Loading...
Report (4) -. `� - - - � r . _ _ - 4 • Main Office Salem Office . / Bend Office .. P.O. Box 23814 4060 Hudson Ave., NE P.O. Box 7918 . Tigard, Oregon 97281 Salem, Oregon 97301 Bend, Oregon 97708 Carlson Testing, Inc. Phone (503) 684 -3460 Phone (503) 589 -1252 Phone (541) 330 -9155 - Fax (503) 684 -0954 Fax (503) 589 -1309 Fax (541) 330 -9163 D Report of Wood Construction f Project: / G� ,- / t v / �� y� (% r y q •- q e/ / Address: _ /2 7 8 S , ;,, .�;' C /{w _,, / • 9 eN CTI Job #: 7%43 c:•,.5 J ��, /4""6 0 .� G e/4 / was on site this date 7— / S - / ° to perform CTI representative p . (Inspector Name & Cert. No.) Special Inspection for • R permit D DFS #(s) , efr _ 6e /64, jurisdiction C ` o '7 In some cases more than -one box may be checked for a given item. SCOPE OF INSPECTION INSPE - _ ' 4 Yes No N/A 1. Checked in with superintendent, client or shop rep. 15. Verified 3" nominal framing members are provided -and t/� Name: Lp.E nails are staggered where shown on approved *pe rmit documents. - Company: �� �' 16. Verified lag bolts, when part of the lateral force. resisting , 2. Inspection was "IBC" El Continuous eriodic system, have properly sized clearance holes,for.their • j .. shanks and lead holesfor their'thi'eaded portions: . 3. Work performed: the field 1=j At fab shop 17. Confirmed bolt holes were a min. of 1/32" and a"max. _ ' - Shop name: of 1/16" larger than the bolt diameter. _ . / (If bolts are being installed during visit) • 4. If shop inspection do they have fabrication and QC 18. Checked that shear walls of gypsum sheathing board • procedures? 0 Yes El No I2 /A and/or gypsum wall board in combination with wood framing conform to the applicable requirements of INSPECTION Yes No N/A the State Building Code, Ch. 23. • 1. Reviewed previous inspection reports? Location of inspection [to include grid lines, elevations 2. Verified grade, species and size of lumber, and (floors and drawing details]: . • grade and thickness of wood structual panels used f � � p ( S� L � — 463:51•41:. �'' `✓�rti1/ in the vertical and horizontal diaphrams conform. ,�CJo,-7 /-0 O u, - _ L� / - .�, ' • 3. Confirmed wood structural panels -were manufactured / a-4 C L� ,,, 7 -5 Z-- e ) 1; • withPexterior glue based on ID stamp. V / , � ,- 4. Verified nail or staple diameter and - length, number of a fastener lines, and spacing between fasteners in each / c--.' C ' c .5 /_� rifts ,4 '" Z line`and•at edge-margins is in compliance. •3.-vi S y 5. Verified length and location bf all shear walls. •- / y 6. Checked hold down installations at all shear walls. REPORTS MARY 7. Verified diaphragm chord, drag strut, braces and w .. related details. / 1. Work inspected was: Completed ❑ In progress '' . • 8. Verified connection of blocking to wall top plates conforms. 2. Completed work inspected 0s • ❑ was not ' • 9. Confirmed pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners are 1 manufactured by a member of the International Staple, to corn .lance with - Nail and Tool Assoc. or in accordance with another V _-Approved plans and specifications ❑ Shop drawings ' approved national standard. 10. yerified when pneumatic or mechanically driven fasteners 0 RFI 0 Design change, .0 Submittal 0 N/A . are substituted for common (or other specified) nails, that Document #(s) Dated: requirements for minimum diameter and penetration into - the framing member are met, and notify the EOR. 3. Noncompliance item(s) were noted this date, details on 11. Confirmed nail heads were driven flush without '.. following page(s). rj. Yes 0 NoA penetrating the surface ply of the wood structural panel. . l 12. Verified installation of baseplate bolting was in 4. Noncompliance item(s) were reinspected this date, details confromance. on following page(s). El Yes E No 1/A 13. Verified wood to concrete contact meet EOR/Code - requirements (ie. treated). / El Conform.. / 0 Remain in progress • 14. Confirmed panel edges bear on framing members and butt •, Report(s) findings were discussed and left with along their center lines (with the 1/8" spacing between .. !i(JlL panel edge and end joists as recommended by the APA) - / . -- that nails are placed not less than 3/8" in from the panel of • g s Y edge, and that framing members or blocking are Based oritlle,Code, approval is required from the Building Official before the provided at edges of all sheets in shear walls. IN SPECIAL SPECTED items noted above can be-covered. Carlson Testing n L has no authority to direct work of contractors.or subcontractors. Inspector Signature: ../ Page of __ See additional report ge(s). 0 Distribute attachments. • Wood 4/17/2006 • • TgrinaSd Client recognizes that construction observation_ and/or testing services provided by CT! are techniques which may reduce the risk of construction defects, deficiencies, or omissions arising during or after con- struction. Services performed by CTI do not constitute a warranty or guarantee of any type. Even with diligent construction monitoring andlos testing by CFI, construction deists, deficiencies, or omissions in the C s 'pork wrk may e r st. in all 0cases, Client and/or the Contractor shall assign the Contractor the res; onsi'b2llty for the quaiity and completeness of the work and for adhering to plans and specifca- tions. C L .i s work 5r failure to perform same shall not in any way excuse atty contractor, scbsont actor, or GL :4:ef EOM nt perfe'rtance of its work in accordance witl: the contract deeun?ents. -CT will provide its professional services to Client with that degree of care and slril ordinarily exercised und:''r sicpilar circumstances by members of ;:s }profession. This representa:ror is in lieu of oho.:: warren- or representation, eideer expressed or implied. t is also unrIerstrecd. and :.,Reed that ttatenents _rrtade in C7. _epo ;rs are observations hosed on technical jucignents, and should sir.; be construed to be con - clusive rep.:esesritations of fact. if conditions different from wr-rat are indicated in the report voce to Client's attention after receipt of the reports, it t 'recommended that Client contact C..:71 i imeciately to authorize farther appropriate evaluation. C'I`i's work shall net include determining, supervising or implementing the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction. CTI shall not be responsible for evaluating or reporting job con- ditions related to health, safety or welfare. • Bend Office (541) 330 -9155 Geotechnical Office (503) 601 -8250 Eugene Office (541) 345 -0289 Carlson Testing, Inc. Salem Office (503) 589 -1252 Tigard Office (503) 684-3460 Daily Report of Proprietary Anchors Project: D'4epeo ad .19 els Address: / 2- 7 °S ? Cr 43 .4 h 4 ` CTI Job #: r /vim x-5 � r CTI representative 1 ` P' ¢/S Y a' °`, - 61 dy e was on site this date 7 7 - 0 / ( Ito perform (Inspector Name & Cert. No.) Special Inspection for 0 permit 0 DFS #(s) g 46) ' 2e)/c ' — 00 /6e jurisdiction 4- i` / urisdiction In some cases more than one box may be checked for a given item. SCOPE OF INSPECTION Location of proprietary anchors inspected [to include grid lines, elevations (floors) and drawing details]: 1. Checked in with superintendent or client representative. Name: 1 eKe 7 k La44 €1,©e 42 / a r / et r 3 , / / C Company: " 5 V ,-)g - e k/r i ,15 0, e > > / !✓1 E2 /4.4Gk/ g,, ;AL.- 6 e'er' 4 e 44...f /4— . 2. Inspection was "IBC" ® 0 Periodic -. . -- r /l"Sca CP X/ . PROPRIETARY ANCHORS Yes No N/A 1. Reviewed previous inspection reports? ..4 2. Reviewed evaluation report? / - I REPORT SUMMARY Verified following items meet manufacturer's published installation instructions. 1. Work inspected was: Completed ❑ In progress 3. Verified minimum embedment depth of the 2. Completed work inspected Q was 0 was not _ . anchors. / 4.Verified installation of the anchors. ' e . in compliance with Approved plans and specifications 0 Shop drawings 5. Verified anchor diameter. O 6. Verified steel grade. / El RFI ❑ Design change 0 Submittal N/A 7. Verified hole diameter. , Document #(s) Dated: 8. Verified type of drill bit used. .. s 3. Noncompliance item(s) were noted this date, details on 9. Verified hole cleaning method. o - following page(s). ID Yes Ei No • sN /A 10. Verified adhesive application. ✓ 11. Verified edge distance. ...,. 4. Noncompliance item(s) were reinspected this date, details 12. Verified spacing. , on following page(s). ❑ Yes El No EVN /A 13. Verified installation torque. 7 El Conform El Remain in progress Evaluation report number & date: Report(s) findings were discussed and left with q- / - 2.-42? of 12 "S✓ Name of product being installed S- ¢" X P Batch Number 3q t V` 1t.1 6 Expiration Date b- Fe,- /r Based on the Code, approval is required fromthe Building Official before the SPECIAL INSPECTED items noted above can be covered. Carlson Testing has no au ority work of contractors or subcontractors. Inspector Signature: ,,'� 0 See additional reportpage(s). El Distribute attachments. Page / of i PropAnchors Ver.1 2/12/2009 Terms Client recognizes that construction observation and/or testing services provided by CTI are techniques which may reduce the risk of construction defects, deficiencies, or omissions arising during or after con- struction. Services performed by CTI do not constitute a warranty or guarantee of any type. Even with diligent construction monitoring and /or testing by CTI, construction defects, deficiencies, or omissions in the Contractor's work may exist. In all cases, Client and /or the Contractor shall assign the Contractor the responsibility for the quality and completeness of the work and for adhering to plans and specifica- tions. CTI's work or failure to perform same shall not in any way excuse any contractor, subcontractor, or supplier from performance of its work in accordance with the contract documents. CTI will provide its professional services to Client with that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by members of its profession. This representation is in lieu of other warran- ty or representation, either expressed or implied. It is also understood and agreed that statements made in CTI reports are observations based on technical judgments, and should not be construed to be con- clusive representations of fact. If conditions different from what are indicated in the reports come to Client's attention after receipt of the reports, it is recommended that Client contact CTI immediately to authorize further appropriate evaluation. CTI's work shall not include determining, supervising or implementing the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction. CTI shall not be responsible for evaluating or reporting job con- ditions related to health, safety or welfare. •