:!:0.:;::5!:r.:.:41:0. ..,..•!:-7.--4%..,:•-•.;,':.::. :24.•01:::••..ii:f.1:!11::::::::::2:::::::;:::::.::..::: 7..., ' ::."1...:•*::,4'-;......:,,::::.....-.;;'.'":.%:::::...:'''44.::'• ,':'••• ....'' ..:::::11%I: .".:11.i.:::;:l: •''''' '::igirlr:":..AI'.i.:'•:".:■•••• ':• .' .•:::;•:...",..:•:••:.:'''''''f:.!. . .f.:•:;i .::.:.;.1::::,.■;,:r1•. : : :.• ft....., f..g. •Y, .7f. -• -:".".. • •• •''' ===• - fil -1.' '•• •.:-... '-'f,':• •f:L:.:..1::',.:, ...., :.2.i •:.': ..14:1:11...::... '• •'• • '. 7 --: ':''''''"•••;111:•:"'"1 :7""•;;:!!':: .. .;2::::. '+' • N.". "!.:;t4 -'••..;.• "..- - .. ,-- ....: ' 11::: *.lir:-"•••- ..:!1"...:: •'' .....? .:17::•'::::•:::::::::!'...''''.71kH':‘•31;:::...•1::•...:".'-',.:iiti!4:•`:••....;::F••.c.;:::::::::•:.:!..1 .4, .::.'•• • %qk •••••• i ....- • • ..''''....4?:":'...•:1"......1r.::`,1:211::::::•:::.•:•.' .. .•••': :1'..•. • . ,.7.; ....., „::::: .::•••111„ . .;',Crli liii•.. . .'••■•:`.;......' :"':',71::::1,;:InE:;,.. ::%I.'. ..:::..;-•••:...1.:2:]••i ,-;i:::::-.:.. •.. 4. 39..•,..:.;:v•„:#• rho: ... ,_ . :. .:•:09:.. :.1-'1.9.,::•1-:. •• .....::•'•:q. ... '.., 1.::::•.!::::::1;a: ..ii;,. •'s. • ::: ...::L.:. .:iiii -.9:, . •77'. •..: :. :. • -. ...... •'::: r''.... i• :.• .• Pp.; •":"."..• ,:: • •• ..:'• .;' ....11:"4:" ..zY,.•4:.:+:• •:•.. ::.. .dni .• • • :..1 ''+: 4.....ic ...1..........:.:::•::...••:•:'":•:::!••::::!'.;.,...•.:4::.t.E1,..',....::•••••:-.. - ......- . *::. ..7.:;,..'''' e . ....•''''.::..:::::...1:-....0;.::::::`.:•.f::.:•:i0.4111:12('F::;:::11'.; „.... '', 11' .4'••.:• :.•:lig... -:il'•;i6r:. 1 4"' •."'.4.:!tql.:•:;6':11,..::::::'. •.'"..:...."'?"""-:"!::::Flii:r. .',I'' :PI - ,, ,,, , . ,f''.:+',?'' . .:, •.., %::::.11.....: ... 'IP 1:.:SI•:'.::!'":;:::: ...., ;*". .". .• .:hiAIN•:•...:'• . , •:::::H:i'!.:4°'.."":::::: . i •glivi•:...r::::::.:.:A. .. , :.'"'.....,..". :.:.".. ' • ..•.i.N.:""er.:....:. .:...„. ,'.. ,, ','",„ ..;,,j,■-••:••• 461:9114...,..:::::...1::..i...:.: • --- ..::: '.::::::1..... . ':`, ..... '•''' . . • • . ..: ... .,,,... -. . " a ''.11k.lii r..;'..::;:. . :i:.::.Iiiif' •" • VT''•••...: - •••• ' ".'-"T.:. ‘1:".7:.il .;.:...••::'...4,::. . ...":...:. ...:1%.•‘':k:::..z.:.::::: ..... .-2;* '' ' • ..:-•-. ..:. ..... re.....,:;,......:. :.....:.. ......:if:::. ..:!.......::::......:::.......,:.::,....:...,... :.3..::::.::;. './. Arii•li'''"': •4-...:':::I ..:.' 4.1.-7.....•:•::4,..h.e-:1, 1!:4 1• . ./....'...114141".•• .... . •.'4...... . -• : .. •Irr:riAr.;..:::::...;!!.k:.0 La.....::. •- ,'.",... .1.tap. SI• •,, ,,.....„,.'IhT•,.,„ ill, •;;•..'llilii.:: .:E.. 4 •.: •: . •::••i- ..:i4.;'!!!:. *OgISIg.:::. 11::::$1if:;.;;;;:bki4 1.::w1:01 -' -••••••' '..: .4 'A.!,,I.::.-:'.. : • . • ''''... .'... ....,...:'..";- :.;.;"•''::.,iii:!: '''Ir".44 '114'110110.F. . .;''.. .. :',;: ...:•pg.iglir""'''':;::':::;:EFI::::i:::.:1111.4 ': •' ' • AO" . ..i!liFF:1::::•!::!;;;;;;:•:..„..:a.::::1.:;:i.:::::•1.:::•::::::!",;11.11.mioth ........''• ...:::;!"i:;:'1.1111::.:::..:;.." ':::.::•:111:..•.......:.:.;0:::6:..1.:...Rj : „I'S " -„ 7 i: • :f.,......tff';. . .. ....i. ,:,::•Ni!!!.9r:K 9111k 9,:kii: ..•.....,:•••I. .. ... ...italtilit '11" '''', -• •-_, 9'.dhri:•;:':.• ,".::i• :.:. 2..::::::::1:.' .:::::• ..:::•.::Ii::ii':.••••••.4,:o.::EguriEN -••• -••• : •••:,::.:::,::•it :::- 1„sa.:::•:::.::,i.....•-• .„.... :.•.••••••. :::::•:::::,1Y:::::At '''.. & • :• •, ' 'Oh •k•::::;;N:. :::::.. .. ::::,:::•• 114" .::•11.14:::::::::: . ,--- ..... .. .. ... .. ... . ......... --- .. •- •• - • • -•••••• ..f. _... .. :k:.::::::::rili . 419!..1"• . ........41...11.. 7.,.1::..:.r•:•.1%:;::i.i.::7:10,:h...2;';::. • ::■iiiite.hi . .....:],::. :.- :''. .. .:.,:.i.i0.:.ivi. ••• ..a::....0,.• . :E.; .,... 1111.' .... •,fr:i..44.::.:;••::::!-.•It. e....h: .31!:.01:. .... ....... .., ..... • -'iiii.:::.:•.. • •".:41'i4.k"••: *'1:• ••'' •iii:I.A1,...'.4iiiii,:. ..:32:::x. •.• :.:::. •• - .••. - ...••• eir . .,......t4e1....•:::. .:- •• .•r...,ar-.:.:.:•st• .. ,r•gr.:.,„,,,,.....: •.:.: ..... •...: , - ...• .:::f•:7•::t.:•: b.'.■V ......:1 4,:107..' :1„:11•:•:::111:::!!!:::::::::i.:!iiii;in.V" .•,... .-.:.': :•.; ..! ...::4. ,.:..:, 9461....,...)..''..... ;P.. ' ::'.:: .5...":....;;;;,::...:::: :d,:.....06.clip.' .,:••••' ..... .....e•••-.,• A• :kJ:.•••••..:. .::.•:•.- •:::: ...:-..:::::§nt,:::44:ar •:•‘..:...• .... - ......„, .4 h... .1 :,., '.■::■..1...,„. „...;'....., ?.1!':/ ... :::".*. " ":1....::•;:;::1'...:':.:!.:.;:'....:11::•;I:' ri:E... ....1:::.'9g.'951. ..f. c.......- • . .4,...1...i.. . .: ' . .. " :. .p..'.• . :,•:••••.....,......„,.. i.:ii••••'••■ ..... • !:.. . .t1 .71.:..i. ::i .:•.:.::......... ".•101f•ii!'',..':'''"..!!':': ..„*„. . - ...,'..'.4:44141.•„a ,,.,,•'!"... . . . : ...:;.!:1::::#;; ;:;:::::•:.::::::.......j;,..;,.:::::::...,::1::••••:.: ii.:::.,•••::.:•••:::'..:••••••!tr.,.,.74 1+..,.......fii:i...k.i....!:::::!?!.........11.17 :47...1. ..,,I? •,,.... •••••, .:..;;;.0 I.4,....:.:...:..... .... 1 . :■!.:.•1.:.:. .:.:!:'... ••.:.7:::::.i.:.:.?.:1;::;;;i:itil!.11.:rj.:!. „, . ..... '..., ,,,w--1::: .-7:..ew -.1::::::::......-:::.•":. ' 1.t.." ::•i,.,ii. • ....1::: • '.....::: :.::,:-. :.:,::......- - ... :::::!.::.:.:,...:4.:::::::i...:::::..1::::::;,::.:.!......Tr:.4.!........ . .: ..... ,-.1 --, . . . , ' / I I I I / / l I / / I 1 n I / / / / / / / 8 • / / / - l /4 •Ir. 11 -'- -- --._- _.► • - '-'6 - - - - ----' -'- ---y 9 \'\ / /3. / •13 9 / \ // / • BLDG.A ' •^ \ • (3)STORY OFFICE \ / / / 16,960 SF/FLOOK, 9 '\ / / / 9 • 59,880 SF TOTAL+/\ / / / 1I•. / \ \ \ / . / / • . 9 1 I2 / / / 28 6 • /\ \ / / / N. // , / / / '\. N /(// / / l '/ s b �01d` \ // / / / / yi / / // / / \ \ I . L: : E•• \ \ 9\\ ,\/. \ .\MISC. TIGARD SITE \\ \ \\ \TIGARD,OREGON \ \\ \4/10/01 Q \ \ 9 \ 6 SITE SUMMARY \\ \.\ \\SITE AREA 240, 406 SF 5. 519 ACRES \ \ 9\ /- / / BLDG. AREA 101,760 SF 42.33% COVERAGE \ \ \ PARKING 408 SP 4. 01/1,000 SF \ \ / / ' \ / /. / / / / /- / . • • neighborhood meeting record Exhibit I, • • • • LDC NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING G NOTI E C • Land use application for properties at 16075 SW Upper Design Group a Ya+at/<omcan • Boones Ferry Rd. and 15930 SW 74th Avenue • • • The owners of the properties at 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and 15930 SW 74th Avenue (and other properties without a site address) intend to • apply for a zoning map amendment for this property from Light Industrial (L- • I) to Industrial Park (I-P). Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for this amendment, the owners would like to discuss the proposal with the • surrounding property owners and residents, and any other interested citizens. • You are invited to attend an informational meeting on: • • Wednesday, September 7, 2005 at 7 :00 P. M. • Red Rock Creek Conference Room • Tigard City Hall • 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97224 • Explanation I • • The properties are identified as Tax Lots 2S113AB00500, 2S113AB00400, 2S113AB00300, 2S112DC01100, 2S112DC01200, and 2S112DC001300, • which are shown on the attached location map. The owners intend to apply • for a zoning map amendment from Light Industrial to Industrial Park on this approximately 3.0-acre site. The reason for the proposed zoning map • amendment is that the I-P zone permits a broader range of land uses than • the L-I zone. The I-P zone allows light industrial, professional offices, indoor recreation, and commercial lodging outright. It also allows (with limitations) • retail sales and eating and drinking establishments. • Before submitting the Zoning Map Amendment application to the City of • Tigard, the applicants are required by the City to hold a neighborhood • meeting in order to explain the proposal to interested citizens and solicit their comments. (Please note that this will be an informational meeting on • preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the • application to the City.) If you have any questions, please come to the informational meeting, or contact me at the phone number, mailing address, 20085 NW TANASBOURNE DR • e-mail address, or fax number listed below. HILLSBORO OR 97124 • PH 503. 858. 4242 FX 503. 645. 5500 • CONTACT: Ed Murphy, Comprehensive Planning Manager WWW.LDCDESIGN.COM • LDC Design Group CORPORATE OFFICE ADDRESS: 20085 NW Tanasbourne Drive P HILLSBORO, OREGON • Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 TILLAMOOK, OREGON • PHONE NUMBER: 503.858.4242 , VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON FAX NUMBER: 503.645.5500 ? BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON • E-MAIL: murphye(aldcdesign.com f COEUR D'ALENE, IDAHO • ROCKLIN, CALIFORNIA • CLERMONT, FLORIDA f • EIHMEMIMI- CITY of TIGARD ■■ Mo C OEOORAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM I! �_ KABLE LN AREA NOrlFim , . ilt (50 o i �. � m ., ME � Q ;��Ilrk • mn1w1110 n11212tItIt EL (D '"�� mum= e° ' FOR: Ed Murphy r_u RE: 2S 113AB; 300/400/500 `�7 ti P2SII2DC; 1100/1100/1300 0 MO, ; ml72on111 151172C1T211 ��00��5 t\.-/ n1121teu11 al 1\ Y - 'n17e�1m 721121211500 & fj1111h Property owner information 1 ?! J1 is valid for 3 months from I _ ` \‘...(:, the date printed on this map. Ifillip 41111.• iv fU �1 •II : : m72uro111 nwtee, • \X ` 11 .50 1111uM101tt Cr) �,` S� ,,.., 1. ,\ 11112112th Nuf At / 731132110120 7211X1.110,100 Ro j t •• 721114100101 • 00���� 21na1e11e1 N = 1 41111 r�G Da 0 • 200 40(1 600 Feel Z 0 rummy n 1'=438 feet AI&O +11Ltll�, I City of Tigard m . in X J CO _ Information on this Is tor general location only end should be verified with the Development Services Division. 0.--. 111111.111MMINIIIMMemam MEI& 13125 SW Hall Blvd r* Tigard OR 07223 .._ (503)639-4171 -MI htt13126 Sn.cI.11gal Sled Community Development Plot date:Atm 16.2005:C:tmaaic\MAGIC03.APR • neighborhood meeting recor�. ,% Exhibit 13 • • • • LDC • DESIGN GROUP • • NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET • • • DATE: 77'05 PROJECT: Ac.irG�driwt e • • • • • Names Address Phone Number • • (I/ ///1 /7;i 5 2 E ."' —'"c"- 4-6') 6412. 0'703 cc-' • _ ,he ' .563_cey_0 36 0 • • ( no,ir, 9-tq suu ,„?1 So3 YSZ - '3 • • ( \A)01 -Ek,e.-LA a 3 S l�t5a_ - 8 5Z3--�Yr - Sg'( • � U--r-( k� R ©s •• �c_\"-- 14 V `erg 422.sT ia,k7- / i .5"'at3 4,97— 4.ze'.3 • L.d.v(Le..e::%3'4,11 • C-46"S 3 ooki).j Lk 5o3 -(nag- 5053 • li;llst,oro 1Olt q?121 • ' J d �. ri p1 S'7D3 , us', •3y,� �-i{4 5• ��°�Ll•� • 9 - • 1/t4u—p(/ 7F7s scJ Pada( s74.f sv3 7y_ y6zS • Yglc 40 2'0 • 44• P.4 di-6,f e79/, '—ii4- T V Z • • • • • • neighborhood meeting recor, ) ,' Exhibit 14 • • • • • • • • NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES • • • The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on September 7th after sending out a notice to • surrounding property owners and neighborhood representatives. Four neighbors attended the meeting. No one called for more information either before or after the meeting. No • additional comments were received after the meeting. • Among the attendees were Bill and Dianne Fagan and Ron Pulliam, owners of the Elmo • Studd's lumber yard property. There was discussion of the existing shared access (Fanno • Creek Place), and how that access could be used in the future as the main access to the Elmo Studd's property when it redevelops, assuming that the City would require the existing • accessway to be closed at that time. • Andrea Nadeao, who owns property north of the subject site, was the fourth neighboring • property owner at the meeting. There was general discussion about the potential impacts on property values, and what street improvements will be needed in the future. There was also discussion about the type and size of building(s) that would be constructed on the site • if the zone change application were to be approved. • There were no objections to the zone change raised by any of the property owners • attending the meeting. Further, the Fagan's and Mr. Pulliam did not object to the use of • Fanno Creek Place as one of the two primary accessways to the property, and were • receptive to the idea of a shared access agreement. • • Minutes prepared by Ed Murphy • • 9/08/2005 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • neighborhood meeting recor,l - ti Exhibit Is • • . • ' AFFIDAVIT .OF MAILING/POSTING NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE • l r✓3'y�� `RJ t w�rTyi (' "' '�Ll`,�? F:' x,11 =�, Et; �' ' i;J. '� 3V'yi � lPr' fir- i E o ;ift 0,od- -t';ll�.J'. ..'F �rA•!�• ` =;i am,: e,yr' 1, e'•,'.4•.Wit ,,' �ES V.�L�r f1 RI (i�' •'"'^�1?�r,i1 • ^',,,L •n.�+��,,.�i • k Q�TTji�'��tj� SQi��"i,L • b g•• ° •t,q A,( 1�•PY l'v w.• �i 4� �'�'f]�1�.��S!4�,�`''�f �,v ��a`t• �.-ary° ,;jFZ•'!j'e:7.`•�,{ ',���. r�-[�1'�.S"...-��f��.'�t. . '�".�•y:::*:11,'"A--*, n.��r�.�#,•�`'}r, @..vF;-t- .ti�jJ,,,+••y�'r��,1�"�y,�rh'11;����I�f d L i.��;" �i�„J � , ,,,,L �o , � rrC 7i. 6Y e�' a,,• ^ •; 1: `rtlii� '61 .i' •b•�7..11e7- L.lr �'iu,.'j7gl - 04.■• ..44 . ^7e .g' �� R:,r r "_��p. r,,� W -,, ,s' �.�,tS'. 1..�, ,'�� ?et ,-.4,,, `k-„,z.y'':.�:;::-i K y :�: r ,'-' Y 4'.., ,`5- :.'T.j— -g,g, � ''° ':.-r•n�0- i^'f } ;(Pq1.4 vy r .1 y; 'n,i '.t."•';'r:�3.-7«.`'i'_ .2` 'r' „, 4"N. . 'r ,spot-ie- el,, =-47-:;''.Q i�, .,', 'y_ `3.'"t 'eel/4K .7iq.s•;"'!q','t""yr•�;�}f �j -'7.1.y :; ],. :;?,1 • l•.hs�;'�aY.q,r....rl, -u+„,...e....1. 44 ',ii:1 e 4 ,,-- .ceMp�.a,•a`F+. f,,.., ',C`O 5 .,'9 ,,, !T'iak.' �a,».,:.Altar? ' n .a'�1 rv•'dA Z 1W��,y�'ir d: L•�s r 4 f'Lt' !'•' "'1i'? {�'t r •.`4,•-+,]},.9'js '+.�.•�t�`` 1��'.:�'y.` 1'f'-i���;f.rT �"aW����� �'`r '--I'�.k I- ''+,''4�*,, !4.1 i .- ' e- cgr. 2 Y•f f j. - n e fA .tir Irby -•i: �. f-,' "Y' � " `r•?� .a � �i' i• ;& �., `,x" u4'i ""���e d��'Iru�. �.•' 'ads r;, h r • 4 . ° a f PZ.• tik,. . , ``•LL ' 1 ” ``4. ;fl),1ir31- ,'Go-.E � ie1� `;:;i'-- `� 0 ;'P `q.°.�.�. MAILING: r • Ann Cannon • 1, ,being duly sworn,depose and say that on the 23rd. day of Aumfst , 20 05 , I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list,a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed • development at(or,pear) 16075 SW Upper Bpones Ferry Rd. ,a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made-a part of hereof. • • I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and-were deposited on the • date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at Aloclek Place,Hillsboro. , • with postage prepaid thereon. . • ., Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) • POSTING: • • 1, Ed Murphy , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed' zoning man amendment . affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no • address(s)and/or tax lot(s)currently registered) 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd. & 15930 SW 74th Ave. , • and did on the 24th day of August ,20 05' personally post notice Indicating that the site may be proposed.for a zone change . . application,and the time,date and place of a neighborhood meeting to • discuss the proposal. . • The sign was posted at 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd. (near Fanno Creek Place) • (state location you posted notice on property) ' • • Signs•ure (In th reenc of N tary•Public) • • (THIS SECTION FORA STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF O`e5c1N ) . • County of w ict,Sh.NsAo,•) ss. • ZL1 ' day of Avcvs* 2005 . • Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the y , • . . ..;„•.. ;„.,„, . . Ir'= ;.,' OFFICIAL SEAL �- % �� a 4-NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON • • ' `1 COMMISSION NO. 357181 ����,�-�„' • � � NOTARY PUBLIC OF-OREGON • My Commission Expires: .3<.) IN.Q • a -z ac Applicant,please complete the information below: • NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: 'TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: • • Address or General Location of Subject Property: . . • Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): , h:Uoginlpetty\masterslaffidavii ofmailing-posting neighborhood meeting.doc • - •• - -- 4,:, ,#: 42. 'da #.1*- 1::,:- :tt: ,.., ,',.. x, :,..t: * 4,— '''',* 444" ,t, ,1* 141: :Ilt:II 't 417:II :::A. 0 a 17: AR IN * 'r* * *- * * ''ig, 'V 4* * 43:' ','4' 47tr'' '''*16r '''i*:' -41 '1:::'"f '4 4. #.4' '''" '''....,.. ''`:•.--.: ~--.: 4.:r: 4. ........ .1:: ':- 4ttt ...: ..... ..... ::•.:...J:•••::: :::C.;.:••:•:- . .., . : • I:.Ig::::: ••• .. ••••.•: 1:....::i......• • 14 ::•:fox::: .• . . --•-••• ' - ••-.1•::::.....:11.::4"•:::•;.• .:. •••• .. ..: .• . . r ••• :r. 1::1Z.::::: '.. •-. • 7'•:,:K.,...::::....,..:: ' -... ;:::*:.::.J: ,........;:-. . .4••• '` ; . . : ••°-•?-44 ::::11):::•:.: 14. - ....- ...:.4;i'%•■••:,.- ....'..: e ' ....:.....:"- .., . . ..... • L..:::::ii mat rir, .1 :::.?:.:....lr.-.'+: ...--=,..•••••• ••-.4 MI ... - ::- :.. ..... .• .• ......... ••••••• • :::•:::•:::.......: .. . 1:••714:::.:: • - .,'' - - " " . • •••• • • ....., ••• --'•'i,::::,'...:. = 1 . . . . , •*. ... ._ . :..•.....•, ..: :. ". !:.::.Ci:::•::.:: -..,-.: .. .. . • ••• „ .. . . . ::•.:•: • --• .- .4t...••• .1.'..: • "11., ,A].: ..... ;- . ..mg . .1....?i i.,.... -...1.4..... .•,..:',.....,..,;.?. -,... .:,..4., 14:k fait. t.i..:::- f-t. 1:•••11,,,:.:.::- F. --... 4.::::::.•: 04• ...,. „.....„„:„.,............••••—•7. . . • , . . . . . ..—„,..004fie•••••••••.„:„:„.,...,,Hiii.fivi!!!!!!!:::::91:1.!6i?.:;i:::fa:i - I!- t . ...... . .. • ..:..: .. ..,:„........,..„,...............,..........:iyi:FF:::-,yiii,F•a•••::::::•:::.,,,,:••.•:.:.•:,•:::•:•••.:,,,Ti.i.••••.......:•••:.......................,., •••.: ,.....• .f.::::::•:::::::.::::.,....:::::::::.:::::::::::::::::•Ai..•••:,:::.:••,.,...,4.•...,,.....::::::::::.,...:., ...... -..••••••.••.• :.,,..,,,•:::1".:::•:••...., ::.•••-•• ..............•••••;•..........:,E.:••i• ....• ••...........%•• • •• ....••::::::••••••••••••••....•...••.••••i...,•••:••,.••• :II••::.iir.:..,••• i „, . 1 _ •••: ................:.....•• •• . •.••......•...............:;,:;i...iiiiiilliP....7...,;*7...n."'..7:7,.........!.?Hi...... n•:.-.....7.. .. • • ..._ ::... • .....w. • ,-1.:. :...•.-:::: --,............!1...ipt!,-.,* 1::.::1..•:: . . . .— •-."•;.,•:,.. •.. ,.. -f .,` k.:::.:.... .... - ...,, ' .. ......... ..........!•*:. 1.. ' , L ki 1%: r.:..1_1 1)a:'..:!. '''*'"•' e'"filiiii...4 Wfi 1Wile.4.... :::::(..tt .• ••••••:•:•,•:::::••••••••:::::•••.•••::::••'..:. , • . .......,.....:•:::•.•:•.:•.•:•....:•:•:•::•:•.•:•: ......f:::::::::.: , tz II: ; .. •-•:0; cm: • • -3 a3. ..•......' .t...,.*** •• :• . • .....t .• ii '.....i. F lt.,..;:4;;.:::* itz1174 C.7.1triii, • - . ..,. • ., :•:•::::::.:1:::::1 V., •••• •• .• if. •, . . 4 •iiiii.:1!".1'.: ' li.k • ':::=•:::::: i..:tigt;•::•:. ::.:::.::.•:::::: - . 1 ....4114:C1AL ".vit i. 1.4.,.'',' . • • ' Z I •1774--......• ..i.::. ilii....,. Nk..... '... iii a .• 4: 7."4" : - ' lint • . •:.: !.. .;"..;. :te • .. . ......_......._ . . . .. . • .• • '• • 0 4.-:..:::. . 1 ..:. ; .-- bi-:'. NI 1111r. : ,.. • . • • ••••• • • .1.••••••i.. •••A.....:•::::::::1144—it)4L..-- -•• '77 . ••dt'il I •:•4---- • . - : . •• • •• .... ''• ' • • Al.... P.':'!Iftleitel, ,..%•,,t..1 -iimpir..no......!.......plegnn....................... • . .. • - ,I41•ap, r•• ••4, m a m ienian . .. ..____... • ....::.:: • .. • ••• ...., .,•,..• . _ ..•••......„:„:„...,......:::•••••:„:„:„..............„::.::::„.. . ,:„,..,.::„:„........„...: ...•••••„•.: „:„::::::::::::::::::•::•::•••::::::•••:. . . •„,,,,, ..,:,,,„ 2-...,.., :: ::•::.:•: ......,,::::::::::::::::::::••••••.: ••• ••••.• •••••...•••••.. •..••••:.......„. • ..:::„.„ . M!na : .. . 1 I ,Iiir:::111,•:!•:•••:!•:!•:;•:'...****!.......'....'•:•.:.....,•,.....,...... ..,.....::::...:*•:...::::!•2:•;;;;;. • . : I.....I..'.... 1 1 I••['....1 !. ••••......,'... •I.1 .1...I. I . . . .••,•....,.,.....;;;......,,....:.,:.::.:.,,,:.•:.•,,•:;•:•:;•2,•:••:1:1:1:.•:::::••:••:.:.:................j.. .....,..:Iiiiigiliiii;ii;i:.., !: ..:•:::::' .,4; 4i:4 • .- ` • '- .. ..........:. ....• ,..... • :.::.:::.::: .?.,.. .!.•j'•'. .. ............. r';',,b 5.1•4 i 14444444i;411.'• .:.*1'1 .. )::.: :...., ..._ ii 4_Jr ,....•••.•:: : ... i 1 A• . ,e9: •: :P. ,. ,p7, ,,,, '1111.1 ''i .. :A:..1. - . •147":7. :::::..' .• - : .. ' 1 * III 1-11b 4 • I ri, . • •::..1.1::::::. .. t i••••••.....-., ..• .......... :::::.:.••:.....„ . — ..—... 'vista ef---1111111 ::.:.: •: $::: I. N i 1 i glir:V.•7:;,;.,:: .::'.. ... .... ... • :::::10.P.? ..11,1''''''''"''''t...•.,.,.••...,0:::..,..,.,„:?-•.•.2:: •*. '"moor"AS."."' ::.:':• •••• Av• -i 1.1 • -Fi:::.-c•it.:•:"1:!.... - : • ••• ••••. '..,-.. V. • -4 - . - - - ":'. .:4-1-f-1-ii„ i -......-4 . . Limitc.: i Retail • • • ,..•.............•000 .... ::.:.:•::::::. :............. :::::::::::::::::::: -.•••• ....,,,,,,. iii. • .. ..• ... •• • ,-...,••••„1:,::,,,4. -) • . . ., . . Ilidoor .......-..ilit.c.--tamment: ::::,,,.::•:. ::•:"......:. 1:•:•3:••g:. !::::•7.47:::.:. I:.:ikiii.•• :::•::.:::...:•:. :. • — — .,. - .: -IT, :-„2:-. z. ..,..,.... ...."-- ,',,'. -:1- • • 1 ',:',i'47 '-',..-. ''',42": "'."Y '1,r, -= - " *" ''' '''' '''' ''' .-** ''''' ''''''' '''''''' '''*'''' ::- .-.., '''''' ...".F 'F' ''.+4":' ',..- -E.' E' -IT .2: ....• ,... _. _ i'+'-, :":—: ,,':,: —,...„+„4:- .1:a.— --.4,,,.-- 4,,-T: —.'4; '1,—ii,- ,14,-- '''..--„:- ..-=:: ',rip •.^. .^^ ..... '."' ......„,„,,,... 1 . 1 ..----,— U • ' —' .-1 t' ' 6* Allowe I 1,1 :, i„ - , ,. ..-11 „ ne O ._ . . k •: . .. • 1 . x .4.0., ., • '''. 71%. iil i''. ..-"N,... -.0..-. "'....';:•-•: ' _ A : • .. ,, • • • • --1 .11r: . ": '.............!::: ..7.:177:11:11.R..i.P.:::::::::::.....::::::::::::::::::: : ' . : . . 40,1..44'.-.r. . !..i' ., ....•4. .'".f.'1.i.......:. '...,.„.......'fifi*:.%•':' °•••• =1• ' i. ... :ililliiiiiiiIiii$111.11. Riiiiiiiiiiiirigii,.....• . . . ,....•••••••••••• ...•:.•• "". 111:11.* • • • •••• . • • ....... • • •• ... — • - .". • ::'•-'44 .. • • . . . • .. • ::: •,. • , .. N -..---- . ••••• :111i1.1'. ..-"r . , ,•:•:... .....,.,....:•....z..., --,• - ••, .;,...:.......:...... ... ..,:•.•........ , ,.. . . ,...4•4•1‘,,,,,,,,i ....- ....:... - . .• -----7,-.1.„,..T.:,,,,,,..„„... .. !.•::.:.......• .• " ••• ,..,..,..,........ ., ••••-•......-„,: ,,,t.... , . ,4 P k -1311."1—::.••••••• ••.0444 iiii 77.•........ ••,....-..... -•::: ...•••.••••••'••'•m"•"'''''''''' •:••••••ii•.i•••..••11•4••1401.•:,1,1•••••••...:111,1:1•1::::::::::::Imil::::::::::::::::::iiihmr.111111:1 :: .. 64.1 i ... ,. 4,-,...m....!...!...........;4,..•• .... •• . . .... ... • •...... . . . -. .. . :.• .1 • .. .f.;A.S.: ... .....:45...;': ..-• ., , • . ,. . . . ' 4:- - ::':.:.-- - • . . • -•, • -• . . , . . . :. ,• . ,...4'7• :. ••• l'tr.,/. -'. ••-• ..,.......:..;.....,0'.'j.:1•.i : \I..t..it1'.''.:.,;.s.:'t..' .eg tM:.'O• ,.. I.* ..a...•.,L...•...,...•.•... ‘t ' i•44:0 4''",4,,. .. !:r 1i..—. ...4 ,..,—... 1 • ! .i :1. •,ft, •i s*Ie—t :::,.::.:::•:.:.:;:.:•.•. r 0 114 r , •.. . ' ——' .., . i Mt::::'t•••.1:::••.....e...4 1 • .. . ...,„. a. ..... • :• . ,-k._......i..,....A...•.„,...-L,,,,...t.. ,, --'41 ' 1411610A . - - i. --,.::r CM. '"*" . .... 7:::::::•:::::.!:P.:;::::;?:::::5:i:;:•.;1:1:.•%. . ...: • • - ----- •• .., •:•••:'•• . . :•1•••":7::•: ':_.:,_ . ''' :,.7'fr'.7.,.'•' •, ''..A- : .0 0.'. ,-;... " 4,i, ,,.t ..., .• • '• .•:...:::. ::•...•••::::•:•:::: ••••••• • ....• .• ,..• 4. .. •... : -- . ... ... . ..,.....„ . ....ifliki..z., ..• '•••••> '...•'.g••ii 10'.' L . -, . !„„„ P.' ..........•—• R V I.,...)t.I.... • .... ...,..4J I.••__S iliticili• ••'•...1-.......•••...•••••.4• . ..:........ ",•..„..E,•••.•:•••••••••,,,J.:„........*.w.11:::: ::•••••::lpisialk,:b.,:.......-.:..:0,::::•1*-1:1:;:•:•••;:.:1:.•••••••_.•: •• . .. .... •• Stor. Y - - ' - . . - ... ...., ::::::•::::•.::.:•:: .•:-.1..:1.--•••••••• • • • . 1 : ...;•:-.••••,:.;1:::'•:;:if,:•,..•:!...!•i:'.•:, - :.. .....: .• ':••:.::::::. .... •"".•.:.:; i : '... • ... . . 1 1 , 4., ..11 )•:' ......: L Ilif i I 1 • . .• ' - s. l'i.. •:-.1 1.'•... ..1.1...1 , •it t• : '', ...; . . ---', .)1., 1- .."-- . .... [ S ; .....01/2,ti ..r....lip, i :: ' '.1111,„, uh:•:;:::•:••• . ?:•• 7. ;..1,1' • : . ••••••••••,.:,, :::•••:••••••:.i.:. f:f::.:••• .:. ...-5,1ri.‘iiiilt1;iii 7 .:.'.,..--.--'7..2:•••,.. - ".'rsT1141„, •••::',...fli • 4 „.,..i • •<•';. • ' . • ;•.:li)::."4k. '`'•:,-....--.. - • . , A,.•. - •:.: :••••••;,...?.:44:44$?;• Fiti,44:it '....'••••Ii"A' :-": 'lit atiiiiiretdi,::::•::.. ...•.:.......k•.. „.. .. w.., ... • Li... - "I: .!...,"'``• -:::: E'':..::::7:!:::::::::::I;I•ITE... ''•••'E.+++, ‘44EE' ! •:•:.•-.::: ' tfi ;Ix ,.., .•, ...iiiii,,,,,*,,p,.....t 4...•...".•::j .•.'...:!;::::q4::::::ELF r ..I. .:„...:10M..,•:.;14.'mi.... • • fr":..4.1:.vo....:....:,. -.• .:.:.;.k.:-:.' ::I IR,r51.:::r.:: .'II:di!:iiiiiiiii... . ' . .... .:•::.:.::. . .•,.,.. . • i'.. ••••'•'.. : . 1:7T.::riliiiilif ig:::::gi:.:::::::':':::::i::i:::: ..! 40z.i:::::'''''''''''''''' ';....1. ..,,,..•• :: :•:.::.: • '• . IP 0 I4i/10 '1"! •• .. '''•' 411PS ........„„........-............ ...... . -- ' ' : '•••••:':••••••'''',..'i • -. . .." • ."•%:::::' . . . ... .„.. .•;.:::: 0. 1(4 —J-)r Se17 '....:-.; 1•••••.•:',..IN.:1,.••■;;-'4iift - •--- • ,r.... :•:•:: J: ::-.:•:.: ::••::::::::;.•:• :::::::• • • transportation impact analyse ) Exhibit K • • • • • • • • • • • SW Upper Boones • • • Ferry Road Rezone • • • • • • Tigard, Oregon • • • • • • • • • • • • • September 2005 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Transportation Impact Analysis • • • • SW Upper Boones Ferry • Road Rezone • • • • Tigard, Oregon • • • • Prepared For OPUS Northwest, LLC • 1500 SW First Avenue, Suite 1100 • Portland, OR 97201 • (503)916-8963 • • Prepared By: • Kittelson &Associates, Inc. 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 • Portland, OR 97205 ckV PROF • (503)228-5230 c���G`I N s`�,�'.� • 58353 • .v cc • Project Manager: Christopher Tiesler • �\ OREGON Project Principal:Julia Kuhn, P.E. • Project Analysts: Andrew Ooms - ).21,14494: • Project No. 7533.00 ;.E ires: 12-10,%1 O� • • September 2005 • • • • f: • • • • • • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Wone • September 2005 • Table of Contents • • Section 1 Executive Summary 2 • • Section 2 Introduction 6 • • Section 3 Existing Conditions 10 • • Section 4 Transportation Impact Analysis 19 • Section 5 Conclusions and Recommendations 35 • • Section 6 References 38 • • • Appendix A Traffic Count Data • Appendix B Description of Level-of-Service Methods and Criteria • Appendix C Existing Conditions Level-of-Service Worksheets • • Appendix D Crash Data Appendix E Year 2006 Background Traffic Level-of-Service Worksheets • Appendix F Year 2006 Total Traffic Level-of-Service Worksheets • • Appendix G Conceptual Mitigation Plan for SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Durham Road • Intersection • Appendix H Queuing Analysis Worksheets • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ICI Kittelson &Associates, Inc. • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road lane • • September 2005 • • List of Figures • Figure 1 Site Vicinity Map 7 • • Figure 2 Conceptual Site Plan 8 • Figure 3 Existing Lane Configurations and Traffic Control Devices 11 • • Figure 4 Existing Traffic Conditions, Weekday AM Peak Hour 14 • Figure 5 Existing Traffic Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour 15 • • Figure 6 2006 Background Traffic Conditions,Weekday AM Peak Hour 20 • Figure 7 2006 Background Traffic Conditions,Weekday PM Peak Hour 21 • • Figure 8 Estimated Trip Distribution Pattern 24 • • Figure 9 Net New Site-Generated Traffic Volumes,Weekday AM Peak Hour 25 • Figure 10 Net New Site-Generated Traffic Volumes, Weekday PM Peak Hour 26 • • Figure 11 2006 Total Traffic Conditions,Weekday AM Peak Hour 28 • Figure 12 2006 Total Traffic Conditions,Weekday PM Peak Hour 29 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ,`� Kitteison & Associates, Inc. i! • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road lane • September 2005 • • List of Tables • • Table 1 Existing Transportation Facilities and Roadway Designations 12 • • Table 2 Crash Summary for the Intersection of SW Upper Boones Ferry Road at SW Durham Road 16 • Table 3 Crash Summary for the Intersection of SW Upper Boones Ferry • Road at SW 72nd Avenue (North) 16 • Table 4 Crash Summary for the Intersection of SW Upper Boones Ferry • Road at SW Sequoia Parkway 17 • • Table 5 Estimated Site Trip Generation 23 • Table 6 95th-Percentile Vehicle Queuing Summary (Year 2006 Total Traffic • Conditions) 31 • • Table 7 95th-Percentile Vehicle Queuing Summary (Year 2006 Total Traffic Conditions—Mitigated Scenario) 32 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ' ;; Kitteison &Associates,_Inc. ii! • • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road ine • September 2005 • • Executive Summary • In conjunction with site development, OPUS Northwest is proposing to rezone 6.16 acres along the • northwest side of SW Upper Boones Ferry Road,just south of SW 72nn Avenue in Tigard, Oregon, from • light industrial (IL) to industrial park (IP). Two businesses and their offices currently occupy the site: • TruGreen Landcare and the McDougall Company. The McDougall Company office (immediately • adjacent to SW Upper Boones Ferry Road) will be retained on site while all other existing buildings will • likely be removed and replaced with an office park. Assuming the properties are rezoned, the new office park could be complete and fully operational in 2006. • • This study evaluates the near-term transportation impacts associated with the proposed rezone of the site • from its current IL zone (Light Industrial) to a new IP zone (Industrial Park), and accounts for the impacts associated with the proposal to develop an office park building, which is considered a. • reasonable worst-case land use under the proposed zoning. Both the current and proposed zones fall • under the "Industrial" designation , identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan. This industrial • designation in the comprehensive plan is used in the city's long-range planning for transportation • facilities, as is documented in the Transportation System Plan (TSP). • Upon redevelopment, the subject properties will be accessed from two existing driveways along SW • Upper Boones Ferry Road. One driveway is located at the north end of the site at the signalized SW • Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW 72nd Avenue intersection. The second driveway is located at the south end of property at an unsignalized location and is a shared access with the adjacent property owner • (Elmo Studd's). Today, two other site driveways exist along SW Upper Boones Ferry Road between the. • north and south driveway locations. These two driveways will be removed in conjunction with • redevelopment. The single driveway currently accessing SW 74th Avenue across the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF)rail line from the TruGreen Landscape property should also be removed. • • The results of this study show that an office park at this location could be developed while maintaining • acceptable traffic operations and safety at all study intersections and surrounding roadways in the site • vicinity, assuming provision of the recommended mitigation measures. The following sections summarize the study findings and conclusions. Additional details of the study methodology, findings, • and recommendations are provided within this report. • CONCLUSIONS • • Existing Conditions • • During the weekday a.m. and weekday p.m. peak hours, all study area intersections currently • operate acceptably, with the exception of the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Durham Road intersection. This intersection is currently operating at level of service (LOS) E and • near capacity during the weekday p.m. peak hour, but operates acceptably during the • weekday a.m. peak hour. • Year 2006 Background Conditions • • Operational analysis of year 2006 background traffic conditions indicates that all of the study • intersections are forecast to operate acceptably during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours, • with the exception of the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Durham Road intersection. This intersection is forecast to operate at LOS E with a volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio over • • Kitteison & Associates, Inc.tfi Executive Summary I 2 • i , Transportation Planning/Traffic c Engineering • • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Fikne W September 2005 • • 1.0 during the weekday p.m. peak hour, but function acceptably during the weekday a.m. • peak hour period. • Potential Development Activities • • The potential office park development could consist of up to 127,000 square-feet of office • park space. • • The site could to generate approximately 1,420 total net new daily trips, with approximately • 230 total net new trips occurring during the weekday a.m. peak hour, and 215 total net new trips occurring during the weekday p.m. peak hour. This estimate reflects the amount of net • new trips that will be generated by the potential office park in addition to what is already • being generated by the two existing businesses on site. • Year 2006 Total Traffic Conditions • • With the potential development, all of the intersections are forecast to operate in a similar • manner to that described under the background conditions. The SW Upper Boones Ferry • Road/SW Durham Road intersection is forecast to continue operating at LOS E with a v/c • ratio over 1.0 during the weekday p.m. peak hour, but function adequately during the weekday a.m. peak hour. All other intersections and access points will function acceptably. • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Durham Road Intersection • o Additional operational analysis indicates this intersection will function adequately at • a LOS D and with a v/c ratio of 0.89 during the weekday p.m. peak hour, with the • following improvements in place: • Construction of a second southbound through travel lane on SW Upper Boones Ferry Road, ending with an appropriate transition back to one through • travel lane south of the intersection. • • Maintaining an exclusive right-turn lane on the southbound approach of SW • Upper Boones Ferry and installing a right-turn overlap signal phase. • o Because insufficient right-of-way exists to construct the capacity enhancements identified for the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Durham Road intersection, • OPUS Northwest requests that the City earmark the estimated $372,000 in traffic • impact fees (TM) associated with the potential office park development for a future • capacity enhancement project at this intersection. With a preliminary cost estimate of $585,000 for improving the intersection (not including utilities and right-of-way • costs), the potential development has the ability to fund upwards of sixty percent of • the estimated improvement cost. • o Site traffic generated will represent approximately 2.5 percent of the total traffic • forecasted to travel through this intersection. Based on this finding, the TIF • contribution towards the future intersection improvement far exceeds the site- generated impacts at this intersection (64 percent TIF contribution versus 2.5 percent • traffic impact). • • A queuing analysis determined that with recommended future off-site transportation • improvements in place, sufficient lane storage will exist at the study intersections in the • immediate site vicinity on SW Upper Boones Ferry Road, including the SW Upper Boones • Ferry Road/SW Durham Road intersection. • Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Executive Summary I 3 • �' J Transportation Planning/Traffic Engineering • • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Fite September 2005 • • RECOMMENDATIONS • • To improve access spacing and minimize access points along SW Upper Boones Ferry Road, • the two existing driveways located between the north and south driveways should be closed in conjunction with development of the site. The single driveway accessing SW 74th Avenue • across the BNSF rail line from the TruGreen Landscape property should also be closed. • • OPUS Northwest requests that the City of Tigard earmark the estimated Traffic Impact Fee • of $372,000 that would be paid by the potential office park development towards a future • capacity enhancement project at the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Durham Road • intersection. The future project should add another southbound travel lane on SW Upper Boones Ferry Road, continuing through the intersection, with an appropriate design length • and taper to merge southbound traffic back into one travel lane. Additionally, an exclusive southbound right-turn lane should be maintained with an added right-turn overlap signal • phase. • • Landscaping along the site frontage of SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and SW Fanno Creek • Place should be maintained to ensure adequate sight distance at all site-access driveways. • • • • • ' • S • • • • • • • • • •S S S • S S S S Kittelson & Associates, inc. Executive Summary I 4 1_ �i Transportation PlanningTTralfie Engineering • • • SW Upper Boones Feny Road line • September 2005 • • Introduction • PROJECT DESCRIPTION • On behalf of property owners Akerman, Lathey, and LaRusso, OPUS Northwest is proposing a zone • change and a potential office park development along SW Upper Boones Ferry Road,just north of SW • Durham Road, in Tigard, Oregon. The project vicinity map is illustrated in Figure 1 with a conceptual • site plan shown in Figure 2. Two existing businesses currently occupy the site. The small office building in the northeast corner of the site and adjacent to SW Upper Boones Ferry Road will be retained, but the • other buildings on site will be removed in conjunction with the potential development. In their place, up • to 127,000 square feet of office park uses could be developed on the site. Assuming city approval of the • proposed rezone,the office park could be completed in year 2006. • SCOPE OF THE REPORT • The analysis contained in this report identifies the transportation-related impacts associated with the • proposed zone change for the entire site from IL (Light Industrial) to IP (Industrial Park), including the transportation-related impacts associated with the forthcoming development application. This study was • prepared based on a review of the local transportation system and the development code of the City of • Tigard, and direction provided by City of Tigard at the pre-application conference. The study • intersections and overall study area for this project are shown in Figure 1, with operational analyses performed at the following study intersections: • • • SW Durham Road/SW 74th Avenue; • • SW Durham Road/SW Upper Boones Ferry Road; • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/Elmo Studd's Driveway; • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Fanno Creek Place (private driveway); • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/PacTrust Driveway; • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/TruGreen Driveway (south); • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/TruGreen Driveway (north); • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW 72nd Avenue (south); • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW 72nd Avenue (north); and, • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Sequoia Parkway. • • This report addresses the following transportation issues: • • Existing year 2005 land use and transportation system conditions within the site vicinity; • • Planned developments and transportation improvements in the study area; • • Forecast year 2006 background traffic conditions during the weekday a.m. and weekday p.m. • peak periods; • Trip generation and distribution estimates for the current uses on site and for the potential • uses under the new zoning designation; • • Forecast year 2006 total traffic conditions with full build-out of the site under the potential • zone during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak periods; • A review of on-site traffic operations and circulation, vehicle queuing, and turn lanes needs; • and, • • Conclusions and recommendations. • • • Kittelson & Inc. Introduction � • j', 6 Transportation Planning/Traffic Engineering • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • H:Iprojfile17533-Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezoneldwgslflgs17533FIGS.dwg Sep 22,2005-9:15am- ctiesler Layout Tab:FIG 01 O Il 1\ • r„cn g A v / O co co 0 N W // SW UPPER e0o Oa m 5g C) I / 2�s m O / TZ'p co cn Z / 'PA- m T 2 s / -O ° / ,»\z- , 3AV H14L MS • / n ,_ ' BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RR / 0 0 —1CD-r— 7--O O �F y nt, „Y / / JAY ONZL MS 3AV dNZL MS /�m a s G F.� F / 9<9 S SFQU ma pKty .. 0 OZ0 40�' 1), •rff r/ t51,,, I N \� ,. GI ____ ...., 0? Onco Z"0 z m O c _ - Cl Do r o m m 1 cn • • Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone September 2005••• �`�' '�d 1Y � r,rmr :� I ,fir +6 ..��•"� r`& !�-'a% ■ � :3'i<f,' t - .„ 4 5 e x h < d. .'.. eSk iA ..'^n .., .'.• 'y •;iv• `v±t' ,p. k'x.X , #� .r ,r yL ,,• s- !p'v: .,}fin il�¢,c;%:.* c�.: ,�R tIK-M* .r;r ,,x `ice "•ti:AF' - 't* t y ' �"I� t r s.�.�t, �',?'< 7.ri r .+��,,�`. #�1`'d�#.. '{:;., s • aT �i����K�,A ",'. .,.::::'.5i7..'......,,^fir'±{�� .a'� ce" �i.v,�z.• 3 L.` 1. 4- x#�f -4 .' -. `.'t8 .''6 fi 1", ' :. a t' `3.: 5'V—,.,,, . - :44 '.. -a`',,\ r 4rt5"r T CLOSE EXISTING • ?' n'3 t 4� • - i ' " 4, ,�..,:',,� : -x ' ., • r� ter' � - ., >E t _� a x�rS a�1 ; `" + 'DRIVEWAY r, S .. •A ' '�� » i ' �-',- -44- ems` 4 +}' ,� _^tlfi ..,1,, ,,, Ce t Y , . ,..„ r 9 ,`x. ,y y kdf,a,r ".r,-.1`T 's{^° . do�',^ #S�JF R ',yy,-4'i a,' �j�,' !rt Y +� �y7- ii #4 y'�` .:ur' �'' r°' ..a, i y;:,s R� m l M i F 1' �- • ,ky, �., I ' a +�' r' ' i� rf ,yam• r...�-' i•A+,{, .`4•A ''"" ,Kt htn. t *d ��pT "�; • 3yy, ` aF� "y+ v rz.. �i n v e ""3�- _ c. -krVr;ift F rs,S!3w rryx . ', Sm, � ,. .�5 t_ t � ;4"y `L .a ''' Wt..,‘ a 3 ' c;ti 1— —'a�gs'z �'41 ,. L w Afi a'r '`*" ARV. r! � i.il. ::; ,.' y. ti•}�'x"''ky., i _ `.I _ x S`'.^t.y�4i i• • .P g'�<a�" ,t �. 'r * i7 r.V� ?�. -+'""^>Y�, '',' TY ..e,rt+'� Y . t y'} A^'•� t,i' �r,, .1 s ,.In h' K ,s ea ch# = '.i? H �.; ., r. T tR. �+ ; » ":,X:_6 f tp-.:. i,,_ 5 _ '..� -•: f 1 F { 'Se i� y eft'?'' titi 'I •;,,,..3 -,„Ai ��;� +t • �y ' •.7,4r ' .E;. 4...'�1.•Y, NY • z. _, ,._ d Y j ' S�. � u• ", •ds y.S h lam+.+:;• ��t�yy� ,,{{jyyc p''i i " ,'_°i r;'�p„ 'I.' g � ,t, `, i•4it,- C Y at?,i,#�'d�•' :Z >.a k i ;•,..,-m-:• o 1... a \« 1� .4 y y• i �'�rt� ., t'_,yV,tr +a • „g i Z'a r; << 'Y�^ yba a;'Ik, ,•A.-„t4.--*,,,,,,,, !~ ,,'4.1-4,-, .:4:.�`ls 1, ' 1 ."rf-t,s' i t,- ;7,7-", � '� t �i v*�,� F:"�,�,.17...•-;,..;-,c.1.7.,''... �,, -"�.;' � r+Sy �,�.. �, � •.qp .0.47;i:`'....‘.:',';yj''� "�ii� �tL��.�«i..�'� "Q3`P°?, �d.�C • fk ,q0�k 4# y a. .� 4, ,-6��-a'v +p z< / sL_ t',....2,:-...: M1 A( .�'':as., � i '`' y'`�-• ° ter c wrY.'`^' �.- • Sp' i z, '' k , �' a u �a � lywa 'yy` s °yt ' -`', EXISTINGACCESSt kr 4a•;. .11'S 'a •� ^y;&' L ''''.-t,e .. :;..,"4Y'' - `' ' >,;` - 44. ° ;�;• ,s;' •-- ," ; • ,• d� ., , • ,cw• 1 ,,,,l§r'ty- ., 's" o; 1 ,•„,. m i,i k '` 'i•,'TO BE MAINTAINED ? -+" `I' .�', • ��,:�a-n n.4,;,..4.'0';''',t,4. ,� •v D , �.�,,, �._ d'« -m„pars}y� J 1`ah . '�,., �y fie:^°^ ,�y� �.�.�. t�; y�� ,, • .. :rT- Ida+, Art , e v;.x ^�'^ ,- ", Dy k.4. h;1, R^` ?ti,'-...'� Yip• :/ -:,A, .t • ,. ",,,,,, +' k "+ t '�d ,,' <° .� t E.i,(;G`V e4 a �i4zi.ar `t, z4`'a,- / �'� {� ? .%.∎.1''4t,,^" , ' "`',t,/,4 '+`ttvi. '' v b'+t` B�• ft Ill-t` a; Yu ,. �C'�e,,,,o),A, "FiF �,.u.` ,y`'l - y, vJ"+•t�S I•k' , 1 ° '.rr''',.•A- '#, ''s*;A ?^ ,.�r' r�1ay�....�. -"y*tr'. .. ,. ,u. ,z .r"- ^,'' ;•5r'a` d�J` , ? ? rr, ' a'� r: " yt tt• :,• :, �..�' ';m*' ,3 M. �`,u., f t.a t µ� ''s•-h` �r. Y��,�4 .t X' N.\:;,_" .+, yt i . • „*..„4.5-4,,,v,...:,,S a` r ".,$ d.r . -i : ,'.-i �lr” y aa',/`,41, 1:,:' ,': ,1; s,., .g... + , �t,cv �, ., w, c" 'i /4,,- ;,.„/, ..,.,,,,,;.7,..a,,, A'' iP• , ti t a,j • y `u a y,t y '. t'.a 7- K t .xt k »' T` :, .." :r,�",`5t�» r';" >.. .\�� «• a $ f t':., t }.,,'G,�i..'n -....,'h? r 1 `''',?.',',e,,,;',. � - t i''a,L, ' '.:' -." :3 a' a tti' a3f o. _ • h "t<.:x$ "�•F°A, ro >: 4'. ' ° 1'44, y i,Nr.-0.�.�1:4..rrs. „ Y':m• +' +s Jti,d •+ i. 'a' 0.t.'-a'.�i -, � 4 4�. �� ,~ . c 44,..,5„;. �, w- '°� i, ,�,a�tE''ry, .z: i� � � v� �,IG,3sr«'r d -;�,4�x „,5 •• �i s �,a rF a +jm° . ,„.• - ,.: �t ,at`r..Q,r k' `a"r`a z' -P l ,a1r' "\ J ::, y '!fit \ ' ,' +f 4Rti t, � ,,i.,•,M1 4,;,,,,,:.i � -,,k ,,,tAlr, 'i'>.,l'. �' •s" s• .104 q a w, N i ".°,+ .3.,...1' w•,..zi ',�;.t,, . '' r `.`$ r . 'K,a,'th ht r �'Cs ol,„ ,`"' �",! a d,$"" „+-i.p% F:.rf�'J ..:- 0 , 'I' r{"!t • o s r' tt�£�y 'a. c .. sr �} � fi ' d $ . "Z I- is•• �''ZE1:m ;?; z;, Y :q ? 5 . '"v,.: ' ..s i' `�' '�,' q t-. r'' =.r'�`,.`4 i•�>-ar, r .i. 'r t 4^�' i as t!•o K• e r �.., -J t.7,. f,y ^'e ..,;.:4,s4.-- h` , tXr. 1w ..a. ,,� - 4'4411%.,..--,_, , 4 .-, - ,t: i . a . .� 1-.. I '. p»• 'r "1a, t'� 5+'(.", ,," .,, T •c 3t a ,ea41N' a^$_ 1 _ ;. , y t '�?!y,�t•'2b; y . t , ,, , y, , °,Y : , j, N6-'.0-1, • ' Q, a. .4/s,j.omi r ,, =S - 7F b i;',,,'$.si,A T S..i1,,1` 0:4.44 ,. y t t• ,>, a. h N`�.'� -,'�isi, a . '; x 11, a ' k;z 111+7 �" i)) Hk L' .m,"'- 11 ��w��.; ., r -,:'d`V.,,V. ",'t'�.3,•�, " Q9y �r 've tiv ..... �4 `�� '1 ,j' j` Y 1 a �,et. 1 ' �M�N'.•:... i+�1`' 4. 4. E ''"+x• -.Vii` k,XP �,, ale ,—„, '' .-C ,i�"'t _-T '�+ .. -• t m Y'! , l'. . � '�e� `;m-c���`t�� , '��,�•!� '� r �,� t�'^ �'>�'�r.�•�''Q' � �= CLOSE EXISTING �+'"`�" t � 3� ;• E? .1.-;'': s, rs ; a Y .4 Y�lay�'' r,� ,cy 'n "' <c „f f..,.. :'DRIVEWAYS,„:,,,,,,, ' ,. :�. ` di Ci '�r gG•t? fi,-:.S'`-4:,�it k: •'p-.i.a l ` h ' 9 ; ' ^,4aa c•^ ,,..K.g%e j. 'a4, i y` .....,_fir. x4 r.1 ,�+y'a' �i 3, '» 4* 1` i,' s. as •Yi' • '4 rn- vs t '�•t'c, rt}`'f t",r,:7,". ,i' n'f��:�`.:.'Mf� (.� .s t. �``����`�}•,." t a.a� ',p�, 'Y �F a»•• O ue 4-7.-=-1•40-4,.14t-' ,.*.. y°�V,x. -.• t''tja r','...I- -va. "•y"' ,4`n w J y44,, +i'•N q t �, f ate/ t ..c>:=. t`•w. d •Pi S �N1i- ,�" it ,`, ,15,,,.......Q.1.!yy s a h $t. ,NV fl,". ,,'''''''''3' .,,. $EXISTING ACCESS s F' "' ►4,,,,,- Q ,+<° '' ', c:.! 1 -, k `" , N .' n �' "a TO BE MAINTAINED t� b',r6' p @i' i' b u ra ;;IiI•• y _ i ryp Y d"�,i 4 p1 �"'. I i• k' uj,•^"4 O) �C,r -.-23.-ft:-,4,.Y'i. � .6} to .••4� i'fi '- .. a. ' 't` 4...;..*. ., .. }e it } Wl.to tl�o• r'4 .41ei'e_:�;xr�,r�.,"t#, r 'ea"E '�'fi `' "" :? �t' • 5 t�j 'itr.'. + -+L r'J�y� h ' .F''' dy,,r,. /, y'G c 4N. (. 4vz+'• �K� V. ,!-';',•-• i _ rN '4 { i; �'4_ .M ri w ,�T. • < a ,� 6i `�j� x »"w .t "03t+ ,/�• � '7n/r L ! t«ip 8•,ti , ., , S a'. : ." 1'3,-' nth„ }fix 1'.d -4• . ., .,I}µµp'''' ,� :•^T i,�nyY, iaj'�y-'3 T',•• h .'+�2 �YM1,;y�,. �f 8'.1 >I.. . a r? '4 i_.,,,,,_. ,; �' '' '• .7 -;'' .:7!,e`' !it,am 2) et { �9r °'. �(L.ya,�'^»i? ''''-•',' s, N ' 4'V 7 .... Y ,,, , y!'l SF r i 4,#.--71,. + ,a„•F ,t ft:.;. : SQ , '" `f .. 'h4',44„V v �'S� �. ':+.. [{x s� 4 ^ S'� �_ `'� ,� Ni.,,',„ yr ,,. 1�>f ar ��yit,(� • • A' 4„ell* �, 4 %S5t_i, r 1 �4. :; .¢ ,f' t�;it' , 'w '��, t •M, 'FL`4,.• ilk I. mC r'�!'• v` • P / � ' {�k n S�r�'F t..3:7... �� r$ p9 �f } c . �^ S t N% N ,' S k .:'• 4'� ;� ,*' f'4a - =i ,T; }: '/'T'er t w ll tt, s...c. `aH 4 iy < • =asl ,S - Y`,i45; . e rte,' ¢o 4 4.' • 2 y? ct' ;,_i» �" �'c. ` -"'.:°C.s' • 1, 1 a IA -,4.''l''''+'4"*. ;."�, . g{ 4. . •.' :, .--,- „*..k.=:: " s:.va � � �f v � :�x .,�yt L �r ; �M. n y r• .:.,,, �Q 4y9� ��d{an 53�t�s,{ l'•' 1> p 9-' � r� '+�1•,'"•.-„, :� •t N. i•' ' 1 ∎ R z:1. ' v ',:!:4-.1k,;' r"`4 .•,,,,e,1\ r zk. .Y a ' -r ,, ; xtl c k , ' 3, , • LD '"LS. i" Y w 471. x t,q - ,' 4 1 l 'x°'17 A„ ' ,�^ t € t +i. -a�,{ ..,! Al .a�K 4 R• t,f..t Y J.i t '�: $'y R+ '1 7 22tt " ■ Gi '�5� d ♦ '• ya' .e^ s kRn Y .. X .P Y `b "t *• s Y b i,M'4 °7 d t fl.yx"Y 'fi t �'ai' A Ya . } 7a ' .:,. ->� s;a r`. ,. ' .' y'. .;:x�.... '• 4.4.t..,y t i. ,r tw-Y1�!. 2-e ,,, ••''1"11`' 44, a,t. • S' Z «>, . '., a>i, � '°t ,` x '', 2't .,., Ta ,^ , n q r� Kk'+ a .' v s.�" 4 • y ."4 �' •r'r�'r•L" -t"'>} r ,S',4,...m, 'S �' �1 v.:_ -.v'', = �:�' �!-4'"', a:.� {� �k $.�u,5 •.r`!� r .. f, ,' « -. ..,'S, �, ;. F#f.,�>v. 7;.--,- . , ••i Nt1 .''' i'.r+ °�.:$s- 'sa . • 1.474'r ,. `�y.:n 4,. . • ,,,�,,* '0 �,,:n .( ,•,... N t ,,,.., ... } �,,.r..-l; F.0:, 'y -'��' t }.{4- '•-- Us y°,„V.,,,&':+"1.Sdi*�'f •4.,,/,»- -- - 7. . � 0 .yea is��j1 y ,.4-,e.:s Jt t q;7 _. £ P ,�k i tv,--...,•43'� �. t ,, 4 SCft;.: --,,:-L,2,.;.,' F:g,” k.'•>t'` M A�''.'. t': ,^�^' . ,u • a``�"+ }� 'i^`� 4.: • •-- . '-''''"'GA....i.. :)..rb'Y..o-• _..,. ,i`M�w'P, . �.i... " .,_,.i; "f.. ••.s.: r aLE -s i L'- ' P.. J.i.::"!a9. a. 'p;:.Y+f s CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN FIGURE • = TIGARD, OREGON 2 — KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING • • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road*one • September 2005 • • Existing Conditions • The existing conditions analysis identifies site conditions and the current operational and geometric • characteristics of roadways within the study area. The purpose of this section is to set the stage for a • basis of comparison to future conditions. • The site of the potential development was visited and inventoried in July and August 2005. At that time, information was collected regarding site conditions, adjacent land uses, existing traffic volumes, • operations, and transportation facilities in the study area. I • SITE CONDITIONS AND ADJACENT LAND USES • The site is currently occupied by two businesses and their offices, and is currently zoned IL (Light Industrial). The site is bordered to the north by industrial and retail uses, to the west by the Burlington • Northern Santa Fe railroad line and other industrial and retail buildings, to the east by SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and the PacTrust office complex, and to the south by a small lumber yard(Elmo Studd's). • TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES • • Roadway Facilities • As indicated in Figure 1, primary access to the site will be provided via one site access driveway located at the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW 72°a Avenue intersection and one driveway onto SW Fanno • Creek Place. All roads in the study area are operated and maintained by the City of Tigard, with the • exception of SW Fanno Creek Place, which is a private driveway. • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and SW Durham Road are classified as Arterials in the City of Tigard's • Transportation System Plan (TSP), and in the vicinity of the site, have typical three-lane cross-sections • with one travel lane in each direction and a center left-turn lane. The posted speed limit along both • facilities is 35 miles-per-hour. • SW 72nd Avenue is classified as a Major Collector in the City's TSP, and in the vicinity of the site, has one travel lane in each direction with a center left-turn lane. The posted speed limit is 35 miles-per- • hour. • Table 1 provides a more detailed summary of the existing conditions along the roadway facilities • evaluated in this study and Figure 3 identifies the existing lane configurations and traffic control devices •- at all identified study intersections. • Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities • No sidewalk currently exists along the northwest side of SW Upper Boones Ferry Road along the site • frontage or along the adjacent property to the south (Elmo Studd's), though continuous sidewalks are • provided on the east side of the street. Sidewalks and bike lanes are provided along both sides of SW • Durham Road, and sidewalks are provided along both sides of SW 72° Avenue. • • • • • Kittelson &Associates, inc. Existing Conditions 10 • ;',, ‘J Transportation Planning/Traffic Engineering 711 om (n O z z >Ra (I) �N �o -ai PM O N z 2 6) •--• • •--Ce, %4 H:IproJile17533-Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezoneldwgslfigs17533F1GS.dwg Sep 22,2005-9:15am- ctiesler Layout Tab:FIG 03 Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone • • 3A`d H1VL MS 4-1 -H-1 I I 1 I I „IA BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RR Soot Jagwe des • • • • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Rezone September 2005 • Table 1 • Existing Transportation Facilities and Roadway Designations • Cross Speed Side- Bicycle On-Street • Roadway Classification Section Limit walks Lanes Parking SW Upper Boones Arterial 3-lane 35 mph Yes' No No • Ferry Road (City of Tigard) • SW Durham Road Arterial (City of Tigard) 3-lane 35 mph Yes Yes No • SW 72nd Avenue Major Collector 3-lane • 35 mph Yes No No • (North) (City of Tigard) SW 72nd Avenue Major Collector 3-lane 35 mph Yes2 No No • (South) (City of Tigard) • SW 74th Avenue Local Street (City of Tigard) 2-lane 25 mph Partial3 No No • SW Sequoia Minor Collector 3-lane 35 mph Yes No No • Parkway (City of Tigard) 1 A continuous sidewalk is provided on both sides of SW Upper Boones Ferry Road north of the site. Along the • site frontage,sidewalks are provided only on the east side of the street. • 2 Sidewalks are provided intermittently along SW 72"d Avenue, primarily along the west side of the street. • 3 Sidewalks are provided along the west side of the street. • Transit Facilities • As described below, three Tri-Met bus routes provide service in the vicinity of the site (Reference 1). • • Route 38: Boones Ferry Road provides service between Portland City Center and Tualatin and travels along SW 72°' Avenue in the vicinity of the site. Service is provided Monday through Friday during • morning and evening peak periods at approximately 30-minute headways. No weekend service is • provided. • Route 76: Beaverton/Tualatin provides service between Beaverton and Tualatin, traveling along SW • 72' Avenue and SW Durham Road in the vicinity of the site. Service is provided Monday through • Saturday at approximately 15-minute headways, and on Sunday at approximately one hour headways. • Route 96: Tualatin/I-5 provides service between Portland City Center and Commerce Circle and travels • along SW 72' Avenue in the vicinity of the site. Service is provided Monday through Friday during • morning and evening peak periods at approximately 30-minute headways. No weekend service is • provided. • TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND PEAK HOUR OPERATIONS • Manual turning movement counts were obtained at the study intersections in the vicinity of the site on a • mid-week day in August 2005. All traffic counts were conducted during the weekday morning (7:00 • a.m. — 9:00 a.m.) and weekday evening (4:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m.) peak periods. The turning movement • counts from the weekday a.m. and weekday p.m. peak hours were summarized and rounded to the nearest five vehicles per hour as shown in Figures 4 and 5. The weekday morning peak hour for the • entire study area was found to occur between 7:15 and 8:15 a.m., and the weekday evening peak hour • between 4:45 and 5:45 p.m. Appendix "A" contains the traffic count sheets used in this study. • • • • • Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Existing Conditions I 12 r.;;: 1 r I'�:, Transportation PlanningfTrafftc Engineering • • • • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Rezone September 2005 • Current Levels of Service • All level-of-service analyses described in this report were performed in accordance with the procedures • stated in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (Reference 2). A description of level of service and the • criteria by which they are determined is presented in Appendix "B." Appendix `B" also indicates how level of service (LOS) is measured and what is generally considered the acceptable range of level of • service. • All study intersections are under the jurisdiction of the City of Tigard. The City of Tigard's development review policy supports a LOS "D" and volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio of 0.95 or better • standard for signalized intersections and LOS "E" or better for unsignalized intersections. • To ensure that this analysis was based on a reasonable worst-case scenario, the peak 15-minute flow rates during the weekday a.m. and weekday p.m. peak hours were used in the evaluation of all • intersection levels of service and volume-to-capacity ratios. For this reason, the analyses reflect • conditions that are only likely to occur for 15 minutes out of each average peak hour. Traffic conditions • during all other weekday hours will likely operate under better conditions than those described in this • report. • Using the weekday a.m. and weekday p.m. peak hour traffic volumes, volume-to-capacity ratios and • levels of service were calculated for all the study intersections as shown in Figures 4 and 5. As indicated in the figures, all but one of the study intersections are shown operate acceptably. The SW Upper • Boones Ferry Road/SW Durham Road intersection is currently functioning at LOS E and near capacity • with a v/c ratio of 0.94 during the weekday p.m. peak hour. Appendix "C" includes the existing • conditions level-of-service worksheets. • Traffic Safety • The crash histories of key study intersections in the vicinity of the site were reviewed in an effort to • identify if any potential intersection safety issues occur. Crash records were obtained from ODOT for • the most recent five-year period from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2004. All crash data including the calculations for crash rates are provided in Appendix "D" of this report. A summary of • the crash data is provided in Tables 2 through 4. Also shown in these tables are the calculations for • intersection crash rates, which are expressed in crashes per million entering vehicles (MEV) for • evaluation purposes. Base on these rates, the patterns amongst the crashes were evaluated to determine if there are any operational or geometric deficiencies that are potentially contributing to the crash • patterns. • • • • • • • • • • • • • Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Existing Conditions I 13 L:;•:1 Transportation Planning/Traffic Engineering • • • • Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone • September 2005 • • ?: �5F ' ,5 (NO SCALE) rai ni cii • g m o ni N v cD w)J m LI n. cn i N /7) �� ° 4-/ ti c os T a • o �we oz � s°505 ‘94/`'eso ��p `► � • • • • LOS=D 9hg O` 1 CC t 1 Z I z m v o m 7 • JQ �aQ p O •CO 6,"i 5� yeQ $ , L.O.S 1=56.7 l Del=J v/c=o.s3 t � l � LOS=C IL 5,o--0.- Del=24.1 5 5 v/c=0.67 440 1\ t ( T a m T .v • 5V M � C�'.c s ,�y 0 -PP cr • •O m a a 3 �- • Iv • • • m o �7-4.• LOS=B. . • • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • ' • • • • '.'.:-'--TR tii:., Del=14.3 1 V/C=0.68 �� �1 y -► sr.(90 • � `--P- V—;\C30 s C CM=EB LOS=A 1Del=c5.0 v/c=o.0, h ,L Del=39.7 I LL V/C=0.79 �o o s y h a5� LOSEA • m 1\ 'p �♦ F,1 pad ,o `� �� N Del=<5.0 o ��5 � \ / /l CM WBR 1 V/C=0.01 m 6 4-, t. i CM=EB /� CM EB LOS=C Z.' 11...4, LOS=C Del=15.4 • LEGEND D l 14.s 1 v/C=0.05 v/C=o.o, * 0T • V/C=0.04 c4OD F' f1 'o z CM=CRITICAL MOVEMENT(UNSIGNALIZED) �h • a LOS=INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE •I9° m° 's (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL P' OF SERVICE(UNSIGNALIZED) Del=INTERSECTION AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY • o (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT CONTROL 1 .s DELAY(UNSIGNALIZED) EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FIGURE • /C=CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR 1 \.. TIGARD, OREGON 4 • KKITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. TRANSPOgTAnON PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING; • Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone September 2005 I. 8 5.,‘, ay (NO SCALE) O \‘i F�A 60 A "5 LOS=C Del=23.2 V/C=0.64 0y0� AN 5.---i■ .....Nic • 2 2 z z o rA) 1 24. - 10- LOS=C -60 n7 - 50� Del=31.0 F 25 10- V/C=o.78 c 495 '\ t(Tcci, ' Del=22.1 13 840 V/C=0.71 Lu • 1 C7 co Imo. a T y V/C=0.03 3 cy,0 000`, NO �h ¢ LOS=E ; `� /# t Del=55.6 ►►II /r V/C=0.94 t"--..- s 0� CM=E6 . R O LOS C c 00 \� rT� F�3g00 S ~ / /, 1 Del=18.3 CO I,3,�• �\ v-0 f ` CM EB C LOS-C f ♦L V/C=0.03 �r S LOS-A LOS--C Del=19.6 ��'g • • LEGEND \ 1 Del=<5.0 �C-0� �V/C 002 } tk V/C=0.01 ` . z CM=CRITICAL MOVEMENT(UNSIGNALIZED) ah / 'y �yy�• 4„, 9 r o LOS=INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ° `� o (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL I OF SERVICE(UNSIGNALIZED) Del=INTERSECTION AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY • (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT CONTROL 1 s DELAY(UNSIGNALIZED) EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FIGURE • . V/C—CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR 5 17.<1 TIGARD,OREGON • KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. P TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING • • • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Rezone September 2005 0 • Table 2 Crash Summary for the Intersection of • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road at SW Durham Road • Collision Type (PDO', Injury) Total Year Crashes • Rear-End Angle Turning Other • I 2000 1 1 (0,1) (0,1) 0 0 2 • 2001 0) 0 0 (11 0) 3 • •• 2002 0 0 0 0 0 • 2003 2 1 1 (2,0) (0,1) (1,0) • 0 4 2 1 1 • 2004 (1,1) (1,0) (1,0) 0 4 • Total 7 3 2 1 13 • Crash Rate = 0.25 crashes/MEV2 • 1 PDO = Property Damage Only 2 MEV = Million Entering Vehicles • . Ill Table 3 • Crash Summary for the Intersection of • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road at SW 72nd Avenue (North) • Year Collision Type (PDO', Injury) Total • Rear-End Angle Turning Other Crashes • 2000 1 (1,0) 0 1(1 0) 0 2 • 1 2001 (1,0) 0 0) 0 3 •• 2002 (121) 0 0 0 2 • 3 3 • 2003 (3,0) 0 0 6 (1,2) 2 1 • 2004 0 0 (2,0) (1,0) 3 • Total 7 0 8 1 16 • Crash Rate = 0.40 crashes/MEV2 • ' PDO = Property Damage Only 2 MEV = Million Entering Vehicles 0 S S 0 0 0 0 • -r,-ri' Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Existing Conditions >6 • ?: ., i v j_..,-,'+ Transportation Planning/Tratfic Engineering • • • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road R•ne September 2005 • Table 4 . . • Crash Summary for the Intersection of SW Upper Boones Ferry Road at SW Sequoia Parkway • Collision Type (PDO1, Injury) Total • Year Rear-End Angle Turning Other Crashes • • 2000 (1,0) 0 (0,1) 0 2 • 2001 0 0 (110) 0 1 • 2002 (121 j 0 0 0 2 • 2003 0 0 (2 0) 0 2 • 2004 0 0 (1,0) 0 1 • Total 3 0 5 0 8 • Crash Rate = 0.19 crashes/MEV2 1 PDO = Property Damage Only • 2 MEV = Million Entering Vehicles • • As shown in Tables 2 through 4, all of the intersections exhibited a low crash rate, well below 1.0 per • MEV. Further, there were no apparent trends amongst the crash types to suggest further investigation is necessary. Also, there were no reported accidents at the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW 7211d • Avenue (South) intersection. • • Additionally, a review was conducted of the Safety Priority Index System (SPIS) database of high crash locations in Washington County. This system is used to help identify existing hazard locations. • According to the 2000-2002 SPIS database (the most recent on record), none of the study area • intersections are ranked as high accident SPIS locations. 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 • 0 • • • • • • '''K Kittelson & Associates, inc. Existing Conditions I 17 • •iw.°v•; Transportation Planning/Traffic Engineering C Q> � � c � O� N cd F- • • • . . . ! . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ` • • • • 0 • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Rezone September 2005 • • • Transportation Impact Analysis • The transportation impact analysis identifies how the study area's transportation system will operate in the year that the potential office park development is fully built-out and occupied. The impact of traffic • generated by the potential development during typical weekday a.m. and weekday p.m. peak hours was • examined as outlined below. • • Planned developments and transportation improvements in the site vicinity were identified and reviewed. • • Background weekday a.m. and weekday p.m. peak hour traffic conditions for the year 2006 • were analyzed. A one-year growth rate of two percent was applied to existing traffic volumes • to account for regional growth in the site vicinity. Also, an accounting was made of traffic • from two in-process developments in the site vicinity. • • Future daily, weekday a.m. and weekday p.m. peak hour site-generated trips were estimated for build-out of the site. • • A trip distribution pattern was derived through a review of existing traffic volumes and local • transportation facilities. • • Predicted site-generated traffic from the development was added to the background traffic • volumes to evaluate year 2006 total traffic operations at the study area intersections during • the weekday a.m. and weekday p.m. peak hours. • • An analysis of turn lane requirements and vehicle queuing was conducted. • • On-site circulation and safety for pedestrians and passenger cars was evaluated. • • Appropriate future mitigations were identified. • Planned Developments and Transportation Improvements • Based on conversations with staff from the City of Tigard and Washington County, the following two • in-process developments were identified: • • The remaining buildout of Bridgeport Village (SW Bridgeport Road/SW 72nd Avenue); and, • • Whole Foods (SW Bridgeport Road/SW Lower Boones Ferry Road). • According to staff, there are no planned transportation improvements in the vicinity of the site in the • immediate future that would significantly alter existing travel patterns. • 2006 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS • The background traffic analysis identifies how the study area's transportation system will operate when • the potential office park development is expected to open in the year 2006. This analysis includes traffic growth due to general growth in the region and traffic from the two identified in-process developments, • but does not include traffic from the potential development. r • Traffic Volumes Year 2006 background traffic volumes were developed by applying an annual growth rate of two • percent to existing traffic volumes to account for regional traffic growth. The background traffic volume • estimates also account for the increased traffic associated with the remaining build-out of Bridgeport • Village and the future construction of the Whole Foods business south of the site. Figures 6 and 7 • illustrate the resulting forecast year 2006 background traffic volumes: S r ;; Transportation Impact Analysis 19 • Kittelson & Associates, Inc. �_., Transportation Plenning/Tratfin Engineering • Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone • September 2005 fil ,i9 (NO LACS E) Ilt ,y LOS=B 1 Del=15.9 V/C=0.64 aoy� R • S cc¢ 3 . a • ii cn o o oT to z ��y�o .1 jL z tZ p FAG , m I- m 00��5 10� LOS=C e1 24 41-55 5 J Q-Q,� 5- V/C=0.69 c 455 T ¢ Q $ m • • .5� ''\ 1 ( moo In CD ,. r w �''xatv��a, ., SITE1 " ,; , S�0 one ri: •O RSA<O © css�~ y�y ,20 IC, ° o '* ' • . Los=B l m v• DeI=15.4 7jo0.......1I QO Z 1 V/C=0.70 • •E 1► CM=EBLT (TTT/ • 0 O. a • a Q •IL CM=EB ? •. •. LOS=A• N. 1DeI=<5.0• V/C=0.01.- • . �y y 3 v��0 y 0 '0 vil�� rlyo .• rs ct LOS=D cs `� DeI=41.8 . V/C=0.83 �p ,o s`► y yy e0p LOSEA 1j� R t ~ F�/p o �� a DeI=<5.0 o 03 16134, fps? CM=EB r )' CM=EB (----CWWBRTA yJ�V/C=0.01 c0 LOS=C DeI=15.7 �,g LOS=B ) DeI=15.4 ,V/C=0.01 . 0� LEGEND ♦ DeI=15.0 V/C=0.07 ` J V/C=0.05 i CM=CRITICAL MOVEMENT(UNSIGNALIZED) ay ir o1r eo 'o ' LOS=INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE 0,0 02 ry o (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL c-) OF SERVICE(UNSIGNALIZED) m Del=INTERSECTION AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT CONTROL I DELAY(UNSIGNALIZED) 2006 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FIGURE V/C=CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR c TIGARD, OREGON V KITTsSON ST , TRANSPORTELATION PUWNING&AS /TRAFOCIAFIC ESENGINEERININC.G Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone • • September 2005 i 's (NO SCALE) ss�~ Fe,$o �//a LOS=C iy • Del=23.5 • . . V/C=0.65 • 6y /I/ } O ..(61,..-*. �aS • n O z Q hiu,m 00��5 50—► Del 32.8 4--25 • Z J Q��,O 10 V/c=0.61 515 $ m � e '� 11' • N1n0 ▪ :e i;?7;',414'4.e.-4-SITEw 'gib •.E- • r6s.F� ,l,O . ' • • . . . y `a O e'• y© � l,° LOS=C m'43 o � Del=24.4 t; 9oS�a. P y Q ni 1 V/C=0.75 } • 0 �y6 O� R� CM=SB e LOS-D i D te . . , • •Del=34.2 , C 6y 'r s' o ei V/C=0.34 20 O/ ifl . •i'Os •o • •ccv c3 . CO ' N ' . • • co a . . • s (7 CM=EB LOS=C •n Del=18.7•a . • 1�viC�.o3• `y• 3oS 0.y 6�y o J/ /� N S gay ¢ LOS=E t Del=66.8 CM=EB LL 1 V/C=>1.0 rs y y gi0 LOS=C m �� `► F�yg"� (----;•-'■ � °'`� �[��` •�DeI=18.9 .-r / CM=WELT T e y' ,$ �\7° f ` CM=EB LOS=C V/C=0.03 m �s�s CM=EB LOS=C Del=20.2 �yy m LOS=A Del=18.6 V/C 0.02 c �' a LEGEND Del=<5.0 V/C=0.01 y V/C=0.05• CM=CRITICAL MOVEMENT(UNSIGNALIZED) cy y� ' n LOS=INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE �° yti s o (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL N OF SERVICE(UNSIGNALIZED) Del=INTERSECTION AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY 4i (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT CONTROL s DELAY(UNSIGNALIZED) 2006 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FIGURE �V/C=CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR 7 TIGARD,OREGON per KITTEN S , f. TRANSPORTATION LSO P&ASLANNING/TRAFFIC OCIATES ENGINEERININC.G • • • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road R•Rezone September 2005 • • Level-of-Service Analysis Using the weekday a.m. and weekday p.m. peak hour turning movement volumes shown in Figures 6 • and 7, an operational analysis was conducted at each study intersection to determine the 2006 • background traffic conditions. Figures 6 and 7 also present the analysis results for the weekday a.m. and • weekday p.m. peak hours, respectively. As shown, all but one of the study intersections are forecast to • operate acceptably during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Durham Road intersection will continue to function poorly at LOS E with a v/c ratio at or • greater than 1.0 during the weekday p.m. peak hour, but will operate acceptably during the weekday • a.m. peak hour.Appendix "E" contains the year 2006 background level-of-service worksheets. POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN • If the zone change is approved by the City of Tigard, OPUS Northwest could develop up to 127,000 • square feet of office park uses along the northwest side of SW Upper Boones Ferry Road,just north of • SW Durham Road. This development size represents a reasonable worst-case land use under the proposed zoning designation. Access to the site will be provided via one driveway located at the north • end of the site at the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW 72nd Avenue signalized intersection and one • driveway at the south end of the site onto SW Fanno Creek Place (private drive accessing SW Upper • Boones Ferry Road and shared with adjacent property owner, Elmo Studd's). In conjunction with the • potential site development, the remaining two existing site-access driveways onto SW Upper Boones Ferry Road will be closed, as will the single site-access driveway onto SW 74th Avenue in the northwest • corner of the site, which crosses the BNSF rail line. • TRIP GENERATION • Estimates of daily, weekday a.m. and weekday p.m. peak hour vehicle trip ends for an office park were • developed based on empirical observations at similar developments. These observations are summarized in the standard reference Trip Generation, 7th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation • Engineers (ITE) (Reference 3). • In accordance with ITE, an Office Park designation includes general office buildings and various • support services such as banks, restaurants, and service stations, arranged in a park- or campus-like • atmosphere. This use represents a reasonable worst-case land use for the proposed zoning designation. • By comparison, an outright general office building of similar size would generate approximately 190 weekday p.m. peak hour trips, or 70 trips less than the potential office park. • • • • • • • • • • • S S • '' Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Transportation Impact Analysis I 22 • 7ransportat on Ptanning/Tretfic Engineering • • • • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Rezone September 2005 • • Table 5 summarizes the estimated site trip generation during a typical weekday as well as during the • weekday a.m. and weekday p.m. peak hours (all trip ends shown in Table 5 have been rounded to the nearest five trips). • Table 5 • Estimated Site Trip Generation • Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak • ITE Size Daily Hour Trips Hour Trips Land Use Code (sq.ft.) Trips Total In Out Total In Out • Potential Development • Office Park 750 127,000 1,730 265 235 30 260 35 225 • Existing Land Uses • General Office Building(Retained)* 710 5,280 140 5 5 0 5 0 5 • General Office Building "tC? �"�, ,,'; � ( ) (20) (20) ( ) (10) ( ) g ��: ai ���1,,1��;�y� (450) (40) 20 20 (50) f0 40 (Removed)** �: AKSZ te.:, : • Net New Trips*** 1,420 230 220 10 215 25 190 • * The existing trips associated with the McDougall Company office building were retained. • ** The existing trips associated with the TruGreen Landcare buildings were removed and replaced by the trips • associated with the potential office park.. • *** Net New Trips were determined by subtracting the TruGreen Landcare trips from the sum of the total office trips and retained trips associated with the McDougall Company. • • As shown in Table 5 the office park could generate approximately 1,420 total net new daily trips of • which approximately 230 total net new trips could occur during the weekday a.m. peak hour and 215 net • new trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour. Trips associated with buildings removed as a result of the • development were subtracted from those remaining and proposed to determine the resulting net new trip • ends. • TRIP DISTRIBUTION • The distribution of site-generated trips onto the study area roadway system was estimated based on a • review of existing turning movement patterns observed from the traffic.counts conducted in the vicinity of the site and a review of the local transportation street network. The estimated trip distribution for all • study periods is illustrated in Figure 8. • Based on the estimated trip distribution pattern shown in Figure 8 and the trip generation shown in Table • 5, Figures 9 and 10 show the assignment of the site-generated traffic during the weekday a.m. and weekday p.m. peak hours, respectively. • • • • • • • • • 1- Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Transportation Impact Analysis ( 23 I. .' Transportation Planning/Traffic Engineering H:tpro/fiie17533-Opus NW Upper Baones Ferry Rezoneldwgslfigs17533FIGS.dwg Sep 22,2005-9:15am- ctiesler Layout Tab:FIG09 K1 O la fn lc"- c A m o r 1 0 O m zzz a o co oN SWUPP @ O� m to ER o O02 5 101440-0,6 co �, rso -,p 6-) ..P. 3AV H.1.4/..MS • 4>'a'' ' -.. �f+1+Ff I I I I I I I+H-++H-14 -i I i 1 11+1+4+ „a�� `'''hz``''''''''` "'"" BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RR f� �"s+ � .�rs's %91. \TO-t�' %- 3AV OWL MS 3AV GNU MS S� ("3 o/o O N X90 SVy SEQUO IA PKW�� 00 � 2 G ;4j 0. • U411 --__ ..... o Q T 0 CO a I- M J tjl Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone September 2005 / 1 (NO SCALE) co1 )' y5 t.5 VI'y i = a. • -- 0 : 0 • u' — W u' CO • Ln p ± 2 N Qy = T Z p � �(GQ` < _ 0 < m _z m X00 75 ± ¢ JQQ • I s;54p �Z;„ ri r: .. cz ci: 00, lk.4.:‘,41;,,,?,:,4 .,44-7 . . . . . . . . . . v � m . • • ' v' . R 4S --1 Z E �► IGQQ` D ,�c•T . . . . • • • • � < I'0 �G m . IR., o o • N W • 3 3 a •• y - n . • a PS L y ' •Ft m �1, is •2 �y cs ~ �yo� A� l AV ra ts a LEGEND 1 i CM=CRITICAL MOVEMENT(UNSIGNALIZED) ir �o ,..Q. o LOS=INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE �o (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE(UNSIGNALIZED) Del=INTERSECTION AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY • .o (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT CONTROL NET NEW SITE-GENERATED TRIPS FIGURE o- DELAY(UNSIGNALIZED) WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR V/C=CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO 9 ` TIGARD,OREGON J ■\\KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. ANCDl.RTATIl.N DI AMNINt_/TRAFFIf:FN(�INFFRINC-`. Opus Boones Fe Rezone September 2005 p s NW Upper Boo Ferry P e 0 (NO SCALE) s 1 �y • 2 *� ¢ y • • j LL1La a u) -t- W cn u • 1111 . .0 • F- m 0 m � ,OOH d o . it JQQ� • ••7- CD , �.. � �• :� DU, sue' , . O -`�A 0 oar y �`',O r.J •1 c I• A O N • 5 . • Q . Z • .� \:_e X �5 m .. o ~40 OO • N L . I a a . I 3 • Ft;,' .• . a . 3 s o 2 /5 . cc ' s "'O h 0.0 m 0 Os `• F� ` /F 1 0 5 /1 ). 1 m cii LEGEND le 1 z CM=CRITICAL MOVEMENT(UNSIGNALIZED) it ,°,1r 3 '. LOS=INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE 1 9 (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL en OF SERVICE(UNSIGNALIZED) m Del=INTERSECTION AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT CONTROL NET NEW SITE-GENERATED TRIPS FIGURE 1 g DELAY(UNSIGNALIZED) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR = V/C=CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO 1 O 1 TIGARD, OREGON J • KITTELSSAT , C TRANSPORTATIOON N PLANNING&AS /TRAFOCIFIC ESENGINEEINRIN.G • • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road one September 2005 • 2006 TOTAL TRAFFIC CONDITIONS • The total traffic conditions analysis forecasts how the study area's transportation system will operate • with the inclusion of traffic from the potential development. The 2006 background traffic volumes for • the weekday a.m. and weekday p.m. peak hours shown in Figures 6 and 7 were added to the site- generated generated traffic shown in Figures 9 and 10 to arrive at the total traffic volumes shown in Figures 11 and 12, respectively. • • Intersection Levels of Service • Figures 11 and 12 also provide a summary of year 2006 operating conditions at the study intersections assuming full build-out of the potential development. As indicated in the respective figures, with • proposed off-site transportation improvements in place, all of the study intersections are shown to • operate acceptably in accordance with the City of Tigard standards during the weekday a.m. and • weekday p.m. peak hours, with the exception of the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Durham Road intersection. This intersection is forecast to continue operating at LOS E and a v/c ratio at or over 1.0 • during the weekday p.m. peak hour. Appendix "F" contains the 2006 total traffic level-of-service • worksheets. • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Durham Road • Further analysis was performed to determine what improvements could be made at this intersection to • allow it to operate acceptably and meet the City's operational standard of LOS D and a v/c ratio of 0.95 • or less. Based on an understanding of the current traffic control, lane geometries, critical movements at • this intersection, and based a review of existing right-of-way maps, the following improvements have been identified: • • 1. Establish a second southbound through travel lane on SW Upper Boones Ferry Road, ending • with an appropriate transition back to one through travel lane south of the intersection. • 2. Maintain an exclusive right-turn lane on the southbound approach of SW Upper Boones Ferry • and install a right-turn overlap signal phase. • The above improvements are shown in a conceptual figure provided in Appendix "G" of this report. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Transportation Impact Analysis 27 • °�,'?v Transportation Planning/Tratfic Engineering 1 • Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone September 2005 e a '00, (NO SCALE) ssll\y X6„0 i ."3 LOS=B l Del=17.1 V/C=0.64 s ` 0C 7 • tt- Z Q . cu SII 1 ZO D ��5 10-...11 LOS=C 185 1 ffl 0 m 00 10-0 DeI=26.0 4-55 1 ¢ JQQ�Q,O 5 V/C=0.75 c 530 m 5� '�tl'•1 o'+n C a o �,{`� 3 . . . . . . . . . . C. 1 ski, � .SITT.`E }N-,•i .113 SRO 9 -l6'4 'o (::-‘5,6‘...4„. �'y6o e. / Ck � LOS=B l 0 -4Del=15.8 C < S� °i V/C=0.19 SO O • O o N • a • 3 a • vi 1 2 ' r\ i • h / _ ?9�SaS vy0 . •y • ' N r LOS=D ' Del=44.5 V/C=0.86 70. LOS=C Del=15.8 1 m LOS=C Del=15.8 V/C=0.01 } j LEGEND ♦ De1=15.6 V/C=0.02 ` Kir V/C=0.05 t z CM=CRITICAL MOVEMENT(UNSIGNALIZED) o� `,° �c '0 c LOS=INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE m 0 (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE(UNSIGNALIZED) m Del=INTERSECTION AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY 'o (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT CONTROL s DELAY(UNSIGNALIZED) 2006 TOTAL TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FIGURE V/C=CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR 11 TIGARD, OREGON J KITTELSON& SCI ,INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AS /OTRAFFIC ATES ENGINEERING Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone f September 2005 e— 9 9's (NO SCALE) LOS=C l(3 Del=24.1 O� 10 V/C=0.66 2.'3 �\oas R -7' O Z g t cY to o Lo co co A o Z C ' ��y�° � 1 L 2 2 0 • D rt 2 D �5 10-p LOS=C -60 m — C~, m o0� 50—► Del=33.7 F 25 _ J 4°Q,O • 10 RV/C==0.84 or 525 CO y� 1 (••rte:L_. .-c•,rn n7�'.I4 '":FFF'"�'g f.•T A !SITEw- ~ OU9yq c-� P`/ . MRD ���A�o o os y y 0h cci v /� 1 �° ° LOS=C l m n' Del=25.8 ✓ 9ps�.>I ` q•� Z ' • V/C=0.75 CM=SB i • • c1/4 • 0 • , cT° LOS=E ��Q < 6° 'i t\���6p Del=36.8 i A �5 m �'p V/C=0.36 2p C °° r2ys 0 N CO N• CD a U) a . . • CD • Lei CC • • m TA. • • -c, u3.*. ,_.,ok.oC LOS=E DDel=7o.5 1 V/C=>1.0 rs s ° 96° $ g ii ` ib 1 /l CM WBL � M �O ♦� v� CM= / CM=EB LOS=C LOS=A LOS=C s cs Del=23.6 VD/C 0.02 LEGEND Del=0.0 v/c=0.01 1 V/C=0.27 le z CM=CRITICAL MOVEMENT(UNSIGNALIZED) ,(.3 le ,`'y� 6 ‹, h °s • LOS=INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE qP` 62 s (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE(UNSIGNALIZED) Lo . Del=INTERSECTION AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY • (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT CONTROL _9- DELAY(UNSIGNALIZED) 2006 TOTAL TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FIGURE //C=CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR 12 , `K TIGARD, OREGON KITTELSON& ST ,INC. TRANSPORTATION PL AS .NNING/OCIA TRAFFIC ES ENGINEERING • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road one • September 2005 • Mitigation analysis results show that with the identified intersection improvements in place, the • intersection of SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and SW Durham Road will function adequately at a LOS • D and with a v/c ratio of 0.89 during the weekday p.m. peak hour. • • It should be emphasized that the capacity enhancements identified for the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Durham Road intersection cannot be completely built within the available right-of-way. • Additional right-of-way would be needed from adjacent landowners along the northwest side of SW • Upper Boones Ferry Road, including landowners south of the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW • Durham Road intersection. OPUS Northwest has approached Elmo Studd's about dedicating additional • right-of-way, who has indicated that they are not interested in doing so at this time. OPUS Northwest is not in a position to implement any solution outside of their own frontage improvements and right-of- • way dedication without considerable cooperation from multiple landowners, and due to this situation, • such enhancements are not likely to be a feasible mitigation measure for OPUS Northwest without • assistance from the City of Tigard. The City of Tigard may choose to defer the identified intersection improvements until such time that adequate right-of-way can be acquired and sufficient funds are set • aside for construction. This scenario would likely occur only if the Elmo Studd's property were to • redevelop in the future, unless the City should choose to make an improvement sooner, either with City • funds or with the County's MSTIP funds. • It is important to note that the potential office park development will generate upwards of $372,000 in • traffic impact fees. The City could potentially earmark these fees towards future capacity improvements at this intersection. Additionally, preliminary figures show that the cost associated with identified • improvements will be around $585,000 (not including utilities and right-of-way costs). This means the TIF collected for the potential office park development could fund approximately 64 percent of the • project cost. Considering that traffic generated by the potential office park development represents • approximately 2.5 percent of the total traffic forecasted to travel through this intersection, the TIF • contribution towards the future improvements at this intersection far exceeds the site-generated impacts. OPUS Northwest requests that the City of Tigard earmark TIF monies toward this improvement. • • Queuing Analysis • A vehicle queuing analysis was conducted under forecast year 2006 total traffic conditions to determine the vehicle storage requirements for key intersections in the study area. In the analysis, a Poisson • distribution was applied at a 95th-percentile confidence interval to determine vehicle queue length • probabilities. In other words, vehicles were assumed to arrive randomly and the queues reported will not be exceeded for more than five percent of the peak hour. The assumed length-of-red interval for • signalized intersections was taken from the signal timing parameters used in the LOS calculations. For unsignalized intersections, the vehicle queuing analysis assumes random arrivals. Estimates of 95th- • percentile vehicle queues are based on equation 17-37 from the Highway Capacity Manual (Reference • 2) and one vehicle was assumed to occupy 25 feet for this analysis. Table 6 summarizes the results of • the intersection queuing analysis. Appendix "H" contains the queuing analysis worksheets. • As shown in Table 6, the queuing analysis determined that without any off-site transportation • improvements in place, sufficient lane storage will exist at all but one of the study intersections. At the • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Durham Road intersection, vehicle queues are forecast to exceed existing storage for the southbound through and right-turn movements on SW Upper Boones Ferry • Road, and the northbound left-turn movement. Additionally, the forecast queue lengths on the • southbound approach to this intersection will extend up to or beyond the location of the proposed • southern site-access driveway. • • Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Transportation Impact Analysis I 30 j,:` Transportation Planning/Traffic Engineering e • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Rite • September 2005 • Table 6 • 95"'-Percentile Vehicle Queuing Summary • (Year 2006 Total Traffic Conditions) • Movement Weekday Weekday Available Adequate & AM Peak PM Peak Storage Storage • I Intersection Approach, Hour(ft) Hour(ft) (ft) Available? • NB LT 25 25 751 Yes • NB TH/RT 300 375 Cont. Yes • SB LT 150 200 751 Yes SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd. • at SW 72nd Ave(South)/Site SB TH/RT 175 350 Cont. Yes Driveway • EB 25 150 Cont Yes • WB LT/TH 75 50 100 Yes • WB RT 125 250 Cont. Yes • SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd NB LT 25 25 251 Yes • at SW Fanno Creek PI/Site Driveway EB 25 25 Cont. Yes • NB LT 200 325 175 No 2 • NB TH/RT 325 275 Cont. Yes • SB LT 100 75 501 Yes • SB TH 200 450 Cont.3 Yes • SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd SB RT 275 325 275° No • at SW Durham Rd EB LT 400 350 425 5 Yes • EB TH 300 275 Cont. Yes • EB RT 175 250 250 Yes • WB LT 25 50 50 Yes • WB TH/RT 275 450 Cont. Yes • Cont. = Continuous travel lane. • 1 Additional storage available in continuous center two-way left turn lane • 2 Potential development will not add any additional traffic to this movement. • 3 Vehicle queue will block proposed southern site-driveway. • °Striped storage length for this movement is 110 feet. However, the effective storage length available for • this movement is 275 feet. • 5 Available storage includes the additional striped storage west of the railroad and SW 74th Avenue. • A supplemental vehicle queuing analysis was prepared for the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW • Durham Road intersection assuming the identified capacity enhancements are in place. The results • show that with a second southbound through lane and a right-turn lane with overlap signal phase, • sufficient lane storage will exist on the southbound approach (through and right-turn lanes), such that • vehicle queues would not back up past the proposed southern site-access driveway. The results of the analysis are provided in Table 7, with detailed queuing worksheets also provided in Appendix "H". • • • • i ," Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Transportation Impact Analysis � 31 Transportation pianning/Tratflc Engineering • • SW Upper Boones Feny Road Ate • September 2005 • Table 7 • 95"'-Percentile Vehicle Queuing Summary • (Year 2006 Total Traffic Conditions- Mitigated Scenario) • NB LT 175 325 175 No' • NB TH/RT 325 300 Cont. Yes • SB LT 100 75 50' Yes • SB TH 125 250 Cont. Yes • SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd SB RT 200 300 300 Yes • at SW Durham Rd EB LT 400 300 425 2 Yes 1 • EB TH 275 275 Cont. Yes • EB RT 175 275 250 Yes • WB LT 25 50 50 Yes • WB TH/RT 275 475 Cont. Yes Cont. = Continuous travel lane. • 1 Potential development will not add any additional traffic to this movement. • 2 Available storage includes the additional striped storage west of the railroad and SW 74th Avenue. • • ON-SITE CIRCULATION AND ACCESS • As part of this study, a review was conducted of the conceptual site plan shown in Figure 2 to ensure • that the site will provide sufficient on-site circulation and access for pedestrians and vehicular • movements. • Circulation • Kittelson & Associates, Inc. worked with the project's development team to enhance the operational and • safety aspects of the internal parking lot layout, the external site-access driveway locations, and • pedestrian access throughout the site. Through this analysis, the conceptual site plan was refined to meet the needs of both pedestrian and vehicular traffic. • • Access • It is important to address how the access scheme for the proposed two external site-access driveways along SW Upper Boones Ferry Road complies or does not comply with the access management • standards enforced by the City of Tigard. The City of Tigard Development Code Section 18.705.030(H) • establishes a driveway spacing standard of 600 feet between driveways on Arterial roadways such as • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road. Based on the conceptual site plan shown in Figure 2, the City's • driveway spacing standard does not necessarily apply to the proposed retention of the north site-access driveway because the driveway intersects SW Upper Boones Ferry Road directly across from an • intersecting public street. Retaining the north site-access driveway will not create any new access. • The proposal to retain the existing southern site-access driveway at the present Fanno Creek Place access does not meet the City's driveway spacing standard of 600 feet. However, as a shared access • with the adjacent property owner to the south (Elmo Studd's) it does meet the intent of Section • 18.705.030(C) in Tigard's Development Code, which encourages joint access control. Additionally, the • proposed access scheme for SW Upper Boones Ferry Road will result in the removal of two other • existing site driveways. The proposed consolidation of these other site access points along SW Upper Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Transportation Impact Analysis I 32 • L., v Transportation Plenningfiratfic Engineering • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Rine • September 2005 • Boones Ferry Road demonstrates that the development will result in more conforming driveway spacing • than the existing situation. OPUS Northwest is proposing to locate their driveway in an optimum • location considering the probable future redevelopment of the Elmo Studd's property. A potential future • shared-access easement to the driveway has been discussed with Elmo Studd's representatives, who • have indicated that they are not opposed to the driveway location. Lastly, Section 18.705.030(J) of Tigard's Development Code states that developments in excess of 100 parking spaces (which the • potential development will have) shall have up to two site driveways. • 41/ Although the access spacing standard of 600 feet will not be satisfied at the southern site driveway to SW Durham Road, the current proposal represents the best alternative for the overall site, the adjacent • property owner to the south, and the adjacent intersections. Without this secondary access, all site traffic • would access the site at the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road intersections, resulting in a degradation of the • traffic signal operations and associated traffic flow along the main street. Furthermore, as shown in the • queuing analysis, the proposed driveway does not conflict with adjacent access points. For these reasons, an access spacing deviation is acceptable at this location. • • SIGHT DISTANCE • Intersection sight distance was observed in the field at all study intersections. None of the study intersections observed in the field exhibited any sight distance deficiencies. Landscaping along the site • frontage should be maintained to provide adequate site distance at the site driveways. • • • • • • • • • • S S • • • S S S S S • • Kittelson & Associates, inc. Transportation Impact Analysis � 33 _,� Transportation Plenningfl,tfic Engineering lA 'D C 0 c� o E N -`75 m cE 00 08 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Aline • September 2005 • • • Conclusions and Recommendations Based on the results of the traffic impact analysis, the potential office park can be developed while • maintaining acceptable levels of service and safety on the surrounding transportation system. The • analysis developed the following findings and recommendations: • FINDINGS • • Existing Conditions • • During the weekday a.m. and weekday p.m. peak hours, all study area intersections currently • operate within performance standards deemed acceptable by the City of Tigard with the exception of the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Durham Road intersection. This • intersection is currently operating at LOS E and near capacity during the weekday p.m. peak • hour,but operates acceptably during the weekday a.m. peak hour. • Year 2006 Background Conditions • • Operational analysis of year 2006 background traffic conditions indicates that all of the study • intersections are forecast to operate acceptably during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours, • with the exception of the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Durham Road intersection. This intersection is forecast to operate at LOS E with a volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio over • 1.0 during the weekday p.m. peak hour, but function acceptably during the weekday a.m. • peak hour period. • Potential Development Activities • • The potential office park development will consist of up to 127,000 square-feet of office park • space. • • The site is expected to generate approximately 1,420 total net new daily trips, with • approximately 230 total net new trips occurring during the weekday a.m. peak hour, and 215 • total net new trips occurring during the weekday p.m. peak hour. This estimate reflects the amount of net new trips that will be generated by the potential office park in addition to what • is already being generated by the two existing businesses on site. • Year 2006 Total Traffic Conditions: • • With the potential development, all of the intersections are forecast to operate in a similar manner to that described under the background conditions. The SW Upper Boones Ferry • Road/SW Durham Road intersection is forecast to continue operating at LOS E with a v/c • ratio over 1.0 during the weekday p.m. peak hour, but function adequately during the • weekday a.m. peak hour. All other intersections and access points will function acceptably. • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Durham Road Intersection • o Additional operational analysis indicates this intersection will function adequately at a LOS D and with a v/c ratio of 0.89 during the weekday p.m. peak hour, with the • following improvements in place: • • Establishment of a second southbound through travel lane on SW Upper • Boones Ferry Road, ending with an appropriate transition back to one through • travel lane south of the intersection. Kittelson & Associates, inc. Conclusions and Recommendations I 35 • _,, �� Transportation Planning/Traffic Engineering • • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Rine • September 2005 • • Maintaining an exclusive right-turn lane on the southbound approach of SW • Upper Boones Ferry and installing a right-turn overlap signal phase. • o Because insufficient right-of-way exists to construct the capacity enhancements • identified for the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Durham Road intersection, OPUS Northwest requests that the City earmark the estimated $372,000 in traffic • impact fees (TIF) associated with the potential office park development towards a future capacity enhancement project at this intersection. With a preliminary cost • estimate of $585,000 for improving the intersection (not including utilities and right- of-way costs), the potential development has the ability to fund upwards of 64 percent • of the estimated improvement cost. • o Site traffic generated will represent approximately 2.5 percent of the total traffic forecasted to travel through this intersection. Based on this finding, the TIF • contribution towards the future intersection improvement far exceeds the site- generated impacts at this intersection (64 percent TIF contribution versus 2.5 percent traffic impact). • A queuing analysis determined that with recommended future off-site transportation • improvements in place, sufficient lane storage will exist at the study intersections in the • immediate site vicinity on SW Upper Boones Ferry Road, including the SW Upper Boones • Ferry Road/SW Durham Road intersection. RECOMMENDATIONS • • To improve access spacing and minimize access points along SW Upper Boones Ferry Road, • the two existing driveways located between the north and south driveways should be closed • in conjunction with development of the site. The single driveway accessing SW 74th Avenue across the BNSF rail line from the TruGreen Landscape property should also be closed. • • OPUS Northwest requests that the City of Tigard earmark the estimated Traffic Impact Fee • of $372,000 that would be paid by the potential office park development towards a future • capacity enhancement project at the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Durham Road intersection. The future project should add another southbound travel lane on SW Upper • Boones Ferry Road, continuing through the intersection, with an appropriate design length and taper to merge southbound traffic back into one travel lane. Additionally, an exclusive • southbound right-turn lane should be maintained with an added right-turn overlap signal • phase. • • Landscaping along the site frontage of SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and SW Fanno Creek • Place should be maintained to ensure adequate sight distance at all site-access driveways. S S S • S S • '" Kitteison &Associates, Inc. Conclusions and Recommendations I 36 • :> + Tranaponation Planning/Traffic Engineering • • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road none • September 2005 • • References • 1. Tri-Met. http://www.trimet.org. September 1, 2005. 2. Transportation Research Board. Highway Capacity Manual. 2000. • 3. Institute of Transportation Engineers. ITE Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition. 2003. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Kittelson &Associates, Inc. References 38 ,_, .l Transportation Planning/Traffic Engineering • • INTERSECTION: SW 72nd Ave(North)- er Boones Ferry Rd- START TIME: 7:00 AM • PROJECT IDS: 7533 END TIME: 9:00 AM • - OC JOB 8: 10106803 DATE: 8/4/2005 • PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS PEAK HOUR LINK VOLUMES • - • o (EIhuI t °m � ,.„ tb'[a6 SW tsotn Avenue,ale.105 • I n Tigard,OR 97224 I 1 • � � � = v Phone:503-620-4242 Fax:503 620-4545 8 -t t- 179 4- 72 4- 675 email:)rw @qualityeounts.net • PHF TOTAL www.qualitycounts.net • 11 -+ 0.95 r 55 HV=13% 1933 HV=7% PEAK HOUR PED • 4 -1 j- 441 23 -0- 739 CROSSING VOLUMES • 1 t r e t 0 WAN . E N n § 1 i�.�i 7 ♦••.+ice.__ S ;.iO:i:...�'O.iii • 0 ••••••••••••. .•i :.V: 4 • ice! • INTERSECTION: SW Upper Boones Ferry W 72nd Ave(south)- START TIME: 7:00 AM • • PROJECT ID#: 7533 4) END TIME: 9:00 AM a . • OC JOB#: 10106804 DATE: 8/4/2005 • PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS PEAK HOUR LINK VOLUMES ■ w 9 (KINN14 • • N r w 1 16Ytib SW 8Dm Avenue,Ste.105 • . I I u ae o Tigard,OR 97224 I 1 = m Phone: • .1 1 �' Fax:503 620-0545 O L 83 . 5 89 email:)rw®qualitycounts.net • PHF T OTAL www.qualitycounts.net O — 0.97 4— 1 HV=0% 7458 HV=19% • PEAK HOUR PED • 0 " ♦ r 5 0 --4. 126 -► CROSSING VOLUMES 0 • -� I r m t ° a • N n t` !.�i'Oi = i�.i�i�:i.i i�i�i.i • !iO*iVi..i VV...., . �.ii 4i • +: i PEAK HOUR: 7:15 AM PEAK 15 MINUTES: 7:45 AM !4 TO TO • 8:15 AM .,. _8:00 AM 0 • 5-MINUTE COUNT SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd- SW 72nd Ave(south)- sw upper Boones Ferry Rd- Driveway- Crosswalk Usage TOTAL PERIOD (Southbound) (Westbound) (Northbound) (Eastbound) (Peds By Approach) • BEGINNING AT Right Thru Lett Right Thru Left _ Right Thru Left Right Thru Left North East South West Veh Peds 4 • 7:00 AM 0 27 7 9 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 0 7:05 AM 0 24 4 4 0 0 2 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 0 • 7:10 AM 0 23 5 6 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 88 1 7:15 AM 0 36 7 3 0 0 1 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 0 III 7:20 AM 0 48 6 9 0 1 1 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 134 0 7:25 AM 0 28 11 14 1 1 2 65 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123 0 • 7:30 AM 0 38 12 4 0 0 1 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 115 0 7:35 AM 0 42 9 10 0 0 1 58 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 121 0 • 7:40 AM 0 43 6 5 0 1 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 128 0 7:45 AM 0 31 10 6 0 0 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 125 0 • 7:50 AM 0 38 14 6 0 0 2 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 133 0 7:55 AM 1 35 12 7 0 0 2 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 119 0 • 8:00 AM 1 51 9 4 0 2 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 134 0 8:05 AM 0 35 2 8 0 0 2 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 • 8:10 AM 0 37 15 7 0 0 1 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 0 8:15 AM 0 33 2 9 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 0 • 8:20 AM 0 41 7 6 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 0 825 AM 0 44 8 4 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 115 0 • 8:30 AM 0 43 5 6 0 0 1 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 115 0 8:35 AM 0 36 2 6 0 1 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 99 1 • 8:40 AM 0 29 4 5 1 1 1 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 0 8:45 AM 0 40 10 11 0 1 1 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 105 0 • 8:50 AM 0 36. 9 3 0 1 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 105 0 8:55 AM 0 31 6 5 0 1. 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 0 • • • • • • Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians By Approach TOTAL HOURLY TOTALS • Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett Right Thru Lett Right Thru Lett North East South West Veh 'Peds 7:00 AM 1 413 103 83 1 3 12 754 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1372 1 • 7:15 AM 2 462 113 83 1 5 13 777 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1458 0 7:30 AM 2 468 106 76 0 3 9 745 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1410 0 • 7:45 AM 2 453 90 74 1 4 9 716 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1349 1 8:00 AM 1 456 79 74 1 7 6 656 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1280 1 • • • - Version 3.1 • • INTERSECTION: SW 74th Ave-/SW Durh - START TIME: 7:00 AM • • PROJECT ID#: 7533 END TIME: 9:00 AM OC JOB#: 10106805 DATE: 8/4/2005 ai: ' PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS PEAK HOUR LINK VOLUMES • • - II H1I�►r • o N "' t 16285 sW 65tn Avenue,Ste.105 0 I n I Tigard,OR 97224 I I 1 = m Phone:503-620-4242 .1 1 L. • Fax:503 620-4545 19 L 49 515 4-- 553 email:Irw®qualitycounts.net • PHF TOTAL www.qualitycounts.net 1172 —+ 0.96 4- 504 HV=3% 1765 HV=5% • PEAK HOUR PED 0 —4. r 0 1191—. 1182-. CROSSING VOLUMES • '1 t r C t 1 F• ,.,�•. ..... 0 0 0 1 I. ° ::❖:: ..v:ii 4•iiiii • ............0 t t........................:t 0 .......... n.:.x.: • PEAK HOUR: 7:15 AM PEAK 15 MINUTES: 7:45 AM .:.e: TO TO • 8:15 AM 8:00 AM 0 • 5-MINUTE COUNT SW 74th Ave- SW Durham Rd- WA- SW Durham Rd- Crosswalk Usage TOTAL PERIOD (Southbound) (Westbound) (Northbound) _ (Peds By Approach) • BEGINNING AT Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett North East South West Veh Peds 7:00 AM 1 0 0 3 37 0 0 0 0 . 0 79 4 0 0 0 0 124 0 • 7:05 AM 3 0 0 1 32 0 0 0 0 0 81 4 0 0 0 0 121 0 7:10 AM 0 0 1 3 28 0 0 0 0 0 94 2 0 0 0 0 128 0 1110 7:15 AM 1 0 2 3 37 0 0 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 133 0 7:20 AM 1 0 1 4 37 0 0 0 0 0 107 4 0 0 0 0 154 0 • 7:25 AM 1 0 0 5 40 0 0 0 0 0 103 1 0 0 0 0 150 0 7:30 AM 0 0 2 3 46 0 0 0 0 0 86 0 0 0 0 0 137 0 • 7:35 AM 2 0 2 5 35 0 0 0 0 0 86 0 0 0 0 0 130 0 7:40 AM 1 0 0 6 41 0 0 0 0 0 106 1 0 0 0 0 155 0 • 7:45 AM 1 0 1 2 34 0 0 0 0 0 113 2 0 0 0 0 153 0 7:50 AM 0 0 0 4 46 0 0 0 0 0 109 1 0 0 0 0 160 0 • 7:55 AM 3 0 0 3 42 0 0 0 0 0 95 4 0 0 0 0 147 0 8:00 AM 0 0 2 2 55 0 0 0 0 0 95 2 1 0 0 0 156 1 • 8:05 AM 1 0 0 6 48 0 0 0 0 0 93 2 0 0 0 0 150 0 8:10 AM 0 0 0 6 43 0 0 0 0 0 89 2 0 0 0 0 140 0 • 8:15 AM 2 0 2 4 48 0 0 0 0 0 64 4 1 0 0 0 124 1 • 8:20 AM 0 0 1 4 46 0 0 0 0 0 75 4 0 0 0 0 130 0 8:25 AM 0 0 2 6 43 0 0 0 0 0 78 4 0 0 0 0 133 0 • 8:30 AM 1 0 3 2 37 0 0 0 0 0 83 4 0 0 0 0 130 0 8:35 AM 1 0 1 3 39 0 0 0 0 0 92 2 0 0 0 0 138 0 6:40 AM 0 0 2 1 31 0 0 0 0 0 74 2 0 0 0 0 110 0 8:45 AM 2 0 2 3 51 0 0 0 0 0 86 0 0 0 0 0 144 0 8:50 AM 0 0 1 6 41 0 0 0 0 0 76 2 0 0 0 0 126 0 8:55 AM 1 0 1 2 34 0 0 0 0 0 86 1 0 0 0 0 125 0 • • . • • • • • HOURLY TOTALS Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians By Approach TOTAL Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left North East South West Veh Peds • 7:00 AM 14 0 9 42 455 0 0 0 0 0 1149 23 0 0 0 0 1692 0 7:15 AM 11 0 10 49 504 0 0 0 0 0 1172 19 1 0 0 0 1765 1 • 7:30 AM 10 0 12 51 527 0 0 0 0 0 1089 26 2 0 0 0 1715 2 7:45 AM 9 0 14 43 512 0 0 0 0 0 1060 33 2 0 0 0 1671 2 • 6:00 AM 8 0 17 45 516 0 0 0 0 0 991 29 2 0 0 0 1606 2 • • • Version 3.1 • • INTERSECTION: SW Upper Boones Ferry W Durham Rd- START TIME: 7:00 AM • • PROJECT IV: 7533 END TIME: 9:00 AM a OC JOB 4: 10106806 DATE: 8/4/2005 • PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS PEAK HOUR LINK VOLUMES I • III WHOM MM►ae • e ,r"p o v ° t 1tratA SW tsbtn Avenue,ste.105 • I 4 a . I Tigard,OR 97224 I I 4 = P. Phone:503-620-4242 ..1 1 � Fax:503 620-4545 471 L 20 4- 559 •— 206 email:)rw @qualitycounts.net • • PHF TOTAL www.qualitycounts.net 463 -4. 0.90 .— 181 HV.2% 2245 HV.7% • PEAK HOUR PED 229 —4 r 5 1163-+ 515 -. CROSSING VOLUMES • '1 t r t 0 • 4- < N ...: --1 1110 .- N fo ! 0 O .�••O� 11110 •••••••••••• 1 �i.i.i.i�i.i.i.i.i i.i.i 0 •"�i iii•�•�i�i i PEAK HOUR: 7:15 AM PEAK 15 MINUTES: 7:45 AM ;� •�ti • TO TO • 8:15 AM 8:00 AM 2 • 5-MINUTE COUNT SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd- SW Durham Rd- sW Upper Boones Ferry Rd- SW Durham Rd- Crosswalk Usage TOTAL PERIOD (Southbound) (Westbound) (Northbound) (Eastbound) (Peds By Approach) • BEGINNING AT Right Thru Lett Right Thru Lett Right Thru Lett Right Thru Lett North East South West Veh Peds 7:00 AM 16 8 0 1 13 0 4 10 8 18 17 48 0 0 1 0 143 1 • 7:05 AM 11 11 5 2 13 0 1 29 9 12 31 32 0 0 0 0 156 0 7:10 AM 10 8 0 1 13 0 0 14 7 22 43 38 0 0 0 0 156 0 41111 7:15 AM 27 7 3 0 11 0 0 21 9 11 40 44 0 0 0 0 173 0 7:20 AM 30 9 3 3 11 0 1 18 6 17 44 38 0 0 0 0 180 0 • 7:25 AM 15 12 6 1 11 0 1 29 16 14 31 44 0 0 0 0 180 0 7:30 AM 18 15 6 2 16 0 0 20 13 13 42 40 0 0 0 0 185 0 •- 7:35 AM 17 18 5 0 15 0 0 29 10 12 31 39 0 0 0 0 176 0 7:40 AM 20 5 7 1 14 0 0 25 16 19 44 37 0 0 1 1 188 2 • 7:45 AM 17 23 2 0 11 0 0 39 10 22 44 43 0 0 0 0 211 0 7:50 AM 20 9 1 1 14 0 1 34 16 25 49 46 0 0 0 0 216 0 • 7:55 AM 15 17 6 2 20 3 0 28 6 25 44 33 0 0 0 0 199 0 8:00 AM 29 15 6 6 20 1 0 14 13 19 32 27 0 0 0 0 182 0 • 8:05 AM 18 10 1 4 19 0 0 19 9 23 32 46 0 0 1 0 181 1 8:10 AM 21 12 3 0 19 1 0 18 7 29 30 34 0 0 0 0 174 0 • 8:15 AM 20 12 4 3 23 3 1 20 13 15 28 17 1 0 0 0 159 1 8:20 AM 19 16 1 6 15 0 3 23 10 17 30 35 0 0 0 0 175 • 0 • 8:25 AM 25 14 2 3 18 0 2 27 8 15 31 32 0 0 0 0 177 0 • 8:30 AM 17 22 2 2 11 1 2 26 10 20 45 27 0 1 0 0 185 1 8:35 AM 17 16 2 2 17 1 0 17 8 18 18 35 0 1 0 0 151 1 • 6:40 AM 7 15 4 1 12 0 0 17 5 22 27 35 0 0 0 0 145 0 8:45 AM 22 12 1 1 16 0 0 21 16 24 33 30 0 0 0 0 176 0 • 8:50 AM 19 9 3 0 13 0 0 18 16 25 28 36 0 0 0 0 167 0 8:55 AM 13 4 3 0 14 0 0 13 . 7 16 28 42 0 0 0 0 140 0 • • • • • • • HOURLY TOTALS Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians By Approach TOTAL Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett North East South West Veh Peds 7:00 AM 216 142 44 14 162 3 8 296 126 210 460 482 0 0 2 1 2163 3 7:15 AM 247 152 49 20 181 5 3 294 131 229 463 471 0 0 2 1 2245 3 • 7:30 AM 239 166 44 28 204 8 7 296 131 234 437 429 1 0 2 1 2223 4 7:45 AM 225 181 34 30 199 10 9 282 115 250 410 410 1 2 1 0 2155 4 • 8:00 AM 227 157 32 28 197 7 8 233 122 243 362 396 1 2 1 0 2012 4 • • • Version 3.1 • , • • INTERSECTION: SW Sequioa Pkwy/SW bones Ferry Rd- START TIME: 7:00 AM PROJECT 108: 7533 END TIME: 9:00 AM j a • GC JOB#: 10106807 DATE: 8/42005 PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS PEAK HOUR LINK VOLUMES • a y 11S1Uh1 I IIIN 1- NN F, e t 18285 SW awn Avenue,Ste.105 • N I n N Tigard,OR 97224 I I s 1 A Phone:503-620-4242 • + ~ • Fax:503 620-4545 BO L 626 4- 712 4-1278 email:jrw @qualitycounts.net • PHF TOTAL www.qualitycounts.net • 638 -i 0.98 4-- 635 HV=9% 2296 HV=4% PEAK HOUR PED • 13 ♦ F 17 731 ♦ 835 -+ CROSSING VOLUMES • I I • ---1 . ,„ L n F i .. ,..2 r ::::::::::. .,:.:.:.:.: Z •i..�i i i•;•ii 411 2 • i. ••O.O ...•••.••.•• 0 ■....•••••••• • PEAK HOUR: 7:15 AM PEAK 15 MINUTES: 7:45 AM :S: TO TO • 8:15 AM 8:00 AM 0 5-MINUTE COUNT SW Sequloa Pkwy- swupper Boones Ferry Rd- Driveway- SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd- Crosswalk Usage TOTAL PERIOD (Southbound) (Westbound) (Northbound) (Eastbound) (Peds By Approach) • BEGINNING AT Right Thru Lett Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett Right Thru Lett North East South West Veh Peds • 7:00 AM 3 1 10 40 37 3 0 0 0 0 39 6 0 0 0 0 139 0 7:05 AM 3 0 17 44 39 1 0 0 0 0 53 5 0 0 1 0 162 1 • 7:10 AM 2 0 16 30 34 1 2 0 0 1 51 3 0 0 1 0 140 1 7:15 AM 4 0 17 42 57 0 0 0 1 0 52 5 0 0 0 0 176 0 411 7:20 AM 4 0 12 53 63 2 0 0 0 3 55 8 0 0 0 0 200 0 7:25 AM 2 0 16 57 59 0 2 0 1 0 60 3 0 0 0 0 200 0 • 7:30 AM 7 0 15 48 53 1 0 0 0 1 45 5 0 0 0 0 175 0 7:35 AM 7 1 15 45 55 2 0 0 0 0 49 1 0 0 0 0 175 0 • 7:40 AM 6 0 14 56 50 0 1 1 2 4 57 7 1 0 0 0 198 1 7:45 AM 6 0 10 52 47 0 2 1 1 0 58 5 0 0 0 1 182 1 • 7:50 AM 9 1 15 65 57 1 0 1 0 0 42 13 0 0 0 0 204 0 7:55 AM 5 2 18 54 54 5 0 1 0 1 54 6 0 0 0 0 200 0 • 8:00 AM 8 1 22 56 53 3 0 2 0 2 58 4 0 0 0 1 209 1 8:05 AM 7 2 17 . 46 41 2 0 0 0 1 62 11 0 0 0 0 189 0 • 8:10 AM 7 0 21 52 46 1 0 0 0 1 46 12 0 0 0 0 186 0 8:15 AM 5 1 11 31 45 2 1 0 1 3 40 6 1 0 0 0 146 1 • 8:20 AM 3 0 16 44 35 2 2 0 2 2 51 5 0 0 0 0 162 0 8:25 AM 5 0 16 26 38 2 2 0 1 1 46 7 0 0 0 0 144 0 • 8:30 AM 4 1 15 53 31 3 2 1 1 0 48 4 0 0 0 0 163 0 8:35 AM 6 0 24 43 39 0 1 0 0 0 66 3 0 0 1 0 182 1 • 8:40 AM 5 0 20 47 34 2 0 1 1 0 53 5 0 0 0 0 168 0 8:45 AM 3 1 16 50 52 3 2 0 0 1 43 6 0 0 0 0 177 0 411 8:50 AM 4 0 21 40 43 2 3 0 0 1 46 8 0 0 0 0 168 0 8:55 AM 3 0 25 39 33 2 1 0 1 1 58 5 0 0 0 0 16B 0 • • • • • Southbound Westbound . Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians By Approach TOTAL HOURLY TOTALS • Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett Right Thru Lett Right Thru Lett North East South West Veh Peds 7:00 AM 58 5 175 586 605 16 7 4 5 10 615 67 1 0 2 1 2153 4 • 7:15 AM 72 7 192 626 635 17 5 6 5 13 638 BO 1 0 0 2 2296 3 7:30 AM 75 8 190 575 574 21 8 6 7 16 608 82 2 0 0 2 2170 4 • 7:45 AM 70 8 205 569 520 23 10 7 7 11 624 81 1 0 1 2 2135 4 8:00 AM 60 6 224 527 490 24 14 4 7 13 617 76 1 0 1 1 2062 3 • • • Version 3.1 • - —___,.... • • INTERSECTION: Boones Ferry-/N/A- START TIME: 7:00 AM ,40, PROJECT ID4: 7533 END TIME: 9:00 AM - • OC JOB is 10108502 DATE: 8/112005 • PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS PEAK HOUR UNK VOLUMES • : r • o KE11►IIII► • I m e O o w 1b 83 SW 8 to Avenue,ste.105 I n Tigard,OR 97224 m • .i 1 I. 1 z m I Phone:503-620-4242 Fax:503 620-4545 • 14 .J L 0 ..- 7 0 email: rw@ uaitt PHF TOTAL www.qualitycount n s.et� • 0 -► 0.94 r 0 HV=39% 1283 HV=0% PEAK HOUR PED • 9 -; j"' 0 23 --► 0 —+ CROSSING VOLUMES t r a . 1 o N m O 1 11 m ♦•P♦i, ♦♦ •♦ > ii•i� • _ •iiii.ii•..iii i„..........................4.i....•i♦♦i ii i i i • �♦�♦• PEAK HOUR: 7:15 AM PEAK 15 MINUTES: 7:30 AM v,,•■•■■ • TO TO 8:15 AM 7:45 AM p • 5-MINUTE COUNT Boones Ferry- N/A- Boones Ferry- Fanno Ck PI- Crosswalk Usage • PERIOD (Southbound) TOTAL ( ) (Westbound) (Northbound) (Eastbound) (Peds By Approach) BEGINNING AT Right Thru Lett Right Thru Lett Right Thru Lett Right Thru Lett North East South West Veh Peds • 7:00 AM 2 26 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 0 7:05 AM 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 67 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 99 0 • 7:10 AM 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 55 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 86 0 7:15 AM 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 93 0 • 7:20 AM 1 43 0 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 2 0 • 0 0 0 99 0 7:25 AM 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 72 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 0 • 7:30 AM 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 78 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 117 0 7:35 AM 1 40 0 0 0 0 0 63 '1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 107 0 • 7:40 AM 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 78 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 ' 118 0 7:45 AM 1 46 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 113 0 411111 7:50 AM 2 31 0 0 0 0 0 73 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 0 7:55 AM 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 115 0 • 8:00 AM 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 0 • 8:05 AM 1 39 0 0 0 0 0 72 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 0 8:10 AM 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 77 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 117 0 • 8:15 AM 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 , 0 8:20 AM 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 53 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 0 . 8:25 AM 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 0 8:30 AM 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 • 8:35 AM 1 34 0 0 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 0 8:40 AM 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 0 • 8:45 AM 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 87 0 8:50 AM 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 92 0 • 8:55 AM 1 43 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 0 • • • • • HOURLY TOTALS Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians By Approach _ TOTAL • Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett Right Thru Lett Right Thru Left West East North South Veh Peds 7:00 AM 7 415 0 0 0 0 0 787 1 9 0 18 0 0 0 0 1237 0 • 7:15 AM 6 449 0 0 0 0 0 804 1 9 0 14 0 0 0 0 1283 0 7:30 AM 5 447 0 0 0 0 0 800 3 8 0 10 0 0 0 0 1273 0 • 7:45 AM 5 431 0 0 0 0 0 751 2 5 0 3 0 0 0 0 1197 0 8:00 AM 3 429 0 0 0 0 0 692 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1129 0 • . • • Version 3.1 • • • INTERSECTION: Boones Ferry—/Pac Trust- START TIME: 7:00 AM • PROJECT ID#: 7533 END TIME: 9:00 AM • OC JOB#: 10108503 DATE: 8/112005 • PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS PEAK HOUR LINK VOLUMES S S . r • MINI& ( , o c v e a t 1iLtf5 SW 5 t Avenue,ete.105• n Tigard,OR 97224 • .1 1 I I. + = m Phone:503-620-4242 Fax:503 620-4545 • 0 L 6 .— 0 .— 6 email:jrw @qualitycounts.net PHF TOTAL www.qualitycounts.net • 0 -. 0.79 1 0 HV=0% 57 HV=0% PEAK HOUR PED . 1 -; r 0 1 -+ 50 —.- CROSSING VOLUMES • 1 t r - o t 0 __ • o o 1 II co) ! i.: ••• 0 �.•:.•.:.❖.•:•: 0 It • PEAK HOUR: 8:00 AM PEAK 15 MINUTES: 8:15 AM !:❖: . TO TO 4:00 AM 8:30 AM 0 • 5-MINUTE COUNT Boones Ferry— Pac Trust— Boones Ferry— Tru-Green South— Crosswalk Usage • PERIOD (Southbound) (Westbound) (Northbound) (Eastbound) (Peds By Approach) TOTAL BEGINNING AT Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett Right Thru Lett Right Thru Left North East South West Veh Peds • 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:05 AM 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 • 7:10 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 7:15 AM 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 • 7:20 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 • 7:25 AM 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 7:30 AM 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 • 7:35 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 7:40 AM 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 • 7:45 AM 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 7:50 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 II 7:55 AM 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 8:00 AM 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 5 0 • 8:05 AM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 8:10 AM 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 • 8:15 AM 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 8:20 AM 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 • 8:25 AM 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8:30 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 • 8:35 AM 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 8:40 AM 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 • 8:45 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 8:50 AM 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 • 8:55 AM 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 • • • • • • HOURLY TOTALS Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians By Approach TOTAL • Right Thru Left , Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left North East South West Veh Peds • 7:00 AM 0 0 34 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 �0 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 7:15 AM 0 0 37 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 • 7:30 AM 0 0 41 10 0 . 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 7:45 AM 0 0 42 8 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 0 • 8:00 AM 0 0 47 6 ' 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 0 • • Version 3.1 • • INTERSECTION: Boones Ferry-/N/A- START TIME: 7:00 AM • • PROJECT ID#: 7533 END TIME: 9:00 AM a • OC JOB ft: 10108504 DATE: 8/11/2005 • PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS PEAK HOUR LINK VOLUMES , ■ il • o 01110111.o o ° t 10'[8.7 SW natn Avenue,Ste.105 • • a • Tigard,OR 97224 .1 t L. L _.I 4 . ° Phone:503-620-4242 • Fax:503 620-4545 0 L 0 - 11 4- 0 email:irwOqualitycounts.net • PHF TOTAL www.qualitycounts.net • 0 -► 0.69 - 0 HV=0% 11 HV=0% PEAK HOUR PED • 0 -4, r 0 0 - 0 -. CROSSING VOLUMES tr ° e t ii l ••••••••••••• 0 I VAMP,A MA OW t 0 .......••....•.s. r ..,..m.i.: ..........: ,........: . :::::.:.:.:::.:.:.:.::. •• N.4. .. PEAK HOUR: 8:00 AM PEAK 15 MINUTES: 8:45 AM ,:.:.w TO TO • 9:00 AM 9:00 AM 0 • 5-MINUTE COUNT Boones Ferry- N/A- Boones Ferry- Tru-Green North(6)- Crosswalk Usage PERIOD (Southbound) (Westbound) (Northbound) (Eastbound) (Peds By Approach) TOTAL • BEGINNING AT Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett North East South West Veh Peds _ _ g • 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:05 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 • 7:10 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 7:20 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:25 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 7:30 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7:35 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 7:40 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0• 0 0 0 • 7:50 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:55 AM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 • 8:00 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8:05 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 • 8:10 AM 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 . 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 8:20 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:25 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 • 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:35 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 8:40 AM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 8:45 AM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 • 8:50 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8:55 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 • • • • • • Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians By Approach __ TOTAL HOURLY TOTALS , • Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left North East South West Veh Peds 7:00 AM 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 • 7:15 AM 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 8 0 7:30 AM 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 • 7:45 AM 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 8:00 AM 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 • • • Version 3.1 • • INTERSECTION: Boones Ferry/Drivewa ,ss Street— START TIME: 7:00 AM • PROJECT ID#: 7533 END TIME: 9:00 AM a • QC JOB#: 10108505 DATE: 8/11/1005 • PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS PEAK HOUR LINK VOLUMES , i II • o M UNIT► N 5> w f 1trettO SW 8btn Avenue,Ste.105 • I I u ra Tigard,OR 97224 I l = m Phone:503-620-4242 • .� t �. Fax:503 620-0545 1 L 9 4— 20 4-• 12 email:jrw @qualitycounts.net • PHF TOTAL www.qualitycounts.net 0 —+ 0.90 4— 0 HV=6% 1394 j HV= % 42 • PEAK HOUR PED • t6 Z r 3 17 y 42 — CROSSING VOLUMES . • 41 1 1. r CD in 1--- ..I :::: :1 • •••.. 0 0 s.❖.: • PEAK HOUR: 7:30 AM PEAK 15 MINUTES: 7:30 AM a:: :: TO TO • 8:30 AM 7:45 AM 0 • 5-MINUTE COUNT Boones Ferry— Driveway Across Street— Boones Ferry— Carman Center South— Crosswalk Usage TOTAL • PERIOD (Southbound) (Westbound) (Northbound) (Eastbound) (Peds By Approach) Ri BEGINNING AT Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett North East South West Veh Peds • • 7:00 AM 0 28 2 1 0 0 0 59 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 92 1 7:05 AM 0 31 3 0 0 0 1 64 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 0 • 7:10 AM 0 30 3 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 0 7:15 AM 0 36 5 2 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 0 • 7:20 AM 3 44 3 0 0 0 0 53 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 0 7:25 AM 2 31 1 0 0 0 0 66 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 103. 0 • 7:30 AM 1 40 7 1 0 0 1 79 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 133 0 7:35 AM 0 43 0 0 0 3 1 60 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 111 0 • 7:40 AM 0 46 4 0 0 0 2 87 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 143 0 7:45 AM 0 47 0 1 0 0 2 58 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 111 0 • 7:50 AM 1 34 0 0 0 0 0 71 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 0 7:55 AM 1 50 3 0 0 0 3 67 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 130 0 • 8:00 AM 1 46 1 1 0 0 2 44 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 0 8:05 AM 0 40 3 0 0 0 0 71 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 115 0 • 8:10 AM 0 39 2 2 0 0 1 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 121 0 8:15 AM 0 33 5 0 0 0 0 71 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 • 8:20 AM 0 33 1 4 0 0 1 63 1 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 103 0 8:25 AM 1 46 2 0 0 0 1 58 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 113 0 • 8:30 AM 0 23 1 3 0 1 0 44 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 76 0 8:35 AM 0 44 1 0 0 0 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 0 • 8:40 AM 1 40 . 6 0 0 1 2 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 105 0 8:45 AM 0 35 0 1 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 0 • 8:50 AM 0 51 2 2 0 1 0 42 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 0 8:55 AM 2 46 0 1 0 0 1 50 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 0 • • . • • • • • Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians By Approach TOTAL HOURLY TOTALS • Right Thru Lett Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett North East South West Veh Peds 7:00 AM 8 460 31 5 0 3 10 781 17 17 0 0 0 1 0 0 1332 1 • 7:15 AM 9 496 29 7 0 3 12 784 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 1372 0 7:30 AM 5 497 28 9 0 3 14 806 15 16 0 1 0 0 0 0 1394 0 • 7:45 AM 5 475 25 11 0 2 12 735 10 12 0 2 0 0 0 0 1289 0 8:00 AM 5 476 24 14 0 3 8 688 5 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 1234 0 • • • Version 3.1 • • • INTERSECTION: Boones Ferry-/N/A- ' START TIME: 7:00 AM PROJECT ID#: 7533 END TIME: 9:00 AM .....,,, • QC JOB 4: 10108502 DATE: 8111/2005 • PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS PEAK HOUR LINK VOLUMES , , II • cv O o - t W.11111011.1b b Sw turn Avenue,Ste.105 • I a Tigard,OR 97224 .4.1 1 I I t = 'O Phone:503-620-4242 • L Fax:503 620-4545 13 L 0 4- 14 4- 0 email:)rwGqualitycounts.net • PHF TOTAL www.qualitycounts.net 0 0.92 4— 0 HVo0% 33 HV=0% • • PEAK HOUR PED • 6 -i r 0 19 — 0 -* CROSSING VOLUMES • -� t r m e t • N O O �� N i'.'0..� iii Oi'i O.'i.'i'i 0 . .04. .'.Oi 0 • !i'iiiii.':i'.4'i Oi..il O • ♦.. PEAK HOUR: 7:45 AM PEAK 15 MINUTES: 8:30 AM TO TO • 8:45 AM 8:45 AM 0 • 5-MINUTE COUNT Boones Ferry- N/A- Boones Ferry- Studd's Dwy- Crosswalk Usage TOTAL PERIOD (Southbound) (Westbound) (Northbound) (Eastbound) (Peds By Approach) • BEGINNING AT Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett North East South West Veh Peds • 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:05 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 • 7:10 AM 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 7:15 AM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 • 7:20 AM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 7:25 AM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 • 7:30 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 7:35 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 • 7:40 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 • 7:50 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 7:55 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 • 8:00 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 8:05 AM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 • 8:10 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 • 8:20 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8:25 AM 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 • 8:30 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 8:35 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 • 8:40 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 8:45 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 • 8:50 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 8:55 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • • • • • • Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians By Approach TOTAL HOURLY TOTALS l • — Right Thru left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left North East South West Veh Peds 7:D0 AM 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 7 0 0 0 0 27 0 • 7:15 AM 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 0 9 0 0 0 0 30 0 7:30 AM 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 0 10 0 0 0 0 31 0 • 7:45 AM 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 13 0 0 0 0 33 0 8:00 AM 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 10 0 0 0 0 30 0 • • • Version 3.1 • • . INTERSECTION: SW 72nd Ave(north)--/S.er Boones Ferry Rd- START TIME: 4:00 PM • • PROJECT IDe: 7533 END TIME: 6:00 PM • OC JOB k: 10106810 DATE: 8110/2005 • PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS PEAK HOUR LINK VOLUMES , i • 00111►1II. ° tD f 1 um SW tutu Avenue,ate.105 v m • I ii m Tigard,OR 97224 • .1 1 E. 1 'x v Phone:503-620-4242 Fax:503 620-4545• 15 -? t- 92 4-- 23 4— 463 email:)rw @qualitycounts.net • PHF TOTAL www.qualltycounts.net 80 -+ 0.92 - 13 HV=3% 2128 HV=5% • PEAK HOUR PED • 5 —i, r 358 100 -+ 775 -y CROSSING VOLUMES ' t r o t o tD gm 1 In .. Vi •••• • PEAK HOUR: 4:00 PM PEAK 15 MINUTES: 4:30 PM '•...•, TO TO • 5:00 PM 4:45 PM 0 • 5-MINUTE COUNT SW 72nd Ave(north)- SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd- SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd- Driveway- Crosswalk Usage TOTAL • PERIOD (Southbound) (Westbound) (Northbound) (Eastbound) (Peds By Approach) BEGINNING AT Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett Right Thru Left North East South West Veh Peds • 4:00 PM 0 37 13 5 1 21 40 21 1 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 146 0 4:05 PM 0 39 12 9 4 28 53 34 0 1 4 1 0 1 0 0 185 1 4111 4:10 PM 0 55 10 12 0 32 50 34 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 194 0 4:15 PM 0 42 14 12 0 36 40 32 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 183 0 • 4:20 PM 0 48 20 9 1 26 34 31 1 1 8 1 0 0 0 0 180 0 4:25 PM 1 39 19 8 1 27 35 22 0 1 -6 1 0 0 0 0 160 0 • 4:30 PM 0 39 16 3 1 27 52 29 1 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 186 0 4:35 PM 0 36 20 5 1 41 53 33 2 1 18 4 0 0 0 0 214 0 411/ 4:40 PM 0 50 10 8 1 24 46 32 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 177 0 4:45 PM 0 36 19 5 1 32 34 29 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 161 0 5 4:50 PM 0 27 9 6 2 31 37 32 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 149 1 4:55 PM 3 44 12 10 0 33 47 39 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 193 0 1110 5:00 PM 0 18 10 11 1 30 34 33 0 4 10 2 0 0 0 0 153 0 5:05 PM 0 23 12 3 1 27 47 38 1 1 9 2 0 0 0 0 164 0 411/ 5:10 PM 0 29 12 6 5 32 34 35 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 160 0 5:15 PM 0 23 2 7 3 36 46 40 0 1 12 2 0 0 0 0 172 0 • 5:20 PM 0 17 12 5 2 18 17 28 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 105 0 5:25 PM 3 33 10 3 1 18 39 32 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 144 0 411110 5:30 PM 0 31 5 .3 0 30 45 37 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 153 0 5:35 PM 1 24 11 7 5 20 38 32 1 1 5 2 0 0 0 0 147 0 • 5:40 PM 2 18 9 2 0 25 39 34 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 134 0 5:45 PM 2 28 6 7 1 32 33 40 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 154 0 • 5:50 PM 2 44 13 3 2 43 64 35 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 209 0 5:55 PM 0 46 8 8 2 47 25 24 1 1 4 2 0 3 0 2 168 5 • • . • • • • • Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians By Approach TOTAL HOURLY TOTALS Right Thru Left Right Thru Left North East South West Veh Peds • 4:00 PM 4 492 174 92 13 358 521 368 6 5 BO 15 0 2 0 0 2128 2 11110 4:15 PM 4 431 173 86 15 366 493 385 5 9 94 19 0 1 0 0 2080 1 4:30 PM 6 375 144 72 19 349 486 400 4 9 95 19 0 1 0 0 1978 1 • 4:45 PM 9 323 123 68 21 332 457 409 2 10 65 16 0 1 0 0 1835 1 5:00 PM 10 334 110 65 23 358 461 408 4 11 60 19 0 3 0 2 1863 5 0 • - • Version 3.1 • . • INTERSECTION: 72nd Ave(north)/UppW_ nes Ferry Rd- START TIME: 4:35 PM • PROJECT ID#: 7355 END TIME: 6:00 PM ao, • _ QC JOB 8: 10106810 DATE: 8/32005 • PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS PEAK HOUR UNK VOLUMES , , 1 e � 8 r TtiZllO�'1N WVI AVenUe,Ste.105 III e I m I a e Tigard,OR 97224 I 4 = v Phone:503-620-4242 • Fax:503 620-4545 • 12 PHF L 57 4- 58 TOTAL 4- 565 email:)rw @qualitycounts.net www.qualltycounts.net • 58 -+ 0.96 4- 28 HV=4% 2243 HV=3% PEAK HOUR PED • 11 -i r 480 81 -► 762 -• CROSSING VOLUMES • I t r W ;� I♦ 0 A 'n a 2 4 1' W ::� .•...•••: ❖.•..•...❖: • ..::•: PEAK HOUR: 4:35 PM PEAK 15 MINUTES: 4:50 PM n:i t V TO T • O 5:35 PM 5:05 PM 0 • 5-MINUTE COUNT 72nd Ave(north)- Upper Boones Ferry Rd- Upper Boones Ferry Rd- N/A- Crosswalk Usage TOTAL . PERIOD (Southbound) (Westbound) (Northbound) (Eastbound) (Peds By Approach) BEGINNING AT Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left North East South West Veh Peds • 4:35 PM 0 41 17 2 4 +39 49 31. 0 0 8 3 0 3 0 0 194 3 4:40 PM 3 40 19 4 1 51 43 25 2 0 7 1 0 0 ,0 0 196 0 • 4:45 PM 1 44 11 5 5 35 47 36 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 186 2 4:50 PM 0 53 14 4 3 30 32 33 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 177 0 • 4:55 PM 3 39 16 10 2 46 53 35 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 210 0 5:00 PM 0 42 11 5 3 34 51 34 2 0 13 1 0 0 0 3 196 3 • 5:05 PM 1 32 17 5 1 40 41 39 1 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 185 0 5:10 PM 2 28 10 7 4 50 35 27 1 1 7 1 0 0 0 0 173 0 • 5:15 PM 1 47 24 1 2 44 36 32 4 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 197 0 520 PM 1 30 5 9 1 49 48 33 4 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 187 0 • 525 PM 1 45 12 5 2 35 41 31 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 175 0 5:30 PM 1 37 24 0 0 27 48 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 167 0 O 5:35 PM 2 33 12 1 0 53 38 21 2 1 6 2 0 0 0 0 171 0 5:40 PM 0 21 19 7 1 54 41 25 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 169 1 • 5:45 PM 1 29 18 3 1 51 37 22 1 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 169 0 5:50 PM 0 25 7 9 2 56 28 14 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 145 0 • 5:55 PM 0 19 12 5 0 41 31 30 2 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 145 0 • • 13 I 451 I 175 59 I 24 I 497 511 I 375 I 16 12 I 49 I 11 • • • • • • . • • Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians By Approach TOTAL HOURLY TOTALS • Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left North East South West Veh Peds 4:35 PM 14 478 180 57 28 480 524 365 16 11 58 12 0 4 0 4 2243 8 • 4:50 PM 13 436 182 57 20 513 501 361 17 12 51 13 0 1 0 3 2176 4 • • • • Version 3.1 • INTERSECTION: SW Upper Boones Ferry SW 72nd Ave(south)- START TIME: 4:00 PM • PRO • PROJECT IOU: 7533 END TIME: 6:00 PM a • OC JOB*: 10106811 DATE: 813/2005 • PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS PEAK HOUR LINK VOLUMES , . II • e 0111011► o e e m e t 1646 SW 6btfl Avenue,ate.105 • m I w I a Tigard,OR 97224 I 1 = Phone:503-620-4242 • .1 1 1. Fax:503 620-4545 1 _I L 234 4- 0 .4- 265 email:jrw @qualltycounts.net • PHF TOTAL www.qualitycounts.net • 3 -+ 0.97 4- 0 HV=0% 7922 HV=6% PEAK HOUR PED • 2 r 31 6 157 CROSSING VOLUMES t r t o m i m • . ......:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:: 3 • PEAK HOUR: 4:45 PM PEAK 15 MINUTES: 5:15 PM %��w•,�., TO TO • 5:45 PM 5:30 PM 0 • 5-MINUTE COUNT SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd- SW 72nd Ave(south)- SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd- Driveway- Crosswalk Usage TOTAL • PERIOD (Southbound) (Westbound) (Northbound) (Eastbound) (Peds By Approach) BEGINNING AT Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett North East South West Veh Peds • 4:00 PM 0 69 9 18 0 1 1 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 155 0 4:05 PM 0 66 9 21 0 5 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 151 1 • 4:10 PM 0 78 19 14 0 6 1 44 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 162 2 4:15 PM 0 67 9 18 0 0 1 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 155 0 • 4:20 PM 1 65 11 30 0 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 149 1 4:25 PM 0 60 19 16 0 0 1 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 135 0 • 4:30 PM 0 59 10 25 0 1 2 48 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 145 1 4:35 PM 0 58 10 25 0 1 1 51 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 147 3 • 4:40 PM 0 73 14 20 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 161 4 - 4:45 PM 0 69 15 20 0 2 1 61 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 168 1 • 4:50 PM 0 70 7 18 0 2 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 148 0 4:55 PM 0 62 15 27- 0 1 0 57 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 163 1 • 5:00 PM 0 68 16 24 0 4 0 56 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 169 1 5:05 PM 0 68 13 24 0 5 0 51 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 162 0 • 5:10 PM 0 70 11 21 0 5 1 49 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 157 1 5:15 PM 0 77 14 14 0 3 1 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 179 0 • 5:20 PM 0 74 12 21 0 1 2 51 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 162 1 5:25 PM 0 77 5 20 0 2 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 155 0 • 5:30 PM 0 61 12 12 0 3 1 62 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 153 0. 5:35 PM 0 73 16 13 0 1 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 146 0 • 5:40 PM 0 79 12 20 0 2 0 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 160 0 5:45 PM 0 65 14 18 0 6 1 44 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 150 1 • 5:50 PM 0 82 B 11 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 139 0 . 5:55 PM 0 57 9 21 0 0 1 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 0 • • • • • • • Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians By Approach TOTAL HOURLY TOTALS • Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett North East South West Veh Peds 4:00 PM 1 796 147 252 0 19 8 614 0 1 1_ 0 1 10 3 0 1839 14 • 4:15 PM 1 789 150 268 0 21 7 619 0 1 3 0 2 10 1 0 1859 13 4:30 PM 0 825 142 259 0 27 8 650 0 1 3 1 2 10 1 0 1916 13 • 4:45 PM 0 848 148 234 0 31 6 649 0 2 3 1 2 3 0 0 1922 5 5:00 PM 0 851 142 219 0 32 7 612 1 1 3 2 1 3 0 0 1870 4 • • • Version 3.1 • • INTERSECTION: SW 74th Ave-/SW Durha START TIME: 4:00 PM • PROJECT ID&: 7533 END TIME: 6:00 PM a • OC JOBS_ 10106812 _ _ DATE: 8/3/2005 lel . • PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS PEAK HOUR LINK VOLUMES • ; • ae * 11h11 o N °m a f 1bZSb Sw ebtn Avenue,Ste.105 • I I ii Tigard,OR 97224 1 1 = Phone:503-620-4242 I !!! • .J 1 � Fax:503 620-4545 • 19 .J PHF L 13 •-1168 TOTAL 4-1148 email:jrw @qualitycounts.net www.qualitycounts.net • • 845 -4. I 0.96 I 4- 1135 HV=4% 2072 HV=2% - PEAK HOUR PED • 0 .4 r 0 864 -+ 872 -► CROSSING VOLUMES • 41 f r ° e f 91 • —1 0 c, o r I. it 0 1--- ,:.:.;... :::::..,.:: . „..,:.::::::.:„...„; ............ • A*: PEAK HOUR: 5:00 PM PEAK 15 MINUTES: 5:30 PM !N�••• TO TO • 6:00 PM 5:45 PM 0 • 5-MINUTE COUNT SW 74th Ave- SW Durham Rd- N/A- SW Durham Rd- Crosswalk Usage TOTAL • PERIOD (Southbound) (Westbound) (Northbound) (Eastbound) (Peds By Approach) BEGINNING AT Right Thru Lett Right Thru Lett Right Thru Left Right Thru Left North East South West Veh Peds • 4:00 PM 2 0 3 5 81 0 0 0 0 0 70 2 1 0 0 0 163 1 4:05 PM 2 0 2 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 58 1 0 0 0 0 159 0 • 4:10 PM 1 0 0 1 92 0 0 0 0 0 77 1 0 0 0 0 172 0 4:15 PM 1 0 2 1 80 0 0 0 0 0 68 1 1 0 0 0 153 1 • 4:20 PM 2 0 4 2 94 0 0 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 163 0 4:25 PM 1 0 4 1 70 0 0 0 0 0 50 2 0 0 0 0 128 0 • 4:30 PM 2 0 3 3 82 0 0 0 0 0 57 0 1 0 0 0 147 1 4:35 PM 1 0 2 1 74 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 1 0 0 0 143 1 • 4:40 PM 2 0 3 1 80 0 0 0 0 0 72 0 2 0 0 0 158 2 4:45 PM 1 0 0 1 80 0 0 0 0 0 64 1 0 0 0 0 147 0 • 4:50 PM 0 0 0 5 87 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 1 0 0 0 172 1 4:55 PM 4 0 7 3 80 0 0 0 0 0 49 0 1 0 0 0 143 1 • 5:00 PM 4 0 1 0 81 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 0 0 148 0 5:05 PM 2 0 6 0 102 0 0 0 0 0 77 3 2 3 0 0 190 5 • 5:10 PM 4 0 5 2 102 0 0 0 0 0 77 ' 2 2 0 0 0 192 2 5:15 PM 3 0 3 0 95 0 0 0 0 0 67 1 0 0 0 0 . 169 0 • 5:20 PM 3 0 1 2 93 0 0 0 0 0 83 2 0 0 0 0 184 0 5:25 PM 3 0 0 0 81 0 0 0 0 0 64 2 1 0 0 0 150 1 • 5:30 PM 2 0 2 2 92 0 0 0 0 0 76 3 2 0 0 0 177 2 5:35 PM 1 0 1 2 98 0 0 0 0 0 85 0 2 0 0 0 187 2 • 5:40 PM 2 0 3 1 111 0 0 0 0 0 57 2 1 0 0 0 176 1 5:45 PM 3 0 1 1 83 0 0 0 0 0 74 3 1 0 0 0 165 1 • 5:50 PM 2 0 2 2 102 0 0 0 0 0 61 1 1 0 0 0 170 1 • 5:55 PM 4 0 2 1 95 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 2 0 0 0 164 2 • • • • • • Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians By Approach TOTAL HOURLY TOTALS • Right Thru Lett Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett Right Thru Left } North East South West Veh Peds 4:00 PM 19 0 30 24 996 0 0 0 0 0 771 8 8 0 0 0 1848 8 • 4:15 PM 24 0 37 20 1012 0 0 0 0 0 782 9 11 3 0 0 1884 14 4:30 PM ' 29 0 31 18 1037 0 0 0 0 0 817 11 11 3 0 0 1943 14 • 4:45 PM 29 0 29 18 1102 0 0 0 0 0 841 16 12 3 0 0 2035 15 5:00 PM 33 0 27 13 1135 0 0 0 0 0. 845 19 14 3 0 0 2072 17 • • • Version 3.1 • • INTERSECTION: SW Upper Boones FerrrOSW Durham Rd- START TIME: 4:00 PM • • PROJECT ID#: 7533 END TIME: 6:00 PM ci; OC JOB#: 10106813 DATE: 8/3/2005 • PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS PEAK HOUR LINK VOLUMES • , 1 II • o MINI► ,, m N t 1b 8a SW is bill Avenue,Ste.105 • I a Tigard,OR 97224 1 1 = it; Phone:503-620-4242 • Fax:503 620-4545 MO —f L 11 A—1131 - 437 email:)rw @quaiitycounts.net • PHF TOTAL G www.qualitycounts.net 299 -0. 0.97 4- 413 HV=2% 2839 HV=1% • PEAK HOUR PED • 298 r 13 897 w 342 -+ CROSSING VOLUMES l t r Q o t • r N r 0 • > t..........: . 1111♦1:: 1♦1♦1♦� ••1•♦•1.1.1•• •••••••••••• •♦11.1.111111 • D 111111111111 1 111111.1111 ♦1♦♦1111111• �.1.. 11.1 • PEAK HOUR: 4:45 PM PEAK 15 MINUTES: 5:00 PM :�;�;�M TO TO • 5:45 PM 5:15 PM 0 • 5-MINUTE COUNT sw upper Boones Ferny ad- SW Durham Rd- SW upper Boones Ferry Rd- SW Durham Rd- Crosswalk Usage TOTAL PERIOD (Southbound) (Westbound) (Northbound) (Eastbound) (Peds By Approach) • >a BEGINNING AT Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett Right Thru Left Right Thru Left North East South West Veh Peds • 4:00 PM 4:05 PM 32 24 5 0 27 1 0 16 20 17 22 41 0 0 0 0 205 0 28 29 3 0 44 1 0 23 20 18 20 16 0 0 0 0 202 0 • 4:10 PM 39 39 8 4 20 0 0 27 27 17 28 21 0 0 0 0 230 0 4:15 PM 34 28 1 0 28 3 2 22 21 22 34 21 0 0 0 0 216 0 • 4:20 PM 38 34 3 2 25 1 0 15 31 9 16 20 0 0 0 1 194 1 4:25 PM 24 26 2 1 26 3 0 19 22 10 21 21 0 0 0 0 175 0 • 4:30 PM 21 25 3 5 29 1 1 21 33 17 20 19 0 0 0 0 195 0 4:35 PM 22 35 0 3 31 0 2 18 19 21 18 31 0 0 0 0 200 0 • 4:40 PM 33 27 2 2 28 0 1 23 25 28 25 29 0 0 0 0 223 0 4:45 PM 38 46 0 1 23 0 0 32 17 25 20 23 0 0 0 0 225 0 • 4:50 PM 30 28 2 1 47 1 0 26 21 28 24 25 0 0 0 0 233 0 4:55 PM 34 46 5 1 26 1 1 26 20 16 16 21 0 0 0 0 213 0 • 5:00 PM 31 30 4 0 38 0 1 22 16 28 17 30 0 0 0 0 217 0 5:05 PM 31 33 0 0 40 2 1 33 33 30 29 17 0 0 0 0 249 0 • 5:10 PM 49 40 5 0 29 2 0 25 23 38 31 26 0 0 0 0 268 0 5:15 PM 37 28 4 1 44 0 3 26 23 15 29 34 0 0 0 0 244 0 • 5:20 PM 33 47 3 1 29 3 1 23 27 27 22 24 0 0 0 0 240 0 5:25 PM 30 31 2 1 29 2 0 21 24 18 33 26 0 1 0 0 217 1 • 5:30 PM 36 44 4 1 32 0 0 35 23 16 33 26 0 0 0 0 250 0 5:35 PM 36 29 0 3 46 0 0 13 20 34 28 33 0 0 0 0 242 0 • 5:40 PM 53 35 4 1 30 2 3 25 33 23 17 15 0 0 0 0 241 0 5:45 PM 33 23 1 5 32 0 0 13 13 33 21 26 0 0 0 0 200 0 • 5:50 PM 40 47 4 0 23 0 0 31 29 19 20 13 0 0 0 0 226 0 5:55 PM 39 21 2 2 27 0 0 24 23 23 28 17 0 0 0 0 206 0 • • • • • • • Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians By Approach TOTAL HOURLY TOTALS • Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett Right Thru Left North East South West Veh Peds 4:00 PM 373 387 34 20 354 12 7 268 276 228 264 288 0 0 0 1 2511 1 • 4:15 PM 385 398 27 16 370 14 9 282 281 272 271 283 0 0 0 1 2608 1 4:30 PM 389 416 30 16 393 12 11 296 281 291 284 305 0 1 0 0 2724 1 • 4:45 PM 438 437 33 11 413 13 10 307 280 298 299 300 0 1 0 0 2839 1 5:00 PM 448 408 33 15 399 11 9 291 287 304 308 287 0 1 0 0 2800 1 • • • Version 3.1 • • INTERSECTION: SW Sequioa Pkwy_/SW Boones Ferry Rd- START TIME: 4:00 PM • • PROJECT IOC 7533 END TIME: 6:00 PM • _• QC JOB 4: 10106807 DATE: 813/2005 • PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS PEAK HOUR LINK VOLUMES • e *I1111h\�I► m v t 1u'Lnb Sw tlatn Avenue,Ste.105 L• m. I n N Tigard,OR 97224 4i I � 1 Phone:503-620-4242 + x e • Fax:503 620-4545 . 72 . L 408 4- 566 4- 886 email:)rw @qualitycounts.net • PHF TOTAL www.qualitycounts.net 758 -+ 0.91 472 HV=2% 2321 HV=2% • PEAK HOUR PED • 2 —4, r 6 832 -+ 1244 CROSSING VOLUMES • l t r W e t N • r r �� r ...,...: • i.. x .. •i...♦ .00iiii... i 1 •3i:i::::i:O:::i' 0 .....:::::::::::. • :.,•.W.4: ii�i PEAK HOUR: 4:30 PM PEAK 15 MINUTES: 5:00 PM .:.:::.e To TO • 5:30 PM 5:15 PM 0 • 5-MINUTE COUNT SW Sequioa Pkwy- sw Upper Bonnet Ferry Rd- SW Sequioa Pkwy- sw Upper Bonnet Ferry Rd- Crosswalk Usage TOTAL • PERIOD (Southbound) (Westbound) i (Northbound) (Eastbound) (Peds By Approach) BEGINNING AT Right Thru Lett Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left North East South West Veh Peds • 4:00 PM 2 3 33, 37 55 2 3 0 0 0 61 3 0 0 0 0 199 0 4:05 PM 0 1 52 37 37 1 0 1 2 0 74 6 0 0 0 0 213 0 • 4:10 PM 0 0 36 28 50 1 0 0 0 0 59 1 0 2 0 0 175 2 4:15 PM 3 1 45 28 39 1 0 0 0 1 54 6 0 0 0 0 178 0 • 4:20 PM 7 1 53 36 43 1 0 2 1 0 46 6 0 0 0 0 196 0 4:25 PM 1 0 30 27 51 0 1 0 0 1 58 2 0 1 0 0 171 1 • 4:30 PM 2 8 20 25 42 1 1 0 2 0 80 6 0 0 0 0 187 0 4:35 PM '9 0 35 36 37 0 4 0 0 0 74 4 0 0 0 0 199 0 • 4:40 PM 8 0 48 28 36 1 1 0 1 2 64 8 2 0 0 0 197 2 4:45 PM 5 , 0 38 26 35 0 2 0 0 0 67 3 0 0 0 0 176 0 • 4:50 PM 4 1 38 26 39 0 2 1 1 0 57 5 0 0 0 0 174 0 4:55 PM 7 0 28 34 43 . 0 3 0 1 0 66 8 0 0 0 0 190 0 • 5:00 PM 9 0 50 32 33 1 4 1 1 0 75 4 0 0 0 0 210 0 5:05 PM 5 0 57 46 42 1 3 4 0 0 68 3 0 0 0 0 229 0 • 5:10 PM 12 2 40 36 45 0 2 1 1 0 53 8 0 0 0 0 200 0 5:15 PM 7 0 35 35 41 2 2 0 2 0 51 3 0 0 0 1 178 1 • 5:20 PM 1 0 35 32 46 0 3 2 4 0 57 10 0 0 0 0 190 0 5:25 PM 12 0 33 52 33 0 2 3 0 0 46 10 0 0 0 0 191 0 • 5:30 PM 7 0 28 43 26 2 0 0 1 0 73 4 0 0 0 0 184 0 5:35 PM 13 0 37 44 31 1 0 0 0 0 43 1 0 0 0 1 170 1 • 5:40 PM 10 0 47 40 48 0 1 0 0 1 54 4 0 0 0 0 205 0 5:45 PM 8 0 33 24 46 0 1 0 2 1 52 7 0 0 0 0 174 0 • 5:50 PM 5 1 27 31 55 0 0 0 0 0 48 6 0 0 0 0 173 0 5:55 PM 3 0 34 30 49 0 0 0 0 2 42 6 0 0 0 0 166 0 • • • • • • • Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians By Approach TOTAL HOURLY TOTALS • Right Thru Left .Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett Right Thru Left North East South West Veh Peds 4:00 PM 48 15 456 368 507 8 17 4 8 4 760 60 2 3 0 0 2255 5 • 4:15 PM 72 13 482 380 485 6 23 9 8 4 762 63 2 1 0 0 2307 3 4:30 PM 81 11 457 408 472 6 29 12 13 2 758 72 2 0 0 1 2321 3 • 4:45 PM 92 3 466 446 462 7 24 12 11 1 710 63 0 0 0 2 2297 2 5:00 PM 92 3 456 445 495 7 18 11 11 4 662 66 0 0 0 2 2270 2 • • • Version 3.1 • • INTERSECTION: Boons Ferry-/N/A- • START TIME: 4:00 PM • • PROJECT IDk: 7533 END TIME: 6:00 PM 1 (1401: OC JOB 4: 70108507 DATE: 8/11/2005 • ---1I • PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS PEAK HOUR LINK VOLUMES I , i II • a 1011.1101111. v, o o m f 1tiZbb SW tibtn Avenue,ate.105 • it Tigard,OR 97224 .J 1 1. j x x a Phone:503-620-4242 • Fax:503 620-4545 4 _t L 0 • • 7 4- 0 email:Jrw®qualitycounts.net • PHF TOTAL www.qualitycounts.net 0 -0. 0.71 4- 0 HV=6% 20 HV=0% • PEAK HOUR PED • 9 -i, r 0 13 -• 0 -. CROSSING VOLUMES • 1 t r t 0 • N O O r .I. ••••• II N �•.•.•.■.: 4110 = (1 is ` � 0 • ,....: PEAK HOUR: 4:30 PM PEAK 15 MINUTES: 5:15 PM ,t0,4., TO TO • 5:30 PM 5:30 PM 0 • 5-MINUTE COUNT Boones Ferry- N/A- Boones Ferry- Fenno Ck P1- Crosswalk Usage TOTAL • PERIOD (Southbound) (Westbound) (Northbound) (Eastbound) (Peds By Approach) Ri BEGINNING AT Right Thru _ Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left North East South West Veh Peds • 4:00 PM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4:05 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 • 4:10 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 • 4:20 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4:25 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 • 4:30 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4:35 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 • 4:40 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 • 4:50 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:55 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 5:00 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5:05 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 • 5:10 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 • 5:20 PM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5:25 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 • 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 5:35 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 • 5:40 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 5:50 PM 0" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5:55 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • • • • • Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians By Approach TOTAL HOURLY TOTALS • Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left West East North South Veh Peds 4:00 PM 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 3 0 0 0 0 16 0 • 4:15 PM 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 0 5 0 0 0 0 18 0 . 4:30 PM 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 4 0 0 0 0 20 0 • 4:45 PM 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 5 0 0 0 0 20 0 500 PM 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 4 0 0 0 0 19 0 • • • Version 3.7 • • INTERSECTION: Boones Ferry—/Pac Trus• START TIME: 4:00 PM • PROJECT ID#: 7533 END TIME: 6:00 PM a • OC JOB#: 10108508 DATE: 8/11!2005 • PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS PEAK HOUR LINK VOLUMES III I 1011101111.0 0 0 0 ° t 1K2oo Ki Sw tutn Avenue,ste.105 • a Tigard,OR 97224 •J 1 I , x i°n I Phone:503-620-4242 • Fax:503 620-4545 7 —t L 47 4- 1 4— 53 email:)rw @qualitycounts.net • PHF TOTAL www.qualitycounts.net• 2 —, 0.88 4- 1 HV=0% 74 HV=0% • PEAK HOUR PED • 2 — r 5 11 -4. 12 —► CROSSING VOLUMES 41• t r b t 0 „mem, • 0 0 0 a co ......:;.x..............xn. • ............1 t ....•....... .p:.:.:.:.: • PEAK HOUR: 4:30 PM PEAK 15 MINUTES: 5:00 PM .....%:: TO TO • 5:30 PM 5:15 PM 0 • 5-MINUTE COUNT Boones Ferry— Pac Trust— Boones Ferry— Tru-Green South— Crosswalk Usage TOTAL PERIOD (Southbound) (Westbound) (Northbound) (Eastbound) (Peds By Approach) • BEGINNING AT Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left North East South West Veh Peds • 4:00 PM 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 4:05 PM 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 • 4:10 PM 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4:15 PM 0 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 • 420 PM 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4:25 PM 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 • 4:30 PM 0 0 1 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 4:35 PM 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 • 4:40 PM 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 7 0 4:45 PM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 • 4:50 PM 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 • 0 4:55 PM 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 • 5:00 PM 0 0 1 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 5:05 PM 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 • 5:10 PM 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 5:15 PM 0 0 1 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 10 0 • 5:20 PM 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 5:25 PM 0 0 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 • 5:30 PM 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 5:35 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 1 . • 5:40 PM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 5:45 PM 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 • 5:50 PM 0 0 0 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5:55 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 • • • • • • • • • Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians By Approach TOTAL HOURLY TOTALS • Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett Right Thru Left West East North South Veh Peds 4:00 PM 0 0 11 45 0 3 0 9 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 65 0 • 4:15 PM 0 0 12 45 0 4 0 0 0 2 1 6 0 0 0 0 70 0 4:30 PM 0 0 10 47 1 5 0 0 0 2 2 7 0 0 0 1 74 1 • 4:45 PM 0 0 8 42 1 5 3 0 0 3 1 5 0 1 0 1 68 2 5:00 PM 0 0 5 39 1 6 3 0 0 3 1 3 0 2 0 1 61 3 • . • • Version 3.1 • • INTERSECTION: Boones Ferry—fTru-Gree (6)— START TIME: 4:00 PM • PROJECT ID#: 7533 END TIME: 6:00 PM clt • OC JOB#: 10108509 DATE: 8/112005 • PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS • PEAK HOUR LINK VOLUMES , ; li • IN o o N go f 1b2d Sw Ootn avenue,aye.105 • a Tigard,OR 97224 1 1+ j = .. Phone:503-620-4242 • Fax:503 620-4545 4 .1 L 0 4— 4 4— 0 email:Jrw®qualitycounts.net • PHF TOTAL www.qualitycounts.net 0 —0. 0.50 4— 0 HV.0% 8 HV=0% • PEAK HOUR PED • 0 —1, r 0 4 -4- 0 -+ CROSSING VOLUMES • t r e t r 0 0 ,•••. • N O O 1 N !IO•i••: • PEAK HOUR: 4:15 PM PEAK 15 MINUTES: 5:00 PM :� ::: TO TO • '5:15PM 5:15 PM 0 • 5-MINUTE COUNT Boones Ferry— Tru-Green North(6)— Boones Ferry— N/A— Crosswalk Usage TOTAL PERIOD (Southbound) (Westbound) (Northbound) (Eastbound) (Peds By Approach) • a BEGINNING AT Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left North East South West Veh Peds • 4:00 PM 0 Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:05 PM • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 4:10 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 4:20 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4:25 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 • 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:35 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 4:40 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 4:50 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:55 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 5:00 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5:05 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 • 5:10 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 5:20 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 5:25 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:35 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 • 5:40 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 5:50 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:55 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • • . • • • Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians By Approach TOTAL HOURLY TOTALS • Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett West East North South Veh Peds 4:00 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 • 4:15 PM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 6 0 4:30 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 5 0 • 4:45 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 6 0 5:00 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 6 0 • • • Version 3.1 • • INTERSECTION: Boones Ferry-/N/A- • START TIME: 4:00 PM • • PROJECT ID#: 7533 END TIME: 6:00 PM apt, _QC JOB#: 10108507 DATE: 8/11/2005 • -- PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS PEAK HOUR LINK VOLUMES • i ll • IN o o 1 d t 16255 SW um Avenue,Ste.105 • a Tigard,OR 97224 1 1 = r, Phone:503-620-4242 Fax:503 620-4545 3 _I t_ 0 4- 3 4--' 0 email:jrwequalitycounts.net • PHF TOTAL www.qualitycounts.net 0 -► 0.58 4-- 0 HV=0% 7 HV=0% • PEAK HOUR PED • 1 -4, c- 0 4 0 --► CROSSING VOLUMES • t r o t 0 • _ I. x :;*:.:+:+:4;:;:i ............t 0 ..• .. ..!000•.. .• .0.• • PEAK HOUR: 4:00 PM PEAK 15 MINUTES: 4:15 PM %tlt7A TO TO • 5:00 PM 4:30 PM 0 • 5-MINUTE COUNT Boones Ferry- WA- Boones Ferry- Studd's Dwy- Crosswalk Usage TOTAL PERIOD (Southbound) (Westbound) (Northbound) (Eastbound) (Peds By Approach) • BEGINNING AT Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett Right Thru Lett Right Thru Left North East South West Veh Peds • 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:05 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 D • 4:10 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 4:20 Pm 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4:25 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 4:35 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 • 4:40 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 4:50 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:55 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:05 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 5:10 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 5:20 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:25 PM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 • 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:35 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 5:40 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 5:50 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:55 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • • • • . • Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians By Approach TOTAL HOURLY TOTALS • Right Thru Lett Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett Right Thru Lett West East North South Veh Peds 4:00 PM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 7 0 • 4:15 PM 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 4:30 PM 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 • 4.45 PM 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 5:00 PM 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 • • • Version 9.1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Appendix B • • Description of Level-of- • Service Methods and Criteria • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Appendix B • Level of Service Concept • Level of service (LOS) is a concept developed to quantify the degree of comfort (including such • elements as travel time, number of stops, total amount of stopped delay, and impediments caused by • other vehicles) afforded to drivers as they travel through an intersection or roadway segment. Six grades • are used to denote the various level of service from A to F.l • Signalized Intersections The six level of service grades are described qualitatively for signalized intersections in Table B 1. Additionally, Table B2 identifies the relationship between level of service and average control delay per • vehicle. Control delay is defined to include initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. Using this definition, level of service D is generally considered to • represent the minimum acceptable design standard. • Table B1 • Level of Service Definitions (Signalized Intersections) • Level of • Service Average Delay per Vehicle • A Very low average control delay, less than 10 seconds per vehicle.This occurs when progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most • vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. • Average control delay is greater than 10 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 20 seconds per vehicle.This generally occurs with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. • More vehicles stop than for a level of service A,causing higher levels of average delay. • Average control delay is greater than 20 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 35 seconds per vehicle.These higher delays may result from fair progression and/or longer cycle • lengths. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level.The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, although many still pass through the intersection without • stopping. • D Average control delay is greater than 35 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 55 seconds per vehicle.The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle length, or high • volume/capacity ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. • E Average control delay is greater than 55 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 80 • seconds per vehicle.This is usually considered to be the limit of acceptable delay.These high delay values generally(but not always)indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high • volume/capacity ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. • F Average control delay is in excess of 80 seconds per vehicle.This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers.This condition often occurs with oversaturation. It may also occur • at high volume/capacity ratios below 1.0 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also contribute to such high delay values. • • • • 1 Most of the material in this appendix is adapted from the Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity • Manual, (2000). • • • • • • • • • Table B2 • Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections • Level of Service Average Control Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) • A <10.0 • B >10 and 520 • C >20 and 535 • D >35 and 555 • E >55 and 580 • F >80 • - • Unsignalized Intersections • Unsignalized intersections include two way stop controlled (TWSC) and all way stop controlled • (AWSC) intersections. The 2000 Highway Capacity Manual provides models for estimating control • delay at both TWSC and AWSC intersections. A qualitative description of the various service levels • associated with an unsignalized intersection is presented in Table B3. A quantitative definition of level • of service for unsignalized intersections is presented in Table B4. Using this definition, level of service E is generally considered to represent the minimum acceptable design standard. • I Table B3 • Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections • Level of • Service Average Delay per Vehicle to Minor Street • A • Nearly all drivers find freedom of operation. • Very seldom is there more than one vehicle in queue. • B • Some drivers begin to consider the delay an inconvenience. • • Occasionally there is more than one vehicle in queue. • Many times there is more than one vehicle in queue. • • Most drivers feel restricted, but not objectionably so. • D • Often there is more than one vehicle in queue. • Drivers feel quite restricted. • • Represents a condition in which the demand is near or equal to the probable maximum • number of vehicles that can be accommodated by the movement. E • There is almost always more than one vehicle in queue. • • Drivers find the delays approaching intolerable levels. • • Forced flow. F • Represents an intersection failure condition that is caused by geometric and/or • operational constraints external to the intersection. • I I • • • I I • • • • • Table B4 • Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections • Level of Service Average Control Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) • A <10.0 • >10.0 and 5 15.0 • C >15.0 and<_25.0 • p >25.0 and 5 35.0 • E >35.O and 550.0 • F >50.0 • • • It should be noted that the level of service criteria for unsignalized intersections are somewhat different • than the criteria used for signalized intersections. The primary reason for this difference is that drivers • expect different levels of performance from different kinds of transportation facilities. The expectation is that a signalized intersection is designed to carry higher traffic volumes than an unsignalized • intersection. Additionally, there are a number of driver behavior considerations that combine to make • delays at signalized intersections less onerous than at unsignalized intersections. For example, drivers at • signalized intersections are able to relax during the red interval, while drivers on the minor street approaches to TWSC intersections must remain attentive to the task of identifying acceptable gaps and • vehicle conflicts. Also, there is often much more variability in the amount of delay experienced by • individual drivers at unsignalized intersections than signalized intersections. For these reasons, it is • considered that the control delay threshold for any given level of service is less for an unsignalized intersection than for a signalized intersection. While overall intersection level of service is calculated for • AWSC intersections, level of service is only calculated for the minor approaches and the major street • left turn movements at TWSC intersections. No delay is assumed to the major street through • movements. For TWSC intersections, the overall intersection level of service remains undefined: level- • of-service is only calculated for each minor street lane. In the performance evaluation of TWSC intersections, it is important to consider other measures of • effectiveness (MOE's) in addition to delay, such as v/c ratios for individual movements, average queue • lengths, and 95th-percentile queue lengths. By focusing on a single MOE for the worst movement only, such as delay for the minor-street left turn, users may make inappropriate traffic control decisions. The potential for making such inappropriate decisions is likely to be particularly pronounced when the HCM • level-of-service thresholds are adopted as legal standards, as is the case in many public agencies. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Appendix C • • Existing Conditions Level- of-Service Worksheets • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Existing AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:18 Page 1-1 Existing AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:18 Page 2-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone Tigard, Oregon Existing Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak.Hour Existing Conditions Weekday AM Peak Hour Scenario Report Impact Analysis Report • Scenario: Existing AM Level Of Service Command: Existing AM Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in lume: Existing AM LOS Veh C LOS Veh C Impact Fee: Def Trip Generation: NULL Trip Distribution: NULL # 2 SW.Upper Boones/SW Durham Rd D 39.7 0.791 D 39.7 0.791 + 0.000 D/V Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes # 3 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Studd's B 14.8 0.000 B 14.8 0.000 + 0.000 D/V Configuration: Existing AM # 4 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Fanno Cr C 15.2 0.000 C 15.2 0.000 + 0.000 D/V # 5 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Pacific C 15.4 0.000 C 15.4 0.000 + 0.000 D/V # 6 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Tru-Gree A 0.0 0.000 A 0.0 0.000 + 0.000 D/V , • # 7 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Tru-Gree A 0.0 0.000 A 0.0 0.000 + 0.000 D/V # 8 SW Upper Boones/72nd Ave (sout B 14.3 0.678 B 14.3 0.678 + 0.000 D/V # 10 72nd Ave (north)/SW Upper Boon C 24.1 0.673 C 24.1 0.673 + 0.000 D/V # 11 Sequoia Pkwy/SW Upper Boones B 15.7 0.625 B 15.7 0.625 + 0.000 D/V • Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND S A i .5 7533EXAM.OUT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 1 of 6 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Existing AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:18 Page 3-1 Existing AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:18 Page 4-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Existing Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour Existing Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 SW 74th Ave/SW Durham Road Intersection #2 SW Upper Boones/SW Durham Rd ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: Al 8.7] Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.791 ******************************************************************************** Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 39.7 Street Name: SW 74th Ave SW Durham Road Optimal Cycle: 90 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ******************************************************************************** Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road SW Durham Road I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Control: Stop Sign II Stop Sign II Uncontrolled II Uncontrolled I Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Control: I II II II Protected Protected Protected Protected I II II II Rights: Include Include Include Include Volume Module: Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base Vol: 0 0 0 10 0 11 19 1172 0 0 504 49 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 10 0 11 19 1172 0 0 504 49 Volume Module: II II User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Base Vol: 131 294 3 49 152 247 471 463 229 5 181 20 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 11 0 12 20 1234 0 0 531 52 Initial Bse: 131 294 3 49 152 247 471 463 229 5 181 20 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 11 0 12 20 1234 0 0 531 52 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 I II II II PHF Volume: 146 328 3 55 170 275 525 516 255 6 202 22 Critical Gap Module: Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.3 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Reduced Vol: 146 328 3 55 170 275 525 516 255 6 202 22 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I II MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Capacity Module: Final Vol.: 146 328 3 55 170 275 525 516 255 6 202 221 Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1830 xxxx 556 582 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 83 xxxx 525 987 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Saturation F ow Module: Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 81 xxxx 525 987 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.13 xxxx 0.02 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Adjustment: 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.91 0.96 0.82 0.93 0.98 0.83 0.89 0.92 0.92 I II II II I Lanes: 1.00 0.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.10 Level Of Service Module: Final Sat.: 1753 1824 19111736 1828 1554111769 1862 1583111688 1576 1741 Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Analysis Module: LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * * * * Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.18 0.18 0.03 0.09 0.18 0.30 0.28 0.16 0.00 0.13 0.13 Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1002 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Green/Cycle: 0.11 0.28 0.28 0.05 0.22 0.22 0.38 0.53 0.53 0.01 0.16 0.1 Sharedaueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.79 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.41 0.79 0.79 0.52 0.30 0.52 0.79 0.7 Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 8.7 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Delay/Veh: 72.7 40.6 40.6 71.4 40.5 55.6 39.7 18.8 15.9 99.2 62.3 62. Shared LOS: * * * * A * * * * * * * User DelAdj: .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApproachDel: xxxxxx 8.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx AdjDel/Veh: 72.7 40.6 40.6 71.4 40.5 55.6 39.7 18.8 15.9 99.2 62.3 62.3 ApproachLOS: * A * * HCM2kAvg: 8 11 11 3 6 12 20 12 5 1 10 10 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND S P v a 7533EXAM.OUT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 2 of 6 • Existing AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:18 Page 5-1 Existing AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:18 Page 6-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Existing Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour Existing Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Studd's driveway Intersection #4 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Fanno Creek Place ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: BE 14.8] Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: CE 15.2] ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Studd's driveway Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Fanno Creek Place Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - I - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I I II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 II II II 1 1 II II II 1 Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 792 0 0 440 12 9 0 8 0 0 0 Base Vol: 1 804 0 0 443 6 14 0 9 0 0 IMP Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 1 792 0 0 440 12 9 0 8 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 1 804 0 0 443 6 14 0 9 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 1 834 0 0 463 13 9 0 8 0 0 0 PHF Volume: 1 846 0 0 466 6 15 0 9 0- 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 1 834 0 0 463 13 9 0 8 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 1 846 0 0 466 6 15 0 9 0 0 0 II II II I I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gap Module: • Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.5 xxxx 6.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.6 xxxx 3.4 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II I I II II II I Capacity Module: Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 476 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1305 xxxx 469 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cnflict Vol: 473 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1318 xxxx 469 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1076 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 170 xxxx 578 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1079 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 175 xxxx 598 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1076 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 170 xxxx 578 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1079 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 175 xxxx 598 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 298 0 xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 307 0 xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.03 xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05 xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx I II II II I Level Of Service Module: II II II Level Of Service Module: Queue:: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Queue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 8.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 8.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 386 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 379 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared0ueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd Stpoel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 14.8 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 15.2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * B * * * * Shared LOS: * * * * * * * C * * * * A roachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 14.8 xxxxxx ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 15.2 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * B * ApproachLOS: * * C Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND 7533EXAM.OUT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 3 of 6 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Existing AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:18 Page 7-1 Existing AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:18 Page 8-1 • Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Existing Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour Existing Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Pacific Trust Intersection #6 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Tru-Green (south) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 15.4] Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 0.0] ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Pacific Trust Business Center Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Tru-Green south driveway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L T R L I R L I R L T R I II II II I I II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include , Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I I II II II I Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 821 0 37 449 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Base Vol: 0 835 0 0 486 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 Initial Bse: 0 821 0 37 449 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Initial Bse: 0 835 0 0 486 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 864 0 39 473 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 PHF Volume: 0 879 0 0 512 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 864 0 39 473 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Final Vol.: 0 879 0 0 512 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.2 Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx II II II Capacity Module: II II II Capacity Module: P Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 864 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 864 Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 770 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 357 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 770 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 357 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.03 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx I II II II I Level Of Service Module: II II II I Level Of Service Module: Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.1 Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 15.4 Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * * * C LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx � SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 15.4 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * * C ApproachLOS: * * * * Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND S Y. 7533EXAM.OUT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 4 of 6 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 410 411 411 410 410 411 411 • II 411 411 411 411 411 410 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 Existing AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:18 Page 9-1 Existing AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:18 Page 10-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Existing Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour Existing Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Tru-Green (north) Intersection #8 SW Upper Boones/72nd Ave (south) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Levet Of Service: Al 0.01 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.678 ******************************************************************************** Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.3 Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Tru-Green north driveway Optimal Cycle: 57 Levet Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ******************************************************************************** Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T - R Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road SW 72nd Avenue (south) I II II II I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Control: I Protected II Protected II Permitted II Permitted I 1 11 Rights: Include Include Include Include Volume Module: II II I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base Vol: 0 835 0 0 486 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 835 0 0 486 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: II II II User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Base Vol: 2 825 13 113 492 2 0 5 1 83 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 879 0 0 512 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 2 825 13 113 492 2 0 5 1 83 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 879 0 0 512 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.9 0.97 0.9 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 2 853 13 117 509 2 0 5 1 86 Critical Gap Module: 11 II II I Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Reduced Vol: 2 853 13 117 509 2 0 5 1 86 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx lixxxxx xxxx xxxxx lixxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx )xxxx xxxx xxxxx PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Capacity Module: Final Vol.: 2 853 1311 117 509 ell 0 II 5 1 86l Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx I Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Saturation Flow Module: Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx Adjustment: 0.93 0.98 0.98 0.91 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.71 0.71 0.71 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Lanes: 1.00 0.98 0.02 1.00 0.99 0.01 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.83 0.17 1.00 II II it I Final Sat.: 1769 1829 29111736 1819 7I) 0 1900 0 11 1131 226 13571 Level Of Service Module: Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Analysis Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.47 0.47 0.07 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 LOS by Move: * * * * . * * * * * * * * **** **** Y Crit Moves: **** Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.69 0.69 0.10 0.78 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.09 Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.36 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.36 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0. SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Delay/Veh: 83.7 10.6 10.6 53.9 3.4 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.5 41.5 57. Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * AdjDel/Veh: 83.7 10.6 10.6 53.9 3.4 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.5 41.5 57.7 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx HCM2kAvg: 0 16 16 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 4 ApproachLOS: * * * * ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND S 7533EXAM.OUT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 5 of 6 411 411 411 411 411 III 411 III 411 411 411 411 411 111 411 fll 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 II/ 410 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 111 411 III 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 Existing AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:18 Page 11-1 Existing AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:18 Page 12-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Existing Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour Existing Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 72nd Ave (north)/SW Upper Boones Intersection #11 Sequoia Pkwy/SW Upper Boones ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Voi./Cap. (X): 0.673 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.625 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 24.1 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.7 Optimal Cycle: 65 Level Of Service: C Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SW 72nd Ave (north) SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Street Name: SW Sequoia Parkway SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T _ - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I I 11 II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ii• Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 I Volume Module: 11 11 11 I Volume Module: II 11 II Base Vol: 6 310 584 144 180 11 8 11 4 441 55 179 Base Vol: 5 6 5 192 7 72 80 638 13 17 635 626 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 6 310 584 144 180 11 8 11 4 441 55 179 Initial Bse: 5 6 5 192 7 72 80 638 13 17 635 626 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 PHF Volume: 6 327 615 152 190 12 8 12 4 465 58 189 PHF Volume: 5 6 5 196 7 74 82 651 13 17 648 639 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 6 327 615 152 190 12 8 12 4 465 58 189 Reduced Vol: 5 6 5 196 7 74 82 651 13 17 648 639 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: I 6 327 615 152 190 12 8 12 4 465 58 189 Final Vol.: 5 6 5 196 7 74 82 651 13 17 648 639 Saturation Flow Module: II II II I Saturation Flow ow Module: II II II I Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.88 0.93 0.79 0.84 0.88 0.88 0.84 0.85 0.85 0.89 0.83 0.83 Adjustment: 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.93 0.93 0.83 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.96 0.82 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.06 1.00 0.73 0.27 1.00 0.24 0.76 Lanes: 1.00 0.55 0.45 1.93 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1671 1759 1495 1597 1570 96 1597 1184 430 1688 370 1203 Final Sat.: 1702 911 759 3396 124 1568 1655 3235 66 1736 1828 1554 II II II I l II II II I Capacity y Anal ysis Module: Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.19 0.41 0.09 0.12 0.12 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.28 0.16 0.16 Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.01 0.35 0.41 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.28 0.68 0.14 0.40 0.40 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.41 0.41 0.41 Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.70 0.70 0.03 0.66 0.66 Volume/Cap: 0.30 0.67 0.60 0.67 0.30 0.30 0.38 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.38 0.38 Volume/Cap: 0.28 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.51 0.63 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.54 0. Delay/Veh: 56.7 35.9 9.5 48.5 20.4 20.4 59.6 106 105.8 26.7 21.1 21.1 Delay/Veh: 57.2 103 102.6 47.5 47.5 46.2 53.8 5.6 5.6 49.7 9.6 11. User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 56.7 35.9 9.5 48.5 20.4 20.4 59.6 106 105.8 26.7 21.1 21.1 AdjDel/Veh: 57.2 103 102.6 47.5 47.5 46.2 53.8 5.6 5.6 49.7 9.6 11.2 HCM2kAvg: 1 10 11 6 4 4 1 1 1 13 5 5 HCM2kAvg: 0 1 1 4 4 3 4 4 4 1 11 12 ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND a a a_ 7533EXAM.OUT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 6 of 6 • • • • • • • • • • • • 411 • • • • • • • 411 • • 411 • 411 • 411 411 411 410 411 411 411 411 • • 410 • 4 411 411 411 Existing PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:25 Page 1-1 Existing PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:26 Page 2-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone Tigard, Oregon Existing Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Existing Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour Scenario Report Impact Analysis Report Scenario: Existing PM Level Of Service Command: Existing PM Intersection Base Future Change Volume: Existing PM Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in Geometry: Exisiting PM LOS Veh C LOS Veh C Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee # 1 SW 74th Ave/SW Durham Road C 21.4 0.000 C 21.4 0.000 + 0.000 D/V Trip Generation: NULL # 2 SW Upper Boones/SW Durham Rd E 55.6 0.941 E 55.6 0.941 + 0.000 D/V Trip Distribution: NULL Paths: Default Paths # 3 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Studd's A 0.0 0.000 A 0.0 0.000 + 0.000 D/V Routes: Default Routes Configuration: Existing PM # 4 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Fanno Cr C 17.9 0.000 C 17.9 0.000 + 0.000 D/V # 5 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Pacific B 13.9 0.000 B 13.9 0.000 + 0.000 D/V # 6 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Tru-tree C 18.3 0.000 C 18.3 0.000 + 0.000 DAD # 7 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Tru-Gree C 18.1 0.000 C 18.1 0.000 + 0.000 D/V # 8 SW Upper Boones/72nd Ave (sout C 22.1 0.713 C 22.1 0.713 + 0.000 D/V # 10 72nd Ave (north)/SW Upper Boon C 31.0 0.777 C 31.0 0.777 + 0.000 D/V # 11 Sequoia Pkwy/SW Upper Boones C 23.2 0.636 C 23.2 0.636 + 0.000 D/V • Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND P v D_ 7533EXPM.OUT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 1 of'6 411 411 411 411 411 111 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 • 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 41! 411 411 Existing PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:26 Page 3-1 Existing PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:26 Page 4-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone Tigard, Oregon Existing Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Existing Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 SW 74th Ave/SW Durham Road Intersection #2 SW Upper Boones/SW Durham Rd ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: C( 21.4) Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.941 ******************************************************************************** Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 55.6 Street Name: SW 74th Ave SW Durham Road Optimal Cycle: 154 Level Of Service: E Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ******************************************************************************** Movement: L T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T R Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road SW Durham Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Control: I Stop Sign II Stop Sign II Uncontrolled II Uncontrolled I Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Control: I Protected II Protected II II Protected Protected I II II II 1 Rights: Include Include Include Include Volume Module: , Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base Vol: 0 0 0 29 0 29 16 841 0 0 1102 18 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 29 0 29 16 841 0 0 1102 18 Volume Module: II II II User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Base Vol: 280 307 10 33 437 438 300 299 298 13 413 11 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 . Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 31 0 31 17 885 0 0 1160 19 Initial Bse: 280 307 10 33 437 438 300 299 298 13 413 11 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 31 0 31 17 885 0II 0 1160 19 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 I II II PHF Volume: 290 317 10 34 452 453 310 309 308 13 427 11 Critical Gap Module: Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Reduced Vol: 290 317 10 34 452 273 310 309 308 13 427 11 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx lxxxxx xxxx xxxxx PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Capacity Module: Final Vol.: 290 317 10 34 452 273 310 309 308 13 427 111 Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2088 xxxx 1169 1179 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 58 xxxx 235 585 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Saturation F ow Module: Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 57 xxxx 235 585 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx ll0.54 xxxx 0.13110.03 xxxx xxxx llxxxx xxxx xxxx Adjustment: 0.93 0.98 0.98 0.93 0.98 0.83 0.93 0.98 0.83 0.94 0.99 0.99 Lanes: 1.00 0.97 0.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.03 Level Of Service Module: Final Sat.: 1769 1794 58111769 1862 1583111769 1862 1583111787 1825 491 Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 11.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Ana ysis Module: LOS by Move: * * * * * * B * * * * * Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.18 0.18 0.02 0.24 0.17 0.18 0.17 0.19 0.01 0.23 0.23 Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 281 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Green/Cycle: 0.17 0.39 0.39 0.04 0.26 0.26 0.19 0.42 0.42 0.02 0.25 0.2 SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.8 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.94 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.94 0.67 0.94 0.40 0.46 0.46 0.94 0.9 Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 21.4 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Delay/Veh: 85.0 27.6 27.6 60.4 70.6 44.2 82.6 24.6 25.7 69.9 71.7 71.7 Shared LOS: * * * * C * * * * * * * User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApproachDel: xxxxxx 21.4 xxxxxx xxxxxx AdjDel/Veh: 85.0 27.6 27.6 60.4 70.6 44.2 82.6 24.6 25.7 69.9 71.7 71.7 A roachLOS• * C * * HCM2kAvg: 15 9 9 2 21 10 16 8 8 1 20 20 Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND S * 5 7533EXPH.OUT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 2 of 6 Existing PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:26 Page 5-1 Existing PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:26 Page 6-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone Tigard, Oregon Existing Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Existing Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Studd's driveway Intersection #4 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Fanno Creek Place ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: Al 0.0] Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 17.9] ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Studd's driveway Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Fanno Creek Place Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - I - -R L - I - R Movement: L - I - R L - T - R L - T - R L - I - R Control: I Uncontrolled II Uncontrolled II Stop Sign II Stop Sign I Control: I Uncontrolled II Uncontrolled II I Stop Sign II Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 1 0 1 0 0 II 0 0 0 1 0 II 0 0 1! 0 0 II 0 0 0 0 0 1 Lanes: 1 1 0 1 0 0 II 0 0 0 1 0 II 0 0 1! 0 0 II 0 0 0 0 0 4E110 Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 610 0 0 900 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base Vol: 4 605 0 0 890 4 5 0 7 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 610 0 0 900 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 4 605 0 0 890 4 5 0 7 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 642 0 0 947 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Volume: 4 637 0 0 937 4 5 0 7 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 642 0 0 947 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: I 4 637 0II 0 937 4II 5 0 7II 0 0 0I Critical Gap'Module: II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx lixxxxx xxxx xxxxx lixxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:l 2.2 xxxx xxxxx lixxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3lxxxxx xxxx xxxxx l Capacity Module: Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cnflict Vol: 941 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1584 xxxx 939 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 724 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 121 xxxx 323 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 724 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 120 xxxx 323 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 255 0 xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx I II II II I I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Level Of Service Module: Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Queue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 10.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * * LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RTAlli Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 291 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx7lir Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 17.9 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * Shared LOS: * * * * * * * C * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 17.9 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * * * ApproachLOS: * Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND S A y a 7533EXPM.OUT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 3 of 6 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 • 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 Existing PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:26 Page 7-1 Existing PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:26 Page 8-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Existing Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Existing Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report • • 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Tru-Green (south) i Intersection Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Pacific Trust ************************************************************************************* ********************* ************************************************************* Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: B( 13.9] Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 18.3] ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Pacific Trust Business Center Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Tru-Green south driveway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: I Uncontrolled II Uncontrolled II Stop Sign II Stop Sign I Control: I Uncontrolled II Uncontrolled II II Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 10 0 0 1 0 II I 1 0 1 0 0 II I 0 0 0 0 0 II I 1 0 0 0 1 I Lanes: 11 0 1 0 0 II I 0 0 1 0 0 '1 0 0 1! 0 0 II I 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 605 3 9 885 0 0 0 0 5 0 43 Base Vol: 1 645 0 0 883 0 5 0 4 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 605 3 9 885 0 0 0 0 5 0 43 Initial Bse: 1 645 0 0 883 0 5 0 4 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: .0 637 3 9 932 0 0 0 0 5 0 45 PHF Volume: 1 679 0 0 929 0 5 0 4 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 637 3 9 932 0 0 0 0 5 0 45 Final Vol.: 1 679 0 0 929 0 5 0 4 0 0 0 I II II II I I II II it I ' Critical Gap Module: Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 3.5 xxxx 3.3 FollowUpTim:l 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3lxxxxx xxxx xxxxx I l I Capacity Module: Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 640 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1589 xxxx 638 Cnflict Vol: 929 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1611 xxxx 929 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 939 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 120 xxxx 480 Potent Cap.: 732 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 116 xxxx 327 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 939 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 119 xxxx 480 Move Cap.: 732 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 116 xxxx 327 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx 253 0 xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 252 0 xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx 0.09 Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx II ll II I 1 I I I I Level Of Service Module: Level Of Service Module: Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx 0.3 Queue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx StoppedMDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 19.6 xxxx 13.3 Stopped Del: 9.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx * * * * * * * * C * B LOS by Move: A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RIO Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 281 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 18.3 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * Shared LOS: * * * * * * * C * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.9 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 18.3 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * * B ApproachLOS: Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND S r 1 7533EXPM.WT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 4 of 6 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 • 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 III 411 411 411 411 411 Existing PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:26 Page 9-1 Existing PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:26 Page 10-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Existing Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Existing Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Tru-Green (north) Intersection #8 SW Upper Boones/72nd Ave (south) Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: CI 18.1] Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.713 ******************************************************************************** Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 22.1 Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Tru-Green north driveway Optimal Cycle: 61 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ******************************************************************************** Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road SW 72nd Avenue (south) I II II II I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 II 0 0 0 1 0 II 0 0 1! 0 0 II 0 0 0 0 0 1 Control: I Protected II II II Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Volume Module: Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base Vol: 1 645 0 0 873 1 5 0 4 0 0 0 Lanes: 11 0 0 1 0 II 1 0 0 1 0 II 0 0 1! 0 0 II 0 1 0 0 1� Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 1 645 0 0 873 1 5 0 4 0 0 0 Volume Module: User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Base Vol: 641 6 148 838 1 3 2 31 234 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Adj: 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 PHF Volume: 1 679 0 0 919 1 5 0 4 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 641 6 148 838 1 3 2 31 234 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Final Vol.: 1 679 0 0 919 1 5 0 4 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.9 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.9 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.9 0.97 I II II PHF Volume: 662 6 153 865 1 3 2 32 242 Critical Gap Module: Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Reduced Vol: 662 6 153 865 1 3 2 32 242 FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3lxxxxx xxxx xxxxx PCE Adj: 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 I II MLF Adj: 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Capacity Module: Final Vol.: 662 6 153 865 II 1 3 2 32 2421 Cnflict Vol: 920 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1601 xxxx 919 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 738 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 118 xxxx 331 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Saturation Flow Module: Move Cap.: 738 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 118 xxxx 331 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 254 0 xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx Adjustment: 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.97 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.74 1.00 0.80 Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx Lanes: 1.00 0.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.17 0.50 0.33 1.00 0.00 1.00 Level Of Service Module: II II II Final Sat.: 1900 1826 17111753 1845 0 297 890 593111410 0 15231 Queue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Analysis Module: Stopped Del: 9.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.09 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.16 LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Crit Moves: **** **** **** Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.53 0.53 0.13 0.66 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.20 Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 283 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.71 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.10 0.00 0.7 SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Delay/Veh: 0.0 19.3 19.3 50.1 13.1 0.0 30.4 30.4 30.4 31.1 0.0 42.9 Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 18.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Shared LOS: * * * * * * * C * * * * AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 19.3 19.3 50.1 13.1 0.0 30.4 30.4 30.4 31.1 0.0 42.9 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 18.1 xxxxxx HCM2kAvg: 0 16 16 6 18 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 ApproachLOS: * * C * ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND S 21. z 7533EXPM.OUT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 5 of 6 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Existing PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:26 Page 11-1 Existing PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:26 Page 12-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Existing Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Existing Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** *********************************************************************,r********** Intersection #10 72nd Ave (north)/SW Upper Boones Intersection #11 Sequoia Pkwy/SW Upper Boones ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.777 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.636 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 31.0 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 23.2 Optimal Cycle: 82 Level Of Service: C Optimal Cycle: 61 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SW 72nd Ave (north) SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Street Name: SW Sequoia Parkway SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R 1 Control: Protected 11 Protected II Protected 11 Protected I Control: I Split Phase II Split Phase II Protected II Protected 1 Rights: Ovl Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 11 11 11 1 1 11 II 11 Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 16 375 511 175 451 13 11 49 12 497 24 59 Base Vol: 11 12 24 466 3 92 63 710 1 7 462 446 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 16 375 511 175 451 13 11 49 12 497 24 59 Initial Bse: 11 12 24 466 3 92 63 710 1 7 462 446 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 . 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 17 391 532 182 470 14 11 51 13 518 25 61 PHF Volume: 12 13 27 519 3 102 70 790 1 8 514 496 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 17 391 532 182 470 14 11 51 13 518 25 61 Reduced Vol: 12 13 27 519 3 102 70 790 1 8 514 496 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 17 391 53211 182 470 1411 11 51 1311 518 25 61 Final Vol.: 12 13 2711 519 3 102 70 790 111 8 514 4961 Saturation Flow Module: Saturation Flow ow Module• Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.97 0.83 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.90 0.85 0.85 Adjustment: 0.90 0.85 0.85 0.93 0.93 0.83 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.91 0.96 0.82 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.03 1.00 0.80 0.20 1.00 0.29 0.71 Lanes: 1.00 0.33 0.67 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1753 1.845 1568111753 1786 51111753 1438 352111718 467 1148 Final Sat.: 11702 538 1075113494 22 1568111702 3399 5111736 1828 15541 Capacity Analysis Module: Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.21 0.34 0.10 0.26. 0.26 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.30 0.05 0.05 Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.15 0.15 0.07 0.04 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.28 0.32 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.27 0.66 0.13 0.39 0.39 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.39 0.39 0.39 Green/Cycle: 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.230.23 0.23 0.06 0.56 0.56 0.01 0.50 0.50 Volume/Cap: 0.67 0.78 0.51 0.78 0.67 0.67 0.14 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.14 0.14 Volume/Cap: 0.18 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.28 0.64 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.56 0.6 Decay/Veh: 102.5 41.1 9.2 56.9 27.5 27.5 46.5 83.6 83.6 32.6 20.0 20.0 Delay/Veh: 47.8 66.8 66.8 36.1 36.1 31.8 57.2 13.0 13.0 63.6 18.0 19.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 102.5 41.1 9.2 56.9 27.5 27.5 46.5 83.6 83.6 32.6 20.0 20.0 AdjDel/Veh: 47.8 66.8 66.8 36.1 36.1 31.8 57.2 13.0 13.0 63.6 18.0 19.9 HCM2kAvg: 2 13 9 8 13 13 0 4 4 16 2 2 HCM2kAvg: 1 2 2 8 8 3 3 7 7 1 11 12 ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND S 9 9 7533EXPM.OUT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 6 of 6 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ` 15.2.05 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE:] TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING SW Upper Booncs Fcrry Road at SW Durham Road in Tigard 141 BEAVERTON-TUALATIN 2000 - 2004 • C F F K G CLASS INT-TYP VEHICLE F '' 0 C 0 DATE COUNTY COMPNT CORN 1 RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH USE-TRLR MOVE A S JF.F.:. r L II R GAY CITY ALG TIP FIRST STREET DIRECT , LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST F 8 I K TINE URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (*LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V1 TYPE TO P1 TYPE SVRTY E I RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE •:-.'1.: H II 11 (I 0 0R 1.,7000 WASHINGTON 16 INTER CROSS p N CLR 5-1STOP 1 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 ;(41Y Sun TIGAF.0 U SW DURHAM RD NW UNKNOWN N DRY REAR PRVTE NW SE 00(1 103 PORTLAND UA 0 7.71 SW UPPER BOONES F 06 0 0 DAY INJ PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 27 M OR—Y (126 07 OR<25 2 NONE U STOP PRVTE NW SE 011 • PSNGR CA 1 DRV INJC 33 F OR—Y 000 OR<25 —'el I% II 'I N H 03/0022000 WASHINGTON 16 INTER CROSS F1 N CLR ABGL-OT 1 NONE 0 STRGHT • U4 •!T, wed TIGAF.D 0 SW DURHAM RD CFI TRF SIGNAL u DRY ANGL PRVTE NW SE 000 PORTLAND (IA 0 7.71 SW UPPER BOONES F 03 D N DUSK INJ - PSNGR CA 1 DRV INJC 26 M OR-Y 000 OR<25 2 PSN INJB 23 F 3 PIN INJC 26 M 4 PSN NO<5 00 M 2 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE NE SW PSNGR CA 1 DRV INJB 37 M OR-Y 020 038 04 • OR<25 • • • 00 • • • • 0 • • 00 • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • 0 • • • • 00 • • • • • • OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE:( :'I•S t- 9.IL:2005 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING SW Upper Booms Ferry Road at SW Durham Road in Tigard 152H1NA roll COUNTY :1TY OF TIE; 200(1 - 2004 C F R W ROAD- INT-T'YP CPASH VEHICLE ., ! (1 DATE CLASS CITY STREET CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-PEL OFF-RD WTHR TYPE USE /TRLR MOVE A S :E:F.I. E L H F DA'Y LIST FROM FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNCBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC- G E LICNS PED (NVE : I' - S L H TIME INTERSECT SECOND STREET LOCTN ((LANES) COIITL DRVWY LIGHT SEV VI TYPE TO PI TYPE IEIJ E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE 16 DURHAM RD INTER CROSS N S CLR ANGL-OT 1 NONE STRGH 093 01,27 e " I: 11 Il tl 06:"LUi 20119 000 00 _L'UII'F 5nn 0 UPPER BOONES FEF ''-H TRF SIGNAL pl DRY ANGL PRVTE NE SW • 1A 03 99 N DLIT PDO RUMOR CA 1 DRV NONE 18 F OR-Y 016,024 038 093 10,27 OR<25 2 POLC STRGH PUBLC NW SE ((00 00 FSOGR CA 1 DRV NONE 28 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 :'I!-,. 16 5(1 DURHAM RD INTER CROSS N H CLD S-ISTOP 1 NONE 0 STRGH 10 II D H I4 H TAl 2'i'?701 000 .!,:I1E Th. 0 SW UPPER BOONES F SW TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SW NE HA 116 0 H DAY PDO PSNGR CA • 1 DRV NONE 40 M OR-Y 026 10 • OR<25 . 2 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 00 M UNK 000 UNK 16 SW DURHAM RD INTER CROSS I1 W CLR S-1STOP 1 NONE 0 STRGH 07 (loSE1! N H N N U_;'_1.".Pill 000 I1..i;E^ Ned 0 SW UPPER BOONES F NW TRF SIGNAL pl DRY REAR PRVTE NW SE 12F 06 0 - N DAY PDO PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 45 '.9 OR-Y 026 07 OR<25 2 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NW SE 011 PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 57 M OR-Y 000 OR<25 _9"E" N H EI M N Tu 29 12001 16 SW DURHAM RC INTER 3-LEG N N CLR 0-ISTOP 1 NONE 0 BACK 10 !I.•!!E Tuc 0 SW UPPEP. BOONES F WW TRF SIGNAL N DRY HEAD PRVTE SE NW UNK 06 0 N DAY PDO TRUCK 1 DRV NONE 48 M OR-Y 014 017 10 OR<25 2 NOME U STOP PRVTE 11W SE 011 PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 00 M UNK 000 UNK ').Al.., ;l N la 04119/2003 16 5W DURHAM RD INTER CROSS N N CLR 5-1TURN 1 NONE STRGH 07 Fri 0 SW UPPER BOONES F NW TRF SIGNAL N CRY' REAR PRVTE NW SE 00(1 IL`II_c aq • 116 0 N DAWN PDO PSMGP. CA 1 DRV NONE 42 F OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 2 (NONE TURN- PRVTE NW SW 013 00 PSNGR CA 1 DP.V NONE 32 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE:_ 15._:'05 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING SW Upper Boonos Ferry Road at SW Durham Road in Tigard ',:SHINGroll 'JOUI1T', CITY OF (1G 2000 - 2004 F F s W • ROAD- INT-TYP CRASH VEHICLE I F 0 C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET • CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFF-RD WIHR TYPE USE iTRLP. MOVE A S L V H P DAY DIST FF0:i DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC- G E LICNS PED INVE FIRST STREET INVEST 1� 5 L K TIME INTERSECT SECOND STREET LOCTN MANES) CONTL DAVWY LIGHT SEV VI TYPE TO PI TYPE INJ E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE " '- U II II 01,21:2003 16 SW DURHAM RD INTER CROSS N N CLP ANGL-OT 1 NONE TURN- U1,OH rl)i True 0 SW UPPER BOONES F CN UNKNOWN N DPI TURN PRVTE NW SW 000 00 12P 04 0 H DAY P0O PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 17 M OR-Y 047,U01 017 01,08 OR<25 2 NONE STOP PRVTE SE NW 011 00 PSNGR CA 1 DP.V NONE 78 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 • • . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE:1 i C:4 P'1 8:15:2905 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING SW Upper Booncs Ferry Road at SW 72nd Avenue (north) in Tigard WASHINGTON COUNTY CITY OF TIG 2000 - 2004 F F. S W ROAD- INT-TYP CRASH VEHICLE E A U C O DATE 'CLASS CITY STREET CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFF-RD NINA TYPE USE /TRLR MOVE A S '':Ft - ; II F. CAI LIST FROM FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC- G E LICNS PEE INVEST 1 S L F. TINE INTERSECT SECOND STREET LOCTN (PLANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SE'V VI TYPE TO PI TYPE INJ E N RES LOC ERROR. 'ACT EVENT CAUSE -11 1 N N 05:0,/2003 lb SW UPPER. BOONES F INTER 2-LEG N N RAIN ANGL-ST 1 NONE 0 TURN- 01,08 I!.'IlE Wed 0 SW 72ND AVE N TRE' SIGNAL N WET TURN PRVTE NE N 001 00 7F 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 17 M OP.-Y 001,080 017 01,08 • OR<25 2 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N S - U12 00 PSNGR CA 1 DRV INJC 51 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 °- 11 N W N N 0p;27.'2000 16 Si UPPER. BOONES F INTER 3-LEG N N CIF S-1STOP 1 HONE 0 STRGH . 07 L.VE Tuc 0 SW 72ND AVE NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAP. PRVTE NE SW 000 -„ 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR. CA 1 DRV NONE 22 M OR.-U 026 07 OR>25 2 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 PSNGR. CA 1 DRV NONE 00 M UNK 000 UNK 1 ' II ll tl N N 11/222002 lb SW UPPER BOONES F INTER 3-LEG N N CLF S-1STOP 1 NONE U STRGH 07 IL,DE Fri 0 Si 72ND AVE NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAP. PRVTE NE SW 000 4F 06 0 N DUSK PDO PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 35 M OR-Y 026 07 OR<25 2 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 PSNGR CA 1 CRV NONE 19 F OR-Y 000 OR>25 •:1;:? lb SW UPPER BOONES F INTER 3-LEG N N CIR. S-)STOP 1 NONE U STRGH 01 II tl h1 II tl T4:25i 20112 l.,.IIF Th. 0 SW 72ND AVE S TRF SIGJJAL N DRY REAR PRVTE S N 000 01 7A 06 0 N DAY I14J PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 30 M OP-Y 026 038 01 OR<25 2 NONE 0 STOP • PRVTE S N 011 • PSNGR CA 1 DRV INJB 39 F OR-Y 000 OR<25 •-'11 II N N N N 0;:28:2001 1b SW OFFER BOONES F INTER 3-LEG N N CIF. ANGL-OT 1 NONE U TURN- 08 WOK Wed 0 SW. 72ND AVE SW UNKNOWN N DPY REAR PRVTE SE NE 018 SF 06 y DAY PDO PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 00 M UNE 001 08 UNK 2 NONE 0 STRGH PRVTE SW NE 000 PSNGR. CA 1 DRV NONE 22 :4 OR-Y 000 OR<25 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION - PAGE: -S!-' 9-)5'20.15 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING SW Upper Boones Ferry Road at SW 72nd Avenue (north) in Troard t)ASH!N,:TL•N COUNTY CITY OF T1i; 2000 - 2004 S C 1 F. S N ROAD- INT-TIP CRASH VEHICLE E : U U CAPE CLASS CITY STREET CHAP. (MEDIAN) IFJT-REL OFF-RD IITHP. TYPE USE JTRLP MOVE A S • Fe E L H R DAY LIST FROM FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNUBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC- G E LICNS PED C S L. K TI?JE INTERSECT LOCTN (PLANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SEV VI TYPE TO PI TYPE INJ E A RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE ,,,,--,., SECOND STREET - F! II F) (J N 08/08/2001 16 SW UPPER BOONES F INTER CROSS H N CLP. ANGL-ST 1 NONE 1 TURN- 08 'ITY Pled 0 SW 73ND AVE SW TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE SW N 000 8A 06 ' 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CA 1 DRY NONE OU U UNK 001 08 UNK 2 NONE 1 STOP • PRVTE SW NE 1111 SEMI TOW 1 DRV NONE 47 M OR-I 000 OR>25 - •.} II N II N 01,10.2000 15 SW UPPER. BOONES F INTER 3-LEG N H CLF S-OTHER 1 NONE 0 TURN- 11 _, ;IF; ?Ion 0 SW 72ND AVE CN UNKNOWN N WET TURN PRVTE N E 000 9P 04 D N DLIT PDO PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 56 F OR-Y 045 10 OR<25 2 NONE 0 TURN- PRVTE N E 000 PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 43 M OR-Y 000 OR<25 "I I: I) I) (I N (13;05:2001 16 SW UPPER BOONES F INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-OTHER 1 NONE 0 TURN- ON ;F1(!E Mon 0 SW 72ND AVE CFI UNKNOWN N DRY TURN PRVTE N NE 000 . 11F 04 0 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 38 M OP-Y 007 OR OR<25 2 NONE 0 TURN- PRVTE N NE 000 PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 60 M OR-Y 000 OR>25 ' II )( N 09;22/:092 Le UPPER BOONES FEF. INTER 3-LEG N N CLD S-)STOP 1 NONE 0 STRGH 013 07 I:.• FI Fu 0 '2ND AVE IJ TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N S 088 00 _F 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 26 F OTH-Y 026 088 07 N-RES 2 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N S 011 013 00 PSNGR CA 1 DRY HONE 39 F OR-I 000 000 I10• OR<25 013 • 2 PSFI ((005 03 F 000 000 00 3 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N S 022 00 PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 51 F OR-Y 000 U22 00 • OP<25 • ` I! II ll 08124,2003 16 UPPER BOONES FEB INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 1 NONE L1 STRGH 07 !I,;IE Stu) 0 72NC AVE NE TRF SIGNAL H DRY REAR PRVTE NE SW 088 00 IP 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGF CA 1 DRY NONE 36 M OTH-Y 026 088 01 N-RES 2 PSN NO<5 04 F 000 000 00 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE:3 '-(:==5 1 5.15.21105 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UIIIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING SW Upper Booncs Ferry Road at SW 72nd Avenue (north) in Tigard W AF IIING7'UN COUNTY CITY OF TIG 2(10(1 - 2004 C 1 F S Ni ROAD- INT-TIP CRASH VEHICLE E II C (' CATE CLASS CITY STREET CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFF-RD WTHF TYPE USE /TRLR MOVE A S :F,... E L G H F ItAi LIST FROM FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC- G E LICIIS FED (WEST F' C S L R TIME INTERSECT SECOND STREET LOCTN (ILANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT 5EV VI TYPE TO PI TYPE INJ E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE • 3 PSN NO<5 02 F 000 000 00 2 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 29 M OP-Y 000 000 UO OR<25 -'1- P If H 11.06.2003 10 UPPER BOONES FER. INTER 3-LEG N N CLR. S-1STOF 1 HONE U STFGH 07 O PE Thn H 72ND AVE E TRF SIGNAL N LEY REAR PRVTE E W 000 00 :P 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 56 F OR-Y 026 088 (170 OR<25 2 PSI( NO<5 01 F (100 000 00 _ 2 NONE U STOP PRUTE E W 011 00 PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 28 F OR-Y 000 000 U0 OR<25 .. 1... 119 15.201.4 10 UPPER BOONES FEE INTER 3-LEG t1 N CLR S-STRGH 1 NONE 0 STRGH 10 Wed 0 7250 AVE I TRF SIGNAL N DRY SS-0 PRVTE S N 000 00 SF 06 0 N CAI PDO PSHGF CA 1 CRV NONE 00 F UNR 031,1182 000 10 0R025 2 NONE U STOP PRVTE S N 011 00 PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 27 F OP-I 00O 000 00 OP.<25 l.:i4 0 11 N N H 12:03/2003 16 UPPER BOONES FER INTER 3-LEG pI N CLC 0-1TURN 1 NONE 0 STPGH 04 Tye 0 72ND AVE CW TRF SIGNAL Ni WET TURN PRVTE SW NE 088 00 OF 03 0 N CLIT INJ PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 21 F OR-Y 020 088 04 OR<25 2 HOME 0 TURN- PRVTE NE S - 00U 00 PSIIGR CA 1 DRV INJB 36 F OF-Y 000 000 00 OP.<25 ...:! 11 11 11 05:15,20112 16 UPPER BOONES FER INTER. 3-LEG N N( CLR S-OTHER 1 NONE TURN- 08 • HE Nen 0 72NC AVE CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE S NE 0U0 00 11F 04 99 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 18 M OR-Y 006 000 ON OP.<25 2 NONE TUP.II- PP.VTE S NE 0(1(1 (10 PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 1B F OR-Y 000 000 00 OP<25 ':1.9 II N N 01:'1:,2004 17 UPPER BOONES FER INTER 3-LEG NI N CLP. S-OTHER 1 NONE TURN- 13 1.20E Inc n '21(1 AVE CN TRF SIGNAL N CRY TURN PRVTE S SW 000 00 iF 04 99 N DAY PDO PSNGR. CA 1 DRV NONE 50 M OR-Y 045 000 13 OR<25 • OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION • PAGE:, -1`== S.!' 2:05 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING SW Upper Boones Ferry Road at SW 72nd Avenue (north) in Tigard )LASHINGroN COUNTY CITY OF TIC 2000 - 2004 C W ROAD- INT-TYP CRASH VEHICLE E R. I' C -I' LATE CLASS CITY STREET CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFF-RD WTHR TYPE USE iTP.LR ''(0'11 A S ._Fa. L Ii F: ',Ay DIST FRO'4 FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAP- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM FRTC- G E LICNS PED IIE,6sT - L 6 TINE INTERSECT SECOND STREET LOCT)1 MANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SEC VI TYPE TO PI TYPE INJ E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE • 2 NONE 1 TURN- • PRVTE S SW 000 00 SEMI TOW 1 DRV NONE 64 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 ---- p is N 09,118:2004 It UPPER BOONES FER INTER 3-LEG N N CIA 0-OTHER 1 NONE 0 TURN- 27.04 N.. cP 41cd 0 72ND AVE CM TRF SIGNAL N DPI TURN PRVTE N NE 000 00 2P 04 99 N DAY PDO PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 77 F OTH-Y 016,020 038 27,14 OR<25 • 2 NONE 0 TURN- . PFVTE S NE 000 00 PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 32 M OR-Y • 000 000 00 . OR<25 • i • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE:I ---- :•15'200': TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING SW Upper Boones Ferry Road at SW Scquioa Parkway in Tigard ..1..1!:1:11'.(1 COUNTY CITY uF TIG 2000 - 2004 S C . 0 Y: ROAD- 111T-T'YP CRASH VEHICLE F. 1' C 1' DATE CLASS CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-F.EL OFF-RD WTHP. TYPE USE /TRLR MOVE A S CITY STREET :ERN. '- •� G II F DAY CI5T FROM FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAP- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC- G E LICI•IS FED I'. I. K TIME INTERSECT SECOND STREET LOCTN ((LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SEV VI TYPE TO P1 TYPE INJ E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE (H1'Ep'I' •, !'-d`' I' 11 0 04:19;200_ IF SEQUOIA PKWY INTER 3-LEG N N CLP. ANGL-OT 1 NONE TURN- 02 '1.':H! Thu 0 UPPEP SCONES FER. ''CU TRF SIGNAL N CRY TURN PRVTE N SW 016 00 sp 01 94 N DAY PDO PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 27 M OR-C 028 000 02 O0.<25 2 NONE STRGH PRVTE NE SW 000 00 PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 61 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 '^` .. H it 11•?ci 2','04 16 SEQUOIA PKWY INTER. 3-LEG N N CLP. AFIGL-OT 1 NONE 0 TURN- 04 N.' z f• Set 0 UPPER BOONES FEP EN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE N NE 000 00 .'P 04 0 N CLIT PDO PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 47 M OR-1' 000 000 00 OR<25 2 NONE U STRGH PRVTE SW NE 000 00 PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 00 M UNK 020 000 04 • UNK „..,. 11 11 11 ti W llll%'_UU2 16 SW SEQUOIA PKY INTER 3-LEG N N RAIN S-1STOP 1 NONE U STRGH 01 I1:.IIF Mon 0 SW UPPEP. BOONES F NE TRF SIGFIAL N WET FEAR. PRVTE NE SW 001 01 7A 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 42 M OR-Y 026 01 OR<25 2 NONE U STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 PSNGR CA 1 DRV INJC 36 F OR-Y 000 OR<25 1_'1''^ I: II it N N 12,09:'2002 16 SW SEQUOIA PRY IFITER 3-LEG N N RAIN S-1STOP 1 NONE 0 STRGH 07 11:•IIE 'ton 0 SW UPPER BOONES F NE TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 7P 06 0 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 82 M OR-Y 026 07 • OR<25 2 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 34 M OR-Y 000 OR<25 . -C•1 II II I1 tl H T3%'(I;_'(Inll 16 SW SEQUOIA PRY INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-ISTOP I NONE 0 STRGH 07 I:..I;E Th. 0 SW UPPER BOONES F NE TRF SIGFIAL N DRY REAR. PRVTE SE NW 000 5P 09 1 N DAY PDO PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 44 M OR-1' 026 07 00<25 2 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE NW 011 PSNGR. CA 1 DRV NONE 23 M OF-Y 000 OR<25 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE:: :IS2S0 F'I5:2005 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING SW Upper Booncs Ferry Road at SW Scg00oa Parkway in Tigard 11001 IIG! I1 COUNTY CITY OF TIG 2o120 — 2004 U I F S W ROAD— INT—TIP CRASH VEHICLE F O LATE CLASS CITY STREET CHAR (MEDIAN) INT—F.EL OFF—RC WTHR TYPE USE /TRLR MOVE A S ,CFs. I; I. H R CA'i LIST FPO•d FICON STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF— RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC— G E LICKS FED INVEST I L F TIME INTERSECT SECOND STREET LOCTN (I LANES) CONTL CRVWY LIGHT SEV VC TYPE TO PI TYPE INJ E >• RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE IF SW SEQUOIA FRY INTEP. '—LEG H FI CIA AFIGL—OT 1 NONE 0 STRGH 04 i, tl N ll IJ Fr•2.1•=000 -Il�. Fer 0 SW UPPER BOONES F CS TPF SIGNAL H DRY TURN PPVTE NE SW III10 RP 01 0 N DUSK INJ PSNGP CA 1 DRV NONE 82 M OR—I 020 04 OR<25 • 2 NONE 0 TURN- PRVTE AI E 000 PSNGR CA 1 DRV INJA 31 F OR—Y 000 . OR<25 '`4_'• 2001 10 SW SEQUOIA PRY INTER 4—LEG Ft N CLR BIKE • 05 II II 14 II IJ 0^ __ 'I It :Ion 0 SW UFPEP BOONES F CS TRF SIGNAL 11 DRY TURN _P 04 • 0 N DAY INJ STRGH 1 BIK INJB 99 M 039 000 05 NE SW 1 NONE 0 TURN- PRVTE S SW 000 PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 66 F OR—Y 000 OR<25 ''I'. !I II H ('4.I9.2003 Il SW SEQUOIA FKY INTER CROSS N N CLR ANGL—OT 1 NONE U TURN— 04 Hu FA It 0 SW UPPER BOONES F CS TRF SIGNAL N CRY TURN PP.VTE N NE 000 00 4P 04 II H DAY PCO PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 38 M OR—Y 097 000 04 OR<25 2 NONE 0 STRGH PRVTE SW NE 000 00 PSNGR CA 1 DRV NONE 59 F OP.—Y 097 000 04 OR<25 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Appendix E • Year 2006 Background • Traffic Level-of-Service • Worksheets • • • • • •. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 411 • • • • 411 , • • 411 • 411 411 411 411 411 • 411 411 411 411 411 411 2006 Background AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:38 Page 1-1 2006 Background AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:38 Page 2-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2006 Background Traffic Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour 2006 Background Traffic Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour Scenario Report Impact Analysis Report Scenario: 2006 Background AM Level Of Service Command: Backgound AM Intersection Base Future Change Volume: Background AM Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in Geometry: Exisiting AM LOS Veh C LOS Veh C Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee # 1 SW 74th Ave/SW Durham Road A 8.8 0.000 A 8.9 0.000 + 0.110 D/V Trip Generation: NULL Trip Distribution: NULL # 2 SW Upper Boones/SW Durham Rd D 40.5 0.807 D 41.8 0.826 + 1.299 D/V Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes # 3 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Studd's B 15.0 0.000 C 15.0 0.000 + 0.059 D/V Configuration: Background AM # 4 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Fanno Cr C 15.4 0.000 C 15.4 0.000 + 0.060 D/V # 5 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Pacific C 15.6 0.000 C 15.7 0.000 + 0.031 D/V # 6 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Tru-Gree A 0.0 0.000 A 0.0 0.000 + 0.000 DO # 7 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Tru-Gree A 0.0 0.000 A 0.0 0.000 + 0.000 D/V # 8 SW Upper Boones/72nd Ave (sout B 14.6 0.692 B 15.4 0.703 + 0.764 D/V # 10 72nd Ave (north)/SW Upper Boon C 24.5 0.687 C 24.7 0.694 + 0.176 D/V # 11 Sequoia Pkwy/SW Upper Boones B 15.9 0.638 B 15.9 0.638 -0.006 D/V • Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND S s g. 7533BKAM.OUT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 1 of 6 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 410 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 Ili 411 411 • 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 III 111 111 111 111 111 111 411 411 411 III 2006 Background AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:38 Page 3-1 2006 Background AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:38 Page 4-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2006 Background Traffic Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour 2006 Background Traffic Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 SW 74th Ave/SW Durham Road Intersection #2 SW Upper Boones/SW Durham Rd ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Levet Of Service: Al 8.97 Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.826 ******************************************************************************** Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 41.8 Street Name: SW 74th Ave SW Durham Road Optimal Cycle: 100 Levet Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ******************************************************************************** Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road SW Durham Road 1 II II 1e 1 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Rights: Include Include Include Include I Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Control: Protected II Protected II Protected II Protected 1 I f1 11 II I Rights: Include Include Include Include Volume Module: Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base Vol: 10, 11 19 1172 504 49 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Growth Adj: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.0 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.02 I Initial Bse: 10 11 19 1195 514 50 Volume Module: II II II Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base Vol: 131 294 3 49 152 247 471 463 229 5 181 20 In-Process: 0 0 0 14 26 0 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Fut: 10 11 19 1209 540 50 Initial Bse: 134 300 3 50 155 252 480 472 234 5 185 20 User Adj: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.95 In-Process: 5 2 0 2 3 0 0 11 3 0 21 0 PHF Volume: 11 12 20 1273 569 53 Initial Fut: 139 302 3 52 158 252 480 483 237 5 206 20 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 11 12 20 1273 569 53 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Critical Gap Module: PHF Volume: 155 337 3 58 176 281 536 539 264 6 229 23 Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.3 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 3.5 xxxx 3.311 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Reduced Vol: 155 337 3 58 176 281 536 539 264 6 229 23 II ) PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Capacity Module: MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1909 xxxx 595 621 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Final Vol.: 155 337 3 58 176 28111 536 539 264 6 229 231 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 74 xxxx 499 955 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 73 xxxx 499 955 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Saturation Flow Module: Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.15 xxxx 0.02 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 I 11 II II I Adjustment: 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.91 0.96 0.82 0.93 0.98 0.83 0.89 0.92 0.92 Level Of Service Module: Lanes: 1.00 0.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.09 Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Final Sat.: 1753 1825 18111736 1828 1554111769 1862 1583111688 1595 1581 Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * * * * Capacity Analysis Module: Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.18 0.18 0.03 0.10 0.18 0.30 0.29 0.17 0.00 0.14 0.1� Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 952 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Green/Cycle: 0.11 0.28 0.28 0.05 0.22 0.22 0.37 0.53 0.53 0.01 0.17 0.17 Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 8.9 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.83 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.44 0.83 0.83 0.54 0.31 0.54 0.83 0.83 Shared LOS: * * * * A * * * * * * * Delay/Veh: 77.5 42.0 42.0 74.3 41.3 59.8 43.1 18.9 15.8 106.6 64.4 64.4 ApproachDel: xxxxxx 8.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApproachLOS: * A * * AdjDel/Veh: 77.5 42.0 42.0 74.3 41.3 59.8 43.1 18.9 15.8 106.6 64.4 64.4 HCM2kAvg: 8 12 12 3 6 12 21 13 5 1 11 11 Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND S + i . 7533BKAM.OUT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 2 of 6 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2006 Background AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:38 Page 5-1 2006 Background AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:38 Page 6-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone - Tigard, Oregon 2006 Background Traffic Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour 2006 Background Traffic Conditions Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Studd's driveway Intersection #4 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Fanno Creek Place ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: Cl 15.0] Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: Cl 15.4] ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Studd's driveway Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Fanno Creek Place Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement:. L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: I Uncontrolled II Uncontrolled II Stop Sign II Stop Sign I Control: I Uncontrolled II Uncontrolled II II Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 II I II I II I 1 1 I I II I II I 1 Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 792 440 12 9 8 Base Vol: 1 804 443 6 14 9 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.0 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.0 Initial Bse: 1 808 449 12 9 8 Initial Bse: 1 820 452 6 14 9 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 In-Process: 0 2 5 0 0 0 In-Process: 0 2 5 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 810 454 12 9 8 Initial Fut: 1 822 457 6 14 9 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.9 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.9 PHF Volume: 1 852 478 13 10 9 PHF Volume: 1 865 481 6 15 10 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 1 852 478 13 10 9 Final Vol.: 1 865 481 .6 15 10 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.5 xxxx 6.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.6 xxxx 3.4lxxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:l 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3lxxxxx xxxx xxxxx I l I Capacity Module: Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 491 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1339 xxxx 484 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cnflict Vol: 487 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1352 xxxx 484 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1062 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 162 xxxx 567 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1065 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 167 xxxx 587 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1062 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 162 xxxx 567 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1065 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 167 xxxx 587 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 290 0 xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 299 0 xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx llxxxx xxxx xxxx ll0.03 xxxx 0.02llxxxx xxxx xxxx) Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05 xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: Level Of Service Module: II II II l Queue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Queue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 8.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 8.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 377 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 370 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 15.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 15.4 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * C * * * * Shared LOS: A roachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 15.0 xxxxxx ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 15.4 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: PP Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND IS A 2 75338KAM.OUT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 3 of 6 • 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 • 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 2006 Background AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:38 Page 7-1 2006 Background AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:38 Page 8-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone Tigard, Oregon 2006 Background Traffic Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour 2006 Background Traffic Conditions Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Pacific Trust Intersection #6 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Tru-Green (south) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: Cl 15.7] Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: Al 0.0] ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Pacific Trust Business Center Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Tru-Green south driveway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: I L T R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - I - R L - T - R L - T R Control: Uncontrolled II Uncontrolled II Stop Sign II Stop Sign I Control: I Uncontrolled II Uncontrolled II Stop Sign II Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 821 37 449 9 Base Vol: 835 486 Growth Adj: 1.0 1.02 1.0 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.02 Growth Adj: 1.0 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Initial Bse: 837 38 458 9 Initial Bse: 852 496 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 In-Process: 2 0 5 0 In-Process: 2 5 Initial Fut: 839 38 463 9 Initial Fut: 854 501 User Adj: 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 User Adj: 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 PHF Adj: 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.95 PHF Adj: 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 PHF Volume: 884 40 487 10 PHF Volume: 899 527 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 Final Vol.: 884 40 487 10 Final Vol.: 899 527 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.2 Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx lixxxxx xxxx 3.3 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxxlixxxx xxxx xxxxx II l ) Capacity Module: I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 884 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 884 Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 757 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 348 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 757 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 348 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.03 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx llxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx llxxxx xxxx xxxx) Level Of Service Module: II II II l Level Of Service Module: Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.1 Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 10.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 15.7 Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx LOS by Move: * * * B * * * * * * * C LOS by Move: Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * Shared LOS: ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 15.7 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * * C ApproachLOS: Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND S 1 75338KAM.0UT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 4 of 6 2006 Background AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:38 Page 9-1 2006 Background AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:38 Page 10-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2006 Background Traffic Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour 2006 Background Traffic Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Tru-Green (north) Intersection #8 SW Upper Boones/72nd Ave (south) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level.Of Service: AC 0.0] Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.703 ******************************************************************************** Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.4 Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Tru-Green north driveway Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ******************************************************************************** Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road SW 72nd Avenue (south) 11 11 11 I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0. 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Control: I Protected II Protected II Permitted II Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Volume Module: II II II I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base Vol: 835 486 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.0 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.0 Initial Bse: 852 496 0 Volume Module: II ll II Added Vol: 0 0 0 Base Vol: 2 825 13 113 492 2 5 1 83 In-Process: 2 5 0 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Fut: 854 501 0 Initial Bse: 2 841 13 115 502 2 5 1 85 User Adj: 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.9 In-Process: 0 2 0 5 5 0 0 0 7 PHF Volume: 899 527 0 Initial Fut: 2 844 13 120 507 2 5 1 92 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 899 527 0 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.97 0.97 0.97 Critical Gap Module: PHF Volume: 2 872 14 124 524 2 5 1 95 Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Reduced Vol: 2 872 14 124 524 2 5 1 95 I PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Capacity Module: II II II P Y MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Final Vol.: 2 872 14 124 524 2 II 5 1 951 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Saturation F ow Module: Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Adjustment: 0.93 0.98 0.98 0.91 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.71 0.71 0.71 Lanes: 1.00 0.98 0.02 1:00 0.99 0.01 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.83 0.17 1.00 Level Of Service Module: II II II ( Final Sat.: 1769 1830 29111736 1819 7 0 1900 0111130 226 13571 Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Det:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Ana ysis Module: LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * Y Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.07 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.• Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Crit Moves: **** **** ** Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.68 0.68 0.10 0.78 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.10 SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.37 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.70 Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Delay/Veh: 86.1 11.7 11.7 55.4 3.6 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.9 40.9 59.0 Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx AdjDel/Veh: 86.1 11.7 11.7 55.4 3.6 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.9 40.9 59.0 ApproachLOS: * * * * HCMZkAvg: 0 17 17 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 4 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND t 7533BKAM.OUT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 5 of 6 ~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2006 Background AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:38 Page 11-1 2006 Background AM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:38 Page 12-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2006 Background Traffic Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour 2006 Background Traffic Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 72nd Ave (north)/SW Upper Boones Intersection #11 Sequoia Pkwy/SW Upper Boones ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.694 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.638 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 24.7 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.9 Optimal Cycle: 68 Level Of Service: C Optimal Cycle: 61 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SW 72nd Ave (north) SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Street Name: SW Sequoia Parkway SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: I Protected II Protected II Protected II Protected I Control: I Split Phase II Split Phase II Protected II Protected I Rights: Ovl Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to Lanes: 1 0 1 0- 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 I II II II I - I II II II Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 6 310 584 144 180 11 8 11 4 441 55 179 Base Vol: 5 6 5 192 7 72 80 638 13 17 635 626 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 6 316 596 147 184 11 8 11 4 450 56 183 Initial Bse: 5 6 5 196 7 73 82 651 13 17 648 639 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In-Process: 0 7 2 0 7 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 In-Process: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 Initial Fut: 6 323 598 147 191 11 8 11 4 453 56 183 Initial Fut: 5 6 5 196 7 73 82 653 13 17 651 639 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 PHF Volume: 6 340 630 155 201 12 9 12 4 477 59 192 PHF Volume: 5 6 5 200 7 75 83 666 14 18 664 652 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 6 340 630 155 201 12 9 12 4 477 59 192 Reduced Vol: 5 6 5 200 7 75 83 666 14 18 664 652 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 6 340 630 155 201 12 9 12 4 477 59 192 Final Vol.: 5 6 5 200 7 75 83 666 14 18 664 6521 Saturation Flow Module: Saturation Flow ow Module• Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.88 0.93 0.79 0.84 0.88 0.88 0.84 0.85 0.85 0.89 0.83 0.83 Adjustment: 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.93 0.93 0.83 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.96 0.82 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.06 1.00 0.73 0.27 1.00 0.24 0.76 Lanes: 1.00 0.55 0.45 1.93 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 11671 1759 1495111597 1575 93�I1597 1184 430111688 370 12031 11 II II Final Sat.: 1702 911 7593396 124 15681655 3235 661736 1828 15541 Capacity Analysis Module: Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.19 0.42 0.10 0.13 0.13 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.28 0.16 0.16 Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.21 0.21 0.01 0.36 0. **** **** **** **** Crit Moves: ** Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.28 0.69 0.14 0.41 0.41 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.41 0.41 0.41 Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.70 0.70 0.03 0.66 0.66 Volume/Cap: 0.31 0.69 0.61 0.69 0.31 0.31 0.39 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.39 0.39 Volume/Cap: 0.28 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.52 0.64 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.55 0.64 belay/Veh: 57.5 36.5 9.6 50.1 20.5 20.5 60.1 113 112.8 27.6 21.3 21.3 Delay/Veh: 57.5 107 106.7 48.0 48.0 46.5 54.7 5.7 5.7 49.8 9.7 11.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 57.5 36.5 9.6 50.1 20.5 20.5 60.1 113 112.8 27.6 21.3 21.3 AdjDel/Veh: 57.5 107 106.7 48.0 48.0 46.5 54.7 5.7 5.7 49.8 9.7 11.4 HCM2kAvg: 1 ' 11 11 6 4 4 1 1 1 14 6 6 HCM2kAvg: 0 1 1 4 4 3 4 4 4 1 11 12 ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND 1 75338KAM.OUT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 6 of 6 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2006 Background PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:44 Page 1-1 • 2006 Background PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:45 Page 2-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone Tigard, Oregon 2006 Background Traffic Condtions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour 2006 Background Traffic Condtions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour Scenario Report Impact Analysis Report Scenario: 2006 Background PM Level Of Service Command: Backgound PM Intersection Base Future Change Volume: Background PM Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in Geometry: Exisiting PM LOS Veh C LOS Veh C Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee # 1 SW 74th Ave/SW Durham Road C 22.2 0.000 D 34.2 0.000 +12.021 D/V Trip Generation: NULL Trip Distribution: NULL # 2 SW Upper Boones/SW Durham Rd E 66.4 1.011 E 66.8 1.017 + 0.404 D/V Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes # 3 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Studd's A 0.0 0.000 A 0.0 0.000 + 0.000 D/V Configuration: Background PM # 4 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Fanno Cr C 18.3 0.000 C 18.6 0.000 + 0.273 D/V # 5 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Pacific B 14.1 0.000 8 14.2 0.000 + 0.110 D/V # 6 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Tru-Gree C 18.6 0.000 C 18.9 0.000 + 0.268 DAIII1 # 7 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Tru-Gree C 18.5 0.000 C 18.7 0.000 + 0.265 D/V # 8 SW Upper Boones/72nd Ave (sout C 22.6 0.727 C 24.4 0.752 + 1.835 D/V # 10 72nd Ave (north)/SW Upper Boon C 31.7 0.792 C 32.8 0.813 + 1.067 D/V # 11 Sequoia Pkwy/SW Upper Boones C 23.5 0.648 C 23.5 0.648 + 0.009 D/V Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND 'S A 7533BKPM.OUT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 1 of 6 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2006 Background PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:45 Page 3-1 2006 Background PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:45 Page 4-1 Kittetson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2006 Background Traffic Condtions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour 2006 Background Traffic Condtions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 SW 74th Ave/SW Durham Road Intersection #2 SW Upper Boones/SW Durham Rd ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: D( 34.21 Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.017 ******************************************************************************** Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 66.8 Street Name: SW 74th Ave - SW Durham Road Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ******************************************************************************** Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road SW Durham Road I II 11 II 1 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Rights: Include Include Include Include II II Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Control: Protected Protected Protected I, Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Volume Module: I If II I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base Vol: 0 29 29 16 841 1102 18 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.0 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 0 30 30 16 858 1124 18 Volume Module: II ,I II Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base Vol: 280 307 10 33 437 438 300 299 298 13 413 11 In-Process: 0 0 0 0 41 79 0 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Fut: 0. 30 30 16 899 1203 18 Initial Bse: 286 313 10 34 446 447 306 305 304 13 421 11 User Adj: 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.95 In-Process: 15 7 0 5 10 0 0 33 8 0 64 0 PHF Volume: 0 31 31 17 946 1266 19 Initial Fut: 301 320 10 39 456 447 306 338 312 13 485 11 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 31 31 17 946 1266 19 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Critical Gap Module: PHF Volume: 311 331 11 40 471 462 316 350 323 14 502 12 Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Reduced Vol: 311 331 11 40 471 282 316 350 323 14 502 12 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Capacity Module: I II II ( MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2257 xxxx 1276 1286 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Final Vol.: 311 331 11I, 40 471 282 316 350 323 14 502 12' Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 45 xxxx 204 533 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 44 xxxx 204 533 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Saturation Flow Module: Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.70 xxxx 0.15 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1 11 Adjustment: 0.93 0.98 0.98 0.93 0.98 0.83 0.93 0.98 0.83 0.94 0.99 0.99 Level Of Service Module: Il I� I Lanes: 1.00 0.97 0.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.02 Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Final Sat.: 1769 1795 57II1769 1862 1583II1769 1862 1583II1787 1833 42I Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 12.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * B * * * * * Capacity Analysis Module: Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.02 0.25 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.01 0.27 0. Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 184 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 1.4 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Green/Cycle: 0.17 0.38 0.38 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.18 0.43 0.43 0.02 0.27 0.27 Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 34.2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 1.02 0.49 0.49 0.49 1.02 0.72 1.02 0.44 0.48 0.48 1.02 1.02 Shared LOS: * * * * D * * * * * * * Delay/Veh: 105.6 29.2 29.2 60.5 91.3 47.4 104.9 24.5 25.1 70.4 88.3 88.3 ApproachDel: xxxxxx 34.2 xxxxxx xxxxxx User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApproachLOS: * D * * AdjDel/Veh: 105.6 29.2 29.2 60.5 91.3 47.4 104.9 24.5 25.1 70.4 88.3 88:3 HCM2kAvg: 18 10 10 2 24 11 18 9 9 1 26 26 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND S A v b • 7533BKPM.oUT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 2 of 6 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2006 Background PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:45 Page 5-1 2006 Background PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:45 Page 6-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone Tigard, Oregon 2006 Background Traffic Condtions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour 2006 Background Traffic Condtions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Studd's driveway Intersection #4 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Fanno Creek Place ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: Al 0.0] Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: Cl 18.6] ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Studd's driveway Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Fanno Creek Place Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L - T - R L - T - R II L - T - R I Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: I Uncontrolled II Uncontrolled II Stop Sign Stop Sign Control: I Uncontrolled II Uncontrolled II Stop Sign II Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 II II II 1 1 II II II 1 Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 610 900 3 Base Vol: 4 605 890 4 5 7 Growth Adj: 1.0 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.0 Initial Bse: 622 918 3 Initial Bse: 4 617 908 4 5 7 Added Vol: 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 In-Process: 7 15 0 In-Process: 0 7 15 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 629 933 3 Initial Fut: 4 624 923 4 5 7 User Adj: 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 PHF Adj: 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.9 PHF Volume: 662 982 3 PHF Volume: 4 657 971 4 5 8 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 662 982 3 Final Vol.: 4 657 971 4 5 8 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx lixxxx xxxx xxxxx lixxxxx xxxx xxxxx lixxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx lixxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3lxxxxx xxxx xxxxx l Capacity Module: Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cnflict Vol: 976 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1639 xxxx 974 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 703 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 112 xxxx 308 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 703 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 111 xxxx 308 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 245 0 xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx llxxxx xxxx xxxx llxxxx xxxx xxxx llxxxx xxxx xxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx II II II I Level Of Service Module: Level Of Service Module: I Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Queue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS e Move:pped Del 10.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 278 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 18.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * Shared LOS: ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 18.6 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * ApproachLOS: Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND S 7533BKPM.OUT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 3 of 6 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2006 Background PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:45 Page 7-1 2006 Background PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:45 Page 8-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone - Tigard, Oregon 2006 Background Traffic Condtions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour 2006 Background Traffic Condtions Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Pacific Trust Intersection #6 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Tru-Green (south) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 14.2] Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: Cl 18.9] ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Pacific Trust Business Center Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Tru-Green south driveway Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T R Control: I Uncontrolled II Uncontrolled II Stop Sign II Stop Sign I Rights: I Uncontrolled II Uncontrolled II Stop Sign II Stop Rights: Include Include 0e Include Lanes: I 0 0 0 1 0 I I 1 0 1 0 0 II I 0 0 0 0 0 I I 1 0 0 0 1 1 Lanes: 1 1 0 1 0 0 II I 0 0 1 0 0 I I 0 0 1! 0 0 I I 0 0 0 0 0 1 Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 605 3 9 885 5 43 Base Vol: 1 645 883 5 4 Growth.Adj: 1.0 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.0 1.02 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.0 1.02 1.0 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.0 Initial Bse: 617 3 9 903 5 44 Initial Bse: 1 658 901 5 4 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 In-Process: 7 0 0 15 0 0 In-Process: 0 7 15 0 0 Initial Fut: 624 3 9 918 5 44 Initial Fut: 1 665 916 5 4 User Adj: 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 PHF Adj: 0.9 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.95 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.9 PHF Volume: 657 3 10 966 5 46 PHF Volume: 1 700 964 5 4 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 Final Vol.: 657 3 10 966 5 46 Final Vol.: 1 700 964 5 4 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx lixxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3lxxxxx xxxx xxxxx) Capacity Module: Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 660 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1644 xxxx 659 Cnflict Vol: 964 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1666 xxxx 964 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 923 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 111 xxxx 467 Potent Cap.: 710 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 107 xxxx 312 xxxx xxxx xxxxx , Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 923 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 110 xxxx 467 Move Cap.: 710 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 107 xxxx 312 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx 242 0 xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 242 0 xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx ll0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ll0.02 xxxx 0.101 Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ll0.02 xxxx 0.01llxxxx xxxx xxxx) Level Of Service Module: Level Of Service Module: Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx 0.3 Queue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 20.2 xxxx 13.5 Stopped Del: 10.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * C * 8 LOS by Move: B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - R Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 269 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 18.9 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * Shared LOS: A roachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 14.2 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 18.9 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * * B ApproachLOS: Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND 'S 9 a A 7533BKPM.OUT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 4 of 6 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2006 Background PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:45 Page 9-1 2006 Background PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:45 Page 10-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2006 Background Traffic Condtions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour 2006 Background Traffic Condtions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 RCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Tru-Green (north) Intersection #8 SW Upper Boones/72nd Ave (south) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: C( 18.7] Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.752 ******************************************************************************** Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 24.4 Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Tru-Green north driveway Optimal Cycle: 67 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ******************************************************************************** Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road SW 72nd Avenue (south) 1 11 11 11 1 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Control: I Protected II Protected II Permitted II Permitted I Rights: Include Include Include Include Volume Module: II II (I I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base Vol: 1 645 873 1 . 5 4 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.0 Initial Bse: 1 658 890 1 5 4 0 Volume Module: !I II II Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base Vol: 641 6 148 838 1 3 2 31 234 In-Process: 0 7 15 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.0 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.02 Initial Fut: 1 665 905 1 5 4 0 Initial Bse: 654 6 151 855 1 3 2 32 239 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 In-Process: 7 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 20 PHF Volume: 1 700 953 1 5 4 0 Initial Fut: 661 6 166 870 1 3 2 32 259 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Final Vol.: 1 700 953 1 5 4 0 PHF Adj: 0.9 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.9 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.9 0.97 Critical Gap Module: PHF Volume: 682 6 171 898 1 3 2 33 267 Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Reduced Vol: 682 6 171 898 1 3 2 33 267 ' II II II I PCE Adj: 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Capacity Module: MLF Adj: 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Cnflict Vol: 954 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1656 xxxx 954 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Final Vol.: 682 6 171 898 I� 1 3 2 33 2671 Potent Cap.: 716 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 109 xxxx 317 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 716 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 109 xxxx 317 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Saturation Flow Module: Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 244 0 xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx Adjustment: 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.97 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.74 1.00 0.80 I Lanes: 1.00 0.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.17 0.50 0.33 1.00 0.00 1.00 Level Of Service Module: II II II f Final Sat.: 1900 1826 17111753 1845 0 297 890 593111410 0 15231 Queue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 10.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Analysis Module: LOS by Move: B * * * * * * * * * * * Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.10 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02-0.00 0.1� Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RI LT - LTR - RT Crit Moves: **** **** *** Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 272 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.13 0.65 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.23 SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.75 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.10 0.00 0.75 Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 18.7 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Delay/Veh: 0.0 21.8 21.8 52.5 14.9 0.0 29.5 29.5 29.5 30.2 0.0 44.4 Shared LOS: * * * * * * * C * * * * User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 18.7 xxxxxx AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 21.8 21.8 52.5 14.9 0.0 29.5 29.5 29.5 30.2 0.0 44.4 ApproachLOS: * * C * HCM2kAvg: 0 17 17 7 20 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND S A i .g 7533BKPM.OUT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 5 of 6 111 111 111 411 411 111 Ill 111 fl, 411 411 111 411 411 411 411 III 411 411 411 111 Ell III fil 111 411 411 411 111 111 III 411 411 411 111 III 111 111 411 111 111 411 111 2006 Background PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:45 Page 11-1 2006 Background PM Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:23:45 Page 12-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2006 Background Traffic Condtions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour 2006 Background Traffic Condtions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 72nd Ave (north)/SW Upper Boones Intersection #11 Sequoia Pkwy/SW Upper Boones ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.813 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.648 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 32.8 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 23.5 Optimal Cycle: 90 Level Of Service: C Optimal Cycle: 62 Level Of Service:. C ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SW 72nd Ave (north) SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Street Name: SW Sequoia Parkway SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 I Volume Modul : II II e1 a Volume Module_ II II ee Base Vol: 16 375 511 175 451 13 11 49 12 497 24 59 Base Vol: 11 12 24 466 3 92 63 710 1 462 446 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 16 383 521 179 460 13 11 50 12 507 24 60 Initial Bse: 11 12 24 475 3 94 64 724 1 471 455 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In-Process: 0 20 7 0 20 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 In-Process: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 10 0 Initial Fut: 16 403 528 179 480 13 11 50 12 517 24 60 Initial Fut: 11 12 24 475 3 94 64 731 1 481 455 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.9 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 17 419 550 186 500 14 12 52 13 538 26 63 PHF Volume: 12 14 27 529 3 104 72 814 1 535 506 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 17 419 550 186 500 14 12 52 13 538 26 63 Reduced Vol: 12 14 27 529 3 104 72 814 1 535 506 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 17 419 550 186 500 14 12 52 13 538 25 63 Final Vol.: I 12 14 27 529 3 104 72 814 1 535 506 Saturation Flow Module: II 11 el I Saturation Flow Module: II II II I Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.97 0.83 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.90 0.85 0.85 Adjustment: 0.90 0.85 0.85 0.93 0.93 0.83 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.91 0.96 0.82 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.03 1.00 0.80 0.20 1.00 0.29 0.71 Lanes: 1.00 0.33 0.67 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1753 1845 1568 1753 1788 49 1753 1438 352 1718 467 1148 Final Sat.: 1702 538 1075 3494 22 1568 1702 3399 5 1736 1828 1554 II II II I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.23 0.35 0.11 0.28 0.28 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.31 0.05 0.05 .Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.15 0.15 0.07 0.04 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.29 0.3 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Crit Moves: **** **** **** *** Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.28 0.66 0.13 0.40 0.40 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.39 0.38 0.38 Green/Cycle: 0.04 0.04 '0.04 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.56 0.56 0.01 0.50 0.50 Volume/Cap: 0.71 0.81 0.53 0.81 0.71 0.71 0.14 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.14 0.14 Volume/Cap: 0.19 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.29 0.65 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.58 0.65 Delay/Veh: 114.7 43.1 9.2 61.8 28.5 28.5 46.5 92.2 92.2 35.1 20.2 20.2 Delay/Veh: 47.9 68.6 68.6 36.4 36.4 31.9 58.4 13.1 13.1 64.4 18.5 20.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 114.7 43.1 9.2 61.8 28.5 28.5 46.5 92.2 92.2 35.1 20.2 20.2 AdjDel/Veh: 47.9 68.6 68.6 36.4 36.4 31.9 58.4 13.1 13.1 64.4 18.5 20.3 HCM2kAvg: 2 14 9 8 14 14 0 4 4 18 2 2 HCM2kAvg: 1 2 2 9 9 3 3 7 7 1 12 12 ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND S + i a_ 7533BKPM.OUT 9-7-105 9:23a Page 6 of 6 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Appendix F • • Year 2006 Total Traffic • Level-of-Service • Worksheets • • • • • • • - • • • • • • wsam Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:28:19 Page 1-1 wsam Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:28:19 Page 2-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone Tigard, Oregon 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour 2006 Total Traffic Conditions Weekday AM Peak Hour Scenario Report Impact Analysis Report Scenario: wsam Level Of Service Command: wsam Intersection Base Future ' Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in Geometry: wstm actry: Difa site am LOS Veh C LOS Veh C t Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee # 1 SW 74th Ave/SW Durham Road E 35.8 0.000 E 40.6 0.000 + 4.719 D/V Trip Generation: AM Trip Distribution: with site # 2 SW Upper Boones/SW Durham Rd D 40.5 0.807 D 44.5 0.860 + 4.014 D/V Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes # 3 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Studd's B 15.0 0.000 C 15.6 0.000 + 0.659 D/V Configuration: wsam # 4 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Fanno Cr B 14.1 0.000 C 15.8 0.000 + 1.750 D/V # 5 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Pacific C 15.6 0.000 C 15.8 0.000 + 0.169 D/V # 8 SW Upper Boones/72nd Ave (sout B 14.6 0.692 B 15.8 0.704 + 1.150 D/O # 10 72nd Ave (north)/SW Upper Boon C 24.5 0.687 C 26.0 0.753 + 1.475 D/V # 11 Sequoia Pkwy/SW Upper Boones B 16.4 0.638 B 17.1 0.642 + 0.731 D/V Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND • A I i 7533WSAM.OUT 9-7-105 9:28a Page 1 of 5 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 • 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 wsam Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:28:19 Page 3-1 wsam Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:28:19 Page 4-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** **********************************************,r**********************,r*r.******** Intersection #1 SW 74th Ave/SW Durham Road Intersection #2 SW Upper Boones/SW Durham Rd ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: El 40.6] Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.860 ******************************************************************************** Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 44.5 Street Name: SW 74th Ave SW Durham Road Optimal Cycle: 111 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ******************************************************************************** Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road SW Durham Road II II II I Approach: . North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Rights: Include Include Include Include I II Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Control: Protected Protected ,I Protected ,I Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Volume Module: II +f II ( Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base Vol: 10 11 19 1172 504 49 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.0 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 10 11 19 1195 514 50 Volume Module: II II II Added Vol: 0 0 0 44 2 0 Base Vol: 131 294 3 49 152 247 471 463 229 5 181 20 In-Process: 0 0 0 14 26 0 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Fut: 10 11 19 1253 542 50 Initial Bse: 134 300 3 50 155 252 480 472 234 5 185 20 User Adj: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 Added Vol: 0 33 0 0 2 2 44 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.95 In-Process: 5 2 0 2 3 0 0 11 3 0 21 0 PHF Volume: 11 12 20 1319 571 53 Initial Fut: 139 335 3 52 160 254 524 483 237 5 206 20 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 11 12 20 1319 571 53 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Critical Gap Module: PHF Volume: 155 373 3 58 178 283 585 539 264 6 229 23 Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.3 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Reduced Vol: 155 373 3 58 178 283 585 539 264 6 229 23 I PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Capacity Module: II II II I MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1957 xxxx 597 623 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Final Vol.: 155 373 3 58 178 283 585 539 264 6 229 23) Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 69 xxxx 497 953 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 68 xxxx 497 953 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Saturation Flow Module: Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.16 xxxx 0.02 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.91 0.96 0.82 0.93 0.98 0.83 0.89 0.92 0.92 Level Of Service Module: I! II II I Lanes: 1.00 0.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.09 Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Final Sat.: 1753 1826 17II1736 1828 1554II1769 1862 1583II1688 1595 1581 Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * A * * * * Capacity Analysis Module: Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.10 0.18 0.33 0.29 0.17 0.00 0.14 0.• Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 123 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Green/Cycle: 0.10 0.27 0.27 0.04 0.21 0.21 0.38 0.55 0.55 0.01 0.17 0.17 Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 40.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.86 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.46 0.86 0.86 0.53 0.31 0.53 0.86 0.86 Shared LOS: * * * * E * * * * * * * Delay/Veh: 84.6 46.7 46.7 91.0 42.1 65.3 44.7 18.0 15.1 101.9 70.3 70.3 ApproachDel: xxxxxx 40.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApproachLOS: * E * * AdjDel/Veh: 84.6 46.7 46.7 91.0 42.1 65.3 44.7 18.0 15.1 101.9 70.3 70.3 HCM2kAvg: 8 14 14 4 6 13 23 13 5 1 12 12 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND 7533W5AM.OUT 9-7-105 9:28a Page 2 of 5 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 410 411 411 • 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411- 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 wsam Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:28:19 Page 5-1 wsam Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:28:19 Page 6-1 Kittetson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Studd's driveway Intersection #4 Upper Booties Ferry Rd/Fanno Creek Place ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 15.6] Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: CC 15.8] ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Studd's driveway Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Fanno Creek Place Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - I - R L - T - R L - I - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 792 440 12 9 Base Vol: 1 804 443 1 1 1 0 16 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.02 1.0 1.02 1.0 Initial Bse: 1 808 449 12 9 Initial Bse: 1 820 452 1 1 1 0 Added Vol: 0 77 4 0 0 Added Vol: 69 8 2 55 2 2 0 - In-Process: 0 2 5 0 0 In-Process: 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 887 458 12 9 Initial Fut: 70 830 459 56 3 3 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.95 0.9 PHF Volume: 1 934 482 13 10 PHF Volume: 74 874 -483 59 3 3 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 1 934 482 13 10 Final Vol.: 74 874 483 59 3 3 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.5 xxxx 6. xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.6 xxxx 3. xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3lxxxxx xxxx xxxxx' Capacity Module : II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 495 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1424 xxxx 488 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cnflict Vol: 542 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1534 xxxx 512 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1059 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 144 xxxx 564 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1017 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 130 xxxx 566 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1059 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 143 xxxx 564 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1017 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 122 xxxx 566 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 269 0 xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 242 0 xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx Volume/Cap: 0.07 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx II II II I I II II II Levet Of Service Module: Level Of Service Module: Queue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Queue: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 8.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 8.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 357 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 339 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpOel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 15.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 15.8 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * C * * * * Shared LOS: * * * * * * * C * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 15.6 xxxxxx ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 15.8 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C * ApproachLOS: * * C * Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND S 7533WSAM.OUT 9-7-105 9:28a Page 3 of 5 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 410 411 411 • 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 41! 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 . wsam Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:28:19 Page 7-1 wsam Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:28:19 Page 8-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Levet Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Pacific Trust Intersection #8 SW Upper Boones/72nd Ave (south) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: C( 15.8) Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.704 ******************************************************************************** Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.8 Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Pacific Trust Business Center Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ******************************************************************************** Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road SW 72nd Avenue (south) I II II II I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Rights: Include Include Include Include I II I II I Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted 1 II II II 1 Rights: Include Include Include Include Volume Module: Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base Vol: 821 37 449 9 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.0 1.02 1.0 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.02 Initial Bse: 837 38 458 9 Volume Module: II II Added Vol: 9 0 57 0 Base Vol: 2 825 13 113 492 2 0 0 0 5 1 83 In-Process: 2 0 5 0 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Fut: 848 38 520 9 Initial Bse: 2 841 13 115 502 2 0 0 0 5 1 85 User Adj: 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 Added Vol: 8 2 0 0 55 55 4 2 2 0 33 0 PHF Adj: 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.95 In-Process: 0 2 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 PHF Volume: 893 40 547 10 Initial Fut: 10 846 13 120 562 57 4 2 2 5 34 92 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 893 40 547 10 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Critical Gap Module: PHF Volume: 10 875 14 124 581 59 4 2 2 5 35 95 Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 Reduced Vol: 10 875 14 124 581 59 4 2 2 5 35 95 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Capacity Module: II II II MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 893 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 893 Final Vol.: 10 875 . 14 124 581 59 4 2 2 5 35 95 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 751 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 343 I I I II II I Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 751 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 343 Saturation Flow Module: Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.03 Adjustment: 0.93 0.98 0.98 0.91 0.95 0.95 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.81 0.81 0.71 Lanes: 1.00 0.98 0.02 1.00 0.91 0.09 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.13 0.87 1.00 Level Of Service Module: II II I Final Sat.: 1769 1830 29111736 1636 166 815 407 407 202 1345 13571 Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.1 Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 10.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 15.8 Capacity Analysis Module: LOS by Move: * * * B * * * * * * * C Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.48 0.48 0.07 0.36 0.36 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.**Al Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Crit Moves: **** **** * Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.68 0.68 0.10 0.77 0.77 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.46 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.46 0.46 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.26 0.26 0.70 Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Delay/Veh: 63.4 11.7 11.7 55.6 4.4 4.4 40.9 40.9 40.9 42.6 42.6 59.1 Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 15.8 AdjDel/Veh: 63.4 11.7 11.7 55.6 4.4 4.4 40.9 40.9 40.9 42.6 42.6 59.1 ApproachLOS: * * * C HCM2kAvg: 1 17 17 5 7 7 0 0 0 1 1 4 ******************************************************************************** • Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND S 1 a_ 7533WSAM.OUT 9-7-105 9:28a Page 4 of 5 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • wsam Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:28:19 Page 9-1 wsam Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:28:19 Page 10-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** *********************,r,r,r,r,r,r,r**,r*,Nt,r*,r,r*,r,r*,r,r*,r,hrrt,r,r,Mr,hr**,r,r,r,r,r**,r,r,r*,r***,r,►,r,r,r*** Intersection #10 72nd Ave (north)/SW Upper Boones Intersection #11 Sequoia Pkwy/SW Upper Boones ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.753 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.642. Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 26.0 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.1 Optimal Cycle: 77 Level Of Service: C Optimal Cycle: 62 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SW 72nd Ave (north) SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Street Name: SW Sequoia Parkway SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Ovi include include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ah Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 Volume Module. II II II I Volume Module: II II II IOW Base Vol: 6 310 584 144 180 11 11 4 441 55 179 Base Vol: 5 6 5 192 7 72 80 638 13 17 635 626 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 6 316 596 147 184 11 11 4 450 56 183 Initial Bse: 5 6 5 196 7 73 82 651 13 17 648 639 Added Vol: 0 2 4 0 33 0 0 0 77 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 22 1 3 0 0 55 0 In-Process: 0 7 2 0 7 8 0 0 3 0 0 In-Process: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 Initial Fut: 6 325 602 147 224 19 11 4 530 56 183 Initial Fut: 5 6 5 196 7 95 83 656 13 17 706 639 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 PHF Volume: 6 343 634 155 236 20 12 4 558 59 192 PHF Volume: 5 6 5 200 7 97 84 669 14 18 720 652 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , Reduced Vol: 6 343 634 155 236 20 12 4 558 59 192 Reduced Vol: 5 6 5 200 7 97 84 669 14 18 720 652 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: I 6 343 634 155 236 20 12 4 558 59 192 Final Vol.: I 5 6 5 200 7 97 84 669 14 18 720 652 Saturation Flow Module: II II II I Saturation Flow Module: II II II I Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.88 0.93 0.79 0.84 0.87 0.87 0.84 0.85 0.85 0.89 0.83 0.83 Adjustment: 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.93 0.93 0.83 0.87 0.92 0.78 0.91 0.96 0.82 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.08 1.00 0.73 0.27 1.00 0.24 0.76 Lanes: 1.00 0.55 0.45 1.93 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1671 1759 1495 1597 1530 131 1597 1184 430 1688 370 1203 Final Sat.: 1702 911 759 3396 124 1568 1655 1742 1481 1736 1828 1554 H II II . I II II II 1 Capacity Analysis Module: Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.19 0.42 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.33 0.16 0.16 Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.38 0.01 0.01 0.39 0.42 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.26 0.70 0.13 0.38 0.38 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.44 0.44 0.44 Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.71 0.71 0.02 0.65 0.65 Volume/Cap: 0.41 0.75 0.61 0.75 0.41 0.41 0.37 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.37 0.37 Volume/Cap: 0.29 0.64 0.64 0.61 0.61 0.64 0.64 0.54 0.01 0.54 0.60 0.64 Delay/Veh: 65.5 41.1 8.9 56.5 23.3 23.3 58.2 137 136.9 27.8 19.1 19.1 Delay/Veh: 57.6 109 108.6 46.5 46.5 52.5 55.0 7.1 4.1 65.3 10.8 11.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 65.5 41.1 8.9 56.5 23.3 23.3 58:2 137 136.9 27.8 19.1 19.1 AdjDel/Veh: 57.6 109 108.6 46.5 46.5 52.5 55.0 7.1 4.1 65.3 10.8 11.8 HCM2kAvg: 1 11 11 7 6 6 1 2 2 16 5 5 HCM2kAvg: 0 1 1 4 4 4 4 10 0 1 13 13 Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND S A v 9 2 7533WSAM.OUT 9-7-105 9:28a Page 5 of 5 F. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • wspm Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:22:54 Page 1-1 wspm Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:22:54 Page 2-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone Tigard, Oregon 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour 2006 Total Traffic Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour Scenario Report • Impact Analysis Report • Level Of Service Scenario: wspm Command: wspm Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in Volume: wspm LOS Veh C LOS Veh C Geometry: with site pm # 1 SW 74th Ave/SW Durham Road C 22.2 0.000 E 36.8 0.000 +14.609 D/V Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: PM Trip Distribution: with site # 2 SW Upper Boones/SW Durham Rd E 66.4 1.011 E 70.5 1.039 + 4.141 D/V Paths: Default Paths # 3 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Studd's A 0.0 0.000 A 0.0 0.000 + 0.000 D/V Routes: Default Routes Configuration: wspm # 4 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Fanno Cr C 18.0 0.000 C 23.6 0.000 + 5.624 D/V # 5 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Pacific B 14.1 0.000 B 14.7 0.000 + 0.546 D/V # 8 SW Upper Boones/72nd Ave (sout C 22.6 0.727 C 25.8 0.753 + 3.184 D/410 # 10 72nd Ave (north)/SW Upper Boon C 31.7 0.792 C 33.7 0.839 + 1.923 D/V # 11 Sequoia Pkwy/SW Upper Boones C 23.5 0.648 C 24.1 0.663 + 0.600 D/V • Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND S v 7533WSPM.OUT 9-7-105 9:22a Page 1 of 5 411 411 411 411 411 fll 411 111 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 Ell fll 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 (11 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 wspm Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:22:54 Page 3-1 wspm Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:22:54 Page 4-1 JCittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report . 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 SW 74th Ave/SW Durham Road Intersection #2 SW Upper Boones/SW Durham Rd ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: EC 36.8] Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (K): 1.039 ******************************************************************************** Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 70.5 Street Name: SW 74th Ave SW Durham Road Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ******************************************************************************** Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road SW Durham Road 1 11 11 11 1 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Rights: Include Include Include Include II 11 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Control: Protected Protected Protected I, Protected e Rights: Include Include Include Include Volume Module: I II II I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base Vol: 29 29 16 841 1102 18 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.0 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 30 30 16 858 1124 18 Volume Module: 11 el 11 Added Vol: 0 0 0 5 38 0 Base Vol: 280 307 10 33 437 438 300 299 298 13 413 11 In-Process: 0 0 0 41 79 0 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Fut: 30 30 16 904 1241 18 Initial Bse: 286 313 10 34 446 447 306 305 304 13 421 11 User Adj: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 Added Vol: 0 4 0 0 29 38 5 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.95 In-Process: 15 7 0 5 10 0 0 33 8 0 64 0 PHF Volume: 31 31 17 951 1306 19 Initial Fut: 301 324 10 39 485 485 311 338 312 13 485 11 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 31 31 17 951 1306 19 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Critical Gap Module: PHF Volume: 311 335 11 40 501 501 322 350 323 14 502 12 Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Reduced VoL: 311 335 11 40 501 321 322 350 323 14 502 12 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Capacity Module: II II II a MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2302 xxxx 1316 1326 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Final Vol.: 311 335 11 40 501 32111 322 350 323 14 502 121 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 42 xxxx 193 514 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 41 xxxx 193 514 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Saturation Flow Module: Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.75 xxxx 0.16 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 I Adjustment: 0.93 0.98 0.98 0.93 0.98 0.83 0.93 0.98 0.83 0.94 0.99 0.99 Level Of Service Module: II II le a Lanes: 1.00 0.97 0.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.02 Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Final Sat.: 1769 1796 57111769 1862 1583111769 1862 1583111787 1833 421 Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 12.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I LOS by Move: * * * * * * B * * * * * Capacity Analysis Module: Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.02 0.27 0.20 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.01 0.27 0.24111 Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 174 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Shared0ueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 1.5 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Green/Cycle: 0.17 0.38 0.38 0.05 0.26 0.26 0.17 0.42 0.42 0.02 0.26 0.26 Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 36.8 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 1.04 0.49 0.49 0.49 1.04 0.78 1.04 0.44 0.48 0.48 1.04 1.04 Shared LOS: * * * * E * * * * * * * Delay/Veh: 112.4 28.7 28.7 60.4 95.9 50.8 111.2 25.0 25.7 70.9 95.2 95.2 ApproachDel: xxxxxx 36.8 xxxxxx xxxxxx User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApproachLOS: * E * * AdjDel/Veh: 112.4 28.7 28.7 60.4 95.9 50.8 111.2 25.0 25.7 70.9 95.2 95.2 HCM2kAvg: 18 10 10 2 26 13 19 9 9 1 26 26 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND S A v a N 7533WSPM.OUT 9-7-105 9:22a Page 2 of 5 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 • 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 • 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411- wspm Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:22:54 Page 5-1 wspm Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:22:54 Page 6-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone Tigard, Oregon 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour 2006 Total Traffic Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Studd's driveway Intersection #4 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Fanno Creek Place ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: A( 0.0) Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: Cl 23.6] ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Studd's driveway Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Fanno Creek Place Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T R Control: I Uncontrolled II Uncontrolled II Stop Sign II Stop Sign Control: I Uncontrolled II Uncontrolled II Stop Sign II Stop Sign I Rights: Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 II I 0 0 0 0 0 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I (1 jilk Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 610 900 3 Base Vol: 1 605 890 1 1 1 IIIP Growth Adj: 1.0 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.0 Initial Bse: 622 918 3 Initial Bse: 1 617 908 1 1 1 Added Vol: 9 67 0 Added Vol: 8 1 33 6 29 33 In-Process: 7 15 0 In-Process: 1 7 15 0 0 4 Initial Fut: 638 1000 3 Initial Fut: 10 625 956 7 30 38 User Adj: 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 PHF Adj: 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.9 PHF Volume: 672 1053 3 - PHF Volume: 11 658 1006 7 32 40 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 672 1053 3 Final Vol.: 11 658 1006 7 32 40 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gap Module: . Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx l xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx II xxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3lxxxxx xxxx xxxxx) Capacity Module : II l I Capacity Module: l le: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cnflict Vol: 1013 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1689 xxxx 1010 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 680 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 104 xxxx 294 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 680 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 103 xxxx 294 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 235 0 xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx II xxxx xxxx llxxxx xxxx xxxx llxxxx xxxx xxxx) Volume/Cap: 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.13 xxxx 0.14 xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: Level Of Service Module: II II II I Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Queue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 10.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * * LOS by Move: B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 264 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 1.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 23.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * Shared LOS: ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 23.6 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: ApproachLOS: Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND • S A 2 7533WSPM.OUT 9-7-105 9:22a Page 3 of 5 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • wspm Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:22:54 Page 7-1 wspm Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:22:54 Page 8-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Pacific Trust Intersection #8 SW Upper Boones/72nd Ave (south) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: BI 14.7) Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.753 ******************************************************************************** Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 25.8 Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Pacific Trust Business Center Optimal Cycle: 68 Levet Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ******************************************************************************** Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road SW 72nd Avenue (south) II II II 1 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Rights: Include Include Include Include I I+ 'I Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted 1 II II II ( Rights: Include Include Include Include Volume Module: Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base Vol: 605 3 9 885 5 43 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.0 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.02 1.0 1.02 11 11 11 Initial Bse: 617 3 9 903 5 44 Volume Module: Added Vol: 29 0 0 40 0 0 Base Vol: 0 641 6 148 838 0 1 3 2 31 0 234 In-Process: 7 0 0 15 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Fut: 653 3 9 958 5 44 Initial Bse: 0 654 6 151 855 0 1 3 2 32 0 239 User Adj: 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.00 Added Vol: 1 29 0 0 6 6 67 29 33 0 4 0 PHF Adj: 0.9 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.9 0.95 PasserByVol: 0 7 0 15 15 1 5 0 0 0 0 20 PHF Volume: 687 3 10 1008 5 46 Initial Fut: 1 690 6 166 876 7 73 32 35 32 4 259 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 687 3 10 1008 5 46 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Critical Gap Module: PHF Volume: 1 712 6 171 904 7 75 33 36 33 4 267 Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 Reduced Vol: 1 712 6 171 904 7 75 33 36 33 4 267 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Capacity Module: I I II I MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 691 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1717 xxxx 689 Final Vol.: 1 712 6 171 904 7 75 33 36 33 4 2671 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 899 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 100 xxxx 449 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 899 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 99 xxxx 449 Saturation Flow Module: Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 0 xxxxx 230 0 xxxxx Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx 0.10 Adjustment: 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.71 0.71 0.80- Lanes: 1.00 0.99 0.01 1.00 0.99 0.01 0.52 0.23 0.25 0.89 0.11 1.00 Level Of Service Module: I II II I Final Sat.: 1753 1827 16 1753 1828 15 788 346 378 1191 151 1523 Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx 0.3 1 1 Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 21.0 xxxx 13.9 Capacity Analysis Module: LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * C * B Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.39 0.39 0.10 0.49 0.49 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.03 0.1 Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Crit Moves: **** **** **** Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.13 0.65 0.65 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.76 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.76 0.76 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.12 0.12 0.75 Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Delay/Veh: 537.6 22.5 22.5 55.2 15.4 15.4 33.3 33.3 33.3 30.4 30.4 44.5 Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 14.7 AdjDel/Veh: 537.6 22.5 22.5 55.2 15.4 15.4 33.3 33.3 33.3 30.4 30.4 44.5 ApproachLOS: * * * B HCM2kAvg: 0 19 19 7 21 21 5 5 5 1 1 9 Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND V a 7533WSPM.OUT 9-7-105 9:22a Page 4 of 5 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • wspm Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:22:54 Page 9-1 wspm Wed Sep 7, 2005 09:22:54 Page 10-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report • 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 72nd Ave (north)/SW Upper Boones Intersection #11 Sequoia Pkwy/SW Upper Boones ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.839 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): • 0.663 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 33.7 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 24.1 Optimal Cycle: 96 Level Of Service: C Optimal Cycle: 64 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SW 72nd Ave (north) SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Street Name: SW Sequoia Parkway SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 II II 11 I I II II II Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 16 375 511 175 451 13 11 49 12 497 24 59 Base Vol: 11 12 24 466 3 92 63 710 1 7 462 446 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 16 383 521 179 460 13 11 50 12 507 24 60 Initial Bse: 11 12 24 475 3 94 64 724 1 7 471 455 Added Vol: 0 29 67 0 4 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 3 19 48 0 0 6 0 In-Process: 0 20 7 0 20 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 In-Process: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 10 0 Initial Fut: 16 432 595 179 484 13 11 50 12 526 24 60 Initial Fut: 11 12 24 475 3 97 83 779 1 7 487 455 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 17 449 620 186 504 14 12 52 13 548 26 63 PHF Volume: 12 14 27 529 3 108 93 867 1 8 542 506 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0. 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced.Vol: 17 449 620 186 504 14 12 52 13 548 26 63 Reduced Vol: 12 14 27 529 3 108 93 867 1 8 542 506 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 17 449 620 186 504 14 12 52 13 548 25 63 Final Vol.: 12 14 27 529 3 108 93 867 1 8 542 506 Saturation Flow Module: II II II I Saturation Flow ow Module: II II II Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.97 0.83 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.90 0.85 0.85 Adjustment: 0.90 0.85 0.85 0.93 0.93 0.83 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.91 0.96 0.82 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.03 1.00 0.80 0.20 1.00 0.29 0.71 Lanes: 1.00 0.33 0.67 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 11753 1845 1568 1753 1789 49 1753 1438 352 1718 467 1148 Final Sat.: 11702 538 1075 3494 22 1568 1702 3400 4 1736 1828 1554 Capacity Analysis Module: II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: II II II I Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.24 0.40 0.11 0.28 0.28 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.32 0.05 0.05 Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.15 0.15 0.07 0.05 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.30 0.3 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Crit Moves: **** **** **** *** Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.29 0.67 0.13 0.40 0.40 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.38 0.38 0.38 Green/Cycle: 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.08 0.56 0.56 0.01 0.49 0.49 Volume/Cap: 0.70 0.84 0.59 0.84 0.70 0.70 0.14 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.14 0.14 Volume/Cap: 0.19 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.30 0.66 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.60 0.66 Decay/Veh: 112.4 44.5 9.9 66.4 27.8 27.8 46.6 99.8 99.8 37.7 20.6 20.6 Delay/Veh: 48.0 71.3 71.3 37.2 37.2 32.4 55.9 13.0 13.0 66.6 19.6 21.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 112.4 44.5 9.9 66.4 27.8 27.8 46.6 99.8 99.8 37.7 20.6 20.6 AdjDel/Veh: 48.0 71.3 71.3 37.2 37.2 32.4 55.9 13.0 13.0 66.6 19.6 21.4 HCM2kAvg: 2 16 11 8 14 14 0 4 4 19 2 2 HCM2kAvg: 1 2 2 9 9 3 4 8 8 1 12 12 ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND S 9 S 7533WSPM.OUT 9-7-105 9:22a Page 5 of 5 II • • • • • • MITIG8 - wsam Thu Sep 8, 2005 08:03:58 Page 1-1 • Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon • 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday AM Peak Hour • Level Of Service Computation Report • 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** • Intersection #2 SW Upper Boones/SW Durham Rd (MITIGATED) ******************************************************************************** • Cycle (sec) : 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.822 Loss Time (sec) : 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 37.0 • Optimal Cycle: 99 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** • Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road SW Durham Road • Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R • 1 11 11 11 Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected • Rights: Include Ovl Include Include • Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 • 1 li il 11 Volume Module: • Base Vol: 131 294 3 49 152 247 471 463 229 5 181 20 Growth Adj : 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 • Initial Bse: 134 300 3 50 155 252 480 472 234 5 185 20 • Added Vol: 0 33 0 0 2 2 44 0 0 0 0 0 In-Process: 5 2 0 2 3 0 0 11 3 0 21 0 • Initial Fut: 139 335 3 52 160 254 524 483 237 5 206 20 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • PHF Adj : 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 155 374 3 58 179 283 585 539 264 6 229 23 • Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Reduced Vol: 155 374 3 58 179 283 585 539 264 6 229 23 PCE Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. : 155 374 3 58 179 283 585 539 264 6 229 23 • 1 II II II 1 Saturation Flow Module: • Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 • Adjustment: 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.82 0.93 0.98 0.83 0.89 0.92 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 0.99 0.01 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.09 • Final Sat. : 1753 1826 17 1736 3473 1554 1769 1862 1583 1688 1595 158 11 11 11 • Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.05 0.18 0.33 0.29 0.17 0.00 0.14 0.14 • Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** • Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.25 0.25 0.04 0.11 0.51 0.40 0.57 0.57 0.01 0.17 0.17 Volume/Cap: 0.48 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.48 0.36 0.82 0.51 0.29 0.51 0.82 0.82 • Delay/Veh: 45.1 53.9 53.9 108.5 51.5 18.0 39.6 16.0 13.5 92.7 63.8 63.8 User DelAdj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • AdjDel/Veh: 45.1 53.9 53.9 108.5 51.5 18.0 39.6 16.0 13.5 92.7 63.8 63.8 HCM2kAvg: 6 15 15 4 4 6 22 12 5 1 11 11 • • Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND • • • • • • • 0 • • • MITIG8 - wspm Thu Sep 8, 2005 08:01:22 Page 1-1 • Kittelson & Associates, Inc.---- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone Tigard, Oregon • 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour • Level Of Service Computation Report • 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** . Intersection #2 SW Upper Boones/SW Durham Rd (MITIGATED) ******************************************************************************** • Cycle (sec) : 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.892 Loss Time (sec) : 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 52.0 • Optimal Cycle: 125 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** • Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road SW Durham Road . Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L T R L T R L T R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected • Rights: Include Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1. 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 . 1 II II II Volume Module: • Base Vol: 280 307 10 33 437 438 300 299 298 13 413 11 Growth Adj : 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 41 Initial Bse: 286 313 10 34 446 447 306 305 304 13 421 11 Added Vol: 0 4 0 0 29 38 5 0 0 0 0 0 • In-Process: 15 7 0 5 10 0 0 33 8 0 64 0 41 Initial Fut: 301 324 10 39 485 485 311 338 312 13 485 11 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.9'7 PHF Volume: 311 335 11 40 501 501 322 350 323 14 502 12 • Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 311 335 11 40 501 471 322 350 323 14 502 12 • PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. : 311 335 11 40 501 471 322 350 323 14 502 12 • 1 II II II 1 Saturation Flow Module: 41 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.93 0.98 0.98 0.93 0.93 0.83 0.93 0.98 0.83 0.94 0.99 0.99 Lanes: 1.00 0.97 0.03 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.02 41 Final Sat. : 1769 1796 57 1769 3538 1583 1769 1862 1583 1787 1833 42 11 11 11 1 • Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.02 0.14 0.30 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.01 0.27 0.27 • Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.20 0.32 0.32 0.04 0.23 0.53 0.30 0.39 0.39 0.02 0.24 0.24 • Volume/Cap: 0.88 0.58 0.58 0.57 0.62 0.56 0.61 0.48 0.52 0.38 1.14 1.14 • Delay/Veh: 67.9 35.6 35.6 66.8 42.9 19.7 37.9 28.0 28.9 64.8 133 132.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 AdjDel/Veh: 67.9 35.6 35.6 66.8 42.9 16.8 37.9 28.0 28.9 64.8 133 132.6 HCM2kAvg: 15 11 11 2 9 12 11 10 9 1 30 30 • ******************************************************************************** • • Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND • • • • 41 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Appendix G • Conceptual Mitigation Plan • for SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Durham Road • Intersection • • • • • • • • • • • • • ................................................................. ............................. ..............................) A , : P • , . 4)4)......- 44 4.+^, " "PPP+.• . .3 ".41) - - - • . A •";.4-- : -'• .4 A • - • .. .)0•44,04),, ,, .144 •, • ,. i ,$.440: ,or,.. . i, ,t .4. , . .• i • •• . -44N ; 4.4:4 •,...•'4.;44 444' •..44447/44; 444444;•••;• • 1 • 44442'4, • ; ••• • A° • 4, ."' . • ., .'4,4 44'4: ''.•4..r.4. . k•kkk4 • .• J... .i. '.. .. :„....... • k -1 ... kJ., ......,..• 'T?.,,t .....k.:Iikk,:k;7*/......:k.::,, .:/,...J. f . ..,„. . PA +0.00). A 0. : „" „ AA •-prillik.. AP t.„.. 4, • . .. : : tp . , 4, • „ • .• (3• ."t3.344.43:.•A.0 ° 3 ••• . 3+: ' . :•::0 : fi). P;P:AP.41 . t.6 • . 3. t, t,,r) 4'4". t!'tt... ' .4..t:44 4). •P•Up::+4.+4.0,0P. ArT):40.4;APA. )043 • . . 4 -.4'0'•, . , .. P 0 • 4 n'...!, ' .++.4.' ....<kti:41,4,....>...,::-...7....,.." • • A • / ..A - .'' • 'AA.+AA.,,•;74-•••• •• rt.,4*-•••••••••44,4•44•••••1•••••• • - • •• ••• •••:..„••74,...0* . •4!0 .... ..4;9 •'.;•.....,...i....44.9 1 4-:-,'' ' . '. ... :..1.• .:.' • '1/4.:0.1.i0.0, ... ' ".......''';'," 4 1 : ......PI"+"': • 4 : 4:4: : .. 4 '4 V..1••tii=......"..:. .'''...144'7. . • 4 . - 4' • . , •-)... - ... .**....) >4>i..4.i 41•**.. 4 44 :4, , .14::....:,:44:44; 44.-,,... ...,..,4 , .417 4.144.:444444:•'•"„ • t 4,>■• •., .. 4•./ •4'...4 ,„>•• 4.4,4>4"7./ ' '• -... 424 • • . 4/ •"4, •' '''.; 04 • . . • 44444/44.••./..• 1 • .4,4; 4,4444 •• 447 7 . ,„ 4 04 • : ; ., . ,it 4:4 • .4 4 , r--4' • . •,c, , , 4 . . , . :4. 4''"• , 0.4' ' 4;4.-P.( , ' . A .„ .0444.. :: „• .:• - - .••• :dr.rt• • : . . . „, ,,,,,,,, ,-, • . _144 • • ...: :......i . i".... • ... 4°.i,'',',6,„ -'''''''' ° '.• :1:: 4 MI : .• .00,4 •, • • ••:A., : .• .••• •• 04- . --.1' • .• .• •• . . . , „ _,_ . .• ....• : , ..• . ..“ .. - •.• Az .. . . • <.. i • • 'Pl. • '''et .I. . 1' • '..1 ''- '.:0 • I •••:......i...i •ii , . • . .., . . -A -. •.„ „ *-- • „••• .„ :„..4„ •-• - 4•• • f..., ... , 4-ter rrttitt tr:,:• •- ::r. ,, --It.' • .....,,t , • *•:' ••-„:„,-t • . ••,„ 4: ,4,, .. ••• 4 1 4,444-4, ,• 4*.-4 ..:: . • j•....0 .•.., •• ' • -- ... . .i..A t„A"- •A.,.. , . • i I ce- e• • ri 1 -, • i, •••••/. • ,• •,:• •rfri t•.° •---'".• •, :::, • , ..4.'-- 1 ''. - , I, . '.il tf,.,./PP; .A . . •:0; ..°4 ••()PT).; --„f•4 .4. e I' • i•.,--„,i0.,•.< „:.,•A • j.•:„,„ „-,:t44,4 .1,4. , „ ,„ „„ . ., /.. .1 / ••••1 I .4, 4.„44 : j .4,.".., l••....,. •... „.4_,...•° 4-,„. ......".:0,4 I 1•,,,,,•,,,c.T. ;••-•, •ii„.....„.:,...... t ft.'7. '.' -:.•''.1!.'. .! . „ . • ...,..* .4 • • 1 I „7, , :...`.. 44 4;44 , . „v. 4. 4,- r, ! . i• -..-„. . .. . . :11.1-5....: •.0.. •-•. •••'••••• •:-.....1•0' ,0,-,,,,.. •... • ..V. 1.• : AU"(4. ..". P i 1 .. ,•- ' ••P3 P: • •uPO: 4 i.; a'°A • .*.4.=, • • I • • / : 4.,„,4 ,4.4 , 4 . 4 V•••„ 4 .., 4 .• : •214,4 • .f4 i . ,,,W,•r.,44:14 44".3• ... • : , ... : 4 . . ' 4. ..A. r.,44,41` : •, .., • . 4.N.,• x .• .• . I ..' 'i•4' 4: ,, 4 1,,4,444,•••4 4 . .• .• 444: 1 • I • • , ,I.:11.,...,,,.......,-, A - ...1# ,',....._..... .• .• , .,_ -,,, .. - ,i. •-• .' .. . .• .• , . .• .• I - 0 <, •• .• • .,1 A . 1 .• .• • • .....0 i 'e 44 ) ' PP •••' 1 • • „• . i• 3"*A • • • ,3 • • • , PA. ,)+ ..,•• 4.., r' • • • •• .o• : •kt • • • • ,• ••••,•44- 1 • '•'•••!.11P1 • • , •:• .r•••••• A . 3 • A.,• • .• . . :. • : )0+ •4 ...,A.4 ! 1 4.z.• • . ... • • A •:i,c,'. •' .• r , 4.4. '' • I. i f' • l'' '. • .• • .'.I..4 '. --.0.i- - .%,....°... , .• .••••• . . .. . .1 4 , r z •- •. • , • ,•-'0. •Zit, . . .r:4" • .• .. .• ..• .• .. ..4*. . .• .• .• . .• .. . :I .• i .. ... • • „ .. • • •• : . • ...• ,. •••... h : ,,".''. •. - . 1. ..;A.A. .43+i+•' • • . , 43 . 4::••.).i *4 4 ' ' '1 .•••• i . 1..a. • , „ 4„„,„ ..„ •,• , :: : .. : . • • 3 4 ...- .. ' .-:... • ... • • .... : • .,t , a / (' : • • ... • • /.....r .• : . ., ' 1.+4. 4,04• • .• . .....A0.4;..0. Okl..-; . :.• •r. - „. •• .. ;.• W.' ,,, i. r.- • ',°.4.,. :: : 44tt• • . . . 4 t+0 • (.4' • , .. - ..• • : • • • . : .i... 0 • : •• . . .A : . „A. 4) pu • .:. . •• •• ....•; :: 4 +')4":AAP ••• •• . • 431....• 4) A 4 w• r 0 4474' 42•• 744 4 ..4••••4' •-•,:t•trriet ••.: • •••• - -• • : i „:•._ , • A,- •44,444,. • . , .••••••• 4 , . ..... ' i • ... ::: .:„.., ••:„.•;t4. •••444.4t - ...ri - •,,....". '44, • • 4444 •4 .... . . , 0, - . . .. • . . .... .. . , • . 4 . 4 ,„ „ 4. .3, 4 4.-5)- •: Ap:40 „. .„++• „ •• . ••• i PO • + P41-04.1 :PPP!, .PP; . • -, „•••• -44 f ft i . tiff - . •31 ..i..if . fifff•- to '.,4 0 „ : . . . . . . I II : . : .• : I : • . : : • • • . • • , ). .. .. 4 POT' . 3,+4 A's • ••• • • .. .. • • .. . . . . • < .. .. . ,A • • • , ,."..,„,,,- . . , • •. . < A • . , • • • • .,',4' . 'k , „... ... :...: ......- ., . . ... „ .. . . '4,;... ., • ....,k, . :J . . : . . .•, . 0;4, • .., .. ,.....: : • , k k....): , J• II ' ' ,. I I I I ■ k . ■ 714. 441441,4, +4 : . • : : 4.• •.. l'. .• .• . •• ..... .•* ' 4* • 4," 4• I 1 1 ' ' .• .•. • • . .• • ■ 1 I 11 4 1 i .• I:: : iiV441 • •• 44444/44.'44,44. ''...41:4;e1..4.°T.F.444.44'i:' * .1 P' .-f.t:+));t+°,14°41...,ry tit:- r , , I ...„••,,., ,:••14,:kto, +to• : ,f , . . . . ..' .. . 4.0k.i:r°444.41::. ' .:,.; ......,!6. .,,,,,,, i.....1'...4••..‘ 1.44 414"•/: i 41 4 ,, 1 . I . : ,;4,4. • • •.4••,,,' 4.4 2/444, ' • • 44 1 . I ' , 4.4 ,4" .+.4 .44.•; • ' - 4:44, - ..,•4,40 444/44e. •• 1 • i 'I . 444. ' .444444/4 t • •'.4.4:•••••...,' .. , . .• • 1 . 4 4• , , . . .• 74•44i .:...:46' . 1 1 i I i .. . .1 „.......-....., . •• • • • • .• .• 474 744' i i ' I • • 4. • ' •44X4 "ler •' ,...4 '.N74 4 • / W. • ..;' .4 ..3 • , • .• . • 14 4 4 . 2 . -4. • • - 7 , 44. . . . . . .• .• .• • 444 4 • 4 1 1 i 1 . • 44,/!4.440:1 • • I"4 i,'1.4./41 • .4,444- . ' ... •'AA I I. • •• A,..".• - •-•• -- .• •• . , 4 A • „...,,, +0 1 ) : 1 • . .. •• • _ .tr .. ,.. . . . .a . ,... „ : . . .. 1 a a : a .., i' •Of IP • • '.I4 I I i i ,. I .44 i . '_00 ! : „e ,....•! ,, ...„ . . :!•,„„! 0::'......0,*. !':"'"i'• 11 .• .! .: I .. . • 44 ei• .4 7 ./ , .••. . 4 .0 -,11/4.44.. .4„ 1444 r.44, • 44 i ' ' 1 -'4'.' . r'4 I I : . '•• • •, . i• ' 4.4)A . . : ,..: ,...- 0 :. t..?...",t;44.1::"/A. • „ . .. . . . • : . • . . ., . .• • • < . . • „ • . /•.ft At ,,, „. . , •• • A ...,,, Ai.i. I . , A , . . . .A 3 .4.41 I I II '••' '' , . 4'* . ..„.. • .4 .. • • 44314‘' 1 i\''',44,........444 ' ..,' . A A 3*''''''''.°‘ 3 I 4 ."5.. 44 / .44 '' •'444, - . / . . i .... :. .... , ' .14 A' ....:I.,i At . • • <, , •- 4 I .----- • .- - .. • :F4-. tr t•• . : : • : I 4 , • . , .: ,.... • • • ti• t • • ,4 • . : • .. „, • 2„, / A .. . 4 . „•••••• 1 i I f.,'J. • .... • : ., t-••••„. : .: .1 ; 4'.4,1. ' .ir•• 0 ,1.4:4 '4' . P. I i 0 .. 0 : / ' :. "P+.+ • i I I I 1 .. . ,;$. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... .4 . . . n.,. .. . • . . i ° ..... .. .. . .., .. .. . . ".1.'■ . 4:/.... .....' , •) 1 i 1 . I ‹..... ... .41 .... ) . . . . . . i ............ ))) I ... , 'Si it), . • *... 1 I )t.'.4.t. ..tt ' ICi)t...):'. i '..4' ' . ' .'.. ..'.. > .1 ..., ....• I I 1 .•.''' . . . -. ' . 4...' . 14Z 1 :e . , • e I. m - • ...A.At-A-t..0'.0-... .C A'' t 4, ,,} ' ' ' ' .44 A ' ' 1 ,: • •I• • •••-• I I . -.' •*„ i i i •, +.0 , ,A ii. " < : A - A A,,,, - I I >. • ,,-.• . i'ffitieff .+it f. . , k• ./ :•••• :••„:4„.„ • •••••,„ I I ,• " . • t „x z:.• , : 4444 .e. .' ''3.. ' .I. .'(....- I I,! 4...4' ' . '* . . I, '' .1) . ":',. ...'..:'. , ..,.... . Z . . . .. : , .•4.1" '' ' • '.. .' It.h•I"..*!ljlet ... `.4,5,4,..„, .:1,1.4'.1 ,, 4'..4,.;•'•- '....77'i,-.A ' . .I .4/ . . 'i . .. . .. - ..... , ,. /....Ptit,„4. 44,„„ • ••• /4:::::# T . ....,,i . - ...- .,i,.....1.,. .. „, ... .., . . . ... . . .............................................................................___.............___ . 12 " >, ai '0 w a QY a Q r � a) C� • • • . . . . • . • . • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS • Project Name: St,pRer es 's �rar �„ '( / KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. • Project Number: r ,, , 5 r '�,' - I� 610 SW Alder,Suite 700 Analyst: v Portland,Oregon 97205 • Date: 9/7/2005 (503)228-5230 • Filename: H:\projfileVS33-Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone(excenl7533_Sig Ou a=' ... .3,Fax: (503)273-8169 • Intersection: , ' 3Y :ae ::::,74..,—:mi s`. a .,:`ti, tlz Conditions(yr,alt.,etc.): 209'30 i''Eff A8-°§ 4,' f)''-eaaltti ciu61 ' " w.', ( • GENERAL INPUT PARAMETERS: Cycle Length: . s 41§e' sec • Confidence Level(C.L.): e.e. 5 ,' Storage length/vehicle: ' 1u�'; • "� .a�°25.feet • APPROACH/MOVEMENT i #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 • r( EL�n thing iTz ttsulw KsiltF313Tt EVVB- JTA WBFTs r=; -. M_ .�1M7 . . I • INPUT PARAMETERS: Volume(pre-PHF)(vph): A, 1 A w 125 9 j : 't39 z,: ,t, 2 r.. ;,# i • G/C for movement: C 1 mow, :,&68, ••0 , O7% :1) o : 'I Ioh1 � -^.--:-.O a Number of lanes: fi i,fL,f ,t l; M#1a_9 �1: a �?.s t •• 'V, . :x1 s lit, • CALCULATIONS: • Length of red interval(sec): 99.0 32.0 90.0 23.0 90.0 90.0 90.0 Average total queue(veh): 0.3 7.6 3.0 4.0 1.0 2.3 0.2 • Maximum total queue(veh): 1 12 6 7 3 5 1 Total queue length(feet): 25 300 150 175 75 125 25 • Required storage/lane(feet): 25 300 150 175 75 125 25 • PERMITTED LEFT TURNS: • Opposing volume(pre-PHF): 7 (x''": j) K j ='a i'„ b. • Opposing sat.flow rate: ro 4. - „ x • CALCULATIONS: Opposing flow ratio(Yo): • Unblocked G/C: Effective red interval(sec): • Average total queue(veh): Maximum total queue(veh): • Total queue length(feet): Required storage/lane(feet): • —•- — — • METHODOLOGY AND FORMULAS USED: • Length of red interval=(I•G/C)'Cycle length Oueue length=Maximum queue•Storage length p rvj per vehicle • Average queue/lano.Volume'Red Internet/3600 Required storage per lane=Queue length/Number of lanes,rounded up to the next highest whole vehicle • Maximum queue Random arrival/Constant service Random arrive!,behave according to a Poisson distrrbdron Opposing flow ratio Yo=opposing volume vo/ opposing lbw rata sop • There is a probebilxy equal to the confidence level desired(o g 95%) Thal the queue formal during each red interval will be less than Unblocked G/C(gu/C)_(VC•Vo)/(1-Yo) • or equal to the maximum queue • (Proh of arrivals=N)_(Red Irxervalrar'exp(-N)/Nt (Ihe Porsson dastribulion) (Prob of arrivals>.N)e I-Sum of probehllilies for vehicles 0,I. .N-1 • Max N Highest N such that the sum of probabilities>(I-cordidence level) • • • • • • • . • 0 • • • SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS • Project Name: "ippet•=o ,v 8 eztan ' >!<.. ,� KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. II Project Number: �a53, , F) y r 610 SW Alder,Suite 700 Analyst: ,, -� _ Portland,Oregon 97205 • Date: 9/7/2005 „. (503)228-5230 Ili\ • Filename: HApropile\7533.Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\excenl7533_Si0 Ou •-Son- ....-p Fax: (503)273-8169 Intersection: »:sTl7 , :_ u ` Val{ •� E ,,...„s • Conditions(yr,alt.,etc.): ',we T uIr$�1W eeE-':',: e 18t • GENERAL INPUT PARAMETERS: • Cycle Length: °t” x' sec Confidence Level(C.L.):■ Storage length/vehicle: �-P 1 4aS feet • APPROACH/MOVEMENT 1 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 ' • ,-SB rf Bfi FA1'vr° i;S13'0L� SBWRAW F ' iiIIRT 'MB- --" e '^ s tar'r I • INPUT PARAMETERS: ' Volume(pre-PHF)(vph): a*; :?:*-1'..x,696 1:,',,,,,p-,..0,6.. i r , �, 25 } 1 ' -�• • G/C for movement: i..,,,,,440,1,- 4-0.5.,, , ,0'B,,T,--* ‘::, ...t.,a f n 623 i4:4,,,,11 ". l 0,411-,' Number of lanes: l �s,' . .454401 ,.4....:. .sd' fig?_ • v0.4., E fmti„'IP,' ft • CALCULATIONS: • Length of red interval(sec): 100.0 48.0 87.0 35.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 Average total queue(veh): 0.0 9.3 4.0 8.6 0.8 5.5 3.0 i • Maximum total queue(veh): 0 15 8 14 2 10 6 Total queue length(feet): 0 375 • 200 350 50 250 150 • Required storage/lane(feet): 0 375 200 350 50 250 150 I • PERMITTED LEFT TURNS: Opposing volume(pre-PHF): y T :_°` +z� • Opposing sat.flow rate: I ,Tk q- . �" I • CALCULATIONS: Opposing 11ow ratio(Yo): . Unblocked G/C: Effective red interval(sec): ■ . Average total queue(veh): I Maximum total queue(veh): . Total queue length(feet): i Required storage/lane(feet): 1 • • METHODOLOGY AND FORMULAS USED: • • 'Length of red interval a(1•O/C)'Cycle length Queue length=Maximum queue'Storage length per vehicle • Average queue/lane e Votume'Red Interval/3600 Required storage per lane=Oueue length I Number of lanes,rounded up to the next highest whole vehicle • Maximum queue Random erriveVConslanl service Radom arrivals behave according to Poisson distribution Opposing flow ratio yo=opposing volome vo l opposing sat bow role sop • There is e probability equal to the confidence level desired(a g 95%) that the queue formed during each rad interval will be less Than Unblocked G/C(gu/C)_(VC-Voy11-Yo) • or equal to the maximum queue • IProb 01 arrivals=N)a(Red IntervallN'expl-N)/NI Ilhe Poisson distribution) (Prob of arrival,+=N)=I-Sun o1 probabilities for vehicles 0,1, ,N-1 • Max N Highest N such that the sum of probabilities>(I-conlzlence level) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Project Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone • Project #: 7533 • Analysis Scenario: expm V = flow rate for movement Analysis Period: 0.25 (peak 15 minute analysis) C = capacity of movement Analyst: CBT Q = 95th percentile queue (veh) Date: September 7,2005 S = storage need (ft) # of Int: ,w .,..71 Veh. Length (ft): . : ' 1 `Queue length calculated using Equation(17-37)presented in Highway Capacity Manual 2 . • ea Y•". . :?:%,-, oiy`•'rZ;,• U::s/_`^��,7,,����iY:ifU Ni4"a i�"F. l++ rJ�1 �'iEaa 04,9411% j fy' - ...1. n .'y '�. r i =7'^ �n S. 3 w" — .,r.•.r`M.• .3. ..�' ��7 .''{'�::.:: ��5sV°. ...f� wt' ' .rY —' .4: „i;r-: '^""�'f4;G;: .SAFti '�.. r�-'r }•�.; �4 it B� .,T_ =N6�>T11:�">' �r:�:�NBx�TW 5�'°•L1°-?, ,SB7:a-'�; ;�. . .:; ,.- ..�.%,,. ::'�,...,.,,.,3 : �r, � .._a'ks�, r:a�.�., � .. v V 70 6 5W Upper Boones Ferry Rd/ C 1017 339 • 5W Fanno Creek Place Q 0.2 0.1 • 5 25. 25 • • • • 7533 Unsig Queue-Fanno Ck.xls WSAM Project Name:'SW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone Project #: 7533 • Analysis Scenario: WSPM V = flow rate for movement Analysis Period: 0.25 (peak 15 minute analysis) C = capacity of movement Analyst: CBT Q = 95th percentile queue (veh) Date: September 7,2005 5 = storage need (ft) # of ` Int: , _ .lz . Veh. Length (ft):; .," p. •Queue length calculated using Equation(17-37)presented in Highway Capacity Manual 2000. ..-.. . _,:J %• ii.•s:.j>., •-a;6 i, s-.::.N.:..•,„.. .. 1 � . , ,t70.'''' '''' � �`r,•m�'a �' : a ,a a��"�� :n"j ,°,:f ��,�:.,"d<� 1� � : _T u rrE6 '(' �"� fN ' u,MtA i :-t s � �t= � - f� � •.._. ....:.:... �:.'ary;" .� ..+�,.•,c�;cr, .. e.-.'r .t: % ^P .i"s: ? '. :` i�;»'-l'- = :'T ■.l yy,, i:� .. ,:.ta1i 4�;,+ ��' •` E�,..• i i vs:m t '- �'': , q ? . _II.,:- " l.;,?4.s. ' x' � ;^ n- �: Bir''-r";`y 4,,,S; S=� LL ' i ' 1 7 3; �t-'Sf r t �t. ;53; '. ' i» . i •_ ' :.NB°LT"j :;;,?.N.1.057.711 :� B T1,; ;:-*S :-:L <"::_.x S ,;:T�N,w:'.,..',V SQ . . .,.�.;..r!s�- .,;'r ., fi :r� .� `x" ,LR.oX r,r r .,4, a� . , ,d , _:�::� ,t . "_ s.Z V 10 68 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd/ C 680 264 SW Fanno Creek Place Q 0.0 1.0 5 25 - - - - 25 - 7533 Unsig Queue-Fanno Ck.xls WSPM • • • • • • SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS • Project Name: 3 rte rty eiD e4„..4 r KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. • Project Number: ` 3 �r 610 SW Alder,Suite 700 Analyst: 1tku,: - . M �, � Portland,Oregon 97205 • Date: 9/7/2005 ,ti (503)228-5230 Filename: H:\propde\7533.Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry RezonelexceN7533_Sig Ou . .,Fax: (503)273-8169 • Intersection: 0 }$�pQ� D r r • Conditions(yr,alt.,etc.): NI n=#. t cc .t ealEa; • GENERAL IN PUT PARAMETERS: Cycle Length: { : 1.20 sec • a- Confidence Level length/vehicle: “9 Storage Iength/vehicle: 4= 2 .feet • • APPROACH/MOVEMENT • #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 _1 ?.d 113bY I,'4a:NESTE/1 i x , -61Lf.81`'Via..:. n 'g '-:4: _ 04-1 8• 7;t$ INPUT PARAMETERS: • Volume(pre-PHF)(vph): 'A't• 339 ,ji /4 za 2 61f y"a'W.a. �`y :'t-2 'S k m ' G/C for movement: � ° 0!73 3 r 27 k 1 4 f,�,Witt 1 ,,, 6 21 ALA Cf�i i 01 , Number of lanes i .,' • �1.> � - .aunr �1, .L .',a, .?,-:. e. . v, CALCULATIONS: Length of red interval(sec): 108.0 87.6 115.2 94.8 94.8 118.8 99.6, • Average total queue(veh): 4.. 8.2 1.7 4.2 6.7 0.2 6.31 Maximum total queue(veh): • 13 4 8 11 1 11 • Total queue length(feet): 210 325 100 200 275 25 275 • • Required storage/lane(feet): 21 r 325 100 200 275 25 275. PERMITTED LEFT TURNS: • • Opposing volume(pre-PHF): rdiae M pi.,,,w, ; # "° Opposing sat.flow rate: - • L CALCULATIONS: i • Opposing flow ratio(Yo): Unblocked G/C: • Effective red interval(sec): Average total queue(veh): • Maximum total queue(veh): i Total queue length(feet): • • Required storage/lane(feet): • • • METHODOLOGY AND FORMULAS USED: • Length or red interval=(1-O/C)•Cycle length Oueue length=Maximum queue-Storage length per vehble • Average queue/lane=Volume•Rod Interval 1360D Required storage per lane=Oueue length I Number 01 lanes,rounded up to the next highest whole vehicle • Maximum queue Random arrival/Constant service Random err'veb behave according toe Poisson distribution Opposing now ratio To o opposing volume vo/opposing sat lbw role sop • There is a probability equal to the conl idenee level desired leg 95%) . that the queue lonnen during each red interval will be less Then Unblocked O/C(LWC)_VC•TON-To) • or equal to the maximum queue • (Fob of arrivals=N)_(Red IrterveirN-exp(-N)/NI (the Poisson distribution) (Prob of e,rn,als a=N)=1•Sum of probabilities for vehicles 0,I, N-1 • Max N Highest N such that the sum of probabilities u(1-conlirlence level) • • • • • • • • • • S . • • • SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS • Project Name: py 1,t■- +. „qtair KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. • Project Number: -534:4- .• 1, 4 tn.', ...f.,..0-,.,po.W.4'.t f.-. ., P4' 4....4 . 610 SW Alder,Suite 700 '.11,e04,44' ..47..» Analyst: ':t1_:. .ti.:t-LtAt.44-t&.S.:41.- --,'-,,„ -,„0.. .., -0 4t. Portland,Oregon 97205 • Date: 9/7/2005 WI If r'..X■ 7.71'Y N, (503)228-5230 • Filename: HApropile\7533-Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\exceN7533_SIg Ou V U z-,4 1. ,Fax: (503)273-8169 Intersection: V:$1.,,1?-filft_,., B...k71116X41YR....L)%6*_:•,..•',151r:WA-414 • Conditions(yr,alt.,etc.): 21600dtaclitAtit%),-ilt•friitif.. ,:' _ O GENERAL INPUT PARAMETERS: Cycle Length: ".4*-1-11 sec • Confidence Level(C.L.): Storage length/vehicle: -Ni01,251feet • . • 1 APPROACH/MOVEMENT #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 • 1 45: T87 'A...', 'Eia ii•.:,,!:t,04w-;,.:7'..E.f ti-...,.:',,-,;,4.1,-.4;.,;... -'1'7.4.9A 4i,...,..4::::`..r,'.-k.f...:.:t"`i.7.....=.;•111:,, • INPUT PARAMETERS: . • Volume(pre-PHF)(vph): G/C for movement: 1 -"0"9,!Pq 4,4, wki.554,6,.,i9'4.i.S.1§5.t;i4„...‘41," •,=-','*..:*4 itt.$14-,.fr 4..,',.,''''..,-,-- ,,, t ,. ,r);,,,,,,.,:-,.....,,.i•A'',2f.'-..•:•'''I Number of lanes: 1..-1,,.,,, ..„j-4..,,,-, ,,,,ii-,",..:,.-,v,-1:', i":%7-,,,;..,!,,,4,:„ 41-1.„,;:. ,1,.f:''Ts..,,, i,,,14,,-••Ir4, ;•.. •, •. ••• • CALCULATIONS: O Length of red interval(sec): 74.4 54.0 54.0 . Average total queue(veh): 10.8 7.2 3.6 • Maximum total queue(veh): 16 12 7 Total queue length(feet): 400 300 175 • Required storage/lane(feet): 400 300 175 • • PERMITTED LEFT TURNS: Opposing volume(pfe-PHF): *.4 wrm ..,,,,,,71§,7-I eir 1 iii • Opposing sat.flow rate: grf:Ai..X. ,.f,:: '-4?-941 • CALCULATIONS: Opposing flow ratio(Yo): S . Unblocked G/C: Effective red interval(sec): • Average total queue(veh): Maximum total queue(veh): 411 Total queue length(feet): Required storage/lane(feet): • O METHODOLOGY AND FORMULAS USED: O Length of red'Marvel•it-G/C)•Cycle length Queue length xi Maximum queue•Storage length per vehicle (I Average queue/lane=Volume'Red Interval/3600 Required storage per lane=Oueue length I Number ol lanes,rounded els e the next highest whole vehicle • Maximum queue'Random arrival/Constant service Rardorn arrivals behave according to a Poisson distribution Opposing How ratio Yo=opposing volume vo/opposing sal flow rale sop • There is a probatelity equal to the confidence level desired(a g 95%) Ihst the queue termed during each red'Marvel will be less then Unblocked G/C(gu/C)ii(grC•Yoy(1-Yo) • or eq.'to the maximum queue • (Nob of arrivals=Ni=(Red lmarvalyiN'exp)iN)/N' (the Poisson distribution) (Prob of arrivals kiii N)=I-hornet probabilthes lor vehicles 0,1, ..N-1 O Max N Highest N such that the eon of probabilities>(1•confidence level) • • • . • • 5 . 0 III • • • • • • • • • SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS ID Project Name: 4M'il,titii; ';‘..n.., --..Ve At -•"..— '..".",,.A ' ;'''. KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. O Project Number: TM so '1';.1A,gAW*4,40.1i '','''44'''''": 4 v p ,---_, 01,3., 610 SW Alder,Suite 700 oti P rtland,Oregon 97205 • Date: 9/7/2005 -Tii a, (503)228-5230 Filename: H:Nprojfile\7533•Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\exceN7533_Sig Ou •- '--:.'.,..)Fax: (503)273-8169 O Intersection: S.-,.0.-0'.Z.,;..r.:v.-.--,:.177.•;E. 'IR.6 In • • Conditions(yr,alt.,etc.): et I Ek-Toted,',faifte,'.c. -ekda'.`V'"Rba iMouto ' Ill GENERAL INPUT PARAMETERS: Cycle Length: .'.5v.--.17.•. c■ sec • • Confidence Level(CI.): Storage length/vehicle: ,:,.:,-,•.:,- feet ... • . • • #1 #2 #3 APPROACH/MOVEMENT #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 -I • -Zit.NIBP.3ra.:.. c.z..7 BMA .1 i.SE1 • . INPUT PARAMETERS: Volume(pre-PHF)(vph): • " r " ;.:'4'4Pgill 41.34,. 11,21409.ef!.7.7 ,,,-,a-m.. ..tv-- • G/C for movement: Number of lanes: iry, 4038 i-kl.'iM.,,I.n 14, 1%4...!itize,1:•' ,,,H:',A:%=,..,...4 tilip;:,.,,,,g ‘717{ 1.1.N, .1,. ,4Th^•,it- ',,y,' 4:ltf,,, 't,,s,.,V-•A'?,,,•„1,,t4ho.k,,,,,,,, ,,,mo . alts441, • CALCULATIONS: • • Length of red interval(sec): 99.6 74.4 114.0 88.8 88.8 117.6 88.8 Average total queue(veh): 8.3 6.9 1.2 12.0 7.9 0.4 12.2 • Maximum total queue(veh): 13 11 3 18 13 2 Total queue length(feet): 325 275 75 450 325 50 18 450 III Required storage/lane(feet): 325 275 75 450 325 50 450 PERMITTED LEFT TURNS: • • CALCULATIONS: • Opposing flow ratio(Yo): Unblocked G/C: • Effective red interval(sec): Average total queue(veh): • Maximum total queue(veh): Total queue length(feet): • Required storage/lane(feet): 0 O METHODOLOGY AND FORMULAS USED: • . Length of red interval v(I-0/C)•Cycle length Queue length=Maximum queue'Storage length per vehicle • Average queue/Lane v Volume•Red Interval/3600 Required storage per lane.Queue length/Number of lanes,rounded up to the next highest whole vehscle • Maximum queue Random arrival/Constant service Random arrivals behave according to e Poison distribution Opposing How ratio Vex opposing volume vo/opposing net How rate sop • There is a probability equal to the confidence level desired(a g 95%) thal the queue termed during each red interval vall be less then Unblocked G/C(gu/C)=(g/C•Vol/(1-Tot • or equal to the maximum queue • OTTO0 of arrivals=N)v(Red IntervalrN'a:131.N)/NI (the Poisson distribution) - (Prob of arrivals.=N)a 1-Sum of probabilities log vehicles 0,I, ,N.1 • .Max N Highest N such that the sum of probabilities>It•conbdence level) • 0 • • • • 0 • . • • • • • SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS • Project Name: ,� e 4 ' a ego "' *" I V KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. • Project Number: 's o a 610 SW Alder,Suite 700 Analyst: = f � f k • O. Portland,Ore g on 97205 • Date: 9/7/2005 n (503)228-5230 H:\ Filename: proltitet7533-Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\ezce1117533_Sig Ou 4 .,Fax: (503)273-8169 • Intersection: rt s d*/s a rK"" '�R • Conditions(yr,alt.,etc.): 'a+ 7Dai eek ,.me . i =.1 • GENERAL INPUT PARAMETERS: Cycle Length: ` ,;:20'sec • Confidence Level(C.L.): '= • Storage lene h/vehicle: .nv::, ..ev .feet • • - _ #1 #2 #3 3 APPROACH/MOVEMENT #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 --I,,. 1 ‘',,..: -;.,..r 0:...,..v.IN, A Rutzmr • INPUT PARAMETERS: j Volume(pre-PHt7(vph): II,,},r ,jai; .+338 i;= 12 i z ,� s ';1� ,,,. 4 IN' t S. ' S a'4A 4 f vj ,N$'it w C� q>t yty„ ' '. S 1. . • G/C for movement ) t) r` e •q l a 2 �� e•Number of lanes: c ,,« ;A . •'- -.. .,r ,. o VA.:'I • CALCULATIONS: • Length of red interval(sec): 99.6 69.6 69.6 Average total queue(veh): 8.6 6.5 6.0 • Maximum total queue(veh): 14 11 10 Total queue length(feet): 350 275 250 • Required storage/lane(feet): 350 275 250 • PERMITTED LEFT TURNS: Opposing volume(pre-PHF): 01-4 , k .,,,,,-,,x 4' a • Opposing sat.flow rate: fir t '-,:, CALCULATIONS: • Opposing flow ratio(Yo): Unblocked G/C: • Effective red interval(sec): Average total queue(veh): • Maximum total queue(veh): Total queue length(feet): • Required storage/lane(feet): • • METHODOLOGY AND FORMULAS USED: • Length of red interval=(1-O/C)•Cycle length Queue length a Maximum queue•Storage lersOh per vehicle • Average queue/lane=Volume•Red Interval/3600 Required storage per lane=Queue length I Number of lanes,rounded ' 14 to the nest highest whole vehicle • Maximum queue Random errivalConslem service Random errivela behave according to a Poisson distribution Opposing lbw ratio To=opposing volume vo/opposing eel lbw rate sop • There is a probability equal to the confidence level desired(e g 95%) that Ihe queue loaned during each red interval will be less than Unblocked 6/C(gu/C)=(SIC•Yoy(1•YO) • or equal to the maximum queue • )Prob of arrivals=N)=Wed lrsorvalrk'•expl-N)/NI (the Poisson distribution) (Prob of arrivals c=N)=1•Sum of probebilcies lot vehicles 0.1. .N-1 • Max N Highest N such that the sum of probabilities>f •confidence level) • • . • • • • • . • • • • • • • • SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS • Project Name: -r rslie ' KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. • Project Number: ,- !'tg sv `/ - l!r 610 SW Alder,Suite 700 •Analyst: r ,8' `; • • • • • • SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS • Project Name: r ,,,S..:, -,`''''I''.,, ;-,' 1 �if KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. . Project Number: 7534-44'.;:', , , r' ,� ';,',: k V "� 610 SW Alder,Suite 700 Analyst: ,t4 —4-, , ,1,111,t...° Pr' �, Portland,Oregon 97205 • Date: 9/7/2005 `;,^ (503)228-5230 Filename: H:proiriie\7533-Opus NW Upper Boons Ferry Rezone Ou - `- Fax: (503)273-8169 • Intersection: ." dv. ._. • Conditions(yr,alt.,etc.): 23 , a as MITIGATED • .GENERAL INPUT PARAMETERS: Cycle Length: fk$, I sec • Confidence Level(C.L.): Storage length/vehicle: 4 feet • APPROACH/MOVEMENT i #1 #2 . , #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 • INIEBLf rr, :v:t m: '9' 1,° EBR .:. 4;.;;,fit's; " '2`-. .1 i a t°d,fa:"" " e%.t 1.' INPUT PARAMETERS: • Volume(pre-PHF)(Vph): rt ea , °;z r # � , i 47� 4,-7.4„.-.1,-,,,,, "F" ` t l, ` gg kIr' t 5 G/C for movement: 0f40 Pr n 0,67 10157 y ", 4 x , n r-. • Number of lanes .. , .i. -r , z� ,' •' " i,"3 • CALCULATIONS: • Length of red interval(sec): 72.0 51.6 51.6 Average total queue(veh): 10.5 6.9 3.4 Maximum total queue(veh): 16 11 7 • Total queue length(feet): 400 275 175 Required storage/lane(feet): 400 275 175 • PERMITTED LEFT TURNS: j • Opposing volume(pre-PHF): I k,.o Vt l rn • Opposing sat.flow rate: - , ri.ta CALCULATIONS: • Opposing flow ratio(Yo): Unblocked G/C: • Effective red interval(sec): Average total queue(veh): • Maximum total queue(veh): Total queue length(feet): • Required storage/lane(feet): • • METHODOLOGY AND FORMULAS USED: • Length of red interval=(1-0/C)'Cycle length Queue length=Maximum queue'Storage length per vehicle • Averege queue/lane=Volume'Red Interval/3600 Required storage per lane=Queue length/Number of Nnea.rounded up to the Ilex)highest whole vehicle • Maximum queue Random aniva•Conslanl service Random arrivals behave according toe Poisson distribution Opposing lbw ratio Yo=opposing volume no/opposing eel)bw.1..00 • There is a probability equal to the confidence level desired(a g 95%) that the queue formed during each red interval will be less than Unblocked 0/C(gu/C)_(VIC-'Yo)/(1-Vat • or equal to the maximum queue • .(Prob of arrivals=N)_lAud IntervalrN'asp(-N)/NI (Ihe Poisson disln'bulion) (Prob of arrivals x=N)=1•Sum of probabilities for vehicles 0.1. .N-1 • Max N Highest N such the)the sum of probabilities v(1-condence level) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS • Project Name: ,... ;„.. 4,',..." tWirg---:14/04‘554 I /47 KITTELSON&.■%SSOCIATES,INC. • Project Number: Analyst: .4,2;''''':;.3141$4i,..t*ki,,'.:It".;..g M3 A ,, -, •,•'.X..:.:::‘ q• .. vo•t, ,10„ „_-, „„,„ ,g $• .ttw,..- 7.,-,•-_,..i40.1.g, 4•;trivo•mf..,:Tr'„:,-..•'4,44*:47.11V ,.. KO' 610 SW Alder,Suite 700 '..,,,A. Portland,Oregon 97205 • Date: Filename: 9/7/2005 ..k,„. ,_,, \-et, (503)228-5230 HApropile\7533-Opus NW Upper Booms Ferry Rezone\exceN7533_Stg Ou 4413 'MM.•. ''-'- Fax: (503)273-8169 • Intersection: qn-Ll'''''' 3-;4'11e8"Te-; '`4 73 • ; "°lt,.\'‘•'` :1•,- 4,,z,:.•.-*T.r....*. • Conditions(yr,alt.,etc.): MITIGATED O GENERAL INPUT PARAMETERS: Cycle Length: ::''''''''"1201sec • Confidence Level(C.L.): Storage length/vehicle: z . • •-•:a 025 feet • APPROACH/MOVEMENT - - i 41/ #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 'N.t04 iggi74 rtsiErratErg tiltsign. "..77-1--izt t*M—Bra-M,7, .-4iTar;,- :11;64i011XWBT '-7)1 • INPUT PARAMETERS: III Volume(pre-PHF)(vph): ,- -.4:•-• ',Ter'n,.. M.4,-1-W,.''',,Atas..4- •-.1..f.,,,_.tasavr . , 4,-...,'AfEt-'1-*/*Wa30, 2''.:::'.."7:416 G/C for movement: ,c".•-tay,-,..„a,„,,,iliol.20 'L.%'00,'32.2 1-•-•,.;_tedit x•it'' "s' "Pg W ,::,?,=',- L., ,i,00.-4,„Iti 20704;• ."."0.4 s'...&21 • Number of lanes: -7r."-•i„."t1,-it'w ia-i..6:A,,,..,,--14.191m.,iti.. . ... :,74-,.1 .-W 4-Ig.t lair..i "lirigziwa,...,..z....,'7'.i ifl,-, ,,,s'-•.4"'.'ker..kakiikrot,:,.,-' 4...VOthl. • CALCULATIONS: Length of red interval(sec): 96.0 81.6 115.2 92.4 56.4 117.6 91.2 • Average total queue(veh): 8.0 7.6 1.2 12.4 7.6 0.4 12.6 Maximum total queue(veh): 13 12 3 19 12 2 19 • Total queue length(feet): 325 300 75 475 300 50 475 Required storage/lane(feet): 1 325 300 75 250 300 50 475 0 PERMITTED LEFT TURNS: • • Opgbsing volume(pre- S PHF): ,'',::4.,'-:..4,... 0 CALCULATIONS: • Opposing flow ratio(Yo): Unblocked G/C: O Effective red interval(sec): Average total queue(veh): 5 Maximum total queue(veh): Total queue length(feet): 5 Required storage/lane(feet): 111 5 METHODOLOGY AND FORMULAS USED: • Length of red intermit=(I•G/C)•Cycle length Queue length=Maximum queue'Storage length par vehicle • Average queue/lane=Volume Red Interval/360D Required storage per lane it Queue length/Number or lane.,rounded up to the next highest whole vehicle • Maximum queue Random arrive VConstaN stave. Random arrivals behave according to e Poisson distribution Opposing flow ratio Yo=opposing volume vo 1 opposing sal!low role sop • There is a probability equal 10 1110 confidence Will desired le g 95%) that the queue loaned during each red interval will be less than Unblocked CUC)W/C) g/C.YoYil-To) • or equal to the maximum queue • (Prob of arrivals ti N).(Red IntervalrN-exp(-N)/Nt (the Poisson distribution) (Prob of arrival...N)i.I•Sum of probabilities for vehicles 0,I. .N-I • Max N Highest N such that the sum of probabilities•ii-conlidence level) III III • • 110 S • • • • • • SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS • Project Name: k per blitaese a' ezon y KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. • Project Number: 1 <:,.., � 610 SW Alder,Suite 700 Analyst: ;cZ.4SE + WA, t' ,-_. �-,w, Portland,Oregon 97205 • Date: 9/7/2005 (503)228-5230 Filename: H.\propue\7533-Opus NW Upper Boons Ferry Rezone\excei\(7533_S(g Ou Fax: (503)273-8169 • Intersection: -'''8i '3e ia di a i"�d ' • Conditions(yr,alt.,etc.): 016go al afn , •Pe r MITIGATED • GENERAL INPUT PARAMETER S: n.e. Cycle Length: a- sec • Confidence Level(C.L.): 5° Storage length/vehicle: '=" feet • • APPROACH/MOVEMENT #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #B • ;?;'--B . ;- Tom= «. x geaos.i , ' :` -4 .,, x x l EBIiT , r z 1 ;:(, t INPUT PARAMETERS: Volume re-PHF (v ph): . 'a km ~k, { (P )( P ): 3 j 1j ° " 338 tgrias , , «,^ --6 t G/C for movement: O Q 0 9 g ,�, ,,,r ' �� �� ,` r • I Number of lanes: 'x° ci s"=s _� w a 1 : 6 : g ! 1 ,, '.,a�1 1a 'r i•M.4a N 413 .: k i7 j (24 !;. =* ..,C • CALCULATIONS: • Length of red interval(sec): 84.0 73.2 73.2 Average total queue(veh): 7.3 6.9 6.3 1 Maximum total queue(veh): 12 11 11 • Total queue length(feet): 300 275 275 • Required storage/lane(feet): 300 275 275 PERMITTED LEFT TURNS: • Opposing volume(pre-PHF): �' ' 9'-`7 ,"Y^�; t r`ty 44*• Opposing sat.flow rate: ��g CALCULATIONS: • Opposing flow ratio(Yo): Unblocked G/C: • Effective red interval(sec): Average total queue(veh): • Maximum total queue(veh): Total queue length(feet): • Required storage/lane(feet): I • METHODOLOGY AND FORMULAS USED: • Length of red interval a(1-GIG)'Cycle length Queue length=Maximum queue'Storage length per vehicle • Average queue/lane•Volume'Red Interval/3600 Required storage per lane•Queue length/Number of lanes.rounded up to the next highest whole vehicle • Maximum queue Random arrival/Constant service Random arrivals behave according to a Poisson dutnlution Opposing lbw ratio To=opposing volume vo/opposing sat flow rate sop • There is a probability equal to the confidence level desired(e g 95%) eat the queue lormed during each red usenet will be less than Unblocked GIG(gu/C)_(g1G-row 1-Yo) • or equal to the maximum queue • (Prob of arrivals a Ni•(Red 1nlerveryW•°sof-Ni/N! (the Poisson distribution) (Prob of arrivals se N)e 1•Sum of pmbahilsies for vehicles 0.I, .N-1 • Max N Highest N such That the sum of probabilities+(1•confidence level) • • • • • • • • transportation impact analysis - s ,emental Exhibit K1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 610 SW ALDER,SUITE 700 • PORTLAND,OR 97205 • (503)228-5230 • FAX(503)273-8169 January 18, 2006 Project#: 7533.0 Kim McMillan Development Review Engineer 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 RE: TPR Compliance and Queuing Analysis for Proposed Rezone of 6.16 Acres of Land Located on the Northwest Side of SW Upper Boones Ferry Road- Tigard, Oregon Dear Ms. McMillan: • This report provides an assessment of the short- and long-range traffic impacts associated with the proposed zone change for 6.16.acres of property located on the northwest side of SW Upper Boones Ferry Road in Tigard, Oregon. This work has been conducted as a supplement to our September 2005 Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) for the site and was requested by ODOT to address the Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660-012-0060). As discussed in our TIA, the proposed zone change will involve the redesignation of the property from IL (Light Industrial)to IP (Industrial Park). The underlying Industrial comprehensive plan designation will remain unchanged. This report contains an assessment of future traffic conditions under the expected build-out year 2006 and the planning horizon year 2021 (15 years past the likely adoption of.the proposed zone change). Comparisons are made between traffic conditions under "reasonable worst-case" land uses with the current IL zoning designation and the proposed IP zoning designation. The study intersections for this analysis were identified in ODOT's letter to the City of Tigard dated November 29, 2005. These intersections include the following: • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Durham Road (long-term operations); • SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Sequoia Parkway (short-term and long-term operations); and, • 1-5 southbound (SB) Ramp/SW Carman Drive (long-term operations). The traffic conditions evaluated in this report are based on the weekday p.m. peak hour, when the combination of traffic demand on the adjacent street system and site-generated traffic from the proposed site achieve their highest levels, resulting in worst-case conditions. Additionally, the transportation system plan developed for the City of Tigard is based on weekday p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts. H:\projfile\7533 - Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\report\f inal\7533rep_TPR_letter_FINALcIoc • • • Upper Boones Ferry Rezone Project#: 7533.0 January 18, 2006 Page:2 YEAR 2006 BUILD-OUT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The September 2005 TIA addressed year 2006 operating conditions at several intersections in the vicinity of the site. ODOT requested that the I-5 southbound ramp/SW Carman Drive intersection also be analyzed under near-term conditions. This analysis was requested to determine if the proposal will have a near-term impact on potential queues between this intersection and the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Sequoia Parkway intersection. As documented in our TIA, year 2006 conditions were derived by factoring existing traffic volumes by an annual growth rate of two percent and adding traffic from in-process developments as well as the projected site volumes. Traffic volumes at all study area intersections, including I-5 southbound (SB) ramp/SW Carman Drive, were obtained in August 2005. For the purposes of the analysis, year 2006 conditions were analyzed under both the current IL and proposed IP zoning. The resultant traffic volumes are shown in Figures 1 and 2. As indicated in the figures, the intersections meet ODOT's mobility standard of a volume-to-capacity ratio of less than 0.99. For the purposes of comparison, Figures 1 and 2 also identify the projected level-of-service at the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Durham Road intersection. As documented in our September 2005 TIA, this intersection is expected to fail regardless of site development on the subject property. The level-of-service shown in the figures reflect improvement of the intersection to include a second southbound through lane and a southbound right-turn. This improvement is identified in the City's Transportation System Plan (TSP) as part of long-term mitigation measures at the intersection. The longer-term measures include widening of both SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and SW Durham Road to five-lane cross-sections. The needed southbound improvements identified to address near-term conditions are the first phase of the TSP improvements. Although funding for these improvements have not been specifically allocated yet, city staff has confirmed that these improvements are of a high priority and are reasonably likely to be funded through the TIF program, conditions of land use approvals, and other potential sources. We will be working with city staff to determine Opus' proportionate share costs of these improvements. Attachment "A" contains the 2006 total traffic level-of-service worksheets for both zoning scenarios. A queuing analysis was also performed at the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Sequoia Parkway intersection to identify whether queues may extend into the I-5 SB Ramp/SW Carman Drive intersection. The I-5 ramp intersection is approximately 580 feet north of the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Sequoia Parkway intersection. Per the 2006 total traffic conditions analysis, 95th percentile weekday p.m. peak hour queues are not anticipated to exceed 325 feet under either zoning scenario. Therefore, the proposed rezone will not create queuing issues at the ramp terminal. Attachment "B" contains the year 2006 queuing analysis worksheets. Kittelson&Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon • • Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone-TPR Analysis January 2006 I- c9 13 9 ss yes ss \ vaABy °�~ yh (NO SCALE)rP 1 � 1 'I LOS=C r LOS=C r Del=26.6 Del=29.3 1 V/C=0.63 V/C=0.90 • 0 h � /fai6 2hy°g • • - I \ • 4- ‘:c •. \ - 1--_r_ a It ' O • Z w co yPp P i 2 o � 'P m 19. 6o & -4 'r? 'C's Q ' NI- ZS cp _ _'. ,f' ., `SITE' Spy :t . o� t Ry � q,,/ c 9 � ' 90 f r6‘6‘ 11/ ? o . O \\. N z :.�vk ���QP m rn 0 m . Ct ¢' co w • o a . a N. CO 3 • D •m • S O • N Lt 0 �, ° E LOS=D ' 0 m Del=47.1 V/C=0.68 t LEGEND �p J� 1` i CM=CRITICAL MOVEMENT(UNSIGNALIZED) ,§131/ �ry�° 4,,N,fo c. LOS=INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE o (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL . OF SERVICE(UNSIGNALIZED) • Del=INTERSECTION AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY e- (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT CONTROL 2006 TOTAL TRAFFIC CONDITIONS - CURRENT ZONING FIGURE s DELAY(UNSIGNALIZED) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR \V/C=CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO TIGARD, OREGON 1 ■17/n • • Opus NW Upper Boones Feny Rezone-TPR Analysis January 2006 1 -- ,o s s 55 ,,,,,,11,,.., °` \~ ,1bcP � ..o (NO SCALE) i LOS=C r LOS=C r Del=27.2 Del=31.0 V/C=0.65 V/C=0.92 0 • Z -± Q • JO • O cn 4990 eqs D Z D `i� m o' m 00- -$. `No t m � 0 iT 7 - '1jSITE URyq Z s�' ''',;',"-.:;',1',;y,.: IF ry co o N ��,t\�', 499 • o m o m • ce cnI W o a . a h • _v .. m ' , N c • Lai )4 l o LOS=D m Del=48.1 V/C=0.90 4 n LEGEND o / \ z CM=CRITICAL MOVEMENT(UNSIGNALIZED) 'b."�ry�°� ~,sms a LOS=INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE O (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL m OF SERVICE(UNSIGNALIZED) Del=INTERSECTION AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY (SIGNALIZED/CRITICAL MOVEMENT CONTROL 2006 TOTAL TRAFFIC CONDITIONS- PROPOSED ZONING FIGURE 9 DELAY(UNSIGNALIZED) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR \/C=CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO TIGARD, OREGON 2 Nr2 I • Upper Boones Ferry Rezone Project#: 7533.0 January 18, 2006 Page:5 PLANNING HORIZON YEAR TRAFFIC CONDITIONS In land use cases involving an amendment to a local comprehensive plan, the Oregon Highway Plan Implementation Action 1F.2 requires an analysis of future year traffic conditions for either the planning horizon year as documented in the locally adopted Transportation System Plan (TSP), or a 15-year forecast, whichever is greater. While no amendment to the City of Tigard's comprehensive plan is required with the proposed zone change, this analysis was conducted to for the request for the zone change. Based on the long-range traffic forecasts contained in the City of Tigard's TSP (2020), a forecast year of 2021 was selected for the study intersections. Traffic Forecast Methodology Long-range traffic forecasts for the horizon year 2021 were prepared to provide a basis for comparison between traffic conditions under the current IL and proposed IP zoning scenarios. The year 2006 background traffic volumes were grown 30-percent to arrive at year 2021 traffic volumes (two percent annual growth rate over 15 years). In addition to the annual growth rate, projected site traffic from the proposed site under the existing and proposed zoning was also added to intersection volumes. Planned Transportation Improvements The TPR provides specific language and direction on how planned transportation improvements in adopted transportation system plans can be included in the long-range transportation impact analyses for proposed changes to comprehensive plans. Specifically, the TPR allows funded projects or projects designated as "reasonably likely to occur" within the planning horizon to be incorporated into the analysis of long-range traffic conditions. The City's TSP includes the widening of SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and SW Durham Road to five-lane cross-sections. City staff confirmed that these improvements can be considered reasonably funded in the vicinity of the site. As such, our year 2021 analyses reflect these improvements. Total Traffic Conditions • Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the forecast traffic volumes and level-of-service at the three subject intersections under the existing IL zoning and proposed IP zoning, respectively. As.shown in the figures, the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Durham Road and SW Sequoia Parkway/SW Upper Boones Ferry Road intersections are forecast to operate acceptably under year 2021 conditions for both the existing and proposed zoning. The I-5 SB ramp/Carmen Drive intersection is forecast to operate with a volume-to-capacity ratio of greater than 1.0 under both zoning scenarios. Table 1 summarizes the forecast volume- to-capacity ratios. As shown, the volume-to-capacity ratio is forecast to increase by 0.01 with the proposed zone change. Kittelson&Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon • • Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone-TPR Analysis January 2006 I \ \ x`'$605 ss �~ �� (NO SCALE) it•' LOS=C r, LOS=E r Del=29.5 Del=63.8 V/C=0.74 V /C=>1.0 0 i p// 93�iy l 4\ , g2 ..—y. CO 1s • • • .i- F- Q -t- Q • O O Z U • cn -- W • co ti v t N) CO• yC4) Q` _ � oz O tv • FOP rZ m it m 0OO g 71- m cn C �f i-;-..,,/:;,‘"--,-;1, -.0,")�.: . _ -' ITE _ ,' i-A o 0. y' \y N y�' N Q Z ce. >-k O :\ e,g m •rn o • • c 0 - cal W • CI a a U. 3 . -1 a m • o • N • . s m U, Alo Los=C ° m Del=31.0 V/C=0.71 Q- LEGEND 1 1i, Rt z CM=CRITICAL MOVEMENT(UNSIGNALIZED) ��6y6y ~s qs. a LOS=INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL n OF SERVICE(UNSIGNALIZED) m Del=INTERSECTION AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY : (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT CONTROL 2021 TOTAL TRAFFIC - CURRENT ZONING FIGURE n DELAY(UNSIGNALIZED) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR _ �V/C=CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO TIGARD, OREGON `; mr..: • • Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone-TPR Analysis January 2006 • 0 `r\`► �c,,b% s°0•0,�.. 3o (NO SCALE) \o �yoo LOS=C �r LOS=E �r Del=30.1 Del=66.3 • V/C=0.75 V/C=>1.0 5 s 3 • Z O ;67 yQO 'P 1. < T- o D .�y� P m $ ,, m ,00 T % JQ m `T4 11 yr` .,;:?....,;:i:4,.., . -, S;ITE hq'� • o96yygo X � - ; , �� �o v V % ��v>,. k�Pey < ••� ��5 m 3 0_ d I ..... ill - Er a ul 3 a Z c o • GI . CC m 1l6 o Los=C ° m Del=31.3 V/C=0.72 LEGEND \t z CM=CRITICAL MOVEMENT(UNSIGNALIZED) 1��'y� s`ass LOS=INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE o (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL N OF SERVICE(UNSIGNALIZED) Del=INTERSECTION AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY • • (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT CONTROL 2021 TOTAL TRAFFIC - PROPOSED ZONING FIGURE s DELAY(UNSIGNALIZED) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR 2 V/C=CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO TIGARD, OREGON 4 ■17/n • • Upper Boones Ferry Rezone Project#: 7533.0 January 18, 2006 Page:8 Table 1 Year 2021 Weekday PM Peak Hour Operations Analysis Comparison (Intersection of 1-5 SB Ramp/SW Carman Drive) Scenario Level-of- V/C Ratio Service Current IL zoning E 1.09 Proposed IP zoning E 1.10 In land use cases involving an amendment to a local comprehensive plan, the Oregon Highway Plan (OHP) Implementation Action 1F.6 states that in situations where the intersection volume- to-capacity ratio exceeds the ODOT mobility standard, the performance of the intersection shall not be degraded further. Additionally, the policy states that if an amendment to a comprehensive plan increases the volume-to-capacity ratio further, it will significantly affect the facility. The TPR also contains language similar to the OHP Implementation Action 1F.6. Specifically OAR 660-012-0060 section 1(c)(C) states that a plan or land use regulation amendment significantly affects a transportation facility if it would "worsen the performance of an existing intersection or planned transportation facility that is otherwise projected to perform below the minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan." Based on the interpretations of OHP Action 1F.6 and the TPR, the projected 0.01 increase in volume-to-capacity ratio must be mitigated. This mitigation can be accomplished through the optimization of signal timing at this intersection for year 2021 traffic conditions. Our analysis for year 2021 reflects existing signal timing (including splits and offsets) at the intersection. Because the traffic volumes and patterns are anticipated to change between today and year 2021, it is reasonable to believe that the signal timing will be optimized at this intersection by the year 2021. With optimized signal timing, the volume-to-capacity ratio can be reduced to 1.07, which meets the OHP requirements. Attachment "C" contains the year 2021 level-of-service worksheets. A Synchro/SimTraffic analysis was also performed under year 2021 traffic conditions. Under both zoning scenarios, southbound queues at the intersection in 2021 will not exceed 475 feet, and will not cause backups onto the southbound ramp at the 1-5 SB Ramp/SW Carman Drive intersection. Attachment "D" contains the year 2021 SimTrafc queuing analysis worksheets for both current and proposed zoning scenarios. A 2021 queuing analysis was also conducted at the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Durham Road intersection to satisfy ODOT requests regarding the eastbound queues. It should be noted that since the comprehensive plan is not changing, that planning and analysis related to the proposed commuter rail line east of the intersection will not be affected as a result of the zone change. Under both zoning scenarios, eastbound queue lengths are not expected to increase as a result of the zone change. Appendix "E" contains the year 2021 queuing analysis worksheets for both current and proposed zoning scenarios. Kittelson&Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon • • Upper Boones Ferry Rezone Project#: 7533.0 January 18, 2006 Page:9 CONCLUSIONS Based on the short- and long-term traffic impact analysis findings documented in this letter, it has been concluded that the proposed zoning amendment to modify the 6.16-acre parcel from its current IL (Light Industrial) zone designation to the proposed IP (Industrial Park) zone designation can comply with the Transportation Planning Rule and related policies of the Oregon Highway Plan. We recommend that ODOT monitor the intersection operations at the I-5 SB/Carman Drive intersection over the next fifteen years to determine when signal timing should be optimized at this location. Furthermore, queuing analyses of year 2006 build-out conditions as well as year 2021 traffic conditions for both zoning scenarios show that queues at the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Sequoia Parkway intersection will not impact queuing at the I-5 Southbound Ramp/SW Carman Drive intersection, and eastbound queues at the SW Upper Boones Ferry Road/SW Durham Road intersection are unaffected by the proposed zone change. Please let us know if you have any questions or need any additional information. Sincerely, KITTS SON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. j-j,./04■ ; Christopher Tiesler, E.I.T. u a Kuhn, P.E. Engineering Associate P .ncipal Engineer Enclosures: Attachment"A"-Year 2006 Total Traffic Level-Of-Service Worksheets Attachment`B"-Year 2006 Queuing Analysis Worksheets Attachment"C"-Planning Year 2021 Level-Of-Service Worksheets Attachment"D"-Year 2021 SimTraffic Queuing Analysis Worksheets -• Attachment"E"—Year 2021 Queuing Analysis Worksheets—Upper Boones/Durham cc: Brian Bennett—Opus NW Marah Danielson—ODOT Region 1 Jason Grassman—ODOT Region 1 Kim McMillan—City of Tigard Kittelson&Associates, Inc. Port/and, Oregon Nspc Wed Jan 11, 2006 09:51:22 Page 1-1 wspc Wed Jan 11, 2006 09:51:22 Page 2-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Existing Zoning Wkdy PM Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Existing Zoning Wkdy 'PM Scenario Report Scenario: wspc Impact Analysip Report Level Of Service Command: wspc Volume: wspc Intersection Base Future Change Geometry: with site pm - Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee LOS Veh C LOS Veh C Trip Generation: Existing Worst-Case # 2 SW Upper Boones/SW Durham Rd D 43.7 0.825 D 47.1 0.883 + 3.307 D/V Trip Distribution: with site Paths: Default Paths # 11 Sequoia Pkwy/SW Upper Boones C 26.4 0.628 C 26.6 0.633 + 0.213 D/V Routes: Default Routes Configuration: wspc # 28 I-5 SB Ramp/Carman Drive C 28.8 0.896 C 29.3 0.903 + 0.533 D/V Traffix 7.7.0515 Cc) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND H:\projfile\7533 - Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\traffix\wspc.doc Page 1 of 4 • Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND /spc Wed Jan 11, 2006 09:51:22 Page 3-1 wspc Wed Jan 11, 2006 09:51:22 Page 4-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Existing Zoning Wkdy PM 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Existing Zoning Wkdy PM Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report «."««""," 2000 «"«««««««"«"2000"HCM"Operations«Method"(Future"Volume"Alternative)««««««««««««««•■ Intersection #2 SW Upper Boones/SW Durham Rd «""«"+«.«". Intersection«#11«Sequoia«Pkwy/SW«Upper«Boones ««««"+««,.««.««««««««""«««««.«"«««" :ycle«(sec)«" "" «««120««".««".«"".«"««Critical«Vole/Cap. (X)e««.""«' 0.883 Cycle (sec) : «120 "" «« Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.633 .oss Time (sec) : 16 )Y+R = 4 sec) .Average Delay (sec/veh) : 47.1 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 26.6 )ptimal Cycle: 121 ««Level«Of"Sery"ice:"««".".«"«"«"«««««D"«««« Optimal Cycle: «««63"«"«««««««".""«"Level«Of"Service «.«"«««..««««««««.0««««« Street«Name««"•"SW«Upper«Boones«Ferry Road SW Durham Road Street Name:«««"«« SW Sequoia Parkway SW Upper Boones Ferry Road approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L -- T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II 1 1 II II II I _ontrol: Protected Protected Protected Protected Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected lights: Include Ovl Include Include Rights: Include Include include Include Alin. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 II II II I I II II II I Jolume Module: Volume Module: 3ase Vol: 280 307 10 33 437 438 300 299 298 13 413 11 Base Vol: 11 12 24 466 3 92 63 710 1 7 462 446 lrowth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 286 313 10 34 446 447 306 305 304 13 421 11 Initial Bse: 11 12 24 475 3 94 64 724 1 7 471 455 Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 8 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 14 0 0 3 0 In-Process: . 15 7 0 5 10 0 0 33 8 0 64 0 In-Process: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 10 0 Initial Fut: 301 322 10 39 464 458 308 338 312 13 485 11 Initial Fut: 11 12 24 475 3 95 70 745 1 7 484 455 Jser Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 311 333 11 40 480 473 319 350 323 14 502 12 PHF Volume: 12 14 27 529 3 106 78 829 1 8 539 506 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 311 333 11 40 480 293 319 350 323 14 502 12 Reduced Vol: 12 14 27 529 3 106 78 829 1 8 539 506 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 311 333 11 40 480 293 319 350 323 14 502 12 Final Vol.: 12 14 27 529 -3 106 78 829 1 8 539 506 I_.. it II II I I II II II 1 Saturation Flow Module: Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 • Adjustment: 0.93 0.98 0.98 0.93 0.93 0.83 0.93 0.98 0.83 0.94 0.99 0.99 Adjustment: 0.90 0.85 0.85 0.93 0.93 0.83 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.91 0.96 0.82 Lanes: 1.00 0.97 0.03 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.02 Lanes: 1.00 0.33 0.67 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1769 1796 57 1769 3538 1583 1769 1862 1583 1787 1833 42 Final Sat.: 1702 538 1075 3494 22 1568 1702 3400 5 1736 1828 1554 1 II II II II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.02 0.14 0.19 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.01 0.27 0.27 Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.15 0.15 0.07 0.05 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.29 0.33 Crit Moves: "" """« """" """" Crit Moves: **** """" ""«« Green/Cycle: 0.20 0.31 0.31 0.04 0.15 0.36 0.20 0.50 0.50 0.02 0.31 0.31 Green/Cycle: 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.07 0.58 0.58 0.01 0.51 0.51 Volume/Cap: 0.88 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.88 0.52 0.88 0.38 0.41 0.41 0.88 0.88 Volume/Cap: 0.18 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.28 0.63 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.57 0.63 Delay/Veh: 68.8 36.2 36.2 69.8 65.4 31.3 68.0 19.1 19.5 66.3 54.1 54.1 Delay/Veh: 57.0 75.4 75.4 42.5 42.5 37.6 64.3 14.4 14.4 73.6 20.9 22.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 68.8 36.2 36.2 69.8 65.4 31.3 68.0 19.1 19.5 66.3- 54.1 54.1 AdjDel/Veh: 57.0 75.4 75.4 42.5 42.5 37.6 64.3 14.4 14.4 73.6 20.9 22.6 HCM*}*A«g««««««15«««11««««11«««««2«««1««««««9««««15««««8«««««8«««««««««21««««2««« HCM2kAvg: 1 H:\projfile\7533 - Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\traffix\wspc.doc Page 2 of 4 Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND .✓spc Wed Jan 11, 2006 09:51:22 Page 5-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Existing Zoning Wkdy PM Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #28 I.5 SE Ramp/Carman Drive Cycle (sec) : 75 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.903 Loss Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 29.3 Optimal ..Y..e........9¢................Le`el Oft Service: C .................. ..... • Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II II II Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 I _II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 85 83 457 0 696 526 232 506 0 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 87 85 466 0 710 537 237 516 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 14 0 0 1 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 87 85 468 0 724 537 237 517 0 User Adj: .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0..90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 96 94 520 0 804 596 263 575 0 • Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 96 94 520 0 804 596 263 575 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 96 94 520 0 804 596 263 575 0 .. II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 0.83 0.73 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.93 0.98 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.49 2.00 0.00 1.15 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.00 Final Sat. : 0 0 0 801 782 2786 0 1902 1410 1769 1862 0 -I II ._- II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.19 0.00 0.42 0.42 0.15 0.31 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.47 0.47 0.16 0.63 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.90 0.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.49 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.5 29.5 46.5 0.0 26.1 26.1 59.8 7.6 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.5 29.5 46.5 0.0 26.1 26.1 59.8 7.6 0.0 HCM.kA.........0....0.....0.....6....6.....9.....0...19....19....10..........0.. H:\projfile\7533 - Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\traffix\wspc.doc Page 3 of 4 4spp Wed Jan 11, 2006 09:50:50 Page 1-1 wspp Wed Jan 11, 2006 09:50:50 Page 2-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Proposed Zoning Wkdy PM 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Proposed Zoning Wkdy PM Scenario Report Impact Analysis Report ;cenario: wspp Level Of Service :ommand: wspp Intersection Base Future Change Jolume: wspp Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in 3eometry: with site pm LOS Veh C LOS Veh C Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee # 2 SW Upper Boones/SW Durham Rd D 43.7 0.825 D 48.1 0.895 + 4.357 D/V ['rip Generation: Existing Worst-Case ['rip Distribution: with site # 11 Sequoia Pkwy/SW Upper Boones C 26.4 0.628 C 27.2 0.646 + 0.779 D/V Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes # 28 I-5 SB Ramp/Carman Drive C 28.8 0.896 C 31.0_0.922 + 2.198 D/V • :onfiguration: wspp • • Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND H:\projfile\7533 - Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\traffix\wspp.doc Page 1 of 4 • Traffic 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND ,spp Wed Jan 11, 2006 09:50:50 Page 3-1 wspp Wed Jan 11, 2006 09:50:50 Page 4-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Proposed Zoning Wkdy PM Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Proposed Zoning Wkdy PM Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Level Of Service Computation Report .***********«***«**«****«***************«*«**************************«******** *«..«*«*«*«,2000*HCM*Operations*Me`hod*(Future*Volume*Alternative)*«*...«...«««« [ntersection #2 SW Upper Boones/SW Durham Rd *.*«***.***«**«***«****.****«.*****««***.*****«*******«**«*«.«*********«*«***** Intersection #11 Sequoia Pkwy/SW Upper Boones *******.**************.**.*« :ycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.895 ********************************«******************« boss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay )sec/veh) : 48.1 Cycle (sec) : 120 Critical Vol./Cap. )X) : 0.646 optimal Cycle: 127 Level Of Service: D Loss Time (sec) : 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 27.2 .*****«************«*******«******«******************«************************** Optimal Cycle: 64 Level Of Service: C Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road SW Durham Road ***************************`***************************************************« Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Street Name: SW Sequoia Parkway SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound. _.--.-I - 11 11 11 I Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R :ontrol: Protected Protected Protected Protected I II II II I Rights: Include Ovl Include Include Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Kin. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 11 11 11 I Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Volume Module: I II II II I Base Vol: 280 307 10 33 437 438 300 299 298 13 413 11 Volume Module: growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Base Vol: 11 12 24 466 3 92 63 710 1 7 462 446 Initial Bse: 286 313 10 34 446 447 306 305 304 13 421 11 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Added Vol: 0 5 0 0 34 45 7 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 11 12 24 475 3 94 64 724 1 7 471 455 In-Process: 15 7 0 5 10 0 0 33 8 0 64 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 4 23 56 0 0 9 0 Initial Fut: 301 325 10 39 490 492 313 338 312 13 485 11 In-Process: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 10 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Fut: 11 12 24 475 3 98 87 787 1 7 490 455 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 311 336 11 40 506 509 324 350 323 14 502 12 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Volume: 12 14 27 529 3 109 97 876 1 8 545 506 Reduced Vol: 311 336 11 40 506 329 324 350 323 14 502 12 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Reduced Vol: 12 14 27 529 3 109 97 876 1 8 545 506 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 311 336 11 40 506 329 324 350 323 14 502 12 MLF Adj: 1.00 1 .000 1.00 15000 1.00 1.00 1 000 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 00 -I II II II I 1 II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 0.93 0.98 0.98 0.93 0.93 0.83 0.93 0.98 0.83 0.94 0.99 0.99 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lanes: 1.00 0.97 0.03 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.02 Adjustment: 0.90 0.85 0.85 0.93 0.93 0.83 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.91 0.96 0.82 Final Sat.: 1769 1798 56 1769 3538 1583 1769 1862 1583 1787 1833 42 Final Sat.: 1702 0.33 538 0.67 1075 3494 0.01 1.00 22 1568 1702 3400 0.01 4 17336 1828 1554 I--- II II II I I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.02 0.14 0.21 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.01 0.27 0.27 Capacity Analysis Module: Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.15 0.15 0.07 0.06 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.30 0.33 Green/Cycle: 0.20 0.32 0.32 0.04 0.16 0.36 0.20 0.49 0.49 0.02 0.31 0.31 Crit Moves: Volume/Cap: 0.89 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.89 0.57 0.89 0.38 0.41 0.41 0.89 0.89 Green/Cycle: 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.09 0.58 0.58 0.01 0.50 0.50 Delay/Veh: 71.3 35.9 35.9 69.5 66.1 31.9 70.0 19.3 19.8 66.5 56.3 56.3 Volume/Cap: 0.19 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.30 0.65 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.59 0.65 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 57.2 77.6 77.6 43.2 43.2 38.2 62.2 14.2 14.2 75.4 22.0 23.7 AdjDel/Veh: 71.3 35.9 35.9 69.5 66.1 31.9 70.0 19.3 19.8 66.5 56.3 56.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM2kAvg: 15 11 11 2 12 10 16 8 8 1 21 21 AdjDel/Veh: 57.2 77.6 77.6 43.2 43.2 38.2 62.2 14.2 14.2 75.4 22.0 23.7 *******«*«*****«**««*****«*****************«********************* HCM2kAvg: 1 3 3 10 10 3 5 9** 9 * 1 14*.* *14«* Page 2 of 4 H:\projfile\7533 - Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\traffix\wspp.doc Traffix 7.7.0515 (C) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Nspp Wed Jan 11, 2006 09:50:50 Page 5-1 • Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2006 Total Traffic Conditions -- Proposed Zoning Wkdy PM Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #28 I-5 SB Ramp/Carman Drive Cycle (sec): 75 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.922 Loss Time (sec) : 12 )Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 31.0 Optimal Cycle: • 101 Level Of Service: C • Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound • Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -I II- II II 1 Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 • I.. ..--II-. -II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 85 83 457 0 696 526 232 506 0 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 ' Initial Bse: 0 0 0 87 85 466 0 710 537 237 516 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 56 0 0 4 0 In-Process: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 10 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 87 85 471 0 773 537 237 530 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 96 94 523 0 859 596 263 589 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 96 94 523 0 859 596 263 589 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 96 94 523 0 859 596 263 589 0 -II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 0.83 0.73 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.93 0.98 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0149 2.00 0.00 1.18 0.82 1.00 1.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 801 782 2786 0 1961 1361 1769 1862 0 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.19 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.15 0.32 0.00 Crit Moves: "`i' #*** i**. Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.47 0.47 0.16 0.64 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.59 0.92 0.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.50 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.9 29.9 49.9 0.0 27.7 27.7 64.4 7.6 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.9 29.9 49.9 0.0 27.7 27.7 64.4 7.6 0.0 HCM2kAvg: 0 0 0 6 6 10 0 21 21 10 8 0 H:\projfile\7533 - Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\traffix\wspp.doc Page 3 of 4 • 0 • .co(o I* Fie_a_k HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis TI 4 6: SW Upper Boones Ferry .Rd & SW Sequoia Pkwy 1/13/2006 k---,CA.rkriOj.)ta;AF':,:-a',-.N:VZR:EfltM,;;ga,T,ai:.,T,03gfgAtF_t,tif,AqagikNfij;-hVCtAg.V-LZi\taTS:,A:;N,I5„Fti,A,$13L-tfi5VSBMSPtg Lane Configurations li +T. ' I, V ) .; vi 4' r 104P,,*(00 0)iAtZPriSli,9,991,71:9,001R1P00 IA1 00920 0,91.91.0:1 PPOP 99.04,70,94fili 9001 90.024:1:99911 9, 09 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Itke:10,WFOOtKirtii.%30.0.xp.o.,.. :,,7 ft7,4:ActEfkoovIObg,,t00011Z-tbOt.:411k9PT,':::;irc.iiMVqt:Zir40';O: T.11.49 rk 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1 Too 0.90 1.00 1.0u 0.85 . PrRt000.-04;V_,:*0:,:::?;,:g.t;-__A(1:9,.5,;e44,;P,,atrigi-AX441;-9§1099-zAPPNr.-rt9.,k:1,--4:Ack:4-4-§,:ggi-A9-§..,4,F=.9t..9,§.at49r44 Satd. Flow (prof) 1703 3405 _ 1736 1827 1553 1703 1 61 3 1665 1670 1568 F20 Pteii,.ftWDM-74t.'-;'V:2W-_1;1g-tggqiPg$K,P50,Z.tfgOb--ZT-V-g7:.TTA:R:',I'Zsfgf.2'05Z'if;4'.05'.A'Z:i?if09 atd. how (perm) 1703 3405 1736 1827 1553 1703 1613 1665 1670 1568 YO1.09014043-e01,g10:427,7004eti'Alfgt i;.4§7:-Agi-4§.§a0:MlffIR1..;?N5.2:.--gPili,:'..4:474i-V-i= g97; Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 401FlikNOW::;-';'.Va::32a:i70_.gM:170 ::4,:;,);144,3R:tW:7144t=.................................................................................................. Lane Group Flow(vph) 85 796 0 7 497 464 11 36 0 243 245 99 064,.■.49,,Oilcre$TYci.n-:1,k::F,Vi6:**,'',46*4'4:-;;':P?kttik.4%::-,:-',&:.-;--4 .4.1 .Wicil.P:46%iii .,-.(0/4;*69/e::'-::-:4:':',35)/6,-,.11 .:2%.2.r.4-.-',-3-3% Turn Type _ Prot ..._, Prot Over Split .. Split Perm Rf00160iRoa0a --:'_;::.',1'.,:,:: :1'..::::--:±1 1.,t..:':1A6;'.:,f.§:-,: k-1_1:'4..1.:5 i,.W.2 g,a.:,8 -.'.,;,‘.1]4;:1!:4; ',...;'g:'24 .--::.;;>:::Z , 8 ,:=;‘,:,:; ;:qi Permitted Phases . 8 p■.6t1;j00:5)70ipp:=( ) *51';')‘:.-',.29*,q,k,:::?...:4-pp55 ::::!"2 :i19: _.,-.10:Spy`;.0: ::.:-::- . . .:.:Ni:;.:.,:::;:ii 8.3-:-c:i::-.1 8:'3--:q:::.1 83 Effective Green, g (s) 4.5 29.9 0.5 25.9 18.3 3.2 3.2 18.3 18.3 18.3 49tOte4:d/C50atio.:,.:,..:;.:.-:-:. 0.1?7:i :',.0.#4-::,:i.:,:.::A......::'';- '1:1:01:',::: ::0. 8 0:'27,:,;',:::.,p,o5 '„,:;L',D:05':.:-..'::'::‘:-,:':.;:-_--;.:.;'0.p7'..,-'.;',...0.'27";::":::.S:1:27 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 VetiidleT)dehitori!O)ii:-;.-=.-.z.A',.37.0--4,/--:''s.:,:3:0:: :-:,;--'::.-w?-:i'?Ti..:41:w,:--;::',3i1)::!,0:-.4,:?.$0,',:,;;007.P',.;:7,0,:.(1:!:--:;::..f..:.,::.::"1::::-:.,'.!,; 3:13,T.::-;::;:-:10.: ..., 3fo Lane Grp Cap (vph) . 113 _ 1499 13 697 419 80 76 449 450 423 v/Ss.F10110:VOtii ::;:.. '':::,:":coli:05`,,_;10:kg . '0 00 :cti..47 ;c01,30 I.''-' 01.f.01::::::c0:0?,`,?:-,;;H: .:,.-::::i,.0.15;', ..011 6::::: .„.::;:i:-.,,,.;..= v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 v./4iR00.,,.:F4,),.4:_-::..0-..,: ::::-.;-.1j-il5,:;;.:,,,-.....,p-03.7'.:; :r:,;........'-.;;;.: ',,,QI$4'.'Z:.1. 0.7711:p',:i,;';141 :':;:°3:1(:0:;"1 441-1,::=ifp-i47 z..: ::.::;:::::-.-A...-::-_ 0-., 4,:t3!-,.10;'54.,,,',;:: 0:.4 • Uniform Delay, dl 31.2 13.9 33.6 17.8 24.8 31.0 31.5 21.2 21.2 19.3 Prd,g04004(FCtor ‘- :/,,...:,:_i-.:-.,1:-.0.1;.-:,,,.1:90 1::::10OV:',1',..Qc).". .::::=_.i:oo.,,j;,:,.1':::00..:.,:-.•:"Ii:-6-0- ',;.:k...;.,: ::::40.001::,, ,A-.00 ':....;-1'-:00 Incremental Delay, d2 24.2 0.4 36.8 3.5 76.4 0.8 4.6 1.3 1.3 0.3 DO4c6...fWit.: '_'-:;.'.: -::.= ::'-'±',:! 5 A: ::.:'-142;:::.V''=-:;..:A704::,,.521::,$.:-:1 fl101. ,%;::2::::,:3:;F:8X-e;":06:71,1, ":64'::' :f:225 ggp,. .,..:1 9.p Level of Service E b E C F C D. C C B Approach-;:pelyAs)::•.:::',:..,, '' :,.:.,,:', ...18.'2.:11.:•`i,.:rt.:::;,: :14,-.:•:f::'::59.91":::Y;s.:' :;::'::::1: 0,:;;;:i;:;;;',:.35.1....:',-;::'::::,,:;:,Y%,:;--::.-''.:--- ' !',22.1:,';'):.,:. Approach LOS B E D C IbteroqtrotaliMiliary,-&4:41 :: :kfia--;*-igVA:Ue.,-,itZti-Wii.' --ki$1.W.tir.fsiflti-;z:aakigill'AMMii.Matt'A HCM Average Control Delay 35.7 HCM Level of Service D HOMWOILim4'-:to_capaOity ratio :- s 2. ::!fii.r.:,..,:i3:89-:,;':.. .:1'.., :',.;:...'!"-.:-7:: ::.:';:„M,::?=:_.:'!;,N;-:.'f--_74:;::-,:;;,---:- Actuated Cycle Length (s) 67.9 _ Sum of lost time (s) 200 Intersection Capacity ' - -';'6 1;.0%-,.-': :.--:'1'-:ICU Level of Seriiite -43 ':-_--:• - ' - ..:.:•-.'-.•....- c Critical Lane Group Baseline Synchro 5 Report Page 1 KITTELPOR6-FF51 • • 2zy:),(,,, .‘>1.,ik ezi.:t•:._ --- HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis i lif-k 9: SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd & 1-5 SB Ramp 1/13/2006 '"4 - ..Nt ' c 41- 4.'.- 4\ t P \* 4' 4/ M.0,001.0013::illaBlat.WAT.i.ViVVOFT1g4tNfiCtl$1.1.5.7-origkilif3647$1.3.C4Zi.513:ViTi.S.1515. Lane Configurations, , +T.) ) 4 4 rri 0-60.,: .!-oil(vost.41) zo..0Q.:i.,000:cgts:rilpoo.i:41P99 :::11093:42Blippo'&4,900:LtN$909114!).900.VPoo9P,004A0p Total Lost time (s) . 4.0 4.0 4.0 . 4.0 4.0 Q'103-0)Ptt..57.40.'Org.iVnifiV.V.51:1.*0...S1-4,i364.PIP-Q,I,M).0ni5FFI,INSN'tgli:illitillIfiN:1,; 410:0A,0,10,01: Fri 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 A- .----I:,1--.i.i"--,. "Nt-:.:, '..:---" t'r,-1---::: ;- ' .e------v,,•- --- 4- 0§7.00c11::061.1;i;:pg;:2<`;''.. -jj;:17.;c:C121,1;;:chi!: 43:e jit,:tki:9@§,..0.1`,0;14:9,91-2. :4ZItilxt.;;,-,;.;.V.1-;,:.4:4',1;:±Zzy:::,:g6;5-i2,,,;;;.,;;f4,;ZApi9A,:-,-,-,17.19,p Said. Flow(prot) 3322 1770 1863 1817 2787 FittPeniiitted --7---ii,4:-;: :,,,,,v;,,--,2--'2.4-=:,,,..,:t otv-,:s.44:':,---, J.O.:95. 4.':t071'. m , ;:,'5:nw,,?i,-;.rii;,:•,F,,,-t::;.-.,.,_--..).., -::::''649 6,'''',....'ir-DO ..,,,..!.._ ', ,...0-., 31-=::N..',,,-1ti:::-.v.Tv.c.;,:s,..1 ).....;:_-,_.4, ,t.72--,:xx.g4.., =- a;.V.:4:2",',4-':-.2...:.v.v.,-;=-5.17,- :-.LrAttg.',-.z:r-31.. ij...-'- ,,,,:■'-;:,?';.---..: Satd. Flow(perm) 3322 1770 1863 1817 2787 Nt6P6"l:g6!,OP'_iff.'g2jf;...;1-'4Vr:r5;PV.igiT,alif-;t5P7fA-gg.q7* ',:-. .:P'P:ki.ftfl;P:i:I?,NM=R;i=Vg4''"A..TI9': ",3?-g;;§ -i5?.7.j'-P..,-,'.'"'-':--t'';''T01. Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ;Adj:5007W7,00:1,),Y>1,:7,.:IF.:1a-;:.::".;'PM43:g;;22)-SgU",g.P%ik'.1.§ 0,,:W2iSZ,9.1 ";-::34,:!gilf:',V,:i.:V=:::,:g:;,:.:Y.94V'-.1477,`=":. ...:5:9.4,..;I=,;..?:::',.$.?3 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1456 0 263 589 0 0 0 o 0 191 523 1414aWyAfifoo$:10/01k,-zi.,4,..V.;p*i.:,!.',..]::::RN--..:,-;.?..,r,;,.2946:-. 0)//903'ii.:2P/4:-Aq...417DP4:4 ,'. .:0%:tii::,4':::0P4:;";',5.'',::f;:-09A;_:;:'.K.;`,2*,:'6.....2%':;:'=44f:f2N . Turn Type Prot Split Perm 0(610460,haSik.'72.f ',;‘li:;:?..-.'.';,4f.'.i'.-1",'..:-,N, r57:Y-;:;,ti.:-;!;: ::::-::7-41f:-.7-,:ilii,r;'::.1.=?,.=.,:. ,1,-;;-7.9;i"n:if;,.-.'i,i7iF 8:. .:37?'"?-::' Permitted Phases 8 iNdtdafedigoetbic::g.,:(4) ,,-1::::.:::,...'-,7):... .,c1-';:;...•3.7.'4. ::::,':,,-;-,..,:'•j,,:.;4'::::::1 2..;:8.. :.,‘,.-:;..54,--2 1:V . ..,. : :.:..:-..f. . Y1:2..,...,:::.,:,1 2'i 8 Effective Green, g (s) 37.4 12.8 54.2 12.8 12.8 Adtuatedi`g/q-jiotip,::,:,...:,:, ::.,... .-:,......,,,,,..0,Agf::,,,,,,,i.:::-;;:z:..=,..::.' 0:17ii,..„=.:,,x1:72-j5sii;:.::,;„::::ji,F:? i: , ..;.::::ii-.:::::.:.-.;:::::_-_-:: o 17,:.. :0.1 7 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 VeliiCleciEkteiiiidh g) S:5 `;:F-.,;:*::-.:',%i5.:'; ',A0 5:75...ii:t;::.Y;',.:-. ,',4:,i,,l':,-3: ;;"1,-;;,,',;-,-To-!;;;:',-_,::,';:,:.,',''.::,,,..::.=!-::''.1-,--;,:;:;,,:g.',:t:-:',25p:',,--:'-:',2:5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1657 302 1346 310 476 11Si17i..,41i0?-r01;.;:*;: -0:r.r.'3=Sk'.:-:;:-::-:':; 04.4 :.•:::',',i,;.1,..:::.'"?.:.;,pol-- '...'o ?...1,:,',::,7:e::;,.- ,,,..,z:;:.:',.:.,,;...::-:',:..i.:,,4,,..J.Qi-,,--o,:;;,-.:;:.. .' ::.,3!:,.,,......:-.;:,::'--.. ,,,,..00t....,:.:::,:,,,,..,,--:,, v/s Ratio Perm c0.19 Ni/c.iRatiii)_:::fi'::;I:F;.,:::',*:.'41-',i„;:'',':;Y:1:1'.,..',..:,;-=-.;.. -f-....::...'0$8Y.1.:.,2:,:r:::::::0-.:!:,--.,:n.i9:81,-;1::',--.::,10:44:::...:k:, ::::..M,,,.::,,=...:::-:'::!;k'e,:i'ig,:!;;-.:i.:,:,:i;::::::==:>!,::;4,7._::T::"-I;.=1:,4',;:-:;f:],:'.;:.•-._,::;-::::;D:'p?,,,,:±f.f.,1 40 Uniform Delay, dl 16.8 30.3 4.2 28.8 31.1 R.r;O:bie4iOhl:Fa'.8.tor 149--2::::!:•:.'-??;;';.:.g.:::',1;(p9, ;!;.:,i-1:00 ;: ',•:1,,..‘,-;-..-.'T,.-,::4,,...?,i.gf. ;2..?,',,..--,-,?,,,1:',..:=.5.-,,-,,,,ly.5.: ,-4:-.;.-.*7,...l , 9 ,1:90 Incremental Delay, d2 7.0 22.8 0.3 . 3.1 70.8 D614404..'''' '- -.4ei;f11.'if'..,':.,:?:::'1•.:',:',1:: ::..--...?....,•:238::;•;'.,:.,. ...:t4,:',1:::,--:,5 :0:il,':;,;::,i4 .3:y;-.:4-f:::::.,::;iii.:::.- -..?,,':i.,,7:::,-......nA-7:,.:;:::„t1..,;:i..:,,-,::-!;:,7.:::::: ?,%:::,:;:::::: ::.--::-...:.: 1-,,:9 ,::=101-..,9 Level of Service C D A C F Niii0406:0:61641sYi' s':-.,'J..i:a:;::5"-,,.,;:i.:",-..,go: ::::;:- .?.:.;-::v-iir:::::::i-:-:',;:-.-2=; .;,,,:19-.$A1:',.:,i4,i,:'•A::::.% i0.0 832 Approach LOS C B A F gi.i.erLsg.0.1.0).7.115.91Prt14.1-6iik'47:nlif.:&:.1f.:4q.:1'..:-;i :L ;:1,?:114.::;i:;i:`;;;1$?. .i.zi,'.1*."'Z'ir,:ti";,.fliki.if;':a:'4•4,.:'5"..4.14:=5-':.:Mte71141-2-,.7,446,511&:4=it'IraAti*,1 HCM Average Control Delay 36.6 HCM Level of Service D HCMA/i,oloiiie3to'L6bAditicfr4tio'Aii-',Vk;::::;. 0::92:::1:7-:-.V.:;,,,, .-.=::':-?;::,`.,.',..?::-. .j..1:.!'e... Actuated Cycle Length (s) 75.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 IntereectiOriy'CapariNiUtiliiation ',':'..ii.: '•:77.8°gf::',. ,-:_:.:::-::ICLJ•.L.:e.vel'ktiferyib4;:-:"':7'..-:::?::: .. P-:::.'-',..'s::,:-:-...-;1'...-"...:. ,'...':..'"' c Critical Lane Group Baseline Synchro 5 Report Page 1 KITTELPOR6-FF51 • • SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS r KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. Project Name: U a Agskr r•-.! ;ezOfte :- 1 610 SW Alder,Suite 700 Project Number: _ ! �� Analyst: a- •".f s� to Portland,Oregon 97205 Date: 1/12/2006 (503)228-5230 Filename: H.\projfile\7533-Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\excenTPR147533 Sig A.1 ,`'":. •-Fax: (503)273-8169 Intersection: i! Sii 7--i" lgier'8 s p Conditions(yr,alt.,etc.): to.'ota'Y=T ..."'1K -4 rPJGPeak.H.• r-at. GENERAL INPUT PARAMETERS: Cycle Length: r20°sec • Confidence Level C.L.: 1595 Storage Ien9thNehicle: ','. ( feet APPROACH/MOVEMENT #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 :T'-") €3af t_ras_ W= #N , ,.. BRT.Tt. 4' a, ;?m f I INPUT PARAMETERS:h 96 su u . X3 [$7 �s (P )( P ) �sx.. ,:.. , r - ;- :. � �...- 7,--14-''',- , G/C for movement .�.Di04 - 0 04 ' _ • 023 Number of lanes: )_�' ;�. '� ?�s�,-r�s:._.°"'Y� _; : ' � .,_... l' •J..z :..�_ CALCULATIONS: Length of red interval(sec): 115.2 115.2 92.4 92.4 I Average total queue(veh): 0.4 1.2 12.3 2.5 Maximum total queue(veh): 1 3 18 5 Total queue length(feet): 25 75 450 125 Required storage/lane(feet): 25 75 225 125 PERMITTED LEFT TURNS: , s R Opposing volume(pre-PHF): y. ' d 3= ' Opposing sat.flow rate: is r £, t s r mo :V , A _4 CALCULATIONS: Opposing flow ratio(Yo): Unblocked G/C: 1 Effective red interval(sec): Average total queue(veh): Maximum total queue(veh): • 1 Total queue length(feet): I Required storage/lane(feet): • METHODOLOGY AND FORMULAS USED: Length of red interval=(1-GEC)'Cycle length Queue length=Maximum queue'Storage length per vehicle Average queuelane=Volume'Red Interval/3600 Requved storage per lane=Queue length/Number of lanes,rounded up to the next highest whole vehicle Maximum queue Random arrival/Constant service Random arrivals behave accenting toe Poisson distribution Opposing lbw rato To=opposing volume ox/opposing sal lbw rale sop There is a probability equal to the confidence level desired le g 95%) that the queue lormed during each red interval wdl be less than Unblocked G/C(VC)=(gIC•Toy('-To) or equal to the maximum queue (Prob of arrivals=N)=(Red Irterval)'•N•exp(-N)/N! the Poisson distribution) . (Pob of arrivals>=N)=I-Sum of probabiities for vehicles 0,1. ,N-1 Max N Highest N such that the sum of probabilities>(I-confidence level) I 0 SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS Project Name: 91:4*B4iiikkaS-- eilyReidrie".1-,*-'..f',,,,..,1,--. ii,. ro- /4.7 r KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. Project Number: 7533 1'7,,',--', --,-;- g,r-4.44‘. '-,--, -=--.*r, rx 7 610 SW Alder,Suite 700 Analyst: ea ;-: -,,,,,-..-ilie'.'f---to---v2*; , --f,--Wco---,,,z7,- .1- 6r: Portland,Oregon 97205 Li 14::i'%.. Date: 1/12/2006 .,,,,t -zt (503)228-5230 Filename: H:\projfileg533-Opus NW Upper Baines Ferry Rezone■exceKTPR47533 Sig-. . --.. Fax: (503)273-8169 Intersection: Conditions(yr,alt.,etc.): ,2130Mitital-Wilffic4tWitikday7;MfRdaitiffotir14ft GENERAL INPUT PARAMETERS: Cycle Length: Confidence Level(C.L.): ,.-t,•-.M.-,/55....:4 Storage length/vehicle: Nr..' * feet — • I APPROACH/MOVEMENT #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #6 liTTERFerfirerRT-71T4-iMEM ii.P*Tai#,...ti;1*-71NI3111..-Z sil.-WBTA.M.MWT311rir477417.,,W., 1 . INPUT PARAMETERS: —775117 Volume(pre-PHF)(vph): S3 78Q -,• G/C for movement: •-,*,-.7. ,---1,---._....i . ,,, _a14..-:_!..f.40 riyi rge--440:a...81,,----1-g ,f,,,,, .3N-44.-41,7-42,tr-....-'a,4)..,1,J Number of lanes: :.:41')?--2.'"*. Ac:_44a12 4,1-2,-,,,, -2,-zt.,-7-,tAtpa:alv,-Arta--,:zvfo -cp?-1.....,,,,,tvAlcdti•WWW41: CALCULATIONS: Length of red interval(sec): 110.4 52.8 118.8 61.2 61.2 Average total queue(veh): 2.5 11.4 0.2 8.3 7.7 Maximum total queue(veh): 5 .17 1 13 13 Total queue length(feet): 125 425 25 325 325 Required storage/lane(feet): 125 225 25 325 325 PERMITTED LEFT TURNS: Opposing volume(pre-PHF): . `,.-"::-4,:,.,214,:f •...tf,*:*-71:*,...,-..i '4,:-...r..*;,,-;.,--4,4 ,..•**-:.,-.-:,-,--...;... r....,:f4-..•...-Z....1-, ,,:.-37-,1$1•"4:....ig •,,,,1/4. ...--„:4,--t. Opposing sat,flow rate: CALCULATIONS: Opposing flow ratio(Yo): Unblocked G/C: Effective red interval(sec): Average total queue(veh): Maximum total queue(veh): Total queue length(feet): Required storage/lane(feet): I _._ __ - _. - — ■ METHODOLOGY AND FORMULAS USED: Length of red interval=II-G/C)•Cycle length Oueue length=Maximum queue•Storage length per vehicle Average queue/lane=Volume'Red Interval/3600 Required storage per lane=Queue length/Number 01 0000.rounded up to the next highest whole vehicle Maximum queue Random arrival/Constara service Random arrivals behave according Ice Poisson distribution Opposing flow ratio Yo ri opposing volume./opposing eel flow rate sop There is a probability equal to the confidence level desired(e g 955) Ihet the queue loaned during each red interval will be less than Unblocked(VC(gu/C)ri(g/G.Yo)/(1-To) or equal lathe maximum queue (Prob of arrivals=N)=(Red IntervalrN'exp)-N)/NI (the Poisson distribution) (Prob of arrivals k=NI=1-Sum of probabilities for vehicles 0.1. ..9-1 Man N Highest N such that the sum of probabilsties a(1•cordidence level) o2co(v tubs_ 1 ckktric ?M Per... SimTraffic - H:\projfile\7533 -Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\Synchro\7533_TIA_2006.sy6 1/13/2006 !+ II Ii 1 Q.. 11 1 • co I I ° 95 'perce l;IL I I 0 I L 9 - - s co 11 C j j WESTbouNb 100611 m 11 CO X11 - (n II Li? kil (n I SW _ --- )r Boones Ferry Rd ,, �` , __ _�.__ SW Carman Drive _^ = = = = a = _ F I • Queue Lengths All Intervals I Color Queue Type I Average F7f1 95th Percentile , ® Max Observed Baseline H:\projfile\7533-Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone 1Synchro\7533_TIA 2006.sy6 ws2c Wed Jan 11, 2006 09:51:30 Page 1-1 ws2c Wed Jan 11, 2006 09:51:30 Page 2-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2021 Total Traffic Conditions -- Existing Zoning Wkdy PM 2021 Total Traffic Conditions -- Existing Zoning Wkdy PM Scenario Report impact Analysis Report Scenario: ws2c Level Of Service Command: ws2c Intersection Base Future Change Volume: ws2c Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in Geometry: with site 2021 LOS Veh C LOS Veh C Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee # 2 SW Upper Boones/SW Durham Rd C 30.9 0.703 C 31.0 0.707 + 0.101 D/V Trip Generation: .Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: with site # 11 Sequoia Pkwy/SW Upper Boones C 29.2 0.736 C 29.5 0.740 + 0.234 D/V Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes # 28 I-5 SB Ramp/Carman Drive E 62.2 1.082 E 63.8 1.088 + 1.674 D/V 111/ Configuration: ws2c • Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND H:\projfile\7533 - Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\traffix\ws2c.doc Page 1 of 4 Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND ws2c Wed Jan 11, 2006 09:51:30 Page 3-1 ws2c Wed Jan 11, 2006 09:51:30 Page 4-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 2021 Total Traffic Conditions -- Existing Zoning Wkdy PM Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2021 Total Traffic Conditions -- Existing Zoning Wkdy PM Level Of Service Computation Report - 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 SW Upper Boones/SW Durham Rd *********•*********•"`*****•"`************************************************ *********************************•*************************•*********•********** Intersection #11 Sequoia Pkwy/SW Upper Boones Cycle (sec) : 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.707 Loss Time (sec): 16 )Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 31.0 Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.740 Optimal Cycle: 73 Level Of Service: C Loss Time (sec) : 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 29.5 ******************************************************************************** Optimal Cycle: 79 Level Of Service: C Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road SW Durham Road *************`****"`*********`****`****"*******"******`*`**`***************** • Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Street Name: SW Sequoia Parkway SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ..I ..-_-II II II I Movement: L - T - R L .- T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected I II II II I Rights: Include Ovl Include Include Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I I II I I I Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Volume Module: I II II II I Base Vol: 131 294 3 49 152 247 471 463 229 5 181 20 Volume Module: Growth Adj: 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 Base Vol: 11 12 24 466 3 92 63 710 1 7 462 446 Initial Bse: 170 382 4 64 198 321 612 602 298 7 235 26 Growth Adj: 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 8 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 14 16 31 606 4 120 82 923 1 9 601 580 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 14 0 0 3 0 Initial Fut: 170 384 4 64 206 332 614 602 298 7 235 26 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Fut: 14 16 31 606 4 121 88 937 1 9 604 580 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 179 404 4 67 216 350 647 634 313 7 248 27 PHF Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Volume: 15 16 32 618 4 123 90 956 1 9 616 592 Reduced Vol: 179 404 4 67 216 350 647 634 313 7 248 27 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Reduced Vol: 15 16 32 618 4 123 90 956 1 9 616 592 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 179 404 4 67 216 350 647 634 313 7 248 27 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _I II II II 1 Final Vol.: 15 16 32 618 4 123 90 956 1 9 616 592 Saturation Flow Module: I II II II I • Sat/Lanne:: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.82 0.93 0.88 0.88 0.89 0.87 0.87 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lanes: 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.34 0.66 1.00 1.80 0.20 Adjustment: 0.90 0.85 0.85 0.93 0.93 0.83 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.96 0.82 Final Sat.: 1753 3467 35 1736 3473 1554 1769 2249 1112 1688 2994 331 ' Lanes: 1.00 0.33 0.67 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 I II__-.. II II I Final Sat.: 1702 538 1075 3494 22 1568 1655 3306 5 1736 1828 1554 Capacity Analysis Module: -'---I II II II I Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.12 0.12 0.04 0.06 0.23 0.37 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.08 0.08 Capacity Analysis Module: Crit Moves: "" ""' `"** **"` Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.18 0.18 0.08 0.05 0.29 0.29 0.01 0.34 0.38 Green/Cycle: 0.14 0.17 0.17 0.06 0.09 0.61 0.52 0.62 0.62 0.01 0.12 0.12 Crit Moves: **"* **" `** Volume/Cap: 0.71 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.71 0.37 0.71 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.71 0.71 Green/Cycle: 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.07 0.58 0.58 0.01 0.51 0.51 Delay/Veh: 57.7 49.1 49.1 71.2 60.6 12.3 24.6 11.9 11.9 79.0 56.9 56.9 Volume/Cap: 0.21 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.33 0.74 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.66 0.74 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 57.4 93.2 93.2 45.7 45.7 38.2 75.8 15.3 15.3 79.0 23.0 26.6 AdiDel/Veh: 57.7 49.1 49.1 71.2 60.6 12.3 24.6 11.9 11.9 79.0 56.9 56.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM2kAvg: 8 8 8 4 5 7 20 9 9 1 6 6 AdjDel/Veh: 57.4 93.2 93.2 45.7 45.7 38.2 75.8 15.3 15.3 79.0 23.0 26.6 HCM2kAvg: 1 3 3 12 12 4 5 10 10 1 17 18 H:\projfile\7533 - Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\traffix\ws2c.doc Page 2 of 4 Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND ws2c Wed Jan 11, 2006 09:51:30 Page 5-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2021 Total Traffic Conditions -- Existing Zoning Wkdy PM Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #28 I-5 SB Ramp/Carman Drive Cycle (sec) : 75 Critical Vol./Cap. IX): 1.088 . Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 63.8 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E • Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II II II I . Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected . Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 85 83 457 0 696 526 232 506 0 Growth Adj: 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 111 108 594 0 905 684 302 658 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 14 0 0 1 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 111 108 596 0 919 684 302 659 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 116 114 627 0 967 720 317 693 0 Reduce Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 116 114 627 0 967 720 317 693 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 116 114 627 0 967 720 317 693 0 II II II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 0.83 0.73 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.93 0.98 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.49 2.00 0.00 1.15 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 801 782 2786 0 1898 1413 1769 1862 0 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.23 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.18 0.37 0.00 Crit Moves: ++++ ++++ ++++ • Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.47 0.47 0.16 0.63 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.70 1.09 0.00 1.09 1.09 1.09 0.59 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.3 34.3 93.5 0.0 70.9 70.9 109.6 8.8 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.3 34.3 93.5 0.0 70.9 70.9 109.6 8.8 0.0 HCM2kAvg: 0 0 0 7 7 15 0 33 33 15 10 0 H:\projfile\7533 - Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\traffix\ws2c.doc Page 3 of 4 • • ws2p Wed Jan 11, 2006 09:51:03 Page 1-1 ws2p Wed Jan 11, 2006 09:51:03 Page 2-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2021 Total Traffic Conditions -- Proposed Zoning Wkdy PM 2021 Total Traffic Conditions -- Proposed Zoning Wkdy PM Scenario Report Impact Analysis Report Scenario: ws2p Level Of Service Command: ws2p Intersection Base Future Change Volume: ws2p Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in Geometry: with site 2021 LOS Veh C LOS Veh C Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee # 2 SW Upper Boones/SW Durham Rd C 30.9 0.703 C 31.3 0.720 + 0.388 D/V Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: with site # 11 Sequoia Pkwy/SW Upper Boones C 29.2 0.736 C 30.1 0.752 + 0.892 D/V Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes # 28 I-5 SB Ramp/Carman Drive E 62.2 1.082 E 68.3 1.104 + 6.086 D/V • Configuration: ws2p • • • • • • Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND H:\projfile\7533 - Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\traffix\ws2p.doc Page 1 of 4 Traffic 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND ws2p Wed Jan 11, 2006 09:51:03 Page 3-1 ws2p Wed Jan 11, 2006 09:51:03 Page 4-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 2021 Total Traffic Conditions -- Proposed Zoning Wkdy PM Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2021 Total Traffic Conditions -- Proposed Zoning Wkdy PM Level Of Service Computation Report . 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 SW Upper goones/SW Durham Rd ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 Sequoia Pkwy/SW Upper Boones Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.720 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 31.3 Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (x) : 0.752 Optimal Cycle: 75 Level Of Service: C Loss Time (sec) : 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay Isec/veh) : 30.1 Optimal Cycle: 82 Level Of Service: C Street Name: SW Upper Boones Ferry Road SW Durham Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Street Name: SW Sequoia Parkway SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Movement: L - T R L T - R L - T - R L - T - R Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound II II 1 Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected I II II II I Rights: Include Ovl Include Include Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I I I I I I Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Volume Module: I II II II I Base Vol: 131 294 3 49 152 247 471 463 229 5 181 20 Volume Module: Growth Adj: 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 Base Vol: 11 12 24 466 3 92 63 710 1 7 462 446 Initial Bse: 170 382 4 64 198 321 612 602 298 7 235 26 Growth Adj: 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 Added Vol: 0 5 0 0 34 45 7 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bee: 14 16 31 606 4 120 82 923 1 9 601 580 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 4 23 56 0 0 9 0 Initial Fut: 170 387 4 64 232 366 619 602 298 7 235 26 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Fut: 14 16 31 606 4 124 105 979 1 9 610 580 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 179 408 4 67 244 385 652 634 313 7 248 27 PHF Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Volume: 15 16 32 618 4 126 107 999 1 9 622 592 Reduced Vol: 179 408 4 67 244 385 652 634 313 7 248 27 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Reduced Vol: 15 16 32 618 4 126 107 999 1 9 622 592 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 179 408 4 67 244 • 385 652 634 313 7 248 27 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I „--- II II II 1 Final Vol.: 15 16 32 618 4 126 107 999 1 9 622 592 Saturation Flow Module: I II II II I Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.82 0.93 0.88 0.88 0.89 0.87 0.87 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lanes: 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.34 0.66 1.00 1.80 0.20 Adjustment: 0.90 0.85 0.85 0.93 0.93 0.83 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.96 0.82 Final Sat.: 1753 3467 35 1736 3473 1554 1769 2249 1112 1688 2994 331 Lanes: 1.00 0.33 0.67 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 I II II II I Final Sat.: 1702 538 1075 3494 22 1568 1655 3306 4 1736 1828 1554 Capacity Analysis Module: I II II II I Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.12 0.12 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.37 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.08 0.08 Capacity Analysis Module: Crit Moves: "** ***' **** **** Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.18 0.18 0.08 0.06 0.30 0.30 0.01 0.34 0.38 Green/Cycle: 0.14 0.18 0.18 0.06 0.10 0.61 0.51 0.62 0.62 0.01 0.11 0.11 Crit Moves: Volume/Cap: 0.72 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.72 0.41 0.72 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.72 0.72 Green/Cycle: 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.09 0.58 0.58 0.01 0.51 0.51 Delay/Veh: 59.0 48.1 48.1 69.1 59.9 12.4 25.5 12.3 12.3 79.6 57.8 57.8 Volume/Cap: 0.22 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.34 0.75 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.67 0.75 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.'00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 57.5 96.2 96.2 46.6 46.6 38.7 73.6 15.3 15.3 83.6 24.1 27.7 AdjDel/Veh: 59.0 48.1 48.1 69.1 59.9 12.4 25.5 12.3 12.3 79.6 57.8 57.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM2kAvg: 8 8 8 4 6 7 20 9 9 1 6 6 AdjDel/Veh: 57.5 96.2 96.2 46.6 46.6 38.7 73.6 15.3 15.3 83.6 24.1 27.7 HCM2kAvg: 1 3 3 13 13 4 6 11 11 1 17 18 H:\projfile\7533 - Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\traffix\ws2p.doc Page 2 of 4 Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KITTELSON, PORTLAND ws2p Wed Jan 11, 2006 09:51:03 Page 5-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #7533 Upper Boones Ferry Rezone -- Tigard, Oregon 2021 Total Traffic Conditions -- Proposed Zoning Wkdy PM . Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #28 I-5 SB Ramp/Carman Drive Cycle (sec) : 75 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 1.104 Loss Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 68.3 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 -I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 85 83 457 0 696 526 232 506 0 • Growth Adj: 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 111 108 594 0 905 684 302 '658 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 56 0 0 4 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 111 108 599 0 961 684 302 662 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 • PHF Volume: 0 0 0 116 114 631 0 1011 720 317 697 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 116 114 631 0 1011 720 317 697 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 116 114 631 0 1011 720 317 697 0 • I II II II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.0Q 0.83 0.83 0.73 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.93 0.98 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.49 2.00 0.00 1.17 0.83 1.00 1.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 801 782 2786 0 1939 1380 1769 1862 0 I II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.23 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.18 0.37 0.00 Crit Moves: *"`+ *i*+ ***+ Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.47 0.47 0.16 0.63 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.71 1.10 0.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 0.59 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.8 34.8 99.3 0.0 76.7 76.7 115.4 8.8 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.8 34.8 99.3 0.0 76.7 76.7 115.4 8.8 0.0 HCM2kAvg: 0 0 0 7 7 15 0 35 35 16 10 0 H:\projfile\7533 - Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\traffix\ws2p.doc Page 3 of 4 • • ,,,, ,-- . , -7 , </.)..u4i =Xi St vto, ,f,C;tfi.t,n ‘ HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis i _..J 9: SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd & 1-5 SB Ramp 1/13/2006 f -I• -NY C 41- Ak- 4\ t P \* 4' d N.40yOttieritit-fi:-!..>;e::4_1*.tt:Alglik-45.TRIT.EVP2.F.E3741,3,VTV:PETAY.LBV3.91011974:1191174,,V9EATA-N159 $-$1!-IMSE0-1374.7.$00 Lane Configurations tio . /I + 41 vv ro:op§:kcyomy:.:;i :',:‘:.'ek,.:::1900i:,1 9oo-,.,--;:,,,:poo,A=.4.9oo.,: o 909.i.;;op000gsoosi..rj;pcxyg,lsool.,t19,90::::,c_i-lpop:,:::-oppo Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.6 !!k0610jji4g00P1R:'3-ri';'r*- 14C7. 1'Pg-'-!N:it,--PigiV9p 6:00051-n*-,i,,;:Aigio:,,t,,,::,!-41.0.K.i;?..,::.,ff.e4,:g:4,-::,,,I)::./z-::,::,5 9::::1--i,P15 Frt 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 6!g074§"-0: W45.99 * iz•9 . ,,. , w ....„,,ot7psm,wob Satd. Flow (prof) 3313 , 1770 1863 1817 2787 rItiPettfilfifedIrM.',.4i.,;, ,Aggi,IfIlf.o.:61t,-;twvp.,ym:7,ocigx0-ozsiiligig,ioi;::md,:;-:.*: ....................................... Satd. Flow (perm) 3313 1770 1863 1817 2787 :\li.§**('•$*1)ViC:21i :0:: "::?,P4,-':3':',.410::::gif0..§4AA..Pg!: ,:g.PO :' ,,,;-,::::C.;•R9:::,,,.::::',:-:2,:.:f,,,:•:g0,?.,::: :•,):?:;,,;=::::.411:;:i'.:74;-.Tos., 4;t$96 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ACP(*(4)C.:::::'-fi ,i :,::,,i. ;:,3,;(j:;, 98"1:-,-;,,,,;: g0j..k4;-.:p; :',.,:094:v..,:„:;.,„-.: 0r,m;:,:e706?,,,,,=,.:-:‘,,,;0;F:,,,,:i-. J::,0:_1,: :.:,.1.21 7 ' ',''''14,0,1:;"i:.-;;:i;627 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1687 0 318 694 0 o 0 0 0 231 627 4.64V.VO4bioie'6,(;,h) ,';-,1,:':::',.:..-b*-....::,::::;:•,.:2 ),:::'::,, ,,ig, ,k:-:‘,,.4,.',.,%,..',„,47.0%'0;-,.;',.'o'9./4:',,•!,i-,::0,W,:E:,•:,-;••,0%;,,-;'"':!.--2°/:-:,,";:',-;;:; ,',.2-,%::-.,,':4,;f2% Turn Type Prot Split Perm Rii0600=.P:1504 6 5,:•„:::-.• I:ryt;21,,IM::::Tf:,,:_;:n,,,'„;;_4:;!_',,-,..-:,.:,,,ki-.,,,-:,:..:,.! ..,:: , :;,,,;:,i13 , :.&B Permitted Phases 8 ACfpated,-,,,p.reeof,!;,a),($) ,,;•_:':- --•::;;;!,:-..,:,-,,:,.,11-iff:_.,,, .-,y,I..,,,:,;II,:........3.0-,.::„. L, .__:., .,,i,,..,,:i,,, -:-,-, ,,-;:„,-,,,,..-:::,,,,,,,,:„., „,:.:,.,,,,, ,.,-.,,-_-,. :,.:711:.9 13 Effective 'Green, g (s) 36.1 13.0 53.1 13.9 13.9 AOtyat04-,g/qRatior.::.-, ,., ,,,,:::,' ,.,, '0,4s-:,,;:,,,,,,. -2::,..,;:!,p.1 T,,...:,,,o.:74,....,. .:-„•,,. ,':'..,.,::: ::::::,:::._„,,„„,,'; ;.:::,:fs::„,:. :.. ,! :,:', :: :::o.1 p :,:0:19 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 VehicIO°'ate6§ionls:)':;I, ',1,7-:: . ::;3:5: ':: ,,: 7,V,:3:0 :,:".',',11:a.5 c:::.:,:',‘.,...-,Y,.'::?1,;"--,'•,--_,..:',7-"::;,,,':' ;,'..:;:71--' '':;,,::. ;.:,;,,,,-::'" :: :'2:5':,` ',.,.‘2;',5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1595 307 1319 337 517 y4f.11ifiiiMr60. -,:', '',,':: ', '-'.:::,,,':':i:dOW:1',:, :,.:-:,:;c.,::.:.'do•Ais:E:',.[::..t:17/7.:.-4',,:i7',;:::::_i !,T.:-.';',,•:,',:•=.;:':::. ,,:--,-,'::.-..',.':,'-:-,T, ..::",'':' : ,,'- ', :::0'.1:-.3-'„:"::'5J;:,..: • Nits Ratio Perm c0.23 . ,, , ,,, „ „, , :,,,,„ , . , , . ,, _, , .., ..„.,_ Ni/c!:Ratio.:k'!:,":/::Ai :; ''','!,';::::-:.,!.".,,' :,,'..,:: 'Hi=los,•",: i:,::- .::::-41,:.:w:o4-:-a9:p. :,-,',:::-,-...'Y.;,.':-., "-.':':,:'''_.-.:.:'.'',: -:'''-:':,!:''''''':-'1:-:"?::: :"; :5 o:69..--,,:.i,,,1:•:21 Uniform Delay, dl 19.4 31.0 5.1 28.5 30.6 RiAbre0O6,,,‘Octor f r i i 0 a-,- :=.:..-,.:_, 0 01(:,;::. :c:_=: :::,:1::,':::: 1:::tio.:',. -;;•:4-,O0 Incremental Delay, d2 39.5 61.0 0.4 5.2 112.6 „ Delay(s) .. ::, ".:,:::;,,, _:: . . :"., .,i.59;0:::::..,:i:::,:::::,:;192.9',,c;,:::;.:5.$:! ,.; •>:-:,:.;i:23!.=, ;:,-,,: 7,:::,-;;:l.,•.:,,,,:1:-::,,., ..,,,,,:: :, _. ,: :,i „:::;s:p7•,:_,;143.2 Level of Service -- F A c F Af.004Ch.::DOlayAs) - : „,.. .,:::,:,,r.. ': 9:0 T, „ I 3t 2 r 't , 0.0 1 cz,1_,'. .7 Approach LOS E C A F Vf - MSM' ineiszl ; aziA ;2 1::',f•-,•'i,sFWak7fiFnSIf#frYra , ... HCM Average Control Delay 64.7 HCM Level of Service E ItIgivfNolurile'to:Capacity:ratio ': .'-. ., : 'il.;:09.',7., ' -. :-',.:::;,r;-''',' ':'-' .:,,;,. .=::::';:.,,:' '-'-: .'.',' : --, •:,:: -:,,,:".,::;•:: _.' .' '' :..-:.';•,,,:.: ::, Actuated Cycle Length (s) 75.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Ihteth6btion';Oapacity.-Utiliiation 89:9% -. -:.:ICU Level of Service . D c Critical Lane Group Baseline Synchro 5 Report Page 1 KITTELPOR6-FF51 0 • • ,',,q)2. ?cod. Z.brt:4d't HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd & 1-5 SB Ramp 1/13/2006 • f -0' - r C 4- k- 4\ t P \* 1, d N400riir4i-Tt:;:';;w ..4I:q:l:- k::;,.;:':i..EF_3Ti-ft;ti.Fo:B:g'ioy:f3r;. -maj:--t,5vvpi3:,-xtm7-ig-ifipYstftfoRsw-js:-s-TcqTttBF3 Lane Configurations •t+ 4 Ideili;001±i(007#01)-,0fiSi1.013o 99.00 900'51r0003:10.00 L51....9130f- 900:.-4119.00T!:',:f1P00,';71-900.:1;. 1 02,0:g9:90 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lir,*0l,'-F4c10r1;: V:Ti;:-V--:'-,;'r-;,WAP.)':'9'.5x51,5AVI:1100R;Tk174WM;:k'.i,'r -:;iKCIKfnIZ':gtg:'r.jfgQO:ffi-g.b:160 .., - .,. ... En 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 . .'---- 'I'-'--.:;,-z'Ai. ,:.::.:-;...;z,:::,,V-6='-''"'"" '' 0.'"' "`"."''''''''* '' 4' ' "P- ''' ' '"V 8,''''i-' '66 ritTrctO9i41:54ti.13;;;P :A?::;;:1-,1.:-.99,:,:il!.A:i:::v,-,,,,,,,:,, :95,0E9 ,:„,,i,,,m,2,1,,.t.,,,,,„.„-v,„,,,,,,,„1„:„.„41,„.„..?„,„,:•,,,•:,,,:•,„,,,i,40-„,_ 9 ;,,,:-.4,,.: Satd. Flow(prot) 3319 , 1770 1863 1817 2787 FX170iti404ga::'.‘Pf,gi0?:giW-M9AW::•°R;AVOL. 5::;;:ig.;11gPAX,!-.4,0X,:r, :dA:,•-:-,, ,,::,-;•::':,f;C:V,V-g':,?,;-!:.:,.:::44:;V::::: .-9-!,04f4.:;,1'0, Satd. Flow (perm) 3319 1770 1863 1817 2787 V.6104014taArf,:;;;Vrc..e.,7,,,f4:10:49:6K0"664e3!:7PgS:'06?V'ag;I'Ai.7,-;!: ,P-MilY.11Pg. :4)..j:'' 'Alr.-Ate196.,g; 599. Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Acii12:510yv,-:(*),?::;.- -::•Rk;;,:d":W.-'.Z..0:t-'4pfg:,?-4;':44-4-moi,ct,:;::kom. .N5i;o:?.p,;!5:•;'ii,lorfr, 4 t:f:-:;i:E:i:i ..#.:Qisitil§50:4440:0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 1732 0 318 697. . 0 0 0 0 0 231 631 Hea4A/Ohiolei:)1(P/0):'S'jt,,f=',,..Y•,Y'0%-k.: 2P/c;.:,i',;,:',1-.2!/..i..:,t:-:,:::2')%p.. .,'.';', . --r:Y9 0°14 ,-,;.:'-,•::;',::;(1,%6--J.:`,i-S.:,,'',.0°/c;'iT:i''.'f,:.0%. ,----.::::":0%c;:;:.:,•:',':--2f)/4,i'.,-='.`.f---' 9%0 Turn Type Prot Split Perm Protected Phases i--;;;,;..,-,:.:.::,',-.-.:6'..',..-.::!?:';':.,r1:.-::: :.:4.::.: 5,.:J.:", ',-2-:.:!5-,:,.; '.::;.'i':"i,,J:f.:',Xt=':--1-:-:,',. .5'r:IN:!'::,'''';','-, .,:,i-:,. :,,:.----1,: ::'.;;P:',A,', .--A Permitted Phases _ 8 ActUate(1;:G TepI;.-pils);..i.:,.,:,,;:ri,;:,;.::;.,:;;;. 360::: ,:;,:,,-;,-:!::::;17,A-a:A,..- -...5 :1 :i:i.':ii-.:::;;;,:••::;!.. ]:.V,.--,-, :‘:'ci',:.'4=.•;:';::::::-',':E:.:::,i-.,:j!=,. ;. :::-•,::-13'.9.[i,:',13..9, Effective Green, g (s) 36.1 13.0 53.1 13.9 13.9 Actuated.6/„P'110iio :,... '.,;...=;,. ::,,.' ,,,:,,‘04&;.!:-... , --, .,,*±0:1-7.,.: .,..0.71.-:,.,•.:s7;:,;•:.,:,;.,::,,,:.,:.•,,-..:: :-.:•„-:,,..:.;,..,j,-. :::::,,:,,:,:,..,'-',:,,::,..„.... ,.,'0:1:9 :::::0 A 9 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehitle.EitensiOft.(S) -;!!,:---:'-'- :_••:-7•,:::;.:.-• -rC 3:5•;:•:::'5,:' : ..,--,:h,-.--:.10:',,:',i.::::0.5F,,i'slti=--.' ,•-•,-:':••',:."j'; : -.•}'...]:.;:n,...,f'-'.:: 2:5::::=7;:::2-2?:-5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1598 307 1319 337 517 y/s!..patioi.prOf.7-::K:',.:•:-::1•: ,,:-,N-::-.:::::;,.:::::t:po::5g:::i:::.'•: • ,'"ii:::::co.)t3;.,::;.;A$7.:'::::'.:'-.-;:''i::.:=';,::: =::-,..--:.:,,i':-,4.1'..,' .::::=!.=..":;"-,:;,-::•:'.::,=. . ::'',..•-:,::,.:,,,‘0:13 v/s Ratio Perm c0.23 v/c-R at i o :•:;::;•:1'.P8.:;,,,::: .:---,'k-i-,::-1304,- •.:9:53,':,4.-;:i,-.-;':1?::;-.:::a:.;k::,-:.:„.,::::::":::,;4:`,2.::.'..'-:;!.; .:: :, :--..,.':.:.,:::•:,,:: :.,0:69,.f,..-:1-:-2 Uniform Delay, dl 19.4 31.0 5.1 28.5 30.6 PrpresSiOn:-.F4tot..,.:.,.x-,,-..:,-,,,:-.::,.0.:.,.F.4 TIOlp,..-._-:;--,:,,,-•.:,::_.T.00,,ss..11:(X)_,,f,„:,...i , ...-_,-,:-.--v.:,:,:!:-:-..fr ,- ,-,.•:f-.,,:-.:::.,-,:..,,,:--,,.:1-:0Q--:::,--.:1-.:00 Incremental Delay, d2 49.0 61.0 0.4 5.2 115.7 Delay(s) :"-:,.,. ::::;.:.!',68:'..4:'!;‘, ',. "•:- :1,;:92,:o 2:....:,;,..=.,..5-.:5:.,:.,,:.:;,;:,::i::;:.,i,....:y,'„a:,.:::::,,.: .,;,:i.:,'...?„,...:„.:.,;:::!k':.::y y::::.i:;:,-.....30' .! :1 46 3 Level of Service E F A c F Apckcipdtiper.40s)i:'',.:_.,Z,--'-'',.s:'i.s•••:,..;,::..:.•4884:,:.:!:,-. ;.-,,,;,„:.:,.,..::;;',-.'1,-7::;"s-:0216;.'.: :-... .,- , ,',- .,:;-:,.i0.0 .-F. ;=.Z.:.,:...:,' ,.. ',-, . .116.1 ';'.,-.:":".-:-... • Approach LOS - E C A F lbfe.f00i:O*S.Rrtirt.j.a.kYc':..!',','..frkrZ::'-C1'5. t'P:,._r_?::rtt•f- -,. .k,i, i.:v....:- =T.'1:?!7,'il_: :i'.i'k- i'i_:f;',5''g=N. ;.'.,f;zk,7Z:6:.tia,V4--g-fkr HCM Average Control Delay 69.7 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume:4:6 Capacity ratio '.k:'.. :'. :. .:,:..11-0!..:,: c:" :- ...;:::.;::,i':: ::•:r.:::Ui: :.! :::-...:::"'..,.'.::if.., ----:,..:::::i'i.:-:;:.1.-• :1- -::-:-z.::-..::•::----.---;:...;,•••:,1 - -.: ...:''[... •... Actuated Cycle Length (s) . 75.0 ... Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersedtkinr.,..0apadity:Utilization ' • -911°/9:-.....'":.' ICU Level of Service:::-'. '1,., '.-..::• - - f..'-.:-'E.--. '''..-'''•' -•.'-''.•. ' c Critical Lane Group Baseline Synchro 5 Report Page 1 KITTELPOR6-FF51 0 • , 202.1 rel>eu,s,e.a ao K.2,14.5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd & 1-5 SB Ramp RO- 1, ,-.A i Eb 1/13/2006 f C 4-- 4%-- 4\ t P \* IT I rifid.WitOgit,'Zg.,40,.S-2-g -lik-4 .E59:24-1WI3ViN665517, A431I:VAINIc-;!,If.M371SIN.0.9415k.S.P..I_ZiiST3iTP:RSEIPTI. Lane Configurations 0 ii + 4 VV Ideal;;Froilvliiiifii5i) 1900e:17.1§001=4n.il1c9001900.:!:',f1 koFitt 900'a,t900 fi1i000:TA:000 1900='%190I: o'0 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 L'Oh.'.e44:7.!--4.4f0t4Wijlia.q.VOkir'q?".9.:$71MW.V.list*C9R40.,.A1P:MtagitUailla5-...-4-a;11.---;:=:5:ilsg11;:f.:Wil,100:44,:f0.4§ Frt 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Oter60,Of00AM.;^§k:4';:,4;;Zietii-e1,=',903% -:-Vail,:::9'..P55,t7,499:i&O,'::: ::4&i:':a::ii,*=,?- . .V.:'.-'0a-V,I=A;k: '91... 190 Satd. Flow(prot) 3319 1770 1863 1817 2787 OfTPelf.ri.),1. ...403ifiliVAI:Ot'' V,PQC:si.W:rif:AWM-.M6;i ::;IrtalR004'...k:.a.:k::?;'5,. .:-:;3---: : 4:'A`Y'":99AteMP:9 Satd. Flow (perm) 3319 1770 1863 1817 2787 vOluiiigOip110i.W11,,y;gIO:--4j.: 01.--'::e' 4:te-tal9z-eit c'§§?.gtmilfVOicN16414T.A.:I'.4- 40.1:riV't:1PP4A' 99 Peak-hour factor, PI--IF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 AOF'000017;il':`6i.A, '-::• .-'2:'4Y,'„Q-.:,:',,:j'Ot?..''..":;i:720,';'•'i;'_.'': 1;::.O.::.,s;''A:,,Q9LTJ'..:,;''..::::•,;jt?;:'tWcj2::I:0-:,9";'g':::?l:-''.'",A:'.:::':,:):IVZj::;::',.A1:k-i::':'OP1: Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1732_ 0 318 697 0 0 0 0 0 231 631 Hea*:,..V,Oh.,:iCIO09/6): ;2.3:.!.`4':.,'0%-i::::',cf,'..::,-2W.V.Y:i.";R,%."iaii:f2-kr,;:'. .Wii::: :0°/4:144,i?f0°44z:b•:!:: 0%Vi.10%t--:;;,,-..-:2,94 ,.=:,=,5:' %..Z,74-5,24'6, Turn Type Prot Split Perm 13,rotea4p*ogyo,., -.-.:pj-::,:;:•?:::--- --.: 6 ...-i:;:::„*.;,':::ig5-::':,,, •;;,-2,;:`,. .::::::,.::!';p:::::,.a:-,:',„:.it';':,: a ,;-, , :8 :=4::',.;;..i::::;.8.':!..M.A.,:A=- Permitted Phases 8 ACtEiatOGieen; i10) '-:::.'f'f,'=;;-'':.,-,:-.;;•: ',-01.6'''.9‘:.- -: H:.::',E..":-:::4610 .:'•-:66-:9':' ,'.;.: ,-..311.4r-,,,..:;,:',=:1;f ::,:g-i:;•.."•:•:,,,-..:,, q';i:,.,-_-.-:.::.';:.:.,.:•..;.,:•,':.,.1'8.1:::::F-:;:.:.1 80 Effective Green, g (s) 46.9 16.0 66.9 15.1 15.1 kd*to,-;:§7-q:Flafio::,,,::--:•••:1;-•::::,::i.-:,-.•,.,0 52::-.,:-,:•,.•: :!..,-,:,:;:;,-ff-:.0.10.,..-,r,...og.:4:-;;.:: :,......,:::.,7.ii:,. :::-;-;-,41:::::i.i4.,; ,,i-:::::A/,-., :::::.•: .• ..•..:.:•-•:::::-•-:;:-...oz.hz.,:f,i0-rilq. Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 V0hiele;.8346116ion0) ''...:35:: ':::‘....:: '.,,'.,•.1: -...,:i3i.l:Y:Y.:r:•ra:LA'.:7,..,,_,,,,-:::::::.: ::,,,..::.!:,r,.:::, :ii:, ••::,•:.':•:::;',.-,v•i:-=:::r e,,::r: :::.: -,"..?:":;a5::',;;:. :-2,2:5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1730. ... 315 1385 305 468 Vi: .:Flatiii0iPcliPV-:;: ‘:'' .,';;‘*;:-?::::..- 'i..-co.52..-... ;,,:.::-';.;:;:ir.r:'i.c0A 8'.:::':•:•::D-:8-77 ' t - '. • - :.;.?..;.:, '0:1-3 v/s Ratio Perm . c0.23 ‘;j6a.„10ktfOli:;,.,VF.5,-Q--;,1:,!..;:,- -!::,:.: :::;.::", -.-:--1:00.,,,,' i ::::4;:;-,;::::Y:roi::::=,,:o-:-50,,,,i.y,,:.,::,,:;,:: .. ..1:::• ,..,,:. 1--:i-.1-..,,. .,--,,--:.-r,,.:•.::,.',,.;..:•.:•••••:•:,07 : ::,:.:,1::;;$ Uniform Delay, d1 21.6 37.0 4.7 35.7 37.5 Ri•dgrO010.6i.F.-400!"'::,,'.. ',.:•1..',.,-,‘., . ' .1';00..'...-,.-:';',•:..::'•,::;.:I....pp -: ..,1:00,-;.:;!.?:..'s': !,=-:.i'?,,':::: :4,,::!.;::::::::, .--:;:!.:.: ,:::.':"".. T. ::,:',;,::,::.,'-...-1:::Do-p:s:.1.:f00 Incremental Delay, d2 21.9 53.1 0.3 9.8 170.4 1--?eigkOnePSP'4:-VC.:-':..';;-..2::'!,..::..'.!::''',, ,43:5 *,':90:);-10.,:-.-.rf;54 -;;;;..:,: .::-'.!:::;:0-7i:-:iN..::::,.:::.',---_:::::.",.,:s.-;- '':: :..,-.; :..1;,;=.4"4.5!5 :',209 Level of Service D F A D F AppidObiDelAY(s) 43.5:. .;::....-,,,:,;':::::::,4!;,:,:,'..-;31,:t.j.;:::i-...i..*4i.„'..::•;i:;,',.:',:•...1;:b.0 , '...:;:--.-:.:::•.,:-.....- .:::;,';.:..:1644 Approach LOS D C A F kifdttettiOKIS:eirbrf,*tYA:CrtekiSWI---k.t.%' g:ASigit'tVFSVMAVali,;i42igla:•tgqAftCAPZ;Sfh:g;tIS,ra . HCM Average Control Delay 69.0 HCM Level of Service E 141CM*610n)0-4&,caliacitwr.atio .. .. .: -::-. .:-1 07 3--:7;-:::.:..,,-,.:'.i'...;,.:.,:... .-:.,:."::::::1;;;:Z.:,, ,:g.: :.•.i.:::: : -.:.'..'-:::• '-..,-,.'......:,:,-.:.-,7.:: ''.,:-..:::i::-;:.ji.",'....-:..."'.:2"_,.:-:,,:=:c.!-..< Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 I ntetseetiori'QaciadityInilization - .9111% ', :::'-:•'..:-ICUrLevekofff-SOn./ibe'::" ...'- -:;. ,:ii .'-.::E ' ..:.:.:-.'s'•",:::.-: .--'• .''.':•-: c Critical Lane Group Baseline Synchro 5 Report Page 1 KITTELPOR6-FF51 SimTraffic- H:\projfile\7533- Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\Synchro\7533_TPR_Existing_2021.sy6 1/12/2006 • .2o21 EX15tivy ZOYavto). \ A II 1 q * 11 a_ I I ° 1D - ieccePM\e— Q • CO II E II CiJBV 4. .D I I ipE T80VND'fttQ.OUCoF4 I I LL C CT II m " II � el t U) ;r Boones Ferry Rd . SW_ - - _ - _ '\ SW _Carman Drive — — — ± :1-,r - Queue Lengths I • All Intervals I Color Queue Type I El Average I N 95th Percentile I ® Max Observed Baseline H:\projfile\7533 - Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\Synchro 17533_TPR_Existing_2021.sy6 SimTraffic-H:\projfile\7533-Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\Synchro\7533_TPR_Proposed_2021.sy6 1/12/2006 [202-i ?crPa zD >, 0_ I I., ,q5 - t-ahl eS -� WESTeofND TµRouC&Ii (o 1 I II irl (I) 11 � 1 � LO ir ►W Upper Boones Ferry Rd , SW —_— '� _ SW Upper Boones FE - - x -- - - - •_ I In — •Queue Lengths All Intervals Color Queue Type . 0 Average 'rR 95th Percentile I ® Max Observed I I Baseline H:\projfile\7533 - Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\Synchro\7533_TPR_Proposed_2021.sy6 • • SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS Project Name: pper=SooRes_F<e 'i3 KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC.• V , -s Project Number: 7533s � 610 SW Alder,Suite 700 Analyst: J3 s Portland,Oregon 97205 Date: 1/12/2006 f� (503)228-5230 Filename: H:(proifile\7 n 533-Opus NW Upper Boos Ferry Rezone\excenTPR47533 Sig-. J„ ,—. Fax: (503)273-8169 Intersection: DuitrantjR -•. �IJp =r.rkti Y- sws +n:-xc..m a`�-.'�•'.4.Ni`-'U.'h�fTSV �-"bdc=4 Conditions(yr,alt.,etc.): 25121 TptalZaf 1,1-r ifafir. xiaSiifr Cr „!'- GENERAL INPUT PARAMETERS: Cycle Length: i sec + Confidence Level(C.L.): r. 3'851 Storage length/vehicle: 25 feet J • APPROACH/MOVEMENT #1 #2 #3 #4 • #5 . #6 #7 #8 I. • ir”-�6" _. �,:'a�- :*FB. -7.-#4 INPUT PARAMETERS: - EVE:nt(vph) 1 ' i =6 �,'2 su x .-.061' ie 2: kz = ,.:, -_ 1 f` - 1. .'5 k Y r a`l- -j IV CALCULATIONS: Length of red interval(sec): 103.2 99.6 112.8 109.2 46.8 57.6 45.6' Average total queue(veh): 4.9 10.7 2.0 6.2 4.3 9.8 11.41 Maximum total queue(veh): l 9 16 5 11 8 15 17i Total queue length(feet): 225 400 125 275 200 375 4251 Required storage/lane(feet): 1 225 200 125 150 200 375 225 PERMITTED LEFT TURNS: Opposing volume(pre-PHF): :n»F_; -3 .•Y.-ta .y's. l*;ittv';...s• ;e• -.,a re. Opposing sat.flow rate: ':— • ,T ,»'r.:, , i CALCULATIONS: Opposing flow ratio(Yo): Unblocked G/C: i • Effective red interval(sec): Average total queue(veh): Maximum total,queue(veh): I Total queue length(feet): Required storage/lane(feet): METHODOLOGY AND FORMULAS USED: Length of red interval=(t-0/C)'Cycle length Oueue length=Maximum queue'Storage length per vehicle Average queue/lane=Volume'Red Interval/3600 Required storage per lane=Oueue length/Number of lanes,rounded up to the nee highest whole vehicle Maximum queue.Random arr'rval/Conslant service Random arrivals behave according toe Poisson distribution Opposing lbw ratio Yo=opposing volume vo I opposing sal lbw rate sop There is a probability equal to the con(iderx:e level desired(e g 95%) Ihel the queue formed during each red interval will be less than Unblocked CJC(gu/C)=(glC-50)1(1-Yo) or equal to the maximum queue (Prob of arrivals=N)=(Rod Interval)W'exp(-N)/NI (the Poisson distribution) (Prob of arrivals on N)=1-Sum of probabilities for vehicles 0,I,.,N-I - Max N•Highest N such that the sum of probabilities>0-confidence level) • • SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS _ .„,.... Project Name: gur-ii,!-,r.Z0iik-'=''':::-.:::;::4,--r.- -q.;- ,,,2 /,,,..lw KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. Project Number: """'"'"' 7'.,rnei. ' , .1 ..,: ,..,,,t .4474,A*1.' 4,749v,er 610 SW Alder,Suite 700 44,-,,.t..-..tt, •. .t7:.---...t--44-.., 't Analyst: 6.21L41,-.7`..,.-II424.-...i., 41.74: ....;,:z rt.4 44 Portland,Oregon 97205 Date: 1/12/2006 • mt ■-q), (503)228-5230 Filename: H:\propile VS33-Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone\exceNTPR17533 Sig P. ...Fax: (503)273-8169 Intersection: Piii:Itt#: .Aj•:AciPM-1/7= Conditions(yr,alt.,etc.): .ollgt•otiekalfiakWit10.M. 140iittotita) GENERAL INPUT PARAMETERS: Cycle Length: Confidence Level(C.L.): Storage length/vehicle: o vo4sec 4..,:g,„ -61faL !feet 1 , APPROACH/MOVEMENT #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 claVi§UM7,1-ARTA"1"i=riggYgliainialgiMil . .,:::. t:4,,r*Cii, ',. *:,2:;45',:i; , ,INPUT PARAMETERS: I Volume(pre-PHF)(vph): M.";,t17 :r r' ::c.,;;;; it 1 ::::...,•.—:;.474..M. 4,447,C.,;. ::. -,-,4A.,44•,,A..1..-rc.,r,m,,,,:;%,--to.,,:-,-.4:111w,.,.. ..L..4.„.4,,,-, ...,,.1,,,,,;•,,twr, rthrA,..,.•-7,„--1-::...•..,4,..:47-..:• aSleg.:ii,44..e;74,---A.Le...:-'', ,,•-..;-xivz-42,p1.4 G/C for movement: i...,,,a74.,-61,:,,,,,v,„ a al:.., ::.,,,,,m1.4 via.„„.- ,i4.,,„.. ,,,,,,,i„.,,,,,zw.- -.;...94-i-kgr,„,:,,,,, 4-,..n... ,;:%,114.--,--:-. 4 .".- tsF112—;. ft,.=:.aztf"a*,,, ,.3.,4,,,,--Atie: Number of lanes: t.2:71!..,,,-7-re..-t.':',ie: ,,7°4 r#7.S7q7:-',4°.:.4."FTV.74,*.N.,_if;*14., ;',74"-z?"::-i-.,:. „..'' ,.,7''''',',-'4r.)..,...4,,.M, 1 1 1 : CALCULATIONS: Length of red interval(sec): 118.8 105.6 Average total queue(veh): 0.2 7.7 1 Maximum total queue(veh): 1 12 I Total queue length(feet): 25 300 Required storage/lane(feet): 1 25 150 1 'PERMITTED LEFT TURNS: , 1 Opposing volume(pie-PH F): t24 AAi';',,t -./ 12.-:,; It -,-'4:2-4 :.4',---t.A r .-.- E," .::. ..--..t. . :::;Tit.,.....-.4v, 1 Opposing sat,flow rate: .;: .r.:77^1:3:414. 0..'v„litz.i2 ' ! , CALCULATIONS: I • , Opposing flow ratio(Yo): Unblocked G/C: Effective red interval(sec): Average total queue(veh): Maximum total queue(veh): 1 1 1 Total queue length(feet): 1 1 Required storage/lane(feet): I 1 METHODOLOGY AND FORMULAS USED: Length ol red interval=(1-G/C)•Cycle length Queue length=Maximum queue"Storage length per vehicle Average queueflone=Volume•Red Interval/3600 Required storage per lane=Queue length/Number ol lanes,rounded up to the next highest whole vehicle Maximum queue Random anivaVConslant service Random arrivals behave according to a Poisson distnbulion Opposing Bow ratio Yo=opposing volume cot opposing sat llow rale sop There is a probability equal to the conlMence level desired(e g 95%) that the queue Formed dunng each red interval will be less than Unblocked G/C(gu/C)=(g/C-Yoy(1-Yo) or equal to the maximum queue (Prob ol arrivals=N)=(Red Irdervaly`N•exp(-N)/111 (the Poisson distribution) (Prob ol arrivals>=.N)=1-Sum of probabilities lor veNcles 0,1, N-1 Max N Highest N such that the suer ol probabilities>(1-cordidence level) • • • SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS Project Name: 70i4Witia6fitisay-TteziliaTI 4,4..,-,—— ' --az Fil /‘,,g,7,,,,,," KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. Project Number: 753 a.4-W _ :' ...,, -..„L-... zr-..,..;„, - ..._. 610 SW Alder,Suite 700 Analyst: Ci3TA', -1..,,, ,. 1—f.lr..z... ..-,,;,-.1, ,'''-..141-r,:"..1 ..-"Q: .-...., Portland,Oregon 97205 Date: 1/12/2006 Affr-..-- (503)22B-5230 Filename: HApropileV7S33-Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry RezoneeexceNTPR17533 Sig_. .4'7 . --. .Fax: (503)273-8169 Intersection: PIWIf rogIT :-liPW r-50610:kg§-01 Conditions(yr,alt.,etc.): te&10otaltitifk...itiga01/111r,thp'died:Nail GENERAL INPUT PARAMETERS: ' Cycle Length: ,i:AT.H120 sec Confidence Level(C.L.): Storage length/vehicle: --v.:..,Itt- ,..4,&=rtrol-26 feet . • APPROACH/MOVEMENT . #1 #2 #3 . #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 BUTTh- l*:- SBIBT-iz:77.-17E1311TF41 FilEurVint-7 INPUT PARAMETERS:• Volume(pre-PHF)(vph): Or'fffl?{°:,.T.:::., f:t. ..,A-, .NA.«.g.1.,7,.-;ty.4-4:E4.vt-y.,':-7:......,.. 3 flistSt V'frw0 ,r 0 G/C for movement 014 0i i ' iii PXail 2;.r -% a1& 052 r-'40 Number of lanes 2 ,1•1•:',..47—`1,'ii.::r-'7.t'An".'''7,17- -`.•tF!`r:r".;".*":',:t^:":7,,,i...-.r.*,.4..tF7 2 CALCULATIONS: Length of red interval(sec): : 103.2 98.4 112.8 108.0 46.8 57.6 45.6 Average total queue(veh): 4.9 10.7 2.0 7.0 4.8 9.9 11.4 Maximum total queue(veh): 9 16 5 12 9 15 17 Total queue length(feet): : 225 400 125 300 225 375 425 Required storage/lane(feet): 225 200 125 150 225 375 225 PERMITTED LEFT TURNS: WT Opposing volume(pre-PHF): _ • .:,-•-•,- ..,, • ,ri,,ir..-„, of-vr. C-A Opposing sat.flow rate: :4'1'11'7:1 air.,i4., 1 t ,,,Fr.-y.f. : •-,,--....,iA.,,. r::.,' ":', CALCULATIONS: I Opposing flow ratio(Yo): Unblocked G/C: • Effective red interval(sec): Average total queue(veh): Maximum total queue(veh): ' Total queue length(feet): Required storage/lane(feet): METHODOLOGY AND FORMULAS USED: • Length of red interval=(1•G/C)•Cycle length Outs.length=Maximum queue'Storage length per vehicle Average queue/lane=Volume'Red Interval/3600 Required storage per lane=Oueue length!Number of lanes,rounded up 10 190 next highest whole vehicle Maximum queue Random arrival/Constant service Rardom arrivals behave accordtng to a Poisson dIsInbution Opposing now ratio Yo=opposing volume vo/opposing sat now rale sop There e a probability equal lathe cool Hence level desired(e g 95%) that the queue formed during each red interval will be less than Unblocked G/C(gu/C)=(VC•Yo)/(1-Yo) or equal lo the maximum queue (Prob of arrivals=N)=(Red IntenalrN'exp(-N)/NI (the Poisson distribution) (Prob ol err/vale Ox N)x.I•Sum of probabilities lor vehicles O.1,...N•1 Max N Highest N such thal the sum of probabilities>11-confidence level) • • • SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS Project Name: U; // g g- KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. 5oOnese tu_fpf- :7*. •--- Project Number: -=. 610 SW Alder,Suite 700 Analyst: s%• Portland,Oregon 97205 Date: 1/12/2006 (503)228-5230 \ Filename: H:\projfile\7533-Opus NW Upper Boones Ferry Rezone exceNTPFN7533 Sig Itt4 .-"= -Fax: (503)273-8169 Intersection: D" ' 11rapeti-13:65-8e-"Aely-7g=LiA Conditions(yr,alt.,etc.): Cia-0:0b1110..-Tirdfts-IiiikdOM%3POS61126-littg GENERAL INPUT PARAMETERS: Cycle Length: sli201 sec Confidence Level(C.L.): ;47ta,.__'.9P• Storage length/vehicle: feet • APPROACH/MOVEMENT #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 t'''-^ $1 INPUT PARAMETERS: Volume(pre PHF)(vph): -fr47-"17. 281 : = '";-1-40 - " 'U.. G/C for movement: i;e0ia' • Number of lanes: .44,*'.‘344% " , •.••••••••=w4 - . •%•4, •r,'•7••Ailz• • ._ „ CALCULATIONS: Length of red interval(sec): 118.8 106.8 Average total queue(veh): 0.2 7.7 Maximum total queue(veh): 1 13 Total queue length(feet): 25 325 Required storage/lane(feet): 25 175 PERMITTED LEFT-TURNS: Opposing volume(pre-PHF): - rkr.....T."-74=XtrA War,. z Opposing sat.flow rate: CALCULATIONS: Opposing flow ratio(Yo): Unblocked G/C: Effective red interval(sec): Average total queue(veh): Maximum total queue(veh): Total queue length(feet): Required storage/lane(feet): METHODOLOGY AND FORMULAS USED: Length of red interval=(1 G/C)•Cycle length Oueue length=Maximum queue'Storage length per vehicle Average queue/lane=Volume•Red Interval/3600 Required storage per lane=Oueue length/Number of lanes.rounded up to the next highest whole vehicle Maximum queue Random arrival/Constant service Random arrivals behave according Ice Poisson distribution Opposing flow ratio Yo=opposing volume vo/opposing sat how rale sop There se probability equal 10 the confidence level desired le g 95%) that the queue Immix'during each red trderval will be less than Unblocked 0/C(gu/C)=10'C-Toy -To) or equal bc the maximum queue (Prob of arrivals•N)=(Red IntervalrN'exp(-1,1)/N! (the Poisson distribution) (Prob ol arrivals ov Ni 1•Sum of probabilities for vehicles 0,I. N-1 Max N Highest N such Oct the sum of probabilities>it-confidence level) ..,_, _ • i • g • • ••2*22 222222'R 522'.522222:2252R 22222'22*•IR2222.•222R55•2252; 22;2•••••• 1025 552•22 20255:5555 : •E9-4.6 • !IR . �s M E .... . igaz • ILI!piolop q( (y 77. ni ' ,s ,...*::,12 4 5 , ' iF? axs IP $-#.S . R-4.5 R gill* iiii•222222252:225.5 . if IllilR`�2 Fd I ' t-P 3i z k" I > < R•t2 '. Tt 7 • ..._..k. -"• :R•4.5 4-52 D( R }A M .. R-�.'_ 1 e f'.1•• 0 • inventory of industrial proper"�s Exhibit M, 1 PARCELS IN TIGARD ZONED INDUSTRIAL • (EXCLUDING PUBLICLY OWNED PARCELS) • Tax Lot ID # Site Address Acreage Zone Vacant? Subtotal • 2S101DC00900 13935 SW 72ND AVE 0.49 I-H NO • 2S101DD01000 13955 SW 72ND AVE 0.56 I-H NO 2S112AB00200 0 0.81 I-H NO • 2S112AB00100 0 0.92 I-H NO • 2S112AB00300 0 1.09 I-H NO 2S112AB00500 7300 SW LANDMARK LN 1.20 I-H NO • 2S112AB00600 14101 SW 72ND AVE 2.47 I-H ' NO • 2S112AB00700 0 2.52 I-H NO 2S112AA00400 14280 SW 72ND AVE 4.23 I-H NO • 2S112AA00300 14200 SW 72ND AVE 5.00 I-H NO • 2S112AB00400 7400 SW LANDMARK LN 5.00 I-H NO 2S112AA01000 0 5.05 I-H NO • 2S101 DC01100 7298 SW TECH CENT 5.28 I-H NO 2S112AA00900 14140 SW 72ND AVE 6.50 I-H NO • 2S112AB00800 0 8.90 I-H NO • Total I-H 50.02 2S112AB01700 0 0.02 I-L NO • 2S112BA05901 0 0.09 I-L NO • 2S112AB01600 7455 SW BONITA RD 0.10 I-L NO 2S112DD01701 0 0.11 I-L NO • 2S112BA06100 0 0.13 I-L NO • 2S112AC00100 14529 SW 72ND AVE 0.19 I-L NO 2S101DD00700 0 0.21 I-L NO ID 2S1010000701 0 0.22 I-L NO • 2S112BA05800 0 0.29 I-L YES 2S112DC01800 15785 SW 72ND 0.29 I-L NO • 2S113AB00100 0 0.29 I-L NO 2S112ACO2500 0 0.30 I-L NO • 2S112AB01100 2234 SW FERNWOOD C 0.32 I-L NO • 2S113AA01300 0 0.32 I-L NO 2S112DC01700 0 0.33 I-L NO • 2S112DC01200 0 0.34 I-L NO • 2S101BCO2900 8254 SW HUNZIKER ST 0.36 1-L NO 2S112AC00101 0 0.42 1-L NO • 2S112DD01900 0 0.42 I-L NO • 2S113AB00400 0 0.42 I-L NO 2S112DD01800 0 0.52 I-L NO • 2S112ACO2200 14835 SW 72ND AVE 0.53 I-L NO 2S112BA06000 0 0.53 I-L NO . • 2S112DD01700 0 0.53 I-L NO • 2S101BCO2500 0 0.57 I-L NO 2S112AB00900 0 0.58 I-L NO • 2S112AB01000 7225 SW BONITA RD 0.58 I-L NO • 2S113AB00500 0 0.59 I-L NO 2S112AD00401 0 0.61 I-L NO • 2S112BA05900 14050 SW MILTON CT 0.61 I-L NO • 2S101DD00900 14010 SW 72ND AVE 0.66 I-L NO 2S112DC01100 0 0.68 I-L NO • 2S112BA05801 0 0.71 I-L YES • 2S112AC01900 14945 SW 72ND AVE 0.76 I-L NO 2S112DD00300 15900 SW 72ND AVE 0.78 I-L NO • 2S101BD00302 0 0.79 I-L NO • • • edmurphyidcdesigngroup/zoningchart/9/26✓2005 1 I • • inventory of industrial proper'..,s Exhibit M1 • Tax Lot ID # Site Address Acreage Zone Vacant? Subtotal • 2S112DB00900 0 0.80 I-L NO • 2S112ACO2000 14915 SW 72ND AVE 0.81 I-L NO 2S112ACO2600 7320 SW BONITA RD 0.83 I-L NO • 2S112DD00400 15960 SW 72ND AVE 0.84 I-L NO • 2S112AC01000 0 0.86 I-L YES 2S101BCO2700 0 0.94 I-L NO • 2S112ACO2100 14865 SW 72ND AVE 0.96 I-L NO • 2S112AB02000 0 1.00 I-L YES 2S112DC01300 15930 SW 74TH AVE 1.00 I-L NO • 2S101BD00104 0 1.06 I-L YES 2S113AA00500 0 1.12 I-L NO • 2S113AA01100 0 1.14 I-L NO • 2S101DC04100 0 1.20 I-L NO 2S112ACO2700 7340 SW BONITA RD 1.25 I-L NO • 2S112AB01200 7235 SW BONITA RD 1.28 I-L NO • 2S101BCO2800 8250 SW HUNZIKER RD 1.36 I-L NO 2S113AA01000 0 1.47 I-L NO • 2S101 BD00101 12805 SW 77TH PL 1.49 I-L NO • 2S102DA00100 12970 SW HALL BLVD 1.49 I-L NO 2S113AA00200 16520 SW UPPER BOOS 1.49 I-L NO • 2S112AB01900 0 1.52 I-L NO 2S112AC01801 14965 SW 72ND AVE 1.56 I-L NO • 2S112AB01800 7415 SW BONITA RD 1.57 I-L NO • 2S112AC01100 14860 SW 74TH AVE 1.64 I-L NO 2S112AC00400 7380 SW BONITA RD 1.69 I-L NO • 2S113AA00700 0 1.69 I-L NO • 2S101AC01800 0 1.84 I-L NO 2S101BC00103 HUNZIKER ST 1.87 I-L YES • 2S101BD00301 8015 SW HUNZIKER RD 1.87 I-L YES • 2S112DD00500 0 1.90 I-L NO 2S112AC00200 17010 SW BONITA RD 1.95 I-L NO • 2S113AA00900 16500 SW 72ND AVE 1.97 I-L NO • 2S113AA00800 0 2.04 I-L NO 2S101DD00703 13950 SW 72ND AVE 2.13 I-L NO • 2S112ACO2300 0 2.15 I-L NO 2S112AC01800 0 2.16 I-L NO • 2S101BD00300 8015 SW HUNZIKER ST 2.28 I-L NO • 2S112AB01300 0 2.43 I-L NO 2S113AA00600 16120 SW 72ND AVE 2.51 I-L NO • 2S101BD00105 0 2.57 I-L NO • 2S112DB00100 0 2.72 I-L NO 2S112AC01500 14980 SW 74TH AVE 2.76 I-L NO • 2S113AA00100 0 2.84 I-L NO • 2S113AB00300 16075 SW UPPER BOOT` 2.93 I-L NO 2S112AB02300 0 3.00 I-L NO • 2S112AA00500 14344 SW 72ND AVE 3.40 I-L NO 2S101BCO2401 12560 SW HALL BLVD 3.51 I-L NO • 2S101BC00101 8185 SW HUNZIKER RD 3.82 I-L NO • 2S113AA00400 16200 SW 72ND AVE 3.83 I-L NO 2S113AA00300 0 3.88 I-L NO • 2S101BC00100 8185 SW HUNZIKER RD 3.98 I-L NO • 2S112DB00300 7257 SW KABLE LN 4.25 I-L NO • 2S101BD00103 7895 SW HUNZIKER RD 4.39 I-L NO • 2S112AD00501 0 4.96 I-L NO • I • edmurphyAdcdesigngroup/zoningchart/9/26/2005 2 • • • inventory of industrial proper"'s Exhibit M3 • Tax Lot ID # Site Address Acreage Zone Vacant? Subtotal • 2S112DB00401 0 4.98 I-L NO • 2S112AD00500 0 5.42 I-L NO 2S101DC04000 7500 SW TECH CENT 5.61 I-L NO • 2S113AD01900 0 5.75 I-L NO • 2S113AB00600 0 5.85 I-L NO 2S113AB01201 16505 SW 72ND AVE 6.13 I-L NO • 2S101BD00200 8001 SW HUNZIKER ST 6.26 I-L NO • 2S1010001201 7920 SW HUNZIKER DR 6.32 I-L NO 2S1010000500 12600 SW HALL BLVD 6.41 I-L NO • 2S113AD01800 16798 SW 72ND AVE 6.61 I-L NO • 2S101BCO2501 8100 SW HUNZIKER ST 7.57 I-L NO 2S101DD00800 14410 SW 72ND AVE 7.86 I-L NO • 2S102DA00600 13360 SW HALL BLVD 8.03 I-L YES 2S112AA00600 6713 SW BONITA RD 8.22 I-L NO • 2S1010000700 8200 SW HUNZIKER ST 8.41 I-L NO • 2S112DC00100 0 8.46 I-L NO 2S1010001202 7930 SW HUNZIKER ST 9.78 I-L NO • 2S1010001400 0 11.37 I-L YES • 2S112DC00200 7342 SW KABLE LN 11.44 I-L NO 2S1010000600 12700 SW HALL BLVD 12.54 I-L NO • 2S112DB00400 0 15.97 I-L NO • 2S1010001200 0 26.32 I-L YES Total I-L 322.51 • 1S135CB00100 0 0.00 I-P NO 1S135CB00800 0 0.00 I-P NO • 2S101DC04500 7555 SW TECH CENT 0.00 I-P NO • 2S112AD01100 0 0.00 I-P NO 2S113AB01600 0 0.01 I-P NO • 2S113AB01000 0 0.06 I-P NO • 2S102AB01802 9460 SW TIGARD ST 0.10 I-P NO 2S102BA01190 0 0.16 I-P NO • 2S101BCO2300 12530 SW HALL BLVD 0.21 I-P NO • 2S102BB00300 10080 SW KATHERINE E 0.23 I-P NO 2S112AD00400 0 0.28 I-P NO • 2S102BA01201 0 0.29 I-P NO 2S102BA00400 9780 SW TIGARD ST 0.30 I-P NO • 2S101BCO2100 8260 SW HUNZIKER RD 0.32 I-P NO • 2S112AD00200 0 0.32 I-P NO 2S112AC00500 0 0.33 I-P NO • 2S102BA00390 0 0.35 I-P NO • 2S102BA00900 12160 SW GRANT AVE 0.35 I-P NO 1S135CD01100 0 0.36 I-P NO • 2S101DD01100 0 0.37 I-P NO • 2S102BB00201 10060 SW KATHERINE E 0.42 I-P NO 2S102BA00500 9760 SW TIGARD ST 0.43 I-P NO • 2S102BA00901 9570 SW TIGARD ST 0.43 I-P NO • 2S112AD00301 0 0.49 I-P NO 1S135CB00500 11555 SW TIEDEMAN A\ 0.53 I-P NO • 2S112DB00200 0 0.56 I-P NO 2S113AB00200 16045 SW UPPER BOOS 036 I-P NO • 2S102AB01901 0 0.58 I-P NO • 2S102AB01800 9460 SW TIGARD ST 0.61 I-P NO 2S102BA01100 12220 SW GRANT AVE 0.64 I-P NO • 2S114AA00300 16295 SW 85TH AVEN 0.65 I-P NO • 2S102BA00600 9730 SW TIGARD ST 0.69 I-P NO S 0 • edmurphy/l dcdesigngroup✓zoningchart/9/26/2005 3 S • • inventory of industrial proper` °s .. Exhibit M4 • Tax Lot ID # Site Address Acreage Zone Vacant? Subtotal • 2S112DA00600 0 0.70 I-P NO • 1S135CB00300 11445 SW TIEDEMAN A\ 0.74 I-P NO 2S112DD00700 15750 SW UPPER BOON 0.74 I-P NO • 2S112DD01500 0 0.78 I-P NO • 2S112AC00700 14605 SW 74TH AVE 0.86 I-P NO 1S135CA00700 11225 SW GREENBURG 0.87 I-P NO • 2S112AD00300 6830 SW BONITA RD 0.90 I-P NO • 2S112DC01600 15575 SW 74TH AVE 0.90 I-P NO 2S101 BC00201 8255 SW HUNZIKER ST 0.92 I-P NO • 2S112AC00800 14645 SW 74TH AVE 0.96 I-P NO 2S101BCO2202 0 0.98 I-P NO • 2S113B000400 8100 SW DURHAM RD 0.98 I-P NO • 2S102BB00100 9930 SW TIGARD 0.99 I-P NO 2S101DD00702 0 1.00 I-P NO • 2S101BCO2201 8300 SW HUNZIKER RD 1.05 I-P NO • 2S112AC01600 14975 SW 74TH AVE 1.05 I-P NO 2S102BA00800 0 1.07 I-P NO • 2S101BCO2200 8430 SW HUNZIKER RD 1.08 I-P NO • 2S102AB01801 9440 SW TIGARD 1.10 I-P NO 1S135CB00600 11530 SW TIEDEMAN A\ 1.18 I-P NO • 2S101 DD00300 7100 SW SANDBURG Si 1.18 I-P NO 2S102AB01900 0 1.23 I-P NO • 2S112DA01100 0 1.26 I-P NO • 2S112AC00900 14775 SW 74TH AVE 1.27 I-P YES 2S102BA00301 9914 SW TIGARD ST 1.28 I-P NO • 2S113B000500 8168 SW DURHAM RD 1.29 I-P NO • 2S101 DD00401 6955 SW SANDBURG Sl 1.35 I-P NO 2S112DA01000 6610 SW CARDINAL LAN 1.36 I-P NO • 2S113AB00101 16101 SW 72ND AVE 1.38 I-P NO • 2S112DD01601 0 1.45 I-P NO 1S135C600100 0 1.46 I-P NO • 2S102BA00303 9800 SW TIGARD ST 1.64 I-P NO 2S101DD00200 SW SANDBURG ST 1.65 I-P NO • 2S112AC00600 7440 SW BONITA RD 1.67 I-P NO • 1S134DD00102 0 1.75 I-P NO 2S101DC03800 13730 SW 72ND AVE 1.76 I-P NO • 2S112AC01700 15065 SW 74TH AVE 1.76 I-P YES • 2S112DA01300 6640 SW REDWOOD LN 1.79 I-P NO 2S112AC01300 14905 SW 74TH AVE 1.83 I-P YES • 2S112DB00500 15115 SW 74TH AVE 1.84 I-P NO • 1S135CB00400 11535 SW TIEDEMAN A\ 1.87 I-P NO 2S112DC00701 15951 SW 72ND AVE 1.98 I-P NO • 2S112DC00500 15875 SW 72ND AVE 2.02 I-P NO • 2S112DA00300 15230 SW SEQUOIA PK' 2.12 I-P NO 2S102BA01000 9540 SW TIGARD ST 2.34 I-P NO • 2S102BA00302 9900 SW TIGARD ST 2.42 I-P NO 2S101DC04603 7405 SW TECH CENT 2.43 I-P NO • 2S102BA00501 9740 SW TIGARD ST 2.43 I-P NO • 2S102BA00304 9820 SW TIGARD ST 2.46 I-P NO 2S101DC04601 7477 SW TECH CENT 2.47 I-P NO • 2S102AB01902 9380 SW TIGARD ST 2.49 I-P NO • 2S112DD00200 15714 SW 72ND AVE 2.52 I-P NO 2S113BA00200 7800 SW DURHAM RD 2.58 I-P NO • 2S112DB00600 15205 SW 74TH AVE 2.78 I-P YES • 2S112DD01400 0 2.79 I-P NO • • • edmurphyAdcdesigngroup/zoningchart/9/26/2005 4 • • • inventory of industrial proper--,‘s Exhibit M5 • Tax Lot ID # Site Address Acreage Zone Vacant? Subtotal • 2S112DA01200 15060 SW SEQUOIA PAI 2.83 I-P NO • 2S101DC04602 7291 SW TECH CENT 2.87 I-P NO 2S112AD01100 0 3.00 I-P NO • 1S135CB00700 11440 SW TIEDEMAN A\ 3.27 I-P NO • 2S113AB00700 16255 SW UPPER BOON 3.36 I-P NO 2S101 DD00100 0 3.48 I-P NO • 2S113BA00100 7420 SW DURHAM RD 3.55 I-P YES • 2S114AA00200 16285 SW 85TH AVE 3.61 I-P NO 2S112AD01000 7007 SW CARDINAL LN 3.71 I-P NO • 1S135CC04000 9905 SW TIGARD ST 3.87 I-P NO • 2S112AD00700 0 3.88 I-P NO 2S112DC00201 15845 SW 74TH AVE 3.94 I-P NO • 2S113AC00102 0 4.00 I-P NO 2S112AC01200 14865 SW 74TH AVE 4.03 I-P YES • 2S112ACO2400 14655 SW 72ND AVE 4.19 I-P NO • 2S101BC00200 8205 SW HUNZIKER ST 4.20 I-L NO 2S112DD01600 15575 SW SEQUOIA PK' 4.27 I-P NO • 2S112DD00701 15800 SW UPPER BOON 4.48 I-P NO • 1S135CB00200 10250 SW NORTH DAKC 4.49 I-P NO 2S112DC01500 15615 SW 74TH AVE 4.61 I-P YES • 2S112DB00700 15245 SW 74TH AVE 4.65 I-P YES • 2S112DA00700 15115 SW SEQUOIA PK' 4.76 I-P NO 2S113AB01400 7300 SW DURHAM RD 5.39 I-P NO • 2S112DC01400 15865 SW 74TH AVE 5.41 I-P YES 2S113AC00101 0 5.54 I-P NO • 2S112DB00800 15515 SW 74TH 5.60 I-P YES • 2S112AD00600 14750 SW 72ND AVE 5.66 I-P NO 2S112DA01400 15350 SW SEQUOIA PIC 6.68 I-P NO • 2S113AB00800 15995 SW 74TH AVE 6.70 I-P YES • 2S112DA00800 15055 SW SEQUOIA PK' 7.76 I-P NO 2S113BA00400 7632 SW DURHAM RD 10.39 I-P NO 2S112AD00900 14800 SW SEQUOIA PK' 11.14 I-P NO i 2S113AC00103 0 11.78 I-P NO 2S1010001100 0 13.21 I-P YES • 2S112AD01200 6750 SW BONITA RD 15.99 I-P NO 2S1010000800 0 24.37 I-P YES • Total I-P 316.05 • Total Acreage 688.58 688.58 II • Before Zone Change Total Acreage I-H 50.02 7.3% • Total Acreage I-L 322.51 46.8% • Total Acreage I-P 316.05 45.9% Total Acreage 688.58 100.0% 0 After Zone Change • Total Acreage I-H 50.02 7.3% • Total Acreage I-L 316.51 46.0% Total Acreage I-P 322.05 46.8% • Total Acreage 688.58 100.0% 0 i • Original Data Source:City of Tigard GIS,August 26,2002. Analysis by Ed Murphy • • • edmurphy/dcdesigngroup/zoningchart 9/26/2005 5 •