Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
ZON2002-00003
• Ala hoipikel April 29, 2003 CITY OF TIGAR® OREGON Ed Murphy Ed Murphy & Associates 9875 SW Murdock Street Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Murphy: This is in response to your letter to Bill Monahan regarding the Sykart Indoor Racing Center noise issue. Bill and I have discussed the issue and your noise study. Please be advised that the City Manager has no authority to waive the provisions of the noise ordinance as you suggest. The City cannot, in good conscience, ignore the ordinance standards especially for noise sensitive units. Your report indicates four-inch thick concrete masonry units will provide for compliance that provides more protection than necessary. You have indicated that you prefer to utilize 18-inch fiberglass insulation over the door at the northwest corner of the building and six-inch over the door located near the middle of the building's west side. Your report indicates that night time noise would approximate night time ambient levels. The report offers no other alternative. Recognize that whether or not noise standards are met, your client's property is still subject to the noise complaint provisions of the code for noise that is unnecessarily loud regardless of decibel levels. In such a case, two witnesses of noise issues are required to establish a violation. Previous uses of the property are irrelevant. A change of use must be subject to ordinance standards. You and your client have been aware of the necessity of meeting the noise requirements since the beginning of your quest to operate in this particular location. The City cannot guess whether or not there will be noise complaints based on the information provided in the study you have presented. Ultimately, that can only be answered by the adjacent residents. Your client will assume the risk of violating the ordinance and subsequent fines regardless of the mitigation route taken. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 Page 1 of 2 • Ant I would suggest that your client develop an additional alternative that will provide compliance. If, as the report says, the ambient noise levels may mask the noise, then maybe the operation will not be subject to complaints. Mr. Monahan and I discussed the suggestion that a review be made of the noise ordinance standards. Please be advised, that these standards have been in effect for years and were reaffirmed by Council with the adoption of the 2001 amendments. The standards are specifically to protect noise sensitive units. To change the standards means the higher probability of intrusive noise, more complaints, and lesser protection of noise sensitive units. We do not believe this is prudent or advisable given the City Council's desire to protect neighborhoods. Sincerely, oStc , Richard H. Bewersdorff Planning Manager I:\curpin\dick\letters\sykart indoor racing noise study.doc c: SDR2002-00018 ZON2002-00003 Bill Monahan Page 2 of 2 • • w'n. 120 DAYS = 1/18/2003 CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO. 2002-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Case Numbers: ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2002-00003 Case Name: SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE Name of Owner: Knez Realty Group Name of Applicant: Yun S. Hong Address of Applicant: 17450 West Valley Hwy. Tukwila, WA 98188-5511 Address of Property: 8205 SW Hunziker Street Tigard, OR 97223 Tax Map/Lot Nos.: Washington County Tax Assessor's Map No. 2S101 BC, Tax Lot 200. A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A ZONE CHANGE. THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICANT'S PLANS, NARRATIVE, MATERIALS, COMMENTS OF REVIEWING AGENCIES, THE PLANNING DIVISION'S STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 18. 2002 (continued from 10/21 to 11/4 to 11/18) TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY REGARDING THIS APPLICATION. THIS DECISION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. Request: > The applicant is requesting approval to change the existing zone from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) in order to convert an old industrial building into a "SyKart Indoor Racing Center." Current Zoning Designation: I-L: Light Industrial District. Proposed Zoning Designation: I-P: Industrial Park District. Applicable Review Criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.530. Action: > © Approval as Requested ❑ Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to: © Owners of Record Within the Required Distance E3 Affected Government Agencies © The Affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator © The Applicants and Owners The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obtained from the Planning Division/Community Development Department at the City of Tigard City Hall. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON NOVEMBER 25, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON DECEMBER 12, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON DECEMBER 11, 2002. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. • • �' K NOTICE OF FINALwORDER NO.-2002-a3 PC-;„-,-: 1;;:: BY'TH:E PLANNING NNI_ NG COMMISSION � _CITY OF TIOARD�, r ., fi x Community(Development FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD OREGON 5rCmum A FINAL ORDER APPROVING A LAND USE APPLICATION FOR A ZONE CHANGE. THE COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON THIS APPLICATION ON NOVEMBER 18, 2002. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS BASED THEIR DECISION ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. 120 DAYS = 1/18/2003 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE CASE NO.: Zone Change (ZON) ZON2002-00003 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval to change the existing zone from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (1-P) in order to convert an old industrial building into a "SyKart Indoor Racing Center." APPLICANT: Yun S. Hong OWNER: Knez Realty Group 17450 West Valley Hwy. 8185 SW Hunziker Street Tukwila, WA 98188-5511 Tigard, OR 97223-8229 LOCATION: 8205 SW Hunziker Street; WCTM 2S101 BC, Tax Lot 200. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. Among other uses, indoor entertainment is allowed. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.530; and Comprehensive Plan Policies 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 12. NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO.2002-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 1 OF 10 • • SECTION II. PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION ;The .Planning Commission findsz that the proposed Zone Change meets "'the applicable approval criteria` of the Tigard'Community`Development Code and that the proposal will not,' adversely affect the heallth, safety..,and welfare of fIKO. ;City The Planning Commission,. t therefore,;APPROVES the requested Land Use Application vs SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History The property has been zoned for industrial uses for many years. The building located on the site was originally built in 1960 by Irvington-Moore, which used it to manufacture machinery for plywood mills until 1996, when Knez Realty Group LLC acquired it. It has been used since that time by Power Rents (for storing and repairing equipment) and Safeway Scaffolding, and is now used by Knez Building Materials to store sheet rock. The property was zoned M-3, Light Industrial, in August 1977. In 1982 the M-3 zone was revised, and renamed I-L. Certain uses, such as offices, were no longer allowed in the I-L zone. In 1988, the adjacent property, (2S101 BC-00201), was rezoned from I-L to I-P at the request of the property owner. The building on that parcel, built in 1973 under the classification of a "public utility", became a permitted office use under the I-P zone. In 1997, the 2-story office portion of the building located on the subject property was completely remodeled and upgraded by Power Rents. The upgrade included handicapped accessible restrooms on the ground floor under (BUP97-0319.) At that time, Mr. Knez constructed a handicapped accessible walkway from SW Hunziker. Vicinity Information The subject property is bordered on the southwest by the 2-story office building mentioned above, zoned I-P and to the east and southwest by industrial buildings, zoned I-L. The area to the north of the property is zoned General Commercial (C-G) and is developed as a business park. There is a mix of industrial and office uses along SW Hunziker Street, zoned I-P and I-L. There are single-family detached homes on the west side of the property, zoned R-4.5, served by Knoll Drive. The closest home is approximately 250 feet from the building located on the subject property. Site Information And Proposal Description The applicant is requesting approval to change the existing zone from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) in order to convert an old industrial building into a "SyKart Indoor Racing Center." The proposed use will fit under the indoor entertainment use category which is allowed in the I-P zone and not within the I-L zone. With the abutting property to the south zoned I-P and properties across SW Hunziker zoned I-P, a campus-like setting is established due to the extent that each of the surrounding properties have developed. The I-P zone still allows for light-industrial uses, however, it also allows for a wider range of uses, making the property more marketable. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.380 Chapter 18.380 states that a recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application for a quasi judicial amendment shall be based on all of the following standards: NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO.2002-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 OF 10 • • Demonstration of compliance with all applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designations. The applicable Comprehensive Plan Polices are as follows. In virtually all cases, the Comprehensive Plan treats the I-L and I-P zones interchangeably. 2. CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT: 2.1.1 The City shall maintain an ongoing citizen involvement program and shall assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to be involved in all phases . of the planning process. On behalf of Mr. Hong, the applicant, Mr. Ed Murphy sent out notices to surrounding property owners and neighborhood representatives, posted a sign on the property, and held a neighborhood meeting on August 15, 2002 in accordance with the City of Tigard's neighborhood meeting notification process. According to the minutes of the neighborhood meeting, nine property owners were in attendance. No objections were given to the proposed zone change. The applicant discussed the proposed indoor racing use and the impacts that it would have on the area. Mr. Hong presented one of the go-karts that would be used with the business and started it up in order for the attendants to hear the level of noise that would be produced. Other items discussed were exterior lighting, hours of operation, loitering and storage of fuel for the go-karts. 3. NATURAL FEATURES AND OPEN SPACE: 3.1.1 The City shall not allow development in areas having the following development limitations except where it can be shown that established and proven engineering techniques related to a specific site plan will make the area suitable for the proposed development. (note: this policy does not apply to lands designated as significant wetlands on the floodplain and wetlands map.): a. Areas meeting the definition of wetlands under Chapter 1.26 of the community development code. b. Areas having a severe soil erosion potential; c. Areas subject to slumping, earth slides or'movement; d. Areas having slopes in excess of 25%; or e. Areas having severe weak foundation soils. A very small area of the property along the northern property' line contain wetlands. However, the building and parking area are pre-existing uses, and no expansion of either is planned. There will be no impact to the wetlands as a result of this zone change. The property does not have any of the other development limitations listed above. Therefore, this policy has been satisfied. 5. ECONOMY: 5.1 The City shall promote activities aimed at the diversification of the economic opportunities available to Tigard residents with particular emphasis placed on the growth of the local job market. 5.4 The City shall ensure that new commercial and industrial development shall not encroach into residential areas that have not been designated for commercial or industrial uses. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES: 14. The City shall encourage the location and development of economic activities which meet the occupational and employment needs of all City residents, particularly the unemployed and underemployed. According to the applicant's narrative, The proposed use itself will employ about five people. NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO.2002-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 3 OF 10 • • This is not a large amount of employment, but it is more than are employed for the current use, which is warehousing sheet rock. In addition, there are positive economic benefits from the proposed indoor racing facility, particularly to lodging and restaurant businesses in the area. The facility is located close to downtown Tigard. The proposed use is not new development, the use will occur entirely within an existing building. However, the proposed I-P zone will offer better protection to the neighborhood from potential future uses than the I-L zone currently does. Therefore, Policies 5.1 and 5.4 have been satisfied. 7. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES: 7.1.2 The City shall require as a pre-condition to development approval that; a. Development coincide with the availability of adequate service capacity including: 1. Public water; 2. Public sewer shall be required for new development within the city unless the property involved in over 300 feet from a sewer line and Washington County Health Department approval for a private disposal system is obtained; and 3. Storm drainage. b. The facilities are: 1. Capable of adequately serving all intervening properties and the proposed development; and 2. Designed to city standards. c. All new development utilities to be placed underground. The existing building is already connected to public water, public sewer and public storm drainage, all of which have adequate service capacity. Therefore, Policy 7.1.2 has been met. 8. TRANSPORTATION: 8.1.1 Plan, design and construct transportation facilities in a manner which enhances the livability of Tigard by: a. Proper location and design of transportation facilities. b. Encouraging pedestrian accessibility by providing safe, secure and desirable pedestrian routes. c. Addressing issues of excessive speeding and through traffic on local • residential streets through a neighborhood traffic program. The program should address corrective measures for existing problems and asure that development incorporates traffic calming. 8.1.2 Provide a balanced transportation system, incorporating all modes of transportation (including motor vehicle, bicycle, pedestrian, transit and other modes) by: a. The development of and implementation of public street standards that recognize the multi-purpose nature of the street right-of-way for utility, pedestrian, bicycle, transit, truck and auto use. b. Coordination with Tri-met, and/or any other transit providers serving Tigard, to improve transit service to Tigard. Fixed route transit will primarily use arterial and collector streets in Tigard. Development adjacent to transit routes will provide direct pedestrian accessibility. c. Construction of bicycle lanes on all arterials and collectors within Tigard consistent with the bicycle master. All schools, parks, public facilities and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a bikeway. NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO.2002-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 4 OF 10 • • d. Construction of sidewalks on all streets within Tigard. All schools, parks, public facilities and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a sidewalk. e. Development of bicycle and pedestrian plans which link to recreational trails. f. Design local streets to encourage a reduction in trip length by providing connectivity and limiting out-of-direction travel and provide connectivity to activity centers and destinations with a priority for bicycle and pedestrian connections. g. Tigard will participate in vehicle trip reduction strategies developed regionally targeted to achieve non-single occupant vehicle levels outlined in Table 1.3 of the Regional Transportation Plan. h. Tigard will support the development of a commuter rail system as part of the regional transit network. 8.1.4 Set and maintain transportation performance measures that: a. Set a minimum intersection level of service standard for the City of Tigard and requires all public facilities to be designed to meet this standard. b. Set parking ratios to provide adequate parking, while providing an incentive to limit the use of the single occupant vehicle. c. Encourage working with other transportation providers in Washington County, including Tri-Met, Metro and ODOT to develop, operate and maintain intelligent transportation systems, including coordination of traffic. The subject. property has an existing driveway onto SW Hunziker. The City may require additional dedication of land to meet current street right-of-way requirements for a "regional access bikeway", in order to accommodate bicycle traffic. However, the dedication of right- of-way will be addressed under Site Development Review. The proposed use may generate transit ridership. The Tri-Met bus stop or the #38 and #78 bus lines are located on Hunziker Street, directly in front of the site. The applicant will work with Tri-Met to make any reasonable pedestrian or transit-oriented improvements that will encourage transit ridership. The project will meet the requirements of Section 18.810 of the Tigard Development Code regarding transit facilities. The Site Plan will also be reviewed by Tn-Met as part of the Site Development review application. All on-site parking and circulation will be done to City specifications, although a variance or adjustment will be sought, if necessary, to reduce the amount of parking from the 4.3 spaces/1000 square feet of building space required by the Tigard Development Code for indoor recreation. 9. ENERGY: 9.1.3 The City shall encourage land use development which emphasizes sound energy conservation, design and construction. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 8. The City shall coordinate with and support public and private planning efforts that advocate alternative forms of transportation such as mass transit, carpooling, ride share, bicycling and walking for commuter purposes. Customers may walk to the indoor racing facility, bicycle, car-pool, take a bus, come with a group in a van or bus, or drive their own vehicle. There are several available modes of transportation by which customers can get to and from the facility. Therefore, the application complies with Policy 9.1.3. NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO.2002-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 5 OF 10 • • 12. LOCATIONAL CRITERIA: 12.3 INDUSTRIAL. The intent of the industrial land use designation is to: 1. Provide for the designation of suitable lands for industrial use; 2. Provide for economic growth and development; 3. Protect existing and potential lands suitable for industrial development from encroachment by.non-industrial or incompatible uses; 4. Provide land for industrial use by type to minimize the impact on surrounding development; and 5. Take advantage of existing transportation facilities. Industrial lands are classified as: Heavy industrial lands are areas intended to provide for manufacturing, processing and assembling activities. Uses within this classification are characterized by large buildings and large storage areas and as having associated external effects such as smoke, noise, odor or visual pollution. Light industrial lands are areas intended to provide for manufacturing, processing, assembling and related office activities. Uses within this classification are of a size and scale which makes them generally compatible with other non-industrial uses and which have no off-site effects. The subject site is adjacent to a residential zone and a two-story office building located in an I-P zone. The use that has been proposed to occupy the subject site if the zone change is approved will go through the City's Site Development Review process, where off-site effects will be addressed and conditions will be imposed to ensure that there are no off-site effects. The land use map designates specific areas of the city for industrial development. Over time, however, there may be a demand for new sites. Therefore, the following policy will apply in making such decisions. 12.3.1 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE THAT: a. Sites for heavy industrial development shall be: (1) Separated by topography established buffers, transportation or other non-residential land uses from residentially developed areas. (2) Located in areas having rail service, arterial or major collector access. b. Sites for light industrial development shall be: (1) Buffered from residential areas to ensure that privacy and the residential character of the area are preserved. (2) Located on an arterial or collector street and that industrial traffic shall not be channeled through residential areas. c. The site shall be of a size and shape which will provide for the short and log range needs of the use. d. The land intended for development shall have an average site topography of less than 6% grade, or that it can be demonstrated that through engineering techniques all limitations to development and the provision of services can be mitigated. e. It can be demonstrated that associated lights, noise and other external effects will not interfere with the activities and uses on surrounding properties. f. All other applicable plan policies can be met. NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO.2002-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 6 OF 10 • • IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. Industrial development adjacent to existing or planned residential areas shall be conditioned to ensure that: a. The specific proposed use will be compatible with adjacent uses; b. The design of the facility and its site will not place visual or physical burdens on the surrounding areas; c. The operational characteristics of the facility will be compatible with surrounding uses and include[s] consideration of 1 Delivery and shipping characteristics; 2 Hours of operation; 3 Noise; 4 Lighting; and 5 Other use characteristics. The subject property, because it is adjacent to an R-4.5 zone, and abuts another I-P zoned property, would be more appropriately zoned I-P than 1-L. The proposed site improvements will ensure that the adjacent residential area is not adversely impacted with light, noise or other external effects. The applicant proposes and will be conditioned under Site Development Review to shroud all external lights to eliminate glare from adjacent properties. The applicant will also be required to show that the proposed use for the subject property (indoor go-kart racing) will not exceed applicable noise levels. According to the applicant, all activities will take place indoors, the go-karts are equipped with catalytic converters and mufflers, and are not full size racecars. The doors on the west side that abut the R-4.5 zone will not be left open during operation of the go-karts. The fans for the building will all be on the east side of the existing building. • The I-P zoning district requires that 25 percent of all sites to be developed be landscaped and all industrial uses that abut residential zones have a minimum buffer equal to 25 feet, which includes a minimum of trees, berms and shrubs. Currently there is approximately 32 1/2 feet between the existing building on the subject site and the abutting residential zone to the west. Therefore, the applicant will be required at Site Development Review to comply as closely to the required standards as possible. Possible conditions may include closing off west side of the subject building to all traffic. Creation of outdoor open space on the west side of the building to meet buffering standards and the campus like setting which is the intent of the I-P zoning district may also be feasible. The applicant has mentioned in pre-application meetings that a variance to parking will most likely be applied for to reduce the number of required parking. Therefore, more square footage would be available for landscaping and creative ideas to lessen the impact of the proposed and future uses for the property. 18.380.030.8.2 Demonstration of compliance with all applicable standards of any provision of this code or other applicable implementing ordinance; and The proposed SyKart Indoor Racing Center would be within an old industrial building, which was built many years prior to the adoption of the current development standards. No expansion of the building or the site will be proposed, nor any additional paving. The building meets the maximum height restrictions, and the maximum site coverage. The parking lot is landscaped with existing trees, and the building has direct pedestrian access from Hunziker Street to the front door of the building. Hunziker Street is fully improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk. The applicant has submitted a traffic study with the narrative. NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO.2002-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 7 OF 10 • • While it may not be feasible to meet all of the current standards of the Development Code, due to the non-conformity of the existing structure, it will be possible to bring the site closer to conformance with those standards. Further, if the site redevelops entirely, or new development is added on the north end of the parcel, through Site Development Review, that new development will be better able to meet all of the current standards of the I-P zone. 18.380.030.8.3 Evidence of change in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to the property which is the subject of the development application. Typically, a lighter industrial zone borders a residential zone. From reviewing the City of Tigard's zoning map, it is clear that this is the case. For instance, the residential neighborhood at the south end of SW Hunziker Street, served by SW Fir and Varns Streets, is zoned R-4.5 and is surrounded by I-P and C-P (Commercial Professional) zones. Similarly, 'the I-P zone has been applied along SW Tigard Street, which also abuts a residential neighborhood zoned R-4.5. The same situation exists along SW Durham Road, where the residentially zoned properties on the north side of SW Durham Road where the residentially zoned properties on the north side of SW Durham Road abut I-P zoning on the south side of SW Durham Road. In fact, the only other place where I-L zoning abuts a residential zone is just south of the railroad tracks, east of the Senior Center. In this area, the residential neighborhoods are separated from the industrial uses by a wide wetland and floodplain buffer. The only place in the City where R-4.5 zoning abuts I-L zoning where the actual uses are not physically separated by wetlands and/or floodplains, is the subject site. The subject property was most likely originally zoned industrial because an industrial building was already there. The M-3 zone, applied in 1977, was also most likely applied based on the existing use, warehouse, as was the case in 1982, when the I-L zone was established. Had the property been vacant, or had it been used for an office building, like the property adjacent to the south, it most likely would have been zoned I-P. This is evident from reading the staff report and Planning Commission minutes from the zone change of 1988 which was a request to change the property to the south (2S101 BC-00201) of the subject site (2S101 BC-00200) from an I-L zoning designation to an 1-P designation. That is, a lighter I-P zone should have been originally applied next to the R-4.5 zone, and most likely would have been, had it not been for the existing use (warehouse). If the subject property was already zoned I-P, and an application asked for a zone change to I-L an argument against the hypothetical zone change would likely be that it is adjacent to R-4.5 and single-family neighborhood, and, therefore, would not be the appropriate zone. I-P is a "lighter" zone. The types of uses allowed and prohibited are more compatible with a residential area than the types of uses allowed in the I-L zoning district. Considering the purpose statement of the industrial zoning district, it states "The location of land within each industrial district must be carefully selected, and design and development standards created to minimize the potential adverse impacts of industrial activity on established residential areas." The zoning map is therefore inconsistent in the zoning of this property. Based on the zoning patterns in other areas of the City, the location of land was not carefully selected in this case, as the property should have been zoned I-P to limit the industrial activity on established residential areas. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the standards outlined in Section 18.380 have been addressed and satisfied. NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO.2002-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 8 OF 10 • • SECTION V. ADDITIONAL STAFF AND OUTSIDE AGENCY COMMENTS City of Tigard Operations Manager/Water Department have reviewed this proposal and offered no comments or objections City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and offered no comments or objections. City of Tigard Long Range Planning Department has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: • General objection to changing the zone to one that allows more non-industrial uses. Any industrial land in Tigard is in short supply, especially for truly industrial uses that requires the I-L zone and are not permitted in 1-P zones. City of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: • My comments will be limited to the impacts on the transportation system. There will be no adverse impacts on any other public facility. CTS Engineers, Inc. submitted a report dated September 9, 2002. The overall purpose of the report was to identify the intersections in the vicinity of this site that may be impacted by this zone change, compare the existing Levels of Service (LOS) during the PM Peak Hour with a variety of scenarios: 1) Maximum build-out under the current I-L zone, 2) maximum build-out under the proposed I-P zone, and 3) build-out per the proposed Sykart Indoor Racing Center (SIRC). The CTS report identified the following intersections as the most critical for analysis: • Hall Boulevard/Scofjins Street/Hunziker Street (signalized) • Hunziker Street/72n Avenue (signalized) • Hunziker Street/Site Driveway (unsignalized). Staff concurred with the selection of critical intersections. CTS determined that the current LOS for the three intersections during the weekday PM Peak Period are as follows: • Hall Boulevard/Scofjins Street/Hunziker Street: LOS C • Hunziker Street/72" Avenue: LOS C • Hunziker Street/Site Driveway: LOS B CTS then performed a comparison of the three scenarios mentioned above. For the worst case full build-out in the I-L zone, they used the Light Industrial category (ITE 110). For the worst case full build-out in the I-P zone, they used the General Office category (ITE 710). For the Sykart scenario, they used actual driveway count data obtained from other Sykart facilities in the state of Washington. The following is a comparison of the PM Peak Hour trip generation that could be experienced from the subject site, assuming a 70,000 sf facility (current building size): -L Zone, Light Industrial: 69 PM Peak trips • I-P Zone, General Office: 104 PM Peak trips • Sykart Project: 20 PM Peak trips. It can easily be seen that the Sykart project will not generate a significant amount of trips during the PM Peak period. However, it is still important to compare the worst case scenarios of the two zones. NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO.2002-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 9 OF 10 • • CTS then compared the expected LOS (Weekday PM Peak) for the critical intersections, based on the worst case trip generations mentioned above. The following is a summary of their findings: Intersection LOS (I-L) LOS (I-P) LOS (Sykart) Hall/Scoffins/Hunziker Hunziker/72nd D D C Hunziker/Site Driveway C C B Based on that comparison, there would be no additional impact to the estimated LOS of the critical intersections by rezoning this site to I-P. To further bolster that opinion, it is interesting to compare the volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratios of the two signalized intersections under the same scenarios. When V/C approaches 1.0, a given intersection is near failing. Below is a comparison of the V/C ratios: Intersection V/C (l-L) V/C (I-P) V/C (Sykart) Hall/Scoffins/Hunziker 0.79 0.80 0.79 Hunziker/72nd 0.86 0.87 0.85 Again, there is no significant change to the critical intersections as a result of the rezoning. Based on the information above, I would support the proposed zone change. SECTION VI. CONCLUSION It is further ordered that the applicant and the parties to these proceedings be notified of the entry of this order. PASSED: This 18th day of November, 2002 by the City of Tigard Planning Commission. ,14,4_,A %) 441. (42/LI Judith Anderson, Planning Commission Chair is\curpin\mathew\zon\zon2002-00003 Staff Report.FINALORDER NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO.2002-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 10 OF 10 a �___ o CITY of TIGARD I it OEOORAPHIC INFORMATION sysTEM LOMI • r., ■ VICINITY MAP \ , ' 499\14 � *111111 a� 1ON2002-00003 4ipt ft SYKART INDOOR RACING �� ZONE CHANGE -frip-i 4 iii cps ♦ r Ailh.,_ „1,kv 1170—■ r 14\S RD ■ 4 i 1%.* 6%44 # i„!;,•""' -" ,Ok '' n CC • / ■A. IGT Q- TA D • a r. •/� A ` ,, ` ` B @�F BAN.�-RD. R,"'�,;0;10, , ...„,„,,,o.,,,,,, 14 Tigard Area Map #*;1* • Itlit 04 si, 'S 0 400 4 ■ 1'=500 feet .."'■ 41, ?Cityof Tigard 800 Feet r Information on this map Is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd \■ I Tigard.83 97223 (503)839.4171 http://www.atigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Sep 20,2002;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR • • -, /11r■1�)� ♦.i.,.i ,,,,,,,,,,-,..01.E.•r/1•• eI3t••i V. �� _•'is 11 ■1\ \Q \I �� •Ls..ar 1��e.•� -T O�ir.• r , ~ � I 'irt nei♦.or %Norm r �!,-- �1�1 ����� # !• 11♦h.... . �:1111_.1111\I • V •.Y.� ..;... � ��r��, 11..,.. -, ,:Ip••.\\:1111._.■ ai r.=°�,� • : I 1 1 Z r•..v�7ri::e4. - '7 . �� , ..„, r ai::: •� 0.A•11:11 1111■■_11_11. ••,____ ,��II a .•�11ir t1. •♦•. IIr E 1 / ,II■" 1,.........i•.� `,... ••■ ,_u� o;r,` �•� �. • ro f _ _•11•1111111 .rrr �. 511 :',:;iui►-- - r ..�. i ' �■ urr_Mow= `•�� 9ttt" /�.. 1111 ■►�'. - .• 9110 < , � 11' ta+� _ 0 ■n■1111 - .�' W i- r ■ r t I�a1�. G ,,1111..>.�.� - 1111:- r.w. 1111. .■Lr=i1 ✓•,•�� ,+r I c uk �� �. t,: •�� p ii rrs'maw�oi.tnieaa wwxxmm.ee�me rtes ``� a, r. .SL. ' yn}�1 ':sr'�is, �;ki .� .' �_• t■ isr■ (!,.wiR r Isrm�It-fA, .� Y w; ` • `. -Y�®..�� `a',{ ' "i O ®ar,EFE11g-'rr11111 ,, �'`: ��.,-..po ;t ''wr��.. � ' M r ■,.' f - � * PJ s r::k ' yr N T T { ; •ItSifit E F EENE �Is@.Iflg iii,.l- _N w_"ail I - -,u :.. 111 , ,'4 d" r�1�r11 - 111 s®� I'm a ass r . � �sa•�:. �. tLxi£'.k:� 'i•r, xl I .' 4 z ' plr® g 1.7..,a;z4 �.� ®® 9�y'M sy K '.4;, tc,: •t,7. �, •L `w�.o n yaro'm A as11�11��IA}am_ y" �� 111®e�■ w�/,: Et/41 _1-00 i °z::'`": y': ■179■q® j�� td I a:°.i'r? 1@�IYi,9 Inapt nim® 'r! _J_ 4'� ��■ C/ w,td ,• p \�� i7 pr• 0 tt0■Ilflf ear' ,,ti w °. -•.. ^1«;1-ISM 5,.. '� ■'V� 1 n lit 0 1�':r lu11■r11 .a'�.':�4C{�cE �'�..Fhi,. N' "s't, ! �i ¢1q f 7e:�`.�■ .v t �.:�_ .U�:UIIEL •� N 8 CI ;,<<,, '21 E•14 '6' i 1-1-4 1- 1:18®G�:Y: ®Q i-_ 1 rl` 7,. •∎- 8•iiii io/ _ ®/� (' u: �^ x, ri ITS .•�: i _�� ��_�__8@�I,:> " tli ��I I�►1►�ti C t.1N1ltr•® +�,,: ,'tm 01.:Mr,, d.` „; p }' Li@�TfTi�TI(i7;�;: It�@I�■� � _ A� _ _=_EfB ?����O�►/�uti W ,�4r f,•'.a''', `y+, v` `�,,`i d,5.'I q \Uaoo- 7_i Dr _1-5 ® 'r,t4,7\ /• r tMM , w„ts�u, 'r` i r.,». Ii.r� Rs. -._C'G:.A_�Ir�:nr cl 1�iQ::�`/• �6. ®. Z RIM/ ,k;//+.°,,�v"a••`•, �.t i,, a `.S '• !:3,p'' s o.r =r': :a i R t. 'jti¢r.A,:c .rd>,.x,;"�.¢+3�' c�;.•n Yllllf ,V a T,iUC ,y ,g �,,, ♦ \ ♦ ro EIMM® 6`n,. ilsa•'9 .; ,•:,.: ,4r' 't1�, t ,,il,flint �_.".rr, l:r:� � I�` -on. A1U8? _ � .� 1,N r..1♦ i.a ■■� �. a5:•:;tai, 1 'iic Y:# , m= tt a-,ei _ •....w % ud. Iw . �,` "•,►\� `!rf�v t, i;a'`%�"" urC s' a-_1•• °� UIII � •�,� ,,, l' 7 ';4t'l..4.1.,1•t...�1;ct. 4 ." 2r":-1:' r 1'7 °f• ill_ a 1KT:- ":. -�7m �'�WUI. u111r.. � ,i' v* ,,:•'-• ,: „y t: 't •. I 1� j_ (. 1-..�\u;.l_ Q ,r .)!v. Rr,'r:, , 5. - _ .A 1111. �tl-:__ nwm;::..flfli: ��■I��'�• 0, r uur,nut 'i�� �rpv �®r,gya.yY.� }i sra.t.. ) v,� ,Im�aatrau n� �• �� ai ':r � � D�;' 1,,;. I - -51�+G •--71 ur;�, �•_•�'L:M: _ar�uui`R�; � I, i� V �/ `ni it," �� �� ®i.', ' ^ . �J`InS�,:)• palm I � 1111 is �i:_G!■�!�_r o .•.Ip.:r- �1��' \?riL �Ak O ri. :n �'l.% ' ' 770 Irii4;�/ .<,iyri v:.t . „tt•i: .i'. `5'�IM;it iiiulie1= ;,ii;T r: ..p 2 ie _JY§.0 :41 /� :ff.''- 1111 Ri\�"1Aa �--+- ■.®®fwi■.■■■ .W,->g,�;j:-, 0);,,,,,!I(f 3,i* -,, r..;:iu I_ 9117i��i.A,L17t'aaa� .;i.:,.-+�.: ,-.1: O 1 �� ®a0(.® sSi�l 4',1;',, M�', r„ :Xn;?i1F''st `".':etl�o°• :;fI111I '°' liiii'i11►\ :r Icp.r �® ��' •ee�l\ 1 i� 6' ;.PJ, r Y m■11ani■s tI Wa •>2il:j, ■ q l __ 0 1�rIA®1!� �� . �' '`rx^i►s- 11 .1111x^r.:''.....-- - _ O• �� q ♦ i/s^-, • El:...1: "-`rim...i .,il ® 71p �.;�r rs I-' r- :.ii. 1111 ;d +C.: "�.� ®9 I 4.011/ ®� ®� nf.:". 0. ':,;t,•"1sr 'rrsagz,..': il� m-�'�N.:..�.,e,,, �I r;<c., .ai Zai1:a: i.� 1=w• /� 1---�L / •� ® .`/BB1111 '''-`.�q",., \t i�pa ypA-�� le wrlJ`�"l: ►�..1:/iii\i°I'!°.':` �...�-..r Am ;-„' 4%f;, y H. ■1rta.��L�i ",;� 4'9 ,� ;:r�'�` !�8I .,rrlstr �■,;111i.t'�:%%i 'sita w:4141t,;�rr":•�`'��'' �: 1j�/ 'o? ', g i a i fi■/) 4 " • �e�y ;:i i;:t;.;;5.$. 1\:/ Al Q]elli■IIMIRM II lii�4 ♦ ..25#4.:0 '6 Yr.'�: C"9.emtl iI111199IIQQ �}�p m-- • ..�..I:d A /�O.nv •.r..9.., `.1- I' •�.- 414 APO ,'3,;: Omlb'°'■®x11 R!•"7`t �■ ''$'w!■- 1r47: 41.1', �' - r'I\ :to ;-x':,;:,<y.--; ..i��r,�■.i� �� b 0 .m. ,UM r rmmm..1 �p a ,. .- at2. V..♦•nd. ■ ;p ! C1 1 9lsoem �. .[a� � -- o ��- `�.,.. 1111. -» ;::_ � _ �� : - Ur ._ i� `*»I,. un. is° •urea..■1 �. - - .• r - A 1111 tl: • d .11__.. Ip �� �♦®� �wu��� .■m.tair' �d.ID. i..:�; a: �r • 1111. - � y 11O• i■ n■ol yf ''� / ...�,vrrl.ar•l1r61't'::,♦wr■■ d//®Oi• r 1111: ••1=•r qa► a yj I ' .' - - _r.",.I .4 \\\ /.mum 6, r0i,■ • i- ...�l. .'" •N7 GA. W .''.,1.'�'ii,",/;',,;:�., :4fi.i�;!:7:1:1--4 sr let'r: ;.a';"•,. Q•i�r' - ♦ ♦ [p® �` , ,♦ a®1111 Waisitl�.m 1 7 tLla 1111► a��•r .a ly l-. ,u1rr ...ti„: .F .- r',v m 1 o ligipasn tom. ■ ■1*AS.,,Y rP1/ / `lia Alm i1e1/ let Hew' ^■_wr a r.El."-.1,-. 0;k, . 1-_ ., •y:.. ■► y.F', ro m '/ C- is/♦/I/.TI '/",v i:,>•,4*; ,i® n►J.air►r.a cum=aflra ii ^®r 21,■r fi ni �11�i►niiii pumas,i ''''rq�.iul ■,!_%✓.,', '-`-"'I� • `:f6•.'^,{. .i®�lO1I�O.r/��:-'!��i9�`[♦A •�` t/1.�." WR:4Sm�. 1111 v 1111 •iA/iae -7� e. r�,Q `� '�•,,,.'-. O' 0 CO _/ ♦ {�-.x+� .� i'�� ."",11 •11, �1,i Isiz. 'r:'1%'.`.,",:1111 i■cl�a.lrag11!,� :hI ./•.q r..w' i,'. .,.�. ♦...0,•v ./■t �' ;:r+,s�; pan!Illwl `,� :;ilk r:e: 1 1111 , - �. t.. 1 4/4, � sir :�oi♦r �.r..�R..Am ��a■.ai: „s, �lil /rI, +.,�. i=1O■. _'"���' '�;'s •'•1 _hi wi►'i11 ■ r,r v•I. : v ,;l,,,,, q..► 1Rlr, ♦ 11■tta...„,irl.r ..�. '�i•t .. rr■ •./,r:, ♦ ,I'' ♦ v ♦d_ --r"wm ar m4°e.,'.r,P•: �, pyial gym(.1//� i"' ' F - itr •�♦ ^ •.611 .m r:i -1111■ � ■ �'i:i'f':,,:. . a- 'r ( ii ♦ �� �,` `:t�` iO ♦ .1�'o Ill�.'fi:au• 66 �1 ±77.7.73, _ - .0111.. VO d�,:ii"':.�:*1111.. i _BRI :u 1 / \+ "O•• • ♦.••e m/slam 7 I'M'®I'1:: .. - 12-I A v a 1 �, ( • ♦ j� I f I - 1111. O :.1. _it '/ ', \v �, i,':.1I►►I..♦ •♦moo do :01) �. _ -'1'r - i!,-,:O� r;:r.'.;r'k;,,Ji:;,r: '; .a®�$ ��' �� 1111 ♦�.. :i••+••`>•i•\� ���g3R1111M■19°(•; %;s: `.,1 •R:1:1 @I R,,_ Gas-.` 1i�21�4i�R►� :' 1•Ire°. 0 v:00#4,0,•00.-1141,,.,• O... 9 .10 �/.laa r^11■6x•11 1.�I'■■.=_ �In1 '%� �D i' � • 9{11�ill�aiai® ■■1111 " , „ t►t1.:..uml�1,� [�all..ur:, %�J•-1c.. ,� "+ N _m!_ a +.bll® ,i' �► ® ♦1\ .� �i0 j �1 r•(9ai li,� `I V,7t11,.b•I �•, 1111!:dlilll�I\l♦i o \ mru` N �i r-0� ( •� �, i 0��� ���► •// 9�.o,..rai IEM°nre o.®as.,rm 1 IIt6.\+....A��.�....:� O X111 q mr 11 11... �, t 4 V 410,0_,1,, .,Vs �{� „ �,/ O®g... . mrl a•dittetta i el o , v► � ' / �� .I� 1111® Y � p� .c� a�.t1 I IIII I u°,� d••ury%_�^`� � i•��►1' Bill ® /tee® Y� �� �e••\`�i I�Qr \®m°r a►_��r$l°.....�M�AI��16fi®Aiiv T'�� .s 1111- ao■/n'�� / E `� /�i'• A~".\.jd\♦i L�. All 1.4.♦,a@\�. ma■.r2,60®et /b_r.VIFRI■Z.,w r' ii. .'wlla .MM:2g. I N ®® d 6 0 B�� ® �i 1 +•�!••''�•�d��l°° �ffi■..�■em.. ®li[:IrB ^.�: ��e. a I=.11rnu_��:�=r •t al ♦• ♦ �. • ,I'• g r ��- 1111.. r ti;:v; .�, ii s®���� # ,,� , 0 �...,.,vr ",.9 t(-®.11 moles.rae .I s..V -rar i- 7 J: %`` -1� &- Z ��� � ♦-� tali I®m r°� � \ . .■►�_IL•..III R11►w.-• ♦11��'=:n `InatA'H `=7 r i. 4���r•ra • �♦4• ��1•1+:�� S / �",►••.\s�•i•irp mm1 I®tl !>m sir�@/ ir.t9 L1111�� �7rt��IPi:11 P..: �y....y„�=- y. ' ' `•,■1x111. ► ifi.4 ' •. �� `�uP..b.biw r 1.� ■r �� a 11■m 1..,E • ,'.i -' iC•i1.f il:: w a "'rt 4ll,.',ad+. •\ �s °��yg11I1 .■►119@ r�CA�v r.,: .•�, .ia:�oo !��i•.,r ■ 0 I , �� 111`�f ��r`4" [I t �y,,,m:„ ;;;'thlIFR4a 11! srid @'. Er 361m 11 ., i.1 .. ♦/•.Va- I -�I■arr, `. H ®1 ��� ataG•*8:��� set* ��®® ,:a r'to �77!!l qa!Ws ® R s mrlr=r ,lid: :% 1111::::nut,..ISr► v. • Xl '�'°' ®1 11 0 ♦ .:`. ♦♦ ,I� `viii. ':;i ,r gl■....41 o los e1// 1r :1111.: !; -�t1..Aa s•,.... I�..::;e U L _ �'I� "VAR• ♦Iq ri/ iy4`•\`al �'; t 00 Q�,a.tea■19 OAra..,. V9at�lYm�° I'L'a z ;�°��/sj os�r ►• s., 1111 1111... :1111 r 1111, I. •'a0�r>.�L_��` _1111 .it f4 ,.�a•Q'►P.a� Mme.'' ' ar Erer... _ mr®+r °_1111 _ - ___-i��. _1111.__ -____.-_ I_ J■__._ -__•■_1111 __-__1111.__ 11_____ 11 _._ _ __ 1111• 1111 _11___11- ._ _-_11_1111_11_ _ ____1111 _11__ ___11__._.__- .'u • • 0IQ�oo�—Dl9CX�3. ED MURPHY & ASSOCIATES Lund Use Plan:zing and Development Services FAX TRANSMITTAL MEMO To: City of Tigard ATTN: Matt Scheidegger, Assistant Planner FAx#: 503-684-7297 DATE: 11/4/02 • RE: Request for Postponement, Yun Hong, SyKart ZC hearing MESSAGE: Matt, we have completed the structural evaluation of the building at 8205 SW Hunziker Street, and have received some preliminary estimates from a couple contractors for bringing the building at up to current seismic standards. The work that would have to be done to the building is substantial, and the ballpark estimates are considerably higher than we anticipated. The applicant, Mr. Hong, and the property owner, Knez Realty Group, need additional time to evaluate these figures and to determine whether it is financially feasible to move forward with the proposed project. At this time, therefore, we are requesting a continuance of the public hearing until the Planning Commission's next scheduled meeting, which I believe is November 18th. Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience that this postponement may cause to the staff, Planning Commission members, or any neighbors that attend this hearing. Thank-you Matt. ■Phone 503. 624-4625 ■Fax 503.968.1674 Nejmurphy @aol.com • • P . - - s'�F� �..'- mot' :A=:G E.N D A -,FA City of Tigard TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ShapvzgA BecrerCarn,vority NOVEMBER 4, 2002 7:00 p.m. TIGARD CIVIC CENTER — TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OREGON 97223 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. COMMUNICATIONS 4. APPROVE MINUTES 5. PUBLIC HEARING — CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 21, 2002 5.1 ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2002-00003 SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to change the existing zone from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) in order to convert an old industrial building into a "SyKart Indoor Racing Center." LOCATION: 8205 SW Hunziker Street; WCTM 2S101 BC, Tax Lot 200. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off- site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.530. 6. HOME OCCUPATIONS — DISCUSSION ITEM/WORKSHOP 7. OTHER BUSINESS 8. ADJOURNMENT • • Pa-f4j AEG=EN=DA - cq •y=' V H�A140 .� I �7 City of Tigard TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION "te Shaping n aping A Better Carmaaaty OCTOBER 21, 2002 7:00 p.m. TIGARD CIVIC CENTER—TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OREGON 97223 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. COMMUNICATIONS 4. APPROVE MINUTES 5. PUBLIC HEARING 5.1 ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2002-00003 SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to change the existing zone from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) in order to convert an old industrial building into a "SyKart Indoor Racing Center." LOCATION: 8205 SW Hunziker Street; WCTM 25101 BC, Tax Lot 200. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off- site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.530. 6. UPDATE ON LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECTS 7. CIP UPDATE 8. OTHER BUSINESS 9. ADJOURNMENT • • Agenda Item: 5.1 Hearing Date: October 21,2002 Time: 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF TIGARD Community FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Devel opment Shaping A Better Community'' 120 DAYS = 1/18/2003 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE CASE NO.: Zone Change (ZON) ZON2002-00003 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval to change the existing zone from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) in order to convert an old industrial building into a "SyKart Indoor Racing Center." APPLICANT: Yun S. Hong OWNER: Knez Realty Group 17450 West Valley Hwy. 8185 SW Hunziker Street Tukwila, WA 98188-5511 Tigard, OR 97223-8229 LOCATION: 8205 SW Hunziker Street; WCTM 2S101 BC, Tax Lot 200. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. Among other uses, indoor entertainment is allowed. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.530; and Comprehensive Plan Policies 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 12. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission issue an APPROVAL of the requested Zone Change: STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 10-21-2002 PUBLIC HEARING ZON2002-00003/SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE PAGE 1 OF 10 • • ! '. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History The property has been zoned for industrial uses for many years. The building located on the site was originally built in 1960 by Irvington-Moore, which used it to manufacture machinery for plywood mills until 1996, when Knez Realty Group LLC acquired it. It has been used since that time by Power Rents (for storing and repairing equipment) and Safeway Scaffolding, and is now used by Knez Building Materials to store sheet rock. The property was zoned M-3, Light Industrial, in August 1977. In 1982 the M-3 zone was revised, and renamed I-L. Certain uses, such as offices, were no longer allowed in the I-L zone. In 1988, the adjacent property, (2S101 BC-00201), was rezoned from I-L to I-P at the request of the property owner. The building on that parcel, built in 1973 under the classification of a "public utility", became a permitted office use under the I-P zone. In 1997, the 2-story office portion of the building located on the subject property was completely remodeled and upgraded by Power Rents. The upgrade included handicapped accessible restrooms on the ground floor under (BUP97-0319.) At that time, Mr. Knez constructed a handicapped accessible walkway from SW Hunziker. Vicinity Information The subject property is bordered on the southwest by the 2-story office building mentioned above, zoned I-P and to the east and southwest by industrial buildings, zoned I-L. The area to the north of the property is zoned General Commercial (C-G) and is developed as a business park. There is a mix of industrial and office uses along SW Hunziker Street, zoned I-P and I-L. There are single-family detached homes on the west side of the property, zoned R-4.5, served by Knoll Drive. The closest home is approximately 250 feet from the building located on the subject property. Site Information And Proposal Description The applicant is requesting approval to change the existing zone from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) in order to convert an old industrial building into a "SyKart Indoor Racing Center." The proposed use will fit under the indoor entertainment use category which is allowed in the I-P zone and not within the I-L zone. With the abutting property to the south zoned I-P and properties across SW Hunziker zoned I-P, a campus-like setting is established due to the extent that each of the surrounding properties have developed. The I-P zone still allows for light-industrial uses, however, it also allows for a wider range of uses, making the property more marketable. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.380 Chapter 18.380 states that a recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application for a quasi judicial amendment shall be based on all of the following standards: Demonstration of compliance with all applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designations. The applicable Comprehensive Plan Polices are as follows. In virtually all cases, the Comprehensive Plan treats the I-L and I-P zones interchangeably. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 10-21-2002 PUBLIC HEARING ZON2002-00003/SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE PAGE 2 OF 10 • • 2. CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT: 2.1.1 The City shall maintain an ongoing citizen involvement program and shall assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process. - On behalf of Mr. Hong, the applicant, Mr. Ed Murphy sent out notices to surrounding property owners and neighborhood representatives, posted a sign on the property, and held a neighborhood meeting on August 15, 2002 in accordance with the City of Tigard's neighborhood meeting notification process. According to the minutes of the neighborhood meeting, nine property owners were in attendance. No objections were given to the proposed zone change. The applicant discussed the proposed indoor racing use and the impacts that it would have on the area. Mr. Hong presented one of the go-karts that would be used with the business and started it up in order for the attendants to hear the level of noise that would be produced. Other items discussed were exterior lighting, hours of operation, loitering and storage of fuel for the go-karts. 3. NATURAL FEATURES AND OPEN SPACE: 3.1.1 The City shall not allow development in areas having the following development limitations except where it can be shown that established and proven engineering techniques related to a specific site plan will make the area suitable for the proposed development. (note: this policy does not apply to lands designated as significant wetlands on the floodplain and wetlands map.): a. Areas meeting the definition of wetlands under Chapter 1.26 of the community development code. b. Areas having a severe soil erosion potential; c. Areas subject to slumping, earth slides or movement; d. Areas having slopes in excess of 25%; or e. Areas having severe weak foundation soils. A very small area of the property along the northern property line contain wetlands. However, the building and parking area are pre-existing uses, and no expansion of either is planned. There will be no impact to the wetlands as a result of this zone change. The property does not have any of the other development limitations listed above. Therefore, this policy has been satisfied. 5. ECONOMY: 5.1 The City shall promote activities aimed at the diversification of the economic opportunities available to Tigard residents with particular emphasis placed on the growth of the local job market. 5.4 The City shall ensure that new commercial and industrial development shall not encroach into residential areas that have not been designated for commercial or industrial uses. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES: 14. The City shall encourage the location and development of economic activities which .meet the occupational and employment needs of all City residents, particularly the unemployed and underemployed. According to the applicant's narrative, The proposed use itself will employ about five people. This is not a large amount of employment, but it is more than are employed for the current use, which is warehousing sheet rock. In addition, there are positive economic benefits from the proposed indoor racing facility, particularly to lodging and restaurant businesses in the area. The facility is located close to downtown Tigard. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 10-21-2002 PUBLIC HEARING ZON2002-00003/SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE PAGE 3 OF 10 • • • ry The proposed use is not new development, the use will occur entirely within an existing building. However, the proposed I-P zone will offer better protection to the neighborhood from potential future uses than the I-L zone currently does. Therefore, Policies 5.1 and 5.4 have been satisfied. 7. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES: 7.1.2 The City shall require as a pre-condition to development approval that; a. Development coincide with the availability of adequate service capacity including: 1. Public water; 2. Public sewer shall be required for new development within the city unless the property involved in over 300 feet from a sewer line and Washington County Health Department approval for a private disposal system is obtained; and 3. Storm drainage. b. The facilities are: 1. Capable of adequately serving all intervening properties and the proposed development; and 2. Designed to city standards. c. All new development utilities to be placed underground. The existing building is already connected to public water, public sewer and public storm drainage, all of which have adequate service capacity. Therefore, Policy 7.1.2 has been met. 8. TRANSPORTATION: 8.1.1 Plan, design and construct transportation facilities in a manner which enhances the livability of Tigard by: a. Proper location and design of transportation facilities. b. Encouraging pedestrian accessibility by providing safe, secure and desirable pedestrian routes. c. Addressing issues of excessive speeding and through traffic on local residential streets through a neighborhood traffic program. The program should address corrective measures for existing problems and asure that development incorporates traffic calming. 8.1.2 Provide a balanced transportation system, incorporating all modes of • transportation (including motor vehicle, bicycle, pedestrian, transit and other modes) by: a. The development of and implementation of public street standards that recognize the multi-purpose nature of the street right-of-way for utility, pedestrian, bicycle, transit, truck and auto use. b. Coordination with Tri-met, and/or any other transit providers serving Tigard, to improve transit service to Tigard. Fixed route transit will primarily use arterial and collector streets in Tigard. Development adjacent to transit routes will provide direct pedestrian accessibility. c. Construction of bicycle lanes on all arterials and collectors within Tigard consistent with the bicycle master. All schools, parks, public facilities and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a bikeway. d. Construction of sidewalks on all streets within Tigard. All schools, parks, public facilities and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a sidewalk. e. Development of bicycle and pedestrian plans which link to recreational trails. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 10-21-2002 PUBLIC HEARING ZON2002-00003/SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE PAGE 4 OF 10 • • f. Design local streets to encourage a reduction in trip length by providing connectivity and limiting out-of-direction travel and provide connectivity to activity centers and destinations with a priority for bicycle and pedestrian connections. g. Tigard will participate in vehicle trip reduction strategies developed regionally targeted to achieve non-single occupant vehicle levels outlined in Table 1.3 of the Regional Transportation Plan. h. Tigard will support the development of a commuter rail system as part of the regional transit network. 8.1.4 Set and maintain transportation performance measures that: a. Set a minimum intersection level of service standard for the City of Tigard and requires all public facilities to be designed to meet this standard. b. Set parking ratios to provide adequate parking, while providing an incentive to limit the use of the single occupant vehicle. c. Encourage working with other transportation providers in Washington County, including Tri-Met, Metro and ODOT to develop, operate and maintain intelligent transportation systems, including coordination of traffic. The subject property has an existing driveway onto SW Hunziker. The City may require additional dedication of land to meet current street right-of-way requirements for a "regional access bikeway", in order to accommodate bicycle traffic. However, the dedication of right- of-way will be addressed under Site Development Review. The proposed use may generate transit ridership. The Tri-Met bus stop for the #38 and #78 bus lines are located on Hunziker Street, directly in front of the site. The applicant will work with Tri-Met to make any reasonable pedestrian or transit-oriented improvements that will encourage transit ridership. The project will meet the requirements of Section 18.810 of the Tigard Development Code regarding transit facilities. The Site Plan will also be reviewed by Tn-Met as part of the Site Development review application. All on-site parking and circulation will be done to City specifications, although a variance or adjustment will be sought, if necessary, to reduce the amount of parking from the 4.3 spaces/1000 square feet of building space required by the Tigard Development Code for indoor recreation: 9. ENERGY: 9.1.3 The City shall encourage land use development which emphasizes sound energy conservation,.design and construction. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 8. The City shall coordinate with and support public and private planning efforts that advocate alternative forms of transportation such as mass transit, carpooling, ride share, bicycling and walking for commuter purposes. Customers may walk to the indoor racing facility, bicycle, car-pool, take a bus, come with a group in a van or bus, or drive their own vehicle. There are several available modes of transportation by which customers can get to and from the facility. Therefore, the application complies with Policy 9.1.3. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 10-21-2002 PUBLIC HEARING ZON2002-00003/SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE PAGE 5 OF 10 • • 12. LOCATIONAL CRITERIA: 12.3 INDUSTRIAL. The intent of the industrial land use designation is to: 1. Provide for the designation of suitable lands for industrial use; 2. Provide for economic growth and development; 3. Protect existing and potential lands suitable for industrial development from. encroachment by non-industrial or incompatible uses; 4. Provide land for industrial use by type to minimize the impact on surrounding development; and 5. Take advantage of existing transportation facilities. Industrial lands are classified as: Heavy industrial lands are areas intended to provide for manufacturing, processing and assembling activities. Uses within this classification are characterized by large buildings and large storage areas and as having associated external effects such as smoke, noise, odor or visual pollution. Light industrial lands are areas intended to provide for manufacturing, processing, assembling and related office activities. Uses within this classification are of a size and scale which makes them generally compatible with other non-industrial uses and which have no off-site effects. The subject site is adjacent to a residential zone and a two-story office building located in an I-P zone. The use that has been proposed to occupy the subject site if the zone change is approved will go through the City's Site Development Review process, where off-site effects will be addressed and conditions will be imposed to ensure that there are no off-site effects. The land use map designates specific areas of the city for industrial development. Over time, however, there may be a demand for new sites. Therefore, the following policy will apply in making such decisions. 12.3.1 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE THAT: a. Sites for heavy industrial development shall be: (1) Separated by topography established buffers, transportation or other non-residential land uses from residentially developed areas.. (2) Located in areas having rail service, arterial or major collector access. b. Sites for light industrial development shall be: (1) Buffered from residential areas to ensure that privacy and the residential character of the area are preserved. (2) Located on an arterial or collector street and that industrial traffic shall not be channeled through residential areas. c. The site shall be of a size and shape which will provide for the short and log range needs of the use. d. The land intended for development shall have an average site topography of less than 6% grade, or that it can be demonstrated that through engineering techniques all- limitations to development and the provision of services can be mitigated. e. It can be demonstrated that associated lights, noise and other external effects will not interfere with the activities and uses on surrounding properties. f. All other applicable plan policies can be met. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 10-21-2002 PUBLIC HEARING ZON2002-00003/SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE PAGE 6 OF 10 . • • IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. Industrial development adjacent to existing or planned residential areas shall be conditioned to ensure that: a. The specific proposed use will be compatible with adjacent uses; b. The design of the facility and its site will not place visual or physical burdens on the surrounding areas; c. The operational characteristics of the facility will be compatible with surrounding uses and include[s] consideration of; 1 Delivery and shipping characteristics; 2 Hours of operation; 3 Noise; 4 Lighting; and 5 Other use characteristics. The subject property, because it is adjacent to an R-4.5 zone, and abuts another I-P zoned property, would be more appropriately zoned I-P than I-L. The proposed site improvements will ensure that the adjacent residential area is not adversely impacted with light, noise or other external effects. The applicant proposes and will be conditioned under Site Development Review to shroud all external lights to eliminate glare from adjacent properties. The applicant will also be required to show that the proposed use for the subject property (indoor go-kart racing) will not exceed applicable noise levels. According to the applicant, all activities will take place indoors, the go-karts are equipped with catalytic converters and mufflers, and are not full size racecars. The doors on the west side, that but the R-4.5 zone will not be left open during operation of the go-karts. The fans for the building will all be on the east side of the existing building. The I-P zoning district requires that 25 percent of all sites to be developed be landscaped and all industrial uses that abut residential zones have a minimum buffer equal to 25 feet, which includes a minimum of trees, berms and shrubs. Currently there is approximately 32 1/2 feet between the existing building on the subject site and the abutting residential zone to the west. Therefore, the applicant will be required at Site Development Review to comply as closely to the required standards as possible. Possible conditions may include closing off west side of the subject building to all traffic. Creation of outdoor open space on the west side of the building to meet buffering standards and the campus like setting which is the intent of the I-P zoning district may also be feasible. The applicant has mentioned in pre-application meetings that a variance to parking will most likely be applied for to reduce the number of required parking. Therefore, more square footage would be available for landscaping and creative ideas to lessen the impact of the proposed and future uses for the property. 18.380.030.B.2 Demonstration of compliance with all applicable standards of any provision of this code or other applicable implementing ordinance; and The proposed SyKart Indoor Racing Center would be within an old industrial building, which was built many years prior to the adoption of the current development standards. No expansion of the building or the site will be proposed, nor any additional paving. The building meets the maximum height restrictions, and the maximum site coverage. The parking lot is landscaped with existing trees, and the building has direct pedestrian access from Hunziker Street to the front door of the building. Hunziker Street is fully improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk. The applicant has submitted a traffic study with the narrative. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 10-21-2002 PUBLIC HEARING ZON2002-00003/SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE PAGE 7 OF 10 • • • While it may not be feasible to meet all of the current standards of the Development Code, due to the non-conformity of the existing structure, it will be possible to bring the site closer to conformance with those standards. Further, if the site redevelops entirely, or new development is added on the north end of the parcel, through Site Development Review, that new development will be better able to meet all of the current standards of the I-P zone. 18.380.030.8.3 Evidence of change in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to the property which is the subject of the development application. Typically, a lighter industrial zone borders a residential zone. From reviewing the City of Tigard's zoning map, it is clear that this is the case. For instance, the residential neighborhood at the south end of SW Hunziker Street, served by SW Fir and Varns Streets, is zoned R-4.5 and is surrounded by I-P and C-P (Commercial Professional) zones. Similarly, the I-P zone has been applied along SW Tigard Street, which also abuts a residential neighborhood zoned R-4.5. The same situation exists along SW Durham Road, where the residentially zoned properties on the north side of SW Durham Road where the residentially zoned properties on the north side of SW Durham Road abut I-P zoning on the south side of SW Durham Road. In fact, the only other place where I-L zoning abuts a residential zone is ust south of the railroad tracks, east of the Senior Center. In this area, the residential neighborhoods are separated from the industrial uses by a wide wetland and floodplain buffer. The only place in the City where R-4.5 zoning abuts I-L zoning where the actual uses are not physically separated by wetlands and/or floodplains, is the subject site. The subject property was most likely originally zoned industrial because an industrial building was already there. The M-3 zone, applied in 1977, was also most likely applied based on the existing use, warehouse, as was the case in 1982, when the I-L zone was established. Had the property been vacant, or had it been used for an office building, like the property adjacent to the south, it most likely would have been zoned I-P. This is evident from reading the staff report and Planning Commission minutes from the zone change of 1988 which was a request to change the property to the south (2S101 BC-00201) of the subject site (2S101 BC-00200) from an I-L zoning designation to an I-P designation. That is, a lighter I-P zone should have been originally applied next to the R-4.5 zone, and most likely would have been, had it not been for the existing use (warehouse). If the subject property was already zoned I-P, and an application asked for a zone change to I-L an argument against the hypothetical zone change would likely be that it is adjacent to R-4.5 and single-family neighborhood, and, therefore, would not be the appropriate zone. I-P is a "lighter" zone. The types of uses allowed and prohibited are more compatible with a residential area than the types of uses allowed in the I-L zoning district. Considering the purpose statement of the industrial zoning district, it states "The location of land within each industrial district must be carefully selected, and design and development standards created to minimize the potential adverse impacts of industrial activity on established residential areas." The zoning map is therefore inconsistent in the zoning of this property. Based on the zoning patterns in other areas of the City, the location of land was not carefully selected in this case, as the property should have been zoned I-P to limit the industrial activity on established residential areas. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the standards outlined in Section 18.380 have been addressed and satisfied. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 10-21-2002 PUBLIC HEARING ZON2002-00003/SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE PAGE 8 OF 10 II • • SECTION V. ADDITIONAL STAFF AND OUTSIDE AGENCY COMMENTS City of Tigard Operations Manager/Water Department have reviewed this proposal and offered no comments or objections City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and offered no comments or objections. City of Tigard Long Range Planning Department has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: • General objection to changing the zone to one that allows more non-industrial uses. Any industrial land in Tigard is in short supply, especially for truly industrial uses that requires the I-L zone and are not permitted in I-P zones. City of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: • My comments will be limited to the impacts on the transportation system. There will be no adverse impacts on any other public facility. CTS Engineers, Inc. submitted a report dated September 9, 2002. The overall purpose of the report was to identify the intersections in the vicinity of this site that may be impacted by this zone change, compare the existing Levels of Service (LOS) during the PM Peak Hour with a variety of scenarios: 1) Maximum build-out under the current I-L zone, 2) maximum build-out under the proposed I-P zone, and 3) build-out per the proposed Sykart Indoor Racing Center (SIRC). The CTS report identified the following intersections as the most critical for analysis: • Hall Boulevard/Scoffins Street/Hunziker Street (signalized) • Hunziker Street/72" Avenue (signalized) • Hunziker Street/Site Driveway (unsignalized). Staff concurred with the selection of critical intersections. CTS determined that the current LOS for the three intersections during the weekday PM Peak Period are as follows: • Hall Boulevard/Scof[ins Street/Hunziker Street: LOS C • Hunziker Street/72" Avenue: LOS. C • Hunziker Street/Site Driveway: LOS B CTS then performed a comparison of the three scenarios mentioned above. For the worst case full build-out in the I-L zone, they used the Light Industrial category (ITE 110). For the worst case full build-out in the I-P zone, they used the General Office category (ITE 710). For the Sykart scenario, they used actual driveway count data obtained from other Sykart facilities in the state of Washington. The following is a comparison of the PM Peak Hour trip generation that could be experienced from the subject site, assuming a 70,000 sf facility (current building size): • I-L Zone, Light Industrial: 69 PM Peak trips • I-P Zone, General Office: 104 PM Peak trips • Sykart Project: 20 PM Peak trips. It can easily be seen that the Sykart project will not generate a significant amount of trips during the PM Peak period. However, it is still important to compare the worst case scenarios of the two zones. CTS then compared the expected LOS (Weekday PM Peak) for the critical intersections, based on the worst case trip generations mentioned above. The following is a summary of their findings: STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 10-21-2002 PUBLIC HEARING ZON2002-00003/SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE PAGE 9 OF 10 • • Intersection LOS (I-L) LOS (I-P) LOS (Sykart) • Hall/Scoffins/c-lunziker C C C • Hunziker/72n D D C • Hunziker/Site Driveway C C B Based on that comparison, there would be no additional impact to the estimated LOS of the critical intersections by rezoning this site to I-P. To further bolster that opinion, it is interesting to compare the volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratios of the two signalized intersections under the same scenarios. When V/C approaches 1.0, a given intersection is near failing. Below is a comparison of the V/C ratios: Intersection V/C (I-L) V/C (I-P) V/C (Sykart) • Hall/Scoffins/c-lunziker 0.79 0.80 0.79 • Hunziker/72n 0.86 0.87 0.85 Again, there is no significant change to the critical intersections as a result of the rezoning. Based on the information above, I would support the proposed zone change. SECTION VI. STAFF ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION Based on the information above, the proposed zone change complies with the applicable Development Code chapters and Comprehensive Plan. Staff finds that the proposed zone change from I-L to I-P does not reduce industrially zoned lands in the City of Tigard or significantly reduce the types of activities that would be allowed on the subject property. The I-P zoning district does allow a broader range of uses that will expand the range of possible tenants for the property in the future. As discussed above, the abutting residential zone is the only zone in Tigard that is adjacent to an I-L zone that is not separated by a significant wetland. All other industrial zones that abut residential properties are zoned I-P. According to Tigard's Engineering Department, the change from I-L to I-P will not have a significant impact on the street system and there are adequate services to the property. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the requested zone change. Or1 October 10, 2002 PREP A RE gger DATE Assista t tanner October 10, 2002 APPROVED BY: Dick Bewersdo r DATE Planning Manger i:\curpinkmathew\zon\zon2002-00003 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 10-21-2002 PUBLIC HEARING ZON2002-00003/SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE PAGE 10 OF 10 • • • MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: October 9, 2002 TO: Matt Scheidegger, Assistant Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer TS-- RE: ZON 2002-00003, Sykart Indoor Racing Center Zone Change My comments will be limited to the impacts on the transportation system. There will be no adverse impacts on any other public facility. CTS Engineers, Inc. submitted a report dated September 9, 2002. The overall purpose of the report was to identify the intersections in the vicinity of this site that may be impacted by this zone change, compare the existing Levels of Service (LOS) during the PM Peak Hour with a variety of scenarios: 1) Maximum build-out under the current I-L zone, 2) maximum build-out under the proposed I-P zone, and 3) build-out per the proposed Sykart Indoor Racing Center (SIRC). The CTS report identified the following intersections as the most critical for analysis: • Hall Boulevard/Scoffins Street/Hunziker Street (signalized) • Hunziker Street/72nd Avenue (signalized) • Hunziker Street/Site Driveway (unsignalized). Staff concurred with the selection of critical intersections. CTS determined that the current LOS for the three intersections during the weekday PM Peak Period are as follows: • Hall Boulevard/Scoffins Street/Hunziker Street: LOS C • Hunziker Street/72nd Avenue: LOS C • Hunziker Street/Site Driveway: LOS B CTS then performed a comparison of the three scenarios mentioned above. For the worst case full build-out in the I-L zone, they used the Light Industrial category (ITE 110). For the worst case full build-out in the I-P zone, they used the General Office category (ITE 710). For the Sykart scenario, they used actual driveway count data obtained from other Sykart facilities in the state of Washington. The following is a comparison of the PM Peak Hour trip generation that could be experienced from the subject site, assuming a 70,000 sf facility (current building size): • I-L Zone, Light Industrial: 69 PM Peak trips • I-P Zone, General Office: 104 PM Peak trips • Sykart Project: 20 PM Peak trips. • • • It can easily be seen that the Sykart project will not generate a significant amount of trips during the PM Peak period. However, it is still important to compare the worst case scenarios of the two zones. CTS then compared the expected LOS (Weekday PM Peak)for the critical intersections, based on the worst case trip generations mentioned above. The following is a summary of their findings: Intersection LOS (I-L) LOS (I-P) LOS (Sykart) • Hall/Scoffins/Hunziker C C C • Hunziker/72nd D D C • Hunziker/Site Driveway C C B Based on that comparison, there would be no additional impact to the estimated LOS of the critical intersections by rezoning this site to I-P. To further bolster that opinion, it is interesting to compare the volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratios of the two signalized intersections under the same scenarios. When V/C approaches 1.0, a given intersection is near failing. Below is a comparison of the V/C ratios: Intersection V/C (I-L) V/C (I-P) V/C (Sykart) • Hall/Scoffins/Hunziker 0.79 0.80 0.79 • Hunziker/72nd 0.86 0.87 0.85 Again, there is no significant change to the critical intersections as a result of the rezoning. Based on the information above, I would support the proposed zone change. i:1eng\brianr\comments\zon2002-00003-sykart.doc PAGE 2 I 9 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLUER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION,AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 21, 2002 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO.: ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2002-00003 FILE TITLE: SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE APPLICANT: Yun S. Hong OWNER: Knez Realty Group 17450 West Valley Hwy. 8185 SW Hunziker Street Tukwila, WA 98188-5511 Tigard, OR 97223-8229 APPLICANT'S Ed Murphy &Associates REP.: 9875 SW Murdock Street Tigard, OR 97224 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to change the existing zone from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) in order to convert an old industrial building into a "SyKart Indoor Racing Center." LOCATION: 8205 SW Hunziker Street; WCTM 25101 BC, Tax Lot 200. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.530. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. t ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT *TEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPO. ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE OR DOCUMENTS LESS THAN 7 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE, THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY MAY ALLOW A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING, SUBJECT TO ORS 215.428 OR 227.178. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN(7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL BE BASED UPON THE CRITERIA LISTED OR OTHER CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH THE PERSON BELIEVES TO APPLY TO THE DECISION. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST, ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25 ) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MATHEW SCHEIDEGGER AT(503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. --' "-----'- --- --"-'-'"--- CITY o f TIGARD VICINITY MAP$ s914 IN ■ : .. s , 10N2002-00003 ill , �1r� *� SYKART INDOOR RACING ' '►.•i �, ZONE CHANGE 99/ AIL_ rmr III tu" : 1* 41,, i 9� �.;�� x`. '11 , �� • � . J, ♦ 1?4. L K&o, C?txw 6aPA WA' 1 \- tleM b vib C N M OwMem+ f�Re ONbb 13123 cw w.a.a -I MP 00-4171 • • AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL IMPORTANT:NOTICE: THIS AFFIDAVIT;MUST BE":ACCOMPANIED: BY A COPY OF THE NOTICE,{THAT WAS;POSTED AN THE ISITF, a3 k ;. In the Matter of the Proposed Land Use Applications for: Land Use File Nos.:- ZON2002-00003 Land Use File Name: SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE I, Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner for the City of Tigard, do affirm that I posted notice of the land use proposal affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) /0/ .BG-a-oz 9 and did personally post notice of the proposed land use application(s) by means of weatherproof posting in the general vicinity of the affected territory, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the =3-1 day of_5. 4.- ,c€/ , 2002. ire • - - in Who Pe• •r•• -d Posting (In the presence of e Notary) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the Z1,/'day of ; , 20 a Z.. .�,;;TN• OFFICIAL SEAL =ate SSKERpJ:A S.CASPER f veto NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON NOTARY PUBLIC OF O'EGON COMMISSION NO.323409 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 13,2003 My Commission Expires: NV 3,24.)(1? h:Vogin\patty\masters\affidavit of posting for applicant to post public hearing.doc NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING t-. The following will be considered by the Tigard Planning Commission on Monday October 21, 2002 at 7:00 PM at the Tigard Civic Center-Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. Both public oral and written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with Chapter 18.390 of the Tigard Municipal Code, and the rules of procedures adopted by the Hearings Officer. Testimony may be submitted in writing prior to or at the public hearing or verbally at the public hearing only. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior to the close of the hearing accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to afford the decision-maker an opportunity to respond to the issue precludes appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeal based on that issue and failure to specify the criterion from the Community. Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division (staff contact: Mathew Scheidegger) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 503-639-4171. A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven (7) days prior to the hearing, and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM: ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2002-00003 > SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE Q REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to change the existing zone from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) in order to convert an old industrial building into a "SyKart Indoor Racing Center." LOCATION: 8205 SW Hunziker Street; WCTM 2S101 BC, Tax Lot 200. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial W service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and • wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only -those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.530. gEQ065r e 0/11/11 E Al rS • • Oct 10,2002 Tigard Planning Commission Attn: Mathew Scheidegger 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,Oregon 97223 Re: Sykart Indoor Racing Center, 8205 SW Hunsiker St. WCTM 2S101BC,Tax Lot 200 Dear Mr. Scheidegger, I would like to voice my concerns about the Sykart Indoor Racing Center being proposed to be located in a renovated warehouse on Hunziker St in Tigard I feel that the noise level of these Go-Carts would be obnoxious at the very least This is a neighborhood of homes,apartments and light industrial business. We already have the steady hum of Hwy 217,the banging at Fought Steel Co. at times,and the intercom system of the car dealership at the corner of Hwy 99 and Hall.I cannot imagine what they could do to the warehouse building to COMPLETELY seal off the noise. Let alone the exhaust fumes coming from these carts. I do not feel that the City of Tigard should be changing the zoning code for this area just because this business wants to plant itself in the middle of town. I feel that this type of activity belongs on the outskirts of town,AWAY from residential areas and in areas already zoned for such activity. This is NOT what the city of Tigard needs,this will not improve the quality of our life,create many jobs—it sounds like it will just be a nuisance —that if it is allowed and noise problems are an issue that it will be difficult if not impossible to rectify or enforce rules. Bottom line,I feel that the Planning Commission really needs to understand what these Go-Karts are like,listen to the noise level they produce,perhaps visit an existing facility to see how they deal with the noise issue,and look seriously at the location and really ask it this is what Tigard needs. you your considerati into this very serious issue. Cathy Murphy N\(A 7675 SW Varns St. . Tigard,Oregon 97223 t cd■s-g ray . i e% J L., .6:r ilk :_iim , _.. ,, .or 411, 111 . .,..A ST ils r.� , 9 Q nAyi R 5T : � = ----E N LA A 7 I r' it alai.� . � ST � ...._ 1pA 4 * lllilI P..�� FRU TLAND — m 0 l ACRES /� EMI DARTMOUTH ST ill I Irtailli I I 1 1 \ B 6- ••._ G ■ • •./ � 1 EIMMU' T ST I C#411 : ♦ • 1111■� ff�ffl •• :�...-■ • q l 082 ....MI Am L CAITL ;,.�, illuallIM■ um summonas HALL ,• A . .,.... ...„..,Ir T m di EL CENTER 3 1 /mil swan - ?, 1 l al, ��� ���.. 6010ilisei r 10,1.11.■„„......,_ dollik. , . .„ ii,..,..,_. lion-- . ...m. 11111 .71k.",... m.P.a on ...misarma . . _ illad raNiTaill11 l■iriiiiiin Q-..mU0A 1111 ,� 1► iI1 !JIf ��`��. , rmate e a miii iiE1V17I � t•�.Eft s V . w_ li 1,RD ii din:rit mei rj2... _-1 as INN „ 1 3 moiling AA:. SONrtA RD F=ram ini rwmP'1111F if I NE,rx D-4 riji gir 1 § i 1111111M11111101M._-111 Billknimi.TZ 0071.11161.1 ! 01 UM A ,r. ,cm. WASH CO LAND DEV. Fax:503-846-2908 Oct 11 2002 1146 P.01 • • WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON 4111!1% Department of Land Use and Transportation,Land Development Services 155 North First Avenue,Suite 350-13,Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 (503)846-8761 •FAX(503)848-2908 October 11, 2002 Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner City of Tigard Community Development 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 FAX: (503)684-7297 RE: SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE City File Number: ZON 2002-00003 Tax Map and Lot Number: 2S1 01 BC Tax Lot 200 Location: 8205 SW Hunziker Street Applicant: Yun S. Hong, Sykart's Indoor Racing Center Owner: Knez Realty Group LLC l •' ;:z r �;. '1:!W. i . *k: j,, • NAPO* irk ■ 4 4;;;-.4, vo ..:., e 7 Sik 2S101BC00200 _ Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation has received notice of the above noted application but will not be submitting any requirements/conditions. The project site is not adjacent to County-maintained road sections, nor is it expected to generate considerable off-site impacts to our nearby roadways. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. If you have any questions, please contact me at 503-846-3873. .- Joy Lalic Ong Associa'1=lanner F:SylcartNocomc • • Bar # REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY HOARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: September 23,2002 TO: Barbara Shields,long Range Planning Manager FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner(x24311 Phone: (5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 ZONE CHANGE[ZONI 2002-00003 SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE Q REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to change the existing zone from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) in order to convert an old industrial building into a "SyKart Indoor Racing Center." LOCATION: 8205 SW Hunziker Street; WCTM 2S101BC, Tax Lot 200. CURRENT ZONE I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well- integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.530. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 21, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING,ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact - - - - 1 of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. ■ 1 Ive q 74-ief-9/ dice-ht;,, dgny y I� Written comments provided below: y� ` Z 7 c Zpnr Tom' a� 4 v i d//oL's /10, /1/2(Yus-'r +) (.4e3, iitt 11,7y .Tndvg�n;-•,/ ik Tate' mS "'ffy �S E6K47/ry "es 7/1";\.4 Ste` 2� /� c Name&Phone#of Person(s) Commenting: gWY11-At'.-f", [aye` -' . .. • • - m REQUEST FOR COMMENTS o`�'oARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: September 23,2002 TO: Dennis Koellermeier,Operations Manager/Water Department FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division RECEIVED PLANNING STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner 1x24311 SE P 2 5 2002 Phone: (5031 639-4111/Fax: (5031684-1291 CITY OF TS '.RD ZONE CHANGE IONI 2002-00003 SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE Q REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to change the existing zone from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) in order to convert an old industrial building into a "SyKart Indoor Racing Center." LOCATION: 8205 SW Hunziker Street; WCTM 2S101 BC, Tax Lot 200. CURRENT ZONE I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well- integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.530. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 21, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK:THE.FOLLOWING"ITEMS THAT APPLY:;;;.;-''' ... '-_ n'.:. We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name&Phone#of Person(s) Commenting: 'A} c72aOs • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C, `TILRD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: September 23,2002 TO: lim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner 1x24371 S E P 2 4 002 Phone: 15031639-4111/Fax: (5031684-1291 CITY OF YARD ZONE CHANGE[ZONI 2002-00003 SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE Q REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to change the existing zone from Light Industrial (I.L) to Industrial Park (I-P) in order to convert an old industrial building into a "SyKart Indoor Racing Center." LOCATION: 8205 SW Hunziker Street; WCTM 2S101 BC, Tax Lot 200. CURRENT ZONE I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well- integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.530. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 21, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THEEFOLLOWINGITEMSpTHAT APPLY:: II We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name& Phone#of Person(s)Commenting: � • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C,OFTIGARD Community Devetopment Shaping Better Community DATE: September 23,2002 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner 1x24311 Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: 15031684-1291 ZONE CHANGE an 2002-00003 SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE < — REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to change the existing zone from Light Industrial (I.-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) in order to convert an old industrial building into a "SyKart Indoor Racing Center." LOCATION: 8205 SW Hunziker Street; WCTM 2S101 BC, Tax Lot 200. CURRENT ZONE I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well- integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.530. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 21, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASECHEC,K:THE:FOLLOWING.ITEMS.THATAPPLY:: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name& Phone#of Person(s)Commenting: • CITY 0 TIGARD REQUEST FOR CM/GENTS .,y NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: 7f2..4/772--e7evo FILE NAME: - CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT:TEAMS '. -; ':•:n•.••• • ;• _••:,,.:..:',-. - 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: ❑Central ast ['South ['West ElProposal Descrip.in Library CIT Book CITY OFFICES K LONG RANGE PLANNING/Barbara Shields,Planning Mgr. COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPTJPlanning-Engineering Techs. le POLICE DEPTJJim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer To—BUILDING DMSION/Gary Lampella,Building Official r2,ENGINEERING DEPT/Brian Rager,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer?aWATER DEPT./Dennis Koellermeier,Operations Mgr. CITY ADMINISTRATIOWCathy Wheatley,City Recorder _PUBLIC WORKS/John Roy,Property Manager _PUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester PLANNER—POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM-10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING! C.DJSherman Casper,Permit Coord.(sDRicuP re:TIF) .,SPECIALDISTRICTS,.• _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*_ TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* _ CLEANWATER SERVICES• Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue • Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 :;:LOCAL AND.STATE'IURISDICTIONS-,s CITY OF BEAVERTON* _ CITY OF TUALATIN* _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue Jennifer Goodridge _ Irish Bunnell,Development Services PO Box 369 PO Box 59 775 Summer Street NE PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 _ OR.PUB.UTIUTIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE _ CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager (Aland.OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 Bob Knight,Data Resource center(ZCA) �7 US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator. ._OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP_Kathryn Harris _ Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA/ZOA) Larry French(Comp.Plan Amendments Only) Routing CENWP-OP-G _CITY OF KING CITY alt Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager X C.D..Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powedlnes in Area) _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division(Monopole Towers) 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO* Routing TTRC–Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Planning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 _Brent Curtis(CPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion(CPA) _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ' ODOT,REGION 1 * _Anne LaMountain(IGANRB) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for wetlands and Potential Environmental lmpacts) _Sonya Kazen,Development Review Coordinator _Phil Healy(IGA/JRB) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Div. Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) 04.Steve Conway(General Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm.1002 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Sr.Cartographer(OPaacA)MS,. 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Jim Nims(ZCA)his is Portland,OR 97204 _Doria Mateja(ZCA)his 14 WCCCA(911)(Monopole Towers) _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A * _y — Dave Austin Jane Estes,Permit Specialist 17911 NW Evergreen Parkway 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Beaverton,OR 97006 Portland,OR 97221-2414 ` :': ;;': -: :UTILITY'PROVIDERS'AND SPECIAL AGENCIES : ft4AfrnA/a- 3cRetR/ M,4ThRML5 ,w • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING TIG CITY OF IGARD Community Development S hoping A Better Community I, cPatricia L. Guns ord, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of ardWashington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) F. NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: 10N2002-00003/SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE I 11/18/2002 AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) El City of Tigard Planning Director 0 Tigard Hearings Officer ® Tigard Planning Commission 0 Tigard City Council • A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof, on November 25,2002,and deposited in the United States Mail on November 25,2002, postage prepaid. ir& • `erso. atI par-. Not ) STATE OF ocoN ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the // day of r, , 2002. OFFICIAL SEAL DIANE M JELDERKS NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION N0. E578 SEPT. r __'/\ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES S 07,2003 NO ART PUBLIC I i ' 60 My Commission 3 I ires: /7/0.3 1 • • . EXHIBIT__,_ =.0 T1 120 DAYS = 1/18/2003 CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO. 2002-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Case Numbers: ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2002-00003 Case Name: SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE Name of Owner: Knez Realty Group Name of Applicant: Yun S. Hong Address of Applicant: 17450 West Valley Hwy. Tukwila, WA 98188-5511 Address of Property: 8205 SW Hunziker Street Tigard, OR 97223 Tax Map/Lot Nos.: Washington County Tax Assessor's Map No. 2S101 BC, Tax Lot 200. A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A ZONE CHANGE. THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICANT'S PLANS, NARRATIVE, MATERIALS, COMMENTS OF REVIEWING AGENCIES, THE PLANNING DIVISION'S STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 18. 2002 (continued from 10/21 to 11/4 to 11/18) TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY REGARDING THIS APPLICATION. THIS DECISION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. Request: > The applicant is requesting approval to change the existing zone from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) in order to convert an old industrial building into a "SyKart Indoor Racing Center." Current Zoning Designation: I-L: Light Industrial District. Proposed Zoning Designation: I-P: Industrial Park District. Applicable Review Criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.530. Action: > © Approval as Requested ❑ Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to: © Owners of Record Within the Required Distance © Affected Government Agencies © The Affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator © The Applicants and Owners The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obtained from the Planning Division/Community Development Department at the City of Tigard City Hall. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON NOVEMBER 25, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON DECEMBER 12, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON DECEMBER 11, 2002. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. • • �y i. c,,x, »., ,s --'�Y � -- ` -� - .;n. - zx �.q - _sr er ,'��-�,.�€�_- $.; %�� �° - d"�'-- !%v X -��} M k 3""`Sa& TL � ":,>2 ht "w. x. h 'a„Ye��S 4 b� f : NOTICE OF �FINAL°�ORDER� NO. 2402 03 PC4 �: -e".->'°� .�:iT,,6,f: -);;,p;<,��.€ ,Jo 4: = -- mot .:, : , - �� . i 7 q4t s° BYwTHE{ PLfANNING RC.OMMISSION P IL r 41 s u �# v., x , -_.� , r x CIYY OF TGARD 4 '„� --•�.�.��r ,.�,3 �'�`t� -�'- Ag r--�" � � '��r � ::1:4 'N � ��f F"k 'F�. f;z ; -`y�1'4r"�,,. „�:z.�•�°.$� ,.£:... {--°° f v Y• w',4k `'fd-3 ra a :,,:(;:::'-:':::3';_ �_t_, ,,, 'eye, U:, a 4. .$(..irn iuu 6,f,aEnt =w n x E FOR'THE CITY OF tTIGARD,�OREGON v* ,f6A—i , " g,�' ' �3 r, - -�' ;#- <. ,t its - :',.i.fig-:f'`is�.a'k%;j':w'=:::..;` x' o�:'4 kk,+`3 ..,,l:'?..c :a x '-r_...-a.3.-, ,.. , ..,.; ..a.z.: ,,:§. ..'p'4'-d_z ]ivy.. +3r .• $iii:•:_I. -.i,t, a.-,°.�._' A FINAL ORDER APPROVING A LAND USE APPLICATION FOR A ZONE CHANGE. THE COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON THIS APPLICATION ON NOVEMBER 18, 2002. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS BASED THEIR DECISION ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. 120 DAYS = 1/18/2003 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE CASE NO.: Zone Change (ZON) ZON2002-00003 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval to change the existing zone from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) in order to convert an old industrial building into a "SyKart Indoor Racing Center." APPLICANT: Yun S. Hong OWNER: Knez Realty Group 17450 West Valley Hwy. 8185 SW Hunziker Street Tukwila, WA 98188-5511 Tigard, OR 97223-8229 LOCATION: 8205 SW Hunziker Street; WCTM 2S101 BC, Tax Lot 200. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses Including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and deveopment, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. Among other uses, indoor entertainment is allowed. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.530; and Comprehensive Plan Policies 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 12. NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO.2002-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 1 OF 10 • • SECTION II. PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION .� aP -- F'a• *"4"sL.. C�n✓ 'S f. .:Gsat"Si:':'L.- ,�.,ca - �a $f;> l' �"M.'� _.'.'f.��,Fy � ---.:v .y. a.- The Pla ping RCOmmission afinds that .the„Iproposed Zone,,hChange meets the applicable;; approval=c iteria of"the Trgand Community Developmer t Code�and that=the proposal will note adversely;=affect the, health, safety and welfare Nof the CI : Thec:Plannin g Commission; ; Aherefore z>APPROVES the requested Land Use Application x f� g a .. �';r - ....f;:vr`4t,”, .'�.a.- :: ---..i�- > v,.,c.:.._ - e"W a ar13".•, .. - :�c3.... .�. x. e .,..F :3.7.y.r';- SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History The property has been zoned for industrial uses for many years. The building located on the site was originally built in 1960 by Irvington-Moore, which used it to manufacture machinery for plywood mills until 1996, when Knez Realty Group LLC acquired it. It has been used since that time by Power Rents (for storing and repairing equipment) and Safeway Scaffolding, and is now used by Knez Building Materials to store sheet rock. The property was zoned M-3, Light Industrial, in August 1977. In 1982 the M-3 zone was revised, and renamed I-L. Certain uses, such as offices, were no longer allowed in the I-L zone. In 1988, the adjacent property, (2S101 BC-00201), was rezoned from I-L to I-P at the request of the property owner. The building on that parcel, built in 1973 under the classification of a "public utility", became a permitted office use under the I-P zone. In 1997, the 2-story office portion of the building located on the subject property was completely remodeled and upgraded by Power Rents. The upgrade included handicapped accessible restrooms on the ground floor under (BUP97-0319.) At that time, Mr. Knez constructed a handicapped accessible walkway from SW Hunziker. Vicinity Information I he subject property is bordered on the southwest by the 2-story office building mentioned above, zoned I-P and to the east and southwest by industrial buildings, zoned I-L. The area to the north of the property is zoned General Commercial (C-G) and is developed as a business park. There is a mix of industrial and office uses along SW Hunziker Street, zoned I-P and I-L. There are single-family detached homes on the west side of the property, zoned R-4.5, served by Knoll Drive. The closest home is approximately 250 feet from the building located on the subject property. Site Information And Proposal Description The applicant is requesting approval to change the existing zone from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) in order to convert an old industrial building into a "SyKart Indoor Racing Center." The proposed use will fit under the indoor entertainment use category which is allowed in the I-P zone and not within the I-L zone. With the abutting property to the south zoned I-P and properties across SW Hunziker zoned I-P, a campus-like setting Is established due to the extent that each of the surrounding properties have developed. The I-P zone still allows for light-industrial uses, however, it also allows for a wider range of uses, making the property more marketable. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.380 Chapter 18.380 states that a recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application for a quasi-judicial amendment shall be based on all of the following standards: NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO.2002-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 OF 10 • Demonstration of compliance with all applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designations. The applicable Comprehensive Plan Polices are as follows. In virtually all cases, the ' Comprehensive Plan treats the I-L and I-P zones interchangeably. 2. CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT: 2.1.1 The City shall maintain an ongoing citizen involvement program and shall assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process. On behalf of Mr. Hong, the applicant, Mr. Ed Murphy sent out notices to surrounding property owners and neighborhood representatives, posted a sign on the property, and held a neighborhood meeting on August 15, 2002 in accordance with the City of Tigard's neighborhood meeting notification process. According to the minutes of the neighborhood meeting, nine property owners were in attendance. No objections were given to the proposed zone change. The applicant discussed the proposed indoor racing use and the impacts that it would have on the area. Mr. Hong presented one of the go-karts that would be used with the business and started it up in order for the attendants to hear the level of noise that would be produced. Other items discussed were exterior lighting, hours of operation, loitering and storage of fuel for the go-karts. 3. NATURAL FEATURES AND OPEN SPACE: 3.1.1 The City shall not allow development in areas having the following development limitations except where it can be shown that established and proven engineering techniques related to a specific site plan will make the area suitable for the proposed development. (note: this policy does not apply to lands designated as significant wetlands on the floodplain and wetlands map.): a. Areas meeting the definition of wetlands under Chapter 1.26 of the community development code. b. Areas having a severe soil erosion potential; c. Areas subject to slumping, earth slides or movement; d. Areas having slopes in excess of 25%; or e. Areas having severe weak foundation soils. A very small area of the property along the northern property line contain wetlands. However, the building and parking area are pre-existing uses, and no expansion of either is planned. There will be no impact to the wetlands as a result of this zone change. The property,does not have any of the other development limitations listed above. Therefore, this policy has been satisfied. 5. ECONOMY: 5.1 The City shall promote activities aimed at the diversification of the economic opportunities available to Tigard residents with particular emphasis placed on the growth of the local job market. 5.4 The City shall ensure that new commercial and industrial development shall not encroach into residential areas that have not been designated for commercial or industrial uses. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES: 14. The City shall encourage the location and development of economic activities which meet the occupational and employment needs of all City residents, particularly the unemployed and underemployed. According to the applicant's narrative, The proposed use itself will employ about five people. NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO.2002-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 3 OF 10 • • This is not a large amount of employment, but it is more than are employed for the current use, which is warehousing sheet rock. In addition, there are positive economic benefits from the proposed indoor racing facility, particularly to lodging and restaurant businesses in the area. The facility is located close to downtown Tigard. The proposed use is not new development, the use will occur entirely within an existing building. However, the proposed I-P zone will offer better protection to the neighborhood from potential future uses than the I-L.zone currently does. Therefore, Policies 5.1 and 5.4 have been satisfied. 7. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES: 7.1.2 The City shall require as a pre-condition to development approval that; a. Development coincide with the availability of adequate service capacity including: 1. Public water; 2. Public sewer shall be required for new development within the city unless the property involved in over 300 feet from a sewer line and Washington County Health Department approval for a private disposal system is obtained; and 3. Storm drainage. b. The facilities are: 1. Capable of adequately serving all intervening properties and the proposed development; and 2. Designed to city standards. c. All new development utilities to be placed underground. The existing building is already connected to public water, public sewer and public storm drainage, all of which have adequate service capacity. Therefore, Policy 7.1.2 has been met. 8. TRANSPORTATION: 8.1.1 Plan, design and construct transportation facilities in a manner which enhances the livability of Tigard by: a. Proper location and design of transportation facilities. b. Encouraging pedestrian accessibility by providing safe, secure and desirable pedestrian routes. c. Addressing issues of excessive speeding and through traffic on local residential streets through a neighborhood traffic program. The program should address corrective measures for existing problems and asure that development incorporates traffic calming. 8.1.2 Provide a balanced transportation system, incorporating all modes of transportation (including motor vehicle, bicycle, pedestrian, transit and other modes) by: a. The development of and implementation of public street standards that recognize the multi-purpose nature of the street right-of-way for utility, pedestrian, bicycle, transit, truck and auto use. b. Coordination with Tri-met, and/or any other transit providers serving Tigard, to improve transit service to Tigard. Fixed route transit will primarily use arterial and collector streets in Tigard. Development adjacent to transit routes will provide direct pedestrian accessibility. c. Construction of bicycle lanes on all arterials and collectors within Tigard consistent with the bicycle master. All schools, parks, public facilities and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a bikeway. NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO.2002-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 4 OF 10 • • d. Construction of sidewalks on all streets within Tigard. All schools, parks, public facilities and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a sidewalk. e. Development of bicycle and pedestrian plans which link to recreational trails. f. Design local streets to encourage a reduction in trip length by providing connectivity and limiting out-of-direction travel and provide connectivity to activity centers and destinations with a priority for bicycle and pedestrian connections. g. Tigard will participate in vehicle trip reduction strategies developed regionally targeted to achieve non-single occupant vehicle levels outlined in Table 1.3 of the Regional Transportation Plan. h. Tigard will support the development of a commuter rail system as part of the regional transit network. 8.1.4 Set and maintain transportation performance measures that: a. Set a minimum intersection level of service standard for the City of Tigard and requires all public facilities to be designed to meet this standard. b. Set parking ratios to provide adequate parking, while providing an incentive to limit the use of the single occupant vehicle. c. Encourage working with other transportation providers in Washington County, including Tri-Met, Metro and ODOT to develop, operate and maintain intelligent transportation systems, including coordination of traffic. The subject property has an existing driveway onto SW Hunziker. The City may require additional dedication of land to meet current street right-of-way requirements for a "regional access bikeway", in order to accommodate bicycle traffic. However, the dedication of right- of-way will be addressed under Site Development Review. The proposed use may generate transit ridership. The Tri-Met bus stop or the #38 and #78 bus lines are located on Hunziker Street, directly in front of the site. The applicant will work with Tri-Met to make any reasonable pedestrian or transit-oriented improvements that will encourage transit ridership. The project will meet the requirements of Section 18.810 of the Tigard Development Code regarding transit facilities. The Site Plan will also be reviewed by Tn-Met as part of the Site Development review application. All on-site parking and circulation will be done to City specifications, although a variance or adjustment will be sought, if necessary, to reduce the amount of parking from the 4.3 spaces/1000 square feet of building space required by the Tigard Development Code for indoor recreation. 9. ENERGY: 9.1.3 The City shall encourage land use development which emphasizes sound energy conservation, design and construction. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 8. The City shall coordinate with and support public and private planning efforts that advocate alternative forms of transportation such as mass transit, carpooling, ride share, bicycling and walking for commuter purposes. Customers may walk to the indoor racing facility, bicycle, car-pool, take a bus, come with a group in a van or bus, or drive their own vehicle. There are several available modes of transportation by which customers can get to and from the facility. Therefore, the application complies with Policy 9.1.3. NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO.2002-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 5 OF 10 • • 12. LOCATIONAL CRITERIA: 12.3 INDUSTRIAL. The intent of the industrial land use designation is to: 1. Provide for the designation of suitable lands for industrial use; 2. Provide for economic growth and development; 3. Protect existing and potential lands suitable for industrial development from encroachment by non-industrial or incompatible uses; 4. Provide land for industrial use by type to minimize the impact on surrounding development; and 5. Take advantage of existing transportation facilities. Industrial lands are classified as: Heavy industrial lands are areas intended to provide for manufacturing, • processing and assembling activities. Uses within this classification are characterized by large buildings and large storage areas and as having associated external effects such as smoke, noise, odor or visual pollution. Light industrial lands are areas intended to provide for manufacturing, processing, assembling and related office activities. Uses within this classification are of a size and scale which makes them generally compatible with other non-industrial uses and which have no off-site effects. The subject site is adjacent to a residential zone and a two-story office building located in an I-P zone. The use that has been proposed to occupy the subject site if the zone change is approved will go through the City's Site Development Review process, where off-site effects will be addressed and conditions will be imposed to ensure that there are no off-site effects. The land use map designates specific areas of the city for industrial development. Over time, however, there may be a demand for new sites. Therefore, the following policy will apply in making such decisions. 12.3.1 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE THAT: a. Sites for heavy industrial development shall be: (1) Separated by topography established buffers, transportation or other non-residential land uses from residentially developed areas. (2) Located in areas having rail service, arterial or major collector access. b. Sites for light industrial development shall be: (1) Buffered from residential areas to ensure that privacy and the residential character of the area are preserved. (2) Located on an arterial or collector street and that industrial traffic shall not be channeled through residential areas. c. The site shall be of a size and shape which will provide for the short and log • range needs of the use. d. The land intended for development shall have an average site topography of less than 6% grade, or that it can be demonstrated that through engineering techniques all limitations to development and the provision of services can be mitigated. e. It can be demonstrated that associated lights, noise and other external effects will not interfere with the activities and uses on surrounding properties. f. All other applicable plan policies can be met. • NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO.2002-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 6 OF 10 . • • IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. Industrial development adjacent to existing or planned residential areas shall be conditioned to ensure that: a. The specific proposed use will be compatible with adjacent uses; b. The design of the facility and its site will not place visual or physical burdens on the surrounding areas; c. The operational characteristics of the facility will be compatible with surrounding uses and include[s] consideration of; 1 Delivery and shipping characteristics; 2 Hours of operation; 3 Noise; 4 Lighting; and 5 Other use characteristics. The subject property, because it is adjacent to an R-4.5 zone, and abuts another I-P zoned property, would be more appropriately zoned I-P than I-L. The proposed site improvements will ensure that the adjacent residential area is not adversely impacted with light, noise or other external effects. The applicant proposes and will be conditioned under Site Development Review to shroud all external lights to eliminate glare from adjacent properties. The applicant will also be required to show that the proposed use for the subject property (indoor go-kart racing) will not exceed applicable noise levels. According to the applicant, all activities will take place indoors, the go-karts are equipped with catalytic converters and mufflers, and are not full size racecars. The doors on the west side that abut the R-4.5 zone will not be left open during operation of the go-karts. The fans for the building will all be on the east side of the existing building. • The I-P zoning district requires that 25 percent of all sites to be developed be landscaped and all industrial uses that abut residential zones have a minimum buffer equal to 25 feet, which includes a minimum of trees, berms and shrubs. Currently there is approximately 32 1/2 feet between the existing building on the subject site and the abutting residential zone to the west. Therefore, the applicant will be required at Site Development Review to comply as closely to the required standards as possible. Possible conditions may include closing off west side of the subject building to all traffic. Creation of outdoor open space on the west side of the building to meet buffering standards and the campus like setting which is the intent of the I-P zoning district may also be feasible. The applicant has mentioned in pre-application meetings that a variance to parking will most likely be applied for to reduce the number of required parking. Therefore, more square footage would be available for landscaping and creative ideas to lessen the impact of the proposed and future uses for the property. 18.380.030.B.2 Demonstration of compliance with all applicable standards of any provision of this code or other applicable implementing ordinance; and The proposed SyKart Indoor Racing Center would be within an old industrial building, which was built many years prior to the adoption of the current development standards. No expansion of the building or the site will be proposed, nor any additional paving. The building meets the maximum height restrictions, and the maximum site coverage. The parking lot is landscaped with existing trees, and the building has direct pedestrian access from Hunziker Street to the front door of the building. Hunziker Street is fully improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk. The applicant has submitted a traffic study with the narrative. NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO.2002-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 7 OF 10 • • While it may not be feasible to meet all of the current standards of the Development Code, due to the non-conformity of the existing structure, it will be possible to bring the site closer to conformance with those standards. Further, if the site redevelops entirely, or new development is added on the north end of the parcel, through Site Development Review, that new development will be better able to meet all of the current standards of the I-P zone. 18.380.030.B.3 Evidence of change in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to the property which is the subject of the development application. Typically, a lighter industrial zone borders a residential zone. From reviewing the City of Tigard's zoning map, it is clear that this is the case. For instance, the residential neighborhood at the south end of SW Hunziker Street, served by SW Fir and Varns Streets, is zoned R-4.5 and is surrounded by I-P and C-P (Commercial Professional) zones. Similarly, the I-P zone has been applied along SW Tigard Street, which also abuts a residential neighborhood zoned R-4.5. The same situation exists along SW Durham Road, where the residentially zoned properties on the north side of SW Durham Road where the residentially zoned properties on the north side of SW Durham Road abut I-P zoning on the south side of SW Durham Road. In fact, the only other place where I-L zoning abuts a residential zone is just south of the railroad tracks, east of the Senior Center. In this area, the residential neighborhoods are separated from the industrial uses by a wide wetland and floodplain buffer. The only place in the City where R-4.5 zoning abuts I-L zoning where the actual uses are not physically separated by wetlands and/or floodplains, is the subject site. The subject property was most likely originally zoned industrial because an industrial building was already there. The M-3 zone, applied in 1977, was also most likely applied based on the existing use, warehouse, as was the case in 1982, when the I-L zone was established. Had the property been vacant, or had it been used for an office building, like the property adjacent to the south, it most likely would have been zoned I-P. This is evident from reading the staff report and Planning Commission minutes from the zone change of 1988 which was a request to change the property to the south (2S101 BC-00201) of the subject site (2S101 BC-00200) from an I-L zoning designation to an I-P designation. That is, a lighter I-P zone should have been originally applied next to the R-4.5 zone, and most likely would have been, had it not been for the existing use (warehouse). If the subject property was already zoned I-P, and an application asked for a zone change to I-L an argument against the hypothetical zone change would likely be that it is adjacent to R-4.5 and single-family neighborhood, and, therefore, would not be the appropriate zone. I-P is a "lighter" zone. The types of uses allowed and prohibited are more compatible with a residential area than the types of uses allowed in the I-L zoning district. Considering the purpose statement of the industrial zoning district, it states "The location of land within each industrial district must be carefully selected, and design and development standards created to minimize the potential adverse impacts of industrial activity on established residential areas." The zoning map is therefore inconsistent in the zoning of this property. Based on the zoning patterns in other areas of the City, the location of land was not carefully selected in this case, as the property should have been zoned I-P to limit the industrial activity on established residential areas. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the standards outlined in Section 18.380 have been addressed and satisfied. NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO.2002-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 8 OF 10 • • SECTION V. ADDITIONAL STAFF AND OUTSIDE AGENCY COMMENTS City of Tigard Operations Manager/Water Department have reviewed this proposal and offered no comments or objections City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and offered no comments or objections. City of Tigard Long Range Planning Department has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: • General objection to changing the zone to one that allows more non-industrial uses. Any industrial land in Tigard is in short supply, especially for truly industrial uses that requires the I-L zone and are not permitted in I-P zones. City of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: • My comments will be limited to the impacts on the transportation system. There will be no adverse impacts on any other public facility. CTS Engineers, Inc. submitted a report dated September 9, 2002. The overall purpose of the report was to identify the intersections in the vicinity of this site that may be impacted by this zone change, compare the existing Levels of Service (LOS) during the PM Peak Hour with a variety of scenarios: 1) Maximum build-out under the current I-L zone, 2) maximum build-out under the proposed I-P zone, and 3) build-out per the proposed Sykart Indoor Racing Center (SIRC). The CTS report identified the following intersections as the most critical for analysis: • Hall Boulevard/Scofjins Street/Hunziker Street (signalized) • Hunziker Street/72n Avenue (signalized) • Hunziker Street/Site Driveway (unsignalized). Staff concurred with the selection of critical intersections. CTS determined that the current LOS for the three intersections during the weekday PM Peak Period are as follows: • Hall Boulevard/Scogins Street/Hunziker Street: LOS C • Hunziker Street/72" Avenue: LOS C • Hunziker Street/Site Driveway: LOS B CTS then performed a comparison of the three scenarios mentioned above. For the worst case full build-out in the I-L zone, they used the Light Industrial category (ITE 110). For the worst case full build-out in the I-P zone, they used the General Office category (ITE 710). For the Sykart scenario, they used actual driveway count data obtained from other Sykart facilities in the state of Washington. The following is a comparison of the PM Peak Hour trip generation that could be experienced from the subject site, assuming a 70,000 sf facility (current building size): • I-L Zone, Light Industrial: 69 PM Peak trips • I-P Zone, General Office: 104 PM Peak trips • Sykart Project: 20 PM Peak trips. It can easily be seen that the Sykart project will not generate a significant amount of trips during the PM Peak period. However, it is still important to compare the worst case scenarios of the two zones. NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO.2002-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 9 OF 10 • • CTS then compared the expected LOS (Weekday PM Peak) for the critical intersections, based on the worst case trip generations mentioned above. The following is a summary of their findings: Intersection LOS (I-L) LOS (I-P) LOS (Svkart) Hail/Scoffins/Hunziker C C C Hunziker/72nd D D C Hunziker/Site Driveway C C B Based on that comparison, there would be no additional impact to the estimated LOS of the critical intersections by rezoning this site to I-P. To further bolster that opinion, it is interesting to compare the volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratios of the two signalized intersections under the same scenarios. When V/C approaches 1.0, a given intersection is near failing. Below is a comparison of the V/C ratios: Intersection V/C (I-L) V/C (I-P) V/C (Sykart) Hall/Scoffins/Hunziker 0.79 0.80 0.79 Hunziker/72nd 0.86 0.87 0.85 Again, there is no significant change to the critical intersections as a result of the rezoning. Based on the information above, I would support the proposed zone change. • SECTION VI. CONCLUSION It is further ordered that the applicant and the parties to these proceedings be notified of the entry of this order. PASSED: This 18th day of November, 2002 by the City of Tigard Planning Commission. U —Y G-e-)1441. Judith Anderson, Planning Commission Chair i:\curpin\mathew\zon\zon2002-00003 Staff Report.FINALORDER NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO.2002-03 PC BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 10 OF 10 CITY of TIGARD V) C OE00 RAPNIC INFORMATION SYSTEM ir •iv ITA ''''— VICINITY MAP \ gN, ' C. * � 10N2002-00003 I. 414 - SYKART INDOOR RACING 4 • , ZONE CHANGE V. ■I. 4) il phir ♦ 1ti a 1 F _Cei,4 '').4 C44.'r \("Pc-,4. • 1 1�1 1-....J'�..... , ::Q 7''42, aONITA�• U., _,,,, ...._ .,,4 #.$' \ acdtee;"°�•,amr{p�� T F9, w .4, il' Tigard Area Map / .QP F N c T ti � 11,4, litS",>11r,* y illoi 0 400 800 Feet\P14 . V=500 feet ;City of Tigard' Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. F---' 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 (503)6394171 I \ http:/Avww.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Sep 20,2002;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR «-... _- ■� °���:Illllrgwa�.,.::PI1�:: :►w tard•i �. ml�m i °rO _■ 11 11 r♦ ►•�� MN M� gl"`'/t,'b • �7��'■�//�1�ipp:Rni �,°`� pig;, t►• �. la._„I i 1\',m.�C /-\ i• 'I urr ",/■_-11■■I' ♦'••MIL ,1'1;12 f :� .:pig; �= •• �1 IIIIII_IIIIIII 1 •- I ' ��11.d► �b -r rs . v.� /' a+- Qi l 1 U .1. �• 1 �:..Vnrn ` ���/ tom- ► II 5 1IIh'$. ■: `v= �u�m�m=ELT ^ ill = W m+.. -/�.r.;m'■ • a► �►, �� ..- ,.._..:,,,.z. 1 III I-III- il III ' Y V 41111 "Pinviraj.....41.17,:_. , ..r 11111114 i Wil ;ra;22.....in........ ►iw• ��: ' i..`■i� \' ♦♦�■1 un���. ,� Ji• .1 , n. _ .....II • ■ • .•- 11 m ��....,43...-7.....1.1: �� �_.� y } "" Ili (f: .la I�. W � ■ ' IQ{®rJ ��GI®a 1p�® ®' '`^ ,; III `'� ` .• G - .'�;OI�®,. Y.■.r■..�-d.tlq°Ii�:!�C r �.. LE.� ` _ .I ;3 , :. 1m�, . Saf �■ O Z bill �m tw' tt. .w 'ii"ww��_•1.�...• .. '°ate ®.�/� '•? r9 ':;,1. .' •^I O 0■amen�mm ......2.121"/�emgl_math/ \ .sr .� I 7., iim-or tl,�a.mo }.� I J ;R....,. ,:. , s�I�N `�... . g,,�7 1 �,.s r '�l a ; "! ''�..Y m.7e'1 '1!116 i_ �' Iflgi11�--c. ':r1Li ®® �_i! � � '\`"� " j,� t 4 I t �. N rl _� a �`�q'- , (®�®� ®W � ':1 r (III mop ,r, IAemi ,q.'q W ,•J`� -.-.., t,,,,'- '9:,1'n.'n^• i S V eB _11_,_111_111`1 g��1: ' 1■M� .e11�71 111 • ;g, , �.,v Yi2tt I �.'. S Z ct loft �si-- 1:.'r:•%j11J p7Raea4 ,p,•.m _ Q if1J lQ'ipl ® i ggo��,,,,w�►..;� ,1'""'iVHafi., , 4 1,�./'r '`--I4.it' �45r�t•.;�,,i%r . O n>. ...�.es z', I t6•�=.iri _y:. W 'gib`' ' w liar a°� .,. .\A`, ® 9 OfiJ/10° ' �'f�„°� 1�_�_'®o limas e r - G iin g"":; nee ■a 1Vi/T14 ,ji ' .46��• i ;c9;r ' �t`.�e o.11∎1►11 1171 ti ® -----417.:4.•■.i'!1:. 11 Kb_, ��\ ''c� �yr►iP,� �Ia�H®161I.PS _..� •°:�' ,..(:.; ;%'_8 /�i1�!?la_= :a X17® ✓�N �_ C i CIC '1� -a q�g '6..'"1.11° ®110n�1m®`,.,� :i '%FM:i1?s G x.41 y vE1/a tF?71�rr a.^SF':�h® _ r _ LI Urns U 0 ellr Im1E.1m , + ,`• •,aQ'•tC!e�;ajtfil",R` i.. ;,�:3"'' Ski ia�f.'Viur' �Qf�l �m�= '® 4111 ,1111411-� �.Milli.11 '�1 0111�Cti1mt �.� 1 ;i�f;, - dt '"t 1 v.'r.L,. pE4&•..b° mi��la_ ■ . •■.tr' u. .mi,2i, rh , x Idit k§ l.. 11 QIQ7.• 1_ _r!^ :3�,�■Pi��ilil C m' 1 ! '.:. „.n. ,zMr r la a,v:• tl./ If�ltl�7® 11 �F= ,11� /Ot►►♦ ' a tl■Mtltltl .rluifi+t ti's' �i'.�i�,1 rc:t:,, ,,14,f aj,\ , Ic riP1+oa ♦, ®. 7F'..'' .ri�t.;S j��(::. ':iu}'•h:;'e"' ,d'' 8t, . /•v44 km11.11y�iV• ., p/e:+;�iRl9�-. ayy'' 1 �1611�■�- ��i�•!\_._..Aini{.:1�-, ,} �,,� 1�♦•• \, 1� Ip �/�.. ® Z 40 � '•Y len;:;,;^,,I ,,,. .,.G_• !; ,t,0',4,W h'`'t'.,�a; -`!.+•.all ,r. `Al REF. c 7@`4Tmla P ♦♦ ..m tl0■tll■ �A ..IF't. y {L ,¢. :r 4iirnv �II�{•r1(, a-� 11� �.,, wgC:1 iMi���{ii�ll_I?in` q♦ , aa� �. .. .. � laoNr 4 0 Illw yy "aGa "�.• :0! q.. ':>t,: :�,t .•'�,•,�j��!? a�..,,,'.gg�3C... IT- �R, a 1� � - - ♦P r . p�,, 1 ,4 ?•' ^ ' !.14. ;.�,1, O'Y k,44.1,r i, .:. i-lia�l n. ' :Im ■: 'I11° Igli In*�°Ill,.•l �lir us I /10Im�. CA u/.xu J '� q ,,,.. .' y4. ,,,,,,,, ji :4,..,i' 41..., .1? .. a..isiuii l.e;10,HW 1. 111! ?Ala = 411.4#'° a 0 CC ..UU,: �Uf, _ r•`I , . ®/p. � �@,. , '',.;_,;. y'., n.<.v.;,p; 1=t_4,„..,:;.11....t_la, gnl a 9iLlatlli �n_1:=_-1r LI : °j ��`�.� � iJ?!L:• ,, +�' I �m-r! ___itl-:N�.1=169°� +1. /` =\71I- ♦�' � O ^ 'ipi A ,t► m•Ia. /�. n'+±y:. � �j:.1'r h.al-lilt; unml 4.41;:: V"' •1 �$ /� _�1�- J �'' L'' r" ,'(JR' tai . .;ey ' i it ..e.r �^- „ g"....„,,,,;„4,,,,,,,,,,.ds.. ` } r.,�;F' i-a¢�s��- i�IIIW1:'�'S.0 i.ut ai•1 �iriiiilpp�cr• loi�. ® U . '" 411111. `.9�ult_, ®�I�l�► .. ^ _ ?;;li :,40..' �.l all _- I s_'iv „ •/ _ a:`s r mlla.111 Il� I'Hig.I liiiEli Q!i- 19,11 r y X00 ♦ ��`��ei �11� --10■}� �I,,.i:;dm�tall:.� ��a.n.1 a0�', ,'..ia� q ::; :v�S A"� �•�, 0.l■ �■.�I►"'II.p�N ..5�.°.'w\. ► .�i�..•�:Cl:f''i+ i)1 - ,w .1�1i.1.r ✓\� , �� I�����pp��•d1Q 10 -/.i■1w17a,1•• -M■.i. ���; {/� 'a�.m•Q• �Wto 5� 4+�► �� Ira ■�YSdty IIy�9■,,1 y!i6■ 'a.n� ' s _.m:a. y "'1 1 { :ME ro y■.I 17.;t}, + r w ''i;..+... ■ ®1111"'''-11 m1II�► 4/� ♦ ♦ �- d T.ih11'°a - w ', - a .ri.'. :If t.:-.t. ,tg :oWlll! fi:;h'.bi •�•iu.:'wI1 (. fIO♦ .���wn ∎ o n• .,Y\e.. «n O ••,.•n.::u! f,, „aim ii.• . - :: : .11� a:r,•�._ - �♦� 1- p":��1"•�mr `died. k- ,♦♦.ar , :,. „ 43:•b-h..F. -, caWr 71!r/i-r _•�::i:�'.:.:P` Or■\1r.a q,i d1 . 110 a.r..■o�0�-, ./'�� /lu.n•I•ttlta®°. .mmxmmm ,.......c„.:•. L�nni.uru .nw. ..._ �:' T■.*i°`::i':( _ ;«Mi':v:'r.-:�`y' �A •-�- - u »: ,Al •::.,•,: 1 c ®ma raa.mlm�adai■4"., B°• .tal■...d■- i;r,»,; c�c :',; : ', 10 a- ��IIR/1a9, � '9,,� ' ./'♦/ `'�• � ` {7 I wea � an ••� __.q t..a. :'";`., i:d';:�sa;:. q t ■ .►.,%• 1 r" ♦: ." ® ' I.am l► +.°8,aa.a■■ r- C►��.I • ,,,''� , N•••r 4:==`� ® -.N.142.-amma■�t. �m w■s. f- " Ruuu•"`r I 1-tI ,,.ol ::.,z,.,-: :;F (� N; sit trill-1.111;y r. d'�1�A 1 ' us �;-ta lit-1aia� ,.•. +1.a.liaaa■la i►►t►sw :I J,,.uu�..� y..p1.: t" •rma■.1. I/-/ .i: ;:}ti� :���� '.L�mt..0if.aLd■■ r °w';'sf�;.�,,:i3'• - IIIIIIIIIIIIIII Il��.��4���i:. Ii'I7I==�i i'.�.` ... :,.. t : 7 _...-. 1r� ar0/ a'" O,r mR amntf infn;r,:c; 1 /;\•yam•. =gra a ''�tl •M 0 .7 r a b. 1 I P; _ . >: .AI Inm rrir .: �'m'- �a■ '3:::::);p u •■•s■1I■ p■.. . ♦• `' ,i, �. � IQ■IIQ1A' 1r:rr:�` `1"� r e. T egit�■mm.Im11i�E m.�I� ��.: ♦- ;�( r�r. +.♦♦.I1�II.mom.lf� 7a+m-wig ■ !:: X1111=�uu.�/� h-- e Rte. O �,y •� +► ♦�V Pm ■mma((.�1µ�pq �.. r.v 1'.. - .�' - ..�- f� :pop'.'+` 1--_1171,:al.-.•- ■ 1: %4 �, \ p�,:,. ♦ ♦ ♦1 • 7H�.n11 a��'''' _ I���.F�7� � _ L:r t i 0° ,,: '; N p �V ,Gl7i:�1`s1' �a'a•�w• ♦��.r✓/♦�m tm■. a ... JAw,�� 11.1:@I ; - .. J� = t:�„ y,♦♦ .I 'r'°I ����-w�e' r r �� r1+ .I •• •� _ .►rlg. • 1 1:_ . 1 ,� t •.+...+\o-1t� � Q .In v... ® ♦q+►pJ ♦i•lrr�q '�•�� ►e1•es �',m 9>�i9■!mY!��- •.4,C•.�,^ ti`, �/ �"_♦. W 5 CIImm1 aa. alll 1 r \ ` •, s t♦♦- oNfi w ®■- ®� 'dll r 1•�••q����1.r 1. N :.��A .111 ® `�, r '• rj♦♦♦ a �0�� 1gI�1!Imo i.fi ��m/IIIr,.Vw11. ,,,/O' '4J���� a■1.+`_ O •,`mlrim//.-11 :•1 11 '• °r ` N'/. ®O, �ce s��10 41"233 n.,, 101';q�10S�..rn1�, "` % �6i11�1�.�:.�►\-- 1 �i II �•/ 4 `mot 4AO A I�I/�Ap d r.r..-•�����- tld0i■OdddQ1►..1.7'I t a• ur /e .� . / I ��.®0 B • .. �® `C ♦ �a.c• mli am 1111 111 ^ I loi D+ 1 ;�� `�i a6 +'17 / ♦ +m ai r`�p O OOht.r�.0®'mml so.a®al 1 �� �m V.., :O .lioiij♦� P ► II: I1 / �Of♦ ♦ ® ais:nalff".mi1.10m1m p�® o IIi►+� '- 1111■®� Illir Cr•►" �+ +� �s.li'r '.. �,.,O 41, rte,.•0„..,,,,;;,` ,,fie`.-.•,t s...: 1.rsm"' : -C.1 I Ian m. . `�R o N QQ�1^taai■1■��► 1 ®� �� q ♦ow0♦ %��. Ii P ®�� � s���I'•• ���malmm em'°Q8a c:l°B®� tlm.ad.�l I.a1�11n'_D���n / •t I. • ®1im7®®@i0iil® ■n.. i ��l -1 z s® 4♦®� �� I/ OB 0„• o f a�l�®ro__®, tl.■/H11tlll>•••i.. e \ .°•.i�_IL' f1�,1111AV :•►if1� -L \'^I I"1 r n01 g d--® _ ,��.♦ IOa�IO ����/ •���r��.►►ii�J♦.n.an77m.. N ` . . • O.O B �,�m, .o a►�e•;,q mmrar -" al YIl RiL �LIIIr"rW Iln: ...y.,♦,-r y_:117.C172 ��a 11:11x. AVL�••►•.e„♦ 0/• , \ �.�.. +e►+•��sn wf■1 Eli tilt E Mimi ®O®! :c " 1-.. Ir,®Dn•+"....♦i G U o �, 0 rl �� ♦ °♦r p 40,41177';','":1'41':',1;';',4 m�anem Ild>d!amo ■° ��iD W o A�i.`n..u•� �i..�- I `�_1.p•�`� f ` 1 N MI r- ♦ p �1 Mall g� Al i.. \..III► .r..r. I ♦I 4!�� ..'`..`�Q �� [�;'"Sp;,'z,y".":-, ea Z"bill-Wm y_ ■ 'Q■!■■1®.ddl m�•.Im•' � 7 °■•Up•o r...r� 6�; � I • !■"' i ♦ ♦ 4 ► ofIe' .. ° 1 I_ . Ilan a I■. Ir-'� .- V1.71■'t, r %di�.�''y, gam.: a..im � ' m ru�a+m I. • • EXHIBIT____ Yun S. Hong ZON2002-00003 17450 West Valley Hwy. SYKART INDOOR RACING ZONE CHANGE Tukwila, WA 98188-5511 Ed Murphy & Associates 9875 SW Murdock Street Tigard, OR 97224 Knez Realty Group 8185 SW Hunziker Street Tigard, OR 97223-8229 Yun S. Hong 18035 14th NW Shorline, WA 98177 Luke Vasquez 7012 Linden Avenue N. Seattle, WA 98103 , • TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF TIGARD OREGON NOTICE: PEOPLE WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST PRINT THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS ON THIS SHEET. AGENDA ITEM#: Page( of DATE OF HEARING: // /0-/ D 2 CASE NUMBER(S): Z 0/V o? - 0000 3 OWNER/APPLICANT: // ' _A , i / CIO)IA , i LOCATION: g-Lc:, O 5 S i /474// PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME, ADDRESS, AND ZIP CODE PROPONENT (For the proposal) OPPONENT (Against the proposal) (Print�Naa�me/Address/Zip&Affiliation) (Print Name/AddressTZip&Affiliation) Name: 1cJ 1 V 1 % ( v'fix 4 Name: Address: CIS 7 S .S-k) N, U✓a O.0 k S Address: City: ( f\eiall.a State: OR_ Zip: 97 224 City: State: Zip: Name: 4A/ - !/v/V "7 Name: Address: 4P01/433;; /1 X . /V W• Address: City:s,i)ga/!I/�State: GO-- - Zip: ,(1)/"/7 City: State: Zip: Name:16( le Name: Address: /z.L-/rid-(t2 //7/e il/( Address: City:, L State:L'dl Zip: ?09_3 City: State: Zip: Name: Name: Address: Address: City: State: Zip: City: State: Zip: Name: Name: Address: Address: City: State: Zip: City: State: Zip: • • �Y AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OFTIGARD Community cDevetopment Shaping Better Community I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of rl"zgarccr, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) ® NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: 10N2002-00003/SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE (10/21/2002) File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanng) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer Z Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked EXhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked EXhibit'B", and by reference made a part hereof, on September 30,2002, and deposited in the United States Mail on September 30,2002, postage prepaid. • J./ - AIWA' / (P-1.7-in that lTred Notice s7ATE, of okEcoN ) County(4f Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the ( day of pi,►7v"-- , 2002. OFFICIAL SEAL �� DIANE M JELDERKS NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON - ' COMMISSION NO.326578 �,MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 NOT£' h1 >h1 BY PUBLIC OF OHL 1 MY Commission Expires: 0/93 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDDE VENDOR OR SELLER: • N� �T 0 R, THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. CITY OF TIGARD Community Devetpment Shaping A Better Community PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION,AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 21, 2002 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO.: ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2002-00003 FILE TITLE: SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE APPLICANT: Yun S. Hong OWNER: Knez Realty Group 17450 West Valley Hwy. 8185 SW Hunziker Street Tukwila, WA 98188-5511 Tigard, OR 97223-8229 APPLICANT'S Ed Murphy &Associates REP.: 9875 SW Murdock Street Tigard, OR 97224 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to change the existing zone from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) in order to convert an old industrial building into a "SyKart Indoor Racing Center." LOCATION: 8205 SW Hunziker Street; WCTM 2S101 BC, Tax Lot 200. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.530. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE.WISHING TO PRESENT A"TEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPO. ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE OR DOCUMENTS LESS THAN 7 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE, THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY MAY ALLOW A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING, SUBJECT TO ORS 215.428 OR 227.178. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL BE BASED UPON THE CRITERIA LISTED OR OTHER CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH THE PERSON BELIEVES TO APPLY TO THE DECISION. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR THE DEVELOPMENT CODE. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST, ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25 ) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MATHEW SCHEIDEGGER AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. iis- --'-- Q__------ ----- - CITY of TIGARD 1 - - 7f1 I ' ■ $ ■ IP Alli" 1. 19 , ,A VICINITY MAP fl l '= 1ON2002-00003' '�. . SYKART INDOOR RACING II: , ♦ itla ZONE CHANGE b* 25 •.# . ,jk trzir 1 %.4 _,' .. win., i , A . img, ,■;.V6 •T _b.?..._ ....1,,. I -—- 7,-°4•A' ' VV.. • : , *. ' \ i sal „___ 3. R ' '-. I 111 f'..'-!:* ,cSi w \ ii,-\■11111 ! ,.. ■ 4 „pi, %- * ., ,,..„, 'CityofTigard .....m.,�,........, n.. 3l CN.NOM I�—I Im,�HTm .....w40p.0.s.m • EXHIP 3 2S 101 BC-02100 2S 101 BC-01900 ANNAND JOHN D II&EDNA N DELAO ALICIA& 8260 SW HUNZIKER RD DELAO SANTA CECILIA& TIGARD,OR 97223 GARCIA ERNESTO 8335 SW HUNZIKER RD TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 BC-01800 2S 101 BD-00301 BEAUDOIN MICHAEL E& EAST SIDE VAN&STORAGE INC DONNA R 4836 SE POWELL BLVD 12490 SW KNOLL DR PORTLAND,OR 97206 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 BB-01500 2S101 BC-02200 CALWEST INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS LLC HHO&B ASSOCIATES LLC BY DELOITTE&TOUCHE LLP BY H&A CONSTRUCTION CO 2235 FARADAY AVE STE 0 PO BOX 23755 CARLSBAD,CA 92008 TIGARD,OR 97281 .364 01e5et49E 2S101BC-02501 4E6T IAIIU 1STRIAI unl IILICI t C HUTTIG INC Y'NG t I P 14500 SOUTH OUTER 40 RD 2 0 CHESTERFIELD,MO 63017 8 2S101 BC-00400 2S 101 BC-00500 CARASOF ALEX S&LILIYA V KIM KYONG SUK 12330 SW KNOLL DR 12300 SW KNOLL DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 BC-01000 2S 101 BC-02401 CLICKENER ROBERT R&PATRICIA A KING JAMES F 13855 SW PACIFIC HWY 12650 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 .21.4913G00571 2S101BC-02700 KING JAMES F Y PO BOX 23819 TIGARD,OR 97223 x4sisel7 90b 2S101 BC-03300 KISH ROBERT J/SUSAN C 7510 SW ASHFORD ST TIGARD,OR 97224 25101 BC-01600 2S101 BC-00100 DALTON LOIS KNEZ JOHN S SR&JEANNE M 12420 SW KNOLL DR 8185 SW HUNZIKER RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 BC-01700 2S 1 O1 BC-00200 DEFOE JUDITH A MCGEE& KNEZ REALTY GROUP LLC DEFOE CHARLES E JR 8185 SW HUNZIKER ST STE A 12455 SW 68Th AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 • • �S�rtuzr 4�r11 2S101BC-03000 K. r744EAL TY CRO T'I•C ROBERTS DAVID 12361 SW KNOLL DR T4GARerel TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101 BC-02202 2S101 BC-02800 LEACH DOUGLAS SEVERSON JAMES A&ROBIN 0 8430 SW HUNZIKER RD STE 200 29404 SW HEATER RD PORTLAND,OR 97223 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 25101 BC-02300 2S10100-00700 MCCARTHY KELLY E&JANICE L SMITH GERIG WESTERN PROPERTIES L 13705 SW FARMINGTON RD PO BOX 930 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 • 2S101BC-01801 2S-14443eretee0' MILLER LORI M 8365 SW HUNZIKER RD p -eOx-986 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101BC-03100 3619181M1302' NGUYEN VUONG P& VO PHAN 4,34£15-4"`TIRCL 12387 SW KNOLL DR Ji ACC1rQ9 o ')2o TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 BC-01100 2S 101 BC-00201 NITSOS STEVE TOM& WESTEC AMERICA INC BETTY MAXINE 8255 SW HUNZIKER 8465 SW HUNZIKER RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 BD-00300 2S 101 BC-02900 PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING GROUP IN WESTPHAL EDGAR A&PATRICE M 208 E WOODLAWN RD 1811 NW 93RD PL STE#200 PORTLAND,OR 97229 CHARLOTTE,NC 27217 2S 101 BC-00301 25101 BC-00103 REED WILLIAM C WETLANDS CONSERVANCY INC THE PO BOX 12564 PO BOX 1195 PORTLAND,OR 97212 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S 101 BC-03200 2S 101 BC-01200 REID CHARLES 0& WILDER GEORGE C&LUCETTE A RUTH A 8445 SW HUNZIKER ST 12435 SW KNOLL DR TIGARD,OR 97223 • TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 BC-02201 2S101 BC-01500 ROACH MICHAEL A AND PAMELA S WILLIAMS PORTUS W AND SARAH T 956 WEST POINT RD 12390 SW KNOLL DR LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 TIGARD,OR 97223 r f • • • 4 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 • Sue Rorrnan 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Crag head 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\Iabels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: April 18, 2002 : K • • Yun S. Hong ZON2002-00003 17450 West Valley Hwy. SYKART INDOOR RACING ZONE CHANGE Tukwila, WA 98188-5511 Ed Murphy & Associates 9875 SW Murdock Street Tigard, OR 97224 Knez Realty Group 8185 SW Hunziker Street Tigard, OR 97223-8229 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS • P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503)684-10 Legal :Notice 'f`z`'l 0lit.3 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Leg; 4 CITY OF TIGARD ' City of Tigard 444 ' �!, OREGON • Accounts Payable The following will be considered by the Tigard Planning 13125 SI-7 Nall Blvd. Commission on Monday October 21,2002,at 7:00 PM at the Tigard Civic Center-Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon. • Tigard, OR 972203 Both public oral and written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with Chapter 18390 of the Tigard Municipal Code,and the rules of procedure adopted by the Planning Commission. Testimony may be submitted in writing. — prior to or at the public hearing or verbally at the public hearing only. - AFFIDAVIT OF I Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior to STATE OF OREGON, the close of the hearing accompanied by statements or evidence ss. sufficient to allow the hearings authority and all the parties to respond COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) on the request,precludes an appeal,and failure to specify the criterion I Kathy Snyder from the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at being first duly sworn, depose and say ti which a comment is directed precludes an appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals based on that criterion. Director, or his principal clerk, of theme Further information ma be obtained from the Planning Division at a newspaper of general circulation as r Y g and 193.020; published at Ti.crar 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon 97223,or by calling 503-639- aforesaid county and state; that the PL 4171. A copy of the application (staff contact: Mathew S aforesaid >3y and r Racing Cpr Scheidegger) and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for . a printed copy of which is hereto annex, inspection at no cost. A copy of the staff report will be made available entire issue of said newspaper for ( for inspection at no cost at least seven(7) days prior to the hearing, and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. consecutive in the following issues: PUBLIC HEARING ITEM: ZONE CHANGE(ZON)2002-00003 Oct _ 3 , 2002 >SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE< REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to change the existing zone from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) in -order to convert an old industrial building into a "SyKart Indoor r Racing Center." LOCATION: 8205 SW Hunziker Street; WCTM "G , • 2S 101 BC,Tax Lot 200. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for Subscribed and sworn to befo - me this general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production,research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. PROPOSED ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning 1) . /o district provides appropriate locations for combi_ning; light My Commission Expires: - manufacturing;"office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., AFFIDAVIT restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.530. :' y: Oii S =: ..:_V ir..♦ 4 SHAW INDOOR MONG �' 'i., �,•`';, Ion OUNCE VA' + 1 `It,: 1 85. ti h..i—►, , ... . ■ N iiiii • , ,.' 0 CITY of TIGARD J GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM _ AREA NOTIFIED (500') 2 J Ilik m :;DEN PL 1 , :101400 .°0 181018801500 FOR: Ed Murphy It +tis 1111RE: 8205 SW Hunziker .1111111 019900,00 k 231018000301: 0189008, N-<< 2 0180008 0 _� 28101BC01500 '� a B6 800 ', ■ 018000108 n 100 20 181018000811 281, "00802 `� i�01BC� '00 �! BCO180� " ., s•mBB, � Property owner information . Ille% y „10; econo ` is valid for 3 months from sr' .� ` 4.. '$10100003, the date printed on this map. ,J 0180'0110 2 00 2s1o1BC002m j� \s>„ J• 18101880:200 /Q ■ T 18101e000100 :slolaco:: :C000 281018000800 ♦� 281011002401 01800 '.,, 281' 500 2810100028 • / `l0 ` 011002700 9���181 90 1101 • 181018602501 1' ill N 0 200 400 600 Feet \ 281010000700 1"=418 feet 1 A . City of Tigard Information on this map is for general location only and l should be verified with the Development Services Division.% 13125 SW Hall Blvd - Tigard,(503)63 4171 (503)839.4171 - I I I http://www.citigard.or.us , N Community Development Plot date:Jul 25,2002;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR • • 2S 101 BC-02100 2S 101 BC-01900 ANNAND JOHN D II&EDNA N DELAO ALICIA& 8260 SW HUNZIKER RD DELAO SANTA CECILIA& TIGARD,OR 97223 GARCIA ERNESTO 8335 SW HUNZIKER RD TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 BC-01800 2S 101 BD-00301 BEAUDOIN MICHAEL E& EAST SIDE VAN&STORAGE INC DONNA R 4836 SE POWELL BLVD 12490 SW KNOLL DR PORTLAND,OR 97206 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101 BB-01500 2S101 BC-02200 CALWEST INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS LLC HHO&B ASSOCIATES LLC BY DELOITTE&TOUCHE LLP BY H&A CONSTRUCTION CO 2235 FARADAY AVE STE 0 PO BOX 23755 CARLSBAD,CA 92008 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S 101 BC-02501 1314EW66T INCIA STRJA_',.k10,LEI IWS 1 C HUTTIG INC r" i i p 14500 SOUTH OUTER 40 RD 0 CHESTERFIELD,MO 63017 8 25101 BC-00400 2S101 BC-00500 CARASOF ALEX S&LILIYA V KIM KYONG SUK 12330 SW KNOLL DR 12300 SW KNOLL DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 BC-01000 2S 101 BC-02401 CLICKENER ROBERT R&PATRICIA A KING JAMES F 13855 SW PACIFIC HWY 12650 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 .2S4949C-0615011 - 2S 101 BC-02700 .C.1.16.14EAWNCILLA. KING JAMES F ies Y PO BOX 23819 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101BC-03300 SHeteettleR KISH ROBERT J/SUSAN C Y 7510 SW ASHFORD ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 101 BC-01600 2S101 BC-00100 DALTON LOIS KNEZ JOHN S SR&JEANNE M • 12420 SW KNOLL DR 8185 SW HUNZIKER RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101 BC-01700 2S101 BC-00200 DEFOE JUDITH A MCGEE& KNEZ REALTY GROUP LLC DEFOE CHARLES E JR 8185 SW HUNZIKER ST STE A 12455 SW 68TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 • __ 251a Dc ^j i 2S101BC-03000 kblE7.4,65,61W-6"OU L ROBERTS DAVID y SW NL UAZWAA^^ 12361 SW KNOLL DR T46ARiifreofi TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101 BC-02202 2S101 BC-02800 LEACH DOUGLAS SEVERSON JAMES A&ROBIN 0 8430 SW HUNZIKER RD STE 200 29404 SW HEATER RD PORTLAND,OR 97223 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 2S101 BC-02300 2S10100-00700 MCCARTHY KELLY E&JANICE L SMITH GERIG WESTERN PROPERTIES L 13705 SW FARMINGTON RD PO BOX 930 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 25101 BC-01801 ?5344864919e1T MILLER LORI M 8365 SW HUNZIKER RD P6-8OX-996 TIGARD,OR 97223 WILS(INVII I Fla,. 25101 BC-03100 264,115M17302. NGUYEN VUONG P& VO PHAN 4.84059YrrIntL 12387 SW KNOLL DR JI( A fl,.iiD a7.': TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101 BC-01100 2S101 BC-00201 NITSOS STEVE TOM& WESTEC AMERICA INC BETTY MAXINE 8255 SW HUNZIKER 8465 SW HUNZIKER RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 25101 BD-00300 2S101 BC-02900 PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING GROUP IN WESTPHAL EDGAR A&PATRICE M 208 E WOODLAWN RD 1811 NW 93RD PL STE#200 PORTLAND,OR 97229 CHARLOTTE,NC 27217 • 25101 BC-00301 25101 BC-00103 REED WILLIAM C WETLANDS CONSERVANCY INC THE PO BOX 12564 PO BOX 1195 PORTLAND,OR 97212 TUALATIN,OR 97062 25101 BC-03200 2S101 BC-01200 REID CHARLES 0& WILDER GEORGE C&LUCETTE A RUTH A 8445 SW HUNZIKER ST 12435 SW KNOLL DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 BC-02201 2S 101 BC-01500 ROACH MICHAEL A AND PAMELA S WILLIAMS PORTUS W AND SARAH T 956 WEST POINT RD 12390 SW KNOLL DR LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: April 18, 2002 • - • • CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF TIGARD Community<Development 13125 SW HAIL BOULEVARD Shaping A Better Community TIGARD, OREGON 91223 PHONE: 503-639-4111 FAX: 503-684-7297(Attn: Patty or Shirley/Planning) REM4UEST FOR 100 QOTc T ''OPE-IITY OWNER MAILING UST Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 1SI34AB,Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW and INCLUDE A MAP OF ALL LOTS FOR THE PROJECT (preferably assessor's tax map): g � —Li INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTING 2 OIk_ TS OF LABELS: (NOTE: A.minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided to place on your 2 sets of envelopes that applicants are iequired to submit at the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood meeting is required and you have not yet held that meeting, you should request 3 sets) NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: E � YYwA.IpA PHONE: 6a- This request may be mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request in "Will Call" by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE—TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description: $11 to generate the mailing list, plus $2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels (20 addresses per sheet). Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. *EXAMPLE* * * COST FOR THIS REQUEST * * 4 sheets of labels x$2/sheet = $8.00 x 2 sets = $16.00 . sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet = $ 4 x sets = 2 sheets of labels x$2/sheet for CIT area x 2 sets = $4.00 ,2,,sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet for(IT area = $4 x sets = $ GENERATE LIST = $40Q GENERATE LIST = $11.00 TOTAL = $31.00 TOTAL = $ Receipt #: 27200200000000002768 ---""�—� Date: 07/26/2002 T I D E M A R K COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC, Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due MISC Miscellaneous Fees&Charges-37.0000 @$1.00 100-0000-451000 $37.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Check ED MURPHY&ASSOCIATES DCP 2309 0 $37.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $37.00 L CITY OF TIGARD Community cDeve(opment Shaping Better Community .,.s,y..,p1 s,..•y:..a;'^ s,s:. :;. �. '�,:.:s. :i 3= .::a- :fir»•c,e - °c:;- 's� �M.:- s.::�,;:,c�'_.X'''°` ;-s.::�;:;>_'.. :�•i.:' �e �,y� sY �= 4gs :SE:PRaP�aS4LaDES�CRIPTION �;.. ,• ✓ .. .- ,..,s, F- „Y - ,..< ,.7 - i'e ,- se . ea- ..,.s..sz,,,�T.e , .- ,-> q ro .� � �..-., � �i_ ,,,...,.... • ,�. -.k nit., "Ft, xdH %.s., sA":." k 120 DAYS = 1/18/2003 FILE NO.: ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2002-00003 FILE TITLE: SYKART INDOOR RACING CENTER ZONE CHANGE APPLICANT: Yun S. Hong OWNER: Knez Realty Group 17450 West Valley Hwy. 8185 SW Hunziker Street Tukwila, WA 98188-5511 Tigard, OR 97223-8229 APPLICANT'S Ed Murphy& Associates REP.: 9875 SW Murdock Street Tigard, OR 97224 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to change the existing zone from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) in order to convert an old industrial building into a "SyKart Indoor Racing Center." LOCATION: 8205 SW Hunziker Street; WCTM 2S101 BC, Tax Lot 200. CURRENT ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if PROPOSED any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390 and 18.530. CIT AREA: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: ❑ TYPE I ❑ TYPE II © TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: SEPTEMBER 23,2002 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: OCTOBER 7,2002 ❑ HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ®PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: OCTOBER 21,2002 TIME: 7:00 PM ❑ CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM ❑ STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: L. COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION ® VICINITY MAP ® TRAFFIC REPORT ❑ UTILITY PLANS ® SITE PLAN ® EXISTING CONDITIONS ❑ IMPACT STUDY • NARRATIVE ❑ STORM DRAINAGE CALCS. ❑ ARCHITECTURAL PLANS STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner(503)639-4171,x 2437 - • PRE-APP.HELD BY: /445 alPo CITY OF'TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD OR `;97223-81'89` 503:639:4171/503:684:7297 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON •.. -: .,.:: .; '^: .>.:,LAN ..:.,' �;�.. D=iU�SE PERMIT APPLI'CAsTI'ON File#10003_ Other Case# I • Date 'Receipt:#. loin- 3'59? :Date:Applicaton:Completel TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑AdjustmentNariance (I or II) ❑ Minor Land Partition (II) ❑ Subdivision (II or Ill) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment(IV) ❑ Minor Modification (I) 0 Zone Change(III)J ❑ Conditional Use(III) ❑ Planned Development(III) ❑Zone Change Annexation (IV) ❑ Historic Overlay(II or III) ❑Sensitive Lands Review(I, II or III) ❑Zone Ordinance Amendment(IV) ❑ Home Occupation (I or II) ❑ Site Development Review(II) ❑ Miscellaneous (I)- (Lot Line Adjustment/Temporary Use/Tree Removal/Director's Interpretation, etc.) LUCA I ION WHERE PROPOSED AC I IVI I Y WILL OCCUR(Address If available) 8Z0 5 5'Li Hulk z kee c . , 715 4✓'d TAX MAP& 1 AX LO I NOS. ZS 16 ( gC O0Z-00 101 AL SI I L SILL LUNING CLASSIFICA I ION qi 2- ac its L;) 14 Ivttiu Stria) APPLICANT* �"" s. of MAILING ADUR SS/CI I Y/S FATE/LIP (7(56 (-Jest Vale 1-(L, ku 14 , i,jA 9-818&-sSti PHONE NU. / FAX NU. `(ZS- 25( -5060 `2-S -251 - 58'13 PRIMARY CON!ACT PERSON PHONE NU. Fct � rg�, sos - (Zy- (I (DZ5 PROPLRI Y OW EWD D OLDER(Attach list if more than one) MAILING S C.Re c I -P Gr44 p PHONE oles gW H-unzlk2r S4• , T ,4fdF 4R 9.74z3 - 5z9 So3 - 62 0 - 6142- So3 - 639 - Or to Z. *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY(Please be specific) Zt"e- Map QMPIAdkii? tt 1-1•,111- /rlcIusJv*.Q Ct' -L) -)'b /tick ,- I Durk ( !- �� APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET. O 1111 THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. ♦ All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. Owner's Signature Date • Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date `/ /U OZ Applicant/Agent! epre entative's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date SEP-10-2002 08 43 P.01 • t , T E APPLIC • T HALL CERTIFY_THAT: • If the appli. tion is granted,the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the 1 terms and bject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • i All the abov- statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits I transmitted erewith,are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this appl I ation, map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The appUcal t has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and unders1nds the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. ,.. , l _.. C II . 9-lO!?Z- O. :-r's Sig .-'ure Date • UUU J • er's Sign• re Date owner's Sign ure Date I - • ner's Signa ure Date Iwner's Sign.ture Date . l Applicant/Age t/Representative's Signature Date AppllcantlAg nt/Representative's Signature Date I I TOTAL P.01 Receipt #: 27200200000000003397 %� Date: 09/10/2002 TIDEMARK ECOPY COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due ZON2002-00003 [LANDUS]ZONE CHANGE 100-0000-438000 $2,290.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Check ED MURPHY&ASSOC MET 3033 $2,290.00 ' TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $2,290.00 • ill li A CITY OF TIGARD • OREGON September 20, 2002 Yun S. Hong 17450 West Valley Hwy. Tukwila, WA 98188-5511 RE: Notice of Complete Application Submittal (Svkart Indoor Racing/ZON2002-00003) Dear Mr. Hong: The City has received the information necessary to begin the review of your Zone Change application. Staff has, therefore, deemed your application submittal as complete. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171, x2437. Sincerely, -, -1111Y(f k, - .- Li ,..--- Mathew Scheidegger Assistant Planner i:\curpin\mathew\ZON\ZON2002-00003.acc.acc.doc.dot c: ZON2002-00003 Land Use file Ed Murphy, AICP 9875 SW Murdock Street Tigard, OR 97224 • 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.(503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 LAO USE APPLIC 'ION Date: e'ci`-- /6 - c=> COMPLETENESS REVIEW CCOMPLETE ❑ INCOMPLETE STANDARD INFORMATION: g Deed/Title/Proof Of Ownership Neighborhood Mtg. Affidavits, Minutes, List Of Attendees Impact Study(18.390) ❑ USA Service Provider Letter ❑ Construction Cost Estimate ❑ # Sets Of Application Materials/Plans Pre-Application Conference Notes a Envelopes With Postage (Verify Count) PROJECT STATISTICS: ❑ Building Footprint Size ❑, %Of Landscaping On Site ❑ %Of Building Impervious Surface On Site ❑ Lot Square Footage • PLANS DIMENSIONED: ❑ Building Footprint ❑ Parking Space Dimensions(Include Accessible&Bike Parking) ❑ Truck Loading Space Where Applicable ❑ Building Height ❑ Access Approach And Aisle ❑ Visual Clearance Triangle Shown ADDITIONAL PLANS: ❑ Vicinity Map ❑ Architectural Plan ❑ Tree Inventory ❑ Existing Conditions Plan ❑ Landscape Plan ❑ Site Plan ❑ Lighting Plan TREE PLAN/MITIGATION PLAN: ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • ADDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special reports) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS: ❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 1 8.620(rigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 18.765(off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) • ❑ 18.340(Director's Interpretation) ❑ 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ❑ 18.115(Sensitive lands Review) ❑ 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ 18.105(Access/Egress/Gradation) ❑ 18.180 Signs) ❑ 18.360(Site Development Review) ❑ 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.185(Temporary Use Permits) ❑ 18.310(Variances/Adfustn ants) • ❑ 18.115(Density Computations) ❑ 18.190(free Removal) ❑ 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ❑ 18.195(Visual Clearance Areas) ❑ 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ❑ 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) ❑ 18.797(Water Resources(WR)overlay District) ❑ 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) ❑ 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) ❑ 18.410(lot tine Adpmsenents) ❑ 18.140(Historic overlay) ❑ 18.810(Street&utility Improvement Standards) ❑ 18.420(Land Partitions) ❑ 18.742(Hone occupation Permits) ❑ 18.430(subdmvisions) ❑ 18.145(landscaping&Screening Standards) ❑ 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) .❑ 18.520(Convnerdal Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.155(Mixed Solid wute/Recydng Storage) .❑ 18.530(industrial zoning District) ❑ 18.160(Honconfomming Situations) ADDITIONAL ITEMS: l:\curpin\masters\revised\land use application completeness review.dot REVISED: 17-Jan-01 1.4 . • CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATIONS BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS This checklist identifies the basic submittal requirements for a land use application. BASIC INFORMATION: B" Completed Master"Land Use Permit"Application with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization EY Title transfer instrument or grant deed GI,' Written summary of proposal Ci Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Gil' Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed #10 envelopes for all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (#10), addressed with 1" x 4" labels (see envelope submittal requirements). Property owner mailing lists must be prepared by the City for a minimal fee (see request for 500' property owner mailing list form). [d' • Documentary evidence of Neighborhood Meeting for the following: Site Development Review, Subdivision, Conditional Use, Sensitive Lands Review,Zone Change, Comprehensive Plan Amendments. li3' Neighborhood Meeting Affidavits of Posting & Mailing Notice, Minutes, Sign-in Sheets ❑ Service Provider Letter C tWo0 I;V. Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) — See Pact e ZS 2- Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes l9' Filing Fee(see fee schedule) PLANS REQUIRED: In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or.plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (See separate attachment for details on what information to include on each plan): ❑ Vicinity Map ❑ Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan ❑ Existing Conditions Map ❑ Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan ❑ Site Development Plan ❑ Architectural Drawings (elevations&floor plans) ❑ Landscape Plan ❑ Sign Drawings ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR PURPOSES OF REVIEWING YOUR APPLICATION FOR COMPLETENESS, ONLY 3 COPIES ARE NEEDED. THE BALANCE OF THE COPIES WILL BE REQUESTED FROM YOU, ONCE DEEMED COMPLETE, TO MAKE YOUR APPLICATION SUBMITTAL COMPLETE. h:\patty\masters\appiication submittal requirements.doc UPDATED: 26-Jun-02 • • / l N • CITY OF TIGARD September 19, 2002 OREGON Yun S. Hong 17450 West Valley Hwy. Tukwila, WA 98188=5511 RE: Notice of Incomplete Application Submittal (Svkart Indoor Racinq/ZON2002-00003) Dear Mr. Hong: The City has not received the information necessary to begin the review of your Zone Change application. Staff has, therefore, deemed your application submittal incomplete as of 09/19/02. Please submit the following information in order for Staff to begin your review: Submit 16 copies of a narrative addressing all of the applicable criteria of the Tigard Development Code. If you have any questions about the information contained in this letter, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171, x2437. Sincerely, � �i G L_O -: Mathew Scheidegger Assistant Planner is\curpin\mathew\ZO N\ZON2002-00003.acc.doc.dot c: ZON2002-00003 Land Use file Ed Murphy, AICP 9875 SW Murdock Street Tigard, OR 97224 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 • • . R E C E i Y E U JUN 2 6 2000 STATE OREGON ss CountyATOF of Washington_ _ ,.;r P of Assess- meat and .; It -4. `yye�a County fora itv that • the s3;.y ;k •. teceived �No �. .. i said and re',., ti c� county r-}4t, � :,..:u.:� f r."titm Ss L s- �,9�;,Z� lost ; irector of • t,T ,:f axation,Ex- e. MY; tie* After recording, return to: Doc : 2000044357 Knez Realty Group LLC Rect: 256060 42.00 8185 SW Hunziker Street, Suite A 06/05/2000 04:27:11pm Tigard, OR 97223-8229 --- SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED U.S. NATURAL RESOURCES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Grantor, conveys and specially warrants to KNEZ REALTY GROUP, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, Grantee, the real property in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, described on attached Exhibit A (the "Property"), free of encumbrances created or suffered by the Grantor except as specifically set forth in attached Exhibit B. The true consideration for this conveyance is ONE MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,750,000). This deed is given by Grantor in full satisfaction of Grantor's obligations under that certain Standard Contract of Sale between Grantor and Grantee dated April 30, 1997 (the "Contract"), a memorandum of which was recorded on May 1, 1997 in the Records of Washington County, Oregon at Document No. 97040497, Rect 185479. THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING Until a change is requested, all tax statements shall be sent*to: Knez Realty Group, LLC 8185 SW Hunziker Street, Suite A Tigard, OR 97223-8229 Property Tax Account No.: 2S 1 1BC 00200; Key No. R458365 Portlnd1-2036119.1 0017081-00003 4124(00 3:11 P1.i 5 T 'al SLOG LSS COS OH Z3WN Wdbt, : TT Z0OZ 60 d3S • • DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. DATED as of the __ day of April, 2000. GRANTOR: U.S. NATURAL RESOURCES, INC., a Delaware corporation By: rn. / --ea,.. Printed Name: ll oN A L A R 8 E c.1-41E tJ Title: Vick Pees t e.)T STATE OF ta9Shi of l ss. County of C&.9.. On this ,2#rCay of April, 2000, before me personally appeared _nom o id 4 to me personally known to be the /,I ,0_, fite,s4e_e_Ail of U.S. NATURAL RESOURCES, INC., a Delaware corporation, the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal the day and year first above written. Signatur- - -•o/ -�� Q.,s B. FE,9, ,r(<5" ���ssM > Name(Print): Ch G iC/:1.�%'tt o OTARy ` NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of cP PUB Iz Washington, residing at ii4C.ol T .7.b, 7-tQ 2.61 A My appointment expires: /o/ ,/ Ct)?■ (t%OF stiV- Poolndl-2036119.1.1 00170E1-00003 2 a 'd SLOG LSS EOS bH Z3WN WE -bt TI 2002 60 d3S • • • • EXHIBIT A '10 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED PARCEL I: A parcel of land located in the Northwest one-quarter of Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at an iron pipe on the North line of the W.W. Graham Donation Land Claim No. 39, situated in said Section 1, which bears South 82°37' East along said North line, 123.0 feet from the Northwest corner of said Donation Land Claim; thence South 82°37' East along said North line, a distance of 211.5 feet, more or less, to the Northwest corner of that certain tract of land conveyed to Thomas W. and Minta Saddler, as described on Page 71 of Volume 166 of Washington County Deed Records; thence South 12°24' West along the West line of said Saddler Tract, a distance of 866.5 feet to the center line of SW Hunziker Road (County Road No. 34), 40 feet in width; thence North 60°59' West along said center line, a distance of 362.0 feet to a point which bears South 22°47' West,. 22.3 feet from an iron pipe; thence North 22°47' East, a distance of 756.8 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPT THEREFROM that portion of the above described parcel lying within SW Hunziker Road, and EXCEPT THEREFROM the following described parcel: Commencing at an iron pipe in the North line of said W.W. Graham Donation Land Claim No. 39 in said county and state which bears South 82°37' East, 123.0 feet from the Northwest corner of said Claim No. 39; thence South 22°47'00" West, a distance of 541.00 feet to the point of beginning of the parcel herein to be described; thence continuing South 22°4700" West, a distance of 195.70 feet to a point in the Northerly line of SW Hunziker Road; thence South 60°59'00" East along said Northerly line, a distance of 192.28 feet; thence North 23°45'47" East, a distance of 239.12 feet; thence North 73°47'30" West, a distance of 196.52 feet to the point of beginning, and EXCEPT THEREFROM the following described parcel: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the W.W. Graham Donation Land Claim; thence South 82°55'00" East 123.00 feet to a 1 inch iron pipe; thence South 22°47'00" West 561.08 feet; thence South 73°47'30" East 196.17 feet to the point of beginning of the herein described parcel; thence from said point of beginning, South 73°47'30" East 18.73 feet; thence South 23°45'47" West 213.12 feet to a point on the Northerly right-of-way line of Hunziker Road; thence along said Northerly line North 60°59'00" West 18.64 feet; thence North 23°45'47" East 208.95 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL II: A parcel of land located in the Northwest one-quarter of Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the W.W. Graham Donation Land Claim; thence South 82°55'00" East 123.00 feet to a 1 inch iron pipe; thence South 22°47'00" West 541.00 feet to the point of beginning of the herein described tract; thence from said point of beginning, South 73°47'30" East 196.52 feet; thence South 23°45'47" West 20.12 feet; thence North 73°47'30" West 196.17 feet; thence North 22°47'00" East 20.08 feet to the point of beginning. D chibit A - Page 1 of 1 3 E •d SLOG LSS EOS bH Z3N)I • Wdbt : T T 2002 60 d3S • • EXHIBIT B EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE 1. ,. 2. An easement created by instrument, including the terms and provisions thereof, Dated October 5,.-1973 Recorded • October 8, 1973 Book 948 Page ▪ 304 In favor of Adjacent property owner For not disclosed That portion of said easement affecting the Property described herein lying Northerly of the property described in that certain statutory warranty deed to Westec America Incorporated recorded on June 29, 1990 at Recorder's Fee Number 90- 34347 was terminated by Quitclaim Deed, Dated October 10, 1984 Recorded • January 7, 1985 Rec. Fee No. • 85000561 3. An easement created by instrument, including the terms and provisions thereof, Dated August 23, 1973 Recorded ▪ October 26, 1973 Book • 950 Page • 838 In favor.of City of Tigard- For Underground sewer purposes and appurtenant facilities 4. An easement created by instrument, including the terms and provisions thereof, Dated June 16, 1975 Recorded September 17, 1975 Book • 1044 Page : 495 In favor of • City of Tigard For Slope easement Ponlndl-2036119.1 0017081-00003 Exhibit B - Page 1 of 2 1 b 'd SLOG LSS COS OH Z3N)1 WeSb = ii 2002 60 d3S • • •' 5. Unrecorded Agreement, including the terms and provisions thereof, Dated April 26, 1978 Between ▪ U.S. Natural Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation And • Prendergast & Associates, Inc., an Oregon corporation As disclosed by Memorandum of Agreement, Dated April 26, 1978 Recorded • May 4, 1978 Recorder's Fee No. : 78 204.03 Documents recorded on January 7, 1985 at Recorder's Fee Numbers 85000560, 85000561 and 8500062 refer to such Agreement. However, an Easement Agreement providing for a joint access and utilities to benefit both parcels and an exclusive easement for access and parking to benefit the Prendergast& Associates, Inc. parcel was provided for in the above agreement but remains unrecorded. This Easement Agreement with minor revisions was signed on October 10, 1984 by U.S. Natural Resources, Inc. and a partner of Seaport Associates, a Washington partnership, successor in interest to Prendergast&Associates, Inc., but has not been recorded. 6. Any and all matters created or suffered by or through Grantee or that are otherwise the responsibility of Grantee under the above-described Contract. Ponlnd1-2J36119.1 0017081-00003 Exhibit B - Page 2 of 2 S 'd SLOL LSS 60S OH Z3WN WbSI : TI Z00Z 60 d3S • - ,!AFFIDAVIT OF MAILSG/POSTING NEIGHBORHOtD MEETING NOTICE MP.ORTANT. NOTICE OTHE APPUcANTiSf RE UIRED:TO:MAIL=THE'CITY`•OF.:TIGARD,"AICOPY'OF THE NEI. HBORH00 =tMEETING NOTICE:yTHATaaPERT INS:TO_THI_S:AFFIDAVITi ATxTHE SAME=TIME4PROPER_ TY �✓-•..T......,-..«...Y•••.w-•c .��_. T.. ..�.:._rw.._..a.�....-._.. v..,.......!wjfi._r,+....-fin'- _ �t 1_ _ ..7. -:3i". •4'. ti S:ARE;-MAIL'ED NOT �T �THE�ADD OWNER {„ .ICEa 0 RES�S�'BELOW' r . .. . ..._. .... �.. ....,..-. . City.4f.Ti ,d Plannin 'Dwision .:.<., ,..r,,.,.--. .,.r :M1::.-a,. ..9._ a/L.,,.-^P• p.• . Y^'. Y Y-,..�.. r 1.3.125;5. oulevard° W��HaI1..B Tigard, OR 972>23=8189 • y : ,IN .AD DIT_..I ON'TH...E.•�'APPLICANTS HALL 'still MI D AVIT T &,CPI.,.., . _ .,A..,._,.. NOT.�.ICE SA._.�THE TIME OFAPPLICA T ION,, MAILING: I, /11 U✓ qty being duly sworn, depose and say that on the 1 S� day of AA914S t 2002 , I caused to have mailed to each of the per ons on The attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss d proposed development at(or near) 8 ZO S" Sc.J t f K At IRe. ç . .a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at with postage prepaid thereon. Signature (In the p ence of a to Public) POSTING: 1 I, I u v'�)ti y , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s)and/or tax lot(s)currently registered) 8Z<O S S W tt vt Lire✓ and did on the I Sf" day of A✓ut(u s{" , 20 OZ personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a LOM . C L(u application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at QN it/12 n UL a ki)11 C41 if u o1 Z i�e✓ (state location you posted notice on property) Signature (In the resence of a ota Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF 02E.(wrotO ) County of (Opel.' 4T ■ ) ss. pp� Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the IO day of f .v�cr , 20 e'-":"• OFFICIAL SEAL DIANE M JELDERKS I / NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.326578 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT,07.2003 i NOTARY PUBLIC ,, OR ON My Commissio (3'pires: Applicant,please complete'the information below: NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Address or General Location of Subject Property: Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): h:Voginlpatty masterslaffidavit of mailing-posting neighborhood meeting.doc • • Exhibit 'F' NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE Land use application for property at 8205 SW Hunziker St. The lessee of the property at 8205 SW Hunziker Street, Mr. Yun S. Hong, intends to apply for a zoning map amendment for this property from Light Industrial (L-I) to Industrial Park (I-P). Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for this amendment, Mr. Hong would like to discuss the proposal with the surrounding property owners and residents, and any other interested citizens. You are invited to attend an informational meeting on: THURSDAY, AUGUST 15, 2002 7:00 P.M. CITY WATER BUILDING (RICHARD BROWN AUDITORIUM) 8777 SW BURHAM STREET, TIGARD Explanation Mr. Hong intends to apply for a zoning map amendment from Light Industrial to Industrial Park on Tax Lot 25101 BC00200, a 4.2-acre property at • 8205 SW Hunziker Street (see attached maps). The reason for the proposed zoning map amendment is that the I-P zone permits "indoor recreation", while the L-I zone does not. Mr. Hong desires to develop a "SyKart Indoor Racing Center", similar to one he has operated in Tukwila, Washington for the last three years, at this site. The racing center and related offices and conference rooms will be entirely within the existing building. The racecars are actually little go-karts, outfitted with catalytic converters and mufflers. The proposed SyKart Indoor Racing Center will bring a fun,- wholesome, recreational and training activity to Tigard, and make great use of an old industrial building. Before submitting the Zoning Map Amendment application to the City of Tigard, Mr. Hong is required by the City to hold a neighborhood meeting to explain the proposal to interested citizens and solicit their comments. (Please note that this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City.) If you have any questions, please come to the informational meeting, or contact me at the phone number, mailing address, e-mail address, or fax number listed below. CONTACT: Ed Murphy, Planning Consultant, Ed Murphy & Associates •ADDRESS: 9875 SW Murdock St., Tigard, OR 97224 PHONE NUMBER: 503.624.4625 FAX NUMBER: 503.968.1674 E-MAIL: ejmurphy@jaol.com August 1,2002 ,�runr Nair • 2S101BC-03000 • ROBERTS DAVID $1.8 SW HI 11 4/.44 nD 12361 SW KNOLL DR T TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 1018C-02202 2S 101 BC-02800 LEACH DOUGLAS SEVERSON JAMES A&ROBIN 0 8430 SW HUNZIKER RD STE 200 29404 SW HEATER RD PORTLAND,OR 97223 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 25101 BC-02300 2S10100-00700 MCCARTHY KELLY E&JANICE L SMITH GERIG WESTERN PROPERTIES L 13705 SW FARMINGTON RD PO BOX 930 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 2S 101 BC-01801 � MILLER LORI M 8365 SW HUNZIKER RD Pe BOX 990 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S 101 BC-03100 r NGUYEN VUONG P& VO PHAN le1+25-31A, nHLL 12387 SW KNOLL DR TI(APr\,QD 071•11 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1018C-01100 2S 101 BC-00201 NITSOS STEVE TOM& WESTEC AMERICA INC BETTY MAXINE 8255 SW HUNZIKER 8465 SW HUNZIKER RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 BD-00300 2S 101 BC-02900 PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING GROUP IN WESTPHAL EDGAR A&PATRICE M • 208 E WOODLAWN RD 1811 NW 93RD PL STE#200 PORTLAND,OR 97229 CHARLOTTE,NC 27217 2S1018C-00301 25101 BC-00103 REED WILLIAM C WETLANDS CONSERVANCY INC THE PO BOX 12564 PO BOX 1195 PORTLAND,OR 97212 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S 101 BC-03200 2S 101 BC-01200 REID CHARLES 0& WILDER GEORGE C&LUCETTE A • RUTH A 8445 SW HUNZIKER ST 12435 SW KNOLL DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 1016C-02201 2S 101 BC-01500 ROACH MICHAEL A AND PAMELA S WILLIAMS PORTUS W AND SARAH T 956 WEST POINT RD 12390 SW KNOLL DR LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 2S1:.43C-02100 2S101 BC-01900 ANNAND JOHN D II&EDNA N DELAO ALICIA& 8260 SW HUNZIKER RD DELAO SANTA CECILIA& TIGARD,OR 97223 GARCIA ERNESTO 8335 SW HUNZIKER RD TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 BC-01800 2S10180-00301 BEAUDOIN MICHAEL E& EAST SIDE VAN&STORAGE INC DONNA R 4836 SE POWELL BLVD 12490 SW KNOLL DR PORTLAND,OR 97206 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S10198-01500 2S 101 BC-02200 CALWEST INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS LLC HHO&B ASSOCIATES LLC BY DELOITTE&TOUCHE LLP BY H&A CONSTRUCTION CO 2235 FARADAY AVE STE 0 PO BOX 23755 CARLSBAD,CA 92008 TIGARD,OR 97281 , gtgqise 2S101 BC-02501 HUTTIG INC 14500 SOUTH OUTER 40 RD 2 0 CHESTERFIELD,MO 63017 8 2S101 BC-00400 2S 101 BC-00500 CARASOF ALEX S&LILIYA V KIM KYONG SUK 12330 SW KNOLL DR 12300 SW KNOLL DR • TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101 BC-01000 2S 101 BC-02401 CLICKENER ROBERT R&PATRICIA A KING JAMES F 13855 SW PACIFIC HWY 12650 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 app - 2S101BC-02700 KING JAMES F Y PO BOX 23819 TIGARD,OR 97223 yrygteru— )pp 2S101 BC-03300 KISH ROBERT J/SUSAN C Y 7510 SW ASHFORD ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 101 BC-01600 2S 101 BC-00100 DALTON LOIS KNEZ JOHN S SR&JEANNE M • 12420 SW KNOLL DR 8185 SW HUNZIKER RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 BC-01700 2S 101 BC-00200 DEFOE JUDITH A MCGEE& KNEZ REALTY GROUP LLC DEFOE CHARLES E JR 8185 SW HUNZIKER ST STE A 12455 SW 68TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 • • Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD = EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: April 18, 2002 • ' ,(SIGNS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PdalASE AT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICESOUNTER AT THE PRICE OF$2,00 EACH.) N OT I CE Developer to hold NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING concerning proposed development of this property. Meeting Date Time Location f'tmitAst ts, 2ecZ 7:6o Pm Ci'FYWake BItici . 8777 sw attrivain PROPOSED PROJECT: Zohe Cl�u"9t -�rc,r uqti h4rf1 1e I4sfr. I pdc For More Information Contact: Developer Name: a jNryr qr1 • A Address: 975 St,J "ad C{c z;art/ Telephone: So; - 6ZiI- N6z5 PRO ?OSA L / NARR'rn vE . \ •.:". $ . ... :.°•0*****0 lei : ....,:. ......, A,A4A$1. AAA.\It AA, i.444, ...A4A ....... A44, IZ A:A4 A. 0 Ate$A,A4: .1:!. ....11.. \ \ ..: .. OA— $1......:4 :IAAA, , A. •. I. ' A ...AA.. ....,,, :AAA:,1 AAA:44. r; '4'■`. ..v.‘...i:::: .1'7, ..::.... ..)t p.:. \ It .t. „...., S f Tv: ; Z itl'4, ..:4Wgr .4:::;,:::. • :: 0 • • NI, . • • • • • • • • • • • • ” 006 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SyKart Zone Change Application • • TABLE OF CONTENTS • • KEY INFORMATION 1 • SUMMARY 3 • • BACKGROUND INFORMATION 5 • COMPARISON OF I-L AND I-P ZONES 7 • SUMMARY OF NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING 13 • • COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CRITERIA 15 • Criteria#1 -- demonstration of compliance with all applicable • comprehensive plan policies and map designations 15 Criteria#2-- demonstration of compliance with all applicable standards • of any provision of this code or other applicable implementing ordinance 21 • Criteria#3. Evidence of change in the neighborhood or community 26 • ....or evidence of a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan • or zoning map 28 • STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS 31 • CONCLUSIONS 33 EXHIBITS 35 • • Exhibit 'A' Tax Assessor's map • Exhibit'B' Photographs of the existing building and site • Exhibit'C' Existing Conditions drawing Exhibit'D' Zoning Map Exhibit `E' Photographs of uses allowed in the I-L zones • Photographs of uses restricted in the I-P zone • Exhibit 'F' Minutes/record of neighborhood meeting Exhibit'G' Topographic map • • Exhibit 'H' List of properties zoned I-H, I-L and I-P, sorted by zone and size • Exhibit 'I' Traffic Report I S M A • SyKart Zone Change Application A • KEY INFORMATION • Project Name: SyKart Zoning Map amendment • • Property Description: 2S101 BC00200 A Location: 8205 SW Hunziker Street • Parcel size: 4.2 acres • • Current Comp. Plan: Industrial • Current Zoning: Light Industrial (I-L) • Applicant: Yun S. Hong, Sykart's Indoor Racing Center • • Applicants Representatives: Land Use Planner Ed Murphy, AICP • Ed Murphy & Associates 9875 SW Murdock St., Tigard, Oregon 97224 • 503-624-4625 telephone 503-968-1674 fax A Traffic Engineer Howard Stein, P.E. • CTS Engineers, Inc. _ • 3300 NW 211th Terrance • Hillsboro, Oregon 97214 503-690-8080 telephone • 503-645-5930 fax • Site Designer Mark Ferris, A.S.L.A. • LanDynamics 20942 SW Siletz Court • Tualatin, Oregon 97062 • 503-692-9419 telephone 503-885-1247 fax • • • • S A • edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7/02 S • SyKart Zone Change Applicat• • • • • t• • • • THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2 edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7!02 . • 110 • •.0. • SyKart Zone Change Application M • SUMMARY • • Mr. Hong seeks an amendment to the Zoning Map from Light Industrial (I-L) to Industrial Park (I-P) in order to convert an old industrial building into a "SyKart Indoor Racing • Center", similar to one he has operated in Tukwila, Washington for the last three years. • The racecars are little go-karts, outfitted with catalytic converters and mufflers. • ♦ Such as use would be classified as "indoor entertainment", which is a permitted use in • the Industrial Park (I-P) zone, but not in the Light Industrial (I-L) zone. • • The racing center and related offices and conference rooms will be entirely within the existing 34,777 square feet building, including the ticket office and observation area. No outdoor recreational activities or facilities are planned. • • • No change to the Comprehensive Plan is necessary. The Comprehensive Plan designation will remain "Industrial". • • There are currently 689 acres of land zoned for industrial uses in Tigard, not counting land in public ownership. If the zone change is approved, there will still be 689 acres of land zoned for industrial uses in Tigard. The zone change would not remove any land from the industrial lands inventory. • The I-P zone is usually applied adjacent to residential districts in other areas of the City. In this area, the I-L zone abuts an R-4.5 low-density residential zone. It also abuts other properties along SW Hunziker Street zoned I-P. • • ♦ The I-P zone is intended for uses that have less negative impact than the uses allowed • in the I-L zone. The I-P zone allows light industrial, indoor recreation, offices, and commercial lodging outright. It also allows (with restrictions) retail sales and eating and 5 drinking establishments. However, the I-P zone does not allow general and heavy • industrial uses, warehouses, freight movement, and motor vehicle sales and rentals. • ♦ The environmental impacts of changing the zoning from I-L to I-P are positive. The uses • allowed in the I-P zone typically generate less truck traffic, noise, vibration, glare/outdoor lighting and odors than the uses allowed in the I-L uses. More specifically, there will be • little if any significant noise, glare, odor, vibration or other off-site impacts from the • proposed use. S • edmurphy&associateslhong/zcapp/9/7/02 3 • • •• SyKart Zone Change Application • • Most of the activities take place in the evening between 8:00 and 10:00 PM, and on • weekends. Parking will be in front of the building. Shared parking with the adjacent industrial uses is available if needed. • Subsequent to this zone change application, we will demonstrate that the number of • parking spaces available at this site is more than sufficient to meet the needs of the • business. Mr. Hong is not proposing to pave any additional surface. A • The proposed zone change would not have any significant effect on transportation • facilities or traffic operations. The proposed race center is busiest in the off-peak hours, • has limited capacity due to the nature of the business, and does not generate truck • traffic. • • The proposed use would be an effective and appropriate adaptive re-use of a 42-year I old industrial building —a building that is now used to store sheetrock. • • • There are no other buildings of this size currently available in Tigard in any zone (with the exception of the old GM Training Center building on Pacific Highway, which is 35,832 sq. ft.). More importantly, there are no other buildings with the positive characteristics of this building for an indoor racing center (high ceilings, lots of natural light, thick concrete walls, viewing areas from which to watch the races, and a large conference room). • The proposed SyKart Indoor Racing Center will bring a fun and wholesome, recreational and training activity to Tigard, which has very limited opportunities for indoor recreation. (A bowling alley, a paint ball facility and two movie theaters are the only private indoor recreation facilities available). • • These types of facilities are very popular in Europe. There are over 200 such facilities in • England, and 60 in Belgium. There are none in Oregon. • • I • • I I I M • 4 edmurphy&associateslhong/zcapp/9/7/02 • 0 • SyKort Zone Change Application 0 • - . • BACKGROUND INFORMATION • i' History: The property has been zoned for Industrial uses for many years. The . _building was originally built in 1960 by Irvington-Moore, which used it to manufacture • machinery for plywood mills until 1996, when Knez. Realty Group LLC acquired it. It has • been used since that time by Power Rents (for storing and repairing equipment) and Safway • Scaffolding, and is now used by Knez Building Materials to 'store sheetrock. (see • Photographs of the Building and Site, Exhibit 'A'). • Although the records of the zoning history are not clear, it was apparently zoned M-3, Light Industrial, in August 1977. In 1982 the M-3 zone was revised, and, renamed I-L. Certain uses, such as offices, were not longer allowed in the I-L zone. • 0 In 1988, the adjacent property, tax lot 2S101 BC00201, was rezoned from I-L to I-P at the 0 request of the property owner. (See Tax'Assessor's Map, Exhibit 'B'),. The building on that • parcel, built in 1973 under the classification of a "public utility", became a permitted office 6 use under the I-P.zone. M i In 1997, the 2-story office portion of the building in which Mr. Hong wishes to develop an . indoor racing center was completely remodeled and upgraded by'Power Rents. The • upgrade included adding handicapped accessible restrooms on the ground floor. (See BUP ill Hunziker At that time, Mr. Knez constructed a handicapped accessible walkway from SW S Hunziker Street to the front door, re-striped the existing spaces, and provided handicapped parking spaces, new wheel stops, and sidewalk curb cuts. (See Existing Conditions, Exhibit r 'CI Adjacent zoning and uses. The property is bordered on the southwest by the 2-story II office building mentioned above, zoned I-P, and to the east and southeast by industrial 5 buildings, zoned I-L: The area to the north of the property is zoned General Commercial (C- G) and is developed as a business park. There is a mix of industrial and office uses along • SW Hunziker Street, zoned I-P and I-L. There are single-family detached homes on the west side of the property, zoned R-4.5, served by Knoll Drive. The closest home is IV• approximately 250 feet from the building in which Mr. Hong proposes to operate the SyKart III center. (See Zoning Map, Exhibit D'). III Description of Proposal. The proposed use will be inside of an existing industrial building. I Mr. Hong will improve the outside appearance of the buiding, but is not planning on ID expanding the building. (The existing building footprint is 31,740 square feet; however, a ID I edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp 19/7/02 5 I • SyKart Zone Change Application • • r y` • portion of the building is two-story, with 3077 square feet of offices on each floor, so the total • gross area of the building is 34,817 square feet.) There is an existing sign structure at the entranc4 to the site on SW Hunziker Street, which Mr. Hong will use as a sign for the new businesiby changing the sign faces. The parking •• area is already paved and striped (although som -of the pavement markings are faded and will have to be re=painted), and has mature landscaping. • F -- - To the north of the main building is a large parkirig ors storage area, part of which is paved, • and part of which is gravel. A small storage buil4ngo!is located towards the back (north) of • the parcel. Mr. Hong does not intend to use the ateabehind the main building, and it is not • part of his lease agreement. • a,,.• • Mr. Hong does not plan any changes to the utilitie4._Ttte building is already connected to city 0 sewer and water. Storm drainage from the park` q lot is generally towards SW Hunziker • Street. There are no sensitive lands that will be A:impacted by the proposed use, i.e. • wetlands, steep slopes, floodplains, or wildlife habitats.;. Since this is an already developed parcel with ri existing industrial building, it does not strictly meet all of the current city zoning and development standards. For instance, the 0 northwest corner of the building is 32.5' from the west property line, whereas the required • • setback for new development is 50' because it is neit to a residential zone. It is not feasible 40 to bring the entire site up to current city standards.-,Mr. Hong will apply for variances or • adjustments to any of the development standards that'are simply impractical to meet. • • A 0 • 41 S I 0 S i I • S I a 6 edmurphyRrassociatesihonglzcapp/9/7/02 5 I I • • SyKart Zone Change Application I • COMPARISON OF I-L AND I-P ZONES r The general purpose and description of the zones is found in Chapter 18.530, quoted below. i The actual uses allowed are listed in Table 18.530.1, shown on the following pages. In the Table,•some of the significant differences between the I-L and I-P zones are shown in bold type. 18.530.010 Purpose • Provide range of industrial services for City residents. One of the major purposes of the regulations governing development in industrial zoning districts is to ensure that a full range of • job opportunities are available throughout the City so that residents can work close to home if they choose. The location of land within each industrial district must be carefully selected and 5 design and development standards created to minimize the potential adverse impacts of industrial activity on established residential areas. • • • Facilitate economic goals. Another purpose of these regulations is to ensure that there is a full range of economic activities and job opportunities within the City limits, in compliance with the • economic goals of the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan. • 18.530.020 List of Zoning Districts • A. I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for • combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review,design and development standards in the I-P zone • have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, • and pedestrian-friendly. S 1111 B. I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general r industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement,and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise,glare,odor,and vibration. S S A S M S 0 • edmurphy&associateslhong/zcapp/9/7/02 7 S I SyKart Zone Change Applicat• • TABLE 18.530.1 '10 USE TABLE: INDUSTRIAL ZONES . _ ._ . is r ' ` x 1NOUSTRIAL"PAR.I( „- LIGHT IND4 STRIAL • s USE CATEGORY - r '� F _r•,a_. -;-=, k_r. -, mac j u ' -6-1.P 4- r 1 (10;:, x4?- ", RESIDENTIAL 1 Household Living ! R 1 R i • Group Living N N Transitional Housing -_--- -- r -- ----- N - - - - -- N - - - { • Home Occupation - - _- �_ N -- N CIVIC(INSTITUTIONAL) ,- _ __ _--_ — • I Basic Utilities - j _ C C 1 • 4 Colleges - =-- ---��-� - -N---- - - -N 1 • Community Recreation I C 10 C 10 I II Cultural Institutions N N Day Care R 3,9 ; R 3,9 • j Emergency Services _ P f _ P __ I Medical Centers N N j Postal Service ----- - - ----- P l -_------P I Public Support Facilities I P P i Religious Institutions N __ N 0 I Schools N -- N • 1 Social/Fraternal Clubs/Lodges N N 1 COMMERCIAL Commercial Lodging { P - N Eating and Drinking Establishments R 2 N 1 • -Entertainment-Oriented -�_ _-_ j __- -Major Event Entertainment N {( N - • - Outdoor Entertainment P N I • ^Indoor Entertainment ^_- _ P - N • '•. -Adult Entertainment 1 N 1 N ' General Retail. _ ___ - _. 5 _S a l e s-O_r i e n t e_d_ R 2 N i • 1 - Personal Services _ I R 2 N j 1 . -Repair-Oriented _-_ - _ - { __ P _ I N -- --I • -Bulk Sales • ! N _ N - Outdoor Sales N P i ill • • • • 8 edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7/02 5 a fa II lik SyKart Zone Change Application l • T INDUSTRIAL' PARK LIGHT INDUSTRIAL �FSE CATEGORY y � a , t e ! __ Animal-Related —, T P P -- r- Motor Vehicle Related - Motor Vehicle Sales/Rental w __ N P - Motor Vehicle Servicing/Repair I _ C f P_— 1 r -Vehicle Fuel Sales _ _ ; P i P/C 7 Olce -- -- — P— -- 1— -- N --- -- • , Self-Service Storage I P P Non-Accessory Parking _ _ P � P • (_INDUSTRIAL , V C 5 Industrial Services _ ! N P 5 Manufacturing and Production ill -Light Industrial j P P i - General Industrial I N P 41111 -Heavy Industrial N N • Railroad Yards N N 0 I Research and Development P P O Warehouse/Freight Movement N P • ( Waste-Related N N • 0 Wholesale Sales R 4 P O OTHER • I __Agriculture/Horticulture 1 —^P 5 ( P 5 Cemeteries N C 1 Detention Facilities C N • Heliports C C • Mining N N O r Wireless Communication Facilities _ P/R 6 —_— P _ Rail Lines/Utility Corridors P ! P S • P=Permitted R=Restricted C=Conditional Use N=Not Permitted 1 A single-family detached dwelling or single-family mobile or manufactured home allowed for caretaker or 0 kennel owner/operator when located on the same lot as the permitted use and is exclusively occupied by the caretaker or kennel owner/operator and family. fi2 These limited uses,separately or in combination,may not exceed 20%of the entire square footage within a Sdevelopment complex. No retail uses shall exceed 60,000 square feet of gross leasable area per building or business. 5 3 In-home day care which meets all state requirements permitted by right. 5 4 Permitted if all activities,except employee and customer parking,are wholly contained with a building(s). 0 IIIIedmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7/02 9 l X • SyKart Zone Change Applicat• 1 • • 5 When an agricultural use is adjacent to a residential use, no poultry or livestock, other than normal household pets, may be housed or provided use of a fenced run within 100 feet of any nearby residence except a dwelling on the same lot. 6 See Chapter 18.798, Wireless Communication Facilities,for definition of permitted and restricted facilities •in the I-P zone. 7 Vehicle fuel sales permitted outright unless in combination with convenience sales, in which case it is • permitted conditionally. 8 Explosive storage permitted outright subject to regulations of Uniform Fire Code. (Not applicable in I-P and I-L zones) 9 Day care uses with over 5 children are permitted subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment in accordance with Section 18.530.050.C.1. The design of the day care must fully comply with State of Oregon requirements for outdoor openspace setbacks. 10 Limited to outdoor Recreation on (1) land classified as floodplain on City flood maps, when the recreational use does not otherwise preclude future cut and fill as needed in order to develop adjoining industrially zoned upland; and (2.) land located outside the floodplain as shown on City flood maps, when 0 the Recreation Use is temporary and does not otherwise preclude allowed uses or Conditional Uses other • than Recreation within the district. The I-P and I-L zones are very similar in many ways. Driving through the areas zoned either • I-P or I-L, it is often very difficult to tell the difference between the zones...particularly because one finds, for instance, outdoor sales in the I-P zone, and offices in the I-L zone. S The main differences are that the I-P zones allows some uses the I-L zone does not, • including: S • Eating and drinking establishments • • Retail sales and services, which are restricted in the total amount of square footage as (� well as the maximum square footage of any one retail use • Repair-oriented retail a ♦ Hotels . ♦ Indoor and outdoor entertainment, and • Offices. • Some uses, such as wholesale sales, are allowed in both zones but are more restricted in S the I-P zone. That is, all activities have to be wholly contained within a building in the I-P I zone. 11 S The I-L zone, on the other hand, allows some uses that the I-P zone does not, or allows only 5 as a conditional use, including: 5 ♦ Outdoor sales • • Motor vehicle sales/rental and serving/repair • Industrial services • General industrial . • Warehouse/Freight movement a 10 edmurphy&associateslhong/zcapp/9/7/02 5 a • • • • • SyKart Zone Change Application • • The I-P zone is not a commercial zone. It still allows light industrial uses, and wholesale • sales. Many buildings in the I-P zone have a combination of office and industrial uses. The 0; I-P zone limits the size of any one retail use to 60,000 square feet. "Big Box Retailers" are • not allowed in the I-P zone. (Home Depot was approved prior to the size limitation). ••• The photographs attached as Exhibit 'E' show the types of uses generally allowed in the two different zones. • Besides the differences in the allowed uses, there are some differences in the development 1 standards. These differences are shown on the following table, which is found in Section • 18.530 of the TDC. 0 TABLE 18.530.2 40 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES STANDARD *tt ,INDUSTRIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL • Pr RK{I Y” r f I L) N • Minimum Lot Size None�' None , Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. i 50 ft. IMinimum Setbacks •1 -Front yard 35 ft. 30 ft. • - Side facing street on corner& • through lots [1] 0 ft. 20 ft. • -Side yard 0/50 ft. [3] 0/50 ft. [3] • -Rear yard 0/50 ft. [3][4] 0/50 ft. [3] 0 -Distance between front of garage &property line abutting a public • or private street --- --- Maximum Height 45 ft. ( � 45 ft. I _ I II Maximum Site Coverage [2] 75 % [5] i 85 % 1 Minimum Landscape Requirement 25 % [6] ! 15 % • • [1]The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2]Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3] No setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning 0 district. 5 [4]Development in industrial zones abutting the Rolling Hills neighborhood shall comply with Policy 11.5.1. . [5]Maximum site coverage may be increased to 80%if the provisions of Section 18.530.050.B are satisfied. [6] Except that a reduction to 20%of the site may be approved through the site development review process. edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7/02 11 S • SyKart Zone Change Applicat• • • • It is apparent from Table 18.530.2 above that most of the key standards, such as the 110 setback adjacent to a residential zone, are the same for both zones. The biggest difference • is the percentage of landscaping required, which is 15% in the I-L zone and 25% in the I-P • zone. • • • • • I b I 0 I r I • • • • • • I • • • • I 41 I r • • • • 12 edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7/02 S • • • . . • SyKart Zone Change Application SUMMARY OF NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING • . • We held a neighborhood meeting on August 15, 2002, after sending out a notice to 34 adjoining property owners and 9 neighborhood representatives. Nine neighbors attended. • No one called for more information either before or after the meeting. No additional comments were received after the meeting. • The primary issues raised by the residentially zoned neighbors were the hours of operation, • the noise levels, exterior lighting, fencing along the property line (there are currently gaps in • the chain-link fence), security alarms going off unintentionally, and storage of gasoline or • other flammable materials. The primary issue raised by the owner of the adjacent office • building was possible vandalism to his building, including spray-painted graffiti, and kids • loitering around outside the racing center. He also expressed concern about the traffic • impact. Mr. Hong explained in detail the operations and management of the business, and his commitment to be of as little impact to the neighborhood as possible. Since noise from • the go-carts was a concern, Mr. Hong demonstrated the low noise level by running a go-cart • outside of the building in which the neighborhood meeting was being held • There were no objections to the proposed zone change itself. • • See Exhibit 'F', Documentation of Neighborhood Meeting • • • • S • S A S S • • • • edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7/02 13 0 • 5yKart Zone Change Applicat1 • • • • • THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK • • • • • • • • • • • • a 0 • • S • • S • S • • • • 0 • • 14 edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7/02 • • 0 O • • SyKart Zone Change Application I COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CRITERIA S • CRITERIA FOR AMENDING THE ZONING MAP This application is for a quasi-judicial zoning map amendment. The standard criteria for • such an amendment are listed in Section 18.380.030 of the Tigard Development Code, as • follows: ' • 18.380.030 Quasi-Judicial Amendments and Procedures to this Title and Map B. Standards for making quasi-judicial decisions. A recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application for a quasi-judicial amendment shall be based on all of the following standards: �► 1. Demonstration of compliance with all applicable comprehensive plan • policies and map designations; 2. Demonstration of compliance with all applicable standards of any provision of this code or other applicable implementing ordinance; and 3. Evidence of change in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to the property which.is the subject of the development application. S The proposed zone change complies with the Comprehensive Map designation, in that the • Comprehensive Plan map designates this property Industrial. The I-P zone is one of the zones used to implement the Comprehensive Plan map. S • The proposed zone change complies with the Comprehensive Plan policies, as follows: • CRITERIA #1 — DEMONSTRATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND MAP DESIGNATIONS • The applicable Comprehensive Plan Polices are as follows. In virtually all cases, the �l Comprehensive Plan treats the I-L and I-P interchangeably. I 2. CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT POLICIES: 2.1.1 THE CITY SHALL MAINTAIN AN ONGOING CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM AND SHALL i ASSURE THAT CITIZENS WILL BE PROVIDED AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE INVOLVED IN ALL . PHASES OF THE PLANNING PROCESS. 10 On behalf of Mr. Hong, Mr. Murphy sent out notices to surrounding property owners and • neighborhood representatives, posted a sign on the property, and held a neighborhood • edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7/02 15 I • SyKart Zone Change Applicat0 • • meeting on August 15,2002 in accordance with the City of Tigard's neighborhood meeting notification process. No one called before or after the meeting to discuss the proposed zone • change or the proposed use of the building as an indoor racing facility. Mr. Hong and two of S his employees attended the neighborhood meeting. • • Mr. Hong has made a good faith effort to inform the neighborhood and the community of the proposed project, and have provided an opportunity for citizens to be involved in the • planning process. Therefore, the application complies fully with Policy 2.1.1. - • 3. NATURAL FEATURES AND OPEN SPACE S • POLICIES . 3.1.1 THE CITY SHALL NOT ALLOW DEVELOPMENT IN AREAS HAVING THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS EXCEPT WHERE IT CAN BE SHOWN THAT ESTABLISHED AND PROVEN ENGINEERING TECHNIQUES RELATED TO A SPECIFIC SITE PLAN WILL MAKE THE AREA SUITABLE FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. (NOTE: THIS POLICY DOES NOT APPLY TO LANDS DESIGNATED AS SIGNIFICANT WETLANDS ON THE FLOODPLAIN AND • WETLANDS MAP.): a. AREAS MEETING THE DEFINITION OF WETLANDS UNDER CHAPTER 18.26 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; • b. AREAS HAVING A SEVERE SOIL EROSION POTENTIAL; c. AREAS SUBJECT TO SLUMPING, EARTH SLIDES OR MOVEMENT ; d. AREAS HAVING SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25%; OR • e. AREAS HAVING SEVERE WEAK FOUNDATION SOILS. • A very small area of the property along the northern property line contain wetlands. • However, the building and parking area are pre-existing uses, and no expansion of either is • planned. There will be no impact to the wetlands as a result of this zone change. The 5 property does not have any of the other development limitations listed above. Therefore, the application complies fully with Policy 3.1.1. • 4. ECONOMY .5 THROUGH ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC CONDITIONS WHICH AFFECT TIGARD, THE • EXISTING MAKE UP OF THE COMMUNITY, THE POTENTIAL FOR GROWTH, AND THE CITY'S • INTEREST IN ASSISTING EXISTING AND NEW BUSINESSES TO EXPAND IN AND RELOCATE TO TIGARD, THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS WERE IDENTIFIED. FINDINGS: S • RECOGNIZING THAT LIVEABILITY IS AN IMPORTANT COMPONENT OF ECONOMIC • DEVELOPMENT, A NEED EXISTS FOR MORE LOCAL CULTURAL AND RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES TO MAINTAIN AND ENHANCE TIGARD'S QUALITY OF LIFE. POLICIES 5.1 THE CITY SHALL PROMOTE ACTIVITIES AIMED AT THE DIVERSIFICATION OF THE • ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES AVAILABLE TO TIGARD RESIDENTS WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS PLACED ON THE GROWTH OF THE LOCAL JOB MARKET. r • 16 edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7/02 . I S • • • • • SyKart Zone Change Application • 5.4 THE CITY SHALL ENSURE THAT NEW COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL NOT ENCROACH INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN DESIGNATED • FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USES. • IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES • 14. THE CITY SHALL ENCOURAGE THE LOCATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMIC • ACTIVITIES WHICH MEET THE OCCUPATIONAL AND EMPLOYMENT NEEDS OF ALL CITY RESIDENTS, PARTICULARLY THE UNEMPLOYED AND UNDEREMPLOYED. 1 •; The proposed use itself will employ about five people. This is not a large amount of • • employment, but it is more than are employed for the current use, which is warehousing • sheetrock. In addition, there are positive economic benefits from the proposed indoor racing • facility, particularly to lodging and, restaurant businesses. The facility is located close to downtown Tigard, and should have a positive effect on the businesses located there. • The proposed use is not exactly new development, since the use will occur entirely within an existing building. However, the proposed I-P zone will offer better protection to the • neighborhood from potential future uses than the I-L zone currently does. Therefore, the • application complies fully with Policies 5.1 and 5.4. • • • 7.PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES • POLICIES 7.1.2 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE AS A PRE-CONDITION TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL THAT: • a. DEVELOPMENT COINCIDE WITH THE AVAILABILITY OF ADEQUATE SERVICE CAPACITY • INCLUDING: 1. PUBLIC WATER; 2. PUBLIC SEWER SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE CITY UNLESS THE PROPERTY INVOLVED IS OVER 300 FEET FROM A SEWER LINE AND WASHINGTON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPROVAL FOR A PRIVATE DISPOSAL • SYSTEM IS OBTAINED;AND . 3. STORM DRAINAGE. b.THE FACILITIES ARE: 1. CAPABLE OF ADEQUATELY SERVING ALL INTERVENING PROPERTIES AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT;AND • 2. DESIGNED TO CITY STANDARDS. c.ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES TO BE PLACED UNDERGROUND. The building is already connected to public water, pubic sewer and public storm drainage, all. • of which have adequate service capacity. If any new utilities are required, they will be placed underground in accordance with City requirements (TDC Section 18.810.110). • Therefore, the application complies fully with Policy 7.1.2. • 8. TRANSPORTATION • POLICIES 8.1.1 PLAN, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES IN A MANNER WHICH • ENHANCES THE LIVABILITY OF TIGARD BY: a. PROPER LOCATION AND DESIGN OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES. b. ENCOURAGING PEDESTRIAN ACCESSIBILITY BY PROVIDING SAFE, SECURE AND DESIRABLE PEDESTRIAN ROUTES. • • edmurphy&associateslhong/zcapp/917/02 17 S • SyKart Zone Change ApplrcatO • • c. ADDRESSING ISSUES OF EXCESSIVE SPEEDING AND THROUGH TRAFFIC ON • LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREETS THROUGH A NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC PROGRAM. THE • PROGRAM SHOULD ADDRESS CORRECTIVE MEASURES FOR EXISTING PROBLEMS AND ASSURE THAT DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATES TRAFFIC CALMING. • 8.1.2 PROVIDE A BALANCED TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM, INCORPORATING ALL MODES • OFTRANSPORTATION (INCLUDING MOTOR VEHICLE, BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, TRANSIT AND OTHER MODES) BY: • a. THE DEVELOPMENT OF AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PUBLIC STREET STANDARDS THAT RECOGNIZE THE MULTI-PURPOSE NATURE OF THE STREET RIGHT-OFWAY FOR UTILITY; PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE, TRANSIT, TRUCK AND AUTO USE. • b. COORDINATION WITH TRI-MET, AND/OR ANY OTHER TRANSIT PROVIDERS SERVING TIGARD, TO IMPROVE TRANSIT SERVICE TO TIGARD. FIXED ROUTE TRANSIT WILL • PRIMARILY USE ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR STREETS IN TIGARD. DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO TRANSIT ROUTES WILL PROVIDE DIRECT PEDESTRIAN ACCESSIBILITY. c. CONSTRUCTION OF BICYCLE LANES ON ALL ARTERIALS AND COLLECTORS WITHIN • TIGARD CONSISTENT WITH THE BICYCLE MASTER PLAN. ALL SCHOOLS, PARKS, PUBLIC • FACILITIES AND RETAIL AREAS SHALL STRIVE TO HAVE DIRECT ACCESS TO A BIKEWAY. 0 d. CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALKS ON ALL STREETS WITHIN TIGARD. ALL SCHOOLS, PARKS, PUBLIC FACILITIES AND RETAIL AREAS SHALL STRIVE TO HAVE DIRECT ACCESS TO A SIDEWALK. S e. DEVELOPMENT OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLANS WHICH LINK TO RECREATIONAL TRAILS. f. DESIGN LOCAL STREETS TO ENCOURAGE A REDUCTION IN TRIP LENGTH BY • PROVIDING CONNECTIVITY AND LIMITING OUT-OF-DIRECTION TRAVEL AND PROVIDE • CONNECTIVITY TO ACTIVITY CENTERS AND DESTINATIONS WITH A PRIORITY FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS. • g. TIGARD WILL PARTICIPATE IN VEHICLE TRIP REDUCTION STRATEGIES DEVELOPED REGIONALLY TARGETED TO ACHIEVE NON-SINGLE OCCUPANT VEHICEL LEVELS • OUTLINED IN TABLE 1.3 OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN. • h. TIGARD WILL SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMUTER RAIL SYSTEM AS PART OF THE REGIONAL TRANSIT NETWORK. 8.1.4 SET AND MAINTAIN TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MEASURES THAT: b. SET PARKING RATIOS TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PARKING, WHILE PROVIDING AN • INCENTIVE TO LIMIT THE USE OF THE SINGLE OCCUPANT VEHICLE. • The development abuts a publicly dedicated street, SW Hunziker, and has an existing • driveway onto that arterial street. The City may require additional dedication of land to • meet current street right-of-way requirements for a "regional access bikeway", in order to accommodate bicycle traffic. The owner is willing to dedicate this additional one-foot of • property for public right-of-way. The proposed use may generate transit ridership. The TriMet bus stop for the #38 and #78 0 bus lines are located on Hunziker Street, directly in front of the site. The applicant will work with TriMet to make any reasonable pedestrian or transit-oriented improvements that will encourage transit ridership. • The site plan proposes setting aside parking spaces for cars operated by disabled persons in accordance with the Uniform Building Code • • • 18 edmurphy&associates/hong/zcappl9/7/02 • S S • • • SyKart Zone Change Application i I This project will meet the requirements of Section 18.810 of Tigard Development Code regarding transit facilities. The Site Plan will also be reviewed by TriMet. • All on-site_parking and circulation will be done to City specifications, although a variance or adjustment will be sought, if necessary, to reduce the amount of parking from the 4.3 spaces/1000 square feet of building space required by the Tigard Development Code for indoor recreation. 0 Therefore, the application complies fully with Policies 8.1.1, 8.1.2 and 8.1.4. r 8.3.2 THE CITY SHALL ENCOURAGE THE EXPANSION AND USE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT BY: A. LOCATING LAND INTENSIVE USES IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO TRANSITWAYS ; B. INCORPORATING PROVISIONS INTO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH REQUIRE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS TO PROVIDE TRANSIT FACILITIES ; AND C. SUPPORTING EFFORTS BY TRI-MET AND OTHER GROUPS TO PROVIDE FOR THE NEEDS OF THE TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED. • IMPLEMENTATION STATEGIES • 4. THE CITY SHALL WORK WITH TRI-MET AND OTHER TRANSIT PROVIDERS TO ENCOURAGE TRANSIT SERVICE FOR THE TRANSIT DEPENDENT POPULATION E.G., THE POOR AND HANDICAPPED. • 5. THE CITY SHALL ENCOURAGE ITS CITIZENS TO USE MASS TRANSIT SYSTEMS, WHERE POSSIBLE, TO MAKE GREATER EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TRANSIT SYSTEM WHILE REDUCING AUTOMOBILE USAGE. • 6. THE CITY SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE TRANSIT PROVIDERS TO ENCOURAGE CARPOOLING AND INVESTIGATE IF THERE IS A LOCAL NEED FOR CARPOOLING IN THE 5 TIGARD AREA. • Many of the people who will use the racing facility will car-pool or use vans or busses, based on Mr. Hong's experience with the facility in Tukwila. People who come as a group — business and non-profit organizations, high school students, church groups, and other organizations often will use private busses or vans to come to the facility, as they want to stay together as a group. In addition, Mr. Hong will have TriMet bus schedules available and displayed in the reception area. Therefore, the application complies fully with Policy 8.3.2. • • 9. ENERGY POLICY 9.1.3. THE CITY SHALL ENCOURAGE LAND USE DEVELOPMENT WHICH . EMPHASIZES SOUND ENERGY CONSERVATION, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION. • IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 8. THE CITY SHALL COORDINATE WITH AND SUPPORT PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PLANING . EFFORTS THAT ADVOCATE ALTERNATIVE FORMS OF TRANSPORTATION SUCH AS MASS p S edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9!7/02 19 p • Sy Kart Zone Change Applicat • • • TRANSIT, CARPOOLING, RIDE SHARE, BICYCLING AND WALKING FOR COMMUTER • PURPOSES. • • Customers may walk to the indoor racing facility, bicycle, car-pool, take a bus, come with a group in a van or bus, or drive their own vehicle. There are several available modes of transportation by which customers can get to and from the facility. Therefore, the application complies fully with Policy 9.1.3. 40 12. LOCATIONAL CRITERIA • POLICIES • 12.3 INDUSTRIAL • THE INTENT OF THE INDUSTRIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION IS TO: 11 PROVIDE FOR THE DESIGNATION OF SUITABLE LANDS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE; • 12 PROVIDE FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT; • 13 PROTECT EXISTING AND POTENTIAL LANDS SUITABLE FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT FROM ENCROACHMENT BY NON-INDUSTRIAL OR INCOMPATIBLE I USES; 14 PROVIDE LAND FOR INDUSTRIAL USE BY TYPE TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT; AND • 15 TAKE ADVANTAGE OF EXISTING TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES. IA INDUSTRIAL LANDS ARE CLASSIFIED AS: • HEAVY INDUSTRIAL LANDS ARE AREAS INTENDED TO PROVIDE FOR MANUFACTURING, PROCESSING AND ASSEMBLING ACTIVITIES. USES WITHIN THIS CLASSIFICATION ARE • CHARACTERIZED BY LARGE BUILDINGS AND LARGE STORAGE AREAS AND AS HAVING 11 ASSOCIATED EXTERNAL EFFECTS SUCH AS SMOKE, NOISE, ODOR OR VISUAL POLLUTION. • • LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LANDS ARE AREAS INTENDED TO PROVIDE FOR MANUFACTURING, PROCESSING, ASSEMBLING AND RELATED OFFICE ACTIVITIES. USES WITHIN THIS I CLASSIFICATION ARE OF A SIZE AND SCALE WHICH MAKES THEM GENERALLY 41 COMPATIBLE WITH OTHER NON-INDUSTRIAL USES AND WHICH HAVE NO OFF-SITE EFFECTS. THE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATES SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY FOR INDUSTRIAL 11 DEVELOPMENT. OVER TIME, HOWEVER, THERE MAY BE A DEMAND FOR NEW SITES. I THEREFORE, THE FOLLOWING POLICY WILL APPLY IN MAKING SUCH DECISIONS. POLICY 12.3.1 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE THAT: a. SITES FOR HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE: • (1) SEPARATED BY TOPOGRAPHY ESTABLISHED BUFFERS, TRANSPORTATION - • OR OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL LAND USES FROM RESIDENTIALLY DEVELOPED AREAS. • (2) LOCATED IN AREAS HAVING RAIL SERVICE, ARTERIAL OR MAJOR 41 COLLECTOR ACCESS. b. SITES FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE: (1) BUFFERED FROM RESIDENTIAL AREAS TO ENSURE THAT PRIVACY AND • THE RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER OF THE AREA ARE PRESERVED. (2) LOCATED ON AN ARTERIAL OR COLLECTOR STREET AND THAT INDUSTRIAL S TRAFFIC SHALL NOT BE CHANNELED THROUGH RESIDENTIAL AREAS. c. THE SITE SHALL BE OF A SIZE AND SHAPE WHICH WILL PROVIDE FOR THE SHORT AND LONG RANGE NEEDS OF THE USE. d. THE LAND INTENDED FOR DEVELOPMENT SHALL HAVE AN AVERAGE SITE a 20 edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7!02 . r a • • • • • SyKart Zone Change Application . TOPOGRAPHY OF LESS THAN 6% GRADE, OR THAT IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED THAT THROUGH ENGINEERING TECHNIQUES ALL LIMITATIONS TO DEVELOPMENT • AND THE PROVISION OF SERVICES CAN BE MITIGATED. • e. IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED THAT ASSOCIATED LIGHTS, NOISE AND OTHER EXTERNAL EFFECTS WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE ACTIVITIES AND USES ON • SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. f. ALL OTHER APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES CAN BE MET. • IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO EXISTING OR PLANNED RESIDENTIAL AREAS • SHALL BE CONDITIONED TO ENSURE THAT: . A. THE SPECIFIC PROPOSED USE WILL BE COMPATIBLE WITH ADJACENT USES; B. THE DESIGN OF THE FACILITY AND ITS SITE WILL NOT PLACE VISUAL OR PHYSICAL • BURDENS ON THE SURROUNDING AREAS; C. THE OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FACILITY WILL BE COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING USES AND INCLUDE[S] CONSIDERATION OF; • (1) HOURS OF OPERATION; • (2) DELIVERY AND SHIPPING CHARACTERISTICS; (3) NOISE; • (4) LIGHTING; AND • (5) OTHER USE CHARACTERISTICS. • The property is located on a collector street, it is level, and is a very adequate size and • shape. The site improvements will ensure that the adjacent residential area is not adversely • impacted with light, noise or other external effects. The topography and existing vegetation • provide a good buffer between the residential and industrial uses. This property, because it • is adjacent to an R-4.5 zone and a residential neighborhood, and abuts other I-P zoned • properties, is more appropriately zoned I-P than I-L. • Therefore, the proposed project complies with Policy 12.3.1. • CRITERIA #2 — DEMONSTRATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE • STANDARDS OF ANY PROVISION OF THIS CODE OR OTHER APPLICABLE • IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE • • The proposed SyKart Indoor Racing Center is within an .old industrial building, which was • built many years prior to the adoption of the current development standards. No expansion • of the building or the site is proposed, nor is any additional paving proposed. The building • meets the maximum height restrictions, and the maximum site coverage. The parking lot is nicely landscaped with existing, significantly sized trees, and the building has direct • pedestrian access from Hunziker St. to the front door of the building. Hunziker Street is fully improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk. • • The site does not meet all of the standards of the I-L zone; let alone the I-P zone. While it • may not be feasible to meet all of the current standards of the Development Code, it will be possible to bring the site closer to conformance with those standards. Further, if and when S • S edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7102 21 • • • SyKart Zone Change Applicat• • the site redevelops entirely, or new development is added on the north end of the parcel, I that new development will be better able to meet all of the current standards of the I-P zone. S S The applicable standards of the development code are as follows: S • Setbacks, front, side and rear • • Height • Building coverage • ♦ Buffering and screening ♦ Minimum landscaping • ♦ Parking Setbacks, front, side and rear. The required minimum setback standards are 35' front, 0' • side and rear, except that a minimum setback 50' is required along the side abutting a residential zoning district. The actual setbacks of the building are 62' front and 359' rear, • with a 53' east-side side setback, and a 32.5' west-side setback. The 32.5' west-side • setback on the side abutting the residential zoning district only occurs at the northwest • corner of the building. We will apply for a variance to the side-yard setback standard to • accommodate the existing building. (See Existing Conditions, Exhibit'A'). Height limit. The height limit is 45 feet. The building is approximately 24 feet high. • Building coverage. The maximum building coverage allowed is 75%. The actual building coverage is only 18%. • • Buffering and Screening. The building is on a parcel currently zoned I-L, and is next to a I residential zone, R-4.5, and the homes that are in that zone. The zoning code would • normally require new industrial land uses to use buffering and screening to protect the single • family homes from any adverse effects of the industrial uses. According to Matrix 18.745.1, • level "E' buffering would be required, which requires a 25-30'-wide landscaped buffer area, • with a 5'-6'-high hedge, fence, berm or wall. I There does not appear to be a practical way to buffer or screen the homes from the existing • building on the parcel, for reasons: • The area to the west side of the building, the side facing the homes, is already paved to the property line, and there is an existing chainlink fence with slats along this property line. • The existing homes are at a much higher elevation (20'- 30' higher just to the lower side foundation of the homes). (See Topographic Map, Exhibit 'G' and Existing Conditions 5 aerial photo, Exhibit 'C' ). 5 I a 22 edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/917/02 5 a I • • • SyKart Zone Change Application S S It would be quite pointless to construct a 6'-high wall or fence, or a 5'-high, 25'-wide berm along the property line with the idea that this would provide any sort of screening. It would not block the neighbor's view of the building, or provide any additional privacy or protection from noise or other impacts. S In addition to the topographical separation, the homes are about 200' away from the property line. The vertical and horizontal distance to the homes provide an adequate privacy and protection from any adverse visual or noise impacts. (Again, the existing building and the homes have been there for many years, under the heavier I-L zone and heavier land uses, and without any buffering or screening. Further, at the neighborhood meeting, none of the neighbors commented on or suggested any landscaping, buffering or screening). S Finally, Mr. Hong does not anticipate any activity on the west side of the building that would ✓ need to be buffered or screened. That is, he does not need that area for loading, parking or outdoor storage, or for any outdoor activities If necessary, we will apply for a variance to . the minimum buffering and screening standards because this use in going into a pre-existing building on the property, the property is already developed, and the difference in elevation makes the buffering and screening unnecessary and pointless. Minimum landscaping: The site does not meet the current I-L requirement that 15% of the site be landscaped, so it obviously does not meet the required I-P minimum landscaping standard of 25%. Currently, 12%. of the site is landscaped, most of which is the area behind the building in the northwest corner of the parcel. To meet the standard, an additional 23,784 square feet (over 1/2-acre) would have to be landscaped. The whole area in front of the building, as well as the area on both sides of the building, is ✓ already paved and used for parking for this building and the adjoining industrial buildings. An extensive area behind the building is also already paved or is in hard packed gravel. (See . Existing Conditions, Exhibit 'C'). While there is some room on the north end of the parcel • (north of the wire mesh fence) to install additional landscaping,it may be difficult to meet the p 25% minimum landscaping requirement. If necessary, we will apply for a variance to the minimum percentage of landscaping standard because of the pre-existing development of the property. . ✓ Parking: The parking requirements in the Zoning Code are intended for a more intensive indoor recreation use. This particular use is not listed specifically in the Zoning Code, but should be considered a unique use, unlike other indoor recreation. For instance, most of the area inside will be devoted to a racetrack. The number of cars that can race at one time, r S edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7/02 23 • SyKart Zone Change Application • normally ten race cars, limits the amount of customers using the facility at any one time. Most people race for only 30-45 minutes. The rest of the facility will be devoted to restrooms, an observation area for visitors, administrative offices, and a ticket sales and waiting area. I There is more than ample parking available for the proposed use. The site currently has 44 a marked parking spaces, including two handicapped parking spaces. (Under the previous approval of the Power Rents plan, the city apparently required a total of 31 parking spaces, including the two handicapped spaces, according to the building plans submitted at in 1997 for the remodeling project. There was no Site Development Review completed at that time). a The zoning code requires "indoor entertainment" to have 4.3 parking spaces per 1000 square feet of building space, whereas a "industrial" use is only required to have 1.6 spaces per 1000 square feet. (At 1.6 spaces/1000 square feet, the previous industrial uses should have had 56 parking spaces available.) The building is 34,817 sq. ft., including the second floor office space. At 4.3 spaces per 1000 sq. ft., a total of 150 required parking spaces would be required. a a More precisely counting the office areas in both the upper and lower floors as office space, which requires 2.7 spaces / 1000 sq. ft. instead of 4.3 spaces per 1000, would still result in 140 required parking spaces. That is, 28,663 sq. ft. for the primary use at 4.3 spaces per • 1000 sq. ft. = 123 parking spaces, plus 6154 sq. ft. as the secondary use at 2.7 spaces per . 1000 sq. ft. = 17 parking spaces, for a total of 140. (If the secondary use is figured at 90%, that reduces it to 138 parking spaces). Aside from the 44 already marked parking spaces available, there is additional paved area on both the west and east sides of the building that could be used if needed. There are also 41 46 parking stalls on the same parcel which are available in the evenings and weekends, which are SyKart's busiest times. In addition, there is parking available in the adjoining a parcels to the south, tax lots 2S1018BC00100 and 2S1018BC 00101, also owned by Knez a Realty Group. There are at least 30 parking stalls already marked and immediately adjoining the proposed SyKart Indoor Racing Center. There is also room for at least 10 cars to park along the east side of the building. 10 Many organized groups arrive in vans or busses, which obviously require less parking than if everyone drove their own vehicles to the site. In addition, the site is directly accessible by , TriMet, which has a bus stop in front of the property. Mr. Hong has a very similar operation in Tukwila, Washington. For that facility, which has a the same size racetrack as the one proposed in a 44,000 sq. ft. industrial building, only I I 24 edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7/02 a • • • • • SyKart Zone Change Application • 28 parking spaces were required. Parking has not been a problem there. There is also a similar facility in Vancouver, Washington. According to one of the employees, counting 2 or • 3 spaces for employees, about 30 spaces is the maximum that are used. • According to a traffic study completed by CTS Engineers, Inc., Exhibit 'I', less than 30 • parking stalls are adequate to serve the needs of the facility. • • Counting the 46 parking spaces available on the site in the evenings and weekends, there are 90 spaces available on the site, with another 30 available on the adjacent parcel. Although that is still short 18 spaces from the TDC requirement of 138 spaces, it is many • times more than is needed based on the traffic study and the experience at other similar • facilities. We will make an application for a variance to the parking standards. • Impact Analysis: Section 18.390.50.B.2.e. requires an impact study as part of the Type III • procedures. Following are comments regarding the impact on public facilities and services: • Transportation System: There are no significant impacts to the transportation system as a • result of this zone change. The traffic study completed by CTS Engineers, Inc. concluded • that concluded that the SyKart Indoor Racing Center "can be developed without adversely • affecting traffic operations or safety in the vicinity of the site." In fact, all intersections in the. • study area would still operate at acceptable Levels of Service (LOS D or better). Moreover, it • concluded that key intersections and roadways in the study area can operate at acceptable performance levels even if the site were developed with 70,000 square feet of office space. That would be a building (or buildings) with twice the square footage as,the existing building, and that was used entirely for offices. • • The traffic report does not mention an important additional point, which is that the proposed use will generate virtually no truck traffic, unlike the current or previous uses of the building. Further, uses allowed in the I-P zone would typically generate less truck traffic that uses allowed in the I-L zone. • Drainage System: No additional storm water run-off will occur as a result of this zone • change. If fact, over time less of the property will be built on than if it remained zoned I-L because of the percentage landscaping requirements in the I-P zone. Parks System: No impact to the park system will occur as a result of this zone change. In • fact, the proposed use provides an opportunity for recreational activity for City residents that • is currently unavailable anywhere else Oregon. • • • . edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7/02 25 S • • • SyKart Zone Change Application • • Water System: No impact to the water system will occur as a result of this zone change. In • fact, light industrial uses generally have less impact on the water system than heavier industrial uses. • Sewer System: No impact to the sewer system will occur as a result of this zone change. In fact, light industrial uses generally have less impact on the sewer system than heavier • industrial uses. • • Noise: The I-P zone generally should be a "quieter" zone than the I-L zone. In the • proposal, all activities will take place indoors. The doors on the west side, the side facing • the residences, will not be left open during operations. The fans for the building will all be • on the opposite side, the east side, which abuts industrial uses. Further, there will be almost • no truck traffic, as most of the users will arrive in automobiles or vans, not by large trucks. The noise from Hwy. 217 will most likely be louder to the neighbors than any noise they i might hear from the racetrack. These are miniature go-carts, with catalytic converters and mufflers, and are not full size racecars. The walls of the building are concrete, which will S stop most noise. The loudest sound produced that will be discernable outside of the building will likely be the fans, which, as noted above, will face east. S • Police. Fire and other Emergency Services: No impact to police, fire or other emergency 5 services will occur as a result of this zone change. In fact, light industrial uses are usually safer than activities allowed within the I-L zone. The proposed use will be similar to the • SyKart in Tukwila, Washington, at which no serious accidents have occurred since it opening three years ago. • CRITERIA#3. EVIDENCE OF CHANGE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OR COMMUNITY... Several changes have occurred in the community since the property was zoned I-L (and M- 3 before that). S • The City of Tigard recently legislatively changed approximately 47.9 acres of land zoned S I-P to Mixed Use Employment (MUE-2), and another 25.6 acres from I-P to Mixed Use S Commercial (MUC). These properties, totaling 75.6 acres, are generally just south of N Scholls Ferry Road, and east of Highway 217. Although the MUE-2 zone is similar to 5 the I-P zone, the I-P zone limits the amount of retail to 20% of the total square footage . within a development complex. The MUE-2 permits retail without such a limit on the , total square footage, as long as no single retail use exceeds 60,000 square feet in size. Similarly, the MUC zone permits retail outright, but without restrictions on either the total square footage or size of any one retail use. S 26 edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7/02 i a • • • . SyKart Zone Change Application S 0 Because those new zones allow almost unrestricted commercial development, they are • essentially commercial zones. Indoor entertainment use, such as the one proposed by • Mr. Hong, will find it difficult to compete for land or buildings within the MUE-2 or MUC 5 zones because the commercial zoning will generally yield significantly higher sales or . lease rates. O • Some of the property zoned I-P have been bought by public agencies for public uses. In fact, of the 773.7 acres zoned industrial, 85.1 acres, or 11%, are now publicly owned. • This includes the School District administrative offices, the Clean Water Services • Agency sewage treatment plant properties, and properties the City bought for parks and 0 open space. . 0 ♦ Subtracting any publicly owned land, there are 688.6 acres of industrially zoned land. Of 5 this, 311.85 acres, or 45.3%, are zoned I-P, 326.71 acres, or 47.4%, are zoned I-L, and 5 50 acres, or 7.3%, are zoned I-H. If the zoning on this 4.2-acre property is changed from • I-L to I-P, the percentage of I-L will be reduced to 46.8%, and the percentage of I-P will • be increase to 45.9%. That is more clearly demonstrated in the following table. .a 0 Table 1 . 10 Impact of Zone Change on industrial lands inventory r • Zone BEFORE ZONE CHANGE AFTER ZONE CHANGE . Acres Percentage Acres Percentage 0 I-L 326.71 47.4% 322.51 46.8% ' • I-P 311.85 45.3% 316.05 45.9% I-H 50.00 7.3% 50.00 7.3% 0 Total 688.58 100% 688.58 100% 0 ID This shows that there is very little net impact as a result of the proposed zone change, 5 especially considering that many of the allowed uses and actual uses are the same. 0 (See Exhibit 'H'for a list of properties sorted by zone and size). • S IA ♦ The building in which Mr. Hong wishes to build a racing center was originally designed in • 1959 and constructed in 1960. Although is has been expanded on the north side, it has . not changed very much since it was built over 40 years ago. Its relatively low and varied • ceiling height (14' and 20'), lack of loading bays, multiple wooden support columns and • other factors make the building less desirable for industrial uses. 0 • The uses allowed in the I-L zone and the I-P zone have become more increasing IP blurred. For instance, there is a lumber yard with outdoor sales in the I-P zone and retail ID edmurphyRrassociates/hong/zcapp/9/7/02 27 I SyKart Zone Change Applicat. W • S sales in the I-L zone. There are offices mixed with manufacturing or warehouse uses. • Many "flex space" developments allow a variety of manufacturing, assembling, repair S and serving, retail sales and services, wholesale sales, warehousing, and offices. It is • often difficult to tell from the outside what the uses inside a building even are, and they 5 may change frequently. The strict separation of uses into either an I-L zone or an I-P • zone, in terms of what goes on inside the building, is not as necessary or as simple as it • used to be. • • ....OR EVIDENCE Of A MISTAKE OR INCONSISTENCY IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR ZONING MAP Typically, a lighter industrial zone border a residential zone. From reviewing the zoning map, Exhibit 'D', it is clear that this is the case. For instance, the residential neighborhood • at the south end of Hunziker Street, served by Fir and Varns Streets, is zoned R-4.5 and is surrounded by I-P and C-P (Commercial Professional) zones. Similarly, the I-P zone has been applied along SW Tigard Street, which also abuts a residential neighborhood zoned R- • 4.5. The same situation exists along SW Durham Road where the residentially zoned • properties on the north side of SW Durham Road abut I-P zoning on the south side of SW S Durham Road. In fact, the only place where I-L zone abuts a residential zone is just west of • the railroad tracks, south of the Senior Center. In this area, the residential neighborhoods • are separated from the industrial uses by a wide wetland and floodplain buffer. • a The only place in the City where R-4.5 zoning abuts I-L zoning, where the actual uses are not physically separated by wetlands and/or floodplains, is the area being proposed for a • zone change. The property was most likely originally zoned industrial because an industrial building was already there. The M-3 zone, applied in 1977, was also most likely applied based on the S existing use, as was the case in 1982, when the I-L zone was established. Had the property been vacant, or had it been used for an office building, like the property adjacent to the south, it most likely would have been zoned I-P. This is evident from reading the staff report 5 and Planning Commission minutes from the zone change application is 1988 (ZC 88-01). 0 That is, a lighter I-P zone should have been originally applied next to the R-4.5 zone, and most likely would have been, had it not been for the existing use. One way to test this idea is to ask the question, what if the property was already zoned I-P, and we were asked for a zone change to I-L? An argument against that hypothetical zone change would likely be that it is adjacent to R-4.5 and single-family neighborhood, and therefore would not be the appropriate zone. That's precisely the point. I-L is a "lighter" S S I a 28 edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7/02 I • • SyKart Zone Change Application S • zone. The types of uses allowed — and prohibited — are more compatible with a residential area than the types of uses allowed in the I-L zone. i Another way to think of it is to imagine that the existing use was already a use allowed in the • I-P zone, but not allowed in the I-L zone — such as an office building. In that case, there • would probably be no hesitation in changing the zone to I-P, again, based on the location • adjacent to the residential neighborhood. (This is precisely the reason used in 1988 to change the zone from I-L to I-P on the adjoining property. The building on that parcel, built in • 1973 under the classification of a "public utility", was obviously an office use. The City • amended the zone to I-P so that the office building would be a permitted use.) • • In the purpose statement of the industrial zoning districts, it states "The location of land • within each industrial district must be carefully selected and design and development • standards created to minimize the potential adverse impacts of industrial activity on established residential areas". • • The zoning map is therefore inconsistent in the zoning of this property. Based on the zoning patterns in other areas of the city, the location of land was not carefully selected in this case, as the property should have been zoned I-P. • The City most likely has not initiated a legislative change to the zoning map because of the existing use, and the desire not to create a non-conforming use and possibly cause. a hardship on the property owner. In this case, however, the property owner is requesting a zone change to a lighter, and in many ways, more restrictive zone. It is an opportunity for • the City to zone the property to a zone more fitting adjacent to the R-4.5, the C-G and the • existing I-P zoning in the area. • S S S S S S ✓ S S S S • edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7/02 29 S • SyKart Zone Change Applicat,• • • • • • • • • THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK • 0 • • • a a I I 0 I 0 S a 11 41 El 41 II • a I I I A a I I 41 I 41 II 30 edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7/02 I a I • • • • SyKart Zone Change Application • • • STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS • • Although the Statewide Planning Goals do not apply to this zone change application, we • note that the proposed zone change is not inconsistent with any of the Goals. In fact, the • proposed zone change is very consistent with the following Goals. Goal #8. Recreation Needs -_.This goal calls for each community to evaluate its areas and • facilities for recreation and develop plans to deal with the projected demand for them. As • mentioned above, Tigard has a dearth of indoor recreational facilities, and particularly for • young people no longer in high school. This facility would provide recreation for families, • business groups, teenagers, community groups and service clubs, and individuals. r Goal #9. Economy of the State -- Goal 9 calls for diversification and improvement of the economy. It asks communities to inventory commercial and industrial lands, project future . needs for such lands, and plan and zone enough land to meet those needs. The proposed indoor racetrack not only provides direct jobs, but also has spin-offs to restaurants, hotels and other businesses. • Goal #12. Transportation -- The goal aims to provide "a safe, convenient and economic transportation system." It asks for communities to address the needs of the "transportation disadvantaged." This proposed indoor race track is easily accessible from the major freeway system and the local roadway system, as well as by transit, walking or bicycling. S • The Transportation Planning Rule also suggests that cities review their parking standards to • reduce the amount of required off-street parking to no more than is absolutely necessary. It . also suggests that cities encourage shared parking between facilities or uses that have off- • set parking demands. • The in-door racing facility has an important side benefit — it teaches people to drive better. Similar facilities are often used for driver's education, where young people can improve their • driving skills. It also provides an outlet for teenagers who otherwise might be tempted to ID use the streets to "test their skills" and compete with other drivers. Better drivers reduce the likelihood of auto accidents, and fewer accidents improve the capacity of the roadway system. • • • • • • edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7/02 31 • • S Kart Zone Change A • • Y 9 PP licati • • i • • • THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK • • • • • • a a S . 5 S I a I a S I I r a I a S I I a 32 edmurphy&associateslhong/zcapp/9/7/02 5 a e • • • SyKart Zone Change Application S • CONCLUSIONS S • ♦ The proposed zone change meets the criteria for amending the zoning map. • ♦ The proposed zone change does not adversely impact the transportation system in the SO area, or negatively impact the utilities or other facilities serving the site and the • neighborhood. • ♦ The proposed zone change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map and Policies. • • ♦ The zone change would not remove any land from the industrial lands inventory. ♦ The proposed use would be an logical adaptive re-use of a 42-year old industrial building. • • The proposed zone is more appropriate adjacent to a residential district than the existing • zone, and is a more consistent with the zoning patterns found elsewhere in the City of • Tigard, and with acceptable planning practices. • • The neighbors did not express any opposition to the zone change at the neighborhood • meeting. . ♦ There will be little if any negative impact to the neighborhood as a result of the proposed use. In fact, with careful attention paid to details such as outdoor lighting and location of S mechanical equipment, and with proper management of the business and maintenance • of the grounds, the impact will be reduced from the impacts of previous uses of the building. • ♦ This proposed site is a terrific location for this type of use, and the characteristics of this old industrial building make it perfect for an indoor race center. • ♦ The proposed racing center will very likely have a positive economic impact on other • businesses in Tigard and the surrounding area.' • • The proposed SyKart Indoor Racing Center will bring a fun, wholesome and safe • recreational activity to Tigard. • • • • • • S S S S • edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7/02 33 • SyKart Zone Change Applicat• • I • • S THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK • • • • • • • • • S I I S S S S S S I S • • I I • S a I • S I 34' edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7/02 5 S S • • •YKart Zone Change Application • • • EXHIBITS • • Exhibit 'A' Tax Assessor's map showing the location and dimensions of the tax lot • • Exhibit 'B' Photographs of the existing building and site • • Exhibit 'C' Existing conditions map • • Exhibit 'D' Zoning Map • • Exhibit 'E' Photographs of uses allowed in the I-L zones • Photographs of uses prohibited or restricted in the I-P zone • • Exhibit 'F' Minutes/record of neighborhood meeting, including sign-in sheet, materials • presented at meeting • Exhibit 'G' Topographic map • • Exhibit'H' List of properties zoned I-H, I-L and I-P, sorted by zone and size • • Exhibit 'I' Traffic Report • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7/02 35 • • • SyKart Zone Change Applicatioir 0 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S . S S S S S S S S S S S S . S S 36 edmurphy&associates/hong/zcapp/9/7/02 S . • •• • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • •• • • • • • •• • 2S 1 188 INITIAL POINT SCALE 1°. ZS I 188 SO KNOLL ACRES 100' N SO.xs'rr •50.15 GEORGE RICHARD SON D.L.C. No 39 sel•V.1 eS9.5 '` �n SPa1rit� I . ,- _,•.i Seo•2°C 2e11 — fe2•s5E h)e Ie°.50 600 ~ 123 I NORTH LINE WILLIAM G'AHAM O.L.C. No. 39 I 1 (� .. 500 400 r .1 301 / tN-• coerce 1 200 10! 103 t 1 "� 209AC. o.cs Me 31 4.10.4C. 3.81 Ac /.B7 AC. •I ...I.CGeNte ,•• .1^ ..V.4 too N1 Im CI1NS IS I 1 I ^1 /•I 700 I' / w l O 211 N J I E I 5M1 74889 jr / 157.27 -1.S. > r . •e S•`11. V E > racolEO IC.S•Na.120291 Y�1 )22/372 Po a`�(Al0 �\ / E>. r1t/ .57.27 , . IS'Y \` 4 2• "r>.,,. P e. a .. " Z,•0.,, Ir:•% _1 800 tr., 3000 I 9 .- �; Is r W f7 r e>T; GREENWAY i1 3, 9- a.3100 G.., �a�1 • V500 '� Jz a� j" l �^, _ r r•>1 9= 2-0 J ;;a4 ,/l •754c. 2> ....1 • II • — —_ — — , ' 156 \ 0 N °S.03� /A . I,• O s J- CD . >2,0 e1 2 Id m O! j ,1 �• 900 3300 ae,• ., v ,..r• .00.73., _ ter` • i' •I t s g 6 4 2 3200 1600 '°'> 'SUM �, SEE MAP I 1'JJ''" f I , l I co. -`)— "2 1 INITIAL PORN 1 ' 25 I 2AA Ti ■ 15c t J6 I o J�/� • TIGAROIA TERRAC iR +).ec• / Hes°15 1100 0 "'.4 Q 1 se" ^ i 1, , .I ° 1000 4A, 1700 2j0'.'t _r \ (�k S# 100 I i /\S •�,r r• 1200 C i J IGr)RD \ ,00 N 1 3h . M a• rl l ..w f�6 _. , ea se>.,3., a ~w�_ _ —__ _ o = I 0, 7800 = a.le z}{� __ — . w I 0. e° z; / ;: °� —— Z —1 1\ 0...\ i0U 9p oN 1801 eo.,e .8�> tesENFNr — _; ___ —_—_._—.——I Z F~— \\ \ eb eo �' • tf�, r ' • 4SQ0 rig s.0 — ro' tessreN7 \ \ J O.a ) / J r / I—'' ..,:i."- . 211.90 1 i u w r \� 'f ro ., 201 1Nn° M 0.00 iuii° 1 1 9s�� '•= \ /a„9c, yo 'SI) 2 11 �i e•.0.•17 \ tp 3 Z 11 \\\\\\. {` . cr w w Y 1 ^o 2202 c o9 •=O 1- $W � �ti SF ° W ° cc e STREET 1 Y °�/� .\ l."1 , I CL 1 N..ay 'aJ"e>y > yB629, 1922 , II .., P''ef•za h' 2200 "eo:3 ° ( I , O •Ia..eJ)Fe 1 s 2300 /c19 AC.• /`/2:/kI{Iw ` , _ 1 _ J I .2/AC. /•,�`�1 1. 1 ly r e i« "o OOw6 h !>, 4,,, 9 >> ..r, u sip. _ c"201 '` ",,,, I ,' r2>>2 ^, /o)a•sE 74 1.03 Ac. 'o1j'se1 ` ;.. _ r .! SEE MAP 7,.. l 2401 /rp • o° 2100 �, 1 L` ---111-2137---.r , I. 25 1 2AD C� ti^ 31 AC o 7 c • 3.51 Ac. C.S.3896 a-°r:3.•r� °j_• .�u2 S. I �•5ti� 7,2,0.j. O N •',..E __ S >_ • + �� 0 28)0 /�/� • C Epy o f C•3iA / i IV�.•/ . o.3 n 7'rAL: /' dr9,e • A . v e j:./ / � l �dY0 iJ7AC. o.2',.-.-A!..3 o.2',.-.-A!..3 cr•• . D • . .. i 1 i II .. Hui."... ....A. .....: A•iii.-.w.• A.priA•xti.Alu ATAA1 , A-••••••-• .i..4. ,,,,1 11,1,Els 4,4 A A 1 A AA-i ii rifi, ....,. .,,. . ..... : . .. . ,....• .: yr. A :.,a a • -•:• ,irp: .or.•:?:-..,:;:::: • .• . . Agir AA.• •• •.. 4 ' .....,):-.1.;.4plik : r' . ... • . .. . .• ---.... . 44144ii, .4 • .. , ': ':::::.:.'....:.;:':'::.::::.:k:.:::;:;:k%;:'::.:.::..:::::.:',..:':•':'::::.:.::*::;:010:::.:.:.::..•.• ...:■„..., .• ,;;;.4:7,.. .1 ,,,„.....„. ........... ......,......„ _. . .. . ..:. ''''11111.11MM "*". .11ffititIVE:vm.•:•:,, View.::%:::.:■-••:::::f.::.....,;(6__.:::::•: ...:::1:::':::::::.f... : ...--'...:••••iti.i.:'' 'r..... .?.!'''': ••'''.......•:•:••••••'••••-•....7=......... .:..............7::....._._....__. ••••...... .::. ...„ ,.„,:,..„..,...4.... ........_......„ . ......z L.: '1.170M I.. ....,_-.-......-7.:-...1: 7t:;;:::...-...:.i •••••••••.•... -.. ' .: •. ... , -7... tt•-.-.. Htnizik- :-. ..--. .-.. . .. .. .L... 1.,./ •,----‘, sli. ppm:lira le-)71 .... •• ... ..... .... „ ........ . - .......... .• .:.,:,:,,, . ... . .. • . rr............, -:. :: IMP' 1.4 *'''''.'"*. .;1'4. ..-..*: .:. • - . . .... ,.. . .._.......:v..... ...,,,, ..::.•I, . -..1 i ,. •••41,?■•10•••••-: ....••:".... ....:..""...,:tif ' ' -:;. „.: .p .,gr. . ...,„, 1.,••.: ii.. . ••••• I i, ,.; . . . „„,3 *.1 ri :. i ,a : -; •••••••-A••• -- 'TA- 7- I • '4,'`$.1.." •'.; 'FFI::!Ire.. ' • i• ”••••i 44:iii. I • •.-• 1,I •••>i' : '.::::::Niie0hat.4,_ ''''''''''''' '.- •I'ingeor,. il • ..„:......• • •/A !. 1 . ...I ••.••••••••• :••••• : . !:A' :::::: .: I • ..:•::::::::, ::::::!: -,. . .......... i ;,, : .1 . 4:* -:::... ';• .,•i.11 ••••••••••••" IF.:'• • •.„, ' ,,11.:11j :: ••.•••:::::::'''''.7.44 ..":14:..tz,..,,,.. :... •• • •• • ":"....; •' •....1:1.. .:-... ••••••••' 41111.:::::.: r'.'".: ":..1, : :••••••:„Ii * *I....".: , *•"••••••••••:•••":••••:•••::::•4.1:****;•••••••• •'•-*,"...77<' *0 .-,'. it . .•:....: ....,,... •:".::;:.:•::::•::..... wt side - . :.......,....,,,,,, ,.,,,„,,......... ,. ..... NM • • . .. • • .. • .• . . ... •....„_:.... • .. west. ... • • • - -....1.- - ;1'4 iii0..;;•AM:4•••••• L X I!'A I 4 i-"I, • *I- l'..* ** *4.- L., . • „ii,..,....:.,.• :.: ...... • ••....,v. ..!•4: •., ..::::.......„.......„.4,, e,.,,,,c..,,A sijii m 1 u 411 . a ,- ..,......... •:: . NM Urn RIR!?A A .• . _ . ......A.A."-Arlt. "A.::::.,• .• .. . . ;.; °4::F::::;;Ai...• gq . ••JJ,:: ...t,I.J.v.::::.• JJ_ ... •• .. .... •,....; -, ; •- AAA••••::: :•,........... • A- • Ailorwvt r•:.•::.:vit:.::•:!...-.•••..5 •A•pA.AA ..••• •••-•,-,•••A ••AA.,•A •-• ,,,,/ A- ,1 A. 1, A • • • • - tiall :.:.....,!.•-•: - - A A••••••••-;1 . • I. .,-;`,,... • :•,..:A: ,A. .AAA. . .,.. .:. ...... . .... • . .. .-,.. • . .. .. • / '..•'.' . ir..q.:. ....... • • ..!...:......r.:*. • • • .::'.:::11. ....::::;:.. . M ... ';'•' • '}.......!-....,.......',..•••:•*•.;* •• • ...'..1.•''.... ....t.:,....• ...,<W...•,:..0 :I....1.T.... .:... )14 • -. •• ZI cr '•!..„ .. •••,....., r IL-••••.-•-,:,..,•,.:: I••••:.•:,,,,.•1 • ,...,•••,„,;•":,,.1.1 :: J.:."1::: J.1 li 1 i•::`,J.Jf sg:1•14.11 •••• R li. J.:1 1 1 F-1.' ..., •JJ: J....\•••,,J. 11,A Ail,1,1; :1 1,J::...t..J....l'....:, ..1.... :JJ1....J. •,....A1 ,..., .::. ,..J.:J......1 t:Lt.,J.,"„,,, .......$. R ', , , ,',.., P. . CD. . ...:h.,H.:,HI (..,,....f.:.....y.. ...,....::.:. ilon..../.... r:...-. ..... .. ... . r a,.. .. :7€.x •• ;.x. ..x.. . .. ! {w' a. . • Z is .is vr•All.• ,. . ....: . " ,'„ems •t% :101.04,0:,„:...•.•,.,",.....:009,.,:........,...:0..::.•:,.:•..:::.•:...:0.,.:...0 .........4,....!1'..r,t.'1,..,,. .. s „.„F:4.1,..1., ;.:..1.1i4.fi...i.:t,••,,...** ! Cis :, �� yJ�. ,,��,• ti , 3:. • ' ...i.i....!..•:::••....4'.J.. : / . • .x ., kx. x • 4 . fr. x . • w • .- 4. # v' - ....::.... ....:..... M • .: <.:.rttij !.... •••••••; .! . � ' ;: • rt:pt.•:,•'..10.1..::.... ......„ „.. q g • • w .\a, O 1 .. .i.i..a .: :: V# •.. .:. .. k t3 .. .::. ..R • <g > x x ml \ ”x..:m x•x t . .x • w '14!.f.!::.•. .***"'f..••• C/""' • ' Cr 44 ....::.... k,T i �• Y :Moo '...:'e':J'::'II .e.e:.� .. 3 }F., A:• ei';ev,,. ::.: :{ .� ....:.:iii" :i • .. k. '. '• •:' .le. . : :` iti r y a: :.E. • !• �.,. 1•: : •' .4?, • ,.*** * ...T., • S • :e.x. 1,...... ,.:,. . ,.. .. • i I:. •x • Iti• y ieiiv' :i • •.11.iii• : i ..,' 1aiii r • i •• A.tie::� v . : e ':e • • • • N • b , < . ,.. y• ...... r i9 A . . r— ..... it hi 1 ,..••I • .e.> x Qm ..Yn.x..w M. '1,'' 1 1 1........:::...• 41 r.: i •. • .'. •••.•••.... .....' I .. • • ' . • i . . . . ... . . . l••: i!..:' -•, ; • c ,., 'f :r .,•. ,• , 1 • : • . ...... :: •• • ,• • 1• X - . '-. ... -:, ' • ' I . •li . A —.. . . . ..= .. •„. ::* i...: 1: US ' ' ''r . ' 3. • • • • . ,4,4,- .•.• . . ..,t 4... • . • --- '-' ' s *.i . .s. > .• .;., . ...,„ ' , ,,,4 .... :..• .• ! . • I.,'• : : . . . .. . ie 1 •, . 1 : . .... !•'•••: • i• ' i•..<: V...... . ... 4 . . . ,•'• ,•'•. . •••• • •••• •••• . 4, '.. ..... . .. • .4 1 ,4,,4•4. • ,..4........■ ,.. ' ••••,,,, . .••• • •••,,,,,. a 4 4 4.4.4, .n, .,..4, • 4.' 1 \ i •'., : M.4 . 1 .. . W im, I.--. ....1 •• —. : ' I 2, '.1 . •• 1.-...• - . . , • i I.?.• . ; : .I .Y. ; : , .,, :: - .,, i• 1 . t...._.....—....j.„......i' ) . „..., ••• • .....1 1 • '1 : u.• • : , f..-....... I ,.. ...i... ... . .1.4.....--. : ,,, . • . .•:•. . ••. E 4...5. -." i . . . ' et • 4......... % . . . . . . ., . _. . i•.. . ,• ... i .., . ,., i•7; : t . 0 . • . . . • • g • g 3 1 : ...--44....v..... .. ,..... ...,... ....i'4 i . .• .'• 4. . . . • '•• . , : . g•---•7 II :egg•.:77,.. •..,..,••!1—# :: • •' .:• ...:...." .. :«44•:. • : .'''''..'...• •i...1,..:<:. c•E 7.• -••• •••••;•••••• : 4.4 ..1/4 - • .,•...-: —: ., 1!....:, ...•.;..'1 , ‘ .. ..; . : .. . .. ----. ,..... •- ""•-•,• . • . •,.... ; ••,..,.... . ..,, /// • ; . • .1 F.-4,i 1.. ; ii./.... .. . ••••••••••••••••• . . • ... ... \ .::::::, . ••••••— / / .. / • • „...._ •e•): .. .. . ..... ,-, .1 . • i ; ..../ / .. . .. se :, • • . . 11'7 41171•V'' ' • ' • 1 i•P'''•: . •'''. \ •'2 ...•'•• •.: . . ' 't,..... l'':•,.... ••- '''..!. F.. 7: 17 .7 • ''- —7.• •••• . • / . . . ... : • ,•• .../ .,_ , . . , . • 1 i 1.,i.,.. . i4,„....t..i.,71:... . . .... . „,7 . , L......, ,,,,,,....::„...7:,... •..t.„.... ,..••-••:::,.r.,.• ,,,....44 ''''''.••'.:::.•;-,..,...••;:.:,.,,,i:"•••• :• :: : 11-1-0:-1 :i• ....,;,.,.., . •:.,.....,,...,,.....:.•:::•:..:4:4....::,,..:i. :1:•:..4.• . : :. :. •. ... . :...,: . „: • .. . .. 4.. • ••.:1-i..' . i. "-1,....i ' "47'7 .. . ,.. . . , . i •••• • ' 7. . • i"7" 4 . ,"70.... 7c.'„„,,i.." . • . 7. .. . ,: .,.t. . ... .. . x , 1 . . " ..i. . ..4. .. <rt .: q . : • L._ \• 1 ia•• '.' ..../ : °F •i. .' '- . .—•-'1.,''•'. .' • .' .. . . .„ •.• .. ...v. '3.. i.' . , • i i .: —.Li. ',• j. • •••,..., '..' ?...'•</. .,-•—. ° ""44 ' • :f'... ..1:•:'' I:, F. .-- . 4-1' - ......„--..m•- • 4.4.-• : ,........ ../0-4 ,.., r"—•i .J..1.:::::' :,., . .• ...: ,. ....• . . •••. :••••• .. .•,... ---.:4., _ • . . . ., ..: .. • ..,.., .••• • . • ::• 1.'N 1 ''. ' • .. .•ir .,A.,,..• . . ..;:` ... . A. ....„0..„,...„ ....„ .„„ „,....... : . .„....: • •:• , •K :— I ,,,;,....c. I•• ') •' •••44'•••••4 ' . . .. ,4 • . .• .. . . ... , '`'. k I -:•.'• l',. • .4 .4i1 ....:"'it'• 4 ' ^ .... i" •'. ; ..*** .. • it—****"":•"1---•*•*•*•*°°•T''''''''•;"•""lv-1' I l'.... 1..4 1.• •11,0,,,,,,, „, L• n.,, g . . ------ g g — g —g— — — 0 • 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 • • 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 _. . . 10 1 4 111 i 4 I ( I • • I 1 0 . (Iit ,,III Iiei: 0 0 4: ' :'::$ 'f::::::. RIRRRR. RR: ,....„ 1 IRR'Jr„ /*:••••q•,...R R :ii..:).11, • .A.ppliRs:16,r1 • . .. • . . . •• • • .•• . . .. . . .. . . . • :•RtR: .:„.. RRIIRK •• • ,. . . ....42..ir R ..R.r..,.4....-.: • '. :: - . .::.; iLf., ' , • • • •Rsi-RR R4 • RR..;.„- grIrlr,„ R,0* RR7:4::=RRRR R:RR-RRR:4;,:4.:.:- '. 5.: a • -.:•:._- ...li:-./.7-..,..::: ::...e:.... .. .• „,,... . . . •:. *et ii Ze%. 6.. ' T •lia ar-r :::..i. ....• .1., • •• • , %. a ..........s.: . •:*.:;:.-a' :** a: i• a a si ::. -: .. : • --:-:. s : r•ii:.1.1!:ay, a - . ••1 : r.,.7... .;a;,. m.,, %,iltits •• • ...... , :,....... • . R. ...i *a'• :iw,...R.. .....R....... , ... .R-0-- ..•.Ril===!*...:.A:RR,: c C 1 • R... , ... '..i. .-.;:.;.%::.: -•.. ,.! ! '.atl j;.:.....',.•::r: : liaill- 71 N...a"..: .: • .. .. :. .., .. . .. • ............•:•••: . ...... . Iiii .,..A,,t'..: :sa . *** irc.4"."*"*."0091%, . :-. -7-'....t.,aavol-• *'...a, - 1 .....*ticialar.)92:.' .. • .. ....* . .....„...i. .... _ . .....-et- ..• • •......... . ••., 1 L 1.7 i • r NI g .. .•-•4 i I 1::. ,•• :... . e.i. .$ . ,........, p. .'i't.:•.:•1 • **::::n•:-.... f, • ...•• I ,... • • : • *** - : :*- :i.:i:;:::::.:i.:::.:.; ' '.......: . . .. . t•i.,' . ..,,,....i:11:•:".., ... .•••:. .• ,, • : '•*•'.••::I'..4.: ' %,:.: . :: ... . •*4 64* • 41 . - '''‘.:'-:.-7:'1!..1' , -'[4,4.:lift 1:111111:11.1.1 111.111.;.: .61L:111,i,2 1:1,1 ii ...:.:.:: . ,?i,. .:3:;:.,1:•., ,.. .... .••• .4.' i% .! . •••• . i"..:'-k#Tti4:1L.; • 4 ''''...n%en: ktiL :-': '_... 14:: t: ..! :!:-.'".7.t. .• .••• , •1 '.. 4 : ja,7-.......,;,...: ••••••• f 1:::. ':' • : 4. RR- ,,... :: ,„,_,..„R Riz,,:......., ... :, RR, , •-R.:••••..:::, • •'''k,' • RR. - • • R ,= ..R. . ::; tr:T. . .,.:... ','4: 1 :... ......• .' 'pi.,44elfr"it.'41.: .d. .. ... • • •-:::," 4,41:411::.,......, . a •. ' '::',...*-::1:..... :''.• .. . ,•:::• ........ 0 ,..;,;/....4,....,. : ." ., • if-? ;b ei -.. .4 Viiii‘mkg it apit -•=-4. •4! .......':...,.., ..,,,,,, :„. . .. ,. ,. • ,•.•i: : , , . :•:. .,,,,,,,...,,,;• . 4 A • 4 ,....4.,.,.,:t.,. k'''..,,,. fie,....p. - .• o•.9„.., . . . • •,...,...1.,... :-.--.41,. : .,,/..,,A , , 1 r ,,,...uiric,....... ....nr"..: . "7--...r.......-...r.-- r-..-....4„:„.„-:-,-,--..t.a* •-• owe# .. fili t II. , ,,.14,11 !fit",f PlIft"11: i•—•'...k r r - . ..;1'k. . i i• . EL..., - i.„,outtaisr • .......: • '1,0... . • .`/,),":411.S. .: .> :- „...,.. '. ....:fig° .,.. 1 - . . 0. 1 •i 1 1. .';i:;, :.. 4„. , :14.. • . 11.1.1111.1111111.14 -,...,,,ai ...............000•011di m : . ....:' : ! ..5•:„,.. .-i . •• . , x1 .... „..... ••• • •,A 1.......4 .t-t 11- ri:t: ..4.li t.',11111 in,'''11 1. —'...... P1111111111(.11;1111 N11.1. 1.11, 'L. ‘"'• cr MOM IP, ow rini.:,,II:1:tirri.v.. ,..,*,.:;1:,::.....:0:• '..,.,>:•rion.....vc pi.....::-.cio.,.. ,x,.7::.i Y2 D i a 10 4 r • 4 ID 0 _, A * ,Al . , . $. ,+:1: 44.41 :f.-- . .„ ...... . \:,1...ot Al P: 1 ..: -.... r ,•• 44.i... ......, T. c.,) ..-e7:,...b.ivi;0, '..f. .';.....'S .. . ., , f.,. ili,..,- '. '',' •:::--..-p",..1,;.!, : -.... .. . , 4.. ..i ..e. • v . , .. . ..____ .. . . . . . rri.W. '...•........... . . — . . . •...... ..• . . ... .-..‘fr ' .r-3): •''' J.4....,.`" ,.---... fi'....f.. j', .7.• .'... .„s ..x..r. .'''.',..;....i.... -777-7'15::: i:.' ' . . .......... . ' , .:::•0".1 1. .- . .. '.. .-..'":::-111:1: ' :: . . • -_-:!: . . :•'-,4.4......:. '• - •,.-.-- -. . . . • ) s', , .,. .,......,1.„eat .. .„. ,. , . . . •• •• _AlE4,7 -7-. oft—iiiiii 7 . • .. . — .... . 7.7..•,c: s ? • . .. , . i i...;'". ." .. i s• -7.7. ......,:::.;•. ...' 1 7... - •-• . . . .. ..:: ... ..,. . .. . . „........ 0., 1, 741 . ..r t Bt. ' ...... . --, : •, ....... . .. . ...• .. . .. . .. .,-,•-.!..-:.,...' li ..:'M• . "...A . "4.1'. :•ii:' I : ONO_.: ', '-'*"' it a... .... ...: . „.. . . . . .. ... , : ... ... . . . . , - ' .. ... .... ....t.. - -.4. ........e.,;e.r■At.::...,:ek....• ....',.:.:.‘-' *ti'''"^"... /tie lt&IR eft 1. a...1s''. ............:.:::::::.... . . . ::::::rgil ............ :::::::::.i'::'...............:;'....:.....::::,:::::':::::......,iii,:ii.i.:::::„:1;;,;:::::1111:::;:::.:::.!:::Pilitlhikel.:+7.,..+.+:+ ...:',.," .. i;.1%.- '', '.., '4:• -, . - """. ..,.... ... ...;.,,,-..:::...: :„.,,,.....,. .. : , ... A.,...,....,..„...... • -,:.,•:..,. ,,. .•,:.... . . . , . 1 1 .1 • .: ...., . .-i, ...• 4.,.. -.. • . . ... . . . . 1 . .. ... i, „ . . .N.1/24r— '<117!"ji:t.1..e.."..“ ' ...`...:::;,.. , -I-4 4,..,,.. ."-.4 "...I- :: -... ... •0, 44.4 -,-, - ... . ! ,-.•,., ".s..„Z.j.:44,,,ttv 4-.10,/...-1,. . : ....:: I. •Iir,: . 4.....:::: _......,:-1 : . :: .11,..„-:::..1.......,.:.,......4 -..... • ..: - ,[g.,, .. .. r. . : ... ... r4.: :. - : -Air: • • • Exhibit `F' • • • NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE • Land use application for property at 8205 SW Hunziker St. • " • The lessee of the property at 8205 SW Hunziker Street, Mr. Yun S. Hong, intends to apply for a zoning map amendment for this property from Light Industrial (L-I) to Industrial Park (I-P). Prior to applying to the City of Tigard • for this amendment, Mr. Hong would like to discuss the proposal with the • surrounding property owners and residents, and any other interested citizens. • You are invited to attend an informational meeting on: • THURSDAY, AUGUST 15, 2002 7:00 P.M. • CITY WATER BUILDING (RICHARD BROWN AUDITORIUM) • 8777 SW BURHAM STREET, TIGARD • • Explanation • Mr. Hong intends to apply for a zoning map amendment from Light • Industrial to Industrial Park on Tax Lot 25101 BC00200, a 4.2-acre property at 410 8205 SW Hunziker Street (see attached maps). The reason for the proposed zoning map amendment is that the I-P zone permits "indoor recreation"; while the L-I zone does not. Mr. Hong desires to develop a "SyKart Indoor Racing • Center", similar to one he has operated in Tukwila, Washington for the last • three years, at this site. The racing center and related offices and conference • rooms will be entirely within the existing building. The racecars are actually • little go-karts, outfitted with catalytic converters and mufflers. The proposed • SyKart Indoor Racing Center will bring a fun, wholesome, recreational and • training activity to Tigard, and make great use of an old industrial building. • Before submitting the Zoning Map Amendment application to the City of • Tigard, Mr. Hong is required by the City to hold a neighborhood meeting to • explain the proposal to interested citizens and solicit their comments. (Please • note that this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City.) If you • have any questions, please come to the informational meeting, or contact me at • the phone number, mailing address, e-mail address, or fax number listed below. • • CONTACT: Ed Murphy, Planning Consultant, Ed Murphy & Associates ADDRESS: 9875 SW Murdock St., Tigard, OR 97224 • PHONE NUMBER: 503.624.4625 • FAX NUMBER: 503.968.1674 E-MAIL: ejmurphy @aol.com • • August 1,2002 • • • • • • • • • SIGN-IN SHEET • SyKart Zone Change Proposal • Neighborhood Meeting August 15, 2002 • • • NAME ADDRESS PHONE / 9e9/97• `,.2//(,/ S „ z�Ai /Ia5'Sj /S��`-/..�the Silo ��inl e f C(/f�- ( 5 -Y7 • 44(1, 4/e/` 14)ii4- (2 ) z ze:--3 3o\ /575 Kevn4 j6:5 Q53) - (030 5 2 )axmA 5 / 25 ./ 9yif rc. • 1 �5 i2-- t CIMA r. (54 Y zi 3 - 32 56 • \cf' Ariole .a■cc-) e.7 • • JOLJ,\J ����.�-r !_ g�s� Sid voJzoyi.A0, cis 69- `),OS-6 • • � `��c ����o,'c�S \ 3`V) . tea`\ r • lGO; _� 11 [f tG3 /h VIA('l/ • • MlOti - �;t cr-o 12iiz d gbh i:/DW • • • r.-4 14t4.111 cpf75 s w it/40404c S)L, co 3 . 42q-z/ 25 • • • • • • • • • edmurphy&associates/hong/neighbormtg/sign-in/8/15/02 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . i ‘. .. •. • CITY of TIGARD \ .., •.. ., .—... . .,... ,.„, ., . . , • • • •.. • AREA NOTIFIED • . . • : • . .• . • ( 00' ) .••• • • . . • • .. . • • ..• • . . : • .. »»/0)00 • • • • . . • • . . „Ar FOR: Er d Murphy . • v, . . , . . , „ . . . . •4••••... • : ..• • . , '.. • • . RE: 821„:35 SVV Flunziker v vdrhuu .. • , • • ...„......._____________ ......._ Ut(06•CU.111C i(\\\•\'\ ' , ,\:;.•'s \--"-....'‘''' • . ' . . .4.•.4.,:::::....... .. ?.....,ItilHOLULIK .::—.....4...\,...:., . . . . . .. . . ., :q..1.111s.c.1111g110 ..., • 1:::`\.::::•:N . .• : — . 7st.mr.c1 kw, : • . . .:s,Twenrivm • •:. .,,,. , ... • 1..X.:...,•::`..,:,,,'..-... .....:1 • .....—> IS.I.V.Ret.i'Mrl• .,,•:•*:?: •11."'8‘4"k1•41 A•,.....:;:,',.\::.„,‘,''•••*r : .. • . tttlef;11;7103.: n*Itt.i.i.ii6 • • 1:iT.Itik".4113,1f.) .. /slur:corm .,,,'.•\..-.-...\•\,,:•-•„:::N.':::-‘\\...."...:...:.". 11'°5acel"°' .. •*""'•'°"•''' ••• • tsitilu.elp•Ell .. ":,:.........::::::::•.....,:<\.'N .) . •. . Property oyvner information ;. 3SKI.:81.: VIDO 1SWI8C{'IM f\'•.:***1 ffilio:Tr■04•< • is valid for 3 months from • .• :PS°3`gt"'" • 1..-. .\\\••.\•....:::...... ••••••"••••'s•••:::i . ' •... . ../SIOIRMIOni. . • the nate printed on ads rnap, • nommen m•••‘...„,.:,.:-.. •••:.x...1":„.• . • • •• .•""illtdc.imloa \\*-.......::::4.. . . • . • . . . : • .. f'SICIE.13:74.11. • Iti4111.7.00,01 ..... ',.., •. . T.:141BC:173fit? • . • • . • . .... . • . . ... .....: tgittq3C01100 •(..4;' • •:',...••••••••:' :. • . •• • •• . . ... .... . • /1101tet40).00 '.. • . . • .. • . • •741:114Cr;rtul. • . • •• . • 231.(ngeGilDE ..' • . . •• • • • . *. MA/00020 . . • • . • • • . • • . . •• . , . • . • Illin•lea2ACI ' • •.. .• , . . . ..• • • . • mairtenn .. . . .. •• • . picescimor . . • • • • ,.• nia49.C.V.Afgi .• . . . . • • • • . • • . • • • . . •••••• ..,.• • • •, • • imit ''•-'. •. • 11, :t.S.€01NeCIM **, • • . • • . • . l'SVIc4.125t A. • • • • . ri •‘ • • • • • • , . . ..• . • . .. •• . .. . • • . . , u•0000 . • . • . . : • • A . . .••• : • . . '01' .. • . 4 ,,, • • .. • .0 • . • • • • • • . . • . • • I..3...Pme• Jni 2':.. :PM`,.(l.mad•a:.*MM., ,•ns..di'a• • v • � I • 0 2� • 0 44 (Hit.t* • Iry iiiii to e' q"DEN P L el • • WV• F Proposed Zone Change from I-L to I-P':111111401, . J I Iiiiitt; . ' • " i �� � ti III j III" / N • • ‘, 1 0 X90 4 r— I I ri CI TY OF TIGARD ZONING MAP ,� 8/01/02 ;fir - IYJ a R. • 2S101BC-03000 •• unie7 Cc0wL T v nnno L-k€ • ROBERTS DAVID $18c SW$41 w71I6R,140 12361 SW KNOLL DR • T TIGARD,OR 97223 • 0 2S101BC-02202 2S101BC-02800 III LEACH DOUGLAS SEVERSON JAMES A&ROBIN 0 8430 SW HUNZIKER RD STE 200 29404 SW HEATER RD • • PORTLAND,OR 97223 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 • 411 2S101BC-02300 2S10100-00700 • MCCARTHY KELLY E&JANICE L SMITH GERIG WESTERN PROPERTIES L 13705 SW FARMINGTON RD PO BOX 930 • BEAVERTON,OR 97005 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 . • • 2S1018C-01801 2c12 0, . Ank MILLER LORI M lip 8365 SW HUNZIKER RD PG„DO 8 . TIGARD,OR 97223 Wu SnNVII I F 70 • • 2S101BC-03100 3640.111179=371 0 NGUYEN VUONG P& VO PHAN 4414.2.5-5Y1117ItL • 12387 SW KNOLL DR TIrTADr\!ID 07P31 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 410 2S101BC-01100 2S101BC-00201 • NITSOS STEVE TOM& WESTEC AMERICA INC BETTY MAXINE 8255 SW HUNZIKER • 8465 SW HUNZIKER RD TIGARD,OR 97223 • TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S101BD-00300 2S101BC-02900 • PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING GROUP IN WESTPHAL EDGAR A&PATRICE M • 208 E WOODLAWN RD 1811 NW 93RD PL STE#200 PORTLAND,OR 97229 • CHARLOTTE,NC 27217 . 2S101BC-00301 2S101BC-00103 . REED WILLIAM C WETLANDS CONSERVANCY INC THE PO BOX 12564 PO BOX 1195 • PORTLAND,OR.97212 TUALATIN,OR 97062 • • 2S 101 BC-03200 2S 101 BC-01200 • REID CHARLES 0& WILDER GEORGE C&LUCETTE A • RUTH A 8445 SW HUNZIKER ST 12435 SW KNOLL DR TIGARD,OR 97223 • TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S101BC-02201 2S101BC-01500 . ROACH MICHAEL A AND PAMELA S WILLIAMS PORTUS W AND SARAH T 1111 956 WEST POINT RD 12390 SW KNOLL DR LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • • • . • • 2S 101 BC-02100 2S 101 BC-01900 • • ANNAND JOHN D II&EDNA N DELAO ALICIA& • 8260 SW HUNZIKER RD DELAO SANTA CECILIA& TIGARD,OR 97223 GARCIA ERNESTO • 8335 SW HUNZIKER RD TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S101 BC-01800 2S101130-00301 • BEAUDOIN MICHAEL E& EAST SIDE VAN&STORAGE INC • DONNA R 4836 SE POWELL BLVD 12490 SW KNOLL DR PORTLAND,OR 97206 • TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S101BB-01500 2S101BC-02200 • CALWEST INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS LLC HHO&B ASSOCIATES LLC • BY DELOITTE&TOUCHE LLP BY H&A CONSTRUCTION CO 2235 FARADAY AVE STE 0 PO BOX 23755 • CARLSBAD,CA 92008 TIGARD,OR 97281 • ..26+91135-411180 - 2S101BC-02501 • @ .L'/ET LAIIDAA O�„ie� LICI n HUTTIG INC • ( - !I P 14500 SOUTH OUTER 40 RD . 2 0 CHESTERFIELD,MO 63017 8 • • 2S101BC-00400 2S101BC-00500 CARASOF ALEX S&LILIYA V KIM KYONG SUK • 12330 SW KNOLL DR 12300 SW KNOLL DR • TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 2S101BC-01000 2S101BC-02401 CLICKENER ROBERT R&PATRICIA A KING JAMES F • 13855 SW PACIFIC HWY 12650 SW HALL BOULEVARD • TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • .218G00SO17 2S101BC-02700 KING JAMES F • Y PO BOX 23819 • TIGARD,OR 97223 • • agA94eCz0900 2S101BC-03300 KISH ROBERT J/SUSAN C • Y 7510 SW ASHFORD ST • TIGARD,OR 97224 • • 2S101BC-01600 2S101BC-00100 DALTON LOIS KNEZ JOHN S SR&JEANNE M • 12420 SW KNOLL DR 8185 SW HUNZIKER RD • TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 2S 101 BC-01700 2S 101 BC-00200 . DEFOE JUDITH A MCGEE& KNEZ REALTY GROUP LLC DEFOE CHARLES E JR 8185 SW HUNZIKER ST STE A • 12455 SW 68TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 • • •, • • • • • Jack Biethan • 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 • Tigard, OR 97224 • • Sue Rorman • 11250 SW 82nd Avenue • Tigard, OR 97223 • • Naomi Gallucci • 11285 SW 78th Avenue • Tigard, OR 97223 • • Michael Trigoboff Ai 7072 SW Barbara Lane • Tigard, OR 97223 • •▪ Dieter Jacobs • 7775 SW Spruce Street • Tigard, OR 97223 • • • Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard • Tigard, OR 97223-6210 • • • David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place w Tigard, OR 97223 • • • Nathan and Ann Murdock • PO Box 231265 • Tigard, OR 97281 • • Brad Spring • 7555 SW Spruce Street • Tigard, OR 97223 • • • • 'TY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: April 18, 2002 • • • • • • • MINUTES • SyKart Zone Change Proposal • Neighborhood Meeting • August 15, 2002 • • • The meeting started at 7:00 P.M. Nine property owners attended. Representing the • applicant were Yun Hong, along with two of his employees, Luke Vasquez and Joshua Jones, and • his planning consultant, Ed Murphy. John Knez Sr. also attended as the property owner. The • • other attendees are listed on the sign-up sheet, attached. • Mr. Murphy explained the purpose of the meeting, and the process for a zone change. He • explained that there would be a separate application for Site Development Review and some • • variances on parking and landscaping and possibly other requirements of the I-P zone. He • distributed information sheets comparing the I-P zone with the I-L zone in terms of allowed uses • and standards for development. • • Mr. Hong presented his proposal for an indoor race center, and explained how the one he • has in Tukwila has been operating for the last three years. He talked about the typical age of • • participants, how corporations use the facility for retreats and team-building, and how organized • groups, from High School students to Firemen to Service Clubs, use the facility for special events. He said there would be no on-site food service, but that groups could have lunch or dinner catered. • • He said there would be vending machines available. Mr. Hong said that there would probably be ID four full-time, and four part-time, employees. He said no alcohol would be served, and that he • would not let people who had obviously been drinking drive the go-karts. He mentioned that the • • building was handicapped accessible, and that they had race cars that were specially made for • people with disabilities. Mr. Hong said that near-by restaurants, hotels and other businesses • would benefit from having a SyKart in town because it is something for their customers to do for • • entertainment,and because it attracts customers who may spend the night, dine, or go shopping. • • • • edmurphy&associates/hong/neighbormtg/minutes/8/16102 1 • • • • • • • • Discussion items included: • • • Exterior lighting on the building. • • Hours of operation • • Noise from race cars • • Trash around the grounds, and potential vandalism to adjacent buildings • • Kids hanging out outside the building •• ■ Fencing along west property line(there are some gaps in existing fencing) • • Transients or homeless people using the property • • Burglar alarms going off accidentally • • Operational questions about maintaining the go-carts, how much fuel they carry, where the fuel • will be stored, how fast the go-carts go, etc. • Mr. Hong presented a video of a television news-cast regarding the SyKart in Tukwila, • Washington. He also ran the engine of one of the race cars out in the parking lot,just outside of • the meeting room, so that the neighbors could get a sense of the type and level of noise that the race • cars make. • • Summary. • The neighbors who were at the meeting did not object to the zone change,and in fact, could see the • benefits of being next to an I-P zone instead of an I-L zone. Their questions were almost entirely • related to the proposed use of the property for an indoor race center. They generally seemed very • satisfied with Mr. Hong's responses to their questions and concerns. The meeting was cordial, • informative and positive. • The meeting was adjourned at approximately 9:00 P.M. • • • • • • • • • • edmurphy&associates/hong/neighbormtg/minutes/8/16/02 2 • ,.......,,...,,,....,/ ! ca /4 , 1-------:----"---... rr Exhibit ‘G -..... • • ,, • !If /,.., __„.......... , . 0..0. "..,/ _........,...... . _ '774. 7 Xx,77 , . . ........ ....._..... , _ xxx....../...4.../ .,/. .4_,Ii \A'.1."ZI'I\•-•-' It\,c,..,. \ \\ \ I,- Ir i I ......4..../.../.5 .--- - \`' f • \'''.\\I \ \\,,.. '4\.. 4 „.........1"-"..A."- t ...., \ \ ....; ....i X if it ji kitiliti..f.1,1111/11111'ill:1111 11 ... ' I'5°2 ' i * / - .... • I _. /;., f /.... //I ;i I it ' 1... i 1 1 ! 1,.. 1 t 1 1 r II I f i i if if 4 At i 1 1 I of/I of 4 . . 1 1 f / III ,1•66.6 7 ...// Ill I 1 , 171:1 i 1 i i f I I 1 1 1 t if 1 . . . { , 1 i 1 If/ I 1 . i I i I Aft, i 4 1 i I IMF • 0 1/1/ - •01 411 1. '4\'‘. \ 1 I N \ I / ; 111111,iiik,,444)7( I 1 4`• \ . \ I d i , f f i * i i 4 i i f 1 1 f 111 1 14i/ 1 f i 1.4.1 ' f f , 17X,SX 77 I i 1 I 1 I I i i i I 4 01-4-...- 1 I ' I 4../..—id:4_, ..//.., . 4„-•54,4„ w.Q. 11 e I i ..t‘e.... .....'," ./ ... ... . , • II I r I •::::-.4' 't 11 1 i e e'''''',....„......., / s ' ,........ , i,.•> ; .. 1.. 1:';' /. I:// / ..--•-• , 0 .1 „-' „... . ..-t',....-..- .''' 0"—il ....-- . .„..- • 7 1 . . „ . .- . . , 0 iii..i 1 ... '. ' 'Z....:"..." "."-..'''''',.. '' • //777.. '77:777 ..'4'7//4iXnt77 . . . 0 . .. . ,.../ ...... '/ .. ra"...."...:„.::„..,/ ."'"...;-:,;:•.... ."'( . '-..-''. \ ..."/ ... i. i .. „... ......•-• .... t....11 - 0 '.`"...-..,.:*"......... ., .' „...-". :7.. .A X• 'X ' / X/s,„‘„,X •X,. ',..... . • • • • 0 • • • SyKart Zone.Change Application • Exhibit 'H' • • PARCELS IN TIGARD ZONED INDUSTRIAL • (EXCLUDING PUBLICLY OWNED PARCELS) • • Tax Lot ID # Site Address Acreage Zone Vacant? Subtotal • 25101 DC00900 13935 SW 72ND AVE 0.49 I-H NO 2S101 DDO1000 13955 SW 72ND AVE 0.56 I-H NO • 2S112AB00200 0 0.81 I-H NO • 2S112AB00100 0 0.92 I-H NO • 2S112AB00300 0 1.09 I-H NO 2S112A600500 7300 SW LANDMARK LN 1.20 I-H NO • 2S112AB00600 14101 SW 72ND AVE 2.47 I-H NO • 2S112AB00700 0 2.52 I-H NO 46 2S112AA00400 14280 SW 72ND AVE 4.23 I-H NO 2S112AA00300 14200 SW 72ND AVE 5.00 I-H NO • 25112AB00400 7400 SW LANDMARK LN 5.00 I-H NO • 2S112AA01000 0 5.05 I-H NO • 2S101 DCO1100 7298 SW TECH CENT 5.28 I-H NO 2S112AA00900 14140 SW 72ND AVE 6.50 I-H NO • 2S112AB00800 0 8.90 I-H NO • Total I-H 50.02 2S112AB01700 0 0.02 I-L NO 2S112BA05901 0 0.09 I-L NO • 2S112AB01600 7455 SW BONITA RD 0.10 I-L NO • 2S112DD01701 0 0.11 I-L NO 2S112BA06100 0 0.13 I-L NO • 2S112AC00100 14529 SW 72ND AVE 0.19 I-L NO • 2S101 DD00700 0 0.21 I-L NO • 2S1010000701 0 0.22 I-L NO 2S112BA05800 0 0.29 I-L YES • 2S112DC01800 15785 SW 72ND 0.29 I-L NO • 2S113AB00100 0 0.29 I-L NO • 2S112ACO2500 0 0.30 I-L NO 2S112AB01100 2234 SW FERNWOOD CIRC 0.32 I-L NO • 2S113AA01300 0 0.32 I-L NO • 2S112DC01700 0 0.33 I-L NO • 2S112DC01200 0 0.34 I-L NO • 2S101BCO2900 8254 SW HUNZIKER ST 0.36 I-L NO • 2S112AC00101 0 0.42 I-L NO • 2S112DD01900 0 0.42 I-L NO 2S113AB00400 0 0.42 I-L NO S 2S112DD01800 0 0.52 I-L NO • 2S112ACO2200 14835 SW 72ND AVE 0.53 I-L NO III 2S112BA06000 0 0.53 I-L NO 2S112DD01700 0 0.53 I-L NO • 2S101BCO2500 0 0.57 I-L NO • 2S112AB00900 0 0.58 I-L NO • • 2S112AB01000 7225 SW BONITA RD 0.58 I-L NO 2S113AB00500 0 0.59 I-L NO • 2S112AD00401 0 0.61 I-L NO • • edmurphyandassociates/hong/zcapp/chart/9/4/02 1 IIIIP • • 11 SyKart Zone Change Application • • Tax Lot ID # Site Address Acreage Zone Vacant? Subtotal 0 2S112BA05900 14050 SW MILTON CT 0.61 I-L NO • 2S101 DD00900 14010 SW 72ND AVE 0.66 I-L NO • 2S112DC01100 0 0.68 I-L NO 2S112BA05801 0 0.71 I-L YES • 2S112AC01900 14945 SW 72ND AVE 0.76 I-L NO • 2S112DD00300 15900 SW 72ND AVE 0.78 I-L NO • 2S101BD00302 0 0.79 I-L NO 2S112DB00900 0 0.80 . I-L NO 40 2S112ACO2000 14915 SW 72ND AVE 0.81 I-L NO • 2S112ACO2600 7320 SW BONITA RD 0.83 I-L NO • 2S112DD00400 15960 SW 72ND AVE 0.84 I-L NO 2S112AC01000 0 0.86 I-L YES • 2S101BCO2700 0 0.94 I-L NO • 2S112ACO2100 14865 SW 72ND AVE 0.96 I-L NO • 2S112AB02000 0 1.00 I-L YES 2S112DC01300 15930 SW 74TH AVE 1.00 I-L NO • 25101 BD00104 0 1.06 I-L YES • 2S113AA00500 0 1.12 I-L NO 2S113AA01100 0 1.14 I-L NO • •2S101 DC04100 0 1.20 I-L NO • 2S112ACO2700 7340 SW BONITA RD 1.25 I-L NO • 2S112AB01200 7235 SW BONITA RD 1.28 I-L NO 2S101BCO2800 8250 SW HUNZIKER RD 1.36 I-L NO • 2S113AA01000 0 1.47. I-L NO • 2S101 BD00101 12805 SW 77TH PL 1.49 I-L NO • 2S102DA00100 12970 SW HALL BLVD 1.49 . I-L NO 2S113AA00200 16520 SW UPPER BOON 1.49 I-L NO • 2S112AB01900 0 1.52 I-L NO • 2S112AC01801 14965 SW 72ND AVE 1.56 I-L NO • 2S112AB01800 7415 SW BONITA RD 1.57 I-L NO 2S112AC01100 14860 SW 74TH AVE 1.64 I-L NO • 2S112AC00400 7380 SW BONITA RD 1.69 I-L NO • 2S113AA00700 0 1.69 I-L NO 2S101AC01800 0 1.84 I-L NO • 2S101 BC00103 HUNZIKER ST 1.87 I-L YES • 2S101 BD00301 8015 SW HUNZIKER RD 1.87 I-L YES • 2S112DD00500 0 1.90 I-L NO 2S112AC00200 17010 SW BONITA RD 1.95 I-L NO • 2S113AA00900 16500 SW 72ND AVE 1.97 I-L NO • 2S113AA00800 0 2.04 I-L NO • 2S101DD00703 13950 SW 72ND AVE 2.13 I-L NO 2S112ACO2300 0 2.15 I-L NO • 2S112AC01800 0 2.16 I-L NO • 2S101 BD00300 8015 SW HUNZIKER ST 2.28 I-L NO • 2S112AB01300 0 2.43 I-L NO 2S113AA00600 16120 SW 72ND AVE 2.51 I-L NO • 2S 101 BD00105 0 2.57 I-L NO • 2S112DB00100 0 2.72 I-L NO • • edmurphyandassociates/hong/zcapp/chart/9/4/02 2 • • 0 • SyKart Zone Change Application • • S O Tax Lot ID # Site Address Acreage Zone Vacant? Subtotal • 2S112AC01500 14980 SW 74TH AVE 2.76 I-L NO • 2S113AA00100 0 2.84 I-L NO • 2S113AB00300 16075 SW UPPER BOON 2.93 - I-L NO • 2S112AB02300 0 3.00 I-L NO 2S112AA00500 14344 SW 72ND AVE 3.40 I-L NO • 2S101BCO2401 12560 SW HALL BLVD 3.51 I-L NO • 2S101 BC00101 8185 SW HUNZIKER RD 3.82 I-L NO 2S113AA00400 16200 SW 72ND AVE 3.83 I-L NO • 2S113AA00300 0 3.88 I-L NO • 2S101 BC00100 8185 SW HUNZIKER RD 3.98 I-L NO • 2S101 BC00200 8205 SW HUNZIKER ST 4.20 I-L NO 2S112DB00300 7257 SW KABLE LN 4.25 I-L NO O 2S101 BD00103 7895 SW HUNZIKER RD 4.39 I-L NO • 2S112AD00501 0 4.96 I-L NO • 2S112DB00401 0 4.98 I-L NO 2S112AD00500 0 5.42 I-L NO O 2S101 DC04000 7500 SW TECH CENT 5.61 I-L NO • 2S113AD01900 0 5.75 I-L NO • 2S113AB00600 0 5.85 I-L NO 2S113AB01201 16505 SW 72ND AVE 6.13 I-L NO • 2S101 BD00200 8001 SW HUNZIKER ST 6.26 . I-L NO • 2S1010001201 7920 SW HUNZIKER DR 6.32 I-L NO 2S1010000500 12600 SW HALL BLVD 6.41 I-L NO 2S113AD01800 16798 SW 72ND AVE 6.61 I-L NO 2S101BCO2501 8100 SW HUNZIKER ST 7.57 I-L NO • 2S101 DD00800 14410 SW 72ND AVE 7.86 1-L NO 2S102DA00600 13360 SW HALL BLVD 8.03 1-L YES III 2S112AA00600 6713 SW BONITA RD 8.22 I-L NO • 2S1010000700 8200 SW HUNZIKER ST • 8.41 I-L NO • 2S112DC00100 0 8.46 I-L NO 251010001202 7930 SW HUNZIKER ST 9.78 I-L NO O 2S1010001400 0 11.37 I-L YES • 2S112DC00200 7342 SW }CABLE LN 11.44 I-L NO • 251010000600 12700 SW HALL BLVD 12.54 1-L NO 2S112DB00400 0 15.97 I-L NO • 2S1010001200 0 26.32 I-L YES • Total I-L 326.71 1S135CB00100 0 0.00 I-P NO • 1S135CB00800 0 0.00 I-P NO • 2S101 DC04500 7555 SW TECH CENT 0.00 I-P NO • 2S112AD01100 0 0.00 I-P NO 2S113AB01600 0 0.01 I-P NO • 2S113AB01000_ 0 0.06 I-P NO •. 2S102AB01802 9460 SW TIGARD ST 0.10 I-P NO • 2S102BA01190 0 0.16 I-P NO 2S101BCO2300 12530 SW HALL BLVD 0.21 I-P NO • 2S102BB00300 10080 SW KATHERINE ST 0.23 I-P NO • 2S112AD00400 0 0.28 I-P NO i • edmurphyandassociates/hong/zcapp/chart/9/4/02 3 • • 0 • SyKart Zone Change Application • • 0 • Tax Lot ID # Site Address Acreage Zone Vacant? Subtotal • 2S102BA01201 0 0.29 I-P NO • 2S102BA00400 9780 SW TIGARD ST 0.30 I-P NO • 25101 BCO2100 8260 SW HUNZIKER RD 0.32 I-P NO 2S112AD00200 0 0.32 I-P NO III 2S112AC00500 0 0.33 I-P NO • 2S102BA00390 0 0.35 I-P NO • 2S102BA00900 12160 SW GRANT AVE 0.35 I-P NO 1 S135CD01100 0 0.36 I-P NO • 25101 DD01100 0 0.37 I-P NO • 2S102BB00201 10060 SW KATHERINE ST 0.42 I-P NO • 2S102BA00500 9760 SW TIGARD ST 0.43 I-P NO 2S102BA00901 9570 SW TIGARD ST 0.43 I-P NO 0 2S112AD00301 0 0.49 I-P NO • 1S135CB00500 11555 SW TIEDEMAN AVE 0.53 I-P NO • 2S112DB00200 0 0.56 I-P NO 2S113A800200 16045 SW UPPER BOON 0.56 I-P NO • 2S102AB01901 0 0.58 I-P NO • 2S102AB01800 9460 SW TIGARD ST 0.61 I-P NO • 2S102BA01100 12220 SW GRANT AVE 0.64 I-P NO 2S114AA00300 16295 SW 85TH AVEN 0.65 I-P NO • 2S102BA00600 9730 SW TIGARD ST 0.69 I-P NO • 2S112DA00600 0 0.70 I-P NO 1 S135CB00300 11445 SW TIEDEMAN AVE 0.74 I-P NO IP 2S112DD00700 15750 SW UPPER BOON 0.74 I-P NO • 2S112DD01500 0 0.78 I-P NO • 2S112AC00700 14605 SW 74TH AVE 0.86 I-P NO 1S135CA00700 11225 SW GREENBURG RD 0.87 I-P NO 0 2S112AD00300 6830 SW BONITA RD 0.90 I-P NO • 2S112DC01600 15575 SW 74TH AVE 0.90 I-P NO • 2S101 BC00201 8255 SW HUNZIKER ST 0.92 I-P NO 2S112AC00800 14645 SW 74TH AVE 0.96 I-P NO • 2S101BCO2202 0 0.98 I-P NO 5 2S113B000400 8100 SW DURHAM RD 0.98 I-P NO 2S102BB00100 9930 SW TIGARD 0.99 I-P NO • 25101 DD00702 0 1.00 I-P NO • 2S101 BCO2201 8300 SW HUNZIKER RD 1.05 I-P NO • 2S112AC01600 14975 SW 74TH AVE 1.05 I-P NO 2S102BA00800 0 1.07 I-P NO S 25101 BCO2200 8430 SW HUNZIKER RD 1.08 I-P NO • 2S102AB01801 9440 SW TIGARD 1.10 I-P NO • 1 S135CB00600 11530 SW TIEDEMAN AVE 1.18 I-P NO 2S101 DD00300 7100 SW SANDBURG ST 1.18 I-P NO • 2S102AB01900 0 1.23 I-P NO • 2S112DA01100 0 1.26 I-P NO • 2S112AC00900 14775 SW 74TH AVE 1.27 I-P YES 2S1026A00301 9914 SW TIGARD ST 1.28 I-P NO III 2S1 13B000500 8168 SW DURHAM RD 1.29 I-P NO • 2S101 DD00401 6955 SW SANDBURG ST 1.35 I-P NO S 5 edmurphyandassociates/hong/zcapp/chart/9/4/02 4 • • 0 • SyKart Zone Change Application • • 0 • Tax Lot ID # Site Address Acreage Zone Vacant? Subtotal • 2S112DA01000 6610 SW CARDINAL LANE 1.36 I-P NO • 2S113AB00101 16101 SW 72ND AVE 1.38 I-P NO • 2S112DD01601 0 1.45 I-P NO • 1 S135CB00100 0 1.46 I-P NO 2S1026A00303 9800 SW TIGARD ST 1.64 I-P NO • 25101 DD00200 SW SANDBURG ST 1.65 I-P NO • 2S112AC00600 7440 SW BONITA RD 1.67 I-P NO 1S134DD00102 0 1.75 I-P NO • 2S101DC03800 13730 SW 72ND AVE 1.76 I-P NO • 2S112AC01700 15065 SW 74TH AVE 1.76 I-P YES S 2S112DA01300 6640 SW REDWOOD LN. 1.79 I-P NO 2S112AC01300 14905 SW 74TH AVE 1.83 I-P YES • 2S112DB00500 15115 SW 74TH AVE 1.84 I-P NO • 1S135CB00400 11535 SW TIEDEMAN AVE 1.87 I-P NO . 2S112DC00701 15951 SW 72ND AVE 1.98 I-P NO 25112DC00500 15875 SW 72ND AVE 2.02 I-P NO • 2S112DA00300 15230 SW SEQUOIA PKWY 2.12 I-P NO • 2S102BA01000 9540 SW TIGARD ST 2.34 I-P NO • 2S102BA00302 9900 SW TIGARD ST 2.42 I-P NO 25101 DC04603 7405 SW TECH CENT 2.43 I-P NO 2S102BA00501 9740 SW TIGARD ST 2.43 I-P NO . 2S102BA00304 9820 SW TIGARD ST 2.46 I-P NO 25101 DC04601 7477 SW TECH CENT 2.47 I-P NO aP 2S102AB01902 9380 SW TIGARD ST 2.49 I-P NO • 2S112DD00200 15714 SW 72ND AVE 2.52 I-P NO II 2S113BA00200 7800 SW DURHAM RD 2.58 I-P NO 25112DB00600 15205 SW 74TH AVE 2.78 I-P YES Ill 2S112DD01400 0 2.79 I-P NO • 2S112DA01200 15060 SW SEQUOIA PARK 2.83 I-P NO • 25101 DC04602 7291 SW TECH CENT 2.87 I-P NO 2S112AD01100 0 3.00 I-P NO II 1 S135CB00700 11440 SW TIEDEMAN AVE 3.27 I-P NO M 2S113AB00700 16255 SW UPPER BOON 3.36 I-P NO 25101 DD00100 0 3.48 I-P NO 2S113BA00100 7420 SW DURHAM RD 3.55 I-P YES • 2S114AA00200 16285 SW 85TH AVE 3.61 I-P NO • 2S112AD01000 7007 SW CARDINAL LN 3.71 I-P NO 1 S135CC04000 9905 SW TIGARD ST 3.87 I-P NO • 2S112AD00700 0 3.88 I-P NO • 2S112DC00201 15845 SW 74TH AVE 3.94 I-P NO • 2S113AC00102 0 4.00 I-P NO 2S112AC01200 14865 SW 74TH AVE 4.03 I-P YES IP 2S112ACO2400 14655 SW 72ND AVE 4.19 I-P NO IIII 2S112DD01600 15575 SW SEQUOIA PKWY 4.27 I-P NO • 2S112DD00701 15800 SW UPPER BOON 4.48 I-P NO 1 S135CB00200 10250 SW NORTH DAKO 4.49 I-P NO • 2S112DC01500 15615 SW 74TH AVE 4.61 I-P YES • 2S112DB00700 15245 SW 74TH AVE 4.65 I-P YES 41 • edmurphyandassociates/hong/zcapp/chart/9/4/02 5 • • • • SyKart Zone Change Application • • 0 • Tax Lot ID # Site Address Acreage Zone Vacant? Subtotal • 2S112DA00700 15115 SW SEQUOIA PKWY 4.76 I-P NO • 2S113AB01400 7300 SW DURHAM RD 5.39 I-P NO • 2S112DC01400 15865 SW 74TH AVE 5.41 I-P YES 2S113AC00101 0 5.54 I-P NO 2S112DB00800 15515 SW 74TH 5.60 I-P YES • 2S112AD00600 14750 SW 72ND AVE 5.66 I-P NO • 2S112DA01400 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY 6.68 I-P NO 2S113AB00800 15995 SW 74TH AVE 6.70 I-P YES M 2S112DA00800 15055 SW SEQUOIA PKWY 7.76 I-P NO i• 2S113BA00400 7632 SW DURHAM RD 10.39 I-P NO • 2S112AD00900 14800 SW SEQUOIA PKWY 11.14 I-P NO 2S113AC00103 0 11.78 I-P NO 0 2S1010001100 0 13.21 I-P YES • 2S112AD01200 6750 SW BONITA RD 15.99 I-P NO • 2S1010000800 0 24.37 I-P YES Total I-P 311.85 • d • Total Acreage 688.58 688.58 • Before Zone Change • Total Acreage I-H 50.02 7.3% • Total Acreage I-L 326.71 47.4% Total Acreage I-P 311.85 45.3% Total Acreage 688.58 100.0% . • After Zone Change Total Acreage I-H 50.02 7.3% 0 Total Acreage I-L 322.51 46.8% • Total Acreage I-P 316.05 45.9% • Total Acreage 688.58 100.0% I III • Data Source:City of Tigard GIS,August 26, 2002. Analysis by Ed Murphy • • . . . • . r • • • edmurphyandassociates/hong/zcapp/chart/9/4/02 6 • • 74NsPORTAT? I'J 17flPAC1T 5T1JVX • • • • • Exhibit `I' • • • • • SYKART ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION • • • TRAFFIC ANALYSIS • • • • • • • • • r • • I • • • • • PREPARED FOR : • yun S. Hong • Sy Kart Indoor Racing Center • • PREPARED BY • • CtS Engineers, Inc. • • • SEPTEMBER 9, 2002 • • • • • • • • • 3300 NW 211th Terrace • Ct S Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 Tel[5031 690-8080 Engineers, Inc. Fax[503]645-5930 • E-mail:cts @ctsengineers.com • CIVIL • TRANSPORTATION • STRUCTURAL • LAND SURVEYING • September 9, 2002 Project OR02.035.T01 Tigard Sykart i lb Mr. Brian Rager • City of Tigard 41 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, OR 97223 SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis for the Proposed Sykart Indoor Racetrack located at 8205 SW Hunziker Street in Tigard, Oregon • Dear Mr. Rager: • • Based on your request, I have performed an analysis of the traffic impacts of the proposed Sykart • Indoor Racing Center in Tigard. This development will reuse an existing building (formerly Power Rentals) on the site that has a driveway onto SW Hunziker Street. The site contains one building of approximately 34,777 GSF. The proposed use will require the applicant to rezone the site(4.20 acres) from Light Industrial (I-L)to Industrial Park(I-P)to permit the proposed indoor entertainment use. This traffic analysis includes an assessment of the traffic impacts of IP developing the site under its existing zoning, with the propose rezoning (assuming a worst case land use-offices) and with the proposed Sykart Indoor Racing Center. Based on the results of these analyses, it is concluded that the proposed Sykart Indoor Racing Center as well as the • worst-case land use scenario can be developed without adversely affecting the traffic operation or safety characteristics of the adjacent street system. Specific findings of this study are as follows: • 41 • Based on observations at similar facilities, redevelopment of the site with the Sykart Indoor Racing Center is estimated to generate approximately 20 trips during the weekday PM peak • hour. (This facility is not opening during morning hours on weekdays.) If the site was developed with offices uses (worst-case land use under proposed zoning), this would generate approximately 104 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour. • • • In the future, all intersections in the study area will operate at acceptable Levels of Service (LOS D) or better for all scenarios evaluated. Major traffic movements at the intersection of SW Hunziker Street and the site's access will operate at acceptable LOS C or better. • Observations at the existing intersection of SW Hunziker Street at SW Hall Boulevard and SW 72nd Avenue did not reveal any traffic safety or operational problems that need to be addressed by the applicant. • No specific off-site improvements are necessary to accommodate traffic generated by the • development of the site with worst-case land uses or Sykart Indoor Racing Center. The following paragraphs document the study's methodology,results, and major findings. • a S S • 110 • . • 2.035 Tigard Sykirt . , e September 9,2002 Page 2 110 III O PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Ili Figures 1 and 1A show the vicinity and the proposed site plan. The applicant is proposing a e Sykart Indoor Racing Center, which will reuse an existing 34,777 GSF building. This project O will remodel the Power Rents Facility previously at 8205 SW Hunziker Street. The site is currently zoned I-L (Light Industrial), which does not permit indoor entertainment uses. 0 Consequently, the applicant is proposing to rezone the site to Industrial Park (IP), which permits O indoor entertainment uses. The proposed development will use the existing two shared access IP driveways. II STUDY AREA . 10 * Based on discussions with City staff, the impact of this development must be evaluated at * intersections along SW Hunziker Street at SW Hall Boulevard/SW Scoffins Road and at SW 72nd Avenue, as well as at the site's access driveways. O 5 AREA CONDITIONS O Study Area Land Uses ID Land uses in the immediate vicinity of the site consist mainly of industrial uses. Sharing the 0 site's two access driveways are Knez Building Products and another office building. South gacross from the site is the Centrex Construction Building and the Foundry Industrial Park. OP Site Accessibility lb Area Roadway System Figure 2 shows the approximate location of the proposed Sykart Indoor Racing Center and the 0 surrounding roadway network. The main roadways in the study area include SW Hunziker Ill Street, SW Hall Boulevard, and SW 72nd Avenue. Table 1 presents the characteristics of these * roadways. 111 Table 1: Summary of Study Area Roadway Characteristics S On- IIII Street Name Road Width Posted Side- Bike (Feet) Speed walks Class Lane Parking kig 41 . SW Hunziker Street 2-Lane Major Collector 0 (at Site's Access) 36 35 Yes No No O SW 72nd Avenue 2-Lane Major Arterial NB 60 25 Yes No No (at SW Hunziker St) w/CLT&Bike Lanes SB 53 le SW Hall Boulevard 2-Lane Minor Arterial NB 39 . II (at SW Hunziker Street w/CLT&Bike Lanes SB 45 30 Yes Yes No /SW Scoffins Road 110 0 0 0 0 III 0 lb • , • � 2.035 Tigard Sykart• • September 9,2002 Page 3 • • Pedestrian and Bicycling Considerations Few pedestrians or bicyclists were observed during our intersection volume counts. In the • immediate vicinity of the site,most street sections have sidewalks on both sides of the street. The • site already has sidewalks along the north side SW Hunziker Street, and curbs and gutters on • both sides of the street. Bike lanes are present on Hall Boulevard and 72°d Ave and the travel lanes along SW Hunziker are wide enough for shared use between bikes and motor vehicles. • • Transit Considerations • Tri-Met operates bus routes 38 and 78 in the vicinity of the site. The nearest bus stops for routes 38 and 78 are at SW 72nd Avenue approximately 93 feet south of SW Hunziker Street, along SW Hunziker Street approximately at site's access, and 172 feet west of SW 72nd Avenue. The • number 38 route runs north and south along SW 72nd Avenue to/from the Mohawk and 0 Martinazzi Transit Center and to/from Boones Ferry and Kruse Way. The number 78 route runs 40 along SW Hall Boulevard and SW Hunziker Street to/from the Beaverton Transit Center and the Lake Oswego Transit Center. • • Existing Traffic Volumes and Peak Hour Operations STraffic Volumes A A reconnaissance of the site and its vicinity was conducted. Traffic volumes within the study 0 area were obtained.from actual weekday PM peak hour traffic counts conducted in August 2002. The Sykart Indoor Racing Center will not be open during the weekday AM peak hour, and thus, this time period will not be analyzed for this study. Traffic volumes at the site's access were • estimated from these counts and driveway counts from a prior traffic study. Figure 3 shows IP these PM peak hour volumes obtained at the key intersections. Traffic volumes greater than 25 • were rounded upward to the nearest five vehicles. These data reveal that the afternoon peak hour occurs between 4:35-5:35 PM. This study considered traffic conditions during weekday PM peak • hours, which represent reasonable "worst case" traffic conditions within the study area. Overall, i• less than 5 percent of vehicles observed were large trucks. • Peak Hour Traffic Operations iTraffic conditions at key intersections in the study area were analyzed during the PM peak hours. 0 ' Intersection operational analyses were conducted using the procedures in the Highway Capacity • Manual (HCM 2000) for evaluating signalized and unsignalized intersections, which describe • the traffic operations of an intersection in terms of its Level of Service (LOS). For unsignalized intersections, the intersection's LOS is stated relative to the most critical intersection approach or • maneuver, typically the left turn from the minor street approach. For signalized intersections, the • LOS is a function of the average vehicle delay that vehicles on all approaches experience. The • LOS criteria range from "A," indicating little or no delay, to "F," indicating that drivers • experience long delays. The LOS worksheets for the results presented in this study are attached as an Appendix to this report. City of Tigard and Washington County standards require that all 41 signalized intersections operate at LOS D or better and unsignalized intersections operate at LOS • E/F or better (if a signal is not warranted). Table 2 (on the following page) shows the calculated • existing LOS for the key major study intersections based on the peak hour traffic volumes shown in Figure 3. These intersections operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS C or better). • • 0 A 1111 ® • 2.035 Tigard Sykart• • September 9,2002 Page 4 • Table 2: 2002 Current Levels of Service • Intersection PM Peak Hour • Signalized Intersection Avg Vehicle • Delay(SecNeh) _ V/C Ratio LOS SW Hall Blvd/SW Scoffins Road/SW Hunziker St 24.8 0.75 C SW Hunziker Street/SW 72nd Avenue 29.2 0.81 C Minor Street Stop Control 0 Avg Vehicle Delay (SecNeh) LOS • SW Hunziker St/Site's Access Driveway 13.6 B • Critical Leg: SB • • Traffic Safety 0 Accident records for the most recent three years of available data (1999-2001) were obtained • from the ODOT Crash Analysis & Reporting Unit. They were examined for existing traffic • safety problems at all the major intersections in the vicinity of the site. Figure 4 shows a • summary of these data and the location of reported traffic accidents. All the intersections in the al study area had accident rates that were acceptable (i.e., less than 1.0 accidents per million entering vehicles). These data revealed that the roadway section in the immediate vicinity of the • site access had two reported accidents with an average annual accident rate of 0.29. A O preliminary assessment of driver sight distance along SW Hunziker Street found that more than A 400 feet is available in either direction, which exceeds the 350 feet required by City/County Code along streets with a 35-mph posted speed limit. SW Hunziker Street at the site's access is • straight and relatively flat to the west and east. Two other intersections were analyzed and had an • average annual accident rate of less than 0.35 accidents per million entering vehicles. These . numbers and rate of accidents are typical for roadways throughout the City of Tigard. Photos in the Appendix show the section of SW Hunziker Street adjacent to the proposed site access and 0 other nearby intersections. Based on this information and the area reconnaissance, it does not • appear that the applicant needs to address any traffic safety problems in the immediate vicinity of 5 the site. • • TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS O The impact of traffic generated by the Sykart Indoor Racing Center and potential land uses permitted under the proposed Industrial Park zoning on the surrounding street system during the • critical weekday peak hours was analyzed as follows: • • • Based on the projected year of full buildout of the Sykart Indoor Racing Center (the year O 2003), the existing traffic volumes were adjusted to reflect estimated background traffic conditions including other nearby developments that will be completed/approved before the • end of 2003. 0 0 • • • • r S 0 • • 2.035 Tigard Sykart- - 4110 September 9,2002 - Page 5 • • • • Total PM peak hour trips both into and out of the site were estimated for complete buildout of the site (4.20 acres) under existing zoning and proposed zoning. In addition, PM peak hour 1110 trips into and out of the proposed Sykart Indoor Racing Center were estimated for buildout 1110 conditions. • • • Estimated site-generated traffic volumes for the PM peak hours were assigned to the roadway network and added to the estimated background traffic volumes to represent future traffic • conditions with full buildout of the site. • • • Future Levels of Service (LOS) at key intersections in the study area were examined under • background, and full buildout conditions for three trip generation scenarios: existing zoning, proposed zoning, and with the Sykart Indoor Racing Center. • 0 ' O Future Background Traffic Volumes 0 Full buildout of the proposed Sykart Indoor Racing Center is expected to occur by the end of the • year 2003. To assess the likely future traffic conditions regardless of the proposed development, we estimated increases in traffic due to general growth and other proposed developments in the • vicinity of the site. Discussions/meetings were held with City of Tigard and Washington County 410 planning staff to review the area. This research did not find any in-process developments that I must be considered individually for this traffic study. To account for increases in traffic from sources outside the immediate study area during the next year, existing volumes (in Figure 3) were increased by 4 percent per year. Thus, total future 2003 background traffic volumes were estimated by multiplying existing peak hour traffic volumes in Figure 3 by 1.04. The resulting peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 5. • Capacity analyses of background volumes at the study area intersections were performed for the • future background traffic volumes in Figure 5. Results of these analyses are shown in Table 4. lb Comparing these results with the LOS results for existing conditions indicates that with these II conservative assumptions, traffic conditions will degrade slightly, but continue to operate at LOS C or better. 0 Table 4:Future Background 2002 Levels of Service O Intersection PM Peak Hour 0 Signalized Intersection O Avg Vehicle Delay(SecNeh) V/C Ratio LOS 0 SW Hall Blvd/SW Scoffins Road/SW Hunziker St 26.3 0.78 C , 0 , SW Hunziker Street/SW 72nd Avenue 32.4 0.84 C 0 . Minor Dey P Street Stop Control Avg Vehicl e la -, Ill (SecNeh) LOS , O SW Hunziker St/Site's Access Driveway Critical Leg: SB 13.6 B 0 le 0 0 110 S • 2.035 Tigard Sykart • • September 9,2002 Page 6 • • Site-Generated Traffic Volumes Figure lA shows the proposed site plan for the Sykart Indoor Racing Center. The applicant is proposing to redevelop the existing building on the site (approximately 34,777 GSF). The site contains approximately 4.20 acres and is located at 88205 SW Hunziker Street. The site is 5 currently zoned I-L (Light Industrial), which does not permit the proposed development. • Consequently, the applicant is proposing to rezone the site to I-P (Industrial Park). The site is • served by two driveways along the north side of SW Hunziker Street. The applicant is proposing to maintain the site's current access scheme. To assess the impact of the proposed zone change, vehicle trips that would be generated were estimated under three scenarios. First, trips generated O with full development of the site under its existing zoning were estimated using a floor area ratio e (FAR) of 0.38, which is a very conservative assumption when the open space requirements and on-site wetlands are considered. Using this assumption, an additional building of about 35,000 II GSF could be constructed on the site. Trip generated by this scenario were estimated using . standard trip generation rates for Light Industrial uses (ITE code 110) from the ITE Trip 5 Generation Report (6th Edition). Second, trips generated by a worst-case use permitted under O the new proposed I-P zoning were estimated using the same FAR. Discussions with City staff concluded that the most appropriate land uses would be general office uses (ITE Land Use Code S 710). Finally, we estimated PM peak hour trips generated by the proposed indoor racing center. 5 PM peak hour traffic was counted at a similar facility in Vancouver (Hottrack Racing along NE 134/134`h Street) during the PM peak period and compared to counts at another comparable facility in Fife, Washington (Grand Prix Raceway). The Vancouver count was approximately 1/3 lower than the Fife count (14 vs. 22 total trips). To be conservative (slightly high), this 0 analysis will assume that the proposed Racing Center will generate 20 peak hour trips. • Comparing these estimates reveals that the highest trip generation would be with offices uses. li Also, the proposed Sykart will generate fewer trips than if the site was developed under its II existing zoning. 5 Table 5: Trip Generation Scenarios Estimates for the Sykart Indoor Racing Center Site O Land Use Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour _ Trips Total . In Out Total In Out Full Development Current I-L Zoning 488 64 56 8 69 8 61 Light Industrial ITE Code 110(70,000 GSF) IP Full Development Proposed I-P Zoning 771 109 96 13 104 86 18 General Office ITE Code 710(70,000 GSF) II Estimated Trips Proposed Indoor Racetrack IIII From Observed driveway 20 10 10 IPcounts at similar facilities 0 0 Distribution and Assignment of Site-Generated Traffic OTraffic generated by the three scenarios was assigned to the roadway network by considering II existing travel patterns to/from homes and businesses along SW Hunziker Street. The resulting assignments of site-generated traffic during the PM peak are presented in Figures 6a, 6b, and ON 6c. • C 0 • A d 5 2.035 Tigard Sykart IIIII III . September 9,2002 Page 7 0 Total Future Traffic Volumes and Levels of Service Total future 2002 peak hour traffic volumes were estimated by adding the background future traffic volumes displayed.in Figure 5 to the volumes that would be generated by buildout of the • Sykart Indoor Racing Center site, which is shown in Figure 6a-6c. Figure 7a, 7b, and 7c • displays the total future peak hour traffic volumes for 2002 with buildout of the three IP development scenarios. O Table 6 summarizes the results of the intersection LOS analyses for the total future buildout • scenarios. The LOS results in these tables are very similar to the results for the future • background traffic conditions. Again all intersections will operate at acceptable LOS D or better. II Table 6: Total Future 2002 Traffic Conditions with Potential Land Use Scenarios Intersection I PM Peak Hour • Scenario 1: II 2003 Buildout with Light Industrial(0.38 FAR) O Signalized Intersection Avg Vehicle 5 Delay(SecNeh) V/C Ratio LOS • SW Hall Blvd/SW Scoffins Road/SW Hunziker Street 26.8 0.79 C SW Hunziker Street/SW 72nd Avenue 36.9 0.86 D • Minor Street Stop Control • Avg Vehicle Delay (SecNeh) LOS A SW Hunziker St/Site Driveway • Critical Leg: SB 15.2 C Scenario 2: 0 2003 Buildout with General Office(0.38 FAR) S . Signalized Intersection Avg Vehicle • . Delay(Sec/Veh) V/C Ratio LOS . SW Hall Blvd/SW Scoffins Road/SW Hunziker Street 27.5 0.80 C SW Hunziker Street/SW 72nd Avenue 39.5 0.57 D • Minor Street Stop Control 5 Avg Vehicle Delay • (Sec/Veh) LOS SW Hunziker St/Site Driveway 16.2 C • Critical Leg: SB • Scenario 3: 2003 Buildout with Sykart Racing IPSignalized Intersection 110 Avg Vehicle Delay(SecNeh) V/C Ratio LOS IP SW Hall Blvd/SW Scoffins Road/SW Hunziker Street 27.0 0.79 C • ; SW Hunziker Street/SW 72nd Avenue .33.8 0.85 C Minor Street Stop Control O Avg Vehicle Delay O (SecNeh) LOS • SW Hunziker St/Site's Access Driveway 13.9 B Critical Leg: SB _ • • • 0 S . • 2.035 Tigard Sykart September 9,2002 Page 8 Ilk . Finally, future traffic volumes at the site's access driveway were evaluated during the critical O peak hours to determine if a separate westbound left turn lane or eastbound right turn lane are needed. These analyses were based on future worst case 2003 peak hour traffic volumes with office uses under the I-P zoning shown in Figure 7b. The right turn lane analysis is based on the criteria in the ODOT Design Manual, which considers the number of vehicles turning right and IP continuing through eastbound along SW Hunziker Street. As shown in Table 7 below, at full buildout future 2003 peak hour volumes do not meet the right turn lane warrant. Furthermore, Hunziker Street is already 36 feet wide, which allows for vehicles to move to the right when they • slow to enter the site. Finally, as this is a private driveway, traffic volumes will not increase in IP the future significantly beyond our estimates in Table 7. S Table 7: Result of Right Turn Warrant Analysis for Westbound Traffic Along SW Hunziker Street at Site Access Driveway • Projected 2003 PM Peak Hour ODOT Design Manual 0 Scenario: I-P Zoning with Total Approach Right Turns Right Turn S Office Volume Volume Criteria Warrant Met? SW Hunziker St/Site Driveway 508 30 46 NO . To assess the need for a separate eastbound left turn lane along SW Hunziker Street, the warrants • consider the percent of vehicles turning, the opposing volume, and the total advancing volume. Using worst case office uses under the proposed I-P zoning future 2003 peak hour volumes shown in Figure 7b, our analysis shown in Table 8 found that vehicles traveling eastbound O along SW Hunziker Street at the site's driveway turning left do not meet warrants for a separate M left turn lane. III Table 8: Result of Left Turn Warrant Analysis for Eastbound Traffic along SW Hunziker Street at Site Driveway Projected 2003 PM Peak Hour ODOT Design Manual . Opposing plus II Scenario: I-P Zoning with Advancing Approach Office Volume Left Turns Volume Criteria Warrant Met? • SW Hunziker St/Site Driveway 375 7 _ 38 NO Ili II SITE ACCESS 0 5 As shown in Figure 1A, the applicant is proposing to develop the Sykart Indoor Racing Center, O which will reuse an existing building approximately 34,777 GSF. The site contains 4.20 acres and is located at 8205 SW Hunziker Street. The site currently has two driveways along SW 5 Hunziker Street that provide one inbound lane and separate left and right turn outbound lanes. O The applicant proposes to use these driveways as they currently exist. The applicant will not O have to construct any frontage improvements because both sides of Hunziker Street already have with curbs, sidewalks, and gutters. S a S S 0 S • 2.035 Tigard Sykart • September 9,2002 Page 9 PARKING O Parking was also observed at the Vancouver and Fife Washington facilities. During the PM peak 0 hour, the peak number of cars observed in their parking lots were 7 and 14 respectively. At the . Grand Prix Raceway in Fife, a maximum of 20 cars were parked during the facility's peak operations Saturday evening. Currently, the Tigard site contains approximately 44 striped parking stalls adjacent to the building and 46 stalls separating the access driveways. Unmarked areas adjacent to the existing building could also contribute an additional 29 parking stalls for a 0 total of 119 parking stalls on site. In addition, the peak use period for the proposed Sykart Indoor Racing Center is expected to occur between 8:00 and 10:00 PM on the weekends. As the adjacent business are not opened at this time, a minimum 29 additional spaces will be available Considering that only 10 people can race at one time and that most people spend about an hour at 5 the facility, the parking demand is expected to average less than 30 vehicles. Based on these 0 numbers, the Tigard site for the Sykart Indoor Racing Center will have more than adequate parking available to accommodate its peak parking demands. CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of the analyses described in this report, it is concluded that traffic generated by the proposed Sykart Indoor Racing Center and rezoning of the site to I-P will not adversely r affecting traffic operations or safety in the vicinity of the site. Furthermore, key intersections and roadways in the study area can operate at acceptable Levels of Service when this development is built out. No specific off-site roadway improvements are recommended to accommodate this development or mitigate its impact. Also,the existing parking spaces in the immediate vicinity of this building are more than adequate to meet the peak parking demands of the proposed racing Center. • Sincerely, EtEO PROF , 0.1G I NE. Howard S. Stein,P.E. 7;.Transportation Engineer �, OREGON � � 5 %' v 19," 44 S �o SCOTZ S 5 RENEW DATE 1404 7 S S S S S S • ✓ 110006111011■110•00000• • • ••• • • • ••110.011000.0111101100000 Figure 1: Site Area and Vicinity Map 1 - -3: ir— \ 11 41, :.[QJ . 'CI 1, >41". ( Mt < r" CO .= il § ki:Li, 1 IL 1111 C::/is, \):„1::::::::::::111 ;.151 kil ri \ _--,,, 217 C — —10 tit •- rn r-_.: v . ge i al w N._..._...,,,:; _'<:1\ -r.....4,4, n \\4` Semi ry ' I 1 ct_ ‘\ 61S) 0 i'' 'i L- oThk..„ , ,s 44 \Is*"•; . of P ihi'oeersni i Tigard , ......: \\ \, \(\ ,..._,....„. ill Fanno Park . °Tigard , I rr:I., , ,( --- ,„ Lake Osweg\ -- , \ i t--' , \\ jI \ I\ I 1 Itn) ICh I- - 1 erry_Dr_i L_____, N 0)2000 Morosoft Corp.and/or its suppliers.Pit dints:reserved. - Drawing not to scale. Proposed Site Ct S 2.035 Tigard Sykart Engineers,Inc. ... . . .. ..... e.. .. . . . .. . . . ...... . . .. .. . . .. . • . Figure 2: Study Area and Intersection Lane Configurations in the Vicinity of The Tigard Sykart\ it i jr Li - . • *-----1 Nii) ,? ). g (1 n ,_,, 1 L ,1 . -44 .� s ,_,. , ,. .4, , , ...,,,,,,,,, / 0 , ,,\,,, ,,, ,.. (I, c° ,i;;: li, \< // --„,s,iv,....,,,,1,1,,:,::1:;,i, ;::: ‘4.. al 4 \ �`� Z 6 � \� 1!cI1 4 � 6 M19 of 6 Tigard lti� , � City Hall 4.`+ f/ i' ! 1-, it *4 ` tSw Varns_St� `` Fenno Park :'k rg 11} 0Tigard \l,, 1 �- I .,‘,...i. ,,, ��-1l Llfi f I I r ti N --t I 1 1 ithe r ID 2000 Morosoft Corp.and/or its suppliers.All ri ts:resented. —1 -- Traffic Signal Stop Sign a Proposed Roadway - - - - * Not Striped But Wide Enough for Right Turn AM(PM) Peak Hour Volumes ** Left Turn Lane for a Single Residential Driveway Drawing not to scale. El Proposed Site Ct 2.038 Tigard Sykart Engineers,Inc. ••• • • •• 111110• ••• •000 • •• s • • ••• • ! • • • •• • • • • • • • • Figure 3: Recent Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes in the Vicinity of The Tigard Sykart o -- ono.it 4)1 4L 165 ;h H !' — 4)4 (170)(230) 11 r� C q i1 ... 0.'i a 1.-C-c . Ki '''\ :izooN, -----1 1 .4\.,. ,- N • ,11/7.0:1\\\ 14 Ig.. -5, s \ ', Li s'‘.3 ,r—r, `P'dN,„'.\ 1) ,.I:i 111111M!;1:: - r-)1 ---it -I g t I d s, rl� ® N ge ,al tD 5„ ` (Ti p,1 '�� Is- 44---- S e ry 1 t 1 'O lZ` r, �} �_,Q Q 6_ i I , � �(t Sri'6> 11 JO . . '''-'- -k- Tigard `w, r� 1 '.s; City Hall -� �� r i' `:\ (SW Varas_St:f \' Fenno '� N ':'• �_ . o Lard ij , rr ,--,, , Lake Oswego • I it, f --��,— I N �Cherry_t?rJ ' /I 002000 cfl �. —i ---- - C i"-\ Traffic Signal Stop Sign a (3) L(16) Proposed Roadway - - - - (225)Now■ • (460) AM(PM) Peak Hour Volumes J Drawing not to scale. Interpolated from Intersection and Past Counts Proposed Site Cta 2.035 Tigard Sykart Engineers,Inc. • •• • • •• •• •±i411 ••• • • • 0 • • 410 • • •!• • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • Figure 4: Traffic Accident Patterns Throughout Study Area (1999-2001) 1 ;i 1 '''''C'k. \ ict_____:,-uN ..--- l -, — n y ( llLOd- 11 si LJLJ)6 ar—cp • .‹)g \ ''''''' , R:i:�~ i _\ \ C _i�L ill l7/� 19 ,—f I F RE-2 si - �, lii . m < -t ,---co-2-g- S'. I"; < Turn- 3 / f:7-6-7,7 Other-0 A� _ _ rn �+ � N ageial 5' 51- tii� Semi � r I Acc. Rate= 0.32 I ; `Rq \� }}�� fg PDO=4 INJ =1 J \.`. ; `tit lVersi --k � of Rhoeni Tigard `: ,,s, City Hall. 'ti;. r� i (SW Varns_St� � � Fenno Park . e • Tigard ! _ + r Lake Oswego f �Gh - - , I erry_Qr ,r---"C Rearend ®2000 Morosoft Corp.and/or its supplie WI riglns:reserved. --1 S/S= Sideswipe Traffic Signal H/R= Hit& Run PDO= Property Damage RE- 2 RE- 5 Stop Sign a INJ=Injury Turn- 0 Turn- 0 Proposed Roadway - - - - Other-0 Other-0 AM(PM)Peak Hour Volumes Acc Rate=Average Accident Rate Per Acc. Rate= 0.29 Acc. Rate= 0.24 Million Entering Vehicles PDO= 1 PDO=4 Drawing not to scale. Proposed Site INJ = 1 INJ = 1 Ct3 2.036 Tigard Sykart Engineers,Inc. • • • • • • ••• • •• ••06 • • • • • • • • • •• • •• • • 41 •! • • • • • • • • • • Figure 5: Future 2003 Background Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes in the Vicinity of The Tigard Sykart r «,-- &--Lo r\-1- 4IIN\ ( r---CD (16) 1 L(172) I IC-Flip" �� (192) .1 (42) ■e+ . . x(109) ' : -I '4" (57) " * 4'1(218) :.., y �- -i — 1. (270)vo, _______11.1 — Ili vl t —Tr — vz li.1° -' -t,_ \.111 C�J q 035 N • ,e Zil ,...- r. i z., r LI Cb4,, ::,'11111111iii' V 0-ts>"\\:: -)? .„:118i.:4101111 \\\.,e7 c--1 :-: LI L___ N t'� ,f lqi.„ Q �_' k rj afi9e all 5g i '? NIk m R )/,_, _„_____,, \.4,6,,z&':4 Se rJQ 12 I �, \\. . I4. iversit3 , __i3 —t7 `t-ot Phoenix• Tigard /t ) 1• ,� City Hall `�� /7" � � ��. `: 6 c_ Varns=St't •` Fanno Park �' • angard I irn—, \\ Lake Oswego _ ] ' co-V---I, ‘Sl N —0t Gh - J ° Traffic Signal Stop Sign a (3)i_i t•(16) Proposed Roadway - - - - (225)Ns. 4.010(460) AM(PM)Peak Hour Volumes Drawing not to scale. li( N Proposed Site C1 2.035 Tigard Sykart Engineers,Inc. •• • • • • • •• • •• •• • • • • • •• • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Figure 6a: Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Generated by Development Under Light Industrial Zoning (I-L) ITE Land Use 110 Light Industrial l ,.., N LL(6) - j wow O ``''`' ani (15) 1 t 41!r' \ , �'ir _F (30) Z ),„)--- I 4 i cp,q/S \ �b� ( I T ,› i --)) ,,„,, r-VJ -�,-�,,e 5 —at Er ,s, A ,\ ,,,, ,_ ., ,,, ,,, ...-e------a) er1 [7.-4e E_____g_ _ ..s.,. Ki7,7,, / -v-:- '',0 ,4_, .1 i_ cti 1.--- r-- �`� ' '�Atp� � $e ail I i ! '\ V )/--------.- ... � K !Illy' r 9 iuersi At ` ;. of Phoeni Tigard r City Hall `4 .� ,�, � cs Varns_St� _ c • Fenno Park I _ _ °Tigard J �—� '1'' Lake Oswego f o N-N,'\‘ A i n i o ,Cherry-or� L 1:0 2000 Traffic Signal Stop Sign a (2)1 t(6) Proposed Roadway - - - - IN OUT AM(PM)Peak Hour Volumes PM 8 61 Drawing not to scale. Proposed Site Ct B 2.036 Tigard Sykart Engineers,Inc. • • • • • • • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • •• • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Figure 6b: Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Generated by Development Under Industrial Park Zoning (I-P) ITE Land Use 710 General Office ( ( 44 ) LA' (22) RF 4P lis, .„ ,,, ,, .‘ ) r ,0 --„, r 7-gl hi- M �m °� d 4 • jy, ,R L . / I cp• -sus t?.:: \-5, ,i:%. 11, A;:-/- r------ UL_ _, LA — ii /4, A 1 '-)) :1'111:' ' li:dez.VD,i,j=-7 n 1--v:-..,* .e —0, g , , .,-- , 1(1,1 -•40,- ..-4,----3 ei 1 1 -„,,, <6.> ----,....e,, 1111,,, , N4.. et \,... ri,,,, ,,,.„6,..9.. ' 1 N +'� ,:. I ip 5e •al Ng 1 1 ; R ' • .,, 11. ,— — k'l' I i�, - iversi Tigard / f�- j I• A ` oPhoeni City Hall, `'� J ` rJ `; CSW Varns_St= o l` _ Fanno Park CN-•8 • o igard ( 1 I �-, Lake Oswego Jc } i } 6 N v- tCherry_Or� L 11 M2000 2000 e N co ! - �I f�� Traffic Signal Stop Sign a (4)1 t-(14) Proposed Roadway - - - - IN OUT AM(PM)Peak Hour Volumes PM 18 86 Drawing not to scale. El Proposed Site Cta 2.035 Tigard Sykart Engineers,Inc. • • • • • • • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Figure 6c: Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Generated by Development Of the Proposed Sykart Indoor Racing Center 1 v N 44, 1�(1) -- —CI —I E–(___ ;;ii 6 r ,c) F-----"g" sk\ • )s. !____11-1 _ 111 \-1 1 • it- G lt \------------____:=1 ' il.---/I V to th R.LA _. r FIN„ ici . •) '52/(P% tr: 15 X, - :--; A r? cb 4,4, 10 zoe\,,- -.) 4.'ir'll.' 't-v:i 1-----vi /7\ti �� �/ dill: , 4 . +-� \\.„..... `�, �; �/ 2SS � � �So .dg-e. .al I C17-i pl fg I:11 rn ,.,.,,,, PI 41DI \NI� _1 1� '�,!�`�'' U iu9r5i 1 ? =.,, of Phoeni Tigard City Hall {j ylS cSVV— §: Fanno Park ° _ • aTigard y ii___i 1 iY,,- -, Lake Oswego ] ,.... t ❑ ti I'ch Y 1 M2000 M R �• —1 1 L--2'N'M Traffic Signal t Stop Sign a (3)1 t..(7) Proposed Roadway - - - - IN OUT AM(PM) Peak Hour Volumes PM 10 10 Drawing not to scale. Ej Proposed Site C ;, 2.035 Tigard Sykart Engineers,Inc. • • • • • • • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • •• • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Figure 7a: Total Future 2003 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes with Full Buildout Under Industrial Park Zoning (I-P) ITE Land Use 710 General Office cqc Rul N .—.-. "4\ ,....v C7 el � v 4J4 . `, . �l (16) �(42 �.� x(109) ; I� —(57) (229) :��h t r y (208) (302) � — h t .c,i \'., c f i I :Fr-) 'cI\ i 1, 4 r-J -",/-/\\, lo .---_,________O 6' i,r-k--c44. ' 1-4-;:j... I1-1 \cb, „\\., ----1 ; 111L_ 1 b to , _ ,i , .6> _ ,./ „11:::11111i:1111:111,111,111111111111,1.1,111, \\\\_,\‘..),,,_____n_ja, - 5,:c.-)1 ..._a_.---Lo_ \ ----__040. 4,:mild ‘, . .1 Ii c� ,,,, // ----- .i,i:!1.' ® N .pDe ,al 54+ —Eu z r4,4e ' l R ,y,41, Se ary L 'ti � \r�; ive rsit3 ' -4-k' Tiggard 2‘?*'� `�_ y is ; •• • • • • • •. • •• • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Figure 7b: Total Future 2003 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes with Full Buildout Under Industrial Park Zoning (I-P) ITE Land Use 110 1 Nin R .•,.V 444\ c■1 CV � .'a ch in 4)l ► 4l (16) 1 L(182) .:� I (42) ..O 0 ♦—(109) `„. (213) ■1 6 (57) t ,`'(234) .� — ��1tf ,, y (317) ,, i '11 E -1 6 71-i cli '-''zr,— ..-51:„_\--5--'70 \N " LO ic9,.,,---c4 ..), , ,.. i ' ...,„. ..,,,, i z ....., .d (.1 15 .s, 0 el ,- , -- kl , , / ,9), \ r__. '1 ,4. \,.: 1,z.,.._) 111;11 4.4e.\\,e,....1„.. ) *1 ___— - - �■` - iii ! r ���.., - , `�q�y fli+` Fla en aI t , z5, ' 6 R4 !�''+� i I Se .P/� CO.. /r--..-------. ._„!,:4)-it .L.\ I— — - jDC' y,'i\ /, A IVer51 47" y �` of Phoenl• Tigard I City Nall 1 i: ;�, cS1N Varns_5t� '; ,� Fenno Park N ` ^-•^_ • o igard 1 Lake Oswego 1r � --, ,. � r4e _QLi N �r, \ rry L ®2000 f� N 'i. �I _ k''... v v Traffic Signal Stop Sign is (7).00- L(30) Proposed Roadway - - - - (234) 4000(478) AM(PM) Peak Hour Volumes ` Drawing not to scale. rj Proposed Site Ct B 2.036 Tigard Sykart Engineers,Inc. •• • • • • • •• ••• • • • • • • • • • •• • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Figure 7c: Total Future 2003 Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes with Buildout Under proposed Sykart Development i a c■-i L r) i•--- 'Ill i -iNi RI' M 41L 4l (16) ../ L(172) `� :� (42) �► —(109) .� I °�' nil 198) 57 (224) � _� qlF ( ) k, -, 1 ",S (276) t ��r11 �' .�t, E(- x'11 vc4 c 'l is `,. ate' 4 r�i • ?\-----74:-ell •- N- i '10:.. > .-1 ii-. 1 .?/:k CD a ,c3/04 45,„ .<, 13)1 - ;I I - , -0, \ F.-) .„11111,,,„„... %.„,... Ll L_ fi 1-1:1 - 9 '4-64 ,,,di1111111111;;;;;;;:1:,"' \,,g.,,rD ..__FL-M--- — 1—:_-> .e ,6_0 "'She I' — ''. `�� 1"l4--4-;,---...,.at_ ®, CV edge all 5; — G.� \lk.\` S a $e 1 a — to . 4� l T� � IVAr51 i Tigard ',.':� �1 IILLLLSSYYYY//:•, of P=i City Hall ` T"' ti.. (swivarns_St� ,,,, ^ Fenno Park Ii N ; - • Tigard I ti �� Lake Oswe -7---t -I go Ca Sl N -..-., ,Cherry=©r� \ ®2000 ti 1- 1. —, t . � � J l Traffic Signal `�► Stop Sign (234)y t"(23)) Proposed Roadway - - - - \ 478 AM(PM)Peak Hour Volumes J Drawing not to scale. El Proposed Site c t S 2.036 Tigard Sykart Engineers,Inc. Engineers, Inc. S S S TECHNICAL APPENDIX S S 5 Attached is the Technical Appendix for CTS Engineers traffic impact study for Project OR02.035.T01, . Tigard Sykart Indoor Racing Center. It includes the following information: • • 1) Photos of Proposed Site Access and Other Nearby Intersections • • 2) Roadway Inventory Sheets • 3) Manual Turn Movement Counts • • 4) ODOT Crash Data S . 5) Accident Analysis Worksheet 6) Trip Generation Worksheets • 7) Capacity Worksheets for Existing Traffic Volumes • • 8) Capacity Worksheets for Future 2003 Background Traffic Volumes S 9) Capacity Worksheets for Future 2003 Light Industrial Buildout 10)Capacity Worksheets for Future 2003 Industrial Park Buildout 11)Capacity Worksheets for Future 2005 Traffic Volumes with Proposed Tigard Sykart S • 12)Right/Left Turn Lane Warrant Analysis 13)Traffic Impact Analysis for Sykart Tukwilla Facility S S S • S S S S --- ........ .... .:.. ... .... . -• :. . I , .:• .. .. ".. ..: I .... :: . ,. 0• - , - • .• .. ... . . .. . I •,:i• .• E'. I ...................................:...:........„..:., ... .. . ... ., .::.:::::. :0:::::•.. . I : •....:•• :1 1:11115 ;:::::::::"."...: : ::1::::::•::::::::... . : :.,••• ..4, .• _., „::..... ...::::::::4,.....iiiik. :,::''''''::::::::-..• ....:::44440.,...,...:::.:::444:::::::::.:.....:!. .. ...„..:............ 10 . .......•• •:•:.•• ...... :.••.,::::...::.:........: . ... 1.11k . •-••••:::::"....ir:1!:•:::::•••01,iii!•"1.",•, :•::ii0 .::.:::::'::111111'::.:.::. I -- .- . i....:::::.::::'''..:. iii,i'il:::::*::::: :... ...................i.....S1011L,,,,, ......:....:...1:111.......i.'::::':': ... ::::..:::::.:•iy::::•::::::::::.:::•: I ::::::::::::::: :•:: .:::•:.:•••::::: ....:".,-it,r::::::::::::::0:•:::•••:•:: ....:::4,.7:::!..:::".•-:::. - :.:?:!::::: .:::„..........:::: .::::::::::::.:::.::::::::::::::....:.••:::•.•::. .-....-.. . . .•:...: :::::::::::::::::::::::!:::•::::::::::::...• : , • • ..• ,4# ::::::::::::::::::::::::......::•:• .. . . . ::::::::::::::::::::::::::!::::;:•:::::::::::. .. .. . IP ... .... . i „:•1:.,:„....:. i i:::. ...i...::-.„....„ ::::!:•1•11 ..::::1,2 i....-:::::.......:.......:.1:011.::: r•-0A. ,••:til.....7„....., ....„... D I I IP • ••.••.•••. f.,!,. • I • ... .; ., • • • .... ....... ... ..... •••• ••• II .. ......-4, ..,J.,..,.......:41..;::. ..4 "...v.:::. . 1 1 ---.....,,1 ."". w...J.,.!:74:::....- ...... • •• •-***4..',WISM ' 11/ i 1.'!-1,1!!!!!!;:i..!rg,...,,,,,,..■. ., ... .'". ., ........... IIML • ::. ...• • . - • i:104... 9 i:.t.:............. . . D „:„...... .- . . ;:.:.,. .1 ......„. ::.,:::..,..::......,,ii:hil.:Iii..... .. . ....••.. • •••••.... . ••••• •••• • ..:...::aviiii,:::::::::......:::::114:•:::::: ..: .:.4, :•:::.::::::.:::::::::::::4::...,..i.45:„..::•:••.. ... .... ... .. . •::.•••••••::::::::::::•:::::::::::::::::::.: ___ :: .. ....•::•":,:ww95:dmitir:.:::::•::::::::::::4:::.:::.......-••••:•::"":ig::::::::. •• •::...:.:.:.....:.•:::::.:.:::::::.:: a . .:E..Ak•. :........;.:............:::.....•... ... • ........ -4:::::::::.:.,.. • .:••::::::::::::::::::55:1::::::::::::::: 1 .....,..kinif v..: [.... ....ik..i......„....... 1:•••::::-.:: .....:......• .1........:„.„:•:. ::::.„1 1....... -..:\:,..: I .1...,i•:,..„:::„...... .....„.,:.,,e.: ... up I D 110 ..••• ....11!...-' ••:::.::1-:::... ; . ,......... .... :: , Iiii,.... . 1 . • iiiiiA_ •:. • ..:. .......ii • .: •••••• - ..-• •• • .-.......:.,.... ,;••• ... • •••••#'''' ''';'-•:.:::::::..:.::ii:;!;::::::1 r ................: . 4.... •••:•••lt•:•••:.1::::•:::::Pil J:'::!::::::•::••::: ••""11454;`..'!•:::::..:.::::;:;..:•:•:•: D :::::::::!:-..,••••••• ' .. ........"•.:..:... . D • . :::::::::::..: .:.••••••••.•::::::::::::::::::::. ...::100:.::::: •::::,:.::::::!:::::::1"-dimignii::::::.::: .• •.::.:::::•:::::::::::: •••-•""•:::11::::::::. D ..:••: •...• .. • :..........::::::::::::::.:. ::::::::ii:" D ::::...:••••••.... .:. .••.••:...............•.:::::::::::::' • .:..:...........::::::::::::::::::::::::,„--Aq D1 :::•••:kif.„. i•.:1-1 ..-.,::•.:II... ss.,:,...k.: Fit.iii/..:::-......:•r• \-•••:•:-....,........! ......i ••••:1„.... ii::-...........**-`1 I 10 . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. ... . . . • .. . ID 14, 2r_, -... -- ••••• 0 . . • , .: I ... •• • • . . ... . ..„...:•:::::.:••••••• • :::-mr.-.:: ., ..,. • s..,;•...*::: •• ..ti.-1.• I :::::::::::::....:: ••••••••,..: ::: • ...,..:....,-:. • •piti:,•::::::.:••: ................ 1.!!!„Ri:11if.:4............:.• .. - ..., : . -.,,,, e!!!.....::••• . .,,i.!::::;:::::,•:..•1. ..- 4,1g4ggiw ...".,.... ....4.''KaTit.:::: ID ...-••.::::...7,---..... •••:::::.:.•.:::::•:::::::•• I • •••• ..•••.••••.•••••••. .. ............... I •• • • .:::::....P....,...: ....::::::,...............0 .• . • * • .• • .. ::::::iii: . . .• • . * •••••••,::::::.•,........:•••••: •-.....•:....::::::::::::111511M ••••:. 1..c....,:pk i€.1... 11 a 1:11;•.! '1/4,,N. I itahratttr Strettt -ai ttotkkr. 72:''' Avenue. I.'. lir 1 1 D a .. - ••••••.....;:;..,,...:-:•:.::::.i.:..,...:••.....:..•,-•:.•:.•-..-.....•..••'•.•.."•:.,•..f.:.....:...:;t.•:•,..•7'4..:. .... .1:1:...,• :' .•i i .'S;i.....i.!,*••.••.1:. .:•5..1.-11'.a 4..•,.:...:... A..•....-•....o.e.;p•._.. .t}:.=t.!1/2.::_t..::.•u .:•.i .t..t.'• . .. D .4:: .::::::. •.:::.......:•,4:::,••• ... ..: • •••,.. • . .. ..... •• • . •••••••• :::;::::::::: ::::::: ... .. . .::.:::,::::::::•" ,• ::::: „.••••• •:::::....• :,:::::...:..:..: II ••.....••• ••• MI. • •• • ...,•:,::::::::11:rii :1:111:9::.: • ......i • I ...: ..:• .!.....,..;::::.•.... •.•. .••-•-••••.':.,..........i......1.. ..... :::.::::::::::: •••... • ••.........-.•••••:•!.........ii :::::::::::;I: 0 ...:::::..:::.::.•::.••:•• . . ••:::::: ...-'.........1:1::„:.• ••••, •••••••••••••••••,,:1::::::::::::::•:••••:•::.::::..:.:.:.::••••••. •••••;:itgo :,::: :::::•:::•:•:.:.::::::::::::::..•.::.••••••::: ..'.4,......t.. a 1 catit intt ts.,13. ;Ili:11;2, CAI.: .../.2'' At fa:liar at SVt. I itarriltar Strata i/ • • t'.. .:.• ' `'.., at ... . 7:..........4;:i.' ...-t,....:‘,..• 40:. :t ;.::: ... D .. .. D : 1 -:.- tl....- :,,,;—• . •. . • • .• • :::.: li . -.. 11101-• .:. -k'4:. 1, 4 ', r......'. ,• •.:. — • 1"4 .. — is : ... • : * P .;:ii,.... • — — .. .•' AMP, ' ' ' :. '..1 ., ':—. '. i •• ••:PPPPN:::•:•:•:::•::::::::: I :„ „::::„„,:„::, ••••.......... ..-........... - - -1•••.:.,..,„ ..:.:•:.:..:::..... .. : .... . .. . . :::::.: ••••,..::::•:::: ::.::. . ID :::.:: :.:.::::::::::::::::::+:::". ......::::::•:..::•::..•....•.........• ...............••••••••...• • . • ::::::„... •:•:::::::::::::::::: ::::::•:::::••••••:.:::. •........:•• ::•.•.• •:::•::. ::::::::• ••::::::••• :•::::::::::.:..••• . ..••• .. ::::::::. ::::: .::.::.::.:::::.::. •.:: •••••••••••••.....................• • . .... . ... ........... • .. .. .... .. ........ .. .. .... ............. .. 0 ••.....•• ..........:............. . • : ••• .•::::::: ro,:::„:•::•••••::•::::::::::::: ::: •• •":„. D :::. ::::::::::::::.::::::::•::::::: ::::::::.. •.: ::.: .." . .„:„....:::.!.'1...1.....i...1.................:..1.:!!.:1::111.::::'..,Ii.,:...ii!••••••••...••••:,...•••••:. • ..... :::'... ...::.......:::::.:::.:::::: '...........:::••••••••:::::::::::::::...........L ::::::.::::::.... . ..:. :::::::.......„ :::.:.::::•:.• ••• . 1 1.);'1.„i'll!..1 4"..,Ti. li k F112. tiVt. 7."'"' Avtatac tit tt,Vt ;gaa,eakisf Sire:a D II D • I 0. I .•....., •-•••• . ...j I .. .- . „...„... ..7, .,.- • _ .....,00;:-...likt. .-......,!:...,..,.. --.: D .„4:..-........ ...,t..1,,.!°''':.*:.... ......„-:.7:..i. I .. • .-.........•'•.....II:.•.•••.1•'.4' • ••• •• :••- '•..--...............6,1„.,: ...: I ,,,E7, , . ,:•• ••-. :•::•••,•••••••,. i .. .....S.... I ''.....: ....r.........:-.....'44.. I —.4- .:'• - :: :::- : ... ,.. . I 1:01::::::::::::„...„,•••••:•••••-•••,:,..,-••••••-•-• . *::.4.1A11"...,•-....:',..,.....******** ......L..:*......,i,..,..,......."!!...11.•.1,4t.,..„ .. „ .. I I ;,,,;,..4.44,2„ .4,4,..,...„.„.................:... . _. „....,;,„,....„, „,..,....,...\-•••'•••••••••::::::::::••••••,::::•••:•..i.:::•••••:•.,•••••:::,::•••:•.::::•••::,••••••:••••::::.•••••••:::•••••±.......... -....... . I ''''"'"''''• • ., :,„\;,, ,t10,-,„ .1/4;4,,‘• I 1,,,,,,k,...., .... : a I I I I I a 1144iiiiiillifaiii•-,;1-•iiiihilliliiii#:!'„...*:•••••••••••••••••••••• - ilitalloptigiclui„,.....,..„..,............. a ..:12•Nut-romechnougii±:„:„.... imitr:4:-.........'":pT-.................•.:. -.................44anif::::: I ,..p.,... .. .. . . I I ..1,•,,,,i,„:.!,0•,!...T:!...::::::::::::::„...„:„....„:„:„.....:.:•:::..: :... .. ........................„............ I :::,,,,,,„,„,..„::::::::::::::.:„.„:•••••••••••• I a .....,- „4. I 44; .T. a I •• :::,!„.„:•:,....,••: . .....: ....„,:„.„ a :•••:. - „„:„. .„„„:„•••• • .....,:j."':...„.... .„••••••;.... ..,,,,,,,,,,......,-...„........• a •••• a .,•••*94...,..„:::::::::„ • „.......4, .... _ _.:•••,..3.,...4 .......- , ...... ,..„..„-„.. •••••„.............. ........,.. .. 0. •• •• -••-•••••• • ' .•••••••-...+4.': 7:•::z•-.w... ......"irt......•...„......o.....40ik , --- • • :••••,g4.:::,••• ••....F?..: •• •,„,..,„,..„,...,$•,‘,. ---- -•• .. •.....„.: ......._ ..... •••-•,.........„.„, a •:•:••••.:••••••,„„. .4.,.. :.,::: I ............ a ril....011.111411;;;7:•••••:;4..•..."........,...:....,....................-................................. . . ••••••••••••••••• [i.;7..,..:tilr.......:::::i•:::::!..!!!!'...,.'::::::::::••••••••••••,..::::::::::::::::„:::::••••„•,:..........„.... . .. . ...... ... ...,-I.-..,..". ..:,:o..g.m.:„..,:::„„„„„:::::::::::::::::„„:„:„.. ......•••••••••••„.,.. a ::::,...,•:,Al.n:I5I....„3.11,,„,,,,,„,,,,,::::„„„:„„•••••:::•:.•....... ,.'--,IIII.mill:::::::::::Eq,•,,,,,,,,,,,:::,.....::.: •••.„.$,„,,,,,,,,,,,,, ._..._., . I I a . • . ........ ......: a I I I • • • • • H. S. Stein, P.E. Roadway Inventory Sheet 13340 S.W. Hanson Road Transportation Engineer Beaverton, Oregon 97008 • Phone/Fax (503) 641-1437 elect # & Name Sao irowicity ytd. fwt. Date: //7/11e) •tion: 5a Ma7-7- er yt" /iz&4 44e . . Analyst: 11/z- • •Data: Land Uses, Street Width & Lanes, Bus Stops, Traffic ControVSignal Phases, Roadside/Sidewalks, Length of Right/Left Turn Lanes, Signs, Line of Sight etch I ;LSr' Notes: 17 • 0ce 317, 47I i Fi # 3S = 93 • `�il y ' U h r' ^ r 6 0 • • F i3 — �`I • ,i,I rcibAir 'ILL VA • v \;1,Y 12 1'II• • q • • art Name Road Width ' Posted Side Bike On-Street Comments • Class . . Speed walks ,Lane Parking •3w .7 2 .4 4Jt CO- 3 0 y* NI N �u-r s;d a s-:d � P°� � , S.:d{e r W,,4H, ;-c�Les y' pw✓ed 61-1.1- Ovate_• If WO t-fl AiSGel 0 49 I 35 kee N nt souffi sa -1?'r.u.ld .wry SI* - • • Oat Timing (Signal Phases) Time Observed: j: 5-o Pm . . •• S . li • . . • -)• g GR: S-° GR: tic GR: GR: GR: GR: GR: .. = Gaga Z 6 Gy rt e. go •ed Li, Yel+Red 4 Yel+Red tr Yel+Red Yel+Red Yel+Red Yel+Red . Yel+Red •ted/Pretimed Cycle Length: Pedestrain Sig: Flow: • • . • . 1111 • 0 • • H. S. Stein, P.E. Roadway Inventory Sheet 13340 S.W. Hanson Road •Transportation Engineer Beaverton, Oregon 97008 Phone/Fax (503) 641-1437 • Date: i 7 /®v Wt # & Name Sfo/ �urtiey ,.-4 1it l :On: w 4--415 - 14-wsetiGe, . / fEU 411/01 Analyst: TVr • •ata: Land Uses, Street Width & Lanes, Bus Stops, Traffic ControVSignal Phases, Roadside/Sidewalks, • Length of Right/Left Turn Lanes, Signs, Line of Sight Ilkh l di& Notes: • n °1 No-f- 5-nuiED 81"'T 4.0;be ca. ..6µ u01 Fort- T �- • O r 4. 4 ,,,car -}o 5;.rs -t cc_ at Of"✓YS • � uass..� �} 3S' Z goy ,,-\ �'4' co 74 � o f • (� s — - o D • 0 1I ' ( g4 U 62: 6_,,,) ,o5 • 1;i1. 110r.Q.SR________? 6° Cox 11o�/ _ •. NO ( d IC4^y A 1,.^1_, 9 '7 1 3 5- i • ® 1 U ma Pan L'ir3 -044.1 sick f S eel ; Hz e I 1 c dc. t r1o*a• h t 19, • . • . !t Name Road Width Posted Side Bike On-Street Comments • Class Speed walks .Lane Parking e--' lz ")t-T 4: O • Hhwll h1,,d 391 3o y e-s' ^) ,:d i., s g.!_. 411/ o jt sT 1,d2 e .. N ys � 3o Y i I L . •4I '� j41 ciit e4 S� ,iiNn3 GeA Si- 3 G. 3 S y N N ti, walla •s"' 5co .. , Rd at N)e ry N _ _ III Timing (Signal Phases). Time Observed: • • L.D r "fD . • O4° GR: q GR: 4 GR: If GR: GR: GR: GR: • • 9s". Sled .1t4 Yel+Red 13 Yel+Red ci, Yel+Red g Yel+Red Yel+Red Yel+Red Yel+Red •ted/Pretimed Cycle Length: Pedestrain Sig: Flow: • • . • • • • • •' • • H. S. Stein, P.E. Roadway Inventory Sheet 13340 S.W. Hanson Road • Transportation Engineer Beaverton, Oregon 97008 Phone/Fax (503) 641-1437 • lipct# & Name 5-Co/ o cy ynd . pa'vZ. Date: I/7/®d Lion: ivntiGei 5/ / '61t' 1-ccc - Analyst: rl/r I)ata: Land Uses, Street Width & Lanes, Bus Stops, Traffic ControVSignal Phases, Roadside/Sidewalks, . Length of Right/Left Turn Lanes, Signs,Line of Sight •ch Notes: • •• -4.F free,... . .,'k. & e-es * rd. `f P r-/Y f • • c) ) c U .D cp kc ' v 4.i ' 0 dr- 71 ---1 1 1 t---' (--- 00 ' ry) Pt '� 32. • tiro s 2a 6/ R l.J /3 / • 0 ce-if'�'+` s;ir= '`cs� t 4 ' _s '2.04 • • • •t Name Road Width Posted Side Bike On-Street Comments • Class . . Speed walks .Lane Parking •4�. tkwnq5 44 St'. 36 ' 3S "1 rJ N • 36 ' 3S y ft) rJ ,,,,. . 5-1'ce.e. 0,...4. _ • . • •l Timing (Signal Phases) Time Observed: . • • • • _ • • GR: GR: GR: GR: GR: GR: GR: • sled Yel+Red Yel+Red Yel+Red Yel+Red Yel+Red Yet+Red Yel+Red •ed/Pretimed Cycle Length: Pedestrain Sig: Flow: • ] • . • . • II II INTERSECT TURN MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMAR PORT SW HALL B•- EVARD AT SW HUNZIKER/SCOFFI',- STREET • T= 2.3% P=.892 • DI 496 ♦ DATE OF COUNT: 08/20/02 p 1580 DAY OF WEEK: Tue II R 12 . 437 47 TIME STARTED: 16 :00 T TIME ENDED: 18 :00 • H *-133 • • j L.■ 4-471 15 J L162 T= 1.8% T= 2 .4% IP 39 —► 4-101 P=.879 P=.795 55 20.8 TEV=TOTAL ENTRY VOLUME ♦ r T=%TRUCKS BY APPROACH . II .41 � r► 157 —► P=PHF BY APPROACH 109 —► JWHI 20 . 403 . 71 Peak Hour 700 ♦ 16 :40-17:40 Traffic Smithy • - T= 2.8% P=.888 494 TEV=1570 (503) 641-6333 • EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND TIME PERIOD • • • FROM - TO 1 —► 3 'J ,, L► 'l t r► r ,— . L ALL •40 16:00-16:05 2 4 2 1 33 4 1 34 7 5 2 5 100 • 16:05-16:10 7 4 2 2 26 2 0 19 3 21 6 15 107 16:10-16:15 9 4 0 3 31 2 1 25 11 18 7 14 125 16:15-16 :20 2 6 2 0 47 3 2 37 3 13 5 7 127 16:20-16:25 7 1 0 1 31 5 2 41 7 17 7 9 128 16:25-16 :30 5 4 2 0 42 6 2 22 5 10 5 6 109 16:30-16 :35 4 2 0 1 38 5 1 32 7 19 9 10 128 16 :35-16 :40 5 8 0 2 37 3 0 25 8 20 7 6 121 16 :40-16 :45 3 5 1 1 39 3 2 33 • 5 22 7 14 135 . 16:45-16:50 4 2 0 1 29 5 0 37 5 11 8 8 110 16 :50-16:55 6 2 3 2 30 5 5 27 9 15 7 8 119 • 16 :55-17:00 6 2 3 2 27 4 1 28 5 10 6 9 103 17:00-17:05 4 3 2 1 41 3 3 41 13 13 6 13 143 • 17:05-17:10 2 2 1 1 33 7 1 32 10 21 6 16 132 17:10-17:15 3 5 3 - 0 37 2 2 34 3 23 9 23 144 40 17:15-17:20 6 1 1 0 37 7 2 38 6 13 14 9 134 17:20-17:25 5 4 1 0 39 1 2 24 2 25 14 18 135 • 17:25-17:30 4 3 0 1 46 2 1 41 4 17 9 18 146 17:30-17:35 2 6 0 1 40 5 1 31 6 20 10 14 136 40 17:35-17:40 10 4 0 2 39 3 0 37 3 18 5 12 133 17:40-17:45 6 2 1 2 28 3 0 32 3 17 8 6 108 17:45-17:50 4 0 0 2 35 0 0 25 8 10 5 12 101 17:50-17:55 4 4 1 0 24 6 0 31 7 12 4 3 96 40 17:55-18 :00 3 3 0 - 0 34 4 1 28 1 7 9 11 101 II • . • II 40 Total Survey 113 81 25 26 843 90 30 754 141 377 175 266 2921 PHF .86 .75 .47 .6 .87 .73 .56 .92 .63 .84 .68 .78 . 936 % Trucks , 2 .5 4 0 2.5 1.1 0 2 7. 8 3 .2 1. 1 2 .3 2 .5 Stopped Buss 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 0 • Peds 0 1 . 0 0 12 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 . Hourly Totals 16 :00-17:00 60 44 15 16 410 47 17 360 75 181 76 111 1412 16:15-17:15 51 42 17 12 431 51 21 389 80 194 82 129 1499 16 :30-17:30 52 39 15 12 433 47 20 392 77 209 102 152 1550 40 16 :45-17:45 58 36 15 13 426 47 18 402 69 203 102 154 1543 17:00-18:00 53 37 10 10 433 43 13 394 66 196 99 155 1509 II . II II II 41 INTERSECTI MOVEMENT COUNT PEAK HO PORT SW HALL BARD AT SW HUNZIKER/SCOFFI TREET • • T= 2.2% P=.924 • N 492 • DATE OF COUNT: 08/20/02 p i 559 DAY OF WEEK: Tue 40 R 12 433 47 TIME STARTED: 16:00 T TIME ENDED: 18 :00 • H -4-134 1-463 15 - 1.152 T= 9% T= 1.9% 39 —► 4-102 P=.946 P=.844 VOLUME 52 • x209 T��� BY APPROACH 41 I r• P=PHF BY APPROACH 106 —► 163 —► JWHI 20 392 77 Peak Hour 694 • 16:30-17:30 Traffic Smithy • T= 2 .5% P=.879 1489 TEV=1550 (503) 641-6333 EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND 'NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND 41 TIME PERIOD • • • • FROM - TO —► 3 iJ �► 41 I r• j '_ L ALL ALL VEHICLES 16:30-16:45 12 15 1 4 114 11 3 90 20 61 23 30 384 16:45-17:00 16 6 6 5 86 14 6 92 19 36 21 25 332 17:00-17:15 9 10 6 2 111 12 6 107 26 57 21 52 419 17:15-17:30 15 8 2 1 122 10 5 103 12 55 37 45 415 LIGHT TRUCKS (SINGLE UNIT 2 AXLES) 16:30-16:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 2 7 16:45-17:00 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 6 • . 17:00-17:15 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 . 1 0 1 0 7 17:15-17:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 5 S MEDIUM TRUCKS (SINGLE UNIT > 2 AXLES) 16:30-16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 16:45-17:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 • 17:00-17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15-17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 HEAVY TRUCKS (SEMI-TRACTOR TRAILER) • 16:30-16 :45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:45-17:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 • 17:00-17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 17:15-17:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 BICYCLES • 16:30-16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 16:45-17:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 • 17:00-17:15 . 0 0 . 0 .0 .0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15-17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 • PEDESTRIANS CROSSWALK USEAGE ALL • SOUTH WEST EAST NORTH 16:30-16:45 0 2 0 0 2 0 16:45-17:00 0 1 0 0 1 17:00-17:15 0 1 0 0 1 • 17:15-17:30 0 1 0 2 3 • Peak Hour by Movement PHF .81 .65 .63 .6 .89 .84 .83 . 92 .74 . 86 .69 .73 .924 0 % Trucks (all) 0 0 6.7 0 2 .3 2.1 0 2 5.2 1. 9 1 2 . 6 2 .1 % Trucks (M+H) 0 0 .0 . 0 .7 0 0 .5 2.6 - .5 0 0 .5 • Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Hourly Totals 16 :00-17:00 60 44 15 16 410 47 17 360 75 181 76 111 1412 • 16 :15-17:15 51 42. 17 12 431 51 21 389 80 194 82. 129 1499 16 :30-17:30 52 39 15 12 433 47 20 392 77 209 102 152 1550 • 16:45-17:45 58 36 15 13 426 47 18 402 69 203 102 154 1543 17:00-18 :00 53 37 10 10 433 43 13 394 66 196 99 155 1509 4 41_ 11 INTERSECTS TURN MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMAR PORT • SW 72ND AVENUE AT SW HUNZIKER STREET • ♦ T= 2.8% P=.834 N 1831 ♦ DATE OF COUNT: 08/20/02 0 1888 DAY OF WEEK: The R 294 537 0 TIME STARTED: 16 :00 T TIME ENDED: 18 :00 H 4-408 4-I L► �-0 vt 170 L0 T= 3 .3% T= 0% • 0 —► 4-0 P=.719 227 0 P=0. TEV=TOTAL ENTRY VOLUME • * ♦ r T=%TRUCKS BY APPROACH �l �► _ P=PHF BY APPROACH • 397 —_ 114 718 1 1 — Peak Hour CWBT 41 - 1764 ♦ 16:35-17:35 Traffic Smithy T= 1.7% P=. 901 1833 TEV=2061 (503) 641-6333 1 EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND TIME PERIOD FROM - TO —► �J I L. 41 I f► r •— L • i ALL 16:00-16:05 16 0 9 17 49 0 16 51 0 0 0 0 158 16:05-16:10 18 0 12 25 54 0 6 57 0 0 0 0 172 16:10-16:15 7 0 8 29 38 0 10 62 0 0 0 0 154 16:15-16:20 11 0 13 21 52 0 7 52 0 0 0 0 156 16:20-16:25 -10 0 14 20 44 0 6 55 0 0 0 0 149 16:25-16:30 14 0 8 23 45 0 8 48 0 0 0 0 146 16:30-16:35 16 0 9 28 47 0 8 36 0 0 0 0 144 16:35-16:40 20 0 8 14 39 0 6 72 1 0 0 0 160 16:40-16:45 22 0 16 36 51 0 9 49 0 0 0 0 183 16:45-16:50 11 0 12 20 50 0 8 51 0 0 0 0 152 16:50-16:55 22 0 10 22 39 0 7 50 0 0 0 0 150 16:55-17:00 16 0 12 14 41 0 9 59 0 0 0 0 151 17:00-17:05 18 0 9 29 41 0 1 53 0 0 0 0 151 17:05-17:10 24 0 24 17 49 0 14 62 0 0 0 0 190 17:10-17:15 28 0 23 23 41 0 16 67 0 0 0 0 198 17:15-17:20 18 0 21 18 56 0 11 61 0 0 0 0 185 40 17:20-17:25 18 0 19 38 44 0 16 58 0 0 0 0 193 17:25-17:30 15 0 6 42 51 0 6 69 0 0 0 0 189 40 17:30-17:35 15 0 10 21 35 0 11 67 0 0 0 0 159 17:35-17:40 14 0 8 20 41 0 5 63 0 0 0 0 151 40 17:40-17:45 12 0 12 18 34 0 8 64 0 0 0 0 148 17:45-17:50 13 0 6 21 38 0 1 46 0 0 0 0 125 i 17:50-17:55 6 0 7 17 33 0 3 55 0 0 0 0 121 17:55-18 :00 11 0 16 14 58 0 10 35 0 0 0 0 144 1 410 Total Survey 375 0 292 547 1070 0 202 1342 1 0 0 0 3829 PHF .81 0 .63 .73 .89 0 .66 .93 .25 0 0 0 .894 % .Trucks 3.7 0 2.7 4 .4 2 0 4.5 1.3 0 0 0 0 2.5 i Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11 Hourly Totals 16:00-17:00 183 0 131 269 549 0 100 642 1 0 0 0 1875 16.:15-17:15 212 0 158 267 539 0 99 654 1 0 0 0 1930 40 16:30-17 :30 228 0 169 301 549 0 111 687 1 0 0 0 2046 16 :45-17 :45 211 0 166 282 522 0 112 724 0 0 0 0 2017 40 17:00-18 :00 192 0 161 278 521 0 102 700 0 0 0 0 1954 . INTERSECTI7 �� AVENUE MOVEMENT COUNT PEAK •PORT SW SHOE • • T= 2.6%. P=.853 • N 1850 • DATE OF COUNT: 08/20/02 0 856 DAY OF WEEK: Tue • R 301 549 0 TIME STARTED: 16 :00 T TIME ENDED: 18 :00 . H 4-412 4-I L. • • • 16 9 L0 T. 2 .8% T= 096 • 0 —► *-0 P=.787 P=0. 228 Z • j0 TEV=TOTAL P _ CKS BY APPROACH 40 397 �► P=PHF BY APPROACH 397 —► 1 —► CWBT • 1777 111 687 1 Peak Hour • 16:30-17:30 Traffic Smithy • - T= 1.8% P=.903 1799 TEV=2046 (503) 641-6333 • EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND TIME PERIOD • • • . FROM - TO 1 3 .4_1 1 L. 4l � 1÷ j L ALL •• ALL VEHICLES 40 16:30-16:45 58 0 33 78 137 0 23 157 1 0 0 0 487 16:45-17:00 49 0 34 56 130 0 24 160 0 0 0 0 453 dill. 17:00-17:15 70 0 56 69 131 0 31 . 182 0 0 0 0 539 17:15-17:30 51 0 46 98 151 0 33 188 0 0 0 0 567 • LIGHT TRUCKS (SINGLE UNIT 2 AXLES) . 16:30-16:45 3 0 1 3 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 12 16:45-17:00 0 0 1 4 1 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 12 • 17:00-17:15 . 2 0 2 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 10 17:15-17:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 • MEDIUM TRUCKS (SINGLE UNIT > 2 AXLES) '1' 16:30-16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 16:45-17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 17:00-17:15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 17:15-17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 HEAVY TRUCKS (SEMI-TRACTOR TRAILER) 40 16:30-16:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 • 16:45-17:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 17:00-17:15 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 17:15-17:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 BICYCLES 40 16:30-16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 :45-17:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 17:00-17:15 0 0 0 0 1.. 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 1 17:15-17:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 • PEDESTRIANS CROSSWALK USEAGE ALL • SOUTH WEST EAST NORTH 16:30-16:45 0 0 0 0 0 • 16 :45-17:00 0 3 1 0 4 17:00-17:15 0 0 0 0 0 17:15-17:30 0 1 0 0 1 • Peak Hour by Movement PHF .81 0 .75 .77 .91 0 .84 .91 .25 0 0 0 . 902 40 , Trucks (all) 3 .1 0 2.4 4 .7 1.5 0 4 .5 1.3 0 0 0 0 2 .3 Trucks (M+H) .9 0 0 1.3 .4 0 .9 .3 0 0 0 :0 .5 • Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Totals 16 :00-17:00 183 0 131 269 549 0 100 642 1 0 0 0 1875 • 16 :15-17:15 212 0 158 267 539 0 99 654 1 0 0 0 1930 • " 16 :30-17:30 228 0 169 301 549 • 0 111 687 1 0 0 0 2046 16 :45-17 :45 211 0 166 282 522 0 112 724 0 0 0 0 2017 17:00-18 :00 192 0 161 278 521 0 102 700 0 0 0 0 1954 • . • 10. . . • • • el • 0 1k ' 0 l • • • . • . e . • _ _ I . __ • -r-y_.„....<4‹,i__ co„ , ,-- 67-,.z.,/, 2_ • . ___ t„ 6_ • .• A-r -r-f-'-b-c._1(.....c _ • • C-A-ris YA-12-Icc% 44--- c-(1-41.2R--T- 0,— Cao 'Jr- • • 6 _,--2 - - - • • . _ ...._ • l't ii ce • • __ _CL-__4-1 • 3 • 0 11=2-of-.-- S.-Pt1 1 1 S''P n -- c,. if•-- • O r 1 r — v-(ao 0 -2_, _ • • • ___ _ _ __ S S S• • • • O -FP-. QA •\1 0 /../ (,- • , 1-44‘..)1' 0 C_AA-r • • • . 0 • • • • SE -22-2002 17 16 P.01 • • • • • OREGON DEPARTMENT OF • SECTION • • Transportation Development Branch • Mill Creek Office Building • 555 13th Street NE • TRANSPORTATION Salem, OR 97301-4178 • Office Number: (503)986-4240 • FAX Number: (503)986-4249 • • COVER SHEET TELECOPY(FACSIMILE) • DATE: September 2,2002 • • TO: Eric Graves • • CTS Engineers, Inc. COMPANY • • TELEPHONE NUM: 503-690-8080 503-645-5930 • FROM: Sylvia Vogel 503-986-4240 • NAME NUMBER • ODOT/Crash Analysis Unit • MESSAGE: • • •, • • NUMBER OF PAGES 13 (Including This Cover Sheet) • • If you did not receive all the pages FAXed or have any transmission problems,please call • (503) 986-4240 • • • FAXCOV.doc 2/1/98 • • • SEP-02-2002 17 16 P.02 • .ate;. C54412'-'._ Ye on Department of Transportation Transportation Development Branch Mill Creek Office Building • cm-lor John A•Kit'ibaber,MD.,Governor 555 13th Street NE • Salem,OR 97310 • FILE CODE; • September 2, 2002 • • • • • • Eric Graves, P.E. • CTS Engineers,Inc. 3300 NW 211t Terrace • Hillsboro, OR 97124 • • RE: 1) SW Hall B1 @ SW Hunziker St/SW Scoffins St. (Hw 144 MP 5.24-5.26) • 2) SW 72id Ave @ SW Hunziker St. • 3) SW Hunziker St./Between SW Hall Blvd. and SW Wall St. • Dear Mr. Graves: • • Enclosed are the summary and PRC reports you requested for the period of January 1, • 1999 through December 31,2001. • If you have any questions or need additional information please don't hesitate to call. • • Sincere ly, IRO ..c.) i.e(c • Sylvia M.Vogel • Crash Reporting Technician • 503-986-4240 • Enclosure • • • • • • • • ?•r:*.731-03334(10/97) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 9/02/2002 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE 1 I`'7 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING m CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR - REPORT BPSUMS2A C_ SW HAIL BLVD (HW 144)/ HUNZIKER ST/SR SCOFFINS ST 1/1/99 - 12/31/01 NON- PROP. FATAL FATAL DAMAGE CRASHES PEOPLE PEOPLE DRY WET INTER- OFF- YEAR COLLISION TYPE CRASHES CRASHES ONLY TOTAL KILLED INJURED TRUCKS SURF SURF DAY DARK SECTION ROAD 1999 REAR-END 1 1 1 1 1 1999 TURNING MOVEMENTS 1 1 1 1 1 1999 YEAR TOTALS • 2 2 2 2 2 2000 REAR-END 1 1 1 1 1 2000 TURNING MOVEMENTS I 1 2 2 2 2 2 2000 YEAR TOTALS 1. 2 3 2 2 1 2 1 3 FINAL TOTALS 1 4 5 2 2 3 2 3 5 • • • • lD l` N 0 m N I N 0 • I O. w cn • • • • • • • • • • +• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 09/02/2002 C O N T I N U O U S S Y S T E M A C C I D E N T L I S T I N G PAGE 1 SW HALL BLVD (HW 144)/ HUNZIKER ST/SW SCOFFINS ST 1/1/99 - 12/31/01 141, BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HWY O_ INTER OR ROAD- (MEDIAN) TYPE RES- SERIAL DATE/ CHAR/ TYPE/TURN WEATH/ ACC- PARTI- VEH LIC/ NO./ DAY- COUNTY/ SYSTEM/ FIRST/ CONN DIREC .LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ CIPNT/OWNER/ AGE- MOVE/ ERROR/ EVENT/ INVEST TIME CITY PFX-MILEP INTRSCT -RAMP -LOC (LANES) LIGHT CLASS SEVRTY TYPE SEX FR-TO ACTION CAUSE 11290 12/00/00 WASHINGTON MN-ART 1001 INTER 3-LEG CLR E REAR 01 MVOP PRI OR2-Y STRGHT REAR-END NONE FRI 06P TIGARD 0 5.24 1008 N 6 NONE WET DLIT P00 P00 PASS 27 F N S NONE FOL-CLOS 02 UNO4 02 M PSNGR 03 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE PDO PASS 48• M N S STOPPED 10291 11/10/00 WASHINGTON MN-ART 1001 INTER 3-LEG CLR D TURN 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT PAS WRNG NOTREC FRI 10A TIGARD 0 5.24 1008 CN 4 NONE DRY DAY INJ PDO PASS 64 F S N NONE IMP-OVER 02 MVOP PRI OR1-Y TURN-R NONE INJC PASS 39 F S E NONE 03 INJC 10 M PSNGR • 00307 01/15/99 WASHINGTON MN-ART 1001 INTER 3-LEG RAIN E REAR 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT INATTEN NONE FRI 06P TIGARD 0 5.25 1008 N 6 NONE WET DLIT PDO PDO PASS 59 M N S DISTRCTD FOL-CLOS 02 MVOP PRI OR2-Y STOP NONE PDO PASS 40 F N S STOPPED • l0 N .-1 N m N N IS) a In • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • 09/02/2002 U R B A N N O N -S Y S T E M A C C I D E N T L I S T I N .G PAGE SW HALL BLVD OW 149)/ HUNZIKER ST/SW SCOFFINS ST 1/1/99 - 12/31/01 m WASHINGTON COUNTY CITY OF TIGARD D_ SYSTEM/ INTER OR DISTANCE ROAD- (MEDIAN} TYPE RES- SERIAL DATE/ CITY STREET FROM CHAR/ TYPE/TURN WEATH/ ACC- PART/- VEH LIC/ NO./ DAY- FIRST/ INTERSECT DIREC LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ CIPNT/ OWNER/ AGE- MOVE/ ERROR/ EVENT/ INVEST TIME SECOND (FEET) -LOC (LANES) LIGHT CLASS SEVRTY TYPE SEX FR-TO ACTION : CAUSE 10685 12/05/99 STREET NUMBER 1001 MN-ART INTER 3-1EG RAIN H TURN 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT NONE NOTREC SUN 101, STREET NUMBER 1008 CM 4 NONE WET DLIT PDO PDO PASS 33 M S N NONE 02 MVOP PRI OR1-Y TURN-L L IN TRF PDO PASS 26 F N SE NONE IMP-TURN 03 UNO4 01 M PSNGR 04 UNO4 04 F PSNGR 06486 07/17/00 STREET NUMBER 1001 MN-ART INTER 3-LEG CLR H TURN 01 MVOP PRI ORL-Y STRGHT NONE NOTREC MON DJP STREET NUMBER 1008 CM 4 NONE DRY DAY PDO PDO PASS 30 M SE NW NONE 02 MVOP PRI OR1-Y TURN-L L IN TRF PDO PASS 39 F NW S NONE NO-YIELD • • • N• N tti 0 • m CV N Ql (I l i.l (1 *** C O D E S E M P L O Y E D IN P R E V I O U S A C C I D E N T S *** CLASS CODE USED DESCRIPTION 0_ DRIVER ACTION 09 1 DISTRCTD DRIVER ATTENTION DISTRACTED 11 2 STOPPED STOPPED IN TRAFFIC EXCEPT FOR LEFT TURN PED-ACTION NO CODES USED DRIVER ERROR 04 2 L IN TRF LEFT TURN IN FRONT OF ONCOMING TRAFFIC 16 1 INATTEN INATTENTION (AS OF 1997 ACCIDENTS) 26 1 REAR-END FAILED TO AVOID STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE 31 1 PAS WRNG PASSING ON WRONG SIDE PED MOVEMENT NO CODES USED EVENTS NO CODES USED TYPE OF ACCIDENT CODES COLLISION WITH ANOTHER MOTOR VEHICLE IN TRAFFIC COLLISION OF MOTOR VEHICLE WITH: A ENTERING AT ANGLE - ONE VEHICLE STOPPED 1 MOTOR VEHICLE ON B ENTERING AT ANGLE - AIL OTHERS OTHER ROADWAY C FROM SAME DIRECTION - BOTH GOING STRAIGHT 2 PARKED MOTOR VEHICLE D FROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE TURN, ONE STRAIGHT 3 PEDESTRIAN E FROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED 4 RAILROAD TRAIN F FROM SAME DIRECTION - ALL OTHERS (INCL PARKING) 6 BICYCLIST G FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - BOTH GOING STRAIGHT 7 ANIMAL H FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE LEFT TURN, ONE STRAIGHT 8 FIXED OBJECT I FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED 9 OTHER OBJECT J FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ALL OTHERS (INCL PARKING) & OVERTURNED 0 OTHER NON-COLLISION • N • N N N m • • 0 W In • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 9/02/2002 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE N TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR - REPORT EPSUMS2A SW 72ND AVE Q SW HUNZIKER ST 1/1/99 - 12/31/01 NON- PROP. FATAL FATAL DAMAGE CRASHES PEOPLE PEOPLE DRY WET INTER- OFF- YEAR COLLISION TYPE CRASHES CRASHES ONLY TOTAL KILLED INJURED TRUCKS SURF SURF DAY DARK SECTION ROAD 2001 REAR-END 1 4 5 1 5 5 5 2001 YEAR TOTALS 1 4 5 1 5 5 5 FINAL TOTALS 1 4 5 1 5 5 5 • • • • • EL • N N I9 • • • N N I QI n_ UI U) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 09/02/2002 C O N T I N U O U S S Y S T E M A C C I D E N T L I S T I N G PAGE 1 CO SW 32ND AVE @ SW HUNZIKER ST 1/1/99 - 12/31/01 m 144, HEAVERTON-TIGARD HWY INTER OR ROAD- (MEDIAN) TYPE RES- SERIAL DATE/ CHAR/ TYPE/TURN WEATH/ ACC- PARTI- VEH LIC/ NO./ DAY- COUNTY/ SYSTEM/ FIRST/ CONN DIREC LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ CIPNT/ OWNER/ AGE- MOVE/ ERROR/ EVENT/ INVEST TIME CITY PFX-MILEP INTRSCT -RAMP -LOC (LANES) LIGHT CLASS SEVRTY TYPE SEX FR-TO ACTION CAUSE 02202 02/06/01 WASHINGTON MN-ART 1008 INTER 3-LEG CLR E REAR 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT REAR-END NONE TUE 10A TIGARD 0 6.63 5072 S 6 NONE DRY DAY PDO P00 PASS 23 M S N NONE FOL-CLOS 02 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE PDO PASS 26 M S N STOPPED • • • N N N m N N m D_ U) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 90 • • • • • 09/02/2002 U R B A N N O N -S Y S T E M A C C I D E N T L I S T I N G PAGE 1 cn SW 72ND AVE @ SW HUNZIKER ST 1/1/99 - 12/31/01 m WASHINGTON COUNTY CITY OF TIGARD 0- SYSTEM/ INTER OR DISTANCE ROAD- (MEDIAN) TYPE RES- SERIAL DATE/ CITY STREET FROM CHAR/ TYPE/TURN WEATH/ ACC- PARTI- VEH LIC/ NO./ DAY- FIRST/ INTERSECT DIREC LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ . CIPNT/ OWNER/ AGE- MOVE/ ERROR/ EVENT/ INVEST TIME SECOND (FEET) -LOC (LANES) LIGHT CLASS SEVRTY TYPE SEX FR-TO ACTION CAUSE 01967 03/08/01 STREET NUMBER 1008 MN-ART INTER CROSS CLR E REAR 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT REAR-END NONE THU 09A STREET NUMBER 5072 N 6 NONE DRY DAY PDO PDO PASS 54 M N S NONE FOL-CLOS 02 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE PDO PASS 46 F N S STOPPED 08067 09/19/01 STREET NUMBER 1008 MN-ART INTER CROSS CLR E REAR 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT REAR-6ND NONE WED 02P STREET NUMBER 5072 N 6 NONE DRY DAY INJ PDO PASS 48 F N S SUN OTH-IMP 02 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE INJC PASS 32 F N S STOPPED 00469 01/16/01 STREET NUMBER 1008 MN-ART INTER CROSS CLR E REAR 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT REAR-END NONE TUE 09A STREET NUMBER 5072 S 6 NONE DRY DAY PDO PDO PASS 70 F S N HONE FOL-CLOS• 02 MVOP PRT UNK-U STOP NONE PDO PASS 00 0 S N STOPPED 02291 03/20/01 STREET NUMBER 1008 MN-ART INTER CROSS CLR E REAR 01 MVOP PRI UNK-U STRGHT REAR-END NONE TUE 01P STREET NUMBER 5072 S 6 NONE DRY DAY PDO PDO PASS 00 M S N NONE FOL-CLOS 02 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE PDO PASS 24 M S N STOPPED • • • N N• m N N m 0_ W U7 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I• • • • • • • *** C O D E S E M P L O Y E D I N P R E V I O U S A C C I D E N T S *** (SI `-' CLASS CODE USED DESCRIPTION 0_ DRIVER ACTION 11 . 5 STOPPED STOPPED IN TRAFFIC EXCEPT FOR LEFT TURN 26 1 SUN BLINDED BY SUN PED-ACTION NO CODES USED DRIVER ERROR 26 5 REAR-END FAILED TO AVOID STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE PED MOVEMENT NO CODES USED EVENTS NO CODES USED TYPE OF ACCIDENT CODES COLLISION WITH ANOTHER MOTOR VEHICLE IN TRAFFIC COLLISION OF MOTOR VEHICLE WITH: A ENTERING AT ANGLE - ONE VEHICLE STOPPED 1 MOTOR VEHICLE ON B ENTERING AT ANGLE - ALL OTHERS OTHER ROADWAY C FROM SAME DIRECTION - BOTH GOING STRAIGHT 2 PARKED MOTOR VEHICLE D FROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE TURN, ONE STRAIGHT 3 PEDESTRIAN E FROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED 4 RAILROAD TRAIN F FROM SAME DIRECTION - ALL OTHERS {INCL PARKING} 6 BICYCLIST G FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - BOTH GOING STRAIGHT 7 ANIMAL H FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE LEFT TURN, ONE STRAIGHT 8 FIXED OBJECT I FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED 9 OTHER OBJECT J FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ALL OTHERS (INCL PARKING) s OVERTURNED 0 OTHER NON-COLLISION • N N N m CS) N N CS) Q_ w • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • 01110 2/ a DM 0A TRANSPORTATION DE I TRANSPORTATION DATA. SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING .-4 CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR - REPORT EPSUMS2A SW HUNZIKER ST/ BETWEEN SW HALL BLVD 4 SW WALL ST 1/1199 - 12/31/01 NON- PROP. FATAL FATAL DAMAGE CRASHES PEOPLE PEOPLE DRY WET INTER- OFF- YEAR COLLISION TYPE CRASHES CRASHES ONLY TOTAL KILLED INJURED TRUCKS SURF SURF DAY DARK SECTION ROAD 1999 REAR-END 1 1 1 1 1999 YEAR TOTALS 1 1 1 1 • 2001 TURNING MOVEMENTS 1 1 2 1 1 2001 YEAR TOTALS 1 1 2 1 1. • FINAL TOTALS • • 1 1 2 2 2 2 • • • • • lD N N m m N N D. I11 (1) • • • • • • • •.• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 09/02/2002 U R B A N N O N -S Y S T E M A C C I D E N T L I S T I N G PAGE 1 N SW HUNZIKER ST/ BETWEEN SW HALL BLVD & SW WALL ST 1/1/99 - 12/31/01 'i WASHINGTON COUNTY CITY OF TIGARD 0- SYSTEM/ INTER OR DISTANCE ROAD- (MEDIAN) TYPE RES- SERIAL DATE/ CITY STREET FROM CHAR/ TYPE/TURN WRATH/ ACC- PARTY- VEH LIC/ NO./• DAY- FIRST/ INTERSECT DIREC LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ CIPNT/ OWNER/ AGE- MOVE/ ERROR/ EVENT/ INVEST TIME SECOND (FEET) -LOC (LANES) LIGHT CLASS SEVRTY TYPE SEX FR-TO ACTION CAUSE 02589 03/30/99 STREET NUMBER 1008 UR-COL ALLEY 0-LEG CLDY E REAR 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT REAR-END NONE TUE 02P STREET NUMBER 1001 250 SE 8 2 DRY DAY PDO PDO PASS 34 F SE NW NONE FOL-CLOS 02 MVOP PRI OR2-Y STOP NONE PDO PASS 23 M SE NW WAITFORL 01471 02/22/01 STREET NUMBER 1008 UR-COL ALLEY 0-LEG CLR H TURN 01 MVOP PRI NON-Y STRGHT NONE NOTREC THU 04P STREET NUMBER 1001 50 SE 6 4 DRY DAY INJ INJC PASS 19 F SE NW NONE 02 INJC 15 F PSNGR 03 MVOP PRI OR2-Y TURN-I L IN TRF PDO PASS 34 M NW NE ENTER DW NO-YIELD • • • • • cn N N m m N I N m 0_ W (r) • • 'r+* C 0 D E S E M P L O Y E D IN P R E V I O U S A C C I D E N T S *** F) M CLASS CODE USED DESCRIPTION D DRIVER ACTION 12 1 WAITFORL STOPPED FOR LEFT TURN Cc 19 1 ENTER DWY ENTERING ALLEY OR DRIVEWAY 0 O I- PED-ACTION NO CODES USED DRIVER ERROR 04 1 L IN TRF LEFT TURN IN FRONT OF ONCOMING TRAFFIC 26 1 REAR-END FAILED TO AVOID STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE PED MOVEMENT NO CODES USED EVENTS NO CODES USED TYPE OF ACCIDENT CODES • COLLISION WITH ANOTHER MOTOR VEHICLE IN TRAFFIC COLLISION OF MOTOR VEHICLE WITH: A ENTERING AT ANGLE - ONE VEHICLE STOPPED 1 MOTOR VEHICLE ON • B ENTERING AT ANGLE - ALL OTHERS OTHER ROADWAY C FROM SAME DIRECTION - BOTH GOING STRAIGHT 2 PARKED MOTOR VEHICLE D FROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE TURN, ONE STRAIGHT 3 PEDESTRIAN E FROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED 4 RAILROAD TRAIN F FROM SAME DIRECTION - ALL OTHERS (INCL PARKING) 6 BICYCLIST G FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - BOTH GOING STRAIGHT 7 ANIMAL H FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE LEFT TURN, ONE STRAIGHT 8 FIXED OBJECT. I FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED 9 OTHER OBJECT • J FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ALL OTHERS (INC', PARKING) & OVERTURNED • 0 OTHER NON-COLLISION • i CO C� • (N (N fI ()1 (f) • • • • • • • Project 2.035 Tigard Sykart • Accident Analysis Worksheet 1999-2001 • • Intersection: Site Access • Percent Percent • Property Rear End 1 50% • Damage Only 1 50% Angle 0 0% Injury 1 50% Turn 1 50% • Total 2 Other 0 0% • Total 2 • PM Peak Hour 685 • ADT 6,227 Assumed to be PM Peak Hour/11 percent • Accident Rate= (Number of Accidents)/3)/(ADTx 365)*1,000,000 Vehicles • Accident Rate= 0.29 Average number of accidents per million entering vehicles • • Intersection: Hunziker/Hall • Percent Percent • Property Rear End 2 40% • Damage Only 4 80% Angle 0 0% Injury 1 20% Turn 3 60% • Total 5 Other 0 0% • Total 5 • PM Peak Hour 1,592 • ADT 14,473 Assumed to be PM Peak Hour/11 percent IIII Accident Rate= (Number of Accidents)/3)/(ADTx 365)*1,000,000 Vehicles • Accident Rate= 0.32 Average number of accidents per million entering vehicles • • Intersection: Hunziker/78th • • Percent Percent Property Rear End 5 100% • Damage Only 4 80% Angle 0 0% • Injury 1 20% Turn 0 0% Total 5 Other 0 0% • Total 5 • PM Peak Hour 2,070 M ADT 18,818 Assumed to be PM Peak Hour/11 percent • Accident Rate= (Number of Accidents)/3)/(ADTx 365)*1,000,000 Vehicles • Accident Rate= 0.24 Average number of accidents per million entering vehicles • • • • • • • • • • • • • TRIP GENERATION WORKSHEET • RATES • • • - Development: Sykart Indoor Racing (Zone Change) • Size: 70,000 GSF • • 1TE Land Use Code: General Office Building, Code 710 • • Variable: Per 1,000 GSF (G) • • • Total Weekday Trips • T= 11.01x (G) • Enter Exit Total • Vehicle Trips 386 385 771 • Site Distribution 50% 50% . 100% • • • • Weekday AM Peak Hour Trips • T = 1.56x (G) • Enter Exit Total • Vehicle Trips 96 13 109 • Site Distribution 88% 12% 100% • • • • Weekday PM Peak Hour Trips • T = 1.49 x (G) • Enter Exit Total • Vehicle Trips 18 86 104 • Site Distribution 17% 83% 100% • •. • • • • • • • • • • • • • TRIP GENERATION WORKSHEET • RATES •• Development: Sykart Indoor Racing Center • Size: 70,000 GSF • • ITE Land Use Code: Light industrial, Code 110 (6th Edition) • Variable: Per 1,000 GSF (G) • • • • Total Weekday Trips • T = 6.97x(G) Enter Exit Total • Vehicle Trips 244 244 488 • Site Distribution 50% 50% 100% • • • • • Weekday AM Peak Hour Trips • T = 0.92x(G) • Enter Exit Total • Vehicle Trips 56 8 64 • Site Distribution 88% 12% 100% • • • • • Weekday PM Peak Hour Trips • T= 0.98x(G) • Enter Exit Total • Vehicle Trips 8 61 69 • Site Distribution 12% 88% 100% • • • • • • • • • • • • Existing 2002 Traffic Sun Sep 8, 2002 15:02:47 Page 1-1 • Existing Conditions - 2002 PM Peak Hour Scenario Report • Scenario: Existing 2002 Traffic • • Command: Existing • Volume: Existing Conditions Geometry: Default Geometry • Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution • Paths: Default Paths. Routes: Default Routes • Configuration: Default Configuration • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. • • • • • S • • • Existing 2002 Traffic Sun Sep 8, 2002 15:02:47 Page 2-1 • Existing Conditions - 2002 PM Peak Hour • Level Of Service Computation Report • 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** • Intersection #1 SW Hall/Hunziker/Scoffins ******************************************************************************** • Cycle (sec) : 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.746 • Loss Time (sec) : Optimal Cycle: 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 24.8 63 Level Of Service: C • ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound • Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T R • Control: I II II II Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Lanes: 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 II I I II Volume Module: PM Peakl2 411 Base Vol: 20 405 75 50 440 12 15 40 55 210 105 165 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • Initial Bse: 20 405 75 50 440 12 15 40 55 210 105 165 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 411 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 21 426 79 53 463 13 16 42 58 221 111 174 III Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 21 426 79 53 463 13 16 42 58 221 111 174 • PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 411 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 21 426 79 53 463 13 16 42 58 221 111 174 • I II 11 II 1 Saturation Flow Module: 410 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 411 Adjustment: 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.97 0.97 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 0.84 0.16 1.00 0.97 0.03 0.14 0.36 0.50 0.67 0.33 1.00 411 Final Sat. : 1805 1566 290 1805 1842 50 240 640 880 1226 613 1615 I II II II I • Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.27 0.27 0.03 0.25 0.25 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.18 0.18 0.11 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** • Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.36 0.36 0.04 0.39 0.39 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.24 0.24 0.24 Volume/Cap: 0.65 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.65 0.65 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.45 411 Delay/Veh: 68.0 21.2 21.2 63.4 17.2 17.2 44.6 44.6 44.6 27.9 27.9 20.2 User DelAdj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • AdjDel/Veh: 68.0 21.2 21.2 63.4 17.2 17.2 44.6 44.6 44.6 27.9 27.9 20.2 DesignQueue: 1 10 2 2 10 0 0 .1 2 6 3 4 ******************************************************************************** • • • Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. • • • a • • • . • Existing 2002 Traffic Sun Sep 8, 2002 15:02:47 Page 3-1 • Existing Conditions - 2002 PM Peak Hour • Level Of Service Computation Report • 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 SW 78th Ave/Hunziker ******************************************************************************** • Cycle (sec) : 90 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.808 • Loss Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 29.2 Optimal Cycle: 97 Level Of Service: C • ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R i II II II Control: Protected Protected Prot+Permit Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I • Volume Module: PM Peak Base Vol: 120 720 0 0 540 295 185 0 260 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • Initial Bse: 120 720 0 0 540 295 185 0 260 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 411 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 133 800 0 0 600 328 206 0 289 0 0 0 . Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 133 800 0 0 600 328 206 0 289 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • MLF Adj: Final Vol. : 33 00 11.00 18.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 600 328 206 0 289 0 0 0 • I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: 410 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.35 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat. : 1805 1900 0 0 1170 639 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 I I I II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 -0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.08 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.88 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.88 xxxx 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 82.0 9.8 0.0 0.0 25.3 25.3 47.6 0.0 58.3 0.0. 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • AdjDel/Veh: 82.0 9.8 0.0 0.0 25.3 25.3 47.6 0.0 58.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 6 15 0 0 14 8 8 0 12 0 0 0 • ******************************************************************************** . • . • Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. . 4 . • . 410 • • • • • • Existing 2002 Traffic Sun Sep 8, 2002 15:02:47 Page 4-1 • Existing Conditions - 2002 PM Peak Hour • Level Of Service Computation Report 411 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** • Intersection #3 Site Access [ (Modeled as one driveway) ] ******************************************************************************** 4111 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 1.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** • Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound . Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I • Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 411 1 II II II Volume Module: . Base Vol: 0 0 0 10 0 4 3 225 0 0 460 16 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 • Initial Bse: 0 0 0 10 0 4 3 234 0 0 478 16 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . PHF Volume: 0 0 0 10 0 4 3 234 0 0 478 16 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . Final Vol. : 0 0 0 10 0 4 3 234. 0 0 478 16 I II II II 1 • Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx • 1 II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 726 xxxx 486 494 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx 394 xxxx 585 1080 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ,. Move Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx 393 xxxx 585 1080 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx it 11 II I Level Of Service Module: • Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * * * * 0 Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 434 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx • Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 13.6 xxxxx 8.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * B * A * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx 13.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * B * * • • • _ • • . Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. • • • • . • • • 4 • Future 2003 Background TrafSun Sep 8, 2002 15:02:49 Page 1-1 2003 Background Traffic '. Scenario Report • Scenario: Future 2003 Background Traffic Command: Background Volume: Background Geometry: Default Geometry Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation • Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes Configuration: Default Configuration . • . . • • • . • • . • . • a • . • Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. • • 411 • • • • • Future 2003 Background TrafSun Sep 8, 2002 15:02:50 Page 2-1 2003 Background Traffic • Level Of Service Computation Report . 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** • Intersection #1 SW Hall/Hunziker/Scoffins ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec) : 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.776 411 Loss Time (sec) : 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 26.3 Optimal Cycle: 66 Level Of Service: C . ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound • Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II If II I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase . Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II I • Volume Module: PM Peak12 Base Vol: 20 405 75 50 440 12 15 40 55 210 105 165 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 21 421 78 52 458 12 16 42 57 218 109 172 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 21 421 78 52 458 12 16 42 57 218 109 172 411 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 411 PHF Volume: 22 443 82 55 482 13 16 44 60 230 115 181 410 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 22 443 82 55 482 13 16 44 60 230 115 181 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 410 Final Vol. : 22 443 82 55 482 13 16 44 60 230 115 181 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.97 0.97 0.85 . Lanes: 1.00 0.84 0.16 1.00 0.97 0.03 0.14 0.36 0.50 0.67 0.33 1.00 Final Sat. : 1805 1566 290 1805 1842 50 240 640 880 1226 613 1615 • 1 II II II 1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.28 0.28 0.03 0.26 0.26 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.11 . Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.36 0.36 0.04 0.39 0.39 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.24 0.24 0.24 . Volume/Cap: 0.68 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.68 0.68 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.46 Delay/Veh: 74.4 22.5 22.5 69.4 17.9 17.9 48.2 48.2 48.2 29.6 29.6 20.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 74.4 22.5 22.5 69.4 17.9 17.9 48.2 48..2 48.2 29.6 29.6 20.3 III DesignQueue: 1 10 2 2 11 0 1 1 2 6 3 5 ******************************************************************************** • . . Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. ' • • • • • • • i • • Future 2003 Background TrafSun Sep 8, 2002 15:02:50 Page 3-1 • 2003 Background Traffic • Level Of Service Computation Report 410 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** • Intersection #2 SW 78th Ave/Hunziker ******************************************************************************** • Cycle (sec) : 90 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.841 • Loss Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 32.4 Optimal Cycle: 112 Level Of Service: C • ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound • Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R • Control: 1 II II II Protected Protected Prot+Permit Protected I • Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II Volume Module: PM Peak 111 Base Vol: 120 720 0 0 540 295 185 0 260 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 125 749 0 0 562 307 192 0 270 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 125 749 0 0 562 307 192 0 270 0 0 0 411 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 411 PHF Adj: 0.139 90 0.832 90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 0 0 624 341 214 0 300 0 0 0 • Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 139 832 0 0 624 341 214 0 300 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • Final Vol. : 139 832 0 0 624 341 214 0 300 0 0 0 411 I II II H Saturation Flow Module: 411 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 410 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.35 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat. : 1805 1900 0 0 1170 639 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 • I I I II II 1 • Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.53 -0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 • Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.08 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 • Volume/Cap: 0.92 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.92 xxxx 0.00 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 • Delay/Veh: 90.7 10.3 0.0 0.0 29.5 29.5 47.8 0.0 65.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • AdjDel/Veh: 90.7 10.3 0.0 0.0 29.5 29.5 47.8 0.0 65.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 6 16 0 0 15 8 9 0 13 0 0 0 • ******************************************************************************** • . . • Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. • • . • • • • • • Future 2003 Background TrafSun Sep 8, 2002 15:02:50 Page 4-1 • 2003 Background Traffic • Level Of Service Computation Report ' 111 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** • Intersection #3 Site Access [ (Modeled as one driveway)) ******************************************************************************** • Average Delay (sec/veh) : 1.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** • Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound . Movement: I L - T - R 1I L - T - R 11 L - T - R I { L - T - R I • Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include III Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 III 1 II II 11 Volume Module: • Base Vol: 0 0 0 10 0 4 3 225 0 0 460 16 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 • Initial Bse: 0 0 0 10 0 4 3 234 0 0 478 16 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 410 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 10 0 4 3 234 0 0 478 16 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 10 0 4 3 234 0 0 478 16 • Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol. : 0 0 0 10 0 4 3 234 0 0 478 16 ill Critical Gap Module: III Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx III I II II II-- 1 Capacity Module: • Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 726 xxxx 486 494 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx III Potent Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx 394 xxxx 585 1080 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx 393 xxxx 585 1080 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 411 1 11 II II Level Of Service Module: • Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * * * * 4 Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT • Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 434 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 13.6 xxxxx 8.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx • Shared LOS: * * * * B * A * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx 13.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx • ApproachLOS: * B * * • _ 411 • • • • • Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. • • • • 111 • •• • • • Future Buildout - Land-Use Sun Sep 8, 2002 15:02:52 Page 1-1 • 2003 - Full Buildout Light Industrial ITE Code 110 Scenario Report Scenario: Future Buildout - Land-Use 110 Light Industrial Command: Buildout Light Industrial • Volume: Full Buildout -ITE Code 110 Light Industrial . Geometry: Default Geometry Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee • Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution • Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes Configuration: Default Configuration • • . . • • • . . . • . . • • . . • . . • Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. • • • • • • 11 . Future Buildout - Land-Use Sun Sep 8, 2002 15:02:53 Page 2-1 2003 - Full Buildout Light Industrial ITE Code 110 10 Level Of Service Computation Report I 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** II Intersection #1 SW Hall/Hunziker/Scoffins ******************************************************************************** . Cycle (sec) : 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.785 Loss Time (sec) : 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 26.8 II Optimal Cycle: 67 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** IIApproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R 1 II II II I . Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include II Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . Lanes: I 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 II I I II- I , Volume Module: PM Peak12 Base Vol: 20 405 75 50 440 12 15 40 55 220 105 170 5 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 21 421 78 52 458 12 16 42 57 229 109 177 • Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 21 421 78 52 458 12 16 42 57 229 109 177 • User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 • PHF Volume: 22 443 82 55 482 13 16 44 60 241 115 186 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Reduced Vol: 22 443 82 55 482 13 16 44 60 241 115 186 41) PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • Final Vol. : 22 443 82 55 482 13 16 44 60 241 115 186 I II II II I • Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 • Adjustment: 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.97 0.97 0.85 411 Lanes: 1.00 0.84 0.16 1.00 0.97 0.03 0.14 0.36 0.50 0.68 0.32 1.00 Final Sat. : 1805 1566 290 1805 1842 50 240 640 880 1244 594 1615 411 1 II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.28 0.28 0.03 0.26 0.26 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.12 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** • Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.36 0.36 0.04 0.38 0.38 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.25 0.25 0.25 i Volume/Cap: 0.69 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.69 0.69 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.47 Delay/Veh: 76.7 23.2 23.2 71.5 18.3 18.3 49.6 49.6 49.6 29.8 29.8 20.1 • User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 76.7 23.2 23.2 71.5 18.3 18.3 49.6 49.6 49.6 29.8 29.8 20.1 DesignQueue: 1 10 2 2 11 0 1 1 2 6 3 5 ******************************************************************************** • • . . • Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. . . . . All • • • • • Future Buildout - Land-Use Sun Sep 8, 2002 15:02:53 Page 3-1 • 2003 - Full Buildout Light Industrial ITE Code 110 • Level Of Service Computation Report 410 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** • Intersection #2 SW 78th Ave/Hunziker ******************************************************************************** • Cycle (sec) : 90 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.859 Loss Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 36.9 • Optimal Cycle: 130 Level Of Service: D • ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound • Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I • Control: Protected Protected Prot+Permit Protected • Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I • Volume Module: PM Peak Base Vol: 125 720 0 0 540 300 200 0 290 0 0 0 • Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 • Initial Bse: 130 749 0 0 562 312 208 0 302 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 130 749 0 0 562 312 208 0 302 0 0 0 411 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 144 832 0 0 624 347 231 0 335 . 0 0 0 411 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 144 832 0 0 624 347 231 0 335 0 0 0 411 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • Final Vol. : 144 832 0 0 624 347 231 0 335 0 0 0 I II II I I • Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 411 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.36 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat. : 1805 1900 0 0 1163 646 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 • I II II II 1 Capacity Analysis Module: 411 Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.54 -0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** • Green/Cycle: 0.08 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 • Volume/Cap: 0.95 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.95 xxxx 0.00 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 99.2 11.4 0.0 0.0 36.0 36.0 45.5 0.0 69.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 • User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 99.2 11.4 0.0 0.0 36.0 36.0 45.5 0.0 69.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 7 17 0 0 16 9 9 0 14 0 0 0 • ******************************************************************************** • • • Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. • • • • • . • 1 • • 1 . Future Buildout - Land-Use Sun Sep 8, 2002 15:02:53 Page 4-1 1 2003 - Full Buildout Light Industrial ITE Code 110 11 Level Of Service Computation Report . 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************- Intersection #3 Site Access [(Modeled as one driveway) ] ******************************************************************************** . Average Delay (sec/veh) : 2.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include . Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 I II II II I IIVolume Module: . Base Vol: 0 0 0 55 0 20 5 225 0 0 460 22 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 . Initial Bse: 0 0 0 55 0 20 5 234 0 0 478 22 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 55 0 20 5 234 0 0 478 22 111 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 55 0 20 5 234 0 0 478 22 S Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol. : 0 0 0 55 0 20 5 234 0 0 478 22 5 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 111 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx • I II II II I Capacity Module: . Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 733 xxxx 489 500 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx 391 xxxx 583 1074 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx 389 xxxx 583 1074 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II I IIILevel Of Service Module: . Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 427 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx • Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 15.2 xxxxx 8.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * C * A * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx 15.2 xxxxxx xxxxxx . ApproachLOS: * C * * . • • • • Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. • • • II • • 0 • Future Buioldout - Land UseSun Sep 8, 2002 15:02:55 Page 1-1 • • 2003 - Full Buildout General Office ITE Code 710 • Scenario Report Scenario: Future Buioldout - Land Use 710 General Office • Command: Buildout General Office • Volume: Full Buildout -ITE Code 710 General Office . Geometry: Default Geometry Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee . Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution • Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes • Configuration: Default Configuration • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. • .. • • 0 • Future Buioldout - Land UseSun Sep 8, 2002 15:02:56 Page 2-1 • 2003 - Full Buildout General Office ITE Code 710 • Level Of Service Computation Report • 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** • Intersection #1 SW Hall/Hunziker/Scoffins ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec) : 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.798 Loss Time (sec) : Optimal Cycle: 16 (Y+R =. 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 27.5 68 Level Of Service: C • . ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L T - R L - T R L - T - R • I II II II- I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase • Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 411 I II II II- I Volume Module: PM Peak12 Base Vol: 20 405 80 55 440 12 15 40 55 225 105 175 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 411 Initial Bse: 21 421 83 57 458 12 16 42 57 234 109 182 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Initial Fut: 21 421 83 57 458 12 16 42 57 234 109 182 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 22 443 88 60 482 13 16 44 60 246 115 192 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 22 443 88 60 482 13 16 44 60 246 115 192 411 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: . 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. : 22 443 88 60 482 13 16 44 60 246 115 192 411 1 II II II Saturation Flow Module: 411 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.97 0.97 0.85 411 Lanes: 1.00 0.84 0.16 1.00 0.97 0.03 0.14 0.36 0.50 0.68 0.32 1.00 411 Final Sat. : 1805 1547 306 1805 1842 50 240 640 880 1253 585 1615 I II II II 1 • Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.29 0.29 0.03 0.26 0.26 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.20 0.20 0.12 • Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.36 0.36 0.04 0.38 0.38 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.25 0.25 0.25 • Volume/Cap: 0.68 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.68 0.68 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.48 Delay/Veh: 75.8 24.0 24.0 71.7 18.1 18.1 51.9 51.9 51.9 30.8 30.8 20.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • AdjDel/Veh: 75.8 24.0 24.0 71.7 18.1 18.1 51.9 51.9 51.9 30.8 30.8 20.2 DesignQueue: 1 10 2 2 11 0 1 1 2 7 3 5 • ******************************************************************************** 4 • • • Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. • • • 411 • • • Future Buioldout - Land UseSun Sep 8, 2002 15:02:56 Page 3-1 . 2003 - Full Buildout General Office ITE Code 710 • Level Of Service Computation Report . 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** 0 Intersection #2 SW 78th Ave/Hunziker ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec) : 90 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.867 • Loss Time (sec) : , 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 39.5 Optimal Cycle: 141 Level Of Service: D • ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound • Movement: L - T R L T R L T R L - T - R S I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Prot+Permit Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II Volume Module: PM Peak Base Vol: 130 720 0 0 540 300 205 0 305 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 135 749 0 0 562 312 213 0 317 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 135 749 0 0 562 312 213 0 317 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 150 832 0 0 624 347 237 0 352 0 0 0 Ilk Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 150 832 0 0 624 347 237 0 352 0 0 0 i PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. : 150 832 0 0 624 347 237 0 352 0 0 0 411 1 II II II I Saturation Flow Module: 411 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 i Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.36 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 411 Final Sat. : 1805 1900 0 0 1163 646 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 1 II II II 1 • Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.54 -0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 IIICrit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.09 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 • Volume/Cap: 0.97 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.97 xxxx 0.00 0.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 11/ Delay/Veh: 103.1 11.9 0.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 44.5 0.0 72.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • AdjDel/Veh: 103.1 11.9 0.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 44.5 0.0 72.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 7 17 0 0 16 9 9 0 14 0 0 0 ******************************************************************************** • 4 • Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. w 4 • • 411 • ! • 0 • Future Buioldout - Land UseSun Sep 8, 2002 15:02:56 Page 4-1 • 2003 - Full Buildout General Office ITE Code 710 • Level Of Service Computation Report • 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** • Intersection #3 Site Access [ (Modeled as one driveway) ) ******************************************************************************** • Average Delay (sec/veh) : 2.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: C • ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound • Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I • Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled • Rights: Include Include Include. Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 • 1 II II II I Volume Module: • Base Vol: 0 0 0 75 0 25 7 225 0 0 460 30 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 • Initial Bse: 0 0 0 75 0 25 7 234 0 0 478 30 • Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Initial Fut: 0 0 0 75 0 25 7 234 0 0 478 30 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 75 0 25 7 234 0 0 478 30 • Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Final Vol. : 0 0 0 75 0 25 7 234 0 0 478 30 Critical Gap Module: • Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx • I II II II I Capacity Module: • Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 741 xxxx 493 508 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx • Potent Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx 386 xxxx 580 1067 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx 384 xxxx 580 1067 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx • I II II II 1 Level Of Service Module: • Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * * * * • Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT • Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 420 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 16.2 xxxxx 8.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx • Shared LOS: * * * * C * A * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx 16.2 xxxxxx xxxxxx • ApproachLOS: . * C * * • • 0 r • • • Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. • • • • di • •• • • • • Future Buioldout - Indoor RSun Sep 8, 2002 15:02:58 Page 1-1 • 2003 - Full Buildout Sykart Indoor Racing Center • - Scenario Report IPScenario: Future Buioldout - Indoor Raceway • Command: Buildout Sykart Volume: Full Buildout Sykart • Geometry: Default Geometry Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee • Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation • Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths • Routes: Default Routes Configuration: Default Configuration • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. • • • • • • • • Future Buioldout - Indoor RSun Sep 8, 2002 15:02:59 Page 2-1 • 2003 - Full Buildout Sykart Indoor Racing Center • Level Of Service Computation Report • 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) . • ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 SW Hall/Hunziker/Scoffins • ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec) : 60 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.790 • Loss Time (sec) : 16 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 27.0 • Optimal Cycle: 67 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** • Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L Movement: - T - R L T R L T R L - T - R • I II II II Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase • Rights: Include Include Include Include • Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 411 1 II II II 1 Volume Module: PM Peak12 • Base Vol: 20 405 80 55 440 12 15 40 55 215 105 165 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 • Initial Bse: 21 421 83 57 458 12 16 42 57 224 109 172 • Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Initial Fut: 21 421 83 57 458 12 16 42 57 224 109 172 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 22 443 88 60 482 13 16 44 60 235 115 181 • Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Reduced Vol: 22 443 88 60 482 13 16 44 60 235 115 181 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. : 22 443 88 60 482 13 16 44 60 235 115 181 • I II II II Saturation Flow Module: • Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.97 0.97 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 0.84 0.16 1.00 0.97 0.03 , 0.14 0.36 0.50 0.67 0.33 1.00 • Final Sat. : 1805 1547 306 1805 1842 50 240 640 880 1234 603 1615 I II II 1I--- I • Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.29 0.29 0.03 0.26 0.26 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.11 • Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** • Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.36 0.36 0.04 0.39 0.39 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.24 0.24 0.24 Volume/Cap: 0.68 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.68 0.68 0.79 0.79 , 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.46 • Delay/Veh: 73.6 23.3 23.3 69.6 17.8 17.8 50.5 50.5 50.5 30.6 30.6 20.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • AdjDel/Veh: 73.6 23.3 23.3 69.6 17.8 17.8 50.5 50.5 50.5 30.6 30.6 20.3 DesignQueue: 1 10 2 2 11 0 1 1 2 6 3 5 • ******************************************************************************** • • • • • Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. . • • • • 1111 • • • Future Buioldout - Indoor RSun Sep 8, 2002 15:02:59 Page 3-1 • 2003 - Full Buildout Sykart Indoor Racing Center • Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) • ******************************************************************************** • Intersection #2 SW 78th Ave/Hunziker ******************************************************************************** • Cycle (sec) : 90 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.852 Loss Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 33.8 • Optimal Cycle: 118 - Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** • Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound • Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II II II I • Control: Protected Protected Prot+Permit Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include • Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 • I II II II 1 • Volume Module: PM Peak Base Vol: 125 720 0 0 540 300 190 0 265 0 0 0 • Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 130 749 0 0 562 312 198 0 276 0 0 0 • Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Initial Fut: 130 749 0 0 562 312 198 0 276 0 0 0 • User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 • PHF Volume: 144 832 0 0 624 347 220 0 306 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Reduced Vol: 144 832 0 0 624 347 220 0 306 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. : 144 832 0 0 624 347 220 0 306 0 0 0 II II II I • Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 • Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 • Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.36 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat. : 1805 1900 0 0 1163 646 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 • I II II II Capacity Analysis Module: 411/ Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.54 -0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** • Green/Cycle: 0.09 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 • Volume/Cap: 0.93 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.93 xxxx 0.00 0.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 92.7 10.4 0.0 0.0 31.5 31.5 47.7 0.0 67.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 • User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 92.7 10.4 0.0 0.0 31.5 31.5 47.7 0.0 67.3 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 • DesignQueue: 7 16 0 0 15 8 9 0 13 0 0 0 ******************************************************************************** • • w 0 Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. • • • • • • III Future Buioldout - Indoor RSun Sep 8, 2002 15:02:59 Page 4-1 • 2003 - Full Buildout Sykart Indoor Racing Center . Level Of Service Computation Report • 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** . Intersection #3 Site Access [ (Modeled as one driveway)] • ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 1.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: B • ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound • Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R • I II II II Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled • Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 . • 1 II II II I Volume Module: • Base Vol: 0 0 .0 17 0 7 6 225 0 0 460 23 • Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 17 0 7 6 234 0 0 478 23 • Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Initial Fut: 0 0 0 17 0 7 6 234 0 0 478 23 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • PHF Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • PHF Volume: 0 0 0 17 0 7 6 234 0 0 478 23 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Final Vol. : 0 0 0 17 0 7 6 234 0 0 478 23 Critical Gap Module: • Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 411 I II II II 1 4111 Cnflict Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 736 xxxx 490 501 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx • Potent Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx 389 xxxx 582 1073 xxxx xxxxx .xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx 388 xxxx 582 1073 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx • 1 II II II I Level Of Service Module: . Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * * * * • Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT • Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 429 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 13.9 xxxxx 8.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx • Shared LOS: * * * * B * A * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx 13.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx • ApproachLOS: * B * * • • • • . • • Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CTS ENGINEERS, INC. • • • . • 411 iii • • • 2.035 Tigard Sykart September 6, 2002 Site Access • Buildout Conditions (70,000 GSF Office Use) • Right Turn Lane Criterion • 800 • SEE • NOTE • 700 • • 600 • d • C • I- 500 4 • d WB SW Hunziker • _� • j 400 • >45 mph • <45 mph • • m 300 • 200 • • \--"\� • 100 • • 0 ♦ • 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 Right Turn Volume • NOTE: If there is no right turn lane,a shoulder needs to be provided. If this intersection is in a rural area and is connected to a public street,a right turn lane is needed. • • Right Turn Criterian Right-Turn Volume Design Hour Volume Minimum Criteria • Approach (vph) (vph per Lane) (Right Turns-vph) Criterion Met • • • WB SW Hunziker _ 30 508 46 If Speed>45MPH • • • crs Engineers, Inc. • • • • • S • • 2.035 Tigard Sykart • September 6, 2002 . Site Access • Buildout Conditions(70,000 GSF Office Use) • Left Turn Lane Criterion • 1000 -• • _ • . • 800 • • � m R O o _1 • c a 600 v m • _ C i , > _ '• 4 > • fZ 0 400 EB SW Hunzilcer 0. • o • • 200 ' • • • • 0 • 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 • —r>55 mph Left-Turn Volumes • --45 mph (Design Hour Volumes) • •-•----y <35 mph • Left Turn Criterion S Opposing Plus Left Turns Advancing Volumes Minimum Criteria • Approach (vph) (vph/Lane) (Left Turns-vph) Criterion Met • • EB SW Hunzilcer 7 375 38 NO • • • • . CtS • Engineers,Inc. • • . • a • . . • •• • June 14, 1999 • ' Joanna Spencer • City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, WA 98188 • • RE: Traffic Impact Analysis—Sykart Race Track • TRANSPORTATION • CONSULTING Dear Joanna: • NORTHWEST Per your request,Transportation Consulting Northwest (TCN) is pleased • a division of TCN,Inc. to submit this traffic impact analysis (TIA) for the proposed development of the Sykart Race Track on West Valley Highway in Tukwila,WA as • shown on the vicinity map,Figure 1. • • 1607 E. Main St According to the preliminary site plan shows the proposed tenant • Auburn, WA 98002 improvement to include conversion of an existing 44,800 SF former • warehouse located in the CPL building at 17450 West Valley Highway in Tukwila, WA. Access for the site will be via two existing driveways onto • West Valley Highway. The existing parking lot has 62 parking spaces. The • existing site is shown in Figure 2. • Based upon our discussions and the preliminary site plan along with • discussions with City staff,the following Scope of Services is necessary to • ensure quick project approval by the City. • • Scope of Study • The following were evaluated: • • Trip generation,distribution and assignment will be developed. • • LOS analysis study area intersections will be determined. • • Safety analysis intersections and roadway segments will be • determined • • A proposal for Phase II TIA (if needed) will be determined. • • • • Trip Generation • Former Warehouse Trip generation for the former warehouse site is estimated using data from • the sixth edition of Trip Generation. This report published by the Institute • of Transportation Engineers (ITE) compiles measured trip generation data • from different land use types from locations across the US. OPh (253) 931-0506 Fax (253) 939-6938 �tmiller©tcninc.com .tcninc.com • • Sykart Race Track TIA • • • • • ITE Land Use Code (Warehouse) using 1,000 SF as the independent variable was selected as the • appropriate method of determining the trip generation for the site. A copy of the relevant pages • from Trip Generation is attached. • As shown in Table 1, two methods of determining the trip generation are available: rate and equation. Using the equation method, the former warehouse is estimated to have generated 40 ID PM peak hour trips while the rate method estimates a trip generation of 21 PM peak hour trips. • • • • %Vi s:a:<�`="Srrsi '+z• - - _ ,',4i� '-z'."s--ry.' °•.K.rt•-. ..y=�:.F_:rG':.P.�t..,-_�.:�;...r:�';'^'`�':;::a::�. _ _ ra,.'tt.+�,y3?;.t,V-;h�dy�,;� '�_ �S.'1�.`- •?;{;.� °�,.7 .', `' t :� .� .r, : < �.z- i�,.w-' !;r•r ^ .'v"-•�•.:c.r;`t:..�,f',,- ,. 'i "-:v.� .a aft �"#:4a;• :n «sr .-z, r.?.. ,-'`�'`k2t„s �.:�: t;:�!'la�.�;��:::_ S _ ,'; '...;ii�:••'y. •a.'k': t .`p;3n . r1�?�jt `•41Y, 'Y � w. �$�,.a. = =�F'•.4o£ � �T:.�it%r:+'e.75.,!w .;.�. 1 .�{- ♦ i • _' ;;k "=: '}-..'� {,,. :fit..- 'F{�f.. ,.•1t�?Y^” Z�a"��:•r-,xM''�s,vT� >y��Fr ti sa. �' i°..c _ ys..av �,x. • f +s', 'are I otise. = u o; K rl .ue 'atiQ0. ;:. x::, : - • �.}� h µ ?. s: ; :. _ r_.., :� . i'S.:.-u Y }4fiz4.-i- ,-$5 ;{>;k.,.q:M1.. .�: H_ +Y� rt c' �•.;••e': 7'i.'-a". .'`.'R LfJ. r's - #!Y. �- Q0. • Total Enter Exit • •. Use LUC KSF Rate Trips % Trips % Trips Warehouse(Rate Method) 150 40.800 0.51 21 24% 5 76% 16 • Warehouse(Equation Method) 150. 40.800 Eqn._ 40 24% 10 76% 30 • • • Proposed Race Track •• Since no ITE published trip generation rates were available for this racetrack land use, TCN performed a study of an existing similar race cart track. City staff concurred with this approach • for estimating the trip generation of the Sykart project. • • The study property is•the 40,000 SF"Grand Prix Raceway" located in Fife, WA as shown in • Figure 2. This land use is the same type of kart racing and is marketed to corporate customers in • the same manner as is proposed by Sykart. The location is near the I-5 corridor, with good • freeway access available. In addition, the surrounding land uses are similar. Although the Sykart site will have a slightly larger track size, the number of racers during peak hours will be the • .roughly the same as at the Grand Prix Raceway, so the trip generation of the two sites will be • very similar. • TCN used technicians to observe the driveways and surrounding area of the track and determine • the noon, PM peak hour and evening trip generation rate. The data from this study is attached. Table 2-shows the observed data for a noon, commute PM hour, and late Saturday night period. • This Saturday night period is projected by Sykart to be their highest number of customers. IP • • • • • • • Ms. Joanna Spencer Page 2 • • • • • x • • • • Sykart Race Track TIA • ; a •`` - _ , t _-= >t y4 _-E Y:..3 YT1 T�a- GrandRaceway T :: ne rad -Get • Total Enter Exit • Period Trips % Trips % Trips • Noon Peak(12:00- 1:00 PM) 10 70% 7 30% 3 PM Commute Peak(4:45 - 5:45 PM) 22 50% 11 50% 11 • Saturday Evening Peak(9:00- 10:00 PM) 42 _ 52% _ 22 48% 20 • The trip generation data is Table 2 shows the proposed project will have a PM peak hour trip • generation that is only half that of the equation based trip generation of the forrner warehouse • use of this site (22 vs. 40). If the rate method is used, then the PM peak hour trip generation is virtually identical to the former warehouse use (22 vs. 21). In either case, there are no • transportation system impacts, and therefore no nexus for assessing mitigation proportionate • fairshare costs of transportation projects. • • Access S A site inspection of the existing access points was conducted. The sight distance onto West • Valley Highway is unobstructed and will present no safety problems. No changes to the existing • driveway location or configuration are planned., • • . Parking • TCN Technicians also observed the parking accumulation during the same traffic count period • and found the results shown in Table 3. During the noon peak there were a maximum of 7 cars. • During the PM commute peak there were 14 parked vehicles. The maximum observed parking was in the late Saturday evening period and was 20 parked vehicles. • • . . Grand Rzix='R1a.,cewayParking Generation:::, " • Maximum • Period Parking Noon Peak(12:00 1:00 PM) 7 • PM Commute Peak(4:45 - 5:45 PM) 14 • Saturday Evening Peak(9:00- 10:00 PM) 20 • 0 • . • • • Ms. Joanna Spencer Page • . • • • • • Sykart Race Track TIA • • The Sykart site has space for parking 62 cars on site. This is more than three times the peak • parking observed at the Grand Prix Raceway site which occurred during the late Saturday night • period. In addition, the Sykart site also has the ability to gain additional parking space from adjacent properties that are owned by the same owner as the Sykart site. The owner has indicated • his willingness to provide this if needed. • In summary, no significant increase in trip generation will result from the conversion of the • warehouse into the Sykart Race Track. The parking available on site is more than adequate for • the parking needs of the Sykart Race Track. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. • • • • Sincerely, • TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING NORTHWEST 411 fkiz-g<N • • Timothy Miller, PE • Principal • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • Ms. Joanna Spencer Page 4 • • • • ' • • • • • - i • . • l • - • • 4 • 11450 17 - V . � • mousy- LDO • • . • • • . • r____-____L=1:1 s . • • 1 (51 tia'P , ' :-____ I : .0• • • IMOsr: ,,,46 [D • t49 6",120 • ‘444; • c+ I�c�lEI MI 11) • . 1d-14A---- . c ..,..' . . . -41"1111" . 1 • Par -a sUa s . -tern- • lam. • • • . • • • • • • • TRANSPORTATION • - CONSULTING Figure 2 • f N O R T H W E S T Existing Site Plan Sykart Race Track • a • • • ' A • • N • • • • !/i•IS , • TRADE . S`...-^ ,?:r W "fit°e...i. FU '' ,. • ;;,,'...:1,...1.11:',2:,,i.' W g��} .:a i� $ } ih - c r 4�>r a ;^x" � :75n s n -ors i .f : <f f'r`i. A r/„4,<- i_ -:S Y�I. t— f r ra' o- x yt ▪.151.7 at, `r.�t'.1...;.::::,'''.'....',.. ''=` G `•. +i.r:,,,,r t r;:r.▪,,--..3;,,,,,--..> , .-,,,z4,,,,,,-,t,,,,,,,.: or s;_-3" r 'nvf a�x r , E • �-. ',.tt�'.ikf` 4• i<x '4ricY+. ��v-'" �' s: ,x r, -,-.344-... `°Y- { ti �' r• S .-1- ', �,,..s r N .Q 1',.,S a }4.E.. �' +c ffi...tl ,w,- ;N. ? ..�,' 7,;.'?.1.,‘,,,,,,,,,,,..',,-„,..v•-••' lows;:''In q. i. �8 ,F•m Hr:'S1�'� ti. AI Rr X Ifs s ,..4.41.1*.;u , rr cf n5 i ,:7 r7. „ x'(. F ,3.3 `� f }' r,+"'° sa': 3�7 <""} ". <}�, ^r`Y 4 l t 'fi 3,,+ ;7. .n• ..._ _ -.._.._ _...r y .R sata`a�_ ,,.w. h, -x s 1 Y k �Y +.c k ..Y . "5 >a v. ,� 7 E DR.E>_1 - - - '.=~rI36c,�;Y t...+,�, f- z^7'�£ z ';Y 'N��r'' +.` n ?� n 1 �t. r su -iA� -/,?..,.,..-• 27, Si • F .h, kq,, >~ ,'� ^ 4v X ., 1 �X.4.,. s yv` :o �J..' n-` ._ •• x w z� . e` ' 'f j"v '�^'uc�';',�$�+'3,. i*y .' �r r ri. ; Da y`�. 1:4`,9-♦ r yr<'rv.a .;e:� rrq�ua YS S y '* SHr yr.,,,;«'` 4' GiC Sit %.',+aj . -. • • • . . 0 Grand Prix Raceway 2105 Frank Albert Road E. 0 Fife, WA 98424 • Weekday Noon • II. • Volumes • Period Ending Enter Exit Total Parked • 11:15AM 1 1 2 5 • 11:30 AM 0 1 1 4 11:45 AM 0 2 2 3 • 12:00 PM 0 0 0 3 • 12:15 PM 3 2 Elligi$: 4 • 1230 PM 1 1 ViiiM 4 • 1245 PM 1 0 V-10 t ,.. i4 ..z 5 • 1:00 PM 2 011:1T:;U:ilraVid<— Peak Parking • 7 3 10 <— Peak Hour Volumes • • - Weekday PM Commute • I I • Volumes • Period Ending Enter Exit Total Parked • 4:15 PM 0 0, 0 . 2 • 4:30 PM 1 0 1 3 4:45 PM 3 1 4 5 • 5:00 PM 8 4,-:.!FA; 12 • 5:15 PM 3 1 Efga rims<— Peak Parking • 530 PM 0 1 Ma 13 • 545 PM 0 8 Oa . • - - 5 • 6:00 PM 3 3 6 5 • 11 11 22 <— Peak Hour Volumes • 0 Saturday Evening III ' I fil Volumes • Period Ending Enter Exit Total Parked • 915 PM 5 2 MIRA 18 • 930 PM 1 9 WM: 10 945 PM 13 3 4gatig ammo <— Peak Parking • 1 0 0 0 P M 3 6 : f 17 • 10:15 PM 1 0 1 18 • 10:30 PM 1 1 2 18 • 10:45 PM 1 5 6 14, • 11:00 PM 2 0 2 16 • . 22 20 42 <— Peak Hour Volumes • a RE ± APFL1CAnQ /V CQNF6RNC 'E NOTES . • _YbY";- «I-.yh,....ri'�^ '�•,�.�_- "�3!?-'i�.iCe'�:�hC3 T.T�.+'!".lvl."�t� �i ms's'_4i':x:Rl'��'c� ^-i?ti��°$�+-' ::C?`:,x.:: - '? � � -_ ^rs•',=: 5.i_..;�a'_ Sq� .<!:ti R'±i+'y .--.`+' t+ A _ 7 } ai .r r ry .T w . . i'..;.. ..:.. -. .... -.-. :,-.., �....;.,'r_�._s'.._. T3.:''==-. '�" ..1��ii; �jam. f� ......� ��.�.: i.,..............._E i,„ ;.,,...}, :::-.. „..;�„..?` �-3:? -.h'h '�K:- .,Y;.`' •,}' �'r�v”.a�.` 4.F:�1- :,'''k--•iyY.�,;:r"<:'h„�. �\ 40 �.....�,:•+..':_:..: ....A �-,:�•.r.�s.< .i' _ - i' C ..#u�.'."'�_%^_`/+• ..r��'Y:2`�., cn_vS`yi....M; -.;l!v�...y, ..11 .?C ;fir,, .y� 5 r Y",ry�:-arm �. �g ..r.:„ ,Y:c t-v.-.._•.n....��..rt jl - <'.:vr �� '=i,;�tiii .�< . - _ ' t � g n•�', „•6`st.c'r'_.. -" -- - ' -°>:.-•._r.�••'•�t. _ -_........:..�-fir"" ...�r.? + > .. �' •v � � «: � 1 �?F �;• '-, �7.::..:._ ErfY:OP=TIQA .tO�eQOtf . s si:�?.:5":r4°';:.'?''`.ti:`�i7.C}i•�_'M�:A.�•�•�'::.'_, :;3 a —' rY? :3 Tif I i ^}' V. 4<.e,. �.r .ky F. :.F..Sds "'�--"�i N"_:t •..` wr ^ r ., REAPPL :CATION_ 0 FE:RE=NCEroNOTES. ..••:.'.t •..�:_�. „a.,:,. "5 s.:...:.._.•.0�.?'�^p- .,,,.�--•- :-:s5+",���!y:.t-E:;f,.?:t;�r- ...-.:q ,r'^� '.. ..r.d ...-r. ...,.::..s t4�%:`,,.ayes ea+:'�u ...,e_.�.F.s-.,-.,.. :..a,.-�'-<:ri!:..::t}+i.--'.�'.:b.;-„+...__::s;-.;: .,�,-sTi.,S"al::s:��','.���z',.,s-.�” S't L.� f,.:S.+^.iw'.A ji'uaY:-.��i�.c•�.-.- :'i.'J✓ - _ '_.:.:.t. .}vik `..,�..e v r.".::::3.4;-.-:.:.-...< •� L-'.?tt .1 _ �..ri _ SATt:SU .y1 ...'t?e..°_'€-�'� $'y7.kvg) (J . '� _ ..««�/-�:. .7Y':'y„ c;... s,S!_. t(-. <;+�.r nk�' ..2.f _.,;Y t.,-_'.-.`- �r•;i}!.'r c, �-s' r� r.��=-'�>t, - "'�-,•. �.; �:;` - �-;�" ::;=�: ,�•':-• 3 - ,spti"� S(ra :A=Better.,�ottimu" _ ,5...✓.. ter. - - s:1�=:�M'R•,rA :`7�;„ _ �E.:� t. ierK '.d •-t.?'; -.�:,�;�;¢'.,'',.� =�t:�-;.s�'�,-a:�r ,; ,c,°� �"��:"��+� re'= "•�I�cat<on-AMeehn =flotes�are�Valld for=�Slx' b` �:.'�-t�.�:' 3'�. ,�� -{: :���s x�;�•. f'L : .�...t xMonths r `.<.'a:;a��i.•i.s,:�s.:..u,...-s�°iilf�us`d�.""X":=;zi:.::.=r.:•usrm»:e ...,.<;..9-�•s �ata-:;�:��kzc »,..„..•_,. ,.�::?d':,.:�`r._='�. ..�-r..,�. ems-.,.::__,..,.::;.';�.�a .3sa NON-RESIDENTIAL MGCE P/ VC? Z APPLICANT: �r S. t7 AGENT: . Phone:j ) Phone: (sea) PROPERTY LOCATION: - ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: 8 20• S Gtr f�u�yZ��lc-,ems • TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): a-3/0/ 8C - NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: �cz PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: 7-G. CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM(C.I.T.)AREA: • ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18‘, a ] MINIMUM LOT SIZE sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: ft. Max. building height: 4/5 ft. Setbacks Front 30 ft. Side ePA57 ft. Rear o s- t. Corner 2,0 ft. from stmt. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: &'5 % Minimum Ian scaped or natural vegetation area: AS %. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] •THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S), AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be • accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 NON-Residential ApplEadoniPlanning Division Section t • • la NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.390) The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. (1K1 ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.105 and 18.7651 Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: VI WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.705.030) WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. ❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.730) > STREETS: feet from the centerline of > LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. ➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. ❑ SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.RJ BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: > A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; > All actual building setbacks will be at least half('h)of the building's height; and > The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7451 In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only'be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. - feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQU RED ALONG: • " LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.705) STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. C.EL RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. ,LPARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.165.0401 REQUIRED parking for this type of use: s i o0c' Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): - • SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: max. ' Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: D Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. > Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three(3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: > All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. > BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. CKL LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.165.080) Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON-Residential Apptication/Planning Division Section !CYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code ction 18.765) • BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. SENSITIVE LANDS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7151 The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- . application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. ❑ STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.715.080.0) When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.0. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. CLEARWATER SERVICES[CWS]BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to B a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3) LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ST-ANDARDS MANUAUR ES OLUTION &ORDER 96-44 96-D44 . r F rt M" 9fzi t > -n-W,y.,- SLOPE D3AC NTH r DTE tOF YEG TED; " Z .eu "BENS 3E A -1) F NIR0 ; � ENITV RE - , CORRIDORPE: ♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% • 10 to <50 acres 15 feet ► >50 to <100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet ♦ Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres ♦ Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% 30 feet + 10 to <50 acres • >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure ♦ Rivers,streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine(break in ♦ Natural lakes and ponds <25%slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine' 4Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary,and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NON-Residential Apphcatia lRanning Division Section • • Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. a SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7801 SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. DgIt TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; �1 Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; ► Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. T4VIITIGATION (Refer to Code Section 18390.06011 s. REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 NON-Residential AppficationlPlanning Division Section • • i ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: �► The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1)or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. . ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. • CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7951 The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. ❑ WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT (Refer to Code Section 18.197.0301 The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions require that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs). ➢ . Major streams in Tigard include FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS)AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, Deny Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 NON-Residen5al ApplcatoNPlanning Division Section • • D The standard -TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. D The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. D ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (induding adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Cleanwater Services (CWS) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. El RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.197.1001 The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise'prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. • TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetation Study required by Section 18.797.100 that demonstrates all of the following: D Native plant species currently cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; D The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; D That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.797.100 regulating removal of native plant species; D That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and D The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. ❑ ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.810.060] MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2% TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the • parcel is less than 1%times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS - 18.330(Conditional Use) 18.620(Tgard Triangle Design Standards) _ 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) _ 18.340(Director's Interpretation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) _ 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) - 18.350(Planned Development) 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) _ 18.780(Signs) _ 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) _ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) 18.370(varianceslAdjusbnents) 18.715(Density computations) _ 18.790(Tree Removal) 18.380(Zoning Map/red Amendments) 18.720(Design Compahbilty Standards) - 18.795(visual Clearance Areas) - 18.385(Miscellaneous Pemrits) 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) _ 18.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) DL 18.390(Decision Making Proceduresnmpad Study) 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) _ 18.798(Wireless Communication Fealties) - 18.410(lot tine Ad nts) 18.740(hrsforic overlay) _ 18.810(street&Unity Improvement Standards) - 18.420(Land Partitions) 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) - 18.430(Subdivisions) 18.745(Landscaping&screening Standards) _ 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) - 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) 18.755(Mixed solid waste/Recycling Storage) k 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • • ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: �vtir`r - .wao �i .r�u c g..� a.4 0 „ O� Si-DR f-r- X-7-Y- OP 1 .,tt re i.4oC�F a-rP�r� 77/z..,4T P Imo_ • PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. -�� Public hearing before the Planning Commission. • Public hearing before the •Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 4:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1)t 81/2' x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • • The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard ��r� C'� �� . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: CITY I..TIGARD PIA , NG-DIVISI I F PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP: ME P G PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7291 E-MAIL (staff's first name)@d.tigard.or.us TITLE 18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (ODE)INTERNET ADDRESS: www.citigard.orus H:lpattylmasters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 1-Nov-2001 (Engineering section:preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NON-Residential App6catio&Planning Division Section • • • CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre-application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, 503.639.4171. Staff: Date: 1. BASIC INFORMATION Please refer to the"Land use applications basic submittal requirements"checklist for the basic submittal requirements. 2. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Arborist Report/Tree Assessment ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Geotechnical Report must address liquefaction potential and soil bearing capacity ❑ Other • 3. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 8Y2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel.it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties • ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 4 h:\patty\masters\checklist.doc (UPDATED: 26-Jun-02) • • Existing Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines(2'intervals for 0-10%slopes or 5'for slopes>10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ ♦ Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ • Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with>_6"caliper measured 4'from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise.sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ Locations of driveways on adjacent properties and across the street ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10%grades and 5'intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑. • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone transmission lines(50,000 volts or greater) ❑ ♦ Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ Supplemental information including: ♦ Proposed deed restrictions(if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands and marsh areas The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions, and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 4 h:\patty\masters\checklist.doc (UPDATED: 26-Jun-02) • • Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries p Contour lines(2'intervals for slopes 0-10%or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Location,width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25'of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4'above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements .❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ Site Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ ♦ Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ ♦ Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ ♦ Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ ♦ Loading and service areas . ❑ ♦ Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ ♦ Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations,dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25'of the site ❑ ♦ Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ ♦ Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 4 h:\patty\masters\checklist.doc (UPDATED: 26-Jun-02) • • Landscape Plan Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location,size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ Grading/Erosion Control Plan The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and meter sizes ❑ Fire hydrants (existing and proposed) ❑ Proposed fire protection system ❑ • Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location,width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ . Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ • Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 4 h:lpattyMasters\cheddist.doc (UPDATED: 26-Jun-02) £_ PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ENGINEERING SECT ION Q City of Tigard,Oregon Community Development• . Shaping A Better Community m. PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Maids): 2S101BC Tax loos):. 200 Use Type: Zone Change The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ® SW Hunziker Street to 31 feet from centerline. Hunziker is classified as a collector street and a regional access bikeway. ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet Street improvements: ® Partial street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department Section , ❑ street signs, traff.ntrol devices, streetlights and a tw ear streetlight fee. • Other: Since Hunziker is classified as a bike facility, the applicant will likely be required to contribute funds for the future bike lane striping. ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement • ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW • , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb CITY OF TICARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section • ❑ storm sewers anther underground utilities • ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: (1.) (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: ® Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW Hunziker Street. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located on the site. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to n/a (site is already served). Water Supply: The City of Tigard (Phone:(503) 639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 612-7010] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section information regarding the •quacy of circulation systems, theeed for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. • Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. If the applicant increases the impervious areas on the site, they may be required to provide an onsite detention facility. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ❑ Payment of the fee in-lieu. A water quality facility would be required if the impervious areas of the site increase over 1,000 sf. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. 1) A traffic impact report shall be submitted with the land use application to assess the traffic impact from the change in use. Intersections to analyze would include Hall/Hunziker/Scoffins and Hunziker/72nd. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section 'impact upon the City's transOtation system. The applicant shall required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. Pay TIF for change in use. PERMITS Public Facility Improvement (PFI) Permit: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows: NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. CITY of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section Y 4 • • Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy.of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS • All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: 1 ZS 6Z ENGIN NG DEPARTME iT STAFF DATE Phone: 1503)639-4171 Fax: 1503)624-0752 is\eng\brianr\templates\preap notes-eng.dot Revised: March 21,2002 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section • PRE-APPLICATION • CONFERENCE REQUEST CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION 7t4jUE • Cori%i �LL�-,�y f C� �l r a�` `w,74- tc9 '/ FOR STAFF USE ONLY Applicant: Vuet �. ftf�lc( Address: /7'l50 G)e5f IJQ((ey /114/y. Phone: qZ5-251-g5g3 Case No.: fit. OZ —00 JS 7 City: 7ukt4% (a, WA Zip: g6188 - SSt1 Receipt No.: .2-vvi —a totes Contact Person: &( Ivlucept,y Phone: 5042Y-L/6Z- Application Acce ted By: Date: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): K i ez Seca,//-y DATE OF PRE-APP.: 7/2-543 Z TIME OF PRE-APP.: /( -'- Address: 01 8 G SW Ha zlke✓ Phone: PRE-APP. HELD WITH: City: T)6 rd d 2 Zip: q 7223 Rev.7/1/2002 is\curpin\masters\revised\Pre-AppRequest.doc Property Address/Location(s): BZDS 5u) I-h4vtz'icer- REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will not be accepted without the required submittal elements) Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): 2S( D I 6C.M:cr 00z00 Zoning: L ( ❑ Pre-Application Conf. Request Form Site Size: y ZU CSC r2S 2 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: ❑ Brief Description of the Proposal and any site-specific questions/issues that PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION you would like to have staff research prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are required to be submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a ❑ Site Plan. The site plan must show the minimum of one (1) week prior to officially scheduling a proposed lots and/or building layouts pre-application conference date/time to allow staff ample time to drawn to scale. Also, show the location prepare for the meeting. of the subject property in relation to the nearest streets; and the locations of A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 driveways on the subject property and weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either across the street. Tuesday or Thursday mornings. Pre-application conferences are ❑ The Proposed Uses. one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of 9:00-11:00 AM. ❑ Topographic Information: Include Contour Lines if Possible. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN ❑ If the Pre-Application Conference is for a PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM MONOPOLE project, the applicant must 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. attach a copy of the letter and proof in the form of an affidavit of mailing, that IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE the collocation protocol was completed PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE (see Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM Community Development Code). ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE ❑ Filing Fee $200.00 GROUP. • • ♦�♦ ED MURPHY &. ASSOCIATES ♦ Land Use Planning and Development Services July 16, 2002 City of Tigard Department of Community Development 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Pre-application Conference for proposed Zone Change and SDR Tax Lot 2S101BC00200,8205 SW Hunziker Street Dear Planning and Development Services Staff: On behalf of Mr. Yun Hong of Sykart Indoor Racing Center, I would like to schedule a pre- application meeting for as soon as possible to discuss a zone change and SDR approval for a proposed indoor racetrack on the above referenced parcel. The proposal is generally described as follows: 1. Zone change from Light Industrial to Industrial Park. Needed because the proposed use is an indoor racetrack for miniature racecars or go-carts, which would be classified as "Indoor Entertainment". That use is allowed in the IP zone,but not in the LI zone. The Comprehensive Plan does not have to be amended in order to change the zoning designation. 2. Since the number of required parking spaces would increase, that would apparently trigger a Site Development Review. Therefore, we will be applying for SDR approval. 3. As the number of required parking spaces for indoor recreation far exceeds what is necessary and appropriate for the use, we will be requesting a modification or a variance to the parking standards. Description of proposal: The proposed use will be inside of an existing industrial building. The applicant is not planning on expanding the building. The existing building footprint is 31,740 square feet; however, a portion of the building is two-story, with 3077 square feet of offices on both floors, so the total gross.area of the building is 34,777 square feet. The building and site were improved in 1977 under a previous tenant, Power Rents. At that time, a handicapped accessible walkway from SW Hunziker Street to the front door was installed, along with handicapped parking spaces, and handicapped restrooms on the ground floor. The parking area is already paved and striped, and has mature landscaping. There is an existing sign 9875 SW Murdock St. Tigard, Oregon 97224 /Phone 503. 624.4625 /Cellular 503. 314.0677 /Fax 503. 968.1674 • • Hong—SyKart.Pre-application conference structure at the entrance to the site on SW Hunziker Street which the applicant will use as a sign for the new business by just changing the sign faces. The north side of the main building is a large gravel parking or storage area. A small storage building is located towards the back(north) of the parcel. The applicant does not intend to use the area behind the main building, and it is not part of his lease agreement. The building is already connected to city sewer and water. Storm drainage is generally towards SW Hunziker Street,which appears to have an open ditch and culvert storm water system. There are no sensitive lands that will be impacted by the proposed use, i.e. wetlands, steep slopes,floodplains, or wildlife habitats. Since this is an already developed parcel with an existing industrial building,it does not strictly meet all of the current city zoning and development standards. For instance, although the parking lot has some large trees for landscaping, it does not have one tree for every seven parking spaces. The applicant will make reasonable improvements to the site, but it would be impractical to bring the entire site up to current city standards. Major issues: There are three major issues that we would like to discuss in the pre-application conference, which are parking, buffering and screening and noise. Parking: The site currently has 40 marked Parking spaces, plus two handicapped parking spaces. Under the previous approval of the Power Rents plan,the city apparently required a total of 31 parking spaces, including the two handicapped spaces. The proposed use, if classified as a commercial indoor amusement area,would be required to have 4.3 parking spaces/ 1000 square feet of building area. Using just the footprint of the building(371,740 sq.ft., not counting the second floor office space), a total of 136 required parking spaces would be required at 43 spaces per 1000 sq. ft. More precisely counting the office areas in both the upper and lower floors as office space, which requires 2.7 spaces/ sq. ft. instead of 43 spaces per 1000,would still result in 138 required parking spaces. That is, 28,703 sq. ft. for the primary use at 4.3 spaces per 1000 sq. ft. plus 6074 sq. ft. as the secondary use at 2.7 spaces per 1000 sq.ft. This particular use is not listed specifically in the Zoning Code, but should be considered a unique use, unlike other indoor recreation. For instance, most of the area inside will be devoted to a racetrack. A maximum of 10 racers will be on the track at any one time. Most people race for only 30-45 minutes. The rest of the facility will be devoted to restrooms, an observation area for visitors, administrative offices, and a ticket sales and waiting area. ednuvphy&associates/hung/preapplet/7/16/02 2 • • Hong—SyKart.Pre-application conference The applicant has a very similar operation in Tukwila,Washington. For that facility, which has the same size racetrack as the one proposed in a 44,000 sq. ft. industrial building, only 28 parking spaces were required. Parking has not been a problem there. There is also a similar facility in Vancouver,Washington. Counting 2 or 3 spaces for employees, about 30 spaces is the maximum that would be used. We will confirm this through a traffic analysis,and by calling the Planning staff in Tukwila and Vancouver. Aside from the 40 marked parking spaces available, there is more already paved area on the sides of the building(west and east sides)that could be used. In addition,there are over 66 marked parking spaces available immediately adjacent to the site. The peak usage of the Sykart is in the evenings,between 8:00 to 10:00 PM,and on weekends. At those times,he owner of the adjoining property,Knez Realty Group, will allow that area to be used for overflow parking. Finally,many organized groups arrive in vans or busses, which obviously require less parking than if everyone drove their own vehicles to the site. Based on the above, the amount of parking already available at the site appears to be more than adequate,but it is a long ways from the 138 required by the Zoning Code. Buffering and Screening. The building is on a parcel currently zoned LI, and is next to a residential zone, R-4.5, and the homes that are in that zone. The zoning code would normally require new industrial land uses to use buffering and screening to protect the single family homes from any adverse effects of the industrial uses. According to Matrix 18.745.1,level "E' buffering would be required. However, the area to the west side of the building, the side facing the homes, is already paved to the property line, and there is an existing chainlink fence with slats along this property line. It would be impractical to try to create any sort of buffer there now. Also,the existing homes are located some distance away from the building(over 200'),and are at a much higher elevation. It would be difficult to add a buffer that would block the neighbor's view of the building, or provide them with any more privacy than what they already enjoy. The proposal is to amend the zoning map, and re-designate the property for I-P, which is a lighter zone. This zone is more appropriate next to the R-4.5 zone than the current LI zone. Further, the applicant does not anticipate any activity on the west side of the building that would need to be buffered. That is, the applicant does not need that area for loading or outdoor storage, or for any outdoor activities. Noise. The IP zone generally should be a "quieter"zone than the LI zone. In the proposal,all activities will take place indoors. The doors on the west side, the side facing the residences, will not be left open during operations. The fans for the building will all be on the opposite side, the ednuophy&associates/hong/preapplet17/16/02 3 • • Hong—SyKart.Pre-application conference east side, which abuts industrial uses. Further, there will be almost no truck traffic, as most of the users will arrive in automobiles or vans,not by large trucks. The noise from Hwy. 217 will most likely be louder to the neighbors than any noise they might hear from the racetrack. These are miniature go-carts,with catalytic converters and mufflers, and are not full size racecars. The walls of the building are concrete, which will stop most noise. The loudest sound produced that will be discernable outside of the building will likely be the fans, which, as noted above,will face east. Questions for staff: • What are the criteria for a zone map amendment to a zone that is already allowed by the Comprehensive Plan? • What type of evidence will the city require showing that other parking is available within 300 feet of the property? And is it within 300' of the property,or 300' of the front door of the building? The Code (18.765.030.B.2.a) says it is the "primary site". • Why does the Code have two parking ratios for office uses,2.7 and 3.9 spaces per 1000? • Is that any way other than a variance to reduce the number of off-street parking spaces to the amount of parking that currently exists at the site? • Would a variance for parking go to the Planning Commission or be a staff decision? Could the variance and SDR applications be packaged with the Zone Change, if the applicant wanted them all to be reviewed by the Planning Commission? Attachments: Attached please find the following: • A site plan prepared in 1997 for Power Rents. We will be preparing a new site plan, but it will look very much like the one attached. • An assessor's map showing the location and dimensions of the tax lot. • A topo map showing the grades and the locations of the adjoining homes. • A zoning map, showing the existing LI zoning and the surrounding IP and R-4.5 zoning. Thank-you for your time and interest. We look forward to discussing these and other issues with you at our pre-application conference. dit+ Ed Murphy Yun Hong, Sykart Mark Ferris,ASLA, LanDynamics edmiaphy&associates/hung/preapplet/7/16102 4 ` ' • 2S I 1E38 INITIAL POINT SCALE I11 = 100' • - KNOLL ACRES 1 _ Sat°37 E 669.3 •■ GEORGE RICHARDSON O.L.C. No. 38 4sa 164.50 60 N 80°25. _ 454.18 580°24'E 291.1 Sat°SS E T•• 1 • 1�- . ••.• r` ' 123.2 G3 ANA. M O.L.C. No. 39 1 NORTH LINE WILLIAM G I �,Q� 600 -+ ,n 500 400 / 301 (N.W. CORNER ( c�OO I O1 I OS \ V� Y O = / WL•6R:.N39 / 97Ac ` I 3.82 Ac. ` I v o 'I ZO9AC. D.L.C. Nc 39 l N E.�ORNER IL A N �/ l v P.W, FRO NA WILLIAMS Is ,o `, 189 93 ,�� / l36 - o p /N +- p ` 700 ° �j,W / . .. Its / - if c j\ :J I ° I 5 ;74889 v f 0 t/ 157.27 34.91 73.06 , Z '� N • 1 36)013 E V4CATED / (C.S.No.12029) " I v SA. 322/372 -- KN 29p > ch o�1 �\13 N . P o S; o2••E • • • N6>of3 l; 157.27 •t M �clo N6)413 _ y. 1 , n W o' 1 800 e-60 IQO 91 %,% o ( z>o.>) • 1 ci e 4 V'e) GREENWAY �. • 3000 1 X69 • S H 416)3 .�i ( / o` 3 0' - 1g 3100 ?'.r r�.)1 _ 500 'iv• 2 e.ti ,i - - - - - f • - - - N 1 �G - ,��.J� fi' 1� .75AC. r N. w • I56 ; /77.30�` • q3 rO 6, 2 g (� - I I W - ( 1 1•1 900 s 3300 @a.ej .-:. I s6>013• p1 r. I 1 v E ¢ N,0 4 `� 2 3200 2 v • M 1600 23@.x, �/ A • If• 1`• SEE MAP my 199 i °'-' 02 .S �5 I IN1.71AL POIN ' • 4; Ia3.ec 1 1 2S I 2AA t ; 6 60.36 I ° '�_/ '� TIGAROIA TERRAC- ° 11 / 15 - ,q iy • i 1 :� * .:6 1000 69015E 1 100@0 ,.. 966./6 O , �. 1700 S6>8 a b I,• T 23 3£ • 10 100 1 Vc 9z r /.87Ac,.... �. 1200 �' (="I / r �` / m• \ ° N ).--1- _ 0 1- 4 % N m T\1 a „ �6 u • '! i 89 56)°!3'E ,u j. pQ - _ I. ~ 's '� °I 7 W �UOO 253./6 N ' y 84 - - I- W 1 , Q /p @63 / v 1801 80.f6 ,1 \' EASEp4 NT - - _- _ - - _. - _. •- -1 I _O Z 11 /•\\ 13-•967 �N h 1,900 I M \ 11 j� _196.52 - f 70• E A S E M E'.N T I w O 1 \\\ S /pQ380 •� o r 214:90 8>• fr N 77°4Y 29..W 10 I H Z \\\ 60o33E63 / ��f-� 201 '� r1 290.00 I Io .N W \ , o,?.,Q9 d 3 4 92Ac. r, W � - - - - _ _ _ :z (] W 1 95 • 093 9 30 n d• 1 / r - - - 1 ' Z Li._ r `•1 �� \ 63 2 0° •••1, 3 i n� 1 I / e f (C.S.2 Sl tlt7 S) 1 N ` 48 ,.176 \` °r v� . / l H• 1 - \ . s �� 2..//Ac, W ■., I\Z I N6 0 . 84.c . - . • //NY ,11 1 I a cc W 39. • N ` ^pj • ' , �'0 I W C • ll Y 1 2202 CQ /� �04 i nvl+�v� '� 1 ° Q S.W• c + 1 p 98 Ac. TO NO 3 �9 6 ~' @0 64 nv/'°a I N • 1 h ; SCpFFIN I PuB�,� 4 � � ly 1 CC Cl- STREET "\ /0,3 0• 9e6 I I ° N I 11 t. I cm�6 •2a.w 2200 iy)9 �2g!760.:s39.2e I I ! • N . r w s ,.�Ac. , N��K :-. , 1. 16+461SP.C. 2300 /� � TO . • a 1 I ^, m .2/Ac. vi Pue i i c id )IN t., O N i�X ,� urn a S60o ,„ 2201 . r /09 9! .�� f �!� c ° l03, 39E _ ti /.05Ac. 3i9 @! ° CPc n' I•'-Ar A n 6q 23 n O 2100 ' J. c, 39 f I 7 ,0 p SUi I : SEE MAP 2401 !?0 32 Ac. �'! 71: 9s6 ••. W C 9' �1 E 2:9; .3 02 I. 2S I 2AD 3.51 Ac. .N 1e• C.S. 3886 ° s,°!;�� ��., 6q a � 6' Sy E o� $:0 1 j"7 II Ss�� o \ n, r•3c AC. i Tf. \ n4 (ISO., 120 0 . / u • 1 ).2p 93 ° 'p •..i•'r�1G: BC f„ 1 :a I • d z _ 1: • f / 2f3 p j v %S7Ac. 63c'.Sn0g3�9,„ „.„..„.:,.......:.......:,-.._• .......,:.[;...,,,,..,,' ' \-,,,,:\ ..„..--..-,..."...'” • ,„ ... . ,.:p• , ...., • 1 'fr'e' ."'-'• .. ......... . - -.-.•".". • 7........-.7.2.-.7:-...-.... ---- --.-•••••_....:.:•,-,.., 0'z:ft. *,•#•......5.-..- o„..,00at,i 50..6 Na..., P.6 ' , ''' '.. ' X • \X\„„,,, - tex-*** PP'''PPPP-17:1:...........1:::::::=7.-z......i.t..17:: -,.... ......-.. - ottt, .."...,\;',...,„,..:„\\*.,15.,-5,,a,T-a...............,tot,„,, •‘„to..:711"/ -‘"7„......,....a it„,'„7/ ..,..,..o..... . • - ay..' -,--..."5.--,...4.... . to — --/----......- a-co,— ...„.___.,..1 -C-8.........."!,55:...,;;- -1.'''''....° ..)''s:\....:::‘‘\:::-I'''.7-•7„ - /../...i::„.„1:0;:',1'/'-7"::, ....... r.,---- ---- .-- -,,, \\ •,.. \\`‘, 5 „ ..t......5-" 5...,„___ I 4 11 1 .1 rJ ; ..,r.:1 i',..'...!. ; 1 1''.1 '. ki. \';. .'.'. ..% ...\(\1'..4•'.„'4'"•••'-•••-••— i p c.. 1pi 1,...I,•1 i„I 14 i)1 Ij;.l 1 f.i 4>)I i l'•'! itjiq 1 t i :i I i i f I'i I 'i 1 I 1/• 7:,51 ' '1''''''''''''-'-'''-.-•:"`,•)-- ,,. k,\ *i .• .• t1.x 5 .0 i 1 1•/lii*i 1i..i 1 1r i f,1 /f 1 1 f/1• 1 i 1 i 1 I f I ) i / i 1 II ! I I •*'''' /*”.• / A• ' • • 1/I f v5-02..• 1 ' 1 f iii : t ; . ....„, , •• i f i i 1 i • i '/r i :' 4 : ,r I i I 1 1 I I I i I ri i /II i fi It 1 Ak, i i 1 a 1 i . / ..? 1 I •I i i kl,. i \\,........j iti I I i 1 f r =X .• I I i 1 • 1 s 5 if • .,. i I I Il 2. '''''cYity 1 lit \ \ i, fle ili .-.. t I I '7 i ilf/ st II i . ' --- ki /- • --. t----4,,,-....k. . -, Li/ t '... .4:I I • *-..--.. Ill"'P't:€1/iia-*.----"----e. .,,_f I. *K. .) i i 1 i . -.5 ,.„ / T .X. Pit 1 i ,....../ ••:4; 1 !,.'- 7\ , • i I/ ,,, P i i I I . : i 1 • i -,„ I/ ! i V.5-4.•,' :f il ■.... ''''' '-•.'..: ••••7•.-7,....„.‘- \... - k it'7,1" ] I I rel'-",.--.... ./' . • . ''''''.4.,.„'"‘ •4*. , ••7 I ...'• i ... , #5.0 5 IN ... / # i i , • , .. • .. 4.-: I..., ...__......7,---rz--- /• ''''„,.if, •-fff•f•f. ***, ,if Iff I'•1 i .•'.•••'•*.-• ,,,,,/ / ,. 4`,.-.,..,... M .• • 1.\,.. 1 .i • I: 1. i i i 4 1, \... , •*),.. .;.: 1 .‘...,-.. '1 ..• ''...'......f. 'ft. ' '..:h.. • , I:ii I fff•-• f • if .. I ... f‹,... I ••••1 ''''''.'"•'!"..".....„„, i . ' • 1,../ .•;. ir. . . - .• .--.,•.„. ""*""°- , . 1 .,,,•••,' '••I't i • .•.: t,.I ...:..7.,••0..6 it.:;!,,,/ /"Q e--• -• (,..- i. / ,../ • .4. ../..„ •::. \,••".::.: e' ! f. ., .. • ........i ._•• ../. * ' '.,,,, ''.,.. ; •••'-'.> • z ■,...',.. 7' . -....°'• i • • " \..\ 11 II 1 Al 4IP...../ .... / ••• i . ... ** / '•••''',..„....% ,...*,.. , / :(fa. .`. • -" -, ...1-.„ „....-„t .‘ta .ipr:I 1 ,..- ,.. . ,..,........ ..,, -... - ...'''''''''•-•‘'.:"*./\; ,'; • ' • •i '' „•*°.°,,*.,:-'•';'‘''..,„:"‘",-..,"ts'' ' .1,.......... -- „„ .., .„...... ..,. `,.. • '1 ....' :•7 . .4. .'. "4"-#.4.:.. -.\---...-•-••••.et,#•••„ ' -.'"..7.-.- •••••••,.., , -••,..„. — •„.., - . ___... '''''..........„,„.„,....... --;••••,:r':',.:., '-..*•••••:.::. ...-.". , ..., ..,, -.....-**•-•-•'.' 1/. .." ' ...i......./ '•' ••••., / / /.. •• .• ...s... .... TA ..• ./. -..A. . ..... 12• 12• g•_p• 5'-0• 6'-D• - . • 0 f6. I I _ Z !N rn. •.:..: L . 1 O EL a6' L® - •• .q•7%7:•ifk / • w z ∎':ce i . s : ,} .' / • I ELEVATION , O DATUM t ,.t • o ' � / A .,.. .-:::!..4.■... j .f ALO OPEGOB • 5 t ' S 2155 -i• ' ' f ® ` O -. -• �'OF OS • ;. ..- -P .. i DesnNG BUILDING EX,ST,KC BUrtLWG _�_ / .C7 KEYNES: ER20-68 `r .7 t TOP RAW AT SIDEWALK TEE CONDITION. 8.0.SICN( • N 1 �2 pERC�ABLF WARNING SURFACE 70 BE SCORED I (S'IN '! - dAY PATTERN AT 2'011(ENTER YAXIYUY. OR20-60 O ci 1•WIDE PAINT STRIPES TYPCAL I / O SIGNAGFE DENOTING RESTRICTED P•RxPIG PER OR20-EB ANO M10-6D. CC O WT Rt4 1ONAI SYMBOL OF ACCCSSABRJTY REOIPAFD Al EACH SPACE. •. I �+ p S• O FIRST.,BEOUIRED SPACE TO BE VAN ACCESSIBLE. '" • I O7 PAVING SLOPE NOT.TO EXCEED 1:50 IN ANY DIRECTION AT EXIST LANDSCAPING •• �` Q :1 HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES!LOADING AREA .� EXIST.LANDSCAPING =a E pn .!.• Q ,.T EASING BUILDING \ID •i,, •® ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE OP A SmFwALK a< ±'i W yf• • \. -prk 3/18•.1-0� ,�f. Q v '-"i ...• ii - __—,— -- -r \ .� ' \ Y♦ • NEW STRIPED WAIL(AREA ....,,,,.........N.: ' i 'N: a1 �� EgST.LANDSCAPING trJ. n •-'r•• EXIST.ASPHALT _ i 3 I SEE YETK STAKT . PAYING ._ Q U In b .• • EDGE OF EXIST.PAVING AI I Y• ///���///PROVIDE NEW VOIEEL STOPS EXISTING LANDSCAPNG '',1. SS N R .'...�qr �Wlilll �I� GAPED L<Ifly ". 1 • 1• I I-- 1 EgST.SIDEWALK j�9�+?; 1IW •:i• u OE YIANDICA('PEDI PARKING ! pp •• • •tT/ I , I I I EXIST.LANDSCAPING it .'._,,. •TT I RESTRIPE EXIST.PARKING rw '�' - .,. I STIR• w SS WAY -_ / - .:. ���✓✓✓/•. / EXIST.PARKING AND ENTRY DRIVES • o I l _ • " SITE PLAN § I _ Q `;, EXsi.sa WALK � • "'I .. -• t')/1«o PROVIDE NEW SIDE1T i '--W ig _I..._-... C� CURB ARDS.(T9 AT 5) - ,I EXIST.LANDSCAPING W r Q. 30 60` 90 m ____ Z . —. A. EXIST.SIDEWALK ti 0 •` i - 1 NOTE: 16 • .. �.', PROPERTY LINE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES AS WELL AS SITE AREA -' (� _ ' • CALCULATIONS ARE PROVIDED FOR ZONING AND PERYIT RENEW ONLY. 3 O ir REAL PROPERTY LEGAL DESC:RIPTIOfjS AND AREA CALCULATIONS ARE \�leg, y:..( . •TO BE PROVIDED BY A REOSTERED PROFESSIONAL'SURVEYOR. W - .e ;y• • 5 \ EXIST.ASPHALT / r / r 1--. PAVING / / •a - / Ex4TING BuXDING �!: 1 (+Ew SIOE WALK � � � . C / I t0 uwTCN Ew:T r z �: ��Z : PROJECT SUMMARY: AREA 31739.36 SOFT _ tn� J / • • 3 ACRES LLAI• Q. .�-.�"I JURISDICTION: CITY OF DGARD _.- - ty• e �_0▪ . \ EX6T.ASPHALT EXIST.GATE EXISTING lANOSC G n :_`• LAND USE ZONE: PAVING-� _- '' - - - ` f W N ALLOWABLE AREA: EXISTING WAREHOPUSE/OFFICE BUILDING `_ _ Z_ { BUILDING CODE - UBC 1994 - - _ • EXIST.FENCE - 'I BUILDING OCCUPANCY- B LAND AREA / BUILDING AREA SUMMARY: - _ _ - / irjobseas- OFYIGARD /''G/''� oa f/-� -` `"� f • / _._.»._._..._._.._._.....__... LL.DND�" V/. �j l I Id CONSTRUC110N TYPE 5-N -_-- - "� .];SITE AREA: EXISTING NO CHANGE _ OrtdlLio080Y ,PARKING: 31+ SPACES LANDSCAPE AREA: EXISTING NO CHANGE . OAR -Q INIIY tl10 work 88 tlBS ,-..... '_. -• I PAVEMENT AREA. O(ISTING NO CHANGE EQMR Np• f�JO G/7- --T2.kXiE 1997 ,.^. ...6UILDING AREA 31.740 50.FT.EXISTING NO CHANGE - �.FoPOw. �' '.YAW FLOOR OFFICE: 3.037 SOFT. - 1 � : 1.SG . ._` UPPER FLOOR OFFICE: 3.037 SO. FT. _ "!•44..................... Date: t ��. «�, .-..:.'•7 YAN MAN' ,"tit • SNQ7 MO .'• G 1: - =: . INFORMATION ON THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT • - - • APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL A - PLOT DATES: • - OF WILDING PERYIT HAS BEEN ISSUED.C:\ACAO\`.OL\HUNZ\HNZG-1 7/1B/97 6:58.21 MAN ":.''ya rwvised permit :set'7/18/97;.'..-:;'. we 1 e # . 444 11 ' of i pfts.w.....,..w4.0,.w...,.......0. * w..,. .....0..4w"..,, .-..-444 4:4 44 4t.4.V44■44:144404t i. 1 ' , . i.. 1 . .0.,.. ...f4t" . *-4•0$4,,...."0.4,a-,,0,,o,t4au.,4,04.kits 4'444=t 1 * 4.'...4 .'tN... , 1 ...'"s".. il 4 .,..„„ 00 'Iva. C.. • e.,.. -,. i ...a .c.."C ...."' .14 f 1 C44.N.4. 4 4. 't. ••"=` 0 . . A A ••••• . ...• ,_ ) k'' .0%, • x •t, , 0 . 14 4 4' , ....,„ 4......, \ ...t. . , : 1 ...., • $ i : ',, • \ it. 1 1 kt.'t ss. , t...: 4..\ ,... ,. ■ 4.- ta°4 4( 41 1 P" :444 ftr f .4.. ,.. 11 , ( ; .44444 / .., .„4 ....4 q4 1 1 7 4 ' 04444■446■0 S. .: ■ .0/ •• *SC 0 - 1 ; ' ...... ■ tt Itt \ • .. . • • . '.. ' , k ' • ' • $ ' ‘.... ;1. it 1 N 4 .i.„.„.. ...i < ' 1 4..,.. ." .4. ...1% . , < , Nk , , . r I -4,4,, ii• , '...1 . f.., -.). -.