Loading...
CPA1995-00001 • it • ` ' AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON - ) • County of Washington ) City of Tigard ) I, C.a)14en cane_ h�ct 4-t -j , hereby certify: Please Print That I am a Cc. C-Q—r�5\_._ for the City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served notice of the Tigard City Council 't'� O f\ c9-Q-n — PP q5=Ut)DI120agsaDoa. (4n ) of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each of the following named persons on the i s--4 day of JA-An/u2 19 Cif, , by mailing to each of them at the address shown on the attached list (Marked Exhibit B), said notice is hereto attached, and deposited in the United States Mail on the �S day of , 19 43 , postage prepaid. c A ok i J 60�� . Prepared Notice i Subscribed and sworn to before me this — day of ,%-c.-04_ , 19 c 5 . ".?. OFFICIAL SEAL 1---- ° = M JO ANN HAYES I'd t :, NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON asa-v-* 6194ib- �:® COMMISSION rio.oa2,ae Nota ublic of Oregon . MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 05,,sss My Commission Expires: re‘a4,6 S a lgT5 h:\login\cathy\afofmaii • • CITY OF TIGARD • Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - BY CITY COUNCIL Concerning Case Number(s): CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 APPLICANT: Andrews Management OWNER: Arthur & Margaret Verharen 4000 SW Kruse Way Place 12435 SW 60th Building 1, Suite 270 Portland, OR 97219 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 OWNER: Paul & Anna Herberholz OWNER: McGuire, Robert/William/James/Thomas 8400 SW Pfaffle Street Powell, Sarah Tigard, OR 97223 8470 SW Pfaffle Street Tigard, OR 97223 OWNER: Oregon Department of Transportation Region 1/Property Management Office 5320 SW Macadam Portland, OR 97201 Request: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 95-0001/ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 95-0002 A request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Map from C-P (Commercial Professional) and Low-Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential, and to change the zoning from C-P and R-4.5 to R-25. ZONE: Currently, two parcels (3.44 acres) are C-P and two parcels (2.07 acres) are R-4.5. The C-P zone allows groups of businesses and offices in centers to provide opportunities for employment and for business and professional services. The R-4.5 district allows single- family residential units, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, family day care, and home occupations among other uses. LOCATION: South of SW Pfaffle Street at SW 83rd Avenue (WCTM 1S1 36CC, tax lots 200, 300, 400 and 2,200). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Comprehensive Plan Policies 2, 6, 8 and 12; Community Development Code Chapters 18.22, 18.32 and 18.56 and the change or mistake quasi-judicial plan map amendment criteria of the comprehensive plan (policy 1.1.2) and community development code (18.22.040). Action: ❑ Approval as requested D Approval with conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: ® The applicant and owner(s) ® Owners of record within the required distance ® The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator ® Affected governmental agencies : ::: r Final>Decision.:::.THE DECISION:;WAS.SLGNED ON EFFECTIVE:. ::_Go t�. . . :.;,,,. :..::;;:,.:.::.. : -..::.:: :..:. ::..; ::--:::.. :-;:>:;:: :.<: :»: ;::::::: :<:::::::: ir ,ON (3 ,...1995. . .::.. :. ; .. ;: . ;:<>:::..:::.:: ::.>:::<;.:;:.:::;>:> ::: he adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. A review of this decision may be obtained by filing a notice of intent with the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) according to their procedures. QUESTIONS: If you have any questions, please call the Tigard City Recorder at (503) 639-4171. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 95- IC) AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A TIGARD . . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE REQUESTED BY ANDREWS MANAGEMENT (CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002) . WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a comprehensive plan map amendment and zone change from Low Density Residential/R4 .5 to Medium-High Density Residential/R-25 on two parcels (1S1 36CC, lots 300 and 400) and from C-P (Commercial Professional) /C-P to Medium-High Density Residential/R- 25 on two parcels (1S1 36CC, lots 200 and 2200) ; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing. for the proposed amendment and zone change at its meeting of April 17, 1995, and recommends approval of CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 . THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The proposed amendment is consistent with all relevant criteria based upon the facts, findings and conclusions noted in the attached final order (Exhibit A) ; SECTION 2 : The City Council concurs with the Planning Commission and staff recommendations and approves the request to designate the parcels illustrated on the attached map (Exhibit B) . SECTION 3 : This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By LlflarVirY' OU5 vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this 30 day of -11101 , 1995. Catherine Wheatley, Ci Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this with day of A , 1995. Jai - -icoli, Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorn_ Date ORDINANCE No. 95- 10 Page 1 110 410 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TIGARD CITY COUNCIL FINAL ORDER A FINAL ORDER INCLUDING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS WITH REGARD TO AN APPLICATION FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE REQUESTED BY ANDREWS MANAGEMENT. The Tigard City Council reviewed the application below at a public hearing on May 30, 1995. The City Council approves the request. The Council has based its decision on the facts, findings and conclusions noted below. A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 95-0001 Zone Change ZON 95-0002 REQUEST: Amend the Comprehensive Plan map from C-P (Commercial Professional) and Low Density , Residential to Medium-High Density Residential and change the zoning from C-P and R-4. 5 to R-25. APPLICANT: Andrews Management 4000 SW Kruse Way Place Building 1, Suite 270 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 OWNERS: Arthur & Margaret Verharen Paul & Anna Herberholz 12435 SW 60th 8400 SW Pfaffle Street Portland, OR 97219 Tigard, OR 97223 McGuire, Robert/William/ ODOT James and Thomas Region 1/Property Mgmt Dowell, Sarah 5320 SW Macadam 8470 SW Pfaffle Street Portland, OR 97201 Tigard, OR 97223 REPRESENTATIVE: Spencer Vail, Planning Consultant 4505 NE 24th Avenue Portland, OR 97211 LOCATION: South of SW Pfaffle Street at SW 83rd Avenue (WCTM 1S1 36CC, lots 200, 300, 400 and 2200) 2 . Vicinity The four affected parcels, containing 5.51 acres, are located 1 • • along SW Pfaffle Street, north of Pacific Highway and east of SW Hall Boulevard (see map, Exhibit B) . The properties to the • . north across SW Pfaffle Street are designated as Low and Medium Density Residential with a zoning of R-4.5, R-7 and R- 12; to the east are properties zoned C-P and include the General Motors Training Center and some vacant parcels; to the south is Highway 217; and to the west are three small parcels zoned C-P which include a cellular telephone monopole and a single family house. 3 . Background Information Parcels A and B were annexed to the city and zoned R-4. 5 in 1987 as part of the south Metzger annexation. Parcel C was annexed to the city in 1969 by the present owners. Parcel D, owned by ODOT, is within the original area of incorporation of the city. Parcels C and D are zoned C-P. No development applications have been reviewed for any of the four parcels. The Planning Commission held a hearing on this proposal on April 17, 1995, and unanimously recommends approval. 4 . Site Information and Proposal Description The triangular site of 5. 51 acres is comprised of four parcels. Parcels A and B front on SW Pfaffle Street and have single family houses on them. Parcel C fronts on SW Pfaffle Street and is vacant. Parcel D is vacant and has no roadway access. All of the parcels are relatively flat but are situated approximately 20 feet above Highway 217 along their southern boundary. The applicant requests a comprehensive plan map amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential and from C-P (Commercial Professional) to Medium-High Density Residential; and a zone change from R-4. 5 to R-25 and from C-P to R-25 on the four properties as follows (see map) : • Low Density Residential/R-4 . 5 to Medium-High Density Residential/R-25: - Parcel A: WCTM 1S1 36CC, lot 400 (0. 82 acres) - Parcel B: WCTM 1S1 36CC, lot 300 (1. 25 acres) • C-P (Commercial Professional) /C-P to Medium-High Density Residential/R-25: - Parcel C: WCTM 1S1 36CC, lot 200 (2 . 55 acres) - Parcel D: WCTM 1S1 36CC, lot 2200 (0.89 acres) A written document, transportation analysis and preliminary site plan have been submitted by the applicant. The written document and analysis are included as part of this staff report. The site plan was submitted as an example of what 2 • • • could be done on the site. Because the proposed action is a land use change and not a development application, the site plan is not part of this report, though it will be entered into the record as being part of the application. 5. Agency Comments The Engineering and Building divisions, Police Department and the Unified Sewerage Agency have reviewed the proposal and have no objections. No other comments were received at the time of this report. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Comprehensive Plan policies 2 . 1. 1, 6. 1. 1, 8. 1. 1, 8.2. 2, and 12 . 1.3 ; Community Development Code chapters 18.22, 18. 32 and 18.56; and Oregon Administrative Rule 660-12-060. 1. Policy 2 . 1. 1 states that the city shall maintain an ongoing citizen involvement program and shall assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process. The policy is satisfied because the surrounding property owners were given notice of public hearings related to the proposal and given the opportunity to comment on the proposal. The notices of hearings were also posted at Tigard City Hall and advertised in a local newpaper. In addition, the applicant provided notice of and conducted a meeting on January 13 , 1995, for interested property owners within a 250-foot radius of the affected properties. 2 . Policy 6. 1. 1 states that the city shall provide an opportunity for a diversity of housing densities and residential types at various prices and rent levels. The designation of the affected properties to Medium-High Density Residential and R- 25 will allow for the potential development of 137 units of housing. This change would contribute to a diversity of housing opportunities for the city. If approved, the proposal would also increase the housing opportunity index from 10. 38 to 10. 44 units per acre, thus helping to implement the Metropolitan Housing Rule by increasing the residential density in the city. 3 . Policy 8. 1. 1 states that the city shall plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. The transportation impact analysis conducted by Kittelson and Associates, Inc. concludes that all the intersections studied along SW Pfaffle Street will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service during all time periods with full build out under the proposed zoning. Although forced-flow conditions created by traffic backed up from the SW 3 • • • Dartmouth/Highway 99W intersection currently occur during the peak hour periods at the SW 78th Avenue/SW Pfaffle Street intersection, the proposed zoning change would have minimal impacts on this already-existing condition. The study found that the proposed zoning would result in 480 fewer trips on the transportation system than if the site was fully developed under the current zoning. 4 . Policy 8 .2 .2, states, in part, that the city shall encourage the expansion and use of public transit by locating land intensive uses in close proximity to transitways. Tri-met offers bus service on Highway 99W and SW Hall Boulevard. The policy is satisfied, therefore, because the proposed redesignation would locate an intensive residential use within one quarter mile of a transit corridor. 5. Policy 12 . 1. 3 lists the locational criteria for designating land as medium-high and high density residential on the plan map. The locational criteria can be construed in a flexible manner in the interest of accommodating proposals which are found to be in the public interest and capable of integration into the community. The burden of proving conformance with the criteria varies with the degree of change and impact on the community. The applicable locational criteria with findings are as follows: a. Areas which are not committed to low density development. Although Parcels A and B are currently zoned R-4.5 and have single family houses on them, the area is not committed to low density development. The parcels were annexed to the city as part of the south Metzger area in 1987 . They were the only annexed parcels located south of SW Pfaffle Street and were assigned an R-4 . 5 zoning along with all the properties north of the street. This was done despite the fact that the two-parcel area had C-P zoning on each side and Highway 217 along the southern border. Parcels C and D have always been zoned for commercial uses. b. Areas which can be buffered from low density residential areas in order to maximize the privacy of established low density residential areas. The proposed area can be adequately buffered from the low density residential area on the north side of SW Pfaffle Street through the density transition, buffering and screening requirements of the Community Development Code. These requirements would be met during subdivision review when an application is submitted to the city. c. Areas which have direct access from a major collector or arterial street. The proposed area is not located on a major collector or arterial street. SW Pfaffle Street is 4 • • classified as a minor collector by the city. The property is located, however, within 250 feet of SW Hall • • Boulevard, which is an arterial street. The Kittelson analysis indicates that the amount of traffic that would be generated by the proposed plan amendment and zone change area, even if developed to the maximum allowable density, would be less than under the current zoning designations. Less traffic will mean less impact to the existing residential development north of SW Pfaffle Street. In addition, the proposed change to residential land use on the four parcels would be more in keeping with the residential character along this portion of SW Pfaffle Street than would commercial office land use. For these reasons, strict adherence to this criterion is not warranted in this case. d. Areas which are not subject to development limitations. There are no known development limitations on the proposed site. Detailed review of the site characteristics would be undertaken at the time of development application. e. Areas where the existing facilities have the capacity for additional development. The existing facilities and services have adequate capacity to accommodate additional development. The sanitary sewer, storm and water lines located along SW Pfaffle Street are capable of handling development allowed under the proposed changes. According to the traffic report, SW Pfaffle Street will operate at acceptable levels of service. Existing police and fire services are available and adequate for the site area. f. Areas within one-quarter mile of public transit. Public transit is available on Pacific Highway and SW Hall Boulevard, which are within one-quarter mile of the site. g. Areas within one-quarter mile from neighborhood and general commercial shopping centers or business and office centers. Within one-quarter mile of the site is the Tigard Plaza on SW Hall and the Pacific Highway corridor with access to shopping and business/office centers. h. Areas adjacent to either private or public permanent open space. There is no private or public permanent open space areas adjacent to the site. Despite this fact, the proposed plan amendment and zone change is in the public interest and is capable of harmonious integration into the community. The site would provide the capability of developing higher density, diverse housing along a 5 transportation corridor within an established urban area. Furthermore, the flexibility of this criterion is noted where other R-25 zoned areas exist in the city without adjacent open space. For these reasons, strict adherence to this criterion is not warranted in this case. 6. Section 18. 32 of the Community Development Code sets forth the procedural requirements for review of quasi-judicial plan amendments. The application has been processed in accordance with code sections 18.32 .020, 18. 32 . 050 and 18. 32 . 060; hearings have been conducted by the planning commission and city council according to 18. 32 . 090 (D) and (E) ; and the requirements for notification of the hearing have been met according to 18. 32 . 130 and 18.32 . 140. 7 . Section 18. 22 of the Community Development Code sets forth standards and procedures for quasi-judicial amendments to the plan and zoning district map as follows: A. A recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application for a quasi-judicial amendment shall be based on all of the following standards: 1. The applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designation and; the change will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the community. The applicable plan policies related to the proposal are reviewed above under section B (Findings and Conclusions) . 2 . The statewide planning goals adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197 , until acknowledgement of the comprehensive plan and ordinances. The Tigard Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged, therefore specific review of each statewide planning goal is not applicable. Notice of filing this proposed amendment has been provided to the Department of Land Conservation and Development for comment at least 45 days prior to the final decision date. 3 . The applicable standards of any provision of this code or other applicable implementing ordinance. Code section • 18 .56 (Multiple-Family Residential) contains the standards for the R-25 zone. The proposed site could meet the standards listed under "dimensional requirements" and "additional requirements" for a development. Specific future site development improvements will be reviewed through the subdivision and/or site development review procedures to ensure consistency with this section's standards. 6 • • 4 . Evidence of chancre in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to the property which is the subject of the development application. This criterion is met because there is evidence that a mistake was made in the designations of the comprehensive plan and zoning maps regarding the affected properties. Parcels A and B were annexed to the city in 1987 as part of the south Metzger area annexation. They were designated as Low Density Residential and zoned R-4 . 5 along with the properties north of SW Pfaffle Street and east of SW 83rd Avenue to comply with the Urban Planning Area Agreement (UPAA) with the county. At the time of annexation, the parcels were zoned Washington County R-5 . However, it could be argued that a mistake was made at the time of designation since they were the only annexed parcels located south of SW Pfaffle Street, and the only ones zoned for residential land use. Furthermore, at the time of annexation the parcels were, and still are, bordered on the north by medium density residential, on the east and west by C-P zoned property and on 'the south by Highway 217. This area is not, therefore, committed to low density residential. The UPAA did allow for an exception to the zoning requirement if the city and county agreed at the time of annexation that the county designation was outdated. Given their location within a commercial and higher density area, the zoning on the two parcels was outdated at the time of annexation. Parcels C and D are zoned C-P. Parcel C was annexed to the city in 1969 and has remained vacant. Parcel D, currently owned by ODOT, has been part of the city since its incorporation and has remained vacant as well. Access to Parcel C is via SW Pfaffle Street only. This parcel has very limited visibility for a commercial land use due to its location and elevation above Highway 217 . Parcel D has no direct access to a street. It is a triangular-shaped parcel that is land-locked by Parcel C to the north, the GM Training Center to the east and the Highway 217 north bound on-ramp to the south. The fact that no commercial development has been proposed on these parcels since the C-P zone was established may very well reflect their location and orientation. Due to the preceding evidence, the planning staff concurs with the applicant and concludes that mistakes and/or inconsistencies were made in the comprehensive plan and zoning maps regarding the affected four parcels. 8 . Chapter 12, Section 060 of the Transportation Planning Rule requires that amendments to comprehensive plans which significantly affect a transportation facility shall assure 7 • • that allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity and level of service of the facility. An amendment significantly affects a facility if it changes the functional classification of an existing or planned facility, changes standards implementing a classification system, allows land uses which would result in levels of service which are inconsistent with the classification, or reduces the level of service of the facility below the minimum acceptable level. This criterion is met for the following reasons. The amendment and zone change would not change the functional classification of SW Pfaffle Street or SW Hall Boulevard; the proposed residential land use is not inconsistent with the functional classification of the street system in the area; and the traffic level of service generated by the proposal would not reduce the street system below the minimum level. The traffic consultant report found that the SW Hall/SW Pfaffle intersection will operate at an acceptable level of service during both the weekday AM and PM peak hours, and that potential development under the proposed change would result in 480 fewer trips than development under the current zoning. C. DECISION The City Council approves the requested comprehensive plan amendment and zone change to designate the following properties as Medium-High Density Residential on the comprehensive plan map and R-25 on the zoning map: WCTM 1S1 36CC, lots 200, 300, 400 and 2200 The Council finds that the change will promote the general welfare of the city and will not be significantly detrimental and injurious to surrounding land uses. • 8 • - • EXHIBIT S • ■rigiammol∎■•■ m IMMI t_i_LL.L_LJ I I I I I Irma II is I i I f P- 1 E THOR a _1 Lj.ipiiIIIjj .■■ MIEN ani LI..iimift. : ■Mni ii 4;_l. 41 X MN "1141 onio" ow.■ /■■ ■■am. ,■ - a 1-- • all u., Impil_all ti.i ,,..imia. 0 ri-ajor..- Ellilh'Ir .. __Ir "1 lin IR matea:K:t:it.- / . i um 106.. 16, -., OOP DC . 2 r i ,. • III Po 0.7,■ $ /45 ..,.. '�- ■ ■ u_ if Ii � � 0 Cril 00" , P 1 pit -8 ii 0 III \-3� = >"0 - _ _ f— ill *SI 0 ..1k . *lit, 4., ski I, VICINITY EXHIBIT MAP I' ':'"':iCHANGE FROM VON MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND //t\ ZONE CHANGE FROM R-4.5 TO R-25 Mr e 4 CHANGE FROM C PEHENSIVE PLAN NO-TH MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND Scale 1'.400' A ZONE CHANGE FROM C-P TO R-25 FEET A REFER TO STAFF REPORT 0 400 800 mmin TIGARD CITY LIMITS MAGI SOATnOCOVVIELSOWG YCPA.DWG 3/14/44 (Page 1 or 1) • • • • CPA 95-0001/ZCN 95-0002 • ALA MANAGEMENT SPENCER VAIL PAUL BROSSIA MARC BUTOPAC 4505 NE 24TH AVENUE 11260 SW HALL BOULEVARD KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES PORTLAND OR 97211 TIGARD OR 97223 610 SW ALDER, SUITE 700 PORTLAND OR 97205 PHIL MCHUGH ARTHUR 7 MARGARET VERHAREI 5719 SW SEYMOUR STREET 12435 SW 60TH PORTLAND OR 97221 PORTLAND, OR 97219 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT PAUL & ANNA HERBERHOLZ MCGUIRE, ROBERT/WILLIAM/ 4000 SW KRUSE WAY PLACE 8400 SW PFAFFLE ST JAMES/THOMAS/POWELL , SARA1 BUILDING 1 , SUITE 270 TIGARD,OR 97223 8470 SW PFAFFLE ST LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 TIGARD, OR 97223 OREGON DEPT. OF TRANSPORT. JACK POLANS REGION 1/PROPERTY MGT OFF. 16000 SW QUEEN VICTORIA PLACE 5320 SW MACADAM KING CITY OR 97224 PORTLAND, OR 97201 - - FAX TRANSMITTAL - PL410 UNDER CITY OF TIGARD LOG* LEGAL NOTICE SECTION OF TIGARD TIMES DATE:5/12/95 TO: Sue Curran, Legals (fax) 620-3433 FROM: Jerree Gaynor, City of Tigard (Ph.) 639-4171 The following will be considered by the Tigard City Council on Tuesday, Mav 30, 1995, at 7:30 PM at the Tigard Civic Center- Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. Both public oral and written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal Code, and rules and procedures of the City Council. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter precludes an appeal, and failure to specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 639-4171. . PUBLIC HEARINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA)95-0001/ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 95-0002 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT ■ A request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Map from C-P (Commercial Professional) and Low-Density Residential to Medium- High Density Residential, and to change the zoning from C-P and R-4.5 to R-25. LOCATION: South of SW Pfaffle Street at SW 83rd Avenue (WCTM 1S1 36CC, tax lots 200, 300, 400 and 2200). APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA: Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.2, 2, 6, 8 and 12; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.22, 18.32 and 18.56. ZONE: Currently, two parcels (3.44 acres) are C-P and two parcels (2.07 acres) are R-4.5. The C-P zone allows groups of businesses and offices in centers to provide opportunities for employment and for business and professional services. The R-4.5 district allows single-family residential units, public support facilities,�e'sidential treatment homes, farming, family day care, and home occupations among „a...AMOK other uses. - 1 1.4 • mi; e � 1 . n n4(Ut1�40s _�-- W RR , ..,:ir --. , 11. IIM MUM. \i‘ I= ii: - 1W Mr as 0 ME Z ■ n■ .. N■. z �U--- 'j% i Q 1Iu I 0 i, - ,�-,...„ 0, ,,_ - c3,. • i 1 0-,,A0,4% e7i_ Vlq . • o , _ ‘ -.., -, ! ,*.s. ,-.1 -4-I ,- 111 ,` -T ,0 ,&. 1011.......,c.....fE 1 I TT PUBLISH DATE: 5/18/95 VICINITY EXHIBIT MAP ""°`s'°' ` .rp M ..0401121 RIw w o w rw II:a� COMM OICOODMAI.me EP!oara mar O+TO 0411 cEET A wee 10 erw TvoM 0 ao0 . 800 eta,^°""°°..:rm CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT May 30,1995 • ft -110 • Council Agenda Item TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 30, 1995 • • Meeting was called to order at 6:37 p.m. by Mayor Nicoli. - 1. ROLL CALL Council Present: Mayor Jim Nicoli; Councilors Wendi Conover Hawley,,Paul Hunt, Bob Rohlf, and Ken Scheckla. Staff Present: Bill Monahan, City Administrator; John Acker, Property Manager;Will D'Andrea,.Assistant Planner; Pam Beery, Legal Counsel; Senior Planner Bewersdorff; Jim Hendry; Community Development Director; Carol Landsman, Senior Planner; Liz Newton,/Community Involvement Coordinator; Ray Valone, Associate Planner; Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder; and Randy Wooley, City Engineer. STUDY SESSION • Planning Commissioners present: Carolyn DeFrang, James Griffith, and Ron Holland. • Tigard Triangle Traffic Study Senior Planner Landsman introduced this topic. Council met with consultants who recently completed the Traffic Study for the Tigard Triangle. Several months ago, Council directed staff to begin the work necessary to amend the Comprehensive Plan by changing area in the Triangle presently designated low density and public facilities to general commercial. The first step was to conduct a transportation • study to see if the street network could support these changes. The report reviewed by Council indicates that without making any changes to the transportation network, the proposed land use changes will lead,to a,service level of °F" at almost all intersections•iri the Triangle:area. • . _ .. �; -p.- t ,a• -.tr.a• ._ ,, riw•ead::t , �y • The-consultant reviewed potential transportation strategies which were offered in •ttie•report.: CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 30, 1995,- PAGE 1 , • ID •14, • • There will be a 'Town Hai' type of meeting with the residents and commercial property owners in the area on June 6 at 7 p.m. to discuss options. ODOT has concerns with a rezone of the area. The Mayor asked that a representative from ODOT also be at this Town Hall meeting to tell the persons attending what these concerns are. Randy McCourt of DOS Associates reviewed the consultant report. Robin McArthur Phillips of the Oregon Department of Transportation was present, and advised that with regard to traffic impacts and resulting needs for transportation improvements, there is no available funding. Any transportation improvements would have to be submitted in the six year transportation program; it would be ten to fifteen years before any improvements would be realized. Council discussed the various alternatives offered, including the 1-5/217 study, which may offer some benefit to the area by identification of transportation improvements. • USA EFFLUENT WATER FOR COOK PARK IRRIGATION Property Manager John Acker reviewed his memorandum, which is on file in the Council packet material. After discussion, Council consensus was to approve that staff pursue the concept of cooperating with the Tualatin Country Club and the City of Tualatin in a project to build an effluent water distribution system for irrigation. • SELECTION OF CONSULTANT FOR WATER RATE STUDY Councilor Hunt noted the recent Intergovernmental Water Board review of consultants for the water rate study. After brief discussion, City Council members decided to consider this matter on June 13, 1995. BUSINESS MEETING 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA: • Jack Polans, 16000 SW Queen Victoria Place, Kng City, Oregon, 97224, questioned whether the effluent water project as referred to in Mr. Acker's report to Council during the Study Session would have any effect on the Intergovernmental Water Board. Mayor Nicoli advised this was independent of the IWB; the agreement would be among the City of Tigard, City of Tualatin and Tualatin Country Club. City Administrator Monahan pointed out this would represent a water conservation measure by using effluent water, rather than potable water, to irrigate Cook Park. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY.30, 1995 - PAGE 2 S • Mr. Polans questioned the status of the Dolan case. Mayor Nicoll noted some of the information Mr. Polans was requesting was privileged (potential and pending litigation), and he could not respond, as,those issues are under negotiation. He advised Mr. Polans that a public hearing on the matter was tentatively scheduled for June 27,-1995; a staff report would be available one week in advance. Councilor Scheckla added that the Dolans and their attorneys have asked for the extra time on this matter. • Martha Bishop, 10590 SW Cook Lane, Tigard, Oregon, 97223, spoke with regard to Music in the Park. She noted the purpose of the effort by Music in the Park supporters was to provide a facility for musical and cultural programs for the public. She noted that people have approached her and indicated they are interested in the concept She said she would appreciate unanimous support by City Council of the Music in the Park concept. • Mary Payne, 16277 SW 130th Terrace,Tigard, Oregon, 97223, advised she was a member of the Music in the Park committee. She noted this effort had begun about twenty years ago; however, funding was transferred to provide for soccer fields. The original plan has been resurrected. Cook Park is the park of choice because of the ability to provide police protection. They would like to have a permanent stage of treated wood on concrete, similar to other improvements already in place at Cook Park. In the past, stage presentations were conducted on flatbed trucks; however, there are concerns about liability (safety issues) with this type of structure. Ms. Payne thanked Council in advance for their support. There was discussion about when Council would consider funding for this proposal. When discussed at the last Council meeting, the plan was to have Council consider funding once'the committee had put together a proposal with consideration of funding scheduled for June 13, 1995. • Gene McAdams, 13420 SW Brittany Drive, Tigard, Oregon, distributed information to Council which supported his assertion that the 130th/Winterlake connection has been part of the planned connection in the area as it has developed over the years. He recommended that Council remember, when setting capital improvement project priorities, that 130th/Winterlake is a collector street. (Handouts distributed by Mr. McAdams are on file with the Council meeting packet) • Mr. McAdams noted the Planning Commission approved the Capital Improvement Project list by a six-to-one vote at their last meeting. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 30, 1995 - PAGE 3 • • 3. CONSENT AGENDA: Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: 3.1 City Council Minutes: May 16, 1995 3.2 Local Contract Review Board: a. Award Janitorial Contract to Pony Express and Authorize the City Administrator to Sign Contract b. Accept Quote from Kerr Contractors Inc. for Installing 1,000 Lineal Feet of 12-inch Ductile Iron Water Main on S.W. Beef Bend Road Motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoll and Councilors Hawley, Hunt, Rohlf, and Scheckla voted "yes., 4. PUBUC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 95-0001/ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 95-0002 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT A request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Map from C-P (Commercial Professional)and Low-Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential,and to change the zoning from C-P and R-4.5 to R-25. LOCATION: South of SW Pfaffle Street at SW 83rd Avenue (WCTM 1S1 36CC, tax lots 200, 300, 400 and 2200). APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA: Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.2, 2, 6, 8 and 12; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.22, 18.32 and 18.56. ZONE: Currently, two parcels (3.44 acres) are C-P and two parcels (2.07 acres) are R-4.5. The C-P zone allows groups of businesses and offices in centers to provide opportunities for employment and for business and .professional services. The R-4.5 district allows single-family residential units, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, family day care, and home occupations among other uses. a. Public Hearing was opened. b. Declarations or Challenges. Mayor Nicoli read the following statement: - Do any members of Council wish to report any ex parte contact or information gained outside the hearing, including any site visits? (None were reported.) - Have all members familiarized themselves with the application? (All indicated they had familiarized themselves with the application.) - Are there any challenges from the audience pertaining to the Council's jurisdiction to hear this matter or is there a challenge on CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 30, 1995 - PAGE 4 • • • the participation of any member of the Council? (There were none.) c. Staff Report. Associate Planner Ray Valone summarized the staff report. Mr. Valone referred to a map indicating location of the proposal. He referred to comments from the Oregon Department of Transportation. (See letter from ODOT on file with the Council packet material.) In general, ODOT does not oppose this Comprehensive Plan Amendment and re-zone. Mr. Valone advised that staff agrees that a mistake has been made and this would warrant that the request of the applicant be granted... • The portion of the subject site now zoned C-P has no direct access to SW Pacific Highway and does not have good visibility from the highway. Trips to any commercial business activity would be required to use SW Pfaffle to get to the site. This would draw commercial traffic through a predominantly residential area. • The portion of the subject site now zoned R-4.5, low density residential, no longer meets locational criteria It abuts Pacific Highway on the south and the commercially zoned lot on the SW corner of SW Hall and Pfaffle. • New apartment development has occurred on the corner of SW Hall and Pfaffle. This is not indicative of an area 'committed to low density development'. Based on the above, a mistake can be said to have been made in the original plan designation for these properties. There are terrain differences and access problems which separate these lots from the other commercial zones and business activities fronting on SW Pacific Highway. Surrounding features such as Hall Blvd. and Pacific Highway, as well as being adjacent to commercial zones, takes the R-4.5 lots out of an area committed to low density development. Council then asked several questions to clarify issues on this property and about the uses of adjacent properties. It was noted there are single-family homes in the area which will remain. There were some questions with regard to traffic patterns/concerns. Associate Planner Valone advised those issues would be addressed during the pre-application meeting at the time a development project is proposed. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 30, 1995 - PAGE 5 ' a 411 • d. Public Testimony. Mayor Nicoll read the following statement: For all those wishing to testify, please be aware that failure to raise an issue with sufficient specificity to afford the Council and parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals on this issue. Testimony and evidence must be directed toward the criteria that staff will describe or other criteria in the plan or land use regulation which you believe apply to the decision. Spencer Vale, 4505 NE 24th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97211, testified on behalf of the applicant. He said they concurred with staff findings and asked that Council approve the request. Mr. Vale noted there are four properties included in the application and authorization was received from all property owners named in the application. He noted the reason the properties were put together as a package is because it appeared this would create a logical re-zone of the area and could be completed in one process. He referred to the traffic analysis which is contained in the Council packet. Mr. Vale advised there was a neighborhood meeting plus a hearing. before the Planning Commission. No objections have been raised by property owners. Jack Polans, 16000 SW Queen Victoria Place, King City, Oregon, 97224, stated that this property represented more development and more traffic. He recommended that ODOT be aware of and do something about increased traffic which resulted in more auto-exhaust pollutants. He noted the traffic auto exhaust emissions contribute to a higher risk of cancer. e. Council Questions Associate Planner Valone clarified for Councilor Scheckla the urban planning area agreement and its effect on zoning of the property at the time of annexation in 1987. The property when viewed in relationship to the surrounding properties, advised Mr. Valone, appears to be zoned erroneously. f. Public Hearing was closed. g. Staff Recommendation. Associate Planner Valone advised the staff recommends that City Council approve the proposed application. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 30, 1995 - PAGE 6 • • i. ORDINANCE NO. 95-10 - AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE REQUESTED BY ANDREWS MANAGEMENT (CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002). j. Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to adopt Ordinance No. 95-10. k. Motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoll and Councilors Hawley, Hunt, Rohif, and Scheckla voted "yes.") 5. PUBLIC HEARING (LEGISLATIVE) -ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA) 95-0001 ROBINSON/BOWEN PROPOSED AMENDMENTS ■ A proposal to amend Tigard Community Development Code Sections 18.26.030, 18.26.030(B)(4), 18.26.030(B)(5), 18.26.030(c)(3), 18.180.080(A) and 18.80.120(3)(1) to allow fee simple townhomes in the planned development district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning goals 1, 2, 9, 10 and 12; Comprehensive Plan • Policies 1, 2 and 6; Community Development Code Chapter 18.030. a. Public Hearing was opened. b. Staff Report. Senior Planner Bewersdorff introduced Associate Planner Will D'Andrea who summarized the staff report for Council. Mr. D'Andrea reviewed the current and proposed language in the Community Developrrient Code with regard to single-family attached, common wall town homes. Mr. D'Andrea advised the Planning Commission recommended approval. There was clarification of the cluster parking concept which would allow some parking to be elsewhere on the site rather than directly in front of the residence. c. Public Testimony. Applicant: Mike Robinson, 900 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 2300, Portland, Oregon, 97204, testified on behalf of the applicant. He noted he agreed with the staff and Planning Commission recommendation. He advised the architect, Mr. Bob Moreland, was also present and available to answer any questions. Mr. Robinson asked Council to approve the ordinance with an emergency clause in order to make the ordinance effective immediately. Mr. Robinson _ advised he would be glad to draft findings to support the emergency clause. - CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 30, 1995 - PAGE 7 • • • t Opponent: Jack Polans, 16000 SW Queen Victoria Place, ling City, Oregon, 97224, requested clarification of the type of dwellings proposed. Mr. Polans noted concerns with this type of housing and that it would bring down the value of other housing. d. Council Questions. Council discussed the requested emergency clause for the proposed ordinance. Legal Counsel Beery advised that emergency clauses are granted in those instances where there is a need for the ordinance immediately to provide for the public welfare and good. In absence of compelling evidence, an emergency clause should not be used. With regard to timing concerns of the applicant, it was noted the applicant could begin processing their development application, with the final approvals to be delayed until after the thirty-day waiting period for the effective date of the ordinance. There was Council discussion on this type of housing and its acceptance by existing residents. Senior Planner Bewersdorff noted that, generally, - residents already in an area would prefer to have a development with this type of housing over multi-family housing. There were also questions with regard to driveway set-backs and private streets•usually within such developments. Private streets would be maintained by the developer. e. Public Hearing closed. f. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommended approval of the application as presented. g. Council Consideration: Councilors noted in general they had no problems with the proposed application; however, Councilors did note they could not see any value or reasoning to add an emergency clause to the ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 95-11 - AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND PROVISIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE, SECTIONS 18.26, 18.56, 18.80, AND 18.164 TO PERMIT SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED COMMON WALL TOWN HOMES ON FEE SIMPLE OWNERSHIP LOTS. h. Motion by Councilor Rohtf, seconded by Councilor Hawley, to approve Ordinance No. 95-11. - CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 30, 1995 - PAGE 8 s • • • Motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoll and Councilors Hawley, Hunt, Rohtf, and Scheckla voted ayes." 6. NON-AGENDA ITEMS. a. Music in the Park Council discussed this issue at length. They considered possible funding options and the number of events which might be held. Councilor Hunt advised he wanted to make funding available so the committee sponsoring this program could make plans for the summer. After some discussion, Councilor Hunt withdrew a motion he had made (seconded by Councilor Scheckla) to allocate $5,000 to the City Administrator to provide temporary facilities for the summer. Mayor Nicoli and individual Councilors noted they were in agreement with the concept of the Music in the Park program. It was decided that Council would delay action until June 13, 1995. In the interim, staff will be meeting with the committee members, at which time details and a proposal will be prepared for Council review. b. Tualatin River Watershed Council Council considered membership on the newly formed Tualatin River Watershed Council at the May 23, 1995, Council meeting. At that meeting, Councilors Hunt and Scheckla advised they were not in support. Mayor Nicoli and Councilor Hawley had advised they would support membership. Councilor Rohff was not present at the May 23 meeting; therefore, Council decided to delay final consideration of this item until the May 30 meeting in order to obtain comments from Councilor Rohff. City Administrator Monahan summarized this agenda item and advised he supported membership on the Watershed Council. This Council will provide a central source of information on current research and activities related to the health and management of the Watershed. It also would provide a forum for coordinating the research and activities of the large number of agencies and organizations involved in watershed protection. Councilor Rohff advised he saw no reason not to be involved. He noted that if dollars would be requested at a later time, then Council could discuss future participation at that point The majority consensus of Council was to approve membership,on the Tualatin River Watershed Council. (Note: Mayor Nicoli and Councilors Hawley and Rohff supported membership; Councilors Hunt and Scheckla were against membership.) CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 30, 1995 - PAGE 9 • • C. MPAC Membership Council nominated Mayor Nicoli as a candidate to serve as the alternate Washington County cities delegate to the Metro Policy Advisory Committee. d. 1-5/217 Interchange Mayor Nicoli updated the work to date on the 1-5/217 interchange. He advised four to five new designs for the intersection have been identified. Funding will be a problem. The proposals identified will take approximately $11 million dollars more than what funds are available. Mayor Nicoli noted the proposed improvements could probably be built in two phases. In addition, fees for the consultant will be more than originally anticipated; Tigard has paid $12,500, so far, as their share. It may be necessary for the different agencies involved to provide in-house assistance; (i.e., printing and mailings); in order to avoid paying more dollars in consultant fees. Mayor Nicoli noted that within two to three weeks maps identifying options will be available. These options address the problems that the Cities of Lake Oswego and Tigard had with the previous "Phoenix Plan" offered by the Oregon Department of Transportation. It was noted that the East CIT will be getting an update on this issue at their next meeting. City Administrator Monahan noted that, to date, residents from the Lake Oswego area have dominated the attendance at open house sessions offered by the planners of the project. He advised he would like to see more Tigard people attend these meetings. e. Tigard Triangle Transportation Plan Review A meeting will take place next week as was announced by Mayor Nicoli at the beginning of the meeting. Mayor Nicoli noted he did not think the State Highway Department will oppose what Tigard plans to do in the Triangle. In looking at the incremental change between what is currently zoned in the proposed Comprehensive Plan and what the changes would offer, Mayor Nicoli reported that Mr. Warner, Region 1 Director of ODOT, appeared to be willing to acknowledge that this was an incremental change they could live with. In addition, Mayor Nicoll noted Tigard would not have to find funding for everything. Council briefly discussed what would occur at the meeting on June 6. Single-family homeowners and other property owners need to be advised of the Oregon Department of Transportation's role as Tigard considers zone changes. It may be that if Tigard proceeds with zone changes, then CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 30, 1995 - PAGE 10 • - • additional time will be needed to put those changes in place. Council discussed the need to give this information to the residents so they are aware of why the process is moving slower now. The benefits to derive at the June 6 meeting would include identification of options available in the Triangle, assist the property owners and residents to understand what the problems are, and to ask the Oregon Department of Transportation to give a presentation to the meeting participants. In addition, the possibility of forming a committee or task force for this area comprised of interested persons was briefly considered. It was noted the meeting on June 6 would be conducted as an informational meeting, with no Council deliberation scheduled. f. Tigard Feed and Seed Store A meeting of interested parties will occur on May 31, 1995 at Tigard City Hall at 5:30 p.m. g. Council discussed the possibility of receiving transportation impact fee funds (T1F) from the City of Durham. Durham may be willing to contribute some funds toward the traffic signal at 79th and Durham. The City of Durham has - few projects they can identify to utilize their TIF funds, and because the school is adjacent to the City and serves children from their City, it may be possible that these TIF funds can be used to help put in the traffic signal. 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Cancelled 8. ADJOURNMENT: 10:14 p.m. gt-11-1,utA,.4. Gt Attest: / Catherine Wheatley, City Recorde Ma City of Tigard • Date: C.'(a 7 (q)- ccmO53o.95 • CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 30, 1995 - PAGE 11 C2A- 9-�- oo/ CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting Minutes April 17, 1995 1. CALL TO ORDER President Fyre called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The meeting was held in the Tigard Civic Center, Town Hall, at 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: President Fyre; Commissioners DeFrang, Griffith, Holland, Moore, Scolar, and Wilson Commissioners Absent: Commissioners Collson and Saxton Staff Present: Senior Planner, Dick Bewersdorff; Assistant Planner Will D'Andrea; Assistant Planner Ray- Valone; , Planning Commission Secretary Jerree Gaynor 3. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES Commissioner Holland moved and Commissioner DeFrang seconded a motion to approve the April 3, 1995, meeting minutes as submitted. A voice vote was taken and the motion passed. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS None at this time 5. PUBLIC HEARING 5.1 CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT REQUEST: Amend the Comprehensive Plan map from C-P (Commercial Professional) and Low Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential and change the zoning from C-P and R-4.5 to R-25. LOCATION: South of SW Pfaffle Street at SW 83rd Avenue (WCTM 1S1 36CC, lots 200, 300, 400 and 2200). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: The relevant criteria in this case are Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, 6.1.1, 8.1.1, 8.2.2, and 12.1.3; and Community Development Code chapters 18.22, 18.32 and 18.56. STAFF REPORT Assistant Planner Ray Valone reported to the commission on this proposal to amend the comprehensive plan map and rezone 5.51 acres to medium- high density residential. He stated that 4 parcels of land were involved; 2 parcels are currently zoned low density residential 4.5 with single family, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - April 17, 1995 -Page 1 , • • houses on them. The other 2 parcels are zoned commercial professional and are both vacant. Valone stated that responses received from Engineering, Building, Police, and Unified Sewerage Agency contained no objections to the proposal. He said that ODOT had sent a letter stating they did not oppose the zone change, but did have some concerns about traffic. ODOT did acknowledge that at buildout under the proposal, there will be fewer trips generated than under the current zoning. Valone stated that the proposal meets all applicable comprehensive plan and development code criteria. He said that the proposal will generate fewer traffic trips and will contribute to the city's housing opportunity goal. He said that staff recommends the planning commission forward a recommendation for approval to city council. In response to a question from Commissioner Holland, Valone stated that Pfaffle Street is a minor collector. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Spencer Vail,4505 NE 24th Ave., Portland,OR 97211, representing Andrews Management spoke to the commission. He stated that the applicant agreed with the staff conclusions and findings of this proposal. He referred to a transportation impact analysis prepared by Kittleson &Associates. The report indicated that, at full buildout, the traffic would be less than if it would be if the property were to remain at its present zoning designation. Commissioner Griffith asked Mr. Vail about the timeline for buildout on and which streets would be impacted by traffic. Commissioner DeFrang commented on the bad intersection at corner of Hall and Pfaffle. Commissioner Moore asked who would determine and who would be responsible for a traffic signal at this intersection. Dick Bewersdorff said that it is possible a traffic signal could become a condition of the development. CITIZEN INPUT Paul Brossia, 11260 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223, stated that he was not opposed to the zone change and he is in favor of increased density, but he is concerned about the increase in traffic on Pfaffle Street and possible accidents at the intersection of Pfaffle and Hall. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Commissioner Griffith moved to recommend to council that they accept the proposal. Commissioner Holland seconded the motion. A voice vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - April 17, 1995 -Page 2 • • 5.2 TUP 95-0001 NORTHWEST LANDSCAPING REQUEST: Applicant requests Temporary Use approval for the placement and temporary use of three modular offices. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.140, 18.70. LOCATION: 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road (WCTM 2S1 13AB,tax lots 300,400 and 500), (WCTM 2S1 12DC,tax lots 1100 and 1200). North of SW Durham Road, south of 72nd Avenue, and east of SW Upper Boones Ferry Road. ZONE: I-L (Light Industrial) The Light Industrial zoning allows public support facilities, parking facilities, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing,wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. STAFF REPORT Assistant Planner Will D'Andrea reported that, due to the temporary nature of the application versus the permanent status of the easement and that there will be no new employees, the Planning Division is willing to drop the condition of requiring an easement. In response to Commissioner Griffith, Dick Bewersdorff stated that the temporary use, in this case, is for one year. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Steve Morasch from Schwabe, Williamson, and Wyatt, Pacwest Center, Suites 1600-1800, 1211 SW Fifth Ave., Portland, OR 97204-3795, spoke for the applicant. He said that he agrees with staff. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Commissioner Holland moved to uphold the applicant's appeal of TUP 95- 0001. Commissioner Wilson seconded the motion. A voice vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously. 5.3 ZOA 95-0001 BOWEN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY REQUEST: A request by Bowen Development Company to amend the following Tigard Community Development Code Sections in order to permit attached, common wall town homes on 'fee' simple ownership lots: 18.26.030(B)(4), 18.26.030(B)(5), 18.26.030(C)(3), 18.26.030-Compatibility Matrix, 18.80.080(A)(c)(i), 18.80.120(3)(j). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.32.120. LOCATION: City wide.5.1 STAFF REPORT Assistant Planner Will D'Andrea explained that this request was to modify sections of the community development code to allow attached common wall town homes. The current code allows for two single family, common wall attached units on two separate properties. The proposed amendments would allow for more than two units. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - April 17, 1995 -Page 3 • D'Andrea said that the minimum lot sizes and density would be the same as the underlying zone. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Mike Robinson, 900 SW Fifth, suite 2300, Portland, OR 97209, spoke on behalf of the applicant. He outlined the proposal and what the applicant hoped to accomplish. He pointed out that it would not increase the density or change any of the uses; it would primarily affect districts with planned development overlays. Robert Moreland, 1022 SW Salmon, Portland, OR 97201, responded to a question from Commissioner Wilson about reduced garage setbacks. He emphasized the importance of not reducing the density that could be achieved and not diminishing the flexibility of grouping the houses. He stated that extra parking could possibly be obtained in a common parking lot. President Fyre remarked that the 8' setback would apply to a private drive, not a public street. The setback from a public street would be 20 feet. Senior Planner Dick Bewersdorff said that when the development was submitted for site design review, the parking could be evaluated. OPPOSITION Robert Bledsoe, 11800 SW Walnut,Tigard,OR 97223,expressed his concerns about allowing this type of development in an R-4.5 area. He suggested using the 'townhouse' definition of the code to allow row houses in higher density zoned areas. Discussion followed on density transfers and the clustering of houses in an R-4.5 zone. Assistant Planner D'Andrea explained that the houses would be closer together, but the overall density would not changed. Senior Planner Bewersdorff said that in this case there would be more open space. APPLICANT'S REBUTTAL Mike Robinson maintained that people would not be able to do this type of development in any zone without a planned development overlay. He also remarked that applicants for duplexes or single family attached houses must seek conditional use approval from the planning commission. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED After some discussion, Commissioner Moore moved to forward a recommendation to city council to approve ZOA 95-0001. Commissioner Holland seconded the motion. The motion was carried by majority vote. Commissioner Wilson abstained. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - April 17, 1995 -Page 4 • 6. OTHER BUSINESS None at this time 7. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:32 p.m. Je Gaynor, an ingommission Secretary i✓ A Pres��%= r iI Fyre PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - April 17, 1995 - Page 5 P 003 229 836 clip. Receipt for • Certified Mail No Insurance Coverage Provided Do not use for International Mail . (See Reverse) Sent to DEPT. LAND CONSERV./DEVEL. Street and No. 1175 COURT STREET, NE P.O.,State and ZIP Code SALEM, OR 97310-0590 Postage - $ , 78 Certified Fee / ,id Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delive W I 0,9 2 cn Return R= �• ng ,1 a to Who f'� oeliv�r=i 1 l > 0 Return R;y.a Showinirto, hot: } c Date,an• ressee'sstAddress , Ii • T&OTAL Fe P:•: r es _ A ■ 0 Postmark or b' r E 0 u_ . . 4.t) a n. I d SENDER: 1 ;o I als' •ish'to rectwe the W • Complete items 1 a�' 2 for additional services. m • Complete items 3, i,a&b. followinervices (for an extra c0i • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can fee): .? > return this card to you. m • Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space 1. ❑ Addressee's Address to does not permit. G I L • Write"Return Receipt Requested"on the mailpiece below the article number. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery + "' • The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date m c delivered. Consult postmaster for fee. 0 m 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number P 003 229 836 11, 1 E DEPT. OF LAND CONSERVATION & 4b. Service Type DEVELOPMENT ❑ Registered ❑ Insured '1 y 1175 COURT STREET, NE X Certified _, ❑ COD .c c M SALEM, OR 97310-0590 ❑ Express Mail ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise c O 7. Date of Avery 2 Q JUR / 2 5. Signature (Addressee) 8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested n and fee is paid) c co cc 6. 'Signature (Agent) ~ T PS Form 3811, December 1991 YrU.S.GPO:1993-352-714 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT ---- - __f NOTICE OF ADOPTION • This form must be mailed to DLCD not later than 5 working days after adoption ORS 197.615 and OAR Chapter 660,Division 18 See reverse side for submittal requirements Jurisdiction GiTY of C-,A4.-1s. Local File#`C?,, 4S cool f ZIAN I - Li Z. Date of Adoption ttA' 30 l' 4 S Date Mailed T 1 , 1 11 5— Date the Proposed Notice was mailed to DLCD 14..t La 16 t 117 5' Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment SC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Land Use Regulation Amendment SC Zoning Map Amendment _ New Land Use Regulation Summarize the adopted amendment. Do not use technical terms. Do not write "See Attached." A14E,..)bEl 'ttA C.T'( Cvn1Pe.ft64/5Cu : PLa.J yttP F•ea•1 lorirceccc4L /s,C SS(o-L14L(3.44 Ac 11,A IS Law .r i‘,u6rr l K reS:oc. Jtt g L /2.c,-/ Tt rt h ce4,41-Nid LA n c:�Si rY st0�-v71:.4rt A.e0 (Ay,..a6:15 71A-' Zoti:^(, iKA, F✓cs■A-1 C—P (3.44 .4c.. A old.6 R-4-S f'z.07 Ac..) '1j - LS ( 5wit ••'4 ) . Describe how the adopted amendment differs from the proposed amendment. If it is the same, write "Same." If you did not give notice of the proposed amendment,write "N/A." Gv A-04.4.6-.& 74 L P,wrc-55,-6-&4 L -- Plan Map Change From `E L A.) oNks4xsire P--�3c e6..1,;41- to M -14."6,LA D,.cs,r{ 4-s, 41 t Zone Map Change From C-P P i; R- 4-s to K-2 S S c. u o P s 2 #W- a ;1k Location:,St...) 53 a" i�rt.asecoAJ 3\5r N c tAlA o f Acres Involved: S.S) 14-w`( ail `i5 L...) .7 ese tf ac s-s t Specify Density: Pre ious Density A s Z 0 ac. New Density (t a (4 A..TS • (c Applicable Goals: 1 $2 ,t o $)Z$ 1 A Was an Exception adopted? _ Yes No DLCD File# DLCD Appeal Deadline r O Did DLCD receive a Notice of Proposed Amendment 45 days prior to the final hearing? JC Yes 4 No: _ The Statewide Planning Goals do not apply _ Emergency Circumstances Required Expedited Review Affected State or Federal Agencies, Local Governments or Special Districts: £LLo , o0 Local Contact: A � L-0 Phone: ( 3 5 4 11 ) An-a Address: 1312-C (.L& Z. Is>✓\1o. • .71 ,tva a1Z '1 Z SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS • ORS 197.615 and OAR Chapter 660,Division 18 1. Send this Form and One (1) Copy of the Adopted Amendment to: Department of Land Conservation and Development 1175 Court Street, N.E. Salem, Oregon 97310-0590 2. Submit three (3) copies of bound documents and maps larger than 81/2 by 11 inches. 3. Adopted materials must be sent to DLCD not later than five (5) working days following the date of the final decision on the amendment 4. Submittal of this Notice of Adoption must include the text of the amendment plus adopted fmdings and supplementary information. 5. The deadline to appeal will be extended if you do not submit this Notice of Adoption within five working days of the final decision. Appeals to LUBA may be filed within 21 days of the date Notice of Adoption is sent to DLCD. 6. In addition to sending Notice of Adoption to DLCD, you must notify persons who. participated in the local hearing and requested notice of the final decision. If you need more copies of this form,please call the DLCD at 503-373-0050 or this form may be duplicated on green paper. v • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 95- II) AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE REQUESTED BY ANDREWS MANAGEMENT (CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002) . WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a comprehensive plan map amendment and zone change from Low Density Residential/R4 . 5 to Medium-High Density Residential/R-25 on two parcels (1S1 36CC, lots 300 and 400) and from C-P (Commercial Professional) /C-P to Medium-High Density Residential/R- 25 on two parcels (1S1 36CC, lots 200 and 2200) ; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for the proposed amendment and zone change at its meeting of April 17, 1995, and recommends approval of CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 . THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The proposed amendment is consistent with all relevant criteria based upon the facts, findings and conclusions noted in the attached final order (Exhibit A) ; SECTION 2 : The City Council concurs with the Planning Commission and staff recommendations and approves the request to designate the parcels illustrated on the attached map (Exhibit B) . SECTION 3 : This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor, and posting by the City. Recorder. PASSED: By Lif i.V11YY101..5 vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this 3cre" day of —Mal , 1995. 1a (1)) C erine Wheatley, Ci Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this t) day of A 1995. Jai - ,icoli, Mayor Approved as to form: s City Attorney Date ORDINANCE No. 95- iD Page 1 n • • EXHIBIT A CITY OF TIGARD CITY COUNCIL FINAL ORDER A FINAL ORDER INCLUDING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS WITH REGARD TO AN APPLICATION FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE REQUESTED BY ANDREWS MANAGEMENT. The Tigard City Council reviewed the application below at a public hearing on May 30, 1995. The City Council approves the request. The Council has based its decision on the facts, findings and conclusions noted below. A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 95-0001 Zone Change ZON 95-0002 REQUEST: Amend the Comprehensive Plan map from C-P (Commercial Professional) and Low Density • Residential to Medium-High Density Residential and change the zoning from C-P and R-4 . 5 to R-25. APPLICANT: Andrews Management . 4000 SW Kruse Way Place Building 1, Suite 270 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 OWNERS: Arthur & Margaret Verharen Paul & Anna Herberholz 12435 SW 60th 8400 SW Pfaffle Street Portland, OR 97219 Tigard, OR 97223 McGuire, Robert/William/ ODOT James and Thomas Region 1/Property Mgmt Dowell, Sarah 5320 SW Macadam 8470 SW Pfaffle Street Portland, OR 97201 Tigard, OR 97223 REPRESENTATIVE: Spencer Vail, Planning Consultant 4505 NE 24th Avenue Portland, OR 97211 LOCATION: South of SW Pfaffle Street at SW 83rd Avenue (WCTM 1S1 36CC, lots 200, 300, 400 and 2200) 2 . Vicinity The four affected parcels, containing 5. 51 acres, are located 1 • • along SW Pfaffle Street, north of Pacific Highway and east of SW Hall Boulevard (see map, Exhibit B) . The properties to the north across SW Pfaffle Street are designated as Low and Medium Density Residential with a zoning of R-4 . 5, R-7 and R- 12 ; to the east are properties zoned C-P and include the General Motors Training Center and some vacant parcels; to the south is Highway 217; and to the west are three small parcels zoned C-P which include a cellular telephone monopole and a single family house. 3 . Background Information Parcels A and B were annexed to the city and zoned R-4 . 5 in 1987 as part of the south Metzger annexation. Parcel C was annexed to the city in 1969 by the present owners. Parcel D, owned by ODOT, is within the original area of incorporation of the city. Parcels C and D are zoned C-P. No development applications have been reviewed for any of the four parcels. The Planning Commission held a hearing on this proposal on April 17, 1995, and unanimously recommends approval. 4 . Site Information and Proposal Description The triangular site of 5.51 acres is comprised of four parcels. Parcels A and B front on SW Pfaffle Street and have single family houses on them. Parcel C fronts on SW Pfaffle Street and is vacant. Parcel D is vacant and has no roadway access. All of the parcels are relatively flat but are situated approximately 20 feet above Highway 217 along their southern boundary. The applicant requests a comprehensive plan map amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential and from C-P (Commercial Professional) to Medium-High Density Residential; and a zone change from R-4 . 5 to R-25 and from C-P to R-25 on the four properties as follows (see map) : • Low Density Residential/R-4. 5 to Medium-High Density Residential/R-25: - Parcel A: WCTM 1S1 36CC, lot 400 (0. 82 acres) - Parcel B: WCTM 1S1 36CC, lot 300 (1. 25 acres) • C-P (Commercial Professional) /C-P to Medium-High Density Residential/R-25: - Parcel C: WCTM 1S1 36CC, lot 200 (2 . 55 acres) - Parcel D: WCTM 1S1 36CC, lot 2200 (0. 89 acres) A written document, transportation analysis and preliminary site plan have been submitted by the applicant. The written document and analysis are included as part of this staff report. The site plan was submitted as an example of what 2 • could be done on the site. Because the proposed action is a land use change and not a development application, the site plan is not part of this report, though it will be entered into the record as being part of the application. 5. Agency Comments The Engineering and Building divisions, Police Department and the Unified Sewerage Agency have reviewed the proposal and have no objections. No other comments were received at the time of this report. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Comprehensive Plan policies 2 . 1. 1, 6. 1. 1, 8 . 1. 1, 8.2 .2, and 12. 1. 3 ; Community Development Code chapters 18.22, 18. 32 and 18. 56; and Oregon Administrative Rule 660-12-060. 1. Policy 2 . 1. 1 states that the city shall maintain an ongoing citizen involvement program and shall assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process. The policy is satisfied because the surrounding property owners were given notice of public hearings related to the proposal and given the opportunity to comment on the proposal. The notices of hearings were also posted at Tigard City Hall and advertised in a local newpaper. In addition, the applicant provided notice of and conducted a meeting on January 13 , 1995, for interested property owners within a 250-foot radius of the affected properties. 2 . Policy 6. 1. 1 states that the city shall provide an opportunity for a diversity of housing densities and residential types at various prices and rent levels. The designation of the affected properties to Medium-High Density Residential and R- 25 will allow for the potential development of 137 units of housing. This change would contribute to a diversity of housing opportunities for the city. If approved, the proposal would also increase the housing opportunity index from 10. 38 to 10. 44 units per acre, thus helping to implement the Metropolitan Housing Rule by increasing the residential density in the city. 3 . Policy 8 . 1. 1 states that the city shall plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. The transportation impact analysis conducted by Kittelson and Associates, Inc. concludes that all the intersections studied along SW Pfaffle Street will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service during all time periods with full build out under the proposed zoning. Although forced-flow conditions created by traffic backed up from the SW 3 Dartmouth/Highway 99W intersection currently occur during the peak hour periods at the SW 78th Avenue/SW Pfaffle Street intersection, the proposed zoning change would have minimal impacts on this already-existing condition. The study found that the proposed zoning would result in 480 fewer trips on the transportation system than if the site was fully developed under the current zoning. 4 . Policy 8. 2.2, states, in part, that the city shall encourage the expansion and use of public transit by locating land intensive uses in close proximity to transitways. Tri-met offers bus service on Highway 99W and SW Hall Boulevard. The policy is satisfied, therefore, because the proposed redesignation would locate an intensive residential use within one quarter mile of a transit corridor. 5. Policy 12 . 1.3 lists the locational criteria for designating land as medium-high and high density residential on the plan map. The locational criteria can be construed in a flexible manner in the interest of accommodating proposals which are found to be in the public interest and capable of integration into the community. The burden of proving conformance with the criteria varies with the degree of change and impact on the community. The applicable locational criteria with findings are as follows: a. Areas which are not committed to low density development. Although Parcels A and B are currently zoned R-4 .5 and have single family houses on them, the area is not committed to low density development. The parcels were annexed to the city as part of the south Metzger area in 1987. They were the only annexed parcels located south of SW Pfaffle Street and were assigned an R-4 . 5 zoning along with all the properties north of the street. This was done despite the fact that the two-parcel area had C-P zoning on each side and Highway 217 along the southern border. Parcels C and D have always been zoned for commercial uses. b. Areas which can be buffered from low density residential areas in order to maximize the privacy of established low density residential areas. The proposed area can be adequately buffered from the low density residential area on the north side of SW Pfaffle Street through the density transition, buffering and screening requirements of the Community Development Code. These requirements would be met during subdivision review when an application is submitted to the city. c. Areas which have direct access from a major collector or arterial street. The proposed area is not located on a major collector or arterial street. SW Pfaffle Street is 4 classified as a minor collector by the city. The property is located, however, within 250 feet of SW Hall Boulevard, which is an arterial street. The Kittelson , analysis indicates that the amount of traffic that would be generated by the proposed plan amendment and zone change area, even if developed to the maximum allowable density, would be less than under the current zoning designations. Less traffic will mean less impact to the existing residential development north of SW Pfaffle Street. In addition, the proposed change to residential land use on the four parcels would be more in keeping with the residential character along this portion of SW Pfaffle Street than would commercial office land use. For these reasons, strict adherence to this criterion is not warranted in this case. d. Areas which are not subject to development limitations. There are no known development limitations on the proposed site. Detailed review of the site characteristics would be undertaken at the time of development application. e. Areas where the existing facilities have the capacity for additional development. The existing facilities and services have adequate capacity to accommodate additional development. The sanitary sewer, storm and water lines located along SW Pfaffle Street are capable of handling development allowed under the proposed changes. According to the traffic report, SW Pfaffle Street will operate at acceptable levels of service. Existing police and fire services are available and adequate for the site area. • f. Areas within one-quarter mile of public transit. Public transit is available on Pacific Highway and SW Hall Boulevard, which are within one-quarter mile of the site. g. Areas within one-quarter mile from neighborhood and general commercial shopping centers or business and office centers. Within one-quarter mile of the site is the Tigard Plaza on SW Hall and the Pacific Highway corridor with access to shopping and business/office centers. h. Areas adjacent to either private or public permanent.open space. There is no private or public permanent open space areas adjacent to the site. Despite this fact, the proposed plan amendment and zone change is in the public interest and is capable of harmonious integration into the community. The site would provide the capability of developing higher density, diverse housing along a 5 • • transportation corridor with'in an established urban area. Furthermore, the flexibility of this criterion is noted where other R-25 zoned areas exist in the city without adjacent open space. For these reasons, strict adherence to this criterion is not warranted in- this case. 6. Section 18.32 of the Community 'Development Code sets forth the procedural requirements for review of quasi-judicial plan amendments. The application has been processed in accordance with code sections 18 . 32 . 020, 18. 32 .050 and 18. 32 . 060; hearings have been conducted by the planning commission and city council according to 18. 32. 090 (D) and (E) ; and the requirements for notification of the hearing have been met according to 18. 32 . 130 and 18. 32 . 140. 7. Section 18.22 of the Community Development Code sets forth standards and procedures for quasi-judicial amendments to the plan and zoning district map as follows: A. A recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application for a quasi-judicial amendment shall be based on all of the following standards: 1. The applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designation and; the change will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the community. The applicable plan policies related to the proposal are reviewed above under section B (Findings and Conclusions) . 2 . The statewide planning goals adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197, until acknowledgement of the comprehensive plan and ordinances. The Tigard Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged, therefore specific review of each statewide planning goal is not applicable. Notice of filing this proposed amendment has been provided to the Department of Land Conservation and Development for comment at least 45 days prior to the final decision' date. 3 . The applicable standards of any provision of this code or other applicable implementing ordinance. Code section 18. 56 (Multiple-Family Residential) contains the standards for the R-25 zone. The proposed site could meet the standards listed under "dimensional requirements" and "additional requirements" for a development. Specific future site development improvements will be reviewed through the subdivision and/or site development review procedures to ensure consistency with this section's standards. 6 4 . Evidence of change in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to the property which is the subject of the development application. This criterion is met because there is evidence that a mistake was made in the designations of the comprehensive plan and zoning maps regarding the affected properties. Parcels A and B were annexed to the city in 1987 as part of the south Metzger area annexation. They were designated as Low Density Residential and zoned R-4.5 along with the properties north of SW Pfaffle Street and east of SW 83rd Avenue to comply with the Urban Planning Area Agreement (UPAA) with the county. At the time of annexation, the parcels were zoned Washington County R-5. However, it could be argued that a mistake was made at the time of designation since they were the only annexed parcels located south of SW Pfaffle Street, and the only ones zoned for residential land use. Furthermore, at the time of annexation the parcels were, and still are, bordered on the north by medium density residential, on the east and west by C-P zoned property and on the south by Highway 217 . This area is not, therefore, committed to low density residential. The UPAA did allow for an exception to the zoning requirement if the city and county agreed at the time of annexation that the county designation was outdated. Given their location within a commercial and higher density area, the zoning on the two parcels was outdated at the time of annexation. Parcels C and D are zoned C-P. Parcel C was annexed to the city in 1969 and has remained vacant. Parcel D, currently owned by ODOT, has been part of the city since its incorporation and has remained vacant as well. Access to Parcel C is via SW Pfaffle Street only. This parcel has very limited visibility for a commercial land use due to its location and elevation above Highway 217 . Parcel D has no direct access to a street. It is a triangular-shaped parcel that is land-locked by Parcel C to the north, the GM Training Center to the east and the Highway 217 north bound on-ramp to the south. The fact that no commercial development has been proposed on these parcels since the C-P zone was established may very well reflect their location and orientation. Due to the preceding evidence, the planning staff concurs with the applicant and concludes that mistakes and/or inconsistencies were made in the comprehensive plan and zoning maps regarding the affected four parcels. 8 . Chapter 12 , Section 060 of the Transportation Planning Rule requires that amendments to comprehensive plans which significantly affect a transportation facility shall assure 7 • that allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity and level of service of the facility. An amendment significantly affects a facility if it changes the functional classification of an existing or planned facility, changes standards implementing a classification system, allows land uses which would result in levels of service which are inconsistent with the classification, or reduces the level of service of the facility below the minimum acceptable level. This criterion is met for the following reasons. The amendment and zone change would not change the functional classification of SW Pfaffle Street or SW Hall Boulevard; the proposed residential land use is not inconsistent with the functional classification of the street system in the area; and the traffic level of service generated by the proposal would not reduce the street system below the minimum level. The traffic consultant report found that the SW Hall/SW Pfaffle intersection will operate at an acceptable level of service during both the weekday AM and PM peak hours, and that potential development under the proposed change would result in 480 fewer trips than development under the current zoning. C. DECISION The City Council approves the requested comprehensive plan amendment and zone change to designate the following properties as Medium-High Density Residential on the comprehensive plan map and R-25 on the zoning map: WCTM 1S1 36CC, lots 200, 300, 400 and 2200 The Council finds that the change will promote the general welfare of the city and will not be significantly detrimental and injurious to surrounding land uses. 8 . • • EXHIBIT B I I , m, i > _ i 1 ► I I ► 1 I I SPRUC I SPRU( 1 TagraPIIIIIIIIINes II THORN ST ,.al. _AI I I l t ,' , I.A '1 ., 1,11111-1144 `>f 111 • AC H a w h N , o r------ Z • z i-_._^iLic�r_c_r._c% / PEA - ST Z ililt W , CIC 5 4 0 , • F . r '4 V II Oft 00, lko 9 ��II u. ill o IA t•■•■ %,, ,t 4 r:‹.. '- . . . ,„, 1,v, .....r '%s i I‘ , � .mi j � , 0 —ad tg- ■4,- VICINITY EXHIBIT MAP •••-•••"" PROPOSED F FROM LOW PLAN "" CHANGE FROM LOW DENSITY LA MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND ZONE CHANGE FROM R-4.5 TO R-25 f 4 CHANGE FROM C COMPREENSIVE E PLAN a TH MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND Scale 1-.400' ZONE CHANGE FROM C-P TO R-25 FEET A REFER TO STAFF REPORT 0 400 8 0 0 imin TIGARD CITY LIMITS M\GISOA1\1 GCOVV1B.3DWOVUYCPA.DWG 3/u/211 ■ ___.., . , . . _L____,,,,___ _ -- I ff7........... a ., , -- - - SPRU( I �►(11/ /111111111 G 1111 . E•1: ■i■ . fit. Ai d imeL,..: . , Ill= ALII SIM 1 ���/1111►`� ) . -114.4 `1 id I MI III 1144 q•• a.LIJ lk . v iiiiiim 1 _ imilli .4. CI 11111 z MI � � z "P. ST MI iiii - 111111■ '' ,i.:÷:FizZial CL MI IX I Mi. =kr 110 0.7 . - . ..., ti Ai" I iii_. i_. .. •, * . oit . ,4 10 .111 MN= o if a) ilk �. - >I.Xill r Oik 4. e 1 ® I' :::. PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN P Al 14 8 i OAL 0 ---. III.imi- :441101 - ..iil. 0 , VICINITY E X H I I� MAP MED UMEHIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND ZONE CHANGE FROM R-4.5 TO R-25 % �CHANGE EFROM CP PETO SIVE PLAN NO•TH MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND Sole V.400' ZONE CHANGE FROM C-P TO R-25 FEET A REFER TO STAFF REPORT 0 400 800 TIGARD CITY LIMITS ' -- -------- - - - - _ WRIIIDATTKiCOVVB80WQWAYOPAAWO a/w/M , • AGENDA ITEM # For Agenda of May 30, 1995 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Chancre CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 ,,� PREPARED BY:--Ray Valone DEPT HEAD OK VLF' v/ CITY ADMIN OK 1/1 `�' ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Should the City Council approve a comprehensive plan map amendment and zone change on four parcels of land, including two parcels from Low Density Residential/R-4.5 to Medium-High Density Residential/R-25 and two parcels from C-P/C-P to Medium-High Density Residential/R-25 . STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Zone Change CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002. INFORMATION SUMMARY The proposed plan amendment and zone change concerns four parcels of land located south of SW Pfaffle Street near the SW 83rd Avenue intersection. The applicant, Andrews Management, has requested this action in order to facilitate development of multi-family housing. The Planning Commission recommended approval of CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 at its hearing of April 17, 1995. The proposed ordinance, final order and vicinity map for CPA 94-0006 are attached. The applicant's submittals consist of a written narrative and transportation impact analysis. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Deny the comprehensive plan amendment and zone change. FISCAL NOTES No direct fiscal impact to the city. .. • • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 95- AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE REQUESTED BY ANDREWS MANAGEMENT (CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002) . WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a comprehensive plan map amendment and zone change from Low Density Residential/R4. 5 to Medium-High Density Residential/R-25 on two parcels (1S1 36CC, lots 300 and 400) and from C-P (Commercial Professional) /C-P to Medium-High Density Residential/R- 25 on two parcels (1S1 36CC, lots 200 and 2200) ; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for the proposed amendment and zone change at its meeting of April 17, 1995, and recommends approval of CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 . THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The proposed amendment is consistent with all relevant criteria based upon the facts, findings and conclusions noted in the attached final order (Exhibit A) ; SECTION 2 : The City Council concurs with the Planning Commission and staff recommendations and approves the request to designate the parcels illustrated on the attached map (Exhibit B) . SECTION 3 : This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of , 1995. Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of 1995. James Nicoli, Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney Date ORDINANCE No. 95- Page 1 • EXHIBIT A CITY OF TIGARD CITY COUNCIL FINAL ORDER A FINAL ORDER INCLUDING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS WITH REGARD TO AN APPLICATION FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE REQUESTED BY ANDREWS MANAGEMENT. The Tigard City Council reviewed the application below at a public hearing on May 30, 1995. The City Council approves the request. The Council has based its decision on the facts, findings and conclusions noted below. A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 95-0001 Zone Change ZON 95-0002 REQUEST: Amend the Comprehensive Plan map from C-P (Commercial Professional) and Low Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential and change the zoning from C-P and R-4 . 5 to R-25. APPLICANT: Andrews Management 4000 SW Kruse Way Place Building 1, Suite 270 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 OWNERS: Arthur & Margaret Verharen Paul & Anna Herberholz 12435 SW 60th 8400 SW Pfaffle Street Portland, OR 97219 Tigard, OR 97223 McGuire, Robert/William/ ODOT James and Thomas Region 1/Property Mgmt Dowell, Sarah 5320 SW Macadam 8470 SW Pfaffle Street Portland, OR 97201 Tigard, OR 97223 REPRESENTATIVE: Spencer Vail, Planning Consultant 4505 NE 24th Avenue Portland, OR 97211 LOCATION: South of SW Pfaffle Street at SW 83rd Avenue (WCTM 1S1 36CC, lots 200, 300, 400 and 2200) 2 . Vicinity The four affected parcels, containing 5. 51 acres, are located 1 • • along SW Pfaffle Street, north of Pacific Highway and east of SW Hall Boulevard (see map, Exhibit B) . The properties to the north across SW Pfaffle Street are designated as Low and Medium Density Residential with a- zoning of R-4 .5, R-7 and R- 12 ; to the east are properties zoned C-P and include the General Motors Training Center and some vacant parcels; to the south is Highway 217; and to the west are three small parcels zoned C-P which include a cellular telephone monopole and a single family house. 3 . Background Information Parcels A and B were annexed to the city and zoned R-4 . 5 in 1987 as part of the south Metzger annexation. Parcel C was annexed to the city in 1969 by the present owners. Parcel D, owned by ODOT, is within the original area of incorporation of the city. Parcels C and D are zoned C-P. No development applications have been reviewed for any of the four parcels. The Planning Commission held a hearing on this proposal on April 17, 1995, and unanimously recommends approval. 4 . Site Information and Proposal Description The triangular site of 5. 51 acres is comprised of four parcels. Parcels A and B front on SW Pfaffle Street and have single family houses on them. Parcel C fronts on SW Pfaffle Street and is vacant. Parcel D is vacant and has no roadway access. All of the parcels are relatively flat but are situated approximately 20 feet above Highway 217 along their southern boundary. The applicant requests a comprehensive plan map amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential and from C-P (Commercial Professional) to Medium-High Density Residential; and a zone change from R-4 .5 to R-25 and from C-P to R-25 on the four properties as follows (see map) : • Low Density Residential/R-4. 5 to Medium-High Density Residential/R-25: - Parcel A: WCTM 1S1 36CC, lot 400 (0.82 acres) - Parcel B: WCTM 1S1 36CC, lot 300 (1. 25 acres) • C-P (Commercial Professional) /C-P to Medium-High Density Residential/R-25: - Parcel C: WCTM 1S1 36CC, lot 200 (2 . 55 acres) - Parcel D: WCTM 1S1 36CC, lot 2200 (0. 89 acres) A written document, transportation analysis and preliminary site plan have been submitted by the applicant. The written document and analysis are included as part of this staff report. The site plan was submitted as an example of what 2 • could be done on the site. Because the proposed action is a land use change and not a development application, the site plan is not part of this report, though it will be entered into the record as being part of the application. 5. Agency Comments The Engineering and Building divisions, Police Department and the Unified Sewerage Agency have reviewed the proposal and have no objections. No other comments were received at the time of this report. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Comprehensive Plan policies 2 . 1. 1, 6. 1. 1, 8. 1. 1, 8.2 . 2 , and 12. 1. 3; Community Development Code chapters 18. 22 , 18. 32 and 18.56; and Oregon Administrative Rule 660-12-060. 1. Policy 2 . 1. 1 states that the city shall maintain an ongoing citizen involvement program and shall assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process. The policy is satisfied because the surrounding property owners were given notice of public hearings related to the proposal and given the opportunity to comment on the proposal. The notices of hearings were also posted at Tigard City Hall and advertised in a local newpaper. In addition, the applicant provided notice of and conducted a meeting on January 13 , 1995, for interested property owners within a 250-foot radius of the affected properties. 2 . Policy 6. 1. 1 states that the city shall provide an opportunity for a diversity of housing densities and residential types at various prices and rent levels. The designation of the affected properties to Medium-High Density Residential and R- 25 will allow for the potential development of 137. units of housing. This change would contribute to a diversity of housing opportunities for the city. If approved, the proposal would also increase the housing opportunity index from 10. 38 to 10.44 units per acre, thus helping to implement the Metropolitan Housing Rule by increasing the residential density in the city. 3 . Policy 8. 1. 1 states that the city shall plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. The transportation impact analysis conducted by Kittelson and Associates, Inc. concludes that all the intersections studied along SW Pfaffle Street will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service during all time periods with full build out under the proposed zoning. Although forced-flow conditions created by traffic backed up from the SW 3 • • Dartmouth/Highway 99W intersection currently occur during the peak hour periods at the SW 78th Avenue/SW Pfaffle Street intersection, the proposed zoning change would have minimal impacts on this already-existing condition. The study found that the proposed zoning would result in 480 fewer trips on the transportation system than if the site was fully developed under the current zoning. 4. Policy 8. 2 .2, states, in part, that the city shall encourage the expansion and use of public transit by locating land intensive uses in close proximity to transitways. Tri-met offers bus service on Highway 99W and SW Hall Boulevard. The policy is satisfied, _ therefore, because the proposed redesignation would locate an intensive residential use within one quarter mile of a transit corridor. 5. Policy 12 . 1. 3 lists the locational criteria for designating land as medium-high and high density residential on the plan map. The locational criteria can be construed in a flexible manner in the interest of accommodating proposals which are found to be in the public interest and capable of integration into the community. The burden of proving conformance with the criteria varies with the degree of change and impact on the community. The applicable locational criteria with findings are as follows: a. Areas which are not committed to low density development. Although Parcels A and B are currently zoned R-4 .5 and have single family houses on them, the area is not committed to low density development. The parcels were annexed to the city as part of the south Metzger area in 1987. They were the only annexed parcels located south of SW Pfaffle Street and were assigned an R-4 . 5 zoning along with all the properties north of the street. This was done despite the fact that the two-parcel area had C-P zoning on each side and Highway 217 along the southern border. Parcels C and D have always been zoned for commercial uses. b. Areas which can be buffered from low density residential areas in order to maximize the privacy of established low density residential areas. The proposed area can be adequately buffered from the low density residential area on the north side of SW Pfaffle Street through the density transition, buffering and screening requirements of the Community Development Code. These requirements would be met during subdivision review when an application is submitted to the city. c. Areas which have direct access from a major collector or arterial street. The proposed area is not located on a major collector or arterial street. SW Pfaffle Street is 4 • • classified as a minor collector by the city. The property is located, however, within 250 feet of SW Hall Boulevard, which is an arterial street. The Kittelson analysis indicates that the amount of traffic that would be generated by the proposed plan amendment and zone change area, even if developed to the maximum allowable density, would be less than under the current zoning designations. Less traffic will mean less impact to the existing residential development north of SW Pfaffle Street. In addition, the proposed change to residential land use on the four parcels would be more in keeping with the residential character along this portion of SW Pfaffle Street than would commercial office land use. For these reasons, strict adherence to this criterion is not warranted in this case. d. Areas which are not subiect to development limitations. There are no known development limitations on the proposed site. Detailed review of the site characteristics would be undertaken at the time of development application. e. Areas where the existing facilities have the capacity for additional development. The existing facilities and services have adequate capacity to accommodate additional development. The sanitary sewer, storm and water lines located along SW Pfaffle Street are capable of handling development allowed under the proposed changes. According to the traffic report, SW Pfaffle Street will operate at acceptable levels of service. Existing police and fire services are available and adequate for the site area. f. Areas within one-quarter mile of public transit. Public transit is available on Pacific Highway and SW Hall Boulevard, which are within one-quarter mile of the site. g. Areas within one-quarter mile from neighborhood and general commercial shopping centers or business and office centers. Within one-quarter mile of the site is the Tigard Plaza on SW Hall and the Pacific Highway corridor with access to shopping and business/office centers. h. Areas adjacent to either private or public permanent.open space. There is no private or public permanent open space areas adjacent to the site. Despite this fact, the proposed plan amendment and zone change is in the public interest and is capable of harmonious integration into the community. The site would provide the capability of developing higher density, diverse housing along a 5 • • transportation corridor within an established urban area. Furthermore, the flexibility of this criterion is noted where other R-25 zoned areas exist in the city without adjacent open space. For these reasons, strict adherence to this criterion is not warranted in this case. 6. Section 18.32 of the Community Development Code sets forth the procedural requirements for review of quasi-judicial plan amendments. The application has been processed in accordance with code sections 18. 32.020, 18. 32 . 050 and 18 . 32 . 060; hearings have been conducted by the planning commission and city council according to 18. 32 .090 (D) and (E) ; and the requirements for notification of the hearing have been met according to 18. 32 . 130 and 18. 32 . 140. 7. Section 18.22 of the Community Development Code sets forth standards and procedures for quasi-judicial amendments to the plan and zoning district map as follows: A. A recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application for a quasi-judicial amendment shall be based on all of the following standards: 1. The applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designation and; the change will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the community. The applicable plan policies related to the proposal are reviewed above under section B (Findings and Conclusions) . 2 . The statewide planning goals adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197, until acknowledgement of the comprehensive plan and ordinances. The Tigard Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged, therefore specific review of each statewide planning goal is not applicable. Notice of filing this proposed amendment has been provided to the Department of Land Conservation and Development for comment at least 45 days prior to the final decision date. 3 . The applicable standards of any provision of this code or other applicable implementing ordinance. Code section • 18.56 (Multiple-Family Residential) contains the standards for the R-25 zone. The proposed site could meet the standards listed under "dimensional requirements" and "additional requirements" for a development. Specific future site development improvements will be reviewed through the subdivision and/or site development review procedures to ensure consistency with this section' s standards. 6 • • 4 . Evidence of change in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to the property which is the subject of the development application. This criterion is met because there is evidence that a mistake was made in the designations of the comprehensive plan and zoning maps regarding the affected properties. Parcels A and B were annexed to the city in 1987 as part of the south Metzger area annexation. They were designated as Low Density Residential and zoned R-4.5 along with the properties north of SW Pfaffle Street and east of SW 83rd Avenue to comply with the Urban Planning Area Agreement (UPAA) with the county. At the time of annexation, the parcels were zoned Washington County R-5. However, it could be argued that a mistake was made at the time of designation since they were the only annexed parcels located south of SW Pfaffle Street, and the only ones zoned for residential land use. Furthermore, at the time of annexation the parcels were, and still are, bordered on the north by medium density residential, on the east and west by C-P zoned property and on the south by Highway 217. This area is not, therefore, committed to low density residential. The UPAA did allow for an exception to the zoning requirement if the city and county agreed at the time of annexation that the county designation was outdated. Given their location within a commercial and higher density area, the zoning on the two parcels was outdated at the time of annexation. Parcels C and D are zoned C-P. Parcel C was annexed to the city in 1969 and has remained vacant. Parcel D, currently owned by ODOT, has been part of the city since its incorporation and has remained vacant as well. Access to Parcel C is via SW Pfaffle Street only. This parcel has very limited visibility for a commercial land use due to its location and elevation above Highway 217. Parcel D has no direct access to a street. It is a triangular-shaped parcel that is land-locked by Parcel C to the north, the GM Training Center to the east and the Highway 217 north bound on-ramp to the south. The fact that no commercial development has been proposed on these parcels since the C-P zone was established may very well reflect their location and orientation. Due to the preceding evidence, the planning staff concurs with the applicant and concludes that mistakes and/or inconsistencies were made in the comprehensive plan and zoning maps regarding the affected four parcels. 8. Chapter 12, Section 060 of the Transportation Planning Rule requires that amendments to comprehensive plans which significantly affect a transportation facility shall assure 7 • • that allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity and level of service of the facility. An amendment significantly affects a facility if it changes the functional classification of an existing or planned facility, changes standards implementing a classification system, allows land uses which would result in levels of service which are inconsistent with the classification, or reduces the level of service of the facility below the minimum acceptable level. This criterion is met for the following reasons. The amendment and zone change would not change the functional classification of SW Pfaffle Street or SW Hall Boulevard; the proposed residential land use is not inconsistent with the functional classification of the street system in the area; and the traffic level of service generated by the proposal would not reduce the street system below the minimum level. The traffic consultant report found that the SW Hall/SW Pfaffle intersection will operate at an acceptable level of service during both the weekday AM and PM peak hours, and that potential development under the proposed change would result in 480 fewer trips than development under the current zoning. C. DECISION The City Council approves the requested comprehensive plan amendment and zone change to designate the following properties as Medium-High Density Residential on the comprehensive plan map and R-25 on the zoning map: WCTM 1S1 36CC, lots 200, 300, 400 and 2200 The Council finds that the change will promote the general welfare of the city and will not be significantly detrimental and injurious to surrounding land uses. 8 • • , BX13IBIT B 4 ` RUC �ma� m L I I I I 1 1 1.111111 111 ■ 11111111111 .11111111111 P ■ iir gr ■ ri pm III F � NeA� �� _ . e ` •_ � `f141 Ilia I 11111111111111111 11111111711 All III 11111AIII 4111 SV. mil • UJ MIIIM 01 iliwUNI� ■ MIME —�- z (5 Mill Blitilit,. ■ 111 --- z ST z °V aliktn. ::::::A.I.fi:::ii::: ::§ • III i •1111111 16, MO I. • , r .1 „.::::,,......,..::: ...,..,..::::::...:::::, ".:.:.:::.::.:.::.:::: ........:,: 7.:::::z _.: ....., # . In ja CC 11.1 0 0 $ "!/ 9'N ii- ig I I'M 0 cre 00,.* * i kik, -8 ,41117, r • 0 _ ♦ ir_1914 •11 ri ,... (...) VICINITY EXHIBIT MAP •••••••"" PROPOSED F COMPREHENSIVE PLAN "" CHANGE FROM LOW DENSITY TO MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ANO /�\ ZONE CHANGE FROM R-4.5 TO R-25 / . A CHANGE PROPOSED C PETO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN NO-TH MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND Seale 1.400' ZONE CHANGE FROM C-P TO R-25 FEET A REFER TO STAFF REPORT 0 4.0 0 800 TIGARD CITY LIMITS 14\GSOAT\TIGCOV\Na3OWGVUYCPA.DWG 3/14/95 • • CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION av Regular Meeting Minutes April 17, 1995 1. CALL TO ORDER President Fyre called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The meeting was held in the Tigard Civic Center, Town Hall, at 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: President Fyre; Commissioners DeFrang, Griffith, Holland, Moore, Scolar, and Wilson • Commissioners Absent: Commissioners Col[son and Saxton Staff Present: Senior Planner, Dick Bewersdorff; Assistant Planner Will D'Andrea; Assistant Planner Ray Valone; Planning Commission Secretary Jerree Gaynor 3. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES Commissioner Holland moved and Commissioner DeFrang seconded a motion to approve the April 3, 1995, meeting minutes as submitted. A voice vote was taken and the motion passed. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS None at this time 5. PUBLIC HEARING CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT REQUEST: Amend the Comprehensive Plan map from C-P (Commercial Professional) and Low Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential and change the zoning from C-P and R-4.5 to R-25. LOCATION: South of SW Pfaffle Street at SW 83rd Avenue (WCTM 1S1 36CC, lots 200, 300, 400 and 2200). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: The relevant criteria in this case are Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, 6.1.1, 8.1.1, 8.2.2, and 12.1.3; and Community Development Code chapters 18.22, 18.32 and 18.56. STAFF REPORT Assistant Planner Ray Valone reported to the commission on this proposal to amend the comprehensive plan map and rezone 5.51 acres to medium- high density residential. He stated that 4 parcels of land were involved; 2 parcels are currently zoned low density residential 4.5 with single family PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - April 17, 1995 -Page 1 • • houses on them. The other 2 parcels are zoned commercial professional and are both vacant. p Valone stated that responses received from Engineering, Building, Police, and Unified Sewerage Agency contained no objections to the proposal. He said that ODOT had sent a letter stating they did not oppose the zone change, but did have some concerns about traffic. ODOT did acknowledge that at buildout under the proposal, there will be fewer trips generated than under the current zoning. Valone stated that the proposal meets all applicable comprehensive plan and development code criteria. He said that the proposal will generate fewer traffic trips and will contribute to the city's housing opportunity goal. He said that staff recommends the planning commission forward a recommendation for approval to city council. In response to a question from Commissioner Holland, Valone stated that Pfaff le Street is a minor collector. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Spencer Vail,4505 NE 24th Ave., Portland,OR 97211,representing Andrews Management spoke to the commission. He stated that the applicant agreed with the staff conclusions and findings of this proposal. He referred to a transportation impact analysis prepared by Kittleson &Associates. The report indicated that, at full buildout, the traffic would be less than if it would be if the property were to remain at its present zoning designation. Commissioner Griffith asked Mr. Vail about the timeline for buildout on and which streets would be impacted by traffic. Commissioner DeFrang commented on the bad intersection at corner of Hall and Pfaffle. Commissioner Moore asked who would determine and who would be responsible for a traffic signal at this intersection. Dick Bewersdorff said that it is possible a traffic signal could become a condition of the development. CITIZEN INPUT Paul Brossia, 11260 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223, stated that he was not opposed to the zone change and he is in favor of increased density, but he is concerned about the increase in traffic on Pfaffie Street and possible accidents at the intersection of Pfaffie and Hall. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Commissioner Griffith moved to recommend to council that they accept the proposal. Commissioner Holland seconded the motion. A voice vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - April 17, 1995 -Page 2 • • 5.2 TUP 95-0001 NORTHWEST LANDSCAPING REQUEST: Applicant requests Temporary Use approval for the placement and temporary use of three modular offices. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.140, 18.70. LOCATION: 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road (WCTM 2S1 13AB,tax lots 300,400 and 500), (WCTM 2S1 12DC,tax lots 1100 and 1200). North of SW Durham Road, south of 72nd Avenue, and east of SW Upper Boones Ferry Road. ZONE: I-L (Light Industrial) The Light Industrial zoning allows public support facilities, parking facilities, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing,wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. STAFF REPORT Assistant Planner Will D'Andrea reported that, due to the temporary nature of the application versus the permanent status of the easement and that there will be no new employees, the Planning Division is willing to drop the condition of requiring an easement. In response to Commissioner Griffith, Dick Bewersdorff stated that the temporary use, in this case, is for one year. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Steve Morasch from Schwabe, Williamson, and Wyatt, Pacwest Center, Suites 1600-1800, 1211 SW Fifth Ave., Portland, OR 97204-3795, spoke for the applicant. He said that he agrees with staff. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Commissioner Holland moved to uphold the applicant's appeal of TUP 95- 0001. Commissioner Wilson seconded the motion. A voice vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously. 5.3 ZOA 95-0001 BOWEN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY REQUEST: A request by Bowen Development Company to amend the following Tigard Community Development Code Sections in order to permit attached, common wall town homes on 'fee' simple ownership lots: 18.26.030(B)(4), 18.26.030(B)(5), 18.26.030(C)(3), 18.26.030-Compatibility Matrix, 18.80.080(A)(c)(i), 18.80.120(3)(j). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.32.120. LOCATION: City wide.5.1 STAFF REPORT Assistant Planner Will D'Andrea explained that this request was to modify sections of the community development code to allow attached common wall town homes. The current code allows for two single family, common wall attached units on two separate properties. The proposed amendments would allow for more than two units. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - April 17, 1995 -Page 3 • • D'Andrea said that the minimum lot sizes and density would be the same as the underlying zone. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Mike Robinson, 900 SW Fifth, suite 2300, Portland, OR 97209, spoke on behalf of the applicant. He outlined the proposal and what the applicant hoped to accomplish. He pointed out that it would not increase the density or change any of the uses; it would primarily affect districts with planned development overlays. Robert Moreland, 1022 SW Salmon, Portland, OR 97201, responded to a question from Commissioner Wilson about reduced garage setbacks. He emphasized the importance of not reducing the density that could be achieved and not diminishing the flexibility of grouping the houses. He stated that extra parking could possibly be obtained in a common parking lot. President Fyre remarked that the 8' setback would apply to a private drive, not a public street. The setback from a public street would be 20 feet. Senior Planner Dick Bewersdorff said that when the development was submitted for site design review, the parking could be evaluated. OPPOSITION Robert Bledsoe, 11800 SW Walnut,Tigard,OR 97223,expressed his concerns about allowing this type of development in an R-4.5 area. He suggested using the 'townhouse' definition of the code to allow row houses in higher density zoned areas. Discussion followed on density transfers and the clustering of houses in an R-4.5 zone. Assistant Planner D'Andrea explained that the houses would be closer together, but the overall density would not changed. Senior Planner Bewersdorff said that in this case there would be more open space. APPLICANT'S REBUTTAL Mike Robinson maintained that people would not be able to do this type of development in any zone without a planned development overlay. He also remarked that applicants for duplexes or single family attached houses must seek conditional use approval from the planning commission. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED After some discussion, Commissioner Moore moved to forward a recommendation to city council to approve ZOA 95-0001. Commissioner Holland seconded the motion. The motion was carried by majority vote. Commissioner Wilson abstained. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - April 17, 1995 -Page 4 • S 6. OTHER BUSINESS None at this time 7. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:32 p.m. Jeyree Gaynor, Pfanr iing do-mmission Secretary i✓ / / A Pres P r it•: Fyre PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - April 17, 1995 -Page 5 • i STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM 5 . 1 April 17, 1995 TIGARD CITY HALL - TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OREGON A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 95-0001 Zone Change ZON 95-0002 REQUEST: Amend the Comprehensive Plan map from C-P (Commercial Professional) and Low Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential and change the zoning from C-P and R-4. 5 to R-25 APPLICANT: Andrews Management 4000 SW Kruse Way Place Building 1, Suite 270 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 OWNERS: Arthur & Margaret Verharen Paul & Anna Herberholz 12435 SW 60th 8400 SW Pfaffle Street Portland, OR 97219 Tigard, OR 97223 McGuire, Robert/William/ ODOT James and Thomas Region 1/Property Mgmt Dowell, Sarah 5320 SW Macadam 8470 SW Pfaffle Street Portland, OR 97201 Tigard, OR 97223 REPRESENTATIVE: Spencer Vail, Planning Consultant 4505 NE 24th Avenue Portland, OR 97211 LOCATION: South of SW Pfaffle Street at SW' 83rd Avenue (WCTM 1S1 36CC, lots 200, 300, 400 and 2200) 2 . Vicinity The four affected parcels, containing 5. 51 acres, are located along SW Pfaffle Street, north of Pacific Highway and east of SW Hall Boulevard (see map, Exhibit A) . The properties to the north across SW Pfaffle Street are designated as Low and Medium Density Residential with a zoning of R-4 .5, R-7 and R- 12 ; to the east are properties zoned C-P and include the General Motors Training Center and some vacant parcels; to the 1 • • 's> • south is Highway 217; and to the west are three small parcels zoned C-P which include a cellular telephone monopole and a single family house. 3 . Background Information Parcels A and B were annexed to the city and zoned R-4.5 in 1987 as part of the south Metzger annexation. Parcel C was annexed to the city in 1969 by the present owners. Parcel D, owned by ODOT, is within the original area of incorporation of the city. Parcels C and D are zoned C-P. No development applications have been reviewed for any of the four parcels. 4. Site Information and Proposal Description The triangular site of 5.51 acres is comprised of four parcels. Parcels A and B front on SW Pfaffle Street and have ' single family houses on them. Parcel C fronts on SW Pfaffle Street and is vacant. Parcel D is vacant and has no roadway access. All of the parcels are relatively flat but are situated approximately 20 feet above Highway 217 along their southern boundary. The applicant requests a comprehensive plan map amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential and from C-P (Commercial Professional) to Medium-High Density Residential; and a zone change from R-4 .5 to R-25 and from C-P to R-25 on the four properties as follows (see map) : . • Low Density Residential/R-4.5 to Medium-High Density Residential/R-25: - Parcel A: WCTM 1S1 36CC, lot 400 (0.82 acres) - Parcel B: WCTM 1S1 36CC, lot 300 (1.25 acres) • C-P (Commercial Professional) /C-P to Medium-High Density Residential/R-25: - Parcel C: WCTM 1S1 36CC, lot 200 (2 .55 acres) - Parcel D: WCTM 1S1 36CC, lot 2200 (0. 89 acres) A written document, transportation analysis and preliminary site plan have been submitted by the applicant. The written document and analysis are included as part of this staff report. The site plan was submitted as an example of what could be done on the site. Because the proposed action is a land use change and not a development application, the site plan is not part of this report, though it will be entered into the record as being part of the application. 5. Agency Comments The Engineering and Building divisions, Police Department and the Unified Sewerage Agency have reviewed the proposal and 2 • • have no objections. No other comments were received at the time of this report. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Comprehensive Plan policies 2. 1.1, 6.1.1, 8.1. 1, 8.2.2, and 12.1.3; and Community Development Code chapters 18.22, 18.32 and 18.56. 1. Policy 2. 1. 1 states that the city shall maintain an ongoing citizen involvement program and shall assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process. The policy is satisfied because the surrounding property owners were given notice of public hearings related to the proposal and given the opportunity to . comment on the proposal. The notices of hearings were also posted at Tigard City Hall and advertised in a local newpaper. In addition, the applicant provided notice of and conducted a meeting on January 13, 1995, for interested property owners within a 250-foot radius of the affected properties. 2 . Policy 6. 1. 1 states that the city shall provide an opportunity for a diversity of housing densities and residential types at various prices and rent levels. The designation of the affected properties to Medium-High Density Residential and R- 25 will allow for the potential development of 137 units of housing. This change would contribute to a diversity of housing opportunities for the city. If approved, the proposal would also increase the housing opportunity index from 10. 38 to 10.44 units per acre, thus helping to implement the Metropolitan Housing Rule by increasing the residential density in the city. 3 . Policy 8 . 1. 1 states that the city shall plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. The transportation impact analysis conducted by Kittelson and Associates, Inc. concludes that all the intersections studied along SW Pfaffle Street will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service during all time periods with full build out under the proposed zoning. Although forced-flow conditions created by traffic backed up from the SW Dartmouth/Highway 99W intersection currently occur during the peak hour periods at the SW 78th Avenue/SW Pfaffle Street intersection, the proposed zoning change would have minimal impacts on this already-existing condition. The study found that the proposed zoning would result in 480 fewer trips on the transportation system than if the site was fully developed under the current zoning. 4 . Policy 12 . 1. 3 lists the locational criteria for designating land as medium-high and high density residential on the plan 3 • • • map. The locational criteria can be construed in a flexible . manner in the interest of accommodating proposals which are found to be in the public interest and capable of integration into the community. The burden of proving conformance with the criteria varies with the degree of change and impact on the community. The applicable locational criteria with findings are as follows: a. Areas which are not committed to low density development. Although Parcels A and B are currently zoned R-4.5 and have single family houses on them, the area is not committed to low density development. The parcels were annexed to the city as part of the south Metzger area in 1987. They were the only annexed parcels located south of SW Pfaffle Street and were assigned an R-4. 5 zoning along with all the properties north of the street. This was done despite the fact that the two-parcel area had C-P zoning on each side and Highway 217 along the southern border. Parcels C and D have always been zoned for commercial uses. b. Areas which can be buffered from low density residential areas in order to maximize the privacy of established low density residential areas. The proposed area can be adequately buffered from the low density residential area on the north side of SW Pfaffle Street through the density transition, buffering and screening requirements of the Community Development Code. These requirements would be met during subdivision review when an application is submitted to the city. c. Areas which have direct access from a major collector or arterial street. The proposed area is not located on a major collector or arterial street. SW Pfaffle Street is classified as a minor collector by the city. The property is located, however, within 250 feet of SW Hall Boulevard, which is an arterial street. The Kittelson analysis indicates that the amount. of traffic that would be generated by the proposed plan amendment and zone change area, even if developed to the maximum allowable density, would be less than under the current zoning designations. Less traffic will mean less impact to the existing residential development north of SW Pfaffle Street. In addition, the proposed change to residential land use on the four parcels would be more in keeping with the residential character along this portion of SW • Pfaffle Street than would commercial office land use. For these reasons, strict adherence to this criterion is not warranted in this case. d. Areas which are not subject to development limitations. There are no known development limitations on the 4 • • proposed site. Detailed review of the site characteristics would be undertaken at the time of development application. e. Areas where the existing facilities have the capacity for additional development. The existing facilities and services have adequate capacity to accommodate additional development. The sanitary sewer, storm and water lines located along SW Pfaffle Street are capable of handling development allowed under the proposed changes. According to the traffic report, SW Pfaffle Street will operate at acceptable levels of service.. Existing police and fire services are available and adequate for the site area. f. Areas within one-quarter mile of public transit. Public transit is available on Pacific Highway and SW Hall Boulevard, which are within one-quarter mile of the site. g. Areas within one-quarter mile from neighborhood and general commercial shopping centers or business and office centers. Within one-quarter mile of the site is the Tigard Plaza on SW Hall and the Pacific Highway corridor with access to shopping and business/office centers. h. Areas adjacent to either private or public permanent open space. There is no private or public permanent open space areas adjacent to the site. Despite this fact, the proposed plan amendment and zone change is in the public interest and is capable of harmonious integration into • the community. The site would provide the capability of developing higher density, diverse housing along a transportation corridor within an established urban area. Furthermore, the flexibility of this criterion is noted where other R-25 zoned areas exist in the city without adjacent open space. For these reasons, strict adherence to this criterion is not warranted in this case. 5. Section 18. 32 of the Community Development Code sets forth the procedural requirements for review of quasi-judicial plan amendments. The application has been processed in accordance with code sections 18.32. 020, 18. 32 . 050 and 18. 32 . 060; the Planning Commission has conducted hearings according to 18 .32 . 090 (D) ; and the requirements for notification of the hearing has been met according to 18. 32 . 130 and 18. 32 . 140. 6. Section 18. 22 of the Community Development Code sets forth standards and procedures for quasi-judicial plan amendments to the zoning district map as follows: 5 • • • A. A recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application for a quasi-judicial amendment shall be based on all of the following standards: 1. The applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designation and; the change will not adversely affect the health. safety and welfare of the community. The applicable plan policies related to the proposal are reviewed above under section B (Findings and Conclusions) . 2 . The statewide planning goals adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197, until acknowledgement of the comprehensive plan and ordinances. The Tigard Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged, therefore specific review of each statewide planning goal is not applicable. Notice of filing this proposed amendment has • been provided to the Department of Land Conservation and Development for comment at least 45 days prior to the final decision date. 3 . The applicable standards of any provision of this code or other applicable implementing ordinance. Code section 18. 56 (Multiple-Family Residential) contains the standards for the R-25 zone. The proposed site could meet the standards listed under "dimensional requirements" and "additional requirements" for a development. Specific future site development improvements will be reviewed through the subdivision and/or site development review procedures to ensure consistency with this section's standards. 4 . Evidence of change in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to the property which is the subject of the development application. This criterion is met because there is evidence that a mistake was made in the designations of the comprehensive plan and zoning maps regarding the affected properties. Parcels A and B were annexed to the city in 1987 as part of the south • Metzger area annexation. They were designated as Low Density Residential and zoned R-4.5 along with the properties north of SW Pfaffle Street and east of SW 83rd Avenue to comply with the Urban Planning Area Agreement (UPAA) with the county. At the time of annexation, the parcels were zoned Washington County R-5. However, it could be argued that a mistake was made at the time of designation since they were the only annexed parcels located south of SW Pfaffle Street, and the only ones zoned for residential land use. Furthermore, at the time of annexation the parcels were, and still are, bordered 6 • . • on the north by medium density residential, on the east and west by C-P zoned property and on the south by Highway 217. This area is not, therefore, committed to low density residential. The UPAA did allow for an • exception to the zoning requirement if the city and county agreed at the time of annexation that the county designation was outdated. Given their location within a commercial and higher density area, the zoning on the two parcels was outdated at the time of annexation. Parcels C and D are zoned C-P. Parcel C was annexed to the city in 1969 and has remained vacant. Parcel D, currently owned by ODOT, has been part of the city since its incorporation and has remained vacant as well. Access to Parcel C is via SW Pfaffle Street only. This parcel has very limited visibility for a commercial land use due to its location and elevation above Highway 217. Parcel D has no direct access to a street. It is a triangular-shaped parcel that is land-locked by Parcel C to the north, the GM Training Center to the east and the Highway 217 north bound on-ramp to the south. The fact that no commercial development has been proposed on these parcels since the C-P zone was established may very well reflect their location and orientation. Due to the preceding evidence, the planning staff concurs with the applicant and concludes that mistakes and/or inconsistencies were made in the comprehensive plan and zoning maps regarding the affected four parcels. C. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation to the City Council for APPROVAL of Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 95-0001 and Zone Change ZON 95-0002 based upon the foregoing findings. 7 ■ • • I I I m - SPRUCI LI ] l 1 ■ ..�11w�1�1�11 THORN ST , ���i S �, ,�,��VII < Ai Iv .. .:. _, II , i 1 1 = 16.10111111 a A „a, 1411111111 MI I IMO MN 11111111111111111 am III tarn RN 1 1� a }-, 1-. I ■'_=■■1 �I W "''`� i AMINE. MO z a iiIIhiIinn z ZIcc ill■ Iff*NR:t.tf4...3-1:7:4:' /* PF. 1--r IP 1111,111111011111111111111 -.I Ca CC MI NE IN ir: . 1 Ih. r ___..... v....._„:7;:,....:. _7..4. ...,..,.,;:z„..... .:.z.......... „....,... _,.., _:. .., 111 _______. OtO* - 90 4 M y Al C...1 11 In IIMI Li- No 10.t IlIll MI 0 ai ** * 7 ,. IIIIIIt Illr gm . 1111 fn .0 *V 0 'r\P". iiii . . . PH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN VI •••••••:"• CHA NGE F ROM LOW DENSITY TO MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND , ZONE CHANGE FROM R-1.5 TO R-25 �I. �CHANGE PROPOSED FROM C PETO SIVE PLAN NO-TH MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND Scala 1'.400' ZONE CHANGE FROM C-P TO R-25 FEET A REFER TO STAFF REPORT 0 400 800 TIGARD CITY LIMITS MAG180ATNnGCOV\I OWITRAYCPA-DWO 3/14/14 • • ADDENDUM STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM 5. 1 April 17, 1995 Case: CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 The following paragraph should be included under section B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS of the staff report: 4. Policy 8.2.2, states, in part, that the city shall encourage the expansion and use of public transit by locating land intensive uses in close proximity to transitways. Tri-met offers bus service on Highway 99W and SW Hall Boulevard. The policy is satisfied, therefore, because the proposed redesignation would locate an intensive residential use within one quarter mile of a transit corridor. 111 411 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM April 17, 1995 TIGARD CITY HALL - TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OREGON A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 95-0001 Zone Change ZON 95-0002 REQUEST: Amend the Comprehensive Plan map from C-P (Commercial Professional) and Low Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential and change the zoning from C-P and R-4 . 5 to R-25 APPLICANT: Andrews Management 4000 SW Kruse Way Place Building 1, Suite 270 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 OWNERS: Arthur & Margaret Verharen Paul & Anna Herberholz 12435 SW 60th 8400 SW Pfaffle Street Portland, OR 97219 Tigard, OR 97223 McGuire, Robert/William/ ODOT James and Thomas Region 1/Property Mgmt Dowell, Sarah 5320 SW Macadam 8470 SW Pfaffle Street Portland, OR 97201 Tigard, OR 97223 REPRESENTATIVE: Spencer Vail, Planning Consultant 4505 NE 24th Avenue Portland, OR 97211 LOCATION: South of SW Pfaffle Street at SW 83rd Avenue (WCTM 1S1 36CC, lots 200, 300, 400 and 2200) 2. Vicinity The four affected parcels, containing 5. 51 acres, are located along SW Pfaffle Street, north of Pacific Highway and east of SW Hall Boulevard (see map, Exhibit A) . The properties to the north across SW Pfaffle Street are designated as Low and Medium Density Residential with a zoning of R-4 . 5, R-7 and R- 12; to the east are properties zoned C-P and include the General Motors Training Center and some vacant parcels; to the 1 south is Highway 217; and to the west are three small parcels zoned C-P which include a cellular telephone monopole and a single family house. 3. Background Information Parcels A and B were annexed to the city and zoned R-4 . 5 in 1987 as part of the south Metzger annexation. Parcel C was annexed to the city in 1969 by the present owners. Parcel D, owned by ODOT, is within the original area of incorporation of the city. Parcels C and D are zoned C-P. No development applications have been reviewed for any of the four parcels. 4. Site Information and Proposal Description The triangular site of 5.51 acres is comprised of four parcels. Parcels A and B front on SW Pfaffle Street and have single family houses on them. Parcel C fronts on SW Pfaffle Street and is vacant. Parcel D is vacant and has no roadway access. All of the parcels are relatively flat but are situated approximately 20 feet above Highway 217 along their southern boundary. The applicant requests a comprehensive plan map amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential and from C-P (Commercial Professional) to Medium-High Density Residential; and a zone change from R-4.5 to R-25 and from C-P to R-25 on the four properties as follows (see map) : • Low Density Residential/R-4.5 to Medium-High Density Residential/R-25: - Parcel A: WCTM 1S1 36CC, lot 400 (0.82 acres) - Parcel B: WCTM 1S1 36CC, lot 300 (1.25 acres) • C-P (Commercial Professional) /C-P to Medium-High Density Residential/R-25: - Parcel C: WCTM 1S1 36CC, lot 200 (2 . 55 acres) - Parcel D: WCTM 1S1 36CC, lot 2200 (0.89 acres) A written document, transportation analysis and preliminary site plan have been submitted by the applicant. The written document and analysis are included as part of this staff report. The site plan was submitted as an example of what could be done on the site. Because the proposed action is a land use change and not a development application, the site plan is not part of this report, though it will be entered into the record as being part of the application. 5. Agency Comments The Engineering and Building divisions, Police Department and the Unified Sewerage Agency have reviewed the proposal and 2 r • have no objections. No other comments were received at the time of this report. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Comprehensive Plan policies 2. 1. 1, 6. 1. 1, 8. 1. 1, 8.2 .2, and 12. 1.3; and Community Development Code chapters 18.22, 18.32 and 18.56. 1. Policy 2 . 1. 1 states that the city shall maintain an ongoing citizen involvement program and shall assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process. The policy is satisfied because the surrounding property owners were given notice of public hearings related to the proposal and given the opportunity to . comment on the proposal. The notices of hearings were also posted at Tigard City Hall and advertised in a local newpaper. In addition, the applicant provided notice of and conducted a meeting on January 13, 1995, for interested property owners within a 250-foot radius of the affected properties. 2. Policy 6. 1. 1 states that the city shall provide an opportunity for a diversity of housing densities and residential types at various prices and rent levels. The designation of the affected properties to Medium-High Density Residential and R- 25 will allow for the potential development of 137 units of housing. This change would contribute to a diversity of housing opportunities for the city. If approved, the proposal would also increase the housing opportunity index from 10. 38 to 10.44 units per acre, thus helping to implement the Metropolitan Housing Rule by increasing the residential density in the city. 3. Policy 8. 1. 1 states that the city shall plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. The transportation impact analysis conducted by Kittelson and Associates, Inc. concludes that all the intersections studied along SW Pfaffle Street will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service during all time periods with full build out under the proposed zoning. Although forced-flow conditions created by traffic backed up from the SW Dartmouth/Highway 99W intersection currently occur during the peak hour periods at the SW 78th Avenue/SW Pfaffle Street intersection, the proposed zoning change would have minimal impacts on this already-existing condition. The study found that the proposed zoning would result in 480 fewer trips on the transportation system than if the site was fully developed under the current zoning. 4. Policy 12. 1.3 lists the locational criteria for designating land as medium-high and high density residential on the plan 3 map. The locational criteria can be construed in a flexible . manner in the interest of accommodating proposals which are found to be in the public interest and capable of integration into the community. The burden of proving conformance with the criteria varies with the degree of change and impact on the community. The applicable locational criteria with findings are as follows: a. Areas which are not committed to low density development. Although Parcels A and B are currently zoned R-4 .5 and have single family houses on them, the area is not committed to low density development. The parcels were annexed to the city as part of the south Metzger area in 1987. They were the only annexed parcels located south of SW Pfaffle Street and were assigned an R-4 . 5 zoning along with all the properties north of the street. This was done despite the fact that the two-parcel area had C-P zoning on each side and Highway 217 along the southern border. Parcels C and D have always been zoned for commercial uses. b. Areas which can be buffered from low density residential areas in order to maximize the privacy of established low density residential areas. The proposed area can be adequately buffered from the low density residential area on the north side of SW Pfaffle Street through the density transition, buffering and screening requirements of the Community Development Code. These requirements would be met during subdivision review when an application is submitted to the city. c. Areas which have direct access from a major collector or arterial street. The proposed area is not located on a major collector or arterial street. SW Pfaffle Street is classified as a minor collector by the city. The property is located, however, within 250 feet of SW Hall Boulevard, which is an arterial street. The Kittelson analysis indicates that the amount of traffic that would be generated by the proposed plan amendment and zone change area, even if developed to the maximum allowable density, would be less than under the current zoning designations. Less traffic will mean less impact to the existing residential development north of SW Pfaffle Street. In addition, the proposed change to residential land use on the four parcels would be more in keeping with the residential character along this portion of SW Pfaffle Street than would commercial office land use. For these reasons, strict adherence to this criterion is not warranted in this case. d. Areas which are not subject to development limitations. There are no known development limitations on the 4 • • proposed site. Detailed review of the site characteristics would be undertaken at the time of development application. e. Areas where the existing facilities have the capacity for additional development. The existing facilities and services have adequate capacity to accommodate additional development. The sanitary sewer, storm and water lines located along SW Pfaffle Street are capable of handling development allowed under the proposed changes. According to the traffic report, SW Pfaffle Street will operate at acceptable levels of service. Existing police and fire services are available and adequate for the site area. f. Areas within one-quarter mile of public transit. Public transit is available on Pacific Highway and SW Hall Boulevard, which are within one-quarter mile of the site. g. Areas within one-quarter mile from neighborhood and general commercial shopping centers or business and office centers. Within one-quarter mile of the site is the Tigard Plaza on SW Hall and the Pacific Highway corridor with access to shopping and business/office centers. h. Areas adjacent to either private or public permanent open space. There is no private or public permanent open space areas adjacent to the site. Despite this fact, the proposed plan amendment and zone change is in the public interest and is capable of harmonious integration into the community. The site would provide the capability of developing higher density, diverse housing along a transportation corridor within an established urban area. Furthermore, the flexibility of this criterion is noted where other R-25 zoned areas exist in the city without adjacent open space. For these reasons, strict adherence to this criterion is not warranted in this case. 5. Section 18. 32 of the Community Development Code sets forth the procedural requirements for review of quasi-judicial plan amendments. The application has been processed in accordance with code sections 18. 32 . 020, 18. 32 . 050 and 18. 32 . 060; the Planning Commission has conducted hearings according to 18. 32 . 090(D) ; and the requirements for notification of the hearing has been met according to 18. 32 . 130 and 18. 32 . 140. 6. Section 18.22 of the Community Development Code sets forth standards and procedures for quasi-judicial plan amendments to the zoning district map as follows: 5 i • A. A recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application for a quasi-judicial amendment shall be based on all of the following standards: 1. The applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designation and; the change will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the community. The applicable plan policies related to the proposal are reviewed above under section B (Findings and Conclusions) . 2 . The statewide planning goals adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197, until acknowledgement of the comprehensive plan and ordinances. The Tigard Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged, therefore specific review of each statewide planning goal is not applicable. Notice of filing this proposed amendment has been provided to the Department of Land Conservation and Development for comment at least 45 days prior to the final decision date. 3 . The applicable standards of any provision of this code or other applicable implementing ordinance. Code section 18. 56 (Multiple-Family Residential) contains the standards for the R-25 zone. The proposed site could meet the standards listed under "dimensional requirements" and "additional requirements" for a development. Specific future site development improvements will be reviewed through the subdivision and/or site development review procedures to ensure consistency with this section's standards. 4 . Evidence of change in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to the property which is the subject of the development application. This criterion is met because there is evidence that a mistake was made in the designations of the comprehensive plan and zoning maps regarding the affected properties. Parcels A and B were annexed to the city in 1987 as part of the south • Metzger area annexation. They were designated as Low Density Residential and zoned R-4.5 along with the properties north of SW Pfaffle Street and east of SW 83rd Avenue to comply with the Urban Planning Area Agreement (UPAA) with the county. At the time of annexation, the parcels were zoned Washington County R-5. However, it could be argued that a mistake was made at the time of designation since they were the only annexed parcels located south of SW Pfaffle Street, and the only ones zoned for residential land use. Furthermore, at the time of annexation the parcels were, and still are, bordered 6 • • on the north by medium density residential, on the east and west by C-P zoned property and on the south by Highway 217. This area is not, therefore, committed to low density residential. The UPAA did allow for an exception to the zoning requirement if the city and county agreed at the time of annexation that the county designation was outdated. Given their location within a - commercial and higher density area, the zoning on the two parcels was outdated at the time of annexation. Parcels C and D are zoned C-P. Parcel C was annexed to the city in 1969 and has remained vacant. Parcel D, currently owned by ODOT, has been part of the city since its incorporation and has remained vacant as well. Access to Parcel C is via SW Pfaffle Street only. This parcel has very limited visibility for a commercial land use due to its location and elevation above Highway 217. Parcel D has no direct access to a street. It is a triangular-shaped parcel that is land-locked by Parcel C to the north, the GM Training Center to the east and the Highway 217 north bound on-ramp to the south. The fact that no commercial development has been proposed on these parcels since the C-P zone was established may very well reflect their location and orientation. Due to the preceding evidence, the planning staff concurs with the applicant and concludes that mistakes and/or inconsistencies were made in the comprehensive plan and zoning maps regarding the affected four parcels. C. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation to the City Council for APPROVAL of Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 95-0001 and Zone Change ZON 95-0002 based upon the foregoing findings. 7 • • SPRUCE ST `�� m 1 L 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I • I ._.L I II I )i-I P-u EMPRIIIIINel THORN ST J `1 N ��I - °° � _ ■ 1. collo 1k, -I • 1 I In i 11111111111 . • . _ 411111 Oil OM=. LIU Pi= T.1 IIIIIM IIII CI .. '4 IIIII LI Z ■ • l z • • ■ Vii,, CI 111 NIP 110111?"001 r /5/*1 filf. iiI to .0 r 00, i I% 0 44% 111111 Er 140111114Alt. 99� I A. ..k i 1'S .... PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PTVICINITY EXHIBIT MAP .. .."" CHANGE F ROM LOW DEN SIT Y TO MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND //�\ ZONE CHANGE FROM R-4.5 TO R-25 �ir ,��'�CHANGE EFROM C PETO SIVE PLAN NO`TH MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND Scale 1'.400• ZONE CHANGE FROM C-P TO R-25 FEET A REFER TO STAFF REPORT 0 400 800 am. TIGARD CITY LIMITS Ik\GSDATTICICOV\NELSOWO\MYCPA.DWO 3/14/98 • • RECEIVED PLANNING ( )! Jn APR 0 71995 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION April 5, 1995 REG 1 PORTLAND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT FILE CODE: City of Tigard File: R-32774 Land Use Planning Dept. 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Enclosed please find our request for conformance of zoning information on a parcel of land located westerly of the G..M. Training Center and referred to under Parcel Number 1 S 136CC 02200.. For your convenience, you will find maps and a legal description for the subject property. Please return your findings to: Oregon Department of Transportation 123 NW Flanders Portland, OR 97209-4037 U Attn: Linda Beveridge Sincerely, 16'e1UU`'Lit. 6)/Q Jinda Beveridge Office Specialist Property Management Unit John A.Kitzhaber Governor •Y HiEio 123 NW Flanders Portland, OR 97209-4037 (503) 731-8449 734-1962(1/95) 4 FAX (503) 731-8458 °1e'°'Department d • STATEMENT OF CONFORMAN!E WITH LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SALE OF STATE-OWNED LAND R-32774 Denny Rd. -Pacific Highwa , • Beaverton-Tigard The State of Oregon, Department of Transportation has declared subject land surplus to their needs. A map and description of the parcel is attached, in accordance with ORS 92.016, ORS 92.018 and applicable City or County regulations, the State is inquiring about land division status from the (City/D=94 of Tigard in preparation for sale of property. 1. ❑ This lot was created by a legally approved partition or subdivision and meets the zoning code requirements. 2. This lot was legally divided by an acquisition of right of way for a state highway and may be sold as a legal lot (ORS 92.010) 3. n Does not meet current zoning code requirements but has "grandfather rights" as an individual piece of property and may be sold as such. 4. ❑ This lot may be lawfully sold only via a lot line adjustment. • 5. n Does not meet local requirements and needs: a. ❑ Variances (list) b. ❑ Partitioning 6. H Does not meet local requirements for the following reason(s): Existing zoning: C- P Cb���.�:.01- /.-o ICG.ss��—/ Additional comments: se'"a �' -54 w49 & �s-s �•..e-.vf s) (voptp • • e =kel' ..i2. a-.�..4._ Zf— ow SIGNATURE TITLE DATE 734-2074(3-95) • • EXHIBIT A File R32774 Denny Road-Pacific Highway West Section Beaverton-Tigard Highway Washington County Drg. No. 8B-20-6 RWN 12-21-94 D.O.T. RJW ;ENGINEERING �- 1 INAL Sale DO NCT HHEMOVE FROM FILE A parcel of land lying in the George Richardson D.L.C. No. 55, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, W.M. , Washington County, Oregon and being a portion of that property described in those deeds to the State of Oregon, by and through its State Highway Commission, recorded in Book 453, Page 133 and in Book 453 Page 342 of Washington County Record of Deeds; the said parcel being that portion of said property lying Northeasterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point opposite and 190 feet Northeasterly of Engineer's Station 399+44.35 on the center line of the relocated Beaverton - Tigard Highway; thence Southeasterly in a straight line to a point opposite and 260 feet Northeasterly. of Engineer's Station 404+25 on said center line; thence Southeasterly in a straight line to a point opposite and 250 feet Northeasterly, of Engineer's Station 406+00 on said center line, which center line is described in said State of Oregon deeds. The parcel of land of which this description applies contains 0.89 acre, more or less. • • NOTE: AREA BREAKDOWN 32774 - 0.61 acre, more or less. 32775 - 0.28 acre, more or less. - This parcel lies within the SW}SW} of Sec 36, T 1 S, R 1 W, W.M. •,JENCER VAIL 0 FLA. . . NG CONSULTANT saws.December 29 , 1994 Re: Andrews Management Proposed Plan Amendment and Zone Change Dear Interested Party I represent the property owners and optional purchasers of property on the south side of SW Pfaffle between the Cellular One facility on the west, at SW Hall and the GM Training Center complex on the east. Specifically, the properties involved are Tax Lot 200 , 300 , 400 and 2200 on Map 1S136CC. (see enclosed map) We are considering a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change for these lots from the existing CP, Commercial Professional , to R-25, Multi-Family Residential at the above location. Before to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to a meeting on: Friday, January 13 , 1995 Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Tigard, Oregon 97223 7:00 PM Please note that this will be an informational meeting on the Preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to submittal to the city. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you at the meeting. Please call me if you have any questions regarding the proposal . Very truly your // IP fencer H. Vail encl 1505 N.E. 24TH AVENUE • PORTLAND. OREGON 97211 • 503/281-8245 • FAX 503/284-5506 • . 3 "'To' ' 500 • ' - �j c. 14 l u,a - 14 __j�• — — L _ _ 13 32Qp al 33 1tT" ' 4 N as ` 13 4 1..� Z �/t t y 700 _ own I R 6200 1800 (� 22C: •LK o dSAC. 3100 t/�:12; •R•-' w ' 17f S• 3 i q•/f T•.x• 14 _ 3 - : 6300� B90 900 azgr _ e•..LSAT 036Ac.•• I g"2d 16'v 3000 y� a<r 19 00 2 I C — 7 ¢ as P 2 ° �o To' 6400 6500 3 3 r. M474 1 I.• a M nsr�oa'r --- -IS- N 2• » 2J00 • p.1900 3 .- 1 3 I ao -ti 36 =°. 37 . = 2 0 .as I _:° _•: K u u 1 r nat ar `a 16 N ♦ r It3 • 1 n.:• aan .c L��r "1 at I • •ad ersur of-•x,ca u.•'w.nr•r ° .•= d �••-+.sxs•.• .. �xLOx •rasafs 1 Kr&lia o R 2 nea•vao r "�w•xr•�c � '...1, +311666 . Fe S.W. PFAF - ST. •• SW 1 C.A. 975 -►PFAFFLE 1C 1400 . '1000 i. s es-xlc 1131.66 AC -23AC . .� r^ 00 .' �' 300 200 100 -/p .82Ae. LZSAc Z554c T-yam X `.. 20, ...Is -14 ¢- it -400.aft . I_`. L— 2...../ t v • �� °'. == = M E T R O 1 4 1 1 C A N P R O P E R T Y R O F I L E = Washington County ******************************************************************************** * * * OWNERSHIP INFORMATION * * * * Reference Parcel #: 1S136CC 02200 * * Parcel Number :R1238510 TRSQ:01S-01W-36-SW SW * * Owner :OREGON STATE OF HWY DIVISION * * CoOwner * :* Site Address :*NO SITE ADDRESS* * * Mail Address * * Telephone :Owner Tenant * * * * SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION * * * * Transferred:04/07/89 Loan Amount * * Document # : 11139 Lender • * Sale Price : Loan Type • * Deed Type Interest Rate: * * % Owned Vesting Type * * * ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION * * * * Land :$64,780 Exempt Amount: * * Structure : Exempt Type :EXEMPT * * Other % Improved * * Total :$64,780 Levy Code :02381 * * 94-95Taxes: School Dist :TIGARD * * * * PROPERTY DESCRIPTION * * * * Map Grid: Class Code: * * Census :Tract Block * * NbrhdCd :ZPHY MillRate : 15.6392 * * Sub/Plat: * * Land Use:9052 GOV,STATE * * Legal :ACRES .89, NON-ASSESSABLE * * • * * * * * * PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS * * * * Bedrooms Lot Acres : .89 Year Built : * * Bathrooms Lot SqFt :38,768 EffYearBlt : * * Heat Method: BsmFin SF : Floor Cover: * * Pool BsmUnfinSF: Foundation : * * Appliances : Bldg SgFt : Roof Shape : * * Dishwasher : lstFlrSqFt: Roof Matl * * Hood Fan UpperFlSF : InteriorMat: * * Deck Porch SqFt: Paving Matl: * * Garage Type: Attic SqFt: Const Type: * * Garage SF Deck SqFt : Ext Finish: * ******************************************************************************** The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. t . k 6& Z:''''''''-' �O lOi s-1 o N j .ei 5 ��/ 1r t JJ ': e+n v ia ,Fs e• i 1 I rn n4 v; 1 NI -- �v a r �J `Q• / f • \ 01�'y J o' ' / / 4- . N. ya s k\ q. /// / r Q�j`ice;' �. A 1,�'\ 1 / p�" i 4 v I I 1 i 7 • N.z // / \\ et t� pee •�t;P1 �„ ;�`t f;!`� r J el o ;cy-'� o'k,,` / / ?k1Nk m ", A (� ,%, `'' / 3247 ` . : ° ;z t. D G`� :� -. B T l J• oo ,�33 3¢ 7� '(S tioa�°' ,h ar i 2,? 1 „I �`' ,�0 ._ 0. 1 i ems ' rr r o Q.4ZAC• Y NN S, b% `;. ' 40/ . e _ K�.r(R�4. 2,qe.if r • : :.�qC,_^" `, N fi23o f /, , .7 Q �� / ` / `;;;o N \k j �, Aa°�� � p.99/re / ; '�'�ti'1 � pee J.� V �\ ✓ 4 / 4 • t --' — Ir V��V a°� �• // /;C / "3 w X369 - 2 ,Q=�RW Zg ° ,'� j '" , ..wP�y = ate-:.' '` \ CP A °'Z5 BAd'� a/M°° e• G/-29 Q aced -/'� e/� ti, GtS4 Aa �y'L, Z4!/k 1 / ! \ if X. tit' (Pkt- la/yS•% 32744 a y .- , o 6sA/R �. �. ,� t. '�°"® t --:'.1.;"':-..- f 32777 J 4h, o.z�Ac. > > `fib 4113 A. Stt�4 Rty13�s�. OA4A _ 327&°g Vy i *��4 ��r' `� t �f OatdRn'23/G6 x 32779 1 1 1 AV,. , i At• Vol," 3l� 8' L c•• . :} .4w 4 v DetdRM234Tf' SS { N \ `\ �6 l��gti�r4 . /t� �1 7, 0, O 4 ,� ' ' ?19 .E��i j�I+� "� . -r:+. ... ! ' •1f5 302 • / j 414 '1 Q . .,<irzc'.' 4330 Gof.bi ••,�f y` •_ '�� �"' "',= t : j • I t ` '..1,... ,• -•1 • •� ti x.94 Ac. Y �' S51�� 8t► �l i�'-. "'� h -r; 3 J t \\ = °/ �• / ° tai h'��' e� Aa =� c, �� Y ,��b,�� I��j1 4, , o i N. 3v/, �v F ��,` � 0 , . II • \/ 'f° 77 '\ O ® � G oa0.5+44AcQ 1 ' _ 39 ' N ;f t/`r' srq'Z3 39 ,' \ �/ / '', �����' i� i i.. .. O ,Vg 0456-432 k• J t ••• • 0 ',4-25971 ( .1.- t - - ' . ..,, .,-jo,„. III Willi,. � ' \ 4V, ti°` J >` '�• ':32772 Z� -p- —� jj , .:_ J J\ ® • prp , .y.b-1 \ ' Air k6 ass ©: t t'�1 � T 4r ���� ,�q \ f �..,O�Z'� �'E".. y , Awe,, ,, 'bie a0� • J r �+ :,'`', JPw SO' r' "'6s \�� �\ !l' °' • 1 ' h :A!:7 2 O.f4e. hh ©O 01 xd. r t zx,ZI 448 -5 Z7 \ ` '"• a Q 0.2s/rt.Rr ti '►1 `► h .d�y"'1� M t 0 ZQ Aa. ,..war�af. %•o.. _ v.a ,� / '� a 1'\ •. "°'\N 773 �� ' air 9s3 \`• -,... * ,� \L y fit! pa b "1 : . rym �wto9ie D' v I I •© ..'7, c Al' �, \''- �` ``` •,' GaA ra \ k X ti RA r4ti o . ,.':; u/LZ 0.9. l �„Ili. j ' ,re 0.02 ti ��Z \�\ ` 0• i'• r � , Vl tj s F / . nxy, r �"t % ,; ;2/:::� ,<A r/ /r °1hs 'may. ss'�0 a Q 11 16:/\,/ A .41.0, 1 , - < e** ...1‘.. •..,, Ci..-:„......Qi a 4.: . t■ t** 0 ..\ -rva . NN l' ,/ ./':1 p'�a,. fi ,(9 „../1:n t. • • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS I CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TO: DATE: March 16, 1995 FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Rav Valone (x336) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (5003)684-7297 RE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT(CPA)95-0001/ZONE CHANGE(ZON)'95-0002 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT ► A request to amend the comprehensive plan mapom C-P (Commercial Professional) and Low-Density Residential to Medium-High Density Re )dential, and to change the zoning from C-P and R-4.5 to R-25. LOCATION: South of SW P . le Street at SW 83rd Avenue (WCTM 1S1 36CC, tax lots 200, 300 400 and , 00). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:Comprehensive Plan Polici ss2, 6 and 12; .mmuni Development Code Chapters 18.22, 18.32 and 18.56 and the ch 4 ge or mistake .u: i- ud• ' plan map amendment criteria of the comprehensive plan (policy 1.1. m°mu ity development code (18.22.040). ZONE: Currently, two parcels (3.44 acres) are C-P and two parcels (2.07 acres) are R-4.5. The C-P zone allows groups of businesses and offices in centers to provide opportunities for employment and for business and professional services. The R-4.5 district allows single-family residential units, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, family day care, and home occupations among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - March 27, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE HECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: • • (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 a ilaft'MAN�GEMENT March 16,1995 • NOTE TO FILE CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 I received a call from Marty Jensvold of ODOT on April 12, 1995. He called to explain ODOT's comments on this proposal that are contained in a letter dated April 7, 1995. Some confusion, he said, may have arisen because Laurie Nicholson used information from Marty's memo to her in the letter to the city; however, not all of this information was conveyed in the letter. ODOT does not oppose the proposal in general, but the staff has concerns about the traffic that will be generated by it. Marty said that R-25 is particularly dense in the area considering that R-12 is the highest around; and any additional traffic will add to the degraded conditions at the 99W/Dartmouth intersection. On the other hand, they recognize that less traffic would be generated under the proposed zoning than the existing one at build out. For this reason, he realizes ODOT would have a weak argument if they appealed the decision. He thought maybe the city could zone it to a less dense designation. I explained to him that it is an applicant's proposal and it meets all the city's criteria - that is why staff is recommending approval. I told him the proposal still must be heard by the PC and CC, and they could deny it. Also, I told him that the area with two parcels south of Pfaffle, zoned R-4. 5, can not be considered dedicated to Low Density because of its location. • IL REQUEST FOR COMMENTS / CITY OF TIGARO OREGON TO: _!� � DATE: March 16, 1995 FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Rav Valone (x336) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT(CPA)95-0001/ZONE CHANGE(ZON)95-0002 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT ► A request to amend the comprehensive plan map from C-P (Commercial Professional) and Low-Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential, and to change the zoning from C-P and R-4.5 to R-25. LOCATION: South of SW Pfaffle Street at SW 83rd Avenue (WCTM 1S1 36CC, tax lots 200, 300, 400 and 2,200). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:Comprehensive Plan Policies 2, 6, 8 and 12; Community Development Code Chapters 18.22, 18.32 and 18.56 and the change or mistake quasi-judicial plan map amendment criteria of the comprehensive plan (policy 1.1.2) and community development code (18.22.040). ZONE: Currently, two parcels (3.44 acres) are C-P and two parcels (2.07 acres) are R-4.5. The C-P zone allows groups of businesses and offices in centers to provide opportunities for employment and for business and professional services. The R-4.5 district allows single-family residential units, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, family day care, and home occupations among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - March 27, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: I,/v/ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information) (� Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: ) CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 ANDERSON MANAGEMENT March 16,1995 • • • /' EQUEST FOR COMMENTS �u�l iJ ' CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TO: /�fi.1 ,.4 Vi iAta 1/' DATE: March 16, 1995 I/ / FROM: Tigard P : Department STAFF CONTACT: Ray Valone (x336) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT(CPA)95-0001/ZONE CHANGE(ZON)95-0002 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT ► A request to amend the comprehensive plan map from C-P (Commercial Professional) and Low-Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential, and to change the zoning from C-P and R-4.5 to R-25. LOCATION: South of SW Pfaffle Street at SW 83rd Avenue (WCTM 1S1 36CC, tax lots 200, 300, 400 and 2,200). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:Comprehensive Plan Policies 2, 6, 8 and 12; Community Development Code Chapters 18.22, 18.32 and 18.56 and the change or mistake quasi-judicial plan map amendment criteria of the comprehensive plan (policy 1.1.2) and community development code (18.22.040). ZONE: Currently, two parcels (3.44 acres) are C-P and two parcels (2.07 acres) are R-4.5. The C-P zone allows groups of businesses and offices in centers to provide opportunities for employment and for business and professional services. The R-4.5 district allows single-family residential units, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, family day care, and home occupations among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - March 27, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ec�'r—r'1� n6) /0" . 42. :► BLS a , 'cas aro (Please provide the following information) / / mow . 594 Name of Person Commentin:. - Phone Number: I k c2 7 CPA 95-0001/ZON 95.0002 ANDERSON MANAGEMENT March 16,1995 • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TO: /l. . • DATE: March 16, 1995 Iv yr' FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Rav Valone (x336) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT(CPA)95-0001/ZONE CHANGE(ZON)95-0002 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT ► A request to amend the comprehensive plan map from C-P (Commercial Professional) and Low-Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential, and to change the zoning from C-P and R-4.5 to R-25. LOCATION: South of SW Pfaffle Street at SW 83rd Avenue (WCTM 1S1 36CC, tax lots 200, 300, 400 and 2,200). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:Comprehensive Plan Policies 2, 6, 8 and 12; Community Development Code Chapters 18.22, 18.32 and 18.56 and the change or mistake quasi-judicial plan map amendment criteria of the comprehensive plan (policy 1.1.2) and community development code (18.22.040). ZONE: Currently, two parcels (3.44 acres) are C-P and two parcels (2.07 acres) are R-4.5. The C-P zone allows groups of businesses and offices in centers to provide opportunities for employment and for business and professional services. The R-4.5 district allows single-family residential units, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, family day care, and home occupations among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - March 27, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: XWe have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: • No77FY A Pe -/cA.A/T 7/110447 7 Perrar26 Aer/d9eop,.esi ' p/ZOPoseP Go/e.?-- NGeP 7v 4 PA2e- -s /7 7- lze pv ftZe sa.. A-ms's Avitars Fait 77/67- siztr PZo.J9 T 51/196.AJ ' �G 7?1i t /6 �.. 71;6' . 9Br12raff offfir/frd deJet4/ ,41/ a/14sr 7/Ze ,1V,b5ee/Zorl�i7y Q1,J�li�S �d �� �e s 70 (Please provide the following information) d .fi'G' c Name of Person Commenting: 1L�.a:,_ / i o "401 G/ ,/kael/ '7L Phone Number: XXT 3/8 aifhr 6o-57 /(9 March 16,1995 CPA 95-000120N 95-0002 ANDERSON MANAGEMENT • • Omgon April 7, 1995 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION City of Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Region 1 Tigard, OR 97223 Attention: Ray Valone FILE CODE: P LA-9-TI G Subject: Andrews Management, CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 This letter is to provide follow-up to previous comments, submitted on 4-5-95. We are providing comments on the traffic study for this comprehensive plan amendment. In general, we do not oppose this plan amendment and rezone. Our comments are: • Although the proposed apartments are expected to generate fewer trips than a 37,000 square foot medical office building, they will generate more trips than are generated now; therefore, the development will contribute to the degradation of conditions in the vicinity of 99W. • The report refers to "improvement of the SW Dartmouth Street/Highway 99W intersection" alleviating traffic conditions in the area. It is questionable whether improvements will ever be made to this intersection that would bring it up to an acceptable level of service. There are no roadway improvements planned in the near future that would significantly improve conditions. • There are a number of developments in the area which, once constructed, will make conditions significantly worse. Given these conditions, the city should consider land uses and/or densities that will decrease peak hour impacts to the transportation system, rather than increase peak hour use. • An access directly across from 83rd Avenue should be considered. • According to Figure 5 in the report, the proposed site plan appears to landlock Lot 2200. The site design must allow for access for Lot 2200 through the development to Pfeifle. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. If you have questions, please call me at 731-8232. aurie Nicholn • • Development Review Planner cc: Marty Jensvold, Sam Hunaidi 123 NW Flanders • Portland, OR 97209-4037 (503) 731-8200 734-1850(11-94) FAX (503) 731-8259 04/07/95 10:45 $50373159 ODOT - REGION 1 lj002/002 • • Oregon April 7, 1995 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION City of Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Region 1 Tigard, OR 97223 Attention: Ray Valone FILE CODE: P LA-9-TI G Subject: Andrews Management, CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 This letter is to provide follow-up to previous comments, submitted on 4-5-95. We are providing comments on the traffic study for this comprehensive plan amendment. In general, we do not oppose this plan amendment and rezone. Our comments are: • Although the proposed apartments are expected to generate fewer trips than a 37,000 square foot medical office building, they will generate more trips than are generated now; therefore, the development will contribute to the degradation of conditions in the vicinity of 99W. • The report refers to "improvement of the SW Dartmouth Street/Highway 99W intersection" alleviating traffic conditions in the area. It is questionable whether improvements will ever be made to this intersection that would bring it up to an acceptable level of service. There are no roadway improvements planned in the near future that would significantly improve conditions. • There are a number of developments in the area which, once constructed, will make conditions significantly worse. Given these conditions, the city should consider land uses and/or densities that will decrease peak hour impacts to the transportation system, rather than increase peak hour use. • An access directly across from 83rd Avenue should be considered. • According to Figure 5 in the report, the proposed site plan appears to landlock Lot 2200. The site design must allow for access for Lot 2200 through the development to Pfaffle. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments_ If you have questions, please call me at 731-8232. aurie Nichol2n Development Review Planner cc: Marty Jensvold, Sam Hunaidi rt.;,V 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 972094037 (503) 731-8200 734-1850(11-94) FAX (503) 731-8259 • • RECEIVED PLANNING Omgon April 5, 1995 APR 0 6 1995 City of Tigard Planning Department DEPARTMENT OF 13125 SW Hall Boulevard TRANSPORTATION Tigard, OR 97223 Region 1 Attention: Ray Valone Subject: Andrews Management, CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 FILE CODE: PLA-9-TIG ODOT has reviewed the subject application and has comments regarding this land use action. Our comments are: • A traffic study is required to determine the impacts to the intersection of Hall Boulevard and Pfaff le Street. • If the applicant plans to connect to the ODOT drainage system, then on-site detention is required. • All work performed in the state right-of-way will require a permit. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. If you have questions, please contact me at 731-8232. Adis Laurie Nicholson Development Review Planner cc: Sam Hunaidi, District 2A Permit Specialist • • 123 NW Flanders - Portland,OR 97209-4037 (503) 731-8200 734-1850(11-94) FAX (503) 731-8259 :04/05/95 06:48 $50373159 ODOT - REGION 1 C�ooi/ooi FAX DATA SHEET TO: DATE: TIME: 7 S ' S &i LOCATION: NO. OF PAGES (including cover page): 1 Viraf(j. crirtL FROM: FAX NO.: ODOT,'REGION 1 123 NW Flanders " Portland, OR 97209-4037 (If not received correctly, call At $p..3 FAX (503) 731-8259 (503) 731-8200) Message: Special Instruction: [ ] Confidential [ ] Urgent [ ] Please reply [ ] For your information [] As requested • Oregor April 5, 1995 City of Tigard Planning Department DEPARTMENT of 13125 SW Hall Boulevard TRANSPORTA,T.IOr Tigard, OR 97223 Region 1 Attention: Ray Valone Subject: Andrews Management, CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 FILE CODE: PLA-9-TIG ODOT has reviewed the subject application and has comments regarding this land use action. Our comments are: • • A traffic study is required to determine the impacts to the intersection of Hall Boulevard and Pfaffle Street. • If the applicant plans to connect to the ODOT drainage system, then on-site detention is required. • All work performed in the state right-of-way will require a permit. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. If you have questions, ".7•111 "nnn i a c t.UI Ildl.l I i dl o I^O1.1Z. • • ,'1 ,BE4 • Laurie Nicholson Development Review Planner cc: Sam Hunaidi, District 2A Permit Specialist ior 123 NW Flanders Portland, OR 97209-4037 (503) 731-8200 734-1.850(11.94) FAX (503) 731-8259 • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TO: DATE: March 16, 1995 FROM: Tigard Planning Departn nt STAFF CONTACT: Rav Valone (x336) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684.7297 RE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT(CPA)95-0001/ZONE CHANGE(ZON195-0002 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT ► A request to amend the comprehensive plan map from C-P (Commercial Professional) and Low-Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential, and to change the zoning from C-P and R-4.5 to R-25. LOCATION: South of SW Pfaffle Street at SW 83rd Avenue (WCTM 1S1 36CC, tax lots 200, 300, 400 and 2,200). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:Comprehensive Plan Policies 2, 6, 8 and 12; Community Development Code Chapters 18.22, 18.32 and 18.56 and the change or mistake quasi-judicial plan map amendment criteria of the comprehensive plan (policy 1.1.2) and community development code (18.22.040). ZONE: Currently, two parcels (3.44 acres) are C-P and two parcels (2.07 acres) are R-4.5. The C-P zone allows groups of businesses and offices in centers to provide opportunities for employment and for business and professional services. The R-4.5 district allows single-family residential units, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, family day care, and home occupations among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - March 27, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _� We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: V • I • waLJ{az/ Phone Number: Lo /-4' tS SG CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 ANDERSON MANAGEMENT March 16,1995 IP 12 a'I Council Agenda Item TIGARD CITY COUNCIL, MEETING MINUTES - MAY 30, 1995 • Meeting was called to order at 6:37 p.m. by Mayor Nicoli. 1. ROLL CALL. Council Present Mayor Jim Nicoll; Councilors Wendi Conover Hawley, Paul Hunt, Bob Rohif, and Ken Scheckla. Staff Present Bill Monahan, City Administrator John Acker, Property Manager;Will D'Andrea,Assistant Planner; Pam Beery, Legal Counsel; Senior Planner Bewersdort Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director; Carol Landsman, Senior Planner; Liz Newton, Community Involvement Coordinator; Ray Valone, Associate Planner; Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder; and Randy Wooley, City Engineer. STUDY SESSION Planning Commissioners present Carolyn DeFrang, James Griffith, and Ron Holland. • Tigard Triangle Traffic Study Senior Planner Landsman introduced this topic. Council met with consultants who recently completed the Traffic Study for the Tigard Triangle. Several months ago, Council directed staff to begin the work necessary to amend the Comprehensive Plan by changing area in the Triangle presently designated low density and public facilities to general commercial. The first step was to conduct a transportation study to see if the street network could support these changes. The report reviewed by Council indicates that without making any changes to the transportation network, the proposed land use changes will lead to a service level of 'F' at almost all intersections in the Triangle area The consultant reviewed potential transportation strategies which.were offered in the report. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 30, 1995 - PAGE 1 IP 0 • There will be a 'Town Hair type of meeting with the residents and commercial property owners in the area on June 6 at 7 p.m. to discuss options. ODOT has concerns with a rezone of the area. The Mayor asked that a representative from ODOT also be at this Town Hall meeting to tell the persons attending what these concerns are. Randy McCourt of DOS Associates reviewed the consultant report Robin McArthur Phillips of the Oregon Department of Transportation was present, and advised that with regard to traffic impacts and resulting needs for transportation improvements, there is no available funding. Any transportation improvements would have to be submitted in the six year transportation program; it would be ten to fifteen years before any improvements would be rearmed. Council discussed the various alternatives offered, inducting the 1-5/217 study, which may offer some benefit to the area by identification of transportation improvements. • USA EFFLUENT WATER FOR COOK PARK IRRIGATION Property Manager John Acker reviewed his memorandum, which is on file in the Council packet material. After discussion, Council consensus was to approve that staff pursue the concept of cooperating with the Tualatin Country Club and the City of Tualatin in a project to build an effluent water distribution system for irrigation. • SELECTION OF CONSULTANT FOR WATER RATE STUDY Councilor Hunt noted the recent Intergovernmental Water Board review of consultants for the water rate study. After brief discussion, City Council members decided to consider this matter on June 13, 1995. BUSINESS MEETING 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA: • Jack Polans, 16000 SW Queen Victoria Place, King City, Oregon, 97224, questioned whether the effluent water project as referred to in Mr. Acker's report to Council during the Study Session would have any effect on the - Intergovernmental Water Board. Mayor Nicoli advised this was independent of the IWB; the agreement would be among the City of Tigard, City of Tualatin and Tualatin Country Club. City Administrator Monahan pointed out this would represent a water conservation measure by using effluent water, rather than potable water, to irrigate Cook Park. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 30, 1995 - PAGE 2 • Mr. Polans questioned the status of the Dolan case. Mayor Nicoli noted some of the information Mr. Polans was requesting was privileged (potential and pending litigation), and he could not respond, as those issues are under negotiation. He advised Mr. Polans that a public hearing on the matter was tentatively scheduled for June 27, 1995; a staff report would be available one week in advance. Councilor Scheckla added that the Dolans and their attorneys have asked for the extra time on this matter. - Martha Bishop, 10590 SW Cook Lane, Tigard, Oregon, 97223, spoke with regard to Music in the Park. She noted the purpose of the effort by Music in the Park supporters was to provide a facility for musical and cultural programs for the public. She noted that people have approached her and indicated they are interested in the concept She said she would appreciate unanimous support by City Council of the Music in the Park concept • Mary Payne, 16277 SW 130th Terrace,Tigard, Oregon, 97223, advised she was a member of the Music in the Park committee. She noted this effort had begun about twenty years ago; however, funding was transferred to provide for soccer fields. The original plan has been resurrected. Cook Park is the park of choice because of the ability to provide police protection. They would like to have a permanent stage of treated wood on concrete, similar to other improvements already in place at Cook Park. In the past, stage presentations were conducted on flatbed trucks; however, there are concerns about liability (safety issues) with this type of structure. Ms. Payne thanked Council in advance for their support. There was discussion about when Council would consider funding for this proposal. When discussed at the last Council meeting, the plan was to have Council consider funding once the committee had put together a proposal with consideration of funding scheduled for June 13, 1995. • Gene McAdams, 13420 SW Brittany Drive, Tigard, Oregon, distributed information to Council which supported his assertion that the 130th/Winterlalce connection has been part of the planned connection in the area as it has developed over the years. He recommended that Council remember, when setting capital improvement project priorities, that 130th/Winterlake is a collector street (Handouts distributed by Mr. McAdams are on file with the Council meeting packet.) Mr. McAdams noted the Planning Commission approved the Capital Improvement Project list by a six-to-one vote at their last meeting. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 30, 1995 - PAGE 3 • • 3. CONSENT AGENDA: Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: 3.1 City Council Minutes: May 16, 1995 3.2 Local Contract Review Board: a Award Janitorial Contract to Pony Express and Authorize the City Administrator to Sign Contract b. Accept Quote from Kerr Contractors Inc. for Installing 1,000 Lineal Feet of 12-inch Ductile Iron Water Main on S.W. Beef Bend Road Motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicola and Councilors Hawley, Hunt, RAIN, and Scheckla voted 'yes.") 4. PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 95-0001/ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 95-0002 ANDREWS cMANAGEMENT A request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Map from C-P (Commercial Professional)and Low-Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential,and to change the zoning from C-P and R-4.5 to R-25. LOCATION: South of SW Pfaffle Street at SW 83rd Avenue (WCTM 1S1 36CC, tax lots 200, 300, 400 and 2200). APPUCABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA: Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.2, 2, 6, 8 and 12; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.22, 18.32 and 18.56. ZONE: Currently, two parcels (3.44 acres) are C-P and two parcels (207 acres)are R-4.5. The C-P zone allows groups of businesses and offices in centers to provide opportunities for employment and for business and professional services. The R-4.5 district allows single-family residential units, public support fealties, residential treatment homes, farming, family day care, and home occupations among other uses. a. Public Hearing was opened. b. Declarations or Challenges. Mayor Nicoli read the following statement - Do any members of Council wish to report any ex parte contact or information gained outside the hearing, including any site visits? (None were reported.) - Have all members familiarized themselves with the application? (All indicated they had familiarized themselves with the application.) - Are there any challenges from the audience pertaining to the Council's jurisdiction to hear this matter or is there a challenge on CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 30, 1995 - PAGE 4 • • the participation of any member of the Council? (There were none.) c. Staff Report Associate Planner Ray Valone summarized the staff report. Mr. Valone referred to a map indicating location of the proposal. He referred to comments from the Oregon Department of Transportation. (See letter from ODOT on file with the Council packet material.) In general, ODOT does not oppose this Comprehensive Plan Amendment and re-zone. Mr. Valone advised that staff agrees that a mistake has been made and this would warrant that the request of the applicant be granted... • The portion of the subject site now zoned C-P has no direct access to SW Pacific Highway and does not have good visibility from the highway. Trips to any commercial business activity would be required to use SW Pfaffle to get to the site. This would draw commercial traffic through a predominantly residential area. • The portion of the subject site now zoned R-4.5, low density residential, no longer meets locational criteria. It abuts Pacific Highway on the south and the commercially zoned lot on the SW corner of SW Hal and Pfaffle. • New apartment development has occurred on the corner of SW Hall and PfafHe. This is not indicative of an area 'committed to low density development' • Based on the above, a mistake can be said to have been made in the original plan designation for these properties. There are terrain differences and access problems which separate these lots from the other commercial zones and business activities fronting on SW Pacific Highway. Surrounding features such as Hall Blvd. and Pacific Highway, as well as being adjacent to commercial zones, takes the R-4.5 lots out of an area committed to low density development. Council then asked several questions to clarify issues on this property and about the uses of adjacent properties. It was noted there are single-family homes in the area which will remain. There were some questions with regard to traffic patterns/concerns. Associate Planner Valone advised those issues would be addressed during the pre-application meeting at the time a development project is proposed. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 30, 1995 - PAGE 5 • d. Public Testimony. Mayor Nicoll read the following statement For all those wishing to testify, please be aware that failure to raise an issue with sufficient specificity to afford the Council and parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals on this issue. Testimony and evidence must be directed toward the criteria that staff will describe or other criteria in the plan or land use regulation which you believe apply to the decision. Spencer Vale, 4505 NE 24th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97211, testified on behalf of the applicant He said they concurred with staff findings and asked that Council approve the request Mr. Vale noted there are four properties included in the application and authorization was received from all property owners named in the application. He noted the reason the properties were put together as a package is because it appeared this would create a logical re-zone of the area and could be completed in one process. He referred to the traffic analysis which is contained in the Council packet Mr.Vale advised there was a neighborhood meeting plus a hearing before the Planning Commission. No objections have been raised by property owners. Jack Polans, 16000 SW Queen Victoria Place, ling City, Oregon, 97224, stated that this property represented more development and more traffic. He recommended that ODOT be aware of and do something about increased traffic which resulted in more auto-exhaust pollutants. He noted the traffic auto exhaust emissions contribute to a higher risk of cancer. e. Council Questions Associate Planner Valone clarified for Councilor Scheckla the urban planning area agreement and its effect on zoning of the property at the time of annexation in 1987. The property when viewed in relationship to the surrounding properties, advised Mr. Valone, appears to be zoned erroneously. f. Public Hearing was dosed. g. Staff Recommendation. Associate Planner Valone advised the staff recommends that City Council approve the proposed application. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 30, 1995 - PAGE 6 • i. ORDINANCE NO. 95-10 - AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE REQUESTED BY ANDREWS MANAGEMENT (CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002). j. Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to adopt Ordinance No. 95-10. k. Motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoll and Councilors Hawley, Hunt, Rohif, and Schedda voted 'yes.') 5. PUBLIC HEARING (LEGISLATIVE) -ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT(ZOA) 95-0001 ROBINSON/BOWEN PROPOSED AMENDMENTS ■ A proposal to amend Tigard Community Development Code Sections 18.26.030,18.26.030(B)(4), 18.26.030(B)(5), 18.26.030(c)(3), 18.180.080(A) and 18.80.120(3)(j) to allow fee simple townhomes in the planned development district APPUCABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning goals 1, 2, 9, 10 and 12; Comprehensive Plan - Poliicies 1, 2 and 6; Community Development Code Chapter 18.030. a Public Hearing was opened. b. Staff Report. Senior Planner Bewersdorff introduced Associate Planner Will D'Andrea who summarized the staff report for Council. Mr. D'Andrea reviewed the current and proposed language in the Community Development Code with regard to single-family attached, common wall town homes. Mr. D'Andrea advised the Planning Commission recommended approval. There was clarification of the duster parking concept which would allow some parking to be elsewhere on the site rather than directly in front of the residence. c. Public Testimony. Applicant Mike Robinson, 900 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 2300, Portland, Oregon, 97204, testified on behalf of the applicant He noted he agreed with the staff and Planning Commission recommendation. He advised the architect, Mr. Bob Moreland, was also present and available to answer any questions. Mr. Robinson asked Council to approve the ordinance with an emergency clause in order to make the ordinance effective immediately. Mr. Robinson advised he would be glad to draft findings to support the emergency clause. - CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 30, 1995 - PAGE 7 4110 411 Opponent Jack Polans, 16000 SW Queen Victoria Place, King City, Oregon, 97224, requested clarification of the type of dwellings proposed.- Mr. Polans noted concerns with this type of housing and that it would bring down the value of other housing. d. Council Questions. Council discussed the requested emergency clause for the proposed ordinance. Legal Counsel Beery advised that emergency clauses are granted in those instances where there is a need for the ordinance immediately to provide for the public welfare and good. In absence of compelling evidence, an emergency clause should not be used. With regard to timing concerns of the applicant, it was noted the applicant could begin processing their development application, with the final approvals to be delayed until after the thirty-day waiting period for the effective date of the ordinance. There was Council discussion on this type of housing and its acceptance by existing residents. Senior Planner Bewersdorff noted that generally, residents already in an area would prefer to have a development with this type of housing over multi-family housing. There were also questions with regard to driveway set-backs and private streets usually within such developments. Private streets would be maintained by the developer. e. Public Hearing dosed. f. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommended approval of the application as presented. g. Council Consideration: Councilors noted in general they had no problems with the proposed application; however, Councilors did note they could not see any value or reasoning to add an emergency clause to the ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 95-11 - AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND PROVISIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE,SECTIONS 18.26, 18.56, 18.80, AND 18.164 TO PERMIT SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED COMMON WALL TOWN HOMES ON FEE SIMPLE OWNERSHIP LOTS. h. Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Hawley, to approve Ordinance No. 95-11. - CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 30, 1995 - PAGE 8 • Motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli and Councilors Hawley, Hunt, Rohtf, and Scheckla voted yes?) 6. NON-AGENDA ITEMS. a. Music in the Park Council discussed this issue at length. They considered possible funding options and the number of events which might be held. Councilor Hunt advised he wanted to make funding available so the committee sponsoring this program could make plans for the summer. After some discussion, Councilor Hunt withdrew a motion he had made (seconded by Councilor Scheckla) to allocate$5,000 to the City Administrator to provide temporary facilities for the summer. Mayor Nicoll and individual Councilors noted they were in agreement with the concept of the Music in the Park program. It was decided that Council would delay action until June 13, 1995. In the interim, staff will be meeting with the committee members, at which time details and a proposal will be prepared for Council review. b. Tualatin River Watershed Council Council considered membership on the newly formed Tualatin River Watershed Council at the May 23, 1995, Council meeting. At that meeting, Councilors Hunt and Scheckla advised they were not in support Mayor Nicoll and Councilor Hawley had advised they would support membership. Councilor Rohif was not present at the May 23 meeting; therefore, Council decided to delay final consideration of this item until the May 30 meeting in order to obtain comments from Councilor Rohif. City Administrator Monahan summarized this agenda item and advised he supported membership on the Watershed Council. This Council will provide a central source of information on current research and activities related to the health and management of the Watershed. tt also would provide a forum for coordinating the research and activities of the large number of agencies and organizations involved in watershed protection. Councilor Rohif advised he saw no reason not to be involved. He noted that if dollars would be requested at a later time,then Council could discuss future participation at that point The majority consensus of Council was to approve membership on the Tualatin River Watershed Council. (Note: Mayor Nicoli and Councilors Hawley and Rohif supported membership; Councilors Hunt and Scheckla were against membership.) CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 30, 1995 - PAGE 9 • c. MPAC Membership Council nominated Mayor Nicoll as a candidate to serve as the alternate Washington County cities delegate to the Metro Policy Advisory Committee. d. 1-5/217 Interchange Mayor Nicoli updated the work to date on the 1-5/217 interchange. He advised four to five new designs for the intersection have been identified. Funding will be a problem. The proposals identified will take approximately $11 million dollars more than what funds are available. Mayor Nicoli noted the proposed improvements could probably be built in two phases. In addition, fees for the consultant will be more than originally anticipated; Tigard has paid$1Z500, so far, as their share. It may be necessary for the different agencies involved to provide in-house assistance; (i.e., printing and mailings); in order to avoid paying more dollars in consultant fees. Mayor Nicoll noted that within two to three weeks maps identifying options will be available. These options address the problems that the Cities of Lake Oswego and Tigard had with the previous 'Phoenix Plan offered by the Oregon Department of Transportation. It was noted that the East CIT will be getting an update on this issue at their next meeting. City Administrator Monahan noted that to date, residents from the Lake Oswego area have dominated the attendance at open house sessions offered by the planners of the project. He advised he would like to see more Tigard people attend these meetings. e. Tigard Triangle Transportation Plan Review A meeting will take place next week as was announced by Mayor Nicoll at the beginning of the meeting. Mayor Nicoll noted he did not think the State Highway Department will oppose what Tigard plans to do in the Triangle. In looking at the incremental change between what is currently zoned in the proposed Comprehensive Plan and what the changes would offer, Mayor Nicoll reported that Mr. Warner, Region 1 Director of ODOT, appeared to be willing to acknowledge that this was an incremental change they could live with. In addition, Mayor Nicoll noted Tigard would not have to find funding for everything. Council briefly discussed what would occur at the meeting on June 6. Single-family homeowners and other property owners need to be advised of the Oregon Department of Transportation's role as Tigard considers zone changes. tt may be that if Tigard proceeds with zone changes, then CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 30, 1995 - PAGE 10 • • additional time will be needed to put those changes in place. Council discussed the need to give this information to the residents so they are aware of why the process is moving slower now. The benefits to derive at the June 6 meeting would include identification of options available in the Triangle, assist the property owners and residents to understand what the problems are, and to ask.the Oregon Department of Transportation to give a presentation to the meeting participants. In addition, the possibility of forming a committee or task force for this area comprised of interested persons was briefly considered. It was noted the meeting on June 6 would be conducted as an informational meeting, with no Council deliberation scheduled. f. Tigard Feed and Seed Store A meeting of interested parties will occur on May 31, 1995 at Tigard City Hall at 5:30 p.m. g. Counal discussed the possibility of receiving transportation impact fee funds (TIF) from the City of Durham. Durham may be willing to contribute some funds toward the traffic signal at 79th and Durham. The City of Durham has few projects they can identify to utilize their TIF funds, and because the school is adjacent to the City and serves children from their City, it may be possible that these TIF funds can be used to help put in the traffic signal. 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Cancelled 8. ADJOURNMENT: 10:14 p.m. (A.) Attest Catherine Wheatley, City Recorde M. • , City of Tigard Date: 6 tA? x.95 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 30, 1995 - PAGE 11 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTIO'' ') x%19 FILE NO: CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON FILE TITLE: ANDREWS MANAGEMENT . APPLICANT: Andrews Management OWNER: Arthur & Margaret Verharen 4000 SW Kruse Way Place 12435 SW 60th Building 1, Suite 270 Portland, OR 97219 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 OWNER: Paul & Anna Herberholz OWNER: McGuire, Robert/William/James/Thomas 8400 SW Pfaffle Street Powell, Sarah Tigard, OR 97223 8470 SW Pfaffle Street Tigard, OR 97223 OWNER: Oregon Department of Transportation Region 1/Property Management Office 5320 SW Macadam Portland, OR 97201 REQUEST: To amend the Comprehensive Plan Map from C-P (Commercial Professional) and Low-Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential, and to change the zoning from C-P and R-4.5 to R-25. LOCATION: South of SW Pfaffle Street at SW 83rd Avenue (WCTM 1S1 36CC, tax lots 200, 300, 400 and 2,200). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:Comprehensive Plan Policies 2, 6, 8 and 12; Community Development Code Chapters 18.22, 18.32 and 18.56 and the change or mistake quasi-judicial plan map amendment criteria of the comprehensive plan (policy 1.1.2) and community development code (18.22.040). ZONE: Currently, two parcels (3.44 acres) are C-P and two parcels (2.07 acres) are R-4.5. The C-P zone allows groups of businesses and offices in centers to provide opportunities for employment and for business and professional services. The R-4.5 district allows single-family residential units, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, family day care, and home occupations among other uses. CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request PHONE NUMBER: (503) DECISION MAKING BODY STAFF DECISION X PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: 4/17/95 TIME: 7:30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 X CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: 5/23/95 TIME: 7:30 RELATIVE COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN NARRATIVE X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Ray Valone (503) 639-4171 x336 CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 ANDER9S1 MANAGEMENT March 16,1995 ii I dowt .s174,„ mit 4(3,4 li-zpi-/ 43: CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/ZONE CHANGE/ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. IP 95-Q4!*( 2a v( ,?5_00O2 OTHER CASE NO'S: /// RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION ACCEP ED BY: //j/f Imo'\ DATE: '2 /7 G 1. GENERAL INFORMATIONApplic�ati•n e ements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION SGu r1Lc 4 L 6 application form (1) Sc r](4 L — T`- .4 5 /4- 11 I Owner's signature/written FAX LOT NO. T 9f' authorization TAX MAP AND r�k to-r ��j � J �� �Z�> f S I 7�GC ` I 1,--"--(C-3--Applicant's statement SITE SIZE S•�1 A .."(G4'P�' ,� (pre-app check list) PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* 342...e._ 4'7j{G / J (D) Filing fee ($_72,7 .00) ADDRESS Loti $' PHONE ---' Additional information for Compre- CITY % afil ZIP sive Plan Map Amendments/Zone Changes APPLICANT* S / E?& {I t j l .Ui(1,r i E) Maps indicating property ADDRESS -(5 i5 i(l Li 024 PHONE -E location (pre-app check list) CITY , ) 7J ZIP q721 144 (F) List of property owners and *When the owner pp r and the applicant are different addresses within 250 feet (1) people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record (/(G) Assessor's Map (1) or a leasee in possession with written authorization (�)- Title transfer instrument (1) from the owner or an agent of the owner with written _- �'= ) ie , . L Fs authorization. The owner(s) must sign this !/ 1-�M0''�r 'i application in the space provided on page two or a � S / � i :/ • s ' ( j submit a written authorization with this application. DATE E ERMINED TO BE CO'PLE 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: request a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (if COMP. P ��N✓ DESIGNATI� : l � applicable) from- P 4 R4.s to -�5' and a Zone Change from <..-p r / 4,j- to -25; r5;/--ic—a-5 -Number: OR The applicant requests an amendment to the Planning Commission Approval Date: following sections of the Comprehensive Plan or Community Development Code /(/,Q City Council Approval Date: 0737P/23P Rev'd: 5/87 i • 3. List any variance, conditional uses, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: 0741C., 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S)• SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants - so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this / 7 day of 19 775 SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. 4.4l4A=---)4(2 (KSL:pm/0737P) Memorandum To: MARK ROBERTS From: SPENCER H. VAIL Date: February 14, 1995 Subject: ZONE CHANGE AND PLAN AMENDMENT SW PFAFFLE SITE MARK ATTACHED PLEASE FIND 1." COMPLETED APPLICATION FORM ✓AUTHORIZATION FROM THE PROPERTY OWNERS OF THE FOUR PROPERTIES INVOLVED. A COPY OF THE PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES AFFIIDAVIT OF MAILING (V AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING a.� MINUTES OF NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING L/ 20 COPIES OF THE SITE PLAN /20 COPIES OF THE WRITTEN SUPPORT DOCUMENT 5 COPIES OF THE I ITTELSON TRAFFIC ANALYSIS NENSWI. •PENCER VAIL O PLAI1101ING CONSULTANT RECEIVED MAR 1 51995 March 13 , 1995 COMMUNITY OENEL4 PMEiNiT Ray Valone, Associate Planner Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Plan Amendment and Zone Change Request by Andrews Management--SW Pfaffle Road site Dear Ray Your March 6, 1995 letter requested additional details concerning two Comprehensive Plan Policies, specifically 1.1. 2 and 12. 1. 3 as they related to the above referenced application. The following has been compiled to address your concerns. Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.1.2 "requires that in order to approve a quasi-judicial amendment to the plan, the city must find that the change is consistent with applicable plan policies, that a change in physical circumstances has occurred since the original designation or there is evidence of a change in the neighborhood or community which affects the subject property. Alternatively, the city must find that a mistake was made in the original designation." COMMENT: The portion of the subject site now zoned C-P has no direct access to SW Pacific Hwy. It does not have good visibility from the highway. Trips to any commercial business activity would be required to use SW. Pfaffle to get to the site. This would draw commercial traffic through a predominately residential area. That portion of the subject site now zone R4.5, low density residential, no longer meets the locational criteria set forth in the Plan document. It abuts Pacific Highway on the south and the commercially zoned lot on the southwest corner of SW Hall and Pfaffle. 4505 N.E. 24TH AVENUE • PORTLAND, OREGON 97211 • 503/281-8245 • FAX 503/284-5506 4. v 111 . Ray Valone Andrews Mgmt site page 2 New apartment development has occurred on the corner of SW Hall and Pfaffle. This is not indicative of an area "committed to low density development" . Based on the above, a mistake can be said to have been made in the original Plan designation for these properties. There are terrain differences and access problems which separate these lots from the other commercial zones and business activities fronting on SW Pacific highway. Surrounding features such as Hall Blvd. and Pacific Highway as well being adjacent to commercial zones takes the R4.5 lots out of an area committed to low density development. Comprehensive Plan Policy 12.1.3 Locational Criteria for Medium-High Density Residential COMMENT: The location criteria are covered by this Policy. Generally, under the INTRODUCTION portion of the Policy statement, contained on page II-77 of the Plan document, it is stated that the locational criteria are intended to be construed in a flexible manner. Proposals that are found to be in the public interest and capable of harmonious integration into the community satisfy the intent of the Policy statement. The subject request does not technically satisfy tow of the eight location criteria listed. These two criteria are: (3) Areas which have direct access from a major collector or arterial COMMENT: This zone change area does not have a direct access to a major collector or arterial . SW Pfaffle is classified as a minor collector by the City. The property in question, however, is within 250' of SW Hall Blvd. , an Arterial street according to the City's Transportation Map. The Kittelson Traffic Analysis indicates that the amount of traffic to be generated by the proposed Plan Amendment and Zone Change area, even if developed to the maximum allowable density, will be less traffic than if developed with uses permitted under current zoning. Less traffic will mean less impact on the existing residential development along SW Pfaffle. The additional residential development that would • . Ray Valone Andrews Mgmt site page 3 result from the applicant's proposal be more in keeping with the residential character along this portion of SW Pfaffle than would in intrusion of commercial activities. Strict adherence to this Policy is not warranted in this instance. (8) Areas adjacent to either private or public permanent open space. Comment: There are no open space adjacent to the site. There is, however, an excellent transporta- tion system that will allow residents of the proposed development easy access to the City's park system and other recreation activities. The flexibility of this criteria is noted where other R-25 zoned areas exist in the City without adjacent open space. Strict compliance with this Policy does not appear warranted. Thank you for your attention to this request. Very truly yours _ Pncer H. Vail • • s March 6, 1995 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Spencer H. Vail 4505 NE 24th Avenue Portland, OR 97211 Dear Mr. Vail: This letter is in response to the application materials submitted for Andrews Management to initiate a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change on four parcels in the City of Tigard. Staff have concluded that more detail is needed concerning some of the applicable criteria in order to make the required findings. The following items are of concern to the planning department: • Comprehensive Plan policy 1. 1.2: This policy _requires that the city must find that a change of physical circumstances has occurred since the original designation or a mistake was made in the original land use designation of the affected propert(ies) . The applicant's statements regarding this criterion on pages 5, 6 and 11 of the support document are insufficient for adequate staff review and city action on the proposed amendment/zone change. A more detailed argument should be made for changing both the R-4.5 and C-P districts. • Comprehensive Plan policy 12 . 1. 3 : Technically, two of the eight criteria under subheading A of this policy are not met by the proposal. The affected properties do not have direct access from a major collector or arterial street (item (3) ) , and the proposed area is not adjacent to private or public permanent open space (item (8) ) . All locational criteria can be construed in a flexible manner, however, if the proposal is found to be in the public interest and capable of harmonious integration into the community [see Tigard Comprehensive Plan, page II-77] . For this reason, the applicant may wish to make an argument that due to the degree of change and impact on the community, the proposed land use change does not warrant strict conformance to all locational criteria. Please call me at 639-4171 to discuss this letter. Sincerely, Ray Valone Associate Planner 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 A • n •• DEPARTMENT OF January 6, 1995 TRANSPORTATION REG 1 PORTLAND R/W OFFICE Property Management FILE CODE: Tigard Planning Department File: R-32774 City Hall 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 To whom it may concern: Please be advised that the undersigned, as a representative of the Oregon Department of Transportation, which is the owner of the property described as 1 S 1 36CC TL 02200, Washington County, OR., agree to authorize the inclusion of said property in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change being proposed by Andrews Management. Sincerely yours, faeect,7/7( David Manus Property Agent iv 5320 SW Macadam Portland, OR 97201 (503) 229-5277 734-1962(2-94) FAX (503) 229-5939 ' Oigon DEPARTMENT OF January 6, 1995 TRANSPORTATION REG 1 PORTLAND R/W OFFICE Property Management FILE CODE: Spencer Vail Land Use Planning& Development 4505 N.E. 24th Portland, OR 97211 Dear Mr. Vail: Please find enclosed the letter to the City of Tigard Planning Department, regarding the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change. If you have any other questions, please feel free to call me at 229-5274. Sincerely, x ' David Manus Property Agent 'r✓ 5320 SW Macadam Portland, OR 97201 (503) 229-5277 734-1962(2-94) FAX (503) 229-5939 MINUTES OF MEETING The meeting began shortly after 7:00 pm on January 13 , 1995. In addition to the applicant's representatives, there were 10 people in attendance. See the attached sign up sheet. Spencer Vail, Planning Consultant for the applicant Andrews Management began by giving an overview of the project. A preliminary site plan and an aerial photo of the vicinity were put of as reference materials. Mr. Vail then asked for questions from the audience. The questions covered the following areas of concern: 1. Safety for children and other pedestrians on SW Pfaffle Rd. 2. Additional information on the proposed apartment complex that included a breakdown on the number of bedrooms, parking spaces and rental price 3 . Request for a sound barrier between applicant's property and TL 400 4. Information on timing of project, ie construction period, when to be developed. 5. Did Andrews Management have control of any other property in the zone change area and if so, what development plan were proposed. Mr. Vail responded to these questions. Attendees were then asked to come forward to get a closer look at the site plan and aerial photo and to have informal conversations with Mr. Vail and /or the developer and project designer, Mr. Naff. Mr. Vail distributed his business card and urged anyone who may have additional questions to call him. Meeting adjourned at 8: 30 pm. 1• gq_5- flaoc, Su) F3 96,Mrafs< (2c 7 -riA- to 0.1:4 TI-176 -51/0- Ppier-pz.‘ A=;ei ./ • /06I 13enef-i7 g530 as 34) su) Pcc, 11 e/1/13y oce-A y 7/2__ 7 s w c9 sG, r-1 / / . // 76s--- s --- Vead •ZzAr/er g55- e .1 .1 11 :11 !! if • 111 January 5 , 1995 Tigard Planning Department City Hall 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 To Whom It May Concern: - Please be advised that the undersigned, owners of property described as 1S1 36CC TL 00200 agree to and authorize the inclusion of said property in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change being proposed by Andrews Management , Ltd. Very truly yours , CST R W. V' -c=-N VeAievr-nt Name of Deedholder Signature 1\1\tkfkGek m C . V Name of Deedholder Sig e CEI\TIGARD. 200 • • January 5 , 1995 • Tigard Planning Department City Hall 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that the undersigned, owners of property described as 1S1 36CC TL 00300 agree to and authorize the inclusion of said property in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change being proposed by Andrews Management, Ltd. Very truly yours , e5i&i Name of eed older Signature -A AI Ai 1--16 R L3 L z Name of Deedholder Signature • CEI\TIGARD. 300 ga e /X1 � . N January 5 , 1995 Tigard Planning Department City Hall 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that the undersigned, owners of property described as 1S1 36CC TL 00400 agree to and authorize the inclusion of said property in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change being proposed by Andrews Management, Ltd. Very truly yours Name of Deedholder .ignatprf ksiym—r2.KJ thc- --f41(2‘ -4Ldtw' Name of Deedholder Signaturelv SQ.,-fit A . Ths)ow Name of Deedholder Si•nature N A me Name of Deedholder -ign. ture AiL"--- CEI\TIGARD. 400 - a COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE APPLICANT: Andrews Management 4000 SW Kruse Way Place Building #1 Suite 270 Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 REPRESENTATIVE: Spencer H. Vail , Planning Consultant 4505 NE 24th Ave Portland, Oregon 97211 DEEDHOLDERS: Arthur and Margaret Verharen (TL 200) Paul Herberholz et al (TL 300) Tom McGuire et. at (TL 400) Oregon Dept. of Transportation (TL 2200) SITE LOCATION: South side of SW Pfaffle, at SW 83rd See Exhibit 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tax Lots 200, 300, 400 and 2200; 1S1 36 CC SITE SIZE: 5.51 acres ZONING: C-P, Commercial Professional and R-4. 5 single family residential. See Exhibit 2 . ]AP NUMBER: 1S1 36 CC PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change from the current C-P Commercial-Professional and R-4 .5, single family residential to R-25 , Multi-family Residential for the properties listed above. • • Andrews Management Plan Amendment and Zone Change SW Pfaffle site DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL: The applicant, Andrews Management, proposes to develop Tax Lot 200 and the southerly portion of Tax Lot 300 with a 76 unit apartment complex to be called the "Carriage House Apartments" . There will be 36 two bedroom units and 40 one bedroom units in 6 two story building. The Code required 132 parking spaces are provided. Access is to SW Pfaffle via a driveway along the westerly portion of the site. There are no specific plans to build additional apartment units on the remainder of the zone change property. These other properties were included within the zone change area because the conclusions derived from the information presented below will show that the R-25 zone is the most reasonable zone for this area. Retention of any R-4 .5 zoned land on the south side of SW Pfaffle is not supported by these conclusions. See the site plan submitted as well as Exhibit 3 , a reduction of the site plan, for a depiction of the above described layout as well as Exhibit 2 which shows the current zoning. SITE DESCRIPTION: Tax Lot 200, a 2.55 acre parcel, is undeveloped. Tax lot 300 contains a single family home on the northerly portion of the site. The southerly one-half on the lot is included in the proposed apartment complex. A 158' by 158' lot will be provided for the house. Tax Lot 2200, the ODOT parcel , is vacant. No private development can occur on this site until it is declared surplus property by ODOT and standard sales procedures are completed. Tax lot 400 contains a single family home. There are no current redevelopment proposals for this site. 2 • Andrews Management Plan Amendment and Zone Change SW Pfaffle site SURROUNDING AREA: To the west of the subject site and in zone C-P, is a single family home and a cellular telephone monopole. These are located on Tax Lots 1000,1100 and 1200. To the south of the zone change area is Highway 217. To the north of the site, and across SW Pfaffle in the R-7 zone are single family homes. At the intersection of Pfaffle and Hall Blvd in a newer apartment complex called the Gatehouse Apartments. To the east and adjacent to the subject site is the General Motors Training Facility. TRAFFIC STUDY: The applicant retained the services of Kittelson and Associates to conduct a Traffic Impact Analysis for the rezoning proposal . This report is enclosed as Exhibit 4 . The report examines the traffic impact of not only the applicant's proposed 76 unit apartment project but also the impact given full build out of the zone change area. In summary, the report makes the following findings and recommendations: * The proposed apartment complex (137 units) will generate 885 daily trips, of which 70 trips will be during the typical weekday a.m. peak hour and 85 trips during the p.m. peak hour. * All intersections within the study area currently operate at acceptable levels of service, with the exception of the weekday p.m. hour forced flow conditions that occur at the SW 78th Avenue/SW Pfaffle Street intersection. * The proposed apartment zoning for the site will result in 480 fewer trips on 3 • • Andrews Management Plan Amendment and Zone Change SW Pfaffle site the transportation system that if the site were developed under the current commercial-professional and single family residential zoning. * There is a sight distance problem at the SW Hall Blvd/SW Pfaffle Street intersection: however, accident data from this location does nor reflect an unusually high incidence of accidents, and the development of this site is not expected to worsen the already existing condition. * The study area intersection and the proposed site driveway will operate at acceptable levels of service under the 1996 full buildout conditions, with the exception of the SW 78th/SW Pfaffle. This intersection will operate at forced flow conditions; however, the proposed development will have minimal impacts on the operation and safety of the SW 78th/SW Pfaffle intersection. * The proposed apartment development, with its sidewalk network connecting the building, should not have any internal circulation problems. ZONING CODE REOUIREMENTS: CURRENT ZONING: COMMERCIAL-PROFESSIONAL The C-P zoning district allows a variety of business and office type uses as specified in Chapter 18.64 . R-4.5 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL The R-4. 5 zone is a low density single family residential zone. Single family homes are allowed on 7500 sq.ft. lots and duplexes are allowed on 10,000 sq.ft. lots. Chapter 18.50 sets forth the specifics for development in the zone. 4 Andrews Management Plan Amendment and Zone Change SW Pfaffle site PROPOSED ZONING: R-25 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL The R-25 zone is a Medium High Density multiple-family residential zone providing for a density of 25 units per acre. The provisions contained in Chapter 18 .64 govern development in the zone. PLAN AMENDMENT REQUEST: Chapter 18.22 deals Comprehensive Plan Amendments. The subject request is considered to be a Quasi-Judicial request. Section 18.22.040 lists the standards upon which an approval of Plan Amendment requests must be based. Following is a listing of these standards and the applicant's response thereto: (1) "The applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designation and; the change will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the community": Comment: Following are the Comprehensive Plan Polices deemed applicable to this request and the applicant's responses thereto: Plan Policy 1.1.2 requires that in order to approve a quasi-judicial amendment to the plan, the city must find that the change is consistent with applicable plan policies, that a change in physical circumstances has occurred since the original designation or there is evidence of a change in the neighborhood or community which affects the subject property. Alternatively, the city must find that a mistake was made in the original designation COMMENT: The portion of the subject site now zoned C-P has no direct access to SW Pacific Hwy. It does not have good visibility from the highway. Trips to any commercial business activity would be 5 • • Ray Valone Andrews Mgmt site page 3 required to use SW. Pfaffle to get to the site. This would draw commercial traffic through a predominately residential area. That portion of the subject site now zone R4 .5, low density residential , no longer meets the locational criteria set forth in the Plan document. It abuts Pacific Highway on the south and the commercially zoned lot on the southwest corner of SW Hall and Pfaffle. New apartment development has occurred on the corner of SW Hall and Pfaffle. This is not indicative of an area "committed to low density development" . Based on the above, a mistake can be said to have been made in the original Plan designation for these properties. There are terrain differences and access problems which separate these lots from the other commercial zones and business activities fronting on SW Pacific highway. Surrounding features such as Hall Blvd. and Pacific Highway as well being adjacent to commercial zones takes the R4.5 lots out of an area committed to low density development. Plan Policy 2.1.1 states that the City shall maintain an on-going citizen involvement program and that citizens will have an opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process. Comment: The applicant held a meeting for the area residents and property owners as well as other interested parties on January 13 , 1995. The mailing list, notification letter, sign up sheet and minutes of the meeting as well as the required affidavits, have been submitted to the City with this application and are part of the record. 6 • Ray Valone Andrews Mgmt site page 3 This policy has been followed thus far and will be in the future. Also, comments made at the meeting with respect to increased traffic, pedestrian safety were adressed in the Kittelson Report and the City requirement that sidewalks be installed along the SW Pfaffle frontage. Plan Policy 6.1.1 states that the City shall provide an opportunity for a diversity of housing densities and residential types at various price and rent levels. Comment: The designation of the subject properties to the R-25 zone will allow for the immediate construction of 76 apartment units and create the potential for an additional 61 units. This density will add to the City's housing stock and contribute to the various residential types and rent levels envisioned by this Policy. Such a rezoning will not adversely affect the City's overall residential density. Plan Policy 8.1.1 states that the City shall plan for a safe and efficient street system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. Comment: SW Pfaffle is designated as a minor collector. According the Kittelson Traffic study submitted with this request, the proposed plan amendment can be made without adversely affecting the level of service or safety. The installation of sidewalks and full service driveway with adequate view corridors will part of the proposed 76 unit development proposed by the applicant. 7 S • Ray Valone Andrews Mgmt site page 3 Policy 12.1 lists the location criteria for the various residential zones. In the "INTRODUCTION" portion of the Policy statement, contained on page II-77 of the Plan document, it is stated that the locational criteria are intended to be construed in a flexible manner. Proposals that are found to be in the public interest and capable of harmonious integration into the community satisfy the intent of the Policy statement. The applicable zones and criteria for this request are: 12.1.1 Low density residential exists within the subject area on TL's 300 and 400 . There is a single family dwelling on each lot with lot areas in excess of the minimum. The lots from on a minor collector, have all urban services available and have historically be used for low density development. The locational criteria are met. 12.1.3 Medium-High Density Residential is the proposed land use designation. The subject proposal satisfies the following location criteria: (1) The subject area contains a vacant parcel and two single family homes on large lots. This area along the south side of SW Pfaffle is not committed to low density development (2) new multi - family development can provide adequate buffering to minimize the impact on the low density residential developments on the north side of SW Pfaffle. 8 • Ray Valone Andrews Mgmt site page 3 (3) This zone change area does not have a direct access to a major collector or arterial. SW Pfaffle is classified as a minor collector by the City. The property in question, however, is within 250' of SW Hall Blvd. , an Arterial street according to the City's Transportation Map. The Kittelson Traffic Analysis indicates that the amount of traffic to be generated by the proposed Plan Amendment and Zone Change area, even if developed to the maximum allowable density, will be less traffic than if developed with uses permitted under current zoning. Less traffic will mean less impact on the existing residential development along SW Pfaffle. The additional residential development that would result from the applicant's proposal be more in keeping with the residential character along this portion of SW Pfaffle than would in intrusion of commercial activities. Strict adherence to this Policy is not warranted in this instance. (4) There are no known development limitations on this site. (5) urban services in the area are capable of serving the proposed development. 9 • • Ray Valone Andrews Mgmt site page 3 Additional right-of-way will be dedicated and sidewalks installed as part of the proposed development. (6) There is Public Transit available on SW Pacific Highway. (7) The site is within 1/4 mile of the commercial areas along SW Pacific Highway. (8) There are no open space adjacent to the site. There is, however, an excellent trans- portation system that will allow residents of the proposed development easy access to the City's park system and other recreation activities. The flexibility of this criteria is noted where other R-25 zoned areas exist in the City without adjacent open space. Strict compliance with this Policy does not appear warranted. Policy 12.2 lists the locational and other criteria for the various commercial zones. The applicable zone and its criteria are: 12.2.3 Commercial Professional This zone is intended for a diverse range of office and support uses and to promote convenience throughout the City. 12.2.3.A(1-3)Scale --The trade area, site size and gross leasable area vary. There are no minimums or maximums cited in this Policy. 10 . • Ray Valone Andrews Mgmt site page 3 12.2.3.B--Locational Criteria (1) Spacing and Location Comment: The site is surrounded by residential on two sides, the north and west. (2) Access Comment: The existing C- P zone exists on property with no frontage or direct access to SW Pacific Highway. No commercial development has been proposed in the site since the C-P zone was established . Customers of any business to locate on the site would have a difficult and circuitous route to get to the business. Traffic would, by necessity, be directed into a residential area. The Kittelson Report states that there will be less traffic for the proposed apartment uses than with development at the existing zoning designations of C-P and R-4.5. (3) Site Characteristics Comment: Visibility of the site is not sufficient as far as traffic counts, frontage and accessibility. These issues were 11 • • Ray Valone Andrews Mgmt site page 3 discussed above. Topography is such that the subject site is above the level of Pacific Highway and hidden from view of the passing motorist. (4) Impact Assessment Comment: The area to the north is developed with single family homes and a recently constructed apartment complex. The Kittelson Report indicates a lesser traffic impact from the proposed multiple-family designation than from existing zoning. T h e intrusion on non- residential uses allowed by the C-P zone could adversely impact this area. (2) "The statewide planning goals adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197, until acknowledgment of the comprehensive plan and ordinances;" Comment: The City's plan has been officially acknowledged by the State. This criteria is satisfied. (3) "The applicable standards of any provision of this code or other applicable impending ordinance; and" Comment: The site will be subject to the standards contained in Code Section 18. 56, the R-25 zone. The use being proposed is a Permitted Use in the zone. 12 • • Ray Valone Andrews Mgmt site page 3 Additionally, the property in question meets or exceeds all the dimensional standards of the zone. No Variances are being requested. The proposed site plan has been developed in accordance with Code requirements. The residence situated on the northerly portion will remain of a parcel meeting or exceeding Code minimums for a single family home in the R-25 zone. All new development in the zone change area will be subject to the Site Development Review process. This criteria is satisfied. (4) "Evidence of change in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to the property which is the subject of the development application." Comment: A review of the location criteria and other Comprehensive Plan Policies cited above beginning at page 5 indicate that a mistake could have been made when the current zoning was originally adopted for the subject site. Development has not occurred according to the current zones and other development This criteria is satisfied. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING RULE Oregon Revised Statutes OAR 660-12-060, Division 12 , Transportation Planning Rule applies to this type of application. The following standards for amendments to Comprehensive Plans are deeded to be applicable to this request. (1) Amendments to (a) Comprehensive Plans, functional plans and land use regulations which significantly affect a 13 • • Ray Valone Andrews Mgmt site page 3 transportation facility shall assure that the allowed uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity and level of service of the transportation facility (b) Amending the TSP (Transportation System Plan) to provide transportation facilities adequate to support the proposed land uses consistent with the requirements of this division and (c) Altering land use requirements to reduce demand for automobile travel and meet travel needs through other modes. Comment: SW Pfaffle is designated as a minor arterial by the City. The requested land use actions do not propose to change the functional classification of the street. This criteria is satisfied. (2) A land use regulation amendment significantly affects the transportation facility is it: (a) changes the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility. (b) changes a standard implementing a transportation system; (c) allows types of levels of travel or access which are inconsistent with the transportation facility or (d) would be below the minimum acceptable level identified in the TSP. Comment: The Kittelson report concludes that the proposed plan amendment and zone 14 i • Ray Valone Andrews Mgmt site page 3 change, even at maximum potential development of 176 apartment units, will not significantly affect the level of service on SW Pfaffle. In fact, the report concludes that the proposed R-25 development will have less of an impact than if the area were developed under existing zoning. This criteria is satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: All applicable Code criteria for the requested Plan Amendment and Zone Change have been satisfied as specified in the above information. The request should be approved as submitted. An analysis of the Kittleson Report indicates minimal impact of the transportation system, the properties can be developed as proposed within the existing development standards of the Code and without significant adverse impact on surrounding properties. Specific details of new development can be addressed in the required Site Development Review process. shv/me 2/13/95 as revised 3/14/95 15 I • 0 • • - - - i 500 _ 70' 131.6E -, 1.5/At. 11 I 3200 ttl 3 33 13 4 CI 14 '— — — _ L __ — 1+ J , 4 _ Cn 133 Z • ���ffT" _ 61"16 I 2 2+ 6200 k I800 / CV 2200 ' V l�l TOO _ -- I. • 3100 t�� 9 34 `� : o LK i al no 13326 3 A 14 w3 7 3"23 _ .. ..-. - 2296 n• • 6300 • 890 900 35 iik 1900 i:35AC 0364e. 3000 a . 2100 S 161 2 . N N403_W p `�—4^15 4 t �y a� ma „ • •�r Fs E lie 63 $ 6400 (zoo 1 15 CO '2 70� f . N .009•.006'W .__-- — 0 • I ;' W- i 2900 t es 10 =g 36 nS 37 = 2000 S t - 1900 am m ,(u,w ' 1 I ITIAI Pf. T 1 r . . J Ts.20 136"x6 3627 b %. •33 _ d I• U) 1�I uwr+iiu« vv t nr ruir+�,.Y ..1x1.9x . ..6 et.ae 1 se 1 • ad ar•s137 p s9-.2166 - Y: a w:•zz.,/,• L 0a-33333 i .K- 7 p: 9i r .Q N eE°sT 30 M 31 c6a ., •• .."'••. -14 4-- --- SW -L. C.R. JPFAFFLE FP S.W. PFAFFIEE"-SST / r _ s.r xf c 631.33 .AG .25.40 - ...,:+. _ 00 f : 300 200 I00 ^ --,,e2 .82 L25Ac. 2.5SAc 1 ' X 20.-I b 1rKE /�1_. 9 45. °` A 9rX RE4 .. ..4 :.,...;kir,:".0-...,.. .-.:,.7...e::.:'-,: f• '....‘if( '' ' • • ,x07/4.,. ° .. .". 6624• '--- 1 ease _ ao a s 36.1. • ___ _7,,'• 0 e' C F,9` 2200 -P= _ _ / .89 Ac. i•:': FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY i/ P0>O DO NOT RELY ON FOR ANY OTHER USE - ,c'o • EXHIBIT 1 IN I I O '''-i— ". ::,....-4:1...:••• .s.,,,'...i..!.:::' ,•!'•z'...:."..2.r,'':::•:..•••:::!...,..;'..i...•.:!.,::-.:1?,.••..c..,..%).1. _ . . cv . Nz. „,. ...: , .?„..... • „ .../ .. ... ........ ....:1:.,...„....„:„..::,:.F.,.. • , PI H / , a , •„.••.....,• ..,,,.....„.„.„,.....„,,,..:.:,:„.,,,,•„,,i.T.A.1'.1".1....''''•''''''' " I''/:...V ' t ./..etet...,. .... ,5,,, 1 ..,.....,...•.W..•..:';Ac...1','Ii..r'..:., i 0 t g, N **;A:41:0,114''..% '...( %;'204..LC•i, 1';L1:,.-,n...;..1...5,. ... C1 '';',.1i:vi.,.:44-. ilv" . 1:,,.0.:q. .4.s.,.,A.;':•; 0.,...:Jf.s.,•:,-,.j• ,:-i:;:. . I 1..%,,P,V". A.til. g 4{t.411,4".*',.:',.:'.,`!.;• :'.;',,..k,"..c Z .JAVr■IIV'4.12 .''" tkarik:17,14;'...,;';'7:'./:...::i.i"4,; • ..•...ieir :1'. 1110n MINIM ■ t,.... - tAi • , la' s'i ' 1:,*).!1';'''.1C1.`1 ..i.efitn-..1;.‘;'....".■'' •i •••,"V /1.1:".1', . . ,/ . ".4:t4•14V,64,716:1;.", '.?.?,11.•,. 1 i'•,_M t.r, 11;11,t4tli Vir IVT.11,1141 immillin 4. • 1 V Yi,.,.I'e:C.;;7.1.4."4.4i :411.T0104; ... ,,..,..: ,:........,,.. r,, /11/•11■1111111111111 mem".., ii, iiiilat 1- i,:qt,c,f,(44.fits,,,l'Aft". • •... 12-.....n ,;111, .. in siging.iNin shy ...1. ih, Iiiiiii,.... ,.„..„,,,, .• ,.., .,,,.....,...„,.:..,..:,....,,,.,....„. .,,,,...„..„:„„.::,",....,,....,..,.,,,. .. ..,..,,,,,,.. • .•• . . • " . • III/ •,,, .....:. 41,..,„,•„.. ,-id,yry....v....,..2,:s.. • A Wjilltil..4 3111111,11111 ilk Illw ,.::.,..,..,..,...!..:..:,...,..1..:..;7 e.11 r -,..i., ,,,• ,..- • • ........,•,.•:„...:.,....„....„...„.., ..,,,,,.., ..-P:;• aii al I■me MEI • ,., , .....,,...,..„...:::!. •,....,14t, 1,,a,..i.:.,,,-.L.46; .`Ni!I ..•.......::•.,..........,....;.,..4....:.,.6.::,...N.,.:1. .1.‘. ..., ....,1 • . _ q iiimilts75„2 .. . . • ....:„.:.,,,:„„,„,„,...:,;:vi:;...,..:,,m so, ..!!,,A;;;;,•„7? . ... ot\., ;,;;.•,:-:.!•sy:::..,,•::,:.1,:-..1..i.R....,i...:,:./.,.:....... P;;'7.jj,1'.,!.•-•• 4+C.10;' ,.. Nil° VII*' IIII ;!..;;.!:::?;(::.:':;:i.;,:. .0.,...;:;,),:;::::::: ;.'l.,::. .'' . -• .... ...:.,....:.:....,;•.,;4;.:.:k.......,L,..,::;i: .. if;;;;:;:r.:•.*:.: ::!•••". ... 11101 'MI KI1110111110 W .,...., ..,.. kill W. .4 -12 0. •••:.:::....,...,,...,„...;:;,.,:,,.,?.,,,,...;..,:.,......- ,,TT,;,.,...,. •,......-............. Ea./Iliminimmum IL 1121111Mill 1.1111111111ir < ii. ___=-", .•'. ' ,i'.:!',...::::":,■11:•";. .%;',”. Inn/ 11111111111111111111 CL ....riglal=r, )(if „...,.. ammaL---__-- ------, , ... . r ',./..! • . •••••::::,;1;-....1.: - .... .- kt. Alp' .‘• i . , , . :. • .. ., (-41:- 11111 *di Z ' IIINIMP9.1101MIMIr 11.i 0- - ---- ..14;%4:r • (Y lif sal#,, 4 dry A. s,. .r!.......: •.1:;`, qi...■ IMF LO -.1.':*4 UN -----==.---__.--•W---7. C.7 -=:------.--,--•=7"• al 1...,......7.... IR : . -C laite ... Ha511611Iw . wialail7 . la ..; • A _ f--1 ILIIMI 1,1111111 4 A11.11 (I) :---:: Lin ak .811\4■• .- I 110 ,,i 4.. . \i, , mu IF 1 nit ....6, ,\ • •,. .. „ ..,,.. i i C, Z rffillanal48S* a d< ' 4 , . NI ' MI ili12111111 x : 'be* ..0 . e9 • 1111 n L. X Z. . T fit'` _ II (rm. 1 , ,, , arre P O.__ A NI 4!‘ , Cr) li, CARR1AE HOUSE AT AIF LE PFAFFLE ROAD g I!1 j ;. ) 1 _ UNIT °vUMMARY I I ` I I 1 ■. "1 - .._ 30 'A't.6013. • 633 92.F' :^_EC'P00'1:13/4.1 . Er+ II 40 'W MRS • 6 °C•F- ,I BEC•g0011 16a T.1 V 6OTC 8' r T��• � 6'�TD 7C __°r'O`""'" L IM I 1 f 't OFF STREET PARC±NG ill cill _1 �__-- d 1 Ifi 10:0 X A;:O 0.414.60F3 ba 7 1- �' -- , s: 9:0x .5 0 0 E C•M4Lt.3 146 "I . . 11/1 . 21 9:0 x 1960 9rANDAF0 S1ALL° via MU ..-I --- r0TAL SPACES F1d�i:CEG tL9 wP.R • . • II9 LQC'F;i..FA110C4r .1/LL- 1 HI CC FT �""'._._ ._.._. AREA SUMMAR+' d d• li,• - " I rI I r {'I �iV $ 7 LOt 0:N1126SSE `:'lei 2;1.• --- 6 61G 14 >i` t P..IFKIIli AND C I•:E^ 41R-H. 1=•L CY - r. , ` AREA CF UtrC6c-,AP it_ ivw,2} a6Y. !� �F� Ifs I S C •1F •-- SITE AREA I'Ai I4 :00s. fit V7 Ti 4 iii W.ii a( ( _ / k.1 1W1 a .-- U tN11 -.7 •L:. :". i ..../ I I I I I Pi y 1/IL I 4/ �iI�� l imerio,„1_ I .1 97 k-',Ni\ r:i o h \, 4 • . • ' ... s..... •..\\.:\. .............,_ I IN. um . %:4, ilia_ sr .11: k ,,, • do* __._NO CiffERY ► - f 111 5$.) ■ I\C„...., Irillir 1 I ***L a m....,...... ..... . . . . _ i ...w__._._�_._�_•r._� PARC11q ARIA .� :1113 Ft :re 1 I F, OIAla7a1 ro1v^Ra >aaN■ CNtta • H , H . ta . . (1101.111.1111711111171116* * • 6444. .44.443 => L= dik N 4111111111 I . 400" TIMMS 1--- , a ... .... hi -;) ,,-,_, 45;7 CO T ...„....„ )1^1/4. FfiFilA, a . , .. . . ., . Hic) us a oz,,,,,wA,,F„.....a . . • • PP4FPLNE Rop4r; .7, 214.03 V . . —_ ••••••••■••■•IMM OMINIMINIMIN■■•■•010110101■111“1.•■■•010100■■••••ON•11 r as mom on asams a am=a aume us am.no TE a avemo a am.a amai Lits1 I T SUMM0:141;rr • , . .... • . I omill '111_ , A ,,, 30 "A" UNITS B 893 SQ. FT. 2 BEC>fROOM 2 BATH 40 "B" UNITS ID 626 50. FT. 1 f3EDROOM 1 BATH —. 1 -- ..- -2.22' . 6 \......, 111. -- --- ; * ell , •,.. CAR 6, STD 2C'" ----- - Ili ,,,-,., IL: , 1-',,,,,, Li--- I AAR ___ ------ _____. IF- ,, & 5TD __2c...„.. . .....__ , . * —II , —a -_,,,_ fA11.--ow/a.'''-..,„;;; 1 iTI - ---,e7N....._ ..----:.- --- .#,. _.1 OW STREET PARK IN UN tbiNiaLE PAM. ,gi ..... .... ,_ 1 , RI ....--„, 4.. _ - ..,,,............ ..... ............ L -- - , L • . Is 10/0 X 20/0 GARAGES 26% 7411 1:1:71 L -Th I ii Ili 52 9/0 X 18/0 COVERED STALLS 14% ommo. I• I 21 9/0 X 18/0 STANDARD STALLS . 39% iiii . , II — 1 34 8/0'X 16/0 COMPACT STALLS 131 TOTAL SPACES PROIVDED 49% 186% _. -1,_t_ . ._ iiiii- .II . I .....,_, I -Mill INCLUDING 5 HANDICAP STALLS i 1111 ___ milt ,_-7:::.:', I e ___ --.._. la --fi---ii- ts,...,..,:_, I AR--- Iii 4 . ... . ' r IL. ... ___ , __. . . GAR cot\ f4 — \ / • A 4 4.'+' , 15a.00 FT. \ / „ * . AREA SUMMAIZ*r- a am=a am.a seamo a maal•suraw a aurim a ammil r . . , ...._ ..._, ________ ---, ,.... ,,.,.. at , i , , : 1 4 4 6 CA GAR. , . I \ !., i_ , - -- F`' ---, ; Mt MI ! I . 0 LOT COVERAGE 30,942 22% E I I _, ___....._ - .— ----1 / \ _ PARKING AND DRIVES 41,682 Ot 30% 8 STD _---- AREA OF LANDSCAPING 66,990 4a% I/ -4-a- -Ai. ., . . . -. r iii, .. 139,614 100% g , >< --4-4,--- 311E AREA 2:26 ,,,,,.,,. S C -- ,.,----- \ *.... 11( 0 = my ...ic ,...-/0 (S..1116 CA . . _. CP IN --..,...,_ ■ 4 - 6 I N'---,. 2 -__ _ _ 10 STD i ....1 / k IL) I .....›o . 4111,— - ---1 --a :,....t., I Ili p .:-A fy ir 1,,.... _ „,.., , a . ____:. ,__ ...._ I - ...- —. , , ,r-;,—,, ..,, .,,„.„ 2 C --- 43 .1- MN L „ I ,P,ar,,... .., -..,,,,,,,, I , _ I % i it Pi v 1 . 2 I ....,„ 11■11 II 8To '— ----- - , *—4).I--A RI - : 411; 1,i/ ,4 .. .,,,,,., 2 32 67 STD 17 gi A I e:t..i., I L ..... , I s Nqk ..,.. 44 r I a -, ....- b.., - g 0 r i 4-----_ , >< _. r---- - 4 . 1 1 ° ...., i Or - '-- . , i - ...... tilL 0. Utp..._ ---, ISTO 40 1 STD i 'N‘■,u ,-.,.._. .,.. L..., ---: _ _,.. ---- .., ....- "c r ---' L * -** •-• ----• sllIllIl -a.-- ifile it -234 . ,-.....r. ir. ) ...,, S' 111 , , r I .....s.-a--...- .........., II 111 >< WM ■■■*,4 1 40, MP Erni - i 1 — i : •.... Iv NIIP nowt 1 --- --- _ - _ .... ....,......_ . C It 1 I IN: 11111 s 4) 0 L. 41.1 C i IS( i nail . . OM • mil ' k 2,, ,„,a, al' i Zjic2i1 /LP e it..4401 ' 1 ii.., . ..! , . in al , 1 I. s i . a t , 1 , 0 0 a 4,,,,/, N4 II . , 1 I'Nib iiii • ii , ; / s , i , ., ,, i I „4"...3.e., L a . L C C 71, i 1 V „I . . .,,, P 1 . . • 100' SUFFER 4 , . ' . i . . 1 i . 14.0 .1)..... ,,.., i . IL L . ea a amaa a amon a mum eumunis•eismo is ammo a ammo a ammo ,-- .,..,.._....,-• a maw a amma-iii mama i ii R<ft 41.112EA 317,13 .1-. _ a INIMMIMI 111 . . 1 3,,,,----- 23a . -----, !Li.L.--,. GENERAL MOTORS MA IN I NG CENTER $PX2P4165 ‘ 44144411114. . . , . Transportation Impact Analysis Carriage House Apartments Tigard, Oregon January 1995 • Transportation Impact Analysis Carriage House Apartments Tigard, Oregon Prepared for: Andrews Management Ltd. 8755 Citizens Dr., Suite 205 Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 (503) 682-0758 Prepared by: Kittelson &Associates, Inc. 610 S.W. Alder, Suite 700 Portland, Oregon 97205 (503) 228-5230 Project No.:1492.00 January 1995 January 1995 • Carriage House Apartments Table of Contents Table of Contents Section 1 Executive Summary 1 Section 2 Introduction 3 Section 3 Existing Conditions 7 Section 4 Traffic Impact Analysis 13 Section 5 Conclusions and Recommendations 23 Section 6 References 25 Appendix A Tax Lot Map of the Site Area Appendix B Traffic Counts and Data Appendix C Level-of-Service Methods and Criteria Appendix D Weekday A.M. and P.M. LOS Worksheets Appendix E Influence Area Map Kittelson &Associates, Inc. • January 1995 I • Carriage House Apartments List of Figures List of Figures • Figure 1 Site Vicinity 5 Figure 2 Existing Lane Configuration and Traffic Control Devices . . . . . . . . . . 9 Figure 3 1995 Existing Traffic Volumes Weekday AM and PM Peak Hours . . . . . . 11 Figure 4 1996 Background Traffic Volumes 15 Figure 5 Proposed Site Plan 17 Figure 6 Estimated Trip Generation 19 Figure 7 Site-Generated Traffic 20 Figure 8 1996 Total Trafic Volumes 21 • List of Tables Table 1 Zoning Scenarios 6 Table 2 Existing Transportation Facilities 8 Table 3 1995 Existing Level of Service 10 Table 4 1996 Background Level of Service Without Development 16 Table 5 Trip Generation 18 Table 6 1996 Total Traffic Levels of Service 22 Kittelson &Associates, Inc. ii January 1995 • Carriage House Apartments Executive Summary Executive Summary Andrews Management Ltd. is proposing to develop a 76-unit apartment complex on the south side of SW Pfaffle Street, adjacent to the General Motors Training Center, in Tigard, Oregon. A full-access driveway is proposed to serve the site on SW Pfaffle Street. The number of units could expand from 76 to 137 units if Andrews Management or some other developer chooses to make use of the increased density resulting from the requested zone changes from commer- cial-professional (C-P) and residential (R-4.5) to apartments (R-25). The maximum develop- ment of 137 units was assumed for this report. The results of the traffic impact analysis described in this report indicate that the proposed Carriage House Apartments can be developed while acceptable levels of service and safety are maintained at the site driveway and on the surrounding transportation system. The analysis resulted in the following findings and recommendations: • The proposed apartment complex (137 units) will generate approximately 885 daily trips, of which 70 trips will be during the typical weekday a.m. peak hour and 85 trips during the p.m. peak hour. • All the intersections within the study area currently operate at acceptable levels of service, with the exception of the weekday p.m. peak hour forced flow conditions that occur at the SW 78th Avenue/SW Pfaffle Street intersection. • The proposed apartment zoning for the site will result in 480 fewer trips on the transportation system than if the site were developed under the current commercial-pro- fessional and single-family residential zoning. • There is a sight distance problem at the SW Hall Boulevard/SW Pfaffle Street intersec- tion; however, accident data from this location does not reflect an unusually high incidence of accidents, and the development of this site is not expected to worsen the already existing condition. • The study area intersection and proposed site driveway will operate at acceptable levels of service under 1996 full-buildout conditions, with the exception of SW 78th Ave- nue/SW Pfaff le Street. This intersection will operate at forced flow conditions; how- ever, the proposed development will have minimal impacts on the operation and safety of the SW 78th Avenue/SW Pfaff le Street intersection. • The proposed apartment development, with its sidewalk network connecting the build- ings, should not have any internal circulation problems. Kittelson &Associates, Inc. 2 January 1995 • • Carriage House Apartments Introduction Introduction PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed site plan calls for the construction of a 76-unit apartment complex. This report was written assuming full-buildout of a 137-unit apartment complex, which will require associated zone changes on adjacent parcels. The current site plan is designed to have a full-access driveway located on SW Pfaff le Street approximately 100 feet west of-SW 83rd Avenue. Initial site construction of the 76-unit apartment complex is expected to begin in Spring 1995 with the completion and opening of the apartments in Fall 1995. SCOPE OF THE REPORT The purpose of this analysis is to determine the traffic-related impacts of a 137-unit apartment complex, which reflects full buildout of the site. The development is to be located adjacent to the General Motors Training Center, which has its main entrance on Highway 99W and a rear entrance on SW Pfaffle Street. Figure 1 is the site vicinity map for the proposed development. Specific issues discussed in this report include: • Existing and future traffic conditions in the site vicinity under the proposed access scheme during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. • Traffic operations for background 1996 traffic conditions without the development of the proposed apartments. • Trip characteristic estimates for a 137-unit apartment complex. • Operational issues at the intersections of SW Hall Boulevard/SW Pfaffle Street and SW 78th Avenue/SW Pfaffle Street. • Comparative analysis of trip generation for the site under both the existing zoning (C-P/commercial-professional and R-4.5/residential) and proposed zoning (R-25/apart- ments) conditions. PROPOSED LAND USE CHANGE The land required for construction of the 76-unit apartment complex, as well as the land that will be required to expand to a 137-unit apartment complex, will need to be changed from the existing zoning to multi-family residential (R-25) zoning. To build the proposed 76-unit apartment complex, the Andrews Management needs approval of two tax lot zoning changes: Andrews Management has the option to purchase a 2.55-acre lot (Tax lot 200) that is zoned commercial-professional(C-P), and seeks permission to use the southerly 0.68 acre of the adjacent 1.25-acre tax lot(Tax lot 300)to the west, which is currently zoned residential (R-4.5). Eventually, if it is possible, Andrews Management plans to expand to a 137-unit apartment complex that will encompass an additional 0.89 acre (tax lot 2200) that is currently zoned C-P to the south, 0.82 acre (tax lot 400) that is zoned R-4.5 on the other side of the 1.25-acre tax lot to the west, and the remaining 0.57 acres from the neighboring 1.25-acre lot (tax lot 300). Table 1 presents a breakdown of the three zoning scenarios: the existing zoning, proposed Kittelson &Associates, Inc. 4 • • 0 NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) a x I- N N N 3 N SW SPRUCE ST a s a a s I- n Z N O) co co m co n N • N N N N v) NSW PFAFFLE ST PG•F\G a ` z Z N N SW DARTMOUTH ® 0 ST J m J -J Q M N 7 SITE VICINITY PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS I FIGURE (7a TIGARD, OREGON 1 JANUARY 1995 1 1492F001 January 1995 • • Carriage House Apartments Introduction • Table 1 Zoning Scenarios Proposed Zoning Proposed Zoning Tax Lot Acreage Existing Zoning 70-unit 137-unit 200 2.55 C-P R-25 R-25 300 1.25 R-4.5 R-25* R-25 400 .82 R-4.5 No changes R-25 2200 .89 C-P No changes R-25 C-P Commercial-Professional R-4.5 Residential(Single-Family Detached Housing) R-25 Apartments(25 Apartments per Acre) * Approximately 0.68 acres out of 1.25 acres will be developed as apartments and the remainder will include the existing residence. 76-unit apartment complex zoning, and full-buildout 137-unit complex zoning. A tax lot map of the site area is included as Appendix A. This report uses the 137-unit apartment scenario for the traffic impact analyses. • • • • • • Kittelson &Associates, Inc. 6 January 1995 • • Carriage House Apartments Existing Conditions Existing Conditions SITE CONDITIONS AND ADJACENT LAND USES The site that would be required for full-buildout of the 137-unit apartment complex is mostly vacant except for two single-family residences. Four tax lots make up the site: two commer- cial-professional (C-P) lots with a total area of 3.44 acres, and two single-family detached housing (R-4.5) lots with a total area of 2.07 acres. The sites are bordered by SW Pfaff le Street to the north, General Motors to the east, residences to the west, and woods to the south, with Highway 217 beyond the woods. Residential neighborhoods lie to the north of SW Pfaffle Street. The eastern end of SW Pfaffle Street is zoned commercial to the south; however, the primary accesses for the businesses along that segment of SW Pfaff le Street are located on Highway 99W. The proposed site is located primarily in a residential area at the western end of SW Pfaff le Street where it intersects with SW Hall Boulevard. TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES Primary access to the proposed site is via SW Pfaff le Street,a minor collector running east-west. In the site vicinity, SW 83rd Avenue, a local street, intersects SW Pfaffle Street approximately 100 feet east of the proposed site driveway. Local streets in the area that run north-south are two-way stop-controlled at their intersections with SW Pfaffle Street. SW Hall Boulevard is a nearby north-south arterial. Table 2 is a summary of the transportation facilities in the site vicinity. Figure 2 shows the existing transportation system,traffic control, and lane configurations. Table 2 Existing Transportation Facilities Name Classification Cross Speed Side Bicycle On-Street Section (mph) Walks Lanes Parking SW Pfaffle Street Minor Collector 28 feet 35 N side NO NO SW Hall Boulevard Arterial 34 feet 30 NO YES NO SW 83rd Avenue Local Street 32 feet 25 YES NO YES SW 82nd Avenue Local Street 22 feet 25 NO NO YES SW 81st Avenue Local Street 32 feet 25 YES NO YES SW 79th Avenue Local Street 32 feet 25 NO NO YES SW 78th Avenue Local Street 22 feet 25 NO NO NO PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES AND ACTIVITY SW Pfaff le Street currently has sidewalks on the north side of the roadway in the site vicinity. Field observations in the vicinity of the proposed project site revealed a relatively small amount of pedestrian and bicycle activity near the proposed site. It is expected that this development will have a minimal impact on these travel modes. Kittelson&Associates, Inc. 8 • • • 0 NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) c t V a a d' Z N H N N N ® SW PFAFFLE ST r A a\l'T/1 QP • EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS FIGURE 7 TIGARD, OREGON IiJ JANUARY 1995 1492F002 January 1995 Carriage House Apartment. Existing Conditions TRANSIT FACILITIES Tri-Met does not provide service along SW Pfaffle Street. Routes 12 and 95X operate along Highway 99W with stops near the SW Dartmouth Street/Highway 99W intersection. Route 12 "Barbur Boulevard" operates between downtown Portland and Sherwood during the week and on weekends. Route 95X"Tigard I-5 Express" operates only during the a.m. and p.m. weekday peak hours. TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND PEAK HOUR OPERATIONS The analysis focused on the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour manual traffic counts were conducted in January 1995. These manual traffic counts were conducted between 7 and 9 a.m. and 4 and 6 p.m. on a mid-week day. The traffic counts indicated that the a.m. and p.m. peak hours occur from 7:30 to 8:30 a.m. and from 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. The existing weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3. Traffic counts and data used in this report are included as Appendix B. Current Levels of Service All level-of-service (LOS) analyses described in this report were performed in accordance with the procedures stated in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (Reference 1). A description of LOS and the criteria by which they are determined are presented in Appendix C. The appendix also includes a discussion of how LOS is measured and what is generally considered to be an acceptable range. To ensure that this analysis was based on a reasonable worst-case scenario, the peak 15-minute flow rate during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours was used for all of the intersection LOS analyses. For this reason, the analyses reflect conditions that are only likely to occur for 15 minutes out of each average weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Traffic conditions during all other weekday time periods will likely operate under better conditions than those described in this report. The average delay, volume/capacity ratio, and level of service for all-way stop-controlled intersections, and levels of service and reserve capacity for existing two-way stop-controlled intersections are listed in Table 3 for both the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Table 3 1995 Existing Level of Service All Way Stop Controlled Unsignalized Intersection Delay V/C LOS Reserve LOS Capacity WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR 230 C Boulevard/SW Pfaffle Street SW Hall B o SW 78th Avenue/SW Pfaffle Street 2.8 0.43 A WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR SW Hall Boulevard/SW Pfaffle Street 85 E SW 78th Avenue/SW Pfaffle Street 4.9 0.54 A Kittelson &Associates, Inc. 10 • • 3 io Li\ 0 NORTH I 135 10-, 5 (NOT TO SCALE) <5-4- 105 ♦ c 20 150--Nit c 20 of P R u-,in 0). M V N Q Q a a a Cr n N CO I- 1:0 CO CO ;El n Is ® SW PFAFFLE ST :,,,///:/•.7- /SITE J CO J � in 4 A.M. PEAK HOUR 00 ao 00 aN NQ iA l \k ilk., 175 25.1 25 15—► 115 or 20 225-.4 ? P c 70 I VN no 0 ill 0 0 CO O`d M 4 a a a 0 0 z z 1- i- O (NO ao n 0 N N N OSSW PFAFFLE ST SITE co e i A i. P.M. PEAK HOUR 4 1995 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY AM AND PM PEAK HOURS PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS I FIGURE pa TIGARD, OREGON 3 JANUARY 1995 J 1492F003 January 1995 • Carriage House Apartments Existing Conditions As shown in Table 3, both intersections studied operate at acceptable levels during both a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The SW Hall Boulevard/SW Pfaffle Street intersection currently operates at LOS "E" during the weekday p.m. peak period. Appendix D contains the weekday a.m. and p.m. LOS worksheets. Accident History All intersections within the study area operate within acceptable safety levels. The intersection of SW Hall Boulevard/SW Pfaffle Street has limited sight distance resulting from the vertical curve of SW Hall Boulevard as it crosses the Highway 217 overpass. The bridge abut- ment/guardrail along the eastern side of SW Hall Boulevard as it crosses the bridge also creates a sight distance problem for vehicles turning left from SW Pfaffle Street onto SW Hall Boulevard. An examination of the City of Tigard 1991-1994 reported traffic accident histories of the intersection revealed six accidents, of which five were non-injury. This amounts to 1.5 accidents per year, which is a tolerable level for intersections of this type. Kittelson &Associates, Inc. 12 • January 1995 Carriage House Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis Traffic Impact Analysis The effects of traffic generated by the proposed apartment development during the typical weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour periods were analyzed as follows: • On the basis of the proposed size of the apartments, the total number of future weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour trips were estimated for complete build-out of the site. • Background peak hour traffic estimates for 1996 were chosen as the basis for compar- ison. A growth factor of 3 percent per year was used to account for future traffic growth within the study area. • A comparative analysis was performed to determine the amount of added trips on the transportation system resulting from both existing and proposed zoning conditions. • Predicted site-generated traffic was added to the 1996 background volumes to determine the traffic operation levels at key intersections in the site vicinity and at the site driveway. • The access point location was evaluated for potential safety or operational deficiencies. • The internal circulation of the proposed apartment complex was studied. The methodology summarized above and the results of the analysis are presented in detail in the remainder of this section PLANNED TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS There are no known transportation improvements within the study area that are expected to influence future traffic patterns. 1996 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC The 1996 background volumes were projected to account for continued growth in the area. After consulting with the City of Tigard,it was concluded that an annual 3 percent global growth rate would appropriately account for additional traffic volumes in the site vicinity. The growth rate was applied to the existing traffic shown in Figure 3. Figure 4 shows the projected 1996 background volumes for the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours for the existing zoning and proposed zoning. Level-of-Service Analyses Table 4 shows the 1996 background LOS for both the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Appendix D contains the 1996 Background weekday a.m. and p.m. LOS worksheets. As shown in Table 4, the unsignalized intersection of SW Hall Boulevard/SW Pfaffle Street will operate at an acceptable level of service during both the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. In isolation the all-way stop-controlled intersection of SW 78th Avenue/SW Pfaffle Street operates at LOS A, but during peak hour periods forced-flow conditions are created by traffic backed up from the SW Dartmouth Street/Highway 99W signalized intersection. The proposed project will add less volume to this intersection than would development of the property as Kittelson &Associates, Inc. 14 • 0 If)0 N 0 V� K7 0 NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) 1 40 10.1...-0 IS IL 5 115— f— 150 5 4- 110 c 20 155.‘ c 20 tr 'N t /V o�n o in in O M M a a a a a o O= Z N_ r I- m CO m co ® SW PFAFFLE ST m -11 grr ,440 A.M. PEAK HOUR U� rn. V N 00 N•,:tu1 l & il \,.. 180 25.1 25 295 4—200 15--*• F 120 or 20 230. or 70 tIV tP ----. 9 00 inin0 NCO O.4r M N Q Q Q Q Q 0 n z N I- I- CO 03 pp n co 0 N N OSSW PFAFFLE ST SITE N# P.M. PEAK HOUR 4 1996 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS I FIGURE 174a TIGARD, OREGON JANUARY 1995 1492F004 January 1995 Carriage House Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis Table 4 1996 Background Level of Service Without.Development All Way Stop Controlled Unsignalized Intersection Delay V/C LOS Reserve LOS Capacity WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR SW Hall Boulevard/SW Pfaffle Street SW 78th Avenue/SW Pfaffle Street 2.8 0.44 A WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR SW Hall Boulevard/SW Pfaffle Street 50 E SW 78th Avenue/SW Pfaffle Street 4.9 0.55 A currently zoned. Future improvement of the SW Dartmouth Street/Highway 99W intersection would alleviate this already existing condition. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLANS Construction of the proposed 76-unit apartment development is planned for spring 1995, with the complex opening in fall 1995. The proposed 76-unit, two-story apartment development is designed to have one full-access in/out driveway on SW Pfaffle Street. The site plan for the 76-unit apartment complex shows 131 spaces available for off-street parking, of which 5 are designated handicapped. There will be 18 garages and 52 covered stalls. Figure 5 is an illustration of the current site plan for the proposed development. The Influence Area Map (Appendix E) shows the transportation network and land uses in the site vicinity. TRIP GENERATION Estimates of weekday a.m. and p.m.peak hour vehicle trips for the proposed apartment complex were developed from empirical observations at other, similar apartment developments. These observations are summarized in a standard reference manual called Trip Generation (Refer- ence 2). Table 5 shows the estimated weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation characteristics for the property under both current and proposed zoning conditions. Additionally, Table 5 includes a comparison of the daily trips and peak hour trips under full development with existing zoning: 1,415 total daily trips, 110 total a.m. peak hour trips, and 170 total p.m. peak hour trips. As shown in Table 5, the proposed 137-unit apartment complex will generate approximately 885 daily trips, of which 70 trips will be during the weekday a.m.peak hour and 85 trips during the p.m. peak hour. Under the current zoning, development of the site would result in 1,415 total daily trips and would contribute 560 more daily trips to the transportation system than the proposed zoning, which would result in 885 daily trips. This analysis indicates that the change in zoning for the proposed apartment development will result in fewer trips on the transporta- tion system than if the site were developed with the current zoning. Kittelson &Associates, Inc. 16 • r . 1...... 'I, 111 0 il--r c_F---a. IP LA\ [IN1 40 CAFIRIAG W 1-10US AT F' AFFLIE CFI CD A Cio PFAFPLE ROAD r_ _______ .....j.c_.____.......\ \..... . . .1 -I Ill-1-111- 1 1 .1 2C I I (AAR 1 ' n 51C 2C I nNiOLII,0tPt ti I [11] I { 1 OFF STREET PARKING 111 I Ft] ii 7 .._____ L 1 % .::. 52 9-0 x,e,.:.c■-•.,t■-t t.-.mt.i.5. 2..m• Als 23 i s 21 9,0 w ink,n1/112E-AA r 5,Al 1..-- y, III _ 1•I C•,•,'TI 1,,,,C C4-11t,At t A t At Ln 10 ). , 1.6 tcnAt.nrACEn Pr•,•■•••L rr, IPA! -- 114:1 trOltl.1!••■IMIT,I,to- ,AI I• Ili . -- —_- — 1 1 141 I CAP 1.' 1 III .11 0.. *BCC r, I_%_./I _ AREA SUMMARY z 0—r1 1,._.V.I r 1 n r c• , I 1.. 17171-"FID71.7171.... - — 1 A 1• L,,,C5 T-V 1 r_ — ..„ 1 tY x-9 0 t-i— 1 — 1,Ar•I,IIIG Al II:C.I•I.'• .1I,(••.) 1.... M — 71 . n STD A l 4,1Pr.4-.Arlt I,. .,•,"?•••? •11, -‹ ‘••••1 r'''' ( if[r frull. /,.... , --- -----..„ •. ,,Ir Apr A !.9 t•,4 tt:t,"... 1Y (1) - rn ,1:3 -I .,c V; A (0 0,„ V ,r .0, I ■1 ' 1411 I I I iiiir ,,...„e, ,, _.,__, 1 1 It'/--- ,_I I 1 ll (11 r-ri A-) Fri IT I i .__,' --L i 11,1:31 n_I lic_IT LI 1 1 V-4 _r___I I I_Li_ \ ''; 11 0 m - - -- PI v I I ) •/ Z—I III 1 ev:0 Ct A 1 ___ i 6 5!C .. I 1 \\•••••••—•—..:2147 , 1-4--■ I> (1) •\ -j:1.--._.' • 1 r.-1-I - ----------- .1°' ii__ .i___ A66.1 - 1 • — . - TL;_ .._ c,,i. .1YF —,:___ I IIV (..: . X --I rri •,.... -• • 1 LL[I, -ILL_ ! , -„- e i K ■ . I I r -------.....-1,7'' fk 0,; • .._ z -10 4'''U141 —I r-• A-,,... , 611 616 V) )16. \•,7-7-77:.—_----j..— 1 __-- ; _ Lki Cu I I "... - ........., ._ •: ..------- Z _ 1040-eiFFER *N. ..——-- Fi) 11 1 ----- VI i 1 SIA -....."--'......."-----3 I3 Ft \.......Q' L. "01...! . . ..-------- "N\ lo■lowomma (1°' , "r1 OINSAIAL"10•01412 TCANA421IIN*1 ,C11 5 Ul ..._ ri 1.. ........ \...._' ..) ■ 8 Z . January 1995 • • Carriage House Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis Table 5 Trip Generation Land Use Size ITE Daily Peak Hour Trips Code Trips Total Inbound Outbound WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR EXISTING ZONING Medical-Dental Office Building 37,462 sf 720 1280 100 75 25 (C-P) Single-Family Detached Housing 9 units' 210 85 5 <5 <5 (R-4.5) Total 1365 105 80 30 PROPOSED ZONING Apartment (R-25) 137 units* 220 885 70 10 60 Net Difference -480 -35 -70 30 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR EXISTING ZONING Medical-Dental Office Building 37,462 sf 720 1280 155 45 110 (C-P) Single-Family Detached Housing 9 units' 210 85 10 5 <5 (R-4.5) Total 1365 165 50 115 PROPOSED ZONING Apartment (R-25) 137 units* 220 885 85 60 25 Net Difference -480 -80 10 -90 * Total acres multiplied by number of units allowed per acre. TRIP DISTRIBUTION/ASSIGNMENT ANALYSIS The distribution of site-generated trips on to the roadway system within the study impact area was estimated through examination of current traffic conditions. Figure 6 shows the distribu- tion pattern during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Figure 7 shows the site-generated traffic assignments for the proposed apartments. TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES/OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS The 1996 background traffic volumes for the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours shown in Figure 4 were added to the site-generated traffic shown in Figure 7 to arrive at the 1996 total traffic volumes shown in Figure 8. Table 6 lists the 1996 total traffic levels of service with the proposed apartment complex. Kittelson &Associates, Inc. 18 • • 0 - NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) Q a a a a d' Z N_ H CO CO ONE N. N N N N N 35% 50% 50°k 25 S / _ SW PFAFFLE ST 0 TE J m ..®. 1 to 1:15% P i\C' Q I25% r<\ ESTIMATED TRIP GENERATION PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS I FIGURE K TIGARD, OREGON c JANUARY 1995 6 1492F006 • • in NO (NOT TO RTH SCALE) IL 20 f—<5 sr 10 5— Ir 5 3071 p l0 0 V a < a a n Cr N - o 03 CO m CO r\ f` cos SW PFAFFLE ST SITE i NO A Q, 4 A.M. PEAK HOUR 0 N - 10 r ----- �5 30...NI :2 5, F15 0 < < < < 0 0 n z - o m CO CO m r` n vi A A ® SW PFAFFLE ST SITE J m P.M. PEAK HOUR 4 SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS I FIGURE ga TIGARD, OREGON JANUARY 1995 7 ii 1492F007 III Ul NO ONtA 0 `Q 0 1 • 1 L ♦' (NOT TO NORTH SCALE) _. . -160 1-0 k5. - 115=► �- 150 5-3. 41 110 or 30 5. f 5 185 R or-20 1r to 0 \ tr O to ,n M N to to O.-- M M a a a a a °e z vn 5-- PI co 03 I- � in cn ® SW PFAFFLE ST ra SITE J ID Ott �4 A.M. PEAK HOUR OfM N�tA I V N • L I j �. 190 25.0° 25 295-4. 4-200 15-0. .0— 135 c 25 30....,* c.30 2454.4 R �/ or 70 t � ,1 \ t ! • N0, NdM N a a a a a K z N 1- i- co c co c is is ® SW PFAFFLE ST m 4,J ID 0 P.M. PEAK HOUR 4 1996 TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS FIGURE K TIGARD, OREGON Q JANUARY 1995 8 1492F008 • January 1995 • • Carriage House Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis Table 6 1996 Total Traffic Levels of Service All Way Stop Controlled Unsignalized Intersection Delay V/C LOS Reserve LOS Capacity WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR SW Hall Boulevard/SW Pfaffle Street 200 C Site Driveway/SW Pfaffle Street 715 A SW 78th Avenue/SW Pfaffle Street 3.1 0.46 A WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR SW Hall Boulevard/SW Pfaffle Street 35 E Site Driveway/SW Pfaffle Street 530 A SW 78th Avenue/SW Pfaffle Street 5.5 0.58 B All intersections studied, including the intersection of SW Hall Boulevard/SW Pfaff le Street, will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS during all time periods, as shown in Table 6. The site access driveway will operate at an acceptable level of service during both peak hour periods. Although forced-flow conditions occur during the peak hour periods at SW 78th Avenue/SW Pfaffle Street, the proposed apartment development would have minimal impacts on this already-existing condition. Improvement of the SW Dartmouth Street/Highway 99W intersec- tion would alleviate this condition. Appendix D contains the 1996 total traffic weekday a.m. and p.m. LOS worksheets. INTERNAL CIRCULATION An analysis of the proposed site plan indicated that the proposed apartment development should not have any internal circulation problems. A network of sidewalks links the buildings, allowing pedestrians to move within the site without having to compete with automobiles. As part of this analysis, the proposed site-access driveway on SW Pfaffle Street was examined for potential operational or safety deficiencies. It should be noted that the project team worked with Kittelson & Associates, Inc. to provide the most effective access scheme which would promote safe and efficient operation both on and off-site. The proposed site-access driveway is aligned approximately 100 feet west of the SW 83rd Avenue/SW Pfaffle Street intersection. The proposed site-access driveway was examined for adequate intersection and stopping sight distance, and was found to provide sufficient sight distances. Landscaping along the site frontage should be limited to low-growing ground cover or non-obstructing trees to continue to ensure adequate sight distance in both directions. Kittelson&Associates, Inc. 22 January 1995 • • Carriage House Apartments Conclusions and Recommendations Conclusions and Recommendations The traffic impact analysis described in this report indicates that the proposed Carriage House Apartments can be developed while an acceptable level of service and safety are maintained at the site driveway and on the surrounding transportation system. The analysis revealed the following findings and recommendations: • The proposed apartment complex with one driveway will generate.approximately 885 daily trips, of which 70 trips will be during the typical weekday a.m. peak hour and 85 trips during the p.m. peak hour. • All the intersections within the study area currently operate at acceptable levels of service, with the exception of the peak hour forced flow conditions that occur at the SW 78th Avenue/SW Pfaff le Street intersection as a result of the SW Dartmouth Street/High- way 99W signalized access. • The proposed apartment zoning for the site will result in 480 fewer trips on the transportation system than if the site were developed under the current commercial-pro- fessional and single-family residential zoning. • There is a sight distance problem at the SW Hall Boulevard/SW Pfaffle Street intersec- tion. However, accident data from this location do not reflect an unusually high incidence of accidents, and the development of this site is not expected to worsen the already existing condition. • The study area intersection and proposed site driveway will operate at acceptable levels of service under 1996 full-buildout conditions, with the exception of SW 78th Ave- nue/SW Pfaffle Street. This intersection will operate at forced flow conditions; how- ever, the proposed development will have minimal impact on the operation and safety of the SW 78th Avenue/SW Pfaffle Street intersection. • The proposed apartment development, with its sidewalk network connecting the build- ings, should not experience any internal circulation problems. Kittelson&Associates, Inc. 24 Appendix A Tax Lot Map of Site Area SW I/4 SW I/4 SECTION 36 US S R I W W.M. N WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON E SCALE I"=100. c I SEE MAP I I oD ' jr; I S 1 36C2 N -----1 Na ±. SW F. PFAFFLE ,-1- 2 C.R973 STREET , A11.$4 roe$4 I•e•.$( END Os �7� fMtIa •111.,11 r. _ I 400 r,, " 300 $ 200 100 .BIAc I.0-'1'5 [ISAc e_Li � P.SSAc 1` J ZSiAc. ke51CleKVI O1 s Re,Aev‘12%o.' i C- P . 1 0 4 0,S7 Ac.. 112Commer6„t-0(A,..s;onaI C—p . _ . d 1 I -�1,5 :_1 C.ovwmercuo.\- r(04essioral .▪ ' s s z. O•Q'S Ac. o el g t w S 1 O • • Pro��o5e d 7(o-u1,,� L e(•f,* ~ CJI 1 : • RICH/BOSON ' et[ eS ` i i 1111 s u L 15e)E' • C S 116.17.E 1 ,1>'.IS \ C?eher A v 2200 ' ry a �� \ 89Ac. �Ao V ors i 'p), o icq 1 X -ra ." 23 -8I I'I!INVENTORY SHEER Project Name: LC ,(`(• I0,-.,C Hot-, • arf ``>t ,:i..:77: I KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Project Number: ��,�1 %'', 1 310 SW Alder, Suite 700 Analyst: E -m / } ' Portland,Oregon 97205 Date: .,t`:, \" , (503)228-5230 Filename: C:\OPW\i IA94RON.WB1 1 =ax: (503)273-8169 SITE VICINITY MAP INTERSECTIONS: • Land Use Street Network Bus Routes/Stops Lane Configurations Control Type Progression Signal Phasing Storage for RT and LT lanes . N - )14'x..441 r' 2) -. I -2,- •/\--1.` J' 'k- \" i I ` ��j';''y �/ y i c. - - ;-- \ ., 5) 6) NOTES: \ _ i_ / ^t�� t r" Ire;• `\`` !!"-.i` .�`� _ :�• I I 1 'T ii ._ \-1 ' • ` i t " ' L°STREETS ^ l •— �T -!• -� '� � 1 �� •. �� 2 2 % .t, 4mot 7,.,--- -�J1_r_,d- '-'-•- y I�.�� a � .. _ _ i Street Name 'Classification Cross Posted Side s Bi .- On-Street Numbe�iof Lanes Section Soeed walks I Lanes ' Parkina I and Lane Width X \, I �� 1 4 ' n 25 ,`� . , [ \I i 2- Z , 2S I )\:\r,_ I �,i I H 1 J INTERSECOLFTURN MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMOREPORT PFAFFLE AT SW 78TH STREET • T= 2.8% P=.847 N 161 • DATE OF COUNT: 01/05/96 0 120 DAY OF WEEK: Thu - - R 010 50 a-A TIME STARTED: 07:00 T TIME ENDED: 09:00 H 4-144 4-1 L. 4-128 • • 10 - L5 T= 2.1% T= 2.8% X<S—► 4--1.64 105 P=.651 P=.864 1 • r1-920 TEV=TOTAL ENTRY VOLUME T=%TRUCKS BY APPROACH 4l I r► P=PHF BY APPROACH 159 —► 5 —► 3-30 5 2.0-' Peak Hour 1217 • 07:30-08 :30 Traffic Smithy T= 1.5% P=.730 138 TEV=386 Traffic Survey Service EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND TIME PERIOD • • • FROM - TO —► 4-1 4- L► 4 1 I rr°. r 4- L ALL 07:00-07:05 5 1 0 0 3 0 2 1 0 2 9 0 23 07:05-07:10 12 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 2 6 0 25 07:10-07:15 11 0 0 0 4 0 2 1 0 1 6 0 25 alj 07:15-07:20 20 0 0 0 6 0 3 0 0 1 2 0 32 07:20-07:25 7 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 2 9 0 22 07:25-07:30 9 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 2 2 10 0 2 07:30-07:35 14 1 0 3 3 0 1 0 0 5 8 0 35 07:35-07:40 11 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 5 0 23 07:40-07:45 20 0 0 0 8 ' 1 3 0 0 2 2 0 3b' 07:45-07:50 17 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 1 1 8 1 36 07:50-07:55 19 0 4 0 3 0 6 0 0 1 8 0 411 07:55-08 :00 17 0 1 0 6 0 1 1 0 2 12 1 4j..1 08:00-08 :05 14 0 0 0 4 0 3 1 1 0 8 2 33 08:05-08 :10 10 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 12 0 28 08:10-08 :15 7 0 2 3 2 0 4 0 0 1 11 0 30 08:15-08 :20 6 0 0 0 4 0 2 1 0 1 10 0 24 08 :20-08 :25 5 0 0 1 5 1 5 0 0 0 12 0 2795__j 08 :25-08 :30 8 0 1 1 5 0 2 0 0 4 8 1 30 08 :30-08 :35 12 0 3 1 3 0 2 1 0 1 2 0 08:35-08:40 4 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 2 0 14 08 :40-08:45 10 1 0 1 3 0 2 2 0 3 6 0 28 08:45-08:50 6 0 0 0 9 0 0 1 0 3 4 0 23 08 :50-08 :55 10 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 1 1 8 0 26 08:55-09:00 5 0 2 0 4 0 0 1 0 2 4 0 18 1 `1 • lb'{ Total Survey 259 3 20 13 93 2 46 16 5 41 172 5 675 PHF .66 .25 .42 .56 .83 .5 .7 .63 . 5 .53 .79 .42 . 817 % Trucks 1.5 0 10 7.7 2 .2 0 2.2 0 0 0 3 .5 0 2.4 Stopped Buses 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 Peds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 Hourly Totals 07:00-08 :00 162 2 8 6 46 1 22 7 3 23 85 2 367 07:15-08:15 165 1 11 9 45 1 27 4 4 19 95 4 385 07:30-08 :30 148 1 10 9 50 2 31 5 2 , 19 104 5 386 07:45-08 :45 129 1 15 8 44 1 31 8 2 16 99 5 359 08:00-09:00 97 1 12 7 47 1 24 9 2 18 87 3 308 INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY REPORT HALL BOULEVARD AND PFAFFLE • T= 3.5% P=.769 N 1508 ♦ DATE OF COUNT: 01/04/94 O i y15 q S 1424 DAY OF WEEK: Wed R 0 4 94 TIME STARED: 07:00 T TIME ENDED: 09:00 H 4-0 ,J i 1-11. i-15 5• 0 • L13-313$ T= 0% T= 4.2% 0 -► 4-0 P=0. P=.717 0 2% 20 TEV=TOTAL ENTRY VOLUME ♦ r T=%TRUCKS BY APPROACH 4-1 I r► P=PHF BY APPROACH 0 -* 109 -► 0 2-912%15 Peak Hour 436 ♦ 07:30-08:30 Traffic Smithy T= 5.8% P=.85 1306 TEV=969 Traffic Survey Service EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND FROM PETROIOD -► J 1J 1 L► 41 1 r► r 4- L ♦ ♦ ALL 07:00-07:05 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 11 1 2 0 5 39 07:05-07:10 0 0 0 0 21 6 0 7 2 3 0 7 46 07:10-07:15 0 0 0 0 29 4 0 20 2 2 0 5 62 07:15-07:20 0 0 0 0 33 7 0 23 1 2 0 4 70 07:20-07:25 0 0 0 0 25 9 0 18 1 2 0 14 69 .� 41 07:25-07:30 0 0 0 0 27 8 0 11 4 4 0 6 60 07:30-07:35 0 0 0 0 38 11 0 21 3 3 0 10 ' 07:35-07:40 0 0 0 0 35 7 0 22 0 0 0 5 69 07:40-07:45 0 0 0 0 28 14 0 26 3 2 0 6 7' 07:45-07:50 0 0 0 0 49 10 0 28 0 3 0 5 95 07:50-07:55 0 0 0 0 49 8 0 33 0 4 0 20 114 07:55-08 :00 0 0 0 0 42 7 0 21 3 2 0 16 91 08:00-08:05 0 0 0 0 27 11 0 29 1 1 0 11 8' 08 :05-08 :10 0 0 0 0 24 9 0 19 2 2 0 11 6 08 :10-08:15 0 0 0 0 30 4 0 33 1 1 0 12 81 08 :15-08:20 0 0 0 0 27 6 0 20 1 1 0 12 67 08 :20-08 :25 0 0 0 0 33 3 0 21 0 1 0 16 74 08:25-08 :30 0 0 0 0 32 4 0 18 1 2 0 9 66 08:30-08 :35 0 0 0 0 25 8 0 24 1 3 0 6 08 :35-08 :40 0 0 0 0 27 5 0 14 1 3 0 4 54 08 :40-08:45 0 0 0 0 22 5 0 24 5 2 0 5 63 08 :45-08 :50 0 0 0 0 27 10 0 23 1 1 0 7 69 08 :50-08:55 0 0 0 0 28 4 0 27 4 3 0 5 71 08 :55-09:00 0 0 0 0 23 5 0 20 2 2 0 7 59 Total Survey 0 0 0 0 721 165 0 513 40 51 0 208 1698 PHF 0 0 0 0 .74 .73 0 .84 .63 .61 0 .71 .807 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 3 .9 1.8 0 5.5 10 11.8 0 2 .4 4 .4 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 Hourly Totals 07:00-08:00 0 0 0 0 396 91 0 241 20 29 0 103 880 07:15-08:15 0 0 0 0 407 105 0 284 19 26 0 120 961 07:30-08:30 0 0 0 0 414 94 0 291 15 22 0 133 969 07:45-08 :45 0 0 0 0 387 80 0 284 16 25 0 127 919 08 :00-09:00 0 0 0 0 325 74 0 272 20 22 0 105 818 4, 110 -7,),z INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY REPORT HALL BOULAVALD AND PFAFFLE • T= 1.2% P=.844 N 1686 1��0 Zl0 DATE OF COUNT: 01/04/94 O • 1680 DAY OF WEEK: Wed R 0 498 240.8 TIME STARTED: 16 :00 T TIME ENDED: 18 :00 H 4-1 4-I 1 L. 4-197• 0 • L175 T= 0% T= .6% 0 -► 44e- 0 P=O. P=.834 TEV=TOTAL ENTRY VOLUME 0 r T=%TRUCKS BY APPROACH 41 t r► P=PHF BY APPROACH 0 - 290 -► 1-1:8" 505 8-2 g 0 Peak Hour 1500 0 • 16:30-17:30 Traffic Smithy T= .9% P=.907 1588 TEV=1471 Traffic Survey Service EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND TIME PERIOD J � ►� A �- � FROM - TO -► � l I r► ALL 16:00-16:05 0 0 0 0 22 4 0 31 6 3 0 10 76 16:05-16 :10 0 0 0 0 46 15 0 35 3 4 0 6 109 16:10-16:15 0 0 0 0 39 8 0 25 5 3 0 15 95 �� 16:15-16:20 0 0 0 0 46 14 0 41 4 1 0 9 115 16:20-16:25 0 0 0 0 39 6 0 44 5 1 0 20 115 . 16:25-16:30 0 0 0 0 35 13 0 45 3 3 0 18 117 16:30-16:35 0 0 0 0 39 20 0 40 8 2 0 12 121- 16:35-16:40 0 0 0 0 32 16 0 43 10 3 0 12 116 16:40-16:45 0 0 0 0 40 9 0 38 5 1 0 19 112 16:45-16:50 0 0 0 0 32 14 0 51 6 1 0 16 120 16 :50-16:55 0 0 0 0 43 15 0 35 10 4 0 15 122 16:55-17:00 0 0 0 0 35 13 0 37 5 2 0 11 10 17:00-17:05 0 0 0 0 47 24 0 51 9 2 0 16 149- 17:05-17:10 0 0 0 0 31 23 0 42 7 1 0 10 114 17:10-17 :15 0 0 0 0 40 24 1 48 4 2 0 9 128 17:15-17:20 0 0 0 0 59 20 0 40 9 2 0 15 14 17:20-17:25 0 0 0 0 43 17 0 39 4 1 0 17 121 17:25-17:30 0 0 0 0 37 13 0 41 5 1 0 23 120 17:30-17:35 0 0 0 0 40 20 0 39 7 5 0 5 116 17:35-17:40 0 0 0 0 32 10 0 36 3 3 0 18 102 17:40-17:45 0 0 0 0 41 14 0 40 5 1 0 8 109 17:45-17:50 0 0 0 0 33 13 0 41 2 1 0 11 101 17:50-17:55 0 0 0 0 36 14 0 40 3 3 0 7 103 17:55-18 :00 0 0 0 0 36 9 0 30 7 0 0 8 90 Total Survey 0 0 0 0 923 348 1 952 135 50 0 310 2719 PHF 0 0 0 0 .84 .73 .25 .9 .85 .69 0 .8 .933 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 1.5 .3 0 .8 1.5 0 0 .6 1 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Totals 16:00-17:00 0 0 0 0 448 147 0 465 70 28 0 163 1321 16:15-17:15 0 0 0 0 459 191 1 515 76 23 0 167 1432 16:30-17:30 0 0 0 0 478 208 1 505 82 22 0 175 1471 16:45-17:45 0 0 0 0 480 207 1 499 74 25 0 163 1449 17:00-18 :00 0 0 0 0 475 201 1 487 65 22 0 147 1398 INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARPREPORT PFAFFLE AT SW 78TH STREET • T= 2.3% P=.825 • - DATE OF COUNT: 01/04/96 NO 166 40 5 191 DAY OF WEEK: Wed R 20 .7- TIME STARTED: 16:00 T TIME ENDED: 18 :00 H +-232 4-1 1 L . 4-208 2325 J 43 25 T= .4% T. 0% .1715—► .— ►t5 P=.849 P=.825 225 x-20 TEV=TOTAL ENTRY VOLUME 1 ♦ r T=%TRUCKS BY APPROACH N P=PHF BY APPROACH 265 —* 52 —► 1336 X00 45 24.5-.50 Peak Pe 16:20-17:20 Traffic Smithy + T= 1% P=.877 1172 TEV=711 Traffic Survey Service EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND TIME FROM PERIOD TO D —► -I 4] 1 L. ~ 1 r L ALL, 16:00-16:05 8 2 2 1 0 0 1 4 2 8 10 1 39 16:05-16:10 12 0 3 2 3 0 3 6 6 2 10 3 50 t 16:10-16:15 11 0 2 1 7 0 6 2 5 8 12 0 54 '14 16:15-16:20 20 0 1 0 2 0 6 3 4 7 9 0 52 0 , 16:20-16:25 14 0 2 1 2 1 8 2 2 11 13 2 58 16:25-16:30 11 2 4 1 4 0 10 5 4 5 8 3 5'7 ' 16:30-16:35 22 2 4 3 2 1 10 2 1 8 11 2 68 -iyv 16:35-16:40 21 2 5 1 2 0 6 5 3 8 11 2 66 16:40-16:45 10 3 0 2 5 1 13 2 2 11 9 1 59 16 :45-16 :50 17 2 2 3 4 1 5 3 3 6 12 3 6 16:50-16:55 17 1 1 1 3 0 1 5 6 4 10 3 52 16:55-17:00 15 1 1 3 2 1 7 4 1 4 10 2 51 17:00-17:05 29 0 0 0 4 1 10 4 1 8 9 4 70' 17:05-17:10 20 1 2 0 4 0 8 6 3 3 3 0 50 17 :10-17:15 24 0 2 1 6 1 12 3 2 3 9 1 64 17:15-17:20 25 3 0 4 1 0 9 4 0 1 8 0 55 , 17:20-17:25 12 0 6 0 6 0 13 0 1 2 17 1 58 17:25-17:30 19 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 2 7 9 0 50 17:30-17:35 24 1 2 3 2 0 9 2 1 8 11 1 64 17:35-17:40 16 0 1 4 6 0 4 3 2 2 8 2 48 17:40-17:45 15 0 1 0 6 0 2 3 2 8 7 2 46 17:45-17:50 16 0 2 1 5 0 11 5 0 3 5 0 48 17:50-17:55 15 2 2 3 1 0 4 3 1 5 4 2 42 17:55-18:00 11 0 3 2 5 1 7 0 5 5 11 0 50 27Z Total Survey 404 23 51 39 83 11 167 77 59 137 226 35 1312 PHF .77 .61 .44 .71 .7 .88 .83 .8 .64 .67 .88 .64 . 920 % Trucks .2 0 2 0 3 .6 0 1.2 1.3 0 0 0 0 .6 Stopped Buses 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 5 0 Hourly Totals 16:00-17:00 178 15 27 19 36 5 76 43 39 82 125 22 667 16:15-17:15 220 14 24 16 40 7 96 44 32 78 114 23 708 16:30-17:30 231 16 26 20 40 9 96 39 25 65 118 19 704 16:45-17:45 233 10 21 21 45 7 82 38 24 56 113 19 669 17:00-18 :00 226 8 24 20 47 6 91 34 20 55 101 13 645 January 1995 Carriage House Apartment -DRAFT • Appendix C Appendix C Level of Service Concept Level of service (LOS) is a concept developed to quantify the degree of comfort (including such elements as travel time, number of stops, total amount of stopped delay, and impediments caused by other vehicles) afforded to drivers as they travel through an intersection or roadway segment. Six grades are used to denote the various LOS from A to F.1 Table C-1 Level of Service Definitions (Signalized Intersections) Level of Service Average Delay per Vehicle to Minor Street A Very low average stopped delay, less than five seconds per vehicle. This occurs when progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. B Average stop delay is in the range of 5.1 to 15.0 seconds per vehicle. This generally occurs with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for a LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay. C Average stopped delay is in the range of 15.1 to 25.0 seconds per vehicle. These higher delays may result from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. D Average stopped delays are in the range of 25.1 to 40.0 seconds per vehicle. The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle length, or high volume/capacity ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. E Average stopped delays are in the range of 40.1 to 60.0 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay.These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high volume/capacity ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. F Average stop delay is in excess of 60 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers. This condition often occurs with oversaturation. It may also occur at high volume/capacity ratios below 1.00 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also contribute to such high delay levels. • I Most of the material in this appendix is adapted from the Transportation Research Board,Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209(1985). Kittelson&Associates, Inc. A-1 January 1995 • Carriage House Apartments-DRAFT • Appendix C Signalized Intersections . . The six LOS grades are described qualitatively for signalized intersections in Table Al. Additionally, Table A2 identifies the relationship between level of service and average stopped delay per vehicle. Using this definition, a "D" LOS is generally considered to represent the minimum acceptable design standard. Table C-2 Level-of-Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Level of Service Stopped Delay per Vehicle(Seconds) A <_ 5.0 g 5.1 to 15.0 - C 15.1to25.0 p 25.1 to 40.0 E 40.1 to 60.0 F= > 60.0 • Kittelson&Associates, Inc. A-2 January 1995 Carriage House Apartment - RAFT • Appendix C Unsignalized Intersections The calculation of LOS at an unsignalized intersection requires a different approach. The 1985 Highway Capacity Manual includes a methodology for calculating the LOS at two-way, stop-controlled intersections. For these unsignalized intersections, LOS is defined using the concept of "reserve capacity" (i.e., that portion of available hourly capacity that is not used). A qualitative description of the various service levels associated with an unsignalized intersec- tion is presented in Table A3. A quantitative definition of LOS for an unsignalized intersection is presented in Table A4. Table C-3 General Level-of-Service Descriptions for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Delay per Vehicle to Minor Street A • Nearly all drivers find freedom of operation. • Very seldom is there more than one vehicle in the queue. B • Some drivers begin to consider the delay an inconvenience. • Occasionally there is more than one vehicle in the queue. C • Many times there is more than one vehicle in the queue. • Most drivers feel restricted, but not objectionably so. D • Often there is more than one vehicle in the queue. • Drivers feel quite restricted. E • Represents a condition in which the demand is near or equal to the probable maximum number of vehicles that can be accomodated by the movement. • There is almost always more than one vehicle in the queue. • Drivers find the delays approaching intolerable levels. F • Forced flow. • Represents an intersection failure condition that is caused by geometric and/or operational constraints external to the intersection. Kittelson&Associates, Inc. A-3 January 1995 • • Carriage House Apartments-DRAFT Appendix C Table C-4 Level-of-Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Reserve Capacity Expected Delay to Minor Street Traffic (pcph) Level of Service <_400 A Little or no delay 300-399 B Short traffic delays 200-299 C Average traffic delays 100-199 D Long traffic delays 0-99 E Very long traffic delays * F *When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lane,extreme delays will be encountered,with queueing that may cause severe congestion and affect other traffic movements in the intersection.This condition usually warrants intersection improvement. ' The reserve capacity concept applies only to an individual traffic movement or to shared lane movements. Once the LOS, capacity, and expected delay of all the individual movements have been calculated, an overall evaluation of the intersection can be made. Normally,the movement having the worst LOS defines the overall evaluation, but this may be tempered by engineering judgment. An "E" LOS is generally considered to represent the minimum acceptable design standard. Experience with the unsignalized analysis procedure indicates this methodology is conservative in that it tends to overestimate the magnitude of any potential problems. This is especially true for minor-street, left-turn movements. For example, the Highway Capacity Manual methodol- ogy does not take into account the effects of vehicle flow platoons that result from upstream signalization. Vehicles traveling in platoons tend to create greater gaps in the traffic flow,which sometimes provide additional capacity for the side closest to the signal. Therefore, the results of any unsignalized intersection analysis should be reviewed with this thought in mind. Generally, LOS E for the minor-street, left-turn movement is considered to be acceptable for an unsignalized intersection, although it also indicates that the need for signalization should be investigated. Kittelson&Associates, Inc. A-4 January 1995 Carriage House ApartmeneRAFT • Appendix C All-Way Stop Controlled Intersections2 There is no accepted procedure for a level-of-service analysis of an all-way, stop-controlled intersection. The procedure used for determining LOS for a four-way or three-way stop-con- trolled intersection differs from that described for unsignalized intersections. This methodol- ogy,which is being reviewed by the Unsignalized Intersection Committee of the Transportation Research Board, uses a capacity estimation method based on headways observed at all-way, stop-controlled intersections in the western United States. The procedure incorporates several important variables, including volume distribution, number of lanes on each approach, and the percentage of right and left turns at the intersection. Intersection performance is measured in parameters similar to signalized intersections: delay, volume-to-capacity ratio, and Level of Service using a scale of"A" through "F". Approach delay on any given leg of the intersection is calculated using the following equation: D =exp (3.8x C ) WhereD=vehicle delay on a given approach (sec/veh) SV=subject approach volume (vehicles per hour [vph]) C=calculated approach capacity (vph) exp=base of natural logarithms In this equation,the quantity SV/C is simply the volume-to-capacity ratio on the approach under consideration. Table A5 presents the LOS criteria for all-way, stop-controlled intersections. Table C-5 Level-of-Service Definitions (All-way, Stop-Controlled Intersections) Level of Service Average Delay per Vehicle to Minor Street A < 5 Seconds B 5to10Seconds C 10 to 20 Seconds D 20 to 30 Seconds E 30 to 45 Seconds F > 45 Seconds 2 Kyte,Michael,Estimating Capacity and Delay at an All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection. University of Idaho, Depart- ment of Civil Engineering Research Report September 1989. Kittelson &Associates, Inc. A-5 • # Appendix D Weekday A. M. and P.M. LOS Worksheets 1492EXAM.IN Thu Jan 12, 1995 14:59:51 Page 1-1 1492EXAM.IN Thu Jan 12, 1995 14:59:51 Page 2-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES Turning Movement Report Link Volume Report Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Volume NB Link SB Link EB Link WB Link Total Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume Type In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Volume #1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St #1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St Base 0 290 15 95 415 0 0 0 0 20 0 135 970 Base 305 435 740 510 425 935 0 0 0 155 110 265 1940 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 290 15 95 415 0 0 0 0 20 0 135 970 Total 305 435 740 510 425 935 0 0 0 155 110 265 1940 #2 Site Driveway/Pfaffle St #2 Site Driveway/Pfaffle St Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 145 0 255 Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 145 255 145 110 255 510 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 145 0 255 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 145 255 145 110 255 510 #3 78th St/Pfaffle St #3 78th St/Pfaffle St Base 30 5 5 5 50 10 10 5 150 20 105 5 400 Base 40 220 260 65 20 85 165 145 310 130 15 145 800 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 30 5 5 5 50 10 10 5 150 20 105 5 400 Total 40 220 260 65 20 85 165 145 310 130 15 145 ,800 #6 #6 Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1 1492EXAM.IN Thu Jan 12, 1995 14:59:51 Page 3-1 1492EXAM.IN - Thu Jan 12, 1995 14:59:51 Page 4-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 , PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in Intersection #1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St C xxxxx 0.000 C xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C Level Of Service: C # 3 78th St/Pfaffle St A 2.8 0.431 A 2.8 0.431 * 0.000 V/C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T . - R L - T - R L - T - R. I II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Arterial Base Future Change Rights: Include Include Include Include el Trvl Avg. Trvl Avg. in Avg. Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Dir LOS Time Speed LOS Time Speed Speed I II II II Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 290 15 95 415 0 0 0 0 20 0 135 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 290 15 95 415 0 0 0 0 20 0 135 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 PHF Volume: 0 348 18 114 498 0 0 0 0 24 0 162 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 348 18 114 498 0 0 0 0 24 0 162 • I II II II I Adjusted Volume Module: Grade: Ot -0% Ot 0% t Cycle/Cars: 0.00 0.92 0.00 0.92 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx t Truck/Comb: 0.06 0.02 0.06 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx PCE Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Cycl/Car PCE: 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE: 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Adj Vol.: 0 348 18 120 498 0 0 0 0 26 0 178 I it II II I Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 e< » Run Speed(N/S) : 30 MPH ee RT Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 II II II Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 498 xxxx xxxxx 366 xxxx xxxxx 1140 978 498 969 969 357 Potent Cap.: 707 xxxx xxxxx 830 xxxx xxxxx 184 279 631 282 282 654 I Used Cap.: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 14.4 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.4 0.0 27.2 Impedance: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 0.90 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 0.80 Actual Cap.: 707 xxxx xxxxx 830 xxxx xxxxx 133 252 631 255 255 654 II II II 1 Level Of Service Module: Unused Cap.: 707 xxxx xxxxx 711 xxxx xxxxx 133 252 631 229 255 476 LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * C * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * • * * * * * * * * * Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. .Page 2 1492EXAM.IN Thu Jan 12, 1995 14:59:51 Page 5-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES Level Of Service Computation Report 4-Way Stop Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection 83 78th St/Pfaffle St Cycle (sec) : 1 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.431 Loss Time (sec) : 0 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 2.8 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R • 1 11 11 11 1 Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 II 11 II 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 30 5 5 5 50 10 10 5 150 20 105 5 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 30 5 5 5 50 10 10 5 150 20 105 5 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 • PHF Volume: 32 5 5 5 53 11 11 5 160 21 112 5 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . Reduced Vol: 32 5 5 5 53 11 11 5 160 21 112 5 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 32 5 5 5 53 11 11 5 160 21 112 5 1 11 11 11 1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 324 324 324 160 160 160 644 644 644 820 820 820 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.07 0.77 0.16 0.06 0.03 0.91 0.15 0.81 0.04 . Final Sat.: 324 162 162 12 123 26 40 18 585 125 666 30 1 11 II II 1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.03 0.03 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.17 .0.17 0.17 Grit Moves: **** •*** **** ** 1I 1. 1 s Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 1.5 1.1 1.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 2.8 2.8 2.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 . Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 1.5 1.1 1.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 2.8 2.8 2.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 Queue: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. .Page 3 • 1492EXPM.IN Thu Jan 12, 1995 15:42:12 Page 1-1 1492EXPM.IN Thu Jan 12, 1995 15:42:12 Page 2-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES Turning Movement Report Link Volume Report Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Volume NB Link SB Link EB Link WB Link Total Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume Type In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Volume #1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St #1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St Base 0 505 80 210 480 0 0 0 0 20 0 175 1470 Base 585 500 1085 690 680 1370 0 0 0 195 290 485 2940 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 505 80 210 480 0 0 0 0 20 0 175 1470 Total 585 500 1085 690 680 1370 0 0 0 195 290 485 2940 #2 Site Driveway/Pfaffle St #2 Site Driveway/Pfaffle St Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 290 0 0 195 0 485 Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 290 195 485 195 290 485 970 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 290 0 0 195 0 485 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 290 195 485 195 290 485 970 #3 78th St/Pfaffle St #3 78th St/Pfaffle St Base 100 45 30 5 40 20 25 15 225 70 115 25 715 Base 175 335 510 65 95 160 265 235 500 210 50 260 1430 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 100 45 30 5 40 20 25 15 225 70 115 25 715 Total 175 335 510 65 95 160 265 235 500 210 50 260 1430 #6 #6 Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ill Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1 1492EXPM.IN Thu Jan 12, 1995 15:42:12 Page 3-1 1492EXPM.IN Thu Jan 12, 1995 15:42:12 , Page 4-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in Intersection #1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St E xxxxx 0.000 E xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C Level Of Service: E # 3 78th St/Pfaffle St A 4.9 0.542 A 4.9 0.542 + 0.000 V/C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Arterial Base Future Change Rights: Include Include Include Include Trvl Avg. Trvl Avg. in Avg. Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 • Dir LOS Time Speed LOS Time Speed Speed I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 505 80 210 480 0 0 0 0 20 0 175 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 505 80 210 480 0 0 0 0 20 0 175 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 0 562 89 234 534 0 0 0 0 22 0 195 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "0 Final Vol.: 0 562 89 234 534 0 0 0 0 22 0 195 I II II II I Adjusted Volume Module: Grade: 01 01: Ot Ot t Cycle/Cars: 0.00 0.92 0.00 0.92 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx t Truck/Comb: 0.06 0.02 0.06 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx PCE Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Cycl/Car PCE: 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE: 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Adj Vol.: 0 562 89 245 534 0 0 0 0 24 0 214 I it II II I Critical Gap Module: > Population: 0 « > Run Speed(N/S): 30 MPH « RT Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 534 xxxx xxxxx 651 xxxx xxxxx 1613 1418 534 1374 1374 606 Potent Cap.: 678 xxxx xxxxx 595 xxxx xxxxx 95 156 599 164 164 471 • t Used Cap.: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 41.2 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 0.0 45.4 Impedance: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 0.67 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 0.63 Actual Cap.: 678 xxxx xxxxx 595 xxxx xxxxx 40 104 599 109 109 471 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Unused Cap.: 678 xxxx xxxxx 350 xxxx xxxxx 40 104 599 85 109 257 LOS by Move: * * * B * * * * * E * C Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 2 1492EXPM.IN Thu Jan 12, 1995 15:42:12 Page 5-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 ' PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES Level Of Service Computation Report 4-Way Stop Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #3 78th St/Pfaffle St Cycle (sec) : 1 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.542 Loss Time (sec) : 0 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 4.9 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I III Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 II II II Volume Module: Base Vol: 100 45 30 5 40 20 25 15 225 70 115 25 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 100 45 30 5 40 20 25 15 225 70 115 25 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 109 49 33 5 44 22 27 16 245 76 125 27 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 109 49 33 5 44 22 27 16 245 76 125 27 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . Final Vol.: 109 49 33 5 44 22 27 16 245 76 125 27 11 II II 1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 372 372 372 223 223 223 531 531 531 726 726 726 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.60 0.40 0.07 0.62 0.31 0.09 0.06 0.85 0.33 0.55 0.12 Final Sat.: 372 222 150 16 138 69 50 29 452 242 398 86 I II II II 1 . Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.29 0.22 0.22 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.31 0.31 0.31 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** 11 I I 11 Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 3.0 2.3 2.3 3.4 3.4 3.4 7.9 7.9 7.9 3.3 3.3 3.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 3.0 2.3 2.3 3.4 3.4 3.4 7.9 7.9 7.9 3.3 3.3 3.3 Queue: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 3 1492BKAM.CMD Tue Jan 17, 1995 13:56:55 Page 1-1 1492BKAM.CMD Tue Jan 17, 1995 13:56:55 Page 2-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS 1996 BACKGROUND AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 1996 BACKGROUND AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES Turning Movement Report Link Volume Report Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Volume NB Link SB Link EB Link WB Link Total Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume Type In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Volume #1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St #1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St Base 0 299 15 98 427 0 0 0 0 21 0 139 999 Base 314 448 762 525 438 , 963 0 0 0 160 113 273 1998 Added 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 299 15 98 427 0 0 0 0 21 0 139 999 Total 314 448 762 525 438 963 0 0 0 160 113 273 1998 #2 Site Driveway/Pfaffle St #2 Site Driveway/Pfaffle St Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 0 0 149 0 263 Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 149 263 149 113 263 525 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 0 0 149 0 263 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 149 263 149 113 263 525 #3 78th St/Pfaffle St #3 78th St/Pfaffle St Base 31 5 5 5 52 10 10 5 155 21 108 5 412 Base 41 227 268 67 21 88 170 149 319 134 15 149 824 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 31 5 5 5 52 10 10 5 155 21 108 5 412 Total 41 227 268 67 21 88 170 149 319 134 15 149 824 #6 #6• Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1 1492BKAM.CMD Tue Jan 17, 1995 13:56:55 Page 3-1 14928KAM.CMD Tue Jan 17, 1995 13:56:55 Page 4-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 • KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS 1996 BACKGROUND AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 1996 BACKGROUND AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Future Volume Alternative Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in Intersection #1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St C xxxxx 0.000 C xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C Level Of Service: C # 2 Site Driveway/Pfaffle St A xxxxx 0.000 A xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R # 3 78th St/Pfaffle St A 2.8 0.444 A 2.8 0.444 + 0.000 V/C i II II II 1 Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign • Rights: Include Include Include Include ---- Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Arterial Base Future Change 1 II 1I II I Trvl Avg. Trvl Avg. in Avg. Volume Module: Dir LOS Time Speed LOS Time Speed Speed Base Vol: 0 290 15 95 415 0 0 0 0 20 0 135 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Initial Bse: 0 299 15 98 427 0 0 0 0 21 0 ' 139 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 299 15 98 427. 0 0 0 0 21 0 139 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 PHF Volume: 0 359 19 117 513 0 0 0 0 25 0 167 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . Final Vol.: 0 359 19 117 513 0 0 0 0 25 0 167 . Adjusted Volume Module: Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0% % Cycle/Cars: 0.00 0.92 0.00 0.92 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx % Truck/Comb: 0.06 0.02 0.06 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx PCE Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Cycl/Car PCE: 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE: 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Adj Vol.: 0 359 19 123 513 0 0 0 0 27 0 184 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 « » Run Speed(N/S) : 30 MPH cc RT Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 6.5 . 6.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 I II II II 1 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 513 xxxx xxxxx 377 xxxx xxxxx 1175 1008 513 998 998 368 Potent Cap.: 694 xxxx xxxxx 821 xxxx xxxxx 175 268 618 271 271 646 % Used Cap.: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 15.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0' 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 28.4 Impedance: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 0.90 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 0.79 Actual Cap.: 694 xxxx xxxxx 821 xxxx xxxxx 125 241 618 244 244 646 11 ii II I. Level Of Service Module: Unused Cap.: 694 xxxx xxxxx 697 xxxx xxxxx 125 241 618 216 244 462 LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * C * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - "RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ • Kittelson & Associates, Inc. . Page 2 • 1492BKAM.CMD Tue Jan 17, 1995 13:56:55 Page 5-1 1492BKAM.CMD Tue Jan 17, 1995 13:56:55 Page 6-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS 1996 BACKGROUND AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 1996 BACKGROUND AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method 4-Way Stop Method Future Volume Alternative Future Volume Alternative Intersection #2 Site Driveway/Pfaffle St Intersection #3 78th St/Pfaffle St Level Of Service: A Cycle (sec) : 1 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.444 Loss Time (sec) : 0 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 2.8 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Rights: Include Include Include Include I II 1I it ilk Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign I II II II I Rights: Include Include Include Include Volume Module: Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 110 0 0 145 0 I 1I II II I Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Volume Module: Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 0 0 149 0 Base Vol: 30 5 5 5 50 10 10 5 150 20 105 5 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 0 0 149 0 Initial Bse: 31 5 5 5 52 10 10 5 155 21 108 5 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Initial Fut: 31 5 5 5 52 10 10 5 155 21 108 5 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 121 0 0 159 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 121 0 0 159 0 PHF Volume: 33 5 5 5 55 11 11 5 165 22 115 . 5 Adjusted Volume Module: Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0t - 015 Ot 0% Reduced Vol: 33 5 5 5 55 11 11 5 165 22 115 5 t Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx • xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Is Truck/Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 33 5 5 5 55 11 11 5 165 22 115 5 Cycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx I II II it Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Saturation Flow Module: ' Adj Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 121 0 0 159 0 Sat/Lane: 324 324 324 160 160 160 644 644 644 820 820 820 Critical Gap Module: a> Population: 0 << >> Run Speed(E/W) : 30 MPH << Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg Lanes: 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.07 0.78 0.15 0.06 0.03 0.91 0.15 0.81 0.04 Critical Gp: 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx Final Sat.: 324 162 162 11 124 25 39 18 587 127 664 29 I II II II I I it II II Capacity Module: Capacity Analysis Module: Inflict Vol: 280 280 121 280 280 159 159 xxxx xxxxx 121 xxxx xxxxx Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.03 0.03 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.17 0.17 0.17 Potent Cap.: 723 723 875 649 723 931 996 xxxx xxxxx 1000 xxxx xxxxx Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** t Used Cap.: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx I II II II I Impedance: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx Level of Service Module: Actual Cap.: 723 723 875 649 723 931 996 xxxx xxxxx 1000 xxxx xxxxx Delay/Veh: 1.5 1.1 1.1 5.4 5.4 5.4 2.9 2.9 2.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 I II II II I Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Level Of Service Module: AdjDel/Veh: 1.5 1.1 1.1 5.4 5.4 5.4 2.9 2.9 2.9 1.9 1.9 ' 1.9 Unused Cap.: 723 723 875 649 723 931 996 xxxx xxxxx 1000 xxxx xxxxx Queue: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * • * * • * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx . Shared LOS: * * * * * • * * * * * * Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ • Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 3 • 1492BKPM.CMD Tue Jan 17, 1995 13:58:13 Page 1-1 1492BKPM.CMD Tue Jan 17, 1995 13:58:13 Page 2-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS 1996 BACKGROUND PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 1996 BACKGROUND PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES Turning Movement Report Link Volume Report Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Volume NB Link SB Link EB Link WB Link Total Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume Type In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Volume #1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St #1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St Base 0 520 82 216 494 0 0 0 0 21 0 180 . 1514 Base 603 515 1118 711 700 1411 0 0 0 201 299 500 3028 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 520 82 216 494 0 0 0 0 21 0 180 1514 Total 603 515 1118 711 700 1411 0 0 0 201 299 500 3028 #2 Site Driveway/Pfaffle St #2 Site Driveway/Pfaffle St Base 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 299 0 0 201 0 500 Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 299 201 500 201 299 500 999 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 299 0 0 201 0 500 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 299 201 500 201 299 500 999 #3 78th St/Pfaffle St #3 78th St/Pfaffle St Base 103 46 31 5 41 21 26 15 232 72 118 26 736 Base 180 345 525 67 98 165 273 242 515 216 52 268 1473 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 103 46 31 5 41 21 26 15 232 72 118 26 736 Total 180 345 525 67 98 165 273 242 515 216 52 268 1473 #6 #6 Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1 1492BKPM.CMD Tue Jan 17, 1995 13:58:13 Page 3-1 1492BKPM.CMD Tue Jan 17, 1995 13:58:14 Page 4-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS • 1996 BACKGROUND PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 1996 BACKGROUND PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Future Volume/Alternative Intersection Base Future Change / Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in Intersection #1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St E xxxxx 0.000 E xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C Level Of Service: E # 2 Site Driveway/Pfaffle St A xxxxx 0.000 A xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R # 3 78th St/Pfaffle St A 4.9 0.546 A 4.9 0.546 + 0.000 V/C 1 11 11 11 1 Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign • Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Arterial Base Future Change 1 11 11 . 11 1 Trvl Avg. Trvl Avg. in Avg. Volume Module: Dir LOS Time Speed LOS Time Speed Speed Base Vol: 0 505 80 210 480 0 0 0 0 20 0 175 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Initial Bse: 0 520 82 216 494 0 0 0 0 21 0 180 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 520 82 216 494 0 0 0 0 21 0 180 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 PHF Volume: 0 624 99 260 594 0 0 0 .0 25 0 216 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 624 99 260 594 0 0 0 0 25 0 216 Adjusted Volume Module: Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0% % Cycle/Cars: 0.00 0.92 0.00 0.92 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx % Truck/Comb: 0.06 0.02 0.06 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx PCE Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Cycl/Cdr PCE: 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE: 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Adj Vol.: 0 624 99 273 594 0 0 0 0 27 0 238 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 < » Run Speed(N/S) : 30 MPH <a RT Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 11 11 11 1 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 594 xxxx xxxxx 723 xxxx xxxxx 1793 1577 594 1527 1527 674 Potent Cap.: 635 xxxx xxxxx 546 xxxx xxxxx 82 125 555 135 135 431 III % Used Cap.: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 49.9 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.2 0.0 55.3 Impedance: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 0.58 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 0.53 Actual Cap.: 635 xxxx xxxxx 546 xxxx xxxxx 25 72 555 78 78 431 1 -11 11 11 1 Level Of Service Module: Unused Cap.: 635 xxxx xxxxx 273 xxxx xxxxx 25 72 555 51 78 193 LOS by Move: * * * C * * * * * E * D Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 2 1492BKPM.CMD Tue Jan 17, 1995 13:58:14 Page 5-1 1492BKPM.CMD Tue Jan 17, 1995 13:58:14 Page 6-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS 1996 BACKGROUND PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 1996 BACKGROUND PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method 4-Way Stop Method ' Future Volume Alternative Future Volume Alternative ' Intersection #2 Site Driveway/Pfaffle St Intersection #3 78th St/Pfaffle St . Level Of Service: A Cycle (sec) : 1 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : ' 0.546 Loss Time (sec) : 0 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 4.9 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R . ii 1i ii I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Rights: Include Include Include Include I II II 11 • Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign ' I II 11 1I I Rights: Include Include Include Include Volume Module: Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 290 0 0 195 0 1 H ii Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Volume Module: Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 299 0 0 201 0 Base Vol: 100 45 30 5 40 20 25 15 225 70 115 25 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 299 0 0 201 0 Initial Bse: 103 46 31 5 41 21 26 15 232 72 118 26 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Initial Fut: 103 46 31 5 41 21 26 15 232 72 118 26 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 318 0 0 214 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 318 0 0 214 0 PHF Volume: 110 49 33 5 44 22 27 16 247 77 126 27 Adjusted Volume Module: Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0% Reduced Vol: 110 49 33 5 44 22 27 16 247 77 126 27 % Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 % Truck/Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 110 49 33 5 44 22 27 16 247 77 126 27 Cycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx I II i1 11 Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Saturation Flow Module: Adj Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 318 0 0 214 0 Sat/Lane: 372 372 372 223 223 223 531 531 531 726 726 726 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 « » Run Speed(E/W) : 30 MPH << Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg Lanes: 1.00 0.60 0.40 0.07 0.62 0.31 0.09 0.06 0.85 0.33 0.55 0.12 Critical Gp: 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx Final Sat.: 372 222 150 16 138 69 49 29 452 243 398 85 1 11 11 II I I ii 1i i1 1 Capacity Module: Capacity Analysis Module: Cnflict Vol: 532 532 318 532 532 214 214 xxxx xxxxx 318 xxxx xxxxx Vol/Sat: 0.30 0.22 0.22 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.32 0.32 0.32 Potent Cap.: 524 524 689 468 524 876 969 xxxx xxxxx 874 xxxx xxxxx Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** % Used Cap.: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx I II- ii II 1 Impedance: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: Actual Cap.: 524 524 689 468 524 876 969 xxxx xxxxx 874 xxxx xxxxx Delay/Veh: 3.1 2.3 2.3 3.4 3.4 3.4 8.0 8.0 8.0 3.3 3.3 3.3 i H ii H I Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Level Of Service Module: AdjDel/Veh: 3.1 2.3 2.3 3.4 3.4 3.4 8.0 8.0 8.0 3.3 3.3 3.3 Unused Cap.: 524 524 689 468 524 876 969 xxxx xxxxx 874 xxxx xxxxx Queue: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx . Shared LOS: * • * * * * * * * * * * Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 3 • 1492WSAM.CMD Thu Jan 12, 1995 15:34:38 Page 1-1 1492WSAM.CMD Thu Jan 12, 1995 15:34:38 Page 2-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS 1996 AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH SITE 1996 AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH SITE Trip Generation Report Trip Distribution Report Forecast for Percent Of Trips Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total t Of To Gates # Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total 1 2 3 4 Zone 1 25.0 25.0 35.0 15.0 1 Pfaffle Apar 70.00 New trips 0.17 0.83 12 58 70 100.0 Zone 1 Subtotal 12 58 70 100.0 TOTAL 12 58 70 100.0 • • Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1 k 1492WSAM.CMD Thu Jan 12, 1995 15:34:38 Page 3-1 1492WSAM.CMD Thu Jan 12, 1995 15:34:39 Page 4-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS 1996 AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH SITE 1996 AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH SITE Turning Movement Report Link Volume Report Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Volume NB Link SB Link EB Link WB Link Total Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume Type In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Volume #1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St #1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St Base 0 299 15 98 427 0 0 0 0 21 0 139 999 Base 314 448 762 525 438 963 0 0 0 160 113 273 1998 Added 0 '0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 20 35 Added 2 9 11 4 20 25 0 0 0 29 6 35 70 Total 0 299 17 102 427 0 0 0 0 29 0 159 1034 Total 316 457 773 530 458 988 0 0 0 189 119 308 2068 #2 Site Driveway/Pfaffle St #2 Site Driveway/Pfaffle St Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 0 0 149 0 263 Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 149 263 149 113 263 525 Added 29 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 70 Added 58 12 70 0 0 0 6 29 35 6 29 35 140 Total 29 0 29 0 0 0 0 113 6 6 149 0 333 Total 58 12 70 0 0 0 119 178 298 155 142 298 665 #3 78th St/Pfaffle St #3 78th St/Pfaffle St Base 31 5 5 5 52 10 10 5 155 21 108 5 412 Base 41 227 268 67 21 88 170 149 319 134 15 149 824 Added 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 3 0 35 Added 3 29 32 0 0 0 29 6 35 3 0 3 70 Total 34 5 5 5 52 10 10 5 184 21 111 5 447 Total 44 256 300 67 21 88 199 155 354 137 15 152 894 #6 #6 Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 15 Added 0 0 0 0 15 15 15 0 15 0. 0 0 29 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 15 Total 0 0 0 0 15 15 15 0 15 0 0 0 29 • • • Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ • Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 2 1492WSAM.CMD Thu Jan 12, 1995 15:34:39 Page 5-1 1492WSAM.CMD Thu Jan 12, 1995 15:34:39 Page 6-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS 1996 AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH SITE 1996 AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH SITE Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Intersection Base Future Change Future Volume Alternative Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in Intersection #1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St C xxxxx 0.000 C xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C Level Of Service: C # 2 Site Driveway/Pfaffle St A xxxxx 0.000 A xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound # 3 78th St/Pfaffle St A 2.8 0.444 A 3.1 0.464 + 0.020 V/C Movement: I L - T - RBI L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign II Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include 1111 Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Arterial Base Future Change I II II II I Trvl Avg. Trvl Avg. in Avg. Volume Module: Dir LOS Time Speed LOS Time Speed Speed Base Vol: 0 290 15 95 415 0 0 0 0 20 0 135 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Initial Bse: 0 299 15 98 427 0 0 0 0 21 0 139 Added Vol: 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 20 Initial Fut: 0 299 17 102 427 0 0 0 0 29 0 159 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 PHF Adj: 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 PHF Volume: 0 359 21 123 513 0 0 0 0 35 0 191 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 359 21 123 513 0 0 0 0 35 0 191 Adjusted Volume Module: Grade: 0} 0% 0% 0% % Cycle/Cars: 0.00 0.92 0,00 0.92 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx i Truck/Comb: 0.06 0.02 0,06 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx PCE Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Cycl/Car PCE: 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE: 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Adj Vol.: 0 359 21 129 513 0 0 0 0 39 0 210 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 << » Run Speed(N/S) : 30 MPH << RT Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 513 xxxx xxxxx 379 xxxx xxxxx 1206 1015 513 1005 1005 369 Potent Cap.: 694 xxxx xxxxx 819 xxxx xxxxx 168 266 618 269 269 645 I Used Cap.: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 15.7 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.4 0.0 32.6 impedance: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 0.90 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 0.75 Actual Cap.: 694 xxxx xxxxx 819 xxxx xxxxx 114 239 618 242 242 645 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Unused Cap.: 694 xxxx xxxxx 690 xxxx xxxxx 114 239 618 203 242 434 LOS by Move: * * * A • * • • * C • A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * • * * * * • • Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 3 1492WSPM.IN Thu Jan 12, 1995 15:52:56 Page 7-1 1492WSPM.IN Thu Jan 12, 1995 15:52:56 Page 8-1 KITTFLSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS 1996 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH SITE '1996 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH SITE Level Of Service Computation'Report Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method 4-Way Stop Method . Future Volume Alternative Future Volume Alternative Intersection #2 Site Driveway/Pfaffle St Intersection #3 78th St/Pfaffle St r ' Level Of Service: ' A Cycle (sec) : 1 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.582 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 5.5 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: B Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R • Rights: Include Include Include Include I II II II Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign I II II II I Rights: Include Include Include Include Volume Module: Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 290 0 0 195 0 I II II II I Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Volume Module: Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 299 0 0 201 0 Base Vol: 100 45 30 5 40 20 25 15 225 70 115 25 Added Vol: 14 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 29 29 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Initial Fut: 14 0 14 0 0 0 0 299 29 29 201 0 Initial Bse: 103 46 31 5 41 21 26 15 232 72 118 26 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Added Vol: 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 15 0 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Initial Fut: 118 46 31 5 41 21 26 15 245 72 133 26 PHF Volume: 14 0 14 0 0 0 0 318 31 31 214 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Final Vol.: 14 0 14 0 0 0 0 318 31 31 214 0 PHF Volume: 125 49 33 5 44 22 27 16 261 77 142 27 Adjusted Volume Module: Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0% 0% O% 0% Reduced Vol: 125 49 33 5 44 22 27 16 261 77 142 27 t Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 % Truck/Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 125 49 33 5 44 22 27 16 261 77 142 27 Cycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx I II II II I Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Saturation Flow Module: Adj Vol.: 16 0 16 0 0 0 0 318 31 34 214 0 Sat/Lane: 375 375 375 212 212 212 522 522 522 716 716 716 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 « » Run Speed(E/W) : 30 MPH « Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg Lanes: 1.00 0.60 0.40 0.07 0.62 0.31 0.09 0.05 0.86 0.31 0.58 0.11 Critical Gp: 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx Final Sat.: 375 224 151 15 131 66 46 27 448 224 413 79 I II II II I I II II II I Capacity Module: Capacity Analysis Module: Cnflict Vol: 578 578 334 608 594 214 214 xxxx xxxxx 349 xxxx xxxxx Vol/Sat: 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.34 0.34 0.34 Potent Cap.: 490 490 675 419 479 876 969 xxxx xxxxx 846 xxxx xxxxx Crit Moves: **** **•* **** ****e' t Used Cap.: 3.2 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 4.0 xxxx xxxxx I II II II Impedance: xxxx 1.00 0.99 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 0.98 xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: Actual Cap.: 478 478 675 403 468 876 969 xxxx xxxxx 846 xxxx xxxxx Delay/Veh: 3.5 2.3 2.3 3.6 3.6 3.6 9.1 9.1 9.1 3.7 3.7 3.7 II II II I Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Level Of Service Module: AdjDel/Veh: 3.5 2.3 2.3 3.6 3.6 3.6 9.1 9.1 9.1 3.7 3.7 3.7 Unused Cap.: 463 478 659. 403 468 876 969 xxxx xxxxx 812 xxxx xxxxx Queue: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * • * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx „ahQ.xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx 528 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * A_. • * * * * * * * • * Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 4 1492WSPM.IN Thu Jan 12, 1995 15:52:56 Page 1-1 1492WSPM.IN Thu Jan 12, 1995 15:52:56 Page 2-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS 1996 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH SITE 1996 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH SITE Trip Generation Report Trip Distribution Report Forecast for Percent Of Trips Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total % Of To Gates # Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total 1 2 3 4 Zone 1 25.0 25.0 35.0 15.0 1 Pfaffle Apar 85.00 New trips 0.68 0.32 58 27 85 100.0 Zone 1 Subtotal 58 27 85 100.0 • TOTAL 58 27 85 100.0 • Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson &,Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1 1492WSPM.IN Thu Jan 12, 1995 15:52:56 Page 3-1 1492WSPM.IN Thu Jan 12, 1995 15:52:56 Page 4-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS 1996 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH SITE 1996 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH SITE Turning Movement Report Link Volume Report Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Volume NB Link SB Link EB Link WB Link Total Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume Type In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Volume #1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St #1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St Base 0 520 82 216 494 0 0 0 0 21 0 180 1514 Base 603 515 1118 711 700 1411 0 0 0 201 299 500 3028 Added 0 0 9 20 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 9 43 Added 9 4 13 20 9 30 0 0 0 14 29 43 85 Total 0 520 91 237 494 0 0 0 0 25 0 190 1557 Total 611 519 1130 731 710 1441 0 0 0 214 328 542 3113 #2 Site Driveway/Pfaffle St #2 Site Driveway/Pfaffle St Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 299 0 0 201 0 500 Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 299 201 500 201 299 500 99 Added 14 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 29 29 0 0 85 Added 27 58 85 0 0 0 29 14 43 29 14 43 170 Total 14 0 14 0 0 0 0 299 29 29 201 0 585 Total 27 58 85 0 0 0 328 214 542 230 312 542 1169 #3 78th St/Pfaffle St #3 78th St/Pfaffle St Base 103 46 31 5 41 21 26 15 232 72 118 26 736 Base 180 345 525 67 98 165 273 242 515 216 52 268 1473 Added 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 15 0 43 Added 15 14 28 0 0 0 14 29 43 15 0 15 85 Total 118 46 31 5 41 21 26 15 245 72 133 26 779 Total 195 359 553 67 98 165 286 271 558 231 52 282 1558 #6 #6 Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 7 Added 0 0 0 0 7 7 7 0, 7 0 0 0 14 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 7 Total 0 0 0 0 7 7 7 0 7 0 0 0 14 • Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 .(c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 2 • 1492WSPM.IN Thu Jan 12, 1995 15:52:56 Page 5-1 1492WSPM.IN Thu Jan 12, 1995 15:52:56 Page 6-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS 1996 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH SITE 1996 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH SITE Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Future Volume Alternative Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in Intersection #1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Hall Blvd/Pfaffle St E xxxxx 0.000 E xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C Level Of Service: I E j ',� rtaaa # 2 Site Driveway/Pfaffle St A xxxxx 0.000 A xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R # 3 78th St/Pfaffle St A 4.9 0.546 B 5.5 0.582 + 0.036 V/C 1 II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign • Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Arterial Base Future Change I II II 11 I Trvl Avg. Trvl Avg. in Avg. Volume Module: Dir LOS Time Speed LOS Time Speed Speed Base Vol: 0 505 80 210 480 0 0 0 0 20 0 175 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Initial Bse: 0 520 82 216 494 0 0 0 0 21 0 180 Added Vol: 0 0 9 20 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 9 Initial Fut: •0 520 91 237 494 0 0 0 0 25 0 190 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 PHF Volume: 0 624 109 284 594 0 0 0 0 30 0 228 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 624 109 284 594 0 0 0 0 30 0 228 Adjusted Volume Module: Grade: 01 01 Ot 01 t Cycle/Cars: 0.00 0.92 0.00 0.92 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx % Truck/Comb: 0.06 0.02 0.06 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx PCE Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Cycl/Car PCE: 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE: 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Adj Vol.: 0 624 109 298 594 0 0 0 0 33 0 251 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 cc » Run Speed(N/S) : 30 MPH cc RT Rad/Ang: 20.0. ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 II 11 II Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 594 xxxx xxxxx 734 xxxx xxxxx 1839 1611 594 1557 1557 679 Potent Cap.: 635 xxxx xxxxx 540 xxxx xxxxx 82 118 555 129 129 428 III t Used Cap.: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 55.3 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.3 0.0 58.6 Impedance: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 0.53 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 0.49 Actual Cap.: 635 xxxx xxxxx 540 xxxx xxxxx 21 62 555 68 68 428 I 11 II II I Level Of Service Module: -� Unused Cap.: 635 xxxx xxxxx 241 xxxx xxxxx 21 62 555 36 68 177 LOS by Move: * * * C * * * * * E * D Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT -1, ' LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 3 1492WSAM.CMD Thu Jan 12, 1995 15:34:39 Page 7-1 1492WSAM.CMD Thu Jan 12, 1995 15:34:39 Page 8-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. - PROJECT 1492 PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS PFAFFLE STREET APARTMENTS 1996 AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH SITE 1996 AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH SITE Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method 4-Way Stop Method Future Volume Alternative Future Volume Alternative Intersection #2 Site Driveway/Pfaffle St' Intersection #3 78th St/Pfaffle St Level Of Service: A Cycle (sec) : 1 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.464 Loss Time (sec) : 0 Average Delay (sec/veh) : ' 3.1 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Rights: Include Include Include Include I II II II I� Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign I II II II I Rights: Include Include Include Include Volume Module: Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 145 0 I II II II I Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Volume Module: Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 0 0 149 0 Base Vol: 30 5 5 5 50 10 10 5 150 20 105 5 Added Vol: 29 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Initial Fut: 29 0 29 0 0 0 0 113 6 6 149 0 Initial Bse: 31 5 5 5 52 10 10 5 155 21 108 5 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Added Vol: 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 3 0 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Initial Fut: 34 5 5 5 52 10 10 5 184 21 111 5 PHF Volume: 31 0 31 0 0 0 0 121 6 6 159 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Final Vol.: 31 0 31 0 0 0 0 121 6 6 159 0 PHF Volume: 36 5 5 5 55 11 11 5 195 22 118 5 Adjusted Volume Module: Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0% Reduced Vol: 36 5 5 5 55 11 11 5 195 22 118 5 % Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 % Truck/Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 36 5 5 5 55 11 11 5 195 22 118 5 Cycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx I II II 11 I Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Saturation Flow Module: Adj Vol.: 34 0 34 0 0 0 0 121 6 7 159 0 Sat/Lane: 326 326 326 153 153 153 659 659 659 823 823 823 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 « » Run Speed(E/W): 30 MPH « Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg Lanes: 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.07 0.78 0.15 0.05 0.02 0.93 0.15 0.82 0.03 Critical Gp: 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx Final Sat.: 326 163 163 11 119 24 34 16 609 125 670 28 I II II II I I II II II 1 Capacity Module: Capacity Analysis Module: Cnflict Vol: 289 289 124 323 292 159 159 xxxx xxxxx 127 xxxx xxxxx Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.03 0.03 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.18 0.18 0.18 Potent Cap.: 715 715 871 614 712 931 996 xxxx xxxxx 1000 xxxx xxxxx Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** t Used Cap.: 4.8 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.7 xxxx xxxxx I H H H 1 Impedance: xxxx 1.00 0.98 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: Actual Cap.: 715 715 871 600 712 931 996 xxxx xxxxx 1000 xxxx xxxxx Delay/Veh: 1.5 1.1 1.1 5.8 5.8 5.8 3.4 3.4 3.4 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 11 II II 1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Level Of Service Module: AdjDel/Veh: 1.5 1.1 1.1 5.8 5.8 5.8 3.4 3.4 3.4 2.0 2.0 2.0 Unused Cap.: 681 715 837 600 712 931 996 xxxx xxxxx 993 xxxx xxxxx Queue: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * A • * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 785 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx 717 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: • A * * * * * * * * * * . Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 4 • • 1(( u Name of applicant , / ' , h. 'Piy, t ,A�/n�/h L� Subject Property: Tax Map and Lot # 15 / 34' (-IC__ 7Z-- 2-47 ,.5 . Address or General Location 4J / t4)((7(4- —c° S f v . /47( AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE I, 5 f,014:14 4/ O Z( / , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed C 3 IT p1,(1 A ZeOt ..d affecting the Imp located at 5 ) f -K(/t/_ (S� ,1,ie) , and did on the er day of /.+�=E- � _ , 19 L7 personally post notice indicating/that the site may be proposed for a � � � application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at �'f 1'�d�t.�s-� /4slf (state location on property) This 2 — day of �� is 19/4 gnat • j Subscribed and sworn to, affirmed, before me this o?a) day of , 19` Y CialleAA."..Q (A) iy.iattl--) .°�. OFFICIAL SEAL Notary Public for the State of Oregon s C/jv i q j ;= = CATHERINE WHEATLEY My Commission Expires: NOTARY BUREGON COMMISSION PU NO.C-O006060 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 10,1995 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Iogin\io\postnot.cit 1 - r se 9. I Iw 1: VT; cE a. 11 a1 rn H 03.01 4 ;, i .L X ,e ��_ 160.6 �� - -c • . . -� 1e ° ".,. �� r •33.33»+ e x n .ex ` r f Z O r.tX.t �A ....0. s`.� ( =."- O + ON + *,01,1..'•.0 '• wp •• yyr ' M0O 1 '4..3.-y'fit,}'i1.• ''S• x Y° z � Kos,. g D.: I y i•1'• v., � Y Y' i• t � 0�0 ^ i • \ . • _ — ZtS� I_ .}_w_ _ . •. XVi _ . I o ' t4• uetlyEN7 IS / . . i. otolleE C.elceeeo' E:e'ee.�. ='a4-.�'- I $ Q h • 4 , „. . 5 ( - S�.4 OD ^ON •t.OtO .4! `.o. % n Y � f" 401.41 `V \ I 200 401 0 CO Oq'10•[ . goy , Cn o '8 JAy e, L Y O - i. 80.11'W ! �-/ 410..0 •I r ,•+y 40.88'4 481.01 16!.13 12 ' .'..''1, .. ,�f r.-n.t+.,.,• • I.; 1.,s1 - 1 f „ , i — 6 A N V n W v Q A p - l'. 4.} , J -r r■•i Y:2: e6 eo rz.zr l7 IN_ N0• 3 �,.Jq*•i .t1 0 J� de.77 ]L.. Mea JR..e I.]p y�� P 8 a g g f ,�' ,...-, l÷^;r to.#;,t.:es �7 �r!+ta.. ,,..iiiQpia3Aii rgma3Aamrmgrnr�, < ' ,. p . V i• 106 , 9 ee I 1 to co D r.y R 0 0 --:Nis t1•*•. - ; . n N O O f tNal • m �, ; r R. _ A s:' 1 a W 10%44 1 ee I 0 .t BEGIN 1790 CO SW 82ND /, e 4.e fe.8 N N W N A i 0 N N 0 O • • • • NOTICE OF MEETING Andrews Management is proposing a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change from CP, Commercial Professional to R-25, Multi-Family Residential at this location. Before applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, the applicants would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Friday, January 13, 1995 Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 7:00 P.M. Please note that this is an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. For additional information, call Spencer Vail at 281-8245 • • 4104 CITY OF TIGARD AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING OREGON STATE OF OREGON ) County.of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Jerree L. Gaynor, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: That I am a Department Secretary for The City of Tigard, Oregon. X That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer X Tigard City Council A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", on the 9th day of Mav, 1995: said PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE as hereto attached, was posted on an appropriate bulletin board on the n/a day of n/a and deposited in the United States Mail on the 9th day of Mav, postage prepaid. J -red Notice ' / Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the ay of h,,__ 19 tip-:v.:." - .il�• V /7/ / OFFICIAL SEAL •,, r.. RdilTdR'f PU3UC.OREGaFE �� i�:1. 1 • ' N• ARY PUB a OF OREG N ,� CC\A!,�I�;10*�r;0.008977 Mav COMMISSION x"Ri:s"E 7L1 My Commissio "xpires: q 7/9 •FILE INFO.: CPA 95-0001 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE EXHIBIT "A" PUBLIC HEAROIG NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL, 4�,� 1^+ I` AT A MEETING ON TUESDAY, MAY 30. AT 7:30 PM, '��., IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: ► COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) NO. 95-0001 ZONE CHANGE (ZON) NO. 95-0002 FILE TITLE: ANDREWS MANAGEMENT APPLICANT: Andrews Management OWNER: Arthur & Margaret Verharen 4000 SW Kruse Way Place 12435 SW 60th Building 1, Suite 270 Portland, OR 97219 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 OWNER: Paul & Anna Herberholz OWNER: McGuire, Robert/William/James/Thomas 8400 SW Pfaffle Street Powell, Sarah Tigard, OR 97223 8470 SW Pfaffle Street Tigard, OR 97223 OWNER: Oregon Department of Transportation Region 1/Property Management Office 5320 SW Macadam Portland, OR 97201 REQUEST ► A request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Map from C-P (Commercial Professional)and Low-Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential, and to change the zoning from C-P and R-4.5 to R- 25. LOCATION: South of SW Pfaffle Street at SW 83rd Avenue (WCTM 1S1 36CC, tax lots 200, 300, 400 and 2200). APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA: Comprehensive Plan Policies 2, 6, 8 and 12; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.22, 18.32 and 18.56. ZONE: Currently, two parcels (3.44 acres) are C-P and two parcels (2.07 acres) are R-4.5. The C-P zone allows groups of businesses and offices in centers to provide opportunities for employment and for business and professional services. The R-4.5 district allows single-family residential units, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, family day care, and home occupations among other uses. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. • ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICEO E AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITI'AIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR. QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 323 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD-TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE CITY COUNCIL WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE CITY COUNCIL MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER MAY 9, 1995, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE CITY COUNCIL WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE, OR FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE WITH SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY SO AS TO PROVIDE THE CITY, APPLICANT, OR OTHER PARTIES TO THE APPLICATION WITH A REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND, WILL PRECLUDE APPEAL ON SAID ISSUE TO THE STATE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS (LUBA). ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY RECORDER OR PLANNER RAY VALONE AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON. I u nn1 �� �!n 111•` _ iu I � l . ill ■ •rte II 1 il r 47 ZI I L1 (2 EN _ - 1 "%% Q . _In mi - IN , Ai 1 r0 dI it O '.1/4. • ‘.,' - 9 71, )\I��� I VICINITY EXHIBIT MAP ?. 9,. . Yo u �. �a�rr�..r m.r.e .�.,... a.a a+.a•or a..o w � rEET - - _. __ —n.ne a+.u.n ' 1CPA 95-0001/Z0N 9570002 r liA MGMT. - (Page 1 of 2) (--1 - EXHIBIT "B" °-'? 1S136CC-O0100 1S136CCl 0 BARASCBi GEORGE. - = VffiiHARBN, ARTHUR. WARD AND = • • BY GENERAL•MOTORS CORP VERBAREN, MARGARET COULTER ATTN: RON STINEBISER 12435 SW 60TH - .• . 485 WEST MILWAUKEE AVE PORTLAND OR 97219 =- I DETROIT _ MI 48202- , 1 1S136CC-00300 1S136CC-00400 . , i I HEREERHOLZ, PAUL A ANNA' MCGUIRE, -ROBERT J/WILLIAM A ' 8400 SW PFAFFLE ST SARAH A/JAMES E AND 1i TIGARD OR 97223 THOMAS P : i 8470 SW PFAFFLE ST - TIGARD OR 97223 • I 1S1360C-02200 1S135DA-00500 . - ' OREGON, STATE OF HWY DIVISION • GRAHAM, DON G AND BY IiEAVES,-RICHARD E BROSSIA,• PAUL F- ON'BLDG • - 11260 SW HALL BLVD SALEM OR 97310 - • TIGARD - OR 97223 . • 1Sy3SDA-00700 1S135DA-01000• B8OSSIA, PAUL F AND •�, SUFFER. DONALD N . GRAHAM,. DON -G. MUMS, MICHAEL T 11260 SW HALL BLVD 14520 SW BULL MT RD TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND . •• ' OR 97282 1S135DA-01100 1S135DA-01200 SCHAEFFER, DONALD M MUNCH, MICHAEL T AND • MUNCH, MICHAEL T - SCHAEFFER, DONALD M • 14520 SW BULL MT RD 14520 SW BULL MT -RD TIGARD Ux 91224 TIGARD OR 9:224 ' 1S136C8-00890 1S136C8-00900 ' - BECKMAN, PAUL D AND DEBORAH R GROSHART, .JAY ROBERT AND ' 8485 SW PFAFFLE BETTY R . TIGARD OR 97223 .. • 8465 SW PFAFFLE TIGARD ' OR 97223 • 1S136C8-01000 1S136C8-01900 . COWLEY, TRUMAN G-. - : : PFAFFLE, HELEN N TR - 8395 SW PFAFFLE ST • 8225 SW PFAFFLE TIGARD OR 97223 • TIGARD OR• 97223 • 1S136C8-02900 1S13601-03000 • ROBERTS, DAVID H/IDA MAE BOTTELIN, MICHBL - • 8355 SW PFAFFLE _ •� - - - 11295 SW 83RD • TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD . : OR 97223 1S136CB-03100 1S136CB-06300 DAVIDSON, ROBERT C MOLLIE - OLLISON, RANDY L AND -_ 11265 SW 83RD - •• CINDY A TIGARD OR 97223 11290 SW 83RD TIGARD OR 97223 1S136CB-06400 1S136C8-06500 HOILAND, STEPHAN A/JENNY C WICK, MURRAY A 11320 SW 83RD 4460 ALHAMBRA STREET TIGARD OR 97223 SAN DIEGO CA I:- 14 • • O Exhibit "B" b` March 27, 1995 CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT ' . e 2 of 2 - Andrews Management 4000 SW Kruse Way Place Arthur & Margaret Verharen Belding 1, Suite.270 12435 SW 60th Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Portland, OR 97219 McGuire, Robert/William/James/Thomas Paul&Anna Herberholz Powell, Sarah 8400 SW Pfaffie•Street 8470 SW Pfaffie Street Tigard, OR 97123 Tigard, OR 97223 Oregon Department of Transportation Spencer Vail Region 1/Property.Management Office. Planning Consultant 5320 SW Macadam 4505 N.E.24th Avenue Portland,OR 97201 Portland, OR 97211 0 _ _- -_ lir.....m......mism m _ L I I I I I I ► I ► I - SPRUCE S SPRU( I 1 J . 91 Illarar41111111.111 t. i - • ThORNST J Al MIL<,.� 4 AM 0, -< I _ rilliiiimillkois = co El Ilia - - I i 1111 � H CL ;lir 11111. 71= mo UJ CI iII14.. II or Z ■ III Nig ?': PFAFFLE ST Z ■ MI IL, o > CC icE or . LI 44 1011 Irk �- g•V EL 0 ' * 7,. 10 0 INF IA*, (..) ,iik, .4P'4.414‘4 g`t4 Will VICINITY EXHIBIT MAP 1.............J CHANGE TON MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND ; ' ZONE CHANGE FROM R-4.5 TO R-25 %/i'A CHANGE FROM C PETO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN NO-TH MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND Scale 1%400' ZONE CHANGE FROM C-P TO R-25 FEET A REFER TO STAFF REPORT 0 400 80 0 - TIGARD CITY LIMITS Ik\G ISDAT\TIOCOVXNELSOWO\RAYCPA.DWO 3/14/95 • • • • CITY OF TIGARD OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) • I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: That I am a Senior Office Assistant for The City of Tigard, Oregon. X That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director X Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", on the 27i day of March, 1995; said PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER as hereto attached, was posted on an appropriate bulletin board on the 27th day of March, 1995 and deposited in the United States Mail on the 27th day of March, 1995, postage prepaid.Al tAât i rar�: ice / Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 7/day of 195. tiFFtCfAL 5E,'•d_ , (73m M-./E.LDER14S i / i/ r4,4: P`JOTARYPUB IC-OREGON •"" NOTARY PUB - OF OREG N COMMISSION P-10-OOB477 M COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.y, 3 My Commissio i xpires: Q' 7 f FILE INFO.: (CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR 4/17 PLANNING COMMISSION MTG.) • • j Exhibit "A" : CITY OF .TIGARD • - PUBLIC HEARING �. • NOTICE CITY OF TIGAR: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION,AT ITS MEETING ON MONDAY, APRIL 17. 1995 AT 7:30 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGAR[ OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: ■ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT(CPA) NO. 95-0001 ZONE CHANGE (ZON) NO. 95-0002 FILE TITLE: ANDREWS MANAGEMENT APPLICANT: Andrews Management OWNER: Arthur& Margaret Verharen 4000 SW Kruse Way Place 12435 SW 60th Building 1, Suite 270 Portland, OR.97219 ' Lake Oswego, OR 97035 OWNER: Paul & Anna Herberholz OWNER: McGuire, Robert/William/James/Thomas 8400 SW Pfaffle Street Powell, Sarah Tigard, OR 97223 8470 SW Pfaffle Street Tigard, OR 97223 OWNER: Oregon Department of Transportation Region 1/Property Management Office 5320 SW Macadam Portland, OR 97201 REQUEST ■ A request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Map from C-P(Commercial Professional) and • Low-Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential, and to change the zoning from C-P and R-4.5 to R-25. LOCATION: - South of SW Pfaffle Street at SW 83rd Avenue (WCTM 151 36CC, tax lots 200, 300, 400 and 2200). APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA: Comprehensive Plan Policies 2, 6, 8 and 12; and Community Development Code Chapters 18.22, 18.32 and 18.56. ZONE: Currently, two parcels (3.44 acres) are C-P and two parcels (2.07 acres) are R-4.5. The C-P zone allow groups of businesses and offices in centers to provide opportunities for employment and for business an professional services. The R-4.5 district allows single-family residential units, public swoon facilitie residential treatment homes, farming, family day care, and home occupations among other uses. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 0 THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCI AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOI TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST PLEASE CALL(503) 639-4171, EXTENSION 320 (VOICE)OR (503) 684-2772, (TOO -TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR TH' DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO O' AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, TH CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 ANDERSON MANAGEMENT Man:11 27.1995 PLANNING COMMISSION WIL t•A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATIO .•HE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBI HEARING;AND INVITE BOTH 0 AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBI HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TA. ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS_EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER MARCH _ 1995.ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTI AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE-HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEF SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST,ASSIMILATED FROM THE TIGA; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.. ,.APPROVAL, OR DISAPPROVAL-OF-T= REQUEST BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA, AND THESE CRITERIA ONl AT THE HEARING, IT IS IMPORTANT THAT ANY COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO T: APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO CONCLUSION OF THE HEARING ON TI REQUEST, OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY RESPOND TO THE ISSUE, PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO TF.IE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS (LUBA) BASED ON THAT ISSUI ' ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO CO, COPIES MAY BE OBTAINED FOR THE SAME AT THE COST OF TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (254) PER PAGE. AT LEAST-SEVEN DA' PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECT ION AT NO COST OR A CO; MAY BE OBTAINED AT THE COST OF TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (254) PER PAGE. • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER RAY VALONE AT (503) 639-4171, EXTENSION 336 AT TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223-8144. —AleiCid—'JT�1 n ..�W��� 1 ... . _ .. mmi a.� i iig �l•`'= W =Elm Rim INNLNII 113 I- -� Z II No I vs - r'cf j a. = I j�, c cc • < • p MO I , , gri 0S, ,_ 4- 0 IL 1 ! I1 a ' % / ■Iju ,,,. al > H _ - NIA&- r% ;?Olisp,A0 NAOS VICINITY EXHIBIT MAP =%O"` nNO M EOM Owwce MOON R...$TO R.a rail �."°a' 1 "" . I*C O TY M WI C*Mfi Fi ON CJ TO 44S -EET A wet ro srw■REPORT 0 400 . d00 MOM,TOMO an t T3 CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 ANDERSON MANAGEMENT MarCh 27.1995 CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 SRE[S1GMT. (Page 1 of2410 • EXHIBIT "B" 181360C-00100 - 1S136CC-00200 % BARASCH, GEORGE - . - - - - VERHAREN, ARTHUR WARD AND . BY GENERAL MOTORS CORP VERHAREN, MARGARET COULTER t►1-LiA: RON STI NGo rz 12/!25 TH SW 6Q_.- 485 WEST MILWAUKEE AVE PORTLAND OR 97219 DETROIT - MI 48202` 1S136CC-00300 1S136CC-00400 HERBERHOLZ, PAUL A ANNA MCGUIRE, ROBERT J/WILLIAM A 8400 SW PFAFFLE ST SARAH A/JAMES E AND • TIGARD OR 97223 • THOMAS P 8470 SW PFAFFLE ST .- TIGARD OR 97223 1S136CC-02200 1S135DA-00500 OREGON, STATE OF HWY DIVISION GRAHAM, DON G AND . BY BRAVES, RICHARD E BROSSIA, PAUL F TRANSPORATION.BLDG 11260 SW HALL BLVD SALEM OR 97310 TIGARD - OR 97223 1S135DA-00700 1S135DA-01000 BROSSIA, PAUL F AND SCHAEFFER, DONALD K GRAHAM, DON G . MUNCH, MICHAEL T 11260 SW HALL BLVD - • 14520 SW BULL MT RD TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97282--- 1S135DA-01100 1S135DA-01200 ' SCHAEFFER, DONALD M MUNCH, MICHAEL T AND MUNCH, MICHAEL T SCHAEFFER, DONALD K 14520 SW BULL MT RD . 14520 SW BULL MT RD TIGARD Ott 94224 TIGARD OR 97224 1S136CB-00890 1S136CB-00900 . BECKHAM, PAUL D AND DEBORAH R GROSHART, -JAY ROBERT AND 8485 SW PFAFFLE BETTY R TIGARD OR 97223 8465 SW PFAFFLE • TIGARD OR 97223 • 1S136CB-01000 1S136CB-01900 - COWLEY, TRUMAN G - PFAFFLE, HELEN N TR • 8395 SW PFAFFLE ST 8225 SW PFAFFLE TIGARD OR 97223 • TIGARD OR 97223 1S136CB-02900 1S136CB-03000 ROBERTS, DAVID H/IDA MAE BOTTELIN, MICHEL - • 8355 SW PFAFFLB _ - 11295 SW 83RD . TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 . - 1S136CB-03100 1S136CB-06300 DAVIDSON, ROBERT C MOLLIE - OLLISON, RANDY L AND 11265 SW 83RD CINDY A . TIGARD OR 97223 • - 11290 SW 83RD TIGARD OR 97223 1S136C3-06400 1S136CB-06500 HOILAND, STEPHAN A/JENNY C WICK, MURRAY A 11320 SW 83RD 4460 ALHAMBRA STREET TIGARD OR 97223 SAN DIEGO CA 92107 • •. • • . . Exhibit B" h:VoginVatty\cpa95-0LIbs ,March 27, 1995 CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT '• !e 2 of 2 Andrews Management 4000 SW Kruse Way Place Arthur & Margaret Verharen Building 1, Suite 270 12435 SW 60th Lake Oswego, OR 97035 •-Portland, OR 97219 McGuire, Robert/William/James/Thomas Paul & Anna Herberholz • Powell, Sarah 8400 SW Pfaffie Street • 8470 SW Pfaffie Street Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Oregon Department of Transportation Spencer Vail Region 1/Property Management Office. Planning Consultant 5320 SW Macadam 4505 N.E. 24th Avenue Portland, OR 97201 Portland, OR 97211 CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 paws MGMT. (Page 1 of 2) 0 EXHIBIT "B". . 1S136CC-00100 1S136CC-00200 BARASCH, GEORGE _. .VERHAREN, ARTHUR WARD .AND - - BY GENERAL MOTORS CORP VERHAREN, MARGARET COULTER . . ATTN: RON STINEBISER 12435 SW 60TH 485 WEST MILWAUKEE AVE PORTLAND OR 97219 DETROIT _ MI 48202 - 1S136CC-00300 1S136CC-00400 HERBERHOLZ, PAUL A ANNA MCGUIRE, .ROBERT J/WILLIAM A 8400 SW PFAFFLE ST SARAH A/JAMES E AND • TIGARD OR 97223 THOMAS P • 8470 SW PFAFFLE ST TIGARD OR 97223 1S136CC-02200 1S135DA-00500 OREGON, STATE OF HWY DIVISION GRAHAM, DON G AND •BY REAVES, RICHARD E BROSSIA, PAUL F TRANSPORATION.BLDG 11260 SW HALL BLVD SALEM OR 97310 TIGARD OR 97223 1S135DA-00700 1S135DA-01000 BROSSIA, PAUL F 'AND SCHAEFFER, DONALD M GRAHAM, DON G MUNCH, MICHAEL T 11260 SW HALL BLVD - 14520 SW BULL MT RD TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97282 1S135DA-01100 1S135DA-01200 SCHAEFFER, DONALD M MUNCH, MICHAEL T AND . MUNCH, MICHAEL T SCHAEFFER, DONALD M . 14520 SW BULL MT RD 14520 SW BULL MT RD . TIGARD OR 9%224 TIGARD OR 97224 1S136C8-00890 1S136CB-00900 • BECKHAM, PAUL D AND DEBORAH R GROSHART, .JAY ROBERT AND • 8485 SW PFAFFLE BETTY R TIGARD OR 97223 8465 SW PFAFFLE • . TIGARD OR 97223 1S136CB-01000 1S136CB-01900 COWLEY, TRUMAN G - PFAFFLE, HELEN N TR 8395 SW PFAFFLE ST 8225 SW PFAFFLE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S136CB-02900 1S136CB-03000 ROBERTS, DAVID H/IDA MAE BOTTELIN, MICHEL . 8355 SW PFAFFLE _ 11295 SW 83RD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S136CB-03100 1S136CB-06300 . DAVIDSON, ROBERT C MOLLIE OLLISON, RANDY L AND 11265 SW 83RD CINDY A . TIGARD OR 97223 - - 11290 SW 83RD TIGARD OR 97223 1S136CB-06400 1S136CB-06500 HOILAND, STEPHAN A/JENNY C WICK, MURRAY A 11320 SW 83RD 4460 ALHAMBRA STREET TIGARD OR 97223 SAN DIEGO CA 92107 • Exhibit 'B" h:\login\patty\cpa95-0l.1bs March V, 1995 CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT • . e 2 of 2 Andrews Management 4000 SW Kruse Way Place Arthur & Margaret Verharen Building 1, Suite 270 12435 SW 60th Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Portland, OR 97219 McGuire, Robert/William/James/Thomas Paul & Anna Herberholz Powell, Sarah 8400 SW Pfaffle Street 8470 SW Pfaffle Street Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Oregon Department of Transportation Spencer Vail Region 1/Property Management Office. Planning Consultant 5320 SW Macadam 4505 N.E. 24th Avenue Portland, OR 97201 Portland, OR 97211 - • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) SS CITY OF TIGARD ) 1, 'Pev►cP� (1 , Vi4;L , being duly sworn, depose and say that on cfetrit.ec a_ , 19 of , I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at Akt4Rec,L)S ,{4 i�. 5.4 o,7 5441. P f 4f k , a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office at —177A49 with postage prepaid thereon. Subscribed and sworn to before me this of _ -'- -�_ 19 %1�' . S Y(;t/4e/Lk) Notary Public �//D 4S My Commission Expires: (( [ ! ■ OFFICIAL SEAL CAE WHEATLEY NOTARY THERIN PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.006060 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 10, 1995 h:\Iogin\jo\affmail.cit 1S136CB 06400 4111S136CB 06500 •1S136CB 06500 Stephan and Jenny Hoiland Murry A. Wick OCCUPANT 1.1320 SW 83rd 4460 Alhambra At. 8275 SW PFAFFLE Tigard, Or 97223 San Diego, CA. 92107 TIGARD, OR 07223 1S136CC 00100 1S136CC 00100 1S136CC 02200 STEPHEN BARASCH GM Training Center Ore.Dept.of Trans. 13836 RIVLOI DR. 11765 SW PACIFIC HWY 5320 SW Macadam PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL TIGARD, OR 97223 Portland, Ore 97201 33410 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 8565 SW Pfaffle #1 8565 SW PFAFFLE #2 8565 SW PFAFFLE #3 Tigard, Or 97223 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 8565 SW PFAFFLE #4 8565 SW PFAFFLE #5 OCCUPANT TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 8565 SW PFAFFLE #6 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 8565 SW PFAFFLE #7 8565 SW PFAFFLE #8 8565 SW PFAFFLE #9 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TIGARD, OREGON. 97223 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 8565 SW PFAFFLE #10 8565 SW PFAFFLE #11 8565 SW PFAFFLE #12 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 1S136CC 00300 1S136CC 00200 1S136CC 00400 Paul & Anna Herberholz Margaret C. Verharen,Tr Robt. J Mcguire et al 8400 SW Pfaffle 12535 SW 60th 8470 SW Pfaffle Tigard, Oregon 97223 Portland, Or 97219 Tigard, Or 97223 1S136CB 00900 1S136CB 01000 1S136CB 01900 Jay Robert Groshart Truman G. Cowley Helen N. Pfaffle, Tr 8465 SW Pfaffle 8395 SW Pfaffle 8225 SW Pfaffle Tigard, Or 97223 Tigard, Or 97223 Tigard, Or 97223 1S136CB 02900 1S136BC 03000 1S136BC 03100 David and Ida Roberts Michel Bottelin Robert Davidson 8355 SW Pfaffle 11295 SW 83rd 11265 SW 83rd Tigard, Or 97223 Tigard, Or 97223 Tigard, Or 97223 1S136CB 06300 1S136CB 00890 Randy 011ison Paul and Deborah Beckman 11290 SW 83rd 8485 SW Pfaffle Tigard, 97223 Tigard, Or 97223 1S136DA 00500 411 •1S136DA 00700 Don Graham OCCUPANT Paul F. Brossia 11260 SW Hall Blvd. 11220 SW Hall Blvd. 11260 SW Hall Blvd.. Tigard, Or 97223 Tigard, Or 97223 Tigard, Or 97223 1S136DA 01100 1S136DA 01200 Donald Schaeffer Occupant Michael Munch PO Box 82549 8530 SW Pfaffle 14520 SW Bull Mt Rd. Portland, Or 97282 Tigard,Or 97223 Tigard, Or 97223 Andrews Management east cit Ron Naff Attn: Phil McHugh 18641 SW Benfield 823.5 SW Oleson Rd, Mary Swintek Lake Oswego, Or 97035 Suite C 9915 SW Frewing #23 Portland, Or 97221 Tigard, Or 97223 east cit east cit east cit Craig Hopkins Mark F. Mahon Joel Stevens 7430 SW Varns 11310 SW 91st Ct 9660 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 SW Ventura Ct. Tigard, Or 97223 FENCER VAIL 0 PLAIOING CONSULTANT December 29, 1994 Re: Andrews Management Proposed Plan Amendment and Zone Change Dear Interested Party I represent the property owners and optional purchasers of property on the south side of SW Pfaffle between the Cellular One facility on the west, at SW Hall and the GM Training Center complex on the east. Specifically, the properties involved are Tax Lot 200, 300, 400 and 2200 on Map 1S136CC. (see enclosed map) We are considering a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change for these lots from the existing CP, Commercial Professional, -to R-25, Multi-Family Residential at the above location. Before to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to a meeting on: Friday, January 13, 1995 Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Tigard, Oregon 97223 7:00 PM Please note that this will be an informational meeting on the Preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to submittal to the city. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you at the meeting. Please call me if you have any questions regarding the proposal. Very truly yourlik l( II, /2 /Pencer H. Vail encl • 4505 N.E. 24TH AVENUE • PORTLAND, OREGON 97211 • 503/281-8245 • FAX 503/284-5506 ,• • • CITY OF TIGARD PRE-AP LOCATION CONFERENCE NOTES DATE: / 2-2 9 2/ STAFF: L2-66.1-etfr. ( �1: •ev1C e� la I- ( 4;/4"62)"174 / ✓Y�o(�'Phon� 4's/— r�S2-�/ Ph nee: I/ PROPERTY LOCATION ii/. 5;),5-ADDRESS: no TAX MAP & TAX LOT: S( -? L l' (i )c NECS33� -Y APPLIRF►TION(S) : r�ii-e i� �""' PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: ki) 17, +0 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: G t2( ?Ai€ Pir'o O�S��j�c0e ZONING DESIGNATION: t'iC vvl e:/r ,r, 1 Pp?,Pes-, ire CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM #_Z5#_.Zit ;Y CHAIRPERSON: Gy - PHONE: ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL • :QUIREMENT� /}�� Minimum lot size: ft. S,, Minimum lot width: ft. <ee- 44-00 Setbacks: front ' side ft. rear ft. garage ilk corner ft. from street. Maximum site coverage: Minimum landscaped or n-' ural v etation area: Maximum building heigh t. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIO REQUIR:414. S Minimum lot frontag- • 25 fee unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. ots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of ontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access easement. Maximum lot depth to idth r=tio of ,2.5 to 1. SPECIAL SETBACKS Streets: ft. from c-nterline of Established areas: ft. from Lower intensity zone ft. , along the site's boundary Flag lot: 10 foot sided setback. Zero lot line lots: mini-um 10 foot separation between buildings. Multi-family residential •u ding separation: See Code Section 18.96.030. Accessory structures • to 528 quare feet in size may be permitted on lots less than 2.5 a• es in size - 5 ft. minimum setback from side and rear lot lines. Accessory structure p to 1000 sq. ft. ,on parcels of at least 2.5 acres in size - See applicab, e zoning district setbacks for primary structures. Page 1 • • • BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Maximum height of 30 feet in R-1, R-2, R-3.5 and R-4.5 zones Maximum height of 35 feet in R-7 and R 12 zones /'—Maxintiim Height of 45 feet in the R-25 zone �Maximutn Height-of-60_.feet_in_the-R-40--zone- FLAG LOT BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Maximum height of 1-1/2 stories or 25 feet, whichever is less in most zones; 2-1/2 stories, or 35 feet in R-7, R-12, R-25 or R-40 zones provided that the standards of Code Section 18.98.030(B) are met. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATION - Community Development Code Chapter 18.92 specifies that the Net Residential Units allowed on a particular site may be calculated by dividing the net area of the developable land by the minimum number .f square feet required per dwelling unit as specified by the applicab e zoning designation. Net development area is calculated by subtracting th- following land area(s) from the gross site area: • 1. All sensitive lands areas including - Land within the 100 year floodplain - Slopes exceeding 25% - Drainageways 2. Land dedicated for park purposes 3. Public right-of-way dedication 4. All land to be provided for private streets (include- accessways through parking areas) RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TRANSFER The City of Tigard allows a Residential Density Transfer of up to 25% of the units that could otherwise have been developed on sensitive lands areas listed in (1) above which may be applied to the developable portion of the site (Code Section 18.92.030) . It is the responsibility of the applicant for a residential development application to provide a detailed calculation for both the permitted residential density and the requested density transfer. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TRANSITION '� Regardless of the allowed housing density in a zoning district, any property within 100 feet of a designated established area shall not be developed at a density greater than 125 percent of the maximum Comprehensive Plan designation (not zoning) of the adjacent parcel. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP IN SOLAR ACCESS REQUIREMENTS All subdivisions and minor partitions are subject to solar access requirements. The-e requirements state that a minimum of 80% of all lots created must be or'ented for solar accessibility. The basic standard, which determines so -r accessibility, requires that 80 % of total number of proposed lots: 1) demonstrate a north-south dimension of at least 90 feet; and 2) demonstrate a front lot line orientation within 30 degrees of a true east-west axis. The total or partial exemp•ion of a site from the solar access requirement may be approved for the fol owing reasons: - East, west or north s .pes steeper than 20%. - Off-site shade sources (structures, vegetation, topography) . - On-site shade sources (vegetation) . ' Page 2 ,---, • • Adjustment allowing a reduction of the 80% solar lot design requirement may be made or the following reasons: - Reduc density or an increased cost of at least five percent due to eit er: * e st, west or north slope greater than 10%, * si ificant natural feature, * exi ting road or lotting pattern, * pub is easement or right-of-way. - Reduction in important development amenities. - Pre-existin shade (vegetation) . PLEASE NOTE: Maps and text are required which are sufficient to show that the development com-li`es with-the solar desi- standards, or that specific lots should be exempt-• or adjusted out. The following items shall be included in the analysi: : a. The north-south lot dimension and front lot line orientation of each proposed lot; b. Protected solar b ilding lines and relevant building site restrictions, if appdcable; c. For the purpose of id- tifying trees related to exemption requests, a map showing existin- trees which are at least 30 feet tall and over 6 inches diamete• at a point 4 feet above grade shall be submitted. This map s -11 including their height, diameter, and species, and a statement .eclaring that they are to be retained; and d. Copies of all private res rictions relating to solar access. The design characteristics of a developed solar-oriented lot are high levels of wintertime sun striking he south walls and roofs of the house, house orientation maximizing south window area, and a south-sloping roof area. To achieve this, one may utilize the following: b. Protected Solar Building Line: The solar building line must a) be oriented to within 30 degrees o a true east-west axis, b) provide a minimum distance of 70 feet .rom the middle of the lot to the. south property line, and c) provide a minimum distance of 45 feet from the northernmost buildable b.undary of the subject lot to the north property line. c. Performance Options: There are two p rformance options which may be utilized. The first option requires 6 e house to be oriented within 30 degrees of an east-west axis and ha a at least 80% of the ground floor's south wall protected from shade The second option requires that at least 32% of the glass and 500 quare feet of the roof area face south and be protected from shade. Please contact the Building Division for further 'nformation regarding the Protected Solar Building Line and Performance Options relating to building height and construction. Page 3 • • PARKING AND ACCESS Required automobile parking: spaces per dwelling unit. - r-dwe-wing-unit-is_ QUired - Multiple family units with more than 2 bedrooms require two parking spaces per unit. Multi-family dwelling units with more than 10 required spaces shall provide a minimum of 15% of the required parking for guest use. No more than 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: - Standard parking space dimensions: 8 ft. 8 inches X 18 ft. - Compact parking space dimensions: 8 ft. X 15 ft. Handicapped parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, .are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) . A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. Bicycle racks are required for multi-family, commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every 15 vehicular parking spaces. All parking areas and driveways must be paved. Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: Maximum access width: Pedestrian access must be provided between building entrances and parking areas, outdoor common areas, and public sidewalks and streets. A minimum of one tree for every seven parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses, see Development Code Chapters 18.100, 18.106 and 18.108. CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. Page 4 • • BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only, be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in Code Chapter 18.100. The required buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area: ft. along north boundary ft. along east boundary ft. along south boundary ft. along west boundary In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along STREET TREES Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two inches when measured four feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the tree at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained Planning Division. SIGNS Sign permits must be obtained prior to installation of any sign in the • City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. SENSITIVE LANDS Code Chapter 18.84 provi es regulations for lands which are potentially unsuitable for developmen , due to areas within the 100-year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetl'' d areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. Sta will attempt to preliminarily identify sensitive lands areas at the p e-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the res nsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas, and their boundarie , is the responsibility of the applicant. Page '5 • • Areas meeting the definit ,ons of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with th development application. Chapter 18.84 also provide regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive 1 nds areas. Residential development is prohibited within floodplains. In most cases, dedication of 100-year floodplain areas to the City for ark and open space areas is required as a condition of the approval of a evelopment application. ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS a � s (A.),wl,� �� r fiteot a .5- e- d -es---u Zia ve 3t-t e 914 a 1/liI cz o� C L �Cnt/ ©✓- aV- te/ ri We-5S C GCA / u 1 vvi t&'h t k cQsc 6 v I £A JC3 dWrett P ROCEDURE Administrative staff re -Yew. �f Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member at the Community Development Department counter at City Hall. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week's applications. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One 8.5 inch by 11 inch map of a proposed proiect should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will preform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 10 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify an applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are needed. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning Page 6 • • • staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10 day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that- should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. Another pre-application conference is required if an application is to be submitted more than six months after this pre-application conference, unless the second conference is deemed unnecessary by the Planning Division. • PREPARED BY: PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: 639-4171 Page 7 • • PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: (1) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions; (2) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns; and (3) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. an e79 /04. 79; - - Right-o wav edication: The City of Tig rd requires that land area be dedicated to the public: 1) to increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or 2) for the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of- way dedication for: 1. p to feet from centerline. 2. to feet from centerline. 3. to feet from centerline. Street improvements: 1. /- � street improvements will be necessary along P 2. street improvements will be necessary along 3. Street improvements shall include feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department) , a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District) , necessary street signs, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the street improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non- remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district formed to improve: 1. OtiOerZ4/60e °Ii°14-441.7 047,407f5r Page 8 04. my -�� • 2. Pedestrianways/bikeways: Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located in P The proposed development must be connected to a sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to extend the sewer along the proposed development site's Water Supply: The / v Water District (Phone: provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, 252-2506) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. t`.6a►t/ 'j47-1- 045916p. Other Agency Permits: Storm sewer improvements: 4j2 ���` •eql/Vy STORMWATER QUALITY FEES The Unified Sewerage Agency has established, and the City has agreed to enforce, Resolution No. 90-43 Surface Water Management Regulations which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. At the discretion of the City, the applicant may be offered an opportunity to pay a fee in lieu of the construction of such a facility. The resolution requires the construction of a water quality facility and/or the payment of a fee. The fee shall be based upon the amount of impervious surface; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $285.00. The City of Tigard shall determine if a fee may be paid or a facility shall be constructed. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. 174age 9'0�/ • • STREET OPENING PERMIT _ • No work shall be preformed within a public right-of-way, or shall commence, until the applicant has obtained a street opening permit from the Engineering Department. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS All projects that require a grading plan also require that the applicant shall submit. a typical floor plan for each lot. This floor plan shall indicate the elevations of the four corners of that plan along with elevations at the corner of each lot. if PREPARED B ENGINEERING DIVISION • PHONE: 639-4171 Page 10 • . • LAND USE APPLICATION FEE SCHEDUI. • APPEALS Director's Decision to Planning Commission 235.00 costs Planning CommissionMearings Off.to Council 315.00 +transcript J_ SISTINE PERMfTS----:�_. .._ _ .T___ 125.00 - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSING ----� Tex only, Map only,or both 675.00 C'7 COND t SE-PROCESSING-- / 52-- Conditional Use Review 365.00 FLEXIBLE SETBACK STANDARDS 80.00 HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICT 8000 HOME OCCUPATION _7 . TYPE I 50.00-•N Z TYPE II 10.00 INTERPRETATION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE 55.00 by Community Development Department - LAND PARTITION Residential and Non-residential - 235.00 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT _ 50 00 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING Conceptual and detailed plan review 500.00 SENSITIVE LANDS Flood plain 520.00 Wetlands/Steep slopes/Drainageway . : 235.00 SIGN CODE EXCEPTIONS 230.00 SIGN PERMIT 0-24 sq.ft. 10.00 24-100 sq.ft. 25.00 100+sq.ft. 35.00 Temporary signs 10.00 each sign SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Under$10,000 80.00 $10,000-$99,999 155.00 $100,000-$499,999 315.00 $500,000-$999,999 415.00 $1,000,000 or more 520.00 +$1 per$10,000 SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT 415.00 +$5/LOT Subdivision Variance, if needed 105.00 TEMPORARY USE Director's Decision 50.00 Special exemptior.Mon-Profit -0- TREE REMOVAL PERMIT -0- VACATIONS Streets and public access 300.00 deposit - actual VARIANCE costs charged Administrative . 80.00 Sign Code 230.00 ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATIONS Less than 10 acres 520.00 c________lOv�res or more _ __ 625.00 ZONE CHANGE PROCESSING _ Less than 10 acres 520.00 0 acres or more 625.00 , ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT JOINT APPUCATION PLANNING FEE 100%of highest planning fee plus 10%of all additional planning fees related to the proposal. _ Approved by City Council Effective 2/1/91 fi..d,.e /., r,/ • , /5 „. .... . ./. :• ,r. .. . . / . ... ..- rn • .._, .• m ...• / ....1.2,rt x • r• / . fj4 K .* ,•••::::...t•• t / f:•., .. .. A' . ... • ,..• . • • , ,, c>. c. t,0 ///5 .•., / 0 10 10 / Q I • , . . . •• , 0.• / 0.i ,• •:,••. 0,i ......, ks , .• • , . . . . ,•••• ..*,,,,iiik ) , • / 1 * ,••• "." .... / I ../.\\ `41.„ ..... .... 4> 1 ......- •A oy . . . 1 . u, 4 •-... fi.. 1 • _. . i h...) , . 0 00•• .,'A 1 //. / / Z1•••• Ut. A' . A•' 0. 1,4:l4)' A i /7 *'•''. al A''''"*"" .., A• !,. & er\-Le A N. r1 ` •" *'be i i' 'A • 4€0.90 , ! ••• - S 0°3e5 r ......1 L • S,S.,4-5 0 I 1 • 4 4* '11 I.• .• t) k. •s„ 0,, i • S, ..rt \+ ..„ ., I . * •I .0 •0: tn. '7 On \ (.6 1\„)• . rn .•• k.... 0 )0.., ••,., ,„ n. ,-, a •••••\ •:. • 0 1 •• i. \ 0 • . A 1 . •.: `, t 4 ri. 5 i ‹ • t --- i 5 . *14 r.iv _.." ' ...5•D I.. .,, . r., . . , ...,_ *.,•• /5„/"/ ikol141 tsi e.. . . .* .,,. '9 \ \ 0 , •0 ‘ B AA A d.../5.• -I t ttt°57.- tt K ..., •. .. rn \ . . • \ • • • A ‘NC:*•• .„............,„,.„..--,A ' 4, i , ,,......./. •'.1' ,,......--- - ,„, 1,07, \ 64 4 11.......^-*••••••--• .. °." .• , * \ \NO X••* • 't„,c, I , , ,......0..a•'• 0 24 4,1 l?.:5,......."°••'••-•'..'--....- k ,,......./I . ......., 9.22 S.9, .0/".z... S • V.C‘) •...:\ YA., \ 0. \ AMIN *'+r l''' ' : .' . f { I M . ;:.... yin .0 ,, i f85°6x`t 263`.6 2400 3 b y , - , Y 4247021.2 166.6 7 . .. %.�' w-....m .. w..». .. --7 Li W ° I - - ••x.s 2401 z 00 • 0 t7,;' W b .. - 6655 sfs64 2+E .+ :: :'" 266.62 . .: : ' 2402 ? .44 AC. r • IC .-_._ tt 2300 E . .92 AC M ACRES 4 a ` 24 VACATE E-rzGEF?� , ivi_, . ti s g •:',-,: . .• Yah ce 90 \ i tt °A2c _ t . .. = d tsar y{urso rit li....::.:.:.,,,,::,,:i,..::::,:,:.::'A::::;.:!.:.'::%.\:.\.:;:::.:.•.:.: is. ' . :. . . .. -- - 2-20 0 T ' " # ».r :�`6 ...... d` I c. * i T'''rl „ �r �c 210C .62 AC. 700 T x ',� sAC ffi :.....:7'' - - . l<>. bow 4C ,.s. . d' 4 , ••,��:f r ti! 'Gf 40 1 t MAP a { Is - ., „ . 4 1.0' P 1 "s* 9Q0 o- R\s„:: 18 s i t .1 -4 / - ssa t ts ...... ,s.„, of SW AFL T. zx 1.27 i ,1100 ['moo 1.34 4G: : MAP QI o 'SCC - etc � � " r N E. tos.w 1700 • �(}(} piss** 9 .25 A / QA `` (s` — 1600 . 40.E Yafl s. t P QY m r« .Lf 3 R 4d C��`i l L3 1, 5... 1 IX p t it . E,..= #, 4,1Z ip 6 ♦• + {3 w Zt 4411.111111111 . , a i '-" 209 a I r i t::E t r `� -J xi (i 0 "0 'ed feA use w 44 CV °` s k Z. yp - 223 + 61.36.... . #!R�11�) ,R X e C s. _..w,_. �x . 2' . . _ �• — 4 ►' TEVE STRE s 6 o to g 7 • i ''1 4 . I:3 I . et V I . 1' O I. '44.,,,: 2 M 1 c P • .a { .. �t�o - , rtAt, i 6 PI Li #w— s. ------ 3 5 ry_ 32C0 4, ..s --r 4 , ti. Cii ` z Cra - a r 1' s C QtIfl n i (� Y M 4r Se a 0 6600 fT it .,4 *4-43136 zs. z 1yy it)FAFFLE EE MA S 56C P 003 229 636 „. Receipt for Certified Mail No Insurance Coverage Provided POSTAL mammon Do not use for International Mail MIMI (See Reverse/ Sent to /)/ _DP o,(',mod 12 Vei 01-x/. Street and No /t7 (> "r/51/-4 N' 44,0.,Sta a and ZIP Code ,o/,onn OOn. 977te DSR ostage y • 5 ,,S • Certified Fee 1 \_ Special Delivery Fee . k. \\\l Restricted Delivery Fee f W Return Receipt Showing i 0) to Whom&Date Delivered o Return Receipt Showing tv^Whom, \ •\^ Date,and Addressee's Address TOTAL Postage r� •c &Fees (-5-1-1 /77 !mil �. 7 Ea; Postmark or Da`C° A n ` , en ` E 17 jr 16 LL ° 1995 ,: ; v SENDER: :c114.. -�_ ; • Complete items 1 and/or 2 for a itionaervices. - aig8°` he ((iy m • Complete items 3,and 4a&b. `S coi O '-°' -�4ofttJiiirig 4forl extra m ii • Print your name and address o Cate revee'of the rm so that we-cao�„ e r �_- .�j CD return this card to you. J -�� m • Attach this form to the front o toe mr) ggvRo the back if spac� 1 n_d asses s�AA rke�s y et. does not permit. S to t • Write"Return Receipt Requested" th iie below the article nu a'? ., 2. ❑ Restnc a slivery r • The Return Receipt will show to7iRbm c e was delivered and the date 8 c delivered. Consult.postmaster for fee. ® 4 -13 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number o. ,D-p' - or ,Land/ Cc ser 4. / 'I/ _ . - : `�; '2 4b. Service Type re! (( o J/ 5 Caur - Sfree/- A' ❑ Registered El Insured v CI) !ems o R 9'73/ -057 J Certified ❑ COD a(t ( w / ❑ Express Mail Return Receipt for cc - Merchandise 7. DatDQvVV ty �Q o ('r Z 5. Signature (Addressee) 8. Addressee's Address(Only if requested li • D and fee is paid) e yet g In 6. Signature (Agent) a). PS Form 3811, Dece er 1991 *U.S.GPO'1993-352-714 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT _ I _ - - NOTIC- -OF PROPOSED AM DMENT This form must be received by DLCD at least 45 days prior to the final hearing ORS 197.610 and OAR Chapter 660,Division 18 See reverse side for submittal requirements Jurisdiction G T`? of :\.C7 ■,21s Date of Final Hearing 5123)5S- Local File# CPA 9 S-0 W f 20 n) ' f- ° i Has this proposal been previously submitted to DLCD? Yes X. No Date Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment X Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment ; _ Land Use Regulation Amendment JC, Zoning Map Amendment _ New Land Use Regulation Briefly summarize the proposal: Do not use technical terms. Do not write "See Attached." AME,.io ilivr 73GCohAzckfetis-, " nAJ P fit oil Co14/4Gio4L Pep- /e5Sr0#JAL (j.q4 Ac4eS, A-tub Lac) .13 6.-k.5)7 ReS1Dc v -.4Z (2.01 AC.P.4S\ it) 1-€eA((ir1-J.k6c4 Q SIdLAri-►Z 4.) GtiAn) e 1W ZoMC146 F1'011 C—P(3.44 Acres,ANU k-4:s (z.oi AC 12.e ib R 25 ( 5 4,--E Cc1.AM.-;'2ciAI. PaoresS(D✓AL Plan Map Change From Avt t.oW b 2e.i ov,Ri.v‘.., to /'tb of -144 GI l k=s r o 4JTL Zone Map Change From C.-P A d R-4.S to k- 2S • Locafion:5 n4 or Su.) PrAer-ve 5r aczer A-r Acres Involved: S•5 Q.S fxca-c 25 w+ITS)Ac.R.F Specified change in Density: Current Density o., 2.01 iz Proposed Density oN 5-•5 t ()WS CTo1 t 4..(�S� C-TmT.."L = 13 ! Vw+ST> Applicable Goals: I 2 lo � 12 t a Is an Exception proposed? Yes lA, No Affected State or Federal Agencies, Local Governments or Special Districts: .-- LCD 3 ,c4 Crt- A , 0.0 o f Local Contact: RAY Phone: 139- 417) Address: 131 ZS- S( OA Li_ 6LJ -) T:GA1 02 97223 • DLCD File# Date Rec'd It De Is Notice _ _ _ _ SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS • ORS 197.610 and OAR Chapter 660,Division 18 • 1. Send this Form and Three (3) Copies of the Proposed Amendment to: Department of Land Conservation and Development 1175 Court Street, N.E. Salem, Oregon 97310-0590 2. Unless exempt by ORS 197.610(2), proposed amendments must be received at the Salem DLCD office at least 45 days before the final hearing on the proposal. 3. Submittal of,proposed amendments shall include the text of the amendment and any other information the local government believes is necessary to advise DLCD of the proposal. "Text" means the specific language being added to.ordeleted from the acknowledged plan or land use regulations. A general description of the proposal is not adequate. • 4. Submittal of proposed "map" amendments must include a map of the affected area showing existing and proposed plan and zone designations. The map should be on 81 by 11 inch paper. A legal description, tax account number, address or general description is not adequate. 5: Submittal of proposed amendments which involve a goal exception must include the proposed language of the exception. • If you need more copies of this form, copy it on green paper or call the DLCD office. at 503-373-0050. • 0 a - IT A-. - - - • EXHIBIT RU E LJ m 1 i i ', H I I I I I I I I -_ I - - • SPRUS WI - 11(1142P1■■■■11/ -. luiMill - ., A - .,_,, 1 OR T S %lb. do iume 4•11 `1I L4 7 - -• a ,laimeIVILAIII ' u.1 •Ii : �4- � � 0 mil. 1116:1‘. . Z a [---- -Li ■ wI, j� PF ST . Q tr - O.• lit %j� a• - II NI 0� � 32, - A PI e ■ 1 la ■ 0 -- PIA , 4. r*S- $ 7._. r IN (. - v . ■• • OA q'SI ladi _ - :4. ‘t% VICINITY EXHIBIT MAP E:: ::::, PRaTEsED "P MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND ZONE CHANGE FROM R-4.5 TO R-25 „ v����� PROPOSED PLAN CHANGE FROM C-P TO •.•TH MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND Sods 1.400' ZONE CHANGE FROM C-P TO R-25 FEET • A REFER TO STAFF REPORT 0 • 400 800 TIGARD CITY LIMITS OkvasOAT MCPADWO 3115/56 CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 ANDREWS MGMT. (Page 1 of L) EXHIBIT "B" 1S136CC-00100 I 1S136CC-002 O BARASCH, GEORGE VERHAREN, ARTHUR WARD AND BY GENERAL MOTORS CORP VERHAREN, MARGARET COULTER ATTN: RON STINEBISER 12435 SW 60TH 485 WEST MILWAUKEE AVE PORTLAND OR 97219 DETROIT MI 48202 1S136CC-00300 1S136CC-00400 HERBERHOLZ, PAUL A ANNA MCGUIRE, ROBERT J/WILLIAM A 8400 SW PFAFFLE ST SARAH A/JAMES E AND TIGARD OR 97223 THOMAS P 8470 SW PFAFFLE ST TIGARD OR 97223 1S136CC-02200 1S135DA-00500 OREGON, STATE OF HWY DIVISION GRAHAM, DON G AND BY REAVES, RICHARD E BROSSIA, PAUL F TRANSPORATION BLDG 11260 SW HALL BLVD SALEM OR 97310 TIGARD OR 97223 1S135DA-00700 1S135DA-01000 BROSSIA, PAUL F AND SCHAEFFER, DONALD M GRAHAM, DON G MUNCH, MICHAEL T 11260 SW HALL BLVD 14520 SW BULL MT RD TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97282 1S135DA-01100 1S135DA-01200 SCHAEFFER, DONALD M MUNCH, MICHAEL T AND MUNCH, MICHAEL T SCHAEFFER, DONALD M 14520 SW BULL MT RD 14520 SW BULL MT RD TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 1S136CB-00890 1S136CB-00900 BECKHAM, PAUL D AND DEBORAH R GROSHART, JAY ROBERT AND 8485 SW PFAFFLE BETTY R TIGARD OR 97223 8465 SW PFAFFLE TIGARD OR 97223 15136CB-01000 1S136CB-01900 COWLEY, TRUMAN G PFAFFLE, HELEN N TR 8395 SW PFAFFLE ST 8225 SW PFAFFLE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S136CB-02900 1S136CB-03000 ROBERTS, DAVID H/IDA MAE BOTTELIN, MICHEL 8355 SW PFAFFLE 11295 SW 83RD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S136CB-03100 1S136CB-06300 DAVIDSON, ROBERT C MOLLIE OLLISON, RANDY L AND 11265 SW 83RD CINDY A TIGARD OR 97223 11290 SW 83RD TIGARD OR 97223 1S136CB-06400 1S136CB-06500 HOILAND, STEPHAN A/JENNY C WICK, MURRAY A 11320 SW 83RD 4460 ALHAMBRA STREET TIGARD OR 97223 SAN DIEGO CA 92107 • - Exhibit "B" h:\login\patty\cpa95-01.1bs March 27,1995 CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT Pate 2 of 2 Andrews Management 4000 SW Kruse Way Place Arthur & Margaret Verharen Building 1, Suite 270 12435 SW 60th Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Portland, OR 97219 McGuire, Robert/William/James/Thomas Paul & Anna Herberholz Powell, Sarah 8400 SW Pfaff le Street 8470 SW Pfaff le Street Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Oregon Department of Transportation Spencer Vail Region 1/Property Management Office Planning Consultant 5320 SW Macadam 4505 N.E. 24th Avenue Portland, OR 97201 Portland, OR 97211 STOUBER, JAN RORMAN, SUE 11260 SW 79TH 11250 SW 82ND TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS / CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TO: / •///,//I�/ DATE: March 16, 1995 FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Rav Valone (x336) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT(CPA)95-0001/ZONE CHANGE(ZON)95-0002 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT ► A request to amend the comprehensive plan map from C-P (Commercial Professional) and Low-Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential, and to change the zoning from C-P and R-4.5 to R-25. LOCATION: South of SW Pfaffle Street at SW 83rd Avenue (WCTM 1S1 36CC, tax lots 200, 300, 400 and 2,200). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:Comprehensive Plan Policies 2, 6, 8 and 12; Community Development Code Chapters 18.22, 18.32 and 18.56 and the change or mistake quasi-judicial plan map amendment criteria of the comprehensive plan (policy 1.1.2) and community development code (18.22.040). ZONE: Currently, two parcels (3.44 acres) are C-P and two parcels (2.07 acres) are R-4.5. The C-P zone allows groups of businesses and offices in centers to provide opportunities for employment and for business and professional services. The R-4.5 district allows single-family residential units, public support facilities, residential treatment homes, farming, family day care, and home occupations among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - March 27, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: • Phone Number: CPA 95-0001/ZON 95-0002 ANDERSON MANAGEMENT March 16,1995 ® CcAJd APP-4G.4.,r- ke9on. n„✓, �/tn„JSA 5-14..1.1:0�( 0 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS -NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS • EIN::It�tVOL tc iT s;.' ?: : :'.' ::::::?i<..: :y y`><:[::::::: := ; : ::::::;'::i` .:'::..:*:.:: 3i:il:,:iiii::::ii%::::`:; :`<i:. <&kY':i>::(::ri>:::: ::::<:><,:„..?,::>>>;:;»: ::..,„,.>:::„..,:::::ii:::'<':::ii`i i,„&::_,i.i:,`:::X`:' i :2-:::: 3:::i.i (Circle o . CIT Area: (N) (S)t17!}(W) ”Placed for review in Library CET Book” _CPO NO. ,.. .♦-•.\,..,t-.,+.,•}.t,..w\\.t t......t.,...,;:.•}:'Sa ..,,..t't,♦•:.♦•:}t::}'•t::::::•.................:.:.......................::.<:::}:::::::'?- i•:•::::.:.....,.......::::::..:::.:........t. .... - .,......., .::. .,. ;.}.: •v. ,•♦\�,v --., ...... a...v.♦♦. ..v 3.•:•::.: ,v•:••...... . .............n+• ::::::.::::::::.:.v:::::::.v:::.-:::::: .v::.:::.::.::.::::::::::.v:::.v::•�::::::::.v-.v:.: :::::::•:nv::: :::.:::: :::,w.vv........ ....v........ � p-.4{T.?34.,., x....... ,.-ST`:.: :}v:{•?:.>.,v}.-.�{ .y.y:v..tnv:}:: :........••v ....n:::.::::.:::::::::::. ::::::..,................... ,.............. 2i Building Offickd/Dave Scott PoUce/Ketly Jennings _ ® Reid Operations/John Acker I _City Recorder/Cathy Wheatley ' Engineering/Michael Anderson Permits Facilitator/Jerree Gaynor Advanced Planning/Card Landsman _Water Department/Michael .. -♦k:tV"Y;'♦:iL3::,K.t..\{ti{:\\;3'{�'tit{t{;{''ti;•.4•:,'Ati'+:':'t;v'M.}:•:;;;{'ii3:'vi•:'•?'{-':....:':.;.;..v .}}h}:-0:S:ti3}:�}:i'•i":+iC:::}}??:t3':ti4: \A \ ♦\a �\ ....... ......,..:::vw..,•v:.v:{n::?�..:i'�::::.}-: t iK{i•:;v,.'i Si-{. �.\� ,�.\}v,'?\ t�i�•:a,♦L v�\�h\�.;•,3•pn�'•::�v.•T\v{♦.}..1..::r-v:3?.v:�?n4: ..4..3'., ::fv:n... .4:n}vvM:.J::-:-'^. n.'}.�� ♦.�$.......:.,\ ��i.H..:.v.vn.:.... ..tA•.w:.�....,, �(��( 3}}:•:v::.:�::::::::: r. ?r{,-,,-.i:::.v:.t:..v v,:,.?�C-O -.-..:.w.v.. .........\..o4''a.. ..............,..\.v}:i}:} n..... ..............�iM.717i :?:?:::........................::4:..::}:i}}}??}i}}??'.�::.:�:._::.,v...........v:: ............. ....:.`. ,,,......... .♦v .•::::,:::........... .i:::: .................v...n...n .??.:.....v:::.: :•::::::::...................................................................0 1:;............. ::.::.::::: :.y:.::::v..vv::....:::::: ..\-}4;::::f?i?} t:.:-::Xi::?::::i:k}:?.v:is��:j:':i::i:::::::::::::J i:?::':::i�{�:vi:::::::::?::i::::i:::::::i:::ii::isisi;:;:ii::?:�Yi::r::ii`?}:�i`:i:::i::::i::::::'i:ii::i::i::?ii::�C:i::::�:�:}$i::ii::;:�::y.::::ii:� �i::'r:: :i:::;::;i::�:j?:� ::;::::ii:: i:i:: :?::':' : ::i::�::�:ii:•r::::::: i: j:::::::?:::i:::;ii:: :ii:::i:::T�:::: Fire District • X Unified Sewerage•,Agency XTualatin Valley Water District (pick-up box) SWM Program/Lee Walker PO Box 745 155 N.First Street Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro.OR 97124 Vv: \:\v-v-.♦,•.44\,♦ S.y,\•. 'hv;:. W:: 'iv ?>.::{ :'v:$:?.i:\:::ti is iii vii::?il:hill:::?::i$i':Ki:.':�.:,:ig�:?:i i':.;:::}:lk:s - ��. w..�.. �•K +. .\. .,k \KU:::aii:::+:•:c:y:.•:?:•`.:744::;:1.... ':pi<:i T.k....,::\'.?.}:}.,.n�♦4 •\5.�cT`•. „a�.,• r \�,++.tit\�:t.,.::C\.t♦x�:•:.,-.:3::.,,-:.,•:~.a}. :::.t•::. .::•:`c{.},:.):•. ..:�:.•r ,:}:T:,•r. ......... .... . .. ... . .\�, �..,, •.•. ,., t. .. K. ...,....... .. ,....:r::.�:�•::.::.}:+•}:•:t:•>}'•}:',::t•}:••}-;.}}:;•}x..••:'+:•:••}••}}}:-??:-::-:;-r:-:,:{-.♦.::.,,-::::::::::.;•.::::::::: +` i•Tticfi.?:`:i'••. \`` t ,.. '�v� y .. .v...:?.-::?.,v-:vh...................... ...t....v......tv,..w:.w::.-:::�vv:.:v:::::.::.v::::.v.::::::.l,v:::.:::::::. :6:S:,;ivv?}??:v..v�......4.v T.♦vv.. ♦. \41�.-�1a�'•..�\ yt.���vv \•i?•}\\\.�\\':3?....v.,v,:• .v}. C�:a�•..t::4.v:v..... ................ ................. _.. ...._. .. �• ........ W ................................. ..._.._ ...S .�v:vv.{;.}-� Washington Co.Land Use&Transportation Boundary Comrrissbn METRO-GREENSPACES PROGRAM 150 N.First Avenue 800 NE Oregon St.#16.Suite 540 Mel lisle (CPA's/ZOA's) Hillsboro,OR 97124 �- Portland.OR 97232-2109 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland.OR 97232-2736 Brent Curtis(CPA's) - State Highway Division tg Jim Tice(1GA'S) Sam Hu midi ".000T/Region 1 — Mike Bomeson(Engineer) PO Box 25412 ////"���`Laurie Nicholson/Transportation Planning _Scott King(CPA's) Portland.OR 97725-0412 - 123 N.W.Flanders —Tom Harry(Current Flaming App's) Portkmd,OR 97209-4307 _Lynn Bailey(Current Planning App's) 4-..Oregon DLCD(CPA's/ZOA's) - \1175 Court Street.N.E:. _Other , _City of Beaverton Salem.OR 97310-0590 Jim Hendryx-Principal Planner Ctty of Portland PO Box 4755 _City of Durham Planning Director Beaverton.OR 97076 City Manager 1120 SW 5th PO Box 23483-3483 Portland.OR 97204 City of King City Tigard.OR 97281 City Manager _City of Lake Oswego 15300 SW 116th _City of Tualatin City Manager King City.OR 97224 PO Box 369 PO.Box 369 Tualatin.OR 97062 Lake Oswego,OR 97034 vv LV,:3::3}.:.}. }:••:::�?v::}:•};;s:::::.t.v..v:v3:{:::-vv::.:}::';•?::;,:••.:.:::•i }}::::::: .. . .:. . .:i- ::,.r:....�::\:i 'N+i:'}'ri;+i:•:{?t; ;{i?:•{;iy�::: .}• yv\•-a. t v\..h4.h}.. .,4..:•:t •:}.. Sv.. h v .a.\ •\+,v ,\:•.vv♦ha 4v.4 v}-. C' ?i•%•:v?:-}?}}i:?::^ii:`vi:::•::.{:iiiiiiiiiii T?r:::C {?i:':i:•:{:::r$::}:•\.....J.*..t.v •}::Ti�:,L •}:. �;•�'w::•�Sfi�.'•.: •,'+\}\••�♦T.<:3.'-}??};.}:.,xt�,k• .,�t::i;.�. -..�'' .:��3:{;•tT>3•:3'?{t3T?:•}}:- ::3i :•?:+• •:•S:ot:{.•{.{..}: :•3:3}f•.a};`.C::_i��.}:a:{h}Lt♦, :b'. ;.c\ ll :. 4'"iiig:M..;}....:y{ . vnt-{x : vx.., .. ..}.:t••:::.v::::E :: :. •„ � ,�:•t �•.•. ..rt :t.^:;'.;-?:'-:;:.?:t:.}i.:{;ii ••}T:;•}{•}:•}x•}:;:{•`.•}:i•::-}}}.i-::} ::-+i•>:-}:-}{}}• {;.?T:ii+ Sb'Z .�. S.t .,�` t t.,a., S.t.r..,..... ..T....:.::i:+-::.:, . ,r.;.. .• ,}. .}} .\1.. yv.}: ...T}:i} :}T;}? ? },.•:?{}::,?.i;:jn::v::. .,............ t 16.147*,„*.:Zak:RMSW �..,? .a,°.`;:4:J� ..`.ti.'.�:,•..\.r-.ih:...•.r:•:.'tk:..{t...,...,...,: :;..:� t:.v1:.. :.C` - - ..........:.:4-:.. ...},,... + �i`� —General Telepi one ' Portland General Electric _Columbia Cable Engheering Office Brian Moore Craig Eyestone• PO Box 23416 14655 SW Old Scholls Ferry Road 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Tigard,OR 97281-3416 ' Beaverton,OR 97007 Beaverton,OR 97005 i_NW Natural Gas _Metro Area Communications/Jason Hewitt { Trl-Met Transit Dev. Scott Palmer Twin Oaks Technology Center q lam Knox 220 NW Second Avenue 1815 NW 169th Place S-6020 710 NE Holladay Street Portland.OR 97209-3991 Beaverton.OR 97006-4886 Portland.OR 97232 — ICI Cabievision of Oregon _US West , Linda Peterson Pete Nelson 3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street • . Portland.OR 97201 Portland.OR 97204 ?%-}vf:rr:.};i•};•:Sy?Y4:{?{+rr;.+.,};...:Yr%::v.}}?'*}:;3}Y.•is s::n}T•?T ? r}'ti{{:::-r.}}}n•}t:•i :3}:; :::ry..;:.}: y. :.:?}}Y{?9 }?T:•?:•}}T}'•:3}}}};--?????}4 -:r:.-.�-? v -:{S:-:is:{•? • ii iti{i :Sii:3 •i}{{•iv:.- •,L y x•'':: -:ray:i x...:..w .-v,.f}v: }.v{:::. .,-.�:.:}T: :r5}.a}T-}:-?:??:`.T.,.T:'w..: +.G£'r... .:y..Sr:.3}r:•:.T}?:-??}:;-}?:•:: • ...`y.:::::. .}:•}:;.}>}}:•.'•:<.:•rT?};t-?>:3:-:-;. :-??:-?-?:-?:�:;;c•?:..:a:.}};:oi-:;.}}}:-?:::^• , :. n .-.:.:::.:: .:rv••t. ... .:...... .,. :.it T.........,.....}T...1........:.:.. - � ::::.::: :::::•:::•:::::::::•.y.::::: :::::::::::•:::::::::::::::::::::.::::,r:: .:...,:.<•:t•:3.....,yw..:..}•,.. .. ... ,..✓.:........,......r.........:.r........ .. ....................,............................................................}>::.}:•-i• •T:{ic•:3i:-}:::}:.;-?: :is . : i.pp,>>..vn...?:::;':...... ..., vv,.... ..r n.vv:ny::. .T..v v: .. r.::.y.::.y:. ::n::::: .r...x..,..:...n.v vh♦,..'?`..v..::r'.{tf:..A.v�::.{. Y.S::::::rn:r...... ....... :::::...........................................::. :... ..:............... ..,...n....... ......r....r:::v::::............. }r•tv..;.>.ii'r.'::jv:•'f.•i}?ii::•:;�.}}.v,:::;isi::i'f.:i::}:�:L::>.j::.}:>.::}:•iiJ:�:vitii :}l.::iiii>�}:+:i'ii}iiii:i•4i???:;5:5:2r:^::?iiiiiii?:?i::$1:i:i}{:}:?T?�ii:;. Aeronautics Division(ODOT) Division of State Lands US Postal Service Commence Dept.-M.H.Park —Fish&Wildlife —Randy Hammock.Growth Coordinator PUC _DOGAMI • Cedar Mill Station _Dept.of Environ. Quality Portland.OR 97229-9998 :>f'•> :><::::T:::i:•;?;;:;-}:;;> :.??;T>:-:;-;:-??:-??:-;:.?:-?:-?:;.???::i?i:•};??::::?:.::z:is i::;:<:::>:<:::<:::;;;>:.>:.}:::•}:- ;:-;:.?:-?;;:-?;:•?;:;;.;:•}:-}??:-:;-:;-?:->:.;:-?:.;:.?:.?;:-?:-;:.:;-?:-T -?:-:i _Corps of Engineers _Other •::•.y:•::•.r:.nRy........ :.. .....rr;?;:Sx`;:;:r..;.:.. .r::::::.�.,:•rr r,•r:•::::... :..... ................... ......::r:::r::::::.}x::.-.;�::r: T•.r}r:{ .:.....::r:: y:...rr.....:r...:...r.....:.... :.t•:: .yr...„... ................................... ..... .. {.... �f.. .{SA .r...: ♦..:.;.- .................... +,..n.;y .yC::::: .i??}}}•?}?}?: f •? •}:::.?::vi'i{; ' ;?i:=' . t ..xSi ..K:T:.... r,y, .:.,. r.. , /.:. .:}.:::::,..:.r..,r r.y.•.y::::::•:. ............................. .}-?.?'.:;.?-:::::............. .. r. f >.�:.rr:..h • trr .: .....r.r.•.�.r :. .. .:r ,. .. . ..........t r:..}....... '-...:.•..tyr.r.' 'r.::.y::-rr:::.}:a.}}:3:^:•}:3}:-}%•:r{•:{•::i::':••. iiii::::!i.�r::ti v:iii:ii^ :�{iC+i�?S. :•v::r:{h.rx•}•.v:•:x:x^.•r.^::: y�;..::Cnr..:w:.+•:4 +f3rx v.+x::.::-:w::::::,•.v....:..... '.n................................. :....v........ a.v....v.r..♦v:.v...}r......:.....n...v.....:..nv. ..n......n.rfA.n...,,.}.{....... r..............:.::::......n...................................::::::::.....................::n:v::::::::::::.v:.v:::::.v::v:.:v.v:::::::.y::n:v::.v:::::. _Southern Pacific Transportation Company Duane M.Forney.PLS-Project Engineer . 800 NW 6th Avenue,R.324.Union Station Portland,OR 97209 h:Uwor+wottyUl and